UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

☒QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended ~~March~~September ~~31,~~30, 2017

☐TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number: 001-33190

MCEWEN MINING INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Colorado		84-0796160
(State or other jurisdiction of		(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)		Identification No.)

150 King Street West, Suite 2800, Toronto, Ontario Canada M5H 1J9

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)

(866) 441-0690

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.


Large accelerated filer	☒		Accelerated filer		☐

Non-accelerated filer	☐		(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

		Smaller reporting company		☐

		Emerging growth company ☐	☐

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: ~~311,871,121~~332,976,861 shares outstanding as of ~~May 3,~~November 2, 2017.

Table of Contents

MCEWEN MINING INC.

FORM 10-Q

Index


	Part I FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.	Financial Statements	3

	Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive (Loss) Income for the three and nine months ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2017 and 2016 (unaudited)	3

	Consolidated Balance Sheets at ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2017 (unaudited) and December 31, 2016	4

	Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity for the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2017 and 2016 (unaudited)	5

	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2017 and 2016 (unaudited)	6

	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)	7

Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	1823

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk	3843

Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	3945

	Part II OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1A.	Risk Factors	4045

Item 6.	Exhibits	4146

SIGNATURES		4247

Table of Contents

PART I

Item 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

MCEWEN MINING INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) INCOME (UNAUDITED)

(in thousands of U.S. dollars, except per share)


	Three months ended March 31,				Three months ended September 30,				Nine months ended September 30,
	2017		2016		2017		2016		2017		2016
REVENUE:
Gold and silver sales	$	14,833	$	21,190	$	13,430	$	13,423	$	43,373	$	49,226
		14,833		21,190		13,430		13,423		43,373		49,226
COSTS AND EXPENSES
COSTS AND EXPENSES:
Production costs applicable to sales		6,984		9,067		8,649		6,409		24,193		21,239
Mine development costs		1,115		698		1,382		934		3,217		2,948
Exploration costs		8,444		1,740		2,356		2,166		13,886		5,595
Property holding costs		1,188		1,147		1,979		1,892		3,590		3,297
General and administrative		4,293		2,768		4,734		3,233		13,105		8,601
Depreciation		327		239		316		312		1,125		809
Revision of estimates and accretion of asset reclamation obligations (note 6)		105		124		320		125		541		382
Income from investment in Minera Santa Cruz S.A., net of amortization (note 5)		(190)		(4,963)
Loss (income) from investment in Minera Santa Cruz S.A., net of amortization (note 5)						462		(4,693)		535		(13,789)
Total costs and expenses		22,266		10,820		20,198		10,378		60,192		29,082
Operating (loss) income		(7,433)		10,370		(6,768)		3,045		(16,819)		20,144
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE):
Interest income (expense) and other income (expense)		(68)		228
OTHER (EXPENSE) INCOME:
Interest and other (expense) income:						(303)		599		(478)		754
Gain on sale of assets		11		—		—		24		11		24
Gain on sale of marketable equity securities (note 2)		—		22		—		—		840		22
Other-than-temporary impairment on marketable equity securities (note 2)		—		(285)		(356)		—		(356)		(882)
Unrealized gain on derivatives (note 2)		1,791		—
Foreign currency gain		25		783
Total other income		1,759		748
Unrealized (loss) gain on derivatives (note 2)						(933)		(197)		136		1,522
Foreign currency (loss) gain						(276)		130		799		632
Total other (expense) income						(1,868)		556		952		2,072
(Loss) Income before income taxes		(5,674)		11,118		(8,636)		3,601		(15,867)		22,216
Income taxes recovery (note 7)		2,656		1,867
Income tax recovery (note 7)						564		607		3,067		3,330
Net (loss) income		(3,018)		12,985		(8,072)		4,208		(12,800)		25,546
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME:
Unrealized gain (loss) on available-for-sale securities, net of taxes		3,875		(124)
Comprehensive income	$	857	$	12,861
Net (loss) income per share (note 9):
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) INCOME:
Reclassification of unrealized gain on marketable securities disposed of during the period, net of taxes (note 2)						—		—		(840)		—
Other-than-temporary impairment on marketable equity securities (note 2)						356		—		356		882
Unrealized (loss) gain on available-for-sale securities, net of taxes						(1,573)		290		2,066		1,790
Comprehensive (loss) income					$	(9,289)	$	4,498	$	(11,218)	$	28,218
Net (loss) income per share (note 10):
Basic	$	(0.01)	$	0.04	$	(0.03)	$	0.01	$	(0.04)	$	0.09
Diluted	$	(0.01)	$	0.04	$	(0.03)	$	0.01	$	(0.04)	$	0.09
Weighted average common shares outstanding (thousands) (note 9):
Weighted average common shares outstanding (thousands) (note 10):
Basic		299,575		298,242		314,077		298,510		307,445		298,330
Diluted		299,575		298,554		314,077		301,045		307,445		299,995

Return of capital distribution declared per common share (note 8)		0.005	$	—	$	0.005	$	0.005	$	0.010	$	0.005

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

MCEWEN MINING INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)


	March 31,		December 31,		September 30,		December 31,
	2017		2016		2017		2016
	(unaudited)				(unaudited)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	28,890	$	37,440	$	68,962	$	37,440
Investments (note 2)		15,329		8,543		9,225		8,543
Value added taxes receivable		6,340		4,304		7,913		4,304
Inventories (note 3)		29,453		26,620		19,560		26,620
Other current assets		1,703		1,667		2,790		1,667
Total current assets		81,715		78,574		108,450		78,574
Mineral property interests (note 4)		242,107		242,640		282,721		242,640
Investment in Minera Santa Cruz S.A. (note 5)		159,985		162,320		154,590		162,320
Property and equipment, net		14,255		14,252		14,049		14,252
Other assets (note 13)		1,316		532
Other assets (note 3, 14)						11,227		532
TOTAL ASSETS	$	499,378	$	498,318	$	571,037	$	498,318
LIABILITIES & SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	$	22,836	$	20,044	$	25,082	$	20,044
Current portion of asset retirement obligation (note 6)		530		537		689		537
Total current liabilities		23,366		20,581		25,771		20,581
Asset retirement obligation, less current portion (note 6)		9,411		9,306		9,995		9,306
Deferred income tax liability (note 7)		22,121		23,665		23,363		23,665
Other liabilities		1,705		1,727		657		1,727
Total liabilities	$	56,603	$	55,279	$	59,786	$	55,279

Shareholders’ equity:
Common stock, no par value, 500,000 shares authorized (in thousands);
Common: 299,590 as of March 31, 2017 and 299,570 as of December 31, 2016 issued and outstanding (in thousands)		1,359,224		1,360,345
332,977 as of September 30, 2017 and 299,570 as of December 31, 2016 issued and outstanding (in thousands)						1,435,953		1,360,345
Warrants (note 8)						3,822		—
Accumulated deficit		(921,990)		(918,972)		(931,772)		(918,972)
Accumulated other comprehensive income		5,541		1,666		3,248		1,666
Total shareholders’ equity		442,775		443,039		511,251		443,039
TOTAL LIABILITIES & SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY	$	499,378	$	498,318	$	571,037	$	498,318

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Commitments and contingencies, note 14.

Subsequent events, note ~~14.~~16

Table of Contents

MCEWEN MINING INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(UNAUDITED)

(in thousands of U.S. dollars and shares)


				Accumulated											Accumulated
				Other											Other
	Common Stock			Comprehensive		Accumulated				Common Stock			Warrants		Comprehensive		Accumulated
	Shares	Amount		(Loss) Income		Deficit		Total		Shares	Amount		Amount		(Loss) Income		Deficit		Total
Balance, December 31, 2015	298,634	$	1,359,144	$	(825)	$	(940,027)	$	418,292	298,634	$	1,359,144	$	—	$	(825)	$	(940,027)	$	418,292
Stock-based compensation	—		353		—		—		353
Stock-based compensation (note 9)										—		770		—		—		—		770
Return of capital distribution (note 8)	—		(1,489)		—		—		(1,489)	—		(2,986)		—		—		—		(2,986)
Share repurchase	(558)		(582)		—		—		(582)	(558)		(582)		—		—		—		(582)
Other-than-temporary impairment on marketable equity securities (note 2)					285				285
Unrealized loss on available-for-sale securities, net of taxes (note 2)	—		—		(124)		—		(124)
Exercise of stock options (note 8)										1,377		3,500		—		—		—		3,500
Other comprehensive income										—		—		—		2,672		—		2,672
Net income	—		—		—		12,985		12,985	—		—		—		—		25,546		25,546
Balance, March 31, 2016	298,076	$	1,357,426	$	(664)	$	(927,042)	$	429,720
Balance, September 30, 2016										299,453	$	1,359,846	$	—	$	1,847	$	(914,481)	$	447,212

Balance, December 31, 2016	299,570	$	1,360,345	$	1,666	$	(918,972)	$	443,039	299,570	$	1,360,345		—	$	1,666	$	(918,972)	$	443,039
Stock-based compensation	—		330		—		—		330
Stock-based compensation (note 9)										—		1,082		—		—		—		1,082
Shares issued in connection with the acquisition of Lexam VG Gold (note 15)										12,687		38,141		—		—		—		38,141
Shares issued in connection with the equity issuance (note 8)										20,700		39,397		—		—		—		39,397
Warrants issued in connection with the equity issuance (note 8)										—		—		3,822		—		—		3,822
Exercise of stock options (note 8)	20		47						47	20		47		—		—		—		47
Return of capital distribution (note 8)	—		(1,498)		—		—		(1,498)			(3,059)		—		—		—		(3,059)
Unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities, net of taxes (note 2)	—		—		3,875		—		3,875
Other comprehensive income (note 2)										—		—		—		1,582		—		1,582
Net loss	—		—		—		(3,018)		(3,018)	—		—		—		—		(12,800)		(12,800)
Balance, March 31, 2017	299,590	$	1,359,224	$	5,541	$	(921,990)	$	442,775
Balance, September 30, 2017										332,977	$	1,435,953	$	3,822	$	3,248	$	(931,772)	$	511,251

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

MCEWEN MINING INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)


	Three months ended March 31,				Nine months ended September 30,
	2017		2016		2017		2016
Cash flows from operating activities:
Cash paid to suppliers and employees	$	(24,242)	$	(8,457)	$	(59,903)	$	(37,436)
Cash received from gold and silver sales		14,833		20,319		43,373		48,355
Dividends received from Minera Santa Cruz S.A. (note 5)		2,525		2,626		7,195		13,270
Interest received		34		220		112		222
Cash (used in) provided by operating activities		(6,850)		14,708		(9,223)		24,411
Cash flows from investing activities:
Acquisition of mineral property interests		—		(450)		—		(5,950)
Additions to property and equipment		(350)		(145)		(944)		(1,086)
Proceeds from sale of investments (note 2)						2,155		470
Acquisition costs of Lexam VG Gold, net of cash and cash equivalents acquired (note 15)						(840)		—
Proceeds from disposal of property and equipment		36		—		33		994
Cash used in investing activities		(314)		(595)
Acquisition of investments						—		(2,518)
Cash provided by (used in) investing activities						404		(8,090)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from equity issuance (note 8)						42,453		—
Proceeds from warrants issuance (note 8)						4,122		—
Share and warrant issuance costs (note 8)						(3,353)		—
Repayment of short-term bank indebtedness		—		(3,395)		—		(3,395)
Return of capital distribution (note 8)		(1,498)		(1,489)		(3,059)		(2,986)
Share repurchase		—		(582)		—		(582)
Proceeds from the exercise of stock options		47		—		47		3,500
Cash used in financing activities		(1,451)		(5,466)
Cash provided by (used) in financing activities						40,210		(3,463)
Effect of exchange rate change on cash and cash equivalents		65		102		131		80
(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents		(8,550)		8,749
Increase in cash and cash equivalents						31,522		12,938
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		37,440		25,874		37,440		25,874
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	28,890	$	34,623	$	68,962	$	38,812

Reconciliation of net income (loss) to cash provided by operating activities:
Net income (loss)	$	(3,018)	$	12,985
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) from operating activities:
Income from investment in Minera Santa Cruz S.A., net of amortization (note 5)		(190)		(4,963)
Reconciliation of net (loss) income to cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Net (loss) income					$	(12,800)	$	25,546
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income from operating activities:
Loss (income) from investment in Minera Santa Cruz S.A., net of amortization (note 5)						535		(13,789)
Other-than-temporary impairment on marketable equity securities (note 2)		—		285		356		882
Gain on disposal of fixed assets		(11)		—
Gain (loss) on disposal of fixed assets						(11)		517
Recovery of deferred income taxes (note 7)		(2,656)		(1,867)		(3,067)		(3,330)
Gain on sale of marketable securities		—		(22)
Stock-based compensation		330		353
Gain on sale of marketable securities (note 2)						(840)		(22)
Stock-based compensation (note 9)						1,082		770
Depreciation		327		239		1,125		809
Accretion of asset retirement obligation		105		124
Revision of estimates and accretion of asset reclamation obligations (note 6)						541		382
Amortization of mineral property interests and asset retirement obligations		533		322		1,513		1,845
Foreign exchange gain		(65)		(102)		(131)		(80)
Unrealized gain on derivative investments (note 2)		(1,791)		—		(136)		(1,522)
Change in non-cash working capital items:
(Increase) decrease in VAT taxes receivable, net of collection of $448 (2016 - $6,771)		(2,040)		5,905
(Increase) decrease in other assets related to operations		(3,655)		206
Increase (decrease) in liabilities related to operations		2,756		(1,383)
Dividends received from Minera Santa Cruz S.A.		2,525		2,626
(Increase) decrease in VAT taxes receivable, net of collection of $1,610 (2016 - $9,523)						(3,609)		6,759
Increase (decrease) in other assets related to operations						(4,361)		(8,156)
Increase in liabilities related to operations						3,385		530
Dividends received from Minera Santa Cruz S.A. (note 5)						7,195		13,270
Cash (used in) provided by operating activities	$	(6,850)	$	14,708	$	(9,223)	$	24,411

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

MCEWEN MINING INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

~~March 31,~~September 30, 2017

(tabular amounts are in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise noted)

NOTE 1 NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Nature of Operations and Basis of Presentation

McEwen Mining Inc. (the “Company”) was organized under the laws of the State of Colorado on July 24, 1979. The Company is engaged in the exploration for, development of, production and sale of gold and ~~silver.~~silver, and with the acquisition of the Los Azules project in 2012, exploration for copper. On January 24, 2012, the Company changed its name from U.S. Gold Corporation to McEwen Mining Inc. after the completion of the acquisition of Minera Andes Inc. by way of a statutory plan of arrangement under the laws of the Province of Alberta, Canada.

The Company operates in Argentina, Mexico, Canada and the United States. It owns a 49% interest in Minera Santa Cruz S.A. (“MSC”), owner of the producing San José silver-gold mine in Santa Cruz, Argentina, which is operated by the joint venture majority owner, ~~of the joint venture,~~ Hochschild Mining plc. It also owns and operates the El Gallo 1 mine in Sinaloa, Mexico. Finally, the Company owns the Los Azules copper deposit in San Juan, Argentina, the El Gallo 2 project in Sinaloa, Mexico, the Gold Bar project in Nevada in the United States, and a portfolio of exploration properties in Argentina, Mexico, Nevada, and ~~Nevada.~~Timmins, Ontario in Canada.

The interim consolidated financial statements included herein have been prepared by the Company, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Certain information and note disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations, although the Company believes that the disclosures included are adequate to make the information presented not misleading.

In management’s opinion, the unaudited Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive (Loss) Income for the three and nine months ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2017 and 2016, the Consolidated Balance Sheets as at ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2017 (unaudited) and December 31, 2016, the unaudited Consolidated Statement of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity for the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2017 and 2016, and the unaudited Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2017 and 2016, contained herein, reflect all adjustments, consisting solely of normal recurring items, which are necessary for the fair presentation of the Company’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows on a basis consistent with that of the Company’s prior audited consolidated financial statements. However, the results of operations for the interim periods may not be indicative of results to be expected for the full fiscal year. Therefore, these financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and notes thereto and summary of significant accounting policies included in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016. Except as noted below, there have been no material changes toin the footnotes from those accompanying the audited consolidated financial statements contained in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016. The ~~Consolidated Financial Statements~~consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. ~~All inter-company~~Inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated.

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

Compensation – Stock Compensation – Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment ~~Accounting:~~Accounting: In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, which changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payment awards to employees, including the accounting for income taxes, forfeitures, and statutory tax withholding requirements, as well as classification in the statement of cash flows. The update to the standard is effective for the Company for fiscal years beginning after December 5, 2016, with early adoption permitted. Adoption of this guidance by the Company, effective ~~March 31,~~January 1, 2017, had no impact on the ~~Consolidated Financial Statements~~consolidated financial statements or disclosures.

Table of Contents

MCEWEN MINING INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

September 30, 2017

(tabular amounts are in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise noted)

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

Compensation – Stock Compensation – Scope of Modification Accounting: In July 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-11 which addresses narrow issues identified as a result of the complexity associated with applying generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for certain financial instruments with characteristics of liabilities and equity. The update to the standard is effective for the Company for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, with early application permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the effect of this amendment and the impact it may have on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-09 which provides clarity and reduces diversity in practice with respect to the modification of terms or conditions of a share-based payment award. The update to the standard is effective for the Company for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, with early application permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the effect of this amendment and the impact it may have on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Business Combinations:Definition of a business: In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-01 which changes the definition of a business to assist entities ~~with~~in evaluating when a set of transferred assets and activities is a business.

~~Table of Contents~~

~~MCEWEN MINING INC.~~

~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)~~

~~March 31, 2017~~

~~(tabular amounts are in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise noted)~~

The update to the standard is effective for the Company beginning after December 15, 2017, with early application permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the effect of this amendment and the impact it ~~will~~may have on the Company’s ~~Consolidated Financial Statements.~~consolidated financial statements.

Income Taxes - Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory:In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-16, to modify the current exception to income tax accounting that required companies to defer the income tax effect of certain intercompany transactions. ASU No. 2016-16 only allows companies to defer the income tax effect of intercompany inventory transactions under an exception to the guidance on income taxes that currently applies to intercompany sales and transfers of all assets. The update to the standard is effective for the Company beginning ~~January 1, 2018,~~after December 5, 2017, with early application permitted as of the beginning of an annual period. The Company is currently evaluating the effect of this amendment and the impact it ~~will~~may have on the Company’s ~~Consolidated Financial Statements.~~consolidated financial statements.

Revenue from Contracts with ~~Customers:~~ Customers: In 2016, the FASB issued ~~three~~four separate accounting standard updates regarding Topic 606: ASU 2016-08, ASU 2016-10, ASU 2016-12 and ASU ~~2016-12.~~2017-13. These ASUs outline amendments to Topic 606 which is not yet effective, including reporting revenue gross versus net, identifying performance obligations and licensing and narrow-scope improvements and practical expedients. The effective date and transition requirements for the amendments listed in these updates are the same as the effective date and transition requirements for Topic 606 (and any other Topic amended by Update 2014-09) which is January 1, 2018, with earlier application permitted. The Company will not be early adopting Topic 606.

The new guidance permits two methods of adoption: (i) the full retrospective method, under which comparative periods would be restated, and the cumulative impact of applying the standard would be recognized as at January 1, 2017, the earliest period presented; and (ii) the modified retrospective method, under which comparative periods would not be restated and the cumulative impact of applying the standard would be recognized at the date of initial adoption, January 1, 2018. The ~~Corporation~~Company expects to use the modified retrospective approach; however, it continues to monitor industry developments. Any significant industry developments could change the Company’s expected method of adoption.

~~The~~As of September 30, 2017, the Company ~~is currently evaluating~~performed a comprehensive analysis of most sales contracts, including those contracts of MSC, to determine the effect of this amendment and the impact it will have on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. ~~We have identified two potential areas~~In the case of impact including bullion and doré sales from our Mexico Operations and doré and concentrate sales from the San Jose mine which has an effect on the income (loss) from the investment in MSC under the equity method of accounting. To date,revenue recognized by the Company ~~has reviewed a sample~~in its consolidated financial statements, some of ~~sale agreements, and management is still in~~ the ~~process of completing~~items subject to the ~~assessment. Based on the analysis completed thus far, the standard may have an impact on the~~evaluation included timing of revenue recognition, due to a potential change in timing of control being transferred to the customer. The Company also continues to assess the impact of the new standard on other aspects of revenue recognition, such as potential impact on insurance and shipping services arranged by the Company on behalf of its ~~customers. We~~customers, and refining and treatment costs classification. In the case of revenue recognized by MSC, additional items included variable consideration on concentrate sales and take-or-pay contract considerations.

Table of Contents

MCEWEN MINING INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

September 30, 2017

(tabular amounts are in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise noted)

On October 6, 2017, the Company announced the completion of the acquisition of Black Fox Complex (“Black Fox”) certain assets and liabilities from Primero Mining Corporation (“Primero”). The Company is still in the process of reviewing the contracts acquired in connection with this recent acquisition of and completing the assessment of the impact.

Based on the analysis of most of the contracts completed thus far, the Company does not expect that the adoption of the standard will materially affect the timing of recognition of revenue in the Company’s consolidated financial statements at the transition date or prospectively, and the overall impact will be limited to increased disclosure requirements. The Company will continue ~~to assess~~monitoring industry developments and ~~implement~~assessing the new revenue recognition policy and any related impact on ~~our~~its internal controls with an expectation of having an update to the impact of the standard in the ~~second~~fourth quarter of 2017.

Leases – Amendments:In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02 ~~“leases (Topic 842)”~~ which core principle is that a lessee should recognize the assets and the liabilities that arise from leases, including operating leases. Under the new requirements, a lessee will recognize in the statement of financial position a liability to make lease payments (the lease liability) and the right-of-use asset representing the right to the underlying asset for the lease term. For leases with a term of twelve months or less, the lessee is permitted to make an accounting policy election by class of underlying asset not to recognize lease assets and lease liabilities. The recognition, measurement, and presentation of expenses and cash flows arising from a lease by a lessee have not significantly changed from the previous GAAP. The standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within such fiscal year, with early adoption permitted. The ASU requires a modified retrospective transition method with the option to elect a package of practical expedients. The Company is evaluating the effect of this amendment and the impact it ~~will~~may have on the Company’s ~~Consolidated Financial Statements.~~consolidated financial statements.

~~Table of Contents~~

~~MCEWEN MINING INC.~~

~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)~~

~~March 31, 2017~~

~~(tabular amounts are in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise noted)~~

Financial Instruments - Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities: In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-01, which updates certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of financial instruments. ASU 2016-01 is effective for the Company beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within ~~those~~such fiscal years. The Company is currently evaluating the effect of this amendment and the impact it ~~will~~may have on the Company’s ~~Consolidated Financial Statements.~~consolidated financial statements.

NOTE 2 INVESTMENTS

The Company’s investment portfolio consists of marketable equity securities and warrants of certain publicly-traded companies. The Company classifies ~~the~~ marketable equity securities as available-for-sale securities ~~which~~and warrants on equity interests in publicly-traded securities as held for trading securities. Marketable equity securities are recorded at fair value based upon quoted market ~~prices. The~~prices, and warrants are recorded at fair value using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The following is a summary of the balances of investments as of ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2017, and December 31, 2016:


							Other		Statement of										Other		Statement of
	Opening		Additions		Disposals		Comprehensive		Operations		Fair Value		Opening		Additions		Disposals		Comprehensive		Operations		Fair Value
	balance		during		during		Income (Loss)		(Loss)		end of the		balance		during		during		Income (Loss)		(Loss)		end of the
As of March 31, 2017	(January 1)		period		period		(pre-tax)		Income		period
As of September 30, 2017													(January 1)		period		period		(pre-tax)		Income		period
Marketable equity securities	$	6,749	$	—	$	—	$	4,995	$	—	$	11,744	$	6,749	$	—	$	(2,155)	$	2,217	$	484	$	7,295
Warrants		1,794		—		—		—		1,791		3,585		1,794		—		—		—		136		1,930
Investments	$	8,543	$	—	$	—	$	4,995	$	1,791	$	15,329	$	8,543	$	—	$	(2,155)	$	2,217	$	620	$	9,225

Table of Contents

MCEWEN MINING INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

September 30, 2017

(tabular amounts are in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise noted)


							Other		Statement of
	Opening		Additions		Disposals		Comprehensive		Operations		Fair Value
	balance		during		during		Income (Loss)		(Loss)		end of the
As of December 31, 2016	(January 1)		year		year		(pre-tax)		Income		year
Marketable equity securities	$	1,032	$	4,004	$	(470)	$	3,043	$	(860)	$	6,749
Warrants		—		415		—		—		1,379		1,794
Investments	$	1,032	$	4,419	$	(470)	$	3,043	$	519	$	8,543

As of ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2017, the cost of the marketable equity securities, net of impairment charges, and warrants was approximately ~~$4.9~~$3.3 million (December 31, 2016 - $4.9 million).

The Company maintains a portfolio of warrants on equity ~~interest~~interests in ~~publicly traded~~publicly-traded securities for investment ~~purposes.~~purposes which are not used in any hedging activities. As the warrants meet the definition of derivative instruments, unrealized gains or losses arising from their revaluation are recorded in the Consolidated Statement of Operations and Comprehensive ~~Income~~ (Loss). Income. During the three and nine months ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2017, the Company recorded an unrealized loss of $0.9 million and an unrealized gain of ~~$1.8~~$0.1 million ~~(March 31, 2016 - $nil).~~respectively, compared to an unrealized loss of $0.2 million and unrealized gain of $1.5 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016.

In addition, during the nine months ended September 30, 2017, the Company sold marketable equity securities for proceeds of $2.2 million. The Company realized a gain of $0.8 million, which is included in the Consolidated Statement of Operations and Comprehensive (Loss) Income. In the comparative nine months ended September 30, 2016, the Company realized a gain of $0.1 million on marketable equity securities sold.

Unrealized gains and losses for available-for-sale securities are included in other comprehensive income and not reported in Net (Loss) Income ~~(Loss)~~ unless the securities are sold or if there is an other-than- temporary decline in fair value below cost.

During the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2017, the Company reviewed its investment portfolio to determine if any security was other-than-temporarily impaired (“OTTI”). An OTTI security would require the Company to record an impairment charge in the ~~statement~~Consolidated Statement of ~~operations~~Operations and Comprehensive (Loss) Income in the period ~~any~~if such determination is made. In making this ~~determination,~~judgment, the Company evaluated, among other things, the duration and extent, if any, to which the fair value of a security was less than its cost; the financial condition of the issuer and any changes thereto; and the Company’s intent to sell, or whether it will more likely than not be required to sell, the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis.

From this assessment, the Company concluded that ~~none~~the fair value of ~~its~~certain marketable equity securities ~~were~~exhibited a prolonged decline in share price due to deterioration of the issuer’s results; therefore, the decline in these marketable equity securities was considered OTTI. Accordingly, the Company recognized an OTTI ~~(March 31,~~impairment loss of $0.4 million on the Consolidated Statement of Operations and Comprehensive (Loss) Income, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017. In the comparative period, the Company recorded an OTTI impairment loss of $nil and $0.9 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, ~~- $0.3 million).~~respectively.

~~The~~For the remaining marketable equity securities, the Company recorded aan unrealized loss, net of tax, of $1.6 million and unrealized gain, net of tax, ~~in other comprehensive income,~~ of ~~$3.9~~$2.1 million ~~($5.0 million pre-tax)~~ for the three and nine months ended ~~March 31, 2017. The gain was recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income and is reported as a separate line item in the shareholders' equity section of the balance sheet.~~September 30, 2017, respectively. During the three and nine months ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2016, the Company recognized ~~a loss,~~unrealized gain of $0.3 million and $1.8 million, respectively, net of ~~tax, in other comprehensive loss of $0.1 million.~~taxes.

910

Table of Contents

MCEWEN MINING INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

~~March 31,~~September 30, 2017

(tabular amounts are in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise noted)

NOTE 3 INVENTORIES


	September 30, 2017		December 31, 2016
Material on leach pads	$	10,412	$	14,267
In-process inventory		3,376		4,953
Stockpiles		1,960		1,102
Precious metals		2,328		5,035
Materials and supplies		1,484		1,263
Current Inventories	$	19,560	$	26,620

~~Inventories at March 31, 2017 and December~~

A portion of leach pad inventories in the amount of $10.9 million (December 31, 2016 ~~consist of~~– $nil) expected to be recovered after twelve months is included in the ~~following:~~Other assets.

March 31, 2017

December 31, 2016

Material on leach pads

$
16,611

$
14,267

In-process inventory

3,572

4,953

Stockpiles

2,723

1,102

Precious metals

5,059

5,035

Materials and supplies

1,488

1,263

Inventories

$
29,453

$
26,620

NOTE 4 MINERAL PROPERTY ~~INTEREST~~INTERESTS

The Company’s Mineral Property Interests include the El Gallo 1 mine in Mexico, the Gold Bar project in Nevada, the Los Azules project in Argentina, properties in Timmins, Canada, and other properties located in Mexico and Nevada.

The Company conducts a review of potential triggering events for impairment for all its mineral ~~projects~~property interests on a quarterly basis. When events or changes in circumstances indicate that the related carrying amounts may not be recoverable, the Company carries out a review and evaluation of its long-lived assets for impairment, in accordance with its accounting policy. During the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2017, the Company did not identify events or changes in circumstances affecting the carrying values of its long-lived assets.

The definition of proven and probable reserves is set forth in the SEC Industry Guide 7. If proven and probable reserves exist at the Company’s properties, the relevant capitalized mineral property interests and asset retirement costs are charged to expense based on the units of production method upon commencement of production. Since the Company has not completed feasibility or other studies sufficient to characterize the mineralized material at the El Gallo 1 ~~Mine~~mine as proven or probable reserves, the amortization of the capitalized mineral property interests and asset retirement costs are charged to expense based on the most appropriate amortization method which includes straight-line method or units-of-production method over the estimated useful life of the mine.

For the three and nine months ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2017, the Company recorded ~~$0.5~~$0.4 million ~~(March 31,~~and $1.5 million, respectively (September 30, 2016 ~~$0.3 million)~~- $0.7 million and $1.8 million, respectively), of amortization expense related to the El Gallo 1 ~~Mine,~~mine, which is included in Production Costs Applicable to Sales in the Consolidated Statement of Operations and Comprehensive ~~Income~~ (Loss). Income.

NOTE 5 INVESTMENT IN MINERA SANTA CRUZ S.A. (“MSC”) – SAN JOSÉ MINE

The Company accounts for investments over which it exerts significant influence but does not control through majority ownership using the equity method of accounting. In applying the equity method of accounting to the Company’s investment in MSC, MSC’s financial statements, which are originally prepared by MSC in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board, are translated into U.S. GAAP by MSC’s management. As such, the summarized financial data ~~presented~~ under this heading is presented in accordance with U.S. GAAP.

The Company’s 49% attributable share of results of operations from its investment in MSC was ~~income~~a loss of ~~$0.2~~$0.5 million for the three and nine months ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2017 ~~(March 31,~~(September 30, 2016 ~~- $5.0 million)~~– income of $4.7 million and $13.8 million, respectively). These amounts include the amortization of the fair value increments arising from the purchase price

Table of Contents

MCEWEN MINING INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

September 30, 2017

(tabular amounts are in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise noted)

allocation and related income tax ~~recovery. Included in the income tax~~ recovery ~~is the impact of fluctuations in the exchange rate between the Argentina peso and the U.S. dollar on the peso-denominated mineral property interest fair value increment and deferred tax liability~~ associated with the investment in MSC recorded as part of the acquisition of Minera Andes.

For the three months ended March 31, 2017, income tax recovery from the depreciation of the fair value increment was almost completely offset by the impact of the appreciation of the Argentina peso relative to the U.S. dollar on the deferred tax liability. In the comparative period in 2016, the impact of the devaluation of the Argentina peso relative to the U.S. dollar resulted in higher recovery of deferred income taxes.

~~Table of Contents~~

~~MCEWEN MINING INC.~~

~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)~~

~~March 31, 2017~~

~~(tabular amounts are in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise noted)~~

During the period ended March 31, 2017, the Company did not identify any potential triggering events for impairment in relation to its investment in MSC, and consequently the Company did not record any impairment during the period.

During the three and nine months ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2017, the Company received ~~$2.5~~$2.3 million and $7.2 million in dividends from MSC, ~~compared~~respectively. This compares to ~~$2.6~~$7.9 million and $13.3 million received during the ~~same period in 2016.~~three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively.

Changes in the Company’s investment in MSC for the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2017 and year ended December 31, 2016 are as follows:


	March 31, 2017		December 31, 2016		September 30, 2017		December 31, 2016
Investment in MSC, beginning of the period	$	162,320	$	167,107	$	162,320	$	167,107
Attributable net income (loss) from MSC		2,147		15,961
Attributable net income from MSC						1,941		15,961
Amortization of fair value increments		(2,069)		(12,274)		(6,967)		(12,274)
Income tax recovery		112		9,264		4,491		9,264
Dividend distribution received		(2,525)		(17,738)		(7,195)		(17,738)
Investment in MSC, end of the period	$	159,985	$	162,320	$	154,590	$	162,320

A summary of the operating results from MSC for the three and nine months ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2017 and 2016 is as follows:


	Three months ended March 31,				Three months ended September 30,				Nine months ended September 30,
	2017		2016		2017		2016		2017		2016
Minera Santa Cruz S.A. (100%)
Net Sales	$	48,343	$	52,072	$	52,722	$	72,116	$	161,900	$	182,769
Production costs applicable to sales		(36,699)		(37,727)		(43,596)		(49,345)		(132,710)		(125,904)
Net income		4,381		8,728		707		12,072		3,962		31,293

Portion attributable to McEwen Mining Inc. (49%)
Net income	$	2,147	$	4,042
Net (loss) income					$	346	$	5,916	$	1,941	$	15,334
Amortization of fair value increments		(2,069)		(3,682)		(2,469)		(2,914)		(6,967)		(9,370)
Income tax recovery		112		4,603		1,661		1,691		4,491		7,825
Income from investment in MSC, net of amortization	$	190	$	4,963
(Loss) income from investment in MSC, net of amortization					$	(462)	$	4,693	$	(535)	$	13,789

As of ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2017, MSC had current assets of ~~$104.1~~$99.1 million, total assets of ~~$461.9~~$419.1 million, current liabilities of ~~$58.3~~$35.0 million and total liabilities of ~~$135.3~~$103.7 million on an unaudited basis. These balances include the adjustments to fair value and amortization of the fair value increments arising from the purchase price allocation, net of impairment charges. Excluding the fair value increments from the purchase price allocation ~~net of impairment charges,~~and other adjustments, MSC had current assets of ~~$103.3~~$98.5 million, total assets of ~~$286.6~~$255.3 million, current liabilities of ~~$62.4~~$40.2 million, and total liabilities of ~~$87.2~~$65.6 million as at ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2017.

NOTE 6 RECLAMATION OBLIGATIONS

The Company is responsible for the reclamation of certain past and future disturbances at its properties. The ~~two~~ most significant properties subject to these obligations are the Tonkin property in the state of Nevada, ~~and~~ the El Gallo 1 mine in ~~Mexico. The Final Plan for Permanent Closure (“FPPC”)~~Mexico, and the Amended Plan of Operations for the Tonkin property was approved by the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection (“NDEP”) and by the Bureau of Land Management (“BLM”) pursuant to the Finding of No Significant Impact in March 2012 and September 2015, respectively. Subsequently, on October 3, 2015 the BLM requested an updated bonding requirementTimmins properties in the ~~amount~~province of ~~$3.6 million,~~Ontario which ~~is covered within~~were acquired through the ~~surety bonds obtained by the Company as of March 31,~~transaction with Lexam VG Gold (“Lexam”) in April 2017. ~~Under current Mexican regulations, surety bonding of projected reclamation costs is not required.~~

~~A reconciliation of the Company’s asset retirement obligations for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and for the year ended December 31, 2016 are as follows:~~

1112

Table of Contents

MCEWEN MINING INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

~~March 31,~~September 30, 2017

(tabular amounts are in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise noted)

A reconciliation of the Company’s asset retirement obligations for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and for the year ended December 31, 2016 is as follows:


	March 31, 2017		December 31, 2016		September 30, 2017		December 31, 2016
Asset retirement obligation liability, beginning of the period	$	9,843	$	7,784	$	9,843	$	7,784
Settlements		(7)		(66)		(97)		(66)
Accretion of liability		105		506		337		506
Current year additions						570		—
Adjustment reflecting updated estimates		—		1,619		(17)		1,619
Foreign exchange revaluation						48		—
Asset retirement obligation liability, ending balance	$	9,941	$	9,843	$	10,684	$	9,843
Current portion		(530)		(537)		(689)		(537)
Non-current portion	$	9,411	$	9,306	$	9,995	$	9,306

NOTE 7 INCOME TAXES

The Company’s income tax expense differs from the amount computed by applying the U.S. federal and state statutory corporate income tax rate of 35% to income before taxes primarily as a result of valuation allowances being applied to losses, changes in the deferred tax asset associated with marketable securities and changes in the deferred tax ~~liability~~liabilities associated with mineral property interests acquired in the Minera Andes ~~acquisition.~~and Lexam acquisitions. The deferred tax liability is primarily impacted by fluctuations in the foreign exchange rate between the ~~Argentina~~Argentine peso and the U.S. dollar.

For the three and nine months ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2017, the Company ~~reduced the~~recorded a deferred income tax recovery ~~by $1.6~~of $0.6 million ~~(March 31, 2016 - $1.9 million) as~~and $3.1 million, respectively. The deferred income tax recovery is a combined result of ~~the increased~~fluctuations in tax benefits related to exploration spending inat Los Azules, ~~giving rise to a deferred tax benefit partially offset by~~ the ~~appreciation~~Argentine peso devaluation and the unrealized gains in the value of our investments recorded through Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income during the ~~Argentina Peso. The~~period. In comparison, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, the Company ~~also~~ recorded an income tax recovery of ~~$1.1~~$0.6 million, ~~(March 31, 2016 - $nil) due to~~and $3.3 million respectively, primarily resulting from the ~~increase in value of its publicly traded securities classified as available for sale instruments, with the deferred tax benefit recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income.~~ Argentine peso devaluation.

NOTE 8 SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

During the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2017, 20,000 shares of common stock were issued upon the exercise of stock options under the Company’s Equity Incentive Plan, at the weighted average exercise price of $2.34 per share for proceeds of $0.1 million. This compares to ~~nil~~1,377,085 shares of common stock issued upon exercise of stock options during the same period of 2016, ~~under the Equity Incentive Plan.~~at a weighted average exercise price of $2.56 per share for proceeds of $3.5 million.

During the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2017, the Company paid atwo semi-annual ~~return~~returns of capital ~~distribution of $0.005 (March 31,~~distributions totaling $0.01 (September 30, 2016 - ~~$0.005),~~$0.01) per share of common stock, for a total distribution of ~~$1.5~~$3.1 million ~~(March 31,~~(September 30, 2016 - ~~$1.5~~$3.0 million).

The Company issued 12,687,035 shares of common stock as part of the Lexam acquisition completed on April 26, 2017. See Note 15 Acquisition of Lexam.

Equity Offering

On September 22, 2017, the Company issued 20,700,000 common shares and 10,350,000 warrants for net proceeds of $43.2 million, after deducting issuance costs of $3.4 million. Each common share subscribed for, entitled the holder to receive half a warrant, and each whole warrant entitles the holder to purchase one common share at a price of $2.70. Warrants are exercisable at any time prior to September 28, 2018, after which the warrants will expire and be of no value.

Table of Contents

MCEWEN MINING INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

September 30, 2017

(tabular amounts are in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise noted)

The Company concluded that both common shares and warrants are equity-linked financial instruments and should be accounted for permanently in the Shareholder’s Equity section in the Consolidated Balance Sheet, with no requirement to subsequently revalue any of the instruments. Based on the relative fair values, the Company allocated $39.4 million to common shares and $3.8 million to warrants, net of issuance costs.

The Company used the Black-Scholes pricing model to determine the fair value of warrants using the following assumptions:


Risk-free interest rate	1.56	%
Dividend yield	0.36	%
Volatility factor of the expected market price of common stock	71	%
Weighted-average expected life	53 weeks
Weighted-average grant date fair value	0.40

All 10,350,000 warrants remained outstanding and unexercised as of September 30, 2017.

NOTE 9 ~~NET~~STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

During the nine months ended September 30, 2017, 0.4 million stock options were granted to certain employees at a weighted average exercise price of $2.78 per share, which includes 0.1 million options issued as part of exchange of each option to purchase a common share of Lexam for a replacement option entitling the holder to acquire 0.056 share of the Company’s common stock. See Note 15 Acquisition of Lexam. In comparison, during the nine months ended September 30, 2016, 0.6 million stock options were granted to certain employees at a weighted average exercise price of $3.99 per share. The options vest equally over a three-year period (subject to acceleration of vesting in certain events) if the individual remains affiliated with the Company and are exercisable for a period of 5 years from the date of issue.

The principal assumptions used in applying the Black-Scholes option pricing model for these awards were as follows:


	Three months ended September 30,				Nine months ended September 30,
	2017		2016		2017		2016
Risk-free interest rate	1.46	%	1.15	%	1.49	%	1.15	%
Dividend yield	0.36	%	0.25	%	0.34	%	0.25	%
Volatility factor of the expected market price of common stock	72	%	74	%	73	%	74	%
Weighted-average expected life of option	3.5 years		5 years		3.5 years		5 years
Weighted-average grant date fair value	1.40		2.36		1.52		2.36

During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, the Company recorded stock option expense of $0.3 million and $1.1 million respectively. This compares to $0.3 million and $0.8 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016.

NOTE 10 (LOSS) INCOME PER SHARE

Basic net income (loss) ~~income~~ per share is computed by dividing the net (loss) income available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net (loss) income per share is computed similarly except that the weighted average number of common shares is increased to reflect all dilutive instruments.

1214

Table of Contents

MCEWEN MINING INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

~~March 31,~~September 30, 2017

(tabular amounts are in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise noted)

Below is a reconciliation of the basic and diluted weighted average number of common shares and exchangeable shares outstanding and the computations for basic and diluted net (loss) income per share for the three and nine months ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2017 and 2016:


					Three months ended September 30,				Nine months ended September 30,
	Three months ended March 31,					2017	2016		2017		2016
	2017		2016			(amounts in thousands, except net income per share)
	(amounts in thousands, except net income per share)
Net (loss) income	$	(3,018)	$	12,985	$	(8,072)	$	4,208	$	(12,800)	$	25,546

Weighted average common shares outstanding:		299,575		298,242		314,077		298,510		307,445		298,330
Effect of employee stock-based awards		—		312		—		2,535		—		1,665
Diluted shares outstanding:		299,575		298,554		314,077		301,045		307,445		299,995

Net (loss) income per share:
Basic	$	(0.01)	$	0.04	$	(0.03)	$	0.01	$	(0.04)	$	0.09
Diluted	$	(0.01)	$	0.04	$	(0.03)	$	0.01	$	(0.04)	$	0.09

For the three and nine months ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2017, as the Company was in a loss position, all potentially dilutive instruments were anti-dilutive and therefore not included in the calculation of diluted net loss per share.

For the three months ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2016, options to purchase ~~4.6~~1.3 million shares of common stock outstanding at an average exercise price of ~~$3.26~~$5.18 per share ~~which~~ were not included in the computation of diluted weighted average shares because the exercise price exceeded the average price of the Company’s common stock during that period. For the nine months ended September 30, 2016, options to purchase 2.4 million shares of common stock outstanding at an average exercise price of $4.14 per share were not included in the computation of diluted weighted average shares because the exercise price exceeded the average price of the Company’s common stock during the nine months ended September 30, 2016.

NOTE 1011 RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

The Company recorded the following expense (income) in respect to the related parties outlined below:


	Three months ended March 31,				Three months ended September 30,				Nine months ended September 30,
	2017		2016		2017		2016		2017		2016
Lexam L.P.	$	62	$	20	$	—	$	82	$	90	$	153
Lexam VG Gold		(33)		23		—		17		(33)		57
Noblegen Inc.						40		—		40		—
REVlaw		49		23		86		38		169		92

The Company has the following outstanding accounts payable balance in respect to the related parties outlined below:


	March 31,		December 31,		September 30,		December 31,
	2017		2016		2017		2016
Lexam L.P.	$	—	$	—
Lexam VG Gold		—		27		—		27
Noblegen Inc.						45		—
REVlaw		21		148		35		148

Table of Contents

MCEWEN MINING INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

September 30, 2017

(tabular amounts are in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise noted)

An aircraft owned by Lexam L.P. (which is controlled by Robert R. McEwen, limited partner and beneficiary of Lexam

L.P. and the Company’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer) has been made available to the Company in order to expedite business travel. In his role as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, Mr. McEwen must travel extensively and frequently on short notice. Mr. McEwen is able to charter the aircraft from Lexam L.P. at a preferential rate approved by the Company’s independent board members under a policy whereby only the variable expenses of operating this aircraft for business related travel are eligible for reimbursement by the Company.

Robert R. McEwen was the Non-Executive Chairman of Lexam VG Gold (“Lexam”) and held 27% ownership in Lexam. The Company agreed to share services with Lexam VG Gold Inc. including rent, personnel, office expenses and other administrative services. These transactions were in the normal course of business. Subsequent to the period-end, onOn April

~~Table of Contents~~

~~MCEWEN MINING INC.~~

~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)~~

~~March 31, 2017~~

~~(tabular amounts are in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise noted)~~

26, 2017, the Company completed the acquisition of 100% of the issued and outstanding securities of ~~Lexam. Refer~~Lexam and Lexam became a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. See Note 15 Acquisition of Lexam. Prior to the acquisition, Robert R. McEwen was the Non-Executive Chairman of Lexam and held a 27% ownership in Lexam and the Company shared services with Lexam including rent, personnel, office expenses and other administrative services. Historically, these transactions were in the normal course of business.

Robert R. McEwen is also a significant shareholder of Noblegen Inc., a company that develops processes to ~~Note 14 Subsequent Events for further details~~commercially cultivate microorganisms with applications in different industries. . The metallurgical services provided by Noblegen Inc. are in the normal course of business and have been recorded at their exchange amount.

REVlaw is a company owned by Ms. Carmen Diges, General Counsel of the Company. The legal services of Ms. Diges as General Counsel and one other member of the legal department are provided by REVlaw in the normal course of ~~business. These legal fees~~business and have been recorded at their exchange ~~amount and these transactions are in the normal course of business.~~amount.

NOTE 1112 OPERATING SEGMENT REPORTING

McEwen Mining is a mining and minerals exploration company focused on precious metals in Argentina, Mexico, Canada and the United States. The Company’s chief operating decision maker (“CODM”) reviews the operating results, assesses performance and makes decisions about allocation of resources to these segments at the geographic region level or major mine/project level where the economic characteristics of the individual mines or projects are not alike. As a result, these operating segments also represent the Company’s reportable segments. The Company’s business activities that are not considered operating segments and not provided to the CODM for review are included in Corporate and other and are provided in this note for reconciliation purposes.

The CODM reviews segment (loss) income, ~~(loss),~~ defined as gold and silver sales less production costs applicable to sales, mine development costs, exploration costs, property holding costs and general and administrative expenses for all segments except for the MSC segment which is evaluated based on the attributable equity ~~income.~~income or loss. Gold and silver sales and production costs applicable to sales for the reportable segments are reported net of intercompany transactions.

In the second quarter of 2017, the Company completed the acquisition of Lexam which included a portfolio of exploration projects located in Timmins, Ontario. The performance and allocation of resources to these assets is done separately by the CODM. As a result, for the three and nine months ended September 2017, the Company separately reported segment (loss) income attributable to Timmins. The updated composition of segments reflects the distinct economic characteristic of each mine/project. Significant information relating to the Company’s reportable operating segments is summarized in the tables ~~below:~~

Total

Segment
Three months ended March 31, 2017

Mexico

MSC

Los Azules

Nevada

Income (loss)
Gold and silver sales

$
14,833

$
—

$
—

$
—

$
14,833
Production costs applicable to sales

(6,984)

—

—

—

(6,984)
Mine development costs

(155)

—

—

(960)

(1,115)
Exploration costs

(1,539)

—

(6,301)

(484)

(8,324)
Property holding costs

(982)

—

(1)

(205)

(1,188)
General and administrative expenses

(839)

—

(208)

(426)

(1,473)
Income from investment in Minera Santa Cruz S.A. (net of amortization)

—

190

—

—

190
Segment income (loss)

$
4,334

$
190

$
(6,510)

$
(2,075)

$
(4,061)
Corporate and other

Other exploration

(120)
General and administrative expenses

(2,820)
Depreciation

(327)
Revision of estimates and accretion of reclamation obligations

(105)
Interest and other expense

(68)
Gain on sale of assets

11
Unrealized gain on derivatives

1,791
Foreign currency gain

25
Net loss before income taxes

$
(5,674)

below.

1416

Table of Contents

MCEWEN MINING INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

~~March 31,~~September 30, 2017

(tabular amounts are in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise noted)


									Total												Total
									Segment												Segment
Three months ended March 31, 2016	Mexico		MSC		Los Azules		Nevada		Income (loss)
Three months ended September 30, 2017											Mexico		MSC		Los Azules		USA			Timmins	Income (Loss)
Gold and silver sales	$	21,190	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	21,190	$	13,430	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	13,430
Production costs applicable to sales		(9,067)		—		—		—		(9,067)		(8,649)		—		—		—		—		(8,649)
Mine development costs		(78)		—		—		(620)		(698)		(273)		—		—		(1,109)		—		(1,382)
Exploration costs		(785)		—		(310)		(588)		(1,683)		(1,149)		—		(365)		(556)		(137)		(2,207)
Property holding costs		(830)		—		(93)		(224)		(1,147)		(1,044)		—		—		(935)		—		(1,979)
General and administrative expenses		(719)		—		(39)		(55)		(813)		(715)		—		(320)		(441)		(32)		(1,508)
Income from investment in Minera Santa Cruz S.A. (net of amortization)		—		4,963		—		—		4,963
Loss from investment in Minera Santa Cruz S.A. (net of amortization)												—		(462)		—		—		—		(462)
Segment income (loss)	$	9,711		4,963	$	(442)	$	(1,487)	$	12,745	$	1,600	$	(462)	$	(685)	$	(3,041)	$	(169)	$	(2,757)
Corporate and other
Other exploration										(57)											$	(149)
General and administrative expenses										(1,955)												(3,226)
Depreciation										(239)												(316)
Revision of estimates and accretion of reclamation obligations										(124)												(320)
Interest and other income										228
Interest and other expense																						(303)
Other-than-temporary impairment on marketable equity securities										(285)												(356)
Gain on sale of marketable securities										22
Unrealized gain on derivatives																						(933)
Foreign currency gain										783												(276)
Net income before income taxes									$	11,118
Net loss before income taxes																					$	(8,636)


											Total
											Segment
Nine months ended September 30, 2017	Mexico		MSC		Los Azules		USA			Timmins	Income (Loss)
Gold and silver sales	$	43,373	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	43,373
Production costs applicable to sales		(24,193)		—		—		—		—		(24,193)
Mine development costs		(605)		—		—		(2,612)		—		(3,217)
Exploration costs		(4,201)		—		(7,507)		(1,487)		(267)		(13,462)
Property holding costs		(2,089)		—		(48)		(1,453)		—		(3,590)
General and administrative expenses		(2,594)		—		(949)		(1,226)		(58)		(4,827)
Loss from investment in Minera Santa Cruz S.A. (net of amortization)		—		(535)		—		—		—		(535)
Segment income (loss)	$	9,691	$	(535)	$	(8,504)	$	(6,778)	$	(325)	$	(6,451)
Corporate and other
Other exploration											$	(424)
General and administrative expenses												(8,278)
Depreciation												(1,125)
Revision of estimates and accretion of reclamation obligations												(541)
Interest and other expense												(478)
Gain on sale of assets												11
Gain on sale of marketable equity securities												840
Other-than-temporary impairment on marketable equity securities												(356)
Unrealized gain on derivatives												136
Foreign currency gain												799
Net loss before income taxes											$	(15,867)

Table of Contents

MCEWEN MINING INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

September 30, 2017

(tabular amounts are in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise noted)


											Total
											Segment
Three months ended September 30, 2016	Mexico		MSC		Los Azules		USA			Timmins	Income (Loss)
Gold and silver sales	$	13,423	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	13,423
Production costs applicable to sales		(6,409)		—		—		—		—		(6,409)
Mine development costs		(341)		—		—		(593)		—		(934)
Exploration costs		(1,094)		—		(543)		(506)		—		(2,143)
Property holding costs		(812)		—		(192)		(888)		—		(1,892)
General and administrative expenses		(474)		—		(234)		(69)		—		(777)
Income from investment in Minera Santa Cruz S.A. (net of amortization)		—		4,693		—		—		—		4,693
Segment income (loss)	$	4,293	$	4,693	$	(969)	$	(2,056)	$	—	$	5,961
Corporate and other
Other exploration											$	(23)
General and administrative expenses												(2,456)
Depreciation												(312)
Revision of estimates and accretion of reclamation obligations												(125)
Interest and other expense												599
Gain on sale of assets												24
Unrealized gain on derivatives												(197)
Foreign currency gain												130
Net income before income taxes											$	3,601


											Total
											Segment
Nine months ended September 30, 2016	Mexico		MSC		Los Azules		USA			Timmins	Income (Loss)
Gold and silver sales	$	49,226	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	49,226
Production costs applicable to sales		(21,239)		—		—		—		—		(21,239)
Mine development costs		(1,038)		—		—		(1,910)		—		(2,948)
Exploration costs		(2,739)		—		(1,046)		(1,692)		—		(5,477)
Property holding costs		(1,642)		—		(367)		(1,288)		—		(3,297)
General and administrative expenses		(1,963)		—		(419)		(176)		—		(2,558)
Income from investment in Minera Santa Cruz S.A. (net of amortization)		—		13,789		—		—		—		13,789
Segment income (loss)	$	20,605	$	13,789	$	(1,832)	$	(5,066)	$	—	$	27,496
Corporate and other
Other exploration											$	(118)
General and administrative expenses												(6,043)
Depreciation												(809)
Revision of estimates and accretion of reclamation obligations												(382)
Interest and other income												754
Other-than-temporary impairment on marketable equity securities												(882)
Gain on sale of assets												24
Gain on sale of marketable securities												22
Unrealized gain on derivatives												1,522
Foreign currency gain												632
Net income before income taxes											$	22,216

Table of Contents

MCEWEN MINING INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

September 30, 2017

(tabular amounts are in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise noted)

Geographic information

Long-lived Assets as at

Revenue(1)

March 31,

December 31

Three months ended March 31,


2017

2016

2017

2016
Canada

$
1,409

$
663

$
—

$
—
Mexico

27,098

27,582

14,833

21,190
USA

37,646

37,620

—

—
Argentina(2)

351,510

353,879

—

—
Total consolidated

$
417,663

$
419,744

$
14,833

$
21,190


	Revenue(1)
	Three months ended September 30,				Nine months ended September 30,
	2017		2016			2017		2016
Mexico	$	13,430	$	13,423	$	43,373	$	49,226
Total consolidated	$	13,430	$	13,423	$	43,373	$	49,226


	Long-lived Assets as at
	September 30,		December 31,
	2017		2016
Canada	$	42,555	$	663
Mexico		36,879		27,582
USA		37,071		37,620
Argentina(2)		346,082		353,879
Total consolidated	$	462,587	$	419,744

(1)Presented based on the location from which the product originated.

(2)Includes Investment in MSC of $154.6 million as of September 30, 2017 (December 31, 2016 - $162.3 million).

~~(1)~~

~~Presented based on the location from which the product originated.~~

~~(2)~~

~~Includes Investment in MSC of $160.0 million as of March 31, 2017 (December 31, 2016 - $162.3 million).~~

NOTE 1213 FAIR VALUE ACCOUNTING

Fair value accounting establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair ~~value.~~value of certain assets and liabilities. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are described below:

Level 1Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities;

~~Table of Contents~~

~~MCEWEN MINING INC.~~

~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)~~

~~March 31, 2017~~

~~(tabular amounts are in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise noted)~~

Level 2Quoted prices in markets that are not active, or inputs that are observable, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability; and

Level 3Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable (supported by little or no market activity).

Table of Contents

MCEWEN MINING INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

September 30, 2017

(tabular amounts are in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise noted)

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis

The following table identifies the fair value of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities as reported in the Consolidated Balance Sheets at ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 by level within the fair value hierarchy. As required by accounting guidance, assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.


	Fair Value as at March 31, 2017								Fair Value as at September 30, 2017
	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Assets:
Investments	$	15,329	$	11,744	$	3,585	$	—	$	9,225	$	7,295	$	1,930	$	—
Total	$	15,329	$	11,744	$	3,585	$	—	$	9,225	$	7,295	$	1,930	$	—


	Fair Value as at December 31 2016
	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Assets:
Investments	$	8,543	$	6,749	$	1,794	$	—
Total	$	8,543	$	6,749	$	1,794	$	—

The Company's investments ~~include~~mainly consist of marketable equity securities which are ~~exchange traded,~~exchange-traded, and which are valued using quoted market prices in active markets and are classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. The fair value of the investments is calculated as the quoted market price of the marketable equity security multiplied by the number of shares held by the Company.

~~Furthermore,~~Further, as noted in Note 2,Investments, the Company’s investments also include warrants ~~to purchase common stock of certain extractive industry companies.~~on equity interests in publicly-traded securities. Since these warrants are not traded on an active market, they are valued using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, and classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. ~~The main inputs used in the valuation of the warrants are volatility, interest rate, dividend yield and exercise price of the instruments.~~

The fair value of other financial assets and liabilities ~~were assumed to~~ approximate their carrying values due to their short-term nature and historically negligible credit losses.

NOTE 1314 COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

~~Surety~~Reclamation Bonds

As part of its ongoing business and operations, the Company is required to provide bonding for its environmental reclamation obligations in the United States. Pursuant to the requirements imposed by Bureau of Land Management (“BLM”), the Company has Nevada bonding obligations of $19.9 million which primarily pertains to the Tonkin property and the Gold Bar property reclamation requirements. Under current Mexican regulations, bonding of projected reclamation costs is not required. Under Canadian regulations, the Company was required to deposit approximately $0.1 million with respect to its properties in Timmins. The $0.1 million is recorded as restricted cash in Other assets.

Surety Bonds

The Company satisfies its Nevada bonding obligations through the use of surety bonds. These surety bonds are available for draw down by the BLM in the event the Company does not perform its reclamation obligations. When the specific reclamation requirements are met, the ~~beneficiary of the surety bonds~~BLM will cancel and/or return the instrument to the issuing entity. The Company believes ~~that~~ it is in compliance with all applicable bonding obligations and will be able to satisfy future bonding requirements, through existing or alternative means, as they arise.

1620

Table of Contents

MCEWEN MINING INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

~~March 31,~~September 30, 2017

(tabular amounts are in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise noted)

On June 23, 2017, the Company replaced its previous surety facility by entering into a new $20.0 million surety facility, carrying an annual financing fee of 2%, with no requirement for an initial deposit and the financing fee payable only on draw down amounts. The $0.5 million deposit associated with the previous facility and recorded in Other assets was received by the Company in July 2017.

On August 25, 2017, the BLM in Nevada accepted the Company’s bond in the amount of $15.0 million to provide reclamation coverage for operations on the Gold Bar property. On August 25, 2017, the Company drew down $15.0 million on the existing surety to satisfy the bonding requirements for the Gold Bar project. As ~~at March 31,~~of September 30, 2017, ~~there were $4.8~~the Company had a total of $19.9 million of surety bonds outstanding ~~(December 31, 2016 - $4.8~~which primarily pertain to the Gold Bar property and the Tonkin property reclamation requirements.

Pursuant to the Black Fox acquisition, which closed subsequent to quarter end, as described in Note 16 Subsequent Events, the Company extended its existing $20.0 million surety facility to include the necessary bonding to satisfy the Black Fox closure plan. The terms of the credit facility remain the same, with no requirement for an initial deposit and an annual financing fee of 2% due on draw down. Black Fox has bonding requirements of $16.5 million (C$20.6 million). ~~The annual financing fees are 1.5%~~On September 15, 2017, the Company issued surety bond letters to the Ministry of Mines and Northern Development (“MNDM”) in Ontario to assume these liabilities effective October 2, 2017. On September 27, 2017, the ~~value of~~Company received notification from the MNDM that the surety bonds had been accepted.

NOTE 15 ACQUISITION OF LEXAM

OnApril 26, 2017, the Company completed the acquisition of 100% of the issued and outstanding common shares of Lexam by the way of the Arrangement Agreement dated February 13, 2017 and related Plan of Arrangement (the “Arrangement”). Pursuant to the Arrangement, each common share of Lexam was exchanged for 0.056 of a common share of the Company and each option to purchase a common share of Lexam was exchanged for a replacement option entitling the holder to acquire 0.056 share of the Company’s common stock.

The Company’s total purchase price of $39.2 million was comprised of 12,687,035 common shares issued from treasury valued at $3.00 per share, share replacement awards of $0.1 million and transaction costs totaling $1.0 million. The Lexam acquisition was accounted for as an asset acquisition and transaction costs associated with the acquisition were capitalized to the Mineral Property Interests acquired, consistent with the Company’s Mineral Property Interests accounting policy.

The following table sets out the allocation of the purchase price to assets acquired and liabilities assumed, based on management’s estimates of relative fair value:


Total purchase price:
Common shares issued for acquisition	$	38,141
Transaction fees incurred		1,017
	$	39,158
Fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed:
Mineral property interests	$	41,595
Cash and cash equivalents		177
Other current assets		86
Other assets		312
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		(288)
Reclamation obligations		(570)
Deferred income tax liabilities		(2,154)
	$	39,158

Table of Contents

MCEWEN MINING INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

September 30, 2017

(tabular amounts are in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise noted)

The Mineral property interests acquired include a ~~required initial deposit of 10% ($0.5 million), which is included in Other Assets~~100% interest in the ~~Consolidated Balance Sheet.~~Buffalo Ankerite, Fuller and Davidson Tisdale deposits and a 61% interest in the Paymaster deposit all located in Timmins, Ontario. The remaining 39% interest in the Paymaster property is held by Goldcorp Inc., a joint venture partner. Certain properties are also subject to a net profit interest (“NPI”) in the 10-20% range, payable to an unrelated third party.

NOTE 1416 SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

Acquisition of ~~Lexam VG Gold Inc. (“Lexam”)~~Black Fox

On ~~April 26,~~October 6, 2017, the Company ~~completed~~announced the completion of the acquisition of ~~100% of the issued~~certain assets and ~~outstanding common shares of Lexam~~liabilities from Primero by the way of the ~~Arrangement~~Asset Purchase Agreement (“Agreement”) dated ~~February 13, 2017~~August 25, 2017. The assets primarily include the Black Fox mine site, mill, property, plant and equipment and adjacent exploration properties located in Township of Black River‐Matheson, Ontario, Canada. The liabilities primarily include reclamation obligations and certain assumed contracts related ~~Plan of Arrangement (the “Arrangement”).~~to the acquired assets. Pursuant to the ~~Arrangement, each common share of Lexam was exchanged for 0.056 of a common share of~~Agreement, the Company acquired these assets and each option to purchase a common share of Lexam was exchanged for a replacement option entitling the holder to acquire 0.056 share of the Company’s common stock. A total 12,281,295 shares of the Company’s common stock and 405,740 subscription receipts was issued at closing and Lexam became a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company.

The Company’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Robert R. McEwen, was also the non-executive Chairman of Lexam and he or his affiliates were principal shareholders of Lexam. In order to comply with NYSE rules, Mr. McEwen was not entitled to receive shares of the Company’s common stockliabilities in exchange for ~~his Lexam Shares in an amount representing more than 1%~~cash consideration of the issued and outstanding shares of the Company without obtaining the prior approval of the Company’s shareholders. As a result, an affiliate of Mr. McEwen was issued subscription receipts at the closing of the Arrangement and the Company’s shareholders are expected to vote on whether to approve the issuance of additional shares upon conversion of the subscription receipts at the 2017 annual meeting. $27.5 million.

Each subscription receipt issued at the closing will automatically convert into one additional share of the Company’s common stock upon receipt of approval from the Company’s shareholders at the annual meeting scheduled for May 25, 2017. If the shareholders do not approve the issuance of the additional shares, the subscription receipts will convert into the right to receive a sum of cash based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date immediately preceding the annual meeting. If the subscription receipts are converted into common stock, the amount of the Company’s common stock issued in connection with the Arrangement would be approximately 4% of the outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock immediately preceding the effective date of the Arrangement.

The Company concluded that the acquired assets and assumed liabilities ~~do not~~ constitute a “business” under U.S. GAAP and accordingly, the acquisition will be accounted for as a business combination rather than an asset ~~acquisition rather than a business combination. Transaction costs associated with~~acquisition. Due to the timing of the acquisition ~~totaling $0.8 million were capitalized~~being completed subsequent to ~~Other Non-Current Assets for~~ the ~~Consolidated Balance Sheet at March 31, 2017.~~period end, the determination of the fair values of the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed had not been finalized, so the allocation of the purchase price among those assets and liabilities could not be determined.

1722

~~Table of Contents~~

Item 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

In the following discussion, “McEwen Mining”, the “Company”, “we”, “our”, and “us” refers to McEwen Mining Inc. and as the context requires, its consolidated subsidiaries.

The following discussion updates our plan of operation as of November 2, 2017, for the foreseeable future. It also analyzes our financial condition at ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2017 and compares it to our financial condition at December 31, 2016. ~~The~~Finally, the discussion ~~also~~ analyzes our results of operations for the three and nine months ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2017 and compares those to the results for the three and nine months ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2016. With regard to properties or projects that are not in production, we provide ~~an update~~some details of our plan of operation. We suggest that you read this discussion in conjunction with MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS and our audited consolidated financial statements contained in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.

The discussion also presents certain Non-GAAP financial performance measures, such as earnings from mining operations, total cash costs, total cash cost per ounce, all-in sustaining costs, all-in sustaining cost per ounce, and average realized price per ounce, that are important to management in its evaluation of our operating results and which are used by management to compare our performance to what we perceive to be our peer group of mining companies and relied on as part of management’s decision-making process. Management believes these measures may also be important to investors in evaluating our performance. For a detailed description of each of the Non-GAAP financial performance measures and certain limitations inherent in such measures, please see the discussion under “Non-GAAP Financial Performance Measures” below, on page ~~30.~~37.

Reliability of Information: Minera Santa Cruz S.A. (“MSC”), the owner of the San José Mine, is responsible for and has supplied to us all reported results from the San José Mine. The financial and technical information contained herein is, with few exceptions as noted, based entirely on information provided to us by MSC. Our joint venture partner, a subsidiary of Hochschild Mining plc, and its affiliates other than MSC do not accept responsibility for the use of project data or the adequacy or accuracy of this information.

~~Table of Contents~~

Overview

We were organized under the laws of the State of Colorado on July 24, 1979. Since inception, we have been engaged in the exploration for, development of, production and sale of gold and silver, and with the acquisition of the Los Azules project in 2012, exploration for copper. We own and operate the producing El Gallo 1 ~~Mine~~mine in Sinaloa, Mexico. We ~~also~~ own a 49% interest in MSC, owner and operator of the producing San José Mine in Santa Cruz, Argentina. We also own the Gold Bar Project in Nevada, United States; the ~~El Gallo 2 project in Mexico, the~~ Los Azules Project in San Juan, Argentina, the Black Fox Complex and other projects in Timmins in Ontario, Canada, and a ~~large~~ portfolio of exploration properties in Argentina, Mexico and the United States.

In this report, “Au” represents gold; “Ag” represents silver; “oz” represents troy ounce; “gpt” represents grams per metric tonne; “ft.” represents feet; “m” represents meter; “km” represents kilometer; “sq.” represents square; and C$ refers to Canadian dollars. All of our financial information is reported in United States (U.S.) dollars, unless otherwise noted.

Index to Management’s Discussion and ~~Analysis:~~Analysis

Operating and Financial Highlights

Highlights for the ~~first~~third quarter of 2017 are included below and discussed further in Results of Consolidated ~~Operations:~~Operations and elsewhere in this MD&A:

Following the end of the quarter, on October 6, 2017, we announced the completion of the acquisition of the Black Fox Complex, enhancing our growth strategy in the Timmins region, that started with the acquisition of Lexam earlier in 2017.

On September 22, 2017, we completed a financing for gross proceeds of $46.6 million primarily for the purpose of funding the acquisition of Black Fox.

We continue to advance the permitting process at Gold Bar, with substantial advance as of quarter-end, as planned, with the expectation to begin its development by the end of 2017.

We completed a Preliminary Economic Assessment (“PEA”) for the Los Azules Project, estimating robust economics and the expectation for a high margin, rapid pay-back, and long-life open pit mine at current copper, gold and silver prices.

We reported ~~$14.8~~$13.4 million in gold and silver sales from the sale of ~~12,147~~10,580 gold equivalent ounces by our El Gallo 1 mine.

We realized average prices of ~~$1,220~~$1,269 and ~~$17.54~~$17.46 per ounce of gold and silver, respectively, sold by the El Gallo 1 mine, and ~~$1,253~~$1,281 and ~~$18.18~~$16.70 per ounce of gold and silver, respectively, sold by the San José mine.

The El Gallo 1 mine ~~reported production of 9,808~~produced 7,213 gold equivalent ounces, comprised of ~~9,730~~7,189 ounces of gold and ~~5,794~~1,789 ounces of silver.

The San José mine ~~reported production of 40,664~~produced 44,560 gold equivalent ounces, comprised of ~~21,155~~24,208 ounces of gold and ~~1,463,211~~1,526,449 ounces of silver, based on a 100% ~~basis,~~basis; or ~~19,925~~21,834 gold equivalent ounces, represented by ~~10,366~~11,862 ounces of gold and ~~716,973~~747,960 ounces of silver, based on the 49% basis attributable to us.

The El Gallo 1 mine ~~reported~~realized total cash costs of ~~$564~~$832 and all-in sustaining costs of ~~$668~~$946 per gold equivalent ounce, respectively.

~~Table of Contents~~

The San José mine ~~reported~~realized total cash costs of ~~$915~~$850 and all-in sustaining costs of ~~$1,165~~$1,065 per gold equivalent ounce, respectively.

We ~~spent $8.4 million in exploration activities, particularly at the Los Azules project.~~

We reported a net loss of ~~$3.0~~$8.1 million, or ~~$0.01~~$0.03 per share for the quarter.

~~Income~~The loss from our investment in MSC was ~~$0.2~~$0.5 million, ~~for the quarter,~~ and we received ~~$2.5~~$2.3 million in dividends during the three months ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2017.

As of ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2017, we reported ~~$55.1~~$82.3 million in cash, investments and precious metals valued at the London P.M. Fix spot price and no ~~short-term bank~~ indebtedness(1).

On April 26, 2017, we completed the acquisition of Lexam VG Gold Inc. With this strategic acquisition, we add several assets located in the mining district of Timmins, Ontario, bringing the potential for development expansion through exploration.

(1)

For a reconciliation of precious metals valued at the London P.M. Fix spot price and cost, please see the discussion under “Non-GAAP Financial Performance Measures” below, on page ~~30.~~37.

Selected Financial and Operating Results

The following table summarizes selected financial and operating results of our Company for the three and nine months ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2017 and 2016:


	Three months ended				Three months ended				Nine months ended
	March 31,				September 30,				September 30,
	2017		2016		2017		2016		2017		2016
	(in thousands, except otherwise stated)				(in thousands, unless otherwise indicated)
Gold and silver sales	$	14,833	$	21,190	$	13,430	$	13,423	$	43,373	$	49,226
Income on investment in MSC, net of amortization	$	190	$	4,963
(Loss) income on investment in MSC, net of amortization					$	(462)	$	4,693	$	(535)	$	13,789
Net (loss) income	$	(3,018)	$	12,985	$	(8,072)	$	4,208	$	(12,800)	$	25,546
Net (loss) income per common share	$	(0.01)	$	0.04	$	(0.03)	$	0.01	$	(0.04)	$	0.09
Consolidated gold ounces(1):
Produced		20		29		19.1		24.3		61.3		81.1
Sold		22		30		21.9		23.0		69.1		75.7
Consolidated silver ounces(1):
Produced		723		674		750		916		2,252		2,465
Sold		699		829		735		968		2,304		2,637
Consolidated gold equivalent ounces(1)(2):
Produced		30		38		29.0		36.5		91.4		114.0
Sold		31		41		31.7		35.9		99.8		110.8
Silver : gold ratio(2)		75 : 1		75 : 1		75 : 1		75 : 1		75 : 1		75 : 1

(1)

Includes the portion attributable to us from our 49% interest in the San José Mine.

(2)

Silver production is presented as a gold equivalent. ~~The silver to gold ratio used for 2017 and 2016 is 75:1.~~

~~Table of Contents~~

Consolidated Performance

For the ~~period~~three months ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2017, we reported a net loss of ~~$3.0~~$8.1 million, or ~~$0.01~~$0.03 per share, compared to net income of ~~$13.0~~$4.2 million or ~~$0.04~~$0.01 per share for the ~~first~~third quarter in 2016. The decline in operations period over period was mainly due to the $0.5 million net loss from our investment in MSC, compared to $4.7 million income reported in the comparable period of 2016, coupled with a $2.2 million increase in production costs applicable to sales from our El Gallo 1 mine, and a $1.5 million increase in general and administrative expenses incurred in the 2017 quarter.

During the three months ended September 30, 2017, MSC reported a net loss of $0.5 million, compared to net income of $4.7 million in 2016. The net loss reported in the third quarter of 2017 was mainly ~~due to a $6.4 million~~driven by the 18% decrease in ~~sales~~the number of gold equivalent ounces sold by MSC in that period. Despite the net loss, MSC paid us a dividend of $2.3 million in the quarter.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2017, our net loss was $12.8 million or $(0.04) per share, compared to net income of $25.5 million or $0.09 per share for the same period in 2016. The net loss in 2017 was the result of lower number of gold ounces sold at higher production costs, mainly from an increased strip ratio of waste to ore mined and ~~silver by our~~the higher volume of waste mined, when compared to the prior period. Further, processing costs increased from the mechanical failure on the crushing circuit at El Gallo 1 ~~mine, coupled with a $6.7~~mine. In addition, the $8.3 million increase in exploration ~~costs, primarily related~~expenses incurred mainly at our Los Azules project and the loss reported by MSC in the period further contributed to the ~~drilling campaign performed at the Los Azules project.~~consolidated net loss reported in 2017.

During the first quarter of 2017, net income from our investment in MSC decreased to $0.2 million, from $5.0 million in 2016. Unusual storms damaged port facilities from which doré from San José is shipped, adversely affecting sales during the quarter. Despite the decrease in net income, MSC continued a strong operating performance that resulted in a dividend payment of $2.5 million to us.

Results of Consolidated Operations

Three months ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2017 compared to 2016

Revenue. Gold and silver sales for the quarter ended September 30, 2017 remained at $13.4 million, unchanged from the 2016 period, with a 5% increase in gold equivalent ounces sold being offset by a 5% and 10% decrease in the average realized prices of gold and silver, respectively, at our El Gallo 1 mine.

Production costs applicable to sales. Production costs applicable to sales at the El Gallo 1 mine increased to $8.6 million in the three months period ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2017, compared to $6.4 million in 2016. Processing costs increased during the quarter due to an increased strip ratio of waste to ore, and a higher number of tonnes of waste moved in 2017. Furthermore, additional costs were incurred to bring the crushing circuit back to operations after the mechanical failure which occurred at the end of July. Production costs also increased as a result of the 3% increase in the number of tonnes processed during the period. Further, production costs denominated in Mexican peso have increased in line with the appreciation of the Mexican peso against the U.S. dollar, during the 2017 period.

Operating income (expenses)

Mine development costs, which relate to engineering and development expenditures incurred at our advanced-stage properties, increased to $1.4 million for the three months period ended September 30, 2017 from $0.9 million in the 2016 period, in line with our continuing our activities to develop Gold Bar into a producing property.

Exploration costs in the third quarter of 2017 increased to $2.4 million from $2.2 million in 2016. The slight increase is due to exploration activities at the recently acquired Timmins project. For a detailed discussion on exploration costs, please refer to the each of the segments sections below.

General and administrative expenses increased to $4.7 million in 2017 from $3.2 million in 2016, mainly as a result of costs associated with the Black Fox acquisition, coupled with expenses associated with higher personnel costs. The appreciation of the Canadian dollar against the U.S. dollar in the third quarter of 2017 also contributed to the increase in general and administrative expenses when compared to 2016.

MSC reported net loss of $0.5 million in the three months ended September 30, 2017, compared to net income of $4.7 million in 2016 due to the 18% decrease in the number of gold equivalent ounces sold in the quarter, coupled with the 3% and 17% decrease in the average realized prices of gold and silver, respectively, when compared to 2016. Please refer to the section Results of Operations – MSC below, for further details.

Other (expenses) income

During the three months ended September 30, 2017, we reported other expense of $1.9 million compared to other income of $0.6 million in the prior period. The decline was the result of $0.7 million increase in unrealized loss on derivatives, $0.4 million increase in loss from foreign exchange, and $0.4 write-off of marketable securities recognized in the quarter.

Income tax recovery

In the three months ended September 30, 2017, we reported income tax recovery of $0.6 million unchanged from the same period of 2016, as a combined result of fluctuations in tax benefits related to exploration spending at Los Azules, the

Argentine peso devaluation and the unrealized gains in the value of our investments recorded through Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income during the period.

Nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to 2016

Revenue. Gold and silver sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 decreased to ~~$14.8~~$43.4 million, from ~~$21.2~~$49.2 million in 2016 due to a ~~33%~~13% decrease in gold equivalent ounces sold during the nine month period at our El Gallo 1 mine, partially offset by a 4%1% and ~~20%~~4% increase in the average realized prices of gold and silver, respectively. The decrease in the number of gold equivalent ounces sold was in line with the decrease in production reported in the ~~first quarter.~~period. Based on our mine plan, we expect production to increase ~~production towards~~in the ~~second half~~final quarter of 2017.

Production costs applicable to sales. Production costs applicable to sales at the El Gallo 1 mine ~~decreased~~increased to ~~$7.0~~$24.2 million in the ~~period~~nine months ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2017, compared to ~~$9.1~~$21.2 million in ~~2015, due to~~2016. Despite the ~~33%~~13% decrease in ~~the number of~~ gold equivalent ounces sold ~~mentioned above, partly offset by~~in the period, production costs were higher ~~costs per ounce resulting from~~as a result of the higher number of tonnes processed coupled with the lower average grades processed and a higher strip ratio of waste to ore being mined. Further, the effect of the appreciation of the Mexican peso against the U.S. dollar over the peso denominated balances during 2017, along with the malfunction of the crushing system previously mentioned also contributed to the increase in the production costs in the period.

Operating Income (Expenses)

Mine development costs ~~which relate to engineering and development expenditures incurred at our advanced-stage properties,~~ increased to ~~$1.1~~$3.2 million for the ~~three~~nine months ~~period~~ ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2017 from ~~$0.7~~$2.9 million in the 2016 period, due to ~~$0.3~~$0.7 million ~~higher~~increase in expenditures ~~incurred~~ in ~~Nevada.~~Nevada partly offset by a $0.4 million decrease in expenditures at the El Gallo 2 project. Please refer to each of the ~~Advanced-stage properties section~~segments sections below for a complete discussion on these costs.

Exploration costs in the ~~first quarter of~~period ended September 30, 2017 increased by ~~$6.7~~$8.3 million to ~~$8.4~~$13.9 million from ~~$1.7~~$5.6 million in 2016. The increase is mainly due to ~~$6.0~~$6.5 million higher exploration expenditures incurred at the Los Azules project, coupled with ~~$0.7~~$1.5 million higher exploration costs incurred in Mexico. ~~For a complete discussion on exploration costs, please refer to the Exploration properties section below.~~

General and administrative expenses increased to ~~$4.3~~$13.1 million in 2017 from ~~$2.8~~$8.6 million in 2016, ~~mainly as~~due to higher regulatory and compliance fees, acquisition costs and a ~~result of~~ higher overhead from the development of Gold Bar and the advancement of Los Azules, as well as changes to senior management that occurred in the second half of 2016, which contribute to the increase on a period-over-period basis. The appreciation of the Mexican peso and Argentina peso against the U.S. dollar in the first quarter of 2017, also contributed to the increase in general and administrative expenses,personnel costs, when compared to ~~2016.~~the 2016 period.

~~Income~~In the nine months ended September 30, 2017, we recognized a net loss of $0.5 million from our investment in MSC, ~~decreased~~compared to ~~$0.2~~net income of $13.8 million in ~~2017, from $5.0 million~~the same period in 2016 due to a decrease in revenue from lower gold and silver ~~sales,~~ounces sold at lower average realized prices, coupled with higher production costs applicable to sales from the increase in ~~head count and labour~~labor expenditures ~~and the appreciation of the Argentina peso against the U.S. dollar, compared to the same period of 2016.~~associated with additional labor. Please refer to the section Results of Operations – MSC below, for further details.

~~Table of Contents~~

Other income (expenses)

Other income ~~increased~~decreased to ~~$1.8~~$1.0 million in the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2017 from ~~$0.7~~$2.1 million in the same period of 2016, mainly due to a ~~$1.8~~$1.3 million decrease in the unrealized gain on ~~derivative instruments, partly offset by lower currency gain and interest and other income (expense)~~derivatives reported induring the ~~prior quarter.~~period.

~~Recovery of income taxes~~Income tax recovery

~~Recovery of income taxes increased to $2.7~~We recovered $3.1 million in income tax in the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2017, ~~from $1.9~~compared to $3.3 million in 2016, ~~mainly due~~as a result of fluctuations in tax benefits related to ~~$1.1 million income tax recovery to offset~~increased exploration spending at Los Azules, the Argentine peso devaluation and the unrealized ~~gain~~gains in the value of our investments recorded through ~~other comprehensive income.~~Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income during the period.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2017, we had working capital of ~~$58.3~~$82.7 million, consisting of ~~$81.7~~$108.5 million of current assets and ~~$23.4~~$25.8 million of current liabilities. Our cash balance ~~decreased~~increased from $37.4 million at December 31, 2016 to ~~$28.9~~$69.0 million at ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2017, mainly as a result of the $43.2 million net proceeds received from the equity offering closed on

September 22, 2017. The purpose of the offering was to secure funding for the acquisition of the Black Fox Complex, previously announced for an ~~increase in~~initial price of $35.0 million. On October 6, 2017, we closed the acquisition with a cash ~~used in operating activities, partly offset by a decrease in cash used in~~payment of $27.5 million, after certain price adjustments. The remaining funds from the financing ~~activities.~~ supplement our treasury for future capital projects, exploration at Black Fox, and general corporate purposes.

We believe that our working capital at ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2017 is sufficient to satisfy ~~any~~ obligations due in the next 12 months, and to fund ongoing operations ~~development~~ and corporate activities over ~~the next 12 months.~~that period.

The Company continues to evaluate capital and development expenditure requirements to advance Gold Bar, Black Fox, our other Timmins projects, and El Gallo 2, as well as exploration expenditures for all our operations and projects. If we make a positive ~~construction~~ decision ~~and develop either~~to pursue one or more of our advanced-stage properties, Gold Bar or El Gallo 2, we will need to raise additional capital of approximately $60 million or $150 million, respectively (under existing estimates), given that each property’s estimated capital coststhese initiatives, the expenditures incurred may significantly exceed our ~~available~~ working capital. In such case, we would explore several financing methods, ~~to complete the required development and construction stages,~~ which may include incurring debt, issuing additional equity, equipment leasing, and other forms of financing. ~~Our ability to build either the Gold Bar or the El Gallo 2 projects is dependent on one or several of the alternatives being considered.~~

~~Net~~For the nine months ended September 30, 2017, net cash used in operations was ~~$6.9~~$9.2 million ~~in the three months ended March 31, 2017,~~ compared to net cash provided by ~~operations~~operation of ~~$14.7~~$24.4 million for the same period in 2016. The significant ~~changes quarter over quarter include:~~change resulted from:

Increase in cash paid to suppliers and employees to $60.0 million, compared to $37.4 million in 2016, from higher exploration and production costs, compared to the prior period;

$~~14.8~~43.4 million cash received from gold and silver sales in the nine months ended September 30, 2017, compared to ~~$20.3~~$48.3 million in ~~2016, resulting from~~ the ~~lower number~~same period of ~~ounces sold during 2017, previously mentioned.~~2016;

Decrease in collection of VAT in Mexico to ~~$0.4~~$1.6 million in the ~~first quarter of~~nine months ended September 30, 2017, compared to ~~$6.8~~$9.5 million in the same period of ~~2016.~~2016; and

~~Increase~~Decrease in ~~other assets related~~dividends received from our investment in MSC to ~~operations, including inventory items, of $3.9~~$7.2 million ~~during the first quarter of 2017.~~in 2017, compared to $13.3 million in 2016.

Cash provided by investing activities was $0.4 million for the nine months period of 2017, compared to cash used in investing activities ~~decreased to $0.3~~of $8.1 million in ~~2017, from $0.6 million in~~the same period of 2016, mainly due ~~to reduced property acquisitions.~~to:

No mineral property acquisitions for the 2017 period, for which the consideration was payable in cash, compared to $6.0 million spent in the 2016 period;

~~We used $1.5~~

$2.2 million proceeds from the sale of marketable securities during the nine months ended September 30, 2017, compared to $0.5 million in 2016;

No investments in marketable securities, compared to $2.5 million used for investing in 2016, and

$0.8 million incurred in the acquisition of Lexam, completed in 2017, compared to $nil in 2016.

Cash provided by financing activities was $40.2 million in 2017, compared to ~~$5.5~~cash used in financing activities of $3.5 million in 2016, primarily as a result of:

~~$1.5~~Gross proceeds of $42.5 million ~~return~~received from the issuance of ~~capital~~shares and an additional $4.1 million from issuing warrants in connection with the equity offering completed on September 22, 2017; the cost associated to ~~our shareholders in 2017, compared to $1.5 million in 2016.~~the issuance of shares and warrants was $3.4 million;

$nil repayment of the bank credit facility obtained by our Mexican subsidiary, compared to $3.4 million repaid in 2016; ~~and~~

$nil share repurchase for the ~~first quarter of~~nine months ended September 30, 2017, compared to $0.6 million in share repurchases in the same period of ~~2016.~~2016; and

2228

~~Table of Contents~~

~~Results~~

$0.1 million proceeds from stock options exercised in 2017, compared to $3.5 million proceeds from options exercised in 2016.

We continued our shareholders distributions in 2017, in the form of ~~Operations —~~ a return of capital, paying $0.01 per share in the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Mexico Segment

The Mexico Segment includes the El Gallo 1 mine, the El Gallo 2 advanced-stage project, and exploration properties neighboring the El Gallo area.

El Gallo 1 mine

El Gallo 1 mine is ~~a gold~~an operating ~~unit,~~mine, 100% owned by us. The mine is located in Sinaloa, Mexico.

The El Gallo 1 mine is a mature operation, of which ~~has~~we have mined and depleted various pits during its operating life. The current operations are producing from ~~lower grade~~higher waste stripping deeper, sulfide transitional deposits typical of late stage operations. Exploration work is ongoing in an effort to replace production and extend the asset life beyond 2018.

Overview

The following table ~~outlines~~sets out production ~~totals,~~and sales totals, total cash ~~costs,~~ and all-in sustaining cash costs (on a gold equivalent basis) for the El Gallo 1 mine for the three ~~month period~~and nine months ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2017 and 2016:


	Three months ended				Three months ended				Nine months ended
	March 31,				September 30,				September 30,
	2017		2016		2017		2016		2017		2016
	(in thousands, except otherwise stated)				(in thousands, unless otherwise indicated)
Tonnes of mineralized material mined		225		220		170		193		789		702
Average grade gold (gpt)		1.2		2.1		2.70		0.83		1.57		1.42
Tonnes of mineralized material processed		309		250		278		270		904		787
Average grade gold (gpt)		1.3		3.6		2.53		1.40		1.78		2.42
Gold ounces:
Produced		10		20		7.2		11.8		26.6		47.3
Sold		12		18		10.5		10.0		34.5		39.5
Silver ounces:
Produced		6		6		1.8		7.2		12.5		21.4
Sold		11		6		6.0		4.0		22.0		16.6
Gold equivalent ounces(1):
Produced		10		20		7.2		11.8		26.8		47.6
Sold		12		18		10.6		10.1		34.7		39.7
Net sales	$	14,833	$	21,190	$	13,430	$	13,423	$	43,373	$	49,226
Average realized price ($/ounce)(2):
Gold	$	1,220	$	1,171	$	1,269	$	1,335	$	1,248	$	1,238
Silver	$	17.54	$	14.64	$	17.46	$	19.25	$	17.41	$	16.69
London average price ($/ounce):
P.M. Fix Gold					$	1,278	$	1,335	$	1,251	$	1,260
Fix Silver					$	16.84	$	19.61	$	17.16	$	17.12
Silver : gold ratio(1)		75 : 1		75 : 1		75 : 1		75 : 1		75 : 1		75 : 1

(1)

Silver production is presented as a gold equivalent. ~~The silver to gold ratio used for 2017 and 2016 is 75:1.~~

(2)

Average realized ~~prices~~price is a non-GAAP financial performance measure with no standardized definition under U.S. GAAP. See “Non-GAAP Financial Performance Measures”, on page 3037 for additional information, including definitions of this term.

~~Gold and silver production~~

Production for the quarter ended March 31, 2017 decreased to 9,808 gold equivalent ounces, from 20,101 gold equivalent ounces in the comparable period in 2016, primarily due to lower average grades mined and processed, which decreased from an average 3.62 g/t for the first quarter of 2016 to an average 1.28 g/t in the same period of 2017. Average grades processed were lower than in 2016, since we continue mining from our remaining lower grade pit; whereas in the first quarter of 2016, we processed higher grade ore stockpiled at the end of 2015. The decrease in production was expected, and in line with our current production plan, which contemplates the increase in the number of gold equivalent ounces produced towards the second half of 2017.

2329

~~Table of Contents~~

~~Tonnes mined represent tonnes of ore extracted, while tonnes processed represent tonnes of ore crushed~~Gold and placed on the leach pads. The difference between tonnes mined of 225,409 and tonnes processed of 309,472 correspond to ore previously mined which was consumed from the stockpiled inventory. Due to long process cycles, actual recoveries from the heap are difficult to measure and may fluctuate significantly based on the timing, quantity and metallurgical attributes of new mineralized material placed on the leach pads, among other variables. The cumulative recovery rate realized for goldsilver production ~~from September 1, 2012 (start of production at the El Gallo 1 Mine) to March 31, 2017 is estimated at 60%~~

Production for the quarter ended September 30, 2017 decreased to 7,213 gold equivalent ounces, from 11,849 gold equivalent ounces in the comparable period in 2016, primarily due to a serious mechanical failure at the end of July that removed the crushing circuit from operation for most of the month of August. As a result, we were unable to crush and place fresh ore on the leach pad, for most of August.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2017, El Gallo 1 mine produced 26,800 gold equivalent ounces, compared to 47,590 gold equivalent ounces in the same period of 2016. The decrease in production was expected, as we commenced mining from the higher stripping deeper pits, with an increased amount of sulfide transitional mineralization during 2017. However, the operational issues affecting the crushing circuit during the third quarter of 2017 resulted in production being lower than initially forecasted. Accordingly, we have added a portable crusher to increase the normal crushing capacity available for the remainder of the year, to compensate for the production shortfall during the fourth quarter of 2017.

Tonnes mined represent tonnes of ore extracted, while tonnes processed represent tonnes of ore crushed and placed on the leach pads. The difference between tonnes mined of 788,573 and tonnes processed of 903,730 correspond to ore previously mined which was consumed from the stockpiled inventory. Due to long process cycles, actual recoveries from the heap are difficult to measure and may fluctuate significantly based on the timing, quantity and metallurgical attributes of new mineralized material placed on the leach pads, among other variables. The cumulative recovery rate realized for gold production from September 1, 2012 (start of production at the El Gallo 1 mine) to September 30, 2017 is estimated at 58%.

Gold and silver sales

Revenue from the sale of gold and silver at our El Gallo 1 mine ~~decreased by 30% to $14.8~~remained at $13.4 million in the ~~first~~third quarter of 2017 compared to ~~$21.2 million for~~ the same period in 2016, due to a ~~33% decrease~~5% increase in the number of ~~ounces of~~ gold equivalent ounces sold, ~~partly~~ offset by 4%a 5% and ~~20% increase~~10% decrease in the average realized prices of gold and silver, ~~during the period,~~ respectively.

~~The average realized price~~For the nine months period ended September 30, 2017, revenue from sale of gold ~~was $1,220 in~~and silver at the ~~2017 period, compared~~El Gallo 1 mine decreased by 12% to ~~$1,171~~$43.4 million, from $49.2 million in the same period of ~~2016. In comparison, the~~2016, due to a 13% decrease in gold equivalent ounces sold in 2017, slightly offset by a 1% and 4% increase in average ~~London P.M. fix price for~~realized prices of gold ~~during the first quarter of 2017 was $1,219 per ounce,~~and silver, respectively, when compared to ~~$1,183 per ounce for the same period in~~ 2016.

Further, the average realized price of silver was $17.54 in the 2017 period, compared to $14.64 in 2016. In comparison, the average London P.M. fix price for silver during the first quarter of 2017 was $17.42 per ounce, compared to $14.85 per ounce for the same period in 2016.

Total Cash Costs and All-In Sustaining Costs

The following table presents a summary of our total cash cost, cash cost per ounce, all-in sustaining costs and all-in sustaining costs per ounce of gold equivalent at the El Gallo 1 mine:


					Three months ended				Nine months ended
	March 31,				September 30,				September 30,
	2017		2016		2017		2016		2017		2016
	(in thousands, except otherwise stated)					(in thousands, unless otherwise stated)
Total cash costs(1)	$	6,846	$	7,816	$	8,799	$	6,008	$	24,134	$	19,210
Total cash cost per gold equivalent ounce sold ($/ounce)(1)(2)	$	564	$	432	$	832	$	598	$	695	$	483
All‑in sustaining costs(1)	$	8,112	$	9,627	$	10,008	$	6,837	$	28,248	$	22,203
All‑in sustaining cost per gold equivalent ounce sold ($/ounce)(1)(2)	$	668	$	532	$	946	$	680	$	813	$	559
Silver : gold ratio(2)		75 : 1		75 : 1		75 : 1		75 : 1		75 : 1		75 : 1

(1)

Total cash cost, total cash cost per ounce, all-in sustaining costs, and all-in sustaining costs per ounce are non‑GAAP financial performance measures with no standardized definition under U.S. GAAP. See “Non‑GAAP Financial Performance Measures” on page 3037 for additional information, including definitions of this term.

(2)

Silver production presented as a gold equivalent. Gold equivalent ounces calculations are based on prevailing spot prices at the beginning of the year. ~~The silver to gold ratio used for 2017 and 2016 was 75:1.~~

~~2017 compared to 2016~~

Total cash costs per gold equivalent ounce for the ~~El Gallo 1 Mine for the~~ quarter ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2017 were ~~$564~~$832 compared to ~~$432~~$598 for the same period in 2016. The increase in total cash costs per gold equivalent ounce is ~~primarily due~~the result of a higher strip ratio of waste to ~~lower average grades~~ore, higher volume of ~~ore processed,~~waste moved and additional costs incurred to bring the crushing circuit back to operations after the mechanical failure which occurred at the end of July, and the ~~appreciation~~addition of a second contract crushing circuit to increase crushing capacity for the remainder of the ~~Mexican Peso against~~year, coupled with the ~~US dollar, partly offset by lower extraction and input costs based on contracts renegotiated with certain vendors~~3% increase in ~~2017.~~the number of tonnes processed during

the period. On an aggregate basis, total cash costs at the El Gallo 1 ~~Mine decreased by 12%~~mine increased to ~~$6.8~~$8.8 million in 2017 from ~~$7.8~~$6.0 million in the 2016 ~~period, due to overall lower mine and~~period. Further, production costs ~~resulting from higher~~denominated in Mexican peso have increased in line with the appreciation of the Mexican peso against the U.S. dollar, when compared to 2016.

Total cash costs per gold equivalent ounce for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 were $695 compared to $483 for the nine months period of 2016. On an aggregate basis, total cash costs at the El Gallo 1 mine increased by 26% to $24.1 million in the nine months of 2017, compared to $19.2 million in the nine months of 2016. Higher total cash costs per gold equivalent ounce were the result of the decrease in average grades processed, increase in the strip ratio of waste to ore, and the increase in the number of ~~ounces sold~~tonnes processed which overall increased the processing cost incurred in the period. Further, costs from ~~inventoried materials which partly offset~~mining the ~~lower number of ounces sold produced from mined material~~Central 2 and Lupita pits are higher since they are located at a ~~temporary~~greater distance than Samaniego pit. In addition, the increase in ~~mined waste required~~peso denominated production costs from the appreciation of the Mexican peso against the U.S. dollar also contributed to ~~expose mineralized material.~~the higher total cash costs reported, when compared to 2016.

All-in sustaining costs for the quarter ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2017 were ~~$668~~$946 per gold equivalent ounce, compared to ~~$532~~$680 per gold equivalent ounce in the same period in 2016.

~~Table of Contents~~

On an aggregate basis, all-in sustaining costs ~~decreased by 16%~~increased to ~~$8.1~~$10.0 million for the three ~~month~~months period ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2017 from ~~$9.6~~$6.8 million in the 2016 ~~period,~~period. In addition to higher production costs discussed above, all-in sustaining costs also increased due to higher ~~sales~~on-site exploration and capital expenditures incurred in the quarter as part of ~~ounces produced from inventoried materials, partly offset by lower ounces mined, short term increased waste mining and higher exploration expenses. Despite~~ the ~~decrease in aggregate~~plan to extend the mine life of the El Gallo 1 mine.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2017, the El Gallo 1 mine reported all-in sustaining costs of $813 per gold equivalent ounce, compared to $559 in the same period of 2016. Aggregate all-in sustaining costs ~~on a per ounce basis~~from the El Gallo 1 mine for the nine months period in 2017 also increased, ~~by 22%~~to $28.2 million from $22.2 million in 2016, due to ~~a reduction~~higher exploration and capital expenditures incurred in Mexico, from our initiatives to extend the ~~number~~life of ~~gold equivalent ounces sold, over which~~ the ~~all-in sustaining costs are spread.~~mine, noted above.

For 2017, we ~~have~~ budgeted a total of ~~$2.0~~$3.3 million for sustaining and capital expenditures activities, from which we have spent ~~$0.1~~$1.1 million during the ~~first quarter~~nine months ended of 2017.

Advanced-stage Properties - El Gallo 2

El Gallo 2 Project

As a result of changes in commodity prices since the publication of the technical report titled “El Gallo Complex Phase II Project, NI 43-101 Technical Report, Feasibility Study, Mocorito Municipality, Sinaloa, Mexico” with an effective date of September 10, 2012 (the “2012 Report”), we are of the view that there is no current feasibility study in respect of the El Gallo 2 project. We believe that the figures set out in the 2012 Report are historical and should not be relied on.

During the ~~first~~third quarter of 2017, we spent ~~$0.2~~$0.3 million on studies for the advancement of feasibility and development of the El Gallo 2 project. These studies ~~intend~~are designed to identify opportunities to reduce initial capital investment required to start the project and ~~seek~~ to reduce operating costs while minimizing the impact on production. Potential changes include different mill configurations, mine plans, and tailings deposition methods. ~~The $180~~

A review of the $180.0 million of capital expenditures ~~required~~estimated in the El Gallo 2 initial feasibility study ~~has not been updated~~is currently underway. The revised feasibility study is expected to ~~reflect these possible changes.~~be completed by December 2017.

Our 2017 budget for the El Gallo 2 is approximately ~~$6.5~~$4.9 million, including ~~$3.4~~$2.0 million for exploration and ~~$3.1~~$2.9 million for the advancement of feasibility and development. During the ~~quarter~~three and nine months ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2017 we have incurred $0.1 million and $1.2 million in exploration, respectively; and $0.3 million and $0.6 million in ~~exploration and $0.2 million~~the advancement of feasibility and ~~development.~~development of the El Gallo 2, respectively.

Exploration Activities – Mexico

El Gallo area, Sinaloa, México

~~We are exploring at the~~The El Gallo area ~~with~~is being explored to extend life of mine, to assess and expand known zones of mineralization and to generate new drill targets within the ~~objective of determining the prospects of the properties that we hold in areas adjacent to the El Gallo 1 mine and the El Gallo 2 advanced-stage property.~~district for significant new discoveries.

During the ~~quarter, comprehensive digital evaluation~~three months ended September 30, 2017, a multi-element soil geochemical survey was carried out over two large high priority target areas, which were identified based on results of all ~~geochemistry, geophysics, mapping and drill exploration data was~~available geo-information including new spectral study completed resulting in a recommendation of high probability exploration areas of interest to evaluate. From this, we have identified a number of areas to follow up on including further detailed surface mapping, rock sampling, soil sampling and reverse circulation and core drilling if warranted.

During the quarter, we acquired a small mobile reverse circulation drill rig capable of conducting reconnaissance drilling with a minimal footprint, to work in the area adjacent to the El Gallo, and accelerate exploration drilling activities at lower costs.

~~For 2017, we have budgeted a total of $1.8 million for exploration~~ at the El Gallo area, including areas located close to the existing facilities (El Cobre, El Chorro, Dos Amigos). We are also pursuing areas further afield including the Tescalama and Mapiri areas that have historical, artisanal mining activities noted along with anomalous rock and soil geochemistry from primary phase exploration. As of March 31, 2017, $0.9 million have been spent in exploration in the El Gallo area.

Infill drilling is to take place in areas with known resources or mineralization including the Mina Grande and El Encuentro areas. Mina Grande area where exploration drilling results continue to return potentially promising values which could expand the mineralized material known there. Ongoing reviewend of the ~~resistivity survey from last year is expected to identify potential areas to follow up with other geophysical methods such as Induced Polarisation (“IP”).~~

second quarter. Drilling continued around the mine site, focusing on the north-west extension of the Samaniego open pit and on the Lupita-Central trend. Additionally, the reverse-circulation drilling

2531

~~Table~~

was in operation around the mine site and on new targets identified from the soil geochemical survey in the area surrounding El Gallo 2.

For 2017, a total of ~~Contents~~$4.2 million has been budgeted for exploration, including near-mine and district scale exploration. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, $1.1 million and $3.0 million have been spent on exploration in the El Gallo Complex area, respectively.

Results of ~~Operations—~~Operations - MSC ~~Segment~~

The MSC segment is composed of the San José mine, located in Argentina.

MSC (on a 100% basis)

~~Overview~~

The following table ~~outlines~~sets out production ~~totals,~~and sales totals, total cash ~~costs~~ and all-in sustaining costs (on a co-product and gold equivalent basis) for the San José Mine on a 100% basis for the three ~~month period~~and nine months ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2017 and ~~2016, presented on a 100% basis.~~2016. Also, included at the bottom of the table are ~~certain~~the production figures reported on a 49% attributable ~~basis, representing our interest.~~basis.


	Three months ended				Three months ended				Nine months ended
	March 31,				September 30,				September 30,
	2017		2016		2017		2016		2017		2016
	(in thousands, except otherwise stated)				(in thousands, except otherwise stated)
San José Mine—100% basis
Tonnes of ore mined		108		108		135		140		375		387
Average grade (gpt):
Gold		6.9		7.0		7.2		6.7		7.0		6.7
Silver		502		527		496		522		479		520
Tonnes of ore processed		115		102		138		140		388		389
Average grade (gpt):
Gold		6.5		6.3		6.4		6.4		6.5		6.3
Silver		458		470		406		469		425		454
Average recovery (%):
Gold		88.0		89.0		86.3		87.9		87.2		88.2
Silver		86.4		88.4		85.1		87.6		86.1		87.8
Gold ounces:
Produced		21		18		24.2		25.6		70.8		69.1
Sold		20		23		23.2		26.5		70.7		73.8
Silver ounces:
Produced		1,463		1,362		1,526		1,855		4,570		4,987
Sold		1,405		1,681		1,489		1,967		4,657		5,347
Gold equivalent ounces(1):
Produced		41		36		44.6		50.3		131.8		135.6
Sold		39		46		43.1		52.7		132.8		145.1
Net sales	$	48,343	$	52,072	$	52,722	$	72,116	$	161,900	$	182,769
Gross average realized price ($/ounce)(2):
Gold	$	1,253	$	1,257	$	1,281	$	1,323	$	1,259	$	1,287
Silver	$	18.18	$	15.29	$	16.70	$	20.13	$	17.02	$	17.96
London average price ($/ounce):
P.M. Fix Gold					$	1,278	$	1,335	$	1,251	$	1,260
Fix Silver					$	16.86	$	19.61	$	17.16	$	17.12
Silver : gold ratio(1)		75 : 1		75 : 1		75 : 1		75 : 1		75 : 1		75 : 1
McEwen Mining—49% basis
Ounces produced:
Gold		10		9		11.9		12.5		34.7		33.8
Silver		717		667		748		909		2,239		2,444
Gold equivalent(1)		20		18		21.8		24.7		64.6		66.4

(1)

Silver production is presented as a gold equivalent. ~~The silver to gold ratio used for 2017 and 2016 was 75:1.~~

(2)

Average realized ~~prices~~price is a non-GAAP financial performance measures with no standardized definition under U.S. GAAP. See “Non-GAAP Financial Performance Measures”, on page 3037 for additional information, including definitions of these terms.

~~Table of Contents~~

Gold and silver production

~~Gold~~The 11% decrease in gold equivalent production at the San José Mine for the three months ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2017 ~~increased~~was driven by ~~16% in 2017~~slightly lower number of tonnes mined and processed as well as lower average grades of silver obtained for the ore processed, when compared to ~~21,155~~2016. In addition, unusual lower temperatures during July affected the mine to stockpile surface ore haulage and processing of the stockpile, creating deficiencies at

the plant and reducing the tonnes processed and with it the number of gold and silver ounces ~~while silver production increased by 7% to 1,463,211 ounces. Using a silver to gold ratio of 75:1, the José Mine~~ produced ~~40,664 gold equivalent ounces~~ in the ~~first quarter of 2017, compared to 36,443 gold equivalent ounces in the same period of 2016.~~quarter.

~~The increase in~~For the ~~number of ounces of~~nine months ended September 30, 2017, gold ~~and silver produced during~~equivalent production at San Jose Mine decreased 3% when compare to the ~~first quarter of 2017 resulted from a 13% increase in~~2016 period, due to the ~~number of tonnes processed in 2017, coupled with 4% higher average grades of gold. The overall increase was partly offset by a 3%~~ decrease in average grades of silver processed partly offset by the increase in the average grades of gold processed during the ~~quarter. Further, during the first quarter~~period.

Using a silver to gold ratio of ~~2017 there was no work stoppage at~~75:1, the San José ~~mine, compared~~Mine produced 44,560 and 131,762 gold equivalent ounces in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, respectively. This compares to ~~a few days of stoppage that occurred~~50,301 and 135,550 gold equivalent ounces in ~~2016.~~ the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively.

Gold and silver sales

For the three months ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2017, net sales decreased by ~~7% to $48.3 million from $52.1 million for~~27% as a result of decreases of 12% and 24% in the ~~same period in 2016, due to a lower~~ number of ounces of gold and silver sold in the third quarter of 2017, ~~partly offset by higher~~respectively. The decrease in net sales was also the result of lower average realized ~~price of silver during the period.~~

The number of ounces of gold sold decreased by 15% in 2017, to 20,023 ounces from 23,461 ounces of gold sold in 2016. The number of ounces of silver sold decreased by 16% in 2017, to 1,404,783 ounces compared to 1,680,845 ounces of silver sold in 2016. The overall lower number of ouncesprices of gold and silver ~~sold~~obtained during the period in 2017, ~~was the result of unusual storms that occurred in March 2017, which damaged the Comodoro Rivadavia port facilities causing MSC to postpone~~ ~~doré shipments until early April 2017.~~

~~The average realized price for gold sold in the first quarter of 2017, after mark-to-market provisional price adjustments, remained comparable to 2016 at $1,253 per ounce~~when compared to ~~$1,257 per ounce sold. In comparison, the average London P.M. fix price for gold during the first quarter of 2017 was $1,219 per ounce, compared to $1,183 per ounce for the same period in~~ 2016.

~~The average realized price for~~For the nine months ended September 30, 2017, net sales decreased by 11%, as a result of the decrease of 4% and 13% in the number of ounces of gold and silver sold in the ~~first quarter~~nine months period of 2017, ~~after mark-to-market provisional price adjustments, was $18.18 per ounce, an increase~~coupled with a 2% and 5% decrease in average realized prices of ~~19% compared to an average of $15.29 per ounce sold in the same period in 2016. In comparison, the average London P.M. fix price for~~gold and silver, during the ~~first quarter of 2017 was $17.42 per ounce, compared to $14.85 per ounce for the same~~ period, ~~in 2016.~~respectively.

The difference between the average gross realized sale price per ounce of gold and silver sold by MSC and the average London fix prices noted above is due to adjustments of certain provisionally priced shipments of concentrates. Certain sales are ‘provisionally priced’ where the selling price is subject to final adjustment at the end of a period, normally ranging from 30 to 90 days after the start of the delivery process, based on the market price at the relevant quotation point stipulated in the contract. Sales revenue on provisionally priced sales of concentrates is recognized based on estimates of the final pricing receivable, which in turn are based on relevant forward market prices. At each reporting date, provisionally priced metal is marked to market based on the forward selling price for the quotational period of the sales contract. Since silver prices were rising during the quarter, provisional pricing resulted in higher realized prices than the London fix.

~~Table of Contents~~

Total Cash Costs and All‑In Sustaining Costs

The following table presents a summary of the total cash cost, cash cost per ounce, all-in sustaining costs and all-in sustaining costs per ounce of gold equivalent at the San José mine, on a 100% and 49% basis:


	Three months ended				Three months ended				Nine months ended
	March 31,				September 30,				September 30,
	2017		2016		2017		2016		2017		2016
	(in thousands, unless otherwise indicated)				(in thousands, unless otherwise indicated)
San José mine - 100% basis
Total cash costs(1)	$	35,470	$	34,939	$	36,625	$	37,276	$	118,968	$	111,674
All‑in sustaining costs(1)		45,155		42,937		45,889		44,775		147,157		137,667

San José mine - 49% basis
Total cash costs(1)	$	17,380	$	17,119	$	17,948	$	18,264	$	58,294	$	54,720
Total cash costs per ounce sold ($/ounce)(1):
Gold	$	889	$	811	$	868	$	797	$	900	$	760
Silver	$	12.58	$	9.46	$	11.05	$	8.23	$	11.89	$	10.40
Gold equivalent(2)	$	915	$	762	$	850	$	707	$	896	$	770
All‑in sustaining costs(1)	$	22,126	$	21,038	$	22,487	$	21,941	$	72,106	$	67,457
All‑in sustaining costs per ounce sold ($/ounce)(1):
Gold	$	1,132	$	997	$	1,088	$	957	$	1,113	$	937
Silver	$	16.01	$	11.63	$	13.85	$	9.88	$	14.71	$	12.81
Gold equivalent(2)	$	1,165	$	936	$	1,065	$	850	$	1,109	$	949
Silver : gold ratio(2)		75 : 1		75 : 1		75 : 1		75 : 1		75 : 1		75 : 1

(1)

Total cash costs, total cash cost per ounce, all‑in sustaining costs,and all-in sustaining costs per ounce are non‑GAAP financial performance measures with no standardized definition under U.S. GAAP. See “Non‑GAAP Financial Performance Measures” on page 3037 for additional information, including definitions of these terms.

(2)

Silver production is presented as a gold equivalent. Gold equivalent ounces calculations are based on prevailing spot prices at the beginning of the year. ~~The silver to gold ratio used for 2017 and 2016 was 75:1.~~

On a 100% basis, total cash costs per gold equivalent ounce sold by MSC in the ~~first~~third quarter of 2017 increased by 20% to ~~$915~~$850 from ~~$762~~$707 in the same period of 2016, as the net result of a lower number of ounces sold and higher production costs applicable to sales due to higher labor costs, higher on-site general and administration costs, and the ~~significant~~impact of inflation, partly offset by the devaluation of the Argentina peso against the U.S. dollar.

On an aggregate basis, total cash costs decreased by 2% to $36.6 million in 2017 from $37.3 million in the third quarter of 2016, as the net result of the 18% decrease in gold equivalent ounces sold in the quarter, offset by the overall increase in production costs applicable to sales for the reasons previously described.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2017, on a 100% basis, total cash costs per gold equivalent ounce sold by MSC increased by 16% to $896 from $770 in the nine months period of 2016, due to higher production costs applicable to sales due to higher labor costs, partly offset by the decrease in commercial discounts and refining, smelting and transportation costs. In addition, during the nine months of 2017, MSC sold a lower number of gold equivalent ounces, ~~sold, over~~ which ~~aggregate cash costs are spread.~~also contributed to the increase of the per ounce cost, when compared to 2016.

On an aggregate basis, total cash costs increased by 2%7% to ~~$35.5 million in 2017 from $34.9~~$119.0 million in the ~~first quarter~~nine months ended September 30, 2017, from $111.7 million during the nine months period in 2016. Despite the 9% decrease in gold equivalent ounces sold, total cash costs for the nine months period of ~~2016,~~2017 increased as a result of higher production costs applicable to sales driven by higher labor costs and the impact of inflation, partly offset by the devaluation of the Argentina peso against the U.S. dollar. Labor costs are higher in 2017 due to the combined effect of salary increases and additions to the labor force at the mine added early in the year. Further, higher total cash costs were also the result of the increase in on-site general and administrative expenses, partly offset by lower commercial discounts and lower refining, smelting and transportation costs, ~~coupled with lower commercial discounts, which were partly offset by higher productions costs applicable~~compared to ~~sales, royalty and production taxes, and general and administrative expenses incurred in~~ the ~~quarter.~~2016 period.

For the quarter ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2017, on a per ounce basis, all-in sustaining costs increased to $1,065 per gold equivalent ounce, compared to $850 per gold equivalent ounce in the same period in 2016. On an aggregate basis, all-in sustaining costs increased from $44.8 million to $45.9 million, due to higher capital expenditures and on-site exploration expenses, partly offset by a decrease in capitalized stripping and underground mine development costs incurred in the period.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2017, on a per ounce basis, all-in sustaining costs also increased to ~~$1,165~~$1,109 per gold equivalent ounce, ~~in the 2017 period,~~ compared to ~~$936~~$949 per gold equivalent ounce in the same period in ~~2016, based on a silver to gold ratio of 75:1 for both periods.~~2016. On an aggregate basis, all-in sustaining costs increased from ~~$42.9~~$137.7 million to ~~$45.2~~$147.1 million in 2017, due to higher on-site exploration expenses aligned with MSC’s program to extend the life of the mine, partly offset by a decrease in capitalized stripping and underground mine development costs ~~and capital expenditures.~~incurred in the period.

~~Investment in~~ MSC Dividend Distribution (49%)

We report $0.2 million net income from our 49% attributable share of operations of MSC in 2017, compared to income of $5.0 million in 2016. The $0.2 million net income for the quarter ended March 31, 2017 is net of the amortization of the fair value increments arising from the purchase price allocation recorded as part of the acquisition of Minera Andes of $2.1 million and related deferred income tax recovery of $0.1 million.

~~Table of Contents~~

Included in the income tax recovery is the impact of fluctuations in the exchange rate between the Argentina peso and the U.S. dollar on the peso‑denominated deferred tax liability associated with the investment in MSC recorded as part of the acquisition of Minera Andes.

~~A summary of the financial results of MSC, including our 49% attributable share of operations from our investment in MSC, for the three months period ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, is as follows:~~

For the Three months ended

March 31,

2017

2016

(in thousands)

Minera Santa Cruz S.A. (100% basis)

Net sales

$
48,343

$
52,072

Production costs applicable to sales

(36,699)

(37,727)

Net income

4,381

8,248

Portion attributable to McEwen Mining Inc. (49% basis)

Net income

$
2,147

$
4,042

Amortization of fair value increments

(2,069)

(3,682)

Income tax recovery

112

4,603

Income from investment in MSC, net of amortization

$
190

$
4,963

During the three and nine months ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2017, we received ~~$2.5~~$2.3 million and $7.1 million in dividends from MSC, ~~which compares~~respectively, compared to ~~$2.6~~$7.9 million and $13.3 million in dividends received during the same period in 2016. On October 26, 2017, we received a $2.5 million dividend payment from MSC.

For more details on our Investment in MSC, refer to Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, Investment in Minera Santa Cruz S.A. (“MSC”) — San José Mine.

~~Results of Operations – Nevada Segment~~USA Segment

The ~~Nevada~~USA segment is ~~composed~~comprised of the Gold Bar project, ~~our~~an advanced-stage property located in Nevada, U.S. and other early stage exploration ~~projects. Early~~properties. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, we spent $0.4 million and $1.3 million in early stage exploration activities such as field mapping and geochemical reconnaissance work ~~was also conducted~~ in various areas in Nevada where ~~the Company has properties or considers~~we consider that exploration potential ~~may exist.~~exists.

Advanced-stage Properties – Gold Bar Project

Gold Bar is located primarily on public lands managed by the BLM. We have targeted this project for an open pit, heap leach operation allowing for construction to potentially begin in late 2017 and achieve production in late 2018, depending upon the completion of the ongoing permitting process.

During the three and nine months ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2017, we spent ~~$0.5~~$1.3 million ~~in exploration in Nevada,~~ and ~~$0.9~~$2.9 million on engineering and environmental works required to progress the permitting process and prepare for project ~~construction.~~construction, respectively.

Key developments at Gold Bar during the ~~quarter were:~~nine months ended September 30, 2017 included:

~~The initiation~~Approval of critical state permits from the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection (“NDEP”) has been received from the Bureau of Air Pollution Control for the Mercury Operating Permit to Construct, the Class I Air Quality Permit to Construction/Operating Permit, the Class II Air Quality Operating Permit. In addition, the Water Pollution Control Permit and ~~subsequent closing~~Reclamation Permit from the NDEP Bureau of Mining Reclamation and Regulation are expected early in the fourth quarter of 2017 following the conclusion of the ~~45-day public comment period on April 17, 2017. All public comments received will be addressed and incorporated into the final Environmental Impact Statement;~~regulatory appeal period.

~~Applications~~Awarded key contracts to the principal General Contractor, for ~~other critical permits, such~~major earthworks, as-well as the ~~Water Pollution Control~~project Engineer of Record; and ~~the Air Quality Control Permit, continue to progress which will authorize construction, operation, and closure of the approved mining facilities;~~

~~Engineering designs continue to progress as well~~Awarded key purchase orders for long-lead critical items, such as the ~~initiation of formal request for quotations for long lead capital items;~~ADR process plant equipment and power generation units.

~~Table~~On October 6, 2017, we received a Notice of ~~Contents~~Availability of the Final Environmental Impact Statement, issued by the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”). We expect the Record of Decision (“RoD”) to be published during early in the fourth quarter of 2017, once the regulated 30-day review waiting period is completed. Development of the Gold Bar project will begin upon receipt of the RoD. We expect to award contracts for the remaining capital equipment in the fourth quarter of 2017.

~~Continued principal General Contractor and primary earthworks group engagement to ensure accurate cost estimation and construction feasibility confirmation;~~

~~We expect to receive a Record of Decision and initiate construction during the second half of 2017.~~

~~Results of Operations—~~Los Azules Segment

The Los Azules segment is composed of the Los Azules project, a copper exploration project located in San Juan, Argentina.

~~Los Azules Project~~

We had budgeted $9.6 million for the 2016-2017 exploration season at Los Azules, ~~from~~at which we spent ~~$6.3~~$7.1 million during the first half of 2017, and an additional $0.4 million during the three months ended September 30, 2017. During the third quarter ~~ended March 31,~~of 2017 we completed the Preliminary Economic Assessment (“PEA”), results of which were announced on September 7, 2017. Various study related activities including improved definition topographical surveys over larger areas were conducted to evaluate siting of facilities and offsite infrastructure such as access routes which are required to update project studies.The complete PEA is available electronically at our website at www.mcewenmining.com.

Timmins Segment

The ~~main activities performed were:~~Timmins segment is composed of the recently acquired Black Fox Complex and other gold exploration properties located in Timmins, Ontario, Canada.

Timmins Properties

A combination of infill and exploration drilling, along with some other exploration advancement expenditures. Results from the drilling campaign are expected to be finalized during the second half of 2017.

~~Some early stage geotechnical drilling at the mine and a potential mine tailings dam.~~

~~Performance of an aerial survey of the proposed mining area, mine facility areas and potential linear infrastructure areas.~~

~~Site evaluations of potential site access routes, power transmission routes and concentrate logistics.~~

~~Environmental base line monitoring work.~~

~~Geotechnical reconnaissance for materials for use in project construction such as concrete aggregates, sand and road surfacing materials.~~

On April 26, 2017, we completed the acquisition of Lexam. With this strategic acquisition, we added several assets including the Fuller, Davidson-Tisdale, Buffalo Ankerite, and Paymaster projects, bringing the potential for development expansion through exploration.

Evaluation work and trade-off studies are currently underway to prioritize exploration work on the properties.

Black Fox Complex

On October 6, 2017, we announced the completion of the acquisition of the Black Fox Complex, which consists of the fully operational Black Fox gold mine, the Black Fox-Stock mill, and the Grey Fox and Froome advanced-stage exploration projects.

The Black Fox underground gold mine was initially operated from 1997 to 2001. It was re-commissioned in 2009 and has operated continuously since then, producing a total of 821,000 ounces of gold initially from an open pit, now depleted, and subsequently from the underground mine. The Black Fox property is located along a prime 4.5 mile (7 km) section of the Destor-Porcupine Fault, which is host to many world-class gold deposits. The property is already well-endowed with

gold mineralization and has very attractive geological potential. We are evaluating potential synergies between the Black Fox Complex and our other Timmins properties.

Underground exploration and definition drilling programs are currently underway with the objective to upgrade and expand resources in the Deep Central, High Quartz Vein, Far West and Far East Zones, at depths ranging from approximately 1,640 ft. to 2,788 ft. (500 m to 850 m).

Planned exploration drilling will also focus on expanding the gold resources to depth at the Black Fox mine and the Froome deposit, which is located 800 m West of the mine. The Froome deposit is currently drilled to a depth of 1,148 ft. (350 m) and remains open at depth. Multiple other exploration targets exist on the Black Fox and Stock properties. These targets will be ranked during the fourth quarter of 2017, to begin drilling in 2018.

Non-GAAP Financial Performance Measures

In this report, we have provided information prepared or calculated according to U.S. GAAP, as well as ~~provided~~ some Non-U.S. GAAP (“Non-GAAP”) financial performance measures. Because the Non-GAAP performance measures do not have any standardized meaning prescribed by U.S. GAAP, they may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other companies. These measures should not be considered in isolation or as substitutes for measures of performance prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. There are material limitations associated with the use of such Non-GAAP measures. Since these measures do not incorporate, among other things, changes in working capital and non-operating cash costs, they are not necessarily indicative of operating profit or loss, or cash flow from operations as determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP.

Earnings from Mining Operations

The term Earnings from Mining Operations used in this report is a Non-GAAP financial measure. We use and report this measure because we believe it provides investors and analysts with a useful measure of the underlying earnings from our mining operations.

We define Earnings from Mining Operations as Gold and Silver Sales from our El Gallo 1 mine and our 49% attributable share of the San José mine’s Net Sales, less their respective Production Costs Applicable to Sales. To the extent that Production Costs Applicable to Sales may include depreciation and amortization expense related to the fair value

~~Table of Contents~~

increments on historical business acquisitions (fair value paid in excess of the carrying value of the underlying assets and liabilities assumed on the date of acquisition), we exclude this expense in order to arrive at Production Costs Applicable to Sales that only include depreciation and amortization expense incurred at the mine site level. The San José mine Net Sales and Production Costs Applicable to Sales are presented, on a 100% basis, in Note 65 of the accompanying financial statements.

The following table presents a reconciliation of Earnings from Mining Operations to Gross Profit, a GAAP financial measure.


	Three months ended				Nine months ended
	September 30,				September 30,
	2017		2016		2017		2016
	(in thousands)
El Gallo 1 Mine earnings from mining operations
Gold and silver sales	$	13,430	$	13,423	$	43,373	$	49,226
Production costs applicable to sales		(8,649)		(6,409)		(24,193)		(21,239)
Depreciation of mining related assets		(155)		(137)		(599)		(346)
Gross profit		4,626		6,877		18,581		27,641
Add: Amortization related to fair value increments on historical acquisitions included in Production Costs Applicable to Sales		449		701		1,514		1,845
El Gallo 1 Mine earnings from mining operations		5,075		7,578		20,095		29,486

San José earnings from mining operations (49% basis)
Net sales		25,834		35,337		79,331		89,557
Production costs applicable to sales		(21,362)		(24,179)		(65,028)		(61,693)
San José earnings from mining operations		4,472		11,158		14,303		27,864

Three months ended

March 31,

2017

2016

(in thousands)

El Gallo 1 Mine earnings from mining operations

Gold and silver sales

$
14,833

$
21,190

Production costs applicable to sales

(6,984)

(9,067)

Depreciation of mining related assets

(152)

(95)

Gross profit

7,697

12,028

Add: Amortization related to fair value increments on historical acquisitions included in Production Costs Applicable to Sales

533

322

El Gallo 1 Mine earnings from mining operations

8,230

12,350

San José earnings from mining operations (49% basis)

Net sales

23,688

25,515

Production costs applicable to sales

(17,983)

(18,486)

San José earnings from mining operations

5,705

7,029

Total Cash Costs and All‑In Sustaining Costs

The terms total cash costs, total cash cost per ounce, all‑in sustaining costs, and all‑in sustaining cost per ounce used in this report are non‑GAAP financial measures. We report these measures to provide additional information regarding ~~operational~~operating efficiencies on an individual mine basis (San José mine and El Gallo 1 mine), and believe these measures provide investors and analysts with useful information about our underlying costs of operations. For the San José mine, we exclude the share of gold or silver production attributable to the controlling interest.

Total cash costs consists of mining, processing, on‑site general and administrative expenses, community and permitting costs related to current operations, royalty costs, refining and treatment charges (for both doré and concentrate products), sales costs, export taxes and operational stripping costs, and exclude depreciation and amortization. The sum of these costs is divided by the corresponding gold equivalent ounces sold during the period to determine a per ounce amount.

All‑in sustaining costs consists of total cash costs (as described above), plus environmental rehabilitation costs and amortization of the asset retirement costs related to operating sites, sustaining exploration and development costs, and sustaining capital expenditures. Our all-in sustaining costs exclude the allocation of corporate general and administrative costs. The sum of these costs is divided by the corresponding gold equivalent ounces sold during the period to determine a per ounce amount.

Costs excluded from total cash costs and all‑in sustaining costs are income tax expense, all financing charges, costs related to business combinations, asset acquisitions and asset disposal, and any items that are deducted for the purpose of normalizing items.

For MSC, co‑product total cash costs and all‑in sustaining costs are calculated by dividing the respective proportionate share of the total cash costs and all‑in sustaining costs for each metal sold for the period by the ounces of each respective metal sold. The respective proportionate share of each metal sold is calculated based on their pro‑rated sales value. Approximately ~~50%~~53% of the value of the sales in the ~~first quarter~~nine months of 2017 was derived from gold and ~~50%~~47% was derived from silver, which compared to ~~53%~~47% and ~~47%~~53%, respectively, for the same period in 2016.

~~Table of Contents~~

The following tables reconcile these non‑GAAP measures to the most directly comparable GAAP measure, Production Costs Applicable to Sales. Total cash costs, all‑in sustaining costs, and ounces of gold and silver sold for the San José mine are provided to us by ~~MSC.~~MSC:


	Three months ended				Three months ended				Nine months ended
	March 31,				September 30,				September 30,
	2017		2016		2017		2016		2017		2016
	(in thousands, except per ounce)				(in thousands, except per ounce)
El Gallo 1 mine cash costs
Production costs applicable to sales	$	6,984	$	9,067	$	8,649	$	6,409	$	24,193	$	21,239
Less: Depreciation		(533)		(322)		(449)		(701)		(1,514)		(1,845)
Less: Pre‑stripping costs for future pit access		—		(1,346)		—		—		—		(1,346)
On‑site general and administrative expenses		385		406		589		289		1,435		1,140
Property holding costs		10		11		10		11		20		22
Total cash costs, El Gallo 1 mine	$	6,846	$	7,816	$	8,799	$	6,008	$	24,134	$	19,210
Gold equivalent ounces sold:		12,147		18,101		10,580		10,053		34,743		39,747
El Gallo 1 mine cash costs per gold equivalent ounce sold	$	564	$	432	$	832	$	598	$	695	$	483

Three months ended

March 31,


2017

2016


(in thousands, except per ounce)

San José mine cash costs (49% basis)

Production costs applicable to sales

$
17,983

$
18,486

Less: Operating site reclamation accretion and amortization

(138)

(349)

Depreciation

(4,018)

(5,684)

On‑site general and administrative expenses

1,112

815

Refining, smelting, and transportation

783

1,636

Commercial discounts

1,605

2,193

Community costs related to current operations

53

22

Total cash costs

$
17,380

$
17,119

McEwen's share of San José mine gold equivalent ounces sold

18,989

22,477

Total cash costs, MSC

$
915

$
762


	Three months ended				Nine months ended
	September 30,				September 30,
	2017		2016		2017		2016
	(in thousands, except per ounce)
San José mine cash costs (49% basis)
Production costs applicable to sales	$	21,408	$	23,472	$	65,073	$	61,693
Less: Operating site reclamation accretion and amortization		(168)		(441)		(471)		(1,232)
Depreciation		(6,432)		(7,264)		(16,302)		(19,125)
On‑site general and administrative expenses		1,021		995		3,178		2,873
Refining, smelting, and transportation		818		1,912		2,441		4,611
Commercial discounts		1,264		(466)		4,251		5,769
Community costs related to current operations		37		56		124		131
Total cash costs	$	17,948	$	18,264	$	58,294	$	54,720
McEwen's share of San José mine gold equivalent ounces sold		21,110		25,823		65,048		71,099
Total cash costs, MSC	$	850	$	707	$	896	$	770

Reconciliation of All-In Sustaining Costs to Total Cash Costs


	Three months ended				Three months ended				Nine months ended
	March 31,				September 30,				September 30,
	2017		2016		2017		2016		2017		2016
	(in thousands, except per ounce)				(in thousands, except per ounce)
El Gallo 1 mine all-in sustaining costs
Total cash costs	$	6,846	$	7,816	$	8,799	$	6,008	$	24,134	$	19,210
Operating site reclamation accretion and amortization		81		214		81		277		244		724
On‑site exploration expenses		908		251		1,121		209		3,051		580
Capital expenditures (sustaining)		277		—		7		343		819		343
Pre‑stripping costs for future pit access		—		1,346		—		—		—		1,346
All‑in sustaining costs, El Gallo 1 mine	$	8,112	$	9,627	$	10,008	$	6,837	$	28,248	$	22,203
Gold equivalent ounces sold		12,147		18,101		10,580		10,053		34,743		39,747
El Gallo 1 mine all-in sustaining cost per gold equivalent ounce sold		668		532		946		680		813		559

~~Table of Contents~~


	Three months ended				Three months ended				Nine months ended
	March 31,				September 30,				September 30,
	2017		2016		2017		2016		2017		2016
	(in thousands, except per ounce)				(in thousands, except per ounce)
San José mine all-in sustaining costs (49% basis)
Total cash costs	$	17,380	$	17,119	$	17,948	$	18,264	$	58,294	$	54,720
Operating site reclamation accretion and amortization		138		349		168		442		471		1,232
On-site exploration expenses		607		36		701		298		2,268		689
Capitalised stripping & underground mine development		3,017		2,410		2,940		3,833		8,801		9,545
Less: depreciation		(299)		—		(325)		(1,608)		(984)		(1,608)
Capital expenditures (sustaining)		1,283		1,124		1,055		712		3,256		2,879
All‑in sustaining costs	$	22,126	$	21,038	$	22,487	$	21,941	$	72,106	$	67,457
McEwen's share of San José mine gold equivalent ounces sold		18,989		22,477		21,110		25,823		65,048		71,099
San José mine all-in sustaining cost per gold equivalent ounce sold	$	1,165	$	936	$	1,065	$	850	$	1,109	$	949

The following table summarizes the consolidated number of gold equivalent ounces sold:


	Three months ended March 31,			Three months ended September 30,		Nine months ended September 30,
	2017	2016		2017	2016	2017	2016
Gold equivalent ounces sold at El Gallo 1 Mine	12,147	18,101	Gold equivalent ounces sold at El Gallo 1 Mine	10,580	10,053	34,743	39,747
McEwen’s share of MSC gold equivalent ounces sold	18,989	22,477	McEwen’s share of MSC gold equivalent ounces sold	21,110	25,826	65,048	71,083
Consolidated gold equivalent ounces sold (including McEwen’s share of MSC)	31,136	40,578	Consolidated gold equivalent ounces sold (including McEwen’s share of MSC)	31,690	35,879	99,791	110,830
Silver : gold ratio	75 : 1	75 : 1	Silver : gold ratio	75 : 1	75 : 1	75 : 1	75 : 1

Average realized prices

The term average realized price per ounce used in this report is also a non‑GAAP financial measure. We report this measure to better understand the price realized in each reporting period for gold and silver.

Average realized price is calculated as gross sales of gold and silver (excluding commercial deductions) divided by the number of net ounces sold in the period (net of deduction units).

The following table reconciles this non‑GAAP measure to the most directly comparable U.S. GAAP measure, Sales of Gold and Silver. Ounces of gold and silver sold for the San José mine are provided to us by MSC.


	Three Months Ended				Three months ended				Nine months ended
	March 31,				September 30,				September 30,
	2017		2016		2017		2016		2017		2016
	(in thousands, except ounce and per ounce figures)				(in thousands, except ounce and per ounce figures)
El Gallo 1 mine average realized prices
Gold sales	$	14,640	$	21,108	$	13,325	$	13,346	$	42,990	$	48,949
Silver sales		193		82		105		77		383		277
Gold and silver sales	$	14,833	$	21,190	$	13,430	$	13,423	$	43,373	$	49,226
Gold ounces sold		12,000		18,026		10,500		10,000		34,450		39,526
Silver ounces sold		11,000		5,600		6,000		4,000		22,000		16,600
Gold equivalent ounces sold		12,147		18,101		10,580		10,053		34,743		39,747
Average realized price per gold ounce sold	$	1,220	$	1,171	$	1,269	$	1,335	$	1,248	$	1,238
Average realized price per silver ounce sold	$	17.54	$	14.64	$	17.46	$	19.25	$	17.41	$	16.69
Average realized price per gold equivalent ounce sold	$	1,221	$	1,171	$	1,269	$	1,335	$	1,248	$	1,238

~~Table of Contents~~


	Three months ended				Three months ended				Nine months ended
	March 31,				September 30,				September 30,
	2017		2016		2017		2016		2017		2016
	(in thousands, except ounce and per ounce figures)				(in thousands, except ounce and per ounce figures)
San José mine average realized prices (49% basis)
Gold sales	$	12,295	$	14,452	$	14,586	$	17,167	$	43,593	$	46,526
Silver sales		12,515		12,591		12,179		19,404		38,845		47,055
Gold and silver sales	$	24,810	$	27,043	$	26,765	$	36,571	$	82,438	$	93,581
Gold ounces sold		9,811		11,496		11,383		12,976		34,625		36,150
Silver ounces sold		688,344		823,614		729,491		963,778		2,281,730		2,619,993
Gold equivalent ounces sold		18,989		22,477		21,110		25,826		65,048		71,083
Average realized price per gold ounce sold	$	1,253	$	1,257	$	1,281	$	1,323	$	1,259	$	1,287
Average realized price per silver ounce sold	$	18.18	$	15.29	$	16.70	$	20.13	$	17.02	$	17.96
Average realized price per gold equivalent ounce sold	$	1,307	$	1,203	$	1,268	$	1,416	$	1,267	$	1,317

Cash, investments and precious metals

The term ~~“cash,~~cash, investments and precious ~~metals”~~metals used in this report is also a non‑GAAP financial measure. We report this measure to better understand our liquidity in each reporting period.

Cash, investments and precious metals is calculated as the sum of cash, investments and ounces of doré held in inventories with precious metals valued at the London PM Fix spot price at the corresponding period. The following table summarizes the calculation of cash, investments and precious metals amounts shown in this report:


	Three months ended				Nine months ended
	March 31,				September 30,
	2017		2016		2017		2016
	(in thousands)				(in thousands)
Cash	$	28,890	$	34,623	$	68,962	$	38,812
Investments		15,329		460		9,225		7,056
Precious Metals(1)		10,916		8,372		4,134		16,613
Total cash, investments and precious metals	$	55,135	$	43,455	$	82,321	$	62,481

(1)

Precious Metals is calculated using the number of ounces held in inventory at the end of the period, and valued at the London PM Fix spot

A reconciliation between precious metals valued at cost and precious metals valued at market value is described in the following table:


	Three months ended				Nine months ended
	March 31,				September 30,
	2017		2016		2017		2016
	(in thousands, except ounces and per ounce)				(in thousands, except ounces and per ounce)
Precious Metals (note 3 of the Consolidated Financial Statements)	$	5,059	$	2,192	$	2,328	$	4,975
Number of ounces of doré in inventory		8,768		6,768		3,222		12,557
London PM Fix, per ounce		1,245		1,237		1,283		1,323
Precious Metals valued at market value	$	10,916	$	8,372	$	4,134	$	16,613

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2017, we did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements (as that phrase is defined by SEC rules applicable to this report) which have or are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.

~~Table of Contents~~

Contingencies

We have surety bonds outstanding to provide bonding for our environmental reclamation obligations in the United States. These surety bonds are available for draw down in the event we do not perform our reclamation obligations. When the specific reclamation requirements are met, the beneficiary of the surety bonds will cancel and/or return the instrument to the issuing entity. As of ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2017, no liability has been recognized for our surety bonds of ~~$4.9~~$19.9 million.

Subsequent to the quarter, pursuant to the Black Fox acquisition, the Company increased its surety bond obligations by an additional $16.5 million (C$20.6 million). No liability has been recognized for these surety bonds.

Critical Accounting Policies

Critical accounting policies and estimates used to prepare the financial statements are discussed with our Audit Committee as they are implemented and on an annual basis.

There have been no significant changes in our Critical Accounting Policies since December 31, 2016.

Forward-Looking Statements

This report contains or incorporates by reference “forward‑looking statements”, as that term is used in federal securities laws, about our financial condition, results of operations and business. These statements include, among others:

statements about our anticipated exploration results, cost and feasibility of production, receipt of permits or other regulatory or government approvals and plans for the development of our properties;

statements concerning the benefits or outcomes that we expect will result from our business activities and certain transactions that we contemplate or have completed, such as receipt of proceeds, increased revenues, decreased expenses and avoided expenses and expenditures; and

statements of our expectations, beliefs, future plans and strategies, anticipated developments and other matters that are not historical facts.

These statements may be made expressly in this document or may be incorporated by reference to other documents that we will file with the SEC. You can find many of these statements by looking for words such as “believes”, “expects”, “anticipates”, “estimates” or similar expressions used in this report or incorporated by reference in this report.

Forward‑looking statements and information are based upon a number of estimates and assumptions that, while considered reasonable by management, are inherently subject to significant business, economic and competitive uncertainties, risks and contingencies, and there can be no assurance that such statements and information will prove to be accurate. Therefore, actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements and information.

~~Included among the forward-looking statements and information provided on this document is production guidance.~~ On an annual basis, we develop a consolidated budget, based on standalone budgets for each operating mine. In developing the mine production portion of the budget, we evaluate a number of factors and assumptions, which include, but are not limited to:

gold and silver price forecasts;

average gold and silver grade mined, using the resource model;

average grade processed by the crushing facility (El Gallo 1 mine) or milling facility (San José mine);

expected tonnes moved and strip ratios;

available stockpile material (grades, tonnes, and accessibility);

estimates of ore extraction efficiency and non-mineralized material diluting the ore being extracted from the orebodies;

~~Table of Contents~~

estimates of in process inventory (either on the leach pad or plant for the El Gallo 1 mine, or in the mill facility for the San José mine);

estimated leach recovery rates and leach cycle times (El Gallo 1 mine);

estimated mill recovery rates (San José mine);

dilution of material processed;

internal and contractor equipment and labor availability; and

seasonal weather patterns, particularly in Mexico.

Actual production results are sensitive to variances in any of the key factors and assumptions noted above. As a result, we frequently evaluate and reconcile actual results to budgeted results to ~~identify~~determine if key assumptions and estimates ~~requiring~~require modification. Any changes will, in turn, influence production guidance.

We caution you not to put undue reliance on these statements, which speak only as of the date of this report. Further, the information contained in this document or incorporated herein by reference is a statement of our present intention and is based on present facts and assumptions, and may change at any time and without notice, based on changes in such facts or assumptions. Readers should not place undue reliance on forward‑looking statements.

Risk Factors Impacting ~~Forward‑Looking~~Forward-Looking Statements

The important factors that could prevent us from achieving our stated goals and objectives include, but are not limited to, those set forth in the “Risk Factors” section in our report on Form 10-K and the following:

our ability to raise funds required for the execution of our business strategy;

our ability to secure permits or other regulatory and government approvals needed to operate, develop or explore our mineral properties and projects;

decisions of foreign countries, banks and courts within those countries;

unexpected changes in business, economic, and political conditions;

operating results of MSC;

fluctuations in interest rates, inflation rates, currency exchange rates, or commodity prices;

timing, quality of ore and amount of mine production;

our ability to retain and attract key personnel;

technological changes in the mining industry;

changes in operating, exploration or overhead costs;

access and availability of materials, equipment, supplies, labor and supervision, power and water;

results of current and future exploration activities;

results of pending and future feasibility studies or the expansion or commencement of mining operations without feasibility studies having been completed;

~~Table of Contents~~

changes in our business strategy;

interpretation of drill hole results and the geology, grade and continuity of mineralization;

the uncertainty of reserve estimates and timing of development expenditures;

litigation or regulatory investigations and procedures affecting us;

local and community impacts and issues including criminal activity and violent crimes;

accidents, public health issues, and labor disputes;

our continued listing on a public exchange;

adverse significant weather events affecting operations;

uncertainty relating to title to mineral properties;

negotiations with aboriginal groups affecting our efforts to explore, develop or produce gold and silver deposits in Ontario, and

changes in relationships with the local communities in the areas in which we operate.

We undertake no responsibility or obligation to update publicly these forward‑looking statements, except as required by law and may update these statements in the future in written or oral statements. Investors should take note of any future statements made by or on our behalf.

~~Table of Contents~~

Item 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK

Our exposure to market risks includes, but is not limited to, the following risks: changes in foreign currency exchange rates, equity price risks, commodity price fluctuations and credit risk. We do not use derivative financial instruments as part of an overall strategy to manage market risk.

Further, our participation in the joint venture with Hochschild for the 49% interest held at MSC creates additional risks because, among other things, we do not exercise ~~decision making~~decision-making power over the day-to-day activities at MSC; however, implications from our partner’s decisions may result in us having to provide additional funding to MSC or in a decrease in our percentage of ownership.

Foreign Currency Risk

While we transact most of our business in U.S. dollars, some expenses, including labor, operating supplies and property and equipment, are denominated in Canadian dollars, Mexican pesos or Argentina pesos. As a result, currency exchange fluctuations may impact our operating costs. The appreciation of non-U.S. dollar currencies against the U.S. dollar increases costs and the cost of purchasing property and equipment in U.S. dollar terms in Canada, Mexico and Argentina, which can adversely impact our operating results and cash flows. Conversely, a depreciation of non-U.S. dollar currencies usually decreases operating costs and property and equipment purchases in U.S. dollar terms in foreign countries.

Between 2008 and 2015, the Argentina peso steadily devaluated against the U.S. dollar by 10%-30% on an annual basis. Subsequently, the Argentina peso has continued devaluating however at a lower rate. In 2016 the peso devalued by 22%; while during the three and nine months ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2017, the Argentina peso ~~appreciated 2%.~~devalued by 4% and 9% against the US dollar, respectively.

Further, we are also subject to foreign currency risk on the fluctuation of the Mexican peso on our VAT receivable balance. As of ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2017, our VAT receivable balance was Mexican peso ~~119,401,765,~~143,615,840, equivalent to approximately ~~$6.3~~$7.9 million, for which a 1% change in the Mexican peso would have resulted in a gain/loss of $0.1 million in the Consolidated Statement of Operations and Comprehensive ~~Income~~ (Loss). Income.

During the three ~~month period~~months ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2017, the Mexican peso did not fluctuate significantly, whereas for the nine months period ended September 30, 2017, it appreciated ~~10%~~14% against the US dollar.

The value of cash and cash equivalents denominated in foreign currencies also fluctuates with changes in currency exchange rates. Appreciation of non-U.S. dollar currencies results in a foreign currency gain on such investments and a depreciation in non-U.S. dollar currencies results in a loss. We have not utilized material market risk-sensitive instruments to manage our exposure to foreign currency exchange rates but may do so in the ~~future actively manage our exposure to foreign currency exchange rate risk.~~future. We hold portions of our cash reserves in non-U.S. dollar currencies. Based on our Canadian cash balance of ~~$1.0~~$2.6 million (C$~~1.4~~3.2 million) at ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2017, a 1% change in the Canadian dollar would result in a gain/loss of ~~$0.01~~$0.03 million in the Consolidated Statement of Operations and Comprehensive ~~Income~~ (Loss). Income. We also hold negligible portions of our cash reserves in Mexican and Argentina pesos.

Equity Price Risk

We have in the past sought and will likely in the future seek to acquire additional funding by sale of common ~~stock or other equity securities.~~stock. Movements in the price of our common stock have been volatile in the past and may also be volatile in the future. As a result, there is a risk that we may not be able to sell ~~equity securities~~common stock at an acceptable price to meet future funding requirements.

We have invested and may continue to invest in shares of common stock of other entities in the mining sector. Some of our investments may be highly volatile and lack liquidity caused by lower trading volumes. As a result, we are inherently exposed to fluctuations in the fair value of our investments, which may result in gains or losses upon their disposal.

Commodity Price Risk

Changes in the price of gold and silver have in the past and could in the future significantly affect our results of operations and cash flows. ~~In addition, we~~We have in the past and may in the future hold a portion of our treasury in gold and silver bullion, which is recorded at the lower of cost or market. Gold and silver prices may fluctuate widely from time to time. Based on our revenues from gold and silver sales of ~~$14.8~~$43.4 million for the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2017 (exclusive of our

3844

~~Table of Contents~~

~~of our~~ investment in MSC), a 10% change in the spot ~~price~~prices of gold and silver ~~as of March 31, 2017~~during the period would have had an impact of approximately ~~$1.5~~$4.3 million on our revenues.

Credit Risk

We may be exposed to credit loss through our precious metals and doré sales agreements with Canadian financial institutions if these institutions are unable to make payment in accordance with the terms of the agreements. However, based on the history and financial condition of our counterparties, we do not anticipate any of the financial institutions to default on their obligation. As of ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2017, we do not believe we have any significant credit exposure associated with precious metals and our doré sales agreements.

In Mexico, we are exposed to credit loss regarding our VAT taxes receivable if the Mexican tax authorities are unable or unwilling to make payments in accordance with our monthly filings. Timing of collection on VAT receivables is uncertain as VAT refund procedures require a significant amount of information and follow-up. The risk is mitigated to the extent that the VAT receivable balance can be applied against future income taxes payable. However, at this time we are uncertain when, if ever, our Mexican operations will generate sufficient taxable operating profits to offset this receivable against taxes payable. We continue to face risk on the collection of our VAT receivables, which amount to ~~$6.3~~$7.9 million as at ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2017.

In Nevada and Canada, we are required to provide security to cover our projected reclamation costs. As at ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2017, we have surety bonds of ~~$4.9~~$19.9 million in place to satisfy bonding requirements for this purpose. Although we do not believe we have any significant credit exposure associated with these bonds, ~~we are exposed to credit loss regarding our deposit if the surety bond underwriter defaults on its coverage of the bond. There~~there is also the risk the surety bonds may no longer be accepted by the governmental agencies as satisfactory reclamation coverage, in which case we would be required to replace the surety bonding with cash.

In Ontario, Canada, pursuant to the Black fox acquisition, we are also required to provide security to cover our projected reclamation costs. As a result, subsequent to quarter end we increased our surety obligations by an additional $16.5 million (C$20.6 million) in place to satisfy bonding requirements in Ontario. Although we do not believe we have any significant credit exposure associated with these bonds, there is the risk that the surety bonds may no longer be accepted by the governmental agencies as satisfactory reclamation coverage, in which case we would be required to replace the surety bonding with cash.

Item 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

(a)We maintain a system of controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”), is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. As of ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2017, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, management has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

(b)Changes in Internal Controls. There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2017 that materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.

~~Table of Contents~~

PART II OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1A. RISK FACTORS

There have been no material changes from the risk factors disclosed in Part I, Item 1A, of our Form ~~10-K.~~

10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.

4045

~~Table of Contents~~

Item 6. EXHIBITS

The following exhibits are filed with this report:

~~31.1~~
31.1		Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for Robert R. McEwen.
31.2		Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for Andrew Elinesky.
32		Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for Robert R. McEwen and Andrew Elinesky.
101		The following materials from McEwen Mining Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2017 are filed herewith, formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive (Loss) Income ~~(Loss)~~ for the three and nine months ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2017 and 2016, (ii) the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2017 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2016, (iii) the Unaudited Consolidated Statement of Changes in Shareholder’s Equity for the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2017 and 2016, (iv) the Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2017 and 2016, and (v) the Unaudited Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

4146

~~Table of Contents~~

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


	MCEWEN MINING INC.

	/s/ Robert R. McEwen
Date: ~~May 4,~~November 2, 2017	~~By:~~By Robert R. McEwen,
	Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

	/s/ Andrew Elinesky
Date: ~~May 4,~~November 2, 2017	~~By:~~By Andrew Elinesky,
	Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

4247


	Page
Operating and Financial Highlights	1924
Selected Financial and Operating Results	2025
Consolidated Performance	2125
Results of Operations	26
Liquidity and Capital Resources	22
~~Results of Operations~~	2327
Mexico Segment	2329
El Gallo 1 mine operating results	2329
Advanced-stage Properties – El Gallo 2 project	2531
Exploration Properties – El Gallo properties	2531
MSC Segment	2633
MSC operating results	2633
~~Nevada~~USA Segment	2935
Advanced-stage Properties – Gold Bar project	2935
Los Azules Segment	3036
Los Azules exploration property	3036
Timmins Segment	36
Timmins exploration property	36
Black Fox Complex	36
Non-GAAP Financial Performance Measures	3037
Contingencies	3541
Critical Accounting Policies	3541
Forward Looking Statements	3541
Risk Factors Impacting Forward-Looking Statements	3642


									Total
									Segment
Three months ended March 31, 2017	Mexico		MSC		Los Azules		Nevada		Income (loss)
Gold and silver sales	$	14,833	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	14,833
Production costs applicable to sales		(6,984)		—		—		—		(6,984)
Mine development costs		(155)		—		—		(960)		(1,115)
Exploration costs		(1,539)		—		(6,301)		(484)		(8,324)
Property holding costs		(982)		—		(1)		(205)		(1,188)
General and administrative expenses		(839)		—		(208)		(426)		(1,473)
Income from investment in Minera Santa Cruz S.A. (net of amortization)		—		190		—		—		190
Segment income (loss)	$	4,334	$	190	$	(6,510)	$	(2,075)	$	(4,061)
Corporate and other
Other exploration										(120)
General and administrative expenses										(2,820)
Depreciation										(327)
Revision of estimates and accretion of reclamation obligations										(105)
Interest and other expense										(68)
Gain on sale of assets										11
Unrealized gain on derivatives										1,791
Foreign currency gain										25
Net loss before income taxes									$	(5,674)


	For the Three months ended
	March 31,
	2017		2016
	(in thousands)
Minera Santa Cruz S.A. (100% basis)
Net sales	$	48,343	$	52,072
Production costs applicable to sales		(36,699)		(37,727)
Net income		4,381		8,248
Portion attributable to McEwen Mining Inc. (49% basis)
Net income	$	2,147	$	4,042
Amortization of fair value increments		(2,069)		(3,682)
Income tax recovery		112		4,603
Income from investment in MSC, net of amortization	$	190	$	4,963