(Exact ~~name~~Name of ~~registrant~~Registrant as ~~specified~~Specified in its ~~charter)~~Charter)

Indicate by check mark whether the ~~registrant:~~registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate ~~website,~~Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, ~~or a~~ smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated ~~filer”~~filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and ~~“smaller reporting~~“emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. ~~(Check one):~~

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒

As of ~~November 3, 2016, there were 22,229,646~~May 8, 2017, the registrant had 22,251,472 shares of ~~Common Stock,~~common stock, $0.01 par value per share, outstanding.

	September 30, 2016			December 31, 2015			March 31, 2017			December 31, 2016
ASSETS
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	39,963		$	69,177		$	45,170		$	46,898
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $0.6 million and $0.4 million, respectively		4,519			3,033
Accounts receivable, net								5,939			6,697
Income taxes receivable		2,353			2,078			193			2,340
Prepaid expenses		8,972			6,803			9,567			9,761
Inventories		2,583			2,439			3,151			2,605
Other		951			1,074			1,517			1,346
Total current assets		59,341			84,604			65,537			69,647

Property and equipment, net		136,419			114,309			140,643			137,581

Other assets
Goodwill		105,655			96,288			105,655			105,655
Customer relationships, net		72,530			57,456			69,807			71,168
Other intangible assets, net		28,014			23,368			26,931			27,435
Deferred income taxes								1,678			—
Other		6,369			2,759			8,595			7,592
Total other assets		212,568			179,871			212,666			211,850
Total assets	$	408,328		$	378,784		$	418,846		$	419,078

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities
Current portion of long-term debt, net	$	14,545		$	8,552
Current portion of long-term debt							$	15,055		$	15,752
Accounts payable		10,795			8,237			8,985			11,739
Accrued taxes, other than income taxes		894			831			2,744			3,024
Accrued payroll and related		3,435			3,494			3,647			3,478
Deposits		272			128
Other accrued expenses		3,729			3,476			4,021			3,846
Total current liabilities		33,670			24,718			34,452			37,839

Long-term debt, net		167,019			137,546			163,724			167,690
Deferred taxes		5,136			4,471
Deferred income taxes								—			38
Other long-term obligations		4,419			1,564			4,318			4,085
Total liabilities		210,244			168,299			202,494			209,652
Commitments and contingencies (Note 12)
Commitments and contingencies (Note 10)

Shareholders' equity
Common stock, $.01 par value; authorized 100,000 shares; 22,229 and 21,868 common shares issued and outstanding, respectively		222			353
Common stock, $.01 par value; authorized 100,000 shares; 22,251 and 22,232 common shares issued and outstanding, respectively								223			223
Additional paid-in capital		288,775			283,857			291,741			290,157
Accumulated deficit		(90,913	)		(73,725	)		(75,612	)		(80,954	)
Total shareholders' equity		198,084			210,485			216,352			209,426
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity	$	408,328		$	378,784		$	418,846		$	419,078

The accompanying condensed notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended						Three Months Ended
	September 30, 2016			September 30, 2015			September 30, 2016			September 30, 2015			March 31, 2017			March 31, 2016
Revenues
Gaming	$	89,157		$	52,336		$	255,966		$	74,746		$	91,522		$	78,472
Food and beverage		14,404			9,230			41,846			12,320			15,650			13,341
Rooms		2,349			2,141			5,849			5,010			1,578			1,555
Other operating		3,298			1,873			8,589			3,061			3,385			2,212
Gross revenues		109,208			65,580			312,250			95,137			112,135			95,580
Less: Promotional allowances		(4,982	)		(3,068	)		(14,432	)		(4,530	)		(5,489	)		(4,546	)
Net revenues		104,226			62,512			297,818			90,607			106,646			91,034

Expenses
Gaming		65,261			35,661			184,293			48,284			62,887			55,491
Food and beverage		8,646			6,824			25,245			9,143			9,606			8,127
Rooms		355			270			920			643			309			260
Other operating		1,247			813			3,193			1,555			3,200			779
Selling, general and administrative		17,816			12,134			50,272			22,542			18,502			16,234
Merger expenses		139			9,325			614			10,591			—			41
(Gain) loss on disposal of property and equipment		(344	)		8			(344	)		6
Gain on sale of cost method investment		—			—			—			(750	)
Impairments and other losses		—			—			—			682
Preopening expenses		801			129			1,893			129			272			573
Depreciation and amortization		7,223			5,100			19,862			6,859			6,552			5,792
Total expenses		101,144			70,264			285,948			99,684			101,328			87,297
Income (loss) from operations		3,082			(7,752	)		11,870			(9,077	)
Income from operations														5,318			3,737

Non-operating income (expense)
Interest expense, net		(1,689	)		(980	)		(4,786	)		(1,423	)		(1,683	)		(1,457	)
Loss on extinguishment of debt		—			(1,174	)		—			(1,174	)
Other, net		—			50			18			86			—			18
Total non-operating expense, net		(1,689	)		(2,104	)		(4,768	)		(2,511	)		(1,683	)		(1,439	)
Income (loss) before income tax benefit (provision)		1,393			(9,856	)		7,102			(11,588	)
Income before income tax benefit (provision)														3,635			2,298
Income tax benefit (provision)		(91	)		12,874			(761	)		12,702			1,707			(59	)
Net income		1,302			3,018			6,341			1,114		$	5,342		$	2,239
Other comprehensive income		—			20			—			22
Comprehensive income	$	1,302		$	3,038		$	6,341		$	1,136

Weighted-average common shares outstanding
Basic		22,221			18,821			22,103			15,240			22,238			21,960
Dilutive impact of stock options		564			241			319			213
Dilutive impact of stock options and restricted stock units														529			296
Diluted		22,785			19,062			22,422			15,453			22,767			22,256
Net income per share
Basic	$	0.06		$	0.16		$	0.29		$	0.07		$	0.24		$	0.10
Diluted	$	0.06		$	0.16		$	0.28		$	0.07		$	0.23		$	0.10

The accompanying condensed notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

	Nine Months Ended						Three Months Ended
	September 30, 2016			September 30, 2015			March 31, 2017			March 31, 2016
Cash flows from operating activities
Net income	$	6,341		$	1,114		$	5,342		$	2,239
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		19,862			6,859			6,552			5,792
Amortization of debt issuance costs and accretion of debt discount		538			363
Accretion and amortization of discounts and premiums on short-term investments		—			240
Amortization of debt issuance costs								191			153
Share-based compensation		2,509			410			1,427			405
(Gain) loss on disposal of property and equipment		(344	)		6
Loss on extinguishment of debt		—			1,174
Impairments and other losses		—			357
Deferred income taxes		776			(12,728	)		(1,716	)		59
Other operating activities								—			(18	)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions:
Accounts receivable		(973	)		1,194			758			(1,437	)
Income taxes receivable								2,146			—
Prepaid expenses		(2,916	)		1,272			181			642
Income taxes receivable		—			(144	)
Other current assets		(90	)		231
Deposits		—			150
Inventories and other current assets								(720	)		(31	)
Other assets								(1,003	)		(23	)
Accounts payable and other accrued expenses								(2,410	)		2,645
Accrued taxes, other than income taxes		(212	)		(180	)		(280	)		13
Accounts payable and other accrued expenses		2,602			(1,076	)
Other		(289	)		—
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		27,804			(758	)
Other liabilities								233			348
Net cash provided by operating activities								10,701			10,787
Cash flows from investing activities
Purchase of property and equipment								(5,680	)		(8,506	)
Acquisition of businesses, net of cash acquired		(41,273	)		25,539			—			(15,930	)
Purchase of property and equipment		(24,208	)		(2,882	)
Purchase of short-term investments		—			(25,137	)
Proceeds from maturities of short-term investments		—			71,357
Proceeds from disposal of property and equipment		400			4,409
Issuance of notes receivable		(107	)		—			—			(107	)
Other		(2,083	)		(1,399	)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		(67,271	)		71,887
Other investing activities								(75	)		(2,059	)
Net cash used in investing activities								(5,755	)		(26,602	)
Cash flows from financing activities
Repayments of Revolving Credit Facility								(3,000	)		(40,000	)
Borrowings on Revolving Credit Facility								—			15,000
Repayments of Term Loans		(5,500	)		(202,546	)		(3,000	)		(1,500	)
Proceeds from Term Loans		40,000			145,336			—			40,000
Repayments of notes payable		(1,539	)		—			(696	)		(882	)
Dividends paid		(23,529	)		—
Proceeds from issuance of common stock		1,778			35			158			890
Payments for debt issuance costs		(500	)		(2,723	)		—			(416	)
Principal payments under capital leases		(457	)		—			(136	)		—
Warrant repurchase		—			(3,435	)
Other		—			(56	)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		10,253			(63,389	)		(6,674	)		13,092
Cash and cash equivalents
Net increase (decrease) for the period		(29,214	)		7,740
Net decrease for the period								(1,728	)		(2,723	)
Balance, beginning of period		69,177			35,416			46,898			69,177
Balance, end of period	$	39,963		$	43,156		$	45,170		$	66,454
Supplemental cash flow disclosures
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest	$	4,248		$	1,160		$	1,483		$	1,305
Non-cash investing and financing activities
Notes payable issued for property and equipment	$	345		$	—		$	—		$	345
Equipment acquired under capital lease obligations		2,597			—
Assets acquired under capital lease obligations								1,978			—
Common stock issued in connection with acquisition		500			75,304			—			500

The accompanying condensed notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Golden Entertainment, Inc. ~~(formerly named Lakes Entertainment, Inc.)~~ and its wholly owned subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”) is a diversified group of gaming companies that focus on distributed gaming (including tavern gaming) and casino and resort operations. ~~On July 31, 2015,~~The Company’s common stock is traded on the ~~Company acquired Sartini Gaming, Inc. (“Sartini Gaming”) through the merger of a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company with~~NASDAQ Global Market, and into Sartini Gaming, with Sartini Gaming surviving as a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company (the “Merger”). The results of operations of Sartini Gaming and its subsidiaries have been included in the Company’s ~~results subsequent to that date. In connection with the Merger, the Company’s name was changed to Golden Entertainment, Inc. See Note 2,~~ ~~Merger and Acquisitions, for information regarding the Merger.~~ticker symbol is “GDEN.”

The Company conducts its business through two reportable operating segments: Distributed Gaming and Casinos. The Company’s Distributed Gaming segment involves the installation, maintenance and operation of gaming and amusement devices in certain strategic, high-traffic, non-casino locations (such as grocery stores, convenience stores, restaurants, bars, taverns, saloons and liquor stores) in Nevada and Montana, and the operation of traditional, branded taverns targeting local patrons, primarily in the greater Las Vegas, Nevada metropolitan area. The Company’s Casinos segment consists of the Rocky Gap Casino Resort in Flintstone, Maryland (“Rocky Gap”) and three casinos in Pahrump, Nevada: Pahrump Nugget Hotel Casino (“Pahrump Nugget”), Gold Town Casino and Lakeside Casino & RV Park.

On January 29, 2016, the Company completed the acquisition of approximately 1,100 gaming devices from a distributed gaming operator in Montana, as well as certain other non-gaming assets and the right to operate within certain locations (the “Initial Montana Acquisition”). Additionally, on April 22, 2016, the Company completed the acquisition of approximately 1,800 gaming devices from a second distributed gaming operator in Montana, as well as amusement devices and other non-gaming assets and the right to operate within certain locations (the “Second Montana Acquisition” and, together with the Initial Montana Acquisition, the “Montana Acquisitions”). See Note 2, ~~Merger and Acquisitions, for information regarding the Montana Acquisitions.~~

On October 28, 2015, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a change in the Company’s fiscal year from a 52- or 53-week fiscal year ending on the Sunday closest to December 31 of each year to a calendar year ending on December 31, effective as of the beginning of the third quarter of 2015. As a result of this change, the Company’s fiscal quarters for 2015 ended on March 29, 2015, June 28, 2015, September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2015. From and after January 1, 2016, the Company’s fiscal quarters end on March 31, June 30, September 30 and December 31.

The unaudited consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) applicable to interim financial information. Accordingly, certain information normally included in the annual financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) has been condensed and/or omitted. For further information, please refer to the audited consolidated financial statements of the Company for the year ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016 and the notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K previously filed with the SEC. In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments, which include only normal recurring adjustments, necessary to present fairly the Company’s results for the periods presented. Results for interim periods should not be considered indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries. All material intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. ~~In addition to recasting segment information for the prior year period to reflect the new segment structure adopted by the Company in connection with the Merger, certain other~~Certain minor reclassifications have been made to the prior year period amounts to conform to the current presentation.

For all periods, basic net income per share is calculated by dividing net income by the weighted-average common shares outstanding. Diluted net income per share in profitable periods reflects the effect of all potentially dilutive common shares outstanding by dividing net income by the weighted-average of all common and potentially dilutive shares outstanding. In the event of a net loss, diluted shares are not considered because of the anti-diluted effect.

Board (“FASB”), in the form of Accounting Standards Updates (“ASUs”) to the FASB's Accounting Standards Codification. The Company considers the applicability and impact of all ASUs. While management continues to assess the possible impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements of the future adoption of new accounting standards that are not yet effective, management currently believes that the following new standards may have a material impact on the ~~Company’s~~Company's financial statements and disclosures:

No other recently issued accounting standards that are not yet effective have been identified that management believes are likely to have a material impact on the Company's financial statements.

On January 29, 2016, the Company completed ~~the Initial Montana Acquisition, which involved~~ the acquisition of approximately 1,100 gaming devices, as well as certain other non-gaming assets and the right to operate within certain locations, from C. Lohman Games, Inc., Rocky Mountain Gaming, Inc. and Brandy’s Shoreliner Restaurant, Inc.~~, for~~ (the “Initial Montana Acquisition”). The total consideration offor the transaction was $20.1 million, including the issuance of $0.5 million of the Company’s common stock (comprising 50,252 shares at fair value at issuance of $9.95 per share). In connection with the Initial Montana Acquisition, the Company is required to pay the sellers contingent consideration of up to a total of $2.0 million in cash paid in four quarterly payments beginning in September 2017, subject to certain potential adjustments. See Note ~~11,~~9, Financial Instruments and Fair Value Measurements, for further discussion regarding the estimated fair value of the contingent consideration. The preliminary allocation of the $20.1 million purchase price to the assets acquired as of January 29, 2016 includes $1.7 million of cash, $2.4 million of property and equipment, $14.2 million of intangible assets and $1.9 million of goodwill. The preliminary amounts assigned to intangible assets include customer relationships of $9.8 million with an economic life of 15 years, non-compete agreements of $3.9 million with an economic life of five years and trade names of $0.5 million with an economic life of four years.

On April 22, 2016, the Company completed ~~the Second Montana Acquisition, which involved~~ the acquisition of approximately 1,800 gaming devices, as well as amusement devices and certain other non-gaming assets and the right to operate within certain locations, from Amusement Services, LLC ~~for~~(the “Second Montana Acquisition”, and, together with the Initial Montana Acquisitions, the “Montana Acquisitions”). The total consideration offor the transaction was $25.7 million.

The Company followed the acquisition method of accounting for the Montana Acquisitions per ASC 805 guidance. In accordance with ASC 805, the Company allocated the purchase price for each Montana Acquisition to the tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their fair values, which were determined primarily by management with assistance from third-party appraisals. The excess of the purchase prices over those fair values was recorded as goodwill.

The allocation of the $20.1 million purchase price of the Initial Montana Acquisition was finalized in the first quarter of 2017, and as of the date of the acquisition, was comprised of the following:

The intangible assets acquired in the Initial Montana Acquisition and the related weighted average useful lives of definite-lived intangible assets were as follows:

The preliminary allocation of the $25.7 million purchase price toof the ~~assets acquired~~Second Montana Acquisition as of ~~April 22, 2016 includes $0.3 million~~the date of ~~cash, less than $0.1 million~~acquisition was comprised of ~~prepaid gaming license fees, $7.8 million of property and equipment, $11.1 million~~the following:

The preliminary valuation of intangible assets acquired in the Second Montana Acquisition and ~~$6.3 million~~the related weighted average useful lives of ~~goodwill. The preliminary amounts assigned to~~definite –lived intangible assets include customer relationships of $9.1 million with an economic life of 15 years, non-compete agreements of $1.8 million with an economic life of five years and trade names of $0.2 million with an economic life of four years.were as follows:

The goodwill recognized in the Montana Acquisitions iswas primarily attributable to potential expansion and future development of, and anticipated synergies from, the acquired businesses and is expected to be deductible for income tax purposes. The Company's estimation of the fair value of the assets acquired in the Montana Acquisitions as of the respective dates of the acquisitions was determined based on certain valuations and analyses. For the Second Montana Acquisition, those valuations and analyses ~~that~~ have yet to be finalized, and accordingly, the assets acquired in that transaction are subject to adjustment once such analyses are completed. The Company may record adjustments to the carrying value of assets acquired in the Second Montana Acquisition with a corresponding offset to goodwill during the applicable measurement period, which can be up to one year from the date of the consummation of the ~~relevant~~ acquisition.

The Company reports the results of operations from each of the Montana Acquisitions, subsequent to their respective closing date, within its Distributed Gaming segment. For the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2017 and 2016, net revenues from the Montana Acquisitions totaled ~~$15.1~~$15.2 million and ~~$32.0~~$4.0 million, respectively. For the three months ended ~~September 30, 2016, there were no transaction-related costs for the Montana Acquisitions. For the nine months ended September 30,~~March 31, 2017 and 2016, transaction-related costs for the Montana Acquisitions totaled $0.1 million and $0.2 million, respectively, and were included in preopening expenses. The Company may incur additional transaction-related costs related to the Montana Acquisitions in future periods. Pro forma information is not being presented

as there is no practicable method to calculate pro forma earnings given that the Montana Acquisitions were asset purchases that represented only a component of the businesses of the sellers. As a result, historical financial information obtained would have required significant estimates.

On July 31, 2015, the Company acquired Sartini Gaming through the consummation of the Merger. At the effective time of the Merger, all issued and outstanding shares of capital stock of Sartini Gaming were canceled and converted into the right to receive shares of the Company’s common stock. At the closing of the Merger, the Company issued 7,772,736 shares of its common stock to The Blake L. Sartini and Delise F. Sartini Family Trust (the “Sartini Trust”), as sole shareholder of Sartini Gaming in accordance with the agreement and plan of merger (the “Merger Agreement”). In addition, at the closing of the Merger, the Company issued 457,172 shares of its common stock to holders of warrants issued by a subsidiary of Sartini Gaming that elected to receive shares of the Company’s common stock in exchange for their warrants. The total number of shares of the Company’s common stock issued in connection with the Merger was subject to adjustment pursuant to the post-closing adjustment provisions of the Merger Agreement. In connection with such post-closing adjustment, the Company issued an additional 223,657 shares of its common stock to the Sartini Trust. As a result, the value of the purchase consideration following such adjustment was $77.4 million. This amount is the product of the 8,453,565 shares of the Company’s common stock issued in the aggregate in connection with the Merger and the closing price of $9.15 per share of the Company's common stock on July 31, 2015. In August 2016, the 777,274 shares previously held in escrow as security in the event of any claims for indemnifiable losses in accordance with the Merger Agreement were released to the Sartini Trust in accordance with the terms of the escrow agreement.

Under the Merger Agreement, the number of shares of the Company’s common stock issued in connection with the Merger reflected the pre-Merger value of Sartini Gaming relative to the pre-Merger value of the Company, which pre-Merger values were calculated in accordance with formulas set forth in the Merger Agreement. To determine the number of shares of the Company’s common stock issued in connection with the Merger, the sum of the number of shares of the Company’s common stock outstanding immediately prior to the Merger and the number of shares issuable upon the exercise of outstanding in-the-money stock options was divided by the percentage of the total pre-Merger value of both companies that represented the Company’s pre-Merger value to determine the total number of fully diluted shares immediately following the Merger. The number of shares of the Company’s common stock issued in connection with the Merger was the difference between the total number of fully diluted shares immediately following the Merger and the total number of fully diluted shares immediately prior to the Merger. No fractional shares of the Company’s common stock were issued in connection with the Merger, and any fractional share was rounded to the nearest whole share.

The Merger Agreement specified the procedure for determining the pre-Merger values of Sartini Gaming and the Company. The final pre-Merger values of the Company and Sartini Gaming were determined and approved during the fourth quarter of 2015, pursuant to the post-closing adjustment provisions of the Merger Agreement.

~~The total number of shares of the Company’s common stock issued in connection with the Merger was as follows:~~

~~Merger Accounting.~~ ~~The Merger has been accounted for under the purchase method of accounting in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification Topic 805,~~ ~~Business Combinations~~. Under the purchase method, the total purchase price, or consideration transferred, was measured at the Merger closing date. The purchase price of the acquisition was allocated to the tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values at the acquisition date. The excess of the purchase price over the estimated fair values was recorded as goodwill. The goodwill recognized in the Merger was primarily attributable to potential expansion and future development of, and anticipated synergies from, the tavern brands and the acquired distributed gaming and casino businesses, while enhancing the Company’s existing brand and casino portfolio. None of the goodwill recognized is expected to be deductible for income tax purposes. The Company allocated the goodwill to each reporting unit at the conclusion of the measurement period.

~~Measurement Period Adjustments.~~ The final pre-Merger values of the Company and Sartini Gaming were determined and approved during the fourth quarter of 2015, pursuant to the post-closing adjustment provisions of the Merger Agreement. As a result of this post-closing adjustment calculation, the number of shares issued in connection with the Merger was increased by an additional 223,657 shares, and the 388,637 shares of the Company's common stock held in escrow as security for the post-closing adjustment were released to the Sartini Trust. The effect of the issuance of these additional shares on the purchase price consideration calculation was an increase of $2.1 million to $77.4 million. This amount is the product of the 8,453,565 total shares of the Company’s common stock issued in connection with the Merger on July 31, 2015 and issued pursuant to the post-closing “true-up” adjustment and the $9.15 per share closing price of the Company's common stock on July 31, 2015. The Company accounted for the issuance of the additional 223,657 shares, and the adjustment of the purchase price consideration, during the fourth quarter of 2015 when the additional shares were issued.

The measurement period for the Merger ended on July 31, 2016. In addition to the issuance of the additional shares pursuant to the post-closing adjustment calculation mentioned above, during the measurement period, the Company:

~~Allocation.~~ ~~The final allocation of the $77.4 million purchase price to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of July 31, 2015 was as follows (in thousands):~~

~~The amounts assigned to property and equipment by category are summarized in the table below (in thousands):~~

~~The amounts assigned to intangible assets by category are summarized in the table below (in thousands):~~

The trade names acquired encompass the various trade names utilized by the three casinos located in Pahrump, Nevada: Pahrump Nugget, Gold Town Casino and Lakeside Casino & RV Park. Additionally, the acquired branded taverns utilize various trade names to market and create brand identity for their services and for marketing purposes, including: PT’s Pub, PT’s Gold, Sierra Gold and Sean Patrick’s. The trade names for the Pahrump casinos and taverns have indefinite lives.

Player relationships acquired include relationships with players frequenting the Company’s branded taverns and Nevada casinos. These player relationships comprise Golden Rewards members for the taverns and Gold Mine Rewards members for the Nevada casinos, and such relationships are expected to lead to recurring revenue streams, as well as new revenue opportunities arising from the reputations of the taverns and Nevada casinos.

Customer relationships relate to relationships with the Company’s third party distributed gaming customers that have been developed over many years and are expected to lead to recurring revenue streams, as well as new revenue opportunities arising from the Company’s reputation. The economic life of the customer relationships was determined to be 13 to 16 years, depending on the customer, and was based on the estimated present value of cash flows attributable to the asset.

~~The Nevada casinos maintain gaming licenses that allow them to operate in their current capacity. The Nevada gaming licenses have an indefinite life.~~

Other intangible assets acquired include internally developed software and non-compete agreements. The software is utilized for accounting and marketing purposes and is integrated into the Company’s gaming devices in its distributed gaming operations. The economic life of this software was determined to be 10 years based on the expected future utilization of the software in its current form. In conjunction with the Merger Agreement, key employees executed non-competition agreements. The economic life of these non-compete agreements was determined to be two years based on the contractual term of the agreements.

~~Estimated future amortization expense related to the finite-lived intangible assets acquired in the Merger is as follows:~~

~~See Note 11,~~ ~~Financial Instruments and Fair Value Measurements, for further discussion regarding the valuation of the tangible and intangible assets acquired through the Merger.~~

~~Credit Agreement.~~ In connection with the Merger, the Company entered into a Credit Agreement with Capital One, National Association (as administrative agent) and the lenders named therein (the “Credit Agreement”) to refinance the outstanding senior secured indebtedness of Sartini Gaming and the Company’s financing facility with Centennial Bank. See Note 5, ~~Debt, for a discussion of the Credit Agreement and associated refinancing.~~

~~Selected Financial Information Related to the Acquiree.~~ The consolidated financial position of Sartini Gaming is included in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 and Sartini Gaming’s consolidated results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 are included in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations and cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2016. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, the Company recorded net revenues of $71.0 million and $217.8 million, respectively, and net income of $4.8 million and $19.3 million, respectively, from the operations of Sartini Gaming’s distributed gaming and casino businesses. Total assets related to Sartini Gaming’s distributed gaming and casino businesses were approximately $235.5 million and $70.7 million, respectively, as of September 30, 2016, which consisted primarily of property and equipment and intangible assets, including goodwill.

~~Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Financial Information.~~ ~~The following unaudited pro forma combined financial information is presented as if the Merger had occurred at the beginning of the period presented:~~

This unaudited pro forma combined financial information has been prepared for illustrative purposes only and is not necessarily indicative of or intended to represent the results that would have been achieved had the Merger been consummated as of the date indicated or that may be achieved in the future. The unaudited pro forma combined financial information does not reflect any operating efficiencies and associated cost savings that may be achieved as a result of the Merger.

~~The following adjustments have been made to the pro forma combined net income and pro forma combined net income per share in the table above:~~

	September 30, 2016			December 31, 2015
	(In thousands)
(In thousands)							March 31, 2017			December 31, 2016
Land	$	12,470		$	12,470		$	12,470		$	12,470
Building and site improvements		76,450			67,984			83,927			77,515
Furniture and equipment		72,935			45,840			75,779			75,740
Construction in process		2,889			1,833			6,456			5,246
Property and equipment		164,744			128,127			178,632			170,971
Less: Accumulated depreciation		(28,325	)		(13,818	)		(37,989	)		(33,390	)
Property and equipment, net	$	136,419		$	114,309		$	140,643		$	137,581

~~As of September 30,~~Depreciation expense for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, ~~and December 31, 2015, the furniture and equipment balance contained approximately $4.2~~was $4.6 million and ~~$4.8~~$4.3 million, ~~respectively, of gaming device equipment that the Company had not yet placed into service and therefore had not begun depreciating.~~respectively.

September 30, 2016

December 31, 2015

(In thousands)

Goodwill

$
105,655

$
96,288

Indefinite-lived intangible assets:

Gaming licenses

$
960

$
960

Trade names

12,200

12,200

Other

110

50

$
13,270

$
13,210

Finite-lived intangible assets:

Customer relationships

$
78,100

$
59,200

Less: Accumulated amortization

(5,570
)

(1,744
)

72,530

57,456

Player relationships

7,300

7,600

Less: Accumulated amortization

(750
)

(279
)

6,550

7,321

Gaming license

2,100

2,100

Less: Accumulated amortization

(472
)

(367
)

1,628

1,733

Non-compete agreements

6,000

300

Less: Accumulated amortization

(845
)

(63
)

5,155

237

Other intangible assets

1,648

948

Less: Accumulated amortization

(237
)

(81
)

1,411

867

Total finite-lived intangible assets, net

87,274

67,614

Total intangible assets, net

$
100,544

$
80,824

(In thousands)	March 31, 2017		December 31, 2016
Goodwill
Distributed Gaming	$	97,859	$	97,859
Casinos		7,796		7,796
Total Goodwill	$	105,655	$	105,655

Goodwill ~~represents~~was acquired in connection with the ~~original goodwill allocation related to~~2015 acquisition of Sartini Gaming, Inc. through a merger transaction (the “Merger”), as well as the Merger and final adjustments to purchase price allocations during the measurement period. The impact of the final purchase price allocation adjustments related to the Merger on the Company's results of operations and financial position was immaterial.Montana Acquisitions. The Company may continue to record adjustments to the carrying value of assets

acquired with a corresponding offset to goodwill during the measurement period related to the Second Montana ~~Acquisitions,~~Acquisition, which can be up to one year from the date of the consummation of the ~~acquisitions.~~acquisition. See Note 2, ~~Merger and~~ Acquisitions, for a description of the intangible assets acquired through the ~~Merger and~~Montana Acquisitions.

	March 31, 2017
	Weighted	Gross
	Average Life	Carrying		Cumulative			Intangible
(In thousands)	Remaining	Value		Amortization			Assets, Net
Indefinite-lived intangible assets
Gaming licenses	Indefinite	$	960	$	—		$	960
Trade names	Indefinite		12,200		—			12,200
Other	Indefinite		185		—			185
			13,345		—			13,345

Finite-lived intangible assets
Player relationships	10.2 years		7,300		(1,071	)		6,229
Gaming license	11.1 years		2,100		(542	)		1,558
Non-compete agreements	3.7 years		6,000		(1,490	)		4,510
Other intangible assets	9.3 years		1,648		(359	)		1,289
			17,048		(3,462	)		13,586
Total intangible assets, other than customer relationships		$	30,393	$	(3,462	)	$	26,931

Customer relationships	13.0 years	$	78,100	$	(8,293	)	$	69,807

	December 31, 2016
	Weighted	Gross
	Average Life	Carrying		Cumulative			Intangible
(In thousands)	Remaining	Value		Amortization			Assets, Net
Indefinite-lived intangible assets
Gaming licenses	Indefinite	$	960	$	—		$	960
Trade names	Indefinite		12,200		—			12,200
Other	Indefinite		110		—			110
			13,270		—			13,270

Finite-lived intangible assets
Player relationships	10.4 years		7,300		(910	)		6,390
Gaming license	11.4 years		2,100		(508	)		1,592
Non-compete agreements	4.0 years		6,000		(1,168	)		4,832
Other intangible assets	9.5 years		1,648		(297	)		1,351
			17,048		(2,883	)		14,165
Total intangible assets, other than customer relationships		$	30,318	$	(2,883	)	$	27,435

Customer relationships	13.2 years	$	78,100	$	(6,932	)	$	71,168

Total amortization expense related to intangible assets was $2.0 million and ~~$1.1~~$1.4 million for the three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2017 and 2016, ~~and 2015, respectively, and $5.4 million and $1.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015,~~ respectively. ~~Estimated~~As of March 31, 2017, estimated future amortization expense ~~related to intangible assets, which includes acquired intangible assets recorded on a preliminary basis, is~~was as follows:

As of March 31, ~~2015,~~2017, the ~~Company entered into a~~facilities under the Company’s Credit Agreement with ~~the lenders named therein and~~ Capital One, National Association (as administrative agent)~~. The Credit Agreement was amended on March 25, 2016 to, among other matters, increase~~ and the ~~size of the senior secured revolving credit facility under the Credit Agreement~~lenders named therein (the ~~“Revolving Credit Facility”~~“Credit Agreement”) from $40.0 million to $50.0 million and to provide for the borrowing of an additional $40.0 million in aggregate principal amount of incremental senior secured term loans under the Credit Agreement (the “Incremental Term Loans”). As of September 30, 2016, the facilities under the Credit Agreement consisted of $160.0 million in senior secured term loans ~~(the “Term Loans,” which include the Incremental~~ (“Term ~~Loans)~~Loans”) and a $50.0 million Revolving Credit Facility (together with the Term Loans, the “Facilities”). The Company used the proceeds from the Incremental Term Loan borrowings to repay all of the Company’s then-outstanding borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility. As of September 30, 2016, the Company had $153.0 million in principal amount of outstanding Term Loan borrowings and $25.0 million in principal amount of outstanding borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility. The ~~Facilities~~facilities mature on July 31, 2020.

Borrowings under the Credit Agreement bear interest, at the Company’s option, at either (1) the highest of the federal funds rate plus 0.50%, the Eurodollar rate for a one-month interest period plus 1.00%, or the administrative agent’s prime rate as announced from time to time, or (2) the Eurodollar rate for the applicable interest period, plus in each case, an applicable margin based on the Company’s leverage ratio. ~~As of September 30, 2016,~~For the ~~weighted average~~three months ended March 31, 2017, the weighted-average effective interest rate on the Company’s outstanding borrowings under the Credit Agreement was approximately ~~3.02%~~3.3%.

Outstanding borrowings under the Term Loans must be repaid in two quarterly payments of $1.5 million each (which commenced on December 31, 2015), followed by two quarterly payments of $2.0 million each (which commenced on June 30, 2016), followed by eight quarterly payments of $3.0 million each (commencing December 31, 2016), followed by four quarterly payments of $4.0 million each (commencing December 31, 2018), followed by three quarterly payments of $6.0 million each (commencing December 31, 2019), followed by a final installment of $95.0 million at maturity on July 31, 2020. The commitment fee for the Revolving Credit Facility is payable quarterly at a rate of between 0.25% and 0.30%, depending on the Company’s leverage ratio.

The Credit Agreement is guaranteed by all of the Company’s present and future direct and indirect wholly owned subsidiaries (other than certain insignificant or unrestricted subsidiaries), and is secured by substantially all of the Company’s and the subsidiary guarantors’ present and future personal and real property (subject to receipt of certain approvals).

Under the Credit Agreement, the Company and its subsidiaries are subject to certain limitations, including limitations on their ability to: incur additional debt, grant liens, sell assets, make certain investments, pay dividends and make certain other restricted payments. In addition, the Company will be required to pay down the Facilities under certain circumstances if the Company or any of its subsidiaries sells assets or property, issues debt or receives certain extraordinary receipts. The Credit Agreement contains financial covenants regarding a maximum leverage ratio and a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio. The Credit Agreement also prohibits the occurrence of a change of control, which includes the acquisition of beneficial ownership of 30% or more of the Company’s equity securities (other than by certain permitted holders, which include, among others, Blake L. Sartini, Lyle A. Berman and certain affiliated entities) and a change in a majority of the members of the Company’s Board of Directors that is not approved by the Board. If the Company defaults under the Credit Agreement due to a covenant breach or otherwise, the lenders may be entitled to, among other things, require the immediate repayment of all outstanding amounts and sell the Company’s assets to satisfy the obligations thereunder. The Company was in compliance with its financial covenants under the Credit Agreement as of ~~September 30, 2016.~~

Borrowings under the Company’s Facilities bear interest at a variable rate. To hedge the associated interest rate risk, in September 2016, the Company entered into an interest rate swap agreement that has the economic effect of modifying the variable interest obligations associated with 75% of the Company’s projected outstanding borrowings under the Company’s Facilities so that the LIBOR portion of the interest payable thereunder will effectively be fixed at 0.98% per annum. This agreement covers the period from December 30, 2016 through DecemberMarch 31, 2020 and changes in the cash flows of the interest rate swap are expected to be highly effective in offsetting the forecasted changes in interest rate payments associated with interest rate fluctuations on the portion of the Company's variable rate debt for which it applies.

The material terms of the interest rate swap agreement match the material terms of the Facilities that the interest rate swap agreement pertains to, including the notional amounts and maturity date. The Company has designated this interest rate swap agreement as a qualifying hedging instrument and will account for it as a fair value hedge pursuant to ASC 815, ~~Derivatives and Hedging~~. The transaction is characterized as a fair value hedge for financial accounting purposes because it protects the Company against changes in the fair value of certain of the Company’s variable-rate borrowings due to benchmark interest rate movements. The Company does not use any interest rate swap agreements for trading purposes.

The retail value of food and beverages, rooms and other services furnished to customers without charge, including coupons for discounts when redeemed, is included in gross revenues and then deducted as promotional allowances. The estimated retail value of the promotional allowances was as follows:

	Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended				Three Months Ended
	September 30, 2016		September 30, 2015		September 30, 2016		September 30, 2015
	(In thousands)				(In thousands)
(In thousands)									March 31, 2017		March 31, 2016
Food and beverage	$	4,147	$	2,496	$	12,344	$	2,808	$	4,835	$	4,018
Rooms		678		501		1,637		1,562		533		455
Other		157		71		451		160		121		73
Total promotional allowances	$	4,982	$	3,068	$	14,432	$	4,530	$	5,489	$	4,546

The estimated cost of providing these promotional allowances, which is primarily included in gaming expenses, was as follows:

	Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended				Three Months Ended
	September 30, 2016		September 30, 2015		September 30, 2016		September 30, 2015
	(In thousands)				(In thousands)
(In thousands)									March 31, 2017		March 31, 2016
Food and beverage	$	3,270	$	914	$	9,373	$	1,052	$	3,358	$	3,014
Rooms		244		143		625		452		164		191
Other		88		82		304		157		83		81
Total estimated cost of promotional allowances	$	3,602	$	1,139	$	10,302	$	1,661	$	3,605	$	3,286

On December 9, 2015, the Company sold its $60.0 million subordinated promissory note (“Jamul Note”) from the Jamul Indian Village (“Jamul Tribe”) to a subsidiary of Penn National Gaming, Inc. for $24.0 million in cash. Under the terms of the Merger Agreement with Sartini GamingStock Incentive Plans and subject to applicable law, the Company agreed that the proceeds received from the sale of the Jamul Note, net of related costs, would be distributed in a cash dividend to its shareholders holding shares as of the record date for such dividend (other than shareholders that had waived their right to receive such dividend). Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, Sartini Gaming’s former sole shareholder, for itself and any related party transferees of its shares, waived their right to receive such dividend with respect to their shares (which totaled 7,996,393 shares in the aggregate). Also in connection with the Merger, holders of an additional 457,172 shares waived their right to receive such dividend. On June 17, 2016, the Board of Directors of the Company approved and declared the special dividend to the eligible shareholders of record on the close of business on June 30, 2016 (the “Record Date”) of cash in the aggregate amount of approximately $23.5 million (the “Special Dividend”), which was paid on July 14, 2016. The $1.71 per share amount of the Special Dividend was calculated by dividing the aggregate amount of the Special Dividend by 13,759,374 outstanding shares of common stock held by eligible shareholders on the close of business on the Record Date (rounded down to the nearest whole cent per share).

On August 27, 2015, the Board of Directors of the Company approved the Golden Entertainment, Inc. 2015 Incentive Award Plan (the “2015 Plan”), which was approved by the Company’s shareholders at the Company’s 2016 annual meeting. The 2015 Plan authorizes the issuance of stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units (“RSUs”), dividend equivalents, stock payment awards, stock appreciation rights, performance bonus awards and other incentive awards. The 2015 Plan authorizes the grant of awards to employees, non-employee directors and consultants of the Company and its subsidiaries. Options generally have a ten-year term. Except as provided in any employment agreement between the Company and the employee, if an employee is terminated (voluntarily or involuntarily), any unvested options as of the date of termination will be forfeited.

The maximum number of shares of the Company’s common stock for which grants may be made under the 2015 Plan is 2.25 million shares, plus an annual increase on each January 1 during the ten-year term of the 2015 Plan equal to the lesser of 1.8 million shares, 4% of the total shares of the Company’s common stock outstanding (on an as-converted basis) and such smaller amount as may be determined by the Board in its sole discretion. In addition, the maximum aggregate number of shares of common stock that may be subject to awards granted to any one participant during a calendar year is 2.0 million shares. The annual increase on January 1, ~~2016~~2017 was ~~874,709~~889,259 shares.

The 2015 Plan provides that no stock option or stock appreciation right (even if vested) may be exercised prior to the earlier of August 1, 2018 or immediately prior to the consummation of a change in control of the Company that would result in an “ownership change” as defined in Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. There were ~~2,813,070~~3,539,358 stock options outstanding under the 2015 Plan as of ~~September 30, 2016,~~March 31, 2017, of which ~~444,301 have~~720,021 had vested. As of ~~September 30, 2016,~~March 31, 2017, a total of ~~311,639~~333,314 shares of the Company’s common stock remained available for grants of awards under the 2015 Plan.

In June 2007, the Company’s shareholders approved the 2007 Lakes Stock Option and Compensation Plan (the “2007 Plan”), which is authorized to grant a total of 1.25 million shares of the Company’s common stock. Vested options are exercisable for ten years from the date of grant; however, if the employee is terminated (voluntarily or involuntarily), any unvested options as of the date of termination will be forfeited. There were ~~402,671~~673,675 stock options outstanding under the 2007 Plan as of ~~September 30, 2016, all~~March 31, 2017, 391,040 of which ~~were fully~~had vested. As of ~~September 30, 2016, a total of 282,635~~March 31, 2017, no shares of the Company’s common stock remained available for grants of awards under the 2007 Plan.

~~The Company also has a 1998~~ Stock Option and Compensation Plan (the “1998 Plan”). There were 11,202 stock options outstanding under this plan as of September 30, 2016, all of which were fully vested. No additional options will be granted under the 1998 Plan.

Share-based compensation expense related to stock options was $1.7 million and $0.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, and $2.5 million and $0.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.Options

The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to estimate the fair value and compensation cost associated with employee incentive stock options, which requires ~~the consideration of~~considerable judgment, including estimating stock price volatility, expected option life and

forfeiture rates. The Company develops estimates based on historical ~~employee exercise behavior~~ data and ~~the use of a number of assumptions including volatility of the Company’s stock price, the weighted-average risk-free interest rate and the weighted-average expected life of the options.~~market information, which can change significantly over time. There were ~~905,000 and 1,128,070~~847,000 stock options granted ~~under the 2015 Plan during~~in the three ~~and nine~~

months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2017, and 160,000 stock options granted in the three months ended March 31, 2016, ~~respectively,~~ with a weighted-average grant date fair ~~value~~values of ~~$4.80~~$5.89 and $3.94 per share, respectively.

Share-based compensation expense related to stock options was $1.0 million and ~~$4.83 per share, respectively. There were 1,610,000 options granted during~~$0.4 million for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2015.~~March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

The following table summarizes the Company’s stock option activity during the ~~nine months ended September 30, 2016 and September 30, 2015:~~

Number of Common Shares

Weighted-

Options

Available

Average

Outstanding

Exercisable

for Grant

Exercise Price

2016

Balance at December 31, 2015

2,419,529

724,529

837,635

$
8.16

Authorized

—

874,709

—

Granted

1,128,070

(1,128,070
)

11.89

Options Subject to Anti-Dilutive Adjustments

(2,337,643
)

—

8.75

Options Subject to Anti-Dilutive Adjustments

2,337,643

—

7.04

Exercised

(310,656
)

—

5.73

Cancelled

(10,000
)

10,000

9.33

Balance at September 30, 2016

3,226,943

413,873

594,274

$
8.57

2015

Balance at December 28, 2014

755,617

616,792

276,635

$
6.09

Authorized

—

2,250,000

—

Granted

1,610,000

(1,610,000
)

9.05

Exercised

(5,000
)

—

7.03

Cancelled

(6,000
)

6,000

9.19

Balance at September 30, 2015

2,354,617

744,617

922,635

$
8.10

~~In connection with the Special Dividend discussed in Note 7,~~ ~~Shareholders’ Equity~~, and in accordance with the Company’s equity incentive plans approved by the Company’s shareholders, equitable anti-dilutive adjustments were made to the exercise prices of outstanding stock options to purchase shares of Company common stock, in order to preserve the value of such stock options following the Special Dividend. Accordingly, effective as of the close of business on July 14, 2016, the exercise price of each outstanding stock option under the 2015 Plan, the 2007 Plan and the 1998 Plan (collectively, the “Adjusted Options”) was reduced by $1.71 per share. The weighted average exercise price of the Adjusted Options presented in the table above has been adjusted accordingly. The Adjusted Options had a weighted average exercise price of $7.04 per share after giving effect to such anti-dilutive adjustments. The Adjusted Options have varying remaining terms, which were not affected by the adjustments. The Company measured the incremental compensation cost as the excess of the fair value of the Adjusted Options immediately following such anti-dilutive adjustments over the fair value of the Adjusted Options immediately prior to such anti-dilutive adjustments. Of the 2,337,643 Adjusted Options, 1,908,070 were unvested and 429,573 were vested. The incremental fair value related to the unvested Adjusted Options resulting from the anti-dilutive adjustments was estimated to be $1.7 million, which will be recorded over the remaining vesting period of such Adjusted Options. The incremental fair value related to the vested Adjusted Options resulting from the anti-dilutive adjustments, determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, was $0.7 million and has been recorded as share-based compensation expense during the three months ended ~~September 30, 2016.~~March 31, 2017 and 2016:

	Number of Common Shares								Weighted-
	Options					Available			Average
	Outstanding			Exercisable		for Grant			Exercise Price
2017
Balance at December 31, 2016		3,402,481			411,029		274,596		$	9.02
Authorized		—					889,259			—
Granted		847,000					(847,000	)		13.36
Exercised		(19,989	)				—			7.70
Cancelled		(16,459	)				16,459			10.48
Balance at March 31, 2017		4,213,033			391,040		333,314		$	9.90

2016
Balance at December 31, 2015		2,419,529			724,529		837,635		$	8.16
Authorized		—					874,709			—
Granted		160,000					(160,000	)		10.53
Exercised		(159,626	)				—			10.24
Balance at March 31, 2016		2,419,903			564,903		1,552,344		$	8.49

As of ~~September 30, 2016,~~March 31, 2017, the outstanding stock options had a weighted-average remaining contractual life of ~~8.3~~8.1 years, weighted-average exercise price of ~~$8.57~~$9.90 per share and an aggregate intrinsic value of ~~$12.6~~$14.2 million. As of ~~September 30, 2016,~~March 31, 2017, the outstanding exercisable stock options had a weighted-average remaining contractual life of ~~2.0~~1.6 years, weighted-average exercise price of ~~$4.50~~$4.34 per share and an aggregate intrinsic value of ~~$3.3~~$3.5 million.

There were ~~15,700~~19,989 and ~~310,656~~159,626 options exercised during the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2017 and 2016 was $0.1 million and ~~$1.7~~$0.7 million, respectively. There were 2,500 and 5,000 options exercised during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively. The total intrinsic value of options exercised during both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 was less than $0.1 million. The Company’s unrecognized share-based compensation expense related to stock options was approximately ~~$10.9~~$14.5 million as of ~~September 30, 2016,~~March 31, 2017, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of ~~3.2~~3.3 years.

The Company issues new shares of common stock upon the exercise of stock options.

~~Note 9 – Net Income (Loss) per Share~~There were 141,296 RSUs outstanding under the 2015 Plan as of ~~Common Stock~~

For all periods, basic net income (loss) per share is calculated by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted-average common shares outstanding. Diluted net income per share in profitable periods reflects the effectMarch 31, 2017, none of ~~all potentially dilutive common shares outstanding by dividing net income by the weighted-average of all common and potentially dilutive shares outstanding. Weighted-average shares~~which had vested. Share-based compensation expense related to ~~potentially dilutive stock options of 616,968~~RSUs was $0.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015, and 127,299 and 221,667 for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, were not used to compute diluted net income (loss) per share because the effects would have been anti-dilutive. ForMarch 31, 2017. There was no RSU activity during the three months ended ~~September 30, 2016, all weighted-average shares related to potentially dilutive stock options were used to compute diluted net income (loss) per share.~~March 31, 2016.

The Company’s effective tax rate was ~~10.7%~~-46.4% and ~~(109.6)%~~2.5% for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2017 and 2016, ~~and 2015,~~ respectively. ~~For~~

Income tax benefit was $1.7 million for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2016, the effective tax rate differed from the federal tax rate of 35% due~~March 31, 2017, which was attributed primarily to changes in the valuation allowance for deferred tax assets. For the nine months ended September 30, 2015, the effective tax rate differed from the federal tax rate of 35% due primarily to the $12.7 milliona partial release of ~~an existing~~ valuation ~~allowance and the limitation of the income tax benefit due to the uncertainty of its future realization.~~

allowance. Income tax expense was ~~$0.8~~less than $0.1 million for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2016, which was attributed primarily to tax amortization of indefinite-lived intangibles and measurement period adjustments to goodwill. Income tax benefit was $12.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015, which was related to the release of an existing valuation allowance resulting from the assumption of a $12.7 million net deferred tax liability generated from intangible assets acquired in the Merger.intangibles.

In connection with the Merger, on July 31, 2015, the Company entered into a NOL Preservation Agreement with ~~the~~The Blake L. Sartini and Delise F. Sartini Family Trust (the “Sartini Trust”), Lyle A. Berman (a director and shareholder of the Company), as well as certain other shareholders of the Company affiliated with Mr. Berman or ~~another~~that are trusts for which Neil Sell, a director of the ~~Company.~~Company, serves as trustee. The NOL Preservation Agreement is intended to help minimize the risk of an “ownership change,” within the meaning of Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, that would limit the Company’s ability to utilize its federal net operating loss carryforwards to offset future taxable income.

Deferred tax assets are evaluated by considering historical levels of income, estimates of future taxable income and the impact of tax planning strategies. ~~Management has evaluated all available evidence and has determined that negative evidence continues to outweigh positive evidence for~~The Company's financial results include the ~~realization~~reversal of a portion of the valuation allowance recorded against the deferred tax assets ~~and as~~of the Company. This reversal resulted in the recognition of a ~~result continues to provide~~$1.7 million income tax benefit for the three months ended March 31, 2017. The Company has performed a ~~full valuation allowance against~~continuing evaluation of its deferred tax ~~assets as~~asset valuation allowance on a quarterly basis. The Company concluded that, effective December 31, 2016, it is more likely than not that the Company will generate sufficient taxable income within the applicable net operating loss carry-forward periods to realize a portion of ~~September 30, 2016.~~its deferred tax assets. This conclusion, and the resulting partial reversal of the deferred tax asset valuation allowance, is based upon consideration of several factors, including the Company's completion of six consecutive quarters of profitability, its demonstrated ability in such quarters to meet or exceed budgets, and its forecast of future profitability.

The Company's income taxes receivable ~~of $2.4~~was $0.2 million as of ~~September 30, 2016,~~March 31, 2017, and ~~$2.1~~$2.3 million as of December 31, ~~2015,~~2016. The decrease in income taxes receivable was primarily ~~relates~~due to the collection of a $2.2 million tax refund which was released in connection with the settlement of an IRS audit related to 2012 taxable losses carried back to a prior year. The Company is currently under IRS audit for the 2009 through 2013 tax years and the IRS has proposed certain adjustments to the tax filings for those years. However, the Company believes it is more likely than not that it will prevail in challenging the proposed adjustments and maintains that the positions taken were proper and supported by applicable laws and regulations. The Company does not believe that this dispute, when resolved, will have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements.

~~Estimates of fair value for financial assets and liabilities are based on the framework established in the~~The authoritative accounting guidance for fair value ~~measurements. The framework defines fair value, provides guidance for measuring fair value and requires certain disclosures. The framework discusses~~measurements specifies a hierarchy of valuation techniques such as the market approach (comparable market prices), the income approach (present value of future income or cash flow) and the cost approach (cost to replace the service capacity of an asset or replacement cost). The framework utilizes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizesbased on whether the inputs to those valuation techniques ~~used to measure~~are observable or unobservable. Observable inputs reflect market data obtained from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect the Company's market assumptions. These inputs create the following fair value ~~into three broad levels. The following is a brief description of those three levels:~~hierarchy:

~~The Company’s financial instruments consist~~Financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of ~~cash~~input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Thus, assets and ~~cash equivalents, accounts payable, interest rate swaps~~liabilities categorized as Level 3 may be measured at fair value using inputs that are observable (Levels 1 and ~~debt.~~2) and unobservable (Level 3). Management's assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement requires judgment and may affect the valuation of assets and liabilities and their placement within the fair value hierarchy levels.

For the Company’s cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and payable, short-term borrowings and accrued and other current ~~portion of long-term debt,~~liabilities, the carrying amounts approximate fair value because of the short duration of these financial instruments. As of ~~September 30, 2016~~March 31, 2017 and December 31, ~~2015,~~2016, the fair value of the Company’s long-term debt ~~approximates~~approximated the carrying value based upon the Company’s expected borrowing rate for debt with similar remaining maturities and comparable risk. ~~See Note 5,~~ ~~Debt, for a discussion of the Company’s interest rate swap agreements.~~

In connection with the Montana Acquisitions, the Company preliminarily recognized the acquired assets at fair value. For the Initial Montana Acquisition, these amounts were finalized as of March 31, 2017. All amounts are recognized as Level 3 measurements due to the subjective nature of the unobservable inputs used to determine the fair values. Additionally, in connection with the Initial Montana Acquisition, the Company is required to pay the sellers contingent consideration of up to a total of $2.0 million in cash paid in four quarterly payments beginning in September 2017, subject to certain potential adjustments based upon the availability of certain gaming machines and, if applicable, the performance of replacement games. The fair value of the Company’s contingent consideration recorded in connection with the Initial Montana Acquisition was estimated to be $2.0 million as of ~~September 30, 2016.~~March 31, 2017 and is recorded in “Other accrued expenses” and “Other long-term obligations” on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet. Changes to the estimated fair value of the contingent consideration will be recognized in earnings of the Company. See Note 2, ~~Merger and~~ Acquisitions, for a discussion of the Montana Acquisitions.

Land, land improvements and building and improvements acquired in connection with the Merger were measured using unobservable (Level 3) inputs at an estimated fair value of $37.8 million. This fair value estimate was calculated considering each of the three generally accepted valuation methodologies including the cost, the sales comparison and the income capitalization approaches. Significant inputs included consideration of highest and best use, replacement cost, recent transactions of comparable properties and the properties’ ability to generate future benefits (see Note 2, ~~Merger and Acquisitions~~).

Leasehold improvements, furniture, fixtures and equipment, and construction in process acquired in connection with the Merger were measured using unobservable (Level 3) inputs at an estimated fair value of $45.4 million. Property and equipment acquired in connection with the Montana Acquisitions were measured using unobservable (Level 3) inputs at an estimated fair value of $7.8 million for the Second Montana Acquisition and $2.4 million for the Initial Montana Acquisition. These fair value estimates were calculated with primary reliance on the cost approach with secondary consideration being placed on the market approach. Significant inputs included consideration of highest and best use, replacement cost and market comparables (see Note 2, ~~Merger and Acquisitions~~).

The identified intangible assets acquired in connection with the Second Montana Acquisition and the Initial Montana Acquisition ~~and Merger~~ have been valued on(on a preliminary basis for the Second Montana Acquisition) using unobservable (Level 3) inputs at a fair value of ~~$11.1~~$11.4 million ~~$14.2 million~~(on a preliminary basis) and ~~$80.5~~$14.4 million, respectively (see Note 2, ~~Merger and~~ Acquisitions).

The Company owns various parcels of developed and undeveloped land relating to its casinos in Pahrump, Nevada, as well as parcels of undeveloped land in California held for sale that related to the Company’s previous involvement in a potential Indian casino project with the Jamul Tribe (“Jamul Land”).Nevada. The Company performs an impairment analysis on the land it owns at least quarterly and determined that no impairment had occurred as of ~~September 30, 2016~~March 31, 2017 and December 31, ~~2015.~~

~~On October 19, 2016, the Company completed the sale of the Jamul Land for $5.5 million and will recognize a gain on sale of land held for sale of $4.2 million during the fourth quarter of~~ 2016.

~~The Company has an operating ground lease with~~There have been no material changes to the ~~Maryland Department of Natural Resources for approximately 270 acres~~Company’s commitments described under Note 15, Commitments and Contingencies, in the ~~Rocky Gap State Park in which Rocky Gap is situated. The lease expires in 2052, with an option to renew for an additional 20 years.~~

~~Under the lease, rent payments are due and payable annually~~consolidated financial statements set forth in the ~~amount of $275,000 plus 0.9% of any gross operator share of gaming revenue (as defined in~~Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the ~~lease) in excess of $275,000,~~year ended December 31, 2016.

Rent Expense and $150,000 plus any surcharge revenue in excess of $150,000. Surcharge revenue consists of amounts billed to and collected from guests and are $3.00 per room per night and $1.00 per round of golf. Rent expense (net of surcharge revenue) associated with the lease was approximately $0.1 million for each of the three months ended September 30, 2016 and September 30, 2015, and $0.2 million for each of the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and September 30, 2015.

The Company’s Gold Town Casino is located on four leased parcels of land, comprising approximately nine acres in the aggregate, in Pahrump, Nevada. The leases are with unrelated third parties and have various expiration dates beginning in 2026 (for the parcel on which the Company’s main casino building is located, which we lease from a competitor), and the Company subleases approximately two of the acres to an unrelated third party. Rental income during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 was less than $0.1 million related to the sublease of the two acres in Pahrump, Nevada.

The Company leases its branded tavern locations, office headquarters building, equipment and vehicles under noncancelable operating leases that are not subject to contingent rents. The original terms of the current branded tavern location leases range from one to 14 years with various renewal options from one to 15 years. The Company has operating leases with related parties for certain of its tavern locations and its office headquarters building. The lease for the Company’s office headquarters building expires in July 2025. A portion of the office headquarters building is sublet to a related party. Rental income during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 was less than $0.1 million for the sublet portion of the office headquarters building. See Note ~~14,~~12, Related Party Transactions, for more detail. Gaming device placement contracts in the form of space lease agreements are also accounted for as operating leases. Under space lease agreements, the Company pays fixed monthly rental fees for the right to install, maintain and operate its gaming devices at business locations, which are recorded in gaming expenses.

Operating lease rental expense, which is calculated on a straight-line basis, net of surcharge revenue, associated with all operating leases was as follows:

	Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended				Three Months Ended
	September 30, 2016		September 30, 2015		September 30, 2016		September 30, 2015
	(In thousands)				(In thousands)
(In thousands)									March 31, 2017		March 31, 2016
Rent expense
Space lease agreements	$	10,284	$	6,445	$	30,730	$	6,445	$	9,527	$	10,137
Related party leases		468		433		1,873		433		576		702
Other operating leases		3,078		1,901		8,619		2,087		3,185		2,727
	$	13,830	$	8,779	$	41,222	$	8,965	$	13,288	$	13,566

As of March 31, 2017, future minimum operating lease payments, excluding contingent rents, were as follows:

	Remainder of
(In thousands)	2017		2018		2019		2020		2021		2022		Thereafter		Total
Minimum lease payments - operating leases
Space lease agreements	$	22,454	$	25,391	$	24,757	$	5,570	$	2,114	$	749	$	703	$	81,738
Related party leases		1,727		2,314		2,326		2,338		2,351		2,368		10,135		23,559
Other operating leases		8,235		10,078		9,371		9,276		8,662		7,624		71,392		124,638
	$	32,416	$	37,783	$	36,454	$	17,184	$	13,127	$	10,741	$	82,230	$	229,935

The current and long-term obligations under capital leases are included in “Current portion of long-term debt, net” and “Long-term debt, net,” respectively. The majority of the capital leases relate to vehicles with minimum lease payment terms of three to four years. During the first quarter of 2017, the Company entered into a capital lease agreement with a related party for one of its tavern locations. See Note 12, Related Party Transactions, for more detail.

As of ~~September 30, 2016,~~March 31, 2017, future minimum capital lease payments, excluding contingent rents, were as follows:

Remainder of

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

Thereafter

Total

(In thousands)

Minimum lease payments - operating leases

Space lease agreements

$
8,379

$
26,544

$
20,012

$
19,391

$
4,523

$
1,018

$
36

$
79,903

Related party leases

620

2,253

1,697

1,709

1,721

1,750

6,545

16,295

Other operating leases

2,553

9,405

8,113

7,365

7,222

6,537

50,740

91,935

$
11,552

$
38,202

$
29,822

$
28,465

$
13,466

$
9,305

$
57,321

$
188,133

Minimum lease payments - capital leases

Furniture and equipment

$
304

$
573

$
555

$
515

$
242

$
79

$
–

$
2,268

Less: Amounts representing interest

(128
)
Total obligations under capital leases

$
2,140

	Remainder of
(In thousands)	2017		2018		2019		2020		2021		2022		Thereafter		Total
Minimum lease payments - capital leases
Furniture and equipment	$	454	$	631	$	545	$	241	$	78	$	—	$	—	$	1,949
Related party property leases		113		150		150		150		150		163		1,588		2,464
Less: Amounts representing interest																(601	)
Total obligations under capital leases															$	3,812

The Company also enters into gaming device placement contracts in the form of participation and revenue share agreements. Under revenue share agreements, the Company pays the business location a percentage of the gaming revenue generated from the Company’s gaming devices placed at the location, rather than a fixed monthly rental fee. Under participation agreements, the business location holds the applicable gaming license and retains a percentage of the gaming revenue that it generates from the Company’s gaming devices. During the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2017, the total contingent payments recognized by the Company (recorded in gaming expenses) under revenue share and participation agreements were $34.8 million, including $0.3 million under revenue share and participation agreements with related parties, as described in Note 12, Related Party Transactions. During the three months ended March 31, 2016, the total contingent payments recognized by the Company (recorded in gaming expenses) under revenue share and participation agreements were ~~$33.2 million and $94.1 million, respectively, including $0.6 million and $1.6 million, respectively, under revenue share and participation agreements with related parties, as described in Note 14,~~ ~~Related Party Transactions~~. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, the total contingent payments recognized by the Company (recorded in gaming expenses) under revenue share and participation agreements were $16.2$28.2 million, including ~~$0.2~~$0.5 million under revenue share and participation agreements with related parties.

The Company also enters into amusement device and ATM placement contracts in the form of revenue share agreements. Under these revenue share agreements, the Company pays the business location a percentage of the non-gaming revenue generated from the Company’s amusement devices and ATMs placed at the location. During the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2017 and 2016, the total contingent payments recognized by the Company (recorded in other operating expenses) for amusement devices and ATMs under such agreements were ~~$0.3~~$0.4 million and ~~$0.7~~$0.1 million, respectively.

The Company has entered into at-will employment agreements with each of the Company’s executive officers. Under each employment agreement, in addition to the executive’s annual base salary, the executive is entitled to participate in the Company’s incentive compensation programs applicable to executive officers of the Company. The executives are also eligible to participate in all health benefits, insurance programs, pension and retirement plans and other employee benefit and compensation arrangements. Each executive is also provided with other benefits as set forth in his employment agreement. In the event of a termination without “cause” or a “constructive termination” of the Company’s executive officers (as defined in their respective employment agreements), the Company could be liable for estimated severance payments of up to $8.9 million for Mr. Sartini, $3.3 million for Stephen A. Arcana, $3.9 million for Charles H. Protell, $2.2 million for Sean T. Higgins, $1.4 million for Blake L. Sartini II, and $0.5 million for Gary A. Vecchiarelli (assuming each officer’s respective annual salary and health benefit costs as of March 31, 2017 are the amounts in effect at the time of termination and excluding potential expense related to acceleration of stock options).

From time to time, the Company is involved in a variety of lawsuits, claims, investigations and other legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business, including proceedings concerning labor and employment matters, personal injury claims, breach of contract claims, commercial disputes, business practices, intellectual property, tax and other matters.business. Although lawsuits, claims, investigations and other legal proceedings are inherently uncertain and their results cannot be predicted with certainty, the Company believes that the resolution of its currently pending matters will not have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition, results of operations or liquidity. ~~Regardless~~In addition, it is possible that an unfavorable resolution of one or more such proceedings could in the future materially and adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations or liquidity in a particular period.

In February and April 2017, several former employees filed two separate purported class action lawsuits against the Company in the District Court of Clark County, Nevada, and on behalf of similarly situated individuals employed by the Company in the State of Nevada. The lawsuits allege the Company violated certain Nevada labor laws including payment of an hourly wage below the statutory minimum wage without providing a qualified health insurance plan and an associated failure to pay proper overtime

compensation. The complaints seek, on behalf of the ~~outcome,~~plaintiffs and members of the putative class, an unspecified amount of damages (including punitive damages), injunctive and equitable relief, and an award of attorneys’ fees, interest and costs. These cases are at an early stage in the proceedings, and the Company is therefore unable to make a reasonable estimate of the probable loss or range of losses, if any, that might arise from these matters. Therefore, the Company has not recorded any amount for the claims as of the date of this filing. While legal proceedings are inherently unpredictable and no assurance can be given as to the ultimate outcome of these matters, based on management’s current understanding of the relevant facts and circumstances, the Company believes that these proceedings should not have ana material adverse ~~impact~~effect on the ~~Company because~~Company’s financial position, results of ~~defense costs, diversion of management resources and other factors.~~operations or cash flows.

~~During the third quarter of 2015, the~~The Company ~~redefined its reportable segments to reflect the change in its business following the Merger. As a result of the Merger, the Company now~~ conducts its business through two reportable operating segments: Distributed Gaming and Casinos. Prior to the Merger, the Company conducted its business through the following two segments: Rocky Gap and Other. Prior period information has been recast to reflect the new segment structure and present comparative year-over-year results.

The Company’s Distributed Gaming segment involves the installation, maintenance and operation of gaming and amusement devices in certain strategic, high-traffic, non-casino locations (such as grocery stores, convenience stores, restaurants, bars, taverns, saloons and liquor stores) in Nevada and Montana, and the operation of traditional, branded taverns targeting local patrons, primarily in the greater Las Vegas, Nevada metropolitan area. The Company’s Casinos segment includes results of operations and assets related to Rocky Gap in Flintstone, Maryland and its three casino properties in Pahrump, Nevada. The Corporate and Other segment includes the Company’s cash and cash equivalents ~~short-term investments, cost method investments~~ and corporate overhead. Costs recorded in the Corporate and Other segment have not been allocated to the Company’s reportable operating segments because these costs are not easily allocable and to do so would not be practical. ~~Amounts in the Eliminations column represent the intercompany management fee for Rocky Gap.~~

																Three months ended March 31, 2017
(In thousands)																Distributed Gaming			Casinos			Corporate and Other			Eliminations			Consolidated
Net revenues																$	82,259		$	24,308		$	79		$	—		$	106,646

Adjusted EBITDA																	13,106			6,302			(5,839	)		—			13,569
Share-based compensation																	—			—			(1,427	)		—			(1,427	)
Preopening expenses																	(209	)		—			(63	)		—			(272	)
Depreciation and amortization																	(4,634	)		(1,571	)		(347	)		—			(6,552	)
Income (loss) from operations																	8,263			4,731			(7,676	)		—			5,318
Non-operating income (expense)
Interest expense, net																	(42	)		(4	)		(1,637	)		—			(1,683	)
Total non-operating expense, net																	(42	)		(4	)		(1,637	)		—			(1,683	)
Income (loss) before income tax benefit (provision)																	8,221			4,727			(9,313	)		—			3,635
Income tax benefit (provision)																	—			—			1,707			—			1,707
Net income (loss)																$	8,221		$	4,727		$	(7,606	)	$	—		$	5,342
	Distributed Gaming			Casinos			Corporate and Other			Eliminations			Consolidated
	(In thousands)															As of March 31, 2017
Three months ended September 30, 2016
Net revenues	$	78,253		$	25,909		$	64		$	—		$	104,226
Depreciation and amortization expense		(4,871	)		(2,034	)		(318	)		—			(7,223	)
Income (loss) from operations		4,961			4,477			(6,356	)		—			3,082
Interest expense, net		(43	)		(3	)		(1,643	)		—			(1,689	)

Three months ended September 30, 2015
Net revenues	$	40,331		$	22,133		$	598		$	(550	)	$	62,512
Management fee revenue (expense)		—			(550	)		550	��		—			—
Depreciation and amortization expense		(2,952	)		(1,882	)		(266	)		—			(5,100	)
Income (loss) from operations		2,204			2,662			(12,618	)		—			(7,752	)
Interest expense, net		(28	)		(89	)		(863	)		—			(980	)

Nine months ended September 30, 2016
Net revenues	$	224,602		$	73,031		$	185		$	—		$	297,818
Depreciation and amortization expense		(13,166	)		(5,720	)		(976	)		—			(19,862	)
Income (loss) from operations		17,258			12,398			(17,786	)		—			11,870
Interest expense, net		(118	)		(4	)		(4,664	)		—			(4,786	)

Nine months ended September 30, 2015
Net revenues	$	40,331		$	50,138		$	1,505		$	(1,367	)	$	90,607
Management fee revenue (expense)		—			(1,367	)		1,367			—			—
Impairments and other losses		—			—			(682	)		—			(682	)
Depreciation and amortization expense		(2,952	)		(3,603	)		(304	)		—			(6,859	)
Income (loss) from operations		2,204			4,635			(15,916	)		—			(9,077	)
Interest expense, net		(28	)		(626	)		(769	)		—			(1,423	)

As of September 30, 2016
Total assets	$	287,282		$	105,723		$	15,323		$	—		$	408,328		$	300,128		$	105,638		$	66,478		$	(53,398	)	$	418,846

As of December 31, 2015
Total assets	$	221,596		$	112,962		$	44,226		$	—		$	378,784

	Three months ended March 31, 2016
(In thousands)	Distributed Gaming			Casinos			Corporate and Other			Eliminations			Consolidated
Net revenues	$	68,584		$	22,413		$	37		$	—		$	91,034

Adjusted EBITDA		10,221			4,764			(4,437	)		—			10,548
Merger expenses		—			—			(41	)		—			(41	)
Share-based compensation		—			—			(405	)		—			(405	)
Depreciation and amortization		(3,699	)		(1,769	)		(324	)		—			(5,792	)
Other operating items, net		(560	)		—			(13	)		—			(573	)
Income (loss) from operations		5,962			2,995			(5,220	)		—			3,737
Non-operating income (expense)
Interest expense, net		(35	)		—			(1,422	)		—			(1,457	)
Loss on extinguishment of debt		—			—			—			—			—
Other, net		—			—			18			—			18
Total non-operating expense, net		(35	)		—			(1,404	)		—			(1,439	)
Income (loss) before income tax benefit (provision)		5,927			2,995			(6,624	)		—			2,298
Income tax benefit (provision)		—			—			(59	)		—			(59	)
Net income (loss)	$	5,927		$	2,995		$	(6,683	)	$	—		$	2,239

	As of December 31, 2016
Total assets	$	294,822		$	108,418		$	69,236		$	(53,398	)	$	419,078

As of ~~September 30, 2016,~~March 31, 2017, the Company leased its office headquarters building and one tavern location from a company 33% beneficially owned by Blake L. Sartini, ~~and 3% beneficially~~5% owned ~~by Stephen A. Arcana, and leased four tavern locations from companies owned or controlled by Mr. Sartini or~~ by a trust for the benefit of Mr. Sartini’s immediate family members (including Blake L. Sartini, II) for which Mr. Sartini serves as trustee, and 3% beneficially owned by Stephen A. Arcana, and leased three tavern locations, one of which the Company accounts for as a capital lease, from companies controlled by Mr. Sartini through a trust for the benefit of Mr. Sartini’s immediate family members (including Blake L. Sartini, II) for which Mr. Sartini serves as trustee. ~~In addition, two tavern locations that the Company leased from related parties were divested by those related parties during the first quarter of 2016.~~ The lease for the Company’s office headquarters building expires on July 31, ~~2025,~~2025. The rent expense for the office headquarters building during each of the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 was $0.3 million and there was no amount owed by the Company with respect to such lease as of March 31, 2017. The leases for the tavern locations have remaining terms of up to 1015 years. ~~Rent~~The rent expense for the tavern locations during the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2017 and 2016 was $0.3 million and ~~$0.8~~$0.4 million, respectively, ~~for~~and no amounts were owed by the ~~office headquarters building and $0.3 million and $1.0 million, respectively, in the aggregate for~~Company with respect to such ~~tavern locations.~~leases as of March 31, 2017. Additionally, a portion of the office headquarters building iswas sublet to a company owned or controlled by Mr. ~~Sartini.~~Sartini through February 28, 2017. Rental income ~~during each of the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016~~ for

the sublet portion of the office headquarters building during each of the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 was less than $0.1 million. Less than $0.1 million was owed to the Company, and no amounts were due and payable by the Company, as of September 30, 2016 under the leases of such tavern locations and the lease of the office headquarters building. Less than $0.1 million was owed to the Company under the sublease of the office headquarters building. Mr. Sartini serves as the Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and is co-trustee of the Sartini Trust, which is a significant shareholder of the Company. Mr. Arcana serves as the Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company. ~~All~~As of March 31, 2017, all of these related party lease agreements were in place prior to the consummation of the ~~Merger.~~Merger, other than two lease agreements entered into in 2016.

~~From time to time, the Company’s executive officers and employees use a private aircraft owned by Sartini Enterprises, Inc., a company controlled by Mr. Sartini, for Company business.~~ In April 2016, the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors approved the Company’s entering into an aircraft timesharing agreement between the Company and Sartini Enterprises, Inc. ~~pursuant~~, a company controlled by Mr. Sartini. Pursuant to ~~which~~the agreement, the Company will reimburse Sartini Enterprises, Inc. for direct costs and expenses incurred ~~for travel~~by Company employees traveling on Company business on the private aircraft owned by ~~Company employees while on Company business. The aircraft timesharing agreement specifies the maximum expense reimbursement that~~ Sartini Enterprises Inc. can charge the Company under the applicable regulations of the Federal Aviation Administration for the use of the aircraft and flight crew. Such costs include fuel, landing fees, hangar and tie-down costs away from the aircraft’s operating base, flight planning and weather contract services, crew costs and other related expenses. The Company’s compliance department regularly reviews these reimbursements. During the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2016,~~March 31, 2017, the Company paid less than $0.1 million, and as of ~~September 30, 2016~~March 31, 2017 the Company owed less than $0.1 million, under the aircraft timesharing agreement.

Mr. Sartini’s son, Blake L. Sartini, II (“Mr. Sartini II”), ~~joined the Company~~serves as Senior Vice President of Distributed Gaming ~~in connection with~~of the ~~Merger.~~Company. Mr. Sartini II has an employment agreement that was approved by both the Audit Committee and Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors, which was amended and restated in March 2017. The amended and restated employment agreement provides for an annual base salary of ~~$275,000,~~$375,000, of which approximately ~~$217,000~~$79,000 was earned during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2016.~~March 31, 2017. Additionally, Mr. Sartini II is eligible for a target annual bonus equal to ~~35%~~50% of his base ~~salary, and received a discretionary bonus of $30,000 during the first quarter of 2016 attributable to his performance in 2015.~~salary. Mr. Sartini II also participates in the Company's equity award and benefit programs. In ~~August 2016,~~2017, Mr. Sartini II received a grant of ~~70,000~~75,000 options to purchase the Company’s

common stock with an exercise price of ~~$12.51~~$13.50 per share, which stock options will vest over a four-year period (but pursuant to the 2015 Plan such stock options may not be exercised prior to August 1, 2018 except in limited circumstances).

One of the distributed gaming locations at which the Company’s gaming devices are located is owned in part by Sean T. Higgins, who serves as the Company’s Chief Legal Officer and Executive Vice President of Development, Compliance and Government Affairs. This arrangement was in place prior to Mr. Higgins joining the Company on March 28, 2016. Net revenues and gaming expenses recorded by the Company from the use of the Company’s gaming devices at this location were each $0.3 million during the three months ended March 31, 2017, and an immaterial amount during the three months ended March 31, 2016, as such period predominantly related to the period prior to the commencement of Mr. Higgins’ employment with the Company. No amounts were owed to the Company and no amounts were due and payable by the Company related to this arrangement as of March 31, 2017.

Three of the distributed gaming locations at which the Company’s gaming devices are located are owned in part by the spouse of Matthew W. Flandermeyer, ~~who serves as~~the former Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company. Net revenues and gaming expenses recorded by the Company from the use of the Company’s gaming devices at these three locations were ~~$0.3~~$0.5 million and ~~$0.2~~$0.4 million, respectively, during the three months ended ~~September 30, 2016,~~March 31, 2016. Mr. Flandermeyer ceased to be an employee of the Company and ~~$1.1 million and $1.0 million, respectively, during the nine months ended September 30,~~a related party in November 2016. The gaming expenses recorded by the Company represent amounts retained by the counterparty (with respect to the two locations that are subject to participation agreements) or paid to the counterparty (with respect to the location that is subject to a revenue share agreement) from the operation of the gaming devices. ~~Less than $0.1 million was owed to the Company and no amounts were due and payable by the Company related to these arrangements as of September 30, 2016.~~ All of the agreements were in place prior to the consummation of the Merger.

One of the distributed gaming locations at which the Company’s gaming devices are located is owned in part by Sean T. Higgins, who serves as Executive Vice President and Chief Legal Officer of the Company. This arrangement was in place prior to Mr. Higgins joining the Company on March 28, 2016. Net revenues and gaming expenses recorded by the Company from the use of the Company’s gaming devices at this location was $0.3 million and $0.2 million, respectively, during the three months ended September 30, 2016, and $0.6 million and $0.5 million, respectively, during the nine months ended September 30, 2016, in each case excluding net revenues and gaming expenses incurred during the period prior to the commencement of Mr. Higgins employment with the Company (as during such period the agreement was not with a related party). Less than $0.1 million was owed to the Company and no amounts were due and payable by the Company related to this arrangement as of September 30, 2016.

~~Additionally, one~~ distributed gaming location at which the Company’s gaming devices are located was owned in part by Terrence L. Wright, who serves on the Board of Directors of the Company, who divested his interest in such distributed gaming location in March 2016. Net revenues and gaming expenses recorded by the Company from the use of the Company’s gaming devices at this location during the period in which the agreement was with a related party were $0.1 million during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2016. This agreement was in place prior to the consummation of the Merger.

In connection with the Merger, Lyle A. Berman, who serves on the Board of the Directors of the Company, entered into a three-year consulting agreement with the Company that pays his wholly owned consulting firm $200,000 annually, plus reimbursements for certain health insurance, administrative assistant and office costs. Expenses recorded by the Company for the agreement with Mr. Berman were $0.1 million for each of the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, and no amounts were due and payable by the Company at March 31, 2017.

Additionally, in connection with the Merger, Timothy J. Cope, who serves on the Board of Directors of the Company entered into a short-term consulting agreement for the period from July 31, 2015 to April 1, 2016 under which Mr. Cope was paid a total of $140,000, plus reimbursement of certain health insurance costs. Expenses recorded by the Company for the agreement with Mr. Cope were $0.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2016.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

As used in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, unless the context suggests otherwise, the terms “Golden,” “we,” “our” and “us” refer to Golden Entertainment, Inc. and its subsidiaries.

The following information should be read in conjunction with the unaudited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, including Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, contains forward-looking statements regarding future events and our future results that are subject to the safe harbors created under the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or the Exchange Act. Forward-looking statements can generally be identified by the use of words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “continue,” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “forecast,” “intend,” “plan,” “project,” “seek,” “should,” “think,” “will,” “would” and similar expressions. In addition, forward-looking statements include statements regarding our strategies, objectives, business opportunities and plans for future expansion, developments or acquisitions, anticipated future growth and trends in our business or key markets, projections of future financial condition, operating results, income, capital expenditures, costs or other financial items, anticipated regulatory and legislative changes, our ability to utilize our net operating loss carryforwards (“NOLs”) to offset future taxable income, as well as other statements that are not statements of historical fact. Forward-looking statements are based on our current expectations and assumptions regarding our business, the economy and other future conditions. These forward-looking statements are subject to assumptions, risks and uncertainties that may change at any time, and readers are therefore cautioned that actual results could differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause actual results to differ include: our ability to realize the anticipated cost savings, synergies and other benefits of the ~~Merger (as defined below) with~~2015 acquisition of Sartini Gaming, Inc. ~~(“Sartini Gaming”~~through a merger transaction (the “Merger”), and the acquisitions of distributed gaming assets in Montana, and integration risks relating to such transactions, changes in national, regional and local economic and market conditions, legislative and regulatory matters (including the cost of compliance or failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations), increases in gaming taxes and fees in the jurisdictions in which we operate, litigation, increased competition, our ability to renew our distributed gaming contracts, reliance on key personnel (including our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Operating Officer, Chief Strategy Officer and Chief Financial Officer), the level of our indebtedness and our ability to comply with covenants in our debt instruments, terrorist incidents, natural disasters, severe weather conditions (including weather or road conditions that limit access to our properties), the effects of environmental and structural building conditions, the effects of disruptions to our information technology and other systems and infrastructure, the occurrence of an “ownership change” as defined in Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”), factors affecting the gaming, entertainment and hospitality industries generally, and other factors identified under the heading “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K and in Part II, Item 1A of this report, elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and in our other filings with the SEC. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the filing date of this report. We undertake no obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statements for any reason.

We are a diversified group of gaming companies that focus on distributed gaming (including tavern gaming) and casino and resort operations.

On July 31, 2015, we acquired Sartini Gaming through the merger of a wholly owned subsidiary of Golden with and into Sartini Gaming, with Sartini Gaming surviving as a wholly owned subsidiary of Golden (the “Merger”). The results of operations of Sartini Gaming and its subsidiaries have been included in our results subsequent to that date.

On October 28, 2015, our Board of Directors approved a change in our fiscal year from a 52- or 53-week fiscal year ending on the Sunday closest to December 31 of each year to a calendar year ending on December 31, effective as of the beginning of the third quarter of 2015. As a result of this change, our fiscal quarters for 2015 ended on March 29, 2015, June 28, 2015, September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2015. From and after January 1, 2016, our fiscal quarters end on March 31, June 30, September 30 and December 31.

~~During the third quarter of 2015, we redefined our reportable segments to reflect the change in our business following the Merger. As a result of the Merger, we now~~We conduct our business through two reportable operating segments: Distributed Gaming and Casinos. ~~Prior to the Merger, we conducted our business through the following two segments: Rocky Gap and Other. Prior period information~~

~~has been recast to reflect the new segment structure and present comparative year-over-year results. See Note 13,~~ ~~Segment Information, in the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements for financial information regarding our segments.~~

Our Distributed Gaming segment involves the installation, maintenance and operation of gaming and amusement devices in certain strategic, high-traffic, non-casino locations (such as grocery stores, convenience stores, restaurants, bars, taverns, saloons and liquor stores) in Nevada and Montana, and the operation of traditional, branded taverns targeting local patrons, primarily in the greater Las Vegas, Nevada metropolitan area. As of ~~September 30, 2016,~~March 31, 2017, our distributed gaming operations comprised over ~~10,400~~10,300 gaming devices in approximately ~~980~~960 locations.

On January 29, 2016, we completed the acquisition of approximately 1,100 gaming devices from a distributed gaming operator in Montana, as well as certain other non-gaming assets and the right to operate within certain locations (the “Initial Montana Acquisition”). Additionally, on April 22, 2016, we completed the acquisition of approximately 1,800 gaming devices from a second distributed gaming operator in Montana, as well as amusement devices and other non-gaming assets and the right to operate within certain locations (the “Second Montana Acquisition” and, together with the Initial Montana Acquisition, the “Montana Acquisitions”); see Note 2, ~~Merger and Acquisitions, in the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements for information regarding the Montana Acquisitions.~~

Nevada law limits distributed gaming operations (commonly known as “restricted gaming” operations) to certain types of non-casino locations, including grocery stores, drug stores, convenience stores, restaurants, bars, taverns, saloons and liquor ~~stores. Most~~stores, where gaming is incidental to the primary business being conducted at the location and games are limited to 15 or fewer gaming devices and no other

forms of gaming activity. The gaming area in these business locations ~~are restricted to offering no more than 15~~is typically small, and in many instances, segregated from the primary business area, including the use of alcoves in grocery stores and drug stores and installation of gaming devices into the physical bar (more commonly known as “bar top” gaming devices) in bars, taverns and saloons. Such segregation provides greater oversight and supervision of the gaming devices. Under Montana law, distributed gaming operations are limited to business locations licensed to sell alcoholic beverages for on-premises consumption only, with such locations restricted to offering a maximum of 20 gaming devices.

Gaming and amusement devices are placed in locations where we believe they will receive maximum customer traffic, generally near a store’s entrance. In Nevada, we generally enter into three types of gaming device placement contracts as part of our distributed gaming business: space lease, revenue share and participation agreements. Under space lease agreements, we pay a fixed monthly rental fee for the right to install, maintain and operate our gaming devices at a business location. Under revenue share agreements, we pay the business location a percentage of the gaming revenue generated from our gaming devices placed at the location, rather than a fixed monthly rental fee. With regard to both space lease and revenue share agreements, we hold the applicable gaming license to conduct gaming at the location (although revenue share locations are required to obtain separate regulatory approval to receive a percentage of the gaming revenue). Under participation agreements, the business location holds the applicable gaming license and retains a percentage of the gaming revenue that it generates from our gaming devices. In Montana, our gaming and amusement device placement contracts are all revenue share agreements.

Our branded taverns offer a casually upscale environment catering to local patrons offering superior food, beer and other alcoholic beverages, and typically include 15 onsite gaming devices. As of ~~September 30, 2016,~~March 31, 2017, we operated 5254 taverns, which offered a total of ~~824~~approximately 860 onsite gaming devices. Most of our taverns are located in the greater Las Vegas, Nevada metropolitan area and cater to locals seeking to avoid the congestion of the Las Vegas Strip. Our tavern brands include PT’s Pub, PT’s Gold, PT’s Place, PT’s Brewing Company, Sierra Gold, SG Bar and Sean Patrick’s. Our taverns also serve as an incubator for new games and technology that can then be rolled out to our third party distributed gaming customers within the segment and to our Casinos segment. We also opened our first brewery in Las Vegas, PT’s Brewing Company, during the first quarter of 2016 to produce craft beer for our taverns and casinos, as well as other establishments licensed to sell liquor for on-premises consumption.

We own and operate the Rocky Gap Casino Resort in Flintstone, Maryland (“Rocky Gap”) and ~~as a result of the Merger,~~ three casinos in Pahrump, Nevada: Pahrump Nugget Hotel Casino (“Pahrump Nugget”), Gold Town Casino and Lakeside Casino & RV Park. Pahrump is located approximately 60 miles from Las Vegas and is a gateway to Death Valley National Park. All of our casinos emphasize gaming device play.

Rocky Gap is situated on approximately 270 acres in the Rocky Gap State Park, which are leased from the Maryland Department of Natural Resources under a 40-year operating ground lease expiring in 2052 (plus a 20-year option renewal). As of ~~September 30, 2016,~~March 31, 2017, Rocky Gap offered ~~634~~662 gaming devices, 1718 table games, two casino bars, three restaurants, a spa and the only Jack Nicklaus signature golf course in Maryland. Rocky Gap is a AAA Four Diamond Award® winning resort with approximately 200 hotel rooms, as well as an event and conference center.

As of ~~September 30, 2016,~~March 31, 2017, our Pahrump Nugget casino offered ~~470~~449 gaming devices, as well as 11 table games (which include three live poker tables), a race and sports book, a 208-seat bingo facility and a bowling center. Pahrump Nugget is ~~a AAA Two Diamond~~

~~Award® winning hotel~~our largest property in the Nevada market with approximately 70 hotel rooms. As of ~~September 30, 2016,~~March 31, 2017, our Gold Town Casino offered ~~274~~237 gaming devices and a 125-seat bingo facility, and our Lakeside Casino & RV Park offered ~~193~~189 gaming devices and a recreational vehicle park surrounding a lake with approximately 160 RV hook-up sites.

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the unaudited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2016~~March 31, 2017 and ~~September 30, 2015.~~2016.

																			Three Months Ended						Increase (Decrease)
(In thousands)																			March 31, 2017			March 31, 2016			From Prior Year
Net revenues
Distributed Gaming																			$	82,259		$	68,584		$	13,675
Casinos																				24,308			22,413			1,895
Corporate and other																				79			37			42
	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended						Increase (Decrease) From Prior Year							106,646			91,034			15,612
	September 30, 2016			September 30, 2015			September 30, 2016			September 30, 2015			Three Months Ended			Nine Months Ended
	(In thousands)
Net Revenues
Operating expenses
Distributed Gaming	$	78,253		$	40,331		$	224,602		$	40,331		$	37,922		$	184,271			63,092			52,703			10,389
Casinos		25,909			22,133			73,031			50,138			3,776			22,893			12,915			11,934			981
Corporate and Other		64			48			185			138			16			47
		104,226			62,512			297,818			90,607			41,714			207,211

Operating Expenses
Distributed Gaming		61,647			31,618			174,725			31,618			30,029			143,107
Casinos		13,832			11,950			38,849			28,007			1,882			10,842
Corporate and Other		30			—			77			—			30			77
Corporate and other																				(5	)		20			(25	)
		75,509			43,568			213,651			59,625			31,941			154,026			76,002			64,657			11,345
Selling, general and administrative		17,816			12,134			50,272			22,542			5,682			27,730			18,502			16,234			2,268
Merger expenses		139			9,325			614			10,591			(9,186	)		(9,977	)		—			41			(41	)
(Gain) loss on disposal of property and equipment		(344	)		8			(344	)		6			(352	)		(350	)
Gain on sale of cost method investment		—			—			—			(750	)		—			750
Preopening expenses		801			129			1,893			129			672			1,764			272			573			(301	)
Impairments and other losses		—			—			—			682			—			(682	)
Depreciation and amortization		7,223			5,100			19,862			6,859			2,123			13,003			6,552			5,792			760
Total expenses		101,144			70,264			285,948			99,684			30,880			186,264			101,328			87,297			14,031
Income (loss) from operations		3,082			(7,752	)		11,870			(9,077	)		10,834			20,947
Income from operations																				5,318			3,737			1,581
Non-operating expense, net		(1,689	)		(2,104	)		(4,768	)		(2,511	)		415			(2,257	)		(1,683	)		(1,439	)		(244	)
Income tax benefit (provision)		(91	)		12,874			(761	)		12,702			(12,965	)		(13,463	)		1,707			(59	)		1,766
Net income	$	1,302		$	3,018		$	6,341		$	1,114		$	(1,716	)	$	5,227		$	5,342		$	2,239		$	3,103

Three Months Ended ~~September 30, 2016~~March 31, 2017 Compared to Three Months Ended ~~September 30, 2015~~March 31, 2016

The increase in net revenues resulted primarily from the completion of the Merger on July 31, 2015, which resulted in the inclusion of net revenues related to Sartini Gaming’s distributed gaming and casino businesses for only 61 days of the prior year period. Net revenues related to Sartini Gaming’s distributed gaming and casino businesses were $63.1 million and $7.9 million, respectively, during the three months ended September 30, 2016, compared to $40.3 million and $5.2 million, respectively, for the prior year period. Net revenues related to our Distributed Gaming segment for the three months ended September 30, 2016 also included $15.1 million of net revenues from the operations of the distributed gaming businesses acquired in the Montana Acquisitions, which were consummated in 2016.

In addition to the incremental net revenues provided by the Merger and the Montana Acquisitions during the current year quarter, our Casinos segment also reflected an increase of approximately $1.1 million in net revenues during the current year quarter related to our Rocky Gap casino compared to the prior year ~~period.~~period was primarily due to a $13.0 million and $2.3 million increase in our gaming and food and beverage revenues, respectively.

The increase in net revenues related to our Distributing Gaming segment compared to the prior year period was primarily due to an increase of $11.2 million in gaming revenues (reflecting the opening of five new taverns in the Las Vegas Valley after the first quarter of 2016), as well as inclusion in the current year period of net revenues relating to our acquisition of gaming devices, certain other non-gaming assets and the right to operate within certain locations from a distributed gaming operator in Montana (the “Initial Montana Acquisition”) on January 29, 2016, and our additional acquisition of gaming devices, amusement devices, certain other non-gaming assets and the right to operate within certain locations from a second distributed gaming operator in Montana (the “Second Montana Acquisition”, and, together with the Initial Montana Acquisitions, the “Montana Acquisitions”) on April 22, 2016.

The increase in net revenues related to our Casinos Segment compared to the prior year period was primarily due to an increase of $1.5 million in gaming revenues at our Rocky Gap casino, reflecting an increase in parking capacity to accommodate peak days, increased patron volume and revised marketing efforts to cater to our gaming customers. The year-over-year gaming revenue increases were partially offset by a decrease in food and beverage revenues.

The increase in operating expenses compared to the prior year period resulted primarily from the ~~completion of the Merger on July 31, 2015, which resulted~~inclusion in the ~~inclusion~~current year period of $12.8 million in operating expenses ~~related~~relating to ~~Sartini Gaming’s distributed gaming and casino~~the businesses ~~for only 61 days of~~acquired in the prior year period. Operating expenses related to Sartini Gaming’s distributed gaming and casino businesses were $49.2 million and $4.0 million, respectively, during the three months ended September 30, 2016, compared to $31.6 million and $2.7 million, respectively, for the prior year period.Montana Acquisitions in 2016. Operating expenses comprise gaming, food and beverage, rooms and other operating expenses.

~~Selling,~~The increase in selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) expenses ~~increased due primarily~~compared to ~~the completion of the Merger on July 31, 2015, which resulted in the inclusion of SG&A expenses related to Sartini Gaming’s distributed gaming and casino businesses for only 61 days of~~ the prior year ~~period.~~

~~For the three months ended September 30, 2016, SG&A~~period resulted primarily from increases of $2.1 million in salaries and bonus expenses ~~included payroll and related expenses of $6.8 million~~ (including share-based compensation expense), and $0.6 million in building

and rent expense, which were partially offset by decreases of $0.3 million in professional fees and $0.2 million in marketing and advertising ~~expenses of $0.9 million, building and rent expense of $5.3 million and professional fees of $1.3 million.~~expenses. Share-based compensation expense increased during the current year quarter due primarily to ~~$0.1~~$0.4 million of expense related to a restricted stock unit award granted in November of 2016 and $0.2 million of additional expense related to the ~~0.9~~approximately 0.8 million stock options granted during the current year period, $0.2 million in incremental expense related to the acceleration of unvested stock options related to a terminated employee and $0.8 million of incremental expense recorded for the equitable anti-dilutive adjustments made to the exercise prices of outstanding vested and unvested stock options during the period in accordance with our equity incentive plans. See Note 8, ~~Share-Based Compensation~~, in the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements for additional information regarding our equity incentive plans and the equitable anti-dilutive adjustments made to outstanding stock options during the current year period. For the three months ended September 30, 2015, SG&A expenses included payroll and related expensesthird quarter of $4.6 million (including share-based compensation expense), marketing and advertising expenses of $0.9 million, building and rent expense of $3.8 million and professional fees of $1.0 million. For the three months ended September 30, 2016, corporate-level SG&A was $6.1 million, compared to $3.6 million in the prior year period.2016.

Within our Distributed Gaming segment, SG&A expenses were $6.1 million for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2016,~~March 31, 2017, compared to ~~$3.4~~$5.7 million for the prior year period.

Within our Casinos segment, SG&A expenses were ~~$5.6~~$5.1 million for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2016,~~March 31, 2017, compared to ~~$5.1~~$5.7 million for the prior year period. The ~~increase resulted~~$0.6 million change was primarily ~~from the completion of the Merger on July 31, 2015, which resulted~~due to decreases in ~~the inclusion of approximately $2.0 million of~~utility, business tax and insurance expenses. SG&A expenses ~~related~~relating to ~~Sartini Gaming’s~~our Rocky Gap casino ~~business during~~were $3.3 million for the ~~current year quarter,~~three months ended March 31, 2017 compared to ~~$1.4~~$3.5 million for the prior year period. The decrease in SG&A expenses at Rocky Gap was primarily the result of cost reduction efforts in payroll, professional fees and other related costs.

~~We incurred approximately $0.1 million~~Preopening expenses consist of labor, food, utilities, training, rent and ~~$9.3 million in transaction-related~~organizational costs associated with the Merger and our obligations under the Sartini Gaming merger agreement for the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Merger expenses consisted primarily of financial advisor, legal, accounting and consulting costs.

~~We incurred approximately $0.8 million in preopening expenses primarily~~incurred. Non-capital costs associated with the opening of ~~new taverns during~~tavern and casino locations are also expensed as preopening expenses as incurred. During the three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2017, preopening expenses were $0.3 million, which related primarily to the opening of new taverns in Las Vegas, Nevada. During the three months ended March 31, 2016, ~~compared~~preopening expenses were $0.6 million, which related primarily to ~~approximately $0.1 million during~~costs incurred in connection with the ~~prior year period.~~Initial Montana Acquisition and the opening of new tavern locations in Las Vegas, Nevada.

~~Depreciation~~The $0.8 million increase in depreciation and amortization expenses compared to the prior year period was ~~$5.3~~primarily due to the depreciation of the assets and the amortization of the intangibles acquired in the Montana Acquisitions.

Non-operating expense, net was $1.7 million for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2016,~~March 31, 2017 compared to $5.1 million for the prior year period. Amortization of intangibles was $2.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2016, which primarily related to intangible assets acquired in the Merger and the Montana Acquisitions, compared to less than $0.1$1.4 million for the prior year period. The increase in ~~amortization was due primarily to amortization of the intangibles acquired pursuant to the Merger, as well as intangibles acquired in the Montana Acquisitions.~~

~~The decrease in~~ non-operating expense, net was due primarily to ~~the inclusion~~a year-over-year increase in ~~the prior year period of $1.2 million related to a loss on extinguishment of debt. This was partially offset by higher~~ interest expense ~~during the current year quarter compared to the prior year period due~~related to higher outstanding borrowings under our senior secured credit agreement with Capital One, National Association (as administrative agent) and the Credit Agreement we entered into on July 31, 2015 in connection with the Merger. The prior year period included interest under the Credit Agreement for the period following the Merger as well as interest on a lower outstanding principal balance under a prior credit facility that was discharged in connection with the Merger.lenders named therein (the “Credit Agreement”).

Income tax ~~expense~~benefit was $1.7 million for the three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2017, which resulted primarily from the partial release of deferred tax asset valuation allowances. Income tax expense was less than $0.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2016, which was ~~$0.1 million,~~ attributed primarily to tax amortization of indefinite-lived ~~intangibles and measurement period adjustments to goodwill. Income~~intangibles. Our effective tax ~~benefit~~rate was ~~$12.9 million~~-46.4% for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2015,~~March 31, 2017, which ~~was related~~differed from the federal tax rate of 35% due primarily to the partial release of ~~an existing~~the valuation allowance ~~resulting from the assumption of a $12.7 million net~~against our deferred tax ~~liability generated from intangible assets acquired in the Merger.~~assets. Our effective tax rate ~~was 6.5%~~ for the three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2016 was 2.5%, which differed from the federal tax rate of 35% due primarily to changes in the valuation allowance for deferred tax assets. Our effective tax rate for the three months ended September 30, 2015 was (130.6)%, which differed from the federal tax rate of 35% due primarily to the $12.7 million release of an existing valuation allowance and the limitation of the income tax benefit due to the uncertainty of its future realization.

~~Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015~~

The increase in net revenues resulted primarily from the completion of the Merger on July 31, 2015, which resulted in the inclusion of net revenues related to Sartini Gaming’s distributed gaming and casino businesses for only 61 days of the prior year period. Net revenues related to Sartini Gaming’s distributed gaming and casino businesses were $192.5 million and $25.3 million, respectively, during the nine months ended September 30, 2016, compared to $40.3 million and $5.2 million, respectively, for the prior year period. Net revenues related to our Distributed Gaming segment for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 also included $32.0 million of net revenues from the operations of the distributed gaming businesses acquired in the Montana Acquisitions, which were consummated in 2016.

In addition to the incremental net revenues provided by the Merger and the Montana Acquisitions during the current year period, our Casinos segment also reflected an increase of approximately $2.8 million in net revenues during the current year period related to our Rocky Gap casino compared to the prior year period.

The increase in operating expenses resulted primarily from the completion of the Merger on July 31, 2015, which resulted in the inclusion of operating expenses related to Sartini Gaming’s distributed gaming and casino businesses for only 61 days of the prior year period. Operating expenses related to Sartini Gaming’s distributed gaming and casino businesses were $149.1 million and $12.4 million, respectively, for the nine months ended September 30, 2016, compared to $31.6 million and $2.7 million, respectively, for the prior year period.

SG&A expenses increased due primarily to the completion of the Merger on July 31, 2015, which resulted in the inclusion of SG&A expenses related to Sartini Gaming’s distributed gaming and casino businesses for only 61 days of the prior year period.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2016, SG&A expenses included payroll and related expenses of $18.7 million (including share-based compensation expense), marketing and advertising expenses of $2.4 million, building and rent expense of $15.5 million and professional fees of $3.8 million. Share-based compensation expense increased during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 due primarily to $0.3 million of additional expense related to the 1.1 million stock options granted during the current year period, $0.2 million in incremental expense related to the acceleration of unvested stock options related to a terminated employee and $0.8 million of incremental expense recorded for the equitable anti-dilutive adjustments made to the exercise prices of outstanding vested and unvested stock options during the current year period in accordance with our equity incentive plans. See Note 8, ~~Share-Based Compensation~~, in the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements for additional information regarding our equity incentive plans and the equitable anti-dilutive adjustments made to outstanding stock options during the current year period. For the nine months ended September 30, 2015, SG&A expenses included payroll and related expenses of $10.3 million (including share-based compensation expense), marketing and advertising expenses of $2.1 million, building and rent expense of $5.1 million and

~~professional fees of $2.1 million. For the nine months ended September 30, 2016, corporate-level SG&A was $16.4 million, compared to $6.6 million in the prior year period.~~

~~Within our Distributed Gaming segment, SG&A expenses were $17.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016, compared to $3.4 million for the prior year period.~~

Within our Casinos segment, SG&A expenses were $16.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016, compared to $12.5 million for the prior year period. The increase resulted primarily from the completion of the Merger on July 31, 2015, which resulted in the inclusion of approximately $5.7 million of SG&A expenses related to Sartini Gaming’s casino business for the nine months ended September 30, 2016, compared to $1.4 million for the prior year period, partially offset by reductions of $0.8 million related to our Rocky Gap casino.

We incurred approximately $0.6 million and $10.6 million in transaction-related costs associated with the Merger and our obligations under the Sartini Gaming merger agreement during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Merger expenses consisted primarily of financial advisor, legal, accounting and consulting costs.

We incurred approximately $1.9 million in preopening expenses associated with the opening of new taverns and our Montana Acquisitions during the nine months ended September 30, 2016, compared to preopening expenses of $0.1 million associated with the opening of new taverns during the prior year period.

In January 2015, we sold our 10% ownership interest in Rock Ohio Ventures, LLC (“Rock Ohio Ventures”) for approximately $0.8 million. We had previously determined the fair value of our Rock Ohio Ventures investment to be zero. As a result of the sale of our interest in Rock Ohio Ventures, we recognized a gain on sale of cost method investment of approximately $0.8 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2015.

Depreciation was $14.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016, compared to $6.8 million for the prior year period. The increase was due primarily to depreciation of the assets acquired pursuant to the Merger, as well as assets acquired in the Montana Acquisitions. Amortization of intangibles was $5.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016, which primarily related to intangible assets acquired in the Merger and the Montana Acquisitions, compared to $0.1 million for the prior year period.

Non-operating expense, net was $4.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016, compared to $2.5 million for the prior year period. Interest expense was higher during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 due to higher outstanding borrowings under the Credit Agreement we entered into on July 31, 2015 in connection with the Merger. The prior year period included interest both under the Credit Agreement for the 61-day period following the Merger, as well as interest on a lower outstanding principal balance under a prior credit facility that was discharged in connection with the Merger and $1.2 million related to a loss on extinguishment of debt.

Income tax expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 was less than $0.8 million, attributed primarily to tax amortization of indefinite-lived intangibles and measurement period adjustments to goodwill. Income tax benefit was $12.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015, which was related to the release of an existing valuation allowance resulting from the assumption of a $12.7 million net deferred tax liability generated from intangible assets acquired in the Merger. Our effective tax rate was 10.7% for the nine months ended September 30, 2016, which differed from the federal tax rate of 35% due primarily to changes in the valuation allowance for deferred tax assets. Our effective tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 was (109.6)%, which differed from the federal tax rate of 35% due primarily to the $12.7 million release of an existing valuation allowance and the limitation of the income tax benefit due to the uncertainty of its future realization.

As of September 30, 2016, we evaluated all available positive and negative evidence related to our ability to utilize our deferred tax assets. We considered the expected future book income (losses), lack of taxable loss carryback potential and other factors in reaching

the conclusion that the deferred tax assets were not currently expected to be realized, and that therefore the valuation allowance against the deferred tax assets continued to be appropriate as of September 30, 2016.

To supplement our consolidated financial statements presented in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”), we use Adjusted EBITDA, a measure we believe is appropriate to provide meaningful comparison with, and to enhance an overall understanding of, our past financial performance and prospects for the future. We believe Adjusted EBITDA provides useful information to both management and investors by excluding specific expenses and gains that we believe are not indicative of our core operating results. Further, Adjusted EBITDA is a measure of operating performance used by management, as well as industry analysts, to evaluate operations and operating performance and is widely used in the gaming industry. The presentation of this additional information is not meant to be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of financial performance prepared in accordance with GAAP. In addition, other companies in our industry may calculate Adjusted EBITDA differently than we do. A reconciliation of net income to Adjusted EBITDA is provided in the table below.

We define “Adjusted EBITDA” as earnings before interest and other non-operating income (expense), income taxes, depreciation and amortization, preopening expenses, merger expenses, share-based compensation expenses, executive severance and sign-on bonuses, impairments and other gains and losses.

The following table presents a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to net ~~income (unaudited, in thousands):~~income:

	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended						Three Months Ended
	September 30, 2016			September 30, 2015			September 30, 2016			September 30, 2015

(In thousands)													March 31, 2017			March 31, 2016
Adjusted EBITDA	$	12,555		$	7,101		$	36,404		$	8,850		$	13,569		$	10,548
Merger expenses		(139	)		(9,325	)		(614	)		(10,591	)		—			(41	)
Gain (loss) on disposal of property and equipment		344			(8	)		344			(6	)
Gain on sale of cost method investment		—			—			—			750
Impairments and other losses		—			—			—			(682	)
Share-based compensation		(1,654	)		(291	)		(2,509	)		(410	)		(1,427	)		(405	)
Preopening expenses		(801	)		(129	)		(1,893	)		(129	)		(272	)		(573	)
Depreciation and amortization		(7,223	)		(5,100	)		(19,862	)		(6,859	)		(6,552	)		(5,792	)
Income (loss) from operations		3,082			(7,752	)		11,870			(9,077	)
Income from operations														5,318			3,737
Non-operating income (expense)
Interest expense, net		(1,689	)		(980	)		(4,786	)		(1,423	)		(1,683	)		(1,457	)
Loss on extinguishment of debt		—			(1,174	)		—			(1,174	)
Other, net		—			50			18			86			—			18
Total non-operating expense, net		(1,689	)		(2,104	)		(4,768	)		(2,511	)		(1,683	)		(1,439	)

Income (loss) before income tax benefit (provision)		1,393			(9,856	)		7,102			(11,588	)
Income before income tax benefit (provision)														3,635			2,298
Income tax benefit (provision)		(91	)		12,874			(761	)		12,702			1,707			(59	)
Net income	$	1,302		$	3,018		$	6,341		$	1,114		$	5,342		$	2,239

As of ~~September 30, 2016,~~March 31, 2017, we had ~~$40.0~~$45.2 million in cash and cash ~~equivalents. On June 17, 2016, our Board of Directors approved~~equivalents and ~~declared a special cash dividend of $23.5 million that was paid on July 14, 2016 to eligible shareholders of record as of the close of business on June 30, 2016.~~no short-term investments. We currently believe that our cash and cash equivalents, cash flows from operations and borrowing availability under ~~our $50.0 million senior secured~~the revolving credit facility under our Credit Agreement (the “Revolving Credit Facility”) will be sufficient to meet our working capital requirements during the next 12 months. To further enhance our liquidity position or to finance acquisitions or other business investment initiatives, we may obtain additional financing, which could consist of debt, convertible debt or equity financing from public and/or private credit and capital markets.

Our operating results and performance depend significantly on national, regional and local economic conditions and their effect on consumer spending. Declines in consumer spending would cause revenues generated in both our Distributed Gaming and Casinos segments to be adversely affected. In addition, we perform on-going refurbishment and maintenance at our properties, of which certain maintenance costs are capitalized if such improvement or refurbishment extends the life of the related asset, while other maintenance costs that do not so qualify are expensed as incurred. The commitment of capital and the related timing thereof are contingent upon, among other things, negotiation of final agreements and receipt of approvals from the appropriate regulatory bodies.

To further enhance our liquidity position or to finance acquisitions or other business investment initiatives, we may obtain additional financing, which could consist of debt, convertible debt or equity financing from public and/or private credit and capital markets. Any additional financing that is needed may not be available to us or, if available, may not be on terms favorable to us. In June 2016, we filed a universal shelf registration statement with the SEC for the future sale of up to $150.0 million of common stock, preferred stock, debt securities, warrants and units. The securities may be offered from time to time, separately or together, directly by us or through underwriters, dealers or agents at amounts, prices, interest rates and other terms to be determined at the time of the applicable offering.

Net cash provided by operating activities was relatively unchanged year-over-year, at $10.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017, compared to $10.8 million for the prior year period.

Net cash used in investing activities was $5.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017, compared to $26.6 million for the prior year period. The decrease in net cash used in investing activities as compared to the prior year period was primarily due to the consummation of the Initial Montana Acquisition during the prior year period.

Net cash used in financing activities was $6.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017, primarily related to repayments under the Credit Agreement. Net cash provided by financing activities was $13.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2016, primarily related to proceeds from borrowings, net of repayments, under the Credit Agreement.

On July 31, 2015, we entered into a Credit Agreement with the lenders named therein and Capital One, National Association (as administrative agent). The Credit Agreement was amended on March 25, 2016 to, among other matters, increase the size of the Revolving Credit Facility from $40.0 million to $50.0 million and to provide for the borrowing of an additional $40.0 million in aggregate principal amount of incremental senior secured term loans under the Credit Agreement (the “Incremental Term Loans”). As of ~~September 30, 2016,~~March 31, 2017, the facilities under the Credit Agreement consisted of $160.0 million in senior secured term loans ~~(the “Term Loans,” which include the Incremental~~ (“Term ~~Loans)~~Loans”) and a $50.0 million Revolving Credit Facility (together with the Term Loans, the “Facilities”). As of ~~September 30, 2016,~~March 31, 2017, we had ~~$153.0~~$147.0 million in principal amount of outstanding Term Loan borrowings and ~~$25.0~~$27.0 million in principal amount of outstanding borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility. The facilities mature on July 31, 2020.

Borrowings under the Credit Agreement bear interest, at our option, at either (1) the highest of the federal funds rate plus 0.50%, the Eurodollar rate for a one-month interest period plus 1.00%, or the administrative agent’s prime rate as announced from time to time, or (2) the Eurodollar rate for the applicable interest period, plus, in each case, an applicable margin based on our leverage ratio. ~~As of September 30, 2016,~~For the three months ended March 31, 2017, the weighted average effective interest rate on our outstanding borrowings under the Credit Agreement was approximately ~~3.02%~~3.3%.

Outstanding borrowings under the Term Loans ~~must~~at March 31, 2017 will be repaid in ~~two quarterly payments of $1.5 million each (which commenced on December 31, 2015), followed by two quarterly payments of $2.0 million each (which commenced on June 30, 2016), followed by eight~~seven quarterly payments of $3.0 million each (commencing ~~December~~March 31, ~~2016)~~2017), followed by four quarterly payments of $4.0 million each (commencing December 31, 2018), followed by three quarterly payments of $6.0 million each (commencing December 31, 2019), followed by a final installment of $95.0 million at maturity on July 31, 2020. The commitment fee for the Revolving Credit Facility is payable quarterly at a rate of between 0.25% and 0.30%, depending on our leverage ~~ratio.~~ratio, and is accrued based on the average daily amount of the available revolving commitment.

The Credit Agreement is guaranteed by all of our present and future direct and indirect wholly owned subsidiaries (other than certain insignificant or unrestricted subsidiaries), and is secured by substantially all of our and the subsidiary guarantors’ present and future personal and real property (subject to receipt of certain approvals).

Under the Credit Agreement, we and our subsidiaries are subject to certain limitations, including limitations on our ability to: incur additional debt, grant liens, sell assets, make certain investments, pay dividends and make certain other restricted payments. In addition, we will be required to pay down the Facilities under certain circumstances if we or any of our subsidiaries sell assets or property, issue debt or receive certain extraordinary receipts. The Credit Agreement contains financial covenants regarding a maximum leverage ratio and a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio. The Credit Agreement also prohibits the occurrence of a change of control, which includes the acquisition of beneficial ownership of 30% or more of our equity securities (other than by certain permitted holders, which include, among others, Blake L. Sartini, Lyle A. Berman and certain affiliated entities) and a change in a majority of the members of our Board of Directors that is not approved by the Board. If we default under the Credit Agreement due to a covenant breach or otherwise, the lenders may be entitled to, among other things, require the immediate repayment of all outstanding amounts and sell our assets to satisfy the obligations thereunder. We were in compliance with our financial covenants under the Credit Agreement as of ~~September 30, 2016.~~March 31, 2017.

We perform on-going refurbishment and maintenance at our facilities, of which certain maintenance costs are capitalized if such improvement or refurbishment extends the life of the related asset, while other maintenance cost that do not so qualify are expensed as incurred. The commitment of capital and the related timing thereof are contingent upon, among other things, negotiation of final agreements and receipt of approvals from the appropriate regulatory bodies. We intend to fund capital expenditures through our Revolving Credit Facility and operating cash flows.

See Note 10, Commitments and Contingencies, in the accompanying consolidated financial statement for additional information regarding commitments and contingencies that may also affect our liquidity.

We may investigate and pursue expansion opportunities in our existing or new markets. Such expansions will be influenced and determined by a number of factors, which may include licensing availability and approval, suitable investment opportunities and availability of acceptable financing. Investigation and pursuit of such opportunities may require us to make substantial investments or incur substantial costs, which we may fund through cash flows from operations or borrowing availability under our Revolving Credit Facility. To the extent such sources of funds are not sufficient, we may also seek to raise such additional funds through public or private equity or debt financings or from other sources. No assurance can be given that additional financing will be available or that, if available, such financing will be obtainable on terms favorable to us. Moreover, we can provide no assurances that the investigation or pursuit of an opportunity will result in a completed transaction.

~~This Management’s Discussion~~Management's discussion and ~~Analysis~~analysis of ~~Financial Condition~~our results of operations and ~~Results of Operations discusses~~liquidity and capital resources are based on our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with ~~United States generally accepted accounting principles.~~GAAP. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the balance sheet date and reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates and judgments, including those related to the application of the acquisition method of accounting, long-lived assets, goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets, revenue recognition ~~short-term investments, investments in unconsolidated investees, litigation costs,~~and promotional allowances, income taxes and share-based ~~compensation.~~compensation expenses. We base our estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various other factors that are reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ materially from these estimates.

~~The following represent~~There have been no material changes to our critical accounting policies ~~that involve the more significant judgments~~described under Part II. Item 7. Management's Discussion and ~~estimates used~~Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in ~~the preparation of our consolidated financial statements. See Note 2,~~ ~~Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, to the consolidated financial~~

~~statements included in Item 8 of~~ our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2015,~~2016, previously filed with the ~~SEC, for a discussion of all of our significant accounting policies.~~

On July 31, 2015, we acquired Sartini Gaming through the Merger. Additionally, in January 2016 we completed the Initial Montana Acquisition and in April 2016 we completed the Second Montana Acquisition. We have applied the acquisition method of accounting to these business combinations, which requires the following:

We are in the process of completing our valuation procedures with respect to the Montana Acquisitions, and the resulting estimated fair value of the assets acquired has been recorded based upon our preliminary valuation of the business enterprise and tangible and intangible assets. Enterprise value allocation methodology requires management to make assumptions and apply judgment to estimate the fair value of assets acquired. If estimates or assumptions used to complete the enterprise valuation and estimates of the fair value of the assets acquired significantly differed from assumptions made, the resulting difference could materially affect the estimated fair value of net assets.

~~The application of the acquisition method of accounting guidance for the Merger and the Montana Acquisitions had the following effects on our consolidated financial statements:~~

Our long-lived assets were carried at $136.4 million as of September 30, 2016, or 33.4% of our consolidated total assets. We evaluate the carrying value of long-lived assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of such assets may not be recoverable. If triggering events are identified, we then compare the estimated undiscounted future cash flows of the asset to the carrying value of the asset. The asset is not impaired if the undiscounted future cash flows exceed its carrying value. If the carrying value exceeds the undiscounted future cash flows, then an impairment charge is recorded, typically measured using a discounted cash flow model, which is based on the estimated future results of the relevant reporting unit discounted using our weighted-average cost of capital and market indicators of terminal year free cash flow multiples.

A long-lived asset must be tested for recoverability whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that its carrying amount may not be recoverable. The following are examples of such events or changes in circumstances:

We reconsider changes in circumstances on a frequent basis, and if a triggering event related to potential impairment has occurred, we solicit third party valuation expertise to assist in the valuation of our assets. There are three generally accepted approaches available in developing an opinion of value: the cost, sales comparison and income approaches. We generally consider each of these approaches in developing a recommendation of the fair value of the asset; however the reliability of each approach is dependent upon the availability and comparability of the market data uncovered, as well as, the decision-making criteria used by market participants when evaluating an asset. We will bifurcate our investment and apply the most indicative approach to overall fair valuation, or in some cases, a weighted analysis of any or all of these methods.

Developing an opinion of land value is typically accomplished using a sales comparison approach by analyzing recent sales transactions of similar sites. Potential comparables are researched and the pertinent facts are confirmed with parties involved in the transaction. This process fosters a general understanding of the potential comparable sales and facilitates the selection of the most relevant comparables by the appraiser. Valuation is typically accomplished using a unit of comparison such as price per square foot of land or potential building area. Adjustments are applied to the unit of comparison from an analysis of comparable sales, and the adjusted unit of comparison is then used to derive a value for the property.

The cost approach is based on the premise that a prudent investor would pay no more for an asset of similar utility than its replacement or reproduction cost. The cost to replace the asset would include the cost of constructing a similar asset of equivalent utility at prices applicable at the time of the valuation date. To arrive at an estimate of the fair value using the cost approach, the replacement cost new is determined and reduced for depreciation of the asset. Replacement cost new is defined as the current cost of producing or constructing a similar new item having the nearest equivalent utility as the property being valued.

The income approach focuses on the income-producing capability of the asset. The underlying premise of this approach is that the value of an asset can be measured by the present worth of the net economic benefit (cash receipts less cash outlays) to be received over the life of the subject asset. The steps followed in applying this approach include estimating the expected before-tax cash flows attributable to the asset over its life and converting these before-tax cash flows to present value through capitalization or discounting. The process uses a rate of return that accounts for both the time value of money and risk factors. There are two common methods for converting net income into value: the direct capitalization method and discounted cash flow (“DCF”) method. Direct capitalization is a method used to convert an estimate of a single year's income expectancy into an indication of value in one direct step by dividing the income estimate by an appropriate capitalization rate. Under the DCF method, anticipated future cash flows and a reversionary value are discounted to an opinion of net present value at a specific internal rate of return or a yield rate, because net operating income of the subject property is not fully stabilized.

As of September 30, 2016, using preliminary estimates for the Montana Acquisitions, we had $105.7 million in goodwill and $100.5 million in other intangible assets, net, representing approximately 25.9% and 24.6% of total assets, respectively, resulting primarily from the Merger and the Montana Acquisitions. We expect to finalize the respective purchase price allocations related to the Montana Acquisitions by no later than one year from the date of the relevant acquisition. As a result, the allocation of values to the acquired assets, as well as goodwill, could change significantly during the applicable measurement period.

Goodwill represents the excess of consideration paid over the fair value of net assets acquired in a business combination. Goodwill is not amortized. Goodwill is tested annually, or more frequently if indicators of impairment exist, in two steps. In step 1 of the impairment test, the current fair value of each reporting unit is estimated using a discounted cash flow model which is then compared to the carrying value of each reporting unit. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value in step 1 of the impairment test, then step 2 of the impairment test is performed to determine the implied fair value of goodwill for that reporting unit. If the implied fair value of goodwill is less than the goodwill allocated for that reporting unit, an impairment loss is recognized.

We consider our Nevada and Montana gaming licenses as indefinite-lived intangible assets that do not require amortization based on our future expectations to operate our gaming facilities indefinitely as well as our historical experience in renewing these intangible assets at minimal cost. Rather, these intangible assets are tested annually for impairment, or more frequently if indicators of impairment exist, by comparing the fair value of the recorded assets to their carrying amount. If the carrying amount of our Nevada or Montana gaming licenses exceeds their fair value, an impairment loss is recognized. We complete our testing of our intangible assets prior to assessing our goodwill for possible impairment.

We consider our trade names related to the Nevada casinos and taverns as indefinite-lived intangible assets that do not require amortization based on our future expectations to operate our casinos and taverns indefinitely under these trade names. Rather, these intangible assets are tested annually for impairment, or more frequently if indicators of impairment exist, by comparing the fair value of the recorded assets to their carrying amount. If the carrying amount of our trade names exceeds their fair value, an impairment loss is recognized. We complete our testing of our intangible assets prior to assessing our goodwill for possible impairment.

The evaluation of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets requires the use of estimates about future operating results of each reporting unit to determine the estimated fair value of the reporting unit and the indefinite-lived intangible assets. We must make various assumptions and estimates in performing our impairment testing. The implied fair value includes estimates of future cash flows (including an allocation of our projected rental obligation to our reporting units) that are based on reasonable and supportable assumptions which represent our best estimates of the cash flows expected to result from the use of the assets including their eventual disposition. Changes in estimates, increases in our cost of capital, reductions in transaction multiples, changes in operating and capital expenditure assumptions or application of alternative assumptions and definitions could produce significantly different results. Future cash flow estimates are, by their nature, subjective and actual results may differ materially from our estimates. If our ongoing estimates of future cash flows are not met, we may have to record impairment charges in future accounting periods. Our estimates of cash flows are based on the current regulatory and economic climates, recent operating information and budgets of the various properties where we conduct operations. These estimates could be negatively impacted by changes in federal, state or local regulations, economic downturns, or other events affecting our properties.

Forecasted cash flows (based on our annual operating plan as determined in the fourth quarter) can be significantly impacted by the local economy in which our reporting units operate. For example, increases in unemployment rates can result in decreased customer visitations and/or lower customer spend per visit. In addition, the impact of new legislation which approves gaming in nearby jurisdictions or further expands gaming in jurisdictions where our reporting units currently operate can result in opportunities for us to expand our operations. However, it also has the impact of increasing competition for our established properties which generally will have a negative effect on those locations' profitability once competitors become established as some erosion of revenues occurs absent an overall increase in customer visitations. Lastly, increases in gaming taxes approved by state regulatory bodies can negatively impact forecasted cash flows.

Assumptions and estimates about future cash flow levels and multiples by individual reporting units are complex and subjective. They are sensitive to changes in underlying assumptions and can be affected by a variety of factors, including external factors, such as industry, geopolitical and economic trends, and internal factors, such as changes in our business strategy, which may reallocate capital and resources to different or new opportunities which management believes will enhance our overall value but may be to the detriment of an individual reporting unit.

~~Our annual impairment test of our goodwill and other indefinite-life intangible assets will be performed on October 1st of each year, commencing October 1, 2016.~~

Gaming revenue, which is defined as the difference between gaming wins and losses, is recognized as wins and losses occur from gaming activities. The retail value of rooms, food and beverage, and other services furnished to customers without charge, including coupons for discounts when redeemed, is included in gross revenues and then deducted as a promotional allowance. The estimated cost of providing such promotional allowances is included in gaming expenses.

Food, beverage, and retail revenues are recorded at the time of sale. Room revenue is recorded at the time of occupancy. Sales taxes and surcharges collected from customers and remitted to governmental authorities are presented on a net basis. Accounts receivable deemed uncollectible are charged off through a provision for uncollectible accounts.

The determination of our income tax-related account balances requires the exercise of significant judgment by management, particularly regarding the probability that net deferred tax assets will be realized. Management assesses the likelihood that deferred tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income and establishes a valuation allowance when management believes recovery is not likely.

~~We record estimated penalties and interest related to income tax matters, including uncertain tax positions, if any, as a component of income tax expense.~~

We have various share-based compensation programs, which provide for equity awards such as stock options and restricted stock units. We use the straight-line method to recognize compensation expense associated with share-based awards based on the fair value on the date of grant, net of the estimated forfeiture rate, if any. Expense is recognized over the requisite service period related to each award, which is the period between the grant date and the award’s stated vesting term. The fair value of stock options is estimated

~~using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. All of our share-based compensation expense is recorded in selling, general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of operations.~~SEC.

~~Significant~~No significant changes occurred in the first ~~nine~~three months of ~~2016~~2017 to the contractual commitments discussed in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Commitments and Contractual Obligations” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 included: (i) increased scheduled principal repayments and interest related to the additional $40.0 million principal amount of Incremental Term Loans under the amendment to our Facilities; see Note 5, ~~Debt~~, in the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements for additional information regarding our Facilities; and (ii) contingent consideration of up to a total of $2.0 million to be paid in cash in four quarterly payments beginning in September 2017, subject to certain potential adjustments, that we are required to pay to the sellers in connection with the Initial Montana Acquisition; see Note 2, ~~Merger and Acquisitions, in the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements for additional information regarding the Initial Montana Acquisition.~~2016.

We believe that our Distributed Gaming and Casinos segments are affected by seasonal factors, including holidays, weather and travel conditions. Rocky Gap typically experiences higher revenues during summer months and may be significantly adversely impacted by inclement weather during winter months. Our casinos and distributed gaming business in Nevada have historically experienced lower revenues during the summer as a result of fewer tourists due to higher temperatures, as well as increased vacation activity by local residents. Our Nevada and Montana distributed gaming operations typically experience higher revenues during the fall which corresponds with several professional sports seasons. Additionally, our Montana distributed gaming operations typically see higher revenues during winter months due to the inclement weather during winter months limiting outdoor activities. While other factors like unemployment levels, market competition and the diversification of our business may either offset or magnify seasonal effects, some seasonality is likely to continue, which could result in significant fluctuation in our quarterly operating results.

See Note 1, Nature of Business and Basis of Presentation, in the accompanying consolidated financial statements for information regarding recently issued accounting pronouncements.

The distributed gaming and casino industries are subject to extensive regulation by state gaming authorities. Changes in applicable laws or regulations could have ana material adverse effect on us.

The gaming industry represents a significant source of tax revenues to regulators. From time to time, various federal and state legislators and officials have proposed changes in tax law, or in the administration of such law, affecting the gaming industry. It is not possible to determine the likelihood of possible changes in tax law or in the administration of such law. Such changes, if adopted, could have a material adverse effect on our future financial position, results of operations, cash flows and prospects.

We have no off balance sheet arrangements that have, or are reasonably likely to have, a current or future effect on our financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to investors.

Our primary exposure to market risk is interest rate risk associated with our variable rate long-term debt. As of ~~September 30, 2016,~~March 31, 2017, approximately 96% of our ~~investment portfolio included $40.0 million in cash and cash equivalents. As of September 30, 2016, we did not hold any short-term investments.~~indebtedness for borrowed money accrued interest at a variable rate, which primarily comprised our indebtedness under the Credit Agreement.

~~As of September 30, 2016,~~At March 31, 2017, we had ~~$178.0~~$174.0 million in principal amount of outstanding borrowings under the Credit ~~Agreement, which bear interest at a variable rate.~~Agreement. Our primary interest rate under the Credit Agreement is the Eurodollar rate plus an applicable margin that is based on our total leverage ratio. ~~As of September 30, 2016,~~For the three months ended March 31, 2017, the weighted average effective interest rate on our outstanding borrowings under the Credit Agreement was ~~approximately 3.02%~~3.3%. Assuming the outstanding balance remained constant over a year, a 50 basis point increase in the interest rate would increase interest incurred, prior to effects of capitalized interest, by $0.9 million over a twelve-month period.

As of March 31, 2017, our investment portfolio included $45.2 million in cash and cash equivalents. As of March 31, 2017, we did not hold any short-term investments.

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures designed to provide reasonable assurance of achieving the objective that information in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified and pursuant to the requirements of the SEC’s rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosures. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.

As required by SEC Rule 13a-15(b), we carried out an evaluation, with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of ~~September 30, 2016,~~March 31, 2017, the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the ~~foregoing,~~material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting which existed as of December 31, 2016, as described below, existed as of March 31, 2017. As a result of this material weakness, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective at a reasonable assurance level as of ~~September 30, 2016.~~March 31, 2017.

On ~~January 29, 2016, the Initial Montana Acquisition was completed, and on~~ April 22, 2016, the Second Montana Acquisition was completed. Management has begun the evaluation of the internal control structures of the distributed gaming businesses acquired in the Second Montana ~~Acquisitions.~~Acquisition. However, SEC guidance permits management to omit an assessment of an acquired business’ internal control over financial reporting from management’s assessments of internal control over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures for a period not to exceed one year from the date of the acquisition. Accordingly, we excluded the distributed gaming businesses acquired in the Second Montana ~~Acquisitions~~Acquisition from our evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of ~~September 30, 2016.~~March 31, 2017. We have reported the operating results of such acquired distributed gaming businesses in our consolidated statements of operations and cash flows from the ~~respective~~ acquisition ~~dates~~date through ~~September 30, 2016.~~March 31, 2017. As of ~~September 30, 2016,~~March 31, 2017, total assets related to the businesses acquired in the Second Montana ~~Acquisitions~~Acquisition represented approximately ~~12.7%~~6.1% of our total assets, which consisted primarily of intangible assets, including goodwill, recorded on a preliminary basis as the measurement ~~periods~~period for the business ~~combinations~~combination remained open as of ~~September 30, 2016.~~March 31, 2017. Net revenues from the Second Montana ~~Acquisitions~~Acquisition comprised approximately ~~14.5% and 10.8%~~7.8% of our consolidated net revenues for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2016, respectively.~~March 31, 2017.

A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the registrant’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. ~~We excluded the Sartini Gaming businesses from our~~The material weakness that management previously identified in connection with its evaluation of ~~the effectiveness of~~our internal control over financial reporting, as of December 31, ~~2015. Nonetheless, we became aware of the following material weaknesses~~2016 was as ~~of December 31, 2015 relating to the Sartini Gaming business:~~follows:

In light of the material weakness described above, and based on the criteria set forth in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the COSO, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was ~~the result of insufficient staff to perform these functions.~~

remediating the material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting described above. During the three months ended ~~September 30, 2016, we have taken~~March 31, 2017, the ~~following actions~~Audit Committee directed management to ~~remediate~~develop and present to the Committee a plan and timetable for the implementation of remediation measures to correct this material ~~weaknesses described above:~~weakness. Management has delivered the remediation plan and timetable to the Audit Committee. Under management’s remediation plan, the remediation measures will include, among other things:

We believe that the actions described above have remediated the material weaknesses that were identified and have strengthened our internal control over financial reporting. We will include the Sartini Gaming businesses in our evaluation of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting aspersonnel regarding our procedures and systems concerning the preparation and review of ~~December 31, 2016.~~account reconciliations.

During the quarter ended ~~September 30, 2016,~~March 31, 2017, except as described above, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. As described above, we completed the ~~Initial Montana Acquisition on January 29, 2016 and completed the~~ Second Montana Acquisition on April 22, 2016. Acquisition-related integration activities may lead us to modify certain internal controls in future periods.

From time to time, we are involved in a variety of lawsuits, claims, investigations and other legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business, including proceedings concerning labor and employment matters, personal injury claims, breach of contract claims, commercial disputes, business practices, intellectual property, tax and other matters. Although lawsuits, claims, investigations and other legal proceedings are inherently uncertain and their results cannot be predicted with certainty, we believe that the resolution of our currently pending matters will not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or liquidity. Regardless of the outcome, legal proceedings can have an adverse impact on us because of defense costs, diversion of management resources and other factors. In addition, it is possible that an unfavorable resolution of one or more such proceedings could in the future materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations or liquidity in a particular period.

In February and April 2017, several former employees filed two separate purported class action lawsuits against us in the District Court of Clark County, Nevada, and on behalf of similarly situated individuals employed by us in the State of Nevada. The lawsuits allege we violated certain Nevada labor laws including payment of an hourly wage below the statutory minimum wage without providing a qualified health insurance plan and an associated failure to pay proper overtime compensation. The complaints seek, on behalf of the plaintiffs and members of the putative class, an unspecified amount of damages (including punitive damages), injunctive and equitable relief, and an award of attorneys’ fees, interest and costs. These cases are at an early stage in the proceedings, and we are therefore unable to make a reasonable estimate of the probable loss or range of losses, if any, that might arise from these matters. Therefore, we have not recorded any amount for the claims as of the date of this filing. While legal proceedings are inherently unpredictable and no assurance can be given as to the ultimate outcome of these matters, based on management’s current understanding of the relevant facts and circumstances, we believe that these proceedings should not have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2015, as updated by our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,~~ 2016, which factors could materially affect our business, financial condition, liquidity or future results. There have been no material changes to the risk factors described in the “Risk Factors” section in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2015, as so updated.~~2016. The risks described in our ~~reports~~Annual Report on ~~Forms~~Form 10-K ~~and 10-Q~~ are not the only risks facing our company. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, liquidity, future results or prospects.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Minnesota	41-1913991
(State or other jurisdiction	(I.R.S. Employer
of incorporation or organization)	Identification No.)

6595 S Jones Boulevard
Las Vegas, Nevada	89118
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

Large accelerated filer		☐	Accelerated filer	☒

Non-accelerated filer	☐	~~(Do~~☐ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company	☐

Emerging growth company		☐

		Page
PART I.	FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1.	FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)	1

	Consolidated Balance Sheets as of ~~September 30, 2016~~March 31, 2017 and December 31, ~~2015~~2016	1

	Consolidated Statements of Operations ~~and Comprehensive Income (Loss)~~ for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2017 and 2016 ~~and September 30, 2015~~	2

	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2017 and 2016 ~~and September 30, 2015~~	3

	Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	4

ITEM 2.	MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS	2117

ITEM 3.	QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK	3223

ITEM 4.	CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES	3324

PART II.	OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1.	LEGAL PROCEEDINGS	3425

ITEM 1A.	RISK FACTORS	3425

ITEM 6.	EXHIBITS	3526

SIGNATURES		3627

(In thousands)	Final Purchase Price Allocation
Cash and cash equivalents	$	1,700
Property and equivalents		2,350
Intangible assets		14,400
Goodwill		1,680
Total acquired assets	$	20,130

(In thousands)	Preliminary Purchase Price Allocation
Cash and other current assets	$	404
Property and equipment		7,839
Intangible assets		11,400
Goodwill		6,013
Total acquired assets	$	25,656

(In thousands)	Useful Life	As Recorded, at Fair Value
Customer relationships	15 years	$	9,800
Non-competition agreements	5 years		3,900
Trade name	4 years		500
Other	15 years		200
Total intangible assets acquired		$	14,400

(In thousands)	Useful Life	Preliminary Assessment of Fair Value
Customer relationships	15 years	$	9,100
Non-competition agreements	5 years		1,800
Trade name	4 years		200
Other	15 years		300
Total intangible assets acquired		$	11,400

	Amount
Cash	$	25,539
Other current assets		14,830
Property and equipment		83,173
Intangible assets		80,460
Goodwill		97,462
Current liabilities		(13,245	)
Warrant liability		(3,435	)
Debt		(190,587	)
Deferred tax liability		(14,576	)
Other long-term liabilities		(2,217	)
Total purchase price	$	77,404

	Remaining Useful Life (Years)	Amount Assigned
Land	Not applicable	$	12,470
Land improvements	5-14		4,030
Building and improvements	19-25		21,310
Leasehold improvements	1-28		20,793
Furniture, fixtures and equipment	1-11		21,935
Construction in process	Not applicable		2,635
Total property and equipment		$	83,173

Exhibits		Description

10.1#		Second Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated as of March 10, 2017, by and between Golden Entertainment, Inc. and Stephen Arcana (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11.2 to Golden Entertainment, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, filed on March 16, 2017)
10.2#		First Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated as of March 10, 2017, by and between Golden Entertainment, Inc. and Charles Protell (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12.1 to Golden Entertainment, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, filed on March 16, 2017)
10.3#		Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated as of March 10, 2017, by and between Golden Entertainment, Inc. and Blake L. Sartini II (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to Golden Entertainment, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, filed on March 16, 2017)
10.4#		Golden Entertainment, Inc. Amended and Restated Non-Employee Director Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to Golden Entertainment, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, filed on March 16, 2017)
31.1*		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

31.2*		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.1*		Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

101.INS		XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

101.CAL		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

101.DEF		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Definition Document

101.LAB		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document

101.PRE		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

	GOLDEN ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
	Registrant

Dated: May 10, 2017	/s/ BLAKE L. SARTINI
	Blake L. Sartini
	Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
	(Principal Executive Officer)

	/s/ ~~MATTHEW W. FLANDERMEYER~~CHARLES H. PROTELL
	~~Matthew W. Flandermeyer~~Charles H. Protell
	Executive Vice President, Chief Strategy Officer and Chief Financial Officer
	(Principal Financial Officer)
	/s/ GARY A. VECCHIARELLI
	Gary A. Vecchiarelli
	Senior Vice President of Accounting and Finance
	(Principal Accounting Officer)