UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
x
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2017March 31, 2018
OR
o
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from                   to                   
 
Commission file number 001-36174
NMI Holdings, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

DELAWARE 45-4914248
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
   
2100 Powell Street, Emeryville, CA 94608
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

(855) 530-6642
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
YES x NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
YES x NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" "smaller reporting company" and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer o
Accelerated filer x
Non-accelerated filer o
Smaller reporting company o
  (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) 
Emerging growth company x


   
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
YES o NO x

The number of shares of common stock, $0.01 par value per share, of the registrant outstanding on October 30, 2017April 27, 2018 was 60,033,14465,573,093 shares.



TABLE OF CONTENTS
Item 1.
Item 2.
Item 3.
Item 4.
Item 1.
Item 1A.
Item 6.



CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
This report contains forward looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (Securities Act), Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (Exchange Act), and the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Any statements about our expectations, beliefs, plans, predictions, forecasts, objectives, assumptions or future events or performance are not historical facts and may be forward looking. These statements are often, but not always, made through the use of words or phrases such as "anticipate," "believe," "can," "could," "may," "predict," "potential," "should," "will," "estimate," "plan," "project," "continuing," "ongoing," "expect," "intend" or words of similar meaning and include, but are not limited to, statements regarding the outlook for our future business and financial performance. All forward looking statements are necessarily only estimates of future results, and actual results may differ materially from expectations. You are, therefore, cautioned not to place undue reliance on such statements which should be read in conjunction with the other cautionary statements that are included elsewhere in this report. Further, any forward looking statement speaks only as of the date on which it is made and we undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which the statement is made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. We have based these forward looking statements on our current expectations and projections about future events and financial trends that we believe may affect our financial condition, operating results, business strategy and financial needs. There are important factors that could cause our actual results, level of activity, performance or achievements to differ materially from the results, level of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward looking statements including, but not limited to:
changes in the business practices of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac (collectively, the GSEs), including decisions that have the impact of decreasing or discontinuing the use of mortgage insurance as credit enhancement;
our ability to remain an eligible mortgage insurer under the private mortgage insurer eligibility requirements (PMIERs) and other requirements imposed by the GSEs, which they may change at any time;
retention of our existing certificates of authority in each state and the District of Columbia (D.C.) and our ability to remain a mortgage insurer in good standing in each state and D.C.;
our future profitability, liquidity and capital resources;
actions of existing competitors, including governmental agencies like the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) and the Veterans Administration (VA), and potential market entry by new competitors or consolidation of existing competitors;
developments in the world's financial and capital markets and our access to such markets, including reinsurance;
adoption of new or changes to existing laws and regulations that impact our business or financial condition directly or the mortgage insurance industry generally or their enforcement and implementation by regulators;
changes to the GSEs' role in the secondary mortgage market or other changes that could affect the residential mortgage industry generally or mortgage insurance in particular;
potential future lawsuits, investigations or inquiries or resolution of current lawsuits or inquiries;
changes in general economic, market and political conditions and policies, interest rates, inflation and investment results or other conditions that affect the housing market or the markets for home mortgages or mortgage insurance;
our ability to successfully execute and implement our capital plans, including our ability to access the capital, credit and reinsurance marketmarkets and to enter into, and receive approval of, reinsurance arrangements on terms and conditions that are acceptable to us, the GSEs and our regulators;
our ability to implement our business strategy, including our ability to write mortgage insurance on high quality low down payment residential mortgage loans, implement successfully and on a timely basis, complex infrastructure, systems, procedures, and internal controls to support our business and regulatory and reporting requirements of the insurance industry;
our ability to attract and retain a diverse customer base, including the largest mortgage originators;
failure of risk management or pricing or investment strategies;
emergence of unexpected claim and coverage issues, including claims exceeding our reserves or amounts we had expected to experience;
potential adverse impacts arising from recent natural disasters, including, with respect to the affected areas, a decline in new business, adverse effects on home prices, and an increase in notices of default on insured mortgages;


the inability of our counter-parties, including third party reinsurers, to meet their obligations to us;
our ability to utilize our net operating loss carryforwards, which could be limited or eliminated in various ways, including if we experience an ownership change as defined in Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code;
failure to maintain, improve and continue to develop necessary information technology (IT) systems or the failure of technology providers to perform; and
ability to recruit, train and retain key personnel.
For more information regarding these risks and uncertainties as well as certain additional risks that we face, you should refer to Part I, Item 2, "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and elsewhere in this report on Form 10-Q, including the exhibits hereto. In addition, for additional discussion of those risks and uncertainties that have the potential to affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows or prospects in a material and adverse manner, you should review the Risk Factors in Part II, Item 1A of this report and in Part I, Item 1A, of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016 (20162017 (2017 10-K), as subsequently updated in other reports we file from time to time with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
Unless expressly indicated or the context requires otherwise, the terms "we," "our," "us" and the "Company" in this document refer to NMI Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and its wholly owned subsidiaries on a consolidated basis.



PART I

Item 1. Financial Statements



INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2017March 31, 2018 and December 31, 20162017
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income for the three and nine months ended September 30,March 31, 2018 and 2017 and 2016
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity for the ninethree months ended September 30, 2017March 31, 2018 and the year ended December 31, 20162017
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the ninethree months ended September 30,March 31, 2018 and 2017 and 2016
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

NMI HOLDINGS, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (UNAUDITED)


September 30, 2017 December 31, 2016March 31, 2018 December 31, 2017
Assets(In Thousands, except for share data)(In Thousands, except for share data)
Fixed maturities, available-for-sale, at fair value (amortized cost of $687,284 and $630,688 as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively)$692,729
 $628,969
Fixed maturities, available-for-sale, at fair value (amortized cost of $733,153 and $713,859 as of March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively)$723,790
 $715,875
Cash and cash equivalents20,698
 47,746
101,890
 19,196
Premiums receivable21,056
 13,728
28,164
 25,179
Accrued investment income4,598
 3,421
4,765
 4,212
Prepaid expenses2,651
 1,991
3,602
 2,151
Deferred policy acquisition costs, net36,101
 30,109
40,026
 37,925
Software and equipment, net21,767
 20,402
22,857
 22,802
Intangible assets and goodwill3,634
 3,634
3,634
 3,634
Prepaid reinsurance premiums39,915
 37,921
38,557
 40,250
Deferred tax asset, net38,490
 51,434
16,343
 19,929
Other assets4,973
 542
3,963
 3,695
Total assets$886,612
 $839,897
$987,591
 $894,848
      
Liabilities      
Term loan$143,969
 $144,353
$143,868
 $143,882
Unearned premiums161,345
 152,906
165,590
 163,166
Accounts payable and accrued expenses22,028
 25,297
21,218
 23,364
Reserve for insurance claims and claim expenses6,123
 3,001
10,391
 8,761
Reinsurance funds withheld33,105
 30,633
33,179
 34,102
Deferred ceding commission4,971
 4,831
4,838
 5,024
Warrant liability, at fair value4,046
 3,367
6,563
 7,472
Total liabilities375,587
 364,388
385,647
 385,771
Commitments and contingencies

 



 

      
Shareholders' equity      
Common stock - class A shares, $0.01 par value;
59,928,092 and 59,145,161 shares issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively (250,000,000 shares authorized)
599
 591
Common stock - class A shares, $0.01 par value;
65,569,342 and 60,517,512 shares issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively (250,000,000 shares authorized)
656
 605
Additional paid-in capital583,447
 576,927
666,905
 585,488
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax(630) (5,287)(13,533) (2,859)
Accumulated deficit(72,391) (96,722)(52,084) (74,157)
Total shareholders' equity511,025
 475,509
601,944
 509,077
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity$886,612
 $839,897
$987,591
 $894,848
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
NMI HOLDINGS, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (UNAUDITED)


For the three months ended September 30,
For the nine months ended September 30,
For the three months ended March 31,

2017 2016
2017
2016
2018
2017
Revenues(In Thousands, except for share data) (In Thousands, except for per share data)
Net premiums earned$44,519
 $31,808
 $115,661
 $77,656
 $54,914
 $33,225
Net investment income4,170
 3,544
 11,885
 10,117
 4,574
 3,807
Net realized investment gains (losses)69
 66
 198
 (758)
Net realized investment losses 
 (58)
Other revenues195
 102
 461
 172
 64
 80
Total revenues48,953
 35,520
 128,205
 87,187
 59,552
 37,054
Expenses           
Insurance claims and claims expenses957
 664
 2,965
 1,592
Insurance claims and claim expenses 1,569
 635
Underwriting and operating expenses24,645
 24,037
 78,682
 69,943
 28,453
 25,989
Total expenses25,602
 24,701
 81,647
 71,535
 30,022
 26,624
Other expense           
Loss from change in fair value of warrant liability(502) (797) (679) (187)
Gain (Loss) from change in fair value of warrant liability 420
 (196)
Interest expense(3,352) (3,733) (10,146) (11,072) (3,419) (3,494)
Total other expense(3,854) (4,530) (10,825) (11,259) (2,999) (3,690)
           
Income before income taxes19,497
 6,289
 35,733
 4,393
 26,531
 6,740
Income tax expense7,185
 114
 11,917
 114
 4,176
 1,248
Net income$12,312
 $6,175
 $23,816
 $4,279
 $22,355
 $5,492

           
Earnings per share           
Basic$0.21
 $0.10
 $0.40
 $0.07
 $0.36
 $0.09
Diluted$0.20
 $0.10
 $0.38
 $0.07
 $0.34
 $0.09

           
Weighted average common shares outstanding           
Basic59,883,629
 59,130,401
 59,680,166
 59,047,758
 62,099
 59,184
Diluted63,088,958
 60,284,746
 62,773,333
 59,861,916
 65,697
 62,339

           
Net income$12,312
 $6,175
 $23,816
 $4,279
 $22,355
 $5,492
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:           
Net unrealized gain (loss) in accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax expense of $366 and $0 for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and $2,439 and $0 for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016768
 (82) 4,786
 17,690
Reclassification adjustment for realized losses (gains) included in net income, net of tax expense of $24 and $0 for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and $69 and $0 for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016(45) (66) (129) 758
Net unrealized (losses) gains in accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax benefit of $423 and tax expense $664 for the quarters ended March 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively (10,956) 1,175
Reclassification adjustment for realized losses included in net income, net of tax expenses of $0 for the quarters ended March 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively 
 58
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax723

(148)
4,657

18,448

(10,956)
1,233
Comprehensive income$13,035

$6,027

$28,473

$22,727

$11,399

$6,725
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
NMI HOLDINGS, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY (UNAUDITED)


Common Stock - Class AAdditional
Paid-in Capital
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)Accumulated DeficitTotalCommon Stock - Class AAdditional
Paid-in Capital
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)Accumulated DeficitTotal
SharesAmountSharesAmount
(In Thousands)(In Thousands)
Balances, January 1, 201658,808
$588
$570,340
$(7,474)$(160,723)$402,731
Balances, January 1, 201759,145
$591
$576,927
$(5,287)$(96,722)$475,509
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle

388

515
903
Common stock: class A shares issued related to warrants32
*
183


183
Common stock: class A shares issued under stock plans, net of shares withheld for employee taxes337
3
(227)

(224)1,341
14
(1,494)

(1,480)
Share-based compensation expense

6,814


6,814


9,484


9,484
Change in unrealized investment gains/losses, net of tax expense of $1,178


2,187

2,187
Change in unrealized investment gains/losses, net of tax expense of $1,307


2,428

2,428
Net income



64,001
64,001




22,050
22,050
Balances, December 31, 201659,145
$591
$576,927
$(5,287)$(96,722)$475,509
Balances, December 31, 201760,518
$605
$585,488
$(2,859)$(74,157)$509,077
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle

388

515
903



282
(282)
Common stock: class A shares issued related to public offering4,255
43
79,122


79,165
Common stock: class A shares issued related to warrants26
*
489


489
Common stock: class A shares issued under stock plans, net of shares withheld for employee taxes783
8
(801)

(793)770
8
(999)

(991)
Share-based compensation expense

6,933


6,933


2,805


2,805
Change in unrealized investment gains/losses, net of tax expense of $2,508


4,657

4,657
Change in unrealized investment gains/losses, net of tax benefit of $423


(10,956)
(10,956)
Net income



23,816
23,816




22,355
22,355
Balances, September 30, 201759,928
$599
$583,447
$(630)$(72,391)$511,025
Balances, March 31, 201865,569
$656
$666,905
$(13,533)$(52,084)$601,944

* During the year ended December 31, 2017 and the three months ended March 31, 2018, we issued 32,368 and 25,686 common shares, respectively, with a par value of $0.01 related to the exercise of warrants, which is not identifiable in this schedule due to rounding.


See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
NMI HOLDINGS, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)


For the nine months ended September 30,For the three months ended March 31,
2017 20162018 2017
Cash flows from operating activities(In Thousands)(In Thousands)
Net income$23,816
 $4,279
$22,355
 $5,492
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:   
Net realized investment (gains) losses(198) 758
Loss from change in fair value of warrant liability679
 187
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:   
Net realized investment losses
 58
(Gain) Loss from change in fair value of warrant liability(420) 196
Depreciation and amortization4,871
 4,300
1,858
 1,502
Net amortization of premium on investment securities1,200
 954
439
 357
Amortization of debt discount and debt issuance costs1,112
 1,416
361
 403
Share-based compensation expense6,933
 4,987
2,805
 1,911
Deferred income taxes11,340
 
4,009
 1,146
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:      
Premiums receivable(7,328) (6,235)(2,985) (1,838)
Accrued investment income(1,177) (742)(553) (479)
Prepaid expenses(660) (885)(1,451) (944)
Deferred policy acquisition costs, net(5,992) (11,381)(2,101) (2,056)
Other assets(1,150) (2)(268) (192)
Unearned premiums8,439
 54,628
2,424
 1,805
Reserve for insurance claims and claims expenses3,122
 1,454
Reserve for insurance claims and claim expenses1,630
 760
Reinsurance balances, net618
 (431)584
 141
Accounts payable and accrued expenses(3,847) (1,075)(7,556) (10,351)
Net cash provided by operating activities41,778
 52,212
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities21,131
 (2,089)
Cash flows from investing activities      
Purchase of short-term investments(111,551) (147,639)(16,858) (38,663)
Purchase of fixed-maturity investments, available-for-sale(166,640) (103,418)(74,095) (60,212)
Proceeds from maturity of short-term investments142,722
 93,916
31,309
 46,845
Proceeds from redemptions, maturities and sale of fixed-maturity investments, available-for-sale75,785
 101,874
44,444
 23,841
Additions to software and equipment(6,869) (8,449)(1,370) (3,069)
Net cash used in investing activities(66,553) (63,714)(16,570) (31,258)
Cash flows from financing activities      
Proceeds from issuance of common stock related to public offering79,249
 
Proceeds from issuance of common stock related to employee equity plans3,105
 526
4,782
 2,392
Taxes paid related to net share settlement of equity awards(3,883) (694)(5,523) (3,503)
Repayments of term loan(1,125) (1,125)(375) (375)
Payments of debt modification costs(370) 

 (370)
Net cash used in financing activities(2,273) (1,293)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities78,133
 (1,856)
      
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents(27,048) (12,795)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents82,694
 (35,203)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period47,746
 57,317
19,196
 47,746
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period$20,698
 $44,522
$101,890
 $12,543
      
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information      
Interest paid$10,350
 $9,669
$3,072
 $3,314
Income taxes paid802
 

 170
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
NMI HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)


1. Organization, and Basis of Presentation and Summary of Accounting Principles
NMI Holdings, Inc. (NMIH) is a Delaware corporation, incorporated in May 2011, to provide private mortgage guaranty insurance (which we refer to as mortgage insurance or MI) through its wholly owned insurance subsidiaries, National Mortgage Insurance Corporation (NMIC) and National Mortgage Reinsurance Inc One (Re One).
In April 2012, we completed a private placement of our securities, through which we offered and sold an aggregate of 55,000,000 of our Class A common stock resulting in net proceeds of approximately $510 million (the Private Placement), and we completed the acquisition of our insurance subsidiaries for $8.5 million in cash, common stock and warrants, plus the assumption of $1.3 million in liabilities. In November 2013, we completed an initial public offering of 2.4 million shares of our common stock, and our common stock began trading on the NASDAQ exchange on November 8, 2013, under the symbol "NMIH." In March 2018, we completed the sale of an additional 4.3 million shares of common stock including a 15% option to purchase additional shares, which was exercised in full.
In April 2013, NMIC, our primary insurance subsidiary, issued its first mortgage insurance policy. NMIC is licensed to write mortgage insurance in all 50 states and D.C. In August 2015, NMIH capitalized a wholly owned subsidiary, NMI Services, Inc. (NMIS), through which we offer outsourced loan review services on a limited basis to mortgage loan originators.
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements, which include the results of NMIH and its wholly owned subsidiaries, have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q as prescribed by the SEC for interim reporting and include other information and disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. (GAAP). Our accounts are maintained in U.S. dollars. These statements should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2016,2017, included in our 20162017 10-K. All intercompany transactions have been eliminated. The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts of assets and liabilities, as well as disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the balance sheet date. Estimates also affect the reported amounts of income and expenses for the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The results of operations for the interim period may not be indicative of the results that may be expected for the full year ending December 31, 2017.2018.
Deferred Policy Acquisition CostsSignificant Accounting Principles
Costs directly associated with the successful acquisition of mortgage insurance policies, consisting of certain selling expenses and other policy issuance and underwriting expenses, are initially deferred and reported as deferred policy acquisition costs (DAC). DAC is reviewed periodically to determine that it does not exceed recoverable amounts and is adjusted as appropriate for policy cancellations to be consistent with our revenue recognition policy. We estimate the rate of amortization to reflect actual experience and anyThere have been no changes to persistency or loss development. For each book yearour significant accounting principles as described in Item 8, "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data - Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - Note 2 - Summary of business, these costs are amortized to expenseAccounting Principles" of our 2017 Form 10-K, other than as noted in proportion to estimated gross profits over the estimated life of the policies. Total amortization of DAC, net of a portion of ceding commission related to the 2016 QSR Transaction (see Note 5, "Reinsurance" and "Reinsurance"Recent Accounting Pronouncements - Adopted"), was $1.7 million and $1.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and $4.0 million and $3.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. below.
Premium Deficiency Reserves
We consider whether a premium deficiency exists at each fiscal quarter using best estimate assumptions as of the testing date. Per ASC 944, a premium deficiency reserve shall be recognized if the sum of expected claim costs and claim adjustment expenses, expected dividends to policyholders, unamortized acquisition costs and maintenance costs exceeds related unearned premiums and anticipated investment income. We have determined that no premium deficiency reserves were necessary for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 or 2016.
Reinsurance
We account for premiums, lossesclaims and lossclaim expenses that are ceded to reinsurers on basesa basis consistent with those we use to account for the original policies we issue and pursuant to the terms of our reinsurance contracts. We account for premiums ceded or otherwise paid to reinsurers as reductions to premium revenue.

Effective January 1, 2018, NMIC entered into a second quota share reinsurance transaction (2018 QSR Transaction) which is similar in nature to the quota share reinsurance transaction we entered into in September 2016 (2016 QSR Transaction, together with 2018 QSR Transaction, the QSR Transactions) (see Note 5, "Reinsurance"). We earn profit and ceding commissions in connection with our 2016the QSR Transaction (see Note 5, "Reinsurance").Transactions.  Profit commissions represent a percentage of the profits recognized by reinsurers that are returned to us, based on the level of lossesclaims and claim expenses that we cede. We recognize any profit commissions we earn as increases to premium revenue. Ceding commissions are calculated as a percentage of ceded written premiums which areunder the 2016 QSR Transaction and as a percentage of ceded earned premiums under the 2018 QSR Transaction, and we intended to cover our costs to acquire and service the direct policies. We earn the
NMI HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

ceding commissions in a manner consistent with our recognition of earnings on the underlying insurance policies, over the terms of the policies reinsured. We account for ceding commissions earned as reductionsa reduction to underwriting and operating expenses.
WeUnder the QSR Transactions, we cede a portion of lossclaims and claim expenses reserves paid losses and loss expenses to our reinsurers, which are accounted for as reinsurance recoverables in "Other Assets" on the consolidated balance sheets and as reductions to lossclaim expense on the consolidated statements of operations. We remain directly liable for all loss payments in the event we are unable to collect from any reinsurer.
Variable interest entity
NMI HOLDINGS, INC.
In May 2017, NMIC entered into a reinsurance agreement with Oaktown Re Ltd. (Oaktown Re), a Bermuda-domiciled special purpose reinsurer. At inception of the reinsurance agreement, we determined that Oaktown Re was a variable interest entity (VIE), as defined under GAAP (ASC 810), because it did not have sufficient equity at risk to finance its activities. We evaluated the VIE to determine whether NMIC was its primary beneficiary and, if so, whether we were required to consolidate the assets and liabilities of the VIE. The primary beneficiary of a VIE is an enterprise that (1) has the power to direct the activities of the VIE, which most significantly impact its economic performance and (2) has significant economic exposure to the VIE; i.e., the obligation to absorb losses or receive benefits that could potentially be significant. The determination of whether an entity is the primary beneficiary of a VIE is complex and requires management judgment regarding determinative factors, including the expected results of the VIE and how those results are absorbed by beneficial interest holders, as well as which party has the power to direct activities that most significantly impact the performance of the VIE.NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
We concluded that we are not the primary beneficiary of Oaktown Re and that consolidation is not required, as we do not have significant economic exposure in the entity.
See Note 5, "Reinsurance" for further discussion of the reinsurance arrangement.
Premiums Receivable
Premiums receivable consist of premiums due on our mortgage insurance policies. If a mortgage insurance premium is unpaid for more than 120 days, the receivable is written off against earned premium and the related insurance policy is canceled. We have determined that the receivable write-off was immaterial as of September 30, 2017.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements - Adopted
In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the FASB)(FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606). This update is intended to provide a consistent approach in recognizing revenue. In accordance withDecember 2016, the new standard,FASB clarified that all contracts that are within the scope of Topic 944, Financial Services-Insurance, are excluded from the scope of ASU 2014-09. Accordingly, this update did not impact the recognition of revenue occurs whenrelated to insurance premiums or investment income, which represent a customer obtains controlmajority of promised goods orour total revenues. The update impacted our loan review services revenue, which is the only revenue stream in anscope of the update. We adopted this update on January 1, 2018 using the modified-retrospective approach. For the period ended March 31, 2018, the impact was immaterial to our consolidated financial statements.
In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, Financial Instruments - Overall: Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (Subtopic 825-10). This update requires entities to reduce the carrying amount of deferred tax assets, if necessary, by the amount of any tax benefit that reflects the consideration to which the entity expectsis not expected to be entitled in exchangerealized. We adopted this update effective January 1, 2018. The impact was immaterial to our consolidated financial statements.
In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-08, Receivables - Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs (Subtopic 310-20). This update shortened the amortization period for those goods or services. In addition, the newpremium on certain purchased callable debt securities to the earliest call date. The standard requires that reporting companies disclose the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. In August 2015, ASU 2015-14 deferred the provisions of ASU 2014-09 to be effectivetook effect for interim and annual periodspublic business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. In addition, this guidance amends the existing requirements for the recognition of a gain or loss on the transfer of non-financial assets that are not in a contract with a customer (ASU 2017-05). In September 2017, ASU 2017-13, added guidance from an SEC Staff Announcement, "Transition Related to Accounting Standards Updates No. 2014-09." The adoption of this update for our loan review services revenue, effective January 1, 2018, will have an immaterialhad no impact on our consolidated financial statementsstatements.
In February 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-02, Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Topic 220). This update permits a company to reclassify the disproportionate income tax effects as a result of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the TCJA) on items within accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI) to retained earnings. This standard will not affecttake effect for public business entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted. We adopted this update on January 1, 2018 and adjusted the Company’s reportingdisproportionate income tax effects, or "stranded tax effects," resulting in a $0.3 million reduction to our beginning retained earnings as of insurance premiums and investment income. We are still in the process of evaluating the adoption method and the impact on presentation and disclosure.January 1, 2018.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements - Not Yet Adopted
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842). This update requires that businesses recognize rights and obligations associated with certain leases as assets and liabilities on the balance sheet. The standard also requires additional disclosures regarding the amount, timing, and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases. For public business entities, this update is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018 and interim periods therein. Early adoption is permitted in any period. We expect to adopt this guidance on January 1, 2019. In September 2017, ASU 2017-13, added guidance from an SEC Staff Announcement, "Transition Related to Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-02." We anticipate this standard will have an impact on our financial position, primarily due to our office space operating lease, as we will be required to recognize lease assets and lease liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet. We will continue to assess the potential impacts of this standard, including the impact the adoption of this guidance will have on our results of operations or cash flows.
In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326). This update requires companies to measure all expected credit losses for financial assets held at the reporting date. The standard also amends the accounting for credit losses on available-for-sale debt securities and purchased financial assets with credit deterioration also is amended in the standard.deterioration. The standard
NMI HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

will take effect for public business entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2019. We are currently evaluating the impact the adoption of this ASU will have, if any, on the consolidated financial statements.
In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230). This update is intended to reduce diversity in practice in how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows. The standard will take effect for public business entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2017. The adoption of this update, effective January 1, 2018, is not expected to have any impact on our statement of cash flows.
In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-16, Income Taxes- Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory (Topic 740). This update is intended to improve the accounting for the income tax consequences of intra-entity transfers of assets other than inventory. The standard will take effect for public business entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2017. The adoption of this update, effective January 1, 2018, is not expected to have any impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350). This update is intended to simplify the test for goodwill impairment. The standard will take effect for public business entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, after December 15, 2020. Early adoption is permitted for interim or annual goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017. We have determined that the adoption of this ASU will have no impact on the consolidated financial statements.
In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-08, Receivables - Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs (Subtopic 310-20). This update shortens the amortization period for the premium on certain purchased callable debt securities to the earliest call date. The standard will take effect for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted, and if an entity early adopts the guidance in an interim period, any adjustments are reflected as of the beginning of the fiscal year that includes that interim period. The adoption of this update, effective January 1, 2018, is not expected to have any impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In July 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-11, Earnings Per Share (Topic 260), Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity (Topic 480), and Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815). This update is intended to simplify the accounting for certain equity-linked financial instruments with down round features.instruments. This standard will take effect for public business entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted in any interimpermitted. The guidance must be applied using a full or annual period. The Company ismodified retrospective approach. We are currently evaluating the impact the adoption of this ASU will have, if any, on theour consolidated financial statements.
Immaterial Correction of Prior Period Amounts
During the first quarter of 2017, after filing the 2016 10-K, including the audited financial statements included therein, we discovered that $1.8 million of deferred taxes on vested options associated with employees terminated in previous years had not been reversed. Because our deferred tax asset (DTA) was subject to a valuation allowance prior to December 31, 2016, no expense would have been recognized in periods prior to December 31, 2016. However, at December 31, 2016, when we released the valuation allowance against the DTA, the DTA was overstated by $1.8 million and resulted in a $1.8 million overstatement of our 2016 income tax benefit and net income.
In order to provide consistency in the consolidated statements and as permitted by Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) 108, revisions for these immaterial amounts to previously reported annual amounts are reflected in the Consolidated Balance Sheet financial information herein and will be reflected in the Consolidated Statement of Operations in future filings containing such financial information as permitted by SAB 108. A comparison of the affected amounts as previously reported and as adjusted are presented below.
NMI HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

As of and for the full year ended December 31, 2016As previously reported As adjusted
 (In thousands)
Income Statement   
Net income$65,841
 $64,001
Income tax (benefit)(54,389) (52,550)
Basic EPS1.11
 1.08
Diluted EPS1.08
 1.05
    
Balance Sheet   
Deferred tax asset, net$53,274
 $51,434
Total assets841,737
 839,897
Accumulated deficit(94,882) (96,722)
Total shareholders' equity477,349
 475,509
Change in Accounting Principle
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting (Topic 718), which intends to simplify various aspects of the accounting for and reporting of share-based payments. The new accounting is required to be adopted using a modified retrospective approach, with a cumulative-effect adjustment to opening retained earnings for any outstanding liability awards that qualify for equity classification under the new guidance.
As the guidance is effective for annual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, we adopted the new guidance in the first quarter of 2017. This required us to reflect any adjustments as of January 1, 2017, the beginning of the annual period that includes the interim period of adoption. The primary impact of adoption was the recognition of excess tax benefits in our provision for income taxes in the consolidated statements of operations. Additionally, our consolidated statements of cash flows now present excess tax benefits as an operating activity on a prospective basis. Finally, we have elected to account for forfeitures as they occur, rather than estimate expected forfeitures. The net cumulative effect of this change was recognized as a $0.5 million reduction to the accumulated deficit as of January 1, 2017.
2. Investments
We have designated our investment portfolio as available-for-sale and report it at fair value. The related unrealized gains and losses are, after considering the related tax expense or benefit, recognized through comprehensive income and loss, and on an accumulated basis in shareholders' equity. Net realized investment gains and losses are reported in income based upon specific identification of securities sold.
Fair Values and Gross Unrealized Gains and Losses on Investments
 Amortized
Cost
 Gross Unrealized Fair
Value
  Gains Losses 
As of September 30, 2017(In Thousands)
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. government agencies$65,669
 $21
 $(636) $65,054
Municipal debt securities90,155
 929
 (348) 90,736
Corporate debt securities404,467
 5,619
 (1,246) 408,840
Asset-backed securities96,279
 1,142
 (101) 97,320
Total bonds656,570
 7,711
 (2,331) 661,950
Short-term investments30,714
 65
 
 30,779
Total investments$687,284
 $7,776
 $(2,331) $692,729
NMI HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

Fair Values and Gross Unrealized Gains and Losses on Investments
Amortized
Cost
 Gross Unrealized Fair
Value
Amortized
Cost
 Gross Unrealized Fair
Value
 Gains Losses  Gains Losses 
As of December 31, 2016(In Thousands)
As of March 31, 2018(In Thousands)
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. government agencies$64,135
 $6
 $(962) $63,179
$57,018
 $
 $(1,807) $55,211
Municipal debt securities40,801
 131
 (663) 40,269
89,792
 155
 (1,259) 88,688
Corporate debt securities349,712
 1,722
 (2,356) 349,078
453,262
 806
 (6,883) 447,185
Asset-backed securities114,456
 765
 (560) 114,661
125,030
 357
 (736) 124,651
Total bonds569,104
 2,624
 (4,541) 567,187
725,102
 1,318
 (10,685) 715,735
Long-term investments - other353
 
 
 353
Short-term investments61,584
 198
 
 61,782
7,698
 4
 
 7,702
Total investments$630,688
 $2,822
 $(4,541) $628,969
$733,153
 $1,322
 $(10,685) $723,790
 Amortized
Cost
 Gross Unrealized Fair
Value
  Gains Losses 
As of December 31, 2017(In Thousands)
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. government agencies$65,669
 $
 $(981) $64,688
Municipal debt securities89,973
 534
 (659) 89,848
Corporate debt securities435,562
 4,231
 (1,958) 437,835
Asset-backed securities100,153
 916
 (125) 100,944
Total bonds691,357
 5,681
 (3,723) 693,315
Long-term investments - other353
 
 
 353
Short-term investments22,149
 58
 
 22,207
Total investments$713,859
 $5,739
 $(3,723) $715,875
As of September 30, 2017March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2016,2017, approximately $7.0 million of our cash and investments were held in the form of U.S. Treasury securities on deposit with various state insurance departments to satisfy regulatory requirements.
Scheduled Maturities
The amortized cost and fair values of available-for-sale securities as of September 30, 2017March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2016,2017, by contractual maturity, are shown below. Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because issuers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties. Because most asset-backed securities provide for periodic payments throughout their lives, they are listed below in a separate category.
As of September 30, 2017Amortized
Cost
 Fair
Value
 (In Thousands)
Due in one year or less$108,020
 $108,048
Due after one through five years158,353
 159,502
Due after five through ten years309,708
 312,697
Due after ten years14,924
 15,162
Asset-backed securities96,279
 97,320
Total investments$687,284
 $692,729
As of December 31, 2016Amortized
Cost
 Fair
Value
As of March 31, 2018Amortized
Cost
 Fair
Value
(In Thousands)(In Thousands)
Due in one year or less$94,382
 $94,584
$59,804
 $59,705
Due after one through five years173,296
 173,251
252,066
 249,638
Due after five through ten years242,005
 240,060
287,110
 280,837
Due after ten years6,549
 6,413
9,143
 8,959
Asset-backed securities114,456
 114,661
125,030
 124,651
Total investments$630,688
 $628,969
$733,153
 $723,790
NMI HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

As of December 31, 2017Amortized
Cost
 Fair
Value
 (In Thousands)
Due in one year or less$97,406
 $97,394
Due after one through five years195,795
 195,626
Due after five through ten years305,798
 306,930
Due after ten years14,707
 14,981
Asset-backed securities100,153
 100,944
Total investments$713,859
 $715,875
Aging of Unrealized Losses
As of September 30, 2017March 31, 2018, the investment portfolio had gross unrealized losses of $2.310.7 million, $1.5$3.5 million of which has been in an unrealized loss position for a period of 12 months or greater. We did not consider these securities to be other-than-temporarily impaired as of September 30, 2017.March 31, 2018. We based our conclusion that these investments were not other-than-temporarily impaired as of September 30, 2017March 31, 2018 on the following facts: (i) the unrealized losses were primarily caused by interest rate movements since the purchase date; (ii) we do not intend to sell these investments; and (iii) we do not believe that it is more likely than not that we will be required to sell these investments before recovery of our amortized cost basis, which may not occur until maturity. For those securities in an unrealized loss position, the length of time the securities were in such a position is as follows:
NMI HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

 Less Than 12 Months 12 Months or Greater Total
 # of SecuritiesFair ValueUnrealized Losses # of SecuritiesFair ValueUnrealized Losses # of SecuritiesFair ValueUnrealized Losses
As of March 31, 2018 (Dollars in Thousands)
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. government agencies12
$26,792
$(994) 23
$24,960
$(813) 35
$51,752
$(1,807)
Municipal debt securities27
54,924
(691) 10
17,772
(568) 37
72,696
(1,259)
Corporate debt securities180
302,287
(5,000) 18
42,745
(1,883) 198
345,032
(6,883)
Asset-backed securities39
74,208
(497) 4
9,261
(239) 43
83,469
(736)
Short-term investments1
995

 


 1
995

Total259
$459,206
$(7,182) 55
$94,738
$(3,503) 314
$553,944
$(10,685)
 Less Than 12 Months 12 Months or Greater Total
 # of SecuritiesFair ValueUnrealized Losses # of SecuritiesFair ValueUnrealized Losses # of SecuritiesFair ValueUnrealized Losses
As of September 30, 2017 (Dollars in Thousands)
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. government agencies22
$38,425
$(263) 15
$19,621
$(373) 37
$58,046
$(636)
Municipal debt securities9
21,567
(212) 8
10,319
(136) 17
31,886
(348)
Corporate debt securities44
69,602
(317) 14
34,031
(929) 58
103,633
(1,246)
Asset-backed securities15
21,173
(89) 2
4,988
(12) 17
26,161
(101)
Total90
$150,767
$(881) 39
$68,959
$(1,450) 129
$219,726
$(2,331)
Less Than 12 Months 12 Months or Greater TotalLess Than 12 Months 12 Months or Greater Total
# of SecuritiesFair ValueUnrealized Losses # of SecuritiesFair ValueUnrealized Losses # of SecuritiesFair ValueUnrealized Losses# of SecuritiesFair ValueUnrealized Losses # of SecuritiesFair ValueUnrealized Losses # of SecuritiesFair ValueUnrealized Losses
As of December 31, 2016 (Dollars in Thousands)
As of December 31, 2017 (Dollars in Thousands)
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. government agencies33
$51,093
$(962) 
$
$
 33
$51,093
$(962)16
$29,806
$(394) 26
$34,882
$(587) 42
$64,688
$(981)
Municipal debt securities14
28,659
(617) 1
1,704
(46) 15
30,363
(663)21
38,628
(264) 10
17,945
(395) 31
56,573
(659)
Corporate debt securities77
135,115
(1,955) 8
13,873
(401) 85
148,988
(2,356)94
128,313
(829) 23
48,978
(1,129) 117
177,291
(1,958)
Asset-backed securities30
38,702
(510) 6
2,472
(50) 36
41,174
(560)22
27,947
(63) 5
12,438
(62) 27
40,385
(125)
Total154
$253,569
$(4,044) 15
$18,049
$(497) 169
$271,618
$(4,541)153
$224,694
$(1,550) 64
$114,243
$(2,173) 217
$338,937
$(3,723)
The following table presents the components of net investment income:
For the three months ended September 30, For the nine months ended September 30,For the three months ended March 31, 
2017 2016 2017 20162018 2017 
(In Thousands)(In Thousands)
Investment income$4,363
 $3,727
 $12,455
 $10,672
$4,782
 $3,993
 
Investment expenses(193) (183) (570) (555)(208) (186) 
Net investment income$4,170
 $3,544
 $11,885
 $10,117
$4,574
 $3,807
 
NMI HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

The following table presents the components of net realized investment gains (losses):
For the three months ended September 30, For the nine months ended September 30,For the three months ended March 31, 
2017 2016 2017 20162018 2017 
(In Thousands)(In Thousands)
Gross realized investment gains$69
 $66
 $536
 $683
$
 $279
 
Gross realized investment losses
 
 (338) (1,441)
 (337) 
Net realized investment gains (losses)$69
 $66
 $198
 $(758)$
 $(58) 
Investment Securities - Other-than-Temporary Impairment (OTTI)
For the quarter ended September 30, 2017,March 31, 2018, we held no other-than-temporarily impaired securities. There were no credit losses recognized in earnings for which a portion of an OTTI loss was recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss).income. For the quarter ended March 31, 2017, we recognized OTTI losses in earnings of $144 thousand related to a single security with an unfavorable recovery forecast. The impaired security was liquidated in the second quarter of 2017.
NMI HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

3. Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The following describes the valuation techniques used by us to determine the fair value of our financial instruments:
We established a fair value hierarchy by prioritizing the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy under this standard are described below:
Level 1 - Fair value measurements based on quoted prices in active markets that we have the ability to access for identical assets or liabilities. Market price data generally is obtained from exchange or dealer markets. We do not adjust the quoted price for such instruments.
Level 2 - Fair value measurements based on inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, and inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, such as interest rates and yield curves that are observable at commonly quoted intervals.
Level 3 - Fair value measurements based on valuation techniques that use significant inputs that are unobservable. Both observable and unobservable inputs may be used to determine the fair values of positions classified in Level 3. The circumstances for using these measurements include those in which there is little, if any, market activity for the asset or liability. Therefore, we must make certain assumptions, which require significant management judgment or estimation about the inputs a hypothetical market participant would use to value that asset or liability.
In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement in its entirety falls is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety.
Assets classified as Level 1 and Level 2
To determine the fair value of securities available-for-sale in Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, independent pricing sources have been utilized. One price is provided per security based on observable market data. To ensure securities are appropriately classified in the fair value hierarchy, we review the pricing techniques and methodologies of the independent pricing sources and believe that their policies adequately consider market activity, either based on specific transactions for the issue valued or based on modeling of securities with similar credit quality, duration, yield and structure that were recently traded. A variety of inputs are utilized by the independent pricing sources including benchmark yields, reported trades, non-binding broker/dealer quotes, issuer spreads, two sided markets, benchmark securities, bids, offers and reference data including data published in market research publications. Inputs may be weighted differently for any security, and not all inputs are used for each security evaluation. Market indicators, industry and economic events are also considered. This information is evaluated using a multidimensional pricing model. Quality controls are performed by the independent pricing sources throughout this process, which include reviewing tolerance reports, trading information and data changes, and directional moves compared to market moves. This model combines all inputs to arrive at a value assigned to each security. We have not made any adjustments to the prices obtained from the independent pricing sources. There were no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy during the quarter ended September 30, 2017.
NMI HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

Liabilities classified as Level 3
We calculate the fair value of outstanding warrants utilizing levelLevel 3 inputs, including a Black-Scholes option-pricing model, in combination with a binomial model, and we value the pricing protection features within the warrants using a Monte-Carlo simulation model. Variables in the model include the risk-free rate of return, dividend yield, expected life and expected volatility of our stock price.
NMI HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

The following tables present the level within the fair value hierarchy at which the Company’sour financial instruments were measured: 
Fair Value Measurements Using  Fair Value Measurements Using  
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
 Significant Other
Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
 Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
 Fair ValueQuoted Prices in
Active Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
 Significant Other
Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
 Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
 Fair Value
As of September 30, 2017(In Thousands)
As of March 31, 2018(In Thousands)
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. government agencies$60,214
 $4,840
 $
 $65,054
$55,211
 $
 $
 $55,211
Municipal debt securities
 90,736
 
 90,736

 88,688
 
 88,688
Corporate debt securities
 408,840
 
 408,840

 447,185
 
 447,185
Asset-backed securities
 97,320
 
 97,320

 124,651
 
 124,651
Long-term investment – other353
 
 
 353
Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments51,477
 
 
 51,477
109,592
 
 
 109,592
Total assets$111,691
 $601,736
 $
 $713,427
$165,156
 $660,524
 $
 $825,680
       
Warrant liability
 
 4,046
 4,046

 
 6,563
 6,563
Total liabilities$
 $
 $4,046
 $4,046
$
 $
 $6,563
 $6,563
Fair Value Measurements Using  Fair Value Measurements Using  
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
 Significant Other
Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
 Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
 Fair ValueQuoted Prices in
Active Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
 Significant Other
Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
 Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
 Fair Value
As of December 31, 2016(In Thousands)
As of December 31, 2017(In Thousands)
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. government agencies$50,719
 $12,460
 $
 $63,179
$59,844
 $4,844
 $
 $64,688
Municipal debt securities
 40,269
 
 40,269

 89,848
 
 89,848
Corporate debt securities
 349,078
 
 349,078

 437,835
 
 437,835
Asset-backed securities
 114,661
 
 114,661

 100,944
 
 100,944
Long-term investment - other353
 
 
 353
Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments109,528
 
 
 109,528
41,403
 
 
 41,403
Total assets$160,247
 $516,468
 $
 $676,715
$101,600
 $633,471
 $
 $735,071
       
Warrant liability
 
 3,367
 3,367

 
 7,472
 7,472
Total liabilities$
 $
 $3,367
 $3,367
$
 $
 $7,472
 $7,472
There were no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2, nor any transfers in or out of Level 3, of the fair value hierarchy during the ninethree months ended September 30, 2017March 31, 2018 and the year-endyear ended December 31, 2016.2017.
NMI HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

The following is a roll-forward of Level 3 liabilities measured at fair value:
For the nine months ended September 30,For the three months ended March 31,
Warrant Liability2017 20162018 2017
(In Thousands)(In Thousands)
Balance, January 1$3,367
 $1,467
$7,472
 $3,367
Change in fair value of warrant liability included in earnings679
 187
(420) 196
Balance, September 30$4,046
 $1,654
Issuance of common stock on warrant exercise(489) 
Balance, March 31$6,563
 $3,563
We revalueThe following table outlines the warrant liability quarterly using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model, in combination with a binomial model,key inputs and we value the pricing protection features within the warrants using a Monte-Carlo simulation model. As of September 30, 2017, the assumptions used in the Black-Scholes option-pricing model were as follows: aof the dates indicated.
 As of March 31,
 2018 2017 
Common Stock Price$16.55
 $11.40
 
Risk free interest rate2.37%
 1.70%
 
Expected life2.59 years
 3.92 years
 
Expected volatility30.1%
 30.5%
 
Dividend yield0%
 0%
 
The changes in fair value of the warrant liability for the quarters ended March 31, 2018 and 2017 are primarily attributable to changes in the price of our common stock price asduring the respective periods, with additional impact related to changes in the Black-Scholes model inputs and exercises of September 30, 2017 ofoutstanding warrants.
NMI HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

$12.40, risk free interest rate of 1.66%, expected life of 3.25 years, expected volatility of 30.6% and a dividend yield of 0%. The change in fair value is primarily attributable to an increase in the price of our common stock from December 31, 2016 to September 30, 2017.
4. Term Loan
On November 10, 2015, we entered into a credit agreement (the Credit Agreement) to obtain a $150 million three-year senior secured term loan (the Term Loan) for $150 million.. On February 10, 2017, we entered into an amendment toamended the Credit Agreement (Amendment No. 1) to reduce the interest rate and extend the maturity date of the Term Loan from November 10, 2018 to November 10, 2019. On October 25, 2017, we further amended the Credit Agreement (Amendment No. 2) to remove a covenant that required NMIH to maintain liquidity (as defined therein) in an aggregate amount no less than all remaining interest payments due under the Term Loan. As modified by one year and reduceAmendment No. 2, the interest rate. BasedCredit Agreement retains a requirement that NMIH maintain liquidity in an aggregate amount no less than the sum of all remaining principal amortization payments due under the Term Loan, excluding principal scheduled to be paid on our analysis, we concluded the amendmentits maturity date. The amendments to the Credit Agreement should behave been treated as a modification. modifications.
As of September 30, 2017,March 31, 2018, the Term Loan bears interest at the Eurodollar Rate, as defined in the Credit Agreement and subject to a 1.00% floor, plus an annual margin rate of 6.75% (an, representing an all-in rate of 7.99% as of September 30, 2017)8.54%, payable monthly or quarterly based on our interest rate election. Quarterly principal payments of $375 thousand are also required. The outstanding balance of the Term Loan as of September 30, 2017March 31, 2018 was $147$146.3 million.
DebtInterest expense for the Term Loan includes interest and amortization of issuance costs, modification costs and the original issue discount. Original debt issuance costs totaling $4.8$4.9 million, including $370$445 thousand related to the modificationAmendment No.1 and Amendment No.2 modifications and a 1% original issue discount, are being amortized to interest expense, using the effective interest method, over the contractual life of the Term Loan. Effective interest rate forAs of March 31, 2018, the Term Loan includes interest, amortization ofremaining unamortized issuance cost and the discount. For the nine months ended September 30, 2017, we recorded $10.1 million of interest expense, including amortization of the issuance andcosts, modification costs and original issue discount.discount totaled $2.4 million. For the three months ended March 31, 2018, we recorded $3.4 million of interest expense.
We are subject to certain quarterlyvarious covenants under the amended Credit Agreement. These covenantsAgreement, which include, but are not limited to the following: a maximum debt-to-total capitalization ratio (as defined therein) of 35%, maximum risk-to-capital (RTC) ratio of 22.0:1.0, minimum liquidity (as defined therein), of $2.3 million as of March 31, 2018, compliance with the PMIERs financial requirements (subject to any GSE-approved waivers), and minimum shareholders' equity requirements. This description is not intended to be complete in all respects and is qualified in its entirety by the terms of the amended Credit Agreement, including its covenants and events of default. We were in compliance with all covenants as of September 30, 2017.March 31, 2018.
Future principal payments due underfor the Term Loan as of September 30, 2017March 31, 2018 are as follows:
As of September 30, 2017 Principal
As of March 31, 2018 Principal 
 (In thousands) (In thousands) 
2017 $375
2018 1,500
 1,125
 
2019 145,125
 145,125
 
Total $147,000
 $146,250
 
     

NMI HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

5. Reinsurance
We have enteredenter into two third-party reinsurance transactions to actively manage our risk, ensure PMIERs compliance and support the growth of our business. The GSEs and the Wisconsin Office of the Commissioner of Insurance (Wisconsin OCI) have approved bothall such transactions (subject to certain conditions and their periodicongoing review, of the transactions, including levels of approved capital credit).

The effect of our reinsurance agreements on premiums written and earned is as follows:
For the three months endedFor the nine months endedFor the three months ended
September 30, 2017 September 30, 2016September 30, 2017 September 30, 2016March 31, 2018 March 31, 2017
(In Thousands)(In Thousands)
Net premiums written        
Direct$56,217
 $46,535
$142,134
 $133,526
$66,027
 $39,245
Ceded (1)
(8,501) (37,336)(20,029) (37,336)(6,997) (4,641)
Net premiums written$47,716
 $9,199
$122,105
 $96,190
$59,030
 $34,604
        
Net premiums earned        
Direct$52,024
 $33,052
$133,696
 $78,900
$63,604
 $37,438
Ceded (1)
(7,505) (1,244)(18,035) (1,244)(8,690) (4,213)
Net premiums earned$44,519
 $31,808
$115,661
 $77,656
$54,914
 $33,225
(1) Net of profit commission
Excess-of-loss reinsurance
In May 2017, NMIC entered into a reinsurance agreement with Oaktown Re Ltd. (Oaktown Re) that provides for up to $211.3 million of aggregate excess-of-loss reinsurance coverage at inception for new delinquencies on an existing portfolio of mortgage insurance policies written from 2013 through December 31, 2016. For the reinsurance coverage period, NMIC will retain the first layer of $126.8 million of aggregate losses and Oaktown Re will then provide second layer coverage up to the outstanding reinsurance coverage amount. NMIC will then retain losses in excess of the outstanding reinsurance coverage amount. The outstanding reinsurance coverage amount decreases from $211.3 million at inception over a ten-year period as the underlying covered mortgages amortize and/or are repaid and was $185$166.6 million as of September 30, 2017.March 31, 2018. The outstanding reinsurance coverage amount will stop amortizing if certain credit enhancement or delinquency thresholds are triggered.
Oaktown Re financed the coverage by issuing mortgage insurance-linked notes in an aggregate amount of $211.3 million to unaffiliated investors (the Notes). The Notes mature on April 26, 2027. All of the proceeds paid to Oaktown Re from the sale of the Notes were deposited into a reinsurance trust to collateralize and fund the obligations of Oaktown Re to NMIC under the reinsurance agreement. At all times, funds in the reinsurance trust account are required to be invested in high credit quality money market funds.  We refer collectively to NMIC’sNMIC's reinsurance agreement with Oaktown Re and the issuance of the Notes by Oaktown Re as the 2017 ILN Transaction. Under the terms of the 2017 ILN Transaction, NMIC makes risk premium payments for the applicable outstanding reinsurance coverage amount and pays Oaktown Re for anticipated operating expenses (capped at $300 thousand per year). For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017,March 31, 2018, NMIC paid risk premiums of $1.9 million and $3.3 million, respectively.$1.6 million. NMIC did not cede any losses to Oaktown Re.
Under the reinsurance agreement, NMIC holds an optional termination right if certain events occur, including, among others, aftera clean-up call if the outstanding reinsurance coverage amount amortizes to 10% or less of the reinsurance coverage amount at inception or if NMIC reasonably determines that changes to GSE or rating agency asset requirements would cause a material and adverse effect on the capital treatment adopted by NMIC.afforded to NMIC under the agreement. In addition, there are certain events that will result in mandatory termination of the agreement, including NMIC’sNMIC's failure to pay premiums or consent to reductions in the trust account to make principal payments to noteholders, among others.
At the time the 2017 ILN Transaction was entered into with Oaktown Re, we evaluated the applicability of the accounting guidance that addresses VIEs. As a result of the evaluation of the 2017 ILN Transaction, we concluded that Oaktown Re is a VIE. However, given that NMIC does not have significant economic exposure in Oaktown Re, we do not consolidate Oaktown Re in our consolidated financial statements.
NMI HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

Quota share reinsurance
In2016 QSR Transaction
Effective September 1, 2016, NMIC entered into a quota-share reinsurance transactionthe 2016 QSR Transaction with a panel of third-party reinsurers (2016 QSR Transaction).reinsurers. Each of the third-party reinsurers has an insurer financial strength rating of A- or better by Standard and Poor’s Rating Services (S&P), A.M. Best or both.
Under the 2016 QSR Transaction, effective September 1, 2016, NMIC ceded premiums written related to:
25% of existing risk written on eligible policies as of August 31, 2016;
100% of existing risk under our pool agreement with Fannie Mae; and
25% of risk on eligible policies written from September 1, 2016 through December 31, 2017.
The 2016 QSR Transaction is scheduled to terminate on December 31, 2027, except with respect to the ceded pool risk, which is scheduled to terminate on August 31, 2023. However, NMIC has the option, based on certain conditions and subject to a termination fee, to terminate the agreement as of December 31, 2020, or at the end of any calendar quarter thereafter, which would result in NMIC reassuming the related risk.
2018 QSR Transaction
Effective January 1, 2018, NMIC entered into the 2018 QSR Transaction with a panel of third-party reinsurers. Each of the third-party reinsurers has an insurer financial strength rating of A- or better by S&P, A.M. Best or both. Under the 2018 QSR Transaction, NMIC cedes premiums earned related to 25% of risk on eligible policies written from January 1, 2018 through December 31, 2019.
The 2018 QSR Transaction is scheduled to terminate on December 31, 2029. However, NMIC has the option, based on certain conditions and subject to a termination fee, to terminate the agreement as of December 31, 2022, or at the end of any calendar quarter thereafter, which would result in NMIC reassuming the related risk.
The following table shows the amounts related to the 2016 QSR Transaction:Transactions:
For the three months endedFor the nine months endedFor the three months ended
September 30, 2017September 30, 2016September 30, 2017 September 30, 2016March 31, 2018 March 31, 2017
(In Thousands)(In Thousands)
Ceded risk-in-force$2,682,982
$1,778,235
$2,682,982
 $1,778,235
$3,304,335
 $2,167,745
Ceded premiums written(1)(14,389)(38,977)(36,715) (38,977)(14,525) (10,292)
Ceded premiums earned(1)(13,393)(2,885)(34,721) (2,885)(16,218) (9,865)
Ceded claims and claims expenses277
90
887
 90
543
 268
Ceding commission written2,878
7,795
7,343
 7,795
2,905
 2,058
Ceding commission earned2,581
551
6,921
 551
3,151
 2,065
Profit commission7,758
1,641
19,945
 1,641
9,201
 5,651
(1) The presentation of these line items was enhanced starting in the second quarter of 2017, to separately disclose "Profit commission." Prior to the second quarter of 2017, "Profit commission" was netted within both the "Ceded premium written" and "Ceded premium earned" lines.
Ceded premiums written under the 2016 QSR Transaction are recorded on the balance sheet as prepaid reinsurance premiums and amortized to ceded premiums earned in a manner consistent with the recognition of income on direct premiums. Under the 2018 QSR Transaction, premiums are ceded on an earned basis as defined in the agreement. NMIC receives a 20% ceding commission for premiums ceded pursuant to this transaction.under the QSR Transactions. NMIC also receives a profit commission, provided that the loss ratio on the loans covered under the agreement2016 QSR Transaction and 2018 QSR Transaction generally remains below 60% and 61%, respectively, as measured annually. Ceded claims and claimsclaim expenses under the QSR Transactions reduce NMIC's profit commission on a dollar-for-dollar basis.
NMI HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

In accordance with the terms of the 2016 QSR Transaction, rather than making a cash payment or transferring investments for ceded premiums written, NMIC established a funds withheld liability, which also includes amounts due to NMIC for ceding and profit commissions. Any loss recoveries and any potential profit commission to NMIC will be realized from this account until exhausted. NMIC's reinsurance recoverable balance is further supported by trust accounts established and maintained by each reinsurer in accordance with the PMIERs funding requirements for risk ceded to non-affiliates. The reinsurance recoverable on loss reserves related to our 2016 QSR Transaction was $1.2$2.3 million as of September 30, 2017.March 31, 2018.
The agreementIn accordance with the terms of the 2018 QSR Transaction, cash payments for ceded premiums earned are settled on a quarterly basis, offset by amounts due to NMIC for ceding and profit commissions. Any loss recoveries and any potential profit commission to NMIC will also settle quarterly. NMIC's reinsurance recoverable balance is scheduledfurther supported by trust accounts established and maintained by each reinsurer in accordance with the PMIERs funding requirements for risk ceded to terminatenon-affiliates. NMIC did not have any reinsurance recoverable on December 31, 2027, except with respectloss reserves related to the ceded pool risk, which is scheduled to terminate on August 31, 2023. However, NMIC has the option, based on certain conditions and subject to a termination fee, to terminate the agreementour 2018 QSR Transaction as of DecemberMarch 31, 2020, or at the end of any calendar quarter thereafter, which would result in NMIC reassuming the related risk.2018.
6. Reserves for Insurance Claims and ClaimsClaim Expenses
We establish reserves to recognize the estimated liability for insurance claims and claim expenses related to defaults on insured mortgage loans. Our method, consistentConsistent with industry practice, is towe establish reserves only for loans that have been reported to us by servicers as having been in default for at least 60 days. Ourdays, referred to as case reserves, also include amounts for estimated claims incurredand additional loans that we estimate (based on loans thatactuarial review) have been in default for at least 60 days that have not yet been reported to us by the servicers, often referred to as IBNR.incurred but not reported (IBNR) reserves. We also establish claims expense reserves, which represent the estimated cost of the claim administration process, including legal and other fees, as well as other general expenses of administering the claims settlement process. As of September 30, 2017,March 31, 2018, we had reserves for insurance claims and claims expenses of $6.1$10.4 million for 3501,000 primary loans in default. During the first ninethree months of 2017,2018, we paid 1617 claims totaling $731$482 thousand, including two14 claims totaling $11 thousand covered under the 2016 QSR Transaction.Transactions representing $111 thousand of ceded claims and claims expenses.
In 2013, we entered into a pool insurance transaction with Fannie Mae. The pool transaction includes a deductible, which represents the amount of claims to be absorbed by Fannie Mae before we are obligated to pay any claims. We only establish reserves for pool risk if we expect claims to exceed the deductible under the pool agreement, which represents the amount of claims absorbed by Fannie Mae before we are obligated to pay any claims.this deductible. At September 30, 2017, 46March 31, 2018, 64 loans in the pool were past due by 60 days or more. These 4664 loans
NMI HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

represent approximately $3.0$4.2 million of risk-in-force (RIF). Due to the size of the remaining deductible, of $10.0 million, the low level of notices of default (NODs) reported on loans in the pool through September 30, 2017March 31, 2018 and the expected severity (all loans in the pool have loan-to-value ratios (LTVs)(LTV) ratios under 80%), we did not have not established any poolcase or IBNR reserves for claimspool risks at March 31, 2018 or IBNR for the three and nine months endedSeptember 30, 2017 and 2016.March 31, 2017. In connection with the settlement of pool claims, we applied $368$492 thousand to the pool deductible through September 30, 2017.March 31, 2018. At March 31, 2018, the remaining pool deductible was $9.9 million. We have not paid any pool claims to date. 100% of our pool RIF is reinsured under the 2016 QSR Transaction.
NMI HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

The following table provides a reconciliation of the beginning and ending reserve balances for primary insurance claims and claimsclaim expenses:
For the nine months ended September 30,For the three months ended March 31,
2017 20162018 2017
(In Thousands)(In Thousands)
Beginning balance$3,001
 $679
$8,761
 $3,001
Less reinsurance recoverables (1)
(297) 
(1,902) (297)
Beginning balance, net of reinsurance recoverables2,704
 679
6,859
 2,704
      
Add claims incurred:      
Claims and claim expenses incurred:      
Current year (2)
3,546
 1,803
1,940
 955
Prior years (3)
(581) (214)(371) (320)
Total claims and claims expenses incurred2,965
 1,589
1,569
 635
      
Less claims paid:      
Claims and claim expenses paid:      
Current year (2)

 

 
Prior years (3)
720
 225
371
 142
Total claims and claim expenses paid720
 225
371
 142
      
Reserve at end of period, net of reinsurance recoverables4,949
 2,043
8,057
 3,197
Add reinsurance recoverables (1)
1,174
 90
2,334
 564
Ending balance$6,123
 $2,133
$10,391
 $3,761
(1) Related to ceded losses recoverable on the 2016 QSR Transaction,Transactions, included in "Other Assets" on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. See Note 5, "Reinsurance" for additional information.
(2) Related to insured loans with their most recent defaults occurring in the current year. For example, if a loan had defaulted in a prior year and subsequently cured and later re-defaulted in the current year, that default would be included in the current year.
(3) Related to insured loans with defaults occurring in prior years, which have been continuously in default since that time.
The "claims incurred" section of the table above shows claims and claim expenses incurred on NODs for current and prior years, including IBNR reserves. The amount of claims incurred relating to current year NODs represents the estimated amount of claims and claims expenses to be ultimately paid on such loans in default.  We recognized $581$371 thousand and $214$320 thousand of favorable prior year development during the ninethree months ended September 30,March 31, 2018 and 2017, and 2016, respectively, due to NOD cures and ongoing analysis of recent loss development trends. We may increase or decrease our original estimates as we learn additional information about individual defaults and claims and continue to observe and analyze loss development trends in our portfolio. ReservesGross reserves of $1.7$7.2 million related to prior year defaults remained as of September 30, 2017.March 31, 2018.
7. Earnings per Share

(EPS)
Basic earnings per share is based on the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding, while diluted earnings per share is based on the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding and common stock equivalents that would be issuable upon the vesting of service based RSUs, and exercise of vested and unvested stock options other share-based compensation arrangements, and the dilutive effect of
NMI HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

outstanding warrants. The following table reconciles the net income and the weighted average shares of common stock outstanding used in the computations of basic and diluted earnings per share of common stock:
NMI HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

For the three months ended September 30, For the nine months ended September 30,For the three months ended March 31, 
2017 2016 2017 20162018 2017 

(In Thousands, except for per share data)(In Thousands, except for per share data) 
Net income$12,312
 $6,175
 $23,816
 $4,279
       
Basic net income$22,355
 $5,492
 
Basic weighted average shares outstanding62,099
 59,184
 
Basic earnings per share$0.21
 $0.10
 $0.40
 $0.07
$0.36
 $0.09
 
           
Basic net income$22,355
 $5,492
 
Warrant gain, net of tax$(332) $
 
Diluted net income$22,023
 $5,492
 
    
Basic weighted average shares outstanding59,883,629
 59,130,401
 59,680,166
 59,047,758
62,099
 59,184
 
Dilutive effect of non-vested shares and warrants3,205,329
 1,154,345
 3,093,167
 814,158
Dilutive weighted average shares outstanding63,088,958
 60,284,746
 62,773,333
 59,861,916
Dilutive effect of issuable shares3,598
 3,155
 
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding65,697
 62,339
 
           
Diluted earnings per share$0.20

$0.10
 $0.38
 $0.07
$0.34

$0.09
 
    
Anti-dilutive securities169
 1,211
 

For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, 830,043 and 832,460, respectively, and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, 4,012,046 and 4,326,168, respectively, of our common stock equivalents issued under share-based compensation arrangements were not included in the calculation of diluted earnings per share because they were anti-dilutive. The warrants were not dilutive in 2016.
8. Warrants
We issued 992,000992 thousand warrants in connection with ourthe Private Placement. Each warrant gives the holder thereof the right to purchase one share of common stock at an exercise price equal to $10.00. The warrants were issued with an aggregate fair value of $5.1 million. Upon exercise of these
During the three months ended March 31, 2018, 54 thousand warrants the amounts will be treated as additional paid-in capital.were exercised resulting in 26 thousand common shares issued. No warrants were exercised during the ninethree months ended September 30, 2017March 31, 2017. Upon exercise, we reclassified the fair value of the warrants from warrant liability to additional paid-in capital and 2016. recognized a loss of approximately $52 thousand.
We account for these warrants to purchase our common shares in accordance with ASC 470-20, Debt with Conversion and Other Options and ASC 815-40, Derivatives and Hedging - Contracts in Entity's Own Equity.
9. Income Taxes
We are a U.S. taxpayer and are subject to a statutory U.S. federal corporate income tax rate of 21% for the current and all future years following the enactment of the TCJA on December 22, 2017. We were subject to a statutory U.S. federal corporate income tax rate of 35%. for all prior years through December 31, 2017. NMIH files a consolidated U.S. federal and various state income tax returns on behalf of itself and its subsidiaries. Our provision for income taxes for the interim reporting periods areis established based on anour estimated annual effective tax raterates for the year ending December 31, 2017.a given year. Our effective tax rate on our pre-tax income was 36.9% and 33.3%15.7% for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, respectively,March 31, 2018, compared to 1.8% and 2.6%18.5% for the comparable 2016 periods.three months ended March 31, 2017. The increasedecrease in the effective tax expenserate for the three and nine months ended September 30,March 31, 2018 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2017 against the comparable 2016 periods is attributable to the elimination ofdecrease in the statutory U.S. federal corporate income tax benefits during the comparable 2016 periods due to the recognition of a full valuation allowance which had been recorded to reflect the amount of the deferred taxes that may not be realized.rate. We currently pay no regular federal income tax primarily due to the forecasted utilization of our federal net operating loss carryforwards, which were $122.9$93.3 million as of December 31, 2016. The2017. As a result, the interim provision for income taxes include current year alternative minimum tax andrepresents changes to deferred tax assets. See Note 1
Provisional amounts
, "OrganizationThe TCJA reduced the statutory U.S. federal corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21% and Basischanged the tax deductibility of Presentation - Immaterial Correctioncertain expenses for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017. We have not completed our full assessment of Prior Period Amounts"the tax effects of the enactment of the TCJA on our deferred tax balances as of March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017; however, in certain cases, as described below, we have made reasonable estimates of the effects on our deferred tax balances. We recognized a $13.6 million income tax expense in the year ended December 31, 2017 for further details.the items we could reasonably estimate. We are still analyzing the TCJA and refining our calculations, which could impact the measurement of our existing deferred tax assets including those related to share-based compensation. For tax years beginning after December 31, 2017, the TCJA expanded the number of individuals whose

NMI HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

compensation is subject to a $1 million cap on tax deductibility and includes performance-based compensation in the calculation. As a result, we recorded a provisional amount to reduce the future tax benefit related to share-based compensation. We will continue to make and refine our calculations as additional analysis is completed. In addition, our estimates may also be affected as we incorporate additional guidance that may be issued by the U.S. Treasury Department, the IRS, or other standard-setting bodies.
In February 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-02, Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Topic 220). This update permits a company to reclassify the disproportionate income tax effects as a result of the TCJA on items within AOCI to retained earnings. We adopted this update on January 1, 2018 and adjusted the disproportionate income tax effects, or "stranded tax effects," resulting in a $0.3 million reduction to our beginning retained earnings as of January 1, 2018. The disproportionate tax effects that remain in AOCI of $4.2 million was not related to the TCJA and will remain in AOCI until certain events occur. Our elected accounting policy for available-for-sale debt securities is the "aggregate portfolio" approach.
10. StatutoryCommon Stock Offerings
In March 2018, we completed the sale of 3.7 million shares of common stock and granted the underwriters on the transaction a 15% overallotment option to purchase additional shares. The overallotment option was exercised in full, resulting in a total of 4.3 million shares of common stock issued. The common stock offering generated total proceeds of approximately $79.2 million, net of underwriting discounts, commissions and other direct offering expenses.
11. Regulatory Information
Our insurance subsidiaries, NMIC and Re One, file financial statements in conformity with statutory accounting principles (SAP) prescribed or permitted by the Wisconsin OCI, NMIC's principal regulator. Prescribed SAP includes state laws, regulations and general administrative rules, as well as a variety of publications of the National Association of Insurance Commissioners. The Wisconsin OCI recognizes only statutory accounting practices prescribed or permitted by the state of Wisconsin for determining and reporting the financial condition and results of operations of an insurance company and for determining its solvency under Wisconsin insurance laws.
NMIC and Re One's combined statutory net loss was as follows:
 For the three months ended March 31,
 2018 2017
 (In Thousands)
Statutory net loss$(6,814) $(10,090)
NMIC and Re One's statutory surplus, contingency reserve and RTCrisk to capital (RTC) ratios were as follows:
As of and for the nine months and year endedSeptember 30, 2017 December 31, 2016
(In Thousands)March 31, 2018 December 31, 2017
Statutory net loss$(29,394) $(26,653)
($ In Thousands)
Statutory surplus379,160
 413,809
$368,202
 $371,084
Contingency reserve157,326
 90,479
218,518
 186,641
Risk-to-Capital11.5:1
 11.6:1
14.4:1
 13.2:1
NMIH is not subject to any limitations on its ability to pay dividends except those generally applicable to corporations that are incorporated in Delaware. Delaware such as NMIH. Delaware corporationcorporate law provides that dividends are only payable out of a corporation's surplus or, subject to certain limitations, recent net profits (subject to certain limitations).profits. NMIC and Re One are subject to restrictions on theirOne's ability to pay dividends without prior approval of theto NMIH is subject to Wisconsin OCI.OCI notice or approval. Certain other states in which NMIC is licensed also have statutes or regulations that restrict its ability to pay dividends. Since inception, NMIC hasand Re One have not paid any dividends to NMIH.
NMI HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

12. Subsequent Event
In April 2018, NMIH made a capital contribution of $70 million to NMIC.


Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following analysis should be read in conjunction with our unaudited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included in this report and our audited financial statements, notes thereto and "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" included in our 20162017 10-K, for a more complete understanding of our financial position and results of operations. In addition, investors should review the "Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements" above and the "Risk Factors" detailed in Part II, Item 1A of this report and in Part I, Item 1A of our 20162017 10-K, as subsequently updated in other reports we file with the SEC, for a discussion of those risks and uncertainties that have the potential to affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows or prospects in a material and adverse manner. Our results of operations for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for a full fiscal year or for any other period.
Overview
We provide private MI through our wholly owned insurance subsidiaries. Oursubsidiaries NMIC and Re One. NMIC and Re One are domiciled in Wisconsin and principally regulated by the Wisconsin OCI. NMIC is our primary insurance subsidiary, NMIC,and is approved as an MI provider by the GSEs and is licensed to write MI coverage in all 50 states and D.C. Both of our insurance subsidiaries, NMIC and Re One are domiciled in Wisconsin and directly regulated by our primary regulator, the Wisconsin OCI. Re One solely provides statutorily required reinsurance to NMIC on insured loans with coverage levels in excess of 25%. after giving effect to third-party reinsurance. Our subsidiary, NMIS, provides outsourced loan review services on a limited basis to mortgage loan originators. Our stock trades on the NASDAQ under the symbol "NMIH."
MI protects lenders and investors from default-related losses on a portion of the unpaid principal balance of a covered mortgage. MI plays a critical role in the U.S. housing market by mitigating mortgage credit risk and facilitating the secondary market sale of high LTVhigh-LTV (i.e., above 80%) residential loans to the GSEs, who are otherwise restricted by their charters from purchasing or guaranteeing low down paymenthigh-LTV mortgages that are not covered by certain credit protections. Such credit protection and secondary market sales allow lenders to increase their capacity for mortgage commitments and expand financing access to existing and prospective primarily first-time, homeowners.
We were formedNMIH, a Delaware corporation, was incorporated in May 2011, and we began start-up operations in 2012 and wrote our first MI policy in 2013. Since formation, we have sought to establish customer relationships with a broad group of mortgage lenders and build a diversified, high-quality insured portfolio. As of September 30, 2017,March 31, 2018, we had master policy relationships with 1,2401,291 customers, including national and regional mortgage banks, money center banks, credit unions, community banks, builder-owned mortgage lenders and internet-sourcedother non bank lenders. As of September 30, 2017,March 31, 2018, we had $46.6$56.6 billion of total insurance-in-force (IIF), including primary IIF of $43.3$53.4 billion, and $10.7$13.2 billion of gross RIF, including primary RIF of $10.6$13.1 billion.
We believe that our success in acquiring a large and diverse group of lender customers and growing a portfolio of high-quality IIF traces to our founding principles, whereby we aim to help qualified individuals achieve the dream of homeownership, ensure that we remain a strong and credible counter-party, deliver a unique customer service experience, establish a differentiated risk management approach that emphasizes the individual underwriting review or validation of the vast majority of the loans we insure, and foster a culture of collaboration and excellence that helps us attract and retain experienced industry leaders.
Our strategy is to continue to build on our position in the private MI market, expand our customer base and grow our insured portfolio of high-quality residential loans by focusing on long-term customer relationships, disciplined and proactive risk selection and pricing, fair and transparent claims payment practices, responsive customer service, financial strength and profitability.
Our common stock trades on the NASDAQ under the symbol "NMIH."
We discuss below our results of operations for the periods presented, andas well as the conditions and trends that have impacted or are expected to impact our business.business, including customer development, new business writings, the composition of our insurance portfolio and other factors that we expect to impact our results. Our headquarters are located in Emeryville, California and our website is www.nationalmi.com. Our website and the information contained on or accessible through our website are not incorporated by reference into this report.
New Insurance Written, Insurance In Force and Risk In Force
New insurance written (NIW) is the aggregate unpaid principal balance of mortgages underpinning new policies written during a given period. Our NIW is affected by the overall size of the mortgage origination market and the volume of low down paymenthigh-LTV mortgage originations, which tend to be generated to a greater extent in purchase originations as compared to refinancings. Our NIW is also affected by the percentage of such low down paymenthigh-LTV originations covered by private versus public MI or other alternative credit enhancement structures and our share of the private MI market. NIW, together with persistency, drives our IIF. IIF is the aggregate unpaid principal balance of the mortgages we insure, as reported to us by servicers at a given date, and represents the sum total of NIW from all prior periods less principal payments on insured mortgages and policy cancellations (including for prepayment,


nonpayment of premiums, coverage rescission and claims payment)claim payments). RIF is related to IIF and represents the aggregate amount of coverage we provide on all outstanding policies at a given date. RIF is calculated as the sum total of the coverage percentage of each individual policy in our portfolio applied to the unpaid principal balance of such insured mortgage. RIF is affected by IIF and the LTV profile of our insured mortgages, with lower LTV loans generally having a lower coverage percentage and higher LTV loans having a higher coverage percentage. Gross RIF represents RIF without anybefore consideration of the impact of reinsurance. Net RIF representsis gross RIF net of ceded risk and is therefore affected by our reinsurance agreements.reinsurance.



Net Premiums Written and Net Premiums Earned
Our objective is to achieve a mid-teens return on PMIERs required assets and weWe set our premium rates on individual policies based on the risk characteristics of the underlying mortgage loans and borrowers, and in accordance with our filed rates and applicable rating rules. See " - GSE Oversight," below for a discussion of the PMIERs financial requirements.
Premiums are generally fixed over the estimated life of the underlying loans. Net premiums written are equal to gross premiums written minus ceded premiums written under our reinsurance arrangements.arrangements and less premium refunds. As a result, net premiums written are generally influenced by:
NIW;
premium rates and the mix of premium payment type, which are either single, monthly or annual premiums, as described below;
cancellation rates of our insurance policies, which are impacted by payments or prepayments on mortgages, refinancings (which are affected by prevailing mortgage interest rates)rates as compared to interest rates on loans underpinning our in force policies), levels of claims payments and home prices;
cession of premiums under third-party reinsurance arrangements.
Premiums are paid either by the borrower (BPMI) or the lender (LPMI) in a single payment at origination (single premium), on a monthly installment basis (monthly premium) or on an annual installment basis (annual premium). Our net premiums written will differ from our net premiums earned due to policy payment type. For single premiums, we receive a single premium payment at origination, which is initially recorded as unearned premium and earned over the estimated life of the policy. A majority of our single premium policies in force as of September 30,December 31, 2017 were non-refundable under most cancellation scenarios. If non-refundable single premium policies are canceled, we immediately recognize the remaining unearned premium balances as earned premium revenue. Monthly premiums are recognized in the month billed and when the coverage is effective. Annual premiums are earned on a straight-line basis over the year of coverage. Substantially all of our policies provide for either single or monthly premiums.
The percentage of IIF that remains on our books after any 12-month period is defined as our persistency rate. Because our insurance premiums are earned over the life of a policy, higher persistency rates can have a significant impact on our net premiums earned and profitability. Generally, faster speeds of mortgage prepayment lead to lower persistency. Prepayment speeds and the relative mix of business between single and monthly premium policies also impact our profitability. Our premium rates include certain assumptions regarding repayment or prepayment speeds of the mortgages underlying our policies. Because premiums are paid at origination on single premium policies and substantially all of our single premium policies are non-refundable on cancellation, assuming all other factors remain constant, if single premium loans are prepaid earlier than expected, our profitability on these loans is likely to increase and, if loans are repaid slower than expected, our profitability on these loans is likely to decrease. By contrast, if monthly premium loans are repaid earlier than anticipated, we do not earn any more premium with respect to those loans and, unless we replace the repaid monthly premium loan with a new loan at the same or greater premium rate, our profitability is likely to decline.
Effect of reinsurance on our results
We utilize third-party reinsurance to actively manage our risk, ensure PMIERs compliance and support the growth of our business. We currently have both quota share and excess-of-loss reinsurance agreements in place, which impact our results of operations and regulatory capital and PMIERs asset positions. Under a quota share reinsurance agreement, the reinsurer receives a premium in exchange for covering an agreed-upon portion of incurred losses. Such a quota share arrangement reduces net premiums written and earned and also reduces net RIF, providing capital relief to the ceding insurance company and reducing incurred claims in accordance with the terms of the reinsurance agreement. In addition, reinsurers typically pay ceding commissions as part of quota share transactions, which offset the ceding company’scompany's acquisition and underwriting expenses. Certain quota share agreements include profit commissions that are earned based on loss performance and serve to reduce ceded premiums. Under an excess-of-loss agreement, the ceding insurer is typically responsible for losses up to an agreed-upon threshold and the reinsurer then provides coverage in excess of such threshold up to a maximum agreed-upon limit. In general, there are no ceding commissions under excess-of-loss reinsurance agreements. We expect to continue to evaluate reinsurance opportunities in the normal course of business.
In September 2016,

Quota share reinsurance
NMIC entered into the 2018 QSR Transaction, which took effect January 1, 2018. Under the terms of the 2018 QSR Transaction, NMIC will cede 25% of its eligible policies written in 2018 and 20% to 30% (such amount to be determined by NMIC at its sole election by December 1, 2018) of eligible policies written in 2019, in exchange for reimbursement of ceded claims and claims expenses on covered policies, a 20% ceding commission, and a profit commission of up to 61% that varies directly and inversely with ceded claims.
NMIC entered into the 2016 QSR Transaction.Transaction in September 2016. Under the terms of the 2016 QSR Transaction, NMIC (1) ceded 100% of the risk relating to our pool agreement with Fannie Mae, and (2) ceded or will cede25% of existing risk written on eligible policies as of August 31, 2016 and (3) ceded 25% of the risk relating to eligible primary insurance policies written between September 1, 2016 and December 31, 2017, in exchange for reimbursement of ceded claims and claims expenses on covered policies, a 20% ceding commission, and a profit commission of up to 60% that varies directly and inversely with ceded claims.
Excess-of-loss reinsurance
In May 2017, NMIC secured $211.3 million of aggregate excess-of-loss reinsurance coverage at inception for an existing portfolio of MI policies written from 2013 through December 31, 2016, through a mortgage insurance-linked notes offering by


Oaktown Re. The reinsurance coverage amount under the terms of the 2017 ILN Transaction decreases from $211.3 million at inception over a ten-year period as the underlying covered mortgages amortize and/or are repaid, and was $185$166.6 million as of September 30, 2017.March 31, 2018. For the reinsurance coverage period, NMIC will retain the first layer of $126.8 million of aggregate losses and Oaktown Re will then provide a second layer of coverage up to the outstanding reinsurance coverage amount. NMIC retains losses in excess of the outstanding reinsurance coverage amount.
See, Item 1, "Financial Statements - Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements - Note 5, Reinsurance" for further discussion of these third-party reinsurance arrangements.
Portfolio Data
The following table presents primary and pool NIW and IIF as of the dates and for the periods indicated. Unless otherwise noted, the tables below do not include the effects of our third-party reinsurance arrangements described above.
Primary and pool IIF and NIWAs of and for the three months ended For the nine months endedAs of and for the three months ended
September 30, 2017 September 30, 2016 September 30, 2017 September 30, 2016March 31, 2018 March 31, 2017
IIF NIW IIF NIW NIWIIF NIW IIF NIW
  (In Millions)  (In Millions)
Monthly$28,707
 $4,833
 $16,038
 $4,162
 $11,824
 $10,354
$37,574
 $5,441
 $21,511
 $2,892
Single14,552
 1,282
 12,190
 1,695
 2,887
 5,595
15,860
 1,019
 13,268
 667
Primary43,259
 6,115
 28,228
 5,857
 14,711
 15,949
53,434
 6,460
 34,779
 3,559
                  
Pool3,330
 
 3,826
 $
 
 
3,153
 
 3,545
 $
Total$46,589
 $6,115
 $32,054
 $5,857
 $14,711
 $15,949
$56,587
 $6,460
 $38,324
 $3,559
For the three months ended September 30, 2017,March 31, 2018, primary NIW increased 4%82%, compared to the same period in 2016,three months ended March 31, 2017, primarily because of the growth withinin our monthly policy volume tied to increased penetration of existing customer accounts and an expansion of ournew customer base. Primary NIW decreased 8% for the nine months ended September 30, 2017, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2016, due to a reductionaccount activations, with additional benefit from growth in our single policy production, driven primarily by actions we initiated to reduce the concentration of single policies in our product mix, partially offset by growth in our monthly policy volume. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017,March 31, 2018, monthly premium NIW increased 16% and 14%, respectively,88% compared to the same periods a year ago, driven primarily by the growth of our customer base.three months ended March 31, 2017.
For the ninethree months ended September 30, 2017, 80%March 31, 2018, 84% of our NIW related to monthly premium policies. As of September 30, 2017,March 31, 2018, monthly premium policies accounted for 66%70% of our primary IIF, as compared to 60%62% at DecemberMarch 31, 2016 and 57% at September 30, 2016.2017. We expect the break-down of monthly premium policies and single premium policies (which we refer to as "mix") in our primary IIF to continue to trend toward our current NIW mix over time. Our total IIF increased 45%48% as of September 30, 2017March 31, 2018 compared to September 30, 2016,March 31, 2017, primarily because of ourthe NIW we generated between such measurement dates and higherthe high persistency of our policies in force.


The following table presents net premiums written and earned for the periods indicated.
Primary and pool premiums written and earnedFor the three months endedFor the nine months endedFor the three months ended
September 30, 2017 September 30, 2016September 30, 2017September 30, 2016March 31, 2018 March 31, 2017
(In Thousands)(In Thousands)
Net premiums written (1)
$47,716
 $9,199
$122,105
$96,190
$59,030
 $34,604
Net premiums earned (1)
44,519
 31,808
115,661
77,656
54,914
 33,225
(1) Net premiums written and earned are reported net of reinsurance.reinsurance and premium refunds.
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017,March 31, 2018, net premiums written increased 419% and 27%, respectively,71% and net premiums earned increased 40% and 49%65%, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2016.three months ended March 31, 2017. The increasesincrease in net premiums written areis due to the growth of our IIF and increased monthly and single policy production, partially offset by increased cessions under the QSR Transactions tied to the growth of our direct premium volume. The increase in net premiums earned is primarily due to the growth in our IIF, increased monthly and single policy production, and IIFhigher earnings from cancellations, partially offset by increased cessions under the QSR Transactions tied to the growth of our direct premium volume and the initial cession of premiums written on IIF at the inception of the 2016 QSR Transaction, partially offset by the decrease in single premium NIW. The increases in net premiums earned are primarily due to growth in our monthly policy production and IIF, partially offset by cessions under the 2016 QSR Transaction and 2017 ILN Transaction and, compared to the same periods in 2016, reductions in our single premium policy production and earnings


from cancellations.May 2017. Pool premiums written and earned for the three and nine months ended September 30,March 31, 2018 and 2017, were $0.9 million and $2.9$1.0 million, respectively, before the effects of the 2016 QSR Transaction.Transaction, under which all of our written and earned pool premiums have been ceded.
Portfolio Statistics
Unless otherwise noted, the portfolio statistics tables presented below do not include the effects of our third-party reinsurance arrangements described above. The table below highlights trends in our primary portfolio as of the date and for the periods indicated.
Primary portfolio trendsAs of and for the three months endedAs of and for the three months ended
September 30, 2017 June 30, 2017 March 31, 2017 December 31, 2016 September 30, 2016March 31, 2018 December 31, 2017 September 30, 2017 June 30, 2017 March 31, 2017
($ Values In Millions)($ In Millions)
New insurance written$6,115
 $5,037
 $3,559
 $5,240
 $5,857
$6,460
 $6,876
 $6,115
 $5,037
 $3,559
Percentage of monthly premium84% 83% 79% 81% 81%
Percentage of single premium16% 17% 21% 19% 19%
New risk written1,496
 1,242
 868
 1,244
 1,415
$1,580
 $1,665
 $1,496
 $1,242
 $868
Insurance in force (1)
43,259
 38,629
 34,779
 32,168
 28,228
Insurance in force (IIF) (1)
53,434
 48,465
 43,259
 38,629
 34,779
Percentage of monthly premium70% 69% 66% 64% 62%
Percentage of single premium30% 31% 34% 36% 38%
Risk in force (1)
10,572
 9,417
 8,444
 7,790
 6,847
$13,085
 $11,843
 $10,572
 $9,417
 $8,444
Policies in force (count) (1)
180,089
 161,195
 145,632
 134,662
 119,002
223,263
 202,351
 180,089
 161,195
 145,632
Average loan size (1)
$0.240
 $0.240
 $0.239
 $0.239
 $0.237
$0.239
 $0.240
 $0.240
 $0.240
 $0.239
Weighted-average coverage (2)
24.4% 24.4% 24.3% 24.2% 24.3%
Average coverage (2)
24.5% 24.4% 24.4% 24.4% 24.3%
Loans in default (count)350
 249
 207
 179
 115
1,000
 928
 350
 249
 207
Percentage of loans in default0.2% 0.2% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1%0.5% 0.5% 0.2% 0.2% 0.1%
Risk in force on defaulted loans$19
 $14
 $12
 $10
 $6
$57
 $53
 $19
 $14
 $12
Average premium yield (3)
0.43% 0.41% 0.40% 0.44% 0.48%0.43% 0.44% 0.43% 0.41% 0.40%
Earnings from cancellations$4.3
 $3.8
 $2.5
 $5.1
 $5.8
$2.8
 $4.2
 $4.3
 $3.8
 $2.5
Annual persistency85.1% 83.1% 81.3% 80.7% 81.8%
Quarterly run-off (4)
3.8% 3.4% 2.9% 4.6% 5.3%
Annual persistency (4)
85.7% 86.1% 85.1% 83.1% 81.3%
Quarterly run-off (5)
3.1% 3.9% 3.8% 3.4% 2.9%

(1) 
Reported as of the end of the period.
(2) 
Calculated as end of period RIF divided by IIF.
(3) 
Calculated as net primary and pool premiums earned, net of reinsurance, divided by average gross primary IIF for the period, annualized.
(4) 
Defined as the percentage of IIF that remains on our books after any 12-month period.
(5)
Defined as the percentage of IIF that is no longer on our books after any three-month3-month period.


The table below presents a summary of the change in total primary IIF during the periods indicated.
Primary IIFFor the three months ended For the nine months endedFor the three months ended
September 30, 2017 September 30, 2016 September 30, 2017 September 30, 2016March 31, 2018 March 31, 2017
(In Millions)(In Millions)
IIF, beginning of period$38,629
 $23,624
 $32,168
 $14,824
$48,465
 $32,168
NIW6,115
 5,857
 14,711
 15,949
6,460
 3,559
Cancellations and other reductions(1,485) (1,253) (3,620) (2,545)(1,491) (948)
IIF, end of period$43,259
 $28,228
 $43,259
 $28,228
$53,434
 $34,779
We consider a "book" to be a collective pool of policies insured during a particular period, normally a calendar year. In general, the majority of underwriting profit, calculated as earned premium revenue minus claims and underwriting and operating expenses, generated by a particular book year emerges in the years immediately following origination. This pattern generally occurs because relatively few of the claims that a book will ultimately experience typically occur in the first few years following origination, when premium revenue is highest, while subsequent years are affected by declining premium revenues, as the number of insured loans decreases (primarily due to loan prepayments), and by increasing losses.
The table below presents a summary of our primary IIF and RIF by book year as of the dates indicated.
Primary IIF and RIFAs of September 30, 2017 As of September 30, 2016As of March 31, 2018 As of March 31, 2017
IIF RIF IIF RIFIIF RIF IIF RIF
(In Millions)(In Millions)
September 30, 2017$14,315
 $3,508
 $
 $
March 31, 2018$6,427
 $1,573
 $
 $
201720,272
 4,948
 3,544
 865
201618,684
 4,520
 15,433
 3,719
17,497
 4,262
 19,774
 4,756
20158,742
 2,167
 10,679
 2,610
7,913
 1,971
 9,681
 2,384
20141,479
 368
 2,062
 505
1,292
 323
 1,735
 428
201339
 9
 54
 13
33
 8
 45
 11
Total$43,259
 $10,572
 $28,228
 $6,847
$53,434
 $13,085
 $34,779
 $8,444
We utilize certain risk principles that form the basis of how we underwrite and originate primary NIW. We manage our portfolio credit risk by using several loan eligibility matrices which prescribe the maximum LTV, minimum borrower credit score, maximum borrower debt-to-income ratio, maximum loan size, property type, loan type, loan term and occupancy status of loans that we will insure. Our loan eligibility matrices, as well as all of our detailed underwriting guidelines, are contained in our Underwriting Guideline Manual that is publicly available on our website. Our eligibility criteria and underwriting guidelines are designed to mitigate the layered risk inherent in a single insurance policy. "Layered risk" refers to the accumulation of borrower, loan and property risk. For example, we have higher credit score and lower maximum allowed LTV requirements for investor-owned properties, compared to owner-occupied properties. We monitor the concentrations of various risk attributes in our insurance portfolio, which may change over time, in part, as a result of regional conditions or public policy shifts.


The tables below present our primary NIW by FICO, LTV and purchase/refinance mix for the periods indicated. We calculate the LTV of a loan as the percentage of the original loan amount to the original purchase value of the property securing the loan.
Primary NIW by FICOFor the three months ended For the nine months endedFor the three months ended
September 30, 2017 September 30, 2016 September 30, 2017 September 30, 2016March 31, 2018 March 31, 2017
($ In Millions)($ In Millions)
>= 760$2,806
 $2,975
 $6,865
 $8,418
$2,619
 $1,683
740-759934
 934
 2,277
 2,606
1,073
 551
720-739807
 725
 1,889
 1,870
914
 456
700-719697
 588
 1,662
 1,540
811
 396
680-699456
 387
 1,088
 940
567
 264
<=679415
 248
 930
 575
476
 209
Total$6,115
 $5,857
 $14,711
 $15,949
$6,460
 $3,559
Weighted average FICO747
 753
 748
 754
743
 749
Primary NIW by LTVFor the three months endedFor the nine months endedFor the three months ended
September 30, 2017 September 30, 2016September 30, 2017 September 30, 2016March 31, 2018 March 31, 2017
($ In Millions)($ In Millions)
95.01% and above$722
 $347
$1,470
 $918
$997
 $274
90.01% to 95.00%2,714
 2,557
6,623
 7,005
2,765
 1,612
85.01% to 90.00%1,765
 1,844
4,372
 4,996
1,755
 1,101
85.00% and below914
 1,109
2,246
 3,030
943
 572
Total$6,115
 $5,857
$14,711
 $15,949
$6,460
 $3,559
Weighted average LTV92.3% 91.7%92.2% 91.6%92.5% 92.0%
Primary NIW by purchase/refinance mixFor the three months ended For the nine months endedFor the three months ended
September 30, 2017 September 30, 2016 September 30, 2017 September 30, 2016March 31, 2018 March 31, 2017
(In Millions)(In Millions)
Purchase$5,387
 $4,400
 $12,889
 $11,518
$5,425
 $2,984
Refinance728
 1,457
 1,822
 4,431
1,035
 575
Total$6,115
 $5,857
 $14,711
 $15,949
$6,460
 $3,559
The tables below present our total primary IIF and RIF by FICO and LTV and total primary RIF by loan type as of the dates indicated.
Primary IIF by FICOAs of
 September 30, 2017 September 30, 2016
 ($ Values In Millions)
>= 760$21,329
 49% $14,258
 50%
740-7596,983
 16
 4,612
 16
720-7395,547
 13
 3,648
 13
700-7194,505
 10
 2,813
 10
680-6992,942
 7
 1,863
 7
<=6791,953
 5
 1,034
 4
Total$43,259
 100% $28,228
 100%
Primary RIF by FICOAs of
Primary IIF by FICOAs of
September 30, 2017 September 30, 2016March 31, 2018 March 31, 2017
($ Values In Millions)($ In Millions)
>= 760$5,251
 50% $3,470
 51%$25,371
 48% $17,408
 50%
740-7591,713
 16
 1,130
 17
8,635
 16
 5,658
 16
720-7391,349
 13
 887
 13
6,981
 13
 4,460
 13
700-7191,092
 10
 680
 10
5,814
 11
 3,533
 10
680-699707
 7
 443
 6
3,852
 7
 2,336
 7
<=679460
 4
 237
 3
2,781
 5
 1,384
 4
Total$10,572
 100% $6,847
 100%$53,434
 100% $34,779
 100%


Primary IIF by LTVAs of
 September 30, 2017 September 30, 2016
 ($ Values In Millions)
95.01% and above$3,038
 7% $1,363
 5%
90.01% to 95.00%19,562
 45
 12,644
 45
85.01% to 90.00%13,437
 31
 9,157
 32
85.00% and below7,222
 17
 5,064
 18
Total$43,259
 100% $28,228
 100%
Primary RIF by FICOAs of
 March 31, 2018 March 31, 2017
 ($ In Millions)
>= 760$6,246
 48% $4,253
 50%
740-7592,125
 16
 1,383
 16
720-7391,710
 13
 1,081
 13
700-7191,416
 11
 851
 10
680-699932
 7
 556
 7
<=679656
 5
 320
 4
Total$13,085
 100% $8,444
 100%
Primary RIF by LTVAs of
Primary IIF by LTVAs of
September 30, 2017 September 30, 2016March 31, 2018 March 31, 2017
($ Values In Millions)($ In Millions)
95.01% and above$822
 8% $380
 6%$4,872
 9% $1,931
 5%
90.01% to 95.00%5,722
 54
 3,725
 54
23,937
 45
 15,601
 45
85.01% to 90.00%3,205
 30
 2,174
 32
16,034
 30
 11,058
 32
85.00% and below823
 8
 568
 8
8,591
 16
 6,189
 18
Total$10,572
 100% $6,847
 100%$53,434
 100% $34,779
 100%
Primary RIF by Loan TypeAs of
 September 30, 2017 September 30, 2016
    
Fixed98% 98%
Adjustable rate mortgages:   
Less than five years
 
Five years and longer2
 2
Total100% 100%
Primary RIF by LTVAs of
 March 31, 2018 March 31, 2017
 ($ In Millions)
95.01% and above$1,294
 10% $533
 6%
90.01% to 95.00%6,978
 53
 4,585
 55
85.01% to 90.00%3,831
 29
 2,626
 31
85.00% and below982
 8
 700
 8
Total$13,085
 100% $8,444
 100%
Primary RIF by Loan TypeAs of
 March 31, 2018 March 31, 2017
    
Fixed98% 99%
Adjustable rate mortgages:   
Less than five years
 
Five years and longer2
 1
Total100% 100%


The table below shows selected primary portfolio statistics, by book year, as of September 30, 2017.March 31, 2018.
As of September 30, 2017As of March 31, 2018
Book yearOriginal Insurance Written Remaining Insurance in Force % Remaining of Original Insurance Policies Ever in Force Number of Policies in Force Number of Loans in Default # of Claims Paid 
Incurred Loss Ratio (Inception to Date) (1)
 
Cumulative default rate (2)
Original Insurance Written Remaining Insurance in Force % Remaining of Original Insurance Policies Ever in Force Number of Policies in Force Number of Loans in Default # of Claims Paid 
Incurred Loss Ratio (Inception to Date) (1)
 
Cumulative default rate (2)
($ Values in Millions)($ Values in Millions)
2013$162
 $39
 24% 655
 201
 
 1
 0.2% 0.2%$162
 $33
 20% 655
 177
 1
 1
 0.3% 0.3%
20143,451
 1,479
 43% 14,786
 7,451
 54
 9
 3.8% 0.4%3,451
 1,292
 37% 14,786
 6,627
 79
 17
 3.8% 0.6%
201512,422
 8,742
 70% 52,548
 39,727
 164
 14
 2.9% 0.3%12,422
 7,913
 64% 52,548
 36,383
 338
 27
 3.1% 0.7%
201621,187
 18,684
 88% 83,626
 76,095
 119
 3
 1.6% 0.1%21,187
 17,497
 83% 83,626
 72,004
 374
 11
 2.4% 0.5%
201714,711
 14,315
 97% 57,800
 56,615
 13
 
 0.5% 
21,583
 20,272
 94% 85,900
 82,145
 207
 
 2.3% 0.2%
20186,460
 6,427
 99% 26,026
 25,927
 1
 
 0.5% %
Total$51,933
 $43,259
 
 209,415
 180,089
 350
 27
 
 
$65,265
 $53,434
 
 263,541
 223,263
 1,000
 56
 
 

(1) 
The ratio of total claims incurred (paid and reserved) divided by cumulative premiums earned, net of reinsurance.
(2) 
The sum of the number of claims paid ever to date and number of loans in default as of the end of the period divided by policies ever in force.
Geographic Dispersion
The following table shows the distribution by state of our primary RIF as of the periods indicated. As of September 30, 2017,March 31, 2018, our RIF continues to be relatively more concentrated in California, primarily as a result of the size of the California mortgage market relative to the rest of the country and the location and timing of theour acquisition of new customers. The distribution of risk as of September 30, 2017March 31, 2018 is not necessarily representative of the geographic distribution we expect in the future.


Top 10 primary RIF by stateAs ofAs of
September 30, 2017 September 30, 2016March 31, 2018 March 31, 2017
California13.6% 13.2%13.5% 13.8%
Texas7.6
 6.8
8.0
 7.2
Virginia5.6
 6.6
5.1
 6.3
Arizona4.4
 3.8
4.8
 4.1
Florida4.3
 4.7
4.7
 4.4
Colorado3.8
 4.0
Michigan3.7
 3.9
3.7
 3.7
Pennsylvania3.6
 3.6
3.6
 3.6
Colorado3.5
 3.9
Maryland3.4
 3.7
Utah3.6
 3.6
3.4
 3.6
Maryland3.6
 3.6
Total53.8% 53.8%53.7% 54.3%
Insurance Claims and ClaimsClaim Expenses
Insurance claims and claimsclaim expenses incurred represent estimated future payments on newly defaulted insured loans and any change in our claim estimates for previously existing defaults. Claims incurred is generally affected by a variety of factors, including the state of the economy, changes in housing values, loan and borrower level risk characteristics, the size of loans insured and the percentage of coverage on insured loans.
Reserves for claims and allocated claimsclaim expenses are established for mortgage loan defaults, which we refer to as case reserves, when we are notified that a borrower has missed two or more mortgage payments (i.e., an NOD). We also make estimates of IBNR defaults, which are defaults that have been incurred but have not been reported by loan servicers, based uponon historical reporting trends, and establish IBNR reserves for those estimates. We also establish reserves for unallocated claims expenses not associated with a specific claim. The claims expenses consist of the estimated cost of the claim administration process, including legal and other fees as well as other general expenses of administering the claims settlement process.


Reserves are established by estimating the number of loans in default that will result in a claim payment, which is referred to as claim frequency, and the amount of the claim payment expected to be paid on each such loan in default, which is referred to as claim severity. Claim frequency and severity estimates are established based on historical observed experience regarding certain loan factors, such as age of the default, cure rates, size of the loan and estimated change in property valuation. Reserves are released the month in which a loan in default is brought current by the borrower, which is referred to as a cure. Adjustments to reserve estimates are reflected in the period in which the adjustment is made. Reserves are also ceded to reinsurers under our 2016the QSR Transaction.Transactions. We will not cede reserves to the reinsurer under the 2017 ILN Transaction unless losses exceed our retained coverage layer. Reserves are not established for future claims on insured loans which are not currently in default.
We expect our insurance claims and claims expenses to be relatively low in the near-term. Based on our experience and industry data, we believe that claims incidence for mortgage insurance is generally highest in the third through sixth years after loan origination. As of September 30, 2017, over 95% of our primary IIF was related to business written since January 1, 2015. Additionally, our pool insurance agreement with Fannie Mae contains a claim deductible through which Fannie Mae absorbs specified losses before we are obligated to pay any claims. We have not established any pool reserves for claims or IBNR to date. Although the claims experience on new primary insurance written by us to date has been favorable, we expect incurred claims to increase as a greater amount of our existing insured portfolio reaches its anticipated period of highest claim frequency. We estimate that the loss ratio over the life of our existing primary insured portfolio will be between 20% and 25% of earned premiums, and we price to that expectation. Additionally, our pool insurance agreement with Fannie Mae contains a claim deductible through which Fannie Mae absorbs specified losses before we are obligated to pay any claims. We have not established any pool reserves for claims or IBNR to date.
The actual claims we incur as our portfolio matures are difficult to predict and depend on the specific characteristics of our current in-force book (including the credit score and DTI of the borrower, the LTV ratio of the mortgage and geographic concentrations, among others), as well as the profile of new business we write in the future. In addition, claims experience will be affected by future macroeconomic factors such as housing prices, interest rates and employment.employment and other events, such as natural catastrophes. To date, our claims experience is developing at a slower pace than historical trends indicate, as a result of high quality underwriting, a strong macroeconomic environment and a favorable housing market. For additional discussion of our reserves, see, Item 1, "Financial Statements - Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements - Note 6, Reserves for Insurance Claims and Claims Expenses."
We insure mortgages for homes in areas that have been impacted by recent natural disasters, including hurricanes Harvey and Irma and the fires in Northern California.California wildfires. We do not provide coverage for property or casualty claims related to physical damage of a home underpinning an insured mortgage. We anticipate that we will experiencehave experienced an increase in NODs on insured loans in the


impacted areas. Our ultimate claims exposure will depend on the number of NODs received, proximate cause of each default and cure rate of the NOD population. In the event of natural disasters, cure rates are influenced by the adequacy of homeowners and floodother hazard insurance carried on a related property, GSE-sponsored forbearance and other assistance programs, and a borrower's access to aid from government entities and private organizations, in addition to other factors which generally impact cure rates in unaffected areas.



The following table provides a reconciliation of the beginning and ending reserve balances for primary insurance claims and claims expenses.
For the three months ended For the nine months ended For the three months ended
September 30, 2017 September 30, 2016 September 30, 2017 September 30, 2016 March 31, 2018 March 31, 2017
(In Thousands)(In Thousands)
Beginning balance$5,048
 $1,475
 $3,001
 $679
 $8,761
 $3,001
Less reinsurance recoverables (1)
(899) 
 (297) 
 (1,902) (297)
Beginning balance, net of reinsurance recoverables4,149
 1,475
 2,704
 679
 6,859
 2,704
           
Add claims incurred:           
Claims and claim expenses incurred:           
Current year (2)
1,215
 690
 3,546
 1,803
 1,940
 955
Prior years (3)
(258) (29) (581) (214) (371) (320)
Total claims and claims expenses incurred957
 661
 2,965
 1,589
 1,569
 635
           
Less claims paid:           
Claims and claim expenses paid:           
Current year (2)

 
 
 
 
 
Prior years (3)
157
 93
 720
 225
 371
 142
Total claims and claim expenses paid157
 93
 720
 225
 371
 142
           
Reserve at end of period, net of reinsurance recoverables4,949
 2,043
 4,949
 2,043
 8,057
 3,197
Add reinsurance recoverables (1)
1,174
 90
 1,174
 90
 2,334
 564
Ending balance$6,123
 $2,133
 $6,123
 $2,133
 $10,391
 $3,761
(1) Related to ceded losses recoverable onunder the 2016 QSR Transaction,Transactions, included in "Other Assets" on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. See Item 1, "Financial Statements - Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - Note 5, Reinsurance" for additional information.
(2) Related to insured loans with their most recent defaults occurring in the current year. For example, if a loan had defaulted in a prior year and subsequently cured and later re-defaulted in the current year, that default would be included in the current year.
(3) Related to insured loans with defaults occurring in prior years, which have been continuously in default since that time.
The "claims incurred" section of the table above shows claims and claim expenses incurred on NODs for current and prior years, including IBNR reserves. The amount of claims incurred relating tofor current year NODs represents the estimated amount to be ultimately paid on such loans in default. The decreases during the periods presented in reserves held for prior year defaults represent favorable development and are generally the result of NOD cures and ongoing analysis of recent loss development trends. We may increase or decrease our original estimates as we learn additional information about individual defaults and claims, and continue to observe and analyze loss development trends in our portfolio.


Gross reserves of $7.2 million related to prior year defaults remained as of March 31, 2018.
The following table provides a reconciliation of the beginning and ending count of loans in default for the periods indicated.
For the three months ended For the nine months ended For the three months ended
September 30, 2017 September 30, 2016 September 30, 2017 September 30, 2016 March 31, 2018 March 31, 2017
Beginning default inventory249
 79
 179
 36
 928
 179
Plus: new defaults208
 69
 479
 158
 413
 124
Less: cures(103) (30) (292) (73) (324) (92)
Less: claims paid(4) (3) (16) (6) (17) (4)
Ending default inventory350
 115
 350
 115
 1,000
 207


The increase in the ending default inventory at September 30, 2017March 31, 2018 compared to September 30, 2016March 31, 2017 was primarily due to new defaults on insured loans in areas impacted by hurricanes Harvey and Irma and the California wildfires, as well as the aging of earlier book years and an increase in the overall number of policies in force and expected loss development of our portfolio.
The following table provides details of our claims paid, before giving effect to claims paidceded under the 2016 QSR Transaction, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and September 30, 2016.periods indicated. No claims were ceded under the 2018 QSR Transaction during the periods indicated.
For the three months ended For the nine months ended For the three months ended
September 30, 2017 September 30, 2016 September 30, 2017 September 30, 2016 March 31, 2018 March 31, 2017
($ Values In Thousands)($ In Thousands)
Number of claims paid(1)4
 3
 16
 6
 17
 4
Total amount paid for claims$160
 $93
 $731
 $225
 $482
 $142
Average amount paid per claim(2)$40
 $31
 $46
 $32
 $34
 $35
Severity(1)(3)
73% 53% 83% 62% 74% 88%
(1)Count includes claims settled without payment.
(2) Calculation is net of claims settled without payment.
(3) Severity represents the total amount of claims paid divided by the related RIF on the loan at the time the claim is perfected.

The increase in the number of claims paid for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017March 31, 2018 compared to the same periodsthree months ended September 30, 2016March 31, 2017 is due to an increase in our default inventory. Claims settled without payment are included in claim counts, but excluded from averages. We expect the severity of claims we receivepaid to be between 85% and 95% of the coverage amount. We believe our severity is below long-term expectations due to home price appreciation in recent periods.

The following table shows our average reserve per default, before giving effect to reserves ceded under the QSR Transactions, as of the periods indicated.
Average reserve per default:As of September 30, 2017 As of September 30, 2016As of March 31, 2018 As of March 31, 2017
(In Thousands)(In Thousands)
Case (1)
$16
 $17
$9
 $16
IBNR1
 1
1
 2
Total$17
 $18
$10
 $18
(1)Defined as the gross reserve per insured loan in default.

The average reserve per default at March 31, 2018 decreased from March 31, 2017, primarily due to new defaults on insured loans in areas impacted by hurricanes Harvey and Irma and the California wildfires.  As of March 31, 2018, 474 of the 1,000 loans in default relate to homes in areas declared by FEMA to be disaster zones following the aforementioned natural disasters.  We anticipate that this population of loans in default will cure at a higher rate than the estimated rate we apply to non-disaster related loans in default, due to our Master Policy coverage terms, historical industry experience, and current economic indicators and relief programs. As such, we have established lower reserves for these NODs than we otherwise do for similarly situated NODs in non-disaster zones. Over time, we anticipate that our average reserve per default will revert to our historical averages as the NODs in these zones cure.
GSE Oversight
As an Approved Insurer, NMIC is subject to ongoing compliance with the PMIERs. (Italicized terms have the same meaning that such terms have in the PMIERs, as described below.) The PMIERs establish operational, business, remedial and financial requirements applicable to Approved Insurers. The PMIERs financial requirements prescribe a risk-based methodology whereby the amount of assets required to be held against each insured loan is determined based on certain risk characteristics, such as FICO, vintage (year of origination), performing vs. non-performing (i.e., current vs. delinquent), LTV and other risk features. An asset charge is calculated for each insured loan based on its risk profile. In general, higher quality loans carry lower charges.
Under the PMIERs financial requirements, Approved Insurers must maintain available assets that equal or exceed minimum required assets, which is an amount equal to the greater of (i) $400 million or (ii) a total risk-based required asset amount. The risk-based required asset amount is a function of the risk profile of an Approved InsurersInsurer's net RIF, calculated by applying on a loan-


by-loan basis certain risk-based factors derived from tables set out in the PMIERs to the net RIF, and other transactional adjustments approved by the GSEs, such as with respect to our 2017 ILN Transaction and 2016 QSR Transaction.Transactions. The risk-based required asset amount for primary insurance is subject to a floor of 5.6% of total, performing, primary RIF, and the risk-based required asset amount for pool insurance considers both the factors in the tables and the net remaining stop loss for each pool insurance policy. The PMIERs financial requirements also increase the amount of available assets that must be held by an Approved Insurer for LPMI policies originated on or after January 1, 2016.
By April 15th of each year, NMIC must certify it met all PMIERs requirements as of December 31st of the prior year. We certified to the GSEs by April 15, 20172018 that NMIC fully compliedwas in full compliance with the PMIERs as of December 31, 2016.2017. NMIC also has an ongoing obligation to immediately notify the GSEs in writing upon discovery of its failure to meet one or more of the PMIERs requirements. We continuously monitor our compliance with the PMIERs.
The following table provides a comparison of the PMIERs financial requirements as reported by NMIC as of the dates indicated.
As of As of 
September 30, 2017 September 30, 2016 March 31, 2018 March 31, 2017 
(In Thousands) (In Thousands) 
Available assets$495,182
 $488,635
 $555,336
 $466,982
 
Risk-based required assets356,207
 320,609
 522,260
 398,859
 
The increase in available assetsof $88 million as of September 30, 2017March 31, 2018 compared to September 30, 2016March 31, 2017 is driven by theour positive cash flow from operations, and amortization ofpartially offset by an increase in our unearned premium reserves.reserve. The increase in the risk-based required asset amount is due to the growth of our gross RIF and increase in our NOD population, which has a higher risk-based required asset amount charge, partially offset by the cession of risk relating to our third-party reinsurance agreements.
In April 2018, NMIH made a capital contribution of $70 million to NMIC, directly increasing NMIC's available assets and, consequently, its cushion between available assets and risk-based required asset amount.
On December 18, 2017, the GSEs provided us with a confidential summary of the proposed changes to the PMIERs financial, business and other requirements that they are developing with the FHFA. We have engaged in conversations with the FHFA and the GSEs about the proposed changes and expect to continue to provide feedback to them in the coming months. Once changes to the PMIERs requirements are finalized, we expect the industry will be afforded a six-month implementation period and currently anticipate that updated PMIERs requirements, if any, will take effect no sooner than the fourth quarter of 2018.
Capital Position of Our Insurance Subsidiaries and Financial Strength Ratings
In addition to GSE-imposed asset requirements, NMIC is also subject to state regulatory minimum capital requirements based on its RIF. While formulations of this minimum capital may vary by jurisdiction, the most common measure allows for a maximum permitted RTC ratio of 25:1.
As of September 30, 2017,March 31, 2018, NMIC's primary RIF, net of reinsurance, was approximately $6.2$8.4 billion. NMIC ceded 100% of its pool RIF pursuant to the 2016 QSR Transaction. Based on NMIC's total statutory surplus of $502.6$552.6 million (including contingency reserves) as of September 30, 2017,March 31, 2018, NMIC's RTC ratio was 12.3:15.2:1. The $70 million capital contribution from NMIH to NMIC in April 2018 increases NMIC's statutory surplus dollar-for-dollar, and consequently, reduces it's RTC ratio. Re One had total statutory capital of $33.9$34.2 million as of September 30, 2017,March 31, 2018, with a RTC ratio of 0.7:0.9:1. We continuously monitor our compliance with state capital requirements.
In AugustMarch 2017, Moody's Investors Service (Moody's) upgraded its financial strength rating from "Ba2" to "Ba1" for NMIC. At that time, Moody's also upgraded its rating of NMIH's $150 million Term Loan from "B2" to "B1." In August 2017, Moody's re-affirmed its "Ba1" financial strength rating for NMIC and its B2B1 rating of NMIH's $150 million Term Loan. Moody'sLoan and upgraded the outlook for both ratings changed from " stable""stable" to " positive."positive." In July 2017, S&P re-affirmed its "BBB-" financial strength and long-term counter-party credit ratings on NMIC and its"BB-its "BB-" long-term counter-party credit rating on NMIH. S&P'sNMIH and upgraded the outlook for both companies isratings to "positive."
Competition
The MI industry is highly competitive and currently consists of six private mortgage insurers, including NMIC, as well as governmental agenciespublic MIs like the FHA and the VA. Private MI companies compete based on service, customer relationships, underwriting and


other factors, including price. We expect the MI market to remain competitive, with pressure for industry participants to grow or maintain their market share.
The private MI industry overall competes more broadly with government entitiespublic MIs who significantly increased their presence in the MI market following the financial crisis. Although there has been broad policy consensus toward the need for private capital to play a larger role and government credit risk to be reduced in the U.S. housing finance system, it remains difficult to predict whether the combined market share of governmental agencies such as the FHA and VApublic MIs will recede to historical levels. A range of factors influence a lender's decision to choose private MI over governmental insurance options,public MI, including among others, premium rates and other charges, loan eligibility requirements, cancelability, loan size limits and the relative ease of use of private MI products compared to governmentalpublic MI alternatives.


Consolidated Results of Operations
Consolidated statements of operationsThree months ended Nine months ended For the three months ended
September 30, 2017 September 30, 2016 September 30, 2017 September 30, 2016 March 31, 2018 March 31, 2017
Revenues(In Thousands)(In Thousands)
Net premiums earned$44,519
 $31,808
 $115,661
 $77,656
 $54,914
 $33,225
Net investment income4,170
 3,544
 11,885
 10,117
 4,574
 3,807
Net realized investment gains (losses)69
 66
 198
 (758)
Net realized investment losses 
 (58)
Other revenues195
 102
 461
 172
 64
 80
Total revenues48,953
 35,520
 128,205
 87,187
 59,552
 37,054
Expenses           
Insurance claims and claims expenses957
 664
 2,965
 1,592
Insurance claims and claim expenses 1,569
 635
Underwriting and operating expenses24,645
 24,037
 78,682
 69,943
 28,453
 25,989
Total expenses25,602
 24,701
 81,647
 71,535
 30,022
 26,624
Other expense           
Loss from change in fair value of warrant liability(502) (797) (679) (187)
Gain (Loss) from change in fair value of warrant liability 420
 (196)
Interest expense(3,352) (3,733) (10,146) (11,072) (3,419) (3,494)
Income before income taxes19,497
 6,289
 35,733
 4,393
 26,531
 6,740
Income tax expense7,185
 114
 11,917
 114
 4,176
 1,248
Net income$12,312
 $6,175
 $23,816
 $4,279
 $22,355
 $5,492
           
Loss ratio(1)
2.1% 2.1% 2.6% 2.1% 2.9% 1.9%
Expense ratio(2)
55.4% 75.6% 68.0% 90.1% 51.8% 78.2%
Combined ratio57.5% 77.7% 70.6% 92.2% 54.7% 80.1%
(1) Loss ratio is calculated by dividing the provision for insurance claims and claims expenses by net premiums earned.
(2) Expense ratio is calculated by dividing other underwriting and operating expenses by net premiums earned.
Revenues
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017,March 31, 2018, net premiums earned increased $12.7$21.7 million or 40% and $38.0 million or 49%65%, respectively, compared to the corresponding three and nine months ended September 30, 2016.March 31, 2017. The increase in both periods is primarily due to the continued growth inof our IIF, increased monthly policy production and IIF, partially offset by the effects of the 2016 QSR Transaction and 2017 ILN Transaction and reductions in our single policy production, and higher earnings from early policy cancellations.cancellations, partially offset by cessions under the QSR Transactions tied to the growth of our direct premium volume and the inception of the 2017 ILN Transaction in May 2017.
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017,March 31, 2018, net investment income increased $0.6$0.8 million, and $1.8 million, respectively, compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016,March 31, 2017, due to an increase in the size of and improved yields on our total investment portfolio.
Expenses
We recognize insurance claims and claims expenses in connection with the loss experience of our insured portfolio and incur other underwriting and operating expenses, including employee compensation and benefits, policy acquisition costs, and technology, professional services and facilities expenses, in connection with the development and operation of our business.



Insurance claims and claims expenses increased $0.3 million and $1.4$0.9 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, respectively,March 31, 2018, compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016,March 31, 2017, as a result of an increase in our NODs, primarily due todriven by new defaults on insured loans impacted by hurricanes Harvey and Irma and the California wildfires, and an increase in the overall number of policies in force year-over-yearour portfolio and expected loss developmentaging of our portfolio. The increase in claims and claims expenses for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 wasearlier book years, offset by the partial release of reserves related to prior year defaults.
Underwriting and operating expenses increased $0.6$2.5 million or 3%, and $8.7 million or 12%9% for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, respectively,March 31, 2018, compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016.March 31, 2017. Employee compensation accounts for the majority of our operating expenses. We increased the size of our workforce from 273289 employees as of September 30, 2016March 31, 2017 to 298307 employees as of September 30, 2017March 31, 2018 to support the growth of our business, particularly in our sales and operating functions. Underwriting and operating expenses for the ninethree months ended September 30,March 31, 2017, also reflect $4.8included $1.6 million of operating expenses related to the 2017 ILN Transaction and amendment ofAmendment No. 1 to the Credit Agreement.


We incurred interestInterest expense related to the Term Loan ofwas $3.4 million and $10.1 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, respectively,March 31, 2018, compared to interest expense of $3.7 million and $11.1$3.5 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively.March 31, 2017. Interest expense declined in connection with the amendment of our Credit Agreement which we completed in February 2017, which among other items, reduced the interest ratespread payable on the Term Loan. The interest expense reduction was partially offset by a rise in the underlying LIBOR rate. See Item 1, "Financial Statements - Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements - Note 4, Term Loan."
Income Tax
We aretax expense increased to $4.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2018 from $1.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017 because of the growth in our pre-tax income, partially offset by a U.S. taxpayer and are subjectdecrease in our effective tax rate. Our effective tax rate on our pre-tax income decreased to a15.7% for the three months ended March 31, 2018 from 18.5% for the three months ended March 31, 2017, primarily because the TCJA reduced the statutory U.S. federal corporate income tax rate ofto 21% for the current and all future years from 35%. Our holding company files a consolidated U.S. federal and various state income tax returns on behalf of itself and its subsidiaries.
for all prior years through December 31, 2017. Our provision for income taxes for the interim reporting periods areis established based on anour estimated annual effective tax rate for a given year. We expect our annual effective tax rate for the year ending December 31, 2017. We currently pay no regular2018 will approximate the current 21% statutory U.S. federal corporate income tax due to the forecasted utilization of federal net operating loss carryforwards, which were $122.9 million as of December 31, 2016. The interim provision for income taxes include current year alternative minimum tax and changes to deferred tax assets. Our effective tax rate on our pre-tax income was 36.9% for the three months ended September 30, 2017, compared to 1.8% for the comparable 2016 period. Our effective tax rate on our pre-tax income was 33.3% for the nine months ended September 30, 2017, compared to our effective tax rate on our pre-tax income of 2.6% for the comparable 2016 period. The difference between our statutory tax rate and our effective tax rates for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 is due to a discrete tax benefit associated with excess tax benefits for restricted stock units that were recognized during the periods as a result of the adoption of ASU 2016-09 in the prior quarter. See Item 1, "Financial Statements - Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - Note 1, Organization and Basis of Presentation - Change in Accounting Principle." We expect our effective tax rate to return to approximately the statutory tax rate for the year ending December 31, 2017. From inception through September 30, 2016, we had evaluated the realizability of our net deferred tax assets on a quarterly basis and concluded that it was more-likely-than-not that our net deferred tax assets may not be realized and recognized a full valuation allowance against net deferred tax assets.



Consolidated balance sheetsSeptember 30, 2017 
December 31, 2016 (1)
 (In Thousands)
Total investment portfolio$692,729
 $628,969
Cash and cash equivalents20,698
 47,746
Premiums receivable21,056
 13,728
Deferred policy acquisition costs, net36,101
 30,109
Software and equipment, net21,767
 20,402
Prepaid reinsurance premiums39,915
 37,921
Deferred tax asset, net38,490
 51,434
Other assets15,856
 9,588
Total assets$886,612
 $839,897
Term loan$143,969
 $144,353
Unearned premiums161,345
 152,906
Accounts payable and accrued expenses22,028
 25,297
Reserve for insurance claims and claims expenses6,123
 3,001
Reinsurance funds withheld33,105
 30,633
Deferred ceding commission4,971
 4,831
Warrant liability4,046
 3,367
Total liabilities375,587
 364,388
Total shareholders' equity511,025
 475,509
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity$886,612
 $839,897
(1) The 2016 prior period balance sheet has been revised.rate. See Item 1, "Financial Statements - Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements - Note 1, Organization and Basis of Presentation. Immaterial Correction of Prior Period Amounts" 9, Income Taxes.for further details."
Consolidated balance sheetsMarch 31, 2018 December 31, 2017
 (In Thousands)
Total investment portfolio$723,790
 $715,875
Cash and cash equivalents101,890
 19,196
Premiums receivable28,164
 25,179
Deferred policy acquisition costs, net40,026
 37,925
Software and equipment, net22,857
 22,802
Prepaid reinsurance premiums38,557
 40,250
Deferred tax asset, net16,343
 19,929
Other assets15,964
 13,692
Total assets$987,591
 $894,848
Term loan$143,868
 $143,882
Unearned premiums165,590
 163,166
Accounts payable and accrued expenses21,218
 23,364
Reserve for insurance claims and claims expenses10,391
 8,761
Reinsurance funds withheld33,179
 34,102
Deferred ceding commission4,838
 5,024
Warrant liability6,563
 7,472
Total liabilities385,647
 385,771
Total shareholders' equity601,944
 509,077
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity$987,591
 $894,848
As of September 30, 2017,March 31, 2018, we had approximately $713.4$825.7 million in cash and investments, including $61.7$123.0 million held at NMIH. The increase in cash and cash equivalents and investments from year-end 2016December 31, 2017 primarily relates to net proceeds of approximately $79.2 million from the common stock offering completed in March 2018 and cash generated from operations.
Premiums receivable was $28.2 million as of March 31, 2018, compared to $25.2 million as of December 31, 2017. The increase was primarily driven by the increase in our monthly premium policies in force, where premiums are generally paid one month in arrears.
Net deferred policy acquisition costs were $36.1$40.0 million as of September 30, 2017,March 31, 2018, compared to $30.1$37.9 million at December 31, 2016.2017. The increase was driven by growth in the number of policies written during the period ended March 31, 2018 and the deferment of certain costs associated with polices written during the nine months ended September 30, 2017,origination of those policies, partially offset by the amortization of previously deferred acquisition costs and the capitalization of ceding commissions associated with the 2016 QSR Transaction during the period.
Prepaid reinsurance premiums were $38.6 million as of March 31, 2018, compared to $40.3 million as of December 31, 2017. The prepaid reinsurance premiums balance represents the ceded unearned premiums reserve on the single premium policies under the 2016 QSR Transaction. The reinsurance coverage period of the 2016 QSR Transaction ended for new premiums written


as of December 31, 2017, and under our 2018 QSR Transaction we ceded premiums on an earned basis. Consequently, we did not cede any unearned premium reserves on single premium policies with coverage effective dates on or after January 1, 2018. The decrease in prepaid reinsurance premiums reflects the amortization of the unearned premium balance on single premium policies ceded under the 2016 QSR Transaction through December 31, 2017.
Unearned premiums increased $8.4$2.4 million to $161.3$165.6 million as of September 30, 2017,March 31, 2018, primarily due to single premium policy origination during the period, offset by the amortization through earnings of existing unearned premiums in accordance with the expiration of risk on the related policies and the cancellation of other single premium policies.
OtherNet deferred tax assets balance increased $6.3 milliondecreased to $15.9$16.3 million as of September 30,March 31, 2018, from $19.9 million at December 31, 2017, primarily due to $3.3 millionthe utilization of pending proceeds fromnet operating loss carryforwards during the saleperiod. For further information regarding income taxes and their impact on our results of short-term investments in Septemberoperations and a $1.2 million increase in accrued investment income as a result of an increase in the size of our investment portfolio.financial position, see Item 1, "Financial Statements - Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements - Note 9, Income Taxes."
Accounts payable and accrued expenses decreased to $22.0$21.2 million as of September 30, 2017,March 31, 2018, from $25.3$23.4 million at December 31, 2016.2017. The balance consistsdecrease was driven by the payment, during the first quarter of 2018, of bonuses accrued at year end. The decrease was partially offset by unsettled payments from the purchase of certain securities.
Reserve for insurance claims and claim expenses increased $1.6 million to be paid within the next 12 months and decreased as a result of lower operating accruals and lower accrued interest$10.4 million at March 31, 2018, primarily due to a lower interest rate on the Term Loan.an increase in our ending default inventory. See "- Insurance Claims and Claims Expenses," abovefor further details.
Reinsurance funds withheld was $33.1$33.2 million as of September 30, 2017,March 31, 2018, representing the net of our ceded reinsurance premiums written, less our profit and ceding commission receivables related tounder the 2016 QSR Transaction. The increasedecrease in reinsurance funds withheld of $2.5$0.9 million from December 31, 2016,2017, was a result of increaseda decline in ceded premiums written.written due to the end of the effective reinsurance coverage period of the 2016 QSR Transaction at December 31, 2017. See, Item 1, "Financial Statements - Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements - Note 5, Reinsurance."


Warrant liability decreased to $6.6 million at March 31, 2018, compared to $7.5 million at December 31, 2017, primarily due to the decrease in our common stock price during the period, with additional impact related to changes in the Black-Scholes model inputs and exercises of outstanding warrants.  For further information regarding valuation of our warrant liability and their impact on our results of operations and financial position, see Item 1, "Financial Statements - Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements - Note 3, Fair Value of Financial Instruments."
The following table summarizes our consolidated cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities:activities.
Consolidated cash flowsFor the nine months ended September 30,For the three months ended March 31,
2017 20162018 2017
Net cash (used in) provided by:(In Thousands)
Net cash provided by (used in) :(In Thousands)
Operating activities$41,778
 $52,212
$21,131
 $(2,089)
Investing activities(66,553) (63,714)(16,570) (31,258)
Financing activities(2,273) (1,293)78,133
 (1,856)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents$(27,048) $(12,795)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents$82,694
 $(35,203)
Net cash provided by operating activities was $41.8$21.1 million for the ninethree months ended September 30, 2017,March 31, 2018, compared to $52.2cash used in operating activities of $2.1 million in the same period in 2016.three months ended March 31, 2017. The decreaseincrease in cash generated from operating activities was primarily causeddriven by growth in premiums written, partially offset by increased operating expenses in connection with employee compensation and benefitsbenefit costs, andas well as higher claims paid due to an increase in our default inventory offset by growth in net premiums written.inventory.
Cash used in investing activities for the periods presented was driven by the purchase of fixed and short-term maturities during those periods. The cash outflow was lower by $14.7 million in the three months ended March 31, 2018 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2017 due to the timing of reinvestment activities across period end.
The $1Cash provided by financing activities was $78.1 million increase infor the three months ended March 31, 2018, compared to cash used in financing activities of $1.9 million for the ninethree months ended September 30, 2017 comparedMarch 31, 2017. The increase related to the same period ended September 30, 2016, was primarily due to ancash proceeds of $79.2 million raised in our common stock offering completed in March 2018, partially offset by the increase in taxes paid related toon the net share settlement of employee equity awards.


Holding Company Liquidity and Capital Resources
NMIH serves as the holding company for our insurance subsidiaries and does not have any significant operations of its own. NMIH's principal liquidity demands include funds for: (i) payment of certain corporate expenses; (ii) payment of certain reimbursable expenses of its insurance subsidiaries; (iii) payment of principal and interest related to the Term Loan; (iv) tax payments to the Internal Revenue Service; (v) capital support for its subsidiaries; and (vi) payment of dividends, if any, on its common stock. NMIH is not subject to any limitations on its ability to pay dividends except those generally applicable to corporations, such as NMIH, that are incorporated in Delaware. Delaware corporation law provides that dividends are only payable out of a corporation's surplus or recent net profits (subject to certain limitations).
As of September 30, 2017,March 31, 2018, NMIH had $61.7$123.0 million of cash and investments. NMIH's principal source of operating cash is investment income and in the future could include dividends from NMIC, if available and permitted under law and by the GSEs.
In March 2018, NMIH completed the sale of 4.3 million shares of common stock, including the exercise of a 15% overallotment option to purchase additional shares, and raised proceeds of approximately $79.2 million, net of underwriting discounts, commissions and other direct offering expenses. In April, 2018, NMIH made a capital contribution of $70 million to NMIC.
NMIH has entered into tax and expense-sharing agreements with its subsidiaries which have been approved by the Wisconsin OCI, but such approval may be changed or revoked at any time. With the Wisconsin OCI's approval, NMIH began allocating the interest expense on its Term Loan to NMIC in the first quarter of 2017, consistent with the benefits NMIC received when NMIH down-streamed the loan proceeds to NMIC.
NMIC'sOur insurance subsidiaries' ability to pay dividends to NMIH is subject to insurance department notice or approval. Under Wisconsin law, NMICthe insurance companies may pay dividends up to specified levels (i.e.(i.e., "ordinary" dividends) with 30 days' prior notice to the Wisconsin OCI. Dividends in larger amounts, or "extraordinary" dividends, are subject to the Wisconsin OCI's prior approval. Under Wisconsin insurance laws, an extraordinary dividend is defined as any payment or distribution that together with other dividends and distributions made within the preceding 12 months exceeds the lesser of (i) 10% of the insurer’sinsurer's statutory policyholders' surplus as of the preceding December 31 or (ii) adjusted statutory net income for the 12-month period ending the precedingpreceeding December 31.
NMIC has never paid any dividends to NMIH. NMIC reported a statutory net loss for the twelve12 months ended December 31, 20162017 and currently cannot pay any dividends to NMIH through December 31, 2018 without the prior approval of the Wisconsin OCI. Re One has never paid dividends to NMIH. Re One currently has the capacity to pay ordinary dividends of $505 thousand to NMIH. Certain other states in which NMIC isand Re One are licensed also have statutes or regulations that restrict itstheir ability to pay dividends.

NMIC's capital needs depend on many factors including its ability to successfully write new business, establish premium rates at levels sufficient to cover claims and operating costs and meet minimum required asset thresholds under the PMIERs and state capital requirements. NMIC's capital needs also depend on its decision to access the reinsurance markets. NMIH may require liquidity to fund the capital needs of its insurance subsidiaries.


In November 2015, NMIH entered into the Credit Agreement for the Term Loan. On February 10, 2017, NMIH amended the Credit Agreement (Amendment No. 1) to reduce the interest rate and extend the maturity date of the Term Loan from November 10, 2018 to November 10, 2019. The amended Term Loan bears interest at the Eurodollar Rate, as defined in the Credit Agreement and subject to a 1.00% floor, plus an annual margin rate of 6.75%, payable monthly or quarterly based on our interest rate election. On October 25, 2017, NMIH further amended the Credit Agreement (Amendment No. 2) to remove a covenant that required NMIH to maintain liquidity (as defined therein) in an aggregate amount no less than all remaining interest payments due under the Term Loan. As modified by Amendment No. 2, the Credit Agreement retains the requirement that NMIH maintain liquidity in an aggregate amount no less than the sum of all remaining principal amortization payments due under the Term Loan, excluding principal scheduled to be paid on its maturity date, determined to be $2.3 million as of March 31, 2018. The Credit Agreement contains variousother restrictive covenants and required financial ratios and tests (which were not modified by Amendment No. 1)Amendments No.1 or No.2) that we are required to meet or maintain. TheseThe current covenants include, but are not limited to the following: a maximum debt-to-total capitalization ratio (as defined therein) of 35%, maximum RTC ratio of 22.0:1.0, minimum liquidity (as modified by Amendment No. 2 and defined therein) of $27.4 million as of September 30, 2017,, compliance with the PMIERs financial requirements (subject to any GSE-approved waivers), and minimum shareholders' equity requirements. In October 2017, NMIH further amended the Credit Agreement to remove a covenant that required NMIH to maintain liquidity (as defined therein) in an aggregate amount no less than all remaining interest payments due under the Term Loan, while retaining the requirement to maintain minimum liquidity (as defined therein) in an amount no less than all remaining principle amortization payments due under the Term Loan, estimated to be $3 million as of the date of this report (not including the amount due at the maturity date).


Consolidated Investment Portfolio
Our primary objectives with respect to our investment portfolio are to preserve capital and generate investment income, while maintaining sufficient liquidity to cover our operating needs. We aim to achieve diversification as toby type, quality, maturity, industry, and issuer that maximizes the after-tax return on investments.industry. We have adopted an investment policy that defines, among other things, eligible and ineligible investments, concentration limits for asset types, industry sectors, single issuers, and certain credit ratings, and benchmarks for asset duration.
Substantially all of our investment portfolio is held in fixed maturity instruments. As of September 30, 2017,March 31, 2018, the fair value of our investment portfolio was $692.7$723.8 million. We also had an additional $20.7$101.9 million of cash and equivalents as of September 30, 2017.March 31, 2018. Pre-tax book yield on the portfolio for the ninethree months ended September 30, 2017March 31, 2018 was 2.3%2.4%. The book yield is calculated as period-to-date net investment income divided by the average amortized cost of the investment portfolio. Yield on the investment portfolio is likely to change over time based on movements in interest rates, the duration or mix of our investment portfolio and other factors.
The following tables present a breakdown of our investment portfolio and cash and cash equivalents by investment type and credit rating:rating.
Percentage of portfolio's fair valueSeptember 30, 2017 December 31, 2016
1.Corporate debt securities57% 52%
2.U.S. treasury securities and obligations of U.S. government agencies9
 9
3.Asset-backed securities14
 17
4.Cash, cash equivalents, and short-term investments7
 16
5.Municipal debt securities13
 6
 Total100% 100%
The ratings of our investment portfolio were:
Percentage of portfolio's fair valueMarch 31, 2018 December 31, 2017
Corporate debt securities54% 59%
Asset-backed securities15
 14
Cash, cash equivalents, and short-term investments13
 6
Municipal debt securities11
 12
U.S. treasury securities and obligations of U.S. government agencies7
 9
Total100% 100%
Investment portfolio ratings at fair value(1)September 30, 2017 December 31, 2016March 31, 2018 December 31, 2017
AAA19% 24%27% 21%
AA(1)(2)
21
 19
18
 19
A(1)(2)
45
 44
40
 46
BBB(1)(2)
15
 13
15
 14
Total100% 100%100% 100%
(1) IncludeExcluded certain operating cash accounts.
(2) Includes +/– ratings.

The ratings above are provided by one or more of: Moody's, S&P and Fitch Ratings. If three ratings are available, we assign the middle rating for classification purposes, otherwise we assign the lowest rating.


Other Items
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Contractual Obligations
We had no material off-balance sheet arrangements as of September 30, 2017.March 31, 2018. In connection with the 2017 ILN Transaction, we have certain future contractual commitments to Oaktown Re, a special purpose VIE that is not consolidated in our financial results. See Item 1, "Financial Statements - Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements - Note 1, Organization and Basis of Presentation - Variable interest entity" and"Note 5, Reinsurance."
There are no material changes outside the ordinary course of business in the contractual obligations specified in our 2016 10-K.
Critical Accounting Estimates
We use accounting principles and methods that conform to GAAP. Where GAAP specifically excludes mortgage insurance we follow general industry practices. We are required to apply significant judgment and make material estimates in the preparation of our financial statements and with regard to various accounting, reporting and disclosure matters. Assumptions and estimates are required to apply these principles where actual measurement is not possible or practical. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates and assumptions. Our actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
We believe that the assumptions and estimates associated with revenue recognition, fair value measurements, our investment portfolio, deferred policy acquisition costs, premium deficiency reserves, income taxes, reserves for insurance claims and claims expenses, warrants and share-based compensation have the greatest potential impact on our consolidated financial statements. Therefore, we consider these to be our critical accounting estimates. There have been no material changes to our critical accounting policies and estimates as compared to the critical accounting policies and estimates described in our 20162017 10-K.


Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
We own and manage a large portfolio of various holdings, types and maturities. NMIH's principal source of operating cash is investment income. The assets within the investment portfolio are exposed to the same factors that affect overall financial market performance.
We manage market risk via a defined investment policy implemented by our treasury function with oversight from our Board of Director's Risk Committee. Important drivers of our market risk exposure monitored and managed by us include but are not limited to:
Changes to the level of interest rates. Increasing interest rates may reduce the value of certain fixed-rate bonds held in the investment portfolio. Higher rates may cause variable rate assets to generate additional income. Decreasing rates will have the reverse impact. Significant changes in interest rates can also affect persistency and claim rates of our insurance portfolio, and as a result we may determine that our investment portfolio needs to be restructured to better align it with future liabilities and claim payments. Such restructuring may cause investments to be liquidated when market conditions are adverse. Additionally, the changes in Eurodollar based interest rates affect the interest expense related to the Company's debt.
Changes to the term structure of interest rates. Rising or falling rates typically change by different amounts along the yield curve. These changes may have unforeseen impacts on the value of certain assets.
Market volatility/changes in the real or perceived credit quality of investments. Deterioration in the quality of investments, identified through changes to our own or third party (e.g., rating agency) assessments, will reduce the value and potentially the liquidity of investments.
Concentration Risk. If the investment portfolio is highly concentrated in one asset, or in multiple assets whose values are highly correlated, the value of the total portfolio may be greatly affected by the change in value of just one asset or a group of highly correlated assets.
Prepayment Risk. Bonds may have call provisions that permit debtors to repay prior to maturity when it is to their advantage. This typically occurs when rates fall below the interest rate of the debt.
The carrying value of our investment portfolio as of September 30, 2017March 31, 2018 and December 31, 20162017 was $693$724 million and $629$716 million, respectively, of which 100% was invested in fixed maturity securities. The primary market risk to our investment portfolio is interest rate risk associated with investments in fixed maturity securities. We mitigate the market risk associated with our fixed maturity securities portfolio by matching the duration of our fixed maturity securities with the expected duration of the liabilities that those securities are intended to support.
As of September 30, 2017,March 31, 2018, the duration of our fixed income portfolio, including cash and cash equivalents, was 3.953.39 years, which means that an instantaneous parallel shift (movement up or down) in the yield curve of 100 basis points would result in a change of 3.95%3.39% in fair value of our fixed income portfolio. Excluding cash, our fixed income portfolio duration was 4.133.78 years, which means that an instantaneous parallel shift (movement up or down) in the yield curve of 100 basis points would result in a change of 4.13%3.78% in fair value of our fixed income portfolio.
We are also subject to market risk related to our Term Loan and 2017 ILN Transaction. As discussed in Item 1, "Financial Statements - Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements - Note 4, Term Loan," the Term Loan bears interest at a variable rate and, as a result, increases in market interest rates would generally result in increased interest expense on our outstanding principal.
The risk premium amounts under the 2017 ILN Transaction are calculated by multiplying the outstanding reinsurance coverage amount at the beginning of any payment period by a coupon rate, which is the sum of 1-month LIBOR and a risk margin, and then subtracting actual investment income earned on the trust balance during that payment period. An increase in 1-month LIBOR rates would generally increase the risk premium payments, while an increase to money market rates, which directly affect investment income earned on the trust balance, would generally decrease them. Although we expect the two rates to move in tandem, to the extent they do not, it could increase or decrease the risk premium payments that otherwise would be due.


Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our PrincipalChief Executive Officer and PrincipalChief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Our management, including our PrincipalChief Executive Officer and PrincipalChief Financial Officer, conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Exchange Act) as of September 30, 2017,March 31, 2018 pursuant to Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act. Management applied its judgment in assessing the costs and benefits of such controls and procedures, which by their nature, can provide only reasonable assurance regarding management's control objectives. Management does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures will prevent or detect all errors and fraud. A control system, irrespective of how well it is designed and operated, can only provide reasonable assurance and cannot guarantee that it will succeed in its stated objectives.
Based upon that evaluation, our PrincipalChief Executive Officer and PrincipalChief Financial Officer concluded that, as of September 30, 2017,March 31, 2018 our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective due to provide reasonable assurance that the existence of a material weaknessinformation required to be disclosed by us in the design and operating effectiveness of an internal control related to reconciliation support used to validate our deferred tax inventory. A material weakness is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected in a timely basis. As described in Item 1, "Financial Statements - Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - Note 1, Organization and Basis of Presentation - Immaterial Correction of Prior Period Amounts," above, we detected a $1.8 million error in the deferred tax balance that was immaterial to the 2016 financial statements. Notwithstanding the material weakness identified, our management has concluded that the consolidated financial statements included in this Form 10-Q fairly present, in all material respects, our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows at and for the periods presented. In addition, there were no material errors in our financial results or balances identified as a result of this control deficiency, and accordingly, amendment of our 2016 Form 10-K is not required.
We enhanced existing controls and designed and implemented new controls applicable to our deferred tax accounting, including those related to stock compensation, to ensure that our DTA is accurately calculated and appropriately reflected in our financial statements and reports we file withor submit under the SEC. We believe these actions are sufficient to remediateExchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the identified material weaknesstime periods specified in the SEC's rules and strengthen our internal control over financial reporting; however, there can be no guarantee that such remediation will be sufficient. We will continue to monitor the effectiveness of our controls and will make any further changes management determines appropriate.forms.
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Other than noted above, there wereThere was no changeschange in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this report that havehas materially affected, or areis reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.



PART II
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
Certain lawsuits and claims arising in the ordinary course of business may be filed or pending against us or our affiliates from time to time. In accordance with applicable accounting guidance, we establish accruals for all lawsuits, claims and expected settlements when we believe it is probable that a loss has been incurred and the amount of the loss is reasonably estimable. When a loss contingency is not both probable and estimable, we do not establish an accrual. Any such loss estimates are inherently uncertain, based on currently available information and are subject to management’s judgment and various assumptions. Due to the inherent subjectivity of these estimates and unpredictability of outcomes of legal proceedings, any amounts accrued may not represent the ultimate resolution of such matters.
To the extent we believe any potential loss relating to such lawsuits and claims may have a material impact on our liquidity, consolidated financial position, results of operations, and/or our business as a whole and is reasonably possible but not probable, we disclose information relating to any such potential loss, whether in excess of any established accruals or where there is no established accrual. We also disclose information relating to any material potential loss that is probable but not reasonably estimable. Where reasonably practicable, we will provide an estimate of loss or range of potential loss. No disclosures are generally made for any loss contingencies that are deemed to be remote.
Based upon information available to us and our review of lawsuits and claims filed or pending against us to date, we have not recognized a material accrual liability for these matters, nor do we currently expect it is reasonably possible that these matters will result in a material liability to the Company. However, the outcome of litigation and other legal and regulatory matters is inherently uncertain, and it is possible that one or more of such matters currently pending or threatened could have an unanticipated material adverse effect on our liquidity, consolidated financial position, results of operations, and/or our business as a whole, in the future.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Risk factors that affect our business and financial results are discussed in Part I, Item 1A of our 20162017 10-K. As of the date of this report, other than as included below, we are not aware of any material changes in our risk factors from the risk factors disclosed in our 20162017 10-K. You should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described herein and in our 20162017 10-K, which have the potential to affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows or prospects in a material and adverse manner. The risks described herein and in our 20162017 10-K are not the only risks we face, as there are additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial which may in the future adversely affect our business, financial condition and/or operating results.
We face intense competition for business in our industry from existing private MI providers and potentially from new entrants. If we are unable to compete effectively, we may not be able to achieve our business goals, which would adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.
The MI industry is highly competitive. With six private MI companies actively competing for business from the same residential mortgage originators, it is important that we continue to differentiate ourselves from the other mortgage insurers, each of which sells substantially similar products to ours. We compete with other private mortgage insurers based on our terms of coverage, underwriting guidelines, pricing, customer service (including speed of MI underwriting and decisions), availability of ancillary products and services (including training and loan review services), financial strength, information security, customer relationships, name recognition and reputation, the strength of management teams and sales organizations, the effective use of technology, and innovation in the delivery and servicing of insurance products.
One or more of our competitors may seek to capture increased market share from the public MIs, such as the FHA or VA, or from other private mortgage insurers by reducing prices, offering alternative coverage and product options, including offerings for loans not intended to be sold to the GSEs, loosening their underwriting guidelines or relaxing risk management policies, which could, in turn, improve their competitive positions in the industry and negatively impact our ability to achieve our business goals. Competition within the private mortgage insurance industry could result in our loss of customers, lower premiums, riskier credit guidelines and other changes that could lower our revenues or increase our expenses. If our information technology systems are inferior to our competitors', existing and potential customers may choose our competitors' products over ours. If we are unable to compete effectively against our competitors and attract and retain our target customers, our revenue may be adversely impacted, which could adversely impact our growth and profitability.
In addition, we and most of our competitors, either directly or indirectly, offer certain ancillary services to mortgage lenders with which we also conduct MI business, including loan review, training and other services. For various reasons, including those


related to resources or compliance, we may choose not to offer these services at all or not to offer them in a form or to the extent that is similar to the prevailing offerings of our competitors. If we choose not to offer these services, or if we were to offer ancillary services that are not well-received by the market and fail to perform as anticipated, we could be at a competitive disadvantage which could adversely impact our profitability.
Certain of our competitors are subsidiaries of larger and more diversified corporations that may have access to greater amounts of capital and financial resources than we do, or at a lower cost of capital, and some have better financial strength ratings than we have. As a result, they may be better positioned to compete in and outside of the traditional MI market, including when the GSEs pursue alternative forms of credit enhancement other than private MI. In particular, Freddie Mac recently commenced piloting a new credit risk transfer program under which it purchases high-LTV loans (i.e., LTVs above 80%) without MI and subsequently places mortgage insurance with a captive insurer controlled by one of our competitors, which captive in turn cedes 100% of the risk to a panel of offshore reinsurers (Freddie Mac calls the program IMAGIN). There have been media reports that Fannie Mae is considering a similar initiative. Although IMAGIN is currently in the pilot phase, we believe it competes with traditional LPMI products offered by private MI companies, including ours, and may gain traction in the market if, and to the extent, IMAGIN pricing is lower than prevailing LPMI rates and features of the IMAGIN offering cause originators and the GSEs to materially modify their historical preference for private MI as credit enhancement on high-LTV loans. In addition, the pricing of IMAGIN and competing LPMI products may allow these products to begin to impinge on BPMI market share, or may cause MIs, including NMIC, to reduce BPMI rates to deter this from occurring.
Our financial strength ratings may remain important for our customers to maintain confidence in our products and our competitive position. A downgrade in NMIC's ratings or ratings outlook could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and operating results, including (i) increased scrutiny of our financial condition by our customers, resulting in potential reduction in our NIW or (ii) negative impacts to our ability to conduct business in the non-GSE mortgage market, where financial strength ratings may be more important for such lenders. In addition, although financial strength ratings are not a requirement to remain an Approved Insurer under the current PMIERs framework, they may play a greater role to the extent GSEs use forms of credit enhancement other than traditional MI, including use of deeper MI coverage or other forms of credit risk transfer.
The amount of insurance we may be able to write could be adversely affected if lenders and investors select alternatives to private MI.
If lenders and investors select alternatives to private MI on high-LTV loans, our business could be adversely affected. These alternatives to private MI include, but are not limited to:
lenders using government mortgage insurance programs, including those of the FHA and the VA, and state-supported mortgage insurance funds in several states, including Massachusetts and California;
lenders and other investors holding mortgages in portfolio and self-insuring;
GSEs and other investors using credit enhancements other than MI (including alternative forms of credit risk transfer such as IMAGIN), using other credit enhancements in conjunction with reduced levels of MI coverage, or accepting credit risk without credit enhancement;
lenders originating mortgages using "piggy-back" or other structures to avoid MI, such as a first mortgage with an 80% LTV and a second mortgage with a 10%, 15% or 20% LTV (referred to as 80-10-10, 80-15-5 or 80-20 loans, respectively) rather than a first mortgage with an LTV above 80% that has MI; and
borrowers paying cash or making large down payments versus securing mortgage financing, which has occurred with greater frequency in the years following the most recent financial crisis.
Any of these alternatives to private MI could reduce or eliminate the need for our products, could cause us to lose business and/or could limit our ability to attract the business that we would prefer to insure.
Further, at the direction of the FHFA, the GSEs have expanded their credit and mortgage risk transfer programs. These programs have included the use of structured finance vehicles, obtaining insurance from non-mortgage insurers (e.g., IMAGIN), including off-shore reinsurance, engaging in credit-linked note transactions in the capital markets, or using other forms of debt issuances or securitizations that transfer credit risk directly to other investors. The growing success of these programs and the perception that some of these risk-sharing structures have beneficial features in comparison to private MI (e.g., lower costs, reduced counter-party risk due to collateral requirements or more diversified insurance exposures) may create increased competition for private MI on loans traditionally sold to the GSEs with private MI.
Beginning in 2008, the public MIs, principally the FHA and VA, significantly expanded their role in the MI market as incumbent private mortgage insurers came under significant financial stress. While declining from peak market share following the


most recent financial crisis, the market share of the public MIs remains substantially above their historically low market share prior to 2008. Government mortgage insurance programs are not subject to the same capital requirements, costs of capital, risk tolerance or business objectives that we and other private mortgage insurers are, and therefore, generally have greater financial flexibility in setting their pricing, guidelines and capacity, which could put us at a competitive disadvantage. Although there has been broad policy consensus toward the need for private capital to play a larger role and government credit risk to be reduced in the U.S. housing finance system, it remains difficult to predict whether the combined market share of the public MIs will recede to historical levels. These agencies may continue to maintain a strong combined market position and could increase their market share in the future.
Factors that could cause government-supported mortgage insurance programs to remain significant include:
federal housing policy, including future premium reductions or loosening of underwriting guidelines;
increases in premium rates or tightening of underwriting guidelines by private mortgage insurers;
capital constraints in the private MI industry;
increase in capital requirements imposed on private mortgage insurers by the GSEs or states;
continuation of increases to or imposition of new GSE loan delivery fees on loans that require MI, which may result in higher borrower costs for MI loans compared to loans insured by public MIs;
loans insured under federal government-supported mortgage insurance programs are eligible for securitization in Ginnie Mae securities, which may be viewed by investors as more desirable than GSE securities due to the explicit backing of Ginnie Mae securities by the full faith and credit of the U.S. federal government;
difference in the spread between GSE mortgage-backed securities and Ginnie Mae mortgage-backed securities;
increase in public MIs' loan limits above GSE loan limits; and
perceived operational ease of using insurance from public MIs compared to private MI.
If the public MIs maintain or increase their share of the mortgage insurance market, our business and industry could be negatively affected.
The degree to which lenders or borrowers may select these alternatives now, or in the future, is difficult to predict. As one or more of the alternatives described above, or new alternatives that enter the market, are chosen over MI, our revenues could be adversely impacted. The loss of business in general or the specific loss of more profitable business could have a material adverse effect on our financial position and operating results.
Changes in the business practices of the GSEs, including a decision to decrease or discontinue the use of private MI, federal legislation that changes their charters or a restructuring of the GSEs could reduce our revenues or increase our losses.
The requirements and practices of the GSEs impact the operating results and financial performance of GSE-approved private mortgage insurers. Changes in the charters or business practices of Freddie Mac or Fannie Mae could reduce the number of mortgages they purchase that are insured by us and consequently diminish our franchise value. The GSEs could be directed to make such changes by the FHFA, which was appointed as their conservator in September 2008 and has the authority to control and direct the operations of the GSEs.
With the GSEs in a prolonged conservatorship, there has been ongoing debate over the future role and purpose of the GSEs in the U.S. housing market. The U.S. Congress may legislate structural and other changes to the GSEs and the functioning of the secondary mortgage market. Since 2011, there have been numerous legislative proposals intended to incrementally scale back the GSEs (such as a statutory mandate for the GSEs to transfer mortgage credit risk to the private sector) or to completely reform the housing finance system. Congress, however, has not enacted any legislation to date. The proposals vary greatly with regard to the government's role in the housing market, and more specifically, with regard to the existence of an explicit or implicit government guarantee. If any GSE reform legislation is enacted, it could impact the current role of private mortgage insurance as credit enhancement, including its reduction or elimination, which would have an adverse effect on our revenue, operating results, prospects or financial condition. As a result of these matters, it is uncertain what role private capital, including MI, will play in the domestic residential housing finance system in the future or the impact of any such changes on our business. In addition, the timing of the impact on our business is uncertain. Any changes to the charters or statutory authorities of the GSEs would require Congressional action to implement. Passage and timing of any comprehensive GSE reform legislation or incremental change is uncertain and could change through the legislative process, which could take time, making the actual impact on us and our industry difficult to predict. With the current administration and Republican majority in Congress (including the resulting control of key committees addressing GSE reform), there is a possibility for greater consensus, although much uncertainty remains regarding the details of any reform as well as when it would be enacted or implemented. Any such changes that come to pass could have a significant impact on our business.


In recent years, the FHFA has set goals for the GSEs to transfer significant portions of the GSEs' mortgage credit risk to the private sector. To date, several credit risk transfer products have been created under the program, including IMAGIN and others discussed above in "The amount of insurance we may be able to write could be adversely affected if lenders and investors select alternatives to private MI." To the extent these credit risk products evolve in a manner that displaces primary MI coverage, the amount of insurance we write may be reduced. It is difficult to predict the impact of alternative credit risk transfer products, if any, that are developed to meet the goals established by the FHFA.
Item 6. Exhibits
An index to exhibits has been filed as part of this report and is incorporated herein by reference.



SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
 

NMI HOLDINGS, INC.
NovemberMay 1, 20172018


By: /s/ Adam Pollitzer
 
     Name: Adam Pollitzer
     Title: Chief Financial Officer and Duly Authorized Signatory



EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit Number Description
   
2.1 
Stock Purchase Agreement, dated November 30, 2011, between NMI Holdings, Inc. and MAC Financial Ltd. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to our Form S-1 Registration Statement (Registration No. 333-191635), filed on October 9, 2013)
2.2 
Amendment to Stock Purchase Agreement, dated April 6, 2012, between NMI Holdings, Inc. and MAC Financial Ltd. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.2 to our Form S-1 Registration Statement (Registration No. 333-191635), filed on October 9, 2013)
3.1 
Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to our Form S-1 Registration Statement (Registration No. 333-191635), filed on October 9, 2013)
3.2 
Third Amended and Restated By-Laws (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to our Form 8-K, filed on December 9, 2014)
4.1 
Specimen Class A common stock certificate (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to our Form S-1 Registration Statement (Registration No. 333-191635), filed on October 9, 2013)
4.2 
Registration Rights Agreement between NMI Holdings, Inc. and FBR Capital Markets & Co., dated April 24, 2012 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to our Form S-1 Registration Statement (Registration No. 333-191635), filed on October 9, 2013)
4.3 
Registration Rights Agreement by and between MAC Financial Ltd. and NMI Holdings, Inc., dated April 24, 2012 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to our Form S-1 Registration Statement (Registration No. 333-191635), filed on October 9, 2013)
4.4 
Registration Rights Agreement between FBR & Co., FBR Capital Markets LT, Inc., FBR Capital Markets & Co., FBR Capital Markets PT, Inc. and NMI Holdings, Inc., dated April 24, 2012 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to our Form S-1 Registration Statement (Registration No. 333-191635), filed on October 9, 2013)
4.5 
Warrant No. 1 to Purchase Common Stock of NMI Holdings, Inc. issued to FBR Capital Markets & Co., dated June 13, 2013 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to our Form S-1 Registration Statement (Registration No. 333-191635), filed on October 9, 2013)
4.6 
Form of Warrant to Purchase Common Stock of NMI Holdings, Inc. issued to former stockholders of MAC Financial Ltd. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.6 to our Form S-1 Registration Statement (Registration No. 333-191635), filed on October 9, 2013)
10.1 ~ 
NMI Holdings Inc. 2012 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Form S-1 Registration Statement (registration No. 333-191635), filed on October 9, 2013)
10.2 ~ 
Form of NMI Holdings, Inc. 2012 Stock Incentive Plan Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement for Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to our Form S-1 Registration Statement (Registration No. 333-191635), filed on October 9, 2013)
10.3 ~ 
Form of NMI Holdings, Inc. 2012 Stock Incentive Plan Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement for Management (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to our Form S-1 Registration Statement (Registration No. 333-191635), filed on October 9, 2013)
10.4 ~ 
Form of NMI Holdings, Inc. 2012 Stock Incentive Plan Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement for Directors (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to our Form S-1 Registration Statement (Registration No. 333-191635), filed on October 9, 2013)
10.5 ~ 
Form of NMI Holdings, Inc. 2012 Stock Incentive Plan Nonqualified Stock Option Award Agreement for Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to our Form S-1 Registration Statement (Registration No. 333-191635), filed on October 9, 2013)
10.6 ~ 
Form of NMI Holdings, Inc. 2012 Stock Incentive Plan Nonqualified Stock Option Award Agreement for Management (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to our Form S-1 Registration Statement (Registration No. 333-191635), filed on October 9, 2013)
10.7 ~ 
Form of NMI Holdings, Inc. 2012 Stock Incentive Plan Nonqualified Stock Option Award Agreement for Directors (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to our Form S-1 Registration Statement (Registration No. 333-191635), filed on October 9, 2013)
10.8 ~ 
10.9 ~ 
Form of NMI Holdings, Inc. 2012 Stock Incentive Plan Nonqualified Stock Option Award Agreement for Employees  (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to our Form 10-K, filed on February 17, 2017)
10.10 ~ 
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement by and between NMI Holdings, Inc. and Bradley M. Shuster, dated December 23, 2015 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Form 8-K, filed on December 29, 2015)

i



10.11 ~ 
Offer Letter by and between NMI Holdings, Inc. and Glenn Farrell, effective December 4, 2014 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Form 8-K, filed on December 9, 2014)
10.12 ~
Offer Letter by and between NMI Holdings, Inc. and William Leatherberry, dated July 11, 2014 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to our Form 10-Q, filed on April 28, 2016)
10.1310.12 ~ 
Offer Letter by and between NMI Holdings, Inc. and Adam Pollitzer, dated February 1, 2017 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Form 8-K, filed on February 3, 2017)
10.1410.13 ~ 
Form of Indemnification Agreement between NMI Holdings, Inc. and its directors and certain executive officers (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Form 8-K, filed on November 25, 2014)
10.1510.14 + 
10.1610.15 
10.1710.16 
10.1810.17 
10.1910.18 ~ 
NMI Holdings, Inc. Amended and Restated 2014 Omnibus Incentive Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Appendix A to our 2017 Annual Proxy Statement, filed on March 30, 2017)
10.2010.19 ~

 
Form of NMI Holdings, Inc. Amended and Restated 2014 Omnibus Incentive Plan Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement for Chief Executive Officer (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to our Form 10-Q filed on August 1, 2017)
10.2110.20 ~ 
Form of NMI Holdings, Inc. Amended and Restated 2014 Omnibus Incentive Plan Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement for Executive Officers (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to our Form 10-Q filed on August 1, 2017)
10.2210.21 ~ 
Form of NMI Holdings, Inc. Amended and Restated 2014 Omnibus Incentive Plan Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement for Employees (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to our Form 10-Q filed on August 1, 2017)
10.2310.22 ~

 
Form of NMI Holdings, Inc. Amended and Restated 2014 Omnibus Incentive Plan Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement for Independent Directors (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to our Form 10-Q filed on August 1, 2017)
10.2410.23 ~ 
10.2510.24 ~

 
10.2610.25 ~ 
Form of NMI Holdings, Inc. 2014 Omnibus Incentive Plan Phantom Unit Award Agreement for Independent Directors (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to our Form 10-Q, filed on August 5, 2015)
10.2710.26 ~

 
Form of NMI Holdings, Inc. 2014 Omnibus Incentive Plan Performance Based Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement for Chief Executive Officer (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.26 to our Form 10-K, filed on February 17, 2017)
10.2810.27 ~ 
NMI Holdings, Inc. Severance Benefit Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Form 8-K, filed on February 17, 2016)
10.2910.28 ~ 
NMI Holdings, Inc. Change in Control Severance Benefit Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Form 8-K, filed on February 23, 2017)
10.3010.29 ~ 
NMI Holdings, Inc. Clawback Policy (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to our Form 8-K, filed on February 23, 2017)
10.31 ~
Separation Agreement between NMI Holdings, Inc. and Glenn Farrell effective July 31, 2017 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Form 8-K, filed on August 1, 2017)
21.1 
Subsidiaries of NMI Holdings, Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 21.1 to our Form 10-Q, filed on October 30, 2015)
31.1 
Principal Executive Officer's Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2 
Principal Financial Officer's Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

ii



32.1 # 
Certifications of CEO and CFO Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

ii



101 * 
The following financial information from NMI Holdings, Inc.'s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2017March 31, 2018 formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language):
(i) Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2017March 31, 2018 and December 31, 20162017
(ii) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the three and nine months ended September 30,March 31, 2018 and 2017 and 2016
     (iii) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity for the ninethree months ended September 30, 2017March 31, 2018 and the year ended December 31, 20162017
(iv) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the ninethree months ended September 30,March 31, 2018 and 2017, and 2016, and
(v) Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
~Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan or contract.
+Confidential treatment granted as to certain portions, which portions have been filed separately with the SEC.
#
In accordance with Item 601(b)(32)(ii) of Regulation S-K and SEC Release No. 34-47986, the certifications furnished in Exhibit 32 hereto are deemed to accompany this Form 10-Q and will not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Exchange Act or the Securities Act except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.
*In accordance with Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the information furnished in these exhibits will not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act.  Such exhibits will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.


iii