UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
 _________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________ 
FORM 10-Q
 _________________________________________________________  
xQUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended SeptemberJune 30, 20162017
OR
¨TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from             to            
Commission File Number 001-35410
_________________________________________________________
Matador Resources Company
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
  _________________________________________________________
 
Texas27-4662601
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
  
5400 LBJ Freeway, Suite 1500
Dallas, Texas
75240
(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip Code)
(972) 371-5200
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
 _________________________________________________________  
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.     x  Yes    ¨  No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    x  Yes    ¨  No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer”filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “smaller reporting“emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer x Accelerated filer ¨
    
Non-accelerated filer 
¨  (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
 Smaller reporting company ¨
Emerging growth company¨
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    ¨  Yes    x  No
As of November 1, 2016,August 2, 2017, there were 93,469,313100,437,295 shares of the registrant’s common stock, par value $0.01 per share, outstanding.

MATADOR RESOURCES COMPANY
FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBERJUNE 30, 20162017
INDEX
 Page

Part I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements — Unaudited

Matador Resources Company and Subsidiaries
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS - UNAUDITED
(In thousands, except par value and share data)
September 30,
2016
 December 31,
2015
June 30,
2017
 December 31,
2016
ASSETS      
Current assets      
Cash$20,566
 $16,732
$131,466
 $212,884
Restricted cash1,803
 44,357
15,040
 1,258
Accounts receivable      
Oil and natural gas revenues27,739
 16,616
39,621
 34,154
Joint interest billings18,796
 16,999
37,387
 19,347
Other5,657
 10,794
7,303
 5,167
Derivative instruments
 16,284
7,067
 
Lease and well equipment inventory3,182
 2,022
2,957
 3,045
Prepaid expenses3,277
 3,203
Prepaid expenses and other assets5,946
 3,327
Total current assets81,020
 127,007
246,787
 279,182
Property and equipment, at cost      
Oil and natural gas properties, full-cost method      
Evaluated2,341,342
 2,122,174
2,694,766
 2,408,305
Unproved and unevaluated445,421
 387,504
567,009
 479,736
Other property and equipment141,420
 86,387
204,299
 160,795
Less accumulated depletion, depreciation and amortization(1,832,478) (1,583,659)(1,939,570) (1,864,311)
Net property and equipment1,095,705
 1,012,406
1,526,504
 1,184,525
Other assets968
 1,448
   
Derivative instruments2,992
 
Other assets793
 958
Total other assets3,785
 958
Total assets$1,177,693
 $1,140,861
$1,777,076
 $1,464,665
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY      
Current liabilities      
Accounts payable$4,534
 $10,966
$7,371
 $4,674
Accrued liabilities93,339
 92,369
151,336
 101,460
Royalties payable21,717
 16,493
35,423
 23,988
Amounts due to affiliates7,033
 5,670
5,865
 8,651
Derivative instruments10,139
 
1,192
 24,203
Advances from joint interest owners3,847
 700
5,468
 1,700
Deferred gain on plant sale6,440
 4,830
Amounts due to joint ventures4,050
 2,793
4,873
 4,251
Income taxes payable
 2,848
Other current liabilities530
 161
656
 578
Total current liabilities151,629
 136,830
212,184
 169,505
Long-term liabilities      
Borrowings under Credit Agreement65,000
 
Senior unsecured notes payable392,153
 391,254
573,988
 573,924
Asset retirement obligations19,452
 15,166
22,391
 19,725
Derivative instruments
 751
Amounts due to joint ventures2,700
 3,956

 1,771
Derivative instruments3,838
 
Deferred gain on plant sale97,676
 102,506
Other long-term liabilities7,451
 2,190
6,142
 7,544
Total long-term liabilities588,270
 515,072
602,521
 603,715
Commitments and contingencies (Note 10)

 



 

Shareholders’ equity      
Common stock - $0.01 par value, 120,000,000 shares authorized; 93,580,969 and 85,567,021 shares issued; and 93,464,898 and 85,564,435 shares outstanding, respectively936
 856
Common stock - $0.01 par value, 160,000,000 and 120,000,000 shares authorized; 100,399,756 and 99,518,764 shares issued; and 100,324,852 and 99,511,931 shares outstanding, respectively1,004
 995
Additional paid-in capital1,176,198
 1,026,077
1,453,341
 1,325,481
Retained deficit(740,505) (538,930)
Accumulated deficit(563,858) (636,351)
Treasury stock, at cost, 74,904 and 6,833 shares, respectively(745) 
Total Matador Resources Company shareholders’ equity436,629
 488,003
889,742
 690,125
Non-controlling interest in subsidiaries1,165
 956
72,629
 1,320
Total shareholders’ equity437,794
 488,959
962,371
 691,445
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity$1,177,693
 $1,140,861
$1,777,076
 $1,464,665

Matador Resources Company and Subsidiaries
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS - UNAUDITED
(In thousands, except per share data)
Three Months Ended 
 September 30,
 Nine Months Ended 
 September 30,
Three Months Ended 
 June 30,
 Six Months Ended 
 June 30,
2016 2015 2016 20152017 2016 2017 2016
Revenues              
Oil and natural gas revenues$83,079
 $71,815
 $196,341
 $222,128
$113,764
 $69,336
 $228,611
 $113,262
Third-party midstream services revenues1,566
 569
 2,956
 1,384
2,099
 918
 3,654
 1,391
Realized gain on derivatives885
 19,862
 10,413
 52,146
Realized gain (loss) on derivatives558
 2,465
 (1,661) 9,528
Unrealized gain (loss) on derivatives3,203
 6,733
 (30,261) (25,356)13,190
 (26,625) 33,821
 (33,464)
Total revenues88,733
 98,979
 179,449
 250,302
129,611
 46,094
 264,425
 90,717
Expenses              
Production taxes, transportation and processing12,388
 9,426
 30,846
 26,734
12,875
 10,556
 24,682
 18,459
Lease operating14,605
 13,466
 41,300
 40,140
16,040
 12,183
 31,797
 26,695
Plant and other midstream services operating1,449
 1,450
 3,537
 2,772
2,942
 1,061
 5,283
 2,088
Depletion, depreciation and amortization30,015
 45,237
 90,185
 143,477
41,274
 31,248
 75,266
 60,170
Accretion of asset retirement obligations276
 182
 828
 427
314
 289
 614
 552
Full-cost ceiling impairment
 285,721
 158,633
 581,874

 78,171
 
 158,633
General and administrative13,146
 12,151
 39,506
 38,523
17,177
 13,197
 33,515
 26,360
Total expenses71,879
 367,633
 364,835
 833,947
90,622
 146,705
 171,157
 292,957
Operating income (loss)16,854
 (268,654) (185,386) (583,645)38,989
 (100,611) 93,268
 (202,240)
Other income (expense)              
Net gain (loss) on asset sales and inventory impairment1,073
 
 3,140
 (97)
Net gain on asset sales and inventory impairment
 1,002
 7
 2,067
Interest expense(6,880) (7,229) (20,244) (15,168)(9,224) (6,167) (17,679) (13,365)
Other (expense) income(141) 564
 (17) 637
Other income1,922
 29
 1,991
 124
Total other expense(5,948) (6,665) (17,121) (14,628)(7,302) (5,136) (15,681) (11,174)
Income (loss) before income taxes10,906
 (275,319) (202,507) (598,273)
Income tax (benefit) provision       
Current(1,141) (295) (1,141) (295)
Deferred
 (33,010) 
 (148,750)
Total income tax benefit(1,141) (33,305) (1,141) (149,045)
Net income (loss)12,047
 (242,014) (201,366) (449,228)31,687
 (105,747) 77,587
 (213,414)
Net income attributable to non-controlling interest in subsidiaries(116) (45) (209) (156)(3,178) (106) (5,094) (93)
Net income (loss) attributable to Matador Resources Company shareholders$11,931
 $(242,059) $(201,575) $(449,384)$28,509
 $(105,853) $72,493
 $(213,507)
Earnings (loss) per common share    
 
    
 
Basic$0.13
 $(2.86) $(2.24) $(5.58)$0.28
 $(1.15) $0.72
 $(2.40)
Diluted$0.13
 $(2.86) $(2.24) $(5.58)$0.28
 $(1.15) $0.72
 $(2.40)
Weighted average common shares outstanding              
Basic93,384
 84,685
 90,016
 80,481
100,211
 92,346
 100,005
 88,826
Diluted93,724
 84,685
 90,016
 80,481
100,227
 92,346
 100,455
 88,826

Matador Resources Company and Subsidiaries
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY - UNAUDITED
(In thousands)
For the NineSix Months Ended SeptemberJune 30, 20162017
             Total shareholders’ equity attributable to Matador Resources Company    
                 
                 
              Non-controlling interest in subsidiary Total shareholders’ equity
 Common Stock Additional
paid-in capital
 Retained deficit Treasury Stock   
 Shares Amount   Shares Amount   
Balance at January 1, 201685,567
 $856
 $1,026,077
 $(538,930) 2
 $
 $488,003
 $956
 $488,959
Issuance of common stock7,500
 75
 142,275
 
 
 
 142,350
 
 142,350
Cost to issue equity
 
 (830) 
 
 
 (830) 
 (830)
Stock-based compensation expense related to equity-based awards
 
 8,681
 
 
 
 8,681
 
 8,681
Stock options exercised, net of options forfeited in net share settlements18
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Restricted stock issued465
 5
 (5) 
 
 
 
 
 
Restricted stock forfeited
 
 
 
 114
 
 
 
 
Vesting of restricted stock units31
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Current period net loss
 
 
 (201,575) 
 
 (201,575) 209
 (201,366)
Balance at September 30, 201693,581
 $936
 $1,176,198
 $(740,505) 116
 $
 $436,629
 $1,165
 $437,794
             Total shareholders’ equity attributable to Matador Resources Company    
                 
                 
              Non-controlling interest in subsidiaries Total shareholders’ equity
 Common Stock Additional
paid-in capital
 Accumulated deficit Treasury Stock   
 Shares Amount   Shares
 Amount
   
Balance at January 1, 201799,519
 $995
 $1,325,481
 $(636,351) 6
 $
 $690,125
 $1,320
 $691,445
Issuance of common stock pursuant to employee stock compensation plan499
 5
 (5) 
 
 
 
 
 
Common stock issued to Board members and advisors55
 1
 (1) 
 
 
 
 
 
Stock-based compensation expense related to equity-based awards including amounts capitalized
 
 12,521
 
 
 
 12,521
 
 12,521
Stock options exercised, net of options forfeited in net share settlements327
 3
 (27) 
 
 
 (24) 
 (24)
Restricted stock forfeited
 
 
 
 69
 (745) (745) 
 (745)
Purchase of non-controlling interest of less-than-wholly-owned subsidiary
 
 (1,250) 
 
 
 (1,250) (1,403) (2,653)
Contributions related to formation of Joint Venture (see Note 3)
 
 116,622
 
 
 
 116,622
 54,878
 171,500
Contributions from non-controlling interest owners of less-than-wholly-owned subsidiaries
 
 
 
 
 
 
 14,700
 14,700
Distributions to non-controlling interest owners of less-than-wholly-owned subsidiaries

 
 
 
 
 
 
 (1,960) (1,960)
Current period net income
 
 
 72,493
 
 
 72,493
 5,094
 77,587
Balance at June 30, 2017100,400
 $1,004
 $1,453,341
 $(563,858) 75
 $(745) $889,742
 $72,629
 $962,371

Matador Resources Company and Subsidiaries
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS - UNAUDITED
(In thousands)
Nine Months Ended 
 September 30,
Six Months Ended 
 June 30,
2016 20152017 2016
Operating activities      
Net loss$(201,366) $(449,228)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities   
Unrealized loss on derivatives30,261
 25,356
Net income (loss)$77,587
 $(213,414)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities   
Unrealized (gain) loss on derivatives(33,821) 33,464
Depletion, depreciation and amortization90,185
 143,477
75,266
 60,170
Accretion of asset retirement obligations828
 427
614
 552
Full-cost ceiling impairment158,633
 581,874

 158,633
Stock-based compensation expense9,138
 6,886
11,192
 5,553
Deferred income tax benefit
 (148,750)
Amortization of debt issuance cost899
 551
64
 592
Net (gain) loss on asset sales and inventory impairment(3,140) 97
Net gain on asset sales and inventory impairment(7) (2,067)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities
 

 
Accounts receivable(7,782) 1,997
(25,642) (2,751)
Lease and well equipment inventory(669) (225)(140) (514)
Prepaid expenses(74) (329)(2,619) 186
Other assets480
 665
165
 520
Accounts payable, accrued liabilities and other current liabilities9,710
 16,863
4,442
 2,451
Royalties payable5,225
 6,898
11,435
 153
Advances from joint interest owners3,147
 306
3,768
 5,083
Income taxes payable(2,848) (444)
 (2,848)
Other long-term liabilities3,835
 (497)(1,062) 3,837
Net cash provided by operating activities96,462
 185,924
121,242
 49,600
Investing activities

 



 

Oil and natural gas properties capital expenditures(288,175) (334,951)(328,929) (162,381)
Expenditures for other property and equipment(57,148) (46,738)(41,743) (47,548)
Proceeds from sale of assets5,173
 
977
 
Business combination, net of cash acquired
 (24,028)
Restricted cash43,098
 

 43,437
Restricted cash in less-than-wholly-owned subsidiaries(544) 158
(13,783) 460
Net cash used in investing activities(297,596) (405,559)(383,478) (166,032)
Financing activities

 



 

Repayments of borrowings
 (476,982)
Borrowings under Credit Agreement65,000
 125,000
Proceeds from issuance of senior unsecured notes
 400,000
Cost to issue senior unsecured notes
 (9,479)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock142,350
 188,720

 142,350
Cost to issue equity(830) (1,151)
 (768)
Proceeds from stock options exercised
 10
2,201
 
Capital commitments from non-controlling interest owners in less-than-wholly-owned subsidiaries
 562
Contributions related to formation of Joint Venture171,500
 
Contributions from non-controlling interest owners of less-than-wholly-owned subsidiaries14,700
 
Distributions to non-controlling interest owners of less-than-wholly-owned subsidiaries(1,960) 
Taxes paid related to net share settlement of stock-based compensation(1,552) (1,565)(2,970) (1,009)
Purchase of non-controlling interest of less-than-wholly-owned subsidiary(2,653) 
Net cash provided by financing activities204,968
 225,115
180,818
 140,573
Increase in cash3,834
 5,480
(Decrease) increase in cash(81,418) 24,141
Cash at beginning of period16,732
 8,407
212,884
 16,732
Cash at end of period$20,566
 $13,887
$131,466
 $40,873
      
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information (Note 11)

 



 


Table of Contents
Matador Resources Company and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -
UNAUDITED
NOTE 1 - NATURE OF OPERATIONS
Matador Resources Company, a Texas corporation (“Matador” and, collectively with its subsidiaries, the “Company”), is an independent energy company engaged in the exploration, development, production and acquisition of oil and natural gas resources in the United States, with an emphasis on oil and natural gas shale and other unconventional plays. The Company’s current operations are focused primarily on the oil and liquids-rich portion of the Wolfcamp and Bone Spring plays in the Delaware Basin in Southeast New Mexico and West Texas. The Company also operates in the Eagle Ford shale play in South Texas and the Haynesville shale and Cotton Valley plays in Northwest Louisiana and East Texas. Additionally, the Company conducts midstream operations, primarily through its midstream joint venture, San Mateo Midstream, LLC (“San Mateo” or the “Joint Venture”), in support of itsthe Company’s exploration, development and production operations and provides natural gas processing, natural gas, oil and salt water gathering services and salt water disposal services to third parties on a limited basis.
NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Interim Financial Statements, Basis of Presentation, Consolidation and Significant Estimates
The interim unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of Matador and its subsidiaries have been prepared in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) but do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) for complete financial statements and should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 20152016 (the “Annual Report”) filed with the SEC. The Company consolidates certain subsidiaries and joint ventures that are less-than-wholly-ownedless than wholly owned and are not involved in oil and natural gas exploration, including San Mateo, and the net income and equity attributable to the non-controlling interest in these subsidiaries have been reported separately as required by Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 810. The Company proportionately consolidates certain joint ventures that are less-than-wholly-ownedless than wholly owned and are involved in oil and natural gas exploration. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. In management’s opinion, these interim unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include all adjustments, consisting only of normal, recurring adjustments, which are necessary for a fair presentation of the Company’s interim unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements as of SeptemberJune 30, 2016.2017. Amounts as of December 31, 20152016 are derived from the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements in the Annual Report.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. These estimates and assumptions may also affect disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. The Company’s interim unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements are based on a number of significant estimates, including accruals for oil and natural gas revenues, accrued assets and liabilities primarily related to oil and natural gas operations, stock-based compensation, valuation of derivative instruments and oil and natural gas reserves. The estimates of oil and natural gas reserves quantities and future net cash flows are the basis for the calculations of depletion and impairment of oil and natural gas properties, as well as estimates of asset retirement obligations and certain tax accruals. While the Company believes its estimates are reasonable, changes in facts and assumptions or the discovery of new information may result in revised estimates. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
Reclassifications
Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior periods’ financial statements to conform to the current period presentation. As a result of the growth of the Company’s midstream operations, these operations met the required threshold for segment reporting at September 30, 2016.reporting. As a result, $0.5 million and $1.3$0.9 million for the three and nine months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2015, respectively,2016 and $1.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016 were reclassified from other income to third-party midstream services revenues and $0.1 million for both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 was reclassified from production taxes, transportation and processing expenses to third-party midstream services revenues. In addition, $1.5 million and $2.8$1.1 million related to midstream operating costs for the three and nine months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2015, respectively,2016 and $2.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016 were reclassified from lease operating expenses to plant and other midstream services operating expenses. These reclassifications had no effect on previously reported results of operations, cash flows or retained earnings.
ChangeProperty and Equipment
The Company uses the full-cost method of accounting for its investments in Accounting Principle
During the second quarter of 2016,oil and natural gas properties. Under this method, the Company adopted Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-09, Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718),which simplifies several aspectsis required to perform a ceiling test each quarter that determines a limit, or ceiling, on the capitalized costs of oil and natural gas properties based primarily on the accounting for employee share-based payment transactions, including accounting for income tax, forfeitures, statutory tax withholding requirements, classifications of awards as either equity or liability and classification of taxes in the statement ofafter-tax estimated future net cash flows requiring either retrospective, modified retrospective or prospective transition. The amended guidance also requires an entity to record excess tax benefitsfrom oil and natural gas properties using a 10% discount rate and the arithmetic average of first-day-of-the-month oil and natural gas prices for the prior 12-month period. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, the cost center ceiling was higher than the capitalized costs

87

Table of Contents
Matador Resources Company and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -
UNAUDITED - CONTINUED

NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES - Continued

deficiencies in the income statement. The adoption of this ASU had no impact on any period presented for (i) the Company’s financial position or statements of operations, as the Company currently has a valuation allowance against its net deferred tax assets, or (ii) the Company’s statements of cash flows, as the Company has historically accounted for taxes paid for net share settlement as a financing activity as required under this ASU. In addition, the Company uses historical forfeiture rates to estimate future forfeitures attributable to the service-based vesting requirements not being met and has continued to do so upon adoption of this ASU.
Property and Equipment
The Company uses the full-cost method of accounting for its investments in oil and natural gas properties. Under this method, the Company is required to perform a ceiling test each quarter which determines a limit, or ceiling, on the capitalized costs of oil and natural gas properties based primarily on the after-tax estimated future net cash flows from oil and natural gas properties using a 10% discount rate and the arithmetic average of first-day-of-the-month oil and natural gas prices for the prior 12-month period. For the three months ended September 30, 2016, the cost center ceiling was higher than the capitalized costs of oil and natural gas properties, thusproperties; no impairment charge was necessary; however,necessary. However, due primarily to declines in oil and natural gas prices in recent periods,early 2016, the capitalized costs of oil and natural gas properties exceeded the cost center ceiling for the first two quarters ofthree and six months ended June 30, 2016, and all of 2015, and as a result, the Company recorded impairment charges to its net capitalized costs of $78.2 million and $158.6 million, respectively, in its interim unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations of $285.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015, and $158.6 million and $581.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.operations.
The Company capitalized approximately $4.3$5.2 million and $1.4$4.0 million of its general and administrative costs for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20162017 and 2015,2016, respectively, and approximately $0.7$1.9 million and $0.5$1.7 million of its interest expense for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20162017 and 2015,2016, respectively. The Company capitalized approximately $10.3$10.8 million and $4.9$6.0 million of its general and administrative costs for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20162017 and 2015,2016, respectively, and approximately $2.9$3.2 million and $2.2 million of its interest expense for each of the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2017 and 2016, and 2015.respectively.
Earnings (Loss) Per Common Share
The Company reports basic earnings (loss) attributable to Matador Resources Company shareholders per common share, which excludes the effect of potentially dilutive securities, and diluted earnings (loss) attributable to Matador Resources Company shareholders per common share, which includes the effect of all potentially dilutive securities unless their impact is anti-dilutive.
The following table sets forth the computation of diluted weighted average common shares outstanding for the three and ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20162017 and 20152016 (in thousands).
Three Months Ended 
 September 30,
 Nine Months Ended 
 September 30,
Three Months Ended 
 June 30,
 Six Months Ended 
 June 30,
2016 2015 2016 20152017 2016 2017 2016
Weighted average common shares outstanding              
Basic93,384
 84,685
 90,016
 80,481
100,211
 92,346
 100,005
 88,826
Dilutive effect of options, restricted stock units and preferred shares340
 
 
 
Dilutive effect of options and restricted stock units16
 
 450
 
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding93,724
 84,685
 90,016
 80,481
100,227
 92,346
 100,455
 88,826
A total of 2.9 million options to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock and 0.1 million restricted stock units were excluded from the diluted weighted average common shares outstanding for the nine months ended September 30, 2016, because their effects were anti-dilutive. Additionally, 1.0 million restricted shares, which are participating securities, were excluded from the calculations above for the nine months ended September 30, 2016, as the security holders do not have the obligation to share in the losses of the Company.
A total of 2.4 million options to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock and 0.1 million restricted stock units were excluded from the diluted weighted average common shares outstanding for both the three and ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2015, respectively, and zero and 1.5 million preferred shares were excluded from the calculations above for both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015,2016, respectively, because their effects were anti-dilutive. Additionally, 0.80.9 million restricted shares, which are participating securities, were excluded from the calculations above for both the three and

9

Table of Contents
Matador Resources Company and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -
UNAUDITED - CONTINUED

NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES - Continued

nine six months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2015,2016, respectively, as the security holders do not have the obligation to share in the losses of the Company.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Revenue from Contracts with Customers. In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASUAccounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606),which specifies how and when to recognize revenue. In addition, thisThis standard requires expanded disclosures surrounding revenue recognition and is intended to improve, and converge with international standards, the financial reporting requirements for revenue from contracts with customers. ThisIn August 2015, the FASB issued ASU will become2015-14, which defers the effective date of ASU 2014-09 for one year to fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017 with early adoption permitted2016. In May 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-11, which rescinds guidance from the SEC on accounting for periods beginning after December 15, 2016. Entities can transition togas balancing arrangements and will eliminate the standard either retrospectively to each period presented or as a cumulative-effect adjustment asuse of the dateentitlements method. Entities have the option of adoption.using either a full retrospective or modified approach to adopt the new standards. In December 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-20, which clarifies disclosure requirements in ASU 2014-09. The Company expects to adopt the new guidance effective January 1, 2018 using the modified approach. The Company is currently evaluating the impact, if any,new guidance, including (i) identification of the adoptionrevenue streams and (ii) review of this ASU on its consolidated financial statements.contracts and procedures currently in place.
Leases. In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842), which requires the recognition of lease assets and lease liabilities by lessees for those leases classified as operating leases under previous U.S. GAAP. This ASU will become effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018 with early adoption permitted. Entities are required to recognize and measure leases at the beginning of the earliest period presented using a modified retrospective approach. The modified retrospective approach includes a number of optional practical expedients that entities may elect to apply. These practical expedients relate to the identification and classification of leases that commenced before the effective date, initial

8

Table of Contents
Matador Resources Company and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -
UNAUDITED - CONTINUED

NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES - Continued

direct costs for leases that commenced before the effective date and the ability to use hindsight in evaluating lessee options to extend or terminate a lease or to purchase the underlying asset. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of this ASU on its consolidated financial statements.
Statement of Cash Flows. In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230), which specifies that a statement of cash flows explain the change during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. This ASU will become effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. The update should be applied using a retrospective transition method to each period presented. The Company believes that the impact of the adoption of this ASU will change the presentation of its beginning and ending cash balances on its Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and eliminate the presentation of changes in restricted cash balances from investing activities on its Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
Clarifying the Definition of a Business. In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805), which specifies the minimum inputs and processes required for an integrated set of assets and activities to meet the definition of a business. This ASU will become effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017 with early adoption permitted. Entities are required to apply guidance prospectively upon adoption. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of this ASU on its consolidated financial statements.
NOTE 3 - EQUITY– BUSINESS COMBINATION
Joint Venture
On March 11, 2016,February 17, 2017, the Company completed a public offering of 7,500,000 sharescontributed substantially all of its common stock. After deducting offering costs totaling approximately $0.8midstream assets located in the Rustler Breaks (Eddy County, New Mexico) and Wolf (Loving County, Texas) asset areas in the Delaware Basin to San Mateo, a joint venture with a subsidiary of Five Point Capital Partners LLC (“Five Point”). The midstream assets contributed to San Mateo include (i) the Black River cryogenic natural gas processing plant in the Rustler Breaks asset area (the “Black River Processing Plant”); (ii) one salt water disposal well and a related commercial salt water disposal facility in the Rustler Breaks asset area; (iii) three salt water disposal wells and related commercial salt water disposal facilities in the Wolf asset area; and (iv) substantially all related oil, natural gas and water gathering systems and pipelines in both the Rustler Breaks and Wolf asset areas (collectively, the “Delaware Midstream Assets”). The Company continues to operate the Delaware Midstream Assets. The Company retained its ownership in certain midstream assets in South Texas and Northwest Louisiana, which are not part of the Joint Venture.
The Company and Five Point own 51% and 49% of the Joint Venture, respectively. Five Point provided initial cash consideration of $176.4 million to the Joint Venture in exchange for its 49% interest. Approximately $171.5 million of this cash contribution by Five Point was distributed by the Joint Venture to the Company received net proceeds of approximately $141.5as a special distribution. The Company may earn an additional $73.5 million which were usedin performance incentives over the next five years. The Company contributed the Delaware Midstream Assets and $5.1 million in cash to the Joint Venture in exchange for general corporate purposes, includingits 51% interest. The parties to fund a portion ofthe Joint Venture have also committed to spend up to an additional $140.0 million in the aggregate to expand the Joint Venture’s midstream operations and asset base. The Joint Venture is consolidated in the Company’s 2016 capital expenditures.interim unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements with Five Point’s interest in the Joint Venture being accounted for as a non-controlling interest.
In connection with the Joint Venture, the Company dedicated its current and future leasehold interests in the Rustler Breaks and Wolf asset areas pursuant to 15-year, fixed-fee natural gas, oil and salt water gathering agreements and salt water disposal agreements, effective as of February 1, 2017. In addition, the Company dedicated its current and future leasehold interests in the Rustler Breaks asset area pursuant to a 15-year, fixed fee natural gas processing agreement (see Note 10).

9

Table of Contents
Matador Resources Company and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -
UNAUDITED - CONTINUED

NOTE 4 - ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATIONS


The following table summarizes the changes in the Company’s asset retirement obligations for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20162017 (in thousands).
  
Beginning asset retirement obligations$15,420
$20,640
Liabilities incurred during period1,903
1,222
Liabilities settled during period(317)(176)
Revisions in estimated cash flows1,647
794
Accretion expense828
614
Ending asset retirement obligations19,481
23,094
Less: current asset retirement obligations(1)
(29)(703)
Long-term asset retirement obligations$19,452
$22,391
 _______________
(1)
Included in accrued liabilities in the Company’s interim unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet at SeptemberJune 30, 20162017.
NOTE 5 - DEBT
At SeptemberJune 30, 2016,2017 and August 2, 2017, the Company had $400$575.0 million of outstanding 6.875% senior notes due 2023, (the “Notes”), $65.0 million inno borrowings outstanding under the Company’s revolving credit agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) and approximately $0.8 million in outstanding letters of credit issued pursuant to the Credit Agreement. At November 1, 2016, the Company had $400.0 million in Notes outstanding, $95.0 million in borrowings outstanding
Credit Agreement
The borrowing base under the Credit Agreement is determined semi-annually as of May 1 and approximately $0.8November 1 by the lenders based primarily on the estimated value of the Company’s proved oil and natural gas reserves at December 31 and June 30 of each year, respectively. Both the Company and the lenders may request an unscheduled redetermination of the borrowing base once each between scheduled redetermination dates. During the first quarter of 2017, the lenders completed their review of the Company’s proved oil and natural gas reserves at December 31, 2016, and on April 28, 2017, the borrowing base was increased to $450.0 million and the maximum facility amount remained at $500.0 million. The Company elected to keep the borrowing commitment at $400.0 million. Borrowings under the Credit Agreement are limited to the least of the borrowing base, the maximum facility amount and the elected commitment. The Credit Agreement matures on October 16, 2020.
In the event of an increase in the elected commitment, the Company is required to pay a fee to the lenders equal to a percentage of the amount of the increase, which is determined based on market conditions at the time of the increase. Total deferred loan costs were $1.1 million at June 30, 2017, and these costs are being amortized over the term of the Credit Agreement, which approximates amortization of these costs using the effective interest method. If, upon a redetermination of the borrowing base, the borrowing base were to be less than the outstanding lettersborrowings under the Credit Agreement at any time, the Company would be required to provide additional collateral satisfactory in nature and value to the lenders to increase the borrowing base to an amount sufficient to cover such excess or to repay the deficit in equal installments over a period of creditsix months.
The Company believes that it was in compliance with the terms of the Credit Agreement at June 30, 2017.
Senior Unsecured Notes
On April 14, 2015 and December 9, 2016, the Company issued $400.0 million and $175.0 million, respectively, of 6.875% senior notes due 2023 (collectively, the “Notes”). The Notes mature on April 15, 2023, and interest is payable semi-annually in arrears on April and October 15 of each year.
On May 24, 2017, and pursuant to a registered exchange offer, the Credit Agreement.Company exchanged all of the $175.0 million of Notes issued on December 9, 2016, which were privately placed, for a like principal amount of 6.875% senior notes due 2023 that have been registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The terms of such registered Notes are substantially the same as the terms of the original Notes except that the transfer restrictions, registration rights and provisions for additional interest relating to the original Notes do not apply to the registered Notes.

10

Table of Contents
Matador Resources Company and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -
UNAUDITED - CONTINUED

NOTE 5 - DEBT - Continued

On February 17, 2017, in connection with the formation of San Mateo (see Note 3), Matador entered into a Fourth Supplemental Indenture (the “Fourth Supplemental Indenture”), which supplements the indenture governing the Notes. Pursuant to the Fourth Supplemental Indenture, (i) Longwood Midstream Holdings, LLC, the holder of Matador’s 51% equity interest in San Mateo, was designated as a guarantor of the Notes and (ii) DLK Black River Midstream, LLC and Black River Water Management Company, LLC, each subsidiaries of San Mateo, were released as parties to, and as guarantors of, the Notes. The borrowing baseguarantors of the Notes, following the effectiveness of the Fourth Supplemental Indenture, are referred to herein as the “Guarantor Subsidiaries.” San Mateo and its subsidiaries (the “Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries”) are not guarantors of the Notes, although they remain restricted subsidiaries under the Credit Agreement is determined semi-annually as of May 1 and November 1 byindenture governing the lenders based primarily on the estimated value of the Company’s proved oil and natural gas reserves at December 31 and June 30 of each year, respectively. Both the Company and the lenders may request an unscheduled redetermination of the borrowing base once each between scheduled redetermination dates. On May 3, 2016, the borrowing base under the Credit Agreement was reduced to $300.0 million from $375.0 million based on the lenders’ review of the Company’s proved oil and natural gas reserves at December 31, 2015. At September 30, 2016, the borrowing base under the Credit Agreement remained $300.0 million. During the fourth quarter of 2016, the lenders completed their review of the Company’s estimated total proved oil and natural gas reserves at June 30, 2016, and as a result, in late October 2016, the borrowing base under the Credit Agreement was increased to $400.0 million. This October 2016 redetermination constituted the regularly scheduled November 1 redetermination.
In the event of a borrowing base increase, the Company is required to pay a fee to the lenders equal to a percentage of the amount of the increase, which is determined based on market conditions at the time of the borrowing base increase. If, upon a redetermination of the borrowing base, the borrowing base were to be less than the outstanding borrowings under the Credit Agreement at any time, the Company would be required to provide additional collateral satisfactory in nature and value to the lenders to increase the borrowing base to an amount sufficient to cover such excess or to repay the deficit in equal installments over a period of six months.Notes.
The Company believes that it wasfollowing presents condensed consolidating financial information on an issuer (Matador), Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries, Guarantor Subsidiaries and consolidated basis (in thousands). Elimination entries are necessary to combine the entities. This financial information is presented in complianceaccordance with the termsrequirements of the Credit Agreement at September 30, 2016.
On April 14, 2015, the Company issued the Notes, which are jointly and severally guaranteed by certain subsidiariesRule 3-10 of Matador (the “Guarantor Subsidiaries”) on a full and unconditional basis (except for customary release provisions). At September 30, 2016, allRegulation S-X. The following financial information may not necessarily be indicative of results of operations, cash flows or financial position had the Guarantor Subsidiaries are 100% owned by operated as independent entities.
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet
June 30, 2017
  Matador Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries Guarantor Subsidiaries Eliminating Entries Consolidated
ASSETS          
Intercompany receivable $385,885
 $
 $1,679
 $(387,564) $
Third-party current assets 2,944
 16,953
 226,890
 
 246,787
Net property and equipment 
 151,331
 1,375,173
 
 1,526,504
Investment in subsidiaries 1,083,542
 
 75,585
 (1,159,127) 
Third-party long-term assets 
 
 3,785
 
 3,785
Total assets $1,472,371
 $168,284
 $1,683,112
 $(1,546,691) $1,777,076
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY          
Intercompany payable $
 $1,679
 $385,885
 $(387,564) $
Third-party current liabilities 8,640
 17,753
 185,791
 
 212,184
Senior unsecured notes payable 573,988
 
 
 
 573,988
Other third-party long-term liabilities 
 639
 27,894
 
 28,533
Total equity attributable to Matador Resources Company 889,743
 75,584
 1,083,542
 (1,159,127) 889,742
Non-controlling interest in subsidiaries 
 72,629
 
 
 72,629
Total liabilities and equity $1,472,371
 $168,284
 $1,683,112
 $(1,546,691) $1,777,076
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet
December 31, 2016
  Matador Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries Guarantor Subsidiaries Eliminating Entries Consolidated
ASSETS          
Intercompany receivable $316,791
 $3,571
 $12,091
 $(332,453) $
Third-party current assets 101,102
 4,242
 173,838
 
 279,182
Net property and equipment 33
 113,107
 1,071,385
 
 1,184,525
Investment in subsidiaries 856,762
 
 90,275
 (947,037) 
Third-party long-term assets 
 
 958
 
 958
Total assets $1,274,688
 $120,920
 $1,348,547
 $(1,279,490) $1,464,665
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY          
Intercompany payable $
 $12,091
 $320,362
 $(332,453) $
Third-party current liabilities 9,265
 16,632
 143,608
 
 169,505
Senior unsecured notes payable 573,924
 
 
 
 573,924
Other third-party long-term liabilities 1,374
 602
 27,815
 
 29,791
Total equity attributable to Matador Resources Company 690,125
 90,275
 856,762
 (947,037) 690,125
Non-controlling interest in subsidiaries 
 1,320
 
 
 1,320
Total liabilities and equity $1,274,688
 $120,920
 $1,348,547
 $(1,279,490) $1,464,665


11

Table of Contents
Matador Resources Company and any subsidiariesSubsidiaries
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -
UNAUDITED - CONTINUED

NOTE 5 - DEBT - Continued


Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations
For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2017
  Matador Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries Guarantor Subsidiaries Eliminating Entries Consolidated
Total revenues $
 $11,274
 $127,198
 $(8,861) $129,611
Total expenses 1,586
 4,814
 93,083
 (8,861) 90,622
Operating (loss) income (1,586) 6,460
 34,115
 
 38,989
Net gain on asset sales and inventory impairment 
 
 
 
 
Interest expense (9,224) 
 
 
 (9,224)
Other income (27) 26
 1,923
 
 1,922
Earnings in subsidiaries 39,228
 
 3,244
 (42,472) 
Income before income taxes 28,391
 6,486
 39,282
 (42,472) 31,687
Total income tax (benefit) provision

 (118) 64
 54
 
 
Net income attributable to non-controlling interest in subsidiaries 
 (3,178) 
 
 (3,178)
Net income attributable to Matador Resources Company shareholders $28,509
 $3,244
 $39,228
 $(42,472) $28,509
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations
For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2016
  Matador Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries Guarantor Subsidiaries Eliminating Entries Consolidated
Total revenues $
 $3,210
 $44,778
 $(1,894) $46,094
Total expenses 1,032
 1,244
 146,323
 (1,894) 146,705
Operating (loss) income (1,032) 1,966
 (101,545) 
 (100,611)
Net gain on asset sales and inventory impairment 
 
 1,002
 
 1,002
Interest expense (6,167) 
 
 
 (6,167)
Other income 
 
 29
 
 29
(Loss) earnings in subsidiaries (98,672) 
 1,842
 96,830
 
(Loss) income before income taxes (105,871) 1,966
 (98,672) 96,830
 (105,747)
Total income tax (benefit) provision (18) 18
 
 
 
Net income attributable to non-controlling interest in subsidiaries 
 (106) 
 
 (106)
Net (loss) income attributable to Matador Resources Company shareholders $(105,853) $1,842
 $(98,672) $96,830
 $(105,853)


12

Table of Contents
Matador other than the GuarantorResources Company and Subsidiaries are minor.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -
UNAUDITED - CONTINUED

NOTE 5 - DEBT - Continued

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2017
  Matador Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries Guarantor Subsidiaries Eliminating Entries Consolidated
Total revenues $
 $20,937
 $259,846
 $(16,358) $264,425
Total expenses 2,846
 8,682
 175,987
 (16,358) 171,157
Operating (loss) income (2,846)
12,255

83,859



93,268
Net gain on asset sales and inventory impairment 
 
 7
 
 7
Interest expense (17,679) 
 
 
 (17,679)
Other income 
 26
 1,965
 
 1,991
Earnings in subsidiaries

 92,900
 
 7,069
 (99,969) 
Income before income taxes 72,375

12,281

92,900

(99,969)
77,587
Total income tax (benefit) provision

 (118) 118
 
 
 
Net income attributable to non-controlling interest in subsidiaries 
 (5,094) 
 
 (5,094)
Net income attributable to Matador Resources Company shareholders $72,493

$7,069

$92,900

$(99,969)
$72,493
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2016
  Matador Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries Guarantor Subsidiaries Eliminating Entries Consolidated
Total revenues $
 $4,527
 $88,825
 $(2,635) $90,717
Total expenses 2,967
 2,377
 290,248
 (2,635) 292,957
Operating (loss) income (2,967)
2,150

(201,423)


(202,240)
Net gain on asset sales and inventory impairment 
 
 2,067
 
 2,067
Interest expense (13,365) 
 
 
 (13,365)
Other income 
 
 124
 
 124
(Loss) earnings in subsidiaries (197,200) 
 2,032
 195,168
 
Income before income taxes (213,532)
2,150

(197,200)
195,168
 (213,414)
Total income tax (benefit) provision

 (25) 25
 
 
 
Net income attributable to non-controlling interest in subsidiaries 
 (93) 
 
 (93)
Net (loss) income attributable to Matador Resources Company shareholders $(213,507)
$2,032

$(197,200)
$195,168

$(213,507)


13

Table of Contents
Matador is a parent holding companyResources Company and has no independent assets or operations, and there are no significant restrictions on the ability of Matador to obtain funds from the Guarantor Subsidiaries by dividend or loan.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -
UNAUDITED - CONTINUED

NOTE 5 - DEBT - Continued

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2017
  Matador Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries Guarantor Subsidiaries Eliminating Entries Consolidated
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities $(98,583) $1,566
 $218,259
 $
 $121,242
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities 33
 (51,580) (198,051) (133,880) (383,478)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities 
 47,707
 (769) 133,880
 180,818
(Decrease) increase in cash (98,550) (2,307) 19,439
 
 (81,418)
Cash at beginning of period 99,795
 2,307
 110,782
 
 212,884
Cash at end of period $1,245
 $
 $130,221
 $
 $131,466

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2016
  Matador Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries Guarantor Subsidiaries Eliminating Entries Consolidated
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities $(24,519) $(6,198) $80,317
 $
 $49,600
Net cash used in investing activities (117,086) (44,074) (172,108) 167,236
 (166,032)
Net cash provided by financing activities 141,582
 50,150
 116,077
 (167,236) 140,573
(Decrease) increase in cash (23) (122) 24,286
 
 24,141
Cash at beginning of period 80
 186
 16,466
 
 16,732
Cash at end of period $57
 $64
 $40,752
 $
 $40,873
NOTE 6 - INCOME TAXES
The Company’s deferred tax assets exceedexceeded its deferred tax liabilities at June 30, 2017 due to the deferred tax assets generated by the full-cost ceiling impairment charges recorded in prior periods; as a result, the Company established a valuation allowance against most of the deferred tax assets beginning in the third quarter of 2015. The Company retainsretained a full valuation allowance at SeptemberJune 30, 20162017 due to uncertainties regarding the future realization of its deferred tax assets. The valuation allowance will continue to be recognized until the realization of future deferred tax benefits are more likely than not to be utilized. The current tax benefit for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 represents a refund due from the Internal Revenue Service for 2015 income taxes.
The total income tax benefit for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 differed from amounts computed by applying the U.S. federal statutory tax rate to loss before income taxes due primarily to the recording of the valuation allowance against the net deferred tax assets, which resulted from the full-cost ceiling impairment recorded in the third quarter of 2015.

NOTE 7 - STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
In February 2016,2017, the Company granted awards of 243,428228,174 shares of restricted stock and options to purchase 608,287590,128 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $15.00$27.26 per share to certain of its employees. The fair value of these awards was approximately $7.0$12.4 million. All of these awards vest onratably over three years. In February 2017, the three-year anniversary of the grant date of these awards. In August 2016, the Company also granted awards of 177,024174,561 shares of restricted stock and options to purchase 39,903444,491 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $22.70$26.86 per share to certain of its employees. The fair value of these awards was $4.3approximately $9.3 million. All of these awards vest ratably over three years.
In June 2017, the Company granted an employee an award of 87,757 shares of common stock that vested immediately on the grant date. The fair value of this award was approximately $2.1 million. In June 2017, the Company also accelerated the expense for 97,797 restricted stock units issued to directors and outstanding prior to June 2017, resulting from a change in the vesting schedule applicable to equity awards granted to the Company’s directors. The total expense associated with these restricted stock units recognized in the three months ended June 30, 2017 was approximately $1.5 million.

14

Table of Contents
Matador Resources Company and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -
UNAUDITED - CONTINUED

NOTE 8 - DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS


At SeptemberJune 30, 2016,2017, the Company had various costless collar contracts open and in place to mitigate its exposure to oil and natural gas price volatility, each with a specific term (calculation period), notional quantity (volume hedged) and price floor and ceiling. Each contract is set to expire at varying times during 2017 and 2018.
The following is a summary of the Company’s open costless collar contracts for oil and natural gas at June 30, 2017.
CommodityCalculation Period Notional Quantity (Bbl or MMBtu) Weighted Average Price Floor ($/Bbl or
$/MMBtu)
 Weighted Average Price Ceiling ($/Bbl or
$/MMBtu)
 Fair Value of Asset (Liability) (thousands)
Oil07/01/2017 - 12/31/2017 2,460,000
 $45.17
 $55.75
 $4,365
Oil01/01/2018 - 12/31/2018 1,920,000
 $43.91
 $63.44
 4,990
Natural Gas07/01/2017 - 12/31/2017 12,540,000
 $2.51
 $3.60
 (500)
Natural Gas01/01/2018 - 12/31/2018 16,800,000
 $2.58
 $3.67
 12
Total open derivative financial instruments       $8,867
These derivative financial instruments are subject to master netting arrangements; all but one counterparty allow for cross-commodity master netting provided the settlement dates for the commodities are the same. The Company does not present different types of commodities with the same counterparty on a net basis in its interim unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets.
The following table presents the gross asset and liability fair values of the Company’s commodity price derivative financial instruments and the location of these balances in the interim unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 and 2017.(in thousands).
Derivative InstrumentsGross
amounts
recognized
 Gross amounts
netted in the condensed
consolidated
balance sheets
 Net amounts presented in the condensed
consolidated
balance sheets
June 30, 2017     
   Current assets$10,835
 $(3,768) $7,067
   Other assets5,066
 (2,074) 2,992
   Current liabilities(4,915) 3,723
 (1,192)
   Other liabilities(2,074) 2,074
 
      Total$8,912
 $(45) $8,867
December 31, 2016     
   Current liabilities$(24,203) $
 $(24,203)
   Other liabilities(751) 
 (751)
      Total$(24,954) $
 $(24,954)

1115

Table of Contents
Matador Resources Company and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -
UNAUDITED - CONTINUED

NOTE 8 - DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS - Continued

The following is a summary of the Company’s open costless collar contracts for oil and natural gas at September 30, 2016.
CommodityCalculation Period Notional Quantity (Bbl or MMBtu) Weighted Average Price Floor ($/Bbl or
$/MMBtu)
 Weighted Average Price Ceiling ($/Bbl or
$/MMBtu)
 Fair Value of Asset (Liability) (thousands)
Oil10/01/2016 - 12/31/2016 690,000
 $42.48
 $61.16
 $(788)
Oil01/01/2017 - 12/31/2017 2,160,000
 $39.56
 $50.36
 (11,097)
Natural Gas10/01/2016 - 12/31/2016 4,660,000
 $2.65
 $3.68
 (43)
Natural Gas01/01/2017 - 12/31/2017 16,860,000
 $2.40
 $3.59
 (2,049)
Total open derivative financial instruments       $(13,977)
These derivative financial instruments are subject to master netting arrangements; all but one counterparty allow for cross-commodity master netting provided the settlement dates for the commodities are the same. The Company does not present different types of commodities with the same counterparty on a net basis in its interim unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets.

12

Table of Contents
Matador Resources Company and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -
UNAUDITED - CONTINUED

NOTE 8 - DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS - Continued

The following table presents the gross asset and liability fair values of the Company’s commodity price derivative financial instruments and the location of these balances in the interim unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 (in thousands).
Derivative InstrumentsGross
amounts
recognized
 Gross amounts
netted in the condensed
consolidated
balance sheets
 Net amounts presented in the condensed
consolidated
balance sheets
September 30, 2016     
   Current assets$3,498
 $(3,498) $
   Other assets1,512
 (1,512) 
   Current liabilities(13,637) 3,498
 (10,139)
   Other liabilities(5,350) 1,512
 (3,838)
      Total$(13,977) $
 $(13,977)
December 31, 2015     
   Current assets$16,767
 $(483) $16,284
   Current liabilities(483) 483
 
      Total$16,284
 $
 $16,284
The following table summarizes the location and aggregate fair value of all derivative financial instruments recorded in the interim unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations for the periods presented (in thousands). These derivative financial instruments are not designated as hedging instruments.
  Three Months Ended 
 September 30,
 Nine Months Ended 
 September 30,
  Three Months Ended 
 June 30,
 Six Months Ended 
 June 30,
Type of InstrumentLocation in Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations 2016 2015 2016 2015Location in Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations 2017 2016 2017 2016
Derivative Instrument                
OilRevenues: Realized gain on derivatives $837
 $17,056
 $6,861
 $42,013
Revenues: Realized gain (loss) on derivatives $581
 $561
 $(1,053) $6,024
Natural GasRevenues: Realized gain on derivatives 48
 2,215
 3,552
 8,531
Revenues: Realized (loss) gain on derivatives (23) 1,904
 (608) 3,504
Natural Gas LiquidsRevenues: Realized gain on derivatives 
 591
 
 1,602
Realized gain on derivatives 885
 19,862
 10,413
 52,146
Realized gain (loss) on derivativesRealized gain (loss) on derivatives 558
 2,465
 (1,661) 9,528
OilRevenues: Unrealized gain (loss) on derivatives 2,007
 6,421
 (24,967) (19,923)Revenues: Unrealized gain (loss) on derivatives 10,643
 (19,319) 28,422
 (26,974)
Natural GasRevenues: Unrealized gain (loss) on derivatives 1,196
 808
 (5,294) (4,035)Revenues: Unrealized gain (loss) on derivatives 2,547
 (7,306) 5,399
 (6,490)
Natural Gas LiquidsRevenues: Unrealized loss on derivatives 
 (496) 
 (1,398)
Unrealized gain (loss) on derivativesUnrealized gain (loss) on derivatives 3,203
 6,733
 (30,261) (25,356)Unrealized gain (loss) on derivatives 13,190
 (26,625) 33,821
 (33,464)
Total $4,088
 $26,595
 $(19,848) $26,790
 $13,748
 $(24,160) $32,160
 $(23,936)
NOTE 9 - FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
The Company measures and reports certain financial and non-financial assets and liabilities on a fair value basis. Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (exit price). Fair value measurements are classified and disclosed in one of the following categories in the fair value hierarchy:categories.
Level 1Unadjusted quoted prices for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities in active markets.
Level 2Quoted prices in markets that are not active, or inputs which are observable, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability. This category includes those derivative instruments that are valued with industry standard models that consider various inputs including: (i) quoted forward prices for commodities, (ii) time value of money and (iii) current market and contractual prices for the underlying instruments, as well as other relevant economic measures. Substantially all of these inputs are observable in the marketplace throughout the full term of the derivative instrument and can be derived from observable data or supported by observable levels at which transactions are executed in the marketplace.
Level 3Unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data that reflect a company’s own market assumptions.
Financial and non-financial assets and liabilities are classified based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement requires judgment, which may affect the valuation of the fair value of assets and liabilities and their placement within the fair value hierarchy levels.
The following tables summarize the valuation of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities that were accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis in accordance with the classifications provided above as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 (in thousands).
 Fair Value Measurements at
June 30, 2017 using
DescriptionLevel 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
Assets (Liabilities)       
Oil and natural gas derivatives$
 $10,059
 $
 $10,059
Oil and natural gas derivatives
 (1,192) 
 (1,192)
Total$
 $8,867
 $
 $8,867

1316

Table of Contents
Matador Resources Company and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -
UNAUDITED - CONTINUED

NOTE 9 - FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS - Continued

Level 2Quoted prices in markets that are not active, or inputs which are observable, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability. This category includes those derivative instruments that are valued with industry standard models that consider various inputs including: (i) quoted forward prices for commodities, (ii) time value of money and (iii) current market and contractual prices for the underlying instruments, as well as other relevant economic measures. Substantially all of these inputs are observable in the marketplace throughout the full term of the derivative instrument and can be derived from observable data or supported by observable levels at which transactions are executed in the marketplace.
Level 3Unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data which reflect a company’s own market assumptions.
Financial and non-financial assets and liabilities are classified based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement requires judgment, which may affect the valuation of the fair value of assets and liabilities and their placement within the fair value hierarchy levels.
The following tables summarize the valuation of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities that were accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis in accordance with the classifications provided above as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 (in thousands).
 Fair Value Measurements at
September 30, 2016 using
DescriptionLevel 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
Liabilities       
Oil and natural gas derivatives$
 $(13,977) $
 $(13,977)
Total$
 $(13,977) $
 $(13,977)
Fair Value Measurements at
December 31, 2015 using
Fair Value Measurements at
December 31, 2016 using
DescriptionLevel 1 Level 2 Level 3 TotalLevel 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
Assets       
Liabilities       
Oil and natural gas derivatives$
 $16,284
 $
 $16,284
$
 $(24,954) $
 $(24,954)
Total$
 $16,284
 $
 $16,284
$
 $(24,954) $
 $(24,954)
Additional disclosures related to derivative financial instruments are provided in Note 8.
Other Fair Value Measurements
At SeptemberJune 30, 20162017 and December 31, 2015,2016, the carrying values reported on the interim unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets for accounts receivable, prepaid expenses and other assets, accounts payable, accrued liabilities, royalties payable, amounts due to affiliates, advances from joint interest owners, amounts due to joint ventures income taxes payable and other current liabilities approximated their fair values due to their short-term maturities.
At SeptemberJune 30, 2016, the carrying value of borrowings under the Credit Agreement approximated its fair value as it is subject to short-term floating interest rates that reflect market rates available to the Company at the time and is classified at Level 2.
At September 30, 20162017 and December 31, 2015,2016, the fair value of the Notes was $413.1$592.3 million and $381.0$605.2 million, respectively, based on quoted market prices, which represent Level 1 inputs in the fair value hierarchy.


14

Table of Contents
Matador Resources Company and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -
UNAUDITED - CONTINUED

NOTE 10 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Processing, Transportation and Salt Water Disposal Commitments

Natural Gas and NGL Processing and Transportation CommitmentsEagle Ford
Effective September 1, 2012, the Company entered into a firm five-year natural gas processing and transportation agreement whereby the Company committed to transport the anticipated natural gas production from a significant portion of its Eagle Ford acreage in South Texas through the counterparty’s system for processing at the counterparty’s facilities. The agreement also includes firm transportation of the natural gas liquids extracted at the counterparty’s processing plant downstream for fractionation. After processing, the residue natural gas is purchased by the counterparty at the tailgate of its processing plant and further transported under its natural gas transportation agreements. The arrangement contains fixed processing and liquids transportation and fractionation fees, payable by the Company, and the revenue the Company receives for the residue natural gas varies with the quality of natural gas transported to the processing facilities and the contract period.
Under this agreement, if the Company does not meet 80% of the maximum thermal quantity transportation and processing commitments in a contract year, it will be required to pay a deficiency fee per MMBtu of natural gas deficiency. Any quantity in excess of the maximum MMBtu delivered in a contract year can be carried over to the next contract year for purposes of calculating the natural gas deficiency. During certain prior periods, the Company had an immaterial natural gas deficiency, and the counterparty to this agreement waived the deficiency fee. The Company’s remaining aggregate undiscounted minimum commitments under this agreement are $1.6 million at September 30, 2016. The Company paid $0.7$0.5 million and $1.6$0.8 million in processing and transportation fees under this agreement during the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20162017 and 2015,2016, respectively, and $2.4$1.0 million and $4.3$1.7 million in processing and transportation fees under this agreement during the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2017 and 2016, and 2015, respectively. The future undiscounted minimum payment under this agreement as of June 30, 2017 was $0.2 million.
Delaware Basin — Loving County, Texas Natural Gas Processing
In late 2015, the Company entered into a 15-year, fixed-fee natural gas gathering and processing agreement whereby the Company committed to deliver the anticipated natural gas production from a significant portion of its Loving County, Texas acreage in West Texas through the counterparty’s gathering system for processing at the counterparty’s facility.facilities. Under this agreement, if the Company does not meet the volume commitment for gatheringtransportation and processing at the facilityfacilities in a contract year, it will be required to pay a deficiency fee per MMBtu of natural gas deficiency. At the end of each year of the agreement, the Company can elect to have the previous year’s actual gatheringtransportation and processing volumes be the new minimum commitment for each of the remaining years of the contract. As such, the Company has the ability to unilaterally reduce the gathering and processing commitment if the Company’s production in the Loving County area is less than the Company’s currently projected production. If the Company ceased operations in this area at SeptemberJune 30, 2016,2017, the total deficiency fee required to be paid would be approximately $12.0$11.6 million. In addition, if the Company elects to reduce the gathering and processing commitment in any year, the Company has the ability to elect to increase the committed volumes in any future year to the originally agreed gathering and processing commitment. Any quantity in excess of the volume commitment delivered in a contract year can be carried over to the next contract year for purposes of calculating the natural gas deficiency. The Company paid approximately $2.4 million in processing and gathering fees under this agreement during the three months ended September 30, 2016 and $7.1 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2016. The Company can elect to either sell the residue gas to the counterparty at the tailgate of its processing plant or have the counterparty deliver to the Company the residue gas in-kind to be sold to third parties downstream of the plant.
Other Commitments
The Company does not own or operate its own drilling rigs, but instead enters into contracts with third parties for such rigs. These contracts establish daily rates for the drilling rigs and the term of the Company’s commitment for the drilling services to be provided, which have typically been for one year or less, although the Company has entered into longer-term contracts in order to secure new drilling rigs equipped with the latest technology in plays that were until recently experiencing heavy demand for drilling rigs. The Company would incur a termination obligation if the Company elected to terminate a contract and the drilling contractor were unable to secure work for the contracted drilling rigs or if the drilling contractor were unable to secure replacement work for the contracted drilling rigs at the same daily rates being charged to the Company prior to the end of their respective contract terms. The Company’s undiscounted minimum outstanding aggregate termination obligations under its drilling rig contracts were approximately $43.0 million at September 30, 2016.
The Company entered into an agreement in late 2015 with a third party for the engineering, procurement, construction and installation of a natural gas processing plant in the Rustler Breaks asset area in Eddy County, New Mexico. The plant was completed in the third quarter of 2016 and currently processes a portion of the Company’s natural gas produced from certain of its wells in the Delaware Basin. At September 30, 2016, total remaining commitments under this contract were $4.2 million, and the Company made payments totaling $1.4 million during the three months ended September 30, 2016 and $19.2 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2016.

1517

Matador Resources Company and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -
UNAUDITED - CONTINUED

NOTE 10 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES - Continued

contract year can be carried over to the next contract year for purposes of calculating the natural gas deficiency. The Company paid approximately $3.7 million and $2.8 million in natural gas processing and gathering fees under this agreement during the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and $6.8 million and $4.7 million in natural gas processing and gathering fees under this agreement during the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.The Company can elect to either sell the residue gas to the counterparty at the tailgate of its processing plants or have the counterparty deliver to the Company the residue gas in-kind to be sold to third parties downstream of the plants.
Delaware Basin — San Mateo
In connection with the Joint Venture, effective as of February 1, 2017, the Company dedicated its current and future leasehold interests in the Rustler Breaks and Wolf asset areas pursuant to 15-year, fixed-fee natural gas, oil and salt water gathering agreements and salt water disposal agreements. In addition, the Company dedicated its current and future leasehold interests in the Rustler Breaks asset area pursuant to a 15-year, fixed-fee natural gas processing agreement (collectively with the gathering and salt water disposal agreements, the “Operational Agreements”). The Joint Venture will provide the Company with firm service under each of the Operational Agreements in exchange for certain minimum volume commitments. The minimum contractual obligation under the Operational Agreements at June 30, 2017 was approximately $256.4 million.
Beginning in May 2017, a subsidiary of San Mateo entered into certain agreements with third parties for the engineering, procurement, construction and installation of an expansion of the Black River Processing Plant, including required compression. The expansion is expected to be placed into service in 2018. San Mateo’s total commitments under these agreements are $56.9 million. The subsidiary of San Mateo paid approximately $7.9 million and $9.9 million under these agreements during the three and six months ended June 30, 2017. As of June 30, 2017, the remaining obligations under these agreements were $47.0 million, which are expected to be incurred within the next year.
Other Commitments
The Company does not own or operate its own drilling rigs, but instead enters into contracts with third parties for such drilling rigs. These contracts establish daily rates for the drilling rigs and the term of the Company’s commitment for the drilling services to be provided, which have typically been for two years or less. The Company would incur a termination obligation if the Company elected to terminate a contract and if the drilling contractor were unable to secure replacement work for the contracted drilling rigs or if the drilling contractor were unable to secure replacement work for the contracted drilling rigs at the same daily rates being charged to the Company prior to the end of their respective contract terms. The Company’s undiscounted minimum outstanding aggregate termination obligations under its drilling rig contracts were approximately $42.0 million at June 30, 2017.
At SeptemberJune 30, 2016,2017, the Company had agreedoutstanding commitments to participate in the drilling and completion of various non-operated wells. If all of these wells are drilled and completed as proposed, the Company will have undiscountedCompany’s minimum outstanding aggregate commitments for its participation in these non-operated wells ofwere approximately $11.2$19.7 million at SeptemberJune 30, 2016, which the2017. The Company expects these costs to incurbe incurred within the next few months.year.
Legal Proceedings
The Company is a party to several lawsuits encountered in the ordinary course of its business. While the ultimate outcome and impact to the Company cannot be predicted with certainty, in the opinion of management, it is remote that these lawsuits will have a material adverse impact on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

18

Matador Resources Company and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -
UNAUDITED - CONTINUED

NOTE 11 - SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES


Accrued Liabilities
The following table summarizes the Company’s current accrued liabilities at SeptemberJune 30, 20162017 and December 31, 20152016 (in thousands).
September 30,
2016
 December 31, 2015June 30,
2017
 December 31, 2016
Accrued evaluated and unproved and unevaluated property costs$44,551
 $54,586
$98,589
 $54,273
Accrued support equipment and facilities costs14,990
 17,393
15,596
 15,139
Accrued lease operating expenses13,097
 7,743
12,613
 16,009
Accrued interest on debt12,741
 5,806
8,345
 6,541
Accrued asset retirement obligations29
 254
703
 915
Accrued partners’ share of joint interest charges5,646
 4,565
12,479
 5,572
Other2,285
 2,022
3,011
 3,011
Total accrued liabilities$93,339
 $92,369
$151,336
 $101,460
Supplemental Cash Flow Information
The following table provides supplemental disclosures of cash flow information for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20162017 and 20152016 (in thousands).
 Nine Months Ended 
 September 30,
 2016 2015
Cash paid for interest expense, net of amounts capitalized$13,370
 $2,617
Asset retirement obligations related to mineral properties$2,588
 $1,487
Asset retirement obligations related to support equipment and facilities$644
 $89
Decrease in liabilities for oil and natural gas properties capital expenditures$(7,849) $(30,282)
(Decrease) increase in liabilities for support equipment and facilities$(2,687) $2,525
Stock-based compensation expense recognized as liability$457
 $191
Transfer of inventory from oil and natural gas properties$655
 $586
 Six Months Ended 
 June 30,
 2017 2016
Cash paid for interest expense, net of amounts capitalized$15,875
 $12,226
Increase in asset retirement obligations related to mineral properties$1,978
 $2,511
(Decrease) increase in asset retirement obligations related to support equipment and facilities$(138) $75
Increase (decrease) in liabilities for oil and natural gas properties capital expenditures$43,797
 $(3,476)
Increase (decrease) in liabilities for support equipment and facilities$1,838
 $(11,565)
Stock-based compensation expense recognized as liability$(339) $88
(Decrease) increase in liabilities for accrued cost to issue equity$(343) $62
Transfer of inventory from oil and natural gas properties$(228) $474

1619

Table of Contents
Matador Resources Company and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -
UNAUDITED - CONTINUED

NOTE 12 - SEGMENT INFORMATION

The Company operates in two business segments: (i) exploration and production and (ii) midstream. The exploration and production segment is engaged in the acquisition, exploration and development of oil and natural gas properties and is currently focused primarily on the oil and liquids-rich portion of the Wolfcamp and Bone Spring plays in the Delaware Basin in Southeast New Mexico and West Texas. The Company also operates in the Eagle Ford shale play in South Texas and the Haynesville shale and Cotton Valley plays in Northwest Louisiana and East Texas. The midstream segment conducts midstream operations in support of the Company’s exploration, development and production operations and provides natural gas processing, natural gas, oil and salt water gathering services and salt water disposal services to third parties on a limited basis. As of February 17, 2017, substantially all of the Company’s midstream operations in the Rustler Breaks and Wolf asset areas in the Delaware Basin are conducted through San Mateo (see Note 3).
The following tables present selected financial information for the periods presented regarding the Company’s operatingbusiness segments on a stand-alone basis, corporate expenses that are not allocated to a segment and the consolidation and elimination entries necessary to arrive at the financial information for the Company on a consolidated basis (in thousands). On a consolidated basis, midstream services revenues consist primarily consist of those revenues from midstream operations related to third parties, including working interest owners in the Company’s operated wells. All midstream services revenues associated with Company-owned production are eliminated in consolidation. In evaluating the operating results of the exploration and production and midstream segments, the Company does not allocate certain expenses to the individual segments, including general and administrative expenses. Such expenses are reflected in the column labeled “Corporate.”
 Exploration and Production       Consolidated Company
  Midstream Corporate Eliminations 
Three Months Ended September 30, 2016         
Oil and natural gas revenues$82,794
 $285
 $
 $
 $83,079
Midstream services revenues
 5,609
 
 (4,043) 1,566
Realized gain on derivatives885
 
 
 
 885
Unrealized gain on derivatives3,203
 
 
 
 3,203
Expenses (1)
60,222
 2,277
 13,423
 (4,043) 71,879
Operating income (loss) (2)
$26,660
 $3,617
 $(13,423) $
 $16,854
Total Assets$1,020,648
 $124,153
 $32,892
 $
 $1,177,693
Capital Expenditures$116,279
 $17,370
 $1,903
 $
 $135,552
 Exploration and Production     Consolidations and Eliminations Consolidated Company
  Midstream Corporate  
Three Months Ended June 30, 2017         
Oil and natural gas revenues$113,387
 $377
 $
 $
 $113,764
Midstream services revenues
 11,367
 
 (9,268) 2,099
Realized gain on derivatives558
 
 
 
 558
Unrealized gain on derivatives13,190
 
 
 
 13,190
Expenses(1)
78,078
 5,960
 15,852
 (9,268) 90,622
Operating income (loss)(2)
$49,057
 $5,784
 $(15,852) $
 $38,989
Total assets$1,436,678
 $192,889
 $147,509
 $
 $1,777,076
Capital expenditures(3)
$165,583
 $27,347
 $1,752
 $
 $194,682
_____________________
(1) Expenses include depreciation, depletion and amortization expenses of $28.9 million, $0.8 million and $0.3 million for the exploration and production, midstream and corporate segments, respectively.
(2) Includes $116,000 in net income attributable to non-controlling interest in subsidiaries related to the midstream segment.
(1)Includes depletion, depreciation and amortization expenses of $39.6 million and $1.3 million for the exploration and production and midstream segments, respectively. Also includes corporate depletion, depreciation and amortization expenses of $0.4 million.
(2)Includes $3.2 million in net income attributable to non-controlling interest in subsidiaries related to the midstream segment.
(3)Includes $13.4 million in capital expenditures attributable to non-controlling interest in subsidiaries related to the midstream segment.

1720

Table of Contents
Matador Resources Company and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -
UNAUDITED - CONTINUED

NOTE 12 - SEGMENT INFORMATION - Continued


 Exploration and Production     Consolidations and Eliminations Consolidated Company
  Midstream Corporate  
Three Months Ended June 30, 2016         
Oil and natural gas revenues$68,864
 $472
 $
 $
 $69,336
Midstream services revenues
 3,469
 
 (2,551) 918
Realized gain on derivatives2,465
 
 
 
 2,465
Unrealized loss on derivatives(26,625) 
 
 
 (26,625)
Expenses(1)
134,338
 1,562
 13,356
 (2,551) 146,705
Operating (loss) income(2)
$(89,634) $2,379
 $(13,356) $
 $(100,611)
Total assets$927,557
 $106,425
 $52,106
 $
 $1,086,088
Capital expenditures$97,309
 $11,192
 $2,328
 $
 $110,829
_____________________
(1)Includes depletion, depreciation and amortization expenses of $30.6 million and $0.5 million for the exploration and production and midstream segments, respectively, and full-cost ceiling impairment expenses of $78.2 million for the exploration and production segment. Also includes corporate depletion, depreciation and amortization expenses of $0.2 million.
(2)Includes $106,000 in net income attributable to non-controlling interest in subsidiaries related to the midstream segment.
 Exploration and Production       Consolidated Company
  Midstream Corporate Eliminations 
Three Months Ended September 30, 2015         
Oil and natural gas revenues$71,665
 $150
 $
 $
 $71,815
Midstream services revenues
 3,886
 
 (3,317) 569
Realized gain on derivatives19,862
 
 
 
 19,862
Unrealized gain on derivatives6,733
 
 
 
 6,733
Expenses (1)
356,762
 1,964
 12,224
 (3,317) 367,633
Operating (loss) income (2)
$(258,502) $2,072
 $(12,224) $
 $(268,654)
Total Assets$1,169,283
 $83,089
 $28,150
 $
 $1,280,522
Capital Expenditures$77,990
 $12,219
 $315
 $
 $90,524
 Exploration and Production     Consolidations and Eliminations Consolidated Company
  Midstream Corporate  
Six Months Ended June 30, 2017         
Oil and natural gas revenues$227,552
 $1,059
 $
 $
 $228,611
Midstream services revenues
 20,983
 
 (17,329) 3,654
Realized loss on derivatives(1,661) 
 
 
 (1,661)
Unrealized gain on derivatives33,821
 
 
 
 33,821
Expenses(1)
146,416
 10,462
 31,608
 (17,329) 171,157
Operating income (loss)(2)
$113,296
 $11,580
 $(31,608) $
 $93,268
Total assets$1,436,678
 $192,889
 $147,509
 $
 $1,777,076
Capital expenditures(3)
$373,956
 $40,227
 $3,216
 $
 $417,399
_____________________
(1) Expenses include depreciation, depletion and amortization expenses of $44.6 million, $0.5 million and $0.1 million for the exploration and production, midstream and corporate segments, respectively, and full-cost ceiling impairment expense of $285.7 million for the exploration and production segment.
(2) Includes $45,000 in net income attributable to non-controlling interest in subsidiaries related to the midstream segment.
 Exploration and Production       Consolidated Company
  Midstream Corporate Eliminations 
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016         
Oil and natural gas revenues$195,467
 $874
 $
 $
 $196,341
Midstream services revenues
 11,168
 
 (8,212) 2,956
Realized gain on derivatives10,413
 
 
 
 10,413
Unrealized loss on derivatives(30,261) 
 
 
 (30,261)
Expenses (1)
327,585
 5,373
 40,089
 (8,212) 364,835
Operating (loss) income (2)
$(151,966) $6,669
 $(40,089) $
 $(185,386)
Total Assets$1,020,648
 $124,153
 $32,892
 $
 $1,177,693
Capital Expenditures$278,396
 $49,620
 $5,485
 $
 $333,501
_____________________
(1) Expenses include depreciation, depletion and amortization expenses of $87.9 million, $1.7 million and $0.6 million for the exploration and production, midstream and corporate segments, respectively, and full-cost ceiling impairment expense of $158.6 million for the exploration and production segment.
(2) Includes $209,000 in net income attributable to non-controlling interest in subsidiaries related to the midstream segment.
(1)Includes depletion, depreciation and amortization expenses of $72.1 million and $2.5 million for the exploration and production and midstream segments, respectively. Also includes corporate depletion, depreciation and amortization expenses of $0.7 million.
(2)Includes $5.1 million in net income attributable to non-controlling interest in subsidiaries related to the midstream segment.
(3)Includes $18.6 million in capital expenditures attributable to non-controlling interest in subsidiaries related to the midstream segment.

1821

Table of Contents
Matador Resources Company and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -
UNAUDITED - CONTINUED

NOTE 12 - SEGMENT INFORMATION - Continued


 Exploration and Production       Consolidated Company
  Midstream Corporate Eliminations 
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015         
Oil and natural gas revenues$221,768
 $360
 $
 $
 $222,128
Midstream services revenues
 8,294
 
 (6,910) 1,384
Realized gain on derivatives52,146
 
 
 
 52,146
Unrealized loss on derivatives(25,356) 
 
 
 (25,356)
Expenses (1)
798,044
 3,990
 38,823
 (6,910) 833,947
Operating (loss) income (2)
$(549,486) $4,664
 $(38,823) $
 $(583,645)
Total Assets$1,169,283
 $83,089
 $28,150
 $
 $1,280,522
Capital Expenditures$307,896
 $47,804
 $394
 $
 $356,094
 Exploration and Production     Consolidations and Eliminations Consolidated Company
  Midstream Corporate  
Six Months Ended June 30, 2016         
Oil and natural gas revenues$112,672
 $590
 $
 $
 $113,262
Midstream services revenues
 5,560
 
 (4,169) 1,391
Realized gain on derivatives9,528
 
 
 
 9,528
Unrealized loss on derivatives(33,464) 
 
 
 (33,464)
Expenses(1)
267,365
 3,096
 26,665
 (4,169) 292,957
Operating (loss) income(2)
$(178,629) $3,054
 $(26,665) $
 $(202,240)
Total assets$927,557
 $106,425
 $52,106
 $
 $1,086,088
Capital expenditures$162,116
 $32,250
 $3,582
 $
 $197,948
_____________________
(1)Includes depletion, depreciation and amortization expenses of $58.9 million and $1.0 million for the exploration and production and midstream segments, respectively, and full-cost ceiling impairment expenses of $158.6 million for the exploration and production segment. Also includes corporate depletion, depreciation and amortization expenses of $0.3 million.
(2)Includes $93,000 in net income attributable to non-controlling interest in subsidiaries related to the midstream segment.
(1) Expenses include depreciation, depletion and amortization expenses of $142.0 million, $1.2 million and $0.3 million for the exploration and production, midstream and corporate segments, respectively, and full-cost ceiling impairment expense of $581.9 million for the exploration and production segment.
(2) Includes $156,000 in net income attributable to non-controlling interest in subsidiaries related to the midstream segment.



Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our interim unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto contained herein and in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 20152016 (the “Annual Report”) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), along with Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contained in the Annual Report. The Annual Report is accessible on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov and on our website at www.matadorresources.com. Our discussion and analysis includes forward-looking information that involves risks and uncertainties and should be read in conjunction with the “Risk Factors” section of the Annual Report and the section entitled “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” below for information about the risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to be materially different than our forward-looking statements.
In this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the “Quarterly Report”), references to “we,” “our” or the “Company” refer to Matador Resources Company and its subsidiaries as a whole and references to “Matador” refer solely to Matador Resources Company.
For certain oil and natural gas terms used in this Quarterly Report, please see the “Glossary of Oil and Natural Gas Terms” included with the Annual Report.
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
Certain statements in this Quarterly Report constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act. Additionally, forward-looking statements may be made orally or in press releases, conferences, reports, on our website or otherwise, in the future by us or on our behalf. Such statements are generally identifiable by the terminology used such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “continue,” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “forecasted,” “hypothetical,” “intend,” “may,” “might,” “plan,” “potential,” “predict,” “project,” “should” or other similar words, although not all forward- lookingforward-looking statements contain such identifying words.
By their very nature, forward-looking statements require us to make assumptions that may not materialize or that may not be accurate. Forward-looking statements are subject to known and unknown risks and uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results, levels of activity and achievements to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such statements. Such factors include, among others: general economic conditions, changes in oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids prices and the demand for oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids, the success of our drilling program, the timing of planned capital expenditures, sufficientthe sufficiency of our cash flow from operations together with available borrowing capacity under our credit agreement,

uncertainties in estimating proved reserves and forecasting production results, operational factors affecting the commencement or maintenance of producing wells, the condition of the capital markets generally, as well as our ability to access them, the proximity to our properties and capacity of transportation facilities, availability of acquisitions, our ability to integrate acquisitions including the integration of Harvey E. Yates Company, with our business, weather and environmental conditions, uncertainties regarding environmental regulations or litigation and other legal or regulatory developments affecting our business, and the other factors discussed below and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report and in other documents that we file with or furnish to the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, all of which are difficult to predict. Forward-looking statements may include statements about:
our business strategy;
our reserves;
our technology;
our cash flows and liquidity;
our financial strategy, budget, projections and operating results;
our oil and natural gas realized prices;
the timing and amount of future production of oil and natural gas;
the availability of drilling and production equipment;
the availability of oil field labor;
the amount, nature and timing of capital expenditures, including future exploration and development costs;
the availability and terms of capital;
our drilling of wells;
our ability to negotiate and consummate acquisition and divestiture opportunities;
government regulation and taxation of the oil and natural gas industry;
our marketing of oil and natural gas;
our exploitation projects or property acquisitions;
the integration of acquisitions including the integration of Harvey E. Yates Company, with our business;

our ability and the ability of our midstream joint venture to construct and operate midstream facilities;facilities, including the expansion of our Black River cryogenic natural gas processing plant and the drilling of additional salt water disposal wells;
the ability of our midstream joint venture to attract third-party volumes;
our costs of exploiting and developing our properties and conducting other operations;
general economic conditions;
competition in the oil and natural gas industry;industry, including in both the exploration and production and midstream segments;
the effectiveness of our risk management and hedging activities;
environmental liabilities;
counterparty credit risk;
developments in oil-producing and natural gas-producing countries;
our future operating results;
estimated future reserves and the present value thereof; and
our plans, objectives, expectations and intentions contained in this Quarterly Report or in our other filings with the SEC that are not historical.
Although we believe that the expectations conveyed by the forward-looking statements in this Quarterly Report are reasonable based on information available to us on the date such forward-looking statements were made,hereof, no assurances can be given as to future results, levels of activity, achievements or financial condition.
You should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statement and should recognize that the statements are predictions of future results, which may not occur as anticipated. Actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements and from historical results, due to the risks and uncertainties described above, as well as others not now anticipated. The impact of any one factor on a particular forward-looking statement is not determinable with certainty as such factors are interdependent upon other factors. The foregoing statements are not exclusive and further information concerning us, including factors that potentially could materially affect our financial results, may emerge from time to time. We do not intend to update forward-looking statements to reflect actual results or changes in factors or assumptions affecting such forward-looking statements, except as required by law, including the securities laws of the United States and the rules and regulations of the SEC.
Overview
We are an independent energy company founded in July 2003 and engaged in the exploration, development, production and acquisition of oil and natural gas resources in the United States, with an emphasis on oil and natural gas shale and other unconventional plays. Our current operations are focused primarily on the oil and liquids-rich portion of the Wolfcamp and Bone Spring plays in the Delaware Basin in Southeast New Mexico and West Texas. We also operate in the Eagle Ford shale play in South Texas and the Haynesville shale and Cotton Valley plays in Northwest Louisiana and East Texas. Additionally, we conduct midstream operations, primarily through our midstream joint venture, San Mateo Midstream, LLC (“San Mateo” or the “Joint Venture”), in support of our exploration, development and production operations and provide natural gas processing, natural gas, oil and salt water gathering services and salt water disposal services to third parties on a limited basis.

ThirdSecond Quarter and Year-to-Date Highlights
Quarterly oil, natural gas and oil equivalent production results for the third quarter of 2016 were the best in our history. For the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2016,2017, our total oil equivalent production was 2.703.4 million BOE, and our average daily oil equivalent production was 29,38136,922 BOE per day, of which 14,96019,423 Bbl per day, or 51%53%, was oil and 86.5105.0 MMcf per day, or 49%47%, was natural gas. Our oil production of 1.381.77 million Bbl for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20162017 increased 19%44% year-over-year from 1.161.23 million Bbl for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2015.2016. Our natural gas production of 8.09.6 Bcf for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20162017 increased 7%21% year-over-year from 7.57.9 Bcf for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2015.
2016. For the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2016,2017, our total oil equivalent production was 7.426.3 million BOE, and our average daily oil equivalent production was 27,09134,972 BOE per day, of which 13,32218,876 Bbl per day, or 49%54%, was oil and 82.696.6 MMcf per day, or 51%46%, was natural gas. Our total oil equivalent production of 7.42 million BOE for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 increased 7% year-over-year from 6.94 million BOE for the nine months ended September 30, 2015. Our oil production of 3.653.4 million Bbl for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20162017 increased 6%50% year-over-year from 3.432.3 million Bbl for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2015.2016. Our natural gas production of 22.617.5 Bcf for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20162017 increased 7%19% year-over-year from 21.114.7 Bcf for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2015.
During the third quarter of 2016, our oil and natural gas revenues were $83.1 million, an increase of 16% from oil and natural gas revenues of $71.8 million during the third quarter of 2015. The increase in our oil and natural gas revenues was due to (i) the 19% increase in our oil production to 1.38 million Bbl in the third quarter of 2016, as compared to 1.16 million Bbl produced in the third quarter of 2015 and (ii) the 7% increase in our natural gas production to 8.0 Bcf in the third quarter of 2016, as compared to 7.5 Bcf produced in the third quarter of 2015. The increase in oil and natural gas production was primarily a result of our ongoing delineation and development drilling in the Delaware Basin, which offset declining production in the Eagle Ford and Haynesville shales where we have significantly reduced our activity since late 2014 and early 2015. This increase in oil and natural gas revenues was also partly attributable to the increase in the weighted average natural gas price to $3.08 per Mcf realized in the third quarter of 2016, as compared to the weighted average natural gas price of $2.90 per Mcf realized in the third quarter of 2015.2016.
For the thirdsecond quarter of 2016,2017, we reported net income attributable to Matador Resources Company shareholders of approximately $11.9$28.5 million, or $0.13$0.28 per diluted common share on a GAAP basis, as compared to a net loss attributable to Matador Resources Company shareholders of $242.1$105.9 million, or $(2.86)$1.15 per diluted common share, for the thirdsecond quarter of 2015.2016. For the thirdsecond quarter of 2016,2017, our Adjusted EBITDA attributable to Matador Resources Company shareholders (“Adjusted EBITDA”), a non-GAAP financial measure, was $72.7 million, as compared to Adjusted EBITDA of $38.9 million during the second quarter of 2016. For a definition of Adjusted EBITDA and a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to our net income (loss) and net cash provided by operating activities, see “— Liquidity and Capital Resources — Non-GAAP Financial

Measures.” For more information regarding our financial results for the second quarter of 2017, see “— Results of Operations” below.
For the six months ended June 30, 2017, we reported net income attributable to Matador Resources Company shareholders of approximately $72.5 million, or $0.72 per diluted common share on a GAAP basis, as compared to a net loss attributable to Matador Resources Company shareholders of $213.5 million, or $2.40 per diluted common share, for the six months ended June 30, 2016. For the six months ended June 30, 2017, our Adjusted EBITDA, a non-GAAP financial measure, was $47.3$142.6 million, a decrease of 19% fromas compared to Adjusted EBITDA of $58.0$56.1 million during the third quarter of 2015.six months ended June 30, 2016. For a definition of Adjusted EBITDA and a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to our net income (loss) and net cash provided by operating activities, see “— Liquidity and Capital Resources — Non-GAAP Financial Measures.” For more information regarding our financial results for 2016, see “— Results of Operations” below.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2016, our oil and natural gas revenues were $196.3 million, a decrease of 12% from oil and natural gas revenues of $222.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015. This decrease was attributable to a sharp decline in the weighted average oil and natural gas prices to $38.75 per Bbl and $2.43 per Mcf, respectively, realized in the nine months ended September 30, 2016 from weighted average oil and natural gas prices of $47.36 per Bbl and $2.83 per Mcf, respectively, realized in the nine months ended September 30, 2015. The decrease in our oil and natural gas revenues was mitigated by the 6% increase in our oil production to 3.65 million Bbl for the nine months ended September 30, 2016, as compared to 3.43 million Bbl produced for the nine months ended September 30, 2015, and by the 7% increase in our natural gas production to 22.6 Bcf for the nine months ended September 30, 2016, as compared to 21.1 Bcf for the nine months ended September 30, 2015. This increase in oil and natural gas production was attributable to the same operations noted above for the thirdsecond quarter of 2016.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2016, we reported a net loss of approximately $201.6 million, or $(2.24) per diluted common share on a GAAP basis, a decrease of 55%, as compared to a net loss of $449.4 million, or $(5.58) per diluted common share, for the nine months ended September 30, 2015. For the nine months ended September 30, 2016, our Adjusted EBITDA was $103.4 million, a decrease of 41% from Adjusted EBITDA of $174.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015. Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure. For a definition of Adjusted EBITDA and a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to our net income (loss) and net cash provided by operating activities, see “— Liquidity and Capital Resources — Non-GAAP Financial Measures.” For more information regarding our financial results for 2016,2017, see “— Results of Operations” below.
During the thirdsecond quarter of 2016,2017, we continued to operate threeour focus on the exploration, delineation and development of our Delaware Basin acreage in Loving County, Texas and Lea and Eddy Counties, New Mexico. We began 2017 operating four drilling rigs in the Delaware Basin asand continued to do so throughout the first quarter of 2017. In late April 2017, we have throughout 2016. In the third quarter and at November 1, 2016, one of these rigs was drilling in the Wolf asset area in Loving County, Texas, one was drilling in the Rustler Breaks asset area in Eddy County, New Mexico and one was drilling in the western portion of our Ranger asset area in Lea County, New Mexico. We contractedadded a fourthfifth drilling rig in late August 2016the Delaware Basin and expect to beginoperate five rigs in the Delaware Basin throughout the remainder of 2017, including three rigs in our Rustler Breaks and Antelope Ridge asset areas, one rig in our Wolf and Jackson Trust asset areas and one rig in our Ranger/Arrowhead and Twin Lakes asset areas. We expect to direct over 90% of our estimated 2017 capital expenditure budget (excluding capital expenditures related to acreage, mineral and seismic data acquisitions) to drilling and completion and midstream activities in the Delaware Basin. At June 30, 2017, we had incurred approximately $241 million, or 51%, of our first2017 capital expenditure budget of between $456 and $484 million (excluding capital expenditures related to acreage, mineral and seismic data acquisitions).
In July 2017, we took delivery of a sixth drilling rig on a temporary basis for the purpose of drilling a second salt water disposal well in the Rustler Breaks asset area. After this well is finished being drilled in early

November 2016, we intend to move thisarea for San Mateo. Upon delivery of the sixth drilling rig, to our Wolf asset area to drill a thirdthe salt water disposal well there. Although we had made no commitmentwas not ready to dospud, so at November 1, 2016,August 2, 2017, we are considering retaining the fourth drilling rig following the drilling of the Wolf salt water disposal well, and if so, we expect to movewere using this rig to drill an additional oil and natural gas well in our Rustler Breaks asset area in early December 2016 and begin operating two drilling rigs there.
We began producingarea. At August 2, 2017, we had no plans to use this sixth rig to drill additional oil and natural gas fromwells for the remainder of 2017.
We also finished drilling our five-well program in the Eagle Ford shale in South Texas during the second quarter of 2017. Two of these wells were completed and turned to sales in mid-June 2017. The other three wells were completed and turned to sales in early July 2017, and thus, did not contribute to second quarter 2017 production volumes. The rig used to drill these five wells was released in May 2017, and we have no additional operated drilling activities planned in the Eagle Ford shale for the remainder of 2017.
We completed and turned to sales a total of 1521 gross (8.4(14.2 net) wells in the Rustler Breaks and Wolf asset areasDelaware Basin during the thirdsecond quarter of 2016,2017, including nine16 gross (7.9(13.5 net) operated and sixfive gross (0.5(0.7 net) non-operated horizontal wells. Most of these wells were placed on production during August and September 2016 and, as a result, did not contribute fully to third quarter production volumes. In the Rustler Breaks asset area, we began producing oil and natural gas from a total of 1113 gross (4.6(8.2 net) wells during the thirdsecond quarter of 2016,2017, including fivenine gross (4.1(7.6 net) operated and sixfour gross (0.5(0.6 net) non-operated horizontal wells. Of the fivenine gross operated wells in the Rustler Breaks asset area, fourfive were Wolfcamp A-XY completions, and one was a lower Wolfcamp B (Blair Shale) completion. The six gross non-operated wells in the Rustler Breaks asset area included fourA-Lower completion and three were Wolfcamp B (Blair Shale) completions and two Second Bone SpringB-Blair completions. In addition, we began producing oil and natural gas from five gross (4.2 net) operated wells in the Wolf asset area during the second quarter of 2017, including one Wolfcamp A-XY completion and four Second Bone Spring completions. In the Ranger, Arrowhead and Twin Lakes asset areas, we began producing oil and natural gas from a total of one gross (3.8(0.1 net) non-operated well, one gross (0.7 net) operated well and one gross (1.0 net) operated well, respectively, during the second quarter of 2017. The well in the Arrowhead asset area, a Second Bone Spring completion, and the well in the Twin Lakes asset area, a Wolfcamp D completion, were the first operated horizontal wells at Wolf during the third quarter of 2016, including one Wolfcamp A-Y completion and three Second Bone Spring completions.we had tested in their respective asset areas.
As a result of our ongoing drilling and completion operations in these asset areas, our Delaware Basin production has continued to increase over the past twelve months. Our total Delaware Basin production for the thirdsecond quarter of 20162017 was 18,49827,622 BOE per day, consisting of 11,75116,645 Bbl of oil per day and 40.565.9 MMcf of natural gas per day, a 2.4-fold90% increase from production of 7,55114,525 BOE per day, consisting of 5,4899,789 Bbl of oil per day and 12.428.4 MMcf of natural gas per day, in the thirdsecond quarter of 2015.2016. The Delaware Basin contributed approximately 79%86% of our daily oil production and approximately 47%63% of our daily natural gas production in the thirdsecond quarter of 2016,2017, as compared to approximately 44%72% of our daily oil production and approximately 15%33% of our daily natural gas production in the thirdsecond quarter of 2015.2016.
In lateDuring the second quarter of 2017 and through August 2016,2, 2017, we successfully completedacquired approximately 8,300 net acres in the Delaware Basin, mostly in and began operating the Black River cryogenic natural gas processing plant builtaround our existing acreage positions, including new leasing activities, acquisitions of small interests from mineral and working interest owners in our Rustler Breaks asset area in Eddy County, New Mexico. The Black River processing plant has an inlet capacityoperated wells and acreage trades or term assignments with other operators. We incurred capital expenditures of approximately 60 MMcf$28.0 million to acquire this additional acreage throughout the Delaware Basin, as well as for new 3-D seismic data across portions of natural gas per day, which is almost twice the size of the previous cryogenic processing plant we built in our Wolf asset area in Loving County, Texas and subsequently sold to an affiliate of EnLink Midstream Partners, LP in October 2015. The Black River plant and associated gathering system was built to support our ongoing and future development efforts at Rustler Breaks and to provide us with priority one takeaway and processing services for our Rustler Breaks natural gas production. It should also provide additional income through the gathering and processing of third-party natural gas. The Black River plant was completed on time and on budget and, at November 1, 2016, had processed between 30 and 40 MMcf per day (on a gross basis) during its first two months in operation. We had previously completed the installation and testing of a 12-inch natural gas trunk line and associated gathering lines running throughout the length of our Rustler Breaks acreage position, and these natural gas gathering lines are being used to gather almost all of our natural gas production at Rustler Breaks.
On November 1, 2016, we adjusted our 2016 capital expenditure budget from $325.0 million to between $425.0 and $450.0 million, primarily to take advantage of a number of strategic lease and minerals acquisition opportunities as well as several new midstream initiatives in the Delaware Basin. More specifically, these changes in our capital budget should allow us (i) to take advantage of opportunities to make strategic additions to our Delaware Basin acreage and minerals position, particularly in the third and fourth quarters of 2016, as operational results have exceeded expectations and commodity prices have improved, (ii) to accelerate the timing of several important midstream projects originally planned forarea. At August 2, 2017, which add to our midstream asset base and (iii) to potentially add a fourth rig to our Delaware Basin drilling program in December 2016. Further, this estimated increase in our capital budget for 2016 does not include any additional funds allocated to drilling, completing and equipping wells in 2016. At September 30, 2016, we had incurred $333.5 million of our adjusted 2016 capital expenditure budget of between $425.0 and $450.0 million. For more information regarding our 2016 capital expenditure budget, see “— Liquidity and Capital Resources” below.
At December 31, 2015, we held approximately 157,100189,500 gross (88,800(108,000 net) leased acres in the Permian Basin in Southeast New Mexico and West Texas, primarily in

the Delaware Basin in Lea and Eddy Counties, New Mexico and Loving County, Texas. Between January 1, 2016 and October 31, 2016, we added approximately 10,600 gross (7,300 net) leased acres in Southeast New Mexico and West Texas, bringing our total Permian Basin acreage position at October 31, 2016 to approximately 165,500 gross (94,700 net) leased acres, almost all of which was located in the Delaware Basin. At October 31, 2016, we had sold approximately 600 net acres and allowed to expire approximately 800 net acres in non-core areas of the Permian Basin in 2016. During the third quarter of 2016, we also acquired mineral ownership in approximately 600 net acres in our Rustler Breaks and Ranger/Arrowhead asset areas. This brings our total acquired mineral ownership in the Delaware Basin since January 1, 2016 to approximately 7,900 gross (2,300 net) mineral acres. We plan to continue our leasing and acquisitionacquisitions efforts in the Delaware Basin during the remainder of 20162017 and may also considercontinue acquiring acreage in the Eagle Ford and Haynesville shales as strategic opportunities are identified.


Estimated Proved Reserves
The following table sets forth our estimated total proved oil and natural gas reserves at SeptemberJune 30, 2016,2017, December 31, 20152016 and SeptemberJune 30, 2015.2016. Our production and proved reserves are reported in two streams: oil and natural gas, including both dry and liquids-rich natural gas. Where we produce liquids-rich natural gas, such as in the Delaware Basin and the Eagle Ford shale, the economic value of the natural gas liquids associated with the natural gas is included in the estimated wellhead natural gas price on those properties where the natural gas liquids are extracted and sold. These reserves estimates were based on evaluations prepared by our engineering staff and have been audited for their reasonableness and conformance with SEC guidelines by Netherland, Sewell & Associates, Inc., independent reservoir engineers. These reserves estimates were prepared in accordance with the SEC’s rules for oil and natural gas reserves reporting. The estimated reserves shown are for proved reserves only and do not include any unproved reserves classified as probable or possible reserves that might exist for our properties, nor do they include any consideration that would be attributable to interests in unproved and unevaluated acreage beyond those tracts for which proved reserves have been estimated. Proved oil and natural gas reserves are quantities of oil and natural gas which geological and engineering data demonstrate with reasonable certainty to be recoverable in future years from known reservoirs under existing economic and operating conditions. Our total proved reserves are estimated using a conversion ratio of one Bbl of oil per six Mcf of natural gas.
September 30, 
 2016
 December 31,
2015
 September 30, 
 2015
June 30, 
 2017
 December 31,
2016
 June 30, 
 2016
Estimated Proved Reserves Data: (1) (2)
          
Estimated proved reserves:          
Oil (MBbl)(3)
55,031
 45,644
 42,531
74,954
 56,977
 52,337
Natural Gas (Bcf)(4)
279.4
 236.9
 267.5
356.5
 292.6
 258.7
Total (MBOE)(5)
101,604
 85,127
 87,109
134,373
 105,752
 95,457
Estimated proved developed reserves:          
Oil (MBbl)(3)
21,204
 17,129
 17,413
28,454
 22,604
 19,913
Natural Gas (Bcf)(4)
118.8
 101.4
 97.7
159.7
 126.8
 114.4
Total (MBOE)(5)
41,012
 34,037
 33,685
55,075
 43,731
 38,978
Percent developed40.4% 40.0% 38.7%41.0% 41.4% 40.8%
Estimated proved undeveloped reserves:          
Oil (MBbl)(3)
33,827
 28,515
 25,118
46,500
 34,373
 32,424
Natural Gas (Bcf)(4)
160.6
 135.5
 169.8
196.8
 165.9
 144.3
Total (MBOE)(5)
60,592
 51,090
 53,424
79,298
 62,021
 56,479
Standardized Measure(6) (in millions)
$516.8
 $529.2
 $673.8
$1,001.9
 $575.0
 $468.3
PV-10(7) (in millions)
$524.7
 $541.6
 $692.7
$1,086.9
 $581.5
 $473.2
_______________
(1)Numbers in table may not total due to rounding.
(2)Our estimated proved reserves, Standardized Measure and PV-10 were determined using index prices for oil and natural gas, without giving effect to derivative transactions, and were held constant throughout the life of the properties. The unweighted arithmetic averages of the first-day-of-the-month prices for the period from October 2015July 2016 through September 2016June 2017 were $38.17$45.42 per Bbl for oil and $2.28$3.01 per MMBtu for natural gas, for the period from January 20152016 through December 20152016 were $46.79$39.25 per Bbl for oil and $2.59$2.48 per MMBtu for natural gas and for the period from October 2014July 2015 through September 2015June 2016 were $55.73$39.63 per Bbl for oil and $3.06$2.24 per MMBtu for natural gas. These prices were adjusted by property for quality, energy content, regional price differentials, transportation fees, marketing deductions and other factors affecting the price received at the wellhead. We report our proved reserves in two streams, oil and natural gas, and the economic value of the natural gas liquids associated with the natural gas is included in the estimated wellhead natural gas price on those properties where the natural gas liquids are extracted and sold.
(3)One thousand barrels of oil.
(4)One billion cubic feet of natural gas.
(5)One thousand barrels of oil equivalent, estimated using a conversion ratio of one Bbl of oil per six Mcf of natural gas.

(6)Standardized Measure represents the present value of estimated future net cash flows from proved reserves, less estimated future development, production, plugging and abandonment costs and income tax expenses, discounted at 10% per annum to reflect the timing of future cash flows. Standardized Measure is not an estimate of the fair market value of our properties.
(7)PV-10 is a non-GAAP financial measure and generally differs from Standardized Measure, the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure, because it does not include the effects of income taxes on future net revenues. PV-10 is not an estimate of the fair market value of our properties. We and others in the industry use PV-10 as a measure to compare the relative size and value of proved reserves held by companies and of the potential return on investment related to the companies’ properties without regard to the specific tax characteristics of such entities. Our PV-10 at SeptemberJune 30, 2017, December 31, 2016

December 31, 2015 and September 30, 2015 and June 30, 2016 may be reconciled to the Standardized Measure of discounted future net cash flows at such dates by reducing our PV-10 by the discounted future income taxes associated with such reserves. The discounted future income taxes at June 30, 2017, December 31, 2016 and June 30, 2016 were $85.0 million, $6.5 million and $4.9 million, respectively.
At June 30, 2017, our estimated total proved oil and natural gas reserves were 134.4 million BOE, including 75.0 million Bbl of oil and 356.5 Bcf of natural gas, with a Standardized Measure of discounted future net cash flows at such dates by reducing our$1,001.9 million and a PV-10, by the discounted future income taxes associated with such reserves. The discounted future income taxes at September 30, 2016,a non-GAAP financial measure, of $1,086.9 million. At December 31, 20152016, our estimated total proved oil and September 30, 2015natural gas reserves were in millions, $7.9, $12.4105.8 million BOE, including 57.0 million Bbl of oil and $18.9, respectively.
At September292.6 Bcf of natural gas, and at June 30, 2016, our estimated total proved oil and natural gas reserves were 101.695.5 million BOE, an all-time high, including 55.052.3 million Bbl of oil and 279.4 Bcf of natural gas, with a Standardized Measure of $516.8 million and a PV-10, a non-GAAP financial measure, of $524.7 million. At December 31, 2015, our estimated total proved oil and natural gas reserves were 85.1 million BOE, including 45.6 million Bbl of oil and 236.9 Bcf of natural gas, and at September 30, 2015, our estimated total proved oil and natural gas reserves were 87.1 million BOE, including 42.5 million Bbl of oil and 267.5258.7 Bcf of natural gas. Our proved oil reserves of 55.075.0 million Bbl at SeptemberJune 30, 2016, also an all-time high,2017 increased 21%32%, as compared to 45.657.0 million Bbl at December 31, 2015,2016, and increased 29%43%, as compared to 42.552.3 million Bbl at SeptemberJune 30, 2015.2016. At SeptemberJune 30, 2016,2017, approximately 40%41% of our total proved reserves were proved developed reserves, 54%56% of our total proved reserves were oil and 46%44% of our total proved reserves were natural gas.
As a result of our drilling, completion and delineation activities in West Texas and Southeast New Mexico and West Texas since 2014, our Delaware Basin oil and natural gas reserves have become a more significant component of our total oil and natural gas reserves. Our estimated Delaware Basin proved oil and natural gas reserves have increased 87%63% from 39.666.2 million BOE at SeptemberJune 30, 2015,2016, or 46%69% of our total proved oil and natural gas reserves, including 25.640.3 million Bbl of oil and 84.0155.3 Bcf of natural gas, to 74.0108.1 million BOE, or 73%80% of our total proved oil and natural gas reserves, including 44.164.9 million Bbl of oil and 179.3259.2 Bcf of natural gas, at SeptemberJune 30, 2016.2017.
There have been no changes to the technology we used to establish reserves or to our internal control over the reserves estimation process from those set forth in the Annual Report.
Critical Accounting Policies
There have been no changes to our critical accounting policies and estimates from those set forth in the Annual Report.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
See Note 2 to the interim unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements in this Quarterly Report for the Company’s adoption of a new accounting pronouncement in the second quarter of 2016 and for a summary of recent accounting pronouncements that we believe may have an impact on our financial statements upon adoption.

Results of Operations
Revenues
The following table summarizes our unaudited revenues and production data for the periods indicated:
Three Months Ended 
 September 30,
 Nine Months Ended 
 September 30,
Three Months Ended 
 June 30,
 Six Months Ended 
 June 30,
2016 2015 2016 20152017 2016 2017 2016
Operating Data:              
Revenues (in thousands):(1)
              
Oil$58,589
 $50,173
 $141,437
 $162,424
$81,322
 $52,691
 $164,958
 $82,849
Natural gas24,490
 21,642
 54,904
 59,704
32,442
 16,645
 63,653
 30,413
Total oil and natural gas revenues83,079
 71,815
 196,341
 222,128
113,764
 69,336
 228,611
 113,262
Third-party midstream services revenues(2)1,566
 569
 2,956
 1,384
2,099
 918
 3,654
 1,391
Realized gain on derivatives885
 19,862
 10,413
 52,146
Realized gain (loss) on derivatives558
 2,465
 (1,661) 9,528
Unrealized gain (loss) on derivatives3,203
 6,733
 (30,261) (25,356)13,190
 (26,625) 33,821
 (33,464)
Total revenues$88,733
 $98,979
 $179,449
 $250,302
$129,611
 $46,094
 $264,425
 $90,717
Net Production Volumes:(1)
              
Oil (MBbl)(2)(3)
1,376
 1,161
 3,650
 3,429
1,767
 1,230
 3,417
 2,274
Natural gas (Bcf)(3)(4)
8.0
 7.5
 22.6
 21.1
9.6
 7.9
 17.5
 14.7
Total oil equivalent (MBOE)(4)(5)
2,703
 2,405
 7,423
 6,941
3,360
 2,550
 6,330
 4,720
Average daily production (BOE/d)(5)(6)
29,381
 26,137
 27,091
 25,427
36,922
 28,022
 34,972
 25,934
Average Sales Prices:              
Oil, without realized derivatives (per Bbl)$42.57
 $43.21
 $38.75
 $47.36
$46.01
 $42.84
 $48.28
 $36.43
Oil, with realized derivatives (per Bbl)$43.18
 $57.90
 $40.63
 $59.61
$46.34
 $43.29
 $47.97
 $39.08
Natural gas, without realized derivatives (per Mcf)$3.08
 $2.90
 $2.43
 $2.83
$3.40
 $2.10
 $3.64
 $2.07
Natural gas, with realized derivatives (per Mcf)$3.08
 $3.28
 $2.58
 $3.31
$3.39
 $2.34
 $3.61
 $2.31
_________________
(1)We report our production volumes in two streams: oil and natural gas, including both dry and liquids-rich natural gas. Revenues associated with extracted natural gas liquids are included with our natural gas revenues.
(2)Reclassified from other income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 due to the midstream segment becoming a reportable segment.
(3)One thousand barrels of oil.
(3)(4)One billion cubic feet of natural gas.
(4)(5)One thousand barrels of oil equivalent, estimated using a conversion ratio of one Bbl of oil per six Mcf of natural gas.
(5)(6)Barrels of oil equivalent per day, estimated using a conversion ratio of one Bbl of oil per six Mcf of natural gas.
Three Months Ended SeptemberJune 30, 20162017 as Compared to Three Months Ended SeptemberJune 30, 20152016
Oil and natural gas revenues. Our oil and natural gas revenues increased $11.3$44.4 million to $83.1$113.8 million, or an increase of 16%64%, for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2016,2017, as compared to $71.8$69.3 million for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2015.2016. Our oil revenues increased $8.4$28.6 million, or 17%54%, to $58.681.3 million for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20162017, as compared to $50.252.7 million for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20152016. The increase in oil revenues was primarilyresulted from an(i) a higher weighted average oil price realized for the three months ended June 30, 2017 of $46.01 per Bbl, as compared to $42.84 per Bbl realized for the three months ended June 30, 2016, and (ii) the 44% increase in oil production of 19% to 1.381.77 million Bbl of oil for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2016,2017, or about 14,96019,423 Bbl of oil per day, as compared to 1.161.23 million Bbl of oil, or about 12,61713,516 Bbl of oil per day, for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2015.2016. The increase in oil production wasis primarily a result ofattributable to our ongoing delineation and development drilling activities in the Delaware Basin, which offset declining oil production in the Eagle Ford shale where we have not drilled any new operated wells since the second quarter of 2015. The increase in oil revenues was partially offset by a lower weighted average oil price realized for the three months ended September 30, 2016 of $42.57 per Bbl, as compared to $43.21 per Bbl realized for the three months ended September 30, 2015.Basin. Our natural gas revenues increased by $2.8$15.8 million, or 13%95%, to $24.5$32.4 million for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2016,2017, as compared to $21.6$16.6 million for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2015.2016. The increase in natural gas revenues resulted from (i) a higher weighted average natural gas price realized for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20162017 of $3.08$3.40 per Mcf, as compared to $2.90$2.10 per Mcf realized for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2015,2016, and (ii) the 7%21% increase in our natural gas production to 8.09.6 Bcf for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2016,2017, as compared to 7.57.9 Bcf for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2015.2016. The increasedincrease in natural gas production was primarily attributable to our ongoing delineation and development drilling activities in the Delaware Basin, which offset declining natural gas production in the Eagle Ford and Haynesville shales where we have significantly reduced our activity since late 2014 and early 2015.Basin.

Third-party midstream services revenues. During the third quarter of 2016, our midstream operations became a reportable business segment under U.S. GAAP. Thus, we reportedOur third-party midstream services revenues separately for the first time in our unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations. Third-party midstream services revenues are primarily those revenues from midstream operations relatedincreased to third parties, including working interest owners in our operated wells; all midstream services revenues associated with Company-owned production are eliminated in consolidation. Our midstream services revenues from third-parties increased $1.0 million to $1.6$2.1 million, or an increase of 175%129%, for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2016,2017, as compared to $0.6$0.9 million for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2015.2016. This increase iswas primarily attributable to a significant increase in third-party salt water being disposed of atnatural gas gathering and processing revenues to approximately $1.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017, as compared to $0.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016, due to (i) our commercial facilities in the Wolf asset areanatural gas gathering system and to the Black River cryogenic natural gas processing plant becoming operational(the “Black River Processing Plant”) in late August 2016. Prior to this time, we had no significant midstream services revenues attributable tothe Rustler Breaks asset area being placed into service in the second half of 2016 and (ii) increased natural gas processing plant operations.production in our Wolf asset area.
Realized gain on derivatives. Our realized net gain on derivatives was $0.9$0.6 million for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2016,2017, as compared to a realized net gain of $19.9$2.5 million for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2015.2016. We realized a net gain of $0.6 million from our oil derivative contracts for the three months ended June 30, 2017, resulting from oil prices below the floor prices of certain of our oil costless collar contracts. We realized net gains of $0.8$0.6 million and $48,500$1.9 million from our oil and natural gas derivative contracts, respectively, for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2016. For the three months ended September 30, 2015, we realized net gains of $17.1 million, $2.2 million and $0.6 million attributable to our2016, resulting from oil natural gas and natural gas liquids (“NGL”) derivative contracts, respectively. The realized gains onprices below the floor prices of the majority of our oil and natural gas derivativecostless collar contracts. We realized an average gain of approximately $0.47 per Bbl hedged on all of our open oil costless collar contracts during the respective periodsthree months ended June 30, 2017, as compared to an average gain of $0.81 per Bbl hedged for the three months ended June 30, 2016. Our oil volumes hedged for the three months ended June 30, 2017 were attributable78% higher as compared to commodity prices being below the floor pricesthree months ended June 30, 2016. We realized an average gain of certainapproximately $0.65 per MMBtu hedged on all of our oil andopen natural gas costless collar contracts for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2016 and 2015. The realized gain on our NGL derivative contracts during the three months ended September 30, 2015 resulted from NGL prices that were lower than the fixed prices of our NGL swap contracts; we had no open NGL derivative contracts in 2016. The average floor prices of our oil costless collar contracts were $42.48 per Bbl and $67.11 per Bbl for the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The average ceiling prices of our oil costless collar contracts were $61.16 per Bbl and $84.60 per Bbl for the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The average floor prices of our natural gas costless collar contracts were $2.60 per MMBtu and $3.26 per MMBtu for the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The average ceiling prices of our natural gas costless collar contracts were $3.53 per MMBtu and $3.94 per MMBtu for the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Our total oil and natural gas volumes hedged for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20162017 were 15% lower and 31% lower, respectively,109% higher than the total oil and natural gas volumes hedged for the same period in 2015.three months ended June 30, 2016.
Unrealized gain (loss) on derivatives. Our unrealized net gain on derivatives was $3.213.2 million for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20162017, as compared to an unrealized gainnet loss of $6.726.6 million for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20152016. During the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2017, the aggregate net fair value of our open oil and natural gas derivative contracts increased to an asset of approximately $8.9 million from a liability of $4.3 million at March 31, 2017, resulting in an unrealized net gain on derivatives of $13.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017. During the three months ended June 30, 2016, the aggregate net fair value of our open oil and natural gas derivative contracts increaseddecreased to a liability of $14.0 million from a liability of $17.2 million from an asset of $9.4 million at June 30,March 31, 2016, resulting in an unrealized gainloss on derivatives of $3.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2016. During the three months ended September 30, 2016, the net fair value of our open oil derivative contracts increased by $2.0 million, and the net fair value of our open natural gas derivative contracts increased by $1.2 million. During the three months ended September 30, 2015, the aggregate net fair value of our open oil, natural gas and NGL derivative contracts increased to an asset of $30.2 million from $23.5 million at June 30, 2015, resulting in an unrealized gain on derivatives of $6.7$26.6 million for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2015.2016.
NineSix Months Ended SeptemberJune 30, 20162017 as Compared to NineSix Months Ended SeptemberJune 30, 20152016
Oil and natural gas revenues. Our oil and natural gas revenues decreased by approximately $25.8increased $115.3 million to $228.6 million, or 12%102%, for the six months ended June 30, 2017, as compared to $196.3$113.3 million for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2016,2016. Our oil revenues increased $82.1 million, or 99%, to $165.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017, as compared to $222.1$82.8 million for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2015. Our oil revenues decreased by 13% to $141.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016, as compared to $162.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015.2016. The decreaseincrease in oil revenues resulted primarily from (i) a lowerhigher weighted average oil price realized for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20162017 of $38.75$48.28 per Bbl, as compared to $47.36$36.43 per Bbl realized for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2015. Our2016, and (ii) the 50% increase in oil production increased by 6% to 3.653.42 million Bbl forof oil in the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2016,2017, or about 13,32218,876 Bbl of oil per day, as compared to 3.432.27 million Bbl of oil, or about 12,56212,495 Bbl of oil per day, forin the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2015. The increase in2016. This increased oil production wasis primarily a result ofattributable to our ongoing delineation and development drilling activities in the Delaware Basin, which offset declining oil production in the Eagle Ford shale where we have not drilled any new operated wells since the second quarter of 2015.Basin. Our natural gas revenues decreasedincreased by $4.8$33.2 million, or 8%109%, to $54.9$63.7 million for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2016,2017, as compared to $59.7$30.4 million for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2015. Our2016. The increase in natural gas revenues resulted from (i) a higher weighted average natural gas price realized for the six months ended June 30, 2017 of $3.64 per Mcf, as compared to $2.07 per Mcf realized for the six months ended June 30, 2016, and (ii) the 19% increase in our natural gas production increased by 7% to 22.617.5 Bcf for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2016,2017, as compared to 21.114.7 Bcf for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2015.2016. The increase in natural gas production was primarily attributable to increased natural gas production associated with our operationsongoing delineation and development drilling activities in the Delaware Basin and new, non-operated Haynesville shale wells completed and placed on production on our Elm Grove properties in Northwest Louisiana during the latter half of 2015 and into 2016. This production increase was more than offset by a lower weighted average natural gas price of $2.43 per Mcf realized during the nine months ended September 30, 2016, as compared to a weighted average natural gas price of $2.83 per Mcf realized during the nine months ended September 30, 2015.Basin.

Third-party midstream services revenues. Our third-party midstream services revenues from third parties increased $1.6 million to $3.0$3.7 million, or an increase of 114%163%, for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2016,2017, as compared to $1.4 million for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2015.2016. This isincrease was primarily attributable toa significant increase in third-party salt water being disposed of atnatural gas gathering and processing revenues to approximately $2.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017, as compared to $0.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016, due to (i) our commercial facilities in the Wolf asset areanatural gas gathering system and to the Black River Processing Plant in the Rustler Breaks asset area being placed into service in the second half of 2016 and (ii) increased natural gas processing plant becoming operationalproduction in late August 2016. Prior to this time, we had no significant midstream services revenues attributable to natural gas processing plant operations.our Wolf asset area.
Realized gain (loss) on derivatives. WeOur realized a gainnet loss on derivatives of approximately $10.4was $1.7 million for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2016,2017, as compared to a net gain of approximately $52.1$9.5 million for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2015. For the nine months ended September 30, 2016, we2016. We realized net gainslosses of approximately $6.9$1.1 million and $3.6$0.6 million attributable tofrom our oil and natural gas derivative contracts, respectively. Forrespectively, for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2015, we realized net gains of approximately $42.0 million, $8.5 million and $1.6 million attributable to our oil, natural gas and NGL derivative contracts, respectively. The net gain realized from our derivative contracts for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 resulted2017, resulting from oil and natural gas prices that were belowabove the floorceiling prices of certain of our oil and natural gas costless collar contracts. We realized net gains of $6.0 million and $3.5 million from our oil and natural gas derivative contracts. The averagecontracts, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2016, resulting from oil and natural gas prices below the floor prices of the majority of our oil and natural gas costless collar contracts. We realized an average loss of approximately $0.48 per Bbl hedged on all of our open oil costless collar contracts were $43.17during the six months ended June 30, 2017, as compared to an average gain of $5.11 per Bbl and $71.77 per Bblhedged for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The2016. Our oil volumes hedged for the three months ended June 30, 2017 were 86% higher as

compared to the six months ended June 30, 2016. We realized an average ceiling pricesloss of approximately $0.05 per MMBtu hedged on all of our oil costless collar contracts were $63.04 per Bbl and $89.04 per Bbl for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The average floor prices of ouropen natural gas costless collar contracts were $2.61during the six months ended June 30, 2017, as compared to an average gain of approximately $0.61 per MMBtu and $3.42 per MMBtu for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The average ceiling priceshedged on all of our open natural gas costless collar contracts were $3.55 per MMBtu and $4.19 per MMBtu for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.2016. Our total oil and natural gas volumes hedged for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20162017 were 2% lower and 35% lower, respectively,102% higher than the total oil and natural gas volumes hedged for the same period in 2015.six months ended June 30, 2016.
Unrealized lossgain (loss) on derivatives. Our unrealized lossgain on derivatives was approximately $30.3$33.8 million for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2016,2017, as compared to an unrealized loss of approximately $25.4$33.5 million for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2015.2016. During the period from December 31, 2016 through June 30, 2017, the aggregate net fair value of our open oil and natural gas derivative contracts increased from a liability of approximately $25.0 million to an asset of approximately $8.9 million, resulting in an unrealized gain on derivatives of approximately $33.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017. This gain is primarily attributable to the decrease in oil and natural gas futures prices during the six months ended June 30, 2017. During the period from December 31, 2015 through SeptemberJune 30, 2016, the aggregate net fair value of our open oil and natural gas derivative contracts decreased from an asset of approximately $16.3 million to a liability of approximately $14.0$17.2 million, resulting in an unrealized loss on derivatives of approximately $30.3$33.5 million for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2016. During the period from December 31, 2014 through September 30, 2015, the aggregate net fair value of our open oil, natural gas and NGL derivative contracts decreased from $55.5 million to $30.2 million, resulting in an unrealized loss on derivatives of $25.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015.










Expenses
The following table summarizes our unaudited operating expenses and other income (expense) for the periods indicated:
Three Months Ended 
 September 30,
 Nine Months Ended 
 September 30,
 Three Months Ended 
 June 30,
 Six Months Ended 
 June 30,
(In thousands, except expenses per BOE)2016 2015 2016 2015 2017 2016 2017 2016
Expenses:               
Production taxes, transportation and processing$12,388
 $9,426
 $30,846
 $26,734
 $12,875
 $10,556
 $24,682
 $18,459
Lease operating(1)14,605
 13,466
 41,300
 40,140
 16,040
 12,183
 31,797
 26,695
Plant and other midstream services operating1,449
 1,450
 3,537
 2,772
 2,942
 1,061
 5,283
 2,088
Depletion, depreciation and amortization30,015
 45,237
 90,185
 143,477
 41,274
 31,248
 75,266
 60,170
Accretion of asset retirement obligations276
 182
 828
 427
 314
 289
 614
 552
Full-cost ceiling impairment
 285,721
 158,633
 581,874
 
 78,171
 
 158,633
General and administrative13,146
 12,151
 39,506
 38,523
 17,177
 13,197
 33,515
 26,360
Total expenses$71,879
 $367,633
 $364,835
 $833,947
 $90,622
 $146,705
 $171,157
 $292,957
Operating income (loss)$16,854
 $(268,654) $(185,386) $(583,645) $38,989
 $(100,611) $93,268
 $(202,240)
Other income (expense):               
Net gain (loss) on asset sales and inventory impairment$1,073
 $
 $3,140
 $(97) 
Net gain on asset sales and inventory impairment$
 $1,002
 $7
 $2,067
Interest expense(6,880) (7,229) (20,244) (15,168) (9,224) (6,167) (17,679) (13,365)
Other (expense) income(141) 564
 (17) 637
 
Other income (2)
1,922
 29
 1,991
 124
Total other expense$(5,948) $(6,665) $(17,121) $(14,628) $(7,302) $(5,136) $(15,681) $(11,174)
Income (loss) before income taxes$10,906
 $(275,319) $(202,507) $(598,273) 
Total income tax benefit(1,141) (33,305) (1,141) (149,045) 
Net income (loss)$31,687
 $(105,747) $77,587
 $(213,414)
Net income attributable to non-controlling interest in subsidiaries(116) (45) (209) (156) (3,178) (106) (5,094) (93)
Net income (loss) attributable to Matador Resources Company shareholders$11,931
 $(242,059) $(201,575) $(449,384) $28,509
 $(105,853) $72,493
 $(213,507)
Expenses per BOE:               
Production taxes, transportation and processing$4.58
 $3.92
(1) 
$4.16
 $3.85
(2) 
$3.83
 $4.14
 $3.90
 $3.91
Lease operating$5.40
 $5.60
(3) 
$5.56
 $5.78
(4) 
Lease operating (1)
$4.77
 $4.78
 $5.02
 $5.66
Plant and other midstream services operating$0.54
 $0.60
 $0.48
 $0.40
 $0.88
 $0.42
 $0.83
 $0.44
Depletion, depreciation and amortization$11.10
 $18.81
 $12.15
 $20.67
 $12.28
 $12.25
 $11.89
 $12.75
General and administrative$4.86
 $5.05
 $5.32
 $5.55
 $5.11
 $5.18
 $5.29
 $5.58
_________________________________________
(1)$0.061.1 million, or $0.42 per BOE, reclassified to third-party midstream services revenues due to the midstream segment becoming a reportable segment in the third quarter of 2016.
(2)$0.02and $2.1 million, or $0.44 per BOE, reclassified to third-party midstream services revenues due to the midstream segment becoming a reportable segment in the third quarter of 2016.
(3)$0.60 per BOEwas reclassified to plant and other midstream services operating expenses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, respectively, due to theour midstream segmentbusiness becoming a reportable segment in the third quarter of 2016.segment.
(4)(2)$0.40 per BOE0.9 million and $1.4 million was reclassified to plant and other midstream services operating expensesrevenues for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, respectively, due to theour midstream segmentbusiness becoming a reportable segment in the third quarter of 2016.segment.
Three Months Ended SeptemberJune 30, 20162017 as Compared to Three Months Ended SeptemberJune 30, 20152016
Production taxes, transportation and processing. Our production taxes, transportation and processing expenses increased by $3.0$2.3 million to $12.4$12.9 million,, or an increase of 31%22%, for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2016,2017, as compared to $9.4$10.6 million for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2015. On a unit-of-production basis, our production taxes, transportation and processing expenses increased by 17% to $4.58 per BOE for the three months ended September 30, 2016, as compared to $3.92 per BOE for the three months ended September 30, 2015.2016. The increase in production taxes, transportation and processing expenses was primarily attributable to higherthe increase in our production taxes resulting from increased oil and natural gas revenues between the comparable periods andof $3.1 million to higher natural gas transportation and processing expenses of $7.3$6.9 million for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2016,2017, as compared to $3.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016, primarily due to the 64% increase in oil and natural gas revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2017, as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2016. In addition, the production tax rates in New Mexico are higher than production tax rates in Texas. As more of our oil and natural gas production becomes attributable to New Mexico, we expect to continue to experience increased production tax expenses. The increased production taxes were partially offset by a decrease in transportation and processing expenses. Transportation and processing expenses ofdecreased to $5.9 million for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2015.2017, as compared to transportation and processing expenses of $6.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016. This increasedecrease of $1.5$0.8 million was primarily due to the increasestart-up in natural gas production inlate August 2016 of the Delaware Basin as a percentage o

f our total natural gas production for the three months ended September 30, 2016, as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2015. Natural gas transportation and processing expenses are higher in the Delaware Basin, as compared to the Eagle Ford shale, as the natural gas gathering and processing infrastructure has yet to meet the demand for these services due to the increased drilling activity in the Delaware Basin over the last few years. We have begun to incur lower processing expenses forBlack River Processing Plant, which processes most of the natural gas produced in our Rustler Breaks asset area in Eddy County, New Mexico, due toand the start up34% decrease in late August 2016 of the cryogenic natural gas production between the two periods in Northwest Louisiana and East Texas where our transportation and processing plant we constructed in the Rustler Breaks asset area,charges are highest on a unit-of-production basis. On a unit-of-production basis, our production taxes, transportation and we expect to fully realize the impact of these lower processing expenses once the plant is operational for an entire quarter.
Our production taxes increased by $1.2 milliondecreased 7% to $4.6 million$3.83 per BOE for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2016,2017, as

compared to $3.4 million$4.14 per BOE for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2015, primarily due to the 16% increase in2016. On a unit‑of-production basis, these second quarter 2017 expenses benefited from significantly higher total oil and natural gas revenuesequivalent production, which increased 32% in the thirdsecond quarter of 20162017, as compared to the thirdsecond quarter of 2015.2016.
Lease operating. Our lease operating expenses increased by $1.1$3.9 million to $14.6$16.0 million, or an increase of 8%32%, for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2016,2017, as compared to $13.5$12.2 million for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2015.2016. Our lease operating expenses per unit of production decreased 4% to $5.40on a unit-of-production basis remained consistent at $4.77 per BOE for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2016,2017, as compared to $5.60$4.78 per BOE for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2015.2016. Our total oil equivalent production increased 32% to approximately 3.4 million BOE for the three months ended June 30, 2017 from approximately 2.6 million BOE for the three months ended June 30, 2016. The decrease achievedincrease in lease operating expenses on a unit-of-productionan absolute basis was attributable to several key factors, including (i) decreased field supervisory costs as a number of third-party contractors became full-time employees duringfor the second quarter of 2016, (ii) decreased chemical costs associated with our Eagle Ford operations, (iii) decreased water disposal costs attributable to our own salt water disposal facilities in the Wolf asset area, as well as new water disposal agreements negotiated with third parties, (iv) decreased supervisory and chemical costs associated with our Eagle Ford operations and (v) increased oil equivalent productionthree months ended June 30, 2017, as compared to the same periodthree months ended June 30, 2016, was primarily attributable to an increase in 2015.costs of services and equipment related to the increased number of wells at June 30, 2017, as compared to June 30, 2016, as a result of our increased delineation and development activities in the Delaware Basin.
Plant and other midstream services operating. Our plant and other midstream services operating expenses remained flat at $1.45increased by $1.9 million to $2.9 million, an increase of 177%, for the three months ended June 30, 2017, as compared to $1.1 million for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2016, as compared2016. This increase was partially attributable to $1.45the expenses associated with our salt water disposal operations of $1.5 million for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2015.2017, as compared to $0.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016, as a result of additional salt water disposal wells operating in the second quarter of 2017. Most of the remaining increase was attributable to expenses of $0.8 million associated with the Black River Processing Plant, which began operating in August 2016.
Depletion, depreciation and amortization. Our depletion, depreciation and amortization expenses decreasedincreased by $15.2$10.0 million to $30.0$41.3 million, or a decreasean increase of 34%32%, for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2016,2017, as compared to $45.2$31.2 million for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2015.2016. On a unit-of-production basis, our depletion, depreciation and amortization expenses decreasedincreased slightly to $11.10$12.28 per BOE for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2016, or a decrease of 41%, from $18.812017, as compared to $12.25 per BOE for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2015.2016. The decreaseincrease in both theour total and the per-unit-of-production depletion, depreciation and amortization expenses resulted fromwas primarily attributable to (i) increased well costs, largely as a result of increased well stimulation costs, since December 31, 2016, and (ii) the 32% increase in oil and natural gas production to 3.4 million BOE for the three months ended June 30, 2017, as compared to 2.6 million BOE for the three months ended June 30, 2016. The impact of the increase in well costs and oil and natural gas production on depletion, depreciation and amortization was mostly offset by higher estimated total proved reserves of 101.6134.4 million BOE, or a 17%an increase of 41%, at SeptemberJune 30, 2016,2017, as compared to estimated total proved reserves of 87.195.5 million BOE at SeptemberJune 30, 2015, as well as the decrease in unamortized property costs resulting from the full-cost ceiling impairments previously recorded in 2015 and the first and second quarters of 2016. ThisThe increase in total proved oil and natural gas reserves was primarily attributable to the continued delineation and development of our acreage in the Delaware Basin. In addition, depreciation expenses attributable to our midstream segment were approximately $1.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017, as compared to $0.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016.
Full-cost ceiling impairment. At SeptemberJune 30, 2016,2017, we recorded no impairment charge to the net capitalized costs of our oil and natural gas properties. We recorded an impairment charge of $285.7$78.2 million to the net capitalized costs of our oil and natural gas properties for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2015.2016.
General and administrative. Our general and administrative expenses increased by $1.0$4.0 million to $13.1$17.2 million, or an increase of 8%30%, for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2016,2017, as compared to $12.2$13.2 million for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2015. This2016. The increase is primarilyin our general and administrative expenses was attributable to the $3.7 million increase in non-cash stock-based compensation expense to $7.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017, as compared to $3.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016. The increase in our general and administrative expenses was also attributable to increased payroll and related expenses of approximately $1.4 million associated with additional employees joining the Company betweento support our increased land, geoscience, drilling, completion, production, midstream, accounting and administration functions as a result of the respective periods. General and administrative expenses also includedcontinued growth of the Company. The increase in our non-cash stock-based compensation was attributable to the increased expense related to the continued vesting of awards granted from 2013 through 2017 and the granting of new awards during the second quarter of 2017, as well as a change in the vesting schedule applicable to equity awards granted to our board of directors resulting in a $1.5 million one-time stock-based compensation expense. These increases were partially offset by the increase in capitalized general and administrative expense of $3.6$1.3 million due to our increased delineation and $1.8 milliondevelopment activities in the Delaware Basin for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. On2017, as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2016. As a unit-of-production basis,result, our general and administrative expenses decreased by 4%1% on a unit-of-production basis to $4.86$5.11 per BOE for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2016,2017, as compared to $5.05$5.18 per BOE for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2015. This decrease in general and administrative expenses on a unit-of-production basis was primarily attributable to the 12% increase in total oil equivalent production between the respective periods.
Net gain (loss) on asset sales and inventory impairment. For the three months ended September 30, 2016, we recognized $1.1 million of the deferred gain on the sale of certain natural gas gathering and processing assets in Loving County, Texas that occurred in the fourth quarter of 2015.2016.
Interest expense. For the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2016,2017, we incurred total interest expense of $7.6approximately $11.1 million. We capitalized $0.7 million of our interest expense on certain qualifying projects for the three months ended September 30, 2016 and expensed the remaining $6.9 million. For the three months ended September 30, 2015, we incurred total interest expense of $7.8 million. We capitalized $0.5approximately $1.9 million of our interest expense on certain qualifying projects for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20152017 and expensed the remaining $7.2$9.2 million to operations. At SeptemberFor the three months ended June 30, 2016, we had $65.0incurred total interest expense of approximately $7.9 million. We capitalized $1.7 million of our interest expense on certain qualifying projects for the three months ended June 30, 2016 and expensed the remaining $6.2 million to operations. The increase in total interest expense of $3.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017, as compared to the three months ended June 30,

2016, was attributable to an increase in the average debt outstanding. At June 30, 2017, we had no borrowings outstanding and $0.8 million in letters of credit outstanding under our revolving credit agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) and $575.0 million in outstanding senior notes. At June 30, 2016, we had no borrowings outstanding and $0.6 million in letters of credit outstanding under our Credit Agreement and $400.0 million in outstanding 6.875% senior notes due 2023 (the “Notes”).

notes.
Total income tax benefit. Our deferred tax assets exceedexceeded our deferred tax liabilities at June 30, 2017 due to the deferred tax assetsamounts generated by the full-cost ceiling impairment charges recorded in prior periods; asperiods. As a result, we established a valuation allowance against most of the deferred tax assets beginning in the third quarter of 2015. We retainretained a full valuation allowance at SeptemberJune 30, 20162017 due to uncertainties regarding the future realization of our deferred tax assets. The current tax benefit of $1.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2016 represents a refund due from the Internal Revenue Service. Total income tax expense for the three months ended September 30, 2015 differed from amounts computed by applying the U.S. federal statutory tax rate to loss before income taxes due primarily to the recording of the valuation allowance against the net deferred tax assets, which resulted from the full-cost ceiling impairment recorded in the third quarter of 2015.
NineSix Months Ended SeptemberJune 30, 20162017 as Compared to NineSix Months Ended SeptemberJune 30, 20152016
Production taxes, transportation and processing. Our production taxes, transportation and processing expenses increased by approximately $4.1$6.2 million to approximately $30.8$24.7 million, or an increase of approximately 15%34%, for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2016,2017, as compared to $26.7$18.5 million for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2015, in part due to increased oil and natural gas production between the respective periods.2016. On a unit-of-production basis, our production taxes, transportation and processing expenses increased by 8% to $4.16remained consistent at $3.90 per BOE for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2016,2017, as compared to $3.85$3.91 per BOE for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2015.2016. The increase on an absolute basisin production taxes, transportation and processing expenses was primarily attributable to higherthe $8.0 million increase in our production taxes to $14.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017, as compared to $6.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016, primarily due to the $115.3 million increase in oil and natural gas revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2017, as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2016. In addition, the production tax rates in New Mexico are higher than production tax rates in Texas. As more of our oil and natural gas production becomes attributable to New Mexico, we expect to continue to experience increased production tax expenses. The increased production taxes were partially offset by a decrease in transportation and processing expenses. Transportation and processing expenses decreased to $10.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017, as compared to transportation and processing expenses of $19.7$12.4 million for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2016, as compared to natural gas transportation and processing expenses2016. This decrease of $16.4$1.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015,was primarily due to the 7% increasestart-up in natural gas production to 22.6 Bcf duringlate August 2016 of the nine months ended September 30, 2016, as compared to 21.1 Bcf of natural gas production for the nine months ended September 30, 2015. This increase of $3.3 million in natural gas transportation and processing expenses was also due to the increase in natural gas production in the Delaware Basin as a percentage of our total natural gas production for the nine months ended September 30, 2016, as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2015. Natural gas transportation and processing expenses are higher in the Delaware Basin, as compared to the Eagle Ford shale, as the natural gas gathering and processing infrastructure has yet to meet the demand for these services due to the increased drilling activity in the Delaware Basin over the last few years. We have begun to incur lower processing expenses forBlack River Processing Plant, which processes most of the natural gas produced in our Rustler Breaks asset area in Eddy County, New Mexico, due toand the start up36% decrease in late August 2016 of the cryogenic natural gas production between the two periods in Northwest Louisiana and East Texas where our transportation and processing plant we constructedcharges are highest on a unit-of-production basis. On a unit-of-production basis, the expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2017 also benefited from significantly higher total oil equivalent production, which increased 34% in the Rustler Breaks asset area, and we expect to fully realize the impact of the lower processing expenses once the plant is operational for an entire quarter.
Our production taxes increased for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2016 by $0.5 million to $10.7 million,2017, as compared to $10.2 million for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2015, primarily due to the increase in our production from the Delaware Basin as a percentage of our total production between the comparable periods.2016.
Lease operating expenses.operating. Our lease operating expenses increased by approximately $1.2$5.1 million to $31.8 million, or an increase of 3%19%, for the six months ended June 30, 2017, as compared to $41.3$26.7 million for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2016, as compared to $40.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015.2016. Our lease operating expenses per unit of productionunit-of-production basis decreased 4%11% to $5.56$5.02 per BOE for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2016,2017, as compared to $5.78$5.66 per BOE for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2015.2016. The decrease achieved in lease operating expenses on a unit-of-production basis was attributable to several key factors, including (i) decreased field supervisory costs as a number of third-party contractors became full-time employees during the second quarter of 2016, (ii) decreased chemical costs associated with our Eagle Ford operations, (iii) decreased water disposal costs attributable to our ownincluding workover, salt water disposal facilities in the Wolf asset area, as well as new water disposal agreements negotiated with third parties, (iv) decreased supervisory and chemical costs, associated with our Eagle Ford operations(ii) additional salt water disposal and (v)gathering capacity added in both the Wolf and Rustler Breaks asset areas and (iii) increased oil equivalent production as compared to the same periodsix months ended June 30, 2016. This decrease was partially offset by increased workover expenses in 2015.the Wolf asset area during the six months ended June 30, 2017.
Plant and other midstream services operating. Our plant and other midstream services operating expenses increased by $0.8$3.2 million to $3.5$5.3 million, or an increase of 28%153%, for the threesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2017, as compared to $2.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016. This increase was partially attributable to the expenses associated with our salt water disposal operations of $3.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017, as compared to $1.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016, as compared to $2.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015. This increase is primarily attributable toa significant increase in third-partyresult of additional salt water being disposed of at our commercial facilitiesdisposal wells operating in the Wolf asset area.second quarter of 2017. The remaining increase was attributable to expenses of $1.8 million associated with the Black River Processing Plant, which began operating in August 2016.
Depletion, depreciation and amortization. Our depletion, depreciation and amortization expenses decreasedincreased by $53.3$15.1 million to $90.2$75.3 million, or a decrease of 37%25%, for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2016,2017, as compared to $143.5$60.2 million for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2015.2016. On a unit-of-production basis, our depletion, depreciation and amortization expenses decreased 7% to $12.15$11.89 per BOE for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2016, or a decrease of about 41%, from $20.672017, as compared to $12.75 per BOE for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2015.2016. The decreaseincrease in both theour total and the per-unit-of-production depletion, depreciation and amortization expenses resulted fromwas primarily attributable to (i) increased well costs, largely as a result of increased well stimulation costs, since December 31, 2016, and (ii) the 34% increase in oil and natural gas production to 6.3 million BOE for the six months ended June 30, 2017, as compared to 4.7 million BOE for the six months ended June 30, 2016. The decrease in our depletion, depreciation and amortization expenses on a unit-of-production basis was attributable to (i) the impairment charges recorded in 2016 and (ii) higher estimated total proved reserves of 101.6134.4 million BOE, or a 17%an increase of 41%, at SeptemberJune 30, 2016,2017, as compared to estimated total proved reserves of 87.195.5 million BOE at SeptemberJune 30, 2015, as well as the decrease in unamortized property costs resulting from the full-cost ceiling impairments previously recorded in 2015 and the first and second quarters of 2016. ThisThe increase in total proved oil and natural gas reserves was primarily attributable to the continued delineation and development of our acreage in the Delaware Basin. In addition, depreciation expenses attributable to our midstream segment were approximately $2.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017, as compared to $1.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016.

Full-cost ceiling impairment. At SeptemberJune 30, 2016,2017, we recorded no impairment charge to the net capitalized costs of our oil and natural gas properties. At June 30, 2016, the net capitalized costs of our oil and natural gas properties exceeded the cost center ceiling by $78.2 million. At March 31, 2016, the net capitalized costs of our oil and natural gas properties exceeded the cost center ceiling by $80.5 million. As a result, weWe recorded an impairment charge of $158.6 million to the net capitalized costs of our oil and natural gas properties for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2016. At September 30, 2015, the net capitalized costs of our oil and natural gas properties exceeded the cost center ceiling by $285.7 million. At June 30, 2015, the net capitalized costs of our oil and natural gas properties exceeded the cost center ceiling by $229.0 million. At March 31, 2015, the net capitalized costs of our oil and natural gas properties exceeded the cost center ceiling by $67.1 million. As a result, we recorded an impairment charge of $581.9 million to the net capitalized costs of our oil and natural gas properties for the nine months ended September 30, 2015.
General and administrative. Our general and administrative expenses increased by $1.0$7.2 million to $39.5$33.5 million, or an increase of 3%27%, for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2016,2017, as compared to $38.5$26.4 million for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2015. This2016. The increase is primarilyin our general and administrative expenses was attributable to the $5.6 million increase in non-cash stock-based compensation expense to $11.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017, as compared to $5.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016. The increase in our non-cash stock-based compensation was attributable to the increased expense related to the vesting of awards granted from 2013 through 2017 and the granting of new awards during the second quarter of 2017, as well as a change in the vesting schedule applicable to equity awards granted to our board of directors resulting in a $1.5 million one-time stock-based compensation expense. The increase in our general and administrative expenses was also attributable to transaction costs of approximately $3.5 million related to the formation of San Mateo and increased payroll and related expenses of approximately $4.0 million associated with additional employees joining the Company betweento support our increased land, geoscience, drilling, completion, production, midstream, accounting and administration functions as a result of the respective periods. On a unit-of-production basis,continued growth of the Company. These increases were partially offset by the increase in capitalized general and administrative expenses of $4.9 million due to our increased delineation and development activities in the Delaware Basin for the six months ended June 30, 2017, as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2016. Our general and administrative expenses decreased by 4%5% on a unit-of-production basis to $5.32$5.29 per BOE for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2016,2017, as compared to $5.55$5.58 per BOE for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2015. This decrease in general and administrative expenses on a unit-of-production basis was2016, primarily attributabledue to the 7% increase inour increased total oil equivalent production between the respective periods.
Net gain (loss) on asset sales and inventory impairment. For the nine months ended September 30, 2016, we recognized $3.1 million of the deferred gain on the sale of certain natural gas gathering and processing assets in Loving County, Texas that occurred in the fourth quarter of 2015.production.
Interest expense. For the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2016,2017, we incurred total interest expense of approximately $23.2$20.8 million. We capitalized approximately $2.9$3.2 million of our interest expense on certain qualifying projects for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20162017 and expensed the remaining $20.2 million.$17.7 million to operations. For the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2015,2016, we incurred total interest expense of approximately $18.0$15.6 million. We capitalized approximately $2.9$2.2 million of our interest expense on certain qualifying projects for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20152016 and expensed the remaining $15.2 million.$13.4 million to operations. The increase in total interest expense of $5.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017, as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2016, was attributable to an increase in the average effective interest rate between comparable periods due primarily to the issuance of the Notes in April 2015. In late April 2015, we used a portion of the net proceeds from the issuance of the Notes and our April 2015 equity offering to repay all outstanding borrowings under our Credit Agreement.debt outstanding. At SeptemberJune 30, 2016,2017, we had $65.0 millionno borrowings outstanding and $0.8 million in letters of credit outstanding under our Credit Agreement and $575.0 million in outstanding senior notes. At June 30, 2016, we had no borrowings outstanding and $0.6 million in letters of credit outstanding under our Credit Agreement and $400.0 million in outstanding Notes.senior notes.
Total income tax benefit. Our deferred tax assets exceedexceeded our deferred tax liabilities at June 30, 2017 due to the deferred tax assetsamounts generated by the full-cost ceiling impairment charges recorded in prior periods; asperiods. As a result, we established a valuation allowance against most of the deferred tax assets beginning in the third quarter of 2015. We retainretained a full valuation allowance at SeptemberJune 30, 20162017 due to uncertainties regarding the future realization of our deferred tax assets. The current tax benefit of $1.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 represents a refund due from the Internal Revenue Service. Total income tax expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 differed from amounts computed by applying the U.S. federal statutory tax rate to loss before income taxes due primarily to the recording of the valuation allowance against the net deferred tax assets which resulted from the full-cost ceiling impairment recorded in the third quarter of 2015.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our primary use of capital has been, and we expect will continue to be during the remainder of 20162017 and for the foreseeable future, for the acquisition, exploration and development of oil and natural gas properties and for related midstream investments. Excluding any possible significant acquisitions, we expect to fund our capital expenditure requirements through the remainder of 2016 and into 2017 throughwith a combination of cash on hand (including proceeds we received in connection with the formation of the Joint Venture), operating cash flows and borrowings under our Credit Agreement (assuming availability under our borrowing base). We continually evaluate other capital sources, including borrowings under additional credit arrangements, the sale or joint venture of midstream assets or oil and natural gas producing assets or acreage, particularly in our non-core asset areas, as well as potential issuances of equity, debt or convertible securities, none of which may be available.available on satisfactory terms or at all. Our future success in growing proved reserves and production will be highly dependent on our ability to access outside sources of capital and to generate operating cash flows.
On February 17, 2017, we announced the formation of San Mateo, a strategic joint venture with Five Point to operate and expand our Delaware Basin midstream assets. We received $171.5 million in connection with the formation of the Joint Venture and may earn up to an additional $73.5 million in performance incentives over the next five years. We continue to operate the Delaware Basin midstream assets and retain operational control of the Joint Venture. The Company and Five Point own 51% and 49% of the Joint Venture, respectively. San Mateo will continue to provide firm capacity service to us at market rates, while also being a midstream service provider to third parties in and around our Wolf and Rustler Breaks asset areas.
We expect that development of our Delaware Basin assets will be the primary focus of our operations and capital expenditures for the remainder of 2017. We operated five contracted drilling rigs in the Delaware Basin and one contracted drilling rig in the Eagle Ford during the second quarter of 2017. Our 2017 estimated capital expenditure budget consists of $400 to $420 million for drilling, completions, facilities and infrastructure and $56 to $64 million for midstream capital expenditures, which represents our 51% share of an estimated 2017 capital expenditure budget of $110 to $125 million for San Mateo. We

have allocated substantially all of our estimated 2017 capital expenditures to the further delineation and development of our growing leasehold position and midstream assets in the Delaware Basin, with the exception of amounts allocated to limited operations in the Eagle Ford (including the five wells drilled and completed in 2017) and Haynesville shales to maintain and extend leases and to participate in certain non-operated well opportunities. For the remainder of 2017, our Delaware Basin drilling program will continue to focus on the development of the Wolf and Rustler Breaks asset areas and the further delineation and development of the Jackson Trust, Ranger/Arrowhead, Antelope Ridge and Twin Lakes asset areas, although we may also continue to delineate previously untested zones in the Wolf and Rustler Breaks asset areas.
During the second quarter of 2017 and through August 2, 2017, we acquired approximately 8,300 net acres in the Delaware Basin, mostly in and around our existing acreage positions, including new leasing activities, acquisitions of small interests from mineral and working interest owners in our operated wells and acreage trades or term assignments with other operators. We incurred capital expenditures of approximately $28.0 million to acquire this additional acreage throughout the Delaware Basin, as well as for new 3-D seismic data across portions of our Wolf asset area. At SeptemberAugust 2, 2017, we held approximately 189,500 gross (108,000 net) acres in the Permian Basin in Southeast New Mexico and West Texas, primarily in the Delaware Basin in Lea and Eddy Counties, New Mexico and Loving County, Texas.
We plan to continue our leasing and acquisitions efforts in the Delaware Basin during the remainder of 2017 and may also continue acquiring acreage in the Eagle Ford and Haynesville shales. These expenditures are opportunity-specific and per-acre prices can vary significantly based on the opportunity. As a result, it is difficult to estimate these 2017 capital expenditures with any degree of certainty; therefore, we have not provided estimated capital expenditures related to acreage and mineral acquisitions for the remainder of 2017.
At June 30, 2016,2017, we had cash totaling $20.6approximately $131.5 million and restricted cash totaling approximately $15.0 million, most of which is associated with San Mateo. By contractual agreement, the borrowing basecash in the accounts held by our less-than-wholly-owned subsidiaries is not to be commingled with other Company cash and is to be used only to fund the capital expenditures and operations of these less-than-wholly-owned subsidiaries. Additionally, at June 30, 2017, we had no outstanding borrowings under our Credit Agreement, was $300.0 million. At September 30, 2016, we had $65.0 million of borrowings outstanding, $0.8 million in outstanding letters of credit pursuant to our Credit Agreement and $400.0 million of outstanding Notes. At November 1, 2016, we had $95.0 million of borrowings outstanding, $0.8 million in outstanding letters of credit pursuant to our Credit Agreement and $400.0 million of outstanding Notes.
During the fourth quarter of 2016, the lenders under our Credit Agreement completed their review of our estimated total proved oil and natural gas reserves at June 30, 2016, and aswhich has a result, in late October 2016, the borrowing base under our Credit Agreement was increased toof $450.0 million and an elected commitment of $400.0 million. This October 2016 redetermination constituted the regularly scheduled November 1 redetermination.

As of November 1, 2016, we adjusted our anticipated capital expenditures for acquisition, exploration and development activities and related midstream investments in 2016 from $325.0 million to between $425.0 and $450.0 million. We anticipate using such additional capital primarily for strategic acreage and minerals acquisitions and to accelerate a number of new midstream initiatives in the Delaware Basin. We incurred total capital expenditures of approximately $333.5 million during the first nine months of 2016. Our 20162017 capital expenditures may be further adjusted as business conditions warrant. While we have budgeted between $425.0warrant and $450.0 million in capital expenditures for 2016, the amount, timing and allocation of our capitalsuch expenditures is largely discretionary and within our control.
As of November 1, 2016, we anticipated investing between $425.0 and $450.0 million in capital for acquisition, exploration and development activities and related midstream investments in 2016 as follows:
Amount
(in millions)
Exploration, development drilling and completion costs, including production facilities and infrastructure$ 245.0 - 255.0
Midstream activities65.0
Leasehold acquisition and 2-D and 3-D seismic data110.0 - 125.0
Other5.0
Total$ 425.0 - 450.0

The aggregate amount of capital we will expend may fluctuate materially based on market conditions, the actual costs to drill, complete and place on production operated or non-operated wells, our drilling results, the actual costs and scope of our midstream activities, including the expansion of the Black River Processing Plant, the ability of our Joint Venture partner to meet its capital obligations, other opportunities that may become available to us and our ability to obtain capital. When oil or natural gas prices decline, as oil and natural gas prices have done since mid-2014, or costs increase significantly, we have the flexibility to defer a significant portion of our capital expenditures until later periods to conserve cash or to focus on projects that we believe have the highest expected returns and potential to generate near-term cash flows. We routinely monitor and adjust our capital expenditures in response to changes in prices, availability of financing, drilling, completion and acquisition costs, industry conditions, the timing of regulatory approvals, the availability of rigs, success or lack of success in our exploration and development activities, contractual obligations, drilling plans for properties we do not operate and other factors both within and outside our control.
Exploration and development activities are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, which could cause these activities to be less successful than we anticipate. A significant portion of our anticipated cash flows from operations for the remainder of 20162017 is expected to come from producing wells and development activities on currently proved properties in the Wolfcamp and Bone Spring plays in the Delaware Basin, the Eagle Ford shale in South Texas and the Haynesville shale in Northwest Louisiana. Our existing wells may not produce at the levels we are forecasting and our exploration and development activities in these areas may not be as successful as we anticipate. Additionally, our anticipated cash flows from operations are based upon current expectations of oil and natural gas prices for the remainder of 20162017 and the hedges we currently have in place. We use commodity derivative financial instruments at times to mitigate our exposure to fluctuations in oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids prices and to partially offset reductions in our cash flows from operations resulting from declines in commodity prices. At November 1, 2016,As of August 2, 2017, we had approximately 50%65% of our anticipated oil production and approximately 70% of our anticipated natural gas production hedged for the remainder of 2016.2017. See Note 8 to the interim unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements in this Quarterly Report for a summary of our open derivative financial instruments at SeptemberJune 30, 2016.2017.

Our unaudited cash flows for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20162017 and 20152016 are presented below:
Nine Months Ended 
 September 30,
Six Months Ended 
 June 30,
(In thousands)2016 20152017 2016
Net cash provided by operating activities$96,462
 $185,924
$121,242
 $49,600
Net cash used in investing activities(297,596) (405,559)(383,478) (166,032)
Net cash provided by financing activities204,968
 225,115
180,818
 140,573
Net change in cash$3,834
 $5,480
$(81,418) $24,141
Adjusted EBITDA(1)
$103,433
 $174,856
Adjusted EBITDA(1) attributable to Matador Resources Company shareholders
$142,611
 $56,145
__________________

(1)Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure. For a definition of Adjusted EBITDA and a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to our net income (loss) and net cash provided by operating activities, see “— Non-GAAP Financial Measures” below.
Cash Flows Provided by Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities decreased by $89.5increased $71.6 million to $96.5$121.2 million for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2016, as compared to net cash provided by operating activities of $185.92017 from $49.6 million for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2015.2016. Excluding changes in operating assets and liabilities, net cash provided by operating activities decreased by $75.3increased to $130.9 million to $85.4 million for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20162017 from $160.7$43.5 million for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2015.2016. This decrease isincrease was primarily attributable to the 12% decrease in ourhigher oil and natural gas revenues betweenproduction and higher commodity prices and was partially offset by the respective periods and significantly lowerdecrease in our realized gains on derivatives.derivatives and an increase in certain expenses. Changes in our operating assets and liabilities between the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and the nine months ended September 30, 2016two periods resulted in a net decrease of $14.2approximately $15.8 million in net cash provided by operating activities for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2017, as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2016.
Our operating cash flows are sensitive to a number of variables, including changes in our production and volatility of oil and natural gas prices between reporting periods. Regional and worldwide economic activity, the actions of OPEC, weather, infrastructure capacity to reach markets and other variable factors significantly impact the prices of oil and natural gas. These factors are beyond our control and are difficult to predict. We use commodity derivative financial instruments to mitigate our exposure to fluctuations in oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids prices. In addition, we attempt to avoid long-term service agreements where possible in order to minimize ongoing future commitments.
Cash Flows Used in Investing Activities
Net cash used in investing activities decreasedincreased by $108.0$217.4 million to $297.6$383.5 million for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20162017 from $405.6$166.0 million for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2015.2016. This decreaseincrease in net cash used in investing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2016, as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2015, is primarily attributabledue to the following factors: (i) a decreasean increase of $46.8$166.5 million in oil and natural gas properties capital expenditures due to our reduced 2016 capital expenditure budget, (ii) a $24.0 million decrease in cash usedfor the six months ended June 30, 2017, as a result of expenditures incurred in 2015 in connection with our merger with Harvey E. Yates Company (the “HEYCO Merger”) and (iii) a decrease in restricted cash of $42.4 million primarily attributablecompared to the return of cash from the escrow account established to facilitate potential like-kind exchange transactions associated with the sale of certain midstream assets in Loving County, Texas in the fourth quarter of 2015. This decrease was partially offset by the $10.4 million increase in cash used primarily for our midstream investments, including for the construction and installation of the natural gas processing plant and natural gas gathering system in the Rustler Breaks asset area in Eddy County, New Mexico.six months ended June 30, 2016. Cash used for oil and natural gas properties capital expenditures for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20162017 was primarily attributable to our operated drilling and completion activities and the acquisition of additional leasehold and mineral interests and our operated drilling and completion activities in the Delaware Basin. A small portion of our capital expenditures for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20162017 was directed to our participation in non-operated wells primarilyand our operated drilling and completion activities in the Delaware BasinEagle Ford shale. Additionally, there was an increase in cash outflows related to restricted cash of approximately $57.7 million between the two periods. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in cash used for other property and the Haynesville shale.equipment of approximately $5.8 million.
Cash Flows Provided by Financing Activities
Net cash provided by financing activities decreasedincreased by $20.1$40.2 million to $205.0$180.8 million for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20162017 from $225.1$140.6 million for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2015.2016. The increase in net cash provided by financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2017 was primarily attributable to (i) the increase of $171.5 million related to contributions from the formation of the Joint Venture and (ii) the net increase of $12.7 million related to contributions from and distributions to the non-controlling interest owners of less-than-wholly-owned subsidiaries, which were offset by (x) an increase in cash outflows of $2.7 million related to the purchase of the non-controlling interest of a less-than-wholly-owned subsidiary and (y) an increase in cash outflows of $2.0 million related to taxes paid in connection with the net share settlement of stock-based compensation. The net cash provided by financing activities for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2016 was primarily attributable to the net proceeds from our March 2016 equity offering of $142.4 million ($141.5141.6 million net ofincluding cost to issue equity) and the proceeds from borrowings under the Credit Agreement of $65.0 million. These net proceeds were partially offset by the taxes paid on net share settlements of stock-based compensation of $1.6 million. The net cash provided by financing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 was primarily attributable to the net proceeds from our April 2015 Notes offering of approximately $391.0 million, the net proceeds from our April 2015 equity offering of $187.5 million and proceeds from borrowings under the Credit Agreement of $125.0 million. These net proceeds were partially offset by (i) the $477.0 million repayment of the borrowings outstanding under our Credit Agreement and debt obligations assumed in the HEYCO Merger and (ii) the taxes paid on net share settlements of stock-based compensation of $1.6 million..
See Note 5 to the interim unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements in this Quarterly Report for a summary of our debt, including our Credit Agreement and the Notes.senior notes.

Non-GAAP Financial Measures
We define Adjusted EBITDA as earnings before interest expense, income taxes, depletion, depreciation and amortization, accretion of asset retirement obligations, property impairments, unrealized derivative gains and losses, certain other non-cash items and non-cash stock-based compensation expense, and net gain or loss on asset sales and inventory impairment. Adjusted EBITDA is not a measure of net income (loss) or cash flows as determined by GAAP. Adjusted EBITDA is a supplemental non-

GAAPnon-GAAP financial measure that is used by management and external users of our consolidated financial statements, such as industry analysts, investors, lenders and rating agencies.
Management believes Adjusted EBITDA is necessary because it allows us to evaluate our operating performance and compare the results of operations from period to period without regard to our financing methods or capital structure. We exclude the items listed above from net income (loss) in calculating Adjusted EBITDA because these amounts can vary substantially from company to company within our industry depending upon accounting methods and book values of assets, capital structures and the method by which certain assets were acquired.
Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered an alternative to, or more meaningful than, net income or cash flows from operating activities as determined in accordance with GAAP or as a primary indicator of our operating performance or liquidity. Certain items excluded from Adjusted EBITDA are significant components of understanding and assessing a company’s financial performance, such as a company’s cost of capital and tax structure. Our Adjusted EBITDA may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of another company because all companies may not calculate Adjusted EBITDA in the same manner.

The following table presents our calculation of Adjusted EBITDA and the reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to the GAAP financial measures of net income (loss) and net cash provided by operating activities, respectively.
Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended 
 September 30,
Three Months Ended 
 June 30,
 Six Months Ended 
 June 30,
(In thousands)2016 2015 2016 20152017 2016 2017 2016
Unaudited Adjusted EBITDA Reconciliation to Net Income (Loss):              
Net income (loss) attributable to Matador Resources Company shareholders$11,931
 $(242,059) $(201,575) $(449,384)$28,509
 $(105,853) $72,493
 $(213,507)
Net income attributable to non-controlling interest in subsidiaries3,178
 106
 5,094
 93
Net income (loss)31,687
 (105,747) 77,587
 (213,414)
Interest expense6,880
 7,229
 20,244
 15,168
9,224
 6,167
 17,679
 13,365
Total income tax benefit(1,141) (33,305) (1,141) (149,045)
Depletion, depreciation and amortization30,015
 45,237
 90,185
 143,477
41,274
 31,248
 75,266
 60,170
Accretion of asset retirement obligations276
 182
 828
 427
314
 289
 614
 552
Full-cost ceiling impairment
 285,721
 158,633
 581,874

 78,171
 
 158,633
Unrealized (gain) loss on derivatives(3,203) (6,733) 30,261
 25,356
(13,190) 26,625
 (33,821) 33,464
Stock-based compensation expense3,584
 1,755
 9,138
 6,886
7,026
 3,310
 11,192
 5,553
Net (gain) loss on asset sales and inventory impairment(1,073) 
 (3,140) 97
Adjusted EBITDA$47,269
 $58,027
 $103,433
 $174,856
Net gain on asset sales and inventory impairment
 (1,002) (7) (2,067)
Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA76,335

39,061

148,510

56,256
Adjusted EBITDA attributable to non-controlling interest in subsidiaries(3,683) (115) (5,899) (111)
Adjusted EBITDA attributable to Matador Resources Company shareholders$72,652
 $38,946
 $142,611
 $56,145
Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended 
 September 30,
Three Months Ended
June 30,
 Six Months Ended 
 June 30,
(In thousands)2016 2015 2016 20152017 2016 2017 2016
Unaudited Adjusted EBITDA Reconciliation to Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities:              
Net cash provided by operating activities$46,862
 $72,535
 $96,462
 $185,924
$59,933
 $31,242
 $121,242
 $49,600
Net change in operating assets and liabilities(4,909) (20,846) (11,024) (25,234)7,198
 1,944
 9,653
 (6,117)
Interest expense, net of non-cash portion6,573
 6,678
 19,345
 14,617
9,204
 5,875
 17,615
 12,773
Current income tax benefit(1,141) (295) (1,141) (295)
Net income attributable to non-controlling interest in subsidiaries(116) (45) (209) (156)
Adjusted EBITDA$47,269
 $58,027
 $103,433
 $174,856
Adjusted EBITDA attributable to non-controlling interest in subsidiaries(3,683) (115) (5,899) (111)
Adjusted EBITDA attributable to Matador Resources Company shareholders$72,652
 $38,946
 $142,611
 $56,145
The net income attributable to Matador Resources Company shareholders increased by $254.0$134.4 million to net income of $11.9$28.5 million for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2016,2017, as compared to a net loss attributable to Matador Resources Company shareholders of $242.1$105.9 million for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2015.2016. This increase in the net income attributable to Matador Resources Company shareholders for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20162017 as compared to the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20152016 is primarily attributable to (i) the decrease of $78.2 million in the full-cost ceiling impairment, (ii) the decrease in depletion, depreciation and amortization expense and (iii) the increase in oil and natural gas revenues of $44.4 million and (iii) a change of $39.8 million from unrealized loss to unrealized gain on derivatives, offset by (x) the increase in certain expenses, including a $10.0 million increase in depletion, depreciation and amortization expenses, (y) a $3.1 million increase in interest expense and (z) a $3.7 million increase in stock-based compensation expense.
The net income attributable to Matador Resources Company shareholders increased by $286.0 million to $72.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017, as compared to a net loss attributable to Matador Resources Company shareholders of $213.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016. This increase in net income attributable to Matador Resources Company shareholders for the six months ended June 30, 2017 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2016 is primarily attributable to (i) the decrease of $158.6 million in the full-cost ceiling impairment, (ii) the increase in oil and natural gas revenues of $115.3 million and (iii) a change of $67.3 million from unrealized loss to unrealized gain on derivatives, offset by (x) the increase in certain expenses, including a $15.1 million increase in depletion, depreciation and amortization expenses, (y) a $4.3 million increase in interest expense and (z) a $5.6 million increase in stock-based compensation expense.
Our Adjusted EBITDA increased by $33.7 million to $72.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017, as compared to $38.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016. This increase in our Adjusted EBITDA is primarily

attributable to higher oil and natural gas production and higher commodity prices, which waswere partially offset by (x) thea decrease in the realized gain on derivatives and (y) the decrease in the deferred income tax benefit.
The net loss attributable to Matador Resources Company shareholders decreased by $247.8 million to $201.6 million, or a decrease of 55%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2016, as compared to a net loss of $449.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015. This decrease in the net loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2016, as compared to

the nine months ended September 30, 2015 is primarily attributable to (i) the decrease in the full-cost ceiling impairment and (ii) the decrease in depletion, depreciation and amortization expense, which was partially offset by (w) the decrease in oil and natural gas revenues, (x) the decrease in the realized gain on derivatives, (y) thean increase in interest expense and (z) the decrease in the deferred income tax benefit.
Our Adjusted EBITDA decreased by $10.8 million to $47.3 million, or a decrease of 19%,certain expenses for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2016,2017, as compared to $58.0 million for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2015.2016.
Our Adjusted EBITDA increased by $86.5 million to $142.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017, as compared to $56.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016. This decreaseincrease in our Adjusted EBITDA is primarily attributable to thehigher oil and natural gas production and higher commodity prices, which were partially offset by a decrease in the realized gain on derivatives but was partially mitigated by theand an increase in oil and natural gas revenuescertain expenses for the threesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2016,2017, as compared to the threesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2015.
Our Adjusted EBITDA decreased by $71.4 million to $103.4 million, or a decrease of 41%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2016, as compared to $174.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015. This decrease in our Adjusted EBITDA is primarily attributable to the decrease in the realized gains on derivatives and the decrease in oil and natural gas revenues resulting from lower commodity prices for the nine months ended September 30, 2016, as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2015.2016.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
From time-to-time, we enter into off-balance sheet arrangements and transactions that can give rise to material off-balance sheet obligations. As of SeptemberJune 30, 2016,2017, the material off-balance sheet arrangements and transactions that we have entered into include (i) operating lease agreements, (ii) non-operated drilling commitments, (iii) termination obligations under drilling rig contracts, (iv) firm transportation, gathering, processing, disposal and fractionation commitments (v) agreements to construct facilities and (vi)(v) contractual obligations for which the ultimate settlement amounts are not fixed and determinable, such as derivative contracts that are sensitive to future changes in commodity prices or interest rates, gathering, treating, fractionation and transportation commitments on uncertain volumes of future throughput, open delivery commitments and indemnification obligations following certain divestitures. Other than the off-balance sheet arrangements described above, we havethe Company has no transactions, arrangements or other relationships with unconsolidated entities or other persons that are reasonably likely to materially affect ourthe Company’s liquidity or availability of or requirements for capital resources. See “Obligations“—Obligations and Commitments” below and Note 10 to the interim unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements in this Quarterly Report for more information regarding our off-balance sheet arrangements. Such information is incorporated herein by reference.
Obligations and Commitments
We had the following material contractual obligations and commitments at SeptemberJune 30, 20162017:
Payments Due by PeriodPayments Due by Period
(In thousands)Total 
Less
Than
1 Year
 
1 - 3
Years
 
3 - 5
Years
 
More
Than
5 Years
Total 
Less
Than
1 Year
 
1 - 3
Years
 
3 - 5
Years
 
More
Than
5 Years
Contractual Obligations:                  
Revolving credit borrowings, including letters of credit(1)
$65,821
 $821
 $
 $65,000
 $
$821
 $
 $
 $821
 $
Senior unsecured notes(2)
400,000
 
 
 
 400,000
575,000
 
 
 
 575,000
Office leases25,663
 2,418
 5,006
 5,239
 13,000
23,864
 2,494
 5,051
 5,314
 11,005
Non-operated drilling commitments(3)
11,183
 11,183
 
 
 
19,697
 19,697
 
 
 
Drilling rig contracts(4)
42,952
 22,674
 20,278
 
 
41,974
 27,295
 14,679
 
 
Asset retirement obligations19,481
 29
 1,863
 4,077
 13,512
23,094
 703
 572
 3,737
 18,082
Natural gas processing and transportation agreements(5)
13,606
 1,648
 11,958
 
 
Natural gas plant engineering, procurement, construction and installation contract(6)
4,236
 4,236
 
 
 
Gas processing agreements with non-affiliates(5)
11,858
 3,795
 8,063
 
 
Gathering, processing and disposal agreements with San Mateo(6)
256,412
 
 36,110
 69,994
 150,308
Natural gas plant engineering, procurement, construction and installation contract(7)
47,026
 47,026
 
 
 
Total contractual cash obligations$582,942
 $43,009
 $39,105
 $74,316
 $426,512
$999,746
 $101,010
 $64,475
 $79,866
 $754,395
__________________
(1)
At SeptemberJune 30, 20162017, we had $65.0 million ofno borrowings outstanding under our Credit Agreement and approximately $0.8 million in outstanding letters of credit issued pursuant to the Credit Agreement. The Credit Agreement matures in October 2020.
(2)TheseThe amounts included in the table above represent principal maturities only.
(3)At SeptemberJune 30, 2016,2017, we had outstanding commitments to participate in the drilling and completion of various non-operated wells. Our working interests in these wells are typically small, and severalcertain of these wells were in progress at SeptemberJune 30, 2016.2017. If all of these wells are drilled and completed, we will have minimum outstanding aggregate commitments for our participation in these wells of $11.2approximately $19.7 million at SeptemberJune 30, 2016,2017, which we expect to incur within the next few months.year.

(4)We do not own or operate our own drilling rigs, but instead enter into contracts with third parties for such drilling rigs. See Note 10 to the interim unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements in this Quarterly Report for more information regarding our contractual commitments.
(5)Effective September 1, 2012, we entered into a firm five-year natural gas processing and transportation agreement for a significant portion of our operated natural gas production in South Texas. Effective October 1, 2015, we entered into a 15-year fixed-fee natural gas gathering and processing agreement for a

significant portion of our operated natural gas production in Loving County, Texas. See Note 10 to the interim unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements in this Quarterly Report for more information regarding our contractual commitments.
(6)Effective February 1, 2017, we dedicated our current and future leasehold interests in the Rustler Breaks and Wolf asset areas pursuant to 15-year, fixed-fee natural gas, oil and salt water gathering agreements and salt water disposal agreements. In addition, effective February 1, 2017, we dedicated our current and future leasehold interests in the Rustler Breaks asset area pursuant to a 15-year, fixed-fee natural gas processing agreement. See Note 10 to the interim unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements in this Quarterly Report for more information regarding our contractual commitments.
(6)(7)In 2015, weBeginning in May 2017, a subsidiary of San Mateo entered into an agreementcertain agreements with a third partyparties for the engineering, procurement, construction and installation of a natural gas processing plant inan expansion of the Rustler Breaks asset area in Eddy County, New Mexico.Black River Processing Plant, including required compression. See Note 10 to the interim unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements in this Quarterly Report for more information regarding our contractual commitments.
General Outlook and Trends
For the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2016,2017, oil prices rangedaveraged $48.15 per Bbl, ranging from a high of $53.40 per Bbl in mid-April to a low of approximately $39.51$42.53 per Bbl in early August to a high of approximately $48.99 per Bbl in early July,late June, based upon the NYMEX West Texas Intermediate oil futures contract price for the earliest delivery date. We realized an average oil price of $42.57$46.01 per Bbl ($43.1846.34 per Bbl including realized gains from oil derivatives) for our oil production for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2016,2017, as compared to $43.21$42.84 per Bbl ($57.9043.29 per Bbl including realized gains from oil derivatives) for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2015. Subsequent to September 30, 2016, oil prices have decreased and, at November 1, 2016,2016. At August 2, 2017, the NYMEX West Texas Intermediate oil futures contract for the earliest delivery date closedhad increased from the weighted average price for the second quarter of 2017, settling at $46.67$49.59 per Bbl, which was also an increase as compared to $46.14$39.51 per Bbl at NovemberAugust 2, 2015.2016.
For the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2016,2017, natural gas prices rangedaveraged $3.14 per MMBtu, ranging from a high of $3.06approximately $3.42 per MMBtu in mid-May to a low of approximately $2.89 per MMBtu in late September to a low of $2.55 per MMBtu in mid-August,June, based upon the NYMEX Henry Hub natural gas futures contract price for the earliest delivery date. We realized a weighted average natural gas price of $3.08$3.40 per Mcf ($3.083.39 per Mcf including realized losses from natural gas derivatives) for our natural gas production (including revenues attributable to natural gas liquids) for the three months ended June 30, 2017, as compared to $2.10 per Mcf ($2.34 per Mcf including realized gains from natural gas derivatives) for our natural gas production for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2016, as compared to $2.90 per Mcf ($3.28 per Mcf including aggregate realized gains from natural gas and NGL derivatives) for the three months ended September 30, 2015. Because we report our production volumes in two streams, oil and natural gas, including dry and liquids-rich natural gas, revenues associated with extracted natural gas liquids are included with our natural gas revenues, which has the effect of increasing the weighted average natural gas price realized on a per Mcf basis. Since September 30, 2016, natural gas prices have been volatile, and at November 1, 2016,2016. At August 2, 2017, the NYMEX Henry Hub natural gas futures contract for the earliest delivery date closedhad decreased from the weighted average price for the second quarter of 2017, settling at $2.90$2.81 per MMBtu, which was a small increase as compared to $2.26$2.73 per MMBtu at NovemberAugust 2, 2015.2016.
The prices we receive for oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids heavily influence our revenue, profitability, cash flow available for capital expenditures, access to capital and future rate of growth. Oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids are commodities, and therefore, their prices are subject to wide fluctuations in response to relatively minor changes in supply and demand. Historically, the markets for oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids have been volatile and these markets will likely continue to be volatile in the future. Declines in oil, natural gas or natural gas liquids prices not only reduce our revenues, but could also reduce the amount of oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids we can produce economically. We are uncertain when, or if oil natural gas and natural gas liquids prices may rise from their current levels, and in fact, oil natural gas and natural gas liquids prices may decrease again in future periods.
From time to time, we use derivative financial instruments to mitigate our exposure to commodity price risk associated with oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids prices. Even so, decisions as to whether, at what price and what production volumes to hedge are difficult and depend on market conditions and our forecast of future production and oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids prices, and we may not always employ the optimal hedging strategy. This, in turn, may affect the liquidity that can be accessed through the borrowing base under our Credit Agreement and through the capital markets. We expect our realized gains from derivatives, if any, to be less for
Coinciding with the remainderrecent improvements in oil and natural gas prices since the latter part of 2016, as comparedwe have begun to comparable periods in 2015, especiallyexperience price increases from our service providers for some of the products and services we use in our drilling, completion and production operations. If oil derivative contracts.and natural gas prices remain at their current levels for a longer period of time or should they increase further, we could experience additional price increases for drilling, completion and production products and services, although we can provide no estimates as to the eventual magnitude of these increases.
Like other oil and natural gas producing companies, our properties are subject to natural production declines. By their nature, our oil and natural gas wells will experience rapid initial production declines. We attempt to overcome these production declines by drilling to develop and identify additional reserves, by exploring for new sources of reserves and, at times, by acquisitions. During times of severe oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids price declines, however, drilling additionalcertain oil or natural gas wells may not be economical, and we may find it necessary to reduce capital expenditures and curtail drilling operations in order to preserve liquidity. A material reduction in capital expenditures and drilling activities could materially impact our production volumes, revenues, reserves, cash flows and our availability under our Credit Agreement.
We strive to focus our efforts on increasing oil and natural gas reserves and production while controlling costs at a level that is appropriate for long-term operations. Our ability to find and develop sufficient quantities of oil and natural gas reserves at economical costs is critical to our long-term success. Future finding and development costs are subject to changes in the costs of acquiring, drilling and completing our prospects.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.Risk
Except as set forth below, there have been no material changes to the sources and effects of our market risk since December 31, 2015,2016, which are disclosed in Part II, Item 7A of the Annual Report.Report and incorporated herein by reference.
Commodity price exposure. We are exposed to market risk as the prices of oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids fluctuate as a result of changes in supply and demand and other factors. To partially reduce price risk caused by these market fluctuations, we have entered into derivative financial instruments in the past and expect to enter into derivative financial instruments in the future to cover a significant portion of our anticipated future production.
We typically use costless (or zero-cost) collars and/or swap contracts to manage risks related to changes in oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids prices. Costless collars provide us with downside price protection through the purchase of a put option thatwhich is financed through the sale of a call option. Because the call option proceeds are used to offset the cost of the put option, these arrangements are initially “costless” to us. In the case of a costless collar, the put option and the call option have different fixed price components. In a swap contract, a floating price is exchanged for a fixed price over a specified time,period, providing downside price protection.
We record all derivative financial instruments at fair value. The fair value of our derivative financial instruments is determined using industry-standard models that consider various inputs including: (i) quoted forward pricespurchase and sale information available for commodities, (ii) time value of money and (iii) current market and contractual prices for the underlying instruments, as well as other relevant economic measures.similarly traded securities. At SeptemberJune 30, 2016,2017, Comerica Bank, The Bank of Nova Scotia, BMO Harris Financing Inc. (Bank of Montreal) and SunTrust Bank (or affiliates thereof) were the counterparties for all of our derivative instruments. We have evaluatedconsidered the credit standing of the counterparties in determining the fair value of our derivative financial instruments. See Note 8 to the interim unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements in this Quarterly Report for a summary of our open derivative financial instruments at SeptemberJune 30, 2016.2017. Such information is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report, we evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act) under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of SeptemberJune 30, 20162017 to ensure that (i) information required to be disclosed in the reports the Companyit files and submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and that (ii) information required to be disclosed under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including itsour Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.disclosure.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
During the quarter ended SeptemberJune 30, 2016,2017, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reportingcontrols that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect,have a material effect on our internal control over financial reporting.

Part II—OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
We are party to several lawsuits encountered in the ordinary course of business. While the ultimate outcome and impact to us cannot be predicted with certainty, in the opinion of management, it is remote that these lawsuits will have a material adverse impact on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
We are subject to various risks and uncertainties in the course of our business. For a discussion of such risks and uncertainties, please see “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in the Annual Report.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
During the quarter ended SeptemberJune 30, 2016,2017, the Company re-acquired shares of common stock from certain employees in order to satisfy the employees’ tax liability in connection with the vesting of restricted stock.
Period 
Total Number of Shares Purchased (1)
 Average Price Paid Per Share Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased under the Plans or Programs
July 1, 2016 to July 31, 2016 1,972
 $20.68
 
 
August 1, 2016 to August 31, 2016 16,883
 21.61
 
 
September 1, 2016 to September 30, 2016 1,283
 22.99
 
 
Total 20,138
 $21.61
 
 
Period 
Total Number of Shares Purchased (1)
 Average Price Paid Per Share Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased under the Plans or Programs
April 1, 2017 to April 30, 2017 2,225
 $23.71
 
 
May 1, 2017 to May 31, 2017 2,530
 22.84
 
 
June 1, 2017 to June 30, 2017 109
 21.74
 
 
Total 4,864
 $23.21
 
 
_________________
(1) The shares were not re-acquired pursuant to any repurchase plan or program.

Item 6. Exhibits
A list of exhibits filed herewith is contained in the Exhibit Index that immediately precedes such exhibits and is incorporated by reference herein.

SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
 
   MATADOR RESOURCES COMPANY
   
Date: November 4, 2016August 7, 2017By: /s/ Joseph Wm. Foran
   Joseph Wm. Foran
   Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Date: November 4, 2016August 7, 2017By: /s/ David E. Lancaster
   David E. Lancaster
   Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


EXHIBIT INDEX
 
Exhibit
Number
 Description
   
3.1 Certificate of Merger between Matador Resources Company (now known as MRC Energy Company) and Matador Merger Co. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.4 to our Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed on August 12, 2011).
   
3.2 Amended and Restated Certificate of Formation of Matador Resources Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 13, 2012)(filed herewith).
   
3.3 Certificate of Amendment to the Amended and Restated Certificate of Formation of Matador Resources Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2015)dated April 2, 2015 (filed herewith).
   
3.4Certificate of Amendment to the Amended and Restated Certificate of Formation of Matador Resources Company effective June 2, 2017 (filed herewith).
3.5 Amended and Restated Bylaws of Matador Resources Company, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 25,December 23, 2016).
   
3.53.6 Statement of Resolutions for Series A Convertible Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 2, 2015).
   
10.1 EighthForm of Employment Agreement between Matador Resources Company and each of Billy E. Goodwin and G. Gregg Krug, effective February 19, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2017).
10.2Tenth Amendment to Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of October 31, 2016,April 28, 2017, by and among MRC Energy Company, as Borrower, the Lenders party thereto and Royal Bank of Canada, as Administrative Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 2, 2016)May 4, 2017).
10.3Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement for Annual Grants relating to the Matador Resources Company Amended and Restated 2012 Long-Term Incentive Plan (filed herewith).
10.4Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement for Annual Grants with delayed delivery relating to the Matador Resources Company Amended and Restated 2012 Long-Term Incentive Plan (filed herewith).
   
23.1 Consent of Netherland, Sewell & Associates, Inc. (filed herewith).
  
31.1 Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).
  
31.2 Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).
  
32.1 Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (furnished herewith).
  
32.2 Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (furnished herewith).
  
99.1 Audit report of Netherland, Sewell & Associates, Inc. (filed herewith).
  
   101 
The following financial information from Matador Resources Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended SeptemberJune 30, 20162017 formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets - Unaudited, (ii) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations - Unaudited, (iii) the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity - Unaudited, (iv) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows - Unaudited and (v) the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements - Unaudited (submitted electronically herewith).
 



4044