Note 1:   Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Account Policies

The unaudited interim financial statements as of and for the sixthree months ended December 31, 2017 September 30, 2018 have been prepared by The L.S. Starrett Company (the “Company”) in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial reporting.  Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and notes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements.  These unaudited financial statements, which, in the opinion of management, reflect all adjustments (including normal recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair presentation, should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K10-K for the year ended June 30, 2017.  2018.  Operating results are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for any future interim period or for the entire fiscal year.

The preparation of financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make judgments, assumptions and estimates that affect amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes.  Note 2 to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K10-K for the year ended June 30, 2017 2018 describes the significant accounting policies and methods used in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements.

Note 2: Segment Information

The segment information and the accounting policies of each segment are the same as those described in the notes to the consolidated financial statements entitled “Financial Information by Segment & Geographic Area” included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2018. Our business is aggregated into two reportable segments based on geography of operations: North American Operations and International Operations. Segment income is measured for internal reporting purposes by excluding corporate expenses, which are included in unallocated in the table below. Other income and expense, including interest income and expense, and income taxes are excluded entirely from the table below. There were no significant changes in the segment operations or in the segment assets from the Annual Report. Financial results for each reportable segment are as follows (in thousands):

Note 2:3:  Recent ARevenue from Contractccounting Pronouncementss with Customers

In May 2014, On July 1, 2018, the FASB issued a new standard related to “RevenueCompany adopted ASC Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers” which amendsCustomers, and all the existingrelated amendments (“ASC Topic 606”), using the modified retrospective method. In addition, the Company elected to apply certain of the permitted practical expedients within the revenue recognition guidance and make certain accounting standardspolicy elections, including those related to significant financing components, sales taxes and shipping and handling activities. Most of the changes resulting from the adoption of ASC Topic 606 on July 1, 2018 were changes in presentation within the Unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheet. Therefore, while the Company made adjustments to certain opening balances on its July 1, 2018 Unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheet, the Company made no adjustment to opening Retained Earnings. The Company expects the impact of the adoption of ASC Topic 606 to be immaterial to its net income on an ongoing basis; however, adoption did increase the level of disclosures concerning net sales. Results for reporting periods beginning July 1, 2018 are presented under the new guidance, while prior period amounts continue to be reported in accordance with previous guidance without revision.

The core principle of ASC Topic 606 is that an entity recognizes revenue recognition. The standard requires entities to recognize revenue when it transfersdepict the transfer of promised goods orand services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled to in exchange for those goods orand services. This standard is applicable for fiscal years beginning after December 15,2017The application of the FASB’s guidance on revenue recognition requires the Company to recognize the amount of revenue and for interim periods within those years. Earlier application will be permitted only as of annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim reporting periods withinconsideration that reporting period. Thethe Company expects to adoptreceive in exchange for goods and services transferred to our customers. To do this, standard onthe Company applies the five-step model prescribed by the FASB, which requires us to: (1) identify the contract with the customer; (2) identify the performance obligations in the contract; (3) determine the transaction price; (4) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract; and (5) recognize revenue when, or as, the Company satisfies a modified retrospective basis for its fiscal year beginning July 1,2018.performance obligation.

The Company primarily sellsaccounts for a contract or purchase order when it has approval and commitment from both parties, the rights of the parties are identified, payment terms are identified, the contract has commercial substance and collectability of consideration is probable. Revenue is recognized when control of the product passes to the customer, which is upon shipment, unless otherwise specified within the customer contract or on the purchase order as delivery, and is recognized at the amount that reflects the consideration the Company expects to receive for the products sold, including various forms of discounts. When revenue is recorded, estimates of returns are made and recorded as a reduction of revenue. Contracts with customers are evaluated to determine if there are separate performance obligations related to timing of product shipment that will be satisfied in different accounting periods. When that is the case, revenue is deferred until each performance obligation is met. No performance obligation related amounts were deferred as of September 30, 2018. Purchase orders are of durations less than one year. As such, the Company applies the practical expedient in ASC paragraph 606-10-50-14 and does not disclose information about remaining performance obligations that have original expected durations of one year or less, for which work has not yet been performed.

Certain taxes assessed by governmental authorities on revenue producing transactions, such as value added taxes, are excluded from revenue and recorded on a net basis.

Performance Obligations

The Company’s primary source of revenue is derived from the manufacture and distribution of metrology tools and equipment and saw blades and related products sold to distributors. The Company recognizes revenue for sales to our customers when transfer of control of the related good or service has occurred. All of the Company’s revenue was recognized under the point in time approach for the three months ended September 30, 2018. Contract terms with certain metrology equipment customers could result in products and services being transferred over time as a result of the customized nature of some of the Company’s products, together with contractual provisions in the customer contracts that provide the Company with an enforceable right to payment for performance completed to date; however, under typical terms, the Company does not have the right to consideration until the time of shipment from its manufacturing facilities or distribution centers, or until the time of delivery to its customers. If certain contracts in the future provide the Company with this enforceable right of payment, the timing of revenue recognition from products transferred to customers over time may be slightly accelerated compared to the Company’s right to consideration at the time of shipment or delivery.

The Company’s typical payment terms vary based on the customer, geographic region, and the type of goods and recognizes revenuesservices in the contract or purchase order. The period of time between invoicing and when payment is due is typically not significant. Amounts billed and due from the Company’s customers are classified as receivables on the Unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheet. As the Company’s standard payment terms are usually less than one year, the Company has elected the practical expedient under ASC paragraph 606-10-32-18 to not assess whether a contract has a significant financing component.

The Company’s customers take delivery of goods, and they are recognized as revenue at pointthe time of saletransfer of control to the customer, which is usually at the time of shipment, unless otherwise specified in the customer contract or delivery,purchase order. This determination is based on applicable shipping terms, as well as the consideration of other indicators, including timing of when the Company has a present right to payment, when physical possession of products is transferred to customers, when the customer has the significant risks and rewards of ownership of the asset, and any provisions in contracts regarding customer acceptance.

While unit prices are generally fixed, the Company provides variable consideration for certain of our customers, typically in the form of promotional incentives at the time of sale. The Company utilizes the most likely amount consistently to estimate the effect of uncertainty on the amount of variable consideration to which will the Company would be entitled. The most likely amount method considers the single most likely amount from a range of possible consideration amounts. The most likely amounts are based upon the contractual terms of the incentives and historical experience with each customer. The Company records estimates for cash discounts, promotional rebates, and other promotional allowances in the period the related revenue is recognized (“Customer Credits”). The provision for Customer Credits is recorded as a reduction from gross sales and reserves for Customer Credits are presented within accrued sales incentives on the Unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheet. Actual Customer Credits have not change under differed materially from estimated amounts for each period presented. Amounts billed to customers for shipping and handling are included in net sales and costs associated with shipping and handling are included in cost of sales. The Company has concluded that its estimates of variable consideration are not constrained according to the definition within the new standard. However,Additionally, the Company applies the practical expedient in ASC paragraph 606-10-25-18B and accounts for shipping and handling activities that occur after the customer has obtained control of a full assessmentgood as a fulfillment activity, rather than a separate performance obligation.

With the adoption of ASC Topic 606, the Company reclassified certain amounts related to variable consideration. Under ASC Topic 606, the Company is required to present a refund liability and a return asset within the Unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheet, whereas in periods prior to adoption, the Company presented the estimated margin impact of expected returns as a contra-asset within accounts receivable. The changes in the refund liability are reported in net sales, and the changes in the return asset are reported in cost of sales in the Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Operations. As a result, the balance sheet presentation was adjusted beginning in Fiscal 2019. As of September 30, 2018, the balance of the new standard’s impactreturn asset is $0.1 million and the balance of the refund liability is $0.3 million, and they are presented within prepaid expenses and other current assets and accrued expenses, respectively, on allthe Unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheet.

The Company, in general, warrants its products against certain defects in material and workmanship when used as designed, for a period of up to 1 year. The Company does not sell extended warranties.

Contract Balances

Contract assets primarily relate to the Company’s rights to consideration for work completed but not billed at the reporting date on contracts with customers. Contract assets are transferred to receivables when the rights become unconditional. Contract liabilities primarily relate to contracts where advance payments or deposits have been received, but performance obligations have not yet been met, and therefore, revenue streams aheadhas not been recognized. The Company had no contract asset balances, but had contract liability balances of its implementation$0.1 million at September 30, 2018.

Disaggregation of Revenue

The Company operates in two reportable segments: North America and International. ASC Topic 606 requires further disaggregation of an entity’s revenue. In the next fiscal year is still in process.following table, the Company's net sales by shipping origin are disaggregated accordingly for the three months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017:

Note 4: Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In February 2016, the FASBFinancial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued ASU Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No.2016-02, 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842)842)”.  The ASU requires that organizations that lease assets recognize assets and liabilities on the balance sheet for the rights and obligations created by those leases.  The ASU will affect the presentation of lease related expenses on the income statement and statement of cash flows and will increase the required disclosures related to leases.  This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted.  The Company is currently evaluating the impact of ASU No.2016-02 2016-02 on its consolidated financial statements.  It is expected that a key change upon adoption will be the balance sheet recognition of leased assets and liabilities and that any changes in income statement recognition will not be material.liabilities.

InOctober 2016, January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No.2016-16, "Income Taxes (Topic 740): Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory", which is intended to improve the accounting for the income tax consequences of intra-entity transfers of assets other than inventory. This update removes the current exception in GAAP prohibiting entities from recognizing current and deferred income tax expenses or benefits related to transfer of assets, other than inventory, within the consolidated entity. The current exception to defer the recognition of any tax impact on the transfer of inventory within the consolidated entity until it is sold to a third party remains unaffected. The amendments in this update are effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of ASU No.2016-16 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

InJanuary 2017, the FASB issued ASU No.2017-01, "Business Combinations (Topic 805) - Clarifying the Definition of a Business", with the objective to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets versus businesses. The amendments in ASU 2017-01 provide a screen to determine when a set of assets and activities is not a business. The screen requires that when substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired (or disposed of) is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or a group of similar identifiable assets, the set is not a business. This screen is expected to reduce the number of transactions that need to be further evaluated. If the screen is not met, the amendments in ASU 2017-01 (i) require that to be considered a business, a set of assets and liabilities acquired must include, at a minimum, an input and a substantive process that together significantly contribute to the ability to create output; and (ii) remove the evaluation of whether a market participant could replace missing elements. The amendments in this ASU are effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2017 and should be applied prospectively. Early adoption is permitted for transactions for which the acquisition date occurs before the issuance date of ASU 2017-01,only when the transaction has not been reported in financial statements that have been issued or made available for issuance. The adoption of ASU No.2017-01 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

InJanuary 2017, the FASB issued ASU No.2017-04, 2017-04, "Intangibles-Goodwill and Other (Topic 350)350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment".Impairment." Under the new guidance, if a reporting unit's carrying value amount exceeds its fair value, an entity will record an impairment charge based on that difference. The impairment charge will be limited to the amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. The standard eliminates the requirement to calculate goodwill impairment using Step 2, which calculates an impairment charge by comparing the implied fair value of goodwill with its carrying amount. The standard does not change the guidance on completing Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test. The amendments in this ASU are effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2019 and should be applied prospectively for annual and any interim goodwill impairment tests. Early adoption is permitted for entities for interim or annual goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the update on our consolidated financial statements.

In February 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-02, “Income Statement – Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income”. For deferred tax items recognized in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (AOCI), changes in tax rates can leave amounts “stranded” in AOCI. Under ASU 2018-02, FASB has given companies an option to reclassify the stranded tax effects resulting from the tax law and tax rate changes under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 from AOCI to retained earnings. This guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018 and requires companies to disclosure whether they are or are not opting to reclassify the income tax effects from the new 2017 tax act. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this update on its consolidated financial statements.

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-13, "Fair Value Measurement ('Topic 820'): Disclosure Framework - Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement." The ASU modifies the disclosure requirements in Topic 820, Fair Value Measurement, by removing certain disclosure requirements related to the fair value hierarchy, modifying existing disclosure requirements related to measurement uncertainty and adding new disclosure requirements, such as disclosing the changes in unrealized gains and losses for the period included in other comprehensive income for recurring Level 3 fair value measurements held at the end of the reporting period and disclosing the range and weighted average of significant unobservable inputs used to develop Level 3 fair value measurements. This ASU is effective for public companies for annual reporting periods and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2019. The Company is currently evaluating the effect, if any, that ASU 2018-13 will have on its consolidated financial statements.

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-14, "Compensation - Retirement Benefits - Defined Benefit Plans - General (Subtopic 715-20): Disclosure Framework - Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Defined Benefit Plans." ASU 2018-14 removes certain disclosures that are not considered cost beneficial, clarifies certain required disclosures and added additional disclosures. This ASU is effective for public companies for annual reporting periods and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2020. The amendments in ASU 2018-14 must be applied on a retrospective basis. The Company is currently assessing the effect, if any, that ASU 2018-14 will have on its consolidated financial statements.

Note 3:5:  Stock-based Compensation

On September 5, 2012, the Board of Directors adopted The L.S. Starrett Company 2012 Long Term Incentive Plan (the “2012“2012 Stock Plan”). The 2012 stock plan was approved by shareholders on October 17, 2012, and the material terms of its performance goals were recently re-approved by shareholders at the Company’s Annual Meeting held on October 18, 2017. The 2012 Stock Plan permits the granting of the following types of awards to officers, other employees and non-employee directors: stock options; restricted stock awards; unrestricted stock awards; stock appreciation rights; stock units including restricted stock units; performance awards; cash-based awards; and awards other than previously described that are convertible or otherwise based on stock. The 2012 Stock Plan provides for the issuance of up to 500,000 shares of common stock.      

Options granted vest in periods ranging from one year to three years and expire ten years after the grant date. Restricted stock units (“RSU”) granted generally vest from one year to three years. Vested restricted stock units will be settled in shares of common stock. As of December 31, 2017, September 30, 2018, there were 20,000 stock options and 153,235199,502 restricted stock units outstanding. In addition, there were 284,600230,033 shares available for grant under the 2012 Stock Plan as of December 31, 2017.

September 30, 2018.

For stock option grants, the fair value of each grant is estimated at the date of grant using the Binomial Options pricing model. The Binomial Options pricing model utilizes assumptions related to stock volatility, the risk-free interest rate, the dividend yield, and employee exercise behavior. Expected volatilities utilized in the model are based on the historic volatility of the Company’sCompany’s stock price. The risk free interest rate is derived from the U.S. Treasury Yield curve in effect at the time of the grant. The expected life is determined using the average of the vesting period and contractual term of the options (Simplified Method).

No stock options were granted during the sixthree months ended December 31, 2017 September 30, 2018 and 2016.2017.

The weighted average contractual term for stock options outstanding as of December 31, 2017 September 30, 2018 was 54.25 years.  The aggregate intrinsic value of stock options outstanding as of December 31, 2017 September 30, 2018 was less than $0.1$0.1 million. Stock options exercisable as of December 31, 2017 September 30, 2018 were 20,000.In recognizing stock compensation expense for the 2012 Stock Incentive Plan, management has estimated that there will be no forfeitures of options.

The Company accounts for stock options and RSU awards by recognizing the expense of the grant date fair value ratably over vesting periods generally ranging from one year to three years. The related expense is included in selling, general and administrative expenses. 

There were 62,00067,000 RSU awards with a fair value of $7.22$6.34 per RSU granted during the sixthree months ended December 31, 2017. September 30, 2018. There were 14,4008,300 RSUs settled, and no RSUs forfeited during the sixthree months ended December 31, 2017.  September 30, 2018.  The aggregate intrinsic value of RSU awards outstanding as of December 31, 2017 September 30, 2018 was $1.3$1.2 million. As of December 31, 2017 September 30, 2018, all vested awards had been issued and settled.

On February 5, 2013, the Board of Directors adopted The L.S. Starrett Company 2013 Employee Stock Ownership Plan (the “2013“2013 ESOP”). The purpose of the plan is to supplement existing Company programs through an employer funded individual account plan dedicated to investment in common stock of the Company, thereby encouraging increased ownership of the Company while providing an additional source of retirement income.  The plan is intended as an employee stock ownership plan within the meaning of Section 4975 (e) (7)(7) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. U.S. employees who have completed a year of service are eligible to participate.

Compensation expense related to all stock based plans for the sixthree month periods ended December 31,September 30, 2018 and 2017 and 2016was $0.2$0.1 million, and $0.2$0.1 million respectively.  As of December 31, 2017, September 30, 2018, there was $1.6$1.9 million of total unrecognized compensation costs related to outstanding stock-based compensation arrangements. Of this cost, $1.4$1.4 million relates to performance based RSU grants that are not expected to be awarded. The remaining $0.2$0.5 million is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.02.3 years.

Note 4:6:   Inventories

In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU No.2015-11, "Inventory (Topic 330): Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory." Previous to the issuance of this ASU, ASC 330 required that an entity measure inventory at the lower of cost or market. ASU 2015-11 specifies that “market” is defined as “net realizable value,” or the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal, and transportation. This ASU is effective for fiscal years, and for interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2016. Application is to be applied prospectively with earlier application permitted as of the beginning of an interim or annual reporting period. The adoption of ASU No.2015-11 did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

Inventories consist of the following (in thousands):

Note 5: Business Acquisition7:   Goodwill and Intangible Assets

In fiscal 2010, the Company entered into an agreement withThe Company’s acquisition of Bytewise in 2011 and a private software company to invest $1.5 million in exchange for a 36% equity interest therein. In the third quarter of fiscal 2017 the Company entered into a new agreement to invest an additional $3.6 million for an additional 64% of equity in the company. The Company paid $1.8 million in cash at closing and is obligated to pay an additional $1.8 million in cash three years subsequent to closing (discounted to $1.6 million on the purchase date). In addition, the agreement provides for the former owners to receive a 30% share of operating profits of the business over the next three years so long as they remain employed by the Company. The Company has accrued for such profit sharing as an expense based on results of operations since the date of acquisition.

The acquisition has been accounted for as a business combination and the financial results of the company have been included in our consolidated financial statements since the date of acquisition. Under the acquisition method of accounting, the purchase price was allocated to net tangible and intangible assets based upon their estimated fair values as of the acquisition date.

The table below presents the allocation of the purchase price to the acquired net assets (in thousands):

Pro-forma financial information has not been presented for this acquisition because it is not considered material to the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

Note 6:   Goodwill and Intangible Assets

The Company’s acquisition of Bytewise in 2011 and the private software company in 2017 resulted in the recognition of goodwill totaling $4.67$4.7 million. Under ASU 2011-08, theThe Company is required, on a set date, to annually assess its goodwill in order to determine whether or not it wasis more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill exceeded its carrying amount. For Bytewise, this date was October 1, 2017. The Company performed a quantitative analysis in accordance with ASU 2011-08 for its annual assessment (commonly referred to as “Step One”).

Determining the fair value of a reporting unit is subjective and requires the use of significant estimates and assumptions.

The Company performed a quantitative analysis of its Bytewise reporting unit for its October 1, 2017 annual assessment of goodwill (commonly referred to as “Step One”). With the assistance of an independent third-partythird-party valuation specialist, the Company estimatesestimated the fair value using an income approach based on the present value of future cash flows. The Company believes this approach yields the most appropriate evidence of fair value. The Company also utilizes the comparable company multiples method and market transaction fair value method to validate the fair value amount obtained using the income approach. The key assumptions utilized in the discounted cash flow model includesincluded estimates of future cash flows from operating activities offset by estimated capital expenditures of the reporting unit, the estimated terminal value for the reporting unit, a discount rate based on a weighted average cost of capital, overall economic conditions, and an assessment of current market capitalization. Any unfavorable material changes to these key assumptions could potentially impact the Company’s fair value determinations.

Under the quantitative analysis, the the 2017 fair value assessment of the Bytewise goodwill exceeded the carrying amount by approximately 81.1%81%. Therefore, no goodwill impairment was determined to exist. If future results significantly vary from current estimates and related projections or business assumptions in the future due to changes in industry or market conditions, the Company may be required to record impairment charges.

The Company has setperformed a qualitative analysis for its February 1, 2018 annual assessment of goodwill (commonly referred to as “Step Zero”) associated with its purchase of a private software company. From a qualitative perspective, in evaluating whether it is more likely than not that the date at February 1^st, 2018, to test the annual impairmentfair value of thea reporting unit goodwill forexceeds its carrying amount, relevant events and circumstances are taken into account, with greater weight assigned to events and circumstances that most affect the software company purchasedfair value or the carrying amounts of its assets. Items that were considered included, but were not limited to, the following: macroeconomic conditions, industry and market conditions, cost factors, overall financial performance and changes in February 2017; however, no eventsmanagement or circumstances have occurred which would indicatekey personnel. After assessing these and other factors the Company determined that it was more likely than not that the unit’s goodwill fair value of this reporting unit exceeded its carrying amount as of February 1, 2018. If future results significantly vary from current estimates and related projections due to changes in industry or market conditions, the Company may be impaired and needsrequired to be tested other than annually.record impairment charges.

Amortizable intangible assets consist of the following (in thousands):

Note 78:  Pension and Post-retirement Benefits

The Company has two defined benefit pension plans, one for U.S. employees and another for U.K. employees.   The U.K. plan was closed to new entrants in fiscal 2009.  The Company has a postretirement medical and life insurance benefit plan for U.S. employees. The Company also has defined contribution plans.

The U.K. defined benefit plan was closed to new entrants in fiscal 2009.

On December 21, 2016, the Company amended the U.S. defined benefit pension plan to freeze benefit accruals effective December 31, 2016. Consequently, the Plan will beis closed to new participants and current participants will no longer earn additional benefits after December 31, 2016.

The amendment of the defined benefit pension plan triggered a pension curtailment which required a re-measurement of the Plan's obligation as of December 31, 2016. The re-measurement resulted in a decrease in the benefit obligation of approximately $6.9 million primarily due to an increase in the discount rate from 3.77% to 4.31%, with an additional $4.2 million decrease resulting from the impact of the curtailment. These reductions in the Plan’s benefit obligation were recorded as other comprehensive income, net of taxes.

Net periodic benefit costs for all of the Company's defined benefit pension plans consist of the following (in thousands):

Note 89:   Debt

Debt is comprised of the following (in thousands):

The Company amended its Loan and Security Agreement, which includes a Line of Credit and a Term Loan (“Credit Facility”), in January 2015.2018.  Borrowings under the Line of Credit may not exceed $23.0$23.0 million.  The Line of Credit has an interest rate of LIBOR plus 1.5%., and expires on April 30, 2021.  The effective interest rate on the Line of Credit under the Loan and Security Agreement for the sixthree months ended December 31,September 30, 2018 and 2017 was 3.8% and 2016 was 3.1% and 2.4%, respectively. Since the expiration date of the loan agreement on December 31, 2017 was within the current fiscal year, the Line of Credit has been classified as short term. As of December 31, 2017, $11.9September 30, 2018, $12.9 million was outstanding on the Line of Credit.

Availability under the Line of Credit is subject to a borrowing base comprised of accounts receivablereceivable and inventory. The Company believes that the borrowing base will consistently produce availability under the Line of Credit in excess of $23.0$23.0 million. A 0.25% commitment fee is charged on the unused portion of the Line of Credit.

The obligations underunder the Credit Facility are unsecured. In the event of certain triggering events, such obligations would become secured by the assets of the Company’s domestic subsidiaries. A triggering event occurs when the Company fails to achieve any of the financial covenants noted below in consecutive quarters.

The material financial covenants of the amended Loan and Security Agreement are: 1)1) funded debt to EBITDA, excluding non-cash and retirement benefit expenses (“maximum leverage”), not to exceed 2.25 to 1.00,2) 2) annual capital expenditures not to exceed $15.0$15.0 million, 3)3) maintain a Debt Service Coverage Rate of a minimum of 1.25 to 1.00, and 4)4) maintain consolidated cash plus liquid investments of not less than $10.0$10.0 million at any time.  As of December 31, 2017, September 30, 2018, the Company was notin compliance with all the fundedfinancial debt to EBITDA ratio, as the Company’s ratio rose to 2.58 to 1.00. This event of noncompliance was the result of the combination of lower than anticipated second quarter operating profits and the addition of the new short-term loans in Brazil.  Additionally, the Company was also not in compliance with one of its non-financial covenants related to these additional borrowings. The Company has received a waiver for both of these non-compliances, and expects to be able to meet these covenants in future periods.

On January 30, 2018, the Company executed an amendment to its Loan and Security Agreement to extend the Line of Credit through April 30, 2021. The agreement was scheduled to expire on April 30, 2018.  The amended agreement maintains the previous line of $23.0 million and the same loan covenants.Agreement.

On November 22, 2011, in conjunction with the Bytewise acquisition, the Company entered into a $15.5$15.5 million term loan (the “Term Loan”) under the then existing Loan and Security Agreement.  The Term Loan is a ten year loan bearing a fixed interest rate of 4.5% and is payable in fixed monthly payments of principal and interest of $160,640.$160,640.  The Term Loan had a balance of $6.9$5.7 million at December 31, 2017.September 30, 2018.

In December 2017, the Company’s Brazilian subsidiary entered into two short-term loans with local banks in order to support the Company’s strategic initiatives. The loans backed by the entity’s US dollar denominated export receivables were made with Santander Bank and Bradesco Bank and totaled $3.5$3.5 million. The Santander loan of $1.5$1.5 million has a term of 180 days and a rate of 4.19% and the Bradesco loan of $2.0$2.0 million has a term of 360 days and a rate of 4.75%. As of September 30, 2018, the outstanding balance on the Bradesco loan was $1.8 million.

Note 910:   Income Taxes

The Company is subject to U.S. federal income tax and various state, local, and foreign income taxes in numerous jurisdictions. The Company’s domestic and foreign tax liabilities are subject to the allocation of revenues and expenses in different jurisdictions and the timing of recognizing revenues and expenses. Additionally, the amount of income taxes paid is subject to the Company’s interpretation of applicable tax laws in the jurisdictions in which it files.

The Company provides for income taxes on an interim basis based on an estimate of the effective tax rate for the year. This estimate is reassessed on a quarterly basis. Discrete tax items are accounted for in the quarterly period in which they occur.

On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act was signed into lawenacted in the United States.  This law made numerous changes to federal taxation in The Act reduces the U.S., including a reduction in the federal corporate tax rate from a graduated rate of 35% to 21% and a one-timeflat rate of 21%, requires companies to pay a one-time transition tax on historicalearnings of certain foreign earningssubsidiaries that had not yet been repatriated.  Thewere previously tax deferred and creates new taxes on certain foreign sourced earnings. Accounting Standard Codification (“ASC”) 740 requires filers to record the effect of tax law changes in the period enacted. However, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118 (“SAB 118”), that permits filers to record provisional amounts during a measurement period ending no later than one year from the date of the Act’s enactment.

As of September 30, 2018, the Company has not yet completed the accounting for the tax rate change iseffects of the enactment of the Act, however, has made a reasonable estimate of the effects on its existing deferred tax balances and one-time transition tax. During the three months ended September 30, 2018, the Company did not recognize any adjustments to the provisional tax expense previously recorded.

The Company has incorporated the other impacts of tax reform that became effective for the Company’s federalCompany in fiscal 2019 including the provisions related to Global Intangible Low Taxed Income (“GILTI”), Foreign Derived Intangible Income (“FDII”), Base Erosion Anti Abuse Tax (“BEAT”), as well as other provisions, which limit tax deductibility of expenses. For fiscal 2019, the GILTI provisions are expected to have the most significant impact to the Company. Under the new law, U.S. taxes are imposed on foreign income in excess of a deemed return on tangible assets of its foreign subsidiaries. In general, this foreign income will effectively be taxed at an additional 10.5% tax rate is reduced by any available current year foreign tax credits. The ability to a blended rate of 28% frombenefit foreign tax credits may be limited under the previous rate of 34% for fiscal 2018, and then will further reduce to the enacted 21% in Fiscal 2019 and beyond.  In addition, there are also a number of other changes primarily related to U.S. taxation of income earned by foreign subsidiaries and on transactions with those subsidiaries.  AsGILTI rules as a result of this legislation, in the quarter ended December 31, 2017, the Company performed an initial assessmentutilization of the impact ofdeferred tax reform and has taken a chargeassets to tax expense of $7,250,000 to reflect thereduce taxable income. The estimated impact of GILTI for fiscal 2019 is an increase to the Company’s effective tax rate reduction on its deferred tax assets. The Company has estimated the overall federal tax impact for the one time transition tax to be zero. Further guidance from the Department of Treasury and various state taxing authorities as well as year-end financial data is required, however, before the various tax calculations can be considered complete.

The Company is reviewing all aspects of the tax law change and, other than the reduced tax rate on earnings going forward, which will provide a favorable benefit, the Company does not believe the other provisions will have a significant impact to tax expense.  The Company will continue to measure the impact of these provisions and will record any changes in subsequent quarters when information and guidance becomes available.approximately 6%.

The tax expense for the secondfirst quarter of fiscal 20182019 was $7,618,000$0.4 million on a profit before tax of $1,097,000 for an$0.9 million (an effective tax rate of 694%38.0%). Before the tax charge related to the new tax legislation, The tax expense was $368,000 or 33.5% of pre-tax income. The effective tax ratefor the secondfirst quarter of fiscal 20172018 was 29.9%. For the first half of fiscal 2018, tax expense was $7,832,000$0.2 million on a profit before tax for the quarter of $1,737,000 for an$0.6 million (an effective tax rate of 451%33.4%). Before the tax charge related to new tax legislation, tax expense was $582,000 or 33.5% of pre-tax income. For the first half of fiscal 2017, the effective The tax rate was 39.1%. In addition to the charge for the change in the tax law, the tax expense in the secondfirst quarter of fiscal 20182019 was reduced by $34,000 of net discrete benefitshigher than the U.S. statutory rate primarily for U.S. tax return provisiondue to return adjustments and a refundable credit for research and developmentthe GILTI provisions, which became effective in fiscal 2019, as well as changes in the U.K. The second quarter discrete tax benefit is in addition to a net first quarter discrete tax benefitjurisdictional mix of $21,000 reflecting a tax benefit for losses in the U.K. which was partially offset by discrete tax expense due to tax deductions related to stock grants which were lower than the book deductions.earnings. The tax rate in the secondfirst quarter of fiscal 2017 is2018 was lower than the U.S. statutory rate asprimarily due to a result of earnings in foreign jurisdictions with lower effective tax rates. This benefit was offset as a result of discrete adjustments primarily for the impact of a tax rate change in the U.K. appliedreduction to deferred tax assets which increased tax expense of $0.1 million related to the benefit of loss carryforwards being recognized due to current year profitability which was partially offset by $298,000a discrete tax expense resulting from book to tax differences in the first quarter.stock grant deductions.

U.S. Federal tax returns throughfor years prior to fiscal 20132015 are generally no longer subject to review by tax authorities; however, tax loss carryforwardslosses carryforward from earlier years before fiscal 2014 are still subject to adjustment. As of December 31, 2017, September 30, 2018, the Company has substantially resolved all open income tax audits and there were no other local or federal income tax audits in progress. In international jurisdictions including Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, Germany, Mexico, New Zealand, Singapore and the UK, which comprise a significant portion of the Company’s operations, the years that may be examined vary by country. The Company’s most significant foreign subsidiary in Brazil is subject to audit for the calendar years 20122013 – 2017. During the next twelve months, it is possible there will be a reduction of $1$0.2 million in long termlong-term tax obligations due to the expiration of the statute of limitations on prior year tax returns.

Accounting for income taxes requires estimates of future benefits and tax liabilities. Due to the temporary differences in the timing of recognition of items included in income for accounting and tax purposes, deferred tax assets or liabilities are recorded to reflect the impact arising from these differences on future tax payments. With respect to recorded tax assets, the Company assesses the likelihood that the asset will be realized by addressing the positive and negative evidence to determine whether realization is more likely than not to occur. If realization is in doubt because of uncertainty regarding future profitability, the Company provides a valuation allowance related to the asset to the extent that it is more likely than not that the deferred tax asset will not be realized. Should any significant changes in the tax law or the estimate of the necessary valuation allowance occur, the Company would record the impact of the change, which could have a material effect on the Company’s financial position.

No valuation allowance has been recorded for the Company’s domesticCompany’s U.S. federal and foreign deferred tax assets related to temporary differences in items included in taxable income. The Company continues to believe that due to forecasted future taxable income and certain tax planning strategies available, it is more likely than not that, it will be able to utilize the tax benefit provided by those differences. In the U.S., a partial valuation allowance has been provided for foreign tax credit carryforwards due to the uncertainty of generating sufficient foreign source income to utilize those credits in the future. Infuture and certain other countries where Company operations are in a loss position, the deferred tax assets for taxstate net operating loss carryforwards and other temporary differences are fully offset by a valuation allowance.that will expire in the near future unutilized.

Note 1011:  Contingencies

The Company is involved in certain legal matters, which arise, in the normal course of business. These matters are not expected to have a material impact on the Company’sCompany’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

In the second quarter of this year, the Company’s Brazilian subsidiary received a favorable ruling on an old tax dispute related to the Brazilian Program of Social Integration (PIS) taxes. This ruling resulted in the recognition of other income of approximately $1.0 million, and was awarded in the form of tax credits to be used to offset future tax payments

Note 1112:  Facility ClosureSegment Information

The segment information and the accounting policies of each segment are the same as those describedCompany decided in the notes to the consolidated financial statements entitled “Financial Information by Segment & Geographic Area” included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2017. Our business is aggregated into two reportable segments based on geography of operations: North American Operations and International Operations. Segment income is measured for internal reporting purposes by excluding corporate expenses which are included in unallocated in the table below. Other income and expense, including interest income and expense, the gain on the sale of a building in fiscal 2017, and income taxes are excluded entirely from the table below. There were no significant changes in the segment operations or in the segment assets from the Annual Report. Financial results for each reportable segment are as follows (in thousands):