Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act) Yes ¨ No x

As of ~~November 3, 2014,~~May 26, 2015, the registrant had ~~37,495,960~~37,610,923 outstanding shares of common stock, no par value.

The matters discussed in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, in our press releases and in our website-accessible conference calls with analysts and investor presentations include “forward-looking statements” about the plans, strategies, objectives, goals or expectations of SpartanNash Company and subsidiaries (“SpartanNash”). These forward-looking statements are identifiable by words or phrases indicating that SpartanNash or management “expects,” “anticipates,” “plans,” “believes,” or “estimates,” or that a particular occurrence or event “will,” “may,” “could,” “should” or “will likely” result, occur or be pursued or “continue” in the future, that the “outlook” or “trend” is toward a particular result or occurrence, that a development is an “opportunity,” “priority,” “strategy,” “focus,” that the Company is “positioned” for a particular result, or similarly stated expectations. Accounting estimates, such as those described under the heading “Critical Accounting Policies” in Part I, Item 2 of this Form 10-Q, are inherently forward-looking. Our asset impairment, restructuring cost provisions and fair value measurements are estimates and actual costs may be more or less than these estimates and differences may be material. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of the Quarterly Report, other report, release, presentation, or statement.

In addition to other risks and uncertainties described in connection with the forward-looking statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, SpartanNash’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the ~~transition period~~fiscal year ended ~~December 28, 2013~~January 3, 2015 (in particular, you should refer to the discussion of “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of our ~~Transition~~Annual Report on Form 10-K) and other periodic reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, there are many important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially.

Our ability to achieve sales and earnings expectations; improve operating results; realize benefits of the merger with Nash-Finch Company (including realization of synergies); maintain or strengthen our retail-store performance; assimilate acquired distribution centers and stores; maintain or grow sales; respond successfully to competitors including remodels and new openings; maintain or improve gross margin; effectively address food cost or price inflation or deflation; maintain or improve customer and supplier relationships; realize expected synergies from other acquisition activity; realize expected benefits of restructuring; realize growth opportunities; maintain or expand our customer base; reduce operating costs; sell on favorable terms assets held for sale; generate cash; continue to meet the terms of our debt covenants; continue to pay dividends, and successfully implement and realize the expected benefits of the other programs, initiatives, systems, plans, priorities, strategies, objectives, goals or expectations described in this Quarterly Report, our other reports, our press releases and our public comments will be affected by changes in economic conditions generally or in the markets and geographic areas that we serve, adverse effects of the changing food and distribution industries, adverse changes in government funded consumer assistance programs, possible changes in the military commissary system, including those stemming from the redeployment of forces, congressional action, changes in funding levels, or the effects of mandated reductions in or sequestration of government expenditures, and other factors.

This section is intended to provide meaningful cautionary statements. This should not be construed as a complete list of all economic, competitive, governmental, technological and other factors that could adversely affect our expected consolidated financial position, results of operations or liquidity. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to SpartanNash or that SpartanNash currently believes are immaterial also may impair its business, operations, liquidity, financial condition and prospects. We undertake no obligation to update or revise our forward-looking statements to reflect developments that occur or information obtained after the date of this Quarterly Report.

	October 4, 2014			December 28, 2013			April 25, 2015			January 3, 2015
Assets
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	8,048		$	9,216		$	8,475		$	6,443
Accounts and notes receivable, net		305,433			285,393			312,521			282,697
Inventories, net		612,901			589,497			562,979			577,197
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		34,093			38,423			26,397			31,882
Property and equipment held for sale		11,013			440			8,947			15,180
Total current assets		971,488			922,969			919,319			913,399

Property and equipment, net		596,294			628,482			579,825			597,150
Goodwill		297,352			299,186			297,280			297,280
Other assets, net		126,135			133,014			119,371			124,453

Total assets	$	1,991,269		$	1,983,651		$	1,915,795		$	1,932,282

Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity

Current liabilities
Accounts payable	$	411,279		$	365,584		$	349,893		$	320,037
Accrued payroll and benefits		64,307			81,175			58,800			73,220
Other accrued expenses		43,851			51,992			39,045			44,690
Deferred income taxes		22,987			18,706			28,086			22,494
Current maturities of long-term debt and capital lease obligations		7,349			7,345			19,019			19,758
Total current liabilities		549,773			524,802			494,843			480,199

Long-term liabilities
Deferred income taxes		91,602			86,750			89,766			91,232
Postretirement benefits		18,855			22,009			16,734			23,701
Other long-term liabilities		37,261			44,898			41,608			39,387
Long-term debt and capital lease obligations		549,530			598,319			516,237			550,510
Total long-term liabilities		697,248			751,976			664,345			704,830

Commitments and contingencies (Note 7)
Commitments and contingencies (Note 6)

Shareholders’ equity
Common stock, voting, no par value; 100,000 shares authorized; 37,625 and 37,371 shares outstanding		521,875			518,056
Common stock, voting, no par value; 100,000 shares authorized; 37,761 and 37,524 shares outstanding								524,741			520,791
Preferred stock, no par value, 10,000 shares authorized; no shares outstanding		—			—			—			—
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(8,375	)		(8,794	)		(11,486	)		(11,655	)
Retained earnings		230,748			197,611			243,352			238,117
Total shareholders’ equity		744,248			706,873			756,607			747,253

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	1,991,269		$	1,983,651		$	1,915,795		$	1,932,282

	12 Weeks Ended							40 Weeks Ended						16 Weeks Ended
	October 4,				October 12,			October 4,			October 12,			April 25,				April 19,
	2014				2013			2014			2013			2015				2014
Net sales	$	1,809,571			$	630,088		$	5,953,473		$	2,061,491		$	2,312,683			$	2,333,727
Cost of sales		1,548,162				499,627			5,079,612			1,625,890			1,976,437				1,986,389
Gross profit		261,409				130,461			873,861			435,601			336,246				347,338

Operating expenses
Selling, general and administrative		227,690				113,455			771,961			377,740			302,371				315,465
Merger transaction and integration		1,379				4,634			8,128			7,011
Merger integration and acquisition															2,684				4,168
Restructuring and asset impairment		(1,272	)			—			(67	)		2,220			7,338				127
Total operating expenses		227,797				118,089			780,022			386,971			312,393				319,760

Operating earnings		33,612				12,372			93,839			48,630			23,853				27,578

Other income and expenses
Interest expense		5,467				2,205			18,416			8,211			6,750				7,474
Debt extinguishment		—				—			—			2,762
Other, net		(1	)			(5	)		4			(20	)		(28	)			5
Total other income and expenses		5,466				2,200			18,420			10,953			6,722				7,479

Earnings before income taxes and discontinued operations		28,146				10,172			75,419			37,677			17,131				20,099
Income taxes		10,977				3,513			28,336			14,050			6,684				7,580
Earnings from continuing operations		17,169				6,659			47,083			23,627			10,447				12,519

Loss from discontinued operations, net of taxes		(73	)			(88	)		(358	)		(428	)		(120	)			(209	)
Net earnings	$	17,096			$	6,571		$	46,725		$	23,199		$	10,327			$	12,310

Basic earnings per share:
Earnings from continuing operations		0.46				0.30			1.25			1.08		$	0.28			$	0.33
Loss from discontinued operations		(0.01	)	*		—			(0.01	)		(0.02	)		(0.01	)	*		—		*
Net earnings		0.45				0.30			1.24			1.06		$	0.27			$	0.33

Diluted earnings per share:
Earnings from continuing operations	$	0.45			$	0.30		$	1.25		$	1.08		$	0.28			$	0.33
Loss from discontinued operations		—				—			(0.01	)		(0.02	)		(0.01	)	*		—		*
Net earnings	$	0.45			$	0.30		$	1.24		$	1.06		$	0.27			$	0.33

Weighted average shares outstanding:
Basic		37,717				21,876			37,678			21,820
Diluted		37,778				21,969			37,749			21,908

	12 Weeks Ended						40 Weeks Ended						16 Weeks Ended
	October 4,			October 12,			October 4,			October 12,			April 25,			April 19,
	2014			2013			2014			2013			2015			2014

Net earnings	$	17,096		$	6,571		$	46,725		$	23,199		$	10,327		$	12,310

Other comprehensive income, before tax
Pension and postretirement liability adjustment		203			336			678			845			272			271
Total other comprehensive income, before tax		203			336			678			845			272			271

Income tax benefit related to items of other comprehensive income		(78	)		(130	)		(259	)		(327	)
Income tax expense related to items of other comprehensive income														(103	)		(103	)

Total other comprehensive income, after tax		125			206			419			518			169			168
Comprehensive income	$	17,221		$	6,777		$	47,144		$	23,717		$	10,496		$	12,478

							Accumulated															Accumulated
							Other															Other
	Shares			Common			Comprehensive			Retained						Shares			Common			Comprehensive			Retained
	Outstanding			Stock			Income (Loss)			Earnings			Total			Outstanding			Stock			Income (Loss)			Earnings			Total
Balance – December 28, 2013		37,371		$	518,056		$	(8,794	)	$	197,611		$	706,873
Balance - January 3, 2015																	37,524		$	520,791		$	(11,655	)	$	238,117		$	747,253

Net earnings		—			—			—			46,725			46,725			—			—			—			10,327			10,327
Other comprehensive income		—			—			419			—			419			—			—			169			—			169
Dividends ($0.36 per share)		—			—			—			(13,588	)		(13,588	)
Dividends - $0.135 per share																	—			—			—			(5,092	)		(5,092	)
Share repurchase		(121	)		(2,492	)		—			—			(2,492	)		(79	)		(2,526	)		—			—			(2,526	)
Stock-based employee compensation		—			6,017			—			—			6,017			—			4,753			—			—			4,753
Issuances of common stock and related tax benefit on stock option exercises and stock bonus plan and from deferred compensation plan		145			1,393			—			—			1,393			115			2,336			—			—			2,336
Issuances of restricted stock and related income tax benefits		317			530			—			—			530			312			175			—			—			175
Cancellations of restricted stock		(87	)		(1,629	)		—			—			(1,629	)		(111	)		(788	)		—			—			(788	)

Balance – October 4, 2014		37,625		$	521,875		$	(8,375	)	$	230,748		$	744,248
Balance - April 25, 2015																	37,761		$	524,741		$	(11,486	)	$	243,352		$	756,607

	40 Weeks Ended						16 Weeks Ended
	October 4,			October 12,			April 25,			April 19,
	2014			2013			2015			2014
Cash flows from operating activities
Net earnings	$	46,725		$	23,199		$	10,327		$	12,310
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax		358			428			120			209
Earnings from continuing operations		47,083			23,627			10,447			12,519
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash
provided by operating activities:
Restructuring and asset impairment charges		(67	)		2,220
Convertible debt interest		—			379
Loss on debt extinguishment		—			2,762
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operating activities:
Non-cash restructuring and asset impairment charges								5,864			127
Depreciation and amortization		68,043			31,586			26,168			27,976
LIFO expense		5,077			413			1,723			1,972
Postretirement benefits expense		1,093			147			476			1,378
Deferred income taxes		3,640			(7,885	)
Deferred taxes on income								4,023			2,766
Stock-based compensation expense		6,017			2,865			4,753			3,929
Excess tax benefit on stock compensation		(651	)		(146	)		(174	)		(131	)
Other, net		(205	)		99			123			(106	)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		(18,629	)		(9,540	)		(30,205	)		(24,229	)
Inventories		(29,582	)		(5,857	)		12,495			29,511
Prepaid expenses and other assets		4,676			6,841			5,195			6,626
Accounts payable		59,079			11,245			31,346			(1,042	)
Accrued payroll and benefits		(17,021	)		(4,273	)		(13,812	)		(13,105	)
Postretirement benefit payments		(4,016	)		(252	)		(650	)		(3,623	)
Other accrued expenses and other liabilities		(7,152	)		1,906			(8,831	)		(11,973	)
Net cash provided by operating activities		117,385			56,137			48,941			32,595
Cash flows from investing activities
Purchases of property and equipment		(57,611	)		(28,784	)		(12,724	)		(22,839	)
Net proceeds from the sale of assets		5,368			115			9,670			1,804
Loans to customers		(4,915	)		—			(1,435	)		(2,050	)
Payments from customers on loans		2,864			—			500			1,041
Other		(68	)		(1,095	)		(534	)		(19	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(54,362	)		(29,764	)		(4,523	)		(22,063	)
Cash flows from financing activities
Proceeds from revolving credit facility		788,740			424,384			269,916			320,864
Payments on revolving credit facility		(831,688	)		(387,315	)		(301,949	)		(319,051	)
Share repurchase		(2,492	)		—			(2,526	)		—
Repurchase of convertible notes		—			(57,973	)
Repayment of other long-term debt		(5,836	)		(3,139	)		(2,979	)		(2,395	)
Financing fees paid		(479	)		(27	)		(1,845	)		(123	)
Excess tax benefit on stock compensation		651			146			174			131
Proceeds from sale of common stock		780			224			2,010			657
Dividends paid		(13,588	)		(5,679	)		(5,092	)		(4,533	)
Net cash used in financing activities		(63,912	)		(29,379	)		(42,291	)		(4,450	)
Cash flows from discontinued operations
Net cash used in operating activities		(279	)		(454	)		(95	)		(234	)
Net cash used in discontinued operations		(279	)		(454	)		(95	)		(234	)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents		(1,168	)		(3,460	)
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents								2,032			5,848
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		9,216			8,960			6,443			9,216
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	8,048		$	5,500		$	8,475		$	15,064

SpartanNash Company was formerly known as Spartan Stores, Inc. which began doing business under the assumed name of “SpartanNash Company,” upon completion of the merger with Nash-Finch Company (“Nash-Finch”) on November 19, 2013. The formal name change to SpartanNash Company was approved and became effective after the annual shareholders meeting on May 28, 2014. The accompanying unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (the “financial statements”) include the accounts of SpartanNash Company and its subsidiaries (“SpartanNash”). ~~The operating results of Nash-Finch are included in the financial statements for the year-to-date and third quarter ended October 4, 2014 only.~~ All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.

In connection with the merger with Nash-Finch, effective November 19, 2013, the Board of Directors of SpartanNash determined to change the Company’s fiscal year end from the last Saturday in March to the Saturday nearest to December 31, beginning with the transition period ended December 28, 2013. Beginning with fiscal 2014 the Company’s interim quarters consist of 12 weeks, except for the first quarter which consists of 16 weeks. As a result of this change, in these financial statements, including the notes thereto, financial results for the current third quarter and year-to-date ended October 4, 2014 are for 12 and 40 weeks, respectively. In addition, our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Earnings include an unaudited 12-week period and 40-week period ended October 12, 2013 and the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the prior year include an unaudited 40-week period ended October 12, 2013. The prior year financial statements were recast to the new fiscal year format based upon the original fiscal period end dates. As a result, the period end date for the prior year financial statements differs with the current year by one week and the full prior fiscal year will consist of 51 weeks with the fourth quarter comprised of only 11 weeks. Fiscal year 2014 will consist of 53 weeks with the fourth quarter comprised of 13 weeks.

In the opinion of management, the accompanying financial statements, taken as a whole, contain all adjustments, which are of a normal recurring nature, necessary to present fairly the financial position of SpartanNash as of ~~October 4, 2014,~~April 25, 2015, and the results of its operations and cash flows for the interim periods presented. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of results for a full year.

On April 7, 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2015-03 “Interest - Imputation of Interest: Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs.” ASU 2015-03 requires that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. The new guidance is effective on a retrospective basis for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, and interim periods within those years. Adoption of this standard in fiscal 2016 will retroactively decrease Other long-term assets and Long-term debt as of April 25, 2015 by approximately $9.9 million.

On April 10, 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) ~~No.~~ 2014-08 “Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity.” ASU ~~No.~~ 2014-08 ~~changes~~changed the criteria for reporting discontinued operations and ~~modifies~~modified related disclosure requirements. The ~~new guidance is effective on a prospective basis for~~Company adopted ASU 2014-08 in the first quarter of fiscal ~~years beginning after December 15, 2014, and interim periods within those years. The Company is currently assessing the potential impact~~2015. Adoption of ASU ~~No.~~ 2014-08 did not have a material impact on ~~its financial statements.~~the Consolidated Financial Statements.

On May 28, 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers,” which provides guidance for revenue recognition. The new guidance contained in the ASU affects any reporting organization that either enters into contracts with customers to transfer goods or services or enters into contracts for the transfer of nonfinancial assets unless those contracts are within the scope of other standards. The standard’s core principle is that a company will recognize revenue when it transfers promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. ~~This~~On April 29, 2015, the FASB issued a one-year deferral of the effective date of this new guidance, ~~will be~~which would result in the guidance being effective for the Company in the first quarter of its fiscal year ending December ~~30, 2017.~~29, 2018. Adoption is allowed by either the full retrospective or modified retrospective approach. The Company is currently in the process of evaluating the impact of adoption of this ~~ASU~~ASC on ~~the Company’s financial statements.~~

On November 19, 2013, Spartan Stores, Inc. completed a merger with Nash-Finch, a food distribution company serving military commissaries and exchanges and independent grocery retailers as well as an operator of retail grocery stores.

The merger was accounted for under the provisions of FASB Accounting Standards Codification Topic 805, “Business Combinations.” The related assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recorded at estimated fair values on the acquisition date.

The following table summarizes the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed on November 19, 2013. During the measurement period, which will end on November 18, 2014, net adjustments of $7.0 million have been made to the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed with a corresponding adjustment to goodwill. These adjustments are summarized in the table presented below. The accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 28, 2013 has been retrospectively adjusted to reflect these adjustments made as of November 19, 2013 as required by the accounting guidance for business combinations. The valuation process is not complete and the final determination of the fair values may result in further adjustments to the values presented below:

During the second quarter ended July 12, 2014, management of the Company made revisions to the cash flow projections to correct the allocation between certain reporting units related to the valuation analysis completed in 2013. Management has concluded that the purchase accounting effect of the revisions is not material to the consolidated financial statements for any period presented. As a result of the revisions, property and equipment was decreased by $23.0 million, while intangible assets were increased by $19.3 million and goodwill was increased by $3.7 million.

The excess of the purchase price over the fair value of net assets acquired of $36.6 million was preliminarily recorded as goodwill in the condensed consolidated balance sheet and allocated to the Food Distribution segment. The goodwill recognized is attributable primarily to expected synergies and the assembled workforce of Nash-Finch. No goodwill is expected to be deductible for tax purposes.

The following supplemental pro forma financial information presents sales and net earnings as if the Nash-Finch Company was acquired on the first day of the 40-week period ended October 12, 2013. This pro forma information is not necessarily indicative of the results that would have been obtained if the acquisition had occurred at the beginning of the 40-week period presented or that may be obtained in the future.

~~The following table reflects the components of amortized intangible assets, included in “Other, net” on the Condensed~~our Consolidated ~~Balance Sheets:~~Financial Statements.

~~The weighted average amortization period for amortizable intangible assets is as follows:~~

~~Estimated amortization expense for fiscal year 2014 through 2018 is as follows:~~

Indefinite-lived intangible assets that are not amortized consist primarily of trade names and licenses for the sale of alcoholic beverages which totaled $33.1 million and $33.2 million as of October 4, 2014 and December 28, 2013.

The following table provides the activity of restructuring costs for the 4016 weeks ended ~~October 4, 2014.~~April 25, 2015. Accrued restructuring costs recorded in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets are included in “Other accrued expenses” in Current liabilities and “Other long-term liabilities” in Long-term liabilities based on when the obligations are expected to be paid.

										Lease and
(In thousands)	Lease and Ancillary Costs			Severance			Total			Ancillary Costs				Severance				Total
Balance at December 28, 2013	$	19,496		$	1,035		$	20,531
Balance - January 3, 2015										$		13,988		$		80		$	14,068
Provision for lease and related ancillary costs, net of sublease income		236			—			236	(a)			6,760			—				6,760		(a)
Provision for severance		—			306			306	(b)		—					304			304		(b)
Changes in estimates		(1,436	)		—			(1,436	)(c)			(287	)		—				(287	)	(c)
Lease termination adjustment												(1,745	)		—				(1,745	)	(d)
Accretion expense		523			—			523				175			—				175
Payments		(5,378	)		(1,257	)		(6,635	)			(2,522	)			(284	)		(2,806	)
Balance at October 4, 2014	$	13,441		$	84		$	13,525
Balance - April 25, 2015										$		16,369		$		100		$	16,469

Included in the liability are lease obligations recorded at the present value of future minimum lease payments, calculated using a risk-free interest rate, and related ancillary costs from the date of closure to the end of the remaining lease term, net of estimated sublease income.

Restructuring and asset impairment charges included in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Earnings consisted of the following:

12 Weeks Ended

40 Weeks Ended

(In thousands)

October 4,
2014

October 12,
2013

October 4,
2014

October 12,
2013

Asset impairment charges (a)

$
—

$
—

$
906

$
2,220

Provision for leases and related ancillary costs, net of
sublease income, related to store closings (b)

—

—

236

—

Gains on sales of assets related to stores closed

(1,638
)

—

(2,636
)

—

Provision for severance (c)

40

—

306

—

Other costs associated with distribution center and
store closings

326

—

1,213

—

Changes in estimates (d)

—

—

(92
)

—

$
(1,272
)

$
—

$
(67
)

$
2,220

	16 Weeks Ended
	April 25,			April 19,
(In thousands)	2015			2014
Asset impairment charges	$	2,353		$		906		(a)
Provision for leases and related ancillary costs, net of sublease income, related to store closings		6,760				18		(b)
Gains on sales of assets related to closed facilities		(1,540	)			(1,318	)	(c)
Provision for severance		304				196		(d)
Other costs associated with distribution center and store closings		1,493				724
Changes in estimates		(287	)			(399	)	(e)
Lease termination adjustment		(1,745	)		—			(f)
	$	7,338		$		127

On January 9, 2015, SpartanNash Company and certain of its subsidiaries entered into an amendment (the “Amendment”) to the Company’s Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) with Wells Fargo Capital Finance, LLC, as administrative agent, and certain lenders to the Credit Agreement. The Amendment reduced the interest rates by 0.25% and extended the maturity date of the Loan Agreement from November 19, 2018 to January 9, 2020.

Financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents, accounts and notes receivable, accounts payable and long-term debt. The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, accounts and notes receivable, and accounts payable approximate fair value because of the short-term maturities of these financial instruments. At ~~October 4, 2014~~April 25, 2015 and ~~December 28, 2013~~January 3, 2015 the estimated fair value and the book value of our debt instruments were as follows:

(In thousands)	October 4, 2014		December 28, 2013		April 25, 2015		January 3, 2015
Book value of debt instruments:
Current maturities of long-term debt and capital lease obligations	$	7,349	$	7,345	$	19,019	$	19,758
Long-term debt and capital lease obligations		549,530		598,319		516,237		550,510
Total book value of debt instruments		556,879		605,664		535,256		570,268
Fair value of debt instruments		561,500		609,682		540,421		574,008
Excess of fair value over book value	$	4,621	$	4,018	$	5,165	$	3,740

The estimated fair value of debt is based on market quotes for instruments with similar terms and remaining maturities (level 2 valuation techniques).

ASC 820 prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into the following hierarchy:

Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2: Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly.

Level 3: Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, reflecting the reporting entity’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing.

Long-lived assets with a book value of $5.6 million and $0.9 million as of April 25, 2015 and ~~$3.6 million in the 40 week periods ended October 4,~~April 19, 2014, ~~and October 12, 2013,~~ respectively, were measured at a fair value of ~~$0.0~~$3.2 million and ~~$1.4~~$0.0 million, respectively, on a nonrecurring basis using Level 3 inputs as defined in the fair value hierarchy. Our accounting and finance team management, which report to the chief financial officer, determine our valuation policies and procedures. The development and determination of the unobservable inputs for level 3 fair value measurements and fair value calculations are the responsibility of our accounting and finance team management and are approved by the chief financial officer. Fair value of long-lived assets is determined by estimating the amount and timing of net future cash flows, discounted using a risk-adjusted rate of interest. SpartanNash estimates future cash flows based on experience and knowledge of the market in which the assets are located, and when necessary, uses real estate brokers. See Note 53 for discussion of long-lived asset impairment charges.

We are engaged from time-to-time in routine legal proceedings incidental to our business. We do not believe that these routine legal proceedings, taken as a whole, will have a material impact on our business or financial condition. While the ultimate effect of such actions cannot be predicted with certainty, management believes that their outcome will not result in ~~a material~~an adverse effect on the consolidated financial position, operating results or liquidity of SpartanNash.

On or about July 24, 2013, a putative class action complaint (the “State Court Action”) was filed in the District Court for the Fourth Judicial District, State of Minnesota, County of Hennepin (the “State Court”), by a stockholder of Nash-Finch Company in connection with the pending merger with Spartan Stores, Inc. The State Court Action was styled Greenblatt v. Nash-Finch Co. et al., Case No. 27-cv-13-13710. That complaint was amended on August 28, 2013, after Spartan Stores filed a registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission containing a preliminary version of the joint proxy statement/prospectus. On September 9, 2013, the defendants filed motions to dismiss the State Court Action. On or about September 19, 2013, a second putative class action complaint (the “Federal Court Action” and, together with the State Court Action, the “Putative Class Actions”) was filed in the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota (the “Federal Court”), by a stockholder of Nash-Finch. The Federal Court Action was styled Benson v. Covington et al., Case No. 0:13-cv-02574.

The Putative Class Actions alleged that the directors of Nash-Finch breached their fiduciary duties by, among other things, approving a merger that provided for inadequate consideration under circumstances involving certain alleged conflicts of interest; that the merger agreement included allegedly preclusive deal protection provisions; and that Nash-Finch and Spartan Stores allegedly aided and abetted the directors in breaching their duties to Nash-Finch’s stockholders. Both Putative Class Actions also alleged that the preliminary joint proxy statement/prospectus was false and misleading due to the omission of a variety of allegedly material information. The complaint in the Federal Court Action also asserted additional claims individually on behalf of the plaintiff under the federal securities laws. The Putative Class Actions sought, on behalf of their putative classes, various remedies, including enjoining the merger from being consummated in accordance with its agreed-upon terms, damages, and costs and disbursements relating to the lawsuit.

SpartanNash believed that these lawsuits were without merit; however, to eliminate the burden, expense and uncertainties inherent in such litigation, Nash-Finch and Spartan Stores agreed, as part of settlement discussions, to make certain supplemental disclosures in the joint proxy statement/prospectus requested by the Putative Class Actions in the definitive joint proxy statement/prospectus. On October 30, 2013, the defendants entered into the Memorandum of Understanding regarding the settlement of the Putative Class Actions. The Memorandum of Understanding outlined the terms of the parties’ agreement in principle to settle and release all claims which were or could have been asserted in the Putative Class Actions. In consideration for such settlement and release, Nash-Finch and Spartan Stores acknowledged that the supplemental disclosures in the joint proxy statement/prospectus were made in response to the Putative Class Actions. The Memorandum of Understanding contemplated that the parties will use their best efforts to agree upon, execute and present to the State Court for approval a stipulation of settlement within thirty days after the later of the date that the Merger is consummated or the date that plaintiffs and their counsel have confirmed the fairness, adequacy, and reasonableness of the settlement, and that upon execution of such stipulation, and as a condition to final approval of the settlement, the plaintiff in the Federal Action would withdraw the claims in and cause to be dismissed the Federal Action, with any individual claims being dismissed with prejudice. The Memorandum of Understanding provided that Nash-Finch would pay, on behalf of all defendants, the plaintiffs’ attorneys’ fees and expenses, subject to approval by the State Court, in an amount not to exceed $550,000. On February 11, 2014, the parties executed the Stipulation and Agreement Compromise, Settlement and Release (the “Stipulation of Settlement.”) to resolve, discharge and settle the Putative Class Actions. The Stipulation of Settlement was subject to customary conditions, including approval by the State Court, which will consider the fairness, reasonableness and adequacy of such settlement. On February 18, 2014, the Federal Court entered a final order dismissing the Federal Court Action with prejudice. On February 28, 2014, pursuant to the terms of the Stipulation of Settlement, the plaintiffs in the State Court Action filed an unopposed motion for preliminary approval of class action settlement, conditional certification of class, and approval of notice to be furnished to the class. On March 7, 2014, the State Court entered an order preliminarily approving the Settlement Stipulation, subject to a hearing, scheduled for May 20, 2014. At the hearing on May 20, 2014, the Settlement Stipulation was approved. On July 21, 2014, the appeals period expired and the matter is now closed.

SpartanNash contributes to the Central States multi-employer pension plan based on obligations arising from its collective bargaining agreements in Bellefontaine, Ohio, Lima, Ohio, and Grand Rapids, Michigan covering its distribution center union associates. This plan provides retirement benefits to participants based on their service to contributing employers. The benefits are paid from assets held in trust for that purpose. Trustees are appointed by contributing employers and unions; however, SpartanNash is not a trustee. The trustees typically are responsible for determining the level of benefits to be provided to participants, as well as for such matters as the investment of the assets and the administration of the plan. SpartanNash currently contributes to the Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund under the terms outlined in the “Primary Schedule” of Central States’ Rehabilitation Plan. This schedule requires varying increases in employer contributions over the previous year’s contribution. Increases are set within the collective bargaining agreement and vary by location.

Based on the most recent information available to SpartanNash, management believes that the present value of actuarial accrued liabilities in this multi-employer plan significantly exceeds the value of the assets held in trust to pay benefits. Because SpartanNash is one of a number of employers contributing to this plan, it is difficult to ascertain what the exact amount of the underfunding would be, although management anticipates that SpartanNash’s contributions to this plan will increase each year. Management is not aware of any significant change in funding levels since ~~December 28, 2013.~~January 3, 2015. To reduce this underfunding, management expects meaningful increases in expense as a result of required incremental multi-employer pension plan contributions in future years. Any adjustment for withdrawal liability will be recorded when it is probable that a liability exists and can be reasonably determined.

The following table provides the components of net periodic pension and postretirement benefit costs for the ~~12 weeks and 40~~16 weeks ended ~~October 4, 2014~~April 25, 2015 and ~~October 12, 2013:~~April 19, 2014:

(In thousands) 12 Weeks Ended	Cash Balance Pension Plan						Super Foods Pension Plan
(In thousands)										April 25,			April 19,
16 Weeks Ended										2015			2014
										SpartanNash			Combined SpartanNash			*	Cash Balance			Super Foods
	October 4, 2014			October 12, 2013			October 4, 2014			Pension Plan			Pension Plan				Pension Plan			Pension Plan
Interest cost	$	556		$	517		$	461		$	1,023		$	1,355			$	741		$	614
Expected return on plan assets		(867	)		(944	)		(532	)		(1,515	)		(1,865	)			(1,156	)		(709	)
Recognized actuarial net loss		228			300			—			255			305				305			—
Net periodic income	$	(83	)	$	(127	)	$	(71	)
Net periodic benefit										$	(237	)	$	(205	)		$	(110	)	$	(95	)
Settlement expense		261			—			—			—			—				—			—
Total expense (income)	$	178		$	(127	)	$	(71	)	$	(237	)	$	(205	)		$	(110	)	$	(95	)

(In thousands)										SERP							Spartan Stores Medical Plan
16 Weeks Ended										April 25,			April 19,				April 25,			April 19,
										2015			2014				2015			2014
Service cost										$	—		$	—			$	71		$	57
Interest cost											10			11				125			121
Amortization of prior service cost											—			—				(49	)		(48	)
Recognized actuarial net loss											13			9				53			6
Net periodic benefit										$	23		$	20			$	200		$	136

*The amounts above reflect the combined values of the Cash Balance and Super Foods Pension Plans as of April 19, 2014.										*The amounts above reflect the combined values of the Cash Balance and Super Foods Pension Plans as of April 19, 2014.

On January 1, 2015, the Super Foods Plan was merged into the Cash Balance Pension Plan which was renamed the SpartanNash Company Pension Plan. The Company made contributions of ~~$2.0 million and $1.1~~$0.4 million to the ~~Super Foods~~SpartanNash Company Pension Plan during the ~~40 weeks and 12~~16 weeks ended ~~October 4,~~April 25, 2015. This quarterly amount was determined based on 2014 ~~respectively, and expects~~plan year funding valuation results of the legacy Super Foods Plan. The 2015 valuation results for the merged SpartanNash Company Pension Plan may reduce or even eliminate the need for required quarterly contributions for 2015; therefore the Company does not expect to make any additional contributions ~~totaling $2.3 million~~ for the fiscal year ending January ~~3, 2015. No contributions were made to the Cash Balance Pension Plan for the 40 weeks ended October 4, 2014, nor are any expected to be made for the fiscal year ending January 3, 2015.~~2, 2016.

As previously stated in Note 7,6, SpartanNash contributes to the Central States Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund (“Fund”) (EIN 7456500) under the terms of the existing collective bargaining agreements and in the amounts set forth in the related collective bargaining agreements. SpartanNash employer contributions during the ~~39-week transition~~ fiscal year ended ~~December 28, 2013~~January 3, 2015 totaled ~~$6.8~~$12.9 million, which Fund administrators represent is less than 5% of total employer contributions to the Fund. SpartanNash’s employer contributions for the 4016 weeks ended ~~October 4,~~April 25, 2015 and April 19, 2014 ~~and October 12, 2013~~ were ~~$10.3~~$4.2 million and ~~$7.2~~$4.1 million, respectively. Based on the most recent information available to SpartanNash, management believes that the present value of actuarial accrued liabilities in this multi-employer plan significantly exceeds the value of the assets held in trust to pay benefits. Because SpartanNash is one of a number of employers contributing to this plan, it is difficult to ascertain what the exact amount of the underfunding would be, although management anticipates that SpartanNash’s contributions to this plan will increase each year. On December 13, 2014, Congress passed the Multiemployer Pension Reform Act of 2014 (“MPRA”). The MPRA is intended to address funding shortfalls in both multiemployer pension plans and the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation. Because the MPRA is a complex piece of legislation, its effects on the Plan and potential implications for the Company are not known at this time. Any adjustment for withdrawal liability will be recorded when it is probable that a liability exists and can be reasonably determined.

SpartanNash reports comprehensive income or loss in accordance with ASU 2012-13, “Comprehensive Income,” in the financial statements. Total comprehensive income is defined as all changes in shareholders’ equity during a period, other than those resulting from investments by and distributions to shareholders. Generally, for SpartanNash, total comprehensive income equals net earnings plus or minus adjustments for pension and other postretirement benefits.

While total comprehensive income is the activity in a period and is largely driven by net earnings in that period, accumulated other comprehensive income or loss (“AOCI”) represents the cumulative balance of other comprehensive income, net of tax, as of the balance sheet date. For SpartanNash, AOCI is the cumulative balance related to pension and other postretirement benefits.

During the 1216 week periods ended ~~October 4,~~April 25, 2015 and April 19, 2014, ~~and October 12, 2013, $0.1~~$0.2 million and $0.2 million, respectively, was reclassified from AOCI to the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Earnings, of which ~~$0.2~~$0.3 million and $0.3 million, respectively, increased selling, general and administrative expenses and $0.1 million ~~reduced income taxes in each period. During the 40 week periods ended October 4, 2014~~ and ~~October 12, 2013, $0.4 million and $0.5~~$0.1 million, respectively, was reclassified from AOCI to the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Earnings, of which $0.7 million and $0.8 million, respectively, increased selling, general and administrative expenses and $0.3 million reduced income taxes in each period.

The effective income tax rate was 39.0% and ~~34.5%~~37.7% for the 1216 weeks ended ~~October 4,~~April 25, 2015 and April 19, 2014, ~~and October 12, 2013, respectively. For the 40 weeks ended October 4, 2014 and October 12, 2013, the effective income tax rate was 37.6% and 37.3%,~~ respectively. The differences from the Federal statutory rate in the current and prior year periods are primarily due ~~primarily~~ to state income ~~taxes, partially offset by the benefit resulting from the favorable settlement of unrecognized tax liabilities established in the prior year.~~taxes.

SpartanNash has ~~three~~two shareholder-approved stock incentive plans that provide for the granting of incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, stock awards, and other stock-based awards to directors, officers and other key associates.

SpartanNash accounts for share-based compensation awards in accordance with the provisions of ASC Topic 718 which requires that share-based payment transactions be accounted for using a fair value method and the related compensation cost recognized in the financial statements over the period that an employee is required to provide services in exchange for the award. SpartanNash recognized share-based compensation expense (net of tax) of ~~$0.6~~$2.9 million ($~~0.02~~0.08 per diluted share) and ~~$0.5~~$2.4 million ($~~0.02~~0.06 per diluted share) for the 1216 weeks ended ~~October 4,~~April 25, 2015 and April 19, 2014, ~~and October 12, 2013,~~ respectively, as a component of Operating expenses and Income taxes in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Earnings. Share-based compensation expense (net of tax) was $3.7 million ($0.10 per diluted share) and $1.8 million ($0.8 per diluted share) for the 40 weeks ended October 4, 2014 and October 12, 2013, respectively.

The following table summarizes activity in the share-based compensation plans for the 4016 weeks ended ~~October 4, 2014:~~April 25, 2015:

Shares
Under
Options

Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price

Restricted
Stock
Awards

Weighted
Average
Grant-Date
Fair Value

Outstanding at December 28, 2013

586,766

$
19.30

518,835

$
23.56

Granted

—

—

317,576

22.63

Exercised/Vested

(64,120
)

12.17

(219,894
)

16.41

Cancelled/Forfeited

(4,131
)

3.25

(11,840
)

21.82

Outstanding at October 4, 2014

518,515

$
20.31

604,677

$
23.09

Vested and expected to vest in the future at October 4, 2014

518,515

$
20.31

Exercisable at October 4, 2014

518,515

$
20.31

	Shares			Weighted		Restricted			Weighted Average
	Under			Average		Stock			Grant-Date
	Options			Exercise Price		Awards			Fair Value
Outstanding at January 3, 2015		494,483		$	20.61		600,653			23.08
Granted		—			—		311,622			26.55
Exercised/Vested		(91,875	)		21.99		(112,360	)		22.68
Cancelled/Forfeited		—			—		(6,943	)		21.40
Outstanding at April 25, 2015		402,608		$	20.30		792,972			24.50
Vested and expected to vest in the future at April 25, 2015		402,608		$	20.30
Exercisable at April 25, 2015		402,608		$	20.30

There were no stock options granted during the 4016 weeks ended ~~October 4, 2014~~April 25, 2015 and ~~October 12, 2013.~~April 19, 2014.

As of ~~October 4, 2014,~~April 25, 2015, total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested share-based awards granted under our stock incentive plans was ~~$5.6~~$8.0 million for restricted stock. The remaining compensation costs not yet recognized are expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of ~~2.4~~2.8 years for restricted stock. All compensation costs related to stock options have been recognized.

Results of the discontinued operations are excluded from the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements for all periods presented, unless otherwise noted. There were no additional operations that were reclassified to discontinued operations during the 4016 weeks ended ~~October 4, 2014.~~April 25, 2015.

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share for continuing operations:

													16 Weeks Ended
	12 Weeks Ended						40 Weeks Ended						April 25,			April 19,
(In thousands, except per share amounts)	October 4, 2014			October 12, 2013			October 4, 2014			October 12, 2013			2015			2014
Numerator:
Earnings from continuing operations	$	17,169		$	6,659		$	47,083		$	23,627		$	10,447		$	12,519
Adjustment for earnings attributable to participating securities		(280	)		(155	)		(820	)		(564	)		(189	)		(232	)
Earnings from continuing operations used in calculating earnings per share	$	16,889		$	6,504		$	46,263		$	23,063		$	10,258		$	12,287
Denominator:
Weighted average shares outstanding, including participating securities		37,717			21,876			37,678			21,820			37,689			37,600
Adjustment for participating securities		(616	)		(508	)		(656	)		(521	)		(682	)		(697	)
Shares used in calculating basic earnings per share		37,101			21,368			37,022			21,299			37,007			36,903
Effect of dilutive stock options		61			93			71			88			113			118
Shares used in calculating diluted earnings per share		37,162			21,461			37,093			21,387			37,120			37,021
Basic earnings per share from continuing operations	$	0.46		$	0.30		$	1.25		$	1.08		$	0.28		$	0.33
Diluted earnings per share from continuing operations	$	0.45		$	0.30		$	1.25		$	1.08		$	0.28		$	0.33

Non-cash financing activities include the issuance of restricted stock to employees and directors of ~~$7.2~~$8.3 million and ~~$3.8~~$6.9 million for the 4016 weeks ended ~~October 4,~~April 25, 2015 and April 19, 2014, ~~and October 12, 2013,~~ respectively. Non-cash investing activities include capital expenditures included in accounts payable of ~~$3.6~~$2.0 million and ~~$1.9~~$1.8 million for the 4016 weeks ended ~~October 4,~~April 25, 2015 and April 19, 2014, ~~and October 12, 2013,~~ respectively.

The allocation of intersegment profit and corporate level expenses to the reporting segments was historically performed for the legacy Spartan Stores operations and the legacy Nash-Finch Company operations using methodologies consistent with Spartan Stores’ and Nash-Finch Company’s respective historical practices. As previously disclosed, subsequent to the merger management commenced an evaluation of potential methodologies for allocating intersegment profit and corporate level expenses to the reporting segments to determine the most appropriate manner for the newly merged operations. During the third quarter of fiscal 2014, management completed this evaluation. The new allocation methodology was applied in the third quarter of fiscal year 2014 and reflects the manner in which the business is now managed and how management allocates resources and assesses performance. In accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, results for the first and second quarters of fiscal 2014 and all quarters in fiscal year 2013 have been revised to reflect the new allocation methodologies. There was no impact to consolidated financial results.

The following tables set forth information about SpartanNash by operating ~~segment under the new methodologies:~~segment:

(In thousands)

Food
Distribution

Retail

Total

12 Week Period Ended October 12, 2013

Net sales to external customers

$
270,195

$
359,893

$
630,088

Inter-segment sales

150,561

—

150,561

Merger transaction and integration expenses

4,634

—

4,634

Depreciation and amortization

1,529

8,179

9,708

Operating earnings

1,366

11,006

12,372

Capital expenditures

3,059

6,199

9,258

(In thousands)

Military

Food
Distribution

Retail

Total

40 Week Period Ended October 4, 2014

Net sales to external customers

$
1,710,122

$
2,503,216

$
1,740,135

$
5,953,473

Inter-segment sales

—

751,777

—

751,777

Merger transaction and integration expenses

27

8,097

4

8,128

Depreciation and amortization

8,580

23,105

35,236

66,921

Operating earnings

15,956

38,713

39,170

93,839

Capital expenditures

13,968

19,319

24,324

57,611

(In thousands)

Food
Distribution

Retail

Total

40 Week Period Ended October 12, 2013

Net sales to external customers

$
878,791

$
1,182,700

$
2,061,491

Inter-segment sales

493,936

—

493,936

Merger transaction and integration expenses

7,011

—

7,011

Depreciation and amortization

5,225

26,701

31,926

Operating earnings

15,519

33,111

48,630

Capital expenditures

8,528

20,256

28,784


(In thousands)	Military		Food Distribution		Retail			Total
16 Week Period Ended April 25, 2015
Net sales to external customers	$	699,394	$	986,435	$	626,854		$	2,312,683
Inter-segment sales		—		281,275		—			281,275
Merger integration and acquisition expenses		—		2,187		497			2,684
Depreciation and amortization		3,733		8,536		13,516			25,785
Operating earnings		6,158		20,249		(2,554	)		23,853
Capital expenditures		584		3,553		8,587			12,724

(In thousands)	Military		Food Distribution		Retail			Total
16 Week Period Ended April 19, 2014
Net sales to external customers	$	684,167	$	971,002	$	678,558		$	2,333,727
Inter-segment sales		—		296,346		—			296,346
Merger integration and acquisition expenses		—		4,168		—			4,168
Depreciation and amortization		4,277		9,019		14,257			27,553
Operating earnings		4,421		14,209		8,948			27,578
Capital expenditures		10,195		6,567		6,077			22,839

Military

Food
Distribution

Retail

Total

Allocation methodology changes applied

Net sales to external customers

$
—

$
—

$
—

$
—

Inter-segment sales

—

(12,244
)

—

(12,244
)
Merger transaction and integration expenses

—

—

—

—

Depreciation and amortization

66

(550
)

484

—

Operating earnings

(847
)

(458
)

1,305

—

Capital expenditures

—

—

—

—

	April 25, 2015		January 3, 2015
Total Assets
Military	$	462,978	$	435,647
Food Distribution		742,732		763,914
Retail		705,343		727,979
Discontinued operations		4,742		4,742
Total	$	1,915,795	$	1,932,282

	12 Weeks Ended								40 Weeks Ended								16 Weeks Ended
(Dollars in thousands)	October 4, 2014				October 12, 2013				October 4, 2014				October 12, 2013				April 25, 2015				April 19, 2014
Non-perishables ⁽¹⁾	$	1,146,410	63.4	%	$	312,038	49.5	%	$	3,753,373	63.1	%	$	1,012,545	49.1	%	$	1,472,711	63.7	%	$	1,475,060	63.2	%
Perishables ⁽²⁾		554,970	30.7			223,841	35.5			1,840,802	30.9			740,582	35.9			713,034	30.8	%		719,004	30.8	%
Pharmacy		65,733	3.6			50,909	8.1			215,459	3.6			163,242	7.9			92,039	4.0	%		84,693	3.6	%
Fuel		42,458	2.3			43,300	6.9			143,839	2.4			145,122	7.1			34,899	1.5	%		54,970	2.4	%
Consolidated net sales	$	1,809,571	100	%	$	630,088	100	%	$	5,953,473	100	%	$	2,061,491	100	%	$	2,312,683	100.0	%	$	2,333,727	100.0	%

On April 27, 2015, the Company entered into an asset purchase agreement with Dan’s Supermarket Inc., a six-store chain serving Bismarck and Mandan, North Dakota. The transaction is expected to close in June, 2015.

ITEM 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

SpartanNash Company is headquartered in Grand Rapids, Michigan. Our business consists of three primary operating segments: Military, Food Distribution and Retail. We are a leading ~~regional~~multi-regional grocery distributor and grocery retailer ~~operating principally in the Midwest,~~ and the largest distributor, by revenue, of grocery products to military commissaries and exchanges in the United States.

Our Military segment contracts with manufacturers to distribute a wide variety of grocery products primarily to military commissaries and exchanges located in the United States, the District of Columbia, Europe, Puerto Rico, Cuba, ~~the Azores,~~ Egypt, Bahrain and ~~Bahrain.~~Honduras. We have over 3040 years of experience acting as a distributor to U.S. military commissaries and exchanges.

Our Food Distribution segment provides a wide variety of nationally branded and private label grocery products and perishable food products, including dry groceries, produce, dairy products, meat, deli, bakery, frozen food, seafood, floral products, general merchandise, pharmacy and health and beauty care from 1312 distribution centers to approximately 2,100 independent retail locations and ~~165~~159 corporate-owned retail stores located in 3144 states, primarily in the Midwest, Great Lakes, and Southeast regions of the United States. We also service a large national retailer with certain product classes. Food Distribution sales are made to more than 11,500 retail locations for this customer.

Our Retail segment operates ~~165~~159 supermarkets in the Midwest and Great Lakes which operate primarily under the banners of Family Fare Supermarkets, No Frills, Bag ‘N Save, Family Fresh Markets, D&W Fresh Markets, Sun Mart and Econofoods. Our retail supermarkets typically offer dry groceries, produce, dairy products, meat, frozen food, seafood, floral products, general merchandise, beverages, tobacco products, health and beauty care products, delicatessen items and bakery goods. We offer pharmacy services in 79 of our supermarkets and we operate 30 fuel centers. Our retail supermarkets have a “neighborhood market” focus to distinguish them from supercenters and limited assortment stores.

Typically, all fiscal quarters are 12 weeks, except for our first quarter, which is 16 weeks and will generally include the Easter holiday. Our fourth quarter includes the Thanksgiving and Christmas holidays. Fiscal 2014 ~~will be~~was comprised of 53 weeks. As a result, the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014 ~~will consist~~consisted of 13 weeks.

The following table sets forth items from our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Earnings as a percentage of net sales and the year-to-year percentage change in the dollar amounts:

	Percentage of Net Sales												Percentage Change						Percentage of Net Sales
	12 Weeks Ended						40 Weeks Ended						12 Weeks Ended			40 Weeks Ended			April 25,				April 19,
(Unaudited)	October 4, 2014			October 12, 2013			October 4, 2014			October 12, 2013			October 4, 2014			October 4, 2014			2015				2014				Percentage Change
Net sales		100.0			100.0			100.0			100.0			187.2			188.8			100.0				100.0				(0.9	)
Gross profit		14.4			20.7			14.7			21.1			100.4			100.6			14.5				14.9				(3.2	)
Merger integration and acquisition																				0.1				0.2				(35.6	)
Selling, general and administrative expenses		12.5	*		18.0			13.0			18.3			100.7			104.4			13.1				13.5				(4.2	)
Merger transaction and integration expenses		0.1			0.7			0.1			0.3			(70.2	)		15.9
Restructuring and asset impairment charges (gains)		(0.1	)		-			-			0.1			**			(103.0	)
Restructuring and asset impairment																				0.3				0.0			**
Operating earnings		1.9			2.0			1.6			2.4			171.7			93.0			1.0				1.2				(13.5	)
Other income and expenses		0.3			0.4	*		0.3			0.6	*		148.5			68.2			0.3				0.3				(10.1	)
Earnings before income taxes and discontinued operations		1.6			1.6			1.3			1.8			176.7			100.2			0.7				0.9				(14.8	)
Income taxes		0.7	*		0.6			0.5			0.7			212.5			101.7			0.2		*		0.4		*		(11.8	)
Earnings from continuing operations		0.9			1.0	*		0.8			1.1			157.8			99.3			0.5				0.5				(16.6	)
Loss from discontinued operations, net of taxes		(0.0	)		(0.0	)		(0.0	)		(0.0	)		(17.0	)		(16.4	)		(0.1	)	*		(0.0	)			(42.6	)
Net earnings		0.9			1.0			0.8			1.1			160.2			101.4			0.4				0.5				(16.1	)

Adjusted operating earnings is a non-GAAP operating financial measure that the Company defines as operating earnings plus or minus adjustments for items that do not reflect the ongoing operating activities of the Company and costs associated with the closing of operational locations.

The Company believes that adjusted operating earnings provide a meaningful representation of its operating performance for the Company. The Company considers adjusted operating earnings as an additional way to measure operating performance on an ongoing basis. Adjusted operating earnings is meant to reflect the ongoing operating performance of all of its ~~military, food~~ distribution and retail operations; consequently, it excludes the impact of items that could be considered “non-operating” or “non-core” in nature, and also excludes the contributions of activities classified as discontinued operations. Because adjusted operating earnings is a performance measure that management uses to allocate resources, assess performance against its peers and evaluate overall performance, the Company believes it provides useful information for investors. In addition, securities analysts, fund managers and other shareholders and stakeholders that communicate with the Company request its operating financial results in adjusted operating earnings format.

Adjusted operating earnings is not a measure of performance under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and should not be considered as a substitute for operating earnings, cash flows from operating activities and other income or cash flow statement data. The Company’s definition of adjusted operating earnings may not be identical to similarly titled measures reported by other companies.

Following is an unaudited reconciliation of ~~Operating~~operating earnings to adjusted operating earnings for the ~~twelve and forty~~sixteen weeks ended ~~October 4, 2014~~April 25, 2015 and ~~October 12, 2013.~~April 19, 2014.

	12 Weeks Ended					40 Weeks Ended
	October 4, 2014			October 12, 2013		October 4, 2014			October 12, 2013
(Unaudited)											16 Weeks Ended
(In thousands)											April 25, 2015			April 19, 2014
Operating earnings	$	33,612		$	12,372	$	93,839		$	48,630	$	23,853		$	27,578
Add:
Asset impairment and restructuring (gains) charges		(1,272	)		-		(67	)		2,220
Expenses related to merger transaction and integration		1,379			4,634		8,128			7,011
Adjustments:
Merger integration and acquisition												2,684			4,168
Restructuring and asset impairment												7,338			127
Adjusted operating earnings	$	33,719		$	17,006	$	101,900		$	57,861	$	33,875		$	31,873
Reconciliation of operating earnings to adjusted operating earnings by segment:	Reconciliation of operating earnings to adjusted operating earnings by segment:										Reconciliation of operating earnings to adjusted operating earnings by segment:
Military:
Operating earnings	$	5,651		$	-	$	15,956		$	-	$	6,158		$	4,421
Add:
Expenses related to merger transaction and integration		3			-		27			-
Adjusted operating earnings	$	5,654		$	-	$	15,983		$	-	$	6,158		$	4,421
Food Distribution:
Operating earnings	$	13,834		$	1,366	$	38,713		$	15,519	$	20,249		$	14,209
Add:
Asset impairment and restructuring charges		-			-		1,029			-
Expenses related to merger transaction and integration		1,375			4,634		8,097			7,011
Adjustments:
Merger integration and acquisition												2,187			4,168
Restructuring (gains) charges and asset impairment												(281	)		722
Adjusted operating earnings	$	15,209		$	6,000	$	47,839		$	22,530	$	22,155		$	19,099
Retail:
Operating earnings	$	14,127		$	11,006	$	39,170		$	33,111
Add:
Asset impairment and restructuring (gains) charges		(1,272	)		-		(1,096	)		2,220
Expenses related to merger transaction and integration		1			-		4			-
Operating (loss) earnings											$	(2,554	)	$	8,948
Adjustments:
Merger integration and acquisition												497			—
Restructuring charges (gains) and asset impairment												7,619			(595	)
Adjusted operating earnings	$	12,856		$	11,006	$	38,078		$	35,331	$	5,562		$	8,353

Adjusted earnings from continuing operations is a non-GAAP operating financial measure that we define as earnings from continuing operations plus or minus adjustments for items that do not reflect the ongoing operating activities of the Company and costs associated with the closing of operational locations.

We believe that adjusted earnings from continuing operations provide a meaningful representation of our operating performance for the Company. We consider adjusted earnings from continuing operations as an additional way to measure operating performance on an ongoing basis. Adjusted earnings from continuing operations is meant to reflect the ongoing operating performance of all of our ~~military, food~~ distribution and retail operations; consequently, it excludes the impact of items that could be considered “non-operating” or “non-core” in nature, and also excludes the contributions of activities classified as discontinued operations. We believe that adjusted earnings from continuing operations provides useful information for our investors because it is a performance measure that management uses to allocate resources, assess performance against its peers and evaluate overall performance. In addition, securities analysts, fund managers and other shareholders and stakeholders that communicate with us request our operating financial results in adjusted earnings from continuing operations format.

Adjusted earnings from continuing operations is not a measure of performance under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and should not be considered as a substitute for net earnings, cash flows from operating activities and other income or cash flow statement data. Our definition of adjusted earnings from continuing operations may not be identical to similarly titled measures reported by other companies.

Following is aan unaudited reconciliation of ~~Earnings~~earnings from continuing operations to adjusted earnings from continuing operations for the ~~twelve and forty~~sixteen weeks ended ~~October 4, 2014~~April 25, 2015 and ~~October 12, 2013.~~April 19, 2014.

12 Weeks Ended

October 4, 2014

October 12, 2013

Earnings from

Earnings from

Earnings

continuing

Earnings

continuing

from

operations

from

operations

(Unaudited)
continuing

per diluted

continuing

per diluted

(In thousands, except per share data)
operations

share

operations

share

Earnings from continuing operations
$
17,169

$
0.45

$
6,659

$
0.30

Adjustments, net of taxes:

Restructuring and asset impairment gains

(782
)

(0.02
)

-

-

Expenses related to merger transaction and integration

807

0.03

*

2,906

0.14

*
Favorable settlement of unrecognized tax liability

-

-

(238
)

(0.01
)

Adjusted earnings from continuing operations
$
17,194

$
0.46

$
9,327

$
0.43

Weighted average diluted shares outstanding

37,778

21,969

40 Weeks Ended

October 4, 2014

October 12, 2013

Earnings from

Earnings from

Earnings

continuing

Earnings

continuing

from

operations

from

operations

(Unaudited)
continuing

per diluted

continuing

per diluted

(In thousands, except per share data)
operations

share

operations

share

Earnings from continuing operations
$
47,083

$
1.25

$
23,627

$
1.08

Adjustments, net of taxes:

Restructuring and asset impairment (gains) charges

(41
)

(0.00
)

1,378

0.06

Debt extinguishment

-

-

1,715

0.08

Expenses related to merger transaction and integration

4,999

0.13

4,352

0.20

Favorable settlement of unrecognized tax liability

(595
)

(0.02
)

(238
)

(0.01
)

Adjusted earnings from continuing operations
$
51,446

$
1.36

$
30,834

$
1.41

Weighted average diluted shares outstanding

37,749

21,908

~~Consolidated adjusted~~Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP operating financial measure that we define as ~~net~~operating earnings ~~from continuing operations~~ plus depreciation and amortization, and other non-cash items including ~~imputed interest, non-cash stock~~deferred (stock) compensation, the LIFO provision, as well as adjustments for unusual items that do not reflect the ongoing operating activities of ~~SpartanNash~~the Company and costs associated with the closing of operational ~~locations, interest expense and the provision for income taxes to the extent deducted in the computation of net earnings.~~locations.

We believe that adjusted EBITDA provides a meaningful representation of our operating performance for ~~SpartanNash~~the Company as a whole and for our operating segments. We consider adjusted EBITDA as an additional way to measure operating performance on an ongoing basis. Adjusted EBITDA is meant to reflect the ongoing operating performance of all of our ~~military, food~~ distribution and retail operations; consequently, it excludes the impact of items that could be considered “non-operating” or “non-core” in nature, and also excludes the contributions of activities classified as discontinued operations. Because adjusted EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA by segment are performance measures that management uses to allocate resources, assess performance against its peers, and evaluate overall performance, we believe it provides useful information for our investors. In addition, securities analysts, fund managers and other shareholders and stakeholders that communicate with us request our operating financial results in adjusted EBITDA format.

Adjusted EBITDA is not a measure of performance under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and should not be considered as a substitute for net earnings, cash flows from operating activities and other income or cash flow statement data. Our definition of adjusted EBITDA may not be identical to similarly titled measures reported by other companies.

Following is aan unaudited reconciliation of ~~net~~operating earnings to ~~Adjusted~~adjusted EBITDA for the ~~twelve and forty~~sixteen weeks ended ~~October 4, 2014~~April 25, 2015 and ~~October 12, 2013.~~April 19, 2014.

12 Weeks Ended

40 Weeks Ended

(In thousands)
October 4, 2014

October 12, 2013

October 4, 2014

October 12, 2013

Net earnings
$
17,096

$
6,571

$
46,725

$
23,199

Add:

Discontinued operations

73

88

358

428

Income taxes

10,977

3,513

28,336

14,050

Interest expense

5,467

2,205

18,416

8,211

Debt extinguishment

-

-

-

2,762

Non-operating expense (income)

(1
)

(5
)

4

(20
)
Operating earnings

33,612

12,372

93,839

48,630

Add:

LIFO expense

1,550

167

5,077

413

Depreciation and amortization

19,951

9,708

66,921

31,926

Restructuring and asset impairment (gains) charges

(1,272
)

-

(67
)

2,220

Expenses related to merger transaction and integration

1,379

4,634

8,128

7,011

Non-cash stock compensation and other

691

577

5,205

2,285

Adjusted EBITDA
$
55,911

$
27,458

$
179,103

$
92,485

Military:
Operating earnings	$	5,651		$	-		$	15,956		$	-		$	6,158		$	4,421
Add:
Adjustments:
LIFO expense		359			-			1,192			-			388			471
Depreciation and amortization		2,751			-			8,580			-			3,733			4,277
Expenses related to merger transaction and integration		3			-			27			-
Non-cash stock compensation and other		4			-			(55	)		-
Stock based compensation														704			310
Other non-cash charges														97			5
Adjusted EBITDA	$	8,768		$	-		$	25,700		$	-		$	11,080		$	9,484
Food Distribution:
Operating earnings	$	13,834		$	1,366		$	38,713		$	15,519		$	20,249		$	14,209
Add:
LIFO expense (income)		794			(5	)		2,551			(199	)
Adjustments:
LIFO expense														890			962
Depreciation and amortization		6,931			1,573			23,105			5,269			8,536			9,019
Restructuring and asset impairment charges		-			-			1,029			-
Expenses related to merger transaction and integration		1,375			4,634			8,097			7,011
Non-cash stock compensation and other		467			334			3,476			1,284
Restructuring (gains) charges and asset impairment														(281	)		722
Merger integration and acquisition														2,187			4,168
Stock based compensation														2,230			1,911
Other non-cash charges (gains)														35			(78	)
Adjusted EBITDA	$	23,401		$	7,902		$	76,971		$	28,884		$	33,846		$	30,913
Retail:
Operating earnings	$	14,127		$	11,006		$	39,170		$	33,111
Add:
Operating (loss) earnings													$	(2,554	)	$	8,948
Adjustments:
LIFO expense		397			172			1,334			612			445			539
Depreciation and amortization		10,269			8,135			35,236			26,657			13,516			14,257
Restructuring and asset impairment (gains) charges		(1,272	)		-			(1,096	)		2,220
Expenses related to merger transaction and integration		1			-			4			-
Non-cash stock compensation and other		220			243			1,784			1,001
Restructuring charges (gains) and asset impairment														7,619			(595	)
Merger integration and acquisition														497			—
Stock based compensation														1,819			1,708
Other non-cash (gains)														(379	)		(342	)
Adjusted EBITDA	$	23,742		$	19,556		$	76,432		$	63,601		$	20,963		$	24,515

Net Sales – Net sales for the quarter ended ~~October 4, 2014~~April 25, 2015 (“~~third~~first quarter”) ~~increased $1,179.5~~decreased $21.0 million, or ~~187.2~~0.9 percent, from ~~$630.1~~$2,333.7 million in the quarter ended ~~October 12, 2013~~April 19, 2014 (“prior year ~~third~~first quarter”) to ~~$1,809.6 million.~~ $2,312.7 million as increases in the food distribution and military segments were offset by the impact of our store rationalization plan and significantly lower retail fuel prices.

Net sales for the ~~year-to-date period ended October 4, 2014 (“year-to-date”)~~first quarter in our Military segment increased ~~$3,892.0~~$15.2 million, or ~~188.8~~2.2 percent, from ~~$2,061.5~~$684.2 million in the prior ~~year-to-date period ended October 12, 2013 (“prior year-to-date”)~~year first quarter to ~~$5,953.5~~$699.4 million. The ~~third~~first quarter increase ~~in net sales~~ was primarily due to ~~$1.2 billion in~~increased export sales generated as a result of the merger with Nash-Finch and positive Retail comparable store sales, excluding fuel, of 0.4 percent, partially offset by decreased sales due to closed stores in the Retail segment. The increase in year-to-date net sales was primarily due to $3.9 billion in sales generated as a result of the merger with Nash-Finch, as well as an increase in Retail comparable store sales, excluding fuel, of 1.0 percent and net new ~~business gains in the Food Distribution segment. The increase in year-to-date net sales was partially offset by decreased sales due to closed stores in the Retail segment.~~business.

Net sales for the ~~third quarter and the year-to-date period in our Military segment were $523.6 million and $1,710.1 million, respectively.~~

~~Net sales for the third~~first quarter in our Food Distribution segment, after intercompany eliminations, increased ~~$494.1~~$15.4 million, or ~~182.9~~1.6 percent, from ~~$270.2~~$971.0 million in the prior year ~~third~~first quarter to $764.3 million. Net sales for the current year-to-date period in our Food Distribution segment, after intercompany eliminations, increased $1,624.4 million, or 184.8 percent, from $878.8 million in the prior year-to-date period to $2,503.2 million. The third quarter increase was primarily due to additional sales of $493.5 million resulting from the merger. The year-to-date increase was primarily due to additional sales of $1,614.6 million resulting from the merger, net new business of $6.6 million and a net increase in pharmacy sales of $6.3$986.4 million.

Net sales for the ~~third~~first quarter in our Retail segment ~~increased $161.8~~decreased $51.7 million, or ~~45.0~~7.6 percent, from ~~$359.9~~$678.6 million in the prior year ~~third~~first quarter to ~~$521.7 million. Net sales for the year-to-date period increased $557.4~~$626.9 million, ~~or 47.1 percent, from $1,182.7 million in the prior year-to-date period to $1,740.1 million. The third quarter increase was~~ primarily due to $27.8 million in lower sales due to the closure of ~~$179.2~~retail stores and fuel centers, $15.8 million ~~resulting from the merger~~in significantly lower retail fuel prices and ~~positive~~a 1.2 percent decrease in comparable store sales, excluding fuel, of 0.4 percent, partially offset by a decrease in sales of $19.5 million due to store closures. The year-to-date increase was primarily due to sales of $605.5 million resulting from the merger and afuel. As anticipated, comparable store sales ~~increase~~reflect the inclusion of ~~1.0 percent, partially offset by a decrease~~the stores obtained in ~~sales of $56.1 million due to~~the merger with Nash Finch, the significant winter weather benefit in the first quarter last year and limited center store ~~closures.~~inflation. We define a retail store as comparable when it is in operation for 14 periods (a period is four weeks), and we include remodeled, expanded and relocated stores in comparable stores.

Gross Profit – Gross profit represents net sales less cost of sales, which include purchase costs, freight, physical inventory adjustments, markdowns and promotional allowances. Vendor allowances that relate to our buying and merchandising activities consist primarily of promotional allowances, which are generally allowances on purchased quantities and, to a lesser extent, slotting allowances, which are billed to vendors for our merchandising costs, such as setting up warehouse infrastructure. Vendor allowances associated with product cost are recognized as a reduction in cost of sales when the product is sold. Lump sum payments received for multi-year contracts are amortized over the life of the contracts based on contractual terms.

Gross profit for the ~~third~~first quarter ~~increased $130.9~~decreased $11.1 million, or ~~100.4~~3.2 percent, from ~~$130.5~~$347.3 million in the prior year ~~third~~first quarter to ~~$261.4~~$336.2 million. As a percent of net sales, gross profit for the ~~third~~first quarter decreased to ~~14.4~~14.5 percent from 20.7 percent. Gross profit for the year-to-date period increased $438.3 million, or 100.6 percent, from $435.6 million in the prior year-to-date period to $873.9 million. As a percent of net sales, gross profit for the year-to-date period decreased to 14.7 percent from 21.114.9 percent. The ~~third~~first quarter ~~and year-to-date~~ gross profit rate ~~decreases were~~decrease was principally driven by ~~sales~~a higher mix ~~due to the merger with Nash-Finch, the impact~~ of ~~higher LIFO expense~~lower margin military and lower center store inflation. Excluding the gross profit resulting from the merger with Nash-Finch, third quarter gross profit decreased $4.2 million, or 3.2 percent, and as a rate to sales decreased to 20.6 percent from 20.7 percent. Excluding the gross profit resulting from the merger with Nash-Finch, year-to-date gross profit decreased $14.6 million, or 3.4 percent, and as a rate to sales decreased to 20.8 percent from 21.1 percent.food distribution sales.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses – Selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) expenses consist primarily of salaries and wages, employee benefits, warehousing costs, store occupancy costs, shipping and handling, utilities, equipment rental, depreciation and other administrative costs.

SG&A expenses for the ~~third~~first quarter ~~increased $114.2~~decreased $13.1 million, or ~~100.7~~4.2 percent, from ~~$113.5~~$315.5 million in the prior year ~~third~~first quarter to ~~$227.7~~$302.4 million. As a percent of net sales, SG&A expenses were ~~12.5~~13.1 percent for the ~~third~~first quarter compared to ~~18.0~~13.5 percent in the prior year ~~third~~first quarter. SG&A expenses for the year-to-date period increased $394.3 million, or 104.4 percent, from $377.7 million in the prior year-to-date period to $772.0 million. As a percent of net sales, SG&A expenses were 13.0 percent for the current year-to-date period compared to 18.3 percent in the prior year-to-date period. The dollar increase in the third quarter was due primarily to $121.8 million in expenses related to the Nash-Finch operations, partially offset by decreased store labor and SG&A expenses of $5.4 million due to store closures and a reduction of health care expenses of $2.0 million. The decrease ~~as a percent of sales~~ was primarily due to benefits from merger synergies, lower fuel and health care costs as well as the ~~merger with Nash-Finch~~impact of closed stores and ~~related synergies. Excluding the expenses related to Nash-Finch operations, SG&A~~one closed warehouse.

Merger Integration and Acquisition –Merger integration and acquisition expenses for the ~~third~~first quarter ~~would have~~ decreased ~~$7.6~~$1.5 million, or ~~6.6 percent,~~35.6%, from ~~$113.5~~$4.2 million in the prior year ~~third~~first quarter to $105.9 million. As a percent of sales, SG&A expenses excluding the Nash-Finch operations would have been 17.3 percent for the third quarter compared to 18.0 percent in the prior year third quarter. The dollar increase in the year-to-date period was due primarily to $410.5$2.7 million ~~in expenses~~ related to the Nash-Finch operations, partially offset by decreased store labor and SG&A expenses of $14.7 million due to store closures and reduced health care expenses. The decrease as a percent of sales was primarily due toon-going integration activities following the merger with Nash-Finch and related synergies. Excluding the expenses related to Nash-Finch operations, SG&A expenses for the year-to-date period would have decreased $16.2 million, or 4.3 percent, from $377.7 million in the prior year-to-date period to $361.5 million. As a percent of sales, SG&A expenses excluding the Nash-Finch operations would have been 17.9 percent for the year-to-date period compared to 18.3 percent in the prior year-to-date period.

~~Merger Transaction and Integration~~ – Merger transaction and integration expenses consist of expenses related to consummating the merger with Nash-Finch Company on November 19, 2013 and costs to integrate the operations of the two companies. Merger transaction and integration expenses decreased $3.2 million, or 70.2 percent, from $4.6 million to $1.4 million. For the year-to-date period, merger transaction and integration expenses increased $1.1 million, or 15.9%, from $7.0 million to $8.1 million. Company.

Restructuring and Asset Impairment – The ~~third~~first quarter restructuring and asset impairment ~~gain~~charges consisted primarily of ~~gains~~ charges related to underperforming retail stores and costs related to the closure of retail storesand a distribution center, partially offset by the gain on ~~sales~~sale of assets related to a previously closed ~~stores, net~~food distribution center and favorable settlements on lease terminations of ~~store closing costs. The current year-to-date restructuring~~previously closed stores. Restructuring and asset impairment ~~gain~~charges in the prior year first quarter consisted primarily of ~~gains on the sales of assets related to certain closed stores and a favorable settlement on a lease termination of a previously closed store, partially offset by~~ asset impairment charges for a retail store and restructuring charges related to the closure of a distribution ~~center. Restructuring and asset impairment in the prior year-to-date period consisted~~center, partially offset by gains on sales of ~~asset impairment charges~~assets related to ~~an underperforming retail store.~~certain closed stores.

Interest Expense – Interest expense ~~increased $3.3~~decreased $0.7 million, or ~~147.9~~9.7 percent, from ~~$2.2~~$7.5 million in the prior year ~~third~~first quarter to ~~$5.5 million. For the year-to-date period, interest expense increased $10.2 million, or 124.3 percent, from $8.2 million to $18.4~~$6.8 million. The ~~increase~~decrease in interest expense was primarily due to ~~increased~~decreased borrowings and a lower interest rate from the amended ~~and restated~~senior secured credit agreement. On January 9, 2015, the Company amended its credit agreement ~~that was entered into contemporaneously with~~which reduced the ~~closing of the merger with Nash-Finch Company, partially offset by the redemption of the convertible senior notes in the prior year first quarter.~~

~~Debt Extinguishment~~ ~~– Debt extinguishment charges of $2.8 million were incurred in the prior year first quarter in connection with the redemption of $57.4 million of Convertible Senior Notes.~~interest rate.

Income Taxes – The effective income tax rate was ~~39.0 percent~~39.0% and ~~34.5 percent~~37.7% for the 1216 weeks ended ~~October 4,~~April 25, 2015 and April 19, 2014, ~~and October 12, 2013, respectively. For the 40 weeks ended October 4, 2014 and October 12, 2013, the effective income tax rate was 37.6 percent and 37.3 percent,~~ respectively. The ~~difference~~differences from the Federal statutory rate in ~~both~~ the current and prior year periods ~~was~~are primarily due ~~primarily~~ to state income ~~taxes, partially offset by a benefit for the favorable settlement of an unrecognized tax liabilities established in the prior year.~~taxes.

Certain of our retail and food distribution operations have been recorded as discontinued operations. Results of the discontinued operations are excluded from the accompanying notes to the financial statements for all periods presented, unless otherwise noted.

The following table summarizes our consolidated statements of cash flows for the 4016 weeks ended:

	40 Weeks Ended						16 Weeks Ended
	October 4, 2014			October 12, 2013			April 25, 2015			April 19, 2014
Cash flows from operating activities
Net cash provided by operating activities	$	117,385		$	56,137		$	48,941		$	32,595
Net cash used in investing activities		(54,362	)		(29,764	)		(4,523	)		(22,063	)
Net cash used in financing activities		(63,912	)		(29,379	)		(42,291	)		(4,450	)
Net cash used in discontinued operations		(279	)		(454	)		(95	)		(234	)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents		(1,168	)		(3,460	)
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents								2,032			5,848
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		9,216			8,960			6,443			9,216
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	8,048		$	5,500		$	8,475		$	15,064

Net cash provided by operating activities increased from the prior ~~year-to-date period~~year first quarter primarily due to the ~~merger with Nash-Finch and by the~~ timing of ~~seasonal~~ working capital requirements.

Net cash used in investing activities ~~increased $24.6~~decreased $17.5 million to ~~$54.4~~$4.5 million during the ~~current year-to-date period~~first quarter from $22.1 million in the prior year first quarter. The decrease was primarily due to ~~an increase~~proceeds from the sale of assets related to a previously closed food distribution center in the first quarter and capital expenditures ~~resulting from~~related to the ~~merger with Nash-Finch.~~expansion of a military distribution center in the prior year first quarter. Military, Food Distribution and Retail segments utilized ~~24.3~~4.6 percent, ~~33.5~~27.9 percent and ~~42.2~~67.5 percent of capital expenditures, ~~respectively.~~respectively in fiscal 2015.

Net cash used in financing activities in the ~~current year-to-date period~~first quarter resulted primarily from net payments from the revolving credit facility of ~~$42.9~~$32.0 million, the payment of dividends of ~~$13.6~~$5.1 million, the repayment of other long term debt of ~~$5.8~~$3.0 million and share repurchases of $2.5 million. Net cash used in financing activities in the prior ~~year-to-date period consisted of~~year first quarter resulted primarily from the ~~repurchase of the Convertible Senior Notes for $58.0 million,~~ payment of dividends of ~~$5.7 million and the repayment of other long term debt of $3.1 million, partially offset by net proceeds from the revolving credit facility of $37.1~~$4.5 million. ~~The increase in dividends paid was due to an increase in shares outstanding due to the merger with Nash-Finch and a 33.3~~A 12.5 percent increase in the quarterly dividend rate from ~~$0.09~~$0.12 per share to ~~$0.12~~$0.135 per share ~~that~~ was approved by the Board of Directors and announced on ~~March 3, 2014.~~February 25, 2015. Although we expect to continue to pay a quarterly cash dividend, adoption of a dividend policy does not commit the Board of Directors to declare future dividends. Each future dividend will be considered and declared by the Board of Directors at its discretion. Whether the Board of Directors continues to declare dividends and repurchase shares depends on a number of factors, including our future financial condition, anticipated profitability and cash flows and compliance with the terms of our credit facilities. Our current maturities of long-term debt and capital lease obligations at ~~October 4, 2014~~April 25, 2015 are ~~$7.3~~$19.0 million. Our ability to borrow additional funds is governed by the terms of our credit facilities.

Net cash used in discontinued operations contains the net cash flows of our discontinued operations and consists primarily of ~~insurance run-off claims and~~ facility maintenance expenditures.

Our principal sources of liquidity are cash flows generated from operations and our senior secured credit facility which has maximum available credit of $1.0 billion. As of ~~October 4, 2014,~~April 25, 2015, our senior secured revolving credit facility and senior secured term loan had outstanding borrowings of ~~$437.7 million; additional~~$418.2 million. Additional available borrowings under our $1.0 billion credit facility are based on stipulated advance rates on eligible assets, as defined in the credit agreement. The credit agreement requires that SpartanNash maintain excess availability of 10 percent of the borrowing base as such term is defined in the credit agreement. SpartanNash had excess availability after the 10 percent covenant of ~~$372.6~~$370.3 million at ~~October 4, 2014.~~April 25, 2015. Payment of dividends and repurchases of outstanding shares are permitted, provided that certain levels of excess availability are maintained. The credit facility provides for the issuance of letters of credit, of which ~~$11.5~~$12.6 million were outstanding as of ~~October 4, 2014.~~April 25, 2015. The revolving credit facility matures ~~November 2018,~~January 2020, and is secured by substantially all of our assets. We believe that cash generated from operating activities and available borrowings under the credit facility will be sufficient to meet anticipated requirements for working capital, capital expenditures, dividend payments, and senior note debt redemption and debt service obligations for the foreseeable future. However, there can be no assurance that our business will continue to generate cash flow at or above current levels or that we will maintain our ability to borrow under our credit facility.

Our current ratio ~~increased~~decreased to ~~1.77:~~1.86:1.00 at ~~October 4, 2014~~April 25, 2015 from ~~1.76:~~1.90:1.00 at ~~December 28, 2013~~January 3, 2015 and our investment in working capital ~~increased~~decreased to ~~$421.7~~$424.5 million at ~~October 4, 2014~~April 25, 2015 from ~~$398.2~~$433.2 million at ~~December 28, 2013.~~January 3, 2015. Our net debt to total capital ratio decreased to ~~0.42:~~0.41:1.00 at ~~October 4, 2014~~April 25, 2015 versus ~~0.46:~~0.43:1.00 at ~~December 28, 2013.~~January 3, 2015.

Total net debt is a non-GAAP financial measure that is defined as long term debt and capital lease obligations plus current maturities of long-term debt and capital lease obligations less cash and cash equivalents. The Company believes investors find the information useful because it reflects the amount of long term debt obligations that are not covered by available cash and temporary investments.

Following is a reconciliation of long-term debt and capital lease obligations to total net long-term debt and capital lease obligations as of ~~October 4, 2014~~April 25, 2015 and ~~December 28, 2013.~~January 3, 2015.

	October 4, 2014			December 28, 2013			April 25, 2015			January 3, 2015
Current maturities of long-term debt and capital lease obligations	$	7,349		$	7,345		$	19,019		$	19,758
Long-term debt and capital lease obligations		549,530			598,319			516,237			550,510
Total debt		556,879			605,664			535,256			570,268
Cash and cash equivalents		(8,048	)		(9,216	)		(8,475	)		(6,443	)
Total net long-term debt	$	548,831		$	596,448		$	526,781		$	563,825

For information on contractual obligations, see our ~~Transition Report on~~ Form 10-K for the ~~39 week period~~fiscal year ended ~~December 28, 2013.~~January 3, 2015. At ~~October 4, 2014,~~April 25, 2015, there have been no material changes to our significant contractual obligations outside the ordinary course of business.

For purposes of calculating the ratio of earnings to fixed charges under the terms of ~~tour~~our Senior Notes, earnings consist of net earnings, as adjusted under the terms of the Senior Notes indenture, plus income tax expense, fixed charges and non-cash charges, less cash payments relating to non-cash charges added back to net earnings in prior periods. Fixed charges consist of interest cost, including capitalized interest, and amortization of debt issue costs. Our ratio of earnings to fixed charges was ~~9.50:~~9.70:1.00 for the four quarters ended ~~October 4, 2014.~~April 25, 2015.

We have also made certain commercial commitments that extend beyond ~~October 4, 2014.~~April 25, 2015. These commitments consist primarily of standby letters of credit of ~~$11.5~~$12.6 million as of ~~October 4, 2014.~~April 25, 2015.

This discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is based upon our consolidated financial statements. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to bad debts, inventories, intangible assets, long-lived assets, income taxes, self-insurance reserves, restructuring costs, retirement benefits, stock-based compensation and contingencies and litigation. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions and factors that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Based on our ongoing review, we make adjustments we consider appropriate under the facts and circumstances. We have discussed the development, selection and disclosure of these estimates with the Audit Committee. The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements are prepared using the same critical accounting policies discussed in our ~~Transition Report on~~ Form 10-K for the ~~39 week period~~fiscal year ended ~~December 28, 2013.~~January 3, 2015.

On April 10, 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) ~~No.~~ 2014-08 “Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity.” ASU ~~No.~~ 2014-08 ~~changes~~changed the criteria for reporting discontinued operations and ~~modifies~~modified related disclosure requirements. The ~~new guidance is effective on a prospective basis for~~Company adopted ASU 2014-08 in the first quarter of fiscal ~~years beginning after December 15, 2014, and interim periods within those years. We are currently assessing the potential impact~~2015. Adoption of ASU ~~No.~~ 2014-08 did not have a material impact on ~~our financial statements.~~the Consolidated Financial Statements.

On May 28, 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers,” which provides guidance for revenue recognition. The new guidance contained in the ASU affects any reporting organization that either enters into contracts with customers to transfer goods or services or enters into contracts for the transfer of nonfinancial assets unless those contracts are within the scope of other standards. The standard’s core principle is that a company will recognize revenue when it transfers promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. ~~This~~On April 29, 2015, the FASB issued a one-year deferral of the effective date of this new guidance, ~~will be~~which would result in the guidance being effective for the Company in the first quarter of its fiscal year ending December ~~30, 2017.~~29, 2018. Adoption is allowed by either the full retrospective or modified retrospective approach. We are currently in the process of evaluating the impact of adoption of this ~~ASU~~ASC on our Consolidated Financial Statements.

There have been no material changes in market risk of SpartanNash from the information provided under Part II, Item 7A, “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk”, of the Company’s ~~Transition~~Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended ~~December 28, 2013.~~January 3, 2015.

An evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of SpartanNash’s disclosure controls and procedures (as currently defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) was performed as of ~~October 4, 2014~~April 25, 2015 (the “Evaluation Date”). This evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of SpartanNash’s management, including its Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) and Interim Chief Accounting Officer (“CAO”). SpartanNash’s management, including the CEO, CFO and Interim CAO, concluded that SpartanNash’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the Evaluation Date to ensure that material information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 is accumulated and communicated to management, including our principal executive and principal financial officers as appropriate to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure. During the ~~third~~first quarter there was no change in SpartanNash’s internal control over financial reporting that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, SpartanNash’s internal control over financial reporting.

The information regarding the Putative Class Actions set forth in Note 76 “Commitments and Contingencies” to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements set forth under Item 1 of this report is incorporated herein by reference.

We source the products we sell from a wide variety of vendors. We generally do not have long-term written contracts with our major suppliers that would require them to continue supplying us with merchandise. We depend on our vendors for, among other things, appropriate allocation of merchandise, assortments of products, operation of vendor-focused shopping experiences within our stores, and funding for various forms of promotional allowances. There has been significant consolidation in the food industry, and this consolidation may continue to our commercial disadvantage. Such changes could have a material adverse impact on our revenues and profitability.

The following table provides information regarding SpartanNash’s purchases of its own common stock during the 1216 week period ended ~~October 4, 2014.~~April 25, 2015. On May 17, 2011, the Board of Directors authorized a five-year share repurchase program for up to $50 million of the SpartanNash’s common stock. The approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the repurchase plan was ~~$23.8~~$18.8 million as of ~~October 4, 2014.~~April 25, 2015. All employee transactions are under associate stock compensation plans. These may include: (1) shares of SpartanNash common stock delivered in satisfaction of the exercise price and/or tax withholding obligations by holders of employee stock options who exercised options, and (2) shares submitted for cancellation to satisfy tax withholding obligations that occur upon the vesting of the restricted shares. The value of the shares delivered or withheld is determined by the applicable stock compensation plan.

					Total
					Number		Average
					of Shares		Price Paid
Period	Total Number of Shares Purchased		Average Price Paid per Share		Purchased		per Share
July 13, 2014 – August 9, 2014
January 3 – January 31, 2015
Employee Transactions		—	$	—		—	$	—
Repurchase Program		—	$	—		—	$	—
August 10, 2014 – September 6, 2014
February 1 – February 28, 2015
Employee Transactions		—	$	—		30,567	$	25.78
Repurchase Program		63,800	$	21.57		—	$	—
September 7, 2014 – October 4, 2014
March 1 – March 28, 2015
Employee Transactions		—	$	—		—	$	—
Repurchase Program		57,200	$	19.51		—	$	—
Total for Quarter ended October 4, 2014
March 29 – April 25, 2015
Employee Transactions		—	$	—		—	$	—
Repurchase Program		121,000	$	20.60		79,400	$	31.80
Total for Quarter ended April 25, 2015
Employee Transactions						30,567	$	25.78
Repurchase Program						79,400	$	31.80

The following documents are filed as exhibits to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q:

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Michigan		38-0593940
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

850 76^th Street, S.W. P.O. Box 8700 Grand Rapids, Michigan		49518
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)		(Zip Code)

Large accelerated filer	¨x	Accelerated filer	x¨

Non-accelerated filer	¨	Smaller Reporting Company	¨

(In thousands)	Initial Valuation		2014 Adjustments to Fair Value			October 4, 2014
Current assets	$	790,296	$	(2,866	)	$	787,430
Property and equipment		369,495		(22,995	)		346,500
Goodwill		43,584		(6,962	)		36,622
Intangible assets		10,750		17,800			28,550
Other		38,160		—			38,160
Total assets acquired		1,252,285		(15,023	)		1,237,262
Current liabilities		353,484		(11,263	)		342,221
Other long-term liabilities		81,047		(4,516	)		76,531
Long-term debt and capital lease obligations		438,140		756			438,896
Total liabilities assumed		872,671		(15,023	)		857,648
Net assets acquired	$	379,614	$	—		$	379,614

(In thousands)	Intangible Assets		Useful Life
Trade names	$	6,700		Indefinite
Customer lists		5,100		7 years
Customer relationships		12,100		20 years
Favorable leases		4,650		7 to 22 years
	$	28,550

(In thousands)	Retail			Food Distribution		Total
Balance at December 28, 2013:
Goodwill	$	254,438		$	131,348	$	385,786
Accumulated impairment charges		(86,600	)		—		(86,600	)
Goodwill, net		167,838			131,348		299,186
Other		(1,834	)		—		(1,834	)
Balance at October 4, 2014:
Goodwill		252,604			131,348		383,952
Accumulated impairment charges		(86,600	)		—		(86,600	)
Goodwill, net	$	166,004		$	131,348	$	297,352

~~Non-compete agreements~~			~~5.9 years~~
~~Favorable leases~~			~~16.7 years~~
~~Customer lists~~			~~7.2 years~~
~~Customer relationships~~			~~20.0 years~~
~~Trade names~~			~~7.0 years~~
~~Franchise fees and other~~			~~10.4 years~~

(In thousands)	Fiscal Year		Amortization Expense
		2014	$	3,413
		2015		3,156
		2016		2,622
		2017		2,397
		2018		2,033

(In thousands) 40 Weeks Ended	Cash Balance Pension Plan						Super Foods Pension Plan
	October 4, 2014			October 12, 2013			October 4, 2014
Interest cost	$	1,854		$	1,804		$	1,536
Expected return on plan assets		(2,891	)		(3,241	)		(1,773	)
Recognized actuarial net loss		761			995			—
Net periodic income	$	(276	)	$	(442	)	$	(237	)
Settlement expense		783			—			—
Total expense (income)	$	507		$	(442	)	$	(237	)

	Shares Under Options			Weighted Average Exercise Price		Restricted Stock Awards			Weighted Average Grant-Date Fair Value
Outstanding at December 28, 2013		586,766		$	19.30		518,835		$	23.56
Granted		—			—		317,576			22.63
Exercised/Vested		(64,120	)		12.17		(219,894	)		16.41
Cancelled/Forfeited		(4,131	)		3.25		(11,840	)		21.82
Outstanding at October 4, 2014		518,515		$	20.31		604,677		$	23.09
Vested and expected to vest in the future at October 4, 2014		518,515		$	20.31
Exercisable at October 4, 2014		518,515		$	20.31

	October 4, 2014		December 28, 2013*
Total Assets
Military	$	480,599	$	451,518
Food Distribution		810,725		805,468
Retail		695,192		721,898
Discontinued operations		4,753		4,767
Total	$	1,991,269	$	1,983,651

Exhibit Number		Document

2.1		Agreement and Plan of Merger dated July 21, 2013. Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K on July 22, 2013. Here incorporated by reference.

3.1		Restated Articles of Incorporation of SpartanNash Company, as amended. Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 12, 2014, filed on August 14, 2014. Here incorporated by reference.

3.2		Bylaws of SpartanNash Company, as amended. Previously filed as an exhibit to Spartan Stores’ Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 10, 2011, filed on November 10, 2011. Here incorporated by reference.

4.1		Indenture dated December 6, 2012 by and among SpartanNash Company, The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as Trustee, and the Company’s subsidiaries as Guarantors. Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K on December 6, 2012. Here incorporated by reference.

4.2		Form of 6.625% Senior Notes Due 2016. Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K on December 6, 2012. Here incorporated by reference.

10.1		Form of Restricted Stock Award to Non-Employee Directors.

10.2		Form of Restricted Stock Award to Executive Officers.

10.3		Form of 2015 Long-Term Executive Cash Incentive Award.

10.4		Amendment No. 1 to Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement, dated January 9, 2015, among SpartanNash Company and certain of its subsidiaries, as borrowers, and Wells Fargo Capital Finance, LLC, as administrative agent, and certain lenders from time to time party thereto. Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 12, 2015. Incorporated herein by reference.

31.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.3		Certification of Chief Accounting Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1		Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

101.INS		XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

101.CAL		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

101.LAB		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document

101.PRE		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

101.DEF		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

	October 4, 2014				December 28, 2013
(In thousands)	Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization		Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization
Non-compete agreements	$	2,527	$	1,732	$	4,566	$	3,427
Favorable leases		8,408		2,601		8,408		2,215
Pharmacy customer script lists		17,223		10,951		17,423		8,946
Customer relationships		12,100		597		12,100		78
Trade names		1,219		408		1,219		233
Franchise fees and other		400		165		370		129
Total	$	41,877	$	16,454	$	44,086	$	15,028