UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)



x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended ~~September 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015



¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission file number: 001-35355

_____________________________________________________________

MANNING & NAPIER, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



Delaware		45-2609100
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

290 Woodcliff Drive Fairport, New York		14450
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:

(585) 325-6880

_____________________________________________________________

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.



Class		Outstanding at ~~November 6, 2014~~May 5, 2015
Class A common stock, $0.01 par value per share		~~13,705,419~~14,785,130
Class B common stock, $0.01 par value per share		1,000

TABLE OF CONTENTS



		Page
Part I	Financial Information
Item 1.	Financial Statements (unaudited)
	Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition as of ~~September 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 and December 31, ~~2013~~2014	1
	Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2015 and 2014 ~~and 2013~~	2
	Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2015 and 2014 ~~and 2013~~	3
	Consolidated ~~Statement~~Statements of Shareholders’ Equity for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2015 and 2014	4
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2015 and 2014 ~~and 2013~~	5
	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	6
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	1918
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	3833
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	3833

Part II	Other Information
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	4035
Item 6.	Exhibits	4035

	In this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, “we”, “our”, “us”, the “Company”, “Manning & Napier” and the “Registrant” refers to Manning & Napier, Inc. and, unless the context otherwise requires, its consolidated direct and indirect subsidiaries and predecessors.

Table of Contents

PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

Manning & Napier, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition

(In thousands, except share data)


	September 30, 2014			December 31, 2013			March 31, 2015			December 31, 2014
	(unaudited)						(unaudited)
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	118,857		$	125,250		$	80,377		$	124,992
Accounts receivable	24,322			24,140			21,889			23,704
Accounts receivable—Manning & Napier Fund, Inc.	17,089			16,461			13,245			15,579
Due from broker	5,567			5,816			4,909			5,391
Due from broker - consolidated funds							5,032			—
Investment securities, at fair value	25,782			21,321			25,210			26,915
Prepaid expenses and other assets	7,562			8,028			7,972			9,321
Total current assets	199,179			201,016			158,634			205,902
Property and equipment, net	6,650			5,424			7,327			7,456
Net deferred tax assets, non-current	43,839			46,164			41,848			42,581
Other long-term assets	1,618			—			1,476			1,534
Total assets	$	251,286		$	252,604		$	209,285		$	257,473

Liabilities
Accounts payable	$	2,222		$	1,476		$	1,661		$	2,906
Accrued expenses and other liabilities	43,729			49,813			33,191			50,779
Deferred revenue	13,955			12,007			13,495			12,812
Total current liabilities	59,906			63,296			48,347			66,497
Other long-term liabilities	2,478			1,444			3,065			3,116
Amounts payable under tax receivable agreement, non-current	39,126			42,075			39,166			39,149
Total liabilities	101,510			106,815			90,578			108,762
Commitments and contingencies (Note 10)
Commitments and contingencies (Note 9)
Shareholders’ equity
Class A common stock, $0.01 par value; 300,000,000 shares authorized; 13,705,419 and 13,634,246 issued and outstanding at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively	137			136
Class B common stock, $0.01 par value; 2,000 shares authorized, 1,000 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013	—			—
Class A common stock, $0.01 par value; 300,000,000 shares authorized; 13,713,540 issued and outstanding at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively							137			137
Class B common stock, $0.01 par value; 2,000 shares authorized, 1,000 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014							—			—
Additional paid-in capital	213,070			208,988			204,975			209,284
Retained deficit	(45,905		)	(40,544		)	(39,972		)	(41,087		)
Accumulated other comprehensive income	—			(1		)	(1		)	—
Total shareholders’ equity	167,302			168,579			165,139			168,334
Noncontrolling interests	(17,526		)	(22,790		)	(46,432		)	(19,623		)
Total shareholders’ equity and noncontrolling interests	149,776			145,789			118,707			148,711
Total liabilities, shareholders’ equity and noncontrolling interests	$	251,286		$	252,604		$	209,285		$	257,473

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

Manning & Napier, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Operations

(In thousands, except share data)

(Unaudited)


	Three months ended September 30,						Nine months ended September 30,						Three months ended March 31,
	2014			2013			2014			2013			2015			2014
Revenues
Investment management services revenue	$	104,795		$	94,647		$	307,129		$	277,876		$	90,426		$	98,470
Expenses
Compensation and related costs	51,499			44,935			159,457			140,739			26,818			51,810
Distribution, servicing and custody expenses	19,921			17,459			58,325			49,869			16,832			18,440
Other operating costs	9,365			7,706			25,867			23,235			8,942			7,937
Total operating expenses	80,785			70,100			243,649			213,843			52,592			78,187
Operating income	24,010			24,547			63,480			64,033			37,834			20,283
Non-operating income (loss)
Interest expense	(14		)	(14		)	(21		)	(20		)	(3		)	(3		)
Interest and dividend income	144			100			553			234			163			214
Change in liability under tax receivable agreement	(65		)	(118		)	2,045			(118		)	(17		)	2,110
Net (losses) gains on investments	(1,279		)	500			(446		)	452
Net gains on investments													613			116
Total non-operating income (loss)	(1,214		)	468			2,131			548			756			2,437
Income before provision for income taxes	22,796			25,015			65,611			64,581			38,590			22,720
Provision for income taxes	2,976			2,222			10,412			6,799			2,479			5,076
Net income attributable to controlling and noncontrolling interests	19,820			22,793			55,199			57,782			36,111			17,644
Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interests	19,392			21,479			53,991			55,864			32,802			17,563
Net income attributable to Manning & Napier, Inc.	$	428		$	1,314		$	1,208		$	1,918		$	3,309		$	81

Net income per share available to Class A common stock
Basic	$	0.03		$	0.10		$	0.09		$	0.14		$	0.24		$	0.01
Diluted	$	0.03		$	0.10		$	0.09		$	0.14		$	0.24		$	0.01
Weighted average shares of Class A common stock outstanding
Basic	13,705,134			13,634,246			13,669,391			13,612,289			13,713,540			13,634,401
Diluted	13,930,020			13,690,641			13,822,402			13,673,499			13,914,908			13,751,690
Cash dividends declared per share of Class A common stock	$	0.16		$	0.16		$	0.48		$	0.48		$	0.16		$	0.16

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

Manning & Napier, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)


	Three months ended September 30,				Nine months ended September 30,				Three months ended March 31,
	2014		2013		2014		2013		2015			2014
Net income attributable to controlling and noncontrolling interests	$	19,820	$	22,793	$	55,199	$	57,782	$	36,111		$	17,644
Net unrealized holding loss on investment securities, net of tax									(1		)	—
Reclassification adjustment for realized losses on investment securities included in net income	—		—		1		—		—			1
Comprehensive income	$	19,820	$	22,793	$	55,200	$	57,782	$	36,110		$	17,645
Less: Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests	19,392		21,479		$	53,992	$	55,864	32,801			17,564
Comprehensive income attributable to Manning & Napier, Inc.	$	428	$	1,314	$	1,208	$	1,918	$	3,309		$	81

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

Manning & Napier, Inc.

Consolidated ~~Statement~~Statements of Shareholders’ Equity

(In thousands, except share data)

(Unaudited)


	Common Stock – class A			Common Stock – class B			Additional Paid in Capital				Retained Deficit				Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)				Non Controlling Interests								Common Stock – class A						Common Stock – class B							Additional Paid in Capital				Retained Deficit				Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)				Non Controlling Interests
	Shares	Amount		Shares	Amount						Retained Deficit			Total					Non Controlling Interests			Shares			Amount				Shares			Amount							Total					Retained Deficit				Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)				Non Controlling Interests
Balance—December 31, 2013	13,634,246	$	136	1,000	$	—	Additional Paid in Capital			$	208,988			$	Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)		(40,544	)		$	(1	)		$	(22,790	)		$	145,789			13,634,246		$	136			1,000		Additional Paid in Capital			$	—			$	208,988			$	(40,544	)		$	(1	)		$	(22,790	)	$	145,789
Net income	—	—		—	—		—				1,208				—				53,991				55,199				—			—			—			—				—				81				—				17,563				17,644
Distributions to noncontrolling interests	—	—		—	—		—				—				—				(80,602		)		(80,602		)		—			—			—			—				—				—				—				(26,972		)		(26,972		)
Net changes in unrealized investment securities gains or losses	—	—		—	—		—				—				1				—				1				—			—			—			—				—				—				1				—				1
Common stock issued under equity compensation plan	71,173	1		—	—		(1		)		—				—				—				—
Issuance of stock for restricted stock grants																											13,923			—			—			—				—				—				—				—				—
Equity-based compensation	—	—		—	—		9,735				—				—				58,406				68,141				—			—			—			—				3,165				—				—				19,519				22,684
Dividends declared on Class A common stock - $0.48 per share	—	—		—	—		—				(6,569		)		—				—				(6,569		)
Purchase of Class A units of Manning & Napier Group, LLC held by noncontrolling interests (Note 4)	—	—		—	—		(5,652		)		—				—				(26,531		)		(32,183		)
Balance—September 30, 2014	13,705,419	$	137	1,000	$	—	$	213,070			$	(45,905	)		$	—			$	(17,526	)		$	149,776
Dividends declared on Class A common stock - $0.16 per share																											—			—			—			—				—				(2,184		)		—				—				(2,184		)
Purchase of Class A units of Manning & Napier Group, LLC held by noncontrolling interests																											—			—			—			—				(3,856		)		—				—				(26,472		)		(30,328		)
Balance—March 31, 2014																											13,648,169			$	136		1,000			$	—			$	208,297			$	(42,647	)		$	—			$	(39,152	)		$	126,634

Balance—December 31, 2014																											13,713,540			$	137		1,000			$	—			$	209,284			$	(41,087	)		$	—			$	(19,623	)		$	148,711
Net income																											—			—			—			—				—				3,309				—				32,802				36,111
Distributions to noncontrolling interests																											—			—			—			—				—				—				—				(26,787		)		(26,787		)
Net changes in unrealized investment securities gains or losses																											—			—			—			—				—				—				(1		)		—				(1		)
Equity-based compensation																											—			—			—			—				85				—				—				502				587
Dividends declared on Class A common stock - $0.16 per share																											—			—			—			—				—				(2,194		)		—				—				(2,194		)
Purchase of Class A units of Manning & Napier Group, LLC held by noncontrolling interests (Note 3)																											—			—			—			—				(4,394		)		—				—				(33,326		)		(37,720		)
Balance—March 31, 2015																											13,713,540			$	137		1,000			$	—			$	204,975			$	(39,972	)		$	(1	)		$	(46,432	)		$	118,707

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

Manning & Napier, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)


	Nine months ended September 30,						Three months ended March 31,
	2014			2013			2015			2014
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	55,199		$	57,782		$	36,111		$	17,644
Adjustment to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Equity-based compensation	68,141			63,762			587			22,684
Depreciation and amortization	1,643			1,419			642			477
Change in amounts payable under tax receivable agreement	(2,045		)	118			17			(2,110		)
Net losses (gains) on investment securities	446			(452		)
Net gains on investment securities							(613		)	(116		)
Deferred income taxes	3,743			1,911			720			3,478
(Increase) decrease in operating assets and increase (decrease) in operating liabilities:
Accounts receivable	(100		)	287			1,815			(222		)
Accounts receivable—Manning & Napier Fund, Inc.	(627		)	(948		)	2,334			40
Due from broker - consolidated funds							(5,000		)	—
Prepaid expenses and other assets	507			1,618			1,387			313
Accounts payable	746			(334		)	(1,245		)	(173		)
Accrued expenses and other liabilities	(7,532		)	(7,681		)	(16,856		)	(13,682		)
Deferred revenue	1,948			2,109			683			1,604
Other long-term liabilities	1,111			—			(71		)	449
Net cash provided by operating activities	123,180			119,591			20,511			30,386
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchase of property and equipment	(2,297		)	(1,286		)	(374		)	(773		)
Sale of investments	7,883			7,922			3,765			1,486
Purchase of investments	(12,855		)	(7,369		)	(1,998		)	(4,082		)
Due from broker	—			(5,850		)
Acquisitions, net of cash received	(2,068		)	—
Proceeds from maturity of investments	605			—			—			100
Net cash used in investing activities	(8,732		)	(6,583		)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities							1,393			(3,269		)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Distributions to noncontrolling interests	(80,602		)	(80,959		)	(26,787		)	—
Dividends paid on Class A common stock	(7,648		)	(6,528		)	(3,291		)	(3,272		)
Payment of shares withheld to satisfy withholding requirements							(64		)	—
Payment of capital lease obligations	(190		)	(138		)	(51		)	(60		)
Purchase of Class A units of Manning & Napier Group, LLC	(32,401		)	(7,413		)	(36,326		)	(30,328		)
Net cash used in financing activities	(120,841		)	(95,038		)	(66,519		)	(33,660		)
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents	(6,393		)	17,970
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents							(44,615		)	(6,543		)
Cash and cash equivalents:
Beginning of period	125,250			108,324			124,992			125,250
End of period	$	118,857		$	126,294		$	80,377		$	118,707

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

Manning & Napier, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 1—Organization and Nature of the Business

Manning & Napier, Inc. ("Manning & Napier", or the "Company") provides a broad range of investment solutions through separately managed accounts, mutual funds, and collective investment trusts, as well as a variety of consultative services that complement its investment process. Founded in 1970, the Company offers equity, fixed income and alternative strategies, as well as a range of blended asset portfolios, such as life cycle funds. Headquartered in Fairport, New York, the Company serves a diversified client base of high net worth individuals and institutions, including 401(k) plans, pension plans, Taft-Hartley plans, endowments and foundations.

The Company is the sole managing member of Manning & Napier Group, LLC ~~(together with~~and its subsidiaries ~~"Manning~~("Manning & Napier Group"), a holding company for the investment management businesses conducted by its operating subsidiaries. The diagram below depicts the Company's organization structure as of ~~September 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015.


(1)	The operating subsidiaries of Manning & Napier Group include Manning & Napier Advisors, LLC ("MNA"), Exeter Advisors I, LLC, Manning & Napier Alternative Opportunities, LLC, Perspective Partners LLC, Manning & Napier Information Services, LLC, Manning & Napier Benefits, LLC, Manning & Napier Investor Services, Inc. and Exeter Trust Company.

Note 2—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Critical Accounting Policies

There have been no significant changes in our critical accounting policies and estimates from those that were disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2013~~2014.

The Company believes that the disclosures herein are adequate so that the information presented is not misleading; however, these financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the notes thereto in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2013~~2014. The financial data for the interim periods may not necessarily be indicative of results for future interim periods or for the full year.

~~Basis of Presentation~~

Manning & Napier, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) and related rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) for interim financial reporting and include all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair statement of the results for the interim period.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates or assumptions that affect the reported amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Actual results could differ from these estimates or assumptions.

Principles of Consolidation

As of ~~September 30, 2014,~~March 31, 2015, Manning & Napier holds an approximately ~~14.5%~~15.6% economic interest in Manning & Napier Group but, as managing member, controls all of the business and affairs of Manning & Napier Group. As a result, the Company consolidates the financial results of Manning & Napier Group and records a noncontrolling interest on its consolidated statements of financial condition with respect to the remaining economic interest in Manning & Napier Group held by Manning & Napier Group Holdings, LLC (“M&N Group Holdings”) and Manning & Napier Capital Company, LLC (“MNCC”).

All material intercompany transactions ~~have~~ have been eliminated in consolidation.

In accordance with Accounting Standards Codification ("ASU") 2009-17, Consolidation (Topic 810) – Improvements to Financial Reporting by Enterprises Involved with Variable Interest Entities, the determination of whether a company is required to consolidate an entity is based on, among other things, an entity’s purpose and design, a company’s ability to direct the activities of the entity that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance, and whether a company is obligated to absorb losses or receive benefits that could potentially be significant to the entity. The standard also requires ongoing assessments of whether a company is the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity (“VIE”). In January 2010, the FASB deferred portions of ASU 2009-17 that relate to certain investment companies. WeThe Company determined that ~~all~~certain entities for which ~~we are~~it is the investment manager and/or general partner, qualify for the scope deferral and will continue to be assessed for consolidation under prior accounting guidance for consolidation of VIEs.

~~We provide~~The Company provides seed capital to ~~our~~its investment teams to develop new products and services for ~~our~~its clients. ~~Our~~The original seed investment typically represents all or a majority of the equity investment in the new product. ~~We evaluate our~~Pursuant to U.S. GAAP, the Company evaluates its seed investments on a regular basis and ~~consolidate~~consolidates such investments ~~as required pursuant to U.S. GAAP.~~for which it holds a controlling financial interest.

~~MNA~~The Company serves as the investment adviser for Manning & Napier Fund, Inc. series of mutual funds (the “Fund”) and the Exeter Trust Company Collective Investment ~~Trust~~Trusts (“CIT”). The Fund and CIT are legal entities, the business and affairs of which are managed by their respective boards of directors. As a result, each of these entities is a voting interest entity (“VOE”). While the Company holds, in limited cases, direct investments in a fund (which are made on the same terms as are available to other investors and do not represent a majority voting interest in any fund), the Company does not have a controlling financial interest or a majority voting interest and, as such, does not consolidate these entities.

~~On May 22, 2014 MNA became the investment advisor of the MN Xenon Managed Futures Offshore Fund, Ltd. ("Offshore Fund") and~~The Company is the General Partner of the MN Xenon Managed Futures Fund LP ("LP Fund") ~~(Note 3)~~. The Offshore Fund is a legal entity that is subject to oversight by its board of directors. Equity holders maintain the right to attend and vote at all general meetings and therefore the voting interest model is applied to determine consolidation. Since the Company does not have any direct investments or control in the Offshore Fund, it does not consolidate this entity.

The Company has determined that the LP Fund is not a VIE as (a) ~~the~~ the entity has enough equity to finance its activities without additional financial support and (b) the limited partners, as a group, have the ability to remove the general partner ("kick-out rights") with a majority vote of partnership percentage. Under the voting interest model, the Company does not consolidate VOEs in which the presumption of control by the general partner is overcome by kick-out rights.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents are primarily held in operating accounts at major financial institutions and also in money market securities. Cash equivalents are stated at cost, which approximates market value due to the short-term maturity of these investments. The fair value of cash equivalents have been classified as Level 1 in accordance with the fair value hierarchy.

Due from broker

The Company and its consolidated funds conducts business with brokers for certain of its investment activities. The due from broker ~~balance~~balances on the consolidated statements of financial condition represents cash held by brokers as collateral for managed ~~futures and cash at brokers as collateral for securities sold, not yet purchased.~~futures.

Investment Securities

Manning & Napier, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

~~Investment Securities~~

Investment securities are classified as either trading or available-for-sale and are carried at fair value. Fair value is determined based on quoted market prices in active markets for identical or similar instruments.

Investment securities classified as trading consist of equity securities, fixed income securities, and investments in mutual funds and hedge funds for which the Company provides advisory services. Realized and unrealized gains and losses on trading securities are recorded in net gains (losses) on investments in the consolidated statements of operations. ~~Realized gains and losses on sales of trading securities are computed on a specific identification basis.~~ At ~~September 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015, trading securities consist solely of investments held by the Company to provide initial cash seeding for product development purposes.

Securities sold, not yet purchased are recorded on the trade date, are stated at fair value and represent obligations of the Company to purchase the securities at prevailing market rates. Therefore, the future satisfaction of such obligations may be for an amount greater or less than the amounts recorded on the consolidated statements of financial condition. The ultimate gains or losses recognized are dependent upon the prices at which these securities are purchased to settle the obligations under the sales commitments. Realized gains and losses from covers of securities sold, not yet purchased transactions are included in net gain (loss) from investments on the consolidated statements of operations. Securities sold, not yet purchased are stated at fair value in accrued expenses and other liabilities in the consolidated statements of financial condition, with any unrealized gains or losses reported in current period earnings in net gain (loss) from investments on the consolidated statements of operations.

Operating Segments

The Company operates in one segment, the investment management industry. The Company primarily provides investment management services to separately managed accounts, mutual funds and collective investment trust funds. Management assesses the financial performance of these vehicles on a combined basis.

Revenue

The majority of the Company’s revenues are based on fees charged to manage customers’ portfolios. Investment management fees are generally computed as a percentage of assets under management ("AUM") and recognized as earned. Fees for providing investment advisory services are computed and billed in accordance with the provisions of the applicable investment management agreements. For the Company’s separately managed accounts, clients either pay investment management fees in advance, typically for a semi-annual or quarterly period, or in arrears, typically for a monthly or quarterly period. When investment management fees are paid in advance, the Company defers the revenue and recognizes it over the applicable period. When investment management fees are paid in arrears, the Company estimates revenues based on AUM market values as of the most recent month end date, and adjusts to actual when billed. For mutual funds and collective investment trust vehicles, the Company’s fees are calculated and earned daily based on AUM.

Certain investment advisory contracts provide for a performance-based fee, in addition to a base investment management fee, which is calculated as a percentage of cumulative profits over and above the aggregate of previous period cumulative profits. Performance-based fees are recorded as a component of revenue at the end of each contract’s measurement period, when all contingencies are resolved, typically on a quarterly basis. For the three months ended March 31, 2015, the Company recognized approximately $0.1 million in performance fee income.

The Company has agreements with third parties who provide distribution and administrative services for its mutual funds, collective investment trusts and certain separately managed accounts. Third party agreements are evaluated against Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") ASC 605-45 Revenue Recognition - Principal Agent Considerations to determine whether revenue should be reported gross or net of payments to third-party service providers. In management's judgment there are various indicators that support gross revenue reporting, the most notable being the Company acts as primary obligor and therefore principal service provider. Based on this evaluation, investment management service revenue is recorded gross of distribution and administrative fees paid to third parties.

Advisory Agreements

The Company derives significant revenue from its role as advisor to the Fund and the CIT.

The Company's investments in the Fund amounted to approximately $~~1.7~~0.2 million as of ~~September 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 and December 31, ~~2013~~2014.

Fees earned for advisory related services provided to the Fund and CIT investment vehicles were approximately ~~$56.5~~$45.2 million and ~~$164.6~~$52.1 million for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2015 and 2014, ~~respectively, and $50.0 million and $144.8 million for the~~ ~~three and nine~~ ~~months ended September 30, 2013,~~ respectively. These amounts represent greater than 10% of the Company's revenue in each respective period.

Manning & Napier, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In February 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-02, Consolidation (Topic 810): Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis. The ASU modifies existing consolidation guidance for determining whether certain legal entities should be consolidated. The new guidance will be effective on January 1, 2016, and requires either a retrospective or a modified retrospective approach to adoption. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), which supersedes existing accounting standards for revenue recognition and creates a single framework. The new guidance will be effective on January 1, ~~2017~~2018 and requires either a retrospective or a modified retrospective approach to adoption. Early application is prohibited. The Company is currently evaluating its transition method and the potential impact on its consolidated financial statements.

Note 3—~~Acquisitions~~

On May 22, 2014, the Company acquired the operating assets of 2100 Xenon LLC ("Xenon"), an alternative investment manager specializing in managed futures and global macro strategies for institutional and individual clients.

~~The acquisition was accounted for under the acquisition method of accounting in accordance with ASC 805 "Business Combinations~~." Accordingly, goodwill was measured as the excess of the acquisition-date fair value of the consideration transferred over the amount of acquisition-date identifiable assets acquired net of assumed liabilities. The Company recorded $0.8 million of intangible assets and $0.9 million of goodwill, all of which are deductible for U.S. tax purposes, in other long term assets in the consolidated statement of financial condition. In management's opinion, the goodwill represents the value expected from the synergies created through the integration of Xenon's operations, as well as the reputation and expertise of Xenon in the asset management industry.

~~The results of operations of Xenon have been included in the Company's results prospectively from the date of acquisition.~~

~~Note 4—~~Noncontrolling Interests

Manning & Napier holds an approximately ~~14.5%~~15.6% economic interest in Manning & Napier Group, but as managing member controls all of the business and affairs of Manning & Napier Group. As a result, the Company consolidates the financial results of Manning & Napier Group and records a noncontrolling interest on its consolidated statement of financial condition with respect to the remaining approximately ~~85.5%~~84.4% aggregate economic interest in Manning & Napier Group held by M&N Group Holdings and MNCC. Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests on the statements of operations represents the portion of earnings or loss attributable to the economic interest in Manning & Napier Group held by the noncontrolling interests.

The following provides a reconciliation from “Income before provision for income taxes” to “Net income attributable to Manning & Napier, Inc.”:


	Three months ended September 30,						Nine months ended September 30,						Three months ended March 31,
	2014			2013			2014			2013			2015			2014
	(in thousands)												(in thousands)
Income before provision for income taxes	$	22,796		$	25,015		$	65,611		$	64,581		$	38,590		$	22,720
Less: gain (loss) before provision for income taxes of Manning & Napier, Inc. (a)	(87		)	(270		)	2,015			(833		)
Less: (loss) gain before provision for income taxes of Manning & Napier, Inc. (a)													(18		)	2,105
Income before provision for income taxes, as adjusted	22,883			25,285			63,596			65,414			38,608			20,615
Controlling interest percentage (b)	14.5		%	13.9		%	14.3		%	13.9		%	14.5		%	14.0		%
Net income attributable to controlling interest	3,318			3,526			9,086			9,100			5,614			2,876
Plus: gain (loss) before provision for income taxes of Manning & Napier, Inc. (a)	(87		)	(270		)	2,015			(833		)
Plus: (loss) gain before provision for income taxes of Manning & Napier, Inc. (a)													(18		)	2,105
Income before income taxes attributable to Manning & Napier, Inc.	3,231			3,256			11,101			8,267			5,596			4,981
Less: provision for income taxes of Manning & Napier, Inc. (c)	2,803			1,942			9,893			6,349			2,287			4,900
Net income attributable to Manning & Napier, Inc.	$	428		$	1,314		$	1,208		$	1,918		$	3,309		$	81

________________________


a)	Manning & Napier, Inc. incurs certain gains or expenses that are only attributable to it and are therefore excluded from the net income attributable to noncontrolling interests.

~~Manning & Napier, Inc.~~

~~Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)~~


b)	Income before provision for income taxes is allocated to the controlling interest based on the percentage of units of Manning & Napier Group held by Manning & Napier, Inc. The amount represents the Company's weighted ownership of Manning & Napier Group for the respective periods.

The consolidated provision for income taxes is equal to the sum of (i) the provision for income taxes for entities other than Manning & Napier, Inc. and (ii) the provision for income taxes of Manning & Napier, Inc. which includes all U.S. federal and state income taxes. The consolidated provision for income taxes totaled approximately $~~3.0~~2.5 million and ~~$2.2~~$5.1 million for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 and ~~2013, respectively. The consolidated provision for income taxes totaled approximately $10.4 million and $6.8 million for the nine months ended~~ ~~September 30,~~ 2014, ~~and 2013,~~ respectively.

~~Noncontrolling interests as~~

Pursuant to the exchange agreement entered into at the time of ~~and for~~ the ~~nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, included the following amounts:~~

Nine months ended September 30,
2014 2013
(in thousands)
Balance, beginning of period $ (22,790 ) $ (41,115 )
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests 53,991
55,864
Distributions to noncontrolling interests (80,602 ) (80,959 )
Equity-based compensation 58,406
54,892
Purchase of Class A units of Manning & Napier Group, LLC held by noncontrolling interests (26,531 ) (6,493 )
Balance, end of period $ (17,526 ) $ (17,811 )

~~On March 31, 2014,~~Company's 2011 initial public offering ("IPO"), M&N Group Holdings and MNCC exchanged a total of ~~2,098,837~~3,161,502 Class A units of Manning & Napier Group on March 31, 2015 for approximately ~~$30.3~~$36.3 million in cash. Subsequent to the exchange, the Class A units were retired. In addition, on ~~May 29, 2014, M&N Group Holdings exchanged a total of 187,848~~March 31, 2015, the Company purchased and retired 2,516,352 unvested Class A units of Manning & Napier ~~Group. In connection with the exchange,~~ Group held by M&N Group

Manning & Napier, ~~issued 56,000 shares of Class A common stock~~Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Holdings and ~~paid approximately $2.1 million in cash~~MNCC at a predetermined cost basis for ~~the remaining 131,848 units. The exchange of 187,848 Class A units on May 29, 2014 gave rise to a deferred tax asset of~~ approximately $1.4 million ~~and a corresponding liability of approximately $1.2 million pursuant~~in cash. These units were subject to ~~the tax receivable agreement ("TRA") which the Company entered into~~performance-based vesting criteria in connection with the ~~Company's~~ 2011 ~~initial public offering ("IPO"). The initial estimate for the deferred tax asset, net~~reorganization transactions and did not vest. These acquisitions of ~~the liability~~additional operating membership interests were treated as reorganizations of entities under ~~the TRA is recorded within paid-in capital.~~common control as required by ASC 805 "Business Combinations".

As a result of the aforementioned transactions, the Company's economic ownership interest in Manning & Napier Group increased to ~~14.5%~~15.6%. As of ~~September 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015, M&N Group Holdings and MNCC may exchange an aggregate of ~~73,574,338~~67,896,484 units of Manning & Napier Group for shares of the Company's Class A common stock pursuant to the terms of the exchange agreement entered into at the time of the Company's 2011 IPO.

~~During the~~ ~~nine months endedSeptember 30, 2014~~ ~~and~~ ~~2013, the Company distributed approximately~~ ~~$80.6 million~~ ~~and $81.0 million, respectively, to noncontrolling interests. None of these distributions are payments pursuant to the TRA.~~

At ~~September 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 and December 31, ~~2013~~2014, the Company had recorded a liability of $~~41.2~~41.3 million and ~~$44.0~~$41.2 million,, respectively, representing the estimated payments due to the selling unit holders under the ~~TRA.~~tax receivable agreement ("TRA") entered into between Manning & Napier and the holders of Manning & Group. Of these amounts, $2.1 ~~million and $2.0~~ million were included in accrued expenses and other liabilities at ~~September 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 and December 31, ~~2013~~2014, respectively. The Company made no payments pursuant to the TRA ~~of $2.0 million~~ during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 and ~~2013. The Company recorded an adjustment of $2.0 million to the amounts payable under the TRA during the~~ ~~nine months ended September 30, 2014, driven primarily by enacted changes in tax laws.~~2014.

Obligations pursuant to the TRA are obligations of Manning & Napier. They do not impact the noncontrolling interests. These obligations are not income tax obligations. Furthermore, the TRA has no impact on the allocation of the provision for income taxes to the Company’s net income.

During the three months endedMarch 31, 2015 and 2014, the Company distributed approximately $26.8 million and $27.0 million, respectively, to noncontrolling interests. None of these distributions are payments pursuant to the TRA.

Note 5—4—Investment Securities

~~Manning & Napier, Inc.~~

~~Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)~~

The following ~~table~~ represents the Company’s investment securities holdings as of ~~September 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 and December 31, ~~2013~~2014:


	September 30, 2014								March 31, 2015
	Cost		Unrealized Gains		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Cost		Unrealized Gains		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
	(in thousands)								(in thousands)
Available-for-sale securities
U.S. Treasury note (0.25%, 10/31/2015)	$	2,107	$	—	$	—	$	2,107

U.S. Treasury notes (0.25%, 10/31/2015)									$	2,107	$	—	$	(1	)	$	2,106
Trading securities
Equity securities							12,055									10,215
Fixed income securities							9,911									9,076
Managed mutual funds							1,709
Mutual funds																166
Hedge funds																3,647
							23,675									23,104
Total investment securities							$	25,782								$	25,210


		December 31, 2013									December 31, 2014
		Cost		Unrealized Gains		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value			Cost		Unrealized Gains		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value
		(in thousands)									(in thousands)
Available-for-sale securities
U.S. Treasury note (0.25%, 8/31/2014)		$	505	$	—	$	—	$	505
U.S. Treasury note (1.75%, 1/31/2014)		102		—		—		102
		607		—		—		607
U.S. Treasury notes (0.25%, 10/31/2015)											$	2,107	$	—	$	—	$	2,107
Trading securities
Equity securities	Equity securities							11,961									12,048
Fixed income securities	Fixed income securities							7,085		Fixed income securities							9,366
Managed mutual funds								1,668
Mutual funds																	168
Hedge funds																	3,226
								20,714									24,808
Total investment securities								$	21,321								$	26,915

Manning & Napier, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Investment securities classified as trading consist of equity securities, fixed income securities and investments in mutual funds and hedge funds for which the Company provides advisory services. At ~~September 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 and December 31, ~~2013~~2014, trading securities consist solely of investments held by the Company to provide initial cash seeding for product development purposes. The Company recognized approximately ~~$0.9~~$0.2 million ~~of net unrealized losses~~ and $0.5 million of net unrealized gains related to investments classified as trading during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 and ~~2013~~2014, respectively.

Investment securities classified as available-for-sale consist of U.S. Treasury notes for compliance with certain regulatory requirements. As of ~~September 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 and December 31, ~~2013~~2014, $0.6 million of these securities is considered restricted. The Company periodically reviews each individual security position that has an unrealized loss, or impairment, to determine if that impairment is other-than-temporary. No other-than-temporary impairment charges have been recognized by the Company during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 and ~~2013~~2014.

Note 6—5—Derivative Instruments

The Company enters into futures contracts for product development purposes. Futures are commitments either to purchase or sell a designated financial instrument, currency, commodity or an index at a specified future date for a specified price and may be settled in cash or another financial asset. Upon entering into a futures contract, the Company is required to pledge to the broker an amount of cash, which is reported in due from broker within the consolidated statements of financial condition. Futures contracts have little credit risk because the counterparties are futures exchanges. The Company does not hold any derivatives in a formal hedge relationship under ASC 815-10, Derivatives and Hedging.

~~Manning & Napier, Inc.~~

~~Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)~~

The following tables present the notional value and fair value as of ~~September 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 and December 31, ~~2013~~2014 for derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments:


	September 30, 2014							March 31, 2015
			Fair Value							Fair Value
	Notional Value		Asset Derivative		Liability Derivative			Notional Value		Asset Derivative		Liability Derivative
	(in thousands)							(in thousands)
Interest rate futures	$	126,640	$	71	$	(72	)	$	166,119	$	306	$	(240	)
Index futures	2,942		—		(58		)	2,035		37		(1		)
Commodity futures	2,686		49		(82		)	4,168		87		(38		)
Currency futures	6,455		56		(51		)	10,171		1		(140		)
Total derivatives	$	138,723	$	176	$	(263	)	$	182,493	$	431	$	(419	)


	December 31, 2013							December 31, 2014
			Fair Value						Fair Value
	Notional Value		Asset Derivative		Liability Derivative			Notional Value	Asset Derivative	Liability Derivative
	(in thousands)							(in thousands)
Interest rate futures	$	123,164	$	217	$	(66	)	106,932	162	(60	)
Index futures								2,032	51	(16	)
Commodity futures								3,506	41	(76	)
Currency futures								10,017	162	(17	)
Total derivatives	$	123,164	$	217	$	(66	)	122,487	416	(169	)

As of ~~September 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 and December 31, ~~2013,~~2014, the derivative assets and liabilities are measured at fair value and are included in due from broker in the consolidated statements of financial condition, with changes in the fair value reported in net gains (losses) on investments in the consolidated statements of operations. For the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2014,~~March 31, 2015, the average volume of derivative activity (measured in terms of notional value) was approximately ~~$130.1 million~~.$199.9 million. The following table presents the gains (losses) recognized in net gains (losses) on investments in the consolidated statements of operations for

Manning & Napier, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 and ~~2013:~~2014:


	Three months ended September 30,						Nine months ended September 30,						Three months ended March 31,
	2014			2013			2014			2013			2015		2014
	(in thousands)												(in thousands)
Interest rate futures	$	12		$	(13	)	$	(544	)	$	(13	)	$	118	$	(365	)
Index futures	(54		)	—			15			—			71		—
Commodity futures	50			—			(10		)	—			20		—
Currency futures	(58		)	—			(23		)	—			294		—
Balance as of end of period	$	(50	)	$	(13	)	$	(562	)	$	(13	)	$	503	$	(365	)

The Company discloses information about offsetting and related arrangements to enable users of its financial statements to understand the effect of those arrangements on its financial position in accordance with ASU 2011-11, Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities. The derivatives instruments are subject to a master netting agreement allowing for the netting of assets and liabilities on the consolidated statements of financial position.

The following table presents the offsetting of ~~interest rate~~managed futures as of ~~September 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 and December 31, ~~2013:~~2014:

Gross Amounts of Recognized Liabilities Gross Amounts Offset in the Statement of Financial Position Net Amounts of Assets (Liabilities) Presented in the Statement of Financial Position Financial Instruments Cash Collateral Received (Pledged) Net Amount
(in thousands)
September 30, 2014 $ (263 ) $ 176
$ (87 ) $ —
$ (87 ) $ —
December 31, 2013 $ (66 ) $ 217
$ 151
$ —
$ —
$ 151



	Gross Amounts of Recognized Liabilities			Gross Amounts Offset in the Statement of Financial Position		Net Amounts of Assets (Liabilities) Presented in the Statement of Financial Position		Financial Instruments		Cash Collateral Received (Pledged)		Net Amount
	(in thousands)
March 31, 2015	$	(419	)	$	431	$	12	$	—	$	—	$	12
December 31, 2014	$	(169	)	$	416	$	247	$	—	$	—	$	247

Note 7—6—Fair Value Measurements

~~Manning & Napier, Inc.~~

~~Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)~~

Fair value is defined as the price that the Company would receive upon selling an investment in an orderly transaction to an independent buyer in the principal or most advantageous market of the investment. A fair value hierarchy is provided that gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3).

The following three-tier fair value hierarchy prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value:

•Level 1—observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets for identical securities;

Level 2—other significant observable inputs (including but not limited to quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment rates, credit risk, etc.); and

Level 3—significant unobservable inputs (including the Company’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments).

Manning & Napier, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

The following provides the hierarchy of inputs used to derive the fair value of the Company’s financial instruments as of ~~September 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 and December 31, ~~2013~~2014:


	September 30, 2014								March 31, 2015
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Totals		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Totals
	(in thousands)								(in thousands)
Equity securities	$	12,055	$	—	$	—	$	12,055	$	10,215	$	—	$	—	$	10,215
Fixed income securities	1,214		8,697		—		9,911		1,100		7,976		—		9,076
Managed mutual funds	1,709		—		—		1,709
Mutual funds									166		—		—		166
Hedge funds									—		3,647		—		3,647
U.S. Treasury notes	—		2,107		—		2,107		—		2,106		—		2,106
Derivatives	176		—		—		176		431		—		—		431
Total assets at fair value	$	15,154	$	10,804	$	—	$	25,958	$	11,912	$	13,729	$	—	$	25,641

Securities sold, not yet purchased	$	1,063	$	—	$	—	$	1,063
Derivatives	263		—		—		263		$	419	$	—	$	—	$	419
Total liabilities at fair value	$	1,326	$	—	$	—	$	1,326	$	419	$	—	$	—	$	419


	December 31, 2013								December 31, 2014
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Totals		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Totals
	(in thousands)								(in thousands)
Equity securities	$	11,961	$	—	$	—	$	11,961	$	12,048	$	—	$	—	$	12,048
Fixed income securities	1,220		5,865		—		7,085		1,154		8,212		—		9,366
Managed mutual funds	1,668		—		—		1,668
Mutual funds									168		—		—		168
Hedge funds									—		3,226		—		3,226
U.S. Treasury notes	—		607		—		607		—		2,107		—		2,107
Derivatives	217		—		—		217		416		—		—		416
Total assets at fair value	$	15,066	$	6,472	$	—	$	21,538	$	13,786	$	13,545	$	—	$	27,331

Securities sold, not yet purchased	$	777	$	—	$	—	$	777	$	964	$	—	$	—	$	964
Derivatives	66		—		—		66		169		—		—		169
Total liabilities at fair value	$	843	$	—	$	—	$	843	$	1,133	$	—	$	—	$	1,133

Valuations of investments in fixed income securities and U.S. Treasury notes can generally be obtained through independent pricing services. For most bond types, the pricing service utilizes matrix pricing, which considers one or more of the following factors: yield or price of bonds of comparable quality, coupon, maturity, current cash flows, type and current day trade information, as well as dealer supplied prices. These valuations are categorized as Level 2 in the hierarchy.

The Company relies on the net asset value of certain hedge fund investments as their fair value. The net asset values have been derived from the fair values of underlying futures contracts as of the respective reporting dates. Redemptions may occur monthly at the net asset value and are therefore categorized as Level 2 in the hierarchy.

There were no Level 3 securities held by the Company at ~~September 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 or December 31, ~~2013~~2014.

~~Manning & Napier, Inc.~~

~~Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)~~

The Company’s policy is to recognize transfers in and transfers out of the valuation levels as of the beginning of the reporting period. There were no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 securities during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015.

Manning & Napier, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 8—7—Accrued Expenses and Other Liabilities

Accrued expenses and other liabilities as of ~~September 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 and December 31, ~~2013~~2014 consisted of the following:


	September 30, 2014		December 31, 2013		March 31, 2015		December 31, 2014
	(in thousands)				(in thousands)
Accrued bonus and sales commissions	$	21,323	$	28,305	$	12,396	$	28,801
Accrued payroll and benefits	2,817		2,970		2,545		3,424
Accrued sub-transfer agent fees	9,476		8,081		7,801		8,108
Dividends payable	2,193		3,272		2,194		3,291
Amounts payable under tax receivable agreement	2,091		1,955		2,100		2,100
Securities sold, not yet purchased	1,063		777		—		964
Other accruals and liabilities	4,766		4,453		6,155		4,091
	$	43,729	$	49,813	$	33,191	$	50,779

Note 9—8—Line of Credit

On February 13, 2013, the Company and Manning & Napier Group executed a Daily Adjusting LIBOR Revolving Line Note (the "Note") with M&T Bank. The Note has an original principal amount of $10.0 million and bears an interest rate of 1.50 percentage points above the greater of (a) one-month LIBOR, adjusting daily, or (b) one-day (i.e., overnight) LIBOR. The Note is unsecured and is payable on demand. If the Company fails to make payment when due under the Note, the default rate on the outstanding balance shall be 5 percentage points per year above the otherwise applicable rate per year. The Company has not drawn any loans under the Note.

Note ~~10—~~9—Commitments and Contingencies

The Company may from time to time enter into agreements that contain certain representations and warranties and which provide general indemnifications. The Company may also serve as a guarantor of such obligations of one or more of the Manning & Napier Group entities. The Company’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown, as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Company that have not yet occurred. The Company expects any risk of liability associated with such guarantees to be remote.

Regulation

As an investment adviser to a variety of investment products, the Company and its affiliated broker-dealer are subject to routine reviews and inspections by the SEC, Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc., National Futures Association and U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission. From time to time, the Company may also be subject to claims, be involved in various legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of its business and be subject to other contingencies. The Company does not believe that the outcome of any of these reviews, inspections or other legal proceedings will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements; however, litigation is subject to many uncertainties, and the outcome of individual litigated matters is difficult to predict. The Company will establish accruals for matters that are probable, can be reasonably estimated, and may take into account any related insurance recoveries to the extent of such recoveries. ~~Currently, there are no legal proceedings pending or, to the Company’s knowledge, threatened against it.~~ As of ~~September 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 and December 31, ~~2013~~2014, the Company has not accrued for any such claims, legal proceedings, or other contingencies.

Note ~~11—~~10—Earnings per Common Share

Basic earnings per share (“basic EPS”) is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of shares outstanding for the reporting period. Diluted earnings per share (“diluted EPS”) gives effect during the reporting period to other potentially dilutive shares outstanding.

Manning & Napier, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

The following is a reconciliation of the income and share data used in the basic and diluted earnings per share computations for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 and ~~2013~~2014:


	Three months ended September 30,				Nine months ended September 30,				Three months ended March 31,
	2014		2013		2014		2013		2015		2014
	(in thousands, except share data)								(in thousands, except share data)
Net income attributable to controlling and noncontrolling interests	$	19,820	$	22,793	$	55,199	$	57,782	$	36,111	$	17,644
Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interests	19,392		21,479		53,991		55,864		32,802		17,563
Net income attributable to Manning & Napier, Inc.	$	428	$	1,314	$	1,208	$	1,918	$	3,309	$	81

Weighted average shares of Class A common stock outstanding - basic	13,705,134		13,634,246		13,669,391		13,612,289		13,713,540		13,634,401
Dilutive effect from restricted stock units	224,886		56,395		153,011		61,210		201,368		117,289
Weighted average shares of Class A common stock outstanding - diluted	13,930,020		13,690,641		13,822,402		13,673,499		13,914,908		13,751,690
Net income available to Class A common stock per share - basic	$	0.03	$	0.10	$	0.09	$	0.14	$	0.24	$	0.01
Net income available to Class A common stock per share - diluted	$	0.03	$	0.10	$	0.09	$	0.14	$	0.24	$	0.01

~~For~~At March 31, 2015, the ~~nine months ended September 30, 2014, a total of 282,247 shares of Class A common stock issuable upon the assumed conversion of~~Company had outstanding under its 2011 Equity Compensation Plan 181,378 restricted stock units that have a performance condition. These units were ~~excluded from~~not included in the calculation of diluted ~~net income available to Class A~~earnings per common ~~stock per~~ share ~~as the effect of including these shares for the respective periods would have been anti-dilutive.~~

~~In addition,~~ for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended September 30, 2014, a total of 181,378 shares of Class A common stock issuable upon the assumed conversion of restricted stock units were excluded from the calculation of diluted net income available to Class A common stock per share, asMarch 31, 2015 because the performance conditions ~~of these awards~~ were not ~~satisfied as of September 30, 2014.~~satisfied.

At ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2015 and March 31, 2014 there were ~~73,574,338~~67,896,484 and 73,762,186, respectively, Class A Units of Manning & Napier Group outstanding which, subject to certain restrictions, may be exchangeable for up to ~~73,574,338~~67,896,484 and 73,762,186, respectively, shares of the Company’s Class A common stock. The restrictions set forth in the exchange agreement were in place at the end of ~~the current~~each respective reporting period. ~~As such, these~~These units were not included in the calculation of diluted earnings per common share for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2015 and 2014. because the effect would have been anti-dilutive.

The Company’s Class B common stock represent voting interests and do not participate in the earnings of the Company. Accordingly, there is no basic or diluted EPS related to the Company’s Class B common stock.

~~Manning & Napier, Inc.~~

~~Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)~~

Note ~~12—~~11—Equity Based Compensation

~~2011 Equity Compensation Plan~~

~~During the nine months ended September 30, 2014, 534,798 equity awards were issued under the~~The 2011 Equity Compensation Plan (the ~~"2011~~"Equity Plan")~~. Of these awards, 56,000 related~~ was adopted by the Company's board of directors and approved by the Company's stockholders prior to the ~~redemption~~consummation of ~~previously~~the IPO. A total of 13,142,813 equity interests are authorized for issuance. The equity interests may be issued ~~and outstanding~~in the form of the Company's Class A common stock, restricted stock units, units of Manning & Napier Group, ~~that were granted prior to the initial public offering, which were subsequently re-issued as Class A common stock. The remaining 478,798 represent newly issued awards, consisting~~or certain classes of 15,173 shares of Class A common stock and 463,625 restricted stock units. The Class A common stock awards vested immediately, and 282,247 of the restricted stock units will vest on the third anniversary of the grant date. The remaining 181,378 of the restricted stock units will vest over a three-year service period, subject to achievement of certain revenue objectives. As such, these awards are considered to have a performance condition andmembership interests in the Company ~~will periodically assess~~ which ~~outcomes are probable~~may convert into units of ~~achievement to ensure that compensation cost recognized for these awards reflects the number of awards that are ultimately expected to vest.~~Manning & Napier Group.

The following table summarizes stock award activity for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 under the ~~2011~~Company's Equity Plan:


	Restricted Stock Awards		Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value		Restricted Stock Awards		Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
Stock awards outstanding at January 1, 2014	416,917		$	15.63
Stock awards outstanding at January 1, 2015					855,009		$	15.32
Granted	534,798		$	15.29	—		$	—
Vested	(71,173	)	$	16.66	—		$	—
Forfeited	(12,780	)	$	15.60	(12,780	)	$	15.60
Stock awards outstanding at September 30, 2014	867,762		$	15.34
Stock awards outstanding at March 31, 2015					842,229		$	15.31

There were no awards granted during the three months ended March 31, 2015. The weighted average grant date fair value of ~~2011~~Equity Plan awards granted during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2014 ~~and 2013~~ was ~~$15.29~~ ~~and $15.83, respectively,~~$16.16, based on the closing sale price of Manning & Napier Inc.'s Class A common stock as reported on the New York Stock Exchange on the date of grant, and reduced by the present value of the dividends expected to be paid on the underlying shares during the requisite service period. For such awards that vest over time, recipients are not entitled to dividends declared on the underlying shares of Class A common stock until the awards vest.

For the ~~three and~~ ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2015 and 2014,, the Company recorded approximately $~~0.9~~0.6 million and ~~$2.2~~$0.8 million, ~~of compensation expense related to awards granted under the 2011 Plan. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, the Company recorded approximately $0.6 million and $1.1 million~~respectively, of compensation expense related to awards under the ~~2011~~Equity Plan.

~~The aggregate intrinsic value of 2011 Plan awards that vested during~~For the ~~nine months~~three-months ended ~~September 30, 2014~~ ~~was approximately $1.2 million. As of~~ ~~September 30, 2014~~, there was unrecognized compensation expense related to 2011 Plan awards of approximately $7.0 million, which the Company expects to recognize over a weighted average period of approximately 2.1 years.

~~Reorganization-Related Equity Based Compensation~~

~~The following table summarizes service-based stock unit activity for the~~ ~~nine months ended September 30, 2014~~ ~~specific to the 2011 reorganization transactions:~~

Service-Based
Stock Units
Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
Stock unit awards outstanding at January 1, 2014 1,458,049
$ 12.00
Granted —
$ —
Vested —
$ —
Forfeited —
$ —
Stock unit awards outstanding at September 30, 2014 1,458,049
$ 12.00

~~In addition to the service-based stock unit activity above, during~~March 31, 2014, the Company ~~also commenced recognition of compensation expense for~~recognized approximately 4.1 million performance-based awards eligible to vest on December 31, 2014 under the vesting terms of ownership interests in connection with the 2011 reorganization transactions. Vesting of these performance-based awards iscontingent upon the satisfaction of annual performance criteria specific to each award recipient. The determination of whether an award recipient has met such performance criteria will be made at the end of the annual service period. In accordance with Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718, ~~Stock Compensation, the grant date for these performance-based awards will occur at the end of the service period. Until the grant date, compensation expense will be re-~~

~~Manning & Napier, Inc.~~

~~Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)~~

~~measured at the end of each reporting period, to the extent that service has been rendered in proportion to the total requisite service period.~~

~~The following table summarizes performance-based stock unit activity for the~~ ~~nine months ended September 30, 2014~~ ~~specific to the 2011 reorganization transactions:~~

Performance-Based
Stock Units
Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
Stock unit awards outstanding at January 1, 2014 —
$ —
Granted 37,577
$ 16.78
Vested (37,577 ) $ 16.78
Forfeited —
$ —
Stock unit awards outstanding at September 30, 2014 —
$ —

~~For the three and~~ ~~nine months ended September 30, 2014, the Company recorded approximately~~ ~~$20.8 million~~ ~~and $66.0~~$21.9 million of compensation expense related to the vesting terms of ownership interests in connection with the 2011 reorganization transactions. ~~For the three and~~ ~~nine months ended September 30, 2014, approximately~~ ~~$4.5 million~~ ~~and $13.4 million is attributable to the service-based awards. For the same periods, the remaining expense of approximately~~ ~~$16.3 million~~ ~~and $52.5 million is attributable to performance-based awards. For the three and~~ ~~nine months ended September 30, 2014~~, ~~$16.3 million~~ and $51.9 million of the expense attributable to performance-based awards is related to awards eligible to vest on December 31, 2014 under the vesting terms of ownership interests in connection with the 2011 reorganization transactions. As discussed above, this expense is based upon the closing sale price of

Manning & Napier, Inc.~~’s Class A common stock as reported on the New York Stock Exchange on~~ ~~September 30, 2014~~.

~~For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, the Company recognized a total of approximately $18.2 million and $62.7 million, respectively, of compensation expense related~~Notes to the vesting terms of ownership interests in connection with the 2011 reorganization transactions. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, approximately $4.5 million and $15.1 million, respectively, was attributable to the service-based awards. For the same periods, the remaining expense of approximately $13.7 million and $47.5 million, respectively, was attributable to performance-based awards.Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

As of ~~September 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015, there was unrecognized compensation expense related to ~~unvested service-based~~Equity Plan awards of approximately ~~$2.2 million. The Company expects to recognize this expense over a weighted average period of 0.1 years.~~

~~As of September 30, 2014, there was unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested performance-based awards of approximately $17.3~~$5.2 million, which the Company expects to recognize over a weighted average period of ~~0.3~~approximately 1.7 years. ~~This estimate is based upon the closing sale price of Manning & Napier, Inc.’s Class A common stock as reported on September 30, 2014.~~

Note ~~13—~~12—Income Taxes

The Company is comprised of entities that have elected to be treated as either a limited liability company ("LLC") or a “C-Corporation". As such, the entities functioning as LLC’s are not liable for or able to benefit from U.S. federal and most state income taxes on their earnings, and earnings (losses) will be included in the personal income tax returns of each entity’s unit holders. The entities functioning as C-Corporations are liable for or able to benefit from U.S. federal and state and local income taxes on their earnings and losses, respectively.

The Company’s income tax provision and effective tax rate were as follows:


	Three months ended September 30,						Nine months ended September 30,						Three months ended March 31,
	2014			2013			2014			2013			2015			2014
	(in thousands)												(in thousands)
Earnings from continuing operations before income taxes	$	22,796		$	25,015		$	65,611		$	64,581		$	38,590		$	22,720
Effective tax rate	13.1		%	8.9		%	15.9		%	10.5		%	6.4		%	22.3		%
Provision for income taxes	2,976			2,222			10,412			6,799			2,479			5,076
Provision for income taxes @ 35%	7,979			8,755			22,964			22,603			13,507			7,952
Difference between tax at effective vs. statutory rate	$	(5,003	)	$	(6,533	)	$	(12,552	)	$	(15,804	)	$	(11,028	)	$	(2,876	)

For the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 and ~~2013~~2014, the difference between the Company’s recorded provision and the provision that would result from applying the U.S. statutory rate of 35% is primarily attributable to the benefit resulting from the fact that a significant portion of the Company’s operations include a series of flow-through entities which are generally not subject to federal and most state income taxes. Accordingly, a portion of the Company’s earnings are

~~Manning & Napier, Inc.~~

~~Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)~~

not subject to corporate level taxes. For the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2014, the benefit is partially offset by ~~the~~a $2.2 million impact ~~of a reduction to the Company's deferred tax asset as a result of~~from enacted changes in tax laws ~~during~~that lowered the ~~first quarter~~Company's expectation of ~~2014, which reduced expected~~the future tax ~~benefits.~~benefits under the tax receivable agreement.

Note ~~14—~~13—Related Party Transactions

Transactions with noncontrolling members

From time to time, the Company may be asked to provide certain services, including accounting, legal and other administrative functions for the noncontrolling members of Manning & Napier Group. While immaterial, the Company has not received any reimbursement for such services.

The Company manages the personal funds of certain of the Company's executive officers, including William Manning. Pursuant to the respective investment management agreements, in some instances the Company waives or reduces its regular advisory fees for these accounts and personal funds utilized to incubate products. The aggregate value of the fees waived for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 related to the Company's executive officers was ~~approximately~~less than $0.1 million.

Affiliate transactions - Manning & Napier Fund, Inc.

The Company has agreements to serve as the investment manager of Manning & Napier Fund, Inc., with which certain of its officers are affiliated. Under the terms of these agreements, which are generally reviewed and continued by the board of directors of Manning & Napier Fund, Inc. annually, the Company receives a fee based on an annual percentage of the average daily net assets of each series within the Manning & Napier Fund, Inc. The Company has contractually agreed to limit its fees and reimburse expenses to limit operating expenses incurred by certain of Manning & Napier Fund, Inc. series.

Note ~~15—~~14—Subsequent Events

Distributions and dividends

On ~~October 29, 2014,~~May 6, 2015, the Board of Directors approved a distribution from Manning & Napier Group to Manning & Napier and the noncontrolling interests of Manning & Napier Group. The amount of the distribution to the members of Manning & Napier Group is approximately ~~$46.3~~$31.3 million, of which approximately ~~$39.6~~$26.2 million is expected to be payable to the noncontrolling interests. Concurrently, the Board of Directors declared a ~~$0.24~~$0.16 per share dividend to the holders of Class A common stock. The dividend is payable on or about ~~February 2,~~August 3, 2015 to shareholders of record as of ~~January~~July 15, 2015.

Issuance of Class A common stock

On April 16, 2015, the Company granted approximately 1.1 million of Class A common stock under the Equity Plan, the majority of which is granted to certain of its employees that will vest over a six-year service period. As a result of the aforementioned transaction, the Company's economic ownership interest in Manning & Napier Group increased.

1816

Manning & Napier, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Revolving Credit Agreement

On April 23, 2015, the Company, Manning & Napier Group and MNA (collectively, the "Borrowers") entered into a $100.0 million revolving credit agreement (the "Credit Agreement”) with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as administrative agent and other lenders (collectively, the “Lenders”). The Credit Agreement has a four-year term, and amounts outstanding bear interest at either LIBOR or a base rate plus margin, at the option of the Borrowers. The Credit Agreement contains certain customary covenants that may impact the Borrowers' ability to incur additional debt, make investments, as well as require the Borrowers to maintain certain financial ratios.

Termination of Line of Credit

On April 23, 2015, the existing $10.0 million Note with M&T Bank was terminated in connection with entering into the Credit Agreement. There were no amounts outstanding under that facility.

Table of Contents

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

This report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which reflect our views with respect to, among other things, our operations and financial performance. Words like "believes," "expects," "may," "estimates," "will," "should," "could," "intends," "likely," "plans," or "anticipates" or the negative thereof or other variations thereon or comparable terminology, are used to identify forward-looking statements, although not all forward-looking statements contain these words. Although we believe that we are basing our expectations and beliefs on reasonable assumptions within the bounds of what we currently know about our business and operations, there can be no assurance that our actual results will not differ materially from what we expect or believe. Some of the factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from our expectations or beliefs are disclosed in the “Risk Factors” section, as well as other sections, of our Annual Report on Form 10-K which include, without limitation: changes in securities or financial markets or general economic conditions; a decline in the performance of our products; client sales and redemption activity; and changes of government policy or regulations. All forward-looking statements speak only as of the date on which they are made and we undertake no duty to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Overview

Business

We are an independent investment management firm that provides a broad range of investment solutions, as well as a variety of consultative services that complement our investment process. Founded in 1970, we offer equity, fixed income, and alternative strategies, as well as a range of blended asset portfolios, such as life cycle funds. We serve a diversified client base of high net worth individuals and institutions, including 401(k) plans, pension plans, Taft-Hartley plans, endowments and foundations. Our operations are based principally in the United States, with our headquarters located in Fairport, New York.

Our Products

We derive substantially all of our revenues from investment management fees earned from providing advisory services to separately managed accounts and mutual funds and collective investment trusts—including those offered by the Manning & Napier Fund, Inc. (the "Fund") and Exeter Trust Company.

Our separate accounts are primarily distributed through our Direct Channel, where our representatives form relationships with high net worth individuals, middle market institutions or large institutions that are working with a consultant. To a lesser extent, we also obtain a portion of our separate account distribution via third parties, either through our Intermediary Channel, where national brokerage firm representatives or independent financial advisors select our separate account strategies for their clients, or through our Platform/Sub-Advisory Channel, where unaffiliated registered investment advisors approve our strategies for their product platforms. Our separate account products are a primary driver of our blended asset portfolios for high net worth and middle market institutional clients and financial intermediaries. In contrast, larger institutions and unaffiliated registered investment advisor platforms are a driver of our separate account equity portfolios.

Our mutual funds and collective investment trusts are primarily distributed through financial intermediaries, including brokers, financial advisors, retirement plan advisors and platform relationships. We also obtain a portion of our mutual fund and collective investment trust distribution through our direct sales representatives, in particular within the defined contribution and institutional marketplace. Our mutual fund and collective investment trust products are an important driver of our blended asset class portfolios, in particular with 401(k) plan sponsors, advisors and recordkeepers that select our funds as default options for participants. In addition, financial intermediaries, mutual fund advisory programs and retail platforms are a driver of mutual fund equity portfolios.

Our assets under management (“AUM”) was $~~51.1~~45.6 billion as of ~~September 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015. The composition of our AUM by vehicle and portfolio is illustrated in the table below.


	September 30, 2014								March 31, 2015
AUM - by investment vehicle and portfolio	Blended Asset		Equity		Fixed Income		Total		Blended Asset		Equity		Fixed Income		Total
	(in millions)								(in millions)
Separately managed accounts	$	13,438.7	$	11,780.4	$	1,214.5	$	26,433.6	$	13,396.3	$	10,551.8	$	1,203.5	$	25,151.6
Mutual funds and collective investment trusts	11,898.5		12,753.0		38.3		24,689.8		12,017.1		8,405.6		46.7		20,469.4
Total	$	25,337.2	$	24,533.4	$	1,252.8	$	51,123.4	$	25,413.4	$	18,957.4	$	1,250.2	$	45,621.0

1918

Table of Contents

The composition of our separately managed accounts as of ~~September 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015, by channel and portfolio, is set forth in the table below.


	September 30, 2014												March 31, 2015
	Blended Asset			Equity			Fixed Income			Total			Blended Asset			Equity			Fixed Income			Total
	(dollars in millions)												(dollars in millions)
Separate account AUM
Direct Channel	$	9,604.7		$	8,505.7		$	1,039.7		$	19,150.1		$	9,591.0		$	7,722.9		$	1,037.1		$	18,351.0
Intermediary Channel	3,830.6			991.9			174.8			4,997.3			3,801.9			885.6			166.4			4,853.9
Platform/Sub-advisor Channel	3.4			2,282.8			—			2,286.2			3.4			1,943.3			—			1,946.7
Total	$	13,438.7		$	11,780.4		$	1,214.5		$	26,433.6		$	13,396.3		$	10,551.8		$	1,203.5		$	25,151.6
Percentage of separate account AUM
Direct Channel	36		%	32		%	4		%	72		%	38		%	31		%	4		%	73		%
Intermediary Channel	14		%	4		%	1		%	19		%	15		%	3		%	1		%	19		%
Platform/Sub-advisor Channel	—			9		%	—			9		%	—		%	8		%	—		%	8		%
Total	50		%	45		%	5		%	100		%	53		%	42		%	5		%	100		%
Percentage of portfolio by channel
Direct Channel	71		%	73		%	86		%	72		%	72		%	73		%	86		%	73		%
Intermediary Channel	29		%	8		%	14		%	19		%	28		%	8		%	14		%	19		%
Platform/Sub-advisor Channel	—			19		%	—		%	9		%	—		%	19		%	—		%	8		%
Total	100		%	100		%	100		%	100		%	100		%	100		%	100		%	100		%
Percentage of channel by portfolio
Direct Channel	50		%	44		%	6		%	100		%	52		%	42		%	6		%	100		%
Intermediary Channel	77		%	20		%	3		%	100		%	79		%	18		%	3		%	100		%
Platform/Sub-advisor Channel	—			100		%	—		%	100		%	—		%	100		%	—		%	100		%

Our separate accounts contributed 35% of our total gross client inflows for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 and represented ~~52%~~55% of our total AUM as of ~~September 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015.

Our separate account business has historically been driven primarily by our Direct Channel, where sales representatives form a relationship with high net worth investors, middle market institutions, and large institutional clients working in conjunction with a consultant. The Direct Channel contributed ~~56%~~72% of the total gross client inflows for our separate account business for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 and represented ~~72%~~73% of our total separate account AUM as of ~~September 30, 2014.~~March 31, 2015. We anticipate the Direct Channel to continue to be the largest driver of new separate account business going forward, given the Direct Channel’s high net worth and middle market institutional client-type focus.

During the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2014,~~March 31, 2015, blended asset and equity portfolios represented ~~47%~~74% and ~~36%~~20%, respectively, of the separate account gross client inflows from the Direct Channel, while fixed income portfolios accounted for ~~17%~~6%. As of ~~September 30, 2014,~~March 31, 2015, blended asset and equity portfolios represented ~~50%~~52% and ~~44%~~42%, respectively, of total Direct Channel separate account AUM, while our fixed income portfolios were 6%. We expect our focus on individuals and middle market institutions to continue to drive interest in our blended asset class portfolios, where we provide a comprehensive portfolio of stocks and bonds managed to a client’s specific investment objectives. Historically, relationships with larger institutions have been a driver of growth in separately managed account equity strategies. Going forward, we expect many of these larger institutions may seek exposure to non-U.S. equity strategies through commingled vehicles to limit related custody expenses rather than separately managed accounts, and our U.S.-based equity strategies may continue to be attractive to large institutions in a separate account format.

To a lesser extent, we also obtain separate account business from third parties, including financial advisors or unaffiliated registered investment advisor programs or platforms. During the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2014, 16%~~March 31, 2015, 14% of the total gross client inflows for separate accounts came from financial advisor representatives (Intermediary Channel), and an additional ~~28%~~14% came from registered investment advisor platforms (Platform/Sub-advisor Channel). The Intermediary and Platform/Sub-advisor Channels represented ~~28%~~27% of our total separate account AUM as of ~~September 30, 2014.~~March 31, 2015.

New separate account business through the Intermediary Channel flowed into both our blended asset and equity portfolios, driven by advisors’ needs to identify either a one-stop solution (blended asset portfolio) or to fill a mandate within a multi-strategy portfolio. During the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2014,~~March 31, 2015, blended asset and equity portfolios represented 84%

2019

Table of Contents

~~76%~~ and ~~22%~~15%, respectively, of the separate account gross client inflows from the Intermediary Channel, while fixed income portfolios represented 2%1%. As of ~~September 30, 2014~~, ~~77%~~March 31, 2015, 79% of our separate account AUM derived from financial advisors was allocated to blended asset portfolios, with ~~20%~~18% allocated to equity and 3% allocated to fixed income. We expect that equity and fixed income portfolios may see additional interest from financial advisors over time as more and more advisors structure a multi-strategy portfolio for their clients.

In contrast, gross client inflows through the Platform/Sub-advisor Channel are primarily directed to our equity strategies, where we are filling a specific mandate within the investment program or platform product. During the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2014, 98%~~March 31, 2015, 100% of our separate account gross client inflows from the Platform/Sub-advisory Channel were into equity ~~portfolios and 2% were into fixed income.~~portfolios.

Our annualized separate account retention rate across all channels ~~was~~is approximately ~~93%~~95% during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2014,~~March 31, 2015, representing the strong relationship focus that is inherent in our direct sales model, which is the primary driver of our separate account business.

During the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2014,~~March 31, 2015, market appreciation for our separate account AUM was ~~3.2%~~0.8%, including ~~4.6%~~0.3% in our blended assets, ~~and 1.9%~~1.3% in equity portfolios and 1.2% in our fixed income portfolios.

The composition of our mutual fund and collective investment trust AUM as of ~~September 30, 2014,~~March 31, 2015, by portfolio, is set forth in the table below.

September 30, 2014

Blended
Asset
Equity Fixed Income Total
(in millions)
Mutual fund and collective investment trust AUM $ 11,898.5
$ 12,753.0
$ 38.3
$ 24,689.8



	March 31, 2015
	Blended Asset		Equity		Fixed Income		Total
	(in millions)
Mutual fund and collective investment trust AUM	$	12,017.1	$	8,405.6	$	46.7	$	20,469.4

Our mutual funds and collective investment trusts contributed 65% of our total gross client inflows for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 and represented ~~48%~~45% of our total AUM as of ~~September 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015. As of ~~September 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015, our mutual fund and collective investment trust AUM consisted of ~~48%~~59% from blended asset portfolios and ~~52%~~41% from equity portfolios. During the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015, ~~55%~~67% and ~~44%~~31% of the gross client inflows were attributable to blended assets and equity portfolios, respectively. For the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015, market appreciation for our mutual fund and collective investment trust AUM was ~~flat,~~1.1%, including ~~4.4%~~0.9% in our blended assets ~~offset by a decrease of 3.7%~~and 1.3% in our equity portfolios, offset by market depreciation of 12.5% in our fixed income portfolios.

Our mutual fund and collective investment trust business is driven by financial intermediaries and to a lesser extent, our direct sales representatives. Intermediary distribution of our mutual fund and collective investment trust vehicles is achieved via financial advisors, brokers and retirement plan advisors. Through our Intermediary Channel, we are increasingly focused on our blended asset life cycle fund vehicles given our emphasis on advisors that work with retirement plans. Our blended asset portfolios are also used by advisors seeking a multi-asset class solution for their retail clients. In addition, our allocation to equity portfolios within the Intermediary Channel is anticipated to increase due to national brokerage firm representatives who wish to use our mutual funds as a component of a larger portfolio.

Through our Platform/Sub-advisor Channel, we have relationships with consultants and advisors at platforms. We derive equity portfolio assets in this channel through the selection of our funds within advisory programs where our mutual funds are used within a multi-strategy portfolio, or through placement on platforms’ approved lists of funds. To facilitate our relationships with intermediaries, we currently have more than ~~285~~290 dealer relationships. These relationships are important to the expansion of our retail business as well as our 401(k) life cycle and institutional business.

Our Direct Sales Representatives distribute our equity portfolios, in particular our non-U.S. portfolios, to large institutional clients with which we have direct relationships, and often the client’s consultant. Through the Direct Channel, we also form relationships with middle market and large market defined contribution plan sponsors seeking to use our life cycle mutual funds and collective investment trusts as default options on their investment menu. We expect this channel to be focused on distributing blended asset and equity portfolio funds, particularly as the breadth of our mutual fund and collective investment trust offerings expands.

Results of Operations

Below is a discussion of our consolidated results of operations for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 and ~~2013~~2014.

2120

Table of Contents

Key Components of Results of Operations

Overview

Changes to our operating results over time are largely driven by net client asset flows and changes to the market value of our AUM. ~~In addition, beginning in the quarter ended June 30, 2014, the~~The line item "market appreciation/(depreciation) and other" within our AUM tables throughout "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" includes investment gains/(losses) on assets under management and net flows from non-sales related activities including asset ~~acquisitions.~~acquisitions and net reinvested dividends.

An important factor influencing inflows and outflows of our AUM is the investment performance of our various investment approaches. Our variety of stock selection strategies, absolute pricing discipline and active asset allocation management approach generally results in specific absolute and relative return characteristics in different market environments. For example, during a fundamental-driven bull market when prices are rising alongside improving fundamentals, we are likely to experience positive absolute returns and competitive relative returns. However, in a more momentum-driven bull market, when prices become disconnected from underlying fundamentals, or narrow market environment where a small handful of stocks outperform the average stock, we are likely to experience positive absolute returns but lagging relative returns. Similarly, during a valuation-driven bear market, when markets experience a period of price correction following a momentum-driven bull market, we are likely to experience negative absolute returns but strong relative returns. However, in a momentum-driven bear market, which is typically characterized by broad price declines in a highly correlated market, we are likely to experience negative absolute returns and potentially lagging relative returns. Essentially, our approach is likely to do well when markets are driven by fundamentals, but lag when markets are driven primarily by momentum.

Other components impacting our operating results include:

asset-based fee rates and changes in those rates;

the composition of our AUM among various portfolios, vehicles and client types;

changes in our variable costs, including incentive compensation and distribution, servicing and custody expenses, which are affected by our investment performance, level of our AUM and revenue; and

fixed costs, including changes to base compensation, vendor-related costs and investment spending on new products.

2221

Table of Contents

Assets Under Management and Investment Performance

The following tables reflect the indicated components of our AUM for our investment vehicles for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 and ~~2013~~2014.


	Separately managed accounts			Mutual funds and collective investment trusts			Total			Separately managed accounts		Mutual funds and collective investment trusts		Total		Separately managed accounts			Mutual funds and collective investment trusts			Total			Separately managed accounts		Mutual funds and collective investment trusts		Total
				(in millions)															(in millions)
As of June 30, 2014	$	27,621.6		$	26,457.0		$	54,078.6		51	%	49	%	100	%
As of December 31, 2014																$	25,408.7		$	22,392.9		$	47,801.6		53	%	47	%	100	%
Gross client inflows	828.9			1,385.5			2,214.4									691.4			1,275.9			1,967.3
Gross client outflows	(979.5		)	(1,590.4		)	(2,569.9		)							(1,140.4		)	(3,434.7		)	(4,575.1		)
Market appreciation/(depreciation) & other	(1,037.4		)	(1,562.3		)	(2,599.7		)							191.9			235.3			427.2
As of September 30, 2014	$	26,433.6		$	24,689.8		$	51,123.4		52	%	48	%	100	%
As of March 31, 2015																$	25,151.6		$	20,469.4		$	45,621.0		55	%	45	%	100	%
Average AUM for period	$	27,164.9		$	25,811.1		$	52,976.0								$	25,430.0		$	21,675.7		$	47,105.7

As of June 30, 2013	$	24,791.5		$	21,526.2		$	46,317.7		54	%	46	%	100	%
Gross client inflows	484.9			1,414.8			1,899.7
Gross client outflows	(1,036.5		)	(1,271.8		)	(2,308.3		)
Market appreciation (depreciation)	1,583.7			1,622.1			3,205.8
As of September 30, 2013	$	25,823.6		$	23,291.3		$	49,114.9		53	%	47	%	100	%
Average AUM for period	$	25,362.0		$	22,634.3		$	47,996.3

	Separately managed accounts			Mutual funds and collective investment trusts			Total			Separately managed accounts		Mutual funds and collective investment trusts		Total
				(in millions)
As of December 31, 2013	$	26,835.0		$	23,991.2		$	50,826.2		53	%	47	%	100	%	$	26,835.0		$	23,991.2		$	50,826.2		53	%	47	%	100	%
Gross client inflows	2,480.2			4,680.9			7,161.1									716.3			1,689.7			2,406.0
Gross client outflows	(3,817.2		)	(3,973.4		)	(7,790.6		)							(1,076.0		)	(1,248.5		)	(2,324.5		)
Market appreciation/(depreciation) & other	935.6			(8.9		)	926.7
As of September 30, 2014	$	26,433.6		$	24,689.8		$	51,123.4		52	%	48	%	100	%
Market appreciation (depreciation)																742.2			541.5			1,283.7
As of March 31, 2014																$	27,217.5		$	24,973.9		$	52,191.4		52	%	48	%	100	%
Average AUM for period	$	27,107.5		$	25,236.1		$	52,343.6								$	26,900.4		$	24,187.7		$	51,088.1

As of December 31, 2012	$	24,683.6		$	20,525.3		$	45,208.9		55	%	45	%	100	%
Gross client inflows	1,939.8			4,564.0			6,503.8
Gross client outflows	(3,999.5		)	(4,369.5		)	(8,369.0		)
Market appreciation (depreciation)	3,199.7			2,571.5			5,771.2
As of September 30, 2013	$	25,823.6		$	23,291.3		$	49,114.9		53	%	47	%	100	%
Average AUM for period	$	25,684.1		$	22,014.3		$	47,698.4

~~Table of Contents~~

The following tables reflect the indicated components of our AUM for our portfolios for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 and ~~2013~~2014.


	Blended Asset			Equity			Fixed Income			Total			Blended Asset		Equity		Fixed Income		Total		Blended Asset			Equity			Fixed Income			Total			Blended Asset		Equity		Fixed Income		Total
				(in millions)																				(in millions)
As of June 30, 2014	$	25,891.6		$	26,968.0		$	1,219.0		$	54,078.6		48	%	50	%	2	%	100	%
As of December 31, 2014																					$	25,279.0		$	21,284.1		$	1,238.5		$	47,801.6		53	%	44	%	3	%	100	%
Gross client inflows	1,208.0			858.3			148.1			2,214.4											1,308.6			606.1			52.6			1,967.3
Gross client outflows	(1,151.5		)	(1,281.5		)	(136.9		)	(2,569.9		)									(1,312.2		)	(3,213.2		)	(49.7		)	(4,575.1		)
Market appreciation/(depreciation) & other	(610.9		)	(2,011.4		)	22.6			(2,599.7		)									138.0			280.4			8.8			427.2
As of September 30, 2014	$	25,337.2		$	24,533.4		$	1,252.8		$	51,123.4		50	%	48	%	2	%	100	%
As of March 31, 2015																					$	25,413.4		$	18,957.4		$	1,250.2		$	45,621.0		55	%	42	%	3	%	100	%
Average AUM for period	$	25,697.4		$	26,039.4		$	1,239.2		$	52,976.0										$	25,374.6		$	20,481.5		$	1,249.6		$	47,105.7

As of June 30, 2013	$	21,723.4		$	23,405.4		$	1,188.9		$	46,317.7		47	%	50	%	3	%	100	%
Gross client inflows	1,093.9			791.0			14.8			1,899.7
Gross client outflows	(1,026.4		)	(1,202.2		)	(79.7		)	(2,308.3		)
Market appreciation (depreciation)	1,053.2			2,142.5			10.1			3,205.8
As of September 30, 2013	$	22,844.1		$	25,136.7		$	1,134.1		$	49,114.9		47	%	51	%	2	%	100	%
Average AUM for period	$	22,374.6		$	24,466.3		$	1,155.4		$	47,996.3

	Blended Asset			Equity			Fixed Income			Total			Blended Asset		Equity		Fixed Income		Total
				(in millions)
As of December 31, 2013	$	23,710.2		$	25,977.0		$	1,139.0		$	50,826.2		47	%	51	%	2	%	100	%	$	23,710.2		$	25,977.0		$	1,139.0		$	50,826.2		47	%	51	%	2	%	100	%
Gross client inflows	3,535.5			3,352.3			273.3			7,161.1											1,137.5			1,201.7			66.8			2,406.0
Gross client outflows	(2,971.5		)	(4,543.4		)	(275.7		)	(7,790.6		)									(942.9		)	(1,299.1		)	(82.5		)	(2,324.5		)
Market appreciation/(depreciation) & other	1,063.0			(252.5		)	116.2			926.7
As of September 30, 2014	$	25,337.2		$	24,533.4		$	1,252.8		$	51,123.4		50	%	48	%	2	%	100	%
Market appreciation (depreciation)																					608.5			660.3			14.9			1,283.7
As of March 31, 2014																					$	24,513.3		$	26,539.9		$	1,138.2		$	52,191.4		47	%	51	%	2	%	100	%
Average AUM for period	$	24,924.9		$	26,229.3		$	1,189.4		$	52,343.6										$	23,987.8		$	25,967.9		$	1,132.4		$	51,088.1

As of December 31, 2012	$	20,470.7		$	23,472.5		$	1,265.7		$	45,208.9		45	%	52	%	3	%	100	%
Gross client inflows	3,383.3			3,017.3			103.2			6,503.8
Gross client outflows	(3,084.1		)	(5,064.8		)	(220.1		)	(8,369.0		)
Market appreciation (depreciation)	2,074.2			3,711.7			(14.7		)	5,771.2
As of September 30, 2013	$	22,844.1		$	25,136.7		$	1,134.1		$	49,114.9		47	%	51	%	2	%	100	%
Average AUM for period	$	21,921.2		$	24,566.9		$	1,210.3		$	47,698.4

Table of Contents

The following table summarizes the annualized returns for our key investment strategies and the relative performance of the industry benchmark over the periods indicated. Since inception these strategies have earned attractive returns on both an absolute and relative basis. These strategies are used across separate account, mutual fund and collective investment trust vehicles, and approximately 81% of our AUM as of March 31, 2015.



Key Strategies	AUM as of March 31, 2015 (in millions)		Inception Date	Annualized Returns as of March 31, 2015 (3)
Key Strategies	AUM as of March 31, 2015 (in millions)		Inception Date	Inception	Market Cycle (1)	Ten Year	Five Year	Three Year	One Year
Long-Term Growth 30%-80% Equity Exposure	$	11,475.1	1/1/1973	9.9%	6.8%	6.9%	8.7%	9.2%	3.5%
Blended Benchmark: 55% S&P 500 Total Return / 45% Barclays Government/Credit Bond				9.4%	5.2%	7.0%	10.3%	10.4%	9.7%
Growth with Reduced Volatility 20%-60% Equity Exposure	$	5,278.9	1/1/1973	9.1%	6.3%	6.2%	7.2%	7.3%	2.9%
Blended Benchmark: 40% S&P 500 Total Return / 60% Barclays Government/Credit Bond				9.0%	1.4%	6.5%	8.8%	8.4%	8.7%
Aggregate Fixed Income	$	463.9	1/1/1984	7.7%	5.4%	4.9%	4.3%	2.6%	3.6%
Benchmark: Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond				7.7%	5.7%	4.9%	4.4%	3.1%	5.7%
Equity-Oriented	$	3,326.9	1/1/1993	10.4%	7.1%	7.3%	9.7%	11.9%	4.1%
Blended Benchmark: 65% Russell 3000® / 20% ACWIxUS / 15% Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond				8.7%	4.8%	7.5%	11.3%	12.4%	8.7%
Core Equity (Unrestricted) 90%-100% Equity Exposure	$	1,915.5	1/1/1995	11.6%	7.8%	8.3%	11.2%	14.2%	4.8%
Blended Benchmark: 80% Russell 3000® / 20% ACWIxUS				9.1%	4.5%	7.9%	12.7%	14.4%	9.6%
Core Non-U.S. Equity	$	11,360.6	10/1/1996	8.0%	6.0%	5.6%	3.4%	4.3%	(9.4)%
Benchmark: ACWIxUS Index				5.3%	3.5%	5.5%	4.8%	6.4%	(1.0)%
Core U.S. Equity	$	3,194.5	7/1/2000	7.4%	N/A (2)	8.4%	11.3%	14.6%	6.3%
Benchmark: Russell 3000® Index				5.0%	4.6%	8.4%	14.7%	16.4%	12.4%

__________________________


(1)	The Market Cycle performance numbers are calculated from April 1, 2000 to March 31, 2015.


(2)	Market Cycle performance not available given the product's July 1, 2000 inception date.


(3)	Key investment strategy returns are presented net of fees. Benchmark returns do not reflect any fees or expenses.

Revenue

Our revenues primarily consist of investment management fees earned from managing our clients’ AUM. We earn our investment management fees as a percentage of our clients’ AUM either as of a specified date or on a daily basis. Our investment management fees can fluctuate based on the average fee rate for our investment management products, which are affected by the composition of our AUM among various portfolios and investment vehicles. ~~We currently do not have revenues from performance fee based products.~~

Manning & Napier Advisors, LLC ("MNA"), a subsidiary of Manning & Napier Group, serves as the investment advisor to the Fund and Exeter Trust Company. The Fund is a family of open-end mutual funds that offer no-load share classes designed to meet the needs of a range of institutional and other investors. Exeter Trust Company is an affiliated New Hampshire-chartered trust company that sponsors a family of collective investment trusts for qualified retirement plans,

~~Table of Contents~~

including 401(k) plans. These mutual funds and collective investment trusts comprised $~~24.7~~20.5 billion, or ~~48%~~45%, of our AUM as of ~~September 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015, and investment management fees from these mutual funds and collective investment trusts were $~~56.5~~45.2 million, or ~~54%~~50% of our revenues for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015. MNA also serves as the investment advisor to all of our separately managed accounts, managing $~~26.4~~25.2 billion, or ~~52%~~55%, of our AUM as of ~~September 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015, including assets managed as a sub-advisor to pooled investment vehicles and assets in client accounts invested in the Fund.

Operating Expenses

Our largest operating expenses are employee compensation and distribution, servicing and custody expenses, discussed further below, with a significant portion of these expenses varying in a direct relationship to our absolute and relative investment management performance, as well as AUM and revenues. We review our operating expenses in relation to the investment market environment and changes in our revenues. However, we are generally willing to make expenditures as

Table of Contents

necessary even when faced with declining rates of growth in revenues in order to support our investment products, our client service levels, strategic initiatives and our long-term value.

Compensation and related costs. Employee compensation and related costs represent our largest expense, including employee salaries and benefits, incentive compensation to investment and sales professionals ~~reorganization-related share-based compensation~~ and equity-based compensation issued under our equity compensation plan. These costs are affected by changes in the employee headcount, the mix of existing job descriptions, competitive factors, the addition of new skill sets, variations in the level of our AUM and revenues, changes in our stock price reflected in share-based compensation and/or the number of awards issued. In addition, incentive compensation for our research team considers the cumulative impact of both absolute and relative investment performance over the trailing one-, two- and three-year time periods, with more weight placed on the recent periods. As such, incentive compensation paid to our research team will vary based on absolute and relative investment performance.

Distribution, servicing and custody expenses. Distribution, servicing and custody expense represent amounts paid to various platforms that distribute our mutual ~~fund~~funds and collective ~~investment~~ trust ~~products~~funds, as well as costs for custodial services and 12b-1 ~~distribution and servicing fees.~~distribution. These expenses generally increase or decrease in line with changes in our mutual fund and collective investment trust AUM ~~and business mix.~~or services performed by these intermediaries.

Other operating expenses. Other operating expenses include fund fee waiver and/or expense reimbursement, professional fees, including accounting and legal fees, occupancy and facility costs, travel and entertainment expenses, insurance, market data service expenses and all other miscellaneous costs associated with managing the day-to-day operations of our business.

Non-Operating Income (Loss)

Non-operating income (loss) includes interest expense, interest and dividend income, changes in liability under the tax receivable agreement and gains (losses) related to investment securities sales and changes in values of those investment securities designated as trading. We expect the interest and investment components of non-operating income (loss) to fluctuate based on market conditions, the performance of our investments and the overall amount of our investments held by the Company to provide initial cash seeding for product development purposes.

Provision for Income Taxes

The Company is comprised of entities that have elected to be treated as either a limited liability company ("LLC") or a "C-Corporation". As such, the entities functioning as LLC's are not liable for or able to benefit from U.S. federal or most state and local income taxes on their earnings, and their earnings (losses) will be included in the personal income tax returns of each entity's unit holders. The entities functioning as C-Corporations are liable for or able to benefit from U.S. federal and state and local income taxes on their earnings and losses, respectively.

Noncontrolling Interests

Manning & Napier, Inc. holds an approximately 15.6% economic interest in Manning & Napier Group as of March 31, 2015 but, as managing member, controls all of the business and affairs of Manning & Napier Group. As a result, the Company consolidates the financial results of Manning & Napier Group and records a noncontrolling interest in our consolidated financial statements. Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests on the consolidated statements of operations represents the portion of earnings or loss attributable to the economic interest in Manning & Napier Group held by the noncontrolling interests.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

There have been no significant changes in our critical accounting policies and estimates from those that were disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2013~~2014.

This management’s discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2013~~2014 together with the consolidated financial statements and related notes and the other financial information that appear elsewhere in this report.

Revenue Recognition

Because the majority of our revenues are earned based on AUM that has been determined using fair value methods and since market appreciation/depreciation has a significant impact on our revenue, we have presented our AUM using the U.S. GAAP ("GAAP")) framework for measuring fair value. A fair value hierarchy is provided that gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). The following three-tier fair value hierarchy prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value:

Level 1—observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets for identical securities;

2524

Table of Contents

Level 2—other significant observable inputs (including but not limited to quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment rates, credit risk, etc.); and

Level 3—significant unobservable inputs (including the Company’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments).

The table below summarizes the approximate amount of AUM for the periods indicated for which fair value is measured based on Level 1, Level 2 and Level 3.

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
(in millions)
September 30, 2014 $ 30,725
$ 20,398
$ —
$ 51,123
December 31, 2013 $ 30,049
$ 20,769
$ 8
$ 50,826



	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
	(in millions)
March 31, 2015	$	27,047	$	18,574	$	—	$	45,621
December 31, 2014	$	28,641	$	19,161	$	—	$	47,802

As substantially all our AUM is valued by independent pricing services based upon observable market prices or inputs, we believe market risk is the most significant risk underlying valuation of our AUM, as discussed in this Form 10-Q under “Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk” and in “Part II. Item 1A. Risk Factors” of our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2013.~~2014.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

~~In May 2014,~~See Note 2, "Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - Recent accounting pronouncements" to the Consolidated Financial ~~Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU")2014-09,~~ ~~Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), which supersedes existing accounting standards~~Statements included in Item 1 of Part I of this Form 10-Q for revenue recognition and creates a single framework. The new guidance will be effective on January 1, 2017 and requires either a retrospective or a modified retrospective approach to adoption. Early application is prohibited. The Company is currently evaluating its transition method and the potential impact on its consolidated financial statements.additional information.

Three Months Ended ~~September 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 Compared to Three Months Ended ~~September 30, 2013~~March 31, 2014

Assets Under Management

The following table reflects changes in our AUM for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 and ~~2013~~2014:


	Three months ended September 30,						Period-to-Period					Three months ended March 31,						Period-to-Period
	2014			2013			$			%		2015			2014			$			%
	(in millions)											(in millions)
Separately managed accounts
Beginning assets under management	$	27,621.6		$	24,791.5		$	2,830.1		11	%	$	25,408.7		$	26,835.0		$	(1,426.3	)	(5	)%
Gross client inflows	828.9			484.9			344.0			71	%	691.4			716.3			(24.9		)	(3	)%
Gross client outflows	(979.5		)	(1,036.5		)	57.0			(5	)%	(1,140.4		)	(1,076.0		)	(64.4		)	6	%
Market appreciation (depreciation) & other	(1,037.4		)	1,583.7			(2,621.1		)	(166	)%	191.9			742.2			(550.3		)	(74	)%
Ending assets under management	$	26,433.6		$	25,823.6		$	610.0		2	%	$	25,151.6		$	27,217.5		$	(2,065.9	)	(8	)%
Mutual funds and collective investment trusts
Beginning assets under management	$	26,457.0		$	21,526.2		$	4,930.8		23	%	$	22,392.9		$	23,991.2		$	(1,598.3	)	(7	)%
Gross client inflows	1,385.5			1,414.8			(29.3		)	(2	)%	1,275.9			1,689.7			(413.8		)	(24	)%
Gross client outflows	(1,590.4		)	(1,271.8		)	(318.6		)	25	%	(3,434.7		)	(1,248.5		)	(2,186.2		)	175	%
Market appreciation (depreciation) & other	(1,562.3		)	1,622.1			(3,184.4		)	(196	)%	235.3			541.5			(306.2		)	(57	)%
Ending assets under management	$	24,689.8		$	23,291.3		$	1,398.5		6	%	$	20,469.4		$	24,973.9		$	(4,504.5	)	(18	)%
Total assets under management
Beginning assets under management	$	54,078.6		$	46,317.7		$	7,760.9		17	%	$	47,801.6		$	50,826.2		$	(3,024.6	)	(6	)%
Gross client inflows	2,214.4			1,899.7			314.7			17	%	1,967.3			2,406.0			(438.7		)	(18	)%
Gross client outflows	(2,569.9		)	(2,308.3		)	(261.6		)	11	%	(4,575.1		)	(2,324.5		)	(2,250.6		)	97	%
Market appreciation (depreciation) & other	(2,599.7		)	3,205.8			(5,805.5		)	(181	)%	427.2			1,283.7			(856.5		)	(67	)%
Ending assets under management	$	51,123.4		$	49,114.9		$	2,008.5		4	%	$	45,621.0		$	52,191.4		$	(6,570.4	)	(13	)%

_______________________

Our total AUM decreased by $6.6 billion, or 13%, to $45.6 billion as of March 31, 2015 from $52.2 billion as of March 31, 2014. The $6.6 billion decrease in AUM from March 31, 2014 to March 31, 2015 was attributable to net client

2625

Table of Contents

~~Our total AUM increased by~~ ~~$2.0 billion, or~~ 4%~~, to~~ ~~$51.1 billion~~ ~~as of~~ ~~September 30, 2014~~ ~~from~~ ~~$49.1 billion~~ ~~as of~~ ~~September 30, 2013. The $2.0 billion increase in AUM from September 30, 2013 to September 30, 2014 was attributable to market appreciation of $3.3 billion offset by net client~~ outflows of ~~$1.3~~$6.0 billion and market depreciation of $0.6 billion. The net client outflows of ~~$1.3~~$6.0 billion consisted of ~~$1.6~~$2.4 billion of net outflows for separate accounts ~~partially offset by~~and $3.6 billion for mutual funds and collective investment ~~trusts net inflows of $0.3 billion.~~trusts.

For the three months ended ~~September 30, 2014~~,March 31, 2015, our AUM decreased by ~~$3.0~~$2.2 billion as compared to an increase of ~~$2.8~~$1.4 billion for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2013~~.March 31, 2014. For the three months ended ~~September 30, 2014~~,March 31, 2015, gross client inflows ~~increased~~decreased by ~~$0.3~~$0.4 billion as compared to the three months ended ~~September 30, 2013~~,March 31, 2014, while gross client outflows increased by ~~$0.3~~$2.3 billion for the same period. Additionally, we experienced market ~~depreciation~~appreciation and other AUM changes of ~~$2.6~~$0.4 billion for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 compared to ~~market appreciation of~~ ~~$3.2~~$1.3 billion for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2013~~.March 31, 2014.

The total AUM decrease of ~~$3.0~~$2.2 billion, or 5%4.6%, to ~~$51.1~~$45.6 billion at ~~September 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 from ~~$54.1~~$47.8 billion at ~~June 30,~~December 31, 2014 was attributable ~~to market depreciation~~net client cash outflows of $2.6 billion ~~and net client cash outflows~~offset by market appreciation of $0.4 billion. Our net client flows were comprised of separate accounts net client outflows of approximately ~~$0.2~~$0.4 billion and net outflows from our mutual funds and collective investment trusts of approximately ~~$0.2~~$2.2 billion.

With regard to our separate accounts, gross client inflows of ~~$0.8~~$0.7 billion were offset by gross client outflows of ~~$1.0~~$1.1 billion. ~~The~~For the three months ended March 31, 2015, blended asset ~~and~~net flows increased slightly while equity portfolios ~~each~~ experienced ~~$0.1~~$0.5 billion in net client ~~outflows, with equity flows being primarily driven by re-balancing or cancellations within our Non-U.S. Equity strategy.~~outflows. Our annualized separate account retention rate ~~was~~is 95% for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2014, which is up from 85% for the three months ended June 30, 2014 and 94%~~March 31, 2015, compared to 92% for the full year ~~2013. The increase~~2014. In addition, our separate account clients redeemed assets at a rate of 13% in the ~~retention~~quarter, which is in line with the 12% redemption rate ~~compared to~~from existing accounts that we have observed over the prior quarter is driven by a significant cancellation incurred during the three months ended June 30, 2014 as a result of an institutional relationship in a Non-U.S. Equity mandate that restructured into a passive management portfolio.trailing 12 months.

Net client outflows of ~~$0.2~~$2.2 billion from our mutual fund and collective investment trusts included gross client inflows of ~~$1.4~~$1.3 billion offset by gross client outflows of ~~$1.6~~$3.4 billion. Approximately ~~$0.4~~$1.7 billion of net client outflows occurred in our World Opportunities Series, ~~offset by net client inflows of $0.1~~$0.2 billion in our ~~Life Cycle mutual fund~~Overseas Series and ~~collective trust products, which includes both risk based and target date strategies, and $0.1~~$0.2 billion ~~of net client inflows~~ in our ~~Overseas~~Equity Series. The outflows ~~in the World Opportunities Series~~ were largely attributable to certain platform relationships reducing their allocation to core international equities and relative ~~underperformance, while Defined Contribution plans and Institutional Direct Channel relationships supported net inflows~~underperformance.

Net client outflows offset by market appreciation during the ~~quarter.~~

~~Market depreciation during the~~ three months ended ~~September 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 constituted a ~~4.8%~~4.6% rate of decrease in our total AUM. The investment ~~loss~~gain was ~~3.8%~~0.8% in separately managed accounts and ~~was~~ ~~5.9%~~1.1% in mutual funds and collective investment trusts.

The rate of change in AUM during the three months ended ~~September 30, 2014~~ ~~were~~March 31, 2015 was most significant in our equity portfolio with a decrease of 9% $2.3 billion or 11%. Our blended asset portfolio ~~decreased 2% while~~and our fixed income portfolio each increased 3%1% . The rates of change in AUM ~~were~~was most significant in our ~~blended asset and fixed income~~equity portfolios from ~~September 30, 2013~~March 31, 2014 to ~~September 30, 2014, as these portfolios each experienced increases~~March 31, 2015, with a decrease of ~~11%~~ ~~and 10%~~$7.6 billion or 29%, ~~respectively,~~ over this period, while our ~~equity~~blended asset portfolio ~~decreased by 2%. Our~~and fixed income ~~portfolio~~portfolios increased ~~primarily as a result of the Company's acquisition of 2100 Xenon Group, LLC, which includes a global managed futures strategy, a long/short global fixed income futures product,~~by 4% and ~~a futures alpha product.~~10% respectively.

As of ~~September 30, 2014~~,March 31, 2015, the composition of our AUM was ~~48%~~45% in mutual funds and collective investment trusts and ~~52%~~55% in separate accounts, compared to ~~47%~~48% in mutual funds and collective investment trusts and ~~53%~~52% in separate accounts at ~~September 30, 2013~~.March 31, 2014. The composition of our AUM across portfolios at ~~September 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 was ~~50%~~55% in blended assets, ~~48%~~42% in equity, and 2%3% in fixed income, compared to 47% in blended assets, 51% in equity, and 2% in fixed income at ~~September 30, 2013~~.March 31, 2014.

2726

Table of Contents

The following table sets forth our results of operations and related data for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 and ~~2013~~2014:


	Three months ended September 30,					Period-to-Period					Three months ended March 31,				Period-to-Period
	2014			2013		$			%		2015		2014		$			%
	(in thousands, except share data)										(in thousands, except share data)
Revenues
Investment management services revenue	$	104,795		$	94,647	$	10,148		11	%	$	90,426	$	98,470	$	(8,044	)	(8	)%
Expenses
Compensation and related costs	51,499			44,935		6,564			15	%	26,818		51,810		(24,992		)	(48	)%
Distribution, servicing and custody expenses	19,921			17,459		2,462			14	%	16,832		18,440		(1,608		)	(9	)%
Other operating costs	9,365			7,706		1,659			22	%	8,942		7,937		1,005			13	%
Total operating expenses	80,785			70,100		10,685			15	%	52,592		78,187		(25,595		)	(33	)%
Operating income	24,010			24,547		(537		)	(2	)%	37,834		20,283		17,551			87	%
Non-operating income (loss)
Non-operating income (loss), net	(1,214		)	468		(1,682		)	*		756		2,437		(1,681		)	(69	)%
Income before provision for income taxes	22,796			25,015		(2,219		)	(9	)%	38,590		22,720		15,870			70	%
Provision for income taxes	2,976			2,222		754			34	%	2,479		5,076		(2,597		)	(51	)%
Net income attributable to controlling and noncontrolling interests	19,820			22,793		(2,973		)	(13	)%	36,111		17,644		18,467			105	%
Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interests	19,392			21,479		(2,087		)	(10	)%	32,802		17,563		15,239			87	%
Net income attributable to Manning & Napier, Inc.	$	428		$	1,314	$	(886	)	(67	)%	$	3,309	$	81	$	3,228		*
Per Share Data
Net income per share available to Class A common stock
Basic	$	0.03		$	0.10						$	0.24	$	0.01
Diluted	$	0.03		$	0.10						$	0.24	$	0.01
Weighted average shares of Class A common stock outstanding
Basic	13,705,134			13,634,246							13,713,540		13,634,401
Diluted	13,930,020			13,690,641							13,914,908		13,751,690
Cash dividends declared per share of Class A common stock	$	0.16		$	0.16						$	0.16	$	0.16

Other financial and operating data
Economic income ⁽¹⁾	$	43,632		$	43,252	$	380		1	%	$	38,590	$	44,661	$	(6,071	)	(14	)%
Economic net income ⁽¹⁾	$	26,943		$	26,707	$	236		1	%	$	24,312	$	27,578	$	(3,266	)	(12	)%
Economic net income per adjusted share ⁽¹⁾	$	0.31		$	0.30						$	0.28	$	0.31
Weighted average adjusted Class A common stock outstanding ⁽¹⁾	88,147,234			89,912,186							88,078,806		89,889,021

_______________________

(1)

For the period ending March 31, 2015, economic income, a non-GAAP measure, is equivalent to income before provision for income taxes. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Supplemental Non-GAAP Financial Information” for Manning & Napier’s reasons for including these non-GAAP measures in this report in addition to a reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measures to GAAP measures for the periods indicated.


(*)	Percentage change not meaningful

Revenues

Our investment management services revenue ~~increased~~decreased by ~~$10.1~~$8.0 million, or ~~11%~~8%, to ~~$104.8~~$90.4 million for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 from ~~$94.6~~$98.5 million for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2013.~~March 31, 2014. This ~~increase~~decrease is driven primarily by a ~~$5.0~~$4.0 billion, or ~~10%~~8%, ~~increase~~decrease in our average AUM to ~~$53.0~~$47.1 billion for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 from ~~$48.0~~$51.1 billion for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2013.~~March 31, 2014.

2827

Table of Contents

Our average separately managed account fee ~~remained consistent at 62~~increased slightly to 63 basis points for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2014 and~~March 31, 2015 compared to 61 basis points for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2013.~~March 31, 2014. For the three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2015 and 2014, ~~and 2013,~~ separately managed account standard fees ranged from 15 basis points to 125 basis points depending on investment objective and account size. As of ~~September 30, 2014,~~March 31, 2015, the concentration of assets in our separately managed accounts was ~~50%~~53% blended assets, ~~45%~~42% equity and 5% fixed income, compared to ~~48%~~49% blended assets, ~~48%~~47% equity and 4% fixed income as of ~~September 30, 2013.~~March 31, 2014.

Our average fee on mutual fund and collective investment trust products decreased ~~slightly~~ to 8785 basis points for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 compared to the three months ended ~~September 30, 2013~~March 31, 2014 of 88 basis points. The management fees earned on our mutual fund and collective investment trust management fees ranged from 24 basis points to 100 basis points, depending on investment strategy, for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 and ~~2013.~~2014. As of ~~September 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 the concentration of assets in our mutual fund and collective investment trusts was ~~48%~~59% blended assets and ~~52%~~41% equity, compared to 45% blended assets and 55% equity of ~~September 30, 2013.~~March 31, 2014.

Operating Expenses

Our operating expenses ~~increased~~decreased by ~~$10.7~~$25.6 million, or ~~15%~~33%, to ~~$80.8~~$52.6 million for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 from ~~$70.1~~$78.2 million for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2013.~~March 31, 2014.

Compensation and related costs ~~increased~~decreased by ~~$6.6~~$25.0 million, or ~~15%~~48%, to ~~$51.5~~$26.8 million for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 from ~~$44.9~~$51.8 million for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2013.~~March 31, 2014. This ~~increase~~change was driven primarily by the completion of the vesting of pre-IPO ownership interests in 2014 and as such, we no longer record non-cash reorganization-related share based compensation. Included within compensation and related costs for the three months ended March 31, 2014 was approximately $21.9 million of non-cash reorganization-related share based compensation. The remaining decrease of $3.1 million was due to ~~higher non-cash share based compensation charges and higher~~lower incentive compensation costs for our analyst team resulting from ~~the cumulative impact of strong relative and absolute~~ investment performance offor the ~~Company over the trailing one, two and three-year time~~respective periods. Included within compensation and related costs ~~is approximately $20.8~~was $0.6 million and ~~$18.2 million of non-cash reorganization-related share based compensation charges and~~ $0.9 ~~million and $0.5~~ million of equity-based compensation charges under our 2011 long-term incentive plan for the three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2015 and 2014, ~~and 2013,~~ respectively. ~~The~~We would expect equity-based compensation charges to increase in ~~share based compensation charges under our 2011 long-term incentive plan is due to the recognition over the vesting period~~future periods as a result of the ~~equity~~approximately 1.1 million of awards issued ~~in fiscal 2014 and 2013 in the three months ended September 30, 2014.~~on April 16, 2015. When considered as a percentage of revenue, compensation and related costs for the three months ended March 31, 2015 was 30% compared to 30% for the three months ended March 31, 2014 when excluding non-cash reorganization-related share-based compensation ~~charges, for the three months ended September 30, 2014 was 29% compared to 28% for the three months ended September 30, 2013.~~charges.

Distribution, servicing and custody expenses ~~increased~~decreased by ~~$2.5~~$1.6 million, or ~~14%~~9%, to ~~$19.9~~$16.8 million for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 from ~~$17.5~~$18.4 million for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2013.~~March 31, 2014. The ~~increase~~decrease was generally driven by a ~~14% increase~~10% decrease in mutual funds and collective investment trusts average AUM for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 compared to the three months ended ~~September 30, 2013.~~March 31, 2014. As a percentage of mutual fund and collective investment trust revenue, distribution, servicing and custody expense was 37% for the three months ended March 31, 2015, compared to 35% for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2014, consistent with 35% for the three months ended September 30, 2013.~~March 31, 2014.

Other operating costs increased by ~~$1.7~~$1.0 million, or ~~22%~~13%, to ~~$9.4~~$8.9 million for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 from ~~$7.7~~$7.9 million for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2013.~~March 31, 2014. As a percentage of revenue, other operating costs for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 was 9%10% compared to 8% for ~~2013.~~2014.

Non-Operating Income (Loss)

Non-operating income ~~(loss) decreased by~~ ~~$1.7 million, to a net loss of~~ ~~$1.2 million~~ ~~for the~~ ~~three months ended September 30, 2014~~ ~~from income of~~ ~~$0.5 million~~ ~~for the~~ ~~three months ended September 30, 2013~~. The Company has increased the amount of investments held by the Company to provide initial cash seeding for product development purposes as compared to the amount held during the three months ended September 30, 2013 and those investments experienced losses during the quarter ended September 30, 2014.

~~Provision for Income Taxes~~

~~The Company’s tax provision increased by $0.8 million, or 34%, to $3.0 million~~ for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2014 from $2.2~~March 31, 2015 was $0.8 million, compared to $2.4 million of income for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2013. The increase is primarily driven by increases in expected taxable earnings as compared to the prior year.~~

~~Table of Contents~~

~~Nine Months EndedSeptember 30,~~March 31, 2014 ~~Compared to~~ ~~Nine Months EndedSeptember 30, 2013~~

~~Assets Under Management~~

~~The following table reflects changes in our AUM for the~~ ~~nine months ended September 30, 2014~~ ~~and~~ ~~2013~~:

Nine months ended September 30, Period-to-Period
2014 2013 $ %
(in millions)
Separately managed accounts
Beginning assets under management $ 26,835.0
$ 24,683.6
$ 2,151.4
9 %
Gross client inflows 2,480.2
1,939.8
540.4
28 %
Gross client outflows (3,817.2 ) (3,999.5 ) 182.3
(5 )%
Market appreciation (depreciation) & other 935.6
3,199.7
(2,264.1 ) (71 )%
Ending assets under management $ 26,433.6
$ 25,823.6
$ 610.0
2 %
Mutual funds and collective investment trusts
Beginning assets under management $ 23,991.2
$ 20,525.3
$ 3,465.9
17 %
Gross client inflows 4,680.9
4,564.0
116.9
3 %
Gross client outflows (3,973.4 ) (4,369.5 ) 396.1
(9 )%
Market appreciation (depreciation) & other (8.9 ) 2,571.5
(2,580.4 ) (100 )%
Ending assets under management $ 24,689.8
$ 23,291.3
$ 1,398.5
6 %
Total assets under management
Beginning assets under management $ 50,826.2
$ 45,208.9
$ 5,617.3
12 %
Gross client inflows 7,161.1
6,503.8
657.3
10 %
Gross client outflows (7,790.6 ) (8,369.0 ) 578.4
(7 )%
Market appreciation (depreciation) & other 926.7
5,771.2
(4,844.5 ) (84 )%
Ending assets under management $ 51,123.4
$ 49,114.9
$ 2,008.5
4 %

~~Our total AUM increased by $2.0 billion, or 4%, to~~ ~~$51.1 billion~~ ~~as of~~ ~~September 30, 2014~~ ~~from~~ ~~$49.1 billion~~ ~~as of~~ ~~September 30, 2013~~. ~~For the~~ ~~nine months ended September 30, 2014, gross client inflows increased by~~ ~~$0.7 billion~~ ~~as compared to the~~ ~~nine months ended September 30, 2013, while gross client outflows decreased by~~ ~~$0.6 billion~~ ~~for the same periods. Additionally, we experienced market appreciation and other AUM increases of~~ ~~$0.9 billion~~ ~~for the~~ ~~nine months ended September 30, 2014~~ ~~compared to~~ ~~$5.8 billion~~ ~~for the~~ ~~nine months ended September 30, 2013~~.

~~The total AUM increase of $0.3 billion, or 1%, to~~ ~~$51.1 billion~~ at ~~September 30, 2014~~ ~~from~~ ~~$50.8 billion~~ at ~~December 31, 2013~~ ~~was a result of market appreciation and other changes of~~ ~~$0.9 billion, partially offset by net client outflows of~~ ~~$0.6 billion~~. For the nine months ended September 30, 2014, net client inflows into our mutual funds and collective investment trusts were $0.7 billion, and were offset by approximately $1.3 billion of net client outflows from our separate accounts.

Our separate account products gathered $2.5 billion of gross client inflows during the nine months ended September 30, 2014, which was offset by approximately $3.8 billion of gross client outflows. The $2.5 billion of gross client inflows included $0.9 billion into our blended asset portfolios, $0.8 billion into our U.S. Equity products and $0.4 billion into our Non-U.S. Equity objectives. By contrast, for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, we had generated $1.9 billion of separate account gross client inflows, of which $1.0 billion were in blended asset products, with $0.4 billion of gross client inflows into U.S. Equity and $0.3 billion into Non-U.S. Equity products. Inflows into our separate account strategies were primarily driven by contributions from larger institutions and sub-advisory relationships into our U.S. Equity and Non-U.S. Equity strategies, and a smaller amount into our Fixed Income strategies. With regard to gross client outflows, $0.8 billion of the $3.8 billion in total outflows was the result of a single institutional relationship in our Non-U.S. Equity products in which the client transitioned its portfolio to passive strategies. The annualized separate account retention rate was 93% during the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and September 30, 2013.

Net client inflows of $0.7 billion into our mutual fund and collective investment trusts included gross client inflows of $4.7 billion offset by gross client outflows of $4.0 billion. Approximately $0.7 billion of net client inflows were achieved in our Life Cycle mutual fund and collective trust products, which includes both risk based and target date strategies. Net client outflows in our equity funds of $0.3 billion were driven primarily by outflowsNon-operating income reported in the ~~World Opportunities Series from certain platform relationships reducing their allocation to core international equities and relative underperformance, offset by net client~~

~~Table~~first quarter of ~~Contents~~

~~inflows into the Overseas Series and various non-U.S. collective investment trust vehicles from institutional and qualified plan clients.~~

~~Market appreciation during the~~ ~~nine months ended September 30,~~ 2014 ~~constituted a~~ ~~1.7%~~ ~~rate of increase in our total AUM. The investment gain was~~ ~~3.2%~~ ~~in separately managed accounts and flat in mutual funds and collective investment trusts.~~

~~The rates of change in AUM during the~~ ~~nine months ended September 30, 2014~~ ~~were comprised of increases of~~ 7% ~~and~~ ~~10.0%~~ ~~in our blended asset and fixed income portfolios respectively, and an decrease in our equity portfolio of~~ 6%~~. The rates of change in AUM from~~ ~~September 30, 2013~~ to ~~September 30, 2014~~ ~~were comprised of increases in our blended asset and fixed income portfolios of~~ ~~11%~~ ~~and 10% respectively, while our equity portfolio decreased by~~ 2%. Our fixed income portfolio increased primarily as a result of the Company’ acquisition of 2100 Xenon Group, LLC which includes a global managed futures strategy, a long/short global fixed income futures product, and a futures alpha product.

~~As of~~ ~~September 30, 2014, the composition of our AUM was~~ ~~48%~~ ~~in mutual funds and collective investment trusts and~~ ~~52%~~ ~~in separate accounts, compared to~~ ~~47%~~ ~~in mutual funds and collective investment trusts and~~ ~~53%~~ ~~in separate accounts at~~ ~~December 31, 2013~~ ~~and 47% in mutual funds and collective investment trusts and 53% in separate accounts at~~ ~~September 30, 2013. The composition of our AUM across portfolios at~~ ~~September 30, 2014~~ ~~was~~ ~~50%~~ ~~in blended assets,~~ ~~48%~~ ~~in equity, and~~ 2% ~~in fixed income, compared to~~ ~~47%~~ ~~in blended assets,~~ ~~51%~~ ~~in equity, and~~ 2% ~~in fixed income at~~ ~~December 31, 2013, and~~ ~~47%~~ ~~in blended assets,~~ ~~51%~~ ~~in equity, and~~ 2% ~~in fixed income at~~ ~~September 30, 2013~~.

~~Table of Contents~~

~~The following table sets forth our results of operations and other data for the~~ ~~nine months ended September 30, 2014~~ ~~and~~ ~~2013~~:

Nine months ended September 30, Period-to-Period
2014 2013 $ %
(in thousands, except share data)
Revenues
Investment management services revenue $ 307,129
$ 277,876
$ 29,253
11 %
Expenses
Compensation and related costs 159,457
140,739
18,718
13 %
Distribution, servicing and custody expenses 58,325
49,869
8,456
17 %
Other operating costs 25,867
23,235
2,632
11 %
Total operating expenses 243,649
213,843
29,806
14 %
Operating income 63,480
64,033
(553 ) (1 )%
Non-operating income (loss)
Non-operating income (loss), net 2,131
548
1,583
*
Income before provision for income taxes 65,611
64,581
1,030
2 %
Provision for income taxes 10,412
6,799
3,613
53 %
Net income attributable to controlling and noncontrolling interests 55,199
57,782
(2,583 ) (4 )%
Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interests 53,991
55,864
(1,873 ) (3 )%
Net income attributable to Manning & Napier, Inc. $ 1,208
$ 1,918
$ (710 ) (37 )%
Per Share Data
Net income per share available to Class A common stock
Basic $ 0.09
$ 0.14

Diluted $ 0.09
$ 0.14

Weighted average shares of Class A common stock outstanding
Basic 13,669,391
13,612,289

Diluted 13,822,402
13,673,499

Cash dividends declared per share of Class A common stock $ 0.48
$ 0.48

Other financial and operating data
Economic income ⁽¹⁾
$ 131,655
$ 127,374
$ 4,281
3 %
Economic net income ⁽¹⁾
$ 81,297
$ 78,653
$ 2,644
3 %
Economic net income per adjusted share ⁽¹⁾
$ 0.92
$ 0.88

Weighted average adjusted Class A common stock outstanding ⁽¹⁾
88,630,007
89,885,003

~~________________________~~


~~(1)~~	See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Supplemental Non-GAAP Financial Information” for Manning & Napier’s reasons for including these non-GAAP measures in this report in addition to a reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measures to GAAP measures for the periods indicated.


~~(*)~~	~~Percentage change not meaningful~~

~~Revenues~~

~~Our investment management services revenue~~ ~~increased~~ by ~~$29.3 million, or~~ ~~11%, to~~ ~~$307.1 million~~ ~~for the~~ ~~nine months ended September 30, 2014~~ ~~from~~ ~~$277.9 million~~ ~~for the~~ ~~nine months ended September 30, 2013. This~~ ~~increase~~ ~~was driven primarily by a~~ ~~$4.6 billion, or~~ ~~10%, increase in our average AUM to~~ ~~$52.3 billion~~ ~~for the~~ ~~nine months ended September 30, 2014~~ ~~from~~ ~~$47.7 billion~~ ~~for the~~ ~~nine months ended September 30, 2013~~.

~~Our average separately managed account fee remained consistent at 62 basis points for both the~~ ~~nine months ended September 30, 2014~~ ~~and the~~ ~~nine months ended September 30, 2013. For both the~~ ~~nine months ended September 30, 2014~~ ~~and~~

~~Table of Contents~~

~~2013, separately managed account management fees ranged from 15 basis points to 125 basis points, depending on investment objective and account size.~~

Our average fee on mutual fund and collective investment trust products was 87 basis points for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 slightly lower than 88 basis points for the nine months ended September 30, 2013. This decrease was primarily due to a shift in the mix of our AUM from higher fee mutual funds and collective investment trusts to those with lower fees. For both the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, mutual fund and collective investment trust management fees ranged from 24 basis points to 100 basis points, depending on investment strategy.

~~Operating Expenses~~

~~Our operating expenses increased by $29.8 million, or 14%, to $243.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 from $213.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013.~~

Compensation and related costs increased by $18.7 million, or 13%, to $159.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 from $140.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013. This increase was primarily attributable to ~~higher incentive compensation costs for our analyst team~~$2.1 million of income resulting from the strong absolute and relative investment performance of the Company over the trailing one, two and three-year time periods for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 compared to the prior year. Included within compensation and related costs is approximately $66.0 million and $62.8 million of non-cash reorganization-related share based compensation charges and $2.2 million and $1.1 million of equity-based compensation charges under our 2011 long-term incentive plan for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. When considered as a percentage of revenue, compensation and related costs excluding non-cash reorganization-related share-based compensation charges for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 was 30% compared to 28% in 2013.

Distribution, servicing and custody expenses increased by $8.5 million, or 17%, to $58.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 from $49.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013. The increase was generally attributable to a 15% increase in mutual funds and collective investment trusts average AUM for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2013. As a percentage of mutual fund and collective investment trust revenue, distribution, servicing and custody expenses was 35% for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, compared to 34% for the nine months ended September 30, 2013.

Other operating costs increased by $2.6 million, or 11%, to $25.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 from $23.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013. As a percentage of revenue, other operating costs for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 remained consistent with the nine months ended September 30, 2013 at 8%.

~~Non-Operating Income (Loss)~~

Non-operating income increased by $1.6 million to net income of $2.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 from $0.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013. The increase was primarily the result of a $2.1 million decrease in the amounts payable under the tax receivable agreement which we entered into in connection with our IPO. This decrease is the result of enacted changes in tax laws, ~~during the first quarter of 2014,~~ which reduced expected tax benefits and subsequent payment of such benefits under the tax receivable agreement. ~~This~~Excluding the impact from these tax law changes, the increase ~~was partially offset by a net decrease of $0.6 million~~ in non-operating income is primarily due to the performance on investments held by the Company to provide initial cash seeding for product development ~~purposes for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 compared to 2013.~~purposes.

Provision for Income Taxes

The Company’s tax provision ~~increased~~decreased by ~~$3.6~~$2.6 million,, or ~~53%~~51%, to ~~$10.4~~$2.5 million for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 from ~~$6.8~~$5.1 million for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2013~~.March 31, 2014. The ~~increase~~decrease was primarily the result of a ~~$2.5~~$2.2 million impact from enacted changes in tax laws during the three months ended March 31, 2014 that lowered the Company's expectation of the future tax benefits under the tax receivable agreement. The remaining ~~increase~~decrease is driven by ~~increases~~a decrease in ~~expected~~ taxable earnings as compared to the prior year.

Supplemental Non-GAAP Financial Information

To provide investors with greater insight, promote transparency and allow for a more comprehensive understanding of the information used by management in its financial and operational decision-making, we supplement our consolidated statements of operations presented on a GAAP basis with non-GAAP financial measures of earnings.

Table of Contents

Management ~~uses~~used economic income and continues to use economic net income, and economic net income per adjusted share as financial measures to evaluate the profitability and efficiency of its business.

Economic income and economic net income are not presented in accordance with GAAP. Economic income ~~excludes~~for periods prior to the first quarter of 2015, excluded from income before provision for income taxes the reorganization-related share-based compensation, which ~~results~~resulted in non-cash compensation expense reported over the vesting period. Upon the consummation of our initial public offering, the vesting terms

~~Table of Contents~~

related to the ownership ofby our employees, ~~were modified, including our named executive officers,~~ other than William ~~Manning. Such individuals~~Manning, were ~~entitled to 15%~~modified such that 85% of their ~~pre-IPO~~pre-initial public offering ownership interests ~~upon the consummation of our initial public offering, and 15% of their pre-IPO ownership interests over the subsequent three years. The remaining ownership interests are~~were subject to service and performance-based vesting ~~over such three-year period.~~through 2014. Such new vesting terms ~~will~~did not result in an increase to the number of outstanding shares of the Company’s Class A common stock or the adjusted share count. As a result of such vesting requirements, the Company ~~will recognize~~recognized non-cash compensation charges through 2014. For the three months ended March 31, 2015, economic income is equivalent to income before provision for income taxes.

Economic net income is a non-GAAP measure of after-tax operating performance and equals the Company’s economic income less adjusted income taxes. Adjusted income taxes are estimated assuming the exchange of all outstanding units of Manning & Napier Group into Class A common stock on a one-to-one basis. Therefore, all income of Manning & Napier Group allocated to the units of Manning & Napier Group is treated as if it were allocated to the Company and represents an estimate of income tax expense at an effective rate of 37% on income before taxes for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 38.25% on economic income for each ~~respective~~other period, reflecting assumed federal, state and local income taxes. Economic net income per adjusted share is equal to economic net income divided by the weighted average adjusted Class A common shares outstanding. The number of weighted average adjusted Class A common shares outstanding for all periods presented is determined by assuming the weighted average exchangeable units of Manning & Napier Group and unvested restricted stock units (RSUs) are converted into our outstanding Class A common stock as of the respective reporting date, on a one-to-one basis. The Company’s management uses economic net income, among other financial data, to determine the earnings available to distribute as dividends to holders of its Class A common stock and to the holders of the units of Manning & Napier Group.

Non-GAAP measures are not a substitute for financial measures prepared in accordance with GAAP. Additionally, the Company’s non-GAAP measures may differ from similar measures used by other companies, even if similar terms are used to identify such measures.

The following table sets forth our other financial and operating data for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 and ~~2013~~2014:


	Three months ended September 30,				Nine months ended September 30,				Three months ended March 31,
	2014		2013		2014		2013		2015		2014
	(in thousands, except share data)								(in thousands, except share data)
Economic income	$	43,632	$	43,252	$	131,655	$	127,374	$	38,590	$	44,661
Economic net income	$	26,943	$	26,707	$	81,297	$	78,653	$	24,312	$	27,578
Economic net income per adjusted share	$	0.31	$	0.30	$	0.92	$	0.88	$	0.28	$	0.31
Weighted average adjusted Class A common stock outstanding	88,147,234		89,912,186		88,630,007		89,885,003		88,078,806		89,889,021

3429

Table of Contents

The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, a reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measures to GAAP measures:


	Three months ended September 30,						Nine months ended September 30,						Three months ended March 31,
	2014			2013			2014			2013			2015			2014
	(in thousands, except share data)												(in thousands, except share data)
Net income attributable to Manning & Napier, Inc.	$	428		$	1,314		$	1,208		$	1,918		$	3,309		$	81
Plus: net income attributable to noncontrolling interests	19,392			21,479			53,991			55,864			32,802			17,563
Net income attributable to controlling and noncontrolling interests	19,820			22,793			55,199			57,782			36,111			17,644
Provision for income taxes	2,976			2,222			10,412			6,799			2,479			5,076
Income before provision for income taxes	22,796			25,015			65,611			64,581			38,590			22,720
Reorganization-related share-based compensation	20,836			18,237			66,044			62,793			—			21,941
Economic income	43,632			43,252			131,655			127,374			38,590			44,661
Adjusted income taxes	16,689			16,545			50,358			48,721			14,278			17,083
Economic net income	$	26,943		$	26,707		$	81,297		$	78,653		$	24,312		$	27,578

Net income available to Class A common stock per basic share	$	0.03		$	0.10		$	0.09		$	0.14		$	0.24		$	0.01
Plus: net income attributable to noncontrolling interests per basic share	1.41			1.57			3.95			4.11			2.39			1.29
Net income attributable to controlling and noncontrolling interests per basic share	1.44			1.67			4.04			4.25			2.63			1.30
Provision for income taxes per basic share	0.22			0.16			0.76			0.50			0.18			0.37
Income before provision for income taxes per basic share	1.66			1.83			4.80			4.75			2.81			1.67
Reorganization-related share-based compensation per basic share	1.52			1.34			4.83			4.61			—			1.61
Economic income per basic share	3.18			3.17			9.63			9.36			2.81			3.28
Adjusted income taxes per basic share	1.22			1.21			3.68			3.58			1.04			1.25
Economic net income per basic share	1.96			1.96			5.95			5.78			1.77			2.03
Less: impact of Manning & Napier Group, LLC units and unvested restricted stock units converted to Class A common stock	(1.65		)	(1.66		)	(5.03		)	(4.90		)	(1.49		)	(1.72		)
Economic net income per adjusted share	$	0.31		$	0.30		$	0.92		$	0.88		$	0.28		$	0.31
Weighted average shares of Class A common stock outstanding - Basic	13,705,134			13,634,246			13,669,391			13,612,289			13,713,540			13,634,401
Weighted average exchangeable units of Manning & Napier Group, LLC	73,574,338			75,861,023			74,361,099			76,037,530			73,511,251			75,837,703
Weighted average restricted stock units	867,762			416,917			599,517			235,184			854,015			416,917
Weighted average adjusted Class A common stock outstanding	88,147,234			89,912,186			88,630,007			89,885,003			88,078,806			89,889,021

3530

Table of Contents

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Historically, our cash and liquidity needs have been met primarily through cash generated by our operations. Our current financial condition is highly liquid, with a significant amount of our assets comprised of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, amounts due from broker and investment securities held by us for the purpose of providing initial cash seeding for product development purposes. The following table sets forth certain key financial data relating to our liquidity and capital resources as of ~~September 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 and December 31, ~~2013~~2014.


	September 30, 2014		December 31, 2013		March 31, 2015		December 31, 2014
	(in thousands)				(in thousands)
Cash and cash equivalents	$	118,857	$	125,250	$	80,377	$	124,992
Accounts receivable	$	41,411	$	40,601	$	35,134	$	39,283
Due from broker	$	5,567	$	5,816	$	4,909	$	5,391
Due from broker - consolidated funds					$	5,032	$	—
Investment securities	$	25,782	$	21,321	$	25,210	$	26,915
Amounts payable under tax receivable agreement ⁽¹⁾	$	41,217	$	44,030	$	41,266	$	41,249

________________________


(1)	In light of numerous factors affecting our obligation to make such payments, the timing and amounts of any such actual payments are based on our best estimate as of ~~September 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 and December 31, ~~2013~~2014, including our ability to realize the expected tax benefits. Actual payments may significantly differ from estimated payments.

In determining the sufficiency of liquidity and capital resources to fund our business, we regularly monitor our liquidity position, including among other things, cash, working capital, long-term liabilities, lease commitments and operating company distributions. WeOn April 23, 2015, we entered into a $100.0 million revolving credit agreement and also ~~maintain a~~terminated our previously existing and unused $10.0 million line of ~~credit, which was unused as~~credit. See Note 14, "Subsequent Events" to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 1 of ~~and~~Part I of this Form 10-Q for ~~the nine months ended September 30, 2014.~~ additional information.

We believe cash generated from operations will be sufficient over the next twelve months to meet our working capital requirements. Further, we expect that cash on hand, ~~and~~ cash generated by operations and availability under our credit agreement will be sufficient to meet our liquidity needs for the foreseeable future.

Cash Flows

The following table sets forth our cash flows for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 and ~~2013~~2014. Operating activities consist primarily of net income subject to adjustments for changes in operating assets and liabilities, equity-based compensation expense, ~~change~~changes in ~~payment~~the liability under the tax receivable agreement, deferred income tax expense and ~~depreciation.~~depreciation and amortization. Investing activities consist primarily of the purchase and sale of investments for the purpose of providing initial cash seeding for product development purposes, as well as purchases of property and ~~equipment and net cash paid for acquisitions.~~equipment. Financing activities consist primarily of distributions to noncontrolling interests, dividends paid on our Class A common stock and purchases of Class A units held by noncontrolling interests of Manning & Napier Group.


	Nine months ended September 30,						Three months ended March 31,
	2014			2013			2015			2014
	(in thousands)						(in thousands)
Net cash provided by operating activities	$	123,180		$	119,591		$	20,511		$	30,386
Net cash used in investing activities	(8,732		)	(6,583		)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities							1,393			(3,269		)
Net cash used in financing activities	(120,841		)	(95,038		)	(66,519		)	(33,660		)
Net change in cash and cash equivalents	$	(6,393	)	$	17,970		$	(44,615	)	$	(6,543	)

~~Nine~~Three months ended ~~September 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 Compared to ~~Nine~~Three months ended ~~September 30, 2013~~March 31, 2014

Operating Activities

Operating activities provided $~~123.2~~20.5 million and $~~119.6~~30.4 million of net cash for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 and ~~2013~~2014, respectively. This overall $~~3.6~~9.9 million ~~increase~~decrease in net cash provided by operating activities for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 compared to ~~2013~~2014 was ~~mainly~~ due to ~~an increase~~a decrease in net income after adjustment for non-cash items of approximately $~~2.6~~4.6 million driven by ~~increased~~decreased revenues resulting primarily from ~~an increase~~changes in our average AUM. ~~This increase~~The decrease was also due to ~~an increase of~~ ~~$1.0 million~~ ~~in operating assets and liabilities, primarily accounts payable.~~

~~Investing Activities~~

Investing activities used $8.7 million and $6.6 million of net cash for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. This overall $2.1 million increase in net cash used by investing activities was primarily due to $2.1 million

3631

Table of Contents

$5.0 million of cash used by consolidated funds as collateral for ~~acquisitions during~~managed futures trading activity, as well as a decrease of $0.3 million in operating assets and liabilities.

Investing Activities

Investing activities provided $1.4 million and used $3.3 million of net cash for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2015 and 2014, ~~and an increase in property and equipment purchases of $1.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 compared to 2013.~~respectively. The increase in ~~property and equipment purchases is mainly driven by an increase in leasehold improvements for our primary office facility in Fairport, New York. The overall increase in net~~ cash ~~used~~provided by investing activities was ~~partially offset~~primarily driven by ~~a decrease~~changes in investing activities of $4.3 million due to the Company's funding of and timing of activity within our investment securities designated as trading for the seeding of new products. In addition, property and equipment purchases decreased by $0.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2015 compared to 2014.

Financing Activities

Financing activities used $~~120.8~~66.5 million and $~~95.0~~33.7 million of net cash for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 and ~~2013~~2014, respectively. This overall $~~25.8~~32.9 million increase in net cash used in financing activities was primarily the result of the increase in distributions to noncontrolling interests of $26.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2015 compared to 2014, due to the timing of the distributions to noncontrolling interests for the three months ended March 31, 2014 occurring in the second quarter of 2014. In addition, the Company utilized an additional $6.0 million of cash related to the purchase of Class A units of Manning & Napier Group pursuant to the exchange agreement entered into at the time of ~~$32.4~~the Company's initial public offering of $36.3 million in ~~2014 as~~2015, compared ~~$7.4~~$30.3 million in ~~2013~~2014. This increase in cash used was due to ~~an increase in the~~a larger number of units exchanged in ~~2014. The increase in net cash used was also attributed to an increase in dividends paid on our Class A common stock of~~ ~~$1.1 million~~ ~~during the~~ ~~nine months ended September 30, 2014~~ ~~due to the payment of the additional $0.08 per share dividend declared in 2013 and paid in 2014.~~2015.

Dividends

On October 25, 2013, the Board of Directors declared a $0.24 per share dividend to the holders of Class A common stock. The dividend was paid on February 3, 2014 to shareholders of record as of January 15, 2014.

On March 7, 2014, the Board of Directors declared a $0.16 per share dividend to the holders of Class A common stock. The dividend was paid on May 1, 2014 to shareholders of record as of April 15, 2014.

On May 6, 2014, the Board of Directors declared a $0.16 per share dividend to the holders of Class A common stock. The dividend was paid on August 1, 2014 to shareholders of record as of July 15, 2014.

On August 5, 2014, the Board of Directors declared a $0.16 per share dividend to the holders of Class A common stock. The dividend was paid on November 3, 2014 to shareholders of record as of October 15, 2014.

On October 29, 2014, the Board of Directors declared a $0.24 per share dividend to the holders of Class A common stock. The dividend ~~is payable~~was paid on ~~or about~~ February 2, 2015 to shareholders of record as of January 15, 2015.

On March 6, 2015, the Board of Directors declared a $0.16 per share divided to the holders of Class A common stock. The dividend was paid on May 1, 2015 to shareholders of record as of April 15, 2015.

On May 6, 2015, the Board of Directors declared a $0.16 per share dividend to the holders of Class A common stock. The dividend is payable on or about August 3, 2015 to shareholders of record as of July 15, 2015.

We currently intend to pay quarterly cash dividends of our Class A common stock. We intend to fund such dividends from our portion of distributions made by Manning & Napier Group, from its available cash generated from operations. William Manning, as the holder of our Class B common stock, will not be entitled to any cash dividends in his capacity as a Class B stockholder, but will, in his capacity as an indirect holder of Class A units of Manning & Napier Group, generally participate on a pro rata basis in distributions by Manning & Napier Group.

The declaration and payment of all future dividends, if any, will be at the sole discretion of our board of directors. In determining the amount of any future dividends, our board of directors will take into account:

the financial results of Manning & Napier Group;

our available cash, as well as anticipated cash requirements, including any debt servicing and payments required under the tax receivable agreement;

our capital requirements and the capital requirements of our subsidiaries, including Manning & Napier Group;

contractual, legal, tax and regulatory restrictions on, and implications of, the payment of dividends by us to our stockholders or distributions by Manning & Napier Group to us, including the obligation of Manning & Napier Group to make tax distributions to its unitholders, including us;

general economic and business conditions; and

any other factors that our board of directors may deem relevant.

We have no material assets other than our ownership of Class A units of Manning & Napier Group and, accordingly, will depend on distributions from Manning & Napier Group to fund any dividends we may pay. As managing member of Manning & Napier Group, we will determine the timing and amount of any distributions to be paid to its members, other than mandatory tax distributions required under Manning & Napier Group's operating agreement. We intend to cause Manning & Napier Group to distribute cash to its members, including us, in an amount sufficient to cover dividends, if any, declared by us. If we do cause Manning & Napier Group to make such distributions, M&N Group Holdings, MNCC and any other holders of units of Manning & Napier Group will be entitled to receive equivalent distributions on a pari passu basis.

Contractual Obligations

3732

Table of Contents

There have been no material changes in our contractual obligations as set forth in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2013~~2014.

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

We did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements as of ~~September 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Market Risk

Our exposure to market risk is directly related to the role of our operating company as an investment advisor for the mutual funds and separate accounts it manages. Substantially all of our revenues are derived from investment management agreements with these funds and accounts. Under these agreements, the investment management fees we receive are based on the value of our AUM and our fee rates. Accordingly, our revenues and net income may decline as a result of our AUM decreasing due to depreciation of our investment portfolios. In addition, such a decline could cause our clients to withdraw their funds in favor of investments offering higher returns or lower risk, which would cause our revenues to decline further.

The value of our AUM was $~~51.1~~45.6 billion as of ~~September 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015. Assuming a 10% increase or decrease in the value of our AUM and the change being proportionally distributed over all our products, the value would increase or decrease by approximately $~~5.1~~4.6 billion, which would cause an annualized increase or decrease in revenues of approximately $~~39.9~~35.6 million at our current weighted average fee rate of 0.78%.

We have not adopted a corporate-level risk management policy regarding client assets, nor have we attempted to hedge at the corporate level the market risks that would affect the value of our overall AUM and related revenues. Some of these risks (e.g., sector risks and currency risks) are inherent in certain strategies, and clients may invest in particular strategies to gain exposure to these risks.

We also are subject to market risk from a decline in the prices of investment securities that we own. These securities consist primarily of equity securities, fixed-income securities and investments in mutual funds, including the Fund for which MNA provides advisory services. The value of these investment securities was $~~25.8~~25.2 million as of ~~September 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 of which $~~23.7~~23.1 million is classified as trading, and $2.1 million is classified as available-for-sale. Management regularly monitors the value of these investments; however, given their nature and relative size, we have not adopted a specific risk management policy to manage the associated market risk. Assuming a 10% increase or decrease in the values of these investment securities, the fair value would increase or decrease by approximately $~~2.6~~2.5 million at ~~September 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015. Due to the nature of our business, we believe that we do not face any material risk from inflation.

Exchange Rate Risk

A substantial portion of the accounts that we advise, or sub-advise, hold investments that are denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. Movements in the rate of exchange between the U.S. dollar and the underlying foreign currency affect the values of assets held in accounts we manage, thereby affecting the amount of revenues we earn. The value of the assets we manage was $~~51.1~~45.6 billion as of ~~September 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015. As of ~~September 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015, approximately ~~28%~~24% of our AUM across our investment strategies was invested in securities denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. To the extent our AUM are denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar, the value of those AUM would decrease, with an increase in the value of the U.S. dollar, or increase, with a decrease in the value of the U.S. dollar.

We monitor our exposure to exchange rate risk and make decisions on how to manage such risk accordingly; however, we have not adopted a corporate-level risk management policy to manage exchange rate risk. Assuming that ~~28%~~24% of our AUM is invested in securities denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar and excluding the impact of any hedging arrangements, a 10% increase or decrease in the value of the U.S. dollar would increase or decrease the fair value of our AUM by approximately $~~1.5~~1.1 billion, which would cause an annualized increase or decrease in revenues of approximately $~~11.4~~8.5 million at our current weighted average fee rate of 0.78%.

Interest Rate Risk

~~The~~At March 31, 2015, the Company iswas exposed to interest-rate risk primarily due to our AUM that is invested in debt securities, as well as corporate assets that are invested in debt securities. At certain times, we may invest excess cash balances in money market funds that invest primarily in U.S. Treasury or agency-backed money market instruments. These funds attempt to maintain a stable net asset value but interest rate changes may affect the fair value of such investments and, if significant, could result in a loss of investment principal. Interest rate changes affect the income we earn from our excess cash balances. Management considered a hypothetical 100 basis point fluctuation in interest rates and estimated the impact of such a fluctuation on these investments. Management determined there was no material impact as of ~~September 30, 2014.~~March 31, 2015. Additionally, given the current level of income we earn from our cash and cash equivalent balances, interest rate changes would not have a material impact on us.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

3833

Table of Contents

Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of ~~September 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 pursuant to Rule 13a-15 under the Exchange Act. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of ~~September 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015, our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act) were effective to ensure that information we are required to disclose in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended ~~September 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

3934

Table of Contents

PART II—OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1A. Risk Factors

We have set forth in Item 1A to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2013~~2014 risk factors relating to our business, our industry, our structure and our Class A common stock. Readers of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are referred to such Item 1A for a more complete understanding of risks concerning our company. There have been no material changes in our risk factors since those published in such Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2013.~~2014.

Item 6. Exhibits



Exhibit No.		Description

10.1		Credit Agreement, dated April 23, 2015, among Manning & Napier, Inc. and Manning & Napier Group, LLC and Manning & Napier Advisors, LLC, as borrowers, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as administrative agent, lender, swingline lender and issuing bank, Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company, as syndication agent and lender, and First Niagara Bank, The Bank of New York Mellon, and The Huntington National Bank, as lenders. (1)

10.2		Guaranty, dated April 23, 2015, of the obligations of the Borrowers under the Credit Agreement, given to the Lenders by Manning & Napier, Inc. and the following direct or indirect subsidiaries of Manning & Napier Group, LLC: Manning & Napier Alternative Opportunities, LLC, Manning & Napier Information Services, LLC, Perspective Partners, LLC, Manning & Napier Benefits, LLC, M&N Alternatives Management, LLC, and M&N Xenon Partners Holdings, LLC. (2)

10.3		Form of Redemption Agreement between M&N Group Holdings, LLC and Manning & Napier Group, LLC, dated March 31, 2015 (3)

10.4		Form of Redemption Agreement between Manning & Napier Capital Company and Manning & Napier Group, LLC, dated March 31, 2015 (4)

31.1		Certification of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

31.2		Certification of the Company’s Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.1		Certification of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.2		Certification of the Company’s Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

101		Materials from the Manning & Napier, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended ~~September 30, 2014,~~March 31, 2015, formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL): (i) Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Operations, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, (iv) Consolidated Statement of Shareholders’ Equity, (v) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (vi) related Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.

__________________________


(1)	Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 24, 2015


(2)	Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.2 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 24, 2015


(3)	Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 30, 2015


(4)	Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.2 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 30, 2015

4035

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.



	MANNING & NAPIER, INC.

Dated: ~~November 10, 2014~~May 7, 2015	By:	/s/ PATRICK CUNNINGHAM
		Patrick Cunningham
		Chief Executive Officer
		(principal executive officer)

		/s/ JAMES MIKOLAICHIK
		James Mikolaichik
		Chief Financial Officer
		(principal financial and accounting officer)

4136



	Service-Based Stock Units	Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
Stock unit awards outstanding at January 1, 2014	1,458,049	$	12.00
Granted	—	$	—
Vested	—	$	—
Forfeited	—	$	—
Stock unit awards outstanding at September 30, 2014	1,458,049	$	12.00



	Performance-Based Stock Units		Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
Stock unit awards outstanding at January 1, 2014	—		$	—
Granted	37,577		$	16.78
Vested	(37,577	)	$	16.78
Forfeited	—		$	—
Stock unit awards outstanding at September 30, 2014	—		$	—

Large accelerated filer

Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer

¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Smaller reporting company