UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

☒

Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the Quarterly Period Ended ~~March 31,~~

September 30, 2020

¨☐

Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the transition period from ______ to ______

Commission File Number: 001-34025

INTREPID POTASH, INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)



Delaware			26-1501877
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)			(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
1001 17^th Street, Suite 1050 ~~Denver, Colorado~~
Denver,
Colorado			80202
(Address of principal executive offices)			(Zip Code)

(303) 296-3006

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)


N/A
~~N/A~~
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act

Title of each class

Trading symbol

Name of each exchange on which registered

Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share

IPI

New York Stock Exchange

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x☒ No ¨☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files.) Yes x No ¨☒No☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer," "smaller reporting company," and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer

☐

Accelerated filer

☒

Non-accelerated filer

☐

Smaller reporting company

☐

Emerging growth company

☐


~~Large accelerated filer~~ ¨			~~Accelerated filer~~ x	~~Non~~-~~accelerated filer~~ ¨
~~Smaller reporting company~~ ¨	~~Emerging~~ If an emerging growth company, ¨	indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ¨

~~Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes~~ ¨ No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes

☐

☒

As of ~~April 30,~~October 27, 2020, the registrant had outstanding ~~131,484,066~~13,294,158 shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share.

Table of Contents

INTREPID POTASH, INC.

TABLE OF CONTENTS



			Page
			PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION			1
			ITEM 1. Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)			1
			Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets			1
			Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations			2
			Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity			3
			Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows			4
			Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements			56
			ITEM 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations			1421
			ITEM 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures ~~about~~About Market Risk			2943
			ITEM 4. Controls and Procedures			2943
			PART II - OTHER INFORMATION			3144
			ITEM 1. Legal Proceedings			3144
			ITEM 1A. Risk Factors			3245
			ITEM 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds			3346
			ITEM 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities			3446
			ITEM 4. Mine Safety Disclosures			3446
			ITEM 5. Other Information			3446
			ITEM 6. Exhibits			3547
			Signatures			3648

Table of Contents

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

INTREPID POTASH, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)


	March 31,			December 31,				September 30,		December 31,
	2020			2019				2020		2019
ASSETS							ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents	$	44,371		$	20,603		Cash and cash equivalents	$	9,258	$	20,603

Accounts receivable:							Accounts receivable:
Trade, net	31,862			23,749			Trade, net	23,271		23,749
Other receivables, net	1,554			1,247			Other receivables, net	2,575		1,247

Inventory, net	87,860			94,220			Inventory, net	85,204		94,220
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	4,669			5,524			Prepaid expenses and other current assets	5,844		5,524
Total current assets	170,316			145,343			Total current assets	126,152		145,343

Property, plant, equipment, and mineral properties, net	372,057			378,509			Property, plant, equipment, and mineral properties, net	362,117		378,509

Water rights	19,184			19,184			Water rights	19,184		19,184
Long-term parts inventory, net	28,403			27,569			Long-term parts inventory, net	28,978		27,569

Other assets, net	7,726			7,834			Other assets, net	10,960		7,834

Total Assets	$	597,686		$	578,439		Total Assets	$	547,391	$	578,439
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY							LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

Accounts payable	$	12,377		$	9,992		Accounts payable	$	8,037	$	9,992

Income taxes payable	50			50			Income taxes payable	0		50
Accrued liabilities	27,461			13,740			Accrued liabilities	12,817		13,740
Accrued employee compensation and benefits	3,994			4,464			Accrued employee compensation and benefits	5,806		4,464
Advances on credit facility	—			19,817			Advances on credit facility	0		19,817
Current portion of long-term debt	20,000			20,000
Current portion of long-term debt, net							Current portion of long-term debt, net	10,000		20,000
Other current liabilities	19,393			19,382			Other current liabilities	27,779		19,382
Total current liabilities	83,275			87,445			Total current liabilities	64,439		87,445

Advances on credit facility	29,817			—			Advances on credit facility	29,817		0
Long-term debt, net	29,781			29,753			Long-term debt, net	14,918		29,753
Asset retirement obligation	22,574			22,140			Asset retirement obligation	23,437		22,140
Operating lease liabilities	3,577			4,025			Operating lease liabilities	2,660		4,025
Other non-current liabilities	420			420			Other non-current liabilities	1,024		420
Total Liabilities	169,444			143,783			Total Liabilities	136,295		143,783
Commitments and Contingencies							Commitments and Contingencies
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 400,000,000 shares authorized;
129,643,509 and 129,553,517 shares outstanding
at March 31, 2020, and December 31, 2019, respectively	130			130
Common stock, 0.001 par value; 40,000,000 shares authorized;							Common stock, 0.001 par value; 40,000,000 shares authorized;
13,006,427 and 12,955,351 shares outstanding							13,006,427 and 12,955,351 shares outstanding
at September 30, 2020, and December 31, 2019, respectively							at September 30, 2020, and December 31, 2019, respectively	13		13
Additional paid-in capital	653,946			652,963			Additional paid-in capital	655,964		653,080
Retained deficit	(225,834		)	(218,437		)

Accumulated deficit							Accumulated deficit	(244,881)		(218,437)
Total Stockholders' Equity	428,242			434,656			Total Stockholders' Equity	411,096		434,656
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity	$	597,686		$	578,439		Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity	$	547,391	$	578,439

See accompanying notes to these condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

INTREPID POTASH, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(In thousands, except per share amounts)


	Three Months Ended March 31,							Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2020			2019				2020		2019		2020		2019
Sales	$	63,984		$	57,554		Sales	$	38,078	$	51,160	$	148,512	$	171,226
Less:							Less:
Freight costs	11,860			10,456			Freight costs	7,802		8,724		28,397		30,473
Warehousing and handling costs	2,904			2,236			Warehousing and handling costs	2,315		2,162		7,284		6,628
Cost of goods sold	43,047			31,694			Cost of goods sold	27,045		31,863		104,100		99,375
Lower of cost or net realizable value inventory adjustments	550			—			Lower of cost or net realizable value inventory adjustments	1,224		1,462		4,015		1,462
Gross Margin	5,623			13,168

Gross (Deficit) Margin							Gross (Deficit) Margin	(308)		6,949		4,716		33,288

Selling and administrative	6,599			5,807			Selling and administrative	6,750		5,548		20,022		17,710
Accretion of asset retirement obligation	435			417			Accretion of asset retirement obligation	434		513		1,303		1,347

Litigation settlement	10,075			—			Litigation settlement	0		0		10,075		0
(Gain) loss on sale of asset	(4,696		)	19
Other operating (income) expense	(11		)	501
Loss (gain) on sale of assets							Loss (gain) on sale of assets	21		(56)		(4,441)		(17)
Other operating expense							Other operating expense	237		329		495		792
Operating (Loss) Income	(6,779		)	6,424			Operating (Loss) Income	(7,750)		615		(22,738)		13,456

Other Income (Expense)							Other Income (Expense)
Interest expense, net	(792		)	(603		)	Interest expense, net	(2,450)		(849)		(3,877)		(2,258)
Interest income	116			—			Interest income	0		0		116		0
Other (expense) income	16			334			Other (expense) income	25		9		13		343
(Loss) Income Before Income Taxes	(7,439		)	6,155			(Loss) Income Before Income Taxes	(10,175)		(225)		(26,486)		11,541

Income Tax Benefit	42			—			Income Tax Benefit	0		8		42		8
Net (Loss) Income	$	(7,397	)	$	6,155		Net (Loss) Income	$	(10,175)	$	(217)	$	(26,444)	$	11,549

Weighted Average Shares Outstanding:							Weighted Average Shares Outstanding:
Basic	129,572			128,730			Basic	13,006		12,917		12,981		12,893
Diluted	129,572			130,880			Diluted	13,006		12,917		12,981		13,106
Earnings Per Share:							Earnings Per Share:
Basic	$	(0.06	)	$	0.05		Basic	$	(0.78)	$	(0.02)	$	(2.04)	$	0.90
Diluted	$	(0.06	)	$	0.05		Diluted	$	(0.78)	$	(0.02)	$	(2.04)	$	0.88

See accompanying notes to these condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

INTREPID POTASH, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

(In thousands, except share amounts)


	Nine-Month Period Ended September 30, 2020
	Common Stock			Additional Paid-in Capital		Accumulated Deficit		Total Stockholders' Equity
	Shares	Amount
Balance, December 31, 2019	12,955,351	$	13	$	653,080	$	(218,437)	$	434,656



Net loss	—	—		—		(26,444)		(26,444)
Stock-based compensation	—	—		2,981		—		2,981

Vesting of restricted common stock, net of common stock used to fund employee income tax withholding due upon vesting	51,076	—		(97)		—		(97)
Balance, September 30, 2020	13,006,427	$	13	$	655,964	$	(244,881)	$	411,096

	Three-Month Period Ended September 30, 2020
	Common Stock			Additional Paid-in Capital		Accumulated Deficit		Total Stockholders' Equity
	Shares	Amount
Balance, June 30, 2020	13,006,124	$	13	$	654,901	$	(234,706)	$	420,208



Net loss	—	—		—		(10,175)		(10,175)
Stock-based compensation	—	—		985		—		985

Vesting of restricted common stock, net of common stock used to fund employee income tax withholding due upon vesting	303	—		78		—		78
Balance, September 30, 2020	13,006,427	$	13	$	655,964	$	(244,881)	$	411,096

	Nine-Month Period Ended September 30, 2019
	Common Stock			Additional Paid-in Capital		Accumulated Deficit		Total Stockholders' Equity
	Shares	Amount
Balance, December 31, 2018	12,871,659	$	13	$	649,318	$	(232,068)	$	417,263



Net income	—	—		—		11,549		11,549
Stock-based compensation	—	—		3,237		—		3,237
Vesting of restricted common stock, net of common stock used to fund employee income tax withholding due upon vesting	44,450	—		(269)		—		(269)
Exercise of stock options	919	—		0		—		0
Balance, September 30, 2019	12,917,028	$	13	$	652,286	$	(220,519)	$	431,780

	Three-Month Period Ended September 30, 2019
	Common Stock			Additional Paid-in Capital		Accumulated Deficit		Total Stockholders' Equity
	Shares	Amount
Balance, June 30, 2019	12,917,028	$	13	$	651,311	$	(220,302)	$	431,022



Net loss	—	—		—		(217)		(217)
Stock-based compensation	—	—		975		—		975


Balance, September 30, 2019	12,917,028	$	13	$	652,286	$	(220,519)	$	431,780

Three-Month Period Ended March 31, 2019
Common Stock Additional Paid-in Capital Retained Deficit Total Stockholders' Equity
Shares Amount
Balance, December 31, 2018 128,716,595
$ 129
$ 649,202
$ (232,068 ) $ 417,263
Net income —
—
—
6,155
6,155
Stock-based compensation —
—
1,031
—
1,031
Vesting of restricted common stock, net of common stock used to fund employee income tax withholding due upon vesting 55,249
—
(112 ) —
(112 )
Exercise of stock options 9,187
—
9
—
9
March 31, 2019 128,781,031
$ 129
$ 650,130
$ (225,913 ) $ 424,346

Three-Month Period Ended March 31, 2020
Common Stock Additional Paid-in Capital Retained Deficit Total Stockholders' Equity
Shares Amount
Balance, December 31, 2019 129,553,517
$ 130
$ 652,963
$ (218,437 ) $ 434,656
Net loss —
—
—
(7,397 ) (7,397 )
Stock-based compensation —
—
1,032
—
1,032
Vesting of restricted common stock, net of common stock used to fund employee income tax withholding due upon vesting 89,992
—
(49 ) —
(49 )
Exercise of stock options
—

—
—
Balance, March 31, 2020 129,643,509
$ 130
$ 653,946
$ (225,834 ) $ 428,242

See accompanying notes to these condensed consolidated financial statements.

~~INTREPID POTASH, INC.~~

~~CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS~~

~~(In thousands)~~

Three Months Ended March 31,
2020 2019
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
Net (loss) income $ (7,397 ) $ 6,155
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation, depletion and amortization 9,586
8,746
Accretion of asset retirement obligation 435
417
Amortization of deferred financing costs 86
68
Amortization of intangible assets 80
—
Stock-based compensation 1,032
1,031
Lower of cost or net realizable value inventory adjustments 550
—
Accrual for litigation settlement 10,075
—
(Gain) loss on disposal of assets (4,696 ) 19
Allowance for doubtful accounts 275
—
Other —
4
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Trade accounts receivable, net (8,388 ) (3,057 )
Other receivables, net (308 ) (362 )
Inventory, net 4,976
(4,091 )
Prepaid expenses and other current assets 857
103
Accounts payable, accrued liabilities, and accrued employee
compensation and benefits 8,119
2,455
Operating lease liabilities (552 ) (479 )
Other liabilities 41
(2,888 )
Net cash provided by operating activities 14,771
8,121

Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
Additions to property, plant, equipment, mineral properties and other assets (5,710 ) (3,958 )
Deposit on asset purchase —
(3,250 )
Proceeds from sale of assets 4,786
—
Net cash used in investing activities (924 ) (7,208 )

Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
Proceeds from short-term borrowings on credit facility 10,000
—
Employee tax withholding paid for restricted stock upon vesting (49 ) (112 )
Proceeds from exercise of stock options —
9
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities 9,951
(103 )

Net Change in Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash 23,798
810
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash, beginning of period 21,239
33,704
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash, end of period $ 45,037
$ 34,514

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information
Net cash paid during the period for:
Interest $ 227
$ 49
Income taxes $ —
$ —
Amounts included in the measurement of operating lease liabilities $ 637
$ 565
Accrued purchases for property, plant, equipment, and mineral properties $ 2,557
$ 1,435
Right-of-use assets exchanged for operating lease liabilities $ 104
$ 5.916

Table of Contents


INTREPID POTASH, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2020		2019
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
Net (loss) income	$	(26,444)	$	11,549
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash provided by operating activities:

Depreciation, depletion and amortization	26,377		25,145
Accretion of asset retirement obligation	1,303		1,347
Amortization of deferred financing costs	357		217
Amortization of intangible assets	241		188
Stock-based compensation	2,981		3,237
Lower of cost or net realizable value inventory adjustments	4,015		1,462

Gain on disposal of assets	(4,441)		(17)

Allowance for doubtful accounts	275		50
Allowance for parts inventory obsolescence	492		4
Other	(116)		0
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Trade accounts receivable, net	203		(6,026)
Other receivables, net	(1,328)		(1,379)

Inventory, net	3,100		(3,227)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	(313)		(787)
Accounts payable, accrued liabilities, and accrued employee compensation and benefits	4,071		5,821
Income tax payable	(50)		(914)
Operating lease liabilities	(1,695)		(1,474)
Other liabilities	9,459		2,421
Net cash provided by operating activities	18,487		37,617

Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
Additions to property, plant, equipment, mineral properties and other assets	(14,087)		(59,948)
Additions to intangible assets	0		(16,873)
Long-term investment	(3,500)		0
Proceeds from sale of assets	4,786		68


Net cash used in investing activities	(12,801)		(76,753)

Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
Debt prepayment costs	(1,869)		0
Repayments of long-term debt	(35,000)		0
Proceeds from short-term borrowings on credit facility	10,000		30,317
Repayments of short-term borrowings on credit facility	0		(10,500)
Capitalized debt fees	(36)		(457)
Employee tax withholding paid for restricted stock upon vesting	(96)		(278)
Proceeds from loan under CARES Act	10,000		0
Proceeds from exercise of stock options	0		9
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities	(17,001)		19,091

Net Change in Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash	(11,315)		(20,045)
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash, beginning of period	21,239		33,704
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash, end of period	$	9,924	$	13,659

Table of Contents


INTREPID POTASH, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2020		2019

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information
Net cash paid during the period for:
Interest	$	1,974	$	1,458
Income taxes	$	92	$	968
Amounts included in the measurement of operating lease liabilities	$	1,878	$	1,723
Accrued purchases for property, plant, equipment, and mineral properties	$	1,050	$	1,749
Right-of-use assets exchanged for operating lease liabilities	$	216	$	6,558

See accompanying notes to these condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

INTREPID POTASH, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)


~~Note 1~~	~~— COMPANY BACKGROUND~~

Note 1— COMPANY BACKGROUND

We are a diversified mineral company that delivers potassium, magnesium, sulfur, salt, and water products essential for customer success in agriculture, animal feed and the oil and gas industry. We are the only U.S. producer of muriate of potash (sometimes referred to as potassium chloride or potash), which is applied as an essential nutrient for healthy crop development, utilized in several industrial applications, and used as an ingredient in animal feed. In addition, we produce a specialty fertilizer, Trio^®, which delivers three key nutrients, potassium, magnesium, and sulfate, in a single particle. We also provide water, magnesium chloride, brine and various oilfield products and services.

Our extraction and production operations are conducted entirely in the continental United States. We produce potash from ~~three~~3 solution mining facilities: our HB solution mine in Carlsbad, New Mexico, our solution mine in Moab, Utah, and our brine recovery mine in Wendover, Utah. We also operate the North compaction facility in Carlsbad, New Mexico, which compacts and granulates product from the HB mine. We produce Trio^® from our conventional underground East mine in Carlsbad, New Mexico.

We have water rights in New Mexico under which we sell water primarily to support oil and gas development in the Permian Basin near our Carlsbad facilities. We continue to work to expand our sales of water. In May 2019, we acquired certain land, water rights, state grazing leases for cattle, and other related assets from Dinwiddie Cattle Company. We refer to these assets and operations as "Intrepid South." Due to the strategic location of Intrepid South, part of our long-term operating strategy is selling small parcels of land to other companies, where such sales provide a solution to a company's need.

We have ~~three~~3 segments: potash, Trio^®, and oilfield solutions. We account for sales of byproducts as revenue in the potash or Trio^® segment based on which segment generates the byproduct. Intersegment sales prices are market based and are eliminated.

"Intrepid," "our," "we," or "us," means Intrepid Potash, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries.


~~Note 2~~	~~— SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES~~

Note 2— SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Financial Statement Presentation—Our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information and note disclosures normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP") have been condensed or omitted pursuant to those rules and regulations. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring accruals considered necessary for a fair presentation of interim financial information, have been included. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019.

We have updated our accounting policies for estimating credit losses as a result of adopting Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments - (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments, as discussed in more detail below. We have made no other changes to our significant accounting policies described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019.

Reverse Stock Split—On August 10, 2020, after receipt of stockholder approval, the Board of Directors approved an amendment to our Certificate of Incorporation to effect a reverse stock split of our common stock, par value $0.001 per share, by a ratio of one-for-10. The reverse stock split became effective August 14, 2020. Additionally, the total number of authorized shares of our common stock was reduced to 40,000,000 shares. Unless otherwise indicated, all share amounts, per share data, share prices, exercise prices and conversion rates set forth in these notes and the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have, where applicable, been adjusted retroactively to reflect this reverse stock split.

Recently Adopted Accounting Standards

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments - (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments, which we adopted on January 1, 2020. ASU No. 2016-13 changes the way entities recognize impairment of many financial assets by requiring immediate recognition of estimated credit losses expected to occur over their remaining life and required a cumulative-effect adjustment to the statement of financial position on January 1, 2020. The effect of the adoption of this standard was immaterial on our condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

Reclassifications of Prior Period Presentation—Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified in order to conform to the current period presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on the reported results of operations.


~~Note 3~~	~~— EARNINGS PER SHARE~~

Note 3— EARNINGS PER SHARE

Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. For purposes of determining diluted earnings per share, basic weighted-average common shares outstanding is adjusted to include potentially dilutive securities, including restricted stock, stock options, and performance units. The treasury-stock method is used to measure the dilutive impact of potentially dilutive shares. Potentially dilutive shares are excluded from the diluted weighted-average shares outstanding computation in periods in which they have an anti-dilutive effect. The following table shows the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share (in thousands, except per share amounts):


	Three Months Ended March 31,						Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2020			2019			2020		2019		2020		2019
Net (loss) income	$	(7,397	)	$	6,155	Net (loss) income	$	(10,175)	$	(217)	$	(26,444)	$	11,549

Basic weighted-average common shares outstanding	129,572			128,730		Basic weighted-average common shares outstanding	13,006		12,917		12,981		12,893
Add: Dilutive effect of restricted stock	—			2,033		Add: Dilutive effect of restricted stock	0		0		0		130
Add: Dilutive effect of stock options	—			117		Add: Dilutive effect of stock options	0		0		0		83
Add: Dilutive effect of performance units						Add: Dilutive effect of performance units	0		0		0		0
Diluted weighted-average common shares outstanding	129,572			130,880		Diluted weighted-average common shares outstanding	13,006		12,917		12,981		13,106


Basic	$	(0.06	)	$	0.05	Basic	$	(0.78)	$	(0.02)	$	(2.04)	$	0.90
Diluted	$	(0.06	)	$	0.05	Diluted	$	(0.78)	$	(0.02)	$	(2.04)	$	0.88

The following table shows the shares that have an anti-dilutive effect and are excluded from the diluted weighted-average shares outstanding computations (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended March 31,			Three Months Ended September 30,		Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2020	2019		2020	2019	2020	2019
Anti-dilutive effect of restricted stock	3,117	79	Anti-dilutive effect of restricted stock	289	225	233	41

Anti-dilutive effect of stock options outstanding	3,120	1,701	Anti-dilutive effect of stock options outstanding	310	322	311	166

Table of Contents

Note 4— CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS AND RESTRICTED CASH

Total cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, as shown on the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows are included in the following accounts at ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020, and 2019 (in thousands):


	September 30, 2020		September 30, 2019
Cash and cash equivalents	$	9,258	$	13,023
Restricted cash included in other current assets	150		150
Restricted cash included in other long-term assets	516		486
Total cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash as shown in the statement of cash flows	$	9,924	$	13,659

March 31, 2020 March 31, 2019
Cash and cash equivalents $ 44,371
$ 34,032
Restricted cash included in other current assets 150
—
Restricted cash included in other long-term assets 516
482
Total cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash as shown in the statement of cash flows $ 45,037
$ 34,514

Restricted cash included in other current and long-term assets on the condensed consolidated balance sheets represents amounts whose use is restricted by contractual agreements with various entities, principally the Bureau of Land Management or the State of Utah, as security to fund future reclamation obligations at our sites.

Note 5— INVENTORY AND LONG-TERM PARTS INVENTORY

The following summarizes our inventory, recorded at the lower of weighted-average cost or estimated net realizable value, as of ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020, and December 31, 2019 (in thousands):


	March 31, 2020		December 31, 2019			September 30, 2020		December 31, 2019
Finished goods product inventory	$	56,124	$	55,585	Finished goods product inventory	$	39,571	$	55,585
In-process mineral inventory	17,735		25,591
In-process inventory					In-process inventory	34,739		25,591
Total product inventory	73,859		81,176		Total product inventory	74,310		81,176
Current parts inventory, net	14,001		13,044		Current parts inventory, net	10,894		13,044
Total current inventory, net	87,860		94,220		Total current inventory, net	85,204		94,220
Long-term parts inventory, net	28,403		27,569		Long-term parts inventory, net	28,978		27,569
Total inventory, net	$	116,263	$	121,789	Total inventory, net	$	114,182	$	121,789

Parts inventory is shown net of estimated allowances for obsolescence of $1.1 million and $0.6 million as of ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020, and December 31, ~~2019.~~2019, respectively.

As a result of routine assessments of the lower of weighted-average cost or estimated net realizable value of our finished goods product inventory, we recorded inventory charges of ~~$0.6~~$1.2 million and $4.0 million for the three and nine months ~~March 31, 2020.~~ended September 30, 2020, respectively. For the three and nine months ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2019, we recorded no$1.5 million of such inventory charges.

Table of Contents


~~Note 6~~	~~— PROPERTY, PLANT, EQUIPMENT, AND MINERAL PROPERTIES~~

Note 6 — PROPERTY, PLANT, EQUIPMENT, AND MINERAL PROPERTIES

Property, plant, equipment, and mineral properties were comprised of the following (in thousands):


	March 31, 2020			December 31, 2019				September 30, 2020		December 31, 2019
Land	$	27,265		$	27,274		Land	$	27,263	$	27,274
Ponds and land improvements	66,081			65,992			Ponds and land improvements	66,742		65,992
Mineral properties and development costs	143,938			143,988			Mineral properties and development costs	143,955		143,988
Buildings and plant	81,593			81,468			Buildings and plant	81,702		81,468
Machinery and equipment	258,169			253,536			Machinery and equipment	264,596		253,536
Vehicles	6,177			6,222			Vehicles	5,958		6,222
Office equipment and improvements	9,235			9,136			Office equipment and improvements	9,733		9,136
Operating lease ROU assets	8,194			8,123			Operating lease ROU assets	8,289		8,123
Breeding stock							Breeding stock	260		0
Construction in progress	4,773			7,124			Construction in progress	2,815		7,124
Total property, plant, equipment, and mineral properties, gross	$	605,425		$	602,863		Total property, plant, equipment, and mineral properties, gross	$	611,313	$	602,863
Less: accumulated depreciation, depletion, and amortization	(233,368		)	(224,354		)	Less: accumulated depreciation, depletion, and amortization	(249,196)		(224,354)
Total property, plant, equipment, and mineral properties, net	$	372,057		$	378,509		Total property, plant, equipment, and mineral properties, net	$	362,117	$	378,509

In March 2020, we sold approximately 320 acres of land for $4.8 million. In connection with that sale, we recorded a gain of $4.7 million.

We incurred the following expenses for depreciation, depletion, and amortization, including expenses capitalized into inventory, for the following periods (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2020		2019		2020		2019
Depreciation	$	7,511	$	7,128	$	22,164	$	20,881
Depletion	710		705		2,599		2,812
Amortization of right of use assets	527		493		1,614		1,452
Total incurred	$	8,748	$	8,326	$	26,377	$	25,145

Note 7 — DEBT

Three Months Ended March 31,
2020 2019
Depreciation $ 7,291
$ 6,855
Depletion 1,752
1,418
Amortization of right of use assets 543
473
Total incurred $ 9,586
$ 8,746


~~Note 7~~	~~— DEBT~~

Senior Notes—As of ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020, we had outstanding ~~$50~~$15 million of ~~senior notes (the "Notes") consisting~~Series B Senior Notes, due on April 14, 2023.

In April 2020, we repaid our Series A Senior Notes ($20 million) at maturity. In July 2020, we repaid our Series C Senior Notes. As part of the ~~following series:~~

~~$20~~repayment, we repaid the full $15 million of Senior Notes, Series A, due April 16, 2020*principal along with a reduced make-whole payment of $1.9 million.

~~$15 million of Senior Notes, Series B, due April 14, 2023~~

~~$15 million of Senior Notes, Series C, due April 16, 2025~~

*We repaid the $20 million outstanding principal balance due on the Series A on April 16, 2020.

The agreement governing the Series B Senior Notes contains certain financial covenants, including the following:

•We are required to maintain a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.3 to 1.0 as of the last day of each quarter, measured based on the previous four quarters. Our fixed charge coverage ratio as of ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020, was ~~7.2~~3.0 to ~~1.0, therefore we were in compliance with this covenant.~~1.0.

•We are allowed a maximum leverage ratio of 3.5 to 1.0 as of the last day of each quarter, measured based on the previous four quarters. Our leverage ratio as of ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020, was ~~1.6~~2.1 to ~~1.0, therefore we were in compliance with this covenant.~~1.0.

Fixed charge coverage ratio and leverage ratio are calculated in accordance with the agreement governing the Senior B Notes, each of which includes earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization ("EBITDA") as a component. Our EBITDA calculation for the nine months ended September 30, 2020 has decreased from historical levels due to the economic contraction related to the COVID-19 pandemic. If we continue to experience decreased EBITDA amounts in future quarters, we may violate our debt covenants and may need to work with our lenders to address the non-compliance. EBITDA in all periods excludes deferred revenue as we have not satisfied the performance obligation to recognize the deferred revenue as revenue, as discussed in Note 11 - Revenue. As of September 30, 2020, we were in compliance with all applicable covenants under the Series B Senior Notes.

Table of Contents

For both the ~~three-month period~~nine months ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020, and the ~~three-month period~~nine months ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2019, the interest rates on the Senior Notes were 3.73% for the Series A Notes, 4.63% for the Series B Notes and 4.78% for the Series C Notes. These rates represent the lowest interest rates available under the Senior Notes. The interest rates may adjust upward if we do not continue to meet certain financial covenants.

We have granted to the collateral agent for the ~~noteholders~~Series B Senior Notes a first lien on substantially all of our non-current assets and a second lien on substantially all of our current assets. We are required to offer to prepay the Series B Senior Notes with the proceeds of dispositions of certain specified property and with the proceeds of certain equity issuances, as set forth in the agreement governing the Series B Senior Notes. The obligations under the Senior Notes are unconditionally guaranteed by several of our subsidiaries.

~~We were in compliance with the applicable covenants under the agreement governing the Notes as of March 31, 2020.~~

In April 2020, we amended the agreement governing the Series B Senior Notes ~~to add a debt basket~~ to allow for a $10 million loan under the Paycheck Protection Program under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (the "CARES Act"), as described further below.

Our outstanding long-term debt, net, as of ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020, and December 31, 2019, was as follows (in thousands):


	September 30, 2020		December 31, 2019
Notes and Payroll Protection Loan	$	25,000	$	50,000
Less current portion of long-term debt	(10,000)		(20,000)
Less deferred financing costs	(82)		(247)
Long-term debt, net	$	14,918	$	29,753

March 31, 2020 December 31, 2019
Notes $ 50,000
$ 50,000
Less current portion of long-term debt (20,000 ) (20,000 )
Less deferred financing costs (219 ) (247 )
Long-term debt, net $ 29,781
$ 29,753

Credit Facility—We maintain a revolving credit facility with Bank of Montreal. As of ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020, borrowings under the credit facility bear interest at LIBOR (London Interbank Offered Rate) plus an applicable margin of 1.25% to 2.00% per annum, based on ~~average availability under~~our leverage ratio as calculated in accordance with the agreement governing the credit facility. We have granted to Bank of Montreal a first lien on substantially all of our current assets and a second lien on substantially all of our non-current assets. The obligations under the credit facility are unconditionally guaranteed by several of our subsidiaries.

We occasionally borrow and repay amounts under the facility for near-term working capital needs or other purposes and may do so in the future. During the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020, we borrowed $10 ~~million and repaid $0~~ million under the facility. As of ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020, we had ~~$30~~$29.8 million of borrowings outstanding and $1 million in outstanding letters of credit under the facility. Including the outstanding letters of credit, we had ~~$44.2~~$30.0 million available to be borrowed under the facility as of ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020. We

Our EBITDA calculation for the nine months ended September 30, 2020 has decreased from historical levels due to the economic contraction related to the COVID-19 pandemic. If we continue to experience decreased EBITDA amounts in future quarters, we may violate our debt covenants and may need to work with our lenders to address the non-compliance. EBITDA in all periods excludes deferred revenue as we have not satisfied the performance obligation to recognize the deferred revenue as revenue, as discussed in Note 11 - Revenue. As of September 30, 2020, we were in compliance with ~~the~~all applicable covenants under the ~~facility as of March 31, 2020.~~revolving credit facility.

During the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2019, we had no$30.3 million borrowings under the facility and made no$10.5 million in repayments.

In August 2019, we amended the credit facility to change it from an asset-backed facility to a cash-flow facility, to increase the amount available under the facility from $50 million to $75 million plus an additional $75 million accordion, and to extend the maturity date to August 1, 2024.

In April 2020, we amended the credit facility ~~to add a debt basket~~ to allow for a $10 million loan under the CARES Act, described below.

Table of Contents

PPP Loan—In April 2020, we ~~applied for and~~ received a $10 million loan under the Paycheck Protection Program (the "PPP") under the CARES Act. The loan matures onin April ~~18,~~ 2022 and bears interest at a rate of 1% per annum. ~~Beginning November 18, 2020, we are~~We were required to ~~make~~begin monthly payments of principal and interest in the amount of $0.6 ~~million.~~million in November 2020, but due to extensions of the program and delays in the forgiveness application process, we do not expect to make any payments on the loan until a decision is made on our forgiveness application. We may prepay the loan at any time prior to maturity with no prepayment penalties. We ~~plan to fund~~used the funds exclusively for allowed payroll and benefits ~~or other allowed~~ expenses ~~under the program~~ and expect the majority of the loan, if not all, will be ~~forgiven pursuant~~forgiven. The loan contains customary events of default relating to, ~~current guidelines under~~among other things, payment defaults, making materially false and misleading representations to the lender or breaching the terms of the loan documents.

During the second quarter of 2020, the PPP was amended to allow borrowers to choose either an eight-week or 24-week period to use the funds. We elected to use the 24-week period, which ended in October 2020. The amount eligible for forgiveness is based on the amount of loan proceeds used by us (during the 24-week period after the lender makes the first disbursement of loan proceeds) for the payment of certain covered costs, including payroll costs (including benefits), subject to certain limitations and reductions in accordance with the CARES Act. We submitted our application for forgiveness of the full $10 million loan in November 2020. No assurance can be given that we will obtain forgiveness of the loan in whole or in part. In addition, as a borrower that received over $2.0 million, we expect to be subject to an audit to review our eligibility under the PPP. The timing and scope of the audit remains unclear and as a result we are not able to forecast when we can expect a decision on loan forgiveness. We do not expect the audit will impact our eligibility for forgiveness under the PPP.

Interest Expense—Interest expense is recorded net of any capitalized interest associated with investments in capital projects. We incurred gross interest expense of ~~$0.9~~$2.5 million and ~~$0.6~~$0.9 million for the three months ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020, and 2019, respectively, and $4.0 million and $2.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2020, and 2019, respectively.

Amounts included in interest expense, net for the three and nine months ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020, and 2019, were as follows (in thousands):


								Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	Three Months Ended March 31,							2020		2019		2020		2019
	2020			2019
Interest on Notes and credit facility	$	779		$	573
Interest on debt borrowings							Interest on debt borrowings	$	386	$	804	$	1,748	$	2,143
Make-whole payments							Make-whole payments	1,868		0		1,868		0
Amortization of deferred financing costs	86			68			Amortization of deferred financing costs	196		80		357		217
Gross interest expense	865			641			Gross interest expense	2,450		884		3,973		2,360
Less capitalized interest	(73		)	(38		)	Less capitalized interest	0		(35)		(96)		(102)
Interest expense, net	$	792		$	603		Interest expense, net	$	2,450	$	849	$	3,877	$	2,258

Table of Contents


~~Note 8~~	~~— INTANGIBLE ASSETS~~

Note 8 — INTANGIBLE ASSETS

We have water rights, recorded at $19.2 million at ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020, and December 31, 2019. Our water rights have indefinite lives and are not amortized. We evaluate our water rights at least annually on October 1 for impairment, or more frequently if circumstances require. With the economic slowdown as a result of the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, we reviewed our water rights for possible triggering events for impairment as of ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020 and concluded we do not ~~need to impair our water rights.~~have any triggering events.

We account for other intangible assets as finite-lived intangible assets and amortize those intangible assets over the period of estimated benefit, using the straight-line method. The weighted average amortization period for the other intangible assets is approximately 20 years. At ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020, and December 31, 2019, these intangible assets had a net book value of ~~$6.1~~$6.0 million and $6.2 million, respectively, and are included in "Other assets, net" on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.


~~Note 9~~	~~— FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR SUBSIDIARY GUARANTORS OF POSSIBLE FUTURE~~

Note 9— FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR SUBSIDIARY GUARANTORS OF POSSIBLE FUTURE

PUBLIC DEBT

Intrepid Potash, Inc., as the parent company, has no independent assets or operations, and operations are conducted solely through its subsidiaries. Cash generated from operations is held at the parent-company level as cash on hand and totaled ~~$44.4~~$9.3 million and $20.6 million at ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020, and December 31, 2019, respectively. If one or more of our wholly-owned operating subsidiaries guarantee public debt securities in the future, those guarantees will be full and unconditional and will constitute the joint and several obligations of the subsidiary guarantors. ~~Our~~The assets and liabilities of our other subsidiaries are ~~minor.~~immaterial. There are no restrictions on our ability to obtain cash dividends or other distributions of funds from the subsidiary guarantors, except those imposed by applicable law.


~~Note 10~~	~~— ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATION~~

Table of Contents

Note 10 — ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATION

We recognize an estimated liability for future costs associated with the abandonment and reclamation of our mining properties. A liability for the fair value of an asset retirement obligation and a corresponding increase to the carrying value of the related long-lived asset are recorded as the mining operations occur or the assets are acquired.

Our asset retirement obligation is based on the estimated cost to abandon and reclaim the mining operations, the economic life of the properties, and federal and state regulatory requirements. The liability is discounted using credit adjusted risk-free rate estimates at the time the liability is incurred or when there are upward revisions to estimated costs. The credit adjusted risk-free rates used to discount our abandonment liabilities range from 6.9% to 9.7%. Revisions to the liability occur due to construction of new or expanded facilities, changes in estimated abandonment costs or economic lives, or if federal or state regulators enact new requirements regarding the abandonment or reclamation of mines.

Following is a table of the changes to our asset retirement obligation for the following periods (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2020		2019		2020		2019
Asset retirement obligation, at beginning of period	$	23,003	$	23,959	$	22,250	$	23,125
Liabilities settled	0		0		(116)		0


Accretion of discount	434		513		1,303		1,347
Total asset retirement obligation, at end of period	$	23,437	$	24,472	$	23,437	$	24,472

Three Months Ended March 31,
2020 2019
Asset retirement obligation, at beginning of period $ 22,250
$ 23,125
Accretion of discount 435
417
Total asset retirement obligation, at end of period $ 22,685
$ 23,542

Table of Contents

~~The current portion of the asset retirement obligation of $0.1 million is included in "Other current liabilities" on the condensed consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2020.~~Note 11 — REVENUE


~~Note 11~~	~~— REVENUE~~

Revenue Recognition—We account for revenue in accordance with ASC Topic 606 Revenue from Contracts with Customers ("ASC 606"). Under ASC 606, we recognize revenue when control of the promised goods or services is transferred to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration we expect to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The timing of revenue recognition, billings, and cash collection may result in contract assets or contract liabilities.

Contract Balances: As of ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020, and December 31, 2019, we had ~~$17.1~~$26.5 million and $16.6 million of contract liabilities, respectively, which are included in "Other current liabilities" on the Condensed Consolidated Balance ~~Sheets. The timing of revenue recognition, billings, and~~Sheets, primarily related to cash ~~collection may result in contract assets or contract liabilities. For certain contracts, the~~advances received from a customer ~~has agreed to pay us before we have satisfied our performance obligations.~~for water purchases. Customer ~~payments~~advances received before we have satisfied our performance obligations are accounted for as a contract ~~liability.~~liability (sometimes referred to in practice as deferred revenue). We will recognize the deferred revenue at the time the customer calls for water delivery, which we expect will be sourced from our existing long-term water rights. Our ~~contract liability~~deferred revenue activity for the three and nine months ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020, and 2019 is shown below (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2020		2019		2020		2019
Beginning balance	$	22,690	$	10,643	$	16,612	$	11,678
Additions	3,883		3,816		13,529		7,343
Recognized as revenue during period	(71)		(1,054)		(3,639)		(5,616)
Ending balance	$	26,502	$	13,405	$	26,502	$	13,405

Three Months Ended March 31,
2020 2019
Beginning balance $ 16,612
$ 11,678
Additions 3,910
—
Recognized as revenue during period (3,436 ) (3,161 )
Ending balance $ 17,086
$ 8,517

Disaggregation of Revenue: The tables below show the disaggregation of revenue by product and reconciles disaggregated revenue to segment revenue for the three and nine months ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020, and 2019. We believe the disaggregation of revenue by products best depicts how the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows are affected by economic conditions (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended September 30, 2020
Product	Potash Segment		Trio® Segment		Oilfield Solutions Segment		Intersegment Eliminations		Total
Potash	$	18,575	$	0	$	0	$	(49)	$	18,526
Trio®	0		11,441		0		0		11,441
Water	262		1,312		2,037		0		3,611
Salt	1,995		137		0		0		2,132
Magnesium Chloride	1,127		0		0		0		1,127
Brine Water	228		0		105		0		333
Other	0		0		908		0		908
Total Revenue	$	22,187	$	12,890	$	3,050	$	(49)	$	38,078

	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2020
Product	Potash Segment		Trio® Segment		Oilfield Solutions Segment		Intersegment Eliminations		Total
Potash	$	69,942	$	0	$	0	$	(253)	$	69,689
Trio®	0		51,474		0		0		51,474
Water	957		2,963		10,727		0		14,647
Salt	5,792		285		0		0		6,077
Magnesium Chloride	2,838		0		0		0		2,838
Brine Water	975		0		297		0		1,272
Other	0		0		2,515		0		2,515
Total Revenue	$	80,504	$	54,722	$	13,539	$	(253)	$	148,512

Table of Contents


	Three Months Ended March 31, 2020												Three Months Ended September 30, 2019
Product	Potash Segment		Trio^® Segment		Oilfield Solutions Segment		Intersegment Eliminations			Total		Product	Potash Segment		Trio® Segment		Oilfield Solutions Segment		Intersegment Eliminations		Total
Potash	$	29,818	$	—	$	—	$	(129	)	$	29,689	Potash	$	24,242	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	24,242
Trio^®	—		21,201		—		—			21,201		Trio®	0		13,370		0		0		13,370
Water	583		1,247		6,661		—			8,491		Water	574		1,211		5,488		0		7,273
Salt	2,096		133		—		—			2,229		Salt	2,736		56		0		0		2,792
Magnesium Chloride	759		—		—		—			759		Magnesium Chloride	949		0		0		0		949
Brines	535		—		31		—			566
Brine Water												Brine Water	712		0		0		0		712
Other	—		—		1,049		—			1,049		Other	0		0		1,822		0		1,822
Total Revenue	$	33,791	$	22,581	$	7,741	$	(129	)	$	63,984	Total Revenue	$	29,213	$	14,637	$	7,310	$	0	$	51,160

													Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019
Product												Product	Potash Segment		Trio® Segment		Oilfield Solutions Segment		Intersegment Eliminations		Total
Potash												Potash	$	84,807	$	0	$	2,040	$	(1,319)	$	85,528
Trio®												Trio®	0		50,283		0		0		50,283
Water												Water	1,371		3,090		13,864		0		18,325
Salt												Salt	8,105		508		0		0		8,613
Magnesium Chloride												Magnesium Chloride	2,895		0		0		0		2,895
Brine Water												Brine Water	1,912		0		0		0		1,912
Other												Other	0		0		3,670		0		3,670
Total Revenue												Total Revenue	$	99,090	$	53,881	$	19,574	$	(1,319)	$	171,226

Three Months Ended March 31, 2019
Product Potash Segment
Trio^® Segment
Oilfield Solutions Segment Intersegment Eliminations Total
Potash $ 28,545
$ —
$ 1,822
$ (1,208 ) $ 29,159
Trio^®
—
16,550
—
—
16,550
Water 340
942
4,104
—
5,386
Salt 3,001
317
—
—
3,318
Magnesium Chloride 1,740
—
—
—
1,740
Brines 704
—
—
—
704
Other —
—
697
—
697
Total Revenue $ 34,330
$ 17,809
$ 6,623
$ (1,208 ) $ 57,554

Table of Contents

Note 12 — COMPENSATION PLANS


~~Note 12~~	~~— COMPENSATION PLANS~~

Equity Incentive Compensation Plan—Our Board of Directors and stockholders adopted a long-term incentive compensation plan called the Intrepid Potash, Inc. Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan (the "Plan"). The Plan was most recently amended and restated in May 2019. We have issued common stock, restricted stock, performance units, and non-qualified stock option awards under the Plan. At ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020, approximately ~~9.4~~0.8 million shares remained available for issuance under the Plan.

As of ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020, the following awards were outstanding under the ~~Plan:~~

Plan (in thousands):




						Outstanding as of ~~March 31,~~ September 30, 2020
Restricted Shares						~~1,840,557~~288

Non-qualified Stock Options						~~3,111,209~~310

Total share-based compensation expense was $1.0 million and $1.0 million for ~~both~~ the three months ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020, and ~~2019.~~2019, respectively, and $3.0 million and $3.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2020, and 2019, respectively. As of ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020, we had ~~$3.1~~$3.6 million of total remaining unrecognized compensation expense related to awards, that is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.1 years.


~~Note 13~~	~~— INCOME TAXES~~

Note 13 — INCOME TAXES

Our anticipated annual tax rate is impacted primarily by the amount of taxable income associated with each jurisdiction in which our income is subject to income tax, permanent differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and tax bases of assets and liabilities.

During the three months ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020, and 2019, we ~~realized~~incurred 0 income tax expense. During both the nine months ended September 30, 2020, and September 30, 2019, we incurred an immaterial amount of income tax ~~benefit and during the three months ended March 31, 2019, we incurred no income tax expense.~~benefit. Our effective tax rate for the three months ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020, and 2019, and the nine months ended September 30, 2020, and 2019 was 0%. Our effective tax rates differed from the statutory rate during each period primarily due to changes in the valuation allowance established to offset our deferred tax assets.


~~Note 14~~	~~— COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES~~

Note 14 — COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Reclamation Deposits and Surety Bonds—As of ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020, and December 31, 2019, we had $22.3 million of security placed principally with the State of Utah and the Bureau of Land Management for eventual reclamation of our various facilities. Of this total requirement, $0.5 million consisted of long-term restricted cash deposits reflected in "Other assets, net" on the condensed consolidated balance sheets and $21.8 million was secured by surety bonds issued by an insurer. The surety bonds are held in place by an annual fee paid to the issuer and a letter of credit.

We may be required to post additional security to fund future reclamation obligations as reclamation plans are updated or as governmental entities change requirements.

Legal—We are subject to claims and legal actions in the ordinary course of business. Legal costs are expensed as incurred. While there are uncertainties in predicting the outcome of any claim or legal action, except as noted below, we believe the ultimate resolution of these claims or actions is not reasonable likely to have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.

Mosaic Settlement

In ~~February 2015,~~March 2020, we entered into a definitive settlement agreement with Mosaic Potash Carlsbad Inc. ~~(“Mosaic”~~("Mosaic") ~~filed~~related to a complaint originally brought against us and ~~application for preliminary injunction and permanent injunction against~~ Steve Gamble ~~and us~~ in ~~the Fifth Judicial District Court for the County of Eddy in the State of New Mexico.~~February 2015. Mr. Gamble is a former employee of Intrepid and Mosaic. In August 2015, the court denied Mosaic’s application for preliminary injunction. In July 2016, Mosaic filed a second complaint against Mr. Gamble and us in U.S. District Court for the District of New Mexico. In January 2018, the two lawsuits were consolidated into one lawsuit pending in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Mexico. Mosaic alleged against us violations of the New Mexico Uniform Trade Secrets Act, tortious interference with contract relating to Mr. Gamble’s separation of employment from Mosaic, violations of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, conversion, and civil conspiracy relating to the alleged misappropriation of Mosaic’s confidential information and related actions. Mosaic sought $23 million to $28 million in compensatory damages, $28 million to $37 million in punitive damages, attorneys' fees, other injunctive relief, and future royalty damages in unspecified amounts.

In March 2020, Intrepid and Mosaic participated in a settlement conference facilitated by a U.S. Magistrate Judge in New Mexico. We agreed to settle the matter, subject to signing a final settlement agreement, and we expect final closing of the settlement in May 2020. Under the terms of the settlement agreement, we ~~will be obligated to pay~~paid Mosaic an aggregate of $10 million in May 2020 to dismiss all current and future claims arising from this matter ~~against. Upon signing of a final settlement agreement, this~~against us and the matter ~~will be~~is now closed. ~~In connection with the settlement, we accrued a $10 million payable in our condensed consolidated financial statements as of March 31, 2020.~~

Water Rights

In February 2019, Pecos Valley Artesian Conservancy District, Carlsbad Irrigation District, and Otis Mutual Domestic Water Consumers & Sewage Works Association (together, the "Protestants") filed an expedited inter se proceeding against us, Henry McDonald, Select Energy Services, LLC d/b/a Gregory Rockhouse Ranch, and Vision Resources, Inc. in

Table of Contents

the Fifth Judicial District Court for the County of Chaves in the State of New Mexico. This court serves as the adjudication court for the Pecos Stream System, which includes the Pecos River. The Protestants ~~challenge~~challenged the validity of our Pecos River water rights, representing approximately 20,000 acre feet per year. In August 2019, the parties stipulated to the jurisdiction of the adjudication court. To promote settlement, the adjudication court established a settlement schedule and ordered a trial date in August 2020 if the parties have not reached a settlement by that time. The trial date has since been rescheduled to ~~November~~December 2020, subject to the continued motions of the protestants. We were allowed to sell water associated with 5,700 acre feet per year of these water rights under preliminary authorizations issued in 2017 and 2018 by the New Mexico Office of the State Engineer ("OSE"). The preliminary authorizations allowed for water sales to begin immediately, subject to repayment, which can be made "in-kind" with water from our other water rights, if the ~~underlying~~Pecos River water rights are ultimately found to be invalid.

In ~~February 2020,~~December 2019, the protestants filed a Petition for Writ of Mandamus against the OSE concerning these permits, despite its agreed stipulation to jurisdiction of the adjudication court, also asking for unspecified monetary and injunctive relief, as well as attorneys' fees and costs, relating to ~~Intrepid’s~~our sale of water under these water rights and breach of contract claims. A hearing regarding this ~~Writ~~Petition was held in March 2020, and the non-adjudication court granted the Writ against the New Mexico State Engineer challenging the State Engineer's right to grant preliminary authorizations under the New Mexico ~~Water~~Water-Use Leasing Act. The non-adjudication court also denied our ~~due process~~ right to participate as a potentially harmed party. The non-adjudication court’s challenged ruling requires the OSE to withdraw and cancel certain preliminary authorizations the

OSE had issued to us. This challenged ruling by the non-adjudication court does not impact the validity of our water rights, but ~~potentially~~ limits our and our lessees ability to ~~sell~~use water under ~~two specific leases.~~certain leases, subject to challenge.

The OSE has filed a ~~Motion~~Petition for Writ of Superintending Control with the New Mexico Supreme Court seeking to reverse the decision by the non-adjudication court and stay any actions taken as a result of the Writ of Mandamus. We have filed a Petition for Writ of Superintending Control in the New Mexico Supreme Court seeking a reversal of the denial of Intrepid’s request to intervene and seeking to stay enforcement while the matter is being decided. While the New Mexico Supreme Court has not yet ruled on either of these motions, the OSE has withdrawn and cancelled certain preliminary authorizations the OSE had issued to us. Subsequently, on July 21, 2020, the OSE filed its State of New Mexico Response to CID/Otis's Motion for Summary Judgment, indicating our rights at up to 6,000 acre feet.

We are also subject to other claims and legal actions in the ordinary course of business. Legal costs are expensed as incurred. While there are uncertainties in predicting the outcome of any claim or legal action, we believe that the ultimate resolution of these other claims or actions is not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.


~~Note 15~~	~~— FAIR VALUE~~

Note 15 — FAIR VALUE

We measure our financial assets and liabilities in accordance with ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures.

As of ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020, and December 31, 2019, our cash consisted of bank deposits. Other financial assets and liabilities including accounts receivable, refundable income taxes, accounts payable, accrued liabilities, and advances on our credit facility are carried at cost which approximates fair value because of the short-term nature of these instruments.

In May of 2020, we acquired a non-controlling interest in W.D. Von Gonten Laboratories ("WDVGL") for $3.5 million. This investment is an equity investment without a readily determinable fair value and is recorded at cost with adjustments for observable changes in prices resulting from orderly transactions for the identical or a similar investment of the same issuer or impairment (a Level 3 input), and is included in "Other assets, net" on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. We did not record any adjustments to the $3.5 million carrying value of the investment during the third quarter of 2020.

As of ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020, and December 31, 2019, the estimated fair value of our outstanding Notes was ~~$48.3~~$14.8 million and $50 million, respectively. The fair value of our Notes is estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis based on current borrowing rates for debt with similar remaining maturities and ratings (a Level 2 input) and is designed to approximate the amount at which the instruments could be exchanged in an arm's-length transaction between knowledgeable willing parties.

Table of Contents


~~Note 16~~	~~— BUSINESS SEGMENTS~~

Note 16 — BUSINESS SEGMENTS

Our operations are organized into ~~three~~3 segments: potash, Trio^®and oilfield solutions. The reportable segments are determined by management based on several factors including the types of products and services sold, production processes, markets served and the financial information available for our chief operating decision maker. We evaluate performance based on the gross margins of the respective business segments and do not allocate corporate selling and administrative expenses, among others, to the respective segments. Intersegment sales prices are market-based and are eliminated in the "Other" column. Information for each segment is provided in the tables that follow (in thousands).

Table of Contents


Three Months Ended March 31, 2020	Potash		Trio^®			Oilfield Solutions		Other			Consolidated
Three Months Ended September 30, 2020													Three Months Ended September 30, 2020	Potash		Trio®		Oilfield Solutions		Other		Consolidated
Sales	$	33,791	$	22,581		$	7,741	$	(129	)	$	63,984	Sales	$	22,187	$	12,890	$	3,050	$	(49)	$	38,078
Less: Freight costs	5,441		6,548			—		(129		)	11,860		Less: Freight costs	3,973		3,878		0		(49)		7,802
Warehousing and handling costs	1,296		1,608			—		—			2,904		Warehousing and handling costs	1,173		1,142		0		0		2,315
Cost of goods sold	22,720		17,430			2,897		—			43,047		Cost of goods sold	14,928		8,754		3,363		0		27,045
Lower of cost or net realizable value inventory adjustments	—		550					—			550		Lower of cost or net realizable value inventory adjustments	760		464		0		—		1,224

Gross Margin (Deficit)	$	4,334	$	(3,555	)	$	4,844	$	—		$	5,623	Gross Margin (Deficit)	$	1,353	$	(1,348)	$	(313)	$	0	$	(308)
Depreciation, depletion, and amortization incurred¹	$	7,312	$	1,508		$	632	$	214		$	9,666	Depreciation, depletion, and amortization incurred1	$	6,430	$	1,531	$	657	$	210	$	8,828

Three Months Ended March 31, 2019	Potash		Trio^®			Oilfield Solutions		Other			Consolidated
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2020													Nine Months Ended September 30, 2020	Potash		Trio®		Oilfield Solutions		Other		Consolidated
Sales	$	34,330	$	17,809		$	6,623	$	(1,208	)	$	57,554	Sales	$	80,504	$	54,722	$	13,539	$	(253)	$	148,512
Less: Freight costs	4,640		5,035			781		—			10,456		Less: Freight costs	12,700		15,950		0		(253)		28,397
Warehousing and handling costs	1,267		969			—		—			2,236		Warehousing and handling costs	3,673		3,611		0		0		7,284
Cost of goods sold	19,059		11,074			2,769		(1,208		)	31,694		Cost of goods sold	55,298		40,405		8,397		0		104,100
Lower of cost or net realizable value inventory adjustments													Lower of cost or net realizable value inventory adjustments	1,130		2,885		0		—		4,015

Gross Margin (Deficit)													Gross Margin (Deficit)	$	7,703	$	(8,129)	$	5,142	$	0	$	4,716
Depreciation, depletion, and amortization incurred1													Depreciation, depletion, and amortization incurred1	$	19,485	$	4,556	$	1,945	$	632	$	26,618

Three Months Ended September 30, 2019													Three Months Ended September 30, 2019	Potash		Trio®		Oilfield Solutions		Other		Consolidated
Sales													Sales	$	29,213	$	14,637	$	7,310	$	0	$	51,160
Less: Freight costs													Less: Freight costs	4,728		3,996		0		—		8,724
Warehousing and handling costs													Warehousing and handling costs	1,190		972		0		0		2,162
Cost of goods sold													Cost of goods sold	18,707		9,315		3,841		0		31,863
Lower of cost or net realizable value inventory adjustments													Lower of cost or net realizable value inventory adjustments	—		1,462		0		—		1,462

Gross Margin (Deficit)													Gross Margin (Deficit)	$	4,588	$	(1,108)	$	3,469	$	0	$	6,949
Depreciation, depletion, and amortization incurred1													Depreciation, depletion, and amortization incurred1	$	6,048	$	1,517	$	747	$	202	$	8,514

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019													Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019	Potash		Trio®		Oilfield Solutions		Other		Consolidated
Sales													Sales	$	99,090	$	53,881	$	19,574	$	(1,319)	$	171,226
Less: Freight costs													Less: Freight costs	14,110		15,502		861		—		30,473
Warehousing and handling costs													Warehousing and handling costs	3,776		2,852		0		0		6,628
Cost of goods sold													Cost of goods sold	59,024		32,988		8,682		(1,319)		99,375
Lower of cost or net realizable value inventory adjustments													Lower of cost or net realizable value inventory adjustments	—		1,462		0		—		1,462

Gross Margin	$	9,364	$	731		$	3,073	$	—		$	13,168	Gross Margin	$	22,180	$	1,077	$	10,031	$	0	$	33,288
Depreciation, depletion, and amortization incurred¹	$	6,795	$	1,558		$	190	$	203		$	8,746
Depreciation, depletion and amortization incurred1													Depreciation, depletion and amortization incurred1	$	18,963	$	4,595	$	1,170	$	605	$	25,333

¹⁹

Table of Contents

1Depreciation, depletion, and amortization incurred for potash and Trio^® excludes depreciation, depletion and amortization amounts absorbed in or relieved from inventory.

Table of Contents


~~ITEM 2.~~	~~MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION~~

ITEM 2.MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION

AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (this "Quarterly Report") contains ~~forward‑looking~~forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), and the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. These ~~forward‑looking~~forward-looking statements are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements in this Quarterly Report other than statements of historical fact are ~~forward‑looking~~forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements include statements about our future results of operations and financial position, our business strategy and plans, and our objectives for future operations, among other things. In some cases, you can identify these statements by ~~forward‑looking~~forward-looking words, such as "estimate," "expect," "anticipate," "project," "plan," "intend," "believe," "forecast," "foresee," "likely," "may," "should," "goal," "target," "might," "will," "could," "predict," and "continue." ~~Forward‑looking~~Forward-looking statements are only predictions based on our current knowledge, expectations, and projections about future events.

These forward-looking statements are subject to a number of risks, uncertainties, and assumptions, including the following:

•changes in the price, demand, or supply of our products and services;

•challenges to our water rights;


•	~~our ability to successfully identify and implement any opportunities to grow our business whether through expanded sales of water, Trio~~^®~~, byproducts, and other non-potassium related products or other revenue diversification activities;~~

•our ability to successfully identify and implement any opportunities to grow our business whether through expanded sales of water, Trio®, byproducts, and other non-potassium related products or other revenue diversification activities;

•our ability to integrate the Intrepid South assets into our existing business and achieve the expected benefits of the acquisition;


•	~~our ability to sell Trio~~^® ~~internationally and manage risks associated with international sales, including pricing pressure and freight costs;~~

•our ability to sell Trio® internationally and manage risks associated with international sales, including pricing pressure and freight costs;

•the costs of, and our ability to successfully execute, any strategic projects;

•declines or changes in agricultural production or fertilizer application rates;

•declines in the use of potassium-related products or water by oil and gas companies in their drilling operations;

•our ability to prevail in outstanding legal proceedings against us;

•our ability to comply with the terms of our senior notes and our revolving credit facility, including the underlying covenants, to avoid a default under those agreements;

•further write-downs of the carrying value of assets, including inventories;

•circumstances that disrupt or limit production, including operational difficulties or variances, geological or geotechnical variances, equipment failures, environmental hazards, and other unexpected events or problems;

•changes in reserve estimates;

•currency fluctuations;

•adverse changes in economic conditions or credit markets;

•the impact of governmental regulations, including environmental and mining regulations, the enforcement of those regulations, and governmental policy changes;

•adverse weather events, including events affecting precipitation and evaporation rates at our solar solution mines;

•increased labor costs or difficulties in hiring and retaining qualified employees and contractors, including workers with mining, mineral processing, or construction expertise;

•changes in the prices of raw materials, including chemicals, natural gas, and power;

•our ability to obtain and maintain any necessary governmental permits or leases relating to current or future operations;

•interruptions in rail or truck transportation services, or fluctuations in the costs of these services;

•our inability to fund necessary capital investments;

Table of Contents

•the impact of the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic on our business, operations, liquidity, financial condition and results of operations; and

~~our ability to regain compliance with the continued listing criteria of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”); and~~

•the other risks, uncertainties, and assumptions described in Item 1A. Risk Factors of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019, as updated by our subsequent Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, including Item 1A. Risk Factors of ~~the~~this Quarterly Report.

In addition, new risks emerge from time to time. It is not possible for our management to predict all risks that may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements we may make.

In light of these risks, uncertainties, and assumptions, the future events and trends discussed in this Quarterly Report may not occur and actual results could differ materially and adversely from those anticipated or implied in these forward-looking statements. As a result, you should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. We undertake no duty to update or revise publicly any forward-looking statements to conform those statements to actual results or to reflect new information or future events.

Throughout this Quarterly Report, we refer to average net realized sales price per ton, which is a non-GAAP financial measure. More information about this measure, including a reconciliation of this measure to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure, is below under the heading "Non-GAAP Financial Measure."

Table of Contents

Company Overview

We are a diversified mineral company that delivers potassium, magnesium, sulfur, salt, and water products essential for customer success in agriculture, animal feed and the oil and gas industry. We are the only U.S. producer of muriate of potash (sometimes referred to as potassium chloride, KCl or potash), which is applied as an essential nutrient for healthy crop development, utilized in several industrial applications, and used as an ingredient in animal feed. In addition, we produce a specialty fertilizer, Trio^®, which delivers three key nutrients, potassium, magnesium, and sulfate, in a single particle. We also provide water, magnesium chloride, brine and various oilfield products and services.

Our extraction and production operations are conducted entirely in the continental United States. We produce potash from three solution mining facilities: our HB solution mine in Carlsbad, New Mexico, our solution mine in Moab, Utah, and our brine recovery mine in Wendover, Utah. We also operate our North compaction facility in Carlsbad, New Mexico, which compacts and granulates product from the HB mine. We produce Trio^® from our conventional underground East mine in Carlsbad, New Mexico.

We have water rights in New Mexico under which we sell water primarily to support oil and gas development in the Permian Basin near our Carlsbad facilities. We continue to work to expand our sales of water. In May 2019, we acquired certain land, water rights, state grazing leases for cattle, and other related assets from Dinwiddie Cattle Company. We refer to these assets and operations as "Intrepid South." ~~As of May 1, 2020, certain issues identified in the diligence process were not resolved by Dinwiddie Cattle Company or others. As a result, we were not required to pay any additional money relating~~Due to the ~~acquisition.~~strategic location of Intrepid South, part of our long-term operating strategy is selling small parcels of land to other companies, where such sales provide a solution to a company's need.

We have three segments: potash, Trio^®, and oilfield solutions. We account for the sale of byproducts as revenue in the potash or Trio^® segment based on which segment generated the byproduct.

Recent Developments

~~New York~~Reverse Stock ~~Exchange Notice~~Split

On ~~April 17,~~July 24, 2020, we received notice from the NYSE that we were ~~no longer~~not in compliance with Section 802.01C of the NYSE Listed Company Manual ~~(“Section 802.01C”)~~ that requires listed companies to maintain an average closing share price of at least $1.00 over a period of 30 consecutive trading days (the ~~“Notice”~~“July Notice”). ~~Pursuant~~Due to ~~Section 802.01C,~~our reduced stock price, before we ~~generally have~~received notice of non-compliance we provided notice of a ~~period~~special meeting of ~~six months following~~stockholders to vote on four proposals that would allow our Board of Directors to effect a reverse stock split at a ratio between 1:3 and 1:15. On July 28, 2020, we held the ~~receipt~~special meeting and all the reverse stock split proposals were approved.

On August 10, 2020, the Board of ~~the Notice~~Directors approved an amendment to ~~regain compliance with the minimum share price requirement, subject~~our Certificate of Incorporation to ~~any extensions by NYSE. We can regain compliance with the minimum share price requirement at any time during the cure period if, on the last trading day~~effect a reverse stock split of ~~any calendar month during the cure period or on the last day of the cure period, we have a closing share price of at least $1.00~~our common stock, par value $0.001 per share, ~~and an average closing~~by a ratio of one-for-ten. The reverse stock split became effective August 14, 2020. Additionally, the total number of authorized shares of our common stock was reduced to 40,000,000 shares. Unless otherwise indicated, all share ~~price of at least $1.00~~amounts, per share ~~over~~data, share prices, exercise prices and conversion rates set forth in these notes and the ~~30 trading-day period ending on such date. As required~~accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have, where applicable, been adjusted retroactively to reflect this reverse stock split.

We believe the reverse stock split was in the best interests of us and our stockholders by allowing us more flexibility to, among other things, potentially improve the ~~NYSE, we have notified the NYSE~~marketability and liquidity of our ~~intent to cure the listing standard deficiency~~common stock and regain compliance with the minimum share price requirement. We intend to consider all available options to cure the deficiency and restore compliance, and we are currently in compliance with all other NYSE continued listing standard rules. For more information, please see Item 1A. “Risk Factors” under the caption “~~If we cannot meet the continued~~ listing requirements of the NYSE, ~~the~~which will allow management to focus on our business strategy. We received notice from NYSE ~~may delist our common stock.”~~that we regained compliance with all listing standards on September 1, 2020.

Table of Contents

Significant Business Trends and Activities

A The novel strain of coronavirus (COVID-19) ~~was first identified in Wuhan, China in December 2019, and subsequently declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization. To date, COVID-19~~ has surfaced in nearly all regions around the world. ~~We have been deemed~~As an essential business ~~and have~~we continued to operate through-out the COVID-19 pandemic to produce potash and Trio^® and serve oil and gas markets through our oilfield solutions business. The safety and protection of our workforce is our first and foremost priority. We ~~have implemented~~continue to follow various procedures we implemented to help minimize the risks to our employees, including changes in our operating procedures to accommodate social distancing guidelines, additional cleaning and disinfection procedures and requiring those employees who can work from home to do so.

We continue to monitor the ~~rapidly evolving situation and~~ guidance from various authorities, including federal, state and local public health authorities and may take additional actions based on their recommendations. There may be developments outside our control that would require us to adjust our operating plans.

~~Although our first~~ Our second and third quarter results were ~~not~~ materially impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic, ~~given~~particularly our oilfield solutions segment as many of the actions taken to help prevent the spread of COVID-19 decreased demand for oil. Many areas of the country began to reopen beginning in the second quarter of 2020. However, governmental authorities may reinstate other restrictive orders due to a continued resurgence of COVID-19 related cases. Such restrictive actions may lead to further or continued decreases in the demand for oil and may impact our other operations if expanded restrictions are deemed necessary to mitigate the public health effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. Given the dynamic nature of this situation, we cannot reasonably estimate the impacts of COVID-19 on our financial condition, results of operations, liquidity or cash flows in the future. We do expect that itif governmental authorities increase other restrictive orders, such actions will have a material effect on revenue growth, financial condition, liquidity, and overall profitability ~~particularly for our oilfield solutions segment~~ in future reporting periods.

Our financial results have been, or are expected to be, impacted by several significant trends and activities, including impacts from the ~~recent~~ COVID-19 pandemic, as discussed below. We expect that the trends described below may continue to impact our results of operations, cash flows, and financial position.

• Potash pricing and demand. Potash sales volumes in the ~~first~~third quarter of 2020 ~~benefited from mild~~decreased 15% compared to the third quarter of 2019 as good early season weather ~~in the regions in which we sell, advancing~~accelerated the spring application season in ~~those areas as compared to an average year. Total potash~~many parts of the country, pushing some 2020 agricultural tons ~~sold increased by 13%~~forward into the first and second quarters. For the nine months ended September 30, 2020 sales volume was down 8% compared to the ~~first quarter~~same period in the prior year as increases in agricultural and feed sales were offset by a significant decrease in industrial potash sales, due in large part to the impacts of ~~2019~~the COVID-19 pandemic. Actions taken in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, such as ~~increased agricultural sales volumes more than offset~~work from home and limiting travel, have decreased the demand for oil and subsequently reduced ~~industrial sales.~~oil and gas drilling activities.

Our potash average net realized sales price per ton decreased to ~~$255~~$238 for the three months ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020, compared to ~~$288~~$266 for the same period in 2019. For the nine months ended September 30, 2020 our potash average net realized sale price per ton decreased to $251, compared to $285 for the same period of 2019, as price decreases from ~~both the 2019 summer fill program~~recent summer-fill programs and the ~~winter fill~~winter-fill program announced in January 2020 lowered overall price levels. ~~Price~~In June 2020, a summer-fill program was announced by our competitors that lowered the price $40 per ton and $30 per ton in the corn belt and western United States, respectively, from current list prices. After the summer-fill order window closed, list price increased $15 per ton. We sold at summer-fill pricing levels through the third quarter and we expect to achieve the increased bypricing midway through the fourth quarter. In late October, we increased potash price an additional $15 to $20 per ton, ~~in late January after the order window closed for the 2020 winter fill program and we realized~~depending on region. We expect to achieve this ~~pricing~~price on spot sales in the ~~western United States. However, pricing pressure remains in~~fourth quarter, but this could be affected by, among other ~~parts~~things, weather, planting decisions, rail car availability, commodity price decreases as a result of ~~the country and the economic impacts and uncertainty from~~ the COVID-19 pandemic, ~~may lead to reduced demand~~ and ~~limit our ability to achieve this higher pricing in~~ the ~~future.~~price and availability of other potassium products.

With potash sales comprising ~~46%~~47% of our total sales in the first ~~quarter~~nine months of 2020, potash prices continue to be a significant driver of our profitability. Pricing of our potash is influenced principally by the price established by our competitors. The interaction of global potash supply and demand, ocean, land, and barge freight rates, and currency fluctuations also influence pricing.

Table of Contents

We experience seasonality in potash demand, with more purchases historically occurring in March through May and September through November when purchasers are looking to have product on hand for the spring and fall application seasons in the United States. Further actions taken in response to the COVID-19 pandemic may also impact seasonal demand patterns if there is an effect on available labor, transportation logistics, or supply disruptions. The combination of these items results in variability inVarious factors affect potash sales and shipments, thereby increasing volatility of sales volumes from quarter to quarter and season to season. The specific timing of when farmers apply potash remains highly weather dependent and varies across the numerous growing regions within the U.S. Mild weather during the late winter and early spring months of 2020 across much of the United States accelerated the 2020 spring application season as compared to the 2019 spring application season. The timing of potash sales is also significantly influenced by the marketing programs of potash producers, as well as storage volumes closer to the farm gate. Our sales volumes into the industrial market correlate to drilling activity in the oil and gas ~~market.~~market, which has slowed significantly during 2020 due to the containment actions taken to help reduce the spread of COVID-19. Any further containment actions taken in response to the COVID-19 pandemic may impact the traditional fall fertilizer application season if such actions affect available labor, transportation logistics, or cause supply disruptions.

• Trio^® pricing and demand. Our Trio^®average net realized sales price per ton decreased 6%7% during the ~~first~~third quarter of 2020, as compared to the ~~first~~third quarter of 2019, due ~~primarily~~ to ~~lower domestic pricing.~~

~~During~~ the ~~first quarter of 2020, domestic Trio~~^® ~~pricing was negatively impacted by a~~ summer-fill program announced by our competitor in ~~July 2019, lowering their~~June 2020. This summer-fill program further decreased Trio® list ~~price~~prices by ~~$35~~$15 to ~~$50~~$20 per ton, ~~depending on product grade. Two subsequent attempts to increase Trio~~^® ~~pricing, after~~for orders delivered through the end of the third quarter. After the summer-fill window closed, Trio® price increased $15 per ton and ~~again~~we expect to recognize the increased prices midway through the fourth quarter of 2020. In late October, we increased our Trio® price an additional $10 per ton. We expect to achieve this price on spot sales in the fourth quarter, ~~of 2019, failed~~but our ability to gain traction with buyers. Shortly after the winter-fill program was announced for potash in January 2020, our competitor announced a new langbeinite pricing program which reduced delivered price for langbeinite to the price offered during the summer fill program. After the order window closed for this pricing program, our competitor's list price increased by $10 per ton. We matched this pricing, effectively maintaining summer-fill pricing for tons delivered in the first quarter of 2020. We expect to achieverecognize the increased ~~price midway through the second quarter, but this could~~prices may be affected by, among other things, weather, planting decisions, rail car availability, commodity price decreases as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, and the price and availability of other potassium products.

Our Trio^®average net realized sales price per ton decreased 2% for the nine months ended September 30, 2020 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2019, as decreases in domestic pricing were partially offset by less international sales. We recognize a lower average net realized sales price per ton for international sales compared to domestic sales, due to the increased freight costs to ship Trio® to international destinations.

Trio® sales volume increased ~~36%~~4% during the first ~~quarter~~nine months of 2020, compared to the first ~~quarter~~nine months of 2019, as good weather in most of our domestic markets ~~has advanced the~~resulted in a strong 2020 spring application season ~~as compared~~and reduced pricing from the summer-fill program led to ~~an average year. First~~strong third quarter ~~2019~~volumes in the domestic market. Domestic sales in 2019 were reduced due to wet weather which ~~delayed~~negatively impacted the 2019 spring application season. ~~International sales also increased during~~We continued to sell fewer tons into international markets in the ~~first~~third quarter, ~~of 2020,~~ as compared to the ~~first~~third quarter of 2019, due to the timing of ~~shipments.~~shipments and as we pursue a more limited international sales strategy.

We also experience seasonality in domestic Trio^® demand, with more purchases coming in the first and second quarters in advance of the spring application season in the U.S. In turn, we generally have increased inventory levels in the third and fourth quarters in anticipation of expected demand for the following year. Further actions taken in response to the COVID-19 pandemic may also impact seasonal demand patterns if there is an effect on available labor, transportation logistics, or supply disruptions. We continue to operate our facilities at production levels that approximate expected demand and allow us to manage inventory levels. Certain products rely more heavily on international markets, particularly standard Trio^®. Our international warehouse temporarily closed in response to the COVID-19 pandemic in the first quarter and was reopened during the second quarter and currently remains open, but we may see additional closures with the continued resurgence of COVID-19 related ~~to COVID-19 in future periods~~cases, which could reduce ~~demand. If~~demand in future periods. We reduced the production of fine langbeinite in the second quarter of 2020 to manage inventory levels and if we experience reduced demand for Trio^®due to warehouse closures or other effects from the COVID-19 pandemic, we may ~~have~~need to ~~reduce~~continue to operate at reduced production rates to manage inventory levels.

• Water sales. In the ~~first three months~~third quarter of 2020, total water sales were ~~$8.5~~$3.6 million compared to ~~$5.4~~$7.3 million during the same period of 2019. ~~Water sales increased due~~While most shelter-in-place orders were relaxed towards the end of the second quarter and economic activity and oil demand began to ~~strong demand and~~rebound, there continues to be significant impacts from the ~~acquisition of additional water rights~~COVID-19 pandemic as part of Intrepid South, which allowed us to sell more water. We continue our efforts to diversify our sources of income by expanding our water sales and increasing the amount of water permitted for sale, particularly to service the oil and gas ~~markets near our operating plants. Recent decreases~~drilling activity in the ~~price and demand for oil as a result of excess supply from major oil producing countries and a decrease~~areas in ~~demand due~~which we operate has not yet returned to the ~~effects~~levels seen prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. In addition, in October 2020 positive cases of COVID-19 are increasing in most areas of the ~~COVID-19 pandemic have led most operators~~United States, which could lead to ~~announce reductions to their 2020 capital~~reinstating restrictive orders in states and ~~operating plans. The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted~~major cities. Such restrictions would negatively impact the demand for oil in the fourth quarter of 2020 or beyond.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019, total water sales were $14.6 million and $18.3 million, respectively. The decrease in water sales through the third quarter of 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic's impact on oil and gas drilling activity was partially offset by operating Intrepid South for the full nine month period in 2020, compared to only five months of operations in the nine month period of 2019, as shelter-in-place orders have been issued across most major metropolitan areas, significantly reducing automobile and airline travel, two major consumers of oil. In addition, most states have required non-essential businesses to close and employees to work from home wherever possible. While shelter-in-place orders could be relaxed in many states beginningwe purchased the Intrepid South assets in May ~~the extent to which these restrictions are relaxed and the subsequent response from businesses and individuals remains uncertain as does the ultimate trajectory~~2019.

Table of the easing of restrictions over time. It is possible that subsequent shelter-in-place restrictions could be reinstated in states and major cities at a later date if there is a resurgence of cases related to COVID-19.Contents

We expect the planned reduction in drilling activities by operators will ~~reduce~~continue to impact our sales of water ~~sales~~and other oilfield products and services through at least the remainder of 2020. We have seen a slight increase in rig counts in the ~~second quarter,~~Permian basin in September and ~~likely into~~October from the ~~second half of~~ 2020 ~~although~~rig count lows established in August. However, mounting oil stockpiles and continued slowing oil demand due to the ~~unprecedented~~economic conditions resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic make forecasting future ~~demand~~drilling activities difficult. ~~Given this uncertainty, we are suspending our 2020 water guidance.~~

Water rights in New Mexico are subject to a stated purpose and place of use, and many of ~~Intrepid’s~~our water rights were originally issued for uses relating to our mining operations. When water rights temporarily exceed the originally permitted use, ~~Intrepid~~we and other persons or entities with New Mexico water rights are able to sell water for alternative uses, such as ~~sand/gravel, road~~ construction, ~~municipalities, farmers, ranchers~~farming, ranching and oil and gas development, thereby ensuring the highest and best use of New Mexico water that ~~would~~may otherwise go ~~unused or make its way to Texas.~~unused. When applicable ~~Intrepid,~~we, or any other New Mexico water right holder, applies for a permit from the New Mexico Office of the State Engineer ("OSE") to change the purpose and/or place of use of the underlying water rights. The OSE reviews and makes a determination as to the validity of the right and if it determines the requested change will not negatively impact other valid interests, the OSE may issue a preliminary authorization for the change. The preliminary authorization allows for water sales to begin immediately, subject to repayment if the underlying water rights were ultimately found to be invalid, thereby ensuring the highest and best use of New Mexico water that ~~would~~may otherwise go ~~unused or make its way to Texas.~~unused. Third parties may protest the preliminary authorization at minimal cost and frequently do so. Once protested, the OSE is required to hold a hearing to determine if the preliminary authorization was appropriate. Since 2017, ~~Intrepid has~~we have faced a protest of our rights to use water from the Pecos River from numerous parties. ~~Intrepid has~~We have a strong historical and legal basis supporting 19,836 acre feet of water rights on the Pecos River. ~~While some parties have challenged Intrepid’s entire water right, recent~~See Note 14 - Commitments and ~~historic analysis from the New Mexico State Engineer’s Water Rights Division indicates Intrepid rights to a minimum of 6,062 acre feet of established rights.~~

Significant current and historic use of New Mexico Pecos River water rights comes from water sales made under preliminary authorizations issued by the OSE, both for Intrepid and many other New Mexico water rights users. Third parties have protested these preliminary authorizations, and the OSE is required to hold a hearing on the protests. In February 2019, certain protestants filed an inter se proceeding in New Mexico District Court at the Pecos Stream System Adjudication Court challenging the validity of certain of Intrepid’s New Mexico Pecos River water rights. In August 2019, all of the parties, including Intrepid and the protestants, stipulatedContingencies to the ~~jurisdiction~~Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in Part I of the adjudication court. To promote settlement, the adjudication court established a settlement schedule and ordered a trial date in August 2020 if the parties have not reached a settlement by that time. The trial date has since been rescheduled to November 2020, subject to the continued motions of the protestants. Preliminary authorizations allowthis Quarterly Report for water sales to begin immediately, subject to repayment if the underlying water rights are ultimately found to be invalid. Separate from the adjudication proceeding, the protestants have challenged these preliminary authorizations before the OSE. Although the OSE is required to hold a hearing relating to the protests, it has temporarily stayed the hearing process in this matter until the agreed-upon adjudication process is complete. In the adjudication proceeding, the court is expected to make a determination as to the size of Intrepid's Pecos River water rights.

In February 2020, the protestant CID/Otis filed a Writ of Mandamus against the OSE concerning these permits, despite its agreed stipulation to jurisdiction of the adjudication court also asking for unspecified monetary and injunctive relief, as well as attorneys' fees and costs, relating to Intrepid’s sale of water under these water rights and breach of contract claims. A hearingfurther details regarding this Writ was held in March 2020, and the non-adjudication court granted the Writ against the New Mexico State Engineer challenging the State Engineer's right to grant preliminary authorizations under the New Mexico Water Leasing Act. The non-adjudication court also denied Intrepid’s due process right to participate as a potentially harmed party. The non-adjudication court’s challenged ruling requires the New Mexico State Engineer to withdraw and cancel certain preliminary authorizations the New Mexico State Engineer had issued to Intrepid. This challenged ruling by the non-adjudication court does not impact the validity of Intrepid's water rights, nor does it impact our ability to deliver water at

numerous other locations. It potentially limits Intrepid’s ability to use water under two specific leases, subject to challenge, but does not affect Intrepid’s continuing ability to utilize the subject diversion points to service other water rights.

The New Mexico Office of State Engineer has filed a Motion for Writ of Superintending Control with the New Mexico Supreme Court seeking to reverse the decision by the non-adjudication court and stay any actions taken as a result of the Writ of Mandamus.

The challenged ruling by the non-adjudication court only affects leases, not the underlying rights, on two points of diversion on the Pecos river and does not affect Intrepid's ability to produce potash or Trio^®. As stated, Intrepid was denied the right to intervene and challenge both the jurisdiction, grounds and legitimacy of the non-adjudication court in this matter and has filed for a Writ of Superintending Control in the New Mexico Supreme Court seeking a reversal of the denial of Intrepid’s request to intervene and seeking to stay enforcement while the matter is being decided. Also as stated, the OSE has filed for a writ of Superintending Control in the New Mexico Supreme Court seeking to assert its jurisdiction over permitting under the Water Leasing Act. Both petitions seek a stay of the Writ of Mandamus issued by the non-adjudication court. These petitions are currently pending, and the adjudication court has scheduled the underlying issue regarding adjudication of the validity of the subject water rights for November of 2020. We continue to vigorously defend our legal position with respect to the validitydisputes of our water ~~rights in all forums and assert the proper jurisdiction of the adjudication court in determining the validity and extent of Intrepid’s water rights in this matter.~~rights.

We may face other political and regulatory issues relating to the potential use of the maximum amount of our rights. However, we believe that our legal position with respect to the validity of our water rights is solid and that we will be able to meet our water commitments.

• Byproduct sales. We sell byproducts such as salt, magnesium chloride, brines, and water that are derived from our potash and Trio^® operations. Byproduct sales were ~~$5.4~~$5.1 million for the three months ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020, compared to ~~$7.0~~$6.2 million for the three months ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2019. Byproduct sales were $13.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2020, compared to $17.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2019. The decrease during the third quarter of 2020 was primarily due to a ~~$1.1~~$0.7 million decrease in salt sales and a ~~$1.0~~$0.5 million decrease in brine sales, offset by a $0.2 million increase in sales of magnesium ~~chloride sales.~~chloride. Salt availability improved in certain regions of the country in the ~~first~~third quarter of 2020, compared to the same period in 2019, which reduced our sales ~~footprint. Our~~footprint while overall brine sales ~~of magnesium chloride~~ were ~~reduced~~down significantly due to ~~limited product available for sale in~~ the ~~first quarter~~impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on oil and gas activity, as discussed above. Good evaporation rates during the summer of 2020 ~~as a result of the significant wet weather in Wendover during 2019.~~

~~We expect~~increased magnesium chloride production and sales compared to ~~return~~the prior year.

The decrease in byproduct sales during the first nine months of 2020 was due to a $2.5 million decrease in salt sales, a decrease of $0.9 million in brine water sales, and a decrease of $0.5 million in byproduct water sales. Improved salt availability in certain regions of the country in 2020 has reduced our sales footprint. The decrease in byproduct brine water and byproduct water sales was due to impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on oil and gas activity, as discussed above.

Magnesium chloride production and sales returned to historic rates towards the end of the second quarter of 2020 and through the third quarter of 2020, and we expect that will continue for the rest of the year assuming average ~~evaporation~~precipitation rates at our Wendover facility. ~~Recent decreases in oil prices~~We continue to experience decreased demand for water and ~~reduced capital forecasts for oil~~other oilfield products and ~~gas operators~~services as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic ~~are likely~~and expect this to ~~reduce our water and brine sales in~~continue for at least the ~~near term.~~remainder of 2020.

• Diversification of products and services. We continue to diversify our products and services, particularly on our Intrepid South property. In addition to water sales, Intrepid South generates revenue from right-of-way agreements, surface damages and easements, caliche sales, ~~and~~ a produced water ~~royalty.~~royalty, and sales of cattle. As part of the Intrepid South acquisition, we acquired state grazing leases and submitted a comprehensive grazing plan which is currently pending approval with the New Mexico State Land Office. In the third quarter, we purchased an 400-head commercial cattle herd which we plan to move to our grazing leases when we receive final approval. We added a brine station at our Intrepid South property in February 2020 and are ~~currently developing~~reviewing opportunities to develop a produced water facility, ~~with a partner near Intrepid South,~~ although the expectation of reduced oil and gas operations due to the recent decrease in the price and demand for oil due to the COVID-19 pandemic have made the timing of this development uncertain. Demand for our high-speed mixing service has also been negatively impacted as a result of the decrease in oil ~~price~~prices and oilfield ~~activity. As~~activities.

In March 2020, we ~~continue~~sold approximately 320 acres of fee land from our Intrepid South property for $4.8 million and recognized a gain on the sale of the land of $4.7 million. The terms of the sale were highly restrictive and only allow the

Table of Contents

buyer to ~~diversify~~drill Acid Gas Injection ("AGI") wells on the property to dispose of natural gas with high concentrations of hydrogen sulfide ("H2S"). No water rights were included in the land sale, we retained surface access, and we restricted the use of caliche located on the property to the acreage that was sold in order to prevent sales to third parties or decrease future sales to the buyer. Our long-term strategic operating plan for Intrepid South includes selling small parcels of land to other companies, where such sales provide a solution to a company's needs. We may have additional strategic sales of small parcels of land in the future.

In May 2020, we acquired an 11% equity stake in the W.D. Von Gonten Laboratories ("WDVGL"), a global industry leader in drilling and completion chemistry and a strong supporter of the use of potassium chloride in oil and gas drilling and completion activities. With this investment we plan to revitalize our ~~portfolio, we~~industrial sales and high-speed mixing service given the poor performance of clay-inhibition chemical substitutes in certain formations. Our investment in WDVGL is also part of our strategy to leverage our existing oil and gas midstream businesses in southeast New Mexico and expand into additional oil and gas midstream and upstream activities. This expansion may ~~enter into new~~be through organic growth, other strategic investments, partnerships, or acquisitions of complementary businesses that expand our product and service offerings beyond our existing assets or ~~products~~products. We believe that the long-term investment opportunities in the current market are generational and provide a unique opportunity to accelerate our pivot towards oil and gas through ~~acquisition of companies or assets or otherwise.~~accretive transactions. Additionally, we may expand into oil and natural gas exploration and production or into new products or services in our current industry or other industries.

Table of Contents

Consolidated Results


(in thousands, except per ton amounts)	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2020		2019		2020		2019
Sales1	$	38,078	$	51,160	$	148,512	$	171,226

Cost of goods sold	$	27,045	$	31,863	$	104,100	$	99,375

Gross (Deficit) Margin	$	(308)	$	6,949	$	4,716	$	33,288

Selling and administrative	$	6,750	$	5,548	$	20,022	$	17,710

Net (Loss) Income	$	(10,175)	$	(217)	$	(26,444)	$	11,549

Average net realized sales price per ton2
Potash	$	238	$	266	$	251	$	285
Trio®	$	189	$	204	$	197	$	201

(in thousands, except per ton amounts) Three Months Ended March 31,
2020 2019
Sales¹
$ 63,984
$ 57,554

Cost of goods sold $ 43,047
$ 31,694

Gross Margin $ 5,623
$ 13,168

Selling and administrative $ 6,599
$ 5,807

Net (Loss) Income $ (7,397 ) $ 6,155

Average net realized sales price per ton²

Potash $ 255
$ 288
Trio^®
$ 193
$ 206

¹Sales include sales of byproducts which were ~~$5.4~~$5.1 million and ~~$7.0~~$6.2 million for the three months ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020, and 2019, respectively, and $13.8 million and $17.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2020, and 2019, respectively.

²Average net realized sales price per ton is a non-GAAP financial measure. More information about this non-GAAP financial measure is below under the heading "Non-GAAP Financial Measure."

Consolidated Results for the Three Months Ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020, and 2019

Our total sales for the three months ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020, ~~increased $6.4~~decreased $13.1 million, or ~~11%~~26%, as compared to the three months ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2019. ~~Combined,~~Our potash sales decreased $5.7 million, or 24%, during the third quarter of 2020 as compared to the third quarter of 2019, as we sold 15% fewer tons and our ~~potash and Trio~~^®~~sales increased $5.2 million due to an increase in sales volume, partially offset by a decrease in the~~ average net realized sales ~~prices for both products.~~

~~Water sales increased $3.1 million~~price per ton decreased 11% in the ~~first~~third quarter of 2020. We sold fewer tons of potash into the agricultural and industrial markets in the third quarter of 2020 compared to the third quarter of 2019, partially offset by selling more tons of potash into the feed market. Our competitors announced a summer-fill program in June 2020 that lowered the list price $20 per ton and $10 per ton for the corn belt and western United States, respectively, when compared to winter-fill per ton pricing from the first quarter of 2020. Most of our third quarter 2020 potash sales were sold at the summer-fill pricing.

Our Trio® sales decreased $1.9 million, or 14%, in the third quarter of 2020, as compared to the third quarter of 2019, as we sold 13% fewer tons and our average net realized sales price per ton decreased 7%. Our Trio® tons sold decreased in the third quarter of 2020, as compared to the third quarter of 2019, as we sold fewer tons into international markets, due to our continued focus on the domestic Trio® market. Our average net realized sales price per ton decreased as our competitor announced a summer-fill program in June 2020 that lowered Trio® list prices $15 to $20 per ton for orders delivered through the end of the third quarter.

Our water sales, excluding byproduct water sales, decreased $3.5 million, or 63%, in the third quarter of 2020, compared to the third quarter of 2019. Our water sales continued to be negatively impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic, which has significantly decreased oil demand and decreased oil and gas activities. We expect our water sales will continue to be negatively impacted in the fourth quarter of 2020, due to the continued economic effects of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Our byproduct sales decreased $1.1 million in the third quarter of 2020, compared to the third quarter of 2019, due to a $0.7 million decrease in salt sales, a $0.5 million decrease in byproduct brine water sales, and $0.2 million decrease in byproduct water sales, partially offset by an $0.2 million increase in magnesium chloride sales. Byproduct water and byproduct brine water sales decreased due to the negative economic effects on the oil and gas industry related to the COVID-19 pandemic. We expect byproduct water sales and byproduct brine water sales will continue to be negatively impacted in the fourth quarter of 2020, due to the continued economic effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. Byproduct salt sales decreased as salt availability improved in certain parts of the U.S. which reduced our geographic footprint for salt sales. Magnesium chloride sales improved $0.2 million as above average evaporation during the summer of 2020 improved product availability.

Cost of Goods Sold

Our total cost of goods sold decreased $4.8 million, or 15%, during the third quarter of 2020 compared to the third quarter of 2019. Our potash cost of goods sold decreased by $3.8 million, or 20%, during the third quarter of 2020 compared to the third quarter of 2019, driven mainly by a 15% decrease in potash tons sold. Our Trio® cost of goods sold decreased $0.6

Table of Contents

million, or 6%, for the three months ended September 30, 2020 as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2019, due mainly to a 13% decrease in Trio® tons sold. Our cost of goods sold for the Oilfield Solutions Segment decreased $0.5 million, or 12%, for the three months ended September 30, 2020 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2019. This decrease was due mainly to incurring less water transfer costs during the third quarter 2020 compared to the third quarter 2019, as we sold less water during the third quarter of 2020 compared to the third quarter of 2019.

Gross Margin

During the third quarter of 2020, we generated a negative gross margin of $0.3 million compared to a positive gross margin of $6.9 million during the third quarter of 2019, driven by a 26% decrease in sales in third quarter 2020 sales compared to third quarter 2019 sales, as discussed above. Our gross margin for our potash segment decreased $3.2 million during third quarter of 2020 compared to the third quarter of 2020, due to lower potash average net realized sales price per ton. Our oilfield solutions segment gross margin decreased $3.8 million during the third quarter of 2020 compared to the third quarter of 2019, as the negative economic effects on the oil and gas industry due to the Covid-19 pandemic resulted in a 58% decrease in oilfield segment sales.

Selling and Administrative Expense

During the third quarter of 2020, our selling and administrative expenses increased $1.2 million, or 22%, as compared to the third quarter 2019. The increase was due mainly to increased legal costs associated with protests over the validity of certain of our water rights and costs incurred to permit certain water rights at our Intrepid South property.

Interest Expense

During the third quarter of 2020, our interest expense increased $1.6 million as compared to the third quarter 2019. The increase was due to the $1.9 million make-whole payment we incurred related to the early pay-off of our Series C Notes in July 2020. The increase was partially offset by having paid-off the principal balance at maturity on our Series A Notes in April 2020.

Net Income

We generated a net loss of $10.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2020, compared to a net loss of $0.2 million in the same period in 2019, due to the factors discussed above.

Consolidated Results for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2020, and 2019

Our total sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2020, decreased $22.7 million or 13%, as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2019. Our potash sales during the first nine months of 2020 decreased $15.8 million, or 19%, compared to the first nine months of 2019, as we sold 8% fewer tons of potash combined with an 12% decrease in our average net realized sales price per ton. We sold 70% fewer tons of potash into the industrial market in 2020 compared to 2019, as the negative economic impacts from the COVID-19 pandemic reduced oil and gas drilling activities. Our average net realized sales price per ton declined in 2020 as competitors announced price decreases in January 2020 for a winter-fill program and announced further price decreases in June 2020 for a summer-fill program.

Our Trio® sales increased $1.2 million or 2% during the nine months ended September 30, 2020 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2019. We sold 4% more tons of Trio® during the first nine months of 2020 compared to the first nine months of 2019, but our Trio® average net realized sales price per ton decreased 2%. Our increase in Trio® tons sold was driven by increased domestic sales during the first nine months of 2020, compared to the first nine months of 2019, as we focused our sales on the higher priced domestic market. Our competitor announced price decreases in January 2020 related to a winter-fill program and further price decreases in June 2020 related to a summer-fill program, which lower our average net realized sales price per ton during 2020.

Water sales, ~~increased due~~excluding byproduct water sales, decreased $3.1 million, or 23%, in the nine months ended September 30, 2020, compared to ~~strong demand along~~ the ~~Pecos River and the acquisition of additional water rights as part of Intrepid South, which allowed us to sell more water.~~nine months ended September 30, 2019. Our ~~first quarter~~2020 water sales were ~~not~~ materially impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic as significant decreases in the demand for oil and the subsequent decreases in oil and gas ~~activity didn't occur until later in the quarter.~~activities reduced water demand. We expect a decrease in water sales will continue inat least through the ~~near-term due to decreases in oil and gas activity~~remainder of 2020 as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic.

~~Increases~~Our sales of other oilfield solution segment offerings, including high-speed potash mixing services, caliche, brine water, right-of-way agreements, surface damages and easements, decreased $0.9 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2020, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2019. This decrease was due to a $1.2 million decrease in sales of high-speed potash ~~Trio~~^® ~~and water sales were~~mixing services, partially offset by a ~~$1.1~~$0.3 million increase in surface damages and easements revenue. The decrease in ~~salt~~high-speed potash mixing services is due to the negative economic effects of the COVID-19 pandemic which have reduced the demand for oil and decreased oil production activities. The increase in surface damages and easements revenue is

Table of Contents

due to operating Intrepid South for nine months in 2020 compared to five months in 2019, as the assets at Intrepid South were purchased in May 2019.

Our total byproduct sales ~~and a $1.0~~decreased $4.1 million, ~~decrease in magnesium chloride sales. During~~or 23%, for the ~~first quarter of~~nine months ended September 30, 2020, as compared to the ~~first quarter of~~nine months ended September 30, 2019. Our byproduct salt sales decreased $2.5 million, or 29%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2020, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2019, as salt availability improved in certain regions of the country reducing our geographic footprint for salt sales. ~~Significant wet weather at~~Our byproduct brine water sales and our ~~Wendover facility limited~~byproduct water sales decreased $0.9 million, and $0.5 million, respectively, during the ~~production of magnesium chloride and the product available for sale in the first quarter of~~nine months ended September 30, 2020, as compared to the ~~first quarter~~nine months ended September 30, 2019, due the decrease in oil and gas drilling activities resulting from the negative economic effects of ~~2019.~~

~~Gross margin decreased by $7.5 million, or 57%, for~~ the ~~year-over-year three-month periods ended March 31, due to factors discussed above and below.~~COVID-19 pandemic.

Cost of Goods Sold

Our cost of goods sold increased ~~36%~~$4.7 million, or 5%, during the first ~~quarter~~nine months of 2020 compared to the first ~~quarter of 2019, as potash and Trio~~^®sales volumes increased 13% and 36%, respectively. Below average evaporation during 2019 at our potash facilities resulted in higher per ton cost of goods sold during the first quarter of 2020, as compared to the first quarternine months of 2019. Our Trio^® cost of goods sold increased in$7.4 million, or 22% during the ~~first quarter of~~nine months ended September 30 2020, compared to the ~~first quarter of~~same period in 2019, ~~due to increased~~ as Trio® sales volumes increased 4% and we reduced production of Trio® tons by 15% in order to manage our ~~product sales mix. In the first quarter~~inventory levels. Because a majority of ~~2020, as compared to the first quarter of 2019,~~our production costs are fixed, reductions in tons produced results in a higher per ton production cost. Finally, we sold a higher percentage of premium Trio^® tons ~~which carry~~in the nine months ended September 30, 2020, compared to the same period in 2019. Our Trio® premium has a higher per ton carrying cost than our other Trio^® products. ~~Finally,~~

Our potash cost of goods sold decreased $3.7 million, or 6%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2020, compared to the same period in 2019, due to selling 8% fewer potash tons in the nine months ended September 30, 2020, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2019.

Our oilfield solutions cost of goods sold decreased 3%, or $0.3 million, for the nine months ended September 30, 2020, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2019, as reduced expense related to our high-speed mixing service was partially offset by increased water transfer expense and increased depreciation expense as we acquired the Intrepid South assets in May 2019.

Gross Margin

During the first nine months of 2020, we generated a gross margin of $4.7 million compared to a gross margin of $33.3 million for the first nine months of 2019. Our decrease in gross margin was driven by an 12% decrease in average net realized sales price per ton for potash, a 20% decrease in total water sales, and a 5% increase in cost of goods sold, as discussed above. Additionally, during the first nine months of 2020, we recorded $4.0 million of lower of cost or net realizable value inventory adjustments due to declining potash and Trio® prices, compared to $1.5 million for same period in 2019.

Gain on Sale of an Asset

In March 2020, we sold approximately 320 acres of fee land from our Intrepid South property for $4.8 million and recognized a gain on the sale of the land of $4.7 million. The terms of the sale were highly restrictive and only allow the buyer to drill Acid Gas Injection (AGI) wells on the property to dispose of natural gas with high concentrations of hydrogen sulfide (H2S). No water rights were included in the land sale, we retained surface access, and we restricted the use of caliche located on the property to the acreage that was sold in order to prevent sales to third parties or decrease future sales to the buyer. Our long-term strategic operating plan for Intrepid South includes selling small parcels of land to other companies, where such sales provide a solution to a company's needs. We may have additional strategic sales of small parcels of land in the future.

Litigation Settlement

A settlement conference was held with Mosaic in late March 2020 related to ongoing litigation. Intrepid and Mosaic agreed to settle the matter and we paid Mosaic an aggregate of $10 million to dismiss all claims against us in this litigation, and the matter is now closed. Please see further information in Note 14 - Commitments and Contingencies in the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in Part I of this Quarterly Report.

Selling and Administrative Expense

During the first nine months of 2020, selling and administrative expenses increased 13% as compared to the first nine months of 2019. The increase was mainly due to increased legal costs associated with the settlement agreement with Mosaic as discussed above, and increased legal costs related to protests over the validity of certain of our water rights and to permit certain water rights at our Intrepid South property.

Net Income

We generated a net loss of $26.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2020, compared to net income of $11.5 million in the same period in 2019, due to the factors discussed above.

Table of Contents

Potash Segment


	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
(in thousands, except per ton amounts)	2020		2019		2020		2019
Sales1	$	22,187	$	29,213	$	80,504	$	99,090
Less: Freight costs	3,973		4,728		12,700		14,110
Warehousing and handling costs	1,173		1,190		3,673		3,776
Cost of goods sold	14,928		18,707		55,298		59,024
Lower of cost or net realizable value inventory adjustments	760		—		1,130		—

Gross Margin	$	1,353	$	4,588	$	7,703	$	22,180
Depreciation, depletion, and amortization incurred2	$	6,430	$	6,048	$	19,485	$	18,963

Potash sales volumes (in tons)	66		78		239		261
Potash production volumes (in tons)	61		51		202		217

Average potash net realized sales price per ton3	$	238	$	266	$	251	$	285

1 Sales include sales of byproducts which were $3.6 million and $5.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2020, and 2019, respectively, and $10.6 million and $14.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2020, and 2019, respectively.

2 Depreciation, depletion, and amortization incurred excludes depreciation, depletion, and amortization amounts absorbed in or (relieved from) inventory.

3Average net realized per ton sales price per ton is a non-GAAP financial measure. More information about this measure is below under the heading "Non-GAAP Financial Measure."

Three Months Ended September 30, 2020, and 2019

Potash segment sales in the third quarter of 2020 decreased compared to the same period in 2019, due to a 15% decrease in sales volume, a 11% decrease in our average net realized sales price per ton and a $1.4 million decrease in byproduct sales. Agricultural sales volumes decreased in the third quarter of 2020 compared to the third quarter of 2019, as we sold fewer tons into the summer-fill program than during the previous year. We also sold fewer tons into the industrial market. Our industrial potash sales were negatively impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic as oil demand decreased significantly leading to decreased oil and gas activity. Average net realized sales price per ton was lower due to price decreases announced in the summer of 2019, the winter-fill program announced in January 2020, and the summer-fill program announced in June 2020, and due to lower industrial sales volume. Reduced oil and gas activity also led to a reduction in byproduct water and brine sales in 2020, compared to 2019. Salt sales decreased compared to 2019 as salt availability improved in certain regions of the country which reduced our sales footprint. Magnesium chloride sales improved $0.2 million compared to the third quarter of 2019 as above average evaporation during the summer of 2020 improved product availability.

Potash segment freight expense decreased $0.8 million, or 16%, in the third quarter of 2020, compared to the third quarter of 2019 as a result of decreased sales volume of potash. Our freight expense is impacted by the geographic distribution of our potash and byproduct sales and by the proportion of customers arranging for and paying their own freight costs.

Our potash segment cost of goods sold decreased 20% in the third quarter of 2020, compared to the same period in 2019, due to a 15% decrease in potash sales volume.

Potash production increased 20% compared to the third quarter of 2019 as good evaporation during the summer of 2020, allowed for an earlier start to the production season at our Wendover facility.

Our potash segment gross margin decreased $3.2 million in the third quarter of 2020, compared to the same period in 2019, due to the decrease in average net realized sales price per ton, decreased potash sales volumes, and a decrease in byproduct sales.

Table of Contents

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2020, and 2019

Potash segment sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2020 decreased compared to the same period in 2019, due to a 8% decrease in sales volume, an 12% decrease in our average net realized sales price per ton, and a $3.7 million decrease in byproduct sales. Industrial sales volume decreased 70% as our industrial potash sales were negatively impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic as oil demand decreased significantly leading to decreased oil and gas activity. Historically, our industrial potash sales carried a higher average net realized sales price per ton, and the decrease in industrial potash sales negatively impacted our overall potash average net realized sales price per ton. Agricultural volumes were 5% less than prior year as we sold fewer tons into the 2020 summer-fill program than the previous year, partially offset by a 28% increase in tons sold into the feed market. Average net realized sales price per ton was lower due to price decreases announced in the summer of 2019, the winter-fill program announced in January 2020, the summer-fill program announced in June 2020, and lower industrial sales volume. Byproduct sales decreased as reduced oil and gas activity resulted in decreased byproduct water and brine sales. Salt sales decreased compared to 2019 as salt availability improved in certain regions of the country in the third quarter of 2020 which reduced our sales footprint. Magnesium chloride sales were similar to the prior year.

Potash segment freight expense decreased $1.4 million, or 10%, in the first nine months of 2020, compared to the first nine months of 2019 as a result of decreased sales volume of potash. Our freight expense is impacted by the geographic distribution of our potash and byproduct sales and by the proportion of customers arranging for and paying their own freight costs.

Our potash segment cost of goods sold decreased 6% compared to the prior year mainly due to reduced sales volumes.

Potash production decreased 7% in the first nine months of 2020 compared to the first nine months of 2019 due to reduced evaporation during the 2019 evaporation season, which limited our production in the spring of 2020. This was offset by good evaporation during the summer of 2020, particularly at our Utah facilities, which allowed for an earlier start to the production season at our Wendover facility and partially reduced the year-to-date variance.

Our potash segment gross margin decreased $14.5 million in the first nine months of 2020, compared to the same period in 2019, due to the decrease in average net realized sales price per ton, decreased potash sales volumes, and a decrease in byproduct sales.

Additional Information Relating to Potash

The table below shows our potash sales mix for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020, and 2019:


	Three Months Ended September 30,		Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2020	2019	2020	2019
Agricultural	77%	81%	79%	76%
Industrial	2%	6%	4%	12%
Feed	21%	13%	17%	12%

Table of Contents

Trio® Segment


	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
(in thousands, except per ton amounts)	2020		2019		2020		2019
Sales1	$	12,890	$	14,637	$	54,722	$	53,881
Less: Freight costs	3,878		3,996		15,950		15,502
Warehousing and handling costs	1,142		972		3,611		2,852
Cost of goods sold	8,754		9,315		40,405		32,988
Lower of cost or net realizable value inventory adjustments	464		1,462		2,885		1,462

Gross (Deficit) Margin	$	(1,348)	$	(1,108)	$	(8,129)	$	1,077
Depreciation, depletion, and amortization incurred2	$	1,531	$	1,517	$	4,556	$	4,595

Sales volumes (in tons)	40		46		180		173
Production volumes (in tons)	55		54		155		183

Average Trio® net realized sales price per ton3	$	189	$	204	$	197	$	201

1 Sales include sales of byproducts which were $1.4 million and $1.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2020, and 2019, respectively, and $3.2 million and $3.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2020, and 2019, respectively.

2 Depreciation, depletion, and amortization incurred excludes depreciation, depletion, and amortization amounts absorbed in or (relieved from) inventory.

3Average net realized per ton sales price per ton is a non-GAAP financial measure. More information about this measure, is below under the heading "Non-GAAP Financial Measure."

Three Months Ended September 30, 2020, and 2019

Trio® segment sales decreased 12% for the three months ended September 30, 2020, as compared to the same period in 2019. The decrease was primarily due to a 13% decrease in Trio® tons sold and a 7% decrease in average net realized sales price per ton. Sales volumes decreased as we continued to sell fewer tons into international markets as we focus on the higher priced domestic market. Our Trio® average net realized sales price per ton decreased during the third quarter of 2020 as compared to the third quarter of 2019 due to decreased pricing announced during the summer-fill program.

Trio® freight costs decreased 3% in the third quarter of 2020, compared to the third quarter of 2019, due to the decrease in total sales volumes. Our freight expense is impacted by the geographic distribution of our Trio® sales and by the proportion of customers arranging for and paying their own freight costs.

Our Trio® cost of goods sold decreased 6% in the third quarter of 2020, compared to the third quarter of 2019 as increased per-ton production costs were offset by reduced sales volumes. During the third quarter of 2020, we continued to run at reduced production rates to manage inventory levels.

We recorded a $0.5 million lower of cost or net realizable value inventory adjustment due to reduced production rates that increased our per-ton cost of production. We recorded a $1.5 million lower of cost or net realizable value inventory adjustment in the third quarter of 2019 on product moved to an off-site warehouse for a future international shipment.

Our Trio® production volume increased 2% in the third quarter of 2020, compared to the third quarter of 2019, as we converted more tons of work-in-process to premium Trio®.

Our Trio® segment generated a negative gross margin of $1.3 million in the third quarter of 2020, compared to a negative gross margin of $1.1 million in the third quarter of 2019, due to the factors discussed above.

Table of Contents

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2020, and 2019

Trio® segment sales increased 2% for the nine months ended September 30, 2020, as compared to the same period in 2019. The increase was primarily due to a 4% increase in Trio® tons sold, offset partially by reduced byproduct sales of water and salt, and a lower average net realized sales price for Trio®. Increased sales volume was a result of strong domestic sales offset by a decrease in international sales volume. Our Trio® average net realized sales price per ton decreased compared to the prior period due to the price decreases related to the summer-fill program announced in June 2020.

Trio® freight costs increased 3% in the first nine months of 2020, compared to the first nine months of 2019, due to the increase in total sales volumes. Our freight expense is impacted by the geographic distribution of our Trio® sales and by the proportion of customers arranging for and paying their own freight costs.

Our Trio® cost of goods sold increased 22% in the first nine months of 2020, compared to the first nine months of 2019. During the first nine months of 2020, sales volume increased 4% and we operated at reduced rates to manage inventory levels and experienced increased losses in our pelletization process, both which led to higher per-ton carrying costs. Also, in the first nine months of 2019, a higher ~~portion~~percentage of our tons sold had been written down in prior quarters through lower of cost or net realizable value adjustments which resulted in lower per ton costs of product sold.

We recorded a $2.9 million lower of cost or net realizable value inventory adjustment in the first nine months of 2020, primarily due to the summer-fill price announced by our competitor in June 2020 which lowered the list price on Trio® by $15-$20 per ton. We expect to sell at these reduced prices until midway through the fourth quarter of 2020.

~~Gain~~ Our Trio® production volume decreased 15% compared to the first nine months of 2019, due to reduced production rates, fewer tons of work-in-process inventory converted to premium Trio®, and increased losses in our pelletization process.

Our Trio® segment generated a negative gross margin of $8.1 million in the first nine months of 2020, compared to a gross margin of $1.1 million in the first nine months of 2019, due to the factors discussed above.

Additional Information Relating to Trio®

The percentage of Trio® tons sold into the export market decreased during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020, compared to the same period in 2019, due to our increased focus on ~~Sale~~domestic shipments and variability in the timing of ~~an Asset~~shipments to international customers.


	United States	Export
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2020	88%	12%
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2020	84%	16%

For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2019	86%	14%
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019	77%	23%

Oilfield Solutions Segment


	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
(in thousands)	2020		2019		2020		2019
Sales	$	3,050	$	7,310	$	13,539	$	19,574
Less: Freight costs	—		—		—		861

Cost of goods sold	3,363		3,841		8,397		8,682


Gross (Deficit) Margin	$	(313)	$	3,469	$	5,142	$	10,031
Depreciation, depletion, and amortization incurred	$	657	$	747	$	1,945	$	1,170

Three Months Ended September 30, 2020, and 2019

Our oilfield solutions segment sales decreased $4.3 million in the third quarter of 2020, compared to the same period in 2019, mainly due to a $3.5 million decrease in water sales and a $0.8 million decrease in sales of other oilfield products and services. Our oilfield solutions water sales and sales of other oilfield products and services decreased as the COVID-19 pandemic reduced oil prices and reduced oil and gas completion activity. We expect the COVID-19 pandemic and related global economic conditions will reduce sales of water and other oilfield products and services through at least the fourth quarter

Table of Contents

of 2020. Water that we sell that was used in the production of potash and Trio® is accounted for as byproduct water sales in the potash or Trio® segments.

Cost of goods sold decreased 12%, or $0.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2019, compared to the three months ended September 30, 2020, primarily a result of reduced water transfer expense.

Gross margin for the three months ended September 30, 2020, decreased $3.8 million compared to the prior year, due to the factors discussed above.

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2020, and 2019

Our oilfield solutions segment sales decreased $6.0 million in the first nine months of 2020, compared to the same period in 2019, mainly due to a $3.1 million decrease in water sales and a $2.0 million decrease in potash used in our high-speed mixing service. Our oilfield solutions water and potash sales decreased the COVID-19 pandemic pressured oil prices and reduced oil and gas completion activity. Water that we sell that was used in the production of potash and Trio® is accounted for as byproduct water sales in the potash or Trio® segments.

Cost of goods sold decreased 3%, or $0.3 million, for the nine months ended September 30, 2020, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2019, as reduced expense related to our high-speed mixing service was offset by increased water transfer expense and increased depreciation expense as we acquired the Intrepid South assets in May 2019.

Gross margin decreased $4.9 million for the first nine months of 2020, compared to the first nine months of 2019, due to the factors discussed above.

In March 2020, we sold approximately 320 acres of fee land from our Intrepid South property for $4.8 million and recognized a gain on the sale of the land of $4.7 million. The terms of the sale were highly restrictive and only allow the buyer to drill Acid Gas Injection (AGI) wells on the property to dispose of natural gas with high concentrations of hydrogen sulfide (H2S). No water rights were included in the land sale, we retained surface access, and we restricted the use of caliche located on the property to the acreage that was sold in order to prevent sales to third parties or decrease future sales to this customer. Our long-term strategic operating plan for Intrepid South includes selling small parcels of land to other companies, where such sales provide a solution to a company's needs. We anticipate we will continue to have additional strategic sales of small parcels of land in the future.

~~Litigation Settlement~~

A settlement conference was held with Mosaic in late March 2020 related to ongoing litigation. Intrepid and Mosaic agreed to settle the matter, subject to signing a final settlement agreement, rather than continue devoting financial and legal resources to its continuation, and the parties expect final closing of the settlement in May 2020. Under the terms of the settlement we will pay Mosaic an aggregate of $10 million to dismiss all claims against us in this litigation. Upon signing of a final settlement agreement, this matter will be closed. In connection with the settlement, we accrued a $10 million payable in our condensed consolidated financial statements as of March 31, 2020. Please see further information in Part II, Item 1, "Legal Proceedings" contained in this Quarterly Report.

~~Selling and Administrative Expense~~

During the first quarter of 2020, selling and administrative expenses increased 14% as compared to the first quarter 2019. The increase was mainly due to increased legal costs associated with outstanding litigation prior to the settlement agreement that was reached in late March 2020, as discussed above.

~~Net Income~~

~~We generated a net loss of $7.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2020, compared to net income of $6.2 million in the same period in 2019 due to the factors discussed above.~~

~~Potash Segment~~

Three Months Ended March 31,
(in thousands, except per ton amounts) 2020 2019
Sales¹
$ 33,791
$ 34,330
Less: Freight costs 5,441
4,640
Warehousing and handling
costs 1,296
1,267
Cost of goods sold 22,720
19,059
Gross Margin $ 4,334
$ 9,364
Depreciation, depletion, and amortization incurred²
$ 7,312
$ 6,795

Potash sales volumes (in tons) 99
88
Potash production volumes (in tons) 137
110

Average potash net realized sales price per ton³
$ 255
$ 288

¹~~Sales include sales of byproducts which were $4.0 million and $5.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2020, and 2019, respectively.~~

²~~Depreciation, depletion, and amortization incurred excludes depreciation, depletion, and amortization amounts absorbed in or (relieved from) inventory.~~

³~~Average net realized per ton sales price per ton is a non-GAAP financial measure. More information about this measure is below under the heading "Non-GAAP Financial Measure."~~

~~Three Months Ended March 31, 2020, and 2019~~

Potash segment sales in the first quarter of 2020 were similar compared to the same period in 2019, as a 13% increase in sales volume was offset by an 12% decrease in our average net realized sales price per ton and a $1.8 million decrease in byproduct sales. Agricultural sales volumes benefited from good weather in the regions in which we sell, partially offset by a decrease in industrial sales volumes. Average net realized sales price per ton was lower due to price decreases announced in the summer of 2019 and under the winter-fill program announced in January 2020. We also sold fewer tons into the industrial market which generally carries higher pricing. Potash segment byproduct sales decreased due to a $1.0 million decrease in magnesium chloride sales and a $0.9 million decrease in salt sales. Wet weather conditions reduced magnesium chloride production during the 2019 season and limited the amount of product available for sale in the first quarter of 2020. Salt sales decreased compared to 2019 as salt availability improved in certain regions of the country in the first quarter of 2020 which reduced our sales footprint.

Potash segment freight expense increased $0.8 million, or 17%, in the first quarter of 2020, compared to the first quarter of 2019 as a result of increased sales volume and freight rates. Our freight expense is impacted by the geographic distribution of our potash sales and by the proportion of customers arranging for and paying their own freight costs.

Our potash segment cost of goods sold increased 19% in the first quarter of 2020, compared to the same period in 2019, due to a 13% increase in sales volume and higher per ton production costs across our facilities as a result of the below average evaporation in 2019.

~~Potash production increased 25% compared to the first quarter of 2019 as we produced less salt at our Moab facility which allowed for additional days of potash production.~~

Our potash segment gross margin decreased $5.0 million in the first quarter of 2020, compared to the same period in 2019, due to the decrease in average net realized sales price per ton, increased per ton production costs, and a decrease in byproduct sales.

~~Additional Information Relating to Potash~~

~~The table below shows our potash sales mix for the three months ended March 31, 2020, and 2019:~~

Three Months Ended March 31,
2020 2019
Agricultural 81% 71%
Industrial 5% 17%
Feed 14% 12%

~~Trio~~^®~~Segment~~

Three Months Ended March 31,
(in thousands, except per ton amounts) 2020 2019
Sales¹
$ 22,581
$ 17,809
Less: Freight costs 6,548
5,035
         Warehousing and handling
costs 1,608
969
         Cost of goods sold 17,430
11,074
         Lower of cost or net realizable
value inventory adjustments 550
—
Gross (Deficit) Margin $ (3,555 ) $ 731
Depreciation, depletion, and amortization incurred²
$ 1,508
$ 1,558

Sales volumes (in tons) 76
56
Production volumes (in tons) 50
63

Average Trio^®net realized sales price per ton³
$ 193
$ 206

¹~~Sales include sales of byproducts which were $1.4 million and $1.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2020, and 2019, respectively.~~

²~~Depreciation, depletion, and amortization incurred excludes depreciation, depletion, and amortization amounts absorbed in or (relieved from) inventory.~~

³~~Average net realized per ton sales price per ton is a non-GAAP financial measure. More information about this measure, is below under the heading "Non-GAAP Financial Measure."~~

~~Three Months Ended March 31, 2020, and 2019~~

~~Trio~~^® ~~segment sales increased 27% for the three months ended March 31, 2020, as compared to the same period in 2019. The increase was due to a 36% increase in Trio~~^® sales volume offset by a 6% decrease in the average net realized sales price per ton. Increased sales volume was a result of good weather in most of our domestic markets that has advanced the spring application season a few weeks as compared to an average year and an increase in export sales. International Trio^®~~sales volumes increased 48% in the first quarter of 2020 compared to the first quarter of 2019, due to the timing of shipments to international customers. Our Trio~~^®~~average net realized sales price per ton decreased 6% during the first quarter of 2020 as compared to the first quarter of 2019 due primarily to lower domestic pricing.~~

~~Trio~~^®freight costs increased 30% in the first quarter of 2020, compared to the first quarter of 2019, mainly due to an increase in total sales volumes. Our freight expense is impacted by the geographic distribution of our Trio^® ~~sales and by the proportion of customers arranging for and paying their own freight costs.~~

~~Our Trio~~^®~~cost of goods sold increased 57% in the first quarter of 2020, compared to the first quarter of 2019, primarily due to increased sales volume. We also sold a higher percentage of tons as premium Trio~~^® ~~which has a higher per ton carrying cost than our other Trio~~^® products. Also, in the first quarter of 2019, a higher portion of our tons sold had been written down in prior quarters through lower of cost or net realizable value adjustments which resulted in lower per ton costs of product sold.

~~Our Trio~~^® ~~production volume decreased 21% in the first quarter of 2020, compared to the first quarter of 2019, as we used fewer tons of work-in-process inventory to convert to premium Trio~~^®.

~~Our Trio~~^®~~segment generated gross deficit of $3.6 million in the first quarter of 2020, compared to a gross margin of $0.7 million in the first quarter of 2019, due to the factors discussed above.~~

~~Additional Information Relating to Trio~~^®

~~The percentage of Trio~~^® ~~tons sold into the export market increased during the three months ended March 31, 2020, compared to the same period in 2019, due to the timing of shipments to international customers.~~

United States Export
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2020 70% 30%

For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2019 72% 28%

~~Oilfield Solutions Segment~~

Three Months Ended March 31,
(in thousands) 2020 2019
Sales $ 7,741
$ 6,623
Less: Freight costs —
781
Cost of goods sold 2,897
2,769
Gross Margin $ 4,844
$ 3,073
Depreciation, depletion, and amortization incurred $ 632
$ 190

~~Three Months Ended March 31, 2020, and 2019~~

Our oilfield solutions segment sales increased $1.1 million in the first quarter of 2020, compared to the same period in 2019, mainly due to a $2.6 million increase in water sales offset by a $1.8 million decrease in sales of potash in our high-speed mixing service. Our oilfield solutions water sales increased due to strong demand and the acquisition of additional water rights as part of Intrepid South, which allowed us to sell more water. Pressure on oil prices preceding the COVID-19 pandemic led to reduced demand for our high-speed mixing service. We expect the reduced price of oil as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic and related global economic conditions will limit high-speed mixing sales for the foreseeable future. Water that we sell that was used in the production of potash and Trio^® ~~is accounted for as byproduct water sales in the potash or Trio~~^®~~segments.~~

Cost of goods sold increased 5%, or $0.1 million, due to the addition of water and real property assets at Intrepid South in May 2019, partially offset by reduced expenses related to our high-speed mixing service.

In March 2020, we sold approximately 320 acres of fee land from our Intrepid South property for $4.8 million and recognized a gain on the sale of the land of $4.7 million. The gain on the sale of land was recorded in other operating income. The terms of the sale were highly restrictive and only allow the buyer to drill Acid Gas Injection (AGI) wells on the property to dispose of natural gas with high concentrations of hydrogen sulfide (H2S). No water rights were included in the land sale, we retained surface access, and we restricted the use of caliche located on the property to the acreage that was sold in order to prevent sales to third parties or decrease future sales to this customer. Our long-term strategic operating plan for Intrepid South includes selling small parcels of land to other companies, where such sales provide a solution to a company's needs. We anticipate we will continue to have additional strategic sales of small parcels of land in the future.

Specific Factors Affecting Our Results

Sales

Our gross sales are derived from the sales of potash, Trio^®, water, salt, magnesium chloride, brine water and various other products and services offered to oil and gas producers. Total sales are determined by the quantities of product we sell and the sales prices we realize. For potash, Trio^®and salt, we quote prices to customers both on a delivered basis and on the basis of pick-up at our plants and warehouses. Freight costs are incurred on most of our potash, Trio^®and salt sales, but some customers arrange and pay for their own freight directly. When we arrange and pay for freight, our quotes and billings are based on expected freight costs to the points of delivery. When we calculate our potash and Trio^®average net realized sales price per ton, we deduct any freight costs included in sales before dividing by the number of tons sold. We believe the deduction of freight costs provides a more representative measure of our performance in the market due to variations caused by ongoing changes in the proportion of customers paying for their own freight, the geographic distribution of our products, and freight rates. Freight

rates have been increasing, and if we are unable to pass the increased freight costs on to the customer, our average net realized sales price per ton is negatively affected. We manage our sales and marketing operations centrally and we work to achieve the highest average net realized sales price per ton we can by evaluating the product needs of our customers and associated logistics and then determining which of our production facilities can best satisfy these needs.

The volume of product we sell is determined by demand for our products and by our production capabilities. We operate our potash and Trio^® facilities at production levels that approximate expected demand and take into account current inventory levels and expect to continue to do so for the foreseeable future.

Our water sales and other products and services offered through our oilfield solutions segment are driven by demand from oil and gas exploration companies drilling in the Permian Basin. As such, demand for our water is generally stronger during a cyclical expansion of oil and gas drilling. Likewise, a cyclical contraction of oil and gas drilling may decrease demand for our water and the other products and services offered through our oilfield solutions segment. The COVID-19 pandemic has caused an unprecedented decrease in the demand for oil, resulting in ~~record low~~lower prices and significant decreases in oil and gas ~~activity. Because~~activity, and our total water sales, including byproduct water sales, decreased 50% in the third quarter of 2020 compared to the third quarter of 2019 and 20% for the first nine months of 2020, compared to the same period in 2019. We expect our water sales and sales of other products and services offered through our oilfield solutions segment will continue to be negatively impacted through at least the fourth quarter of 2020, due to the continued economic effects of the ~~significant economic uncertainty caused by the~~ COVID-19 ~~pandemic, we cannot reasonably estimate its effect on our financial condition, results~~pandemic.

Table of ~~operations or cash flows in the future.~~Contents

Cost of Goods Sold

Our cost of goods sold reflects the costs to produce our products. Many of our production costs are largely fixed and, consequently, our cost of sales per ton on a facility-by-facility basis tends to move inversely with the number of tons we produce, within the context of normal production levels. Our principal production costs include labor and employee benefits, maintenance materials, contract labor, and materials for operating or maintenance projects, natural gas, electricity, operating supplies, chemicals, depreciation and depletion, royalties, and leasing costs. There are elements of our cost structure associated with contract labor, consumable operating supplies, reagents, and royalties that are variable, which make up a smaller component of our cost base. Our costs often vary from period to period based on the fluctuation of inventory, sales, and production levels at our facilities.

Our production costs per ton are also impacted when our production levels change, due to factors such as changes in the grade of ore delivered to the plant, levels of mine development, plant operating performance, and downtime. We expect that our labor and contract labor costs in Carlsbad, New Mexico, will continue to be influenced most directly by the demand for labor in the local region where we compete for labor with another fertilizer company, companies in the oil and gas industry, and a nuclear waste processing and storage facility.

We pay royalties to federal, state, and private lessors under our mineral leases. These payments typically equal a percentage of sales (less freight) of minerals extracted and sold under the applicable lease. In some cases, federal royalties for potash are paid on a sliding scale that vary with the grade of ore extracted. For the three and nine months ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020, our average royalty rate was ~~4.4%~~5.1% and 4.8%. For the three and nine months ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2019, our average royalty rate was ~~4.5%.~~4.3% and 4.4%, respectively.

Income Taxes

We are subject to federal and state income taxes on our taxable income. Our effective tax rate for the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020 and 2019, was ~~0%.~~zero percent. Our effective tax rate differed from the statutory rate during each period primarily due to the valuation allowance established to offset our deferred tax assets.

Our federal and state income tax returns are subject to examination by federal and state tax authorities.

For the three months ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020 we incurred no income tax expense and for the nine months ended September 30, 2020 we recognized an immaterial amount of income tax ~~benefit and for~~benefit. For the three months ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2019, we incurred no income tax ~~expense.~~expense and for the nine months ended September 30, 2019, we recognized an immaterial amount of income tax benefit.

We evaluate our deferred tax assets and liabilities each reporting period using the enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the periods in which the deferred tax liability or asset is expected to be settled or realized. The estimated statutory income tax rates that are applied to our current and deferred income tax calculations are impacted most significantly by the states in which we conduct business. Changing business conditions for normal business transactions and operations, as well as changes to state tax rate and apportionment laws, potentially alter our apportionment of income among the states for income tax purposes. These changes in apportionment laws result in changes in the calculation of our current and deferred income taxes, including the valuation of our deferred tax assets and liabilities. The effects of any such changes are recorded in the period of the adjustment. These adjustments can increase or decrease the net deferred tax asset on our condensed consolidated balance sheet. However, any resulting impact to the deferred tax benefit or deferred tax expense would be offset by a corresponding adjustment to the valuation allowance and would have no income statement ~~effect~~effect.

As of ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020, we were in a near break-even cumulative three-year income position. Additionally, general uncertainty in the business markets we operate makes it difficult to forecast sustained amounts of future income. These circumstances are significant negative evidence when evaluating the realizability of our deferred tax assets. This negative evidence continues to outweigh the positive evidence of profitability in 2018, and 2019, thereby requiring us to maintain the

full valuation allowance as of ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020. However, we continue to evaluate the need to maintain the valuation allowance against the deferred tax assets and to the extent positive evidence trends continue and our future long-term forecasts show sustained profitability, our conclusion regarding the need to maintain a full valuation allowance could change.

Table of Contents

Capital Investments

During the first ~~three~~nine months of 2020, cash paid for property, plant, equipment, mineral properties, intangible and other assets was ~~$5.7~~$14.1 million. In the second quarter of 2020, we invested $3.5 million for an 11% equity stake in W.D. Von Gonten Laboratories ("WDVGL"). WDVGL is an industry leader in drilling and completion chemistry and a strong supporter of the use of potassium chloride in oil and gas drilling and completion activity.

Given recent economic uncertainty as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly in oil and gas markets near our operations, we ~~reduced~~continue to limit our 2020 capital program and expect tofull year 2020 investment will be ~~near~~at the low end of ~~our previous sustaining capital guidance of $10~~the previously disclosed $15 million to ~~$15~~$20 million ~~for 2020. We also deferred~~range, excluding the ~~majority of our opportunity capital in 2020 and now expect to spend between $5 million and $10 million.~~equity investment discussed above. We anticipate our remaining 2020 operating plans and capital programs will be funded out of operating cash flows and existing cash. We may also use our revolving credit facility, to the extent available, to fund capital investments.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020, we had cash of ~~$44.4~~$9.3 million, compared with cash of $20.6 million at December 31, 2019. In April 2020, we made a $20 million principal payment due on our Series A Senior Notes. In July 2020, we reached an agreement with our noteholders to repay our Series C Senior on July 17, 2020. As part of the agreement, we repaid the full $15 million of principal along with a reduced make-whole payment of $1.9 million. Also, in April 2020, ~~we applied for and~~ received a $10 million loan under the CARES Act Paycheck Protection ~~Program.~~Program (the "PPP"). The loan matures on April 18, 2022 and bears interest at a rate of 1% per annum. ~~Beginning November 2020, we are~~We were required to ~~make~~begin monthly payments of principal and interest in the amount of $0.6 ~~million.~~million in November 2020, but due to extensions of the program and delays in the forgiveness application process, we do not expect to make any payments on the loan until a decision is made on our forgiveness application. We may prepay the loan at any time prior to maturity with no prepayment penalties. We ~~plan to fund~~used the funds exclusively for allowed payroll, benefits orand other ~~allowed~~ expenses ~~under the program~~ and expect the majority of the loan, if not all, will be forgiven. During the second quarter of 2020, the program was amended to allow borrowers to choose either an eight-week or 24-week period to use the funds. We elected to use the 24-week period, which ended in October 2020. The amount eligible for forgiveness is based on the amount of loan proceeds used by us (during the ~~eight-week~~24-week period after the lender makes the first disbursement of loan proceeds) for the payment of certain covered costs, including payroll costs (including benefits), subject to certain limitations and reductions in accordance with the CARES Act. We submitted our application for forgiveness of the full $10 million loan in November 2020. No assurance can be given that we will obtain forgiveness of the loan in whole or in part. In addition, as a borrower that received over $2.0 million, we expect to be subject to an audit to review our eligibility under the PPP. The timing and scope of the audit remains unclear and as a result we are not able to forecast when we can expect a decision on loan forgiveness. We do not expect the audit will impact our eligibility for forgiveness under the PPP. The loan contains customary events of default relating to, among other things, payment defaults, making materially false and misleading representations to the lender or breaching the terms of the loan documents.

~~We accrued~~During the second quarter, we paid $10 million ~~in the first quarter of 2020 relating~~ to aMosaic to settle its lawsuit against us. The settlement ~~of the~~dismisses all current and any future claims by Mosaic ~~lawsuit. We expect~~related to ~~pay the $10 million settlement at the end of May 2020.~~this matter against us. This matter is now closed.

Our operations have primarily been funded from cash on hand, cash generated by operations, borrowing under our revolving credit facility, and proceeds from debt and equity offerings. We continue to monitor our future sources and uses of cash and anticipate that we will adjust our capital allocation strategies when, and if, determined by our Board of Directors. We may, at any time we deem conditions favorable, attempt to improve our liquidity position by accessing debt or equity markets in accordance with our existing debt agreements. We also may raise capital in the future through the issuance of additional equity or debt securities, subject to prevailing market conditions. However, there is no assurance that we will be able to successfully raise additional capital on acceptable terms or at all. With the remaining availability under our credit facility, the proceeds of our loan pursuant of the Paycheck Protection Program under the CARES Act and with expected cash generated from operations, we believe we have sufficient liquidity to meet our obligations for the next twelve months.

The following summarizes our cash flow activity for the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020, and 2019 (in thousands):


	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2020		2019
Cash flows provided by operating activities	$	18,487	$	37,617
Cash flows used in investing activities	$	(12,801)	$	(76,753)
Cash flows (used in) provided by financing activities	$	(17,001)	$	19,091

Table of Contents

Three Months Ended March 31,
2020 2019
Cash flows provided by operating activities $ 14,771
$ 8,121
Cash flows used in investing activities $ (924 ) $ (7,208 )
Cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities $ 9,951
$ (103 )

Operating Activities

Total cash provided by operating activities through ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020, was ~~$14.8~~$18.5 million,~~, an increase~~ a decrease of ~~$6.7~~$19.1 million compared with the first ~~three~~nine months of 2019. The ~~increase~~decrease was mainly driven by ~~an increase~~the litigation settlement paid in ~~accounts payable~~May 2020 and ~~accrued liabilities.~~decreased potash net realized sales price.

Investing Activities

Total cash used in investing activities decreased by ~~$6.3 million~~ ~~in the first three months of 2020, compared with the same period in 2019. In March 2020, we sold 320 acres of fee land on our Intrepid South property to an oil and gas operator~~

for $4.8 million. In the first quarter of 2019, we used $3.3 million as a deposit for the acquisition of Intrepid South. Other additions to property, plant, equipment, and mineral properties increased $1.7 million compared to the first three months in 2019.

~~Financing Activities~~

~~Total cash provided by financing activities increased by $10.1~~$64.0 million in the first ~~three~~nine months of 2020, compared with the same period in 2019 due to the Intrepid South acquisition in 2019. Other additions to property, plant, equipment, and mineral properties decreased $3.4 million in the first nine months of 2020, compared to the first nine months in 2019.

Financing Activities

Total cash used in financing activities increased by $36.1 million in the first nine months of 2020, compared with the same period in 2019 primarily due to $20.0 million paid to retire our Series A Senior Notes at maturity and $16.9 million, including the make-whole payment, paid to retire our Series C Senior Notes in July 2020. Also, during the nine months ended September 30, 2020, we borrowed an additional $10.0 million ofunder our credit facility and received $10.0 million under the CARES Act Paycheck Protection Program. During the nine months ended September 30, 2019, we made net ~~proceeds from~~ borrowings under our credit ~~facility.~~ facility of $19.8 million.

We routinely review the creditworthiness of our customers and make decisions to limit our exposure whenever possible. ~~We increased our bad debt reserve in~~During the first ~~quarter by $0.3 million due to the significant decrease~~nine months of 2019, we saw an increase in ~~oil and gas activity resulting~~delinquencies from ~~the COVID-19 pandemic, which we believe could lead to a decrease in the ability of certain customers to meet their obligations. This increase primarily relates to~~ our smaller customers that purchase water and brine at our truck stations. ~~Our~~These smaller customers mainly serve oil and gas exploration companies and the COVID-19 pandemic has dramatically decreased oil and gas drilling activity. We have not seen an increase in delinquencies from our larger water customers, who take delivery of water via pipeline or directly from our storage ponds or points of diversion, and are generally ~~well-capitalized and we~~well-capitalized. We have also not seen ~~a change~~an increase in the ~~timing of those receivables. The COVID-19 pandemic has not resulted in any change to the timing of receivables~~account receivable delinquencies from our potash and Trio^® customers. While we continue to monitor the creditworthiness of our customers and have made adjustments to reflect the increased uncertainty in specific markets, we don't believe this will have a material effect on our business.

Senior Notes

—As of ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020, we had outstanding ~~$50~~$15 million of ~~senior notes (the "Notes") consisting of the following series:~~

~~$20 million of~~Series B Senior Notes, ~~Series A,~~ due ~~April 16, 2020~~

~~$15 million of Senior Notes, Series B, due~~on April 14, ~~2023~~2023.

~~$15 million of Senior Notes, Series C, due~~ In April ~~16, 2025~~

~~On April 16,~~ 2020, we repaid our Series A Senior Notes ($20 million) at maturity. In July 2020, we repaid our Series C Senior Notes. As part of the repayment, we repaid the full $15 million of principal along with a reduced make-whole payment of $1.9 million.

The agreement governing the Series B Senior Notes contains certain financial covenants, including the following:

During the nine months ended September 30, 2020, our cash position has benefited from $9.9 million in cash payments for future water deliveries under a long-term contract and cash payments at the Intrepid South ranch, which we will recognize as revenue over the life of certain contracts. Under our water contract, a customer is obligated to pay us $3.9 million each quarter regardless of the actual water delivered. Because the customer did not take delivery of the water and is owed future barrels, this cash is not considered in our EBITDA calculation although it has improved our liquidity position.

Table of Contents

For both the ~~three-month period~~nine months ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020, and the ~~three-month period~~nine months ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2019, the interest rates on the Notes were 3.73% for the Series A Notes, 4.63% for the Series B Notes and 4.78% for the Series C Notes. These rates represent the lowest interest rates available under the Notes. The interest rates may adjust upward if we do not continue to meet certain financial covenants.

We have granted to the collateral agent for the ~~noteholders~~Series B Senior Notes a first lien on substantially all of our non-current assets and a second lien on substantially all of our current assets. We are required to offer to prepay the Series B Senior Notes with the proceeds of dispositions of certain specified property and with the proceeds of certain equity issuances, as set forth in the agreement governing the Series B Senior Notes. The obligations under the Notes are unconditionally guaranteed by several of our subsidiaries.

In April 2020, we amended the agreement governing the Series B Senior Notes ~~to add a debt basket~~ to allow for a $10 million loan under the Paycheck Protection Program ~~of the CARES Act. We plan to fund payroll, benefits, or other allowed expenses~~ under the ~~program~~Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and ~~expect the majority of the loan will be forgiven pursuant to current guidelines under the CARES Act.~~Economic Security Act (the "CARES Act"), as described further below.

~~We were in compliance with the applicable covenants under the agreement governing the Notes as of March 31, 2020.~~

Our outstanding long-term debt, net, as of ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020, and December 31, 2019, was as follows (in thousands):


	September 30, 2020		December 31, 2019
Notes and Payroll Protection Loan	$	25,000	$	50,000
Less current portion of long-term debt	(10,000)		(20,000)
Less deferred financing costs	(82)		(247)
Long-term debt, net	$	14,918	$	29,753

March 31, 2020 December 31, 2019
Notes $ 50,000
$ 50,000
Less current portion of long-term debt (20,000 ) (20,000 )
Less deferred financing costs (219 ) (247 )
Long-term debt, net $ 29,781
$ 29,753

Credit Facility—We maintain a revolving credit facility with Bank of Montreal. As of September 30, 2020, borrowings under the credit facility bear interest at LIBOR (London Interbank Offered Rate) plus an applicable margin of 1.25% to 2.00% per annum, based on our leverage ratio as calculated in accordance with the agreement governing the credit facility. We have granted to Bank of Montreal a first lien on substantially all of our current assets and a second lien on substantially all of our non-current assets. The obligations under the credit facility are unconditionally guaranteed by several of our subsidiaries.

We occasionally borrow and repay amounts under the facility for near-term working capital needs or other purposes and may do so in the future. During the nine months ended September 30, 2020, we borrowed $10 million under the facility. As of September 30, 2020, we had $29.8 million of borrowings outstanding and $1.0 million in outstanding letters of credit under the facility. Including the outstanding letters of credit, we had $30.0 million available to be borrowed under the facility as of September 30, 2020. We were in compliance with the applicable covenants under the facility as of September 30, 2020.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2019, we had $30.3 million borrowings under the facility and made $10.5 million in repayments.

Borrowings under the amended credit facility bear interest at LIBOR (London Interbank Offered Rate) plus an applicable margin of 1.25% to 2.00% per annum, based on average availability under the credit facility. We have granted to Bank of Montreal a first lien on substantially all of our current assets and a second lien on substantially all of our non-current assets. The obligations under the credit facility are unconditionally guaranteed by several of our subsidiaries.

In April 2020, we amended the credit facility to ~~add~~allow for a $10 million loan under the CARES Act, described below.

Our EBITDA calculation for the nine months ended September 30, 2020 has decreased from historical levels due to the economic contraction related to the COVID-19 pandemic. If we continue to experience decreased EBITDA amounts in future quarters, we may violate our debt ~~basket~~covenants and may need to ~~allow~~work with our lenders to address the non-compliance. EBITDA in all periods excludes deferred revenue as we have not satisfied the performance obligation to recognize the deferred revenue as revenue, as discussed in Note 11 - Revenue. As of September 30, 2020, we were in compliance with all applicable covenants under the revolving credit facility.

Table of Contents

As of October 30, 2020, we had $29.8 million of borrowings, $1.0 million in outstanding letters of credit under the facility, and approximately $11.1 million in cash. Including the outstanding letters of credit, we had $30.0 million available to be borrowed under the facility.

PPP Loan—In April 2020, we received a $10 million loan under the Paycheck Protection Program (the "PPP") under the CARES Act. The loan matures on April 18, 2022 and bears interest at a rate of 1% per annum. We ~~plan~~were required to ~~fund payroll, benefits, or other allowed expenses under~~begin monthly payments of principal and interest in the amount of $0.6 million in November 2020, but due to extensions of the program and delays in the forgiveness application process, we do not expect to make any payments on the loan until a decision is made on our forgiveness application. We may prepay the loan at any time prior to maturity with no prepayment penalties. We used the funds exclusively for allowed payroll and benefits expenses and expect the majority of the loan, if not all, will be ~~forgiven pursuant~~forgiven. The loan contains customary events of default relating to, ~~current guidelines under~~among other things, payment defaults, making materially false and misleading representations to the lender or breaching the terms of the loan documents.

During the second quarter of 2020, the PPP was amended to allow borrowers to choose either an eight-week or 24-week period to use the funds. We elected to use the 24-week period, ended in early October 2020. The amount eligible for forgiveness is based on the amount of loan proceeds used by us (during the 24-week period after the lender makes the first disbursement of loan proceeds) for the payment of certain covered costs, including payroll costs (including benefits), subject to certain limitations and reductions in accordance with the CARES Act.

We ~~occasionally borrow and repay amounts~~submitted our application for forgiveness of the full $10 million loan in November 2020. No assurance can be given that we will obtain forgiveness of the loan in whole or in part. In addition, as a borrower that received over $2.0 million, we expect to be subject to an audit to review our eligibility under the ~~facility~~PPP. The timing and scope of the audit remains unclear and as a result we are not able to forecast when we can expect a decision on loan forgiveness. We do not expect the audit will impact our eligibility for ~~near-term working capital needs or other purposes and may do so in the future. As of March 31, 2020, we had $29.8 million of borrowings and $1.0 million in outstanding letters of credit~~forgiveness under the facility. Including the outstanding letters of credit, we had $44.2 million available to be borrowed under the facility as of March 31, 2020. As of May 6, 2020, we had $29.8 million of borrowings and $1.0 million in outstanding letters of credit under the facility. Including the outstanding letters of credit, we had $44.2 million available to be borrowed under the facility.

~~We were in compliance with the applicable covenants under the facility as of March 31, 2020.~~PPP.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020, we had no material off-balance sheet arrangements aside from the bonding obligations described in Note 14 to the condensed consolidated financial statements.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019,describes the critical accounting policies that affect our more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements. Except for the accounting policy for the measurement of credit losses for financial instruments that was updated as a result of adopting ASC 326 on January 1, 2020, as discussed in Note 2 to the condensed consolidated financial statements, there have been no significant changes to our critical accounting policies since December 31, 2019.

Table of Contents

Non-GAAP Financial Measure

To supplement our consolidated financial statements, which are prepared and presented in accordance with GAAP, from time to time we use "average net realized sales price per ton," which is a non-GAAP financial measure. This non-GAAP financial measure should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for, or superior to, the financial information prepared and presented in accordance with GAAP. In addition, because the presentation of this non-GAAP financial measure varies among companies, our presentation of this non-GAAP financial measure may not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by other companies.

We believe average net realized sales price per ton, when used in conjunction with GAAP financial measures, provides useful information to investors for analysis of our business and operating results, enhances the overall understanding of past financial performance and future prospects, and allows for greater transparency with respect to the key metric we use in our financial and operational decision making. We use this non-GAAP financial measure as one of our tools in comparing period-over-period performance on a consistent basis and when planning, forecasting, and analyzing future periods. We believe this non-GAAP financial measure is used by professional research analysts and others in the valuation, comparison, and investment recommendations of companies in the potash mining industry. Many investors use the published research reports of these professional research analysts and others in making investment decisions.

Table of Contents

Average Net Realized Sales Price per Ton

We calculate average net realized sales price per ton for each of potash and Trio^®. Average net realized sales price per ton for potash is calculated as potash segment sales less potash segment byproduct sales and potash freight costs and then dividing that difference by the number of tons of potash sold in the period. Likewise, average net realized sales price per ton for Trio^® is calculated as Trio^® segment sales less Trio^® segment byproduct sales and Trio^® freight costs and then dividing that difference by Trio^® tons sold. We consider average net realized sales price per ton to be useful, and believe it to be useful for investors, because it shows our potash and Trio^® average per-ton pricing without the effect of certain transportation and delivery costs. When we arrange transportation and delivery for a customer, we include in revenue and in freight costs the costs associated with transportation and delivery. However, some of our customers arrange for and pay their own transportation and delivery costs, in which case these costs are not included in our revenue and freight costs. We use average net realized sales price per ton as a key performance indicator to analyze potash and Trio^® sales and price trends.

Below is a reconciliation of average net realized sales price per ton to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure for the three and nine months ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020, and 2019:


	Three Months Ended September 30,
	2020				2019
(in thousands, except per ton amounts)	Potash		Trio®		Potash		Trio®
Total Segment Sales	$	22,187	$	12,890	$	29,213	$	14,637
Less: Segment byproduct sales	3,612		1,449		4,971		1,267
Freight costs	2,891		3,878		3,478		3,996
Subtotal	$	15,684	$	7,563	$	20,764	$	9,374

Divided by:
Tons sold	66		40		78		46
Average net realized sales price per ton	$	238	$	189	$	266	$	204

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2020				2019
(in thousands, except per ton amounts)	Potash		Trio®		Potash		Trio®

Total Segment Sales	$	80,504	$	54,722	$	99,090	$	53,881
Less: Segment byproduct sales	10,562		3,248		14,283		3,598
Freight costs	10,021		15,935		10,325		15,503
Subtotal	$	59,921	$	35,539	$	74,482	$	34,780

Divided by:
Tons sold	239		180		261		173
Average net realized sales price per ton	$	251	$	197	$	285	$	201

Three Months Ended March 31,
2020 2019
(in thousands, except per ton amounts) Potash Trio® Potash Trio®
Total Segment Sales $ 33,791
$ 22,581
$ 34,330
$ 17,809
Less: Segment byproduct sales 3,973
1,380
5,785
1,259
          Freight costs 4,540
6,534
3,242
5,035
   Subtotal $ 25,278
$ 14,667
$ 25,303
$ 11,515

Divided by:
Tons sold 99
76
88
56
   Average net realized sales price per ton $ 255
$ 193
$ 288
$ 206

Table of Contents


~~ITEM 3.~~	~~QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK~~

ITEM 3.QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Part II, Item 7A., "Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk," of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019, describes our exposure to market risk. There have been no significant changes to our market risk exposure since December 31, 2019.

ITEM 4.CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain "disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Exchange Act." Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and forms. Our disclosure controls and procedures are also designed to ensure that this information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Under the supervision and with the participation of management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted

an evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020. Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020, at the reasonable assurance level.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the three months ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020, that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. ~~The adoption of ASC 842,~~ ~~Leases,~~ required the implementation of new controls and the modification of certain accounting processes related to leases. The impact of these changes was not material to our internal control over financial reporting.

Inherent Limitations on Effectiveness of Controls

Our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, do not expect that our disclosure controls or our internal control over financial reporting will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within Intrepid have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of a simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the controls. The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

Table of Contents

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION


~~ITEM 1.~~	~~LEGAL PROCEEDINGS~~

In the Fall of 2014, as part of an announced shut-down of the Mosaic Potash Carlsbad Inc. (“Mosaic”) Muriate of Potash facility, Steve Gamble was included in Mosaic’s early retirement/layoff of around 180 employees in its Carlsbad operations. Intrepid subsequently hired Mr. Gamble in January of 2015 after meeting him at a job fair following the Mosaic layoffs.ITEM 1.LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

~~In February 2015, Mosaic filed a complaint~~ For information regarding litigation, other disputes and ~~application for preliminary injunction~~regulatory proceedings see Part I - Item1. Financial Statements, Note 14 - Commitments and permanent injunction against Steve Gamble and Intrepid in the Fifth Judicial District Court for the County of Eddy in the State of New Mexico, to prevent, among other things, his continued employment with Intrepid. In August 2015, the court denied Mosaic’s application for preliminary injunction. Intrepid continued Mr. Gamble's employment after this injunction was denied until approximately October 2015.Contingencies.

In July 2016, Mosaic filed a substantially similar complaint against Mr. Gamble asserting identical claims from its February 2015 New Mexico state court claims, and additional claims, in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Mexico. Mosaic alleged violations of the New Mexico Uniform Trade Secrets Act, tortious interference with contract relating to Mr. Gamble’s separation of employment from Mosaic, violations of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, conversion, and civil conspiracy relating to the alleged misappropriation of Mosaic’s confidential information. Intrepid vigorously denied and contested these claims in two years of costly motions and related proceedings.

Mosaic sought $23 million to $28 million in compensatory damages, $28 million to $37 million in punitive damages, attorneys' fees, other injunctive relief, and future royalty damages in unspecified amounts. Intrepid mounted a vigorous defense incurring growing legal expenses as well as anticipated continued expenses through trial. In addition, Intrepid expected appeals by the non-prevailing party following any verdict which would continue the expense and risk from this matter for potentially a number of years following a verdict. The actual trial date was also in jeopardy given the COVID-19 economic shut-down and related court delays. In March 2020, Intrepid and Mosaic participated in a settlement conference facilitated by a U.S. Magistrate Judge in New Mexico. The parties mutually agreed to settle the matter, subject to signing a final settlement agreement, rather than to continue devoting financial and legal resources to its continuation and expect final closing in May 2020.

Under the terms of the settlement, Intrepid is obligated to pay Mosaic an aggregate of $10 million to dismiss all current and any future claims related to this matter against Intrepid. Upon signing of a final settlement agreement, this matter is closed. In connection with the settlement, Intrepid accrued a $10 million payable in our condensed consolidated financial statements as of March 31, 2020.

Water rights in New Mexico are subject to a stated purpose and place of use, and many of Intrepid’s water rights were originally issued for uses relating to our mining operations. When water rights temporarily exceed the originally permitted use, Intrepid and other persons or entities with New Mexico water rights are able to sell water for alternative uses, such as sand/gravel, road construction, municipalities, farmers, ranchers, and oil and gas development, thereby ensuring the highest and best use of New Mexico water that would otherwise go unused or make its way to Texas. When applicable Intrepid, or any other New Mexico water right holder, applies for a permit from the New Mexico Office of the State Engineer ("OSE") to change the purpose and/or place of use of the underlying water rights. The OSE reviews and makes a determination as to the validity of the right and if it determines the requested change will not negatively impact other valid interests, the OSE may issue a preliminary authorization for the change. The preliminary authorization allows for water sales to begin immediately, subject to repayment if the underlying water rights were ultimately found to be invalid, thereby ensuring the highest and best use of New Mexico water that would otherwise go unused or make its way to Texas. Third parties may protest the preliminary authorization at minimal cost and frequently do so. Once protested, the OSE is required to hold a hearing to determine if the preliminary authorization was appropriate. Since 2017, Intrepid has faced a protest of our rights to use water from the Pecos River from numerous parties. Intrepid has a strong historical and legal basis supporting 19,836 acre feet of water rights on the Pecos River. While some parties have challenged Intrepid’s entire water right, recent and historic analysis from the New Mexico State Engineer’s Water Rights Division indicates Intrepid rights to a minimum of 6,062 acre feet of established rights.

including Intrepid and the protestants, stipulated to the jurisdiction of the adjudication court. To promote settlement, the adjudication court established a settlement schedule and ordered a trial date in August 2020 if the parties have not reached a settlement by that time. The trial date has since been rescheduled to November 2020, subject to the continued motions of the protestants. Preliminary authorizations allow for water sales to begin immediately, subject to repayment if the underlying water rights are ultimately found to be invalid. Separate from the adjudication proceeding, the protestants have challenged these preliminary authorizations before the OSE. Although the OSE is required to hold a hearing relating to the protests, it has temporarily stayed the hearing process in this matter until the agreed-upon adjudication process is complete. In the adjudication proceeding, the court is expected to make a determination as to the size of Intrepid's Pecos River water rights.

In February 2020, the protestant CID/Otis filed a Writ of Mandamus against the OSE concerning these permits, despite its agreed stipulation to jurisdiction of the adjudication court also asking for unspecified monetary and injunctive relief, as well as attorneys' fees and costs, relating to Intrepid’s sale of water under these water rights and breach of contract claims. A hearing regarding this Writ was held in March 2020, and the non-adjudication court granted the Writ against the New Mexico State Engineer challenging the State Engineer's right to grant preliminary authorizations under the New Mexico Water Leasing Act. The non-adjudication court also denied Intrepid’s due process right to participate as a potentially harmed party. The non-adjudication court’s challenged ruling requires the New Mexico State Engineer to withdraw and cancel certain preliminary authorizations the New Mexico State Engineer had issued to Intrepid. This challenged ruling by the non-adjudication court does not impact the validity of Intrepid's water rights, nor does it impact our ability to deliver water at numerous other locations. It potentially limits Intrepid’s ability to use water under two specific leases, subject to challenge, but does not affect Intrepid’s continuing ability to utilize the subject diversion points to service other water rights.

The challenged ruling by the non-adjudication court only affects leases, not the underlying rights, on two points of diversion on the Pecos river and does not affect Intrepid's ability to produce potash or Trio^®. As stated, Intrepid was denied the right to intervene and challenge both the jurisdiction, grounds and legitimacy of the non-adjudication court in this matter and has filed for a Writ of Superintending Control in the New Mexico Supreme Court seeking a reversal of the denial of Intrepid’s request to intervene and seeking to stay enforcement while the matter is being decided. Also as stated, the OSE has filed for a writ of Superintending Control in the New Mexico Supreme Court seeking to assert its jurisdiction over permitting under the Water Leasing Act. Both Petitions seek a stay of the Writ of Mandamus issued by the non-adjudication court. These petitions are currently pending, and the adjudication court has scheduled the underlying issue regarding adjudication of the validity of the subject water rights for November of 2020. We continue to vigorously defend our strong legal position with respect to the validity of our water rights in all forums and assert the proper jurisdiction of the Adjudication Court in determining the validity and extent of Intrepid’s water rights in this matter.

We are subject to other claims and legal actions in the ordinary course of business. While there are uncertainties in predicting the outcome of any claim or legal action, we believe that the ultimate resolution of these other claims or actions is not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.

Table of Contents


~~ITEM 1A.~~	~~RISK FACTORS~~

ITEM 1A.RISK FACTORS

Our future performance is subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties that could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, and the trading price of our common stock. These risks and uncertainties are described in Part I, Item 1A. "Risk Factors" in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019. There have been no material changes to these risks and uncertainties described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019, except as disclosed below:

Pandemics, epidemics or disease outbreaks, such as the novel coronavirus (“COVID-19”), may disrupt our business, including, among other things, demand for our products, our personnel and production processes, each of which could materially affect our operations, liquidity, financial condition and results of operations.

The actual or perceived effects of a disease outbreak, epidemic, pandemic or similar widespread public health concern, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, could negatively affect our operations, liquidity, financial condition and results of operations. ~~While~~During the second and third quarters of 2020, measures designed to ~~date we have experienced no material~~contain the spread of COVID-19 had a negative ~~effects~~impact on ~~our business~~the global economy. Oil demand decreased and, ~~results of operations~~ as a result, we saw a significant decline in oil and gas activity near our Carlsbad, New Mexico operations. We experienced a significant decrease in the sale of ~~the current COVID-19 pandemic, the~~water and other oilfield related products and services, which negatively impacted our overall results. The situation remains dynamic and subject to rapid and possibly material change, including but not limited to changes that may materially affect the demand for our products, our mining operations, and the operations of our

customers and supply chain ~~partners, which ultimately~~partners. These changes could result in material negative effects on our business, ~~and~~ results of ~~operations.~~operations, financial condition, liquidity position and ability to maintain compliance with our debt covenants.

~~In particular,~~While certain COVID-19 containment measures were eased or lifted during the third quarter of 2020, businesses and individuals remained cautious. Even with the easing of COVID-19 containment measures, we have not seen oil and gas activity return to pre-pandemic levels. Outbreaks of COVID-19 cases slowed during the summer, but a resurgence in COVID-19 cases may result in additional containment measures or reinstatement of other containment measures that were in place earlier in 2020. If expanded containment measures are deemed necessary to mitigate the public health effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, ~~has impacted the~~we would likely experience reduced demand for ~~oil as shelter-in-place orders have been issued across most major metropolitan areas, significantly reducing automobile~~water and ~~airline travel, two major consumers of oil. In addition, most cities have required non-essential businesses to close~~other oilfield related products and employees to work from home wherever possible. While shelter-in-place orders could be relaxed in many cities beginning in May, the extent to which these restrictions are relaxed and the subsequent response from businesses and individuals remains uncertain as does the ultimate trajectory of the easing of restrictions over time. It is possible that subsequent shelter-in-place restrictions could be reinstated in major cities at a later date if there is a resurgence of cases related to the COVID-19 pandemic.services.

Our efforts to manage and mitigate the risks may be unsuccessful, and the effectiveness of these efforts depends on factors beyond our control, including the duration and severity of any pandemic, epidemic or disease outbreak, as well as third party actions taken to contain its spread and mitigate public health effects.

~~If we cannot meet the continued listing requirements~~

Table of ~~the NYSE, the NYSE may delist our common stock.~~Contents

On April 17, 2020, we received notice from the NYSE that we were no longer in compliance with Section 802.01C of the NYSE Listed Company Manual that requires listed companies to maintain an average closing share price of at least $1.00 over a period of 30 consecutive trading days (the “Notice”). Pursuant to Section 802.01C, we generally have a period of six months following the receipt of the Notice to regain compliance with the minimum share price requirement, subject to any extensions by NYSE. We can regain compliance with the minimum share price requirement at any time during the cure period if, on the last trading day of any calendar month during the cure period or on the last day of the cure period, we have a closing share price of at least $1.00 per share and an average closing share price of at least $1.00 per share over the 30 trading-day period ending on such date. As required by the NYSE, we have notified the NYSE of our intent to cure the listing standard deficiency and regain compliance with the minimum share price requirement. We intend to consider all available options to cure the deficiency and restore compliance, and we are currently in compliance with all other NYSE continued listing standard rules.

While we are considering various options to cure the deficiency, it may take a significant effort to regain compliance with this continued listing standard, and there can be no assurance that we will be successful. If we fail to regain compliance with Section 802.01C during the cure period, our common stock will be subject to the NYSE’s suspension and delisting procedures. Delisting may adversely impact the perception of our financial condition, the trading of our common stock and our reputation with investors and parties conducting business with us.~~In addition, the perceived decreased value of employee equity incentive awards may reduce their effectiveness in encouraging performance and retention.~~


~~ITEM 2.~~	~~UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS~~

ITEM 2.UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds


Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Period	(a) Total Number of Shares Purchased1	(b) Average Price Paid Per Share		(c) Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs	(d) Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plan or Programs
July 1, 2020, through July 30, 2020	120	8.49		—	N/A
August 1, 2020, through August 31, 2020	29	$	12.46	—	N/A
September 1, 2020, through September 30, 2020	—	$	—	—	N/A
Total	149	$	9.26	—	N/A

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Period
(a)
Total Number of Shares Purchased¹
(b)
Average Price Paid Per Share (c)
Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs (d)
Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plan or Programs
January 1, 2020, through January 31, 2020 —
—
— N/A
February 1, 2020, through February 29, 2020 —
—
— N/A
March 1, 2020, through March 31, 2020 47,361
$ 1.04
— N/A
Total 47,361
$ 1.04
— N/A

¹ Represents shares of common stock withheld by us as payment of withholding taxes due upon the vesting of restricted stock held by our employees.


~~ITEM 3.~~	~~DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES~~

ITEM 3.DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

None.

ITEM 4.MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

We are committed to providing a safe and healthy work environment. The objectives of our safety programs are to eliminate workplace accidents and incidents, preserve employee health, and comply with all safety- and health-based regulations. We seek to achieve these objectives by training employees in safe work practices; establishing, following, and improving safety standards; involving employees in safety processes; openly communicating with employees about safety matters; and recording, reporting, and investigating accidents, incidents, and losses to avoid recurrence. As part of our ongoing safety programs, we collaborate with the Mine Safety and Health Administration (“MSHA”) and the New Mexico Bureau of Mine Safety to identify and implement accident prevention techniques and practices.

Our East, West, and North facilities in New Mexico are subject to regulation by MSHA under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 and the New Mexico Bureau of Mine Safety. MSHA inspects these facilities on a regular basis and issues various citations and orders when it believes a violation has occurred under federal law. Exhibit 95.1 to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q provides the information concerning mine safety violations and other regulatory matters required by SEC rules. Our Utah and HB facilities are subject to regulation by the Occupational Health and Safety Administration and, therefore, are not required to be included in the information provided in Exhibit 95.1.

ITEM 5.OTHER INFORMATION

None.

Table of Contents

ITEM 6.EXHIBITS


~~ITEM 5.~~Exhibit No.			~~OTHER INFORMATION~~			Description

~~None.~~


~~ITEM 6.~~	~~EXHIBITS~~



3 .1						Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation of Intrepid Potash, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit ~~No.~~3.1 of our current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 14, 2020).
						~~Description~~
31.1						Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as amended.*

31.2						Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as amended.*

32.1						Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.**

32.2						Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.**

95.1						Mine Safety Disclosure Exhibit.*

101.INS						XBRL Instance Document.*

101.SCH						XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema.*

101.CAL						XBRL Extension Calculation Linkbase.*

101.LAB						XBRL Extension Label Linkbase.*

101.PRE						XBRL Extension Presentation Linkbase.*

101.DEF						XBRL Extension Definition Linkbase.*


*104			~~Filed herewith.~~			Cover page Interactive Data File (formatted as Inline XBRL and contained in exhibit 101)


**	~~Furnished herewith.~~

* Filed herewith.

** Furnished herewith.

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


		INTREPID POTASH, INC. (Registrant)

Dated: November 3, 2020		~~INTREPID POTASH, INC.~~ ~~(Registrant)~~

~~Dated: May 7, 2020~~	/s/ Robert P. Jornayvaz III
		Robert P. Jornayvaz III - Executive Chairman of the Board, President, and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive ~~Officer and Duly Authorized~~ Officer)




Dated: ~~May 7,~~November 3, 2020		/s/ Matthew D. Preston
		Matthew D. Preston - Vice President - Finance (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

3648



	Three-Month Period Ended March 31, 2019
	Common Stock			Additional Paid-in Capital			Retained Deficit			Total Stockholders' Equity
	Shares	Amount		Additional Paid-in Capital			Retained Deficit			Total Stockholders' Equity
Balance, December 31, 2018	128,716,595	$	129	$	649,202		$	(232,068	)	$	417,263
Net income	—	—		—			6,155			6,155
Stock-based compensation	—	—		1,031			—			1,031
Vesting of restricted common stock, net of common stock used to fund employee income tax withholding due upon vesting	55,249	—		(112		)	—			(112		)
Exercise of stock options	9,187	—		9			—			9
March 31, 2019	128,781,031	$	129	$	650,130		$	(225,913	)	$	424,346



	Three-Month Period Ended March 31, 2020
	Common Stock			Additional Paid-in Capital			Retained Deficit			Total Stockholders' Equity
	Shares	Amount		Additional Paid-in Capital			Retained Deficit			Total Stockholders' Equity
Balance, December 31, 2019	129,553,517	$	130	$	652,963		$	(218,437	)	$	434,656
Net loss	—	—		—			(7,397		)	(7,397		)
Stock-based compensation	—	—		1,032			—			1,032
Vesting of restricted common stock, net of common stock used to fund employee income tax withholding due upon vesting	89,992	—		(49		)	—			(49		)
Exercise of stock options		—					—			—
Balance, March 31, 2020	129,643,509	$	130	$	653,946		$	(225,834	)	$	428,242



	March 31, 2020			December 31, 2019
Notes	$	50,000		$	50,000
Less current portion of long-term debt	(20,000		)	(20,000		)
Less deferred financing costs	(219		)	(247		)
Long-term debt, net	$	29,781		$	29,753



	United States	Export
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2020	70%	30%

For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2019	72%	28%



Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Period	(a) Total Number of Shares Purchased¹	(b) Average Price Paid Per Share		(c) Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs	(d) Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plan or Programs
January 1, 2020, through January 31, 2020	—	—		—	N/A
February 1, 2020, through February 29, 2020	—	—		—	N/A
March 1, 2020, through March 31, 2020	47,361	$	1.04	—	N/A
Total	47,361	$	1.04	—	N/A