UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

FORM 10-Q

 

(Mark One)

(Mark One)
[X]QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
  For the quarterly period endedMarch 31, 20182019
   
  or
   
[  ]TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
  For the transition period from ________________ to ________________

 

Commission File Number: 000-54785

 

INTEGRITY APPLICATIONS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

Delaware 98-0668934

(State or other jurisdiction of

of incorporation or organization)

 

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

19 Ha’Yahalomim Street

P.O. Box 12163

Ashdod, Israel

 L3 7760049
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

 

972 (8) 675-7878
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

972 (8) 675-7878

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

 

N/A
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

N/A

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [  ]

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes [X] No [  ]

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

 Large accelerated filer [  ]Accelerated filer [  ]
 Non-accelerated filer [  ] (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)Smaller reporting company [X]
 Emerging growth company [  ] 

 

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. [  ]

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes [  ] No [X]

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each classTrading Symbol(s)Name of each exchange on which registered
None.

As of May 15, 2018, 7,584,4922019, 146,922,381 shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.001 per share, were outstanding.

 

 

   

 

INTEGRITY APPLICATIONS, INC.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

 Page
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION3
Item 1. Financial Statements.3
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets3
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss4
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Deficit5
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows6
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements8
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.16
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.2623
Item 4. Controls and Procedures.2624
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION2725
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds2725
Item 6. Exhibits.2826
SIGNATURES2927
EXHIBIT INDEX

 

2
 

 

INTEGRITY APPLICATIONS, INC.

 

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

 

Item 1. Financial Statements.

 

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

 

 US dollars (except share data) 
 March 31, December 31,  US dollars (except share data) 
 2018  2017  March 31, 2019 December 31, 2018 
 (unaudited)     (unaudited)    
A S S E T S                
Current Assets                
Cash and cash equivalents  314,387   53,782   30,576   97,079 
Accounts receivable, net  147,378   121,782   33,471   22,779 
Inventories  934,239   957,349   157,344   170,999 
Other current assets  87,907   94,137   40,527   23,288 
Total current assets  1,483,911   1,227,050   261,918   314,145 
                
Operating lease right-of-use assets, net  

198,324

   

-

 
        
Property and Equipment, Net  198,839   216,746   147,435   149,779 
                
Long-Term Restricted Cash  39,033   39,562   54,285   52,605 
                
Funds in Respect of Employee Rights Upon Retirement  183,088   185,570   177,140   171,657 
Total assets  1,904,871   1,668,928   839,102   688,186 
LIABILITIES, TEMPORARY EQUITY AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT        
        
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT        
Current Liabilities                
Accounts payable  2,468,230   2,419,988   1,850,716   2,064,259 
Operating lease liabilities, current  120,182   - 
Other current liabilities  1,123,436   1,265,954   1,125,153   1,157,350 
Total current liabilities  3,591,666   3,685,942   3,096,051   3,221,609 
                
Long-Term Liabilities                
Long-Term Loans from Stockholders  179,423   182,767   174,117   168,221 
Operating lease liabilities, non-current  78,142   - 
Liability for Employee Rights Upon Retirement  183,088   185,570   177,140   171,657 
Warrants with down-round protection  815,899   768,249 
Total long-term liabilities  1,178,410   1,136,586   429,399   339,878 
                
Total liabilities  4,770,076   4,822,528   3,525,450   

3,561,487

 
Temporary Equity        
Convertible Preferred Stock of $ 0.001 par value (“Preferred Stock”):        
10,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock authorized as of March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017        
376 shares of Series A Preferred Stock issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017  221,152   221,152 
15,031 shares of Series B Preferred Stock issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017  6,715,844   6,715,844 
12,004 shares of Series C Preferred Stock issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017        
  6,484,337   6,484,337         
Total temporary equity  13,421,333   13,421,333 
Stockholders’ Deficit                
Common Stock of $ 0.001 par value (“Common Stock”):                
40,000,000 shares authorized as of March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017; 7,469,604 and 6,821,792 shares issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively  7,532   6,824 
200,000,000 and 40,000,000 shares authorized as of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018; 146,440,814 and 141,634,700 shares issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively  146,447   

141,638

 
Additional paid in capital  33,312,949   30,676,180   85,244,557   84,007,612 
Accumulated other comprehensive income  117,979   110,675   131,084   164,232 
Accumulated deficit  (49,724,998)  (47,368,612)  (88,208,436)  (87,186,783)
        
Total stockholders’ deficit  (16,286,538)  (16,574,933)  (2,686,348)  (2,873,301)
Total liabilities, temporary equity and stockholders’ deficit  1,904,871   1,668,928 
Total liabilities and stockholders’ deficit  839,102   688,186 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

3
 

INTEGRITY APPLICATIONS, INC.

 

INTEGRITY APPLICATIONS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

 

 US dollars (except share data)  US dollars (except share data) 
 Three-month period ended March 31,  Three-month period ended March 31, 
 2018  2017  2019 2018 
 (unaudited)  (unaudited) 
Revenues  28,209   96,237   25,562   28,209 
                
Research and development expenses  592,697   581,539   425,117   592,697 
Selling and marketing expenses  308,637   236,939   125,343   308,637 
General and administrative expenses  1,036,684   1,877,359   500,155   1,036,684 
        
Total operating expenses  1,938,018   2,695,837   1,050,615   1,938,018 
        
Operating loss  1,909,809   2,599,600   1,025,053   1,909,809 
        
Financing income, net  62,015   69,275   3,400   62,015 
Loss for the period  1,847,794   2,530,325   1,021,653   1,847,794 
Other comprehensive income:                
Foreign currency translation income  7,304   32,739 
Foreign currency translation loss (income)  33,148   (7,304)
                
Comprehensive loss for the period  1,840,490   2,497,586   1,054,801   1,840,490 
                
Loss per share (Basic and Diluted)  0.34   0.48   0.01   0.34 
Common shares used in computing loss per share (Basic and Diluted)  7,021,533   6,029,342 
        
Weighted average number of Common shares used in computing loss per share (Basic and Diluted)  143,615,503   7,021,533 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

4

INTEGRITY APPLICATIONS, INC.

 

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT

 

  US dollars (except share data) 
  (unaudited) 
  Common Stock  Additional  Accumulated other     Total 
  Number
of shares
  Amount  paid in
capital
  comprehensive income  Accumulated deficit  Stockholders’
deficit
 
Balance as of January 1, 2018  6,821,792   6,824   30,676,180   110,675   (47,368,612)  (16,574,933)
Loss for the period of three months                  (1,847,794)  (1,847,794)
Other comprehensive income  -   -   -   7,304   -   7,304 
Amounts allocated to Series D-1, D-2 and Series D-3 Warrants, net  -   -   716,093   -   -   716,093 
Stock dividend on Series C Preferred Stock  91,283   91   223,642   -   (223,733)  - 
Stock dividend on Series B Preferred Stock  114,304   114   280,045   -   (280,159)  - 
Cash dividend on Series A Preferred Stock  -   -   -   -   (4,700)  (4,700)
Amounts allocated to issuance of Common Stock from Series D offering  435,556   436   855,574   -   -   856,010 
Stock-based compensation  6,669   67   561,415   -   -   561,482 
Balance as of March 31, 2018  7,469,604   7,532   33,312,949   117,979   (49,724,998)  (16,286,538)

  US dollars (except share data) 
  (unaudited) 
  Common Stock  Additional  Accumulated other     Total 
  Number
of shares
  Amount  paid in capital  comprehensive income  Accumulated deficit  Stockholders’ deficit 
Balance as of January 1, 2018  6,821,792   6,824   30,676,180   110,675   (47,368,612)  (16,574,933)
Loss for the period of three months                  (1,847,794)  (1,847,794)
Other comprehensive loss  -   -   -   7,304   -   7,304 
Amounts allocated to Series D-1, D-2 and Series D-3 Warrants, net  -   -   716,093   -   -   716,093 
Stock dividend on Series C Preferred Stock  91,283   91   223,642   -   (223,733)  - 
Stock dividend on Series B Preferred Stock  114,304   114   280,045   -   (280,159)  - 
Cash dividend on Series A Preferred Stock  -   -   -   -   (4,700)  (4,700)
Amounts allocated to issuance of Common Stock from Series D offering  435,556   436   855,574   -   -   856,010 
Stock-based compensation  6,669   67   561,415   -   -   561,482 
Balance as of March 31, 2018  7,469,604   7,532   33,312,949   117,979   (49,724,998)  (16,286,538)

  US dollars (except share data) 
  (unaudited) 
  Common Stock  Additional   Accumulated other     Total 
  Number
of shares
  Amount  paid in
capital
  comprehensive loss  Accumulated deficit  Stockholders’
deficit
 
Balance as of January 1, 2019  141,634,700   141,638   84,007,612   164,232   (87,186,783)  (2,873,301)
Loss for the period of three months                  (1,021,653)  (1,021,653)
Other comprehensive (loss)  -   -   -   (33,148)  -   (33,148)
Amounts allocated to Series D-1, D-2 and Series D-3 Warrants, net  -   -   5,628   -   -   5,628 
Amounts allocated to issuance of Common Stock from Series D offering  3,499,693   3,500   700,737   -   -   704,237 
Issuance of shares as settlement of financial liabilities  1,190,141    1,190   305,866   -    -    307,056 
Warrants issued as consideration for placement services  -        46,246   -    -    46,246 
Stock-based compensation  116,280   119   178,468   -   -   178,587 
Balance as of March 31, 2019  146,440,814   146,447   85,244,557   131,084   (88,208,436)  (2,686,348)

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

5

INTEGRITY APPLICATIONS, INC.

 

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

 

 US dollars  US dollars 
 Three-month period ended March 31,  Three-month period ended March 31, 
 2018  2017  2019 2018 
 (unaudited)  (unaudited) 
Cash flows from operating activities:                
Loss for the period  (1,847,794)  (2,530,325)  (1,021,653)  (1,847,794)
Adjustments to reconcile loss for the period to net cash used in operating activities:                
Depreciation  16,138   16,380   13,518   16,138 
Stock-based compensation  561,482   374,180   178,587   561,482 
Change in the fair value of Warrants with down-round protection  (77,947)  (84,099)  -   (77,947)
Linkage difference on principal of loans from stockholders  (911)  (1,367)  523   (911)
Changes in assets and liabilities:          -     
(Increase) decrease in accounts receivable  (27,585)  2,255 
(Increase) in accounts receivable  (9,981)  (27,585)
Decrease in inventory  10,442   78,416   19,149   10,442 
Decrease in other current assets  5,128   190,590 
(Increase) decrease in other current assets  (16,600)  5,128 
Operating lease right-of-use assets  26,412   - 
(Decrease) increase in accounts payable  66,355   (129,419)  (244,646)  66,355 
Increase in other current liabilities  (132,176)  937,276 
(Decrease) increase in other current liabilities  260,080   (132,176)
Operating lease liabilities  (26,412)  - 
Net cash used in operating activities  (1,426,868)  (1,146,113)  (821,023)  (1,426,868)
  -   -         
Cash flows from investing activities:                
Purchase of property and equipment  (931)  (1,477)  (6,378)  (931)
Net cash used in investing activities  (931)  (1,477)  (6,378)  (931)
                
Cash flows from financing activities                
Cash dividend on Series A Preferred Stock  -   - 
Proceeds allocated to Series C Preferred Stock, net of cash issuance expenses  -   1,738,259 
Proceeds allocated to Series C Warrants, net of cash issuance expenses  -   860,812 
Proceeds allocated to Common Stock from Series D offering, net of cash issuance expenses  924,398   -   750,116   924,398 
Proceeds allocated to Series D Warrants, net of cash issuance expenses  773,302   -   5,995   773,302 
Net cash provided by financing activities  1,697,700   2,599,071   756,111   1,697,700 
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents  (9,296)  38,686 
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents  260,605   1,490,167 
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the period  53,782   148,836 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of the period  314,387   1,639,003 
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash  6,467   (9,296)
Increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash  (64,823)  260,605 
Cash, Cash equivalents, and restricted cash at beginning of theperiod  149,684   53,782 
cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash at end of theperiod  84,861   314,387 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial

6

INTEGRITY APPLICATIONS, INC.

 

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (cont.)

 

Supplementary information on financing activities not involving cash flows:

 

During the three months ended March 31, 2018, $280,159 and $223,733, representing the fair value of the shares of Common Stock issued to owners of Series B Preferred Stock and owners of Series C Preferred Stock, respectively, were accounted for as stock dividends in the statement of changes in stockholders’ deficit and was charged to accumulated deficit against additional paid in capital and Common Stock therein.

During the three months endedending March 31, 2018,2019, the Company accruedcompany settled a cash dividendportion of the outstanding board fees and management payroll obligations in the amount of $4,700,$307,056 through the issuance of 1,190,141 shares of common stock in the aggregate,total to be paid to holders of its Series A Preferred Stockfive board members and a stock dividend in the amount of $503,892, in the aggregate, representing the fair valuethree members of the shares of Common Stock to be issued to owners of Series B Preferred Stock and of Series C Preferred Stock, in lieu of cash dividends. The Company has not paid such dividends, plus interest at a rate of 9% per annum, as of the date of this filing.senior management team

 

During the three months endedending March 31, 2018, $125,5972019, $46,246 representing the fair value of warrants issued as consideration for placement agent services, thisservices. This amount was accounted for as Warrants with down-round protection within long-term liabilities. Of these directprotection. Upon issuance, expenses, $57,209the fair value was allocated to the Series D-1, D-2 and Series D-3 Warrants and was recordedrecognized as a reduction ofan increase in additional paid in capital, and $68,388 was allocated to the shares of common stock  issued in the Series D offering and was recorded as a reduction of additional paid in capital.

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

7
 

INTEGRITY APPLICATIONS, INC.

 

INTEGRITY APPLICATIONS, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

NOTE 1 – GENERAL

 

 A.Integrity Applications, Inc. (the “Company”) was incorporated on May 18, 2010 under the laws of the State of Delaware. On July 15, 2010, Integrity Acquisition Corp. Ltd. (hereinafter: “Integrity Acquisition”), a wholly owned Israeli subsidiary of the Company, which was established on May 23, 2010, completed a merger with A.D. Integrity Applications Ltd. (hereinafter: “Integrity Israel”), an Israeli corporation that was previously held by the stockholders of the Company. Pursuant to the merger, all equity holders of Integrity Israel received the same proportional ownership in the Company as they had in Integrity Israel prior to the merger. Following the merger, Integrity Israel became a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. As the merger transaction constituted a structural reorganization, the merger has been accounted for at historical cost in a manner similar to a pooling of interests. Integrity Israel was incorporated in 2001 and commenced its operations in 2002. Integrity Israel, a medical device company, focuses on the design, development and commercialization of non-invasive glucose monitoring devices for use by people with diabetes.
   
 B.Going concern uncertainty
   
  Since its incorporation, the Company didhas not conductconducted any material operations other than those carried out by Integrity Israel. The development and commercialization of Integrity Israel’s product is expected to require substantial expenditures. Integrity Israel and the Company (collectively, the “Group”) have not yet generated significant revenues from operations, and therefore they are dependent upon external sources for financing their operations. As of March 31, 2018,2019, the Group has incurred accumulated deficit of $49,724,998,$88,208,436, stockholder’s deficit of $16,286,538$2,686,348 negative operating cash flows and negative working capital. Management considered the significance of such conditions in relation to the Group’s ability to meet its current and future obligations and determined that these conditions raise substantial doubt about the Group’s ability to continue as a going concern. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
During the three months ended March 31, 2018,2019, the Company raised funds in an aggregate amount of approximately $1,697,700$756,111 (net of related cash expenses) through the issuance of 435,556200,652 units (the “Series D Units”) each consisting of a) one(a) 3,499,693 shares (collectively, the “Shares”) of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.001 per share of Common Stock, Par Value $0.001 b)(the “Common Stock”), (b) a five year warrant to purchase up to 200,652 shares of Common Stock, at an exercise price of $4.50$1.80 per share, one share of Common Stock; c)Stock (c) a five year warrant to purchase up to 200,652 shares of Common Stock, at an exercise price of $5.75$3.60 per share, one share of Common Stock;Stock, and d)(d) a five year warrant to purchase up to 200,652 shares of Common Stock, at an exercise price of $7.75$5.40 per share, one share of Common Stock.
   
  Until such time as the Group generates sufficient revenue to fund its operations (if ever), the Group plans to finance its operations through the sale of equity or equity-linked securities and/or debt securities and, to the extent available, short term and long-term loans. There can be no assurance that the Group will succeed in obtaining the necessary financing to continue its operations as a going concern.
C.Risk factors
As described in Note 1A and Note 1B above, the Group has a limited operating history and faces a number of risks and uncertainties, including risks and uncertainties regarding continuation of the development process, demand and market acceptance of the Group’s products, the effects of technological changes, competition and the development of products by competitors. Additionally, other risk factors also exist, such as the ability to manage growth and the effect of planned expansion of operations on the Group’s future results and the availability of necessary financing. In addition, the Group expects to continue incurring significant operating costs and losses in connection with the development of its products and marketing efforts. The Group has not yet generated material revenues from its operations to fund its activities and therefore is dependent on the receipt of additional funding from its stockholders and/ or new investors in order to continue its operations.

 

8
 

 

INTEGRITY APPLICATIONS, INC.

 

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (cont.)

 

NOTE 1 – GENERAL (cont.)

 

 D.C.Use of estimates in the preparation of financial statements
   
  

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the consolidated financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates. As applicable to these consolidated financial statements, the most significant estimates and assumptions relate to (i) the fair value estimate of the Warrants with down-round protection, (ii) the allocation of the proceeds and the related issuance costs of the Series D Units, (iii) the going concern assumptions (iv),(ii) measurement of stock based compensation, and (v)(iii) determination of net realizable value of inventory.

 

NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

 

 A.Basis of presentation
   
  Accounting Principles
   
  

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related notes contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017,2018, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on March 30, 2018.April 15, 2019. The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the rules and regulations of the SEC related to interim financial statements. As permitted under those rules, certain information and footnote disclosures normally required or included in financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP have been condensed or omitted. The financial information contained herein is unaudited; however, management believes all adjustments have been made that are considered necessary to present fairly the results of the Company’s financial position and operating results for the interim periods. All such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature.

   
  The results for the three months ended March 31, 20182019 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the year ending December 31, 20182019 or for any other interim period or for any future period.
   
  Principles of Consolidation
   
  The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiary. Significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

 

9
 

 

INTEGRITY APPLICATIONS, INC.

 

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (cont.)

 

NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (cont.)

 

 B.Warrants with down-round protectionRecently issued accounting pronouncements

 1.Accounting Standard Update 2018-07, Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Nonemployee Share-Based Payment Accounting

In June 2018, the FASB issued Accounting Standard Update 2018-07, Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Nonemployee Share-Based Payment Accounting (ASU 2018-07). ASU 2018-07 aligns the measurement and classification guidance for share-based payments to nonemployees with the guidance for share-based payments to employees, with certain exceptions.
  
 

The Company has determined its derivative warrant liabilityConsistent with respect to the remaining  Series A Warrants and warrants issued to its placement agent as partaccounting requirement for employee share-based payment awards, awards within the scope of Topic 718 will be measured at grant-date fair value of the series A Unit offering,equity instruments that an entity is obligated to issue when the series B Unit offering,good has been delivered or the series C Unit offeringservice has been rendered and any other conditions necessary to earn the series D Unit offeringright to benefit from the instruments have been satisfied. Equity-classified nonemployee share-based payment awards will be a Level 3 fair value measurement and has usedmeasured at the Binomial pricing model to calculate its fair value. Because the warrants contain a down round protection feature, the probability that the exercise price of the warrants would decrease as the stock price decreased was incorporated into the valuation calculations.

grant date.
  
 The changes inWith respect to awards with performance conditions ASU 2018-07 concludes that, consistent with the fair valueaccounting for employee share-based payment awards, an entity will consider the probability of the Level 3 liability are as follows (in US dollars):satisfying performance conditions when nonemployee share-based payment awards contain such conditions.

  Warrants with down-round Protection 
  March 31, 
  2018  2017 
  (unaudited) 
       
Balance, Beginning of the period  768,249   681,970 
Warrants issued as consideration for placement services  125,597   156,732 
Change in fair value Warrants with Down-Round Protection  (77,947)  (84,099)
         
Balance, End of period  815,899   754,603 

The key inputs used in the fair value calculations were as follows:

  March 31, 
  2018  2017 
Dividend yield (%)  -   - 
Expected volatility (%) (*)  56.59   56.59 
Risk free interest rate (%)  1.31   0.92 
Expected term of options (years)  1.75-4.92   0.95-4.94 
Exercise price (US dollars)  4.50-7.75   4.50, 7.75 
Share price (US dollars) (**)  2.45   2.38 
Fair value (US dollars) (***)  0.09-0.81   0.11-0.74 

 

 (*)DueASU 2018-07 also requires that the classification of equity classified nonemployee share-based payment awards will continue to be subject to the low trading volumerequirements of Topic 718 unless the Company’s Common Stock,award was modified after the expected volatility was based on a samplegood has been delivered, the service has been rendered, any other conditions necessary to earn the right to benefit from the instruments have been satisfied, and the nonemployee is no longer providing goods or services. This eliminates the requirement to reassess classification of 254 companies operating in the Healthcare Products industry.such awards upon vesting.

In addition, ASU 2018-07 includes certain Non-public Entity-Specific Amendments
 (**)
The Common Stock price, per share reflects the Company’s management’s estimation of the fair value per share of Common Stock as of March 31,ASU 2018-07 is effective for Public entities in annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, and 2017. In reachinginterim periods within those years (first quarter of 2019 for the company). Early adoption is permitted, including in an interim period, but not before an entity adopts the new revenue guidance (which was adopted by the Company in its estimationinterim financial statements for such periods, management considered, among other things, a valuation prepared by a third-party valuation firm following the issuance of the Series C Units and the Series D Units, as applicable to each reporting period (See Note 3)2018).
 (***)
An entity should only remeasure liability-classified awards that have not been settled by the date of adoption and equity-classified awards for which a measurement date has not been established through a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. Upon transition, the entity is required to measure these nonemployee awards at fair value as of the adoption date.
The below chart reflects the Fair Value for eachadoption of the Warrants with down-round Protection that were outstanding as of March 31, 2018 in US dollars.ASU 2018-07 did not have a significant impact on its consolidated financial statements.

 

10

INTEGRITY APPLICATIONS, INC.

 

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (cont.)

 

NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (cont.)

 

Recently issued accounting pronouncements

  Andrew Garrett, Inc., (“AGI”) - Series A  AGI - Series B  AGI - Series C  Placement Agent -
Series D
 
Total quantity  364,071   566,897   844,605   212,000 
Exercise price  4.5   4.5, 7.75   4.5, 7.75   4.5, 5.75, 7.75 
Fair value  0.27   0.09 – 0.29   0.25 – 0.73   0.47– 0.81 

 

 C.2.Revenue recognition

The company recognize revenues from sales of the GlucoTrack® model DF-F and personal ear-clips (“PECs”) when control is transferred to the customer and collectability is probable.

D.Recently issued accounting pronouncementsAccounting Standards Update 2016-02, “Leases”

 

 1.In February 2016, the FASB issued its new lease accounting guidance in Accounting StandardStandards Update 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers”(ASU) No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842).
  
 Commencing January 1, 2018

Under the Company adopted Accounting Standard Update 2014-09, Revenuenew guidance, lessees will be required to recognize the following for all leases (with the exception of short-term leases) at the commencement date: 1. A lease liability, which is a lessee’s obligation to make lease payments arising from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) (“ASU 2014-09”).a lease, measured on a discounted basis; and, 2. A right-of-use asset, which is an asset that represents the lessee’s right to use, or control the use of, a specified asset for the lease term.

  
 ASU 2014-09 outlines a single comprehensive

Under the new guidance, lessor accounting is largely unchanged. Certain targeted improvements were made to align, where necessary, lessor accounting with the lessee accounting model to use inand Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. The new lease guidance simplified the accounting for revenue arising from contractssale and leaseback transactions primarily because lessees must recognize lease assets and lease liabilities. Lessees will no longer be provided with customers and supersedes most current revenue recognition guidance, including industry-specific guidance. ASU 2014-09 also requires entities to disclose sufficient information, both quantitative and qualitative, to enable usersa source of financial statements to understand the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers.off-balance sheet financing.

  
 An entity

Public business entities should apply the amendments in ASU 2014-09 using one of the following two methods: 1. Retrospectively to each prior reporting period presented with a possibility to elect certain practical expedients, or, 2. Retrospectively with the cumulative effect of initially applying ASU 2014-09 recognized at the date of initial application. If an entity elects the latter transition method, it also should provide certain additional disclosures.

During 2016, the FASB issued several Accounting Standard Updates (“ASUs”) that focus on certain implementation issues of the new revenue recognition guidance including Narrow-Scope Improvements, Practical Expedients and technical corrections.
In accordance with an amendment to ASU 2014-09, introduced by Accounting Standard 2015-14, “Revenue from contracts with Customers – Deferral of the Effective Date”,2016-02 for a public entity, the amendments in ASU 2014-09 are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within that reporting period (the first quarter of fiscal year 2018 for the Company). Earlier application is permitted only as of annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period.

Since the company did not report significant revenues, the adoption of ASU 2014-09 did not have a significant impact on its consolidated financial statements.

11

INTEGRITY APPLICATIONS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (cont.)

NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (cont.)

2.Accounting Standard Update (ASU) No. 2017-11, “Earnings Per Share”
In July 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-11, Earnings Per Share (Topic 260); Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity (Topic 480); Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): (Part I) Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Down Round Features, (Part II) Replacement of the Indefinite Deferral for Mandatorily Redeemable Financial Instruments of Certain Nonpublic Entities and Certain Mandatorily Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests with a Scope Exception (“ASU 2017-11”).
Among others, Part I of ASU 2017-11 simplifies the accounting for certain financial instruments with down round features, which is a provision in an equity-linked financial instrument (or embedded feature) that provides a downward adjustment of the current exercise price based on the price of future equity offerings. Current accounting guidance creates cost and complexity for organizations that issue financial instruments with down round features by requiring, on an ongoing basis, fair value measurement of the entire instrument or conversion option.
ASU 2017-11 require companies to disregard the down round feature when assessing whether the instrument is indexed to its own stock, for purposes of determining liability or equity classification. Companies that provide earnings per share (EPS) data will adjust their basic EPS calculation for the effect of the feature when triggered (i.e., when the exercise price of the related equity-linked financial instrument is adjusted downward because of the down round feature) and will also recognize the effect of the trigger within equity.
ASU 2017-11 also addresses navigational concerns within the FASB Accounting Standards Codification related to an indefinite deferral available to private companies.
The provisions of the new ASU related to down rounds are effective for public business entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, (fiscalincluding interim periods within those fiscal years (i.e., January 1, 2019, for thea calendar year Company). Early adoptionapplication is permitted for all entities.public business entities upon issuance.

  
 The company applied the modified retrospective transition approach for leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements. The modified retrospective approach do not require any transition accounting for leases that expired before the earliest comparative period presented. Lessees and lessors may not apply a full retrospective transition approach.
 The Companynew standard also provides practical expedients for an entity’s ongoing accounting. The company elected the short-term lease recognition exemption for all leases with a term shorter than 12 months. This means, for those leases, the company does not recognize ROU assets or lease liabilities, including not recognizing ROU assets or lease liabilities for existing short-term leases of those assets in transition. In addition, the company also elected the transition expedient for short-term leases. Accordingly, the new guidance was not applied for leases that has a term of 12 or fewer months at commencement and does not have a purchase option that the lessee is evaluatingreasonably certain to exercise.

Upon adoption, the company recognized total right of use (“ROU”) assets of $225 thousand, with corresponding liabilities of $225 thousand on the condensed consolidated balance sheets. The adoption did not impact our beginning retained earnings, or our prior year condensed consolidated statements of ASU 2017-11income and statements of cash flows.

Under Topic 842, we determine if an arrangement is a lease at inception. ROU assets and liabilities are recognized at commencement date based on its financial statements. Althoughthe present value of remaining lease payments over the lease term. For this process haspurpose, we consider only payments that are fixed and determinable at the time of commencement. As our leases do not been completed, managements believesprovide an implicit rate, we use our incremental borrowing rate based on the information available at commencement date in determining the present value of lease payments.The incremented borrowing rate is the expected interest rate that its provisions might impact the accountingcompany would have to pay to borrow on a collateralized basis on similar terms and amounts equal to the lease payment and under similar economic environment. The ROU asset also includes any lease payments made prior to commencement and is recorded net of any lease incentives received. Our lease terms may include options to extend or terminate the financial instruments issued by the Companylease when it is reasonably certain that include down-round protection.we will exercise such options.
Operating leases are included in operating lease right-of-use assets, operating lease liabilities, current and operating lease liabilities, non-current on our condensed consolidated balance sheets.
See also Note 5.

 

1112
 

 

INTEGRITY APPLICATIONS, INC.

 

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (cont.)

 

NOTE 3 – RECENT EVENTS

 

During the first quarter of 2018,2019, we received aggregate net proceeds of approximately $1.7 million$756 thousand (net of related cash expenses), from the issuance and sale in a private placement transaction of 435,556200,652 Series D Units. As of March 31, 2018,2019, the Series D Warrants (issued on December 1, 2017, during 2018 and on the first quarter of 2018)2019) are exercisable for an aggregate of 1,590,0004,704,623 shares of Common Stock, in each case subject to adjustment in certain circumstances.

 

Pursuant to a placement agent agreement (the “Placement Agent Agreement”) with the placement agent, the Company paid the placement agent, as a commission, an amount equal to 10% of the aggregate sales price of the Series D Units sold in each closing, plus a non-accountable expense allowance equal to 3% of the aggregate sales price of the Series D Units sold in such closing. In addition, pursuant to the Placement Agent Agreement, in connection with the closings in the first quarter of 2018,2019, the Company is required to issue to the placement agent: (a) 5-year warrants to purchase up to 106,000349,972 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $4.50$0.258 per share, (b) 5-year warrants to purchase up to 53,00020,068 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $5.75$1.80 per share, and share.(c) 5-year warrants to purchase up to 53,00020,068 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $7.75$3.60 per share.share, and d) 5-year warrants to purchase up to 20,068 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $5.40 per share The terms of such warrants are substantially similar to the Series D Warrants except that the warrants issued to the placement agent are exercisable on a cashless basis and include full ratchet anti-dilution protection.

 

On February 15, 2018,January 1, 2019, we issued a ten-year non-qualified stock option to various employees,our President, for the purchase of 767,50075,000 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $4.50 per share, with three-year quarterly vesting commencing on the first quarter after the effective date.

 

NOTE 4 – INVENTORIES

 

  US dollars 
  March 31,  December 31, 
  2019  2018 
  (unaudited)    
Raw materials  13,364   13,522 
Work in process  1,533,267   1,546,764 
Finished products  67,310   67,310 
   1,613,941   1,627,596 
Less – provision for slow moving inventory (*)  (1,456,597)  (1,456,597)
   157,344   170,999 

  US dollars 
  March 31, 2018  December 31, 2017 
  (unaudited)    
       
Raw materials  14,504   12,734 
Work in process  1,590,283   1,556,256 
Finished products  85,586   144,493 
         
   1,690,373   1,713,483 
Less – provision for slow moving inventory  (756,134)  (756,134)
         
   934,239   957,349 

(*)Management evaluates whether inventory reserve for slow-moving or obsolete items is required. To date, as a result of low volume of revenues generated from the sales of the GlucoTrack® model DF-F glucose monitoring device the Group has recorded reserves with respect to its inventory in the amount of approximately US$ 1,457 thousand during 2017 and 2018.

 

1213
 

 

INTEGRITY APPLICATIONS, INC.

 

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (cont.)

NOTE 5 – LEASES

We have entered into several non-cancelable operating lease agreements for our offices and one vehicle. Our leases have original lease periods expiring between 2019 and 2021. Payments due under such lease contracts include primarily fix payments. We do not assume renewals in our determination of the lease term unless the renewals are deemed to be reasonably assured at lease commencement. Our lease agreements do not contain any material residual value guarantees or material restrictive covenants.

The components of lease costs, lease term and discount rate are as follows:

US dollars
Three Months Ended
March 31, 2019
(unaudited)
Operating lease cost:
Office space30,000

vehicle

1,907

31,907
Remaining Lease Term
Office space1.67 years

vehicle

2.17 years
Weighted Average Discount Rate
Office space10%
vehicle10%

The following is a schedule, by years, of maturities of operating lease liabilities as of March 31, 2019:

  US dollars 
  March 31, 2019 
  (unaudited) 

Period:

   
The remainder of 2019  95,721 
2020  117,628 
2021  3,178 
Total operating lease payments  216,527 
Less: imputed interest  18,203 
Present value of lease liabilities  198,324 

13

INTEGRITY APPLICATIONS, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (cont.)

 

NOTE 56 – OTHER CURRENT LIABILITIES

 

 US dollars  US dollars 
 March 31, 2018  December 31, 2017  March 31, December 31, 
 (unaudited)     2019 2018 
      (unaudited)    
Employees and related institutions  245,003   336,783   242,061   239,964 
Accrued expenses and other  878,433   929,171   883,092   917,386 
          1,125,153   1,157,350 
  1,123,436   1,265,954 

 

NOTE 67 – FINANCING INCOME, NET

 

 US dollars  US dollars 
 Three-month period
ended March 31,
  Three-month period
ended March 31,
 
 2018  2017  2019 2018 
 (unaudited)  (unaudited) 
Israeli CPI linkage difference on principal of loans from stockholders  911   1,367   (523)  911 
Exchange rate differences  (13,627)  (10,474)  8,063   (13,627)
Interest expenses on credit from banks and other  (4,140)  (3,216)
Change in fair value of Warrants with down round protection  77,947   84,099   -   77,947 
Other  (3,216)  (5,717)
  62,015   69,275         
  3,400   62,015 

 

NOTE 7 –8– LOSS PER SHARE

 

In periods of net loss, basic loss per share is computed by dividing net loss for the period after consideration of the effect of dividends on preferred stock by the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period.

 

The loss and the weighted average number of shares used in computing basic and diluted loss per share for the three-month periods ended March 31, 20182019 and 20172018 are as follows:

  US dollars 
  Three-month period
ended March 31,
 
  2018  2017 
  (unaudited) 
Loss for the period  1,847,794   2,530,325 
Cash dividend on Series A Preferred Stock  4,700   4,700 
Stock dividend on Series B Preferred Stock  280,159   246,031 
Stock dividend on Series C Preferred Stock  223,733   115,986 
Loss for the period attributable to common stockholders  2,356,386   2,897,042 

  US dollars 
  Three-month period
ended March 31,
 
  2019  2018 
  (unaudited) 
Loss for the period  1,021,653   1,847,794 
Cash dividend on Series A Preferred Stock  -   4,700 
Stock dividend on Series B Preferred Stock  -   280,159 
Stock dividend on Series C Preferred Stock  -   223,733 
Loss for the period attributable to common stockholders  1,021,653   2,356,386 

 

 14 

 

INTEGRITY APPLICATIONS, INC.

 

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (cont.)

 

NOTE 78 – LOSS PER SHARE (cont.)

 Number of shares  Number of shares 
 Three-month period ended March 31,  Three-month period
ended March 31,
 
 2018 2017  2019 2018 
 (unaudited)  (unaudited) 
Number of shares:             
Weighted average number of shares used in the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share  7,021,533   6,029,342   143,615,503   7,021,533 
                
Total weighted average number of common shares related to outstanding convertible preferred stock, options and warrants excluded from the calculations of diluted loss per share (*)  25,524,332   16,056,013 
Total weighted average number of common shares related to outstanding options and warrants excluded from the calculations of diluted loss per share (*)  76,597,357   25,524,332 

 

(*)All outstanding convertible Preferred Stock, stock options and warrants have been excluded from the calculation of the diluted net loss per share for all the reported periods, because the effect of the common shares issuable as a result of the exercise or conversion of these instruments was determined to be anti-dilutive.

 

NOTE 89 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

 

On May 10, 2018,Subsequent to March 31, 2019 the Company,received aggregate gross proceeds of $517,000 in entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with certain accredited investors (the “Purchasers”) pursuant to which, the fifth closing of the private placement of its securities from seven accredited investors. The Company issued to the investorsPurchasers an aggregate of 114,88828,890 units of the Company (each a “Series DUnit“Unit” and, collectively, the “Units”), each consisting of (a) one share503,877 shares (collectively, the “Shares”) of the Company’s Common Stock,common stock, par value $0.001 per share (the “Common Stock”), (b) a five year warrant to purchase up to 28,890 shares of Common Stock, at an exercise price of $4.50$1.80 per share, one share of Common Stock (c) a five year warrant to purchase up to 28,890 shares of Common Stock, at an exercise price of $5.75$3.60 per share, one share of Common Stock, and (d) a five year warrant to purchase up to 28,890 shares of Common Stock, at an exercise price of $7.75$5.40 per share, one share of Common Stock.

The Company received aggregate gross proceeds of $130,000 from the sale of the Units pursuant to the Purchase Agreement.

 

15

Pursuant to a placement agent agreement (the “Placement Agent Agreement”) with the placement agent for the offering of the Units (the “Placement Agent”), at the closing of the sale of the Units the Company paid the Placement Agent, as a commission, an amount equal to 10% of the aggregate sales price of the Units, plus a non-accountable expense allowance equal to 3% of the aggregate sales price of the Units. In addition, pursuant to the Placement Agent Agreement, the Company is required to issue to the Placement Agent: (a) 5 year warrants to purchase up to 50,388 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $0.258 per share (b) 5 year warrants to purchase up to 2,890 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $1.80 per share (c) 5 year warrants to purchase up to 2,890 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $3.60 per share and (d) 5 year warrants to purchase up to 2,890 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $5.40 per share. The terms of the Placement Agent warrants will be substantially similar to the investors Warrants except that the Placement Agent warrants will also be exercisable on a cashless basis and will include full ratchet anti-dilution protection.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

 

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

 

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements include statements about our expectations, beliefs or intentions regarding our product development efforts, business, financial condition, results of operations, strategies and prospects. All statements other than statements of historical fact included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, including statements regarding our future activities, events or developments, including such things as future revenues, capital raising and financing, product development, clinical trials, regulatory approval, market acceptance, responses from competitors, capital expenditures (including the amount and nature thereof), business strategy and measures to implement strategy, competitive strengths, goals, expansion and growth of our business and operations, plans, references to future success, projected performance and trends, and other such matters, are forward-looking statements. The words “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “estimate,” “plan,” “may,” “will,” “could,” “would,” “should” and other similar words and phrases, are intended to identify forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements made in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are based on certain historical trends, current conditions and expected future developments as well as other factors we believe are appropriate in the circumstances. These statements relate only to events as of the date on which the statements are made and we undertake no obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law. All of the forward-looking statements made in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are qualified by these cautionary statements and there can be no assurance that the actual results anticipated by us will be realized or, even if substantially realized, that they will have the expected consequences to or effects on us or our business or operations. Whether actual results will conform to our expectations and predictions is subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially. Risks and uncertainties, the occurrence of which could adversely affect our business, include the risks identified under the caption “Risk Factors” included in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017.2018. The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the condensed consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included in Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

16

 

Overview

 

Incorporated in Delaware in May 2010, weWe are a medical device company focused on the design, development and commercialization of non-invasive glucose monitoring devices for use by people with diabetes and pre-diabetics. On July 15, 2010, we completed a reverse triangular merger with Integrity Israel and Integrity Acquisition Corp. Ltd., an Israeli corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of ours, pursuant to which Integrity Acquisition Corp. Ltd. merged withandinto Integrity Israel and all of the stockholders and option holders of Integrity Israel received shares and options in us in exchange for their shares and options in Integrity Israel (the “Reorganization”). Following the Reorganization, the former equity holders of Integrity Israel were entitled to the same proportional ownership in us as they had in Integrity Israel prior to the Reorganization. As a result of the Reorganization, Integrity Israel became a wholly owned subsidiary of ours. We operate primarily through Integrity Israel.

diabetes. Integrity Israel was founded in 2001 with a mission to develop, produce and market non-invasive glucose monitors for home use by diabetics. We have developed a non-invasive blood glucose monitor, the GlucoTrack® model DF-F glucose monitoring device, which is designed to help people with diabetes and pre-diabetics obtain blood glucose level readings without the pain, inconvenience, cost and difficulty of conventional (invasive) spot finger stick devices. The GlucoTrack® model DF-F utilizes a patented combination of ultrasound, electromagnetic and thermal technologies to obtain blood glucose measurements in less than one minute via a small sensor that is clipped onto one’s earlobe and connected to a small, handheld control and display unit, all without drawing blood or interstitial fluid.blood.

 

InOn June 4, 2013, we received the initial Conformité Européene (CE)CE Mark (indicating the conformity of the Company’s product with health, safety, and environmental protection standards for products sold within the European Economic Area) approval for the GlucoTrack® model DF-F non-invasive glucose monitoring device from DEKRA Certification B.V., our European notified body (the “Notified Body”), which is an entity that has been accredited by a member state of the European Union (“EU”) to assess whether a product to be placed on the market meets certain preordained standards.

This original approval required that the device be re-calibrated every 30 days, with each such re- calibration taking between 2.5 and 3 hours to complete.. In March 2014, we received CE Mark approval for six months’ calibration validity of the same device. This approval eliminates the need for monthly re-calibrations and enables the calibration process to be conducted only when the sensor is replaced, once every 6 months. We believe that this is a significant feature of the GlucoTrack® model DF-F. On August 31, 2015, we received a further approval from the Notified Body for improvements to the GlucoTrack® model DF-F to simplify and shorten the initial calibration process for the device (from approximately 2.5 hours to approximately half an hour). All these improvements enhance the competitiveness of the device and its commercial viability. In addition, we received approval from the Notified Body on the updated intended use for the device, which expands the intended user population to include not only Type 2 diabetics, but also people suffering from pre-diabetes conditions, which we believe represents a material expansion of the potential market for the device. In December 2015, we received approval from the Notified Body for further improvements to the GlucoTrack® model DF-F that increase the accuracy and efficacy of the device. As a result of these incremental, but important, enhancements to the performance of the device we believe that the product is ready for commercial launch in specific market segments.

Receipt of the CE Mark allows us to market and sell the GlucoTrack® model DF-F glucose monitoring device in EUEuropean Union (“EU”) member countries that have adopted the European Medical Device Directive (the “MDD”) without being subject to additional national regulations with regard to demonstration of performance and safety. However, although the MDD is applicable throughout the EU, in practice it does not ensure uniform regulation throughout the EU. Accordingly, member countries may apply and enforce the MDD’s terms differently, and certain EU member countries may request or require performance and/or safety data in additionadditional to the MDD’s requirements from time to time, on a case-by-case basis. The CE Mark also permits the sale in countries that have an MDD Mutual Recognition Agreement with the EU. This would

On August 31, 2015, we received approval from the Notified Body for improvements to the GlucoTrack® model DF-F which simplify and shorten (from approximately 2.5 hours to approximately half an hour) the initial calibration process for the device. These improvements are intended to reduce the backlog created as purchasers of the device await calibration. In addition, we received approval from the Notified Body on the updated intended use for the device, which expands the intended user population to include some countries in South East Asianot only Type 2 diabetics, but persons suffering from pre-diabetes conditions as well, as Latin America opening newwhich we believe represents a material expansion of the potential marketsmarket for Integrity on a global basis.

Safety and quality are non-negotiables in the medical devices industry. Regulatory requirements are increasingly stringent throughout every step of a product’s life cycle, including service and delivery. More and more, organizations indevice. In December 2015, we received approval from the industry are expected to demonstrate their quality management processes and ensure best practice in everything they do. ISO 13485, is an internationally agreed standard that sets out the requirementsNotified Body for a quality management system specificfurther improvements to the medical devices industry.GlucoTrack® model DF-F that increase the accuracy and efficacy of the device. On February 19, 2016, we received an extension of our ISO 13485:2003 certificate and Annex II certification from the EU. The ISO 13485:2003 certification signifies that we have met the standards required for company-wide implementation of device quality management system(s). The scope of the certification is design, development, manufacture and service of non-invasive glucose monitoring systems for home use. Annex II also addresses quality control systems. The certification allows us to self-certify certain modifications and changes and simplifies some of the reporting to and review by the relevant Notified Body. This can shorten the CE-mark review process of future GlucoTrack® model DF-F enhancements or revisions, including software updates and other improvements ofrevisions. Without an Annex II certification, each new device enhancement or modified version would be subject to the device that do not affect the intended use and/or safety performance.full EU CE-mark review process. The ISO 13485:2003 and Annex II certifications enable us to potentially reduceimprove the time to market for product sales on new, enhanced or modified GlucoTrack® model DF-F devices.

The GlucoTrack® model DF-F has not yet been approved for commercial sale in the United States. On August 10, 2015, we submitted pre- submission documents

In addition to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (the “FDA”) in connection with our proposed future application for FDA approval of our U.S. clinical trial protocol. The pre-submission documentation was submittedimprovements to the FDA in order to obtain the FDA’s guidance regarding the U.S. regulatory pathway for the GlucoTrack® model DF-F the proper approachdescribed above, we have also continued to refining the trial protocol and preparing the pre-marketing application. On October 19, 2015, we met with the FDA to discuss the pre-submission documents, including the approach to and details of the clinical trial protocol for the GlucoTrack® model DF-F. On May 10, 2016, we submitted a pre-submission supplement (including clinical trial protocol)work on additional improvements to the FDAdevice and the development of new devices and, subject to our raising sufficient funds to do so, intend to continue these efforts in 2019. Specifically, we developed wireless communication module (WLM) with embedded Bluetooth Low-Energy (BLE) and Wi-Fi technologies, which reflects the feedback received from the FDA at our October 2015 meeting. On July 18, 2016, we completed a teleconference with the FDA to further discuss our pre-submission supplement. At the endexpect will enable transmission of this discussion, we received verbal confirmation from the FDA that clinical trials ofmeasurement data captured by the GlucoTrack® model DF-F constitute non-significant risk device studies, which allows the trials to proceed without an Investigational Device Exemption (IDE) application. Such trials are assessed by the FDA and not considered to present a potential for serious risk to the health, safety or the welfare of subjects. We expect that the regulatory pathway would be that of ade novo 510k, requiring a clinical trial design based on feedback from the agency. The initiation of clinical trials in the USA is subject to raising adequate financing to fund the clinical program through completion. If we are unable to raise additional capital of at least $10 million, we do not expect to commence such clinical trials.

Clinical trials conducted recently in Germany by Pfutzner Science & Health Institute, GmbH, headed by Prof. Dr. Andreas Pfutzner, on subjects with Type 2 diabetes and pre-diabetics, as well as at Soroka University Medical Center, Beer-Sheva, Israel, demonstrated favorable results, which were presented on November 10, 2016 by the Company at the 16th annual Diabetes Technology Meeting (DTM), Bethesda, MD in an invited presentation. Most notably, the presentation included data validating that GlucoTrack’s accuracy has increased significantly. Results from the trials show 99.7% of the study data points within the clinically accepted A and B zones of the Consensus Error Grid (which is a new tool for evaluating the accuracy of a blood glucose meter) (Type 2), 99.3% of the study data points were within the clinically accepted A and B zones of the Clarke Error Grid (which is a tool used to quantify the clinical accuracy of blood glucose estimates generated by meters as compared to a reference value), 17.0% Mean Absolute Relative Difference, and 12.9% Median Absolute Relative Difference. In addition,cloud-based server. We also started to design the German trial concluded that the data confirms the performance of the GlucoTrack® among its intended users, including pre-diabetic patients.

In the second half of 2017 we conducted a strategic review of our previous commercial activities. We established a cross-functional task force with the goal of reviewing the current commercial performance in all countries and identifying the critical success factors (CSF’s) necessary for successful commercialization. The CSF’s that were determined to be most important to our future commercial success include: 1) selecting the right distribution partners within countries that have knowledge and experience in diabetes, the appropriate capabilities and proven performance in the sales, marketing, and customer service in support of medical devices, and a commitment to investing the appropriate resources required for a successful launch and building of the business; 2) segmenting and targeting the right customers including key opinion leaders, treating physicians, and diabetes nurses within the healthcare provider communities as well as those patient groups that will benefit most from the use of a non-invasive device; 3) revising the cost structure for GlucoTrack® so that it will be more affordable on a monthly basis for patients; and 4) working with government authorities and health insurance companies to achieve full or partial reimbursement for GlucoTrack® within covered medical plans.

We have started the implementation of this new commercial program by selecting two countries where we will pilot this approach as our proof-of-concept; the Netherlands and Israel. These countries were chosen based on the relatively smaller size of these marketplaces that will allow us to be able to rapidly assess our performance and make adjustments as necessary. On December 22, 2017 we signed an exclusive distribution agreement with a new partner in the Netherlands (MediReva B.V.) and are underway with launch preparations for the second quarter of 2018. We have been working closely with our new distributor and have accomplished: product and disease area training across the organization; segmentation of the local target audiences including key opinion leaders, treating physicians, and diabetes nurses; and discussions with the majority of health insurance companies.

We are also in negotiations with a new partner for Israel with the goal of launching in the third quarter of 2018. As soon as these two pilots demonstrate that our new strategic approach is successful, we plan to rapidly rollout this approach across prioritized European countries in the last quarter of 2018 and throughout 2019.

In the meantime, we have assessed the performance of all of our current distributors in Europe and Asia. A number of these agreements have been terminated given that they did not perform in the past and had minimal or no sales over the course of 2017. We are also initiating discussions with our distributors in the remaining countries to focus on changes needed to address the CSF’s for future success with implementation foreseen in the second half of 2018.

We do not own commercial manufacturing facilities and do not intend to build commercial manufacturing facilities of our own in the foreseeable future. We currently utilize a third-party manufacturer in Israel to manufacture the GlucoTrack® model DF-F. Moreover, in July 2014, we entered into a manufacturing agreement with Wistron Corp. (“Wistron”), a Taiwanese entity and the manufacturing arm of Acer Inc. Pursuant to such agreement, Wistron has agreed to mass produce and service, on a non-exclusive basis, the GlucoTrack® model DF-F and any future products, if any, introduced by us. Pursuant to such agreement, Wistron has also agreed to provide full turn-key manufacturing services for the GlucoTrack® model DF- F, including components procurement, unit assembly, device integration, testing, packaging and delivery to customers (distributors). In November 2015, we sent a delegation to Wistron’s main production facility in Taiwan to, among other things, inspect the readiness of Wistron’s production line for the GlucoTrack® model DF-F. Wistron has produced a small pilot batch and recently produced a second pilot batch of the GlucoTrack® model DF-F device. Following the receipt of an official clearance from the Taiwanese authorities on January 11, 2017 and the successful completion of a GMP (Good Manufacturing Practice) audit by the local regulatory authorities in July 2017, the production line for the GlucoTrack® model DF-F is now operational. We intend to utilize the services of both Wistron and the Israeli third-party manufacturer to produce the GlucoTrack® model DF-F.

In support of the commercialization effort, we intend to conduct further post-market clinical trials, as well as publish scientific and clinical studies, case studies, and white papers. To that end, we have engaged with a leading clinic in Germany, Pfutzner Science & Health Institute, GmbH, headed by Prof. Dr. Andreas Pfutzner, to conduct additional clinical trials on subjects with Type 2 diabetes and pre-diabetics. We anticipate adding additional sites in Europe.

In September 2016, we had a booth at the 52nd annual conference of the European Association for Study of Diabetes (EASD) in Munich.

In December 2016, we had a poster at the 9th Annual World Congress on Prevention of Diabetes and its Complications (WCPD, in Atlanta, GA). This Congress provided the Company with an opportunity to showcase GlucoTrack® model DF-F as a tool to fight diabetes and its complications, as well as using GlucoTrack® model DF-F as a tool to assist pre-diabetics.

In February 2017, the Company presented at the 10th International Conference on Advanced Technologies & Treatments for Diabetes (ATTD 2017) in Paris, France. The Company presented key findings including (1) the latestnext generation GlucoTrack® algorithm, which compensates for the tissue-lagging effect relative to blood glucose changes post-meal intake, significantly improves GlucoTrack® accuracy at different post-prandial (post- meal) states, and equalizes accuracy for pre- and post-meal glucose readings; (2) GlucoTrack® clinical accuracy as measured by Consensus Error Grid (CEG) showed 100% of the pre-prandial readings in the A+B zones, and 98.2% of the post-prandial readings in the A+B zones; (3) GlucoTrack® Model DF-F demonstrates consistent glucose measurement repeatability between different GlucoTrack® devices and on each earlobe of the same subject; (4) the repeatability of different GlucoTrack® devices is similar at all tested glucose ranges and post-prandial time periods; and (5) the GlucoTrack® mean precision absolute relative difference (PARD) of 8.2% is equivalent or better than the independently reported PARD values of commercially available continuous glucose monitoring systems.

On June 12, 2017, we announced new data demonstrating the clinical performance of GlucoTrack®, further supporting its suitability for people with type 2 diabetes across various medication regimes. The data was recently presented at the American Diabetes Association’s (ADA) 77th Scientific Sessions in San Diego, CA.

In September 2017, we presented key findings at the European Association for the Study of Diabetes Congress (EASD) in Lisbon, Portugal. The study evaluated GlucoTrack®’s accuracy in 172 adults with type 2 diabetes who were prescribed one or more medications for major medical conditions associated with diabetes. The experiment stratified participants into five medication groups, focusing on anti-cholesterolemia, anti-hypertension, anti-thrombotic, and anti-diabetic (prolonged duration and short and mixed duration) medications. The study demonstrated that the use of these common concomitant medications in diabetes had no effect on the performance of GlucoTrack®. We also had a display booth at this conference that was well attended by hundreds of treating physicians and diabetes nurses.

We have not yet generated any material revenues from our operations and, as of March 31, 2018, have incurred an accumulated deficit of $49,724,998, stockholders’ deficit of $16,286,538 and negative operating cash flows. We currently have no material sources of recurring revenue and therefore are dependent upon external sources for financing our operations. There can be no assurance that we will succeed in obtaining the necessary financing to continue our operations. As a result, substantial doubt exists regarding our ability to continue as a going concern.

 

Recent Developments

 

During the first quarter of 2018,2019, we received aggregate net proceeds of approximately $1.7 million$756 thousand (net of related cash expenses), from the issuance and sale in a private placement transaction of 435,556200,652 Series D Units. As of March 31, 2018,2019, the Series D Warrants (issued on December 1, 2017, during 2018 and on the first quarter of 2018)2019) are exercisable for an aggregate of 1,590,0004,704,623 shares of Common Stock, in each case subject to adjustment in certain circumstances.

 

Pursuant to a placement agent agreement (the “Placement Agent Agreement”) with the placement agent, the Company paid the placement agent, as a commission, an amount equal to 10% of the aggregate sales price of the Series D Units sold in each closing, plus a non-accountable expense allowance equal to 3% of the aggregate sales price of the Series D Units sold in such closing. In addition, pursuant to the Placement Agent Agreement, in connection with the closings in the first quarter of 2018,2019, the Company is required to issue to the placement agent: (a) 5-year warrants to purchase up to 87,112349,972 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $4.50$0.258 per share, (b) 5-year warrants to purchase up to 43,55620,068 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $5.75$1.80 per share, and share.(c) 5-year warrants to purchase up to 43,55620,068 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $7.75$3.60 per share.share, and d) 5-year warrants to purchase up to 20,068 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $5.40 per share The terms of such warrants are substantially similar to the Series D Warrants except that the warrants issued to the placement agent are exercisable on a cashless basis and include full ratchet anti-dilution protectionprotection.

 

On March 23, 2018,January 1, 2019, we issued a ten-year non-qualified stock option to our President, for the Company held its 2018 Special Meetingpurchase of Stockholders. At the Meeting, the Company’s stockholders voted75,000 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $4.50 per share, with three-year quarterly vesting commencing on the proposal to approve and ratifyfirst quarter after the increase of the total number of shares authorized for issuance under the Company’s Compensation Plan to 7,000,000 shares, including an amendment to the Incentive Plan on April 7, 2017 to increase from 1,000,000 shares to 5,625,000 shares and another amendment on February 15, 2018 to increase from 5,625,000 shares to 7,000,000 shares.effective date.

 

We recently laid out ourOur strategic priorities in termsinclude the research and development of product enhancements that will improve the ease and usability of GlucoTrack for patients with a future generation of products. As a result of the review ofWe are focusing our corporate strategy, we have decided to concentrate our R&Dresearch and development activities around 4 main strategic pillars;pillars:

 

1.Wireless Connectivity

 

We have developed a wireless module (“WLM”GlucoTrack Link”) with embedded Bluetooth Low-Energy (BLE) and Wi-Fi technologies,, which enables the transmission of measurement data captured by the GlucoTrack® model DF-F to a cloud-based server or a smart device. We expect thisThis module and the related applications to facilitate the viewing of glucose related data and correlate it closely with lifestyle choices made by the users, be that dietary choices or activity-based choices, among other things. The wireless module will also facilitate sharing, viewing and analysis of GlucoTrack® measurements and profileglucose profiles by clinicians and othersother caregivers.

 

2.Digital Health Applications

 

We intend to develop smart device applications (“Apps”) to facilitate the interaction of users with GlucotrackGlucotrack® DF-F and the glucose data collected. The Apps will be compatible with both IOS and Android operating systems. We intend to develop Apps that support the management of Type 2 diabeticsdiabetes and pre-diabetic patients by providedproviding immediate feedback and insights asthat can be derived from glucose measurements. Enhanced capabilities within the Apps may include goal setting, alarms and reminders, and diabetes management tips and tools. It will also be designed to the glucose measurements.provide analyses of trends over multiple time periods. The goal is to provide relevant information to guide patients in their journey to change behaviorbehaviors and improve the management of their condition. The Apps are expected to have a user-directed capability to connect with third party healthcare providers (physicians, dieticians, and nurse practitioners), in order to receive professional guidance based on the accumulated information ultimately leading to improved management of the condition and better disease outcomes.

3.AccuracySelf-Personalization

 

WhileThe current version of Glucotrack® DF-F requires each patient to be calibrated in a face-to-face session with a certified trained calibrator. The calibration requires patients to participate in a one-hour session when first using their new device and again every six months when the accuracy ofpersonal ear clip is replaced. We are developing a self-calibration module for Glucotrack® DF-F which will allow all patients to set up the Glucotrackdevice on their own without the need for a trained calibrator. This enhancement will allow patients to set up Glucotrack® DF-F is sufficient for the management of Type 2 diabeticsthemselves easier and pre-diabetic patients (and approved as such by the EU authorities) we strivefaster without support from a calibrator. For our distributors, this will lower patient initiation and support costs allowing them to further improve the product in future iterationsre-deploy these funds into their marketing and maximize it’s potential by expanding the addressable market, e.g. into Type 1 diabetes. The research projects include further improving the algorithms involved in computing our glucose measurement data, as well as deeper research on the existing sensing technologiessales efforts. It will also provide them with a substantial opportunity to improve sensitivity. The ultimate goal being to eventually commercialize a non-invasive device for all types of diabetics.

open up additional distribution channels including pharmacies, clinics and online.

4.Miniaturization

 

The objective of this project is to reducetransform the existing device tointo a simple, aesthetically designed,easy to use wireless ear-clip which would measure glucose and communicate the results seamlessly to any other platform whether through a wireless connection to the cloud or a Bluetooth connection to a smart device such as a smartphone, tablet or computer. As a result,computer, eliminating the current handheld display would be eliminated completely.display. The result would be a user- friendly,user-friendly, inconspicuous measuring device for the management of diabetes and pre-diabetes. WithWe expect this new device to have much greater patient desire to purchase and user acceptance. We also expect this new device will have a significantly cheaperlower cost to manufacture than our current device.

 

Simultaneously we will be working to further simplify the calibration process eventually enabling self-calibration

After months of protracted negotiations with our China distributor we finally reached an impasse on several critical issues and decided that it would be in the best interests of the Company to terminate the existing agreements with such distributor due to various breaches of the distributor. On May 14, 2018, the Company sent notices to the distributor regarding the Company’s intention to terminate the agreement unless the breaches are cured within 30 days. The distributor plays a critical role in assisting the Company to obtain regulatory approval by the China Food and Drug Administration (“CFDA”) for the GlucoTrack® model DF-F. If the breaches are not cured within the given timeframe and the relationship is terminated, and as previously reported, the registration of GlucoTrack® in China will be delayed significantly while we seek new partnering options with the intent to re-submit the dossier at a later date. If we were unable to partner with another distributor in China on terms mutually agreed upon by us, we would not have the ability to distribute our products in China or obtain regulatory approve from the CFDA.

Significant Accounting Policies

 

Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”). In connection with the preparation of our financial statements, we are required to make assumptions and estimates about future events and apply judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue, expenses and the related disclosures. We base our assumptions, estimates and judgments on historical experience, current trends and other factors that management believes to be relevant at the time our consolidated financial statements are prepared. On a regular basis, management reviews the accounting policies, assumptions, estimates and judgments to ensure that our financial statements are presented fairly and in accordance with U.S. GAAP. However, because future events and their effects cannot be determined with certainty, actual results could differ from our assumptions and estimates, and such differences could be material.

 

Our significant accounting policies are described in Note 2, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements appearing in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017.2018. Our management believes that, as for the financial statements for the periods included in this report, the going concern assessment and assumptions relate to (i) the fair value estimatemeasurement of the Warrants with down-round protection, (ii) the allocation of the proceeds and the related issuance costs of the Series D Units,stock based compensation is a critical accounting policy (iii) measurement of stock based compensation, and, (iv)(ii) determination of net realizable value of inventory. However, due to the early stage of operations of the Company, there are no other accounting policies that are considered to be critical accounting policies by management.

 

21

Going Concern Uncertainty

 

The development and commercialization of our product will require substantial expenditures. We have not yet generated any material revenues and have incurred a substantial accumulated deficit and negative operating cash flows. We currently have no sources of recurring revenue and are therefore dependent upon external sources for financing our operations. There can be no assurance that we will succeed in obtaining the necessary financing to continue our operations.Management’s plans concerning these matters are described in Note 1B to our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017. (See2018. (see also Note 1B to our interim financial statements for the period ended March 31, 2018)2019). As a result, our independent registered public accounting firm has expressed substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern in our Annual Report on Form 10-Kannual report for year ended December 31, 2017.2018. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

 

1.Accounting Standard Update 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers”

commencing January 1, 2018, the company adopted Accounting Standard Update 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) ("ASU 2014-09").

ASU 2014-09 outlines a single comprehensive model to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and supersedes most current revenue recognition guidance, including industry-specific guidance. ASU 2014-09 also requires entities to disclose sufficient information, both quantitative and qualitative, to enable users of financial statements to understand the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers.

An entity should apply the amendments in ASU 2014-09 using one of the following two methods: 1. Retrospectively to each prior reporting period presented with a possibility to elect certain practical expedients, or, 2. Retrospectively with the cumulative effect of initially applying ASU 2014-09 recognized at the date of initial application. If an entity elects the latter transition method, it also should provide certain additional disclosures.

During 2016, the FASB issued several Accounting Standard Updates (“ASUs”) that focus on certain implementation issues of the new revenue recognition guidance including Narrow-Scope Improvements, Practical Expedients and technical corrections.

In accordance with an amendment to ASU 2014-09, introduced by Accounting Standard 2015-14, “Revenue from contracts with Customers – Deferral of the Effective Date”, for a public entity, the amendments in ASU 2014-09 are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within that reporting period (the first quarter of fiscal year 2018 for the Company). Earlier application is permitted only as of annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period.

Since the company did not report significant revenues, the adoption of ASU 2014-09 did not have a significant impact on its consolidated financial statements.

2.Accounting Standard Update (ASU) No. 2017-11, “Earnings Per Share”

In July 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-11, Earnings Per Share (Topic 260); Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity (Topic 480); Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): (Part I) Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Down Round Features, (Part II) Replacement of the Indefinite Deferral for Mandatorily Redeemable Financial Instruments of Certain Nonpublic Entities and Certain Mandatorily Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests with a Scope Exception (“ASU 2017-11”).

Among others, Part I of ASU 2017-11 simplifies the accounting for certain financial instruments with down round features, which is a provision in an equity-linked financial instrument (or embedded feature) that provides a downward adjustment of the current exercise price based on the price of future equity offerings. Current accounting guidance creates cost and complexity for organizations that issue financial instruments with down round features by requiring, on an ongoing basis, fair value measurement of the entire instrument or conversion option.

ASU 2017-11 require companies to disregard the down round feature when assessing whether the instrument is indexed to its own stock, for purposes of determining liability or equity classification. Companies that provide earnings per share (EPS) data will adjust their basic EPS calculation for the effect of the feature when triggered (i.e., when the exercise price of the related equity-linked financial instrument is adjusted downward because of the down round feature) and will also recognize the effect of the trigger within equity.

ASU 2017-11 also addresses navigational concerns within the FASB Accounting Standards Codification related to an indefinite deferral available to private companies.

The provisions of the new ASU related to down rounds are effective for public business entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018 (fiscal 2019 for the Company). Early adoption is permitted for all entities.

The Company is evaluating the impact of ASU 2017-11 on its financial statements. Although this process has not been completed, managements believes that its provisions might impact the accounting of the financial instruments issued by the Company that include down-round protection.

23
 1.Accounting Standard Update 2018-07, Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Nonemployee Share-Based Payment Accounting

In June 2018, the FASB issued Accounting Standard Update 2018-07, Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Nonemployee Share-Based Payment Accounting (ASU 2018-07). ASU 2018-07 aligns the measurement and classification guidance for share-based payments to nonemployees with the guidance for share-based payments to employees, with certain exceptions.
Consistent with the accounting requirement for employee share-based payment awards, awards within the scope of Topic 718 will be measured at grant-date fair value of the equity instruments that an entity is obligated to issue when the good has been delivered or the service has been rendered and any other conditions necessary to earn the right to benefit from the instruments have been satisfied. Equity-classified nonemployee share-based payment awards will be measured at the grant date.
With respect to awards with performance conditions ASU 2018-07 concludes that, consistent with the accounting for employee share-based payment awards, an entity will consider the probability of satisfying performance conditions when nonemployee share-based payment awards contain such conditions.
ASU 2018-07 also requires that the classification of equity classified nonemployee share-based payment awards will continue to be subject to the requirements of Topic 718 unless the award was modified after the good has been delivered, the service has been rendered, any other conditions necessary to earn the right to benefit from the instruments have been satisfied, and the nonemployee is no longer providing goods or services. This eliminates the requirement to reassess classification of such awards upon vesting.
In addition, ASU 2018-07 includes certain Non-public Entity-Specific Amendments
ASU 2018-07 is effective for Public entities in annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those years (first quarter of 2019 for the company). Early adoption is permitted, including in an interim period, but not before an entity adopts the new revenue guidance (which was adopted by the Company in its interim financial statements for 2018).
An entity should only remeasure liability-classified awards that have not been settled by the date of adoption and equity-classified awards for which a measurement date has not been established through a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. Upon transition, the entity is required to measure these nonemployee awards at fair value as of the adoption date.

The adoption of ASU 2018-07 did not have a significant impact on its consolidated financial statements.

2.Accounting Standards Update 2016-02, “Leases”

In February 2016, the FASB issued its new lease accounting guidance in Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842).

Under the new guidance, lessees will be required to recognize the following for all leases (with the exception of short-term leases) at the commencement date: 1. A lease liability, which is a lessee‘s obligation to make lease payments arising from a lease, measured on a discounted basis; and, 2. A right-of-use asset, which is an asset that represents the lessee’s right to use, or control the use of, a specified asset for the lease term.

Under the new guidance, lessor accounting is largely unchanged. Certain targeted improvements were made to align, where necessary, lessor accounting with the lessee accounting model and Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. The new lease guidance simplified the accounting for sale and leaseback transactions primarily because lessees must recognize lease assets and lease liabilities. Lessees will no longer be provided with a source of off-balance sheet financing. 

Public business entities should apply the amendments in ASU 2016-02 for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years (i.e., January 1, 2019, for a calendar year Company). Early application is permitted for all public business entities upon issuance.

The company applied the modified retrospective transition approach for leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements. The modified retrospective approach do not require any transition accounting for leases that expired before the earliest comparative period presented. Lessees and lessors may not apply a full retrospective transition approach.
The new standard also provides practical expedients for an entity’s ongoing accounting. The company elected the short-term lease recognition exemption for all leases with a term shorter than 12 months. This means, for those leases, the company does not recognize ROU assets or lease liabilities, including not recognizing ROU assets or lease liabilities for existing short-term leases of those assets in transition. In addition, the company also elected the transition expedient for short-term leases. Accordingly, the new guidance was not applied for leases that has a term of 12 or fewer months at commencement and does not have a purchase option that the lessee is reasonably certain to exercise.
Upon adoption, the company recognized total right of use (“ROU”) assets of $225 thousand, with corresponding liabilities of $225 thousand on the condensed consolidated balance sheets. The adoption did not impact our beginning retained earnings, or our prior year condensed consolidated statements of income and statements of cash flows.
Under Topic 842, we determine if an arrangement is a lease at inception. ROU assets and liabilities are recognized at commencement date based on the present value of remaining lease payments over the lease term. For this purpose, we consider only payments that are fixed and determinable at the time of commencement. As our leases do not provide an implicit rate, we use our incremental borrowing rate based on the information available at commencement date in determining the present value of lease payments. The incremented borrowing rate is the expected interest rate that the company would have to pay to borrow on a collateralized basis on a similar term and amounts equal to the lease payment and under similar economic environment. The ROU asset also includes any lease payments made prior to commencement and is recorded net of any lease incentives received. Our lease terms may include options to extend or terminate the lease when it is reasonably certain that we will exercise such options.

Operating leases are included in operating lease right-of-use assets, operating lease liabilities, current and operating lease liabilities, non-current on our condensed consolidated balance sheets.

See also Note 5.

 

Results of Operations

 

The following discussion of our operating results explains material changes in our results of operations for the three-month period ended March 31, 20182019 compared with the same period ended March 31, 2017.2018. The discussion should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this report.

 

Revenues

 

During the three-month period ended March 31, 2018,2019, we had revenues of $28,209$25,562 from orders for our GlucoTrack® model DF-F glucose monitoring device and PECs that are replaced every six months, as compared with $96,237$28,209 for the prior-yearprior-year’s period. DuringThere was no material change in the first quarter of 2017 we received an initial order from a customer in Hong Kong.revenues between the two periods.

 

We recognize revenues from sales of the GlucoTrack® model DF-F and PECs when control is transferred to the customer and collectability is probable.

 

Research and development expenses

 

Research and development expenses were $592,697$425,117 for the three-month period ended March 31, 2018,2019, as compared to $581,539$592,697 for the prior-yearprior-year’s period. There was no material changeThe decrease is mainly attributable to the completion of our clinical trials for the current version of the DF-F during 2018 and the decrease in researchsalary and developmentother personnel-related expenses, betweenincluding stock-based compensation expenses during the two periods.first quarter of 2019.

 

Research and development expenses consist primarily of salaries and other personnel-related expenses, including stock-based compensation expenses, materials, travel expenses, clinical trials and other expenses. Subject to the receipt of additional funds to finance our operations (of which there can be no assurance), we expect research and development expenses to increase during the remainder of 20182019 and beyond, primarily due to hiring additional personnel and developing our product line, as well as improvement of the GlucoTrack® model DF-F; however, we may adjust or allocate the level of our research and development expenses based on available financial resources and based on our commercial needs including the FDA registration process, specific requirements from customers, development of new GlucoTrack® models and others.

Selling and marketing expenses

 

Selling and marketing expenses were $308,637$125,343 for the three-month period ended March 31, 2018,2019, as compared to $236,939$308,637 for the prior-yearprior-year’s period.The increasedecrease is primarily attributable to the hiringCompany’s decision to reduce its business development personnel in the European market until such a time when the proof of a newconcept of obtaining reimbursement for the product in test markets is realized. In addition during the fourth quarter 0f 2018, our Chief Commercialization Officer during the second quarter of 2017.was appointed as our President and Chief Operating Officer and as a result his salary and related benefits expenses were allocated to our General and administrative expenses.

 

Selling and marketing expenses consist primarily of professional services, salaries, travel expenses and other related expenses. Subject to the receipt of additional funds to finance our operations (of which there can be no assurance), we expect selling and marketing expenses to increase during the remainder of 2018in 2019 and beyond as we continue our focus on marketing and sales of the GlucoTrack® model DF-F; however, we may adjust or allocate the level of our marketing based on available financial resources and based on our commercial needs including the FDA registration process, specific requirements from customers, development of new GlucoTrack® models and others.DF-F.

 

General and administrative expenses

 

General and administrative expenses were $1,036,684$500,155 for the three-month period ended March 31, 2018,2019, as compared to $1,877,359$1,036,684 for the prior-yearprior-year’s period. The decrease is primarily attributable to severance paid tothe departure of our former ChairmanCEO, a reduction in professional fees and CEO and former CFOthe reduction of approximately $162,000stock based compensation during the first quarter of 2017. In addition, the decrease is attributable to a one time signing bonus of $412,500 including employer payroll taxes and stock-based compensation in the amount of approximately $303,000 paid to our new Chairman and CEO, recruiting fees of $295,000 and the related professional fees associated with the changes in management, which occurred during the first quarter of 2017.2019.

 

General and administrative expenses consist primarily of professional services, salaries, travel expenses and other related expenses for executive, finance and administrative personnel, including stock-based compensation expenses. Other general and administrative costs and expenses include facility-related costs not otherwise included in research and development costs and expenses, and professional fees for legal and accounting services. Subject to the receipt of additional funds to finance our operations (of which there can be no assurance), we expect general and administrative expenses to increase during the remainder of 2018 and beyond.

Financing income, net

 

Financing income, net was $62,015$3,400 for the three-month period ended March 31, 2018,2019, as compared to $69,275$62,015 for the prior-yearprior-year’s period. The change is primarily attributable to changes in fair market value adjustments relating to our Warrantsthe early adoption of ASU 2017-12. Until the early adoption of ASU 2017-12 we marked the warrants with down-round protection. In accordance with U.S. GAAP, we mark the warrantsdown round protection to market on a quarterly basis based on the fair value estimate derived by using a binomial pricingBlack and Scholes model, with the changes in fair value recognized as finance expense or income, as applicable, in our consolidated statement of operations. As a result of the early adoption of ASU 2017-12 we reclassified the warrants with down round protection from long term liabilities to stockholders deficit and stopped marking them to market on a quarterly basis. The decrease in the estimated fair value of our Warrants with down-round protection during the three-month period ended March 31, 2018 and 2017 amounted to $77,947, and $84,099, respectively, resulting primarily from the decrease in the expected term of Warrants and the changes in the estimated expected volatility.

 

Net Loss

 

Net loss was $1,847,794$1,021,653 for the three-month period ended March 31, 2018,2019, as compared to $2,530,325$1,847,794 for the prior-yearprior-year’s period. The decrease in net loss is attributable primarily to the decrease in all of our general and administrative expenses, as described above.

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

As of March 31, 2018,2019, cash on hand was approximately $314,000.$31,000 and long-term restricted cash was approximately $54,000. During the first quarter of 2018,2019, we received aggregate net proceeds of approximately $1.7 million$756 thousand (net of related cash expenses), from the issuance and sale in a private placement transaction of 435,556200,652 Series D Units. While we expect to generate additional cash from sales, we do not anticipate that our income from operations will be sufficient to sustain our operations in the next 12 months. Based on our current cash burn rate, strategy and operating plan, we believe that our cash and cash equivalents will enable us to operate for a period of less than one month from the date of this report. In order to fund our anticipated liquidity needs beyond such period (or possibly earlier if our current cash burn rate, strategy or operating plan change in a way that accelerates or increases our liquidity needs), we will need to raise additional capital.

We have a credit line with Bank HaPoalim of NIS 150,000 (approximately $42,686 based on the exchange rate of 3.514 NIS/dollar as of March 31, 2018). Borrowings under the line of credit are secured by our funds on deposit with the bank at the time of borrowing, which generally must be sufficient to cover the principal amount of the borrowings in full.

Messrs. Avner Gal and Zvi Cohen collectively loaned Integrity Israel NIS 176,000 ($50,08548,458 based on the same exchange rate)rate of 3.632 NIS/dollar as of March 31, 2019) on May 15, 2002 pursuant to a board approval. Messrs. Nir Tarlovsky, Yitzhak Fisher and Asher Kugler loaned Integrity Israel NIS 336,300 ($95,70392,594 based on the same exchange rate) on March 16, 2004.2004 . As of March 31, 2019, the outstanding balances on these loans were $57,578 and $116,539, respectively. These loans are not required to be repaid until the first year in which we realize profits in our annual statement of operations (accounting profit). At such time, the loans are to be repaid on a quarterly basis in an amount equal to 10% of our total sales in the relevant quarter, beginning on the quarter following the first year in which we realize profits in our annual statement of operations. The total amount to be repaid by us to each lender shall be an amount equal to the aggregate principal amount loaned by such lender to us, plus an amount equal to the product of the amount of each payment made by us in respect of such loan multiplied by the percentage difference between the Israeli Consumer Price Index on the date on which the loan was made and the Israeli Consumer Price Index on the date of such payment. However, notwithstanding the above-mentioned mechanism, we will not be required to repay the loans during any time when such repayment would cause a deficit in our working capital. Our Board of Directors is entitled to modify the repayment terms of these loans, so long as such modification does not discriminate against any particular lender, and provided that all payments must be allocated among the lenders on a pro-rata basis.

 

Integrity Israel is required to pay royalties to the Office of the Chief Scientist of the Ministry of Industry, Trade and Labor of the State of Israel at a rate ranging between 3-5% of 3% from the proceeds from the sale of the Company’s products arising from the development plan up to an amount equal to $93,300, plus interest at LIBOR from the date of grant. As of March 31, 2018,2019, the contingent liability with respect to royalty payment on future sales equaled approximately $34,717,$48,812, excluding interest.

 

25

Net Cash Used in Operating Activities for the Three-Month Periods Ended March 31, 20182019 and March 31, 20172018

 

Net cash used in operating activities was $1,426,868$821,023 and $1,146,113$1,426,868 for the three-month periods ended March 31, 20182019 and 2017,2018, respectively. Net cash used in operating activities primarily reflects the net loss for those periods of $1,847,794$1,021,653 and $2,530,325, respectively, increased$1,847,794, respectively. The company also incurred a reduction in the stock based compensation of $382,895 between the two periods related to the departure of its former CEO. In addition, the decrease by non-cash changes in fair value of Warrants with down-round protection of $77,947, and $84,099, respectively and partially offset by the increase of $187,302 related to stock-based compensation as described above in general and administrative expenses. Net cash used in operating activities was also partially offset by changes in operating assets and liabilities in the amounts of $283,276 and $873,678, respectively. The decrease in operating assets and liabilities during the three-month period ended March 31, 2018 resulted primarily from decrease in our current liabilities as a result of deferral of the payment of the one-time signing bonus to our new Chairman and CEO which was paid during the second quarter of 2017.

 

Net Cash Used in Investing Activities for the Three-Month Periods Ended March 31, 20182019 and March 31, 20172018

 

Net cash used in investing activities was $931$6,378 and $1,477$931 for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2018,2019, and 2017,2018, respectively, and was used to purchase equipment (such as computers, R&D and office equipment).

 

Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities for the Three-Month Periods Ended March 31, 20182019 and March 31, 20172018

 

Net cash provided by financing activities was $1,697,700$756,111 and $2,599,071$1,697,700 for the three-month period ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, and 2017, respectively.Cash provided by financing activities for thethree-month period ended March 31, 2019 and March 31, 2018reflected net capital raised from the issuance of Series D Units.Cash used in financing activities for the three-month period ended March 31, 2017reflected net capital raised from the issuance of Series C Units.

 

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

 

As of March 31, 2018,2019, we did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements as defined in Item 303(a)(4) of Regulation S-K.

 

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

 

Not required for smaller reporting companies.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures.

 

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

 

Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officerpresident and our Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of March 31, 2018.2019. The term “disclosure controls and procedures,” as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act, means controls and other procedures of a company that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the company’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives and management necessarily applies its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. Based on the evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of March 31, 2018,2019, our Chief Executive Officerpresident and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of such date, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level.

 

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

 

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during our most recent fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings.

We are not presently a party to any material litigation. We may, however, become involved in litigation from time to time relating to claims arising in the ordinary course of our business. These claims, even if not meritorious, could result in the expenditure of significant financial and managerial resources.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

 

Offering of Series D Units

 

On May 10, 2018,During the three-month period ending on March 31, 2019, the Company received aggregate gross proceeds of $517,000 in the fifth closing of$902,920 from the private placement of its securities from sevento accredited investors. The Company issued to the investors an aggregate of 114,888200,652 units of the Company (each a “Series DUnit”), each consisting of (a) one share of the Company’s Common Stock, (b) a five year warrant to purchase, at an exercise price of $4.50$1.80 per share, one share of Common Stock, (c) a five year warrant to purchase, at an exercise price of $5.75$3.60 per share, one share of Common Stock, and (d) a five year warrant to purchase, at an exercise price of $7.75$5.40 per share, one share of Common Stock.

 

Issuance of Non-Qualified Stock Options to Employees

 

On February 15, 2018,January 1, 2019, we issued a ten-year non-qualified stock option to various employees,our President and Chief Operating Officer, for the purchase of 767,50075,000 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $4.50 per share, with three-year quarterly vesting commencing on the first quarter after the effective date.date

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

None

25

Item 6. Exhibits.

 

Exhibit No. Description
3.1 Certificate of Incorporation of Integrity Applications, Inc. (1)
3.2 Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation of Integrity Applications, Inc. (1)
4.1 Form of Series D Securities Purchase Agreement (2)
4.2 Form of Series D-1 Common Stock Purchase Warrant (2)
4.3 Form of Series D-2 Common Stock Purchase Warrant (2)
4.4 Form of Series D-3 Common Stock Purchase Warrant (2)
4.5 Form of Series D Registration Rights Agreement (2)
10.1 * Amendment No. 3 to Integrity Applications, Inc. 2010 Incentive Compensation Plan (3)
31.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Filed herewith)
31.2 Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Filed herewith)
32.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Furnished herewith)
32.2 Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Furnished herewith)
101.INS XBRL Instance Document (4)
101.SCH XBRL Schema Document (4)
101.CAL XBRL Calculation Linkbase Document (4)
101.LAB XBRL Label Linkbase Document (4)
101.PRE XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document (4)
101.DEF XBRL Definition Linkbase Document (4)

(1)Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, as filed with the SEC on August 22, 2011,November 7, 2017, which exhibit is incorporated herein by reference.
(2)Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, as filed with the SEC on March 7, 2018, which exhibit is incorporated herein by reference
(3)Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, as filed with the SEC on March 23, 2018, which exhibit is incorporated herein by reference.
(4)Pursuant to Rule 402 of Regulation S-T, the interactive files on Exhibit 101 hereto are deemed not filed for purposes of Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, are deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to liability under those sections, and are not part of any registration statement to which they relate.

*Compensation Plan or Arrangement or Management Contract.

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 

Dated: May 15, 20182019

 

 INTEGRITY APPLICATIONS, INC.
  
 By:/s/ John GrahamDavid Podwalski
 Name:John GrahamDavid Podwalski
 TitleChairman of the Board

Director, President and Chief ExecutiveOperating Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)

 By:/s/ Sami Sassoun
 Name:Sami Sassoun
 Title

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Accounting Officer)