Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated ~~filer”~~filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and ~~“smaller reporting~~“emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒

As of ~~October~~July 25, ~~2016,~~2017, there were ~~32,840,726~~31,832,131 shares of Class A common stock and 12,029,375 shares of Class B common stock outstanding.

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains, and written or oral statements made from time to time by us or by our authorized officers may contain, “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements address our future objectives, plans and goals, as well as our intent, beliefs and current expectations regarding future operating performance, results and events, and can generally be identified by words such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “believe,” “expect,” “estimate,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “plan,” “foresee” and other similar words or phrases.

These forward-looking statements are based on our current estimates and assumptions and involve various risks and uncertainties. As a result, you are cautioned that these forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance, and that actual results could differ materially from those projected in these forward-looking statements. Factors which may cause actual results to differ materially from our projections include those risks described in “Item ~~1A:~~1A. Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016 and elsewhere in this report, as well as:

These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this report or when made, and we undertake no obligation to revise or update these statements to reflect subsequent events or circumstances, except as required under the federal securities laws and the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,						Three Months Ended June 30,							Six Months Ended June 30,
	2016			2015			2016			2015			2017				2016			2017			2016
	(Dollars and shares in thousands, except per share amounts)												(Dollars and shares in thousands, except per share amounts)

Revenues:
New vehicles	$	1,375,144		$	1,368,029		$	3,826,178		$	3,865,639		$	1,275,069			$	1,286,464		$	2,447,001		$	2,451,034
Used vehicles		660,974			652,058			1,881,514			1,904,594			641,891				622,186			1,276,364			1,220,540
Wholesale vehicles		70,522			37,971			153,141			120,760			40,765				38,245			87,076			82,620
Total vehicles		2,106,640			2,058,058			5,860,833			5,890,993			1,957,725				1,946,895			3,810,441			3,754,194
Parts, service and collision repair		361,709			350,520			1,059,093			1,019,878			361,113				351,329			713,156			697,384
Finance, insurance and other, net		89,579			85,830			254,940			242,792			86,908		��		84,088			169,971			165,361
Total revenues		2,557,928			2,494,408			7,174,866			7,153,663			2,405,746				2,382,312			4,693,568			4,616,939
Cost of Sales:
New vehicles		(1,312,756	)		(1,302,594	)		(3,639,500	)		(3,671,919	)		(1,212,547	)			(1,220,598	)		(2,326,201	)		(2,326,744	)
Used vehicles		(621,352	)		(610,328	)		(1,764,393	)		(1,781,323	)		(601,856	)			(585,217	)		(1,195,497	)		(1,143,041	)
Wholesale vehicles		(73,029	)		(40,452	)		(158,566	)		(126,126	)		(42,682	)			(40,084	)		(90,163	)		(85,537	)
Total vehicles		(2,007,137	)		(1,953,374	)		(5,562,459	)		(5,579,368	)		(1,857,085	)			(1,845,899	)		(3,611,861	)		(3,555,322	)
Parts, service and collision repair		(191,706	)		(180,783	)		(554,867	)		(523,531	)		(188,043	)			(183,108	)		(370,742	)		(363,162	)
Total cost of sales		(2,198,843	)		(2,134,157	)		(6,117,326	)		(6,102,899	)		(2,045,128	)			(2,029,007	)		(3,982,603	)		(3,918,484	)
Gross profit		359,085			360,251			1,057,540			1,050,764			360,618				353,305			710,965			698,455
Selling, general and administrative expenses		(282,141	)		(280,041	)		(843,721	)		(835,564	)		(293,931	)			(277,204	)		(586,165	)		(561,580	)
Impairment charges		(6,089	)		(37	)		(6,240	)		(16,698	)		(2,605	)			(151	)		(3,115	)		(151	)
Depreciation and amortization		(19,928	)		(17,250	)		(57,302	)		(50,953	)		(21,911	)			(18,905	)		(43,065	)		(37,374	)
Operating income (loss)		50,927			62,923			150,277			147,549			42,171				57,045			78,620			99,350
Other income (expense):
Interest expense, floor plan		(6,672	)		(5,364	)		(19,797	)		(15,488	)		(9,144	)			(6,690	)		(17,531	)		(13,126	)
Interest expense, other, net		(13,016	)		(12,361	)		(37,560	)		(38,635	)		(12,764	)			(12,205	)		(26,172	)		(24,544	)
Other income (expense), net		11			-			120			102			7				6			(14,495	)		110
Total other income (expense)		(19,677	)		(17,725	)		(57,237	)		(54,021	)		(21,901	)			(18,889	)		(58,198	)		(37,560	)
Income (loss) from continuing operations before taxes		31,250			45,198			93,040			93,528			20,270				38,156			20,422			61,790
Provision for income taxes for continuing operations - benefit (expense)		(12,281	)		(18,095	)		(36,565	)		(36,944	)		(7,956	)			(15,113	)		(8,128	)		(24,283	)
Income (loss) from continuing operations		18,969			27,103			56,475			56,584			12,314				23,043			12,294			37,507
Discontinued operations:
Income (loss) from discontinued operations before taxes		(1,413	)		(999	)		(1,513	)		(2,200	)		(301	)			(362	)		(1,168	)		(100	)
Provision for income taxes for discontinued operations - benefit (expense)		555			401			595			869			119				141			465			39
Income (loss) from discontinued operations		(858	)		(598	)		(918	)		(1,331	)		(182	)			(221	)		(703	)		(61	)
Net income (loss)	$	18,111		$	26,505		$	55,557		$	55,253		$	12,132			$	22,822		$	11,591		$	37,446

Basic earnings (loss) per common share:
Earnings (loss) per share from continuing operations	$	0.42		$	0.54		$	1.23		$	1.12		$	0.28			$	0.50		$	0.27		$	0.81
Earnings (loss) per share from discontinued operations		(0.02	)		(0.01	)		(0.02	)		(0.03	)		(0.01	)			-			(0.01	)		-
Earnings (loss) per common share	$	0.40		$	0.53		$	1.21		$	1.09		$	0.27			$	0.50		$	0.26		$	0.81
Weighted average common shares outstanding		45,118			50,456			45,930			50,697			44,570				45,731			44,680			46,340

Diluted earnings (loss) per common share:
Earnings (loss) per share from continuing operations	$	0.42		$	0.53		$	1.22		$	1.11		$	0.27			$	0.50		$	0.27		$	0.81
Earnings (loss) per share from discontinued operations		(0.02	)		(0.01	)		(0.02	)		(0.03	)		-				-			(0.01	)		(0.01	)
Earnings (loss) per common share	$	0.40		$	0.52		$	1.20		$	1.08		$	0.27			$	0.50		$	0.26		$	0.80
Weighted average common shares outstanding		45,354			50,769			46,130			51,086			44,810				45,924			44,976			46,523

Dividends declared per common share	$	0.05		$	0.025		$	0.15		$	0.075		$	0.05			$	0.05		$	0.10		$	0.10

	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,						Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2016			2015			2016			2015			2017			2016			2017			2016
	(In thousands)												(In thousands)
Net income (loss)	$	18,111		$	26,505		$	55,557		$	55,253		$	12,132		$	22,822		$	11,591		$	37,446
Other comprehensive income (loss) before taxes:
Change in fair value of interest rate swap agreements		4,197			(4,221	)		(3,479	)		(4,271	)		42			(2,798	)		2,144			(7,676	)
Provision for income tax benefit (expense) related to components of other comprehensive income (loss)		(1,595	)		1,604			1,322			1,623			(16	)		1,063			(815	)		2,916
Other comprehensive income (loss)		2,602			(2,617	)		(2,157	)		(2,648	)		26			(1,735	)		1,329			(4,760	)
Comprehensive income (loss)	$	20,713		$	23,888		$	53,400		$	52,605		$	12,158		$	21,087		$	12,920		$	32,686

		September 30,			December 31,				June 30,			December 31,
		2016			2015				2017			2016
		(Dollars in thousands)							(Dollars in thousands)
ASSETS	ASSETS							ASSETS
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents		$	2,941		$	3,625			$	4,380		$	3,108
Receivables, net			299,254			378,520				289,820			430,242
Inventories			1,511,336			1,599,581				1,622,338			1,570,701
Assets held for sale			6,347			-
Other current assets			37,603			101,386				43,622			26,993
Total current assets			1,857,481			2,083,112				1,960,160			2,031,044
Property and Equipment, net			978,008			886,902				1,087,369			1,010,380
Goodwill			473,161			471,493				471,493			472,437
Other Intangible Assets, net			80,394			80,876				79,911			80,233
Other Assets			40,147			39,998				46,223			45,242
Total Assets		$	3,429,191		$	3,562,381			$	3,645,156		$	3,639,336


LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY	LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY							LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current Liabilities:
Notes payable - floor plan - trade		$	762,887		$	893,466			$	802,255		$	850,537
Notes payable - floor plan - non-trade			588,619			625,367				679,075			675,353
Trade accounts payable			108,210			131,204				123,010			117,740
Accrued interest			12,987			12,640				11,924			13,265
Other accrued liabilities			236,883			218,507				221,389			236,982
Current maturities of long-term debt			43,241			33,437				67,231			43,003
Total current liabilities			1,752,827			1,914,621				1,904,884			1,936,880
Long-Term Debt			842,894			781,145				887,327			839,675
Other Long-Term Liabilities			66,876			64,245				63,037			61,170
Deferred Income Taxes			81,150			73,322				76,498			76,447
Commitments and Contingencies
Stockholders’ Equity:
Class A convertible preferred stock, none issued			-			-				-			-
Class A common stock, $0.01 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized; 62,956,894 shares issued and 32,840,726 shares outstanding at September 30, 2016; 62,586,381 shares issued and 37,910,938 shares outstanding at December 31, 2015			630			626
Class B common stock, $0.01 par value; 30,000,000 shares authorized; 12,029,375 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015			121			121
Class A common stock, $0.01 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized; 63,455,509 shares issued and 31,832,131 shares outstanding at June 30, 2017; 62,967,061 shares issued and 32,703,865 shares outstanding at December 31, 2016										635			630
Class B common stock, $0.01 par value; 30,000,000 shares authorized; 12,029,375 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016										121			121
Paid-in capital			720,416			713,118				727,459			721,695
Retained earnings			505,747			457,010				548,242			541,146
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)			(7,789	)		(5,632	)			(933	)		(2,262	)
Treasury stock, at cost; 30,116,168 Class A common stock shares held at September 30, 2016 and 24,675,443 Class A common stock shares held at December 31, 2015			(533,681	)		(436,195	)
Treasury stock, at cost; 31,623,378 Class A common stock shares held at June 30, 2017 and 30,263,196 Class A common stock shares held at December 31, 2016										(562,114	)		(536,166	)
Total Stockholders’ Equity			685,444			729,048				713,410			725,164
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity		$	3,429,191		$	3,562,381			$	3,645,156		$	3,639,336

Accumulated

Class A

Class A

Class B

Other

Total

Common Stock

Treasury Stock

Common Stock

Paid-In

Retained

Comprehensive

Stockholders’

Shares

Amount

Shares

Amount

Shares

Amount

Capital

Earnings

Income (Loss)

Equity

(In thousands)

Balance at December 31, 2015

62,586

$
626

(24,675
)

$
(436,195
)

12,029

$
121

$
713,118

$
457,010

$
(5,632
)

$
729,048

Shares awarded under stock compensation plans

371

4

-

-

-

-

5

-

-

9

Purchases of treasury stock

-

-

(5,441
)

(97,486
)

-

-

-

-

-

(97,486
)
Income tax expense associated with stock compensation plans

-

-

-

-

-

-

(1,101
)

-

-

(1,101
)
Change in fair value of interest rate swap agreements, net of tax benefit of $1,322

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

(2,157
)

(2,157
)
Restricted stock amortization

-

-

-

-

-

-

8,394

-

-

8,394

Net income (loss)

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

55,557

-

55,557

Dividends declared ($0.15 per share)

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

(6,820
)

-

(6,820
)
Balance at September 30, 2016

62,957

$
630

(30,116
)

$
(533,681
)

12,029

$
121

$
720,416

$
505,747

$
(7,789
)

$
685,444

																				Accumulated
	Class A				Class A						Class B									Other			Total
	Common Stock				Treasury Stock						Common Stock				Paid-In		Retained			Comprehensive			Stockholders’
	Shares		Amount		Shares			Amount			Shares		Amount		Capital		Earnings			Income (Loss)			Equity
	(In thousands)
Balance at December 31, 2016		62,967	$	630		(30,263	)	$	(536,166	)		12,029	$	121	$	721,695	$	541,146		$	(2,262	)	$	725,164
Shares awarded under stock compensation plans		489		5		-			-			-		-		41		-			-			46
Purchases of treasury stock		-		-		(1,360	)		(25,948	)		-		-		-		-			-			(25,948	)
Change in fair value of interest rate swap agreements, net of tax expense of $815		-		-		-			-			-		-		-		-			1,329			1,329
Restricted stock amortization		-		-		-			-			-		-		5,723		-			-			5,723
Net income (loss)		-		-		-			-			-		-		-		11,591			-			11,591
Dividends declared		-		-		-			-			-		-		-		(4,495	)		-			(4,495	)
Balance at June 30, 2017		63,456	$	635		(31,623	)	$	(562,114	)		12,029	$	121	$	727,459	$	548,242		$	(933	)	$	713,410

	Nine Months Ended September 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2016			2015			2017			2016
	(In thousands)						(In thousands)
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income (loss)	$	55,557		$	55,253		$	11,591		$	37,446
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization of property, plant and equipment		57,298			50,948			43,062			37,371
Provision for bad debt expense		260			1,633			495			248
Other amortization		487			487			325			325
Debt issuance cost amortization		1,886			1,456			1,193			1,250
Debt discount amortization, net of premium amortization		226			127			99			150
Stock-based compensation expense		8,394			7,409			5,723			5,634
Deferred income taxes		8,004			16,837			182			11,192
Net distributions from equity investee		(123	)		(53	)		190			35
Asset impairment charges		6,240			16,698			3,115			151
Loss (gain) on disposal of dealerships and property and equipment		(245	)		(699	)		(67	)		(149	)
Loss (gain) on exit of leased dealerships		1,109			1,485			1,827			(139	)
(Gain) loss on retirement of debt								14,607			-
Changes in assets and liabilities that relate to operations:
Receivables		85,708			76,888			144,029			70,389
Inventories		94,910			(110,732	)		(51,637	)		9,365
Other assets		63,763			(20,532	)		(19,837	)		46,560
Notes payable - floor plan - trade		(130,579	)		50,413			(48,282	)		(106,336	)
Trade accounts payable and other liabilities		(11,362	)		(15,953	)		(13,732	)		(6,773	)
Total adjustments		185,976			76,412			81,292			69,273
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		241,533			131,665			92,883			106,719
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchase of businesses, net of cash acquired		(15,861	)		-
Purchases of land, property and equipment		(155,060	)		(127,098	)		(121,222	)		(108,970	)
Proceeds from sales of property and equipment		1,050			1,256			291			887
Proceeds from sales of dealerships		-			1,250
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		(169,871	)		(124,592	)		(120,931	)		(108,083	)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Net (repayments) borrowings on notes payable - floor plan - non-trade		(36,748	)		(29,194	)		3,722			29,915
Borrowings on revolving credit facilities		183,275			309,409			44,017			155,208
Repayments on revolving credit facilities		(187,478	)		(306,163	)		(44,017	)		(159,411	)
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt		99,592			65,075			282,458			76,409
Debt issuance costs		(216	)		-			(4,512	)		(293	)
Principal payments and repurchase of long-term debt		(25,735	)		(14,280	)		(11,051	)		(9,633	)
Repurchase of debt securities								(210,914	)		-
Purchases of treasury stock		(97,486	)		(32,040	)		(25,948	)		(87,504	)
Income tax benefit (expense) associated with stock compensation plans		(1,101	)		416			-			(364	)
Issuance of shares under stock compensation plans		9			1,839			46			6
Dividends paid		(6,458	)		(3,824	)		(4,481	)		(4,175	)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		(72,346	)		(8,762	)		29,320			158
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS		(684	)		(1,689	)		1,272			(1,206	)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD		3,625			4,182
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF YEAR								3,108			3,625
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD	$	2,941		$	2,493		$	4,380		$	2,419


SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULE OF NON-CASH FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Change in fair value of cash flow interest rate swap agreements (net of tax benefit of $1,322 and
$1,623 in the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively)	$	(2,157	)	$	(2,648	)
Change in fair value of cash flow interest rate swap agreements (net of tax expense of $815
and benefit of $2,916 in the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively)							$	1,329		$	(4,760	)
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Cash paid (received) during the period for:
Interest, including amount capitalized	$	57,149		$	53,694		$	44,897		$	37,576
Income taxes	$	26,922		$	21,718		$	12,664		$	10,875

Basis of Presentation – The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements of Sonic Automotive, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries (“Sonic,” the “Company,” “we,” “us” and “our”) for the three and ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015,~~2016 are unaudited and have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”) for interim financial information and applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements reflect, in the opinion of management, all material normal recurring adjustments necessary to fairly state the financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented. The operating results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the entire fiscal year or future interim periods, because the first quarter normally contributes less operating profit than the second, third and fourth quarters. These interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the ~~audited~~ consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto included in Sonic’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2015.~~2016.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements – In ~~February 2016,~~May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ~~(“FASB”~~(the “FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2014-09 to amend the accounting guidance on revenue recognition. The amendments in this ASU are intended to provide a more robust framework for addressing revenue issues, improve comparability of revenue recognition practices and improve disclosure requirements. The amendments in this ASU must be applied using either of the following transition methods: (i) a full retrospective approach reflecting the application of the standard in each prior reporting period with the option to elect certain practical expedients, or (ii) a modified retrospective approach with the cumulative effect of initially adopting the standard recognized at the date of adoption (which requires additional footnote disclosures). This ASU is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Earlier application is permitted only as of reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. Sonic plans to adopt this ASU effective January 1, 2018 and anticipates adopting a full retrospective transition approach. While management is still evaluating the specific financial statement impact and quantitative and qualitative disclosure impact of the provisions of this ASU, based on preliminary analysis, management expects similar performance obligations to result under this ASU as compared with deliverables and separate units of accounting currently identified. As a result, management expects the amounts and timing of revenue recognition to generally remain the same.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02 to increase transparency and comparability among organizations by recognizing lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet and disclosing key information about leasing arrangements. The amendments in this ASU require that leases are classified as either finance or operating leases, a right-of-use asset and lease liability is recognized in the statement of financial position, and repayments are classified within operating activities in the statement of cash flows. ~~For public companies,~~The amendments in this ASU isare to be applied using a modified retrospective approach and are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018 (early adoption is permitted). ~~Upon~~Sonic plans to adopt this ASU effective January 1, 2019. While management is still evaluating the impact of adopting the provisions of this ASU, management expects that upon adoption of this ASU, the presentation of certain items in Sonic’s consolidated financial position, cash flows and other disclosures will be materially impacted, primarily due to the recognition of a right-of-use asset and an associated liability and a change in the timing and classification of certain items in Sonic’s results of operations as a result of the derecognition of the lease liability.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09 to simplify several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions. For public companies, this ASU is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2016 (early adoption is permitted). Sonic adopted this ASU effective January 1, 2017. Upon adoption of this ASU, interim period and annual ~~period~~ income tax expense ~~will be~~is affected by stock option exercises and restricted stock ~~vestings.~~and restricted stock unit vesting activity, potentially creating volatility in Sonic’s effective income tax rate from period to period. See the heading “Income Tax Expense” below for further discussion of the impact of the adoption of this ASU on Sonic’s effective income tax rate for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15 related to the classification of certain cash receipts and cash payments on the statement of cash flows. For public companies, this ASU is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2017 (early adoption is permitted). Sonic plans to adopt this ASU effective January 1, 2018. Upon adoption of this ASU, the presentation of certain items in Sonic’s cash flows and other disclosures may be impacted.

Principles of Consolidation – All of Sonic’s subsidiaries are wholly owned and consolidated in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements, except for one 50% ~~- owned~~-owned dealership that is accounted for under the equity method. All material intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements.

Lease Exit Accruals – Lease exit accruals relate to facilities Sonic has ceased using in its operations that remain subject to a current lease agreement. The accruals represent the present value of the lease payments, net of estimated or actual sublease proceeds, for the remaining life of the operating leases and other accruals necessary to satisfy the lease commitment to the landlord. These situations could include the relocation of an existing facility or the sale of a dealership ~~where~~when the buyer will not be subleasing the property for either the remaining term of the lease or for an amount of rent equal to Sonic’s obligation under the lease, or situations in ~~situations where~~which a store is closed as a result of the associated franchise being terminated by Sonic or the manufacturer and no other operations continue on the leased property. See Note 12, “Commitments and Contingencies,” to the consolidated financial statements in Sonic’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016 for further discussion.

A summary of the activity of these operating lease exit accruals consists of the following:

Income Tax Expense – The overall effective tax rate from continuing operations was 39.3% ~~for both the three~~ and ~~nine months ended September 30, 2016, and was 40.0% and 39.5%~~39.8% for the three and ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2015,~~2017, respectively, and was 39.6% and 39.3% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, respectively. Income tax expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 includes a benefit of approximately $0.2 million and $0.5 million, respectively, as a result of the adoption of ASU 2016-09 discussed above. Sonic’s effective tax rate varies from year to year based on the distribution of taxable income between states in which Sonic operates and other tax adjustments. Sonic expects the effective tax rate in future periods to fall within a range of 38.0% to 40.0% before the impact, if any, of changes in valuation allowances related to deferred income tax assets or ~~unusual~~ discrete tax adjustments.

~~Acquisitions~~ – During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, Sonic acquired three stand-alone used vehicle dealership businesses and real estate for approximately $15.9 million. On a pro forma basis as if the results of these acquisitions had been included in Sonic’s consolidated results for the entire three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, revenue and net income would not have been materially different from Sonic’s reported revenue and net income for these periods. Sonic did not acquire or dispose of any franchises during the ~~nine~~three and six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2015.~~2017 and 2016.

~~Dispositions~~ –Revenues and other activities associated with dealerships classified as discontinued operations were as follows:

	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,						Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2016			2015			2016			2015			2017			2016			2017			2016
	(In thousands)												(In thousands)
Income (loss) from operations	$	(350	)	$	(383	)	$	(539	)	$	(1,029	)	$	(162	)	$	(135	)	$	(441	)	$	(327	)
Lease exit accrual adjustments and charges		(1,063	)		(616	)		(974	)		(1,171	)		(139	)		(227	)		(727	)		227
Pre-tax income (loss)	$	(1,413	)	$	(999	)	$	(1,513	)	$	(2,200	)	$	(301	)	$	(362	)	$	(1,168	)	$	(100	)
Total revenues	$	-		$	-		$	-		$	42		$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-

Sonic did not dispose of any franchises during the nine months ended September 30, 2016. Sonic disposed of one franchise during the nine months ended September 30, 2015 that generated net cash of approximately $1.3 million.

Revenues and other activities associated with disposed dealerships that remain in continuing operations were as follows:

	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,						Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2016			2015			2016			2015			2017			2016			2017			2016
	(In thousands)												(In thousands)
Income (loss) from operations	$	(41	)	$	(1,145	)	$	(313	)	$	(3,701	)	$	(16	)	$	(241	)	$	(43	)	$	(273	)
Gain (loss) on disposal		29			(542	)		(30	)		414			-			(11	)		(24	)		(58	)
Property and equipment impairment charges		-			-			-			(10,096	)
Pre-tax income (loss)	$	(12	)	$	(1,687	)	$	(343	)	$	(13,383	)	$	(16	)	$	(252	)	$	(67	)	$	(331	)
Total revenues	$	11		$	25,707		$	10		$	83,275		$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-

	September 30, 2016		December 31, 2015		June 30, 2017		December 31, 2016
	(In thousands)				(In thousands)
New vehicles	$	998,390	$	1,161,490	$	1,116,708	$	1,088,814
Used vehicles		322,466		251,103		301,283		282,288
Service loaners		125,731		121,946		133,552		128,821
Parts, accessories and other		64,749		65,042		70,795		70,778
Net inventories	$	1,511,336	$	1,599,581	$	1,622,338	$	1,570,701

	September 30, 2016			December 31, 2015			June 30, 2017			December 31, 2016
	(In thousands)						(In thousands)
Land	$	300,400		$	260,275		$	335,238		$	306,457
Building and improvements		748,627			679,712			836,976			777,766
Software and computer equipment		119,448			107,086			138,250			128,366
Parts and service equipment		88,909			79,219			102,301			93,901
Office equipment and fixtures		84,919			76,810			92,050			86,216
Company vehicles		9,077			8,478			9,542			9,107
Construction in progress		68,683			55,010			67,211			62,982
Total, at cost		1,420,063			1,266,590			1,581,568			1,464,795
Less accumulated depreciation		(435,708	)		(379,688	)		(490,710	)		(450,184	)
Subtotal		984,355			886,902			1,090,858			1,014,611
Less assets held for sale(1)		(6,347	)		-			(3,489	)		(4,231	)
Property and equipment, net	$	978,008		$	886,902		$	1,087,369		$	1,010,380

(1)Classified in other current assets in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets.

In the three and ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, capital expenditures were approximately ~~$46.1~~$45.5 million and ~~$155.1~~$121.2 million, respectively, and in the three and ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2015,~~2016, capital expenditures were approximately ~~$44.2~~$67.6 million and ~~$127.1~~$109.0 million, respectively. Capital expenditures in all periods were primarily related to real estate acquisitions, construction of new franchised dealerships and EchoPark^® stores, building improvements and equipment purchased for use in Sonic’s franchised dealerships and EchoPark^® stores. Assets held for sale as of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017 consists of vacant land that Sonic expects to dispose of in the next twelve months.

Impairment charges for the three and ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017 were approximately ~~$6.1~~$2.6 million and ~~$6.2~~$3.1 million, respectively. Impairment charges for the three months ended September 30, 2015 were immaterial and for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 were approximately $16.7 million. Impairment charges for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016respectively, which include the write-off of goodwill and property and equipment ~~to be demolished~~as part of the closure of two stand-alone pre-owned stores that were purchased in ~~conjunction with a facility construction project~~2016, and the write-off of costs associated with ~~abandonment of certain construction projects. Impairment charges for~~ the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 include the write-off of goodwill, intangible assets, property and equipment as part of the disposal of a franchise, the write-off of certain costs associated with website and software development projects as well as abandonment of certain construction projects.

Impairment charges for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 were approximately $0.2 million related to the write-off of costs associated with the abandonment of certain construction projects.

The carrying amount of goodwill was approximately ~~$473.2~~$471.5 million and ~~$471.5~~$472.4 million, respectively, as of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017 and December 31, ~~2015, respectively, reflecting a $1.7~~2016. Sonic impaired approximately $0.9 million ~~increase related to business acquisitions~~of goodwill in the three and six months ended ~~September~~June 30, 2017 related to the closure of two stand-alone pre-owned stores that were purchased in 2016. The carrying amount of goodwill is net of accumulated impairment losses of approximately $797.6 million and $796.7 million, respectively, as of ~~both September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017 and December 31, ~~2015.~~2016. The carrying amount of franchise assets was approximately $74.9 million as of both ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017 and December 31, ~~2015.~~2016.

At December 31, ~~2015,~~2016, Sonic had approximately ~~$6.0~~$5.3 million of definite life intangibles related to favorable lease agreements. After the effect of amortization of the definite life intangibles, the balance recorded at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017 was approximately ~~$5.5~~$5.0 million. Both franchise assets and favorable lease agreement assets are included in other intangible assets, net in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets.

	September 30, 2016			December 31, 2015			June 30, 2017			December 31, 2016
	(In thousands)						(In thousands)
2014 Revolving Credit Facility (1)	$	-		$	4,203
2016 Revolving Credit Facility (1)							$	-		$	-
7.0% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2022 (the “7.0% Notes”)		200,000			200,000			-			200,000
5.0% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2023 (the “5.0% Notes”) ~~(2)~~		289,273			300,000			289,273			289,273
6.125% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2027 (the “6.125% Notes”)								250,000			-
Mortgage notes to finance companies-fixed rate, bearing interest from 3.51% to 7.03%		178,910			168,410			199,856			176,369
Mortgage notes to finance companies-variable rate, bearing interest at 1.25 to 2.80 percentage points above one-month or three-month LIBOR		226,122			150,961			225,427			227,342
Net debt discount and premium (3)		(1,320	)		(1,562	)
Net debt discount and premium (2)								(58	)		(1,258	)
Debt issuance costs		(11,214	)		(12,884	)		(14,055	)		(13,328	)
Other		4,364			5,454			4,115			4,280
Total debt	$	886,135		$	814,582		$	954,558		$	882,678
Less current maturities		(43,241	)		(33,437	)		(67,231	)		(43,003	)
Long-term debt	$	842,894		$	781,145		$	887,327		$	839,675

On ~~July 23, 2014,~~November 30, 2016, Sonic entered into an amended and restated syndicated revolving credit facility (the ~~“2014~~“2016 Revolving Credit Facility”) and amended and restated syndicated new and used vehicle floor plan credit facilities (the ~~“2014~~“2016 Floor Plan Facilities” and, together with the ~~2014~~2016 Revolving Credit Facility, the ~~“2014~~“2016 Credit Facilities”), which are scheduled to mature on ~~August 15, 2019.~~November 30, 2021.

Availability under the ~~2014~~2016 Revolving Credit Facility is calculated as the lesser of ~~$225.0~~$250.0 million or a borrowing base calculated based on certain eligible assets, ~~(the “Revolving Borrowing Base”),~~ less the aggregate face amount of any outstanding letters of credit under the ~~2014~~2016 Revolving Credit ~~Facility.~~Facility (the “2016 Revolving Borrowing Base”). The ~~2014~~2016 Revolving Credit Facility may be increased at Sonic’s option up to ~~$275.0~~$300.0 million upon satisfaction of certain conditions. Based on balances as of ~~September~~June 30, 2017, the 2016 ~~the~~ Revolving Borrowing Base was approximately ~~$193.5~~$211.4 million. As of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, Sonic had no outstanding borrowings and approximately ~~$21.9~~$17.3 million in outstanding letters of credit under the ~~2014~~2016 Revolving Credit Facility, resulting in total borrowing availability of ~~approximately $171.6~~$194.1 million under the ~~2014~~2016 Revolving Credit Facility. ~~See Note 6, “Long-Term Debt,” to the consolidated financial statements in Sonic’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 for further discussion.~~

On July 2, 2012, Sonic issued $200.0 million in aggregate principal amount of unsecured senior subordinated 7.0% Notes which were scheduled to mature on July 15, 2022. The 7.0% Notes were issued at a price of 99.11% of the principal amount thereof, resulting in a yield to maturity of 7.125%. Interest on the 7.0% Notes iswas payable semi-annually in arrears on January 15 and July 15 of each year. ~~See Note 6, “Long-Term Debt,”~~

On March 27, 2017, Sonic repurchased all of the outstanding 7.0% Notes using net proceeds from the issuance of the 6.125% Notes. Sonic paid approximately $213.7 million in cash, including an early redemption premium and accrued and unpaid interest, to extinguish the 7.0% Notes and recognized a loss of approximately $14.6 million on the repurchase of the 7.0% Notes, recorded in other income (expense), net in the accompanying condensed consolidated ~~financial~~ statements ~~in Sonic’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 for further discussion.~~of income.

On May 9, 2013, Sonic issued $300.0 million in aggregate principal amount of unsecured senior subordinated 5.0% Notes which mature on May 15, 2023. The 5.0% Notes were issued at a price of 100.0% of the principal amount thereof. The 5.0% Notes are guaranteed by Sonic’s domestic operating subsidiaries. Interest on the 5.0% Notes is payable semi-annually in arrears on May 15 and November 15 of each year. ~~See Note 6, “Long-Term Debt,” to the consolidated financial statements in Sonic’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 for further discussion.~~

~~During the three months ended~~On September 30, 2016, Sonic repurchased approximately $10.7 million of its outstanding 5.0% Notes for approximately $10.6 million in cash, plus accrued and unpaid interest related thereto. See Note 6, “Long-Term Debt,” to the consolidated financial statements in Sonic’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016 for further discussion.

On March 10, 2017, Sonic issued $250.0 million in aggregate principal amount of unsecured senior subordinated 6.125% Notes which mature on March 15, 2027. The 6.125% Notes were issued at a price of 100.0% of the principal amount thereof. Sonic used the net proceeds from the issuance of the 6.125% Notes to repurchase all of the outstanding 7.0% Notes during the six months ended June 30, 2017. Remaining proceeds from the issuance of the 6.125% Notes will be used for general corporate purposes. The 6.125% Notes are guaranteed by Sonic’s domestic operating subsidiaries. Interest on the 6.125% Notes is payable semi-annually in arrears on March 15 and September 15 of each year. Sonic may redeem the 6.125% Notes, in whole or in part, at any time on or after March 15, 2022 at the following redemption prices, which are expressed as percentages of the principal amount:

Before March 15, 2022, Sonic may redeem all or a part of the 6.125% Notes at a redemption price equal to 100.0% of the principal amount of the 6.125% Notes redeemed plus the Applicable Premium (as defined in the indenture governing the 6.125% Notes) and any accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the redemption date. In addition, on or before March 15, 2020, Sonic may redeem up to 35% of the aggregate principal amount of the 6.125% Notes at a redemption price equal to 106.125% of the par value of the 6.125% Notes redeemed, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the redemption date with proceeds from certain equity offerings. The indenture governing the 6.125% Notes also provides that holders of the 6.125% Notes may require Sonic to repurchase the 6.125% Notes at a purchase price equal to 101.0% of the par value of the 6.125% Notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the date of purchase if Sonic undergoes a Change of Control (as defined in the indenture governing the 6.125% Notes).

The indenture governing the 6.125% Notes contains certain specified restrictive covenants. Sonic has agreed not to pledge any assets to any third-party lender of senior subordinated debt except under certain limited circumstances. Sonic also has agreed to certain other limitations or prohibitions concerning the incurrence of other indebtedness, guarantees, liens, certain types of investments, certain transactions with affiliates, mergers, consolidations, issuance of preferred stock, cash dividends to stockholders, distributions, redemptions and the sale, assignment, lease, conveyance or disposal of certain assets. Specifically, the indenture governing the 6.125% Notes limits Sonic’s ability to pay quarterly cash dividends on Sonic’s Class A and Class B common stock in excess of $0.12 per share. Sonic may only pay quarterly cash dividends on Sonic’s Class A and Class B common stock if Sonic complies with the

terms of the indenture governing the 6.125% Notes. Sonic was in compliance with all restrictive covenants in the indenture governing the 6.125% Notes as of June 30, 2017.

Sonic’s obligations under the 6.125% Notes may be accelerated by the holders of 25% of the outstanding principal amount of the 6.125% Notes then outstanding if certain events of default occur, including: (1) defaults in the payment of principal or interest when due; (2) defaults in the performance, or breach, of Sonic’s covenants under the 6.125% Notes; and (3) certain defaults under other agreements under which Sonic or its subsidiaries have outstanding indebtedness in excess of $50.0 million.

During the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, Sonic obtained approximately ~~$99.6~~$32.5 million in mortgage financing related to ~~nine~~six of its dealership properties. As of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, the weighted average interest rate was ~~3.61%~~4.01% and the total outstanding principal balance was approximately ~~$405.0~~$425.3 million, related to approximately ~~45%~~50% of Sonic’s operating locations. These mortgage notes require monthly payments of principal and interest through their respective maturities and are secured by the underlying properties. Maturity dates for these mortgage notes range between ~~2016~~2017 and 2033.

Sonic agreed under the 2016 Credit Facilities not to pledge any assets to any third party (other than those explicitly allowed under the amended terms of the 2016 Credit Facilities), including other lenders, subject to certain stated exceptions, including floor plan financing arrangements. In addition, the 2016 Credit Facilities contain certain negative covenants, including covenants which could restrict or prohibit the payment of dividends, capital expenditures and material dispositions of assets, as well as other customary covenants and default provisions.

Sonic was in compliance with the covenants under the ~~2014~~2016 Credit Facilities as of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016.~~2017. Financial covenants include required specified ratios (as each is defined in the ~~2014~~2016 Credit Facilities) of:

	Covenant						Covenant
	Minimum Consolidated Liquidity Ratio		Minimum Consolidated Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio		Maximum Consolidated Total Lease Adjusted Leverage Ratio		Minimum Consolidated Liquidity Ratio		Minimum Consolidated Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio		Maximum Consolidated Total Lease Adjusted Leverage Ratio

Required ratio		1.05		1.20		5.50		1.05		1.20		5.75
September 30, 2016 actual		1.16		1.70		4.32
June 30, 2017 actual								1.14		1.95		4.38

The ~~2014~~2016 Credit Facilities contain events of default, including cross defaults to other material indebtedness, change of control events and other events of default customary for syndicated commercial credit facilities. Upon the future occurrence of an event of default, Sonic could be required to immediately repay all outstanding amounts under the ~~2014~~2016 Credit Facilities.

After giving effect to the applicable restrictions on the payment of dividends under its debt agreements, as of June 30, 2017, Sonic had approximately $113.5 million of its net income and retained earnings free of such restrictions. Sonic was in compliance with all restrictive covenants as of June 30, 2017.

In addition, many of Sonic’s facility leases are governed by a guarantee agreement between the landlord and Sonic that contains financial and operating covenants. The financial covenants under the guarantee agreement are identical to those under the ~~2014~~2016 Credit Facilities with the exception of one financial covenant related to the ratio of EBTDAR to Rent (as defined in the guarantee agreement) with a required ratio of no less than 1.50 to 1.00. As of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, the ratio was ~~3.78~~3.88 to 1.00.

Sonic has interest rate cash flow swap agreements to effectively convert a portion of its LIBOR-based variable rate debt to a fixed rate. Under the terms of these cash flow swaps, interest rates reset monthly. The fair value of these swap positions at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017 was a net liability of approximately ~~$13.1~~$1.3 million, with ~~$5.6~~$1.8 million included in other accrued liabilities and ~~$7.5~~$1.9 million included in other long-term liabilities in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets, offset partially by an asset of approximately $2.4 million included in other assets in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. The fair value of these swap

positions at December 31, ~~2015~~2016 was a net liability of approximately ~~$10.0~~$3.7 million, with ~~$5.1~~$4.1 million included in other accrued liabilities and ~~$4.9~~$2.4 million included in other long-term liabilities in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets, offset partially by an asset of approximately $2.8 million included in other current assets and other assets in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets.

Under the terms of these cash flow swaps, Sonic will receive and pay interest based on the following:

Notional Amount	Notional Amount		Pay Rate		Receive Rate (1)	Maturing Date	Notional Amount		Pay Rate		Receive Rate (1)	Maturing Date
(In millions)	(In millions)						(In millions)
$	2.3			7.100%	one-month LIBOR + 1.50%	July 10, 2017	2.2			7.100%	one-month LIBOR + 1.50%	July 10, 2017
$	7.5			4.655%	one-month LIBOR	December 10, 2017	7.0			4.655%	one-month LIBOR	December 10, 2017
$	6.7	(2)		6.860%	one-month LIBOR + 1.25%	August 1, 2017	6.4	(2)		6.860%	one-month LIBOR + 1.25%	August 1, 2017
$	6.0	(2)		6.410%	one-month LIBOR + 1.25%	September 12, 2017	5.9	(2)		6.410%	one-month LIBOR + 1.25%	September 12, 2017
$	100.0			2.065%	one-month LIBOR	June 30, 2017	50.0			1.320%	one-month LIBOR	July 1, 2017
$	100.0			2.015%	one-month LIBOR	June 30, 2017	250.0	(3)		1.887%	one-month LIBOR	June 30, 2018
$	50.0			1.320%	one-month LIBOR	July 1, 2017	25.0			2.080%	one-month LIBOR	July 1, 2017
$	250.0	(3)		1.887%	one-month LIBOR	June 30, 2018	100.0			1.560%	one-month LIBOR	July 1, 2017
$	25.0			2.080%	one-month LIBOR	July 1, 2017	125.0			1.303%	one-month LIBOR	July 1, 2017
$	100.0			1.560%	one-month LIBOR	July 1, 2017	125.0	(4)		1.900%	one-month LIBOR	July 1, 2018
$	125.0			1.303%	one-month LIBOR	July 1, 2017	50.0	(5)		2.320%	one-month LIBOR	July 1, 2019
$	125.0	(4)		1.900%	one-month LIBOR	July 1, 2018	200.0	(5)		2.313%	one-month LIBOR	July 1, 2019
$	50.0	(5)		2.320%	one-month LIBOR	July 1, 2019	100.0	(6)		1.384%	one-month LIBOR	July 1, 2020
$	200.0	(5)		2.313%	one-month LIBOR	July 1, 2019	125.0	(5)		1.158%	one-month LIBOR	July 1, 2019
$	100.0	(6)		1.384%	one-month LIBOR	July 1, 2020	150.0	(6)		1.310%	one-month LIBOR	July 1, 2020
$	125.0	(5)		1.158%	one-month LIBOR	July 1, 2019	125.0	(4)		1.020%	one-month LIBOR	July 1, 2018
$	150.0	(6)		1.310%	one-month LIBOR	July 1, 2020
$	125.0	(4)		1.020%	one-month LIBOR	July 1, 2018

During the nine months ended September 30, 2016, Sonic entered into four forward-starting interest rate cash flow swap agreements with notional amounts of $100.0 million, $125.0 million, $150.0 million and $125.0 million. These interest rate swaps have been designated and qualify as cash flow hedges and, as a result, changes in the fair value of these swaps are recorded in other comprehensive income (loss) in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive income.

For the interest rate swaps not designated as cash flow hedges, the changes in the fair value of these swaps are recognized through earnings and are included in interest expense, other, net in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of income. For the three and ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016, these items were a benefit of approximately $0.2 million and $0.4 million, respectively, and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015,~~2017, these items were a benefit of approximately $0.1 million and ~~$0.4~~$0.3 million, respectively, and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, these items were a benefit of approximately $0.1 million and $0.2 million, respectively.

For the interest rate swaps that qualify as cash flow hedges, the changes in the fair value of these swaps are recorded in other comprehensive income (loss) in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive income and are disclosed in the supplemental schedule of non-cash financing activities in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of cash flows. The incremental interest expense (the difference between interest paid and interest received) related to these cash flow swaps was approximately ~~$1.5~~$0.7 million and ~~$4.1~~$1.9 million for the three and ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, respectively, and ~~$1.6~~$1.3 million and ~~$6.2~~$2.5 million for the three and ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2015,~~2016, respectively, and is included in interest expense, other, net in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of income and the interest paid amount is disclosed in the supplemental disclosures of cash flow information in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of cash flows. The estimated net expense expected to be reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) into results of operations during the next twelve months is approximately ~~$3.4~~$1.1 million.

The calculation of diluted earnings per share considers the potential dilutive effect of stock options and shares under Sonic’s stock compensation plans. Certain of Sonic’s non-vested restricted stock awards contain rights to receive non-forfeitable dividends and, thus, are considered participating securities and are included in the two-class method of computing earnings per share. The following tables illustrate the dilutive effect of such items on earnings per share for the three and ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015:~~

	Three Months Ended September 30, 2016																		Three Months Ended June 30, 2017
			Income (Loss)					Income (Loss)													Income (Loss)					Income (Loss)
			From Continuing					From Discontinued						Net							From Continuing					From Discontinued						Net
			Operations					Operations						Income (Loss)							Operations					Operations						Income (Loss)
	Weighted					Per					Per						Per		Weighted					Per					Per						Per
	Average					Share					Share						Share		Average					Share					Share						Share
	Shares		Amount			Amount		Amount			Amount			Amount			Amount		Shares		Amount			Amount		Amount			Amount			Amount			Amount
	(In thousands, except per share amounts)																		(In thousands, except per share amounts)

Earnings (loss) and shares		45,118	$	18,969				$	(858	)				$	18,111					44,570	$	12,314				$	(182	)				$	12,132
Effect of participating securities:
Non-vested restricted stock				(11	)				-						(11	)						(9	)				-						(9	)
Basic earnings (loss) and shares		45,118	$	18,958		$	0.42	$	(858	)	$	(0.02	)	$	18,100		$	0.40		44,570	$	12,305		$	0.28	$	(182	)	$	(0.01	)	$	12,123		$	0.27
Effect of dilutive securities:
Stock compensation plans		236																		240
Diluted earnings (loss) and shares		45,354	$	18,958		$	0.42	$	(858	)	$	(0.02	)	$	18,100		$	0.40		44,810	$	12,305		$	0.27	$	(182	)	$	-		$	12,123		$	0.27

	Three Months Ended September 30, 2015																		Three Months Ended June 30, 2016
			Income (Loss)					Income (Loss)													Income (Loss)					Income (Loss)
			From Continuing					From Discontinued						Net							From Continuing					From Discontinued					Net
			Operations					Operations						Income (Loss)							Operations					Operations					Income (Loss)
	Weighted					Per					Per						Per		Weighted					Per					Per					Per
	Average					Share					Share						Share		Average					Share					Share					Share
	Shares		Amount			Amount		Amount			Amount			Amount			Amount		Shares		Amount			Amount		Amount			Amount		Amount			Amount
	(In thousands, except per share amounts)																		(In thousands, except per share amounts)

Earnings (loss) and shares		50,456	$	27,103				$	(598	)				$	26,505					45,731	$	23,043				$	(221	)			$	22,822
Effect of participating securities:
Non-vested restricted stock				(13	)				-						(13	)						(13	)				-					(13	)
Basic earnings (loss) and shares		50,456	$	27,090		$	0.54	$	(598	)	$	(0.01	)	$	26,492		$	0.53		45,731	$	23,030		$	0.50	$	(221	)	$	-	$	22,809		$	0.50
Effect of dilutive securities:
Stock compensation plans		313																		193
Diluted earnings (loss) and shares		50,769	$	27,090		$	0.53	$	(598	)	$	(0.01	)	$	26,492		$	0.52		45,924	$	23,030		$	0.50	$	(221	)	$	-	$	22,809		$	0.50

	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016																		Six Months Ended June 30, 2017
			Income (Loss)					Income (Loss)													Income (Loss)					Income (Loss)
			From Continuing					From Discontinued						Net							From Continuing					From Discontinued						Net
			Operations					Operations						Income (Loss)							Operations					Operations						Income (Loss)
	Weighted					Per					Per						Per		Weighted					Per					Per						Per
	Average					Share					Share						Share		Average					Share					Share						Share
	Shares		Amount			Amount		Amount			Amount			Amount			Amount		Shares		Amount			Amount		Amount			Amount			Amount			Amount
	(In thousands, except per share amounts)																		(In thousands, except per share amounts)

Earnings (loss) and shares		45,930	$	56,475				$	(918	)				$	55,557					44,680	$	12,294				$	(703	)				$	11,591
Effect of participating securities:
Non-vested restricted stock				(31	)				-						(31	)						(9	)				-						(9	)
Basic earnings (loss) and shares		45,930	$	56,444		$	1.23	$	(918	)	$	(0.02	)	$	55,526		$	1.21		44,680	$	12,285		$	0.27	$	(703	)	$	(0.01	)	$	11,582		$	0.26
Effect of dilutive securities:
Stock compensation plans		200																		296
Diluted earnings (loss) and shares		46,130	$	56,444		$	1.22	$	(918	)	$	(0.02	)	$	55,526		$	1.20		44,976	$	12,285		$	0.27	$	(703	)	$	(0.01	)	$	11,582		$	0.26

	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015																		Six Months Ended June 30, 2016
			Income (Loss)					Income (Loss)													Income (Loss)					Income (Loss)
			From Continuing					From Discontinued						Net							From Continuing					From Discontinued						Net
			Operations					Operations						Income (Loss)							Operations					Operations						Income (Loss)
	Weighted					Per					Per						Per		Weighted					Per					Per						Per
	Average					Share					Share						Share		Average					Share					Share						Share
	Shares		Amount			Amount		Amount			Amount			Amount			Amount		Shares		Amount			Amount		Amount			Amount			Amount			Amount
	(In thousands, except per share amounts)																		(In thousands, except per share amounts)

Earnings (loss) and shares		50,697	$	56,584				$	(1,331	)				$	55,253					46,340	$	37,507				$	(61	)				$	37,446
Effect of participating securities:
Non-vested restricted stock				(27	)				-						(27	)						(21	)				-						(21	)
Basic earnings (loss) and shares		50,697	$	56,557		$	1.12	$	(1,331	)	$	(0.03	)	$	55,226		$	1.09		46,340	$	37,486		$	0.81	$	(61	)	$	-		$	37,425		$	0.81
Effect of dilutive securities:
Stock compensation plans		389																		183
Diluted earnings (loss) and shares		51,086	$	56,557		$	1.11	$	(1,331	)	$	(0.03	)	$	55,226		$	1.08		46,523	$	37,486		$	0.81	$	(61	)	$	(0.01	)	$	37,425		$	0.80

In addition to the stock options included in the tables above, options to purchase approximately 0.2 million ~~and 0.5 million~~ shares of Sonic’s Class A common stock were outstanding at ~~September~~June 30, 2016, ~~and 2015, respectively,~~ but were not included in the computation of diluted earnings (loss) per share because the options were not dilutive.

Sonic is involved, and expects to continue to be involved, in ~~numerous~~various legal and administrative proceedings arising out of the conduct of its business, including regulatory investigations and private civil actions brought by plaintiffs purporting to represent a potential class or for which a class has been certified. Although Sonic vigorously defends itself in all legal and administrative proceedings, the outcomes of pending and future proceedings arising out of the conduct of Sonic’s business, including litigation with customers, ~~employment related~~employment-related lawsuits, contractual disputes, class actions, purported class actions and actions brought by governmental authorities, cannot be predicted with certainty. An unfavorable resolution of one or more of these matters could have a material adverse effect on Sonic’s business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows or prospects.

~~At September 30, 2016, approximately $0.4 million and $0.2 million were included~~Included in other accrued liabilities and other long-term liabilities ~~respectively, and~~ at ~~and December 31, 2015,~~ June 30, 2017 was approximately ~~$0.3~~$2.5 million and $0.2 million, ~~were included in other accrued liabilities and other long-term liabilities,~~ respectively, in ~~the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets for~~ reserves that Sonic was holding for pending proceedings. Included in other accrued liabilities and other long-term liabilities at December 31, 2016 was approximately $0.3 million and $0.2 million, respectively, for such reserves. Except as reflected in such reserves, Sonic is currently unable to estimate a range of reasonably possible loss, or a range of reasonably possible loss in excess of the amount accrued, for pending proceedings.

In accordance with the terms of Sonic’s operating lease agreements, Sonic’s dealership subsidiaries, acting as lessees, generally agree to indemnify the lessor from certain exposure arising as a result of the use of the leased premises, including environmental exposure and repairs to leased property upon termination of the lease. In addition, Sonic has generally agreed to indemnify the lessor in the event of a breach of the lease by the lessee.

In connection with dealership dispositions and facility relocations, certain of Sonic’s ~~dealership~~ subsidiaries have assigned or sublet to the buyer ~~its~~their interests in real property leases associated with such dealerships. In general, the subsidiaries retain responsibility for the performance of certain obligations under such leases, including rent payments and repairs to leased property upon termination of the lease, to the extent that the assignee or ~~sub-lessee~~sublessee does not perform. In the event ~~the assignees or sub-lessees do~~a sublessee does not perform ~~their~~its obligations, ~~under such leases,~~ Sonic remains liable for the lease payments. See Note 12, “Commitments and Contingencies,” to the consolidated financial statements in Sonic’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016 for further discussion.

In accordance with the terms of agreements entered into for the sale of Sonic’s dealerships, Sonic generally agrees to indemnify the buyer from certain liabilities and costs arising subsequent to the date of sale, including environmental exposure and exposure resulting from the breach of representations or warranties made in accordance with the agreements. While Sonic’s exposure with respect to environmental remediation and repairs is difficult to quantify, Sonic’s maximum exposure associated with these general indemnifications was approximately ~~$3.5 million and $5.3~~$0.5 million at ~~September~~both June 30, ~~2016~~2017 and December 31, ~~2015, respectively.~~2016. These

indemnifications typically expire within a period of one to three years following the date of sale. The estimated fair value of these indemnifications was not material and the amount recorded for this contingency was not significant at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016.~~ 2017.

Sonic also guarantees the floor plan commitments of its 50%-owned joint venture, the amount of which was approximately $2.8 million at both ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017 and December 31, ~~2015.~~2016.

In determining fair value, Sonic uses various valuation approaches including market, income and/or cost approaches. “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” in the Accounting Standards Codification establishes a hierarchy for inputs used in measuring fair value that maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs by requiring that the most observable inputs be used when available. Observable inputs are inputs that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability developed based on market data obtained from sources independent of Sonic. Unobservable inputs are inputs that reflect Sonic’s assumptions about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability developed based on the best information available in the circumstances. The hierarchy is broken down into three levels based on the reliability of inputs as follows:

Level 1 – Valuations based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that Sonic has the ability to access. Assets utilizing Level 1 inputs include marketable securities that are actively traded, including Sonic’s stock or public bonds.

Level 2 – Valuations based on quoted prices in markets that are not active or for which all significant inputs are observable, either directly or indirectly. Assets and liabilities utilizing Level 2 inputs include cash flow swap instruments and deferred compensation plan balances.

Level 3 – Valuations based on inputs that are unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement. Asset and liability measurements utilizing Level 3 inputs include those used in estimating fair value of non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities in purchase acquisitions, those used in assessing impairment of property, plant and equipment and other intangibles and those used in the reporting unit valuation in the annual goodwill impairment evaluation.

The availability of observable inputs can vary and is affected by a wide variety of factors. To the extent that valuation is based on models or inputs that are less observable or unobservable in the market, the determination of fair value requires more judgment. Accordingly, the degree of judgment required by Sonic in determining fair value is greatest for assets and liabilities categorized in Level 3. In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, for disclosure purposes, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement is disclosed is determined based on the lowest level input (Level 3 being the lowest level) that is significant to the fair value measurement.

Fair value is a market-based measure considered from the perspective of a market participant who holds the asset or owes the liability rather than an entity-specific measure. Therefore, even when market assumptions are not readily available, Sonic’s own assumptions are set to reflect those that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability at the measurement date. Sonic uses inputs that are current as of the measurement date, including during periods when the market may be abnormally high or abnormally low. Accordingly, fair value measurements can be volatile based on various factors that may or may not be within Sonic’s control.

Assets and liabilities recorded at fair value in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets as of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017 and December 31, ~~2015~~2016 are as follows:

	Fair Value Based on Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)				Fair Value Based on Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)
	September 30, 2016		December 31, 2015		June 30, 2017		December 31, 2016
	(In thousands)				(In thousands)

Assets:
Cash surrender value of life insurance policies (1)	$	31,073	$	29,055	$	32,383	$	31,475
Cash flow swaps designated as hedges (2)						2,428		2,772
Total assets	$	31,073	$	29,055	$	34,811	$	34,247

Liabilities:
Cash flow swaps designated as hedges (2)	$	12,573	$	9,094
Cash flow swaps not designated as hedges (3)		507		913
Deferred compensation plan (4)		14,274		13,551
Cash flow swaps designated as hedges (3)					$	3,646	$	6,135
Cash flow swaps not designated as hedges (4)						68		346
Deferred compensation plan (5)						16,578		14,824
Total liabilities	$	27,354	$	23,558	$	20,292	$	21,305

~~There~~During the three months ended September 30, 2016, Sonic acquired three stand-alone pre-owned businesses and related real estate. As a result of continued operating losses at these locations, management decided to cease operations of two of these businesses during the three months ended June 30, 2017. As these businesses were never integrated into the reporting unit after acquisition, and thus the benefits of acquired goodwill were never realized by the rest of the reporting unit, Sonic determined that it was appropriate to impair approximately $0.9 million of goodwill related to the closure of these two businesses. In addition, Sonic impaired approximately $0.8 million of property and equipment related to the two closed businesses’ operating locations. Other than these items, there were no instances in the ~~three and nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017 which required a fair value measurement of assets ordinarily measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis. Therefore, the carrying value of assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets as of September 30, 2016 has not changed since December 31, 2015. These assets will be evaluated as of the annual valuation assessment date of October 1, ~~2016,~~2017 or as events or changes in circumstances require.

As of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017 and December 31, ~~2015,~~2016, the fair values of Sonic’s financial instruments, including receivables, notes receivable from finance contracts, notes payable – floor plan, trade accounts payable, borrowings under the ~~2014 Credit Facilities~~revolving credit facilities and certain mortgage notes, approximated their carrying values due either to length of maturity or existence of variable interest rates that approximate prevailing market rates.

At ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017 and December 31, ~~2015,~~2016, the fair value and carrying value of Sonic’s significant fixed rate long-term debt were as follows:

	September 30, 2016				December 31, 2015				June 30, 2017				December 31, 2016
	Fair Value		Carrying Value		Fair Value		Carrying Value		Fair Value		Carrying Value		Fair Value		Carrying Value
	(In thousands)								(In thousands)
7.0% Notes (1)	$	211,000	$	198,829	$	211,000	$	198,708	$	-	$	-	$	211,000	$	198,871
5.0% Notes (1)	$	284,934	$	289,273	$	284,250	$	300,000	$	276,256	$	289,273	$	284,934	$	289,273
6.125% Notes (1)									$	247,500	$	250,000	$	-	$	-
Mortgage Notes (2)	$	188,955	$	178,910	$	174,007	$	168,410	$	206,220	$	199,856	$	185,979	$	176,369
Other (2)	$	4,131	$	4,363	$	5,192	$	5,457	$	3,910	$	4,114	$	4,057	$	4,280

The changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) by component for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017 are as follows:

	Gains and Losses on Cash Flow Hedges			Defined Benefit Pension Plan		Total Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Gains and Losses on Cash Flow Hedges			Defined Benefit Pension Plan			Total Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
	(In thousands)								(In thousands)
Balance at December 31, 2015	$	(5,638	)	$	6	$	(5,632	)
Balance at December 31, 2016									$	(2,085	)	$	(177	)	$	(2,262	)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications (1)		(4,749	)		-		(4,749	)		(38	)		-			(38	)
Amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (2)		2,592			-		2,592			1,367			-			1,367
Net current-period other comprehensive income (loss)		(2,157	)		-		(2,157	)		1,329			-			1,329
Balance at September 30, 2016	$	(7,795	)	$	6	$	(7,789	)
Balance at June 30, 2017									$	(756	)	$	(177	)	$	(933	)

See the heading “Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” in Note 6, “Long-Term Debt,” for further discussion of Sonic’s cash flow hedges. For further discussion of Sonic’s defined benefit pension plan, see Note 10, “Employee Benefit Plans,” to the consolidated financial statements in Sonic’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2015.~~2016.

As of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, Sonic had two operating segments: Franchised Dealerships and ~~EchoPark~~^®.EchoPark. The Franchised Dealerships segment is comprised of retail automotive franchises that sell new vehicles and buy and sell used vehicles, sell replacement parts, perform vehicle repair and maintenance services, and arrange finance and insurance products. The EchoPark^® segment is comprised of stand-alone specialty retail locations that provide customers an opportunity to search, buy, service, finance and sell pre-owned vehicles.

The operating segments identified above are the business activities of Sonic for which discrete financial information is available and for which operating results are regularly reviewed by Sonic’s chief operating decision maker to assess operating performance and allocate resources. Sonic’s chief operating decision maker is a group of three individuals consisting of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and President, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, and Executive Vice President of Operations. The Company has determined that its operating segments also represent its reportable segments.

Reportable segment revenues and segment income (loss) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 are as follows:

	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,				Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2016		2015		2016		2015		2017		2016		2017		2016
	(In thousands)								(In thousands)
Revenues:
Franchised Dealerships	$	2,517,526	$	2,472,357	$	7,080,952	$	7,094,951	$	2,356,692	$	2,352,840	$	4,602,717	$	4,563,425
EchoPark^®		40,402		22,051		93,914		58,712
EchoPark										49,054		29,472		90,851		53,514
Total consolidated revenues	$	2,557,928	$	2,494,408	$	7,174,866	$	7,153,663	$	2,405,746	$	2,382,312	$	4,693,568	$	4,616,939

	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,						Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2016			2015			2016			2015			2017			2016			2017			2016
	(In thousands)												(In thousands)
Segment income (loss) (1):
Franchised Dealerships	$	47,852		$	61,104		$	140,705		$	145,888		$	40,544		$	53,561		$	74,013		$	92,854
EchoPark^®		(3,597	)		(3,545	)		(10,225	)		(13,827	)
EchoPark														(7,517	)		(3,206	)		(12,924	)		(6,630	)
Total segment income (loss)		44,255			57,559			130,480			132,061			33,027			50,355			61,089			86,224
Interest expense, other, net		(13,016	)		(12,361	)		(37,560	)		(38,635	)		(12,764	)		(12,205	)		(26,172	)		(24,544	)
Other income (expense), net		11			-			120			102			7			6			(14,495	)		110
Income (loss) from continuing operations before taxes	$	31,250		$	45,198		$	93,040		$	93,528		$	20,270		$	38,156		$	20,422		$	61,790

Subsequent to June 30, 2017, we incurred storm damage to vehicle inventory at a group of our stores in Ohio. Preliminary estimates of the loss not covered by insurance total approximately $1.0 million.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the Sonic Automotive, Inc. condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto ~~appearing~~included elsewhere in this report, as well as the ~~audited~~ consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto, “Item ~~1A:~~1A. Risk Factors” and “Item 7:7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” appearing in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2015.~~2016.

Except to the extent that differences among operating segments are material to an understanding of our business taken as a whole, we present the discussion in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations on a consolidated basis.

We are one of the largest automotive retailers in the United States (as measured by total revenue). As of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, we operated ~~114~~117 franchises in 13 states (representing 25 different brands of cars and light trucks) and 18 collision repair centers. For management and operational reporting purposes, we group certain franchises together that share management and inventory (principally used vehicles) into “stores.” As of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, we operated ~~111~~105 Franchised Dealership stores ~~including five~~and seven EchoPark^®stores.

As a result of the way we manage our business, ~~as of September 30, 2016,~~ we had two operating ~~segments:~~segments as of June 30, 2017: Franchised Dealerships and ~~EchoPark~~^®.EchoPark. Our franchised dealerships provide comprehensive services, including (1) sales of both new and used cars and light trucks; (2) sales of replacement parts and performance of vehicle maintenance, manufacturer warranty repairs, and paint and collision repair services (collectively, “Fixed Operations”); and (3) arrangement of extended warranties, service contracts, financing, insurance and other aftermarket products (collectively, “F&I”) for our customers. EchoPark^® provides the same services (excluding new vehicle sales and manufacturer warranty repairs) in unique stand-alone specialty retail locations. Our EchoPark^® business operates independently from our franchised new and used dealership sales ~~operations.~~operations and offers customers an exciting shopping and buying experience. Sales operations in our first EchoPark^® market in Denver, Colorado began in the fourth quarter of 2014. As of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, we had ~~five~~six EchoPark^® stores in operation in Colorado. During 2017 and 2018 we expect to ~~open another store in Colorado~~break ground on approximately 15 EchoPark locations in the ~~first half of 2017. During the second quarter of 2016, we announced that we have begun the process of expanding EchoPark~~^® ~~operations into additional markets in~~Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina and Texas ~~with operations in certain of these markets expected to begin in 2017.~~markets. We believe that our EchoPark^® business will provide long-term benefits to us, our stockholders and ~~customers.~~our guests. However, in the short term, this initiative may negatively impact our overall operating results as we allocate management and capital resources to this business.

Although vehicle sales and sales of associated finance, insurance and other aftermarket products are cyclical and are affected by many factors, including overall economic conditions, consumer confidence, levels of discretionary personal income, interest rates and available credit, our parts, service and collision repair services are not closely tied to vehicle sales and are not as dependent upon near-term sales volume. However, significant changes to the level of manufacturer recall and warranty activity could negatively impact our Fixed Operations results.

In the fourth quarter of 2013, we announced a new customer experience initiative known as “One Sonic-One ~~Experience.”~~Experience” (“OSOE”). This initiative includes several new processes and proprietary technologies from inventory management, electronic desking and pricing tools to a fully developed “customer-centric” Customer Relationship Management tool. We believe that the development of these processes and technologies will allow us to better serve our customers across our entire platform of stores. Our goal is to allow our guests to control the buying process and move at their pace so that once the vehicle has been selected our team can utilize these processes and technologies to allow our guests to complete a new or pre-owned vehicle sales transaction in less than an hour. During the latter half of 2014 and throughout 2015, we rolled out the ~~One Sonic-One Experience~~OSOE initiative at our dealerships in Charlotte, North Carolina. During ~~the first nine months of~~ 2016, we ~~rolled out~~introduced the ~~One Sonic-One Experience technologies~~technology component of the initiative to 14 additional stores in our Alabama, California and Tennessee markets, and, in the ~~Chattanooga, Tennessee; Birmingham, Alabama; and Los Angeles, California markets.~~first quarter of 2017, we launched OSOE at our BMW dealership in Greenville, South Carolina. Additional market implementations will continue upon completion of migration activities and required market/brand specific technology modifications. We believe that our ~~One Sonic-One Experience~~OSOE initiative will provide long-term benefits to us, our stockholders and ~~customers.~~our guests. However, in the short term, this initiative may negatively impact our overall operating results as we allocate management and capital resources to this initiative.

The U.S. retail automotive industry’s total new vehicle seasonally adjusted annual rate of sales (“SAAR”) decreased 2.9%, to 16.6 million vehicles in the three months ended June 30, 2017, from 17.1 million vehicles in the three months ended June 30, 2016, according to Bloomberg Financial Markets, via Stephens Inc. The SAAR decreased 1.2% to 16.9 million vehicles in the six months ended June 30, 2017, compared to 17.1 million vehicles in the six months ended June 30, 2016, according to Bloomberg Financial Markets, via Stephens Inc. For 2017, analysts’ average industry expectation for the new vehicle SAAR is approximately 17.0 million vehicles. We currently estimate the 2017 new vehicle SAAR will be between 16.5 million and 17.0 million vehicles. Changes in consumer confidence, availability of consumer financing, manufacturer inventory production levels or incentive levels from the automotive manufacturers could cause actual 2017 new vehicle SAAR to vary from expectations. Many factors such as brand and

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

~~The U.S. retail automotive industry’s total new vehicle seasonally adjusted annual rate of sales (“SAAR”) decreased 1.7%, to 17.5 million vehicles, in the three months ended September 30, 2016,~~ ~~from 17.8 million vehicles in the three months ended September 30, 2015~~, according to Bloomberg Financial Markets. The SAAR was flat at 17.2 million vehicles in the nine months ended September 30, 2016 compared to the prior year period, according to Bloomberg Financial Markets. For the year ending December 31, 2016, certain analysts’ average industry expectation for the total new vehicle SAAR is approximately 17.7 million vehicles. We estimate the 2016 total new vehicle SAAR will be between 17.3 million and 17.6 million vehicles. Changes in consumer confidence, availability of consumer financing or changes in the financial stability of the automotive manufacturers could cause the actual 2016 total new vehicle SAAR to vary from expectations. Many factors such as brand and geographic concentrations have caused our past results to differ from the industry’s overall trend, as well as the industry sales mix between retail and fleet new vehicle sales volume. Our current operational goal focuses on growing our retail new vehicle sales, as opposed to fleet new vehicle sales which is a minimal part of our business, and, as a result, we believe it is appropriate to compare our retail new vehicle unit sales volume to the retail SAAR (which excludes fleet new vehicle sales). According to PIN from J.D. Power, retail SAAR was ~~14.3~~13.5 million vehicles for the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016, down 2.7%~~2017, a decrease of 0.7% from the prior year period, and ~~13.8~~13.6 million vehicles for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016, down~~2017, an increase of 0.7% from the prior year ~~period.~~period.

Our significant exposure to the Houston market has created operational challenges in the past several quarters due to the downturn in the energy markets in that region. As a result, our Houston market has negatively impacted our overall new and used vehicle unit sales volume and gross profit across each of our business lines. While there are some signs that the energy market and Houston’s economy are beginning to rebound, we believe that the Houston market may continue to negatively impact our results until the market gains sustained, positive momentum and returns to previous operating levels.

Our same store retail new vehicle ~~unit sales volume~~revenue decreased 3.1% and ~~gross profit decreased~~2.3% during the three and ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, respectively, driven by a 3.4% and 2.7% decrease in retail new vehicle unit sales volume, respectively. Retail new vehicle gross profit decreased 5.3% and 3.2% during the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, respectively, driven primarily by lower retail new vehicle unit sales ~~volume and gross profit per unit in our Houston market as a result of continued challenges in the energy markets.~~ volume. Retail new vehicle gross profit per unit decreased ~~$43 per unit,~~$37, or ~~2.4%~~1.9%, to ~~$1,734 per unit~~$1,940 in the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, and decreased ~~$11 per unit,~~$10, or ~~0.6%~~0.5%, to ~~$1,877 per unit~~$1,947 in the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, 2016. We believe our retail new vehicle unit sales volume was lower than retail new vehicle industry sales volume due to a variety of factors, including our franchised dealer brand mix, our geographic market concentration and our internal inventory mix between cars and trucks/SUVs.2017. We believe that the recent trend of suppressed ~~industry~~ retail new vehicle gross margins is a result of downward pressure on pricing due to increased competition for sales between similar branded dealerships and higher overall inventory levels. We anticipate that this trend may continue to ~~negatively~~ impact new vehicle gross margins throughout ~~2016 and into~~ 2017.

Our used vehicle inventories were elevated during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 due to a significant number of vehicles held in inventory as a result of open safety recalls on certain models where the manufacturer instructed dealers not to sell the particular model until the recall work was performed. These “stop-sale” vehicles increased our inventory on-hand and associated floor plan interest expense and may continue to negatively affect our dealerships’ results of operations until warranty replacement parts become available. As of September 30, 2016, we had approximately 1,800 “stop-sale” used vehicles in our inventory, which increased our used vehicle days’ supply by approximately five days.

Our same store retail used vehicle ~~unit sales volume increased~~revenue decreased 0.6% during the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016, while our same store retail~~2017, driven by a 1.0% decrease in average selling price per unit as a result of a shift in brand and model sales mix. Retail used vehicle ~~gross profit decreased~~unit revenue increased 1.1% during the ~~three and nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016. We believe both~~2017, driven by a 0.4% increase in retail used vehicle unit sales volume and a 0.7% increase in average selling price per unit. Retail used vehicle gross profit ~~per unit declined~~increased 3.6% and 0.8% during the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, respectively, driven by an increase in ~~our Houston market as a result of continued challenges in the energy markets. Retail~~retail used vehicle gross profit per unit ~~decreased $79 per unit,~~of $39, or ~~5.7%~~3.2%, to ~~$1,310 per unit~~$1,266 in the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2017 and ~~decreased $77 per unit,~~increased $5, or ~~5.5%~~0.4%, to ~~$1,328 per unit~~$1,283 in the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, 2016. Our same store wholesale vehicle gross loss was flat during the three months ended September 30, 2016 in spite of a 33.7% increase in wholesale vehicle unit sales volume due to higher auction values.2017. Our same store wholesale vehicle gross loss increased ~~$0.2~~approximately $0.1 million, or 3.8%, during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016 and~~2017, driven primarily by a 5.1% increase in wholesale unit sales volume. Our same store wholesale vehicle gross loss increased approximately $0.1 million, or 2.7%, during the six months ended June 30, 2017, driven primarily by an increase in wholesale gross loss per unit ~~sales volume increased 11.4%. The Manheim used vehicle price index remains near multi-year highs, which results in higher costs~~ of ~~acquiring used vehicle inventory either by trade-in or at auction.~~2.3%. We focus on maintaining used vehicle inventory days’ supply in the 30- to ~~35-day~~40-day range in order to limit our exposure to market pricing volatility. Adjusted for “stop-sale” vehicles, our used vehicle inventory days’ supply was approximately 3739 days as of ~~September~~June 30, 2017, up one day compared to June 30, 2016.

Our same store Fixed Operations ~~gross profit~~revenue increased 1.5% and 1.2% during the three and ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, respectively, driving a 1.8% and 1.4% increase in ~~spite of lower~~ Fixed Operations gross ~~margin as a result~~profit, respectively. Our Fixed Operations gross profit increase was driven primarily by our Lexus, Honda and Audi dealerships. Although vehicle sales and sales of ~~increased~~associated finance, insurance and other aftermarket products are cyclical and are affected by many factors, including overall economic conditions, consumer confidence, levels of ~~sublet work~~discretionary personal income, interest rates and ~~a shift~~available credit, our parts, service and collision repair services are not as closely tied to vehicle sales and are not as dependent upon near-term sales volume. However, significant changes to the level of manufacturer recall and warranty activity could negatively impact our Fixed Operations results in ~~warranty brand mix to lower-margin brands. During~~ the ~~nine~~future.

Our same store F&I revenue increased 0.7% and 0.4% during the three and six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016, customer pay~~2017, respectively, driven by a 2.4% and 1.6% increase in F&I gross profit per retail unit, respectively. F&I gross profit per retail unit increased ~~notwithstanding slowing customer pay growth~~$32 to $1,374 in the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016. During~~2017 and increased $22 to $1,372 in the ~~three and nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, 2016, warranty gross profit growth slowed due primarily to lower levels of warranty and recall activity at our BMW and Lexus dealerships and a shift in the type of warranty work toward less labor intensive, lower-margin warranty and recall claims. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, total internal, sublet and other gross profit increased on higher used vehicle reconditioning volume.

~~MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS~~

Our same store F&I gross profit increased during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016. F&I gross profit per unit increased $65 per unit, or 5.1%, to $1,341 per unit during the three months ended September 30, 2016, and increased $80 per unit, or 6.3%, to $1,347 per unit during the nine months ended September 30, 2016. These per unit increases offset the effect of overall lower retail unit sales volume.2017. We believe that our proprietary software applications, ~~and~~ playbook processes ~~drove~~and customer-centric selling approach continued to drive increases in gross profit per F&I ~~contract and penetration rates (the number of F&I products sold per vehicle).~~contract. We believe we will continue to improve in this area as we refine our processes, train our associates and continue to sell high levels of retail new and used vehicles at our franchised dealerships and EchoPark stores.

~~We repurchased~~Impairment charges increased approximately ~~0.6~~$2.4 million ~~shares~~and $3.0 million during the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, respectively. Impairment charges for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 include the write-off of goodwill and property and equipment related to the closure of two stand-alone pre-owned stores that were purchased in 2016, in addition to the write-off of capitalized costs associated with abandonment of certain construction projects. Impairment charges for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 include the write-off of capitalized costs associated with abandonment of certain construction projects. Depreciation and amortization expense increased approximately $3.0 million and $5.7 million during the three and six months ended

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

June 30, 2017, respectively, due primarily to completed construction projects and purchases of fixed assets for use in our ~~Class A common stock~~franchised dealerships and EchoPark stores. Interest expense, floor plan increased approximately $2.5 million and $4.4 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, respectively, due primarily to higher effective interest rates on floor plan notes payable. Interest expense, other, net during the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 includes the effects of higher stated/coupon interest related to approximately ~~$10.0~~$0.7 million of double-carry interest for the period during which the 7.0% Notes and the 6.125% Notes were both outstanding. For the six months ended June 30, 2017, other income (expense), net includes a charge of approximately $14.6 million related to the extinguishment of the 7.0% Notes.

Income from continuing operations before taxes for the three months ended June 30, 2017 decreased approximately $17.9 million and was impacted by certain unusual pre-tax charges, including approximately $4.6 million of expense due to storm-related physical damage, approximately $1.0 million related to legal accruals, approximately $1.0 million of lease exit charges and approximately $2.6 million of impairment charges. There were no similar one-time items during the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, 2016. Income from continuing operations before taxes for the six months ended June 30, 2017 decreased approximately $41.4 million and was impacted by certain pre-tax charges, including approximately $7.0 million of expense due to storm-related physical damage, approximately $1.0 million of lease exit charges and approximately $3.1 million of impairment charges, offset partially by a net benefit of approximately $0.1 million related to legal settlements. Income from continuing operations before taxes for the six months ended June 30, 2016 ~~and~~was impacted by certain pre-tax charges which include approximately ~~5.4~~$6.0 million ~~shares~~ of our Class A common stock for approximately $97.5 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2016. These share repurchases reduced our total outstanding share count by approximately 10.2% as of September 30, 2016, comparedexpense due to ~~December 31, 2015.~~

On September 30, 2016, we repurchased in a private transaction $10,727,000 in aggregate principal amount of our 5.0% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2023 (the “5.0% Notes”) at a repurchase price of 98.75% of par.storm-related physical damage.

The following ~~is a detail~~table depicts the breakdown of our new vehicle revenues from continuing operations by brand for the three and ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015:~~2016:

	Percentage of New Vehicle Revenue						Percentage of New Vehicle Revenue						Percentage of New Vehicle Revenue						Percentage of New Vehicle Revenue
	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,						Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
Brand	2016			2015			2016			2015			2017			2016			2017			2016
Luxury:
BMW		19.7	%		20.3	%		20.1	%		21.1	%		18.7	%		20.0	%		19.1	%		20.3	%
Mercedes		10.7	%		9.1	%		10.2	%		9.4	%		10.5	%		9.9	%		10.6	%		10.0	%
Lexus		5.8	%		5.5	%		5.7	%		5.4	%		5.9	%		5.5	%		5.7	%		5.7	%
Audi		5.1	%		4.9	%		5.1	%		4.9	%		5.7	%		5.5	%		5.3	%		5.1	%
Land Rover		3.0	%		3.1	%		3.4	%		3.8	%		3.2	%		3.3	%		3.5	%		3.7	%
Cadillac		3.4	%		3.3	%		3.3	%		3.2	%		2.8	%		3.3	%		2.8	%		3.3	%
Porsche		2.3	%		2.6	%		2.3	%		2.5	%		2.8	%		2.7	%		2.5	%		2.3	%
MINI		1.5	%		1.7	%		1.7	%		2.0	%		1.6	%		1.8	%		1.5	%		1.8	%
Other luxury (1)		3.2	%		3.6	%		3.1	%		3.3	%		2.6	%		2.8	%		2.7	%		2.8	%
Total Luxury		54.7	%		54.1	%		54.9	%		55.6	%		53.8	%		54.8	%		53.7	%		55.0	%
Mid-line Import:
Honda		17.5	%		16.5	%		17.5	%		15.9	%		18.4	%		17.7	%		18.6	%		17.5	%
Toyota		11.7	%		11.5	%		11.5	%		11.2	%		13.1	%		11.2	%		12.6	%		11.4	%
Volkswagen		1.6	%		1.8	%		1.5	%		1.8	%		1.7	%		1.5	%		1.7	%		1.5	%
Hyundai		1.3	%		1.6	%		1.3	%		1.5	%		1.7	%		1.3	%		1.6	%		1.2	%
Other imports (2)		1.5	%		1.4	%		1.5	%		1.5	%		1.3	%		1.7	%		1.3	%		1.6	%
Total Mid-line Import		33.6	%		32.8	%		33.3	%		31.9	%		36.2	%		33.4	%		35.8	%		33.2	%
Domestic:
Ford		6.5	%		7.3	%		6.5	%		7.0	%		6.0	%		6.4	%		6.2	%		6.4	%
General Motors (3)		5.2	%		5.8	%		5.3	%		5.5	%		4.0	%		5.4	%		4.3	%		5.4	%
Total Domestic		11.7	%		13.1	%		11.8	%		12.5	%		10.0	%		11.8	%		10.5	%		11.8	%

Total		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Unless otherwise noted, all discussion of increases or decreases for the three and ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017 are compared to the ~~three and nine months ended September 30, 2015,~~same prior year period, as applicable. The following discussion of new vehicles, used vehicles, wholesale vehicles, parts, service and collision repair, and finance, insurance and other, net are on a same store basis, except where otherwise noted. All currently operating continuing operations stores (both our franchised dealerships and EchoPark^®) stores) are included within the same store group in the first full month following the first anniversary of the store’s opening or acquisition. During the three months ended September 30, 2016, we acquired three stand-alone used vehicle stores and began operations at a manufacturer-awarded franchise open point, the results of which are excluded from the same store group. We opened two additional EchoPark^® ~~stores during the nine months ended September 30, 2016, the results of which are excluded from the same store group.~~

The automobile retail industry uses the total new vehicle SAAR to measure the annual amount of expected new vehicle unit sales activity (both retail and fleet sales) within the United States. The total and retail SAAR below reflect all brands marketed or sold in the United States. The total and retail SAAR include brands we do not sell and markets in which we do not ~~operate,~~operate; therefore, our new vehicle sales may not trend directly in line with the total and retail SAAR. We believe that retail SAAR is a more meaningful metric for comparing our new ~~vehicles~~vehicle sales volume to the industry due to our minimal fleet vehicle business.

	Three Months Ended September 30,							Nine Months Ended September 30,							Three Months Ended June 30,							Six Months Ended June 30,
(In millions of vehicles)	2016		2015		% Change			2016		2015		% Change			2017		2016		% Change			2017		2016		% Change
Retail SAAR (1)		14.3		14.7		(2.7	%)		13.8		13.9		(0.7	%)		13.5		13.6		(0.7	%)		13.6		13.5		0.7	%
Fleet SAAR		3.2		3.1		3.2	%		3.4		3.3		3.0	%		3.1		3.5		(11.4	%)		3.3		3.6		(8.3	%)
Total SAAR (2)		17.5		17.8		(1.7	%)		17.2		17.2		0.0	%		16.6		17.1		(2.9	%)		16.9		17.1		(1.2	%)

The following tables provide a reconciliation of same store basis and reported basis for total new vehicles (retail and fleet sales):

~~MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS~~

Nine Months Ended
September 30,

Better / (Worse)

2016

2015

Change

% Change

(In thousands, except units and per unit data)

Reported new vehicle:

Revenue

$
3,826,178

$
3,865,639

$
(39,461
)

(1.0
%)
Gross profit

$
186,678

$
193,720

$
(7,042
)

(3.6
%)
Unit sales

100,441

104,145

(3,704
)

(3.6
%)
Revenue per unit

$
38,094

$
37,118

$
976

2.6
%
Gross profit per unit

$
1,859

$
1,860

$
(1
)

(0.1
%)
Gross profit as a % of revenue

4.9
%

5.0
%

(10
)

bps

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Better / (Worse)
	2017		2016		Change			% Change
	(In thousands, except unit data)
Total new vehicle revenue:
Same store	$	1,258,531	$	1,286,464	$	(27,933	)		(2.2	%)
Acquisitions and dispositions		16,538		-		16,538		NM
Total as reported	$	1,275,069	$	1,286,464	$	(11,395	)		(0.9	%)

Total new vehicle gross profit:
Same store	$	61,477	$	65,842	$	(4,365	)		(6.6	%)
Acquisitions and dispositions		1,045		24		1,021		NM
Total as reported	$	62,522	$	65,866	$	(3,344	)		(5.1	%)

Total new vehicle units:
Same store		32,767		33,782		(1,015	)		(3.0	%)
Acquisitions and dispositions		381		-		381		NM
Total as reported		33,148		33,782		(634	)		(1.9	%)

NM = Not Meaningful

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Our ~~same store~~reported new vehicle results (including fleet) are as follows:

	Three Months Ended September 30,						Better / (Worse)						Three Months Ended June 30,						Better / (Worse)
	2016			2015			Change			% Change			2017			2016			Change			% Change
	(In thousands, except units and per unit data)												(In thousands, except units and per unit data)
Same store new vehicle:
Reported new vehicle:
Revenue	$	1,369,958		$	1,354,798		$	15,160			1.1	%	$	1,275,069		$	1,286,464		$	(11,395	)		(0.9	%)
Gross profit	$	61,794		$	64,853		$	(3,059	)		(4.7	%)	$	62,522		$	65,866		$	(3,344	)		(5.1	%)
Unit sales		35,957			37,164			(1,207	)		(3.2	%)		33,148			33,782			(634	)		(1.9	%)
Revenue per unit	$	38,100		$	36,455		$	1,645			4.5	%	$	38,466		$	38,081		$	385			1.0	%
Gross profit per unit	$	1,719		$	1,745		$	(26	)		(1.5	%)	$	1,886		$	1,950		$	(64	)		(3.3	%)
Gross profit as a % of revenue		4.5	%		4.8	%		(30	)	bps				4.9	%		5.1	%		(20	)	bps

	Nine Months Ended September 30,						Better / (Worse)						Six Months Ended June 30,						Better / (Worse)
	2016			2015			Change			% Change			2017			2016			Change			% Change
	(In thousands, except units and per unit data)												(In thousands, except units and per unit data)
Same store new vehicle:
Reported new vehicle:
Revenue	$	3,820,992		$	3,827,094		$	(6,102	)		(0.2	%)	$	2,447,001		$	2,451,034		$	(4,033	)		(0.2	%)
Gross profit	$	186,011		$	192,204		$	(6,193	)		(3.2	%)	$	120,800		$	124,290		$	(3,490	)		(2.8	%)
Unit sales		100,344			103,175			(2,831	)		(2.7	%)		63,643			64,387			(744	)		(1.2	%)
Revenue per unit	$	38,079		$	37,093		$	986			2.7	%	$	38,449		$	38,067		$	382			1.0	%
Gross profit per unit	$	1,854		$	1,863		$	(9	)		(0.5	%)	$	1,898		$	1,930		$	(32	)		(1.7	%)
Gross profit as a % of revenue		4.9	%		5.0	%		(10	)	bps				4.9	%		5.1	%		(20	)	bps

During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, we believe our retail new vehicle unit sales volume was negatively affected by “stop-sale” vehicles held in inventory as a result of open safety recalls on certain models where the manufacturer instructed dealers not to sell the particular model until the recall work was performed. These “stop-sale” vehicles increased our inventory on-hand and associated floor plan interest expense and may continue to affect our dealerships’ results of operations until warranty replacement parts become available.

~~Three Months Ended September 30, 2016 Compared to Three Months Ended September 30, 2015~~

Excluding fleet sales, our retail new vehicle revenue increased 1.5% and our retail new vehicle unit sales volume decreased 2.6%. Decreases in retail new vehicle unit sales volume at our Ford, Toyota, General Motors (excluding Cadillac), BMW and Hyundai dealerships were the main drivers of our retail new vehicle unit sales volume decline, offset partially by increases in retail new vehicle unit sales volume at our Mercedes, Jaguar and Honda dealerships. Excluding fleet sales, our retail new vehicle gross profit decreased approximately $3.2 million, or 5.0%, primarily driven by decreases in retail new vehicle gross profit at our BMW, Ford, General Motors (excluding Cadillac), Porsche and Land Rover dealerships, offset partially by increases in retail new vehicle gross profit at our Jaguar, Honda and Mercedes dealerships. Our gross profit per retail new unit decreased $43 per unit, or 2.4%, primarily driven by decreases in gross profit per retail new unit at our BMW, Ford and General Motors (excluding Cadillac) dealerships, offset partially by increases in gross profit per retail new unit at our Jaguar, Honda and Mercedes dealerships.

We believe the decline in retail new vehicle gross profit per unit is primarily due to downward pricing pressure in the Houston market as a result of a downturn in the energy sector and its effect on the local economy.

~~Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015~~

Excluding fleet sales, our retail new vehicle revenue decreased 0.3% and our retail new vehicle unit sales volume decreased 2.9%. Decreases in retail new vehicle unit sales volume at our BMW, Toyota, Ford and MINI dealerships were the main drivers of our retail new vehicle unit sales volume decline, offset partially by increases in retail new vehicle unit sales volume at our Honda, Volvo, Jaguar and Mercedes dealerships. Excluding fleet sales, our retail new vehicle gross profit decreased approximately $6.6 million, or 3.4%, primarily driven by decreases in retail new vehicle gross profit at our Land Rover, Ford, General Motors (excluding Cadillac), Porsche and BMW dealerships, offset partially by increases in retail new vehicle gross profit at our Honda and Volvo dealerships. ~~Our~~

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Excluding fleet sales, our retail new vehicle revenue decreased 3.1% and our retail new vehicle unit sales volume decreased 3.4%, driven primarily by decreases in retail new vehicle unit sales volume at our General Motors (excluding Cadillac), BMW and Ford dealerships, offset partially by an increase in retail new vehicle unit sales volume at our Toyota dealerships. Excluding fleet sales, our retail new vehicle gross profit decreased approximately $3.5 million, or 5.3%, primarily driven by decreases in retail new vehicle gross profit at our General Motors (excluding Cadillac), Cadillac and Lexus dealerships. Our gross profit per retail new vehicle unit decreased ~~$11 per unit,~~$37, or ~~0.6%~~1.9%, primarily driven by decreases in gross profit per retail new vehicle unit at our ~~Land Rover, Ford and~~ General Motors (excluding Cadillac), Cadillac and Lexus dealerships, offset partially by increases in gross profit per retail new vehicle unit at our Honda, BMW and ~~Volvo~~Mercedes dealerships. Our Houston market continued to weigh on our retail new vehicle results, experiencing a 14.5% decrease in retail new vehicle unit sales volume and contributing to the overall decrease in gross profit per retail new vehicle unit by $51.

~~We believe the decline~~Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2016

Excluding fleet sales, our retail new vehicle revenue decreased 2.3% and our retail new vehicle unit sales volume decreased 2.7%, driven primarily by decreases in retail new vehicle unit sales volume at our General Motors (excluding Cadillac), BMW and Ford dealerships, offset partially by an increase in retail new vehicle unit sales volume at our Toyota and Honda dealerships. Excluding fleet sales, our retail new vehicle gross profit decreased approximately $4.0 million, or 3.2%, primarily driven by decreases in retail new vehicle gross profit at our General Motors (excluding Cadillac), Lexus and Cadillac dealerships, offset partially by increases in retail new vehicle gross profit at our BMW, Honda and Ford dealerships. Our gross profit per retail new vehicle unit isdecreased $10, or 0.5%, primarily ~~due to downward pricing pressure~~driven by decreases in ~~the~~gross profit per retail new vehicle unit at our General Motors (excluding Cadillac), Lexus and Cadillac dealerships, offset partially by increases in gross profit per retail new vehicle unit at our BMW, Honda and Ford dealerships. Our Houston market ~~as a result of a downturn~~continued to weigh on our retail new vehicle results, experiencing an 11.5% decrease in retail new vehicle unit sales volume and contributing to the ~~energy sector and its effect on the local economy.~~overall decrease in gross profit per retail new vehicle unit by $35.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Used vehicle revenues are directly affected by a number of factors, including the level of manufacturer incentives on new vehicles, the number and quality of trade-ins and lease turn-ins, the availability and pricing of used vehicles acquired at auction and the availability of consumer credit.

The following tables provide a reconciliation of same store basis and reported basis for retail used vehicles:

	Three Months Ended September 30,					Better / (Worse)						Three Months Ended June 30,				Better / (Worse)
	2016			2015		Change			% Change			2017		2016		Change			% Change
	(In thousands, except unit data)											(In thousands, except unit data)
Total used vehicle revenue:
Same store	$	649,308		$	644,255	$	5,053			0.8	%	$	618,082	$	621,748	$	(3,666	)		(0.6	%)
Acquisitions and dispositions		11,666			7,803		3,863			49.5	%		23,809		438		23,371		NM
Total as reported	$	660,974		$	652,058	$	8,916			1.4	%	$	641,891	$	622,186	$	19,705			3.2	%

Total used vehicle gross profit:
Same store	$	39,862		$	41,726	$	(1,864	)		(4.5	%)	$	37,209	$	35,919	$	1,290			3.6	%
Acquisitions and dispositions		(240	)		4		(244	)		(6100.0	%)		2,826		1,050		1,776		NM
Total as reported	$	39,622		$	41,730	$	(2,108	)		(5.1	%)	$	40,035	$	36,969	$	3,066			8.3	%

Total used vehicle units:
Same store		30,433			30,053		380			1.3	%		29,388		29,267		121			0.4	%
Acquisitions and dispositions		500			414		86			20.8	%		1,148		20		1,128		NM
Total as reported		30,933			30,467		466			1.5	%		30,536		29,287		1,249			4.3	%

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Nine Months Ended September 30,

Better / (Worse)

2016

2015

Change

% Change

(In thousands, except unit data)

Total used vehicle revenue:

Same store

$
1,869,411

$
1,878,064

$
(8,653
)

(0.5
%)
Acquisitions and dispositions

12,103

26,530

(14,427
)

(54.4
%)
Total as reported

$
1,881,514

$
1,904,594

$
(23,080
)

(1.2
%)

Total used vehicle gross profit:

Same store

$
118,250

$
123,062

$
(4,812
)

(3.9
%)
Acquisitions and dispositions

(1,129
)

209

(1,338
)

(640.2
%)
Total as reported

$
117,121

$
123,271

$
(6,150
)

(5.0
%)

Total used vehicle units:

Same store

89,033

87,549

1,484

1.7
%
Acquisitions and dispositions

520

1,354

(834
)

(61.6
%)
Total as reported

89,553

88,903

650

0.7
%

	Six Months Ended June 30,						Better / (Worse)
	2017			2016			Change		% Change
	(In thousands, except units and per unit data)
Reported used vehicle:
Revenue	$	1,276,364		$	1,220,540		$	55,824		4.6	%
Gross profit	$	80,867		$	77,499		$	3,368		4.3	%
Unit sales		60,908			58,620			2,288		3.9	%
Revenue per unit	$	20,956		$	20,821		$	135		0.6	%
Gross profit per unit	$	1,328		$	1,322		$	6		0.5	%
Gross profit as a % of revenue		6.3	%		6.3	%		0	bps

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

	Three Months Ended September 30,						Better / (Worse)						Three Months Ended June 30,						Better / (Worse)
	2016			2015			Change			% Change			2017			2016			Change			% Change
	(In thousands, except units and per unit data)												(In thousands, except units and per unit data)
Reported used vehicle:
Same store used vehicle:
Revenue	$	660,974		$	652,058		$	8,916			1.4	%	$	618,082		$	621,748		$	(3,666	)		(0.6	%)
Gross profit	$	39,622		$	41,730		$	(2,108	)		(5.1	%)	$	37,209		$	35,919		$	1,290			3.6	%
Unit sales		30,933			30,467			466			1.5	%		29,388			29,267			121			0.4	%
Revenue per unit	$	21,368		$	21,402		$	(34	)		(0.2	%)	$	21,032		$	21,244		$	(212	)		(1.0	%)
Gross profit per unit	$	1,281		$	1,370		$	(89	)		(6.5	%)	$	1,266		$	1,227		$	39			3.2	%
Gross profit as a % of revenue		6.0	%		6.4	%		(40	)	bps				6.0	%		5.8	%		20		bps

	Nine Months Ended September 30,						Better / (Worse)						Six Months Ended June 30,						Better / (Worse)
	2016			2015			Change			% Change			2017			2016			Change		% Change
	(In thousands, except units and per unit data)												(In thousands, except units and per unit data)
Reported used vehicle:
Same store used vehicle:
Revenue	$	1,881,514		$	1,904,594		$	(23,080	)		(1.2	%)	$	1,233,473		$	1,220,103		$	13,370		1.1	%
Gross profit	$	117,121		$	123,271		$	(6,150	)		(5.0	%)	$	75,495		$	74,910		$	585		0.8	%
Unit sales		89,553			88,903			650			0.7	%		58,846			58,600			246		0.4	%
Revenue per unit	$	21,010		$	21,423		$	(413	)		(1.9	%)	$	20,961		$	20,821		$	140		0.7	%
Gross profit per unit	$	1,308		$	1,387		$	(79	)		(5.7	%)	$	1,283		$	1,278		$	5		0.4	%
Gross profit as a % of revenue		6.2	%		6.5	%		(30	)	bps				6.1	%		6.1	%		0	bps

~~MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS~~

During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, manufacturer “stop-sale” instructions for safety recalls on certain models increased our inventory on-hand by approximately 1,600 vehicles at March 31, 2016 , approximately 4,200 vehicles at June 30, 2016, and approximately 1,800 vehicles at September 30, 2016 primarily in certain BMW and Honda models. We believe the “stop-sale” inventory negatively affected both our retail unit sales volume and gross profit per unit during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 due to the inability to retail these units, which typically are in higher demand and can yield higher gross profit per unit. The increased inventory and associated floor plan interest expense may also affect our dealerships’ results of operations until warranty replacement parts become available.

In addition to the factors discussed below, incremental used vehicle unit sales volume in the three and ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017 contributed to additional Fixed Operations gross profit (via reconditioning) and F&I gross profit as discussed under the headings “Parts, Service and Collision Repair (“Fixed Operations”)” and “Finance, Insurance and Other, Net (“F&I”)” below.

Three Months Ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017 Compared to Three Months Ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2015~~2016

~~Retail used~~Used vehicle revenue ~~increased 0.8%~~decreased 0.6%, ~~driven primarily by~~as a ~~1.3%~~result of a shift in brand and model sales mix, in spite of a 0.4% increase in ~~retail~~ used vehicle unit sales volume. This increase in ~~retail~~ used vehicle unit sales volume was primarily driven by increases in ~~retail~~ used vehicle unit sales volume at our BMW and ~~Mercedes~~MINI dealerships and EchoPark^® stores, offset partially by decreases in ~~retail~~ used vehicle unit sales volume at our ~~Honda,~~ Ford and ~~Volkswagen~~General Motors (excluding Cadillac) dealerships. ~~Retail used~~Used vehicle gross profit ~~decreased~~increased approximately ~~$1.9~~$1.3 million, or ~~4.5%~~3.6%, driven primarily by ~~lower retail~~higher used vehicle unit sales volume and ~~retail~~ used vehicle gross profit per unit at our ~~dealerships in~~Lexus, Honda and BMW dealerships. Used vehicle gross profit per unit increased $39, or 3.2%, with the Houston ~~market. Retail~~market improving from the first quarter of 2017, contributing a $12 increase in used vehicle gross profit per unit.

Used vehicle revenue increased 1.1%, driven by a 0.4% increase in used vehicle unit ~~decreased $78~~sales volume and a 0.7% increase in average selling price per unit or 5.6%, driven primarily by lower retail used vehicle gross profit per unit at our Honda dealerships and our General Motors (excluding Cadillac) and Volkswagen dealerships in the Houston market, offset partially by higher retail used vehicle gross profit per unit at our BMW dealerships. We believe that the decrease in overall retail used vehicle gross profit per unit is due in part to the positive effects of newly redesigned models in certain brands on new vehicle demand, which, in turn, put downward pricing pressure on similar pre-owned models in those brands. In addition, our Volkswagen dealerships experienced significant decreases in retail used vehicle gross profit per unit both due to the brand reputational damage as a result of ~~the ongoing emissions scandal~~a shift in brand and ~~their exposure to the Houston energy market.~~

~~Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015~~

~~Retail used vehicle revenue decreased 0.5%, notwithstanding a 1.7%~~model sales mix. The increase in ~~retail used vehicle unit sales volume. This increase in retail~~ used vehicle unit sales volume was primarily driven by increases in ~~retail~~ used vehicle unit sales volume at our BMW ~~Toyota~~ and ~~Mercedes~~MINI dealerships and EchoPark^® stores, offset partially by decreases in ~~retail~~ used vehicle unit sales volume at our ~~Honda,~~Ford and General Motors (excluding Cadillac) ~~and Volkswagen~~ dealerships. ~~Retail used~~Used vehicle gross profit ~~decreased~~increased approximately ~~$4.8~~$0.6 million, or ~~3.9%~~0.8%, driven primarily by ~~lower retail~~increases in used vehicle unit sales volume ~~and retail~~in the California market. Used vehicle gross profit per unit increased $5, or 0.4%, driven primarily by higher used vehicle gross profit per unit at our ~~Honda~~Audi and Toyota dealerships and our General Motors (excluding Cadillac) and Ford dealerships in the Houston market. Retail used vehicle gross profit per unit decreased $78 per unit, or 5.5%, driven primarily by lower retail used vehicle gross profit per unit at our Honda, General Motors (excluding Cadillac) and ToyotaLexus dealerships. We believe that the decrease in overall retail used vehicle gross profit per unit is due in part to the positive effects of newly redesigned models in certain brands on new vehicle demand, which, in turn, put downward pricing pressure on similar pre-owned models in those brands. In addition, our Houston dealerships experienced significant decreases in retail used vehicle gross profit per unit due to downward pricing pressure in the Houston market as a result of a downturn in the energy sector and its effect on the local economy.

Wholesale vehicle revenues are highly correlated with retail new and used vehicle sales and the associated trade-in volume. Wholesale vehicle revenues are also significantly affected by our corporate inventory management policies, which are designed to optimize our total used vehicle inventory.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following tables provide a reconciliation of same store basis and reported basis for wholesale vehicles:

	Three Months Ended September 30,						Better / (Worse)						Three Months Ended June 30,						Better / (Worse)
	2016			2015			Change			% Change			2017			2016			Change			% Change
	(In thousands, except unit data)												(In thousands, except unit data)
Total wholesale vehicle revenue:
Same store	$	70,029		$	37,599		$	32,430			86.3	%	$	39,524		$	38,246		$	1,278			3.3	%
Acquisitions and dispositions		493			372			121			32.5	%		1,241			(1	)		1,242		NM
Total as reported	$	70,522		$	37,971		$	32,551			85.7	%	$	40,765		$	38,245		$	2,520			6.6	%

Total wholesale vehicle gross profit (loss):
Same store	$	(2,385	)	$	(2,420	)	$	35			1.4	%	$	(1,909	)	$	(1,840	)	$	(69	)		(3.8	%)
Acquisitions and dispositions		(122	)		(61	)		(61	)		(100.0	%)		(8	)		1			(9	)	NM
Total as reported	$	(2,507	)	$	(2,481	)	$	(26	)		(1.0	%)	$	(1,917	)	$	(1,839	)	$	(78	)		(4.2	%)

Total wholesale vehicle units:
Same store		10,323			7,722			2,601			33.7	%		7,577			7,212			365			5.1	%
Acquisitions and dispositions		54			65			(11	)		(16.9	%)		206			-			206		NM
Total as reported		10,377			7,787			2,590			33.3	%		7,783			7,212			571			7.9	%

	Nine Months Ended September 30,						Better / (Worse)						Six Months Ended June 30,						Better / (Worse)
	2016			2015			Change			% Change			2017			2016			Change			% Change
	(In thousands, except unit data)												(In thousands, except unit data)
Total wholesale vehicle revenue:
Same store	$	152,627		$	119,269		$	33,358			28.0	%	$	84,784		$	82,599		$	2,185			2.6	%
Acquisitions and dispositions		514			1,491			(977	)		(65.5	%)		2,292			21			2,271		NM
Total as reported	$	153,141		$	120,760		$	32,381			26.8	%	$	87,076		$	82,620		$	4,456			5.4	%

Total wholesale vehicle gross profit (loss):
Same store	$	(5,300	)	$	(5,072	)	$	(228	)		(4.5	%)	$	(2,994	)	$	(2,915	)	$	(79	)		(2.7	%)
Acquisitions and dispositions		(125	)		(294	)		169			57.5	%		(93	)		(2	)		(91	)	NM
Total as reported	$	(5,425	)	$	(5,366	)	$	(59	)		(1.1	%)	$	(3,087	)	$	(2,917	)	$	(170	)		(5.8	%)

Total wholesale vehicle units:
Same store		25,953			23,300			2,653			11.4	%		15,697			15,630			67			0.4	%
Acquisitions and dispositions		59			274			(215	)		(78.5	%)		393			5			388		NM
Total as reported		26,012			23,574			2,438			10.3	%		16,090			15,635			455			2.9	%

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

	Nine Months Ended September 30,						Better / (Worse)							Six Months Ended June 30,						Better / (Worse)
	2016			2015			Change			% Change				2017			2016			Change			% Change
	(In thousands, except units and per unit data)													(In thousands, except units and per unit data)
Reported wholesale vehicle:													Reported wholesale vehicle:
Revenue	$	153,141		$	120,760		$	32,381			26.8	%	Revenue	$	87,076		$	82,620		$	4,456			5.4	%
Gross profit (loss)	$	(5,425	)	$	(5,366	)	$	(59	)		(1.1	%)	Gross profit (loss)	$	(3,087	)	$	(2,917	)	$	(170	)		(5.8	%)
Unit sales		26,012			23,574			2,438			10.3	%	Unit sales		16,090			15,635			455			2.9	%
Revenue per unit	$	5,887		$	5,123		$	764			14.9	%	Revenue per unit	$	5,412		$	5,284		$	128			2.4	%
Gross profit (loss) per unit	$	(209	)	$	(228	)	$	19			8.3	%	Gross profit (loss) per unit	$	(192	)	$	(187	)	$	(5	)		(2.7	%)
Gross profit (loss) as a % of revenue		(3.5	%)		(4.4	%)		90		bps			Gross profit (loss) as a % of revenue		(3.5	%)		(3.5	%)		0		bps

	Three Months Ended September 30,						Better / (Worse)					Three Months Ended June 30,						Better / (Worse)
	2016			2015			Change		% Change			2017			2016			Change			% Change
	(In thousands, except units and per unit data)											(In thousands, except units and per unit data)
Same store wholesale vehicle:
Revenue	$	70,029		$	37,599		$	32,430		86.3	%	$	39,524		$	38,246		$	1,278			3.3	%
Gross profit (loss)	$	(2,385	)	$	(2,420	)	$	35		1.4	%	$	(1,909	)	$	(1,840	)	$	(69	)		(3.8	%)
Unit sales		10,323			7,722			2,601		33.7	%		7,577			7,212			365			5.1	%
Revenue per unit	$	6,784		$	4,869		$	1,915		39.3	%	$	5,216		$	5,303		$	(87	)		(1.6	%)
Gross profit (loss) per unit	$	(231	)	$	(313	)	$	82		26.2	%	$	(252	)	$	(255	)	$	3			1.2	%
Gross profit (loss) as a % of revenue		(3.4	%)		(6.4	%)		300	bps				(4.8	%)		(4.8	%)		0		bps

	Nine Months Ended September 30,						Better / (Worse)						Six Months Ended June 30,						Better / (Worse)
	2016			2015			Change			% Change			2017			2016			Change			% Change
	(In thousands, except units and per unit data)												(In thousands, except units and per unit data)
Same store wholesale vehicle:
Revenue	$	152,627		$	119,269		$	33,358			28.0	%	$	84,784		$	82,599		$	2,185			2.6	%
Gross profit (loss)	$	(5,300	)	$	(5,072	)	$	(228	)		(4.5	%)	$	(2,994	)	$	(2,915	)	$	(79	)		(2.7	%)
Unit sales		25,953			23,300			2,653			11.4	%		15,697			15,630			67			0.4	%
Revenue per unit	$	5,881		$	5,119		$	762			14.9	%	$	5,401		$	5,285		$	116			2.2	%
Gross profit (loss) per unit	$	(204	)	$	(218	)	$	14			6.4	%	$	(191	)	$	(187	)	$	(4	)		(2.1	%)
Gross profit (loss) as a % of revenue		(3.5	%)		(4.3	%)		80		bps				(3.5	%)		(3.5	%)		0		bps

Wholesale vehicle revenue, gross loss and unit sales volume increased due to higher levels of wholesale activity as a result of elevated inventory levels during the first quarter of 2017. Wholesale vehicle revenue and unit sales volume fluctuations are typically a result of retail new and used vehicle unit sales volumes that generate additional trade-in vehicle volume that we are not always able to sell as retail used vehicles and choose to sell at auction. Whenever possible, we prefer to sell a used vehicle through retail channels rather than wholesaling the vehicle at auction.

~~Three~~Six Months Ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017 Compared to ~~Three~~Six Months Ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2015~~2016

Wholesale vehicle revenue and unit sales volume increased, while wholesale gross loss decreased on lower wholesale gross loss per unit due to higher average auction prices. Wholesale unit sales volume as a percentage of total used vehicle unit sales volume (retail plus wholesale) increased 490 basis points as we optimized our used vehicle inventory for current consumer demand heading into the fourth quarter.

~~Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015~~

Wholesale vehicle revenue, gross loss and unit sales volume increased due to higher levels of wholesale activity as a result of elevated inventory levels during the first ~~quarter~~half of ~~2016.~~2017. Wholesale vehicle revenue and unit sales volume asfluctuations are typically a ~~percentage~~result of ~~total~~retail new and used vehicle unit sales

~~MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS~~

volumes that generate additional trade-in vehicle volume ~~(retail plus wholesale) increased 160 basis points~~that we are not always able to sell as retail used vehicles and choose to sell at auction. Whenever possible, we ~~optimized our~~prefer to sell a used vehicle ~~inventory for current consumer demand heading into~~through retail channels rather than wholesaling the ~~fourth quarter.~~vehicle at auction.

Fixed Operations revenue consists of customer requested orders (“customer pay”), warranty repairs, wholesale parts and internal, sublet and other. Parts and service revenue is driven by the mix of warranty repairs versus customer pay repairs, available

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

service capacity, vehicle quality, manufacturer recalls, customer loyalty and manufacturer prepaid maintenance programs. Internal, sublet and other primarily relates to preparation and reconditioning work performed on vehicles that are sold to customers. When that work is performed by one of our dealerships, the work is classified as internal. In the event the work is performed by a third party on our behalf, it is classified as sublet.

We believe that over time vehicle quality will improve but vehicle complexity and the associated demand for repairs at our franchised dealerships will offset any revenue lost from improvement in vehicle quality. We also believe that over the long term we have the ability to continue to add service capacity and increase revenues. Manufacturers continue to extend new vehicle warranty periods and have also begun to include regular maintenance items in the warranty coverage. These factors, over the long term, combined with the extended manufacturer warranties on certified pre-owned vehicles, should facilitate long-term growth in our service and parts business. Barriers to long-term growth may include reductions in the rate paid by manufacturers to dealers for warranty work performed, as well as the improved quality of vehicles that may affect the level and frequency of future warranty related revenues.

In 2017, we changed the character of certain repair orders from customer pay to warranty. Accordingly, the customer pay and warranty amounts in the tables below reflect this change for the periods in 2017, but not for the periods in 2016, as it was administratively impractical to recalculate the 2016 amounts.

The following tables provide a reconciliation of same store basis and reported basis for Fixed Operations:

	Three Months Ended September 30,				Better / (Worse)						Three Months Ended June 30,				Better / (Worse)
	2016		2015		Change			% Change			2017		2016		Change		% Change
	(In thousands)										(In thousands)
Total Fixed Operations revenue:
Same store	$	360,211	$	346,831	$	13,380			3.9	%	$	356,484	$	351,310	$	5,174		1.5	%
Acquisitions and dispositions		1,498		3,689		(2,191	)		(59.4	%)		4,629		19		4,610	NM
Total as reported	$	361,709	$	350,520	$	11,189			3.2	%	$	361,113	$	351,329	$	9,784		2.8	%

Total Fixed Operations gross profit:
Same store	$	168,999	$	167,865	$	1,134			0.7	%	$	171,113	$	168,132	$	2,981		1.8	%
Acquisitions and dispositions		1,004		1,872		(868	)		(46.4	%)		1,957		89		1,868	NM
Total as reported	$	170,003	$	169,737	$	266			0.2	%	$	173,070	$	168,221	$	4,849		2.9	%

	Nine Months Ended September 30,				Better / (Worse)						Six Months Ended June 30,				Better / (Worse)
	2016		2015		Change			% Change			2017		2016		Change		% Change
	(In thousands)										(In thousands)
Total Fixed Operations revenue:
Same store	$	1,057,576	$	1,005,139	$	52,437			5.2	%	$	705,928	$	697,365	$	8,563		1.2	%
Acquisitions and dispositions		1,517		14,739		(13,222	)		(89.7	%)		7,228		19		7,209	NM
Total as reported	$	1,059,093	$	1,019,878	$	39,215			3.8	%	$	713,156	$	697,384	$	15,772		2.3	%

Total Fixed Operations gross profit:
Same store	$	502,780	$	489,099	$	13,681			2.8	%	$	338,591	$	333,781	$	4,810		1.4	%
Acquisitions and dispositions		1,446		7,248		(5,802	)		(80.0	%)		3,823		441		3,382	NM
Total as reported	$	504,226	$	496,347	$	7,879			1.6	%	$	342,414	$	334,222	$	8,192		2.5	%

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

	Three Months Ended September 30,						Better / (Worse)						Three Months Ended June 30,						Better / (Worse)
	2016			2015			Change			% Change			2017			2016			Change			% Change
	(In thousands)												(In thousands)
Reported Fixed Operations:
Revenue
Customer pay	$	146,365		$	147,308		$	(943	)		(0.6	%)	$	139,194		$	149,248		$	(10,054	)		(6.7	%)
Warranty		60,388			58,522			1,866			3.2	%		72,661			54,812			17,849			32.6	%
Wholesale parts		44,202			45,832			(1,630	)		(3.6	%)		42,806			44,021			(1,215	)		(2.8	%)
Internal, sublet and other		110,754			98,858			11,896			12.0	%		106,452			103,248			3,204			3.1	%
Total revenue	$	361,709		$	350,520		$	11,189			3.2	%	$	361,113		$	351,329		$	9,784			2.8	%
Gross profit
Customer pay	$	79,153		$	80,588		$	(1,435	)		(1.8	%)	$	74,344		$	81,323		$	(6,979	)		(8.6	%)
Warranty		32,176			32,337			(161	)		(0.5	%)		40,319			29,449			10,870			36.9	%
Wholesale parts		7,566			8,045			(479	)		(6.0	%)		7,331			7,797			(466	)		(6.0	%)
Internal, sublet and other		51,108			48,767			2,341			4.8	%		51,076			49,652			1,424			2.9	%
Total gross profit	$	170,003		$	169,737		$	266			0.2	%	$	173,070		$	168,221		$	4,849			2.9	%
Gross profit as a % of revenue
Customer pay		54.1	%		54.7	%		(60	)	bps				53.4	%		54.5	%		(110	)	bps
Warranty		53.3	%		55.3	%		(200	)	bps				55.5	%		53.7	%		180		bps
Wholesale parts		17.1	%		17.6	%		(50	)	bps				17.1	%		17.7	%		(60	)	bps
Internal, sublet and other		46.1	%		49.3	%		(320	)	bps				48.0	%		48.1	%		(10	)	bps
Total gross profit as a % of revenue		47.0	%		48.4	%		(140	)	bps				47.9	%		47.9	%		0		bps

Nine Months Ended September 30,

Better / (Worse)

2016

2015

Change

% Change

(In thousands)

Reported Fixed Operations:

Revenue

Customer pay

$
443,007

$
431,479

$
11,528

2.7
%
Warranty

172,759

169,170

3,589

2.1
%
Wholesale parts

133,533

136,693

(3,160
)

(2.3
%)
Internal, sublet and other

309,794

282,536

27,258

9.6
%
Total revenue

$
1,059,093

$
1,019,878

$
39,215

3.8
%
Gross profit

Customer pay

$
240,833

$
236,551

$
4,282

1.8
%
Warranty

92,951

94,776

(1,825
)

(1.9
%)
Wholesale parts

23,305

24,332

(1,027
)

(4.2
%)
Internal, sublet and other

147,137

140,688

6,449

4.6
%
Total gross profit

$
504,226

$
496,347

$
7,879

1.6
%
Gross profit as a % of revenue

Customer pay

54.4
%

54.8
%

(40
)

bps

Warranty

53.8
%

56.0
%

(220
)

bps

Wholesale parts

17.5
%

17.8
%

(30
)

bps

Internal, sublet and other

47.5
%

49.8
%

(230
)

bps

Total gross profit as a % of revenue

47.6
%

48.7
%

(110
)

bps

~~MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS~~

Three Months Ended September 30,

Better / (Worse)

2016

2015

Change

% Change

(In thousands)

Same store Fixed Operations:

Revenue

Customer pay

$
146,048

$
145,938

$
110

0.1
%
Warranty

60,307

57,858

2,449

4.2
%
Wholesale parts

44,199

45,270

(1,071
)

(2.4
%)
Internal, sublet and other

109,657

97,765

11,892

12.2
%
Total revenue

$
360,211

$
346,831

$
13,380

3.9
%
Gross profit

Customer pay

$
78,995

$
79,791

$
(796
)

(1.0
%)
Warranty

32,094

32,042

52

0.2
%
Wholesale parts

7,565

7,916

(351
)

(4.4
%)
Internal, sublet and other

50,345

48,116

2,229

4.6
%
Total gross profit

$
168,999

$
167,865

$
1,134

0.7
%
Gross profit as a % of revenue

Customer pay

54.1
%

54.7
%

(60
)

bps

Warranty

53.2
%

55.4
%

(220
)

bps

Wholesale parts

17.1
%

17.5
%

(40
)

bps

Internal, sublet and other

45.9
%

49.2
%

(330
)

bps

Total gross profit as a % of revenue

46.9
%

48.4
%

(150
)

bps

Nine Months Ended September 30,

Better / (Worse)

2016

2015

Change

% Change

(In thousands)

Same store Fixed Operations:

Revenue

Customer pay

$
442,688

$
424,867

$
17,821

4.2
%
Warranty

172,678

166,934

5,744

3.4
%
Wholesale parts

133,530

134,605

(1,075
)

(0.8
%)
Internal, sublet and other

308,680

278,733

29,947

10.7
%
Total revenue

$
1,057,576

$
1,005,139

$
52,437

5.2
%
Gross profit

Customer pay

$
240,675

$
232,869

$
7,806

3.4
%
Warranty

92,919

93,614

(695
)

(0.7
%)
Wholesale parts

23,304

23,906

(602
)

(2.5
%)
Internal, sublet and other

145,882

138,710

7,172

5.2
%
Total gross profit

$
502,780

$
489,099

$
13,681

2.8
%
Gross profit as a % of revenue

Customer pay

54.4
%

54.8
%

(40
)

bps

Warranty

53.8
%

56.1
%

(230
)

bps

Wholesale parts

17.5
%

17.8
%

(30
)

bps

Internal, sublet and other

47.3
%

49.8
%

(250
)

bps

Total gross profit as a % of revenue

47.5
%

48.7
%

(120
)

bps

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

	Six Months Ended June 30,						Better / (Worse)
	2017			2016			Change			% Change
	(In thousands)
Reported Fixed Operations:
Revenue
Customer pay	$	277,328		$	296,642		$	(19,314	)		(6.5	%)
Warranty		142,579			112,371			30,208			26.9	%
Wholesale parts		86,087			89,331			(3,244	)		(3.6	%)
Internal, sublet and other		207,162			199,040			8,122			4.1	%
Total revenue	$	713,156		$	697,384		$	15,772			2.3	%
Gross profit
Customer pay	$	147,784		$	161,680		$	(13,896	)		(8.6	%)
Warranty		78,989			60,775			18,214			30.0	%
Wholesale parts		14,881			15,738			(857	)		(5.4	%)
Internal, sublet and other		100,760			96,029			4,731			4.9	%
Total gross profit	$	342,414		$	334,222		$	8,192			2.5	%
Gross profit as a % of revenue
Customer pay		53.3	%		54.5	%		(120	)	bps
Warranty		55.4	%		54.1	%		130		bps
Wholesale parts		17.3	%		17.6	%		(30	)	bps
Internal, sublet and other		48.6	%		48.2	%		40		bps
Total gross profit as a % of revenue		48.0	%		47.9	%		10		bps

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Better / (Worse)
	2017			2016			Change			% Change
	(In thousands)
Same store Fixed Operations:
Revenue
Customer pay	$	138,408		$	149,246		$	(10,838	)		(7.3	%)
Warranty		72,325			54,812			17,513			32.0	%
Wholesale parts		42,478			44,021			(1,543	)		(3.5	%)
Internal, sublet and other		103,273			103,231			42			0.0	%
Total revenue	$	356,484		$	351,310		$	5,174			1.5	%
Gross profit
Customer pay	$	73,942		$	81,322		$	(7,380	)		(9.1	%)
Warranty		40,129			29,543			10,586			35.8	%
Wholesale parts		7,239			7,797			(558	)		(7.2	%)
Internal, sublet and other		49,803			49,470			333			0.7	%
Total gross profit	$	171,113		$	168,132		$	2,981			1.8	%
Gross profit as a % of revenue
Customer pay		53.4	%		54.5	%		(110	)	bps
Warranty		55.5	%		53.9	%		160		bps
Wholesale parts		17.0	%		17.7	%		(70	)	bps
Internal, sublet and other		48.2	%		47.9	%		30		bps
Total gross profit as a % of revenue		48.0	%		47.9	%		10		bps

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

	Six Months Ended June 30,						Better / (Worse)
	2017			2016			Change			% Change
	(In thousands)
Same store Fixed Operations:
Revenue
Customer pay	$	275,827		$	296,640		$	(20,813	)		(7.0	%)
Warranty		141,914			112,371			29,543			26.3	%
Wholesale parts		85,705			89,331			(3,626	)		(4.1	%)
Internal, sublet and other		202,482			199,023			3,459			1.7	%
Total revenue	$	705,928		$	697,365		$	8,563			1.2	%
Gross profit
Customer pay	$	147,031		$	161,679		$	(14,648	)		(9.1	%)
Warranty		78,568			60,825			17,743			29.2	%
Wholesale parts		14,776			15,739			(963	)		(6.1	%)
Internal, sublet and other		98,216			95,538			2,678			2.8	%
Total gross profit	$	338,591		$	333,781		$	4,810			1.4	%
Gross profit as a % of revenue
Customer pay		53.3	%		54.5	%		(120	)	bps
Warranty		55.4	%		54.1	%		130		bps
Wholesale parts		17.2	%		17.6	%		(40	)	bps
Internal, sublet and other		48.5	%		48.0	%		50		bps
Total gross profit as a % of revenue		48.0	%		47.9	%		10		bps

Three Months Ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017 Compared to Three Months Ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2015~~2016

Our Fixed Operations ~~customer pay~~ revenue ~~was flat and customer pay gross profit decreased~~increased approximately ~~$0.8~~$5.2 million, or ~~1.0%~~1.5%, driven primarily by ~~a decrease at~~ our BMW, Audi and Lexus dealerships, ~~offset partially by increases at~~while our ~~Audi, Land Rover and Toyota dealerships. Warranty revenue~~Fixed Operations gross profit increased approximately ~~$2.4~~$3.0 million, or ~~4.2%~~1.8%, driven primarily by ~~increases at~~ our Lexus, Honda and ~~Toyota dealerships, offset partially by decreases at our Lexus, Volkswagen~~Audi dealerships. Combined customer pay and ~~BMW dealerships. In spite of the increase in warranty revenue,~~ warranty gross profit was flat due to a 220 basis point decrease in warranty gross margin, driven primarily by gross margin declines at our Lexus and BMW dealerships due to less labor-intensive warranty work being performed. Wholesale parts revenue decreasedincreased approximately ~~$1.1~~$3.2 million, or 2.4%, and wholesale parts gross profit decreased approximately $0.4 million, or 4.4%, driven primarily by a decrease at our Mercedes dealerships. Internal, sublet and other revenue increased approximately $11.9 million, or 12.2%2.9%, and internal, sublet and other gross profit increased approximately ~~$2.2~~$0.3 million, or ~~4.6%~~0.7%, on higher levels of used vehicle reconditioning and hail damage repairs.

The increase in Fixed Operations revenue contributed approximately $6.5 million in additional gross profit, offset partially by a 150 basis point decrease in gross margin rate, which reduced the gross profit increase by approximately $5.4 million, for a net $1.1 million increase in Fixed Operations gross profit. The gross margin rate decreased primarily due to lower gross margin rates at our BMW and Lexus dealerships and a shift in Fixed Operations revenue mix from our higher-margin customer pay business to lower-margin sublet business as a result of hail damage repairs and cost associated with loaner vehicles related to customer vehicles subject to safety recalls.

~~Nine~~Six Months Ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017 Compared to ~~Nine~~Six Months Ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2015~~2016

Our Fixed Operations ~~customer pay~~ revenue increased approximately ~~$17.8~~$8.6 million, or ~~4.2%~~1.2%, driven primarily by our BMW, Lexus and ~~customer pay~~Audi dealerships, while our Fixed Operations gross profit increased approximately ~~$7.8~~$4.8 million, or ~~3.4%~~1.4%, driven primarily by ~~increases at~~ our Honda, Lexus and Audi ~~Lexus, Toyota and Honda~~ dealerships. ~~Warranty revenue increased approximately $5.7 million, or 3.4%,~~Combined customer pay and warranty gross profit ~~decreased~~increased approximately ~~$0.7~~$3.1 million, or 0.7%, driven primarily by decreases in warranty activity (including recalls) and gross margin rate at our BMW and Lexus dealerships, offset partially by increases at our Honda and Toyota dealerships. Wholesale parts revenue decreased approximately $1.1 million, or 0.8%, and wholesale parts gross profit decreased approximately $0.6 million, or 2.5%, driven primarily by a decrease at our Mercedes dealerships. Internal, sublet and other revenue increased approximately $30.0 million, or 10.7%1.4%, and internal, sublet and other gross profit increased approximately ~~$7.2~~$2.7 million, or ~~5.2%~~2.8%, on higher levels of used vehicle reconditioning and hail damage repairs.

The increase in Fixed Operations revenue contributed approximately $25.5 million in additional gross profit, offset partially by a 120 basis point decrease in gross margin rate, which reduced the gross profit increase by approximately $11.8 million, for a net $13.7 million increase in Fixed Operations gross profit. The gross margin rate decreased primarily due to lower gross margin rates at our BMW dealerships and a shift in Fixed Operations revenue mix from our higher-margin customer pay and warranty business to lower-margin sublet business as a result of hail damage repairs and cost associated with loaner vehicles related to customer vehicles subject to safety recalls.

F&I revenues include commissions for arranging vehicle financing and insurance, sales of third-party extended warranties and service contracts for vehicles and other aftermarket products. In connection with vehicle financing, extended warranties, service contracts, other aftermarket products and insurance contracts, we receive commissions from the providers for originating contracts. F&I revenues are recognized net of estimated chargebacks and other costs associated with originating contracts. F&I revenues are driven by the level of new and used vehicle unit sales, manufacturer financing or leasing incentives and our F&I penetration rate. The F&I penetration rate represents the number of finance contracts, extended warranties, service contracts, other aftermarket products and insurance contracts that we are able to originate per vehicle sold, expressed as a percentage.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following tables provide a reconciliation of same store basis and reported basis for F&I:

	Three Months Ended September 30,					Better / (Worse)					Three Months Ended June 30,				Better / (Worse)
	2016		2015			Change		% Change			2017		2016		Change		% Change
	(In thousands, except per unit data)										(In thousands, except per unit data)
Total F&I revenue:
Same store	$	88,551	$	84,981		$	3,570		4.2	%	$	84,457	$	83,884	$	573		0.7	%
Acquisitions and dispositions		1,028		849			179		21.1	%		2,451		204		2,247	NM
Total as reported	$	89,579	$	85,830		$	3,749		4.4	%	$	86,908	$	84,088	$	2,820		3.4	%

Total F&I gross profit per retail unit (excludes fleet):
Same store	$	1,341	$	1,276		$	65		5.1	%	$	1,374	$	1,342	$	32		2.4	%
Acquisitions and dispositions		3		(2	)		5		250.0	%
Total as reported	$	1,344	$	1,274		$	70		5.5	%	$	1,379	$	1,345	$	34		2.5	%

	Nine Months Ended September 30,					Better / (Worse)						Six Months Ended June 30,				Better / (Worse)
	2016		2015			Change			% Change			2017		2016		Change		% Change
	(In thousands, except per unit data)											(In thousands, except per unit data)
Total F&I revenue:
Same store	$	253,287	$	240,163		$	13,124			5.5	%	$	165,318	$	164,736	$	582		0.4	%
Acquisitions and dispositions		1,653		2,629			(976	)		(37.1	%)		4,653		625		4,028	NM
Total as reported	$	254,940	$	242,792		$	12,148			5.0	%	$	169,971	$	165,361	$	4,610		2.8	%

Total F&I gross profit per retail unit (excludes fleet):
Same store	$	1,347	$	1,267		$	80			6.3	%	$	1,372	$	1,350	$	22		1.6	%
Acquisitions and dispositions		4		(1	)		5			500.0	%
Total as reported	$	1,351	$	1,266		$	85			6.7	%	$	1,379	$	1,355	$	24		1.8	%

Three Months Ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017 Compared to Three Months Ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2015~~2016

F&I revenues increased approximately ~~$3.6~~$0.6 million, or ~~4.2%~~0.7%, and F&I gross profit per retail unit increased ~~$65 per unit,~~$32, or ~~5.1%, to $1,341 per unit.~~2.4%. The growth in F&I revenues and gross profit per retail unit is attributed to ~~improved penetration rates on finance~~an increase in gross profit per service and ~~service~~other aftermarket contracts ~~as a result of~~due to additional product offerings and increased visibility into performance drivers provided by our proprietary internal software ~~applications, which~~applications. These increases in gross profit per contract more than offset the impact of ~~lower~~a 1.6% decrease in combined retail new and used vehicle unit sales ~~volume.~~volume and lower penetration rates.

Finance contract revenue ~~increased 4.4%~~decreased 5.6%, primarily due to a ~~340~~60 basis point ~~increase~~decrease in the combined new and used vehicle finance contract penetration ~~rate.~~rate and a 3.2% decrease in gross profit per finance contract. Finance contract revenue may be under pressure in future periods if manufacturers offer attractive financing rates from their captive finance affiliates because we tend to earn lower commissions under these programs. Service contract revenue increased ~~10.1%~~5.4% due primarily to ~~a 180 basis point increase in the service contract penetration rate and a 5.4%~~an 11.8% increase in gross profit per service ~~contract.~~contract, offset partially by a 150 basis point decrease in the service contract penetration rate. Other aftermarket contract revenue ~~decreased 0.9%~~increased 3.4%, driven primarily by an 8.9% increase in gross profit per aftermarket contract, offset partially by a ~~1,010~~440 basis point decrease in the other aftermarket penetration ~~rate, offset partially by a 7.9% increase in gross profit per aftermarket contract.~~rate.

~~Nine~~Six Months Ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017 Compared to ~~Nine~~Six Months Ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2015~~2016

F&I revenues increased approximately ~~$13.1~~$0.6 million, or ~~5.5%~~0.4%, and F&I gross profit per retail unit increased ~~$80 per unit,~~$22, or ~~6.3%, to $1,347 per unit.~~1.6%. The growth in F&I revenues and gross profit per retail unit is attributed to ~~improved penetration rates on finance~~an increase in gross profit per service and ~~service~~other aftermarket contracts ~~as a result of~~due to additional product offerings and increased visibility into performance drivers provided by our proprietary internal software ~~applications, which~~applications. These increases in gross profit per contract more than offset the impact of ~~lower~~a 1.2% decrease in combined retail new and used vehicle unit sales ~~volume.~~volume and lower penetration rates.

Finance contract revenue ~~increased 4.0%~~decreased 6.1%, primarily due to a ~~420~~120 basis point ~~increase~~decrease in the combined new and used vehicle finance contract penetration ~~rate.~~rate and a 3.4% decrease in gross profit per finance contract. Finance contract revenue may be under pressure in future periods if manufacturers offer attractive

~~MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS~~

financing rates from their captive finance affiliates because we tend to earn lower commissions under these programs. Service contract revenue increased ~~12.9%~~5.9% due primarily to a ~~240~~12.0% increase in gross profit

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

per service contract, offset partially by a 160 basis point ~~increase~~decrease in the service contract penetration ~~rate and a 6.1% increase in gross profit per service contract.~~rate. Other aftermarket contract revenue increased ~~0.2%~~3.3%, driven primarily by an ~~8.1%~~8.6% increase in gross profit per aftermarket contract, offset partially by a ~~910~~480 basis point decrease in the other aftermarket penetration rate. During the six months ended June 30, 2017, we began offering service and other aftermarket products from a new vendor, the transition to which disrupted our associates’ selling processes and led to lower penetration rates and gross profit than we would expect going forward. We anticipate that our service contract penetration rate will return to previous levels once the transition period is complete and our associates are more comfortable explaining the benefits provided to our guests by the new product offerings.

In the following tables of financial data, total segment income (loss) of the operating segments is reconciled to consolidated operating income (loss).

	Three Months Ended September 30,						Better / (Worse)						Three Months Ended June 30,						Better / (Worse)
	2016			2015			Change			% Change			2017			2016			Change			% Change
	(In thousands, except unit data)												(In thousands, except unit data)
Revenues:
Franchised Dealerships	$	2,517,526		$	2,472,357		$	45,169			1.8	%	$	2,356,692		$	2,352,840		$	3,852			0.2	%
EchoPark^®		40,402			22,051			18,351			83.2	%
EchoPark														49,054			29,472			19,582			66.4	%
Total consolidated revenues	$	2,557,928		$	2,494,408		$	63,520			2.5	%	$	2,405,746		$	2,382,312		$	23,434			1.0	%
Segment income (loss) (1):
Franchised Dealerships	$	47,852		$	61,104		$	(13,252	)		(21.7	%)	$	40,544		$	53,561		$	(13,017	)		(24.3	%)
EchoPark^®		(3,597	)		(3,545	)		(52	)		(1.5	%)
EchoPark														(7,517	)		(3,206	)		(4,311	)		(134.5	%)
Total segment income (loss)		44,255			57,559			(13,304	)		(23.1	%)		33,027			50,355			(17,328	)		(34.4	%)
Interest expense, other, net		(13,016	)		(12,361	)		(655	)		(5.3	%)		(12,764	)		(12,205	)		(559	)		(4.6	%)
Other income (expense), net		11			-			11			100.0	%		7			6			1			16.7	%
Income (loss) from continuing operations before taxes	$	31,250		$	45,198		$	(13,948	)		(30.9	%)	$	20,270		$	38,156		$	(17,886	)		(46.9	%)

(1) Segment income (loss) for each segment is defined as operating income less floor plan interest expense.

Retail new and used vehicle unit sales volume:
Franchised Dealerships		65,190			66,438			(1,248	)		(1.9	%)		60,953			61,380			(427	)		(0.7	%)
EchoPark^®		1,458			920			538			58.5	%
EchoPark														2,049			1,136			913			80.4	%
Total retail new and used vehicle unit sales volume		66,648			67,358			(710	)		(1.1	%)		63,002			62,516			486			0.8	%

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

	Nine Months Ended September 30,						Better / (Worse)						Six Months Ended June 30,						Better / (Worse)
	2016			2015			Change			% Change			2017			2016			Change			% Change
	(In thousands, except unit data)												(In thousands, except unit data)
Revenues:
Franchised Dealerships	$	7,080,952		$	7,094,951		$	(13,999	)		(0.2	%)	$	4,602,717		$	4,563,425		$	39,292			0.9	%
EchoPark^®		93,914			58,712			35,202			60.0	%
EchoPark														90,851			53,514			37,337			69.8	%
Total consolidated revenues	$	7,174,866		$	7,153,663		$	21,203			0.3	%	$	4,693,568		$	4,616,939		$	76,629			1.7	%
Segment income (loss) (1):
Franchised Dealerships	$	140,705		$	145,888		$	(5,183	)		(3.6	%)	$	74,013		$	92,854		$	(18,841	)		(20.3	%)
EchoPark^®		(10,225	)		(13,827	)		3,602			26.1	%
EchoPark														(12,924	)		(6,630	)		(6,294	)		(94.9	%)
Total segment income (loss)		130,480			132,061			(1,581	)		(1.2	%)		61,089			86,224			(25,135	)		(29.2	%)
Interest expense, other, net		(37,560	)		(38,635	)		1,075			2.8	%		(26,172	)		(24,544	)		(1,628	)		(6.6	%)
Other income (expense), net		120			102			18			17.6	%		(14,495	)		110			(14,605	)		(13277.3	%)
Income (loss) from continuing operations before taxes	$	93,040		$	93,528		$	(488	)		(0.5	%)	$	20,422		$	61,790		$	(41,368	)		(66.9	%)

(1) Segment income (loss) for each segment is defined as operating income less floor plan interest expense

Retail new and used vehicle unit sales volume:
Franchised Dealerships		185,118			189,343			(4,225	)		(2.2	%)		119,522			119,928			(406	)		(0.3	%)
EchoPark^®		3,535			2,461			1,074			43.6	%
EchoPark														3,722			2,077			1,645			79.2	%
Total retail new and used vehicle unit sales volume		188,653			191,804			(3,151	)		(1.6	%)		123,244			122,005			1,239			1.0	%

(1)Segment income (loss) for each segment is defined as operating income (loss) less interest expense, floor plan.

See the previous headings “New Vehicles,” “Used Vehicles,” “Wholesale Vehicles,” “Parts, Service and Collision Repair (“Fixed Operations”)” and “Finance, Insurance and Other, Net (“F&I”)” for further discussion of the operating results of our Franchised Dealerships and EchoPark^®segments. The previous tables and discussion include operating results for our EchoPark^® segment as the results for EchoPark^® are not individually material to the combined operating results.

We opened the first two EchoPark^® locations in Colorado in November and December 2014, the third location in January 2015, ~~and~~ the fourth and fifth locations in June ~~2016. We~~2016 and the sixth location in June 2017. During 2017 and 2018, we expect to ~~open an additional~~break ground on approximately 15 EchoPark^®~~store in Colorado~~ locations in the ~~first half of 2017, and have begun the process of expanding EchoPark~~^® ~~operations into additional markets in~~Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina and Texas ~~with operations in certain of these markets expected to begin in 2017.~~markets. Our EchoPark^® business operates independently from our previously existing new and used dealership sales operations and offers customers an exciting shopping and buying experience.

During the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, EchoPark^® generated approximately ~~$40.4~~$49.1 million of revenue, up ~~$18.4~~$19.6 million, or ~~83.2%~~66.4%, ~~from the prior year period,~~ and gross profit of approximately ~~$4.2~~$5.3 million, up ~~$1.3~~$2.0 million, or ~~44.8%, from the prior year period.~~58.5%. EchoPark^®retail used vehicle unit sales volume was ~~1,458~~2,049 units, up ~~538~~913 units, or ~~58.5%~~80.4%, ~~from the prior year period,~~ and retail used vehicle gross profit per unit was ~~$1,011 per unit,~~$875, a decrease of ~~$458 per unit,~~$167, or ~~31.2%~~16.0%, ~~from the prior year period,~~ due primarily to ~~differences in model mix between periods.~~higher costs of acquisition of inventory at auction as we ramped up inventory at our newest locations. EchoPark^® F&I gross profit per unit was ~~$1,078 per unit, up $151 per unit,~~$1,041, down $99, or ~~16.3%~~8.7%, from the prior year period, driven by lower F&I gross profit per unit at the stores opened in the last twelve months. We believe that as the operating runway at these stores grows, our training and playbook processes ~~enabled~~will enable our customer experience guides to more effectively provide F&I products to our ~~customers.~~customers and achieve targeted levels of F&I gross profit per unit. EchoPark^® incurred a ~~$3.8~~$7.2 million operating loss during the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, compared to a ~~$3.7~~$3.0 million operating loss in the prior year ~~period.~~period, driven primarily by start-up costs associated with opening new stores and approximately $2.4 million of impairment and lease exit charges associated with the closure of two of the stand-alone pre-owned stores we acquired in 2016.

During the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, EchoPark^® generated approximately ~~$93.9~~$90.9 million of revenue, up ~~$35.2~~$37.3 million, or ~~60.0%~~69.8%, ~~from the prior year period,~~ and gross profit of approximately ~~$10.8~~$10.0 million, up ~~$3.5~~$3.4 million, or ~~48.0%, from the prior year period.~~51.2%. EchoPark^®retail used vehicle unit sales volume was ~~3,535~~3,722 units, up ~~1,074~~1,645 units, or ~~43.6%~~79.2%, ~~from the prior year period,~~ and retail used vehicle gross profit per unit was ~~$1,122 per unit,~~$952, a decrease of ~~$253 per unit,~~$248, or ~~18.4%~~20.7%, ~~from the prior year period,~~ due primarily to ~~differences in model mix between periods.~~higher costs of acquisition of inventory at auction as we ramped up inventory at our newest locations. EchoPark^® F&I gross profit per unit was ~~$1,176 per unit, up $265 per unit,~~$1,102, down $142, or ~~29.1%~~11.4%, from the prior year period, driven by lower F&I gross profit per unit at the stores opened in the last twelve months. We believe that as the operating runway at these stores grows, our training and playbook ~~processes enabled our customer experience guides to more effectively provide F&I products to our customers. EchoPark~~^® ~~incurred a $10.7 million operating loss during the nine months ended~~

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

~~September~~processes will enable our customer experience guides to more effectively provide F&I products to our customers and achieve targeted levels of F&I gross profit per unit. EchoPark incurred a $12.4 million operating loss during the six months ended June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, compared to a ~~$12.7~~$6.2 million operating loss in the prior year period, ~~excluding~~driven primarily by start-up costs associated with opening new stores and approximately $2.4 million of impairment and lease exit charges associated with the ~~effects~~closure of ~~a $1.4 million impairment charge~~two of the stand-alone pre-owned stores we acquired in ~~the prior year period.~~2016.

SG&A expenses are comprised of four major groups: compensation expense, advertising expense, rent expense and other expense. Compensation expense primarily relates to dealership personnel who are paid a commission or a salary plus commission and support personnel who are paid a fixed salary. Commissions paid to dealership personnel typically vary depending on gross profits realized and sales volume objectives. Due to the salary component for certain dealership and corporate personnel, gross profits and compensation expense do not change in direct proportion to one another. Advertising expense and other expense vary based on the level of actual or anticipated business activity and number of dealerships owned. Rent expense typically varies with the number of dealerships owned, investments made for facility improvements and interest rates. Other expense includes various fixed and variable expenses, including certain customer-related costs (e.g., gasoline and service loaners), insurance, training, legal and IT expenses, which may not change in proportion to gross profit levels.

The following tables set forth information related to our reported SG&A expenses:

	Three Months Ended September 30,						Better / (Worse)						Three Months Ended June 30,						Better / (Worse)
	2016			2015			Change			% Change			2017			2016			Change			% Change
	(In thousands)												(In thousands)
SG&A expenses:
Compensation	$	171,287		$	167,489		$	(3,798	)		(2.3	%)	$	171,182		$	166,560		$	(4,622	)		(2.8	%)
Advertising		14,987			15,470			483			3.1	%		15,344			15,499			155			1.0	%
Rent		18,037			18,558			521			2.8	%		19,110			18,508			(602	)		(3.3	%)
Other		77,830			78,524			694			0.9	%		88,295			76,637			(11,658	)		(15.2	%)
Total SG&A expenses	$	282,141		$	280,041		$	(2,100	)		(0.7	%)	$	293,931		$	277,204		$	(16,727	)		(6.0	%)

SG&A expenses as a % of gross profit:
Compensation		47.7	%		46.5	%		(120	)	bps				47.5	%		47.1	%		(40	)	bps
Advertising		4.2	%		4.3	%		10		bps				4.3	%		4.4	%		10		bps
Rent		5.0	%		5.2	%		20		bps				5.3	%		5.2	%		(10	)	bps
Other		21.7	%		21.7	%		0		bps				24.4	%		21.8	%		(260	)	bps
Total SG&A expenses as a % of gross profit		78.6	%		77.7	%		(90	)	bps				81.5	%		78.5	%		(300	)	bps

	Nine Months Ended September 30,						Better / (Worse)						Six Months Ended June 30,						Better / (Worse)
	2016			2015			Change			% Change			2017			2016			Change			% Change
	(In thousands)												(In thousands)
SG&A expenses:
Compensation	$	506,894		$	497,158		$	(9,736	)		(2.0	%)	$	347,729		$	335,601		$	(12,128	)		(3.6	%)
Advertising		45,834			46,160			326			0.7	%		30,602			30,847			245			0.8	%
Rent		55,265			55,058			(207	)		(0.4	%)		37,598			37,228			(370	)		(1.0	%)
Other		235,728			237,188			1,460			0.6	%		170,236			157,904			(12,332	)		(7.8	%)
Total SG&A expenses	$	843,721		$	835,564		$	(8,157	)		(1.0	%)	$	586,165		$	561,580		$	(24,585	)		(4.4	%)

SG&A expenses as a % of gross profit:
Compensation		47.9	%		47.3	%		(60	)	bps				48.9	%		48.0	%		(90	)	bps
Advertising		4.3	%		4.4	%		10		bps				4.3	%		4.4	%		10		bps
Rent		5.2	%		5.2	%		0		bps				5.3	%		5.3	%		0		bps
Other		22.4	%		22.6	%		20		bps				23.9	%		22.7	%		(120	)	bps
Total SG&A expenses as a % of gross profit		79.8	%		79.5	%		(30	)	bps				82.4	%		80.4	%		(200	)	bps

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Three Months Ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017 Compared to Three Months Ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2015~~2016

Overall SG&A expenses increased both in dollar amount and as a percentage of gross profit, primarily due to storm-related physical damage costs, higher compensation and employee benefit-related expenses related to new manufacturer-awarded open points and EchoPark locations, IT expenses and legal expenses in the three months ended June 30, 2017. Overall SG&A expenses as a percentage of gross profit increased 300 basis points.

Compensation expense increased both in dollar amount and as a percentage of gross profit, primarily due to higher levels of compensation and employee benefit-related expenses related to new manufacturer-awarded open points and EchoPark locations.

Advertising expense decreased slightly both in dollar amount and as a percentage of gross profit, as we focused on targeted advertising where we would expect the best returns for our business.

Rent expense increased both in dollar amount and as a percentage of gross profit due primarily to lease exit charges related to the relocation of a dealership and the closure of two stand-alone pre-owned stores acquired in 2016.

Other SG&A expenses increased both in dollar amount and as a percentage of gross profit due primarily to increases in storm-related physical damage costs, legal accruals and IT expenses.

On an adjusted basis, SG&A expenses as a percentage of gross profit were 79.7%, up 120 basis points from the prior year period. For the three months ended June 30, 2017, adjusted SG&A expenses exclude approximately $4.6 million of expense due to storm-related physical damage, approximately $1.0 million related to legal accruals and approximately $1.0 million of lease exit charges. There were no adjustments for the three months ended June 30, 2016.

Overall SG&A expenses increased both in dollar amount and as a percentage of gross profit, primarily due to higher compensation and employee benefit-related expenses, IT expenses, customer-related costs and ~~repairs and maintenance expenses combined with lower overall gross profit.~~storm-related physical damage costs in the six months ended June 30, 2017. Overall SG&A expenses as a percentage of gross profit increased 90200 basis points.

Compensation expense increased both in dollar amount and as a percentage of gross profit, primarily due to higher levels of compensation and employee benefit-related expenses ~~Fixed Operations compensation~~related to new manufacturer-awarded open points and ~~F&I compensation.~~EchoPark locations.

Advertising expense decreased slightly both in dollar amount and as a percentage of gross profit, as we focused on targeted advertising where we would expect the best returns for our business.

Rent expense was relatively flat both in dollar amount and as a percentage of gross profit due to the combined effects of our strategy to own more of our dealership properties and lower overall levels of gross profit.

~~Other SG&A expenses decreased~~increased in dollar amount and was flat as a percentage of gross profit due primarily to ~~a benefit~~lease exit charges related to ~~estimated~~the relocation of a dealership and the closure of two stand-alone pre-owned stores acquired in 2016.

Other SG&A expenses increased both in dollar amount and as a percentage of gross profit due primarily to increases in IT expenses, storm-related physical damage ~~in the current period and lower gasoline and delivery expenses, offset partially by higher IT expenses~~costs, customer-related costs, legal accruals and repairs and ~~maintenance expenses.~~maintenance.

On an adjusted basis, SG&A expenses as a percentage of gross profit ~~was 79.2%~~were 81.3%, up ~~150~~180 basis points from the prior year period. For the ~~three~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, 2017, adjusted SG&A expenses exclude approximately $7.0 million of expense due to storm-related physical damage and approximately $1.0 million of lease exit charges, offset partially by a net benefit of approximately $0.1 million related to legal settlements. For the six months ended June 30, 2016, adjusted SG&A expenses exclude ~~a benefit~~approximately $6.0 million of ~~approximately $2.4 million related~~expense due to ~~estimated~~ storm-related physical ~~damage and $0.1 million of legal expenses. For the three months ended September 30, 2015, there were no adjustments to SG&A expenses.~~damage.

~~Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015~~

Overall SG&A expenses increased both in dollar amount and as a percentage of gross profit, primarily due to higher compensation-related expenses, repairs and maintenance expenses and IT expenses. Overall SG&A expenses as a percentage of gross profit increased 30 basis points.

Compensation expense increased both in dollar amount and as a percentage of gross profit, due primarily to higher levels of employee benefit-related expenses, Fixed Operations compensation and F&I compensation, offset partially by lower medical insurance expense as a result of better claims experience in the current period.

~~Advertising expense decreased both in dollar amount and as a percentage of gross profit as we focused on targeted advertising where we would expect the best returns for our business.~~

Rent expense was relatively flat both in dollar amount and as a percentage of gross profit due primarily to our strategy to own more of our dealership properties, offset by higher rent expense for additional inventory storage needs.

Other SG&A expenses decreased both in dollar amount and as a percentage of gross profit due primarily to lower gasoline, delivery and legal expenses, offset partially by storm-related physical damage charges, IT expenses and higher repairs and maintenance expenses.

On an adjusted basis, SG&A expenses as a percentage of gross profit was 79.4%, up 30 basis points from the prior year period. For the nine months ended September 30, 2016, adjusted SG&A expenses exclude a charge of approximately $3.6 million related to hail damage and $0.1 million of legal expenses. For the nine months ended September 30, 2015, adjusted SG&A expenses exclude the effect of approximately $3.5 million of storm-related physical damage and $0.6 million of legal expenses, partially offset by net disposal gain of $0.7 million.

Impairment charges for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 were approximately $6.1 million and $6.2 million, respectively. Impairment charges for the three months ended September 30, 2015 were immaterial and for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 were approximately $16.7 million. Impairment charges for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 include the write-off of property and equipment to be demolished in conjunction with a facility construction project and the write-off of costs associated with abandonment of certain construction projects. Impairment charges for the three and nine months ended

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Impairment charges increased approximately $2.4 million and $3.0 million during the three and six months ended June 30, ~~2015~~ 2017, respectively. Impairment charges for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 include the write-off of goodwill ~~intangible assets,~~and property and equipment ~~as part~~related to the closure of ~~the disposal of a franchise,~~two stand-alone pre-owned stores that were purchased in 2016, in addition to the write-off of ~~certain~~capitalized costs associated with ~~website~~abandonment of certain construction projects. Impairment charges for the three and ~~software development projects as well as~~six months ended June 30, 2016 include the write-off of capitalized costs associated with abandonment of certain construction projects.

Depreciation and amortization expense increased approximately ~~$2.7~~$3.0 million, or ~~15.5%~~15.9%, and ~~$6.4~~$5.7 million, or ~~12.5%~~15.2%, during the three and ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~ June 30, ~~2016, respectively,~~2017, due primarily to completed construction projects and purchases of fixed assets ~~that were placed~~for use in ~~service subsequent to September 30, 2016.~~our franchised dealerships and EchoPark stores.

Interest expense, floor plan for new vehicles increased approximately ~~$0.9~~$2.2 million, or ~~17.6%, and $3.8 million, or 26.9%, in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively.~~36.1%. The average new vehicle floor plan notes payable balance increased approximately ~~$41.2~~$69.1 million, ~~and $163.1~~resulting in an increase in new vehicle floor plan interest expense of approximately $0.3 million. The average new vehicle floor plan interest rate was 2.38%, compared to 1.84%, resulting in an increase in new vehicle floor plan interest expense of approximately $1.9 million.

Interest expense, floor plan for used vehicles increased approximately $0.2 million, or 43.6%. The average used vehicle floor plan notes payable balance decreased approximately $10.2 million, which did not materially impact floor plan interest expense. The average used vehicle floor plan interest rate was 2.27%, compared to 1.47%, resulting in ~~the three and nine months ended September~~an increase in used vehicle floor plan interest expense of approximately $0.2 million.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2016 ~~respectively,~~

Interest expense, floor plan for new vehicles increased approximately $3.8 million, or 31.3%. The average new vehicle floor plan notes payable balance increased approximately $20.8 million, resulting in an increase in new vehicle floor plan interest expense of approximately $0.2 ~~million and $2.0 million in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively.~~million. The average new vehicle floor plan interest rate was ~~1.86% and 1.79% in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively,~~2.28%, compared to ~~1.63% and 1.61% in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively,~~1.76%, resulting in an increase in new vehicle floor plan interest expense of approximately ~~$0.7 million and $1.8 million in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively.~~$3.6 million.

Interest expense, floor plan for used vehicles increased approximately ~~$0.4~~$0.6 million, or ~~131.3%, and $0.5 million, or 37.8%, in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively.~~58.9%. The average used vehicle floor plan notes payable balance increased approximately ~~$90.7~~$1.1 million, ~~and $49.8 million in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively,~~which did not materially impact floor plan interest expense. The average used vehicle floor plan interest rate was 2.41%, compared to 1.53%, resulting in an increase in used vehicle floor plan interest expense of approximately $0.3 million and $0.7 million the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively. The average used vehicle floor plan interest rate was 1.71% and 1.62% in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively, compared to 1.57% and 1.76% in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively, resulting in an increase in used vehicle floor plan interest expense of approximately $0.1 million and a decrease of $0.2 million in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, our used vehicle inventory levels were elevated due to a significant number of “stop-sale” vehicles held in inventory as a result of open safety recalls on certain models where the manufacturer instructed dealers to not sell the particular model until the recall work was performed, contributing to the higher floor plan balances and related interest expense.$0.6 million.

	Three Months Ended September 30,						Better / (Worse)						Three Months Ended June 30,						Better / (Worse)
	2016			2015			Change			% Change			2017			2016			Change			% Change
	(In thousands)												(In thousands)
Stated/coupon interest	$	11,448		$	10,687		$	(761	)		(7.1	%)	$	12,041		$	11,088		$	(953	)		(8.6	%)
Discount/premium amortization		41			38			(3	)		(7.9	%)		-			40			40			100.0	%
Deferred loan cost amortization		636			625			(11	)		(1.8	%)		588			628			40			6.4	%
Cash flow swap interest		1,351			1,499			148			9.9	%		575			1,126			551			48.9	%
Capitalized interest		(600	)		(654	)		(54	)		(8.3	%)		(551	)		(827	)		(276	)		(33.4	%)
Other interest		140			166			26			15.7	%		111			150			39			26.0	%
Total interest expense, other, net	$	13,016		$	12,361		$	(655	)		(5.3	%)	$	12,764		$	12,205		$	(559	)		(4.6	%)

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Interest expense, other, net increased approximately ~~$0.7~~$0.6 million during the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, primarily due to higher stated/coupon interest, ~~related to~~ additional mortgage notes payable balances and lower levels of interest capitalized in conjunction with construction projects, offset partially by a decrease in cash flow swap interest payments. Interest expense, other, net ~~decreased~~increased approximately ~~$1.1~~$1.7 million during the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, primarily due to ~~a decrease in cash flow swap~~higher stated/coupon interest ~~payments~~related to approximately $0.7 million of double-carry interest for the period of which the 7.0% Notes and ~~higher~~the 6.125% Notes were both outstanding, additional mortgage notes payable balances and lower levels of interest capitalized in conjunction with construction projects, offset partially by ~~higher stated/coupon~~a decrease in cash flow swap interest payments.

Other income, net was flat during the three months ended June 30, 2017. Other expense, net increased approximately $14.6 million during the six months ended June 30, 2017, due to a charge of approximately $14.6 million related to ~~additional mortgage notes payable.~~the extinguishment of the 7.0% Notes in the six months ended June 30, 2017.

The overall effective tax rate from continuing operations was 39.3% ~~for both the three~~ and ~~nine months ended September 30, 2016,~~ ~~and was 40.0% and 39.5%~~39.8% for the three and ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2015,~~2017, respectively,. and was 39.6% and 39.3% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, respectively. Our effective tax rate varies from year to year based on the distribution of taxable income between states in which we operate and other tax adjustments. We expect the effective tax rate in future periods to fall within a range of 38.0% to 40.0% before the impact, if any, of changes in valuation allowances related to deferred income tax assets or ~~unusual~~ discrete tax adjustments.

	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,						Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2016			2015			2016			2015			2017			2016			2017			2016
	(In thousands)												(In thousands)
Income (loss) from operations	$	(350	)	$	(383	)	$	(539	)	$	(1,029	)	$	(162	)	$	(135	)	$	(441	)	$	(327	)
Lease exit accrual adjustments and charges		(1,063	)		(616	)		(974	)		(1,171	)		(139	)		(227	)		(727	)		227
Pre-tax income (loss)	$	(1,413	)	$	(999	)	$	(1,513	)	$	(2,200	)	$	(301	)	$	(362	)	$	(1,168	)	$	(100	)
Total revenues	$	-		$	-		$	-		$	42		$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-

We require cash to fund debt service, operating lease obligations, working capital requirements, facility improvements and other capital improvements, and dividends on our common stock and to finance acquisitions and otherwise invest in our business. We rely on cash flows from operations, borrowings under our revolving credit and floor plan borrowing arrangements, real estate mortgage financing, asset sales and offerings of debt and equity securities to meet these requirements. We closely monitor our available liquidity and projected future operating results in order to remain in compliance with restrictive covenants under the ~~2014~~2016 Credit Facilities and other debt obligations and lease arrangements. However, our liquidity could be negatively affected if we fail to comply with the financial covenants in our existing debt or lease arrangements. There are no restrictions under our borrowing arrangements on retained earnings or net income. Cash flows provided by our dealerships are derived from various sources. The primary sources include

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

individual consumers, automobile manufacturers, automobile manufacturers’ captive finance subsidiaries and finance companies. Disruptions in these cash flows could have a material adverse impact on our operations and overall liquidity.

Because the majority of our consolidated assets are held by our dealership subsidiaries, the majority of our cash flows from operations are generated by these subsidiaries. As a result, our cash flows and our ability to service our obligations depend to a substantial degree on the cash generated from the operations of these dealership subsidiaries.

~~MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS~~

We had the following liquidity resources available as of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017 and December 31, ~~2015:~~2016:

	September 30, 2016		December 31, 2015		June 30, 2017		December 31, 2016
	(In thousands)				(In thousands)
Cash and cash equivalents	$	2,941	$	3,625	$	4,380	$	3,108
Availability under our revolving credit facility		171,595		181,058
Availability under our used vehicle floor plan facilities		50,159		21,192
Availability under the 2016 Revolving Credit Facility						194,087		207,053
Availability under our new and used vehicle floor plan facilities						23,121		46,423
Floor plan deposit balance		10,000		74,000		23,000		10,000
Total available liquidity resources	$	234,695	$	279,875	$	244,588	$	266,584

We participate in a program with two of our manufacturer-affiliated finance companies (the floor plan deposit balance in the table above) wherein we maintain a deposit balance with the lender that earns interest based on the agreed upon rate. This deposit balance is not designated as a pre-payment of notes payable – floor plan, nor is it our intent to use this amount to offset principal amounts owed under notes payable – floor plan in the future, although we have the right and ability to do so. The deposit balance of ~~$10.0~~$23.0 million and ~~$74.0~~$10.0 million as of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017 and December 31, ~~2015,~~2016, respectively, is classified in other current assets in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets.

We finance our new and certain of our used vehicle inventory through standardized floor plan facilities with manufacturer captive finance companies and a syndicate of manufacturer-affiliated finance companies and commercial banks. These floor plan facilities are due on demand and bear interest at variable rates based on either LIBOR or the prime rate. The weighted average interest rate for our combined new and used vehicle floor plan facilities was ~~1.84%~~2.37% and ~~1.78%~~2.29% in the three and ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, respectively, and ~~1.63%~~1.80% and ~~1.62%~~1.74% in the three and ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2015,~~2016, respectively.

We receive floor plan assistance from certain manufacturers. Floor plan assistance received is capitalized in inventory and charged against cost of sales when the associated inventory is sold. We received approximately ~~$11.6~~$10.7 million and ~~$32.6~~$21.7 million in floor plan assistance in the three and ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, respectively, and ~~$11.3~~approximately $10.9 million and ~~$30.7~~$21.0 million in floor plan assistance in the three and ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2015,~~2016, respectively. We recognized manufacturer floor plan assistance in cost of sales for continuing operations of approximately ~~$11.3~~$11.0 million and ~~$32.2~~$20.9 million in the three and ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, respectively, and ~~$10.5~~approximately $10.3 million and ~~$30.1~~$20.8 million in the three and ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2015,~~2016, respectively. Interest payments under each of our floor plan facilities are due monthly and we are not required to make principal repayments prior to the sale of the vehicles.

On March 10, 2017, we issued $250.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 6.125% Notes which mature on March 15, 2027. The 6.125% Notes were issued at a price of 100.0% of the principal amount thereof. We used the net proceeds from the issuance of the 6.125% Notes to repurchase all of the outstanding 7.0% Notes during the six months ended June 30, 2017. Remaining proceeds from the issuance of the 6.125% Notes will be used for general corporate purposes. The 6.125% Notes are our unsecured senior subordinated obligations and are guaranteed by our domestic operating subsidiaries. Interest on the 6.125% Notes is payable semi-annually in arrears on March 15 and September 15 of each year. See Note 6, “Long-Term Debt,” to the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements for discussion of our long-term debt and credit facilities and compliance with debt covenants.

~~See Note 2, “Business Acquisitions and Dispositions,” to the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements.~~

Our capital expenditures include the purchase of land and buildings, construction of new dealerships, EchoPark® stores and collision repair centers, building improvements and equipment purchased for use in our franchised dealerships and EchoPark® stores. We selectively construct new or improve existing dealership facilities to maintain compliance with manufacturers’ image requirements. We typically finance these projects through new mortgages or, alternatively, through our credit facilities. We also fund these projects through cash flows from operations.

~~Capital expenditures in the~~ ~~three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 were approximately $46.1 million and $155.1 million, respectively. Of this amount, approximately $29.2~~ ~~million and $89.3 million~~ ~~were related to facility construction projects in the~~ ~~three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively. Real estate acquisitions accounted for approximately $9.1 million and $43.6 million in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively.~~ ~~Fixed assets utilized in our~~

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Capital expenditures in the six months ended June 30, 2017 were approximately $121.2 million. Of this amount, $62.4 million was related to facility construction projects and $37.2 million was related to real estate acquisitions, while fixed assets utilized in our dealership operations accounted for the remaining ~~$7.8 million and $22.2~~$21.6 million of ~~the~~ capital ~~expenditures in the~~ ~~three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively.~~expenditures.

Of the capital expenditures in the ~~three~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, approximately ~~$23.2~~$32.4 million was funded through mortgage financing and approximately ~~$22.9 million was funded through cash from operations and use of our credit facilities. Of the capital expenditures in the~~ ~~nine months ended September 30, 2016, approximately $99.5 million was funded through mortgage financing and approximately $55.6~~$88.8 million was funded through cash from operations and use of our credit facilities. As of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, commitments for ~~facilities~~facility construction projects totaled approximately ~~$53.7~~$39.5 million. We expect investments related to capital expenditures to be partly dependent upon our overall liquidity position and the availability of mortgage financing to fund significant capital projects.

Our Board of Directors has authorized us to repurchase shares of our Class A common stock. Historically, we have used our share repurchase authorization to offset dilution caused by the exercise of stock options or the vesting of equity compensation awards and to maintain our desired capital structure. During the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, our Board of Directors authorized an additional $100.0 million to repurchase shares of our Class A common stock. During the three and ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, 2017, ~~2016,~~ we repurchased approximately ~~0.6~~1.2 million and ~~5.4~~1.4 million shares of our Class A common stock, respectively, for approximately ~~$10.0~~$22.0 million and ~~$97.5~~$25.9 million, respectively, in open-market transactions at prevailing market prices ~~including two separate private block trades,~~ and in connection with tax withholdings on the vesting of equity compensation awards. As of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, our total remaining repurchase authorization was approximately ~~$47.5~~$119.1 million. Under the ~~2014~~2016 Credit Facilities, share repurchases are permitted to the extent that no event of default exists.

Our share repurchase activity is subject to the business judgment of our Board of Directors and management, taking into consideration our historical and projected results of operations, financial condition, cash flows, capital requirements, covenant compliance and economic and other factors considered relevant. These factors are considered each quarter and will be scrutinized as our Board of Directors and management determine our share repurchase policy in the future.

During the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, our Board of Directors approved a cash dividend of $0.05 per share on all outstanding shares of Class A and Class B common stock as of June 15, 2017 to be paid on July 14, 2017. Subsequent to June 30, 2017, our Board of Directors approved a cash dividend of $0.05 per share on all outstanding shares of Class A and Class B common stock as of September 15, ~~2016~~2017 to be paid on October 14, 2016. Subsequent to September 30, 2016, our Board of Directors approved a cash dividend of $0.05 per share on all outstanding shares of Class A and Class B common stock as of December 15, 2016 to be paid on January 13, 2017. Under the ~~2014~~2016 Credit Facilities, dividends are permitted to the extent that no event of default exists and we are in compliance with the financial covenants contained therein. The indentures governing our outstanding 5.0% Notes and ~~7.0%~~6.125% Notes also contain restrictions on our ability to pay dividends. The payment of any future dividend is subject to the business judgment of our Board of Directors, taking into consideration our historical and projected results of operations, financial condition, cash flows, capital requirements, covenant compliance, share repurchases, current economic environment and other factors considered relevant. These factors are considered each quarter and will be scrutinized as our Board of Directors determines our future dividend policy. There is no guarantee that additional dividends will be declared and paid at any time in the future. See Note 6, “Long-Term Debt,” to the consolidated financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016 for a description of restrictions on the payment of dividends.

Net cash provided by operating activities in the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017 was approximately $241.5 million. This provision of cash was comprised primarily of cash inflows related to operating profits and decreases in receivables, inventories and other assets, offset partially by a decrease in notes payable – floor plan – trade. ~~In the nine months ended September 30, 2015, net cash provided by operating activities was approximately $131.7~~$92.9 million. This provision of cash was comprised primarily of cash inflows related to operating profits and a decrease in receivables, offset partially by increases in inventories and ~~an increase~~other assets and a decrease in notes payable – floor plan – ~~trade,~~trade. In the six months ended June 30, 2016, net cash provided by operating activities was approximately $106.7 million. This provision of cash was comprised primarily of cash inflows related to operating profits and decreases in receivables and other assets, offset partially by ~~decreases~~a decrease in ~~trade accounts~~notes payable ~~other liabilities and an increase in inventories.~~– floor plan – trade.

Net cash used in investing activities in the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017 was approximately ~~$169.9~~$120.9 million. This use of cash was comprised primarily ~~comprised~~ of purchases of land, property and equipment. Net cash used in investing activities in the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2015~~2016 was approximately ~~$124.6~~$108.1 million. This use of cash was comprised primarily ~~comprised~~ of purchases of land, property and equipment.

41Net cash provided by financing activities in the six months ended June 30, 2017 was approximately $29.3 million. This provision of cash was comprised primarily of proceeds from issuance of long-term debt (including mortgages), offset partially by repurchases of debt securities and purchases of treasury stock. Net cash provided by financing activities in the six months ended June

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

~~Net cash used in financing activities in the nine months ended September~~ 30, 2016 was approximately ~~$72.3~~$0.2 million. This ~~use~~provision of cash was comprised primarily of ~~purchases of treasury stock, payments~~cash inflows related to borrowing on ~~notes payable~~ ~~– floor plan – non-trade,~~ ~~payments and repurchases on long-term debt,~~ ~~offset partially by proceeds from issuance of mortgage-related long-term debt~~.~~Net cash used in financing activities in the nine months ended September 30, 2015 was approximately $8.8 million. This use of cash was comprised primarily of purchases of treasury stock, a decrease in~~ notes payable – floor plan – non-trade and ~~payments on long-term debt, offset partially by~~ proceeds from issuance of mortgage-related long-term ~~debt.~~debt, offset partially by purchases of treasury stock.

We arrange our inventory floor plan financing through both manufacturer captive finance companies and a syndicate of manufacturer-affiliated finance companies and commercial banks. Our floor plan financed with manufacturer captives is recorded as trade floor plan liabilities (with the resulting change being reflected as operating cash flows). Our dealerships that obtain floor plan financing from a syndicate of manufacturer-affiliated finance companies and commercial banks record their obligation as non-trade floor plan liabilities (with the resulting change being reflected as financing cash flows). Due to the presentation differences for changes in trade floor plan and non-trade floor plan in the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows, decisions made by us to move dealership floor plan financing arrangements from one finance source to another may cause significant variations in operating and financing cash flows without affecting our overall liquidity, working capital or cash flow. Net cash used in combined trade and non-trade floor plan financing was approximately ~~$167.3~~$44.6 million and $76.4 million in the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, 2017 and 2016, ~~and net cash provided by combined trade and non-trade floor plan financing was approximately $21.2 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2015~~.respectively. Accordingly, if all changes in floor plan notes payable were classified as an operating activity, the result would have been net cash provided by operating activities of approximately ~~$204.8~~$96.6 million and ~~$102.5~~$136.6 million in the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015,~~2016, respectively.

In connection with the operation and disposition of dealership franchises, we have entered into various guarantees and indemnification obligations. See Note 8, “Contingencies,” to the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements. See also “Item 7:7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and Note 12, “Commitments and Contingencies,” to the consolidated financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2015.~~2016.

We believe our best sources of liquidity for operations and debt service remain cash flows generated from operations combined with the availability of borrowings under our floor plan facilities (or any replacements thereof) and our ~~2014~~2016 Credit Facilities (or any replacements thereof), real estate mortgage financing, selected dealership and other asset sales and our ability to raise funds in the capital markets through offerings of debt or equity securities. Because the majority of our consolidated assets are held by our dealership subsidiaries, the majority of our cash flows from operations are generated by these subsidiaries. As a result, our cash flows and our ability to service our obligations depend to a substantial degree on the results of operations of these subsidiaries and their ability to provide us with cash.

See “Item 7:7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2015.~~2016.

Our operations are subject to seasonal variations. The first quarter normally contributes less operating profit than the second, third and fourth quarters. Weather conditions, the timing of manufacturer incentive programs and model changeovers cause seasonality and may adversely affect vehicle demand and, consequently, our profitability. Comparatively, parts and service demand remains stable throughout the year.

Our variable rate floor plan facilities, ~~2014~~2016 Revolving Credit Facility and other variable rate notes expose us to risks caused by fluctuations in the applicable interest rates. The total outstanding balance of such variable instruments, after considering the effect of our interest rate swaps (see below), was approximately ~~$855.1 million~~$1.4 billion at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016.~~2017. A change of 100 basis points in the underlying interest rate would have caused a change in interest expense of approximately ~~$9.2~~$7.1 million in the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016.~~2017. Of the total change in interest expense, approximately ~~$7.9~~$6.2 million would have resulted from the floor plan facilities.

In addition to our variable rate debt, certain of our dealership lease facilities have monthly lease payments that fluctuate based on LIBOR interest rates. An increase in interest rates of 100 basis points would not have had a significant impact on rent expense in the ~~three and nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017 due to the leases containing LIBOR floors which were above the LIBOR rate during the ~~three and nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016.~~2017.

We also have interest rate cash flow swap agreements to effectively convert a portion of our LIBOR-based variable rate debt to a fixed rate. Under the terms of these cash flow swaps, interest rates reset monthly. The fair value of these swap positions at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017 was a net liability of approximately ~~$13.1~~$1.3 million, with ~~$5.6~~$1.8 million included in other accrued liabilities and ~~$7.5~~$1.9 million included in other long-term liabilities in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets, offset partially by an asset of approximately $2.4 million included in other assets in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. The fair value of these swap positions at December 31, 2016 was a net liability of approximately $3.7 million, with $4.1 million included in other accrued liabilities and $2.4 million included in other long-term liabilities in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets, offset partially by an asset of approximately $2.8 million included in other current assets and other assets in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets.

Under the terms of these cash flow swaps, we will receive and pay interest based on the following:

Notional Amount	Notional Amount		Pay Rate		Receive Rate (1)	Maturing Date	Notional Amount		Pay Rate		Receive Rate (1)	Maturing Date
(In millions)	(In millions)						(In millions)
$	2.3			7.100%	one-month LIBOR + 1.50%	July 10, 2017	2.2			7.100%	one-month LIBOR + 1.50%	July 10, 2017
$	7.5			4.655%	one-month LIBOR	December 10, 2017	7.0			4.655%	one-month LIBOR	December 10, 2017
$	6.7	(2)		6.860%	one-month LIBOR + 1.25%	August 1, 2017	6.4	(2)		6.860%	one-month LIBOR + 1.25%	August 1, 2017
$	6.0	(2)		6.410%	one-month LIBOR + 1.25%	September 12, 2017	5.9	(2)		6.410%	one-month LIBOR + 1.25%	September 12, 2017
$	100.0			2.065%	one-month LIBOR	June 30, 2017	50.0			1.320%	one-month LIBOR	July 1, 2017
$	100.0			2.015%	one-month LIBOR	June 30, 2017	250.0	(3)		1.887%	one-month LIBOR	June 30, 2018
$	50.0			1.320%	one-month LIBOR	July 1, 2017	25.0			2.080%	one-month LIBOR	July 1, 2017
$	250.0	(3)		1.887%	one-month LIBOR	June 30, 2018	100.0			1.560%	one-month LIBOR	July 1, 2017
$	25.0			2.080%	one-month LIBOR	July 1, 2017	125.0			1.303%	one-month LIBOR	July 1, 2017
$	100.0			1.560%	one-month LIBOR	July 1, 2017	125.0	(4)		1.900%	one-month LIBOR	July 1, 2018
$	125.0			1.303%	one-month LIBOR	July 1, 2017	50.0	(5)		2.320%	one-month LIBOR	July 1, 2019
$	125.0	(4)		1.900%	one-month LIBOR	July 1, 2018	200.0	(5)		2.313%	one-month LIBOR	July 1, 2019
$	50.0	(5)		2.320%	one-month LIBOR	July 1, 2019	100.0	(6)		1.384%	one-month LIBOR	July 1, 2020
$	200.0	(5)		2.313%	one-month LIBOR	July 1, 2019	125.0	(5)		1.158%	one-month LIBOR	July 1, 2019
$	100.0	(6)		1.384%	one-month LIBOR	July 1, 2020	150.0	(6)		1.310%	one-month LIBOR	July 1, 2020
$	125.0	(5)		1.158%	one-month LIBOR	July 1, 2019	125.0	(4)		1.020%	one-month LIBOR	July 1, 2018
$	150.0	(6)		1.310%	one-month LIBOR	July 1, 2020
$	125.0	(4)		1.020%	one-month LIBOR	July 1, 2018

We purchase certain of our new vehicle and parts inventories from foreign manufacturers. Although we purchase our inventories in U.S. dollars, our business is subject to foreign exchange rate risk that may influence automobile manufacturers’ ability to provide their products at competitive prices in the United States. To the extent that we cannot recapture this volatility in prices charged to customers or if this volatility negatively impacts consumer demand for our products, this volatility could adversely affect our future operating results.

Disclosure Controls and Procedures – Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), we evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and Rule 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) as of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016.~~2017. Based upon that evaluation, our CEO and CFO concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016.~~2017.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting – There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting during the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting can provide only reasonable assurance that the objectives of the control system are met and may not prevent or detect misstatements. In addition, any evaluation of the effectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting in future periods is subject to risk that those internal controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

We are involved, and expect to continue to be involved, in ~~numerous~~various legal and administrative proceedings arising out of the conduct of our business, including regulatory investigations and private civil actions brought by plaintiffs purporting to represent a potential class or for which a class has been certified. Although we vigorously defend ourselves in all legal and administrative proceedings, the outcomes of pending and future proceedings arising out of the conduct of our business, including litigation with customers, ~~employment related~~employment-related lawsuits, contractual disputes, class actions, purported class actions and actions brought by governmental authorities, cannot be predicted with certainty. An unfavorable resolution of one or more of these matters could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows or prospects.

Included in other accrued liabilities and other long-term liabilities at June 30, 2017 was approximately $2.5 million and $0.2 million, respectively, in reserves that we were holding for pending proceedings. Except as reflected in such reserves, we are currently unable to estimate a range of reasonably possible loss, or a range of reasonably possible loss in excess of the amount accrued, for pending proceedings.

In addition to the information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the risk factors discussed in “Item ~~1A:~~1A. Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2015,~~2016, which could materially affect our business, financial condition or future results.

The following table sets forth information about the shares of Class A common stock we repurchased during the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016:~~2017:

See “Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” for additional discussion of restrictions on share repurchases and payment of dividends.

On and effective as of July 27, 2017, our Board of Directors amended and restated our Amended and Restated Bylaws to reflect the restatement of Section 3.05 therein to provide that directors may be removed from office, with or without cause, by a vote of our stockholders holding shares having a majority of the votes then entitled to be voted at an election of directors and, if any directors are so removed, new directors may be elected at the same meeting. Formerly, this section provided that a director could only be removed during his term for cause.

The foregoing description is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of our Amended and Restated Bylaws, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit 3.5 and incorporated herein by reference.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Large accelerated filer	☒	Accelerated filer	☐

Non-accelerated filer	☐ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company	☐
		Emerging growth company	☐

		Page

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION			1

Item 1.	Financial Statements (unaudited)		1

	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income		1

	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income		2

	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets		3

	Condensed Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity		4

	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows		5

	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements		6

Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		1819

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		4344

Item 4.	Controls and Procedures		4546

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION			4647

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings		4647

Item 1A.	Risk Factors		4748

Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds		4849

Item 5.	Other Information		50

Item 6.	Exhibits		4951

~~Signatures~~SIGNATURES			5052

~~Exhibit Index~~EXHIBIT INDEX			5153

	(In thousands)
Balance at December 31, 2015	$	14,527
Interest expense, net of adjustments (1)		1,109
Payments (2)		(4,725	)
Balance at September 30, 2016	$	10,911

	(In thousands)
Balance at December 31, 2016	$	9,790
Lease exit expense (1)		1,827
Payments (2)		(1,877	)
Other (3)		(1,377	)
Balance at June 30, 2017	$	8,363

	Redemption Price
Beginning on March 15, 2022		103.063	%
Beginning on March 15, 2023		102.042	%
Beginning on March 15, 2024		101.021	%
Beginning on March 15, 2025 and thereafter		100.000	%

	Total Number of Shares Purchased		Average Price Paid per Share		Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs (1)		Approximate Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
	(In thousands, except per share data)

July 2016		-	$	-		-	$	57,499
August 2016		579	$	17.23		579	$	47,518
September 2016		-	$	-		-	$	47,518
Total		579				579

	(In thousands)
January 2016 authorization	$	100,000
Total active program repurchases prior to September 30, 2016		(52,482	)
Current remaining availability as of September 30, 2016	$	47,518

Exhibit No.		Description

3.1		Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Sonic Automotive, Inc., dated August 7, 1997 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2017 (File No. 001-13395)).

3.2		Certificate of Designation, Preferences and Rights of Class A Convertible Preferred Stock, dated March 20, 1998 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2017 (File No. 001-13395)).

3.3		Certificate of Amendment to the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Sonic Automotive, Inc., dated June 16, 1999 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2017 (File No. 001-13395)).

3.4		Certificate of Amendment to the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Sonic Automotive, Inc., dated April 18, 2017 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.4 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2017 (File No. 001-13395)).

3.5*		Amended and Restated Bylaws of Sonic Automotive, Inc., dated July 27, 2017.

4.1		Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of March 10, 2017, by and among Sonic Automotive, Inc., the guarantors set forth on the signature pages thereto and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, as representative of the several initial purchasers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 14, 2017 (File No. 001-13395)).

4.2		Indenture, dated as of March 10, 2017, by and among Sonic Automotive, Inc., the guarantors named therein and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 14, 2017 (File No. 001-13395)).

4.3		Form of 6.125% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2027 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 14, 2017 (File No. 001-13395)).

10.1		Sonic Automotive, Inc. 2012 Formula Restricted Stock and Deferral Plan for Non-Employee Directors, amended and restated effective as of April 18, 2017 (incorporated by reference to Appendix B to the Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed March 6, 2017 (File No. 001-13395)). (1)

10.2		Sonic Automotive, Inc. 2012 Formula Restricted Stock and Deferral Plan for Non-Employee Directors Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2017 (File No. 001-13395)). (1)

10.3		Sonic Automotive, Inc. 2012 Formula Restricted Stock and Deferral Plan for Non-Employee Directors Form of Deferred Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2017 (File No. 001-13395)). (1)

31.1*		Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2*		Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1**		Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2**		Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

101.INS*		XBRL Instance Document.

101.SCH*		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.

101.CAL*		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.

101.DEF*		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.

101.LAB*		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.

101.PRE*		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.

	SONIC AUTOMOTIVE, INC.

Date: ~~November 1, 2016~~July 28, 2017	By:	/s/ B. SCOTT SMITH
		B. Scott Smith
		Chief Executive Officer and President

Date: ~~November 1, 2016~~July 28, 2017	By:	/s/ HEATH R. BYRD
		Heath R. Byrd
		Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer