UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

For the quarterly period ended SeptemberJune 30, 2017

OR2019

For the transition period from _______________________________ to _______________________________

Commission file number: 001-38420

VirTra, Inc.VIRTRA, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

(480) 968-1488

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)code:(480) 968-1488

N/A

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant:registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [  ] No [X]

Indicate by a check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive DateData File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes [X] No [  ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

If an emerging growth company, indicate by checkmarkcheck mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. [  ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes [  ] No [X]

As of March 30, 2018,August 13, 2019, the registrant had 7,904,3077,745,030 shares of common stock outstanding.

VIRTRA, Inc.INC.

FORM 10-Q

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PartPART I: FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ItemITEM 1. Financial StatementsFINANCIAL STATEMENTS

VIRTRA, INC.

CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS

(Unaudited)

See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed financial statements.

VIRTRA, INC.

CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited)

See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed financial statements.

VIRTRA, INC.

CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

(Unaudited)

See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed financial statements.

VIRTRA, INC.

CONDENSED STATEMENTSTATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITYCASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed financial statements.

VIRTRA, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed financial statements.

VIRTRA, INC.Note 1. Organization and Significant Accounting Policies

Notes To CONDENSED Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

NOTE 1.ORGANIZATION AND BUSINESS OPERATIONSOrganization and Business Operations

VirTra, Inc. (the “Company”“Company,” “VirTra,” “we,” “us” or “VirTra”“our”), located in Tempe, Arizona, is engaged in the sale and developmenta global provider of judgmental use of force training simulators, and firearms training simulators and driving simulators for the law enforcement, military, educational and commercial uses.markets. The Company’s patented technologies, software, and scenarios provide intense training for de-escalation, judgmental use-of-force, marksmanship and related training that mimics real-world situations. VirTra’s mission is to save and improve lives worldwide through practical and highly-effective virtual reality and simulator technology. The Company sells simulators and relatedits products worldwide through a direct sales force and international distribution partners. The original business started in 1993 as Ferris Productions, Inc. In September 2001, Ferris Productions, Inc. merged with GameCom, Inc. to ultimately become VirTra, Systems, Inc., a TexasNevada corporation.

Effective as of October 1, 2016 (the “Effective Date”), the Company completed a conversion from a Texas corporation to a Nevada corporation pursuant to a Redomestication Plan of Conversion (the “Plan of Conversion”) that was approved by the Company’s Board of Directors on June 23, 2016 and its shareholders on September 16, 2016. On the Effective Date, 7,927,688 shares of common stock of VirTra Systems, Inc., a Texas corporation, were converted into 7,927,688 shares of common stock of VirTra, Inc., a Nevada corporation. No shareholders exercised appraisal rights or dissenters’ rights for such shares in accordance with the Texas Business Organization Code.

As part of the Plan of Conversion, the Company filed Articles of Incorporation in Nevada whereby it changed its name from VirTra Systems, Inc. to VirTra, Inc. and revised its capitalization. The Company’s Articles of Incorporation filed in Nevada authorized the Company to issue 62,500,000 shares, of which (1) 60,000,000 shares shall be common stock, par value $0.0001 per share (the “common stock”), of which (a) 50,000,000 shares shall be common stock, par value $0.0001, (b) 2,500,000 shares shall be Class A common stock, par value $0.0001 per share (the “Class A common stock”), and (c) 7,500,000 shares shall be Class B common stock, par value $0.0001 per share (the “Class B common stock”) and (2) 2,500,000 shares shall be Preferred Stock, par value $0.0001 per share, which may, at the sole discretion of the Board of Directors be issued in one or more series (the “Preferred Stock”). The Company also adopted new bylaws as part of the Plan of Conversion.

Effective October 20, 2016,March 2, 2018, the Company effected a 1 for 101-for-2 reverse stock split of its issued and outstanding Common Stock and effective February 12, the Company effected a 1 for 2 reversecommon stock split of its issued and outstanding Common Stock (together the(the “Reverse Stock Splits”Split”). All references to shares of the Company’s common stock in this report refer to the number of shares of common stock after giving effect to the Reverse Stock Splits.Split.

The Company’s corporate office is located in Tempe, Arizona. All transactions in the financial statements and accompanying notes are presented in US Dollars.

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited condensed financial statements included herein have been prepared by us without audit pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and should be read in conjunction with our audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2018. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for interim financial information. Certain information and note disclosures normally included in complete annual financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been condensed or omitted. However,omitted as permitted by the Company believes thatSEC, although we believe the disclosures included in these unaudited condensed financial statementsthat are made are adequate to make the information presented herein not misleading. In the opinion of management, the

The accompanying unaudited condensed financial statements reflect, in our opinion, all adjustments, which include normal recurring adjustments considered necessary to present fairly our financial position at June 30, 2019 and the results of our operations and cash flows for a fair presentationthe periods presented. We derived the December 31, 2018 condensed balance sheet data from audited financial statements; however, we did not include all disclosures required by GAAP.

Interim results are subject to seasonal variations, and the results of such interim results. The resultsoperations for the three and ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172019 are not necessarily indicative of the results for any subsequent period. These unaudited condensed financial statements shouldto be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and notesexpected for the year ended December 31, 2016 included in the Company’s Post-Qualification Offering Circular Amendment No. 1 to Form 1-A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on February 21, 2018.

Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform with current period presentation. These reclassifications have no impact on net income/(loss).full year.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities atas of the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates. Significant accounting estimates in these financial statements include valuation assumptions for share-based payments, allowance for doubtful accounts and notes receivable, inventory reserves, accrual for warranty reserves, the carrying value of long-lived assets and intangible assets, income tax valuation allowances, the carrying value of cost basis investments, and the allocation of the transaction price to the performance obligations in our contracts with customers.

Recent Accounting PronouncementsReclassifications

Between May 2014 and December 2016,Certain reclassifications have been made to the Financial2018 financial statements to conform to the 2019 financial statement presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on net earnings or cash flows as previously reported.

Revenue Recognition

The Company adopted Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”Codification (“ASC”) issued several Accounting Standard Updates (“ASUs”) on606, Revenue from Contracts with CustomersCustomer (Topic 606). These updates will supersede nearly all existing revenue recognition guidance under current GAAP. The core principle is (“ASC 606”) on January 1, 2018 and the Company elected to recognize revenues when promised goods or services are transferred to customers in an amount that reflectsuse the consideration tomodified retrospective transition method which an entity expects to be entitled for those goods or services. A five-step process has been defined to achieve this core principle, and, in doing so, more judgment and estimates may be required within the revenue recognition process than are required under existing GAAP. The standards are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods therein, using either of the following transition methods: (i) a full retrospective approach reflecting therequires application of the standards in each prior reporting period with the optionASC 606 to elect certain practical expedients, or (ii) a retrospective approach with the cumulative effect of initially adopting the standards recognizeduncompleted contracts at the date of adoption (which includes additional footnote disclosures).adoption. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of its pending adoption of these standards on its financial statements and expects to adopt the modified retrospective approach. However, the adoption of these new standards will not have a material impact on its revenue recognition as it pertains to current revenue streams, the Company’s financial position or results of operations

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02 – “Leases (Topic 842)”, which requires leases to put most leases on their balance sheets by recognizing lease assets and lease liabilities for those leases classified as operating leases under previous guidance. This ASU will be effective for the Company on January 1, 2019, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently in the process of assessing the impact of this ASU on its financial statements.

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, Financial Instruments - Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (“ASU 2016-01”), which requires that equity investments, except for those accounted for under the equity method or those that result in consolidation of the investee, be measured at fair value, with subsequent changes in fair value recognized in net income. However, an entity may choose to measure equity investments that do not have readily determinable fair values at cost minus impairment, if any, plus or minus changes resulting from observable price changes in orderly transactions for the identical or a similar investment of the same issuer. ASU 2016-01 also impacts the presentation and disclosure requirements for financial instruments. ASU 2016-01 is effective for public business entities for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted only for certain provisions. As the Company wrote-down its Investment in Modern Round to fair value in 2017, the Company believes that the adoption of ASU 2016-01 will not have a material impact on its financial statements, however, the Company will change from the cost method of accounting.

In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-11 – “Inventory (Topic 330): Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory”. The amendment’s purpose is to simplify the measurement, reduce costs and increase comparability for inventory measured using first-in, first-out (FIFO) or average cost methods. An entity should measure inventory within the scope of this ASU at the lower of cost and net realizable value, which is the estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal and transportation. This accounting guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within those fiscal years. This standard was adopted on January 1, 2017 and its adoption did not to have a material significant impact on the Company’s financial statement position and results of operations.

In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-17 – “Income Taxes (Topic 740): Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes”. The ASU’s purpose is to require deferred tax liabilities and assets be classified as noncurrent in a classified statement of financial position (Balance Sheet). This accounting guidance will become effective beginning in the first quarter of 2017. Early application is permitted. The Company adopted this pronouncement and such adoptionASC 606 did not have a material impact on the financial statements.

Under ASC 606, the Company must identify the contract with a customer, identify the performance obligations in the contract, determine the transaction price, allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract, and recognize revenue when (or as) the Company satisfies a performance obligation. Significant judgment is necessary when making these determinations.

The Company’s primary sources of revenue are derived from simulator and accessories sales, training and installation, the sale of customizable software and the sale of extended service-type warranties. Sales discounts are presented in the financial statements as reductions in determining net revenues. Credit sales are recorded as current assets (accounts receivable). Prepaid deposits received at the time of sale and extended warranties purchased are recorded as current and long-term liabilities (deferred revenue) until earned. The following briefly summarizes the nature of our performance obligations and method of revenue recognition:

The Company recognizes revenue upon transfer of control or upon completion of the services for the simulator and accessories; for the installation and training and customized software performance obligations as the customer has the right and ability to direct the use of these products and services and the customer obtains substantially all of the remaining benefit from these products and services at that time. Revenue from certain customized content contracts may be recognized over the period the services are performed based on the terms of the contract. For the sales-based royalty exchanged for license of intellectual property, the Company recognized revenue as the sales occur over time.

The Company recognizes revenue on a straight-line basis over the period of services being rendered for the extended service-type warranties as these warranties represent a performance obligation to “stand ready to perform” over the duration of the warranties. As such, the warranty service is performed continuously over the warranty period.

Each contract states the transaction price. The contracts do not include variable consideration, significant financing components or noncash consideration. The Company has elected to exclude sales and similar taxes from the measurement of the transaction price. The contract’s transaction price is allocated to the performance obligations based upon their stand-alone selling prices. Discounts to the stand-alone selling prices, if any, are allocated proportionately to each performance obligation.

Disaggregation of Revenue

Under ASC 606, disaggregated revenue from contracts with customers depicts the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows affected by economic factors. The Company has evaluated revenues recognized and the following table illustrates the disaggregation disclosure by customer’s location and performance obligation.

Customer Deposits

Customer deposits are recorded as a current liability under deferred revenue on the accompanying balance sheets and totaled $827,475 and $186,450 as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively. Changes in deferred revenue amounts related disclosures.to customer deposits will fluctuate from year to year based upon the mix of customers required to prepay deposits under the Company’s credit policy. Customer deposits are considered a deferred liability until completion of the customer’s contract performance obligations. When revenue is recognized, the deposit is applied to the customer’s receivable balance.

Warranty

The Company warranties its products from manufacturing defects on a limited basis for a period of one year after purchase, but also sells separately priced extended service-type warranties for periods of up to four years after the expiration of the standard one-year warranty. During the term of the initial one-year warranty, if the device fails to operate properly from defects in materials and workmanship, the Company will fix or replace the defective product. Deferred revenue for separately priced extended warranties one year or less totaled $1,726,415 and $1,604,637 as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively. Deferred revenue for separately priced extended warranties longer than one year totaled $1,188,196 and $962,356 as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively. The accrual for the one-year manufacturer’s warranty liability totaled $185,017 and $200,505 as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively. During the three months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, the Company recognized revenue of $548,631 and $534,151, respectively, related to the extended service-type warranties that was amortized from the deferred revenue balance. During the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, the Company recognized revenue of $1,059,104 and $1,023,221, respectively, related to the extended service-type warranties that was amortized from the deferred revenue balance. Changes in deferred revenue amounts related to extended service-type warranties will fluctuate from year to year based upon the average remaining life of the warranties at the beginning of the period and new extended service-type warranties sold during the period.

Customer Retainage

Customer retainage is recorded as a current liability under deferred revenue on the accompanying balance sheet and totaled $133,220 as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018. Changes in deferred revenue amounts related to customer retainage will fluctuate from year to year based upon the customer’s contract completion date allowing the Company to invoice and be paid the retainage.

Licensing and Royalties with Related Party

As discussed further in Note 8. Collaboration Agreement with Related Party, the Company licenses intellectual property to Modern Round, LLC (“MR”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of That’s Eatertainment Corp. (“TEC”), a related party, in exchange for sales-based royalties. Revenues from this agreement are recognized in accordance with the terms of the contract as the sales occur. The Company receives additional immaterial sales-based royalties from strategic partners.

Adoption of New Accounting Standards

In February 2016, the FASBFinancial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) ASU No. 2016-02, – “Leases (Topic 842)”, which and subsequent amendments to the initial guidance: ASU 2018-10, ASU 2018-11, ASU 2018-20 and ASU 2019-01 (collectively, “Topic 842”). Topic 842 requires leasesan entity to put most leases on their balance sheets by recognizing lease assetsrecognize a right-of-use asset (“ROU”) and lease liabilitiesliability for thoseall leases classifiedand provide enhanced disclosures. Recognition, measurement, and presentation of expenses depends on classification as a finance lease or an operating leases under previous guidance. This ASU will be effective for the Company onlease. On January 1, 2019, with early adoption permitted.the Company adopted Topic 842 using the modified retrospective approach. Results for reporting periods after January 1, 2019 are presented under Topic 842, while prior periods have not been adjusted. The Company is currently inelected the processpackage of assessingpractical expedients permitted under the impact of this ASU on its financial statements.

In November 2016,transition guidance within the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force), to provide guidance on the presentation of restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents in the statement of cash flow. The amendments should be applied using a retrospective transition method, and are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The adoption of this statement is not expected to have an impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-03, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections (Topic 250). The ASU adds SEC disclosure requirements for both the quantitative and qualitative impacts that certain recently issued accounting standards will have on the financial statements of a registrant when such standards are adopted in a future period. Specially, these disclosure requirements apply to the adoption of ASU No. 2014- 09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606); ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842); and ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments. As indicated below,new standard, which among other things, allowed the Company does not believe thatto carry forward the adoption of ASU No. 2014-09 will have a material impact on its revenue recognition as it pertainshistorical lease classification. Refer to current revenue streams.Note 6 - Leases.

In February 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-05, Other Income—Gains and Losses from the Derecognition of Nonfinancial Assets (Subtopic 610-20): Clarifying the Scope of Asset Derecognition Guidance and Accounting for Partial Sales of Nonfinancial Assets, to clarify the scope of Subtopic 610-20, Other Income—Gains and Losses from the Derecognition of Nonfinancial Assets, and to add guidance for partial sales of nonfinancial assets. Subtopic 610-20, which was issued in May 2014 as a part of ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), provides guidance for recognizing gains and losses from the transfer of nonfinancial assets in contracts with noncustomers. The amendments are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years, which is the same time as the amendments in ASU No. 2014-09, and early adoption is permitted. The Company does not expect this amendment to have a material impact on its financial statements.

In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-09, Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting, to provide clarity and reduce both (1) diversity in practice and (2) cost and complexity when applying the guidance in Topic 718, Compensation—Stock Compensation, to a change to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award. The ASU provides guidance about which changes to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award require an entity to apply modification accounting in Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 718. The amendments are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and should be applied prospectively to an award modified on or after the adoption date. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. The Company does not expect this amendment to have a material impact on its financial statements.

In July 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-11 – “Earnings Per Share (Topic 260); Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity (Topic 480); Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815)” I. Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Down Round Features and II. ReplacementPart I of the Indefinite Deferral for Mandatorily Redeemable Financial Instruments of Certain Nonpublic Entities and Certain Mandatorily Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests with a Scope Exception. Part IASU No. 2017-11 applies to entities that issue financial instruments such as warrants, convertible debt or convertible preferred stock that contain down round features. Part II simply replaces the indefinite deferral for certain mandatorily redeemable noncontrolling interests and mandatorily redeemable financial instruments of nonpublic entities contained within ASC Topic 480 with a scope exception and does not impact the accounting for these mandatorily redeemable instruments. This ASU is effective for public companies for the annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those annual periods. Early adoption is permitted. ASU No. 2017-11 did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In June 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-07, “Compensation–Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Nonemployee Share-Based Payment Accounting” to simplify the accounting for nonemployee share-based payment transactions resulting from expanding the scope of Topic 718, to include share-based payment transactions for acquiring goods and services from nonemployees. The amendments also clarify that Topic 718 does not apply to share-based payments used to effectively provide (1) financing to the issuer or (2) awards granted in conjunction with selling goods or services to customers as part of a contract accounted for under Topic 606, Revenue from Contract with Customers. The amendments are effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within that fiscal year, with early adoption permitted. ASU No. 2018-07 did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

Fair Value Measurements

ASC Topic 820,Fair Value Measurements, defines fair value as the price that would be received in the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Topic 820 also specifies a fair value hierarchy that requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The standard describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value as follows:

Level 1: Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;

Level 2: Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities; and

Level 3: Valuation is generated from model-based techniques that use significant assumptions not observable in the market. These unobservable assumptions reflect our own estimate of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company’s financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, certificates of deposit, accounts receivable, notes and interest receivables, accounts payable, and accrued liabilities. The fair value of financial instruments, except for long-term notes receivable, approximates their carrying values, using level 3 inputs, at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018 due to their short maturities. The fair value of the long-term notes receivable approximates its carrying value, using level 3 inputs, at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018 based on borrowing rates currently available for loans with similar terms and maturities.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of 90 days or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents.

Certificates of Deposit and Mutual Funds

The Company invests its excess cash in certificates of deposit and money market mutual funds issued by financial institutions with high credit ratings. The certificates of deposit generally have average maturities of approximately six months and are subject to penalties for early withdrawal. The money market mutual funds are open ended and can be withdrawn at any time without penalty.

Accounts and Notes Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

The Company recognizes an allowance for losses on accounts receivable based on an analysis of historical bad debt experience, current receivables aging, and expected future write-offs, as well as an assessment of specific identifiable customer accounts considered at risk or uncollectible. Accounts receivable do not bear interest and are charged off after all reasonable collection efforts have been taken. As of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the Company maintained an allowance for doubtful accounts of $25,413 and $23,044, respectively.

Notes receivable are carried at their estimated collectible amounts. Interest income on notes receivable is recognized using the effective interest method. Notes receivable are periodically evaluated for collectability based on the credit history and the current financial condition of the counter party, and the known and inherent risks in the notes. Notes receivable are placed on nonaccrual status when they become 90 days past due and the customer has not made a payment in over 60 days. Upon suspension of the accrual of interest, interest income is subsequently recognized to the extent cash payments are received. Accrual of interest is resumed when notes are removed from non-accrual status. Notes receivable are charged against the allowance for credit losses when they are deemed to be uncollectible. As of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the allowance for uncollectible notes receivable was $369,286 and $266,813, respectively.

Inventory

Inventory is stated at the lower of cost or net realizable value with cost being determined on the average cost method. Work in progress and finished goods inventory includes an allocation for capitalized labor and overhead. The Company routinely evaluates the carrying value of inventory for slow moving and potentially obsolete inventory and, when appropriate, will record an adjustment to reduce inventory to its estimated net realizable value. As of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, inventory reserves were $105,031.

Investments in Other Companies

Minority investments in other companies are accounted for under the cost method of accounting because the Company does not expect this amendmenthave the ability to exercise significant influence over the other companies’ operations. Under the cost method of accounting, investments in private companies are carried at cost and are only adjusted for other-than-temporary declines in fair value and distribution of earnings. For investments in public companies that have readily determinable fair values, the Company classifies its investments as available-for-sale, and accordingly records these investments at their fair values with unrealized gains and losses included as a separate component of stockholders’ equity and in total comprehensive income (loss). Upon sale or liquidation, realized gains and losses are included in the statements of operations.

The adoption of ASU 2016-01 requires investments in other companies that do not have readily determinable fair value be accounted for at cost minus impairment, if any, plus or minus changes resulting from observable price changes in orderly transactions for the identical or a similar investment of the same issuer. This standard was adopted on January 1, 2018, including all interim reporting periods within the fiscal year. The adoption of ASU 2016-01 did not have a material impact on the financial statements. Upon adoption, the Company has elected to utilize the cost minus impairment approach because the investment in TEC does not have a readily determinable fair value as of the reporting date. See Note 8. Collaboration Agreement with Related Party.

Management regularly evaluates the recoverability of its investment based on the investee company’s performance and financial position. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2019, the Company did not recognize any impairment loss. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, the Company recognized an impairment loss of $134,140. Management regularly assesses the classification of its investments.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are carried at cost, net of depreciation. Gains or losses related to retirements or disposition of fixed assets are recognized in operations in the period incurred. Costs of normal repairs and maintenance are charged to expense as incurred, while betterments or renewals are capitalized. Depreciation commences at the time the assets are placed in service. Depreciation is provided using the straight-line method over the estimated economic lives of the assets or for leasehold improvements, over the shorter of the estimated useful life or the remaining lease term, which are summarized as follows:

Intangible Assets

Intangible assets at June 30, 2019 are comprised of various patents. We compute amortization expense on the intangible assets using the straight-line method over the estimate remaining useful lives of 18 years.

Cost of Products Sold

Cost of products sold represents manufacturing costs, consisting of materials, labor and overhead related to finished goods and components. Cost of products sold does not include depreciation of fixed assets. Shipping costs incurred related to product delivery are included in cost of products sold.

Advertising Costs

Costs associated with advertising are expensed as incurred. Advertising expense was $150,977 and $160,643 for the three months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Advertising expense was $270,380 and $300,025 for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively. These costs include domestic and international tradeshows, website, and sales promotional materials.

Research and Development Costs

Research and development costs are expensed as incurred. Research and development costs primarily include expenses, including labor, directly related to research and development support. Research and development costs were $353,665 and $305,738 for the three months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Research and development costs were $709,306 and $673,282 for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively

Legal Costs

Legal costs relating to loss contingencies are expensed as incurred. See Note 10.

Concentration of Credit Risk and Major Customers and Suppliers

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist of cash and cash equivalents, certificates of deposit, accounts receivable and notes receivable.

The Company’s cash, cash equivalents and certificates of deposit are maintained with financial institutions with high credit standings and are FDIC insured deposits. The FDIC insures deposits according to the ownership category in which the funds are insured and how the accounts are titled. The standard deposit insurance coverage limit is $250,000 per depositor, per FDIC-insured bank, per ownership category. The Company had uninsured cash and cash equivalents of $1,119,590 and $2,014,987 as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively.

Sales are typically made on credit and the Company generally does not require collateral. Management performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers’ financial condition and maintains an allowance for estimated losses. Historically, the Company has experienced minimal charges relative to doubtful accounts.

The Company’s notes receivable are due from one trade customer and one related party, both are unsecured. Management performs ongoing evaluations of the collectability of its notes receivable and maintains an allowance for estimated losses.

Historically, the Company primarily sells its products to United States federal and state agencies. For the three months ended June 30, 2019, two federal agencies comprised 32% of total net sales and one tribal government comprised 10% of total net sales. By comparison, for the three months ended June 30, 2018, one federal agency comprised 53% of total net sales. For the six months ended June 30, 2019, two federal agencies comprised 25% of total net sales. By comparison, for the six months ended June 30, 2018, one federal agency comprised 39% of total net sales and one commercial customer comprised 11% of total net sales.

As of June 30, 2019, three federal agencies comprised 55% of total accounts receivables and one state agency comprised 11% of total accounts receivables. By comparison, as of December 31, 2018, one federal agency comprised 26% of total accounts receivables and one state agency comprised 20% of total accounts receivables.

Income Taxes

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded based on the difference between the financial statement and the tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. The Company calculates a provision for income taxes using the asset and liability method, under which deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized by identifying the temporary differences arising from the different treatment of items for tax and accounting purposes. In determining the future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in the financial statements or tax returns, judgment and interpretation of statutes are required.

In assessing realizable deferred tax assets, management assesses the likelihood that deferred tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income, and to the extent that recovery is not likely or there is insufficient operating history, a valuation allowance is established. The Company adjusts the valuation allowance in the period management determines it is more likely than not that net deferred tax assets will or will not be realized. After review of the deferred tax asset and valuation allowance in accordance with ASC 740, management determined that it is more likely than not that the Company will fully realize all of its deferred tax asset and no valuation allowance was needed as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018.

As of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the Company did not recognize any assets or liabilities relative to uncertain tax positions. Interest or penalties, if any, will be recognized in income tax expense. Since there are no significant unrecognized tax benefits as a result of tax positions taken, there are no accrued penalties or interest. Tax positions are positions taken in a previously filed tax return or positions expected to be taken in a future tax return that are reflected in measuring current or deferred income tax assets and liabilities reported in the financial statements.

The Company reflects tax benefits, only if it is more likely than not that the Company will be able to sustain the tax return position, based on its technical merits. If a tax benefit meets this criterion, it is measured and recognized based on the largest amount of benefit that is cumulatively greater than 50% likely to be realized. Management does not believe that there are any uncertain tax positions at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018.

The Company is potentially subject to tax audits for its United States federal and various state income and excise tax returns for tax years between 2014 and 2019; however, earlier years may be subject to audit under certain circumstances. Tax audits by their very nature are often complex and can require several years to complete.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and Intangible Assets

Long lived assets, such as equipment, and intangible assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized by the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset. Fair value is determined based on discounted cash flows or appraised values, depending on the nature of the asset. At June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the Company concluded that there has been no indication of impairment to the carrying value of its long-lived assets. As such, no impairment has been recorded.

Stock Based Compensation

The Company measures the cost of awards of equity instruments based on the grant date fair value of the awards. The Company calculates the fair value of stock-based awards using the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing valuation model, which incorporates various assumptions including volatility, expected term and risk-free interest rates. There were no grants of stock-based awards during the three and six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018.

The expected term of the options is the estimated period of time until exercise and was determined using the SEC’s safe harbor rules, using an average of vesting and contractual terms, as we did not have sufficient historical experience of similar awards. The risk-free interest rate is based on the implied yield available on United States Treasury zero-coupon issues with an equivalent remaining term. The Company has not paid dividends in the past and does not plan to pay any dividends in the near future. The estimated fair value of stock-based compensation awards and other options is amortized to expense on a straight-line basis over the relevant vesting period. As share-based compensation expense recognized is based on awards ultimately expected to vest, it is reduced for estimated forfeitures. The Company has elected to recognize forfeitures as they occur rather than estimating them at the time of grant.

New Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326), and also issued subsequent amendments to the initial guidance under ASU 2018-19, ASU 2019-04 and ASU 2019-05 which provides guidance on measuring credit losses on financial instruments. The amended guidance replaces current incurred loss impairment methodology of recognizing credit losses when a loss is probable with a methodology that reflects expected credit losses and requires a broader range of reasonable and supportable information to assess credit loss estimates. ASU 2016-13 and the subsequent amendments are effective for us on January 1, 2020, with early adoption permitted on January 1, 2019. The Company is assessing what effect the provisions of 2016-13 and the subsequent amendments will have on the financial statements.

In November 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-18, Collaborative Arrangements (Topic 808): Clarifying the Interaction between Topic 808 and Topic 606, which clarifies that certain transactions between participants in a collaborative arrangement should be accounted for under ASC 606 when the counterparty is a customer. In addition, Topic 808 precludes an entity from presenting consideration from a transaction in a collaborative arrangement as revenue from contracts with customers if the counterparty is not a customer for that transaction. This guidance will be effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2020. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of 2018-18 on its financial statements.

NOTENote 2. INVENTORYNotes Receivable

An unsecured promissory note was executed on March 23, 2018 by a customer converting its past-due trade receivable from the sale of goods and services in the amount of $400,906. This unsecured promissory note is due in full on or before February 2020. The note bears interest at the rate of ten percent (10%) per annum and requires installment payments of $20,000 principal and interest. Payments are due monthly and include late fees. The principal and accrued interest due as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018 was $369,286 and $374,034, respectively. The note is currently in default, repayment has been demanded and the Company is pursuing legal remedy, see Note 10. Based on collection history, interest accrual has been suspended as of the last payment received in February 2019. At June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the Company recorded an allowance against the note receivable balance in the amount of $369,286 and $266,813, respectively.

The Company accepted an unsecured convertible promissory note (the “Convertible Note”) from TEC, a related party, in the amount of $292,138 for a portion of their minimum royalty payment due as of May 31, 2018. The note bears interest at the rate of five percent (5%) per annum and contains a provision requiring remittance of not less than 20% of the net proceeds of any private or public offering of its securities in reduction of the Convertible Note. The note has a conversion right, at the sole discretion of the Company, to convert the outstanding balance of principal and accrued interest at any time for shares of common stock of TEC. Prior to the due date, the Company may elect to convert the Convertible Note for shares of common stock in TEC at a twenty-five percent (25%) discount to the price of shares sold to the public in a public offering in connection with a go-public transaction. The issuance of common stock upon conversion shall be made without charge to the Company. No fractional shares shall be issued upon conversion and in lieu of fractional shares, TEC will pay the Company the amount of any obligation that is not converted. Any unpaid balance of principal and accrued interest becomes due and collectible on the earlier of (i) August 1, 2019 (maturity date), or (ii) if declared due and payable in the event of Default. The note principal and accrued interest due as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018 was $305,528 and $298,224, respectively. No reserve for collectability has been recorded as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018. The notes maturity date was extended in July 2019, all other terms remain unchanged, see Note 8 and Note 12.

Note 3. Inventory

Inventory consisted of the following as of:

During 2018, the Company evaluated the useful life of its spare parts inventory. As a result of this evaluation, the Company classified $372,566 and $292,298 of spare parts as Other Assets, long-term on the Balance Sheet at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively.

NOTE 3.Note 4. Property and Equipment

Property and equipment consisted of the following as of:

Depreciation expense was $65,570$71,197 and $64,591$74,587 for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172019 and 2016,2018, respectively. Depreciation expense was $204,527$141,509 and $160,768$143,206 for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172019 and 2016,2018, respectively.

Note 5. Intangible Asset

Intangible asset consisted of the following as of:

Amortization expense was $2,223 and $0 for the three months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Amortization expense was $3,704 and $0 for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

Note 6. Leases

The Company leases approximately 37,729 rentable square feet of office and warehouse space from an unaffiliated third party for our corporate office, manufacturing, assembly, warehouse and shipping facility located at 7970 South Kyrene Road, Tempe, Arizona 85284. From 2016 through March 2019, the Company leased approximately 4,529 rentable square feet of office and industrial space from an unaffiliated third party for our machine shop at 2169 East 5th St., Tempe, Arizona 85284. In April 2019, the Company relocated the machine shop from the Fifth St. location to 7910 South Kyrene Road, located within the same business complex as our main office. The Company executed a lease amendment to add an additional 5,131 rentable square feet for the machine shop and extended its existing office lease through April 2024. The Company’s lease agreements do not contain any residual value guarantees, restrictive covenants or variable lease payments. The Company has not entered into any financing leases.

In addition to base rent, the Company’s lease generally provides for additional payments for other charges, such as rental tax. The lease includes fixed rent escalations. The Company’s lease does not include an option to renew.

The Company determines if an arrangement is a lease at inception. Operating leases are recorded in operating lease right of use assets, net, operating lease liability – short term, and operating lease liability – long-term on its condensed balance sheet.

Operating lease assets represent the Company’s right to use an underlying asset for the lease term and lease liabilities represent its obligation to make lease payments arising from the lease. Operating lease assets and liabilities are recognized at the commencement date based on the present value of lease payments over the lease term. As the Company’s leases do not provide an implicit rate, the Company uses its incremental borrowing rate based on the information available at commencement date in determining the present value of lease payments. The incremental borrowing rate used at adoption was 4.5%. Significant judgement is required when determining the Company’s incremental borrowing rate. The Company uses the implicit rate when readily determinable. Lease expense for lease payments are recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term.

Effective January 1, 2019, the Company obtained a right-of-use asset in exchange for a new operating lease liability in the amount of $1,721,380 and derecognized $46,523 deferred rent for an adjusted operating lease right-of-use asset in the net amount of $1,674,857.

The balance sheet classification of lease assets and liabilities was as follows:

Future minimum lease payments as of June 30, 2019 under non-cancelable operating leases are as follows:

The Company had a deferred rent liability of $0 and $46,523 as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively, relative to the increasing future minimum lease payments. Rent expense for the three months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 was $76,967 and $125,491, respectively. Rent expense for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 was $165,934 and $125,491, respectively.

NOTE 4.Note 7. Accrued Expenses

Accrued compensation and related costs consisted of the following as of:

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities consisted of the following as of:

Profit Sharing

As part of the benefit package maintained by the Company, the Profit Sharing program pays a percentage of Company annual profits as a cash bonus to active and eligible employees. The cash payment is typically split into two equal payments and distributed pro-rata to employees in April and October of the following year. For the nine months ending September 30, 2017 and 2016, the percentage of annual net profit used for estimating the calculations was 15%. Profit sharing expense was $113,976 and $(3,379) for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Profit sharing expense was $403,709 and $325,678 for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

NOTE 5.Note 8. Collaboration Agreement with Related Party

On January 16, 2015, the Company entered into a Co-Venture Agreement (the “Co-Venture Agreement”) with Modern Round, LLC (“Modern Round”),MR, a wholly ownedwholly-owned subsidiary of Modern Round Entertainment Corporation (“MREC”),TEC, a related party. MREC is a restaurant and entertainment concept centered on its indoor virtual reality shooting experience. The Co-Venture Agreement provides Modern Round access to certain software and equipment relating to the Company’s products in exchange for royalties.

The Company received 1,365,789 units, representing a 5% ownership interest in Modern Round on the date of the Co-Venture Agreement. The Company recorded the investment at the estimated fair value of the units and which were valued at $0.10 per unit based on Modern Round’s other membership unit sales.The Co-Venture Agreement also provides the Company with conditional warrants to purchase an additional 5% of Modern Round as of the date of that agreement, at an exercise price of $0.25.

On April 14, 2015, Modern Round issued the Company an option to purchase 125,000 units of Modern Round. The option fully vested and became exercisable on the date of grant at an exercise price equal to $0.50 per unit and terminates on the tenth anniversary of the date of grant, if not earlier pursuant to the terms of the option.

On December 31, 2015, Modern Round merged with a subsidiary of MREC pursuant to a Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) andeach unit of Modern Round issued and outstanding as of the effective time of the merger automatically converted into the right to receive approximately 1.2277 shares of MREC common stock. As a result of the Merger Agreement, the Company held 1,676,748 shares of MREC common stock, options to purchase 153,459 shares of MREC common stock at an exercise price of $0.41 per share, and conditional warrants to purchase 1,676,747 shares of MREC common stock at an exercise price of $0.20 per share.

On October 25, 2016, the Company exercised the conditional warrant and purchased 1,676,747 shares of MREC common stock for $335,349, resulting in the Company’s aggregate holdings of MREC increasing to3,353,495 common shares representing approximately 8.9% of the issued and outstanding common shares of MREC. The MREC equity securities have been recorded as a cost method investment as the Company does not have the ability to exercise significant influence over MREC.

As part of the Co-Venture Agreement, the Company granted 459,691 conditional warrants to affiliates of MREC to purchase 5% of the Company’s capital stock on a fully diluted basis as of the date of the Co-Venture Agreement. The conditional warrants are exercisable commencing at the earlier of the first anniversary of MREC opening its first range facility utilizing VirTra technology or after MREC opening its first range facility utilizing VirTra technology and the payment to the Company of all required US/Canada minimum royalty payments during the first 12-month period. MREC opened its first location on June 1, 2016.

The Company also granted 459,691 of additional conditional warrants to affiliates of MREC to purchase another 5% of the Company’s capital stock on a fully diluted basis as of the Agreement date. These conditional warrants are exercisable any time subsequent to MREC’s payment of $2.0 million in cumulative license fees (royalty). Both conditional warrant issuances are for a period of five years with an exercise price of $2.72.

These conditional warrants were considered contingent consideration for the equity investment as they did not meet the definition of a derivative under ASC 815. Thus, the contingent consideration was not included in the cost of the equity investment until the contingency was resolved and the warrant became exercisable.

On June 1, 2017, the warrants related to the opening of the facility vested and became exercisable at an exercise price equal to $2.72 per unit and terminate on the fifth anniversary of the date of vesting, if not earlier pursuant to the terms of the option. On June 1, 2017, these warrants were recorded at the Black-Scholes Merton fair value using annual volatility of 91.5%, an annual risk free rate of 1.76%, expected term of five years and a fair value of $4.28 a share for a fair value of $1,516,246 as an additional investment in MREC.

The Co-Venture Agreement grants MRECTEC an exclusive non-transferrable license to use the Company’s technology and certain equipment solely for use at locations to operate the concept, as defined in the Co-Venture Agreement. The license would become non-exclusive if the first U.S. location is not opened within 24 months of the effective date and at least one location is opened outside the U.S. and Canada within five years of the Co-Venture Agreement date, the respective milestone dates. Throughout the duration of the Co-Venture Agreement, MRECTEC will pay the Company a royalty based on gross revenue, as defined and subject to certain minimum royalties commencing with the first twelve-month period subsequent to the respective milestone date of June 1, 2017. IfUnder the terms of the original agreement, if the total royalty payments for locations in the United States and Canada together do not total at least the minimum royalty amountamount specified in the agreement, MRECTEC may pay to VirTra the difference between the amount of total royalty payments and the minimum specified in the agreement to maintain exclusivity.

On August 16, 2017, the Company entered into the first amendment to the Co-Venture Agreement to permit TEC to sublicense the VirTra technology to third party operators of stand-alone location-based entertainment companies. TEC agreed to pay the Company royalties for any such sublicenses in an amount equal to 10% of the revenue paid to TEC in cases where TEC pays for the cost of the equipment for such location or 14% of the revenue paid to TEC in cases where it does not pay for the cost of the equipment.

In April 2018, MR effected a 1-for-12,000 reverse stock split, followed by a 2,000-for-1 forward stock split completed in November 2018. As a result, the Company holds, as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, 560,000 shares of TEC common stock representing approximately 5.8% of the issued and outstanding common shares of TEC. The Company recognized $245,082recorded its investment at cost minus impairment as of June 30, 2019 and $47,829 for license fees (royalties)December 31, 2018, at $1,120,000.

On July 23, 2018, the Company entered into the second amendment to the Co-Venture Agreement with TEC to (i) confirm the minimum royalty deficiency benefit due for the nineroyalty period ended May 31, 2018; (ii) establish payment terms for the minimum royalty deficiency benefit due, to include both cash and promissory note payment; (iii) clarify the exclusivity provisions of the Co-Venture Agreement; and (iv) amend the minimum royalty calculations to only TEC branded facilities. For the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172019 and 2016, respectively.2018, respectively, the Company recognized license fee income (royalties) from TEC of $32,795 and $35,580.