UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

☒ QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the period ended June 30, ~~2019~~2020

☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission file number 001-36157

ESSENT GROUP LTD.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



Bermuda		Not Applicable
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

Clarendon House

2 Church Street

Hamilton HM11, Bermuda

(Address of principal executive offices and zip code)

(441) 297-9901

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:



Title of each class	Trading Symbol(s)	Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Shares, $0.015 par value	ESNT	New York Stock Exchange

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232-405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files.) Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.



Large accelerated filer	☒	Accelerated filer	☐
Non-accelerated filer	☐	Smaller reporting company	☐
		Emerging growth company	☐

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒

The number of the registrant’s common shares outstanding as of August ~~1, 2019~~3, 2020 was ~~98,384,801.~~112,423,304.

Essent Group Ltd. and Subsidiaries

Form 10-Q

Index



PART I.	FINANCIAL INFORMATION	1

Item 1.	Financial Statements (Unaudited)	1

	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)	1

	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Unaudited)	2

	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity (Unaudited)	3

	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)	4

	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)	5

Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	2327

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	4248

Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	4248

PART II.	OTHER INFORMATION	4349

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	4349

Item 1A.	Risk Factors	4349

Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	4350

Item 5.	Other Information	51

Item 6.	Exhibits	4451

SIGNATURES		4552

Table of Contents

Unless the context otherwise indicates or requires, the terms “we,” “our,” “us,” “Essent,” and the “Company,” as used in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, refer to Essent Group Ltd. and its directly and indirectly owned subsidiaries, including our primary operating subsidiaries, Essent Guaranty, Inc. and Essent Reinsurance Ltd., as a combined entity, except where otherwise stated or where it is clear that the terms mean only Essent Group Ltd. exclusive of its subsidiaries.

SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, or Quarterly Report, includes forward-looking statements pursuant to the “safe harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements relate to expectations, beliefs, projections, future plans and strategies, anticipated events or trends and similar expressions concerning matters that are not historical facts or present facts or conditions, such as statements regarding our future financial condition or results of operations, our prospects and strategies for future growth, the introduction of new products and services, and the implementation of our marketing and branding strategies. In many cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terms such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “expects,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “predicts,” “potential” or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology.

The forward-looking statements contained in this Quarterly Report reflect our views as of the date of this Quarterly Report about future events and are subject to risks, uncertainties, assumptions and changes in circumstances that may cause events or our actual activities or results to differ significantly from those expressed in any forward-looking statement. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future events, results, actions, levels of activity, performance or achievements. A number of important factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated by the forward-looking statements, including, but not limited to, those factors described below, in Part I, Item 2 “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” of this Quarterly Report, and in Part I, Item 1A “Risk Factors” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2018~~2019 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. These factors include, without limitation, the following:

the duration, spread and severity of the outbreak of novel coronavirus disease 2019 ("COVID-19"), which is currently ongoing and still evolving; the actions taken to contain the virus or treat its impact, including government and GSE actions to mitigate the economic impact of the outbreak; the nature and extent of the forbearance and modification options available to borrowers affected by the outbreak on mortgages we insure; reserve and other accounting estimates relating to the impact of the COVID-19 outbreak; borrower behavior in response to the outbreak and its economic impact; how quickly and to what extent normal economic and operating conditions can resume, including whether any future outbreaks interrupt economic recovery; how quickly and to what extent affected borrowers can recover from the negative economic impact of the outbreak; and whether and to what extent the outbreak and related economic conditions will exacerbate other risks and uncertainties facing our business, financial condition and business strategy;

changes in or to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which we refer to collectively as the GSEs, whether through Federal legislation, restructurings or a shift in business practices;

failure to continue to meet the mortgage insurer eligibility requirements of the GSEs;

competition for our customers or the loss of a significant customer;

lenders or investors seeking alternatives to private mortgage insurance;

increase in the number of loans insured through Federal government mortgage insurance programs, including those offered by the Federal Housing Administration;

decline in the volume of low down payment mortgage originations;

uncertainty of loss reserve estimates;

decrease in the length of time our insurance policies are in force;

deteriorating economic conditions;

recently enacted U.S. Federal tax reform and its impact on us, our shareholders and our operations;

Table of Contents

the definition of “Qualified Mortgage” reducing the size of the mortgage origination market or creating incentives to use government mortgage insurance programs;

the definition of “Qualified Residential Mortgage” reducing the number of low down payment loans or lenders and investors seeking alternatives to private mortgage insurance;

the implementation of the Basel III Capital Accord, which may discourage the use of private mortgage insurance;

management of risk in our investment portfolio;

fluctuations in interest rates;

~~Table of Contents~~

inadequacy of the premiums we charge to compensate for our losses incurred;

dependence on management team and qualified personnel;

disturbance to our information technology systems;

change in our customers’ capital requirements discouraging the use of mortgage insurance;

declines in the value of borrowers’ homes;

limited availability of ~~capital;~~capital or reinsurance;

unanticipated claims arise under and risks associated with our contract underwriting program;

industry practice that loss reserves are established only upon a loan default;

disruption in mortgage loan ~~servicing;~~servicing, as a result of COVID-19 or otherwise;

risk of future legal proceedings;

customers’ technological demands;

our non-U.S. operations becoming subject to U.S. Federal income taxation;

becoming considered a passive foreign investment company for U.S. Federal income tax purposes; and

potential restrictions on the ability of our insurance subsidiaries to pay dividends.

Readers are urged to consider these factors carefully in evaluating the forward-looking statements and are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. All of the forward-looking statements we have included in this Quarterly Report are based on information available to us on the date of this Quarterly Report. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as otherwise required by law.

iii

Table of Contents

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Essent Group Ltd. and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)


	June 30,		December 31,			June 30,		December 31,
(In thousands, except per share amounts)	2019		2018			2020		2019
Assets
Investments
Fixed maturities available for sale, at fair value (amortized cost: 2019 — $2,792,976; 2018 — $2,638,950)	$	2,848,746	$	2,605,666
Short-term investments available for sale, at fair value (amortized cost: 2019 — $251,464; 2018 — $154,400)	251,468		154,400
Fixed maturities available for sale, at fair value (amortized cost: 2020 — $3,078,843; 2019 — $2,967,225)						$	3,221,149	$	3,035,385
Short-term investments available for sale, at fair value (amortized cost: 2020 — $1,130,963; 2019 — $315,360)						1,130,954		315,362
Total investments available for sale	3,100,214		2,760,066			4,352,103		3,350,747
Other invested assets	69,853		30,952			78,536		78,873
Total investments	3,170,067		2,791,018			4,430,639		3,429,620
Cash	25,255		64,946			72,787		71,350
Accrued investment income	18,387		17,627			18,711		18,535
Accounts receivable	40,395		36,881			39,750		40,655
Deferred policy acquisition costs	15,830		16,049			15,856		15,705
Property and equipment (at cost, less accumulated depreciation of $55,696 in 2019 and $53,870 in 2018)	17,324		7,629
Property and equipment (at cost, less accumulated depreciation of $59,374 in 2020 and $57,639 in 2019)						15,458		17,308
Prepaid federal income tax	230,385		202,385			279,136		261,885
Other assets	22,256		13,436			27,611		18,367
Total assets	$	3,539,899	$	3,149,971		$	4,899,948	$	3,873,425

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Liabilities
Reserve for losses and LAE	$	55,138	$	49,464		$	250,890	$	69,362
Unearned premium reserve	295,234		295,467			258,567		278,887
Net deferred tax liability	216,660		172,642			272,746		249,620
Credit facility borrowings (at carrying value, less unamortized deferred costs of $1,050 in 2019 and $1,336 in 2018)	223,950		223,664
Securities purchases payable	5,041		2,041
Credit facility borrowings (at carrying value, less unamortized deferred costs of $477 in 2020 and $763 in 2019)						424,523		224,237
Other accrued liabilities	39,584		40,976			69,893		66,474
Total liabilities	835,607		784,254			1,276,619		888,580
Commitments and contingencies (see Note 7)
Stockholders’ Equity
Common shares, $0.015 par value:
Authorized - 233,333; issued and outstanding - 98,396 shares in 2019 and 98,139 shares in 2018	1,476		1,472
Authorized - 233,333; issued and outstanding - 112,423 shares in 2020 and 98,394 shares in 2019						1,686		1,476
Additional paid-in capital	1,110,893		1,110,800			1,561,737		1,118,655
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)	45,360		(28,993		)
Accumulated other comprehensive income						120,398		56,187
Retained earnings	1,546,563		1,282,438			1,939,508		1,808,527
Total stockholders’ equity	2,704,292		2,365,717			3,623,329		2,984,845
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	3,539,899	$	3,149,971		$	4,899,948	$	3,873,425

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

Essent Group Ltd. and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Unaudited)


	Three Months Ended June 30,					Six Months Ended June 30,					Three Months Ended June 30,					Six Months Ended June 30,
(In thousands, except per share amounts)	2019		2018			2019		2018			2020			2019		2020		2019
Revenues:
Net premiums written	$	188,404	$	168,404		$	366,048	$	333,629		$	205,904		$	188,404	$	397,647	$	366,048
Decrease (increase) in unearned premiums	86		(11,446		)	233		(24,113		)
Decrease in unearned premiums											5,567			86		20,320		233
Net premiums earned	188,490		156,958			366,281		309,516			211,471			188,490		417,967		366,281
Net investment income	20,581		15,134			40,461		28,848			19,866			20,581		40,499		40,461
Realized investment gains, net	583		439			1,243		636
Realized investment gains (losses), net											(1,269		)	583		1,866		1,243
Other income	2,238		1,237			4,433		2,231			6,009			2,238		4,585		4,433
Total revenues	211,892		173,768			412,418		341,231			236,077			211,892		464,917		412,418

Losses and expenses:
Provision for losses and LAE	4,960		1,813			12,067		7,122			175,877			4,960		183,940		12,067
Other underwriting and operating expenses	41,520		36,428			82,550		74,552			38,819			41,520		80,766		82,550
Interest expense	2,679		2,618			5,349		5,068			2,566			2,679		4,698		5,349
Total losses and expenses	49,159		40,859			99,966		86,742			217,262			49,159		269,404		99,966

Income before income taxes	162,733		132,909			312,452		254,489			18,815			162,733		195,513		312,452
Income tax expense	26,328		21,154			48,327		31,665			3,435			26,328		30,610		48,327
Net income	$	136,405	$	111,755		$	264,125	$	222,824		$	15,380		$	136,405	$	164,903	$	264,125

Earnings per share:
Basic	$	1.39	$	1.15		$	2.70	$	2.29		$	0.15		$	1.39	$	1.65	$	2.70
Diluted	1.39		1.14			2.69		2.28			0.15			1.39		1.64		2.69

Weighted average shares outstanding:
Basic	97,798		97,426			97,697		97,362			102,500			97,798		100,224		97,697
Diluted	98,170		97,866			98,137		97,908			102,605			98,170		100,466		98,137

Net income	$	136,405	$	111,755		$	264,125	$	222,824		$	15,380		$	136,405	$	164,903	$	264,125

Other comprehensive income (loss):
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments, net of tax expense (benefit) of $7,094 and ($1,418) in the three months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 and $15,045 and ($6,611) in the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018	35,987		(7,246		)	74,353		(35,996		)
Total other comprehensive income (loss)	35,987		(7,246		)	74,353		(35,996		)
Change in unrealized appreciation of investments, net of tax expense of $17,592 and $7,094 in the three months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019 and $10,613 and $15,045 in the six months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019											74,285			35,987		64,211		74,353
Total other comprehensive income											74,285			35,987		64,211		74,353
Comprehensive income	$	172,392	$	104,509		$	338,478	$	186,828		$	89,665		$	172,392	$	229,114	$	338,478

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

Essent Group Ltd. and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity (Unaudited)


Three Months Ended June 30, 2019	Common Shares				Additional Paid-In Capital				Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)				Retained Earnings			Treasury Stock			Total Stockholders’ Equity
												Three Months Ended June 30,										Six Months Ended June 30,
(In thousands)				Common Shares				Additional Paid-In Capital				Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)						Retained Earnings			Treasury Stock				Total Stockholders’ Equity			2020			2019			2020	2019
Balance at March 31, 2019
Net income																					136,405							136,405
Other comprehensive income										35,987										35,987
Common Shares
Balance, beginning of period																							$	1,479		$	1,475		$	1,476		$	1,472
Issuance of common shares																							207			—			207			—
Issuance of management incentive shares																							—			1			5			7
Cancellation of treasury stock																							—			—			(2		)	(3		)
Balance, end of period																							1,686			1,476			1,686			1,476

Additional Paid-In Capital
Balance, beginning of period																							1,117,286			1,106,797			1,118,655			1,110,800
Issuance of common shares, net of issuance costs of $18,875																							439,768			—			439,768			—
Dividends and dividend equivalents declared																							163			—			323			—
Issuance of management incentive shares	1				(1		)												—				—			(1		)	(5		)	(7		)
Stock-based compensation expense					4,222														4,222				4,568			4,222			9,348			8,322
Cancellation of treasury stock																							(48		)	(125		)	(6,352		)	(8,222		)
Balance, end of period																							1,561,737			1,110,893			1,561,737			1,110,893

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Balance, beginning of period																							46,113			9,373			56,187			(28,993		)
Other comprehensive income																							74,285			35,987			64,211			74,353
Balance, end of period																							120,398			45,360			120,398			45,360

Retained Earnings
Balance, beginning of period																							1,942,196			1,410,158			1,808,527			1,282,438
Net income																							15,380			136,405			164,903			264,125
Dividends and dividend equivalents declared																							(18,068		)	—			(33,922		)	—
Balance, end of period																							1,939,508			1,546,563			1,939,508			1,546,563

Treasury Stock
Balance, beginning of period																							—			—			—			—
Treasury stock acquired																(125		)	(125		)		(48		)	(125		)	(6,354		)	(8,225		)
Cancellation of treasury stock	—				(125		)									125			—				48			125			6,354			8,225
Balance at June 30, 2019	$	1,476			$	1,110,893			$	45,360			$	1,546,563		$	—		$	2,704,292
Balance, end of period																							—			—			—			—

Three Months Ended June 30, 2018	Common Shares				Additional Paid-In Capital				Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)				Retained Earnings			Treasury Stock			Total Stockholders’ Equity
(In thousands)
Balance at March 31, 2018				$		1,472						$			1,099,676								$	(32,002	)	$	926,144		$	—		$	1,995,290
Net income													111,755						111,755
Other comprehensive loss									(7,246		)								(7,246		)
Issuance of management incentive shares	—				—														—
Stock-based compensation expense					3,827														3,827
Treasury stock acquired																(55		)	(55		)
Cancellation of treasury stock	—				(55		)									55			—
Balance at June 30, 2018	$	1,472			$	1,103,448			$	(39,248	)		$	1,037,899		$	—		$	2,103,571

Six Months Ended June 30, 2019	Common Shares				Additional Paid-In Capital				Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)				Retained Earnings			Treasury Stock			Total Stockholders’ Equity
(In thousands)
Balance at December 31, 2018				$		1,472						$			1,110,800								$	(28,993	)	$	1,282,438		$	—		$	2,365,717
Net income													264,125						264,125
Other comprehensive income									74,353										74,353
Issuance of management incentive shares	7				(7		)												—
Stock-based compensation expense					8,322														8,322
Treasury stock acquired																(8,225		)	(8,225		)
Cancellation of treasury stock	(3		)		(8,222		)									8,225			—
Balance at June 30, 2019	$	1,476			$	1,110,893			$	45,360			$	1,546,563		$	—		$	2,704,292

Six Months Ended June 30, 2018	Common Shares				Additional Paid-In Capital				Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)				Retained Earnings			Treasury Stock			Total Stockholders’ Equity
(In thousands)
Balance at December 31, 2017				$		1,476						$			1,127,137								$	(3,252	)	$	815,075		$	—		$	1,940,436
Net income													222,824						222,824
Other comprehensive loss									(35,996		)								(35,996		)
Issuance of management incentive shares	6				(6		)												—
Stock-based compensation expense					7,432														7,432
Treasury stock acquired																(31,125		)	(31,125		)
Cancellation of treasury stock	(10		)		(31,115		)									31,125			—
Balance at June 30, 2018	$	1,472			$	1,103,448			$	(39,248	)		$	1,037,899		$	—		$	2,103,571
Total Stockholders' Equity																							$	3,623,329		$	2,704,292		$	3,623,329		$	2,704,292

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

Essent Group Ltd. and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)


	Six Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
(In thousands)	2019			2018			2020			2019
Operating Activities
Net income	$	264,125		$	222,824		$	164,903		$	264,125
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Gain on the sale of investments, net	(1,243		)	(636		)	(1,866		)	(1,243		)
Equity in net loss (income) of other invested assets	291			—			(228		)	291
Distribution of income from other invested assets							794			—
Depreciation and amortization	1,826			1,734			1,735			1,826
Stock-based compensation expense	8,322			7,432			9,348			8,322
Amortization of premium on investment securities	7,455			7,013			11,548			7,455
Deferred income tax provision	28,973			26,783			12,513			28,973
Change in:
Accrued investment income	(760		)	(2,848		)	(176		)	(760		)
Accounts receivable	(1,508		)	(3,174		)	1,238			(1,508		)
Deferred policy acquisition costs	219			(593		)	(151		)	219
Prepaid federal income tax	(28,000		)	77,822			(17,251		)	(28,000		)
Other assets	(7,832		)	(11,379		)	(7,622		)	(7,832		)
Reserve for losses and LAE	5,674			3,166			181,528			5,674
Unearned premium reserve	(233		)	24,113			(20,320		)	(233		)
Other accrued liabilities	(11,825		)	(9,601		)	9,792			(11,825		)
Net cash provided by operating activities	265,484			342,656			345,785			265,484

Investing Activities
Net change in short-term investments	(97,068		)	(14,317		)	(815,592		)	(97,068		)
Purchase of investments available for sale	(498,210		)	(505,400		)	(541,193		)	(498,210		)
Proceeds from maturity of investments available for sale	39,527			52,545			113,217			39,527
Proceeds from sales of investments available for sale	299,443			164,355			299,149			299,443
Purchase of other invested assets	(39,408		)	—			(6,618		)	(39,408		)
Return of investment from other invested assets	556			—			7,078			556
Purchase of property and equipment	(1,775		)	(2,050		)	(934		)	(1,775		)
Net cash used in investing activities	(296,935		)	(304,867		)	(944,893		)	(296,935		)

Financing Activities
Issuance of common shares, net of costs							440,498			—
Credit facility borrowings	—			15,000			200,000			—
Credit facility repayments	—			(40,000		)
Treasury stock acquired	(8,225		)	(31,125		)	(6,354		)	(8,225		)
Payment of issuance costs for credit facility	(15		)	(524		)	—			(15		)
Net cash used in financing activities	(8,240		)	(56,649		)
Dividends paid							(33,599		)	—
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities							600,545			(8,240		)

Net decrease in cash	(39,691		)	(18,860		)
Net increase (decrease) in cash							1,437			(39,691		)
Cash at beginning of year	64,946			43,524			71,350			64,946
Cash at end of period	$	25,255		$	24,664		$	72,787		$	25,255

Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information
Income tax payments	$	(21,005	)	$	(10,400	)	$	(10,000	)	$	(21,005	)
Interest payments	(5,179		)	(4,700		)	(4,283		)	(5,179		)

Noncash Transactions
Repayment of borrowings with term loan proceeds	$	—		$	(100,000	)
Lease liabilities arising from obtaining right-of-use assets	$	18		$	—		$	—		$	18

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

Essent Group Ltd. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

In these notes to condensed consolidated financial statements, “Essent”, “Company”, “we”, “us”, and “our” refer to Essent Group Ltd. and its subsidiaries, unless the context otherwise requires.

Note 1. Nature of Operations and Basis of Presentation

Essent Group Ltd. (“Essent Group”) is a Bermuda-based holding company, which, through its wholly-owned subsidiaries, offers private mortgage insurance and reinsurance for mortgages secured by residential properties located in the United States. Mortgage insurance facilitates the sale of low down payment (generally less than 20%) mortgage loans into the secondary mortgage market, primarily to two government-sponsored enterprises (“GSEs”), Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

The primary mortgage insurance operations are conducted through Essent Guaranty, Inc. (“Essent Guaranty”), a wholly-owned subsidiary approved as a qualified mortgage insurer by the GSEs and is licensed to write mortgage insurance in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. Essent Guaranty reinsures 25% of new insurance written to Essent Reinsurance Ltd. (“Essent Re”), an affiliated Bermuda domiciled Class 3A Insurer licensed pursuant to Section 4 of the Bermuda Insurance Act 1978 that provides insurance and reinsurance coverage of mortgage credit risk. Essent Re also provides insurance and reinsurance to Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae. In 2016, Essent Re formed Essent Agency (Bermuda) Ltd., a wholly-owned subsidiary, which provides underwriting consulting services to third-party reinsurers. In accordance with certain state law requirements then in effect, Essent Guaranty also reinsures that portion of the risk that is in excess of 25% of the mortgage balance with respect to loans insured prior to April 1, 2019, after consideration of other reinsurance, to Essent Guaranty of PA, Inc. (“Essent PA”), an affiliate.

In addition to offering mortgage insurance, we provide contract underwriting services on a limited basis through CUW Solutions, LLC ("CUW Solutions"), a Delaware limited liability company, that provides, among other things, mortgage contract underwriting services to lenders and mortgage insurance underwriting services to affiliates.

We have prepared the condensed consolidated financial statements included herein pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). We have condensed or omitted certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) pursuant to such rules and regulations. In the opinion of management, the statements include all adjustments (which include normal recurring adjustments) required for a fair statement of financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods presented. These statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto, including Note 1 and Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2018,~~2019, which discloses the principles of consolidation and a summary of significant accounting policies. The results of operations for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results for the full year. We evaluated the need to recognize or disclose events that occurred subsequent to June 30, ~~2019~~2020 prior to the issuance of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

Note 2. Recently Issued Accounting Standards

~~In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02,~~ ~~Leases (Topic 842)~~. This update requires organizations that lease assets to recognize on the balance sheet the assets and liabilities for the rights and obligations created by those leases. The new guidance also requires additional disclosures about the amount, timing and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases. The provisions of this update were effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2018. We adopted this standard on January 1, 2019 using the modified retrospective adoption approach for our existing operating leases at January 1, 2019. As permitted by this ASU, for leases that commenced before January 1, 2019 we elected the practical expedients of not reassessing whether any expired or existing contracts are or contain leases, not reassessing the lease classification for any expired or existing leases and not reassessing any initial direct costs for existing leases. In addition, we elected the practical expedient to use hindsight in determining the lease term. We also elected to recognize rent expense for short-term leases on a straight line basis over the lease term as permitted under this ASU. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material effect on the Company's consolidated operating results or financial position.Accounting Standards Adopted During 2020

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments (Topic 326). This update is intended to provide financial statement users with more information about the expected credit losses on financial instruments and other commitments to extend credit held by a reporting entity at each reporting date. The amendments in this ASU replace the incurred loss impairment methodology in current GAAP with a methodology that reflects expected credit

~~Table of Contents~~

~~Essent Group Ltd. and Subsidiaries~~

~~Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)~~

losses and requires consideration of a broader range of reasonable and supportable information to inform credit loss estimates. The new guidance requires financial assets measured at amortized cost to be presented at the net amount expected to be collected through the use of an allowance for credit losses. Credit losses relating to available-for-sale debt securities will also be recorded through an allowance rather than as a write-down of the amortized cost of the securities. The accounting for insurance losses and loss adjustment expenses ("LAE") are not within the scope of this ASU. The provisions of this update ~~are~~were effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, ~~2019. While~~2019 and we adopted this standard on January 1, 2020 using the ~~Company is still evaluating~~modified retrospective approach. The adoption of this ASU ~~we do~~did not ~~expect it~~have a material effect on the Company's consolidated operating results or financial position.

Table of Contents

Essent Group Ltd. and Subsidiaries

Notes to ~~impact our accounting for insurance losses and loss adjustment expenses ("LAE") as these items are not within the scope of this ASU.~~Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-13, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosure Framework - Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement. The amendments in this update modify the disclosure requirements for fair value measurements by removing, modifying, or adding certain disclosures. The provisions of this update ~~are~~were effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2019, with early adoption permitted for the removed disclosures. We adopted this standard on January 1, 2020. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements.

Accounting Standards Not Yet Adopted

In March 2020, the FASB issued ASU No. 2020-04, Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848): Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting. The amendments in this update provide temporary optional guidance to ease the potential burden in accounting for (or recognizing the effects of) reference rate reform. It provides optional expedients and exceptions for applying generally accepted accounting principles to contract, hedging relationships and other transactions affected by reference rate reform if certain criteria are met. The amendments in this update are effective as of March 12, 2020 through December 31, 2022. The Company is evaluating the impact the adoption of this ASU will have on ~~the consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.~~

~~In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-15,~~ ~~Intangibles - Goodwill and Other - Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That Is a Service Contract.~~ The amendments in this update align the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs associated with cloud computing arrangements hosted by a vendor with the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred to develop or obtain internal-use software. The provisions of this update are effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2019, with early adoption permitted. The Company has elected to adopt this ASU prospectively to eligible costs incurred effective January 1, 2019. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material effect on the Company’sour consolidated operating results orand financial position.

Table of Contents

Essent Group Ltd. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Note 3. Investments

Investments available for sale consist of the following:


June 30, 2019 (In thousands)	Amortized Cost		Unrealized Gains		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
June 30, 2020 (In thousands)										Amortized Cost		Unrealized Gains		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
U.S. Treasury securities	$	301,838	$	3,988	$	(674	)	$	305,152	$	248,140	$	11,120	$	(1	)	$	259,259
U.S. agency securities	33,632		21		(180		)	33,473		14,435		247		—			14,682
U.S. agency mortgage-backed securities	716,977		11,179		(3,774		)	724,382		791,142		39,048		(66		)	830,124
Municipal debt securities(1)	382,840		19,923		(48		)	402,715
Municipal debt securities (1)										436,386		29,068		(391		)	465,063
Non-U.S. government securities	45,070		2,600		—			47,670		50,710		4,069		(142		)	54,637
Corporate debt securities(2)	756,474		18,482		(450		)	774,506
Corporate debt securities (2)										862,027		50,939		(829		)	912,137
Residential and commercial mortgage securities	245,414		6,225		(846		)	250,793		300,021		15,170		(2,680		)	312,511
Asset-backed securities	352,729		872		(1,548		)	352,053		388,732		2,410		(5,656		)	385,486
Money market funds	209,466		4		—			209,470		1,118,213		1		(10		)	1,118,204
Total investments available for sale	$	3,044,440	$	63,294	$	(7,520	)	$	3,100,214	$	4,209,806	$	152,072	$	(9,775	)	$	4,352,103


December 31, 2018 (In thousands)	Amortized Cost		Unrealized Gains		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
December 31, 2019 (In thousands)										Amortized Cost		Unrealized Gains		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
U.S. Treasury securities	$	295,145	$	693	$	(5,946	)	$	289,892	$	239,087	$	3,526	$	(407	)	$	242,206
U.S. agency securities	33,645		—		(648		)	32,997		33,620		36		(51		)	33,605
U.S. agency mortgage-backed securities	649,228		2,520		(14,570		)	637,178		836,710		13,956		(2,332		)	848,334
Municipal debt securities(1)	481,547		5,351		(3,019		)	483,879
Municipal debt securities (1)										339,511		22,245		(118		)	361,638
Non-U.S. government securities	44,999		285		(283		)	45,001		52,230		2,812		(47		)	54,995
Corporate debt securities(2)	738,964		1,005		(14,768		)	725,201
Corporate debt securities (2)										856,638		24,255		(592		)	880,301
Residential and commercial mortgage securities	122,369		686		(1,217		)	121,838		282,840		6,542		(1,101		)	288,281
Asset-backed securities	288,371		305		(3,679		)	284,997		326,589		857		(1,421		)	326,025
Money market funds	139,082		1		—			139,083		315,360		2		—			315,362
Total investments available for sale	$	2,793,350	$	10,846	$	(44,130	)	$	2,760,066	$	3,282,585	$	74,231	$	(6,069	)	$	3,350,747


	June 30,		December 31,		June 30,		December 31,
(1) The following table summarizes municipal debt securities as of :	2019		2018		2020		2019
Special revenue bonds	70.1	%	69.0	%	74.3	%	74.5	%
General obligation bonds	24.7		26.0		22.2		21.3
Certificate of participation bonds	4.4		3.6		2.8		3.4
Tax allocation bonds	0.8		0.9		0.7		0.8
Special tax bonds	—		0.5
Total	100.0	%	100.0	%	100.0	%	100.0	%



	June 30,		December 31,
(2) The following table summarizes corporate debt securities as of :	2020		2019
Financial	35.0	%	34.4	%
Consumer, non-cyclical	20.8		20.1
Communications	10.9		10.3
Energy	7.6		8.3
Consumer, cyclical	7.2		7.6
Utilities	6.2		6.2
Technology	5.5		4.8
Industrial	3.5		4.2
Basic materials	3.3		4.1
Total	100.0	%	100.0	%

Table of Contents

Essent Group Ltd. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

June 30, December 31,
(2) The following table summarizes corporate debt securities as of : 2019 2018
Financial 35.9 % 37.1 %
Consumer, non-cyclical 21.4
20.7
Communications 11.4
12.6
Consumer, cyclical 7.1
7.6
Energy 6.3
5.7
Utilities 5.2
5.0
Industrial 4.9
4.7
Technology 4.5
3.1
Basic materials 3.3
3.5
Total 100.0 % 100.0 %

~~Table of Contents~~

~~Essent Group Ltd. and Subsidiaries~~

~~Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)~~

The amortized cost and fair value of investments available for sale at June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, by contractual maturity, are shown below. Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties. Because most U.S. agency mortgage-backed securities, residential and commercial mortgage securities and asset-backed securities provide for periodic payments throughout their lives, they are listed below in separate categories.


(In thousands)	Amortized Cost		Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Fair Value
U.S. Treasury securities:
Due in 1 year	$	59,252	$	59,187	$	83,842	$	84,360
Due after 1 but within 5 years	164,266		166,851		101,678		106,198
Due after 5 but within 10 years	78,320		79,114		61,636		67,516
Due after 10 years					984		1,185
Subtotal	301,838		305,152		248,140		259,259
U.S. agency securities:
Due in 1 year	19,191		19,082		1,897		1,914
Due after 1 but within 5 years	14,441		14,391		12,538		12,768
Subtotal	33,632		33,473		14,435		14,682
Municipal debt securities:
Due in 1 year	2,000		2,002		212		213
Due after 1 but within 5 years	54,384		55,625		39,539		41,489
Due after 5 but within 10 years	176,420		185,588		228,199		244,273
Due after 10 years	150,036		159,500		168,436		179,088
Subtotal	382,840		402,715		436,386		465,063
Non-U.S. government securities:
Due in 1 year	—		—		—		—
Due after 1 but within 5 years	19,821		20,613		22,258		23,589
Due after 5 but within 10 years	25,249		27,057		24,235		26,769
Due after 10 years					4,217		4,279
Subtotal	45,070		47,670		50,710		54,637
Corporate debt securities:
Due in 1 year	108,645		108,569		119,423		120,451
Due after 1 but within 5 years	403,824		410,788		456,301		479,892
Due after 5 but within 10 years	242,768		253,798		260,406		284,702
Due after 10 years	1,237		1,351		25,897		27,092
Subtotal	756,474		774,506		862,027		912,137
U.S. agency mortgage-backed securities	716,977		724,382		791,142		830,124
Residential and commercial mortgage securities	245,414		250,793		300,021		312,511
Asset-backed securities	352,729		352,053		388,732		385,486
Money market funds	209,466		209,470		1,118,213		1,118,204
Total investments available for sale	$	3,044,440	$	3,100,214	$	4,209,806	$	4,352,103

Gross gains and losses realized on the sale of investments available for sale were as follows:


	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,				Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
(In thousands)	2019		2018		2019		2018		2020		2019		2020		2019
Realized gross gains	$	1,923	$	518	$	2,594	$	1,309	$	1,263	$	1,923	$	4,525	$	2,594
Realized gross losses	1,225		79		1,236		673		2,103		1,225		2,230		1,236

Table of Contents

Essent Group Ltd. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

The fair value of investments available for sale in an unrealized loss position and the related unrealized losses for which no allowance for credit loss has been recorded were as follows:


	Less than 12 months					12 months or more					Total					Less than 12 months					12 months or more					Total
June 30, 2019 (In thousands)	Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses
June 30, 2020 (In thousands)																Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses
U.S. Treasury securities	$	41,998	$	(1	)	$	79,566	$	(673	)	$	121,564	$	(674	)	$	15,983	$	(1	)	$	—	$	—		$	15,983	$	(1	)
U.S. agency securities	—		—			27,374		(180		)	27,374		(180		)
U.S. agency mortgage-backed securities	15,672		(75		)	252,174		(3,699		)	267,846		(3,774		)	5,057		(30		)	1,677		(36		)	6,734		(66		)
Municipal debt securities	2,380		(24		)	2,459		(24		)	4,839		(48		)	32,488		(391		)	—		—			32,488		(391		)
Non-U.S. government securities																3,903		(142		)	—		—			3,903		(142		)
Corporate debt securities	11,733		(15		)	123,963		(435		)	135,696		(450		)	14,953		(829		)	—		—			14,953		(829		)
Residential and commercial mortgage securities	41,212		(626		)	8,368		(220		)	49,580		(846		)	50,165		(2,016		)	10,535		(664		)	60,700		(2,680		)
Asset-backed securities	133,870		(645		)	65,367		(903		)	199,237		(1,548		)	155,022		(2,974		)	74,305		(2,682		)	229,327		(5,656		)
Money market funds																65,010		(10		)	—		—			65,010		(10		)
Total	$	246,865	$	(1,386	)	$	559,271	$	(6,134	)	$	806,136	$	(7,520	)	$	342,581	$	(6,393	)	$	86,517	$	(3,382	)	$	429,098	$	(9,775	)


	Less than 12 months					12 months or more					Total					Less than 12 months					12 months or more					Total
December 31, 2018 (In thousands)	Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses
December 31, 2019 (In thousands)																Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses
U.S. Treasury securities	$	45,505	$	(215	)	$	165,015	$	(5,731	)	$	210,520	$	(5,946	)	$	29,013	$	(331	)	$	42,981	$	(76	)	$	71,994	$	(407	)
U.S. agency securities	—		—			32,997		(648		)	32,997		(648		)	—		—			25,605		(51		)	25,605		(51		)
U.S. agency mortgage-backed securities	106,177		(1,070		)	341,579		(13,500		)	447,756		(14,570		)	101,684		(1,042		)	113,866		(1,290		)	215,550		(2,332		)
Municipal debt securities	114,442		(1,176		)	104,930		(1,843		)	219,372		(3,019		)	10,651		(112		)	624		(6		)	11,275		(118		)
Non-U.S. government securities	13,497		(283		)	—		—			13,497		(283		)	9,664		(47		)	—		—			9,664		(47		)
Corporate debt securities	381,912		(7,538		)	231,124		(7,230		)	613,036		(14,768		)	83,013		(576		)	14,531		(16		)	97,544		(592		)
Residential and commercial mortgage securities	51,477		(650		)	13,321		(567		)	64,798		(1,217		)	59,341		(1,059		)	3,442		(42		)	62,783		(1,101		)
Asset-backed securities	217,546		(3,165		)	29,852		(514		)	247,398		(3,679		)	78,813		(202		)	109,536		(1,219		)	188,349		(1,421		)
Total	$	930,556	$	(14,097	)	$	918,818	$	(30,033	)	$	1,849,374	$	(44,130	)	$	372,179	$	(3,369	)	$	310,585	$	(2,700	)	$	682,764	$	(6,069	)

~~The gross unrealized losses on these~~At June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, we held 274 and 365 individual investment securities, ~~are principally associated with the changes~~respectively, that were in ~~market interest rates as well as changes in credit spreads subsequent to their purchase. Each issuer is current on its scheduled interest and principal payments.~~an unrealized loss position. We assess our intent to sell these securities and whether we will be required to sell these securities before the recovery of their amortized cost basis when determining whether to record an impairment ~~is other-than-temporary.~~on the securities in an unrealized loss position. In assessing whether the decline in the fair value at June 30, 2020 of any of these securities resulted from a credit loss or other factors, we made inquiries of our investment managers to determine that each issuer was current on its scheduled interest and principal payments. We reviewed the credit rating of these securities noting that over 98% of the securities at June 30, 2020 had investment-grade ratings. We concluded that gross unrealized losses noted above are principally associated with the changes in credit spreads subsequent to purchase rather than due to credit impairment. We recorded animpairments of $0.4 million in the three and six months ended June 30, 2020 and other-than-temporary ~~impairment~~impairments of $0.1 million in the three and six months ended June 30, 2019 on securities in an unrealized loss position. The ~~impairment~~impairments resulted from our intent to sell the ~~security~~securities subsequent to the reporting date. ~~There were no other-than-temporary impairments in each of the three and six months ended June 30, 2018.~~

The Company's other invested assets at June 30, ~~2019~~2020 and December 31, ~~2018~~2019 totaled ~~$69.9~~$78.5 million and ~~$31.0~~$78.9 million, respectively. Other invested assets are comprised of limited partnership interests which are generally accounted for under the equity method of accounting with changes in value reported in other income. Due to the timing of receiving financial information from these partnerships, the results are generally reported on a one month or quarter lag.

The fair value of investments deposited with insurance regulatory authorities to meet statutory requirements was ~~$9.4~~$9.9 million at June 30, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~$8.9~~$9.4 million at December 31, ~~2018.~~2019. In connection with its insurance and reinsurance activities,

Table of Contents

Essent Group Ltd. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Essent Re is required to maintain assets in trusts for the benefit of its contractual counterparties. The fair value of the investments on deposit in these trusts was ~~$687.7~~$979.8 million at June 30, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~$759.9~~$805.5 million at December 31, ~~2018.~~2019. Essent Guaranty is required to maintain assets on deposit in connection with its fully collateralized reinsurance agreements (see Note 4). The fair value of the assets on deposit was ~~$8.2~~$8.5 million at June 30, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~$3.4~~$6.4 million at December 31, ~~2018.~~2019. Essent Guaranty is also required to maintain assets on deposit for the benefit of the sponsor of a fixed income investment commitment. The fair value of the assets on deposit was ~~$6.4~~$12.0 million at June 30, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~$6.3~~$6.4 million at December 31, ~~2018.~~2019.

~~Table of Contents~~

~~Essent Group Ltd. and Subsidiaries~~

~~Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)~~

Net investment income consists of:


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,						Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
(In thousands)	2019			2018			2019			2018			2020			2019			2020			2019
Fixed maturities	$	20,180		$	14,496		$	39,923		$	28,139		$	20,569		$	20,180		$	41,183		$	39,923
Short-term investments	1,310			1,298			2,368			2,049			358			1,310			1,480			2,368
Gross investment income	21,490			15,794			42,291			30,188			20,927			21,490			42,663			42,291
Investment expenses	(909		)	(660		)	(1,830		)	(1,340		)	(1,061		)	(909		)	(2,164		)	(1,830		)
Net investment income	$	20,581		$	15,134		$	40,461		$	28,848		$	19,866		$	20,581		$	40,499		$	40,461

Note 4. Reinsurance

In the ordinary course of business, our insurance subsidiaries may use reinsurance to provide protection against adverse loss experience and to expand our capital sources. Reinsurance recoverables are recorded as assets and included in other assets on our condensed consolidated balance sheets, predicated on a reinsurer's ability to meet their obligations under the reinsurance agreements. If the reinsurers are unable to satisfy their obligations under the agreements, our insurance subsidiaries would be liable for such defaulted amounts.

The effect of reinsurance on net premiums written and earned is as follows:



	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
(In thousands)	2020			2019			2020			2019
Net premiums written:
Direct	$	228,044		$	196,832		$	434,024		$	380,514
Ceded (1)	(22,140		)	(8,428		)	(36,377		)	(14,466		)
Net premiums written	$	205,904		$	188,404		$	397,647		$	366,048

Net premiums earned:
Direct	$	233,611		$	196,918		$	454,344		$	380,747
Ceded (1)	(22,140		)	(8,428		)	(36,377		)	(14,466		)
Net premiums earned	$	211,471		$	188,490		$	417,967		$	366,281


(1)	Net of profit commission.

Quota Share Reinsurance

Effective September 1, 2019, Essent Guaranty entered into a quota share reinsurance agreement with a panel of third-party reinsurers (the "QSR Agreement"). Each of the third-party reinsurers has an insurer financial strength rating of A or better by S&P Global Ratings, A.M. Best or both. Under the QSR Agreement, Essent Guaranty will cede premiums earned related to 40% of risk on eligible single premium policies and 20% of risk on all other eligible policies written September 1, 2019 through December 31, 2020, in exchange for reimbursement of ceded claims and claims expenses on covered policies, a 20% ceding commission, and a profit commission of up to 60% that varies directly and inversely with ceded claims. The QSR Agreement is scheduled to terminate on December 31, 2030. Essent Guaranty has certain termination rights under the QSR Agreement, including the option to terminate the QSR Agreement with no termination fee on December 31, 2021, and the option, subject to

Table of Contents

Essent Group Ltd. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

a termination fee, to terminate the QSR Agreement on December 31, 2022, or annually thereafter. Should Essent Guaranty not exercise its option to terminate the QSR Agreement on December 31, 2021, the maximum profit commission that Essent Guaranty could earn would increase to 63% in 2022 and thereafter. RIF ceded under the QSR Agreement was $3.3 billion as of June 30, 2020.

Excess of Loss Reinsurance

Essent Guaranty has entered into fully collateralized reinsurance agreements ("Radnor Re Transactions") with unaffiliated special purpose insurers domiciled in ~~Bermuda ("Radnor Re Transactions").~~Bermuda. For the reinsurance coverage periods, Essent Guaranty and its affiliates retain the first layer of the respective aggregate losses, and a Radnor Re special purpose insurer will then provide second layer coverage up to the outstanding reinsurance coverage amount. Essent Guaranty and its affiliates retain losses in excess of the outstanding reinsurance coverage amount. The reinsurance premium due to each Radnor Re special purpose insurer is calculated by multiplying the outstanding reinsurance coverage amount at the beginning of a period by a coupon rate, which is the sum of one-month LIBOR plus a risk margin, and then subtracting actual investment income collected on the assets in the related reinsurance trust during that period. The aggregate excess of loss reinsurance coverage decreases over a ten-year period as the underlying covered mortgages amortize. Essent Guaranty has rights to terminate the Radnor Re Transactions. The Radnor Re entities collateralized the coverage by issuing mortgage insurance-linked notes ("ILNs") in an aggregate amount equal to the initial coverage to unaffiliated investors. The notes have ten-year legal maturities and are non-recourse to any assets of Essent Guaranty or its affiliates. The proceeds of the notes were deposited into reinsurance trusts for the benefit of Essent Guaranty and will be the source of reinsurance claim payments to Essent Guaranty and principal repayments on the ILNs.

Essent Guaranty has also entered into reinsurance agreements with panels of reinsurers that provide aggregate excess of loss coverage immediately above or pari-passu to the coverage provided by the Radnor Re Transactions. The aggregate excess of loss reinsurance coverage decreases over a ten-year period as the underlying covered mortgages amortize. Essent Guaranty has rights to terminate these reinsurance agreements.

~~Table of Contents~~

~~Essent Group Ltd. and Subsidiaries~~

~~Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)~~

The following ~~tables~~table summarizes Essent Guaranty's excess of loss reinsurance agreements ~~respective coverages and retentions~~ as of June 30, ~~2019:~~2020:

Vintage Year

Reinsurer

Effective Date

Optional Termination Date

Reinsurer

Effective Date

Optional Termination Date

2015 & 2016

Radnor Re 2019-2 Ltd.

June 20, 2019

June 25, 2024

Radnor Re 2019-2 Ltd.

June 20, 2019

June 25, 2024

2017

Radnor Re 2018-1 Ltd.

March 22, 2018

March 25, 2023

(1)

Radnor Re 2018-1 Ltd.

March 22, 2018

March 25, 2023

(1)

2017

Panel of Reinsurers

November 1, 2018

October 1, 2023

(2)

Panel of Reinsurers

November 1, 2018

October 1, 2023

(2)

2018

Radnor Re 2019-1 Ltd.

February 28, 2019

February 25, 2026

Radnor Re 2019-1 Ltd.

February 28, 2019

February 25, 2026

2018

Panel of Reinsurers

February 28, 2019

February 25, 2026

Panel of Reinsurers

February 28, 2019

February 25, 2026

2019

Radnor Re 2020-1 Ltd.

January 30, 2020

January 25, 2027

2019

Panel of Reinsurers

January 30, 2020

January 25, 2027


(1)	If the reinsurance agreement is not terminated at the optional termination date, the risk margin component of the reinsurance premium increases by 50%.


(2)	If the reinsurance agreement is not terminated at the optional termination date, the reinsurance premium increases by 50%.

Table of Contents

Essent Group Ltd. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

The following table summarizes Essent Guaranty's excess of loss reinsurance coverages and retentions as of June 30, 2020:


(In thousands)					Remaining Reinsurance in Force													Remaining Reinsurance in Force
Vintage Year	Remaining Insurance in Force		Remaining Risk in Force		ILN		Other Reinsurance			Total		Remaining First Layer Retention		Remaining Insurance in Force		Remaining Risk in Force		ILN		Other Reinsurance			Total		Remaining First Layer Retention
2015 & 2016	$	30,826,843	$	8,331,331	$	333,844	$	—		$	333,844	$	208,111	$	22,315,283	$	6,025,734	$	216,480	$	—		$	216,480	$	207,849
2017	33,789,568		8,468,723		405,558		165,167		(3)	570,725		224,017		22,597,869		5,742,641		242,123		165,167		(4)	407,290		220,308
2018	41,985,709		10,531,739		473,184		118,650		(4)	591,834		253,643		26,393,162		6,676,437		325,537		76,144		(5)	401,681		252,392
2019 (3)														30,475,038		7,724,225		495,889		55,102		(6)	550,991		215,605
Total	$	106,602,120	$	27,331,793	$	1,212,586	$	283,817		$	1,496,403	$	685,771	$	101,781,352	$	26,169,037	$	1,280,029	$	296,413		$	1,576,442	$	896,154


(3)	Reinsurance coverage on new insurance written from January 1, 2019 through August 31, 2019.


(4)	Coverage provided immediately above the coverage provided by Radnor Re 2018-1 Ltd.


~~(4)~~(5)	Coverage provided pari-passu to the coverage provided by Radnor Re 2019-1 Ltd.


(6)	Coverage provided pari-passu to the coverage provided by Radnor Re 2020-1 Ltd.

Based on the level of delinquencies reported to us, the ILN transactions listed above became subject to a "trigger event" as of June 25, 2020. The ~~effect~~amortization of principal of the notes issued by the unaffiliated special purpose insurers in connection with the ILNs is suspended and the aggregate excess of loss reinsurance ~~on net premiums written and earned is as follows:~~

Three Months Ended
June 30, Six Months Ended
June 30,
(In thousands) 2019 2018 2019 2018
Net premiums written:
Direct $ 196,832
$ 171,989
$ 380,514
$ 337,508
Ceded (8,428 ) (3,585 ) (14,466 ) (3,879 )
Net premiums written $ 188,404
$ 168,404
$ 366,048
$ 333,629

Net premiums earned:
Direct $ 196,918
$ 160,543
$ 380,747
$ 313,395
Ceded (8,428 ) (3,585 ) (14,466 ) (3,879 )
Net premiums earned $ 188,490
$ 156,958
$ 366,281
$ 309,516

coverage will not amortize during the continuation of a trigger event.

The amount of monthly reinsurance premium ceded to the Radnor Re entities will fluctuate due to changes in one-month LIBOR and changes in money market rates that affect investment income collected on the assets in the reinsurance trusts. As the reinsurance premium will vary based on changes in these rates, we concluded that the Radnor Re Transactions contain embedded derivatives that will be accounted for separately like freestanding derivatives.

In connection with the Radnor Re Transactions, we concluded that the risk transfer requirements for reinsurance accounting were met as each Radnor Re entity is assuming significant insurance risk and a reasonable possibility of a

~~Table of Contents~~

~~Essent Group Ltd. and Subsidiaries~~

~~Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)~~

significant loss. In addition, we assessed whether each Radnor Re entity was a variable interest entity ("VIE") and the appropriate accounting for the Radnor Re entities if they were VIEs. A VIE is a legal entity that does not have sufficient equity at risk to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support or is structured such that equity investors lack the ability to make significant decisions relating to the entity’s operations through voting rights or do not substantively participate in the gains and losses of the entity. A VIE is consolidated by its primary beneficiary. The primary beneficiary is the entity that has both (1) the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly affect the entity’s economic performance and (2) the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits that could be potentially significant to the VIE. While also considering these factors, the consolidation conclusion depends on the breadth of the decision-making ability and ability to influence activities that significantly affect the economic performance of the VIE. We concluded that the Radnor Re entities are VIEs. However, given that Essent Guaranty (1) does not have the unilateral power to direct the activities that most significantly affect their economic performance and (2) does not have the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits that could be potentially significant to these entities, the Radnor Re entities are not consolidated in these financial statements.

Table of Contents

Essent Group Ltd. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

The following table presents total assets of each Radnor Re special purpose insurer as well as our maximum exposure to loss associated with each Radnor Re entity, representing the fair value of the embedded derivative included in other assets (other accrued liabilities) on our condensed consolidated balance sheet and the estimated net present value of investment earnings on the assets in the reinsurance trust, each as of June 30, ~~2019:~~2020:


			Maximum Exposure to Loss								Maximum Exposure to Loss
(In thousands)	Total VIE Assets		On - Balance Sheet		Off - Balance Sheet		Total		Total VIE Assets		On - Balance Sheet			Off - Balance Sheet		Total
Radnor Re 2018-1 Ltd.	$	405,558	$	1,727	$	15,997	$	17,724	$	242,123	$	573		$	132	$	705
Radnor Re 2019-1 Ltd.	473,184		825		25,131		25,956		325,537		(1,858		)	307		(1,551		)
Radnor Re 2019-2 Ltd.	333,844		32		16,242		16,274		216,480		(1,409		)	172		(1,237		)
Radnor Re 2020-1 Ltd.									495,889		(765		)	503		(262		)
Total	$	1,212,586	$	2,584	$	57,370	$	59,954	$	1,280,029	$	(3,459	)	$	1,114	$	(2,345	)

Note 5. Reserve for Losses and Loss Adjustment Expenses

The following table provides a reconciliation of the beginning and ending reserve balances for losses and loss adjustment expenses (“LAE”) for the six months ended June 30:


($ in thousands)	2019			2018			2020			2019
Reserve for losses and LAE at beginning of period	$	49,464		$	46,850		$	69,362		$	49,464
Less: Reinsurance recoverables	—			—			71			—
Net reserve for losses and LAE at beginning of period	49,464			46,850			69,291			49,464
Add provision for losses and LAE, net of reinsurance, occurring in:
Current period	23,182			16,528			197,195			23,182
Prior years	(11,115		)	(9,406		)	(13,255		)	(11,115		)
Net incurred losses and LAE during the current period	12,067			7,122			183,940			12,067
Deduct payments for losses and LAE, net of reinsurance, occurring in:
Current period	245			211			289			245
Prior years	6,148			3,745			9,813			6,148
Net loss and LAE payments during the current period	6,393			3,956			10,102			6,393
Net reserve for losses and LAE at end of period	55,138			50,016			243,129			55,138
Plus: Reinsurance recoverables	—			—			7,761			—
Reserve for losses and LAE at end of period	$	55,138		$	50,016		$	250,890		$	55,138

Loans in default at end of period	4,405			3,519			38,068			4,405

~~Table~~For the six months ended June 30, 2020, $9.8 million was paid for incurred claims and claim adjustment expenses attributable to insured events of ~~Contents~~

~~Essent Group Ltd.~~prior years. There has been a $13.3 million favorable prior year development during the six months ended June 30, 2020. Reserves remaining as of June 30, 2020 for prior years are $46.2 million as a result of re-estimation of unpaid losses and ~~Subsidiaries~~

~~Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)~~

loss adjustment expenses. For the six months ended June 30, 2019, $6.1 million was paid for incurred claims and claim adjustment expenses attributable to insured events of prior years. There ~~has been~~was a $11.1 million favorable prior year development during the six months ended June 30, 2019. Reserves remaining as of June 30, 2019 for prior years ~~are~~were $32.2 million as a result of re-estimation of unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses. For the six months ended June 30, 2018, $3.7 million was paid for incurred claims and claim adjustment expenses attributable to insured events of prior years. There was a $9.4 million favorable prior year development during the six months ended June 30, 2018. Reserves remaining as of June 30, 2018 for prior years were $33.7 million as a result of re-estimation of unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses. In both periods, the favorable prior years' loss development was the result of a re-estimation of amounts ultimately to be paid on prior year defaults in the default inventory, including the impact of previously identified defaults that cured. Original estimates are increased or decreased as additional information becomes known regarding individual claims.

Due to business restrictions, stay-at-home orders and travel restrictions initially implemented in March 2020 as a result of COVID-19, unemployment in the United States has increased significantly. As unemployment is one of the most common reasons for borrowers to default on their mortgage, the increase in unemployment has increased the number of delinquencies on

Table of Contents

Essent Group Ltd. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

the mortgages that we insure and has the potential to increase claim frequencies on defaults. As of June 30, 2020, insured loans in default totaled 38,068 and included 34,352 defaults classified as COVID-19 defaults. For borrowers that have the ability to begin to pay their mortgage at the end of the forbearance period, we expect that mortgage servicers will work with them to modify their loans at which time the mortgage will be removed from delinquency status. We believe that the forbearance process could have a favorable effect on the frequency of claims that we ultimately pay. Based on the forbearance programs in place and the credit characteristics of the COVID-19 defaulted loans, we expect the ultimate number of COVID-19-related defaults that result in claims will be less than our historical default-to-claim experience. Accordingly, we recorded a reserve equal to approximately 7% of the risk in force for the COVID-19 default notices received in the three months ended June 30, 2020, compared to approximately a 9% reserve estimate for defaults that had missed three payments or less as of December 31, 2019. The reserve for losses and LAE on COVID-19 defaults was $189.0 million at June 30, 2020. It is reasonably possible that our estimate of the losses for the COVID-19 defaults could change in the near term as a result of the continued impact of the pandemic on the economic environment, the results of existing and future governmental programs designed to assist individuals and businesses impacted by the virus and the performance of the COVID-19 defaults in the forbearance programs. A 100 basis point increase or decrease in the reserve rate applied to COVID-19 new default notices would result in a corresponding increase or decrease in our reserve for loss and LAE of approximately $26 million as of June 30, 2020. The impact on our reserves in future periods will be dependent upon the amount of delinquent notices received from loan servicers, the performance of COVID-19 defaults and our expectations for the amount of ultimate losses on these delinquencies.

Note 6. Debt Obligations

Credit Facility

Essent Group and its subsidiaries, Essent Irish Intermediate Holdings Limited and Essent US Holdings, Inc. (collectively, the "Borrowers"), are parties to a secured credit facility (the “Credit Facility”) with committed capacity of $500 million. The Credit Facility provides for a $275 million revolving credit facility, $225 million of term loans and a $100 million uncommitted line that may be exercised at the Borrowers’ option so long as the Borrowers receive commitments from the lenders. Borrowings under the Credit Facility may be used for working capital and general corporate purposes, including, without limitation, capital contributions to Essent’s insurance and reinsurance subsidiaries. Borrowings accrue interest at a floating rate tied to a standard short-term borrowing index, selected at the Company’s option, plus an applicable margin. A commitment fee is due quarterly on the average daily amount of the undrawn revolving commitment. The applicable margin and the commitment fee are based on the senior unsecured debt rating or long-term issuer rating of Essent Group to the extent available, or the insurer financial strength rating of Essent Guaranty. The ~~current~~ annual commitment fee rate ~~is 0.35%~~at June 30, 2020 was 0.25%. The obligations under the Credit Facility are secured by certain assets of the Borrowers, excluding the stock and assets of its insurance and reinsurance subsidiaries. The Credit Facility contains several covenants, including financial covenants relating to minimum net worth, capital and liquidity levels, maximum debt to capitalization level and Essent Guaranty's compliance with the PMIERs (see Note 1215). The borrowings under the Credit Facility contractually mature on May 17, 2021. ~~This description is not intended to be complete in all respects and is qualified in its entirety by the terms of the Credit Facility, including its covenants.~~ As of June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, the Company was in compliance with the covenants and ~~$225~~$425 million had been borrowed under the Credit Facility with a weighted average interest rate of ~~4.41%~~1.93%. As of December 31, ~~2018,~~2019, $225 million had been borrowed with a weighted average interest rate of ~~4.43%~~3.51%.

Note 7. Commitments and Contingencies

Obligations under Guarantees

Under the terms of CUW Solutions' contract underwriting agreements with lenders and subject to contractual limitations on liability, we agree to indemnify certain lenders against losses incurred in the event that we make an error in determining whether loans processed meet specified underwriting criteria, to the extent that such error materially restricts or impairs the salability of such loan, results in a material reduction in the value of such loan or results in the lender repurchasing the loan. The indemnification may be in the form of monetary or other remedies. We paid less than $0.1 million related to remedies for each of the six months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, ~~and 2018.~~respectively. As of June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, management believes any potential claims for indemnification related to contract underwriting services through June 30, ~~2019~~2020 are not material to our consolidated financial position or results of operations.

In addition to the indemnifications discussed above, in the normal course of business, we enter into agreements or other relationships with third parties pursuant to which we may be obligated under specified circumstances to indemnify the counterparties with respect to certain matters. Our contractual indemnification obligations typically arise in the context of

Table of Contents

Essent Group Ltd. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

agreements entered into by us to, among other things, purchase or sell services, finance our business and business transactions, lease real property and license intellectual property. The agreements we enter into in the normal course of business generally require us to pay certain amounts to the other party associated with claims or losses if they result from our breach of the agreement, including the inaccuracy of representations or warranties. The agreements we enter into may also contain other indemnification provisions that obligate us to pay amounts upon the occurrence of certain events, such as the negligence or willful misconduct of our employees, infringement of third-party intellectual property rights or claims that performance of the

~~Table of Contents~~

~~Essent Group Ltd. and Subsidiaries~~

~~Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)~~

agreement constitutes a violation of law. Generally, payment by us under an indemnification provision is conditioned upon the other party making a claim, and typically we can challenge the other party’s claims. Further, our indemnification obligations may be limited in time and/or amount, and in some instances, we may have recourse against third parties for certain payments made by us under an indemnification agreement or obligation. As of June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, contingencies triggering material indemnification obligations or payments have not occurred historically and are not expected to occur. The nature of the indemnification provisions in the various types of agreements and relationships described above are believed to be low risk and pervasive, and we consider them to have a remote risk of loss or payment. We have not recorded any provisions on the condensed consolidated balance sheets related to indemnifications.

Commitments

We lease office space for use in our operations under leases accounted for as operating leases. These leases generally include options to extend them for periods of up to ten years. Our option to extend the term of our primary office locations at the greater of existing or prevailing market rates was not recognized in our right-of-use asset and lease liability. When establishing the value of our right-of-use asset and lease liability, we determine the discount rate for the underlying leases using the prevailing market interest rate for a borrowing of the same duration of the lease plus the risk premium inherent in the borrowings under our Credit Facility. ~~Right-of-use~~Operating lease right-of-use assets of $9.0 million and ~~lease liabilities~~$10.0 million as of June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively, are reported on ~~the~~our condensed consolidated balance sheet as property and ~~equipment~~equipment. Operating lease liabilities of $11.3 million and $12.6 million as of June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively, are reported on our condensed consolidated balance sheet as other accrued ~~liabilities, respectively.~~liabilities. Total rent expense was $0.6 million for each of the three months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019 and $1.2 million for each of the six months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019.

The following table presents lease cost for the three and six months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019 and other lease information ~~as of~~at June 30, 2020 and 2019:

Six Months Ended
June 30,
($ in thousands) 2019
Lease cost:
Operating lease cost $ 1,197
Short-term lease cost 81
Sublease income (64 )
Total lease cost $ 1,214

Other information:
Weighted average remaining lease term - operating leases 5.3 years
Weighted average discount rate - operating leases 4.1 %

~~The following table presents a maturity analysis of our lease liabilities as follows at June 30, 2019:~~

(In thousands)
2019 (July 1 through December 31) $ 1,330
2020 2,637
2021 2,657
2022 2,711
2023 2,553
2024 and thereafter 1,963
Total lease payments to be paid 13,851
Less: Future interest expense (1,454 )
Present value of lease liabilities $ 12,397



	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
($ in thousands)	2020			2019			2020			2019
Lease cost:
Operating lease cost	$	601		$	606		$	1,301		$	1,197
Short-term lease cost	5			39			10			81
Sublease income	(33		)	(32		)	(66		)	(64		)
Total lease cost	$	573		$	613		$	1,245		$	1,214

Other information:
Weighted average remaining lease term - operating leases							4.3 years			5.3 years
Weighted average discount rate - operating leases							4.0		%	4.1		%

Table of Contents

Essent Group Ltd. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

The ~~future minimum~~following table presents a maturity analysis of our lease ~~payments of non-cancelable operating leases are~~liabilities as follows at ~~December 31, 2018:~~June 30, 2020:

Year Ended December 31 (In thousands)
2019 $ 2,674
2020 2,628
2021 2,657
2022 2,711
2023 2,553
2024 and thereafter 1,963
Total minimum payments required $ 15,186



(In thousands)
2020 (July 1 through December 31)	$	1,490
2021	2,999
2022	3,003
2023	2,752
2024	1,334
2025 and thereafter	793
Total lease payments to be paid	12,371
Less: Future interest expense	(1,055		)
Present value of lease liabilities	$	11,316

~~Minimum lease payments shown above~~

Note 8. Capital Stock

Our authorized share capital consists of 233.3 million shares of a single class of common shares. The common shares have ~~not been~~no pre-emptive rights or other rights to subscribe for additional shares, and no rights of redemption, conversion or exchange. Under certain circumstances and subject to the provisions of Bermuda law and our bye-laws, we may be required to make an offer to repurchase shares held by members. The common shares rank pari-passu with one another in all respects as to rights of payment and distribution. In general, holders of common shares will have 1 vote for each common share held by them and will be entitled to vote, on a non-cumulative basis, at all meetings of shareholders. In the event that a shareholder is considered a 9.5% Shareholder under our bye-laws, such shareholder's votes will be reduced by ~~minimum sublease rental income~~whatever amount is necessary so that after any such reduction the votes of ~~$0.1~~such shareholder will not result in any other person being treated as a 9.5% Shareholder with respect to the vote on such matter. Under these provisions certain shareholders may have their voting rights limited to less than one vote per share, while other shareholders may have voting rights in excess of 1 vote per share.

In June 2020, Essent Group completed the sale of 13.8 million ~~due~~common shares in ~~2019 under~~a public offering at a price of $33.25 per share. The total net proceeds from this offering were approximately $440.0 million after deducting underwriting discounts, commissions and other offering expenses.

Dividends

In February 2020, the ~~non-cancelable sublease.~~ Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.16 per common share which was paid on March 20, 2020. In May 2020, the Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.16 per common share which was paid on June 12, 2020. In August 2020, the Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.16 per common share payable on September 10, 2020, to shareholders of record on August 31, 2020.

Note 89. Stock-Based Compensation

In connection with the IPO in 2013, Essent Group's Board of Directors adopted, and Essent Group's shareholders approved, the Essent Group Ltd. 2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the "2013 Plan"), which was effective upon completion of the initial public offering. The types of awards available under the 2013 Plan include nonvested shares, nonvested share units, non-qualified share options, incentive stock options, share appreciation rights, and other share-based or cash-based awards. Nonvested shares and nonvested share units granted under the 2013 Plan have rights to dividends, which entitle holders to the same dividend value per share as holders of common shares in the form of dividend equivalent units ("DEUs"). DEUs are subject to the same vesting and other terms and conditions as the corresponding nonvested shares and nonvested share units. DEUs vest when the underlying shares or share units vest and are forfeited if the underlying share or share units forfeit prior to vesting.

Table of Contents

Essent Group Ltd. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

The following table summarizes nonvested common share, ~~and~~ nonvested common share unit and DEU activity for the six months ended June 30, ~~2019:~~2020:


	Time and Performance- Based Share Awards				Time-Based Share Awards				Share Units				Time and Performance- Based Share Awards				Time-Based Share Awards				Share Units				DEUs
(Shares in thousands)	Number of Shares		Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value		Number of Shares		Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value		Number of Share Units		Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value		Number of Shares		Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value		Number of Shares		Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value		Number of Share Units		Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value		Dividend Equivalent Units		Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
Outstanding at beginning of year	482		$	29.49	207		$	32.82	449		$	34.35	394		$	42.02	169		$	41.31	351		$	39.78	5		$	51.11
Granted	141		45.32		90		40.98		142		42.07		109		51.52		69		51.52		350		48.75		10		31.38
Vested	(209	)	17.01		(123	)	27.48		(218	)	31.27		(140	)	36.29		(85	)	40.47		(192	)	37.76		(2	)	49.79
Forfeited	—		N/A		—		N/A		(8	)	35.50		—		N/A		—		N/A		(12	)	49.70		—		34.46
Outstanding at June 30, 2019	414		$	41.18	174		$	40.83	365		$	39.17
Outstanding at June 30, 2020													363		$	47.09	153		$	46.34	497		$	46.64	13		$	35.83

In February ~~2019,~~2020, certain members of senior management were granted nonvested common shares under the Essent Group Ltd. 2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan ("2013 Plan") that were subject to time-based and performance-based vesting. ~~These~~The time-based share awards granted in February 2020 vest in three equal installments on March 1, ~~2020,~~ 2021, 2022 and ~~2022. In March 2019, certain members of senior management were granted nonvested common shares under the 2013 Plan that were subject to performance-based vesting.~~2023. The performance-based share awards granted in February 2020 vest based upon our compounded annual book value per share growth percentage during a three-year performance period that commenced on January 1, ~~2019~~2020 and vest on March 1, ~~2022.~~2023. The portion of these nonvested performance-based share awards that will be earned based upon the achievement of compounded annual book value per share growth is as follows:


Performance level	Compounded Annual Book Value Per Share Growth		Nonvested Common Shares Earned		Compounded Annual Book Value Per Share Growth		Nonvested Common Shares Earned
	<14	%	0	%	<13	%	0	%
Threshold	14	%	10	%	13	%	10	%
	15	%	35	%	14	%	35	%
	16	%	60	%	15	%	60	%
	17	%	85	%	16	%	85	%
Maximum	≥18	%	100	%	≥17	%	100	%

In the event that the compounded annual book value per share growth falls between the performance levels shown above, the nonvested common shares earned will be determined on a straight-line basis between the respective levels shown.

~~Table of Contents~~

~~Essent Group Ltd.~~In January 2020, time-based share units were issued to all vice president and ~~Subsidiaries~~

~~Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)~~

staff level employees and vest in three equal installments on January 2021, 2022 and 2023. In connection with our incentive program covering bonus awards for performance year ~~2018,~~2019, in February ~~2019,~~2020, time-based share units were issued to certain employees that vest in three equal installments on March 1, ~~2020,~~ 2021, 2022 and ~~2022.~~2023. In May ~~2019,~~2020, time-based share units were granted to non-employee directors that vest one year from the date of grant.

The total fair value on the vesting date of nonvested shares, or share units or DEUs that vested was ~~$23.6~~$18.5 million and ~~$74.9~~$23.6 million for the six months ended June 30, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018,~~2019, respectively. As of June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, there was ~~$25.6~~$33.6 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to nonvested shares or share units outstanding at June 30, ~~2019~~2020 and we expect to recognize the expense over a weighted average period of 2.2 years.

Employees have the option to tender shares to Essent Group to pay the minimum employee statutory withholding taxes associated with shares upon vesting. Common shares tendered by employees to pay employee withholding taxes totaled ~~192,674~~141,801 in the six months ended June 30, ~~2019.~~2020. The tendered shares were recorded at cost and included in treasury stock. All treasury stock has been cancelled as of June 30, ~~2019.~~2020.

Table of Contents

Essent Group Ltd. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Compensation expense, net of forfeitures, and related tax effects recognized in connection with nonvested shares was as follows:


	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,				Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
(In thousands)	2019		2018		2019		2018		2020		2019		2020		2019
Compensation expense	$	4,222	$	3,827	$	8,322	$	7,432	$	4,568	$	4,222	$	9,348	$	8,322
Income tax benefit	790		713		1,555		1,385		868		790		1,786		1,555

Note 10. Dividends Restrictions

Our U.S. insurance subsidiaries are subject to certain capital and dividend rules and regulations as prescribed by jurisdictions in which they are authorized to operate. Under the insurance laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Essent Guaranty and Essent PA may pay dividends during any 12-month period in an amount equal to the greater of (i) 10% of the preceding year-end statutory policyholders' surplus or (ii) the preceding year's statutory net income. The Pennsylvania statute also specifies that dividends and other distributions can be paid out of positive unassigned surplus without prior approval. At June 30, 2020, Essent Guaranty had unassigned surplus of approximately $298.5 million. Essent Guaranty did not pay dividends to Essent Group or any intermediate holding companies in the three and six months ended June 30, 2020 or 2019. As a result of PMIERs guidance issued by the GSEs, effective June 30, 2020 through March 31, 2021, Essent Guaranty is required to obtain GSE written approval before paying a dividend. Essent PA had unassigned surplus of approximately $14.4 million as of June 30, 2020. Essent PA did not pay a dividend in the three and six months ended June 30, 2020 or 2019.

Essent Re is subject to certain dividend restrictions as prescribed by the Bermuda Monetary Authority and under certain agreements with counterparties. In connection with the quota share reinsurance agreement with Essent Guaranty, Essent Re has agreed to maintain a minimum total equity of $100 million. As of June 30, 2020, Essent Re had total equity of $1.0 billion.

At June 30, 2020, our insurance subsidiaries were in compliance with these rules, regulations and agreements.

Note 11. Income Taxes

As of June 30, 2020, the statutory income tax rates of the countries where the Company does business are 21% in the United States and 0.0% in Bermuda. The statutory income tax rate of each country is applied against the taxable income from each country to calculate the income tax expense. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2020, our provision for income taxes was not based on an estimated annual effective rate due to uncertainty regarding the potential impacts of COVID-19 on our results of operations. Due to that uncertainty, we were unable to make a reliable estimate of pretax income and the annual effective tax rate for the full year 2020. Accordingly, the provision for income taxes for the three and six months ended June 30, 2020 was based on the actual effective tax rate for the year to date period.

Income tax expense consists of the following components:



	Three Months Ended June 30,					Six Months Ended June 30,
(In thousands)	2020			2019		2020		2019
Current	$	7,969		$	12,801	$	18,097	$	19,354
Deferred	(4,534		)	13,527		12,513		28,973
Total income tax expense	$	3,435		$	26,328	$	30,610	$	48,327

Table of Contents

Essent Group Ltd. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Income tax expense is different from that which would be obtained by applying the applicable statutory income tax rates to income before taxes by jurisdiction (i.e. U.S. 21%; Bermuda 0.0%). The reconciliation of the difference between income tax expense and the expected tax provision at the weighted average tax rate was as follows:



	Three Months Ended June 30,
	2020					2019
($ in thousands)	$			% of pretax income		$			% of pretax income
Tax provision at weighted average statutory rates	$	2,750		14.6	%	$	25,795		15.9	%
Non-deductible expenses	707			3.8		439			0.3
Tax exempt interest, net of proration	(358		)	(1.9	)	(418		)	(0.3	)
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation	21			0.1		(22		)	0.0
Other	315			1.7		534			0.3
Total income tax expense	$	3,435		18.3	%	$	26,328		16.2	%

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2020					2019
($ in thousands)	$			% of pretax income		$			% of pretax income
Tax provision at weighted average statutory rates	$	30,126		15.4	%	$	49,733		15.9	%
Non-deductible expenses	1,421			0.7		763			0.3
Tax exempt interest, net of proration	(700		)	(0.4	)	(861		)	(0.3	)
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation	(599		)	(0.3	)	(1,978		)	(0.6	)
Other	362			0.3		670			0.2
Total income tax expense	$	30,610		15.7	%	$	48,327		15.5	%

We provide deferred taxes to reflect the estimated future tax effects of the differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities using currently enacted tax laws. The net deferred tax liability was comprised of the following:



	June 30,			December 31,
(In thousands)	2020			2019
Deferred tax assets	$	28,124		$	29,392
Deferred tax liabilities	(300,870		)	(279,012		)
Net deferred tax liability	$	(272,746	)	$	(249,620	)

Table of Contents

Essent Group Ltd. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

The components of the net deferred tax liability were as follows:



	June 30,			December 31,
(In thousands)	2020			2019
Contingency reserves	$	(273,077	)	$	(261,855	)
Unrealized (gain) loss on investments	(23,828		)	(13,214		)
Unearned premium reserve	15,233			16,641
Accrued expenses	4,279			3,391
Deferred policy acquisition costs	(3,330		)	(3,298		)
Unearned ceding commissions	3,021			3,227
Loss reserves	1,493			416
Start-up expenditures, net	1,274			1,410
Fixed assets	1,260			1,502
Nonvested shares	830			2,426
Change in fair market value of derivatives	726			370
Investments in limited partnerships	(400		)	(400		)
Prepaid expenses	(131		)	(132		)
Loss reserves - TCJA transition adjustment	(104		)	(113		)
Organizational expenditures	8			9
Net deferred tax liability	$	(272,746	)	$	(249,620	)

As a mortgage guaranty insurer, we are eligible for a tax deduction, subject to certain limitations, under Section 832(e) of the IRC for amounts required by state law or regulation to be set aside in statutory contingency reserves. The deduction is allowed only to the extent that we purchase non-interest-bearing United States Mortgage Guaranty Tax and Loss Bonds ("T&L Bonds") issued by the Treasury Department in an amount equal to the tax benefit derived from deducting any portion of our statutory contingency reserves. During the six months ended June 30, 2020, we had purchases of T&L Bonds in the amount of $17.3 million and for the year ended December 31, 2019, we had net purchases of T&L Bonds in the amount of $59.5 million. As of June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, we held $279.1 million and $261.9 million of T&L Bonds, respectively.

In evaluating our ability to realize the benefit of our deferred tax assets, we consider the relevant impact of all available positive and negative evidence including our past operating results and our forecasts of future taxable income. At June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, after weighing all the evidence, management concluded that it was more likely than not that our deferred tax assets would be realized.

Note 912. Earnings per Share (EPS)

The following table reconciles the net income and the weighted average common shares outstanding used in the computations of basic and diluted earnings per common share:


	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,				Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
(In thousands, except per share amounts)	2019		2018		2019		2018		2020		2019		2020		2019
Net income	$	136,405	$	111,755	$	264,125	$	222,824	$	15,380	$	136,405	$	164,903	$	264,125
Less: dividends declared	—		—		—		—
Net income available to common shareholders	$	136,405	$	111,755	$	264,125	$	222,824

Basic weighted average shares outstanding									102,500		97,798		100,224		97,697
Dilutive effect of nonvested shares									105		372		242		440
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding									102,605		98,170		100,466		98,137

Basic earnings per share	$	1.39	$	1.15	$	2.70	$	2.29	$	0.15	$	1.39	$	1.65	$	2.70
Diluted earnings per share	$	1.39	$	1.14	$	2.69	$	2.28	$	0.15	$	1.39	$	1.64	$	2.69
Basic weighted average shares outstanding	97,798		97,426		97,697		97,362
Dilutive effect of nonvested shares	372		440		440		546
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding	98,170		97,866		98,137		97,908

Table of Contents

Essent Group Ltd. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

There were ~~17,018~~578,659 and ~~318,556~~17,018 antidilutive shares for the three months ended June 30, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018,~~2019, respectively, and ~~79,483~~465,945 and ~~242,860~~79,483 antidilutive shares for the six months ended June 30, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018,~~2019, respectively.

The nonvested performance-based share awards are considered contingently issuable for purposes of the EPS calculation. Based on the compounded annual book value per share growth as of June 30, ~~2019 and 2018, 100%~~2020, the following percentages of the ~~dilutive~~ performance-based share awards would be issuable under the terms of the arrangements ~~at each date~~ if June 30, 2020 was the end of the contingency period:



2018 Performance-Based Grants	100	%
2019 Performance-Based Grants	100	%
2020 Performance-Based Grants	—	%

Based on the compounded annual book value per share growth as of June 30, 2019, 100% of all performance-based share awards would have been issuable under the terms of the arrangements if June 30, 2019 was the end of the contingency period.

1721

Table of Contents

Essent Group Ltd. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Note ~~10.~~13. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

The following table presents the rollforward of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) for the three and six months ended June 30, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018:~~2019:


	Three Months Ended June 30,																		Three Months Ended June 30,
	2019									2018									2020									2019
(In thousands)	Before Tax			Tax Effect			Net of Tax			Before Tax			Tax Effect			Net of Tax			Before Tax			Tax Effect			Net of Tax			Before Tax			Tax Effect			Net of Tax
Balance at beginning of period	$	13,041		$	(3,668	)	$	9,373		$	(35,792	)	$	3,790		$	(32,002	)	$	52,348		$	(6,235	)	$	46,113		$	13,041		$	(3,668	)	$	9,373
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Unrealized holding gains (losses) on investments:
Unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during the period	43,664			(7,211		)	36,453			(8,225		)	1,325			(6,900		)
Less: Reclassification adjustment for gains included in net income (1)	(583		)	117			(466		)	(439		)	93			(346		)
Net unrealized gains (losses) on investments	43,081			(7,094		)	35,987			(8,664		)	1,418			(7,246		)
Other comprehensive income (loss)	43,081			(7,094		)	35,987			(8,664		)	1,418			(7,246		)
Unrealized holding gains arising during the period																			90,608			(17,344		)	73,264			43,664			(7,211		)	36,453
Less: Reclassification adjustment for losses (gains) included in net income (1)																			1,269			(248		)	1,021			(583		)	117			(466		)
Net unrealized gains on investments																			91,877			(17,592		)	74,285			43,081			(7,094		)	35,987
Other comprehensive income																			91,877			(17,592		)	74,285			43,081			(7,094		)	35,987
Balance at end of period	$	56,122		$	(10,762	)	$	45,360		$	(44,456	)	$	5,208		$	(39,248	)	$	144,225		$	(23,827	)	$	120,398		$	56,122		$	(10,762	)	$	45,360

	Six Months Ended June 30,																		Six Months Ended June 30,
	2019									2018									2020									2019
(In thousands)	Before Tax			Tax Effect			Net of Tax			Before Tax			Tax Effect			Net of Tax			Before Tax			Tax Effect			Net of Tax			Before Tax			Tax Effect			Net of Tax
Balance at beginning of year	$	(33,276	)	$	4,283		$	(28,993	)	$	(1,849	)	$	(1,403	)	$	(3,252	)	$	69,401		$	(13,214	)	$	56,187		$	(33,276	)	$	4,283		$	(28,993	)
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Unrealized holding gains (losses) on investments:
Unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during the period	90,641			(15,282		)	75,359			(41,971		)	6,445			(35,526		)
Unrealized holding gains arising during the period																			76,690			(10,941		)	65,749			90,641			(15,282		)	75,359
Less: Reclassification adjustment for gains included in net income (1)	(1,243		)	237			(1,006		)	(636		)	166			(470		)	(1,866		)	328			(1,538		)	(1,243		)	237			(1,006		)
Net unrealized gains (losses) on investments	89,398			(15,045		)	74,353			(42,607		)	6,611			(35,996		)
Other comprehensive income (loss)	89,398			(15,045		)	74,353			(42,607		)	6,611			(35,996		)
Net unrealized gains on investments																			74,824			(10,613		)	64,211			89,398			(15,045		)	74,353
Other comprehensive income																			74,824			(10,613		)	64,211			89,398			(15,045		)	74,353
Balance at end of period	$	56,122		$	(10,762	)	$	45,360		$	(44,456	)	$	5,208		$	(39,248	)	$	144,225		$	(23,827	)	$	120,398		$	56,122		$	(10,762	)	$	45,360


(1)	Included in net realized investment gains (losses) on our condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive income.

Note 1114. Fair Value of Financial Instruments

We carry certain of our financial instruments at fair value. We define fair value as the current amount that would be exchanged to sell an asset or transfer a liability, other than in a forced liquidation.

Fair Value Hierarchy

ASC No. 820 specifies a hierarchy of valuation techniques based on whether the inputs to those valuation techniques are observable or unobservable. Observable inputs reflect market data obtained from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect our market assumptions. The level within the fair value hierarchy to measure the financial instrument shall be determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are as follows:

Level 1 — Quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets accessible at the measurement date.

1822

Table of Contents

Essent Group Ltd. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Level 2 — Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and valuations in which all significant inputs are observable in active markets. Inputs are observable for substantially the full term of the financial instrument.

Level 3 — Valuations derived from one or more significant inputs that are unobservable.

Determination of Fair Value

When available, we generally use quoted market prices to determine fair value and classify the financial instrument in Level 1. In cases where quoted market prices for similar financial instruments are available, we utilize these inputs for valuation techniques and classify the financial instrument in Level 2. In cases where quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on estimates using discounted cash flows, present value or other valuation techniques. Those techniques are significantly affected by the assumptions used, including the discount rates and estimates of future cash flows and we classify the financial instrument in Level 3. Accordingly, the fair value estimates may not be realized in an immediate settlement of the instrument.

We used the following methods and assumptions in estimating fair values of financial instruments:

Investments available for sale — Investments available for sale are valued using quoted market prices in active markets, when available, and those investments are classified as Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. Level 1 investments available for sale include investments such as U.S. Treasury securities and money market funds. Investments available for sale are classified as Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy if quoted market prices are not available and fair values are estimated using quoted prices of similar securities or recently executed transactions for the securities. U.S. agency securities, U.S. agency mortgage-backed securities, municipal debt securities, non-U.S. government securities, corporate debt securities, residential and commercial mortgage securities and asset-backed securities are classified as Level 2 investments.

We use independent pricing sources to determine the fair value of securities available for sale in Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. We use one primary pricing service to provide individual security pricing based on observable market data and receive one quote per security. To ensure securities are appropriately classified in the fair value hierarchy, we review the pricing techniques and methodologies of the independent pricing service and believe that their policies adequately consider market activity, either based on specific transactions for the issue valued or based on modeling of securities with similar credit quality, duration, yield and structure that were recently traded. U.S. agency securities, U.S. agency mortgage-backed securities, municipal debt securities, non-U.S. government securities and corporate debt securities are valued by our primary vendor using recently executed transactions and proprietary models based on observable inputs, such as interest rate spreads, yield curves and credit risk. Residential and commercial mortgage securities and asset-backed securities are valued by our primary vendor using proprietary models based on observable inputs, such as interest rate spreads, prepayment speeds and credit risk. As part of our evaluation of investment prices provided by our primary pricing service, we obtained and reviewed their pricing methodologies which include a description of how each security type is evaluated and priced. We review the reasonableness of prices received from our primary pricing service by comparison to prices obtained from additional pricing sources. We have not made any adjustments to the prices obtained from our primary pricing service.

1923

Table of Contents

Essent Group Ltd. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value

All assets measured at fair value are categorized in the table below based upon the lowest level of significant input to the valuations. All fair value measurements at the reporting date were on a recurring basis.


June 30, 2019 (In thousands)	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Instruments (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Total
June 30, 2020 (In thousands)									Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Instruments (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Total
Recurring fair value measurements
Financial Assets:
U.S. Treasury securities	$	305,152	$	—	$	—	$	305,152	$	259,259	$	—	$	—	$	259,259
U.S. agency securities	—		33,473		—		33,473		—		14,682		—		14,682
U.S. agency mortgage-backed securities	—		724,382		—		724,382		—		830,124		—		830,124
Municipal debt securities	—		402,715		—		402,715		—		465,063		—		465,063
Non-U.S. government securities	—		47,670		—		47,670		—		54,637		—		54,637
Corporate debt securities	—		774,506		—		774,506		—		912,137		—		912,137
Residential and commercial mortgage securities	—		250,793		—		250,793		—		312,511		—		312,511
Asset-backed securities	—		352,053		—		352,053		—		385,486		—		385,486
Money market funds	209,470		—		—		209,470		1,118,204		—		—		1,118,204
Total assets at fair value (1)	$	514,622	$	2,585,592	$	—	$	3,100,214	$	1,377,463	$	2,974,640	$	—	$	4,352,103


(1)	Does not include the fair value of embedded derivatives, which we have accounted for separately as freestanding derivatives and included in other assets or other accrued liabilities in our condensed consolidated balance sheet. See Note 4 for more information.


December 31, 2018 (In thousands)	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Instruments (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Total
December 31, 2019 (In thousands)									Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Instruments (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Total
Recurring fair value measurements
Financial Assets:
U.S. Treasury securities	$	289,892	$	—	$	—	$	289,892	$	242,206	$	—	$	—	$	242,206
U.S. agency securities	—		32,997		—		32,997		—		33,605		—		33,605
U.S. agency mortgage-backed securities	—		637,178		—		637,178		—		848,334		—		848,334
Municipal debt securities	—		483,879		—		483,879		—		361,638		—		361,638
Non-U.S. government securities	—		45,001		—		45,001		—		54,995		—		54,995
Corporate debt securities	—		725,201		—		725,201		—		880,301		—		880,301
Residential and commercial mortgage securities	—		121,838		—		121,838		—		288,281		—		288,281
Asset-backed securities	—		284,997		—		284,997		—		326,025		—		326,025
Money market funds	139,083		—		—		139,083		315,362		—		—		315,362
Total assets at fair value(1)	$	428,975	$	2,331,091	$	—	$	2,760,066	$	557,568	$	2,793,179	$	—	$	3,350,747


(1)	Does not include the fair value of embedded derivatives, which we have accounted for separately as freestanding derivatives and included in other assets or other accrued liabilities in our condensed consolidated balance sheet. See Note 4 for more information.

2024

Table of Contents

Essent Group Ltd. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Note 1215. Statutory Accounting

Our U.S. insurance subsidiaries prepare statutory-basis financial statements in accordance with the accounting practices prescribed or permitted by their respective state’s department of insurance, which is a comprehensive basis of accounting other than GAAP. We did not use any prescribed or permitted statutory accounting practices (individually or in the aggregate) that resulted in reported statutory surplus or capital that was significantly different from the statutory surplus or capital that would have been reported had National Association of Insurance Commissioners’ statutory accounting practices been followed. The following table presents Essent Guaranty’s and Essent PA’s statutory net income, statutory surplus and contingency reserve liability as of and for the six months ended June 30:


(In thousands)	2019		2018		2020		2019
Essent Guaranty
Statutory net income	$	208,268	$	182,784	$	120,883	$	208,268
Statutory surplus	940,290		798,183		1,003,812		940,290
Contingency reserve liability	1,049,236		792,447		1,345,263		1,049,236

Essent PA
Statutory net income	$	4,216	$	4,861	$	2,258	$	4,216
Statutory surplus	51,151		47,495		53,432		51,151
Contingency reserve liability	50,915		45,985		54,685		50,915

Net income determined in accordance with statutory accounting practices differs from GAAP. In ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018,~~2019, the more significant differences between net income determined under statutory accounting practices and GAAP for Essent Guaranty and Essent PA relate to policy acquisition costs and income taxes. Under statutory accounting practices, policy acquisition costs are expensed as incurred while such costs are capitalized and amortized to expense over the life of the policy under GAAP. We are eligible for a tax deduction, subject to certain limitations for amounts required by state law or regulation to be set aside in statutory contingency reserves when we purchase non-interest-bearing United States Mortgage Guaranty Tax and Loss Bonds (“T&L Bonds”) issued by the Treasury Department. Under statutory accounting practices, this deduction reduces the tax provision recorded by Essent Guaranty and Essent PA and, as a result, increases statutory net income and surplus as compared to net income and equity determined in accordance with GAAP.

At June 30, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018,~~2019, the statutory capital of our U.S. insurance subsidiaries, which is defined as the total of statutory surplus and contingency reserves, was in excess of the statutory capital necessary to satisfy their regulatory requirements.

Effective December 31, 2015, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, at the direction of the Federal Housing Finance Agency, implemented new coordinated Private Mortgage Insurer Eligibility Requirements, which we refer to as the "PMIERs." The PMIERs represent the standards by which private mortgage insurers are eligible to provide mortgage insurance on loans owned or guaranteed by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. The PMIERs include financial strength requirements incorporating a risk-based framework that require approved insurers to have a sufficient level of liquid assets from which to pay claims. The PMIERs also include enhanced operational performance expectations and define remedial actions that apply should an approved insurer fail to comply with these requirements. In 2018, the GSEs released revised PMIERs framework ("PMIERs 2.0") which became effective on March 31, 2019. As of June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, Essent Guaranty, our GSE-approved mortgage insurance company, was in compliance with PMIERs 2.0.

Statement of Statutory Accounting Principles No. 58, Mortgage Guaranty Insurance, requires mortgage insurers to establish a special contingency reserve for statutory accounting purposes included in total liabilities equal to 50% of earned premium for that year. During the six months ended June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, Essent Guaranty increased its contingency reserve by ~~$132.7~~$148.0 million and Essent PA increased its contingency reserve by ~~$2.4~~$1.7 million. This reserve is required to be maintained for a period of 120 months to protect against the effects of adverse economic cycles. After 120 months, the reserve is released to unassigned funds. In the event an insurer’s loss ratio in any calendar year exceeds 35%, however, the insurer may, after regulatory approval, release from its contingency reserves an amount equal to the excess portion of such losses. Essent Guaranty and Essent PA did not release any amounts from their contingency reserves in the six months ended June 30, ~~2019~~2020 or ~~2018.~~2019.

2125

Table of Contents

Essent Group Ltd. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Under The Insurance Act 1978, as amended, and related regulations of Bermuda (the "Insurance Act"), Essent Re is required to annually prepare statutory financial statements and a statutory financial return in accordance with the financial reporting provisions of the Insurance Act, which is a basis other than GAAP. The Insurance Act also requires that Essent Re maintain minimum share capital of $1 million and must ensure that the value of its general business assets exceeds the amount of its general business liabilities by an amount greater than the prescribed minimum solvency margins and enhanced capital requirement pertaining to its general business. At December 31, ~~2018,~~2019, all such requirements were met.

Essent Re's statutory capital and surplus was ~~$899.0 million~~$1.0 billion as of June 30, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~$798.5~~$939.2 million as of December 31, ~~2018.~~2019. Essent Re's statutory net income was ~~$82.7~~$59.0 million and ~~$65.0~~$82.7 million for the six months ended June 30, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018,~~2019, respectively. Statutory capital and surplus as of June 30, ~~2019~~2020 and December 31, ~~2018~~2019 and statutory net income in the six months ended June 30, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018~~2019 determined in accordance with statutory accounting practices were not significantly different than the amounts determined under GAAP.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion should be read together with the “Selected Financial Data” and our audited consolidated financial statements and related notes included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K as of and for the year ended December 31, ~~2018~~2019 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and referred to herein as the “Annual Report,” and our condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes as of and for the three and six months ended June 30, ~~2019~~2020 included in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, which we refer to as the “Quarterly Report.” In addition to historical information, this discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions that could cause actual results to differ materially from management’s expectations. Factors that could cause such differences are discussed in the sections entitled “Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” in this Quarterly Report and Part I, Item 1A “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report. We are not undertaking any obligation to update any forward-looking statements or other statements we may make in the following discussion or elsewhere in this document even though these statements may be affected by events or circumstances occurring after the forward-looking statements or other statements were made.

Overview

We are an established and growing private mortgage insurance company. Essent Guaranty, Inc., our wholly-owned insurance subsidiary which we refer to as "Essent Guaranty," is licensed to write coverage in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. The financial strength ratings of Essent Guaranty ~~is rated Baa1~~are A3 with a stable outlook by Moody’s ~~Investor Services~~Investors Service (“Moody's”), BBB+ with a ~~stable~~negative outlook by S&P Global Ratings (“S&P”) and A (Excellent) with a stable outlook by A.M. Best. Essent Guaranty's financial strength rating was reaffirmed by A.M. Best on June 4, 2020 and by Moody's on July 21, 2020.

Our holding company is domiciled in Bermuda and our U.S. insurance business is headquartered in Radnor, Pennsylvania. We operate additional underwriting and service centers in Winston-Salem, North Carolina and Irvine, California. We have a highly experienced, talented team with ~~383~~389 employees as of June 30, ~~2019.~~2020. We generated new insurance written, or NIW, of approximately $28.2 billion and $41.7 billion for the three and six months ended June 30, 2020, respectively, compared to approximately $18.0 billion and $29.0 billion for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019, ~~respectively, compared to approximately $12.9 billion and $22.2 billion for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018,~~ respectively. As of June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, we had approximately ~~$153.3~~$174.6 billion of insurance in force.

We also offer mortgage-related insurance and reinsurance through our wholly-owned Bermuda-based subsidiary, Essent Reinsurance Ltd., which we refer to as "Essent Re." As of June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, Essent Re provided insurance or reinsurance relating to GSE risk share and other reinsurance transactions covering approximately ~~$802.5 million~~$1.0 billion of risk. Essent Re also reinsures 25% of Essent Guaranty’s NIW under a quota share reinsurance agreement. The insurer financial strength rating of Essent Re is BBB+ with a ~~stable~~negative outlook by S&P and A (Excellent) with a stable outlook by A.M. Best. On June 4, 2020 A.M. Best reaffirmed its rating of Essent Re.

COVID-19

The novel coronavirus disease 2019 ("COVID-19") was first identified in December 2019 in Wuhan China. On March 11, 2020 the outbreak had spread to be declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization (“WHO”). Within a week of the WHO's declaration, most major economies had announced significant and increasing restrictions on the movement and interaction of people. By the end of March 2020, it was estimated that a quarter of the world’s population was under some form of lockdown or stay-at-home order. Most state governments in the United States implemented some form of travel and/or business restrictions to slow the spread of COVID-19. Business restrictions, stay-at-home orders and travel restrictions have resulted in a significant increase in unemployment in the United States, which has increased the number of delinquencies and has the potential to increase claim frequencies on the mortgages we insure.

In response to the impact of COVID-19, the federal government has implemented unprecedented measures to assist borrowers in avoiding foreclosures and allow families to remain in their homes. Most notably, under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act ("CARES Act"), consumers with federally backed mortgages were granted two financial protections: (1) a temporary moratorium on foreclosures, and (2) mortgage forbearance, either in the form of a lower monthly payment or temporarily suspending payments. Under the new law, borrowers have the right to request forbearance for up to 360 days due to hardship caused by COVID-19. We believe that these measures will likely increase the overall duration of the default resolution process and reduce the number of defaults that result in claims compared to our historical default-to-claim experience. However, the increase in the default resolution process may result in increases in claim severities for loans that proceed to claim.

Over 95% of loans insured by Essent are federally backed by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac. As a mortgage loan in forbearance is considered delinquent, we will provide loss reserves as loans in forbearance are reported to us as delinquent once the borrower has missed two consecutive payments. However, we believe providing borrowers time to recover from the adverse financial impact of the COVID-19 event may allow some families to be able to remain in their homes and avoid foreclosure. For borrowers that have the ability to begin to pay their mortgage at the end of the forbearance period, we expect that mortgage servicers will work with them to modify their loans at which time the mortgage will be removed from delinquency status.

Essent has had a Pandemic Plan in place as part of its comprehensive Business Continuity Program for a number of years and invoked the Pandemic Plan in light of the COVID-19 event. Our workforce has been working in "full remote" mode since March 16, 2020. Through the use of technology, our national and regional account managers and customer service team have been in contact with our policyholders and their servicers, and we have made several COVID-19-related announcements which have been posted on our mortgage insurance website.

As of March 31, 2020, COVID-19 had not had a significant impact on our financial position or results of operations. During the three months ended June 30, 2020, the number and percentage of mortgage loans we insure that were reported to have missed at least two consecutive payments of principal and interest had increased as a result of COVID-19, which has resulted in an increase in our provision for losses in the three and six months ended June 30, 2020. The impact on our reserves in future periods will be dependent upon the amount of delinquent notices received from loan servicers and our expectations for the amount of ultimate losses on these delinquencies. As noted in “— Liquidity and Capital Resources,” Essent had substantial liquidity and had Available Assets in excess of Minimum Required Assets under PMIERs 2.0 as of June 30, 2020. In order to maintain continuous MI coverage, mortgage servicers are required to advance MI premiums to us even if borrowers are in a forbearance plan. Future increases in defaults may result in an increase in our provisions for loss and loss adjustment expenses compared to prior periods, reduced profit commission under our quota share reinsurance agreement with a panel of third-party reinsurers ("the QSR Agreement") and an increase in our Minimum Required Assets.

Legislative and Regulatory Developments

Our results are significantly impacted by, and our future success may be affected by, legislative and regulatory developments affecting the housing finance industry. See Part I, Item 1 “Business—Regulation” and Part II, Item 7 “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Legislative and Regulatory Developments” in our Annual Report for a discussion of the laws and regulations to which we are subject as well as legislative and regulatory developments affecting the housing finance industry.

Effective December 31, 2015, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, at the direction of the Federal Housing Finance Agency ("FHFA"), implemented new coordinated Private Mortgage Insurer Eligibility Requirements, which we refer to as the "PMIERs." The PMIERs represent the standards by which private mortgage insurers are eligible to provide mortgage insurance on loans owned or guaranteed by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. The PMIERs include financial strength requirements incorporating a risk-based framework that require approved insurers to have a sufficient level of liquid assets from which to pay claims. The PMIERs also include enhanced operational performance expectations and define remedial actions that apply should an approved insurer fail to comply with these requirements. In 2018, the GSEs released revised PMIERs framework ("PMIERs 2.0") which became effective on March 31, 2019. As of June 30, 2019, Essent Guaranty, our GSE-approved mortgage insurance company, was in compliance with PMIERs 2.0. See additional discussion in “— Liquidity and Capital Resources —Private Mortgage Insurer Eligibility Requirements.”

The U.S. Internal Revenue Service and Department of the Treasury issued proposed regulations on July 10, 2019 relating to the tax treatment of passive foreign investment companies ("PFICs"). The proposed regulations provide guidance on various PFIC rules, including changes resulting from the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. ~~As these regulations have only been recently issued, management~~The Company is ~~currently in the process of~~ evaluating the potential impact of these proposed regulations to its shareholders and business operations.

Factors Affecting Our Results of Operations

Net Premiums Written and Earned

Premiums associated with our U.S. mortgage insurance business are based on insurance in force ("IIF") during all or a portion of a period. A change in the average IIF during a period causes premiums to increase or decrease as compared to prior periods. Average net premium rates in effect during a given period will also cause premiums to differ when compared to earlier periods. IIF at the end of a reporting period is a function of the IIF at the beginning of such reporting period plus NIW less policy cancellations (including claims paid) during the period. As a result, premiums are generally influenced by:

NIW, which is the aggregate principal amount of the new mortgages that are insured during a period. Many factors affect NIW, including, among others, the volume of low down payment home mortgage originations, the competition to provide credit enhancement on those mortgages, the number of customers who have approved us to provide mortgage insurance and changes in our NIW from certain customers;

Cancellations of our insurance policies, which are impacted by payments on mortgages, home price appreciation, or refinancings, which in turn are affected by mortgage interest rates. Cancellations are also impacted by the levels of claim payments and rescissions;

Premium rates, which represent the amount of the premium due as a percentage of IIF. Premium rates are based on the risk characteristics of the loans insured, the percentage of coverage on the loans, competition from other mortgage insurers and general industry conditions; and


•	Premiums ceded or assumed under reinsurance arrangements. See Note 4 to our condensed consolidated financial statements.

Premiums are paid either on a monthly installment basis (“monthly premiums”), in a single payment at origination (“single premiums”), or in some cases as an annual premium. For monthly premiums, we receive a monthly premium payment which is recorded as net premiums earned in the month the coverage is provided. Monthly premium payments are based on the original mortgage amount rather than the amortized loan balance. Net premiums written may be in excess of net premiums earned due to single premium policies. For single premiums, we receive a single premium payment at origination, which is recorded as “unearned premium” and earned over the estimated life of the policy, which ranges from 36 to 156 months depending on the term of the underlying mortgage and loan-to-value ratio at date of origination. If single premium policies are cancelled due to repayment of the underlying loan and the premium is non-refundable, the remaining unearned premium balance is immediately recognized as earned premium revenue. Substantially all of our single premium policies in force as of June 30, ~~2019~~2020 were non-refundable. Premiums collected on annual policies are recognized as net premiums earned on a straight-line basis over the year of coverage. For the six months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, monthly ~~and single~~ premium policies comprised ~~88.2%~~90% and ~~11.8%~~88% of our NIW, respectively.

Premiums associated with our GSE and other risk share transactions are based on the level of risk in force and premium rates on the transactions.

Persistency and Business Mix

The percentage of IIF that remains on our books after any 12-month period is defined as our persistency rate. Because our insurance premiums are earned over the life of a policy, higher persistency rates can have a significant impact on our profitability. The persistency rate on our portfolio was ~~84.8%~~67.9% at June 30, ~~2019.~~2020. Generally, higher prepayment speeds lead to lower persistency.

Prepayment speeds and the relative mix of business between single premium policies and monthly premium policies also impact our profitability. Our premium rates include certain assumptions regarding repayment or prepayment speeds of the mortgages. Because premiums are paid at origination on single premium policies, assuming all other factors remain constant, if loans are prepaid earlier than expected, our profitability on these loans is likely to increase and, if loans are repaid slower than expected, our profitability on these loans is likely to decrease. By contrast, if monthly premium loans are repaid earlier than anticipated, our premium earned with respect to those loans and therefore our profitability declines. Currently, the expected return on single premium policies is less than the expected return on monthly policies.

Net Investment Income

Our investment portfolio was predominantly comprised of investment-grade fixed income securities and money market funds as of June 30, ~~2019.~~2020. The principal factors that influence investment income are the size of the investment portfolio and the yield on individual securities. As measured by amortized cost (which excludes changes in fair market value, such as from changes in interest rates), the size of our investment portfolio is mainly a function of increases in capital and cash generated from or used in operations which is impacted by net premiums received, investment earnings, net claim payments and expenses. Realized gains and losses are a function of the difference between the amount received on the sale of a security and the security’s amortized cost, as well as any ~~“other-than-temporary”~~provision for credit losses or impairments recognized in earnings. The amount received on the sale of fixed income securities is affected by the coupon rate of the security compared to the yield of comparable securities at the time of sale.

Other Income

Other income includes revenues associated with contract underwriting services and underwriting consulting services to third-party reinsurers. The level of contract underwriting revenue is dependent upon the number of customers who have engaged us for this service and the number of loans underwritten for these customers. Revenue from underwriting consulting services to third-party reinsurers is dependent upon the number of customers who have engaged us for this service and the level of premiums associated with the transactions underwritten for these customers.

In connection with the acquisition of our mortgage insurance platform, we entered into a services agreement with Triad Guaranty Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Triad Guaranty Insurance Corporation, which we refer to collectively as “Triad,” to provide certain information technology maintenance and development and customer support-related services. In return for these services, we receive a fee which is recorded in other income. ~~This~~Prior to December 1, 2019, this fee iswas adjusted monthly based on the number of Triad’s mortgage insurance policies in force and, accordingly, ~~will decrease~~decreased over time as Triad’s existing policies ~~are~~were cancelled. Effective December 1, 2019, the services agreement was amended providing for a flat monthly fee through November 30, 2021. The services agreement ~~was automatically extended until November 30, 2019.~~provides for two subsequent one-year renewals at Triad's option.

As more fully described in Note 4 to our condensed consolidated financial statements, the ~~premium~~premiums ceded under certain reinsurance contracts with unaffiliated third parties ~~varies~~vary based on changes in market interest rates. Under GAAP, these contracts contain embedded derivatives that are accounted for separately as freestanding derivatives. The change in the fair value of the embedded derivatives is reported in earnings and included in other income.

Provision for Losses and Loss Adjustment Expenses

The provision for losses and loss adjustment expenses reflects the current expense that is recorded within a particular period to reflect actual and estimated loss payments that we believe will ultimately be made as a result of insured loans that are in default.

Losses incurred are generally affected by:

the overall state of the economy, which broadly affects the likelihood that borrowers may default on their loans and have the ability to cure such defaults;

changes in housing values, which affect our ability to mitigate our losses through the sale of properties with loans in default as well as borrower willingness to continue to make mortgage payments when the value of the home is below or perceived to be below the mortgage balance;

the product mix of IIF, with loans having higher risk characteristics generally resulting in higher defaults and claims;

the size of loans insured, with higher average loan amounts tending to increase losses incurred;

the loan-to-value ratio, with higher average loan-to-value ratios tending to increase losses incurred;

the percentage of coverage on insured loans, with deeper average coverage tending to increase losses incurred;

credit quality of borrowers, including higher debt-to-income ratios and lower FICO scores, which tend to increase incurred losses;

the level and amount of reinsurance coverage maintained with third parties;

the rate at which we rescind policies. Because of tighter underwriting standards generally in the mortgage lending industry and terms set forth in our master policy, we expect that our level of rescission activity will be lower than rescission activity seen in the mortgage insurance industry for vintages originated prior to the financial crisis; and

the distribution of claims over the life of a book. As of June 30, ~~2019, 69%~~2020, 68% of our IIF relates to business written since January 1, ~~2017~~2018 and was less than three years old. As a result, based on historical industry performance, we expect the number of defaults and claims we experience, as well as our provision for losses and loss adjustment expenses ("LAE"), to increase as our portfolio seasons. See “— Mortgage Insurance Earnings and Cash Flow Cycle” below.

We establish loss reserves for delinquent loans when we are notified that a borrower has missed at least two consecutive monthly payments (“Case Reserves”), as well as estimated reserves for defaults that may have occurred but not yet been reported to us (“IBNR Reserves”). We also establish reserves for the associated loss adjustment expenses, ~~(“LAE”),~~ consisting of the estimated cost of the claims administration process, including legal and other fees. Using both internal and external information, we establish our reserves based on the likelihood that a default will reach claim status and estimated claim severity. See Part II, Item 7 “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Critical Accounting Policies” included in our Annual Report for further information.

We believe, based upon our experience and industry data, that claims incidence for mortgage insurance is generally highest in the third through sixth years after loan origination. As of June 30, ~~2019, 69%~~2020, 68% of our IIF relates to business written since January 1, ~~2017~~2018 and was less than three years old. Although the claims experience on new insurance written by us to date has been favorable, we expect incurred losses and claims to increase as a greater amount of this book of insurance reaches its anticipated period of highest claim frequency. The actual default rate and the average reserve per default that we experience as our portfolio matures is difficult to predict and is dependent on the specific characteristics of our current in-force book (including the credit score of the borrower, the loan-to-value ratio of the mortgage, geographic concentrations, etc.), as well as the profile of new business we write in the future. In addition, the default rate and the average reserve per default will be affected by future macroeconomic factors such as housing prices, interest rates and employment.

~~During~~Due to business restrictions, stay-at-home orders and travel restrictions implemented in March 2020 as a result of COVID-19, unemployment in the ~~third quarter of 2017, certain regions~~United States has increased significantly. As unemployment is one of the ~~U.S. experienced hurricanes which have impacted our~~most common reasons for borrowers to default on their mortgage, the increase in unemployment has increased the number of delinquencies on the mortgages we insure, and has the potential to increase claim frequencies on defaults. As of June 30, 2020, insured ~~portfolio’s performance. Loans~~loans in default ~~identified~~totaled 38,068 and included 34,352 defaults classified as ~~hurricane-related~~COVID-19 defaults ~~totaled 2,288~~compared to 5,841 total defaults and no COVID-19 defaults as of ~~December~~March 31, ~~2017. In~~2020. For borrowers that have the ~~year ended December 31, 2018, 2,150~~ability to begin to pay their mortgage at the end of the ~~2,288 defaults previously identified as hurricane-related cured.~~forbearance period, we expect that mortgage servicers will work with them to modify their loans at which time the mortgage will be removed from delinquency status. We believe that the forbearance process could have a favorable effect on the frequency of claims that we ultimately pay. Based on ~~our experience to date~~the forbearance programs in place and ~~prior industry experience,~~the credit characteristics of the COVID-19 defaulted loans, we expect the ultimate number of ~~hurricane-related~~COVID-19-related defaults that result in claims will be less than our historical default-to-claim experience. Accordingly, we applied a lower reserve rate to COVID-19 default notices received in the ~~default-to-claim experience~~three months ended June 30, 2020 than the rate used for defaults that had missed three payments or less as of ~~non-hurricane-related defaults. In addition, under~~June 30, 2019. It is reasonably possible that our master policy, our exposure may be limited on hurricane-related claims. For example, we are permitted to exclude a claim entirely where damage to the property underlying a mortgage was the proximate causeestimate of the ~~default~~losses for the COVID-19 defaults could change in the near term as a result of the continued impact of the pandemic on the economic environment, the results of existing and ~~adjust~~future governmental programs designed to assist individuals and businesses impacted by the virus and the performance of the COVID-19 defaults in the forbearance programs. As more fully described in Note 4 to our condensed consolidated financial statements, at June 30, 2020, we had approximately $1.6 billion of excess of loss reinsurance covering NIW from January 1, 2015 to August 31, 2019 and a ~~claim where~~quota share reinsurance transaction on a portion of our NIW effective September 1, 2019 and continuing through December 31, 2020. The impact on our reserves in future periods will be dependent upon the ~~property underlying a mortgage in default is subject to unrestored physical damage.~~amount of delinquent notices received from loan servicers, the performance of COVID-19 defaults and our expectations for the amount of ultimate losses on these delinquencies.

Third-Party Reinsurance

We use third-party reinsurance to provide protection against adverse loss experience and to expand our capital sources. When we enter into a reinsurance agreement, the reinsurer receives a premium and, in exchange, agrees to insure an agreed upon portion of incurred losses. These arrangements have the impact of reducing our earned premiums, but also reduce our risk in force ("RIF"), which provides capital relief, and may include capital relief under the PMIERs financial strength requirements. Our incurred losses are reduced by any incurred losses ceded in accordance with the reinsurance agreement. For additional information regarding reinsurance, see Note 4 to our condensed consolidated financial statements.

Other Underwriting and Operating Expenses

Our other underwriting and operating expenses include components that are substantially fixed, as well as expenses that generally increase or decrease in line with the level of NIW.

Our most significant expense is compensation and benefits for our employees, which represented 62% and 61% of other underwriting and operating expenses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2020, respectively, compared to 56% of other underwriting and operating expenses for each of the three and six months ended June 30, ~~2019, compared to 61% and 62% of other underwriting and operating expenses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively.~~2019. Compensation and benefits expense includes base and incentive cash compensation, stock compensation expense, benefits and payroll taxes.

Underwriting and other expenses include legal, consulting, other professional fees, premium taxes, travel, entertainment, marketing, licensing, supplies, hardware, software, rent, utilities, depreciation and amortization and other expenses. We anticipate that as we continue to add new customers and increase our IIF, our expenses will also continue to increase.

increase. In addition, as a result of the increase in our IIF, we expect that our net premiums earned will grow faster than our underwriting and other expenses resulting in a decline in our expense ratio for the full year 2019 as compared to 2018.

Interest Expense

Interest expense is incurred as a result of borrowings under our secured credit facility (the “Credit Facility”). Borrowings under the Credit Facility may be used for working capital and general corporate purposes, including, without limitation, capital contributions to Essent’s insurance and reinsurance subsidiaries. Borrowings accrue interest at a floating rate tied to a standard short-term borrowing index, selected at the Company’s option, plus an applicable margin.

Income Taxes

Income taxes are incurred based on the amount of earnings or losses generated in the jurisdictions in which we operate and the applicable tax rates and regulations in those jurisdictions. Our U.S. insurance subsidiaries are generally not subject to income taxes in the states in which we operate; however, our non-insurance subsidiaries are subject to state income taxes. In lieu of state income taxes, our insurance subsidiaries pay premium taxes that are recorded in other underwriting and operating expenses.

Essent Group Ltd. ("Essent Group") and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Essent Re, are domiciled in Bermuda, which does not have a corporate income tax. Essent Re reinsures 25% of Essent Guaranty's NIW under a quota share reinsurance agreement. Essent Re also provides insurance and reinsurance to Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae.

The amount of income tax expense or benefit recorded in future periods will be dependent on the jurisdictions in which we operate and the tax laws and regulations in effect.

Mortgage Insurance Earnings and Cash Flow Cycle

In general, the majority of any underwriting profit (premium revenue minus losses) that a book generates occurs in the early years of the book, with the largest portion of any underwriting profit realized in the first year. Subsequent years of a book generally result in modest underwriting profit or underwriting losses. This pattern generally occurs because relatively few of the claims that a book will ultimately experience typically occur in the first few years of the book, when premium revenue is highest, while subsequent years are affected by declining premium revenues, as the number of insured loans decreases (primarily due to loan prepayments), and by increasing losses.

Key Performance Indicators

Insurance In Force

As discussed above, premiums we collect and earn are generated based on our IIF, which is a function of our NIW and cancellations. The following table includes a summary of the change in our IIF for the three and six months ended June 30, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018~~2019 for our U.S. mortgage insurance portfolio. In addition, this table includes RIF at the end of each period.


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,						Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
(In thousands)	2019			2018			2019			2018			2020			2019			2020			2019
IIF, beginning of period	$	143,181,641		$	115,250,949		$	137,720,786		$	110,461,950		$	165,615,503		$	143,181,641		$	164,005,853		$	137,720,786
NIW - Flow	17,973,505			12,850,642			28,918,812			22,186,792			28,163,212			17,973,505			41,712,511			28,918,812
NIW - Bulk	29,524			—			84,526			—			—			29,524			151			84,526
Cancellations	(7,867,513		)	(5,600,345		)	(13,406,967		)	(10,147,496		)	(19,132,442		)	(7,867,513		)	(31,072,242		)	(13,406,967		)
IIF, end of period	$	153,317,157		$	122,501,246		$	153,317,157		$	122,501,246		$	174,646,273		$	153,317,157		$	174,646,273		$	153,317,157
Average IIF during the period	$	148,188,377		$	118,658,900		$	144,302,864		$	115,878,005		$	168,635,275		$	148,188,377		$	166,865,006		$	144,302,864
RIF, end of period	$	37,034,687		$	30,154,694		$	37,034,687		$	30,154,694		$	39,113,879		$	37,034,687		$	39,113,879		$	37,034,687

The following is a summary of our IIF at June 30, ~~2019~~2020 by vintage:


($ in thousands)	$		%		$		%
2019 (through June 30)	$	28,526,663	18.6	%
2020 (through June 30)					$	41,196,840	23.6	%
2019					51,138,928		29.3
2018	42,790,095		27.9		26,920,663		15.4
2017	34,821,992		22.7		23,247,877		13.3
2016	22,423,350		14.6		15,675,316		9.0
2015	11,777,504		7.7
2014 and prior	12,977,553		8.5
2015 and prior					16,466,649		9.4
	$	153,317,157	100.0	%	$	174,646,273	100.0	%

Average Net Premium Rate

Our average net premium rate is dependent on a number of factors, including: (1) the risk characteristics and average coverage on the mortgages we insure; (2) the mix of monthly premiums compared to single premiums in our portfolio; (3) cancellations of non-refundable single premiums during the period; (4) changes to our pricing for NIW; and (5) premiums ceded under third-party reinsurance agreements. For ~~the three and six months ended June 30, 2019, our average net premium rate was 0.49% and 0.48%, respectively, as compared to 0.51% for~~ each of the three and six months ended June 30, ~~2018.~~2020, our average net premium rate was 0.48%, as compared to 0.49% and 0.48% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019, respectively. In ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2019,~~2020, Essent Guaranty entered into third-party reinsurance ~~agreements, and in June 2018, we announced a reduction in pricing on our published rates effective for future NIW.~~agreements. We anticipate that the continued use of third-party reinsurance ~~and the announced pricing reductions on future NIW~~ will reduce our average net premium rate in future periods.

Persistency Rate

The measure for assessing the impact of policy cancellations on IIF is our persistency rate, defined as the percentage of IIF that remains on our books after any twelve-month period. See additional discussion regarding the impact of the persistency rate on our performance in “— Factors Affecting Our Results of Operations — Persistency and Business Mix.”

Risk-to-Capital

The risk-to-capital ratio has historically been used as a measure of capital adequacy in the U.S. mortgage insurance industry and is calculated as a ratio of net risk in force to statutory capital. Net risk in force represents total risk in force net of reinsurance ceded and net of exposures on policies for which loss reserves have been established. Statutory capital for our U.S. insurance companies is computed based on accounting practices prescribed or permitted by the Pennsylvania Insurance Department. See additional discussion in “— Liquidity and Capital Resources — Insurance Company Capital.”

As of June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, our combined net risk in force for our U.S. insurance companies was ~~$28.5~~$28.8 billion and our combined statutory capital was ~~$2.1~~$2.5 billion, resulting in a risk-to-capital ratio of ~~13.6~~11.7 to 1. The amount of capital required varies in each jurisdiction in which we operate; however, generally, the maximum permitted risk-to-capital ratio is 25.0 to 1. State insurance regulators are currently examining their respective capital rules to determine whether, in light of the financial crisis, changes are needed to more accurately assess mortgage insurers’ ability to withstand stressful economic conditions. As a result, the capital metrics under which they assess and measure capital adequacy may change in the future. Independent of the state regulator and GSE capital requirements, management continually assesses the risk of our insurance portfolio and current market and economic conditions to determine the appropriate levels of capital to support our business.

Results of Operations

The following table sets forth our results of operations for the periods indicated:


Summary of Operations	Three Months Ended June 30,					Six Months Ended June 30,					Three Months Ended June 30,					Six Months Ended June 30,
(In thousands)	2019		2018			2019		2018			2020			2019		2020		2019
Revenues:
Net premiums written	$	188,404	$	168,404		$	366,048	$	333,629		$	205,904		$	188,404	$	397,647	$	366,048
Decrease (increase) in unearned premiums	86		(11,446		)	233		(24,113		)
Decrease in unearned premiums											5,567			86		20,320		233
Net premiums earned	188,490		156,958			366,281		309,516			211,471			188,490		417,967		366,281
Net investment income	20,581		15,134			40,461		28,848			19,866			20,581		40,499		40,461
Realized investment gains, net	583		439			1,243		636
Realized investment gains (losses), net											(1,269		)	583		1,866		1,243
Other income	2,238		1,237			4,433		2,231			6,009			2,238		4,585		4,433
Total revenues	211,892		173,768			412,418		341,231			236,077			211,892		464,917		412,418

Losses and expenses:
Provision for losses and LAE	4,960		1,813			12,067		7,122			175,877			4,960		183,940		12,067
Other underwriting and operating expenses	41,520		36,428			82,550		74,552			38,819			41,520		80,766		82,550
Interest expense	2,679		2,618			5,349		5,068			2,566			2,679		4,698		5,349
Total losses and expenses	49,159		40,859			99,966		86,742			217,262			49,159		269,404		99,966
Income before income taxes	162,733		132,909			312,452		254,489			18,815			162,733		195,513		312,452
Income tax expense	26,328		21,154			48,327		31,665			3,435			26,328		30,610		48,327
Net income	$	136,405	$	111,755		$	264,125	$	222,824		$	15,380		$	136,405	$	164,903	$	264,125

Three and Six Months Ended June 30, ~~2019~~2020 Compared to the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, ~~2018~~2019

For the three months ended June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, we reported net income of ~~$136.4~~$15.4 million, compared to net income of ~~$111.8~~$136.4 million for the three months ended June 30, ~~2018.~~2019. For the six months ended June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, we reported net income of ~~$264.1~~$164.9 million, compared to net income of ~~$222.8~~$264.1 million for the six months ended June 30, ~~2018.~~2019. The ~~increases~~decreases in our operating results in ~~2019~~2020 over the same periods in ~~2018 were~~2019 was primarily due to ~~the increase in net premiums earned associated with the growth of our IIF and the increase in net investment income, partially offset by~~ increases in the provision for losses and LAE, partially offset by increases in net premiums earned and other income and decreases in other underwriting and operating expenses and income tax expense.

Net Premiums Written and Earned

Net premiums earned increased in the three months ended June 30, ~~2019~~2020 by ~~20%~~12%, compared to the three months ended June 30, ~~2018~~2019 primarily due to the increase in our average IIF from ~~$118.7 billion at June 30, 2018 to~~ $148.2 billion at June 30, 2019 ~~partially offset by a decrease in~~to $168.6 billion at June 30, 2020. The average net premium rate ~~from 0.51% for the three months ended June 30, 2018 to~~was 0.48% and 0.49% for the three months ended June 30, ~~2019. Net premiums earned increased in the six months ended June 30,~~2020 and 2019, by 18% compared to the six months ended June 30, 2018 due to the increase in our average IIF from $115.9 billion at June 30, 2018 to $144.3 billion at June 30, 2019, partially offset by a decrease in the average net premium rate from 0.51% in the six months ended June 30, 2018 to 0.48% in the six months ended June 30, 2019. The decrease in the average net premium rate during the three and six months ended June 30, 2019 is primarily due torespectively, as an increase in ceded premiums, ~~ceded under third-party reinsurance agreements, partially~~changes in the mix of mortgages we insure and changes in our pricing were largely offset by an increase in premiums earned on the cancellation of non-refundable single premium ~~policies~~policies. Net premiums earned increased in the ~~respective periods, along with changes~~six months ended June 30, 2020 by 14% compared to the six months ended June 30, 2019 due to the increase in our average IIF from $144.3 billion at June 30, 2019 to $166.9 billion at June 30, 2020. The average net premium rate was 0.48% in each of the six months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019 as an increase in ceded premiums was offset by an increase in premiums earned on the cancellation of non-refundable single premium policies. In the three and six months ended June 30, 2020, ceded premiums increased to $22.1 million and $36.4 million, respectively, from $8.4 million and $14.5 million in the ~~mix~~three and six months ended June 30, 2019, respectively, due to reduced profit commission under our QSR Agreement as a result of higher ceded losses, new third-party reinsurance agreements entered in 2020 and a full three and six months of premiums ceded under third-party reinsurance agreements entered in 2019. In the three and six months ended June 30, 2020, premiums earned on the cancellation of non-refundable single premium policies increased to $26.7 million and $41.3 million, respectively, from $8.8 million and $13.1 million in the three and six months ended June 30, 2019, respectively, as a result of an increase in existing borrowers refinancing their mortgages ~~we insure and changes in our pricing.~~due to favorable mortgage interest rates.

Net premiums written increased by 9% in the three and six months ended June 30, 2020 compared to the three and six months ended June 30, 2019 ~~by 12%, compared to the three months ended June 30, 2018~~ primarily due to ~~the~~an increase in average IIF ~~for~~in the ~~three months ended June 30, 2019 as compared to the same period in 2018,~~respective periods, partially offset by an increase

in premiums ceded under third-party reinsurance agreements, a decrease in new single premium policies written, ~~an increase in premiums ceded under third-party reinsurance agreements,~~ changes in the mix of mortgages we insure and changes in our pricing. Net premiums written increased in the six months ended June 30, 2019 by 10%, compared to the six months ended June 30, 2018 primarily due to the increase in average IIF for the six months ended June 30, 2019, as compared to the same period in 2018, partially offset by an increase in premiums ceded under third-party reinsurance agreements in the six months ended June 30, 2019.

In the three months ended June 30, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018,~~2019, unearned premiums decreased by ~~$0.1~~$5.6 million and ~~increased by $11.4~~$0.1 million, respectively. The change in unearned premiums was a result of net premiums written on single premium policies of ~~$26.5~~$36.8 million and ~~$31.7~~$26.5 million, respectively, which was ~~partially~~ offset by ~~$26.6~~$42.4 million and ~~$20.3~~$26.6 million, respectively, of unearned premium that was recognized in earnings during the periods. In the six months ended June 30, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018,~~2019, unearned premiums decreased by ~~$0.2~~$20.3 million and ~~increased by $24.1~~$0.2 million, respectively. This was a result of net premiums written on single premium policies of ~~$46.5~~$52.9 million and ~~$62.9~~$46.5 million, respectively, which was ~~partially~~ offset by ~~$46.7~~$73.2 million and ~~$38.8~~$46.7 million, respectively, of unearned premium that was recognized in earnings during the periods.

Net Investment Income

Our net investment income was derived from the following sources for the periods indicated:


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,						Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
(In thousands)	2019			2018			2019			2018			2020			2019			2020			2019
Fixed maturities	$	20,180		$	14,496		$	39,923		$	28,139		$	20,569		$	20,180		$	41,183		$	39,923
Short-term investments	1,310			1,298			2,368			2,049			358			1,310			1,480			2,368
Gross investment income	21,490			15,794			42,291			30,188			20,927			21,490			42,663			42,291
Investment expenses	(909		)	(660		)	(1,830		)	(1,340		)	(1,061		)	(909		)	(2,164		)	(1,830		)
Net investment income	$	20,581		$	15,134		$	40,461		$	28,848		$	19,866		$	20,581		$	40,499		$	40,461

The ~~increase~~changes in net investment income for the three and six months ended June 30, ~~2019~~2020 as compared to the same periods in ~~2018~~2019 was due to a decrease in the pre-tax investment income yield partially offset by the increase in the weighted average balance of our investment ~~portfolio and the increase in the pre-tax investment income yield.~~portfolio. The average cash and investment portfolio balance increased to $3.9 billion for the three months ended June 30, 2020 from $3.0 billion for the three months ended June 30, ~~2019 from $2.6 billion for the three months ended June 30, 2018.~~2019. The average cash and investment portfolio balance ~~was~~increased to $3.7 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2020 from $3.0 billion for the six months ended June 30, ~~2019 compared to $2.5 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2018.~~2019. The increase in the average cash and investment portfolio ~~in both periods~~ was primarily due to investing cash flows from ~~operations.~~operations, proceeds from the public offering of common shares completed in June 2020 and increased borrowings under the Credit Facility. The pre-tax investment income yield ~~increased~~decreased from ~~2.5% and 2.4% in the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively, to~~ 2.8% in each of the three and six months ended June 30, 2019 to 2.2% and 2.3% in the three and six months ended June 30, 2020, respectively, primarily due to an increase in ~~short-term market~~the share of our investments allocated to cash, a general decline in investment yields due to declining interest rates and an increase in ~~the portion of our investment portfolio invested in spread~~premium amortization on mortgage-backed and ~~duration assets.~~asset-backed securities. The pre-tax investment income yields are calculated based on amortized cost and exclude investment expenses. See “— Liquidity and Capital Resources” for further details of our investment portfolio.

Other Income

Other income ~~includes fees earned~~ for ~~information technology and customer support services provided~~the three months ended June 30, 2020 was $6.0 million as compared to ~~Triad, contract underwriting revenues, underwriting consulting services~~$2.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2019. The increase in other income for the three months ended June 30, 2020 as compared to ~~third-party reinsurers and changes~~the same period in ~~the~~2019 was primarily due to a favorable increase in fair value of embedded derivatives contained in certain of our reinsurance ~~agreements.~~agreements and an increase in fees earned for information technology and customer support services provided to Triad. Other income for the six months ended June 30, 2020 was $4.6 million compared to $4.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2019. The ~~increases~~increase in other income for the six months ended June 30, 2020 as compared to the same period in 2019 was primarily due to an increase in Triad service fees partially offset by a net unfavorable decrease in the fair value of the embedded derivatives. In the three and six months ended June 30, 2020 we earned Triad service fees of $1.6 million and $3.2 million, respectively, compared to $0.2 million and $0.4 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019, asrespectively. Effective December 1, 2019, the Triad services agreement was amended providing for a flat monthly fee through November 30, 2021. In the three months ended June 30, 2020, we recorded a favorable increase in the fair value of these embedded derivatives of $2.5 million compared to ~~the same periods~~a favorable increase in ~~2018 were primarily due to~~ the ~~increases in~~ fair value of the embedded derivatives ~~partially offset by decreases~~of $1.2 million in the three months ended June 30, 2019. In the six months ended June 30, 2020 we recorded a net unfavorable decrease in the fair value of the embedded derivatives of $1.7 million compared to a favorable increase of $2.6 million the six months ended June 30, 2019. Other income also includes contract underwriting ~~revenues.~~revenues and underwriting consulting services to third-party reinsurers.

Provision for Losses and Loss Adjustment Expenses

The provision for losses and LAE was $5.0 million and $1.8 million in the three months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively, and $12.1 million and $7.1 million in the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The increasesincrease in the provision for losses and LAE in the three and six months ended June 30, ~~2019~~2020 as compared to the same periods in ~~2018 were~~2019 was primarily due to ~~increases~~an increase in ~~the number of insured loans in default in the current period and were also impacted by changes in the age and composition of the insured loans in default.~~ defaults related to COVID-19.

The following table presents a rollforward of insured loans in default for our U.S. mortgage insurance portfolio for the periods indicated:


	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,				Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2019		2018		2019		2018		2020		2019		2020		2019
Beginning default inventory	4,096		4,442		4,024		4,783		5,841		4,096		5,947		4,024
Plus: new defaults	2,849		1,701		5,767		3,695		37,357		2,849		41,290		5,767
Less: cures	(2,433	)	(2,572	)	(5,182	)	(4,842	)	(4,983	)	(2,433	)	(8,897	)	(5,182	)
Less: claims paid	(106	)	(52	)	(194	)	(115	)	(144	)	(106	)	(262	)	(194	)
Less: rescissions and denials, net	(1	)	—		(10	)	(2	)	(3	)	(1	)	(10	)	(10	)
Ending default inventory	4,405		3,519		4,405		3,519		38,068		4,405		38,068		4,405

~~The increase in the number~~As of ~~defaults at~~ June 30, ~~2019 compared to June 30, 2018 was primarily due to~~2020, the ~~increase in our IIF and policies in force, partially offset by the previously identified hurricane-related~~ending default inventory included 34,352 defaults that have cured subsequent to June 30, 2018 and further seasoning of our insurance portfolio. A total of 663 previously identified hurricane-related defaults cured between July 1, 2018 and December 31, 2018.classified as COVID-19 defaults.

The following table includes additional information about our loans in default as of the dates ~~indicated:~~

indicated for our U.S. mortgage insurance portfolio:


	As of June 30,						As of June 30,
	2019			2018			2020			2019
Case reserves (in thousands)(1)	$	50,576		$	45,773		$	227,786		$	50,576
Total reserves (in thousands)(1)	$	55,138		$	50,016		$	250,862		$	55,138
Ending default inventory	4,405			3,519			38,068			4,405
Average case reserve per default (in thousands)	$	11.5		$	13.0		$	6.0		$	11.5
Average total reserve per default (in thousands)	$	12.5		$	14.2		$	6.6		$	12.5
Default rate	0.66		%	0.64		%	5.19		%	0.66		%
Claims received included in ending default inventory	82			33			77			82


(1)	The U.S. mortgage insurance portfolio reserves exclude reserves on GSE and other risk share risk in force at Essent Re of $28 thousand as of June 30, 2020.

The decrease in the average ~~case~~total reserve per default was primarily due to ~~changes~~a lower total reserve per COVID-19 default. Based on the forbearance programs in place and the ~~composition (such as mark-to-market loan-to-value ratios,~~credit characteristics of the COVID-19 defaulted loans, we expect the ultimate number of COVID-19-related defaults that result in claims will be less than our historical default-to-claim experience. Accordingly, we recorded a reserve equal to approximately 7% of the risk in force for the COVID-19 default notices received in the three months ended June 30, 2020, compared to approximately a 9% reserve estimate for defaults that had missed three payments or less as of June 30, 2019. The reserve for losses and ~~number of months past due) of the underlying loans in default and improvements in economic fundamentals.~~LAE on COVID-19 defaults was $189.0 million at June 30, 2020.

The following ~~tables provide~~table provides a reconciliation of the beginning and ending reserve balances for losses and ~~LAE and~~LAE:



	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
(In thousands)	2020			2019			2020			2019
Reserve for losses and LAE at beginning of period	$	73,341		$	53,484		$	69,362		$	49,464
Less: Reinsurance recoverables	98			—			71			—
Net reserve for losses and LAE at beginning of period	73,243			53,484			69,291			49,464
Add provision for losses and LAE occurring in:
Current period	181,776			11,354			197,195			23,182
Prior years	(5,899		)	(6,394		)	(13,255		)	(11,115		)
Incurred losses and LAE during the current period	175,877			4,960			183,940			12,067
Deduct payments for losses and LAE occurring in:
Current period	288			230			289			245
Prior years	5,703			3,076			9,813			6,148
Loss and LAE payments during the current period	5,991			3,306			10,102			6,393
Net reserve for losses and LAE at end of period	243,129			55,138			243,129			55,138
Plus: Reinsurance recoverables	7,761			—			7,761			—
Reserve for losses and LAE at end of period	$	250,890		$	55,138		$	250,890		$	55,138

The following tables provide a detail of reserves and defaulted RIF by the number of missed payments and pending ~~claims:~~

claims for our U.S. mortgage insurance portfolio:

Three Months Ended June 30, Six Months Ended June 30,
(In thousands) 2019 2018 2019 2018
Reserve for losses and LAE at beginning of period $ 53,484
$ 49,966
$ 49,464
$ 46,850
Add provision for losses and LAE occurring in:
Current period 11,354
6,576
23,182
16,528
Prior years (6,394 ) (4,763 ) (11,115 ) (9,406 )
Incurred losses and LAE during the current period 4,960
1,813
12,067
7,122
Deduct payments for losses and LAE occurring in:
Current period 230
211
245
211
Prior years 3,076
1,552
6,148
3,745
Loss and LAE payments during the current period 3,306
1,763
6,393
3,956
Reserve for losses and LAE at end of period $ 55,138
$ 50,016
$ 55,138
$ 50,016



	As of June 30, 2020
($ in thousands)	Number of Policies in Default	Percentage of Policies in Default		Amount of Reserves		Percentage of Reserves		Defaulted RIF		Reserves as a Percentage of Defaulted RIF
Missed payments:
Three payments or less	33,514	88	%	$	166,897	73	%	$	2,233,678	7	%
Four to eleven payments	3,813	10		39,028		17		234,152		17
Twelve or more payments	664	2		18,590		8		36,694		51
Pending claims	77	—		3,271		2		3,846		85
Total case reserves (1)	38,068	100	%	227,786		100	%	$	2,508,370	9
IBNR				17,084
LAE				5,992
Total reserves for losses and LAE (1)				$	250,862


(1)	The U.S. mortgage insurance portfolio reserves exclude reserves on GSE and other risk share risk in force at Essent Re of $28 thousand as of June 30, 2020.



	As of June 30, 2019
($ in thousands)	Number of Policies in Default	Percentage of Policies in Default		Amount of Reserves		Percentage of Reserves		Defaulted RIF		Reserves as a Percentage of Defaulted RIF
Missed payments:
Three payments or less	2,511	57	%	$	12,646	25	%	$	133,536	9	%
Four to eleven payments	1,443	33		22,292		44		78,047		29
Twelve or more payments	369	8		11,583		23		22,093		52
Pending claims	82	2		4,055		8		4,657		87
Total case reserves	4,405	100	%	50,576		100	%	$	238,333	21
IBNR				3,792
LAE				770
Total reserves for losses and LAE				$	55,138

As of June 30, 2019
($ in thousands) Number of
Policies in
Default Percentage of
Policies in
Default Amount of
Reserves Percentage of
Reserves Defaulted
RIF Reserves as a
Percentage of
Defaulted RIF
Missed payments:

Three payments or less 2,511
57 % $ 12,646
25 % $ 133,536
9 %
Four to eleven payments 1,443
33
22,292
44
78,047
29
Twelve or more payments 369
8
11,583
23
22,093
52
Pending claims 82
2
4,055
8
4,657
87
Total case reserves 4,405
100 % 50,576
100 % $ 238,333
21
IBNR

3,792

LAE and other

770

Total reserves for losses and LAE

$ 55,138

As of June 30, 2018
($ in thousands)
Number of
Policies in
Default

Percentage of
Policies in
Default

Amount of
Reserves

Percentage of
Reserves

Defaulted
RIF

Reserves as a
Percentage of
Defaulted RIF
Missed payments:

Three payments or less 1,543
44 % $ 9,077
20 % $ 84,685
11 %
Four to eleven payments 1,675
47
26,688
58
96,627
28
Twelve or more payments 268
8
8,368
18
14,476
58
Pending claims 33
1
1,640
4
1,946
84
Total case reserves 3,519
100 % 45,773
100 % $ 197,734
23
IBNR

3,433

LAE and other

810

Total reserves for losses and LAE

$ 50,016

During the three months ended June 30, 2020, the provision for losses and LAE was $175.9 million, comprised of $181.8 million of current year losses partially offset by $5.9 million of favorable prior years’ loss development. During the three months ended June 30, 2019, the provision for losses and LAE was $5.0 million, comprised of $11.4 million of current year losses partially offset by $6.4 million of favorable prior years’ loss development. During the three months ended June 30, 2018, the provision for losses and LAE was $1.8 million, comprised of $6.6 million of current year losses partially offset by $4.8 million of favorable prior years’ loss development. In both periods, the prior years’ loss development was the result of a re-estimation of amounts ultimately to be paid on prior year defaults in the default inventory, including the impact of previously identified defaults that cured.

During the six months ended June 30, 2020, the provision for losses and LAE was $183.9 million, comprised of $197.2 million of current year losses partially offset by $13.3 million of favorable prior years’ loss development. During the six months ended June 30, 2019, the provision for losses and LAE was $12.1 million, comprised of $23.2 million of current year losses partially offset by $11.1 million of favorable prior years’ loss development. During the six months ended June 30, 2018, the provision for losses and LAE was $7.1 million, comprised of $16.5 million of current year losses partially offset by $9.4 million of favorable prior years’ loss development. In both periods, the prior years’ loss development was the result of a re-estimation of amounts ultimately to be paid on prior year defaults in the default inventory, including the impact of previously identified defaults that cured.

The following table includes additional information about our claims paid and claim severity ~~as of~~for the ~~dates~~periods indicated:


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,						Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
($ in thousands)	2019			2018			2019			2018			2020			2019			2020			2019
Number of claims paid	106			52			194			115			144			106			262			194
Amount of claims paid	$	3,208		$	1,676		$	6,107		$	3,819		$	5,718		$	3,208		$	9,875		$	6,107
Claim severity	69		%	64		%	74		%	70		%	78		%	69		%	78		%	74		%

Other Underwriting and Operating Expenses

Following are the components of our other underwriting and operating expenses for the periods indicated:


	Three Months Ended June 30,								Six Months Ended June 30,								Three Months Ended June 30,								Six Months Ended June 30,
	2019				2018				2019				2018				2020				2019				2020				2019
($ in thousands)	$		%		$		%		$		%		$		%		$		%		$		%		$		%		$		%
Compensation and benefits	$	23,167	56	%	$	22,285	61	%	$	46,516	56	%	$	45,850	62	%	$	24,174	62	%	$	23,167	56	%	$	49,040	61	%	$	46,516	56	%
Premium taxes																	4,963		13		4,291		10		9,396		12		8,369		10
Other	18,353		44		14,143		39		36,034		44		28,702		38		9,682		25		14,062		34		22,330		28		27,665		34
Total other underwriting and operating expenses	$	41,520	100	%	$	36,428	100	%	$	82,550	100	%	$	74,552	100	%	$	38,819	100	%	$	41,520	100	%	$	80,766	100	%	$	82,550	100	%

Number of employees at end of period											383				392												389				383

The significant factors contributing to the change in other underwriting and operating expenses are:

Compensation and benefits increased in the three and six months ended June 30, 2020 as compared to the three and six months ended June 30, 2019 ~~as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2018~~ primarily due to ~~an increase in~~increased stock compensation expense associated with shares granted in 2019 and 2020 and increased salaries and overtime associated with our increased NIW. Compensation and benefits increased in the six months ended June 30, 2019 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2018 due to an increase in stock compensation expense associated with shares granted in 2018 and 2019 and increased overtime associated with our increased NIW, partially offset by a decrease in payroll taxes associated with the full vesting of stock grants issued in 2013 and 2014 during the six months ended June 30, 2018. Compensation and benefits includes salaries, wages and bonus, stock compensation expense, benefits and payroll taxes.

Premium taxes increased primarily due to an increase in premiums written.

Other expenses ~~increased~~decreased primarily as a result of ceding commission earned under the ~~continued expansion of our business.~~QSR Agreement and lower travel expenses. Other expenses include ~~premium taxes,~~professional fees, travel, marketing, hardware, software, rent, depreciation and amortization and other facilities expenses.

Interest Expense

For the three and six months ended June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, we incurred interest expense of ~~$2.7~~$2.6 million and ~~$5.3~~$4.7 million, respectively, as compared to ~~$2.6~~$2.7 million and ~~$5.1~~$5.3 million for the three and six months ended June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, respectively. The ~~increase in both periods was~~decreases were primarily due to ~~an increase~~a decrease in the weighted average interest rate for borrowings outstanding, partially offset by ~~a decrease~~

an increase in the average amounts outstanding under the Credit Facility. ~~As of~~For the three and six months ended June 30, ~~2019~~2020, the average amount outstanding under the Credit Facility was $425.0 million and ~~2018,~~$330.5 million, respectively, as compared to $225.0 million for each of the three and six months ended June 30, 2019. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2020, the borrowings under the Credit Facility had a weighted average interest rate of ~~4.41%~~2.30% and ~~4.05%~~2.61%, ~~respectively. For each of~~respectively, as compared to 4.56% and 4.53% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019, ~~the average amount outstanding under the Credit Facility was $225.0 million as compared to $250.9 million and $255.6 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018,~~ respectively.

Income Taxes

Our subsidiaries in the United States file a consolidated U.S. Federal income tax return. ~~For interim reporting periods, we use an annual effective tax rate method required under GAAP to calculate the income tax provision.~~ Our income tax expense was ~~$26.3~~$3.4 million and ~~$21.2~~$26.3 million for the three months ended June 30, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018,~~2019, respectively, and ~~$48.3~~$30.6 million and ~~$31.7~~$48.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, ~~and 2018,~~ respectively. ~~Income tax expense for~~For the ~~three and~~ six months ended June 30, 2020, our provision for income taxes was not based on an estimated annual effective rate due to uncertainty regarding the potential impacts of COVID-19 on our results of operations. Accordingly, we were unable to make a reliable estimate of pretax income and the annual effective tax rate for the full year 2020, and the provision for income taxes for the six months ended June 30, 2020 was based on the actual effective tax rate of 15.7% for the year to date period. For the six months ended June 30, 2019, our income tax expense was calculated using an estimated annual effective tax rate of 16.1%~~, as compared to 16.2% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018.~~. For the six months ended June 30, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018,~~2019, income tax expense was reduced by excess tax benefits associated with the vesting of common shares and common share units of ~~$2.0~~$0.6 million and ~~$9.6~~$2.0 million, respectively. The tax effects associated with the vesting of common shares and common share units are treated as discrete items in the reporting period in which they occur and are not considered in ~~determining~~ the 2019 estimated annual effective tax ~~rate.~~rate above.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Overview

Our sources of funds consist primarily of:

our investment portfolio and interest income on the portfolio;

net premiums that we will receive from our existing IIF as well as policies that we write in the future;

borrowings under our Credit Facility; and

issuance of capital shares.

Our obligations consist primarily of:

claim payments under our policies;

interest payments and repayment of borrowings under our Credit Facility; ~~and~~

the other costs and operating expenses of our ~~business.~~business; and

the payment of dividends on our common shares.

As of June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, we had substantial liquidity with cash of ~~$25.3~~$72.8 million, short-term investments of ~~$251.5 million~~$1.1 billion and fixed maturity investments of ~~$2.8~~$3.2 billion. We also had ~~$275~~$75 million available capacity under the revolving credit component of our Credit Facility, with ~~$225~~$425 million of ~~term~~ borrowings outstanding under our Credit Facility. Borrowings under the Credit Facility contractually mature on May 17, 2021. In June 2020, we completed a public offering of 13.8 million common shares to strengthen our capital resources and provide financial flexibility. Net proceeds from this offering were approximately $440 million. At June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, net cash and investments at the holding company were ~~$72.0~~$702.2 million. In addition, Essent Guaranty is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh (the “FHLBank”) and has access to secured borrowing capacity with the FHLBank to provide Essent Guaranty with supplemental liquidity. Essent Guaranty had no outstanding borrowings with the FHLBank at June 30, ~~2019. In August 2019, the Company announced that its Board of Directors declared Essent's inaugural quarterly cash dividend of $0.15 per common share payable in September 2019.~~2020.

Management believes that the Company has sufficient liquidity available both at the holding company and in its insurance and other operating subsidiaries to meet its operating cash needs and obligations and committed capital expenditures for the next 12 months.

While the Company and all of its subsidiaries are expected to have sufficient liquidity to meet all their expected obligations, additional capital may be required to meet any new capital requirements that are adopted by regulatory authorities or the GSEs, or to respond to changes in the business or economic environment related to COVID-19, or to provide additional capital related to the growth of our risk in force in our mortgage insurance portfolio, or to fund new business initiatives including the insurance activities of Essent Re. We continually evaluate opportunities based upon market conditions to further increase our financial flexibility through the issuance of equity or debt, or other options including reinsurance or credit risk transfer transactions. There can be no guarantee that any such opportunities will be available on acceptable terms or at all.

At the operating subsidiary level, liquidity could be impacted by any one of the following factors:

significant decline in the value of our investments;

inability to sell investment assets to provide cash to fund operating needs;

decline in expected revenues generated from operations;

increase in expected claim payments related to our IIF; or

increase in operating expenses.

Our U.S. insurance subsidiaries are subject to certain capital and dividend rules and regulations prescribed by jurisdictions in which they are authorized to operate and the GSEs. Under the insurance laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, the insurance subsidiaries may pay dividends during any twelve-month period in an amount equal to the greater of (i) 10% of the preceding year-end statutory policyholders' surplus or (ii) the preceding year’s statutory net income. The Pennsylvania statute also requires that dividends and other distributions be paid out of positive unassigned surplus without prior approval. At June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, Essent Guaranty had unassigned surplus of approximately ~~$235.0~~$298.5 million. Essent Guaranty of PA, Inc. (“Essent PA") had unassigned surplus of approximately ~~$12.2~~$14.4 million as of June 30, ~~2019.~~2020. As a result of PMIERs guidance issued by the GSEs, effective June 30, 2020 through March 31, 2021, Essent Guaranty is required to obtain GSE written approval before paying a dividend. Essent Re is subject to certain dividend restrictions as prescribed by the Bermuda Monetary Authority and under certain agreements with counterparties. In connection with a quota share reinsurance agreement with Essent Guaranty, Essent Re has agreed to maintain a minimum total equity of $100 million. As of June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, Essent Re had total equity of ~~$899.1 million.~~$1.0 billion. In connection with its insurance and

reinsurance activities, Essent Re is required to maintain assets in trusts for the benefit of its contractual counterparties. See Note 3 to our condensed consolidated financial statements. At June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, our insurance subsidiaries were in compliance with these rules, regulations and agreements.

Cash Flows

The following table summarizes our consolidated cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities:


	Six Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
(In thousands)	2019			2018			2020			2019
Net cash provided by operating activities	$	265,484		$	342,656		$	345,785		$	265,484
Net cash used in investing activities	(296,935		)	(304,867		)	(944,893		)	(296,935		)
Net cash used in financing activities	(8,240		)	(56,649		)
Net decrease in cash	$	(39,691	)	$	(18,860	)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities							600,545			(8,240		)
Net increase (decrease) in cash							$	1,437		$	(39,691	)

Operating Activities

Cash flow provided by operating activities totaled $345.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2020, as compared to $265.5 million for the six months ended June 30, ~~2019, as compared to $342.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018.~~2019. The ~~decrease~~increase in cash flow provided by operating activities of ~~$77.2~~$80.3 million was primarily due ~~the net decrease in United States Mortgage Guaranty Tax and Loss Bonds (“T&L Bonds”) during 2018, partially offset by increases~~to an increase in premiums collected, lower income tax payments and lower T&L Bond purchases during ~~2019.~~2020.

Investing Activities

Cash flow used in investing activities totaled ~~$296.9~~$944.9 million and ~~$304.9~~$296.9 million for the six months ended June 30, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018,~~2019, respectively. In both periods, cash flow used in investing activities ~~primarily~~ related to investing cash flows from

operations. Additionally, in 2020 cash flow used in investing activities included investing $440 million of net proceeds from the completion of a public offering of common shares in June and $200 million of increased borrowings under the Credit Facility.

Financing Activities

Cash flow provided by financing activities totaled $600.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2020, primarily related to $440 million of net proceeds from the completion of a public offering of common shares in June and $200 million of increased borrowings under the Credit Facility partially offset by the quarterly cash dividends paid in March and June and treasury stock acquired from employees to satisfy tax withholding obligations. Cash flow used in financing activities totaled $8.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2019 primarily related to treasury stock acquired from employees to satisfy tax withholding obligations. Cash flow used in financing activities totaled $56.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018, primarily related to treasury stock acquired from employees to satisfy tax withholding obligations and $25 million of net repayments of borrowings under the Credit Facility.

Insurance Company Capital

We compute a risk-to-capital ratio for our U.S. insurance companies on a separate company statutory basis, as well as for our combined insurance operations. The risk-to-capital ratio is our net risk in force divided by our statutory capital. Our net risk in force represents risk in force net of reinsurance ceded, if any, and net of exposures on policies for which loss reserves have been established. Statutory capital consists primarily of statutory policyholders’ surplus (which increases as a result of statutory net income and decreases as a result of statutory net loss and dividends paid), plus the statutory contingency reserve. The statutory contingency reserve is reported as a liability on the statutory balance sheet. A mortgage insurance company is required to make annual contributions to the contingency reserve of 50% of net premiums earned. These contributions must generally be maintained for a period of ten years. However, with regulatory approval, a mortgage insurance company may make early withdrawals from the contingency reserve when incurred losses exceed 35% of net premiums earned in a calendar year.

During the six months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, no capital contributions were made to our U.S. insurance subsidiaries. During the six months ended June 30, 2018, Essent US Holdings, Inc. ("Essent Holdings") made capital contributions to Essent Guaranty of $15 million to support new and existing business and Essent Guaranty paid a dividend to Essent Holdings of $40 million which was used to pay down the borrowings remaining under the revolving component of the Credit Facility.

Essent Guaranty has entered into reinsurance agreements that provide excess of loss reinsurance coverage for new defaults on portfolios of mortgage insurance policies issued in 2015 through ~~2018.~~2019. The aggregate excess of loss reinsurance coverages decrease over a ten-year period as the underlying covered mortgages amortize. Based on the level of delinquencies reported to us, the insurance-linked note transactions that Essent Guaranty has entered into to date (the “ILNs”) became subject to a "trigger event" as of June 25, 2020. The aggregate excess of loss reinsurance coverage will not amortize during the continuation of a trigger event. Effective September 1, 2019, Essent Guaranty entered into a quota share reinsurance agreement with a panel of third-party reinsurers (the "QSR Agreement"). Under the QSR Agreement, Essent Guaranty will cede premiums earned related to 40% of risk on eligible single premium policies and 20% of risk on all other eligible policies written September 1, 2019 through December 31, 2020, in exchange for reimbursement of ceded claims and claims expenses on covered policies, a 20% ceding commission, and a profit commission of up to 60% that varies directly and inversely with ceded claims. These reinsurance coverages also

reduces net risk in force and PMIERs Minimum Required Assets. See Note 4 to our condensed consolidated financial statements.

Our combined risk-to-capital calculation for our U.S. insurance subsidiaries as of June 30, ~~2019~~2020 was as follows:


Combined statutory capital: ($ in thousands)
Policyholders’ surplus	$	991,756	$	1,057,420
Contingency reserves	1,100,151		1,399,948
Combined statutory capital	$	2,091,907	$	2,457,368
Combined net risk in force	$	28,459,376	$	28,787,600
Combined risk-to-capital ratio	13.6:1		11.7:1

For additional information regarding regulatory capital, see Note 1215 to our condensed consolidated financial statements. Our combined statutory capital equals the sum of statutory capital of Essent Guaranty plus Essent PA, after eliminating the impact of intercompany transactions. The combined risk-to-capital ratio equals the sum of the net risk in force of Essent Guaranty and Essent PA divided by combined statutory capital. The information above has been derived from the annual and quarterly statements of our insurance subsidiaries, which have been prepared in conformity with accounting practices prescribed or permitted by the Pennsylvania Insurance Department and the National Association of Insurance

Commissioners Accounting Practices and Procedures Manual. Such practices vary from accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

Essent Re has entered into GSE and other risk share transactions, including insurance and reinsurance transactions with Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae. Essent Re also reinsures 25% of Essent Guaranty’s NIW under a quota share reinsurance agreement. During the six months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, Essent Re paid no dividends to Essent Group and Essent Group made no capital contributions to Essent Re. As of June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, Essent Re had total stockholders’ equity of ~~$899.1 million~~$1.0 billion and net risk in force of ~~$9.3~~$11.1 billion.

Financial Strength Ratings

The insurer financial strength rating of Essent Guaranty, our principal mortgage insurance subsidiary, is rated ~~Baa1~~A3 with a stable outlook by ~~Moody's,~~Moody’s Investors Service (“Moody's”), BBB+ with a ~~stable~~negative outlook by S&P and A (Excellent) with stable outlook by A.M. Best. The insurer financial strength rating of Essent Re is BBB+ with a ~~stable~~negative outlook by S&P and A (Excellent) with stable outlook by A.M. Best.

Private Mortgage Insurer Eligibility Requirements

Effective December 31, 2015, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, at the direction of the FHFA, implemented new coordinated Private Mortgage Insurer Eligibility Requirements, which we refer to as the "PMIERs." The PMIERs represent the standards by which private mortgage insurers are eligible to provide mortgage insurance on loans owned or guaranteed by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. The PMIERs include financial strength requirements incorporating a risk-based framework that require approved insurers to have a sufficient level of liquid assets from which to pay claims. This risk-based framework provides that an insurer must hold a substantially higher level of required assets for insured loans that are in default compared to a performing loan. The PMIERs also include enhanced operational performance expectations and define remedial actions that apply should an approved insurer fail to comply with these requirements. In 2018, the GSEs released revised PMIERs framework ("PMIERs 2.0") which became effective on March 31, 2019. As of June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, Essent Guaranty, our GSE-approved mortgage insurance company, was in compliance with PMIERs 2.0. As of June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, Essent Guaranty's Available Assets were ~~$2.09~~$2.59 billion and its Minimum Required Assets were ~~$1.18~~$1.46 billion based on our interpretation of PMIERs 2.0.

Under PMIERs guidance issued by the GSEs effective June 30, 2020, Essent will apply a 0.30 multiplier to the risk-based required asset amount factor for each insured loan in default backed by a property located in a Federal Emergency Management Agency (“FEMA”) Declared Major Disaster Area eligible for Individual Assistance and that either 1) is subject to a forbearance plan granted in response to a FEMA Declared Major Disaster, the terms of which are materially consistent with terms of forbearance plans, repayment plans or loan modification trial period offered by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac, or 2) has an initial missed payment occurring up to either (i) 30 days prior to the first day of the incident period specified in the FEMA Major Disaster Declaration or (ii) 90 days following the last day of the incident period specified in the FEMA Major Disaster Declaration, not to exceed 180 days from the first day of the incident period specified in the FEMA Major Disaster Declaration. In the case of the foregoing, the 0.30 multiplier shall be applied to the risk-based required asset amount factor for each insured loan in default for no longer than four calendar months from the initial missed payment absent a forbearance plan described in 1) above. Further, under temporary provisions provided by the PMIERs guidance, Essent will apply a 0.30 multiplier to the risk-based required asset amount factor for each insured loan in default backed by a property that has an initial missed payment occurring on or after March 1, 2020 and prior to January 1, 2021 (COVID-19 Crisis Period). The 0.30 multiplier will be applicable for insured loans in default 1) subject to a forbearance plan granted in response to a financial hardship related to COVID-19 (which shall be assumed to be the case for any loan that has an initial missed payment occurring during the COVID-19 Crisis Period and is subject to a forbearance plan, repayment plan or loan modification trial period), the terms of which are materially consistent with terms offered by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac or 2) for up to four calendar months after the initial missed payment absent a forbearance plan. The 34,352 COVID-19 defaults included in our June 30, 2020 default inventory fall into categories 1) and 2) above and received the 0.30 multiplier in calculating the PMIERs required assets.

Financial Condition

Stockholders’ Equity

As of June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, stockholders’ equity was ~~$2.7~~$3.6 billion, compared to ~~$2.4~~$3.0 billion as of December 31, ~~2018.~~2019. This increase was primarily due to the completion of a public offering of common shares in June 2020, net income generated in ~~2019~~2020 and an increase in accumulated other comprehensive income related to an increase in our unrealized investment gains.

Investments

As of June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, investments totaled ~~$3.2~~$4.4 billion compared to ~~$2.8~~$3.4 billion as of December 31, ~~2018.~~2019. In addition, our total cash was ~~$25.3~~$72.8 million as of June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, compared to ~~$64.9~~$71.4 million as of December 31, ~~2018.~~2019. The increase in investments was primarily due to investing net cash flows from operations, the net proceeds from the public offering of common shares and the borrowings under the Credit Facility during the six months ended June 30, ~~2019.~~2020.

Investments Available for Sale by Asset Class


Asset Class	June 30, 2019				December 31, 2018				June 30, 2020				December 31, 2019
($ in thousands)	Fair Value		Percent		Fair Value		Percent		Fair Value		Percent		Fair Value		Percent
U.S. Treasury securities	$	305,152	9.8	%	$	289,892	10.5	%	$	259,259	5.9	%	$	242,206	7.2	%
U.S. agency securities	33,473		1.1		32,997		1.2		14,682		0.3		33,605		1.0
U.S. agency mortgage-backed securities	724,382		23.4		637,178		23.1		830,124		19.1		848,334		25.3
Municipal debt securities(1)	402,715		13.0		483,879		17.5		465,063		10.7		361,638		10.8
Non-U.S. government securities	47,670		1.5		45,001		1.6		54,637		1.2		54,995		1.7
Corporate debt securities(2)	774,506		25.0		725,201		26.3		912,137		21.0		880,301		26.3
Residential and commercial mortgage securities	250,793		8.1		121,838		4.4		312,511		7.2		288,281		8.6
Asset-backed securities	352,053		11.3		284,997		10.3		385,486		8.9		326,025		9.7
Money market funds	209,470		6.8		139,083		5.1		1,118,204		25.7		315,362		9.4
Total Investments Available for Sale	$	3,100,214	100.0	%	$	2,760,066	100.0	%	$	4,352,103	100.0	%	$	3,350,747	100.0	%


	June 30,		December 31,		June 30,		December 31,
(1) The following table summarizes municipal debt securities as of :	2019		2018		2020		2019
Special revenue bonds	70.1	%	69.0	%	74.3	%	74.5	%
General obligation bonds	24.7		26.0		22.2		21.3
Certificate of participation bonds	4.4		3.6		2.8		3.4
Tax allocation bonds	0.8		0.9		0.7		0.8
Special tax bonds	—		0.5
Total	100.0	%	100.0	%	100.0	%	100.0	%


	June 30,		December 31,		June 30,		December 31,
(2) The following table summarizes corporate debt securities as of :	2019		2018		2020		2019
Financial	35.9	%	37.1	%	35.0	%	34.4	%
Consumer, non-cyclical	21.4		20.7		20.8		20.1
Communications	11.4		12.6		10.9		10.3
Energy					7.6		8.3
Consumer, cyclical	7.1		7.6		7.2		7.6
Energy	6.3		5.7
Utilities	5.2		5.0		6.2		6.2
Technology					5.5		4.8
Industrial	4.9		4.7		3.5		4.2
Technology	4.5		3.1
Basic materials	3.3		3.5		3.3		4.1
Total	100.0	%	100.0	%	100.0	%	100.0	%

Investments Available for Sale by Rating


Rating(1)	June 30, 2019				December 31, 2018				June 30, 2020				December 31, 2019
($ in thousands)	Fair Value		Percent		Fair Value		Percent		Fair Value		Percent		Fair Value		Percent
Aaa	$	1,638,005	52.8	%	$	1,362,781	49.4	%	$	2,642,359	60.7	%	$	1,817,905	54.2	%
Aa1	127,936		4.1		124,435		4.5		129,451		3.0		109,122		3.3
Aa2	159,631		5.2		196,218		7.1		171,704		3.9		145,282		4.3
Aa3	164,922		5.3		143,315		5.2		235,462		5.4		159,599		4.8
A1	216,738		7.0		222,073		8.0		213,946		4.9		206,643		6.2
A2	174,426		5.6		199,238		7.2		253,507		5.8		183,780		5.5
A3	174,948		5.7		146,300		5.3		211,209		4.9		191,933		5.7
Baa1	170,537		5.5		162,695		5.9		244,669		5.6		232,490		6.9
Baa2	161,799		5.2		140,168		5.1		183,639		4.2		179,664		5.4
Baa3	44,854		1.5		26,805		1.0		37,005		0.9		65,119		1.9
Below Baa3	66,418		2.1		36,038		1.3		29,152		0.7		59,210		1.8
Total Investments Available for Sale	$	3,100,214	100.0	%	$	2,760,066	100.0	%	$	4,352,103	100.0	%	$	3,350,747	100.0	%


(1)	Based on ratings issued by Moody’s, if available. S&P or Fitch Ratings ("Fitch") rating utilized if Moody’s not available.

Investments Available for Sale by Effective Duration


Effective Duration	June 30, 2019				December 31, 2018				June 30, 2020				December 31, 2019
($ in thousands)	Fair Value		Percent		Fair Value		Percent		Fair Value		Percent		Fair Value		Percent
< 1 Year	$	812,953	26.2	%	$	529,545	19.2	%	$	2,140,698	49.2	%	$	1,038,782	31.0	%
1 to < 2 Years	401,313		12.9		285,060		10.3		415,342		9.5		306,148		9.1
2 to < 3 Years	277,580		9.0		251,763		9.1		369,123		8.5		348,708		10.4
3 to < 4 Years	395,083		12.7		278,804		10.1		258,405		5.9		361,147		10.8
4 to < 5 Years	303,485		9.8		429,005		15.6		343,687		7.9		443,382		13.2
5 or more Years	909,800		29.4		985,889		35.7		824,848		19.0		852,580		25.5
Total Investments Available for Sale	$	3,100,214	100.0	%	$	2,760,066	100.0	%	$	4,352,103	100.0	%	$	3,350,747	100.0	%

Top Ten Investments Available for Sale Holdings


		June 30, 2019											June 30, 2020
Rank ($ in thousands)		Security	Fair Value			Amortized Cost		Unrealized Gain (Loss)(1)			Credit Rating(2)		Security	Fair Value			Amortized Cost		Unrealized Gain		Credit Rating(1)
1		U.S. Treasury 0.000% 7/2/2019	$	41,998		$	41,998	$	—		Aaa		Fannie Mae 3.500% 1/1/2058	$	28,982		$	27,508	$	1,474	Aaa
2		U.S. Treasury 2.625% 7/15/2021	36,822			36,146		676			Aaa		Freddie Mac 4.000% 11/1/2048	25,869			24,847		1,022		Aaa
3		U.S. Treasury 5.250% 11/15/2028	29,600			29,150		450			Aaa		U.S. Treasury 0.250% 5/31/2025	25,578			25,560		18		Aaa
4		U.S. Treasury 2.625% 6/30/2023	27,411			26,362		1,049			Aaa		U.S. Treasury 2.625% 6/30/2023	21,194			19,672		1,522		Aaa
5		Fannie Mae 4.500% 5/1/2048	18,573			18,035		538			Aaa		U.S. Treasury 5.250% 11/15/2028	21,100			18,750		2,350		Aaa
6		U.S. Treasury 1.500% 8/15/2026	17,057			17,441		(384		)	Aaa		U.S. Treasury 1.500% 8/15/2026	18,646			17,449		1,197		Aaa
7		Freddie Mac 4.000% 5/15/2050	16,117			16,040		77			Aaa		Ginnie Mae 4.000% 4/20/2049	15,932			15,647		285		Aaa
8		Fannie Mae 4.000% 5/1/2056	13,586			13,061		525			Aaa		Fannie Mae 4.500% 5/1/2048	15,352			14,387		965		Aaa
9		Fannie Mae 3.000% 12/1/2032	12,085			11,726		359			Aaa		U.S. Treasury 2.625% 7/15/2021	15,123			14,742		381		Aaa
10		Fannie Mae 4.500% 11/1/2048	11,967			11,515		452			Aaa		Freddie Mac 4.500% 4/1/2049	14,531			13,865		666		Aaa
Total			$	225,216		$	221,474	$	3,742					$	202,307		$	192,427	$	9,880
Percent of Investments Available for Sale	Percent of Investments Available for Sale		7.3		%							Percent of Investments Available for Sale		4.6		%

(1)

As of June 30, 2019, for securities in unrealized loss positions, management believes decline in fair values are principally associated with the changes in the interest rate environment subsequent to their purchase. Also, see ~~Note 3~~ to our condensed consolidated financial statements, which summarizes the aggregate amount of gross unrealized losses by asset class in which the fair value of investments available for sale has been less than cost for less than 12 months and for 12 months or more.


~~(2)~~	Based on ratings issued by Moody’s, if available. S&P or Fitch rating utilized if Moody’s not available.


Rank		December 31, 2018					December 31, 2019
($ in thousands)		Security	Fair Value				Security	Fair Value
1		U.S. Treasury 2.625% 7/15/2021	$	36,323			Fannie Mae 3.500% 1/1/2058	$	30,112
2		U.S. Treasury 5.250% 11/15/2028	28,213				U.S. Treasury 5.250% 11/15/2028	29,480
3		U.S. Treasury 2.625% 6/30/2023	26,637				Freddie Mac 4.000% 11/1/2048	28,530
4		Fannie Mae 4.500% 5/1/2048	19,419				U.S. Treasury 2.625% 6/30/2023	20,465
5		U.S. Treasury 1.500% 8/15/2026	18,924				U.S. Treasury 1.500% 8/15/2026	17,161
6		Fannie Mae 4.000% 5/1/2056	14,287				Fannie Mae 4.500% 5/1/2048	16,972
7		Fannie Mae 3.000% 12/1/2032	12,797				Freddie Mac 4.500% 4/1/2049	16,585
8		Fannie Mae 4.500% 11/1/2048	12,130				U.S. Treasury 2.625% 7/15/2021	14,978
9		U.S. Treasury 2.000% 1/15/2021	11,382				Freddie Mac 4.000% 5/15/2050	14,700
10		Fannie Mae 1.500% 6/22/2020	11,133				Fannie Mae 4.000% 5/1/2056	13,079
Total			$	191,245				$	202,062
Percent of Investments Available for Sale	Percent of Investments Available for Sale		6.9		%	Percent of Investments Available for Sale		6.0		%

The following tables include municipal debt securities for states that represent more than 10% of the total municipal bond position as of June 30, ~~2019:~~2020:

($ in thousands) Fair Value Amortized
Cost Credit
Rating (1), (2)
Texas

State of Texas $ 8,530
$ 8,214
Baa1
City of Houston 7,313
6,850
Aa3
The Texas A&M University System 6,251
6,031
Aaa
University of Houston System 3,351
3,258
Aa2
Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport 2,359
2,198
A1
City of Austin 2,351
2,168
Aa3
North Texas Municipal Water District 2,044
1,991
Aaa
Harris County Cultural Education 2,002
2,000
A1
City of Dallas 1,837
1,696
Aa3
Tarrant Regional Water District 1,553
1,476
Aaa
Fort Worth TX W&S Revenue 1,547
1,506
Aa1
City of College Station 1,376
1,376
Aa1
City of Garland 1,368
1,362
Aa1
City of San Antonio 1,314
1,203
A1
Bryan Independent School District 1,308
1,296
Aaa
Spring Independent School District 1,230
1,205
Aaa
City of Corpus Christi 1,162
1,089
A1
Harris County Toll Road Authority 1,083
1,055
Aa2
San Jacinto Community College District 875
828
Aa3
County of Fort Bend 848
813
Aa1
Austin-Bergstrom Landhost Enterprises, Inc. 627
597
A3
City of El Paso 582
541
Aa1
$ 50,911
$ 48,753



($ in thousands)	Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Credit Rating (1), (2)
Texas
University of Houston	$	6,722	$	6,353	Aa2
Texas A&M University	6,382		5,909		Aaa
State of Texas	5,882		5,495		Aaa
City of Houston TX Combined Utility System Revenue	5,246		4,645		Aa2
City of Austin TX Electric Utility Revenue	2,362		2,144		Aa3
Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport	2,257		2,175		A2
City of Houston TX	2,241		2,108		Aa3
North Texas Municipal Water District	2,100		1,951		Aaa
North Texas Tollway System	1,891		1,759		A2
City of Dallas TX	1,869		1,672		Aa3
LCRA Transmission Services Corp	1,836		1,814		A2
City of Fort Worth TX Water & Sewer System Revenue	1,563		1,471		Aa1
Tarrant Regional Water District	1,559		1,447		Aaa
City of San Antonio TX Airport System	1,248		1,191		A1
City of Corpus Christi TX Utility System Revenue	1,167		1,076		Aa3
Harris County Toll Road Authority	1,076		1,029		Aa2
Central Texas Turnpike System	1,017		1,012		Baa1
Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County Sales & Use Tax Revenue	932		911		Aaa
County of Fort Bend TX	869		800		Aa1
San Jacinto Community College District	595		545		Aa3
Austin-Bergstrom Landhost Enterprises, Inc.	584		589		A3
Austin Independent School District	311		301		Aaa
	$	49,709	$	46,397

($ in thousands) Fair Value Amortized
Cost Credit
Rating (1), (2)
New York
The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey $ 7,293
$ 6,973
Aa3
City of New York 7,038
6,548
Aa1
New York City Transitional Finance Authority 5,720
5,386
Aa2
Metropolitan Transportation Authority 5,465
5,196
A1
The Dormitory Authority of the State of New York 4,196
3,990
Aa1
New York State Urban Development Corporation 3,106
2,934
Aa1
TSASC, Inc. 2,385
2,213
A2
County of Nassau 2,186
2,034
A2
Public Service Enterprise Group, Inc. 1,880
1,789
A3
Town of Oyster Bay 1,111
1,061
Aa2
Syracuse Industrial Development Agency 337
340
Ba2
$ 40,717
$ 38,464



($ in thousands)	Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Credit Rating (1), (2)
New York
New York City Transitional Finance Authority Future Tax Secured Revenue	$	8,797	$	8,172	Aa1
State of New York Personal Income Tax Revenue	7,411		6,921		Aa1
Metropolitan Transportation Authority	7,378		7,276		A2
City of New York NY	7,225		6,512		Aa1
The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey	5,901		5,565		Aa3
The Research Foundation of State University of New York	3,486		3,165		A1
City of Yonkers NY	2,456		2,304		A2
TSASC, Inc.	2,327		2,189		A2
County of Nassau NY	2,197		2,003		A2
Long Island Power Authority	1,893		1,758		A2
New York State Dormitory Authority	1,803		1,767		Aa3
New York City Transitional Finance Authority Building Aid Revenue	1,594		1,486		Aa2
Town of Oyster Bay NY	1,094		1,042		Aa2
	$	53,562	$	50,160


(1)	Certain of the above securities may include financial guaranty insurance or state enhancements. The above ratings include the effect of these credit enhancements, if applicable.


(2)	Based on ratings issued by Moody’s, if available. S&P or Fitch rating utilized if Moody’s not available.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

Essent Guaranty has entered into fully collateralized reinsurance agreements ("Radnor Re ~~2018-1 Ltd.,~~Transactions") with unaffiliated special purpose insurers domiciled in Bermuda. The Radnor Re ~~2019-1 Ltd. and Radnor Re 2019-2 Ltd.~~special purpose insurers are special purpose variable interest entities that are not consolidated in our condensed consolidated financial statements because we do not have the unilateral power to direct those activities that are significant to their economic performance. As of June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, our estimated off-balance sheet maximum exposure to loss from the Radnor Re entities was ~~$57.4~~$1.1 million, representing the estimated net present value of investment earnings on the assets in the reinsurance trusts. See Note 4 to our condensed consolidated financial statements for additional information.

Critical Accounting Policies

As of the filing date of this report, there were no significant changes in our critical accounting policies from those discussed in our ~~2018~~2019 Form 10-K. See Note 2 to our condensed consolidated financial statements for recently issued accounting standards adopted or under evaluation.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

We own and manage a large investment portfolio of various holdings, types and maturities. Investment income is one of our primary sources of cash flow supporting operations and claim payments. The assets within the investment portfolio are exposed to the same factors that affect overall financial market performance. While our investment portfolio is exposed to factors affecting markets worldwide, it is most sensitive to fluctuations in the drivers of U.S. markets.

We manage market risk via defined investment policy implemented by our treasury function with oversight from our board of directors and our senior management. Important drivers of our market risk exposure monitored and managed by us include but are not limited to:

•

Changes to the level of interest rates. Increasing interest rates may reduce the value of certain fixed-rate bonds held in the investment portfolio. Higher rates may cause variable-rate assets to generate additional income. Decreasing rates will have the reverse impact. Significant changes in interest rates can also affect persistency and claim rates which may in turn require that the investment portfolio be restructured to better align it with future liabilities and claim payments. Such restructuring may cause investments to be liquidated when market conditions are adverse.


•	Changes to the term structure of interest rates. Rising or falling rates typically change by different amounts along the yield curve. These changes may have unforeseen impacts on the value of certain assets.


•	Market volatility/changes in the real or perceived credit quality of investments. Deterioration in the quality of investments, identified through changes to our own or third-party (e.g., rating agency) assessments, will reduce the value and potentially the liquidity of investments.


•	Concentration Risk. If the investment portfolio is highly concentrated in one asset, or in multiple assets whose values are highly correlated, the value of the total portfolio may be greatly affected by the change in value of just one asset or a group of highly correlated assets.


•	Prepayment Risk. Bonds may have call provisions that permit debtors to repay prior to maturity when it is to their advantage. This typically occurs when rates fall below the interest rate of the debt.

Market risk is measured for all investment assets at the individual security level. Market risks that are not fully captured by the quantitative analysis are highlighted. In addition, material market risk changes that occur from the last reporting period to the current are discussed. Changes to how risks are managed will also be identified and described.

At June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, the effective duration of our investments available for sale was ~~3.2~~2.2 years, which means that an instantaneous parallel shift (movement up or down) in the yield curve of 100 basis points would result in a change of ~~3.2%~~2.2% in fair value of our investments available for sale. Excluding short-term investments, our investments available for sale effective duration was ~~3.5~~3.0 years, which means that an instantaneous parallel shift (movement up or down) in the yield curve of 100 basis points would result in a change of ~~3.5%~~3.0% in fair value of our investments available for sale.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our management carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report. Based on this evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

During our most recent fiscal quarter, there has not been any change in our internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

We are not currently subject to any material legal proceedings.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Risk factors that affect our business and financial results are discussed in Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2018.~~2019. There have been no material changes in our risk factors from those previously disclosed in our Annual Report. You should carefully consider the risks described in our Annual Report, which could materially affect our business, financial condition or future results. The risks described in our Annual Report are not the only risks we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, and/or operating results. If any of the risks actually occur, our business, financial condition, and/or results of operations could be negatively affected.

Risks relating to the impact of COVID-19

An outbreak of COVID-19 is currently spreading throughout the world, including in Asia, Europe and the United States. This outbreak is unprecedented in modern history and continues to rapidly evolve and disrupt the global economy and financial markets, including the U.S. housing and mortgage markets. On March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization declared the outbreak to be a pandemic, and on March 13, 2020, U.S. President Donald Trump declared the outbreak to be a national emergency. The rapid spread has resulted in authorities around the world implementing numerous measures to contain the virus, such as travel bans and restrictions, quarantines, shelter-in-place orders and business shutdowns. The pandemic and these containment measures have had, and are expected to continue to have, a substantial negative impact on businesses around the world and on global, regional and national economies.

The emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic and the resulting containment measures have caused economic and financial disruptions that have adversely affected, and are expected to continue to materially adversely affect, our business, results of operations, financial condition and liquidity. The extent to which the pandemic will continue to materially adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition and liquidity will depend on numerous evolving factors and future developments that we are not able to predict, including the duration, spread and severity of the outbreak; the nature, extent and effectiveness of containment measures; the extent and duration of the effect on the economy, unemployment, consumer confidence and consumer and business spending; and how quickly and to what extent normal economic and operating conditions can resume.

Since the outbreak of the pandemic, there have been a number of governmental and GSE efforts to implement programs designed to assist individuals and businesses impacted by the virus. On March 27, 2020, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act, referred to as the CARES Act, was signed into law. The CARES Act provides financial assistance for businesses and individuals and targeted regulatory relief for financial institutions. Among many other things, the CARES Act suspends foreclosures and evictions for at least 60 days from March 18, 2020, on mortgages purchased or securitized by the GSEs. In addition, the CARES Act enacts into law a requirement to provide payment forbearance on such mortgages to borrowers experiencing a hardship during the COVID-19 emergency. Forbearance under the CARES Act allows for a mortgage payment to be suspended for up to 360 days due to hardship caused by COVID-19. The CARES Act also provides for enhanced unemployment benefits and direct aid to individuals, among other things.

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the primary purchasers of mortgages we insure, have adopted relief measures consistent with the CARES Act to assist borrowers impacted by COVID-19. Under forbearance plans announced by the GSEs and implemented by their servicers, eligible homeowners who are adversely impacted by COVID-19 are permitted to temporarily reduce or suspend their mortgage payments for up to 12 months. The GSEs have announced that, at the end of the forbearance plan, the homeowner may not be required to pay back their reduced or suspended mortgage payments in one lump sum, but may be eligible for a number of different options offered by their mortgage servicer, including repayment plans, resuming normal payments or lowering the monthly loan payment through a modification. However, there can be no assurances that homeowners will be able to remain current on their mortgages once the forbearance period ends, and a significant percentage could ultimately default and result in a mortgage insurance claim despite the GSE and other programs.

The COVID-19 pandemic and containment measures have contributed to, among other things:

The risk that policy losses and loss adjustment expenses we ultimately incur as a result of COVID-19 and the related economic impact may be substantially different than the loss reserves established on our financial statements at the end of each period. In accordance with industry practice and statutory accounting rules applicable to mortgage guaranty insurance companies, we establish loss reserves only for loans reported to us in default, including forbearance-related defaults. These reserves are established using estimated claim rates and claim amounts in estimating the ultimate loss, which estimates are subject to significant uncertainty given the unprecedented nature and magnitude of the COVID-19 pandemic. In addition, because our reserving method does not account for the impact of future losses that could occur from loans that are not yet delinquent, our obligation for ultimate losses that we expect to occur under our policies in force at any period end is not reflected in our financial statements, except in the case where a premium deficiency exists.

A deterioration in the ability and willingness of homeowners to continue to make mortgage payments on loans that we insure, which could result in an increase in the amount of insurance regulatory and PMIERs capital we are required to hold for delinquent loans, including forbearance-related delinquencies, as well as an increase in claims ultimately made with respect to such mortgage loans. Mortgage delinquencies are typically affected by a variety of borrower-specific factors, such as job loss, illness, death and divorce, and macroeconomic factors, such as rising unemployment, market deterioration and home price depreciation, many of which are likely exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic.

A potential reduction in the number of new mortgage loans available for us to insure, and consequently, on our future volumes of new insurance written, with the degree of the impact dependent in large part on the extent and duration of the economic contraction.

Adverse impacts on capital, credit and reinsurance market conditions, which may limit our ability to issue ILNs, purchase reinsurance or access traditional financing methods. Such adverse impacts may increase our cost of capital and affect our ability to meet liquidity needs.

An increased strain on our risk management policies generally, including, but not limited to, the effectiveness and accuracy of our models, given the lack of data inputs and comparable precedent.

An increased risk to the value of our investments and other assets, which has the potential to result in impairment charges.

Adverse impacts on our daily business operations and our employees’ ability to perform necessary business functions, including as a result of illness or as a result of restrictions on movement.

Adverse impacts on our costs structure, including the need for increased staffing in certain segments of our business, increased spending on our business continuity efforts, such as technology, and readiness efforts for returning to our offices, which may in turn limit our ability to make investments in other areas.

An increased risk of an information or cyber-security incident, fraud, a failure to maintain the uninterrupted operation of our information systems or a failure in the effectiveness of our anti-money laundering and other compliance programs due to, among other things, an increase in remote work.

The above impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic and containment measures are likely to continue and in some cases, may worsen. The pandemic and containment measures may cause us to modify our strategic plans and business practices, and we may take further actions that we determine are in the best interests of our employees, customers and business partners. As a result of the above risks, COVID-19 could materially and adversely impact our business, results of operations, financial position and liquidity.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

Repurchases of Securities

We did not repurchase any of our common shares during the three months ended June 30, ~~2019.~~2020.

Item 5. Other Information

On August 4, 2020, the Board of Directors of the Company appointed Allan Levine to fill a vacancy on the Board, effective immediately, to serve as a Class II director until his successor is duly elected and qualified at the next annual meeting of shareholders. With Mr. Levine’s appointment, the Company’s Board of Directors consists of nine directors.

Mr. Levine was also appointed to, and as chairman of, the Risk Committee of the Board. Mr. Glanville, the former chairman of the Risk Committee, will remain a member of the Risk Committee.

Mr. Levine, 52, previously served as a member of our Board of Directors from 2008 to 2019. Mr. Levine currently is the chairman and chief executive officer of Global Atlantic Financial Group, a global financial services company, formerly the Goldman Sachs Reinsurance Group which he initially joined in 1997. Prior to the spin-off of Global Atlantic from Goldman Sachs in 2013, Mr. Levine was a partner and managing director of Goldman, Sachs & Co. and global head of the Goldman Sachs Reinsurance Group, and prior to assuming that role, was co-head of the firm's strategy group. Mr. Levine holds a BS from Miami University and an MBA from Columbia Business School.

There are no transactions between Mr. Levine (or any member of his immediate family) and the Company or any of its subsidiaries, and there are no arrangements or understandings between Mr. Levine and any other persons or entities pursuant to which he was appointed as a director of the Company.

Item 6. Exhibits

(a) Exhibits:



Exhibit No.		Description
31.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
101		The following financial information from this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, formatted in Inline XBRL: (i) the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited); (ii) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Unaudited); (iii) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity (Unaudited); (iv) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited); and (v) the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited).

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized, on the date indicated.



		ESSENT GROUP LTD.


Date: August ~~5, 2019~~7, 2020		/s/ MARK A. CASALE
		Mark A. Casale
		President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman (Principal Executive Officer)


Date: August ~~5, 2019~~7, 2020		/s/ LAWRENCE E. MCALEE
		Lawrence E. McAlee
		Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)


Date: August ~~5, 2019~~7, 2020		/s/ DAVID B. WEINSTOCK
		David B. Weinstock
		Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer (Principal Accounting Officer)

4552



(In thousands)
2019 (July 1 through December 31)	$	1,330
2020	2,637
2021	2,657
2022	2,711
2023	2,553
2024 and thereafter	1,963
Total lease payments to be paid	13,851
Less: Future interest expense	(1,454		)
Present value of lease liabilities	$	12,397



Year Ended December 31 (In thousands)
2019	$	2,674
2020	2,628
2021	2,657
2022	2,711
2023	2,553
2024 and thereafter	1,963
Total minimum payments required	$	15,186



	As of June 30, 2018
($ in thousands)	Number of Policies in Default	Percentage of Policies in Default		Amount of Reserves		Percentage of Reserves		Defaulted RIF		Reserves as a Percentage of Defaulted RIF
Missed payments:
Three payments or less	1,543	44	%	$	9,077	20	%	$	84,685	11	%
Four to eleven payments	1,675	47		26,688		58		96,627		28
Twelve or more payments	268	8		8,368		18		14,476		58
Pending claims	33	1		1,640		4		1,946		84
Total case reserves	3,519	100	%	45,773		100	%	$	197,734	23
IBNR				3,433
LAE and other				810
Total reserves for losses and LAE				$	50,016