UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

FORM 10-Q

 

(Mark One)

 

[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the quarterly period ended March 31,September 30, 2017

 

or

 

[  ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the transition period from ________________ to ___________________

 

Commission File Number:000-55131

 

BARFRESH FOOD GROUP INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

Delaware27-1994406
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
  
85308383 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 450,750, Beverly Hills, California90211
(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip Code)

 

310-598-7113
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Not Applicable

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

[X] Yes [  ] No

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

[X] Yes [  ] No

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

 

Large Accelerated Filer [  ]Accelerated Filer [  ]
Non-Accelerated Filer [  ] (do not check if Smaller Reporting Company) [  ]Smaller Reporting Company [X]
  
Smaller Reporting Company [X]Emerging Growth Company [  ]

 

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. [  ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

[  ] Yes [X] No

 

As of May 8,November 6, 2017, there were 117,537,263118,428,967 outstanding shares of common stock of the registrant.

 

 

 

 

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

 

Page

Number

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION3
  
Item 1.Financial Statements.3
Item 2.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.1112
Item 3.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.1618
Item 4.Controls and Procedures.1618
   
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION17
  
Item 1.Legal Proceedings.1719
Item 1A.Risk Factors.1719
Item 2.Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.1719
Item 3.Defaults Upon Senior Securities.1719
Item 4.Mine Safety Disclosures.1719
Item 5.Other Information.1719
Item 6.Exhibits.1719
   
SIGNATURES1820

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

 

Item 1. Financial Statements.

 

Barfresh Food Group Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

 

 March 31, 2017 December 31, 2016  September 30, 2017 December 31, 2016 
 (Unaudited) (Audited)  (Unaudited) (Audited) 
Assets             
Current assets:                
Cash $7,449,931  $9,180,947  $3,548,107  $9,180,947 
Accounts Receivable  237,015   131,088   611,468   131,088 
Inventory  275,781   317,948   751,586   317,948 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  96,468   25,864   116,989   25,864 
Total current assets  8,059,195   9,655,847   5,028,150   9,655,847 
Property, plant and equipment, net of depreciation  1,599,346   1,494,478   1,726,963   1,494,478 
Intangible asset, net of amortization  609,596   619,863   601,352   619,863 
Deposits  48,758   53,202   48,144   53,202 
Total Assets $10,316,895  $11,823,390  $7,404,609  $11,823,390 
                
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity                
Current liabilities:                
Accounts payable $202,135  $153,756  $401,606  $153,756 
Accrued expenses  885,187   746,540   1,005,958   746,375 
        
Deferred rent liability  907   165 
Current portion of long term debt  3,849   3,849   3,849   3,849 
Total current liabilities  1,091,171   904,145   1,412,320   904,145 
Long Term Debt, net of current portion  7,998   8,958   6,079   8,958 
Total liabilities  1,099,169   913,103   1,418,399   913,103 
                
Commitments and contingencies (Note _)        
Commitments and contingencies (Note 6)        
                
Stockholders’ equity:                
Preferred stock, $0.000001 par value, 5,000,000 shares authorized, none issued or outstanding  -   -   -   - 
Common stock, $0.000001 par value; 300,000,000 shares authorized; 117,512,263 and 117,103,276 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively  118   117 
Common stock, $0.000001 par value; 300,000,000 shares authorized; 118,429,007 and 117,103,276 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively  119   117 
Additional paid in capital  36,496,105   35,829,627   37,508,364   35,829,627 
Accumulated deficit  (27,278,497)  (24,919,457)  (31,522,273)  (24,919,457)
Total stockholders’ equity  9,217,726   10,910,287   5,986,210   10,910,287 
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity $10,316,895  $11,823,390  $7,404,609  $11,823,390 

 

See the accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements

Barfresh Food Group Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations

For the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016

(Unaudited)

 

 2017 2016  For the three months ended
September 30,
 For the nine months ended
September 30,
 
Revenue $312,170  $275,326 
 2017 2016 2017 2016 
Revenue, net $679,952  $478,680  $1,621,119  $1,313,178 
Cost of revenue  181,649   140,735   334,376   265,072   822,902   683,741 
Gross profit  130,521   134,591   345,576   213,608   798,217   629,437 
                        
Operating expenses:                        
General and administrative  2,433,530   2,574,066   2,337,634   2,520,632   7,174,457   7,819,348 
Depreciation and amortization  56,031   46,747 
Depreciation and Amortization  93,975   51,645   226,576   150,452 
Total operating expenses  2,489,561   2,620,813   2,431,609   2,572,277   7,401,033   7,969,800 
                        
Operating loss  (2,359,040)  (2,486,222)  (2,086,033)  (2,358,669)  (6,602,816)  (7,340,363)
                        
Other expenses                        
Interest  -   221,332   -   7,677   -   243,150 
                        
Net (loss) $(2,359,040) $(2,707,554) $(2,086,033) $(2,366,346) $(6,602,816) $(7,583,513)
                        
Per share information - basic and fully diluted:                        
Weighted average shares outstanding  117,251,662   89,276,586   118,382,934   95,857,003   117,790,039   93,256,264 
Net (loss) per share $(0.02) $(0.03) $(0.02) $(0.02) $(0.06) $(.08)

 

See the accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements

Barfresh Food Group Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

For the threenine months ended March 31,September 30, 2017 and 2016

(Unaudited)

 

 2017 2016  2017 2016 
Net Cash used in operations $(1,614,825) $(1,612,451) $(5,224,812) $(5,590,671)
                
Cash flow from investing activities:                
Investment in trademark  (5,132)  (369)  (27,684)  (56,028)
Purchase of equipment  (146,440)  (421,131)  (412,865)  (985,315)
Sale of equipment  940   -   -   26,374 
Net Cash (used in) investing activities  (150,632)  (421,500)
Net Cash used in investing activities  (440,549)  (1,014,969)
                
Cash flow from financing activities:                
Exercise of Warrant  35,401   240,000 
Exercise of Warrants  35,400   414,997 
Repayment of long term debt  (2,879)  (20,504)
Issuance of common stock and warrants for cash  -   3,269,996   -   5,686,992 
Exercise of Option  -   25,500 
Repayment of long term debt  (960)  (3,512)
Exercise of Options for cash  -   25,500 
Net cash provided by financing activities  34,441   3,531,983   32,521   6,106,985 
                
Net increase (decrease) in cash  (1,731,016)  1,498,032 
Net (decrease) in cash  (5,632,840)  (498,655)
Cash at beginning of period  9,180,947   1,986,004   9,180,947   1,986,004 
Cash at end of period $7,449,931  $3,484,036  $3,548,107  $1,487,349 
                
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:                
Cash paid for interest $-  $-  $-  $6,143 
Cash paid for income taxes $-  $-  $-  $- 
                
Non-cash financial activities                
Common Stock issued for services $22,250  $50,000  $185,810  $165,150 
Common Stock issued on conversion of note $-  $2,529,453  $-  $2,479,456 
Common Stock issued on conversion of convertible note $-  $50,000  $-  $319,507 
Fair value of warrants issued with convertible notes $-  $50,000 

 

See the accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements

5

Barfresh Food Group Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

September 30, 2017

(Unaudited)

Note 1. Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies

 

Throughout this report, the terms “our”, “we”, “us” and the “Company” refer to Barfresh Food Group Inc., including its subsidiaries. The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of Barfresh Food Group Inc. at March 31,September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) for interim financial statements, instructions to Form 10-Q, and Regulation S-X. Accordingly, certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been condensed or omitted. These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016. In management’s opinion, all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary for a fair presentation to make our financial statements not misleading have been included. The results of operations for the periods ended March 31,September 30, 2017 and 2016 presented are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. The December 31, 2016 balance sheet has been derived from our audited financial statements included in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.

 

Basis of Consolidation

The condensed consolidated financial statements include the financial statements of the Company and our wholly owned subsidiaries Barfresh Inc. and Barfresh Corporation, Inc.

 

Use of Estimates

 

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and revenues and expenses during the years reported. Actual results may differ from these estimates.

 

Concentration of Credit Risk

The amount of cash on deposit with financial institutions exceeds the $250,000 federally insured limit at March 31,September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016. However, we believe that the financial institution where the cash on deposit that exceeds $250,000 is financially sound and the risk of loss is minimal.

Fair Value Measurement

Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 820,Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (“ASC 820”), provides a comprehensive framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures which are required about fair value measurements. Specifically, ASC 820 sets forth a definition of fair value and establishes a hierarchy prioritizing the inputs to valuation techniques, giving the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable value inputs. ASC 820 defines the hierarchy as follows:

 

 Level 1 - Quoted prices are available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reported date. The types of assets and liabilities included in Level 1 are highly liquid and actively traded instruments with quoted prices, such as equities listed on the New York Stock Exchange.
  
 Level 2 - Pricing inputs are other than quoted prices in active markets, but are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reported date. The types of assets and liabilities in Level 2 are typically either comparable to actively traded securities or contracts or priced with models using highly observable inputs.
  
 Level 3 - Significant inputs to pricing that are unobservable as of the reporting date. The types of assets and liabilities included in Level 3 are those with inputs requiring significant management judgment or estimation, such as complex and subjective models and forecasts used to determine the fair value of financial transmission rights.

 

Our financial instruments consist of accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued expenses and installment debt. The carrying value of our financial instruments approximates their fair value due to their relative short maturities and the nature of the debt.

Barfresh Food Group Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

September 30, 2017

(Unaudited)

Inventory

 

Inventory consists of finished goods and is carried at the lower of cost or marketnet realizable value on a first in first out basis.

Intangible Assets

 

Intangible assets are comprised of patents, net of amortization, and trademarks. The patent costs are being amortized over the life of the patents, which is twenty years from the date of filing the patent applications. In accordance with ASC Topic 350Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (“ASC 350”), the costs of internally developing other intangible assets, such as patents, are expensed as incurred. However, as allowed by ASC 350, legal fees and similar costs relating to patents have been capitalized. In accordance with ASC 350 legal costs related to trademarks have been capitalized. We have determined that trademarks have an indeterminable life and therefore are not being amortized.

 

Property, Plant and Equipment

 

Property, plant and equipment is stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and accumulated impairment loss, if any. Depreciation is calculated on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Leasehold improvements are being amortized over the shorter of the useful life of the asset or the lease term that includes any expected renewal periods deemed to be reasonably assured. The estimated useful lives used for financial statement purposes are:

 

Furniture and fixtures: 5 years

Equipment: 7 years

Leasehold improvements: 2 years

Vehicle: 5 years

 

Revenue Recognition

 

We recognize revenue from products sold when there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement, delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, the sales price is determinable and collection is reasonably assured.

 

Earnings per Share

 

We calculate net loss per share in accordance with ASC Topic 260,Earnings per Share. Basic net loss per share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding for the period, and diluted earnings per share is computed by including common stock equivalents outstanding for the period in the denominator. At March 31,September 30, 2017 and 2016 any equivalents would have been anti-dilutive as we had losses for the periods then ended.

 

Research and Development

 

Expenditures for research activities relating to product development and improvement are charged to expense as incurred. We incurred $114,601$107,324 and $68,568$101,304 for the three-month periods ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. We incurred $447,927 and $256,874 in research and development expenses for the three-monthnine-month periods ended March 31,September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Rent Expense

 

We recognize rent expense on a straight-line basis over the reasonably assured lease term as defined in ASC Topic 840,Leases(“ASC 840”).

 

Recent pronouncements

From time to time, new accounting pronouncements are issued that we adopt as of the specified effective date. We believe that the impact of recently issued standards not yet effective may have an impact on our results of operations and financial position.

Barfresh Food Group Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

September 30, 2017

(Unaudited)

 

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU Update 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), which converged guidance on recognizing revenue in contracts with customers on an effective date after our year ending December 31, 2017. The Company is in the initial stages of evaluating the effect of the standard on our financial statements and continue to evaluate the available transition methods. However, based on our initial evaluation, we do not expect there to be material changes to our current Revenue Recognition policies due to the non-complex contracts with our customers, including the definition of our performance obligations and the transaction prices in our contracts with our customers. The Company does not plan to adopt the standard until the interim period ended March 31, 2018.

In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-11, Inventory, which simplifies the measurement principle of inventories valued under the First-In, First-Out (“FIFO”) or weighted average methods from the lower of cost or market to the lower of cost and net realizable value. ASU 2015-11 is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016 including interim periods within those annual periods. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-17, Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes, which requires that deferred tax assets and liabilities be classified as noncurrent on the balance sheet. ASU 2015-17 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within those annual periods. Early adoption is permitted as of the beginning of an interim or annual reporting period. Upon adoption, ASU 2015-17 may be applied either prospectively or retrospectively. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on our financial statements.

 

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases, to improve financial reporting about leasing transactions. This ASU will require organizations that lease assets (“lessees”) to recognize a lease liability and a right-of-use asset on its balance sheet for all leases with terms of more than twelve months. A lease liability is a lessee’s obligation to make lease payments arising from a lease, measured on a discounted basis and a right-of-use asset represents the lessee’s right to use, or control use of, a specified asset for the lease term. The amendments in this ASU leaves the accounting for the organization that own the assets leased to the lessee (“lessor”) largely unchanged except for targeted improvements to align it with the lessee accounting model and Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers.

 

The Company is in the initial stages of evaluating the effect of the standard on our financial statements and continue to evaluate the available transition methods. However, based on our initial evaluation, we do not expect there to be material changes to both our current and long-term lease liabilities and our fixed assets of our limited number of operating leases that will be converted to financing leases under the new guidance. The Company does not plan to adopt the standard until the interim period ended March 31, 2019.

 

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718) (“ASU 2016-09”). The standard identifies areas for simplification involving several aspects of accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, an option to recognize stock compensation expense with actual forfeitures recognized as they occur, as well as certain classifications on the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-09 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted. The Company previously adopted ASU 2016-09.

In August 2014, the FASB issued FASB ASU2014-15,Presentation of Financial Statements – Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40): Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entities Ability to Continue as a Going Concern. FASB ASU 2015-15 changes the disclosure requirements of uncertainties about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. FASB ASU2014-15 is effective for annual periods ending after December 15, 2016, and for interim periods within annual periods beginning after that date. These changes require an entity’s management to evaluate whether there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about an entities ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date the financial statements are issued. If management has concluded that substantial doubt exists, then the following disclosures should be made in the financial statements: (i) principal conditions or events that raised the substantial doubt; (ii) management’s evaluation of the significance of those conditions or events in relation to the entities ability to meet those obligations; (iii) management’s plans that alleviated the initial substantial doubt or, if substantial doubt was not alleviated, management’s plans that are intended to at least mitigate the conditions or events that raise the substantial doubt, and (iv) if management’s plans did not alleviate the substantial doubt, an explicit statement that there is a substantial doubt. These changes are reflected in the disclosure included in Note 10.

Barfresh Food Group Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

September 30, 2017

(Unaudited)

 

Note 2. Property Plant and Equipment

 

Major classes of property and equipment at March 31,September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 consist of the following:

 

 2017 2016  2017 2016 
Furniture and fixtures $1,524  $1,524  $1,524  $1,524 
Manufacturing Equipment  1,637,975   1,605,317 
Equipment  1,833,791   1,605,317 
Leasehold Improvements  4,886   4,800   4,886   4,800 
Vehicles  29,696   29,696   29,696   29,696 
  1,674,081   1,641,337   1,869,897   1,641,337 
Less: accumulated depreciation  (437,495)  (396,863)  (577,243)  (396,863)
  1,236,586   1,244,474   1,292,654   1,244,474 
Equipment not yet placed in service  362,760   250,004   434,309   250,004 
Property and equipment, net of depreciation $1,599,346  $1,494,478  $1,726,963  $1,494,478 

 

We recorded depreciation expense related to these assets of $40,632$78,576 and $31,415$36,268 for the three-month periods ended March 31,September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively and $180,380 and $104,367 for the nine- months periods ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

 

Note 3. Intangible Assets

 

As of March 31,September 30, 2017, intangible assets consist of patent costs of $750,640,$764,891, trademarks of $79,057$87,360 and accumulated amortization of $220,101.$250,899.

 

As of December 31, 2016, intangible assets consist of patent costs of $750,640, trademarks of $73,925 and accumulated amortization of $204,702.

The amounts carried on the balance sheet represent cost to acquire, legal fees and similar costs relating to the patents incurred by the Company. Amortization is calculated through the expiration date of the patent, which is December 2025. The amount charged to expenses for amortization of the patent costs was $15,399$15,398 and $15,332$15,376 for the three months ended March 31,September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and $46,196 and $46,085 for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

 

Estimated future amortization expense related to patents as of March 31,September 30, 2017, is as follows:

 

 Total Amortization  Total
Amortization
 
Years ending December 31,       
2017 $46,196  $15,902 
2018  61,595   63,610 
2019  61,595   63,610 
2020  61,595   63,610 
2022  61,595   63,610 
2023  61,595   63,610 
Later years  176,368   116,430 
 $530,539  $513,992 

 

Note 4. Related Parties

 

As disclosed below in Note 7, members of management and directors have received shares of stock and options in exchange for services.

 

Note 5. Long term Debt

 

Long term debt at March 31,September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 consists of an installment agreement on one vehicle maturing in JuneSeptember 2020. The installment agreement bears no interest. Monthly payments are $320 per month.

 

Barfresh Food Group Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

September 30, 2017

(Unaudited)

The annual maturities of long term debt are as follows:

 

For years ending December 31,      
2017  2,889  $970 
2018  3,849  3,849 
2019  3,849  3,849 
2020  1,260   1,260 
 $11,847  $9,928 

 

Note 6. Commitments and Contingencies

 

We lease office space under non-cancelable operating leases, which expires on March 31, 2019. The aggregate minimum requirements are as follows:

 

For years ending December 31,      
2017 $99,465  $37,545 
2018  167,530   167,530 
2019  43,462   43,462 
 $310,557  $248,537 

 

Note 7. Stockholders’ Equity

 

During the threenine months ended March 31,September 30, 2017, we issued 31,250178,733 shares of common stock, valued at $22,500,$112,250, for services. In addition, we issued 364,249439,977 options to purchase our common stock to certain member of the Board of Directors in lieu of cash payments for Director fees. The exercise price of the options ranged from $0.74 to $0.77$0.79 per share, vest immediately, and are exercisable for periods of 8 years. In addition, we issued 1,480,000 options to purchase our common stock to employees and executives. The exercise price of the options ranged from $0.61 to $0.68 per share, vest after 3 years, and are exercisable for periods of 8 years. We also issued 95,995 shares of our common stock, with a value of $73,560, to a member of our Board of Directors in lieu of cash payments for Director fees.

 

The fair value of the options ($216,000,266,000, in the aggregate) was calculated using the Black-Sholes option pricing model, based on the criteria shown below.

Expected life (in years)  8 
Volatility (based on a comparable company)  81.8% - 89%
Risk Free interest rate  2.19%2.01% to 2.35 %%
Dividend yield (on common stock)  - 

 

The shares of our common stock were valued at the trading price on the date of grant, $0.75 and $0.79 per share

During the same period, we cancelled 40,00090,000 options to purchase our common stock.

 

Holders of 59,000 options,warrants, exercised those optionwarrants for cash proceeds of $35,400. The holderholders of 800,000950,000 options elected to exercise those optionoptions on a cashless basis and received 238,596276,171 shares of our common stock.

 

Holders of 180,000 warrants, elected to exercise those warrants on a cashless basis and received 40,832 shares of our common stock.

 

The total amount of equity based compensation for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 included in additional paid in capital for the three-month periods ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 was $344,268$575,224 and $244,789,$270,252, respectively, and for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, was $1,181,798 and $515,041, respectively.

Barfresh Food Group Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

September 30, 2017

(Unaudited)

 

The following is a summary of outstanding stock options issued to employees and directors as of March 31,September 30, 2017:

 

 Number of Options Exercise price
per share $
 Average
remaining
term in years
 Aggregate
intrinsic value at
date of grant $
  Number of
Options
 Exercise price
per share $
 Average
remaining
term in years
 Aggregate
intrinsic value at
date of grant $
 
Outstanding December 31, 2016  5,362,442       4.84       5,362,442   0.45 – 0.83   4.84     
Issued  364,249   .74 - .77   7.16       1,919,977   0.74 -0.79   7.75     
Cancelled  (40,000)              (90,000)            
Exercised  (859,000)              (950,000)            
Outstanding March 31, 2017  4,827,691       5.43     
Outstanding, September 30, 2017  6,242,419   0.55 – 0.72   5.90     
                                
Exercisable  1,294,249   .45 - .54   2.53   - 
Exercisable, September 30, 2017  1,069,977   0.45 - 0.79   4.44   - 

 

Note 8. Outstanding Warrants

 

The following is a summary of all outstanding warrants as of March 31,September 30, 2017:

 

 Number of warrants price per share remaining term
in years
 intrinsic value at date of grant  Number of
warrants
 price per share remaining term
in years
 intrinsic value
at date of grant
 
Warrants issued in connection with private placements of common stock  20,023,140  $0.25 - 1.50   1.40  $1,590,567   20,023,140   $ 0.25 - 1.50   1.20  $1,590,567 
Warrants issued in connection with short-term notes payable  3,345,509  $0.45-$0.485   2.74  $64,583   3,345,509   $ 0.45-$0.485   2.74  $64,583 

 

Note 9. Income Taxes

 

We account for income taxes in interim periods in accordance with ASC Topic 740, Income Taxes (“ASC 740”). We have determined an estimated annual effective tax rate. The rate will be revised, if necessary, as of the end of each successive interim period during our fiscal year to our best current estimate. As of March 31,September 30, 2017, the estimated effective tax rate for the year will be zero.

 

There are open statutes of limitations for taxing authorities in federal and state jurisdictions to audit our tax returns from 2009 through the current period. Our policy is to account for income tax related interest and penalties in income tax expense in the statement of operations. There have been no income tax related interest or penalties assessed or recorded.

 

ASC 740 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. This pronouncement also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition.

 

For the three-monthnine-month periods ended March 31,September 30, 2017 and 2016, we did not have any interest and penalties associated with tax positions. As of March 31,September 30, 2017, we did not have any significant unrecognized uncertain tax positions.

Note 10. Liquidity

We have a history of operating losses and negative cash flow. As our operations grow, we expect to experience significant increases in our working capital requirements. These conditions raise substantial doubt over the Company’s ability to meet all of its obligations over the twelve months following the filing of this Form 10-Q. Management has evaluated these conditions, and concluded that current plans will alleviate this concern. We currently have no debt. In addition, we have significantly reduced core operating costs beginning in 2016, including reducing the number of our employees from 44 to 30 over this time period. In addition, we plan to address this concern by raising additional capital through a loan or loans, and by continuing to reduce core operating expenses as required. While these plans have not yet been implemented, management has concluded that it is probable that they will be implemented within one year of the issuance of the financial statements, and that they will mitigate the substantial doubt of our ability to continue as a going concern. However, the Company cannot predict, with certainty, the outcome of its action to generate liquidity, including the availability of additional financing, or whether such actions would generate the expect liquidity as planned.

 

Note 10.11. Subsequent Events

 

Management has evaluated all activity and concluded that no subsequent events have occurred that would require recognition in the financial statements or disclosure in the notes to the financial statements.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

 

Thefollowingdiscussionshouldberead inconjunctionwiththefinancialinformationincludedelsewhere inthisQuarterly ReportonForm10-Q (this “Report”),includingourunauditedcondensed consolidatedfinancialstatements as of March 31, September 30, 2017and for thethree nine monthperiods ended March 31, September 30, 2017and2016and therelated notes.References inthisManagement’s Management’s DiscussionandAnalysis ofFinancialConditionandResultsof Operations sectionto“us” “us”, “we”,“our” “our” andsimilar termsrefer to BarfreshFood Group Inc.Thisdiscussionincludesforward-lookingstatements,asthat termisdefinedinthefederalsecuritieslaws, baseduponcurrentexpectations that involve risksanduncertainties,suchasplans,objectives,expectations and intentions.Actualresultsand thetiming of eventscould differmateriallyfromthoseanticipatedin theseforward-looking statements as aresultof anumber of factors. Wordssuchas “anticipate”,“estimate” “estimate”,“plan” “plan”,“continuing” “continuing”, “ongoing”,“expect” “expect”, “believe”,“intend” “intend”,“may” “may”,“will” “will”, “should”,“could” “could” andsimilar expressions are used toidentifyforward-lookingstatements.

 

Wecautionyouthatthesestatementsarenot guaranteesof future performance or eventsandaresubjecttoanumber of uncertainties, risksand other influences,manyofwhicharebeyond our control, which mayinfluence theaccuracy ofthestatementsand the projections uponwhich thestatementsarebased.Anyoneormoreoftheseuncertainties,risksand other influences couldmaterially affectourresultsofoperations and whetherforward-looking statementsmadeby us ultimately provetobe accurate. Ouractualresults,performanceandachievementscould differmateriallyfromthose expressedor impliedin theseforward-lookingstatements.Weundertakenoobligationtopublicly updateorreviseanyforward-lookingstatements,whetherfromnewinformation,future events or otherwise.

 

Barfresh is a leader in the creation, manufacturing and distribution of ready to blend frozen beverages. The current portfolio of products includes smoothies, shakes and frappes. All of theThe Company’s products areinclude portion controlled and ready to blend beverage ingredient packs or “beverage packs”. The beverage packs contain all of the solid ingredients necessary to make the beverage, including the base (either sorbet, frozen yogurt or ice cream), real fruit pieces, juices and ice – five ounces of water are added before blending. The Company’s products also include bulk “Easy Pour” ready to blend frozen beverages, which are manufactured in gallon containers and contain a concentrated product formula that is mixed “one to one” with water. The Company has also recently launched a “no sugar added” version of the bulk Easy Pour format that is specifically targeted for the USDA national school meal programs, including the School Breakfast Program, the National School Lunch Program, and Smart Snacks in Schools Program.

 

Domestic and international patents and patents pending are owned by Barfresh, as well as related trademarks for all of the products. In November 2011, the Company acquired the patent rights in the United States and Canada. The Canadian patent has been granted and the United States patent was granted on August 16, 2016. On October 15, 2013, the Company acquired all of the related international patent rights, which were filed pursuant to the Patent Cooperation Treaty and have been granted in 13 jurisdictions. The patents are pending in the remainder of the jurisdictions that have signed the treaty. In addition, on October 15, 2013, the Company purchased all of the trademarks related to the patented products.

 

The Company has conducted sales through twoseveral channels: through National Accounts, andAccounts; through an exclusive nationwide distribution agreement with Sysco Corporation (“Sysco”), the U.S.’s largest broadline distributor, which was entered into during July 2014.2014, and was recently extended for two years, and expanded to include bulk “Easy Pour” products; through a variety of national distributors that meet the exception to exclusivity in the Sysco contract, and through direct sales to customers (e.g., Penn State University).

 

The process of obtaining sales orders for National Accounts generally follows several steps, including product demonstration, product testing, and exclusive flavor development for the larger National Accounts. We are currently in various stages of product development and testing with a number of National Accounts and have recently launched in market tests with several major National Key accounts. The Company is focused on moving from in-market tests to national roll-out with those major National Key accounts.

 

In addition to the National Accounts, the Company sells to food distributors that supply products to the food services market place. Effective July 2, 2014, theThe Company entered intohas an exclusive agreement with Sysco Merchandising and Supply Chain Services, Inc. for resale by the Sysco Corporation (“Sysco”) to the foodservice industry of the Company’s ready-to-blend smoothies, shakes and frappes. All Barfresh products will beare included in Sysco’s national core selection of beverage items, making Barfresh its exclusive single-serve, pre-portioned beverage provider. The agreement is mutually exclusive;exclusive as to portion controlled products; however, Barfresh may also sell the products to other foodservice distributors, but only to the extent required for such foodservice distributors to service multi-unit chain operators with at least 20 units and where Sysco is not such multi-unit chain operators nominated distributor for our products. The agreement is not exclusive as to the bulk Easy Pour products.

The Company’s products have been included in Sysco’s “Cutting Edge Solutions” (“CES”) Platform since March of 2016, and are once again included in Sysco’s most recent CES Platform, announced during February of 2017. As part of this platform, our products will receive national advertising and marketing, and will be considered a core product. All 72 of SYSCO’s Operating Companies (“OPCO”) will participate in the CES program, and will be evaluated on their success in moving the CES products.

 

On October 26, 2015, Barfresh signed an agreement with PepsiCo North America Beverages, a division of PepsiCo, to become its exclusive sales representative within the food service channel to present Barfresh’s line of ready-to-blend smoothies and frozen beverages throughout the United States and Canada. Through this agreement, Barfresh’ products will beare included as part of PepsiCo’s offerings to its significant customer base, which the Company expects to fast track our growth and expedite the test to market process. The agreement gives Barfresh access to PepsiCo’s one-thousand plus person foodservice sales team, with Barfresh products becoming part of PepsiCo’s customer presentations.

 

The Company has recently announced several important new customer contracts. During Februaryplacement of 2017, the no sugar added version of its bulk Easy Pour product at 30 middle and high school cafeterias in Pasco County, Florida, representing a student body of over 40,000. Within the education channel, Barfresh is now being sold in a number of leading universities including Penn State University, Stanford, Colorado State, Florida State University and the University of Tennessee. The Company announced that it had opened a branded Barfresh kiosk at the Pepsi Center in Denver, Colorado. The kiosk is the culmination of efforts by the Barfresh sales team, PepsiCo North America Beverages, and Aramark. During March of 2017 the Companyalso recently announced that it had entered into a multi-year agreement to offer Barfresh smoothies at a Barfresh brandedcontract with one of Canada’s leading third party food service location at the Aquarium of the Pacific, in Long Beach, California. During March of 2017 the Company announced that it had entered into a multi-year agreementprovider to offer Barfresh smoothies at three branded food service locations at the Statue of Liberty monument on Ellis Island in New York City. During April of 2017 the Company announced that it had entered into a multi-year agreement with Centerplate, granting Barfresh access to offerprovide its smoothies to Centerplate’s multiple venues that serve over 116 million guests annually. And during April of 2017 the Company announced that it had rolled out itsbulk, Easy Pour product to the Landry, Inc. restaurant concept Bubba Gump Shrimp, Co.22 dining locations.

 

Finally, the Company intends to monetize the international patents outside of the current area of operations, North America, by expanding contract manufacturing to other countries and selling either through selling agents or internal sales personnel. The Company will also consider entering into some form of license or royalty agreements with third parties.

 

Barfresh currently utilizes contract manufacturers to manufacture all of the products in the United States. Ice cream manufacturers are best suited to produce the products and one production line is currently operational in our Salt Lake City contract manufacturer location. This manufacturer is currently producing products sold to existing customers as well as producing exclusive test products. Currently annual production capacity with our Salt Lake City contract manufacturer is 14 million units per year. In February 2016, the Company signed an agreement with Yarnell Operations, LLC, a subsidiary of Schulze and Burch, securing additional production capacity ahead of expected sales growth. Barfresh now has the capacity to ramp up to an incremental production capacity of 100 million units through this agreement. The Yarnell Operations, LLC, subsidiary is strategically located in Arkansas. Yarnell’s location enhances the company’s ability to efficiently move product throughout the supply chain to destinations in the eastern United States, home to many of the country’s large foodservice outlets.

 

Although there currently is not a contract in place with any suppliers for the raw materials needed to manufacture our products, there are a significant number of sources available and the company does not anticipate becoming dependent on any one supplier. As demand for the range of our products grows, we plan to contract a level of raw material requirements to ensure continuity of supply.

 

During November, 2016, the Company received an equity investment from Unibel, the majority shareholder of the Bel Group (“Unibel”). The Bel Group is headquartered in Paris, France, with global operations in 33 countries, 30 production sites on 4 continents and nearly 12,000 employees. Its many branded products, including The Laughing Cow®Cow®, Mini Babybel®Babybel® and Boursin®Boursin®, are sold in over 130 countries around the world. Pursuant to the securities purchase agreement, Unibel purchased 15,625,000 shares of common stock at $0.64 per share (“Shares”) and warrants to purchase 7,812,500 shares of common stock (“Warrants”) for aggregate gross proceeds to Barfresh of $10 million. The Warrants are exercisable for a term of five years at a per share price of $.088$.88 for cash. Pursuant to the Investor Rights agreement, Barfresh has registered the Shares and the Warrants, and Unibel was granted a seat on the Barfresh Board. This strategic investment provides Barfresh with the necessary capital to drive revenue growth while leveraging Unibel’s more than 150 years of industrial expertise, innovative capabilities, world-class marketing and branding expertise to accelerate our growth in new and existing markets and product channels.

 

Currently we have 3430 employees and 54 consultants. There are currently 2319 employees and 1 consultant selling our products.

Critical Accounting Policies

 

From time to time, newOur financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting pronouncementsprinciples generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”).

Revenue Recognition

We recognize revenue when there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement, delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, the sales price is determinable, and collection is reasonably assured. Revenue is recorded net of provisions for discounts, slotting fees, and promotion allowances. Our products are issued that we adopt assold on various terms. Our credit terms, which are established in accordance with local and industry practices, typically require payment within 30 days of delivery. We recognize revenue upon receipt of our products by our distributors and retail accounts, in accordance with written sales terms, net of provisions for discounts or allowances. Allowances for returns and discounts are made on a case-by-case basis. Historically, neither returns nor discounts have been material.

Impairments

We periodically evaluate whether the carrying value of long-lived assets has been impaired when circumstances indicate the carrying value of those assets may not be recoverable. The carrying amount is not recoverable if it exceeds the sum of the specified effective date. We believe thatundiscounted cash flows expected to result from the impactuse and eventual disposition of recently issued standardsthe asset. If the carrying value is not yet effective may have an impact on our resultsrecoverable, the impairment loss is measured as the excess of operations and financial position.the asset’s carrying value over its fair value.

 

In May 2014,Share-based Compensation

We account for share-based employee compensation plans under the FASB issued ASU Update 2014-09 Revenue from Contractsfair value recognition and measurement provisions in accordance with Customers (Topic 606)applicable accounting standards, which require all share-based payments to employees, including grants of stock options and restricted stock units (RSUs), which converged guidanceto be measured based on recognizing revenue in contracts with customers on an effectivethe grant date after our year ending December 31, 2017. The Company is in the initial stages of evaluating the effectfair value of the standard on our financial statements and continue to evaluateawards, with the available transition methods. However, based on our initial evaluation, we do not expect there to be material changes to our current Revenue Recognition policies due to the non-complex contracts with our customers, including the definition of our performance obligations and the transaction prices in our contracts with our customers. The Company does not plan to adopt the standard until the interim period ended March 31, 2018.

In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-11, Inventory, which simplifies the measurement principle of inventories valued under the First-In, First-Out (“FIFO”) or weighted average methods from the lower of cost or market to the lower of cost and net realizable value. ASU 2015-11 is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016 including interim periods within those annual periods. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.

In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-17, Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes, which requires that deferred tax assets and liabilities be classified as noncurrent on the balance sheet. ASU 2015-17 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within those annual periods. Early adoption is permitted as of the beginning of an interim or annual reporting period. Upon adoption, ASU 2015-17 may be applied either prospectively or retrospectively. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on our financial statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases, to improve financial reporting about leasing transactions. This ASU will require organizations that lease assets (“lessees”) to recognize a lease liability and a right-of-use asset on its balance sheet for all leases with terms of more than twelve months. A lease liability is a lessee’s obligation to make lease payments arising from a lease, measuredresulting expense generally recognized on a discountedstraight-line basis and a right-of-use asset representsover the lessee’s rightperiod during which the employee is required to use, or control use of, a specified assetperform service in exchange for the lease term. The amendments in this ASU leaves the accounting for the organization that own the assets leased to the lessee (“lessor”) largely unchanged except for targeted improvements to align it with the lessee accounting model and Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers.

The Company is in the initial stages of evaluating the effect of the standard on our financial statements and continue to evaluate the available transition methods. However, based on our initial evaluation, we do not expect there to be material changes to both our current and long-term lease liabilities and our fixed assets of our limited number of operating leases that will be converted to financing leases under the new guidance. The Company does not plan to adopt the standard until the interim period ended March 31, 2019.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718) (“ASU 2016-09”). The standard identifies areas for simplification involving several aspects of accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, an option to recognize stock compensation expense with actual forfeitures recognized as they occur, as well as certain classifications on the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-09 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted. The Company previously adopted ASU 2016-09.award.

 

Results of Operations

 

Results of Operation for Three Months Ended March 31,September 30, 2017 as Compared to the Three Months Ended March 31,September 30,2016

 

Revenue and cost of revenue

 

Revenue increased $36,844 (13%$201,272 (42%) from $275,326$478,680 in 2016 to $312,170$679,952 in 2017. The increase in revenue is primarily the result of the continuation of the national rollout of our new bulk Easy Pour product which began during the first quarter of 20162017 and has continued to gain momentum during the balance of the year. Our product continues to be distributed through all 72 of Sysco’s U.S. mainland distribution centers, as well as the addition ofthrough new customers beyond the Sysco distribution network. During the quarter ended March 31, 2017, our product was distributed through all 72 of Sysco’s distribution centers.

 

Cost of revenue for 2017 was $181,649$334,376 as compared to $140,735$265,072 in 2016. Our gross profit was $130,521 (42%$345,576 (51%) and $134,591 (49%$213,408 (45%) for 2017 and 2016, respectively. The change in our gross profit percentage was due to a change in the mix of our customer revenue, with an increasing portion of our revenue coming from larger National Accounts that are in test mode. We anticipate that our gross profit percentage for the remainder of 2017 will be comparable to the percentage for the current quarter.approximately 50% .

Operating expenses

 

Our operations during 2017 and 2016 were primarily directed towards increasing sales and expanding our distribution network.

 

Our general and administrative expenses decreased $140,536 (5%$182,998 (7.3%) from $2,574,066$ 2,520,632 in 2016 to $2,433,530$ 2,337,634 in 2017, reflecting bothwith the improvement primarily driven by lower personnel costs as a result ofexpenses resulting from the November 2016 realignment of our sales force, as well as lower travel expense. The first quarter of 2016 required unusually high travel activity due to the roll-out of our product to multiple Sysco distribution centers as part of the “Cutting Edge Solution” roll-out.force. The following is a breakdown of our general and administrative expenses for the three months ended March 31,September 30, 2017 and 2016:

 

 three months
ended
 three months
ended
   
 three months ended
March 31, 2017
 three months ended
March 31, 2016
 Difference  September 30, 2017 September 30, 2016 Difference 
Personnel costs $1,278,692  $1,512,304  $(233,612) $998,886  $1,386,141  $(387,255)
Stock based compensation/options  344,268   244,789   99,479   259,949   269,222   (9,273)
Legal and professional fees  113,014   151,400   (38,386)  103,729   129,346   (25,617)
Travel  92,861   136,758   (43,897)  84,694   157,746   (73,052)
Rent  54,241   22,947   31,294   42,674   31,977   10,697 
Marketing and selling  118,658   94,015   24,643   188,038   108,166   79,872 
Consulting fees  48,945   81,592   (32,647)  58,870   58,192   678 
Director fees  37,500   25,000   12,500   100,000   25,000   75,000 
Research and development  114,601   68,568   46,033   107,324   101,304   6,020 
Shipping and Storage  64,154   85,960   (21,806)  235,683   113,674   122,009 
Other expenses  166,596   150,733   15,863   157,787   139,864   17,923 
 $2,433,530  $2,574,066  $(140,536) $2,337,634  $2,520,632  $(182,998)

 

Personnel cost represents the cost of employees including salaries, bonuses, employee benefits and employment taxes and continues to be our largest cost. Personnel cost decreased $233,612 (15%$387,255 (28%) from $1,512,304$1,386,141 to $1,278,692. During the first quarter of the prior year we significantly increased our sales staff primarily as a result of the national roll-out of our distribution agreement with Sysco. At the end of the prior quarter, we had 46 full time employees compared to 33 at the end of the current quarter.$998,886. During the fourth quarter of 2016, we affected a restructuring of our sales force, whereby we eliminated 13 full time sales positions, and replaced the associated sales territory coverage with brokerage arrangements. This change will allowhas allowed our remaining sales force to more effectively focus on pursuing larger accounts, while our expanded brokerage network will support and expand our “up and down the street” business. This restructuring is the primary driver for the reduction in personnel costs in the third quarter. In addition, after the end of the third quarter, we affected a further restructuring of our sales force, whereby we eliminated an additional 5 full time sales position. We expect this further restructuring to result in estimated additional annualized savings of $700,000, bringing the changetotal annualized savings resulting from these two sales force restructurings to reduce our overall overhead costs by a net $1$2.2 to $2.7 million to $1.5 million on an annualized basis.

We do not anticipate any further significant changes to our personnel organization during the balance of 2017.

 

Stock based compensation is used as an incentive to attract new employees and to compensate existing employees. Stock based compensation includes stock issued and options granted to employees and non-employees. DuringStock compensation for the fourthcurrent quarter of 2016, we made additional grants to our sales force members who are remainingwas in line with the prior quarter. The Company after our personnel restructuring, and we also madeissues additional grantsstock options to our senior executive team, which grants had been authorized earlier in the year, for issuance after completion of the most recent bridge financing. All of these factors contributedits employees from time to higher expense within the current period.time under its Equity Compensation Plan.

 

Legal and professional fees decreased $ 38,386 (25%$25,617 (20%) from $151,400$129,346 in 2016 to $113,044$103,729 in 2017. The decreaseddecrease was primarily due to a decrease intiming of legal services required. We anticipate legal fees related to our business and financing activities to increase as our business continues to grow.

 

Travel expenses decreased $43,897 (32%$73,052 (46%) from $136,758$157,746 in 2016 to $92,861$84,694 in 2017. The decrease is primarily due to higher travel expenses that were incurred during the first quarter of 2016 in connection with the Sysco Cutting Edge Solution roll-out, as well as a reduction in travel costs associated with terminated employees. We anticipate that travel expenses for the balance of this year will be consistentlower than the third quarter expenses, as a result of reduced travel costs associated with the firstadditional employees terminated after the end of the third quarter.

Rent expense is primarily for our location in Beverly Hills, California. Rent expense for the Beverly Hills office is approximately $10,996 per month. We have entered into a new lease for office space at 8383 Wilshire Boulevard, Beverly Hills, California. The new lease commenced on November 1, 2016 and expires in February 8, 2018.March 31, 2019.

 

Marketing and selling expenses increased $24,643 (26%$$79,872 (74%) from $94,015$108,166 in 2016 to $118,658$188,038 in 2017. Higher marketing and selling expenses were primarily due to higher sales commissions paidassociated with higher sales during the quarter.

Consulting fees were $58,870 in 2017, as compared with $58,192 in 2016. Our consulting fees vary based on needs. We engaged consultants in the areas of sales and operations during the quarter. The need for future consulting services will be variable

Director fees increased $75,000 from $25,000 in 2016 to $100,000 in 2017. The increase was due to both the addition of a director during the fourth quarter of 2016, and the timing of recording fees. Annual director fees are anticipated at $50,000 per non-employee director.

Research and development expenses increased $ 6,020 from $ 101,304 in 2016 to $ 107,324 in 2017. During the third quarter of 2016 we re-classified certain personnel expenses that had previously been included in Personnel Expense, to Research and Development. These expenses relate to the services performed by our Director of Manufacturing and Product Development, and consultants supporting that employee. The re-classification is shown in both the current period and the prior period.

Shipping and storage expense increased $ 122,009 (107%) from $ 113,674 in 2016 to $ 235,683 in 2017. Shipping and storage expense as a percentage of revenue increased from 24% in 2016 to 35% in 2017. The higher expense in 2017 is due to a number of factors, including the continued movement of inventory to new forward warehouses as the Company expanded its business into Canada, movement of sample inventory into position for trade shows and customer demonstrations, and special situation ordering of raw materials for production and R&D runs. We anticipate that shipping and storage expense as a percentage of sales will reduce during the balance of the year, as the Company is able to take advantage of more efficient distribution arrangements.

Other expenses consist of ordinary operating expenses such as investor relations, office, telephone, insurance, and stock related costs. We anticipate increases in certain of these expenses, as our business continues to grow.

We had operating losses of $2,086,033 and $2,358,669 for the three month periods ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Interest expense decreased from $7,677 in 2016 to zero in 2017. Interest primarily relates to convertible debt that was issued in November, 2015, and converted into stock during February, 2016, and short term notes that were issued in December 2013, all of which were repaid prior to the current quarter.

 

We had net losses of $2,086,033 and $2,366,346 in the three month periods ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Results of Operation for Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 as Compared to the Nine Months Ended September 30,2016

Revenue and cost of revenue

Revenue increased $307,941 (23%) from $ 1,313,178 in 2016 to $ 1,621,119 in 2017. The increase in revenue is primarily the result of the rollout of our new bulk Easy Pour product which began during the first quarter of 2017 and has gained momentum during the second and third quarter. Our product continues to be distributed through all 72 of Sysco’s U.S. mainland distribution centers, as well as the addition of new customers beyond the Sysco distribution network.

Cost of revenue for 2017 was $ 822,902 as compared to $ 683,741 in 2016. Our gross profit was $ 798,217 (49%) and $ 629,437 (48%) for 2017 and 2016, respectively. We anticipate that our gross profit percentage for the remainder of 2017 will be approximately 50%.

Operating expenses

Our operations during 2017 and 2016 were primarily directed towards increasing sales and expanding our distribution network.

Our general and administrative expenses decreased $644,891 (8.25%) from $7,819,348 in 2016 to $7,174,457 in 2017, with the improvement primarily driven by lower personnel expenses resulting from the November 2016 realignment of our sales force. The following is a breakdown of our general and administrative expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016:

  nine months
ended
  nine months
ended
    
  September 30, 2017  September 30, 2016  Difference 
Personnel costs $3,276,377  $4,351,271  $(1,074,894)
Stock based compensation/options  876,253   784,263   91,990 
Legal and professional fees  359,961   362,385   (2,424)
Travel  313,094   447,733   (134,639)
Rent  130,472   73,925   56,547 
Marketing and selling  453,280   433,863   19,417 
Consulting fees  155,371   191,875   (36,504)
Director fees  156,296   75,000   81,296 
Research and development  447,927   256,874   191,053 
Shipping and Storage  468,952   319,525   149,427 
Other expenses  536,474   522,634   13,840 
  $7,174,457  $7,819,348  $(644,891)

Personnel cost represents the cost of employees including salaries, bonuses, employee benefits and employment taxes and continues to be our largest cost. Personnel cost decreased $ 1,074,894 (25%) from $ 4,351,271 to $ 3,276,377. During the fourth quarter of 2016, we affected a restructuring of our sales force, whereby we eliminated 13 full time sales positions, and replaced the associated sales territory coverage with brokerage arrangements. This change has allowed our remaining sales force to more effectively focus on pursuing larger accounts, while our expanded brokerage network will support and expand our “up and down the street” business. This restructuring is the primary driver for the reduction in personnel costs in the first nine months of 2017. In addition, after the end of the third quarter of this year, we affected a further restructuring of our sales force, whereby we eliminated an additional 5 full time sales position. We expect this further restructuring to result in additional annualized savings of $700,000 bringing the total annualized savings resulting from these two sales force restructurings to $2.2 to $2.7 million

Stock based compensation is used as an incentive to attract new employees and to compensate existing employees. Stock based compensation includes stock issued and options granted to employees and non-employees. Stock compensation for the first nine months of 2017 was $ 876,253, an increase of $ 91,990, or 12%, as compared with the first nine months of 2016, which was $784,263. The increase in stock based compensation expense was primarily due to additional stock option grants made to our employees during the fourth quarter of 2016. The Company issues additional stock options to its employees from time to time under its Equity Compensation Plan.

Legal and professional fees decreased $ 2,424 (1%) from $ 362,385 in 2016 to $359,961 in 2017. We anticipate that legal fees related to our business and financing activities will increase as our business continues to grow.

Travel expenses decreased $ 134,689 (30%) from $ 447,733 in 2016 to $313,094 in 2017. The decrease is primarily due to reduction in travel costs associated with terminated employees. We anticipate that travel expenses for the balance of this year will continue to decline due the same factors impacting the first nine months of this year. .

Rent expense is primarily for our location in Beverly Hills, California. Rent expense for the Beverly Hills office is approximately $10,996 per month. We have entered into a new lease for office space at 8383 Wilshire Boulevard, Beverly Hills, California. The new lease commenced on November 1, 2016 and expires March 31, 2019.

Marketing and selling expenses increased $ 19,417 (4.5%) from $ 433,863 in 2016 to $ 453,280 in 2017. Higher marketing and selling expenses were primarily due to higher sales commissions associated with higher sales revenue.

Consulting fees decreased $32,647 (40%$36,504 (19%) from $81,592$ 191,875 in 2016 to $48,945$155,371 in 2017. Our consulting fees vary based on needs. We engage consultants in the areas of sales, operations and accounting. FutureThe need for future consulting feesservices will be variable.variable

 

Director fees increased $12,500$81,296 from $25,000$75,000 in 2016 to $37,500$156,296 in 2017. The increase in director fees is due to thean increase in the number of ournon-employee directors. Annual director fees are anticipated at $50,000 per non-employee director.

 

Research and development expenses increased $ 46,033 (67%$191,053 (74%) from $68,568$256,874 in 2016 to $114,601$447,927 in 2017. During the third quarter of 2016 we re-classified certain personnel expenses that had previously been included in Personnel Expense, to Research and Development. These expenses relate to the services performed by our Director of Manufacturing and Product Development, and consultants supporting that employee. The re-classification is shown in both the current period and the prior period. The increase in Research and Development Expense is being driven by an increased need for research and development services, as we continue to expand product offerings, both for our standard SKU’s, and for National Accounts.Accounts, and experience increased commissioning costs at our third party production facility in Searcy, Arkansas.

 

Shipping and storage expense decreased $21,806 (25%increased $149,427 (47%) from $85,960$319,525 in 2016 to $64,154$468,952 in 2017. The higher expense in 2016 is due to costs incurred to better position inventory for the national roll-out with Sysco. Shipping and storage expense as a percentage of revenue decreasedwas 29% for 2017, and 24% for 2016 The higher expense in 2017 is due to 20%,a number of factors, including movement of inventory to new forward warehouses as compared with 31% in the prior quarter. This improvement results from the transition to more efficient shipping options that have become available as our operations have expanded.Company expanded its business into Canada, movement of sample inventory into position for trade shows and customer demonstrations, and special situation ordering of raw materials for production and R&D runs. We anticipate that shipping and storage expense as a percentage of sales will reduce during the balance of the year, as the Company is able to take advantage of more efficient distribution arrangements.

 

Other expenses consist of ordinary operating expenses such as investor relations, office, telephone, insurance, and stock related costs. We anticipate increases in certain of these expenses, as our business continues to grow.

 

We had operating losses of $2,359,040$6,602,816 and $2,486,222$7,340,363 for the nine month periods ended 2017 and 2016, respectively.

 

Interest expense decreased from $221,332$243,150 in 2016 to zero in 2017. Interest primarily relates to convertible debt that was issued in November, 2015, and converted into stock during February, 2016, and short term notes that were issued in December 2013, all of which were repaid prior to the current quarter.end of 2016.

 

We had net losses of $2,359,040 and $2,707,554$6,602,816and $7,583,513 in the nine month periods ended 2017 and 2016, respectively.

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

During the threenine months ended March 31,September 30, 2017 we used cash for operations of $ 1,614,825 and also5,224,812 , purchased equipment for $146,440.$412,865, and incurred spending for trademarks in the amount $27,684.

 

During the threenine months ended March 31,September 30, 2016 we used $1,612,451$5,590,671 of cash for operations, and used $421,131$985,315 for the purchase of equipment.

 

OurWe have a history of operating losses and negative cash flow. As our operations grow, we expect to date have been financed by the sale of securities, the issuance of convertible debt and the issuance of short-term debt, including related party advances. Our existing cash and otherexperience significant increases in our working capital may not be sufficientrequirements. These conditions raise substantial doubt over the Company’s ability to meet all of its obligations over the projected cash needs contemplatedtwelve months following the filing of this Form 10-Q. Management has evaluated these conditions, and concluded that current plans will alleviate this concern. We currently have no debt. In addition, we have significantly reduced core operating costs beginning in 2016, including reducing the number of our employees from 44 to 30 over this time period. In addition, we plan to address this concern by our business strategies. We intend to raiseraising additional capital through equitya loan or debt financing transactionsloans, and by continuing to address both our short term and longer term liquidity needs. However there can be no assurancesreduce core operating expenses as required. While these plans have not yet been implemented, management has concluded that weit is probable that they will be ableimplemented within one year of the issuance of the financial statements, and that they will mitigate the substantial doubt of our ability to continue as a going concern. However, the Company cannot predict, with certainty, the outcome of its action to generate liquidity, including the necessary capitalavailability of additional financing, or debt to carry out our current plan of operations.whether such actions would generate the expect liquidity as planned.

 

We lease office space under a non-cancelable operating lease, which expires March 31, 2019.

 

The aggregate minimum requirements under non-cancelable leases as of March 31,September 30, 2017 is $310,557.$248,537.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

 

We have no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that are material to stockholders.stockholders.

 

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

 

Not required because we are a smaller reporting company.

 

Item 4. Controls and Procedures.

 

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

 

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief AccountingFinancial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined under Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 Rules 13a-15(f). Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief AccountingFinancial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of March 31,September 30, 2017.

 

Management has identified the following material weaknessesweakness in our internal control over financial reporting:

 

We established an audit committee during the quarter ended June 30, 2015. We are not currently obligated to have an audit committee, including a member who is an “audit committee financial expert”, as defined in Item 407 of Regulation S-K, under applicable regulations or listing standards. It is management’s view that such a committee is an important internal control over financial reporting, the lack of which may result in ineffective oversight in the establishment and monitoring of internal control.
 Inadequate Segregation of Duties: We have an inadequate number of personnel to properly implement internal controlscontrol over financial reporting.

 

Since the assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting did identify material weaknesses, management considers its internal control over financial reporting to be ineffective.

 

Management believes that the material weakness set forth above did not have an effect on our financial results.

 

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

 

There have been no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the three months ended March 31, 2017thatSeptember 30, 2017 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

 

16 

 

PART II-OTHER INFORMATION

 

Item 1. Legal Proceedings.

 

Neither the Company nor its subsidiaries are party to or have property that is the subject of any material pending legal proceedings. We may be subject to ordinary legal proceedings incidental to our business from time to time that are not required to be disclosed

under this Item 1.

 

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

 

Not required because we are a smaller reporting company.

 

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

 

The Company did not issue or sell any other unregistered equity securities during the period covered by this report that were not previously reported on a Current Report on Form 8-K.

The foregoing issuances of securities were made in reliance on Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Act”) for transactions of an issuer not involving a public offering.

 

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

 

None.

 

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.

 

Not applicable.

 

Item 5. Other Information.

 

None.

 

Item 6. Exhibits.

 

Exhibit No. Description
   

31.1

 

Certification of Principal Executive Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith)

31.2 Certification of Principal Accounting Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith)
32.1 Certification of Principal Executive Officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith)
32.2 

Certification of Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith)

101.INS* XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH* XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL* XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF* XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB* XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE* XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

 

*XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language) information is furnished and not filed or a part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, is deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections.
  
In accordance with SEC Release 33-8238, Exhibits 32.1 and 32.2 are furnished and not filed.

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 

 BARFRESH FOOD GROUP INC.
   
Date: [___________],November 14, 2017By:/s/ Riccardo Delle Coste
  

Riccardo Delle Coste

Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)

   
Date: [___________],November 14, 2017By:/s/ Joseph S. Tesoriero
  Joseph S. Tesoriero
  

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)