Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549


 

FORM 10-Q 

(Mark One)

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2019March 31, 2020

 

Or

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the transition period from ___________ to ___________

 

Commission File No. 000-23143


 

PROGENICS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

Delaware

13-3379479

(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

 

One World Trade Center, 47th Floor
New York, NY 10007
(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)

 

Registrants telephone number, including area code: (646) 975-2500

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 

Title of each class

Trading Symbol(s)

Name of each exchange on which registered

Common stock, par value $0.0013 per share

PGNX

The Nasdaq Global SelectStock Market

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒No☒ No

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ☒No☒ No

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:

 

Large accelerated filer ☐

 

Accelerated filer ☒

Non-accelerated filer ☐

 

Smaller reporting company ☒

  

Emerging growth company ☐

 

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐ 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒

 

As of August 5, 2019,May 4, 2020, a total of 86,421,63486,596,633 shares of common stock, par value $0.0013 per share, were outstanding.

 

1

 

 

PROGENICS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.

 

INDEX

 

 

 

Page No.

Part I

FINANCIAL INFORMATION

 

Item 1.

Financial Statements (unaudited)

 

 

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

3

 

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations

4

 

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss

5

 

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity

6

 

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

7

 

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

8

Item 2.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

2729

Item 3.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

3540

Item 4.

Controls and Procedures

3540

 

 

 

PART II

OTHER INFORMATION

 

Item 1.

Legal Proceedings

3540

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

3640

Item 2.

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

41

Item 3.

Defaults Upon Senior Securities

41

Item 4.

Mine Safety Disclosures

41

Item 5.

Other Information

41

Item 6.

Exhibits

3742

 

Signatures

3843

 

2

 

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION

 

Item 1. Financial Statements

 

PROGENICS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands, except per share data)

 

 

March 31,

  

December 31,

 
 

June 30,

  

December 31,

  

2020

  

2019

 
 

2019

  

2018

  

(unaudited)

  

(audited)

 

ASSETS

 

(unaudited)

  

(audited)

      

Current assets:

                

Cash and cash equivalents

 $84,823  $137,686  $29,531  $42,049 

Accounts receivable, net

  10,569   3,803   6,190   15,976 

Other current assets

  4,806   2,640   4,825   5,707 

Total current assets

  100,198   144,129   40,546   63,732 
                

Property and equipment, net

  7,008   3,944   14,673   11,688 

Intangible assets, net

  7,375   6,666   6,547   6,823 

Goodwill

  17,847   13,074   17,847   17,847 

Operating right-of-use lease assets

  13,889   -   13,279   13,493 

Other assets

  6,464   1,684   5,452   5,887 

Total assets

 $152,781  $169,497  $98,344  $119,470 
                

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

                

Current liabilities:

                

Accounts payable

 $272  $444  $2,860  $1,249 

Accrued expenses

  16,938   10,533   8,383   13,103 

Contingent consideration liability

  -   7,050 

Current portion of debt, net

  5,806   5,419   7,240   7,117 

Operating lease liabilities

  555   -   616   599 

Total current liabilities

  23,571   23,446   19,099   22,068 
                

Long-term debt, net

  36,342   39,180   30,166   31,910 

Operating lease liabilities

  15,312   -   14,832   15,005 

Contingent consideration liability

  4,800   3,950   3,600   3,900 

Deferred tax liability

  28   28   34   34 

Other liabilities

  -   1,818 

Total liabilities

  80,053   68,422   67,731   72,917 
                

Commitments and Contingencies

                

Stockholders’ equity:

                

Preferred stock, $0.001 par value Authorized - 20,000 shares; issued and outstanding - none

  -   -   -   - 

Common stock, $0.0013 par value Authorized - 160,000 shares; issued - 86,599 shares in 2019 and 84,742 shares in 2018

  112   110 

Common stock, $0.0013 par value Authorized - 160,000 shares; issued - 86,796 shares in 2020 and 86,760 shares in 2019

  113   113 

Additional paid-in capital

  724,027   713,019   728,129   727,089 

Treasury stock at cost, 200 shares of common stock

  (2,741)  (2,741)  (2,741)  (2,741)

Subscription receivable

  (933)  - 

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

  (94)  (105)  (327)  (148)

Accumulated deficit

  (647,643)  (609,208)  (694,561)  (677,760)

Total stockholders’ equity

  72,728   101,075   30,613   46,553 

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

 $152,781  $169,497  $98,344  $119,470 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

3

 

PROGENICS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS 

(In thousands, except per share data)

(Unaudited)

 

 

Three Months Ended

  

Six Months Ended

  

Three Months Ended

 
 

June 30,

  

June 30,

  

March 31,

 
 

2019

  

2018

  

2019

  

2018

  

2020

  

2019

 

Revenues:

                      �� 

Product sales

 $270  $-  $270  $-  $1,359  $- 

Royalty income

  3,593   3,530   7,754   6,588   4,789   4,161 

License and other revenue

  6,103   348   6,223   479   100   120 

Total revenue

  9,966   3,878   14,247   7,067   6,248   4,281 
                        

Operating expenses:

                        

Cost of goods sold

  493   -   493   -   1,558   - 

Research and development

  13,080   9,347   25,472   17,457   10,367   12,392 

Selling, general and administrative

  14,570   7,569   23,794   14,266   10,509   9,224 

Change in contingent consideration liability

  916   1,300   1,816   2,100   (300)  900 

Total operating expenses

  29,059   18,216   51,575   33,823   22,134   22,516 
                        

Operating loss

  (19,093)  (14,338)  (37,328)  (26,756)  (15,886)  (18,235)
                        

Other (expense) income:

                        

Interest (expense) income and other income, net

  (607)  (930)  (1,107)  (1,936)  (915)  (500)

Total other (expense) income

  (607)  (930)  (1,107)  (1,936)  (915)  (500)
                        

Loss before income tax benefit

  (19,700)  (15,268)  (38,435)  (28,692)

Net loss

 $(16,801) $(18,735)
                        

Income tax benefit

  -   96   -   96 
                

Net loss

 $(19,700) $(15,172) $(38,435) $(28,596)

Net loss per share - basic and diluted

 $(0.23) $(0.20) $(0.45) $(0.39) $(0.19) $(0.22)

Weighted-average shares - basic and diluted

  85,000   74,017   84,772   73,271   86,582   84,542 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

4

 

PROGENICS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)

 

 

Three Months Ended

  

Six Months Ended

  

Three Months Ended

 
 

June 30,

  

June 30,

  

March 31,

 
 

2019

  

2018

  

2019

  

2018

  

2020

  

2019

 

Net loss

 $(19,700) $(15,172) $(38,435) $(28,596) $(16,801) $(18,735)

Other comprehensive loss:

                        

Foreign currency translation adjustments

  53   (38)  11   (56)  (179)  (42)

Comprehensive loss

 $(19,647) $(15,210) $(38,424) $(28,652) $(16,980) $(18,777)

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

5

 

PROGENICS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY 

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)

 

 

Common Stock

  Common Stock Subscribed  

Additional

      

 

Accumulated 

Other

      

Treasury Stock

  

Total

                  

Accumulated

             
 

Number

      

Number

      

Paid-in

  

Accumulated

  

Comprehensive

  

Subscription

  

Number

      

Stockholders’

  

Common Stock

  

Additional

      

Other

  

Treasury Stock

  

Total

 
 

of Shares

  

Par Value

  

of Shares

  

Par Value

  

Capital

  

Deficit

  

Loss

  

Receivable

  

of Shares

  

Cost

  

Equity

  

Number

      

Paid-in

  

Accumulated

  

Comprehensive

  

Number

      

Stockholders’

 

Balance at December 31, 2018

  84,742  $110   -  $-  $713,019  $(609,208) $(105) $-   (200) $(2,741) $101,075 
 

of Shares

  

Par Value

  

Capital

  

Deficit

  

Loss

  

of Shares

  

Cost

  

Equity

 

Balance at January 1, 2020

  86,760  $113  $727,089  $(677,760) $(148)  (200) $(2,741) $46,553 

Net loss

  -   -   -   -   -   (18,735)  -   -   -   -   (18,735)  -   -   -   (16,801)  -   -   -   (16,801)

Foreign currency translation adjustments

  -   -   -   -   -   -   (42)  -   -   -   (42)  -   -   -   -   (179)  -   -   (179)

Stock-based compensation expense

  -   -   -   -   1,077   -   -   -   -   -   1,077   -   -   878   -   -   -   -   878 

Balance at March 31, 2019

  84,742  $110   -  $-  $714,096  $(627,943) $(147) $-   (200) $(2,741) $83,375 

Net loss

  -   -   -   -   -   (19,700)  -   -   -   -   (19,700)

Foreign currency translation adjustments

  -   -   -   -   -   -   53   -   -   -   53 

Stock-based compensation expense

  -   -   -   -   994   -   -   -   -   -   994 

Issuance of common stock to former shareholders of MIP, net of payments to advisors

  1,632   2   -   -   7,737   -   -   -   -   -   7,739 

Exercise of stock options

  50   -   -   -   267   -   -   -   -   -   267   36   -   162   -   -   -   -   162 

Subscription receivable in connection with exercise of stock options

  -   -   175   -   933   -   -   (933)  -   -   - 

Balance at June 30, 2019

  86,424  $112   175  $-  $724,027  $(647,643) $(94) $(933)  (200) $(2,741) $72,728 

Balance at March 31, 2020

  86,796  $113  $728,129  $(694,561) $(327)  (200) $(2,741) $30,613 

 

  

Common Stock

  Common Stock Subscribed  

Additional

      

 

Accumulated 

Other

      

Treasury Stock

  

Total

 
  

Number

      

Number

      

Paid-in

  

Accumulated

  

Comprehensive

  

Subscription

  

Number

      

Stockholders’

 
  

of Shares

  

Par Value

  

of Shares

  

Par Value

  

Capital

  

Deficit

  

Loss

  

Receivable

  

of Shares

  

Cost

  

Equity

 

Balance at December 31, 2017

  71,325  $93   320  $-  $609,829  $(541,586) $(33) $(2,109)  (200) $(2,741) $63,453 

Net loss

  -   -   -   -   -   (13,424)  -   -   -   -   (13,424)

Foreign currency translation adjustments

  -   -   -   -   -   -   (18)  -   -   -   (18)

Stock-based compensation expense

  -   -   -   -   1,048   -   -   -   -   -   1,048 

Cumulative effect of ASU 2014-09 adoption

  -   -   -   -   -   35   -   -   -   -   35 

Issuance of common stock in connection with at-the-market offering, net of commissions and issuance costs

  1,537   2   (320)  -   7,414   -   -   2,109   -   -   9,525 

Subscription of common stock in connection with at-the-market offering, net of commissions

  -   -   103   -   750   -   -   (750)  -   -   - 

Balance at March 31, 2018

  72,862  $95   103  $-  $619,041  $(554,975) $(51) $(750)  (200) $(2,741) $60,619 

Net loss

  -   -   -   -   -   (15,172)  -   -   -   -   (15,172)

Foreign currency translation adjustments

  -   -   -   -   -   -   (38)  -   -   -   (38)

Stock-based compensation expense

  -   -   -   -   2,130   -   -   -   -   -   2,130 

Cumulative effect of ASU 2014-09 adoption

  -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   - 

Issuance of common stock in connection with at-the-market offering, net of commissions and issuance costs

  2,097   2   -   -   15,288   -   -   -   -   -   15,290 

Subscription of common stock in connection with at-the-market offering, net of commissions

  -   -   (103)  -   (750)  -   -   750   -   -   - 

Balance at June 30, 2018

  74,959  $97   -  $-  $635,709  $(570,147) $(89) $-   (200) $(2,741) $62,829 
                  

Accumulated

             
  

Common Stock

  

Additional

      

Other

  

Treasury Stock

  

Total

 
  

Number

      

Paid-in

  

Accumulated

  

Comprehensive

  

Number

      

Stockholders’

 
  

of Shares

  

Par Value

  

Capital

  

Deficit

  

Loss

  

of Shares

  

Cost

  

Equity

 

Balance at January 1, 2019

  84,742  $110  $713,019  $(609,208) $(105)  (200) $(2,741) $101,075 

Net loss

  -   -   -   (18,735)  -   -   -   (18,735)

Foreign currency translation adjustments

  -   -   -   -   (42)  -   -   (42)

Stock-based compensation expense

  -   -   1,077   -   -   -   -   1,077 

Balance at March 31, 2019

  84,742  $110  $714,096  $(627,943) $(147)  (200) $(2,741) $83,375 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

6

 

PROGENICS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS 

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)

 

  

Six Months Ended

 
  

June 30,

 
  

2019

  

2018

 

Cash flows from operating activities:

        

Net loss

 $(38,435) $(28,596)

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:

        

Stock-based compensation expense

  2,071   3,178 

Depreciation and amortization

  1,166   590 

Non-cash interest expense

  139   137 

Other

  11   (96)

Change in fair value of contingent consideration liability

  1,816   2,100 

Changes in assets and liabilities:

        

Accounts receivable

  (6,764)  164 

Other current assets

  (2,073)  63 

Other assets

  (2,705)  - 

Accounts payable

  (169)  (2,797)

Accrued expenses

  6,446   (77)

Other current liabilities

  39   - 

Other liabilities

  (242)  145 

Net cash used in operating activities

  (38,700)  (25,189)

Cash flows from investing activities:

        

Acquisition of AZEDRA manufacturing assets

  (8,000)  - 

Purchases of property and equipment

  (1,827)  (502)

Portion of MIP milestones paid to former advisor

  (277)  - 

Net cash used in investing activities

  (10,104)  (502)

Cash flows from financing activities:

        

Net proceeds from issuance of common stock in connection with at-the-market offering

  -   24,815 

Repayment of debt

  (2,590)  (2,179)

Proceeds from exercise of stock options

  267   - 

Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities

  (2,323)  22,636 

Effect of currency rate changes on cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash

  2   (93)

Net decrease in cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash

  (51,125)  (3,148)

Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash at beginning of period

  139,220   92,164 

Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash at end of period

 $88,095  $89,016 
         

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information

        

Cash paid for interest

 $2,131  $2,381 
         

Non-cash financing activity

        

Subscription receivable

 $933  $- 

The following table provides a reconciliation of cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash reported within the condensed consolidated balance sheets to the total of the same such amounts shown above for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018:

 

Three Months Ended

 
 

March 31,

 
 

2020

  

2019

 

Cash flows from operating activities:

        

Net loss

 $(16,801) $(18,735)

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:

        

Stock-based compensation expense

  878   1,077 

Depreciation and amortization

  742   557 

Non-cash interest expense

  61   71 

Other

  -   11 

Change in fair value of contingent consideration liability

  (300)  900 

Changes in assets and liabilities:

        

Accounts receivable

  9,786   (1,136)

Other current assets

  968   (447)

Other assets

  286   146 

Accounts payable

  1,618   124 

Accrued expenses

  (4,888)  (991)

Other current liabilities

  217   18 

Other liabilities

  (174)  (114)

Net cash used in operating activities

  (7,607)  (18,519)

Cash flows from investing activities:

        

Acquisition of AZEDRA manufacturing assets

  -   (8,000)

Purchases of property and equipment

  (3,553)  (491)

Net cash used in investing activities

  (3,553)  (8,491)

Cash flows from financing activities:

        

Repayment of debt

  (1,682)  (1,037)

Proceeds from exercise of stock options

  162   - 

Net cash used in financing activities

  (1,520)  (1,037)

Effect of currency rate changes on cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash

  (201)  (46)

Net decrease in cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash

  (12,881)  (28,093)

Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash at beginning of period

  45,065   139,220 

Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash at end of period

 $32,184  $111,127 
        

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information

        

Cash paid for interest

 $939  $1,077 
        

The following table provides a reconciliation of cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash reported within the condensed consolidated balance sheets to the total of the same such amounts shown above for the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019:

The following table provides a reconciliation of cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash reported within the condensed consolidated balance sheets to the total of the same such amounts shown above for the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019:

 
        

Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash information

                

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

  137,686   90,642   42,049   137,686 

Restricted cash included in long-term assets at the beginning of period

  1,534   1,522   3,016   1,534 

Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of period

 $139,220  $92,164  $45,065  $139,220 
                

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

  84,823   87,490   29,531   109,587 

Restricted cash included in long-term assets at the end of period

  3,272   1,526   2,653   1,540 

Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash at end of period

 $88,095  $89,016  $32,184  $111,127 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

7

 

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

 

 

Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

 

Business

 

Progenics Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (and its subsidiaries collectively the “Company,” “Progenics”, “we”, or “us”) is an oncology company focused on the development and commercialization of innovative targeted medicines and artificial intelligence to find, fight and follow cancer. HighlightsOur recent progress includes the enrollment completion of our recent progress include the first commercial revenue for AZEDRA®, completion of enrollment of the PyLTMpivotal Phasephase 3 trial for PyL™ and dosing of the first patient in the 1095 open label Phase 2 trial.positive topline results. Our pipeline includes therapeutic agents designed to precisely target cancer (AZEDRA®, 1095 and PSMA TTC), as well as prostate-specific membrane antigen (“PSMA”) targeted imaging agents for prostate cancer (PyL and 1404).

 

Recent and Continued Progress:

AZEDRA Launch – A team of Nuclear Medicine Technologists, Sales Representatives, Medical Science Liaisons and Access Specialists are in the field assisting centers of excellence and payers with utilizing and reimbursing AZEDRA. This quarter we completed the first administrations of commercial AZEDRA and recorded our first commercial sales.

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services ("CMS") approved a new technology add-on payment ("NTAP") for AZEDRA when administered in the hospital inpatient setting for Medicare beneficiaries in FY 2020. The NTAP will cover the lesser of 65 percent of the average cost of AZEDRA, or 65 percent of the costs in excess of the Medicare Severity Diagnosis Related Groups ("MS–DRG") payment for the case. As a result, the maximum NTAP for a case involving a therapeutic dose of AZEDRA is $98,150.

Patient enrollment for the Phase 3 CONDOR trial evaluating the diagnostic performance and clinical impact of PyL (18F-DCFPyL) was completed five months ahead of schedule. The Phase 3 CONDOR trial is a multi-center, open label trial that dosed 208 patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer at 14 sites in the U.S. and Canada. Top-line data is expected by year end.

The first patient was dosed in the ongoing Phase 2 trial of 1095 in combination with enzalutamide in chemotherapy-naïve patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Progenics’1095 is a small molecule radiotherapeutic designed to selectively bind to the extracellular domain of prostate specific membrane antigen (“PSMA”), a protein that is highly expressed on prostate cancer cells.

We reached alignment with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) on a clinical development plan to support an expanded label for AZEDRA for the treatment of patients with unresectable or metastatic neuroendocrine tumors (“NETs”) who are MIBG-avid. Progenics plans to conduct a basket study that will evaluate AZEDRA in patients with NETs that are MIBG-avid, including gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors as well as other NETs and utilize a dosing regimen that enables outpatient administration. The basket study is expected to begin by the end of the year and enroll approximately 150 patients at sites in the U.S. and Canada.

The U.S. District Court of New Jersey upheld the validity and determined the infringement by Actavis Laboratories FL, Inc. (“Actavis”) of a patent protecting RELISTOR Tablets, which expires in March 2031. Defendant, Actavis, a subsidiary of Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., had challenged the validity of and had alleged non-infringement of Claims 2 and 5 of U.S. Patent No. 8,524,276, which protects the formulation of RELISTOR Tablets.

We entered into an exclusive license agreement with ROTOP Pharmaka GmbH (“ROTOP”), a Germany-based developer of radiopharmaceuticals for nuclear medicine diagnostics, to develop and commercialize 1404 in Europe. 1404 is a technetium-99m labeled small molecule which binds to PSMA and is used as an imaging agent to diagnose and detect localized prostate cancer as well as soft tissue and bone metastases. Under the terms of the collaboration, ROTOP will be responsible for the development, regulatory approvals and commercialization of 1404 in Europe while Progenics is entitled to double-digit, tiered royalties on net sales in the territory.

The automated Bone Scan Index (“aBSI”) automatically segments the anatomical regions of the skeleton and detects and classifies lesions in the bone scans of prostate cancer patients. The aBSI has been shown to be an objective measure of the quantitative change in disease burden and is a prognostic biomarker in patients with metastatic prostate cancer. In August 2019, the Company received 510(k) clearance from the FDA to market its cloud-based version of aBSI product in the U.S. This clearance of our cloud-based software as a medical device is an essential step towards the further development of PSMA AI.

We entered into a transfer agreement with FUJIFILM Toyama Chemical Co, Ltd. (“FUJIFILM”) for the rights to the Company’s aBSI product in Japan for use under the name BONENAVI®. Under the terms of the agreement, FUJIFILM acquired, by a combination of purchase and license, the Japanese software, source code, supporting data and all Japanese patents associated with the aBSI product from Progenics for use in Japan. In exchange, Progenics received $4.0 million in an upfront payment and will receive service fees for aBSI and other AI products over three years in Japan. BONENAVI has been licensed to FUJIFILM for use in Japan since 2011.

We initiated a collaboration that provides the VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System (“VAGLAHS”) with access to the Company’s AI platform for investigational use. In the project, the VAGLAHS network will gain access to Progenics’ machine learning platforms, which includes the aBSI and the PSMA AI platforms. The collaboration will explore novel predictive machine learning algorithms from the digital medical images and its associated clinical outcomes. These novel algorithms will be prospectively validated at VAGLAHS for effective healthcare management of veterans with prostate cancer. This project is the nation’s first collaborative effort to validate cutting-edge machine learning tools for improving treatment management of veterans with prostate cancer and provides additional validation to Progenics’ AI platform.

8

Corporate:

Progenics appointed Huw Jones to the newly created role of Vice President, Commercial. Mr. Jones joins Progenics following several years on the commercial strategy and operations team at Novartis Pharmaceuticals, as well as its subsidiaries, Advanced Accelerator Applications SA and Novartis Oncology. In his two decades at Novartis and its subsidiaries, Mr. Jones held various global leadership roles, including Executive Director and Global Brand Leader, Head of Global Commercial Excellence, as well as positions of increasing responsibility in general management, sales, marketing, training and commercial operations.

Strategic partnerships:

RELISTOR® (methylnaltrexone bromide) is licensed to Salix Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Bausch Health Companies Inc. (“Bausch”, which is the predecessor of Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, Inc.). RELISTOR subcutaneous injection and RELISTOR Tablets are approved by the FDA for the treatment of opioid-induced constipation in adults with chronic non-cancer pain.

Bayer AG (“Bayer”) has exclusive worldwide rights to develop and commercialize products using our PSMA antibody technology, in combination with Bayer’s alpha-emitting radionuclides. Bayer is developing PSMA TTC, a thorium-227 labeled PSMA-targeted antibody therapeutic. Bayer initiated a Phase 1 trial of PSMA TTC in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. In May 2019, Bayer dosed the first patient in the Phase 1 trial which triggered a $2.0 million milestone payment, recorded as part of the license and other revenue.

CytoDyn Inc. (“CytoDyn”) acquired leronlimab (PRO 140), which acquisition included a milestone and royalty payment obligations to us. Leronlimab is a fully humanized monoclonal antibody which is a cellular targeting CCR5 entry antagonist and is currently in development for the treatment of HIV. CytoDyn announced in March 2019 that it filed its first of three sections of its Biologics License Application (“BLA”) to the FDA for leronlimab for the treatment of HIV under the Rolling Review process.

Curium has exclusive rights to develop, manufacture and commercialize PyL (18F-DCFPyL) in Europe. Under the terms of the collaboration, Curium is responsible for the development, regulatory approvals and commercialization of PyL in Europe, and Progenics is entitled to royalties on net sales of PyL.

ROTOP has exclusive rights to develop, manufacture and commercialize 1404 in Europe. Under the terms of the collaboration, ROTOP is responsible for the development, regulatory approvals and commercialization of 1404 in Europe. We understand from ROTOP that it plans to hold an expert panel meeting with Key Opinion Leaders (“KOLs”) in the PSMA imaging field, as well as regulatory experts, to review existing data on 1404 and obtain guidance on the clinical development. Upon agreement on a path forward, ROTOP will request a meeting with European regulators and start a clinical trial in early 2020. Under this agreement, Progenics is entitled to double-digit, tiered royalties on future net sales of 1404 in Europe.

FUJIFILM has rights to the Company’s aBSI product in Japan for use under the name BONENAVI. Under the terms of the agreement, FUJIFILM acquired, by a combination of purchase and license, the Japanese software, source code, supporting data and all Japanese patents associated with the aBSI product from us for use in Japan. In exchange, Progenics received a $4.0 million upfront payment and is entitled to service fees for the next three years.

Our current principal sources of revenue from operations are royaltyAZEDRA sales, royalties, and development and commercial milestones from Bausch and Bayer.strategic partnerships. Royalty and further milestone payments from Bausch or Bayer depend on success in development and commercialization of RELISTOR and our PSMA antibody technology,PSMA-TTC, respectively, which is dependent on many factors, such as Bausch or Bayer’s respective efforts, decisions by the FDA and other regulatory bodies, competition from drugs for the same or similar indications, and the outcome of clinical and other testing of the licensed products.

 

We commenced principal operations in 1988, became publicly traded in 1997, and throughout have been engaged primarily in research and development efforts, establishing corporate collaborations, launching and commercializing AZEDRA and other related business activities. Certain of our intellectual property rights are held by wholly-owned subsidiaries. Our U.S. operations are presently conducted at our headquarters in New York and our manufacturing facility in Somerset, New Jersey. The operations of our wholly-owned foreign subsidiary, EXINI Diagnostics A.B. (“EXINI”), are conducted at our facility in Lund, Sweden. We operate under a single operating segment, which includes development, manufacturing and commercialization of pharmaceutical products and other technologies to target, diagnose and treat cancer. Our operating segment is regularly evaluated for financial performance by our chief operating decision maker, who is our Interim Chief Executive Officer.

 

Pending Merger with Lantheus Holdings, Inc.

On February 20, 2020, we announced the signing of an amended and restated agreement and plan of merger with Lantheus Holdings, Inc. (“Lantheus Holdings”) (the “Merger Agreement”). The Merger Agreement reflects the renegotiation of certain of the terms of our original agreement for the proposed merger entered into on October 1, 2019. The combined company would be led by Lantheus Holdings’ Chief Executive Officer, Mary Anne Heino. Ms. Heino will be supported by Chief Financial Officer, Robert J. Marshall Jr., and Chief Operations Officer, John Bolla. The Merger Agreement provides that, following the closing, Dr. Gérard Ber and Mr. Heinz Mäusli, currently members of Progenics’ Board of Directors (the “Board”), will be added as members of the Board of Directors of Lantheus Holdings. At the effective time of the merger, each share of Progenics common stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to such time (other than excluded shares and dissenting shares) will be converted into the right to receive (i) 0.31 of a share of Lantheus Holdings common stock (an increase from 0.2502 under the original agreement) and (ii) one non-transferrable contingent value right (a "CVR") per share of Progenics common stock, which will represent the right to receive up to two contingent payments upon the achievement of certain milestones subject to the terms of the Contingent Value Rights Agreement to be entered into between Lantheus Holdings and a rights agent reasonable acceptable to Progenics at or immediately prior to the effective time of the merger. In no event will Lantheus Holdings’ aggregate payments in respect of the CVRs, together with any other non-stock consideration treated as paid in connection with the proposed merger, exceed 19.9% of the total consideration Lantheus Holdings pays in the proposed merger. As a result of the increase in the exchange ratio, following the completion of the proposed merger, former Progenics stockholders’ aggregate ownership stake will increase to approximately 40% of the combined company from approximately 35% under the terms set forth in the original agreement.

On April 2, 2020, Progenics and Lantheus Holdings announced their decision to reschedule their respective special meetings of stockholders to vote on the matters related to the proposed merger of Progenics and Lantheus Holdings from April 28, 2020 to June 16, 2020. The rescheduling of the special meetings is intended to allow both companies the time necessary to respond to the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) global pandemic and its effect on each company’s business and on the combined company. The transaction is expected to close in the second quarter of 2020, subject to approval by Lantheus Holdings and Progenics stockholders and certain other customary closing conditions.

On April 14, 2020, Progenics entered into an agreement with Velan Capital, L.P. (“Velan”), Altiva Management Inc., Balaji Venkataraman and Deepak Sarpangal (collectively, the “Velan Stockholders”), pursuant to which Progenics agreed to pay the Velan Stockholders $1.3 million as partial reimbursement for their expenses incurred in connection with the Velan Stockholders’ involvement with Progenics, including the successful consent solicitation commenced on September 18, 2019 to reconstitute the board of directors of Progenics. The reimbursement will be in full satisfaction of the Velan Stockholders’ claims with respect to such expenses and will be paid promptly following the adoption of the Merger Agreement by the stockholders of Progenics and the approval of the stock issuance pursuant to the Merger Agreement by the stockholders of Lantheus Holdings.

9
8

In addition, on April 14, 2020, Progenics and Lantheus Holdings announced the entry by Lantheus Holdings into a Support Agreement (the “Support Agreement”) with Velan in connection with the proposed merger of Progenics and Lantheus Holdings, providing that Velan will vote all of its Progenics common stock and Lantheus Holdings common stock in favor of the proposed merger of Lantheus Holdings and Progenics on the terms set forth in the Merger Agreement, and that Velan will abide by certain customary standstill provisions, in each case, subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the Support Agreement.

AZEDRA

AZEDRA is the first and only approved therapy in the U.S. for the treatment of adult and pediatric patients 12 years and older with iobenguane scan positive, unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic pheochromocytoma or paraganglioma who require systemic anticancer therapy.

First quarter sales of AZEDRA totaled approximately $1.4 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2020. Sales of therapeutic doses of AZEDRA doubled over the preceding quarter. Progenics is continuing to receive and process requests for both dosimetry and therapeutic doses. However, in alignment with government, regulatory and public health recommendations in relation to the COVID-19 pandemic, many of the multidisciplinary treatment centers that serve pheochromocytoma or paraganglioma patients have banned, or have limited access to external visitors, including the field-based sales team for AZEDRA, to ensure the safety of patients and healthcare providers. Consequently, the Company expects corresponding product revenue to reflect the challenging environment associated with the COVID-19 pandemic until restrictions are lifted. As a result, the Company has decided to curtail promotional spending and furlough a portion of the field-based AZEDRA commercial operations and medical employees to support cost-saving measures as the Company continues to navigate through the changing COVID-19 environment. Progenics continues to assess this emerging situation and will make any relevant adjustments in alignment with government mandates when necessary.

PyL

We recently completed two successful pre-New Drug Application (“NDA”) meetings with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (‘FDA’) and remain on track to complete a submission early in the third quarter of 2020. Based on prior discussions with the FDA, we believe that the data from the CONDOR study and the OSPREY study can serve as a basis for an NDA for PyL.

Several abstracts pertaining to PyL were recently published in the Journal of Urology, including the results of the Phase 3 CONDOR study in patients with biochemical recurrent prostate cancer. The CONDOR trial achieved its primary endpoint, with a correct localization rate (CLR) of 84.8% to 87.0% among the three blinded independent readers (the lower bound of the 95% confidence intervals ranging from 77.8% to 80.4%). The results of additional investigator-sponsored studies of PyL conducted in post-prostatectomy patients and metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma were also published in the journal.

1095

Following the removal of the import alert on Centre for Probe Development & Commercialization (CPDC), we have initiated eleven clinical sites in the U.S along with the six active sites in Canada to support enrollment in the Company’s multicenter, randomized, controlled, ARROW Phase 2 study in mCRPC. Progenics’1095 is a small molecule radiotherapeutic designed to selectively bind to the extracellular domain of PSMA, a protein that is highly expressed on prostate cancer cells. As the clinical community is facing challenges in trial conduct due to the COVID-19 pandemic, we are committed to ensuring adequate safety monitoring of ARROW subjects and maintaining the integrity of the trial in alignment with government, regulatory and public health recommendations. As such, Progenics has paused new enrollment for several months in the Phase 2 trial of I-131-1095 (1095) in combination with enzalutamide in chemotherapy-naïve patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) to minimize the risk to patients and healthcare providers during the pandemic. For patients who are active and have been randomized for the study, they will continue to receive treatment doses and will be monitored for safety and efficacy in a manner that is permissible by each clinical site. As a result, the Company has decided to furlough a portion of the clinical employees to support cost-saving measures as the Company continues to navigate through the changing COVID-19 environment. Progenics continues to assess this emerging situation and will make any relevant adjustments in alignment with government mandates when necessary.

9

 

Liquidity

The Company is not profitable and there is no assurance that we will ever achieve and sustain profitability on a continuing basis. In addition, development activities, clinical testing, and commercialization of the Company’s product candidates will require additional financing. The Company’s accumulated deficit at March 31, 2020 totaled $694.6 million, and management expects to incur substantial losses in future periods. The success of the Company is subject to certain risks and uncertainties, including among others, uncertainties associated with the proposed merger with Lantheus Holdings; uncertainty of the impact of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic; uncertainty of product development and commercialization; uncertainty of capital availability; uncertainty in the Company’s ability to enter into agreements with collaborative partners; dependence on third parties; and dependence on key personnel.

 

At June 30, 2019,March 31, 2020, we had $84.8$29.5 million of cash and cash equivalents, a decrease of $52.9$12.5 million from $137.7$42.0 million at December 31, 2018. We expect2019. On February 20, 2020, we announced the signing of the Merger Agreement. Additionally, on March 15, 2020, Progenics as borrower, and Lantheus Medical Imaging, Inc. (“Lantheus Medical Imaging”), a subsidiary of Lantheus Holdings, as lender, entered into a bridge loan agreement, pursuant to which Lantheus Medical Imaging agreed to provide for a secured short-term loan to the Company on or after May 1, 2020 in an aggregate principal amount of up to $10 million (the “Bridge Loan Agreement”). The bridge loan matures on the earlier to occur of (a) September 30, 2020 and (b) the date on which the Company enters into a debt financing or similar arrangements or any amendment to, or replacement of, its existing debt, provided by one or more third parties following the termination date of the Merger Agreement, in either case, having aggregate net cash proceeds that thisexceed the amount then required to repay all obligations under the Bridge Loan Agreement in full in cash. The bridge loan bears interest at a rate per annum of 9.5% and is secured through the pledge to Lantheus Medical Imaging of all of the issued and outstanding shares of capital stock of Molecular Insight Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a subsidiary of Progenics (“MIP”), and any debt of MIP owed to Progenics. Progenics will use the proceeds of the bridge loan for working capital and other general corporate purposes.

Consistent with regular practice for a growth-stage pharmaceutical or biotechnology company, and as we have done in the past, we anticipate the need, and are exploring options for, additional financing in order to meet our cash requirements if the proposed merger with Lantheus Holdings is not ultimately consummated. However, there can be no assurances that we will be sufficientable to obtain additional capital on acceptable terms and in the amounts necessary to fully fund operations as currently anticipatedour current operating expenses or reduced operating expenses reflecting delays or reductions in the scope of our product development programs beyond one year from the filing date ofthis annual report is issued. As such, we believe there is substantial doubt regarding our ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. We have historically funded our operations10-Q is filed with the SEC. The financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should we be unable to continue as a significant extent from capital-raising and we expect to require additional funding in the future, the availability of which is never guaranteed and may be uncertain. We expect that we may continue to incur operating losses.going concern.

 

Basis of Presentation

 

Our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with applicable presentation requirements, and accordingly, do not include all information and disclosures necessary for a presentation of our financial position, results of operations, and cash flows in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. (“GAAP”). In the opinion of management, these financial statements reflect all adjustments, consisting primarily of normal recurring accruals necessary for a fair statement of results for the periods presented. The results of operations for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results for the full year.

 

Our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018.2019. The year-end consolidated balance sheet data in these financial statements were derived from audited financial statements but do not include all disclosures required by GAAP.

 

Principles of Consolidation

 

The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Progenics as well as its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All material intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.

10

 

Use of Estimates

 

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results may differ from those estimates.

 

Revenue Recognition

 

We recognize revenue when our customers obtain control of the promised goods or services, in an amount that reflects the consideration which we expect to receive in exchange for those goods or services. To account for our revenue arrangements, we perform the following five steps: (i) identify the contract(s) with a customer; (ii) identify the performance obligations in the contract; (iii) determine the transaction price, including variable consideration, if any; (iv) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract; and (v) recognize revenue when (or as) we satisfy our performance obligations.

 

For contracts determined to be within the scope of ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) (“ASU 2014-09” or the “Topic 606”), we assess the goods or services promised within each contract for the purpose of identifying them as performance obligations. We must apply judgement in assessing whether each promised good or service is distinct. If a promised good or service is not distinct, we will combine that good or service with other promised goods or services until it identifies a bundle of goods or services that is distinct.

 

The transaction price is then determined and allocated to the identified performance obligations in proportion to their estimated fair value, which requires significant judgment. Variable consideration, which is estimated using the expected value method or the most likely amount method, is included in the transaction price only if, in our judgment, it is probable that a significant future reversal of cumulative revenue under the contract will not occur.

 

10

For arrangements that include development, regulatory or sales milestone payments, we evaluate whether the milestones are probable of being reached and estimate the amount to be included in the transaction price using the most likely amount method. If it is probable that a significant revenue reversal would not occur, the associated milestone value is included in the transaction price. Milestone payments that are not within our control or the licensee’s control, such as regulatory approvals, are generally not considered probable of being achieved until those approvals are received.

 

We then recognize as revenue the amount of the transaction price that is allocated to the respective performance obligation when (or as) the performance obligation is satisfied.

 

The following table summarizes our revenue streams from contracts with customers for the three and six months ended June 30,March 31, 2020 and 2019 and 2018 (in thousands):

 

 

Three months ended June 30,

  

Six months ended June 30,

  

Three months ended March 31,

 
 

2019

  

2018

  

2019

  

2018

  

2020

  

2019

 

Product sales

 $270  $-  $270  $-  $1,359  $- 

Royalty income

  3,593   3,530   7,754   6,588   4,789   4,161 

License and other revenue

  6,103   348   6,223   479   100   120 

Total revenue

 $9,966  $3,878  $14,247  $7,067  $6,248  $4,281 

ProductProduct sales – represent revenue from sales of AZEDRA directly to hospitals. Our performance obligations are to provide AZEDRA based on sales orders from hospitals, which have been verified by our commercial team as properly credentialed to receive, handle, administer and dispose of radioactive materials. We recognize revenue after the customer takes title and has obtained control of the product. Our contracts with hospitals stipulate that product is shipped free on boardon-board destination. We invoice hospitals after the products have been delivered and invoice payments are generally due within 60 days of invoice date. We record sales to hospitals based on AZEDRA’s list price per mCi and the amount prescribed based upon a dosimetric assessment of each patient. We record product sales net of any variable consideration due to rebates and discounts provided under governmental and other programs, and other sales-related deductions, such as product returns and copay assistance programs. Shipping and handling costs associated with finished goods delivered to customers are recorded as a selling expense.

 

Royalty income – represents revenue from the sales-based royalties under our intellectual property licensing arrangements and is recognized upon net sales of the licensed products.

 

11

License and other revenuerepresentsrepresent revenue from upfront payments (fixed consideration) and development and sales milestones, sublicense payments, support and service payments and sales-based bonus payments (variable consideration) under our licensing or software arrangements. The fixed consideration will be recognized as revenue at the time when the transfer of know-how is completed. The variable consideration will be estimated using the most likely amount method and recognized only when we have “a high degree of confidence” that revenue will not be reversed in a subsequent reporting period. The other revenue also includes revenue from product sales of research reagents, that is recognized upon shipment to the end customer (i.e. control of the product is deemed to be transferred).

 

We had receivable contract balances of $10.6$6.2 million and $3.8$16.0 million as of June 30, 2019March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2018,2019, respectively, primarily related to the royalty revenue and upfrontstream and milestone paymentspayment receivable as of December 31, 2019 under our partnerships, which are included in license and other revenuepartnership with Bausch Health Companies, Inc. (“Bausch”) (see Note 5. 5. Accounts Receivable).

 

Restricted Cash

 

Restricted cash included in long-term assets of $3.3$2.7 million and $1.5$3.0 million at June 30, 2019March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2018,2019, respectively, represents collateral for a letter of credit securing a lease obligation, (for both periods), collateral for a letter of credit related to equipment purchases and a security deposit with the German District Court related to the PSMA-617 litigation (for the 2019 period).litigation. We believe the carrying value of this asset approximates fair value.

11

Table of Contents

 

Foreign Currency Translation

 

Our international subsidiaries generally consider their respective local currency to be their functional currency. Assets and liabilities of these international subsidiaries are translated into U.S. dollars at quarter-end exchange rates and revenues and expenses are translated at average exchange rates during the quarter and year-to-date period. Foreign currency translation adjustments for the reported periods are included in accumulated other comprehensive loss in our condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive loss, and the cumulative effect is included in the stockholders’ equity section of our condensed consolidated balance sheets. Realized gains and losses denominated in foreign currencies are recorded in operating expenses in our condensed consolidated statements of operations and were not material to our consolidated results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019March 31, 2020 or 2018.2019.

 

Leases

 

We determine whether an arrangement is or contains a lease at its inception. We recognize lease liabilities based on the present value of the minimum lease payments not yet paid by using the lease term and discount rate determined at lease commencement. As most of our leases do not provide an implicit rate, we use our incremental borrowing rate to determine the present value of our lease payments. Our leases may include options to extend or terminate a lease when it is reasonably certain that we will exercise that option. We recognize the operating right-of-use (“ROU”) lease assets at amounts equal to the lease liability adjusted for prepaid or accrued rent, remaining balance of any lease incentives and unamortized initial direct costs.

 

The operating lease liabilities are reported in other current liabilities and other noncurrent liabilities and the related ROU lease assets are reported in other noncurrent assets on our condensed consolidated balance sheets. Lease expense for our operating leases is calculated on a straight-line basis over the lease term and is reported in research and development and selling, general and administrative expenses on our condensed consolidated statements of operations. We do not recognize a lease liability or ROU lease assets for leases whose lease terms, at commencement, are twelve months or less, or for leases which are below the established capitalization threshold.

 

Property and Equipment

 

Property and equipment is recorded at historical cost, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization of $3.1$4.3 million and $2.7$3.8 million as of June 30, 2019March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2018,2019, respectively. The following table summarizes our property and equipment (in thousands):

 

 

June 30,

  

December 31,

  

March 31,

  

December 31,

 
 

2019

  

2018

  

2020

  

2019

 

Machinery and equipment

 $3,949  $2,992  $6,809  $5,204 

Leasehold improvements

  3,052   1,734   3,621   3,204 

Computer equipment

  632   721   710   691 

Furniture and fixtures

  909   878   908   908 

Construction in progress

  1,612   317   6,884   5,475 

Property and equipment, gross

  10,154   6,642   18,932   15,482 

Less - accumulated depreciation

  (3,146)  (2,698)  (4,259)  (3,794)

Property and equipment, net

 $7,008  $3,944  $14,673  $11,688 

 

12

 

Note 2. New Accounting Pronouncements 

 

Recently Adopted

 

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02 (“ASU 2016-02”), Leases (Topic 842). This standard established a right-of-use model that requires all lessees to recognize right-of-use assets and liabilities on their balance sheet that arise from leases with terms longer than 12 months as well as provide disclosures with respect to certain qualitative and quantitative information related to their leasing arrangements.

The FASB has subsequently issued the following amendments to ASU 2016-02, which have the same effective date and transition date of January 1, 2019, and which we collectively refer to as the new leasing standards:

ASU No. 2018-01, Leases (Topic 842): Land Easement Practical Expedient for Transition to Topic 842, which permits an entity to elect an optional transition practical expedient to not evaluate under Topic 842 land easements that exist or expired prior to adoption of Topic 842 and that were not previously accounted for as leases under the prior standard, ASC 840, Leases.

12

ASU No. 2018-10, Codification Improvements to Topic 842, Leases, which amends certain narrow aspects of the guidance issued in ASU 2016-02.

ASU No. 2018-11, Leases (Topic 842): Targeted Improvements, which allows for a transition approach to initially apply ASU 2016-02 at the adoption date and recognize a cumulative-effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings in the period of adoption as well as an additional practical expedient for lessors to not separate non-lease components from the associated lease component.

ASU No. 2018-20, Narrow-Scope Improvements for Lessors, which contains certain narrow scope improvements to the guidance issued in ASU 2016-02.

ASU No. 2019-01, Leases (Topic 842): Codification Improvements.

We adopted the new leasing standards on January 1, 2019, using a modified retrospective transition approach to be applied to leases existing as of, or entered into after, January 1, 2019 and did not adjust comparative periods. We also elected the package of practical expedients permitted under this standard, which among other things, allowed us to carry forward the lease classification for our existing leases. In preparation for the adoption of this standard and to enable preparation of the required financial information, we implemented new internal controls and processes.

The adoption of this standard impacted our 2019 opening consolidated balance sheet as we recorded operating lease liabilities of $15.3 million and ROU lease assets of $13.5 million, which equals the lease liabilities net of deferred rent and lease incentives previously recorded on our balance sheet under the old guidance. The adoption of this standard did not have an impact on our consolidated statements of operations or cash flows.

Recently Issued

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-13 (“ASU 2018-13”), Fair Value Measurement - Disclosure Framework (Topic 820): Disclosure Framework – Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement. The updated guidance improves the disclosure requirements on fair value measurements. ASU 2018-13 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2019. EarlyWe adopted this standard on January 1, 2020. The adoption is permitted for any removed or modified disclosures. We are currently assessing the timing of adopting the updated provisions and thethis standard did not have a material impact of the updated provisions on our consolidated financial statements.

Recently Issued

 

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments. In November 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-19, Codification Improvements to Topic 326, Financial Instruments-Credit Losses and in April 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-04, Codification Improvements to Topic 326,Financial Instruments—Credit Losses,Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging, andTopic 825, FinancialInstruments, which amend the scope and transition requirements of ASU 2016-13. The standard requires a financial asset (or a group of financial assets) measured at amortized cost basis to be presented at the net amount expected to be collected. The measurement of expected credit losses is based on relevant information about past events, including historical experience, current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts that affect the collectability of the reported amount. In May 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-05, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326) (Topic 326): Targeted Transition Relief.Relief. This ASU addresses certain stakeholders’ concerns by providing an option to irrevocably elect the fair value option for certain financial assets previously measured at amortized cost basis. For those entities, the targeted transition relief will increase comparability of financial statement information by providing an option to align measurement methodologies for similar financial assets. Furthermore, the targeted transition relief also may reduce the costs for some entities to comply with the amendments in Update 2016-13 while still providing financial statement users with decision-useful information. In November 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-10, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326), Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815), and Leases (Topic 842): Effective Date. This ASU extended and simplified how effective dates are staggered between larger public companies (bucket one) and all other entities (bucket two). ASU 2016-13 is effective for SEC filers, excluding entities eligible to be smaller reporting companies, for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2019 and beginning after December 15, 2022 for all other public business entities. As a smaller reporting company, we are currently evaluating the impact this guidance will have on our consolidated financial statements.

In December 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-12, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes. The standard isamendments in this update simplify the accounting for income taxes by removing certain exceptions to the general principles in Topic 740. The amendments also improve consistent application of and simplify GAAP for other areas of Topic 740 by clarifying and amending existing guidance. For public business entities, the amendments in this Update are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2019.2020. For all other entities, the amendments are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2021, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2022. Early adoption of the amendments is permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact this guidance will have on our consolidated financial statements.

 

 

Note 3. Net Loss Per Share

 

Our basic net loss per share amounts have been computed by dividing net loss by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. For the three and six months ended June 30,March 31, 2020 and 2019, and 2018, we reported net losses and, accordingly, potential common shares were not included since such inclusion would have been anti-dilutive.

 

13

 

The calculations of net loss per share, basic and diluted, are as follows (amounts in thousands, except per share data):

 

     

Weighted-Average

          

Weighted-Average

     
     

Shares

          

Shares

     
 

Net Loss

  

Outstanding

  

Per Share

  

Net Loss

  

Outstanding

  

Per Share

 
 

(Numerator)

  

(Denominator)

  

Amount

  

(Numerator)

  

(Denominator)

  

Amount

 

Three months ended June 30, 2019

            

Three months ended March 31, 2020

            

Basic and diluted

 $(19,700)  85,000  $(0.23) $(16,801)  86,582  $(0.19)

Six months ended June 30, 2019

            

Three months ended March 31, 2019

            

Basic and diluted

 $(38,435)  84,772  $(0.45) $(18,735)  84,542  $(0.22)
            

Three months ended June 30, 2018

            

Basic and diluted

 $(15,172)  74,017  $(0.20)

Six months ended June 30, 2018

            

Basic and diluted

 $(28,596)  73,271  $(0.39)

 

The following table summarizes anti-dilutive common shares or common shares where performance conditions have not been met, that were excluded from the calculation of diluted net loss per share (in thousands):

 

 

Three Months Ended June 30,

  

Six Months Ended June 30,

  

Three Months Ended March 31,

 
 

2019

  

2018

  

2019

  

2018

  

2020

  

2019

 

Stock options

  6,298   3,237   6,382   3,236   6,597   6,522 

Contingent consideration liability (1)

  778   2,351   778   2,351   947   2,565 

Total securities excluded

  7,076   5,588   7,160   5,587   7,544   9,087 

 


(1) Calculated as follows: (a) the contingent consideration liability balance divided by (b) the closing stock price of our common stock.

 

 

Note 4. Fair Value Measurements

 

To estimate the fair values of our financial assets and liabilities, we use valuation approaches within a hierarchy that maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs by requiring that observable inputs be used when available. Observable inputs are inputs that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability based on market data obtained from sources independent of us. Unobservable inputs are inputs that reflect our assumptions about the inputs that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability and are developed based on the best information available in the circumstances. The fair value hierarchy is divided into three levels based on the source of inputs as follows:

 

Level 1 – Valuations based on unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that we have the ability to access

Level 2 – Valuations for which all significant inputs are observable, either directly or indirectly, other than Level 1 inputs

Level 3 – Valuations based on inputs that are unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement

 

The availability of observable inputs can vary among the various types of financial assets and liabilities. To the extent that the valuation is based on models or inputs that are less observable or unobservable in the market, the determination of fair value requires more judgment. In certain cases, the inputs used for measuring fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, for financial statement disclosure purposes, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement is categorized is based on the lowest level of input used that is significant to the overall fair value measurement.

 

We believe the carrying amounts of our cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivable, other current assets, other assets, accounts payable and accrued expenses approximated their fair values as of June 30, 2019March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2018.2019.

 

We record the contingent consideration liability resulting from our acquisition of Molecular Insight Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“MIP”)MIP at fair value in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 820 (Topic 820, Fair Value Measurement).

 

14

 

The following tables summarize each major class of our financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of the dates indicated, classified by valuation hierarchy (in thousands):

 

     

Fair Value Measurements at June 30, 2019

      

Fair Value Measurements at March 31, 2020

 
     

Quoted Prices

in Active

  

Significant Other

  

Significant

      

Quoted Prices

in Active

  

Significant

Other

  

Significant

 
 Balance at  

Markets for

  

Observable

  

Unobservable

      

Markets for

  

Observable

  

Unobservable

 
 June 30,  

Identical Assets

  

Inputs

  

Inputs

  

Balance at

  

Identical Assets

  

Inputs

  

Inputs

 
 

2019

  

(Level 1)

  

(Level 2)

  

(Level 3)

  

March 31, 2020

  

(Level 1)

  

(Level 2)

  

(Level 3)

 

Assets:

                                

Money market funds

 $82,737  $82,737  $-  $-  $20,744  $20,744  $-  $- 

Total assets

 $82,737  $82,737  $-  $-  $20,744  $20,744  $-  $- 
                                

Liabilities:

                                

Contingent consideration liability

 $4,800  $-  $-  $4,800  $3,600  $-  $-  $3,600 

Total liabilities

 $4,800  $-  $-  $4,800  $3,600  $-  $-  $3,600 

 

     

Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2018

      

Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2019

 
     

Quoted Prices

in Active

  

Significant Other

  

Significant

      

Quoted Prices

in Active

  

Significant

Other

  

Significant

 
 Balance at  

Markets for

  

Observable

  

Unobservable

  Balance at   

Markets for

  

Observable

  

Unobservable

 
 December 31,  

Identical Assets

  

Inputs

  

Inputs

  December 31,  

Identical Assets

  

Inputs

  

Inputs

 
 

2018

  

(Level 1)

  

(Level 2)

  

(Level 3)

  

2019

  

(Level 1)

  

(Level 2)

  

(Level 3)

 

Assets:

                                

Money market funds

 $136,052  $136,052  $-  $-  $35,775  $35,775  $-  $- 

Total assets

 $136,052  $136,052  $-  $-  $35,775  $35,775  $-  $- 
                                

Liabilities:

                                

Contingent consideration liability

 $11,000  $-  $-  $11,000  $3,900  $-  $-  $3,900 

Total liabilities

 $11,000  $-  $-  $11,000  $3,900  $-  $-  $3,900 

 

The contingent consideration liability of $4.8$3.6 million as of June 30, 2019March 31, 2020 represents the estimated fair value of the future potential milestone payments to former MIP stockholders (shown in the tables below).

 

Milestone payments due upon first commercial sale and/or from proceeds received from license revenue (in thousands):

 

Program

 

Consideration

 

Form of Payment

1095  5,000 

Cash or Progenics common stock

1404  9,984 

Cash or Progenics common stock or cash in the case of license revenue

  $14,984  

 

Net sales milestone payments due upon first achievement of specified net sales target in any single calendar year across all MIP-related programs (in thousands):

 

  

Consideration

 

Form of Payment at Progenics' Option

$30 million

 $5,000 

Cash or Progenics common stock

$60 million

  5,000 

Cash or Progenics common stock

$100 million

  10,000 

Cash or Progenics common stock

$250 million

  20,000 

Cash or Progenics common stock

$500 million

  30,000 

Cash or Progenics common stock

  $70,000  

 

We consider this liability a Level 3 instrument (one with significant unobservable inputs) in the fair value hierarchy. The estimated fair value was determined based on probability adjusted discounted cash flow and Monte Carlo simulation models that included significant estimates and assumptions pertaining to commercialization events and sales targets. The most significant unobservable inputs are the probabilities of achieving regulatory approval of the development projects and subsequent commercial success.

 

Significant changes in any of the probabilities of success or the probabilities as to the periods in which milestones will be achieved would result in a significantly higher or lower fair value measurement. We record the contingent consideration liability at fair value with changes in estimated fair values recorded in change in contingent consideration liability in our condensed consolidated statements of operations.

 

15

 

The following table summarizes quantitative information and assumptions pertaining to the fair value measurement of the Level 3 inputs at June 30, 2019March 31, 2020 and December 31, 20182019 (in thousands). The decrease in the contingent consideration liability of $6.2$0.3 million during the sixthree months ended June 30, 2019March 31, 2020 was primarily due to an $8.0 million payment fora decrease in the AZEDRA first commercial sale milestone, which wassales forecasts, partially offset by an increase in the AZEDRA sales forecasts associated with the planned initiation of a basket studydue to expand the label for AZEDRAshorter discount period and a decrease in the discount periodhigher volatility used to calculate the present value of the contingent consideration liability.

 

 

Fair Value at

          

Fair Value at

         
 

June 30,

          

March 31,

         
 

2019

 

Valuation Technique

 

Unobservable Input

 

Assumption

  

2020

 

Valuation Technique

 

Unobservable Input

 

Assumption

 

Contingent Consideration Liability:

                        

1095 commercialization

 $450 

Probability adjusted discounted

 

Probability of success

  18%   $400 

Probability adjusted discounted

 

Probability of success

  18%  
    

cash flow model

 

Period of expected milestone achievement

 

 

2026      

cash flow model

 

Period of expected milestone achievement

  2027  
      

Discount rate

  10%        

Discount rate

  10%  

1404 commercialization

  250 

Probability adjusted discounted

 

Probability of success

  43%    200 

Probability adjusted discounted

 

Probability of success

  43%  
    

cash flow model

 

Period of expected milestone achievement

 2022-2035     

cash flow model

 

Period of expected milestone achievement

  2023-2035 
      

Discount rate

  10%        

Discount rate

  10%  

Net sales targets

  4,100 

Monte-Carlo simulation

 

Probability of success

 18%-90%   3,000 

Monte-Carlo simulation

 

Probability of success

  18%-90% 
      

Discount rate

  10%        

Discount rate

  10%  

Total

 $4,800          $3,600         

 

 

Fair Value at

        

Fair Value at

         
 

December 31,

        

December 31,

         
 

2018

 

Valuation Technique

 

Unobservable Input

 

Assumption

  

2019

 

Valuation Technique

 

Unobservable Input

 

Assumption

 

Contingent Consideration Liability:

                      

AZEDRA commercialization

 $7,050 

Probability adjusted discounted

 

Probability of success

 

 

90%  

1095 commercialization

 $500 

Probability adjusted discounted

 

Probability of success

  18%  
    

cash flow model

 

Period of expected milestone achievement

 

 

2019      

cash flow model

 

Period of expected milestone achievement

  2026  
      

Discount rate

 

 

10%        

Discount rate

  10%  

1095 commercialization

  450 

Probability adjusted discounted

 

Probability of success

 

 

18%  

1404 commercialization

  300 

Probability adjusted discounted

 

Probability of success

  43%  
    

cash flow model

 

Period of expected milestone achievement

 

 

2026      

cash flow model

 

Period of expected milestone achievement

  2022-2035 
      

Discount rate

 

 

10%        

Discount rate

  10%  

Net sales targets

  3,500 

Monte-Carlo simulation

 

Probability of success

 

18%

-90%   3,100 

Monte-Carlo simulation

 

Probability of success

  18%-90% 
      

Discount rate

 

 

10%        

Discount rate

  10%  

Total

 $11,000        $3,900         

 

For those financial instruments with significant Level 3 inputs, the following table summarizes the activities for the periods indicated (in thousands):

 

 

Liability - Contingent Consideration

  

Liability - Contingent Consideration

 
 

Fair Value Measurements Using

  

Fair Value Measurements Using

 
 

Significant Unobservable Inputs

  

Significant Unobservable Inputs

 
 

(Level 3)

  

(Level 3)

 
 

Three Months Ended June 30,

  

Six Months Ended June 30,

  

Three Months Ended March 31,

 
 

2019

  

2018

  

2019

  

2018

  

2020

  

2019

 

Balance at beginning of period

 $11,900  $17,600  $11,000  $16,800  $3,900  $11,000 

Fair value change included in net loss

  916   1,300   1,816   2,100   (300)  900 

Payments

  (8,016)  -   (8,016)  - 

Balance at end of period

 $4,800  $18,900  $4,800  $18,900  $3,600  $11,900 
                        

Changes in unrealized gains or losses for the period included in earnings (or changes in net assets) for liabilities held at the end of the reporting period

 $916  $1,300  $1,816  $2,100  $(300) $900 

 

16

 

 

Note 5. Accounts Receivable

 

Our accounts receivable representrepresents amounts due to us from royalties, collaborators, AZEDRA product sales and, to a small extent, sales of research reagents, and consisted of the following at June 30, 2019March 31, 2020 and December 31, 20182019 (in thousands):

 

  

June 30,

  

December 31,

 
  

2019

  

2018

 

Royalties

 $3,593  $3,151 

Bayer milestone

  2,000   - 

FUJIFILM transfer

  4,000   - 

Other

  976   652 

Accounts receivable, net

 $10,569  $3,803 
  

March 31,

  

December 31,

 
  

2020

  

2019

 

Royalties

 $4,789  $4,304 

Product sales, license and other

  1,401   11,672 

Accounts receivable, net

 $6,190  $15,976 

 

 

Note 6. Recent Acquisition, Goodwill, In-Process Research and Development and Other Intangible Assets

 

Recent Acquisition

In February 2019, we acquired the AZEDRA manufacturing assets for $8.0 million cash consideration and entered into a sublease agreement for the radiopharmaceutical manufacturing facility located in Somerset, New Jersey. The Somerset site serves as the launch facility for AZEDRA and will also provide manufacturing support for the Company’s development stage radiopharmaceuticals, including 1095. The production of AZEDRA uses a proprietary Ultratrace® process which concentrates the MIBG targeted radiolytic activity by eliminating non-therapeutic “cold” MIBG molecules, giving AZEDRA a uniquely high specific activity.

Purchase Price Allocation: We accounted for this acquisition as a business combination by allocating the consideration we paid to the fair values of the assets acquired at the effective date of the acquisition, as summarized below. The difference between the fair value of the acquisition consideration and the estimated fair value of the identifiable assets represents potential future economic benefits arising from the acquisition, and has been recorded as goodwill.

The following table summarizes the allocation of the consideration paid to the estimated fair values of the assets acquired as of the acquisition date (in thousands):

  

Amount

 

Cash consideration

 $8,000 
     

Tangible assets acquired:

    

Machinery and equipment

  682 

Leasehold improvements

  1,300 

Total tangible assets acquired

  1,982 

Intangible assets - Somerset

  1,245 

Total tangible and intangible assets acquired

  3,227 
     

Goodwill

 $4,773 

The replacement cost method, a variation of the cost approach, was applied to assess the value of the assets acquired by Progenics. The principle behind this method is that the value represents the current cost of a similar new asset having the nearest equivalent utility as the asset being valued. It generally represents the maximum amount that a prudent investor will pay for a comparable asset. The cost approach provides a systematic framework for estimating the value of tangible or intangible assets based on the economic principle of substitution, and that no prudent investor will purchase an existing asset for more than it will cost to create a comparable asset. Under this approach, value is estimated by developing the cost to either replace or reproduce (replicate) the asset of similar utility.

The acquired Somerset intangible assets represent manufacturing know-how, which is comprised of documented technical data and information, formulae, standards, specifications, processes, methods, code books, as well as all information, knowledge, trade practices and secrets utilized by the Somerset facility in manufacturing of the AZEDRA. We estimate the remaining useful life of the Somerset intangible to be approximately six years.

17

Goodwill, In-Process Research and Development and Other Intangible Assets

 

The fair values of in-process research and development (“IPR&D”) and other identified intangible assets acquired in business combinations are capitalized. We utilize the “income method,” which applies a probability weighting that considers the risk of development and commercialization to the estimated future net cash flows that are derived from projected sales revenues and estimated costs or “replacement costs”, whichever is greater. These projections are based on factors such as relevant market size, patent protection, historical pricing of similar products and expected industry trends. The estimated future net cash flows are then discounted to the present value using an appropriate discount rate. This analysis is performed for each IPR&D project and other identified intangible assets, independently. IPR&D assets are treated as indefinite-lived intangible assets until completion or abandonment of the projects, at which time the assets are amortized over the remaining useful life or written off, as appropriate. Other identified intangible assets, which include the technology asset acquired as part of the EXINI business combination, AZEDRA product rights intangible and Somerset intangible, are amortized over the relevant estimated useful lives. The IPR&D assets are tested for impairment at least annually or when a triggering event occurs that could indicate a potential impairment and any impairment loss is recognized in our condensed consolidated statements of operations.

 

Goodwill represents excess consideration in a business combination over the fair value of identifiable net assets acquired. Goodwill is not amortized but is subject to impairment testing at least annually or when a triggering event occurs that could indicate a potential impairment. We determine whether goodwill may be impaired by comparing the fair value of the reporting unit (we have determined that we have only one reporting unit for this purpose), calculated as the product of shares outstanding and the share price as of the end of a period, to its carrying value (for this purpose, our total stockholders’ equity). No goodwill impairment has been recognized as of June 30, 2019March 31, 2020 or 2018.2019.

 

The following tables summarize the activity related to our goodwill and intangible assets (in thousands):

 

          

Other

 
          

Intangible

 
  

Goodwill

  

IPR&D

  

Assets

 

Balance at January 1, 2019

 $13,074  $600  $6,066 

Increase related to Somerset acquisition

  4,773   -   1,245 

Amortization expense

  -   -   (536)

Balance at June 30, 2019

 $17,847  $600  $6,775 
          

Other

 
          

Intangible

 
  

Goodwill

  

IPR&D

  

Assets

 

Balance at January 1, 2020

 $17,847  $600  $6,223 

Amortization expense

  -   -   (276)

Balance at March 31, 2020

 $17,847  $600  $5,947 

 

          

Other

 
          

Intangible

 
  

Goodwill

  

IPR&D

  

Assets

 

Balance at January 1, 2018

 $13,074  $28,700  $1,669 

Amortization expense

  -   -   (106)

Balance at June 30, 2018

 $13,074  $28,700  $1,563 
          

Other

 
          

Intangible

 
  

Goodwill

  

IPR&D

  

Assets

 

Balance at January 1, 2019

 $13,074  $600  $6,066 

Increase related to Somerset acquisition

 $4,773  $-  $1,245 

Amortization expense

  -   -   (260)

Balance at March 31, 2019

 $17,847  $600  $7,051 

 

The following table reflects the components of the finite-lived intangible assets as of June 30, 2019March 31, 2020 (in thousands):

 

 

Gross Amount

  

Accumulated Amortization

  

Net Carrying Value

  

Gross Amount

  

Accumulated Amortization

  

Net Carrying Value

 

Intangible assets - AZEDRA product rights

 $4,900  $642  $4,258  $4,900  $1,167  $3,733 

Intangible assets - Somerset

  1,245   80   1,165   1,245   223   1,022 

Intangible assets - EXINI technology

  2,120   768   1,352   2,120   928   1,192 

Total

 $8,265  $1,490  $6,775  $8,265  $2,318  $5,947 

17

 

 

Note 7. Accrued Expenses

 

The carrying value of our accrued expenses approximates fair value, as it represents amounts that will be satisfied within one year. Accrued expenses consisted of the following at June 30, 2019March 31, 2020 and December 31, 20182019 (in thousands):

 

 

June 30,

  

December 31,

  

March 31,

  

December 31,

 
 

2019

  

2018

  

2020

  

2019

 

Accrued legal and professional fees

 $6,763  $1,305  $1,783  $1,889 

Accrued clinical trial costs

  4,514   2,318 

Accrued payroll and related costs

  2,254   2,871   1,241   2,795 

Accrued contract manufacturing costs

  1,753   2,516   1,906   5,114 

Accrued clinical trial costs

  1,805   1,489 

Accrued consulting costs

  734   862   554   1,117 

Other

  920   661   1,094   699 

Accrued expenses

 $16,938  $10,533  $8,383  $13,103 

 

18

Table of Contents

 

Note 8. Commitments and Contingencies

Consulting Agreement

On March 4, 2020, we entered into a consulting services agreement with Patrick Fabbio, with a term commencing on March 27, 2020 and continuing until the earlier of the effective date of the proposed merger with Lantheus Holdings or May 15, 2020 unless terminated by either party as set forth therein (the “Consulting Agreement”). Under the Consulting Agreement, Mr. Fabbio will provide consulting services as requested by us. In consideration for Mr. Fabbio’s services, the Consulting Agreement provides that, if the proposed merger is consummated on or before July 1, 2020, Mr. Fabbio will be paid $180,000 upon consummation of the proposed merger. This payment was originally provided for in his retention agreement with Progenics, except that such payment will now be made in a single lump sum upon the closing of the proposed merger with Lantheus Holdings and will not be contingent on Mr. Fabbio’s continued service with Progenics after the closing of the proposed merger.

Legal Proceedings

 

We are or may be involved in disputes, governmental and/or regulatory inspections, inquiries, investigations, and proceedings that could result in litigation, and other litigation matters that arise from time to time. The process of resolving matters through litigation or other means is inherently uncertain and it is possible that an unfavorable resolution of these matters will adversely affect us, our results of operations, financial condition, and cash flows. While it is not possible to accurately predict or determine the eventual outcomes of these items, an adverse determination in one or more of these items currently pending could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations, financial position, or cash flows.

 

AbbreviatedAbbreviated New Drug Application Application Litigations

RELISTOR Subcutaneous Injection

 

Paragraph IV Certifications - Mylan

 

On or about October 6, 2015, November 20, 2015, December 22, 2015, and December 23, 2015, Progenics, Salix Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Salix”) and Wyeth LLC (“Wyeth”) received four separate notifications of a Paragraph IV certification for RELISTOR (methylnaltrexone bromide) subcutaneous injection, for certain patents that are listed in the FDA’s Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations, also known as “the Orange Book.” The certifications resulted from the filing by Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. of an Abbreviated New Drug Application (“ANDA”) with the FDA, challenging such patents for RELISTOR subcutaneous injection and seeking to obtain approval to market a generic version of RELISTOR subcutaneous injection before some or all of these patents expire.

18

Paragraph IV Certification – Actavis

On or about October 27, 2015, January 5, 2016, and January 8, 2016, Progenics, Salix and Wyeth received three separate notifications of a Paragraph IV certification for certain patents for RELISTOR (methylnaltrexone bromide) subcutaneous injection, for certain patents that are listed in the FDA’s Orange Book. The certifications resulted from the filing by Actavis LLC of an ANDA with the FDA, challenging such patents for RELISTOR subcutaneous injection and seeking to obtain approval to market a generic version of RELISTOR subcutaneous injection before some or all of these patents expire.

 

District Court Actions

 

Progenics, Salix, Valeant (now Bausch Health Companies Inc., “Bausch”), and Wyeth filed suit against Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Mylan Inc. in the District of New Jersey on November 19, 2015 (2:15-cv-8180-SRC-CLW) seeking declaratory judgment of infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,247,425, 8,420,663, 8,552,025, and 8,822,490 based upon Mylan Pharmaceutical Inc.’s filing of its ANDA seeking to obtain approval to market a generic version of RELISTOR vials before some or all of these patents expire. On February 4, 2016, Progenics, Salix, Bausch, and Wyeth filed an amended complaint, identifying Mylan Laboratories Ltd. as an additional Defendant, and further seeking declaratory judgment of infringement of U.S. Patent No. 9,180,125. Progenics, Salix, Bausch, and Wyeth filed suit against Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Mylan Laboratories Ltd., and Mylan Inc. in the District of New Jersey on January 4, 2016 (2:16-cv-00035-SRC-CLW) seeking declaratory judgment of infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,247,425, 8,420,663, 8,552,025, and 8,822,490 based upon Mylan Pharmaceutical Inc.’s filing of its ANDA seeking to obtain approval to market a generic version of RELISTOR prefilled syringes before some or all of these patents expire. On January 25, 2016, Progenics, Salix, Bausch, and Wyeth filed an amended complaint, further seeking declaratory judgment of infringement of U.S. Patent No. 9,180,125. Progenics, Salix, Bausch, and Wyeth filed suit against Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Mylan Laboratories Ltd., and Mylan Inc. in the District of New Jersey on September 1, 2017 (2:17-cv-06714-SRC-CLW) seeking declaratory judgment of infringement of U.S. Patent No. 9,669,096 based upon Mylan Pharmaceutical Inc.’s filing of ANDAs seeking to obtain approval to market generic versions of RELISTOR vials and prefilled syringes before the patents expires. On September 18, 2017, Progenics, Salix, Bausch, and Wyeth filed an amended complaint, further seeking declaratory judgment of infringement of U.S. Patent No. 9,492,445.

 

Progenics, Salix, Bausch, and Wyeth filed suit against Actavis LLC, Actavis, Inc., Actavis Elizabeth LLC, and Allergan PLC fka Actavis PLC in the District of New Jersey on November 30, 2015 (2:15-cv-08353-SRC-CLW) seeking declaratory judgment of infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,247,425, 8,420,663, 8,552,025, and 8,822,490 based upon Actavis LLC’s filing of an ANDA seeking to obtain approval to market a generic version of RELISTOR prefilled syringes before some or all of these patents expire. On February 18, 2016, Progenics, Salix, Bausch, and Wyeth filed an amended complaint, further seeking declaratory judgment of infringement of U.S. Patent No. 9,180,125. Progenics, Salix, Bausch, and Wyeth filed suit against Actavis LLC, Actavis, Inc., Actavis Elizabeth LLC, and Allergan PLC fka Actavis PLC in the District of New Jersey on February 18, 2016 (2:16-cv-00889-SRC-CLW) seeking declaratory judgment of infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,247,425, 8,420,663, 8,552,025 and 8,822,490 based upon Actavis LLC’s filing of an ANDA seeking to obtain approval to market a generic version of RELISTOR vials before some or all of these patents expire. Progenics, Salix, Bausch, and Wyeth filed suit against Actavis LLC, Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., and Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. in the District of New Jersey on August 18, 2017 (2:17-cv-07206-SRC-CLW) seeking declaratory judgment of infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 9,669,096 and 9,492,445 based upon Actavis LLC’s filing of ANDAs seeking to obtain approval to market generic versions of RELISTOR vials and prefilled syringes before the patents expires.

The 2:15-cv-8180-SRC-CLW, 2:16-cv-00035-SRC-CLW, 2:15-cv-08353-SRC-CLW, and 2:16-cv-00889-SRC-CLW actions were consolidated into a single action in the District of New Jersey (2:15-cv-08180-SRC-CLW). On May 1, 2018, the Court granted Plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment as to the validity of claim 8 of U.S. Patent No. 8,552,025. On May 23, 2018, the Court entered an order for final judgment under Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b) in favor of Plaintiffs and against Mylan as to claim 8 of the ’025 patent. On May 16, 2018, trial on the merits was adjourned in the 15-8180 action so that the trial could be consolidated with trial for 17-6714 action.

 

The 2:17-cv-06714-SRC-CLW and 2:17-cv-07206-SRC-CLW were consolidated into a single action in the District of New Jersey (2:17-cv-06714-SRC-CLW). Litigation in the 2:17-cv-06714-SRC-CLW action is underway. Fact discovery in this action has closed and expert discovery deadlines have not yet been set. This action has been consolidated for purposes of trial only with the 2:15-cv-8180 action.

 

19

Federal Circuit Appeal

On May 25, 2018, Mylan filed a Notice of Appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. The matter is currently pending on appeal at the Federal Circuit.

On July 9, 2018, Bausch and Salix filed a motion to disqualify Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP as counsel for Mylan. On July 17, 2018, an order was issued stating the briefing on the merits of Mylan’s appeal pending the disposition of the motion to disqualify. Oral argument was held on September 12, 2018. A decision disqualifying Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP as counsel for Mylan was issued on February 8, 2019, by the Federal Circuit. Merits briefing is currently underway. Mylan submitted its opening brief on April 9, 2019. Plaintiffs filed their responsive brief on July 2, 2019. Mylan filed its reply brief on August 6, 2019.

Paragraph IV Certification – Actavis

On or about October 27, 2015, January 5, 2016, and January 8, 2016, Progenics, Salix and Wyeth received three separate notifications of a Paragraph IV certification for certain patents for RELISTOR (methylnaltrexone bromide) subcutaneous injection, for certain patents that are listed in the FDA’s Orange Book. The certifications resulted from the filing by Actavis LLC of an ANDA with the FDA, challenging such patents for RELISTOR subcutaneous injection and seeking to obtain approval to market a generic version of RELISTOR subcutaneous injection before some or all of these patents expire.

 

Settlement Agreement - Actavis

 

On May 25, 2018, Progenics, Bausch, Salix, Wyeth (Progenics, Bausch and Salix, each “Plaintiff” and collectively “Plaintiffs”) and Actavis LLC (“Actavis”) entered into a Settlement and License Agreement (the “Actavis Agreement”) relating to Civil Action No. 2:15-cv-08180 and Civil Action No. 2:17-cv-06714. The following is a summary of the material terms of the Actavis Agreement. The Actavis Agreement provides for a full settlement and release by both Plaintiffs and Actavis of all claims that were or could have been asserted in the District Court Casesdistrict court cases and all resulting damages or other remedies. Plaintiffs and Actavis have agreed to and, in fact, filed a Stipulated Consent Judgment and Injunction after the execution of the Actavis Agreement. Plaintiffs and Actavis have further acknowledged and agreed that the 30-month stay imposed by the FDA in relation to the approval of Actavis’ ANDAs for the Actavis Products (the “Actavis ANDAs”) should be terminated.

 

Under the Actavis Agreement, Plaintiffs grant Actavis a non-exclusive, royalty-free, non-transferable, non-sublicensable, limited license under the Patents-In-Suit to make, import, and sell each of the Actavis Products in the U.S. beginning on the earliest of (a) January 1, 2028; (b) for each of the Actavis Products, if Actavis is a “First Applicant” (as defined in 21. U.S.C. § 355(j)(5)(B)(iv)(II)) and has not forfeited, relinquished or otherwise waived its 180-day exclusivity, 180 days prior to the date on which an entity not a First Applicant is permitted to commercially sell such Actavis Product in the U.S. under authorization from Plaintiffs; (c) for each of the Actavis Products, if Actavis either is not a First Applicant or otherwise has forfeited, relinquished or otherwise waived its 180-day exclusivity, the earlier of (i) 181 days after any third party that is a First Applicant markets a corresponding single-dose vial or pre-filled syringe that has been FDA approved or submitted for approval under an ANDA as a generic version of RELISTOR® Injection for subcutaneous use (the “Generic Products”) in the U.S., or (ii) the date on which a third party that is either not a First Applicant or otherwise has waived its 180-day exclusivity markets, or is first authorized by Plaintiffs to begin marketing, such Generic Product; (d) for each of the Actavis Products, the date on which a third party that has sought or received approval from the FDA under a “New Drug Application” (as defined in the US Federal Drug and Cosmetic Act and regulations promulgated thereunder) (“NDA”) for a corresponding single-dose vial or pre-filled syringe of methylnaltrexone bromide for subcutaneous use for which RELISTOR® Injection is the listed drug (a “Section 505(b)(2) Applicant”) markets or is first authorized by Plaintiffs to begin marketing such corresponding product; (e) for each of the Actavis Products, the date on which a corresponding generic version of the single-dose vial or pre-filled syringe of methylnaltrexone bromide for subcutaneous use approved under NDA No. 021964 for RELISTOR® Injection that is marketed or intended for marketing in the U.S. without the RELISTOR® trademark (an “Authorized Generic Product”) is first marketed in the U.S. by a third party; or (f) the earlier of (i) the date on which a final court decision is entered holding that each of the unexpired claims of the Patents-In-Suit are invalid and/or unenforceable, or (ii) the date on which the Patents-In-Suit have expired, been permanently abandoned, or delisted from the Orange Book. The Actavis Agreement also gives Actavis a limited right to grant sublicenses to its affiliates for certain pre-marketing activities.

 

20

Appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (“CAFC”). The matter is currently pending on appeal at the Federal Circuit.

On July 9, 2018, Bausch and Salix filed a motion to disqualify Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP as counsel for Mylan. On July 17, 2018, an order was issued stating the briefing on the merits of Mylan’s appeal pending the disposition of the motion to disqualify. Oral argument was held on September 12, 2018. A decision disqualifying Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP as counsel for Mylan was issued on February 8, 2019, by the Federal Circuit. Merits briefing has concluded. Mylan submitted its opening brief on April 9, 2019. Plaintiffs filed their responsive brief on July 2, 2019. Mylan filed its reply brief on August 6, 2019. Oral argument was held on February 4, 2020. On April 8, 2020, the CAFC issued its decision reversing the district court’s grant of summary judgment and remanding for further proceedings. The current deadline for Plaintiffs to file a petition for rehearing/rehearing en banc is May 8, 2020. On April 22, 2020, Plaintiffs filed a motion to extend the deadline to file a petition for rehearing/rehearing en banc to June 22, 2020.

 

Paragraph IV Certification - Par

 

On or about July 15, 2017, Progenics, Salix and Wyeth received notification of a Paragraph IV certification for RELISTOR (methylnaltrexone bromide) subcutaneous injection, for certain patents that are listed in the FDA’s Orange Book. The certification resulted from the filing by Par Sterile Products, LLC (“Par Sterile”) of an ANDA with the FDA, challenging such patents for RELISTOR subcutaneous injection and seeking to obtain approval to market a generic version of RELISTOR subcutaneous injection before some or all of these patents expire.

 

District Court Actions

 

Progenics, Salix, Bausch, and Wyeth filed suit against Par Sterile Products, Par Pharmaceutical, Inc. (“Par Pharmaceutical” and, together with Par Sterile, “Par”), and Endo International plc in the District of New Jersey on August 25, 2017 (2:17-cv-06449-SRC-CLW) seeking declaratory judgment of infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,247,425, 8,420,663, 8,552,025, 8,822,490, 9,180,125, and 9,669,096 based upon Par Sterile Product’s filing of an ANDA seeking to obtain approval to market a generic version of RELISTOR vials before some or all of these patents expire.

 

Progenics, Salix, Bausch, and Wyeth filed suit against Par Sterile Products, Par Pharmaceutical, and Endo International plc in the Southern District of New York on August 25, 2017 (1:17-cv-06557-PAE) seeking declaratory judgment of infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,247,425, 8,420,663, 8,552,025, 8,822,490, 9,180,125, and 9,669,096 based upon Par Sterile Product’s filing of an ANDA seeking to obtain approval to market a generic version of RELISTOR vials before some or all of these patents expire. This action was voluntarily dismissed on November 30, 2017.

 

Settlement Agreement - Par

 

On May 10, 2018, Progenics, Bausch, Salix, Wyeth and Par entered into a Settlement and License Agreement (the “Par Agreement”) relating to Civil Action No. 17-06449-SRC-CLW (the “District Court Case”).17-06449-SRC-CLW. The following is a summary of the material terms of the Par Agreement.

 

The Par Agreement provides for a full settlement and release by both Plaintiffs and Par of all claims that were or could have been asserted in the District Court Casedistrict court case and all resulting damages or other remedies. Plaintiffs and Par have agreed to and, in fact, filed a Stipulated Consent Judgment and Injunction after the execution of the Par Agreement. Plaintiffs and Par have further acknowledged and agreed that the 30-month stay imposed by the FDA in relation to the approval of Par’s ANDA for the Par Products (the “Par ANDA”) should be terminated.

 

Under the Par Agreement, Plaintiffs grant Par a non-exclusive, royalty-free, non-transferable, non-sublicensable, limited license under the Patents-In-Suit to make, import, and sell the Par Products in the U.S., or make outside the U.S. solely for importation into the U.S. (the “Par License”) beginning on the earliest of (i) September 30, 2030; (ii) for either of the Par Products, one hundred eighty-one (181) days after any third party who is the “First Applicant” (as defined in 21. U.S.C. § 355(j)(5)(B)(iv)(II)) markets a single-dose vial or pre-filled syringe that has been FDA approved or submitted for approval under an ANDA as a generic version of RELISTOR® Injection for subcutaneous use (the “Generic Products”); (iii) for either of the Par Products, the date on which a non-First Applicant third party markets an authorized generic (under the RELISTOR® New Drug Application (“NDA”)NDA) but without the RELISTOR® trademark) single-dose vial or pre-filled syringe of methylnaltrexone bromide for subcutaneous use in the U.S.; (iv) for either of the Par Products, the date on which a third party who is not a First Applicant (or who is a First Applicant who has forfeited or otherwise waived its 180-day exclusivity) markets or is first authorized by Plaintiffs to market the Generic Products in the U.S.; (v) the date on which a final court decision is entered holding that each of the asserted claims against Par in the District Court Casedistrict court case from the Patents-In-Suit are invalid and/or unenforceable, or not infringed by the single-dose vial Par Product; or (vi) the date on which the Patents-In-Suit have expired, been permanently abandoned or delisted from the FDA’s Orange Book. Plaintiffs have also granted to Par a limited pre-commercialization license to manufacture and/or import the Par Products into the U.S. starting one hundred fifty (150) days prior to the effective date of the Par License solely to the extent reasonably necessary to enable Par to market the Par Products in the U.S. on or after the effective date of the Par License.

 

RELISTOR Tablets - Actavis

 

Paragraph IV Certifications

 

On or about October 24, 2016 and October 24, 2017, Progenics, Salix, Bausch and Wyeth received two separate notifications of a Paragraph IV certification for RELISTOR (methylnaltrexone bromide) tablets, for certain patents that are listed in the FDA’s Orange Book. The certification resulted from the filing by Actavis Laboratories Fl., Inc. (“Actavis”) of an ANDA with the FDA, challenging such patents for RELISTOR tablets and seeking to obtain approval to market a generic version of RELISTOR tablets before some or all of these patents expire.

 

District Court Actions

 

Progenics, Salix, Bausch, and Wyeth filed suit against Actavis, Actavis LLC, Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., and Teva Pharmaceuticals Industries Ltd. in the District of New Jersey on December 6, 2016 (2:16-cv-09038-SRC-CLW) seeking declaratory judgment of infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,420,663, 8,524,276, 8,956,651, 9,180,125, and 9,314,461 based upon Actavis’s filing of an ANDA seeking to obtain approval to market a generic version of RELISTOR tablets before some or all of these patents expire.

 

Progenics, Salix, Bausch, and Wyeth filed suit against Actavis, Actavis LLC, Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., and Teva Pharmaceuticals Industries Ltd. in the District of New Jersey on December 8, 2017 (2:17-cv-12857-SRC-CLW) seeking declaratory judgment of infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 9,724,343 and 9,492,445 based upon Actavis’s filing of an ANDA seeking to obtain approval to market a generic version of RELISTOR tablets before some or all of these patents expire.

 

The 2:16-cv-09038-SRC-CLW and 2:17-cv-12857-SRC-CLW actions were consolidated into a single action in the District of New Jersey (2:16-cv-09038-SRC-CLW). A four day bench trial was held from May 6, 2019 through May 9, 2019. On July 17, 2019, the Court issued an Order finding the asserted claims of U.S. Patent No. 8,524,276 valid and infringed. The Court additionally ordered that the effective date of any approval of Actavis’s ANDA No. 209615 may not be earlier than the expiration date of U.S. Patent No. 8,524,276.

 

Progenics, Salix, Bausch, and Wyeth filed suit against Actavis, Actavis LLC, Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., and Teva Pharmaceuticals Industries Ltd. in the District of New Jersey on June 13, 2019 (2:19-cv-13722-SRC-CLW) seeking declaratory judgment of infringement of U.S. Patent No. 10,307,417 based upon Actavis’s filing of an ANDA seeking to obtain approval to market a generic version of RELISTOR tablets before this patent expires. Litigation in the 2:19-cv-13722-SRC-CLW action is underway. Fact discovery has not yet underway.begun.

Federal Circuit Appeal

Actavis filed an appeal of the District Court decision with the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit on August 13, 2019. The matter is currently pending on appeal at the Federal Circuit and merits briefing is underway. Actavis’s opening brief was filed February 6, 2020. The deadline for Plaintiffs to file their responsive brief is currently July 17, 2020.

European Opposition Proceedings

 

In addition to the above described ANDA notifications, in October 2015, Progenics received notices of opposition to three European patents relating to methylnaltrexone. Notices of opposition against EP1615646 were filed on September 24, 2015 separately by each of Actavis Group PTC ehf and Fresenius Kabi Deutschland GmbH. Notices of opposition against EP2368553 were filed on September 29, 2015 and September 30, 2015 by Fresenius Kabi Deutschland GmbH and Actavis Group PTC ehf, respectively. Notices of opposition against EP2368554 were filed on September 24, 2015 separately by each of Actavis Group PTC ehf and Fresenius Kabi Deutschland GmbH. On May 11, 2017, the opposition division provided notice that EP2368553 will be revoked. On June 28, 2017, the opposition division provided notice that EP1615646 will be revoked. On July 4, 2017, the opposition division provided notice that EP2368554 will be revoked. Each of these matters are on appeal with the European Patent Office. Oral proceedings for EP1615646 are set to occur on September 22, 2020. A dateOral proceedings for oralEP2368554 and EP2368553, scheduled for March 9 and March 10, 2020, respectively were cancelled by the Board of Appeals on March 9, 2020, due to health concerns. Oral proceedings has not yethave been set in the appeals concerning EP2368553rescheduled for November 18, 2020 for EP2368554 and EP2368554.for November 17, 2020 for EP2368553.

 

For each of the above-described proceedings, we and Bausch continue to cooperate closely to vigorously defend and enforce RELISTOR intellectual property rights. Pursuant to the RELISTOR license agreement between Progenics and Bausch, Bausch has the first right to enforce the intellectual property rights at issue and is responsible for the costs of such enforcement.

 

We are or may be from time to time involved in various other disputes, governmental and/or regulatory inspections, inquires, investigations and proceedings that could result in litigation, and other litigation matters that arise from time to time. The process of resolving matters through litigation or other means is inherently uncertain and it is possible that an unfavorable resolution of these matters will adversely affect us, our results of operations, financial condition, and cash flows.

PSMA-617

German District Court Litigation

 

We announced a lawsuit and associated worldwide patent ownership dispute based on our claims to certain inventions related to PSMA-617, a PSMA-targeted radiopharmaceutical compound under development for the treatment of prostate cancer that is the subject of certain European and U.S. Patent Applicationspatent applications filed worldwide by the University of Heidelberg (“the University”).

 

On November 8, 2018, MIP filed a complaint against the University in the District Court of Mannheim in Germany. In this Complaint, the Company claims that the discovery and development of PSMA-617 was related to work performed under a research collaboration sponsored by MIP. MIP alleged that the University breached certain contracts with MIP and that MIP is the co-owner of inventions embodied in certain worldwide patent filings related to PSMA-617 currently pending in Europe and the United States that were filed by the University in its own name. On February 27, 2019, Endocyte, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Novartis AG, filed a motion to intervene in the German litigation. Endocyte is the exclusive licensee of the patent rights that are the subject of the German proceedings.

 

On November 27, 2018, MIP requested that the European Patent Office (“EPO”) stay the examination of European Patent (EP) 3 038 9963038996 A1 (EP 14 799 340.6)14799340.6) and of the Divisional Applications EP 18 172 716.5, EP18 184 296.4,18172716.5, EP 18184296.4, and EP 18 203 547.718203547.7 pending a decision from the German District Court on MIP’s Complaint. On December 10, 2018, the EPO granted MIP’s request and stayed the examination of the patent and patent applications effective November 27, 2018. Likewise, onOn December 20, 2018, MIP filed a Confirmation of Ownership with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) in the corresponding US patent applications (US Serial Nos. 15/131,118; 15/805,900; 16/038,729 and 16/114988)114,988). MIP’s filing with the USPTO takes the position that, in light of the collaboration and contracts between MIP and the University, MIP is the co-owner of these pending U.S. patent applications. On November 12, 2019, the University filed a statement with the USPTO to dispute the Confirmation of Ownership filed by MIP. On February 21, 2020, MIP filed declarations confirming the assignment record as correct based upon MIP’s filings dated December 20, 2018, as well as a Confirmation of Ownership in pending US patent applications 16/551,198 and 16/510,495. On March 6, 2020, MIP filed with the USPTO a notice stating that the Power of Attorney in pending US patent applications 16/551,198 and 16/510,495 was signed by less than all applicants or owners of the applications.

 

On February 27, 2019, the German District Court entered two orders in the litigation. First, the Court set €416, 000€416,000 as the amount MIP must deposit with the Court as security in the event of an unfavorable final decision on the merits of the dispute. Second,On February 28, 2019, the Court set a hearing date of August 6, 2019 duringat which time it will consider the various arguments of the parties and determine the next steps of the litigation. On August 6, the District Court of Mannheim in Germany held the first oral hearing in the case. The Court considered procedural matters and granted the parties the right to make further submissions. MIP’s further submission was timely filed by the October 1, 2019 deadline. The University filed a reply brief on January 31, 2020 and MIP filed a further reply brief on April 8, 2020. The Court is in the process of scheduling a further oral hearing to be held in summer 2020.

Third Party Patents

Post-Grant Review of U.S. Patent No. 10,112,974

On July 29, 2019 we filed a petition for post-grant review (“PGR”) with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) of U.S. Patent No. 10,112,974 (“the ‘974 patent”), which is jointly owned by Max-Planck-Gesellschaft zur Foerderung der Wissenschaften and Universitat zu Koln (“the Patent Owners”). Certain claims of the ‘974 patent recite precursor compounds for preparing prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) targeting conjugates. In our petition, we allege that such precursor compounds were previously disclosed in other publications, and that claims 1-15 and 31 are therefore invalid.

On August 13, 2019, the USPTO mailed a Notice of Filing Date, setting a three (3)-month deadline for the Patent Owners to file a preliminary response. The Patent Owners did not file a response. On January 29, 2020, the Patent Trial & Appeal Board (PTAB) at the USPTO instituted post-grant review of the ‘974 patent, setting a deadline of April 22, 2020 for the Patent Owners to file a response. On March 13, 2020, the Patent Owners filed a statutory disclaimer, disclaiming claims 1-5, 7, 9, 13-15 and 31. On April 27, 2020, the USPTO issued a final written decision, stating remaining claims 6, 8, and 10-12 were not shown to be unpatentable.

Litigation Related to the Merger

Six lawsuits - four putative class actions and two individual actions - were initially brought against Progenics and the Progenics Board by purported stockholders of Progenics alleging inadequate disclosure by Progenics in the registration statement filed on November 12, 2019 related to the merger. Three of such lawsuits were voluntarily dismissed without prejudice by plaintiffs, with no settlements from, or other agreed obligations by, the respective defendants thereunder. Two additional putative class actions and an individual action were subsequently filed, alleging, among other things, inadequate disclosures in the amended registration statement filed on March 16, 2020 and the proxy statement filed on March 19, 2020.

On November 22, 2019, a purported stockholder filed a putative class action complaint in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, captioned Johnson v. Progenics Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 1:19-cv-02183, against Progenics and members of the Progenics Board, which is referred to in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q as the Johnson I Action. On March 5, 2020, the Johnson I Action was voluntarily dismissed without prejudice. On November 25, 2019, a second purported stockholder filed a putative class action complaint in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, captioned Thompson v. Progenics Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 1:19-cv-02194, against Progenics, certain members of the Progenics Board, Lantheus Holdings, and Plato Merger Sub, Inc. ("Merger Sub"), which is referred to in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q as the Thompson Action. On March 10, 2020, the Thompson Action was voluntarily dismissed without prejudice. On November 26, 2019, a third purported stockholder filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, captioned Wang v. Progenics Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 1:19-cv-10936, against Progenics and members of the Progenics Board, which is referred to in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q as the Wang Action. On December 9, 2019, a fourth purported stockholder filed a putative class action complaint in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, captioned Michael A. Bernstein IRA v. Progenics Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 2:19-cv-21200, against Progenics, members of the Progenics Board, Lantheus Holdings, and Merger Sub, which is referred to in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q as the Bernstein IRA Action. On April 21, 2020 an amended complaint was filed in the Bernstein IRA Action, and on May 6, 2020, the Bernstein IRA action was transferred to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York under Civil Action No. 1:20-cv-03521. On December 12, 2019, a fifth purported stockholder filed a putative class action complaint in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, captioned Pill v. Progenics Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 1:19-cv-02268, against Progenics and members of the Progenics Board. The purported stockholder voluntarily dismissed this action without prejudice and the court closed the case on March 10, 2020. On December 20, 2019, a sixth purported stockholder filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, captioned Hess v. Progenics Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 1:19-cv-11683, against Progenics, Progenics’ Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, and members of the Progenics Board, which is referred to in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q as the Hess Action. On April 8, 2020, an amended complaint was filed in the Hess Action.

On April 2, 2020, a seventh purported stockholder filed a putative class action in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, captioned Goldstone v. Progenics Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 1:20-cv-02750, against Progenics, members of the Progenics Board, Lantheus Holdings, and Merger Sub, which is referred to in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q as the Goldstone Action. On April 6, 2020, the purported stockholder in the Johnson Action filed a putative class action in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, captioned Johnson v. Progenics Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 1:20-cv-02847, against Progenics and members of the Progenics Board, which is referred to in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q as the Johnson II Action. On April 8, 2020, an eighth purported stockholder filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, captioned Krueger v. Progenics Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 1:20-cv-02913, against Progenics and members of the Progenics Board, which is referred to in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q as the Krueger Action.

The complaints in the Wang, Bernstein IRA, Hess, Goldstone, Johnson II, and Krueger Actions allege, among other things, that Progenics and the members of the Progenics Board violated Sections 14(a) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act, and 17 C.F.R. § 244.100 and Rule 14a-9 promulgated under the Exchange Act, by misstating or omitting certain allegedly material information in the registration statement filed with the SEC on November 12, 2019 related to the merger, the amended registration statement filed on March 16, 2020, or the proxy statement filed on March 19, 2020. The Goldstone complaint further alleges that members of the Board breached their fiduciary duties to the stockholders of Progenics and that Lantheus Holdings and Merger Sub aided and abetted such breaches of fiduciary duties. The complaints seek, among other things, injunctive relief preventing the consummation of the merger, rescission or damages in the event of consummation of the merger, declaratory relief related to disclosures in the registration statement, and certain fees and expenses. Progenics intends to vigorously defend itself against these complaints.

In addition, by letter dated October 14, 2019, Progenics received a shareholder demand from the Fireman’s Retirement System of St. Louis under Section 220 of the DGCL to inspect its books and records concerning, among other things, the opposition to the consent solicitation commenced by Velan and the negotiation and execution of the original merger agreement, and asserting that the Progenics Board may have breached its fiduciary obligations. Progenics and the Fireman’s Retirement System of St. Louis executed a confidentiality agreement and negotiated the scope of the production of books and records in response to the FRS Demand which Progenics has provided.

Whistleblower Complaint

In July 2019, we received notification of a complaint submitted by Dr. Syed Mahmood, the former Vice President of Medical Affairs for Progenics, to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration of the United States Department of Labor (“DOL”), alleging that the termination of his employment by Progenics was in violation of Section 806 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“SOX”). Dr. Mahmood is seeking reinstatement as Vice President of Medical Affairs, back pay, front pay in lieu of reinstatement, interest, attorneys’ fees and costs incurred, and special damages. In March 2020, Dr. Mahmood filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York (as permitted by SOX because the DOL had not issued a decision within 180 days). Dr. Mahmood’s federal complaint makes similar allegations as his DOL claim. The DOL action will now be dismissed and the action will proceed in federal district court. Progenics’ response in the federal action is due May 26, 2020. The Company believes that it had ample reason for terminating such employment for good and sufficient legal cause, and the Company believes that the claim is without merit and is vigorously defending this claim.

 

 

Note 9. Operating Leases

 

We lease office and manufacturing space and certain office equipment under noncancelable operating leases. We determine whether an arrangement is or contains a lease at its inception. We recognize lease liabilities based on the present value of the minimum lease payments not yet paid, by using the lease term and discount rate determined at lease commencement. As our leases do not provide an implicit rate, we use our incremental borrowing rate of 9.5% commensurate with the underlying lease terms to determine the present value of our lease payments. Rental payments are recognized as rent expense on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease and for the three and six months ended June 30,March 31, 2020 and 2019, we recognized rent expense in the amount of $0.6 million and $1.1$0.5 million, respectively. Our leases have remaining lease terms of one year to 11.310.5 years, one of which includes an option to extend the lease for five years. For both the three and six months ended June 30,March 31, 2020 and 2019, cash payments against operating lease liabilities totaled $0.5 million and $1.0 million, respectively.million.

 

The information related to our leases is as follows (in thousands):

 

 

June 30,

  

March 31,

  

December 31,

 

Operating leases

 

2019

  

2020

  

2019

 

Operating ROU lease assets, noncurrent

 $13,889  $13,279  $13,493 

Operating lease liabilities, current

  555   616   599 

Operating lease liabilities, noncurrent

  15,312   14,832   15,005 

 

At June 30, 2019,March 31, 2020, future lease payments for noncancelable operating leases are as follows (in thousands):

 

2019 (excluding the six months ending June 30, 2019)

 $1,002 

2020

  2,040 

2020 (excluding the three months ending March 31, 2020)

 $1,524 

2021

  2,077   2,069 

2022

  2,213   2,213 

2023

  2,255   2,255 

2024

  2,297 

Thereafter

  16,807   14,510 

Total future minimum lease payments

  26,394   24,868 

Less imputed interest

  (10,527)  (9,420)

Total lease liabilities

 $15,867  $15,448 

 

23

Table of Contents

 

Note 10. Non-Recourse Long-Term Debt, Net

 

On November 4, 2016, through a new wholly-owned subsidiary MNTX Royalties Sub LLC (“MNTX Royalties”), we entered into a $50.0 million loan agreement (the “Royalty-Backed Loan”) with a fund managed by HealthCare Royalty Partners III, L.P. (“HCRP”). Under the terms of the Royalty-Backed Loan, the lenders have no recourse to us or to any of our assets other than the right to receive royalty payments from the commercial sales of RELISTOR products owed under our agreement with Bausch. The RELISTOR royalty payments will be used to repay the principal and interest on the loan. The Royalty-Backed Loan bears interest at a per annum rate of 9.5%.

25

 

Under the terms of the loan agreement, payments of interest and principal, if any, are made on the last day of each calendar quarter out of RELISTOR royalty payments received since the immediately-preceding payment date. On each payment date prior to March 31, 2018, RELISTOR royalty payments received since the immediately preceding payment date were applied solely to the payment of interest on the loan, with any royalties in excess of the interest amount retained by us. Beginning on March 31, 2018, 50% of RELISTOR royalty payments received since the immediately-preceding payment date in excess of accrued interest on the loan are used to repay the principal of the loan, with the balance retained by us. Starting on September 30, 2021, all of the RELISTOR royalties received since the immediately-preceding payment date will be used to repay the interest and outstanding principal balance until the balance is fully repaid. The loan has a maturity date of June 30, 2025. Upon the occurrence of certain triggers in the loan agreement and if HCRP so elects, all of the RELISTOR royalty payments received after the immediately-preceding payment date shall be applied to the payment of interest and repayment of principal until the principal of the loan is fully repaid. In the event of such an election by HCRP, we have the right to repay the loan without any prepayment penalty.

 

In connection with the Royalty-Backed Loan, the debt issuance costs have been recorded as a debt discount in our consolidated balance sheets and are being amortized and recorded as interest expense throughout the life of the loan using the effective interest method.

 

The following tables summarize the components of the Royalty-Backed Loan in our condensed consolidated financial statements for the periods presented (in thousands):

 

 

June 30,

  

December 31,

  

March 31,

  

December 31,

 

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

 

2019

  

2018

  

2020

  

2019

 

Outstanding principal balance, current portion

 $6,057  $5,688  $7,456  $7,349 

Unamortized debt discount, current portion

  (251)  (269)  (216)  (232)

Current portion of debt, net

 $5,806  $5,419  $7,240  $7,117 
                

Outstanding principal balance, long-term portion

 $36,715  $39,674  $30,381  $32,170 

Unamortized debt discount, long-term portion

  (373)  (494)  (215)  (260)

Long-term debt, net

 $36,342  $39,180  $30,166  $31,910 

 

 

Three Months Ended

  

Six Months Ended

  

Three Months Ended

 
 

June 30,

  

June 30,

  

March 31,

 

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations

 

2019

  

2018

  

2019

  

2018

  

2020

  

2019

 

Interest expense

 $1,053  $1,176  $2,130  $2,381  $939  $1,077 

Non-cash interest expense

  69   74   140   137   61   71 

Total interest expense included in interest (expense) income, net

 $1,122  $1,250  $2,270  $2,518  $1,000  $1,148 

 

As of June 30, 2019,March 31, 2020, we were in compliance with all material covenants under the Royalty-Backed Loan and there was no material adverse change in our business, operations, or financial conditions, as defined in the loan agreement.

 

 

Note 11. Stockholders Equity

 

Common Stock and Preferred Stock

 

We are authorized to issue 160.0 million shares of our common stock, par value $0.0013, and 20.0 million shares of preferred stock, par value $0.001. The Board of Directors (the “Board”) has the authority to issue common and preferred shares, in series, with rights and privileges as determined by the Board.

 

24

Shelf Registration 

During the first quarter of 2017, we filed a shelf registration statement that permitted: (a) the offering, issuance and sale of up to a maximum aggregate offering price of $250.0 million of our common stock, preferred stock, debt securities, warrants, rights and/or units; and (b) as part of the $250.0 million, the offering, issuance and sale by us of up to a maximum aggregate offering price of $75.0 million of our common stock under our sales agreement with Cantor Fitzgerald & Co. (“Cantor”) in one or more at-the-market (“ATM”) offerings (the “2017 Sales Agreement”).

 

In October 2018, we filed a new shelf registration statement. The new shelf registration replaced our prior shelf registration statement, pursuant to which no additional securities will be offered or sold. The new shelf registration statement permits: (a) the offering, issuance and sale of up to a maximum aggregate offering price of $250.0 million of our common stock, preferred stock, debt securities, warrants, rights and/or units; and (b) as part of the $250.0 million, the offering, issuance and sale by us of up to a maximum aggregate offering price of $75.0 million of our common stock under our sales agreement with Cantor in one or more ATMat-the-market (“ATM”) offerings.

26

 

In addition, in October 2018 we entered into a new sales agreement with Cantor Fitzgerald & Co. (“Cantor”), as sales agent, which replaced the 2017 Sales Agreement (the “2018 Sales Agreement”). Pursuant to the 2018 Sales Agreement, we may offer and sell through Cantor, from time to time, shares of our common stock up to an aggregate offering price of $75.0 million. The 2018 Sales Agreement may be terminated by Cantor or us at any time upon ten days’ notice, or by Cantor at any time in certain circumstances, including the occurrence of a material adverse change in our business or financial condition.

 

 

Note 12. Stock-Based Compensation

 

Equity Incentive Plans

 

We adopted the following stockholder-approved equity incentive plans:

 

●     The 2005 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2005 Plan”), which authorized the issuance of up to 11,450,000 shares of common stock covering several different types of awards, including stock options, restricted shares, stock appreciation rights, performance shares, and phantom stock. The 2005 Plan was terminated in June 2018 at the time the 2018 Stock Incentive Plan was approved. Shares available for new awards under the 2005 Plan at the time of termination became available for awards under the 2018 Stock Incentive Plan. Options granted before termination of the 2005 Plan will continue to remain outstanding until exercised, cancelled or expired.

 

●     The 2018 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2018 Plan”), pursuant to which we are authorized to issue up to 4,800,000 shares of common stock covering several different types of awards, including stock options, restricted shares, stock appreciation rights, performance shares, and phantom stock. The 2018 Plan will terminate on March 27, 2028.

 

The stock option plans provide that options may be granted at an exercise price of 100% of fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant, may be exercised in full or in installments, at the discretion of the Board or its Compensation Committee, and must be exercised within ten years from date of grant. Stock options generally vest pro rata over three to five years. We recognize stock-based compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service (vesting) period based on fair values. We use historical data to estimate expected employee behaviors related to option exercises and forfeitures and included these expected forfeitures as a part of the estimate of stock-based compensation expense as of the grant date. We adjust the total amount of stock-based compensation expense recognized for each award, in the period in which each award vests, to reflect the actual forfeitures related to that award. Changes in our estimated forfeiture rate will result in changes in the rate at which compensation cost for an award is recognized over its vesting period.

 

25

Stock Options

 

The following table summarizes stock options activity for the sixthree months ended June 30, 2019March 31, 2020 (in thousands, except per share data or as otherwise noted):

 

          

Weighted

 
      

Weighted

  

Average

 
  

Number

  

Average

  

Remaining

 
  

of Shares

  

Exercise Price

  

Contractual Life

 

Outstanding at January 1, 2019

  6,264  $6.79   6.02 

Granted

  1,392  $4.52     

Cancelled

  (230) $7.17     

Exercised

  (225) $5.33     

Expired

  (27) $7.79     

Outstanding at June 30, 2019

  7,174  $6.38   6.44 

Exercisable at June 30, 2019

  4,647  $6.63   5.03 

Vested and expected to vest at June 30, 2019

  6,519  $6.46   6.17 
          

Weighted

 
      

Weighted

  

Average

 
  

Number

  

Average

  

Remaining

 
  

of Shares

  

Exercise Price

  

Contractual Life

 

Outstanding at January 1, 2020

  6,940  $6.35   6.09 

Granted

  1,233  $4.77     

Cancelled

  (1,486) $6.54     

Exercised

  (36) $4.52     

Outstanding at March 31, 2020

  6,651  $6.03   7.03 

Exercisable at March 31, 2020

  4,136  $6.61   5.65 

Vested and expected to vest at March 31, 2020

  5,822  $6.17   6.69 

 

The weighted-average fair value of options granted during the three and six months ended June 30,March 31, 2020 and 2019 was $2.37$2.65 and $2.86 per share, respectively and during the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 was $6.12 and $4.58$2.87 per share, respectively.

 

The total intrinsic value (the excess of the market price over the exercise price) was approximately $5.1 millionzero for stock options outstanding, $2.7 million for stock options exercisable, and $4.4 million for stock options vested and expected to vest as of June 30, 2019.March 31, 2020. The total intrinsic value for stock options exercised during the three months ended March 31, 2020 was approximately $6 thousand. No stock options were exercised during the sixthree months ended June 30, 2018.March 31, 2019.

27

 

Stock-Based Compensation Expense

 

We account for stock-based awards issued to employees in accordance with the provisions of ASC 718 (Topic 718, Compensation – Stock Compensation). We recognize stock-based compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the service period of the award, which is generally three to five years. Stock-based awards issued to consultants are accounted for in accordance with the provisions of ASC 718 and ASC 505-50 (Subtopic 50 “Equity-Based Payments to Non-Employees” of Topic 505, Equity). Options granted to consultants are periodically revalued as the options vest and are recognized as an expense over the related period of service or the vesting period, whichever is longer. Under the provisions of ASC 718, members of the Board are considered employees for calculation of stock-based compensation expense.

 

We estimated the fair value of the stock options granted on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes valuation model that used the weighted-average assumptions noted in the following table. The risk-free interest rate assumption we use is based upon United States Treasury interest rates appropriate for the expected life of the awards. The expected life (estimated period of time that we expect employees, directors, and consultants to hold their stock options) was estimated based on historical rates for three group classifications, (i) employees, (ii) outside directors and officers, and (iii) consultants. Expected volatility was based on historical volatility of our stock price for a period equal to the stock option’s expected life and calculated on a daily basis. The expected dividend rate is zero since we do not currently pay cash dividends on our common stock and do not anticipate doing so in the foreseeable future.

 

The following table presents assumptions used in computing the fair value of option grants during the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019.

 

Three Months Ended

  

Six Months Ended

  

Three Months Ended

 
 

June 30,

  

June 30,

  

March 31,

 
 

2019

  

2018

  

2019

  

2018

  

2020

  

2019

 

Risk-free interest rate

  2.04%  2.91%  2.61%  2.71%  0.94%   2.62% 

Expected life (in years)

  5.27   7.15   6.52   6.72   6.07   6.54 

Expected volatility

  60%  70%  66%  69%  61%   66% 

Expected dividend yield

  --   --   --   --   --   -- 

 

Stock-based compensation expense for the three and six months ended June 30,March 31, 2020 and 2019 and 2018 was recorded in our condensed consolidated statement of operations as follows (in thousands):

 

 

Three Months Ended

  

Six Months Ended

  

Three Months Ended

 
 

June 30,

  

June 30,

  

March 31,

 
 

2019

  

2018

  

2019

  

2018

  

2020

  

2019

 

Research and development expenses

 $387  $452  $837  $977  $487  $450 

Selling, general and administrative expenses

  607   1,678   1,234   2,201   391   627 

Total stock-based compensation expense

 $994  $2,130  $2,071  $3,178  $878  $1,077 

 

At June 30, 2019,March 31, 2020, unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to stock options was approximately $5.9$4.8 million and is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately 2.22.8 years.

 

26
28

 

Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

 

The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“(���MD&A”) is intended to assist the reader in understanding the business of Progenics Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the “Company”, “Progenics”, “we”, or “us”). MD&A is provided as a supplement to, and should be read in conjunction with, our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018.2019. Our results of operations discussed in MD&A are presented in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. (“GAAP”). We operate under a single research and development business segment. Therefore, our results of operations are discussed on a consolidated basis.

 

Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

 

This document and other public statements we make may contain statements that do not relate strictly to historical fact, any of which may be forward-looking statements within the meaning of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Statements contained in this communication that refer to our estimated or anticipated future results or other non-historical facts are forward-looking statements that reflect our current perception of existing trends and information as of the date of this communication. Forward looking statements generally will be accompanied by words such as anticipate, believe, plan, could, should, estimate, expect”, forecast, outlook, guidance, intend, may, might, will, possible, potential, predict, project, or other similar words, phrases or expressions. In evaluating such statements, we urge you to specifically consider the various risk factors identified under Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors” included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018,2019, as updated by our subsequent Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, which could cause actual events or results to differ materially from those indicated by forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties which may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from those expressed or implied by such statements.While it is impossible to identify or predict all such matters, these differences between forward-looking statements and our actual results, performance or achievement may result from, among other things; risks associated with the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic and the measures taken to prevent its spread and the related impact on our business; the proposed merger with Lantheus Holdings; the unpredictability of the duration and results of regulatory review of New Drug Applications (“NDA”) and Investigational NDA; the inherent uncertainty of the timing and success of, and expense associated with, research, development, regulatory approval and commercialization of our products and product candidates, including the risks that clinical trials will not commence or proceed as planned; products which appear to be promising in early trials will not demonstrate efficacy or safety in larger-scale trials; clinical trial data on our products and product candidates will be unfavorable; our products will not receive marketing approval from regulators or, if approved, do not gain sufficient market acceptance to justify development and commercialization costs; the sales of RELISTOR® and other products by our partners and the revenue and income generated for us thereby may not meet expectations; our commercial launch of AZEDRA® may not meet revenue and income expectations; competing products currently on the market or in development might reduce the commercial potential of our products; we, our collaborators or others might identify side effects after the product is on the market; efficacy or safety concerns regarding marketed products, whether or not originating from subsequent testing or other activities by us, governmental regulators, other entities or organizations or otherwise, and whether or not scientifically justified, may lead to product recalls, withdrawals of marketing approval, reformulation of the product, additional pre-clinical testing or clinical trials, changes in labeling of the product, the need for additional marketing applications, declining sales, or other adverse events; and the inherent uncertainty of outcomes in intellectual property disputes such as the dispute with University of Heidelberg regarding PSMA-617; the costs and management distraction attendant to activist stockholder campaigns; and risks related to changes in the composition of our Board of Directors following our most recent annual meeting of stockholdersPSMA-617.

 

We are also subject to risks and uncertainties associated with the actions of our corporate, academic and other collaborators and government regulatory agencies, including risks from market forces and trends; potential product liability; intellectual property, litigation and other dispute resolution, environmental and other risks; a potential inability to obtain sufficient capital, recruit and retain employees, enter into favorable collaborations, transactions, or other relationships, or the risk that existing or future relationships or transactions may not proceed as planned; the potential for cybersecurity breaches of our systems and information technology; the risk that current and pending patent protection for our products may be invalid, unenforceable or challenged, or fail to provide adequate market exclusivity, or that our rights to in-licensed intellectual property may be terminated for our failure to satisfy performance milestones; the risk of difficulties in, and regulatory compliance relating to, manufacturing products; and the uncertainty of our future profitability.

 

Risks and uncertainties to which we are subject also include general economic conditions, including interest and currency exchange-rate fluctuations and the availability of capital; changes in generally accepted accounting principles; the impact of legislation and regulatory compliance; the highly regulated nature of our business, including government cost-containment initiatives and restrictions on third-party payments for our products; trade buying patterns; the competitive climate of our industry; and other factors set forth in this document and other reports filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). In particular, we cannot assure you that AZEDRA®or RELISTOR® will be commercially successful or be approved in the future in other indications or jurisdictions, or that any of our other programs will result in a commercial product.products.

 

27

Table of Contents

We do not have a policy of updating or revising forward-looking statements and, except as expressly required by law, we disclaim any intent or obligation to update or revise any statements as a result of new information or future events or developments. It should not be assumed that our silence over time means that actual events are bearing out as expressed or implied in forward-looking statements.

 

29

Overview

 

Business

 

We are an oncology company focused on the development and commercialization of innovative targeted medicines and artificial intelligence to find, fight and follow cancer. Highlights of our recent progress include the first commercial revenue for AZEDRA, completion of enrollment of the PyL pivotal Phase 3 trial, and dosing of the first patient in the 1095 open label Phase 2 trial. Our pipeline includes therapeutic agents designed to precisely target cancer (AZEDRA, 1095 and PSMA TTC), as well as a prostate-specific membrane antigen (“PSMA”) targeted imaging agents for prostate cancer (PyL and 1404).

 

Our business strategy requires us to manage our business to provide for the continued development, manufacturing and potential commercialization of our proprietary and partnered product candidates. This includes identifying and advancing aour pipeline of product candidates by identifying product candidates, technologies and businesses for acquisition and in-licensing that we believe are a strategic fit with our existing business.

Our strategy also calls for us to undertake increased research and development activities and to manage an increasing number of relationships with partners and other third parties, while simultaneously managing the capital necessary to support this strategy. An element of our research

COVID-19 Trends and development strategy has been to in-license technology and product candidates.Uncertainties

 

We may consider opportunitieshave taken steps in response to out-license our development and clinical programs or to in-license or acquire additional oncology compounds and/or programs. We may also consider other strategic transactions from time to time that are consistent withthe impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our business strategy and objectives.to protect the health and safety of our employees.

With respect to AZEDRA, our first quarter sales totaled approximately $1.4 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2020. Sales of therapeutic doses of AZEDRA doubled over the preceding quarter. Progenics is continuing to receive and process requests for both dosimetry and therapeutic doses. However, in alignment with government, regulatory and public health recommendations in relation to the COVID-19 pandemic, many of the multidisciplinary treatment centers that serve pheochromocytoma or paraganglioma patients have banned, or have limited access to external visitors, including the field-based sales team for AZEDRA, to ensure the safety of patients and healthcare providers. Consequently, the Company expects corresponding product revenue to reflect the challenging environment associated with the COVID-19 pandemic until restrictions are lifted.

Additionally, as the clinical community is facing challenges in trial conduct due to the COVID-19 pandemic, we are committed to ensuring adequate safety monitoring of the ARROW Phase 2 study in mCRPC subjects and maintaining the integrity of the trial in alignment with government, regulatory and public health recommendations. As such, Progenics has paused new enrollment for several months in the Phase 2 trial of I-131-1095 (“1095”) in combination with enzalutamide in chemotherapy-naïve patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) to minimize the risk to patients and healthcare providers during the pandemic. For patients who are active and have been randomized for the study, they will continue to receive treatment doses and will be monitored for safety and efficacy in a manner that is permissible by each clinical site.

As a result, the Company has decided to curtail promotional spending and furlough a portion of the clinical, commercial and medical employees to support cost-saving measures as the Company continues to navigate through the changing COVID-19 environment. Progenics continues to assess this emerging situation and will make any relevant adjustments in alignment with government mandates when necessary.

We have not experienced any disruptions in our preparations to file a New Drug Application (“NDA”) for PyL with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”). We are currently targeting completion of the submission early in the third quarter of 2020.

30

We are closely monitoring the impact of COVID-19 on all aspects of our business. The extent to which the COVID-19 pandemic impacts our business, our business partners, results of operations, and financial condition will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain and difficult to predict; these developments include, but are not limited to, the duration and spread of the outbreak, the severity of its effects, the actions to contain the virus or address its impact, U.S. and foreign government actions to respond to the reduction in global economic activity, and how quickly and to what extent normal economic and operating conditions can resume. Even after the COVID-19 outbreak has subsided, we may continue to experience materially adverse impacts on our financial condition and results of operations. For more information on the risks associated with COVID-19, see Part II, Item 1A, "Risk Factors" herein.

Pending Merger with Lantheus Holdings

On February 20, 2020, we announced the signing of the Merger Agreement with Lantheus Holdings. The Merger Agreement reflects the renegotiation of certain of the terms of our original agreement for the proposed merger entered into on October 1, 2019. The combined company would be led by Lantheus Holdings’ Chief Executive Officer, Mary Anne Heino. Ms. Heino will be supported by Chief Financial Officer, Robert J. Marshall Jr., and Chief Operations Officer, John Bolla. The Merger Agreement provides that, following the closing, Dr. Gérard Ber and Mr. Heinz Mäusli, currently members of our Board, will be added as members of the Board of Directors of Lantheus Holdings. At the effective time of the proposed merger, each share of Progenics common stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to such time (other than excluded shares and dissenting shares) will be converted into the right to receive (i) 0.31 of a share of Lantheus Holdings common stock (an increase from 0.2502 under the original agreement) and (ii) one non-transferrable CVR per share of Progenics common stock, which will represent the right to receive up to two contingent payments upon the achievement of certain milestones subject to the terms of the Contingent Value Rights Agreement to be entered into between Lantheus Holdings and a rights agent reasonable acceptable to Progenics at or immediately prior to the effective time of the proposed merger. In no event will Lantheus Holdings’ aggregate payments in respect of the CVRs, together with any other non-stock consideration treated as paid in connection with the proposed merger, exceed 19.9% of the total consideration Lantheus Holdings pays in the proposed merger. As a result of the increase in the exchange ratio, following the completion of the proposed merger, former Progenics stockholders’ aggregate ownership stake will increase to approximately 40% of the combined company from approximately 35% under the terms set forth in the original agreement.

On April 2, 2020, Progenics and Lantheus Holdings announced their decision to reschedule their respective special meetings of stockholders to vote on the matters related to the proposed merger of Progenics and Lantheus Holdings from April 28, 2020 to June 16, 2020. The rescheduling of the special meetings is intended to allow both companies the time necessary to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic and its effect on each company’s business and on the combined entity. The transaction is expected to close in the second quarter of 2020, subject to approval by Lantheus Holdings and Progenics stockholders and certain other customary closing conditions.

On April 14, 2020, Progenics entered into an agreement with the Velan Stockholders, pursuant to which Progenics agreed to pay the Velan Stockholders $1.3 million as partial reimbursement for their expenses incurred in connection with the Velan Stockholders’ involvement with Progenics, including the successful consent solicitation commenced on September 18, 2019 to reconstitute the board of directors of Progenics. The reimbursement will be in full satisfaction of the Velan Stockholders’ claims with respect to such expenses and will be paid promptly following the adoption of the Merger Agreement by the stockholders of Progenics and the approval of the stock issuance pursuant to the Merger Agreement by the stockholders of Lantheus Holdings.

In addition, on April 14, 2020, Progenics and Lantheus Holdings announced the entry by Lantheus Holdings into the Support Agreement with Velan in connection with the proposed merger of Progenics and Lantheus Holdings, providing that Velan will vote all of its Progenics common stock and Lantheus Holdings common stock in favor of the proposed merger of Lantheus Holdings and Progenics on the terms set forth in the Merger Agreement, and that Velan will abide by certain customary standstill provisions, in each case, subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the Support Agreement.

Corporate Updates

On February 28, 2020, Patrick Fabbio provided notice to the Board of his intention to resign as Progenics’ Chief Financial Officer, effective March 27, 2020. Mr. Fabbio agreed to continue providing services to Progenics as a consultant following the effective date of his resignation until the earlier of the anticipated closing of Progenics’ proposed merger with Lantheus Holdings or May 15, 2020. We entered into a consulting services agreement with Patrick Fabbio on March 4, 2020, with a term commencing on March 27, 2020 and continuing until the earlier of the effective date of the proposed merger with Lantheus Holdings or May 15, 2020 unless terminated by either party as set forth therein (the “Consulting Agreement”). Under the Consulting Agreement, Mr. Fabbio will provide consulting services as requested by us. In consideration for Mr. Fabbio’s services, the Consulting Agreement provides that, if the proposed merger is consummated on or before July 1, 2020, Mr. Fabbio will be paid $180,000 upon consummation of the proposed merger. This payment was originally provided for in his retention agreement with Progenics, except that such payment will now be made in a single lump sum upon the closing of the proposed merger with Lantheus Holdings and will not be contingent on Mr. Fabbio’s continued service with Progenics after the closing of the proposed merger.

31

On March 27, 2020, the Board appointed David W. Mims as Interim Chief Financial Officer of Progenics. Mr. Mims will continue to serve as Interim Chief Executive Officer of Progenics, which position he has held since November 2019.

Bridge Loan Agreement

On March 15, 2020, Progenics, as borrower, and Lantheus Medical Imaging, as lender, entered into the Bridge Loan Agreement, pursuant to which Lantheus Medical Imaging agreed to provide for a secured short-term loan to the Company on or after May 1, 2020 in an aggregate principal amount of up to $10 million. The bridge loan matures on the earlier to occur of (a) September 30, 2020 and (b) the date on which the Company enters into a debt financing or similar arrangements or any amendment to, or replacement of, its existing debt, provided by one or more third parties following the termination date of the Merger Agreement, in either case, having aggregate net cash proceeds that exceed the amount then required to repay all obligations under the Bridge Loan Agreement in full in cash. The bridge loan bears interest at a rate per annum of 9.5% and is secured through the pledge to Lantheus Medical Imaging of all of the issued and outstanding shares of capital stock of MIP, and any debt of MIP owed to Progenics. Progenics will use the proceeds of the bridge loan for working capital and other general corporate purposes.

Product Pipeline

 

Product / Candidate

Description

Status

Market

Rights

Ultra-Orphan Theranostic

 

 

 

 

AZEDRA (iobenguane I 131) 
555 MBq/mL injection

Unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic pheochromocytoma or paraganglioma 

Approved

U.S

Progenics

Prostate Cancer Theranostics

 

 

 

 

PyL (18F-DCFPyL)

PSMA-targeted PET/CT imaging agent for prostate cancer

Enrollment Completed
inPositive Phase 3 topline results

Worldwide
(ex. EU, AU, & NZ)

Progenics

PyL (18F-DCFPyL)

PSMA-targeted PET/CT imaging agent for prostate cancer

MeetingDiscussions with EMA

Europe

Curium

1095 (I 131 1095)

PSMA-targeted small molecule therapeutic for treatment of metastatic prostate cancer

Phase 2

Worldwide

Progenics

PSMA TTC (BAY 2315497)

PSMA-targeted antibody conjugate therapeutic for treatment of metastatic prostate cancer

Phase 1

Worldwide

Bayer

1404

Technetium-99m PSMA-targeted SPECT/CT imaging agent for prostate cancer

MeetingDiscussions with EMA

Europe

ROTOP

Digital Technology

 

 

 

 

PSMA AI

Imaging analysis technology that uses artificial intelligence and machine learning to quantify and automate the reading of PSMA targeted imaging

Investigational Use Only

Worldwide

Progenics

Automated Bone Scan Index (aBSI)

Automated reading and quantification of bone scans of prostate cancer patients using artificial intelligence and deep learning

CE marked (EU countries)
510(k) cleared in the U.S.

Worldwide (ex. Japan)

Progenics

Automated Bone Scan Index (BONENAVI)

Automated reading and quantification of bone scans of prostate cancer patients using artificial intelligence and deep learning

Approved in the U.S. and E.U.  510(k) cleared in the U.S. CE marked (E.U. countries)

Worldwide (ex. Japan)

Progenics

Automated Bone Scan Index (BONENAVI)

Automated reading and quantification of bone scans of prostate cancer patients using artificial intelligence and deep learning

Approved

Japan

FUJIFILM

Other Programs

 

 

 

 

RELISTOR Subcutaneous Injection
(methylnaltrexone bromide)

OIC in adults with chronic non-cancer pain or advanced-illness adult patients

Approved

Worldwide

Bausch

RELISTOR Tablets   
(methylnaltrexone bromide)

OIC in adults with chronic non-cancer pain

Approved

U.S.

Bausch

Leronlimab (PRO 140)

HIV Infection

Rolling BLA SubmissionSubmitted to FDA

U.S.

CytoDyn

 

28

Table of Contents

Ultra-Orphan Theranostic: 

 

AZEDRA

AZEDRA® (iobenguane I 131) is a radiotherapeutic, approved for the treatment of adult and pediatric patients 12 years and older with iobenguane scan positive, unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic pheochromocytoma or paraganglioma who require systemic anticancer therapy. AZEDRA is the first and only FDA-approved therapy for this indication.

Updated long-term follow up efficacy and safety data from the pivotal Phase 2 study of AZEDRA in patients with pheochromocytoma or paraganglioma were published as an abstract in the Journal of Urology in April 2020. Results as of October 10, 2019, demonstrated a median overall survival (OS) time of 43.2 months (95% CI 31.4, >60), as well as a median survival time of 19.3 months (95% CI 4.5, 32.4) and 49.1 months (95% CI 36.9, >60) in patients receiving one and two doses, respectively.

AZEDRA® (iobenguane I 131) is a radiotherapeutic, approved for the treatment of adult and pediatric patients 12 years and older with iobenguane scan positive, unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic pheochromocytoma or paraganglioma who require systemic anticancer therapy. AZEDRA is the first and only FDA-approved therapy for this indication. We anticipate opportunities for growth of AZEDRA beyond its existing label through the development of new indications.

 

Prostate Cancer Theranostics:

 

PyL

PyL (also known as 18F-DCFPyL) is a fluorinated PSMA-targeted PET imaging agent that enables visualization of both bone and soft tissue metastases to determine the presence or absence of recurrent and/or metastatic prostate cancer. In the U.S. and Canada, we completed enrollment of the pivotal Phase 3 trial evaluating the diagnostic performance and clinical impact of PyL in men with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer. Curium has licensed exclusive rights to develop and commercialize PyL in Europe.

1095(also known as I-131-1095) is a PSMA-targeted Iodine-131 labeled small molecule that is designed to deliver a dose of beta radiation directly to prostate cancer cells with minimal impact on the surrounding healthy tissues. We are conducting a Phase 2 clinical trial in combination with enzalutamide in chemotherapy-naïve patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).

PSMA TTC is a thorium-227 labeled PSMA-targeted antibody therapeutic. PSMA TTC is designed to deliver a dose of alpha radiation directly to prostate cancer cells with minimal impact on the surrounding healthy tissues. Bayer AG (“Bayer”) has exclusive worldwide rights to develop and commercialize products using our PSMA antibody technology in combination with Bayer’s alpha-emitting radionuclides. Bayer is developing PSMA TTC, a thorium-227 labeled PSMA-targeted antibody therapeutic. Bayer is conducting a Phase 1 trial of PSMA TTC in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

1404 is a technetium-99m labeled small molecule which binds to PSMA and is used as 18F-DCFPyL) is a fluorinated PSMA-targeted PET imaging agent that enables visualization of both bone and soft tissue metastases, with potential high clinical utility in the detection of recurrent and/or metastatic prostate cancer, as well as staging of high risk disease. We announced positive topline data in the pivotal Phase 3 trial evaluating the diagnostic performance and clinical impact of PyL in men with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer. 

We completed two successful pre-NDA meetings with the FDA in February 2020 and remain on track to complete a submission early in the third quarter of 2020. Based on prior discussions with the FDA, we believe that the data from the CONDOR study and the OSPREY study can serve as a basis for an NDA for PyL.

Several abstracts pertaining to PyL were published in the Journal of Urology in April 2020, including the results of the Phase 3 CONDOR study in patients with biochemical recurrent prostate cancer. The CONDOR trial achieved its primary endpoint, with a correct localization rate (CLR) of 84.8% to 87.0% among the three blinded independent readers (the lower bound of the 95% confidence intervals ranging from 77.8% to 80.4%). The results of additional investigator-sponsored studies of PyL conducted in post-prostatectomy patients and metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma were also published in the journal.

Curium has licensed exclusive rights to develop and commercialize PyL in Europe. Under the terms of the collaboration, Curium is responsible for the development, regulatory approvals and commercialization of PyL in Europe, and Progenics is entitled to royalties on net sales of PyL. Curium is in discussions with European Medicines Agency (“EMA”) regarding the development path in Europe.

1095

1095 (also known as I-131-1095) is a PSMA-targeted iodine-131 labeled small molecule that is designed to deliver a dose of beta radiation directly to prostate cancer cells with minimal impact on the surrounding healthy tissues. Following the removal of the import alert on Centre for Probe Development & Commercialization (CPDC), we have initiated eleven clinical sites in the U.S along with the six active sites in Canada to support enrollment in the Company’s multicenter, randomized, controlled, ARROW Phase 2 study in mCRPC.

PSMA TTC

PSMA TTC is a thorium-227 labeled PSMA-targeted antibody therapeutic. PSMA TTC is designed to deliver a dose of alpha radiation directly to prostate cancer cells with minimal impact on the surrounding healthy tissues. Bayer AG (“Bayer”) has exclusive worldwide rights to develop and commercialize products using our PSMA antibody technology in combination with Bayer’s alpha-emitting radionuclides. Bayer is conducting a Phase 1 trial of PSMA TTC in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

1404

1404 is a technetium-99m labeled small molecule which binds to PSMA and is used as a SPECT/CT imaging agent to diagnose and detect localized prostate cancer as well as soft tissue and bone metastases. ROTOP Pharmaka GmbH (“ROTOP”), a Germany-based developer of radiopharmaceuticals for nuclear medicine diagnostics, has exclusive rights to develop, manufacture and commercialize 1404 in Europe.

 

Digital Technology:

 

PSMA AI

PSMA AI is an imaging analysis technology that uses artificial intelligence and machine learning to quantify and automate the reading of PSMA-targeted imaging. We recently completed a performance study of our automated segmentation algorithms with PyL/CT images from our PyL research access initiative. The study demonstrated the efficiency and effectiveness of our fully automated segmentation algorithm of the 49 bones and 12 soft tissue regions of the whole body from PyL-PSMA PET/CT images. The deep learning algorithms demonstrated a Sørensen–Dice score of 0.90 or higher in segmenting anatomical structures in the low dose CT portion of a PyL PET/CT. This work provides automated generation of lesion quantification, localization and staging, therefore leading to highly contextualized assessments of disease burden.

Automated Bone Scan Index

Automated Bone Scan Index (“aBSI”) calculates the disease burden of prostate cancer by quantifying the hotspots on bone scans and automatically calculating the bone scan index value, representing the disease burden of prostate cancer shown on the bone scan. This quantifiable and reproducible calculation of the bone scan index value is intended to aid in the diagnosis and treatment of men with prostate cancer and may have utility in monitoring the course of the disease. The Japanese rights to the stand-alone aBSI have been transferred and sold to FUJIFILM Toyama Chemical Co. Ltd. (“FUJIFILM”) under the name BONENAVI®. The cloud based aBSI was cleared by the FDA for clinical use in the U.S. on August 5, 2019. In February 2020, the Company received CE marking for the standalone workstation model of aBSI, meeting the quality standards set by the European Economic Area.

PSMA AI is an imaging analysis technology that uses artificial intelligence and machine learning to quantify and automate the reading of PSMA-targeted imaging. We recently completed a performance study of our automated segmentation algorithms with PyL/CT images from our PyL research access initiative. The results from this analysis will be presented at an upcoming scientific conference.

Automated Bone Scan Index (aBSI) calculates the disease burden of prostate cancer by quantifying the hotspots on bone scans and automatically calculating the bone scan index value, representing the disease burden of prostate cancer shown on the bone scan. This quantifiable and reproducible calculation of the bone scan index value is intended to aid in the diagnosis and treatment of men with prostate cancer and may have utility in monitoring the course of the disease. The Japanese rights to aBSI have been transferred and sold to FUJIFILM Toyama Chemical Co, Ltd. (“FUJIFILM”) under the name BONENAVI®. The cloud based aBSI 510(k) was cleared by the FDA for clinical use in the U.S. on August 5, 2019.

 

Other Programs: 

 

RELISTOR

RELISTOR® (methylnaltrexone bromide) is a treatment for opioid-induced constipation (“OIC”) that addresses its underlying mechanism of OIC and decreases the constipating side effects induced by opioid pain medications such as morphine and codeine without diminishing their ability to relieve pain. RELISTOR is approved in two forms: a subcutaneous injection (12 mg and 8 mg) and an oral tablet (450 mg once daily). Any references herein to RELISTOR do not imply that any other form or possible use of the drug has received approval. RELISTOR subcutaneous injection is being sold in the U.S., E.U., and Canada, and RELISTOR tablets are being sold in the U.S. RELISTOR’s approved U.S. label and full U.S. prescribing information is available at www.RELISTOR.com. Other approved labels for RELISTOR apply in markets outside of the United States.

RELISTOR® is a treatment for opioid-induced constipation (“OIC”) that addresses its underlying mechanism of OIC and decreases the constipating side effects induced by opioid pain medications such as morphine and codeine without diminishing their ability to relieve pain. RELISTOR is approved in two forms: a subcutaneous injection (12 mg and 8 mg) and an oral tablet (450 mg once daily). Any references herein to RELISTOR do not imply that any other form or possible use of the drug has received approval. RELISTOR subcutaneous injection is being sold in the U.S., European Union (“E.U.”), and Canada, and RELISTOR tablets are being sold in the U.S. RELISTOR’s approved U.S. label and full U.S. prescribing information is available at www.RELISTOR.com. Other approved labels for RELISTOR apply in ex-U.S. markets.

Leronlimab (PRO 140) is a fully humanized monoclonal antibody which is a cellular targeting CCR5 entry antagonist and is currently in Phase 3 development for the treatment of HIV infection. It is owned by CytoDyn and, pursuant to our agreement with CytoDyn, we have the right to receive certain milestone and royalty payments. CytoDyn announced in March 2019 that it filed its first of three sections of its Biologics License Application (“BLA”) to the FDA for leronlimab for the treatment of HIV under the Rolling Review process.

 

29

Table

Leronlimab (PRO 140)

Leronlimab (PRO 140) is an investigational humanized IgG4 mAb that blocks CCR5, a cellular receptor that is important in HIV infection, tumor metastases, and other diseases including NASH. It is owned by CytoDyn Inc. (“CytoDyn”) pursuant to our agreement with CytoDyn, as described below. In April 2020, CytoDyn announced it submitted a Biologics License Application to the FDA for approval of Contents

Leronlimab in combination therapy for HIV infection.

Strategic partnerships:

 

Bausch Agreement

 

Under our agreement with Salix Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Bausch Health Companies Inc. (“Bausch”, which is the predecessor of Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, Inc.), we receivedrecognized a development milestone payment of $40.0 million upon U.S. marketing approval for subcutaneous RELISTOR in non-cancer pain patients in 2014, and a development milestone payment of $50.0 million for the U.S. marketing approval of an oral formulation of RELISTOR in 2016.July 2016 and a $10.0 million sales milestone for achieving RELISTOR U.S. net sales in excess of $100.0 million in 2019. We are also eligible to receive up to $200.0$190.0 million of commercializationone-time sales milestone payments upon first achievement of specified U.S. net sales targets, in any single calendar year. The following table summarizes the commercialization milestones:including:

 

U.S. Net Sales Levels in any Single Calendar Year

 

Payment

  

Payment

 
 

(In thousands)

  

(In thousands)

 

In excess of $100 million

 $10,000 

In excess of $150 million

  15,000   15,000 

In excess of $200 million

  20,000   20,000 

In excess of $300 million

  30,000   30,000 

In excess of $750 million

  50,000   50,000 

In excess of $1 billion

  75,000   75,000 
 $200,000  $190,000 

 

Each commercialization milestone payment is payable one time only, regardless of the number of times the condition is satisfied, and all six payments could be made within the same calendar year. We are also eligible to receive royalties from Bausch and its affiliates based on the following royalty scale: 15% on worldwide net sales up to $100 million, 17% on the next $400 million in worldwide net sales, and 19% on worldwide net sales over $500 million each calendar year, and 60% of any upfront, milestone, reimbursement or other revenue (net of costs of goods sold, as defined, and territory-specific research and development expense reimbursement) Bausch receives from sublicensees outside the U.S.

 

Bayer Agreement 

 

Under our April 2016 agreement with a subsidiary of Bayer granting Bayer exclusive worldwide rights to develop and commercialize products using our PSMA antibody technology, in combination with Bayer’s alpha-emitting radionuclides, we received an upfront payment of $4.0 million and milestone payments totaling $5.0 million and could receive up to an additional $44.0 million in potential clinical and regulatory development milestones. We are also entitled to single-digit royalties on net sales, and potential net sales milestone payments up to an aggregate total of $130.0 million.

 

CytoDyn Agreement

 

Leronlimab (PRO 140) is an investigational humanized IgG4 mAb that blocks CCR5, a cellular receptor that is important in HIV infection, tumor metastases, and other diseases including NASH.

We sold Leronlimab (PRO 140) to CytoDyn Inc. (“CytoDyn”) in 2012, which sale included milestone and royalty payment obligations to us. Leronlimab is a fully humanized monoclonal antibody which is a cellular targeting CCR5 entry antagonist and is currently in development for the treatment of HIV.

Under our 2012 agreement with CytoDyn, CytoDyn is responsible for all development, manufacturing and commercialization efforts. Pursuant to such agreement, we have received $5.0 million in upfront and milestone payments, together with rights to receive an additional $5.0 million upon the first U.S. or E.U. approval for the sale of the drug, and a 5% royalty on the net sales of approved product(s).

 

ROTOP Agreement

 

WeIn May 2019, we entered into an exclusive license agreement with ROTOP, a Germany-based developer of radiopharmaceuticals for nuclear medicine diagnostics, to develop, manufacture and commercialize 1404 in Europe.

 

Under the terms of the collaboration, ROTOP will beis responsible for the development, regulatory approvals and commercialization of 1404 in Europe while Progenics is entitled to double-digit, tiered royalties on net sales of 1404 in Europe. ROTOP is in discussions with EMA regarding the territory.development path in Europe.

 

FUJIFILM Agreement

 

WeIn June 2019, we entered into a transfer agreement with FUJIFILM for the rights to the Company’s aBSI product in Japan for use under the name BONENAVI.

 

Under the terms of the transfer agreement, FUJIFILM acquired, by a combination of purchase and license, the Japanese software, source code, supporting data and all Japanese patents associated with the aBSI product from Progenics for use in Japan. In exchange, Progenics received $4.0 million in an upfront payment and FUJIFILM agreed to pay Progenics support and service fees for aBSI and other AI products over the next three years in Japan. BONENAVI has been licensed to FUJIFILM for use in Japan since 2011.

 

Results of Operations

 

The following table is an overview of our results of operations (in thousands, except percentages):

 

 

Three Months Ended

      

Six Months Ended

      

Three Months Ended

 
 

June 30,

      

June 30,

      

March 31,

 
 

2019

  

2018

  

Change

  

2019

  

2018

  

Change

  

2020

  

2019

 

Total revenue

 $9,966  $3,878   157% $14,247  $7,067   102% $6,248  $4,281 

Operating expenses

 $29,059  $18,216   (60%) $51,575  $33,823   (52%) $22,134  $22,516 

Operating loss

 $(19,093) $(14,338)  (33%) $(37,328) $(26,756)  (40%) $(15,886) $(18,235)

Net loss

 $(19,700) $(15,172)  (30%) $(38,435) $(28,596)  (34%) $(16,801) $(18,735)

 

Revenue 

 

Our sources of revenue include AZEDRA product sales, royalties and license fees from Bausch and other collaborators. The following table is a summary of our worldwide revenue (in thousands, except percentages):

 

 

Three Months Ended

      

Six Months Ended

      

Three Months Ended

     
 

June 30,

      

June 30,

      

March 31,

     

Source

 

2019

  

2018

  

Change

  

2019

  

2018

  

Change

  

2020

  

2019

  

Change

 

AZEDRA product sales

 $270  $-   N/A  $270  $-   N/A  $1,359  $-   N/A 

Royalty income

  3,593   3,530   2%  7,754   6,588   18%  4,789   4,161   15%

License and other revenue

  6,103   348   1654%  6,223   479   1199%  100   120   (17%)

Total revenue

 $9,966  $3,878   157% $14,247  $7,067   102% $6,248  $4,281   46%

 

AZEDRA product sales.In June 2019 we recorded our firstWe began commercial product sales of AZEDRA in the U.S. in June 2019 (no sales-related deductions or discounts were applicable to the June 2019 sales)date). There were noAZEDRA sales of AZEDRAtotaled approximately $1.4 million for the threequarter ended March 31, 2020. Due to the impact of COVID-19, we expect corresponding product revenue to reflect the challenging environment until restrictions are lifted and six months ended June 30, 2018, asregular AZEDRA was not approved until July 2018.dosing recommences.

 

Royalty income. We recognized royalty income primarily based on the below net sales of RELISTOR, as reported to us by Bausch (in thousands, except percentages).

 

 

Three Months Ended

      

Six Months Ended

      

Three Months Ended

     
 

June 30,

      

June 30,

      

March 31,

     
 

2019

  

2018

  

Change

  

2019

  

2018

  

Change

  

2020

  

2019

  

Change

 

U.S.

 $23,800  $23,500   1% $50,200  $43,800   15% $31,100  $26,400   18%

Outside U.S.

  200   -   N/A   1,500   100   1400%  800   1,300   (38%)

Worldwide net sales of RELISTOR

 $24,000  $23,500   2% $51,700  $43,900   18% $31,900  $27,700   15%

 

Royalty income increased by $0.1$0.6 million, or 2%15%, during the three months ended June 30, 2019,March 31, 2020, compared to the same period in 2018, and by $1.2 million, or 18% during the six months ended June 30, 2019, compared to the same period in 2018, due primarily to higher net sales.sales of RELISTOR.

 

License and otherother revenue. The license and other revenue increaseddecreased by $5.8 million and $5.7 million$20 thousand, or 17% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019, respectively,March 31, 2020, compared to the same periodsperiod in 2018. These increases were primarily due to the achievement2019.

 

Operating Expenses

 

The following table is a summary of our operating expenses (in thousands, except percentages):

 

 

Three Months Ended

      

Six Months Ended

      

Three Months Ended

     
 

June 30,

      

June 30,

      

March 31,

     

Operating Expenses

 

2019

  

2018

  

Change

  

2019

  

2018

  

Change

  

2020

  

2019

  

Change

 

Cost of goods sold

 $493  $-   N/A  $493  $-   N/A  $1,558  $-   N/A 

Research and development

  13,080   9,347   (40%)  25,472   17,457   (46%)  10,367   12,392   16%

Selling, general and administrative

  14,570   7,569   (92%)  23,794   14,266   (67%)  10,509   9,224   (14%)

Change in contingent consideration liability

  916   1,300   30%  1,816   2,100   14%  (300)  900   133%

Total operating expenses

 $29,059  $18,216   (60%) $51,575  $33,823   (52%) $22,134  $22,516   2%

Cost of Goods Sold(“COGS”)

 

COGSCost of goods sold includes cost of direct materials and labor and indirect expenses used in the manufacturing of AZEDRA beginning with the first commercial sale in June 2019.

 

Research and Development (R&D)

 

We do not track fully burdened R&D costs separately for each of our product candidates. We review our R&D expenses by focusing on external and internal development costs. External development costs consist of costs associated with our clinical trials, including pharmaceutical development and manufacturing of clinical trial materials.investments in manufacturing. Included in other costs are external corporate overhead costs that are not specific or allocated to any one program. Internal costs consist of salaries and wages, share-based compensation and benefits, which are not tracked by program as several of our departments support multiple development programs. The following table summarizes the external costs attributable to each program and internal costs (in thousands):

 

  

Three Months Ended June 30,

  

Six Months Ended June 30,

 
  

2019

  

2018

  

2019

  

2018

 

External Costs

                

PyL

 $3,996  $2,578  $7,148  $4,168 

AZEDRA

  1,758   1,203   5,469   2,373 

1404

  89   679   216   1,964 

1095

  2,085   187   2,963   570 

PSMA AI

  291   428   598   598 

Other

  1,551   1,212   2,196   1,374 

Total External Costs

 $9,770  $6,287  $18,590  $11,047 

Internal Costs

  3,310   3,060   6,882   6,410 

Total R&D Costs

 $13,080  $9,347  $25,472  $17,457 

   

Three Months Ended March 31,

 
   

2020

  

2019

 

External Costs

         

PyL

  $2,361  $3,152 

AZEDRA

   334   3,711 
1404   20   127 
1095   3,154   878 

PSMA AI

   305   307 

Other

   786   645 

Total External Costs

  $6,960  $8,820 
          

Internal Costs

   3,407   3,572 

Total R&D Costs

  $10,367  $12,392 

 

R&D expenses increaseddecreased by $3.7$2.0 million, or 40%16%, during the three months ended June 30, 2019,March 31, 2020, compared to the same period in 2018,2019, resulting primarily resulting from higherlower clinical trial costs and contract manufacturing costs for clinical trial materials for 1095 and PyL, as well as higher costs associated with theto transition for the AZEDRA manufacturing site and additional production capacity for iodine-based products. R&D expenses increased by $8.0 million, or 46%, duringin the six months ended June 30, 2019 compared to the same period in 2018, primarily due to higher costs associated with the transition for the AZEDRA manufacturing site and additional production capacity for iodine-based products, higher clinical trial and contract manufacturing costs for clinical trial materials for 1095 and PyL, partially offset by lower clinical trial costs for 1404.period.

 

Selling, General and Administrative (SG&A)

 

SG&ASelling, general and administrative expenses increased by $7.0$1.3 million, or 92% and $9.5 million, or 67%,14% during the three and six months ended June 30, 2019, respectively,March 31, 2020, compared to the same periodsperiod in 2018. The three and six months increases were2019, primarily dueattributable to higher legal and advisory fees of $5.5 million and $5.9 million, respectively, associated with the contested election at our 2019 Annual Meetingexecution of Shareholders, higher PSMA-617 litigation costs of $1.0 million and $1.8 million, respectively, and higher costs associatedthe Merger Agreement with the buildout of commercial infrastructure to support the launch and distribution of AZEDRA.Lantheus.

 

Change in Contingent Consideration Liability

 

The changedecrease in the contingent consideration liability of $0.9$0.3 million during the three months ended June 30, 2019March 31, 2020 was primarily attributable to an increasea decrease in the AZEDRA sales forecasts, associated with the planned initiation of a basket study to expand the label for AZEDRA,partially offset by an increase due shorter discount period and higher volatility, which is used to calculate the potential milestone payments to former MIP stockholders, compared to a changean increase of $1.3$0.9 million in the same period in 2018,2019, resulting primarily from higher estimated probability of success of AZEDRA. The contingent consideration liability increased by $1.8 million during the six months ended June 30, 2019, primarily due to an increase in the AZEDRA sales forecasts associated with the planned initiation of a basket study to expand the label for AZEDRA and first quarter increase in the probability of success for the AZEDRA commercialization milestone. The contingent consideration liability increased by $2.1 million duringmilestone and a decrease in the six months ended June 30, 2018, primarily due to a higher estimated probability of success of AZEDRA.discount period.

 

Other (Expense) Income

 

The following table is a summary of our other (expense) income (in thousands, except percentages):

 

 

Three Months Ended

      

Six Months Ended

      

Three Months Ended

     
 

June 30,

      

June 30,

      

March 31,

     
 

2019

  

2018

  

Change

  

2019

  

2018

  

Change

  

2020

  

2019

  

Change

 

Interest (expense) income, net

 $(538) $(856)  37% $(967) $(1,799)  46% $(854) $(429)  (99%)

Other (expense) income, net

  (69)  (74)  7%  (140)  (137)  (2%)  (61)  (71)  14%

Other (expense) income

 $(607) $(930)  35% $(1,107) $(1,936)  43% $(915) $(500)  (83%)

 

Total other (expense) income, net decreasedincreased by $0.3$0.4 million, or 35%, and $0.8 million, or 43%83%, during the three and six months ended June 30, 2019,March 31, 2020, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2018.2019, primarily attributable to lower interest income due to lower average cash balances during 2020, partially offset by lower interest expense resulting from lower debt balance in 2020.

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

The following table is a summary of selected financial data (in thousands):

 

  

June 30,

  

December 31,

 
  

2019

  

2018

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 $84,823  $137,686 

Accounts receivable, net

 $10,569  $3,803 

Total assets

 $152,781  $169,497 

Working capital

 $76,627  $120,683 

  

March 31,

  

December 31,

 
  

2020

  

2019

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 $29,531  $42,049 

Accounts receivable, net

 $6,190  $15,976 

Total assets

 $98,344  $119,470 

Working capital

 $21,447  $41,664 

 

Our current principal sources of revenue from operations are AZEDRA sales, royalties, and development and commercial milestones.milestones from strategic partnerships. Our principal sources of liquidity are our existing cash and cash equivalents. As of June 30, 2019,March 31, 2020, we had cash and cash equivalents of approximately $84.8$29.5 million, a decrease of $52.9$12.5 million from $137.7$42.0 million at December 31, 2018,2019, reflecting primarily cash used for operating expenses and capital expenditures, partially offset by the receipt of the $10.0 million RELISTOR sales milestone.

On February 20, 2020, we announced the signing of the Merger Agreement for the acquisition, transition and start-up costsproposed merger of Progenics with Lantheus Holdings. The Merger Agreement reflects the renegotiation of certain of the Somerset manufacturing siteterms of our original agreement for the AZEDRA launch. We expectproposed merger entered into on October 1, 2019. On April 2, 2020, Progenics and Lantheus Holdings announced their decision to reschedule their respective special meetings of stockholders to vote on the matters related to the proposed merger of Progenics and Lantheus Holdings from April 28, 2020 to June 16, 2020. The rescheduling of the special meetings is intended to allow both companies the time necessary to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic and its effect on each company’s business and on the combined entity.

While we strongly believe that the proposed merger with Lantheus Holdings represents the best path forward for the Company, if the proposed merger is not ultimately consummated, we will operate on a stand-alone basis and will continue to have significant cash requirements to support product development activities, commercialization of AZEDRA and the commercial launch of AZEDRA.pre-launch activities for PyL. The amount and timing of our cash requirements will depend on the progress and success of our clinical development programs, regulatory and market acceptance, and the resources we devote to research and commercialization activities. TheAdditionally, under specified circumstances, we may be required to pay Lantheus Holdings a termination fee of $18.34 million or reimburse Lantheus Holdings up to $5.2 million of its reasonable and out-of-pocket costs and expenses incurred in connection with the Merger Agreement.

On March 15, 2020, Progenics, as borrower, and Lantheus Medical Imaging, as lender, entered into the Bridge Loan Agreement, pursuant to which Lantheus Medical Imaging agreed to provide for a secured short-term loan to the Company on or after May 1, 2020 in an aggregate principal amount of cash on-hand will dependup to $10 million. The bridge loan matures on the progressearlier to occur of various clinical(a) September 30, 2020 and (b) the date on which the Company enters into a debt financing or similar arrangements or any amendment to, or replacement of, its existing debt, provided by one or more third parties following the termination date of the Merger Agreement, in either case, having aggregate net cash proceeds that exceed the amount then required to repay all obligations under the Bridge Loan Agreement in full in cash. The bridge loan bears interest at a rate per annum of 9.5% and is secured through the pledge to Lantheus Medical Imaging of all of the issued and outstanding shares of capital stock of MIP, and any debt of MIP owed to Progenics. Progenics will use the proceeds of the bridge loan for working capital and other general corporate purposes.

Consistent with regular practice for a growth-stage pharmaceutical or biotechnology company, and as we have done in the past, we anticipate the need, and are exploring options for, additional financing in order to meet our cash requirements if the proposed merger with Lantheus Holdings is not consummated and we believe we have a viable strategy to do so. However, there can be no assurances that we will be able to obtain additional capital on acceptable terms and in the amounts necessary to fully fund our current operating expenses or reduced operating expenses reflecting delays or reductions in the scope of our product development programs potential salesbeyond one year from the launch of AZEDRA, anddate this annual report is issued. As such, we believe there is substantial doubt regarding our ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the achievement of various milestones and royalties under our existing license agreements.

We believe that our current cash and cash equivalents will be sufficient to fund our operations for at leastdate this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q is filed with the next twelve months. We expect to fund our operations going forward with existing cash resources, anticipated revenues from our existing license agreements, sales of AZEDRA, and cash that we may raise through future capital raising and other financing transactions.

If weSEC. The financial statements do not realize sufficient royalty or milestone revenue from our license agreements, salesinclude any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of AZEDRA, or areliabilities that might be necessary should we be unable to enter into favorable collaboration, license, asset sale, additional capital raising, or other financing transactions, we will have to reduce, delay, or eliminate spending on certain programs, and/or take other economic measures.continue as a going concern.

 

Cash Flows

 

The following table is a summary of our cash flow activities (in thousands):

 

 

Six Months Ended

  

Three Months Ended

 
 

June 30,

  

March 31,

 
 

2019

  

2018

  

2020

  

2019

 

Net cash used in operating activities

 $(38,700) $(25,189) $(7,607) $(18,519)

Net cash used in investing activities

 $(10,104) $(502) $(3,553) $(8,491)

Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities

 $(2,323) $22,636 

Net cash used in financing activities

 $(1,520) $(1,037)

 

Operating Activities

 

Net cash used in operating activities during the sixthree months ended June 30, 2019March 31, 2020 was primarily attributable to funding operating expenses, net of non-cash items including the change in fair value of contingent consideration liability.

 

Investing Activities

 

Net cash used in investing activities during the sixthree months ended June 30, 2019March 31, 2020 was primarily related to the acquisition of AZEDRA manufacturing assets in Somerset, New Jersey and capital expenditures at contract manufacturing organizations related to additional iodine manufacturing capacity.increase production capacity to satisfy increasing expected demand and provide redundancy for iodine-based products.

 

Financing Activities

 

Net cash used in financing activities during the sixthree months ended June 30, 2019March 31, 2020 was primarily attributable to repayment of debt under the Royalty-Backed Loan with HealthCare Royalty Partners III, L.P.L.P, partially offset by proceeds received from exercise of stock options.

 

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Guarantees

 

We have no obligations under off-balance sheet arrangements and do not guarantee the obligations of any other unconsolidated entity.

 

Critical Accounting Policies

 

We prepare our financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. Our significant accounting policies are disclosed in Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies to our consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018.2019. The selection and application of these accounting principles and methods requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, as well as certain financial statement disclosures. We evaluate these estimates on an ongoing basis. We base these estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe reasonable under the circumstances. The results of these evaluations form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not otherwise readily apparent. While we believe that the estimates and assumptions, we use in preparing the financial statements are appropriate, they are subject to a number of factors and uncertainties regarding their ultimate outcome and, therefore, actual results could differ from these estimates.

 

There have been no changes to our critical accounting policies and estimates as of and for the sixthree months ended June 30, 2019March 31, 2020 as noted in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018.2019.

 

Recent Accounting Developments

 

Refer to our discussion of recently adopted accounting pronouncements and other recent accounting pronouncements in Note 2. New Accounting Pronouncements to the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

 

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

 

Our primary investment objective isWe are a smaller reporting company as defined by Item 10(f)(1) of Regulation S-K under the Securities Act and as such are not required to preserve principal. Our money market funds have variable interest rates and totaled $82.7 million at June 30, 2019. As a result, we do not believe that these investment balances have a material exposure to interest-rate risk.provide information under this Item.

The majority of our business is conducted in U.S. dollars. However, we do conduct certain transactions in other currencies, including Euros, British Pounds, Swiss Francs, and Swedish Krona. Historically, fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates have not materially affected our condensed consolidated results of operations, and during the three and six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, our consolidated results of operations were not materially affected by fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates.

 

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

 

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the timelines specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Interim Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Interim Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and in reaching a reasonable level of assurance, management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. We have a Disclosure Committee consisting of certain members of our senior management which monitors and implements our policy of disclosing material information concerning the Company in accordance with applicable law.

 

As required by SEC Rule 13a-15(e), we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of senior management, including our CEO and CFO, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon the foregoing, our CEO and CFO concluded that our current disclosure controls and procedures, as designed and implemented, were effective at the reasonable assurance level.

 

There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in the Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f), during our last fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting.

 

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

 

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

 

There have been no material changes from the information discussed in Part I, Item 3. Legal Proceedings of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018.2019. We are or may be from time to time involved in various other disputes, governmental, and/or regulatory inspections, inquiries, investigations, and proceedings that could result in litigation, and other litigation matters that arise from time to time. The process of resolving matters through litigation or other means is inherently uncertain and it is possible that an unfavorable resolution of these matters will adversely affect us, our results of operations, financial condition, and cash flows. Refer to our discussionthe information discussed under “Legal Proceedings” in Note 8. Commitments and Contingencies to the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

 

Item 1A. Risk Factors

 

The following risk factorfactors and other information included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q should be carefully considered. Other than the risk factorfactors below, there have been no material changes from the information discussed in Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018.2019. You should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties we discusseddiscuss below and in our Form 10-K before deciding to invest in, or retain, shares of our common stock. These are not the only risks and uncertainties that we face. Additional risks and uncertainties that we do not currently know about or that we currently believe are immaterial, or that we have not predicted, may also harm our business operations or adversely affect us. If any of these risks or uncertainties actually occur, our business, financial condition, operating results, or liquidity could be materially harmed.

Our business could be negatively affected as a result

 

Activist stockholders may, from timeGeneral Risks Related to time, attempt to effect changes in our strategic direction and how our company is governedBusiness

A pandemic, epidemic or may seek to acquire control over our company. Activist stockholders may seek to increase short-term stockholder value by advocating corporate actionsoutbreak of an infectious disease, such as financial restructuring, increased borrowing, special dividends, stock repurchases,COVID-19, or even sales of assets or the entire company. Activist campaigns can also seek to change the composition of our board of directors,coronavirus, may materially and campaigns that contest or conflict with our strategic direction could have an adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition. We may not be able to successfully defend against activist stockholders, which could be disruptive to our business. Even if we were to successfully defend against any future proxy contest or future or ongoing activist campaign, responding to activist stockholders can be costly and time-consuming, and can divert significant time and attention of our board of directors and management from pursuing our business strategies.

In May 2019, Velan Capital, L.P., Altiva Management Inc., Balaji Venkataraman, Virinder Nohria, LTE Partners, LLC, LTE Management, LLC, Melkonian Capital Management, LLC, Ryan Melkonian, Terence Cooke and Deepak Sarpangal initiated a withhold campaign, seeking stockholder support to vote against or abstain from voting on the re-election of certain directors of the Company at the 2019 annual meeting of stockholders. Based on final voting results, two directors did not receive a majority of votes cast. In accordance with the Company’s By-Laws, each of our directors submitted a contingent resignation to the Board, which becomes effective only if a director does not receive sufficient votes for re-election at an annual meeting and the Board accepts the resignation. On August 7, 2019, in accordance with the Company’s By-Laws and the recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, the Board accepted the contingent resignations of Peter J. Crowley and Michael D. Kishbauch, with an effective date of October 17, 2019, 90 days following the certification of the election results from the 2019 annual meeting of stockholders, or such earlier time as the Board determines the responsibilities of the resigning directors have been sufficiently transitioned to the remaining Board members.

We may choose to initiate, or may become subject to, litigation as a result of continued or further stockholder activist campaigns, which would serve as a further distraction to our board of directors and management and could require us to incur significant additional costs.

Actions such as those described above could cause significant fluctuations in our stock price based upon temporary or speculative market perceptions or other factors that do not necessarily reflect the underlying fundamentals and prospects of our business. Such actions may also result in unanticipated perceived uncertainties as to our future direction, control, and ability to execute on our strategy, which could lead to the perception of instability or a change in the direction of our business, as well as a belief that the board of directors might decide to implement changes to its composition or management. Such perceptions and beliefs may result in the loss of potential business opportunities, make it more difficult to pursue our strategic initiatives, or limit our ability to attract and retain qualified personnel and business partners, any of which could adversely affect our business and operatingour financial results.

The recent outbreak of COVID-19 originated in Wuhan, China in December 2019. In March 2020, the World Health Organization declared COVID-19 a pandemic. The spread of COVID-19 has affected segments of the global economy, disrupted global supply chains, and created significant volatility and disruption of financial markets. The recent COVID-19 outbreak and restrictions intended to slow the spread of COVID-19, including quarantines, government-mandated actions, stay-at-home orders and other restrictions, have adversely affected our business. We have taken and will continue to take temporary precautionary measures in alignment with government, regulatory and public health recommendations in relation to the COVID-19 pandemic. For example, we have instituted policies to help minimize the risk of spreading COVID-19 to our employees such as requiring certain employees to work remotely and suspending non-essential travel. Our increased reliance on personnel working from home may negatively impact productivity, or disrupt, delay or otherwise adversely impact our business. Additionally, many multidisciplinary treatment centers for patients have banned, or have limited access to external visitors, including the field-based sales team for AZEDRA, to ensure the safety of patients and healthcare providers. As a result, the Company has furloughed a portion of the clinical, commercial and medical employees to support cost saving measures as the Company continues to navigate through the changing COVID-19 environment.

COVID-19 has also affected our operations by causing a period of business disruption, including the interruption of certain clinical trial activities. For example, we and Lantheus Holdings rescheduled our respective special meetings of stockholders to vote on matters related to the proposed merger of Lantheus Holdings and Progenics from April 28, 2020, to June 16, 2020 in order to allow for the time necessary to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic and its effect on each company’s business and on the combined company. Additionally, the continued spread of COVID-19 globally has adversely impacted our clinical trial operations, including our ability to recruit and retain patients and principal investigators and site staff who, as healthcare providers, may have heightened exposure to COVID-19 if an outbreak has occurred in their geography, which can in turn impact our pipeline milestones. COVID-19, or another infectious disease, could also negatively affect our manufacturing operations, which could result in delays or disruptions in the supply of our product candidates. In addition, there could be a potential effect of COVID-19 to the business at FDA or other health authorities, which could result in delays of reviews and approvals, including with respect to our product candidates.

The ultimate extent to which the COVID-19 outbreak and its repercussions impact our business will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted. However, the foregoing and other continued disruptions to our business as a result of COVID-19 could result in a material adverse effect on our business and our results of operation and financial condition.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

There have been no events that are required to be reported under this Item.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

There have been no events that are required to be reported under this Item.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

Item 5. Other Information

There have been no events that are required to be reported under this Item.

 

 

Item 6. Exhibits 

(a) Exhibits

 

Exhibit

Number *

Description

 

 

2.1 (1)

Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of October 1, 2019, among Lantheus Holdings, Inc., Plato Merger Sub, Inc. and Progenics Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

2.2 (2)

Amended and Restated Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of February 20, 2020, among Lantheus Holdings, Inc., Plato Merger Sub, Inc. and Progenics Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

3.1(1)(3)

Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant.Progenics Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

3.23.1(2) (4)

Amended and Restated By-laws of the Registrant.Progenics Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

4.1(35)

Specimen Certificate for Common Stock, $0.0013 par value per share, of the Registrant.Progenics Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

10.1(46)

Progenics Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 2018 Performance Incentive Plan.

10.2(57)

Settlement and License Agreement by and among Progenics Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, Inc., Salix Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Wyeth LLC, and Actavis LLC., entered into as of May 25, 2018.

10.3(68)

Settlement and License Agreement by and among Progenics Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, Inc., Salix Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Wyeth LLC, and Par Sterile Products, LLC and Par Pharmaceutical, Inc., dated May 10, 2018.

10.4(7)(9)

Amendment to the Stock Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated May 9, 2019, by and between Progenics Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Molecular Insight Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and Highland Capital Management, L.P., as stockholders’ representative.

10.5

Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Award Agreement for Directors under the 2018 Performance Incentive Plan.

10.6

Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Award Agreement for Employees under the 2018 Performance Incentive Plan.

10.7 (10)

Consulting Services Agreement, dated as of March 4, 2020, by and between Progenics Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Patrick Fabbio.

10.8 (11)

Bridge Loan Agreement, dated as of March 15, 2020, between Progenics Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Lantheus Medical Imaging, Inc.

31.1

Certification of Mark R. Baker,David W. Mims, Interim Chief Executive Officer, Interim Chief Financial Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) of the Registrant,Progenics Pharmaceuticals, Inc., pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

31.2

Certification of Patrick Fabbio, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) of the Registrant, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

3232.1

Certification of the Interim Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

101

Interactive Data Files:

101.INS

XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema

101.CAL

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase

101.LAB

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase

101.PRE

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase

101.DEF

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Document

 


*     Exhibits footnoted as previously filed have been filed as an exhibit to the document of the Registrant or other registrant referenced in the footnote below, and are incorporated by reference herein.

 

(1)      Previously filed in Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 2, 2019.

(2)      Previously filed in Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 20, 2020.

(3)      Previously filed in Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 13, 2013.

(4)      Previously filed in Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 15, 2019.

(5)      Previously filed in Registration Statement on Form S-1, Commission File No. 333-13627.

(6)      Previously filed in Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 14, 2018.

(7)      Previously filed in Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 31, 2018.

(8)      Previously filed in Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 11, 2018.

(9)      Previously filed in Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 14, 2019.

(10)     Previously filed in Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 4, 2020.

(11)     Previously filed in Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 15, 2020.

Previously filed in Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 13, 2013.

(2)

Previously filed in Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 1, 2019.

(3)

Previously filed in Registration Statement on Form S-1, Commission File No. 333-13627.

(4)

Previously filed in Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 14, 2018.

(5)

Previously filed in Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 31, 2018.

(6)

Previously filed in Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 11, 2018.

(7)

Previously filed in Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 14, 2019.

 

 

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 

 

PROGENICS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.

Date: August 9, 2019May 7, 2020

By:

/s/ Patrick FabbioDavid W. Mims

 

 

Patrick FabbioDavid W. Mims

Interim Chief Executive Vice President andOfficer, Interim Chief Financial Officer and Director

(Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

 

 

38

43