Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ~~[X]~~ ☒ No ~~[ ]~~☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ~~[X]~~ ☒ No ~~[ ]~~☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ~~[ ]~~☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ~~[ ]~~ ☐ No ~~[X]~~ ☒

At ~~May 19,~~November 9, 2021, there were ~~5,444,622,595~~9,050,267,683 shares of common stock issued and outstanding.

In addition to historical information, this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q includes forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are those that predict or describe future events or trends and that do not relate solely to historical matters. You can generally identify forward-looking statements as statements containing the words “believe,” “expect,” “will,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “estimate,” “project,” “plan,” “assume” or other similar expressions, or negatives of those expressions, although not all forward-looking statements contain these identifying words. All statements contained or incorporated by reference in this quarterly report regarding our future strategy, future operations, projected financial position, estimated future revenues, projected costs, future prospects, the future of our industry and results that might be obtained by pursuing management’s current plans and objectives are forward-looking statements.

You should not place undue reliance on our forward-looking statements because the matters they describe are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other unpredictable factors, many of which are beyond our control. These factors, risks and uncertainties can be found in Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, ~~2020,~~2021, as the same may be updated from time to time, including in Part II, Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Although we believe the expectations reflected in our forward-looking statements are based upon reasonable assumptions, it is not possible to foresee or identify all factors that could have a material effect on the future financial performance of the Company. The forward-looking statements in this report are made on the basis of management’s assumptions and analyses, as of the time the statements are made, in light of their experience and perception of historical conditions, expected future developments and other factors believed to be appropriate under the circumstances. Except as otherwise required by the federal securities laws, we disclaim any obligation or undertaking to publicly release any updates or revisions to any forward-looking statement contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and the information incorporated by reference in this report to reflect any change in our expectations with regard thereto or any change in events, conditions or circumstances on which any statement is based.

Sugarmade, Inc. and ~~Subsidiary~~
Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

							September 30, 2021			June 30, 2021
	For the Period Ended						For the Period Ended
	March 31, 2021			June 30, 2020			September 30, 2021			June 30, 2021
	(Unaudited)						(Unaudited)			(Audited)
Assets
Current assets:
Cash	$	269,885		$	441,004		$	239,500		$	1,396,944
Accounts receivable, net		75,040			134,517			656,809			435,598
Inventory, net		692,460			679,471			609,457			441,582
Loan receivables, current		-			1,365
Loan receivables - related party, current		208,931			122,535
Trading securities, at market value								809,804			1,451,922
Other current assets		1,066,597			263,404			218,417			182,457
Right of use asset, current		237,556			270,363			249,464			243,406
Total current assets		2,550,469			1,912,659			2,783,452			4,151,909
Noncurrent assets:
Equipment, net		390,189			499,047
Property, plant and equipment, net								3,537,202			2,749,340
Intangible asset, net		14,578			9,800			10,648,861			10,650,394
Other assets		-			54,163
Loan receivable - Investment, noncurrent		196,000			196,000
Goodwill								757,648			757,648
Loan receivables, noncurrent								196,000			196,000
Right of use asset, noncurrent		549,261			835,393			421,557			486,253
Investment to Indigo Dye		564,819			-
Equity method investments in affiliates								396,930			441,407
Total noncurrent assets		1,714,847			1,594,403			15,958,198			15,281,042
Total assets	$	4,265,316		$	3,507,062		$	18,741,650		$	19,432,951

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Deficiency
Liabilities and stockholders’ equity
Current liabilities:
Note payable due to bank	$	25,982		$	25,982		$	25,982		$	25,982
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		1,753,855			1,583,228			2,185,429			2,058,839
Customer deposits		660,268			466,337			861,906			751,919
Customer overpayment		53,183			47,890			61,964			59,953
Unearned revenue		9,379			53,248			20,265			0
Other payables		812,069			691,801			697,813			750,485
Accrued interest		515,767			494,740			571,570			509,997
Accrued compensation and personnel related payables		-			35,361			-			15,471
Notes payable - Current		20,000			20,000			32,041			33,047
Notes payable - Related Parties, Current		15,427			15,427			-			15,427
Lease liability - Current		231,305			372,285			246,682			239,521
Loans payable - Current		350,221			319,314			926,800			392,605
Loan payable - Related Parties, Current		238,150			35,943			46,871			163,831
Convertible notes payable, Net, Current		1,982,902			1,740,122			1,182,601			1,421,694
Derivative liabilities, net		2,723,899			5,597,095			1,315,913			2,217,361
Warrants liabilities		24,216			79,910			12,753			21,042
Shares to be issued		136,577			101,577			239,577			138,077
Total current liabilities		9,553,200			11,680,260			8,428,166			8,815,251
Non-Current liabilities:
Loans payable		366,495			197,946
Non-current liabilities:
Loans payable, noncurrent								557,362			308,588
Note payable, noncurrent								4,928,894			4,997,323
Convertible notes payable, net, noncurrent								41,494			17,422
Lease liability		591,116			767,729			456,755			524,149
Total non-current liabilities								5,984,505			5,847,482
Total liabilities		10,510,811			12,645,935			14,412,671			14,662,733

Stockholders’ deficiency:
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized 1,541,500 and 3,541,500 shares issued outstanding at March 31, 2021 and June 30, 2020		1,542			3,542
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 10,000,000,000 shares authorized, 4,718,104,197 and 1,763,277,230 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2021 and June 30, 2020, respectively		4,718,105			1,763,278
Stockholders’ equity:
Series A Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 7,000,000 shares authorized, 0 and 0 shares issued outstanding at September 30, 2021 and June 30, 2021								-			-
Series B Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 2,999,999 shares authorized, 2,541,500 and 541,500 shares issued outstanding at September 30, 2021 and June 30, 2021								2,542			542
Series C Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 1 share authorized, 1 and 1 shares issued outstanding at September 30, 2021 and June 30, 2021								-			-
Preferred stock value
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 10,000,000,000 shares authorized, 8,438,707,554 and 7,402,535,677 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2021 and June 30, 2021, respectively								8,438,707			7,402,536
Additional paid-in capital		63,095,927			57,307,767			72,214,564			64,841,654
Share to be issued, Preferred stock		(1	)		-
Common Stock Subscribed		236,008			236,008
Share to be issued, preferred stock								-			5,600,000
Subscription receivable								-			(500,000	)
Share to be issued, preferred stock								40,008			1,889,608
Accumulated deficit		(74,350,923	)		(68,438,332	)		(75,959,833	)		(74,364,466	)
Total stockholders’ deficiency		(6,299,342	)		(9,127,737	)
Total stockholders’ equity								4,735,987			4,869,874
Non-Controlling Interest		53,847			(11,136	)		(407,007	)		(99,656	)
Total stockholders’ deficiency		(6,245,495	)		(9,138,873	)
Total liabilities and stockholders’ deficiency	$	4,265,316		$	3,507,062
Total stockholders’ equity								4,328,979			4,770,218
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity							$	18,741,650		$	19,432,951

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

Sugarmade, Inc. and ~~Subsidiary~~
Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Operations

* Shares issuable upon conversion of convertible debts and exercising of warrants were excluded in calculating diluted loss per share.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

~~The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.~~

Sugarmade, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as ~~“we,”~~“we”, “us” or ~~“Company”~~“the/our Company”) ~~is a publicly-traded company~~was originally incorporated on June 5, 1986 in California as Lab, Inc., and later that month, on June 24, 1986 changed its name to Software Professionals, Inc. On May 21, 1996, the Company changed its name to Enlighten Software Solutions, Inc. On June 20, 2007, Enlighten Software Solutions, Inc. was incorporated in Delaware for the ~~state~~purpose of merging with Enlighten Softwear Solutions, Inc. a California Corporation so as to affect a redomicile to Delaware. ~~Our previous legal~~On January 24, 2008, the Company changed its name ~~was~~to Diversified Opportunities, Inc. ~~Our Company operates~~On May 9, 2011 we closed on a Share Exchange Agreement with Sugarmade, Inc., a California corporation and on June 24, 2011 changed our ~~business activities through multiple subsidiaries, which includes~~name to Sugarmade, Inc.

On October 24, 2014 we acquired SWC Group, Inc., a California corporation doing business as, CarryOutSupplies.com (“~~SWC”~~Carry Out Supplies”)~~, SugarRush,~~. Today, our Company, Sugarmade, Inc. operates much of its business activities through our subsidiaries, SWC Group, Inc., a California corporation ~~and~~(“SWC’’), NUG Avenue, Inc., a California ~~corporation.~~

corporation (“NUG Avenue”), and Lemon Glow Company, Inc., a California corporation (“Lemon Glow”). Sugarmade, Inc. was founded in 2010. ~~In 2014, CarryOutSupplies.com~~

Shares of our common stock are quoted on the OTC Pink Open Market tier of OTC Markets, which is a quotation system for early-stage and developing companies. Our trading symbol is “SGMD”. Our corporate website is www.sugarmade.com.

As of the date of this filing, we are involved in several business sectors and business ventures:

Paper and paper-based products: The supply of consumable products to the quick-service restaurant sub-sector of the restaurant industry, and as an importer and distributor of non-medical personal protection equipment to business and consumers, via our Carry Out Supplies subsidiary. Carry Out Supplies is a producer and wholesaler of custom printed and generic supplies, servicing more than 2,000 quick-service restaurants. The primary products are plastic cold cups, paper coffee cups, yogurt cups, ice cream cups, cup lids, cup sleeves, edible packaging, food containers, soup containers, plastic spoons, and similar products for this market sector. This subsidiary, which was ~~acquired by Sugarmade,~~formed in 2009, was recently expanded to also offer non-medical personal protective equipment.

~~Sugar Rush, Inc., our wholly owned subsidiary, seeks to enter the business of operating and investing~~ investment into licensed cannabis delivery in ~~specialized licensed and regulated hemp and cannabis operations.~~

~~The Company is also~~Los Angeles area markets. On February 8, 2021, we became a majority owner ~~in Nug~~of NUG Avenue, Inc., a California corporation (“NUG Avenue”), which ~~is engaged in the licensed and regulated market for the delivery of cannabis and a part owner in Indigo Dye Group, the operator of~~operates a licensed and regulated cannabis delivery service out of Lynwood, California, serving the greater Los Angeles Metropolitan area (the “Lynwood Operations”). The Company currently owns a majority stake of seventy percent (70%) of NUG Avenue’s Lynwood Operations and holds first rights of refusal on NUG Avenue’s business expansion relative to the cannabis marketplace. By way of our capital injection made into NUG Avenue and via our 70% ownership position, we consolidate and recognize 100% of the revenues and 70% of profits or loss generated by NUG Ave for its Lynwood Operations.

We believe our investment into NUG Avenue will allow us to expand our presence into the licensed and regulated cannabis marketplace. The California cannabis market continues its rapid growth, with the Southern California sub-market representing the world’s largest single cannabis marketplace. According to the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration, the most recently reported quarterly period posted a significant increase in ~~Northern~~cannabis tax compared to the year-ago period. Much of this growth was driven by increased use of delivery services, as consumers are increasingly relying on home delivery for many goods, including cannabis.

Cannabis products delivery service and sales: As a joint owner in the Budcars licensed cannabis delivery service brand (“Budcars” or the “Budcars Brand”). Budcars operates a licensed cannabis delivery service in the Sacramento, California area. In February 2020, the Company entered into an agreement with Indigo Dye Group Corp. (“Indigo”) to acquire a 40% stake in the Budcars Brand and in the Sacramento delivery operations. Under the terms of the agreement with Indigo, Sugarmade acquired an option to purchase an additional 30% interest in Budcars. Upon exercise of this option, the Company would acquire a controlling interest in Indigo. As of September 30, 2021, the option has not yet been exercised and the Company’s stake in Budcars remained at 40%. The Company plans to open new locations via purchasing equity in other franchise brands to cover delivery for the entire state of California. Therefore, the Company is not likely at this time to exercise its option to acquire the additional 30% interest in Indigo. In addition, the Company is no longer involved in day-to-day operations of Indigo and going forward, the Company intends to pursue cannabis delivery independent of Indigo. As of October 1, 2020, the Company ceased to have control over the day-to-day business of Indigo and it was deconsolidated and recorded as an investment in nonconsolidated affiliate at its $505,449 estimated fair value and changed to equity method of accounting. Pursuant to the terms of the Indigo agreement, if the Company determines, in its discretion not to continue to make monthly payments, its 40% ownership interest in Indigo will be decreased according to the payment then made. As of December 31, 2020, the Company made $59,370 additional payments, and held approximately 32% of the ownership of Indigo. As of September 30, 2021, the Company recorded equity method investment in affiliates at $396,930, net with $44,477 loss from equity method investment.

~~These operations~~Selected cannabis and ~~investments are outlined~~hemp projects: On May 12, 2021, Sugarmade entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger, as amended (the “Merger Agreement”) by and between Lemon Glow Corporation, a California corporation (“Lemon Glow”), Carnaby Spot Bay Corp, a California corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company (“Merger Sub”), and Ryan Santiago (the “Shareholder Representative”), pursuant to which, on May 25, 2021 and upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in ~~more detail below.~~the Merger Agreement, Merger Sub merged with and into Lemon Glow, with Lemon Glow being the surviving corporation (the “Merger”). As a result of the Merger, Lemon Glow became a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. On October 28, 2021, the Company obtained a conditional Use Permit (UP) number from the Community Development Department of the County of Lake, California, which the Company believes is an important step towards the conditional Use Permit (UP) for commercial cannabis cultivation at its Property.

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) and the rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all the information and footnotes necessary for a comprehensive presentation of financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. It is management’s opinion however, that all material adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) have been made which are necessary for a fair financial statement presentation.

These interim condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with our Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, ~~2020,~~2021, which contains our audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto, together with the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation, for the fiscal year ended June 30, ~~2020.~~2021. The interim results for the period ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2021 are not necessarily indicative of the results for the full fiscal year.

The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of our Company, its wholly-owned subsidiaries, SWC Group, Inc., a California corporation (“SWC’’), Lemon Glow Company, Inc., a California corporation (“Lemon Glow”), and ~~SWC, the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary.~~its majority owned subsidiary, NUG Avenue, Inc., a California corporation (“Nug Avenue”), as well as Indigo Dye Group Corp., a variable interest entity (“VIE”). All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.

The Company’s continuation as a going concern is dependent on its ability to generate sufficient cash flows from operations to meet its obligations, in which it has not been successful, and/or obtaining additional financing from its shareholders or other sources, as may be required.

Our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that we will continue as a going concern. Such assumption contemplates the realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and classifications of liabilities that may result should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

Management endeavors to increase revenue-generating operations. While the Company’s priority is on generating cash from operations, management also seek to raise additional working capital through various financing sources, including the sale of the Company’s equity and/or debt securities, which may not be available on commercially reasonable terms to our Company, or which may not be available at all. If such financing is not available on satisfactory terms, we may be unable to continue our business as desired and our operating results will be adversely affected. In addition, any financing arrangement may have potentially adverse effects on us and/or our stockholders. Debt financing (if available and undertaken) will increase expenses, must be repaid regardless of operating results and may involve restrictions limiting our operating flexibility. If we issue equity securities to raise additional funds, the percentage ownership of our existing stockholders will be reduced, and the new equity securities may have rights, preferences or privileges senior to those of the current holders of our common stock.

The Company applies the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (the “FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 805, Business Combinations, in accounting for its acquisitions. It requires the Company to recognize separately from goodwill the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed, at the acquisition date fair values. Goodwill as of the acquisition date is measured as the excess of consideration transferred over the acquisition date fair values of the net assets acquired and the liabilities assumed. The Company used third party valuation company to determine the assets acquired and liabilities assumed with the corresponding offset to goodwill.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires our management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates.

We recognize revenue in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC’’) No. 606, Revenue Recognition. Sugarmade applied a five-step approach in determining the amount and timing of revenue to be recognized: (1) identifying the contract with a customer, (2) identifying the performance obligations in the contract, (3) determining the transaction price, (4) allocating the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract and (5) recognizing revenue when the performance obligation is satisfied.

Substantially all of the Company’s revenue is recognized at the time control of the products transfers to the customer.

Property and equipment is stated at the historical cost, less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation on property and equipment is provided using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets for both financial and income tax reporting purposes as follows:

Expenditures for renewals and betterments are capitalized while repairs and maintenance costs are normally charged to the statement of operations in the year in which they are incurred. In situations where it can be clearly demonstrated that the expenditure has resulted in an increase in the future economic benefits expected to be obtained from the use of the asset, the expenditure is capitalized as an additional cost of the asset.

Upon sale or disposal of an asset, the historical cost and related accumulated depreciation or amortization of such asset were removed from their respective accounts and any gain or loss is recorded in the statements of income.

The Company reviews the carrying value of property, plant, and equipment for impairment whenever events and circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable from the estimated future cash flows expected to result from its use and eventual disposition. In cases where undiscounted expected future cash flows are less than the carrying value, an impairment loss is recognized equal to an amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair value of assets. The factors considered by management in performing this assessment include current operating results, trends and prospects, the manner in which the property is used, and the effects of obsolescence, demand, competition and other economic factors. Based on this assessment, no0 impairment expenses for property, plant, and equipment was recorded in operating expenses during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2021 and 2020.

Long-lived assets, which include property, plant and equipment and intangible assets, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.

Recoverability of long-lived assets to be held and used is measured by comparing the carrying amount of an asset to the estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated undiscounted future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized by the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the assets. Fair value is generally determined using the asset’s expected future discounted cash flows or market value, if readily determinable. Based on its review, ~~the Company,~~there was $0 and $43,800 impairment loss of its long-lived assets as of September 30, 2021 and June 30, 2020, performed an impairment test of all of its intangible assets. Based on the Company’s analysis, the company had an amortization of intangible assets of $4,778 and 1,050 for the nine months ended March 31, 2021, ~~and 2020,~~ respectively.

In February 2016, the FASB established Topic 842, Leases, by issuing Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2016-02, which requires lessees to recognize the rights and obligations created by leases on the balance sheet and disclose key information about leasing arrangements. Topic 842 was subsequently amended by ASU No. 2018-11, Targeted Improvements, ASU No. 2018-10, Codification Improvements to Topic 842, and ASU No. 2018-01, Land Easement Practical Expedient for Transition to Topic 842. The new standard establishes a right-of-use model ~~(“ROU”)~~(ROU) that requires a lessee to recognize a ROU asset and lease liability on the balance sheet for all leases with a term longer than 12 months. Leases will be classified as finance or operating, with classification affecting the pattern and classification of expense recognition in the statement of operations.

The new standard became effective April 1, 2019. A modified retrospective transition approach is required, applying the new standard to all leases existing at the date of initial application. An entity may choose to use either (1) its effective date or (2) the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements as its date of initial application. If an entity chooses the second option, the transition requirements for existing leases also apply to leases entered into between the date of initial application and the effective date. The entity must also recast its comparative period financial statements and provide the disclosures required by the new standard for the comparative periods. The Company adopted the new standard on July 1, 2019 using the modified retrospective transition approach as of the effective date of the initial application. The new standard provides a number of optional practical expedients in transition. The Company elected the “package of practical expedients”, which permits entities not to reassess under the new lease standard prior conclusions about lease identification, lease classification and initial direct costs. The Company does not expect to elect the use-of-hindsight or the practical expedient pertaining to land easements.

The most significant effects of the adoption of the new standard relate to the recognition of new ROU assets and lease labilities on our balance sheet for office operating leases and providing significant new disclosures about our leasing activities.

The new standard also provides practical expedients for an entity’s ongoing accounting. The Company has also elected the short-term leases recognition exemption for all leases that qualify. This means that the Company will not recognize ROU assets or lease liabilities, and this includes not recognizing ROU assets and lease liabilities, for existing short-term leases of those assets in transition. The Company also currently expects to elect the practical expedient to not separate lease and non-lease components for its leases. All existing leases are reported under this rule.

Under ASC 840, leases were classified as either capital or operating, and the classification significantly impacted the effect the contract had on the company’s financial statements. Capital lease classification resulted in a liability that was recorded on a company’s balance sheet, whereas operating leases did not impact the balance sheet. After the new adoption, $1,105,755 of operating lease right-of-use asset and $1,140,041 of operating lease liabilities were reflected on the Company’s June 30, 2020 financial statements and $786,817 of operating lease right-of-use asset and $822,421 of operating lease liabilities were reflected on the Company’s March 31, 2021 financial statements.

Goodwill is the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of identifiable net assets acquired in business combinations accounted for under the acquisition method. Intangible assets represent purchased intangible assets including developed technology and in-process research and development, technologies acquired or licensed from other companies, customer relationships, non-compete covenants, backlog, and trademarks and tradenames. Purchased finite-lived intangible assets are capitalized and amortized over their estimated useful lives. Technologies acquired or licensed from other companies, customer relationships, non-compete covenants, backlog, and trademarks and tradenames are capitalized and amortized over the lesser of the terms of the agreement, or estimated useful life. We capitalize cannabis cultivation license acquired as part of a business combination.

Stock based compensation cost to employees is measured at the date of grant, based on the calculated fair value of the stock-based award, and will be recognized as expense over the employee’s requisite service period (generally the vesting period of the award). We estimate the fair value of employee stock options granted using the Binomial Option Pricing Model. Key assumptions used to estimate the fair value of stock options will include the exercise price of the award, the fair value of our common stock on the date of grant, the expected option term, the risk-free interest rate at the date of grant, the expected volatility and the expected annual dividend yield on our common stock. We use our company’s own data among other information to estimate the expected price volatility and the expected forfeiture rate. Share-based compensation awards issued to non-employees for services rendered are recorded at either the fair value of the services rendered or the fair value of the share-based payment, whichever is more readily determinable.

We calculate basic earnings (loss) per share (“EPS”) by dividing our net income (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period, without considering common stock equivalents. Diluted EPS is computed by dividing net income or net loss by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period and the weighted average number of dilutive common stock equivalents, such as options and warrants. Options and warrants are only included in the calculation of diluted EPS when their effect is dilutive.

ASC Topic 820 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, establishes a three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosure of fair value measurement and enhances disclosure requirements for fair value measurements. The valuation hierarchy is based upon the transparency of inputs to the valuation of an asset or liability as of the measurement date. The three levels are defined as follows:

Level 1 - observable inputs that reflect quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.

Level 2 - include other inputs that are directly or indirectly observable in the marketplace.

Level 3 - unobservable inputs which are supported by little or no market activity.

The Company used Level 3 inputs for its valuation methodology for the derivative liabilities in determining the fair value using the Binomial option-pricing model for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2021.

The fair value of derivative instruments is recorded and shown separately under current liabilities. Changes in the fair value of derivatives liability are recorded in the consolidated statement of operations under non-operating income (expense).

Our Company evaluates all of its financial instruments to determine if such instruments are derivatives or contain features that qualify as embedded derivatives. For derivative financial instruments that are accounted for as liabilities, the derivative instrument is initially recorded at its fair value and is then re-valued at each reporting date, with changes in the fair value reported in the consolidated statements of operations. For stock-based derivative financial instruments, the Company uses a weighted average Binomial option-pricing model to value the derivative instruments at inception and on subsequent valuation dates. The classification of derivative instruments, including whether such instruments should be recorded as liabilities or as equity, is evaluated at the end of each reporting period. Derivative instrument liabilities are classified in the balance sheet as current or non-current based on whether or not net-cash settlement of the derivative instrument could be required within 12 months of the balance sheet date.

FASB ASC Topic 280, “Segment ~~Reporting”~~Reporting’’, requires use of the “management approach” model for segment reporting. The management approach model is based on the way a company’s management organizes segments within the Company for making operating decisions and assessing performance. Reportable segments are based on products and services, geography, legal structure, management structure, or any other manner in which management disaggregates a company.

~~As of March 31, 2021~~The Company’s financial statements reflect that substantially all of ~~the Company’s~~its operations ~~were~~are conducted in three industry segments – (1) paper and paper-based products such as paper cups, cup lids, food containers, etc., which ~~accounted~~accounts for ~~approximately 41%~~approx. 38% of the Company’s revenues as of ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2021; (2) ~~non-medical supplies such as non-medical fascial masks,~~Cannabis products delivery service and sales, which ~~accounted~~accounts for ~~approximately 1%~~approx. 62% of the Company’s total revenues as of ~~March 31, 2021; (3) cannabis products delivery service and sales, which accounted for approximately 58%~~September 30, 2021.

A reconciliation of the Company’s ~~total revenues~~segment operating income to the Consolidated Statements of Operations for September 30, 2021 and 2020 is as ~~March 31, 2021.~~follows:

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842). The new standard establishes an ROU model that requires a lessee to record a ROU asset and a lease liability on the balance sheet for all leases with terms longer than 12 months. Leases will be classified as either finance or operating, with classification affecting the pattern of expense recognition in the income statement. The new standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. A modified retrospective transition approach is required for lessees for capital and operating leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements, with certain practical expedients available. The Company have adopted this ASU on the consolidated financial statements in the quarter ended September 30, 2019.

In December 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-12, “Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes”. The pronouncement simplifies the accounting for income taxes by removing certain exceptions to the general principles in ASC Topic 740, “Income Taxes”. The pronouncement also improves consistent application of and simplifies GAAP for other areas of Topic 740 by clarifying and amending existing guidance. ASU 2019-12 will be effective for us beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2021, with early adoption permitted. We are still evaluating the impact this guidance will have on our consolidated financial statements.

In January 2020, the FASB issued ASU No. 2020-01, Investments - Equity Securities (Topic 321), Investments - Equity Method and Joint Ventures (Topic 323), and Derivative and Hedging (Topic 815), which clarifies the interaction of rules for equity securities, the equity method of accounting, and forward contracts and purchase options on certain types of securities. The guidance clarifies how to account for the transition into and out of the equity method of accounting when considering observable transactions under the measurement alternative. The ASU is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2020, including interim reporting periods within those annual periods, with early adoption permitted. WeThe Company have adopted this ASU on the consolidated financial statements in the year ended June 30, 2021. The adoption had no material impact on the consolidated financial statements in the year ended June 30, 2021 and three months ended September 30, 2021.

In August 2020, the FASB issued ASU 2020-06, “Debt – Debt with Conversion and Other Options (Subtopic 470-20) and Derivatives and Hedging – Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity (Subtopic 815 – 40)” (“ASU 2020-06”). ASU 2020-06 simplifies the accounting for certain financial instruments with characteristics of liabilities and equity, including convertible instruments and contracts on an entity’s own equity. The ASU is part of the FASB’s simplification initiative, which aims to reduce unnecessary complexity in U.S. GAAP. The ASU’s amendments are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2023, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of ~~the new guidance~~ASU 2020-06 on ~~our consolidated~~its financial statements.

For the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2021 and 2020, our Company earned net revenues of ~~$2,851,822~~$1,168,781 and ~~$1,891,140~~$2,146,326 respectively. The vast majority of these revenues for the period ~~ended March 31,~~ending September 30, 2021 were derived from a large number of customers, whereas the vast majority of these revenues for the period ~~ended March 31,~~ending September 30, 2020 were also derived from a ~~limited~~large number of customers. ~~There was one customer that accounted for approximately 11.6% of the Company’s total revenues for the period ended March 31, 2021.~~

For the period ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2021, we purchased products for sale by the Company’s subsidiary from several contract manufacturers located in Asia and the U.S. A substantial portion of the Company’s inventory was purchased from two (2) suppliers. The two suppliers accounted for ~~33.2%~~25.5% and ~~19.40%~~16.20%, respectively, of the Company’s total inventory purchase for the period ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2021.

For the period ended March 31, 2020, we purchased products for sale by the company’s subsidiaries from several contract manufacturers located in Asia and the U.S. A substantial portion of the Company’s inventory is purchased from two (2) suppliers. The two (2) suppliers accounted as follows: Two suppliers accounted for 31.21% and 17.80% of the Company’s total inventory purchase for the period ended March 31, 2020, respectively.

On February 7, 2020, the Company entered into a share sale and purchase agreement (the “Indigo Agreement”) with Indigo Dye Group Corp. (“Indigo”), a corporation located in Sacramento, California. Indigo carries on business as a cannabis seller and delivery business under the name BudCars. The major Cannabis Products include Flower, Edibles, Vape Cartridges, Pre-Rolls, & Concentrates, etc. All the products are finished goods. In addition, Indigo is operating a non-store front retail delivery business (Type-9 License# C9-0000286) in California.

Pursuant to the terms of the Indigo Agreement, the Company ~~agree~~agreed to invest ~~$700,000~~$700,000 (the “Investment”) into Indigo for inventory, equipment, and marketing expenses. The Investment shall be made in twelve monthly equal installments of ~~$58,333~~$58,333 with the acceleration of the payment schedule possible depending on business growth, cash flow needs and capital availability.

In exchange, the Company received 40% of Indigo’s issued ~~shares.~~shares upon execution of the final agreement. The value used for this transaction is $1,750,000 and each percentage (1%) of the company is worth $17,500. In the event that the Company is not able to make a payment of $58,333 in any month, it will have 90 days to cure the default. On the 91st day the investment plan will cease and the amount of invested capital will be calculated based on an enterprise value of $1,750,000 or $17,500 per 1% of owned equity.

In addition, subject to the terms and conditions of the Indigo Agreement, the Company has the option to acquire an additional ~~30%~~30% interest in Indigo. Upon exercise of the option, the Company would obtain control over Indigo.

From late May 2020 until September 30, 2020, the Company was actively involved in development of Indigo’s operations with power to direct the activities and significantly impact Indigo’s economic performance. The Company also has obligations to absorb losses and right to receive benefits from Indigo. As such, in accordance with ASC 810-10-25-38A through 25-38J, Indigo is consolidated as an VIE of the Company.

Starting on October 1, 2020, the Company ~~plans~~began to ~~open~~explore new locations via purchasing equity into other Brand/Franchises to cover delivery for the entire state of California. Therefore, the Company is not likely ~~not~~ to ~~proceeds~~proceed with the option to acquire the additional ~~30%~~30% interest in Indigo at ~~the moment.~~this time. In addition, the Company is no longer ~~involve~~involved in day-to-day operations and the Company will be pursuing cannabis delivery moving forward, independently from Indigo Dye Group. As of ~~October 1, 2020,~~ September 30, 2021, the Company continues to hold approximately ~~29%~~32% of the ownership of Indigo but ceased to have a controlling interest in the partnership and it was deconsolidated and recorded as an investment in nonconsolidated affiliate at its ~~$505,449~~$564,819 estimated fair value and changed to equity method of accounting. See footnote ~~#6 Noncontrolling~~#5 Non-controlling interest and deconsolidation of VIE for details.

Starting in fiscal year ended June 30, 2020, the Company had a variable interest entity, Indigo Dye Group, for accounting purposes. The Company owned approximately ~~29%~~29% of Indigo’s outstanding equity and as of September 30, 2020, involved its day-to-day operations, which gave the Company the power to direct the activities of Indigo that most significantly impact its economic performance. Accordingly, the Company recognized the carrying value of the ~~noncontrolling~~non-controlling interest as a component of total shareholders’ equity, and the consolidated financial statements included the financial position and results of operations of Indigo as of and for the periods ended June 30, 2020 and September 30, 2020.

Starting on October 1, 2020, the Company ~~plans~~planned to open new locations via purchasing equity in other Brand/Franchises to cover delivery for the entire California. Therefore, the Company is not likely at this time to exercise its option to acquire the additional ~~30%~~30% interest in Indigo. In addition, the Company is no longer involved in day-to-day operations of Indigo and going forward, the Company intends to pursue cannabis delivery independent from Indigo. As of October 1, 2020, the Company ceased to have control over the day-to-day business of Indigo and it was deconsolidated and recorded as an investment in nonconsolidated affiliate at its ~~$505,449~~$505,449 estimated fair value and changed to equity method of accounting. Pursuant to the terms of the Indigo agreement, if the Company determines, in its discretion not to continue to make monthly payments, its 40% ownership interest in Indigo will be decreased according to the payment then made. As of ~~and for the quarter ended March~~December 31, ~~2021,~~2020, the Company ~~did not make any~~made $59,370 in additional payments, ~~it still~~and holds approximately ~~29%~~32% of the ownership of Indigo. ~~See~~(See Note ~~4 and Note 5.~~6)

The net asset value of the Company’s variable interest in Indigo Dye Group was approximately ~~$326,812~~$326,812 as of October 1, 2020, the date of deconsolidation. The value of the Company’s variable interest on the date of deconsolidation was based on management’s estimate of the fair value of Indigo at that time. The Company concluded that the market approach was the most appropriate method to determine the fair value of the entity on the date of deconsolidation, given that Indigo raised equity funding from third-party investors around the same period (i.e., level 2 inputs). The Company recognized a gain on deconsolidation of approximately ~~$313,928~~$313,928 with no related tax impact, which is included in other income, net on the consolidated statement of operations. As the Company is not obligated to fund future losses of Indigo, the carrying amount is the Company’s maximum risk of ~~loss.~~loss and accounted as equity method investment in affiliates in our consolidated financial statements as of and for the period ended September 30, 2021. As of September 30, 2021 and June 30, 2021, the Company recorded equity method investment in affiliates at $396,930 and $441,407, net with $44,477 and $123,412 loss from equity method investment, respectively in each case.

From time to time and in the course of business, we may become involved in various legal proceedings seeking monetary damages and other relief. The amount of the ultimate liability, if any, from such claims cannot be determined. ~~Except as set forth below, as~~As of ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2021, there were no legal claims pending or threatened against the Company that, in the opinion of our management would be likely to have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

~~On December 11, 2013,~~ However, as of the ~~Company was served with a complaint from two convertible note holders and investors~~date of this filing, we were involved in the Company. On February 21, 2017, the Company signed a settlement agreement with the plaintiffs in the matter of Hannan vs. Sugarmade. Under the terms of the settlement agreement, the company agreed to pay the plaintiffs an aggregate of $227,000 to settle all claims against the Company, which included the payoff of two notes outstanding. The parties had estimated the value of the notes at approximately $80,000. As of June 30, 2020, third parties had purchased two (2) notes of approximately $80,000. As of March 31, 2021, there remains a balance, plus accrued interest on the $227,000 and on the $80,000 due under the notes.following legal proceedings.

There can be no assurances the ultimate liability relative to these lawsuits will not exceed what is outlined above.

Cash and cash equivalents consist of amounts held as bank deposits and highly liquid debt instruments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less.

From time to time, we may maintain bank balances in interest bearing accounts in excess of the ~~$250,000~~$250,000 currently insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation for interest bearing accounts (there is currently no insurance limit for deposits in noninterest bearing accounts). We have not experienced any losses with respect to cash. Management believes our Company is not exposed to any significant credit risk with respect to its cash.

Accounts receivable are carried at their estimated collectible amounts, net of any estimated allowances for doubtful accounts. We grant unsecured credit to our customer’s deemed credit worthy. Ongoing credit evaluations are performed and potential credit losses estimated by management are charged to operations on a regular basis. At the time, any particular account receivable is deemed uncollectible, the balance is charged to the allowance for doubtful accounts. The Company had accounts receivable, net of ~~allowances~~allowance, of ~~$75,040~~$656,809 and $435,598 as of ~~March 31, 2021 and of $134,517 as of June~~September 30, ~~2020.~~

~~Loans receivable amounted $0 and $1,365 as of March 31,~~ 2021 and June 30, ~~2020,~~2021, respectively; and allowance for doubtful accounts of $581,039 and $259,761 as of September 30, 2021 and June 30, 2021, respectively.

Loan receivables amounted $196,000($0 current and $196,000 noncurrent) and $196,000 ($0 current and $196,000 noncurrent) as of September 30, 2021 and June 30, 2021, respectively. Loan receivables are mainly advanced payments to the other companies.

Loan receivables – related parties amounted $404,931 ($208,931 current and $196,000 noncurrent) and $318,535 ($122,535 current and $196,000 noncurrent) as of March 31, 2021 and June 30, 2020, respectively. Loan receivables – related parties are mainly advanced payments to the related party companies for business expense.

Inventory consists of finished goods paper and paper-based products such as paper cups and food containers ready for sale and is stated at the lower of cost or market. We value our inventory using the weighted average costing method. Our Company’s policy is to include as a part of inventory any freight incurred to ship the product from our contract manufacturers to our warehouses. Outbound freights costs related to shipping costs to our customers are considered period costs and ~~are~~ reflected in selling, general and administrative expenses. We regularly review inventory and consider forecasts of future demand, market conditions and product obsolescence.

If the estimated realizable value of our inventory is less than cost, we make provisions in order to reduce its carrying value to its estimated market value. On a consolidated basis, as of ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2021 and June 30, ~~2020,~~2021, the balance for the inventory totaled ~~$692,460~~ $609,457 and ~~$679,471,~~$441,582, respectively. ~~Obsolescence reserve at March 31,~~$0was reserved for obsolescent inventory for the period ended September 30, 2021, and $0 were reserved for obsolescent inventory for the year ended June 30, ~~2020 were $183,974 and $15,445, respectively.~~2021.

As of ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2021 and June 30, ~~2020,~~2021, other current assets consisted of the following:

On ~~August 21,~~April 1, 2017, the Company entered into ana distribution and intellectual property assignment agreement with ~~Sound Decisions to revamp~~Wagner Bartosch, Inc. (“Wagner’’) for use of their Divider’™ used in frozen desserts and other related uses. In lieu of cash payment under the ~~Company’s shoplifty website to generate and attract more traffic from potential customers. The Company made a payment of $14,000 for the website (intellectual property). In addition,~~agreement, the Company ~~made a payment~~was obliged to issue common shares of ~~$5,800~~ the Company valued at $75,000 for acquiring the ~~website (intellectual property) during~~use right of the ~~three months ended March 31, 2021.~~distribution and intellectual property. The Company amortized this use right as intangible asset over ten years, and recorded $1,533 and $1,400 amortization expense ~~of $1,022~~ for the ~~nine months~~period ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2021 and ~~2020,~~June 30, 2021, respectively.

On May 17, 2021, the Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) by and between Carnaby Spot Bay Corp, a California corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company (“Merger Sub”), Lemon Glow Company, a California corporation (the “Lemon Glow”) and Ryan Santiago (the “Shareholder Representative”), pursuant to which, upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement, Merger Sub would merge with and into Lemon Glow, with Lemon Glow being the surviving corporation (the “Merger”). The Company valued the cannabis cultivation license from Lemon Glow at $10,648,861with remaining economic life of 9 years as of June 30, 2021. The intangible assets have not started to amortize as of September 30, 2021.

Goodwill arises from the acquisition method of accounting for business combinations and represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net assets and other identifiable intangible assets acquired. The fair values of net tangible assets and intangible assets acquired are based upon preliminary valuations and the Company’s estimates and assumptions are subject to change within the measurement period. There was $757,648 and $757,648 of goodwill recorded as of September 30, 2021 and June 30, 2021, respectively.

As of ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2021 and June 30, ~~2020,~~2021, property, plant and equipment consisted of the following:

Fixed Assets	March 31, 2021			June 30, 2020			September 30, 2021			June 30, 2021
Office and equipment	$	732,062		$	739,447		$	820,149		$	820,149
Motor vehicles		119,764			164,244			165,579			166,079
Land								2,554,767			1,922,376
Building								197,609			—
Leasehold Improvement		21,970			24,470			365,620			365,620
Total		873,797			928,161			4,103,725			3,274,224
Less: accumulated depreciation		(483,608	)		(429,116	)		(566,523	)		(524,884	)
Plant and Equipment, net	$	390,189		$	499,045
Property, Plant and Equipment, net							$	3,537,202		$	2,749,340

For the periods ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2021 and June 30, ~~2020,~~2021, depreciation expenses amounted to ~~$70,650~~ $41,639 and ~~$110,032,~~$105,982, respectively.

The Company reviews the carrying value of property and equipment for impairment whenever events and circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable from the estimated future cash flows expected to result from its use and eventual disposition. In cases where undiscounted expected future cash flows are less than the carrying value, an impairment loss is recognized equal to an amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair value of assets. The factors considered by management in performing this assessment include current operating results, trends and prospects, the manner in which the property is used, and the effects of obsolescence, demand, competition and other economic factors. Based on this assessment, no0 impairment expenses for property, plant, and equipment was recorded in operating expenses during the periods ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2021 and June 30, ~~2020.~~2021.

For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2020, the Company accounted for its investment in Indigo Dye Group as a variable interest entity. The Company owned approximately 29% of Indigo’s outstanding equity and as of September 30, 2020, involved its day-to-day operations, which gave the Company the power to direct the activities of Indigo that most significantly impact its economic performance. Accordingly, the Company recognized the carrying value of the non-controlling interest as a component of total shareholders’ equity, and the consolidated financial statements included the financial position and results of operations of Indigo as of and for the periods ended June 30, 2021 and September 30, 2021.

During quarter ended December 31, 2020, the Company began plans to open new locations via purchasing equity in other Brand/Franchises to cover delivery for the entire California. Therefore, the Company is not likely at this time to exercise its option to acquire the additional 30% interest in Indigo. In addition, the Company is no longer involved in day-to-day operations of Indigo and going forward, the Company intends to pursue cannabis delivery independent from Indigo. As of October 1, 2020, the Company ceased to have control over the day-to-day business of Indigo and it was deconsolidated and recorded as an investment in nonconsolidated affiliate at its $564,819 estimated fair value and changed to equity method of accounting. Pursuant to the terms of the Indigo agreement, if the Company determines, in its discretion not to continue to make monthly payments, its 40% ownership interest in Indigo will be decreased according to the payment then made. As of September 30, 2021, the Company did not receive any distributions nor dividends from Indigo Dye. In addition, the Company impaired $43,800 of the investment as of December 31, 2020 due to lack of providing financial information from Indigo Dye Inc. As of September 30, 2021, the Company still held approximately 32% of the ownership of Indigo Dye Group.

As of September 30, 2021, the Company recorded equity method investment in affiliates at $396,930, net with $44,477 loss from equity method investment.

In October 2019, the Company entered into a share exchange agreement (the “Share Exchange Agreement”) with iPower Inc., formerly known as BZRTH Inc. (the “Company”), a Nevada corporation, pursuant to which, among other things, the Company agreed to buy 100% of the issued and outstanding capital stock of iPower Inc. in exchange for $870,000 in cash, $7,130,000 under a promissory note, up to 650,000 shares of Sugarmade’s common stock, and up to 3,500,000 shares of Sugarmade’s Series B preferred stock.

Due to certain disputes that arose between the parties with respect to certain terms and conditions contained in the Share Exchange Agreement, the parties entered into a Rescission and Mutual Release Agreement on January 15, 2020 (the “Rescission Agreement”). Pursuant to the terms of the Rescission Agreement, iPower Inc. and its stockholders returned the shares of Sugarmade common stock and preferred stock and issued to Sugarmade 102,248 (204,496 post forward split) shares of the Company’s common stock valued at current market value of $1,451,922 as of June 30, 2021. The shares are free trading.

For the years ended September 30, 2021 and June 30, 2021, unrealized gain on securities amounted at current market value of $809,804 and $1,451,922, respectively.

Unearned revenue amounted to ~~$9,379~~$20,265 and ~~$53,248~~$0 as of ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2021 and June 30, ~~2020,~~2021, respectively. Unearned revenues are mainly due to contracts with extended payment terms, acceptance provisions and future delivery obligation.

~~Other~~Accounts payable and accrued liabilities amounted ~~to $812,069~~ $2,185,429 and ~~$691,801~~ $2,058,839 as of ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2021 and June 30, ~~2020,~~2021, respectively. Accounts payables are mainly payables to vendors and accrued liabilities are mainly accrued interest of convertible notes payables and accrued contingent liabilities.

Other payables amounted $697,813 and $750,485 as of September 30, 2021 and June 30, 2021, respectively. Other payables are mainly credit card ~~payables and taxes~~ payables. As of ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2021, the Company had 8 credit cards, one American Express is a charge card with no0 limit and zero interest. The remaining 7 cards had total credit limit of ~~$85,000,~~$85,000, and APR from 11.24% to 29.99%.

AsCustomer deposits amounted $861,906and $751,919as of ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2021 and June 30, ~~2020,~~2021, respectively. Customer deposits are mainly advanced payments from customers.

As of September 30, 2021 and June 30, 2021, the balance owing on convertible notes, net of debt discount, with terms as described below was ~~$1,982,902~~$1,224,095 and ~~$1,740,122,~~$1,439,116, respectively.

Convertible notes issued prior to the year ended June 30, 2021 were as follows:

Convertible note 1: On August 24, 2012, the Company entered into a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for ~~$25,000.~~$25,000. The note has a term of six ~~(6)~~(6) months with an interest rate of 10% and is convertible to common shares at a 25% discount of the average of 30 days prior to the conversion date. As of ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2021, the note is in default.

Convertible note 2: On September 18, 2012, the Company entered into a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for ~~$25,000.~~$25,000. The note has a term of six ~~(6)~~(6) months with an interest rate of 10% and is convertible to common shares at a 25% discount of the average of 30 days prior to the conversion date. As of ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2021, the note is in default.

Convertible note 3: On December 21, 2012, the Company entered into a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for ~~$100,000.~~$100,000. The note has a term of six ~~(6)~~(6) months with an interest rate of 10% and is convertible to common shares at a 25% discount of the average of 30 days prior to the conversion date. As of ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2021, the note is in default.

Convertible note 4: On November 1, 2018, the Company entered into a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for $100,000. The note has a term of one year with an interest rate of 8% and is convertible to common shares at a fixed conversion price of $0.07. As of March 31, 2021, the note is in default.

~~Convertible note 5:~~ On November 16, 2018, the Company entered into a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for ~~$80,000.~~$40,000. The note has a term of one year with an interest rate of 8% and is convertible to common shares at a fixed conversion price of ~~$0.07.~~$0.07. As of ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2021, the note is in default.

Convertible note 6: On November 16, 2018, the Company entered into a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for $40,000. The note has a term of one year with an interest rate of 8% and is convertible to common shares at a fixed conversion price of $0.07. As of March 31, 2021, the note is in default.

~~Convertible note 7:~~5: On December 3, 2018, the Company entered into a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for ~~$35,000.~~$35,000. The note has a term of one year with an interest rate of 8% and is convertible to common shares at a fixed conversion price of ~~$0.07.~~$0.07. As of ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2021, the note is in default.

Convertible note 8:6: On ~~September 27,~~October 31, 2019, the Company ~~issued~~entered a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of ~~$165,000 (includes $16,250 OID)~~$139,301. The note is due 360 days after issuance and ~~bear an~~bears interest at a rate of 8%. The conversion price for the note is 55% of the lowest closing bid for the 20 consecutive trading days prior to the conversion date. During the year ended June 30, 2020, the note holder converted $50,000 principal with $2,992 interest expense into 56,007,062 shares of the Company’s common stock. As of March 31, 2021, the note has been fully converted.

Convertible note 9: On October 28, 2019, the Company issued a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $225,500 (includes $23,000 OID). The note is due 360 days and bear an interest rate of 8%. The conversion price for the note is 60% of the lowest closing bid for the 20 consecutive trading days prior to the conversion date. As of March 31, 2021, the note has been fully converted.

Convertible note 10: On October 28, 2019, the Company issued a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $225,500 (includes $23,000 OID). The note is due 360 days and bear an interest rate of 8%. The conversion price for the note is 60% of the lowest closing bid for the 20 consecutive trading days prior to the conversion date. As of March 31, 2021, the note has been fully converted.

Convertible note 11: On November 29, 2019, the Company issued a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $106,150 (includes $11,150 OID). The note is due 360 days and bear an interest rate of 8%. The conversion price for the note is 60% of the lowest closing bid for the 20 consecutive trading days prior to the conversion date. As of March 31, 2021, the note has been fully converted.

Convertible note 12: On November 29, 2019, the Company issued a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $106,150 (includes $11,150 OID). The note is due 360 days and bear an interest rate of 8%. The conversion price for the note is 60% of the lowest closing bid for the 20 consecutive trading days prior to the conversion date. As of March 31, 2021, the note has been fully converted.

Convertible note 13: On December 10, 2019, the Company issued a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $106,700 (includes $11,700 OID). The note is due 360 days and bear an interest rate of 8%. The conversion price for the note is 60% of the lowest closing bid for the 20 consecutive trading days prior to the conversion date. As of March 31, 2021, the note has been fully converted.

Convertible note 14: On December 10, 2019, the Company issued a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $106,700 (includes $11,700 OID). The note is due 360 days and bear an interest rate of 8%. The conversion price for the note is 60% of the lowest closing bid for the 20 consecutive trading days prior to the conversion date. As of March 31, 2021, the note has been fully converted.

Convertible note 15: On December 27, 2019, the Company issued a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $112,200 (includes $12,200 OID). The note is due 360 days and bear an interest rate of 8%. The conversion price for the note is 60% of the lowest closing bid for the 20 consecutive trading days prior to the conversion date. As of March 31, 2021, the note has been fully converted.

Convertible note 16: On October 31, 2019, the Company issued a convertible promissory note with a former consultant for a total amount of $139,301. The note is due 360 days and bear an interest rate of 8%. The conversion price for the note is $0.008$0.008 per share. On October 1, 2020, the Company entered an amendment to settlement note to amend the conversion price at 60% of the lowest trading bid price in the 20 consecutive trading days immediately preceding to the conversion date.

Convertible note ~~17:~~7: On November 1, 2019, the Company ~~issued~~entered a convertible promissory note with ~~a former consultant~~an accredited investor for a total amount of ~~$100,000.~~$100,000. The note is due 360 days after issuance and ~~bear an~~bears interest at a rate of 8%. The conversion price for the note is ~~$0.008~~$0.008 per share. On October 1, 2020, the Company entered an amendment to settlement note to amend the conversion price at 60% of the lowest trading bid price in the 20 consecutive trading days immediately preceding to the conversion date.

Convertible note ~~18:~~8: On ~~January 3,~~September 8, 2020, the Company ~~issued~~entered a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of ~~$112,200~~$110,000 (includes ~~$12,200~~$10,000 OID). The note is due ~~360~~180 days after issuance and ~~bear an~~bears interest at a rate of 8%12%. The conversion price for the note is ~~60%~~$0.01 per share. After the six-month anniversary of this note, the conversion price shall be equal to the lower of the fixed price of $0.01 or 65% of the lowest ~~closing bid~~trading price of the common stock for the 20 ~~consecutive~~ prior trading days ~~prior to~~including the day upon which a conversion ~~date.~~notice is received by the Company or its transfer agent. As of ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2021, the note has been fully converted.

Convertible note ~~19:~~9: On ~~January 14,~~September 10, 2020, the Company ~~issued~~entered a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of ~~$150,000~~$227,700 (includes ~~$3,000 OID)~~$20,700 OID and $7,000 legal expense). The note is due 360 days after issuance and ~~bear an~~bears interest at a rate of 8%. The conversion price for the note is ~~38% discount to average~~60% of ~~three~~the lowest ~~closing prices~~trading bid for the 1020 consecutive trading days prior to the conversion date. During the ~~three months~~year ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2020,~~2021, the note holder converted ~~$50,000~~$117,700 of the principal amount plus $7,352 accrued interest expense into ~~29,868,578~~90,167,551 shares of the Company’s common stock. As of ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2021, the ~~remaining principal and unpaid interest~~note has been fully ~~repaid by cash.~~converted.

Convertible note ~~20:~~10: On ~~January 22,~~September 24, 2020, the Company ~~issued~~entered a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of ~~$128,000~~$212,300 (includes ~~$3,000~~$19,300 OID). The note is due ~~360~~180 days after issuance and ~~bear an~~bears interest at a rate of ~~10%~~12%. The conversion price for the note is 35% discount to average of two lowest closing prices for the 20 consecutive trading days prior to the conversion date. As of March 31, 2021, the note principal and unpaid interest has been fully repaid by cash.

Convertible note 21: On February 4, 2020, the Company issued a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $110,000 (includes $10,000 OID). The note is due 360 days and bear an interest rate of 12%. The conversion price for the note is $0.001 per share. As of March 31, 2021, the note has been fully converted.

Convertible note 22: On February 18, 2020, the Company issued a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $100,000 (includes $10,000 OID). The note is due 360 days and bear an interest rate of 12%. The conversion price for the note is $0.001 per share.

Convertible note 23: On March 5, 2020, the Company issued a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $125,000 (includes $3,000 OID). The note is due 360 days and bear an interest rate of 8%. The conversion price for the note is 38% discount to average of three lowest closing prices for the 10 consecutive trading days prior to the conversion date. As of December 31, 2020, the note has been fully converted.

Convertible note 24: On April 24, 2020, the Company issued a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $75,000 (includes $2,000 OID). The note is due 360 days and bear an interest rate of 8%. The conversion price for the note is 38% discount to average of three lowest trading prices for the 10 consecutive trading days prior to the conversion date.

Convertible note 25: On June 10, 2020, the Company issued a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $36,300 (includes $3,300 OID and $3,000 legal expense). The note is due 360 days and bear an interest rate of 8%. The conversion price for the note is 60% of the lowest trading bid for the 20 consecutive trading days prior to the conversion date.

Convertible note 26: On June 18, 2020, the Company issued a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $36,300 (includes $3,300 OID and $3,000 legal expense). The note is due 360 days and bear an interest rate of 8%. The conversion price for the note is 60% of the lowest closing bid for the 20 consecutive trading days prior to the conversion date.

Convertible note 27: On July 6, 2020, the Company issued a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $77,000 (includes $2,000 OID). The note is due 360 days and bear an interest rate of 8%. The conversion price for the note is 38% discount to average of three lowest trading prices for the 10 consecutive trading days prior to the conversion date.

Convertible note 28: On July 7, 2020, the Company issued a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $153,000 (includes $3,000 OID). The note is due 360 days and bear an interest rate of 10%. The conversion price for the note is 35% discount to average of two lowest trading prices for the 20 consecutive trading days prior to the conversion date.

Convertible note 29: On July 16, 2020, the Company issued a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $260,700 (includes $23,700 OID and $12,000 legal expense). The note is due 360 days and bear an interest rate of 8%. The conversion price for the note is 60% of the lowest trading bid for the 20 consecutive trading days prior to the conversion date.

Convertible note 30: On July 21, 2020, the Company issued a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $200,200 (includes $18,200 OID and $7,000 legal expense). The note is due 360 days and bear an interest rate of 8%. The conversion price for the note is 60% of the lowest trading bid for the 20 consecutive trading days prior to the conversion date.

Convertible note 31: On September 8, 2020, the Company issued a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $110,000 (includes $10,000 OID). The note is due 180 days and bear an interest rate of 12%. The conversion price for the note is $0.01$0.01 per share. After the ~~six month~~six-month anniversary of this note, the conversion price shall be equal to the lower of the fixed price of $0.01 or 65% of the lowest trading price of the common stock for the 20 prior trading days including the day upon which a conversion notice is received by the Company or its transfer agent. As of September 30, 2021, the note was in default.

Convertible note ~~32:~~11: On ~~September 10,~~October 8, 2020, the Company ~~issued~~entered a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of ~~$227,700~~$231,000 (includes ~~$20,700 OID and $7,000 legal expense)~~$21,000 OID). The note is due ~~360~~180 days after issuance and ~~bear an~~bears interest at a rate of 8%12%. The conversion price for the note is ~~60% of the lowest trading bid for the 20 consecutive trading days prior to the conversion date.~~

Convertible note 33: On September 24, 2020, the Company issued a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $212,300 (includes $19,300 OID). The note is due 180 days and bear an interest rate of 12%. The conversion price for the note is $0.01$0.01 per share. After the ~~six month~~six-month anniversary of this note, the conversion price shall be equal to the lower of the fixed price of $0.01 or 65% of the lowest trading price of the common stock for the 20 prior trading days including the day upon which a conversion notice is received by the Company or its transfer agent. As of September 30, 2021, the note was in default.

Convertible note ~~34:~~12: On October 8,13, 2020, the Company ~~issued~~entered a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of ~~$231,000~~$275,000 (includes ~~$21,000~~$25,000 OID). The note is due 180 days after issuance and ~~bear an~~bears interest at a rate of 12%. The conversion price for the note is ~~$0.01~~$0.01 per share. After the ~~six month~~six-month anniversary of this note, the conversion price shall be equal to the lower of the fixed price of $0.01 or 65% of the lowest trading price of the common stock for the 20 prior trading days including the day upon which a conversion notice is received by the Company or its transfer agent. As of September 30, 2021, the note was in default.

Convertible note ~~35:~~13: On ~~October 13,~~November 10, 2020, the Company ~~issued~~entered a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of ~~$275,000~~$58,300 (includes ~~$25,000~~$5,300 OID). The note is due ~~180~~360 days after issuance and ~~bear an~~bears interest at a rate of ~~12%~~8%. The conversion price for the note is ~~$0.01 per share. After the six month anniversary of this note, the conversion price shall be equal to the lower of the fixed price of $0.01 or 65%~~60% of the lowest trading ~~price of the common stock~~bid for the 20 ~~prior~~ consecutive trading days ~~including~~prior to the ~~day upon which a~~ conversion ~~notice is received by~~date.

Convertible note 14: On February 8, 2021, the Company ~~or its transfer agent.~~

~~Convertible note 36: On November 10, 2020, the Company issued~~entered a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of ~~$58,300~~$69,300 (includes ~~$5,300~~$6,300 OID). The note is due 360 days after issuance and ~~bear an~~bears interest at a rate of 8%. The conversion price for the note is 60% of the lowest trading bid for the 20 consecutive trading days prior to the conversion date.

Convertible note ~~37:~~15: On ~~February 8,~~June 14, 2021, the Company issued a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of ~~$69,300 (includes $6,300 OID)~~$300,000. The note is due ~~360 days~~in three years and bear an interest rate of 8%1%. The conversion price for the note is ~~60%~~the lesser of $0.0036 and 85% of the ~~lowest~~lesser of (i) 5 days VWAP on the trading ~~bid for the 20 consecutive trading days prior to~~day preceding the conversion date, and (ii) the VWAP on the conversion date.

In connection with the convertible debt, debt discount balance as of ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2021 and June 30, ~~2020~~2021 were ~~$355,752~~$258,507 and ~~$880,879,~~$391,086, respectively, and were being amortized and recorded as interest expenses over the term of the convertible debt.

The derivative liability is derived from the conversion features in note 822 and stock warrant in note ~~10.~~24. All were valued using the weighted-average Binomial option pricing model using the assumptions detailed below. As of ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2021 and June 30, ~~2020,~~2021, the derivative liability was ~~$2,301,301~~ $1,315,913and ~~$5,597,095,~~$2,217,361, respectively. The Company recorded ~~$482,232 gain~~$325,234loss and ~~$1,442,295 loss~~$1,087,485 gain from changes in derivative liability during the periods ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2021 and June 30, ~~2020,~~2021, respectively. The Binomial model with the following assumption inputs:

On September 7, 2018, the Company entered into a settlement agreement with several investors to settle all disputes by ~~issues~~issuing additional unrestricted shares. In connection with the note each individual investor will also receive warrants equal to the number of the shares the investors own as of the effective date of the settlement agreement. The warrants have a life of five yearswith an exercise price as of the date of exchange. The fair value of the warrants at the grant date was ~~$56,730.~~$56,730. As of ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2021 and June 30, ~~2020,~~2021, the fair value of the warrant liability was ~~$1,216~~ $753 and ~~$1,910,~~$1,042, respectively.

On February 4, 2020, the Company entered into a warrant agreement with an accredited investor for up to 10,000,000 shares of common stock of the Company at an exercise price of ~~$0.008~~$0.008 per share, subject to adjustment. The warrants have a life of five years with an exercise price as of the date of exchange. The fair value of the warrants at the grant date was ~~$80,000.~~$80,000. As of ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2021 and June 30, ~~2020,~~2021, the fair value of the warrant liability was ~~$23,000~~$12,000 and ~~$78,000,~~$20,000, respectively.

As of ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2021 and June 30, ~~2020,~~2021, the total fair value of the warrant liability was ~~$24,216~~$12,753 and ~~$79,910,~~$21,042, respectively.

During October 2011, we entered into a revolving demand note (line of credit) arrangement with HSBC Bank USA, with a revolving borrowing limit of ~~$150,000.~~$150,000. The line of credit bears a variable interest rate of 0.25% above the prime rate ~~(5.5%~~(5.5% as of December 20, 2018). In the event the deposit account is not established or minimum balance maintained, HSBC can charge a higher rate of interest of up to 4.0% above prime ~~rate.~~rate. As of ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2021 and June 30, ~~2020,~~2021, the loan principal balance was ~~$25,982~~$25,982 and ~~$25,982,~~$25,982, respectively.

On June 15, 2018, the Company entered into a promissory note with an accredited investor. The original principal amount was ~~$20,000~~$20,000 and the note bears 8% interest per annum. The note was payable upon demand. As of ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2021 and June 30, ~~2020,~~2021, this note had a balance of ~~$20,000~~$32,041 and ~~$20,000,~~$33,047, respectively.

On October 6, 2020, the Company entered into a promissory note with Darryl Kuecker, and Shirley Ann Hunt (the “Trustee”) for borrowing $1,390,000 with annual interest rate of 6% due in 30 years. Darryl Kuecker, Trustee of the 2002 Darry Keucker Revocable Trust as to an undivided 36% interest, and Shirley Ann Hunt, Trustee of the 2002 Shirley Ann Hunt Revocable Trust as to an undivided 64% interest. Principal and interest shall be payable on monthly basis, in installments of $8,333.75, beginning on November 1, 2020 and until September 1, 2050. Payments to be divided and made separately to each beneficiary per the beneficiary’s instruction: $3,000.15 to Darryl Kuecker, Trustee and $5,333.60 to Shirley Hunt, Trustee. As of September 30, 2021 and June 30, 2021, the Company has an outstanding balance of $1,373,872 and $1,378,222, respectively.

On May 12, 2021, the Company entered into a promissory note with Lemon Glow Shareholders. The original principal amount was $3,976,000 and the note bears interest at the rate of 5% per year 36 monthly payments commencing on June 15, 2021. As of September 30, 2021 and June 30, 2021, the note had a remaining balance of 3,556,000 and $3,626,000, respectively.

On January 23, 2013, the Company entered into a promissory note with a former employee of the Company. The original principal amount was ~~$40,000~~$40,000 and the note bears no interest. The note was payable upon demand. As of ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2021 and June 30, ~~2020,~~2021, this note had a balance of ~~$15,427~~$0 and ~~$15,427,~~$15,427, respectively.

On January 23, 2013, SWC received a loan from an employee for $40,000. The amount of loan bears no interest. As of September 30, 2021 and June 30, 2021, the balance of loans payable is $0 and $15,427, respectively.

On July 7, 2016, SWC received a loan from an employee. The amount of the loan bears no interest and amortized on a monthly basis over the life of the loan. As of September 30, 2021 and June 30, 2021, the balance of the loans payable were $0 and $49,447, respectively.

On November 21, 2016, SWC received a loan from an employee. The amount of the loan bears no interest and due in September 30, 2017. As of September 30, 2021. the note was in default. As of September 30, 2021 and June 30, 2021, the balance of the loans payable were $0 and $83,275, respectively.

On May 25, 2021, Lemon Glow received a loan from an officer. The amount of the loan bears no interest and due on demand. As of September 30, 2021 and June 30, 2021, the balance of the loans were $0 and $3,000, respectively.

As of September 30, 2021 and June 30, 2021, the Company had an outstanding balance of $46,871 and $179,258 owed to various related parties, respectively. See note 25 and 27 for the details.

On October 1, 2017, SGMD entered a straight promissory note with Greater Asia Technology Limited (Greater Asia) for borrowing ~~$100,000~~$100,000 with maturity date on June 30, ~~2018;~~2018; the note bears an interest rate of 33.33%. As of ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2021 and June 30, ~~2020,~~2021, the note was in default and the outstanding balance under this note was ~~$61,919~~$49,541 and ~~$96,401,~~$49,541, respectively.

During the year ended June 30, 2019, the Company entered a series of short-term loan agreements with Greater Asia Technology Limited (Greater Asia) for borrowing ~~$375,000,~~$375,000, with interest rate at 40% - 50% of the principal balance. As of ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2021 and June 30, ~~2020,~~2021, the outstanding balance with Greater Asia loans were ~~$100,000~~$100,000 and ~~$100,000,~~$100,000, respectively.

On January 6, 2015, the Company entered into repayment agreement with its former employee for a loan of $9,500 at no interest. As of March 31, 2021 and June 30, 2020, the Company has an outstanding balance of $0 and $3,584, respectively.

On July 1, 2012, ~~CarryOutSupplies~~SWC entered an equipment loan agreement with a bank with maturity on June 21, ~~2024.~~2024. The monthly payment is ~~$648.~~$648. As of ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2021 and June 30, ~~2020,~~2021, the outstanding balance under this loan were ~~$18,735~~$16,805 and ~~$24,524,~~$16,805, respectively.

On March 18, 2020, the Company entered into a loan agreement for $150,000 with Celtic Bank with maturity date on March 18, 2020. As of March 31, 2021 and June 30, 2020, the outstanding balance under this loan were $0 and $117,635, respectively.

On June 26, 2020, the Company entered into a government loan agreement for $8,000 with maturity date on December 26, 2020. As of March 31, 2021 and June 30, 2020, the outstanding balance under this loan were $0 and $8,000, respectively.

~~On April 27,~~July 28, 2020, we entered into a loan borrowed ~~$110,000~~ $159,900 from Bank of America (“Lender”), pursuant to a Promissory Note issued by Company to Lender (the ~~“April 2020 PPP~~“PPP Note”). The loan was made pursuant to the ~~Paycheck~~Payroll Protection Program established as part of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (the “CARES Act”). The ~~April 2020~~ PPP Note bears interest at ~~1.00%~~ 3.75% per annum and may be repaid at any time without penalty. Installment payments, including principal and interest, of $731 monthly, will begin 12 months from the date of the promissory note and the balance of principal and interest will be payable 30 years from the date of the promissory note. The ~~April 2020~~ PPP Note contains customary events of default relating to, among other things, payment defaults, breach of representations and warranties, or provisions of the promissory note. The occurrence of an event of default may result in a claim for the immediate repayment of all amounts outstanding under the ~~April 2020~~ PPP Note.

On July ~~28, 2020,~~27, 2021, the loan amount has been increased to $500,000 and the monthly payment amount has been updated from $731 to $2,527.

On January 25, 2021, we entered into a loan borrowed ~~$159,900~~$96,595 from ~~the Lender,~~Bank of America (“Lender”), pursuant to a Promissory Note issued by Company to Lender (the ~~“July 2020 PPP~~“PPP Note”). The loan was made pursuant to the ~~Paycheck~~Payroll Protection ~~Program.~~Program established as part of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (the “CARES Act”). The ~~July 2020~~ PPP Note bears interest at 1.00% per annum and may be repaid at any time without penalty. The ~~July 2020~~ PPP Note contains customary events of default relating to, among other things, payment defaults, breach of representations and warranties, or provisions of the promissory note. The occurrence of an event of default may result in a claim for the immediate repayment of all amounts outstanding under the ~~July 2020~~ PPP Note.

On January 25, 2021, we entered into a loan borrowed $96,595 from the Lender, pursuant to a Promissory Note issued by Company to Lender (the “January 2021 PPP Note”). The loan was made pursuant to the Paycheck Protection Program. The January 2021 PPP Note bears interest at 1.00% per annum and may be repaid at any time without penalty. The January 2021 PPP Note contains customary events of default relating to, among other things, payment defaults, breach of representations and warranties, or provisions of the promissory note. The occurrence of an event of default may result in a claim for the immediate repayment of all amounts outstanding under the January 2021 PPP Note.

The Company ~~accounted~~accounting for the PPP ~~loans~~loan under Topic 470: (a). Initially record the cash inflow from the PPP loan as a financial liability and would accrue interest in accordance with the interest method under ASC Subtopic 835-30; (b). Not impute additional interest at a market rate; (c). Continue to record the proceeds from the loan as a liability until either (1) the loan is partly or wholly forgiven and the debtor has been legally released or (2) the debtor pays off the loan; (d). Would reduce the liability by the amount forgiven and record a gain on extinguishment once the loan is partly or wholly forgiven and legal release is received.

On February 15, 2021, the Company entered a promissory note with Manuel Rivera for borrowing $100,000 with maturity date on September 15, 2021; the note bears a monthly interest of $3,500 for 7 months. The Company shall pay the investor a fee of $70,000 within 45 days of its first harvest.As of ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2021 and June 30, ~~2020,~~2021, the outstanding loan balance under this note was $100,000 and $100,000, respectively.

On March 24, 2021, the Company entered into auto loan agreement with John Deere Financial for an auto loan of $69,457 for 60 months at annual percentage rate of 2.85%. As of September 30, 2021 and June 30, 2021, the Company has an outstanding balance of $61,010 and $65,726, respectively.

On August 4, 2021, the Company entered into a loan with Coastline Lending Group of $490,000 which to be secured by a deed of trust on the real property at 5058 Valley Blvd, Los Angeles, CA90032. The loan has an interest only balloon payment of $3,471 per month with a term of 36 months. The loan bears an interest rate at 8.5% per annum with maturity date on August 14, 2024. As of September 30, 2021, the Company has an outstanding balance of $490,000.

As of September 30, 2021 and June 30, 2021, the Company had an outstanding loan balance of ~~$716,716~~ $1,484,162 and ~~$517,260,~~$701,193, respectively.

On July 7, 2016, SWC received a loan from an employee. The amount of the loan bears no interest and amortized on a monthly basis over the life of the loan. As of ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2021 and June 30, ~~2020,~~2021, the balance of the loan ~~was $63,778~~were $0 and ~~$35,943,~~$49,447, respectively.

~~Starting on~~ On November 21, 2016, SWC received a loan from a former independent consultant. The amount of the loan bears no interest and due in September 30, ~~2020, the Company received loans from related parties. The loans bear no interest.~~2017. As of ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2021. the note was in default. As of September 30, 2021 and June 30, ~~2020,~~2021, the balance of the loans were $0 and $83,275, respectively.

On September 1, 2017, the Company had related party transaction with LMK Capital LLC, a related party company owned by Jimmy Chan, the Company’s CEO. The amount of the loan payable/receivable bears no interest and is due on demand. As of ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2021 and June 30, ~~2020,~~2021, the balance of the loan payable to LMK were $46,871 and $26,452, respectively, and the balance of loan receivable were $0 and $0, respectively.

As of September 30, 2021 and June 30, 2021, the Company had an outstanding related party loan balance ~~– related parties~~ of ~~$238,150~~$46,871 and ~~$35,943,~~$163,831, respectively.

~~During the year ended~~As of September 30, 2021 and June 30, ~~2020,~~2021, the Company had entered into one consulting service agreement and one employment agreement, which had potential shares to be issued in total amount of ~~$110,577.~~$239,577 and $138,077, respectively.

During the ~~six~~three months ended ~~December 31, 2020,~~September 30, 2021, the Company had potential shares to be issued to ~~one~~the consulting agreement of ~~$31,000. The shares had been issued during~~$36,500 and to the ~~three months ended March 31, 2021.~~employment agreement of $203,077.

~~As of March 31, 2021 and June 30, 2020, the Company had a balance of $136,577 and $101,577 shares to be issued, respectively.~~

The Company is authorized to issue 10,000,000,000 shares of ~~$.001~~$.001 par value common stock and 10,000,000 shares of ~~$.001~~$.001 par value preferred stock. On April 22, 2020, the Company filed an amendment to increase the total authorized shares to 10,010,000,000 – 10,000,000,000 of which are designated as common stock, par ~~$0.001~~$0.001 per share and 10,000,000 of which are designated as preferred stock, par value ~~$0.001~~$0.001 per share.

During the three months ended September 30, ~~2020,~~2021, the Company issued ~~1,081,411,606~~375,600,448 shares of common stock for debt conversions in a total amount of ~~$1,273,459.~~$385,266.

During the three months ended ~~December 31, 2020, the Company issued 411,171,815 shares of common stock for debt conversions in total amount of $320,879.~~

During the periods from December 14, 2014 through March 31, 2015, the Company issued 2,000,000 Series A preferred shares from an EB5 Program Investment. Five years from the date of issue (the “Conversion Date”), assuming Investor is approved for l-526, and each Preferred Share will automatically convert into that number of Common Shares having a “fair market value” of the Initial Investment plus a five (5) percent annualized return on Initial Investment, Fair market value will be determined by averaging the closing sale price of a Common Share for the 40 trading days immediately preceding the date of conversion on the U.S. stock exchange on which Common Shares are publicly traded. Should the Investor be unsuccessful in liquidating the Common Shares within 90 days after the Conversion Date, the Company shall buy back total Common Shares owned by Investor at a fixed amount of $500,000.00 plus 5% ROI per annum.

During the three months ended December 31, 2020, those shares were automatically converted into 360,647,019 of common shares with a fair market value of $2,000,000 of initial investment plus a five percent annualized return on initial investment (“ROI”), or total ROI of $500,000.

~~During the three months ended March 31,~~September 30, 2021, the Company issued ~~499,374,305 shares of common stock for debt conversions in the total amount of $403,755.~~

~~During the three months ended March 31, 2021, the Company issued 587,222,222~~660,571,429 shares of common stock in exchange for ~~$1,012,000 in cash.~~the Lemon Glow acquisition for a total fair value of $1,849,600.

During the three months ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2021, the Company issued ~~15,000,000~~2,000,000 shares of ~~common~~series B preferred stock in exchange for ~~services with a~~the Lemon Glow acquisition in total fair value of ~~$37,500.~~$5,600,000.

As of ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2021 and June 30, ~~2020,~~2021, the Company had ~~1,541,500~~8,438,707,554 and 7,402,535,677 shares of its common stock issued and outstanding, respectively.

As of September 30, 2021 and June 30, 2021, the Company had 2,541,500 and 541,500 shares of its series B preferred stock issued and outstanding, respectively.

As of September 30, 2021 and ~~4,718,104,197~~June 30, 2021, the Company had 1 and ~~1,763,277,230 shares~~1 share of its ~~common~~series C preferred stock ~~respectively,~~ issued and ~~outstanding.~~outstanding, respectively.

On February 23, 2018, the Company entered into a lease agreement for a new office space ~~commencing~~as part of the plan to expand operation, the lease commenced on March 1, 2018. The term of the lease is for five (5) years with ~~one~~1 month free inon the ~~first~~1^st year of the term. The monthly rent inon the ~~first~~1st year ~~was $11,770~~will be $11,770 with a 3% increase for each subsequent year. Total commitment for the full term of the lease ~~is $737,367.~~will be $737,367. As of the date of this filing, this property became the Company’s headquarters.

~~Our~~The Company’s warehouse along with ~~some~~ancillary office space is located at 20529 East Walnut Drive North, Diamond Bar, California, where we lease approximately 11,627 square feet of combined space. The lease term is for five (5) years and two (2) months ending on April 30, 2025. The current monthly rental payment for the facility is ~~$13,022.~~$13,022.

On February 1, 2021, the Company entered into lease agreement with Magnolia Extracts, LLC dba Nug Ave-Lynwood, a California limited liability company for a certain regulatory permit issued by the City of Lynwood authorizing commercial retailer non-storefront operations at 11118 Wright Road, Lynwood, CA 90262. The lease was set to commence on February 1, 2021. The lease payment shall equal $10,000 per month and the lease term is on month-by-month basis. Parties have agreed that the first month’s rent payment shall equal $7,000 and the Company owed the landlord a refundable security deposit of $20,000 within 10 days of the commencement date.

	Operating			Operating
Period ending June 30,	Lease
2021	$	78,825
Period ending September 30, 2021				Lease
2022		305,040		$	307,405
2023		273,425			234,925
2024		172,465			172,465
2025		147,446			103,476
Total lease payments		977,200			818,270

Less: Imputed interest/present value discount		(154,780	)		(114,833	)
Present value of lease liabilities	$	822,420		$	703,437

On ~~April 5,~~October 13, 2021, the Company entered into a stock subscription agreement to issue ~~194,444,445~~200,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock in exchange for ~~$350,000~~$240,000 in cash.

On ~~April 15,~~October 28, 2021, the Company entered into a stock subscription agreement to issue ~~194,444,445~~169,999,999 shares of the Company’s common stock in exchange for ~~$350,000~~$204,000 in cash.

On ~~April 26,~~November 12, 2021, there was one note holder converted $150,000 of the ~~Company entered~~convertible note into ~~a stock subscription agreement to issue 100,000,000~~214,285,714 shares of the Company’s common ~~stock in exchange for $180,000 in cash.~~stocks.

~~On April 27, 2021, the Company entered into a stock subscription agreement to issue 194,444,445 shares of the Company’s common stock for cash in total amount of $350,000.~~

~~Subsequent to May 14, 2021, a note holder converted approximately~~ ~~$52,500 of convertible notes into 40,753,063 shares of the Company’s common~~ ~~stock~~.

On May 12, 2021, entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) by and between Carnaby Spot Bay Corp, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company (“Merger Sub”), Lemon Glow Company (“Lemon Glow”) and Ryan Santiago (the “Shareholder Representative”).

Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, the parties to the Merger Agreement agreed that, upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement, Merger Sub would merge with and into Lemon Glow (the “Merger”) at which time the separate corporate existence of Merger Sub would cease, with Lemon Glow being the surviving corporation in the Merger.

~~As consideration for the Merger, Company agreed to provide to the shareholders of Lemon Glow (the “Lemon Glow Shareholders”), at the closing of the Merger (the “Closing”):~~

~~The individual items of consideration above are referred to collectively as the “Merger Consideration”.~~

Lemon Glow is the owner of a 640-acre property located in Lake Country, California. Lemon Glow is in the process of improving 32 acres of the 640 acres for use as a regulated cannabis cultivation site. The Company and Lemon Glow expect that the annual potential cultivation yield at the property is approximately 4,000 pounds per acre of dry trimmed cannabis flower, although there can be no assurance that the property will yield this amount or any at all.

At the Closing, each outstanding share of common stock of Lemon Glow, of which there were 11,000 shares at the Effective Time of the Merger, were converted into the right to receive the Merger Consideration. The Company paid the Merger Consideration to the Lemon Glow Shareholders, paying the cash consideration, issuing the Notes, and issuing the restricting shares of Company common stock and Series B Stock.

At the Effective Time, all the property, rights, privileges, powers and franchises of Lemon Glow and Merger Sub vested in Lemon Glow as the surviving corporation, and all debts, liabilities, obligations, restrictions, disabilities and duties of Lemon Glow and Merger Sub became those of Lemon Glow as the surviving corporation. In addition, at the Effective Time, the Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws of Lemon Glow remained in place as the Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws of Lemon Glow as the surviving corporation.

At the Effective Time, each outstanding share of common stock of Merger Sub (100 shares) was converted into one share of common stock of Lemon Glow which became the only outstanding capital stock of the Lemon Glow at the Effective Time. In addition, each share of Lemon Glow common stock of the Company held in the treasury of Lemon Glow immediately prior to the Effective Time was canceled and retired. As a result, the Company became the sole owner of 100% of the issued and outstanding common stock of Lemon Glow.

In addition, at the Effective Time, the Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws of Lemon Glow remained in place as the Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws of Lemon Glow (as the surviving corporation). Also, at the Effective Time, the executive officers and directors of Lemon Glow remained in place as the executive officers and directors of Lemon Glow.

The Merger is intended to be a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), and the Merger Agreement is intended to be a “plan of reorganization” within the meaning of the regulations promulgated under Section 368(a) of the Code and for the purpose of qualifying as a tax-free transaction for federal income tax purposes.

ITEM 2 – MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

This discussion and analysis may include statements regarding our expectations with respect to our future performance, liquidity, and capital resources. Such statements, along with any other non-historical statements in the discussion, are forward-looking. These forward-looking statements are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, including, but not limited to, factors listed in other documents we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). We do not assume an obligation to update any forward- looking statement. Our actual results may differ materially from those contained in or implied by any of the forward-looking statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. See “SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS” above.

Sugarmade, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as ~~“we,”~~“we”, “us” or ~~“Company”~~“the/our Company”) ~~is a publicly-traded company~~was originally incorporated on June 5, 1986 in California as Lab, Inc., and later that month, on June 24, 1986 changed its name to Software Professionals, Inc. On May 21, 1996, the Company changed its name to Enlighten Software Solutions, Inc. On June 20, 2007, Enlighten Software Solutions, Inc. was incorporated in Delaware for the ~~state~~purpose of merging with Enlighten Softwear Solutions, Inc. a California Corporation so as to affect a redomicile to Delaware. ~~Our previous legal~~On January 24, 2008, the Company changed its name ~~was~~to Diversified Opportunities, Inc. On May 9, 2011 we closed on a Share Exchange Agreement with Sugarmade, Inc., a California corporation and on June 24, 2011 changed our name to Sugarmade, Inc.

Our Company, Sugarmade, Inc. operates ~~our~~much of its business activities through ~~multiple~~our subsidiaries, ~~which includes~~ SWC Group, Inc., a California corporation (“~~SWC”~~SWC’’), ~~SugarRush, Inc., a California corporation and~~ NUG Avenue, Inc., a California ~~corporation.~~corporation (“NUG Avenue”), and Lemon Glow Company, Inc., a California corporation (“Lemon Glow”). Sugarmade, Inc. was founded in 2010. In 2014, SWC, doing business as Carry Out Supplies, was acquired by Sugarmade, Inc., creating the Company as it is today.

Shares of our common stock are quoted on the OTC Markets, which is a quotation system for early-stage and developing companies. Our trading symbol is “SGMD”. Our corporate website is www.Sugarmade.com.

As of ~~March 31, 2021,~~the date of this filing, we ~~operated~~are involved in several business sectors and business ventures:

Paper and paper-based products: Supplying consumable products to the quick-service restaurant sub-sector of the restaurant industry, and as an importing and distributing non-medical personal protection equipment to business and consumers, via our ~~business in the following four segments:~~

Our legacy business operation, CarryOutSupplies.com, is a producer and wholesaler of custom printed and generic supplies, servicing more than 2,000 businesses in the Quick Service Restaurant Sector. Our products include double poly paper cups for cold beverage; disposable, clear, plastic cold cups, paper coffee cups, yogurt cups, ice cream cups, cup lids, cup sleeves, edible packaging, food containers, soup containers, plastic spoons, and ~~many other~~ similar products for this market sector. ~~CarryOutSupplies.com~~This subsidiary, which was ~~founded~~formed in ~~2009. Our products are viewable~~2009, was recently expanded to also offer non-medical personal protective equipment.

NUG Avenue, Inc. investment into licensed cannabis delivery in Los Angeles area markets. During February 2021, we became a majority owner of NUG Avenue, Inc., a California corporation (“NUG Avenue”), which operates a licensed and regulated cannabis delivery service out of Lynwood, California, serving the greater Los Angeles Metropolitan area (the “Lynwood Operations”). The Company currently owns a majority stake of seventy percent (70%) of NUG Avenue’s Lynwood Operations and holds first rights of refusal on ~~our website: www.CarryOutSupplies.com.~~

~~We believe we occupy a defensible space within~~NUG Avenue’s business expansion relative to the ~~Quick Service Restaurant Sector by~~cannabis marketplace. By way of our ~~significant experience in serving this customer base,~~capital injection made into NUG Avenue and by via our ~~knowledge~~70% ownership position, we consolidate and recognize 100% of the ~~industry fundamentals,~~revenues and our significant experience in Asia factory sourcing and importing goods from Asian factories. Our niche within the market pertains to serving the many quick-service restaurants that wish to acquire custom printed products, such as those embossed with logos, but the minimum order size70% of profits or losses generated by NUG Ave for such customization had been cost-prohibitive. With that in mind, CarryOutSupplies.com was founded to provide products to this underserved section of the market. Since that time, the Company has become a key supplier to more than 2,000 establishments, particularly within the frozen dessert segment.its Lynwood Operation.

The business of supplying such products to the quick-service restaurant sector remains highly competitive. Over the past few years, operating margins have compressed as a result of increased competition, the emergence of relatively inexpensive digital printing processes, and the larger printing and paper product manufacturers lowering minimum order quantities. Sugarmade expects the sector to remain highly competitive and is responding to the industry changes by realigning staff, eliminating less profitable products, and introducing new product areas.

The CarryOutSupplies operation has recently expanded its product offerings to include consumable sanitary supplies, such as non-medical gloves, non-medical facemasks, face shields, and other non-medical protective equipment. We believe our investment into NUG Avenue will allow us to expand our presence into the licensed and regulated cannabis marketplace. The California cannabis market continues its rapid growth, with the Southern California sub-market representing the world’s largest single cannabis marketplace. According to the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration, the most recently reported quarterly period posted a significant ~~experience~~increase in ~~sourcing~~cannabis tax compared to the year-ago period. Much of this growth was driven by increased use of delivery services, as consumers are increasingly relying on home delivery for many goods, including cannabis.

Cannabis products ~~from Asian factories~~delivery service and sales: As a joint owner in the ~~importation of goods from Asia makes us well-equipped to operate within~~Budcars licensed cannabis delivery service brand (“Budcars” or the ~~marketplace for non-medical, consumable, protective equipment.~~

~~We plan to continue our business pursuits relative to our CarryOutSuppies.com business, and have significantly restructured~~“Budcars Brand”). Budcars operates a licensed cannabis delivery service in the ~~operations over the past year. We plan to continue to modify our strategies and product lines to remain competitive in these niche market sectors.~~

InSacramento, California area. During early 2020, ~~our~~the Company entered into an agreement with Indigo Dye Group (“Indigo”) to ~~purchase Bud Cars, Inc.,~~acquire a ~~California corporation, which is engaged~~40% stake in the ~~licensed,~~Budcars Brand and ~~legal under California state law,~~in the Sacramento delivery ~~of cannabis and cannabis-containing products.~~operations. Under the terms of the ~~acquisition~~ agreement with Indigo, Sugarmade acquired ~~a 29% stake in the operation and~~ an option to ~~gain~~purchase an additional 30% interest in Budcars. Upon exercise of this option, the Company would acquire a controlling interest in Indigo. As of September 30, 2021, the ~~delivery service.~~

Cannabis is already one of the fastest-growing markets in the U.S. According to Fortune Business Insights, during 2019, the cannabis market produced approximately $100 billion in U.S. sales. Growth over the next few years is expected to top 32% compounded annually. The U.S. cannabis segmentoption has ~~clearly~~not yet been one of the fastest-growing markets within the American economy over the past 50 years. The California market clearly leads the U.S. market, with the legal California market worth at least $13 billion annually with strong growth continuing. The illegal market is likely even more extensive.

As the market shifts from the black to white markets, the legal providers are expected to benefit further. We urge investors to consider this trend in their investment decisions. One of the primary reasons many legal providers across several states have developed business issues is flawed state government policies that have allowed illegal operators to continue in business at the expense of the licensed and heavily taxed industry.

According to BDS Analytics and Arcview Market Research, two firms that closely monitor the cannabis marketplace, California’s total cannabis market is expected to produce about $12.8 billion this year, with $8.7 billion going to illicit operators and $3.1 billion to the state-authorized market.

For the first time, the white market/black market balance is beginning to shift as authorities crackdown on unlicensed business. This is starting to benefit legal operators. For example, California regulators and law enforcement agencies have recently announced hundreds of enforcement actions across California seizing millions of dollars of black market cannabis products. We believe this trend toward enforcement against illegal operators will directly benefit companies like the BudCars cannabis delivery service.

~~The outbreak of COVID-19, new social unrest in the United States,~~exercised and the ~~general movement toward retail home delivery have resulted~~Company’s stake in ~~radical shifts in the cannabis marketplace. As a result, the general market for delivery services is proliferating.~~Budcars was at 40%.

~~Budcars operates its delivery service in strict adherence to all state, local and municipal regulations and is fully licensed for operations by California regulators.~~

Starting on October 1, 2020, the Company plans to open new locations via purchasing equity in other ~~Brand/Franchises~~franchise brands to cover delivery for the entire California. Therefore, the Company is not likely at this time to exercise its option to acquire the additional 30% interest in Indigo. In addition, the Company is no longer involved in day-to-day operations of Indigo and going forward, the Company intends to pursue cannabis delivery independent of Indigo. As of October 1, 2020, the Company ceased to have control over the day-to-day business of Indigo and it was deconsolidated and recorded as an investment in nonconsolidated affiliate at its $505,449 estimated fair value and changed to equity method of accounting. AsPursuant to the terms of ~~March 31, 2021,~~the Indigo agreement, if the Company ~~still holds approximately 29% of the~~determines, in its discretion not to continue to make monthly payments, its 40% ownership ~~of Indigo. See Note 4 and Note 5.~~

~~Our Ownership~~interest in ~~Nug Avenue, Inc. Relative to Licensed and Permitted Cannabis Delivery in the Los Angeles Metropolitan Area~~

~~On February 8, 2020, Sugarmade became a joint owner of Nug Avenue, Inc., a California corporation (“Nug Avenue”), which is party to a management services agreement relating~~Indigo will be decreased according to the ~~licensed and regulated delivery of cannabis out of Lynwood, California, serving primarily the greater Los Angeles Metropolitan area (the “Lynwood Operations”).~~

payment then made. As of February 8, 2020, the Company acquired a majority stake of seventy percent (70%), allowing for full financial statement consolidation of the Nug Avenue, Inc. Lynwood Operations. As part of the February 8, 2020, agreement, the Company also gained an option to invest in Nug Avenue’s future business opportunities pertaining to any and all legal and regulated cannabis business operations. Further, under the February 8, 2002 agreement, Nug Avenue agreed to grant the Company unlimited participation rights in future financings.

The Company believes the Los Angeles cannabis delivery market offers substantial opportunities for growth. By all measures, the California cannabis market continues to gain strength, with the Southern California sub-market representing the world’s largest single cannabis marketplace. According to the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration, the most recently reported quarterly period posted an almost 80% increase in cannabis tax compared to the year-ago period. Much of this growth was driven by increased use of delivery services, as consumers are increasingly relying on home delivery for many goods, including cannabis.

~~Discussions with respect to our Company’s operations included those of, SWC and Indigo Dye Group Corp., a variable interest entity (“VIE”). During the quarter ended~~ December 31, 2020, the Company plans to open new locations via purchasing equity into other Brand/Franchises to cover delivery for the entire California. Therefore, the Company is not likely at this time to exercise its option to acquire themade $59,370 additional ~~30% interest in Indigo. In addition, the Company is no longer involved in Indigo’s day-to-day operations~~payments, and ~~going forward, the Company intends to pursue cannabis delivery, independent of Indigo. As of October 1, 2020, the Company continues to~~ hold approximately 29% of the ownership of Indigo but ceased to have a controlling interest in the partnership and it was deconsolidated and recorded as an investment in nonconsolidated affiliate at its $505,449 estimated fair value and changed to equity method of accounting. During the quarter ended December 31 ,2020, the Company invested additional $61,484 in Indigo, or 3.5% of Indigo’s issued shares. As of March 31, 2021, the Company continues to hold approximately 29%32% of the ownership of Indigo. As of ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2021, ~~we had no other operations other than CarryOutSupplies.com~~the Company recorded equity method investment in affiliates at $396,930, net with $44,477 loss from equity method investment.

hemp projects:On May ~~14,~~12, 2021, SugarMade, Inc. entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger, as amended (the “Merger Agreement”) by and between Lemon Glow Corporation, a California corporation (“Lemon Glow”), Carnaby Spot Bay Corp, a California corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company (“Merger Sub”), and Ryan Santiago (the “Shareholder Representative”), pursuant to which, on May 25, 2021 and upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement, Merger Sub merged with and into Lemon Glow, ~~Company (“Lemon Glow”), at which time the separate corporate existence of Merger Sub would cease (the “Merger”),~~ with Lemon Glow being the surviving corporation ~~in the Merger.~~

(the “Merger”). As ~~consideration for the Merger, at the closing~~a result of the Merger, ~~(the “Closing”) Company provided to the shareholders of~~ Lemon Glow ~~(the “Lemon Glow Shareholders”):~~

~~Lemon Glow is the owner of~~became a ~~640-acre property located in Lake Country, California. Lemon Glow is in the process of improving 32 acres~~wholly-owned subsidiary of the ~~640 acres~~Company. On October 28, 2021, the Company obtained a conditional Use Permit (UP) number from the Community Development Department of the County of Lake, California, which the Company believes is an important step towards the conditional Use Permit (UP) for ~~use as a regulated~~commercial cannabis cultivation ~~site. The Company and Lemon Glow expect that the annual potential cultivation yield~~ at ~~the property is approximately 4,000 pounds per acre of dry trimmed cannabis flower, although there can be no assurance that the property will yield this amount or any at all.~~its Property.

At the Closing, each outstanding share of common stock of Lemon Glow, of which there were 11,000 shares at the effective time of the Merger, were converted into the right to receive the Merger Consideration. Also at the Closing, each outstanding share of common stock of Merger Sub (100 shares) was converted into one share of common stock of Lemon Glow which became the only outstanding capital stock of the Lemon Glow at the effective time of the Merger. In addition, each share of Lemon Glow common stock of the Company held in the treasury of Lemon Glow immediately prior to the Closing was canceled and retired. As a result, the Company became the sole owner of 100% of the issued and outstanding common stock of Lemon Glow.

Our business and operating results for 2021 and 2020 ~~was~~were impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. However, we have seen improvement in our business, which we expect to continue throughout ~~2021.~~fiscal year of 2022.

The following table sets forth the results of our operations for the three months ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2021 and 2020.

	For the three months ended						For the three months ended
	March 31,						September 30,
	2021			2020			2021			2020

Net Sales	$	404,843		$	416,356		$	1,168,781		$	2,146,326
Cost of Goods Sold:		229,818			253,223			386,939			1,028,815
Gross profit		175,025			163,133			781,842			1,117,512
Operating Expenses		776,276			870,621			2,034,443			1,987,663
Loss from Operations		(601,251	)		(707,488	)		(1,252,601	)		(870,151	)
Other non-operating Expense:		(4,984,908	)		(1,423,624	)		(605,640	)		2,150,128
Equity Method Investment Loss		—			—			(44,477	)		—
Less: net income attributable to the noncontrolling interest		(48,756	)		—			(307,351	)		1,165
Net Loss	$	(5,537,403	)	$	(2,131,112	)	$	(1,595,367	)	$	1,278,812

For the three months ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2021 and 2020, revenues were ~~$404,843~~$1,168,781 and ~~$416,356,~~$2,146,326, respectively. The decrease was primarily due to the ~~COVID-19 pandemic.~~deconsolidation of Indigo Dye for the cannabis delivery services.

For the three months ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2021 and 2020, costs of goods sold were ~~$229,818~~$386,939 and ~~$253,223,~~$1,028,815, respectively. The decrease was primarily due to the ~~COVID-19 pandemic.~~deconsolidation of Indigo Dye for the cannabis delivery services.

For the three months ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2021 and 2020, gross profit was ~~$175,025~~$781,842 and ~~$163,133, respectively. The increase was primarily due to the higher margin for the cannabis delivery services.~~

~~For the three months ended March 31, 2021 and 2020, operating expenses were $776,276 and $870,621,~~$1,117,512, respectively. The decrease was primarily due to the ~~decrease in stock-based compensation.~~deconsolidation of Indigo Dye for the cannabis delivery services.

For the three months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020, operating expenses were $2,034,443 and $1,987,663, respectively.

The Company had total other non-operating expense of ~~$4,984,908~~$605,640 and ~~$1,423,624~~$2,150,128 income for the three months ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively. The increase in non-operating expense is related to the accounting for the changes in fair value of derivative ~~liabilities due to conversions.~~liabilities.

Net loss totaled ~~$5,537,403~~$1,595,367 for the three months ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2021, compared to a net ~~loss~~income of ~~$2,131,112~~$1,278,812 for the three-month period ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020. The ~~increase~~decrease was mainly due to the accounting for the changes in derivative liabilities due to conversions.

~~The following table sets forth the results of our operations for the nine months ended March 31, 2021 and 2020.~~

~~For the nine months ended March 31, 2021 and 2020, revenues were $2,851,822 and $1,891,140, respectively. The increase was primarily due to the new cannabis delivery business.~~

~~For the nine months ended March 31, 2021 and 2020, costs of goods sold were $1,502,247 and $1,181,081, respectively. The increase was primarily due to the new cannabis delivery business.~~

~~For the nine months ended March 31, 2021 and 2020, gross profit was $1,349,575 and $710,059, respectively. The increase was primarily due to the new cannabis delivery business.~~

~~For the nine months ended March 31, 2021 and 2020, operating expenses were $3,395,996 and $9,290,184, respectively. The decrease was due to the decrease in stock-based compensation.~~

The Company had total other non-operating expense of $3,912,812 and $3,333,060 for the nine months ended March 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. The increase in non-operating income is related to the accounting for the changes in derivative liabilities due to conversions.

Net loss totaled $5,912,591 for the nine months ended March 31, 2021, compared to a net loss of $11,913,186 for the nine-month period ended March 31, 2020. The decrease was mainly due to the decrease in stock-based compensation and the accounting for the changes in derivative liabilities due to conversions.

We have primarily financed our operations through the sale of unregistered equity and convertible notes payable. As of ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2021, our Company had cash balance of ~~$269,885,~~$239,500, current assets totaling ~~$2,550,469~~$2,783,452 and total assets of ~~$4,265,316.~~$18,741,650. We had current and total liabilities totaling ~~$9,553,200~~$8,428,166 and ~~$10,510,811,~~$14,412,671, respectively. ~~Stockholders’~~As of September 30, 2021, stockholders’ equity ~~reflected a deficiency of $6,245,495.~~totaled $4,328,979.

The following is a summary of cash provided by or used in each of the indicated types of activities during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2021 and 2020:

	2021			2020			2021			2020
Cash (used in) provided by:
Operating activities	$	(2,647,840	)	$	(2,509,064	)	$	(1,408,591	)	$	(1,429,333	)
Investing activities		(55,810	)		(700,000	)		(830,000	)		(38,594	)
Financing activities		2,532,530			3,182,202			1,081,147			1,708,015

Net cash used in operating activities was ~~$2,647,840~~$1,408,591 for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2021, and ~~$2,509,064~~$1,429,333 for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020. The decrease was attributable to the change in accounts receivable, prepayments, and other payables.

Net cash used in investing activities was ~~$55,810~~$830,000 for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2021, and ~~$700,000~~$38,594 for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020. The increase was attributable to purchase of property at 5058 Valley Blvd, Los Angeles, CA90032 in total purchase amount of $830,000.

Net cash provided by financing activities was ~~$2,532,530~~$1,081,147 for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2021 and ~~$3,182,202~~$1,708,015 for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020. The decrease in cash inflow in 2021 was mainly due to the repayments to notes payables and decreased proceeds from convertible notes.

Our capital requirements going forward will consist of financing our operations until we are able to reach a level of revenues and gross margins adequate to equal or exceed our ongoing operating expenses. Other than the notes payable discussed above, borrowings from our bank and the production credit facility with our suppliers, we do not have any credit agreement or source of liquidity immediately available to us.

Given estimates of our Company’s future operating results and our credit arrangements with our suppliers, we are currently forecasting that we will need to secure additional financing to obtain adequate financial resources to reach profitability. As of ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2021, we estimate that the cash necessary to implement our current business plan for the next twelve months is approximately $2,000,000.

Based on our need to raise additional funds to implement our business plans for the next twelve months, we have included a discussion concerning the presentation of our financial statements on a going concern basis in the notes to our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and our independent public accountants have included a similar discussion in their opinion on our financial statements through June 30, ~~2020.~~2021. We will be required in the near future to issue debt or sell our Company’s equity securities in order to raise additional cash, although there are no firm arrangements in place for any such financing at this time. We cannot provide any assurances as to whether we will be able to secure the necessary financing, or the terms of any such financing transaction if one were to occur. The failure to secure such financing could severely curtail our plans for future growth or in more severe scenarios, the continued operations of our Company.

Our current plans do not call for our Company to expend significant amounts for capital expenditures for the foreseeable future beyond relatively insignificant expenditures for office furniture and information technology related equipment as we add employees to our Company. We are however continually evaluating the production processes of our third-party contract manufacturers to determine if there are investments we could make in their processes to achieve manufacturing improvements and significant cost savings. Any such desired investments would require additional cash above our current forecast requirements.

These interim unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with our Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, ~~2020,~~2021, which contains our audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto, together with the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation, for the fiscal year ended June 30, ~~2020.~~2021. The interim results for the period ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2021 are not necessarily indicative of the results for the full fiscal year.

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of our Company, its ~~wholly~~wholly-owned subsidiaries, SWC Group, Inc., a California corporation (“SWC’’), Lemon Glow Company, Inc., a California corporation (“Lemon Glow”), and its majority owned subsidiary, ~~SWC Group~~NUG Avenue, Inc., a California corporation (“Nug Avenue”), and Indigo Dye Group Corp., an investment in nonconsolidated affiliate (formerly a variable interest entity as of September 30, 2020). All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.

Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that we will continue as a going concern. Such assumption contemplates the realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. These consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and classifications of liabilities that may result should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

Management is endeavoring to increase revenue-generating operations. While priority is on generating cash from operations through the sale of the Company’s products, management is also seeking to raise additional working capital through various financing sources, including the sale of the Company’s equity and/or debt securities, which may not be available on commercially reasonable terms to our Company, or which may not be available at all. If such financing is not available on satisfactory terms, we may be unable to continue our business as desired and our operating results will be adversely affected. In addition, any financing arrangement may have potentially adverse effects on us and/or our stockholders. Debt financing (if available and undertaken) will increase expenses, must be repaid regardless of operating results and may involve restrictions limiting our operating flexibility. If we issue equity securities to raise additional funds, the percentage ownership of our existing stockholders will be reduced, and the new equity securities may have rights, preferences or privileges senior to those of the current holders of our common stock.

Substantially all of the Company’s revenue is recognized at the time control of the products transfers to the customer.

Property and equipment ~~are~~is stated at the historical cost, less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation on property and equipment is provided using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets for both financial and income tax reporting purposes as follows:

The Company reviews the carrying value of property, plant, and equipment for impairment whenever events and circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable from the estimated future cash flows expected to result from its use and eventual disposition. In cases where undiscounted expected future cash flows are less than the carrying value, an impairment loss is recognized equal to an amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair value of assets. The factors considered by management in performing this assessment include current operating results, trends and prospects, the manner in which the property is used, and the effects of obsolescence, demand, competition and other economic factors. Based on this assessment, no impairment expenses for property, plant, and equipment was recorded in operating expenses during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2021 and 2020.

Recoverability of long-lived assets to be held and used is measured by comparing the carrying amount of an asset to the estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated undiscounted future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized by the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the assets. Fair value is generally determined using the asset’s expected future discounted cash flows or market value, if readily determinable. Based on its review, ~~the Company,~~there was $0 and $43,800 impairment loss of its long-lived assets as of September 30, 2021 and June 30, 2020, performed an impairment test of all of its intangible assets. Based on the Company’s analysis, the company had an amortization of intangible assets of $1,022 and $1,050 for the nine months ended March 31, 2021, ~~and 2020,~~ respectively.

Goodwill is the ~~new adoption, $1,105,755~~excess of ~~operating lease right-of-use asset~~the purchase price over the fair value of identifiable net assets acquired in business combinations accounted for under the acquisition method. Intangible assets represent purchased intangible assets including developed technology and ~~$1,140,041~~in-process research and development, technologies acquired or licensed from other companies, customer relationships, non-compete covenants, backlog, and trademarks and tradenames. Purchased finite-lived intangible assets are capitalized and amortized over their estimated useful lives. Technologies acquired or licensed from other companies, customer relationships, non-compete covenants, backlog, and trademarks and tradenames are capitalized and amortized over the lesser of ~~operating lease liabilities were reflected on~~ the ~~Company’s June 30, 2020 financial statements and $786,817~~terms of ~~operating lease right-of-use asset and $822,420~~the agreement, or estimated useful life. We capitalize cannabis cultivation license acquired as part of ~~operating lease liabilities were reflected on the Company’s March 31, 2021 financial statements.~~a business combination.

Stock based compensation cost to employees is measured at the date of grant, based on the calculated fair value of the stock-based award, and will be recognized as expense over the employee’s requisite service period (generally the vesting period of the award). We estimate the fair value of employee stock options granted using the Binomial Option Pricing Model. Key assumptions used to estimate the fair value of stock options will include the exercise price of the award, the fair value of our common stock on the date of grant, the expected option term, the ~~risk free~~risk-free interest rate at the date of grant, the expected volatility and the expected annual dividend yield on our common stock. We use our company’s own data among other information to estimate the expected price volatility and the expected forfeiture rate. Share-based compensation awards issued to non-employees for services rendered are recorded at either the fair value of the services rendered or the fair value of the share-based payment, whichever is more readily determinable.

Level 1 -– observable inputs that reflect quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.

Level 2 -– include other inputs that are directly or indirectly observable in the marketplace.

Level 3 -– unobservable inputs which are supported by little or no market activity.

The Company used Level 3 inputs for its valuation methodology for the derivative liabilities in determining the fair value using the Binomial option-pricing model for the ~~six~~three months ended ~~December 31, 2020.~~September 30, 2021.

The Company’s financial statements ~~as of December 31, 2020~~reflect that substantially all of its operations are conducted in three industry segments – (1) paper and paper-based products such as paper cups, cup lids, food containers, etc., which accounts ~~for approximately 24%~~approx. 38% of the Company’s revenues; (2) ~~non-medical supplies such as non-medical fascial mask,~~Cannabis products delivery service and sales, which accounts ~~for approximately 3%~~approx. 62% of the Company’s total ~~revenues; and cannabis products delivery service and sales.~~revenues.

In January 2020, the FASB issued ASU No. 2020-01, Investments -– Equity Securities (Topic 321), Investments -– Equity Method and Joint Ventures (Topic 323), and Derivative and Hedging (Topic 815), which clarifies the interaction of rules for equity securities, the equity method of accounting, and forward contracts and purchase options on certain types of securities. The guidance clarifies how to account for the transition into and out of the equity method of accounting when considering observable transactions under the measurement alternative. The ASU is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2020, including interim reporting periods within those annual periods, with early adoption permitted. WeThe Company have adopted this ASU on the consolidated financial statements in the year ended June 30, 2021. The adoption had no material impact on the consolidated financial statements in the year ended June 30, 2021 and three months ended September 30, 2021.

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, and not absolute, assurance of achieving the desired control objectives. In reaching a reasonable level of assurance, management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives.

As required by the SEC Rule ~~13a-15(e)~~13a-15€ and Rule 15d-15(e), we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision of and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on the foregoing, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that as of March 31, 2021, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective because the Company is relatively inexperienced with certain complexities within U.S. GAAP and SEC reporting.

We have taken, and are continuing to take, certain actions to remediate the material weakness related to our lack of U.S. GAAP experience. We plan to hire additional credentialed professional staff and consulting professionals with greater knowledge and experience of U.S. GAAP and related regulatory requirements to oversee our financial reporting process in order to ensure our compliance with U.S. GAAP and other relevant securities laws. In addition, we plan to provide additional training to our accounting personnel on U.S. GAAP, and other regulatory requirements regarding the preparation of financial statements.

Notwithstanding the above identified material weakness, the Company’s management believes that its unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included in this report fairly present in all material respects the Company’s financial condition, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented and that this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

There have not been any changes in our internal controls over financial reporting during the quarter ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2021 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

From time to time and in the course of business, we may become involved in various legal proceedings seeking monetary damages and other relief. The amount of the ultimate liability, if any, from such claims cannot be determined. Except as set forth below, as of ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2021, there were no legal claims pending or threatened against the Company that in the opinion of our management would be likely to have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

On December 11, 2013, the Company was served with a complaint from two convertible note holders and investors in the Company. On February 21, 2017, the Company signed a settlement agreement with the plaintiffs in the matter of Hannan vs. Sugarmade. Under the terms of the settlement agreement, the Company agreed to pay the plaintiffs an aggregate of $227,000 to settle all claims against the Company, which included the payoff of two notes outstanding. The parties estimated the value of the notes at approximately $80,000. As of June 30, 2020, third parties had purchased two notes of approximately $80,000. As of ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2021, there remains a balance, plus accrued interest on the $227,000 and on the $80,000 due under the notes.

During the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2021, the Company issued the following shares:

All of the aforementioned securities were issued pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Rule 506 thereunder.

During the three months ended September 30, 2021, the Company’ Tier 2 Regulation A Offering has been completed and was fully subscribed:

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Delaware		94-3008888
(State or other jurisdiction of		(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)		Identification No.)

750 Royal Oaks Dr., Suite 108, Monrovia, CA		91016
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

Title of each class		Trading Symbol(s)		Name of each exchange on which registered
N/A		N/A		N/A

Large accelerated filer	~~[ ]~~☐	Accelerated filer	~~[ ]~~☐
Non-accelerated filer	~~[X]~~☒	Smaller reporting company	~~[X]~~☒
		Emerging growth company	~~[ ]~~☐

PART I:	Financial Information

Item 1	Financial Statements	1
	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2021 (unaudited) and June 30, ~~2020~~2021 (audited)	1
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for Three ~~and Nine~~ Months Ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2021 and 2020 (unaudited)	2
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Equity for the Three ~~and Nine~~ Months Ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2021 and 2020 (unaudited)	3
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the ~~Nine~~Three Months Ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2021 and 2020 (unaudited)	4
	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)	5
Item 2	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	3027
Item 3	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	3935
Item 4	Controls and Procedures	3935

PART II:	Other Information

Item 1	Legal Proceedings	4036
Item 1A	Risk Factors	4036
Item 2	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	4036
Item 3	Defaults upon Senior Securities	4036
Item 4	Mine Safety Disclosures	4036
Item 5	Other Information	4036
Item 6	Exhibits	4136

Signatures	4237

	September 30, 2021			September 30, 2020
	For the Three Months Ended
	September 30, 2021			September 30, 2020
Revenues, net	$	1,168,781		$	2,146,326
Cost of goods sold		386,939			1,028,815
Gross profit		781,842			1,117,512

Selling, general and administrative expenses		613,139			602,805
Advertising and promotion expense		513,467			277,806
Marketing and research expense		35,413			222,348
Professional expense		310,500			503,430
Salaries and wages		460,424			362,524
Stock compensation expense		101,500			18,750
Total operating expenses		2,034,443			1,987,663

Loss from operations		(1,252,601	)		(870,151	)

Non-operating income (expense):
Other (expense) income		(4,994	)		(51,299	)
Interest expense		(157,911	)		(466,774	)
Bad debts		-			(3,517	)
Change in fair value of derivative liabilities		325,234			3,495,147
Warrant expense		8,289			66,126
Loss on settlement		-			(75,000	)
Gain on asset disposal		(28	)		-
Amortization of debt discount		(132,579	)		(814,545	)
Amortization of intangible assets		(1,533	)		-
Unrealized gain (loss) on securities		(642,117	)		-
Total non-operating expenses, net		(605,640	)		2,150,128
Equity Method Investment Loss		(44,477	)		-
Net loss	$	(1,902,718	)	$	1,279,977

Less: net loss attributable to the noncontrolling interest	$	(307,351	)	$	1,165
Net loss attributable to SugarMade Inc.	$	(1,595,367	)	$	1,278,812

Basic net loss per share	$	(0.00	)	$	(0.00	)
Diluted net loss per share	$	(0.00	)	$	(0.00	)

Basic and diluted weighted average common shares outstanding *		4,740,034,036			2,422,975,968

	For the Three Months Ended						For the Nine Months Ended
	March 31, 2021			March 31, 2020			March 31, 2021			March 31, 2020
Revenues, net	$	404,843		$	416,356		$	2,851,822		$	1,891,140
Cost of goods sold		229,818			253,223			1,502,247			1,181,081
Gross profit		175,025			163,133			1,349,575			710,059

Selling, general and administrative expenses		300,188			361,986			1,446,038			1,057,706
Advertising and promotion expense		99,481			15,045			378,068			72,528
Marketing and research expense		48,324			70,185			364,580			149,631
Professional expense		137,399			268,530			756,444			1,415,796
Salaries and wages		174,634			109,625			368,616			343,723
Stock compensation expense		16,250			45,250			82,250			6,250,800
Loss from operations		(601,251	)		(707,488	)		(2,046,421	)		(8,580,125	)

Non-operating income (expense):
Other income		1,957			145			5,099			3,243
Gain in loss of control of VIE		-			-			313,928			-
Interest expense		(725,688	)		(173,519	)		(1,920,660	)		(1,493,319	)
Bad debts		(256	)		-			(133,235	)		-
Change in fair value of derivative liabilities		(3,485,549	)		(238,065	)		506,559			2,075,982
Warrant Expense		(14,694	)		(25,369	)		55,695			(80,647	)
Loss on notes conversion		-			-			-			(184,626	)
Loss on settlement		-			-			(80,000	)		(382,635	)
Gain on asset disposal		-			-			-			7,000
Amortization of debt discount		(759,219	)		(961,146	)		(2,605,144	)		(3,079,553	)
Debt forgiveness		-			(25,670	)		-			(197,765	)
Other expenses		(1,459	)		-			(55,054	)		(740	)
Total non-operating expenses, net		(4,984,908	)		(1,423,624	)		(3,912,812	)		(3,333,060	)
Equity Method Investment Loss								(2,114	)
Net loss	$	(5,586,159	)	$	(2,131,112	)	$	(5,961,347	)	$	(11,913,186	)

Less: net loss attributable to the noncontrolling interest	$	(48,756	)	$	-		$	(48,756	)	$	-
Net loss attributable to SugarMade Inc.	$	(5,537,403	)	$	(2,131,112	)	$	(5,912,591	)	$	(11,913,186	)

Basic net loss per share	$	(0.00	)	$	(0.00	)	$	(0.00	)	$	(0.01	)
Diluted net loss per share	$	(0.00	)	$	(0.00	)	$	(0.00	)	$	(0.01	)

Basic and diluted weighted average common shares outstanding *		4,121,621,837			822,263,706			3,247,070,176			863,368,325

	Shares		Amount		Shares		Amount		Shares		Amount		capital		shares			CS			Subscribed			deficit			Interest			Equity
	Preferred Stock - Series B				Preferred Stock - Series C				Common stock				Additional paid-in		Shares to be issued, common			Subscription Receivable -			Common Shares			Accumulated			Non Controlling			Total Shareholders’
	Shares		Amount		Shares		Amount		Shares		Amount		capital		shares			CS			Subscribed			deficit			Interest			Equity

Balance at June 30, 2021		541,500	$	542		1	$	-		7,402,535,677	$	7,402,536	$	64,841,655		5,600,000		$	(500,000	)	$	1,889,608		$	(74,364,466	)	$	(99,656	)	$	4,770,218
Reclass derivative liability to equity from conversion		-		-		-		-		-		-		576,214		-			-			-			-			-			576,214
Shares issued for conversions		-		-		-		-		375,600,448		375,600		9,665		-			-			-			-			-			385,266
Shares issued for acquisition		2,000,000		2,000		-		-		660,571,429		660,571		6,787,029		(5,600,000	)		-			(1,849,600	)		-			-			-
Shares issued for subscription receivable - common stock		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-			500,000			-			-			-			500,000
Repayment of capital to noncontrolling minority
Net loss		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-			-			-			(1,595,367	)		(307,351	)		(1,902,718	)
Balance at September 30, 2021		2,541,500	$	2,542		1	$	-		8,438,707,554	$	8,438,707	$	72,214,564	$	-		$	-		$	40,008		$	(75,959,833	)	$	(407,007	)	$	4,328,979

	Preferred Stock						Common Stock						Additional Paid-in			Shares to be Cancelled, Preferred			Shares to be Cancelled, Common			Common Shares			Accumulated			Total Shareholders’
	Shares			Amount			Shares			Amount			Capital			Shares			Shares			Subscribed			Deficit			Equity

Balance at June 30, 2019		2,000,000			2,000			697,608,570			697,610			61,038,875			-			-			29,000			(47,088,950	)		14,678,534
Shares issued for debt settlement		-			-			1,000,000			1,000			28,000			-			-			(29,000	)		-			-
Reclass derivative liability from conversion		-			-			-			-			659,526			-			-			-			-			659,526
Shares issued for conversions		-			-			71,915,557			71,916			475,917			-			-			-			-			547,833
Shares issued for cash		-			-			11,348,591			11,349			88,651			-			-			-			-			100,000
Shares issued for warrant exercise		-			-			28,371,818			28,382			(14,249	)		-			-			-			-			14,133
Net loss		-			-			-			-			-			-			-			-			(2,027,551	)		(2,027,551	)
Balance at September 30, 2019		2,000,000			2,000			810,244,536			810,257			62,276,720			-			-			-			(49,116,501	)		13,972,474
Shares issued for cash		-			-			26,621,610			26,622			213,378			-			-			100,000			-			340,000
Options issued for services		-			-			-			-			73,500			-			-			-			-			73,500
Shares issued as compensation for services		415,000			415			500,000			500			5,941,135			-			-			-			-			5,942,050
Reclass derivative liability from conversion		-			-			-			-			297,962			-			-			-			-			297,962
Shares issued for conversion		-			-			24,994,341			24,994			117,170			-			-			-			-			142,164
Shares issued for debt settlement		-			-			18,181,818			18,182			272,273			-			-			-			-			290,455
Shares issued for award - Bizright		750,001			750			249,373,817			249,374			14,040,936			(10,725,014)			(21,566,046	)		-			-			(18,000,000	)
Initial valuation of BCF		-			-			-			-			239,301			-			-			-			-			239,301
Net loss		-			-			-			-			-			-			-			-			(7,754,524	)		(7,754,524	)
Balance at December 31, 2019		3,165,001			3,165			1,129,916,122			1,129,927			83,472,375			(10,725,014	)		(21,566,046	)		100,000			(56,871,025	)		(4,456,619	)
Shares issued for cash		-			-			33,542,865			33,543			191,457			-			-			(100,000	)		-			125,000
Options issued for services		-			-			-			-			45,250			-			-			-			-			45,250
Reclass derivative liability from conversion		-			-			-			-			302,845			-			-			-			-			302,845
Shares issued for conversions		-			-			128,525,706			128,526			170,230			-			-			-			-			298,756
Shares cancelled for award - Bizright		(750,001	)		(750	)		(448,873,817	)		(448,874	)		(31,827,478	)		10,725,014			21,566,046			-			-			13,958
Initial valuation of BCF		-			-			-			-			210,000			-			-			-			-			210,000
Net loss		-			-			-			-			-			-			-			-			(2,131,111	)		(2,131,111	)
Balance at March 31, 2020		2,415,000			2,415			843,110,876			843,120			52,564,680			-			-			-			(59,002,136	)		(5,591,920	)

	1)	~~Paper and paper-based products:~~ The supply of consumable products to the quick-service restaurant sub-sector of the restaurant industry, and as an importer and distributor of non-medical personal protection equipment to business and consumers, via our CarryOutSupplies.com subsidiary (“Carryout Supplies”). Carryout Supplies is a producer and wholesaler of custom printed and generic supplies, servicing more than 2,000 quick-service restaurants. The primary products are plastic cold cups, paper coffee cups, yogurt cups, ice cream cups, cup lids, cup sleeves, edible packaging, food containers, soup containers, plastic spoons, and similar products for this market sector. This subsidiary, which was formed in 2009, was recently expanded to also offer non-medical personal protective equipment.

	2)	~~Nug Avenue, Inc. investment into licensed cannabis delivery in Los Angeles area markets.~~ During February 2021, we became a majority owner of Nug Avenue, Inc., a California corporation (“Nug Avenue”), which operates a licensed and regulated cannabis delivery service out of Lynwood, California, serving the greater Los Angeles Metropolitan area (the “Lynwood Operations”). The Company currently owns a majority stake of seventy percent (70%) of Nug Avenue’s Lynwood Operations and holds first rights of refusal on Nug Avenue’s business expansion relative to the cannabis marketplace. By way of our capital injection made into Nug Avenue and by via our 70% ownership position, we consolidate and recognize 100% of the revenues and 70% of profits or loss generated by Nug Ave for its Lynwood Operation. We believe our investment into Nug Avenue will allow us to expand out presence into the licensed and regulated cannabis marketplace. The California cannabis market continues its rapid growth, with the Southern California sub-market representing the world’s largest single cannabis marketplace. According to the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration, the most recently reported quarterly period posted a significant increase in cannabis tax compared to the year-ago period. Much of this growth was driven by increased use of delivery services, as consumers are increasingly relying on home delivery for many goods, including cannabis.

	3)	~~Cannabis products delivery service and sales:~~ As a joint owner in the Budcars licensed cannabis delivery service brand (“Budcars” or the “Budcars Brand”). Budcars operates a licensed cannabis delivery service in the Sacramento, California area. During early 2020, the Company gained a 40% stake in the Budcars Brand and in the Sacramento delivery operations via acquiring a 40% stake in Indigo Dye Group (“Indigo”). Under the terms of the agreement with Indigo, Sugarmade acquired an option to purchase an additional 30% interest in Budcars. Upon exercise of this option, the Company would acquire a controlling interest in Indigo. As of March 31, 2021, the option has not yet been exercised and the Company’s stake in Budcars was at 40%. Starting on October 1, 2020, the Company plans to open new locations via purchasing equity in other Brand/Franchises to cover delivery for the entire California. Therefore, the Company is not likely at this time to exercise its option to acquire the additional 30% interest in Indigo. In addition, the Company is no longer involved in day-to-day operations of Indigo and going forward, the Company intends to pursue cannabis delivery independent of Indigo. As of October 1, 2020, the Company ceased to have control over the day-to-day business of Indigo and it was deconsolidated and recorded as an investment in nonconsolidated affiliate at its $505,449 estimated fair value and changed to equity method of accounting. Pursuant to the terms of the Indigo agreement, if the Company determines, in its discretion not to continue to make monthly payments, its 40% ownership interest in Indigo will be decreased according to the payment then made. As of March 31, 2021, the Company made no additional payments, and still hold approximately 29% of the ownership of Indigo. See Note 4 and Note 5.

	4)	Selected cannabis and hemp projects. We are also seeking operating contracts and investments in various legal, licensed and regulated cannabis and hemp projects via our Sugar Rush, Inc. subsidiary and directly from Sugarmade, Inc. We believe our team has strong experience in hemp and cannabis operations and management that can be leveraged to expand our revenue base. On March 28, 2021 we entered into a binding letter of intent for the acquisition of Lemon Glow Company, Inc., a California corporation (“Lemon Glow”), including all of Lemon Glow’s assets, interests, property, and rights, which includes six-hundred-forty (640) acres of real estate in Lake County, California, outside of the local commercial cannabis cultivation exclusion zones. Our intent, via the Sugar Rush subsidiary, is to utilize thirty-two acres of the property to develop licensed cannabis cultivation and manufacturing operations. On April 27, 2021, we entered into an amendment to the March 28, 2021 letter of intent extending the term of the letter of intent to May 12, 2021. On May 14, 2021, the Company issued a press release announcing the Closing of the Merger. The Closing of the Merger occurred in accordance with the terms of the Merger Agreement on May 12, 2021. See subsequent events – Agreement and plan of merger.

Machinery and equipment	~~3-5~~3-5 years
Furniture and equipment	7 years
Vehicles	5 years
Leasehold improvements	530 years
Building	31.5 years


	Three months ended
	September 30, 2021		September 30, 2020
Segment operating income
Paper and paper-based products	$	438,543	$	574,970
Cannabis products delivery		730,237		1,571,356
Total operating income	$	1,168,781	$	2,146,326

	For the periods ended
	March 31, 2021		June 30, 2020
Prepaid Deposit	$	90,696	$	48,483
Prepaid Inventory		961,975		65,449
Employees Advance		—		324
Prepaid Expenses		9,717		35,157
Undeposited Funds		4,209		71,550
Other		—		42,441
Total:	$	1,066,597	$	263,404

	September 30, 2021		June 30, 2021
Accounts payable	$	1,569,139	$	1,464,692
Accrued liabilities		354,213		310,528
Contingent liabilities		262,077		283,619
Total accounts payable and accrued liabilities:	$	2,185,429	$	2,058,839

	June 30, 2021
Annual Dividend Yield	—
Expected Life (Years)	0.50-3.00
Risk-Free Interest Rate	0.01-0.46	%
Expected Volatility	89-236	%

	~~March 31,~~September 30, 2021
Annual ~~dividend yield~~Dividend Yield	—
Expected ~~life (years)~~Life (Years)	~~0.2-1.00~~0.50-3.00
~~Risk-free interest rate~~Risk-Free Interest Rate	~~0.01-0.19~~0.05-0.53	%
Expected ~~volatility~~Volatility	~~115-209~~127-234	%

	~~June 30, 2020~~
~~Annual dividend yield~~	—
~~Expected life (years)~~	~~0.5-1.00~~
~~Risk-free interest rate~~	~~0.16-2.10~~	%
~~Expected volatility~~	~~113-175~~	%

Beginning Balance, June 30, 2020	$	5,597,095
Additions		2,996,017
Cancellation of Derivative Liabilities Due to Cash Repayment		(1,300,107	)
Cancellation of Derivative liabilities Due to Share Reservation		(214,757	)
Mark to Market		(278,070	)
Reclassification to APIC due to conversions		(4,076,280	)
Ending Balance, March 31, 2021	$	2,723,899


Beginning Balance, June 30, 2021	$	2,217,361
Additions	$	—
Mark to Market	$	(325,234	)
Cancellation of Derivative Liabilities Due to Cash Repayment	$	—
Reclassification to APIC Due to Conversions	$	(576,214	)
Ending Balance, September 30, 2021		1,315,913

Beginning Balance, June 30, 2019	$	2,991,953
Additions		3,999,033
Mark to Market		(2,075,982	)
Reclassification to APIC due to conversions		(1,260,333	)
Ending Balance, March 31, 2020	$	3,706,809

Nine Months Ended
March 31, 2021
Lease Cost
Operating lease cost (included in general and administration in the Company’s unaudited condensed statement of operations)	$	231,694

Other Information
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities for the nine months ended March 31, 2021	$	163,170
Remaining lease term – operating leases (in years)		3.00
Average discount rate – operating leases		10	%
The supplemental balance sheet information related to leases for the periods are as follows:

Operating leases
Short-term right-of-use assets	$	237,555
Long-term right-of-use assets	$	549,262
Total operating lease assets	$	786,817

Short-term operating lease liabilities	$	231,305
Long-term operating lease liabilities	$	591,115
Total operating lease liabilities	$	822,420

Three Months Ended
September 30, 2021
Lease Cost
Operating lease cost (included in general and administration in the Company’s unaudited condensed statement of operations)	$	77,231

Other Information
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities for the three months ended September 30, 2021	$	58,639
Remaining lease term – operating leases (in years)		2.5
Average discount rate – operating leases		10	%
The supplemental balance sheet information related to leases for the periods are as follows:

Operating leases
Short-term right-of-use assets	$	249,464
Long-term right-of-use assets	$	421,557
Total operating lease assets	$	671,021

Short-term operating lease liabilities	$	246,682
Long-term operating lease liabilities	$	456,755
Total operating lease liabilities	$	703,437

	~~(a)~~	~~$280,000 in cash; and~~
	~~(b)~~	$3,976,000 via the issuance of promissory notes to Lemon Glow Shareholders, which each bear interest at the rate of 5% per year 36 monthly payments commencing on June 15, 2021 (each, a “Note” and collectively the “Notes”); and

	~~(ii)~~	~~660,571,429 shares of common stock of the Company, par value $0.001 (the “Company Common Stock”); and~~
	~~(iii)~~	~~2,000,000 shares of Series B Preferred Stock of the Company (the “Series B Stock”).~~

	1)	~~Paper and paper-based products:~~ The supply of consumable products to the quick-service restaurant sub-sector of the restaurant industry, and as an importer and distributor of non-medical personal protection equipment to business and consumers, via our CarryOutSupplies.com subsidiary (“Carryout Supplies”). CarryoutCarry Out Supplies subsidiary. Carry Out Supplies is a producer and wholesaler of custom printed and generic supplies, servicing more than 2,000 quick-service restaurants. The primary products are plastic cold cups, paper coffee cups, yogurt cups, ice cream cups, cup lids, cup sleeves, edible packaging, food containers, soup containers, plastic spoons, and similar products for this market sector. This subsidiary, which was formed in 2009, was recently expanded to also offer non-medical personal protective equipment.

	2)	~~Non-medical supplies:~~ ~~Beginning in 2020, we sell non-medical personal protective equipment through Carryout Supplies.~~

	3)	~~Cannabis products delivery service and sales:~~ As a joint owner in the Budcars licensed cannabis delivery service brand (“Budcars” or the “Budcars Brand”). Budcars operates a licensed cannabis delivery service in the Sacramento, California area. During early 2020, the Company gained a 40% stake in the Budcars Brand and in the Sacramento delivery operations via acquiring a 40% stake in Indigo Dye Group (“Indigo”). Under the terms of the agreement with Indigo, Sugarmade acquired an option to purchase an additional 30% interest in Budcars. Upon exercise of this option, the Company would acquire a controlling interest in Indigo. As of December 31, 2020, the option has not yet been exercised and the Company’s stake in Budcars was at 40%. Starting on October 1, 2020, the Company plans to open new locations via purchasing equity in other Brand/Franchises to cover delivery for the entire California. Therefore, the Company is not likely at this time to exercise its option to acquire the additional 30% interest in Indigo. In addition, the Company is no longer involved in day-to-day operations of Indigo and going forward, the Company intends to pursue cannabis delivery independent of Indigo. Starting on October 1, 2020, the Company plans to open new locations via purchasing equity in other Brand/Franchises to cover delivery for the entire California. Therefore, the Company is not likely at this time to exercise its option to acquire the additional 30% interest in Indigo. In addition, the Company is no longer involved in day-to-day operations of Indigo and going forward, the Company intends to pursue cannabis delivery independent of Indigo. As of October 1, 2020, the Company ceased to have control over the day-to-day business of Indigo and it was deconsolidated and recorded as an investment in nonconsolidated affiliate at its $505,449 estimated fair value and changed to equity method of accounting. Pursuant to the terms of the Indigo agreement, if the Company determines, in its discretion not to continue to make monthly payments, its 40% ownership interest in Indigo will be decreased according to the payment then made. During the quarter ended December 31 ,2020, if the Company makes no additional payments, it will hold approximately 29% of the ownership of Indigo. See Note 4 and Note 5.

	4)	Starting on February 8, 2021, Sugarmade became a joint owner of Nug Avenue, Inc., a California corporation (“Nug Avenue”), which operates a licensed and regulated cannabis delivery service out of Lynwood, California, serving the greater Los Angeles Metropolitan area (the “Lynwood Operations”). The Company currently owns a majority stake of seventy percent (70%) of Nug Avenue’s Lynwood Operations and holds first rights of refusal on Nug Avenue’s business expansion relative to the cannabis marketplace.

	~~(c)~~	~~$280,000 in cash; and~~
	~~(d)~~	$3,976,000 via the issuance of promissory notes to Lemon Glow Shareholders, which each bear interest at the rate of 5% per year 36 monthly payments commencing on June 15, 2021 (each, a “Note” and collectively the “Notes”); and

	~~(v)~~	~~660,571,429 shares of common stock of the Company; and~~
	~~(vi)~~	~~2,000,000 shares of Series B Preferred Stock of the Company (the “Series B Stock”).~~

Machinery and equipment	3-5 years
Furniture and equipment	7 years
Vehicles	5 years
Leasehold improvements	530 years
Building	31.5 years

	●	~~587,222,222~~660,571,429 shares of common stock for ~~cash~~Lemon Glow acquisition in total fair value of ~~$1,012,000.~~$1,849,600.

	●	~~15,000,000~~2,000,000 shares of ~~common~~series B preferred stock for ~~services~~Lemon Glow acquisition in total fair value of ~~$37,500.~~$5,600,000.

Exhibit No.		Description
31.1*		Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.1**		Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

101.INS*		Inline XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH*		Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema

101.CAL*		Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase

101.DEF*		Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase

101.LAB*		Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase

101.PRE*		Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase

101.INS*104		Cover Page Interactive Data File (embedded within the Inline XBRL ~~Instance Document~~

101.SCH*		~~XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema~~

101.CAL*		~~XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase~~

101.DEF*		~~XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase~~

101.LAB*		~~XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase~~

101.PRE*		~~XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase~~document)

	Sugarmade, Inc.

~~May 19,~~November 22, 2021	By:	/s/ Jimmy Chan
		Jimmy Chan
		Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer)