UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

☒QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, ~~2018~~2019

☐TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number 001-33393

GENCO SHIPPING & TRADING LIMITED

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Republic of the Marshall Islands		98-043-9758
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

299 Park Avenue, 12th Floor, New York, New York 10171

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

(646) 443-8550

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer ☐

Accelerated filer ☒

Non-accelerated filer ☐

Smaller reporting company ☐☒

Emerging growth company ☐

If emerging growth company, indicate by checkmark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Sections 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court. Yes ☒ No ☐

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:


Title of each class	Trading Symbol(s)	Name of exchange on which registered
Common stock, par value $0.01 per share	GNK	New York Stock Exchange (NYSE)

The number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of November 7, ~~2018:~~2019: Common stock, par value $0.01 per share — ~~41,644,470~~41,754,413 shares.

Table of Contents

Genco Shipping & Trading Limited

			Page

	PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.	Financial Statements (unaudited)		4

	a)	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, ~~2018~~2019 and December 31, ~~2017~~2018	4

	b)	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three and Nine Months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018 ~~and 2017~~	5

	c)	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive (Loss)Income ~~(Loss)~~ for the Three and Nine Months ended September 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017~~2018	6

	d)	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Equity for the Three and Nine Months ended September 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017~~2018	7

	e)	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine Months ended September 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017~~2018	8

	f)	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	9

Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		3836

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		6763

Item 4.	Controls and Procedures		6764

	PART II —OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1A.	Risk Factors		6865

Item 5.	Other information		65

Item 6.	Exhibits		6866

Table of Contents

Website Information

We intend to use our website, www.GencoShipping.com, as a means of disclosing material non-public information and for complying with our disclosure obligations under Regulation FD. Such disclosures will be included in our website’s Investor section. Accordingly, investors should monitor the Investor portion of our website, in addition to following our press releases, SEC filings, public conference calls, and webcasts. To subscribe to our e-mail alert service, please submit your e-mail address at the Investor Relations Home page of the Investor section of our website. The information contained in, or that may be accessed through, our website is not incorporated by reference into or a part of this document or any other report or document we file with or furnish to the SEC, and any references to our website are intended to be inactive textual references only.

Table of Contents

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Genco Shipping & Trading Limited

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, ~~2018~~2019 and December 31, ~~2017~~2018

(U.S. Dollars in thousands, except for share and per share data)

(Unaudited)


	September 30,		December 31,		September 30,		December 31,
	2018		2017		2019		2018

Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	165,724	$	174,479	$	165,876	$	197,499
Restricted cash		—		7,234		—		4,947
Due from charterers, net of a reserve of $515 and $246, respectively		18,536		12,855
Due from charterers, net of a reserve of $1,257 and $669, respectively						20,391		22,306
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		10,072		7,338		9,996		10,449
Inventories		29,980		15,333		22,982		29,548
Vessels held for sale		12,996		—		21,819		5,702
Total current assets		237,308		217,239		241,064		270,451

Noncurrent assets:
Vessels, net of accumulated depreciation of $229,559 and $213,431, respectively		1,382,428		1,265,577
Deferred drydock, net of accumulated amortization of $12,366 and $9,540 respectively		10,728		13,382
Fixed assets, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization of $1,177 and $1,003, respectively		1,495		1,014
Other noncurrent assets		—		514
Vessels, net of accumulated depreciation of $272,074 and $244,529, respectively						1,290,741		1,344,870
Deferred drydock, net of accumulated amortization of $11,860 and $13,553 respectively						16,039		9,544
Fixed assets, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization of $1,789 and $1,281, respectively						5,229		2,290
Operating lease right-of-use assets						8,576		—
Restricted cash		315		23,233		315		315
Total noncurrent assets		1,394,966		1,303,720		1,320,900		1,357,019

Total assets	$	1,632,274	$	1,520,959	$	1,561,964	$	1,627,470

Liabilities and Equity
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	33,084	$	23,230	$	41,145	$	29,143
Current portion of long-term debt		66,320		24,497		70,111		66,320
Deferred revenue		10,231		4,722		6,325		6,404
Current operating lease liabilities						1,655		—
Total current liabilities:		109,635		52,449		119,236		101,867

Noncurrent liabilities:
Long-term lease obligations		3,576		2,588
Long-term debt, net of deferred financing costs of $17,200 and $9,032, respectively		484,480		490,895
Long-term operating lease liabilities						10,253		—
Deferred rent						—		3,468
Long-term debt, net of deferred financing costs of $14,054 and $16,272, respectively						434,440		468,828
Total noncurrent liabilities		488,056		493,483		444,693		472,296

Total liabilities		597,691		545,932		563,929		574,163

Commitments and contingencies
Commitments and contingencies (Note 14)

Equity:
Common stock, par value $0.01; 500,000,000 shares authorized; 41,547,004 and 34,532,004 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively		415		345
Common stock, par value $0.01; 500,000,000 shares authorized; 41,656,947 and 41,644,470 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively						416		416
Additional paid-in capital		1,739,724		1,628,355		1,741,759		1,740,163
Retained deficit		(705,556)		(653,673)		(744,140)		(687,272)
Total equity		1,034,583		975,027		998,035		1,053,307
Total liabilities and equity	$	1,632,274	$	1,520,959	$	1,561,964	$	1,627,470

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

Genco Shipping & Trading Limited

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017~~2018

(U.S. Dollars in Thousands, Except for Earnings Per Share and Share Data)

(Unaudited)


	For the Three Months Ended				For the Nine Months Ended				For the Three Months Ended				For the Nine Months Ended
	September 30,				September 30,				September 30,				September 30,
	2018		2017		2018		2017		2019		2018		2019		2018
Revenues:
Voyage revenues	$	92,263	$	51,161	$	255,336	$	134,780	$	103,776	$	92,263	$	280,790	$	255,336

Total revenues		92,263		51,161		255,336		134,780		103,776		92,263		280,790		255,336

Operating expenses:
Voyage expenses		31,475		5,550		78,551		9,743		42,967		31,475		127,789		78,551
Vessel operating expenses		25,155		25,131		72,642		73,867		24,711		25,155		72,260		72,642
Charter hire expenses		723		—		1,231		—		5,475		723		12,743		1,231
General and administrative expenses (inclusive of nonvested stock amortization expense of $644, $1,255, $1,776 and $3,536, respectively)		5,033		5,889		16,761		16,550
General and administrative expenses (inclusive of nonvested stock amortization expense of $575, $644, $1,596 and $1,776, respectively)										6,144		5,033		18,253		16,761
Technical management fees		2,028		1,883		5,926		5,735		1,885		2,028		5,710		5,926
Depreciation and amortization		17,269		17,836		50,605		54,194		18,184		17,269		54,532		50,605
Impairment of vessel assets		—		18,654		56,586		21,993		12,182		—		26,078		56,586
Gain on sale of vessels		(1,509)		—		(1,509)		(7,712)		—		(1,509)		(611)		(1,509)

Total operating expenses		80,174		74,943		280,793		174,370		111,548		80,174		316,754		280,793

Operating income (loss)		12,089		(23,782)		(25,457)		(39,590)
Operating (loss) income										(7,772)		12,089		(35,964)		(25,457)

Other (expense) income:
Other income (expense)		213		(37)		272		(152)
Other income										86		213		523		272
Interest income		1,062		494		2,743		1,006		892		1,062		3,292		2,743
Interest expense		(7,656)		(7,857)		(24,249)		(22,559)		(7,797)		(7,656)		(24,496)		(24,249)
Impairment of right-of-use asset										—		—		(223)		—
Loss on debt extinguishment		—		—		(4,533)		—		—		—		—		(4,533)

Other expense		(6,381)		(7,400)		(25,767)		(21,705)		(6,819)		(6,381)		(20,904)		(25,767)

Income (loss) before income taxes		5,708		(31,182)		(51,224)		(61,295)
Income tax expense		—		—		—		—
Net (loss) income									$	(14,591)	$	5,708	$	(56,868)	$	(51,224)

Net income (loss)	$	5,708	$	(31,182)	$	(51,224)	$	(61,295)

Net earnings (loss) per share-basic	$	0.14	$	(0.90)	$	(1.37)	$	(1.80)
Net earnings (loss) per share-diluted	$	0.14	$	(0.90)	$	(1.37)	$	(1.80)
Net (loss) earnings per share-basic									$	(0.35)	$	0.14	$	(1.36)	$	(1.37)
Net (loss) earnings per share-diluted									$	(0.35)	$	0.14	$	(1.36)	$	(1.37)
Weighted average common shares outstanding-basic		41,618,187		34,469,998		37,263,200		34,135,736		41,749,200		41,618,187		41,739,287		37,263,200
Weighted average common shares outstanding-diluted		41,821,008		34,469,998		37,263,200		34,135,736		41,749,200		41,821,008		41,739,287		37,263,200

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

Genco Shipping & Trading Limited

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive (Loss) Income ~~(Loss)~~

For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017~~2018

(U.S. Dollars in Thousands)

(Unaudited)

For the Three Months Ended

For the Nine Months Ended

September 30,

September 30,


2018

2017

2018

2017

Net income (loss)

$
5,708

$
(31,182)

$
(51,224)

$
(61,295)

Other comprehensive income

—

—

—

—

Comprehensive income (loss)

$
5,708

$
(31,182)

$
(51,224)

$
(61,295)


	For the Three Months Ended				For the Nine Months Ended
	September 30,				September 30,
	2019		2018		2019		2018

Net (loss) income	$	(14,591)	$	5,708	$	(56,868)	$	(51,224)

Other comprehensive income		—		—		—		—

Comprehensive (loss) income	$	(14,591)	$	5,708	$	(56,868)	$	(51,224)

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

Genco Shipping & Trading Limited

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Equity

For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017~~2018

(U.S. Dollars in Thousands)

(Unaudited)

Series A

Additional

Preferred

Common

Paid-in

Retained

Stock

Stock

Capital

Deficit

Total Equity

Balance — January 1, 2018

$
—

$
345

$
1,628,355

$
(654,332)

$
974,368

Net loss

(51,224)

(51,224)

Issuance of 7,015,000 shares of common stock

70

109,593

109,663

Nonvested stock amortization

1,776

1,776

Balance — September 30, 2018

$
—

$
415

$
1,739,724

$
(705,556)

$
1,034,583


			Additional
	Common		Paid-in		Retained
	Stock		Capital		Deficit		Total Equity
Balance — January 1, 2019	$	416	$	1,740,163	$	(687,272)	$	1,053,307

Net loss						(7,801)		(7,801)

Issuance of 12,477 shares of vested RSUs		—		—				—

Nonvested stock amortization				452				452

Balance — March 31, 2019	$	416	$	1,740,615	$	(695,073)	$	1,045,958

Net loss						(34,476)		(34,476)

Nonvested stock amortization				569				569

Balance — June 30, 2019	$	416	$	1,741,184	$	(729,549)	$	1,012,051

Net loss						(14,591)		(14,591)

Nonvested stock amortization				575				575

Balance — September 30, 2019	$	416	$	1,741,759	$	(744,140)	$	998,035

Series A

Additional

Preferred

Common

Paid-in

Retained

Stock

Stock

Capital

Deficit

Total Equity

Balance — January 1, 2017

$
120,789

$
74

$
1,503,784

$
(594,948)

$
1,029,699

Net loss

(61,295)

(61,295)

Conversion of 27,061,856 shares of Series A Preferred Stock

(120,789)

270

120,519

—

Issuance of 18,234 shares of vested RSUs

—

—

—

Nonvested stock amortization

3,536

3,536

Balance — September 30, 2017

$
—

$
344

$
1,627,839

$
(656,243)

$
971,940


			Additional
	Common		Paid-in		Retained
	Stock		Capital		Deficit		Total Equity
Balance — January 1, 2018	$	345	$	1,628,355	$	(654,332)	$	974,368

Net loss						(55,813)		(55,813)

Nonvested stock amortization				493				493

Balance — March 31, 2018	$	345	$	1,628,848	$	(710,145)	$	919,048

Net loss						(1,118)		(1,118)

Issuance of 7,015,000 shares of common stock		70		109,605				109,675

Nonvested stock amortization				638				638

Balance — June 30, 2018	$	415	$	1,739,091	$	(711,263)	$	1,028,243

Net income						5,707		5,707

Issuance of 7,015,000 shares of common stock				(12)				(12)

Nonvested stock amortization				645				645

Balance — September 30, 2018	$	415	$	1,739,724	$	(705,556)	$	1,034,583

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

Genco Shipping & Trading Limited

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended September 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017~~2018

(U.S. Dollars in Thousands)

(Unaudited)


	For the Nine Months Ended				For the Nine Months Ended
	September 30,				September 30,
	2018		2017		2019		2018
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss	$	(51,224)	$	(61,295)	$	(56,868)	$	(51,224)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		50,605		54,194		54,532		50,605
Amortization of deferred financing costs		2,110		1,739		2,828		2,110
PIK interest, net		—		4,575
Payment of PIK interest		(5,341)		—		—		(5,341)
Noncash operating lease expense						911		—
Amortization of nonvested stock compensation expense		1,776		3,536		1,596		1,776
Impairment of right-of-use asset						223		—
Impairment of vessel assets		56,586		21,993		26,078		56,586
Gain on sale of vessels		(1,509)		(7,712)		(611)		(1,509)
Loss on debt extinguishment		4,533		—		—		4,533
Insurance proceeds for protection and indemnity claims		268		478		413		268
Insurance proceeds for loss of hire claims		58		1,781		—		58
Change in assets and liabilities:
Increase in due from charterers		(6,329)		(495)
Decrease (increase) in due from charterers						1,915		(6,329)
Increase in prepaid expenses and other current assets		(5,966)		(8,001)		(655)		(5,966)
Increase in inventories		(14,647)		(1,837)
Decrease (increase) in inventories						6,566		(14,647)
Decrease in other noncurrent assets		514		—		—		514
Increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses		8,169		766		5,061		8,169
Increase in deferred revenue		5,017		1,144
Increase in lease obligations		988		540
(Decrease) increase in deferred revenue						(79)		5,017
Decrease in operating lease liabilities						(1,187)		—
Increase in deferred rent						—		988
Deferred drydock costs incurred		(2,233)		(7,685)		(11,965)		(2,233)
Net cash provided by operating activities		43,375		3,721		28,758		43,375
						��
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchase of vessels, including deposits		(239,695)		(252)		(10,392)		(239,695)
Purchase of scrubbers (capitalized in Vessels)						(24,736)		—
Purchase of other fixed assets		(888)		(198)		(3,590)		(888)
Net proceeds from sale of vessels		10,626		15,513		6,309		10,626
Insurance proceeds for hull and machinery claims		3,466		718		612		3,466
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities		(226,491)		15,781
Net cash used in investing activities						(31,797)		(226,491)

Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from the $108 Million Credit Facility		108,000		—		—		108,000
Proceeds from the $460 Million Credit Facility		460,000		—
Repayments on the $108 Million Credit Facility						(4,740)		—
Proceeds from $495 Million Credit Facility						21,500		460,000
Repayments on the $495 Million Credit Facility						(49,575)		—
Repayments on the $400 Million Credit Facility		(399,600)		(300)		—		(399,600)
Repayments on the $98 Million Credit Facility		(93,939)		—		—		(93,939)
Repayments on the 2014 Term Loan Facilities		(25,544)		(2,062)		—		(25,544)
Payment of debt extinguishment costs		(2,962)		—		—		(2,962)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock		110,249		—		—		110,249
Payment of common stock issuance costs		(496)		—		(105)		(496)
Payment of Series A Preferred Stock issuance costs		—		(1,103)
Payment of deferred financing costs		(11,499)		—		(611)		(11,499)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		144,209		(3,465)
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities						(33,531)		144,209

Net (decrease) increase in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash		(38,907)		16,037
Net decrease in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash						(36,570)		(38,907)

Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of period		204,946		169,068		202,761		204,946
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of period	$	166,039	$	185,105	$	166,191	$	166,039

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

Genco Shipping & Trading Limited

(U.S. Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share and Share Data)

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

1 - GENERAL INFORMATION

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Genco Shipping & Trading Limited (“GS&T”) and its direct and indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”). The Company is engaged in the ocean transportation of drybulk cargoes worldwide through the ownership and operation of drybulk carrier vessels. GS&T is incorporated under the laws of the Marshall Islands, and as of September 30, ~~2018,~~2019, is the direct or indirect owner of all of the outstanding shares or limited liability company interests of the following subsidiaries: Genco Ship Management LLC; Genco Investments LLC; Genco RE Investments LLC; Genco Shipping Pte. Ltd.; Genco Shipping A/S; Baltic Trading Limited (“Baltic Trading”); and the ship-owning subsidiaries as set forth below under “Other General Information.”

On June 19, 2018, the Company closed an equity offering of 7,015,000 shares of common stock at an offering price of $16.50 per share. The Company received net proceeds of ~~$109,663~~$109,648 after deducting underwriters’ discounts and commissions and other expenses.

On November 15, 2016, the Company entered into stock purchase agreements (the “Purchase Agreements”) effective as of October 4, 2016 with funds or related entities managed by Centerbridge Partners, L.P. or its affiliates (“Centerbridge”), Strategic Value Partners, LLC (“SVP”) and Apollo Global Management, LLC (“Apollo”). Pursuant to the Purchase Agreements, the Company completed the private placement of 27,061,856 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock (“Series A Preferred Stock”) which included 25,773,196 shares at a price per share of $4.85 and an additional 1,288,660 shares issued as a commitment fee on a pro rata basis. The Company received net proceeds of $120,789 after deducting placement agents’ fees and expenses. On January 4, 2017, the Company’s shareholders approved at a Special Meeting of Shareholders the issuance of up to 27,061,856 shares of common stock of the Company upon the conversion of shares of the Series A Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share, which were purchased by certain investors in a private placement (the “Conversion Proposal”). As a result of shareholder approval of the Conversion Proposal, all outstanding 27,061,856 shares of Series A Preferred Stock were automatically and mandatorily converted into 27,061,856 shares of common stock of the Company on January 4, 2017.

Other General Information

Below is the list of the Company’s wholly owned ship-owning subsidiaries as of September 30, ~~2018:~~2019:


Wholly Owned Subsidiaries	Vessel Acquired	Dwt	Delivery Date		Year Built	Vessel Acquired	Dwt	Delivery Date		Year Built

Genco Vigour Limited	Genco Vigour	73,941	12/15/04		1999
Genco Explorer Limited	Genco Explorer	29,952	12/17/04		1999
Genco Beauty Limited	Genco Beauty	73,941	2/7/05		1999
Genco Knight Limited	Genco Knight	73,941	2/16/05		1999
Genco Muse Limited	Genco Muse	48,913	10/14/05		2001
Genco Augustus Limited	Genco Augustus	180,151	8/17/07		2007	Genco Augustus	180,151	8/17/07		2007
Genco Tiberius Limited	Genco Tiberius	175,874	8/28/07		2007	Genco Tiberius	175,874	8/28/07		2007
Genco London Limited	Genco London	177,833	9/28/07		2007	Genco London	177,833	9/28/07		2007
Genco Titus Limited	Genco Titus	177,729	11/15/07		2007	Genco Titus	177,729	11/15/07		2007
Genco Challenger Limited	Genco Challenger	28,428	12/14/07		2003	Genco Challenger	28,428	12/14/07	(3)	2003
Genco Charger Limited	Genco Charger	28,398	12/14/07		2005	Genco Charger	28,398	12/14/07		2005
Genco Warrior Limited	Genco Warrior	55,435	12/17/07		2005	Genco Warrior	55,435	12/17/07		2005
Genco Predator Limited	Genco Predator	55,407	12/20/07		2005	Genco Predator	55,407	12/20/07		2005
Genco Hunter Limited	Genco Hunter	58,729	12/20/07		2007	Genco Hunter	58,729	12/20/07		2007
Genco Champion Limited	Genco Champion	28,445	1/2/08		2006	Genco Champion	28,445	1/2/08	(4)	2006
Genco Constantine Limited	Genco Constantine	180,183	2/21/08		2008	Genco Constantine	180,183	2/21/08		2008
Genco Raptor LLC	Genco Raptor	76,499	6/23/08		2007	Genco Raptor	76,499	6/23/08		2007
Genco Cavalier LLC	Genco Cavalier	53,617	7/17/08	(3)	2007
Genco Thunder LLC	Genco Thunder	76,588	9/25/08		2007	Genco Thunder	76,588	9/25/08		2007
Genco Hadrian Limited	Genco Hadrian	169,025	12/29/08		2008	Genco Hadrian	169,025	12/29/08		2008
Genco Commodus Limited	Genco Commodus	169,098	7/22/09		2009	Genco Commodus	169,098	7/22/09		2009
Genco Maximus Limited	Genco Maximus	169,025	9/18/09		2009	Genco Maximus	169,025	9/18/09		2009
Genco Claudius Limited	Genco Claudius	169,001	12/30/09		2010	Genco Claudius	169,001	12/30/09		2010
Genco Bay Limited						Genco Bay	34,296	8/24/10		2010
Genco Ocean Limited						Genco Ocean	34,409	7/26/10		2010
Genco Avra Limited						Genco Avra	34,391	5/12/11		2011
Genco Mare Limited						Genco Mare	34,428	7/20/11		2011
Genco Spirit Limited						Genco Spirit	34,432	11/10/11		2011
Genco Aquitaine Limited						Genco Aquitaine	57,981	8/18/10		2009
Genco Ardennes Limited						Genco Ardennes	58,018	8/31/10		2009
Genco Auvergne Limited						Genco Auvergne	58,020	8/16/10		2009
Genco Bourgogne Limited						Genco Bourgogne	58,018	8/24/10		2010
Genco Brittany Limited						Genco Brittany	58,018	9/23/10		2010
Genco Languedoc Limited						Genco Languedoc	58,018	9/29/10		2010
Genco Loire Limited						Genco Loire	53,430	8/4/10		2009
Genco Lorraine Limited						Genco Lorraine	53,417	7/29/10		2009
Genco Normandy Limited						Genco Normandy	53,596	8/10/10		2007
Genco Picardy Limited						Genco Picardy	55,257	8/16/10		2005
Genco Provence Limited						Genco Provence	55,317	8/23/10		2004
Genco Pyrenees Limited						Genco Pyrenees	58,018	8/10/10		2010
Genco Rhone Limited						Genco Rhone	58,018	3/29/11		2011
Genco Weatherly Limited						Genco Weatherly	61,556	7/26/18		2014
Genco Columbia Limited						Genco Columbia	60,294	9/10/18		2016
Genco Endeavour Limited						Genco Endeavour	181,060	8/15/18		2015
Genco Resolute Limited						Genco Resolute	181,060	8/14/18		2015
Genco Defender Limited						Genco Defender	180,021	9/6/18		2016

Table of Contents

Wholly Owned Subsidiaries

Vessel Acquired

Dwt

Delivery Date

Year Built

Genco Bay Limited

Genco Bay

34,296

8/24/10

2010

Genco Ocean Limited

Genco Ocean

34,409

7/26/10

2010

Genco Avra Limited

Genco Avra

34,391

5/12/11

2011

Genco Mare Limited

Genco Mare

34,428

7/20/11

2011

Genco Spirit Limited

Genco Spirit

34,432

11/10/11

2011

Genco Aquitaine Limited

Genco Aquitaine

57,981

8/18/10

2009

Genco Ardennes Limited

Genco Ardennes

58,018

8/31/10

2009

Genco Auvergne Limited

Genco Auvergne

58,020

8/16/10

2009

Genco Bourgogne Limited

Genco Bourgogne

58,018

8/24/10

2010

Genco Brittany Limited

Genco Brittany

58,018

9/23/10

2010

Genco Languedoc Limited

Genco Languedoc

58,018

9/29/10

2010

Genco Loire Limited

Genco Loire

53,430

8/4/10

2009

Genco Lorraine Limited

Genco Lorraine

53,417

7/29/10

2009

Genco Normandy Limited

Genco Normandy

53,596

8/10/10

2007

Genco Picardy Limited

Genco Picardy

55,257

8/16/10

2005

Genco Provence Limited

Genco Provence

55,317

8/23/10

2004

Genco Pyrenees Limited

Genco Pyrenees

58,018

8/10/10

2010

Genco Rhone Limited

Genco Rhone

58,018

3/29/11

2011

Genco Weatherly Limited

Genco Weatherly

61,556

7/26/18

2014

Genco Columbia Limited

Genco Columbia

60,294

9/10/18

2016

Genco Endeavour Limited

Genco Endeavour

181,060

8/15/18

2015

Genco Resolute Limited

Genco Resolute

181,060

8/14/18

2015

Genco Defender Limited

Genco Defender

180,021

9/6/18

2016

Genco Liberty Limited

Genco Liberty

180,032

9/11/18

2016

Baltic Lion Limited

Baltic Lion

179,185

4/8/15
(1)
2012

Baltic Tiger Limited

Genco Tiger

179,185

4/8/15
(1)
2011

Baltic Leopard Limited

Baltic Leopard

53,446

4/8/10
(2)
2009

Baltic Panther Limited

Baltic Panther

53,350

4/29/10
(2)
2009

Baltic Cougar Limited

Baltic Cougar

53,432

5/28/10
(2)
2009

Baltic Jaguar Limited

Baltic Jaguar

53,473

5/14/10
(2)
2009

Baltic Bear Limited

Baltic Bear

177,717

5/14/10
(2)
2010

Baltic Wolf Limited

Baltic Wolf

177,752

10/14/10
(2)
2010

Baltic Wind Limited

Baltic Wind

34,408

8/4/10
(2)
2009

Baltic Cove Limited

Baltic Cove

34,403

8/23/10
(2)
2010

Baltic Breeze Limited

Baltic Breeze

34,386

10/12/10
(2)
2010

Baltic Fox Limited

Baltic Fox

31,883

9/6/13
(2)
2010

Baltic Hare Limited

Baltic Hare

31,887

9/5/13
(2)
2009

Baltic Hornet Limited

Baltic Hornet

63,574

10/29/14
(2)
2014

Baltic Wasp Limited

Baltic Wasp

63,389

1/2/15
(2)
2015

Baltic Scorpion Limited

Baltic Scorpion

63,462

8/6/15

2015

Baltic Mantis Limited

Baltic Mantis

63,470

10/9/15

2015


Wholly Owned Subsidiaries	Vessel Acquired	Dwt	Delivery Date		Year Built

Genco Liberty Limited	Genco Liberty	180,032	9/11/18		2016
Baltic Lion Limited	Baltic Lion	179,185	4/8/15	(1)	2012
Baltic Tiger Limited	Genco Tiger	179,185	4/8/15	(1)	2011
Baltic Leopard Limited	Baltic Leopard	53,446	4/8/10	(2)	2009
Baltic Panther Limited	Baltic Panther	53,350	4/29/10	(2)	2009
Baltic Cougar Limited	Baltic Cougar	53,432	5/28/10	(2)	2009
Baltic Jaguar Limited	Baltic Jaguar	53,473	5/14/10	(2)	2009
Baltic Bear Limited	Baltic Bear	177,717	5/14/10	(2)	2010
Baltic Wolf Limited	Baltic Wolf	177,752	10/14/10	(2)	2010
Baltic Wind Limited	Baltic Wind	34,408	8/4/10	(2)	2009
Baltic Cove Limited	Baltic Cove	34,403	8/23/10	(2)	2010
Baltic Breeze Limited	Baltic Breeze	34,386	10/12/10	(2)	2010
Baltic Fox Limited	Baltic Fox	31,883	9/6/13	(2)	2010
Baltic Hare Limited	Baltic Hare	31,887	9/5/13	(2)	2009
Baltic Hornet Limited	Baltic Hornet	63,574	10/29/14	(2)	2014
Baltic Wasp Limited	Baltic Wasp	63,389	1/2/15	(2)	2015
Baltic Scorpion Limited	Baltic Scorpion	63,462	8/6/15		2015
Baltic Mantis Limited	Baltic Mantis	63,470	10/9/15		2015

(1)

The delivery date for these vessels represents the date that the vessel was purchased from Baltic Trading.

(2)

The delivery date for these vessels represents the date that the vessel was delivered to Baltic Trading.

(3)

The Genco ~~Cavalier~~Challenger was sold on October ~~16, 2018.~~10, 2019. Refer to Note 1617 — Subsequent Events.

(4)

The Genco Champion was sold on October 21, 2019. Refer to Note 17 — Subsequent Events.

2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Principles of consolidation

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) which includes the accounts of GS&T and its direct and indirect wholly-owned ~~subsidiaries, including Baltic Trading.~~subsidiaries. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Basis of presentation

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP for interim financial information and the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). In the opinion of management of the Company, all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of financial position and operating results have been included in the statements. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP

~~Table of Contents~~

have been condensed or omitted. These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2017~~2018 (the ~~“2017~~“2018 10-K”). The results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2018~~2019 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results to be expected for the year ending December 31, ~~2018.~~2019.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Significant estimates include vessel valuations, the valuation of amounts due from charterers, performance claims, residual value of vessels, useful life of vessels and the fair value of derivative instruments, if any. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Segment reporting

The Company reports financial information and evaluates its operations by ~~charter~~voyage revenues and not by the length of ship employment for its customers, i.e., spot or time charters. Each of the Company’s vessels serve the same type of customer, have similar operations and maintenance requirements, operate in the same regulatory environment,

Table of Contents

and are subject to similar economic characteristics. Based on this, the Company has determined that it operates in one reportable segment, ~~which is engaged in~~ the ocean transportation of drybulk cargoes worldwide through the ownership and operation of drybulk carrier vessels.

Restricted cash

Current and non-current restricted cash includes cash that is restricted pursuant to our credit facilities. Refer to Note 7 — Debt. The following table provides a reconciliation of cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash reported within the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets that sum to the total of the same amounts shown in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows:


	September 30,		December 31,		September 30,		December 31,		September 30,		December 31,		September 30,		December 31,
	2018		2017		2017		2016		2019		2018		2018		2017
Cash and cash equivalents	$	165,724	$	174,479	$	152,511	$	133,400	$	165,876	$	197,499	$	165,724	$	174,479
Restricted cash - current		—		7,234		8,593		8,242		—		4,947		—		7,234
Restricted cash - noncurrent		315		23,233		24,001		27,426		315		315		315		23,233

Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash	$	166,039	$	204,946	$	185,105	$	169,068	$	166,191	$	202,761	$	166,039	$	204,946

~~Inventories~~

Inventories consists of consumable bunkers and lubricants, which are stated at the lower of cost and net realizable value, if required. During the three months ended March 31, 2018, the Company opted to break out these inventory assets that were previously classified as Prepaid expenses and other current assets into its own financial statement line item in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets to provide a greater level of detail in the face of the financial statements. Inventories have been increasing as the result of the employment of vessels on spot market voyage charters, which result in higher bunker inventories. This change was made retrospectively for comparability purposes, and there was no effect on the Total current assets as of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets and the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.

Vessels held for sale

On ~~June 27, 2018~~August 2, 2019, September 20, 2019 and ~~August 30, 2018,~~September 25, 2019 the Company ~~reached~~entered into agreements to sell the Genco ~~Explorer~~Challenger, the Genco Champion and the Genco ~~Cavalier,~~Thunder, respectively, and ~~these~~the relevant vessel assets have been classified as held for sale in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of September 30, 2019. Refer to Note 4 — Vessel Acquisitions and Dispositions for details of the agreement.

On November 23, 2018, the Company reached an agreement to sell the Genco Vigour, and the relevant vessel assets have been classified as held for sale in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2018. This vessel was sold on January 28, 2019. Refer to Note 4 — Vessel Acquisitions and Dispositions for ~~details of the agreements.~~further information.

~~Table of Contents~~

Vessels, net

Vessels, net is stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Included in vessel costs are acquisition costs directly attributable to the acquisition of a vessel and expenditures made to prepare the vessel for its initial ~~voyage.~~voyage, including the purchase of exhaust gas cleaning systems (“scrubbers”) and ballast water treatment systems. The Company also capitalizes interest costs for a vessel under construction as a cost ~~which~~that is directly attributable to the acquisition of a vessel. Vessels are depreciated on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives, determined to be 25 years from the date of initial delivery from the shipyard. Depreciation expense for vessels for the three months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018 was $16,649 and ~~2017 was~~ $16,013, ~~and $16,575,~~ respectively. Depreciation expense for vessels for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018 was $49,834 and ~~2017 was~~ $46,933, ~~and $50,173,~~ respectively.

Depreciation expense is calculated based on cost less the estimated residual scrap value. The costs of significant replacements, renewals and betterments are capitalized and depreciated over the shorter of the vessel’s remaining estimated useful life or the estimated life of the renewal or betterment. Undepreciated cost of any asset component being replaced that was acquired after the initial vessel purchase is written off as a component of vessel operating expense. Expenditures for routine maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred. Scrap value is estimated by the Company by taking the estimated scrap value of $310 per lightweight ton (“lwt”) times the weight of the ship noted in lwt.

Deferred revenue

Deferred revenue primarily relates to cash received from charterers prior to it being earned. These amounts are recognized as income when earned. Additionally, deferred revenue includes estimated customer claims, mainly due to

Table of Contents

time charter performance issues. As of September 30, ~~2018~~2019 and December 31, ~~2017,~~2018, the Company had an accrual of ~~$409~~$511 and ~~$327,~~$345, respectively, related to these estimated customer claims.

Revenue recognition

Since the Company’s inception, revenues have been generated from time charter agreements, spot market voyage charters, pool agreements and spot market-related time charters. A time charter involves placing a vessel at the charterer’s disposal for a set period of time during which the charterer may use the vessel in return for the payment by the charterer of a specified daily hire rate, including any ballast bonus payments received pursuant to the time charter agreement. Spot market-related time charters are the same as other time charter agreements, except the time charter rates are variable and are based on a percentage of the average daily rates as published by the Baltic Dry Index (“BDI”). Voyage revenues also include the sale of bunkers consumed during short-term time charters pursuant to the terms of the time charter agreement.

The Company records time charter revenues over the term of the charter as service is provided. Revenues are recognized on a straight-line basis as the average revenue over the term of the respective time charter agreement. The Company records spot market-related time charter revenues over the term of the charter as service is provided based on the rate determined based on the BDI for each billing period. As such, the revenue earned by the Company’s vessels that are on spot market-related time charters is subject to fluctuations of the spot market.

The Company has identified that time charter agreements, including fixed rate time charters and spot market-related time charters, contain a lease in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 842 — Leases, refer to Note 12 — Voyage Revenue for further discussion.

The Company recognizes revenue for spot market voyage charters ratably over the total transit time of each voyage, which commences at the time the vessel arrives at the loading port and ends at the time the discharge of cargo is completed at the discharge port, in accordance with ASC 606 — Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASC 606”). Refer to Note 12 — Voyage Revenue for further discussion.

At September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the Company did not have any of its vessels in vessel pools. Under pool arrangements, the vessels operate under a time charter agreement whereby the cost of bunkers and port expenses are borne by the pool and operating costs including crews, maintenance and insurance are typically paid by the owner of the vessel. Since the members of the pool share in the revenue less voyage expenses generated by the entire group of vessels in the pool, and the pool operates in the spot market, the revenue earned by these vessels is subject to the fluctuations of the spot market. The Company recognizes revenue from these pool arrangements based on its portion of the net distributions reported by the relevant pool, which represents the net voyage revenue of the pool after voyage expenses and pool manager fees.

~~Pursuant to the new revenue recognition guidance as disclosed in Note 12~~ — Voyage Revenue, which was adopted during the first quarter of 2018, revenue for spot market voyage charters is now recognized ratably over the total transit time of each voyage, which commences at the time the vessel arrives at the loading port and ends at the time the discharge of cargo is completed at the discharge port.

~~Table of Contents~~

Voyage expense recognition

In time charters, spot market-related time charters and pool agreements, operating costs including crews, maintenance and insurance are typically paid by the owner of the vessel and specified voyage costs such as fuel and port charges are paid by the charterer. These expenses are borne by the Company during spot market voyage charters. As such, there are significantly higher voyage expenses for spot market voyage charters as compared to time charters, spot market-related time charters and pool agreements. Refer to Note 12 — Voyage Revenue for further discussion of the accounting for fuel expenses for spot market voyage ~~charters as a result of the new revenue recognition guidance adopted during the first quarter of 2018.~~charters. There are certain other non-specified voyage expenses, such as commissions, which are typically borne by the Company. At the inception of a time charter, the Company records the difference between the cost of bunker fuel delivered by the terminating charterer and the bunker fuel sold to the new charterer as a gain or loss within voyage expenses. Additionally, the Company records lower of cost and net realizable value adjustments to re-value the bunker fuel on a quarterly basis ~~as required.~~for certain time charter agreements where the inventory is subject to gains and losses. These differences in bunkers, including any lower of cost and net realizable value adjustments, resulted in a net (loss) gain of ~~$1,020~~($497) and ~~$269~~$1,020 during the three months ended September 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017,~~2018, respectively, and ~~$2,909~~($734) and ~~$1,205~~$2,909 during the nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, ~~and 2017,~~ respectively.

Table of Contents

Additionally, voyage expenses include the cost of bunkers consumed during short-term time charters pursuant to the terms of the time charter agreement.

~~United States Gross Transportation Tax~~

The Company did not qualify for the Section 883 exemption for the year ended December 31, 2017 and believes that it will not qualify for the Section 883 exemption for the year ended December 31, 2018. In the absence of the exemption, 50% of the Company’s gross shipping income attributable to transportation beginning or ending in the U.S. (but not both beginning and ending in the U.S.) will be subject to a 4% tax without allowance for deductions (the “U.S. gross transportation tax”). The Company has recorded estimated U.S. gross transportation tax of $186 and $149 during the three months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively, and $566 and $246 during the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. U.S. gross transportation tax has been recorded in Voyage expenses in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operation.

Charter hire expenses

During the second quarter of 2018, the Company began chartering-in third-party vessels. The costs to charter-in these vessels, which primarily include the daily charter hire rate net of commissions or net freight revenue, are recorded as Charter hire expenses. The company recorded $5,475 and $723 of charter hire expenses during the three months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively, and $12,743 and $1,231 of charter hire expenses during the nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

Impairment of vessel assets

During the three months ended September 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017,~~2018, the Company recorded $0$12,182 and ~~$18,654,~~$0, respectively, related to the impairment of vessel assets in accordance with ~~Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”)~~ASC 360 — “Property, Plant and Equipment” (“ASC 360”). Additionally, during the nine months ended September 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017,~~2018, the Company recorded $26,078 and $56,586, ~~and $21,993,~~ respectively, related to the impairment of vessel assets in accordance with ASC 360.

On November 4, 2019, the Company entered into an agreement to sell the Genco Raptor, a 2007-built Panamax vessel, to a third party for $10,200 less a 2.0% commission payable to a third party. As the anticipated undiscounted cash flows, including the net sales price, did not exceed the net book value of the vessel as of September 30, 2019, the vessel value for the Genco Raptor was adjusted to its net sales price of $9,996 as of September 30, 2019. This resulted in an impairment loss of $5,812 during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019.

On September 25, 2019, the Company entered into an agreement to sell the Genco Thunder, a 2007-built Panamax vessel, for $10,400 less a 2.0% broker commission payable to a third party. Therefore, the vessel value for the Genco Thunder was adjusted to its net sales price of $10,192 as of September 30, 2019. This resulted in an impairment loss of $5,749 during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019.

On September 20, 2019, the Company entered into an agreement to sell the Genco Champion, a 2006-built Handysize vessel, for $6,600 less a 3.0% broker commission payable to a third party. Therefore, the vessel value for the Genco Champion was adjusted to its net sales price of $6,402 as of September 30, 2019. This resulted in an impairment loss of $621 during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019. Refer to Note 17 — Subsequent Events for further detail regarding the sale.

On August 2, 2019, the Company entered into an agreement to sell the Genco Challenger, a 2003-built Handysize vessel, for $5,250 less a 2.0% broker commission payable to a third party. As the anticipated undiscounted cash flows, including the net sales price, did not exceed the net book value of the vessel as of June 30, 2019, the vessel value for the Genco Challenger was adjusted to its net sales price of $5,145 as of June 30, 2019. This resulted in an impairment loss of $4,401 during the nine months ended September 30, 2019. Refer to Note 17 — Subsequent Events for further detail regarding the sale.

At June 30, 2019, the Company determined that the expected estimated future undiscounted cash flows for the Genco Champion, a 2006-built Handysize vessel, and the Genco Charger, a 2005-built Handysize vessel, did not exceed the net book value of these vessels as of June 30, 2019. As such, the Company adjusted the value of these vessels to their respective fair market values as of June 30, 2019. This resulted in an impairment loss of $9,496 during the nine months ended September 30, 2019.

On July 24, 2018, the Company entered into an agreement to sell the Genco Surprise, a 1998-built Panamax vessel, for $5,300 less a 3.0% broker commission payable to a third party. As the anticipated undiscounted cash flows, including the net sales price, did not exceed the net book value of the vessel as of June 30, 2018, the vessel value for the Genco Surprise was adjusted to its net sales price of $5,141 as of June 30, 2018. This resulted in an impairment loss of $184 during the nine months ended September 30, 2018. Refer to Note 4 — Vessel Acquisitions and Dispositions for further detail regarding the sale.

Table of Contents

On February 27, 2018, the Board of Directors determined to dispose of the Company’s following nine vessels: the Genco Cavalier, the Genco Loire, the Genco Lorraine, the Genco Muse, the Genco Normandy, the Baltic Cougar, the Baltic Jaguar, the Baltic Leopard and the Baltic Panther, at times and on terms to be determined in the future. Given this decision, and that the estimated future undiscounted cash flows for each of these older vessels did not exceed the net

~~Table of Contents~~

book value for each vessel, wethe Company adjusted the values of these older vessels to their respective fair market values during the three months ended March 31, 2018. This resulted in an impairment loss of $56,402 during the nine months ended September 30, 2018.

~~On August 4, 2017,~~Gain on sale of vessels

During the Board of Directors determined to dispose of the Company’s vessels built in 1999, namely the Genco Beauty, the Genco Explorer, the Genco Knight, the Genco Progress and the Genco Vigour, at times and on terms to be determined in the future. Given this decision, and that the estimated future undiscounted cash flows for each of these older vessels did not exceed the net book value for each vessel, we have adjusted the values of these older vessels to their respective fair market values during the three months ended September 30, 2017. This resulted in an impairment loss of $18,654 during the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2017.~~

~~At June 30, 2017,~~2019, the Company ~~determined that the sum~~recorded a net gain of ~~the estimated undiscounted future cash flows attributable~~$611 related to the ~~Genco Surprise did not exceed the carrying value~~sale of ~~the vessel at June 30, 2017 and reduced the carrying value~~vessels. The net gain of ~~the Genco Surprise, a 1998-built Panamax vessel, to its fair market value as of June 30, 2017. This resulted in an impairment loss of $3,339~~$611 recorded during the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017.~~

~~Gain on~~2019 related primarily to the sale of ~~vessels~~

the Genco Vigour. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018, the Company recorded a net gain of $1,509 related to the sale of vessels. The net gain of $1,509 recorded during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018 related primarily to the sale of the Genco Progress and Genco Surprise.

During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, the Company recorded a net gain of $0 and $7,712, respectively, related to the sale of vessels. The net gain of $7,712 recorded during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 related primarily to the sale of the Genco Wisdom, the Genco Reliance, the Genco Carrier, the Genco Success and the Genco Prosperity.

Loss on debt ~~extinguishment~~extinguishment

D~~uring~~During the ~~three and~~ nine months ended September 30, 2018, the Company recorded ~~$0 and~~ $4,533 ~~respectively,~~ related to the loss on the extinguishment of debt in accordance with ASC 470-50 — “Debt – Modifications and Extinguishments” (“ASC 470-50”). This loss was recognized as a result of the refinancing of the $400 Million Credit Facility, the $98 Million Credit Facility and the 2014 Term Loan Facilities with the $460 Million Credit Facility on June 5, 2018 as described in Note 7 — Debt.

Recent accounting pronouncements

In August 2018, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2018-13, “Disclosure Framework: Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement (“ASU 2018-03”),” which change the disclosure requirements for fair value measurements by removing, adding, and modifying certain disclosures. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, and for interim periods within that year. Early adoption is permitted for any eliminated or modified disclosures upon issuance of this ASU. The Company ~~is currently evaluating~~has evaluated the impact of ~~this adoption on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.~~

In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-09, “Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718), Scope of Modification Account” (“ASU 2017-09”). This ASU provides guidance on determining which changes to the terms and conditions of share-based payment awards require an entity to apply modification accounting. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and for interim periods within that year and early adoption is permitted. ASU 2017-09 must be applied prospectively to an award modified on or after the adoption ~~date. The Company adopted~~of ASU ~~2017-09 during the first quarter of 2018~~2018-03 and has determined that there ~~was~~is no effect on its consolidated financial statements.

In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-18, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash” (“ASU 2016-18”). This ASU adds or clarifies the guidance in ASC 230 – Statement of Cash Flows regarding the classification and presentation of restricted cash in the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-18 requires entities to show

~~Table of Contents~~

the changes in the total of cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents in the statement of cash flow. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and for interim periods within those years and early adoption is permitted. ASU 2016-18 must be adopted retrospectively. The Company early adopted ASU 2016-18 during the fourth quarter of 2017. The retrospective application of ASU 2016-18 resulted in restricted cash being reclassified as a component of cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2017.

~~In August~~ 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments” (“ASU 2016-15”). This ASU adds or clarifies the guidance in ASC 230 – Statement of Cash Flows regarding the classification of certain cash receipts and payments in the statement of cash flows. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and for interim periods within those years and early adoption is permitted. This ASU shall be applied retrospectively to all periods presented, but may be applied prospectively from the earliest date practicable if retrospective application would be impracticable. The Company adopted ASU 2016-15 during the first quarter of 2018. The retrospective application of ASU 2016-15 resulted in insurance proceeds for protection and indemnity claims and loss of hire claims to be separately disclosed in the cash flows from operating activities and resulted in insurance proceeds for hull and machinery claims to be separately disclosed in the cash flows from investing activities. These amounts were previously recorded in the cash flows from operating activities as the change in prepaid expenses and other current assets. Additionally, as part of ASU 2016-15, any cash payments for debt prepayment or debt extinguishment costs (including third-party costs, premiums paid and other fees paid to lenders) must be classified as cash outflows for financing activities. Lastly, for any debt instruments that contain interest payable in-kind, any cash payments attributable to the payment of in-kind interest will be classified as cash outflows for operating activities. There were no cash payments for in-kind interest during the nine months ended September 30, 2017. Refer to the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842)” (“ASC 842”),” which replaces the existing guidance in ASC 840 – ~~Leases.~~Leases (“ASC 840”). This ASU requires a dual approach for lessee accounting under which a lessee would account for leases as finance leases or operating leases. Both finance leases and operating leases will result in the lessee recognizing a right-of-use asset and a corresponding lease liability for leases with lease terms of more than twelve months. For finance leases, the lessee would recognize interest expense and amortization of the right-of-use asset and for operating leases, the lessee would recognize a straight-line total lease expense. Accounting by lessors will remain largely unchanged from current U.S. GAAP. The requirements of this standard include an increase in required disclosures. This ASU iswas effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and for interim periods within those fiscal years. Lessees and lessors ~~will be~~were required to apply the new standard at the beginning of the earliest period presented in the financial statements in which they first apply the new guidance, using a modified retrospective transition method. The requirements of this standard include a significant increase in required disclosures. ~~The~~ ~~Company is currently evaluating the impact of this adoption on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.~~

In ~~January~~ ~~2016,~~July 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. ~~2016-01, “Recognition~~2018-11, “Leases (Topic 842): Targeted Improvements” which provided clarifications and ~~Measurement~~improvements to ASC 842, including allowing entities to elect an additional transition method with which to adopt ASC 842. The approved transition method enables entities to apply the transition requirements at the effective date of ~~Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” (“ASU 2016-01”). This ASU requires that equity investments be measured~~ASC 842 (rather than at ~~fair value~~the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented as currently required) with ~~changes~~the effect of the initial application of ASC 842 recognized as a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings in ~~fair value recognized~~the period of adoption. As a result, an entity’s reporting for the comparative periods presented in ~~net income (loss). ASU 2016-01 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those years. The Company adopted ASU 2016-01 during~~ the ~~first quarter~~year of ~~2018 and there was no impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements as the Company currently does not have any equity investments.~~

~~In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers” (“ASU 2014-09” or “ASC 606”), which supersedes~~ nearly all existing revenue recognition guidance under U.S. GAAP. The core principle is that a company should recognize revenue when promised goods or services are transferred to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which an entity expectsadoption would continue to be ~~entitled for those goods or services.~~in accordance with ASC ~~606 defines a five-step process to achieve this core principle and, in doing so, more judgment and estimates may be required within~~840, Lease (Topic 840) (“ASC 840”), including the revenue recognition process than are required under existing U.S. GAAP. The standard is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods therein, and shall be applied either retrospectively to each period presented or as a cumulative effect adjustment asdisclosure requirements of ~~the date of adoption (the “modified retrospective transition method”).~~ASC 840. The Company adopted ASC ~~606 during the first quarter of 2018~~842 on January 1, 2019 using ~~the modified retrospective~~this transition ~~method applied to all contracts and determined that the only impact was to spot market voyage charter contracts that~~method.

1514

Table of Contents

~~were not completed as~~The new guidance provides a number of ~~January 1, 2018. Upon adoption,~~optional practical expedients in the transition. The Company has elected the package of practical expedients, which among other things, allows the carryforward of the historical lease classification. Further, upon implementation of the new guidance, the Company ~~recognized~~has elected the ~~cumulative effect of adopting this guidance as an adjustment~~practical expedients to ~~its opening balance of retained earnings as of January 1, 2018. Prior periods were~~combine lease and non-lease components, and to not ~~retrospectively adjusted. The~~recognize right-of-use assets and lease liabilities for short-term leases. Upon adoption of ASC ~~606 did not have~~842 on January 1, 2019, the Company recorded a ~~financial impact on~~right-of-use asset of $9,710 and an operating lease liability of $13,095 in the ~~recognition~~Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. Refer to Note 13 — Leases for further information regarding our operating lease agreement and the effect of the adoption of ASC 842 from a lessee perspective.

Pursuant to ASC 842, the Company has identified revenue ~~generated~~ from its time charter agreements ~~spot market-related time charters and pool agreements.~~as lease revenue. Refer to Note 12 — Voyage ~~Revenue~~revenue for ~~further discussion~~additional information regarding the adoption of ~~the financial impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.~~ASC 842 from a lessor perspective.

3 - CASH FLOW INFORMATION

For the nine months ended September 30, 2019, the Company had non-cash investing activities not included in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for items included in Accounts payable and accrued expenses consisting of $2,478 for the Purchase of vessels, including deposits, $7,420 for the Purchase of scrubbers and $427 for the Purchase of other fixed assets.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2018 the Company had non-cash investing activities not included in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for items included in Accounts payable and accrued expenses consisting of $1,000 for the Purchase of vessels, including deposits, $253 for the Net proceeds from sale of vessels and $34 for the Purchase of other fixed assets. For the nine months ended September 30, 2018, the Company had non-cash financing activities not included in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for items included in Accounts payable and accrued expenses consisting of $350 for the Payment of deferred financing fees and $90 for the Payment of common stock issuance costs.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2017, the Company had non-cash investing activities not included in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for items included in Accounts payable and accrued expenses consisting of $9 for the Purchase of vessels, including deposits, and $56 for the Purchase of other fixed assets.

During the nine months ended September 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017,~~2018, cash paid for interest was ~~$20,623~~$21,927 and ~~$17,837,~~$20,623, respectively, excluding the PIK interest paid as a result of the refinancing of the $400 Million Credit Facility. Refer to Note 7 — Debt.

During the nine months ended September 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017,~~2018, there was no cash paid for estimated income taxes.

On May 15, 2019, the Company issued 29,580 restricted stock units to certain members of the Board of Directors. The aggregate fair value of these restricted stock units was $255.

On March 4, 2019, the Company issued 106,079 restricted stock units and options to purchase 240,540 shares of the Company’s stock at an exercise price of $8.39 to certain individuals. The fair value of these restricted stock units and stock options were $890 and $904, respectively.

On May 15, 2018, the Company issued 14,268 restricted stock units to certain members of the Board of Directors. The aggregate fair value of these restricted stock units was $255.

On February 27, 2018, the Company issued 37,346 restricted stock units and options to purchase 122,608 shares of the Company’s stock at an exercise price of $13.69 to certain individuals. The fair value of these restricted stock units and stock options were $512 and $926, respectively.

~~On May 17, 2017, the Company issued 25,197 restricted stock units to certain members of the Board of Directors. The aggregate fair value of these restricted stock units was $255.~~

On March 23, 2017, the Company issued 292,398 restricted stock units and options to purchase 133,000 shares of the Company’s stock at an exercise price of $11.13 per share to John C. Wobensmith, Chief Executive Officer and President. The fair value of these restricted stock units and stock options were $3,254 and $853, respectively.

Refer to Note 1415 — Stock-Based Compensation for further information regarding the aforementioned grants.

The Company adopted ASU 2016-15 during the first quarter of 2018 as noted in Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies. The retrospective application of ASU 2016-15 resulted in insurance proceeds for protection and indemnity claims and loss of hire claims for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 to be separately disclosed in the cash flows from operating activities and resulted in insurance proceeds for hull and machinery claims to be separately disclosed in the cash flows from investing activities. These amounts were previously recorded in the cash flows from operating activities as the change in prepaid expense and other current assets. The cash flow information for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 has been updated to reflect the adoption of ASU 2016-15 as presented in the table below:

1615

Table of Contents

As Reported

As Adjusted

September 30,

September 30,

Effect of

2017

2017

Change

Cash Flow Data:

Net cash provided by operating activities (1)

$
4,439

$
3,721

$
718

Net cash provided by investing activities (1)

15,063

15,781

(718)

~~(1)~~

~~Insurance proceeds reclassified from operating activities to investing activities as a result of the Company’s adoption of ASU 2016-15 for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 was $718.~~

4 - VESSEL ACQUISITIONS AND DISPOSITIONS

Vessel Acquisitions

On June 6, 2018, the Company entered into an agreement for the en bloc purchase of four drybulk vessels, including two Capesize drybulk vessels and two Ultramax drybulk vessels for approximately $141,000. Each vessel was built with a fuel-saving “eco” engine. The Genco Resolute, a 2015-built Capesize vessel, was delivered on August 14, 2018 and the Genco Endeavour, a 2015-built Capesize vessel, was delivered on August 15, 2018. The Genco Weatherly, a 2014-built Ultramax vessel, was delivered on July 26, 2018 and the Genco Columbia, a 2016-built Ultramax vessel, was delivered on September 10, 2018. The Company utilized a combination of cash on hand and proceeds from the $108 Million Credit Facility to finance the purchase.

On July 12, 2018, the Company entered into agreements to purchase two 2016-built Capesize drybulk vessels for an aggregate purchase price of $98,000. The Genco Defender was delivered on September 6, 2018, and the Genco Liberty was delivered on September 11, 2018. The Company utilized a combination of cash on hand and proceeds from the $108 Million Credit Facility to finance the purchase.

Vessel Dispositions

On September 25, 2019, the Company entered into an agreement to sell the Genco Thunder, a 2007-built Panamax vessel, for $10,400 less a 2.0% broker commission payable to a third party. The sale is expected to be completed during the fourth quarter of 2019. The vessel assets have been classified as held for sale in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of September 30, 2019. The Genco Thunder serves as collateral under the $495 Million Credit Facility.

On September 20, 2019, the Company entered into an agreement to sell the Genco Champion, a 2006-built Handysize vessel, for $6,600 less a 3.0% broker commission payable to a third party. The sale was completed on October 21, 2019. The vessel assets have been classified as held for sale in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of September 30, 2019. The Genco Champion served as collateral under the $495 Million Credit Facility. Refer to Note 17 — Subsequent Events for further information.

On August 2, 2019, the Company entered into an agreement to sell the Genco Challenger, a 2003-built Handysize vessel, for $5,250 less a 2.0% broker commission payable to a third party. The sale was completed on October 10, 2019. The vessel assets have been classified as held for sale in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of September 30, 2019. The Genco Challenger served as collateral under the $495 Million Credit Facility. Refer to Note 17 — Subsequent Events for further information.

On November 23, 2018, the Company entered into an agreement to sell the Genco Vigour, a 1999-built Panamax vessel, to a third party for $6,550 less a 2.0% broker commission payable to a third party. The sale was completed on January 28, 2019. The vessel assets were classified as held for sale in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2018.

On November 21, 2018, the Company entered into an agreement to sell the Genco Knight, a 1999-built Panamax vessel, to a third party for $6,200 less a 3.0% broker commission payable to a third party. The sale was completed on December 26, 2018.

On November 15, 2018, the Company entered into an agreement to sell the Genco Beauty, a 1999-built Panamax vessel, to a third party for $6,560 less a 3.0% broker commission payable to a third party. The sale was completed on December 17, 2018.

On October 31, 2018, the Company entered into an agreement to sell the Genco Muse, a 2001-built Handymax vessel, to a third party for $6,660 less a 2.0% broker commission payable to a third party. The sale was completed on December 5, 2018.

Table of Contents

On August 30, 2018, the Company entered into an agreement to sell the Genco Cavalier, a 2007-built Supramax vessel, to a third party for $10,000 less a 2.5% broker commission payable to a third party. The sale was completed on October 16, 2018. The ~~vessel assets have been classified as held for sale in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of September 30, 2018. The~~ Genco Cavalier served as collateral under the ~~$460~~$495 Million Credit ~~Facility. Refer~~Facility; therefore, $4,947 of the net proceeds received from the sale remained classified as restricted cash for 180 days following the sale date which was reflected as current restricted cash in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2018. That amount could be used towards the financing of a replacement vessel or vessels meeting certain requirements and added as collateral under the facility. If such a replacement vessel was not added as collateral within such 180 day period, the Company was required to use the proceeds as a loan prepayment. On April 15, 2019, the Company utilized these proceeds as a loan prepayment under the $495 Million Credit Facility, refer to Note 167 — ~~Subsequent Events for further information.~~ Debt.

On July 24, 2018, the Company entered into an agreement to sell the Genco Surprise, a 1998-built Panamax vessel, to a third party for $5,300 less a 3.0% broker commission payable to a third party. On August 7, 2018, the Company completed the sale of the Genco Surprise. ~~Refer to Note 2~~ — ~~Summary of Significant Accounting Policies regarding the impairment recorded for this vessel during the nine months ended September 30, 2018.~~

On June 27, 2018, the Company reached agreements to sell the Genco Explorer and the Genco Progress, both 1999-built Handysize vessels, to a third party for $5,600 each less a 3.0% broker commission payable to a third party. The sale of the Genco Progress was completed on September 13, 2018 and the sale of the Genco Explorer ~~is expected to be~~was completed ~~during~~on November 13, 2018.

With the ~~fourth quarter of 2018. The sale~~exception of the Genco ~~Explorer is subject to completion of definitive documentation and customary conditions. The vessel assets for~~Cavalier, the ~~Genco Explorer have been classified as held for sale in~~aforementioned six vessels that were sold during the ~~Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of September 30, 2018.~~

~~The Genco Surprise, the Genco Explorer~~year ended December 31, 2018 and the Genco ~~Progress~~Vigour which was sold during the nine months ended September 30, 2019 do not serve as collateral under any of the Company’s credit facilities; therefore the Company iswas not required to pay down any indebtedness with the proceeds from the sales.

~~Table of Contents~~

On December 19, 2016, the Board of Directors unanimously approved selling the Genco Prosperity, a 1997-built Handymax vessel, and on December 21, 2016, the Company reached an agreement to sell the Genco Prosperity to a third party for $3,050 less a 3.5% broker commission payable to a third party. ~~The sale was completed on May 16, 2017.~~

On December 5, 2016, the Board of Directors unanimously approved selling the Genco Success, a 1997-built Handymax vessel, and on December 15, 2016, the Company reached an agreement to sell the Genco Success to a third party for $2,800 less a 3.0% broker commission payable to a third party. The sale was completed on March 19, 2017.

During January 2017, the Board of Directors unanimously approved selling the Genco Carrier, a 1998-built Handymax vessel, and on January 25, 2017, the Company reached an agreement to sell the Genco Carrier to a third party for $3,560 less a $92 broker commission payable to a third party. The sale was completed on February 16, 2017.

During January 2017, the Board of Directors unanimously approved selling the Genco Reliance, a 1999-built Handysize vessel, and on January 12, 2017, the Company reached an agreement to sell the Genco Reliance to a third party for $3,500 less a 3.5% broker commission payable to a third party. The sale was completed on February 9, 2017.

On December 19, 2016, the Board of Directors unanimously approved selling the Genco Wisdom, a 1997-built Handymax vessel. On December 21, 2016, the Company reached an agreement to sell the Genco Wisdom to a third party for $3,250 less a 3.5% broker commission payable to a third party. The sale was completed on January 9, 2017.

Refer to Note 1 — General Information for a listing of the delivery dates for the vessels in the Company’s fleet.

5 - NET (LOSS) EARNINGS ~~(LOSS)~~ PER SHARE

The computation of basic net (loss) earnings ~~(loss)~~ per share is based on the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the reporting period. The computation of diluted net ~~loss~~(loss) earnings per share assumes the vesting of nonvested stock awards and the exercise of stock options (refer to Note 1415 — Stock-Based Compensation), for which the assumed proceeds upon vesting are deemed to be the amount of compensation cost attributable to future services and are not yet recognized using the treasury stock method, to the extent dilutive. There were 258,084 restricted stock units and 496,148 stock options excluded from the computation of diluted net loss per share during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019 because they were anti-dilutive. There were no anti-dilutive stock options, restricted stock or restricted stock units excluded from the computation of diluted net earnings per share during the three months ended September 30, 2018.There were 253,438 shares of restricted stock and restricted stock units and 255,608 stock options excluded from the computation of diluted net loss per share during the nine months ended September 30, 2018 because they were anti-dilutive. There were 331,200 shares of restricted stock and restricted stock units and 133,000 stock options excluded from the computation of diluted net loss per share during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017.anti-dilutive (refer to Note 1415 — Stock-Based Compensation).

The Company’s diluted net (loss) earnings ~~(loss)~~ per share will also reflect the assumed conversion of the equity warrants issued when the Company emerged from bankruptcy on July 9, 2014 (the “Effective Date”) and MIP Warrants issued by the Company (refer to Note 1415 — Stock-Based Compensation) if the impact is dilutive under the treasury stock method. The equity warrants have a 7-year term ~~which~~that commenced on the day following the Effective Date and are exercisable for one tenth of a share of the Company’s common stock. There were 0no unvested MIP Warrants and 3,936,761 of equity warrants excluded from the computation of diluted net (loss) earnings ~~(loss)~~ per share during the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017~~2018 because they were anti-dilutive.

1817

Table of Contents

The components of the denominator for the calculation of basic and diluted net ~~earning~~ (loss) earnings per share are as follows:


	For the Three Months Ended		For the Nine Months Ended		For the Three Months Ended		For the Nine Months Ended
	September 30,		September 30,		September 30,		September 30,
	2018	2017	2018	2017	2019	2018	2019	2018

Common shares outstanding, basic:
Weighted-average common shares outstanding, basic	41,618,187	34,469,998	37,263,200	34,135,736	41,749,200	41,618,187	41,739,287	37,263,200

Common shares outstanding, diluted:
Weighted-average common shares outstanding, basic	41,618,187	34,469,998	37,263,200	34,135,736	41,749,200	41,618,187	41,739,287	37,263,200

Dilutive effect of warrants	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—

Dilutive effect of stock options	31,965	—	—	—	—	31,965	—	—

Dilutive effect of restricted stock awards	170,856	—	—	—	—	170,856	—	—

Weighted-average common shares outstanding, diluted	41,821,008	34,469,998	37,263,200	34,135,736	41,749,200	41,821,008	41,739,287	37,263,200

6 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

During the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017,~~2018, the Company did not identify any related party transactions.

7 – DEBT

Long-term debt, net consists of the following:


	September 30,		December 31,		September 30,		December 31,
	2018		2017		2019		2018
Principal amount	$	568,000	$	519,083	$	518,605	$	551,420
PIK interest		—		5,341
Less: Unamortized debt financing costs		(17,200)		(9,032)		(14,054)		(16,272)
Less: Current portion		(66,320)		(24,497)		(70,111)		(66,320)

Long-term debt, net	$	484,480	$	490,895	$	434,440	$	468,828


	September 30, 2019				December 31, 2018
			Unamortized				Unamortized
			Debt Issuance				Debt Issuance
	Principal		Cost		Principal		Cost
$495 Million Credit Facility	$	416,925	$	12,501	$	445,000	$	14,423
$108 Million Credit Facility		101,680		1,553		106,420		1,849

Total debt	$	518,605	$	14,054	$	551,420	$	16,272

1918

Table of Contents

September 30, 2018

December 31, 2017

Unamortized

Unamortized

Debt Financing

Debt Financing

Principal

Cost

Principal

Cost

$460 Million Credit Facility

$
460,000

$
15,248

$
—

$
—

$108 Million Credit Facility

108,000

1,952

—

—

$400 Million Credit Facility

—

—

399,600

6,332

$98 Million Credit Facility

—

—

93,939

1,370

2014 Term Loan Facilities

—

—

25,544

1,330

PIK interest

—

—

5,341

—

Total debt

$
568,000

$
17,200

$
524,424

$
9,032

As of September 30, ~~2018~~2019 and December 31, ~~2017, $17,200~~2018, $14,054 and ~~$9,032~~$16,272 of deferred financing costs, respectively, were presented as a direct deduction within the outstanding debt balance in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet. Amortization expense for deferred financing costs was ~~$871~~$961 and ~~$586~~$871 for the three months ended September 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017,~~2018, respectively, and ~~$2,110~~$2,828 and ~~$1,739~~$2,110 for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017,~~2018, respectively. This amortization expense is recorded as a component of Interest expense in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Effective June 5, 2018, the portion of the unamortized deferred financing costs for the $400 Million Credit Facility and 2014 Term Loan Facilities that was identified as a debt modification, rather than an extinguishment of debt, is being amortized over the life of the ~~$460 Million Credit Facility in accordance with ASC 470-50.~~

~~$108 Million Credit Facility~~

~~On August 14, 2018, the Company entered into a five-year senior secured credit facility (the “$108 Million Credit Facility”) with Cr~~édit Agricole Corporate & Investment Bank (“CACIB”), as Structurer and Bookrunner, CACIB and Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken AB (Publ) as Mandate Lead Arrangers, CACIB as Administrative Agent and as Security Agent, and the other lenders party thereto from time to time. The Company has used proceeds from the $108 Million Credit Facility to finance a portion of the purchase price for the six vessels, including four Capesize Vessels and two Ultramax vessels, which were delivered to the Company during the three months ended September 30, 2018 (refer to Note 4 — Vessel Acquisitions and Dispositions). These six vessels also serve as collateral under the $108 Million Credit Facility. The Company drew down a total of $108,000 during the three months ended September 30, 2018, which represents 45% of the appraised value of the six vessels.

As of September 30, 2018, there was no availability under the $108 Million Credit Facility. Total debt repayments of $0 were made during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018 under the $108 Million Credit Facility. As of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the total outstanding net debt balance was $106,048 and $0, respectively.

~~The $108 Million Credit Facility provides for the following key terms:~~

~~The final maturity date of the $108 Million Credit Facility is August 14, 2023.~~

~~Borrowings under the $108 Million Credit Facility bear interest at~~ ~~London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) plus 2.50% through September 30, 2019 and LIBOR plus a range of 2.25% to 2.75% thereafter, dependent upon the Company’s ratio of total net indebtedness to the last twelve months EBITDA.~~

Scheduled amortization payments under the $108 Million Credit Facility reflect a repayment profile whereby the facility shall have been repaid to nil when the average vessel aged of the collateral vessels reaches 20 years. Based on this, the required repayments are $1,580 per quarter commencing on December 31, 2018, with a final balloon payment on the maturity date.

~~Table of Contents~~

~~Mandatory prepayments are to be applied to remaining amortization payments pro rata, while voluntary prepayments are to be applied to remaining amortization payments in order of maturity.~~

Dividends may be paid subject to customary conditions and a limitation of 50% of consolidated net income for the quarter preceding such dividend payment if the collateral maintenance test ratio is 200% or less for such quarter.

~~Acquisitions and additional indebtedness are allowed subject to compliance with financial covenants (including a collateral maintenance test) and other customary conditions.~~

~~Key financial covenants are substantially similar to those under the Company’s $460 Million Credit Facility and include:~~

~~minimum liquidity, with unrestricted cash and cash equivalents to equal or exceed the greater of $30,000 and 7.5% of total indebtedness;~~

minimum working capital, with consolidated current assets (excluding restricted cash) minus consolidated current liabilities (excluding the current portion of long-term indebtedness) to be not less than zero;

~~debt to capitalization, with the ratio of total indebtedness to total capitalization to be not more than 70%; and~~

~~collateral maintenance, with the aggregate appraised value of collateral vessels to be at least 135% of the principal amount of the loan outstanding under the $108 Million Credit Facility.~~

~~As of September 30, 2018, the Company believed it was in compliance with all of the financial covenants under the $108~~$495 Million Credit Facility.

$~~460~~495 Million Credit Facility

On May 31, 2018, the Company entered into a five-year senior secured credit facility for an aggregate amount of up to $460,000 ~~(the “$460 Million Credit Facility”)~~ with Nordea Bank AB (publ), New York Branch (“Nordea”), as Administrative Agent and Security Agenty, the various lenders party thereto, and Nordea, Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken AB (publ), ABN AMRO Capital USA LLC, DVB Bank SE, Crédit Agricole Corporate & Investment Bank, and Danish Ship Finance A/S as Bookrunners and Mandated Lead Arrangers. Deutsche Bank AG Filiale Deutschlandgeschäft, and CTBC Bank Co. Ltd. are Co-Arrangers under ~~the $460 Million Credit Facility.~~this credit facility. On June 5, 2018, proceeds of $460,000 under ~~the $460 Million Credit Facility~~this facility were used, together with cash on hand, to refinance all of the Company’s existing credit facilities (the $400 Million Credit Facility, $98 Million Credit Facility and 2014 Term Loan ~~Facilities.~~Facilities, as defined below) into one facility, and pay down the debt on seven of the Company’s oldest vessels, which have been identified for sale.

On February 28, 2019, the Company entered into an Amendment and Restatement Agreement (the “Amendment”) for this credit facility (the “$495 Million Credit Facility”) with Nordea Bank AB (publ), New York Branch (“Nordea”), as Administrative Agent and Security Agent, the various lenders party thereto, and Nordea, Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken AB (publ), ABN AMRO Capital USA LLC, DVB Bank SE, Crédit Agricole Corporate & Investment Bank, and Danish Ship Finance A/S as Bookrunners and Mandated Lead Arrangers. The Amendment provides for an additional tranche up to $35,000 to finance a portion of the acquisitions, installations, and related costs for scrubbers for 17 of the Company’s Capesize vessels. On August 28, 2019 and September 23, 2019, the Company made total drawdowns of $9,300 and $12,200, respectively, under the $35 Million tranche of the $495 Million Credit Facility.

On April 15, 2019, the Company utilized $4,947 of the proceeds from the sale of the Genco Cavalier that was classified as restricted cash as of December 31, 2018 as a loan prepayment under the $495 Million Credit Facility. Under the terms of the $495 Million Credit Facility, the amount received from the proceeds of the sale of a collateralized vessel can be used towards the financing of a replacement vessel or vessels meeting certain requirements and added as collateral under the facility. However, since a replacement vessel was not added as collateral within the 180 day period stipulated in the $495 Million Credit Facility, the Company was required to utilize the proceeds as a loan prepayment.

On May 10, 2019 and July 5, 2019, the Company prepaid $15,000 for the amortization payment originally scheduled for June 30, 2019 and September 30, 2019, respectively. As the prepayment amounts exceeded the revised scheduled quarterly amortization payment of $14,864 (as explained below), the excess payment was applied to the next scheduled quarterly amortization payment due as per the repayment schedule.

As of September 30, ~~2018,~~2019, there was no$13,128 of availability under the ~~$460~~$495 Million Credit Facility. Total debt repayments of $0$15,000 and $49,575 were made during the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2018 and 2017, respectively,~~2019 under the ~~$460~~$495 Million Credit ~~Facility.~~Facility, respectively. There were no debt repayments made under the $495 Million Credit Facility during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018. As of September 30, ~~2018~~2019 and December 31, ~~2017,~~2018, the total outstanding net debt balance was ~~$444,752~~$404,424 and ~~$0,~~$430,577, respectively.

The ~~$460~~$495 Million Credit Facility provides for the following key ~~terms:~~terms in relation to the $460,000 tranche:

The final maturity date ~~of the $460 Million Credit Facility~~ is May 31, 2023.

Table of Contents

Borrowings ~~under the $460 Million Credit Facility~~ bear interest at ~~LIBOR~~London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) plus 3.25% through December 31, 2018 and LIBOR plus a range of 3.00% and 3.50% thereafter, dependent upon the Company’s ratio of total net

~~Table of Contents~~

indebtedness to the last twelve months EBITDA. ~~Scheduled~~Original scheduled amortization payments ~~are~~were $15,000 per quarter commencing on December 31, 2018, with a final payment of $190,000 due on the maturity date. As a result of the $4,947 loan prepayment on April 15, 2019 as described above, scheduled amortization were recalculated in accordance with the terms of the facility. Scheduled amortization payments will be $14,864 per quarter commencing June 30, 2019, with a final payment of $187,601 due on the maturity date.

Scheduled amortization payments may be recalculated upon the Company’s request based on changes in collateral vessels, prepayments of the loan made as a result of a collateral vessel disposition as part of the Company’s fleet renewal program, or voluntary prepayments, subject in each case to a minimum repayment profile under which the loan will be repaid to nil when the average age of the vessels serving as collateral from time to time reaches 17 years. Mandatory prepayments are applied to remaining amortization payments pro rata, while voluntary prepayments are applied to remaining amortization payments in order of maturity.

Acquisitions and additional indebtedness are allowed subject to compliance with financial covenants, a collateral maintenance test, and other customary conditions.

The $495 Million Credit Facility provides for the following key terms in relation to the $35,000 tranche:

The final maturity date is May 31, 2023.

Borrowings under the tranche may be incurred pursuant to multiple drawings on or prior to March 30, 2020 in minimum amounts of $5,000 and may be used to finance up to 90% of the scrubber costs noted above.

Borrowings under the tranche will bear interest at LIBOR plus 2.50% through September 30, 2019 and LIBOR plus a range of 2.25% to 2.75% thereafter, dependent upon the Company’s ratio of total net indebtedness to the last twelve months’ EBITDA.

The tranche is subject to equal consecutive quarterly repayments commencing on the last day of the fiscal quarter ending March 31, 2020 in an amount reflecting a repayment profile whereby the loans shall have been repaid after four years calculated from March 31, 2020. Assuming that the full $35,000 is borrowed, each quarterly repayment amount was originally scheduled to be equal to $2,500. However, as a result of the $4,947 loan prepayment on April 15, 2019, the availability under the $35,000 tranche was reduced to $34,628. Assuming that the full $34,628 is borrowed, scheduled quarterly repayments would be approximately $2,473 commencing March 31, 2020.

The $495 Million Credit Facility provides for the following key terms:

Dividends may be paid ~~after December 31, 2018 (or potentially earlier if the Company elects to change the date of its first amortization payment due December 31, 2018 to an earlier date)~~ subject to customary conditions and a limitation of 50% of consolidated net income for the quarter preceding such dividend payment if the collateral maintenance test ratio is 200% or less for such ~~quarter.~~quarter, the full commitment of up to $35,000 for the scrubber tranche is assumed to be drawn. Refer to Note 17 — Subsequent Events for November 5, 2019 amendment to this dividend covenant.

Collateral vessels can be sold or disposed of without prepayment of the loan if a replacement vessel or vessels meeting certain requirements are included as collateral within ~~120~~180 days of such sale or disposition. In addition:

we must be in compliance with the collateral maintenance test;

the replacement vessels must become collateral for the loan; and either

the replacement vessels must have an equal or greater appraised value that the collateral vessels for which they are substituted, or

Table of Contents

ratio of the aggregate appraised value of the collateral vessels (including replacement vessels) to the outstanding loan amount after the collateral disposition (accounting for any prepayments of the loan by the time the replacement vessels become collateral vessels) must equal or exceed the aggregate appraised value of the collateral vessels to the outstanding loan before the collateral disposition.

Key financial covenants include:

minimum liquidity, with unrestricted cash and cash equivalents to equal or exceed the greater of $30,000 and 7.5% of total indebtedness (no restricted cash is required);

debt to capitalization, with the ratio of total indebtedness to total capitalization to be not more than 70%; and

collateral maintenance, with the aggregate appraised value of collateral vessels to be at least 135% of the principal amount of the loan outstanding under the ~~$460~~$495 Million Credit Facility.

Collateral includes the current vessels in the Company’s fleet other than the seven oldest vessels in the fleet which have been identified for sale, collateral vessel earnings and insurance, and time charters in excess of 24 months in respect of the collateral vessels.

~~Table of Contents~~

As of September 30, ~~2018,~~2019, the Company ~~believed it~~ was in compliance with all of the financial covenants under the ~~$460~~$495 Million Credit Facility.

$108 Million Credit Facility

On August 14, 2018, the Company entered into a five-year senior secured credit facility (the “$108 Million Credit Facility”) with Crédit Agricole Corporate & Investment Bank (“CACIB”), as Structurer and Bookrunner, CACIB and Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken AB (Publ) as Mandate Lead Arrangers, CACIB as Administrative Agent and as Security Agent, and the other lenders party thereto from time to time. The Company has used proceeds from the $108 Million Credit Facility to finance a portion of the purchase price for the six vessels, including four Capesize Vessels and two Ultramax vessels, which were delivered to the Company during the three months ended September 30, 2018 (refer to Note 4 — Vessel Acquisitions and Dispositions). These six vessels also serve as collateral under the $108 Million Credit Facility. The Company drew down a total of $108,000 during the three months ended September 30, 2018, which represents 45% of the appraised value of the six vessels.

As of September 30, 2019, there was no availability under the $108 Million Credit Facility. Total debt repayments of $1,580 and $4,740 were made during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019 under the $108 Million Credit Facility, respectively. There were no debt repayments made during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018 under the $108 Million Credit Facility. As of September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the total outstanding net debt balance was $100,127 and $104,571, respectively.

The $108 Million Credit Facility provides for the following key terms:

The final maturity date of the $108 Million Credit Facility is August 14, 2023.

Borrowings under the $108 Million Credit Facility bear interest at LIBOR plus 2.50% through September 30, 2019 and LIBOR plus a range of 2.25% to 2.75% thereafter, dependent upon the Company’s ratio of total net indebtedness to the last twelve months EBITDA.

Table of Contents

Mandatory prepayments are to be applied to remaining amortization payments pro rata, while voluntary prepayments are to be applied to remaining amortization payments in order of maturity.

Acquisitions and additional indebtedness are allowed subject to compliance with financial covenants (including a collateral maintenance test) and other customary conditions.

Key financial covenants are substantially similar to those under the Company’s $495 Million Credit Facility and include:

minimum liquidity, with unrestricted cash and cash equivalents to equal or exceed the greater of $30,000 and 7.5% of total indebtedness;

debt to capitalization, with the ratio of total indebtedness to total capitalization to be not more than 70%; and

collateral maintenance, with the aggregate appraised value of collateral vessels to be at least 135% of the principal amount of the loan outstanding under the $108 Million Credit Facility.

As of September 30, 2019, the Company was in compliance with all of the financial covenants under the $108 Million Credit Facility.

$400 Million Credit Facility

On November 10, 2016, the Company entered into a senior secured term loan facility, the $400 Million Credit Facility, in an aggregate principal amount of up to $400,000 with Nordea Bank Finland plc, New York Branch, Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken AB (publ), DVB Bank SE, ABN AMRO Capital USA LLC, Crédit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank, Deutsche Bank AG Filiale Deutschlandgeschäft, Crédit Industriel et Commercial and BNP Paribas. On November 15, 2016, the proceeds under the $400 Million Credit Facility were used to refinance six of the Company’s prior credit facilities. The $400 Million Credit Facility was collateralized by 45 of the Company’s vessels and at December 31, 2016, required the Company to sell five remaining unencumbered vessels, which were sold during the year ended December 31, 2017. ~~Refer to Note 4 — Vessel Acquisitions and Dispositions.~~ On November 14, 2016, the Company borrowed the maximum available amount of $400,000.

The $400 Million Credit Facility had a maturity date of November 15, 2021, and the principal borrowed under the facility bore interest at the LIBOR for an interest period of three months plus a margin of 3.75%. The Company had the option to pay 1.50% of such rate in-kind (“PIK interest”) through December 31, 2018, of which was payable on the maturity date of the facility. The Company opted to make the PIK interest election through September 29, ~~2017 and as~~2017. As of September 30, ~~2018~~2019 and December 31, ~~2017, had recorded $0 and $5,341 of~~2018, the Company did not have any PIK interest ~~which was recorded in Long-term debt in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2017.~~recorded. The $400 Million Credit Facility originally had scheduled amortization payments of (i) $100 per quarter through December 31, 2018, (ii) $7,610 per quarter from March 31, 2019 through December 31, 2020, (iii) $18,571 per quarter from March 31, 2021 through September 30, 2021 and (iv) $282,605 upon final maturity on November 15, 2021, which did not include PIK

Table of Contents

interest. Pursuant to the credit facility agreement, upon the payment of any excess cash flow to the lenders (see below), the scheduled repayments were adjusted to reflect the reduction of future amortization amounts.

There was no collateral maintenance testing for the $400 Million Credit Facility prior to June 30, 2018. Thereafter, there was to be required collateral maintenance testing with a gradually increasing threshold calculated as the value of the collateral under the facility as a percentage of the loan outstanding as follows: 105% from June 30, 2018 to December 30, 2018, 115% from December 31, 2018 to December 30, 2020 and 135% thereafter.

The $400 Million Credit Facility required the Company to comply with a number of covenants substantially similar to those in the Company’s other credit facilities, including financial covenants related to debt to total book capitalization, minimum working capital, minimum liquidity, and dividends; collateral maintenance requirements (as described above); and other customary covenants. The Company was required to maintain a ratio of total indebtedness to total capitalization of not greater than 0.70 to 1.00 at all times. Minimum working capital as defined in the $400 Million Credit Facility was not to be less than $0 at all times. The $400 Million Credit Facility had minimum liquidity requirements at all times for all vessels in its fleet of (i) $250 per vessel to and including December 31, 2018, (ii) $400 per vessel from January 1, 2019 to and including December 31, 2019 and (iii) $700 per vessel from January 1, 2020 and thereafter. The Company was prohibited from paying dividends without lender consent through December 31, 2020. The Company was able establish non-recourse subsidiaries to incur indebtedness or make investments, but it was restricted from incurring indebtedness or making investments (other than through non-recourse subsidiaries). Excess cash from the collateralized vessels under the $400 Million Credit Facility was subject to a cash sweep. The cash flow sweep was 100% of excess cash flow through December 31, 2018, 75% through December 31, 2020 and the lesser of 50% of excess cash flow or an amount that would reflect a 15-year average vessel age repayment profile thereafter; provided no prepayment under the cash sweep was required from the first $10,000 in aggregate of the prepayments otherwise required under the cash sweep. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018, the Company repaid $0 and $15,428, respectively, for the excess cash flow sweep.

AtThere were no debt repayments made during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the Company had deposited $0 and $11,180, respectively, that has been reflected as noncurrent restricted cash which represents restricted pledged liquidity amounts pursuant to2019 under the $400 Million Credit Facility.

~~Table of Contents~~

~~Total~~ There were no debt repayments ~~of $0 and $100 were~~ made during the three months ended September 30, 2018 and ~~2017, respectively, and total debt repayments of~~ $404,941 ~~(which includes~~(both which include $5,341 of PIK interest) ~~and $300 were~~of debt repayments made during the nine months ended September 30, 2018 ~~and 2017, respectively,~~ under the $400 Million Credit Facility.

On June 5, 2018, the $400 Million Credit Facility was refinanced with the ~~$460~~$495 Million Credit Facility; refer to the “$~~460~~495 Million Credit Facility” section above. ~~As of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the total outstanding net debt balance, including PIK interest as defined below, was $0 and $398,609, respectively.~~

$98 Million Credit Facility

On November 4, 2015, thirteen of the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiaries entered into a Facility Agreement, by and among such subsidiaries as borrowers (collectively, the “Borrowers”); Genco Holdings Limited, a direct subsidiary of Genco of which the Borrowers are direct subsidiaries (“Holdco”); certain funds managed or advised by Hayfin Capital Management, Breakwater Capital Ltd, or their nominee, as lenders; and Hayfin Services LLP, as agent and security agent (the “$98 Million Credit Facility”). The Borrowers borrowed the maximum available amount of $98,271 under the facility on November 10, 2015.

Borrowings under the facility were available for working capital purposes. The facility had a final maturity date of September 30, 2020, and the principal borrowed under the facility bore interest at LIBOR for an interest period of three months plus a margin of 6.125% per annum. The facility had no fixed amortization payments for the first two years and fixed amortization payments of $2,500 per quarter thereafter. To the extent the value of the collateral under the facility was 182% or less of the loan amount outstanding, the Borrowers were to prepay the loan from earnings received from operation of the thirteen collateral vessels after deduction of the following amounts: costs, fees, expenses, interest, and fixed principal repayments under the facility; operating expenses relating to the thirteen vessels; and the Borrowers’ pro rata share of general and administrative expenses based on the number of vessels they owned.

The Facility Agreement required the Borrowers and, in certain cases, the Company and Holdco to comply with a number of covenants substantially similar to those in the other credit facilities of Genco and its subsidiaries, including

Table of Contents

financial covenants related to maximum leverage, minimum consolidated net worth, minimum liquidity, and dividends; collateral maintenance requirements; and other customary covenants. The Company was prohibited from paying dividends under this facility until December 31, 2018. Following December 31, 2018, the amount of dividends the Company could pay was limited based on the amount of the repayment of at least $25,000 of the loan under such facility, as well as the ratio of the value of vessels and certain other collateral pledged under such facility. The Facility Agreement included usual and customary events of default and remedies for facilities of this nature.

Borrowings under the facility were secured by first priority mortgage on the vessels owned by the Borrowers, namely the Genco Constantine, the Genco Augustus, the Genco London, the Genco Titus, the Genco Tiberius, the Genco Hadrian, the Genco Knight, the Genco Beauty, the Genco Vigour, the Genco Predator, the Genco Cavalier, the Genco Champion, and the Genco Charger, and related collateral. Pursuant to the Facility Agreement and a separate Guarantee executed by the Company, the Company and Holdco were acting as guarantors of the obligations of the Borrowers and each other under the Facility Agreement and its related documentation.

On November 15, 2016, the Company entered into an Amending and Restating Agreement, which amended and restated the credit agreements and the guarantee for the $98 Million Credit Facility (the “Restated $98 Million Credit Facility”). The Restated $98 Million Credit Facility provided for the following: reductions in the minimum liquidity requirements consistent with the $400 Million Credit Facility, except the minimum liquidity amount for the collateral vessels under this facility was $750 per vessel, which was reflected as restricted cash; netting of certain amounts against the measurements of the collateral maintenance covenant, which remained in place with a 140% value to loan threshold; a portion of amounts required to be maintained under the minimum liquidity covenant for this facility may, under certain circumstances, have been used to prepay the facility to maintain compliance with the collateral maintenance covenant; elimination of the original maximum leverage ratio and minimum net worth covenants; and restrictions on incurring indebtedness, making investments (other than through non-recourse subsidiaries) or paying dividends, similar to those provided for in the $400 Million Credit Facility. The minimum working capital and the total indebtedness to total capitalization were the same as the $400 Million Credit Facility.

~~Table of Contents~~

As of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the Company had deposited $0 and $7,234, respectively, that was reflected as current restricted cash. As of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the Company had deposited $0 and $11,738, respectively, that was reflected as noncurrent restricted cash. These amounts included certain restricted deposits associated with the Debt Service Account, Capex Account and minimum liquidity amount as defined in the $98 Million Credit Facility.

There were no debt repayments made during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019 under the $98 Million Credit Facility. There were no debt repayments made during the three months ended September 30, 2018 and ~~2017, respectively, and total~~$93,939 of debt repayments ~~of $93,939 and $0~~made during the nine months ended September 30, 2018 ~~and 2017, respectively,~~ under the $98 Million Credit Facility.

On June 5, 2018, the $98 Million Credit Facility was refinanced with the ~~$460~~$495 Million Credit Facility; refer to the “$~~460~~495 Million Credit Facility” section above. ~~As of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the total outstanding net debt balance under the $98 Million Credit Facility was $0~~ ~~and $92,569, respectively.~~

2014 Term Loan Facilities

On October 8, 2014, Baltic Trading and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Baltic Hornet Limited and Baltic Wasp Limited, each entered into a loan agreement and related documentation for a credit facility in a principal amount of up to $16,800 with ABN AMRO Capital USA LLC and its affiliates (the “2014 Term Loan Facilities”) to partially finance the newbuilding Ultramax vessel that each subsidiary acquired, namely the Baltic Hornet and Baltic Wasp, respectively. Amounts borrowed under the 2014 Term Loan Facilities were not allowed to be reborrowed. The 2014 Term Loan Facilities had a ten-year term, and the facility amount was to be the lowest of 60% of the delivered cost per vessel, $16,800 per vessel, and 60% of the fair market value of each vessel at delivery. The 2014 Term Loan Facilities were insured by the China Export & Credit Insurance Corporation (Sinosure) in order to cover political and commercial risks for 95% of the outstanding principal plus interest, which was recorded in deferred financing fees. Borrowings under the 2014 Term Loan Facilities bore interest at the three or six-month LIBOR rate plus an applicable margin of 2.50% per annum. Borrowings were to be repaid in 20 equal consecutive semi-annual installments of 1/24 of the facility amount plus a balloon payment of 1/6 of the facility amount at final maturity. Principal repayments commenced six months after the actual delivery date for each respective vessel.

Borrowings under the 2014 Term Loan Facilities were secured by liens on the vessels acquired with borrowings under these facilities, namely the Baltic Hornet and Baltic Wasp, and other related assets. The Company guaranteed the obligations of the Baltic Hornet and Baltic Wasp under the 2014 Term Loan Facilities.

Table of Contents

On November 15, 2016, the Company entered into Supplemental Agreements with lenders under our 2014 Term Loan Facilities which, among other things, amended the Company’s collateral maintenance covenants under the 2014 Term Loan Facilities to provide that such covenants would not be tested through December 30, 2017 and the minimum collateral value to loan ratio was 100% from December 31, 2017, 105% from June 30, 2018, 115% from December 31, 2018 and 135% from December 31, 2019. These Supplemental Agreements also provided for certain other amendments to the 2014 Term Loan Facilities, which included reductions in the minimum liquidity requirements consistent with the $400 Million Credit Facility and restrictions on incurring indebtedness, making investments (other than through non-recourse subsidiaries) or paying dividends, similar to the $400 Million Credit Facility. Additionally, the minimum working capital required was the same as under the $400 Million Credit Facility. Lastly, the maximum leverage requirement was equivalent to the debt to total capitalization requirement in the $400 Million Credit Facility.

~~Total~~There were no debt repayments ~~of $0~~made during the three and ~~$681~~nine months ended September 30, 2019 under the 2014 Term Loan Facilities. There were no debt repayments made during the three months ended September 30, 2018 and ~~2017, respectively, and total~~$25,544 of debt repayments ~~of $25,544 and $2,062 were~~ made during the nine months ended September 30, 2018 ~~and 2017, respectively,~~ under the 2014 Term Loan Facilities.

On June 5, 2018, the 2014 Term Loan Facilities were refinanced with the ~~$460~~$495 Million Credit Facility; refer to the “$~~460~~495 Million Credit Facility” section above. ~~At September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the total outstanding net debt balance was $0 and $24,214, respectively.~~

~~Table of Contents~~

Interest rates

The following table sets forth the effective interest rate associated with the interest expense for the Company’s debt facilities noted above, including the cost associated with unused commitment fees, if applicable. The following table also includes the range of interest rates on the debt, excluding the impact of unused commitment fees, if applicable:


	For the Three Months Ended				For the Nine Months Ended				For the Three Months Ended				For the Nine Months Ended
	September 30,				September 30,				September 30,				September 30,
	2018		2017		2018		2017		2019		2018		2019		2018
Effective Interest Rate	5.32	%	5.42	%	5.80	%	5.24	%	5.31	%	5.32	%	5.44	%	5.80	%
Range of Interest Rates (excluding unused commitment fees)	4.56 % to 5.38	%	3.65 % to 7.46	%	3.83 % to 8.43	%	3.36 % to 7.46	%	4.54 % to 5.49	%	4.56 % to 5.38	%	4.54 % to 5.76	%	3.83 % to 8.43	%

8 - FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

The fair values and carrying values of the Company’s financial instruments at September 30, ~~2018~~2019 and December 31, ~~2017~~2018 which are required to be disclosed at fair value, but not recorded at fair value, are noted below.


	September 30, 2018				December 31, 2017				September 30, 2019				December 31, 2018
	Carrying				Carrying				Carrying				Carrying
	Value		Fair Value		Value		Fair Value		Value		Fair Value		Value		Fair Value
Cash and cash equivalents	$	165,724	$	165,724	$	174,479	$	174,479	$	165,876	$	165,876	$	197,499	$	197,499
Restricted cash		315		315		30,467		30,467		315		315		5,262		5,262
Floating rate debt		568,000		568,000		524,424		524,424		518,605		518,605		551,420		551,420

The carrying value of the borrowings under the ~~$460~~$495 Million Credit Facility and the $108 Million Credit Facility as of September 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~the $400 Million Credit Facility, $98 Million Credit Facility and the 2014 Term Loan Facilities as of~~ December 31, ~~2017~~2018 approximate their fair value due to the variable interest nature thereof as each of these credit facilities represent floating rate loans. Refer to Note 7 — Debt for further information regarding the Company’s credit facilities. The ~~$460~~$495 Million Credit Facility was utilized to refinance the $400 Million Credit Facility, $98 Million Credit Facility and 2014 Term Loan Facilities on June 5, ~~2018.~~2018 and was subsequently amended on February 28, 2019. The carrying amounts of the Company’s other financial instruments at September 30, ~~2018~~2019 and December 31, ~~2017~~2018 (principally Due from charterers and Accounts payable and accrued expenses) approximate fair values because of the relatively short maturity of these instruments.

Table of Contents

ASC Subtopic 820-10, “Fair Value Measurements & Disclosures” (“ASC 820-10”), applies to all assets and liabilities that are being measured and reported on a fair value basis. This guidance enables the reader of the financial statements to assess the inputs used to develop those measurements by establishing a hierarchy for ranking the quality and reliability of the information used to determine fair values. The fair value framework requires the categorization of assets and liabilities into three levels based upon the assumption (inputs) used to price the assets or liabilities. Level 1 provides the most reliable measure of fair value, whereas Level 3 requires significant management judgment. The three levels are defined as follows:

Level 1—Valuations based on quoted prices in active markets for identical instruments that the Company is able to access. Since valuations are based on quoted prices that are readily and regularly available in an active market, valuation of these instruments does not entail a significant degree of judgment.

Level 2—Valuations based on quoted prices in active markets for instruments that are similar, or quoted prices in markets that are not active for identical or similar instruments, and model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs and significant value drivers are observable in active markets.

Level 3—Valuations based on inputs that are unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement.

~~Table of Contents~~

Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash are considered Level 1 items, as they represent liquid assets with short-term maturities. Floating rate debt is considered to be a Level 2 item, as the Company considers the estimate of rates it could obtain for similar debt or based upon transactions amongst third parties. Nonrecurring fair value measurements include vessel impairment assessments completed during the interim period and at year-end as determined based on third-party quotes, which are based ~~off of~~on various data points, including comparable sales of similar vessels, which are Level 2 inputs. During the nine months ended September 30, 2019, the vessel assets for five of the Company’s vessels were written down as part of the impairment recorded during the nine months ended September 30, 2019.During the nine months ended September 30, 2018, the vessels assets for ten of the Company’s vessels were written down as part of the impairment recorded during the nine months ended September 30, 2018. ~~As of June 30, 2017, the vessel asset for the Genco Surprise was written down as part of the impairment recorded during the nine months ended September 30, 2017.~~ During the three months ended September 30, 2017, the vessel assets for the five 1999-built vessels were written down as part of the impairment recorded during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017. Refer to “Impairment of vessel assets” section in Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies. Nonrecurring fair value measurements also include impairment tests conducted by the Company during the nine months ended September 30, 2019 of its operating lease right-of use asset. The fair value determination for the operating lease right-of-use asset was based on third party quotes, which is considered a Level 2 input. During the nine months ended September 30, 2019, the operating lease right-of-use asset was written down as part of the impairment of right-of-use asset recorded during the nine months ended September 30, 2019. Refer to Note 13 — Leases. The Company did not have any Level 3 financial assets or liabilities as of September 30, ~~2018~~2019 and December 31, ~~2017.~~2018.

9 - PREPAID EXPENSES AND OTHER CURRENT ASSETS

Prepaid expenses and other current assets consist of the following:


	September 30,		December 31,
	2019		2018
Vessel stores	$	669	$	597
Capitalized contract costs		3,656		2,289
Prepaid items		2,301		3,426
Insurance receivable		1,744		851
Advance to agents		508		1,109
Other		1,118		2,177
Total prepaid expenses and other current assets	$	9,996	$	10,449

September 30,

December 31,


2018

2017

Vessel stores

$
666

$
642

Capitalized contract costs

1,676

—

Prepaid items

2,057

1,452

Insurance receivable

1,021

3,498

Other

4,652

1,746

Total prepaid expenses and other current assets

$
10,072

$
7,338

Table of Contents

10 - FIXED ASSETS

Fixed assets, net consists of the following:


	September 30,		December 31,		September 30,		December 31,
	2018		2017		2019		2018
Fixed assets, at cost:
Vessel equipment	$	2,000	$	1,375	$	6,179	$	2,873
Furniture and fixtures		462		462		467		462
Leasehold improvements						97		—
Computer equipment		210		180		275		236
Total costs		2,672		2,017		7,018		3,571
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization	��	(1,177)		(1,003)		(1,789)		(1,281)
Total fixed assets, net	$	1,495	$	1,014	$	5,229	$	2,290

Depreciation and amortization expense for fixed assets for the three months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018 was $259 and ~~2017 was~~ $86, ~~and $67,~~ respectively. Depreciation and amortization expense for fixed assets for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018 was $626 and ~~2017 was~~ $230, ~~and $203,~~ respectively.

~~Table of Contents~~

11 - ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND ACCRUED EXPENSES

Accounts payable and accrued expenses consist of the following:


	September 30,		December 31,		September 30,		December 31,
	2018		2017		2019		2018
Accounts payable	$	17,661	$	9,863	$	20,830	$	15,110
Accrued general and administrative expenses		4,460		2,978		3,120		4,298
Accrued vessel operating expenses		10,963		10,389		17,195		9,735
Total accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	33,084	$	23,230	$	41,145	$	29,143

12 – VOYAGE REVENUE

Total voyage revenue includes revenue earned on fixed rate time charters, spot market voyage charters and spot market-related time charters, ~~and vessel pools,~~ as well as the sale of bunkers consumed during short-term time charters. For the three months ended September 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017,~~2018, the Company earned ~~$92,263~~$103,776 and ~~$51,161~~$92,263 of voyage ~~revenue, respectively. Included in voyage revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017 was $0 and $1 of net profit sharing~~ revenue, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017,~~2018, the Company earned ~~$255,336~~$280,790 and ~~$134,780~~$255,336 of voyage ~~revenue, respectively. Included in voyage revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, the Company earned $0 and $2,325 of net profit sharing~~ revenue, respectively.

~~On January 1, 2018 the Company adopted the revenue recognition guidance under ASC 606 (refer to Note 2~~ — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies) using the modified retrospective method applied to contracts that were not completed as of January 1, 2018. The financial results for reporting periods beginning after January 1, 2018 are presented under the new guidance, while prior period amounts are not adjusted and will be continued to be reported under previous guidance.

As a result of the adoption of the new revenue recognition guidance on January 1, 2018, the Company recorded a net increase to the opening retained deficit of $659 for the cumulative impact of adopting the new guidance. The impact related primarily to the change in accounting for spot market voyage charters. Prior to the adoption of the new guidance, revenueRevenue for spot market voyage charters ~~was~~is recognized ratably over the total transit time of the voyage which previously commenced the latter of when the vessel departed from its last discharge port and when an agreement was entered into with the charterer, and ended at the time the discharge of cargo was completed at the discharge port. As a result of the adoption of the new guidance, revenue for spot market voyage charters is now being recognized ratably over the total transit time of the voyage which now begins when the vessel arrives at the loading port and ends at the time the discharge of cargo is completed at the discharge ~~port.~~port in accordance with ASC 606. Spot market voyage charter agreements do not provide the charterers with substantive decision-making rights to direct how and for what purpose the vessel is used, therefore revenue from spot market voyage charters is not within the scope of ASC 842. Additionally, the Company has identified that the contract fulfillment costs of spot market voyage charters consist primarily of the fuel consumption that is incurred by the Company from the latter of the end of the previous vessel employment and the contract date until the arrival at the loading port in addition to any port expenses incurred prior to arrival at the load port, as well as any charter hire expenses for third-party vessels that are ~~chartered-in.~~chartered in. The fuel consumption during this period is capitalized and recorded in Prepaid expenses and other current assets in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet and is amortized ratably over the total transit time of the voyage from arrival at the loading port until the vessel departs from the discharge port and expensed as part of Voyage Expenses. Refer also to Note 9 — Prepaid Expenses and Other Current Assets.

2827

Table of Contents

~~The following table illustrates~~During time charter agreements, including fixed rate time charters and spot market-related time charters, the ~~impact of~~charterers have substantive decision-making rights to direct how and for what purpose the ~~adoption of~~vessel is used. As such, the ~~new revenue recognition guidance on~~Company has identified that time charter agreements contain a lease in accordance with ASC 842. During time charter agreements, the Company is responsible for operating and maintaining the vessels. These costs are recorded as vessel operating expenses in the Condensed Consolidated ~~Balance Sheet:~~Statements of Operation. The Company has elected the practical expedient that allows the Company to combine lease and non-lease components under ASC 842 as the Company believes (1) the timing and pattern of recognizing revenues for operating the vessel is the same as the timing and pattern of recognizing vessel leasing revenue; and (2) the lease component, if accounted for separately, would be classified as an operating lease.

As of September 30, 2018

Balance

without Adoption



of New Revenue

Effect of


As Reported

Standard

Change

Assets

Current assets:

Due from charterers

$
18,536

$
20,974

$
(2,438)

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

10,072

8,396

1,676

Liabilities and Equity

Current liabilities:

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

$
33,084

$
33,123

$
(39)

Deferred revenue

10,231

8,402

1,829

Equity:

Retained deficit

$
(705,556)

$
(703,004)

$
(2,552)

~~The following table illustrates the impact of the adoption of the new~~Total voyage revenue ~~recognition guidance on~~recognized in the Condensed Consolidated ~~Statement~~Statements of ~~Operations:~~

For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2018

Balance

without Adoption

of New Revenue

Effect of

As Reported

Standard

Change

Voyage revenues

$
92,263

$
95,123

$
(2,860)

Voyage expenses

31,475

32,512

(1,037)

Net income

5,708

7,531

(1,823)

Net earnings per share-basic

$
0.14

$
0.18

$
(0.04)

Net earnings per share-diluted

$
0.14

$
0.18

$
(0.04)

~~Table of Contents~~

For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018

Balance

without Adoption

of New Revenue

Effect of

As Reported

Standard

Change

Voyage revenues

$
255,336

$
258,450

$
(3,114)

Voyage expenses

78,551

79,772

(1,221)

Net loss

(51,224)

(49,331)

(1,893)

Net loss per share-basic

$
(1.37)

$
(1.32)

$
(0.05)

Net loss per share-diluted

$
(1.37)

$
(1.32)

$
(0.05)

~~The following table illustrates~~Operations includes the ~~impact of the adoption of the new revenue recognition guidance on the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows:~~following:

For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018

Balance

without Adoption



of New Revenue

Effect of


As Reported

Standard

Change
Cash flows from operating activities:

     Change in assets and liabilities:

     Increase in due from charterers

$
(6,329)

$
(8,119)

$
1,790
     Increase in prepaid expenses and other current assets

(5,966)

(4,765)

(1,201)
     Increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses

8,169

8,202

(33)
     Increase in deferred revenue

5,017

3,680

1,337

~~Table of Contents~~

~~The following table illustrates the cumulative effect of the adoption of the new revenue recognition guidance on the opening Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet:~~

New

Balance at

Revenue

Balance at


December 31,

Standard

January 1,


2017

Adjustment

2018

Assets

Current assets:

Due from charterers

$
12,855

$
(647)

$
12,208

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

7,338

475

7,813

Liabilities and Equity

Current liabilities:

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

$
23,230

$
(6)

$
23,224

Deferred revenue

4,722

493

5,215

Equity:

Retained deficit

$
(653,673)

$
(659)

$
(654,332)


	For the Three Months Ended				For the Nine Months Ended
	September 30,				September 30,
	2019		2018		2019		2018
Lease revenue	$	29,619	$	41,184	$	78,861	$	128,025
Spot market voyage revenue		74,157		51,079		201,929		127,311
Total voyage revenues	$	103,776	$	92,263	$	280,790	$	255,336

13 - ~~COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES~~LEASES

Effective April 4, 2011, the Company entered into a seven-year sub-sublease agreement for ~~additional~~its main office ~~space~~ in New York, New York. The term of the sub-sublease commenced June 1, 2011, with a free base rental period until October 31, 2011. Following the expiration of the free base rental period, the monthly base rental payments were $82 per month until May 31, 2015 and thereafter ~~will be~~were $90 per month until the end of the seven-year term. Pursuant to the sub-sublease agreement, the sublessor was obligated to contribute $472 toward the cost of the Company’s alterations to the sub-subleased office space. The Company has also entered into a direct lease with the over-landlord of such office space that commenced immediately upon the expiration of such sub-sublease agreement, for a term covering the period from May 1, 2018 to September 30, 2025; the direct lease ~~provides~~provided for a free base rental period from May 1, 2018 to September 30, 2018. Following the expiration of the free base rental period, the monthly base rental payments are $186 per month from October 1, 2018 to April 30, 2023 and $204 per month from May 1, 2023 to September 30, 2025. For accounting purposes, the sub-sublease agreement and direct lease agreement with the landlord ~~constitutes~~constitute one lease agreement.

The Company adopted ASC 842 using the transition method on January 1, 2019 (refer to Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies) and has identified this lease as an operating lease. Variable rent expense, such as utilities and escalation expenses, are excluded from the determination of the operating lease liability, as the Company has deemed these insignificant.

On June 14, 2019, the Company entered into a sublease agreement for a portion of the leased space for its main office in New York, New York that commenced on July 26, 2019 and will end on September 29, 2025. There is a free base rental period for the first four and a half months commencing on July 26, 2019. Following the expiration of the free base rental period, the monthly base sublease income will be $102 per month until September 29, 2025. The sublease income for the portion of the leased space is less than the lease payments due for the space, which has been identified as an indicator of impairment under ASC 360. As such, the right-of-use asset for the subleased portion of the space was written down to its fair value during the second quarter of 2019 which resulted in $223 of impairment charges which has been recorded in Impairment of right-of-asset in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operation during the nine months ended September 30, 2019. Sublease income will be recorded net with the total operating lease costs in General

Table of Contents

and administrative expenses in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operation. There was no sublease income recorded during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019 as a result of the ~~straight-line rent calculation generated by~~free rental period.

Total operating lease costs recorded during the ~~free rent period~~three and ~~the tenant work credit, the monthly straight-line rental expense for the term from the Effective Date to~~nine months ended September 30, ~~2025 is $150. The~~2019 were $490 and $1,396, respectively, which was recorded in General and administrative expenses in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operation.

Supplemental Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet information related to the Company’s operating leases as of September 30, 2019 are as follows:


	September 30,
	2019
Operating Lease:
Operating lease right-of-use asset	$	8,576

Current operating lease liabilities	$	1,655
Long-term operating lease liabilities		10,253
Total operating lease liabilities	$	11,908

Weighted average remaining lease term (years)		6.01
Weighted average discount rate		5.15	%

Maturities of operating lease liabilities as of September 30, 2019 are as follows:


	September 30,
	2019
Remainder of 2019	$	557
2020		2,230
2021		2,230
2022		2,230
2023		2,378
Thereafter		4,292
Total lease payments		13,917
Less imputed interest		(2,009)
Present value of lease liabilities	$	11,908

Maturities of operating lease liabilities as of December 31, 2018 are as follows:


	December 31,
	2018
2019	$	2,230
2020		2,230
2021		2,230
2022		2,230
2023		2,378
Thereafter		4,292
Total lease payments		15,590

Table of Contents

Supplemental Condensed Consolidated Cash Flow information related to leases are as follows:


	For the Nine
	Months Ended
	September 30,
	2019
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities:
Operating cash flows from operating lease	$	1,672

Under the previous leasing guidance under ASC 840, the Company had ~~a long-term lease obligation~~deferred rent at ~~September 30, 2018 and~~ December 31, ~~2017~~2018 of ~~$3,576 and $2,588, respectively.~~$3,468. Rent expense pertaining to this lease for the three ~~months ended September 30, 2018~~ and ~~2017 was $452 during both periods and $1,356 during the~~ nine months ended September 30, 2018 under ASC 840 was $452 and ~~2017.~~$1,356, respectively.

~~Future minimum rental payments~~During the second quarter of 2018, the Company began chartering-in third-party vessels. Under ASC 842, the Company is the lessee in these agreements. The Company has elected the practical expedient under ASC 842 to not recognize right-of-use assets and lease liabilities for short-term leases. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019, all charter-in agreements for third-party vessels were less than twelve months and considered short-term leases. Refer to Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies for the charter hire expenses recorded during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018 for these charter-in agreements.

14 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

During the second half of 2018, the Company entered into agreements for the purchase of ballast water treatments systems (“BWTS”) for 43 of its vessels. The cost of these systems will vary based on the ~~above lease~~size and specifications of each vessel and whether the systems will be installed in China during the vessels’ scheduled drydockings. Based on the contractual purchase price of the BWTS and the estimated installation fees, the Company estimates the cost of the systems to be approximately $0.8 million for ~~the next five years~~Capesize vessels, $0.5 million for Panamax vessels, $0.5 million for Supramax vessels and ~~thereafter are as follows: $557~~$0.5 million for Handysize vessels. These costs will be capitalized and depreciated over the remainder of ~~2018, $2,230 annually for 2019, 2020, 2021 and 2022, and a total of $6,671 for~~ the ~~remaining term~~life of the ~~lease.~~vessel. The Company recorded $11,286 and $1,804 in Vessel assets in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively, related to BWTS additions.

14On December 21, 2018, the Company entered into agreements to install scrubbers on its 17 Capesize vessels. The Company anticipates scrubber installation on the 17 Capesize vessels to be completed during 2019 and estimate that the cost of each scrubber, including installation, will be approximately $2.25 million per vessel, which may vary according to the specifications of our vessels and technical aspects of the installation, among other variables. These costs will be capitalized and depreciated over the remainder of the life of the vessel. The Company recorded $32,156, and $428 in Vessel assets in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively, related to scrubber additions. The Company has entered into an amendment to the $495 Million Credit Facility to provide financing to cover a portion of these expenses, refer to Note 7 — Debt for further information.

15 - STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

2014 Management Incentive Plan

On the Effective Date, pursuant to the Chapter 11 Plan, the Company adopted the Genco Shipping & Trading Limited 2014 Management Incentive Plan (the “MIP”). An aggregate of 966,806 shares of Common Stock were available for award under the MIP. Awards under the MIP took the form of restricted stock grants and three tiers of MIP Warrants with staggered strike prices based on increasing equity values. The number of shares of common stock available under the Plan represented approximately 1.8% of the shares of post-emergence Common Stock outstanding as

~~Table of Contents~~

of the Effective Date on a fully-diluted basis. Awards under the MIP were available to eligible employees, non-employee directors and/or officers of the Company and its subsidiaries (collectively, “Eligible Individuals”). Under the MIP, a

Table of Contents

committee appointed by the Board from time to time (or, in the absence of such a committee, the Board) (in either case, the “Plan Committee”) could grant a variety of stock-based incentive awards, as the Plan Committee deems appropriate, to Eligible Individuals. The MIP Warrants are exercisable on a cashless basis and contain customary anti-dilution protection in the event of any stock split, reverse stock split, stock dividend, reclassification, dividend or other distributions (including, but not limited to, cash dividends), or business combination transaction.

On August 7, 2014, pursuant to the MIP, certain individuals were granted MIP Warrants whereby each warrant can be converted on a cashless basis for the amount in excess of the respective strike price. The MIP Warrants were issued in three tranches for 238,066, 246,701 and 370,979 shares and have exercise prices of $259.10 (the “$259.10 Warrants”), $287.30 (the “$287.30 Warrants”) and $341.90 (the “$341.90 Warrants”) per whole share, respectively. The fair value of each warrant upon emergence from bankruptcy was $7.22 for the $259.10 Warrants, $6.63 for the $287.30 Warrants and $5.63 for the $341.90 Warrants. The warrant values were based upon a calculation using the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing formula. This model uses inputs such as the underlying price of the shares issued when the warrant is exercised, volatility, cost of capital interest rate and expected life of the instrument. The Company has determined that the warrants should be classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy by evaluating each input for the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing formula against the fair value hierarchy criteria and using the lowest level of input as the basis for the fair value classification. The Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing formula used a volatility of 43.91% (representing the six-year volatility of a peer group), a risk-free interest rate of 1.85% and a dividend rate of 0%. The aggregate fair value of these awards upon emergence from bankruptcy was $54,436. The warrants vested 33.33% on each of the first three anniversaries of the grant date, with accelerated vesting upon a change in control of the Company.

For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, ~~and 2017, the Company recognized~~there was no amortization expense of the fair value of these ~~warrants, which is included in General and administrative expenses, as follows:~~

For the Three Months Ended

For the Nine Months Ended

September 30,

September 30,


2018

2017

2018

2017

General and administrative expenses

$
—

$
153

$
—

$
902

warrants. As of September 30, ~~2018,~~2019, there was no unamortized stock-based compensation for the warrants and all warrants were vested.

The following table summarizes certain information about the warrants outstanding as of September 30, ~~2018:~~2019:

Warrants Outstanding and Unvested,

Warrants Outstanding and Exercisable,

September 30, 2018

September 30, 2018

Weighted

Weighted

Weighted

Average

Weighted

Average

Weighted

Average

Exercise Price of

Average

Remaining

Average

Remaining

Outstanding

Number of

Exercise

Contractual

Number of

Exercise

Contractual

Warrants

Warrants

Price

Life

Warrants

Price

Life

$
303.12

—

$
—

—

8,557,461

$
303.12

1.86

Warrants Outstanding and Unvested,

Warrants Outstanding and Exercisable,

September 30, 2019

Weighted

Average

Weighted

Average

Remaining

Average

Remaining

Number of

Exercise

Contractual

Number of

Exercise

Contractual

Warrants

Price

Life

Warrants

Price

Life

—

8,557,461

303.12

0.86

As of September 30, ~~2018~~2019 and December 31, ~~2017,~~2018, a total of 8,557,461 of warrants were outstanding.

~~The nonvested stock awards granted under the MIP vested ratably on each of the three anniversaries of August 7, 2014. As of September 30, 2018, all stock awards granted under the MIP were vested.~~

~~Table of Contents~~

The total fair value of MIP restricted shares that vested during the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017 was $0 and $106, respectively. The total fair value is calculated as the number of shares vested during the period multiplied by the fair value on the vesting date.

For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, the Company recognized nonvested stock amortization expense for the MIP restricted shares, which is included in General and administrative expenses, as follows:

For the Three Months Ended

For the Nine Months Ended

September 30,

September 30,

2018

2017

2018

2017

General and administrative expenses

$
—

$
62

$
—

$
368

~~The Company amortized these grants over the applicable vesting periods, net of anticipated forfeitures. As of September 30, 2018, there was $0 of unrecognized compensation cost.~~

2015 Equity Incentive Plan

On June 26, 2015, the Company’s Board of Directors approved the 2015 Equity Incentive Plan for awards with respect to an aggregate of 400,000 shares of common stock (the “2015 Plan”). Under the 2015 Plan, the Company’s Board of Directors, the compensation committee, or another designated committee of the Board of Directors may grant a variety of stock-based incentive awards to the Company’s officers, directors, employees, and consultants. Awards may consist of stock options, stock appreciation rights, dividend equivalent rights, restricted (nonvested) stock, restricted stock units, and unrestricted stock. As of September 30, ~~2018,~~2019, the Company has awarded restricted stock units, restricted stock and stock options under the 2015 Plan.

On March 23, 2017, the Board of Directors approved an amendment and restatement of the 2015 Plan. This amendment and restatement increased the number of shares available for awards under the plan from 400,000 to 2,750,000, subject to shareholder approval; set the annual limit for awards to non-employee directors and other individuals as 500,000 and 1,000,000 shares, respectively; and modified the change in control definition. The

Table of Contents

Company’s shareholder’s approved the increase in the number of shares at the Company’s 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders on May 17, 2017.

Stock Options

On March 23, 2017, the Company issued options to purchase 133,000 of the Company’s shares of common stock to John C. Wobensmith, Chief Executive Officer and President, with an exercise price of $11.13 per share. One third of the options become exercisable on each of the first three anniversaries of October 15, 2016, with accelerated vesting upon a change in control of the Company, and all unexercised options expire on the sixth anniversary of the grant date. The fair value of each option was estimated on the date of the grant using the Black-Scholes-Merton pricing formula, resulting in a value of $6.41 per share, or $853 in the aggregate. The assumptions used in the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing formula are as follows: volatility of 79.80% (representing a blend of the Company’s historical volatility and a peer-based volatility ~~estimate)~~estimate due to limited trading history since emergence from bankruptcy), a risk-free interest rate of 1.68%, a dividend yield of 0%, and expected life of 3.78 years (determined using the simplified method as outlined in Staff Accounting Bulletin 14 – Share-Based Payment (“SAB Topic 14”) due to lack of historical exercise data).

On February 27, 2018, the Company issued options to purchase 122,608 of the Company’s shares of common stock to certain individuals with an exercise price of $13.69 per share. One third of the options become exercisable on each of the first three anniversaries of February 27, 2018, with accelerated vesting that may occur following a change in control of the Company, and all unexercised options expire on the sixth anniversary of the grant date. The fair value of each option was estimated on the date of the grant using the Black-Scholes-Merton pricing formula, resulting in a value of $7.55 per share, or $926 in the aggregate. The assumptions used in the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing formula are as follows: volatility of 71.94% (representing a blend of the Company’s historical volatility and a peer-based volatility ~~estimate)~~estimate due to limited trading history post recapitalization of the Company in November 2016), a risk-free interest rate of 2.53%, a dividend yield of 0%, and expected life of 4.00 years (determined using the simplified method as outlined in SAB Topic 14 due to lack of historical exercise data).

On March 4, 2019, the Company issued options to purchase 240,540 of the Company’s shares of common stock to certain individuals with an exercise price of $8.39 per share. One third of the options become exercisable on each of the first three anniversaries of March 4, 2019, with accelerated vesting that may occur following a change in control of the Company, and all unexercised options expire on the sixth anniversary of the grant date. The fair value of each option was estimated on the date of the grant using the Black-Scholes-Merton pricing formula, resulting in a value of $3.76 per share, or $904 in the aggregate. The assumptions used in the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing formula are as follows: volatility of 55.23% (representing the Company’s historical volatility), a risk-free interest rate of 2.49%, a dividend yield of 0%, and expected life of 4.00 years (determined using the simplified method as outlined in SAB Topic 14 due to lack of historical exercise data).

~~Table of Contents~~

For the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017,~~2018, the Company recognized amortization expense of the fair value of these options, which is included in General and administrative expenses, as follows:

For the Three Months Ended

For the Nine Months Ended

September 30,

September 30,

2018

2017

2018

2017

General and administrative expenses

$
216

$
201

$
553

$
419


	For the Three Months Ended				For the Nine Months Ended
	September 30,				September 30,
	2019		2018		2019		2018
General and administrative expenses	$	232	$	216	$	642	$	553

Amortization of the unamortized stock-based compensation balance of ~~$713~~$798 as of September 30, ~~2018~~2019 is expected to be expensed ~~$178, $392, $127~~$208, $431, $142 and ~~$16~~$17 during the remainder of ~~2018~~2019 and during the years ended December 31, ~~2019,~~ 2020, 2021 and ~~2021,~~2022, respectively. The following table summarizes the unvested option activity for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2018:~~2019:

Table of Contents


		Weighted		Weighted		Number of	Average Exercise		Average Fair
	Number of	Average Exercise		Average Fair		Options	Price		Value
	Options	Price		Value
Outstanding at January 1, 2018 - Unvested	88,667	$	11.13	$	6.41
Outstanding at January 1, 2019 - Unvested						166,942	$	13.01	$	7.25
Granted	122,608		13.69		7.55	240,540		8.39		3.76
Exercisable	—		—		—	(40,869)		13.69		7.55
Exercised	—		—		—	—		—		—
Forfeited	—		—		—	—		—		—

Outstanding at September 30, 2018 - Unvested	211,275	$	12.62	$	7.07
Outstanding at September 30, 2019 - Unvested						366,613	$	9.90	$	4.93

The following table summarizes certain information about the options outstanding as of September 30, ~~2018:~~2019

Options Outstanding and Unvested,

Options Outstanding and Exercisable,

Options Outstanding and Unvested,

Options Outstanding and Exercisable,

September 30, 2018

September 30, 2019

Weighted

Average

Weighted

Average

Weighted

Average

Weighted

Average

Weighted

Average

Exercise Price of

Average

Remaining

Average

Remaining

Exercise Price of

Average

Remaining

Average

Remaining

Outstanding

Number of

Exercise

Contractual

Number of

Exercise

Contractual

Outstanding

Number of

Exercise

Contractual

Number of

Exercise

Contractual

Options

Price

Life

Warrants

Price

Life

Options

Price

Life

Options

Price

Life

12.36

211,275

12.62

5.02

44,333

11.13

4.48

10.43

366,613

9.90

4.97

129,535

11.94

2.87

As of September 30, ~~2018~~2019 and December 31, ~~2017,~~2018, a total of ~~255,608~~496,148 and ~~133,000~~255,608 stock options were outstanding, respectively.

Restricted Stock Units

The Company has issued restricted stock units (“RSUs”) under the 2015 Plan to certain members of the Board of Directors and certain executives and employees of the Company, which represent the right to receive a share of common stock, or in the sole discretion of the Company’s Compensation Committee, the value of a share of common stock on the date that the RSU vests. As of September 30, ~~2018~~2019 and December 31, ~~2017, 118,838~~2018, 228,781 and ~~118,838~~216,304 shares of the Company’s common stock were outstanding in respect of the RSUs, respectively. Such shares of common stock will only be issued in respect of vested RSUs issued to directors when the director’s service with the Company as a director terminates. Such shares of common stock will only be issued to executives and employees when their RSUs vest under the terms of their grant agreements and the amended 2015 Plan described above. ~~On May 17, 2017, 18,234 shares of common stock were issued to Eugene Davis, the former Chairman of the Audit Committee, in respect of vested RSUs following his departure from the Board.~~

~~Table of Contents~~

The RSUs that have been issued to certain members of the Board of Directors generally vest on the date of the annual shareholders meeting of the Company following the date of the grant. The RSUs that have been issued to other individuals vest ratably on each of the three anniversaries of the determined vesting date. The table below summarizes the Company’s unvested RSUs for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2018:~~2019:


		Weighted			Weighted
	Number of	Average Grant		Number of	Average Grant
	RSUs	Date Price		RSUs	Date Price
Outstanding at January 1, 2018	220,129	$	11.01
Outstanding at January 1, 2019				149,170	$	12.42
Granted	51,704		14.84	135,659		8.44
Vested	(25,197)		10.12	(26,745)		15.92
Forfeited	—		—	—		—

Outstanding at September 30, 2018	246,636	$	11.91
Outstanding at September 30, 2019				258,084	$	9.96

Table of Contents

The total fair value of the RSUs that vested during the nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018 was $230 and ~~2017 was~~ $450, ~~and $675,~~ respectively. The total fair value is calculated as the number of shares vested during the period multiplied by the fair value on the vesting date.

The following table summarizes certain information of the RSUs unvested and vested as of September 30, ~~2018:~~2019:

Unvested RSUs

Vested RSUs

Unvested RSUs

Vested RSUs

September 30, 2018

September 30, 2019

Weighted

Average

Weighted

Average

Weighted

Average

Remaining

Average

Remaining

Average

Number of

Grant Date

Contractual

Number of

Grant Date

Contractual

Number of

Grant Date

RSUs

Price

Life

RSUs

Price

Life

RSUs

Price

246,636

11.91

1.23

196,769

11.23

258,084

9.96

1.22

320,980

11.59

The Company is amortizing these grants over the applicable vesting periods, net of anticipated forfeitures. As of September 30, ~~2018,~~2019, unrecognized compensation cost of ~~$951~~$866 related to RSUs will be recognized over a weighted-average period of ~~1.23~~1.22 years.

For the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017,~~2018, the Company recognized nonvested stock amortization expense for the RSUs, which is included in General and administrative expenses as follows:

For the Three Months Ended

For the Nine Months Ended

September 30,

September 30,

2018

2017

2018

2017

General and administrative expenses

$
425

$
830

$
1,213

$
1,822


	For the Three Months Ended				For the Nine Months Ended
	September 30,				September 30,
	2019		2018		2019		2018
General and administrative expenses	$	343	$	425	$	954	$	1,213

~~Table of Contents~~

Restricted Stock

Under the 2015 Plan, grants of restricted common stock issued to executives ordinarily vest ratably on each of the three anniversaries of the determined vesting date. ~~The table below summarizes the Company’s nonvested~~As of September 30, 2019, all restricted stock awards ~~for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 which were issued~~ under the 2015 ~~Plan:~~Plan were vested.

Weighted

Number of

Average Grant

Shares

Date Price

Outstanding at January 1, 2018

6,802

$
5.20

Granted

—

—

Vested

—

—

Forfeited

—

—

Outstanding at September 30, 2018

6,802

$
5.20

There were no shares that vested under the 2015 Plan during the nine months ended September 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017.~~2018. The total fair value is calculated as the number of shares vested during the period multiplied by the fair value on the vesting date.

For the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017,~~2018, the Company recognized nonvested stock amortization expense for the 2015 Plan restricted shares, which is included in General and administrative expenses, as follows:

For the Three Months Ended

For the Nine Months Ended

September 30,

September 30,

2018

2017

2018

2017

General and administrative expenses
$
3

$
9

$
10

$
25


	For the Three Months Ended				For the Nine Months Ended
	September 30,				September 30,
	2019		2018		2019		2018
General and administrative expenses	$	—	$	3	$	—	$	10

The Company ~~is amortizing~~amortized these grants over the applicable vesting periods, net of anticipated forfeitures. As of September 30, ~~2018,~~2019, there was no unrecognized compensation ~~cost of $2 related to nonvested stock will be recognized over a weighted-average period of 0.13 years.~~cost.

1516 - LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

In April 2015, six class action complaints were filed in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York. On May 26, 2015, the six actions were consolidated under the caption In Re Baltic Trading Ltd. Stockholder Litigation, Index No. 651241/2015, and a consolidated class action complaint was filed on June 10, 2015 (the “Consolidated Complaint”). The Consolidated Complaint is purported to be brought by and on behalf of Baltic Trading’s shareholders and alleges that the then-proposed July 2015 merger did not fairly compensate Baltic Trading’s shareholders and undervalued Baltic Trading. The Consolidated Complaint names as defendants the Company, Baltic Trading, the individual members of Baltic Trading’s board, and the Company’s merger subsidiary. The claims generally allege (i) breaches of fiduciary duties of good faith, due care, disclosure to shareholders, and loyalty, including for failing to maximize shareholder value, and (ii) aiding and abetting those breaches. Among other relief, the complaints seek an injunction against the merger, declaratory judgments that the individual defendants breached fiduciary duties, rescission of the merger agreement, and unspecified damages.

On July 9, 2015, plaintiffs in that action moved to enjoin the merger vote, scheduled to take place on July 17, 2015. The motion to enjoin the vote was denied on July 15, 2015. Plaintiffs sought an emergency injunction and temporary restraining order from the New York State Appellate Division, First Department the following day, on July 16, 2015. The Appellate Division denied the request, and the vote, and subsequent merger, proceeded as scheduled on July 17, 2015. Plaintiffs thereafter withdrew that appeal.

On June 30, 2015, defendants had moved to dismiss the Consolidated Complaint in its entirety. Plaintiffs subsequently served an Amended Consolidated Complaint, and defendants directed their motion to dismiss to that amended complaint. The motion to dismiss was granted and the Amended Consolidated Complaint was dismissed with

~~Table of Contents~~

prejudice on August 29, 2016. By a Decision and Order dated April 26, 2018, the New York State Appellate Division, First Department affirmed the dismissal of the amended complaint. The time for plaintiffs to file a motion for leave to appeal to the New York State Court of Appeals has expired.

From time to time, the Company may be subject to legal proceedings and claims in the ordinary course of its business, principally personal injury and property casualty claims. Such claims, even if lacking merit, could result in the expenditure of significant financial and managerial resources. The Company is not aware of any legal proceedings or

Table of Contents

claims that it believes will have, individually or in the aggregate, a material effect on the Company, its financial condition, results of operations or cash flows besides those noted above.

1617 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

On ~~October 24, 2018,~~November 5, 2019, the Company entered into amendments with our lenders to the dividend covenants of the credit agreements for our $495 Million Credit Facility and our $108 Million Credit Facility. Under the terms of these two facilities as so amended, dividends or repurchases of our stock are subject to customary conditions. The Company may pay dividends or repurchase stock under these facilities to the extent our total cash and cash equivalents are greater than $100,000 and 18.75% of our total indebtedness, whichever is higher; if we cannot satisfy this condition, we are subject to a limitation of 50% of consolidated net income for the quarter preceding such dividend payment or stock repurchase if the collateral maintenance test ratio is 200% or less for such quarter, for which purpose the full commitment of up to $35,000 of the scrubber tranche under the $495 Million Credit Facility is assumed to be drawn.

On November 5, 2019, the Company declared a regular quarterly dividend of $0.175 per share to be paid on or about December 5, 2019 to shareholders of record as of November 21, 2019. The aggregate amount of the dividend is expected to be approximately $7,351, which the Company anticipates will be funded from cash on hand at the time the payment is to be made.

On November 5, 2019, the Company declared a special dividend of $0.325 per share to be paid on or about December 5, 2019 to shareholders of record as of November 21, 2019. The aggregate amount of the dividend is expected to be approximately $13,652, which the Company anticipates will be funded from cash on hand at the time the payment is to be made.

On November 4, 2019, the Company entered into an agreement to sell the Genco ~~Muse,~~Raptor, a ~~2001-built Handymax~~2007-built Panamax vessel, to a third party for $10,200 less a 2.0% commission payable to a third party. The sale of the vessel is expected to be completed during the fourth quarter of ~~2018. This~~2019. Refer to Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies regarding the impairment recorded for this vessel ~~does not serve as collateral under any~~during the third quarter of ~~the Company’s credit facilities; therefore the Company will not be required to pay down any indebtedness with the proceeds from the sale.~~ 2019.

On October ~~16, 2018,~~21, 2019, the Company completed the sale of the Genco ~~Cavalier,~~Champion, a ~~2007-built Supramax~~2006-built Handysize vessel, to a third party for ~~$10,000~~$6,600 less a ~~2.5%~~3.0% broker commission payable to a third party. The vessel assets have been classified as held for sale in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of September 30, ~~2018.~~2019. Refer also to Note 4 — Vessel Acquisitions and Dispositions. This vessel served as collateral under the ~~$460~~$495 Million Credit Facility; therefore, ~~$4,947~~$4,101 of the net proceeds received from the sale will remain classified as restricted cash for ~~120~~180 days following the sale date. That amount can be used towards a loan prepayment under the facility or for the financing of a replacement vessel or vessels meeting certain requirements and added as collateral under the facility. If such a replacement vessel is not added as collateral within such ~~120~~180 day period, the Company will be required to use the proceeds as a loan prepayment.

~~Based on vessel sales committed to date,~~On October 10, 2019, the Company ~~expects to record a net gain on~~completed the sale of the Genco ~~Explorer (see~~Challenger, a 2003-built Handysize vessel, to a third party for $5,250 less a 2.0% broker commission payable to a third party. The vessel assets have been classified as held for sale in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of September 30, 2019. Refer also to Note 4 — Vessel Acquisitions and ~~Dispositions), Genco Muse and Genco Cavalier during~~Dispositions. This vessel served as collateral under the ~~fourth quarter of 2018 of approximately $1.2 million, excluding any expenses incurred as part~~$495 Million Credit Facility; therefore, $3,381 of the ~~sales.~~net proceeds received from the sale will remain classified as restricted cash for 180 days following the sale date. That amount can be used towards a loan prepayment under the facility or for the financing of a replacement vessel or vessels meeting certain requirements and added as collateral under the facility. If such a replacement vessel is not added as collateral within such 180 day

period, the Company will be required to use the proceeds as a loan prepayment.

3735

Table of Contents

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

"Safe Harbor" Statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995

This report contains forward-looking statements made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements use words such as “anticipate,” “estimate,” “expect,” “project,” “intend,” “plan,” “believe,” and other words and terms of similar meaning in connection with a discussion of potential future events, circumstances or future operating or financial performance. These forward-looking statements are based on our management’s current expectations and observations. Included among the factors that, in our view, could cause actual results to differ materially from the forward looking statements contained in this report are the following: (i) declines or sustained weakness in demand in the drybulk shipping industry; (ii) continuation of weakness or declines in drybulk shipping rates; (iii) changes in the supply of or demand for drybulk products, generally or in particular regions; (iv) changes in the supply of drybulk carriers including newbuilding of vessels or lower than anticipated scrapping of older vessels; (v) changes in rules and regulations applicable to the cargo industry, including, without limitation, legislation adopted by international organizations or by individual countries and actions taken by regulatory authorities; (vi) increases in costs and expenses including but not limited to: crew wages, insurance, provisions, lube oil, bunkers, repairs, maintenance, general and administrative expenses, and management fee expenses; (vii) whether our insurance arrangements are adequate; (viii) changes in general domestic and international political conditions; (ix) acts of war, terrorism, or piracy; (x) changes in the condition of the Company’s vessels or applicable maintenance or regulatory standards (which may affect, among other things, our anticipated drydocking or maintenance and repair costs) and unanticipated drydock expenditures; (xi) the Company’s acquisition or disposition of vessels; (xii) the amount of offhire time needed to complete maintenance, repairs, and installation of equipment to comply with applicable regulations on vessels and the timing and amount of any reimbursement by our insurance carriers for insurance claims, including offhire days; (xiii) the completion of definitive documentation with respect to charters; (xiv) charterers’ compliance with the terms of their charters in the current market environment; (xv) the extent to which our operating results continue to be affected by weakness in market conditions and freight and charter rates; (xvi) our ability to maintain contracts that are critical to our operation, to obtain and maintain acceptable terms with our vendors, customers and service providers and to retain key executives, managers and employees; (xvii) completion of documentation for vessel transactions and the performance of the terms thereof by buyers or sellers of vessels and us; (xviii) the terms of definitive documentation for the purchase and installation of exhaust gas cleaning systems, or scrubbers, for our vessels and our ability to have scrubbers installed within the price range and time frame anticipated; (xix) our ability to obtain any additional financing for scrubbers on acceptable terms; (xx) the relative cost and availability of low sulfur and high sulfur ~~fuel;~~fuel or any additional scrubbers we may seek to install; (xxi) our ability to realize the economic benefits or recover the cost of the scrubbers we plan to install; (xxii) worldwide compliance with sulfur emissions regulations due to take effect on January 1, 2020; (xxiii) our financial results the year ending December 31, 2019 and other factors relating to determination of the tax treatment of the recently declared special dividend and quarterly dividend; and other factors listed from time to time in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including, without limitation, our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2017~~2018 and subsequent reports on Form 8-K and Form 10-Q.

The following management’s discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our historical consolidated financial statements and the related notes included in this Form 10-Q.

General

We are a Marshall Islands company that transports iron ore, coal, grain, steel products and other drybulk cargoes along worldwide shipping routes through the ownership and operation of drybulk carrier vessels. ~~After giving effect to the sale~~Our fleet currently consists of ~~one Handymax and one Handysize vessel as described below, our fleet will consist of 61~~56 drybulk vessels, including 17 Capesize drybulk carriers, ~~five~~two Panamax drybulk carriers, six Ultramax drybulk carriers, 20 Supramax drybulk carriers and 1311 Handysize drybulk carriers, with an aggregate carrying capacity of approximately ~~5,297,000~~5,018,000 dwt and an average age of approximately ~~9.3~~9.6 years. We seek to deploy our vessels on time charters, spot market voyage charters, spot market-related time charters or in vessel pools trading in the spot market, to reputable charterers. The majority of the vessels in our current fleet are presently engaged under time charter,

Table of Contents

spot market voyage charters and spot market-related time charter contracts that expire (assuming the option periods in the time charters are not exercised) between November ~~2018~~2019 and ~~June 2019.~~April 2020.

See pages 4745 - 5146 for a table of all vessels in our fleet.

~~Table of Contents~~

In 2017, we began implementing ~~certain~~ initiatives to expand our commercial platform and more actively manage the employment of our vessels. We hired commercial directors for our major bulk and minor bulk fleets and began employment of our vessels directly with cargo owners under cargo contracts. To better capitalize on opportunities to employ our vessels, ~~in markets around the world,~~ we expanded our global commercial presence with the establishment of new offices in Singapore and ~~Denmark.~~Copenhagen. Additionally, we ~~have withdrawn~~withdrew all of our vessels from their respective pools and ~~are reallocating~~reallocated our freight exposure to the Atlantic basin to seek to capture the earnings premium historically offered. Overall, our fleet deployment strategy remains weighted towards short-term fixtures, which provide optionality in a potentially rising freight rate environment. In addition to both short and long-term time charters, we fix our vessels on spot market voyage charters as well as spot market-related time charters depending on market conditions and management’s outlook.

On July 12, 2018, we entered into agreements to purchase two modern, high specification Capesize drybulk vessels for an aggregate purchase price of $98.0 million. These vessels were renamed the Genco Defender and the Genco Liberty (both 2016-built Capesize vessels) and were delivered during the third quarter of 2018. We utilized a combination of cash on hand and proceeds from the $108 Million Credit Facility as described in Note 7 — ~~Debt in our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.~~

On June 6, 2018, we entered into an agreement for the en bloc purchase of four drybulk vessels including two Capesize drybulk vessels and two Ultramax drybulk vessels for approximately $141.0 million. Each vessel was built with a fuel-saving “eco” engine. These vessels were renamed the Genco Weatherly (2014-built Ultramax vessel), Genco Columbia (2016-built Ultramax vessel), Genco Endeavour (2015-built Capesize vessel) and Genco Resolute (2015-built Capesize vessel) and were delivered during the third quarter of 2018. The Company utilized a combination of cash on hand and proceeds from the $108 Million Credit Facility as described in Note 7 — ~~Debt in our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.~~

On August 30, 2018, we entered into an agreement to sell the Genco Cavalier, a 2007-built Supramax vessel, and the vessel assets have been classified as held for sale in our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of September 30, 2018. The sale was completed on October 16, 2018. The Genco Cavalier served as collateral under the $460 Million ~~Credit Facility; therefore, $4.9 million of the net proceeds received from the sale will remain classified as restricted cash~~ for 120 days following the sale date. That amount can be used towards the financing of a replacement vessel or vessels meeting certain requirements and added as collateral under the facility. If such a replacement vessel is not added as collateral, we will be required to use the proceeds as a loan prepayment.

~~On July 24, 2018, we entered into an agreement to sell the Genco Surprise, a 1998-built Panamax vessel. On August 7, 2018, the Company completed the sale of the Genco Surprise. This vessel does not serve as collateral under~~ ~~any of our credit facilities; therefore, we are not required to pay down any indebtedness with the proceeds from the sale.~~

~~On June~~ 27, 2018, we reached agreements to sell the Genco Explorer and Genco Progress, both 1999-built Handysize vessels. The sale of the Genco Progress was completed on September 13, 2018, and the sale of the Genco Explorer is expected to be completed during the fourth quarter of 2018. The vessel assets for the Genco Explorer have been classified as held for sale in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of September 30, 2018. These vessels do not serve as collateral under any of our credit facilities; therefore, we are not required to pay down any indebtedness with the proceeds from the sales. The sales are subject to completion of definitive documentation and customary conditions.

The Genco Cavalier, the Genco Surprise, the Genco Explorer and Genco Progress are part of our previously announced fleet renewal program. We therefore intend to redeploy the net proceeds from the sales of these vessels towards the acquisition of replacement vessels.

We report financial information and evaluate our operations by charter revenues and not by the length of ship employment for our customers, i.e., spot or time charters. Each of our vessels serves the same type of customer, has similar operations and maintenance requirements, operates in the same regulatory environment, and is subject to similar economic characteristics. Based on this, we have determined that we operate in one reportable segment in which we are engaged in the ocean transportation of drybulk cargoes worldwide through the ownership and operation of drybulk carrier vessels.

~~Table of Contents~~

Our management team and our other employees are responsible for the commercial and strategic management of our fleet. Commercial management includes the negotiation of charters for vessels, managing the mix of various types of charters, such as time charters, spot market voyage charters and spot market-related time charters, and monitoring the performance of our vessels under their charters. Strategic management includes locating, purchasing, financing and selling vessels. We currently contract with two independent technical managers to provide technical management of our fleet at a lower cost than we believe would be possible in-house. Technical management involves the day-to-day management of vessels, including performing routine maintenance, attending to vessel operations and arranging for crews and supplies. Members of our New York City-based management team oversee the activities of our independent technical managers.

Over the course of 2018, the United States ~~has~~ imposed a series of tariffs on several goods imported from various countries. Certain of these countries, including China, ~~have undertaken~~undertook retaliatory actions ~~with the implementation of~~by implementing tariffs on select U.S. products. Most notably in terms of drybulk trade volumes is China’s tariff placed upon U.S. soybean ~~exports.~~exports, which could adversely affect drybulk rates. To date, our observation of trade flows has been that China has increased its market share of Brazilian and Argentine soybeans, while a portion of U.S. shipments have been re-directed to other destinations such as Latin America and Europe.As of the date of this filing, there is still no comprehensive trade agreement in place between China and the U.S., although reports indicate a phase-one deal is close to being executed between the two countries. It has reported that under this framework, China is to agree to purchase U.S. agricultural products including soybeans. However, as no agreement has been finalized, the risk of trade tensions reigniting between the two nations and further escalation of tariffs and other economic measures remains.

On October 27, 2016, ~~at the 70~~th ~~session of~~ the Marine Environment Protection Committee (“MEPC”)~~, the MEPC~~ announced the ~~results from a vote to ratify and formalize~~ratification of regulations mandating a reduction in sulfur emissions from 3.5% currently to 0.5% as of the beginning of 2020 rather than pushing the deadline back to 2025. By 2020, ships will now have to reduce sulfur emissions, for which the principal solutions are the use of exhaust gas cleaning systems (“scrubbers”) or buying fuel with low sulfur content. If a vessel is not retrofitted with a scrubber, it will need to use low sulfur fuel, which is currently more expensive than standard marine fuel containing 3.5% sulfur content. This increased demand for low sulfur fuel may result in an increase in prices for such fuel.

We ~~plan~~have entered into agreements to install scrubbers on our 17 Capesize ~~vessels with options for installation on an additional 15 minor bulk~~ vessels. We expect the balance of our fleet will consume compliant, low sulfur fuel beginning in 2020 but ~~will~~intend to continue to evaluate other options. ~~We also plan to continue to sell~~During the course of 2018, we sold seven of our older, less ~~fuel-efficient~~fuel efficient vessels and ~~redeploy sale proceeds towards~~purchased six modern ~~fuel-efficient~~high specification vessels towith a goal of improving fuel consumption and further reduce emissions. We also sold one vessel during January 2019 and two vessels during October 2019, and also entered into an agreement on September 25, 2019 and November 4, 2019 to sell two additional vessels. We will continue to seek opportunities to renew our fleet going forward.

On January 1, 2019, we adopted Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 842 — Leases which resulted in a right-of-use and operating lease liability for our office lease in New York. Refer to Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Note 13 — Leases of our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.

Table of Contents

of charters, such as time charters, spot market voyage charters and spot market-related time charters, and monitoring the performance of our vessels under their charters. Strategic management includes locating, purchasing, financing and selling vessels. We currently contract with two independent technical managers to provide technical management of our fleet at a lower cost than we believe would be possible in-house. Technical management involves the day-to-day management of vessels, including performing routine maintenance, attending to vessel operations and arranging for crews and supplies. Members of our New York City-based management team oversee the activities of our independent technical managers.

Factors Affecting Our Results of Operations

We believe that the following table reflects important measures for analyzing trends in our results of operations. The table reflects our ownership days, chartered-in days, available days, operating days, fleet utilization, TCE rates and daily vessel operating expenses for the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017~~2018 on a consolidated basis.


	For the Three Months Ended								For the Three Months Ended
	September 30,				Increase				September 30,				Increase
	2018		2017		(Decrease)		% Change		2019		2018		(Decrease)		% Change
Fleet Data:
Ownership days (1)
Capesize		1,334.5		1,196.0		138.5	11.6	%		1,564.0		1,334.5		229.5	17.2	%
Panamax		497.1		552.0		(54.9)	(9.9)	%		184.0		497.1		(313.1)	(63.0)	%
Ultramax		455.2		368.0		87.2	23.7	%		552.0		455.2		96.8	21.3	%
Supramax		1,932.0		1,932.0		—	—	%		1,840.0		1,932.0		(92.0)	(4.8)	%
Handymax		92.0		92.0		—	—	%		—		92.0		(92.0)	(100.0)	%
Handysize		1,362.1		1,380.0		(17.9)	(1.3)	%		1,196.0		1,362.1		(166.1)	(12.2)	%

Total		5,673.0		5,520.0		153.0	2.8	%		5,336.0		5,673.0		(337.0)	(5.9)	%

Chartered-in days (2)
Capesize										103.5		—		103.5	100.0	%
Panamax										—		—		—	—	%
Ultramax										—		—		—	—	%
Supramax										247.5		—		247.5	100.0	%
Handymax										—		37.0		(37.0)	(100.0)	%
Handysize										79.2		27.6		51.6	187.0	%

Total										430.2		64.5		365.6	566.8	%

Available days (owned & chartered-in fleet) (3)
Capesize										1,220.2		1,288.0		(67.8)	(5.3)	%
Panamax										183.7		496.1		(312.4)	(63.0)	%
Ultramax										532.9		448.8		84.1	18.7	%
Supramax										1,955.1		1,928.6		26.5	1.4	%
Handymax										—		129.0		(129.0)	(100.0)	%
Handysize										1,273.1		1,389.5		(116.4)	(8.4)	%

Total										5,165.0		5,680.0		(515.0)	(9.1)	%

Available days (owned fleet) (4)
Capesize										1,116.7		1,288.0		(171.3)	(13.3)	%
Panamax										183.7		496.1		(312.4)	(63.0)	%
Ultramax										532.9		448.8		84.1	18.7	%
Supramax										1,707.6		1,928.6		(221.0)	(11.5)	%
Handymax										—		92.0		(92.0)	(100.0)	%
Handysize										1,193.9		1,361.9		(168.0)	(12.3)	%

Total										4,734.8		5,615.4		(880.6)	(15.7)	%

4038

Table of Contents


	For the Three Months Ended											For the Three Months Ended
	September 30,						Increase					September 30,						Increase
	2018			2017			(Decrease)			% Change
Chartered-in days (2)
Capesize		—			—			—		—	%
Panamax		—			—			—		—	%
Ultramax		—			—			—		—	%
Supramax		—			—			—		—	%
Handymax		37.0			—			37.0		100.0	%
Handysize		27.6			—			27.6		100.0	%

Total		64.5			—			64.5		100.0	%

Available days (owned & chartered-in fleet) (3)
Capesize		1,288.0			1,195.7			92.3		7.7	%
Panamax		496.1			501.9			(5.8)		(1.1)	%
Ultramax		448.8			365.9			82.9		22.6	%
Supramax		1,928.6			1,864.2			64.4		3.5	%
Handymax		129.0			91.2			37.8		41.4	%
Handysize		1,389.5			1,380.0			9.5		0.7	%

Total		5,680.0			5,399.0			281.0		5.2	%

Available days (owned fleet) (4)
Capesize		1,288.0			1,195.7			92.3		7.7	%
Panamax		496.1			501.9			(5.8)		(1.1)	%
Ultramax		448.8			365.9			82.9		22.6	%
Supramax		1,928.6			1,864.2			64.4		3.5	%
Handymax		92.0			91.2			0.8		0.9	%
Handysize		1,361.9			1,380.0			(18.1)		(1.3)	%

Total		5,615.4			5,399.0			216.5		4.0	%
												2019			2018			(Decrease)			% Change
Operating days (5)
Capesize		1,286.1			1,162.4			123.7		10.6	%		1,213.5			1,286.1			(72.6)		(5.6)	%
Panamax		472.0			501.5			(29.5)		(5.9)	%		183.7			472.0			(288.3)		(61.1)	%
Ultramax		445.4			365.9			79.4		21.7	%		530.9			445.4			85.5		19.2	%
Supramax		1,911.5			1,841.9			69.6		3.8	%		1,940.5			1,911.5			29.0		1.5	%
Handymax		124.0			87.4			36.7		41.9	%		—			124.0			(124.0)		(100.0)	%
Handysize		1,383.9			1,349.1			34.8		2.6	%		1,261.2			1,383.9			(122.7)		(8.9)	%

Total		5,622.8			5,308.1			314.7		5.9	%		5,129.8			5,622.8			(493.0)		(8.8)	%

Fleet utilization (6)
Capesize		98.5	%		97.2	%		1.3	%	1.3	%		98.3	%		98.5	%		(0.2)	%	(0.2)	%
Panamax		94.9	%		99.8	%		(4.9)	%	(4.9)	%		99.9	%		94.9	%		5.0	%	5.3	%
Ultramax		97.8	%		99.4	%		(1.6)	%	(1.6)	%		99.6	%		97.8	%		1.8	%	1.8	%
Supramax		98.9	%		97.8	%		1.1	%	1.1	%		99.0	%		98.9	%		0.1	%	0.1	%
Handymax		96.2	%		95.0	%		1.2	%	1.3	%		—	%		96.2	%		(96.2)	%	(100.0)	%
Handysize		99.6	%		97.8	%		1.8	%	1.8	%		99.1	%		99.6	%		(0.5)	%	(0.5)	%

Fleet average		98.5	%		97.9	%		0.6	%	0.6	%		98.9	%		98.5	%		0.4	%	0.4	%


	For the Three Months Ended
	September 30,					Increase
	2019		2018			(Decrease)		% Change
Average Daily Results:
Time Charter Equivalent (7)
Capesize	$	16,311	$	15,168		$	1,143	7.5	%
Panamax		14,747		9,319			5,428	58.2	%
Ultramax		12,634		8,063			4,571	56.7	%
Supramax		9,989		10,014			(25)	(0.2)	%
Handymax		—		11,948	��		(11,948)	(100.0)	%
Handysize		8,945		8,719			226	2.6	%

Fleet average		11,687		10,696			991	9.3	%

Daily vessel operating expenses (8)
Capesize	$	5,174	$	5,172		$	2	0.0	%
Panamax		4,809		4,039			770	19.1	%
Ultramax		4,841		4,879			(38)	(0.8)	%
Supramax		4,550		4,246			304	7.2	%
Handymax		—		3,928			(3,928)	(100.0)	%
Handysize		3,920		4,008			(88)	(2.2)	%

Fleet average		4,631		4,434			197	4.4	%


	For the Nine Months Ended
	September 30,				Increase
	2019		2018		(Decrease)		% Change
Fleet Data:
Ownership days (1)
Capesize		4,641.0		3,687.5		953.5	25.9	%
Panamax		573.2		1,583.1		(1,009.9)	(63.8)	%
Ultramax		1,638.0		1,179.2		458.8	38.9	%
Supramax		5,460.0		5,733.0		(273.0)	(4.8)	%
Handymax		—		273.0		(273.0)	(100.0)	%
Handysize		3,549.0		4,077.1		(528.1)	(13.0)	%

Total		15,861.2		16,532.9		(671.7)	(4.1)	%

Table of Contents


	For the Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						Increase
	2019			2018			(Decrease)			% Change
Chartered-in days (2)
Capesize		182.9			—			182.9		100.0	%
Panamax		—			—			—		—	%
Ultramax		96.3			—			96.3		100.0	%
Supramax		529.3			49.4			479.9		971.5	%
Handymax		17.4			37.0			(19.6)		(53.0)	%
Handysize		244.8			27.6			217.2		787.0	%

Total		1,070.7			114.0			956.7		839.2	%

Available days (owned & chartered-in fleet) (3)
Capesize		4,258.9			3,608.0			650.9		18.0	%
Panamax		572.9			1,582.1			(1,009.2)		(63.8)	%
Ultramax		1,715.1			1,172.5			542.6		46.3	%
Supramax		5,686.2			5,775.4			(89.2)		(1.5)	%
Handymax		17.4			299.9			(282.5)		(94.2)	%
Handysize		3,733.9			4,067.5			(333.6)		(8.2)	%

Total		15,984.4			16,505.4			(521.0)		(3.2)	%

Available days (owned fleet) (4)
Capesize		4,076.0			3,608.0			468.0		13.0	%
Panamax		572.9			1,582.1			(1,009.2)		(63.8)	%
Ultramax		1,618.8			1,172.5			446.3		38.1	%
Supramax		5,156.9			5,726.0			(569.1)		(9.9)	%
Handymax		—			262.9			(262.9)		(100.0)	%
Handysize		3,489.1			4,039.9			(550.8)		(13.6)	%

Total		14,913.7			16,391.4			(1,477.7)		(9.0)	%

Operating days (5)
Capesize		4,219.0			3,606.0			613.0		17.0	%
Panamax		565.4			1,547.9			(982.5)		(63.5)	%
Ultramax		1,672.7			1,152.3			520.4		45.2	%
Supramax		5,609.5			5,707.3			(97.8)		(1.7)	%
Handymax		17.4			292.9			(275.5)		(94.1)	%
Handysize		3,652.9			4,011.8			(358.9)		(8.9)	%

Total		15,736.9			16,318.2			(581.3)		(3.6)	%

Fleet utilization (6)
Capesize		98.3	%		99.2	%		(0.9)	%	(0.9)	%
Panamax		98.6	%		97.8	%		0.8	%	0.8	%
Ultramax		97.5	%		97.7	%		(0.2)	%	(0.2)	%
Supramax		97.8	%		98.7	%		(0.9)	%	(0.9)	%
Handymax		—	%		94.5	%		(94.5)	%	(100.0)	%
Handysize		97.8	%		98.3	%		(0.5)	%	(0.5)	%

Fleet average		97.9	%		98.5	%		(0.6)	%	(0.6)	%

4140

Table of Contents


	For the Three Months Ended								For the Nine Months Ended
	September 30,				Increase				September 30,				Increase
	2018		2017		(Decrease)		% Change		2019		2018		(Decrease)		% Change
Average Daily Results:
Time Charter Equivalent (7)
Capesize	$	15,168	$	12,180	$	2,988	24.5	%	$	11,549	$	14,716	$	(3,167)	(21.5)	%
Panamax		9,319		9,329		(10)	(0.1)	%		10,935		9,513		1,422	14.9	%
Ultramax		8,063		8,509		(446)	(5.2)	%		10,298		9,930		368	3.7	%
Supramax		10,014		7,461		2,553	34.2	%		8,588		10,115		(1,527)	(15.1)	%
Handymax		11,948		7,665		4,283	55.9	%		—		10,965		(10,965)	(100.0)	%
Handysize		8,719		6,262		2,457	39.2	%		7,488		8,655		(1,167)	(13.5)	%

Fleet average		10,696		8,448		2,248	26.6	%		9,405		10,710		(1,305)	(12.2)	%

Daily vessel operating expenses (8)
Capesize	$	5,172	$	5,019	$	153	3.0	%	$	5,065	$	4,849	$	216	4.5	%
Panamax		4,039		4,391		(352)	(8.0)	%		4,538		4,149		389	9.4	%
Ultramax		4,879		4,592		287	6.3	%		4,628		4,518		110	2.4	%
Supramax		4,246		4,729		(483)	(10.2)	%		4,426		4,338		88	2.0	%
Handymax		3,928		4,102		(174)	(4.2)	%		—		5,012		(5,012)	(100.0)	%
Handysize		4,008		3,986		22	0.6	%		4,060		4,078		(18)	(0.4)	%

Fleet average		4,434		4,553		(119)	(2.6)	%		4,556		4,394		162	3.7	%

For the Nine Months Ended

September 30,

Increase


2018

2017

(Decrease)

% Change

Fleet Data:

Ownership days (1)

Capesize

3,687.5

3,549.0

138.5

3.9
%
Panamax

1,583.1

1,638.0

(54.9)

(3.4)
%
Ultramax

1,179.2

1,092.0

87.2

8.0
%
Supramax

5,733.0

5,733.0

—

—
%
Handymax

273.0

540.8

(267.8)

(49.5)
%
Handysize

4,077.1

4,134.6

(57.5)

(1.4)
%

Total

16,532.9

16,687.4

(154.5)

(0.9)
%

Chartered-in days (2)

Capesize

—

—

—

—
%
Panamax

—

—

—

—
%
Ultramax

—

—

—

—
%
Supramax

49.4

—

49.4

100.0
%
Handymax

37.0

—

37.0

100.0
%
Handysize

27.6

—

27.6

100.0
%

Total

114.0

—

114.0

100.0
%

Available days (owned & chartered-in fleet) (3)

Capesize

3,608.0

3,456.3

151.7

4.4
%
Panamax

1,582.1

1,468.6

113.5

7.7
%
Ultramax

1,172.5

1,087.7

84.8

7.8
%
Supramax

5,775.4

5,623.4

152.0

2.7
%
Handymax

299.9

518.3

(218.4)

(42.1)
%
Handysize

4,067.5

4,087.6

(20.1)

(0.5)
%

Total

16,505.4

16,241.9

263.5

1.6
%

~~Table of Contents~~

For the Nine Months Ended

September 30,

Increase


2018

2017

(Decrease)

% Change

Available days (owned fleet) (4)

Capesize

3,608.0

3,456.3

151.7

4.4
%
Panamax

1,582.1

1,468.6

113.5

7.7
%
Ultramax

1,172.5

1,087.7

84.8

7.8
%
Supramax

5,726.0

5,623.4

102.6

1.8
%
Handymax

262.9

518.3

(255.4)

(49.3)
%
Handysize

4,039.9

4,087.6

(47.7)

(1.2)
%

Total

16,391.4

16,241.9

149.5

0.9
%

Operating days (5)

Capesize

3,606.0

3,327.3

278.7

8.4
%
Panamax

1,547.9

1,461.8

86.1

5.9
%
Ultramax

1,152.3

1,083.7

68.6

6.3
%
Supramax

5,707.3

5,584.7

122.6

2.2
%
Handymax

292.9

494.2

(201.3)

(40.7)
%
Handysize

4,011.8

4,051.1

(39.3)

(1.0)
%

Total

16,318.2

16,002.8

315.4

2.0
%

Fleet utilization (6)

Capesize

99.2
%

95.3
%

3.9
%
4.1
%
Panamax

97.8
%

98.4
%

(0.6)
%
(0.6)
%
Ultramax

97.7
%

99.2
%

(1.5)
%
(1.5)
%
Supramax

98.7
%

98.7
%

—
%
—
%
Handymax

94.5
%

91.4
%

3.1
%
3.4
%
Handysize

98.3
%

99.0
%

(0.7)
%
(0.7)
%

Fleet average

98.5
%

97.8
%

0.7
%
0.7
%

For the Nine Months Ended

September 30,

Increase


2018

2017

(Decrease)

% Change

Average Daily Results:

Time Charter Equivalent (7)

Capesize

$
14,716

$
10,381

$
4,335

41.8
%
Panamax

9,513

7,410

2,103

28.4
%
Ultramax

9,930

8,172

1,758

21.5
%
Supramax

10,115

6,936

3,179

45.8
%
Handymax

10,965

7,309

3,656

50.0
%
Handysize

8,655

6,505

2,150

33.1
%

Fleet average

10,710

7,698

3,012

39.1
%

Daily vessel operating expenses (8)

Capesize

$
4,849

$
4,789

$
60

1.3
%
Panamax

4,149

4,493

(344)

(7.7)
%
Ultramax

4,518

4,462

56

1.3
%
Supramax

4,338

4,521

(183)

(4.0)
%
Handymax

5,012

4,240

772

18.2
%
Handysize

4,078

3,973

105

2.6
%

Fleet average

4,394

4,427

(33)

(0.7)
%

~~Table of Contents~~

Definitions

In order to understand our discussion of our results of operations, it is important to understand the meaning of the following terms used in our analysis and the factors that influence our results of operations.

(1) Ownership days. We define ownership days as the aggregate number of days in a period during which each vessel in our fleet has been owned by us. Ownership days are an indicator of the size of our fleet over a period and affect both the amount of revenues and the amount of expenses that we record during a period.

(2) Chartered-in days. We define chartered-in days as the aggregate number of days in a period during which we chartered-in third-party vessels.

(3) Available days (owned and chartered-in fleet). We define available days, which we have recently updated and incorporated in the table above to better demonstrate the manner in which we evaluate our business, as the number of our ownership days and chartered-in days less the aggregate number of days that our vessels are off-hire due to familiarization upon acquisition, repairs or repairs under guarantee, vessel upgrades or special surveys. ~~Amounts for available days in the table above for the periods ended September 30, 2017 have been adjusted for our updated method of calculating available days.~~ Companies in the shipping industry generally use available days to measure the number of days in a period during which vessels should be capable of generating revenues.

(4) Available days (owned fleet). We define available days for the owned fleet as available days less chartered-in days.

(5) Operating days. We define operating days as the number of our total available days in a period less the aggregate number of days that our vessels are off-hire due to unforeseen circumstances. The shipping industry uses operating days to measure the aggregate number of days in a period during which vessels actually generate revenues.~~Amounts for operating days in the table above for the periods ended September 30, 2017 have been adjusted for our updated method of calculating available days.~~

(6) Fleet utilization. We calculate fleet utilization, which we have recently updated and incorporated in the table above to better demonstrate the manner in which we evaluate our business, as the number of our operating days during a period divided by the number of ownership days plus chartered-in days less drydocking days. ~~Amounts for fleet utilization in the table above for the period ended September 30, 2017 have been adjusted for our updated method of calculating fleet utilization.~~

(7) TCE rates. We define TCE rates as our voyage revenues less voyage expenses and charter-hire expenses, divided by the number of the available days of our owned fleet during the period, which is consistent with industry standards. TCE rate is a common shipping industry performance measure used primarily to compare daily earnings generated by vessels

Table of Contents

on time charters with daily earnings generated by vessels on voyage charters, because charterhire rates for vessels on voyage charters are generally not expressed in per-day amounts while charterhire rates for vessels on time charters generally are expressed in such amounts.


	For the Three Months Ended				For the Nine Months Ended				For the Three Months Ended				For the Nine Months Ended
	September 30,				September 30,				September 30,				September 30,
	2018		2017		2018		2017		2019		2018		2019		2018
Voyage revenues (in thousands)	$	92,263	$	51,161	$	255,336	$	134,780	$	103,776	$	92,263	$	280,790	$	255,336
Voyage expenses (in thousands)		31,475		5,550		78,551		9,743		42,967		31,475		127,789		78,551
Charter hire expenses (in thousands)		723		—		1,231		—		5,475		723		12,743		1,231
		60,065		45,611		175,554		125,037		55,334		60,065		140,258		175,554
Total available days for owned fleet		5,615.4		5,399.0		16,391.4		16,241.9		4,735		5,615		14,914		16,391
Total TCE rate	$	10,696	$	8,448	$	10,710	$	7,698	$	11,687	$	10,696	$	9,405	$	10,710

(8) Daily vessel operating expenses. We define daily vessel operating expenses to include crew wages and related costs, the cost of insurance expenses relating to repairs and maintenance (excluding drydocking), the costs of spares and consumable stores, tonnage taxes and other miscellaneous expenses. Daily vessel operating expenses are calculated by dividing vessel operating expenses by ownership days for the relevant period.

4442

Table of Contents

Operating Data

The following ~~tables represent~~table represents the operating data for the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017~~2018 on a consolidated basis.


	For the Three Months Ended								For the Three Months Ended
	September 30,								September 30,
	2018		2017		Change		% Change		2019		2018		Change		% Change
	(U.S. dollars in thousands, except for per share amounts)								(U.S. dollars in thousands, except for per share amounts)
Revenue:
Voyage revenues	$	92,263	$	51,161	$	41,102	80.3	%	$	103,776	$	92,263	$	11,513	12.5	%

Total revenues		92,263		51,161		41,102	80.3	%		103,776		92,263		11,513	12.5	%

Operating Expenses:
Voyage expenses		31,475		5,550		25,925	467.1	%		42,967		31,475		11,492	36.5	%
Vessel operating expenses		25,155		25,131		24	0.1	%		24,711		25,155		(444)	(1.8)	%
Charter hire expenses		723		—		723	100.0	%		5,475		723		4,752	657.3	%
General and administrative expenses (inclusive of nonvested stock amortization expense of $644 and $1,255, respectively)		5,033		5,889		(856)	(14.5)	%
General and administrative expenses (inclusive of nonvested stock amortization expense of $575 and $644, respectively)										6,144		5,033		1,111	22.1	%
Technical management fees		2,028		1,883		145	7.7	%		1,885		2,028		(143)	(7.1)	%
Depreciation and amortization		17,269		17,836		(567)	(3.2)	%		18,184		17,269		915	5.3	%
Impairment of vessel assets		—		18,654		(18,654)	(100.0)	%		12,182		—		12,182	100.0	%
Gain on sale of vessels		(1,509)		—		(1,509)	100.0	%		—		(1,509)		1,509	(100.0)	%

Total operating expenses		80,174		74,943		5,231	7.0	%		111,548		80,174		31,374	39.1	%

Operating income (loss)		12,089		(23,782)		35,871	(150.8)	%
Operating (loss) income										(7,772)		12,089		(19,861)	(164.3)	%
Other expense		(6,381)		(7,400)		1,019	(13.8)	%		(6,819)		(6,381)		(438)	6.9	%

Income (loss) before income taxes		5,708		(31,182)		36,890	(118.3)	%
Income tax expense		—		—		—	—
Net (loss) income									$	(14,591)	$	5,708	$	(20,299)	(355.6)	%

Net income (loss)	$	5,708	$	(31,182)	$	36,890	(118.3)	%

Net earnings (loss) per share - basic	$	0.14	$	(0.90)	$	1.04	(115.6)	%
Net earnings (loss) per share - diluted	$	0.14	$	(0.90)	$	1.04	(115.6)	%
Net (loss) earnings per share - basic									$	(0.35)	$	0.14	$	(0.49)	(350.0)	%
Net (loss) earnings per share - diluted									$	(0.35)	$	0.14	$	(0.49)	(350.0)	%
Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic		41,618,187		34,469,998		7,148,189	20.7	%		41,749,200		41,618,187		131,013	0.3	%
Weighted average common shares outstanding - diluted		41,821,008		34,469,998		7,351,010	21.3	%		41,749,200		41,821,008		(71,808)	(0.2)	%

EBITDA (1)	$	29,571	$	(5,983)	$	35,554	(594.3)	%	$	10,498	$	29,571	$	(19,073)	(64.5)	%

4543

Table of Contents


	For the Nine Months Ended								For the Nine Months Ended
	September 30,								September 30,
	2018		2017		Change		% Change		2019		2018		Change		% Change
	(U.S. dollars in thousands, except for per share amounts)								(U.S. dollars in thousands, except for per share amounts)
Revenue:
Voyage revenues	$	255,336	$	134,780	$	120,556	89.4	%	$	280,790	$	255,336	$	25,454	10.0	%

Total revenues		255,336		134,780		120,556	89.4	%		280,790		255,336		25,454	10.0	%

Operating Expenses:
Voyage expenses		78,551		9,743		68,808	706.2	%		127,789		78,551		49,238	62.7	%
Vessel operating expenses		72,642		73,867		(1,225)	(1.7)	%		72,260		72,642		(382)	(0.5)	%
Charter hire expenses		1,231		—		1,231	100.0	%		12,743		1,231		11,512	935.2	%
General and administrative expenses (inclusive of nonvested stock amortization expense of $1,776 and $3,536, respectively)		16,761		16,550		211	1.3	%
General and administrative expenses (inclusive of nonvested stock amortization expense of $1,596 and $1,776, respectively)										18,253		16,761		1,492	8.9	%
Technical management fees		5,926		5,735		191	3.3	%		5,710		5,926		(216)	(3.6)	%
Depreciation and amortization		50,605		54,194		(3,589)	(6.6)	%		54,532		50,605		3,927	7.8	%
Impairment of vessel assets		56,586		21,993		34,593	157.3	%		26,078		56,586		(30,508)	(53.9)	%
Gain on sale of vessels		(1,509)		(7,712)		6,203	(80.4)	%		(611)		(1,509)		898	(59.5)	%

Total operating expenses		280,793		174,370		106,423	61.0	%		316,754		280,793		35,961	12.8	%

Operating loss		(25,457)		(39,590)		14,133	(35.7)	%		(35,964)		(25,457)		(10,507)	41.3	%
Other expense		(25,767)		(21,705)		(4,062)	18.7	%		(20,904)		(25,767)		4,863	(18.9)	%

Loss before income taxes		(51,224)		(61,295)		10,071	(16.4)	%
Income tax expense		—		—		—	—	%

Net loss	$	(51,224)	$	(61,295)	$	10,071	(16.4)	%	$	(56,868)	$	(51,224)	$	(5,644)	11.0	%

Net loss per share - basic	$	(1.37)	$	(1.80)		0.43	(23.9)	%	$	(1.36)	$	(1.37)		0.01	(0.7)	%
Net loss per share - diluted	$	(1.37)	$	(1.80)		0.43	(23.9)	%	$	(1.36)	$	(1.37)		0.01	(0.7)	%
Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic		37,263,200		34,135,736		3,127,464	9.2	%		41,739,287		37,263,200		4,476,087	12.0	%
Weighted average common shares outstanding - diluted		37,263,200		34,135,736		3,127,464	9.2	%		41,739,287		37,263,200		4,476,087	12.0	%

EBITDA (1)	$	20,887	$	14,452	$	6,435	44.5	%	$	18,868	$	20,887	$	(2,019)	(9.7)	%

4644

Table of Contents

(1)

EBITDA represents net (loss) income plus net interest expense, taxes and depreciation and amortization. EBITDA is included because it is used by management and certain investors as a measure of operating performance. EBITDA is used by analysts in the shipping industry as a common performance measure to compare results across peers. Our management uses EBITDA as a performance measure in our consolidated internal financial statements, and it is presented for review at our board meetings. We believe that EBITDA is useful to investors as the shipping industry is capital intensive which often results in significant depreciation and cost of financing. EBITDA presents investors with a measure in addition to net income to evaluate our performance prior to these costs. EBITDA is not an item recognized by U.S. GAAP (i.e., non-GAAP measure) and should not be considered as an alternative to net income, operating income or any other indicator of a company’s operating performance required by U.S. GAAP. EBITDA is not a measure of liquidity or cash flows as shown in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. The definition of EBITDA used here may not be comparable to that used by other companies. The following table demonstrates our calculation of EBITDA and provides a reconciliation of EBITDA to net (loss) income for each of the periods presented above:


	For the Three Months Ended				For the Nine Months Ended				For the Three Months Ended				For the Nine Months Ended
	September 30,				September 30,				September 30,				September 30,
	2018		2017		2018		2017		2019		2018		2019		2018
Net income (loss)	$	5,708	$	(31,182)	$	(51,224)	$	(61,295)
Net (loss) income									$	(14,591)	$	5,708	$	(56,868)	$	(51,224)
Net interest expense		6,594		7,363		21,506		21,553		6,905		6,594		21,204		21,506
Income tax expense		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Depreciation and amortization		17,269		17,836		50,605		54,194		18,184		17,269		54,532		50,605

EBITDA (1)	$	29,571	$	(5,983)	$	20,887	$	14,452	$	10,498	$	29,571	$	18,868	$	20,887

Results of Operations

The following tables set forth information about the current employment of the vessels in our fleet as of November ~~6, 2018:~~5, 2019:

Year

Charter

Year

Charter

Vessel

Built

Charterer

Expiration(1)

Cash Daily Rate(2)

Built

Expiration(1)

Cash Daily Rate(2)

Capesize Vessels

Genco Augustus

2007

Daiichi Chuo Kisen Kaisha

December 2018

$23,900

(3)

2007

September 2019

Voyage

Genco Tiberius

2007

Pan Ocean Co., Ltd.

November 2018

$24,000

(4)

2007

September 2019

Voyage

Genco London

2007

Minmetals Logistics Zhejang Co. Ltd.

December 2018

$19,500

(5)

2007

October 2019

Voyage

Genco Titus

2007

Vale International S.A.

November 2018

Voyage

2007

November 2019

$20,500

Genco Constantine

2008

Pan Ocean Co., Ltd.

November 2018

$21,200

(6)

2008

November 2019

Voyage

Genco Hadrian

2008

Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha

January 2019

Voyage

2008

December 2019

Voyage

Genco Commodus

2009

Trafigura Maritime Logistics Pte. Ltd./Rio Tinto Shipping (Asia) Pte. Ltd.

November/
December 2018

Voyage

2009

January 2020

Voyage

Genco Maximus

2009

Vale International S.A.

December 2018

Voyage

2009

December 2019

Voyage

Genco Claudius

2010

Pacific Bulk Cape Company Ltd.

December 2018

$15,300

(7)

2010

November 2019

Voyage

Genco Tiger

2011

Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd.

November 2018

102.5% of BCI

(8)

2011

November 2019

$16,000

Baltic Lion

2012

Pacific Bulk Cape Company Ltd.

November 2018

$5,000

(9)

2012

December 2019

Voyage

Baltic Bear

2010

Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha

November 2018

Voyage

2010

November 2019

Voyage

Baltic Wolf

2010

Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha

January 2019

$23,500

(10)

2010

November 2019

Voyage

Genco Resolute

2015

Oldendorff Carriers GmbH & Co. KG

November 2018

Voyage

2015

December 2019

Voyage

Genco Endeavour

2015

EZDK

November 2018

Voyage

2015

November 2019

Voyage

Genco Defender

2016

Polaris Shipping

December 2018

Voyage

2016

December 2019

Voyage

Genco Liberty

2016

EZDK

November 2018

Voyage

2016

November 2019

Voyage

Panamax Vessels

Genco Beauty

1999

Rainbow Success Ltd.

November 2018

$9,250

(11)

Genco Knight

1999

Grand Fortune Marine Ltd.

November 2018

$11,250

(12)

Genco Vigour

1999

Sinocean Shipping Co. Ltd.

November 2018

$9,250

(13)

Genco Raptor

2007

United Bulk Carriers International S.A.

June 2019

96% of BPI

(14)

2007

November 2019

95.5% of BPI

Genco Thunder

2007

November 2019

$13,000

4745

Table of Contents

Year

Charter

Year

Charter

Vessel

Built

Charterer

Expiration(1)

Cash Daily Rate(2)

Built

Expiration(1)

Cash Daily Rate(2)

Genco Thunder

2007

Nordic Bulk Carriers A/S

November 2018

$14,750

(15)

Ultramax Vessels

Baltic Hornet

2014

Andirovithos Shipping Ltd.

November 2018

Voyage

2014

December 2019

$12,250

Baltic Wasp

2015

Pioneer Navigation Ltd.

November 2018

$11,000

2015

November 2019

Voyage

Baltic Scorpion

2015

Cargill International S.A.

December 2018

$9,500

(16)

2015

January 2020

Voyage

Baltic Mantis

2015

D/S Norden

November 2018

$12,000

(17)

2015

November 2019

Voyage

Genco Weatherly

2014

Cargill International S.A.

November 2018

$21,000

(18)

2014

November 2019

$12,000

Genco Columbia

2016

Canpotex Shipping Services

November 2018

$5,000

(19)

2016

December 2019

$20,000

Supramax Vessels

Genco Predator

2005

Dead Sea Works

November 2018

Voyage

2005

December 2019

Voyage

Genco Warrior

2005

Rudolph A. Oetker A/S & Co. KG

December 2018

$9,995

(20)

2005

November 2019

$7,000

Genco Hunter

2007

Olam International Ltd.

November 2018

Voyage

2007

November 2019

Voyage

Genco Lorraine

2009

Pan Ocean Co., Ltd.

November 2018

$13,000

(21)

2009

December 2019

$12,000

Genco Loire

2009

CCCC-Int Shipping Corp.

February 2019

$15,100

(22)

2009

November 2019

$10,750

Genco Aquitaine

2009

Brampton Shipping S.A.

November 2018

Voyage

2009

December 2019

$8,000

Genco Ardennes

2009

Cargill International S.A.

November 2018

Voyage

2009

December 2019

$5,500

Genco Auvergne

2009

Camden Iron and Metal

December 2018

Voyage

2009

December 2019

$10,500

Genco Bourgogne

2010

Bunge S.A. GVA

November 2018

$19,250

(23)

2010

November 2019

$19,000

Genco Brittany

2010

Canpotex Shipping Services

January 2019

$11,000

(24)

2010

November 2019

$9,750

Genco Languedoc

2010

Louis Dreyfus Company Suisse S.A.

December 2018

$21,000

(25)

2010

December 2019

Voyage

Genco Normandy

2007

Gavilon Fertilizers LLC

December 2018

Voyage

2007

November 2019

Voyage

Genco Picardy

2005

PCL Shipping Pte. Ltd.

November 2018

$14,075

(26)

2005

November 2019

$15,000

Genco Provence

2004

Western Bulk Pte. Ltd.

February 2019

$13,500

(27)

2004

December 2019

$12,000

Genco Pyrenees

2010

Cargill International S.A.

November 2018

$16,000

(28)

2010

December 2019

Voyage

Genco Rhone

2011

Arcelormittal

November 2018

Voyage

2011

November 2019

$15,000

Baltic Leopard

2009

Olam International Ltd.

December 2018

Voyage

2009

November 2019

Voyage

Baltic Panther

2009

Elim Spring Maritime

December 2018

$8,000

(29)

2009

March 2020

$11,250

Baltic Jaguar

2009

Cargill International S.A.

November 2018

$12,750

(30)

2009

November 2019

Voyage

Baltic Cougar

2009

Western Bulk Pte. Ltd.

December 2018

$10,500

(31)

2009

December 2019

Voyage

Handymax Vessels

Genco Muse

2001

Carbones Holding GmbH

November 2018

Voyage

Handysize Vessels

Genco Explorer

1999

Sucres et Denrees, Paris

November 2018

Voyage

Baltic Hare

2009

Olam International Ltd.

November 2018

Voyage

2009

November 2019

$27,500

Baltic Fox

2010

Raffles Shipping International Pte. Ltd.

December 2018

Voyage

2010

November 2019

Voyage

Genco Charger

2005

Denofa

November 2018

Voyage

2005

November 2019

Voyage

Genco Challenger

2003

D.J. Joseph Co.

November 2018

Voyage

Genco Champion

2006

Gavilon Grain

November 2018

Voyage

Baltic Wind

2009

Cargill International S.A.

November 2018

$9,750

(32)

2009

November 2019

Voyage

Baltic Cove

2010

Louis Dreyfus Company Freight Asia Pte. Ltd.

December 2018

Voyage

2010

November 2019

Voyage

Baltic Breeze

2010

Mat Metals Trade DMCC

November 2018

Voyage

2010

December 2019

Voyage

Genco Ocean

2010

Olam International Ltd.

November 2018

Voyage

2010

November 2019

Voyage

Genco Bay

2010

Dachex Shipping Pte. Ltd.

December 2018

Voyage

2010

November 2019

Voyage

Genco Avra

2011

Trafigura Maritime Logistics Pte. Ltd.

November 2018

$11,250

(33)

2011

November 2019

$5,500

Genco Mare

2011

Transammonia

November 2018

Voyage

2011

March 2020

$10,500

Genco Spirit

2011

EDC Trading LLC

January 2019

Voyage

2011

April 2020

$10,500

(1)

The charter expiration dates presented represent the earliest dates that our charters may be terminated in the ordinary course. Under the terms of certain contracts, the charterer is entitled to extend the time charter from two to four months in order to complete the vessel's final voyage plus any time the vessel has been off-hire.

~~Table of Contents~~

(2)

Time charter rates presented are the gross daily charterhire rates before third-party brokerage commission generally ranging from 1.25% to 6.25%. In a time charter, the charterer is responsible for voyage expenses such as bunkers, port expenses, agents’ fees and canal dues.

~~(3)~~

We have reached an agreement with Daiichi Chuo Kisen Kaisha on a time charter for approximately 80 days at a rate of $23,900 per day. Hire is paid every 15 days in advance less a 5.00% third-party brokerage commission. The vessel delivered to charterers on October 5, 2018.

~~(4)~~

We have reached an agreement with Pan Ocean Co., Ltd. on a time charter for approximately 30 days at a rate of $24,000 per day. Hire is paid every 15 days in advance less a 5.00% third-party brokerage commission. The vessel delivered to charterers on October 18, 2018.

~~(5)~~

We have reached an agreement with Minmetals Logistics Zhejang Co. Ltd. on a time charter for approximately 35 days at a rate of $19,500 per day. Hire is paid every 15 days in advance less a 5.00% third-party brokerage commission. The vessel delivered to charterers November 4, 2018.

~~(6)~~

We have reached an agreement with Pan Ocean Co., Ltd. on a time charter for approximately 50 days at a rate of $21,200 per day. Hire is paid every 15 days in advance less a 5.00% third-party brokerage commission. The vessel delivered to charterers September 12, 2018.

~~(7)~~

We have reached an agreement with Pacific Bulk Cape Company Ltd. on a time charter for 9.5 to 14.5 months at a rate of $15,300 per day. Hire is paid every 15 days in advance less a 5.00% third-party brokerage commission. The vessel delivered to charterers on January 20, 2018.

~~(8)~~

We have reached an agreement with Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd. on a spot market-related time charter for 3.5 to 6 months at a rate based on 102.50% of the Baltic Capesize Index (BCI), published by the Baltic Exchange, as reflected in daily reports. Hire is paid every 15 days in arrears less a 5.00% third-party brokerage commission. The vessel is delivered to charterers August 6, 2018.

~~(9)~~

We have reached an agreement with Pacific Bulk Cape Company Ltd. on a time charter for approximately 65 days at a rate of $5,000 per day. If the time charter extends beyond 65 days, the hire rate will be $22,000 for the remainder of the time charter. Hire is paid every 15 days in advance less a 5.00% third-party brokerage commission. The vessel delivered to charterers on September 20, 2018.

~~(10)~~

We have reached an agreement with Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha on a time charter for 3 to 6 months at a rate of $23,500 per day. Hire is paid every 15 days in advance less a 5.00% third-party brokerage commission. The vessel delivered to charterers on September 25, 2018.

~~(11)~~

We have reached an agreement with Rainbow Success Ltd. on a time charter for approximately 25 days at a rate of $9,250 per day. Hire is paid every 15 days in advance less a 5.00% third-party brokerage commission. The vessel delivered to charterers on November 6, 2018.

~~(12)~~

We have reached an agreement with Grand Fortune Marine Ltd. on a time charter for approximately 25 days at a rate of $11,250 per day. Hire is paid every 15 days in advance less a 5.00% third-party brokerage commission. The vessel delivered to charterers on October 26, 2018. The vessel had previously redelivered to Genco on October 24, 2018.

~~(13)~~

We have reached an agreement with Sinocean Shipping Co. Ltd. on a time charter for approximately 25 days at a rate of $9,250 per day. Hire is paid every 15 days in advance less a 5.00% third-party brokerage commission. The vessel delivered charterers on October 29, 2018.

~~(14)~~

We have reached an agreement with United Bulk Carriers International S.A. on a spot market-related time charter for 10 to 14 months at a rate based on 96% of the Baltic Panamax Index (BPI), published by the Baltic Exchange, as reflected in daily reports. Hire is paid every 15 days in arrears less a 5.00% third-party brokerage commission. The vessel delivered to charterers on August 25, 2018. A ballast bonus was awarded.

4946

Table of Contents

~~(15)~~

We have reached an agreement with Nordic Bulk Carriers A/S on a time charter for approximately 40 days at a rate of $11,000 per day. The rate then increased to $14,000 for an additional 40 days and $14,750 for approximately 40 days subsequent. Hire is paid every 15 days in advance less a 5.00% third-party brokerage commission. The vessel delivered to charterers on June 14, 2018.

~~(16)~~

We have reached an agreement with Cargill International S.A. on a time charter for approximately 65 days at a rate of $9,500 per day. If the time charter extends beyond 65 days, the hire rate will be $14,750 for the remainder of the time charter. Hire is paid every 15 days in advance less a 5.00% third-party brokerage commission. The vessel delivered to charterers on October 19, 2018. The vessel had previously redelivered to Genco on October 16, 2018.

~~(17)~~

We have reached an agreement with D/S Norden on a time charter approximately 45 days at a rate of $12,000 per day. If the time charter extends beyond 45 days, the hire rate will be $15,500 for the remainder of the time charter. Hire is paid every 15 days in advance less a 5.00% third-party brokerage commission. The vessel delivered to charterers on October 11, 2018.

~~(18)~~

We have reached an agreement with Cargill International S.A. on a time charter for approximately 40 days at a rate of $21,000 per day. Hire is paid every 15 days in advance less a 5.00% third-party brokerage commission. The vessel delivered to charterers on October 19, 2018.

~~(19)~~

We have reached an agreement with Canpotex Shipping Services on a time charter for approximately 65 days at a rate of $5,000 per day. If the time charter extends beyond 65 days, the hire rate will be $13,500 for the remainder of the time charter. Hire is paid every 15 days in advance less a 1.25% third-party brokerage commission. The vessel delivered to charterers on September 14, 2018.

~~(20)~~

We have reached an agreement with Rudolph A. Oetker A/S & Co. KG on a time charter for approximately 40 days at a rate of $9,995 per day. If the time charter extends beyond 40 days, the hire rate will be $14,000 for the remainder of the time charter. Hire is paid every 15 days in advance less a 5.00% third-party brokerage commission. The vessel delivered to charterers on October 28, 2018.

~~(21)~~

We have reached an agreement with Pan Ocean Co., Ltd. on a time charter for 3 to 5.5 months at a rate of $13,000 per day. Hire is paid every 15 days in advance less a 5.00% third-party brokerage commission. The vessel delivered to charterers on July 4, 2018.

~~(22)~~

We have reached an agreement with CCCC-Int Shipping Corp. on a time charter for approximately 90 days at a rate of $15,100 per day. Hire is paid every 15 days in advance less a 5% third-party brokerage commission. The vessel is expected to deliver to charterers on or about November 9, 2018.

~~(23)~~

We have reached an agreement with Bunge S.A. GVA on a time charter for approximately 35 days at a rate of $19,250 per day. Hire is paid every 15 days in advance less a 5.00% third-party brokerage commission. The vessel delivered to charterers on October 9, 2018.

~~(24)~~

We have reached an agreement with Canpotex Shipping Services on a time charter for approximately 60 days at a rate of $11,000 per day. Hire is paid every 15 days in advance less a 1.25% third-party brokerage commission. The vessel delivered to charterers on November 1, 2018.

~~(25)~~

We have reached an agreement with Louis Dreyfus Company Suisse S.A. on a time charter for approximately 40 days at a rate of $21,000 per day. Hire is paid every 15 days in advance less a 5.00% third-party brokerage commission. The vessel delivered to charterers on October 31, 2018. The vessel had previously redelivered to Genco on October 19, 2018.

~~(26)~~

We have reached an agreement with PCL Shipping Pte. Ltd. on a time charter for approximately 60 days at a rate of $14,075 per day. Hire is paid every 15 days in advance less a 6.75% third-party brokerage commission. The vessel delivered to charterers on September 7, 2018.

~~Table of Contents~~

~~(27)~~

We have reached an agreement with Western Bulk Pte. Ltd. on a time charter for approximately 4 to 6.5 months at a rate of $13,500 per day. Hire is paid every 15 days in advance less a 5.00% third-party brokerage commission. The vessel delivered to charterers on October 23, 2018.

~~(28)~~

We have reached an agreement with Cargill International S.A. on a time charter for approximately 30 days at a rate of $16,000 per day. Hire is paid every 15 days in advance less a 5.00% third-party brokerage commission. The vessel delivered to charterers on October 11, 2018.

~~(29)~~

We have reached an agreement with Elim Spring Maritime on a time charter for approximately 25 days at a rate of $8,000 per day. Hire is paid every 15 days in advance less a 5.00% third-party brokerage commission. The vessel delivered to charterers on November 7, 2018.

~~(30)~~

We have reached an agreement with Cargill International S.A. on a time charter for approximately 35 days at a rate of $12,750 per day. Hire is paid every 15 days in advance less a 5.00% third-party brokerage commission. The vessel delivered to charterers on October 21, 2018.

~~(31)~~

We have reached an agreement with Western Bulk Pte. Ltd. on a time charter for approximately 2.5 to 5 months at a rate of $10,500 per day. Hire is paid every 15 days in advance less a 5.00% third-party brokerage commission. The vessel delivered to charterers on August 18, 2018.

~~(32)~~

We have reached an agreement with Cargill International S.A. on a time charter for approximately 2.5 to 5.5 months days at a rate of $9,750 per day. Hire is paid every 15 days in advance less a 5.00% third-party brokerage commission. The vessel delivered to charterers on June 18, 2018.

~~(33)~~

We have reached an agreement with Trafigura Maritime Logistics Pte. Ltd. on a time charter for approximately 50 days at a rate of $11,250 per day. Hire is paid every 15 days in advance less a 5.00% third-party brokerage commission. The vessel delivered to charterers on August 29, 2018.

Three months ended September 30, ~~2018~~2019 compared to the three months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018

VOYAGE REVENUES-

For the three months ended September 30, ~~2018,~~2019, voyage revenues increased by ~~$41.1~~$11.5 million, or ~~80.3%~~12.5%, to ~~$92.3~~$103.8 million as compared to ~~$51.2~~$92.3 million for the three months ended September 30, ~~2017.~~2018. The increase in voyage revenues was primarily due to ~~the~~increased employment of vessels on spot market voyage charters, ~~as well as higher spot market rates achieved~~partially offset by the ~~majority~~effect of trading our ~~vessels.~~Capesize vessels primarily in the Pacific Basin and offhire related to scrubber installations, ballast water treatment system installations and special surveys as discussed below.

The average Time Charter Equivalent (“TCE”) rate of our fleet increased ~~26.6%~~9.3% to $11,687 a day for the three months ended September 30, 2019 from $10,696 a day for the three months ended September 30, ~~2018 from $8,448 a day for the three months ended September 30, 2017.~~2018. The increase in TCE rates ~~was primarily due to~~resulted from higher charter rates achieved by the majority of ~~the vessels in~~ our ~~fleet during~~vessels.

In the third quarter of ~~2018 as compared~~2019, the drybulk market improved significantly reaching multi-year highs in the process. Specifically, the Baltic Capesize Index was supported by record steel production in China and increased Brazilian iron ore shipments during a period of constrained vessel capacity due to the ~~same period last year. During the third quarter~~global fleet’s preparation ahead of ~~2018, we repositioned select Capesize and minor bulk vessels, given our market expectations through the balance~~IMO 2020. As a result of the ~~year. During~~preparation to get our Capesize vessels fitted with scrubbers ahead of the ~~third quarter~~IMO 2020 compliance date of ~~2018,~~January 1, 2020, we made the ~~drybulk freight market strengthened relative~~strategic decision to trade our vessels primarily in the Pacific basin, closer to the ~~second quarter with sequential increases~~shipyard, to aid in ~~Capesize, Panamax, and Supramax average earnings as reported by the Baltic Exchange. Demand~~meeting our designated shipyard slot dates for ~~raw materials remains strong as global steel production has increased~~scrubber installations. However, this also limited our commercial trading capabilities in the ~~year-to-date led primarily by growth~~short-term. This resulted in ~~both China and India. On the supply side, global net~~our Capesize fleet ~~growth has remained low~~remaining in the ~~year-to-date primarily driven by~~Pacific basin, a ~~significant reduction in newbuilding vessel deliveries as compared~~region that saw rates trade at a discount to the ~~prior year period.~~ Atlantic basin, notwithstanding our long-term commercial strategy that entails a more dynamic vessel positioning to better capture market fundamentals. We had 22 vessels enter the shipyard for scrubber installations, ballast water treatment system installations, scheduled special surveys and other repairs, resulting in associated offhire time of 601 days for the quarter.

For the three months ended September 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017,~~2018, we had ~~5,673.0~~5,336.0 and ~~5,520.0~~5,673.0 ownership days, respectively. The ~~increase~~decrease in ownership days is primarily ~~a result~~due to the sale of eight vessels during the second half of 2018 and the first quarter of 2019 partially offset by the delivery of six vessels during the third quarter of ~~2018 partially offset by the sale of two vessels during the third quarter of~~ 2018. Fleet utilization increased ~~marginally~~ to 98.9% during the three months ended September 30, 2019 from 98.5% during the three months ended September 30, 2018, ~~from 97.9% during the three months ended September 30, 2017.~~primarily due to a decrease in offhire days.

~~Table of Contents~~

VOYAGE EXPENSES-

In time charters, spot market-related time charters and pool agreements, operating costs including crews, maintenance and insurance are typically paid by the owner of the vessel and specified voyage costs such as fuel and port charges are paid by the charterer. These expenses are borne by the Company during spot market voyage charters. There are certain other non-specified voyage expenses such as commissions, which are typically borne by us. Voyage expenses include port and canal charges, fuel (bunker) expenses and brokerage commissions payable to unaffiliated third parties. Port and canal charges and bunker expenses primarily increase in periods during which vessels are employed on spot market voyage charters because these expenses are for the account of the vessel owner. At the inception of a time charter, we record the difference between the cost of bunker fuel delivered by the terminating charterer and the bunker fuel sold to the new charterer as a gain or loss within voyage expenses. Voyage expenses also include the cost of bunkers consumed during short-term time charters pursuant to the terms of the time charter agreement. Additionally, we may record ~~the~~ lower of cost and net realizable value adjustments to re-value the bunker fuel on a quarterly basis ~~if required.~~for certain time charter agreements where the inventory is subject to gains and losses. Refer to Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Voyage expenses increased by ~~$25.9~~$11.5 million from ~~$5.6 million during the three months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to~~ $31.5 million during the three months ended September 30, ~~2018.~~2018 as compared to $43.0 million during the three months ended September 30, 2019. This increase was primarily due to the employment of vessels on additional spot market voyage charters during the third quarter of ~~2018~~2019, which incur significantly higher voyage expenses as compared to time charters, spot market-related time charters and pool arrangements. ~~Additionally, there was an increase in the costs~~

Table of ~~bunkers consumed during short-term time charters during the third quarter of 2018 as compared to the third quarter of 2017.~~Contents

VESSEL OPERATING EXPENSES-

Vessel operating expenses ~~increased marginally~~decreased by $0.4 million from ~~$25.1 million during the three months ended September 30, 2017 to~~ $25.2 million during the three months ended September 30, ~~2018.~~2018 to $24.7 million during the three months ended September 30, 2019. The ~~increase~~decrease was primarily ~~a result~~due to fewer owned vessels during the third quarter of ~~the delivery of six vessels during~~2019 as compared to the third quarter of 2018, partially offset by ~~a decrease in~~higher drydocking related ~~expenses and a decrease in the timing of expenses related to spare parts.~~expenses.

Daily vessel operating expenses ~~decreased~~increased to ~~$4,434~~$4,631 per vessel per day for the three months ended September 30, ~~2018~~2019 from ~~$4,553~~$4,434 per day for the three months ended September 30, ~~2017.~~2018. The ~~decrease~~increase in daily vessel operating expense was predominantly due to ~~lower expenses~~higher drydocking related expenses. Refer to ~~maintenance, drydocking, spare parts and stores, partially offset by higher expenses related to crewing.~~“Capital Expenditures” below for further detail. We believe daily vessel operating expenses are best measured for comparative purposes over a 12-month period in order to take into account all of the expenses that each vessel in our fleet will incur over a full year of operation. Our actual daily vessel operating expenses per vessel for the three months ended September 30, ~~2018~~2019 were ~~$6 below~~$106 above the weighted-average budgeted rate of ~~$4,440~~$4,525 per vessel per day for the entire year.

Our vessel operating expenses, which generally represent fixed costs for each vessel, increase to the extent our fleet expands. Other factors beyond our control, some of which may affect the shipping industry in general, including, for instance, developments relating to market prices for crewing, lubes, and insurance, may also cause these expenses to increase.

CHARTER HIRE EXPENSES-

Charter hire expenses increased by $4.8 million from $0.7 million during the three months ended September 30, 2018 to $5.5 million during the three months ended September 30, 2019. During the third quarter of ~~2018,~~2019, we ~~time chartered-in two~~chartered in eight third-party vessels ~~which resulted in total expenses of $0.7 million. We did not time charter-in any~~as compared to only two vessels ~~prior to~~during the ~~second~~third quarter of 2018.

GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES-

We incur general and administrative expenses ~~which~~that relate to our onshore non-vessel-related activities. Our general and administrative expenses include our payroll expenses, including those relating to our executive officers, ~~rent,~~operating lease expense, legal, auditing and other professional expenses. General and administrative expenses include nonvested stock amortization expense which represent the amortization of stock-based compensation that has been issued to our Directors

~~Table of Contents~~

and employees pursuant to Management Incentive Program (the “MIP”) and the 2015 Equity Incentive Plan. Refer to Note 1415 — Stock-Based Compensation in our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. General and administrative expenses also include legal and professional fees associated with our credit facilities, which are not capitalizable to deferred financing costs. We expect to incur additional general and administrative expenses during ~~2018~~2019 as a result of our global expansion to Singapore and ~~Denmark.~~Copenhagen.

For the three months ended September 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017,~~2018, general and administrative expenses were ~~$5.0~~$6.1 million and ~~$5.9~~$5.0 million, respectively. The ~~$0.9~~$1.1 million ~~decrease~~increase was primarily due to ~~a decrease~~an increase in ~~nonvested stock amortization expense. Refer to Note 14 — Stock-Based Compensation~~compensation related expenses as well as an increase in ~~our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.~~ professional fees.

TECHNICAL MANAGEMENT FEES-

We incur management fees to third-party technical management companies for the day-to-day management of our vessels, including performing routine maintenance, attending to vessel operations and arranging for crews and supplies.

Technical management fees ~~increased marginally to~~were $1.9 million and $2.0 million during the three months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, ~~as compared~~respectively. The decrease was due to ~~$1.9 million~~a smaller fleet during the ~~three months ended September 30, 2017.~~third quarter of 2019.

DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION-

We depreciate the cost of our vessels on a straight-line basis over the expected useful life of each vessel. Depreciation is based on the cost of the vessel less its estimated residual value. We estimate the useful life of our vessels

Table of Contents

to be 25 years and we estimate the residual value by taking the estimated scrap value of $310 per lightweight ton times the weight of the ship in lightweight tons.

Depreciation and amortization expense ~~decreased~~increased by ~~$0.5~~$0.9 million to $18.2 million during the three months ended September 30, 2019 as compared to $17.3 million during the three months ended September 30, ~~2018 as compared to $17.8 million during the three months ended September 30, 2017.~~ 2018. This ~~decrease~~increase was primarily due to ~~the decrease~~an increase in depreciation expense for the nine vessels that were deemed to be impaired as of February 27, 2018. These vessels were reduced to their respective fair market values on those date and are being depreciated over their remaining useful life. Additionally, there was a decrease in depreciation expense for the five vessels that were deemed to be impaired as of August 4, 2017, of which two vessels were soldrecorded during the third quarter of ~~2018. These decreases were offset by an increase in depreciation expense~~2019 for the six vessels delivered during the third quarter of ~~2018.~~2018, partially offset by a decrease in depreciation for the six vessels that were sold during the fourth quarter of 2018 and the first quarter of 2019, as well as a decrease for the five vessels that were impaired during the second and third quarter of 2019. Refer to Note 2 4 — ~~Summary of Significant Accounting Policies~~ Vessel Acquisitions and Dispositions in our Condensed Consolidated Financial ~~Statements for further information.~~ Statements.

IMPAIRMENT OF VESSEL ASSETS-

During the three months ended September 30, ~~2018 and 2017,~~2019, we recorded ~~$0 and $18.7~~$12.2 million of impairment of vessel assets. There was no impairment of vessel assets ~~respectively.~~ during the three months ended September 30, 2018.

On ~~August~~November 4, ~~2017, our Board of Directors determined~~2019, the Company entered into an agreement to ~~dispose of~~sell the Genco ~~Beauty,~~Raptor, a 2007-built Panamax vessel, to a third party for $10.2 million less a 2.0% commission payable to a third party. As the ~~Genco Explorer, the Genco Knight, the Genco Progress and the Genco Vigour at times and on terms to be determined in the future. Given this decision, and that the estimated future~~anticipated undiscounted cash flows, ~~for each of these vessels~~including the net sales price, did not exceed the net book value of the vessel as of September 30, 2019, the vessel value for ~~each vessel, we reduced~~ the ~~carrying value~~Genco Raptor was adjusted to its net sales price of ~~these vessels to their respective fair market values at August 4, 2017.~~$10.0 million as of September 30, 2019. This resulted in an ~~$18.7 million~~ impairment loss of $5.9 million during the three months ended September 30, ~~2017.~~ 2019.

On September 25, 2019, the Company entered into an agreement to sell the Genco Thunder, a 2007-built Panamax vessel, for $10.4 million less a 2.0% broker commission payable to a third party. Therefore, the vessel value for the Genco Thunder was adjusted to its net sales price of $10.2 million as of September 30, 2019. This resulted in an impairment loss of $5.7 million during the three months ended September 30, 2019.

On September 20, 2019, the Company entered into an agreement to sell the Genco Champion, a 2006-built Handysize vessel, for $6.6 million less a 3.0% broker commission payable to a third party. Therefore, the vessel value for the Genco Champion was adjusted to its net sales price of $6.4 million as of September 30, 2019. This resulted in an impairment loss of $0.6 million during the three months ended September 30, 2019.

Refer to Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statement for further information.

GAIN ON SALE OF VESSELS-

During the third quarter of 2018, we recorded a net gain on sale of vessels of $1.5 million related the sale of the Genco Progress on September 13, 2018 and the sale of the Genco Surprise on August 7, 2018. There were no vessels sold during the third quarter of ~~2017.~~

~~Table of Contents~~

2019.

OTHER (EXPENSE) INCOME-

NET INTEREST EXPENSE –

Net interest expense ~~decreased~~increased by ~~$0.8~~$0.3 million from ~~$7.4 million during the three months ended September 30, 2017 to~~ $6.6 million during the three months ended September 30, ~~2018.~~2018 to $6.9 million during the three months ended September 30, 2019. Net interest expense during the three months ended September 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017~~2018 consisted of interest expense under our credit facilities and amortization of deferred financing costs for those facilities. ~~The decrease in net interest expense is~~This increase was primarily due to ~~$0.6~~a $0.2 million ~~increase~~decrease in interest income during the third quarter of ~~2018~~2019 as compared to the same period during ~~2017 as result of~~2018 due to a decrease in interest earned on our ~~cash accounts and~~ time deposits. There was also a $0.1 million increase in interest expense was primarily due to an increase in the interest expense associated with the $108 Million Credit Facility, which was entered into on August 14, 2018 partially offset by a decrease in interest expense associated with the $495 Million Credit Facility as the result of a lower debt balance due to required loan repayments. Refer to Note 7 — Debt in our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for information regarding our credit facilities.

Table of Contents

Nine months ended September 30, ~~2018~~2019 compared to the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018

VOYAGE REVENUES-

For the nine months ended September 30, ~~2018,~~2019, voyage revenues increased by ~~$120.5~~$25.5 million, or ~~89.4%~~10.0%, to ~~$255.3~~$280.8 million as compared to ~~$134.8~~$255.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017.~~ 2018. The increase in voyage revenues was primarily due to ~~the~~increased employment of vessels on spot market voyage charters, ~~as well as higher spot market rates achieved~~partially offset by the ~~majority~~effect of trading our ~~vessels.~~Capesize vessels primarily in the Pacific basin and offhire related to scrubber installations, ballast water treatment system installations and special surveys as noted above for the three months ended September 30, 2019.

The average ~~TCE~~Time Charter Equivalent (“TCE”) rate of our fleet ~~increased 39.1%~~decreased 12.2% to $9,405 a day for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 from $10,710 a day for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2018 from $7,698 a day for the nine months ended September 30, 2017.~~ 2018. The ~~increase~~decrease in TCE rates was primarily due to ~~higher~~lower rates achieved by the majority of the vessels in our ~~fleet~~fleet.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, we had 15,861.2 and 16,532.9 ownership days, respectively. The decrease in ownership days is primarily due to the sale of eight vessels during the second half of 2018 and the first quarter of 2019 partially offset by the delivery of six vessels during the third quarter of 2018. Fleet utilization decreased to 97.9% during the nine months ended September 30, 2019 from 98.5% during the nine months ended September 30, 2018, primarily due to an increase in offhire time during 2019.

VOYAGE EXPENSES-

Voyage expenses increased by $49.2 million from $78.6 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2018 as compared to ~~the same period last year.~~

For the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, we had 16,532.9 and 16,687.4 ownership days, respectively. The decrease in ownership days is a result of the sale of five of our vessels during the first half of 2017 as compared to the delivery of six vessels and sale of two vessels during the third quarter of 2018. Fleet utilization increased marginally to 98.5% during the nine months ended September 30, 2018 from 97.8% during the nine months ended September 30, 2017.

~~VOYAGE EXPENSES-~~

~~Voyage expenses increased by $68.9 million from $9.7~~$127.8 million during the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017 as compared to $78.6 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2018.~~2019. This increase was primarily due to the employment of vessels on additional spot market voyage charters during the nine months ended September 30, ~~2018 which~~2019 as compared to the same period during 2018. Spot market voyage charters incur significantly higher voyage expenses as compared to time charters, spot market-related time charters and pool arrangements. ~~Additionally, there was an increase in the costs of bunkers consumed during short-term time charters during the nine months ended September 30, 2018 as compared to the same period during 2017.~~

VESSEL OPERATING EXPENSES-

Vessel operating expenses decreased by ~~$1.3~~$0.4 million from ~~$73.9 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 to~~ $72.6 million during the nine months ended September 30, ~~2018. This~~2018 to $72.3 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2019. The decrease was primarily due to fewer owned vessels during the ~~timing of~~nine months ended September 30, 2019 as compared to the same period during 2018, partially offset by higher drydocking related expenses.

Daily vessel operating expenses ~~decreased~~increased to ~~$4,394~~$4,556 per vessel per day for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2018~~2019 from ~~$4,427~~$4,394 per day for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017.~~2018. The ~~decrease~~increase in daily vessel operating ~~expenses~~expense was predominantly due to ~~lower~~higher drydocking related expenses ~~partially offset by higher expenses~~(refer to “Capital Expenditures” below for further detail), as well as crew related ~~to the purchase of stores.~~expenses. We believe daily vessel operating expenses are best measured for comparative purposes over a 12-month period in order to take into account all of the expenses that each vessel in our fleet will incur over a full year of operation. Our actual daily vessel operating expenses per vessel for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2018~~2019 were ~~$46 below~~$31 above the weighted-average budgeted rate of ~~$4,440~~$4,525 per vessel per day for the entire year.

~~Table of Contents~~

CHARTER HIRE EXPENSES-

Charter hire expenses increased by $11.5 million from $1.2 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2018 to $12.7 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2019. During the nine months ended September 30, ~~2018,~~2019, we ~~time chartered-in four~~chartered in 23 third-party vessels ~~which resulted in total expenses of $1.2 million. We did not time charter-in any vessels prior~~as compared to only four during the ~~nine months ended September 30,~~same period during 2018.

GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES-

For the nine months ended September 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017,~~2018, general and administrative expenses were ~~$16.8~~$18.3 million and ~~$16.6~~$16.8 million, respectively. The ~~$0.2~~$1.5 million increase was primarily due to an increase in compensation ~~expense as well as an increase in legal and professional fees associated with the refinancing~~related expenses.

Table of our debt with the $460 Million Credit Facility (refer to Note 7 — Debt in our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements). These increases were partially offset by a decrease in nonvested stock amortization expense. Refer to Note 14 — Stock-Based Compensation in our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further information. Contents

TECHNICAL MANAGEMENT FEES-

Technical management fees ~~increased marginally to~~were $5.7 million and $5.9 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, ~~as compared~~respectively. The decrease was due to ~~$5.7 million~~a smaller fleet during the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017.~~ 2019.

DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION-

Depreciation and amortization expense ~~decreased~~increased by ~~$3.6~~$3.9 million to $54.5 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2019 as compared to $50.6 million during the nine months ended September 30, ~~2018 as compared~~2018. This increase was primarily due to ~~$54.2 million~~depreciation expense recorded during the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017.~~ This decrease was primarily due to the decrease in depreciation expense for the nine vessels that were deemed to be impaired as of February 27, 2018. Additionally, there was a decrease in depreciation expense for the five vessels that were deemed to be impaired as of August 4, 2017, of which two vessels were sold during the third quarter of 2018. These vessels were reduced to their respective fair market values on those dates and are being depreciated over their remaining useful life. There was also a decrease in the amortization of drydocking assets as there were less vessels that completed drydocking during the nine months ended September 30, 2018 as compared to the same period during 2017. These decreases were partially offset by an increase in depreciation expense2019 for the six vessels delivered during the third quarter of ~~2018.~~2018, partially offset by a decrease in depreciation for the eight vessels that were sold during the second half of 2018 and the first quarter of 2019. Refer to Note 2 4 — ~~Summary of Significant Accounting Policies~~ Vessel Acquisitions and Dispositions in our Condensed Consolidated Financial ~~Statements~~Statements. There was also an increase in in the amortization of drydocking assets as there were more vessels that completed drydockings during the nine months ended September 30, 2019 as compared to the same period during 2018. Refer to “Capital Expenditures” below for further ~~information regarding impairment.~~ detail.

IMPAIRMENT OF VESSEL ASSETS-

During the nine months ended September 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017,~~2018, we recorded $26.1 million and $56.6 million ~~and $22.0 million~~ of impairment of vessel assets, respectively.

On November 4, 2019, the Company entered into an agreement to sell the Genco Raptor, a 2007-built Panamax vessel, to a third party for $10.2 million less a 2.0% commission payable to a third party. As the anticipated undiscounted cash flows, including the net sales price, did not exceed the net book value of the vessel as of September 30, 2019, the vessel value for the Genco Raptor was adjusted to its net sales price of $10.0 million as of September 30, 2019. This resulted in an impairment loss of $5.9 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2019.

On August 2, 2019, we entered into an agreement to sell the Genco Challenger, a 2003-built Handysize vessel, for $5,250 less a 2.0% broker commission payable to a third party. As the anticipated undiscounted cash flows, including the net sales price, did not exceed the net book value of the vessel as of June 30, 2019, we reduced the carrying value of the Genco Challenger to the net sales price on June 30, 2019. This resulted in an impairment loss of $4.4 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2019.

At June 30, 2019, we determined that the expected estimated future undiscounted cash flows for the Genco Champion, a 2006-built Handysize vessel, and the Genco Charger, a 2005-built Handysize vessel, did not exceed the net book value of these vessels as of June 30, 2019. As such, we adjusted the value of these vessels to their respective fair market values as of June 30, 2019. This resulted in an impairment loss of $9.5 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2019

On July 24, 2018, the Company entered into an agreement to sell the Genco Surprise. As the anticipated undiscounted cash flows, including the net sales price, did not exceed the net book value of the vessel as of June 30, 2018, we reduced the carrying value of the Genco Surprise to the net sales price on June 30, 2018. This resulted in an impairment loss of $0.2 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2018.

Table of Contents

On February 27, 2018, our Board of Directors determined to dispose of the Company’s following nine vessels; the Genco Cavalier, the Genco Loire, the Genco Lorraine, the Genco Muse, the Genco Normandy, the Baltic Cougar, the Baltic Jaguar, the Baltic Leopard and the Baltic Panther, at times and on terms to be determined in the future. Given this decision, and that the estimated future undiscounted cash flows for each of these older vessels did not exceed the net book value for each vessel, we have adjusted the values of these older vessels to their respective fair market values during the nine months ended September 30, 2018. This resulted in an impairment loss of $56.4 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2018.

At June 30, 2017, we determined that the sum of the estimated undiscounted future cash flows attributable to the Genco Surprise did not exceed the carrying value of the vessel at June 30, 2017. As such, we reduced the carrying

~~Table of Contents~~

~~value of the Genco Surprise to its fair market value as of June 30, 2017, which resulted in an impairment loss of $3.3 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2017.~~

On August 4, 2017, our Board of Directors determined to dispose of the Genco Beauty, the Genco Explorer, the Genco Knight, the Genco Progress and the Genco Vigour at times and on terms to be determined in the future. Given this decision, and that the estimated future undiscounted cash flows for each of these vessels did not exceed the net book value for each vessel, we reduced the carrying value of these vessels to their respective fair market values at August 4, 2017. This resulted in an $18.7 million impairment loss during the nine months ended September 30, 2017.

Refer to Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statement for further information.

GAIN ON SALE OF VESSELS-

During the nine months ended September 30, 2019, we recorded a net gain on sale of vessels of $0.6 million related primarily to the sale of the Genco Vigour on January 28, 2019. During the nine months ended September 30, 2018, we recorded a net gain on sale of vessels of $1.5 million related to the sale of the Genco Progress and the Genco Surprise during the third quarter of 2018. During the nine months ended September 30, 2017, we recorded a net gain on sale of vessels of $7.7 million related primarily to the sale of the Genco Prosperity, the Genco Success, the Genco Carrier, the Genco Reliance and the Genco Wisdom for which the sales were completed during the first half of 2017.

OTHER (EXPENSE) INCOME-

NET INTEREST EXPENSE –

Net interest expense decreased ~~marginally~~ by ~~$0.1~~$0.3 million from ~~$21.6 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 to~~ $21.5 million during the nine months ended September 30, ~~2018.~~2018 to $21.2 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2019. Net interest expense during the nine months ended September 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017~~2018 consisted of interest expense under our credit facilities and amortization of deferred financing costs for those facilities. This decrease was primarily due to a $0.5 million increase in interest income during the nine months ended September 30, 2019 as compared to the same period during 2018 due to an increase in interest earned on our time deposits and our cash accounts. Refer to Note 7 — Debt in our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for information regarding our credit facilities.

IMPAIRMENT OF RIGHT-OF-USE ASSET –

During the nine months ended September 30, 2019, we recognized $0.2 million of impairment charges on its operating lease right-of-use asset in accordance with ASC 360. Refer to Note 13 — Leases in our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.

LOSS ON DEBT EXTINGUISHMENT –

During the nine months ended September 30, 2018, we recorded a $4.5 million loss on debt extinguishment as a result of the refinancing of our $400 Million Credit Facility, $98 Million Credit Facility and 2014 Term Loan Facilities with the $460 Million Credit Facility on June 5, 2018. Refer to Note 7 — Debt in our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for information regarding our credit facilities.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Our primary sources of liquidity are cash flow from operations, cash on hand, equity offerings and credit facility borrowings. We currently use our funds primarily for the acquisition of vessels generally and under our ongoing fleet renewal program, drydocking for our vessels, and satisfying working capital requirements as may be needed to support our business and make required payments under our indebtedness. Our ability to continue to meet our liquidity needs is subject to and will be affected by cash utilized in operations, the economic or business environment in which we operate, ~~weakness in~~ shipping industry conditions, the financial condition of our customers, vendors and service providers, our ability to comply with the financial and other covenants of our indebtedness, and other factors. We expect that our fuel costs and value of our fuel inventories will increase ~~beginning~~ in 2019 as a result of sulfur emission regulations due to take effect on January 1, ~~2010.~~2020.

Table of Contents

On June 19, 2018, we closed an equity offering of 7,015,000 shares of common stock at an offering price of $16.50 per share. We received net proceeds of approximately ~~$109.7~~$109.6 million after deducting underwriters’ discounts and commissions and other expenses. We used the net proceeds to finance a portion of the purchase price for the two Capesize and two Ultramax vessels that we acquired during the third quarter of 2018. Refer to Note 4 — Vessel Acquisitions and Dispositions.

~~Table of Contents~~

~~On August 14, 2018, we~~We entered into ~~a five-year senior secured credit facility (the “$108 Million Credit Facility”) with Cr~~é~~dit Agricole Corporate & Investment Bank. We have used proceeds from~~ the ~~$108~~$495 Million Credit Facility to finance a portion of the purchase price for the six vessels, as identified in Note 4 — Vessel Acquisitions and Dispositions, which were delivered during the third quarter of 2018 and serve as collateral under the $108 Million Credit Facility. We drew down a total of $108.0 million during the third quarter of 2018, which represents 45% of the appraised value of the six vessels. The final maturity date of the $108 Million Credit Facility is August 14, 2023. The $108 Million Credit Facility provides for the following additional key terms:

Borrowings under the $108 Million Credit Facility bear interest at LIBOR plus 2.50% through September 30, 2019 and LIBOR plus a range of 2.25% to 2.75% thereafter, dependent upon our ratio of total net indebtedness to the last twelve months EBITDA.

Scheduled amortization payments under the $108 Million Credit Facility reflect a repayment profile whereby the facility shall have been repaid to nil when the average vessel aged of the collateral vessels reaches 20 years. Based on ~~this, the required repayments are $1.6 million per quarter commencing on December 31, 2018, with a final balloon payment on the maturity date.~~

~~Mandatory prepayments are to be applied to remaining amortization payments pro rata, while voluntary prepayments are to be applied to remaining amortization payments in order of maturity.~~

~~Acquisitions and additional indebtedness are allowed subject to compliance with financial covenants, a collateral maintenance test, and other customary conditions.~~

~~Key financial covenants, which are based on those in our $460 Million Credit Facility, include:~~

~~minimum liquidity, with unrestricted cash and cash equivalents to equal or exceed the greater of $30.0 million and 7.5% of total indebtedness~~ ~~(no restricted cash is required)~~;

~~debt to capitalization, with the ratio of total indebtedness to total capitalization to be not more than 70%; and~~

~~collateral maintenance, with the aggregate appraised value of collateral vessels to be at least 135% of the principal amount of the loan outstanding under the $108 Million Credit Facility.~~

~~At September 30, 2018, we believe we were in compliance with all financial covenants under the $108 Million Credit Facility.~~

~~Table of Contents~~

On May 31, 2018, ~~we entered into a five-year $460 million senior secured credit facility (the “$460 Million Credit Facility”). On June 5, 2018, proceeds of $460.0 million from the $460 Million Credit Facility were~~which was initially used ~~together with cash on hand,~~ to refinance ~~all of~~ our prior credit ~~facilities (the~~facilities: the $400 Million Credit Facility, the $98 Million Credit Facility and the 2014 Term Loan Facilities ~~as defined in~~on June 5, 2018 and originally allowed borrowings of up to $460 million. On February 28, 2019, we entered into an amendment to the $495 Million Credit Facility that provides for an additional tranche of up to $35 million to finance a portion of the acquisitions, installations, and related costs for exhaust cleaning systems (or “scrubbers”) for 17 of the Company’s Capesize vessels. Additionally, we entered into the $108 Million Credit Facility on August 14, 2018 to finance a portion of the purchase price for the six vessels that were purchased during the third quarter of 2018. Refer to Note 7 –— Debt ofin our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements) into one facility, and pay down the debt of seven of the Company’s oldest vessels, which have been identified for sale. The mandated lead arrangers and bookrunners for this facility are Nordea Bank AB (publ), New York Branch, Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken AB (publ), ABN AMRO Capital USA LLC, DVB Bank SE, Crédit Agricole Corporate & Investment Bank, and Danish Ship Finance A/S. Below are the key terms of this facility:Statements.

~~The final maturity date of the facility is May 31, 2023.~~

Borrowings under the facility bear interest at LIBOR plus 325 basis points through December 31, 2018 and LIBOR plus a range of 300 to 350 basis points thereafter, dependent upon our ratio of total net indebtedness to the last twelve months EBITDA.

Amortization is based on a repayment profile in which the loan will be repaid to nil when the average age of the vessels serving as collateral from time to time reaches 17 years, following an initial non-amortization period ending December 31, 2018; the first scheduled quarterly amortization payment on December 31, 2018 is $15.0 million, with a final payment of $190.0 million due on May 31, 2023; the amortization amounts are to be recalculated based on changes in collateral vessels upon our request.

~~Acquisitions and additional indebtedness are allowed subject to compliance with financial covenants, a collateral maintenance test, and other customary conditions.~~

Dividends may be paid after December 31, 2018 (or potentially earlier if the Company elects to accelerate its first amortization payment due December 31, 2018) subject to customary conditions and a limitation of 50% of consolidated net income for any period during which the collateral maintenance test ratio is 200% or less.

Collateral vessels can be sold or disposed of without prepayment of the loan if replaced with a new vessel within 120 days having an equal or greater appraised value if we are in compliance with the collateral maintenance test.

~~Key covenants include:~~

~~minimum liquidity, with unrestricted cash and cash equivalents to equal or exceed the greater of $30 million and 7.5% of total indebtedness;~~

~~debt to capitalization, with the ratio of total indebtedness to total capitalization to be not more than 70%; and~~

~~collateral maintenance, with the aggregate appraised value of collateral vessels to be at least 135% of the principal amount of the loan outstanding under the facility.~~

Collateral includes the current vessels in our fleet other than the seven vessels identified for sale; collateral vessel earnings and insurance; and time charters in excess of 24 months in respect of the collateral vessels.

At September 30, ~~2018, we believe~~2019, we were in compliance with all financial covenants under the ~~$460~~$495 Million Credit facility and the $108 Million Credit Facility.

~~Table of Contents~~

~~While supply and demand fundamentals have been improving since 2017, persistent~~, historically low rates prior to 2017 resulted in decreases in our prior period revenues. As a result, we experienced negative cash flows, and in turn, our liquidity had been negatively impacted. To address our liquidity and covenant compliance issues at the time, in November 2016 we refinanced or amended our credit facilities and completed a $125 million capital raise. Based on current market conditions, weWe believe ~~these measures are sufficient to address such issues and that~~ our capital resources are sufficient to fund our operations for at least the next twelve months. Given the commencement of quarterly amortization payments of $16.6 million under our credit facilities on December 31, 2018, ~~and~~ anticipated capital expenditures relating to installation of ~~BWTS~~ballast water treatment systems (“BWTS”) and scrubbers on our vessels for environmental regulatory compliance during 2019, as well as the payment of the $0.175 dividend per share and the payment of the $0.325 special dividend per share during the fourth quarter of 2019, we anticipate that our cash expenditures will increase.

We intend to finance a significant portion of the cost associated with scrubbers on our vessels with borrowings as described above and further under “Capital Expenditures” below. Moreover, in the future, we may require capital to fund acquisitions or to improve or support our ongoing operations and debt structure. We may from time to time seek to raise additional capital through equity or debt offerings, selling vessels or other assets, pursuing strategic opportunities, or otherwise. We may also from time to time seek to refinance our indebtedness or obtain waivers or modifications to our credit agreements to obtain more favorable terms, enhance flexibility in conducting our business, or otherwise. We may seek to accomplish any of these independently or in conjunction with one or more of these actions. However, if market conditions are unfavorable, we may be unable to accomplish any of the foregoing on acceptable terms or at all.

Dividends

~~Under~~Our Board of Directors has adopted a quarterly dividend policy to pay a dividend of $0.175 per share. Accordingly, on November 6, 2019, we announced a quarterly dividend of $0.175 per share as well as a special dividend of $0.325 per share. Our quarterly dividend policy and declaration and payment of dividends are subject to legally available funds, compliance with law and contractual obligations and our Board of Directors’ determination that each declaration and payment is in the ~~terms~~best interest of the Company and our ~~$460~~shareholders. Our declaration and payment of dividends is subject to a number of conditions and restrictions as described below.

On November 5, 2019, we entered into amendments with our lenders to the dividend covenants of the credit agreements for our $495 Million Credit Facility and our $108 Million Credit ~~Facility, we~~Facility. Under the terms of these two facilities as so amended, dividends or repurchases of our stock are subject to customary conditions. We may pay dividends ~~following December 31, 2018,~~or repurchase stock under these facilities to the extent our total cash and cash equivalents are greater than $100 million and 18.75% of our total indebtedness, whichever is higher; if we cannot satisfy this condition, we are subject to ~~customary conditions and~~ a limitation of 50% of consolidated net income for the quarter preceding such dividend payment or stock repurchase if the collateral maintenance test ratio is 200% or less for such ~~quarter. We may pay dividends earlier than this if we elect~~quarter, for which purpose the full commitment of up to ~~change the date~~$35 million of our ~~first amortization payment due under the $460 Million Credit Facility on December 31, 2018~~new scrubber tranche is assumed to ~~an earlier date.~~ be drawn.

Table of Contents

The declaration and payment of any dividend or any stock repurchase is subject to the discretion of our Board of ~~Directors, which expects to consider the appropriateness of dividend payments to our shareholders in light of our best interest and relevant legal and contractual requirements.~~Directors. The principal business factors that our Board of Directors ~~would~~expects to consider when determining the timing and amount of dividend payments ~~would be~~or stock repurchases include our earnings, financial condition, and cash requirements at the time. Marshall Islands law generally prohibits the declaration and payment of dividends or stock repurchases other than from surplus. Marshall Islands law also prohibits the declaration and payment of dividends or stock repurchases while a company is insolvent or would be rendered insolvent by the payment of such a dividend or such a stock repurchase.

U.S. Federal Income Tax Treatment of Dividends

For purposes of this discussion, the term "U.S. Holder" means a beneficial owner of our common stock that is, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, (i) an individual U.S. citizen or resident, (ii) a corporation that is created or organized in or under the laws of the United States, any state thereof or the District of Columbia, or any other U.S. entity taxable as a corporation, (iii) an estate the income of which is subject to U.S. federal income taxation regardless of its source, or (iv) a trust if either (x) a court within the United States is able to exercise primary jurisdiction over the administration of the trust and one or more U.S. persons have the authority to control all substantial decisions of the trust, or (y) the trust has a valid election in effect under applicable Treasury Regulations to be treated as a U.S. person. If a partnership, or an entity treated for U.S. federal income tax purposes as a partnership, such as a limited liability company, holds common stock, the tax treatment of a partner will generally depend on the status of the partner and upon the activities of the partnership. If you are a partner in such a partnership holding our common stock, you are encouraged to consult your tax advisor. A beneficial owner of our common stock (other than a partnership) that is not a U.S. Holder is referred to below as a "Non-U.S. Holder."

Subject to the discussion of passive foreign investment company (PFIC) status on pages 41-42 in the 2018 10-K, any distributions made by us to a U.S. Holder with respect to our common shares generally will constitute dividends to the extent of our current or accumulated earnings and profits, as determined under U.S. federal income tax principles. Distributions in excess of those earnings and profits will be treated first as a nontaxable return of capital to the extent of the U.S. Holder's tax basis in our common shares (determined on a share-by-share basis), and thereafter as capital gain. Because we are not a U.S. corporation, U.S. Holders that are corporations will not be entitled to claim a dividends-received deduction with respect to any distributions they receive from us (provided, however, that a U.S. corporation that owns at least 10% of our shares may be able to claim a dividends-received-deduction and should consult its tax advisor).

Dividends paid on our common shares to a U.S. Holder who is an individual, trust or estate, or a "non-corporate U.S. Holder," will generally be treated as "qualified dividend income" that is taxable to such non-corporate U.S. Holder at preferential tax rates, provided that (1) our common shares are readily tradable on an established securities market in the United States (such as the NYSE, on which our common shares are traded); (2) we are not a PFIC for the taxable year during which the dividend is paid or the immediately preceding taxable year (which we do not believe we have been, are, or will be); (3) the non-corporate U.S. Holder 's holding period of our common shares includes more than 60 days in the 121-day period beginning 60 days before the date on which our common shares becomes ex-dividend; and (4) the non-corporate U.S. Holder is not under an obligation to make related payments with respect to positions in substantially similar or related property. A non-corporate U.S. Holder will be able to take qualified dividend income into account in determining its deductible investment interest (which is generally limited to its net investment income) only if it elects to do so; in such case, the dividend will be taxed at ordinary income rates. Non-corporate U.S. Holders also may be required to pay a 3.8% surtax on all or part of such holder's "net investment income," which includes, among other items, dividends on our shares, subject to certain limitations and exceptions. Investors are encouraged to consult their own tax advisors regarding the effect, if any, of this surtax on their ownership of our shares.

Amounts taxable as dividends generally will be treated as passive income from sources outside the U.S. However, if (a) we are 50% or more owned, by vote or value, by U.S. Holders and (b) at least 10% of our earnings and profits are attributable to sources within the U.S., then for foreign tax credit purposes, a portion of our dividends would be treated as derived from sources within the U.S. With respect to any dividend paid for any taxable year, the U.S. source ratio of our dividends for foreign tax credit purposes would be equal to the portion of our earnings and profits from sources within the U.S. for such taxable year divided by the total amount of our earnings and profits for such taxable

Table of Contents

year. The rules related to U.S. foreign tax credits are complex and U.S. Holders should consult their tax advisors to determine whether and to what extent a credit would be available.

Special rules may apply to any "extraordinary dividend" — generally, a dividend in an amount which is equal to or in excess of 10% of a shareholder's adjusted basis (or fair market value in certain circumstances) in a share of our common shares — paid by us. If we pay an "extraordinary dividend" on our common shares that is treated as "qualified dividend income", then any loss derived by a non-corporate U.S. Holder from the sale or exchange of such common shares will be treated as long-term capital loss to the extent of such dividend.

Non-U.S. Holders generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax on dividends received from us on our common shares unless the income is effectively connected with the conduct by the Non-U.S. Holder of a trade or business in the United States (“effectively connected income”) (and, if an applicable income tax treaty so provides, the dividends are attributable to a permanent establishment maintained by the Non-U.S. Holder in the U.S.). Effectively connected income (or, if an income tax treaty applies, income attributable to a permanent establishment maintained in the U.S.) generally will be subject to regular U.S. federal income tax in the same manner discussed above relating to taxation of U.S. Holders. In addition, earnings and profits of a corporate Non-U.S. Holder that are attributable to such income, as determined after allowance for certain adjustments, may be subject to an additional branch profits tax at a rate of 30%, or at a lower rate as may be specified by an applicable income tax treaty. Non-U.S. Holders may be subject to tax in jurisdictions other than the United States on dividends received from us on our common shares.

Dividends paid on our common shares to a non-corporate U.S. Holder may be subject to U.S. federal backup withholding tax if the non-corporate U.S. Holder:

fails to provide us with an accurate taxpayer identification number;

is notified by the IRS that they have become subject to backup withholding because they previously failed to report all interest or dividends required to be shown on their federal income tax returns; or

fails to comply with applicable certification requirements.

A holder that is not a U.S. Holder or a partnership may be subject to U.S. federal backup withholding with respect to such dividends unless the holder certifies that it is a non-U.S. person, under penalties of perjury, or otherwise establishes an exemption therefrom. Backup withholding tax is not an additional tax. Holders generally may obtain a refund of any amounts withheld under backup withholding rules that exceed their income tax liability by timely filing a refund claim with the IRS.

You are encouraged to consult your own tax advisor concerning the overall tax consequences arising in your own particular situation under U.S. federal, state, local, or foreign law from the payment of dividends on our common stock.

Cash Flow

Net cash provided by operating activities for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2018~~2019 was ~~$43.4~~$28.8 million as compared to ~~$3.7~~$43.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017.~~2018. Included in the net loss during the nine months ended September 30, 2019 were $26.1 million of non-cash impairment charges, a gain of $0.6 million arising from the sale of the Genco Vigour, $0.9 million of non-cash lease expense and a loss of $0.2 million related to the non-cash impairment of our right-of-use operating lease asset. Included in the net loss during the nine months ended September 30, 2018 were $56.6 million of non-cash impairment charges, as well as a $4.5 million loss on the extinguishment of debt, a gain of $1.5 million arising from the sale of two vessels and a $5.3 million payment on the $400 Million Credit Facility and gains totaling $1.5 million arising from the sale of vessels due to the sale of two vessels. Included in the net loss during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 were $22.0 million of non-cash impairment charges, as well as paid in kind interest incurred of $4.6 million related to the $400 Million Credit Facility and a gain on sale of vessels in the amount of $7.7 million due to the sale of five vessels.Facility. Depreciation and amortization expense for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2018 decreased~~2019 increased by ~~$3.6~~$3.9 million primarily due to the revaluation of nine of our vessels that were written down to their estimated fair market value during the first quarter of 2018, as well as the revaluation of six of our vessels that were written down to their estimated fair market value during the second and third quarters of 2017. These decreases in depreciation were partially offset by an increase in depreciation expense for the six vessels delivered during the third quarter of ~~2018.~~2018, partially offset by a decrease in depreciation expense for the eight vessels that were sold during the second half of 2018 and the first quarter of 2019. Additionally, ~~the fluctuation in inventories increased by $12.8 million due to additional fuel inventory for our vessels as the result of the employment of our vessels on spot market voyage charters. There~~there was ~~also a $5.8~~an $8.2 million increase in the fluctuation in due from charterers due to the timing of payments received from ~~charterers.~~charterers and a $5.3 million increase in the fluctuation in prepaid expenses and other current assets due to the timing of payments. Lastly, there was a $21.2 million increase in the

Table of Contents

fluctuation in inventories associated with vessels on spot market voyage charters. These ~~changes~~increases were partially offset by a ~~$5.5~~$9.7 million ~~decrease~~increase in deferred drydocking costs ~~incurred because~~as there were ~~less~~more vessels that completed drydocking during the nine months ended September 30, ~~2018~~2019 as compared to the same period during ~~2017. Lastly, there~~2018. There was ~~an increase~~also a $5.1 million and $3.1 million decrease in

~~Table of Contents~~

the fluctuation inof deferred revenue and accounts payable and accrued expenses, ~~of $7.4 million and an increase in the fluctuation in deferred revenue of $3.9 million~~respectively, due to the timing of ~~payments.~~payments made.

Net cash used in investing activities was $31.8 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2019 as compared to $226.5 million during the nine months ended September 30, ~~2018 as compared to net~~2018. Net cash ~~provided by~~used in investing activities ~~of $15.8 million~~ during the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017.~~ 2019 consisted primarily of $24.7 million purchase of scrubbers for our vessels, $10.4 million purchase of vessels related primarily to ballast water treatment systems and $3.6 million for the purchase of other fixed assets due to the purchase of vessel equipment. These cash outflows during the nine months ended September 30, 2019 were partially offset by $6.3 million of proceeds from the sale of one vessel during the first half of 2019. Net cash used in investing activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2018 consisted primarily of $239.7 million purchase of vessels related to the six vessels that delivered to us during the third quarter of 2018. This cash outflow during the nine months ended September 30, 2018 was partially offset by $10.6 million proceeds from the sale of two vessels during the third quarter of 2018 and $3.5 million of proceeds received for hull and machinery claims related primarily to the receipt of the remaining insurance settlement for the main engine repair claim for the Genco Tiger. Net cash provided by investing activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 consisted primarily of $15.5 million proceeds from the sale of five vessels during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and $0.7 million of proceeds received for various hull and machinery claims.

Net cash ~~provided by~~used in financing activities during the nine months ended September 30, ~~2018~~2019 was ~~$144.2~~$33.5 million as compared to net cash ~~used in~~provided by financing activities of ~~$3.5~~$144.2 million during the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017.~~2018. Net cash used in financing activities of $33.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 consisted primarily of the following: $49.6 million repayment of debt under the $495 Million Credit Facility; $4.7 million repayment of debt under the $108 Million Credit Facility; $0.6 million payment of deferred financing costs; and $0.1 million payment of common stock issuance costs. These cash outflows were partially offset by total drawdowns of $21.5 million under the $495 Million Credit Facility during the nine months ended September 30, 2019. Net cash provided by financing activities of $144.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 consisted primarily of the ~~$460.0~~$460.0 million drawdown on the $460 Million Credit Facility, the $108.0 million drawdown on the $108 Million Credit Facility and the net proceeds from the issuance of common stock on June 19, 2018 of $109.8 million partially offset by the following: $399.6 million repayment of debt under the $400 Million Credit Facility; $93.9 million repayment of debt under the $98 Million Credit Facility; $25.5 million repayment of debt under the 2014 Term Loan Facilities; $11.5 million payment of deferred financing costs; and $3.0 million payment of debt extinguishment ~~costs.~~costs. On August 14, 2018, we entered into the $108 Million Credit Facility to finance a portion of the purchase price for the six vessels acquired during the ~~three months ended September 30,~~third quarter of 2018. On June 5, 2018, the ~~$460~~$495 Million Credit Facility refinanced the following three existing credit ~~facilities;~~facilities with its original $460 million tranche; the $400 Million Credit Facility, the $98 Million Credit Facility and the 2014 Term Loan Facilities. ~~Net cash used in financing activities~~Additionally, on February 28, 2019, the $495 Million Credit Facility was amended to add a tranche of ~~$3.5~~$35 million for the ~~nine months ended September 30, 2017 consisted~~purchase of scrubbers in addition to the ~~following: $2.1~~original $460 million ~~repayment of debt under~~tranche used for the ~~2014 Term Loan Facilities; $1.1 million payment of Series A Preferred Stock issuance costs; and $0.3 million repayment of debt under the $400 Million Credit Facility.~~refinancing on June 5, 2018.

Credit Facilities

Refer to Note 7 — Debt in our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for information regarding our current credit facilities, including the underlying financial and non-financial covenants. We entered into the $108 Million Credit Facility on August 14, 2018 to finance a portion of the purchase price for the six vessels that were purchased during the third quarter of 2018. Additionally, we entered into the ~~$460~~$495 Million Credit Facility on May 31, 2018, which was initially used to refinance our prior credit facilities: the $400 Million Credit Facility, the $98 Million Credit Facility and the 2014 Term Loan Facilities on June 5, 2018. On February 28, 2019, we entered into an amendment to the $495 Million Credit Facility, which provides for an additional tranche of up to $35 million to finance a portion of the acquisitions, installations, and related costs for exhaust cleaning systems (or “scrubbers”) for 17 of our Capesize vessels.

Table of Contents

Interest Rate Swap Agreements, Forward Freight Agreements and Currency Swap Agreements

At September 30, ~~2018~~2019 and December 31, ~~2017,~~2018, we did not have any interest rate swap agreements. As part of our business strategy, we may enter into interest rate swap agreements to manage interest costs and the risk associated with changing interest rates. In determining the fair value of interest rate derivatives, we would consider the creditworthiness of both the counterparty and ourselves immaterial. Valuations prior to any adjustments for credit risk would be validated by comparison with counterparty valuations. Amounts would not and should not be identical due to the different modeling assumptions. Any material differences would be investigated.

AsAs part of our business strategy, we may enter into arrangements commonly known as forward freight agreements, or FFAs, to hedge and manage our exposure to the charter market risks relating to the deployment of our ~~existing fleet of~~ vessels. ~~These arrangements may include future contracts, or commitments to perform in the future a shipping service between ship owners, charterers and traders.~~ Generally, these arrangements would bind us and each counterparty in the arrangement to buy or sell a specified tonnage freighting commitment “forward” at an agreed time and price and for a particular route. Upon settlement, if the contracted charter rate is less than the average of the rates (as reported by an identified index) for the specified route and period, the seller of the FFA is required to pay the buyer an amount equal to the difference between the contracted rate and the settlement rate multiplied by the number of days in the specific period. Conversely, if the contracted rate is greater than the settlement rate, the buyer is required to pay the seller the settlement sum. Although FFAs can be entered into for a variety of purposes, including for hedging, as an option, for

~~Table of Contents~~

trading or for arbitrage, if we decided to enter into FFAs, our objective would be to hedge and manage market risks as part of our commercial management. It is not currently our intention to enter into FFAs to generate a stream of income independent of the revenues we derive from the operation of our fleet of vessels. If we determine to enter into FFAs, we may reduce our exposure to any declines in our results from operations due to weak market conditions or downturns, but may also limit our ability to benefit economically during periods of strong demand in the market. We have not entered into any FFAs as of September 30, ~~2018~~2019 and December 31, ~~2017.~~2018.

Contractual Obligations

The following table sets forth our contractual obligations and their scheduled maturity dates as of September 30, ~~2018.~~2019. The table incorporates the employment agreement entered into in September 2007 with our Chief Executive Officer and President, John C. Wobensmith, ~~which was amended on March 23, 2017.~~as amended. The interest and borrowing fees and scheduled credit agreement payments below reflect the ~~$460~~$495 Million Credit Facility and the $108 Million Credit Facility, as well as other fees associated with the facilities. The following table also incorporates the future lease payments associated with the lease for our current ~~space.~~office space in New York. Refer to Note 13 — ~~Commitments and Contingencies~~Leases in our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further information regarding the terms of our current lease agreement. Lastly, the table incorporates the remaining contractual purchase obligations for the purchase of ballast water treatment systems for 4143 of our vessels and the contractual purchase obligations remaining for the purchase of scrubber equipment for 17 of our vessels, refer to “Capital Expenditures” ~~section~~ below for further information. All of our time charter-in agreements with third parties are less than twelve months and have not been included below.


			Less Than		One to		Three to						Less Than		One to		Three to
			One		Three		Five		More than				One		Three		Five		More than
	Total		Year (1)		Years		Years		Five Years		Total		Year (1)		Years		Years		Five Years
	(U.S. dollars in thousands)										(U.S. dollars in thousands)
Credit Agreements	$	568,000	$	16,580	$	132,640	$	132,640	$	286,140	$	518,605	$	16,172	$	143,838	$	358,595	$	—
Interest and borrowing fees		108,466		7,839		54,163		39,422		7,042		73,117		6,481		43,756		22,880		—
Vessel purchase obligations ~~(2)~~		16,680		817		13,500		2,363		—		11,861		4,177		6,128		1,556		—
Executive employment agreement		631		164		467		—		—		630		163		467		—		—
Office leases		16,148		557		4,460		4,460		6,671		13,917		557		4,460		4,608		4,292
Totals	$	709,925	$	25,957	$	205,230	$	178,885	$	299,853	$	618,130	$	27,550	$	198,649	$	387,639	$	4,292

(1)

Represents the three-month period ending December 31, ~~2018.~~

~~(2)~~

In September and October 2018, we entered into agreements for the purchase of ballast water treatment systems for 41 of our vessels, for which the contracted purchase price is reflected here. These agreements may be subject to cancelation by us for regulatory reasons.2019.

Table of Contents

Interest expense has been estimated using ~~2.29%~~1.82% based on one-month LIBOR plus the average applicable margin of 3.25% for the $460 million tranche of the $495 Million Credit Facility, 2.50% for the $35 million tranche of the $495 Million Credit facility and 2.50% for the $108 Million Credit Facility.

Capital Expenditures

We make capital expenditures from time to time in connection with our vessel acquisitions. ~~After the the sale~~Our fleet currently consists of ~~one Handymax and one Handysize vessel, our fleet will consist of 61~~56 drybulk vessels, including 17 Capesize drybulk carriers, ~~five~~two Panamax drybulk carriers, six Ultramax drybulk carriers, 20 Supramax drybulk carriers and 1311 Handysize drybulk carriers.

As previously announced, we have implemented a fuel efficiency upgrade program for certain of our vessels in an effort to generate fuel savings and increase the future earnings potential for these vessels. The upgrades have been successfully installed on 17 of our vessels in the aggregate during planned drydockings from 2014 to 2017.

Under U.S. Federal law and 33 CFR, Part 151, Subpart D, U.S. approved ~~ballast water treatment systems (“BWTS”)~~BWTS will be required to be installed in all vessels at the first out of water drydocking after January 1, 2016 if these vessels are to discharge ballast water inside 12 nautical miles of the coast of the U.S. U.S. authorities did not approve ballast water treatment systems until December 2016. Therefore, the U.S. Coast Guard (“USCG”) has granted us extensions for our vessels with 2016 drydocking deadlines until January 1, 2018; however, an alternative management system (“AMS”) may be installed in lieu. For example, in February 2015, the USCG added Bawat to the list of ballast water treatment systems that received AMS acceptance. An AMS is valid for five years from the date of required

~~Table of Contents~~

compliance with ballast water discharge standards, by which time it must be replaced by an approved system unless the AMS itself achieves approval. Furthermore, we received extensions for vessels drydocking in 2016 ~~which~~that allowed for further extensions to the vessels’ next scheduled drydockings in year 2021. Additionally, for our vessels that were scheduled to drydock in 2017 and 2018, the USCG has granted an extension that enables us to defer installation to the next scheduled out of water drydocking. Any newbuilding vessels that we acquire will have a USCG approved system or at least an AMS installed when the vessel is being built.

In addition, on September 8, 2016, the Ballast Water Management (“BWM”) Convention was ratified and had an original effective date of September 8, 2017. However, on July 7, 2017, the effective date of the BWM Convention was extended two years to September 8, 2019 for existing ships. This will require vessels to have a BWTS installed to coincide with the vessels’ next International Oil Pollution Prevention Certificate (“IOPP”) renewal survey after September 8, 2019. In order for a vessel to trade in U.S. waters, it must be compliant with the installation date as required by the USCG as outlined above.

During ~~September and October~~the second half of 2018, we entered into agreements for the purchase of BWTS for 4143 of our vessels. The cost of these systems will vary based on the size and specifications of each vessel and ifwhether the systems will be installed in China. Based on the contractual purchase price of the BWTS and the estimated installation fees, the Company estimates the cost of the systems to be approximately $0.8 million for Capesize, $0.5 million for Panamax, $0.5 million for Supramax and $0.5 million for Handysize vessels. These costs will be capitalized and depreciated over the remainder of the life of the ~~vessel, assuming the system the Company installs becomes approved by both the International Maritime Organization (“IMO”) and the USCG.~~vessel. We intend to fund the BWTS purchase price and installation fees using cash on hand.

Under maritime regulations due to take effect on January 1, 2020, ~~ships~~vessels such as ours will have to reduce sulfur emissions, for which the principal solutions are the use of scrubbers or buying fuel with low sulfur content. We ~~plan~~have entered into agreements to install scrubbers on our 17 Capesize ~~vessels with options for installation on an additional 15 minor bulk~~ vessels. The balance of our vessels are expected to consume compliant, low sulfur fuel, but we will continue to evaluate other options. We anticipate scrubber installation on the 17 Capesize vessels to be completed in 2019 and estimate that the cost of each scrubber, including installation, will be approximately $2$2.25 million per vessel, which may vary according to the specifications of our vessels and technical aspects of the installation, among other variables. These costs will be capitalized and depreciated over the remainder of the life of the vessel. This does not include any lost revenue associated with offhire days due to the installation of the scrubbers. ~~We are currently in discussions with lenders in regard~~During February 2019, we entered into an amendment to ~~scrubber financing and anticipate establishing~~our $495 Million Credit Facility for an additional tranche of up to $35 million to cover a ~~credit facility to finance a significant~~ portion of the ~~costs associated with~~expenses to the ~~scrubbers.~~acquisition and installation of scrubbers on our 17 Capesize vessels. We intend to fund the remainder of the costs with cash on hand. The estimated costs and off-hire days associated with the installation of the scrubbers are ~~not~~ included in the expenditure table below. For

Table of Contents

vessels for which we do not currently anticipate installing scrubbers on, we expect to incur additional costs in order to transition these vessels from high sulfur fuel to compliant, low sulfur fuel.

In addition to acquisitions that we may undertake in future periods, we will incur additional expenditures due to special surveys and drydockings for our fleet. We estimate our drydocking costs, including capitalized costs incurred during drydocking related to vessel assets and vessel equipment, BWTS costs, scrubber costs and scheduled off-hire days for our fleet through ~~2019~~2020 to be:

Year

Estimated Drydocking
Cost

Estimated BWTS
Cost

Estimated Off-hire
Days

(U.S. dollars in millions)

2018 (October 1 - December 31, 2018)

$
—

$
0.8 (2)

—

2019

$
22.9 (1)

$
14.0

732 (3)

~~(1)~~

Estimated drydocking costs during 2019 include $8.0 million of costs for vessels that could potentially be sold which were impaired during the year ended December 31, 2017 or during the nine months ended September 30, 2018.

~~(2)~~

~~The $0.8 million of estimated BWTS costs during 2018 represent the deposits for the BWTS for certain vessels expected to be drydocked during 2019.~~

~~Table of Contents~~

~~(3)~~

Estimated offhire days during 2019 include 210 days for vessels that could potentially be sold which were impaired during the year ended December 31, 2017 or during the nine months ended September 30, 2018.


Year	Estimated Drydocking Cost		Estimated BWTS Cost		Estimated Scrubber Cost		Estimated Off-hire Days
	(U.S. dollars in millions)

2019	$	6.0	$	1.6	$	13.5	423
2020	$	10.5	$	4.7	$	—	290

The costs reflected are estimates based on drydocking our vessels in China. Actual costs will vary based on various factors, including where the drydockings are actually performed. We expect to fund these costs with cash on ~~hand.~~hand (with the exception of certain scrubber costs as noted above). These costs do not include drydock expense items that are reflected in vessel operating ~~expenses and fuel efficiency upgrades as noted above.~~expenses.

Actual length of drydocking will vary based on the condition of the vessel, yard schedules and other factors. Higher repairs and maintenance expense during drydocking for vessels which are over 15 years old typically result in a higher number of off-hire days depending on the condition of the vessel.

During the nine months ended September 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017,~~2018, we incurred a total of ~~$2.2~~$12.0 million and ~~$7.7~~$2.2 million of drydocking costs, respectively, excluding costs incurred during drydocking that were capitalized to vessel assets or vessel equipment.

~~Three~~During the nine months ended September 30, 2019, we paid a total of $24.7 million in cash installments towards our scrubber program and drew down $21.5 million under the scrubber tranche under our $495 Million Credit Facility. We anticipate paying approximately $13.5 million of additional cash installments towards our scrubber program, for which we can draw down approximately $11.5 million under our $495 Million Credit Facility.

Seventeen vessels completed their respective drydockings during the nine months ended September 30, ~~2018. We~~2019. An additional seven of our vessels began their drydockings during the third quarter of 2019 and did not complete until the fourth quarter of 2019. In addition to these seven vessels, we estimate that ~~none~~nine more of our vessels will be drydocked during the remainder of ~~2018~~2019 and 3614 of our vessels will be drydocked during 2020.

To date, we have installed scrubbers on twelve of our vessels and expect to complete the installation on the remaining five vessels during the fourth quarter of 2019.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that are material to investors.

Inflation

Inflation has only a moderate effect on our expenses given current economic conditions. In the event that significant global inflationary pressures appear, these pressures would increase our operating, voyage, general and administrative, and financing costs.

Table of Contents

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

There have been no changes or updates to our critical accounting policies as disclosed in the ~~2017~~2018 10-K, with the exception of new lease accounting pronouncements adopted as of January 1, ~~2018.~~2019. Refer to “Recent accounting pronouncements” in Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies of our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, which is incorporated herein by reference, for further information.

Vessels and Depreciation

We record the value of our vessels at their cost (which includes acquisition costs directly attributable to the vessel and expenditures made to prepare the vessel for its initial voyage) less accumulated depreciation. We depreciate our drybulk vessels on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives, estimated to be 25 years from the date of initial delivery from the shipyard. Depreciation is based on cost less the estimated residual scrap value of $310/lwt based on the 15-year average scrap value of steel. An increase in the residual value of the vessels will decrease the annual depreciation charge over the remaining useful life of the vessels. Similarly, an increase in the useful life of a drybulk vessel would also decrease the annual depreciation charge. Comparatively, a decrease in the useful life of a drybulk vessel or in its residual value would have the effect of increasing the annual depreciation charge. However, when regulations place limitations over the ability of a vessel to trade on a worldwide basis, we will adjust the vessel’s useful life to end at the date such regulations preclude such vessel’s further commercial use.

The carrying value of each of our vessels does not represent the fair market value of such vessel or the amount we could obtain if we were to sell any of our vessels, which could be more or less. Under U.S. GAAP, we would not record a loss if the fair market value of a vessel (excluding its charter) is below our carrying value unless and until we

~~Table of Contents~~

determine to sell that vessel or the vessel is impaired as discussed in the ~~2017~~2018 10-K. ~~Excluding~~As of September 30, 2019, excluding the three Bourbon vessels we resold immediately upon delivery to MEP at our cost, we have sold 1521 of our vessels since our inception and realized a profit in each instance, with the exception of the Genco Marine which was scrapped on May 17, 2016, ~~and~~ the Genco Surprise which was sold during the third quarter of 2018, and the Genco Muse which was sold during the fourth quarter of 2018. ~~Additionally, we incurred a $53.8 million loss from the forfeiture of our deposit and related interest when we determined to cancel an acquisition of six drybulk newbuildings in November 2008.~~

During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019, we recorded losses of $12.2 million and $26.1 million, respectively, related to the impairment of vessel assets. There was $5.9 million of impairment expense recorded during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019 for the Genco Raptor. On November 4, 2019, we entered into an agreement to sell the Genco Raptor. As the anticipated undiscounted cash flows, including the net sales price, did not exceed the net book value of the vessel at September 30, 2019, the vessel value was adjusted to its net sales price as of September 30, 2019. During September 2019, we entered into an agreement to sell the Genco Thunder and the Genco Champion and the vessel values were written down to their net sales price as of September 30, 2019 which resulted in an impairment loss of $5.7 million and $0.6 million during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019. There was also $4.4 million of impairment expense recorded during the nine months ended September 30, 2019 for the Genco Challenger. On August 2, 2019, we entered into an agreement to sell the Genco Challenger. As the anticipated undiscounted cash flows, including the net sales price, did not exceed the net book value of the vessel at June 30, 2019, the vessel value was adjusted to its net sales price as of June 30, 2019. Lastly, at June 30, 2019, the Company determined that the expected estimated future undiscounted cash flows for the Genco Champion and the Genco Charger did not exceed the net book value of these vessels as of June 30, 2019. As such, the Company adjusted the value of these vessels to their respective fair market values as of June 30, 2019. This resulted in an impairment loss of $9.5 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2019.

During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018, we recorded losses of $0 and $56.6 million, respectively, related to the impairment of vessel assets. There was $0.2 million of impairment expense recorded during the nine months ended September 30, 2018 for the Genco Surprise. On July 24, 2018 we entered into an agreement to sell the Genco Surprise. As the anticipated undiscounted cash flows, including the net sales price, did not exceed the net book value of the vessel at June 30, 2018, the vessel value was adjusted to its net sales price as of June 30, 2018. Additionally, there was $56.4 million of impairment expense recorded during the nine months ended September 30, 2018 for nine of our vessels; the Genco Cavalier, the Genco Loire, the Genco Lorraine, the Genco Muse, the Genco Normandy, the Baltic Cougar, the Baltic Jaguar, the Baltic Leopard and the Baltic ~~Panther~~.Panther. On February 27, 2018, our

Table of Contents

Board of Directors determined to dispose of these vessels at times and on terms to be determined in the future. As such, the future undiscounted cash flows did not exceed the net book value of these vessels and the vessel values were adjusted to their respective fair market values which resulted in an impairment loss. ~~Refer to Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.~~

During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, we recorded loss of $18.7 million and $22.0 million, respectively, related to the impairment of vessel assets. There was $18.7 million of impairment expense recorded during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 for five of our vessels; the Genco Beauty, the Genco Explorer, the Genco Knight, the Genco Progress and the Genco Vigour. On August 4, 2017, the Board of Directors determined to dispose of these vessels at times and on terms to be determined in the future. As such, the future undiscounted cash flows did not exceed the net book value of these vessels and the vessel values were adjusted to their respective fair market values which resulted in an impairment loss. Additionally, at June 30, 2017, we determined that the future undiscounted cash flows did not exceed the net book value for the Genco Surprise; therefore, we adjusted the value of the Genco Surprise to its fair market value which resulted in an impairment loss of $3.3 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2017. Refer to Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.

Pursuant to our credit facilities, we regularly submit to the lenders valuations of our vessels on an individual charter free basis in order to evidence our compliance with the collateral maintenance covenants under our credit facilities. Such a valuation is not necessarily the same as the amount any vessel may bring upon sale, which may be more or less, and should not be relied upon as such. We were in compliance with the collateral maintenance covenant under our ~~$460~~$495 Million Credit Facility and $108 Million Credit Facility as of September 30, ~~2018.~~2019. Refer to Note 7 — Debt in our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further details. We obtained valuations for all of the vessels in our fleet pursuant to the terms of the ~~$460~~$495 Million Credit Facility and the $108 Million Credit Facility. In the chart below, we list each of our vessels, the year it was built, the year we acquired it, and its carrying value at September 30, ~~2018~~2019 and December 31, ~~2017.~~2018. Vessels have been grouped according to their collateralized status as of September 30, ~~2018.~~2019. The carrying value of the Genco ~~Cavalier,~~Raptor, Genco Thunder, Genco Challenger, Genco Champion and Genco Charger at September 30, 2019 reflect the impairment loss recorded during the nine months ended September 30, 2019. The carrying value of the Genco Loire, Genco Lorraine, ~~Genco Muse,~~ Genco Normandy, Baltic Cougar, Baltic Jaguar, Baltic Leopard and Baltic Panther at September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018 reflect the impairment loss recorded during 2018 for these vessels. The carrying value of the Genco ~~Beauty, Genco Explorer, Genco Knight and Genco~~ Vigour ~~at September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, and the carrying value of the Genco Surprise and Genco Progress~~ at December 31, ~~2017, reflect~~2018 reflects the impairment loss recorded during 2017 for ~~these vessels.~~this vessel.

At September 30, 2019, the vessel valuations of all of our vessels for covenant compliance purposes under our credit facilities as of the most recent compliance testing date were lower than their carrying values at September 30, 2019, with the exception of the Genco Raptor, Genco Thunder, Genco Challenger and Genco Champion, which were impaired during the nine months ended September 30, 2019 as noted above, and the Genco Weatherly. At December 31, 2018, the vessel valuations of all of our vessels for covenant compliance purposes under our credit facility as of the most recent compliance testing date were lower than their carrying values at ~~September 30,~~December 31, 2018, with the exception of the Baltic Lion, Genco Tiger, Genco Weatherly, eight of the nine vessels that were written down to their fair market value during the nine months ended September 30, 2018 as noted above (Genco Loire, Genco Lorraine, Genco Muse, Genco Normandy, Baltic Cougar, Baltic Jaguar, Baltic Leopard and Baltic Panther), and the remaining four of the six vessels that were written down to their fair market value during the year ended December 31, 2017 as noted above (~~Genco Beauty, Genco Explorer, Genco Knight,~~ and Genco ~~Vigour~~Vigour.~~). At December 31, 2017, the vessel~~

~~Table of Contents~~

valuations of all of our vessels for covenant compliance purposes under our credit facilities as of the most recent compliance testing date were lower than their carrying values at December 31, 2017, with the exception of the Baltic Lion, Genco Tiger and the six aforementioned vessels that were written down to their fair market value during the year ended December 31, 2017.

The amount by which the carrying value at September 30, ~~2018~~2019 of all of the vessels in our fleet, with the exception of the 15four aforementioned vessels, exceeded the valuation of such vessels for covenant compliance purposes ranged, on an individual vessel basis, from ~~$0.1~~$0.3 million to ~~$12.6~~$16.6 million per vessel, and ~~$276.2~~$367.5 million on an aggregate fleet basis. The amount by which the carrying value at December 31, ~~2017~~2018 of all of the vessels in our fleet, with the exception of the ~~eight~~four aforementioned vessels, exceeded the valuation of such vessels for covenant compliance purposes ranged, on an individual vessel basis, from ~~$3.7~~$1.1 million to ~~$15.2~~$14.9 million per vessel, and ~~$395.5~~$336.3 million on an aggregate fleet basis. The average amount by which the carrying value of our vessels exceeded the valuation of such vessels for covenant compliance purposes was ~~$5.6~~$6.9 million at September 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~$7.6~~$6.1 million as of December 31, ~~2017.~~2018. However, neither such valuation nor the carrying value in the table below reflects the value of long-term time charters, if any, related to some of our vessels.

Carrying Value (U.S.

dollars in

thousands) as of




Year

September 30,

December 31,

Vessels

Year Built

Acquired

2018

2017

$460 Million Credit Facility

Genco Commodus

2009

2009

38,728

40,191

Genco Maximus

2009

2009

38,790

40,241

Genco Claudius

2010

2009

40,699

42,211

Baltic Bear

2010

2010

40,185

41,644

Baltic Wolf

2010

2010

40,350

41,780

Baltic Lion

2009

2013

31,123

32,063

Genco Tiger

2010

2013

29,007

29,870

Genco Raptor

2007

2008

16,324

17,019

Genco Thunder

2007

2008

16,398

17,080

Baltic Scorpion

2015

2015

26,912

27,708

Baltic Mantis

2015

2015

27,166

27,965

Genco Hunter

2007

2007

18,506

19,344

Genco Warrior

2005

2007

15,968

16,842

Genco Aquitaine

2009

2010

17,595

18,267

Genco Ardennes

2009

2010

17,617

18,285

Genco Auvergne

2009

2010

17,807

18,475

Genco Bourgogne

2010

2010

18,648

19,346

Genco Brittany

2010

2010

18,671

19,365

Genco Languedoc

2010

2010

18,682

19,375

Genco Loire

2009

2010

10,835

17,646

Genco Lorraine

2009

2010

10,832

17,620

Genco Normandy

2007

2010

9,244

16,068

Baltic Leopard

2009

2009

10,839

17,679

Baltic Jaguar

2009

2010

10,843

17,716

Baltic Panther

2009

2010

10,841

17,690

Baltic Cougar

2009

2010

10,842

17,705

Genco Picardy

2005

2010

16,026

16,886

Genco Provence

2004

2010

15,020

15,855

Genco Pyrenees

2010

2010

18,625

19,333

Genco Rhone

2011

2011

19,760

20,460

Genco Bay

2010

2010

17,508

18,172

Genco Ocean

2010

2010

17,572

18,226

Genco Avra

2011

2011

18,603

19,271


			Carrying Value (U.S.
			dollars in
			thousands) as of
		Year	September 30,		December 31,
Vessels	Year Built	Acquired	2019		2018
$495 Million Credit Facility
Genco Commodus	2009	2009	$	39,982	$	38,389
Genco Maximus	2009	2009		39,927		38,423
Genco Claudius	2010	2009		41,767		40,376
Baltic Bear	2010	2010		41,414		39,866
Baltic Wolf	2010	2010		41,146		39,989
Baltic Lion	2009	2013		31,540		30,870
Genco Tiger	2010	2013		29,400		28,716
Genco Raptor	2007	2008		9,996		16,096
Genco Thunder	2007	2008		10,213		16,173

6561

Table of Contents

Carrying Value (U.S.

dollars in

thousands) as of




Year

September 30,

December 31,

Vessels

Year Built

Acquired

2018

2017

Genco Mare

2011

2011

18,638

19,300

Genco Spirit

2011

2011

18,690

19,343

Genco Challenger

2003

2007

9,746

10,365

Baltic Wind

2009

2010

16,575

17,224

Baltic Cove

2010

2010

17,514

18,176

Baltic Breeze

2010

2010

17,600

18,247

Baltic Fox

2010

2013

17,096

17,766

Baltic Hare

2009

2013

16,072

16,722

Genco Constantine

2008

2008

36,419

37,963

Genco Augustus

2007

2007

34,144

35,683

Genco London

2007

2007

33,576

34,958

Genco Titus

2007

2007

33,699

35,076

Genco Tiberius

2007

2007

34,085

35,616

Genco Hadrian

2008

2008

36,484

37,900

Genco Predator

2005

2007

15,994

16,862

Genco Cavalier

2007

2008

9,275

16,011

Genco Champion

2006

2008

12,532

13,179

Genco Charger

2005

2007

11,663

12,285

Baltic Hornet

2014

2014

25,374

26,146

Baltic Wasp

2015

2015

25,625

26,398

TOTAL

$
1,127,367

$
1,222,618

$108 Million Credit Facility

Genco Endeavour

2015

2018

45,587

—

Genco Resolute

2015

2018

45,591

—

Genco Columbia

2016

2018

27,609

—

Genco Weatherly

2014

2018

22,743

—

Genco Liberty

2016

2018

49,116

—

Genco Defender

2016

2018

49,064

—

$
239,710

$
—

Unencumbered

Genco Beauty

1999

2005

5,755

6,075

Genco Explorer

1999

2004

3,721

3,874

Genco Knight

1999

2005

5,726

6,065

Genco Muse

2001

2005

7,384

11,459

Genco Progress

1999

2005

—

3,873

Genco Surprise

1998

2006

—

5,536

Genco Vigour

1999

2004

5,761

6,077

TOTAL

$
28,347

$
42,959

Consolidated Total

$
1,395,424

$
1,265,577


			Carrying Value (U.S.
			dollars in
			thousands) as of
		Year	September 30,		December 31,
Vessels	Year Built	Acquired	2019		2018
Baltic Scorpion	2015	2015		25,852		26,648
Baltic Mantis	2015	2015		26,104		26,897
Genco Hunter	2007	2007		17,401		18,223
Genco Warrior	2005	2007		15,152		15,674
Genco Aquitaine	2009	2010		17,281		17,436
Genco Ardennes	2009	2010		17,306		17,466
Genco Auvergne	2009	2010		17,224		17,582
Genco Bourgogne	2010	2010		17,803		18,420
Genco Brittany	2010	2010		17,826		18,444
Genco Languedoc	2010	2010		17,840		18,448
Genco Loire	2009	2010		10,907		10,773
Genco Lorraine	2009	2010		10,880		10,769
Genco Normandy	2007	2010		8,823		9,134
Baltic Leopard	2009	2009		10,824		10,779
Baltic Jaguar	2009	2010		10,677		10,785
Baltic Panther	2009	2010		10,912		10,782
Baltic Cougar	2009	2010		10,916		10,784
Genco Picardy	2005	2010		14,959		15,736
Genco Provence	2004	2010		14,415		14,809
Genco Pyrenees	2010	2010		17,763		18,395
Genco Rhone	2011	2011		18,843		19,532
Genco Bay	2010	2010		16,632		17,284
Genco Ocean	2010	2010		16,712		17,356
Genco Avra	2011	2011		17,730		18,378
Genco Mare	2011	2011		17,767		18,420
Genco Spirit	2011	2011		17,832		18,470
Genco Challenger	2003	2007		5,183		9,543
Baltic Wind	2009	2010		16,217		16,427
Baltic Cove	2010	2010		16,711		17,296
Baltic Breeze	2010	2010		16,822		17,382
Baltic Fox	2010	2013		16,218		16,876
Baltic Hare	2009	2013		15,617		15,910
Genco Constantine	2008	2008		35,835		36,086
Genco Augustus	2007	2007		33,583		33,747
Genco London	2007	2007		33,038		33,152
Genco Titus	2007	2007		33,142		33,235
Genco Tiberius	2007	2007		33,458		33,756
Genco Hadrian	2008	2008		37,019		36,139
Genco Predator	2005	2007		14,916		15,701
Genco Champion	2006	2008		6,423		12,314
Genco Charger	2005	2007		6,521		11,453
Baltic Hornet	2014	2014		24,346		25,114
Baltic Wasp	2015	2015		24,601		25,370
TOTAL			$	1,071,416	$	1,105,823

$108 Million Credit Facility
Genco Endeavour	2015	2018		46,317		45,368
Genco Resolute	2015	2018		46,337		45,497
Genco Columbia	2016	2018		26,896		27,702
Genco Weatherly	2014	2018		21,909		22,564

Table of Contents


			Carrying Value (U.S.
			dollars in
			thousands) as of
		Year	September 30,		December 31,
Vessels	Year Built	Acquired	2019		2018
Genco Liberty	2016	2018		49,756		48,930
Genco Defender	2016	2018		49,929		48,986
			$	241,144	$	239,047

Unencumbered
Genco Vigour	1999	2004		—		5,699
TOTAL			$	—	$	5,699

Consolidated Total			$	1,312,560	$	1,350,569

If we were to sell a vessel or hold a vessel for sale, and the carrying value of the vessel were to exceed its fair market value, we would record a loss in the amount of the difference. Refer to Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Note 4 — Vessel Acquisitions and Dispositions in our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for information regarding the sale of vessel assets and the classification of the vessel assets held for sale as of September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018.

~~Table of Contents~~

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Interest rate risk

We are exposed to the impact of interest rate changes. Our objective is to manage the impact of interest rate changes on our earnings and cash flow in relation to our borrowings. At September 30, ~~2018~~2019 and December 31, ~~2017,~~2018, we did not have any interest rate swap agreements to manage interest costs and the risk associated with changing interest rates.

We are subject to market risks relating to changes in LIBOR rates because we have significant amounts of floating rate debt outstanding. During the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017,~~2018, we were subject to the following interest rates on the outstanding debt under our credit ~~facilities:~~facilities (Refer to Note 7 — Debt of our condensed consolidated financial statements for further information):

$108 Million Credit Facility –— one-month LIBOR plus 2.50% effective during the ~~three months ended September 30,~~third quarter of 2018. We drew down $51.8 million on August 17, 2018, $22.1 million on September 6, 2018 and $34.1 million on September 11, 2018.

$~~460~~495 Million Credit Facility —

$460 Million Tranche - one-month LIBOR plus 3.25% effective June 5, 2018, when the initial $460 million draw down on this tranche of this facility was ~~made~~made. The applicable margin was reduced to 3.00% from March 5, 2019 to August 9, 2019 pursuant to terms of the facility.

$35 Million Tranche – one-month LIBOR plus 2.50% effective August 28, 2019 when the initial draw down on this tranche of this facility was made.

$400 Million Credit Facility — three-month LIBOR plus 3.75% until June 5, 2018, when this credit facility was refinanced with the ~~$460~~$495 Million Credit Facility

$98 Million Credit Facility — three-month LIBOR plus 6.125% until June 5, 2018, when this credit facility was refinanced with the ~~$460~~$495 Million Credit Facility

Table of Contents

2014 Term Loan Facilities — three-month or six-month LIBOR plus 2.50% until June 5, 2018, when this credit facility was refinanced with the ~~$460~~$495 Million Credit Facility

A 1% increase in LIBOR would result in an increase of ~~$3.8~~$4.0 million in interest expense for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2018.~~2019.

Derivative financial instruments

As part of our business strategy, we may enter into interest rate swap agreements to manage interest costs and the risk associated with changing interest rates. As of September 30, ~~2018~~2019 and December 31, ~~2017,~~2018, we did not have any derivative financial instruments.

Refer to “Interest rate risk” section above for further information regarding interest rate swap agreements.

Currency and exchange rates risk

The majority of transactions in the international shipping industry are denominated in U.S. Dollars. Virtually all of our revenues and most of our operating costs are in U.S. Dollars. We incur certain operating expenses in currencies other than the U.S. dollar, and the foreign exchange risk associated with these operating expenses is immaterial.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

EVALUATION OF DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and President and our Chief Financial Officer, we have evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our

~~Table of Contents~~

disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and President and our Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective.

CHANGES IN INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act) during our most recent fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Table of Contents

PART ~~II:~~II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the factors discussed in Part I, “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in the ~~2017~~2018 10-K, which could materially affect our business, financial condition or future results. Below is ~~updated information for~~an update to the risk factor entitled, “WeDividends and share repurchases permitted under our credit facilities are subject to regulation and liability under environmental and operational safety laws that could require significant expenditures and affect our cash flows and net income and could subject us to increased liability under applicable law or regulation”certain limitations”:

~~In order~~

Future dividends are subject to ~~comply~~the discretion of our Board of Directors; dividends and share repurchases are limited under our credit facilities.

Our quarterly dividend policy and declaration and payment of dividends is subject to legally available funds, compliance with ~~regulations mandating a reduction~~law and contractual obligations and our Board of Directors’ determination that each declaration and payment is in ~~sulfur emissions from 3.5% currently to 0.5% as~~the best interest of the ~~beginning of 2020,~~Company and our shareholders. While we ~~intend~~have initiated this policy, there is no legal obligation to ~~install exhaust gas cleaning systems (“scrubbers”) on our 17 Capesize vessels with options for installation of scrubbers on an additional 15 minor bulk vessels. We estimate that~~continue paying dividends at the cost of each scrubber, including installation, will be approximately $2 million per vessel, which may vary according to the specifications of our vessels and technical aspects of the installation, among other variables. This does not include any lost revenue associated with offhire days due to the installation of the scrubbers. We expect the portion of our fleet on which we do not install scrubbers to consume compliant, low sulfur fuel beginning in 2020, but we will continue to evaluate other options. Low sulfur fuel is more expensive than standard marine fuel ~~containing 3.5% sulfur content~~ and may become more expensive or difficult to obtain as a result of increased demand. If the cost differential between low sulfur fuel and high sulfur fuel is significantly higher than anticipated, or if low sulfur fuel is not available at ports on certain trading routes, it may not be feasible or competitive to operate vessels on certain trading routes without installing scrubbers or without incurring deviation time to obtain compliant fuel. Scrubbers may not be available to be installed on such vessels at a favorable costsame rate or at all, and this policy may change in the future. Our declaration and payment of dividends is also subject to a number of conditions and restrictions as described below.

Under the terms of our $495 Million Credit Facility and our $108 Million Credit Facility, our payment of dividends or repurchases of our stock are subject to customary conditions. We may pay dividends or repurchase stock under these facilities to the extent our total cash and cash equivalents are greater than $100 million and 18.75% of our total indebtedness, whichever is higher; if we ~~seek them at~~cannot satisfy this condition, we are subject to a ~~later date. Conversely, if implementation~~limitation of 50% of consolidated net income for the quarter preceding such dividend payment or ~~enforcement of sulfur emissions regulations is delayed, or~~stock repurchase if the ~~cost differential between low sulfur fuel~~collateral maintenance test ratio is 200% or less for such quarter, for which purpose the full commitment of up to $35 million of our new scrubber tranche is assumed to be drawn. The declaration and ~~high sulfur fuel is significantly lower than anticipated, we may not realize the economic benefits or recover the cost of the scrubbers we plan to install. The occurrence~~payment of any dividend or any stock repurchase is subject to the discretion of our Board of Directors. The principal business factors that our Board of Directors expects to consider when determining the ~~foregoing events may have a material adverse effect on~~timing and amount of dividend payments or stock repurchases include our ~~business, results of operations, cash flows,~~earnings, financial condition, and cash requirements at the time. Marshall Islands law generally prohibits the declaration and payment of dividends or stock repurchases other than from surplus. Marshall Islands law also prohibits the declaration and payment of dividends or stock repurchases while a company is insolvent or would be rendered insolvent by the payment of such a dividend or such a stock repurchase.

We may incur other expenses or liabilities that would reduce or eliminate the cash available for distribution as dividends. We may also enter into new agreements or the Marshall Islands or another jurisdiction may adopt laws or regulations that place additional restrictions on our ability to pay dividends. If we decrease, suspend or terminate the payment of dividends, our stock price may decline. If we suspend or terminate dividends, the return on your investment would be limited to the price at which you could sell your shares.

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

On November 5, 2019, the Company entered into amendments to the dividend covenants in the credit agreements for its $495 Million Credit Facility and its $108 Million Credit Facility with the lenders party to these agreements. Under the dividend covenants as so amended, the Company may pay dividends subject to customary conditions to the extent its unrestricted cash and cash equivalents are equal to the greater of $100 million and 18.75% of total indebtedness as defined in the credit agreements, in each case both immediately before and after giving effect to such dividends. The Company may also still pay dividends subject to customary conditions and a limitation of 50% of consolidated net income for the quarter preceding such dividend payment if the collateral maintenance test ratio is 200% or less for such quarter, the full commitment of up to $35 million for the scrubber tranche is assumed to be drawn. The foregoing description of the amendments is qualified in its entirety by reference to such amendments, which are filed as Exhibits 10.2 and 10.3 to this report.

Table of Contents

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

The Exhibit Index attached to this report is incorporated into this Item 16 by reference.

6866

Table of Contents

EXHIBIT INDEX



Exhibit			Document

3.1			Second Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Genco Shipping & Trading Limited.(1)

3.2			Articles of Amendment to Genco Shipping & Trading Limited Second Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation, dated July 17, 2015.(2)

3.3			Articles of Amendment to Genco Shipping & Trading Limited Second Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation, ~~of Genco Shipping & Trading Limited,~~ dated ~~July 7,~~April 15, 2016.(3)

3.4			Articles of Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Genco Shipping & Trading Limited, dated ~~January 4, 2017.~~July 7, 2016.(4)

3.5			Articles of Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Genco Shipping & Trading Limited, dated January 4, 2017.(5)

3.6			Certificate of Designations of Rights, Preferences and Privileges of Series A Preferred Stock of Genco Shipping & Trading Limited, dated as of November 14, 2016.~~(5)~~(6)

~~3.6~~3.7			Amended and Restated By-Laws of Genco Shipping & Trading Limited, dated July 9, 2014.(1)

~~3.7~~3.8			Amendment to Amended and Restated By-Laws, dated June 4, 2018.~~(6)~~(7)

4.1			Form of Specimen Stock Certificate of Genco Shipping & Trading Limited.(1)

4.2			Form of Specimen Warrant Certificate of Genco Shipping & Trading Limited.(1)

10.1			UpLetter Agreement dated August 7, 2019 between Genco Shipping & Trading Limited and John C. Wobensmith.(8)

10.2			Second Amendment to ~~US$108,000,000 Senior Secured~~Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated ~~August 14, 2018,~~as of November 5, 2019, by and among Genco Shipping & Trading Limited, ~~as Borrower,~~ the ~~lenders~~Subsidiary Guarantors party thereto, ~~from time~~the Lenders party thereto, and Nordea Bank ABP, New York Branch, as Administrative Agent and Security Agent.(*)

10.3			Second Amendment to ~~time, Crédit Agricole Corporate~~Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of November 5, 2019, by and among Genco Shipping & ~~Investment Bank, as Structurer and Bookrunner, Crédit Agricole Corporate & Investment Bank and Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken AB (Publ) as Mandated Lead Arrangers~~Trading Limited, the Subsidiary Guarantors party thereto, the Lenders party thereto, and Crédit Agricole Corporate &And Investment Bank, as Administrative Agent and as Security ~~Agent (6)~~Agent.(*)

31.1			Certification of Chief Executive Officer and President pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.(*)

31.2			Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.(*)

32.1			Certification of Chief Executive Officer and President pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.(*)

32.2			Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.(*)

Table of Contents

101

The following materials from Genco Shipping & Trading Limited’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, ~~2018~~2019 formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, ~~2018~~2019 and December 31, ~~2017~~2018 (Unaudited), (ii) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017~~2018 (Unaudited), (iii) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive (Loss) Income ~~(Loss)~~ for the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017~~2018 (Unaudited), (iv) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Equity for the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017~~2018 (Unaudited), (v) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017~~2018 (Unaudited), and (vi) Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited).(*)



(*)	Filed with this report.

(1)	Incorporated by reference to Genco Shipping & Trading Limited’s Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 15, 2014.

~~Table of Contents~~

(2)	Incorporated by reference to Genco Shipping & Trading Limited’s Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 17, 2015.

(3)	Incorporated by reference to Genco Shipping & Trading Limited’s Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 15, 2016.

(4)	Incorporated by reference to Genco Shipping & Trading Limited’s Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 7, 2016.

~~(4)~~(5)	Incorporated by reference to Genco Shipping & Trading Limited’s Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 4, 2017.

~~(5)~~(6)	Incorporated by reference to Genco Shipping & Trading Limited’s Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 15, 2016.

~~(6)~~(7)	Incorporated by reference to Genco Shipping & Trading Limited’s Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 5, 2018.

(8)	Incorporated by reference to Genco Shipping & Trading Limited’s Report on Form 10-Q, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August ~~15, 2018.~~9, 2019.

7068

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	GENCO SHIPPING & TRADING LIMITED


DATE: November 7, ~~2018~~2019	By:		/s/ John C. Wobensmith
	John C. Wobensmith
	Chief Executive Officer and President
	(Principal Executive Officer)


DATE: November 7, ~~2018~~2019	By:	/s/ Apostolos Zafolias
	Apostolos Zafolias
	Chief Financial Officer
	(Principal Financial Officer)

7169





	Series A				Additional
	Preferred		Common		Paid-in		Retained
	Stock		Stock		Capital		Deficit		Total Equity
Balance — January 1, 2018	$	—	$	345	$	1,628,355	$	(654,332)	$	974,368

Net loss								(51,224)		(51,224)

Issuance of 7,015,000 shares of common stock				70		109,593				109,663

Nonvested stock amortization						1,776				1,776

Balance — September 30, 2018	$	—	$	415	$	1,739,724	$	(705,556)	$	1,034,583


	As Reported		As Adjusted
	September 30,		September 30,		Effect of
	2017		2017		Change
Cash Flow Data:
Net cash provided by operating activities (1)	$	4,439	$	3,721	$	718
Net cash provided by investing activities (1)		15,063		15,781		(718)


	As of September 30, 2018
			Balance
			without Adoption
			of New Revenue		Effect of
	As Reported		Standard		Change
Assets
Current assets:
Due from charterers	$	18,536	$	20,974	$	(2,438)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		10,072		8,396		1,676

Liabilities and Equity
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	33,084	$	33,123	$	(39)
Deferred revenue		10,231		8,402		1,829

Equity:
Retained deficit	$	(705,556)	$	(703,004)	$	(2,552)


			New
	Balance at		Revenue		Balance at
	December 31,		Standard		January 1,
	2017		Adjustment		2018
Assets
Current assets:
Due from charterers	$	12,855	$	(647)	$	12,208
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		7,338		475		7,813

Liabilities and Equity
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	23,230	$	(6)	$	23,224
Deferred revenue		4,722		493		5,215

Equity:
Retained deficit	$	(653,673)	$	(659)	$	(654,332)