(Former Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year, if Changed Since Last Report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically ~~and posted on its corporate Web site, if any,~~ every Interactive Data File required to be submitted ~~and posted~~ pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit ~~and post~~ such files). Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒

As of ~~October 31, 2017,~~July 30, 2019, the registrant had ~~21,059,269~~23,895,442 shares of its common stock, ~~$0.01~~ par value $0.01 per share, outstanding.

This quarterly report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 that are subject to risks and uncertainties. In particular, statements relating to our liquidity and capital resources, the performance of our properties and results of operations contain forward-looking statements. Furthermore, all of the statements regarding future financial performance (including market conditions and demographics) are forward-looking statements. We caution investors that any forward-looking statements presented in this quarterly report are based on management’s current beliefs and assumptions made by, and information currently available to, management. When used, the words “anticipate,” “believe,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “might,” “plan,” “estimate,” “project,” “should,” “will,” “would,” “result” and similar expressions that do not relate solely to historical matters are intended to identify forward-looking statements. You can also identify forward-looking statements by discussions of strategy, plans or intentions.

Forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions and may be affected by known and unknown risks, trends, uncertainties and factors that are beyond our control. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those anticipated, estimated or projected. We caution you therefore against relying on any of these forward-looking statements.

Some of the risks and uncertainties that may cause our actual results, performance, liquidity or achievements to differ materially from those expressed or implied by forward-looking statements include, among others, the following:

While forward-looking statements reflect our good faith beliefs, they are not guarantees of future performance. They are based on estimates and assumptions only as of the date of this quarterly report. We undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statement to reflect changes in underlying assumptions or factors, new information, data or methods, future events or other changes, except as required by law.

	September 30, 2017			December 31, 2016			June 30, 2019			December 31, 2018
	(Unaudited)						(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Operating Real Estate Investments
Land	$	167,245		$	165,863		$	203,748		$	202,347
Buildings and improvements		768,499			733,374			914,771			935,604
Intangible lease assets		3,021			5,140			2,971			3,049
Construction in progress		1,850			2,828			612			1,881
Furniture, fixtures, and equipment		41,190			36,616			57,545			61,456
Total Gross Operating Real Estate Investments		981,805			943,821			1,179,647			1,204,337
Accumulated depreciation and amortization		(78,387	)		(60,214	)		(127,118	)		(134,124	)
Total Net Operating Real Estate Investments		903,418			883,607			1,052,529			1,070,213
Real estate held for sale, net of accumulated depreciation of $3,397 and $6,099, respectively		32,915			79,430
Real estate held for sale, net of accumulated depreciation of $33,305 and $897, respectively								175,968			17,329
Total Net Real Estate Investments		936,333			963,037			1,228,497			1,087,542
Cash and cash equivalents		92,695			22,705			16,892			19,864
Restricted cash		29,417			32,556			22,676			23,265
Accounts receivable		3,298			3,008			2,667			3,340
Prepaid and other assets		3,923			1,678			3,826			9,058
Fair market value of interest rate swaps		11,759			12,413			2,363			18,141
TOTAL ASSETS	$	1,077,425		$	1,035,397		$	1,276,921		$	1,161,210

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Liabilities:
Mortgages payable, net	$	694,968		$	367,453		$	769,973		$	824,702
Mortgages payable held for sale, net		30,327			55,685			156,636			13,318
Credit facilities, net		29,803			310,492
Bridge facility, net		54,531			29,874
Credit facility, net								51,536			—
Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities		5,229			5,551			6,679			5,765
Accrued real estate taxes payable		11,443			6,534			10,192			12,607
Accrued interest payable		1,820			1,067			3,086			2,852
Security deposit liability		1,451			1,364			2,032			1,889
Prepaid rents		1,627			1,275			1,554			1,482
Fair market value of interest rate swaps								853			-
Total Liabilities		831,199			779,295			1,002,541			862,615

Redeemable noncontrolling interests in the Operating Partnership (see Note 10)		2,110			—
Redeemable noncontrolling interests in the Operating Partnership								3,032			2,567

Equity:
Stockholders' Equity:
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value: 100,000,000 shares authorized; 0 shares issued		—			—			—			—
Common stock, $0.01 par value: 500,000,000 shares authorized; 21,095,769 and 21,043,669 shares issued and outstanding, respectively		211			213
Common stock, $0.01 par value: 500,000,000 shares authorized; 23,895,442 and 23,499,635 shares issued and outstanding, respectively								238			234
Additional paid-in capital		206,613			241,450			297,448			285,511
Accumulated earnings less dividends		28,960			(14,584	)		(26,824	)		(6,764	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income		8,332			9,052			486			17,047
Common stock held in treasury at cost; 0 and 250,156 shares, respectively		—			(4,587	)
Total Stockholders' Equity		244,116			231,544			271,348			296,028
Noncontrolling interests		—			24,558
Total Equity		244,116			256,102
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY	$	1,077,425		$	1,035,397
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY							$	1,276,921		$	1,161,210

	For the Three Months Ended September 30,						For the Nine Months Ended September 30,						For the Three Months Ended June 30,						For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2017			2016			2017			2016			2019			2018			2019			2018
Revenues
Rental income	$	32,148		$	28,632		$	94,564		$	87,406		$	37,711		$	31,069		$	74,033		$	61,642
Other income		4,949			4,447			14,758			12,841			5,355			4,586			10,524			9,070
Total revenues		37,097			33,079			109,322			100,247			43,066			35,655			84,557			70,712
Expenses
Property operating expenses		10,075			9,874			29,611			28,947			10,161			8,231			19,800			17,108
Acquisition costs		—			386			—			386
Real estate taxes and insurance		4,853			3,973			14,911			12,326			5,564			4,588			11,322			9,444
Property management fees (1)		1,110			989			3,280			3,007			1,291			1,066			2,531			2,120
Advisory and administrative fees (2)		1,870			1,698			5,544			4,944			1,872			1,863			3,722			3,701
Corporate general and administrative expenses		1,623			1,023			4,842			2,649			2,741			1,986			4,974			3,799
Property general and administrative expenses		1,594			1,527			4,756			4,473			1,768			1,648			3,426			3,195
Depreciation and amortization		11,215			8,667			35,866			26,363			13,066			11,038			28,464			22,410
Total expenses		32,340			28,137			98,810			83,095			36,463			30,420			74,239			61,777
Operating income before gain on sales of real estate														6,603			5,235			10,318			8,935
Gain on sales of real estate														—			—			—			13,742
Operating income		4,757			4,942			10,512			17,152			6,603			5,235			10,318			22,677
Interest expense		(8,257	)		(4,791	)		(22,479	)		(15,650	)		(8,590	)		(6,823	)		(16,678	)		(13,620	)
Loss on extinguishment of debt and modification costs		(914	)		(888	)		(5,717	)		(1,722	)		—			(78	)		—			(629	)
Gain on sales of real estate		58,490			9,562			78,386			25,932
Net income		54,076			8,825			60,702			25,712
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests		—			1,735			2,836			4,047
Net income attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interests in the Operating Partnership		162			—			162			—
Net income attributable to common stockholders	$	53,914		$	7,090		$	57,704		$	21,665
Net income (loss)														(1,987	)		(1,666	)		(6,360	)		8,428
Net income (loss) attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interests in the Operating Partnership														(6	)		(5	)		(19	)		25
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders													$	(1,981	)	$	(1,661	)	$	(6,341	)	$	8,403
Other comprehensive income (loss)
Unrealized gains (losses) on interest rate derivatives		214			(1,084	)		(835	)		(1,128	)		(10,946	)		2,749			(16,611	)		10,510
Total comprehensive income		54,290			7,741			59,867			24,584
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests		—			1,627			2,720			3,935
Comprehensive income attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interests in the Operating Partnership		163			—			163			—
Comprehensive income attributable to common stockholders	$	54,127		$	6,114		$	56,984		$	20,649
Total comprehensive income (loss)														(12,933	)		1,083			(22,971	)		18,938
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interests in the Operating Partnership														(39	)		4			(69	)		57
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to common stockholders													$	(12,894	)	$	1,079		$	(22,902	)	$	18,881

Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic		21,085			21,260			21,057			21,282			23,736			20,780			23,643			20,883
Weighted average common shares outstanding - diluted		21,453			21,376			21,407			21,322			24,233			21,295			24,139			21,362

Earnings per share - basic	$	2.56		$	0.33		$	2.74		$	1.02
Earnings per share - diluted	$	2.51		$	0.33		$	2.70		$	1.02
Earnings (loss) per share - basic													$	(0.08	)	$	(0.08	)	$	(0.27	)	$	0.40
Earnings (loss) per share - diluted													$	(0.08	)	$	(0.08	)	$	(0.27	)	$	0.39

Dividends declared per common share	$	0.220		$	0.206		$	0.660		$	0.618

Preferred Stock

Common Stock

Additional

Accumulated
Earnings

Accumulated Other

Common Stock
Held in

Number of
Shares

Par Value

Number of
Shares

Par Value

Paid-in
Capital

Less
Dividends

Comprehensive
Income (Loss)

Treasury
at Cost

Noncontrolling
Interests

Total

Balances, December 31, 2016

—

$
—

21,293,825

$
213

$
241,450

$
(14,584
)

$
9,052

$
(4,587
)

$
24,558

$
256,102

Net income attributable to common stockholders

—

57,704

—

—

—

57,704

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

—

—

—

—

2,836

2,836

Contributions by noncontrolling interests

—

—

—

—

38

38

Distributions to noncontrolling interests

—

—

—

—

(4,789
)

(4,789
)
Purchase of noncontrolling interests

(31,313
)

—

—

—

(22,527
)

(53,840
)
Repurchase of common stock

—

—

—

(1,354
)

—

(1,354
)
Retirement of common stock held in treasury

(308,313
)

(3
)

(5,938
)

—

—

5,941

—

—

Vesting of stock-based compensation

110,257

1

2,414

—

—

—

—

2,415

Common stock dividends declared

—

(14,160
)

—

—

—

(14,160
)
Other comprehensive loss

—

—

(720
)

—

(116
)

(836
)
Balances, September 30, 2017

—
��

$
—

21,095,769

$
211

$
206,613

$
28,960

$
8,332

$
—

$
—

$
244,116

	For the Nine Months Ended September 30,						For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2017			2016			2019			2018
Cash flows from operating activities
Net income	$	60,702		$	25,712
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Net income (loss)							$	(6,360	)	$	8,428
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
Gain on sales of real estate		(78,386	)		(25,932	)		—			(13,742	)
Depreciation and amortization		35,866			26,363			28,464			22,410
Amortization/write-off of deferred financing costs		2,551			1,782			902			1,225
Change in fair value on derivative instruments included in interest expense		1,235			331			(3,734	)		(1,241	)
Net cash paid for derivative settlements		(777	)		(430	)
Amortization of fair market value adjustment of assumed debt		(155	)		(98	)
Net cash received on derivative settlements								3,720			1,177
Amortization/write-off of fair market value adjustment of assumed debt								(47	)		(121	)
Vesting of stock-based compensation		2,415			296			2,654			2,009
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects of acquisitions:
Operating assets		(413	)		(2,273	)		(585	)		(1,399	)
Operating liabilities		4,461			530			(1,394	)		(1,413	)
Net cash provided by operating activities		27,499			26,281			23,620			17,333

Cash flows from investing activities
Net proceeds from sales of real estate		224,416			131,786			—			29,553
Prepaid acquisition deposits		(1,500	)		(1,425	)
Prepaid acquisition costs								(1,000	)		—
Additions to real estate investments		(17,192	)		(18,022	)		(17,529	)		(15,104	)
Acquisitions of real estate investments		(138,106	)		(6,474	)		(133,792	)		—
Net cash provided by investing activities		67,618			105,865
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities								(152,321	)		14,449

Cash flows from financing activities
Mortgage proceeds received		583,713			—			78,987			17,760
Mortgage payments		(275,840	)		(271,274	)		(465	)		(29,471	)
Credit facilities proceeds received		25,000			200,000			52,500			5,000
Credit facilities payments		(310,000	)		—
Bridge facility proceeds received		65,875			—
Bridge facility payments		(41,278	)		(29,000	)		—			(8,597	)
Deferred financing costs paid		(3,742	)		(2,538	)		(1,861	)		(310	)
Interest rate cap fees paid								(20	)		(9	)
Proceeds from the issuance of common shares through at-the-market offering, net of offering costs								9,452			—
Payments for taxes related to net share settlement of stock-based compensation								(165	)		—
Repurchase of common stock		(1,354	)		(1,524	)		—			(9,672	)
Dividends paid to common stockholders		(13,996	)		(13,154	)		(13,288	)		(10,512	)
Distributions to redeemable noncontrolling interests in the Operating Partnership		(53	)		—
Contributions from noncontrolling interests		38			710
Distributions to noncontrolling interests		(4,789	)		(8,884	)
Purchase of noncontrolling interests		(51,840	)		(1,381	)
Net cash used in financing activities		(28,266	)		(127,045	)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities								125,140			(35,811	)

Net increase in cash and restricted cash		66,851			5,101
Cash and restricted cash, beginning of period		55,261			63,095
Cash and restricted cash, end of period	$	122,112		$	68,196
Net decrease in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash								(3,561	)		(4,029	)
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, beginning of period								43,129			43,248
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, end of period							$	39,568		$	39,219

Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information
Interest paid	$	19,098	$	15,255	$	19,323		$	14,042
Prepayment penalties paid		2,701		827
Prepayment penalties						—			172
Supplemental Disclosure of Noncash Activities
Issuance of operating partnership units for purchase of noncontrolling interests		2,000		—

Capitalized construction costs included in accounts payable and other accrued liabilities		1,245		935		1,513			1,607
Change in fair value on derivative instruments designated as hedges		835		1,128		(16,611	)		10,510
Other assets acquired from acquisitions						109			—
Liabilities assumed from acquisitions		690		232		647			—
Other assets acquired from acquisitions		84		63
Assumed debt on acquisition of real estate investment		—		15,812
Increase in dividends payable on restricted stock units		164		43
Assumed debt on acquisitions						10,109
Increase in dividends payable upon vesting of restricted stock units						55			184

NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc. (the “Company”, “we”, “our”) was incorporated in Maryland on September 19, 2014, and has elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”). The Company is focused on “value-add” multifamily investments primarily located in the Southeastern and Southwestern United States. Substantially all of the Company’s business is conducted through NexPoint Residential Trust Operating Partnership, L.P. (the “OP”), the Company’s operating partnership. The Company owns its properties (the “Portfolio”) through the OP and its wholly owned taxable REIT subsidiary (“TRS”). The OP owns approximately 99.9% of the Portfolio; the TRS owns approximately 0.1% of the Portfolio. The Company’s wholly owned subsidiary, NexPoint Residential Trust Operating Partnership GP, LLC (the “OP GP”), is the sole general partner of the OP. As of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2019, there were ~~21,116,902~~23,819,402 common units in the OP (“OP Units”) outstanding, of which ~~21,043,669,~~23,746,169, or 99.7%, were owned by the Company and 73,233, or 0.3%, were owned by ~~an unaffiliated~~a noncontrolling limited partner (see Note 10).

The Company began operations on March 31, 2015 as a result of the transfer and contribution by NexPoint Credit Strategies Fund (“NHF”) of all but one of the multifamily properties owned by NHF through its wholly owned subsidiary NexPoint Real Estate Opportunities, LLC (fka Freedom REIT, LLC) (“NREO”). We use the term “predecessor” to mean the carve-out business of NREO. On March 31, 2015, NHF distributed all of the outstanding shares of the Company's common stock held by NHF to holders of NHF common shares. We refer to the distribution of our common stock by NHF as the “Spin-Off.”

The Company is externally managed by NexPoint Real Estate Advisors, L.P. (the “Adviser”), through an agreement dated March 16, 2015, as amended, and renewed on ~~March~~February 13, ~~2017~~2019 for a one-year term set to expire on March 16, ~~2018~~2020 (the “Advisory Agreement”), by and among the Company, the OP and the Adviser. The Adviser conducts substantially all of the Company’s operations and provides asset management services for its real estate investments. The Company expects it will only have accounting employees while the Advisory Agreement is in effect. All of the Company’s investment decisions are made by the Adviser, subject to general oversight by the Adviser’s investment committee and the Company’s board of directors (the “Board”). The Adviser is wholly owned by NexPoint Advisors, L.P., which is an affiliate of Highland Capital Management, L.P. (the “Sponsor” or “Highland”).

The Company’s investment objectives are to maximize the cash flow and value of properties owned, acquire properties with cash flow growth potential, provide quarterly cash distributions and achieve long-term capital appreciation for its stockholders through targeted management and a value-add program. Consistent with the Company’s policy to acquire assets for both income and capital gain, the Company intends to hold at least majority interests in its properties for long-term appreciation and to engage in the business of directly or indirectly acquiring, owning, and operating well-located multifamily properties with a value-add component in large cities and suburban submarkets of large cities primarily in the Southeastern and Southwestern United States consistent with its investment objectives. Economic and market conditions may influence the Company to hold properties for different periods of time. From time to time, the Company may sell a property if, among other deciding factors, the sale would be in the best interest of its stockholders.

The Company may also participate with third parties in property ownership through limited liability companies (“LLCs”), funds or other types of co-ownership or acquire real estate or interests in real estate in exchange for the issuance of common stock, OP Units, preferred stock or options to purchase stock. These types of investments may permit the Company to own interests in larger assets without unduly restricting diversification, which provides flexibility in structuring the Company’s portfolio.

The Company may allocate up to thirty percent of the portfolio to investments in real estate-related debt and securities with the potential for high current income or total returns. These allocations may include first and second mortgages and subordinated, bridge, mezzanine, construction and other loans, as well as debt securities related to or secured by multifamily real estate and common and preferred equity securities, which may include securities of other REITs or real estate companies.

With the exception of a nominal amount of initial cash funded at inception, the Company did not own any assets prior to March 31, 2015. The business and operations of the Company prior to March 31, 2015 occurred under the predecessor. The predecessor included all of the properties in the Portfolio that were held directly or indirectly by NREO prior to the Spin-Off that occurred on March 31, 2015. However, the Company’s consolidated financial statements reflect operations of the predecessor through March 31, 2015 as if they were incurred by the Company. The predecessor was determined in accordance with the rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). References throughout these consolidated financial statements to the “Company”, “we”, or “our”, include the activity of the predecessor defined above.

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements ~~have been prepared according to the rules and regulations of the SEC. Certain information and note disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared~~are presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) ~~have been condensed or omitted according to such rules and regulations, although management believes that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading.~~

In the opinion of management, all adjustments and eliminations necessary for the fair presentation of the Company’s financial position as of September 30, 2017, and results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 have been included. Such adjustments are normal and recurring in nature. The interim results presented are not necessarily indicative of future financial results. The unaudited information included in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2016 and notes thereto included in its annual report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 15, 2017.

~~The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements are presented in accordance with GAAP.~~. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent liabilities at the dates of the unaudited consolidated financial statements and the amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual amounts realized or paid could differ from those estimates. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. There have been no significant changes to the Company’s significant accounting policies during the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017.~~2019.

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared according to the rules and regulations of the SEC. Certain information and note disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been condensed or omitted according to such rules and regulations, although management believes that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading.

In the opinion of management, all adjustments and eliminations necessary for the fair presentation of the Company’s financial position as of June 30, 2019 and results of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 have been included. Such adjustments are normal and recurring in nature. The unaudited information included in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2018 and notes thereto included in its annual report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 19, 2019.

The Company accounts for subsidiary partnerships, joint ventures and other similar entities in which it holds an ownership interest in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 810, Consolidation. The Company first evaluates whether each entity is a variable interest entity ~~("VIE"~~(“VIE”). Under the VIE model, the Company consolidates an entity when it has control to direct the activities of the VIE and the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits that could potentially be significant to the VIE. Under the voting model, the Company consolidates an entity when it controls the entity through ownership of a majority voting interest. The unaudited consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries, including the ~~OP.~~OP and its subsidiaries.

The Company’s primary operations consist of rental income earned from its residents under lease agreements typically with terms of one year or less. Rental income is recognized when earned. This policy effectively results in income recognition on the straight-line method over the related terms of the leases. Resident reimbursements and other income consist of charges billed to residents for utilities, carport and garage rental, and pets, administrative, application and other fees and are recognized when earned. The Company implemented the provisions of Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASU 2014-09”) as of January 1, 2019 using the modified retrospective approach. The adoption of ASU 2014-09 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements as a substantial portion of its revenue consists of rental income from leasing arrangements, which is specifically excluded from ASU 2014-09.

Upon acquisition of a property, the purchase price and related acquisition costs (“total consideration”) are allocated to land, buildings, improvements, furniture, fixtures, and equipment, and intangible lease assets in accordance with FASB ASC 805, Business ~~Combinations, and Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2017-01,~~ ~~Clarifying the Definition of a Business (Topic 805)~~ ~~(“ASU 2017-01”)~~,Combinations. ~~which the Company early adopted on October 1, 2016 (see “Recent Accounting Pronouncements” below). The Company believes most future acquisition~~Acquisition costs ~~will be~~are capitalized in accordance with ~~ASU 2017-01. Prior to the Company’s adoption of ASU 2017-01, acquisition costs were expensed as incurred.~~FASB ASC 805.

The allocation of total consideration, which is determined using inputs that are classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy established by FASB ASC 820, Fair Value Measurement and Disclosures (~~see~~“ASC 820”) (see Note 7), is based on management’s estimate of the property’s “as-if” vacant fair value and is calculated by using all available information such as the replacement cost of such asset, appraisals, property condition reports, market data and other related information. The allocation of the total consideration to intangible lease assets represents the value associated with the in-place leases, which may include lost rent, leasing commissions, legal and other related costs, which the Company, as buyer of the property, did not have to incur to obtain the residents. If any debt is assumed in an acquisition, the difference between the fair value, which is estimated using inputs that are classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, and the face value of debt is recorded as a premium or discount and amortized as interest expense over the life of the debt assumed.

Real estate assets, including land, buildings, improvements, furniture, fixtures and equipment, and intangible lease assets are stated at historical cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Costs incurred in making repairs and maintaining real estate assets are expensed as incurred. Expenditures for improvements, renovations, and replacements are capitalized at cost. Real estate-related depreciation and amortization are computed on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives as described in the following table:

Construction in progress includes the cost of renovation projects being performed at the various properties. Once a project is complete, the historical cost of the renovation is placed into service in one of the categories above depending on the type of renovation project and is depreciated over the estimated useful lives as described in the table above.

The Company periodically classifies real estate assets as held for sale when certain criteria are met, in accordance with GAAP. At that time, the Company presents the net real estate assets and the net debt associated with the real estate held for sale separately in its consolidated balance sheet, and the Company ceases recording depreciation and amortization expense related to that property. Real estate held for sale is reported at the lower of its carrying amount or its estimated fair value less estimated costs to sell.

~~Certain reclassifications have been made~~ As of June 30, 2019, there are seven properties that are held for sale. Approximately $0.6 million of other assets and approximately $2.6 million of other liabilities related to ~~amounts in~~ the prior year consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income to conform to current year presentations as a result of an accounting policy election to classify certain expenses incurred in connection with the extinguishment or modification of debt separately from interest expense. These expensesheld for sale assets are ~~recorded in loss on extinguishment of debt and modification costs~~included on the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income. As a result, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, interest expense decreased by approximately $0.9 million and $1.7 million, respectively. See Note 6 for additional information.

Substantially all of the Company’s net income (loss) is from investments in real estate properties within the multifamily sector that the Company owns through LLCs. The Company evaluates operating performance on an individual property level and views its real estate assets as one industry segment and, accordingly, its properties are aggregated into one reportable segment.balance sheet.

The Company has elected to be taxed as a REIT under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), and expects to continue to qualify as a REIT. To qualify as a REIT, the Company must meet a number of organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement to distribute annually at least 90% of its “REIT taxable income,” as defined by the Code, to its stockholders. As a REIT, the Company will be subject to federal income tax on its undistributed REIT taxable income and net capital gain and to a 4% nondeductible excise tax on any amount by which distributions it pays with respect to any calendar year are less than the sum of (1) 85% of its ordinary income, (2) 95% of its capital gain net income and (3) 100% of its undistributed income from prior years. The Company intends to operate in such a manner so as to qualify as a REIT, but no assurance can be given that the Company will operate in a manner so as to qualify as a REIT. Taxable income from certain non-REIT activities is managed through a TRS and is subject to applicable federal, state, and local income and margin taxes. The Company ~~has~~had no significant taxes associated with its TRS for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 and ~~2016.~~2018.

If the Company fails to meet these requirements, it could be subject to federal income tax on all of the Company’s taxable income at regular corporate rates for that year. The Company would not be able to deduct distributions paid to stockholders in any year in which it fails to qualify as a REIT. Additionally, the Company will also be disqualified from electing to be taxed as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year during which qualification was lost unless the Company is entitled to relief under specific statutory provisions. As of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2019, the Company believes it is in compliance with all applicable REIT requirements.

The Company evaluates the accounting and disclosure of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in the course of preparing the Company’s tax returns to determine whether the tax positions are “more-likely-than-not” (greater than 50 percent probability) of being sustained by the applicable tax authority. Tax positions not deemed to meet the more-likely-than-not threshold would be recorded as a tax benefit or expense in the current year. The Company’s management is required to analyze all open tax years, as defined by the statute of limitations, for all major jurisdictions, which include federal and certain states. The Company has no examinations in progress and none are expected at this time.

The Company recognizes its tax positions and evaluates them using a two-step process. First, the Company determines whether a tax position is more likely than not to be sustained upon examination, including resolution of any related appeals or litigation processes, based on the technical merits of the position. Second, the Company will determine the amount of benefit to recognize and record the amount that is more likely than not to be realized upon ultimate settlement.

The Company had no material unrecognized tax benefit or expense, accrued interest or penalties as of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017.~~2019. The Company and its subsidiaries are subject to federal income tax as well as income tax of various state and local jurisdictions. The ~~2016~~2018, 2017 and ~~2015~~2016 tax years remain open to examination by tax jurisdictions to which the Company and its subsidiaries are subject. When applicable, the Company recognizes interest and/or penalties related to uncertain tax positions on its consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss).

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, which requires an entity to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. An entity should also disclose sufficient quantitative and qualitative information to enable users of financial statements to understand the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-14, Revenue from Contracts with Customers – Deferral of the Effective Date, which amends ASU 2014-09 to defer the effective date by one year. The new standard is effective for annual and interim periods in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018. Entities are allowed to use either the full or modified retrospective approach when transitioning to the ASU. The Company implemented the provisions of ASU 2014-09 as of January 1, 2019 using the modified retrospective approach. The adoption of ASU 2014-09 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements as a substantial portion of its revenue consists of rental income from leasing arrangements, which is specifically excluded from ASU 2014-09.

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities(“ASU 2016-01”), which changes certain recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure requirements for financial instruments. The ASU requires all equity investments, except those accounted for under the equity method of accounting or resulting in consolidation, to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income. The ASU also simplifies the impairment assessment for equity investments without readily determinable fair values, amends the presentation requirements for changes in the fair value of financial liabilities, requires presentation of financial instruments by measurement category and form of financial asset, and eliminates the requirement to disclose the methods and significant assumptions used in estimating the fair value of financial instruments. The ASU is effective for annual and interim periods in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company implemented the provisions of ASU 2016-01 as of January 1, 2019, and it did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statementsas the Company does not, nor does it expect to, have a material amount of financial assets or financial liabilities that would be subject to the provisions of ASU 2016-01.

Section 107 of the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act (“JOBS ~~Act~~Act”) provides that an emerging growth company can take advantage of the extended transition period provided in Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), for complying with new or revised accounting standards applicable to public companies. In other words, an emerging growth company can delay the adoption of certain accounting standards until those standards would otherwise apply to private companies. The Company has elected to take advantage of this extended transition period. As a result of this election, the Company’s financial statements may not be comparable to companies that comply with public company effective dates for such new or revised standards. ~~The~~At June 30, 2019, the Company’s public float exceeded $700 million, and as such, the transition period will end at December 31, 2019. At the point the transition period ends, the Company ~~may elect to comply with~~will follow the adoption criteria for public ~~company effective dates at any time,~~companies and reflect such ~~election would be irrevocable pursuant to Section 107(b) of~~adoption criteria in the ~~JOBS Act.~~Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the 2019 fiscal year. The following recent accounting pronouncements reflect effective dates that delay the adoption until those standards would otherwise apply to private companies.

In ~~January~~August 2017, the FASB issued ASU ~~2017-01,~~2017-12, ~~Clarifying the Definition of a Business~~Derivatives and Hedging (Topic ~~805)~~815) (“ASU 2017-12”), which clarifies ~~the definition~~hedge accounting requirements, improves disclosure of ~~a business~~hedging arrangements, and ~~provides further guidance~~better aligns risk management activities and financial reporting for evaluating whether a transaction will be accounted for as an acquisition of an asset or a business. The ASU provides a test to determine whether a set of assets and activities acquired is a business. When substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or group of similar identifiable assets, the set is not a business. Under the updated guidance, an acquisition of a single property will likely be treated as an asset acquisition as opposed to a business combination and associated transaction costs will be capitalized rather than expensed as incurred. Additionally, assets acquired, liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest will be measured at their relative fair values.hedging relationships. The Company early adopted ASU ~~2017-01~~2017-12 on ~~October~~January 1, ~~2016,~~2018, on a prospective basis, and there was no material impact on its consolidated financial statements or disclosures. The Company believes most of its future acquisitions of properties will qualify as asset acquisitions and most future transaction costs associated with these acquisitions will be capitalized.

~~In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18,~~ ~~Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash~~, which clarifies the presentation of restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents in the statements of cash flows. Under ASU 2016-18, restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents are included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts shown on the statements of cash flows. The Company adopted ASU 2016-18 during the three months ended December 31, 2016 on amodified retrospective basis. ~~As a result, net~~For cash provided by operating activities decreased by $2.2 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2016. Net cash provided by investing activities increased by $10.6 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2016. Beginning-of-period cash and restricted cash total increased by $46.9 million in 2016. The following is a summary of the Company’s cash and restricted cash total as presented in the consolidated statements of cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 (in thousands):

~~In February 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-02,~~ ~~Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis~~, which changes the way reporting enterprises evaluate whether (1) they should consolidate limited partnerships and similar entities, (2) fees paid to a decision maker or service provider are variable interests in a VIE, and (3) variable interests in a VIE held by related parties of the reporting enterprise require the reporting enterprise to consolidate the VIE. The ASU also significantly changes how to evaluate voting rights for entities

that are not similar to limited partnerships when determining whether the entity is a VIE, which may affect entities for which the decision making rights are conveyed through a contractual arrangement. The Company implemented the provisions of ASU 2015-02 as of January 1, 2017 and there was no material impact on its consolidated financial statements. Upon issuing OP Units to an unaffiliated limited partner on August 1, 2017, the OP became a VIE as such limited partner of the OP lacks substantive kick-out rights and substantive participating rights. The Company is the primary beneficiary of, and continues to consolidate, the OP.

~~In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09,~~ ~~Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting~~, which amends several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, accrual of compensation cost, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. The amendments in this standard must be applied prospectively, retrospectively, orflow hedges existing as of the ~~beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the year~~date of adoption, ~~depending~~the Company eliminated the separate measurement of ineffectiveness by means of a cumulative-effect adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive income (“OCI”) with a corresponding adjustment to the opening balance of accumulated earnings less dividends on ~~the type of amendment. The Company implemented the provisions of ASU 2016-09 as of~~ January 1, ~~2017 and there~~2018. The cumulative-effect adjustment, which eliminated the cumulative ineffectiveness that was ~~no material impact on its consolidated financial statements.~~

~~In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09,~~ ~~Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which requires an entity to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers~~previously reported in interest expense, resulted in an ~~amount that reflects the consideration~~increase to ~~which the entity expects~~OCI of approximately $1.4 million, with a corresponding decrease to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. An entity should also disclose sufficient quantitative and qualitative information to enable users of financial statements to understand the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-14, ~~Revenue from Contracts with Customers – Deferral of the Effective Date~~, which amends ASU 2014-09 to defer the effective date by one year. The new standard is effective for annual and interim periods in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018. Entities are allowed to use either the full or modified retrospective approach when transitioning to the ASU. The Company expects to implement the provisions of ASU 2014-09 as of January 1, 2019 and has not yet selected a transition method. The Company is continuing to evaluate ASU 2014-09 (and related clarifying guidance issued by the FASB); however, the Company does not expect its adoption to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements, as a substantial portion of its revenue consists of rental income from leasing arrangements, which is specifically excluded from ASU 2014-09.

~~In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01,~~ ~~Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities~~, which changes certain recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure requirements for financial instruments. The ASU requires all equity investments, except those accounted for under the equity method of accounting or resulting in consolidation, to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income. The ASU also simplifies the impairment assessment for equity investments without readily determinable fair values, amends the presentation requirements for changes in the fair value of financial liabilities, requires presentation of financial instruments by measurement category and form of financial asset, and eliminates the requirement to disclose the methods and significant assumptions used in estimating the fair value of financial instruments. The ASU is effective for annual and interim periods in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company expects to implement the provisions of ASU 2016-01 as of January 1, 2019, and does not expect the new standard to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.accumulated earnings less dividends.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases(“ASU 2016-02”), which supersedes the current accounting for leases and while retaining two distinct types of leases, finance and operating, (1) requires lessees to record a right of use asset and a related liability for the rights and obligations associated with a lease, regardless of lease classification, and recognize lease expense in a manner similar to current accounting, (2) eliminates most real estate specific lease provisions and (3) aligns many of the underlying lessor model principles with those in the new revenue standard. Leases with a term of 12 months or less will be accounted for similar to existing guidance for operating leases today. ~~The~~As noted above, at the point the transition period ends, the Company will follow the adoption criteria for public companies. As such, the ASU is now effective for ~~annual~~the Company to adopt as of January 1, 2019, and ~~interim periods~~will be presented accordingly in ~~fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018.~~the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the 2019 Fiscal Year. Entities are required to use a modified retrospective approach when transitioning to the ASU for leases that exist as of or are entered into after the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements. ~~The Company expects to implement the provisions of ASU 2016-02 as of January 1, 2019 in conjunction with the adoption of ASU 2014-09 discussed above.~~ As lessors, substantially all of the Company’s agreements have a term of 12 months or less. ~~Based on a preliminary assessment,~~For lessors, accounting for leases under the ~~Company expects most of its~~new standard will be substantially the same as existing guidance for sales-type leases, direct financing leases, and operating leases, ~~will be subject to~~but eliminates current real estate specific provisions and changes the ~~new guidance and recognized as operating lease liabilities and right-of-use assets upon adoption, resulting in an immaterial increase in the assets and liabilities on its consolidated balance sheets.~~treatment of initial direct costs. The Company is continuing its evaluation, which may identify additional impacts this standard will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In July 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-11, Leases – Targeted Improvements (“ASU 2018-11”), which provides entities with relief from the costs of implementing certain aspects of ASU 2016-02. The ASU provides a practical expedient which allows lessors to not separate lease and non-lease components in a contract and allocate the consideration in the contract to the separate components if both (i) the timing and pattern of revenue recognition for the non-lease component and the related lease component are the same and (ii) the combined single lease component would be classified as an operating lease. The Company intends to elect the practical expedient to account for lease and non-lease components as a single component in lease contracts where the Company is the lessor. The ASU also provides a transition option that permits entities to not recast the comparative periods presented when transitioning to the standard. The Company also intends to elect the transition option.

In August 2018, the SEC adopted SEC Release No. 33-10532, Disclosure Update and Simplification (the “SEC Release”), which amends certain disclosure requirements that were redundant, duplicative, overlapping or superseded by other SEC disclosure requirements or GAAP. The amendments generally eliminated or otherwise reduced certain disclosure requirements of various SEC rules and regulations. However, in some cases, the amendments require additional information to be disclosed, including changes in stockholders’ equity in interim periods. Under the SEC Release, registrants will be required to disclose in interim periods on Form 10-Q the changes in each caption of stockholders’ equity and noncontrolling interests for the current and comparative year-to-date periods, with subtotals for each interim period and the amount of dividends per share for each class of shares. The amendments require registrants, including smaller reporting companies, to provide information as prescribed by Rule 3-04 of Regulation S-X. Therefore, the interim disclosures of changes in stockholders’ equity, including dividends per share amounts, may be given in a note to the financial statements or in a separate financial statement. Under Rule 3-04, the interim disclosures of the changes in stockholders’ equity should be in the form of a reconciliation of the beginning balance to the ending balance for each period for which an income statement is required to be filed, with all significant reconciling items described by appropriate captions. The reconciliation should also reflect any adjustments to the balance at the beginning of the earliest period presented for items retroactively applied to periods prior to that period. The Company adopted the provisions of the SEC Release on September 30, 2018, on a retrospective basis.

The Company ~~has in~~conducts its operations through the ~~past and may in~~OP, which owns the ~~future invest in joint ventures.~~properties through single asset limited liability companies that are special purpose entities (“SPEs”). The Company consolidates the ~~entities~~SPEs that it controls as well as any VIEs where it is the primary beneficiary. In connection with its indirect equity investments in the properties acquired, the Company, through the OP and the TRS, directly or indirectly holds 100% of the membership interests in ~~single-asset LLCs~~SPEs that directly own the properties. All of the properties the ~~Company has acquired~~SPEs own are consolidated in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. The assets of each entity can only be used to settle obligations of that particular entity, and the creditors of each entity have no recourse to the assets of other entities or the Company.

Additionally, the Company has in the past and may in the future enter into purchase and sale transactions structured as reverse like-kind exchanges (“1031 Exchanges”) under Section 1031 of the ~~Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”).~~Code. For a reverse 1031 Exchange in which the Company purchases a new property prior to selling the property to be matched in the like-kind exchange (the Company refers to athe new property being acquired in the 1031 Exchange prior to the sale of the related property as a “Parked Asset”), legal title to the Parked Asset is held by an Exchange Accommodation Titleholder (“EAT”) engaged to execute the 1031 Exchange until the sale transaction and the 1031 Exchange are completed. The Company, through a wholly owned subsidiary, enters into a master lease agreement with the EAT whereby the EAT leases the acquired property and all other rights acquired in connection with the acquisition to the Company. The term of the master lease agreement is ~~until~~ the earlier of the completion of the reverse 1031 Exchange or 180 days from the date that the property was acquired. The EAT is classified as a VIE as it does not have sufficient equity investment at risk to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support. The Company consolidates the EAT as its primary beneficiary because it has the ability to control the activities that most significantly impact the ~~EAT's~~EAT’s economic performance and the Company retains all of the legal and economic benefits and obligations related to the Parked Assets prior to completion of the 1031 Exchange. As such, the Parked Assets are included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements as VIEs until legal title is transferred to the Company upon either completion of the 1031 Exchange or termination of the master lease ~~agreements,~~agreement, at which time they will be consolidated as wholly owned subsidiaries.

As of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2019, the Company, ~~was invested in 32 properties.~~through the OP and the wholly owned TRS, owned 39 properties through single-asset LLCs. The following table represents the Company’s ~~investments~~ownership in each property by virtue of its 100% ownership of the single-asset LLCs that directly own the title to each property as of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 and December 31, ~~2016:~~2018:

															Effective Ownership Percentage at
Property Name		Location	Year Acquired	Effective Ownership Percentage at September 30, 2017				Effective Ownership Percentage at December 31, 2016					Location	Year Acquired	June 30, 2019			December 31, 2018
The Miramar Apartments		Dallas, Texas	2013		—		(1)		100	%
Arbors on Forest Ridge		Bedford, Texas	2014		100	%	(2)		90	%			Bedford, Texas	2014		100	%		100	%
Cutter’s Point		Richardson, Texas	2014		100	%	(2)		90	%
Cutter's Point													Richardson, Texas	2014		100	%		100	%
Eagle Crest		Irving, Texas	2014		100	%	(2)		90	%			Irving, Texas	2014		100	%		100	%
Silverbrook		Grand Prairie, Texas	2014		100	%	(2)		90	%			Grand Prairie, Texas	2014		100	%		100	%
Timberglen	(3)	Dallas, Texas	2014		100	%	(2)		90	%
Toscana		Dallas, Texas	2014		—		(1)		90	%
The Grove at Alban		Frederick, Maryland	2014		—		(1)		76	%	(4)
Edgewater at Sandy Springs		Atlanta, Georgia	2014		100	%	(2)		90	%		(1)	Atlanta, Georgia	2014		100	%		100	%
Beechwood Terrace		Nashville, Tennessee	2014		100	%	(2)		90	%			Antioch, Tennessee	2014		100	%		100	%
Willow Grove		Nashville, Tennessee	2014		100	%	(2)		90	%			Nashville, Tennessee	2014		100	%		100	%
Woodbridge		Nashville, Tennessee	2014		100	%	(2)		90	%			Nashville, Tennessee	2014		100	%		100	%
Abbington Heights		Antioch, Tennessee	2014		100	%	(2)		90	%	(4)	(1)	Antioch, Tennessee	2014		100	%		100	%
The Summit at Sabal Park		Tampa, Florida	2014		100	%	(2)		90	%	(4)		Tampa, Florida	2014		100	%		100	%
Courtney Cove		Tampa, Florida	2014		100	%	(2)		90	%	(4)		Tampa, Florida	2014		100	%		100	%
Radbourne Lake		Charlotte, North Carolina	2014		100	%	(2)		90	%	(4)		Charlotte, North Carolina	2014		100	%		100	%
Timber Creek		Charlotte, North Carolina	2014		100	%	(2)		90	%	(4)		Charlotte, North Carolina	2014		100	%		100	%
Belmont at Duck Creek		Garland, Texas	2014		100	%	(2)		90	%	(4)	(1)	Garland, Texas	2014		100	%		100	%
The Arbors		Tucker, Georgia	2014		—		(1)		90	%	(4)
The Crossings		Marietta, Georgia	2014		—		(1)		90	%	(4)
The Crossings at Holcomb Bridge		Roswell, Georgia	2014		—		(1)		90	%	(4)
The Knolls		Marietta, Georgia	2014		—		(1)		90	%	(4)
Regatta Bay		Seabrook, Texas	2014		—		(1)		90	%	(4)
Sabal Palm at Lake Buena Vista		Orlando, Florida	2014		100	%	(2)		90	%	(4)		Orlando, Florida	2014		100	%		100	%
Southpoint Reserve at Stoney Creek	(3)	Fredericksburg, Virginia	2014		100	%	(2)		85	%	(4)	(1)	Fredericksburg, Virginia	2014		100	%		100	%
Cornerstone		Orlando, Florida	2015		100	%	(2)		90	%	(4)		Orlando, Florida	2015		100	%		100	%
Twelve 6 Ten at the Park		Dallas, Texas	2015		—		(1)		90	%	(4)
The Preserve at Terrell Mill		Marietta, Georgia	2015		100	%	(2)		90	%	(4)		Marietta, Georgia	2015		100	%		100	%
The Ashlar		Dallas, Texas	2015		100	%	(2)		90	%	(4)	(1)	Dallas, Texas	2015		100	%		100	%
Heatherstone		Dallas, Texas	2015		100	%	(2)		90	%	(4)	(1)	Dallas, Texas	2015		100	%		100	%
Versailles		Dallas, Texas	2015		100	%	(2)		90	%	(4)		Dallas, Texas	2015		100	%		100	%
Seasons 704 Apartments		West Palm Beach, Florida	2015		100	%	(2)		90	%	(4)		West Palm Beach, Florida	2015		100	%		100	%
Madera Point		Mesa, Arizona	2015		100	%	(2)		95	%			Mesa, Arizona	2015		100	%		100	%
The Pointe at the Foothills		Mesa, Arizona	2015		100	%	(2)		95	%		(1)	Mesa, Arizona	2015		100	%		100	%
Venue at 8651		Fort Worth, Texas	2015		100	%	(2)		95	%			Fort Worth, Texas	2015		100	%		100	%
Parc500		West Palm Beach, Florida	2016		100	%	(2)		91	%			West Palm Beach, Florida	2016		100	%		100	%
The Colonnade		Phoenix, Arizona	2016		100	%	(2)		97	%
The Venue on Camelback												(6)	Phoenix, Arizona	2016		100	%		100	%
Old Farm		Houston, Texas	2016		100	%	(2)		100	%	(5)		Houston, Texas	2016		100	%		100	%
Stone Creek at Old Farm		Houston, Texas	2016		100	%	(2)		100	%	(5)		Houston, Texas	2016		100	%		100	%
Hollister Place		Houston, Texas	2017		100	%			—		(6)		Houston, Texas	2017		100	%		100	%
Rockledge Apartments		Marietta, Georgia	2017		100	%			—		(6)		Marietta, Georgia	2017		100	%		100	%
Atera Apartments												(2)	Dallas, Texas	2017		100	%		100	%
Cedar Pointe												(3)	Antioch, Tennessee	2018		100	%		100	%
Crestmont Reserve													Dallas, Texas	2018		100	%		100	%
Brandywine I & II													Nashville, Tennessee	2018		100	%		100	%
Bella Vista												(4)	Phoenix, Arizona	2019		100	%		—		(5)
The Enclave												(4)	Tempe, Arizona	2019		100	%		—		(5)
The Heritage												(4)	Phoenix, Arizona	2019		100	%		—		(5)
Summers Landing													Fort Worth, Texas	2019		100	%		—		(5)

As of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2019, the Company iswas invested in a total of 3239 multifamily properties, as listed below:

																						Average Effective Monthly Rent Per Unit (1) as of					% Occupied (2) as of
Property Name		Rentable Square Footage (in thousands)		Number of Units		Date Acquired	Average Effective Monthly Rent Per Unit (1)		% Occupied as of September 30, 2017 (2)			% Occupied as of December 31, 2016 (2)					Rentable Square Footage (in thousands)		Number of Units		Date Acquired	June 30, 2019		December 31, 2018			June 30, 2019			December 31, 2018
Arbors on Forest Ridge			155	210		1/31/2014		859		95.2	%		92.9	%				155	210		1/31/2014	$	874	$	870			95.2	%		95.2	%
Cutter’s Point			198	196		1/31/2014		1,052		94.4	%		93.9	%
Cutter's Point																		198	196		1/31/2014		1,138		1,109			94.9	%		95.4	%
Eagle Crest			396	447		1/31/2014		876		95.3	%		94.4	%				396	447		1/31/2014		946		922			95.7	%		94.9	%
Silverbrook			526	642		1/31/2014		781		95.6	%		93.5	%				526	642		1/31/2014		868		835			96.0	%		94.9	%
Timberglen	(3)		221	304		1/31/2014		846		95.1	%		92.8	%
Edgewater at Sandy Springs			727	760		7/18/2014		929		94.5	%		94.5	%		(3)		727	760		7/18/2014		976		950			94.6	%		94.1	%
Beechwood Terrace			272	300		7/21/2014		921		96.0	%		95.3	%				272	300		7/21/2014		938		933			94.0	%		93.7	%
Willow Grove			229	244		7/21/2014		912		93.4	%		96.7	%				229	244		7/21/2014		991		960			94.3	%		95.1	%
Woodbridge			247	220		7/21/2014		945		95.5	%		87.7	%				247	220		7/21/2014		1,052		1,028			94.1	%		94.1	%
Abbington Heights			239	274		8/1/2014		879		93.8	%		95.3	%		(3)		239	274		8/1/2014		891		889			94.9	%		92.0	%
The Summit at Sabal Park			205	252		8/20/2014		907		95.2	%		90.9	%				205	252		8/20/2014		986		955			93.7	%		94.4	%
Courtney Cove			225	324		8/20/2014		817		93.8	%		94.4	%				225	324		8/20/2014		912		895			94.4	%		95.7	%
Radbourne Lake			247	225		9/30/2014		1,059		93.3	%		96.9	%				247	225		9/30/2014		1,100		1,082			95.6	%		96.0	%
Timber Creek			248	352		9/30/2014		819		95.2	%		95.5	%				248	352		9/30/2014		879		847			96.0	%		92.6	%
Belmont at Duck Creek			198	240		9/30/2014		990		95.4	%		95.0	%		(3)		198	240		9/30/2014		1,050		1,030			94.2	%		92.1	%
Sabal Palm at Lake Buena Vista			371	400		11/5/2014		1,158		93.5	%		95.0	%				371	400		11/5/2014		1,256		1,255			95.5	%		96.5	%
Southpoint Reserve at Stoney Creek	(3)		116	156		12/18/2014		1,069		96.8	%		92.9	%		(3)		116	156		12/18/2014		1,133		1,093			97.4	%		98.1	%
Cornerstone			318	430		1/15/2015		910		94.9	%		95.8	%				318	430		1/15/2015		1,042		1,007			93.3	%		94.2	%
The Preserve at Terrell Mill			692	752		2/6/2015		850		93.1	%		92.0	%				692	752		2/6/2015		954		921			93.4	%		94.8	%
The Ashlar			206	264		2/26/2015		819		92.4	%		91.3	%		(3)		206	264		2/26/2015		884		859			93.2	%		94.3	%
Heatherstone			116	152		2/26/2015		838		94.1	%		92.8	%		(3)		116	152		2/26/2015		888		874			96.1	%		94.7	%
Versailles			301	388		2/26/2015		860		95.1	%		93.0	%				301	388		2/26/2015		908		884			91.5	%		96.4	%
Seasons 704 Apartments			217	222		4/15/2015		1,056		95.9	%		95.0	%				217	222		4/15/2015		1,127		1,130			94.6	%		96.8	%
Madera Point			193	256		8/5/2015		797		93.8	%		93.8	%				193	256		8/5/2015		919		866			96.1	%		94.5	%
The Pointe at the Foothills			473	528		8/5/2015		817		92.2	%		92.2	%		(3)		473	528		8/5/2015		909		859			95.5	%		95.1	%
Venue at 8651			289	333		10/30/2015		800		94.3	%		90.4	%				289	333		10/30/2015		896		875			96.1	%		92.8	%
Parc500			266	217		7/27/2016		1,167		93.5	%		93.5	%				266	217		7/27/2016		1,275		1,254			94.9	%		94.9	%
The Colonnade			256	415		10/11/2016		695		92.0	%		88.0	%
The Venue on Camelback																		256	415		10/11/2016		751		719			93.0	%		93.3	%
Old Farm			697	734		12/29/2016		1,177		92.8	%		93.6	%				697	734		12/29/2016		1,168		1,176			93.5	%		92.9	%
Stone Creek at Old Farm			186	190		12/29/2016		1,186		93.7	%		93.2	%				186	190		12/29/2016		1,184		1,173			93.2	%		96.8	%
Hollister Place			246	260		2/1/2017		969		93.5	%		—		(4)			246	260		2/1/2017		990		984			95.4	%		93.5	%
Rockledge Apartments			802	708		6/30/2017		1,153		91.9	%		—		(4)			802	708		6/30/2017		1,224		1,186			94.5	%		94.6	%
Atera Apartments																		334	380		10/25/2017		1,245		1,232			96.8	%		97.4	%
Cedar Pointe																		224	210		8/24/2018		1,053		1,051			91.4	%		95.7	%
Crestmont Reserve																		199	242		9/26/2018		906		914			94.6	%		94.6	%
Brandywine I & II																		414	632		9/26/2018		970		957			92.9	%		93.8	%
Bella Vista																		243	248		1/28/2019		1,221		—	(4)		93.5	%		—		(4)
The Enclave																		194	204		1/28/2019		1,266		—	(4)		93.6	%		—		(4)
The Heritage																		199	204		1/28/2019		1,248		—	(4)		92.6	%		—		(4)
Summers Landing																		139	196		6/7/2019		922		—	(4)		94.9	%		—		(4)
			10,078		11,395													11,803		13,407

As of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2019, the major components of the Company’s investments in multifamily properties were as follows (in thousands):

Operating Properties	Land		Buildings and Improvements			Intangible Lease Assets			Construction in Progress		Furniture, Fixtures and Equipment			Totals				Land		Buildings and Improvements			Intangible Lease Assets			Construction in Progress		Furniture, Fixtures and Equipment			Totals
Arbors on Forest Ridge	$	2,330	$	11,073		$	—		$	—	$	794		$	14,197			$	2,330	$	11,498		$	—		$	—	$	1,160		$	14,988
Cutter’s Point		3,330		12,995			—			—		946			17,271
Cutter's Point																			3,330		13,406			—			13		1,470			18,219
Eagle Crest		5,450		22,227			—			—		1,231			28,908				5,450		23,557			—			—		1,652			30,659
Silverbrook		4,860		25,643			—			—		2,363			32,866				4,860		27,375			—			—		3,514			35,749
Edgewater at Sandy Springs		14,290		43,959			—			9		4,057			62,315
Beechwood Terrace		1,390		20,662			—			78		1,229			23,359				1,390		21,545			—			—		1,877			24,812
Willow Grove		3,940		10,739			—			—		882			15,561				3,940		11,065			—			—		1,356			16,361
Woodbridge		3,651		12,995			—			1		1,029			17,676				3,650		13,224			—			—		1,721			18,595
Abbington Heights		1,770		16,602			—			112		1,101			19,585
The Summit at Sabal Park		5,770		13,355			—			—		1,107			20,232				5,770		13,562			—			—		1,481			20,813
Courtney Cove		5,880		12,913			—			—		1,055			19,848				5,880		13,371			—			—		1,397			20,648
Radbourne Lake		2,440		21,801			—			5		1,255			25,501				2,440		22,336			—			51		1,717			26,544
Timber Creek		11,260		13,429			—			—		1,086			25,775				11,260		13,894			—			28		2,016			27,198
Belmont at Duck Creek		1,910		17,157			—			—		1,170			20,237
Sabal Palm at Lake Buena Vista		7,580		41,173			—			—		1,024			49,777				7,580		41,561			—			—		1,423			50,564
Cornerstone		1,500		30,357			—			—		1,395			33,252				1,500		30,538			—			—		2,164			34,202
The Preserve at Terrell Mill		10,170		48,609			—			—		3,895			62,674				10,170		49,160			—			—		5,535			64,865
The Ashlar		4,090		12,631			—			—		1,459			18,180
Heatherstone		2,320		7,862			—			—		909			11,091
Versailles		6,720		19,735			—			6		2,155			28,616				6,720		21,832			—			—		3,200			31,752
Seasons 704 Apartments		7,480		14,071			—			2		867			22,420				7,480		14,274			—			—		1,372			23,126
Madera Point		4,920		17,369			—			43		1,130			23,462				4,920		17,588			—			—		1,573			24,081
The Pointe at the Foothills		4,840		46,402			—			108		1,669			53,019
Venue at 8651		2,350		16,910			—			813		1,744			21,817				2,350		18,130			—			—		2,717			23,197
Parc500		3,860		19,297			—			589		1,217			24,963				3,860		20,762			—			73		2,867			27,562
The Colonnade		8,340		36,677			—			55		805			45,877
The Venue on Camelback																			8,340		37,818			—			154		1,829			48,141
Old Farm		11,078		69,718			—			29		1,304			82,129				11,078		70,557			—			—		2,028			83,663
Stone Creek at Old Farm		3,493		19,123			—			—		350			22,966				3,493		19,407			—			—		519			23,419
Hollister Place		2,782		20,719			—			—		593			24,094				2,782		21,658			—			25		1,750			26,215
Rockledge Apartments		17,451		92,296			3,021			—		1,369			114,137				17,451		95,928			—			—		4,035			117,414
Atera Apartments																			22,370		37,251			—			—		1,352			60,973
Cedar Pointe																	(1)		2,372		24,053			—			—		711			27,136
Crestmont Reserve																			4,124		20,138			—			64		735			25,061
Brandywine I & II																			6,237		72,169			—			61		1,888			80,355
Bella Vista																	(2)		10,942		36,417			919			47		806			49,131
The Enclave																	(2)		11,046		29,813			769			49		639			42,316
The Heritage																	(2)		6,835		34,147			750			47		672			42,451
Summers Landing																			1,798		16,737			533			—		369			19,437
		167,245		768,499			3,021			1,850		41,190			981,805				203,748		914,771			2,971			612		57,545			1,179,647
Accumulated depreciation and amortization		—		(57,876	)		(1,007	)		—		(19,504	)		(78,387	)			—		(90,401	)		(2,120	)		—		(34,597	)		(127,118	)
Total Operating Properties	$	167,245	$	710,623		$	2,014		$	1,850	$	21,686		$	903,418			$	203,748	$	824,370		$	851		$	612	$	22,948		$	1,052,529

Held For Sale Properties
Timberglen		2,510		14,718			—			—		1,049			18,277
Held For Sale Property
Southpoint Reserve at Stoney Creek		6,120		11,252			—			—		663			18,035				6,120		11,399			—			—		847			18,366
		8,630		25,970			—			—		1,712			36,312
Edgewater at Sandy Springs																			14,290		44,608			—			146		5,438			64,482
Abbington Heights																			1,770		17,202			—			—		1,614			20,586
Belmont at Duck Creek																			1,910		17,455			—			4		1,527			20,896
The Ashlar																			4,090		12,863			—			—		2,145			19,098
Heatherstone																			2,320		8,154			—			—		1,263			11,737
The Pointe at the Foothills																			4,840		47,012			—			—		2,256			54,108
Accumulated depreciation and amortization		—		(2,630	)		—			—		(767	)		(3,397	)			—		(22,932	)		—			—		(10,373	)		(33,305	)
Total Held For Sale Properties	$	8,630	$	23,340		$	—		$	—	$	945		$	32,915
Total Held For Sale Property																		$	35,340	$	135,761		$	—		$	150	$	4,717		$	175,968

Total	$	175,875	$	733,963		$	2,014		$	1,850	$	22,631		$	936,333			$	239,088	$	960,131		$	851		$	762	$	27,665		$	1,228,497

As of December 31, ~~2016,~~2018, the major components of the Company’s investments in multifamily properties were as follows (in thousands):

Operating Properties	Land		Buildings and Improvements			Intangible Lease Assets			Construction in Progress		Furniture, Fixtures and Equipment			Totals				Land		Buildings and Improvements			Intangible Lease Assets			Construction in Progress		Furniture, Fixtures and Equipment			Totals
Arbors on Forest Ridge	$	2,330	$	11,014		$	—		$	3	$	717		$	14,064			$	2,330	$	11,319		$	—		$	—	$	1,047		$	14,696
Cutter's Point		3,330		12,871			—			—		810			17,011				3,330		13,347			—			—		1,320			17,997
Eagle Crest		5,450		21,990			—			—		1,052			28,492				5,450		22,969			—			—		1,563			29,982
Silverbrook		4,860		25,335			—			—		1,996			32,191				4,860		26,485			—			60		3,230			34,635
Timberglen		2,510		14,527			—			—		894			17,931
Edgewater at Sandy Springs		14,290		43,709			—			123		3,295			61,417				14,290		44,186			—			349		5,083			63,908
Beechwood Terrace		1,390		20,561			—			—		940			22,891				1,390		21,123			—			31		1,670			24,214
Willow Grove		3,940		10,672			—			—		668			15,280				3,940		10,829			—			—		1,231			16,000
Woodbridge		3,650		12,708			—			215		759			17,332				3,650		13,125			—			—		1,536			18,311
Abbington Heights		1,770		16,426			—			75		916			19,187				1,770		17,140			—			—		1,539			20,449
The Summit at Sabal Park		5,770		13,342			—			9		956			20,077				5,770		13,447			—			43		1,347			20,607
Courtney Cove		5,880		12,886			—			42		910			19,718				5,880		13,170			—			—		1,268			20,318
Radbourne Lake		2,440		21,445			—			257		1,025			25,167				2,440		22,138			—			72		1,536			26,186
Timber Creek		11,260		13,252			—			69		864			25,445				11,260		13,582			—			—		1,556			26,398
Belmont at Duck Creek		1,910		17,034			—			—		941			19,885				1,910		17,397			—			—		1,471			20,778
The Arbors		1,730		6,587			—			5		413			8,735
The Crossings		3,982		17,662			—			155		1,429			23,228
The Crossings at Holcomb Bridge		5,560		10,925			—			—		1,178			17,663
The Knolls		3,410		17,707			—			8		1,615			22,740
Regatta Bay		1,660		16,155			—			89		891			18,795
Sabal Palm at Lake Buena Vista		7,580		41,147			—			3		874			49,604				7,580		41,336			—			—		1,280			50,196
Cornerstone		1,500		30,354			—			29		906			32,789				1,500		30,513			—			—		1,885			33,898
The Preserve at Terrell Mill		10,170		48,163			—			516		2,872			61,721				10,170		49,091			—			57		4,843			64,161
The Ashlar		4,090		12,348			—			124		1,129			17,691				4,090		12,845			—			—		2,017			18,952
Heatherstone		2,320		7,521			—			224		749			10,814				2,320		8,132			—			—		1,199			11,651
Versailles		6,720		20,267			—			286		1,597			28,870				6,720		21,513			—			—		3,033			31,266
Seasons 704 Apartments		7,480		14,043			—			—		696			22,219				7,480		14,223			—			—		1,288			22,991
Madera Point		4,920		17,079			—			15		865			22,879				4,920		17,570			—			—		1,431			23,921
The Pointe at the Foothills		4,840		45,975			—			157		1,289			52,261				4,840		46,998			—			—		2,078			53,916
Venue at 8651		2,350		16,815			—			311		1,162			20,638				2,350		18,084			—			—		2,499			22,933
Parc500		3,860		18,700			491			113		504			23,668				3,860		20,692			—			37		2,600			27,189
The Colonnade		8,340		35,473			723			—		376			44,912				8,340		37,086			—			567		1,604			47,597
Old Farm		11,078		69,580			3,354			—		1,052			85,064				11,078		70,471			—			—		1,800			83,349
Stone Creek at Old Farm		3,493		19,101			572			—		276			23,442				3,493		19,394			—			—		467			23,354
Hollister Place																			2,782		21,389			—			135		1,410			25,716
Rockledge Apartments																			17,451		95,484			—			428		3,314			116,677
Atera Apartments																			22,371		36,563			—			86		1,151			60,171
Cedar Pointe																	(1)		2,371		23,458			600			16		441			26,886
Crestmont Reserve																			4,124		19,544			687			—		504			24,859
Brandywine I & II																			6,237		70,961			1,762			—		1,215			80,175
		165,863		733,374			5,140			2,828		36,616			943,821				202,347		935,604			3,049			1,881		61,456			1,204,337
Accumulated depreciation and amortization		—		(46,044	)		(650	)		—		(13,520	)		(60,214	)			—		(95,364	)		(1,625	)		—		(37,135	)		(134,124	)
Total Operating Properties	$	165,863	$	687,330		$	4,490		$	2,828	$	23,096		$	883,607			$	202,347	$	840,240		$	1,424		$	1,881	$	24,321		$	1,070,213

Held For Sale Properties
The Grove at Alban		3,640		19,033			—			—		1,318			23,991
The Miramar Apartments		1,580		8,870			—			—		711			11,161
Toscana		1,730		7,341			—			3		684			9,758
Southpoint Reserve at Stoney Creek		6,120		11,218			—			31		605			17,974				6,120		11,319			—			—		787			18,226
Twelve 6 Ten at the Park		3,610		18,088			—			21		925			22,644
		16,680		64,550			—			55		4,243			85,528
Accumulated depreciation and amortization		—		(4,896	)		—			—		(1,202	)		(6,098	)			—		(736	)		—			—		(161	)		(897	)
Total Held For Sale Properties	$	16,680	$	59,654		$	—		$	55	$	3,041		$	79,430			$	6,120	$	10,583		$	—		$	—	$	626		$	17,329

Total	$	182,543	$	746,984		$	4,490		$	2,883	$	26,137		$	963,037			$	208,467	$	850,823		$	1,424		$	1,881	$	24,947		$	1,087,542

Depreciation expense was ~~$10.0~~$11.8 million and ~~$8.5~~$10.8 million for the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 and ~~2016,~~2018, respectively. Depreciation expense was ~~$29.5~~$24.9 million and ~~$25.5~~$21.6 million for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 and ~~2016,~~2018, respectively.

Amortization expense related to the Company’s intangible lease assets was ~~$1.2~~$1.3 million and $0.2 million for the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 and ~~2016, respectively.~~2018. Amortization expense related to the Company’s intangible lease assets was ~~$6.4~~$3.5 million and ~~$0.9~~$0.8 million for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 and ~~2016,~~2018, respectively. Amortization expense related to the Company’s intangible lease assets for all acquisitions completed through ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 is expected to be ~~$2.0~~$0.9 million for the remainder of the year ended December 31, ~~2017.~~2019. Due to the six-month useful life attributable to intangible lease assets, the value of intangible lease assets on any acquisition prior to ~~March~~December 31, ~~2017~~2018 has been fully amortized and the assets and related accumulated amortization have been written off as of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017.~~2019.

The ~~following~~Company acquired four properties during the six months ended June 30, 2019, as detailed in the table ~~presents the Company’s~~below (dollars in thousands); there were no acquisitions of real estate during the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017 (dollars in thousands); the Company acquired one property for approximately $22.4 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 (see Notes 3, 4 and 6).~~ 2018.

~~The following table presents the Company’s~~There were no sales of real estate during the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017 (in thousands).~~2019. The Company sold ~~seven properties~~one property for approximately ~~$134.0~~$30.0 million during the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016.~~2018.

In August and September 2017, parts of Texas and Florida were hit by two hurricanes, causing severe property damage in the affected areas. As of September 30, 2017, the Company owned three properties in the Houston area, two properties in the Miami area,

two properties in the Tampa Bay area, and two properties in the Orlando area. The Company’s properties in these areas suffered minimal damage, which the Company estimates to be approximately $40,000.

The following table contains summary information concerning the mortgage debt of the Company as of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 (dollars in thousands):

Operating Properties		Type	Term (months)		Outstanding Principal (1)				Interest Rate (2)		Maturity Date		Type	Term (months)		Outstanding Principal (1)				Interest Rate (2)	Maturity Date
Arbors on Forest Ridge	(3)	Floating		84	$	13,130				2.91%	7/1/2024	(3)	Floating		84	$	13,130			4.08%	7/1/2024
Cutter's Point	(3)	Floating		84		16,640				2.91%	7/1/2024	(3)	Floating		84		16,640			4.08%	7/1/2024
Eagle Crest	(3)	Floating		84		29,510				2.91%	7/1/2024	(3)	Floating		84		29,510			4.08%	7/1/2024
Silverbrook	(3)	Floating		84		30,590				2.91%	7/1/2024	(3)	Floating		84		30,590			4.08%	7/1/2024
Edgewater at Sandy Springs	(3)	Floating		84		52,000				2.91%	7/1/2024
Beechwood Terrace	(3)	Floating		84		20,150				2.91%	7/1/2024	(3)	Floating		84		23,365			3.84%	9/1/2025
Willow Grove	(3)	Floating		84		14,818				3.01%	7/1/2024	(3)	Floating		84		14,818			4.18%	7/1/2024
Woodbridge	(3)	Floating		84		13,677				3.01%	7/1/2024	(3)	Floating		84		13,677			4.18%	7/1/2024
The Summit at Sabal Park	(3)	Floating		84		13,560				2.85%	7/1/2024	(3)	Floating		84		13,560			4.02%	7/1/2024
Courtney Cove	(3)	Floating		84		13,680				2.85%	7/1/2024	(3)	Floating		84		13,680			4.02%	7/1/2024
The Preserve at Terrell Mill	(3)	Floating		84		42,480				2.85%	7/1/2024	(3)	Floating		84		42,480			4.02%	7/1/2024
The Ashlar	(3)	Floating		84		14,520				2.85%	7/1/2024
Heatherstone	(3)	Floating		84		8,880				2.85%	7/1/2024
Versailles	(3)	Floating		84		23,880				2.85%	7/1/2024	(3)	Floating		84		23,880			4.02%	7/1/2024
Seasons 704 Apartments	(3)	Floating		84		17,460				2.85%	7/1/2024	(3)	Floating		84		17,460			4.02%	7/1/2024
Madera Point	(3)	Floating		84		15,150				2.85%	7/1/2024	(3)	Floating		84		15,150			4.02%	7/1/2024
The Pointe at the Foothills	(3)	Floating		84		34,800				2.85%	7/1/2024
Venue at 8651	(3)	Floating		84		13,734				3.01%	7/1/2024	(3)	Floating		84		13,734			4.18%	7/1/2024
The Colonnade	(3)	Floating		84		28,093				2.91%	7/1/2024
The Venue on Camelback												(3)	Floating		84		28,093			4.08%	7/1/2024
Old Farm	(3)	Floating		84		52,886				2.91%	7/1/2024	(3)	Floating		84		52,886			4.08%	7/1/2024
Stone Creek at Old Farm	(3)	Floating		84		15,274				2.91%	7/1/2024	(3)	Floating		84		15,274			4.08%	7/1/2024
Timber Creek	(4)	Floating		120		19,482				3.05%	10/1/2024	(3)	Floating		84		24,100			3.66%	10/1/2025
Radbourne Lake	(4)	Floating		120		19,213				3.04%	10/1/2024	(3)	Floating		84		20,000			3.69%	10/1/2025
Sabal Palm at Lake Buena Vista	(4)	Floating		120		37,680				3.04%	12/1/2024	(3)	Floating		84		42,100			3.70%	9/1/2025
Abbington Heights	(5)	Fixed		120		10,053				3.79%	9/1/2022
Belmont at Duck Creek	(6)	Fixed		84		10,995				4.68%	9/1/2018
Cornerstone	(7)	Fixed		120		22,771				4.24%	3/1/2023	(4)	Fixed		120		22,001			4.24%	3/1/2023
Parc500	(8)	Fixed		120		15,793				4.49%	8/1/2025	(5)	Fixed		120		15,353			4.49%	8/1/2025
Hollister Place	(3)	Floating		84		13,475				3.47%	2/1/2024	(3)	Floating		84		14,811			3.74%	10/1/2025
Rockledge Apartments	(3)	Floating		84		68,100				2.80%	7/1/2024	(3)	Floating		84		68,100			3.97%	7/1/2024
Atera Apartments												(3)	Floating		84		29,500			3.88%	11/1/2024
Cedar Pointe												(6)	Floating		84		17,300			3.75%	9/1/2025
Crestmont Reserve												(3)	Floating		84		12,061			3.58%	10/1/2025
Brandywine I & II												(3)	Floating		84		43,835			3.58%	10/1/2025
Bella Vista												(7)	Floating		84		29,040			3.72%	2/1/2026
The Enclave												(7)	Floating		84		25,322			3.72%	2/1/2026
The Heritage												(7)	Floating		84		24,625			3.72%	2/1/2026
Summers Landing												(9)	Floating		84		10,109			3.58%	10/1/2025
					$	702,474										$	776,184
Fair market value adjustment						852		(9)									584		(8)
Deferred financing costs, net of accumulated amortization of $592						(8,358	)
Deferred financing costs, net of accumulated amortization of $2,026																	(6,795	)
					$	694,968										$	769,973

Held for Sale Properties
Timberglen	(3)	Floating		84		17,226				3.11%	7/1/2024
Held For Sale Property
Southpoint Reserve at Stoney Creek	(3)	Floating		84		13,600				3.34%	1/1/2022	(3)	Floating		84		13,281			4.51%	1/1/2022
Edgewater at Sandy Springs												(3)	Floating		84		52,000			4.08%	7/1/2024
Abbington Heights												(3)	Floating		84		16,920			3.65%	9/1/2025
Belmont at Duck Creek												(3)	Floating		84		17,760			3.79%	6/1/2025
The Ashlar												(3)	Floating		84		14,520			4.02%	7/1/2024
Heatherstone												(3)	Floating		84		8,880			4.02%	7/1/2024
The Pointe at the Foothills												(3)	Floating		84		34,800			4.02%	7/1/2024
					$	30,826										$	158,161
Deferred financing costs, net of accumulated amortization of $80						(499	)
Deferred financing costs, net of accumulated amortization of $616																	(1,525	)
					$	30,327										$	156,636

On June 30, 2017, the Company entered into 22 first mortgages, with a combined principal amount of $502.1 million, on certain of its properties, replacing the $168.4 million of existing mortgage debt outstanding on nine properties and the $300.0 million outstanding under a credit facility (the “$300 Million Credit Facility”). The refinancing of the existing mortgage debt incurred approximately $1.7 million of prepayment penalties, which is included in loss on extinguishment of debt and modification costs on the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income. The Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (“Freddie Mac”), who was the lender on the existing mortgage debt and the $300 Million Credit Facility, also originated the 22 new first mortgages (the “Freddie Refinance”). In accordance with FASB ASC 470-50, ~~Debt – Modifications and Extinguishments~~, the Company accounted for the refinancing as a modification of a debt instrument. As such, the existing $4.9 million of net deferred financing costs related to the prior mortgage debt and credit facility debt is included with the approximately $2.9 million of deferred financing costs incurred in connection with the modification. Such costs are recorded as a reduction from mortgages payable on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2017 and are amortized over the terms of the new mortgage debt. Additionally, the Company incurred approximately $2.0 million of costs in connection with the Freddie Refinance that were not capitalized as deferred financing costs. Such costs are recorded in loss on extinguishment of debt and modification costs on the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income. The Company used approximately $16.3 million of proceeds from the Freddie Refinance to fund a portion of the purchase of joint venture interests in the Portfolio held by noncontrolling interests (the “BH Buyout”) (see Note 10).

The following nine properties had existing mortgage debt that was refinanced: The Summit at Sabal Park, Courtney Cove, The Preserve at Terrell Mill, The Ashlar, Heatherstone, Versailles, Seasons 704 Apartments, Madera Point and The Pointe at the Foothills. The following twelve properties, which were refinanced as described above, were previously cross-collateralized as security for the $300 Million Credit Facility: Arbors on Forest Ridge, Cutter’s Point, Eagle Crest, Silverbrook, Timberglen, Edgewater at Sandy Springs, Beechwood Terrace, Willow Grove, Woodbridge, Venue at 8651, Old Farm and Stone Creek at Old Farm. The Colonnade, which obtained a first mortgage as described above, was not previously encumbered by mortgage debt or credit facility debt.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2017, the Company sold nine properties and repaid the related mortgage loans that encumbered eight of the properties, as detailed in the table below (in thousands):

The ninth property the Company sold, Toscana, was released from the collateral pool of the $300 Million Credit Facility upon its sale on April 3, 2017. The Company incurred prepayment penalties of approximately $0.9 million in connection with the payoff of these mortgage loans and $0.1 million of fees in connection with the release of Toscana, both of which are included in loss on extinguishment of debt and modification costs on the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income.

The weighted average interest rate of the Company’s mortgage indebtedness was ~~3.04%~~3.94% as of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 and ~~2.95%~~4.07% as of December 31, ~~2016.~~2018. The ~~increase~~decrease between the periods is primarily related to ~~increases~~a decrease in one-month LIBOR ~~partially offset by a weighted average reduction~~ of 57approximately 10 basis points ~~in the borrowing spread related~~ to ~~the Freddie Refinance.~~2.3980% as of June 30, 2019 from 2.5027% as of December 31, 2018. As of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2019, the adjusted weighted average interest rate of the Company’s mortgage indebtedness was ~~3.14%~~3.16%. For purposes of calculating the adjusted weighted average interest rate of the outstanding mortgage indebtedness, the Company has included the weighted average fixed rate of ~~1.3388%~~1.4272% for one-month LIBOR on its combined ~~$650.0~~$750.0 million notional amount of interest rate swap agreements, which effectively fix the interest rate on ~~$650.0~~$750.0 million of the Company’s floating rate mortgage indebtedness (see Note 7). The interest rate cap agreements the Company has entered into effectively cap one-month LIBOR on $293.2 million of the Company’s floating rate mortgage indebtedness at a weighted average rate of 4.20% (see Note 7).

Each of the Company’s mortgages is a non-recourse obligation subject to customary provisions. The loan agreements contain customary events of default, including defaults in the payment of principal or interest, defaults in compliance with the covenants contained in the documents evidencing the loan, defaults in payments under any other security instrument covering any part of the property, whether junior or senior to the loan, and bankruptcy or other insolvency events. As of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2019, the Company believes it is in compliance with all provisions.

Freddie Mac Multifamily Green Advantage. In order to obtain more favorable pricing on the Company’s mortgage debt financing with Freddie Mac, the Company has decided to participate in Freddie Mac’s new Multifamily Green Advantage ~~program. The~~program (the “Green Program”). In the second quarter of 2017, the Company ~~has~~ escrowed approximately $4.2 million to finance smarter, greener property improvements at 2018 of its ~~properties, which will be completed by~~properties. In connection with the ~~summer of 2019. The Company plans to reduce water/sewer costs at each property by at least 15% through the replacement of showerheads, plumbing fixtures~~three acquisitions and ~~toilets with modern energy efficient upgrades. By participating in this program,~~seven refinancings the Company ~~was able~~completed in 2018, the Company escrowed approximately $1.2 million related to ~~lower~~ the ~~interest rate on~~Green Program. In connection with the ~~properties it refinanced~~four purchases in 2019, the ~~Freddie Refinance by 10 basis points.~~Company escrowed approximately $0.6 million related to the Green Program.

The following table contains summary information concerning the Company’s credit ~~and bridge facilities~~facility as of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 (dollars in thousands):

~~$30 Million~~Corporate Credit Facility. On ~~December 29, 2016,~~January 28, 2019, the Company, through the OP, entered into a ~~$30.0~~$75.0 million credit facility (the ~~“$30 Million~~“Corporate Credit Facility”) with SunTrust Bank, as administrative agent and the lenders party thereto, and immediately drew ~~$15.0~~$52.5 million to fund a portion of the purchase price of ~~Old Farm~~Bella Vista, The Enclave, and Stone Creek at Old Farm. On February 1, 2017, the Company drew $14.0 million and used $12.0 million to fund a portion of the purchase price of Hollister Place and $2.0 million to fund value-add renovations at the Company’s properties. In April 2017, the Company used cash on hand plus its share of the proceeds, net of distributions to noncontrolling interests, from four properties it sold to pay down $10.0 million on the $30 MillionThe Heritage. The Corporate Credit Facility. On June 30, 2017, the Company drew $11.0 million to fund a portion of the BH Buyout. The $30 Million Credit Facility is a full-term, interest-only facility, has one 12-month extension option and is guaranteed by the OP.

~~2017 Bridge Facility~~. ~~On June 30, 2017~~, the Company, through the OP, entered into a $65.9 million bridge facility (the “2017 Bridge Facility”) with KeyBank. The Company drew $44.5 million to fund a portion of the purchase price of Rockledge Apartments and $21.4 million to fund a portion of the BH Buyout. In July 2017, the Company used proceeds from the sale of Regatta Bay to pay down $11.3 million on the 2017 Bridge Facility. The 2017 Bridge Facility is a full-term, interest-only facility with an initial ~~four-month~~24-month term, ~~(see below)~~has one 12-month extension option, and the Company has the right to request an increase in the facility amount up to $140 million (the “Accordion Feature”). The facility bears interest at a rate of one-month LIBOR plus a range from 2.00% to 2.50%, depending on the Company’s leverage level as determined under the credit facility agreement, and is guaranteed by the Company. ~~Interest accrues~~On June 29, 2019, the Company, through the OP, exercised its option under the Accordion Feature of the Corporate Credit Facility and increased the amount of the facility from $75 million to $125 million. In conjunction with the increase in the facility, the Company incurred costs of $0.5 million in obtaining the additional financing through the Accordion Feature (see “Deferred Financing Costs” below). The Company did not immediately draw additional funds on the 2017 Bridge Facility at an interest rate of one-month LIBOR plus 3.75%. In October 2017, the Company used proceeds from the sale of the NAVA Portfolio to pay down approximately $46.0 million on the 2017 Bridge Facility, bringingfacility and the outstanding balance to approximately $8.6 million, and also extended the maturity date to March 31, 2018 (see Note 13). The Company intends on paying the outstanding principal balance of the 2017 Bridge Facility with proceeds from the sales of properties classified as held for sale as of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017 or cash on hand.~~2019 was $52.5 million.

The ~~credit~~Corporate Credit Facility is a non-recourse obligation and ~~bridge facilities agreements contain~~contains customary ~~provisions with respect to~~ events of default, including defaults in the payment of principal or interest, defaults in compliance with the covenants contained in the document evidencing the loan, defaults in payments under any other security instrument, and ~~borrowing conditions. Certain prepayments may be required upon a breach of covenants~~bankruptcy or ~~borrowing conditions.~~other insolvency events. As of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2019, the Company believes it is in compliance with all ~~provisions of the agreements.~~provisions.

~~$300 Million Credit Facility~~. On June 6, 2016, the Company, through certain of its subsidiaries, entered into a $200.0 million credit facility, which was expanded to $300.0 million (the “$300 Million Credit Facility”) during the fourth quarter of 2016 to acquire three properties. The $300 Million Credit Facility was cross-collateralized by the following 12 properties: Arbors on Forest Ridge, Cutter’s Point, Eagle Crest, Silverbrook, Timberglen, Edgewater at Sandy Springs, Beechwood Terrace, Willow Grove, Woodbridge, Venue at 8651, Old Farm and Stone Creek at Old Farm.

On June 30, 2017, in connection with the Freddie Refinance, the Company repaid and retired the $300 Million Credit Facility. The refinancing of this existing credit facility debt did not incur prepayment penalties.

~~2016 Bridge Facility~~. On December 29, 2016, the Company, through the OP, entered into a $30.0 million bridge facility (the “2016 Bridge Facility”) with KeyBank and drew $30.0 million to fund a portion of the purchase price of Old Farm and Stone Creek at Old Farm. In April 2017, the Company paid down the entire $30.0 million of principal on the 2016 Bridge Facility, which was funded with its share of the proceeds, net of distributions to noncontrolling interests, from properties the Company sold in April 2017. The 2016 Bridge Facility was retired on April 28, 2017.

The Company defers costs incurred in obtaining financing and amortizes the costs over the terms of the related loans using the straight-line method, which approximates the effective interest method. Deferred financing costs, net of amortization, are recorded as a reduction from the related debt on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. Upon repayment of or in conjunction with a material change in the terms of the underlying debt agreement (i.e. a 10% or greater difference in the cash flows between instruments), any unamortized costs and fair market value adjustments related to the original debt are charged to loss on extinguishment of debt and modification ~~costs (see “Loss on Extinguishment of Debt and Modification Costs” below).~~costs. For the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 and ~~2016,~~2018, the Company wrote-off deferred financing costs of ~~$0.6~~approximately $0.0 million and ~~$0.4~~$0.1 million, respectively, which is included in loss on extinguishment of debt and modification costs on the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive ~~income.~~income (loss). For the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 and ~~2016,~~2018, the Company wrote-off deferred financing costs of ~~$1.0~~approximately $0.0 million and ~~$0.7~~$0.5 million, respectively, which is included in loss on extinguishment of debt and modification costs on the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive ~~income. Amortization~~income (loss). For the three months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, amortization of deferred financing costs of ~~$0.6~~approximately $0.5 million and $0.4 million, respectively, is included in interest expense on the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income ~~for~~(loss). For the ~~three~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 and ~~2016, respectively. Amortization~~2018, amortization of deferred financing costs of ~~$1.5~~approximately $0.9 million and ~~$1.1~~$0.7 million, respectively, is included in interest expense on the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income ~~for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.~~(loss).

Upon repayment of or in conjunction with a material change (i.e. a 10% or greater difference in the cash flows between instruments) in the terms of an underlying debt agreement, the Company writes off any unamortized deferred financing costs related to the original debt. Loss on extinguishment of debt and modification costs ~~also~~ includes prepayment penalties and defeasance costs incurred on the early repayment of debt, ~~and~~ costs incurred in a debt modification that are not capitalized as deferred financing ~~costs.~~costs and other costs incurred in a debt extinguishment.

The aggregate scheduled maturities, including amortizing principal payments, of total debt for the next five calendar years subsequent to ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 are as follows (in thousands):

	Operating Properties & Other Secured Debt		Held For Sale Properties		Total		Operating Properties		Held For Sale Property		Credit Facility		Total
2017	$	54,993	$	—	$	54,993
2018		43,352		276		43,628
2019		2,448		309		2,757	$	360	$	116		—	$	476
2020		2,483		316		2,799		744		263		—		1,007
2021		2,531		326		2,857		782		282		52,500		53,564
2022								817		12,620		—		13,437
2023								20,598		—		—		20,598
Thereafter		681,264		29,599		710,863		752,883		144,880		—		897,763
Total	$	787,071	$	30,826	$	817,897	$	776,184	$	158,161	$	52,500	$	986,845

Fair value measurements are determined based on the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. As a basis for considering market participant assumptions in fair value measurements, ~~FASB~~ ASC 820~~Fair Value Measurement and Disclosures~~, establishes a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between market participant assumptions based on market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity (observable inputs that are classified within Levels 1 and 2 of the hierarchy) and the reporting entity’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions (unobservable inputs classified within Level 3 of the hierarchy):

The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment and considers factors specific to the asset or liability. The Company utilizes independent third parties to perform the allocation of value analysis for each property acquisition and to perform the market valuations on its derivative financial instruments and has established policies, as described above, processes and procedures intended to ensure that the valuation methodologies for investments and derivative financial instruments are fair and consistent as of the measurement date.

The Company is exposed to certain risks arising from both its business operations and economic conditions. The Company principally manages its exposures to a wide variety of business and operational risks through management of its core business activities. The Company manages economic risks, including interest rate, liquidity, and credit risk primarily by managing the amount, sources, and duration of its debt funding and the use of derivative financial instruments. Specifically, the Company may enter into derivative financial instruments to manage exposures that arise from business activities that result in the receipt or payment of future known and uncertain cash amounts, the value of which are determined by interest rates. The Company’s derivative financial instruments are used to manage differences in the amount, timing, and duration of the Company’s known or expected cash payments principally related to the Company’s borrowings. In order to minimize counterparty credit risk, the Company enters into and expects to enter into hedging arrangements only with major financial institutions that have high credit ratings.

The Company utilizes an independent third party to perform the market valuations on its derivative financial instruments. The valuation of these instruments is determined using widely accepted valuation techniques, including discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of each derivative. This analysis reflects the contractual terms of the derivatives, including the period to maturity, and uses observable market-based inputs, including interest rate curves and implied volatilities. The fair values of interest rate swaps are determined using the market standard methodology of netting the discounted future fixed cash receipts (or payments) and the discounted expected variable cash payments (or receipts). The variable cash payments (or receipts) are based on an

expectation of future interest rates (forward curves) derived from observable market interest rate curves. The fair values of interest rate caps are determined using the market standard methodology of discounting the future expected cash receipts that would occur if

variable interest rates rise above the strike rate of the caps. The variable interest rates used in the calculation of projected receipts on the cap are based on an expectation of future interest rates derived from observable market interest rate curves and volatilities. To comply with the provisions of ASC 820, the Company incorporates credit valuation adjustments to appropriately reflect both the Company’s own nonperformance risk and the respective counterparty’s nonperformance risk in the fair value measurements. In adjusting the fair value of the Company’s derivative contracts for the effect of nonperformance risk, the Company has considered the impact of netting and any applicable credit enhancements, such as collateral postings, thresholds, mutual puts and guarantees. Although the Company has determined that the majority of the inputs used to value its derivatives fall within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the credit valuation adjustments associated with the Company’s derivatives utilize Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads, to evaluate the likelihood of default by the Company and its counterparties. The Company has determined that the significance of the impact of the credit valuation adjustments made to its derivative contracts, which determination was based on the fair value of each individual contract, was not significant to the overall valuation. As a result, all of the Company’s derivatives held as of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 and December 31, ~~2016~~2018 were classified as Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

The Company’s main objective in using interest rate derivatives is to add stability to interest expense related to floating rate debt. To accomplish this objective, the Company primarily uses interest rate swaps and caps as part of its interest rate risk management strategy. Interest rate swaps involve the receipt of variable-rate amounts from a counterparty in exchange for the Company making fixed-rate payments over the life of the agreements without exchange of the underlying notional amount. The interest rate swaps have terms ranging from four to five years. Interest rate caps involve the receipt of variable-rate amounts from a counterparty if interest rates rise above the strike rate on the contract in exchange for an up-front premium. The interest rate caps have terms ranging from three to four years. During the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 and ~~2016, such~~2018, interest rate cap derivatives were used to hedge the variable cash flows associated with a ~~majority~~portion of the Company’s floating rate debt. The interest rate cap agreements the Company has entered into effectively cap one-month LIBOR on ~~$293.2~~$320.1 million of the Company’s floating rate mortgage indebtedness at a weighted average rate of ~~4.20%~~5.82%.

The ~~effective portion of~~ changes in the fair value of derivative financial instruments that are designated as cash flow hedges isare recorded in ~~other comprehensive income (loss) (“OCI”)~~OCI and isare subsequently reclassified into net income (loss) in the period that the hedged forecasted transaction affects earnings. Amounts reported in OCI related to derivatives will be reclassified to interest expense as interest payments are made on the Company’s floating rate debt. ~~The~~Prior to the Company’s adoption of ASU 2017-12 on January 1, 2018, the ineffective portion of changes in the ~~change in~~ fair value of the Company’s derivatives isdesignated as cash flow hedges was recognized directly in net income (loss) as interest expense. ~~During~~The adoption of ASU 2017-12 eliminates the ~~three~~separate measurement of effectiveness and ineffectiveness, and all changes in the fair value of derivatives that are designated as cash flow hedges are recorded directly in OCI. Therefore, during the six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017 and 2016,~~2019, the Company recorded ~~less than $0.1 million~~no gain or loss related to the ineffective portion of changes in the fair value of its derivatives designated as cash flow hedges. During the six months ended June 30, 2019 and ~~$0.6 million, respectively, of gain~~2018, the Company recorded no gain/(loss) related to the ineffective portion of changes in the fair value of its derivatives designated as cash flow hedges, which is recorded as a ~~reduction~~decrease/(increase) to interest expense on the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income. During the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company recorded approximately $0.1 million and $0.6 million, respectively, of gain related to the ineffective portion of changes in the fair value of its derivatives designated as cash flow hedges. As of September 30, 2016, the Company had four interest rate swap derivatives, with a notional amount of $400.0 million, designated as cash flow hedges.income (loss).

In order to fix a portion of, and mitigate the risk associated with, the Company’s floating rate indebtedness (without incurring substantial prepayment penalties or defeasance costs typically associated with fixed rate indebtedness when repaid early or refinanced), the Company, through the OP, has entered into ~~seven~~nine interest rate swap transactions with KeyBank ~~(the “Counterparty”~~National Association (“KeyBank”) and SunTrust Bank with a combined notional amount of ~~$650.0~~$750.0 million. The interest rate swaps the Company has entered into effectively replace the floating interest rate (one-month LIBOR) with respect to that amount with a weighted average fixed rate of ~~1.3388%~~1.4272%. The Company has designated these interest rate swaps as cash flow hedges of interest rate risk.

As of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2019, the Company had the following outstanding interest rate swaps that were designated as cash flow hedges of interest rate risk (dollars in thousands):

Effective Date	Termination Date	Notional		Fixed Rate				Floating Rate Option (1)	Termination Date	Counterparty	Notional		Fixed Rate (1)
July 1, 2016	June 1, 2021	$	100,000		1.1055	%		One-month LIBOR	June 1, 2021	KeyBank	$	100,000		1.1055	%
July 1, 2016	June 1, 2021		100,000		1.0210	%		One-month LIBOR	June 1, 2021	KeyBank		100,000		1.0210	%
July 1, 2016	June 1, 2021		100,000		0.9000	%		One-month LIBOR	June 1, 2021	KeyBank		100,000		0.9000	%
September 1, 2016	June 1, 2021		100,000		0.9560	%		One-month LIBOR	June 1, 2021	KeyBank		100,000		0.9560	%
April 1, 2017	April 1, 2022		100,000		1.9570	%		One-month LIBOR	April 1, 2022	KeyBank		100,000		1.9570	%
May 1, 2017	April 1, 2022		50,000		1.9610	%		One-month LIBOR	April 1, 2022	KeyBank		50,000		1.9610	%
July 1, 2017	July 1, 2022		100,000		1.7820	%		One-month LIBOR	July 1, 2022	KeyBank		100,000		1.7820	%
June 1, 2019									June 1, 2024	KeyBank		50,000		2.0020	%
June 1, 2019									June 1, 2024	SunTrust		50,000		2.0020	%
		$	650,000		1.3388	%	(2)				$	750,000		1.4272	%	(2)

Derivatives not designated as hedges are not speculative and are used to manage the Company’s exposure to interest rate movements but either do not meet the strict requirements to apply hedge accounting in accordance with FASB ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging, or the Company has elected not to designate such ~~derivatives.~~derivatives as hedges. Changes in the fair value of derivatives not designated in hedging relationships are recorded directly in net income (loss) as interest expense. ~~As of September 30, 2016, the Company had 36 interest rate cap derivatives, with a notional amount of $578.3 million, which were not designated as hedges in qualifying hedging relationships.~~

As of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2019, the Company had the following outstanding derivatives that were not designated as hedges in qualifying hedging relationships (dollars in thousands):

Product

Number of Instruments

Notional

Number of

Instruments

Notional

Interest rate caps

293,184

320,137

As of June 30, 2018, the Company had 11 interest rate cap derivatives, with a notional amount of $182.4 million, which were not designated as hedges in qualifying hedging relationships.

The table below presents the fair value of the Company’s derivative financial instruments as well as their classification on the consolidated balance sheets as of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 and December 31, ~~2016~~2018 (in thousands):

		Asset Derivatives				Liability Derivatives						Asset Derivatives				Liability Derivatives
	Balance Sheet Location	September 30, 2017		December 31, 2016		September 30, 2017			December 31, 2016		Balance Sheet Location	June 30, 2019		December 31, 2018		June 30, 2019		December 31, 2018
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
Interest rate swaps	Fair market value of interest rate swaps	$	11,759	$	12,413	$	713	(1)	$	—	Fair market value of interest rate swaps	$	5,125	$	18,141	$	3,615	$	—

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
Interest rate caps	Prepaid and other assets		—		5		—			—	Prepaid and other assets		3		10		—		—
Total		$	11,759	$	12,418	$	713		$	—		$	5,128	$	18,151	$	3,615	$	—

The tables below present the effect of the Company’s derivative financial instruments on the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss) for the three and ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 and ~~2016~~2018 (in thousands):

	Amount of gain (loss) recognized in OCI on derivative (effective portion)						Location of gain (loss) reclassified from accumulated OCI into income	Amount of gain (loss) reclassified from accumulated OCI into income (effective portion)						Location of gain (loss) recognized in income on derivative	Amount of gain (loss) recognized in income on derivative (ineffective portion)*						Amount of gain (loss) recognized in OCI						Location of gain (loss) reclassified from accumulated	Amount of gain (loss) reclassified from OCI into income					Location of gain (loss) recognized	Amount of gain (loss) recognized in income
	2017			2016			(effective portion)	2017			2016			(ineffective portion)*	2017				2016		2019			2018			OCI into income	2019		2018			in income	2019		2018
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
For the three months ended September 30,
For the three months ended June 30,
Interest rate products		(241	)		(1,576	)	Interest expense		(360	)		(479	)	Interest expense		(63	)	(1)		599	$	(9,064	)	$	3,653	(1)	Interest expense	$	1,882	$	904	(1)	Interest expense	$	—	$	—
For the nine months ended September 30,
For the six months ended June 30,
Interest rate products		(2,162	)		(1,619	)	Interest expense		(1,142	)		(491	)	Interest expense		(88	)	(2)		599	$	(12,849	)	$	11,753	(1)	Interest expense	$	3,762	$	1,243	(1)	Interest expense	$	—	$	—	(2)

Redeemable noncontrolling interests in the OP have a redemption feature and are marked to their redemption value if such value exceeds the carrying value of the redeemable noncontrolling interests in the OP (see Note 10). The redemption value is based on the fair value of the Company’s common stock at the redemption date, and therefore, is calculated based on the fair value of the Company’s common stock at the balance sheet date. Since the valuation is based on observable inputs such as quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, redeemable noncontrolling interests in the OP are classified as Level 2 if they are adjusted to their redemption value.

At ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 and December 31, ~~2016,~~2018, the fair values of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivable, prepaid and other assets, accounts payable and other accrued liabilities, accrued real estate taxes payable, accrued interest payable, security deposits and prepaid rent approximated their carrying values because of the short term nature of these instruments. The estimated fair values of other financial instruments were determined by the Company using available market information and appropriate valuation methodologies. Considerable judgment is necessary to interpret market data and develop estimated fair values. Accordingly, the estimates presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts the Company would realize on the disposition of the financial instruments. The use of different market assumptions or estimation methodologies may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts.

Long-term indebtedness is carried at amounts that reasonably approximate their fair value. In calculating the fair value of its long-term indebtedness, the Company used interest rate and spread assumptions that reflect current credit worthiness and market conditions available for the issuance of long-term debt with similar terms and remaining maturities. These financial instruments utilize Level 2 inputs.

Real estate assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. In such cases, the Company will evaluate the recoverability of such real estate assets based on estimated future cash flows and the estimated liquidation value of such real estate assets, and provide for impairment if such undiscounted cash flows are insufficient to recover the carrying amount of the real estate asset. If impaired, the real estate asset will be written down to its estimated fair value. There can be no assurance that the estimates discussed herein, using Level 3 inputs, are indicative of the amounts the Company could realize on disposition of the real estate asset. For the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 and ~~2016,~~2018, the Company did not record any impairment charges related to real estate assets.

~~The Company began operations on March 31, 2015 as a result of the Spin-Off.~~ During the ~~three and nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2019, the Company issued ~~110,257~~143,642 shares of common stock pursuant to its long-term incentive plan (see “Long Term Incentive Plan” below) and ~~retired 308,313~~252,165 pursuant to its at-the-market offering (see “-At-the-Market Offering” below).

As of June 30, 2019, the Company had 23,895,442 shares of common stock, ~~it had repurchased pursuant to its share repurchase program (see “Share Repurchase Program” and “Long Term Incentive Plan” below). As of~~ ~~September~~ ~~30, 2017, the Company had 21,095,769 shares of common stock, $0.01~~ par value $0.01 per share, issued and outstanding.

On June 15, 2016, the Board authorized the ~~repurchase by the~~ Company ofto repurchase up to $30.0 million of its common stock, ~~$0.01~~ par value $0.01 per ~~share. This authorization expires~~share, during a two-year period that was set to expire on June 15, ~~2018.~~2018 (the “Share Repurchase Program”). On April 30, 2018, the Board increased the Share Repurchase Program to up to $40.0 million and extended it by an additional two years to June 15, 2020. The Company may utilize various methods to effect the repurchases, and the timing and extent of the repurchases will depend upon several factors, including market and business conditions, regulatory requirements and other corporate considerations, including whether the Company’s common stock is trading at a significant discount to net asset value per share. Repurchases under this program may be discontinued at any time. During the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2019, the Company did not repurchase any shares of its common stock. As of June 30, 2019, the Company had repurchased ~~58,157~~737,458 shares of its common stock, ~~$0.01~~ par value ~~per share, at a total cost of~~

~~approximately $1,354,000, or $23.27 per share. As of September 30, 2017, the Company has repurchased 308,313 shares of its common stock,~~ $0.01 ~~par value~~ per share, at a total cost of approximately ~~$5,941,000,~~$16,694,000, or ~~$19.27~~$22.64 per share.

From time to time, in accordance with the Company’s share repurchase program, the Company may repurchase shares of its common stock in the open market. Until any such shares are retired, the cost of the shares is included in common stock held in treasury at cost on the consolidated balance sheet. The number of shares of common stock classified as treasury shares reduces the number of shares of the Company’s common stock outstanding and, accordingly, are considered in the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period. During the nine months ended September 30, 2017, the Company retired 308,313 shares of its common stock held in treasury. As of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Company had 0 shares and 250,156 shares, respectively, of common stock held in treasury.

On June 15, 2016, the Company’s stockholders approved a long-term incentive plan (the “2016 LTIP”) and the Company filed a registration statement on Form S-8 registering 2,100,000 shares of common stock, ~~$0.01~~ par value $0.01 per share, ~~that~~which the Company may issue pursuant to the 2016 LTIP. The 2016 LTIP authorizes the compensation committee of the Board to provide equity-based compensation in the form of stock options, appreciation rights, restricted shares, restricted stock units, performance shares, performance units and certain other awards denominated or payable in, or otherwise based on, the Company’s common stock or factors that may influence the value of the Company’s common stock, plus cash incentive awards, for the purpose of providing the Company’s directors, officers and other key employees (and those of the Adviser and the Company’s subsidiaries), the Company’s non-employee directors, and potentially certain non-employees who perform employee-type functions, incentives and rewards for performance.

Restricted Stock Units. Under the 2016 LTIP, restricted stock units may be granted to the Company’s directors, officers and other key employees (andthose of the Adviser and the Company’s subsidiaries) and typically vest over a three to ~~four year~~five-year period for officers, employees and certain key employees of the Adviser and annually for directors. Beginning on the date of grant, restricted stock units earn dividends that are payable in cash on the vesting date. On August 11, 2016, pursuant to the 2016 LTIP, the Company granted 209,797 restricted stock units to its directors and officers. On March 16, 2017, pursuant to the 2016 LTIP, the Company granted 219,802 restricted stock units to its directors and officers. On February 15, 2018, pursuant to the 2016 LTIP, the Company granted 275,795 restricted stock units to its directors, officers, employees and certain key employees of the Adviser. On February 21, 2019, pursuant to the 2016 LTIP, the Company granted 186,662 restricted stock units to its directors, officers, employees and certain key employees of the Adviser. The following table includes the number of restricted stock units granted, vested, forfeited and outstanding as of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017:~~2019:

	2017						2019
	Number of Units				Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value		Number of Units				Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
Outstanding January 1,		209,797			$	19.20		464,626
Granted		219,802				22.57		186,662				37.50
Vested		(110,257	)			19.20		(148,091	)	(1)		23.10
Forfeited		—				—		(6,386	)			—
Outstanding September 30,		319,342		(1)	$	21.52
Outstanding June 30,								496,811		(2)	$	28.14

As of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2019, the Company ~~has~~had issued ~~110,257~~384,410 shares of common stock under the 2016 LTIP. For the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 and ~~2016,~~2018, the Company recognized approximately ~~$0.8~~$1.4 million and ~~$0.3~~$1.1 million, respectively, of equity-based compensation expense related to grants of restricted stock units, which is included in corporate general and administrative expenses on the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive ~~income.~~income (loss). For the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 and ~~2016,~~2018, the Company recognized approximately ~~$2.4~~$2.7 million and ~~$0.3~~$2.0 million, respectively, of equity-based compensation expense related to grants of restricted stock units. As of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2019, the Company ~~has~~had recognized a liability of approximately ~~$0.3~~$0.7 million related to dividends earned on restricted stock units that are payable in cash upon vesting.

On February 20, 2019, the Company, the OP and the Adviser entered into separate equity distribution agreements with each of Jefferies LLC (“Jefferies”), Raymond James & Associates, Inc. (“Raymond James”) and SunTrust Robinson Humphrey, Inc. (together with Raymond James and Jefferies, the “Sales Agents”), pursuant to which the Company may issue and sell from time to time shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.01 per share, having an aggregate sales price of up to $100,000,000. Sales of shares of common stock, if any, may be made in transactions that are deemed to be “at the market” offerings, as defined in Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), including, without limitation, sales made by means of ordinary brokers’ transactions on the New York Stock Exchange, to or through a market maker at market prices prevailing at the time of sale, at prices related to prevailing market prices or at negotiated prices based on prevailing market prices (the “ATM Program”). In addition to the issuance and sale of shares of common stock, the Company may enter into forward sale agreements with each of Jefferies and Raymond James, or their respective affiliates, through the ATM Program. During the three months ended June 30, 2019, the Company issued 252,165 shares of common stock at an average price of $40.26 per share for net proceeds of approximately $9.4 million. The Company paid approximately $0.2 million in fees to the Sales Agents with respect to such sales and incurred other issuance costs of approximately $0.5 million, both of which were netted against the gross proceeds and recorded in additional paid in capital. The ATM Program may be terminated by the Company at any time and expires automatically once aggregate sales under the ATM Program reach $100,000,000.

Basic earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of shares of the Company’s common stock outstanding, which is adjusted for shares classified as treasury shares during the period and excludes any unvested restricted stock units issued pursuant to the 2016 LTIP. Diluted earnings (loss) per share is computed by adjusting basic earnings (loss) per share for the dilutive effect of the assumed vesting of restricted stock units. During

periods of net loss, the assumed vesting of restricted stock units is anti-dilutive and is not included in the calculation of earnings (loss) per share.

The effect of the conversion of OP Units held by noncontrolling limited partners is not reflected in the computation of basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share, as they are exchangeable for common stock on a one-for-one basis. The income (loss) allocable to such units is allocated on this same basis and reflected as net income (loss) attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interests in the ~~Operating Partnership~~OP in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income. As such, the assumed conversion of these units would have no net impact on the determination of diluted earnings (loss) per share. See Note 10 for additional information.

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share for the periods presented (in thousands, except per share amounts):

For the Three Months Ended September 30,

For the Nine Months Ended September 30,

2017

2016

2017

2016

Numerator for earnings per share:

Net income

$
54,076

$
8,825

$
60,702

$
25,712

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

—

1,735

2,836

4,047

Net income attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interests in the Operating Partnership

162

—

162

—

Net income attributable to common stockholders

$
53,914

$
7,090

$
57,704

$
21,665

Denominator for earnings per share:

Weighted average common shares outstanding

21,085

21,260

21,057

21,282

Denominator for basic earnings per share

21,085

21,260

21,057

21,282

Unvested restricted stock units

368

116

350

40

Denominator for diluted earnings per share

21,453

21,376

21,407

21,322

Earnings per weighted average common share:

Basic

$
2.56

$
0.33

$
2.74

$
1.02

Diluted

$
2.51

$
0.33

$
2.70

$
1.02

	For the Three Months Ended June 30,						For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2019			2018			2019			2018
Numerator for earnings (loss) per share:
Net income (loss)	$	(1,987	)	$	(1,666	)	$	(6,360	)	$	8,428
Net income (loss) attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interests in the Operating Partnership		(6	)		(5	)		(19	)		25
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders	$	(1,981	)	$	(1,661	)	$	(6,341	)	$	8,403

Denominator for earnings (loss) per share:
Weighted average common shares outstanding		23,736			20,780			23,643			20,883
Denominator for basic earnings (loss) per share		23,736			20,780			23,643			20,883
Weighted average unvested restricted stock units		497			515			496			479
Denominator for diluted earnings per share		24,233			21,295			24,139			21,362

Earnings (loss) per weighted average common share:
Basic	$	(0.08	)	$	(0.08	)	$	(0.27	)	$	0.40
Diluted	$	(0.08	)	$	(0.08	)	$	(0.27	)	$	0.39

Interests in the OP held by limited partners are represented by OP Units. Net income (loss) is allocated to holders of OP Units based upon net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders and the weighted average number of OP Units outstanding to total common shares plus OP Units outstanding during the period. Capital contributions, distributions, and profits and losses are allocated to OP Units in accordance with the terms of the partnership agreement of the OP. Each time the OP distributes cash to the Company, outside limited partners of the OP receive their pro-rata share of the distribution. Redeemable noncontrolling interests in the OP have a redemption feature and are marked to their redemption value if such value exceeds the carrying value of the redeemable noncontrolling interests in the OP.

On June 30, 2017, the Company and the OP entered into a contribution agreement (the “Contribution Agreement”) with BH Equities, LLC and its affiliates (collectively, “BH Equity”), whereby the Company purchased 100% of the joint venture interests in the Portfolio owned by BH Equity, representing approximately 8.4% ownership in the Portfolio (the “BH Buyout”), for total consideration of approximately $51.7 million (the “Purchase Amount”). The Purchase Amount consisted of approximately $49.7 million in cash that was paid on June 30, 2017 and 73,233 OP Units (initially valued at $2.0 million) that were issued on August 1, 2017. The number of OP Units issued was calculated by dividing $2.0 million by the midpoint of the range of the Company’s net asset value as publicly disclosed in connection with the Company’s release of its second quarter of 2017 earnings results, which was $27.31 per share. The Company financed the cash portion of the Purchase Amount with $21.4 million of proceeds from the 2017 Bridge Facility, $16.3 million of proceeds from the Freddie Refinance, $11.0 million of proceeds from the $30 Million Credit Facility and $1.0 million of cash on hand.

In connection with the issuance of OP Units to BH Equity on August 1, 2017, the Company and the OP amended the partnership agreement of the OP (the “Amendment”). Pursuant to the Amendment, limited partners holding OP Units have the right to cause the OP to redeem their units at a redemption price equal to and in the form of the Cash Amount (as defined in the partnership agreement

of the OP), provided that such OP Units have been outstanding for at least one year. The Company, through the OP GP, as the general partner of the OP may, in its sole discretion, purchase the OP Units by paying to the limited partner either the Cash Amount or the REIT Share Amount (one share of common stock of the Company for each OP Unit), as defined in the partnership agreement of the OP. Notwithstanding the foregoing, a limited partner will not be entitled to exercise its redemption right to the extent the issuance of the Company’s common stock to the redeeming limited partner would (1) be prohibited, as determined in the Company’s sole discretion, under the Company’s charter or (2) cause the acquisition of common stock by such redeeming limited partner to be ~~"integrated"~~“integrated” with any other distribution of the Company’s common stock for purposes of complying with the Securities ~~Act of 1933, as amended.~~Act. Accordingly, the Company records the OP Units held by noncontrolling limited partners outside of permanent equity and reports the OP Units at the greater of their carrying value or their redemption value using the Company’s stock price at each balance sheet date.

The following table sets forth the redeemable noncontrolling interests in the OP for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 (in thousands):

Noncontrolling interests have in the past and may in the future be comprised of joint venture partners’ interests in joint ventures the Company consolidates. When applicable, the Company reports its joint venture partners’ interests in its consolidated joint ventures and other subsidiary interests held by third parties as noncontrolling interests. The Company records these noncontrolling interests at their initial fair value, adjusting the basis prospectively for their share of the respective consolidated investment’s net income or loss, equity contributions, return of capital, and distributions. Generally, these noncontrolling interests are not redeemable by the equity holders and are presented as part of permanent equity. Income and losses are allocated to the noncontrolling interest holder based on its economic ownership percentage.

~~During the period ended June 30, 2017, prior to the BH Buyout, the Company purchased 100% of the noncontrolling interests in three of its joint ventures for approximately $2.0 million.~~ On June 30, 2017, in connection with the BH Buyout, the Company purchased 100% of the outstanding noncontrolling interests in its remaining joint ventures for approximately $51.7 million. On June 30, 2017, prior to the BH Buyout, the carrying value of such noncontrolling interests was approximately $20.5 million. On June 30, 2017, the Company eliminated the carrying value of such noncontrolling interests on its consolidated balance sheet. The remaining $31.2 million of the Purchase Amount resulted in a reduction to additional paid-in capital on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet.

In connection with the Contribution Agreement, the Company fully indemnified BH Equity on all non-recourse carve out guarantees it had previously provided for mortgage indebtedness secured by certain properties in the Portfolio. In consideration of the guarantees previously provided by BH Equity, it was entitled to an additional profit interest in each entity (the “Total Promote”) such that distributions were to be made to the members of the entity pro rata in proportion to their relative percentage interests until the members received an internal rate of return equal to 13%. Then, the proportion of distributions changed to a predetermined allocation according to the agreements between each entity and BH Equity. The Total Promote due by the Company to BH Equity was relinquished in connection with the BH Buyout.

The Company has entered into management agreements with BH Management Services, LLC (“BH”), the Company’s property manager and an independently owned third party, who manages the Company’s properties and supervises the implementation of the Company’s value-add program. BH is an affiliate of BH Equity, who was a noncontrolling interest member of the Company’s joint ventures prior to the BH Buyout on June 30, 2017. Through BH Equity’s noncontrolling interests in such joint ventures, BH Equity was deemed to be a related party. With the completion of the BH Buyout, BH Equity is no longer deemed to be a related party. BH Equity became a noncontrolling limited partner of the OP upon execution of the Amendment. BH and its affiliates do not have common ownership in any joint venture with the ~~Company’s~~ Adviser; there is also no common ownership between BH and its affiliates and the ~~Company’s~~ Adviser.

The property management fee paid to BH is approximately 3% of the monthly gross income from each property managed. Currently, BH manages all of the Company’s properties. Additionally, the Company may pay BH certain other fees, including: (1) a fee of ~~$15.00~~$15-25 per unit for the one-time setup and inspection of properties, (2) a construction supervision fee of 5-6% of total project costs, which is capitalized, (3) acquisition fees and due diligence costs reimbursements, and (4) other owner approved fees at $55 per hour. BH also acts as a paymaster for the properties and is reimbursed at cost for various operating expenses it pays on behalf of the properties. The following is a summary of fees that the properties incurred to BH and its affiliates, as well as reimbursements paid to BH from the properties for various operating expenses, for the three and ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 and ~~2016~~2018 (in thousands):

		For the Three Months Ended September 30,				For the Nine Months Ended September 30,					For the Three Months Ended June 30,				For the Six Months Ended June 30,
		2017		2016		2017		2016			2019		2018		2019		2018
Fees incurred
Property management fees	(1)	$	1,110	$	989	$	3,280	$	3,007	(1)	$	1,285	$	1,066	$	2,525	$	2,120
Construction supervision fees	(2)		213		247		651		624	(2)		340		283		564		570
Design Fees												60		—		60		—
Acquisition fees	(3)		—		139		505		139	(3)		—		—		308		—

Reimbursements
Payroll and benefits	(4)		4,131		4,140		11,855		12,212	(4)		4,000		3,347		8,311		7,135
Other reimbursements	(5)		432		460		1,457		1,465	(5)		928		563		1,561		1,024

Until the BH Buyout on June 30, 2017, in accordance with the operating agreement of each entity that owns the properties, the Company earned an asset management fee for services provided in connection with monitoring the operations of the properties. The asset management fee was equal to 0.5% per annum of the aggregate effective gross income of the properties, as defined in each of the operating agreements. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, the properties incurred asset management fees to the Company of approximately $0.2 million and $0.4 million, respectively. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, the properties incurred asset management fees to the Company of approximately $0.2 million and $0.5 million, respectively. Since the fees were paid to the Company (and not the Adviser) by consolidated properties, they have been eliminated in consolidation. However, because the Company’s previous joint venture partners owned a portion of each of a majority of the properties in the Portfolio, prior to the Company’s purchase of 100% of their joint venture interests, they absorbed their pro rata share of the asset management fee. This amount is reflected on the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income in the net income attributable to noncontrolling interests. 11. Related Party Transactions

In accordance with the Advisory Agreement, the Company pays the Adviser an advisory fee equal to 1.00% of the Average Real Estate Assets (as defined below). The duties performed by the Company’s Adviser under the terms of the Advisory Agreement

include, but are not limited to: providing daily management for the Company, selecting and working with third party service providers, managing the Company’s properties or overseeing the third party property manager, formulating an investment strategy for the Company and selecting suitable properties and investments, managing the Company’s outstanding debt and its interest rate exposure through derivative instruments, determining when to sell assets, and managing the value-add program or overseeing a third party vendor that implements the value-add program. “Average Real Estate Assets” means the average of the aggregate book value of Real Estate Assets before reserves for depreciation or other non-cash reserves, computed by taking the average of the book value of real estate assets at the end of each month (1) for which any fee under the Advisory Agreement is calculated or (2) during the year for which any expense reimbursement under the Advisory Agreement is calculated. “Real Estate Assets” is defined broadly in the Advisory Agreement to include, among other things, investments in real estate-related securities and mortgages and reserves for capital expenditures (the value-add program). The advisory fee is payable monthly in arrears in cash, unless the Adviser elects, in its sole discretion, to receive all or a portion of the advisory fee in shares of common stock, subject to certain limitations.

In accordance with the Advisory Agreement, the Company also pays the Adviser an administrative fee equal to 0.20% of the Average Real Estate Assets. The administrative fee is payable monthly in arrears in cash, unless the Adviser elects, in its sole discretion, to receive all or a portion of the administrative fee in shares of common stock, subject to certain limitations.

The advisory and administrative fees paid to the Adviser on the Contributed Assets (as defined ~~below)~~in the Advisory Agreement) are subject to an annual cap of approximately $5.4 million (the “Contributed Assets Cap”) (see “Expense Cap” below).

Pursuant to the terms of the Advisory Agreement, the Company will reimburse the Adviser for all documented Operating Expenses and Offering Expenses it incurs on behalf of the Company. “Operating Expenses” include legal, accounting, financial and due diligence services performed by the Adviser that outside professionals or outside consultants would otherwise perform, the Company’s pro rata share of rent, telephone, utilities, office furniture, equipment, machinery and other office, internal and overhead expenses of the Adviser required for the Company’s operations, and compensation expenses under the 2016 LTIP. Operating Expenses do not include expenses for the advisory and administrative services described in the Advisory Agreement. Certain Operating Expenses, such as the Company’s ratable share of rent, telephone, utilities, office furniture, equipment, machinery and other office, internal and overhead expenses incurred by the Adviser or its affiliates that relate to the operations of the Company, may be billed monthly to the Company under a shared services agreement. “Offering Expenses” include all expenses (other than underwriters’ discounts) in connection with an offering, including, without limitation, legal, accounting, printing, mailing and filing fees and other documented offering expenses. For the ~~three and nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 and ~~2016,~~2018, the Adviser did not bill any Operating Expenses or Offering Expenses to the Company and any such expenses the Adviser incurred during the periods are considered to be permanently waived.

Pursuant to the terms of the Advisory Agreement, expenses paid or incurred by the Company for advisory and administrative fees payable to the Adviser and Operating Expenses will not exceed 1.5% of Average Real Estate Assets per calendar year (or part thereof that the Advisory Agreement is in effect (the “Expense Cap”)). The Expense Cap does not limit the reimbursement of expenses related to Offering Expenses. The Expense Cap also does not apply to legal, accounting, financial, due diligence and other service fees incurred in connection with mergers and acquisitions, extraordinary litigation or other events outside the Company’s ordinary course of business or any out-of-pocket acquisitions or due diligence expenses incurred in connection with the acquisition or disposition of real estate assets. Also, advisory and administrative fees are further limited on Contributed Assets to approximately $5.4 million in any calendar year. Contributed Assets refers to all Real Estate Assets contributed to the Company as part of the Spin-Off. The Contributed Assets Cap is not reduced for dispositions of such assets subsequent to the Spin-Off. Advisory and administrative fees on New Assets are not subject to the above limitation and are based on an annual rate of 1.2% on Average Real Estate Assets, but are subject to the Expense Cap. New Assets are all Real Estate Assets that are not Contributed Assets.

For the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 and ~~2016,~~2018, the Company incurred advisory and administrative fees of $1.9 million and ~~$1.7~~$1.9 million, respectively. The amount paid for the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 and ~~2016~~2018 represents the maximum fee allowed on Contributed Assets ~~(as defined in the Advisory Agreement)~~ under the Advisory Agreement plus approximately $0.5 million and ~~$0.3~~$0.5 million, respectively, of advisory and administrative fees incurred on New ~~Assets (as defined in the Advisory Agreement).~~Assets. For the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 and ~~2016,~~2018, the Company incurred advisory and administrative fees of ~~$5.5~~$3.7 million and ~~$4.9~~$3.7 million, respectively. The amount paid for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 and ~~2016~~2018 represents the maximum fee allowed on Contributed Assets ~~(as defined in the Advisory Agreement)~~ under the Advisory Agreement plus approximately ~~$1.5~~$1.0 million and ~~$0.9~~$1.0 million, respectively, of advisory and administrative fees incurred on New ~~Assets (as defined in the Advisory Agreement). These fees are reflected on the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income in advisory and administrative fees.~~Assets.

The increase in advisory and administrative fees on New Assets between both the periods was due to the acquisition of additional properties classified as New Assets after the Spin-Off, for which the Adviser has elected to receive fees on, and the timing of the acquisitions (the Company acquired one property in July 2016 and one property in October 2016 that the Adviser elected to receive advisory and administrative fees on). For the three months and ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2019, the Adviser elected to voluntarily waive the advisory and administrative fees incurred on the ~~two~~twelve properties acquired ~~in December~~subsequent to October 2016, ~~the property acquired in February 2017~~which totaled approximately $1.8 million and ~~the property acquired in June 2017, which~~$3.3 million, respectively, and are considered to be permanently ~~waived for~~waived. For the ~~periods.~~three and six months ended June 30, 2018, the Adviser elected to voluntarily waive the advisory and administrative fees incurred on properties acquired subsequent to October 2016, which totaled approximately $0.9 million and $1.8 million, respectively, and are considered to be permanently waived. The Adviser is not contractually obligated to waive fees on New Assets in the future and may cease waiving fees on New Assets at its discretion.

The Company has in the past, and may in the future, utilize the services of affiliated parties. For the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 and ~~2016,~~2018, the Company paid approximately ~~$1.2~~$0.0 million and ~~$0.6~~$0.2 million, respectively, to NexBank Title, Inc. (“NexBank Title”). NexBank Title is an affiliate of the Adviser through common beneficial ownership. NexBank Title provides title insurance and work related to providing title insurance on properties related to acquisitions, dispositions and refinancing transactions. These amounts are either capitalized as real estate assets or deferred financing costs, expensed as loss on extinguishment of debt and modification costs, or expensed as selling costs when determining gain (loss) on sales of real estate, depending on the appropriate accounting as determined for each specific transaction.

In the normal course of business, the Company enters into various rehabilitation construction related purchase commitments with parties that provide these goods and services. In the event the Company were to terminate rehabilitation construction services prior to the completion of projects, the Company could potentially be committed to satisfy outstanding or uncompleted purchase orders with such parties. As of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2019, management does not anticipate any material deviations from schedule or budget related to rehabilitation projects currently in process.

In the normal course of business, the Company is subject to claims, lawsuits, and legal proceedings. While it is not possible to ascertain the ultimate outcome of all such matters, management believes that the aggregate amount of such liabilities, if any, in excess of amounts provided or covered by insurance, will not have a material adverse effect on the consolidated balance sheets or consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income of the Company. The Company is not involved in any material litigation nor, to management’s knowledge, is any material litigation currently threatened against the Company or its properties or subsidiaries.

The Company is not aware of any environmental liability with respect to the properties that could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, assets, or results of operations. However, there can be no assurance that such a material environmental liability does not exist. The existence of any such material environmental liability could have an adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations and cash flows.

Effective March 1, 2019, the Company maintains a partial self-insurance program for property casualty claims whereby it incurs the “first-loss” portion of a claim up to an aggregate loss amount. Claims resulting in losses in excess of a $100,000 per occurrence property deductible will be paid by the Company up to an aggregate amount of $1.2 million (the “Aggregate Amount”). For the period from March 1, 2019 to June 30, 2019, the Company has not incurred a claim it has funded as part of the Aggregate Amount. Under ASC 450-20 “Loss Contingencies”, the Company does not reserve for the Aggregate Amount or any portion thereof until a claim is made and the amount of the claim and the timing of payment on the claim can be reasonably estimated. For the period from March 1, 2019 to June 30, 2019, there were no potential claims that met the criteria as set forth under ASC 450-20. The Company believes it has sufficient resources through cash reserves and unused capacity on the Corporate Credit Facility to fund any potential future claims toward the Aggregate Amount.

~~Subsequent to~~directors declared a quarterly dividend of $0.275 per share, payable on September 30, ~~2017,~~2019 to stockholders of record on September 13, 2019.

On July 17, 2019, the Company, through the OP, acquired the following ~~property through a 1031 Exchange with the NAVA Portfolio and a reverse 1031 Exchange with Timberglen (anticipated to close in the first quarter of 2018)~~properties (dollars in thousands) ~~(unaudited)~~:

Property Name	Location	Date of Acquisition	Purchase Price			Debt			# Units		Ownership			Location	Date of Acquisition	Purchase Price		Mortgage Debt		# Units		Effective Ownership
Atera	Dallas, Texas	October 25, 2017	$	59,200	(1)	$	29,500	(2)		380		100	%
Residences at Glenview Reserve														Nashville, Tennessee	July 17, 2019	$	45,000	$	26,560		360		100	%
Residences at West Place														Orlando, Florida	July 17, 2019		55,000		33,817		342		100	%
																$	100,000	$	60,377		702

On June 25, 2019, the Company, through the OP, entered into a purchase and sale agreement with a large real estate investment firm (the “Buyer”) for the sale of the following proprieties. Closing of the disposition is subject to Buyer due diligence and customary closing conditions. The sales of the properties are expected to close on or before August 30, 2019.

~~On October 19, 2017,~~In conjunction with the ~~Company used proceeds from the sale~~acquisition of the ~~NAVA Portfolio to pay down approximately $46.0~~Residences at Glenview Reserve and the Residences at West Place, the OP drew $41.7 million on the ~~2017 Bridge Facility.~~

~~On October 26, 2017,~~Corporate Credit Facility on July 1, 2019. The OP drew an additional $10 million on July 24, 2019 to fund an earnest money deposit on additional acquisitions. As of July 30, 2019, the ~~Company, through the OP, amended the 2017 Bridge Facility (the “Extension”) to extend the maturity date~~drawn balance on the ~~remaining balance of approximately $8.6 million to March 31, 2018. The Company paid an amendment fee of approximately $34,000 in connection with the Extension.~~Corporate Credit Facility was $104.2 million.

On October 30, 2017, the Company’s board of directors increased the Company’s quarterly dividend 13.6%, or by $0.03 per share, declaring a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share, payable on December 29, 2017 to stockholders of record on December 15, 2017.

Item 2~~Item 2.~~. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following is a discussion and analysis of our financial condition and our historical results of operations. The following should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and accompanying notes. This discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those projected, forecasted, or expected in these forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including, but not limited to, those discussed below and elsewhere in this quarterly report. See “Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” in this report, and “Risk Factors” in Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors” of our annual report on Form 10-K (our “Annual Report”), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on ~~March 15, 2017.~~February 19, 2019.

As of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2019, our ~~portfolio~~Portfolio consisted of 3239 multifamily properties ~~(the “Portfolio”)~~ primarily located in the Southeastern and Southwestern United States encompassing ~~11,395~~13,407 units of apartment space that was approximately ~~94.0%~~94.4% leased with a weighted average monthly effective rent per occupied apartment unit of ~~$932.~~$1,016. Substantially all of our business is conducted through ~~NexPoint Residential Trust Operating Partnership, L.P. (the “OP”), our operating partnership.~~the OP. We own the Portfolio through the OP and our ~~wholly owned taxable REIT subsidiary (“TRS”).~~TRS. The OP owns approximately 99.9% of the Portfolio; our TRS owns approximately 0.1% of the Portfolio. ~~Our wholly owned subsidiary, NexPoint Residential Trust Operating Partnership~~The OP GP ~~LLC (the “OP GP”),~~ is the sole general partner of the OP. As of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2019, there were ~~21,116,902 common units in the~~23,819,402 OP ~~(“OP Units”)~~Units outstanding, of which ~~21,043,669,~~23,746,169, or 99.7%, were owned by us and 73,233, or 0.3%, were owned by an unaffiliated limited partner (see Note 10 to our consolidated financial statements).

We are primarily focused on directly or indirectly acquiring, owning, and operating well-located multifamily properties with a value-add component in large cities and suburban submarkets of large cities, primarily in the Southeastern and Southwestern United States. We generate revenue primarily by leasing our multifamily properties. We intend to employ targeted management and a value-add program at a majority of our properties in an attempt to improve rental rates and the net operating income (“NOI”) at our properties and achieve long-term capital appreciation for our stockholders. We are externally managed by ~~NexPoint Real Estate Advisors, L.P. (the “Adviser”)~~the Adviser through ~~an agreement dated March 16, 2015, as amended (the “Advisory Agreement”),~~the Advisory Agreement, by and among the OP, the Adviser and us. The Advisory Agreement was renewed on ~~March~~February 13, ~~2017~~2019 for a one-year term set to expire on March 16, ~~2018.~~2020. The Adviser is wholly owned by NexPoint Advisors, L.P., which is an affiliate of ~~Highland Capital Management, L.P. (the “Sponsor” or “Highland”).~~our Sponsor.

~~We began operations on March 31, 2015 as a result~~On February 20, 2019, the Company, the OP and the Adviser entered into separate equity distribution agreements (“Equity Distribution Agreements”) with each of Jefferies LLC (“Jefferies”), Raymond James & Associates, Inc. (“Raymond James”) and SunTrust Robinson Humphrey, Inc. (“SunTrust” and together with Jefferies and Raymond James, the “Sales Agents”), pursuant to which the Company may issue and sell from time to time shares of the ~~transfer and contribution by NexPoint Credit Strategies Fund (“NHF”)~~Company’s common stock, par value $0.01 per share, having an aggregate sales price of ~~all but one~~up to $100,000,000. Sales of the multifamily properties owned by NHF through its wholly owned subsidiary NexPoint Real Estate Opportunities, LLC (fka Freedom REIT, LLC) (“NREO”) in exchange for 100% of its outstanding common stock. We use the term “predecessor” to mean the carve-out business of NREO, which owned all or a majority interest in the multifamily properties transferred or contributed to us by NHF through NREO. On March 31, 2015, NHF distributed all of the outstanding shares of ~~our~~ common stock, held by NHF to holders of NHF common shares. We refer to the distribution of our common stock by NHF as the “Spin-Off.” Substantially all of our operations were conducted by our predecessor prior to March 31, 2015. With the exception of a nominal amount of initial cash funded at inception, we did not ownif any, ~~assets prior to March 31, 2015. Our predecessor included all of the properties~~may be made in ~~our Portfolio~~transactions that were held indirectly by NREO prior to the Spin-Off. Our predecessor was determined in accordance with the rules and regulations of the SEC. References throughout this report to the “Company,” “we,” or “our,” include the activity of the predecessor defined above.

On June 30, 2017, we and our OP entered into a contribution agreement (the “Contribution Agreement”) with BH Equities, LLC and its affiliates (collectively, “BH Equity”), whereby we purchased 100% of the joint venture interests in the Portfolio owned by BH Equity, representing approximately 8.4% ownership in the Portfolio (the “BH Buyout”), for total consideration of approximately $51.7 million (the “Purchase Amount”). The Purchase Amount consisted of approximately $49.7 million in cash that was paid on June 30, 2017 and 73,233 OP Units (initially valued at $2.0 million) that were issued on August 1, 2017. The number of OP Units issued was calculated by dividing $2.0 million by the midpoint of the range of our net asset value as publicly disclosed in connection with the release of our second quarter of 2017 earnings results, which was $27.31 per share. We financed the cash portion of the Purchase Amount with $21.4 million of proceeds from a bridge facility, $16.3 million of proceeds from refinancing 22 properties, $11.0 million of proceeds from a credit facility and $1.0 million of cash on hand. See Notes 6 and 10 to our consolidated financial statements for additional information.

In connection with the issuance of OP Units to BH Equity on August 1, 2017, we and our OP amended the partnership agreement of the OP (the “Amendment”). Pursuant to the Amendment, limited partners holding OP Units have the right to cause the OP to redeem their units for cash or, at our election, shares of our common stock on a one-for-one basis, subject to adjustment, as provided in the Amendment, provided that the units have been outstanding for at least one year. Notwithstanding the foregoing, a limited partner will not be entitled to exercise its redemption right to the extent the issuance of our common stock to the redeeming limited partner would (1) be prohibited, as determined in our sole discretion, under our charter or (2) cause the acquisition of common

~~stock by such redeeming limited partner~~are deemed to be ~~"integrated" with any other distribution of our common stock for purposes of complying with~~“at the market” offerings, as defined in Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, as ~~amended. Accordingly, we record~~amended, including, without limitation, sales made by means of ordinary brokers’ transactions on the ~~OP Units held by noncontrolling limited partners outside of permanent equity and report the OP Units~~New York Stock Exchange, to or through a market maker at market prices prevailing at the ~~greater~~time of ~~their carrying value~~sale, at prices related to prevailing market prices or at negotiated prices based on prevailing market prices (the “ATM Program”). In addition to the issuance and sale of shares of common stock, the Company may enter into forward sale agreements with each of Jefferies and Raymond James, or their ~~redemption value using our stock price at each balance sheet date. See Note 10 to our consolidated financial statements for additional information.~~

Onrespective affiliates, through the ATM Program. During the three months ended June 30, ~~2017, we entered into 22 first mortgages,~~2019, the Company issued 252,165 shares of common stock at an average price of $40.26 per share, for net proceeds of approximately $9.4 million. The Company paid approximately $0.2 million in fees to the Sales Agents with ~~a combined principal amount~~respect to such sales and incurred other issuance costs of ~~$502.1~~approximately $0.5 million, ~~on certain~~both of ~~our properties, replacing~~which were netted against the ~~$168.4 million of existing mortgage debt outstanding on nine properties~~gross proceeds and recorded in additional paid in capital. The ATM Program may be terminated by the ~~$300.0 million outstanding~~Company at any time and expires automatically once aggregate sales under ~~a credit facility (the “$300 Million Credit Facility”), which retired~~ the $300 Million Credit Facility. The refinancing of the existing mortgage debt incurred approximately $1.7 million of prepayment penalties, which is included in loss on extinguishment of debt and modification costs on the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income. The Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (“Freddie Mac”), who was the lender on the existing mortgage debt and the $300 Million Credit Facility, also originated the 22 new first mortgages (the “Freddie Refinance”). The additional proceeds from the Freddie Refinance were used to fund a portion of the BH Buyout. The Freddie Refinance effectively lowered the borrowing spread on $468.4 million of our floating rate debt by approximately 57 basis points, or $2.7 million on an annualized basis. ~~See Note 6 to our consolidated financial statements for additional information.~~

During the nine months ended September 30, 2017, we, through our OP, entered into three interest rate swap transactions with a combined notional amount of $250.0 million. As of September 30, 2017, we have entered into seven interest rate swap transactions with a combined notional amount of $650.0 million at a weighted average fixed rate of 1.3388%, effectively fixing the interest rate on approximately 96% of our $673.7 million of floating rate mortgage debt outstanding as of September 30, 2017. As of September 30, 2017, the adjusted weighted average interest rate of our total indebtedness was 3.34% (see Item 3, “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk” below, and Notes 6 and 7 to our consolidated financial statements).

~~On October 25, 2017, we purchased an additional multifamily property, Atera, located in Dallas, Texas, which encompasses 380 units of apartment space~~ATM Program reach $100,000,000 (see Note 138 to our consolidated financial statements).

We have elected to be taxed as a REIT under Sections 856 through 860 of the Code, and expect to continue to qualify as a REIT. To qualify as a REIT, we must meet a number of organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement that we distribute at least 90% of our REIT taxable income to our stockholders. As a REIT, we will be subject to federal income tax on our undistributed REIT taxable income and net capital gain and to a 4% nondeductible excise tax on any amount by which distributions we pay with respect to any calendar year are less than the sum of (1) 85% of our ordinary income, (2) 95% of our capital gain net income and (3) 100% of our undistributed income from prior years. We believe we qualify for taxation as a REIT under the Code, and we intend to continue to operate in such a manner, but no assurance can be given that we will operate in a manner so as to qualify as a REIT. Taxable income from certain non-REIT activities is managed through a TRS and is subject to applicable federal, state, and local income and margin taxes. We had no significant taxes associated with our TRS for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 and ~~2016.~~2018.

In August and September 2017, parts of Texas and Florida were hit by two hurricanes, causing severe property damage in the affected areas. As of September 30, 2017, we owned three properties in the Houston area, two properties in the Miami area, two properties in the Tampa Bay area, and two properties in the Orlando area. Our properties in these areas suffered minimal damage, which we estimate to be approximately $40,000.

Rental income. Our earnings are primarily attributable to the rental revenue from our multifamily properties. We anticipate that the leases we enter into for our multifamily properties will typically be for one year or ~~less.~~less on average.

Other income. Other income includes ancillary income earned from tenants such as application fees, late fees, laundry fees, utility reimbursements, and other rental related fees charged to tenants.

Property operating expenses. Property operating expenses include property maintenance costs, salary and employee benefit costs, utilities, casualty-related expenses and recoveries and other property operating costs.

~~Acquisition costs.~~ Acquisition costs include the costs to acquire additional properties. On October 1, 2016, we early adopted ASU 2017-01, which requires an entity to capitalize acquisition costs associated with an acquisition that is determined to be an acquisition of an asset as opposed to an acquisition of a business. Prior to our adoption of ASU 2017-01, acquisition costs were expensed as incurred. We believe most future acquisition costs will be capitalized in accordance with ASU 2017-01 (see Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements).

Real estate taxes and insurance. Real estate taxes include the property taxes assessed by local and state authorities depending on the location of each property. Insurance includes the cost of commercial, general liability, and other needed insurance for each property.

Property management fees. Property management fees include fees paid to BH, ~~Management Services, LLC (“BH”),~~ our property manager, or other third party management companies for managing each property (see Note 1110 to our consolidated financial statements).

Advisory and administrative fees. Advisory and administrative fees include the fees paid to our Adviser pursuant to the Advisory Agreement (see Note 11 to our consolidated financial statements).

Corporate general and administrative expenses. Corporate general and administrative expenses include, but are not limited to, ~~payments of reimbursements to the Adviser for operating expenses,~~ audit fees, legal fees, listing fees, board of director fees, equity-based compensation expense, ~~and~~ investor relations ~~costs.~~costs and payments of reimbursements to our Adviser for operating expenses. Corporate general and administrative expenses and the advisory and administrative fees paid to our Adviser (including advisory and administrative fees on properties defined in the Advisory Agreement as New Assets) will not exceed 1.5% of Average Real Estate Assets per calendar year (or part thereof that the Advisory Agreement is in effect), calculated in accordance with the Advisory Agreement, or the Expense Cap. The Expense Cap does not limit the reimbursement by us of expenses related to securities offerings paid by ~~the~~our Adviser. The Expense Cap also does not apply to legal, accounting, financial, due diligence, and other service fees incurred in connection with mergers and acquisitions, extraordinary litigation, or other events outside our ordinary course of business or any out-of-pocket acquisition or due diligence expenses incurred in connection with the acquisition or disposition of real estate assets. Additionally, in the sole discretion of the Adviser, the Adviser may elect to waive certain advisory and administrative fees otherwise due. If advisory and administrative fees are waived in a period, the waived fees for that period are considered to be waived permanently and the Adviser may not be reimbursed in the future.

Property general and administrative expenses. Property general and administrative expenses include the costs of marketing, professional fees, general office supplies, and other administrative related costs of each property.

Depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization costs primarily include depreciation of our multifamily properties and amortization of acquired in-place leases.

Interest expense. Interest expense primarily includes the cost of interest expense on debt, the amortization of deferred financing costs, ~~and~~ the related impact of interest rate derivatives used to manage our interest rate ~~risk.~~risk and fair market value adjustments on debt.

Loss on extinguishment of debt and modification costs. Loss on extinguishment of debt and modification costs includes prepayment penalties and defeasance costs, the write-off of unamortized deferred financing costs and fair market value adjustments of assumed debt related to the early ~~retirement~~repayment of debt, ~~and~~ costs incurred in a debt modification that are not capitalized as deferred financing ~~costs.~~costs and other costs incurred in a debt extinguishment.

Gain on sales of real estate. Gain on sales of real estate includes the gain recognized upon sales of properties. Gain on sales of real estate is calculated by deducting the carrying value of the real estate and costs incurred to sell the properties from the sales prices of the properties.

Results of Operations for the Three and ~~Nine~~Six Months Ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 and ~~2016~~2018

The three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 as compared to the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2018

The following table sets forth a summary of our operating results for the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 and ~~2016~~2018 (in thousands):

	For the Three Months Ended September 30,									For the Three Months Ended June 30,
	2017			2016			$ Change			2019			2018			$ Change
Total revenues	$	37,097		$	33,079		$	4,018		$	43,066		$	35,655		$	7,411
Total expenses		(32,340	)		(28,137	)		(4,203	)		(36,463	)		(30,420	)		(6,043	)
Operating income		4,757			4,942			(185	)		6,603			5,235			1,368
Interest expense		(8,257	)		(4,791	)		(3,466	)		(8,590	)		(6,823	)		(1,767	)
Loss on extinguishment of debt and modification costs		(914	)		(888	)		(26	)		—			(78	)		78
Gain on sales of real estate		58,490			9,562			48,928
Net income		54,076			8,825			45,251
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests		—			1,735			(1,735	)
Net income attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interests in the Operating Partnership		162			—			162
Net income attributable to common stockholders	$	53,914		$	7,090		$	46,824
Net loss											(1,987	)		(1,666	)		(321	)
Net loss attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interests in the Operating Partnership											(6	)		(5	)		(1	)
Net loss attributable to common stockholders										$	(1,981	)	$	(1,661	)	$	(320	)

The change in our net ~~income~~loss for the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 as compared to ~~the~~our net ~~income~~loss for the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2018 primarily relates to ~~increases~~an increase in ~~gain on sales of real estate~~interest expense and ~~same store operating results, and was~~total expenses partially offset by ~~increases~~an increase in depreciation and amortization expense and interest expense. The change in our net income between the periods was also due to our acquisition and disposition activity in 2016 and 2017 and the timing of the transactions (we acquired one property in the third quarter of 2016, three properties in the fourth quarter of 2016, one property in the first quarter of 2017 and one property in the second quarter of 2017; we sold three properties in the second quarter of 2016, four properties in the third quarter of 2016, four properties in the second quarter of 2017 and five properties in the third quarter of 2017).total revenues.

Rental income. Rental income was ~~$32.1~~$37.7 million for the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 compared to ~~$28.6~~$31.1 million for the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2018, which was an increase of approximately ~~$3.5~~$6.6 million. The increase between the periods was primarily due to our acquisition and disposition activity in 2018 and 2019 and the timing of the transactions (we purchased three properties in the first quarter of 2019 and one property in the second quarter of 2019; there were no acquisitions in the first or second quarter of 2018, and one disposition in the first quarter of 2018), and a ~~9.9%~~5.1% increase in the weighted average monthly effective rent per occupied apartment unit in our Portfolio to ~~$932~~$1,016 as of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 from ~~$848~~$967 as of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2018. The increase in effective rent was primarily driven by the value-add program that we have implemented and organic growth in rents in the markets where our properties are ~~located. The increase between the periods was also due to~~located as well as an increase in the occupancy rate of ~~the Portfolio of 0.4%~~0.2% to ~~94.0% as of September~~94.4% in June 30, ~~2017~~2019 from ~~93.6% as of September~~94.2% in June 30, ~~2016.~~2018.

Other income. Other income was ~~$4.9~~$5.4 million for the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 compared to ~~$4.4~~$4.6 million for the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2018, which was an increase of approximately ~~$0.5~~$0.8 million. The increase between the periods was primarily due to ~~a $0.3 million, or 15.0%, increase~~our acquisition and disposition activity in ~~utility reimbursements.~~2018 and 2019 and the timing of the transactions, as described above.

Property operating expenses. Property operating expenses were ~~$10.1~~$10.2 million for the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 compared to ~~$9.9~~$8.2 million for the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2018, which was an increase of approximately ~~$0.2~~$2.0 million. The increase between the periods was primarily due to our acquisition and disposition activity in 2018 and 2019 and the timing of the transactions, as described above. The increase between the periods was also due to a ~~$0.6~~$0.7 million, or ~~5.9%~~18.4%, increase in ~~total repairs~~labor costs and ~~maintenance, labor and utility costs, partially offset by~~ a ~~$0.4~~$0.5 million, or 16.1%, increase in ~~casualty recoveries.~~repairs & maintenance costs.

~~Acquisition costs.~~ No acquisition costs were expensed for the three months ended September 30, 2017 compared to $0.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2016. During the three months ended September 30, 2017, we did not acquire any properties. During the three months ended September 30, 2016, we acquired one property. For additional information on our accounting policy related to acquisition costs, see Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements. Acquisition costs depend on the specific circumstances of each closing and are one-time costs associated with each acquisition. We believe most future acquisition costs will be capitalized.

Real estate taxes and insurance. Real estate taxes and insurance costs were ~~$4.9~~$5.6 million for the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 compared to ~~$4.0~~$4.6 million for the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2018, which was an increase of approximately ~~$0.9~~$1.0 million. The increase between the periods was primarily due to our acquisition and disposition activity in 2018 and 2019 and the timing of the transactions, as described above. The increase between the periods was also due to a ~~$0.8~~$1.0 million, or ~~22.2%~~26.1%, increase in property ~~taxes and a $0.1 million, or 21.5%, increase in property liability insurance.~~taxes. Property taxes incurred in the first year of ownership may be significantly less than subsequent years since the purchase price of the property may trigger a significant increase in assessed value by the taxing authority in subsequent years, increasing the costs of real estate taxes.

Property management fees. Property management fees were $1.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2019 compared to $1.1 million for the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, 2017 compared to $1.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2016, which was an increase of approximately $0.1 million. The increase between the periods was primarily due to increases in rental income and other income, which the fee is primarily based on.

~~Advisory and administrative fees.~~ ~~Advisory and administrative fees were $1.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017 compared to $1.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2016,~~2018, which was an increase of approximately $0.2 million. The increase between periods was primarily due to an increase in total revenues, which the fee is primarily based on.

Advisory and administrative fees. Advisory and administrative fees remained flat at $1.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2019 compared to $1.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2018. The amount incurred during the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 and ~~2016~~2018 represents the maximum fee allowed on properties defined as Contributed Assets under the Advisory Agreement plus approximately $0.5 million and ~~$0.3~~$0.5 million, respectively, of advisory and administrative fees incurred on certain properties defined as New Assets. The increase in advisory and administrative fees on New Assets between the periods was due to the acquisition of additional properties classified as New Assets after the Spin-Off, for which our Adviser has elected to receive fees on, and the timing of the acquisitions (we acquired one property in July 2016 and one property in October 2016 that our Adviser elected to receive advisory and administrative fees on). For the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2019, our Adviser elected to voluntarily waive the advisory and administrative fees incurred on the ~~two~~twelve properties we acquired ~~in December~~subsequent to October 2016, ~~the property we acquired in February 2017~~which totaled approximately $1.7 million and ~~the property we acquired in June 2017, which~~ are considered to be permanently waived for the period. ~~The~~For the three months ended June 30, 2018, our Adviser elected to voluntarily waive the advisory and administrative fees incurred on the five properties we acquired subsequent to October 2016, which totaled approximately $0.9 million and are considered to be permanently waived. Our Adviser is not contractually obligated to waive fees on New Assets in the future and may cease waiving fees on New Assets at its discretion. Advisory and administrative fees may increase in future periods as we acquire additional properties, which will be classified as New Assets.

Corporate general and administrative expenses. Corporate general and administrative expenses were ~~$1.6~~$2.7 million for the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 compared to ~~$1.0~~$2.0 million for the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2018, which was an increase of approximately ~~$0.6~~$0.7 million. The increase between the periods was primarily ~~relates~~due to ~~$0.8~~approximately $1.4 million of equity-based compensation expense recognized during the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 related to the grants of restricted stock units to our directors, officers, employees and ~~officers~~certain key employees of our Adviser pursuant to our ~~2016 LTIP,~~long-term incentive plan (the “2016 LTIP”), compared to ~~$0.3~~$1.1 million of equity-based compensation expense recognized during the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2018 (see Note 8 to our consolidated financial statements). Subject to the Expense Cap, corporate general and administrative expenses may increase in future periods as we acquire additional ~~properties.~~properties, incur additional public company costs once we lose our status as an “emerging growth company” as defined in the JOBS Act or the Board issues additional equity grants under the 2016 LTIP.

Property general and administrative expenses. Property general and administrative expenses were $1.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2019 compared to $1.6 million for the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017 compared to $1.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2016,~~2018, which was an increase of approximately ~~$0.1~~$0.2 million. The increase between the periods was primarily due to our acquisition and disposition activity in 2018 and 2019 and the timing of the transactions, as described above.

Depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization costs were ~~$11.2~~$13.1 million for the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 compared to ~~$8.7~~$11.0 million for the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2018, which was an increase of approximately ~~$2.5~~$2.1 million. The increase between the periods was primarily due to the amortization of intangible lease assets of ~~$1.2~~$1.3 million related to ~~two~~four properties for the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 compared to $0.2 million related to one property for the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2018 which was an increase of approximately ~~$1.0 million, as well as the acquisition of five properties subsequent to September 30, 2016.~~$1.1 million. The amortization of intangible lease assets over a six-month period from the date of acquisition is expected to increase the amortization expense during the initial year of operations for each property. The increase between ~~the~~ periods was ~~partially offset by a reduction~~also due to an increase in depreciation expense of approximately $0.9 million, primarily related to the ~~disposition~~acquisition of ~~nine~~seven properties subsequent to ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016.~~2018.

Interest expense. Interest expense was ~~$8.3~~$8.6 million for the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 compared to ~~$4.8~~$6.8 million for the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2018, which was an increase of approximately ~~$3.5~~$1.8 million. The increase between the periods was primarily due to an increase in interest on debt ~~and a reduction~~of approximately $2.6 million partially offset by an increase in the gain recognized related to the ~~ineffective~~effective portion of changes in fair value of our interest rate swap derivatives designated as cash flow hedges of approximately $0.9 million (see “Debt, Derivatives and Hedging Activity – Interest Rate Swap Agreements” below)~~, as shown in the table below.~~. The following table details the various costs included in interest expense for the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 and ~~2016~~2018 (in thousands):

	For the Three Months Ended September 30,									For the Three Months Ended June 30,
	2017			2016			$ Change			2019			2018			$ Change
Interest on debt	$	7,262		$	4,524		$	2,738		$	10,000		$	7,363		$	2,637
Amortization of deferred financing costs		572			385			187			470			352			118
Interest rate swaps - effective portion		263			472			(209	)
Interest rate swaps - ineffective portion		(32	)		(599	)		567
Interest rate swaps											(1,882	)		(962	)		(920	)
Interest rate caps expense		192			9			183			2			70			(68	)
Total	$	8,257		$	4,791		$	3,466		$	8,590		$	6,823		$	1,767

Loss on extinguishment of debt and modification costs. Loss on extinguishment of debt and modification costs ~~remained flat at $0.9~~was $- million for the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 compared to ~~$0.9~~$0.1 million for the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016.~~2018, which was a decrease of approximately $0.1 million. The decrease between the periods was primarily due to decreases in write-offs of deferred financing costs of $0.1 million. The following table details the various costs included in loss on extinguishment of debt and modification costs for the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 and ~~2016~~2018 (in thousands):

	For the Three Months Ended September 30,								For the Three Months Ended June 30,
	2017			2016		$ Change			2019		2018			$ Change
Prepayment penalties	$	502		$	474	$	28
Write-off of deferred financing costs		622			414		208			—		105			(105	)
Debt modification costs (reimbursements)		(210	)		—		(210	)
Write-off of fair market value adjustment of assumed debt										—		(27	)		27
Total	$	914		$	888	$	26		$	—	$	78		$	(78	)

Gain on sales of real estate. ~~Gain~~We did not recognize a gain on sales of real estate ~~was $58.5 million~~ for the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017 compared to $9.6 million for~~2019 as we did not sell any properties during the ~~three months ended~~ ~~September~~ ~~30, 2016, which was an increase of approximately $48.9 million.~~period. During the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2018, we ~~sold five properties; during the three months ended~~ ~~September~~ ~~30, 2016, we sold four~~did not sell any properties.

The ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 as compared to the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2018

The following table sets forth a summary of our operating results for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 and ~~2016~~2018 (in thousands):

	For the Nine Months Ended September 30,									For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2017			2016			$ Change			2019			2018			$ Change
Total revenues	$	109,322		$	100,247		$	9,075		$	84,557		$	70,712		$	13,845
Total expenses		(98,810	)		(83,095	)		(15,715	)		(74,239	)		(61,777	)		(12,462	)
Operating income before gain on sales of real estate											10,318			8,935			1,383
Gain on sales of real estate											—			13,742			(13,742	)
Operating income		10,512			17,152			(6,640	)		10,318			22,677			(12,359	)
Interest expense		(22,479	)		(15,650	)		(6,829	)		(16,678	)		(13,620	)		(3,058	)
Loss on extinguishment of debt and modification costs		(5,717	)		(1,722	)		(3,995	)		—			(629	)		629
Gain on sales of real estate		78,386			25,932			52,454
Net income		60,702			25,712			34,990
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests		2,836			4,047			(1,211	)
Net income attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interests in the Operating Partnership		162			—			162
Net income attributable to common stockholders	$	57,704		$	21,665		$	36,039
Net income (loss)											(6,360	)		8,428			(14,788	)
Net income (loss) attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interests in the Operating Partnership											(19	)		25			(44	)
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders										$	(6,341	)	$	8,403		$	(14,744	)

The change in our net ~~income~~loss for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 as compared to the net income for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2018 primarily relates to ~~increases~~a decrease in gain on sales of real estate, an increase in total expenses, and ~~same store operating results,~~an increase in interest expenses, and was partially offset by ~~increases~~an increase in ~~depreciation~~total revenues and ~~amortization expense, interest expense and~~decreases in loss on extinguishment of debt and modification costs. The change in our net ~~income~~loss between the periods was also due to our acquisition and disposition activity in ~~2016~~2019 and ~~2017~~2018 and the timing of the transactions (we ~~acquired one property in the third quarter of 2016,~~purchased three properties ~~in the fourth quarter of 2016, one property~~ in the first quarter of ~~2017~~2019 and one property in the second quarter of ~~2017; we sold three properties~~2019; there were no acquisitions in the first or second quarter of ~~2016, four properties~~2018, and one disposition in the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2016, four properties in the second quarter of 2017 and five properties in the third quarter of 2017)~~2018).

Rental income. Rental income was ~~$94.6~~$74.0 million for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 compared to ~~$87.4~~$61.6 million for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2018, which was an increase of approximately ~~$7.2~~$12.4 million. The increase between the periods was primarily due to ~~an 9.9%~~our acquisition and disposition activity in 2018 and 2019 and the timing of the transactions, as described above, and a 5.1% increase in the weighted average monthly effective rent per occupied apartment unit in our Portfolio to ~~$932~~$1,016 as of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 from ~~$848~~$967 as of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2018. The increase in effective rent was primarily driven by the value-add program that we have implemented and organic growth in rents in the markets where our properties are located. The increase between the periods was also due to an increase in the occupancy rate of ~~the~~our Portfolio of ~~0.4%~~0.2% to ~~94.0%~~94.4% as of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 from ~~93.6%~~94.2% as of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016.~~2018.

Other income. Other income was ~~$14.8~~$10.5 million for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 compared to ~~$12.8~~$9.1 million for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2018, which was an increase of approximately ~~$2.0~~$1.4 million. The increase between the periods was primarily due to our acquisition and disposition activity in 2018 and 2019 and the timing of the transactions, as described above, as well as a ~~$1.1 million, or 16.3%,~~4.0% increase in ~~utility reimbursements.~~other income collected at existing properties.

Property operating expenses. Property operating expenses were ~~$29.6~~$19.8 million for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 compared to ~~$28.9~~$17.1 million for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2018, which was an increase of approximately ~~$0.7~~$2.7 million. The increase between the periods was primarily due to our acquisition and disposition activity in 2018 and 2019 and the timing of the transactions, as described above. The increase between the periods was also due to a $1.0 million, or 17.6%, increase in repairs and maintenance costs and a $1.1 million, or ~~3.8%~~15.4%, increase in ~~total repairs and maintenance,~~ labor ~~and utility costs, partially offset by a $0.4 million increase in casualty recoveries.~~

~~Acquisition~~ costs. No acquisition costs were expensed for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to $0.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016. During the nine months ended September 30, 2017, we acquired two properties. During the nine months ended September 30, 2016, we acquired one property. For additional information on our accounting policy related to acquisition costs, see Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements. Acquisition costs depend on the specific circumstances of each closing and are one-time costs associated with each acquisition. We believe most future acquisition costs will be capitalized.

Real estate taxes and insurance. Real estate taxes and insurance costs were ~~$14.9~~$11.3 million for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 compared to ~~$12.3~~$9.4 million for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2018, which was an increase of approximately ~~$2.6~~$1.9 million. The increase between the periods was primarily due to a ~~$2.4~~$1.8 million, or ~~22.9%~~22.7%, increase in property ~~taxes and a $0.2 million, or 10.7%, increase in property liability insurance.~~taxes. Property taxes incurred in the first year of ownership may be significantly less than subsequent years since the purchase price of the property may trigger a significant increase in assessed value by the taxing authority in subsequent years, increasing the ~~costs~~cost of real estate taxes.

Property management fees. Property management fees were ~~$3.3~~$2.5 million for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 compared to ~~$3.0~~$2.1 million for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2018, which was an increase of approximately ~~$0.3~~$0.4 million. The increase between the periods was primarily due to ~~increases~~an increase in ~~rental income and other income,~~total revenues, which the fee is primarily based on.

Advisory and administrative fees. Advisory and administrative fees ~~were $5.5~~remained flat at $3.7 million for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 compared to ~~$4.9~~$3.7 million for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016, which was an increase of approximately $0.6 million.~~2018. The amount incurred during the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 and ~~2016~~2018 represents the maximum fee allowed on properties defined as Contributed Assets under the Advisory Agreement plus approximately ~~$1.5~~$1.0 million and ~~$0.9~~$1.0 million, respectively, of advisory and administrative fees incurred on certain properties defined as New Assets. The increase in advisory and administrative fees on New Assets between the periods was due to the acquisition of additional properties classified as New Assets after the Spin-Off, for which our Adviser has elected to receive fees on, and the timing of the acquisitions (we acquired one property in July 2016 and one property in October 2016 that our Adviser elected to receive advisory and administrative fees on). For the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2019, our Adviser elected to voluntarily waive the advisory and administrative fees incurred on the ~~two~~twelve properties we acquired ~~in December~~subsequent to October 2016, which totaled approximately $3.3 million and are considered to be permanently waived. For the ~~property~~six months ended June 30, 2018, our Adviser elected to voluntarily waive the advisory and administrative fees incurred on the properties we acquired ~~in February 2017~~subsequent to October 2016, which totaled approximately $1.8 million and ~~the property we acquired in June 2017, which~~ are considered to be permanently waived for the period. ~~The~~Our Adviser is not contractually obligated to waive fees on New Assets in the

future and may cease waiving fees on New Assets at its discretion. Advisory and administrative fees may increase in future periods as we acquire additional properties, which will be classified as New Assets.

Corporate general and administrative expenses. Corporate general and administrative expenses were ~~$4.8~~$5.0 million for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 compared to ~~$2.6~~$3.8 million for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2018, which was an increase of approximately ~~$2.2~~$1.2 million. The increase between the periods was primarily ~~relates~~due to ~~$2.4~~approximately $2.7 million of equity-based compensation expense recognized during the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 related to the grants of restricted stock units to our directors, officers, employees and ~~officers~~certain key employees of our Adviser pursuant to our ~~2016 LTIP,~~long-term incentive plan (the “2016 LTIP”), compared to ~~$0.3~~$2.0 million of equity-based compensation expense recognized during the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2018 (see Note 8 to our consolidated financial statements). Subject to the Expense Cap, corporate general and administrative expenses may increase in future periods as we acquire additional ~~properties.~~properties, incur additional public company costs once we lose our status as an “emerging growth company” as defined in the JOBS Act or the Board issues additional equity grants under the 2016 LTIP.

Property general and administrative expenses. Property general and administrative expenses were ~~$4.8~~$3.4 million for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 compared to ~~$4.5~~$3.2 million for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2018, which was an increase of approximately ~~$0.3~~$0.2 million. The increase between the periods was primarily due to ~~a $0.2 million, or 15.9%, increase~~our acquisition and disposition activity in ~~advertising~~2018 and ~~promotional costs.~~2019 and the timing of the transactions, as described above.

Depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization costs were ~~$35.9~~$28.5 million for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 compared to ~~$26.4~~$22.4 million for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2018, which was an increase of approximately ~~$9.5~~$6.1 million. The increase between the periods was primarily due to the amortization of intangible lease assets of ~~$6.4~~$3.5 million related to ~~six~~seven properties for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 compared to ~~$0.9~~$0.8 million related to ~~four properties~~one property for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2018, which was an increase of approximately ~~$5.5~~$2.7 million. The increase between the periods was also due to an increase of $3.4 million in depreciation expense, primarily due to our acquisition activity in 2018 and 2019 and the timing of the transactions, as ~~well as the acquisition of five properties subsequent to September 30, 2016.~~described above. The amortization of intangible lease assets over a six-month period from the date of acquisition is expected to increase the amortization expense during the ~~initial~~ year of ~~operations~~acquisition for each property. ~~The increase between the periods was partially offset by a reduction in depreciation expense related to the disposition of nine properties subsequent to September 30, 2016.~~

Interest expense. Interest expense was ~~$22.5~~$16.7 million for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 compared to ~~$15.7~~$13.6 million for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2018, which was an increase of approximately ~~$6.8~~$3.1 million. The increase between the periods was primarily due to an increase in interest on debt of $5.4 million related to our acquisition activity in 2018 and ~~a reduction~~2019. This increase was partially offset by an increase in gain recognized related to the ~~ineffective~~effective portion of changes in fair value of our interest rate swap derivatives designated as cash flow hedges of approximately $2.4 million (see “Debt, Derivatives and Hedging Activity – Interest Rate Swap Agreements” below)~~, as shown in the table below.~~. The following table details the various costs included in interest expense for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 and ~~2016~~2018 (in thousands):

	For the Nine Months Ended September 30,								For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2017			2016			$ Change		2019			2018			$ Change
Interest on debt	$	19,696		$	14,666		$	5,030	$	19,510		$	14,120		$	5,390
Amortization of deferred financing costs		1,548			1,084			464		902			741			161
Interest rate swaps - effective portion		939			472			467
Interest rate swaps - ineffective portion		(97	)		(599	)		502
Interest rate swaps										(3,762	)		(1,386	)		(2,376	)
Interest rate caps expense		393			27			366		28			145			(117	)
Total	$	22,479		$	15,650		$	6,829	$	16,678		$	13,620		$	3,058

Loss on extinguishment of debt and modification costs. ~~Loss~~There was were no losses on extinguishment of debt and modification costs ~~was $5.7~~for the six months ended June 30, 2019 compared to $0.1 million for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017 compared to $1.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016,~~2018, which was ~~an increase~~a decrease of approximately ~~$4.0~~$0.6 million. The ~~increase~~decrease between the periods was primarily due to ~~increases~~decreases in prepayment penalties and defeasance costs of approximately ~~$1.9~~$0.2 million and ~~debt modification expenses~~a decrease in deferred financing costs of approximately ~~$1.8~~$0.5 million. ~~During the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, we sold nine properties and seven properties, respectively.~~ The following table details the various costs included in loss on extinguishment of debt and modification costs for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 and ~~2016~~2018 (in thousands):

	For the Nine Months Ended September 30,						For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2017		2016		$ Change		2019		2018			$ Change
Prepayment penalties	$	2,701	$	827	$	1,874
Prepayment penalties and defeasance costs							$	—	$	172		$	(172	)
Write-off of deferred financing costs		1,003		698		305		—		484			(484	)
Debt modification costs		2,013		197		1,816
Write-off of fair market value adjustment of assumed debt								—		(27	)		27
Total	$	5,717	$	1,722	$	3,995	$	—	$	629		$	(629	)

Gain on sales of real estate. ~~Gain on~~There were no sales of real estate during the six months ended June 30, 2019. Gain on sale of real estate was ~~$78.4~~$13.7 million for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017 compared to $25.9 million for the nine months ended~~ ~~September~~ ~~30, 2016,~~2018, which was ~~an increase~~a decrease of approximately ~~$52.5~~$13.7 million. ~~During the nine months ended~~ ~~September~~ ~~30, 2017, we sold nine properties; during the nine months ended~~ ~~September~~ ~~30, 2016, we sold seven properties.~~

NOI is a non-GAAP financial measure of performance. NOI is used by investors and our management to evaluate and compare the performance of our properties to other comparable properties, to determine trends in earnings and to compute the fair value of our properties as NOI is not affected by (1) the cost of funds, (2) acquisition costs, (3) advisory and administrative fees, (4) the impact of depreciation and amortization expenses as well as gains or losses from the sale of operating real estate assets that are included in net income computed in accordance with GAAP, (5) corporate general and administrative expenses, (6) other gains and losses that are specific to us, (7) casualty-related expenses/(recoveries) and (8) property general and administrative expenses that are not reflective of the continuing operations of the properties or are incurred on our behalf ~~of the Company~~ at the property for expenses such as legal, professional and franchise tax fees.

The cost of funds is eliminated from net income (loss) because it is specific to our particular financing capabilities and constraints. The cost of funds is also eliminated because it is dependent on historical interest rates and other costs of capital as well as past decisions made by us regarding the appropriate mix of capital, which may have changed or may change in the future. Acquisition costs and non-operating fees to affiliates are eliminated because they do not reflect continuing operating costs of the property owner. Depreciation and amortization expenses as well as gains or losses from the sale of operating real estate assets are eliminated because they may not accurately represent the actual change in value in our multifamily properties that result from use of the properties or changes in market conditions. While certain aspects of real property do decline in value over time in a manner that is reasonably captured by depreciation and amortization, the value of the properties as a whole have historically increased or decreased as a result of changes in overall economic conditions instead of from actual use of the property or the passage of time. Gains and losses from the sale of real property vary from property to property and are affected by market conditions at the time of sale, which will usually change from period to period. Casualty-related expenses and recoveries are excluded because they do not reflect continuing operating costs of the property owner. Entity level general and administrative expenses incurred at the properties are eliminated as they are specific to the way in which we have chosen to hold our properties and are the result of our ownership structuring. Also, expenses that

are incurred upon acquisition of a property do not reflect continuing operating costs of the property owner. These gains and losses can create distortions when comparing one period to another or when comparing our operating results to the operating results of other real estate companies that have not made similarly timed purchases or sales. We believe that eliminating these items from net income is useful because the resulting measure captures the actual ongoing revenue generated and actual expenses incurred in operating our properties as well as trends in occupancy rates, rental rates and operating costs.

However, the usefulness of NOI is limited because it excludes corporate general and administrative expenses, interest expense, loss on extinguishment of debt and modification costs, acquisition costs, certain fees to affiliates such as advisory and administrative fees, depreciation and amortization expense and gains or losses from the sale of properties, and other gains and losses as determined under GAAP, the level of capital expenditures and leasing costs necessary to maintain the operating performance of our properties, all of which are significant economic costs. NOI may fail to capture significant trends in these components of net income, which further limits its usefulness.

NOI is a measure of the operating performance of our properties but does not measure our performance as a whole. NOI is therefore not a substitute for net income (loss) as computed in accordance with GAAP. This measure should be analyzed in conjunction with net income (loss) computed in accordance with GAAP and discussions elsewhere in “—Results of Operations” regarding the components of net income (loss) that are eliminated in the calculation of NOI. Other companies may use different methods for calculating NOI or similarly entitled measures and, accordingly, our NOI may not be comparable to similarly entitled measures reported by other companies that do not define the measure exactly as we do.

We define ~~Same~~“Same Store ~~NOI~~NOI” as NOI for our properties that are comparable between periods. We view Same Store NOI as an important measure of the operating performance of our properties because it allows us to compare operating results of properties owned for the entirety of the current and comparable periods and therefore eliminates variations caused by acquisitions or dispositions during the periods.

Net Operating Income for Our Q2 Same Store and Non-Same Store Properties for the Three Months Ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 and ~~2016~~2018

There are 32 properties encompassing 11,471 units of apartment space in our same store pool for the three months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 (our “Q2 Same Store” properties). Our Q2 Same Store properties exclude the following seven properties in our Portfolio as of June 30, 2019: Cedar Pointe, Crestmont Reserve, Brandywine I & II, Bella Vista, The Enclave, The Heritage and Summers Landing.

The following table reflects the revenues, property operating expenses and NOI for the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 and ~~2016~~2018 for our Q2 Same Store and Non-Same Store properties (dollars in thousands):

	For the Three Months Ended September 30,										For the Three Months Ended June 30,
	2017		2016		$ Change			% Change			2019		2018			$ Change			% Change
Revenues
Same Store
Rental income	$	22,191	$	20,841	$	1,350			6.5	%	$	32,341	$	31,072		$	1,269			4.1	%
Other income		3,591		3,227		364			11.3	%		4,721		4,570			151			3.3	%
Same Store revenues		25,782		24,068		1,714			7.1	%		37,062		35,642			1,420			4.0	%
Non-Same Store
Rental income		9,957		7,791		2,166			27.8	%		5,370		(3	)		5,373		N/M
Other income		1,358		1,220		138			11.3	%		634		16			618		N/M
Non-Same Store revenues		11,315		9,011		2,304			25.6	%		6,004		13			5,991		N/M
Total revenues		37,097		33,079		4,018			12.1	%		43,066		35,655			7,411			20.8	%

Operating expenses
Same Store
Property operating expenses (1)		7,208		6,983		225			3.2	%		8,927		8,930			(3	)		0.0	%
Real estate taxes and insurance		3,201		2,920		281			9.6	%		4,959		4,630			329			7.1	%
Property management fees (2)		775		721		54			7.5	%		1,112		1,066			46			4.3	%
Property general and administrative expenses (3)		840		857		(17	)		-2.0	%		1,227		1,242			(15	)		-1.2	%
Same Store operating expenses		12,024		11,481		543			4.7	%		16,225		15,868			357			2.2	%
Non-Same Store
Property operating expenses (4)		3,248		2,888		360			12.5	%		1,277		(9	)		1,286		N/M
Real estate taxes and insurance		1,652		1,053		599			56.9	%		605		(42	)		647		N/M
Property management fees (2)		335		268		67			25.0	%		179		—			179		N/M
Property general and administrative expenses (5)		327		324		3			0.9	%		202		—			202		N/M
Non-Same Store operating expenses		5,562		4,533		1,029			22.7	%		2,263		(51	)		2,314		N/M
Total operating expenses		17,586		16,014		1,572			9.8	%		18,488		15,817			2,671			16.9	%

NOI
Same Store		13,758		12,587		1,171			9.3	%		20,837		19,774			1,063			5.4	%
Non-Same Store		5,753		4,478		1,275			28.5	%		3,741		64			3,677		N/M
Total NOI	$	19,511	$	17,065	$	2,446			14.3	%	$	24,578	$	19,838		$	4,740			23.9	%

~~See reconciliation of net income to NOI below under “NOI and Same Store NOI for the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 and 2016.”~~

~~Same Store Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended September 30, 2017 and 2016~~

~~There are 26 properties encompassing 8,871 units of apartment space in our same store pool for the three months ended~~ ~~September~~ ~~30, 2017 (our “Same Store” properties). As of~~ ~~September~~ ~~30, 2017, our Same Store properties were approximately 94.4% leased with a weighted average monthly effective rent per occupied apartment unit of $893. As of~~ ~~September~~ 30, 2016, our Same Store properties were approximately 94.4% leased with a weighted average monthly effective rent per occupied apartment unit of $846. For our Same Store properties, we recorded the following operating results for the three months ended ~~September~~ ~~30, 2017 as compared to the three months ended~~ ~~September~~ ~~30, 2016:~~

~~Rental income. Rental income was $22.2 million for the three months ended~~ ~~September~~ ~~30, 2017 compared to $20.8 million for the three months ended~~ ~~September~~ 30, 2016, which was an increase of approximately $1.4 million, or 6.5%. The majority of the increase is primarily related to a 5.5% increase in the weighted average monthly effective rent per occupied apartment unit to $893 as of ~~September~~ ~~30, 2017 from $846 as of~~ ~~September~~ ~~30, 2016.~~

~~Other income.~~ ~~Other income was $3.6 million for the three months ended~~ ~~September~~ ~~30, 2017 compared to $3.2 million for the three months ended~~ ~~September~~ 30, 2016, which was an increase of approximately $0.4 million, or 11.3%. The majority of the increase is related to a $0.2 million, or 10.4%, increase in utility reimbursements and a $0.1 million, or 7.4%, increase in administrative and application fees.

~~Property operating expenses.~~ ~~Property operating expenses were $7.2 million for the three months ended~~ ~~September~~ ~~30, 2017 compared to $7.0 million for the three months ended~~ ~~September~~ ~~30, 2016, which was an increase of approximately $0.2 million, or 3.2%. The majority of the increase is related to a $0.2 million, or 10.6%, increase in repairs and maintenance costs.~~

~~Real estate taxes and insurance.~~ ~~Real estate taxes and insurance costs were $3.2 million for the three months ended~~ ~~September~~ ~~30, 2017 compared to $2.9 million for the three months ended~~ ~~September~~ 30, 2016, which was an increase of approximately $0.3 million, or 9.6%. The majority of the increase is related to a $0.2 million, or 9.6%, increase in property taxes and a less than $0.1 million, or 9.8%, increase in property liability insurance.

~~Property management fees.~~ ~~Property management fees were $0.8 million for the three months ended~~ ~~September~~ ~~30, 2017 compared to $0.7 million for the three months ended~~ ~~September~~ 30, 2016, which was an increase of approximately $0.1 million, or 7.5%. The majority of the increase is related to a $1.4 million, or 6.5%, increase in rental income, and a $0.4 million, or 11.3%, increase in other income, which the fee is primarily based on.

~~Property general and administrative expenses.~~ ~~Property general and administrative expenses were $0.8 million for the three months ended~~ ~~September~~ ~~30, 2017 compared to $0.9 million for the three months ended~~ ~~September~~ ~~30, 2016, which was a decrease of approximately $0.1 million, or 2.0%.~~

~~The following table reflects the revenues, property operating expenses and NOI for the nine months ended~~ ~~September~~ ~~30, 2017 and 2016 for our Same Store and Non-Same Store properties (dollars in thousands):~~

For the Nine Months Ended September 30,

2017

2016

$ Change

% Change

Revenues

Same Store

Rental income

$
65,311

$
61,525

$
3,786

6.2
%
Other income

10,421

9,178

1,243

13.5
%
Same Store revenues

75,732

70,703

5,029

7.1
%
Non-Same Store

Rental income

29,253

25,881

3,372

13.0
%
Other income

4,337

3,663

674

18.4
%
Non-Same Store revenues

33,590

29,544

4,046

13.7
%
Total revenues

109,322

100,247

9,075

9.1
%

Operating expenses

Same Store

Property operating expenses (1)

20,625

19,723

902

4.6
%
Real estate taxes and insurance

9,632

8,704

928

10.7
%
Property management fees (2)

2,274

2,122

152

7.2
%
Property general and administrative expenses (3)

2,698

2,620

78

3.0
%
Same Store operating expenses

35,229

33,169

2,060

6.2
%
Non-Same Store

Property operating expenses (4)

9,337

9,133

204

2.2
%
Real estate taxes and insurance

5,279

3,622

1,657

45.7
%
Property management fees (2)

1,006

885

121

13.7
%
Property general and administrative expenses (5)

1,154

1,226

(72
)

-5.9
%
Non-Same Store operating expenses

16,776

14,866

1,910

12.8
%
Total operating expenses

52,005

48,035

3,970

8.3
%

NOI

Same Store

40,503

37,534

2,969

7.9
%
Non-Same Store

16,814

14,678

2,136

14.6
%
Total NOI

$
57,317

$
52,212

$
5,105

9.8
%

See reconciliation of net income (loss) to NOI below under “NOI and Same Store NOI for the Three and ~~Nine~~Six Months Ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 and ~~2016.~~2018.”

Q2 Same Store Results of Operations for the ~~Nine~~Three Months Ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 and ~~2016~~2018

~~There are 26 properties encompassing 8,871 units of apartment space in our same store pool for the nine months ended~~ ~~September~~ ~~30, 2017 (our “Same Store” properties).~~ As of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2019, our Q2 Same Store properties were approximately ~~94.4%~~94.6% leased with a weighted average monthly effective rent per occupied apartment unit of ~~$893.~~$1,009. As of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2018, our Q2 Same

Store properties were approximately ~~94.4%~~94.2% leased with a weighted average monthly effective rent per occupied apartment unit of ~~$846.~~$967. For our Q2 Same Store properties, we recorded the following operating results for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 as compared to the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016:~~2018:

Rental income. Rental income was ~~$65.3~~$32.3 million for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 compared to ~~$61.5~~$31.1 million for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2018, which was an increase of approximately ~~$3.8~~$1.2 million, or ~~6.2%~~4.1%. The majority of the increase is ~~primarily~~ related to a ~~5.5%~~4.3% increase in the weighted average monthly effective rent per occupied apartment unit to ~~$893~~$1,009 as of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 from ~~$846~~$967 as of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016.~~2018, partially offset by a 0.4% increase in occupancy.

Other income. Other income was ~~$10.4~~$4.7 million for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 compared to ~~$9.2~~$4.6 million for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2018, which was an increase of approximately ~~$1.2~~$0.1 million, or ~~13.5%~~3.3%. The majority of the increase is related to a ~~$0.6~~$0.1 million, or ~~11.9%~~27.2%, increase in ~~utility reimbursements~~non-refundable fees.

Property operating expenses. Property operating expenses remained flat at $8.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2019 compared to $8.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2018.

Real estate taxes and insurance. Real estate taxes and insurance costs were $5.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2019 compared to $4.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2018, which was an increase of approximately $0.4 million, or 7.1%. The majority of the increase is related to a $0.5 million, or 11.5%, increase in property taxes partially offset by a $0.1 million, or 17.1%, decrease in insurance expenses.

Property management fees. Property management fees remained flat at $1.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2019 compared to $1.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2018.

Property general and administrative expenses. Property general and administrative expenses remained flat at $1.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2019 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2018.

Net Operating Income for Our YTD Same Store and Non-Same Store Properties for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2019 and 2018

There are 32 properties encompassing 11,471 units of apartment space in our same store pool for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 (our “YTD Same Store” properties). Our YTD Same Store properties exclude the following seven properties in our Portfolio as of June 30, 2019: Cedar Pointe, Crestmont Reserve, Brandywine I & II, Bella Vista, The Enclave, The Heritage and Summers Landing.

The following table reflects the revenues, property operating expenses and NOI for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 for our YTD Same Store and Non-Same Store properties (dollars in thousands):

	For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2019		2018			$ Change			% Change
Revenues
Same Store
Rental income	$	64,125	$	61,427		$	2,698			4.4	%
Other income		9,415		9,053			362			4.0	%
Same Store revenues		73,540		70,480			3,060			4.3	%
Non-Same Store
Rental income		9,908		215			9,693		N/M
Other income		1,109		17			1,092		N/M
Non-Same Store revenues		11,017		232			10,785		N/M
Total revenues		84,557		70,712			13,845			19.6	%

Operating expenses
Same Store
Property operating expenses (1)		17,507		17,666			(159	)		-0.9	%
Real estate taxes and insurance		10,184		9,448			736			7.8	%
Property management fees (2)		2,204		2,111			93			4.4	%
Property general and administrative expenses (3)		2,392		2,397			(5	)		-0.2	%
Same Store operating expenses		32,287		31,622			665			2.1	%
Non-Same Store
Property operating expenses (4)		2,300		108			2,192		N/M
Real estate taxes and insurance		1,138		(4	)		1,142		N/M
Property management fees (2)		327		9			318		N/M
Property general and administrative expenses (5)		338		12			326		N/M
Non-Same Store operating expenses		4,103		125			3,978		N/M
Total operating expenses		36,390		31,747			4,643			14.6	%

NOI
Same Store		41,253		38,858			2,395			6.2	%
Non-Same Store		6,914		107			6,807		N/M
Total NOI	$	48,167	$	38,965		$	9,202			23.6	%

See reconciliation of net income (loss) to NOI below under “NOI and Same Store NOI for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2019 and 2018.”

YTD Same Store Results of Operations for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2019 and 2018

As of June 30, 2019, our YTD Same Store properties were approximately 94.6% leased with a weighted average monthly effective rent per occupied apartment unit of $1,009. As of June 30, 2018, our YTD Same Store properties were approximately 94.2% leased with a weighted average monthly effective rent per occupied apartment unit of $967. For our YTD Same Store properties, we recorded the following operating results for the six months ended June 30, 2019 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2018:

Rental income. Rental income was $64.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2019 compared to $61.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018, which was an increase of approximately $2.7 million, or 4.4%. The majority of the increase is related to a 4.3% increase in the weighted average monthly effective rent per occupied apartment unit to $1,009 as of June 30, 2019 from $967 as of June 30, 2018, partially offset by a 0.4% increase in occupancy.

Other income. Other income was $9.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2019 compared to $9.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018, which was an increase of approximately $0.3 million, or ~~9.8%~~4.0%. The majority of the increase is related to a $0.2 million, or 28%, increase in ~~administrative and application fees.~~non-refundable charges.

Property operating expenses. Property operating expenses were ~~$20.6~~$17.5 million for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 compared to ~~$19.7~~$17.7 million for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2018, which was ~~an increase~~a decrease of approximately ~~$0.9~~$0.2 million, or ~~4.6%~~0.9%. The majority of the ~~increase~~decrease is related to a ~~$0.8~~$0.7 million, or ~~14.2%~~15.5%, decrease in utility costs, partially offset by a $0.3 million, or 6.0%, increase in ~~repairs~~repair and maintenance costs and a $0.2 million, or 2.8%, increase in labor costs.

Real estate taxes and insurance. Real estate taxes and insurance costs were ~~$9.6~~$10.2 million for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 compared to ~~$8.7~~$9.4 million for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2018, which was an increase of approximately ~~$0.9~~$0.8 million, or ~~10.7%~~7.8%. The majority of the increase is related to a $0.9 million, or ~~12.1%~~10.6%, increase in property ~~taxes.~~taxes due to higher assessments of value by taxing authorities.

Property management fees. Property management fees were ~~$2.3~~$2.2 million for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 compared to $2.1 million for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2018, which was an increase of approximately ~~$0.2~~$0.1 million, or ~~7.2%~~4.4%. The majority of the increase is related to a ~~$3.8~~$2.7 million, or ~~6.2%~~4.4%, increase in rental income, and a ~~$1.2~~$0.4 million, or ~~13.5%~~4.0%, increase in other income, which the fee is primarily based on.

Property general and administrative expenses. Property general and administrative expenses ~~were $2.7~~remained flat at $2.4 million for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 compared to ~~$2.6~~$2.4 million for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, 2016, which was an increase of approximately $0.1 million, or 3.0%. The majority of the increase primarily related to a $0.2 million, or 21.6%, increase in advertising and promotional costs, partially offset by a $0.1 million, or 2.4%, decrease in other administrative costs.2018.

NOI and Same Store NOI for the Three and ~~Nine~~Six Months Ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 and ~~2016~~2018

The following table, which has not been adjusted for the effects of noncontrolling interests, reconciles our NOI and our Same Store NOI for the three and ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 and ~~2016~~2018 to net income (loss), the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure (in thousands):

		For the Three Months Ended September 30,						For the Nine Months Ended September 30,							For the Six Months Ended June 30,						For the Three Months Ended June 30,
		2017			2016			2017			2016				2019			2018			2019			2018
Net income		$	54,076		$	8,825		$	60,702		$	25,712
Adjustments to reconcile net income to NOI:
Net income (loss)															$	(6,360	)	$	8,428	��	$	(1,987	)	$	(1,666	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to NOI:
Advisory and administrative fees			1,870			1,698			5,544			4,944				3,722			3,701			1,872			1,863
Corporate general and administrative expenses			1,623			1,023			4,842			2,649				4,974			3,799			2,741			1,986
Casualty-related expenses/(recoveries)	(1)		(381	)		3			(351	)		91
Casualty-related recoveries														(1)		(7	)		(666	)		(43	)		(690	)
Property general and administrative expenses	(2)		427			346			904			627		(2)		696			786			339			406
Depreciation and amortization			11,215			8,667			35,866			26,363				28,464			22,410			13,066			11,038
Interest expense			8,257			4,791			22,479			15,650				16,678			13,620			8,590			6,823
Loss on extinguishment of debt and modification costs			914			888			5,717			1,722				—			629			—			78
Gain on sales of real estate			(58,490	)		(9,562	)		(78,386	)		(25,932	)			—			(13,742	)		—			—
Acquisition costs			—			386			—			386
NOI		$	19,511		$	17,065		$	57,317		$	52,212			$	48,167		$	38,965		$	24,578		$	19,838
Less Non-Same Store
Revenues			(11,315	)		(9,011	)		(33,590	)		(29,544	)			(11,017	)		(232	)		(6,004	)		(13	)
Operating expenses			5,562			4,533			16,776			14,866				4,103			125			2,263			(51	)
Same Store NOI		$	13,758		$	12,587		$	40,503		$	37,534			$	41,253		$	38,858		$	20,837		$	19,774

We believe that net income, as defined by GAAP, is the most appropriate earnings measure. We also believe that funds from operations ~~or FFO,~~(“FFO”), as defined by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts ~~or NAREIT,~~(“NAREIT”), core funds from operations or (“Core ~~FFO,~~FFO”) and adjusted funds from operations ~~or AFFO,~~(“AFFO”) are important non-GAAP supplemental measures of operating performance for a REIT.

Since the historical cost accounting convention used for real estate assets requires depreciation except on land, such accounting presentation implies that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time. However, since real estate values have historically risen or fallen with market and other conditions, presentations of operating results for a REIT that use historical cost accounting for depreciation could be less informative. Thus, NAREIT created FFO as a supplemental measure of operating performance for REITs that excludes historical cost depreciation and amortization, among other items, from net income, as defined by GAAP. FFO is defined by NAREIT as net income computed in accordance with GAAP, excluding gains or losses from real estate dispositions, plus real estate depreciation and amortization and impairment charges. We compute FFO attributable to common stockholders in accordance with NAREIT’s definition. Our presentation differs slightly in that we begin with net income (loss) before adjusting for amounts attributable to (1) noncontrolling interests in consolidated joint ventures and (2) redeemable noncontrolling interests in the ~~OP;~~OP and we show the combined amounts attributable to such noncontrolling interests as an adjustment to arrive at FFO attributable to common stockholders.

Core FFO makes certain adjustments to FFO, which are either not likely to occur on a regular basis or are otherwise not representative of the ongoing operating performance of our portfolio. Core FFO adjusts FFO to remove items such as acquisition expenses, losses on extinguishment of debt and modification costs ~~(includes~~(including prepayment penalties and defeasance costs incurred ~~and~~on the early repayment of debt, the write-off of unamortized deferred ~~loan~~financing costs and fair market value adjustments of assumed debt related to the early ~~retirement~~repayment of debt, ~~and~~ costs incurred in ~~connection with~~ a debt modification that are ~~expensed)~~not capitalized as deferred financing costs and other costs incurred in a debt extinguishment), casualty-related expenses and recoveries, the amortization of deferred financing costs incurred in connection with obtaining short-term debt financing, the ineffective portion of fair value adjustments on ~~our~~ interest rate derivatives designated as cash flow hedges (see Notes 2 and 7 to our consolidated financial statements), and the noncontrolling interests (as described above) related to these items. We believe Core FFO is useful to investors as a supplemental gauge of our operating performance and is useful in comparing our operating performance with other REITs that are not as involved in the aforementioned activities.

AFFO makes certain adjustments to Core FFO in order to arrive at a more refined measure of the operating performance of our ~~portfolio.~~Portfolio. There is no industry standard definition of AFFO and practice is divergent across the industry. AFFO adjusts Core FFO to remove items such as equity-based compensation expense and the amortization of deferred financing costs incurred in connection with obtaining long-term debt financing, and the noncontrolling interests (as described above) related to these items. We believe AFFO is useful to investors as a supplemental gauge of our operating performance and is useful in comparing our operating performance with other REITs that are not as involved in the aforementioned activities.

The effect of the conversion of OP Units held by noncontrolling limited partners is not reflected in the computation of basic and diluted FFO, Core FFO and AFFO per share, as they are exchangeable for common stock on a one-for-one basis. The FFO, Core FFO and AFFO allocable to such units is allocated on this same basis and reflected in the adjustments for noncontrolling interests in the table below. As such, the assumed conversion of these units would have no net impact on the determination of diluted FFO, Core FFO and AFFO per share. See Note 9 to our consolidated financial statements for additional information.

We believe that the use of FFO, Core FFO and AFFO, combined with the required GAAP presentations, improves the understanding of operating results of REITs among investors and makes comparisons of operating results among such companies more meaningful. While FFO, Core FFO and AFFO are relevant and widely used measures of operating performance of REITs, they do not represent cash flows from operations or net income (loss) as defined by GAAP and should not be considered as an alternative or substitute to those measures in evaluating our liquidity or operating performance. FFO, Core FFO and AFFO do not purport to be indicative of cash available to fund our future cash requirements. Further, our computation of FFO, Core FFO and AFFO may not be comparable to FFO, Core FFO and AFFO reported by other REITs that do not define FFO in accordance with the current NAREIT definition or that interpret the current NAREIT definition or define Core FFO or AFFO differently than we do.

The following table reconciles our calculations of FFO, Core FFO and AFFO to net income (loss), the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure, for the three and ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 and ~~2016~~2018 (in thousands, except per share amounts):

	For the Three Months Ended September 30,						For the Nine Months Ended September 30,							For the Three Months Ended June 30,							For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2017			2016			2017			2016				2019			2018				2019			2018			% Change (1)
Net income	$	54,076		$	8,825		$	60,702		$	25,712
Net income (loss)														$	(1,987	)	$	(1,666	)		$	(6,360	)	$	8,428			-175.5	%
Depreciation and amortization		11,215			8,667			35,866			26,363				13,066			11,038				28,464			22,410			27.0	%
Gain on sales of real estate		(58,490	)		(9,562	)		(78,386	)		(25,932	)			—			—				—			(13,742	)		-100.0	%
Adjustment for noncontrolling interests		(21	)		(1,021	)		(1,670	)		(3,401	)			(33	)		(28	)			(66	)		(51	)		29.4	%
FFO attributable to common stockholders		6,780			6,909			16,512			22,742				11,046			9,344				22,038			17,045			29.3	%

FFO per share - basic	$	0.32		$	0.32		$	0.78		$	1.07			$	0.47		$	0.45			$	0.93		$	0.82			14.2	%
FFO per share - diluted	$	0.32		$	0.32		$	0.77		$	1.07			$	0.46		$	0.44			$	0.91		$	0.80			14.4	%

Acquisition costs		—			386			—			386
Loss on extinguishment of debt and modification costs		914			888			5,717			1,722				—			78				—			629			-100.0	%
Change in fair value on derivative instruments - ineffective portion		(32	)		(599	)		(97	)		(599	)
Casualty-related recoveries															(43	)		(690	)			(7	)		(666	)		-98.9	%
Amortization of deferred financing costs - acquisition term notes		197			—			323			—				—			—				—			21			-100.0	%
Adjustment for noncontrolling interests		(4	)		(104	)		(430	)		(188	)			—			2				—			—		N/A
Core FFO attributable to common stockholders		7,855			7,480			22,025			24,063				11,003			8,734				22,031			17,029			29.4	%

Core FFO per share - basic	$	0.37		$	0.35		$	1.05		$	1.13			$	0.46		$	0.42			$	0.93		$	0.82			14.3	%
Core FFO per share - diluted	$	0.37		$	0.35		$	1.03		$	1.13			$	0.45		$	0.41			$	0.91		$	0.80			14.5	%

Amortization of deferred financing costs - long term debt		375			385			1,225			1,084				470			352				902			720			25.3	%
Equity-based compensation expense		822			296			2,414			296				1,419			1,094				2,654			2,009			32.1	%
Adjustment for noncontrolling interests		(3	)		(38	)		(72	)		(93	)			(5	)		(4	)			(11	)		(8	)		37.5	%
AFFO attributable to common stockholders		9,049			8,123			25,592			25,350				12,887			10,176				25,576			19,750			29.5	%

AFFO per share - basic	$	0.43		$	0.38		$	1.22		$	1.19			$	0.54		$	0.49			$	1.08		$	0.95			14.4	%
AFFO per share - diluted	$	0.42		$	0.38		$	1.20		$	1.19			$	0.53		$	0.48			$	1.06		$	0.92			14.6	%

Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic		21,085			21,260			21,057			21,282				23,736			20,780				23,643			20,883			13.2	%
Weighted average common shares outstanding - diluted		21,453			21,376			21,407			21,322				24,233			21,295				24,139			21,362			13.0	%

Dividends declared per common share	$	0.220		$	0.206		$	0.660		$	0.618			$	0.275		$	0.250			$	0.550		$	0.500			10.0	%

FFO Coverage - diluted	1.44x			1.57x			1.17x			1.73x			(2)	1.66x			1.76x			(2)	1.66x			1.60x				4.02	%
Core FFO Coverage - diluted	1.66x			1.7x			1.56x			1.83x			(2)	1.65x			1.64x			(2)	1.66x			1.59x				4.08	%
AFFO Coverage - diluted	1.92x			1.84x			1.81x			1.92x			(2)	1.93x			1.91x			(2)	1.93x			1.85x				4.18	%

The three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 as compared to the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2018

FFO was ~~$6.8~~$11.0 million for the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 compared to ~~$6.9~~$9.3 million for the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2018, which was ~~a decrease~~an increase of approximately ~~$0.1~~$1.7 million. The change in our FFO between the periods primarily relates to ~~increases~~an increase in total ~~property operating expenses~~revenues of ~~approximately $0.9 million, interest expense of approximately $3.5 million and corporate general and administrative expenses of approximately $0.6 million, and~~$7.4 million. This was partially offset by an increase in ~~total revenues~~property operating expenses of ~~approximately $4.0~~$3.3 million, an increase in advisory and administrative fees of $0.2 million, an increase in interest expense of $1.8 million, an increase in corporate general and administrative expenses of $0.8 million and adjustments for amounts attributable to noncontrolling interests.

Core FFO was ~~$7.9~~$11.0 million for the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 compared to ~~$7.5~~$8.7 million for the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2018, which was an increase of approximately ~~$0.4~~$2.3 million. The change in our Core FFO between the periods primarily

relates to an increase in FFO and a decrease in ~~gain recognized related to the ineffective portion~~casualty-related losses of ~~changes in fair value of our interest rate swap derivatives designated as cash flow hedges of approximately~~ $0.6 million, partially offset by ~~decreases in acquisition costs of approximately $0.4 million and FFO.~~

AFFO was $9.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017 compared to $8.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2016, which was an increase of approximately $0.9 million. The change in our AFFO between periods primarily relates to increases in equity-based compensation expense of approximately $0.5 million and Core FFO.

~~The nine months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2016~~

~~FFO was $16.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to $22.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016, which was~~ a decrease ~~of approximately $6.2 million. The change~~ in ~~our FFO between periods primarily relates to increases in total property operating expenses of approximately $3.4 million, interest expense of approximately $6.8 million,~~ loss on extinguishment of debt and modification costs of ~~approximately $4.0~~$0.1 million and adjustments for amounts attributable to noncontrolling interests.

AFFO was $12.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2019 compared to $10.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2018, which was an increase of approximately $2.7 million. The change in our AFFO between the periods primarily relates to increases in Core FFO and an increase in equity-based compensation expense of $0.3 million.

The six months ended June 30, 2019 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2018

FFO was $22.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2019 compared to $17.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018, which was an increase of approximately $5.0 million. The change in our FFO between the periods primarily relates to an increase in total revenues of $13.8 million, partially offset by increases in total property operating expenses of $5.2 million, interest expense of $3.1 million, corporate general and administrative expenses of ~~approximately $2.2 million, and was partially offset by an increase in total revenues of approximately $9.1~~$1.2 million, and adjustments for amounts attributable to noncontrolling interests.

Core FFO was $22.0 million for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 compared to ~~$24.1~~$17.0 million for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2018, which was ~~a decrease~~an increase of approximately ~~$2.1~~$5.0 million. The change in our Core FFO between the periods primarily relates to ~~decreases~~an increase in ~~gain recognized related to the ineffective portion~~FFO and a decrease in casualty-related losses of ~~changes in fair value of our interest rate swap derivatives designated as cash flow hedges of approximately $0.5 million and FFO,~~$0.6 million. These were partially offset by a ~~$4.0 million increase~~decrease in loss on extinguishment of debt and modification costs of $0.6 million and adjustments for amounts attributable to noncontrolling interests.

AFFO was $25.6 million for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 compared to ~~$25.4~~$19.8 million for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2018, which was an increase of approximately ~~$0.2~~$5.8 million. The change in our AFFO between the periods primarily relates to ~~an increase~~increases in Core FFO and equity-based compensation expense of ~~approximately $2.1 million, partially offset by a decrease in Core FFO.~~$0.6 million.

Our short-term liquidity requirements consist primarily of funds necessary to pay for debt maturities, operating expenses and other expenditures directly associated with our multifamily properties, including:

We expect to meet our short-term liquidity requirements generally through net cash provided by operations and existing cash ~~balances. We intend~~balances and unused capacity on ~~paying~~ the ~~outstanding principal balance of the 2017 Bridge Facility with proceeds from the sales of properties classified as held for sale as of September 30, 2017 or cash on hand.~~Corporate Credit Facility. As of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2019, we had approximately ~~$6.3~~$6.2 million of renovation value-add reserves for our planned capital expenditures to implement our value-add program. Renovation value-add reserves are not required to be held in escrow by a third party. We may reallocate these funds, at our discretion, to pursue other investment opportunities or meet our short-term liquidity requirements. Additionally, we had $72.5 million of unused capacity on the Corporate Credit Facility as of June 30, 2019.

Our long-term liquidity requirements consist primarily of funds necessary to pay for the costs of acquiring additional multifamily properties, renovations and other capital expenditures to improve our multifamily properties and scheduled debt payments and distributions. We expect to meet our long-term liquidity requirements through various sources of capital, which may include a revolving credit facility and future debt or equity issuances, existing working capital, net cash provided by operations, long-term mortgage indebtedness and other secured and unsecured borrowings, and property dispositions. However, there are a number of

factors that may have a material adverse effect on our ability to access these capital sources, including the state of overall equity and credit markets, our degree of leverage, our unencumbered asset base and borrowing restrictions imposed by lenders (including as a result of any failure to comply with financial covenants in our existing and future indebtedness), general market conditions for REITs, our operating performance and liquidity, market perceptions about us and restrictions on sales of properties under the Code. The success of our business strategy will depend, in part, on our ability to access these various capital sources.

In addition to our value-add program, our multifamily properties will require periodic capital expenditures and renovation to remain competitive. Also, acquisitions, redevelopments, or expansions of our multifamily properties will require significant capital outlays. Long-term, we may not be able to fund such capital improvements solely from net cash provided by operations because we must distribute annually at least 90% of our REIT taxable income, determined without regard to the deductions for dividends paid and excluding net capital gains, to qualify and maintain our qualification as a REIT, and we are subject to tax on any retained income and gains. As a result, our ability to fund capital expenditures, acquisitions, or redevelopment through retained earnings long-term is limited. Consequently, we expect to rely heavily upon the availability of debt or equity capital for these purposes. If we are unable to obtain the necessary capital on favorable terms, or at all, our financial condition, liquidity, results of operations, and prospects could be materially and adversely affected.

On February 20, 2019, the Company, the OP and the Adviser entered into separate Equity Distribution Agreements with each of Jefferies, Raymond James and SunTrust, pursuant to which the Company may issue and sell from time to time shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.01 per share, having an aggregate sales price of up to $100,000,000. In addition to the issuance and sale of shares of common stock, the Company may enter into forward sale agreements with each of Jefferies and Raymond James, or their respective affiliates, through the ATM Program. During the three months ended June 30, 2019, the Company issued 252,165 shares of common stock at an average price of $40.26 per share, for net proceeds of approximately $9.4 million. The Company paid approximately $0.2 million in fees to the Sales Agents with respect to such sales and incurred other issuance costs of approximately $0.5 million, both of which were netted against the gross proceeds and recorded in additional paid in capital. The ATM Program may be terminated by the Company at any time and expires automatically once aggregate sales under the ATM Program reach $100,000,000.

We believe that our available cash, expected operating cash flows, and potential debt or equity financings will provide sufficient funds for our operations, anticipated scheduled debt service payments and dividend requirements for the twelve-month period following ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017.~~2019.

The following table presents selected data from our consolidated statements of cash flows for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 and ~~2016~~2018 (in thousands):

Cash flows from operating activities. During the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2019, net cash provided by operating activities was ~~$27.5~~$23.6 million compared to net cash provided by operating activities of ~~$26.3~~$17.3 million for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016.~~2018. The change in cash flows from operating activities was mainly due to an increase in total revenues and net cash received on derivative settlements and changes in operating assets and ~~liabilities and~~liabilities. These were partially offset by an increase in ~~NOI, partially offset by increases in interest on debt, prepayment penalties and debt modification expenses paid.~~property operating expenses.

Cash flows from investing activities. During the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2019, net cash ~~provided by~~used in investing activities was ~~$67.6~~$152.3 million compared to net cash provided by investing activities of ~~$105.9~~$14.4 million for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016.~~2018. The change in cash flows from investing activities was mainly due to the acquisition of ~~two~~four properties for a combined purchase price of approximately ~~$138.0~~$151.5 million during the period in ~~2017,~~2019 compared to ~~the acquisition of one property for a purchase price of approximately $22.4 million~~no acquisitions during the period in ~~2016.~~2018. The change in cash flows from investing activities was partially offset by ~~an increase~~a decrease in net proceeds from sales of real ~~estate;~~estate. We had no sales during the six months ended June 30, 2019, and we sold ~~nine properties~~one property for net proceeds of approximately ~~$224.4~~$29.6 million during the period in ~~2017, compared to selling seven properties for net proceeds of approximately $131.8 million during the period in 2016.~~2018.

Cash flows from financing activities. During the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2019, net cash ~~used in~~provided by financing activities was ~~$28.3~~$125.1 million compared to net cash used in financing activities of ~~$127.0~~$35.8 million for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016.~~2018. The change in cash flows from financing activities was mainly due to a net increase in debt ~~proceeds~~ of approximately ~~$146.5~~$146.3 million, a decrease in common stock repurchases of approximately $9.5 million, and an increase in proceeds from the issuance of common stock through the ATM Program of approximately $9.4 million (net of Sales Agents fees and other legal fees) between the periods. These were partially offset by ~~the $51.7 million purchase amount of the BH Buyout during the period in 2017. The proceeds from the net~~an increase in ~~debt proceeds during the period in 2017 were primarily used to acquire two properties for a combined purchase price~~common stock dividends paid of approximately ~~$138.0~~$2.8 million and ~~fund a portion~~an increase in deferred financing costs paid of approximately $1.5 million between the ~~BH Buyout.~~periods.

As of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2019, our subsidiaries had aggregate mortgage debt outstanding to third parties of approximately ~~$733.3~~$934.3 million at a weighted average interest rate of ~~3.04%~~3.94% and an adjusted weighted average interest rate of ~~3.14%~~3.16%. For purposes of calculating the adjusted weighted average interest rate of our mortgage debt outstanding, we have included the weighted average fixed rate of ~~1.3388%~~1.4272% for one-month LIBOR on our combined ~~$650.0~~$750.0 million notional amount of interest rate swap agreements, which effectively ~~fix~~fixes the interest rate on ~~$650.0~~$750.0 million of our floating rate mortgage debt. See Notes 6 and 7 to our consolidated financial statements for additional information.

We have entered into and expect to continue to enter into interest rate swap and cap agreements with various third parties to fix or cap the floating interest rates on a majority of our floating rate mortgage debt outstanding. The interest rate swap agreements generally have a term of four to five years and effectively establish a fixed interest rate on debt on the underlying notional amounts. The interest rate swap agreements involve the receipt of variable-rate amounts from a counterparty in exchange for us making fixed-rate payments over the life of the agreements without exchange of the underlying notional amount. As of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2019, interest rate swap agreements effectively covered ~~$650.0~~$750.0 million, or ~~96%~~84%, of our ~~$673.7~~$897.0 million of floating rate mortgage debt outstanding.

The interest rate cap agreements generally have a term of three to four years, ~~and~~ cover the outstanding principal amount of the underlying ~~debt.~~debt and are generally required by our lenders. Under the interest rate cap agreements, we pay a fixed fee in exchange for the counterparty to pay any interest above a maximum rate. As of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2019, interest rate cap agreements covered ~~$293.2~~$320.1 million of our ~~$673.7~~$897.0 million of floating rate mortgage debt outstanding. These interest rate cap agreements effectively cap one-month LIBOR on ~~$293.2~~$320.1 million of our floating rate mortgage debt at a weighted average rate of ~~4.20%~~5.82%.

On June 30, 2017, we entered into 22 first mortgages, with a combined principal amount of $502.1 million, on certain of our properties, replacing the $168.4 million of existing mortgage debt outstanding on nine properties and the $300.0 million outstanding under a credit facility (the “$300 Million Credit Facility”). The refinancing of the existing mortgage debt incurred approximately $1.7 million of prepayment penalties, which is included in loss on extinguishment of debt and modification costs on the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income. The Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (“Freddie Mac”), who was the lender on the existing mortgage debt and the $300 Million Credit Facility, also originated the 22 new first mortgages (the “Freddie Refinance”). In accordance with FASB ASC 470-50, ~~Debt – Modifications and Extinguishments~~, we accounted for the refinancing as a modification of a debt instrument. As such, the existing $4.9 million of net deferred financing costs related to the prior mortgage debt and credit facility debt is included with the approximately $4.5 million of deferred financing costs incurred in connection with the modification. Such costs are recorded as a reduction from mortgages payable on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2017 and are amortized over the terms of the new mortgage debt. Additionally, we incurred approximately $2.0 million of debt modification costs in connection with the Freddie Refinance that were not capitalized as deferred financing costs. Such costs are recorded in loss on extinguishment of debt and modification costs on the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income. We used approximately $16.3 million of proceeds from the Freddie Refinance to fund a portion of the BH Buyout.

~~For additional information regarding the Freddie Refinance and the BH Buyout, see Notes 6 and 10 to our consolidated financial statements.~~

We intend to invest in additional multifamily properties as suitable opportunities arise and adequate sources of equity and debt financing are available. We expect that future investments in properties, including any improvements or renovations of current or newly acquired properties, will depend on and will be financed by, in whole or in part, our existing cash, future borrowings and the proceeds from additional issuances of common stock or other securities or property dispositions. In addition, we may seek financing from U.S. government agencies, including through Freddie Mac, the Federal National Mortgage Association, and the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, in appropriate circumstances in connection with the acquisition or refinancing of existing mortgage loans.

Although we expect to be subject to restrictions on our ability to incur indebtedness, we expect that we will be able to refinance existing indebtedness or incur additional indebtedness for acquisitions or other purposes, if needed. However, there can be no

assurance that we will be able to refinance our indebtedness, incur additional indebtedness or access additional sources of capital, such as by issuing common stock or other debt or equity securities, on terms that are acceptable to us or at all.

Furthermore, following the completion of our value-add and capital expenditures programs and depending on the interest rate environment at the applicable time, we may seek to refinance our floating rate debt into longer-term fixed rate debt at lower leverage levels.

On ~~June 30, 2017,~~January 28, 2019, we, through ~~our~~the OP, entered into a ~~$65.9~~$75.0 million ~~bridge~~credit facility (the ~~“2017 Bridge~~“Corporate Credit Facility”) with ~~KeyBank. We~~SunTrust Bank, as administrative agent and the lenders party thereto, and immediately drew ~~$44.5~~$52.5 million to fund a portion of the purchase price of Rockledge Apartments and $21.4 million to fund a portion of the BH Buyout. In July 2017, we used proceeds from the sale of Regatta Bay to pay down $11.3 million on the 2017 Bridge Facility. The 2017 Bridge Facility is a full-term, interest-only facility with an initial four-month term (see below). The 2017 Bridge Facility is guaranteed by us. Interest accrues on the 2017 Bridge Facility at an interest rate of one-month LIBOR plus 3.75%. We intend on paying the outstanding principal balance of the 2017 Bridge Facility with proceeds from the sales of properties classified as held for sale as of ~~September~~ ~~30, 2017 or cash on hand. See Notes 5, 6 and 10 to our consolidated financial statements for additional information.~~

In October 2017, we used proceeds from the sale of The Arbors, The Crossings, The Crossings at Holcomb Bridge and The Knolls to pay down $46.0 million on the 2017 Bridge Facility, bringing the outstanding principal balance to approximately $8.6 million as of October 31, 2017, and also extended the maturity date to March 31, 2018 (see Note 13 to our consolidated financial statements).

On December 29, 2016, we, through our OP, entered into a $30.0 million credit facility (the “$30 Million Credit Facility”) and immediately drew $15.0 million to fund a portion of the purchase price of Old Farm and Stone Creek at Old Farm. On February 1, 2017, we drew $14.0 million and used $12.0 million to fund a portion of the purchase price of Hollister Place and $2.0 million to fund value-add renovations at our properties. In April 2017, we used cash on hand plus our share of the proceeds, net of distributions to noncontrolling interests, from fourthree properties we ~~sold to pay down $10.0 million~~acquired on ~~the $30 Million Credit Facility. On June 30, 2017, we drew $11.0 million to fund a portion of the BH Buyout.~~January 28, 2019. The ~~$30 Million~~Corporate Credit Facility is a full-term, interest-only facility with an initial 24-month term, ~~of 24 months and~~has one 12-month extension option, and we have the right to request an increase in the facility amount up to $140 million (the “Accordion Feature”). The facility bears interest at a rate of one-month LIBOR plus a range from 2.00% to 2.50%, depending on our leverage level as determined under the credit facility agreement, and is guaranteed by us. On June 29, 2019, we, through the OP, exercised our ~~OP. See Notes 5, 6~~option under the Accordion Feature of the Corporate Credit Facility and 10increased the amount of the facility from $75 million to ~~our consolidated financial statements for~~$125 million. In conjunction with the increase in the facility, we incurred costs of $0.5 million in obtaining the additional ~~information.~~

financing through the Accordion Feature. As of ~~September~~ ~~30, 2017, we had $30.0 million outstanding under our $30 Million Credit Facility.~~

On June 6, 2016, we, through certain of our subsidiaries, entered into a $200.0 million credit facility, which was expanded to $300.0 million (the “$300 Million Credit Facility”) during the fourth quarter of 2016 to acquire three properties. The $300 Million Credit Facility was cross-collateralized by the following 12 properties: Arbors on Forest Ridge, Cutter’s Point, Eagle Crest, Silverbrook, Timberglen, Edgewater at Sandy Springs, Beechwood Terrace, Willow Grove, Woodbridge, Venue at 8651, Old Farm and Stone Creek at Old Farm.

On June 30, ~~2017, in connection with~~2019, at our current leverage level, the ~~Freddie Refinance, we repaid and retired~~spread over the ~~$300 Million Credit Facility. The refinancing of this existing credit facility debt did not incur prepayment penalties.~~reference rate is 2.25%. See Note 6 to our consolidated financial statements for additional information.

On December 29, 2016, we, through our OP, entered into a $30.0 million bridge facility (the “2016 Bridge Facility”) with KeyBank and drew $30.0 million to fund a portion of the purchase price of Old Farm and Stone Creek at Old Farm. In April 2017, we paid down the entire $30.0 million of principal on the 2016 Bridge Facility, which was funded with our share of the proceeds, net of distributions to noncontrolling interests, from properties we sold in April 2017. The 2016 Bridge Facility was retired on April 28, 2017. See Notes 5 and 6 to our consolidated financial statements for additional information.

amount of ~~$650.0~~$750.0 million. As of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2019, the interest rate swaps we have entered into effectively replace the floating interest rate (one-month LIBOR) with respect to ~~$650.0~~$750.0 million of our floating rate mortgage debt outstanding with a weighted average fixed rate of ~~1.3388%~~1.4272%. During the term of these interest rate swap agreements, we are required to make monthly fixed rate payments of ~~1.3388%~~1.4272%, on a weighted average basis, on the notional amounts, while the ~~Counterparty is~~Counterparties are obligated to make monthly floating rate payments based on one-month LIBOR to us referencing the same notional amounts. WeFor purposes of hedge accounting under FASB ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging, we have designated these interest rate swaps as cash flow hedges of interest rate risk. See Notes 6 and 7 to our consolidated financial statements for additional information.

The following table contains summary information regarding our outstanding interest rate swaps (dollars in thousands):

Effective Date	Termination Date	Notional		Fixed Rate				Floating Rate Option (1)	Termination Date	Counterparty	Notional		Fixed Rate (1)
July 1, 2016	June 1, 2021	$	100,000		1.1055	%		One-month LIBOR	June 1, 2021	KeyBank	$	100,000		1.1055	%
July 1, 2016	June 1, 2021		100,000		1.0210	%		One-month LIBOR	June 1, 2021	KeyBank		100,000		1.0210	%
July 1, 2016	June 1, 2021		100,000		0.9000	%		One-month LIBOR	June 1, 2021	KeyBank		100,000		0.9000	%
September 1, 2016	June 1, 2021		100,000		0.9560	%		One-month LIBOR	June 1, 2021	KeyBank		100,000		0.9560	%
April 1, 2017	April 1, 2022		100,000		1.9570	%		One-month LIBOR	April 1, 2022	KeyBank		100,000		1.9570	%
May 1, 2017	April 1, 2022		50,000		1.9610	%		One-month LIBOR	April 1, 2022	KeyBank		50,000		1.9610	%
July 1, 2017	July 1, 2022		100,000		1.7820	%		One-month LIBOR	July 1, 2022	KeyBank		100,000		1.7820	%
June 1, 2019									June 1, 2024	KeyBank		50,000		2.0020	%
June 1, 2019									June 1, 2024	SunTrust		50,000		2.0020	%
		$	650,000		1.3388	%	(2)				$	750,000		1.4272	%	(2)

The following table summarizes our contractual obligations and commitments as of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 for the next five calendar years subsequent to ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017.~~2019. We used one-month LIBOR as of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 to calculate interest expense due by period on our floating rate debt and net interest expense due by period on our interest rate swaps.

		Payments Due by Period (in thousands)															Payments Due by Period (in thousands)
		Total		2017		2018		2019		2020		2021		Thereafter			Total		2019		2020		2021		2022		2023		Thereafter
Operating Properties Mortgage Debt
Principal payments		$	702,474	$	396	$	13,352	$	2,448	$	2,483	$	2,531	$	681,264		$	776,184	$	360	$	744	$	782	$	817	$	20,598	$	752,883
Interest expense	(1)		144,459		5,622		22,080		21,647		21,616		22,025		51,469	(1)		151,695		11,846		23,559		26,776		29,912		29,631		29,971
Total		$	846,933	$	6,018	$	35,432	$	24,095	$	24,099	$	24,556	$	732,733		$	927,879	$	12,206	$	24,303	$	27,558	$	30,729	$	50,229	$	782,854

Held For Sale Properties Mortgage Debt
Held For Sale Property Mortgage Debt
Principal payments		$	30,826	$	—	$	276	$	309	$	316	$	326	$	29,599		$	158,161	$	116	$	263	$	282	$	12,620	$	—	$	144,880
Interest expense			5,549		253		1,000		989		981		968		1,358			32,020		3,243		6,442		6,412		5,829		5,829		4,265
Total		$	36,375	$	253	$	1,276	$	1,298	$	1,297	$	1,294	$	30,957		$	190,181	$	3,359	$	6,705	$	6,694	$	18,449	$	5,829	$	149,145

Credit Facility & Bridge Facility
Credit Facility
Principal payments		$	84,597	$	54,597	$	30,000	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—		$	52,500	$	—	$	—	$	52,500	$	—	$	—	$	—
Interest expense			2,184		627		1,557		—		—		—		—			3,702		1,181		2,348		173		—		—		—
Total		$	86,781	$	55,224	$	31,557	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—		$	56,202	$	1,181	$	2,348	$	52,673	$	—	$	—	$	—

Total contractual obligations and commitments		$	970,089	$	61,495	$	68,265	$	25,393	$	25,396	$	25,850	$	763,690		$	1,174,262	$	16,746	$	33,356	$	86,925	$	49,178	$	56,058	$	931,999

We anticipate incurring average annual repairs and maintenance expense of ~~$575-$725~~$575 to $725 per apartment unit in connection with the ongoing operations of our business. These expenditures are expensed as incurred. In addition, we reserve, on average, approximately $250 to $350 per apartment unit for non-recurring capital expenditures and/or lender required replacement reserves. When incurred, these expenditures are either capitalized or expensed, in accordance with GAAP, depending on the type of the expenditure. Although we will continuously monitor the adequacy of this average, we believe these figures to be sufficient to maintain the properties at a high level in the markets in which we operate. A majority of the properties in our Portfolio were underwritten and acquired with the premise that we would invest ~~$4,000-$10,000~~$4,000 to $10,000 per unit in the first 36 months of ownership, in an effort to add value to the asset’s exterior and interiors. In ~~most~~many cases, we ~~reserved~~reserve cash at the closing of each acquisition to fund these planned capital expenditures and value-add improvements. As of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2019, we had approximately ~~$6.3~~$6.2 million of renovation value-add reserves for our planned capital expenditures and other expenses to implement our value-add program, which will complete approximately ~~1,000~~1,200 planned interior rehabs. The following table sets forth a summary of our capital expenditures related to our value-add program for the three and ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 and ~~2016~~2018 (in thousands):

		For the Three Months Ended September 30,				For the Nine Months Ended September 30,					For the Three Months Ended June 30,				For the Six Months Ended June 30,
Rehab Expenditures		2017		2016		2017		2016			2019		2018		2019		2018
Interior	(1)	$	1,883	$	2,439	$	6,647	$	7,136	(1)	$	2,973	$	2,040	$	5,461	$	3,556
Exterior and common area			1,166		1,746		5,067		8,078			3,352		2,543		5,137		4,992
Total rehab expenditures		$	3,049	$	4,185	$	11,714	$	15,214		$	6,325	$	4,583	$	10,598	$	8,548

In order to obtain more favorable pricing on our mortgage debt financing with Freddie Mac, we have decided to participate in Freddie Mac’s new Multifamily Green Advantage ~~program. We have~~program (the “Green Program”). In the second quarter of 2017, we escrowed approximately $4.2 million to finance smarter, greener property improvements at 2018 of our ~~properties, which will be~~properties. In connection with the three acquisitions and seven refinancings we completed byin 2018, we escrowed approximately $1.2 million related to the ~~summer~~Green Program. In connection with the four purchases in 2019, the Company escrowed approximately $0.6 million related to the Green Program. Since the inception of the Green Program through June 30, 2019, we had spent approximately $4.2 million on green improvements and completed 23 Green Programs. We expect to spend approximately $2.7 million on green improvements during the fiscal year 2019. We ~~plan~~expect to reduce water/sewer costs at each property where the Green Program is implemented by at least 15% through the replacement of showerheads, plumbing fixtures and toilets with modern energy efficient upgrades. ~~By participating~~For the six months ended June 30, 2019, utility costs for our YTD Same Store properties decreased by approximately $0.7 million or 15.5% compared to the six months ended June 30, 2018. For the three months ended June 30, 2019, utility costs for our Q2 Same Store properties decreased by approximately $0.2 million or 10.2% compared to the three months ended June 30, 2018. In 2018, for the 17 properties where the Green Program was completed, this resulted in ~~this program, we were able to lower the interest rate on the properties we refinanced in the Freddie Refinance by 10 basis points.~~an estimated reduction of utility costs of approximately $1.4 million.

Section 107 of the JOBS Act provides that an emerging growth company can take advantage of the extended transition period provided in Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act, for complying with new or revised accounting standards applicable to public companies. In other words, an emerging growth company can delay the adoption of certain accounting standards until those standards would otherwise apply to private companies. We have elected to take advantage of this extended transition period. As a result of this election, our financial statements may not be comparable to companies that comply with public company effective dates for such new or revised standards. We may elect to comply with public company effective dates at any time, and such election would be irrevocable pursuant to Section 107(b) of the JOBS Act.

We could remain an “emerging growth company” until the earliest of (1) the last day of the fiscal year following the fifth anniversary of becoming a public company, (2) the last day of the first fiscal year in which we have total annual gross revenue of $1.07 billion or more, (3) the date on which we are deemed to be a “large accelerated filer” as defined in Rule 12b-2 under the Exchange Act (which would occur if the market value of our common stock held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million, measured as of the last business day of our most recently completed second fiscal quarter, and we have been publicly reporting for at least 12 months) or (4) the date on which we have, during the preceding three year period, issued more than $1.0 billion in non-convertible debt. As of June 30, 2019, the market value of our common stock held by non-affiliates exceeded $700 million, and as such, we will no longer be an emerging growth company after December 31, 2019 and will have to adopt all accounting standards as required for

public companies without the use of the extended transition period. Further, an audit of internal controls over financial reporting will be required for the year ended December 31, 2019.

We anticipate that we will continue to qualify to be taxed as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes, and we intend to continue to be organized and to operate in a manner that will permit us to qualify as a REIT. To qualify as a REIT, we must meet certain organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement to distribute at least 90% of our annual REIT taxable income to stockholders. As a REIT, we will be subject to federal income tax on our undistributed REIT taxable income and net capital gain and to a 4% nondeductible excise tax on any amount by which distributions we pay with respect to any calendar year are less than

the sum of (1) 85% of our ordinary income, (2) 95% of our capital gain net income and (3) 100% of our undistributed income from prior years. Taxable income from certain non-REIT activities is managed through a TRS and is subject to applicable federal, state, and local income and margin taxes. We had no significant taxes associated with our TRS for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 and ~~2016.~~2018.

If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, we will be subject to U.S. federal income ~~tax, including any applicable alternative minimum~~ tax on our taxable income at regular corporate income tax rates, and dividends paid to our stockholders would not be deductible by us in computing taxable income. Any resulting corporate liability could be substantial and could materially and adversely affect our net income and net cash available for distribution to stockholders. Unless we were entitled to relief under certain Code provisions, we also would be disqualified from re-electing to be taxed as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year in which we failed to qualify to be taxed as a REIT.

We evaluate the accounting and disclosure of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in the course of preparing our tax returns to determine whether the tax positions are “more-likely-than-not” (greater than 50 percent probability) of being sustained by the applicable tax authority. Tax positions not deemed to meet the more-likely-than-not threshold would be recorded as a tax benefit or expense in the current year. Our management is required to analyze all open tax years, as defined by the statute of limitations, for all major jurisdictions, which include federal and certain states. We have no examinations in progress and none are expected at this time.

We recognize our tax positions and evaluate them using a two-step process. First, we determine whether a tax position is more likely than not to be sustained upon examination, including resolution of any related appeals or litigation processes, based on the technical merits of the position. Second, we will determine the amount of benefit to recognize and record the amount that is more likely than not to be realized upon ultimate settlement.

We had no material unrecognized tax benefit or expense, accrued interest or penalties as of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017. Our~~2019. We and our subsidiaries ~~and we~~ are subject to federal income tax as well as income tax of various state and local jurisdictions. The ~~2016~~2018, 2017 and ~~2015~~2016 tax years remain open to examination by tax jurisdictions to which our subsidiaries and we are subject. When applicable, we recognize interest and/or penalties related to uncertain tax positions on our consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income.

We intend to make regular quarterly dividend payments to holders of our common stock. U.S. federal income tax law generally requires that a REIT distribute annually at least 90% of its REIT taxable income, without regard to the deduction for dividends paid and excluding net capital gains. As a REIT, we will be subject to federal income tax on our undistributed REIT taxable income and net capital gain and to a 4% nondeductible excise tax on any amount by which distributions we pay with respect to any calendar year are less than the sum of (1) 85% of our ordinary income, (2) 95% of our capital gain net income and (3) 100% of our undistributed income from prior years. We intend to make regular quarterly dividend payments of all or substantially all of our taxable income to holders of our common stock out of assets legally available for this purpose, if and to the extent authorized by our Board. Before we make any dividend payments, whether for U.S. federal income tax purposes or otherwise, we must first meet both our operating requirements and debt service on our debt payable. If our cash available for distribution is less than our taxable income, we could be required to sell assets, borrow funds or raise additional capital to make cash dividends or we may make a portion of the required dividend in the form of a taxable distribution of stock or debt securities.

We will make dividend payments based on our estimate of taxable earnings per share of common stock, but not earnings calculated pursuant to GAAP. Our dividends and taxable income and GAAP earnings will typically differ due to items such as depreciation and amortization, fair value adjustments, differences in premium amortization and discount accretion, and non-deductible general and administrative expenses. Our quarterly dividends per share may be substantially different than our quarterly taxable earnings and GAAP earnings per share. Our Board declared our ~~third~~second quarterly dividend of ~~2017~~2019 of ~~$0.22~~$0.275 per share on ~~July 31, 2017,~~April 30, 2019, which was paid on ~~September 29, 2017~~June 28, 2019 and funded out of cash flows from operations.

As of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 and December 31, ~~2016,~~2018, we had no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.

~~Significant~~Critical Accounting Policies and ~~Critical Accounting~~ Estimates

~~Our significant accounting policies are those having the most impact on the reporting~~Management’s discussion and analysis of ~~our~~ financial condition and results of operations is based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with GAAP. The preparation of these financial statements requires our management to make judgments, assumptions and ~~those requiring significant~~estimates that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. We evaluate these judgments, assumptions and estimates for changes that would affect the reported amounts. These estimates are based on management’s historical industry experience and on various other judgments and assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these judgments, assumptions and estimates. ~~These~~Below is a discussion of the accounting policies ~~include those related to: (1) revenue recognition~~that we consider critical to understanding our financial condition or results of operations where there is uncertainty or where significant judgment is required. A discussion of recent accounting pronouncements and ~~(2) real estate investments, capital expenditures and impairment.~~

~~Our~~our significant accounting policies, ~~are disclosed~~including further discussion of the accounting policies described below, can be found in Note 2 “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” to ~~the~~our consolidated financial ~~statements.~~statements included in this quarterly report.

The allocation of total consideration, which is determined using inputs that are classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy established by FASB ASC 820, Fair Value Measurement and Disclosures (see Note 7 to our consolidated financial statements), is based on management’s estimate of the property’s “as-if” vacant fair value and is calculated by using all available information such as the replacement cost of such asset, appraisals, property condition reports, market data and other related information. If any debt is assumed in an acquisition, the difference between the fair value, which is estimated using inputs that are classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, and the face value of debt is recorded as a premium or discount and amortized as interest expense over the life of the debt assumed.

Real estate assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. In such cases, we will evaluate the recoverability of such real estate assets based on estimated future cash flows and the estimated liquidation value of such real estate assets, and provide for impairment if such undiscounted cash flows are insufficient to recover the carrying amount of the real estate asset. If impaired, the real estate asset will be written down to its estimated fair value.

The real estate market has not been affected significantly by inflation in the past several years due to a relatively low inflation rate. The majority of our lease terms are for a period of one year or less and reset to market if renewed. The majority of our leases also contain protection provisions applicable to reimbursement billings for utilities. Should inflation return, due to the short-term nature of our leases, we do not believe our results will be materially affected.

Inflation may also affect the overall cost of debt, as the implied cost of capital increases. Currently, interest rates are less than historical averages. However, if the Federal Reserve, ~~institutes new monetary policies, tightening credit~~ in response to or in anticipation of continued inflation concerns, could continue to raise interest ~~rates could rise.~~rates. We intend to mitigate these risks through long-term fixed interest rate loans and interest rate hedges, which to date have included interest rate cap and interest rate swap agreements.

We have elected to be taxed as a REIT under Sections 856 through 860 of the Code and expect to continue to qualify as a REIT. To qualify as a REIT, we must meet a number of organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement that we distribute at least 90% of our “REIT taxable income,” as defined by the Code, to our stockholders. Taxable income from certain non-REIT activities is managed through a TRS and is subject to applicable federal, state, and local income and margin taxes. We had no significant taxes associated with our TRS for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 and ~~2016.~~2018. We believe we qualify for taxation as a REIT under the Code, and we intend to continue to operate in such a manner, but no assurance can be given that we will operate in a manner so as to qualify as a REIT.

Market risk is the adverse effect on the value of assets and liabilities that results from a change in market conditions. Our primary market risk exposure is interest rate risk with respect to our indebtedness and counterparty credit risk with respect to our interest rate derivatives. In order to minimize counterparty credit risk, we enter into and expect to enter into hedging arrangements only with major financial institutions that have high credit ratings. As of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2019, we had total indebtedness of ~~$817.9~~$986.8 million at a weighted average interest rate of ~~3.25%~~3.98%, of which ~~$758.3~~$949.5 million was debt with a floating interest rate. The interest rate swap agreements we have entered into effectively fix the interest rate on ~~$650.0~~$750.0 million, or ~~96%~~84%, of our ~~$673.7~~$897.0 million of floating rate mortgage debt outstanding (see below). As of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2019, the adjusted weighted average interest rate of our total indebtedness was ~~3.34%~~3.21%. For purposes of calculating the adjusted weighted average interest rate of the total indebtedness, we have included the weighted average fixed rate of ~~1.3388%~~1.4272% for one-month LIBOR on the ~~$650.0~~$750.0 million notional amount of interest rate swap agreements that we have entered into as of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2019, which effectively fix the interest rate on ~~$650.0~~$750.0 million of our floating rate mortgage debt outstanding.

An increase in interest rates could make the financing of any acquisition by us ~~costlier.~~more costly. Rising interest rates could also limit our ability to refinance our debt when it matures or cause us to pay higher interest rates upon refinancing and increase interest expense on refinanced indebtedness. We may manage, or hedge, interest rate risks related to our borrowings by means of interest rate cap and interest rate swap agreements. As of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2019, the interest rate cap agreements we have entered into effectively cap one-month LIBOR on ~~$293.2~~$320.1 million of our floating rate mortgage debt at a weighted average rate of ~~4.20%~~5.82% for the term of the agreements, which is generally ~~3-4~~three to four years. We also expect to manage our exposure to interest rate risk by maintaining a mix of fixed and floating rates for our indebtedness.

In order to fix a portion of, and mitigate the risk associated with, our floating rate indebtedness (without incurring substantial prepayment penalties or defeasance costs typically associated with fixed rate indebtedness when repaid early or refinanced), we, through ~~our~~the OP, have entered into ~~seven~~nine interest rate swap transactions with ~~KeyBank (the “Counterparty”)~~the Counterparty with a combined notional amount of ~~$650.0~~$750.0 million. The interest rate swaps we have entered into effectively replace the floating interest rate (one-month LIBOR) with respect to that amount with a weighted average fixed rate of ~~1.3388%~~1.4272%. During the term of these interest rate swap agreements, we are required to make monthly fixed rate payments of ~~1.3388%~~1.4272%, on a weighted average basis, on the notional amounts,

while the Counterparty is obligated to make monthly floating rate payments based on one-month LIBOR to us referencing the same notional amounts. We have designated these interest rate swaps as cash flow hedges of interest rate risk.

Until our interest rates reach the caps provided by our interest rate cap agreements, each quarter point change in LIBOR would result in an approximate increase to annual interest expense costs on our floating rate indebtedness, reduced by any payments due from the Counterparty under the terms of the interest rate swap agreements we ~~have~~had entered into as of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2019, of the amounts illustrated in the table below for our indebtedness as of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017 (in~~2019 (dollars in thousands):

Change in Interest Rates	Annual Increase to Interest Expense		Annual Increase to Interest Expense
0.25%	$	270	$	500
0.50%		540		1,000
0.75%		810		1,500
1.00%		1,080		2,000

There is no assurance that we would realize such expense as such changes in interest rates could alter our liability positions or strategies in response to such changes.

We may also be exposed to credit risk in the derivative financial instruments we use. Credit risk is the failure of the ~~counterparty~~Counterparty to perform under the terms of the derivative financial instruments. If the fair value of a derivative financial instrument is positive, the ~~counterparty~~Counterparty will owe us, which creates credit risk for us. If the fair value of a derivative financial instrument is negative, we will owe the ~~counterparty~~Counterparty and, therefore, do not have credit risk. We seek to minimize the credit risk in derivative financial instruments by entering into transactions with ~~high-quality counterparties.~~major financial institutions that have high credit ratings.

In July 2017, the Financial Conduct Authority (the authority that regulates LIBOR) announced it intends to stop compelling banks to submit rates for the calculation of LIBOR after 2021. The Alternative Reference Rates Committee (“ARRC”) has proposed that the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”) is the rate that represents best practice as the alternative to USD-LIBOR for use in derivatives and other financial contracts that are currently indexed to USD-LIBOR. ARRC has proposed a paced market transition plan to SOFR from USD-LIBOR and organizations are currently working on industry wide and company specific transition plans as it relates to derivatives and cash markets exposed to USD-LIBOR. We have material contracts that are indexed to USD-LIBOR and are monitoring this activity and evaluating the related risks.

As required by Rule 13a-15(b) and Rule 15d-15(b) under the Exchange Act, our management, including our President and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated, as of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2019, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e) and Rule 15d-15(e). Based on that evaluation, our President and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2019, to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the rules and forms of the Exchange Act and is accumulated and communicated to management, including the President and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.

We believe, however, that a controls system, no matter how well designed and operated, cannot provide absolute assurance that the objectives of the controls systems are met, and no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud or error, if any, within a company have been detected.

There has been no change in internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the ~~quarter~~three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

From time to time, we are party to legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of our business. Management is not aware of any legal proceedings of which the outcome is reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition, nor are we aware of any such legal proceedings contemplated by government agencies.

We have disclosed under Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report, filed with the ~~U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission~~SEC on ~~March 15, 2017,~~February 19, 2019, risk factors which materially affect our business, financial condition or results of operations. There have been no material changes from the risk factors previously disclosed. You should carefully consider the risk factors set forth in the Annual Report and the other information set forth elsewhere in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q. You should be aware that these risk factors and other information may not describe every risk facing our company. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and/or operating results.

On June 15, 2016, our Board authorized us to repurchase an indeterminate number of shares of our common stock at an aggregate market value of up to $30 million during a two-year period that ~~expires~~was set to expire on June 15, ~~2018. The following table provides information on~~2018 (the “Share Repurchase Program”). On April 30, 2018, our Board increased the Share Repurchase Program to up to $40 million and extended it by an additional two years to June 15, 2020. There were no purchases of equity securities during the ~~three~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017:~~2019.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

300 Crescent Court, Suite 700, Dallas, Texas		~~75201~~
300 Crescent Court, Suite 700, Dallas, Texas	(Address of Principal Executive Offices)		75201
(Zip Code)

Large Accelerated Filer	☐		Accelerated Filer	☒
Non-Accelerated Filer	☐	~~(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)~~	Smaller reporting company	☐
Emerging growth company	☒

~~Page~~
	Page
Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements				ii

~~PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION~~

~~Item 1.~~	~~Financial Statements~~

	~~Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2017 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2016~~				1PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.		Financial Statements
		Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2019 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2018		1
		Consolidated Unaudited Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the Three and ~~Nine~~Six Months Ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 and ~~2016~~2018		2

	Consolidated Unaudited ~~Statement~~Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the ~~Nine~~Three and Six Months Ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 and 2018		3

	Consolidated Unaudited Statements of Cash Flows for the ~~Nine~~Six Months Ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 and ~~2016~~2018	4	5

	Notes to Consolidated Unaudited Financial Statements	6
		7
Item 2.		Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	32
		30
Item 3.		Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	55	51
Item 4.		Controls and Procedures		52

~~Item 4.~~	~~Controls and Procedures~~	56

	PART II—OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.		Legal Proceedings	57
		53
Item 1A.		Risk Factors	57
		53
Item 2.		Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	57
		53
Item 3.		Defaults Upon Senior Securities	57	53
Item 4.		Mine Safety Disclosures		53
Item 5.		Other Information		53
Item 6.		Exhibits		54
Signatures
~~Item 4.~~	~~Mine Safety Disclosures~~	57

~~Item 5.~~	~~Other Information~~	57

~~Item 6.~~	~~Exhibits~~	58

~~Signatures~~		5955

Redeemable noncontrolling interests in the OP, December 31, 2016	$	—
Issuance of redeemable noncontrolling interests in the OP		2,000
Net income attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interests in the OP		162
Other comprehensive income attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interests in the OP		1
Distributions to redeemable noncontrolling interests in the OP		(53	)
Redeemable noncontrolling interests in the OP, September 30, 2017	$	2,110

Redeemable noncontrolling interests in the OP, December 31, 2018	$	2,567
Net loss attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interests in the OP		(19	)
Other comprehensive loss attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interests in the OP		(50	)
Contributions from redeemable noncontrolling interests in the OP		197
Distributions to redeemable noncontrolling interests in the OP		(39	)
Adjustment to reflect redemption value of redeemable noncontrolling interests in the OP		376
Redeemable noncontrolling interests in the OP, June 30, 2019	$	3,032


☒	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


☐	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

	Preferred Stock					Common Stock						Additional			Accumulated Earnings			Accumulated Other			Common Stock Held in
	Number of Shares			Par Value		Number of Shares			Par Value			Paid-in Capital			Less Dividends			Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Treasury at Cost			Noncontrolling Interests			Total
Balances, December 31, 2016		—		$	—		21,293,825		$	213		$	241,450		$	(14,584	)	$	9,052		$	(4,587	)	$	24,558		$	256,102
Net income attributable to common stockholders													—			57,704			—			—			—			57,704
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests													—			—			—			—			2,836			2,836
Contributions by noncontrolling interests													—			—			—			—			38			38
Distributions to noncontrolling interests													—			—			—			—			(4,789	)		(4,789	)
Purchase of noncontrolling interests													(31,313	)		—			—			—			(22,527	)		(53,840	)
Repurchase of common stock													—			—			—			(1,354	)		—			(1,354	)
Retirement of common stock held in treasury							(308,313	)		(3	)		(5,938	)		—			—			5,941			—			—
Vesting of stock-based compensation							110,257			1			2,414			—			—			—			—			2,415
Common stock dividends declared													—			(14,160	)		—			—			—			(14,160	)
Other comprehensive loss													—			—			(720	)		—			(116	)		(836	)
Balances, September 30, 2017		—	��	$	—		21,095,769		$	211		$	206,613		$	28,960		$	8,332		$	—		$	—		$	244,116

Land		Not depreciated
Buildings		30 years
Improvements		15 years
Furniture, fixtures, and equipment		3 years
Intangible lease assets		6 months

	September 30, 2017		September 30, 2016
Cash and cash equivalents	$	92,695	$	34,086
Restricted cash		29,417		34,110
Total cash and restricted cash	$	122,112	$	68,196

Property Name		Location	Date of Sale	Sales Price		Net Cash Proceeds (1)			Gain on Sale of Real Estate
The Miramar Apartments	(2)	Dallas, Texas	April 3, 2017	$	16,550	$	16,326		$	6,368
Toscana	(3)	Dallas, Texas	April 3, 2017		13,250		13,040			4,283
The Grove at Alban		Frederick, Maryland	April 3, 2017		27,500		27,021			4,514
Twelve 6 Ten at the Park	(2)	Dallas, Texas	April 27, 2017		26,600		26,349			4,731
Regatta Bay	(4)	Seabrook, Texas	July 14, 2017		28,200		27,670			10,423
The Arbors, The Crossings, The Crossings at Holcomb Bridge and The Knolls	(5)	Atlanta, Georgia	September 29, 2017		116,000		114,010			48,067
				$	228,100	$	224,416	(6)	$	78,386

	Type	Term (months)		Amortization (months)		Outstanding Principal			Interest Rate (1)		Maturity Date
$30 Million Credit Facility	Floating		24		360	$	30,000			5.23%	12/29/2018
Deferred financing costs, net of accumulated amortization of $115							(197	)
						$	29,803

2017 Bridge Facility	Floating		4		360	$	54,597			4.98%	10/31/2017
Deferred financing costs, net of accumulated amortization of $198							(66	)
						$	54,531

	Location of gain (loss)	Amount of gain (loss) recognized in income
	recognized in income	2019			2018
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
For the three months ended June 30,
Interest rate products	Interest expense		(1	)		(12	)
For the six months ended June 30,
Interest rate products	Interest expense	$	(27	)	$	(2	)

	Location of gain (loss)	Amount of gain (loss) recognized in income on derivative
	recognized in income	2017			2016
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
For the three months ended September 30,
Interest rate products	Interest expense		—			(2	)
For the nine months ended September 30,
Interest rate products	Interest expense		(5	)		(8	)

Property Name (1)	Location	Sales Price		Debt Outstanding (2)		Real Estate Carrying Value, net (2)
Edgewater at Sandy Springs	Atlanta, Georgia		101,250	$	52,000	$	52,685
Abbington Heights	Antioch, Tennessee		28,050		16,920		16,662
Belmont at Duck Creek	Garland, Texas		29,500		17,760		17,082
The Ashlar	Dallas, Texas		29,400		14,520		15,806
Heatherstone	Dallas, Texas		16,275		8,880		9,656
The Pointe at the Foothills	Mesa, Arizona		85,400		34,800		46,608
		$	289,875	$	144,880	$	158,499

Period	Total Number of Shares Purchased		Average Price Paid Per Share		Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs		Approximate Dollar Value of Shares that may yet be Purchased under the Plans or Programs (in millions)
Beginning Balance		250,156	$	18.34		250,156	$	25.4
July 1 – July 31		—		—		—		25.4
August 1 – August 31		31,616		23.28		31,616		24.7
September 1 – September 30		26,541		23.26		26,541		24.1
Balance as of September 30, 2017		308,313	$	19.27		308,313	$	24.1

Exhibit Number		~~Exhibit~~ Description

10.2* 10.1*		~~Amended~~Purchase and ~~Restated Limited Partnership~~Sale Agreement, ~~of NexPoint Residential Trust Operating Partnership, L.P.~~dated June 25, 2019, by and among the Company and Bridge Acquisitions, Asset Management and Dispositions, LLC

31.1*		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

31.2*		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

~~32.1+~~ 32.1⁺		Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002

101.INS*		XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH*		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

101.CAL*		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

101.DEF*		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

101.LAB*		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document

101.PRE*		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

Signature	Title	Date


/s/ Jim Dondero	President and Director	~~October 31, 2017~~July 30, 2019
Jim Dondero	(Principal Executive Officer)


/s/ Brian Mitts	Chief Financial Officer and Director	~~October 31, 2017~~July 30, 2019
Brian Mitts	(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)