UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

_____________________________________________________________________

Form 10-Q

_____________________________________________________________________

ý QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Quarterly Period Ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number 001-35007

Swift Transportation Company

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



Delaware		20-5589597
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

2200 South 75th Avenue

Phoenix, AZ 85043

(Address of principal executive offices and zip code)

(602) 269-9700

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

N/A

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ý No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of ~~“large~~"large accelerated filer,~~” “accelerated filer”~~" "accelerated filer" and ~~“smaller~~"smaller reporting ~~company”~~company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No ý

The number of outstanding shares of the registrant’s Class A common stock as of ~~May 1,~~ 7/31/2015 was ~~91,382,832~~91,813,740 and the number of outstanding shares of the registrant’s Class B common stock as of ~~May 1,~~ 7/31/2015 was 50,991,938.

SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY

TABLE OF CONTENTS





PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION	PAGE

Item 1. Financial Statements

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2014	4

Consolidated Income Statements (Unaudited) for the Three and Six Months Ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015 and 2014	5

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Unaudited) for the Three and Six Months Ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015 and 2014	6

Consolidated Statement of Stockholders' Equity (Unaudited) for the ~~Three~~Six Months Ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015	7

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) for the ~~Three~~Six Months Ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015 and 2014	8

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)	10

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	2223

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	4348

Item 4. Controls and Procedures	4348

PART II OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings	4449

Item 1A. Risk Factors	4449

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	4449

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities	4449

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures	4449

Item 5. Other Information	4449

Item 6. Exhibits	4449

Signatures	4550

Table of Contents

SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY

GLOSSARY OF TERMS



The following glossary provides definitions for certain acronyms and terms used in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. These acronyms and terms are specific to our company, commonly used in our industry, or are otherwise frequently used throughout our document.

Term		Definition
Swift/the Company/Management/We/Us/Our		Unless otherwise indicated or the context otherwise requires, these terms represent Swift Transportation Company and its subsidiaries. Swift Transportation Company is the holding company for Swift Transportation Co., LLC (a Delaware limited liability company) and Interstate Equipment Leasing, LLC.
2007 Transactions		In April 2007, Jerry Moyes and his wife contributed their ownership of all of the issued and outstanding shares of IEL to Swift Corporation in exchange for additional Swift Corporation shares. In May 2007, the Moyes Affiliates, contributed their shares of Swift Transportation Co., Inc. common stock to Swift Corporation in exchange for additional Swift Corporation shares. Swift Corporation then completed its acquisition of Swift Transportation Co., Inc. through a merger on May 10, 2007, thereby acquiring the remaining outstanding shares of Swift Transportation Co., Inc. common stock. Upon completion of the 2007 Transactions, Swift Transportation Co., Inc. became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Swift Corporation. At the close of the market on May 10, 2007, the common stock of Swift Transportation Co, Inc. ceased trading on NASDAQ.
2011 RSA		The Company's previous Receivables Sale Agreement, entered into in 2011, with unrelated financial entities
2013 Agreement		The Company's Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, replaced by the 2014 Agreement
2013 RSA		Second Amended and Restated Receivables Sale Agreement, entered into in 2013 by SRCII, with unrelated financial entities, "The Purchasers"
2014 Agreement		The Company's Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement
2015 Agreement		The Company's Fourth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement
AOCI		Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
ASC		Accounting Standards Codification
ASU		Accounting Standards Update
Central		Central Refrigerated Transportation, LLC (formerly Central Refrigerated Transportation, Inc.)
COFC		Container on Flat Car
CSA		Compliance Safety Accountability
Deadhead		Tractor movement without hauling freight (unpaid miles driven)
DOE		United States Department of Energy
EBITDA		Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization
EPS		Earnings Per Share
FASB		Financial Accounting Standards Board
GAAP		United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
IEL		Interstate Equipment Leasing, LLC (formerly Interstate Equipment Leasing, Inc.)
IPO		Initial Public Offering
LIBOR		London InterBank Offered Rate
Moyes Affiliates		Jerry Moyes, The Jerry and Vickie Moyes Family Trust dated December 11, 1987, and various Moyes children’s trusts
NASDAQ		National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotations
NLRB		National Labor Relations Board
OID		Original Issue Discount
Revenue xFSR		Revenue, Excluding Fuel Surcharge Revenue
Revolver		Revolving line of credit
SEC		United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Senior Notes		The Company's previously outstanding senior secured second priority notes
SRCII		Swift Receivables Company II, LLC
The Purchasers		Unrelated financial entities in the 2013 RSA, which was entered into by SRCII
Term Loan A		The Company's first lien term loan A under the 2014 Agreement
Term Loan B		The Company's first lien term loan B under the 2014 Agreement
TOFC		Trailer on Flat Car
~~US-GAAP (or GAAP)~~		~~United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles~~

Table of Contents Glossary of Terms

SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY



PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION



ITEM 1.	FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(UNAUDITED)


	March 31, 2015			December 31, 2014			June 30, 2015			December 31, 2014
	(In thousands, except share data)						(In thousands, except share data)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	68,736		$	105,132		$	53,651		$	105,132
Restricted cash	61,692			45,621			64,309			45,621
Restricted investments, held to maturity, amortized cost	18,286			24,510			18,284			24,510
Accounts receivable, net	452,757			478,999			451,799			478,999
Equipment sales receivable	689			288			—			288
Income tax refund receivable	4,233			18,455			4,399			18,455
Inventories and supplies	18,074			18,992			18,633			18,992
Assets held for sale	3,438			2,907			8,049			2,907
Prepaid taxes, licenses, insurance and other	48,874			51,441			47,137			51,441
Deferred income taxes	35,276			44,861			39,348			44,861
Current portion of notes receivable	8,730			9,202			9,093			9,202
Total current assets	720,785			800,408			714,702			800,408
Property and equipment, at cost:
Revenue and service equipment	2,120,927			2,061,835			2,194,255			2,061,835
Land	122,835			122,835			127,865			122,835
Facilities and improvements	273,567			268,025			263,645			268,025
Furniture and office equipment	68,927			67,740			78,809			67,740
Total property and equipment	2,586,256			2,520,435			2,664,574			2,520,435
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization	1,017,060			978,305			1,049,974			978,305
Net property and equipment	1,569,196			1,542,130			1,614,600			1,542,130
Other assets	37,957			41,855			34,928			41,855
Intangible assets, net	295,729			299,933			291,526			299,933
Goodwill	253,256			253,256			253,256			253,256
Total assets	$	2,876,923		$	2,937,582		$	2,909,012		$	2,937,582

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	162,226		$	160,186		$	123,438		$	160,186
Accrued liabilities	110,947			100,329			114,171			100,329
Current portion of claims accruals	73,429			81,251			74,465			81,251
Current portion of long-term debt	32,581			31,445			30,860			31,445
Current portion of capital lease obligations	45,891			42,902			52,499			42,902
Fair value of interest rate swaps	4,233			6,109			2,213			6,109
Total current liabilities	429,307			422,222			397,646			422,222
Revolving line of credit	—			57,000			—			57,000
Long-term debt, less current portion	867,042			871,615			858,879			871,615
Capital lease obligations, less current portion	153,786			158,104			203,447			158,104
Claims accruals, less current portion	152,732			143,693			148,559			143,693
Deferred income taxes	465,419			480,640			464,206			480,640
Securitization of accounts receivable	294,000			334,000			264,000			334,000
Other liabilities	32			14			181			14
Total liabilities	2,362,318			2,467,288			2,336,918			2,467,288
Contingencies (Note 9)
Commitments and Contingencies (Notes 8 and 9)
Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share; Authorized 10,000,000 shares; none issued	—			—			—			—
Class A common stock, par value $0.01 per share; Authorized 500,000,000 shares; 91,366,626 and 91,103,643 shares issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively	914			911
Class B common stock, par value $0.01 per share; Authorized 250,000,000 shares; 50,991,938 shares issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014	510			510
Class A common stock, par value $0.01 per share; Authorized 500,000,000 shares; 91,743,286 and 91,103,643 shares issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively							917			911
Class B common stock, par value $0.01 per share; Authorized 250,000,000 shares; 50,991,938 shares issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014							510			510
Additional paid-in capital	786,455			781,124			791,776			781,124
Accumulated deficit	(272,177		)	(310,017		)	(221,223		)	(310,017		)
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income	(1,199		)	(2,336		)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)							12			(2,336		)
Noncontrolling interest	102			102			102			102
Total stockholders’ equity	514,605			470,294			572,094			470,294
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	2,876,923		$	2,937,582		$	2,909,012		$	2,937,582

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents Glossary of Terms

SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY

CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENTS

(UNAUDITED)


	Three Months Ended March 31,						Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2015			2014			2015			2014			2015			2014
	(In thousands, except per share data)						(In thousands, except per share data)
Operating revenue:
Revenue, excluding fuel surcharge revenue	$	894,864		$	816,999		$	935,899		$	876,337		$	1,830,763		$	1,693,336
Fuel surcharge revenue	120,280			191,447			123,505			199,561			243,785			391,008
Operating revenue	1,015,144			1,008,446			1,059,404			1,075,898			2,074,548			2,084,344
Operating expenses:
Salaries, wages and employee benefits	261,654			229,366			276,326			238,093			537,980			467,459
Operating supplies and expenses	94,204			80,825			91,147			84,077			185,351			164,902
Fuel	106,907			156,022			116,668			153,677			223,575			309,699
Purchased transportation	288,811			319,169			294,677			340,249			583,488			659,418
Rental expense	61,975			51,719			59,846			56,135			121,821			107,854
Insurance and claims	44,307			42,448			42,206			33,321			86,513			75,769
Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment	56,927			56,175			60,415			54,791			117,342			110,966
Amortization of intangibles	4,204			4,204			4,203			4,203			8,407			8,407
Gain on disposal of property and equipment	(3,932		)	(3,159		)	(10,230		)	(8,312		)	(14,162		)	(11,471		)
Communication and utilities	7,499			7,170			7,399			7,716			14,898			14,886
Operating taxes and licenses	17,588			18,337			18,271			17,926			35,859			36,263
Total operating expenses	940,144			962,276			960,928			981,876			1,901,072			1,944,152
Operating income	75,000			46,170			98,476			94,022			173,476			140,192
Other expenses (income):
Interest expense	10,388			23,225			10,109			21,453			20,497			44,678
Derivative interest expense	2,793			1,653			1,111			1,618			3,904			3,271
Interest income	(587		)	(766		)	(591		)	(692		)	(1,178		)	(1,458		)
Loss on debt extinguishment	—			2,913			—			6,990			—			9,903
Non-cash impairments of non-operating assets	1,480			—			—			—			1,480			—
Legal settlement							6,000			—			6,000			—
Other	(605		)	(864		)	(984		)	(710		)	(1,589		)	(1,574		)
Total other expenses (income), net	13,469			26,161			15,645			28,659			29,114			54,820
Income before income taxes	61,531			20,009			82,831			65,363			144,362			85,372
Income tax expense	23,691			7,704			31,877			25,165			55,568			32,869
Net income	$	37,840		$	12,305		$	50,954		$	40,198		$	88,794		$	52,503
Basic earnings per share	$	0.27		$	0.09		$	0.36		$	0.28		$	0.62		$	0.37
Diluted earnings per share	$	0.26		$	0.09		$	0.35		$	0.28		$	0.62		$	0.37
Shares used in per share calculations:
Basic	142,199			140,981			142,540			141,308			142,371			141,143
Diluted	143,955			143,018			144,212			143,393			144,182			143,265

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents Glossary of Terms

SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(UNAUDITED)


	Three Months Ended March 31,						Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2015			2014			2015			2014			2015			2014
	(In thousands)						(In thousands)
Net income	$	37,840		$	12,305		$	50,954		$	40,198		$	88,794		$	52,503
Accumulated losses on derivatives reclassified to derivative interest expense	1,848			1,314			1,969			1,482			3,817			2,796
Other comprehensive income before income taxes	1,848			1,314			1,969			1,482			3,817			2,796
Income tax effect of items within other comprehensive income	(711		)	(506		)	(758		)	(571		)	(1,469		)	(1,077		)
Other comprehensive income, net of income taxes	1,137			808			1,211			911			2,348			1,719
Total comprehensive income	$	38,977		$	13,113		$	52,165		$	41,109		$	91,142		$	54,222

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents Glossary of Terms

SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

(UNAUDITED)


	Class A Common Stock			Class B Common Stock			Additional Paid-in Capital			Accumulated Deficit				Accumulated Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income				Noncontrolling Interest			Total Stockholders’ Equity			Class A Common Stock					Class B Common Stock				Additional Paid-in Capital		Accumulated Deficit			Accumulated Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income			Noncontrolling Interest			Total Stockholders’ Equity
	Shares	Par Value		Shares	Par Value												Shares						Par Value			Shares		Par Value
	(In thousands, except per share data)																							(In thousands, except per share data)
Balances, December 31, 2014	91,103,643	$	911	50,991,938	$	510			$	781,124			$	(310,017	)		$		(2,336	)	$	102		$	470,294		91,103,643		$	911		50,991,938	$	510	$	781,124		$	(310,017	)	$	(2,336	)	$	102	$	470,294
Common stock issued under stock plans	252,453	3					2,389														2,392			617,254		6							4,730											4,736
Stock-based compensation expense							1,483														1,483												2,883											2,883
Excess tax benefits from exercise of stock options							1,172														1,172
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation																																	2,460											2,460
Shares issued under employee stock purchase plan	10,530	—					287														287			22,389		—							579											579
Net income										37,840											37,840														88,794									88,794
Other comprehensive income, net of income taxes														1,137							1,137																	2,348						2,348
Balances, March 31, 2015	91,366,626	$	914	50,991,938	$	510	$	786,455		$	(272,177	)		$	(1,199	)		$	102		$	514,605
Balances, June 30, 2015																								91,743,286		$	917		50,991,938		$	510	$	791,776	$	(221,223	)	$	12		$	102		$	572,094

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents Glossary of Terms

SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(UNAUDITED)


	Three Months Ended March 31,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2015			2014			2015			2014
	(In thousands)						(In thousands)
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	37,840		$	12,305		$	88,794		$	52,503
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization of property, equipment and intangibles	61,131			60,379			125,749			119,373
Amortization of debt issuance costs, original issue discount, and losses on terminated swaps	2,606			2,515			5,228			5,077
Gain on disposal of property and equipment less write-off of totaled tractors	(3,698		)	(2,958		)	(13,507		)	(10,522		)
Impairments	1,480			—			1,480			—
Deferred income taxes	(6,346		)	(7,942		)	(12,636		)	(25,538		)
Provision for losses on accounts receivable	1,913			792			3,612			1,604
Non-cash loss on debt extinguishment and write-offs of deferred financing costs and original issue discount	—			2,913			—			9,903
Non-cash equity compensation	1,483			1,061			2,883			2,353
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation	(1,172		)	(1,078		)	(2,460		)	(1,835		)
Income effect of mark-to-market adjustment of interest rate swaps	(119		)	(32		)	(325		)	(43		)
Increase (decrease) in cash resulting from changes in:
Accounts receivable	24,329			(37,064		)	23,588			(43,526		)
Inventories and supplies	918			653			359			(2,334		)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	16,789			18,446			18,360			28,128
Other assets	1,450			2,871			4,551			6,556
Accounts payable, accrued and other liabilities	(10,447		)	23,296			2,527			41,784
Net cash provided by operating activities	128,157			76,157			248,203			183,483
Cash flows from investing activities:
(Increase) decrease in restricted cash	(16,071		)	3,821
Increase in restricted cash							(18,688		)	(1,982		)
Proceeds from maturities of investments	14,190			9,500			20,975			19,642
Purchases of investments	(8,016		)	(9,664		)	(14,825		)	(19,755		)
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment	13,370			28,428			46,663			77,088
Capital expenditures	(62,006		)	(60,058		)	(166,697		)	(135,068		)
Payments received on notes receivable	2,065			1,553			3,536			2,226
Expenditures on assets held for sale	(2,313		)	(1,521		)	(11,461		)	(1,991		)
Payments received on assets held for sale	1,815			2,269			4,299			13,603
Payments received on equipment sale receivables	352			469			12			385
Net cash used in investing activities	(56,614		)	(25,203		)	(136,186		)	(45,852		)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Repayment of long-term debt and capital leases	(19,294		)	(46,526		)	(48,777		)	(707,386		)
Proceeds from long-term debt	4,504			—			4,504			450,000
Net repayments on revolving line of credit	(57,000		)	(17,000		)
Net (repayments) borrowings on revolving line of credit							(57,000		)	82,000
Borrowings under accounts receivable securitization	10,000			—			25,000			95,000
Repayment of accounts receivable securitization	(50,000		)	(5,000		)	(95,000		)	(40,000		)
Payment of deferred loan costs							—			(10,541		)
Proceeds from common stock issued	2,679			3,414			5,315			5,811
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation	1,172			1,078			2,460			1,835
Net cash used in financing activities	(107,939		)	(64,034		)	(163,498		)	(123,281		)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents	(36,396		)	(13,080		)
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents							(51,481		)	14,350
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	105,132			59,178			105,132			59,178
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	68,736		$	46,098		$	53,651		$	73,528

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents Glossary of Terms

SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS — CONTINUED

(UNAUDITED)


	Three Months Ended March 31,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2015		2014		2015		2014
	(In thousands)				(In thousands)
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest	$	13,912	$	11,854	$	25,575	$	49,331
Income taxes	1,507		3,463		50,807		22,041
Non-cash investing activities:
Equipment purchase accrual	$	59,814	$	59,867	$	8,991	$	19,916
Notes receivable from sale of assets	1,298		2,762		3,548		4,015
Equipment sales receivables	753		7,376		—		453
Non-cash financing activities:
Capital lease additions	$	9,988	$	—	$	85,821	$	38,043
Accrued deferred loan costs					—		1,433

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents Glossary of Terms

SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(UNAUDITED)

Note 1 — Introduction and Basis of Presentation

Certain acronyms and terms used throughout this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are specific to our company, commonly used in our industry, or are otherwise frequently used throughout our document. Definitions for these acronyms and terms are provided in the "Glossary of Terms," available in the front of this document.

Description of Business

Swift is a transportation solutions provider, headquartered in Phoenix, Arizona. As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015, the Company's fleet of revenue equipment included ~~19,535~~20,667 tractors (comprised of ~~14,680~~15,727 company tractors and ~~4,855~~4,940 owner-operator tractors), ~~61,780~~63,142 trailers and 9,150 intermodal containers. The Company’s four reportable segments are Truckload, Dedicated, Central Refrigerated and Intermodal.

Seasonality

In the truckload industry, results of operations generally show a seasonal pattern. As customers ramp up for the holiday season at year-end, the late third and fourth quarters have historically been the Company's strongest volume quarters. As customers reduce shipments after the winter holiday season, the first quarter has historically been a lower volume quarter than the other three quarters. In recent years, the macro consumer buying patterns combined with shippers’ supply chain management, which historically contributed to the fourth quarter ~~“peak”~~"peak" season, continued to evolve. As a result, the Company's fourth quarter 2014, 2013 and 2012 volumes were more evenly disbursed throughout the quarter rather than peaking early in the quarter. In the eastern and mid-western United States, and to a lesser extent in the western United States, during the winter season the Company's equipment utilization typically declines and operating expenses generally increase, with fuel efficiency declining because of engine idling and severe weather sometimes creating higher accident frequency, increased claims, and more equipment repairs. Revenue may also be affected by holidays as a result of curtailed operations or vacation shutdowns, because the Company's revenue is directly related to available working days of shippers. From time to time, the Company also suffers short-term impacts from severe weather and similar events, such as tornadoes, hurricanes, blizzards, ice storms, floods, fires, earthquakes, and explosions that could add volatility to, or harm, the Company's results of operations.

Basis of Presentation

The consolidated financial statements and footnotes included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and footnotes included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Swift Transportation Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. In management's opinion, these consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with principles generally accepted in the United States and include all adjustments necessary for the fair presentation of the periods presented.

Changes in Presentation

Beginning in 2015, the Company separately presents excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation within "Net cash provided by operating activities" in the consolidated statements of cash flows. The prior period presentation has been retrospectively adjusted to reclassify the amount out of "Accounts payable, accrued and other liabilities" and into the new line item "Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation." The change in presentation has no net impact on ~~“Net~~"Net cash provided by operating activities."

Also beginning in 2015, the Company presents gross amounts of its investment in securities activities as "Proceeds from maturities of investments" and "Purchases of investments" in the consolidated statements of cash flows. The prior period presentation has been retrospectively adjusted to accommodate this gross presentation. The change in presentation has no net impact on "Net cash used in investing activities."

Beginning in 2015, the Company has disaggregated "Operating revenue" in the consolidated income statements into the line items "Revenue, excluding fuel surcharge revenue" and "Fuel surcharge revenue." The change in presentation has no net impact on "Operating revenue."

Note 2 — Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In July 2015, FASB issued ASU 2015-11, Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory, which amends ASC Topic 330, Inventory. The amendments in this ASU simplify subsequent measurement of inventory for all inventory measurement methods, except for last-in-first-out and retail inventory methods. Current guidance requires entities to measure inventory at the lower of cost or market. However, market could be the replacement cost, net realizable value, or net realizable value less an approximately normal profit margin. The new guidance requires entities to measure inventory at the lower of cost and net realizable value, instead of the

Table of Contents Glossary of Terms

SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) — CONTINUED

previously issued guidance of lower of cost or market. FASB defines net realizable value as estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal and transportation. For public business entities, the amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The amendments should be applied prospectively. Although early adoption is permitted, the Company expects to adopt this guidance at the beginning of 2017. However, due to the nature of the Company's inventory balances (spare parts, tires, fuel and supplies), inventory is predominantly stated at cost, which is consistently below net realizable value. As such, the amendments in this ASU are not expected to have a material impact on the Company's financial position or results of operations upon adoption.

In April 2015, FASB issued ASU 2015-03, Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs, which amends ASC Subtopic 835-30, Interest — Imputation of Interest. The amendments in this ASU simplify the presentation of debt issuance costs and align the presentation with debt discounts. Entities will be required to present debt issuance costs as a direct deduction from the face amount of the related note, rather than as a deferred charge. Upon adoption, the amended guidance will affect Swift's classification of debt issuance costs, which are currently classified in "Other assets" in the consolidated balance sheets. The reclassification of debt

~~Table of ContentsGlossary of Terms~~

~~SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY~~

~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) — CONTINUED~~

issuance costs will effectively decrease "Other assets" and correspondingly decrease the respective long-term debt balances. The amendments in this ASU require retrospective application, with related disclosures for a change in accounting principle. Upon adoption, the Company will comply with these disclosure requirements by providing the nature and reason for the change, the transition method, a description of the adjusted prior period information and the effect of the change on the financial statement line items. For public business entities, the amendments in this ASU will be effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, and the interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted; however, the Company expects to adopt this guidance at the beginning of 2016.

In February 2015, FASB issued ASU 2015-02, Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis, which amends ASC Topic 810, Consolidation, by changing the analysis that reporting entities are required to perform to determine whether certain types of legal entities should be consolidated. The amendments in this ASU focus on limited partnerships and similar legal entities (such as limited liability companies); however, all legal entities are subject to reevaluation under the revised consolidation model. The revised consolidation model modifies the evaluation of whether limited partnerships and similar legal entities are variable interest entities or voting interest entities, and eliminates the presumption that a general partner should consolidate a limited partnership. It also affects the consolidation analysis of reporting entities that are involved with variable interest entities, especially those that have fee arrangements and related-party relationships. The amendments in the ASU also affect certain investment funds. For public business entities, the amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, and the interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. Entities may use a retrospective approach, or a modified retrospective approach by recording a cumulative-effect adjustment to equity as of the beginning of the year of adoption. The Company is currently evaluating the accounting, transition and disclosure requirements of the standard and cannot currently estimate the financial statement impact of adoption.

Note 3 — Restricted Investments

The following table presents the cost or amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and temporary losses, and estimated fair value of the Company’s restricted investments as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 (in thousands):


	March 31, 2015									June 30, 2015
			Gross Unrealized									Gross Unrealized
	Cost or Amortized Cost		Gains		Temporary Losses			Estimated Fair Value		Cost or Amortized Cost		Gains		Temporary Losses			Estimated Fair Value
United States corporate securities	$	16,861	$	6	$	(3	)	$	16,864	$	16,659	$	2	$	(6	)	$	16,655
Negotiable certificates of deposit	1,425		1		—			1,426		1,625		—		—			1,625
Total restricted investments	$	18,286	$	7	$	(3	)	$	18,290	$	18,284	$	2	$	(6	)	$	18,280

	December 31, 2014									December 31, 2014
			Gross Unrealized									Gross Unrealized
	Cost or Amortized Cost		Gains		Temporary Losses			Estimated Fair Value		Cost or Amortized Cost		Gains		Temporary Losses			Estimated Fair Value
United States corporate securities	$	20,892	$	2	$	(10	)	$	20,884	$	20,892	$	2	$	(10	)	$	20,884
Foreign corporate securities	1,503		—		—			1,503		1,503		—		—			1,503
Negotiable certificates of deposit	2,115		—		—			2,115		2,115		—		—			2,115
Total restricted investments	$	24,510	$	2	$	(10	)	$	24,502	$	24,510	$	2	$	(10	)	$	24,502

Table of Contents Glossary of Terms

SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) — CONTINUED

As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015, the contractual maturities of the restricted investments were one year or less. There were 11 securities and 24 securities that were in an unrealized loss position for less than twelve months as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively. The Company did not recognize any impairment losses for the three or six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015 or 2014.

~~Table of ContentsGlossary of Terms~~

~~SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY~~

~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) — CONTINUED~~

Note 4 — Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

There were no goodwill impairments recorded during the three or six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015 or 2014. Intangible assets as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 were as follows (in thousands):


	March 31, 2015			December 31, 2014			June 30, 2015			December 31, 2014
Customer Relationships:
Gross carrying value	$	275,324		$	275,324		$	275,324		$	275,324
Accumulated amortization	(160,632		)	(156,428		)	(164,835		)	(156,428		)
Trade Name:
Gross carrying value	181,037			181,037			181,037			181,037
Intangible assets, net	$	295,729		$	299,933		$	291,526		$	299,933

The following table presents amortization of intangibles for the three and six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015 and 2014, related to intangible assets recognized in conjunction with the 2007 going private transaction and the previous intangible assets existing prior to the 2007 going private transaction (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended March 31,				Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2015		2014		2015		2014		2015		2014
Amortization of intangible assets related to 2007 going private transaction	$	3,912	$	3,912	$	3,912	$	3,912	$	7,824	$	7,824
Amortization related to intangible assets existing prior to the 2007 going private transaction	292		292		291		291		583		583
Amortization of intangibles	$	4,204	$	4,204	$	4,203	$	4,203	$	8,407	$	8,407

Note 5 — Accounts Receivable Securitization

In June 2013, SRCII entered into the 2013 RSA with the Purchasers to replace the Company's prior 2011 RSA, and to sell, on a revolving basis, undivided interests in the Company’s accounts receivable. Pursuant to the 2013 RSA, the Company’s receivable originator subsidiaries sell all of their eligible accounts receivable to SRCII, which in turn sells a variable percentage ownership interest in its accounts receivable to the Purchasers. On September 26, 2014, the Company exercised an accordion option, increasing the maximum borrowing capacity on the 2013 RSA from $325.0 million to $375.0 million. The Company entered into an amendment to the 2013 RSA, effective March 31, 2015, to clarify when the Company’s consent is required in conjunction with a Purchaser’s sale or assignment of any portion of its purchased interest in the receivables and to amend certain of the performance ratios to provide increased flexibility to the Company in managing its receivables.

The facility qualifies for treatment as a secured borrowing under ASC Topic 860, Transfers and Servicing. As such, outstanding amounts are classified as liabilities on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets in "Securitization of accounts receivable."

As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, interest ~~accrues~~accrued on the aggregate principal balance at a rate of 0.8% ~~and 0.8%, respectively.~~. Program fees and unused commitment fees are recorded in interest expense in the Company's consolidated income statements. The Company incurred program fees of ~~$1.0~~$0.9 million and $0.8 million, during the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The Company incurred program fees of $1.9 million and $1.6 million, during the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

The 2013 RSA is subject to customary fees and contains various customary affirmative and negative covenants, representations and warranties, and default and termination provisions. Collections on the underlying receivables by the Company are held for the benefit of SRCII and the Purchasers in the facility and are unavailable to satisfy claims of the Company and its subsidiaries.

Table of Contents Glossary of Terms

SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) — CONTINUED

Note 6 — Debt and Financing

Other than the Company’s accounts receivable securitization, as discussed in Note 5, and its outstanding capital lease obligations as discussed in Note 7, the Company's long-term debt consisted of the following (in thousands):


	March 31, 2015			December 31, 2014			June 30, 2015			December 31, 2014
2014 Agreement: Term loan A, due June 2019	$	494,375		$	500,000		$	488,000		$	500,000
2014 Agreement: Term Loan B, net of $885 and $920 OID as of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively	395,115			396,080
2014 Agreement: Term Loan B, net of $849 and $920 OID as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively							394,151			396,080
Other	10,133			6,980			7,588			6,980
Long-term debt	899,623			903,060			889,739			903,060
Less: current portion of long-term debt	(32,581		)	(31,445		)	(30,860		)	(31,445		)
Long-term debt, less current portion	$	867,042		$	871,615		$	858,879		$	871,615
Revolving line of credit ⁽¹⁾	$	—		$	57,000
Long-term debt, including revolving line of credit	$	899,623		$	960,060
Revolver ⁽¹⁾							$	—		$	57,000
Long-term debt, including Revolver							$	889,739		$	960,060

____________


(1)	The Company had outstanding letters of credit, primarily related to workers' compensation and self-insurance liabilities, of $100.3 million at ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015 and ~~$100.3 million at~~ December 31, 2014, under the ~~revolving line of credit.~~Revolver.

Credit Agreement

The Company entered into the 2014 Agreement on June 9, 2014, which included a delayed-draw first lien Term Loan A tranche, a first lien Term Loan B tranche, and a revolving credit line. The following table presents the key terms of the 2014 Agreement (dollars in thousands):


Description	Term Loan A	Term Loan B	Revolver ⁽²⁾	Term Loan A⁽⁴⁾	Term Loan B ⁽⁴⁾	Revolver ⁽²⁾⁽⁴⁾
Maximum borrowing capacity(3)	$500,000	$400,000	$450,000	$500,000	$400,000	$450,000
Final maturity date	June 9, 2019	June 9, 2021	June 9, 2019	June 9, 2019	June 9, 2021	June 9, 2019
Interest rate base	LIBOR	LIBOR	LIBOR	LIBOR	LIBOR	LIBOR
LIBOR floor	—%	0.75%	—%	—%	0.75%	—%
Interest rate minimum margin⁽¹⁾	1.50%	2.75%	1.50%	1.50%	2.75%	1.50%
Interest rate maximum margin⁽¹⁾	2.25%	3.00%	2.25%	2.25%	3.00%	2.25%
Minimum principal payment - amount ⁽³⁾	$5,625	$1,000	$—
Minimum principal payment - frequency	Quarterly	Quarterly	Once
Minimum principal payment - commencement date ⁽³⁾	March 31, 2015	June 30, 2014	June 30, 2019
Minimum principal payment — amount				$5,625	$1,000	$—
Minimum principal payment — frequency				Quarterly	Quarterly	Once
Minimum principal payment — commencement date				March 31, 2015	June 30, 2014	June 30, 2019

____________

(1)

Interest rate margins for the Term Loan A, Term Loan B and Revolver are based on the Company's consolidated leverage ratio. As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015, interest accrues at ~~1.93%~~1.94% and 3.75% on the Term Loan A and Term Loan B, respectively. As of December 31, 2014, interest accrued at 2.16% and 3.75% on the Term Loan A and Term Loan B, respectively. Prior to January 1, 2015, the minimum and maximum interest rate margins on the Term Loan B were both 3.00%.

(2)

The commitment fee for the unused portion of the Revolver is also based on the Company's consolidated leverage ratio, and ranges from 0.25% to 0.35%. As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015, commitment fees on the unused portion of the Revolver accrue at 0.25% and outstanding letter of credit fees accrue at 1.75%. As of December 31, 2014, commitment fees on the unused portion of the Revolver accrued at 0.30% and outstanding letter of credit fees accrued at 2.00%.


(3)	~~Commencing in March 2017,~~As of June 30, 2015, the ~~minimum quarterly principal payment amount on~~maximum borrowing capacities for the Term Loan A ~~is $11.3 million.~~and Term Loan B were reduced to the face amounts outstanding of $488.0 million and $395.0 million, respectively.


(4)	On July 27, 2015, the Company entered into the 2015 Agreement, which replaced the 2014 Agreement. See Note 15 for further details.

The Revolver and Term Loan A of the 2014 Agreement contain certain financial covenants with respect to a maximum leverage ratio and a minimum consolidated interest coverage ratio. The 2014 Agreement provides flexibility regarding the use of proceeds from asset sales, payment of dividends, stock buybacks, and equipment financing. In addition to the financial covenants, the 2014 Agreement includes customary events of default, including a change in control default and certain affirmative and negative covenants,

Table of Contents Glossary of Terms

SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) — CONTINUED

including, but not limited to, restrictions, subject to certain exceptions, on incremental indebtedness, asset sales, certain restricted payments (including dividends), certain incremental investments or advances, transactions with affiliates, engaging in additional business activities, and prepayments of certain other indebtedness.

~~Table of ContentsGlossary of Terms~~

~~SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY~~

~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) — CONTINUED~~

Borrowings under the credit facility are secured by substantially all of the assets of the Company and are guaranteed by Swift Transportation Company, IEL, Central Refrigerated Transportation, LLC and its subsidiaries, Swift Transportation Co., LLC and its domestic subsidiaries other than its captive insurance subsidiaries, driver academy subsidiary, and its bankruptcy-remote special purpose subsidiary.

Deferred Loan Costs and Loss on Debt Extinguishment

Deferred loan costs, reported in "Other assets" in the Company's consolidated balance sheets, were ~~$9.7~~$9.2 million and $10.4 million, as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively.

~~For the three months ended March 31, 2015, the~~The Company did not incur any ~~loss~~losses on debt ~~extinguishment. For~~extinguishment during the three or six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, the Company incurred ~~a $2.9~~$7.0 million and $9.9 million in losses on debt extinguishment. During the six months ended June 30, 2014, $5.2 million of the loss on debt extinguishment related to the replacement of the 2013 Agreement with the 2014 Agreement and $4.7 million related to the Company's repurchase of its Senior Notes.

Note 7 — Leases

The Company finances a portion of its revenue equipment under capital and operating leases and certain terminals under operating leases.

Capital - — The Company’s capital leases are typically structured with balloon payments at the end of the lease term equal to the residual value the Company is contracted to receive from certain equipment manufacturers upon sale or trade back to the manufacturers. If the Company does not receive proceeds of the contracted residual value from the manufacturer, the Company is still obligated to make the balloon payment at the end of the lease term. Certain leases contain renewal or fixed price purchase options. The present value of obligations under capital leases is included under "Current portion of capital lease obligations" and "Capital lease obligations, less current portion" in the consolidated balance sheets. As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015, the leases were collateralized by revenue equipment with a cost of ~~$266.7~~$329.2 million and accumulated amortization of ~~$71.6~~$75.5 million. As of December 31, 2014, the leases were collateralized by revenue equipment with a cost of $270.6 million and accumulated amortization of $68.0 million. Amortization of the equipment under capital leases is included in "Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment" in the Company’s consolidated income statements.

Operating -— Rent expense related to operating leases was ~~$62.0 million and $51.7~~$59.8 million for the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015 and ~~2014, respectively.~~$56.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2014. Rent expense related to operating leases was $121.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and $107.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014.

Note 8 — Purchase Commitments

As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015, the Company had commitments outstanding to acquire revenue equipment for the remainder of 2015 ~~for~~of approximately ~~$705.5~~$437.2 million ($~~569.4~~341.4 million of which were tractor commitments) and in 2016 to 2017 for approximately $380.5 million (all of which were tractor commitments). The Company generally has the option to cancel tractor purchase orders with 60 to 90 ~~days~~days' notice prior to the scheduled production, although the notice period has lapsed for ~~approximately 31.3%~~36.1% of the tractor commitments outstanding as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015. These purchases are expected to be financed by the combination of operating leases, capital leases, debt, proceeds from sales of existing equipment and cash flows from operations.

As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015, the Company had outstanding purchase commitments of approximately ~~$8.6~~$4.9 million for facilities and non-revenue equipment. Factors such as costs and opportunities for future terminal expansions may change the amount of such expenditures.

Note 9 — Contingencies and Legal Proceedings

The Company is involved in certain claims and pending litigation primarily arising in the normal course of business. The majority of these claims relate to workers' compensation, auto collision and liability, and physical damage and cargo damage. The Company expenses legal fees as incurred and accrues for the uninsured portion of contingent losses from these and other pending claims when it is both probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. Based on the

Table of Contents Glossary of Terms

SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) — CONTINUED

knowledge of the facts and, in certain cases, advice of outside counsel, management believes the resolution of claims and pending litigation, taking into account existing reserves, will not have a material adverse effect on the Company. Moreover, the results of complex legal proceedings are difficult to predict and the Company’s view of these matters may change in the future as the litigation and events related thereto unfold.

For certain cases described below, management is unable to provide a meaningful estimate of the possible loss or range of loss because, among other reasons, ~~(i)~~(1) the proceedings are in various stages; ~~(ii)~~(2) damages have not been sought; ~~(iii)~~(3) damages are unsupported and/or exaggerated; ~~(iv)~~(4) there is uncertainty as to the outcome of pending appeals; and/or ~~(v)~~(5) there are significant

~~Table of ContentsGlossary of Terms~~

~~SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY~~

~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) — CONTINUED~~

factual issues to be resolved. For these cases, however, management does not believe, based on currently available information, that the outcomes of these proceedings will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, though the outcomes could be material to our operating results for any particular period, depending, in part, upon the operating results for such period.

Arizona Owner-operator Class Action Litigation

On January 30, 2004, a class action lawsuit was filed by Leonel Garza on behalf of himself and all ~~similarly situated~~similarly-situated persons against Swift Transportation: Garza v. Swift Transportation Co., Inc., Case No. CV7-472 ("the Garza Complaint"). The putative class originally involved certain owner-operators who contracted with the Company under a 2001 Contractor Agreement that was in place for one year. The putative class is alleging that the Company should have reimbursed owner-operators for actual miles driven rather than the contracted and industry standard remuneration based upon dispatched miles. The trial court denied plaintiff’s petition for class ~~certification, the~~certification. The plaintiff appealed and on August 6, 2008, the Arizona Court of Appeals issued an unpublished Memorandum Decision reversing the trial court’s denial of class certification and remanding the case back to the trial court. On November 14, 2008, the Company filed a petition for review to the Arizona Supreme Court regarding the issue of class certification as a consequence of the denial of the Motion for Reconsideration by the Court of Appeals. On March 17, 2009, the Arizona Supreme Court granted the Company’s petition for review, and on July 31, 2009, the Arizona Supreme Court vacated the decision of the Court of Appeals, opining that the Court of Appeals lacked automatic appellate jurisdiction to reverse the trial court’s original denial of class certification and remanded the matter back to the trial court for further evaluation and determination. Thereafter, the plaintiff renewed the motion for class certification and expanded it to include all persons who were employed by Swift as employee drivers or who contracted with Swift as owner-operators on or after January 30, 1998, in each case who were compensated by reference to miles driven. On November 4, 2010, the Maricopa County trial court entered an order certifying a class of owner-operators and expanding the class to include employees. Upon certification, the Company filed a motion to compel arbitration, as well as filing numerous motions in the trial court urging dismissal on several other grounds including, but not limited to the lack of an employee as a class representative, and because the named owner-operator class representative only contracted with the Company for a three-month period under a one-year contract that no longer exists. In addition to these trial court motions, the Company also filed a petition for special action with the Arizona Court of Appeals, arguing that the trial court erred in certifying the class because the trial court relied upon the Court of Appeals ruling that was previously overturned by the Arizona Supreme Court. On April 7, 2011, the Arizona Court of Appeals declined jurisdiction to hear this petition for special action and the Company filed a petition for review to the Arizona Supreme Court. On August 31, 2011, the Arizona Supreme Court declined to review the decision of the Arizona Court of Appeals. In April 2012, the trial court issued the following rulings with respect to certain motions filed by Swift: (1) denied Swift’s motion to compel arbitration; (2) denied Swift’s request to decertify the class; (3) granted Swift’s motion that there is no breach of contract; and (4) granted Swift’s motion to limit class size based on statute of limitations. On November 13, 2014, the court denied plaintiff's motion to add new class representatives for the employee class and therefore the employee class remains without a plaintiff class representative. On March 18, 2015, the court denied Swift's two motions for summary judgment 1)(1) to dismiss any claims related to the employee class since there is no class representative; and 2)(2) to dismiss plaintiff's claim of breach of a duty of good faith and fair dealing. ~~Swift filed a~~On July 14, 2015, the court granted Swift's motion to decertify the entire ~~class which remains pending before the court. The matter is scheduled for trial in October 2015.~~class. The Company intends to ~~continue to pursue all available appellate relief supported~~defend any appeal pursued by the record, which the Company believes demonstrates that the class is improperly certified and, further, that the claims raised have no merit. The Company retains all of its defenses against liability and damages. The final disposition of this case and the impact of such final disposition cannot be determined at this time.plaintiff.

Ninth Circuit Owner-operator Misclassification Class Action Litigation

On December 22, 2009, a class action lawsuit was filed against Swift Transportation and IEL: Virginia VanDusen, John Doe 1 and Joseph Sheer,, individually and on behalf of all other ~~similarly situated~~similarly-situated persons v. Swift Transportation Co., Inc., Interstate Equipment Leasing, Inc., Jerry Moyes, and Chad Killebrew, Case No. 9-CIV-10376 filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York ("the Sheer Complaint"). The putative class involves owner-operators alleging that Swift Transportation misclassified owner-operators as independent contractors in violation of the federal Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA"), and various New York and California state laws and that such owner-operators should be considered employees. The lawsuit also raises certain related issues with respect to the lease agreements that certain owner-operators have entered into with IEL. At present, in addition to the named plaintiffs, approximately ~~200~~450 other current or former owner-operators have joined this lawsuit. Upon Swift’s motion, the matter ~~has been~~was transferred from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York to the United States District Court in Arizona. On May 10, 2010, the plaintiffs filed a motion to conditionally certify an FLSA collective action and authorize notice to the potential class members. On September 23, 2010, plaintiffs filed a motion for a preliminary injunction seeking to enjoin Swift and IEL from collecting payments from plaintiffs who are in default under their lease agreements and related relief. On September 30, 2010, the ~~District Court~~district court granted Swift’s motion to compel arbitration and ordered that the class action be stayed, pending the outcome of arbitration. The ~~District Court~~district court further denied plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction and motion for conditional class certification. ~~The District Court also denied plaintiff’s request to arbitrate the matter as a class.~~

The plaintiff filed a petition for a writ of mandamus to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals asking that the District Court’s September 30, 2010 order be vacated. On July 27, 2011, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals denied the plaintiff’s petition for writ of mandamus and thereafter the District Court denied plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration and certified its September 30, 2010 order. The plaintiffs

Table of Contents Glossary of Terms

SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) — CONTINUED

The district court also denied plaintiff’s request to arbitrate the matter as a class.

The plaintiff filed a petition for a writ of mandamus to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals asking that the district court’s September 30, 2010 order be vacated. On July 27, 2011, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals denied the plaintiff’s petition for writ of mandamus and thereafter the district court denied plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration and certified its September 30, 2010 order. The plaintiffs filed an interlocutory appeal to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals to overturn the ~~District Court’s~~district court’s September 30, 2010 order to compel arbitration, alleging that the agreement to arbitrate is exempt from arbitration under Section 1 of the Federal Arbitration Act ~~(“FAA”~~("FAA") because the class of plaintiffs allegedly consists of employees exempt from arbitration agreements. On November 6, 2013, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed and remanded, stating its prior published decision, ~~“expressly~~"expressly held that a district court must determine whether an agreement for arbitration is exempt from arbitration under Section 1 of the FAA as a threshold matter." As a consequence of this determination by the ~~ninth~~Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals being different from a decision of the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals on a similar issue, on February 4, 2014, the Company filed a petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Supreme Court to address whether the district court or arbitrator should determine whether the contract is an employment contract exempt from Section 1 of the Federal Arbitration Act. On June 16, 2014, the United States Supreme Court denied the Company’s petition for writ of certiorari. The matter remains pending in the ~~District Court~~district court and is currently in discovery. The Company has filed a writ of mandamus and appeal from the district court's order that effectively denies the Company's motion to compel arbitration. The writ and appeal were accepted by the Ninth Circuit and are proceeding simultaneously with discovery in the district court. The Company intends to vigorously defend against any proceedings. The final disposition of this case and the impact of such final disposition cannot be determined at this time.

California Wage, Meal and Rest Employee Class Actions

On March 22, 2010, a class action lawsuit was filed by John Burnell, individually and on behalf of all other ~~similarly situated~~similarly-situated persons against Swift Transportation: John Burnell and all others ~~similarly situated~~similarly-situated v. Swift Transportation Co., Inc., Case No. CIVDS 1004377 filed in the Superior Court of the State of California, for the County of San Bernardino ("the Burnell Complaint"). On September 3, 2010, upon motion by Swift, the matter was removed to the United States District Court for the Central District of California, Case No. EDCV10-809-VAP. The putative class includes drivers who worked for Swift during the four years preceding the date of filing alleging that Swift failed to pay the California minimum wage, failed to provide proper meal and rest periods and failed to timely pay wages upon separation from employment. The Burnell Complaint was subject to a stay of proceedings pending determination of similar issues in a case unrelated to Swift, Brinker v. Hohnbaum, which was then pending before the California Supreme Court. A ruling was entered in the Brinker matter and in August 2012 the stay in the Burnell Complaint was lifted. On April 9, 2013, the Company filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings, requesting dismissal of plaintiff's claims related to alleged meal and rest break violations under the California Labor Code alleging that such claims are preempted by the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act. On May 29, 2013, the ~~U.S.~~United States District Court for the Central District of California granted the Company's motion for judgment on the pleadings and dismissed plaintiff's claims that are based on alleged violations of meal and rest periods set forth in the California Labor Code. Plaintiff appealed to the Ninth Circuit Court. Based on the Circuit Court's holding in a different case, it remanded the plaintiff's meal and rest break claims to the district court. The district court has ~~appealed.~~not yet addressed the merits of those claims. Minimum wage claims (specifically that ~~pay per-mile~~pay-per-mile fails to compensate drivers for non-driving-related services), timeliness of such pay and the issue of class certification remain pending.

On April 5, 2012, the Company was served with an additional class action complaint, alleging facts similar to those as set forth in the Burnell ~~Complaint. This class action is~~Complaint: James R. Rudsell, on behalf of himself and all others ~~similarly situated~~similarly-situated v. Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC and Swift Transportation Company, Case No. CIVDS 1200255, in the Superior Court of California for the County of San Bernardino ~~("the Rudsell~~(the "Rudsell Complaint"). The Rudsell Complaint ~~has been~~was stayed, pending a resolution in the Burnell Complaint.

The issue of class certification must first be resolved before the court will address the merits of the case, and the Company retains all of its defenses against liability and damages pending a determination of class certification. The Company intends to vigorously defend certification of the class in both matters, as well as the merits of these matters, should the classes be certified. The final disposition of both cases and the impact of such final dispositions of these cases cannot be determined at this time. There have been no significant developments to these cases since December 31, 2014.

~~California Wage and Hour Class Action~~

On September 25, 2014, a class action lawsuit was filed by Lawrence Peck on behalf of himself and all other ~~similarly situated~~similarly-situated persons against Swift Transportation: Peck v. Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC in the Superior Court of California, County of Riverside ("the Peck Complaint"). The putative class includes current and former non-exempt employee truck drivers who performed services in California within the four-year statutory period, alleging that Swift failed to pay for all hours worked (specifically that pay-per-mile fails to compensate drivers for non-driving related services), failed to pay overtime, failed to properly reimburse work-related expenses, failed to timely pay wages and failed to provide accurate wage statements.

Peck is currently stayed, pending a resolution in the Burnell and Rudsell cases, based on the similarity of the Peck claims to the claims in those earlier filed cases.

On February 27, 2015, Sadashiv Mares filed a complaint in the California Superior Court for the County of Alameda alleging five Causes of Action arising under California state law on behalf of himself and a putative class against Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC (the "Mares Complaint"). On June 19, 2015, Swift filed a demurrer because plaintiff’s complaint failed to state a claim under Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 430.10(e) and was uncertain, ambiguous and unintelligible under Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 430.10(f). On July 13, 2015, the case was removed to federal court under the Class Action Fairness Act. The case remains at the pleading stage. Management believes the case involves similar claims to those alleged in the Burnell, Rudsell and Peck Complaints.

On or about April 15, 2015, a complaint was filed in the Superior Court of the State of California in and for the County of San Bernardino: Rafael McKinsty et al. v. Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC, et al., Case No. CIVDS 1505599 (the "McKinsty Complaint"). The McKinsty Complaint, a purported class action, alleges violation of California rest break laws and is similar to the

Table of Contents Glossary of Terms

SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) — CONTINUED

Burnell, Rudsell, Peck and Mares Complaints. The case was removed to federal court and was related to the Burnell, Rudsell and Peck actions.

The issue of class certification must first be resolved before the court will address the merits of these cases, and the Company retains all of its defenses against liability and damages, pending a determination of class certification. The Company intends to vigorously defend certification of the class in all of these matters, as well as the merits of these matters, should the classes be certified. The final disposition of these cases and the impact of such final dispositions of these cases cannot be determined at this time.

National Customer Service Misclassification Class Action Litigation

On April 15, 2014, a collective and class action was filed by a former Swift Customer Service Representative level four ("CSR IV"), Lorraine Flores, individually and on behalf of herself and all similarly-situated persons against Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, Case No. CV 14-2900-AB(Ex) (the "Flores Complaint"). The operative complaint alleges failure to pay overtime under the FLSA, as well as California state law claims including failure to pay timely final wages, failure to provide meal and rest periods, failure to pay overtime, and violation of the unfair competition law (four-year statute of limitations).

On October 3, 2014, the California District Court compelled, to individual arbitration, CSR IVs who signed Arbitration Agreements. On October 30, 2014, Flores’ overtime claim under the FLSA was conditionally certified and notice was issued to all CSR IVs. Thirty-three CSR IVs who signed valid Arbitration Agreements filed individual arbitrations with the American Arbitration Association ("AAA"). Approximately thirty-two CSR IVs who did not sign Arbitration Agreements opted into the collective action.

The parties have agreed to mediate this matter. On July 1, 2015, an Order was entered which stayed the matter so that the parties may participate in mediation. The derivative arbitrations are also stayed while the parties pursue mediation. Swift intends to mediate this case within the next two months. The final disposition of this case and the impact of such final disposition of this case cannot be determined at this time.

Washington Overtime Class Action

On September 9, 2011, a class action lawsuit was filed by Troy Slack and several other drivers on behalf of themselves, and all ~~similarly situated~~similarly-situated persons, against Swift Transportation: Troy Slack, et al v. Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC and Swift Transportation Corporation in the State Court of Washington, Pierce County ("the Slack Complaint"). The Slack Complaint was removed to federal court on October 12, 2011, case number 11-2-114380. The putative class includes all current and former Washington ~~State-based~~state-based employee drivers during the three-year statutory period prior to the filing of the lawsuit, and through tothe present,

~~Table of ContentsGlossary of Terms~~

~~SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY~~

~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) — CONTINUED~~

and alleges that they were not paid minimum wage and overtime in accordance with Washington ~~State~~state law and that they suffered unlawful deductions from wages. On November 23, 2013, the court entered an order on plaintiffs' motion to certify the class. The court only certified the class as it pertains to "dedicated" drivers and did not certify any other class, including any class related to ~~over the road drivers (“OTR Drivers”).~~over-the-road drivers. The parties dispute the definition of "dedicated" as used by the court and a class notice has not yet been issued. The matter is now anticipated to move into discovery. The Company retains all of its defenses against liability and damages. The Company intends to vigorously defend the merits of these claims and to challenge certification. The final disposition of this case and the impact of such final disposition of this case cannot be determined at this time.

Utah Collective and Individual Arbitration

On June 1, 2012, ~~a collective and class action complaint was filed by~~ Gabriel Cilluffo, Kevin Shire and Bryan Ratterree ~~individually~~filed a putative class and ~~on behalf of themselves and all similarly situated persons~~collective action lawsuit against Central Refrigerated Services, Inc., Central Leasing, Inc., Jon Isaacson, and Jerry ~~Moyes: Gabriel Cilluffo, Kevin Shire and Bryan Ratterree individually and on behalf themselves and all similarly situated persons v. Central Refrigerated Services, Inc.~~Moyes (collectively referred to herein as "Central"), ~~Central Leasing, Inc., Jon Isaacson, and Jerry Moyes~~Case No. ED CV 12-00886 in the ~~United~~Unites States District Court for the Central District of ~~California, Case No. ED CV 12-00886 ("~~California. Through this action, the ~~Cilluffo Complaint"). The putative class involves owner-operators alleging~~plaintiffs alleged that Central misclassified ~~owner-operators~~owner-operator drivers as independent contractors ~~in violation~~and were therefore liable to these drivers for minimum wages and other employee benefits under the FLSA. The complaint also alleged a federal forced labor claim under 18 U.S.C. § 1589 and 1595.

Pursuant to the plaintiffs' owner-operator agreements, the district court issued an Order compelling arbitration and directed that the plaintiffs' causes of action under the FLSA ~~and that such owner-operators~~ should ~~be considered employees. The lawsuit also raises a claim of forced labor and state law contractual claims. On September 24, 2012, the California District Court ordered that the FLSA claim~~ proceed to collective arbitration, ~~under the Utah Uniform Arbitration Act (“UUAA”) and not the FAA. The September 24, 2012 order directed the arbitrator to determine the validity of proceeding~~while their forced labor claims would proceed as aseparate individual arbitrations. A collective arbitration ~~under~~was subsequently initiated with the ~~UUAA, and then if~~AAA. Notice of the arbitrator determines that such collective action is permitted, then the arbitrator is to consider the plaintiff’s FLSA claim. On November 8, 2012, the California District Court entered a clarification order clarifying that the plaintiff’s FLSA claim was to proceed to collective arbitration ~~under~~was sent to more than 3,000 owner-operators who worked for Central Refrigerated Services, Inc. and leased a vehicle from Central Leasing, Inc. on or after June 1, 2009. The parties are currently conducting discovery. No trial date has been set by the UUAA, but the plaintiff’s forced labor claim and state law contractual claims were to proceed as individual arbitrations for those plaintiffs seeking to pursue those specific claims. Central filed a motion for reconsideration and a motion for interlocutory appeal of the California District Court’s orders, both of which were denied and the claims are proceeding to collective and individual arbitration as originally ordered. On December 9, 2013, the arbitrator determined that the issue of misclassification as it relatesarbitrator.

In addition to the ~~FLSA will proceed as~~collective arbitration that is pending before the AAA, the three named plaintiffs, along with more than 310 other owner-operators, have initiated a ~~collective arbitration; however,~~series of individual, bilateral proceedings against Central with the plaintiffs forced labor claim and state law claims of contractual misrepresentation and breach of contract must proceed on an individual arbitration basis and not as a class. The matter is currently in discovery.AAA.

Central intends to vigorously defend ~~collective arbitration in the Cilluffo Complaint, as well as~~against the merits of plaintiffs' claims in both the ~~FLSA claim~~collective and ~~any~~ individual arbitration ~~matters that are filed, and proceed on the forced labor and state contract law claims.~~proceedings. The final disposition of this case and the impact ~~of such final disposition of this case~~ cannot be determined at this time.

Table of Contents Glossary of Terms

SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) — CONTINUED

Legal Settlement

In June 2015, the Company settled a lawsuit relating to a contractual dispute with an ancillary fuel system equipment supplier. As a result of this settlement, the Company incurred a $6.0 million expense. The expense was fully accrued as of June 30, 2015 and is included under "Legal Settlement" in the consolidated income statements. The settlement was fully paid subsequent to June 30, 2015.

Environmental Notice

On April 17, 2009, the Company received a notice from the Lower Willamette Group ("LWG"), advising that there was a total of 250 potentially responsible parties ("PRPs"), with respect to alleged environmental contamination of the Lower Willamette River in Portland, Oregon, designated as the Portland Harbor Superfund site ("the Site"), and that as a previous landowner at the Site, the Company was asked to join a group of 60 PRPs and proportionately contribute to ~~(i)~~(1) reimbursement of funds expended by LWG to investigate environmental contamination at the Site and ~~(ii)~~(2) remediation costs of the same, rather than be exposed to potential litigation. Although the Company does not believe it contributed any contaminants to the Site, the Company was at one time the owner of property at the Site and the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act imposes a standard of strict liability on property owners with respect to environmental claims. Notwithstanding this standard of strict liability, management believes the Company's potential proportionate exposure to be minimal and not material. No formal complaint has been filed in this matter. The Company’s pollution liability insurer ~~has been~~was notified of this potential claim. Management does not believe the outcome of this matter is likely to have a material adverse effect on Swift. However, the final disposition of this matter and the impact of such final disposition cannot be determined at this time. There have been no significant developments pertaining to this matter since December 31, 2014.

Other Environmental

The Company's tractors and trailers are involved in motor vehicle accidents, and experience damage, mechanical failures and cargo issues as an incidental part of its ~~normal~~ ordinary course of operations. From time to time, these matters result in the discharge of diesel fuel, motor oil or other hazardous materials into the environment. Depending on local regulations and who is determined to be at fault, the Company is sometimes responsible for the clean-up costs associated with these discharges. As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015, the Company's estimate for its total legal liability for all such clean-up and remediation costs was approximately ~~$0.4~~$0.6 million in the aggregate for all current and prior year claims.

Note 10 — Derivative Financial Instruments

Refer to Note 11 for fair value measurements of the Company's interest rate swaps. The following table presents pre-tax losses (gains) from changes in fair value of the Company's interest rate swaps, included in earnings (in thousands):



	Three Months Ended June 30,					Six Months Ended June 30,
	2015			2014		2015		2014
Loss reclassified from AOCI into net income from cash flow hedges (effective portion)	$	1,969		$	1,482	$	3,817	$	2,796
(Gain) loss recognized in income from de-designated derivative contracts	(858		)	136		87		475
Derivative interest expense	$	1,111		$	1,618	$	3,904	$	3,271

As of June 30, 2015, $0.2 million of deferred losses on derivatives in AOCI are expected to be reclassified to earnings within the next twelve months. There were no losses recognized in AOCI from the effective portion of cash flow hedges during the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 or 2014.

Losses (benefits) on cash flow hedging, reclassified out of AOCI into the consolidated income statements were as follows (in thousands):

1718

Table of Contents Glossary of Terms

SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) — CONTINUED

~~Note 10 — Derivative Financial Instruments~~

~~The following table presents pre-tax losses from changes in fair value of the Company's interest rate swaps, included in earnings (in thousands):~~

Three Months Ended March 31,
2015 2014
Loss reclassified from AOCI into net income from cash flow hedges (effective portion) $ 1,848
$ 1,314
Loss recognized in income from de-designated derivative contracts 945
339
Derivative interest expense $ 2,793
$ 1,653

As of March 31, 2015, $2.1 million of deferred losses on derivatives in AOCI are expected to be reclassified to earnings within the next 12 months. There were no losses recognized in AOCI from the effective portion of cash flow hedges during the three months ended March 31, 2015 or 2014.

~~Losses on cash flow hedging, reclassified out of AOCI into the consolidated income statements were as follows (in thousands):~~


		Three Months Ended March 31,							Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	Reclassified to:	2015			2014			Reclassified to:	2015			2014			2015			2014
Interest rate swaps	Derivative interest expense	$	1,848		$	1,314		Derivative interest expense	$	1,969		$	1,482		$	3,817		$	2,796
Income tax (benefit) expense	Income tax expense	(711		)	(506		)	Income tax expense	(758		)	(571		)	(1,469		)	(1,077		)
	Net income	$	1,137		$	808		Net income	$	1,211		$	911		$	2,348		$	1,719

Activities related to AOCI net of tax, are presented in the consolidated statement of stockholders' equity, and primarily pertain to derivative financial instruments. The tax effects are presented in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income.

Activities related to foreign currency transactions were immaterial for the three and six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015 and 2014.

Note 11 — Fair Value Measurement

The following table presents the carrying amounts and estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 (in thousands):


	March 31, 2015				December 31, 2014				June 30, 2015				December 31, 2014
	Carrying Value		Estimated Fair Value		Carrying Value		Estimated Fair Value		Carrying Value		Estimated Fair Value		Carrying Value		Estimated Fair Value
Financial Assets:
Restricted investments	$	18,286	$	18,290	$	24,510	$	24,502	$	18,284	$	18,280	$	24,510	$	24,502
Financial Liabilities:
2014 Agreement: Term Loan A, due June 2019	494,375		494,375		500,000		500,000		488,000		488,000		500,000		500,000
2014 Agreement: Term Loan B, net of $885 and $920 OID as of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively	395,115		395,858		396,080		390,436
2014 Agreement: Term Loan B, net of $849 and $920 OID as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively									394,151		394,809		396,080		390,436
Securitization of accounts receivable	294,000		294,000		334,000		334,000		264,000		264,000		334,000		334,000

The carrying amounts shown in the table (other than restricted investments and securitization of accounts receivable) are included in the consolidated balance sheets in "Current portion of long-term debt" and "Long-term debt, less current portion."

~~Table of ContentsGlossary of Terms~~

~~SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY~~

~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) — CONTINUED~~

Recurring Fair Value Measurements

As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, interest rate swaps were the only major category of liabilities included in the Company's consolidated balance sheets at estimated fair value that were measured on a recurring basis.

The following table depicts the level in the fair value hierarchy of the inputs used to estimate fair value of these instruments (in thousands):


			Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using								Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
	Estimated Fair Value		Level 1 Inputs		Level 2 Inputs		Level 3 Inputs		Estimated Fair Value		Level 1 Inputs		Level 2 Inputs		Level 3 Inputs
As of March 31, 2015
As of June 30, 2015
Interest rate swaps	$	4,233	$	—	$	4,233	$	—	$	2,213	$	—	$	2,213	$	—
As of December 31, 2014
Interest rate swaps	$	6,109	$	—	$	6,109	$	—	6,109		—		6,109		—

As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, there were no assets included in the Company's consolidated balance sheets at estimated fair value that were measured on a recurring basis.

Table of Contents Glossary of Terms

SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) — CONTINUED

Nonrecurring Fair Value Measurements

The following table depicts the level in the fair value hierarchy of the inputs used to estimate fair value of assets measured on a nonrecurring basis (in thousands):


			Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using									Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
	Estimated Fair Value		Level 1 Inputs	Level 2 Inputs	Level 3 Inputs		Total Gains (Losses)			Estimated Fair Value		Level 1 Inputs		Level 2 Inputs		Level 3 Inputs		Total Gains (Losses)
As of March 31, 2015
As of June 30, 2015
Note receivable	$	—			$	—	$	(1,480	)	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	(1,480	)
As of December 31, 2014
Other assets	$	—			$	—	$	(2,308	)	—		—		—		—		(2,308		)

In September 2013, the Company agreed to advance up to $2.3 million, pursuant to an unsecured promissory note, to an independent fleet contractor that transported freight on Swift's behalf. In March 2015, management became aware that the independent contractor violated various covenants outlined in the unsecured promissory note, which created an event of default that made the principal and accrued interest immediately due and payable. As a result of this event of default, as well as an overall decline in the independent contractor's financial condition, management re-evaluated the fair value of the unsecured promissory note. As of March 31, 2015, management determined that the remaining balance due from the independent contractor to the Company was not collectible, which resulted in a $1.5 million pre-tax adjustment that was recorded in "Non-cash impairments of non-operating assets" in the Company's consolidated income statements.

Fair value of assets measured on a nonrecurring basis as of December 31, 2014, represent certain operations software that was replaced, and for which the carrying value was determined to be fully impaired during the three months ended September 30, 2014.

Note 12 — Earnings per Share

The following table reconciles basic weighted average shares outstanding to diluted weighted average shares outstanding (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended March 31,		Three Months Ended June 30,		Six Months Ended June 30,
	2015	2014	2015	2014	2015	2014
Basic weighted average common shares outstanding	142,199	140,981	142,540	141,308	142,371	141,143
Dilutive effect of stock options	1,756	2,037	1,672	2,085	1,811	2,122
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding	143,955	143,018	144,212	143,393	144,182	143,265
Anti-dilutive shares excluded from the dilutive-effect calculation ⁽¹⁾			195	—	—	—

Option exercise prices were greater than the average market price of the common shares during the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014. As such, there were no anti-dilutive shares to be excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share.____________


(1)	Shares were excluded from the dilutive-effect calculation because the outstanding options' exercise prices were greater than the average market price of the Company's common shares during the period.

~~Table of ContentsGlossary of Terms~~

~~SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY~~

~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) — CONTINUED~~

Note 13 — Income Taxes

The effective tax rate for the three and six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015 and ~~March 31,~~ 2014 was 38.5%.

The Company recognizes potential accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as a component of income tax expense. Accrued interest and penalties as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015 were approximately $1.3 million. To the extent interest and penalties are not assessed with respect to uncertain tax positions, amounts accrued ~~will be~~are reduced and reflected as a reduction of the overall income tax provision. The Company does not anticipate a decrease of unrecognized tax benefits during the next twelve months.

Certain of the Company’s subsidiaries are currently under examination by ~~the Internal Revenue Service and~~ various state jurisdictions for tax years ranging from 2010 through 2013. At the completion of these examinations, management does not expect any adjustments that would have a material impact on the Company’s effective tax rate. Tax years 2010 through 2013 remain subject to examination.

Table of Contents Glossary of Terms

SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) — CONTINUED

Note 14 — Segments and Geography

Segment Information

The Company’s four reportable operating segments are Truckload, Dedicated, Central Refrigerated and Intermodal.

Truckload — The Truckload segment consists of one-way movements over irregular routes throughout the United States, Mexico, and Canada. This service utilizes both company and owner-operator tractors with dry van, flatbed, and other specialized trailing equipment.

Dedicated — Through the Dedicated segment, the Company devotes use of equipment to specific customers and offers tailored solutions under long-term contracts. This ~~dedicated~~ segment utilizes refrigerated, dry van, flatbed and other specialized trailing equipment.

Central Refrigerated —This segment represents the core operations of Central and primarily consists of shipments for customers that require temperature-controlled trailers. These shipments include one-way movements over irregular routes, as well as dedicated truck operations.

Intermodal — The Intermodal segment includes revenue generated by moving freight over the rail in the Company's containers and other trailing equipment, combined with revenue for drayage to transport loads between the railheads and customer locations.

Non-reportable Segment — The other non-reportable segment includes the Company's logistics and freight brokerage services, as well as support services provided by its subsidiaries to customers and owner-operators, including repair and maintenance shop services, equipment leasing, and insurance. Intangible amortization related to the 2007 ~~going-private transaction~~Transactions is also included in this other non-reportable segment.

~~Other~~ Intersegment ~~Transactions~~Eliminations — Certain operating segments provide transportation and related services for other affiliates outside their reportable segment. Revenues for such services are based on negotiated rates, which we believe approximate fair value, and are reflected as revenues of the billing segment. These rates are adjusted from time to time, based on market conditions. Such intersegment revenues and expenses are eliminated in our consolidated results.

Set forth in the tables below is certain financial information with respect to the Company’s reportable segments (in thousands):


	Operating Revenue						Operating Revenue
	Three Months Ended March 31,						Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2015			2014			2015			2014			2015			2014
Truckload	$	538,341		$	553,057		$	555,715		$	575,481		$	1,094,056		$	1,128,538
Dedicated	217,775			193,653			234,213			223,098			451,988			416,751
Central Refrigerated	95,568			106,763			97,688			106,911			193,256			213,674
Intermodal	90,354			91,313			98,507			100,911			188,861			192,224
Subtotal	942,038			944,786			986,123			1,006,401			1,928,161			1,951,187
Non-reportable segment	91,622			75,666			93,869			83,491			185,491			159,157
Intersegment eliminations	(18,516		)	(12,006		)	(20,588		)	(13,994		)	(39,104		)	(26,000		)
Consolidated operating revenue	$	1,015,144		$	1,008,446		$	1,059,404		$	1,075,898		$	2,074,548		$	2,084,344



	Operating Income (Loss)
	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2015			2014			2015		2014
Truckload	$	67,944		$	69,596		$	124,798	$	101,503
Dedicated	22,967			21,112			37,312		32,642
Central Refrigerated	6,117			3,662			10,916		6,082
Intermodal	1,601			(495		)	358		(1,421		)
Subtotal	98,629			93,875			173,384		138,806
Non-reportable segment	(153		)	147			92		1,386
Consolidated operating income	$	98,476		$	94,022		$	173,476	$	140,192

2021

Table of Contents Glossary of Terms

SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) — CONTINUED

Operating Income (Loss)
Three Months Ended March 31,
2015 2014
Truckload $ 56,854
$ 31,907
Dedicated 14,345
11,530
Central Refrigerated 4,799
2,420
Intermodal (1,243 ) (926 )
Subtotal 74,755
44,931
Non-reportable segment 245
1,239
Consolidated operating income $ 75,000
$ 46,170


	Depreciation and Amortization Expense				Depreciation and Amortization of Property and Equipment
	Three Months Ended March 31,				Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2015		2014		2015		2014		2015		2014
Truckload	$	28,610	$	30,245	$	29,925	$	28,316	$	58,534	$	58,561
Dedicated	14,273		12,405		15,620		13,670		29,893		26,075
Central Refrigerated	3,294		3,106		3,370		2,914		6,664		6,020
Intermodal	3,252		2,368		3,444		2,583		6,696		4,951
Subtotal	49,429		48,124		52,359		47,483		101,787		95,607
Non-reportable segment	7,498		8,051		8,056		7,308		15,555		15,359
Consolidated depreciation and amortization expense	$	56,927	$	56,175
Consolidated depreciation and amortization of property and equipment					$	60,415	$	54,791	$	117,342	$	110,966

Geographical Information

In aggregate, operating revenue from the Company's foreign operations was less than 5.0% of consolidated operating revenue for the three and six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015 and 2014. Additionally, long-lived assets on the balance sheets of the Company's foreign subsidiaries were less than 5.0% of consolidated ~~Total~~total assets as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014.

Note 15 — Subsequent Event

On July 27, 2015, the Company entered into the 2015 Agreement, which replaced the 2014 Agreement, including the $450.0 million Revolver, $500.0 million Term Loan A ($488.0 million outstanding as of June 30, 2015) and $400.0 million Term Loan B ($394.2 million carrying value as of June 30, 2015). The 2015 Agreement includes a $600.0 million revolving credit facility ("new Revolver") and a $680.0 million first lien term loan A tranche ("new Term Loan A"). Upon closing, the proceeds from the new Term Loan A, a $200.0 million draw on the new Revolver and $3.0 million cash on hand were used to pay off the then-outstanding balances of the Term Loan A and Term Loan B under the 2014 Agreement, as well as certain transactional fees associated with the 2015 Agreement. This resulted in outstanding balances on the new Term Loan A and new Revolver of $680.0 million and $200.0 million, respectively. The pricing of the new Revolver and new Term Loan A is unchanged from the 2014 Agreement at 1.75% over LIBOR, subject to a leverage-based grid, and is lower than the pricing of the Term Loan B. The new Revolver and new Term Loan A mature in July 2020 and are subject to the same financial covenants and substantially the same terms as those contained in the 2014 Agreement.

2122

Table of Contents Glossary of Terms

SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY



ITEM 2.	MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
(UNAUDITED)

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-looking Statements

This report contains statements that may constitute forward-looking statements, which are based on information currently available, usually defined by words such as "anticipates," "believes," "estimates," "plans," "projects," "expects," "hopes," "intends," "will," "could," "should," "may," or similar expressions which speak only as of the date the statement was made. Such forward-looking statements are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such statements include, but are not limited to, statements concerning:

trends, management's beliefs, and expectations relating to our operations, Revenue xFSR, expenses, other revenue, pricing, our effective tax rate, profitability and related metrics;

impact and planned timing of adopting recently issued accounting pronouncements on future periods;

our expectation of increasing driver wages and hiring expenses;

the outcome and impact of pending claims, litigation and actions in respect thereof;

our intentions concerning the potential use of derivative financial instruments to hedge fuel price increases;

the timing and amount of future acquisitions of revenue equipment and other capital expenditures, as well as the use and availability of cash, cash flows from operations, leases and debt to finance such acquisitions;

that we may seek additional borrowings, lease financing or equity capital;

the potential impact of inflation, seasonality and severe weather conditions on our results of operations;

~~the impact in 2015 of the discontinuation of a large dedicated account within the Central Refrigerated segment;~~ and

our ability to finance our cash needs from operations for the next twelve months.

Such forward-looking statements are inherently uncertain, and are based upon the current beliefs, assumptions and expectations of Company management and current market conditions, which are subject to significant risks and uncertainties, as set forth in the Risk Factors section of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014. As to the Company's business and financial performance, the following factors, among others, could cause actual results to materially differ from those in forward-looking ~~statements.~~statements:

economic conditions, including future recessionary economic cycles and downturns in customers’ business cycles, particularly in market segments and industries in which we have a significant concentration of customers;

increasing competition from trucking, rail, intermodal, and brokerage competitors;

our ability to execute or integrate any future acquisitions successfully;

increases in driver compensation to the extent not offset by increases in freight rates and difficulties in driver recruitment and retention;

our ability to attract and maintain relationships with owner-operators;

our ability to retain or replace key personnel;

our dependence on third parties for intermodal and brokerage business;

potential failure in computer or communications systems;

seasonal factors such as severe weather conditions that increase operating costs;

the regulatory environment in which we operate, including existing regulations and changes in existing regulations, or violations by us of existing or future regulations;

the possible re-classification of our owner-operators as employees;

changes in rules or legislation by the NLRB or Congress and/or union organizing efforts;

our CSA safety rating;

government regulation with respect to our captive insurance companies;

uncertainties and risks associated with our operations in Mexico;

a significant reduction in, or termination of, our trucking services by a key customer;

our significant ongoing capital requirements;

the amount and velocity of changes in fuel prices and our ability to recover fuel prices through our fuel surcharge program;

volatility in the price or availability of fuel;

increases in new equipment prices or replacement costs;

our level of indebtedness and our ability to service our outstanding indebtedness, including compliance with our indebtedness covenants, and the impact such indebtedness may have on the way we operate our business;

2223

Table of Contents Glossary of Terms

SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

(UNAUDITED) — CONTINUED

restrictions contained in our debt agreements;

adverse impacts of insuring risk through our captive insurance companies, including our need to provide restricted cash and similar collateral for anticipated losses;

potential volatility or decrease in the amount of earnings as a result of our claims exposure through our captive insurance companies;

the potential impact of the significant number of shares of our common stock that is outstanding;

goodwill impairment;

our intention to not pay dividends;

conflicts of interest or potential litigation that may arise from other businesses owned by Jerry Moyes, including pledges of Swift stock and guarantees related to other businesses by Jerry Moyes;

the significant amount of our stock and related control over the Company by Jerry Moyes;

related-party transactions between the Company and Jerry Moyes; and

that our acquisition of Central may be challenged by our stockholders.

Important factors, in addition to those listed above and in our filings with the SEC, could impact us financially. As a result of these and other factors, actual results may differ from those set forth in the forward-looking statements, and the prices of the Company's securities may dramatically fluctuate. The Company makes no commitment, and disclaims any duty, to update or revise any forward-looking statements to reflect future events, new information or changes in these expectations.

Reference to Glossary of Terms

Reference to Annual Report on Form 10-K

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and footnotes included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, as well as the consolidated financial statements and footnotes included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014.

2324

Table of Contents Glossary of Terms

SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED) — CONTINUED

Executive Summary

Company Overview — Swift is a multi-faceted transportation services company, operating the largest fleet of truckload equipment in North America from over 40 terminals near key freight centers and traffic lanes. We principally operate in short- to medium-haul traffic lanes around our terminals and dedicated customer locations. We concentrate on this length of haul because the majority of domestic truckload freight (as measured by revenue) moves in these lanes and our extensive terminal network affords us marketing, equipment control, supply chain, customer service, and driver retention advantages in local markets. Since our average length of haul is relatively short, it helps reduce competition from railroads and trucking companies that lack a regional presence.

As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015, our fleet of revenue equipment included ~~19,535~~20,667 tractors (comprised of ~~14,680~~15,727 company tractors and ~~4,855~~4,940 owner-operator tractors), ~~61,780~~63,142 trailers and 9,150 intermodal containers. Our four reportable segments are Truckload, Dedicated, Central Refrigerated and Intermodal. Our extensive suite of service offerings (which includes line-haul services, dedicated customer contracts, temperature-controlled units, intermodal freight solutions, cross-border United States/Mexico and United States/Canada freight, flatbed hauling, freight brokerage and logistics, and others) provides our customers with the opportunity to "one-stop-shop" for their truckload transportation needs.

Revenue — We primarily generate revenue by transporting freight for our customers, generally at a predetermined rate per mile. We supplement this revenue by charging for fuel surcharges, stop-off pay, loading and unloading activities, tractor and trailer detention, and other ancillary services. The main factors that affect our revenue from transporting freight are the rate per mile we receive from our customers and loaded miles. The main factors that affect fuel surcharge revenue are the price of diesel fuel and the number of loaded miles. Fuel surcharges are billed on a lagging basis, meaning that we typically bill customers in the current week based on a previous week's applicable index. Therefore, in times of increasing fuel prices, we do not recover as much as we are currently paying for fuel. In periods of declining prices, the opposite is true.

Revenue in our non-reportable segment is generated by our non-asset-based freight brokerage and logistics management service, tractor leasing revenue from our financing subsidiaries, premium revenue from our captive insurance companies, and revenue from third parties serviced by our repair and maintenance shops. Main factors affecting revenue in our non-reportable segment are demand for brokerage and logistics services and number of equipment leases to our owner-operators by our financing subsidiaries.

Expenses — Our most significant expenses vary with miles traveled and include fuel, driver-related expenses (such as wages and benefits) and services purchased from owner-operators and other transportation providers (such as railroads, drayage providers, and other trucking companies). Maintenance and tire expenses and cost of insurance and claims generally vary with the miles we travel, but also have a controllable component based on safety improvements, fleet age, efficiency, and other factors. Our primary fixed costs are depreciation and lease expense for revenue equipment and terminals, interest expense, and non-driver compensation.

Changes in deadhead miles percentage generally have the largest proportionate effect on our profitability because we still bear all of the expenses for each deadhead mile, but do not earn any revenue to offset those expenses. Changes in rate per mile have the next largest proportionate effect on profitability because incremental improvements in rate per mile are not offset by any additional expenses. Changes in loaded miles generally have a smaller effect on profitability because variable expenses fluctuate with changes in miles. However, changes in mileage are affected by driver satisfaction and network efficiency, which indirectly affect expenses.

Financial Overview



	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2015			2014			2015			2014
	(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Operating revenue	$	1,059,404		$	1,075,898		$	2,074,548		$	2,084,344
Revenue xFSR	$	935,899		$	876,337		$	1,830,763		$	1,693,336
Net income	$	50,954		$	40,198		$	88,794		$	52,503
Diluted earnings per share	$	0.35		$	0.28		$	0.62		$	0.37
Operating Ratio	90.7		%	91.3		%	91.6		%	93.3		%
Non-GAAP financial data:
Adjusted Operating Ratio⁽¹⁾	89.1		%	88.8		%	90.1		%	91.3		%
Adjusted EBITDA ⁽¹⁾	$	159,478		$	155,018		$	297,697		$	263,492
Adjusted EPS⁽¹⁾	$	0.37		$	0.33		$	0.65		$	0.44

Three Months Ended March 31,
2015 2014
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Operating revenue $ 1,015,144
$ 1,008,446
Revenue xFSR $ 894,864
$ 816,999
Net income $ 37,840
$ 12,305
Diluted earnings per common share $ 0.26
$ 0.09
Operating Ratio 92.6 % 95.4 %
Non-GAAP financial data:
Adjusted Operating Ratio⁽¹⁾
91.2 % 93.9 %
Adjusted EBITDA ⁽¹⁾
$ 138,219
$ 108,474
Adjusted EPS⁽¹⁾
$ 0.29
$ 0.12

~~Table of ContentsGlossary of Terms~~

~~SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY~~

~~MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED) — CONTINUED~~

____________


(1)	Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted Operating Ratio and Adjusted EPS are non-GAAP financial measures. These non-GAAP financial measures should not be considered alternatives, or superior, to GAAP financial measures. However, management believes

Table of Contents Glossary of Terms

SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED) — CONTINUED

that presentation of these non-GAAP financial measures provides useful information to investors regarding the Company's results of operations. Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted Operating Ratio and Adjusted EPS are reconciled to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures under "Non-GAAP Financial Measures," below.

Factors Affecting Comparability ~~Between~~between Periods

Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015, Compared to the Three Months Ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2014

Net income for the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015 was ~~$37.8~~$51.0 million, as compared to ~~$12.3~~$40.2 million for the ~~corresponding~~same period in 2014. The following factors affected comparability between the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015 and the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2014:

$~~12.8~~11.3 million decrease in interest expense, driven by the call of the Senior Notes in November 2014, lower debt balances and more favorable interest rates and terms from the replacement of the 2013 Agreement with the 2014 Agreement.

$6.0 million non-operating expense for a lawsuit that was settled in June 2015 and paid in July 2015.

$7.0 million loss on debt extinguishment resulting from the replacement of the 2013 Agreement with the 2014 Agreement, as well as repurchases of our Senior Notes during the three months ended June 30, 2014.

Increases in company driver wages and owner-operator contracted pay rates in August 2014 and May 2015.

Results of Operations for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2015, Compared to the Six Months Ended June 30, 2014

Net income for the six months ended June 30, 2015 was $88.8 million, as compared to $52.5 million for the same period in 2014. The following factors affected comparability between the six months ended June 30, 2015 and the six months ended June 30, 2014:

$24.2 million decrease in interest expense, driven by the call of the Senior Notes in November 2014, lower debt balances and more favorable interest rates and terms from the replacement of the 2013 Agreement with the 2014 Agreement.

$6.0 million non-operating expense for a lawsuit that was settled in June 2015 and paid in July 2015.

$1.5 million pre-tax impairment of a non-operating note receivable, during the three months ended March 31, 2015. The note was due to the Company from an independent fleet contractor, transporting freight on behalf of Swift.

$~~2.9~~9.9 million in loss on debt extinguishment resulting from the ~~repurchase~~replacement of the 2013 Agreement with the 2014 Agreement, as well as repurchases of our Senior Notes during the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2014.

Increases in company driver wages and owner-operator contracted pay rates in August 2014 and May 2015.

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

The terms "Adjusted EBITDA," "Adjusted Operating Ratio," and "Adjusted EPS," as we define them, are not presented in accordance with GAAP. These financial measures supplement our GAAP results in evaluating certain aspects of our business. We believe that using these measures improves comparability in analyzing our performance because they remove the impact of items from our operating results that, in our opinion, do not reflect our core operating performance. Management and the board of directors focus on Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted Operating Ratio and Adjusted EPS as key measures of our performance, all of which are reconciled to the most comparable GAAP financial measures and further discussed below. We believe our presentation of these non-GAAP financial measures is useful because it provides investors and securities analysts the same information that we use internally for purposes of assessing our core operating performance and compliance with debt covenants.

Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted Operating Ratio and Adjusted EPS are not substitutes for their comparable GAAP financial measures, such as net income, cash flows from operating activities, operating margin, or other measures prescribed by GAAP. There are limitations to using non-GAAP financial measures. Although we believe that they improve comparability in analyzing our period to period performance, they could limit comparability to other companies in our industry if those companies define these measures differently. Because of these limitations, our non-GAAP financial measures should not be considered measures of income generated by our business or discretionary cash available to us to invest in the growth of our business. Management compensates for these limitations by primarily relying on GAAP results and using non-GAAP financial measures on a supplemental basis.

Adjusted EBITDA — Our definition of the non-GAAP measure, Adjusted EBITDA, starts with (a) net income (loss), the most comparable GAAP measure. We add the following items back to (a) to arrive at Adjusted EBITDA:


(i)	depreciation and amortization,


(ii)	interest and derivative interest expense, including fees and charges associated with indebtedness, net of interest income,


(iii)	income taxes,


(iv)	non-cash equity compensation expense,


(v)	non-cash impairments,


(vi)	other special non-cash items, and


(vii)	excludable transaction costs.

Table of Contents Glossary of Terms

SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED) — CONTINUED

We believe that Adjusted EBITDA is a relevant measure for estimating the cash generated by our operations that would be available to cover capital expenditures, taxes, interest and other investments and that it enhances an investor’s understanding of our financial performance. We use Adjusted EBITDA for business planning purposes and in measuring our performance relative to that of our competitors. Our method of computing Adjusted EBITDA is consistent with that used in our debt covenants, specifically our leverage ratio, and is also routinely reviewed by management for that purpose.

~~Table of ContentsGlossary of Terms~~

~~SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY~~

~~MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED) — CONTINUED~~

The following table is a GAAP to non-GAAP reconciliation for consolidated Adjusted EBITDA:


	Three Months Ended March 31,						Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2015			2014			2015			2014			2015			2014
	(In thousands)						(In thousands)
Net income	$	37,840		$	12,305		$	50,954		$	40,198		$	88,794		$	52,503
Adjusted for:
Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment	56,927			56,175			60,415			54,791			117,342			110,966
Amortization of intangibles	4,204			4,204			4,203			4,203			8,407			8,407
Interest expense	10,388			23,225			10,109			21,453			20,497			44,678
Derivative interest expense	2,793			1,653			1,111			1,618			3,904			3,271
Interest income	(587		)	(766		)	(591		)	(692		)	(1,178		)	(1,458		)
Income tax expense	23,691			7,704			31,877			25,165			55,568			32,869
EBITDA	135,256			104,500			158,078			146,736			293,334			251,236
Non-cash equity compensation ⁽²⁾	1,483			1,061			1,400			1,292			2,883			2,353
Loss on debt extinguishment ⁽³⁾	—			2,913			—			6,990			—			9,903
Non-cash impairments of non-operating assets ⁽⁴⁾	1,480			—			—			—			1,480			—
Adjusted EBITDA ⁽¹⁾	$	138,219		$	108,474		$	159,478		$	155,018		$	297,697		$	263,492

____________


(1)	Our method of computing Adjusted EBITDA is consistent with that used in our debt covenants, specifically our leverage ratio, and is also routinely reviewed by management for that purpose.


(2)	Non-cash equity compensation expense is presented on a pre-tax basis. In accordance with the terms of the 2014 Agreement, this expense is added back in the calculation of Adjusted EBITDA for covenant compliance purposes.


(3)	Refer to the "Loss on Debt Extinguishment" discussion under "Results of Operations — Consolidated Operating and Other Expenses," below.


(4)	Refer to "Non-cash Impairments of Non-operating Assets" discussion under "Results of Operations -— Consolidated Operating and Other Expenses," below.

Adjusted Operating Ratio — Our definition of the non-GAAP measure, Adjusted Operating Ratio, starts with (a) operating expense and (b) operating revenue, which are GAAP financial measures. We subtract the following items from (a) to arrive at (c) adjusted operating expense:


(i)	fuel surcharge revenue,


(ii)	amortization of the intangibles from our 2007 going-private transaction,


(iii)	non-cash operating impairment charges,


(iv)	other special non-cash items, and


(v)	excludable transaction costs.

We then subtract fuel surcharge revenue from (b) to arrive at (d) Revenue xFSR. Adjusted Operating Ratio is equal to (c) adjusted operating expense as a percentage of (d) Revenue xFSR.

We net fuel surcharge revenue against fuel expense in the calculation of our Adjusted Operating Ratio, thereby excluding fuel surcharge revenue from operating revenue in the denominator. Because fuel surcharge revenue is so volatile, we believe excluding it provides for more transparency and comparability. Additionally, we believe that comparability of our performance is improved by excluding impairments, non-comparable intangibles from the 2007 Transactions and other special items.

2627

Table of Contents Glossary of Terms

SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED) — CONTINUED

The following table is a GAAP to non-GAAP reconciliation for consolidated Adjusted Operating Ratio:


	Three Months Ended March 31,						Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2015			2014			2015			2014			2015			2014
	(Dollars in thousands)						(Dollars in thousands)
Operating revenue	$	1,015,144		$	1,008,446		$	1,059,404		$	1,075,898		$	2,074,548		$	2,084,344
Less: Fuel surcharge revenue	120,280			191,447			123,505			199,561			243,785			391,008
Revenue xFSR	894,864			816,999			935,899			876,337			1,830,763			1,693,336

Operating expense	940,144			962,276			960,928			981,876			1,901,072			1,944,152
Adjusted for:
Fuel surcharge revenue	(120,280		)	(191,447		)	(123,505		)	(199,561		)	(243,785		)	(391,008		)
Amortization of certain intangibles ⁽¹⁾	(3,912		)	(3,912		)	(3,912		)	(3,912		)	(7,824		)	(7,824		)
Adjusted operating expense	815,952			766,917			833,511			778,403			1,649,463			1,545,320
Adjusted operating income	$	78,912		$	50,082		$	102,388		$	97,934		$	181,300		$	148,016
Operating Ratio	92.6		%	95.4		%	90.7		%	91.3		%	91.6		%	93.3		%
Adjusted Operating Ratio	91.2		%	93.9		%	89.1		%	88.8		%	90.1		%	91.3		%

____________


(1)	"Amortization of certain intangibles" specifically reflects the non-cash amortization expense relating to certain intangible assets identified in the 2007 Transactions through which Swift Corporation acquired Swift Transportation Co.

Adjusted EPS — Our definition of the non-GAAP measure, Adjusted EPS, starts with (a) income (loss) before income taxes, the most comparable GAAP measure. We add the following items back to (a) to arrive at (b) adjusted income (loss) before income taxes:


(i)	amortization of the intangibles from the 2007 Transactions,


(ii)	non-cash impairments,


(iii)	other special non-cash items,


(iv)	excludable transaction costs,


(v)	mark-to-market adjustments on our interest rate swaps, recognized in the income statement, and


(vi)	amortization of previous losses recorded in AOCI related to the interest rate swaps we terminated upon our IPO and refinancing transactions in December 2010.

We subtract income taxes, at the GAAP effective tax rate, from (b) to arrive at (c) adjusted earnings. Adjusted EPS is equal to (c) divided by weighted average diluted shares outstanding. Since the numbers reflected in the table below are calculated on a per share basis, they may not foot due to rounding.

We believe that excluding the impact of derivatives provides for more transparency and comparability since these transactions have historically been volatile. Additionally, we believe that comparability of our performance is improved by excluding impairments that are unrelated to our core operations, as well as intangibles from the 2007 Transactions and other special items that are non-comparable in nature.

The following table is a GAAP to non-GAAP reconciliation for consolidated Adjusted EPS:


	Three Months Ended March 31,				Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2015		2014		2015		2014		2015		2014
Diluted earnings per share	$	0.26	$	0.09	$	0.35	$	0.28	$	0.62	$	0.37
Adjusted for:
Income tax expense	0.16		0.05		0.22		0.18		0.39		0.23
Income before income taxes	0.43		0.14		0.57		0.46		1.00		0.60
Non-cash impairments of non-operating assets ⁽²⁾	0.01		—		—		—		0.01		—
Loss on debt extinguishment⁽³⁾	—		0.02		—		0.05		—		0.07
Amortization of certain intangibles ⁽⁴⁾	0.03		0.03		0.03		0.03		0.05		0.05
Adjusted income before income taxes	0.46		0.19		0.60		0.53		1.06		0.72
Provision for income tax expense at effective rate	0.18		0.07		0.23		0.20		0.41		0.28
Adjusted EPS⁽¹⁾	$	0.29	$	0.12	$	0.37	$	0.33	$	0.65	$	0.44

2728

Table of Contents Glossary of Terms

SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED) — CONTINUED

____________


(1)	In calculating diluted shares outstanding for the purposes of Adjusted EPS, the dilutive effect of outstanding stock options is only included for the period following our IPO when a market price was available to assess the dilutive effect of such options.


(2)	Refer to footnote (4) to the Adjusted EBITDA reconciliation for a description of "Non-cash impairments of non-operating assets."


(3)	Refer to footnote (3) to the Adjusted EBITDA reconciliation for a description of "Loss on ~~Debt Extinguishment" discussion under "Results of Operations — Consolidated Operating and Other Expenses,~~debt extinguishment." ~~below.~~


(4)	Refer to footnote (1) to the Adjusted Operating Ratio reconciliation for a description of items in "Amortization of certain intangibles."

Results of Operations — Segment Review

We operate four reportable segments: Truckload, Dedicated, Central Refrigerated and Intermodal. The descriptions of the operations of these reportable segments are described in Note 14 to the consolidated financial statements, included in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Consolidating tables for operating revenue and operating income are as follows:


	Three Months Ended March 31,						Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2015			2014			2015			2014			2015			2014
	(In thousands)						(In thousands)
Operating revenue:
Truckload	$	538,341		$	553,057		$	555,715		$	575,481		$	1,094,056		$	1,128,538
Dedicated	217,775			193,653			234,213			223,098			451,988			416,751
Central Refrigerated	95,568			106,763			97,688			106,911			193,256			213,674
Intermodal	90,354			91,313			98,507			100,911			188,861			192,224
Subtotal	942,038			944,786			986,123			1,006,401			1,928,161			1,951,187
Non-reportable segment	91,622			75,666			93,869			83,491			185,491			159,157
Intersegment eliminations	(18,516		)	(12,006		)	(20,588		)	(13,994		)	(39,104		)	(26,000		)
Operating revenue	$	1,015,144		$	1,008,446		$	1,059,404		$	1,075,898		$	2,074,548		$	2,084,344


	Three Months Ended March 31,						Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2015			2014			2015			2014			2015		2014
	(In thousands)						(In thousands)
Operating income (loss):
Truckload	$	56,854		$	31,907		$	67,944		$	69,596		$	124,798	$	101,503
Dedicated	14,345			11,530			22,967			21,112			37,312		32,642
Central Refrigerated	4,799			2,420			6,117			3,662			10,916		6,082
Intermodal	(1,243		)	(926		)	1,601			(495		)	358		(1,421		)
Subtotal	74,755			44,931			98,629			93,875			173,384		138,806
Non-reportable segment	245			1,239			(153		)	147			92		1,386
Operating income	$	75,000		$	46,170		$	98,476		$	94,022		$	173,476	$	140,192

Our chief operating decision makers monitor the GAAP results of our reporting segments, as supplemented by certain non-GAAP information. Refer to "Non-GAAP Financial Measures" above for more details. Additionally, we use a number of primary indicators to monitor our revenue and expense performance and efficiency.

Weekly Revenue xFSR per Tractor (monitored monthly) — This is our primary measure of productivity for our Truckload, Dedicated and Central Refrigerated segments. Weekly Revenue xFSR per tractor is affected by the following factors, which are typically monitored daily:

loaded miles (miles driven when hauling freight);

fleet size (because available loads are spread over available tractors);

2829

Table of Contents Glossary of Terms

SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED) — CONTINUED

~~fleet size (because available loads are spread over available tractors);~~

rates received for our services; and

network balance (number of loads accepted, compared to available trucks, by market).

We strive to increase our revenue per tractor by improving freight rates with customers, hauling more loads with existing equipment, effectively moving freight and managing balance within our network, maintaining our tractors, and recruiting and retaining drivers and owner-operators.

Deadhead Miles Percentage (monitored daily) — This is calculated by dividing the number of unpaid miles by the total number of miles driven. We monitor deadhead miles percentage in Truckload and Central Refrigerated, as we strive to reduce our number of deadhead miles within these segments. By balancing our freight flows and planning consecutive loads with shorter distances between the drop-off and pick-up locations, we are able to reduce the percentage of deadhead miles driven to allow for more revenue-generating miles during our drivers’ hours-of-service. This also enables us to reduce wage, fuel and other costs associated with deadhead miles.

Average Operational Truck Count (monitored daily) — We use this measure for all of our reportable segments. It includes tractors driven by company drivers as well as owner-operator units. This measure changes based on our ability to adjust our fleet size in response to changes in demand.

Load Count and Average Container Count (monitored daily) — Within Intermodal, we monitor load count and average container count. These metrics allow us to measure our utilization of our container fleet.

Adjusted Operating Ratio (monitored monthly) — We consider this ratio an important measure of our operating profitability for each of our reportable segments. We define and reconcile Adjusted Operating Ratio under "Non-GAAP Financial Measures," above. GAAP Operating Ratio is operating expenses as a percentage of revenue, or the inverse of operating margin, and produces an indication of operating efficiency. It is widely used in our industry as an assessment of management’s effectiveness in controlling all categories of operating expenses.

~~Load Count and Average Container Count~~ ~~(monitored daily) — Within Intermodal, we monitor load count and average container count. These metrics allow us to measure our utilization of our container fleet.~~

~~Truckload Segment~~

Three Months Ended March 31,
2015 2014
(Dollars and miles in thousands, except per tractor amounts)
Operating revenue $ 538,341
$ 553,057
Operating income $ 56,854
$ 31,907
Operating Ratio 89.4 % 94.2 %
Adjusted Operating Ratio 87.9 % 92.8 %
Weekly Revenue xFSR per tractor $ 3,461
$ 3,225
Total loaded miles 254,926
254,426
Deadhead miles percentage 11.8 % 11.7 %
Average operational truck count:
Company 7,334
7,151
Owner-Operator 3,201
3,484
Total 10,535
10,635

~~Table of ContentsGlossary of Terms~~

~~SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY~~

~~MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED) — CONTINUED~~

The following ~~table is a~~tables are GAAP to non-GAAP ~~reconciliation~~reconciliations for ~~the Truckload~~each segment's Adjusted Operating Ratio:

Three Months Ended March 31,
2015 2014
(Dollars in thousands)
Operating revenue $ 538,341
$ 553,057
Less: Fuel surcharge revenue 69,561
111,648
Revenue xFSR 468,780
441,409

Operating expense 481,487
521,150
Adjusted for: Fuel surcharge revenue (69,561 ) (111,648 )
Adjusted operating expense 411,926
409,502
Adjusted operating income $ 56,854
$ 31,907
Adjusted Operating Ratio 87.9 % 92.8 %

Truckload ~~Revenue —~~ Truckload operating revenue decreased by $14.7 million, or 2.7%, for the three months ended March 31, 2015, as compared to the same period in 2014. However, Truckload Revenue xFSR increased by $27.4 million, or 6.2%, for the three months ended March 31, 2015, as compared to the same period in 2014. The following factors were contributors (offsets) to the increase in Truckload Revenue xFSR:

~~a 6.0% increase in Revenue xFSR per loaded mile, primarily driven by contractual rate increases and freight mix,~~

~~a 1.1% increase in loaded miles per tractor per week, and~~

~~a (0.9%) decrease in average operational truck count.~~

~~Truckload Operating Income —~~ Truckload operating income increased by $24.9 million, or 78.2%, for the three months ended March 31, 2015, as compared to the same period in 2014. This resulted in an improvement in Adjusted Operating Ratio of 490 basis points, which was driven by contractual rate increases, improved utilization and lower fuel expense. Declining fuel prices, better fuel efficiency and reduced idle engine time contributed to the decrease in fuel expense for the three months ended March 31, 2015, as compared to the same period in 2014. Increases in driver wages and owner-operator contracted pay rates partially offset the improvement in Adjusted Operating Ratio.

~~Dedicated~~ Segment

Three Months Ended March 31,
2015 2014
(Dollars in thousands, except per tractor amounts)
Operating revenue $ 217,775
$ 193,653
Operating income $ 14,345
$ 11,530
Operating Ratio 93.4 % 94.0 %
Adjusted Operating Ratio 92.7 % 92.7 %
Weekly Revenue xFSR per tractor $ 3,204
$ 3,173
Average operational truck count:
Company 3,882
3,161
Owner-Operator 879
691
Total 4,761
3,852



	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2015			2014			2015			2014
	(Dollars in thousands)
Operating revenue	$	555,715		$	575,481		$	1,094,056		$	1,128,538
Less: Fuel surcharge revenue	70,281			116,414			139,842			228,062
Revenue xFSR	485,434			459,067			954,214			900,476

Operating expense	487,771			505,885			969,258			1,027,035
Adjusted for: Fuel surcharge revenue	(70,281		)	(116,414		)	(139,842		)	(228,062		)
Adjusted operating expense	417,490			389,471			829,416			798,973
Adjusted operating income	$	67,944		$	69,596		$	124,798		$	101,503
Operating Ratio	87.8		%	87.9		%	88.6		%	91.0		%
Adjusted Operating Ratio	86.0		%	84.8		%	86.9		%	88.7		%

Table of Contents Glossary of Terms

SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED) — CONTINUED

~~The following table is a GAAP to non-GAAP reconciliation for the~~ Dedicated ~~segment's Adjusted Operating Ratio:~~Segment

Three Months Ended March 31,
2015 2014
(Dollars in thousands)
Operating revenue $ 217,775
$ 193,653
Less: Fuel surcharge revenue 21,642
36,534
Revenue xFSR 196,133
157,119

Operating expense 203,430
182,123
Adjusted for: Fuel surcharge revenue (21,642 ) (36,534 )
Adjusted operating expense 181,788
145,589
Adjusted operating income $ 14,345
$ 11,530
Adjusted Operating Ratio 92.7 % 92.7 %

~~Dedicated Revenue —~~ ~~Dedicated operating revenue increased by $24.1 million, or 12.5%, for the three months ended March 31, 2015, as compared to the same period in 2014.~~ Dedicated Revenue xFSR increased by $39.0 million, or 24.8%, as compared to the same period in 2014. The increase in revenue was driven by various new customer contracts entered into over the last twelve months, which contributed to the 23.6% increase in average operational truck count. Additionally, weekly Revenue xFSR per tractor increased 1.0% to $3,204 due to improvements in pricing, utilization and deadhead.

~~Dedicated Operating Income —~~ ~~Dedicated operating income increased by~~$2.8 million, or 24.4%, for the three months ended March 31, 2015, as compared to the same period in 2014. Dedicated Adjusted Operating Ratio remained flat for the three months ended March 31, 2015, as compared to the same period in 2014. In addition to the favorable revenue impact of increases in average operational truck count and weekly Revenue xFSR per tractor, Adjusted Operating Ratio was favorably impacted by recently implemented safety initiatives that resulted in a slight reduction in our insurance and claims expense as a percentage of Revenue xFSR. These improvements were offset by increases in driver wages and owner-operator contracted pay rates. The fuel benefit from declining fuel prices had a limited impact on the Dedicated segment because many of our Dedicated contracts have unique fuel recovery characteristics that drive consistency in net fuel expense between periods, as compared to our over-the-road Truckload contracts.



	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2015			2014			2015			2014
	(Dollars in thousands)
Operating revenue	$	234,213		$	223,098		$	451,988		$	416,751
Less: Fuel surcharge revenue	23,256			39,775			44,898			76,309
Revenue xFSR	210,957			183,323			407,090			340,442

Operating expense	211,246			201,986			414,676			384,109
Adjusted for: Fuel surcharge revenue	(23,256		)	(39,775		)	(44,898		)	(76,309		)
Adjusted operating expense	187,990			162,211			369,778			307,800
Adjusted operating income	$	22,967		$	21,112		$	37,312		$	32,642
Operating Ratio	90.2		%	90.5		%	91.7		%	92.2		%
Adjusted Operating Ratio	89.1		%	88.5		%	90.8		%	90.4		%

Central Refrigerated Segment

Three Months Ended March 31,
2015 2014
(Dollars and miles in thousands, except per tractor amounts)
Operating revenue $ 95,568
$ 106,763
Operating income $ 4,799
$ 2,420
Operating Ratio 95.0 % 97.7 %
Adjusted Operating Ratio 94.1 % 97.1 %
Weekly Revenue xFSR per tractor $ 3,405
$ 3,235
Total loaded miles 41,880
42,757
Deadhead miles percentage 14.0 % 14.0 %
Average operational truck count:
Company 1,263
1,057
Owner-Operator 589
955
Total 1,852
2,012



	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2015			2014			2015			2014
	(Dollars in thousands)
Operating revenue	$	97,688		$	106,911		$	193,256		$	213,674
Less: Fuel surcharge revenue	14,410			20,941			28,878			44,118
Revenue xFSR	83,278			85,970			164,378			169,556

Operating expense	91,571			103,249			182,340			207,592
Adjusted for: Fuel surcharge revenue	(14,410		)	(20,941		)	(28,878		)	(44,118		)
Adjusted operating expense	77,161			82,308			153,462			163,474
Adjusted operating income	$	6,117		$	3,662		$	10,916		$	6,082
Operating Ratio	93.7		%	96.6		%	94.4		%	97.2		%
Adjusted Operating Ratio	92.7		%	95.7		%	93.4		%	96.4		%

Intermodal Segment



	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2015			2014			2015			2014
	(Dollars in thousands)
Operating revenue	$	98,507		$	100,911		$	188,861		$	192,224
Less: Fuel surcharge revenue	13,664			20,104			26,754			38,468
Revenue xFSR	84,843			80,807			162,107			153,756

Operating expense	96,906			101,406			188,503			193,645
Adjusted for: Fuel surcharge revenue	(13,664		)	(20,104		)	(26,754		)	(38,468		)
Adjusted operating expense	83,242			81,302			161,749			155,177
Adjusted operating income (loss)	$	1,601		$	(495	)	$	358		$	(1,421	)
Operating Ratio	98.4		%	100.5		%	99.8		%	100.7		%
Adjusted Operating Ratio	98.1		%	100.6		%	99.8		%	100.9		%

Table of Contents Glossary of Terms

SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED) — CONTINUED

~~The following table is~~Driver Wages and Owner-operator Pay Rates — We implemented increases in wages for our company drivers and contracted pay rates for our owner-operators in August 2014 and May 2015. These increases were tailored at improving driver retention and recruiting and are having a ~~GAAP~~short-term negative impact on profitability, given the immediate effect of driver wage and pay rate increases on expense, versus the more gradual effect of customer pricing increases on revenue. We refer to ~~non-GAAP reconciliation~~these increases in company driver wages and owner-operator contracted pay rates throughout the segment review below.

Segment Review for the ~~Central Refrigerated segment's Adjusted Operating Ratio:~~Three Months Ended June 30, 2015, Compared to the Three Months Ended June 30, 2014

Truckload Segment

Three Months Ended March 31,
2015 2014
(Dollars in thousands)
Operating revenue $ 95,568
$ 106,763
Less: Fuel surcharge revenue 14,468
23,177
Revenue xFSR 81,100
83,586

Operating expense 90,769
104,343
Adjusted for: Fuel surcharge revenue (14,468 ) (23,177 )
Adjusted operating expense 76,301
81,166
Adjusted operating income $ 4,799
$ 2,420
Adjusted Operating Ratio 94.1 % 97.1 %



	Three Months Ended June 30,						Increase (Decrease)
	2015			2014			Amount			Percentage
	(Dollars and miles in thousands, except per tractor amounts)
Operating revenue	$	555,715		$	575,481		$	(19,766	)	(3.4	)%
Revenue xFSR	$	485,434		$	459,067		$	26,367		5.7	%
Operating income	$	67,944		$	69,596		$	(1,652	)	(2.4	)%
Operating Ratio	87.8		%	87.9		%				(0.1	)%
Adjusted Operating Ratio	86.0		%	84.8		%				1.2	%
Weekly Revenue xFSR per tractor	$	3,571		$	3,453		$	118		3.4	%
Total loaded miles	261,609			259,583			2,026			0.8	%
Deadhead miles percentage	11.8		%	11.7		%				0.1	%
Average operational truck count:
Company	7,465			6,822			643			9.4	%
Owner-Operator	2,991			3,406			(415		)	(12.2	)%
Total	10,456			10,228			228			2.2	%

~~Central Refrigerated~~Truckload Revenue — ~~Central Refrigerated~~Although operating revenue decreased, ~~by $11.2 million, or 10.5%,~~Revenue xFSR increased 5.7% for the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015, as compared to the same period in 2014. The following factors were contributors to the increase in Revenue xFSR:

4.9% increase in Revenue xFSR ~~decreased~~per loaded mile, primarily driven by ~~$2.5 million, or 3.0%, for~~pricing increases.

0.8% increase in total loaded miles.

The following factors were contributors (offsets) to the 3.4% increase in weekly Revenue xFSR per tractor:

4.9% increase in Revenue xFSR per loaded mile.

(1.5)% decrease in loaded miles per tractor per week. Severe weather conditions during the three months ended March 31, ~~2015, as compared to~~2014 shifted demand into the ~~same~~subsequent period, which resulted in ~~2014, which was driven by an 8.0% reduction~~unseasonably strong utilization in average operational truck count, partially offset by a 5.3% increase in weekly Revenue xFSR per tractor. The increase in weekly Revenue xFSR per tractor was comprised of a 6.4% increase in loaded miles per tractor per week, partially offset by a 0.9% decrease in Revenue xFSR per loaded mile. Due to the unique requirements of a large Central Refrigerated dedicated customer account, as well as a lack of attaining profitability targets, we discontinued servicing the account, effective January 31, 2015. This account had a much lower average length of haul, higher deadhead and much higher Revenue xFSR per loaded mile, compared to other customer accounts. Excluding the impact of this dedicated account, Revenue xFSR per loaded mile increased by 4.7% for the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2014. Additionally, we experienced disruption associated with trading and in-servicing more tractors in the three months ended June 30, 2015, as compared to the same period in 2014. ~~Further impacts to these metrics are expected in~~This was the result of our acceleration of the average trade-in cycle for our tractors, as well as manufacturer delays.

Truckload Operating Income — Operating income decreased for the three months ended June 30, ~~2015.~~

~~Central Refrigerated Operating Income —~~ ~~Central Refrigerated operating income increased by $2.4 million, or 98.3%, for the three months ended March 31,~~ 2015, as compared to the same period in 2014. This resulted in a 120 basis point deterioration in Adjusted Operating Ratio, ~~improved~~primarily caused by ~~300 basis points, which~~the increases in wages for our company drivers and contracted pay rates for owner-operators, discussed above. The impact of the wage and pay rate increases was ~~driven by increased loaded miles per tractor per week and lower fuel prices,~~ partially offset by ~~increased insurance~~increases in customer pricing, as well as reduced fuel expense associated with declining fuel prices and ~~claims expense.~~better fuel efficiency.

~~Intermodal Segment~~

Three Months Ended March 31,
2015 2014
(Dollars in thousands)
Operating revenue $ 90,354
$ 91,313
Operating loss $ (1,243 ) $ (926 )
Operating Ratio 101.4 % 101.0 %
Adjusted Operating Ratio 101.6 % 101.3 %
Average operational truck count:
Company 481
378
Owner-Operator 87
73
Total 568
451
Load count 41,940
38,603
Average container count 9,150
8,717

Table of Contents Glossary of Terms

SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED) — CONTINUED

~~The following table is a GAAP to non-GAAP reconciliation for the Intermodal segment's Adjusted Operating Ratio:~~Dedicated Segment

Three Months Ended March 31,
2015 2014
(Dollars in thousands)
Operating revenue $ 90,354
$ 91,313
Less: Fuel surcharge revenue 13,090
18,364
Revenue xFSR 77,264
72,949

Operating expense 91,597
92,239
Adjusted for: Fuel surcharge revenue (13,090 ) (18,364 )
Adjusted operating expense 78,507
73,875
Adjusted operating loss $ (1,243 ) $ (926 )
Adjusted Operating Ratio 101.6 % 101.3 %



	Three Months Ended June 30,						Increase (Decrease)
	2015			2014			Amount		Percentage
	(Dollars in thousands, except per tractor amounts)
Operating revenue	$	234,213		$	223,098		$	11,115	5.0	%
Revenue xFSR	$	210,957		$	183,323		$	27,634	15.1	%
Operating income	$	22,967		$	21,112		$	1,855	8.8	%
Operating Ratio	90.2		%	90.5		%			(0.3	)%
Adjusted Operating Ratio	89.1		%	88.5		%			0.6	%
Weekly Revenue xFSR per tractor	$	3,343		$	3,191		$	152	4.8	%
Average operational truck count:
Company	3,983			3,650			333		9.1	%
Owner-Operator	871			770			101		13.1	%
Total	4,854			4,420			434		9.8	%

~~Intermodal~~Dedicated Revenue — ~~Intermodal operating~~Operating revenue ~~decreased by $1.0 million, or 1.1%,~~increased for the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015, as compared to the same period in 2014. ~~Intermodal~~Additionally, Revenue xFSR increased 15.1%, driven by ~~$4.3 million, or 5.9%,~~multiple new customer contracts entered into over the last twelve months, which also contributed to the increase in average operational truck count. Weekly Revenue xFSR per tractor increased due to improved pricing and utilization.

Dedicated Operating Income — Operating income increased for the three months ended March 31, 2015, as compared to the same period in 2014, driven by an 8.6% increase in load counts. COFC loads increased by 16.1%, while TOFC loads decreased by 59.0%, as we shifted away from the unprofitable refrigerated TOFC business. Revenue xFSR per load decreased 2.5% due to the mix shift to COFC from TOFC, as well as the slowdown of West Coast volumes resulting from the port labor disruptions. As such our East Coast volumes represented a larger portion of the total, reducing our average length of haul, which in turn reduced our average revenue per load.

~~Intermodal Operating Loss —~~ ~~Intermodal operating loss increased by $0.3 million, or 34.2%, for the three months ended March 31,~~June 30, 2015, as compared to the same period in 2014. ~~Intermodal~~ Adjusted Operating Ratio deteriorated by 3060 basis points, due to an anticipated increase in insurance and claims expense, as well as the increases in company driver wages and owner-operator contracted pay rates, discussed above. The impact of these increased expenses was largely offset by the improvements in pricing and utilization, noted above.

Central Refrigerated Segment



	Three Months Ended June 30,						Increase (Decrease)
	2015			2014			Amount			Percentage
	(Dollars and miles in thousands, except per tractor amounts)
Operating revenue	$	97,688		$	106,911		$	(9,223	)	(8.6	)%
Revenue xFSR	$	83,278		$	85,970		$	(2,692	)	(3.1	)%
Operating income	$	6,117		$	3,662		$	2,455		67.0	%
Operating Ratio	93.7		%	96.6		%				(2.9	)%
Adjusted Operating Ratio	92.7		%	95.7		%				(3.0	)%
Weekly Revenue xFSR per tractor	$	3,418		$	3,543		$	(125	)	(3.5	)%
Total loaded miles	43,215			42,937			278			0.6	%
Deadhead miles percentage	13.9		%	15.1		%				(1.2	)%
Average operational truck count:
Company	1,283			1,057			226			21.4	%
Owner-Operator	591			810			(219		)	(27.0	)%
Total	1,874			1,867			7			0.4	%

Central Refrigerated Revenue — Operating revenue decreased for the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015, as compared to the same period in 2014. ~~The West Coast port issues resulted~~Additionally, Revenue xFSR decreased by 3.1%, primarily driven by a 3.7% reduction in an increased usage of lower-priced spot business off of the West Coast, in an effort to keep our container network balanced. The impact of the West Coast port issues, relative to the Intermodal fleet size significantly impacted profitability in this segment, but wasRevenue xFSR per loaded mile, partially offset by a ~~10.6% improvement~~0.6% increase in ~~container turns, as well as improvements in dray efficiency~~total loaded miles.

In January 2015, we ceased servicing a large Central Refrigerated specialty dedicated account. This dedicated account was not profitable and ~~safety trends.~~

~~Non-reportable Segment~~

Three Months Ended March 31,
2015 2014
(In thousands)
Operating revenue $ 91,622
$ 75,666
Operating income 245
1,239

~~Non-reportable Segment~~skewed our operational metrics since it operated with a much lower average length of haul, higher deadhead and much higher Revenue — ~~Operating revenue within our non-reportable segment increased by $16.0 million, or 21.1%, for the three months ended March 31, 2015,~~xFSR per loaded mile, as compared to the same period in 2014. This was primarily driven by growth in our logistics business, increased services to owner-operators and an increase in intercompany leasing between our IEL subsidiary and our Truckload and Dedicated segments.

~~Non-reportable Segment Operating Income —~~ ~~Operating income within our non-reportable segment decreased by $1.0 million, or 80.2%, for the three months ended March 31, 2015, as compared to the same period in 2014.~~other accounts.

Table of Contents Glossary of Terms

SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED) — CONTINUED

Central Refrigerated Operating Income — Operating income increased 67.0% for the three months ended June 30, 2015, as compared to the same period in 2014. We ceased servicing the unprofitable specialty dedicated account, fuel prices declined and we benefited from other operational improvements, all of which more than offset the aforementioned increases in company driver wages and owner-operator contracted pay rates as well as increased insurance and claims expense, generating a 300 basis-point improvement in Adjusted Operating Ratio.

Intermodal Segment



	Three Months Ended June 30,						Increase (Decrease)
	2015			2014			Amount			Percentage
	(Dollars in thousands)
Operating revenue	$	98,507		$	100,911		$	(2,404	)	(2.4	)%
Revenue xFSR	$	84,843		$	80,807		$	4,036		5.0	%
Operating income (loss)	$	1,601		$	(495	)	$	2,096		423.4	%
Operating Ratio	98.4		%	100.5		%				(2.1	)%
Adjusted Operating Ratio	98.1		%	100.6		%				(2.5	)%
Average operational truck count:
Company	521			409			112			27.4	%
Owner-Operator	95			68			27			39.7	%
Total	616			477			139			29.1	%
Load count	46,517			43,404			3,113			7.2	%
Average container count	9,150			8,717			433			5.0	%

Intermodal Revenue — Although operating revenue decreased for the three months ended June 30, 2015, as compared to the same period in 2014, Revenue xFSR increased 5.0%. The following factors were contributors (offsets) to the increase in Revenue xFSR:

7.2% increase in load counts. COFC loads increased 14.6%, while TOFC loads decreased 65.4%, as we shifted away from the unprofitable refrigerated TOFC business in 2014.

(2.0)% decrease in Revenue xFSR per load, primarily due to the mix shift to COFC from TOFC.

Intermodal Operating Income (Loss) — Intermodal's operating results improved from an operating loss in the three months ended June 30, 2014 to operating income in the three months ended June 30, 2015. Adjusted Operating Ratio improved 250 basis points, which was driven by a 9.1% increase in container turns, as well as improvements in dray efficiencies and safety trends.

Non-reportable Segment



	Three Months Ended June 30,					Increase (Decrease)
	2015			2014		Amount			Percentage
	(In thousands)
Operating revenue	$	93,869		$	83,491	$	10,378		12.4	%
Operating (loss) income	$	(153	)	$	147	$	(300	)	(204.1	)%

Non-reportable Segment Revenue — Operating revenue within our non-reportable segment increased for the three months ended June 30, 2015, as compared to the same period in 2014. This was primarily driven by growth in the logistics business.

Table of Contents Glossary of Terms

SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED) — CONTINUED

Segment Review for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2015, Compared to the Six Months Ended June 30, 2014

Truckload Segment



	Six Months Ended June 30,						Increase (Decrease)
	2015			2014			Amount			Percentage
	(Dollars and miles in thousands, except per tractor amounts)
Operating revenue	$	1,094,056		$	1,128,538		$	(34,482	)	(3.1	)%
Revenue xFSR	$	954,214		$	900,476		$	53,738		6.0	%
Operating income	$	124,798		$	101,503		$	23,295		23.0	%
Operating Ratio	88.6		%	91.0		%				(2.4	)%
Adjusted Operating Ratio	86.9		%	88.7		%				(1.8	)%
Weekly Revenue xFSR per tractor	$	3,516		$	3,335		$	181		5.4	%
Total loaded miles	516,535			514,009			2,526			0.5	%
Deadhead miles percentage	11.8		%	11.7		%				0.1	%
Average operational truck count:
Company	7,400			6,987			413			5.9	%
Owner-Operator	3,096			3,445			(349		)	(10.1	)%
Total	10,496			10,432			64			0.6	%

Truckload Revenue — Although operating revenue decreased, Revenue xFSR increased 6.0% for the six months ended June 30, 2015, as compared to the same period in 2014. The following factors were contributors to the increase in Revenue xFSR:

5.5% increase in Revenue xFSR per loaded mile, primarily driven by pricing increases and freight mix.

0.5% increase in total loaded miles.

Truckload Operating Income — Operating income increased for the six months ended June 30, 2015, as compared to the same period in 2014. Despite the impact of the wage increases for company drivers and contracted pay rate increases for owner-operators, Adjusted Operating Ratio improved 180 basis points for the six months ended June 30, 2015, as compared to the same period in 2014. The improvement was driven by customer pricing increases, declining fuel prices, better fuel efficiency and reduced engine idle time.

Dedicated Segment



	Six Months Ended June 30,						Increase (Decrease)
	2015			2014			Amount		Percentage
	(Dollars in thousands, except per tractor amounts)
Operating revenue	$	451,988		$	416,751		$	35,237	8.5	%
Revenue xFSR	$	407,090		$	340,442		$	66,648	19.6	%
Operating income	$	37,312		$	32,642		$	4,670	14.3	%
Operating Ratio	91.7		%	92.2		%			(0.5	)%
Adjusted Operating Ratio	90.8		%	90.4		%			0.4	%
Weekly Revenue xFSR per tractor	$	3,275		$	3,184		$	91	2.9	%
Average operational truck count:
Company	3,933			3,405			528		15.5	%
Owner-Operator	875			731			144		19.7	%
Total	4,808			4,136			672		16.2	%

Dedicated Revenue — Operating revenue increased for the six months ended June 30, 2015, as compared to the same period in 2014. Revenue xFSR increased 19.6%, driven by multiple new customer contracts entered into over the last twelve months, which also contributed to the increase in average operational truck count. Weekly Revenue xFSR per tractor increased due to improved pricing and customer mix.

Table of Contents Glossary of Terms

SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED) — CONTINUED

Dedicated Operating Income — Operating income increased for the six months ended June 30, 2015, as compared to the same period in 2014. Adjusted Operating Ratio deteriorated by 40 basis points, due to the wage increases for company drivers and contracted pay rate increases for owner-operators, discussed above, as well as increased insurance and claims expense. The impact of these increased expenses was largely offset by the improvements in pricing and customer mix, noted above.

Central Refrigerated Segment



	Six Months Ended June 30,						Increase (Decrease)
	2015			2014			Amount			Percentage
	(Dollars and miles in thousands, except per tractor amounts)
Operating revenue	$	193,256		$	213,674		$	(20,418	)	(9.6	)%
Revenue xFSR	$	164,378		$	169,556		$	(5,178	)	(3.1	)%
Operating income	$	10,916		$	6,082		$	4,834		79.5	%
Operating Ratio	94.4		%	97.2		%				(2.8	)%
Adjusted Operating Ratio	93.4		%	96.4		%				(3.0	)%
Weekly Revenue xFSR per tractor	$	3,412		$	3,383		$	29		0.9	%
Total loaded miles	85,095			85,694			(599		)	(0.7	)%
Deadhead miles percentage	14.0		%	14.6		%				(0.6	)%
Average operational truck count:
Company	1,273			1,057			216			20.4	%
Owner-Operator	590			882			(292		)	(33.1	)%
Total	1,863			1,939			(76		)	(3.9	)%

Central Refrigerated Revenue — Operating revenue decreased for the six months ended June 30, 2015, as compared to the same period in 2014. Additionally, Revenue xFSR decreased by 3.1%, driven by a 2.4% reduction in Revenue xFSR per loaded mile and a 0.7% decrease in total loaded miles.

In January 2015, we ceased servicing a large Central Refrigerated specialty dedicated account. This dedicated account was not profitable and skewed our operational metrics since it operated with a much lower average length of haul, higher deadhead and much higher Revenue xFSR per loaded mile, as compared to other accounts.

Central Refrigerated Operating Income — Operating income increased 79.5% for the six months ended June 30, 2015, as compared to the same period in 2014. We ceased servicing the unprofitable specialty dedicated account, fuel prices declined and we benefited from other operational improvements, all of which more than offset the aforementioned increases in company driver wages and owner-operator contracted pay rates, as well as increased insurance and claims expense, generating a 300 basis-point improvement in Adjusted Operating Ratio.

Intermodal Segment



	Six Months Ended June 30,						Increase (Decrease)
	2015			2014			Amount			Percentage
	(Dollars in thousands)
Operating revenue	$	188,861		$	192,224		$	(3,363	)	(1.7	)%
Revenue xFSR	$	162,107		$	153,756		$	8,351		5.4	%
Operating income (loss)	$	358		$	(1,421	)	$	1,779		125.2	%
Operating Ratio	99.8		%	100.7		%				(0.9	)%
Adjusted Operating Ratio	99.8		%	100.9		%				(1.1	)%
Average operational truck count:
Company	501			394			107			27.2	%
Owner-Operator	91			71			20			28.2	%
Total	592			465			127			27.3	%
Load count	88,457			82,007			6,450			7.9	%
Average container count	9,150			8,717			433			5.0	%

Table of Contents Glossary of Terms

SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED) — CONTINUED

Intermodal Revenue — Although Intermodal operating revenue decreased for the six months ended June 30, 2015, as compared to the same period in 2014, Revenue xFSR increased by 5.4%. The following factors were contributors (offsets) to the increase in Revenue xFSR:

7.9% increase in load counts. COFC loads increased 15.3%, while TOFC loads decreased 58.7%, as we shifted away from the unprofitable refrigerated TOFC business in 2014.

(2.5)% decrease in Revenue xFSR per load, primarily due to the mix shift to COFC from TOFC.

Intermodal Operating Income (Loss) — Intermodal's operating results improved from an operating loss in the six months ended June 30, 2014 to operating income in the six months ended June 30, 2015. Adjusted Operating Ratio improved by 110 basis points, primarily due to a 9.8% increase in container turns, as well as improvements in dray efficiencies and safety trends. This was partially offset by the impact of the West Coast port issues, which resulted in an increased usage of lower-priced spot business off of the West Coast, in an effort to keep our container network balanced.

Non-reportable Segment



	Six Months Ended June 30,				Increase (Decrease)
	2015		2014		Amount			Percentage
	(In thousands)
Operating revenue	$	185,491	$	159,157	$	26,334		16.5	%
Operating income	$	92	$	1,386	$	(1,294	)	(93.4	)%

Non-reportable Segment Revenue — Operating revenue within our non-reportable segment increased for the six months ended June 30, 2015, as compared to the same period in 2014. This was primarily driven by growth in the logistics business and increased services to owner-operators.

Results of Operations — Consolidated Operating and Other Expenses

~~Salaries, Wages~~Operating Expenses —The following tables present certain operating expenses from our consolidated income statements, including each operating expense as a percentage of operating revenue and ~~Employee Benefits~~as a percentage of Revenue xFSR. Fuel surcharge revenue can be volatile and is primarily dependent upon the cost of fuel, rather than operational expenses unrelated to fuel. Therefore, we believe that Revenue xFSR is a better measure for analyzing our expenses and operating metrics.

Consolidated Expenses for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2015, Compared to the Three Months Ended June 30, 2014


	Three Months Ended March 31,						Three Months Ended June 30,						Increase (Decrease)
	2015			2014			2015			2014			Amount		Percentage
	(Dollars in thousands)						(Dollars in thousands)
Salaries, wages and employee benefits	$	261,654		$	229,366		$	276,326		$	238,093		$	38,233	16.1	%
% of operating revenue							26.1		%	22.1		%			4.0	%
% of Revenue xFSR	29.2		%	28.1		%	29.5		%	27.2		%			2.3	%
% of Operating revenue	25.8		%	22.7		%

~~Salaries, wages and employee benefits expense increased by $32.3 million, or 14.1%, for the three months ended March 31, 2015, as compared to the same period in 2014.~~ The increase was primarily due to ~~an 11.5%~~a 13.3% increase in total miles driven by company drivers ~~as well as~~and higher driver ~~pay rate increases. Specifically, on~~wages. We implemented increases in wages for our company drivers in August 4, 2014 ~~the Company implemented a significant increase in company~~and May 2015. These wage increases were tailored at improving driver ~~wages per mile to improve its recruitment~~retention and ~~retention of drivers.~~

~~Effective May 1, 2015, we enacted a material, targeted wage increase for company drivers.~~recruiting. The compensation paid to our company drivers and other employees may increase further in future periods as the economy strengthens and other employment alternatives become more available.

~~Operating Supplies~~



	Three Months Ended June 30,				Increase (Decrease)
	2015		2014		Amount		Percentage
	(Dollars in thousands)
Operating supplies and expenses	91,147		84,077		$	7,070	8.4	%
% of operating revenue	8.6	%	7.8	%			0.8	%
% of Revenue xFSR	9.7	%	9.6	%			0.1	%

The increase was primarily due to increased costs related to equipment maintenance.

Table of Contents Glossary of Terms

SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED) — CONTINUED



	Three Months Ended June 30,						Increase (Decrease)
	2015			2014			Amount			Percentage
	(Dollars in thousands)
Fuel expense	$	116,668		$	153,677		$	(37,009	)	(24.1	)%
% of operating revenue	11.0		%	14.3		%				(3.3	)%
% of Revenue xFSR	12.5		%	17.5		%				(5.0	)%

The decrease was the result of declining fuel prices and ~~Expenses~~improved fuel efficiency, partially offset by an increase in the number of miles driven by company drivers.

Three Months Ended March 31,
2015 2014
(Dollars in thousands)
Operating supplies and expenses $ 94,204
$ 80,825
% of Revenue xFSR 10.5 % 9.9 %
% of Operating revenue 9.3 % 8.0 %



	Three Months Ended June 30,						Increase (Decrease)
	2015			2014			Amount			Percentage
	(Dollars in thousands)
Purchased transportation expense	$	294,677		$	340,249		$	(45,572	)	(13.4	)%
% of operating revenue	27.8		%	31.6		%				(3.8	)%
% of Revenue xFSR	31.5		%	38.8		%				(7.3	)%

~~Operating supplies~~Purchased transportation expense includes payments made to owner-operators, rail partners and ~~expenses increased~~other third parties for their services. The decrease in the expense was primarily attributed to declining fuel prices, which reduced fuel reimbursements to our owner-operators and other third parties, as well as fewer miles driven by ~~$13.4 million, or 16.6%,~~our owner-operators. This was partially offset by an increase in owner-operator contracted pay rates, as well as growth in our logistics business.

We implemented increases in contracted pay rates for owner-operators in August 2014 and May 2015. These rate increases were tailored at improving driver retention and recruiting. Contracted pay rates for our owner-operators may increase further in future periods as the economy strengthens and other employment alternatives become more available.



	Three Months Ended June 30,						Increase (Decrease)
	2015			2014			Amount		Percentage
	(Dollars in thousands)
Insurance and claims	$	42,206		$	33,321		$	8,885	26.7	%
% of operating revenue	4.0		%	3.1		%			0.9	%
% of Revenue xFSR	4.5		%	3.8		%			0.7	%

The increase was due to adverse development of certain prior year claims and higher claims severity trends. Enhanced safety features of our new equipment, improved driver retention, and other safety initiatives are helping to reduce our current accident frequency and severity trends; however, we have not yet realized noticeable benefits from these initiatives, given the adverse development of certain prior year claims and the trend-dependent nature of actuarially derived claims accruals.



	Three Months Ended June 30,						Increase (Decrease)
	2015			2014			Amount		Percentage
	(Dollars in thousands)
Rental expense and depreciation and amortization of property and equipment	$	120,261		$	110,926		$	9,335	8.4	%
% of operating revenue	11.4		%	10.3		%			1.1	%
% of Revenue xFSR	12.8		%	12.7		%			0.1	%

We believe it is appropriate to combine our rental expense with our depreciation and amortization of property and equipment for analytical purposes because the mix of our leased versus owned tractors varies from period to period.

The increase in the combined expense was primarily due to growth in the number of tractors and trailers in our fleet. See consolidated table of revenue equipment below. Higher replacement costs of revenue equipment and an increase in the amount of leased equipment additionally contributed to the increase in the expense. As a percentage of Revenue xFSR, rental expense and depreciation and amortization of property and equipment remained consistent with the same period in 2014.

Table of Contents Glossary of Terms

SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED) — CONTINUED

Consolidated revenue equipment was comprised of the following:



	June 30, 2015	December 31, 2014	June 30, 2014
Tractors
Company:
Owned	6,753	6,083	5,618
Leased — capital leases	2,077	1,700	2,059
Leased — operating leases	6,897	6,099	5,880
Total company tractors	15,727	13,882	13,557
Owner-operator:
Financed through the Company	3,843	4,204	4,473
Other	1,097	750	567
Total owner-operator tractors	4,940	4,954	5,040
Total tractors	20,667	18,836	18,597
Trailers	63,142	61,652	57,462
Containers	9,150	9,150	8,717



	Three Months Ended June 30,						Increase (Decrease)
	2015			2014			Amount		Percentage
	(Dollars in thousands)
Gain on disposal of property and equipment	$	10,230		$	8,312		$	1,918	23.1	%
% of operating revenue	1.0		%	0.8		%			0.2	%
% of Revenue xFSR	1.1		%	0.9		%			0.2	%

We previously announced plans to accelerate the average trade-in cycle for our tractors. As we added newer tractors to our fleet in the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015, we sold the older models, which drove an increase in gain on disposal of property and equipment, as compared to the same period last year.

Other Expenses —The following table summarizes fluctuations in certain non-operating expenses, included in our consolidated income statements, for the three months ended June 30, 2015, as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2014.



	Three Months Ended June 30,				Increase (Decrease)
	2015		2014		Amount			Percentage
	(Dollars in thousands)
Interest expense	$	10,109	$	21,453	$	(11,344	)	(52.9	)%
Derivative interest expense	$	1,111	$	1,618	$	(507	)	(31.3	)%
Loss on debt extinguishment	$	—	$	6,990	$	(6,990	)	(100.0	)%
Legal settlement	$	6,000	$	—	$	6,000		n/a
Income tax expense	$	31,877	$	25,165	$	6,712		26.7	%

Interest Expense—Interest expense is comprised of debt interest expense and amortization of deferred financing costs and original issue discount. The decrease in interest expense was driven by our call of the Senior Notes in November 2014, lower debt balances, and more favorable interest rates and terms from the replacement of the 2013 Agreement with the 2014 Agreement.

Derivative Interest Expense — Derivative interest expense reflects losses reclassified from AOCI into net income from the effective portion of cash flow hedges, as well as the income effect of mark-to-market adjustments and current settlements of interest rate swaps, which were de-designated in February 2013.

Loss on Debt Extinguishment—The Company did not extinguish any debt during the three months ended June 30, 2015. The loss on debt extinguishment during the three months ended June 30, 2014 reflects the replacement of the 2013 Agreement with the 2014 Agreement, as well as repurchases of our Senior Notes.

Table of Contents Glossary of Terms

SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED) — CONTINUED

Legal Settlement—In June 2015, the Company settled a lawsuit relating to a contractual dispute with an ancillary fuel system equipment supplier. As a ~~percentage~~result of ~~Revenue xFSR, operating supplies~~this settlement, the Company incurred a $6.0 million expense. The settlement was fully paid subsequent to June 30, 2015.

Income Tax Expense— The effective tax rate for the three months ended June 30, 2015 and ~~expenses increased by 60 basis points.~~ 2014 was38.5%, as expected.

Consolidated Expenses for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2015, Compared to the Six Months Ended June 30, 2014



	Six Months Ended June 30,						Increase (Decrease)
	2015			2014			Amount		Percentage
	(Dollars in thousands)
Salaries, wages and employee benefits	$	537,980		$	467,459		$	70,521	15.1	%
% of operating revenue	25.9		%	22.4		%			3.5	%
% of Revenue xFSR	29.4		%	27.6		%			1.8	%

The increase was primarily due to a 12.4% increase in total miles driven by company drivers, as well as the company driver wage increases, ~~in recruiting and training expenses,~~discussed above.



	Six Months Ended June 30,						Increase (Decrease)
	2015			2014			Amount		Percentage
	(Dollars in thousands)
Operating supplies and expenses	$	185,351		$	164,902		$	20,449	12.4	%
% of operating revenue	8.9		%	7.9		%			1.0	%
% of Revenue xFSR	10.1		%	9.7		%			0.4	%

The increase was primarily due to increased costs related to equipment maintenance, ~~expenses~~driver recruiting, tolls, and ~~toll expenses.~~

legal and professional fees. We believe that the market for drivers has tightened. As a result, hiring expenses, including recruiting and advertising, which are included in operating supplies and expenses, have increased. We expect that these expenses will continue to increase from our focused efforts in attracting a sufficient amount of qualified drivers to operate our fleet.

~~Fuel Expense~~

Three Months Ended March 31,
2015 2014
(Dollars in thousands)
Fuel expense $ 106,907
$ 156,022
% of Operating revenue 10.5 % 15.5 %



	Six Months Ended June 30,						Increase (Decrease)
	2015			2014			Amount			Percentage
	(Dollars in thousands)
Fuel	$	223,575		$	309,699		$	(86,124	)	(27.8	)%
% of operating revenue	10.8		%	14.9		%				(4.1	)%
% of Revenue xFSR	12.2		%	18.3		%				(6.1	)%

~~Fuel expense was decreased by $49.1 million, or 31.5%, for the three months ended March 31, 2015, as compared to the same period in 2014.~~ The decrease was from a combination of declining fuel prices and improved fuel efficiency, partially offset by an increase in the number of miles driven by company drivers.

~~Purchased Transportation~~

Three Months Ended March 31,
2015 2014
(Dollars in thousands)
Purchased transportation expense $ 288,811
$ 319,169
% of Operating revenue 28.5 % 31.6 %



	Six Months Ended June 30,						Increase (Decrease)
	2015			2014			Amount			Percentage
	(Dollars in thousands)
Purchased transportation	$	583,488		$	659,418		$	(75,930	)	(11.5	)%
% of operating revenue	28.1		%	31.6		%				(3.5	)%
% of Revenue xFSR	31.9		%	38.9		%				(7.0	)%

Purchased transportation expense ~~which~~ includes payments made to owner-operators, rail partners and other third parties for their ~~services, decreased~~services. The decrease in the expense was primarily attributed to declining fuel prices, which reduced fuel reimbursements to our owner-operators and other third parties, as well as fewer miles driven by ~~$30.4 million, or 9.5%, for~~our owner-operators. This was partially offset by the ~~three months ended March 31, 2015,~~aforementioned increase in owner-operator contracted pay rates, as ~~compared to the same period~~well as growth in our logistics and intermodal businesses.

3440

Table of Contents Glossary of Terms

SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED) — CONTINUED

2014. The decrease was primarily attributed to declining fuel prices, which reduced fuel reimbursements to our owner-operators and other third parties, as well as fewer miles driven by our owner-operators. This was partially offset by an increase in owner-operator contracted pay rates and growth in our logistics and intermodal businesses.

Effective May 1, 2015, we enacted a material, targeted increase in contracted pay rates for our owner-operators. Contracted pay rates for our owner-operators may increase further in future periods as the economy strengthens and other employment alternatives become more available.

~~Insurance and Claims~~


	Three Months Ended March 31,						Six Months Ended June 30,						Increase (Decrease)
	2015			2014			2015			2014			Amount		Percentage
	(Dollars in thousands)						(Dollars in thousands)
Insurance and claims	$	44,307		$	42,448		$	86,513		$	75,769		$	10,744	14.2	%
% of operating revenue							4.2		%	3.6		%			0.6	%
% of Revenue xFSR	5.0		%	5.2		%	4.7		%	4.5		%			0.2	%
% of Operating revenue	4.4		%	4.2		%

Insurance and claims expense increased by $1.9 million, or 4.4%, for the three months ended March 31, 2015, as compared to the same period in 2014. As a percentage of Revenue xFSR, insurance and claims expense decreased by 20 basis points, but remained elevated,The increase was due to adverse development of certain prior year claims, higher claims severity trends and higher claims frequency trends related to severe weather conditions. Enhanced safety features of our new equipment, improved driver retention, and other safety initiatives are helping to reduce our current accident frequency and severity trends; however, we have not yet realized substantial benefits from these initiatives.

~~Rental Expense and Depreciation and Amortization of Property and Equipment~~

~~We believe it is appropriate to combine our rental expense with our~~



	Six Months Ended June 30,						Increase (Decrease)
	2015			2014			Amount		Percentage
	(Dollars in thousands)
Rental expense and depreciation and amortization of property and equipment	$	239,163		$	218,820		$	20,343	9.3	%
% of operating revenue	11.5		%	10.5		%			1.0	%
% of Revenue xFSR	13.1		%	12.9		%			0.2	%

The increase in the combined depreciation and amortization of property and equipment ~~for analytical purposes because the mix of our leased versus owned tractors varies from period to period.~~

Three Months Ended March 31,
2015 2014
(Dollars in thousands)
Rental expense $ 61,975
$ 51,719
Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment 56,927
56,175
Rental expense and depreciation and amortization of property and equipment $ 118,902
$ 107,894
% of Revenue xFSR 13.3 % 13.2 %
% of Operating revenue 11.7 % 10.7 %

~~Rental~~ expense ~~and depreciation and amortization of property and equipment increased by $11.0 million, or 10.2%, for the three months ended March 31, 2015, as compared to the same period in 2014. The increase~~ was primarily due to growth in the number of tractors and trailers in our ~~fleet, higher~~fleet. See consolidated table of revenue equipment above. Higher replacement costs of revenue equipment and an increase in the amount of leased ~~equipment.~~equipment additionally contributed to the increase in the expense. As a percentage of Revenue xFSR, rental expense and depreciation and amortization of property and equipment remained relatively consistent with the same period in 2014.



	Six Months Ended June 30,						Increase (Decrease)
	2015			2014			Amount		Percentage
	(Dollars in thousands)
Gain on disposal of property and equipment	$	14,162		$	11,471		$	2,691	23.5	%
% of operating revenue	0.7		%	0.6		%			0.1	%
% of Revenue xFSR	0.8		%	0.7		%			0.1	%

We previously announced plans to accelerate the average trade-in cycle for our tractors. As we added newer tractors to our fleet in the six months ended June 30, 2015, we sold the older models, which drove an increase in gain on disposal of property and equipment, as compared to the same period last year.

Other Expenses —The following table summarizes fluctuations in certain non-operating expenses, included in our consolidated income statements, for the six months ended June 30, 2015, as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2014.



	Six Months Ended June 30,				Increase (Decrease)
	2015		2014		Amount			Percentage
	(Dollars in thousands)
Interest expense	$	20,497	$	44,678	$	(24,181	)	(54.1	)%
Derivative interest expense	$	3,904	$	3,271	$	633		19.4	%
Loss on debt extinguishment	$	—	$	9,903	$	(9,903	)	(100.0	)%
Non-cash impairments of non-operating assets	$	1,480	$	—	$	1,480		n/a
Legal settlement	$	6,000	$	—	$	6,000		n/a
Income tax expense	$	55,568	$	32,869	$	22,699		69.1	%

Interest Expense— The decrease in interest expense was driven by our call of the Senior Notes in November 2014, lower debt balances and more favorable interest rates and terms from the replacement of the 2013 Agreement with the 2014 Agreement.

3541

Table of Contents Glossary of Terms

SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED) — CONTINUED

~~Consolidated revenue equipment was comprised of the following:~~

As of
March 31,
2015 December 31,
2014 March 31,
2014
Tractors:
Company:
Owned 6,476
6,083
6,464
Leased — capital leases 1,655
1,700
1,791
Leased — operating leases 6,549
6,099
5,017
Total company tractors 14,680
13,882
13,272
Owner-operator:
Financed through the Company 3,836
4,204
4,526
Other 1,019
750
572
Total owner-operator tractors 4,855
4,954
5,098
Total tractors 19,535
18,836
18,370
Trailers 61,780
61,652
58,074
Containers 9,150
9,150
8,717

~~Gain on Disposal of Property and Equipment~~

Three Months Ended March 31,
2015 2014
(In thousands)
Gain on disposal of property and equipment $ 3,932
$ 3,159

~~Gain on disposal of property and equipment increased by $0.8 million, or 24.5%, for the three months ended March 31, 2015, as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2014.~~

~~Interest Expense~~

Three Months Ended March 31,
2015 2014
(In thousands)
Interest expense $ 10,388
$ 23,225

Interest expense, which is comprised of debt interest expense and amortization of deferred financing costs and original issue discount, decreased by $12.8 million, or 55.3%, for the three months ended March 31, 2015, as compared to the same period in 2014. This was driven by the call of the Senior Notes in November 2014, lower debt balances, and more favorable interest rates and terms from the replacement of the 2013 Agreement with the 2014 Agreement.

Derivative Interest Expense

Three Months Ended March 31,
2015 2014
(In thousands)
Derivative interest expense $ 2,793
$ 1,653

— Derivative interest expense ~~for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014~~ reflects losses reclassified from AOCI into net income from the effective portion of cash flow hedges, as well as the income effect of mark-to-market adjustments and current settlements of interest rate swaps, which were de-designated in February 2013.

~~Table of ContentsGlossary of Terms~~

~~SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY~~

~~MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED) — CONTINUED~~

~~Loss on Debt Extinguishment~~

Three Months Ended March 31,
2015 2014
(In thousands)
Loss on debt extinguishment $ —
$ 2,913

For the three months ended March 31, 2015, the Company did not extinguish any debt. In March 2014, the Company used cash on hand to repurchase $23.8 million in principal of its Senior Notes, priced at 110.70%, in an open market transaction. Including principal, premium and accrued interest, the Company paid $27.1 million. The repurchase of the Senior Notes resulted in a loss on debt extinguishment of $2.9 million, representing the write-off of the unamortized original issue discount.

Non-cash Impairments of Non-operating Assets

Three Months Ended March 31,
2015 2014
(In thousands)
Non-cash impairments of non-operating assets $ 1,480
$ —

—In September 2013, the Company agreed to advance up to $2.3 million, pursuant to an unsecured promissory note, to an independent fleet contractor that transported freight on Swift's behalf. In March 2015, management became aware that the independent contractor violated various covenants outlined in the unsecured promissory note, which created an event of default that made the principal and accrued interest immediately due and payable. As a result of this event of default, as well as an overall decline in the independent contractor's financial condition, management re-evaluated the fair value of the unsecured promissory note. As of March 31, 2015, management determined that the remaining balance due from the independent contractor to the Company was not collectible, which resulted in a $1.5 million pre-tax adjustment that was recorded in "Non-cash impairments of non-operating assets" in the Company's consolidated income statements.

Loss on Debt Extinguishment — The Company did not extinguish any debt during the six months ended June 30, 2015. The loss on debt extinguishment during the six months ended June 30, 2014 reflects the replacement of the 2013 Agreement with the 2014 Agreement, as well as repurchases of our Senior Notes.

Legal Settlement—In June 2015, the Company settled a lawsuit relating to a contractual dispute with an ancillary fuel system equipment supplier. As a result of this settlement, the Company incurred a $6.0 million expense. The settlement was fully paid subsequent to June 30, 2015.

Income Tax Expense

Three Months Ended March 31,
2015 2014
(In thousands)
Income tax expense $ 23,691
$ 7,704

— The effective tax rate for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015 and ~~March 31,~~ 2014 was38.5%, as expected.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Sources of Liquidity

The following table presents our available sources of liquidity as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015 (in thousands):


Source	Amount		Amount
Cash and cash equivalents, excluding restricted cash	$	68,736	$	53,651
Availability under revolving line of credit due June 2019⁽¹⁾	349,703		349,703
Availability under 2013 RSA ⁽²⁾	40,400		67,200
Total unrestricted liquidity	$	458,839	$	470,554
Restricted cash⁽³⁾	61,692		64,309
Restricted investments, held to maturity, amortized cost ⁽³⁾	18,286		18,284
Total liquidity, including restricted cash and restricted investments	$	538,817	$	553,147

____________


(1)	As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015, we had no borrowings and $100.3 million in letters of credit, primarily related to workers' compensation and self-insurance liabilities, under our $450.0 million revolving credit facility, leaving $349.7 million available.


(2)	Based on eligible receivables at ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015, our borrowing base for the 2013 RSA was ~~$334.4~~$331.2 million, while outstanding borrowings were ~~$294.0~~$264.0 million.

~~Table of ContentsGlossary of Terms~~

~~SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY~~

~~MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED) — CONTINUED~~


(3)	Restricted cash and restricted short-term investments are primarily held by our captive insurance companies for claims payments.

Uses of Liquidity

Our business requires substantial amounts of cash for operating expenses, capital expenditures, other assets, working capital changes, principal and interest payments on our obligations, tax payments and letters of credit required for insurance.

When justified by customer demand, as well as our liquidity and our ability to generate acceptable returns, we make substantial capital expenditures to maintain a modern company tractor fleet, refresh our trailer fleet and fund growth in our revenue equipment fleet. We expect net cash capital expenditures of approximately ~~$305~~$350 million to ~~$330~~$375 million for 2015. Further, we expect to continue to obtain a portion of our equipment under operating and capital leases, which are not reflected as net cash capital expenditures. In addition, we believe we have ample flexibility with our trade cycle and purchase agreements to alter our current plans if economic or other conditions warrant. Beyond 2015, we expect our net capital expenditures to remain substantial.

Table of Contents Glossary of Terms

SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED) — CONTINUED

We believe we can finance our expected cash needs, including debt repayment, for at least the next twelve months with cash flows from operations, borrowings under our ~~revolving credit facility,~~Revolver, borrowings under our 2013 RSA, and lease financing. Over the long-term, we will continue to have significant capital requirements, which may require us to seek additional borrowings, lease financing or equity capital. The availability of financing or equity capital will depend upon our financial condition and results of operations as well as prevailing market conditions. If such additional borrowings, lease financing, or equity capital is not available at the time we need to access such funds, then we may be required to utilize the ~~revolving credit facility~~Revolver (if not then fully drawn), extend the maturity of then-outstanding indebtedness, rely on alternative financing arrangements, or engage in asset sales.

There can be no assurance that we will be able to incur additional debt under our existing financial arrangements to satisfy our ongoing capital requirements. However, we believe the combination of our expected cash flows, financing available through new equipment leases which are not subject to debt incurrence baskets, available funds under the 2013 RSA, and availability under our ~~revolving credit facility~~Revolver will be sufficient to fund our expected capital expenditures for at least the next twelve months.

Material Debt Agreements

As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015, we had $1.4 billion in material debt obligations at the following carrying values:

$~~494.4~~488.0 million: Term Loan A, due June 2019

$~~395.1~~394.2 million: Term Loan B, due June 2021, net of ~~$0.9~~$0.8 million OID

$~~294.0~~264.0 million: 2013 RSA outstanding borrowings

$~~199.7~~255.9 million: Capital lease obligations

$ ~~10.1~~7.6 million: Other

As of December 31, 2014, we had $1.5 billion in material debt obligations at the following carrying values:

$500.0 million: Term Loan A, due June 2019

$396.1 million: Term Loan B, due June 2021, net of $0.9 million OID

$334.0 million: 2013 RSA outstanding borrowings

$201.0 million: Capital lease obligations

$ 57.0 million: Revolver

$ 7.0 million: Other

Key terms and other details regarding our material debt agreements are discussed in Notes 5, 6, and 7 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Part I, Item 1: Financial Information, in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the ~~three months~~quarter ended ~~March 31, 2015.~~June 30, 2015, and is incorporated by reference herein.

Fourth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement

~~Table~~On July 27, 2015, the Company entered into the 2015 Agreement, which replaced the 2014 Agreement, including the $450.0 million Revolver, $500.0 million Term Loan A ($488.0 million outstanding as of ~~ContentsGlossary~~June 30, 2015) and $400.0 million Term Loan B ($394.2 million carrying value as of ~~Terms~~June 30, 2015). The 2015 Agreement includes a $600.0 million revolving credit facility ("new Revolver") and a $680.0 million first lien term loan A tranche ("new Term Loan A"). Upon closing, the proceeds from the new Term Loan A, a $200.0 million draw on the new Revolver and $3.0 million cash on hand were used to pay off the then-outstanding balances of the Term Loan A and Term Loan B under the 2014 Agreement, as well as certain transactional fees associated with the 2015 Agreement. This resulted in outstanding balances on the new Term Loan A and new Revolver of $680.0 million and $200.0 million, respectively. The pricing of the new Revolver and new Term Loan A is unchanged from the 2014 Agreement at 1.75% over LIBOR, subject to a leverage-based grid. This pricing is lower than the pricing of the Term Loan B and is expected to result in approximately $7.0 million in annualized savings, based on current borrowing levels. The new Revolver and new Term Loan A mature in July 2020 and are subject to the same financial covenants and substantially the same terms as those contained in the 2014 Agreement.

~~SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY~~

~~MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED) — CONTINUED~~

Cash Flows

The following table summarizes our cash flow activities for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015, as compared to the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2014.


	Three Months Ended March 31,									Six months ended June 30,
	2015			2014			2015 vs 2014			2015			2014			2015 vs 2014
	(In thousands)									(In thousands)
Net cash provided by operating activities	$	128,157		$	76,157		$	52,000		$	248,203		$	183,483		$	64,720
Net cash used in investing activities	(56,614		)	(25,203		)	(31,411		)	(136,186		)	(45,852		)	(90,334		)
Net cash used in financing activities	(107,939		)	(64,034		)	(43,905		)	(163,498		)	(123,281		)	(40,217		)

~~Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities~~ — Factors affecting the $52.0 million increase in net cash provided by operating activities for the three months ended March 31, 2015, as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2014, are depicted in the following cash flow waterfall analysis:

~~Favorable Variances:~~


~~(1)~~	$61.4 million increase in cash flows related to changes within accounts receivable. This increase in net cash provided by changes in accounts receivable was primarily related to the timing of collections during the three months ended March 31, 2015, as compared to the same period in 2014.


~~(2)~~	$28.8 million increase in operating income, driven by the factors discussed in "Results of Operations — Segment Review" and "Results of Operations — Consolidated Operating and Other Expenses," above.

~~Unfavorable Variances:~~


~~(3)~~	$33.8 million decrease in cash flows related to changes within accounts payable, accrued and other liabilities. This decrease in cash flows was primarily related to the timing of payments to vendors, claims payments and payments to owner-operators during the three months ended March 31, 2015, as compared to the same period in 2014.


~~(4)~~	~~The remaining $4.4 million decrease is related to various factors that had an immaterial impact on net cash provided by operating activities, individually and in aggregate.~~

3943

Table of Contents Glossary of Terms

SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED) — CONTINUED

Net Cash ~~Used in Investing~~Provided by Operating Activities — Factors affecting the ~~$31.4~~$64.7 million increase in net cash ~~used in investing~~provided by operating activities for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015, as compared to the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2014, are depicted in the following cash flow waterfall analysis:

Favorable ~~Variance:~~Variances:

(1)

$~~6.3~~67.1 million ~~decrease~~increase in cash flows related to changes within accounts receivable. This increase in net cash ~~used for investing~~provided by changes in ~~held-to-maturity securities. Proceeds from maturities~~accounts receivable was primarily related to the timing of ~~restricted investments increased by $4.7 million and purchases of investments decreased by $1.6 million for~~collections during the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015, as compared to the same period in 2014.

~~Unfavorable Variances:~~

(2)

$~~19.9~~33.3 million increase in ~~cash flows used~~operating income, driven by the factors discussed in investing activities related to the change in restricted cash balances. During the three months ended March 31, 2015, restricted cash increased by $16.1 million, primarily due to premiums paid to our captive insurance companies. During the three months ended March 31, 2014, the restricted cash balance decreased by $3.8 million."Results of Operations — Segment Review" and "Results of Operations — Consolidated Operating and Other Expenses," above.


(3)	~~$15.1 million decrease in proceeds from sale of property and equipment.~~


~~(4)~~	The remaining ~~$2.8~~$3.6 million ~~unfavorable variance~~increase is related to various factors that had an immaterial impact on net cash ~~used in investing~~provided by operating activities, individually and in aggregate.

Unfavorable Variance:


(4)	$39.3 million decrease in cash flows related to changes within accounts payable, accrued and other liabilities. This decrease in cash flows was primarily due to timing differences of $20.9 million in payments to vendors and $19.3 million in claims payments during the six months ended June 30, 2015, as compared to the same period in 2014.

Net Cash Used in ~~Financing~~Investing Activities — Factors affecting the ~~$43.9~~$90.3 million increase in net cash used in ~~financing~~investing activities for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015, as compared to the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2014, are depicted in the following cash flow waterfall analysis:

4044

Table of Contents Glossary of Terms

SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED) — CONTINUED

Favorable Variance:


(1)	The $7.2 million favorable variance is related to various factors that had an immaterial impact on net cash used in investing activities, individually and in aggregate.

Unfavorable Variances:


(2)	$31.6 million increase in cash flows used for capital expenditures. This is consistent with our expectations, as we previously announced plans to increase capital expenditures in order to support acceleration of the average trade-in cycle for our tractors and grow our fleet.


(3)	$30.4 million decrease in proceeds from sale of property and equipment.


(4)	$18.8 million increase in net expenditures on assets held for sale.


(5)	$16.7 million increase in restricted cash. Our captive insurance companies are required by insurance regulations to maintain cash balances to fund claims payments. The cash is restricted by insurance regulations. As such, fluctuations in the restricted cash balance are attributed to estimated claims payments.

Net Cash Used in Financing Activities — Factors affecting the $40.2 million increase in net cash used in financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2015, as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2014 are depicted in the following cash flow waterfall analysis, which excludes the cash flow impact of the 2014 Agreement (quantified below):

Cash Flow Impact of the 2014 Agreement: When we entered into the 2014 Agreement in June 2014, total proceeds received included $50.0 million at closing under the $500.0 million delayed draw first lien term loan A tranche and $400.0 million under the first lien term loan B tranche. Additionally, we borrowed $164.0 million under the Revolver. With these proceeds, we repaid the then-existing first lien term loan B-1 tranche and first lien term loan B-2 tranche under the 2013 Agreement with outstanding principal balances of $229.0 million and $370.9 million plus accrued interest, respectively, and paid $10.5 million in deferred financing fees at closing. We also borrowed $65.0 million under the 2013 RSA to repay a portion of the outstanding amount on the Revolver.

The following variance analysis excludes the impact of the aforementioned cash transactions from the 2014 Agreement.

Favorable Variances:

(1)

$~~27.2~~58.7 million decrease in net cash used for repayments of long-term debt and capital lease obligations. During the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015, ~~the Company~~we repaid ~~$19.3~~$48.8 million in long-term debt and capital lease obligations, including ~~$8.0~~$14.0 million in repayments that were primarily related to ~~its~~the Term Loan A and Term Loan B. ~~During~~Excluding the ~~three months ended March 31,~~impact of the 2014 ~~the Company~~Agreement, we repaid ~~$46.5~~$107.5 million in long-term debt and capital lease obligations ~~including a $23.8 million repurchase of its Senior Notes, $10.1 million repayment of its Term Loan B-1 of~~during the ~~2013 Agreement, and $2.4 million in repayments of other debt balances.~~six months ended June 20, 2014.


(2)	The remaining ~~$3.9~~$1.1 million favorable variance is related to ~~$4.5 million in proceeds received from long-term debt, partially offset by other~~ factors that had an immaterial impact on net cash used in financing activities, individually and in aggregate.

Table of Contents Glossary of Terms

SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED) — CONTINUED

Unfavorable Variances:


(3)	$40.0 million increase in net repayments on the revolving credit facility. During the three months ended March 31, 2015, the Company repaid $57.0 million on the revolving credit facility, as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2014, when the Company repaid $17.0 million on the revolving credit facility.


~~(4)~~	~~$35.0~~60.0 million increase in net repayments on the 2013 RSA. During the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015, ~~the Company~~we repaid ~~$50.0~~$70.0 million on the 2013 ~~RSA, which was partially offset by~~RSA. Excluding the impact of the 2014 Agreement, we repaid $10.0 million under the 2013 RSA during the six months ended June 30, 2014.


(4)	$40.0 million increase in ~~proceeds from advances.~~net repayments on the Revolver. During the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31, 2014, the Company~~June 30, 2015, we repaid ~~$5.0~~$57.0 million on the ~~2013 RSA.~~Revolver. Excluding the impact of the 2014 Agreement, we repaid $17.0 million under the Revolver during the six months ended June 20, 2014.

Working Capital

As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, we had a working capital surplus of ~~$291.5~~$317.1 million and $378.2 million, respectively.

Capital and Operating Leases

In addition to our net cash capital expenditures, we enter into lease agreements to acquire revenue equipment, including tractors and trailers. Our tractor and trailer lease acquisitions and terminations were as follows (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended March 31,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2015		2014		2015		2014
Gross value of revenue equipment acquired with:
Capital leases	$	9,988	$	—	$	85,821	$	38,043
Operating leases	38,661		85,808		112,864		219,375
Originating value of terminated revenue equipment leases:
Capital leases	$	—	$	30,558	8,542		45,772
Operating leases	7,979		46,160		150,183		49,856

Contractual Obligations

Refer to "Liquidity and Capital Resources," above, and "Off Balance Sheet Arrangements," below, for details on changes in our contractual obligations during the three and six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015. Aside from these items, there were no material changes to the contractual obligations table, which was included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014.

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

WeAs of June 30, 2015, we lease ~~10,385~~10,058 tractors under operating leases, which includes ~~6,549~~6,897 company tractors and ~~3,836~~3,161 owner-operator tractors financed by the Company. Operating leases have been an important source of financing for our revenue equipment. In accordance with ASC Topic 840, Leases, property and equipment held under operating leases are not reflected on our consolidated balance sheets. All expenses related to operating leases and related liabilities are reflected in our consolidated income statements under ~~“Rental~~"Rental expense.”" Rental expense was ~~$62.0~~$121.8 million for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015, compared with ~~$51.7~~$107.9 million in the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2014.

As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015, the Company had commitments outstanding to acquire revenue equipment for the remainder of 2015 for approximately ~~$705.5~~$437.2 million ($~~569.4~~341.4 million of which were tractor commitments) and in 2016 to 2017 for approximately $380.5 million (all of which were tractor commitments). The Company generally has the option to cancel tractor purchase orders with 60 to 90 ~~days~~days' notice prior to the scheduled production, although the notice period has lapsed for ~~approximately 31.3%~~36.1% of the tractor commitments outstanding as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015. These purchases are expected to be financed by the combination of operating leases, capital leases, debt, proceeds from sales of existing equipment and cash flows from operations.

~~Table of ContentsGlossary of Terms~~

~~SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY~~

~~MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED) — CONTINUED~~

Seasonality

Table of Contents Glossary of Terms

SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED) — CONTINUED

after the winter holiday season, the first quarter has historically been a lower volume quarter for us than the other three quarters. In recent years, the macro consumer buying patterns combined with shippers’ supply chain management, which historically contributed to the fourth quarter ~~“peak”~~"peak" season, continued to evolve. As a result, our fourth quarter 2014, 2013 and 2012 volumes were more evenly disbursed throughout the quarter rather than peaking early in the quarter. In the eastern and mid-western United States, and to a lesser extent in the western United States, during the winter season our equipment utilization typically declines and our operating expenses generally increase, with fuel efficiency declining because of engine idling and severe weather sometimes creating higher accident frequency, increased claims, and more equipment repairs. Our revenue may also be affected by holidays as a result of curtailed operations or vacation shutdowns, because our revenue is directly related to available working days of shippers. From time to time, we also suffer short-term impacts from severe weather and similar events, such as tornadoes, hurricanes, blizzards, ice storms, floods, fires, earthquakes, and explosions that could add volatility to, or harm, our results of operations.

Inflation

Inflation can have an impact on our operating costs. A prolonged period of inflation could cause interest rates, fuel, wages, and other costs to increase, which would adversely affect our results of operations unless freight rates correspondingly increase. However, the effect of inflation has been minor in recent years.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

See Note 2 under Part I, Item 1: Financial Statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for recently issued accounting pronouncements that could have an impact on our consolidated financial statements.

4247

Table of Contents Glossary of Terms

SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY



ITEM 3.	QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

We have interest rate exposure arising from our 2014 Agreement, 2013 RSA, and other financing agreements, which have variable interest rates. These variable interest rates are impacted by changes in short-term interest rates, although the volatility related to the ~~first lien term loan~~Term Loan B ~~tranche~~ is mitigated due to a minimum LIBOR ~~rate~~ of 0.75%. We manage interest rate exposure through a mix of variable- and fixed-rate debt (weighted average rate of 2.3% before applicable margin). Assuming the current level of borrowings, a hypothetical one-percentage point increase in interest rates would increase our annual interest expense by ~~$10.0~~$9.6 million, considering the effect of ~~the~~ minimum LIBOR ~~rate~~ on the ~~first lien term loan B tranche.~~Term Loan B.

We have commodity exposure with respect to fuel used in company tractors. Increases in fuel prices would continue to raise our operating costs, even after applying fuel surcharge revenue. Historically, we have been able to recover a majority of fuel price increases from our customers in the form of fuel surcharges. The weekly average diesel price per gallon in the United States, as reported by the DOE, decreased from an average of ~~$3.962~~$3.949 per gallon for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2014 to an average of ~~$2.916~~$2.883 per gallon for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015. We cannot predict the extent or speed of potential changes in fuel price levels in the future, the degree to which the lag effect of our fuel surcharge programs will impact us as a result of the timing and magnitude of such changes, or the extent to which effective fuel surcharges can be maintained and collected to offset such increases. We generally have not used derivative financial instruments to hedge our fuel price exposure in the past, but continue to evaluate this possibility.



ITEM 4.	CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures and determined that as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015 our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Change in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

4348

Table of Contents Glossary of Terms

SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY



PART II — OTHER INFORMATION



ITEM 1.	LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Information about our legal proceedings is included in Note 9 of the notes to our consolidated financial statements, included in Part I, Item 1, in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015 and is incorporated by reference herein.



ITEM 1A.	RISK FACTORS

In addition to the other information set forth in this report, the factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A, "Risk Factors" in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 should be carefully considered as these risk factors could materially affect our business, financial condition, future results and/or our ability to maintain compliance with our debt covenants. The risks described in our Annual Report are not the only risks facing us. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial may also adversely affect our business, financial condition, operating results and/or our ability to maintain compliance with our debt covenants.



ITEM 2.	UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

Not applicable.



ITEM 3.	DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

Not applicable.



ITEM 4.	MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.



ITEM 5.	OTHER INFORMATION

None.



ITEM 6.	EXHIBITS



Exhibit Number	Description	Page or Method of Filing

3.1	Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Swift Transportation Company	Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010

3.2	Bylaws of Swift Transportation Company	Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010

~~10.1~~	~~Second Amendment to Amended and Restated Receivables Purchase Agreement~~	~~Filed herewith~~

31.1	Certification by CEO pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002	Filed herewith

31.2	Certification by CFO pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002	Filed herewith

32.1	Certification by CEO and CFO pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002	Furnished herewith

101.INS	XBRL Instance Document	Filed herewith

101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document	Filed herewith

101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Calculation Linkbase Document	Filed herewith

101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Label Linkbase Document	Filed herewith

101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Presentation Linkbase Document	Filed herewith

101.DEF	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Document	Filed herewith

4449

Table of Contents Glossary of Terms

SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.




		SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY

Date:	~~May 6,~~August 5, 2015	/s/ Jerry Moyes
		Jerry Moyes
		Chief Executive Officer
		(Principal Executive Officer)


Date:	~~May 6,~~August 5, 2015	/s/ Virginia Henkels
		Virginia Henkels
		Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
		(Principal Financial Officer)

4550



	As of
	March 31, 2015	December 31, 2014	March 31, 2014
Tractors:
Company:
Owned	6,476	6,083	6,464
Leased — capital leases	1,655	1,700	1,791
Leased — operating leases	6,549	6,099	5,017
Total company tractors	14,680	13,882	13,272
Owner-operator:
Financed through the Company	3,836	4,204	4,526
Other	1,019	750	572
Total owner-operator tractors	4,855	4,954	5,098
Total tractors	19,535	18,836	18,370
Trailers	61,780	61,652	58,074
Containers	9,150	9,150	8,717

Large accelerated filer

Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer

o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Smaller reporting company