The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

BTCS Inc. and Subsidiaries

(Formerly Bitcoin Shop, Inc.)

Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows

(Unaudited)

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 1 - Business Organization and Nature of Operations

BTCS Inc. (formerly Bitcoin Shop, Inc.), a Nevada Corporation (the “Company”) in February 2014 entered the business of hosting an online ecommerce marketplace where consumers can purchase merchandise using digital currencies, including bitcoin and is building a diversified company with operations in the blockchain and digital currency ecosystems. In January 2015, the Company began a rebranding campaign using its BTCS.COM domain (shorthand for Blockchain Technology Consumer Solutions) to better reflect its broadened strategy. The Company released its new website which included broader information on its strategy, access to its ecommerce site, and launching an invite only beta version of its multi-sig secure storage solution (digital wallet). Although we continue to support and develop our ecommerce marketplace, we recentlywe’ve shifted a portion of our focus towards our transaction verification service business, also known as bitcoin mining. The Company has currently stopped the development of its digital wallet.

The Company was incorporated in the State of Nevada in 2008 under the name “Hotel Management Systems, Inc.”. On February 5, 2014, the Company entered into an Exchange Agreement with BitcoinShop.us, LLC, a Maryland limited liability company (“BCSLLC”), and the holders of the membership interests in BCSLLC (“Share Exchange”).BCSLLC. Upon closing of the Share Exchange, BCSLLC membersBitcoinshop Members transferred all the outstanding membership interests of BCSLLCBitcoinshop to the Company in exchange for an aggregate of 100,773,923 shares of the Company’s common stock (the “Common Stock”) (the “Reverse Merger”). As a result, BCSLLCBitcoinshop became a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. Immediately following the Share Exchange with BCSLLC,Bitcoinshop, the Company discontinued its business as manufacturer of touch screen and touch board products, interactive whiteboard displays and large touch-screens.

The Company is an early entrant in the blockchain and digital currency marketsmarket and one of the first U.S. publicly traded companies to be involved with digital currencies. The Company aims to enable users to engage in the digital currency ecosystem through one point of access - a universal digital currency platform. The Company plans to design and build this platform under the brand “Blockchain Technology Consumer Solutions,” or “BTCS.” The Company currently operates a beta ecommerce marketplace which already accepts a variety of digital currencies, has designed a beta secure digital currency storage solution BTCS Wallet, and has been expanding its transaction verification services business, recently adding servers capable of generating bitcoins (i.e. bitcoin mining). In the short term, the Company believes its transaction verification services business willmay be a growing source of revenue for it.

On July 28, 2015, the Company released a press release announcing the name change from Bitcoin Shop, Inc. to BTCS Inc.

On September 21, 2015, the Company, Spondoolies-Tech Ltd., an Israeli company (“Spondoolies”), and Shareholders of Spondoolies (the “Selling Shareholders”) entered into a Share Purchase Agreement, dated as of September 21, 2015, (the “Agreement”) pursuant to which the Company shall purchase all the shares in Spondoolies (the “Spondoolies Shares”) from the Selling Shareholders so that Spondoolies will be a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company after the closing of the transactions contemplated by the Agreement (the “Transaction”).

In exchange for the Spondoolies Shares, the Selling Shareholders will receive either shares of the Company’s common stock or shares of the Company’s Series A preferred stock, convertible into the Company’s common stock as described below (collectively, the “Company’s Securities”). After the completion of the Transaction, the Company’s shareholders will own a 54.4% to 55.4% stake in the combined company and Spondoolies’ shareholders will own a 44.6% to 45.6% of the combined company, based on the number of the Company’s securities outstanding immediately following the Transaction. The ownership range is a function of the Company’s liquidation preference associated with its existing $1.5 million investment in Spondoolies. The final ownership percentages will be determined prior to closing.

In addition to standard closing conditions, the closing of the Transactions will not occur until the Selling Shareholders receive rulings from the Israeli Tax Authority confirming, among other things, that the Selling Shareholders may defer the payment of applicable Israeli taxes with respect to the Company’s securities received by each Selling Shareholder until the Company’s securities are sold by the Selling Shareholder, and the approval of the transaction by the Israeli Office of Chief Scientist. The Company cannot predict the exact timing of the consummation of the merger and can provide no assurances that the merger will be consummated.

Note 2 - Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) for interim financial information, the instructions to Form 10-Q and the rules and regulations of the SEC. Accordingly, since they are interim statements, the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements do not include all of the information and notes required by GAAP for annual financial statements, but reflect all adjustments consisting of normal, recurring adjustments, that are necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods presented. In the opinion of the Company’s management, all adjustments, consisting of only normal and recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position and the results of operations for the periods presented have been included. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of results for a full year. The condensed consolidated financial statements and notes should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes for the year ended December 31, 2014.2015.

Note 3 - Liquidity, Financial Condition and Management’s Plans

The Company has commenced its planned operations but had limited operating activities to date. The Company has financed its operations from inception using proceeds received from capital contributions made by its membersFor the three months ended March 31, 2016 and proceeds in financing transactions. On January 19, 2015, the Company raised $433,000 of capital inrecognized a private placement transaction, $20,000 of capital through the issuance of a promissory note to Michal Handerhan, the Company’s Chief Operating Officer, and $45,000 of capital through the issuance of a promissory note to a third party. On April 20, 2015, the Company raised $2,312,500 of capital in a private placement transaction. Notwithstanding, the Company has limited revenues, limited capital resources and is subject to all of the risks and uncertainties that are typical of an early stage enterprise. Significant uncertainties include, among others, whether the Company will be able to raise the capital it needs to finance its longer term operations and whether such operations, if launched, will enable the Company to sustain operations as a profitable enterprise.

The Company used approximately $0.5 million of cash in its operating activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2015. The Company incurred an $8.4 million net loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2015.of $2.0 million and a net loss of $3.3 million, respectively. The Company had cash and cash equivalents of $0.09 millionapproximately $63,000 and a working capital deficiency of approximately $3.4$5.3 million at September 30, 2015.March 31, 2016, which includes $3.3 million for the fair value of derivative liabilities. The Company expects to incur losses into the foreseeable future as it undertakes its efforts to execute its business plans.

.

The Company will require significant additional capital to sustain its short-term operations and make the investments it needs to execute its longer term business plan. The Company’s existing liquidity is not sufficient to fund its operations and anticipated capital expenditures for the foreseeable future. If theThe Company attemptsis currently seeking to obtain additional debt or equity financing, it cannot providehowever there are currently no commitments in place for further financing nor is there any assurance that such financing will be available to the Company on favorable terms, if at all.

Because of recurring operating losses, net operating cash flow deficits, and an accumulated deficit, there is substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern. The Company has not made adjustments to the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements to reflect the potential effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or liabilities should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

The Company continues to incur ongoing administrative and other operating expenses, including public company expenses, in excess of corresponding (non-financing related) revenue.revenues. While the Company continues to implement its business strategy, it intends to finance its activities through:by:

Note 4 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

A summary of the significant accounting policies applied in the preparation of the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements is as follows:

Transaction Verification Services

Revenue earned from bitcoin processing activities (“Transaction Verification Services”), commonly termed ‘mining’ activities, is recognized at the fair value of the bitcoins received as consideration on the date of actual receipt.

The Company generates revenue by performing computer processing activities for bitcoin generation. In the digital-currency industry such activity is generally referred to as Transaction Verification Services or bitcoin mining. The Company receives consideration for performing such transaction verification activities in the form of bitcoins. Revenue is recorded upon the actual receipt of bitcoins.

Expenses consist of utilities paid to cover our electric costs, rent for our facility and personnel to run our facility. The expenses related to our Transaction Verification Services activities are affected by the level of activities and not the ultimate generation of bitcoins. The Company expenses these costs as they are incurred.

EarningsNet Loss per Share

Basic earningsloss per share (“EPS”) is computed by dividing net loss applicable to common stock by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period.

For purposes of calculating basic and diluted earnings per share, vested restricted stock awards are considered outstanding. Under the treasury stock method, diluted EPSloss per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other instruments that are convertible into common stock were exercised or could result in the issuance of common stock. As of September 30, 2015, the Company had 22,991,679 warrants outstanding, whichThe following financial instruments were not included in the diluted loss per share calculation for the three months and nine months ended September 30,March 31, 2016 and 2015 because their effect was anti-dilutive.anti-dilutive:

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In September 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”)January 2016, FASB issued ASU 2015-16, “Business Combinations: Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement-Period Adjustments” (ASU 2015-16)No. 2016-01,Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities. ASU 2015-16No. 2016-01 requires equity investments to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income; simplifies the impairment assessment of equity investments without readily determinable fair values by requiring a qualitative assessment to identify impairment; eliminates the requirement for an acquirerpublic business entities to retrospectively adjust its financial statements for changesdisclose the method(s) and significant assumptions used to provisional amountsestimate the fair value that are identified during the measurement-period following the consummation of a business combination. Instead, ASU 2015-16 requires these types of adjustmentsis required to be made duringdisclosed for financial instruments measured at amortized cost on the reporting periodbalance sheet; requires public business entities to use the exit price notion when measuring the fair value of financial instruments for disclosure purposes; requires an entity to present separately in which they are identified and would require additional disclosure or separate presentation ofother comprehensive income the portion of the adjustment that would have been recordedtotal change in the previously reported periods as iffair value of a liability resulting from a change in the adjustmentinstrument-specific credit risk when the entity has elected to measure the liability at fair value in accordance with the fair value option for financial instruments; requires separate presentation of financial assets and financial liabilities by measurement category and form of financial assets on the balance sheet or the accompanying notes to the provisional amounts had been recognized as offinancial statements and clarifies that an entity should evaluate the acquisition date.need for a valuation allowance on a deferred tax asset related to available-for-sale securities in combination with the entity’s other deferred tax assets. ASU 2015-16No. 2016-01 is effective prospectivelyfor financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, including2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2015-16 will have a material impact on its results of operations. 

In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-03,“Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs” (ASU 2015-03), which requires debt issuance costs to be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying value of the associated debt liability, consistent with the presentation of a debt discount. ASU 2015-03 is effective for the interim and annual periods ending after December 15, 2015, but early adoption is permitted. The Company has already adopted ASU 2015-03 and such adoption did not have any impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers: Topic 606” (ASU 2014-09), to supersede nearly all existing revenue recognition guidance under U.S. GAAP. The core principle of ASU 2014-09 is to recognize revenues, when promised goods or services are transferred to customers, in an amount that reflects the consideration that is expected to be received for those goods or services. ASU 2014-09 defines a five step process to achieve this core principle and, in doing so, it is possible more judgment and estimates may be required within the revenue recognition process than required under existing U.S. GAAP including identifying performance obligations in the contract, estimating the amount of variable consideration to include in the transaction price and allocating the transaction price to each separate performance obligation. ASU 2014-09 is effective the first quarter of 2018 using either of two methods: (i) retrospective to each prior reporting period presented with the option to elect certain practical expedients as defined within ASU 2014-09; or (ii) retrospective with the cumulative effect of initially applying ASU 2014-09 recognized at the date of initial application and providing certain additional disclosures as defined per ASU 2014-09. The Company is currently evaluating the impact ofthat ASU 2014-09No. 2016-01 will have on its condensed consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In February 2016, FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) which supersedes FASB ASC Topic 840, Leases (Topic 840) and provides principles for the recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of leases for both lessees and lessors. The new standard requires lessees to apply a dual approach, classifying leases as either finance or operating leases based on the principle of whether or not the lease is effectively a financed purchase by the lessee. This classification will determine whether lease expense is recognized based on an effective interest method or on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease, respectively. A lessee is also required to record a right-of-use asset and a lease liability for all leases with a term of greater than twelve months regardless of classification. Leases with a term of twelve months or less will be accounted for similar to existing guidance for operating leases. The standard is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted upon issuance. When adopted, the Company does not expect this guidance to have a material impact on its condensed consolidated financial statements.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-08, Revenuefrom Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent Considerations. The purpose of ASU No. 2016-08 is to clarify the implementation of guidance on principal versus agent considerations. For public entities, the amendments in ASU No. 2016-08 are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company is currently assessing the impact of ASU No. 2016-08 on its condensed consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09,Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718), Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting. Under ASU No. 2016-09, companies will no longer record excess tax benefits and certain tax deficiencies in additional paid-in capital (“APIC”). Instead, they will record all excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies as income tax expense or benefit in the income statement and the APIC pools will be eliminated. In addition, ASU No. 2016-09 eliminates the requirement that excess tax benefits be realized before companies can recognize them. ASU No. 2016-09 also requires companies to present excess tax benefits as an operating activity on the statement of cash flows rather than as a financing activity. Furthermore, ASU No. 2016-09 will increase the amount an employer can withhold to cover income taxes on awards and still qualify for the exception to liability classification for shares used to satisfy the employer’s statutory income tax withholding obligation. An employer with a statutory income tax withholding obligation will now be allowed to withhold shares with a fair value up to the amount of taxes owed using the maximum statutory tax rate in the employee’s applicable jurisdiction(s). ASU No. 2016-09 requires a company to classify the cash paid to a tax authority when shares are withheld to satisfy its statutory income tax withholding obligation as a financing activity on the statement of cash flows. Under current U.S. GAAP, it was not specified how these cash flows should be classified. In addition, companies will now have to elect whether to account for forfeitures on share-based payments by (1) recognizing forfeitures of awards as they occur or (2) estimating the number of awards expected to be forfeited and adjusting the estimate when it is likely to change, as is currently required. The amendments of this ASU are effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, with early adoption permitted but all of the guidance must be adopted in the same period. The Company is currently assessing the impact that ASU No. 2016-09 will have on its condensed consolidated financial statements.

In April 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-10, Revenue from Contracts with Customer. The new guidance is an update to ASC 606 and provides clarity on: identifying performance obligations and licensing implementation. For public companies, ASU No. 2016-10 is effective for annual periods, including interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2016. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that ASU No. 2016-10 will have on its condensed consolidated financial statements.

Subsequent events

Subsequent events have been evaluated through the date of this filing.

Note 5 - Property and Equipment

Property and equipment consist of the following at September 30, 2015March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2014:2015:

During the quarter ended September 30, 2015, the Company incurred $151,712 leasehold improvement cost for the facilities in North Carolina. The lease commenced on January 28, 2015. The cost of leasehold improvement and office equipment are recorded at cost and depreciated using the straight-line method over the lease period of 2 years.

Depreciation expense was $88,161approximately $95,000 and $2,011$47,000 for the three months ended September 30,March 31, 2016 and 2015, and 2014, respectively, and $201,905 and $2,967 for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

Note 6 - Shareholders’ Equity

Common Stock– Investment at Cost

First Quarter 2015Spondoolies

On January 19, 2015 (the “Closing Date”), theThe Company sold an aggregatehad total investment of 4,330,000 units (each a “January Unit”) in a private placement (the “January Private Placement”) of its securities$2,250,000 to certain investors at a purchase price of $0.10 per January Unit pursuant to subscription agreements for an aggregate purchase price of $433,000. Each January Unit in the January Private Placement consists of (i) one share of Common Stock and (ii) a warrant to purchase 2.5 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $0.10 per share (“January Warrant”). The January Units are subject to a “Most Favored Nations” provision and the January Warrants are subject to price protection in the event of lower priced issuances for a period of twenty four months from the Closing Date in the event the Company issues Common Stock or securities convertible into or exercisable for shares of Common Stock at a price per share or conversion or exercise price per share which shall be less than $0.10 per share, subject to certain customary exceptions. Additionally, the shares of Common Stock issued as part of the January Unit and issuable upon exercise of the January Warrants are subject to demand and piggy back registration rights. The January Warrant may be exercised on a cashless basis in the event there is no effective registration statement covering the resale of the Common Stock issuable upon exercise of the January Warrants. The January Warrants may be called for cancelation by the Company if: (i) the price per share exceeds $0.20 for 15 consecutive trading days, and (ii) the average daily dollar trading volume for such 15 consecutive trading days exceeds $50,000 per trading day. Because of the “Most Favored Nations” and call provision discussed above, the net value to shareholders’ equity is 0. The fair value of all components of the January Units was $952,600 ($649,500 attributed to the unit warrants, and $303,100 attributed to the derivative liability component with “Most Favored Nations” Provision), and as such the Company recorded a loss on issuance of January Unit of $519,600 for the three month ended March 31, 2015. (see Note 9 for assumptions)

On January 23, 2015, the Company purchased 100 Spondoolies S35 digital currency mining servers from Spondoolies Tech Ltd. (“Spondoolies”) for $223,500 (the “Purchase Price”) pursuant to a purchase order agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”). $25,000as of the total Purchase Price was paid in the form of 250,000 shares of the Company’s common Stock.

On January 26, 2015, the Company entered into a Share Redemption Agreement and Release (the “Redemption Agreement”) with Charles Kiser, its Executive Vice President pursuant to which Mr. Kiser agreed to return an aggregate of 250,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock, held by him to the Company for cancellation in consideration for an aggregate payment of $2,500.

On February 20, 2015, the Company issued 55,693 shares of Common Stock at a price of $0.26 to purchase hardware from a seller for $14,480.

On March 26, 2015 the Company acquired 166,756 shares (an additional 2% equity ownership) of Coin Outlet from Eric Grill, Coin Outlet’s CEO, for 701,966 shares of the Company’s Common Stock. The Company now owns approximately 4.2% of Coin Outlet’s equity and has the ability to own up to 11% upon exercise of the Company’s previously issued option and warrant. Mr. Grill entered into a lock-up agreement with the Company with respect to his shares, pursuant to the lockup agreement Mr. Grill is prohibited from the sale of any his shares until after February 5, 2017. December 31, 2015.The Company assessed impairment for the Coin OutletSpondoolies investment and determined that this investment is not recoverable and as such fully impaired it due to the steady price decline in Bitcoins throughout 2015. The Bitcoin Price Index was $319.70 and $243.39 as of December 31, 2014 and March 31, 2015, respectively. Total impairment was $154,433 for Coin Outlet.temporary liquidator appointed by the Court on May 4, 2016 (see FN 10).

During the quarter ended March 31, 2015, a preferred stockholder converted 2,200,000 shares of Series C Preferred Stock to 2,200,000 shares of Common Stock. This conversion was in accordance with the original terms of the Series C Preferred Stock agreement.

During the quarter ended March 31, 2015, the Company converted accounts payable due to certain vendors of $143,694 into 552,669 shares of Common Stock. In addition to common shares issued, the Company also granted “Conversion Price Protection” to each vendor. For one year after the date of conversion if the Company issues any equity or an equity-linked security at a price less than $0.26 per common share it will result in the issuance of additional Common Stock in an amount equal to an amount such that total number of shares issued to the vendors will be equal to the number of shares that would have been issued had the accounts payable been converted at the subsequent lower offering price. The fair value of the Common Stock on each of the issuance date with “Conversion Price Protection” was $202,074. The Company recorded $58,380 of inducement expense associated with the issuance of the common shares (based upon a monte-carlo simulation). A summary of quantitative information with respect to valuation methodology for the three months ended March 31, 2015 is as follows:

Second Quarter 2015

On April 20, 2015 (the “Closing Date”), the Company sold an aggregate of 7,708,342 units (each a “April Unit”) in a private placement (the “April Private Placement”) of its securities to certain investors at a purchase price of $0.30 per January Unit pursuant to subscription agreements for an aggregate purchase price of $2,312,500. Each April Unit in the April Private Placement consists of (i) one share of Common Stock and (ii) a warrant to purchase 1.4 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $0.375 per share (“April Warrant”). Charles Allen, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Michal Handerhan, the Company’s Chief Operating Officer each purchased 66,667 April Units for $20,000 per executive in the April Private Placement. The April Units are subject to a “Most Favored Nations” provision and the April Warrants are subject to price protection in the event of lower priced issuances for a period of twenty four months from the Closing Date in the event the Company issues Common Stock or securities convertible into or exercisable for shares of Common Stock at a price per share or conversion or exercise price per share which shall be less than $0.30 per share, subject to certain customary exceptions. Additionally, the shares of Common Stock issued as part of the April Unit and issuable upon exercise of the April Warrants are subject to demand and piggy back registration rights. The April Warrant may be exercised on a cashless basis in the event there is no effective registration statement covering the resale of the Common Stock issuable upon exercise of the April Warrants. The April Warrants may be called for cancelation by the Company if: (i) the price per share exceeds $0.938 for 15 consecutive trading days, and (ii) the average daily dollar trading volume for such 15 consecutive trading days exceeds $200,000 per trading day. Because of the “Most Favored Nations” and call provision discussed above, the net value to shareholders’ equity is 0. The fair value of all components of the April Units was $2,843,811 ($1,878,957 attributed to the unit warrants, and $964,854 attributed to the derivative liability component with “Most Favored Nations” Provision), and as such2016, the Company recorded aimpairment loss on issuance of April Unit of $531,311 on the issuance date. (see Note 9 for assumptions)$2,250,000.

On April 20, 2015, the Company issued an aggregate of 418,716 shares of Common Stock to its advisory board members. Each of the nine members of the advisory board received 46,524 shares of common stock. The fair value of the Common stock on the issuance date was $102,585.

On May 12, 2015, the Company agreed to convert accrued and unpaid salaries owed to Charles Allen, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, and Michal Handerhan, the Company’s Chief Operating Officer (collectively the “Employees”) into shares of Common Stock pursuant to conversion agreements (collectively, the “Salary Conversion Agreements”). The Company recorded $25,000 accrued salaries as of March 31, 2015. Charles Allen converted $25,000 of accrued and unpaid salary for the months of March 2015 and April 2015 into 50,000 shares of Common Stock at a per share price of $0.50. Michal Handerhan converted $25,000 of accrued and unpaid salary for the months of March 2015 and April 2015 into 50,000 shares of Common Stock at a per share price of $0.50.

During the quarter ended June 30, 2015, the Company issued a total 171,387 shares of Common Stock at a per share price of $0.31 to certain vendors. The shares were issued pursuant to a conversion agreement for an aggregate conversion amount of $53,230. The conversion amount was in consideration for advisory services.

On June 16, 2015, the Company issued 45,500 shares of Common Stock to a vendor for construction works provided in our North Carolina facility. The fair value of the Common Stock on the issuance date was $9,146, and was capitalized as leasehold improvement.

Third Quarter 2015

During the quarter ended September 30, 2015, the Company issued 477,000 shares of Common Stock to various independent contractors for services provided at its facility in North Carolina and investor relations services. The weighted average fair value of the common stock on the issuance date was $0.18 per share. The Company recorded expenses of $87,270 for the three months ended September 30, 2015.

Stock Purchase Warrants

The following is a summary of warrant activity for the nine months ended September 30, 2015:

*The warrants contain most favor nation and call provision and the Company classifies these warrant instruments as liabilities measured at fair value and re-measures these instruments at fair value each reporting period. (See FN 9)

Demand Registration Rights.

The shares of Common Stock issued upon conversion of Series C Shares or the warrant underlying the January Units are subject to “piggy-back” and “demand” registration rights until such shares of Common Stock may be sold under Rule 144 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”). The Company shall pay to holders a fee of 0.25% per month of the investors’ investment, payable in cash, for every thirty (30) day period up to a maximum of 3%, (i) following the filing date that the registration statement has not been filed and (ii) following the effectiveness date that the registration statement has not been declared effective; provided, however, that the Company shall not be obligated to pay any such liquidated damages if the Company is unable to fulfill its registration obligations as a result of rules, regulations, positions or releases issued or actions taken by the Commission pursuant to its authority with respect to “Rule 415”, and the Company registers at such time the maximum number of shares of Common Stock permissible upon consultation with the staff of the Commission. If during the effectiveness period, the number of registerable Securities at any time exceeds 100% of the number of shares of Common Stock then registered in a registration statement, the Company shall file as soon as reasonably practicable an additional registration statement covering the resale of not less than the number of such registerable securities.

The Company accounts for obligations under the Registration Rights Agreement in accordance with ASC 450 “Contingencies,” which requires us to record a liability if the contingent loss is probable and the amount can be estimated. At September 30, 2015, the Company has not recorded a liability pertaining to the Company’s obligations under the Registration Rights Agreement because the amount is not deemed probable.

Note 7 - Related Party Transactions

On December 18, 2014, Charles Allen, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer contributed $7,990 of brand new digital currency mining hardware at cost in exchange for a promissory note (the “Allen Note”). The Allen Note bears interest at a rate of 2% per year and is due on December 31, 2015. The Allen Note may be prepaid, at our option, without premium or penalty, in whole or in part at any time or from time to time prior to the Allen Note maturity. On February 10, 2015, the Company paid back $3,000 on the Allen Note. On May 8, 2015, the Company paid in full the remaining balance of the promissory note issued to Charles Allen, including $4,990 in principal and $48 in accrued interest.

On January 19, 2015, Michal Handerhan, the Company’s Chief Operating Officer loaned the Company $20,000 pursuant to Promissory Notes (the “Handerhan Note”). The Handerhan Note bears interest at the rate of 2% per annum and matures on December 31, 2015. The Handerhan Note may be prepaid, at the option of the Company, without premium or penalty, in whole or in part at any time or from time to time prior to the Handerhan Note maturity. On February 17, 2015, the Company paid back $3,000. On May 4, 2015, the Company repaid $10,000 in principal of the promissory note issued to Michal Handerhan. On May 13, 2015, the Company paid in full the remaining balance of the promissory note issued to Michal Handerhan, including $7,000 in principal and $108 in accrued interest.

On January 19, 2015 (the “Closing Date”), the Company sold an aggregate of 4,330,000 units (each a “January Unit”) in a private placement (the “January Private Placement”) of its securities to certain investors at a purchase price of $0.10 per January Unit pursuant to subscription agreements for an aggregate purchase price of $433,000. Charles Allen, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, and Michal Handerhan, the Company’s Chief Operating Officer, each purchased 50,000 January Units in the January Private Placement for $5,000 per executive.

On April 20, 2015 (the “Closing Date”), the Company sold an aggregate of 7,708,342 units (each a “April Unit”) in a private placement (the “April Private Placement”) of its securities to certain investors at a purchase price of $0.30 per April Unit pursuant to subscription agreements for an aggregate purchase price of $2,312,500. Charles Allen, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Michal Handerhan, the Company’s Chief Operating Officer each purchased 66,667 April Units for $20,000 per executive in the April Private Placement.

Note 8 - Investment at Cost

Coin Outlet

On January 19, 2015, the Company entered into a Convertible Note Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with Coin Outlet, Inc. (“Coin Outlet”) pursuant to which the Company purchased a convertible promissory note in the principal amount of $100,000 (the “Coin Outlet Note”). The Coin Outlet Note accrues interest at 4% per annum and matures on January 31, 2016. The Coin Outlet Note will convert, on or before the maturity date, upon the occurrence of Coin Outlet’s next equity financing (or series of financings) in which Coin Outlet receives gross proceeds of at least $1 million (the “Trigger Financing”). Upon the occurrence of a Trigger Financing, all outstanding principal on the Coin Outlet Note (and, at the Coin Outlet’s option, accrued but unpaid interest thereon), will convert into such Coin Outlet securities sold in the Trigger Financing at a price per share equal to 80% of the per share price of the securities sold in the Trigger Financing (the “Note Conversion Price”). In the event the Note Conversion Price exceeds the quotient of (x) $6 million divided by (y) Coin Outlet’s fully diluted capitalization (as calculated in the Coin Outlet Note) (such quotient, the “Fully Diluted Value”), then the Note Conversion Price shall equal the per share price of the securities sold in the Trigger Financing and Coin Outlet shall issue such additional number of shares of Coin Outlet to the Company such that the average purchase price per share of Coin Outlet common stock (including shares of Coin Outlet common stock issuable upon conversion of the Coin Outlet Note into the Trigger Financing) is equal to the Fully Diluted Value.

On March 26, 2015 the Company acquired 166,756 shares (an additional 2% equity ownership) of Coin Outlet Inc. (“Coin Outlet”) from Eric Grill, Coin Outlet’s CEO, for 701,966 shares of the Company’s Common Stock (“Coin Outlet Investment”). The Company now owns approximately 4.2% of Coin Outlet’s equity and has the ability to own up to 11% upon exercise of its previously issued option and warrant. Mr. Grill entered into a lock-up agreement with the Company with respect to his shares, pursuant to the lockup agreement Mr. Grill is prohibited from the sale of any his shares until after February 5, 2017. (see Note 6)

As of March 31, 2015, the Company assessed the carrying amount of this investment for potential impairment and determined that this investment is not recoverable due to uncertainties regarding the stability of digital currency markets and steady price decline in the US dollar equivalent of Bitcoins throughout 2015. The Bitcoin Price Index was $319.70 and $243.39 as of December 31, 2014 and March 31, 2015, respectively. Total impairment was $254,433 for the Coin Outlet Note and Coin Outlet Investment. The fair value of investment was measured under Level 3 on a non-recurring basis.

Spondoolies

On May 12, 2015, the Company entered into a Series B Preferred Share Purchase Agreement (the “Share Purchase Agreement”) and the Management Rights Letter (the “Rights Letter”) with Spondoolies Tech Ltd. (“Spondoolies”) a Bitcoin equipment manufacturer, by way of a joinder agreement (the “Joinder Agreement”) pursuant to which the Company purchased 29,092 Series B Preferred Shares of Spondoolies (the “Series B Shares”) for an aggregate purchase price of $1,500,000 (the “Investment”). After giving effect to the Investment, the Company owns approximately 6.6% of Spondoolies’ equity on a fully diluted basis. The Series B Preferred Shares are convertible into Spondoolies’ ordinary shares by dividing the original issuance price of the Series B Preferred Shares ($51.56) by the initial conversion price ($51.56) (the “Conversion Price”). Until Spondoolies consummates a “Qualified IPO” (as defined substantially as an initial firm commitment underwritten public offering of Spondoolies’ ordinary shares with net proceeds to Spondoolies of not less than $40 million), the Series B Preferred shares are subject to anti-dilution protection in the event Spondoolies issues ordinary shares or securities convertible into or exercisable for ordinary shares at a price per share or conversion or exercise price per share which shall be less than Conversion Price then in effect, subject to certain customary exceptions. The Conversion Price is subject to adjustment in the event of stock splits, stock dividends, combination of shares and similar recapitalization transactions. The Series B Shares are also entitled to certain preemptive rights, and a liquidation preference in the event of dissolution of Spondoolies. The Series B Preferred Shares are automatically convertible into ordinary shares of Spondoolies upon the occurrence of a Qualified IPO. In connection with the Company’s purchase of the Series B Preferred Shares, the Company and Spondoolies executed the Rights Letter which provided the Company with certain rights, including inspection rights, and information rights with respect to Spondoolies financial statements, appurtenant to the Investment.

On May 12, 2015, the Company and Spondoolies entered into a letter agreement (the “Letter Agreement”) to clarify and expand upon certain terms related to a proposed merger (“Proposed Merger”) contained in the LOI. Under the terms of the Letter Agreement, Spondoolies agreed to provide to the Company: (i) certain exclusivity rights for a period of nine months (the “Term”) with respect to any proposals or offers from, or enter into any agreements with, any third party relating to (a) any investment in, or acquisition of, equity interests of Spondoolies or (b) any possible sale or other disposition of all or any material portion of assets of Spondoolies; (ii) a breakup fee of $50,000 payable by Spondoolies, if the Proposed Merger is not consummated during the Term as a result of certain circumstances; (iii) a breakup fee of $1,000,000 if the Proposed Merger is not consummated because the approval of Spondoolies’ board of directors or shareholders for the Proposed Merger is not obtained and a competing deal is consummated, during the Term; and (iv) Spondoolies agreed to continue to sell its products to the Company for a period of 3 years, if the Proposed Merger is not consummated and Spondoolies continues to design and manufacture ASIC digital currency mining hardware.

On September 21, 2015, the Company, Spondoolies-Tech Ltd., an Israeli company (“Spondoolies”), and Shareholders of Spondoolies (the “Selling Shareholders”) entered into a Share Purchase Agreement, dated as of September 21, 2015, (the “Agreement”) pursuant to which the Company shall purchase all the shares in Spondoolies (the “Spondoolies Shares”) from the Selling Shareholders so that Spondoolies will be a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company after the closing of the transactions contemplated by the Agreement (the “Transaction”).

In exchange for the Spondoolies Shares, the Selling Shareholders will receive either shares of the Company’s common stock or shares of the Company’s Series A preferred stock, convertible into the Company’s common stock as described below (collectively, the “Company’s Securities”). After the completion of the Transaction, the Company’s shareholders will own a 54.4% to 55.4% stake in the combined company and Spondoolies’ shareholders will own a 44.6% to 45.6% of the combined company, based on the number of the Company’s securities outstanding immediately following the Transaction. The ownership range is a function of the Company’s liquidation preference associated with its existing $1.5 million investment in Spondoolies. The final ownership percentages will be determined prior to closing.

In addition to standard closing conditions, the closing of the Transactions will not occur until the Selling Shareholders receive rulings from the Israeli Tax Authority confirming, among other things, that the Selling Shareholders may defer the payment of applicable Israeli taxes with respect to the Company’s securities received by each Selling Shareholder until the Company’s securities are sold by the Selling Shareholder, and the approval of the transaction by the Israeli Office of Chief Scientist. The Company cannot predict the exact timing of the consummation of the merger and can provide no assurances that the merger will be consummated.

Note 97 - Fair Value Measurements

The Company’s assets and liabilities recorded at fair value have been categorized based upon a fair value hierarchy.

The following table presents information about the Company’s liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis and the Company’s estimated level within the fair value hierarchy of those assets and liabilities as of September 30, 2015March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2014:2015:

Derivative liabilities as of September 30, 2015 consists of Unit warrants with most favored nation clauses that were issued on January 19, 2015 and April 20, 2015 in connection with the Company’s financing.

There were no transfers between Level 1, 2 or 3 during the ninethree months ended September 30, 2015.March 31, 2016.

The following table presents additional information about Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at fair value. Both observable and unobservable inputs may be used to determine the fair value of positions that the Company has classified within the Level 3 category. As a result, the unrealized gains and losses for assets and liabilities within the Level 3 category may include changes in fair value that were attributable to both observable (e.g., changes in market interest rates) and unobservable (e.g., changes in unobservable long-dated volatilities) inputs.

Changes in Level 3 liabilities measured at fair value for the ninethree months ended September 30, 2015:March 31, 2016:

The amount of total gains or losses for the period included in changes in fair values attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to liability still held as of March 31, 2016 were approximately $497,000 and $927,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

The Company’s derivative liabilities are measured at fair value using the Monte Carlo simulation valuation methodology. A summary of quantitative information with respect to valuation methodology, estimated using a probability-weighted Black-Scholes option pricing model, which is comparable to a Binomial option pricing model, andthe weighted average (in aggregate) significant unobservable inputs (Level 3 inputs) used forin measuring the Company’s warrantderivative liabilities that are categorized within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy for the ninethree months ended September 30, 2015March 31, 2016 is as follows:

Derivative Liabilities

Senior Convertible Notes at Fair Value

The development and determination of the unobservable inputs for Level 3 fair value measurements and fair value calculations are the responsibility of the Company’s management.Management.

Note 8 - Stock Based Compensation

Compensation expense for all stock-based awards is measured on the grant date based on the fair value of the award and is recognized as an expense, on a straight-line basis, over the employee’s requisite service period (generally the vesting period of the equity award). The fair value of each option award is estimated on the grant date using a Black-Scholes option valuation model. Stock-based compensation expense is recognized only for those awards that are expected to vest using an estimated forfeiture rate. The Company estimates pre-vesting option forfeitures at the time of grant and reflects the impact of estimated pre-vesting option forfeitures in compensation expense recognized. For options and warrants issued to non-employees, the Company recognizes stock compensation costs utilizing the fair value methodology over the related period of benefit.

Stock-based compensation expense was $0 and $1.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Stock Options

There are no stock options outstanding as of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015.

Note 109 - Stock Based Compensation

Compensation expense for all stock-based awards is measured on the grant date based on the fair value of the award and is recognized as an expense, on a straight-line basis, over the employee’s requisite service period (generally the vesting period of the equity award). The fair value of each option award is estimated on the grant date using a Black-Scholes option valuation model. Stock-based compensation expense is recognized only for those awards that are expected to vest using an estimated forfeiture rate. The Company estimates pre-vesting option forfeitures at the time of grant and reflects the impact of estimated pre-vesting option forfeitures in compensation expense recognized. For options and warrants issued to non-employees, the Company recognizes stock compensation costs utilizing the fair value methodology over the related period of benefit.

Stock-based compensation expense was $3,629,804 and $2,247,800 for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Stock-based compensation expense was $6,383,772 and $5,814,963 for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

Stock Option ActivityRelated Party Transactions

On July 2, 2015,February 19, 2016, the Company entered into Option Cancellation and Release Agreementsa securities escrow agreement (the “Securities Escrow Agreement”) with each of Charles Allen its Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chairman, and Michal Handerhan, its Chief Operating Officer and corporate secretary (collectively, the “Company Option Holders”“Principal Stockholders”) pursuant. Pursuant to which the Company Option HoldersSecurities Escrow Agreement and for the benefit of the Company’s public shareholders the Principal Stockholders voluntarily agreed to place stock certificates representing 24,000,000 shares of Common Stock (the “Escrow Shares”) into escrow.

The return optionsof 12,000,000 escrowed shares (the “Listing Escrow Shares”) to purchase up to 12,450,000 shares in the aggregatePrincipal Stockholders shall be based upon the successful listing of the Company’s Common Stock par value $0.001 per share, with an exercise priceon a National Stock Exchange on or before December 31, 2016 (the “Listing Condition”). The Listing Escrow Shares will be returned to the Company for cancelation for no consideration if the Company fails to achieve the Listing Condition. The return of $0.10. The Company Option Holders canceled their options without replacement, and12,000,000 escrowed shares (the “Merger Escrow Shares”) to the amortizationPrincipal Stockholders shall be based upon the successful consummation of the unrecognized stock compensation expenses were acceleratedmerger with Spondoolies-Tech Ltd. (“Spondoolies”) on July 2, 2015 for a total $3,629,804.

There are no stock options outstanding as of September 30, 2015.

Note 11 - Commitments and Contingencies

On January 28, 2015, BTCS Digital Manufacturing a wholly owned subsidiary ofor before December 31, 2016 (the “Merger Condition”). The Merger Escrow Shares will be returned to the Company entered into a commercial lease agreement (the “Lease”). The term of the Lease commenced on January 28, 2015 and ends on January 25, 2017. The annual rental fee for the first and second year will be $58,271 and $66,750, respectively. The Company also has the option to purchase the property during the second year of the Lease termcancelation for a purchase price of $775,000 less the $10,000 security deposit and all lease payments.

On May 28, 2015no consideration if the Company entered an operating sub-lease agreement ending on May 31, 2016 for its headquarters in Arlington, Virginia. Prepaid expenses include $12,000 of fixed minimum lease payment that is prepaid through May 31, 2016.fails to achieve the Merger Condition.

Note 1210 - Subsequent Events

On October 14, 2015,April 21, 2016, the Company issued 162,037 sharesdismissed its independent registered public accounting firm Marcum LLP (“Marcum”) effective immediately. The dismissal was approved by the Board of common stock to an individual investor for his cashless warrants exercise.Directors (the “Board”) of the Company.

On October 29, 2015,April 21, 2016, the Company issued 40,000 sharesengaged RBSM LLP (“RBSM”) as the Company’s independent registered public accountant effective immediately.

On May 5, 2016, the Company was informed that, on May 4, 2016, a hearing was held in the district court (the “Court”) in Beersheva, Israel during which certain parties sought appointment of common stocka temporary liquidator for Spondoolies Tech Ltd. (“Spondoolies”). As a result of the hearing, the Court appointed a temporary liquidator and the judge presiding over the proceedings set a hearing for July 14, 2016, at least one week prior to which a consultant for investor relations services.certificate of information must be filed with the Court as required in the applicable regulations. The Company is seeking a conference with the temporary liquidator.

At the present time, there can be no assurance that the Company’s pending acquisition of Spondoolies can be effectuated and is examining what claims, if any, it may have in connection with such acquisition and the Company’s prior investments in Spondoolies.

ITEM 2 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Forward-Looking Statements

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). We have based these forward-looking statements on our current expectations and projections about future events. These forward-looking statements are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and assumptions about us that may cause our actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may,” “should,” “could,” “would,” “expect,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “continue,” or the negative of such terms or other similar expressions. Factors that might cause or contribute to such a discrepancy include, but are not limited to, those described in our other Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) filings. References to “we”, “us”, “our” or the “Company” are to BTCS Inc., except where the context requires otherwise. The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our condensed financial statements and related notes thereto included elsewhere in this report.

Overview

We are an early entrant in the digital currency ecosystem and one of the first U.S. publicly traded companies to be involved with digital currencies. We aim to enable users to engage in the digital currency ecosystem through one point of access - a universal digital currency platform. We plan to design and build this platform under the brand “Blockchain Technology Consumer Solutions,” or “BTCS.” We currently operate a beta ecommerce marketplace which already accepts a variety of digital currencies have designed a beta secure digital currency storage solution BTCS Wallet, and, since the second half of 2014, have been expanding our transaction verification services business, recently leasing and building out a 83,000 square foot facility and putting into service a suite of servers capable of generating bitcoins (i.e. bitcoin mining). In the short term, we believe our transaction verification services business willmay be a growing source of revenue for us. Revenues are earned in our transaction verification services business through running ASIC (application-specific integrated circuit) servers at our North Carolina facility. When our servers are successful in finding and adding a block to the Blockchain we are awarded bitcoins for our efforts, which awarded bitcoins are booked as revenue at the prevailing market price on the day of receipt. The Blockchain is maintained by a global network of participants which are running ASIC and other servers which secure the Blockchain. While we believe that we have a cost competitive facility and equipment with competitive processing power, the market is rapidly evolving and there can be no assurances that we will remain competitive with industry participants that have or may acquire facilities and equipment that are less costly and more efficient.

Transaction Verification Service Business (bitcoin mining)

We believe that with additional funding we can establish and expand aour low cost transaction verification services business (bitcoin mining) and believe this willmay provide revenue growth and synergies with our platform development efforts.growth. In January 2015, we entered into a two year lease for an 83,000 square foot facility. Additionally we have the option to purchase the property for $775,000 less the $10,000 security deposit and all lease payments. In July 2015 we completed the internal build out of our facility which increased our operating capacity to 3 megawatts (mw). We are currently using approximately 0.650.95 megawatts of the facility’s capacity and plan tomay increase our use of its capacity to 3 megawatts.

Transaction verification entails running ASIC (application-specific integrated circuit) servers which solve a set of prescribed complex mathematical calculations in order to add a block to the Blockchain and thereby confirm bitcoin transactions. When we are successful in adding a block to the Blockchain, we are awarded a fixed number of bitcoins for our effort. Over time it is anticipated that the rewarded value in newly issued bitcoins of adding a block to the Blockchain will decrease, and we expect to charge transaction fees to verify transactions. Over time as the reward value decreases we believe the lowest cost participants (miners) will set the market rate for transaction fees such that they remain profitable.

Given the size and low cost of our facility and electricity, we are also evaluatinghave begun offering hosted mining services as well asand are evaluating traditional data center services.services as well.

E-commerce Marketplace

We believe our e-commerce marketplace was the first such site to accept bitcoin. Our beta ecommerce marketplace nowis currently operational and offers over 250,000 curated products and utilizes our “Intelligent Shopping Engine” to find competitive prices on products from over 250 retailers. Products are curated through the application of filters such as popularity, reviews, categories, sales rank and other features which are chosen by management. In early 2014, we began a complete redesign of our ecommerce marketplace to incorporate our Intelligent Shopping Engine as a value added function to our ecommerce marketplace. During 2014, many new businesses (such as Dell, Microsoft, Overstock, NewEgg and TigerDirect) opted to accept bitcoin as a form of payment. While thisThis poses competition for our marketplace efforts we believe it strengthens the acceptance of bitcoin and should,has resulted in the long run, be beneficial toreduced consumer interest in our planned universal platform.e-commerce marketplace.

Although we have turned our focus on developing our transaction verification services business, our online ecommerce marketplace remains hosted, maintained, and developed by us.maintained. We have developed software that allows us to interface with vendors and search for competitive prices in real time and display up-to-date inventory, and present prices in bitcoin, litecoin or dogecoin according to the exchange rate from USD. The exchange rate is updated frequently and at each stage of the checkout process, when customers reach the checkout page the exchange rate is locked in by our payment processor for 15 minutes and our payment processor assumes the currency exchange risk (unless we choose to accept the digital currency). All marketplace customer orders are fulfilled by third party vendors and we are not involved in the logistics chain, however, we oversee the fulfillment process and strive for a smooth shopping experience. Our payment processor allows us to select a ratio of cash versus each respective digital currency we accept. We charge our customers a processing fee of approximately three percent (which management may change from time to time) on transactions if we are not in the affiliate program with the end retailer selling a particular product. If we are a part of an affiliate program we are paid affiliate fees by the retailer which varies depending on both the retailer and by product which can range from one to fifteen percent.

Strategic Partnerships

We have partnered with and invested in five digital currency companies (collectively referred to herein as our Partner Companies,“Partner Companies”) to further our efforts to build a universal digital currency platform. We have integrated with GoCoin.GoCoin LLC (“GoCoin”). GoCoin is an international payment platform enabling online and retail merchants a way to accept bitcoin, litecoin and dogecoin as payment methods. We have also integrated with Gem. Gem offers a secure software development toolkit for companies to develop multi-signature storage solutions to store bitcoin. We have invested in and currently utilize Spondoolies Tech Ltd. (“Spondoolies”) and other manufacturers of ASIC servers for our transaction verification services business. We have also invested in Coin Outlet which manufactures and operates AML/KYC compliant bitcoin ATM’s and Expresscoin who’s service enables consumers a method to access and buy bitcoin and various other altcoins.

Blockchain Technologies and Other Growth Initiatives

We are also keenly focused on other blockchain technologies. Since the most prominent use case for blockchain technologies is digital currencies (or more specifically, bitcoin), it remains our core focus. Nonetheless, we anticipate continuing to evaluate other blockchain technology opportunities, as well as technologies that are complementary to our business strategy in an effort to minimize risks and enhance shareholder value. This will include evaluating opportunities that diversify our revenue streams, and provide other consumer services and provide on-ramps for new users.services.

Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended September 30,March 31, 2016 and 2015 and 2014

The following table reflects our operating results for the three months ended September 30, 2015March 31, 2016 and 2014:2015:

Revenues

Revenues for the three months ended September 30,March 31, 2016 and 2015 were approximately $199,000 and 2014 were $169,069 and $1,520,$39,000, respectively. Revenues represent net revenue earned from the processing of customer transactions through our ecommerce website, and through fees earned from our transaction verification service (bitcoin mining) business.business, and fees charged for hosting services. The increase of $167,549approximately $160,000 or 11,023%4,103% is primarily a result of fees earned from our transaction verification service business which accounted for 96% of our revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2015.March 31, 2016.

Power and Mining Expenses

Power and mining expenses for the three months ended September 30,March 31, 2016 and 2015 were approximately $114,000 and 2014 were $101,824 and $0,$17,000, respectively. The increase in the powerPower and mining expenses is the result of electric costs and miner commissions for our transaction verification services business. Our electricity cost is a variable expense subject to certain demand charges which change based upon on and off peak usage and seasonal billing rates.  Our power consumption and resulting electricity cost is determined by the power settings of our transaction verification servers and other ancillary equipment used in the building.

Operating Expenses

Operating expenses for the three months ended September 30,March 31, 2016 and 2015 were approximately $0.4 million and 2014 were $4,168,808 and $2,592,727, of which $3,866,146 and $2,251,056 were related to non-cash charges, such as depreciation and amortization expenses, common stock and warrants issued for services, and stock based compensation,$1.6 million, respectively. The increasedecrease in operating expenses over the prior year mostly relates to an increase of $1,382,004decrease in non-cashgeneral and administrative expenses, which is primarily due to decrease in stock based compensation cost and an increase of $27,287 in professional services offset by a decrease of $57,365 in marketing and general administrative costs.approximately $1.4 million.

Fair Value Adjustments for Derivative Liabilities

For the three months ended September 30, 2015, we recognized a gain on derivative liabilities of $286,087, due to the change in fair value of warrants sold in the January Private Placement and April Private Placement as a result of a decrease in the market price of our Common Stock, that are subject to a “Most Favored Nations” provision for a period of 12 months from the closing of the January Private Placement and April Private Placement in the event the Company issues Common Stock. This liability is subject to re-measurement at each balance sheet date until exercised, and any change in fair value is recognized in our condensed consolidated statements of operations. The fair value of the warrants has been estimated using a Monte Carlo simulation.

Results of Operations for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015 and 2014

The following table reflects our operating results for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014: