UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended: March 31, 20182019

[  ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number: 000-09047

QUEST SOLUTION, INCINC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

860 Conger Street

Eugene, OR 97402
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

(714) 899-4800

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

N/A

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES [X] NO [  ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). YES [X] NO [  ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer”filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “smaller reporting“emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. [  ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). YES [  ] NO [X]

APPLICABLE ONLY TO ISSUERS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDINGS DURING THE PRECEDING FIVE YEARS:

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Sections 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court. YES [  ] NO [  ]

APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common equity, as of the latest practicable date: 39,673,63177,009,547 shares of common stock, $0.001 par value, as of May 18, 2018June 27, 2019.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

QUEST SOLUTION, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(UNAUDITED)

The accompanying unaudited notes to the financials should be read in conjunction with these condensed
consolidated financial statements.

QUEST SOLUTION, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

(UNAUDITED)

The accompanying unaudited notes to the financials should be read in conjunction with these condensed consolidated financial statements.

QUEST SOLUTION, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSSSTOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(UNAUDITED)

The accompanying unaudited notes to the financials should be read in conjunction with these condensed
consolidated financial statements.

QUEST SOLUTION, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOW

(UNAUDITED)

The accompanying unaudited notes to the financials should be read in conjunction with these condensed
consolidated financial statements.

QUEST SOLUTION, INC

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(UNAUDITED)

NOTE 1 – BASIS OF PRESENTATIONAND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES-

BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION

The interim consolidated financial statements of Quest Solution, Inc. include the combined accounts of Quest Marketing, Inc., an Oregon Corporation, and Quest Exchange Ltd., a Canadian based holding company.company, HTS Image Processing, Inc., a Delaware corporation, HTS (USA), Inc., a Delaware corporation and HTS Image Ltd. (f/k/a Teamtronics Ltd.), an Israeli corporation.

On December 31, 2016, the Company acquired one hundred percent (100%) of the shares of Bar Code Specialties, Inc. (“BCS”) and merged BCS ininto Quest Marketing to form one US legal entity as part of its streamlining efforts.

The interim consolidated financial statements included herein, presented in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles and stated in US dollars, have been prepared by the Company, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations, although the Company believes that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading.

These statements reflect all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, which, in the opinion of management, are necessary for fair presentation of the information contained therein. It is suggested that these interim financial statements be read in conjunction with the financial statements of the Company for the year ended December 31, 20172018 and notes thereto included in the Company’s Form 10-K filed with the SEC on May 8, 2018.June 5, 2019. The Company follows the same accounting policies in the preparation of interim reports, except for the adoption of ASC Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. The Company operates in one segment.

Operating results for the three months ended March 31, 20182019 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ended December 31, 2018.2019.

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

This summary of significant accounting policies of Quest Solution, Inc. is presented to assist in understanding the Company’s consolidated financial statements. The consolidated financial statements and notes are representations of the Company’s management who is responsible for the integrity and objectivity of the financial statements. These accounting policies conform to generally accepted accounting principles and have been consistently applied in the preparation of the financial statements.

RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

Adoption of New Accounting Pronouncement in Fiscal 20182019

In May 2014, the FASB issued new revenue recognition guidance under ASU 2014-09 that supersedes the existing revenue recognition guidance under U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”). The new standard, ASC Topic 606, focuses on creating a single source of revenue guidance for revenue arising from contracts with customers for all industries. The objective of ASC Topic 606, the new standard, is for companies to recognize revenue when it transfers the promised goods or services to its customers at an amount that represents what the company expects to be entitled to in exchange for those goods or services. Since the issuance of the original standard, the FASB has issued several other subsequent updates including the following: 1) clarification of the implementation guidance on principal versus agent considerations (ASU 2016-08); 2) further guidance on identifying performance obligations in a contract as well as clarifications on the licensing implementation guidance (ASU 2016-10); 3) rescission of several SEC Staff Announcements that are codified in Topic 605 (ASU 2016-11); and 4) additional guidance and practical expedients in response to identified implementation issues (ASU 2016-12). The Company took into the guidance provided in these ASUs related to revenue recognition.

The Company has adopted ASC Topic 606 as of January 1, 2018 using the modified retrospective transition approach, in which the cumulative effect of applying the standard would be recognized at the date of initial application. An adjustment to decrease deferred revenue in the amount of $1,213,218 was established on the date of adoption relating to amounts deferred related to extended service contract sales through December 31, 2017. Prior to adoption of ASC Topic 606 net revenue from the sales of these contracts would be recognized immediately since the Company has no continuing obligation related to the sale of these products if the new guidance had been applied in the past. As a result of the adoption the Company recognizes revenue from extended service contracts on a net versus gross basis in the consolidated statements of operations. The Company recognized the cumulative effect of initially applying ASC Topic 606 as an adjustment of $1,213,218 of net deferred revenue to the opening balance of accumulated deficit.

Under this approach, revenue for 2017 is reported in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income on the historical basis, and revenue for 2018 is reported in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income under ASC Topic 606. A comparison of revenue for 2018 periods to the historical basis is included below. The Company acknowledges that the required adoption of ASC Topic 606 could have a material effect on annual revenue or net income from continuing operations on an ongoing basis.

RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In January 2017,July 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04,2018-10Intangibles – GoodwillLeases (Topic 842),Codification Improvements and OtherASU 2018-11Leases (Topic 350)842), Targeted Improvements, to provide additional guidance for the adoption of Topic 842. ASU 2018-10 clarifies certain provisions and correct unintended applications of the guidance such as the application of implicit rate, lessee reassessment of lease classification, and certain transition adjustments that will eliminateshould be recognized to earnings rather than to stockholders’ equity. ASU 2018-11 provides an alternative transition method and practical expedient for separating contract components for the requirementadoption of Topic 842.In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02Leases (Topic 842) which requires an entity to calculate the implied fair value of goodwill to measurerecognize assets and liabilities arising from a goodwill impairment charge. Instead, impairment charge will be based on the excess of a reporting unit’s carrying amount over its fair value. The guidance islease for both financing and operating leases with terms greater than 12 months. ASU 2018-11, ASU 2018-10, and ASU 2016-02 (collectively, “the new lease standards”) are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. We adopted the Company instandard on January 1, 2019 by applying the first quarternew lease requirements utilizing the Effective Date Method for all leases with terms greater than 12 months. We elected the package of fiscal 2023. Early adoption is permitted.practical expedients permitted under the transition guidance within the new standard, which included carrying forward historical assessments of: (1) whether contracts are or contain leases, (2) lease classification and (3) initial direct costs. The early adoption of this guidancestandard resulted in the recognition of right-of-use assets of $237,731 and additional lease liabilities of $237,731 as of January 1, 2019. The adoption of the standard did not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements, absent any goodwill impairment.our operating results or cash flows.

In January 2017,July 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying2018-09,Codification Improvements.The amendments in ASU 2018-09 affect a wide variety of Topics in the DefinitionFASB Codification and apply to all reporting entities within the scope of a Business. Thisthe affected accounting guidance. The Company has evaluated ASU 2018-09 in its entirety and determined that the amendments related to Topic 718-740,Compensation-Stock Compensation-Income Taxes, are the only provisions that currently apply to the Company. The amendments in ASU 2018-09 related to Topic 718-740,Compensation-Stock Compensation-Income Taxes, clarify that an entity should recognize excess tax benefits related to stock compensation transactions in the period in which the amount of the deduction is determined. The amendments in ASU 2018-09 related to Topic 718-740 are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. The adoption of the new standard clarifiesdid not have a current impact on the definitionCompany’s Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

In June 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-07,Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Nonemployee Share-Based Payment Accounting, to expand the scope of a businessTopic 718 to include share-based payment transactions for acquiring goods and provides a screenservices from nonemployees and supersedes the guidance in Subtopic 505-50,Equity - Equity-Based Payments to determine when an integrated setNon-Employees. Under ASU 2018-07, equity-classified nonemployee share-based payment awards are measured at the grant date fair value on the grant date. The probability of assets and activitiessatisfying performance conditions must be considered for equity-classified nonemployee share-based payment awards with such conditions. ASU 2018-07 is not a business.effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. The screen requires that when substantially alladoption of the fair value of the gross assets acquired (or disposed of) is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or a group of similar identifiable assets, the set is not a business. This new standard will be effectivedid not have a current impact on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for the Company on January 1, 2018; however, early adoption is permitted with prospective application to any business development transaction.

period ended March 31, 2019.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230):Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments (“ASU 2016-15”). ASU 2016-15 reduces diversity in practice in how certain transactions are classified in the statement of cash flows. The amendments in ASU 2016-15 provide guidance on specific cash flow issues including debt prepayment or debt extinguishment costs, settlement of zero-coupon debt instruments or other debt instruments with coupon interest rates that are insignificant in relation to the effective interest rate of the borrowing, contingent consideration payments made after a business combination, proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims, proceeds from the settlement of corporate-owned life insurance policies, and distributions received from equity method investees. ASU 2016-15 is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The adoption did not materially impact our consolidated financial statements and results of operations

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13,Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (“ASU 2016-13”). ASU 2016-13 changes the impairment model for most financial assets and certain other instruments, including trade and other receivables, held-to-maturity debt securities and loans, and requires entities to use a new forward-looking expected loss model that will result in the earlier recognition of allowance for losses. This update is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted for a fiscal year beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within that fiscal year. Entities will apply the standard’s provisions as a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the first reporting period in which the guidance is adopted. We are currently assessing the potential impact of ASU 2016-13 on our consolidated financial statements and results of operations.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13,Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (“ASU 2016-13”). ASU 2016-13 changes the impairment model for most financial assets and certain other instruments, including trade and other receivables, held-to-maturity debt securities and loans, and requires entities to use a new forward-looking expected loss model that will result in the earlier recognition of allowance for losses. This update is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted for a fiscal year beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within that fiscal year. Entities will apply the standard’s provisions as a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the first reporting period in which the guidance is adopted. We are currently assessing the potential impact of ASU 2016-13 on our consolidated financial statements and results of operations.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02 amended the existing accounting standards for lease accounting and requiring lessees to recognize lease assets and lease liabilities for all leases with lease terms of more than 12 months, including those classified as operating leases. Both the asset and liability will initially be measured at the present value of the future minimum lease payments, with the asset being subject to adjustments such as initial direct costs. Consistent with current U.S GAAP, the presentation of expenses and cash flows will depend primarily on the classification of the lease as either a finance or an operating lease. The new standard also requires additional quantitative and qualitative disclosures regarding the amount, timing and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases in order to provide additional information about the nature of an organization’s leasing activities. This ASU is effective for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2018 and requires modified retrospective application. Early adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact of the new guidance on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

The Company has evaluated other recent pronouncements and believes that none of them will have a material effect on the Company’s financial statements.

CASH

Cash consists of petty cash, checking, savings, and money market accounts. For the purpose of the statements of cash flows, all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less are considered to be cash equivalents. There were no cash equivalents as of March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017.

The Company maintains its cash in bank deposit accounts which, at times, may exceed federal insured limits.

The Company has restricted cash on deposit with a federally insured bank in the amount of $381,494 at March 31, 2018. This cash is security and collateral for a corporate credit card agreement with a bank and for deposit against a letter of credit issued for executive life insurance policies owned by the Company.

USE OF ESTIMATES

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Certain accounting policies involve judgments and uncertainties to such an extent that there is reasonable likelihood that materially different amounts could have been reported under different conditions, or if different assumptions had been used. The Company evaluates its estimates and assumptions on a regular basis. The Company uses historical experience and various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances to form the basis for making judgments about carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may materially differ from these estimates and assumptions used in preparation of the consolidated financial statements.

ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE

Accounts receivable are carried at their estimated collectible amounts. The Company provides allowances for uncollectible accounts receivable equal to the estimated collection losses that will be incurred in collection of all receivables. Accounts receivable are periodically evaluated for collectability based on past credit history with customers and their current financial condition. The Company’s management determines which accounts are past due and if deemed uncollectible, the Company charges off the receivable in the period the determination is made. The Company generally requires no collateral to secure its ordinary accounts receivable. Based on management’s evaluation, accounts receivable has a balance in the allowance for doubtful accounts of $12,501 and $12,501 for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and for the year ended December 31, 2017, respectively.

GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS

Intangible assets are stated at cost, net of accumulated amortization. The assets are being amortized on the straight-line method over useful lives ranging from 3 to 711 years. Amortization expense for the period ended March 31, 20182019 and December 31, 20172018 was $425,429$542,309 and $1,701,714,$1,784,390, respectively.

The future amortization expense on the Trade Names and Customer Relationships are as follows:

Goodwill

Goodwill is the excess of the purchase price paid over the fair value of the net assets of the acquired business. Goodwill is tested annually at December 31 for impairment. The annual qualitative or quantitative assessments involve determining an estimate of the fair value of reporting units in order to evaluate whether an impairment of the current carrying amount of goodwill exists. A qualitative assessment evaluates whether it is more likely than not that a reporting unit’s fair value is less than its carrying amount before applying the two-step quantitative goodwill impairment test. The first step of a quantitative goodwill impairment test compares the fair value of the reporting unit to its carrying amount including goodwill. If the carrying amount of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, an impairment loss may be recognized. The amount of impairment loss is determined by comparing the implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill with the carrying amount. If the carrying amount exceeds the implied fair value then an impairment loss is recognized equal to that excess. No impairment charges have been recorded as a result of the Company’s annual impairment assessments. The Company has adopted the provisions of ASU 2017-04—Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment. ASU 2017-04 requires goodwill impairments to be measured on the basis of the fair value of a reporting unit relative to the reporting unit’s carrying amount rather than on the basis of the implied amount of goodwill relative to the goodwill balance of the reporting unit. Thus, ASU 2017-04 permits an entity to record a goodwill impairment that is entirely or partly due to a decline in the fair value of other assets that, under existing GAAP, would not be impaired or have a reduced carrying amount. Furthermore, the ASU removes “the requirements for any reporting unit with a zero or negative carrying amount to perform a qualitative assessment and, if it fails that qualitative test, to perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test.” Instead, all reporting units, even those with a zero or negative carrying amount will apply the same impairment test. Accordingly, the goodwill of reporting unit or entity with zero or negative carrying values will not be impaired, even when conditions underlying the reporting unit/entity may indicate that goodwill is impaired.

We test our goodwill for impairment annually, or, under certain circumstances, more frequently, such as when events or circumstances indicate there may be impairment. We are required to write down the value of goodwill only when our testing determines the recorded amount of goodwill exceeds the fair value. Our annual measurement date for testing goodwill impairment is December 31.

None of the goodwill is deductible for income tax purposes.

Intangibles

Intangible assets with finite useful lives consist of Trademark and customer lists and are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives, which range from two to seven years. The estimated useful lives associated with finite-lived intangible assets are consistent with the estimated lives of the associated products and may be modified when circumstances warrant. Such assets are reviewed for impairment when events or circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable. An impairment loss would be recognized when estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to result from the use of an asset and its eventual disposition are less than its carrying amount. The amount of any impairment is measured as the difference between the carrying amount and the fair value of the impaired asset. There was no impairment recorded for the three months ended March 31, 2018.

ADVERTISING

The Company generally expenses advertising costs as incurred. During the three month periods ended March 31, 2018 and 2017, the Company spent $39,008 and $188,077 on advertising (marketing, trade show and store front expense), net of co-operative rebates, respectively. The Company received rebates on advertising from co-operative advertising agreements with several vendors and suppliers. These rebates have been recorded as a reduction to the related advertising and marketing expense in the periods they are received.

INVENTORY

Substantially all inventory consists of raw materials and finished goods and are valued based upon first-in first-out (“FIFO”) cost, not in excess of market. The determination of whether the carrying amount of inventory requires a write-down is based on a detailed evaluation of inventory relative to any potential slow moving products or discontinued items as well as the market conditions for the specific inventory items.

FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

Fair value is the price that would be received from selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants as of the measurement date. Applicable accounting guidance provides a hierarchy for inputs used in measuring fair value that prioritize the use of observable inputs over the use of unobservable inputs, when such observable inputs are available. The three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value are as follows:

Assets and liabilities are classified based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurements. The Company reviews the fair value hierarchy classification on a quarterly basis. Changes in the observable inputs may result in a reclassification of assets and liabilities within the three levels of the hierarchy outlined above.

NET LOSS PER COMMON SHARE

Net loss per share is provided in accordance with FASB ASC 260-10, “Earnings per Share”.Share.” Basic net loss per common share (“EPS”) is computed by dividing income available to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average shares outstanding, assuming all dilutive potential common shares were issued, unless doing so is anti-dilutive. The weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for computing basic EPS for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018 were 71,681,522 and 2017 were 37,125,286, and 35,141,560, respectively. Diluted net loss per share of common stock is the same as basic net loss per share of common stock because the effects of potentially dilutive securities are antidilutive.

Dilutive securities are excluded from the computation of diluted net loss per share because such securities have no anti-dilutive impact due to losses reported.

The following table sets forth the potentially dilutive securities excluded from the computation of diluted net loss per share because such securities have an anti-dilutive impact due to losses reported, as of March 31,: 

FOREIGN CURRENCY TRANSLATION

The consolidated financial statements of the Company are presented in U.S. dollars. The functional currency for the Company and each of its subsidiaries (“Quest US entities”), except HTS LTD is U.S. dollars. The functional currency of HTS LTD is Israeli Shekel. Transactions in currencies other than the functional currency are recorded using the appropriate exchange rate at the time of the transaction. All of the Company’sFor Quest US entities, continuing operations are conducted in U.S. dollars. The Company owns a non-operating subsidiary in Canada, from which it has no activity since October 1, 2016. For HTS LTD is an Israeli Company whose continuing operations are conducted in Israeli Shekel.

Reclassifications and adjustments — Certain prior year amounts in the condensed consolidated interim financial statements have been reclassified to conform with current year presentation.The impact of the reclassifications made to prior year amounts is not material and did not affect net loss.

NOTE 2 – GOING CONCERN

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As of March 31, 2018,2019, the Company had a working capital deficit of $13,803,498$20,880,835 and an accumulated deficit of $35,338,906.$40,431,495. The Company’s continuation as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to generate sufficient cash flow to meet its obligations on a timely basis. Management’s plan to eliminate the going concern situation includes, but is not limited to, the continuation of improving cash flow, maintaining moderate cost reductions (subsequent to aggressive cost reduction actions already taken in 20172018 and in the first quarter of 2018)2019), the creation of additional sales and profits across its product lines, and the obtaining of sufficient financing to restructure current debt in a manner more in line with the Company’s improving cash flow and cost reduction successes.

The matters that resulted in 2017,2018 having substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern, have been somewhat mitigated by the successful debt reduction settlements finalized in December of 2017 as detailed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on May 8, 2018.June 5, 2019. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

NOTE 3 – CONCENTRATIONS

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to a concentration of credit risk consist primarily of cash, accounts receivable, and accounts payable. Beginning January 1, 2015, all of our cash balances were insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) up to $250,000 per depositor at each financial institution. This coverage is available at all FDIC member institutions. The Company uses Wells Fargo Bank, which is an FDIC insured institution. The restricted cash in the amount of $381,494 at March 31, 2018 is in excess of the FDIC limit.

For the three months and year ended March 31, 20182019 and December 31, 2017,2018, one customer accounted for 30.5%21.4% and 15.7%17.0% of the Company’s revenues, respectively.

Accounts receivable at March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017 are made up of trade receivables due from customers in the ordinary course of business. One customer made up 20.5% and another customer 15.7% of the trade accounts receivable balances at March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively.

Accounts payable are made up of payables due to vendors in the ordinary course of business at March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017. One vendor made up 59.4% and 70.1%, respectively of the outstanding balance, which represented greater than 10% of accounts payable at March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively.

NOTE 4 – ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLEBUSINESS ACQUISITION

At March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, accounts receivable consisted of the following:

NOTE 5 – INVENTORYHTS Image Processing, Inc. acquisition

At March 31,On October 5, 2018 (“Closing Date”), the Company entered into the HTS Purchase Agreement with Walefar and December 31, 2017, inventories consistedCampbeltown, (Walefar and Campbeltown are collectively referred to as the “Sellers”). Pursuant to the HTS Purchase Agreement, the Company purchased 100% of the following:capital stock of HTS Image Processing, Inc., and HTS’s wholly owned subsidiaries HTS USA, Inc. and HTS Image Ltd. (f/k/a Teamtronics Ltd.), from the Sellers.

NOTE 6 – FIXED ASSETSPro forma results of operations

Fixed assets are stated at cost, netThe following pro forma results of accumulated depreciation. Depreciation expenseoperations for the periodthree months ended March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017 was $11,969 and $61,223, respectivelyhave been prepared as though the business acquisition had occurred as of January 1, 2018. This pro forma financial information is not indicative of the results of operations that the Company would have attained had the acquisition occurred at the beginning of the periods presented, nor is the pro forma financial information indicative of the results of operations that may occur in the future:

NOTE 75 – OTHER LIABILITIES

At March 31, 20182019 and December 31, 2017,2018, other liabilities consisted of the following:

NOTE 86 – CREDIT FACILITIES AND LINE OF CREDIT

On July 1, 2016, the Company entered into a Factoring and Security Agreement (the “FASA”) with Action Capital Corporation (“Action”) to establish a sale of accounts facility, whereby the Company may obtain short-term financing by selling and assigning to Action acceptable accounts receivable. Pursuant to the FASA, the outstanding principal amount of advances made by Action to the Company at any time shall not exceed $5,000,000. Action will reserve and withhold an amount in a reserve account equal to 5% of the face amount of each account purchased under the FASA. The balance outstanding under the Action credit line at March 31, 20182019 was $4,832,353$796,952 and $4,533,575 at December 31, 2017 $3,667,4172018, which includes accrued interest.

The per annum interest rate with respect to the daily average balance of unpaid advances outstanding under the FASA (computed on a monthly basis) will be equal to the “Prime Rate” of Wells Fargo Bank N.A. plus 2%, plus a monthly fee equal to 0.75% of such average outstanding balance. The Company shall also pay all other costs incurred by Action under the FASA, including all bank fees. The FASA will continue in full force and effect unless terminated by either party upon 30 days’ prior written notice. Performance of the Company’s obligations under the FASA is secured by a security interest in certain collateral of the Company. The FASA includes customary representations and warranties and default provisions for transactions of this type.

NOTE 97 - NOTES PAYABLE

Notes payable at March 31, 20182019 and December 31, 2017,2018, consists of the following:

Future maturities of notes payable as of March 31, 20182019 are as follows;

In connection with the BCS’ acquisition, the Company assumed a related party note payable to the former CTO of the RFID division of BCS. The note is payable in equal monthly installments of $4,758 beginning October 31, 2014 and ended October 2018. The loan bears interest at 1.89%1.84% and is unsecured and subordinated to the Company’s bank debt. The balance on this loan at March 31, 2019 and March 31, 2018 was $130,294 and $130,294 respectively, of which all of it was classified as long term. In July 2016, the holder of the note signed a subordination agreement with the Supplier of the Secured Promissory Note and Action Capital, whereby the noteholder agrees to subordinate its right to payment of capital and interest until the Supplier with the Secured Promissory Note is reimbursed in full.full, therefore, the note is classified as long-term.

On July 18, 2016, the Company and the supplier entered into that certain Secured Promissory Note, with an effective date of July 1, 2016, in the principal amount of $12,492,137. The USD Note accrues interest at 12% per annum and is payable in six consecutive monthly installments of principal and accrued interest in a minimum principal amount of $250,000 each, with any remaining principal and accrued interest due and payable on December 31, 2016.

NOTE 10 – SUBORDINATED NOTES8 –NOTES PAYABLE, RELATED PARTIES

Notes and loans payable, related parties consisted of the following:

For the three months ended March 31, 20182019 and 2017,2018, the Company recorded interest expense in connection with these notes in the amount of $20,232$51,495 and $160,790,$20,232, respectively.

The note payable for acquisition of Quest was issued on January 9, 2014 in conjunction with the acquisition of Quest Marketing, Inc. The initial interest rate was 1.89%, subsequent to December 31, 2015; the interest was increased to 6% and is due in 2018. Principal and interest payments have been postponed. In addition, on June 17, 2016, the Company entered into Promissory Note Conversion Agreement with one of the Noteholders whereby $684,000 of the promissory note was converted into 684,000 shares of Series C Preferred Stock. As part of the transaction, the related debt discount of $171,000 was recorded against Additional paid in capital. As part of the acquisition of Quest Marketing, the Company engaged an independent valuation analysis to do a valuation of the purchase accounting. In July 2016, the holders of the notes signed subordination agreements with the Supplier of the Secured Promissory Note and Action, whereby the noteholders agree to subordinate their rights and payments until the Supplier with the Secured Promissory Note is reimbursed in full. As a result, the balance on this loan and related accrued interest at December 31, 2016 were all classified as long term.

The note payable for acquisition of BCS was issued on November 21, 2014 in conjunction with the acquisition of BCS. The current interest is at 1.89% and is due in 2018. This note is convertible into Common Stock at $2.00 per share, subject to board approval such that no debt holder can own more than 5% of the outstanding shares. Principal payments $ and interest payments have been postponed. In July 2016, the holders of the notes signed subordination agreements with the Supplier of the Secured Promissory Note and Action, whereby the noteholder agree to subordinate its right and payment of capital and interest until the Supplier with the Secured Promissory Note is reimbursed in full. As a result, the balance on this loan and related accrued interest at December 31, 2016 were all classified as long term.

The Quest preferred stock 6% note payable is in conjunction with the promissory note issued in October 2015 related to the redemption and cancelation of 100% of the issued and outstanding Series A preferred stock as well as 3,400,000 stock options that had been issued to a now former employee. The principal payments have been postponed. In June 2016, the holder of the note granted the Company a forgiveness of debt in the amount of $75,000 which was recorded as an increase in the additional paid in capital because it was a related party transaction. In addition, on June 17, 2016, the Company entered into a Promissory Note Conversion Agreement with the Noteholder whereby $1,800,000 of the promissory note was converted into 1,800,000 shares of Series C Preferred Stock. In July 2016, the holders of the notes signed subordination agreements with the Supplier of the Secured Promissory Note and Action, whereby the noteholder agree to subordinate its right and payment of capital and interest until the Supplier with the Secured Promissory Note is reimbursed in full. As a result, the balance on this loan and related accrued interest at December 31, 2016 were all classified as long term.

On February 26, 2018, the Company entered into a lease termination agreement with David and Kathy Marin whereby it cancelled the lease for the premises located at 12272 Monarch St., Garden Grove, California effective as of April 20, 2018.

On February 28, 2018, the Company finalized two settlement agreements with David and Kathy Marin (the “Marin Settlement Agreements”) which have an effective date of December 30, 2017. Pursuant to the first Marin Settlement Agreement (the “Marin Settlement Agreement I”), the Company and the Marins agreed to reduce the Company’s purchase price for all of the capital stock of Bar Code Specialties, Inc., which was acquired by the Company from the Marins in November 2014. In the 2014 acquisition, the Company had issued David Marin a promissory note for $11,000,000 of which an aggregate of $10,696,465.17$10,696,465 (the “Owed Amount”) was outstanding as of February 26, 2018 which includes accrued interest earned but not paid. Pursuant to the Marin Settlement Agreement I, the amount of the indebtedness owed to Marin was reduced by $9,495,465.17$9,495,465 bringing the total amount owed to $1,201,000. Section 3.1 of the original note was amended to provide that the Company shall pay the Marins 60 monthly payments of $20,000 each commencing the earlier of (i) October 26, 2018 and (ii) the date that the Company’s obligation to Scansource, Inc., currently in the amount of $2,800,000 is satisfied and all amounts currently in default under the credit agreement with Scansource (currently approximately $ 6.0 Million) is reduced to $2.0 million. The Marins agreed to release their security interest against the Company. In connection with the $9,495,465.17$9,495,465 reduction in the purchase price, the Company issued the Marins 3 year warrants to purchase an aggregate of 3,000,000 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $0.20 per share.

On February 28, 2018, the Company finalized an additional settlement agreement with the Marins (the “Marin Settlement Agreement II”) whereby the Company settled a promissory note owed to the Marins in the original principal amount of $100,000 which currently had a balance of $111,064.69$111,065 in its entirety in exchange for an aggregate of 85,000 shares of the Company’s Series C Preferred Stock. The Series C Preferred Stock has a liquidation value and conversion price of $1.00 per share and automatically converts into Common Stock at $1.00 per share in the event that the Company’s common stock has a closing price of $1.50 per share for 20 consecutive trading days. The preferred stock pays a 6% dividend commencing two years from issuance. During the first two years, the Series C Preferred stock shall neither pay or accrue the dividend. The Company also agreed to transfer title to a vehicle that was being utilized by Mr. Marin to David Marin. In exchange therefor, the $100,000 Note and the accrued interest thereon was cancelled in its entirety. The effective date of the agreement is December 30, 2017.

On February 22,28, 2018, the Company finalized a settlement agreement with Kurt Thomet whereby the Company settled its indebtedness to Mr. Thomet in the current amount of $5,437,136.40$5,437,136 in full in exchange for 60 monthly payments of $12,500 each commencing the earlier of (i) October 26, 2018 or (ii) the date when the Company’s obligation under its promissory note with Scansource, Inc. currently in the amount of $21,800,000 is satisfied and all amounts currently due under the credit agreement with Scansource (currently approximately $6.0 million) is reduced to $2.0 million. In addition, the Company issued Mr. Thomet an aggregate of 500,000 shares of restricted common stock and 1,000,000 shares of Series C Preferred Stock with the same rights and restrictions as described above in the description of the Marin Settlement II Agreement. The effective date of the agreement is December 30, 2017.

On February 19,28, 2018, the Company finalized a settlement agreement with George Zicman whereby the Company settled its indebtedness to Mr. Zicman in the current amount of $1,304,198.55$1,304,199 in full in exchange for 60 monthly payments of $3,000 each commencing the earlier of (i) October 26, 2018 or (ii) the date when the Company’s obligation under its promissory note with Scansource, Inc. currently in the amount of $2,800,000 is satisfied and all amounts currently due under the credit agreement with Scansource (currently approximately $6.0 million) is reduced to $2.0 million. In addition, the Company issued Mr. Zicman an aggregate of 100,000 shares of common stock and 600,000 shares of Series C Preferred Stock with the same rights and restrictions as described above in the description of the Marin Settlement Agreement II. The effective date of the agreement is December 30, 2017.

Each of the Marins, Thomet and Zicman entered into a voting agreement with the Company whereby they agreed to vote any shares of common stock beneficially owned by them as directed by the Company’s CEO and also agreed to a leakout restriction whereby they each agreed not to sell more than 10% of the common stock beneficially owned during any 30-day period.

On June 7, 2018, the Company authorized the issuance of 8,600,000 shares of common stock to Jason Griffith. The issuance was part of a convertible provision in an existing note held by Jason Griffith. With the issuance of stock, the debt of $1,199,400 and all accrued interest was extinguished.

On October 5, 2018, the Company entered into a purchase agreement with Walefar Investments, Ltd. (“Walefar”) and Campbeltown Consulting, Inc. (“Campbeltown”) (Walefar and Campbeltown are collectively referred to as the “Sellers”). Pursuant to the agreement, the Company purchased 100% of the capital stock of HTS Image Processing, Inc. (“HTS”) from the Sellers. As consideration, the Company (i) issued to the Sellers 22,452,954 shares of the Company’s common stock, having a value of $5,298,897 based on the average closing price of the common stock for the 20 days’ preceding the agreement (the “Per Share Value”), (ii) cash in the amount of $300,000, and (iii) a 12 month convertible promissory note with a principal amount of $700,000 and an interest rate of six percent (6%) per year. The note also provides the Sellers the right to convert all or any portion of the then outstanding and unpaid principal amount and interest into fully paid and non-assessable shares of the Company’s common stock at a conversion price of $0.236. The agreement constitutes a “related party transaction” because of Company director Shai Lustgarten’s position as Chief Executive Officer of HTS and stock ownership in HTS. Additionally, Campbeltown is a “related party” because Carlos Jaime Nissenson, the beneficial owner of Campbeltown, is a consultant to the Company, a principal stockholder of the Company, and father of Company director Neev Nissenson. Carlos Jaime Nissenson was also a stockholder and director of HTS. Pursuant to the agreement, Shai Lustgarten received 11,226,477 shares of the Company’s common stock and Carlos Jaime Nissenson received 11,226,477 shares of the Company’s common stock.

On May 29, 2019, the Company, Campbeltown and Walefar entered into an Amendment to the HTS Purchase Agreement (the “Amendment”), which provided for an adjustment to the number of shares of common stock issued to Walefar and Campbeltown in the acquisition of HTS. Pursuant to the Amendment, Campbeltown and Walefar agreed to return for cancelation 5,542,328 and 5,542,329 shares of common stock, respectively. This Amendment reduced the amount of shares issued in the acquisition to 11,368,297 shares from 22,452,954 shares and the amount of share consideration to approximately $2,682,918 from approximately $5,298,897. This adjustment was made as a result of a correction in the calculation of working capital and other share give back provisions of the HTS Purchase Agreement.

On April 4, 2019, the Company entered into a form of Securities Purchase Agreement (the “Securities Purchase Agreement”) with accredited investors (the “Purchasers”). Pursuant to the Securities Purchase Agreement, on April 9, 2019 (the “Closing Date”), the Company sold an aggregate, with the Conversions included, of $5,000,000 of units (the “Units”) resulting in gross proceeds of $5,000,000, before deducting placement agent fees and offering expenses (the “Offering”). The per Unit purchase price was $0.30. Each Unit is comprised of one share of the Company’s common stock, $0.001 par value per share (the “Common Stock”), and a warrant to purchase one share of Common Stock, and, as a result of the Offering, the Company issued 16,666,667 shares of Common Stock (the “Shares”) and warrants (the “Warrants”) to purchase 16,666,667 shares of Common Stock (the “Warrant Shares”) at an exercise price equal to $0.35 per Warrant Share, which Warrants are exercisable for a period of five and one-half years from the issuance date. Both Shai Lustgarten, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, and Carlos J. Nissensohn, a consultant to and principal stockholder of the Company, participated in the Offering by converting $200,000 each of unpaid principal owed to them from the HTS acquisition (the “Conversions”) by the Company in exchange for Shares and Warrants on the same terms as all other Purchasers. With the Conversions included, the Offering resulted in gross proceeds of $5,000,000. As a result of the Conversions, a principal amount of $150,000 is owed to each Walefar and Campbeltown respectively under the note issued to them as partial consideration in the sale of HTS to the Company on October 5, 2018.

The repayment of the subordinated notes payable, related parties at March 31, 20182019 is as follows:

NOTE 119 – STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICITEQUITY

PREFERRED STOCK

Series A

As of March 31, 2018,2019, there were 1,000,000 Series A preferred shares designated and 0 Series A preferred shares outstanding. The board of directors of the Company (the “Board”) had previously set the voting rights for the preferred stock at 1 share of preferred to 250 common shares.

Series B

As of March 31, 20182019, there was 1 preferred share designated and 0 preferred shares outstanding. Effective on September 30, 2016, with the divestiture of Quest Solution Canada Inc., the one share was redeemed by the Company and retired.

Series C

As of March 31, 2018,2019, there were 15,000,000 Series C preferred share authorized and 4,828,530 Series C preferred share outstanding. It has preferential rights above common shares and the Series B preferred shares and is entitled to receive a quarterly dividend at a rate of $0.06 per share per annum. As part of a debt settlement agreement effective December 30, 2017, 1,685,000 shares were issued with the quarterly dividend at a rate of $.06$0.06 per share per annum were waived for a period of 24 months, with no dividends being accrued or paid. Each Series C preferred share outstanding is convertible into one (1) share of common stock of Quest Solution, Inc.

COMMON STOCK

In April 2017,

On January 10, 2019, the Company issued 640,000 shares to the Chief Executive Officer as a signing bonus under his Employment Agreement. In addition, the Company issued 70,000 shares to the Chief Financial Officer as additional fees pursuant to his Contractor Agreement.

On June 30, 2017, the Company issued 87,500 shares to board members in relation to the vesting schedule agreed to during 4^thquarter 2015, which is based on an annual grantaggregate of 100,000 restricted shares every October and vesting over 8 quarters per independent board member as compensation.

On August 2, 2017, the Company authorized the issuance of 600,000623 shares of common stock to four individuals as part of a consulting agreement with Carlos Jaime Nissensohn. The shares were issued in November, 2017the Company’s Employee Stock Purchase Program for proceeds of $324.

On December 30, 2017,February 19, 2019, the Company authorized the issuanceissued an aggregate of 600,000457 shares of common stock valued at $59,400,to certain individuals as part of a debt extinguishment agreement with two related parties. The common shares were issued on March 9, 2018.

On March 08, 2018 and pursuant to the Plan, the Company granted a grand total of 1,700,000 Shares, as well as options to purchase up to 7,000,000 Shares (the “Options”) with an exercise price equal to the closing price of the Company’s common stock on Wednesday, March 07, 2018, $0.12 per share. A totalEmployee Stock Purchase Program for proceeds of 1,000,000 Shares and 3,200,000 Options were issued to the Company’s Board of Directors as follows:

On March 08, 2018 and pursuant to the Plan, the Company granted 500,000 Shares to its Chief Financial Officer Benjamin Kemper.

On March 08, 2018, the Company issued 500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.001, to Mr. Carlos J Nissensohn, who is the father of Niv Nissensohn, a director of the Company, pursuant to a consulting agreement (the “Consulting Agreement”) dated August 02, 2017 which was previously filed with the SEC on the Company’s Form 8-K dated August, 04, 2017.$233.

On March 08,2018,31, 2019, the Company issued 200,000an aggregate of 707 shares of common stock to certain individuals as part of the Company’s common stock to the JSM SOC-DIG LP.

Employee Stock Purchase Program for proceeds of $252.

As of March 31, 2018,2019, the Company had 39,673,63171,426,401 common shares outstanding.

Warrants and Stock Options

On March 08,8, 2018, the Company adopted an Equity Incentivethe Plan (the “Plan”), as an incentive, to retain in the employ of and as directors, officers, consultants, advisors and employees to the Company. TenOn October 31, 2018, the Board amended the Plan to increase the amount of shares authorized for issuance thereunder from ten million (10,000,000) to sixteen million (16,000,000) shares of the Corporation’s common stock, par value $0.001 (the “Shares”), was set aside. On January 23, 2019, the Company’s shareholders adopted and reserved for issuance pursuant toratified the Plan.

Warrants- The following table summarizes information about warrants granted during the three month periods ended March 31, 20182019 and 2017:2018:

Outstanding warrants as of March 31, 20182019 are as follows:

Warrants outstanding at March 31, 20182019 and 20172018 have the following expiry date and exercise prices:

Share Purchase2014 Stock Option Plan

The Company hasOn November 17, 2014, the Board adopted a stock option plan adopted in on November 17, 2014 and an equity incentive plan adopted March 8, 2018(the “2014 Plan”) whereby the Board of Directors, may grant to directors, officers, employees, or consultants of the Company shares of common stock as well as options to acquire common shares. The Board of Directors of the Company has the authority to determine the terms, limits, restrictions and conditions of the grant of options, to interpret the plan and make all decisions relating thereto. The plan2014 Plan was adopted by the Company’s Board of Directors in order to provide an inducement and serve as a long term incentive program. The maximum number of common shares that may be reserved for issuance under the Plan was set at 20,000,000.ten million (10,000,000).

The option exercise price is established by the Board of Directors and may not be lower than the market price of the common shares at the time of grant. The options may be exercised during the option period determined by the Board, of Directors, which may vary, but will not exceed ten years from the date of the grant. There are 20,000,00010,000,000 of the Company’s common shares which may be issued pursuant to the exercise of share options granted under the 2014 Plan. As at March 31, 2018,2019, the Company had issued options, allowing for the subscription of 16,353,000 common20,121,000 shares of its share capital.common stock.

Stock Options - The following table summarizes information about stock options granted during the three months ended March 31, 20172019 and 2016:2018:

For the three months ended March 31, 2018,2019, the Company granted a total of 6,800,0000 stock options, 1,200,000 stock options were granted to three Board members and 2,000,000 stock options were granted to the Chief Executive Officer, 200,000 to Company’s legal counsel.options.

Outstanding stock options as of March 31, 20182019 are as follows: