UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

_______________________________________________________

☒
☒			QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended ~~September 30, 2017~~

March 31, 2022

☐
☐			TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number:

000-50679

~~000-50679~~

CORCEPT THERAPEUTICS INCORPORATED

(Exact Name of Corporation as Specified in Its Charter)

_______________________________________________________

~~Delaware~~

~~77-0487658~~

Delaware

77-0487658

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

149 Commonwealth Drive

Menlo Park, CA 94025

(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)

(650) 327-3270

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:


Title of each class	Trading Symbol(s)	Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, $0.001 par value	CORT	The Nasdaq Stock Market

Indicate by check mark whether the ~~registrant~~registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically ~~and posted on its corporate Web site, if any,~~ every Interactive Data File required to be submitted ~~and posted~~ pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit ~~and post~~ such files). Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer

☒

☐

Accelerated filer

☒

☐

Non-accelerated filer

☐

☐ ~~(Do not check if a small reporting company)~~

Smaller reporting company

☐

Emerging growth company

☐

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒

On ~~October 30, 2017,~~April 28, 2022, there were ~~114,124,161~~106,250,716 shares of common stock outstanding at a par value of $0.001 per share.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I. ~~FINANCIAL~~FINANCIAL INFORMATION

~~ITEM 1.~~

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

CORCEPT THERAPEUTICS INCORPORATED

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In ~~thousands, except per share data)~~

thousands)

	September 30,			December 31,
	2017			2016				March 31, 2022		December 31, 2021
	(Unaudited)			(See Note 1)				(Unaudited)		(See Note 1)
ASSETS							ASSETS
Current assets:							Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	31,060		$	51,536		Cash and cash equivalents	$	61,862	$	77,617
Short-term marketable securities		44,096			—		Short-term marketable securities	283,665		145,918
Trade receivables, net of allowances		11,872			9,860		Trade receivables, net of allowances	27,178		27,625
Inventory		3,828			2,329		Inventory	5,079		4,988
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		3,086			1,964		Prepaid expenses and other current assets	10,436		10,315
Total current assets		93,942			65,689		Total current assets	388,220		266,463
Strategic inventory		1,680			2,835		Strategic inventory	13,098		12,962
Operating lease right-of-use asset							Operating lease right-of-use asset	2,816		514
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation		553			205		Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation	726		1,002
Long-term marketable securities		1,508			—		Long-term marketable securities	22,566		112,277
Other assets (Note 5)		12,989			24
Other assets							Other assets	2,984		3,083
Deferred tax assets, net							Deferred tax assets, net	37,713		27,455
Total assets	$	110,672		$	68,753		Total assets	$	468,123	$	423,756
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY							LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:							Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	6,226		$	2,290		Accounts payable	$	9,269	$	6,908
Accrued clinical expenses		1,892			1,467
Other accrued liabilities		16,252			8,953
Long-term obligation - current portion		—			14,664
Accrued research and development expenses							Accrued research and development expenses	13,051		12,442
Accrued and other liabilities							Accrued and other liabilities	32,660		27,665
Short-term operating lease liability							Short-term operating lease liability	2,264		526
Total current liabilities		24,370			27,374		Total current liabilities	57,244		47,541
Commitments and contingencies (Note 5)
Long-term operating lease liability							Long-term operating lease liability	552		—
Long-term accrued income taxes payable							Long-term accrued income taxes payable	2,516		409
Total liabilities							Total liabilities	60,312		47,950
Commitments and contingencies (Note 4)							Commitments and contingencies (Note 4)
Stockholders’ equity:							Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share, 10,000 shares authorized and no shares outstanding at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016		—			—
Common stock, par value $0.001 per share, 280,000 shares authorized and 114,082 and 112,710 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively		114			113
Preferred stock							Preferred stock	—		—
Common stock							Common stock	128		127
Treasury stock							Treasury stock	(417,448)		(410,411)
Additional paid-in capital		377,678			363,534		Additional paid-in capital	608,717		591,349
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(14	)		—		Accumulated other comprehensive loss	(1,351)		(227)
Accumulated deficit		(291,476	)		(322,268	)
Retained earnings							Retained earnings	217,765		194,968
Total stockholders’ equity		86,302			41,379		Total stockholders’ equity	407,811		375,806
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	110,672		$	68,753		Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	468,123	$	423,756

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

CORCEPT THERAPEUTICS INCORPORATED

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(Unaudited)

(In thousands, except per share data)

	Three Months Ended					Nine Months Ended
	September 30,					September 30,							Three Months Ended March 31,
	2017		2016			2017			2016				2022		2021
Product revenue, net	$	42,763	$	21,725		$	105,921		$	57,509		Product revenue, net	$	93,688	$	79,437
Operating expenses:												Operating expenses:
Cost of sales		976		668			2,397			1,497		Cost of sales	1,250		1,268
Research and development		11,693		7,054			26,745			17,360		Research and development	28,120		29,022
Selling, general and administrative		16,471		10,931			45,621			33,480		Selling, general and administrative	37,549		29,509
Total operating expenses		29,140		18,653			74,763			52,337		Total operating expenses	66,919		59,799
Income from operations		13,623		3,072			31,158			5,172		Income from operations	26,769		19,638
Interest and other income (expense)		86		(487	)		(237	)		(1,629	)
Interest and other income												Interest and other income	80		275
Income before income taxes		13,709		2,585			30,921			3,543		Income before income taxes	26,849		19,913
Income tax benefit (expense)		48		—			(129	)		—
Income tax (expense) benefit												Income tax (expense) benefit	(4,052)		3,552
Net income	$	13,757	$	2,585		$	30,792		$	3,543		Net income	$	22,797	$	23,465
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Net unrealized gain (loss) on available-for-sale investments		3		—			(14	)		—
Other comprehensive income:												Other comprehensive income:
Unrealized loss on available-for-sale investments, net of tax effect of $323 and $61, respectively												Unrealized loss on available-for-sale investments, net of tax effect of $323 and $61, respectively	(1,019)		(192)
Foreign currency translation (loss) gain, net of tax												Foreign currency translation (loss) gain, net of tax	(105)		26
Total comprehensive income	$	13,760	$	2,585		$	30,778		$	3,543		Total comprehensive income	$	21,673	$	23,299

Basic net income per common share	$	0.12	$	0.02		$	0.27		$	0.03
Basic net income per share												Basic net income per share	$	0.22	$	0.20

Diluted net income per common share	$	0.11	$	0.02		$	0.25		$	0.03
Diluted net income per share												Diluted net income per share	$	0.20	$	0.18

Weighted-average shares outstanding used in computing net income per share												Weighted-average shares outstanding used in computing net income per share
Basic		113,603		110,652			113,242			110,118		Basic	106,012		116,818
Diluted		125,651		116,419			123,417			115,163		Diluted	115,037		129,668

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

CORCEPT THERAPEUTICS INCORPORATED

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

(In thousands)

	Nine Months Ended
	September 30,							Three Months Ended March 31,
	2017			2016				2022		2021
Cash flows from operating activities:							Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	30,792		$	3,543		Net income	$	22,797	$	23,465
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash generated from operations:
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operations:							Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operations:
Stock-based compensation		9,529			5,101		Stock-based compensation	10,761		10,101
Accretion of interest expense		456			1,562
Amortization of debt financing costs		14			16
Amortization of interest income							Amortization of interest income	1,106		1,194
Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment		58			72		Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment	288		254
Deferred income taxes							Deferred income taxes	(9,935)		(5,360)
Non-cash amortization of right-of-use asset							Non-cash amortization of right-of-use asset	514		489
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:							Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Trade receivables		(2,012	)		(2,015	)	Trade receivables	447		3,998
Inventory		(344	)		(825	)	Inventory	(163)		866
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		(1,122	)		(679	)	Prepaid expenses and other current assets	(9)		(2,850)
Other assets (Note 5)		(12,965	)		—
Accounts payable		3,922			2,984		Accounts payable	2,256		(3,493)
Accrued clinical expenses		425			604
Other accrued liabilities		7,299			3,617
Deferred revenue		—			(158	)
Accrued research and development expenses							Accrued research and development expenses	609		(138)
Accrued and other liabilities							Accrued and other liabilities	4,995		(3,217)
Long-term accrued income taxes							Long-term accrued income taxes	2,107		597
Operating lease liability							Operating lease liability	(526)		(484)
Net cash provided by operating activities		36,052			13,822		Net cash provided by operating activities	35,247		25,422
Cash flows from investing activities:							Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchases of property and equipment		(390	)		(119	)	Purchases of property and equipment	(12)		(126)
Proceeds from maturities of marketable securities							Proceeds from maturities of marketable securities	42,127		124,230
Purchases of marketable securities		(45,618	)		—		Purchases of marketable securities	(92,611)		(127,388)
Cash used in investing activities		(46,008	)		(119	)
Net cash used in investing activities							Net cash used in investing activities	(50,496)		(3,284)
Cash flows from financing activities:							Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from issuance of common stock upon exercise of options and warrants, net of issuance costs		4,614			4,073
Payments related to long-term obligation		(15,134	)		(10,346	)
Proceeds from exercise of stock options, net of issuance costs							Proceeds from exercise of stock options, net of issuance costs	1,382		4,038
Repurchase of common stock							Repurchase of common stock	—		(33,541)
Cash paid to satisfy statutory withholding requirement for net settlement of cashless option exercises							Cash paid to satisfy statutory withholding requirement for net settlement of cashless option exercises	(1,888)		(16,444)
Net cash used in financing activities		(10,520	)		(6,273	)	Net cash used in financing activities	(506)		(45,947)
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents		(20,476	)		7,430
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents							Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents	(15,755)		(23,809)
Cash and cash equivalents, at beginning of period		51,536			40,435		Cash and cash equivalents, at beginning of period	77,617		76,190
Cash and cash equivalents, at end of period	$	31,060		$	47,865		Cash and cash equivalents, at end of period	$	61,862	$	52,381

Supplemental disclosure:							Supplemental disclosure:
Cost of shares repurchased for net settlement of cashless option exercises							Cost of shares repurchased for net settlement of cashless option exercises	$	5,149	$	6,045
Recognition of right-of-use asset and lease liability							Recognition of right-of-use asset and lease liability	$	2,816	$	—

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

CORCEPT THERAPEUTICS INCORPORATED

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(Unaudited)

(In thousands)


	Common Stock			Additional Paid-in Capital		Treasury Stock		Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)		Retained Earnings		Total Stockholders’ Equity
	Shares	Amount
Balance at December 31, 2020	116,735	$	122	$	516,140	$	(75,795)	$	415	$	82,456	$	523,338
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of options	1,832	2		10,081		—		—		—		10,083
Purchases of treasury stock	(1,282)	—		—		(33,540)		—		—		(33,540)
Shares purchased to satisfy cost and statutory withholding requirements for net settlement of cashless option exercises	(808)	—		—		(22,520)		—		—		(22,520)
Stock-based compensation	—	—		10,142		—		—		—		10,142
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax	—	—		—		—		(166)		—		(166)
Net income	—	—		—		—		—		23,465		23,465
Balance at March 31, 2021	116,477	$	124	$	536,363	$	(131,855)	$	249	$	105,921	$	510,802

Balance at December 31, 2021	105,940	$	127	$	591,349	$	(410,411)	$	(227)	$	194,968	$	375,806
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of options	586	1		6,543		—		—		—		6,544
Shares purchased to satisfy cost and statutory withholding requirements for net settlement of cashless option exercises	(305)	—		—		(7,037)		—		—		(7,037)
Stock-based compensation	—	—		10,825		—		—		—		10,825
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax	—	—		—		—		(1,124)		—		(1,124)
Net income	—	—		—		—		—		22,797		22,797
Balance at March 31, 2022	106,221	$	128	$	608,717	$	(417,448)	$	(1,351)	$	217,765	$	407,811

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements

CORCEPT THERAPEUTICS INCORPORATED

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Description of Business and Basis of Presentation

Corcept Therapeutics Incorporated ~~was incorporated in the State of Delaware in May 1998, and our headquarters are located in Menlo Park, California.~~ ~~We are~~is a commercial-stage pharmaceutical company engaged in the discovery ~~development~~ and ~~commercialization~~development of medications that treat severe endocrine, metabolic, oncologic, and ~~psychiatric~~neurological disorders by modulating the ~~effect~~effects of the ~~stress~~ hormone cortisol. In 2012, the United States Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) approved Korlym^® (“mifepristone”) 300 mg tablets as a once-daily oral medication for treatment of hyperglycemia secondary to hypercortisolism in adult patients with endogenous Cushing’s syndrome who have type 2 diabetes mellitus or glucose intolerance and have failed surgery or are not candidates for surgery. We have discovered and patented three structurally distinct series of selective cortisol modulators, consisting of more than 500 compounds. We are developing compounds from these series to treat a broad range of disorders.

~~Basis of Presentation~~

We have prepared the September 30, 2017 balance sheet and the statements of comprehensive income and cash flows in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. They do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2017 or any other period. These financial statements and notes should be read in conjunction with the financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2016 included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K. The December 31, 2016 balance sheet has been derived from audited financial statements at that date.

~~Principles of Consolidation~~

Our financial statements include the financial position and results of Corcept Therapeutics UK Limited, our wholly owned subsidiary. Corcept Therapeutics UK Limited was incorporated in the United Kingdom in March 2017, and to date, there have been no material financial transactions or balances related to this entity.

~~Use of Estimates~~

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates.

We reevaluate our estimates and assumptions each quarter, including those related to revenue recognition, sales returns, inventory, allowances for doubtful accounts and accrued liabilities, including our bonus accrual, clinical trial accruals and stock-based compensation.

~~Fair Value Measurements~~

~~We value financial instruments using the assumptions we believe third-party market participants would adopt when valuing such instruments. Our methodology uses a “fair value hierarchy” that~~ gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets for identical instruments (called “Level 1 inputs”). If no Level 1 inputs are available, we consider (i) quoted prices in non-active markets for identical instruments; (ii) active markets for similar instruments; (iii) inputs other than quoted prices for the instrument; and (iv) inputs that are not directly observable, but that are corroborated by observable data (“Level 2 inputs”). In the absence of Level 2 inputs, we rely on unobservable inputs, such as our own data about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the instrument (“Level 3 inputs”). Fair value is a market-based measurement and should therefore be based on the assumptions that third-party market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.

~~Cash and Cash Equivalents and Marketable Securities~~

We consider all highly liquid investments purchased with original maturities of three months or less from the date of purchase to be cash equivalents. Cash equivalents are carried at fair value as measured using Level 1 inputs, which approximates cost~~. As of December 31, 2016, all of our funds were held in checking and money market fund accounts maintained at major U.S. financial institutions.~~

~~CORCEPT THERAPEUTICS INCORPORATED~~

~~NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, continued~~

Effective January 2017, we invested a portion of our funds in marketable securities, primarily U.S. Treasury securities, commercial paper and corporate notes. We classify our marketable securities as available-for-sale securities and report them at fair value as “cash equivalents” or “marketable securities” on our balance sheet, with related unrealized gains and losses included in stockholders' equity. Realized gains and losses and permanent declines in value are included in “interest and other income” in our statement of comprehensive income.

~~Concentration of Credit Risk~~

We are subject to credit risk from our portfolio of cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities. We limit our investments to U.S. Treasury obligations and high-grade corporate debt with less than a 36-month maturity. We are not exposed to any significant concentration of credit from these investments.

~~Inventory~~

We value inventory at the lower of cost or net realizable value. We determine the cost of inventory using the specific identification method, which approximates a first-in, first-out basis. We write down inventory that has become obsolete or has a cost basis in excess of its expected net realizable value. Any expired inventory is disposed of and the related costs are recognized as cost of sales in the statement of comprehensive income in that period.

~~Inventory amounts that are not expected to be consumed within 12 months following the balance sheet date are classified as strategic inventory, a noncurrent asset.~~

We expense the manufacturing costs for product candidates incurred prior to regulatory approval as research and development expense as we incur them. We begin capitalizing costs related to the manufacture of a product candidate when we obtain regulatory approval to begin marketing that product.

~~Long-term Obligation~~

In August 2012, we entered into a Purchase and Sale Agreement (“Financing Agreement”) with Biopharma Secured Debt Fund II Sub, S.à r.l (“Biopharma”), a private limited liability company organized under the laws of Luxembourg. Under the terms of the Financing Agreement, we received $30.0 million from Biopharma, which we recorded as a long-term obligation. In return, we were obligated to make payments to Biopharma totaling $45.0 million. These payments equaled a percentage of (i) our net product sales, including sales from any product containing mifepristone or any of our proprietary selective cortisol modulators (“Covered Products”) and (ii) cash or cash equivalents received from any licensing transaction or co-promotion arrangement involving Covered Products (together, “Korlym Receipts”). Once we had paid Biopharma a total of $45.0 million, no more payments would be due and the obligation would be extinguished.

We recognized a portion of each quarterly payment under the Financing Agreement as interest expense, which we determined by calculating the interest rate to Biopharma implied by the stream of quarterly payments we expected to make. In each period, the amount shown on our balance sheet as the current portion was our estimate of the amount we expected to pay Biopharma in the following 12 months. We recorded the rest of the outstanding portion of the obligation, if any, as a long-term liability.

~~We made our final payment to Biopharma, completely satisfying our obligations under the Financing Agreement, in July 2017.~~

~~See Note 4,~~ ~~Long-Term Obligation, for additional information regarding this agreement.~~

~~Net Product Sales~~

~~We primarily sell Korlym directly to patients through a specialty pharmacy. We recognize revenue upon the delivery of Korlym~~ if (i) there is persuasive evidence that an arrangement exists with the customer, (ii) collectability is reasonably assured and (iii) the sales price is fixed or determinable. In order to conclude that the price is fixed or determinable, we must be able to (i) calculate gross product revenue from a sale and (ii) reasonably estimate the associated net revenue. ~~Confirmation of coverage by the patient’s private or government insurance plan or by a third-party charity is a prerequisite for selling Korlym to a patient. We provide Korlym at no cost to patients without insurance who do not qualify for charitable support.~~

Through August 9, 2017 our exclusive specialty pharmacy was Dohmen Life Science Services (“Dohmen”). On August 10, 2017, Optime Care, Inc. (“Optime”) became our exclusive specialty pharmacy.

~~CORCEPT THERAPEUTICS INCORPORATED~~

~~NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, continued~~

We also sell Korlym to a specialty distributor (“SD”), which we recognize at the time the SD receives the Korlym. SD sales were less than two percent of our net revenue in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017.

~~We donate cash to charities that help patients with financial need pay for the treatment of Cushing’s syndrome. We do not include payments we receive from these organizations in revenue.~~

We calculate gross product revenues based on the price we charge our customers. We estimate net product revenues by deducting from gross product revenues (a) estimated government rebates, (b) estimated costs of our patient co-pay assistance program, (c) discounts for prompt payment and (d) reserves for expected product returns. We record estimates for these deductions at the time we recognize the gross revenue and update them as new information becomes available.

~~Rebates and Chargebacks:~~ Korlym is eligible for purchase by or qualifies for partial or full reimbursement from Medicaid and other government programs. We estimate any government rebate amounts by applying the discount rates applicable to each government-funded program against our sales to patients covered by such programs.

~~Allowances for Patient Assistance Program:~~ ~~It is our policy that no patient be denied Korlym due to inability to pay.~~ We provide financial assistance to eligible patients whose insurance policies require them to pay high deductibles and co-payments. We determine the amount of such assistance by applying our program guidelines to all eligible sales in the period.

~~Sales Returns~~: We deduct from each period’s gross revenue the amount of Korlym we estimate will be returned. When estimating returns, we analyze quantitative and qualitative information including, but not limited to, historical return rates, the amount of product in the distribution channel, the expiration date of the product, current and projected product demand, the introduction of competing products that may erode demand, and broad economic and industry-wide indicators. If we cannot reasonably estimate product returns with respect to a particular sale, we defer recognition of revenue from that sale until we can make a reasonable estimate.

~~Research and Development~~

Research and development expenses consist of direct expenses, such as the cost of discovery research, pre-clinical studies, and clinical trials relating to our portfolio of proprietary, selective cortisol modulators, manufacturing development, preparations for submissions to the FDA or other regulatory agencies and related overhead expenses. We expense nonrefundable payments and the cost of technologies and materials used in research and development as they are incurred.

We base our cost accruals for research, preclinical activities, and clinical trials on estimates of work completed under service agreements, milestones achieved, patient enrollment and past experience with similar contracts. Our estimates of work completed and associated cost accruals include our assessments of information from third-party contract research organizations and the overall status of clinical trial and other development and administrative activities.

~~Segment Reporting~~

We determine our operating segments based on the way we organize our business, make decisions and assess performance. We have only one operating segment, which is the discovery, development and commercialization of pharmaceutical products.

~~Stock-Based Compensation~~

We account for stock-based compensation related to option grants under the fair value method, based on the value of the award at the grant date, using the Black-Scholes option valuation model. We recognize this expense over the requisite vesting period, net of estimated forfeitures~~. If actual forfeitures differ from our estimates, we adjust stock-based compensation expense accordingly~~.

~~We recognize the expense of options granted to non-employees based on the fair value based measurement of the option grants at the time of vesting.~~

~~Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements~~

In August 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-15 (Subtopic 205-40), “Presentation of Financial Statements—Going Concern: Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern”. We adopted this standard on January 1, 2017. Because we generated cash in 2015 and 2016 and expect to generate cash in 2017, adoption had no impact on our financial statements.

~~CORCEPT THERAPEUTICS INCORPORATED~~

~~NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, continued~~

In July 2015, FASB issued ASU No. 2015-11, Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory, which requires certain inventory to be measured at the lower of cost or net realizable value. We adopted this standard on January 1, 2017 and it did not have a material impact on our financial statements.

In November 2015, FASB issued ASU No. 2015-17 "Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes," which requires that deferred tax liabilities and assets be classified as noncurrent. We adopted this standard prospectively on January 1, 2017. Because we have a valuation allowance equal to the full amount of our deferred tax assets, adoption did not have a material impact on our financial statements.

In March 2016, FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718) “Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting,” which simplifies accounting for transactions involving shares awarded to employees. It requires companies to record excess tax benefits and deficiencies as income tax expenses or benefits instead of including them in additional paid-in capital. At the start of the year in which they implement the guidance, companies must adjust retained earnings by an amount equal to any previously unrecognized excess tax expenses or benefits. We adopted this guidance on January 1, 2017, at which time we recognized a $0.7 million deferred tax asset, which was offset by a corresponding increase to our deferred tax valuation allowance, resulting in no change to our balance sheet. We elected to report on a prospective basis cash flows related to excess tax benefits as an operating activity and to ~~continue to recognize stock compensation expense net of estimated forfeitures. Adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on our financial statements.~~

~~Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted~~

In May 2014, FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers,” which changes the way companies recognize revenue. We plan to adopt this update using the modified retrospective approach, with the cumulative effect of adoption being recorded to our retained earnings on January 1, 2018. We have completed our evaluation of the contracts governing our sales process and are reviewing our related disclosures, policies and controls, which we will change as required when we adopt the standard. Because our arrangements with customers contain variable consideration, we have focused our analysis on how the new standard will affect our estimate of transaction prices, which we believe the update will not change materially. We do not believe adoption will have a material impact on our financial statements.

In February 2016, FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, “Leases”, which requires the recognition of lease transactions with terms longer than 12 months on the balance sheet as “lease liabilities” and “right-of-use assets.” We plan to adopt this new standard prospectively on January 1, 2019. We expect that adoption will increase our “lease liabilities” and “right-of-use assets” equally.

In August 2016, FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments.” We plan to adopt this standard on January 1, 2018, and do not expect it to have a material impact on our financial statements.

In May 2017 FASB issued ASU No. 2017-09, Stock Compensation (Topic 718): “Scope of Modification Accounting,” which changes the accounting for modifications to the terms and conditions of share-based payment awards. ~~We plan to adopt this standard on January 1, 2018 and do not expect it to have a material impact on our financial statements~~.

~~2. Composition of Certain Balance Sheet Items~~

~~Inventory~~

~~The composition of inventory was as follows:~~

September 30,

December 31,

2017

2016

(in thousands)

Raw materials

$
1,122

$
1,848

Work in progress

1,934

1,414

Finished goods

2,452

1,902

Total inventory

5,508

5,164

Less strategic inventory classified as non-current

(1,680
)

(2,835
)
Total inventory classified as current

$
3,828

$
2,329

~~CORCEPT THERAPEUTICS INCORPORATED~~

~~NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, continued~~

In order to be prepared for potential demand for Korlym and because we rely on single-source manufacturers of both the active pharmaceutical ingredient (“API”) for Korlym and Korlym tablets, we have purchased significant inventory of these materials. We classify inventory we do not expect to use within 12 months of the balance sheet date as “Strategic Inventory,” a long-term asset.

~~Other Accrued Liabilities~~

~~Other accrued liabilities consisted of the following:~~

September 30,

December 31,

2017

2016

(in thousands)

Government rebates

$
6,955

$
3,426

Accrued compensation

7,886

4,702

Commercialization costs

415

308

Legal fees

342

164

Professional fees

247

34

Other

407

319

Total other accrued liabilities

$
16,252

$
8,953

~~3. Available-for-Sale Securities and Fair Value Measurements~~

~~Our available-for-sale securities included:~~

Fair Value

Estimated Fair Value

Hierarchy

September 30,

December 31,

Level

2017

2016

(in thousands)

Corporate bonds

Level 2

$
18,394

$
—

Commercial paper

Level 2

23,331

—

U.S. treasury securities

Level 1

7,778

—

Money market funds

Level 1

10,330

31,605

Total Marketable securities

$
59,833

$
31,605

Classified as:

Cash equivalents

$
14,229

$
31,605

Short-term marketable securities

44,096

—

Long-term marketable securities

1,508

—

Total marketable securities

$
59,833

$
31,605

The estimated fair value of marketable securities is based on quoted market prices for these or similar investments obtained from a commercial pricing service. The fair value of marketable securities classified within Level 2 is based upon inputs that may include benchmark yields, reported trades, broker/dealer quotes and issuer spreads. At September 30, 2017, our accumulated other comprehensive loss on our balance sheets consisted of net unrealized losses on available-for-sale investments of $14,000 and zero at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.

As of September 30, 2017, all our marketable securities had original maturities of less than two years. The weighted-average maturity of our holdings was four months. None of our marketable securities changed from one fair value hierarchy to another during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017.

~~4. Long-Term Obligation~~

~~As discussed in Note 1,~~ ~~Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, Long-term Obligation~~, under the Financing Agreement with Biopharma we made payments to Biopharma calculated as a percentage of our Korlym revenue. Biopharma’s right to receive payments expired once it received $45.0 million. To secure our obligation, we granted Biopharma a security interest in our patents, trademarks, trade names, domain names, copyrights, know-how, books, records and regulatory

~~CORCEPT THERAPEUTICS INCORPORATED~~

~~NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, continued~~

approvals related to the Covered Products and any proceeds from them. Through September 30, 2017, we paid Biopharma $45.0 million. We extinguished our obligations under the Financing Agreement in July 2017 with a final payment of $4.6 million.

We recorded interest expense of $37,000 and $456,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, respectively, and $455,000 and $1.6 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively and total accreted interest of $15.0 million for the period from August 2012 through September 30, 2017.

~~The following table provides a summary of the payment obligations under the Financing Agreement as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, utilizing the payment assumptions discussed above:~~

September 30,

December 31,

2017

2016

(in thousands)

Total repayment obligation

$
45,000

$
45,000

Less interest in future periods

—

(456
)
Less unamortized financing costs

—

(14
)
Less payments made

(45,000
)

(29,866
)
Less current portion

—

(14,664
)
Long-term obligation, net of current portion

$
—

$
—

We capitalized $140,000 of issuance costs related to the Financing Agreement, which we amortized over the term of the obligation, based on the assumptions discussed above. At September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the unamortized issuance costs were approximately zero and $14,000, respectively, and are included in “long-term obligation,” netted against debt on our balance sheets.

~~5. Commitments and Contingencies~~

~~Leases~~

In February 2016, we extended the lease for our office space through 2019 and added more space. Effective May 1, 2016, we terminated our lease early and replaced it with a new one effective through March 31, 2019. On June 1, 2017, we amended that lease to add more space. Rent expense for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 was $279,000 and $246,000, respectively. Rent expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 was $786,000 and $639,000, respectively.

~~As of September 30, 2017, future minimum lease payments under non-cancelable operating leases were as follows:~~

Lease

Payments

2017 (remainder)

$
264

2018

1,256

2019

314

Thereafter

—

Total

$
1,834

~~Contingencies~~

In the ordinary course of business, we may be subject to legal claims and regulatory actions that could have a material adverse effect on our business or financial position. We assess our potential liability in such situations by analyzing potential outcomes, assuming various litigation, regulatory and settlement strategies. If we determine a loss is probable and its amount can be reasonably estimated, we accrue an amount equal to the estimated loss.

On August 4, 2017, Corcept terminated its pharmaceutical services agreement with Dohmen, dated as of May 21, 2013, as amended July 22, 2013 and again on October 6, 2014 (the “Dohmen Agreement”) for material breach, pursuant to Section 5.2.2 of the Dohmen Agreement. On August 7, 2017, Dohmen filed a complaint in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware against Corcept alleging unlawful termination and breach of contract and requesting declaratory relief and damages (the “Dohmen Lawsuit”). On September 27, 2017, Dohmen amended its complaint to add a claim alleging trade secret misappropriation. In its amended complaint, Dohmen has requested specific performance and an injunction.

~~CORCEPT THERAPEUTICS INCORPORATED~~

~~NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, continued~~

~~Dohmen has refused to transfer to Corcept the cash it collects from $12.9 million in Korlym~~^® net receivables, despite its obligation to do so. Dohmen has instead placed the funds it collects in an escrow account at U.S. Bank (“Escrow Funds”), subject to release by order of the Court or mutual agreement of Dohmen and Corcept~~. As of September 30, 2017, the total amount of these receivables has been included in “Other assets” on our balance sheet.~~

On August 29, 2017, Corcept sued Dohmen in the Superior Court of the State of Delaware alleging fraudulent inducement, negligent misrepresentation, breach of contract, breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing and conversion, and seeking monetary damages and declaratory relief (the “Corcept Lawsuit”). On September 20, 2017, Dohmen removed the Corcept Lawsuit to the United States District Court for the District of Delaware. The parties have agreed to stay proceedings with respect to the Corcept Lawsuit pending the resolution of the Dohmen Lawsuit in the Court of Chancery.

~~We cannot reasonably estimate our possible loss or range of possible losses, if any, in this litigation. Therefore, we have made no provision for a loss contingency.~~

~~6. Stock Option Plans~~

We have two stock option plans – the 2004 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2004 Plan”) and the 2012 Incentive Award Plan (the “2012 Plan”). On February 10, 2017, our Board of Directors authorized a 4.5 million share increase in the shares available for grant under the 2012 Plan.

~~During the nine months ended September 30, 2017, we issued 1,372,000 shares of our common stock upon the exercise of stock options.~~

~~The following table summarizes our stock-based compensation:~~

Three Months Ended

Nine Months Ended

September 30,

September 30,

2017

2016

2017

2016

(in thousands)

(in thousands)

Research and development

$
1,049

$
321

$
2,552

$
879

Selling, general and administrative

2,574

1,510

6,977

4,222

Total stock-based compensation

$
3,623

$
1,831

$
9,529

$
5,101

~~7. Net Income Per Share~~

Basic and diluted net income per share is computed by dividing the net income by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. We used the treasury stock method to determine the number of dilutive shares of common stock resulting from the potential exercise of stock options. The statements of comprehensive income show the computation of net income per share for each period, including the number of weighted-average shares outstanding.

~~CORCEPT THERAPEUTICS INCORPORATED~~

~~NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, continued~~

~~The following table shows the computation of net income per share for each period:~~

Three Months Ended

Nine Months Ended

September 30,

September 30,

2017

2016

2017

2016

(in thousands)

(in thousands)

Numerator:

Net income

$
13,757

$
2,585

$
30,792

$
3,543

Denominator:

Weighted-average shares used to compute basic net income per
share

113,603

110,652

113,242

110,118

Dilutive effect of employee stock options

12,048

5,767

10,175

5,045

Weighted-average shares used to compute diluted net income
per share

125,651

116,419

123,417

115,163

Net income per share attributable to common stockholders

Basic

$
0.12

$
0.02

$
0.27

$
0.03

Diluted

$
0.11

$
0.02

$
0.25

$
0.03

~~On a weighted-average basis,~~ 1.1 million and 3.3 million stock options outstanding during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, respectively, and 4.5 million and 4.6 million stock options outstanding during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively, were excluded from the computation of diluted net income per share because including them would have reduced dilution.

~~The following table presents information on securities outstanding as of the end of each period that could potentially dilute the per share data:~~

September 30,

2017

2016

(in thousands)

Stock options outstanding

20,729

18,570

~~8. Income taxes~~

Our quarterly income taxes reflect our estimated annual effective tax rate. We recorded an income tax benefit of $48,000 and expense of $129,000 during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, respectively, compared to no income tax benefit or expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016. Income tax benefit for the three months ended September 30, 2017 ~~was primarily due to employee stock option activity.~~ ~~Income tax expense for nine months ended September 30, 2017 was primarily due to income tax in~~ ~~states where~~ we ~~did not have net operating loss carryforwards sufficient to offset our taxable income~~.

We have recorded an allowance offsetting the entire value of our net deferred tax assets, consisting primarily of accumulated net operating losses, research and development tax credits, and capitalized research and development expenses. As a result, these assets do not appear on our balance sheet. There is a reasonable possibility that within the next 12 months we will conclude that our future taxable income will be sufficient to allow us to utilize all or some of these assets. In the period we reach that conclusion, we will add to that period’s net income an amount equal to the value of these assets, net of appropriate reserves, and increase our deferred tax assets by a corresponding amount.

~~ITEM 2.~~

~~MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF~~ ~~FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS~~

~~Forward-Looking Statements~~

This Management Discussion should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and accompanying notes in this report. Statements in this section are “forward-looking” within the meaning of the federal securities laws. Forward-looking statements are subject to known and unknown risks and uncertainties that might cause actual results to differ materially from those the statements express or imply. For a discussion of these risks and uncertainties, see “Forward-Looking Statements” included in “Risk Factors” in Part II, Item 1A of this Form 10-Q and the “Overview” and “Liquidity and Capital Resources” sections of this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

~~Overview~~

We are engaged in the discovery, development and commercialization of drugs that treat severe metabolic, oncologic and psychiatric disorders by modulating the effects of the hormone cortisol. Elevated levels and abnormal release patterns of cortisol are implicated in a broad range of diseases. Since our founding in 1998, we have developed mifepristone, a compound that modulates the effects of cortisol by acting as a competitive antagonist at the glucocorticoid receptor (“GR”). We have discovered three structurally distinct series of proprietary, selective cortisol modulators, all of which share mifepristone’s affinity for GR but, unlike mifepristone, do not bind to the progesterone receptor and so do not cause effects associated with antagonism of activity at the progesterone receptor. Pre-clinical and clinical development of compounds from these series are in progress.

~~In 2012, the United States Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) approved Korlym~~^® ~~(mifepristone)~~ 300 mg tablets, as a once-daily oral medication for the treatment of hyperglycemia secondary to hypercortisolism in adult patients with endogenous Cushing’s syndrome who have type 2 diabetes mellitus or glucose intolerance and have failed surgery or are not candidates for surgery. We ~~are conducting two clinical trials~~have discovered and patented 4 structurally distinct series of our proprietary selective cortisol modulator, relacorilant (the recently-approved generic name for the compound CORT125134). We are enrolling patients in a Phase 2 trial of relacorilant to treat Cushing’s syndrome. We are also conducting a Phase 1/2 trial of relacorilant combined with nab-paclitaxel (Celgene Corporation’s drug, Abraxane^®~~) as a treatment for a variety of solid-tumor cancers.~~

~~We have begun clinical development of two of our other~~ selective cortisol modulators, ~~CORT125281~~consisting of more than 1,000 compounds. We are developing compounds from these series as potential treatments for a broad range of serious disorders.

We were incorporated in the State of Delaware in May 1998. Our headquarters are located in Menlo Park, California.

Basis of Presentation

We have prepared the following in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and ~~CORT118335. We plan to develop CORT125281 in combination~~ with the ~~androgen receptor antagonist enzalutamide (Pfizer Inc.’s drug, Xtandi~~^®)instructions to ~~treat patients~~Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X: (i) condensed consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2022 and (ii) condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive income, cash flows and stockholders’ equity for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2022 and 2021. These do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation (which in the applicable periods consist only of normal, recurring adjustments) have been included. Operating results for the three months ended March 31, 2022 are not necessarily indicative of the results for the remainder of 2022 or any other period. These financial statements and notes should be read in conjunction with ~~castration-resistant prostate cancer~~the financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2021 included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K. The December 31, 2021 balance sheet was derived from audited financial statements at that date.

There have been no material changes to the significant accounting policies described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021.

2. Composition of Certain Balance Sheet Items

Inventory


	March 31, 2022		December 31, 2021
	(in thousands)
Work in progress	$	12,637	$	11,450
Finished goods	5,540		6,500
Total inventory	18,177		17,950
Less strategic inventory classified as non-current	(13,098)		(12,962)
Total inventory classified as current	$	5,079	$	4,988

Because we rely on a single manufacturer to produce Korlym’s active pharmaceutical ingredient (“API”), we have purchased and ~~CORT118335~~hold significant quantities of API, included in work in progress inventory. We classify inventory we do not expect to ~~treat patients~~sell within 12 months of the balance sheet date as “Strategic Inventory,” a long-term asset.

Property and equipment


	March 31, 2022		December 31, 2021
	(in thousands)
Furniture and equipment	$	1,169	$	1,157
Software	1,508		1,508
Leasehold improvements	1,262		1,262
Total property and equipment	3,939		3,927
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization	(3,213)		(2,925)
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization	$	726	$	1,002

Accrued and other liabilities


	March 31, 2022		December 31, 2021
	(in thousands)
Government rebates	$	12,377	$	11,174
Accrued income taxes payable	11,523		513
Accrued compensation	4,968		13,339
Legal fees	1,802		842
Accrued selling and marketing costs	861		1,351
Professional fees	652		150
Other	477		296
Total accrued and other liabilities	$	32,660	$	27,665

Other assets

As of March 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, other assets included $2.8 million and $2.9 million of deposits for clinical trials, respectively.

3. Available-for-Sale Securities and Fair Value Measurements

The available-for-sale securities in our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets are as follows:


	March 31, 2022		December 31, 2021
	(in thousands)
Cash equivalents	$	24,266	$	45,088
Short-term marketable securities	283,665		145,918
Long-term marketable securities	22,566		112,277
Total marketable securities	$	330,497	$	303,283

The following table presents our available-for-sale securities grouped by asset type:


	Fair Value Hierarchy Level	March 31, 2022								December 31, 2021
		Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses		Estimated Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses		Estimated Fair Value
		(in thousands)
Corporate bonds	Level 2	$	147,177	$	4	$	(1,023)	$	146,158	$	125,370	$	3	$	(276)	$	125,097
Commercial paper	Level 2	56,751		—		—		56,751		30,963		—		—		30,963
Asset-backed securities	Level 2	29,372		—		(110)		29,262		57,801		—		(67)		57,734
U.S. Treasury securities	Level 1	74,363		—		(303)		74,060		44,473		—		(72)		44,401
Money market funds	Level 1	24,266		—		—		24,266		45,088		—		—		45,088
Total marketable securities		$	331,929	$	4	$	(1,436)	$	330,497	$	303,695	$	3	$	(415)	$	303,283

We estimate the fair value of marketable securities classified as Level 1 using quoted market prices for these or identical investments obtained from a commercial pricing service. We estimate the fair value of marketable securities classified as Level 2 using inputs that may include benchmark yields, reported trades, broker/dealer quotes and issuer spreads.

We periodically review our debt securities to determine if any of our investments is impaired due to credit-related or other issues. If the fair value of our investment in any debt security is less than our amortized cost basis, we determine whether an allowance for credit losses is appropriate by assessing quantitative and subjective factors including, but not limited to, the nature of security, changes in credit ratings, analyst reports concerning the security’s issuer and industry, interest rate fluctuations and general market conditions.

As of March 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, unrealized losses on our available-for-sale debt securities were $1.4 million and $0.4 million, respectively.

All of our investments, including those with ~~non-alcoholic fatty liver disease~~unrealized losses, are not impaired. Unrealized losses on our investments are due to interest rate fluctuations. We do not intend to sell investments that currently have unrealized losses and ~~antipsychotic-induced weight gain.~~

~~Cushing’s Syndrome~~

~~Background. Cushing’s syndrome~~it is ~~caused~~highly unlikely that we will sell any investment before recovery of its amortized cost basis, which may be at maturity. Accordingly, we have not recorded an allowance for credit losses associated with these investments.

We classified accrued interest on our marketable securities of $1.0 million and $1.4 million as of March 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively, as prepaid and other current assets on our condensed consolidated balance sheets.

As of March 31, 2022, all our marketable securities had original maturities of less than two years. The weighted-average maturity of our holdings was seven months. As of March 31, 2022, our long-term marketable securities had remaining maturities ranging from 12 to 24 months. None of our marketable securities changed from one fair value hierarchy to another during the three months ended March 31, 2022.

4. Commitments and Contingencies

There have been no material changes in our obligations under contractual agreements described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021.

outcomes under various litigation, regulatory and settlement strategies. If we determine a loss is probable and its amount can be reasonably estimated, we accrue an amount equal to the estimated loss.

NaN losses and 0 provision for a loss contingency have been recorded to date.

5. Leases

We lease our office facilities in Menlo Park, California. In March 2022, we amended our lease to extend its term from March 31, 2022 to June 30, 2023. As a result of this amendment, we recognized an additional right-of-use asset and corresponding lease liability of $2.8 million. The right-of-use asset and lease liability recognized equals the present value of the remaining payments due under our amended lease.

As the operating lease for our facilities does not include an expressly stated interest rate, we calculated the present value of remaining lease payments using a discount rate equal to the interest rate we would pay on a collateralized loan with monthly payments and a term equal to the monthly payments and remaining term of our lease. We recognize operating lease payments as expenses using the straight-line method over the term of the lease.

Operating lease expense for each of the three months ended March 31, 2022 and 2021 was approximately $0.5 million.

Our right-of-use assets and related lease liabilities were as follows (in thousands, except weighted average amounts):


	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2022			2021
Cash paid for operating lease liabilities	$	530		$	514
Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for new operating lease obligations	$	2,816		$	—
Weighted-average remaining lease term	15 months			12 months
Weighted-average discount rate	4.0		%	4.8		%

As of March 31, 2022, future minimum lease payments under non-cancelable operating leases were as follows (in thousands):


2022 (remainder)	$	1,735
2023	1,157
Total lease payments	2,892
Less imputed interest	(76)
Present value of operating lease liabilities	$	2,816

6. Stockholders’ Equity

Incentive Award Plan

We have 1 stock option plan – the ~~prolonged exposure~~2012 Incentive Award Plan (the “2012 Plan”). In December 2021, our Board of Directors authorized a 4.2 million increase in the shares available for grant under the 2012 Plan.

Stock Options

During the three months ended March 31, 2022, we issued 0.6 million shares of our common stock upon the exercise of stock options. Certain option holders exercised their options on a “net exercise” basis, pursuant to which they surrendered to us, and we purchased from them at the current market price, enough shares to cover the exercise price and tax withholding obligations arising from the exercise. During the three months ended March 31, 2022, we purchased 0.3 million shares in connection with such option net exercises. In connection with the shares purchased, during the three months ended March 31, 2022, we paid $1.9 million to satisfy associated tax withholding obligations.

During the three months ended March 31, 2021, we issued 1.8 million shares of our common stock upon the exercise of stock options. We purchased 0.8 million shares in connection with option net exercises, at a total cost of $16.4 million, to satisfy associated tax withholding obligations.

We recorded purchased shares as treasury stock on our condensed consolidated balance sheets at cost. As of March 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, we had 21.6 million and 21.3 million treasury shares outstanding, respectively.

Restricted Stock Units (“RSUs”)

During the three months ended March 31, 2022, we granted employees 0.2 million RSUs with a weighted-average grant date fair value of $19.34 per share. No RSUs vested during the period.

Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”)

In February 2022 we adopted an ESPP that allows employees to set aside, by means of payroll deductions, up to ten percent of their annual compensation for the purchase of our commons stock. Shares are issued to participating employees from the 2012 Plan on March 1st and September 1st of each year (or, if those dates fall on holidays, on the first business day thereafter) at the then-current fair market value of our stock, as determined at the close of trading on those days. Payroll deductions for participating employees began April 1, 2022, and the first purchase under the plan will take place on September 1, 2022.

For each purchased share held for one year, the purchasing employee will receive one matching share, also issued from the 2012 Plan, net of any applicable tax withholding. There is no vesting requirement with respect to shares issued pursuant to the ESPP. Shares purchased pursuant to the ESPP as well as any matching shares issued upon satisfaction of the ~~body’s tissues to high levels~~one-year holding requirement may be held, sold or otherwise transferred at the employee’s sole discretion.

Stock-based Compensation

Stock-based compensation expense associated with stock options and awards of restricted stock is measured at the grant date based on the fair value of the ~~stress~~award, and is recognized, net of forfeitures, as expense over the remaining requisite service period on a straight-line basis.

The Company values restricted stock at the closing market price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant.

The following table summarizes our stock-based compensation by account:


	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2022		2021
	(in thousands)
Stock-based compensation capitalized in inventory	$	64	$	41
Cost of sales	16		10
Research and development	3,371		3,505
Selling, general and administrative	7,374		6,586
Total stock-based compensation	$	10,825	$	10,142

7. Net Income Per Share

We compute basic and diluted net income per share by dividing our net income by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period, including potentially dilutive stock options and RSUs. We use the treasury stock method to determine the number of dilutive shares of common stock resulting from stock options and restricted stock.

The following table shows the computation of net income per share for each period:


	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2022		2021
	(in thousands)
Numerator:
Net income	$	22,797	$	23,465
Denominator:
Weighted-average shares used to compute basic net income per share	106,012		116,818
Dilutive effect of employee stock options and restricted stock	9,025		12,850
Weighted-average shares used to compute diluted net income per share	115,037		129,668
Net income per share
Basic	$	0.22	$	0.20
Diluted	$	0.20	$	0.18

As of March 31, 2022, we had 26.0 million stock options and 0.2 million RSUs outstanding. As of March 31, 2021, we had 26.8 million stock options outstanding.

We excluded from the computation of diluted net income per share, on a weighted-average basis, 6.9 million stock options and RSUs outstanding during the three months ended March 31, 2022 and 2.4 million stock options outstanding during the three months ended March 31, 2021, because including them would have reduced dilution.

8. Income Taxes

We recorded income tax expense of $4.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2022, and an income tax benefit of $3.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2021. The increase in income tax expense during the three months ended March 31, 2022 was primarily due to increased income before income taxes and decreased excess tax deductions from stock-based compensation as compared to the corresponding period in 2021.

Our effective tax rate differs from the federal statutory rate due to state income taxes and the non-deductible portion of our stock-based compensation, which increased our tax expense, offset by tax benefits for research and development tax credits and the excess tax deduction arising from the exercise of employee stock options, which reduced our taxable income.

During the three months ended March 31, 2022, unrecognized tax benefits increased by $0.4 million. As of March 31, 2022, the Company had unrecognized tax benefits of $7.7 million that, if recognized, would affect the Company’s effective tax rate and approximately $1.9 million of unrecognized tax benefits that would not impact the effective tax rate as they would be offset by a corresponding change in valuation allowance.

Each quarter, we assess the likelihood that we will generate sufficient taxable income to make use of our federal and state deferred tax assets. If we believe that recovery of these deferred tax assets is not more likely than not, we establish a valuation allowance offsetting such assets on our balance sheet. Significant judgment is required in assessing the need for a valuation allowance. We consider all available evidence, including our recent operating results and our forecasts of future taxable income. Other than valuation allowances against our California net deferred tax assets, we have determined that it is more likely than not we will realize the benefit related to all other deferred tax assets. To the extent we increase a valuation allowance, we will include an expense in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income in the period in which such determination is made.

Beginning in 2022, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (“TCJA”) eliminates the right to deduct research and development expenditures for tax purposes in the period the expenses were incurred and instead requires all U.S. and foreign research and development expenditures to be amortized over five and fifteen tax years, respectively. Although Congress is considering legislation that would defer the amortization requirement to later years, it is not certain that the provision will be repealed or otherwise modified. As of March 31, 2022, the requirement has not been modified. We have capitalized our research and development expenses, which caused our taxes payable to increase to $11.5 million as of March 31, 2022, compared to $0.5 million as of December 31, 2021.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT��S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”) is intended to help the reader understand our results of operations and financial condition and is provided as a supplement to, and should be read in conjunction with our condensed consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes to financial statements, risk factors and other disclosures included in this Form 10-Q. Our condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“U.S. GAAP”).

We make statements in this section that are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. For a complete discussion of such forward-looking statements and the potential risks and uncertainties that may affect their accuracy, see the “Risk Factors” section of this Form 10-Q and the “Overview” and “Liquidity and Capital Resources” sections of this MD&A.

Overview

We are a commercial-stage company engaged in the discovery and development of drugs that treat severe endocrine, metabolic, oncologic, and neurological disorders by modulating the effects of the hormone cortisol. Cushing’s syndrome is relatively uncommon and most often affects adults aged 20 to 50. An estimated 10 to 15 of every one million people are newly diagnosed with this syndrome each year, resulting in approximately 3,000 new patients and about 20,000 patients with Cushing’s syndrome in the United States, approximately half of whom are cured by surgery.

Since 2012, we have marketed Korlym ~~to Treat Patients with Cushing’s Syndrome. We have received Orphan Drug designation from the FDA for Korlym~~(mifepristone) for the treatment of patients ~~with endogenous~~suffering from Cushing’s syndrome. ~~Orphan Drugs receive seven years~~Our portfolio of ~~marketing exclusivity for the approved indication from the date~~proprietary selective cortisol modulators consists of ~~drug approval, as well as tax credits for clinical trial costs, marketing application filing fee waivers and assistance from the FDA in the drug development process.~~

~~We first made~~ four structurally distinct series totaling more than 1,000 compounds.

Cushing’s Syndrome

Korlym ~~available to patients commercially in April 2012.~~. We sell Korlym in the United States, using experienced clinical sales representatives ~~who target the endocrinologists~~to call on physicians caring for patients with endogenous Cushing’s ~~syndrome. We also reach patients directly through web-based initiatives and interactions with patient groups.~~syndrome (hypercortisolism). Because many people who suffer from Cushing’s syndrome ~~can remain~~are undiagnosed or be inadequately treated, we have developed and continue to refine and expand programs to educate physicians and patients about ~~diagnosis of this syndrome~~screening for hypercortisolism and the role ~~cortisol modulators~~Korlym can play in treating patients with the ~~disease. In addition, we~~disorder. We also have a field-based force of medical science liaisons.

We use aone specialty pharmacy and aone specialty distributor to distribute Korlym and provide logistical ~~support. We donate money~~support to ~~independent charitable foundations. These organizations, along with our own programs, help us ensure~~physicians and patients. Our policy is that no patient with Cushing’s syndrome iswill be denied access to Korlym for financial reasons.

~~Relacorilant (CORT125134)~~ To help us achieve that goal, we fund our own patient support programs and donate money to ~~Treat Patients with~~independent charitable foundations that help patients pay for all aspects of their Cushing’s ~~Syndrome~~syndrome care, whether or not that care includes taking Korlym.

Relacorilant. We are ~~enrolling patients in a~~conducting two Phase ~~2 trial~~3 trials (named GRACE and GRADIENT) of our proprietary, selective cortisol modulator, relacorilant, ~~to treat patients with Cushing’s syndrome. Relacorilant shares Korlym’s affinity for GR. Data from relacorilant’s Phase 1 trial showed that it can prevent the effects of the steroid prednisone,~~as a ~~commonly-used synthetic GR agonist, on serum osteocalcin, white blood cell counts, glucose metabolism and expression of the FKBP5 gene – a~~

~~marker of GR activation. Modulating the effect of prednisone is important because it is a strong surrogate for modulation of the natural hormone cortisol – the essential quality of an effective~~ treatment for patients with Cushing’s syndrome. ~~Unlike~~Relacorilant was well-tolerated in its Phase 1 and Phase 2 trials. Patients in the Phase 2 trial exhibited meaningful improvements in glucose control, hypertension, weight, liver function, coagulopathy, cognition, mood, insulin resistance and quality of life measures. Relacorilant shares Korlym’s affinity for the glucocorticoid receptor (“GR”), but, unlike Korlym, ~~relacorilant~~ has no affinity for the progesterone ~~receptor.~~

~~We have developed~~receptor (“PR”), and so is not the “abortion pill” and does not cause the effects associated with the PR affinity, including endometrial thickening and vaginal bleeding. Relacorilant also does not appear to cause hypokalemia (low potassium), a ~~CLIA-validated assay to measure FKBP5 gene expression~~potentially serious adverse event that ~~we believe will enable physicians to more easily~~ ~~identify new~~is a leading cause of patients stopping treatment with Korlym. Forty-four percent of patients in Korlym’s pivotal trial experienced hypokalemia.

In the GRACE trial, each patient receives relacorilant for 22 weeks. Patients who exhibit pre-specified improvements in hypertension and/or glucose metabolism enter a 12-week, double-blind, “randomized withdrawal” phase, in which half of the patients continue receiving relacorilant and half receive placebo. The trial’s primary endpoint is the rate and degree of relapse in patients receiving placebo measured against the rate and degree of relapse in those continuing relacorilant. GRACE has a planned enrollment of 130 patients with ~~hypercortisolism~~Cushing’s syndrome at sites in the United States, Canada, Europe and ~~better treat~~Israel. If successful, we expect GRACE to provide the basis for a new drug application (“NDA”) for relacorilant as a treatment for patients ~~already~~with any etiology of endogenous Cushing’s syndrome.

Our second Phase 3 trial of relacorilant, GRADIENT, is studying patients whose Cushing’s syndrome is caused by a benign adrenal tumor. These patients often exhibit less severe symptoms or have a more gradual course of disease than patients with other etiologies of Cushing’s syndrome, although their health outcomes are ultimately poor. Half of the patients in GRADIENT will receive relacorilant for 26 weeks and half will receive placebo. The trial’s primary endpoints are improvements in glucose metabolism and hypertension. The planned enrollment for this study is 130 patients. Many of the clinical sites in GRACE are participating in GRADIENT.

The United States Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) and the European Commission (“EC”) have designated relacorilant as an orphan drug for the treatment of Cushing’s syndrome. In the United States, relacorilant’s orphan designation confers tax credits, reduced regulatory fees and, provided we obtain approval for the treatment of patients with Cushing’s syndrome, seven years of exclusive marketing rights. Benefits of orphan drug designation by the EC are similar, but also include protocol assistance from the European Medicines Agency (“EMA”), access to the centralized marketing authorization procedure in the European Union (“EU”) and, if we obtain approval, ten years of exclusive marketing rights in the EU for the treatment of patients with Cushing’s syndrome.

Oncology

There is substantial in vitro, in vivo and clinical evidence that cortisol’s activity allows certain solid tumors to resist treatment. In some cancers, cortisol retards cellular apoptosis – the tumor-killing effect many treatments are meant to stimulate. In other cancers, cortisol activity promotes tumor growth. Cortisol also suppresses the body’s immune response; activating – not suppressing – the immune system is beneficial in fighting certain cancers. Modulating cortisol’s activity may help existing anti-cancer treatments achieve their ~~care.~~

~~Oncology~~

intended effect. Many ~~tumor~~ types of solid tumors express the GR, and are potential targets for cortisol modulation therapy, among them ~~triple-negative breast,~~ ovarian, ~~castration-resistant~~adrenal and prostate ~~cervical, and pancreatic cancers, as well as sarcoma and melanoma.~~

cancer.

Relacorilant ~~to Treat~~in Patients with ~~Solid-Tumors~~. We are conducting a Phase 1/2 trial of Abraxane in combination with relacorilant to treat solid-tumors. Once we identify a recommended dose, we will open expansion cohorts to test the combination’s efficacy in a variety of tumor types. We plan to open the first cohort in the fourth quarter of 2017, enrolling patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. We continue to explore opening cohorts in patients with other solid-tumors, including metastatic triple-negative breast and ovarian cancer.

~~We may also evaluate relacorilant in combination with other cancer therapies, including immunotherapy, to treat solid tumors.~~

~~Korlym to Treat Patients with Triple-Negative Breast~~Advanced Ovarian Cancer ~~(“TNBC”)~~. In ~~December 2016,~~May 2021, we announced ~~the~~preliminary results offrom our ~~Phase 1/2 trial of Korlym in combination with eribulin (Eisai Inc.’s drug, Halaven~~^®) to treat patients with metastatic TNBC. The trial studied 21 patients with GR-positive tumors, one with GR-negative tumors and one with tumors whose GR status was not known. As determined using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (“RECIST”), efficacy results were as follows: four patients exhibited a partial response, defined as a 30 percent or greater reduction in tumor size; eight had stable disease; and 11 had progressive disease. Six patients achieved progression-free survival (“PFS”) longer than the upper bound of the 95% confidence interval for PFS (15 weeks) in patients receiving Halaven^® monotherapy in a comparable population (Aogi et al., Annals of Oncology 23: 1441-1448, 2012). Median PFS in the trial was 11.1 weeks – compared to 7.2 weeks in the Halaven monotherapy study reported by Aogi.

~~We believe the addition of Korlym to chemotherapy warrants further study. University of Chicago investigators are leading a 64-patient double-blind, placebo-controlled,~~178-patient, controlled, multi-center, Phase 2 trial of ~~Korlym~~relacorilant combined with ~~Abraxane~~nab-paclitaxel in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. Study participants were randomized to one of three treatment arms: 60 women received 150 mg of relacorilant intermittently (the day before, the day of and the day after their weekly nab-paclitaxel infusion) and 58 women received a daily relacorilant dose of 100 mg per day in addition to nab-paclitaxel. Sixty women received nab-paclitaxel alone. The trial’s primary endpoint was progression-free survival (“PFS”).

Patients in both of the relacorilant plus nab-paclitaxel treatment arms experienced longer PFS than did the patients who received nab-paclitaxel alone. Patients who received a higher dose of relacorilant intermittently exhibited a statistically significant improvement in median PFS (5.6 months versus 3.8 months, hazard ratio: 0.66; p-value: <0.038). Patients who received a lower dose of relacorilant daily exhibited a median PFS that was 1.5 months longer than did the patients who received nab-paclitaxel alone (5.3 months versus 3.8 months, hazard ratio: 0.83; p-value: not significant). Patients who received relacorilant intermittently also had a longer median duration of response (“DoR”) (5.6 months versus 3.7 months, hazard ratio: 0.36; p-value: 0.006) compared to those who received nab-paclitaxel alone.

In March 2022, we announced overall survival (“OS”) data from this trial. OS was assessed after a pre-determined number of patient deaths had occurred. At the time of database cutoff, 128 of the 178 patients who enrolled in the study had died. Patients who received relacorilant intermittently lived longer (median OS: 13.9 months versus 12.2 months, hazard ratio: 0.67; p-value: 0.066) compared to those who received nab-paclitaxel alone.

As is typical of late-stage clinical trials, Corcept’s upcoming Phase 3 trial will exclude patients with either primary platinum-refractory disease or who have already received four or more prior lines of therapy, both indicators of a very poor prognosis. Excluding such patients, women in the intermittent arm experienced significantly improved PFS (median PFS: 5.6 months versus 3.8 months, hazard ratio: 0.58; p-value: 0.016) and OS relative to patients in the comparator arm (median OS: 13.9 months versus 12.2 months, hazard ratio: 0.52; p-value: 0.010). The patients in the intermittent arm also experienced a significant improvement in DoR relative to those in the comparator arm (median DoR: 5.6 months versus 3.6 months, hazard ratio: 0.26; p-value: 0.001).

Safety and tolerability of relacorilant plus nab-paclitaxel were comparable to nab-paclitaxel monotherapy. Based on these positive results, we plan to initiate a pivotal Phase 3 trial in the second quarter of 2022.

Relacorilant in Patients with Adrenal Cancer with Cortisol Excess. We are conducting an open-label, Phase 1b trial of relacorilant plus the PD-1 checkpoint inhibitor pembrolizumab in 20 patients with metastatic or unresectable adrenal cancer whose tumors produce cortisol. The trial is examining whether adding relacorilant to pembrolizumab therapy reduces cortisol-activated immune suppression sufficiently to help pembrolizumab achieve its intended tumor-killing effect. Relacorilant is also expected to treat ~~patients with TNBC. Celgene is funding~~ the ~~trial. We are providing Korlym.~~

~~Cortisol Modulators to Treat~~patients’ Cushing's syndrome generated by their tumors’ excess production of cortisol.

Exicorilant and Relacorilant in Patients with Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (“CRPC”). ~~Because~~Androgen deprivation is the standard treatment for metastatic prostate cancer because androgens stimulate prostate tumor ~~growth, androgen-deprivation is a common treatment for metastatic prostate cancer.~~growth. Tumors ~~eventually~~often escape ~~androgen-deprivation~~androgen deprivation therapy ~~including antagonism of~~when cortisol’s activity at the ~~androgen receptor, through the proliferation of cells for which~~ ~~cortisol’s stimulation of~~ GR ~~is the primary growth factor.~~supplants androgen’s in stimulating tumor growth. Combining a cortisol modulator with an androgen modulator ~~such as Xtandi~~ may block this escape route.

University of Chicago investigators are leading an 84-patient, controlled, multicenter Phase 2 study of Korlym combined with Xtandi to treat patients with metastatic CRPC. The Department of Defense and the Prostate Cancer Foundation are funding the trial. Pfizer is providing Xtandi. We are ~~providing Korlym~~.

~~We have begun~~conducting a ~~Phase 1~~dose-finding trial ~~in healthy subjects~~ of our proprietary, selective cortisol modulator ~~CORT125281. In the fourth quarter of this year, we will begin a dose-ranging trial of CORT125281 combined~~exicorilant in combination with ~~Xtandi to treat~~enzalutamide in patients with metastatic CRPC.

~~We have exclusively licensed patents from~~ Investigators at the University of Chicago ~~covering the use~~are conducting a dose-finding trial of ~~cortisol modulators~~relacorilant combined with ~~anticancer agents~~enzalutamide in the same patient population.

Metabolic Diseases

Antipsychotic-Induced Weight Gain (“AIWG”). In the United States, six million people take antipsychotic medications such as olanzapine and risperidone to treat ~~TNBC~~illnesses such as schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and ~~with androgen deprivation agents~~depression. While these drugs are very effective, they often cause rapid and sustained weight gain, other metabolic disturbances and, ultimately, cardiovascular disease. Patients taking these medications experience a 10 to ~~treat CRPC.~~

~~Our Other Selective Cortisol Modulators~~

~~Relacorilant, CORT125281~~25-year reduction in life expectancy, due in large part to increased cardiovascular events, such as heart attacks and ~~CORT118335~~strokes. We are ~~the leading compounds in~~studying our ~~portfolio of proprietary~~ selective cortisol ~~modulators,~~modulator miricorilant as a potential treatment for AIWG.

In 2020, we completed a double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase 1b trial, in which ~~consists~~96 healthy subjects received daily doses of ~~more~~the antipsychotic medication olanzapine (10 mg) and either miricorilant (600 mg or 900 mg) or placebo for 14 days. Study participants who received miricorilant gained less weight than ~~500 compounds~~subjects receiving placebo. In addition, markers of liver damage that rise temporarily at the start of olanzapine therapy increased less sharply in ~~three structurally distinct families. All~~subjects receiving miricorilant. The results of ~~these compounds potently block GR but not~~this study were published in the ~~progesterone, estrogen or androgen receptors. Many~~Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology (Hunt et al., 2021) and are consistent with the findings of similar studies we conducted in healthy volunteers using mifepristone (published in Advances in Therapy and Obesity in 2009 and 2010).

Based on these ~~compounds have demonstrated~~ positive results in ~~animal~~healthy subjects and compelling pre-clinical data, we are conducting two double-blind, placebo-controlled, Phase 2 trials of miricorilant – GRATITUDE and GRATITUDE II.

GRATITUDE is evaluating whether a daily dose of miricorilant (600 mg) can reverse recent AIWG. Study participants receive their established antipsychotic medication plus either miricorilant or placebo for 12 weeks. GRATITUDE has enrolled patients with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder and is being conducted at 30 sites in ~~vitro models of cortisol modulation.~~ the United States.

GRATITUDE II is evaluating whether miricorilant can reverse long-standing AIWG. Study participants receive their established antipsychotic medication plus either miricorilant (600 mg or 900 mg daily) or placebo for 26 weeks. GRATITUDE II has enrolled patients with schizophrenia and is being conducted at 35 centers in the United States.

The primary endpoint in both the GRATITUDE and GRATITUDE II trials is the change in body weight from baseline, relative to placebo. Other important metabolic endpoints are also being measured. Both trials have completed enrollment.

Liver Disease. We are ~~advancing~~studying miricorilant as a potential treatment for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (“NASH”). In April 2021, we suspended our Phase 2a trial after observing elevated liver enzymes in four of the ~~most promising~~five patients who received miricorilant, which resolved after miricorilant was withdrawn. The patients with elevated liver enzymes also exhibited large, rapid reductions in liver fat. We are conducting a Phase 1b dose-finding trial in patients with presumed NASH to see if an alternative miricorilant dosing regimen can capture this benefit without causing excessive liver irritation.

Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (“ALS”)

We have completed our Phase 1 trial of ~~them towards the clinic~~.

~~The United States Patent & Trademark Office has issued us nine composition of matter patents covering~~ our selective cortisol ~~modulators~~modulator dazucorilant, which has shown promise in animal models of ALS. We plan to advance it to Phase 2 as a potential treatment for ALS.

COVID-19 Pandemic

Much of the world is subject to varying degrees of pandemic-related public health restrictions, including California, where we are headquartered, and ~~21 method~~in the jurisdictions where our vendors are located and where we sell Korlym and conduct clinical trials.

These restrictions, as well as measures voluntarily undertaken by patients, physicians, hospitals and medical clinics, have reduced our revenue and make it difficult to grow our Korlym business.

The pandemic’s impact on the pace of ~~use patents covering~~our clinical development programs has been variable. Our trials of indications not considered immediately life-threatening, such as Cushing’s syndrome, CRPC and AIWG have experienced slower enrollment. In addition, some clinical sites have stopped enrolling new patients or have reduced the ~~use~~frequency with which physicians see study participants. Some sites have suspended or halted the initiation of ~~cortisol modulators~~new clinical trials. Our trials in patients with immediately life-threatening diseases, such as advanced pancreatic and ovarian cancer, did not encounter delays.

We expect that pandemic-related impediments to ~~treat a wide range of serious disorders.~~ We have exclusively licensed three U.S. method of use patents from Stanford University and five method of use patents from the University of Chicago. We also own an extensive portfolio of patents in countries around the world. We have applied, andour business will continue so long as there are COVID-19 public health restrictions and/or risk-reducing behavior by physicians and patients.

Please see the risk factor under Item 1A of this Quarterly Report, “The COVID-19 pandemic has adversely affected and is continuing to ~~apply, for U.S.~~adversely affect our business. Other public health emergencies, natural disasters, terrorism or other

catastrophes could disrupt our activities and ~~foreign patents covering the composition~~render our own or our vendors’ facilities and ~~method of use of our product candidates.~~

equipment inoperable or inaccessible and require us to curtail or cease operations.”

Results of Operations

Net Product Revenue–Net product revenue is gross product revenue from sales to our customers less deductions for estimated government ~~rebates.~~

rebates and chargebacks.

Net product revenue was ~~$42.8 million and $105.9~~$93.7 million for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2017, respectively, as~~March 31, 2022, compared to ~~$21.7~~$79.4 million ~~and $57.5 million~~for the comparable period in 2021. For the ~~corresponding periods in 2016. These increases were driven by the increase in our~~three months ended March 31, 2022, higher sales ~~volume as well as a price increase in January 2017. This price increase represented approximately 7.2 percent and 7.7~~volumes accounted for 53.6 percent of the ~~increases~~increases. Increases in ~~revenue~~the average price of Korlym accounted for the ~~three~~remaining growth due to price increases effective January 1, 2022 and ~~nine months ended September 30, 2017, respectively.~~

March 1, 2021.

Cost of sales–Cost of sales includes the cost of API, tableting, packaging, personnel, overhead, stability testing and distribution.

Cost of sales was ~~$976,000 and $2.4~~$1.3 million for ~~the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, respectively, compared to $668,000 and $1.5 million for the corresponding periods in 2016. For~~ each of the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2017, cost of sales was 2.3 percent of net product revenue, compared to 3.1 percent~~March 31, 2022 and ~~2.6 percent in the corresponding periods of 2016.~~ 2021. Cost of sales as a percentage of revenue ~~declined~~was 1.3 percent and 1.6 percent for the three months ended March 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. The decrease in ~~both periods~~cost of sales as a percentage of revenue was due to reduced manufacturing ~~costs and increases in the price of Korlym. The dollar value of our cost of sales increased in both periods due to greater sales volumes.~~

costs.

Research and development ~~expenses~~expense – Research and development ~~expenses include~~expense includes the cost of (1) ~~retaining~~recruiting and compensating development personnel, (2) third-party costs for clinical trials, (3) ~~discovery research and pre-clinical studies, (4)~~ drug product ~~for use~~and preclinical studies in support of clinical trials and ~~to support~~ regulatory submissions, (4) discovery research and (5) the development of drug formulations and manufacturing ~~processes and (6) regulatory activities~~.

processes.

Research and development ~~expenses increased 65.8 percent to $11.7~~expense was $28.1 million for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2017~~March 31, 2022, compared to ~~$7.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2016.~~ ~~Research and development expenses increased 54.1 percent to $26.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 from $17.4~~$29.0 million for the comparable period in ~~2016. These increases were~~ 2021. The decrease was primarily due ~~primarily~~ to reduced spending on our Phase 2 trial in ovarian cancer and our Phase 3 trial in pancreatic cancer, as patients completed their time on study, partially offset by increased spending on employee recruiting and compensation expenses and the advancement of ~~relacorilant~~our other development programs.


	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2022		2021
	(in thousands)
Development programs:
Oncology	$	3,823	$	5,959
Cushing’s syndrome	7,107		7,634
Metabolic diseases	5,377		5,951
Pre-clinical and early-stage selective cortisol modulators	5,306		4,096
Unallocated activities, including manufacturing and regulatory activities	3,136		1,877
Stock-based compensation	3,371		3,505
Total research and development expense	$	28,120	$	29,022

It is difficult to predict the timing and ~~the hiring~~cost of ~~additional clinical~~ development ~~employees.~~

~~Below is a summary of our research~~activities, which are subject to many uncertainties and ~~development expenses by major project:~~

Three Months Ended

Nine Months Ended

September 30,

September 30,

2017

2016

2017

2016

Project

(in thousands)

(in thousands)

Development programs:

Oncology

$
1,904

$
1,127

$
4,483

$
3,625

Cushing's syndrome

4,066

891

7,450

2,496

Pre-clinical selective cortisol modulators

3,278

3,904

8,678

7,487

Unallocated activities, including pre-clinical, manufacturing and
regulatory activities

1,396

811

3,582

2,873

Stock-based compensation

1,049

321

2,552

879

Total research and development expense

$
11,693

$
7,054

$
26,745

$
17,360

~~Research and development expenses in 2017 and thereafter will depend on the outcomes of our pre-clinical and clinical trials and our development plans~~. ~~We expect research and development spending for the rest of 2017 to be higher than it was in the corresponding period of 2016 as our research and development programs advance and we begin new ones~~.

~~Many factors affect the cost and timing of pre-clinical and clinical programs,~~risks, including inconclusive or negative results, slow patient enrollment, adverse side effects ~~unforeseen~~and difficulties in the formulation or manufacture of study drugs and ~~their real or perceived~~ lack of ~~efficacy or safety. Clinical~~drug-candidate efficacy. In addition, clinical development is ~~also~~ subject to ~~extensive~~ government ~~regulation. These factors make it difficult~~oversight and regulations that may change without notice. We expect our research and development expense to ~~predict~~be higher in 2022 than in 2021 as our clinical programs advance. Research and development spending in future years will depend on the ~~timing~~outcome of our pre-clinical and ~~cost of~~clinical trials and our development ~~activities.~~

plans.

Selling, general and administrative ~~expenses~~ expense –Selling, general and administrative ~~expenses include~~expense includes (1) compensation of employees, consultants and contractors engaged in commercial and administrative activities, (2) the cost of vendors ~~that support~~supporting commercial activities and (3) legal and accounting ~~fees~~.

fees.

Selling, general and administrative ~~expenses~~expense was $37.5 million for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2017 increased 50.7 percent,~~March 31, 2022, compared to ~~$16.5 million, from $10.9 million for the comparable period of 2016. Selling, general and administrative expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 increased 36.3 percent, to $45.6 million, from $33.5~~$29.5 million for the comparable period in ~~2016. These increases were primarily~~2021. The increase was due to ~~the growth of our~~increased employee compensation expenses, legal fees, and sales ~~organization~~ and ~~increased professional services fees.~~

marketing expenses.

We expect our selling, general and administrative ~~expenses~~expense to be higher in ~~the remainder of 2017~~2022 than in ~~the corresponding period of 2016~~2021 due to ~~the~~ increased ~~scope of our~~ commercial ~~activities. Selling, general~~ and administrative activities, including litigation and administrative support for ~~the rest of 2017~~increased research and ~~future years will depend on the cost of our commercial~~development and ~~clinical development~~marketing efforts.

Interest and other income ~~(expense)~~–Interest and other income ~~(expense) for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 consisted of income of $86,000 and expense of $237,000, respectively, compared to expense of $487,000 and $1.6~~was $0.1 million for the corresponding periods in 2016. In the three months ended September 30, 2017, interest and other income consisted of interest income from marketable securities. In all other periods, these amounts primarily consisted of interest expense related to the Biopharma Financing Agreement. There will be no interest expense for the remainder of 2017 due to the retirement of the Financing Agreement in July 2017.

~~Income tax benefit (expense)~~ – ~~Income tax benefit (expense) for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 was $48,000 and ($129,000), respectively.~~ ~~Income tax benefit~~ for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2017~~March 31, 2022, compared to $0.3 million for the comparable period in 2021. The decrease in interest and other income was due to a lower cash and investments balance.

Income tax (expense) benefit –Income tax expense was $4.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2022, compared to an income tax benefit of $3.6 million for the comparable period in 2021. The change was primarily due to ~~employee stock option activity. Income~~an increase in income before income taxes and a decrease in excess tax ~~expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 was for states where~~ we ~~did not have net operating loss carryforwards sufficient~~deductions from stock-based compensation as compared to ~~offset our taxable income.~~ ~~We had no income tax benefit (expense) for~~ the corresponding period in ~~2016.~~

~~Non-GAAP Financial Measures~~

We prepare our financial statements and footnotes in accordance with GAAP. We supplement these with non-GAAP measures of net income and net income per share that exclude non-cash expenses related to stock-based compensation expense and the accretion of interest expense under the Financing Agreement. We use these non-GAAP measures to manage our business and believe that they may help investors better evaluate our past financial performance and potential future results. Non-GAAP measures should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for comparable GAAP accounting and investors should read them in conjunction with our financial statements and notes thereto prepared in accordance with GAAP. The non-GAAP measures of net income and net income per share we use may be different from, and not directly comparable to, similarly titled measures used by other companies.

2021.

Three Months Ended

Nine Months Ended

September 30,

September 30,

2017

2016

2017

2016

(in thousands, except for per share data)

GAAP net income

$
13,757

$
2,585

$
30,792

$
3,543

Non-cash expenses:

Stock-based compensation

3,623

1,831

9,529

5,101

Accretion of interest expense related to long-term obligation

37

455

456

1,562

Non-GAAP net income, as adjusted for non-cash expenses

$
17,417

$
4,871

$
40,777

$
10,206

Basic net income per share

$
0.12

$
0.02

$
0.27

$
0.03

Diluted net income per share

$
0.11

$
0.02

$
0.25

$
0.03

Non-GAAP basic net income per share, as
   adjusted for non-cash expenses

$
0.15

$
0.04

$
0.36

$
0.09

Non-GAAP diluted net income per share, as
   adjusted for non-cash expenses

$
0.14

$
0.04

$
0.33

$
0.09

Weighted-average shares outstanding shares used in computing
   net income per share

Basic

113,603

110,652

113,242

110,118

Diluted

125,651

116,419

123,417

115,163

Liquidity and Capital Resources

~~Until 2016, we incurred net operating losses every year. At September 30, 2017, we had an accumulated deficit of $291.5 million.~~

Since ~~2012,~~2015, we have relied on revenues from the sale of Korlym ~~and proceeds from the sale of common stock and from the Financing Agreement~~ to fund our operations.

Based on our current plans ~~which include fully funding our Cushing’s syndrome commercial operations, conducting Phase 2~~ and ~~Phase 3 trials of~~ ~~relacorilant~~ ~~in both Cushing’s syndrome and solid tumors and the Phase 1 and Phase 2 trials of CORT125281 and CORT118335,~~expectations, we expect to fund our operations and planned research and development activities over the next 12 months and beyond without needing to raise additional funds, – although we may choose to raise additional funds ~~to finance our strategic priorities.~~for other reasons. If we were to raise funds, equity financing ~~may~~would be dilutive, ~~to stockholders. Debt~~debt financing ~~if available, may~~could involve restrictive ~~covenants. Funds~~covenants and funds raised through collaborations with other companies may require us to ~~enter into unfavorable arrangements or may require us to~~ relinquish certain rights toin our product candidates.

~~At September 30, 2017,~~

As of March 31, 2022, we had cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities of ~~$76.7~~$368.1 million, consisting of cash and cash equivalents of ~~$31.1~~$61.9 million and marketable securities of ~~$45.6~~$306.2 million, compared to ~~$51.5~~cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities of $335.8 million, consisting of cash and cash equivalents atof $77.6 million and marketable securities of $258.2 million as of December 31, 2016. Net cash provided by operating activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 increased to $36.1 million, compared to $13.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 due to higher sales volumes. Net cash used in investing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 was $46.0 million, primarily due to purchases of marketable securities, while net cash used in investing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 was $119,000. Net cash provided by stock option exercises was $4.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017, compared to $4.1 million for the comparable period of 2016. We made payments under the Financing Agreement of $15.1 million and $10.3 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

~~No further payments under the Financing Agreement are due.~~

2021.

The cash in our bank accounts and our marketable securities could be affected if the financial ~~institution~~institutions holding them were to fail or ~~be subject to~~severely adverse conditions were to arise in the ~~financial markets.~~markets for public or private debt securities. We have never experienced a ~~loss or~~ lack of access to cash.

or material realized losses.

Net cash provided by operating activities was $35.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2022, compared to $25.4 million for the comparable period in 2021. This increase was primarily due to higher revenue.

Net cash used in investing activities was $50.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2022, compared to $3.3 million for the comparable period in 2021. The increase was primarily due to allocation of cash generated from our operating activities towards marketable securities instead of share repurchases.

Net cash used in financing activities was $0.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2022, compared to $45.9 million for the comparable period in 2021. In the three months ended March 31, 2022, we spent $1.9 million acquiring shares of our common stock in connection with the net exercise of employee and executive stock options, offset by $1.4 million received from the exercise of stock options. In the comparable period in 2021, we spent $50.0 million acquiring shares of our common stock ($33.5 million pursuant to our Stock Purchase Program that expired on September 30, 2021 and $16.4 million in connection with the net exercise of employee and director stock options), offset by $4.0 million received from the exercise of stock options.

As of March 31, 2022, we had retained earnings of $217.8 million.

Contractual Obligations and ~~Commercial~~ Commitments

Our contractual payment obligations and purchase commitments ~~as of December 31, 2016~~ are disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2016,~~2021. Our payment obligations and ~~have~~purchase commitments did not ~~changed~~change materially during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2017.~~

March 31, 2022. See Note 4 to our Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for more information regarding our purchase commitments.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

None.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

~~We have prepared our~~

Our condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP, which requires us to make estimates ~~regarding our~~and judgments that affect the amount of assets, liabilities and ~~expenses.~~ expenses we report. We base our estimates on historical experience and on other assumptions we believe to be reasonable. Actual results may differ iffrom our ~~assumptions are incorrect or the conditions in which we do business change in ways we did not anticipate.~~estimates. Our ~~critical~~significant accounting policies ~~and estimates~~ are discussed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, ~~2016. During nine months ended September 30, 2017, we did not make any significant~~2021. There were no changes that occurred during the fiscal quarter covered by this report that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our critical accounting policies and estimates.

~~ITEM 3.~~

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Our market risks as of ~~September 30, 2017~~March 31, 2022 are disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2016. They have~~2021. The market risks associated with our cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities, which consist entirely of debt instruments with original maturities of less than 24 months, did not ~~changed~~change materially during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2017.~~

March 31, 2022.

~~ITEM 4.~~

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. ~~Our~~As of March 31, 2022, our management conducted an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, ~~evaluated~~of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined ~~under~~in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) ofunder the Securities Exchange Act as of ~~September 30, 2017.~~1934 (the “Exchange Act”). Based onupon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer ~~have~~ concluded that, as of March 31, 2022, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide a reasonable ~~level of~~ assurance that the information required to be disclosed by the Company in ~~this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q was (i)~~the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in ~~the SEC’s~~SEC rules and ~~(ii)~~forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the officers who certify our financial reports and to the members of the Company’s senior management ~~including our Chief Executive Officer~~ and ~~Chief Financial Officer, so~~board of directors as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required ~~disclosure. Our~~ disclosure ~~controls and procedures are designed to provide~~at the reasonable ~~not absolute,~~ assurance ~~that our disclosures are accurate and timely.~~

level.

Changes in internal control over financial reporting. In connection with our change in specialty pharmacy, we updated our internal controls related to sales, inventory and accounts receivable. Other than the changes to our controls in connection with our specialty pharmacy transition, our management, including ourOur Chief Financial Officer ~~has~~and other members of management evaluated the changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended ~~September 30, 2017,~~March 31, 2022 and concluded that there was no change during the quarter that materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

~~ITEM 1.~~

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

~~Information pertaining~~

Teva Litigation

In February 2018, we received a Paragraph IV Notice Letter advising that Teva had submitted an Abbreviated New Drug Application (“ANDA”) to ~~legal proceedings~~the United States Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) seeking authorization to manufacture and sell a generic version of Korlym prior to the expiration of patents related to Korlym that are listed in the FDA’s Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations (the “Orange Book”). Teva’s February 5, 2018 Notice Letter alleged that our patents would not be infringed by Teva’s proposed product, were invalid and/or were unenforceable. On March 15, 2018, we filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey against Teva for infringement of our patents. On October 12, 2018, Teva received tentative approval from the FDA for its ANDA. In accordance with the Hatch-Waxman Act, however, FDA final approval of Teva’s ANDA was stayed until August 1, 2020.

On July 6, 2018, we filed an amended complaint and on February 8, 2019, we filed a separate lawsuit against Teva, asserting infringement of several patents, including U.S. Patent No. 10,195,214 (the “ʼ214 patent”). On December 13, 2019, we filed a third lawsuit against Teva, asserting infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 10,500,216 (the “ʼ216 patent”). The District Court consolidated our lawsuits against Teva into a single action and set a trial date of February 2, 2021. On September 24, 2020, the Court vacated the February 2, 2021 trial date. A new trial date has not been set.

On May 7, 2019, Teva submitted to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) a petition for post-grant review (“PGR”) of the ’214 patent. On November 20, 2019, the PTAB agreed to initiate the PGR, and on November 19, 2020 issued a decision upholding the validity of the ’214 patent in its entirety. Teva appealed its loss to the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals, which on December 7, 2021, ruled in Corcept’s favor.

The time for Teva to appeal or seek reconsideration of these adverse decisions has passed. This matter is closed.

Our current lawsuit against Teva asserts the ‘214 patent and the ‘216 patent. The parties have completed briefing cross-motions for summary judgment regarding infringement of the ’214 patent.There is no timetable as to when the Court will rule on these motions and there are currently no further calendared dates for the litigation.

We will vigorously enforce our intellectual property rights relating to Korlym but cannot predict the outcome of this matter.

Sun ANDA Litigation and Settlement

On June 10, 2019, we received a Paragraph IV Notice Letter advising that Sun had submitted an ANDA to the FDA seeking authorization to manufacture, use or sell a generic version of Korlym in the United States prior to the expiration of certain of our patents related to Korlym listed in the Orange Book.

On July 22, 2019, we filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey against Sun for infringement of our patents.On January 23, 2020, we filed an amended complaint against Sun asserting infringement of two additional patents.

On June 9, 2021, we entered into an agreement with Sun resolving this litigation. Pursuant to the agreement, we have granted Sun the right to sell a generic version of Korlym in the United States beginning October 1, 2034 or earlier under circumstances customary for settlement agreements of this type. As required by law, we and Sun have submitted the settlement agreement to the United States Federal Trade Commission and the United States Department of Justice for review.

Hikma ANDA Litigation

On February 1, 2021, we received a Paragraph IV Notice Letter advising that Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. (“Hikma”) had submitted an ANDA to the FDA seeking authorization to manufacture, use or sell a generic version of Korlym in the United States.

The Notice Letter contains Paragraph IV certifications against certain of our patents related to Korlym, alleging that these patents will not be infringed by Hikma’s proposed product, are invalid and/or are unenforceable.

On March 12, 2021, we filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey against Hikma for infringement of the ’214 patent, the ʼ216 patent, U.S. Patent Nos. 10,842,800, and U.S. Patent Nos. 10,842,801. The 30-month stay of FDA approval of Hikma’s ANDA expires on August 1, 2023. Hikma responded to our complaint on May 17,

2021, denying our claims. On July 13, 2021, the Court entered a schedule for the case setting a fact discovery deadline of July 1, 2022.

We intend to vigorously enforce our intellectual property rights relating to Korlym but cannot predict the outcome of this matter.

Other Matters

On March 14, 2019, a purported securities class action complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California by Nicholas Melucci (Melucci v. Corcept Therapeutics Incorporated, et al., Case No. 5:19-cv-01372-LHK) (the “Melucci litigation”). The complaint named us and certain of our executive officers as defendants asserting violations of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder and alleges that the defendants made false and materially misleading statements and failed to disclose adverse facts about our business, operations, and prospects. The complaint asserts a putative class period extending from August 2, 2017 to February 5, 2019 and seeks unspecified monetary relief, interest and attorneys’ fees. On October 7, 2019, the Court appointed a lead plaintiff and lead counsel. The lead plaintiff’s consolidated complaint was filed on December 6, 2019.

We moved to dismiss the consolidated complaint on January 27, 2020. Rather than oppose our motion to dismiss, on March 20, 2020, the lead plaintiff withdrew its consolidated complaint and filed a second amended complaint. On May 11, 2020, we moved to dismiss the second amended complaint. On November 20, 2020, the Court granted our motion to dismiss, while granting plaintiff leave to file a third amended complaint, which plaintiff did on December 21, 2020. On February 19, 2021, we moved to dismiss this third amended complaint. Plaintiff filed its opposition to our motion on April 20, 2021 and we filed our reply on June 4, 2021.

On August 24, 2021, the Court granted our motion in part, but also denied it in part. Certain of plaintiff’s claims have proceeded to discovery. Discovery is currently scheduled to close in April 2023.

We will respond vigorously to plaintiff’s claims but cannot predict the outcome of this matter.

On September 30, 2019, a purported shareholder derivative complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware by Lauren Williams, captioned Lauren Williams v. G. Leonard Baker, et al., Civil Action No. 1:19-cv-01830. The complaint named our board of directors, Chief Executive Officer and current Chief Business Officer as defendants, and us as nominal defendant. The complaint alleges breach of fiduciary duty, violation of Section 14(a) of the Exchange Act, insider selling, misappropriation of insider information and waste of corporate assets and seeks damages in an amount to be proved at trial. On October 23, 2019, this action was stayed pending a resolution of our motions to dismiss the Melucci litigation. On December 20, 2020, the case was further stayed pending a resolution of our motion to dismiss the third amended complaint in the Melucci litigation. On September 30, 2021, the case was further stayed pending a resolution of the Melucci litigation.

We will respond to this complaint vigorously but cannot predict the outcome of this matter.

On December 19, 2019, a second purported shareholder derivative complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware by Jeweltex Pension Plan, captioned Jeweltex Pension Plan v. James N. Wilson, et al., Civil Action No. 1:19-cv-02308. The complaint named our board of directors, Chief Executive Officer and current Chief Business Officer as defendants, and us as nominal defendant. The complaint alleges causes of action for breach of fiduciary duty, violation of section 14(a) of the Exchange Act, waste of corporate assets, contribution and indemnification, aiding and abetting, and gross mismanagement. The complaint seeks damages in an amount to be proved at trial. On April 6, 2020, this action was stayed pending a resolution of our motions to dismiss the Melucci litigation. On December 20, 2020, the case was further stayed pending a resolution of our motion to dismiss the third amended complaint in the Melucci litigation. On September 30, 2021, the case was further stayed pending a resolution of the Melucci litigation.

We will respond to this complaint vigorously but cannot predict the outcome of this matter.

On January 31, 2022, a purported shareholder derivative complaint was filed in the Delaware Court of Chancery by Joel B. Ritchie, captioned Joel B. Ritchie v. G. Leonard Baker, et al., Case No. 2022-0102-SG. The complaint named our board of directors, Chief Executive Officer, current Chief Business Officer, and President of Corcept Endocrinology as defendants, and us as nominal defendant. The complaint alleges a single cause of action for breach of fiduciary duty. The complaint seeks damages in an amount to be proved at trial. On April 20, 2022, the case was further stayed pending a resolution of the Melucci litigation.

We will respond to this complaint vigorously but cannot predict the outcome of this matter.

In November 2021, we received a records subpoena from the United States Attorney’s Office for the District of New Jersey (the “NJ USAO”) pursuant to Section 248 of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) seeking information relating to the sale and promotion of Korlym, our relationships with and payments to health care professionals who can ~~be found~~prescribe or recommend Korlym and prior authorizations and reimbursement for Korlym. The NJ USAO has informed us that it is investigating whether any criminal or civil violations by us occurred in ~~“Part I. Financial Information—Item 1. Financial Statements—Notes~~connection with the matters referenced in the subpoena. It has also informed us that it does not currently consider us a defendant but rather an entity whose conduct is within the scope of the government’s investigation.

In addition to ~~Condensed Financial Statements—Note 5. Commitments and Contingencies” and is incorporated by reference herein.~~

Wethe above-described matters, we are involved from ~~time to time~~time-to-time in ~~various~~other legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of our business. Although the outcome of any ~~pending~~such matters and the amount, if any, of our ~~ultimate~~ liability ~~and any other forms of remedies~~ with respect to ~~these matters,~~them cannot be ~~determined or~~ predicted with certainty, we do not believe that ~~the ultimate outcome of these matters~~they will have a material adverse effect on our business, ~~financial position or~~ results of ~~operations.~~

operations or financial position.

~~ITEM 1A.~~

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

Investing in our common stock involves significant risks. Before investing, carefully consider the risks described below and the other information in this ~~Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q,~~quarterly report, including our condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes. The risks and uncertainties described below are the ones we believe may materially affect us. Many of them have been or may become exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. There may be others of which we are unaware ~~but which become important and~~that could materially harm our business or financial condition and cause the price of our stock to decline, in which case you could lose ~~part~~all or ~~all~~part of your investment.

Summary of Principal Risks

The following bullet points summarize the principal risks we face, each of which could adversely affect our business, operations, and financial results. For clarity of presentation, we have arranged these risks by the part of our business they most directly affect – (i) commercial operations, (ii) research and development, (iii) capital need and financial results, (iv) intellectual property and (v) our stock price. A sixth group of “general risks” lists risks that affect our business as a whole.

Risks Related to ~~the Commercialization of Korlym~~^®

our Commercial Activities

•Failure to generate sufficient revenue from the sale of Korlym would harm our financial results and would likely cause our stock price to decline.

~~For~~

•The COVID-19 pandemic has adversely affected and is continuing to adversely affect our business. Other public health emergencies, natural disasters, terrorism or other catastrophes could further disrupt our activities and render our own or our vendors’ facilities and equipment inoperable or inaccessible and require us to curtail or cease operations.

•New laws, government regulations, or changes to existing laws and regulations could make it difficult or impossible for us to obtain acceptable prices or adequate insurance coverage and reimbursement for Korlym, which would adversely affect our results of operations and financial position.

•If generic versions of Korlym are approved and successfully commercialized, our business, results of operations and financial position would be adversely affected.

Risks Related to our Research and Development Activities

•Our efforts to discover, develop and commercialize our product candidates may not succeed. Clinical drug development is lengthy, expensive and often unsuccessful. Results of early studies and trials are often not predictive of later trial results. Failure can occur at any time.

•The COVID-19 pandemic has lengthened the ~~foreseeable future,~~time it takes to initiate and advance some of our clinical trials.

•Vendors perform many of the activities necessary to carry out our clinical trials, including drug product distribution, trial management and oversight and data collection and analysis. Failure of these vendors to perform their duties or meet expected timelines may prevent or delay approval of our product candidates.

•We may be unable to obtain or maintain regulatory approvals for our product or product candidates, which would prevent us from commercializing our product candidates.

•Our products and product candidates may cause undesirable side effects that halt their clinical development, prevent their regulatory approval, limit their commercial potential or cause us significant liability.

Risks Relating to our Intellectual Property

•To succeed, we must secure, maintain and effectively assert adequate patent protection for the composition and methods of use of our proprietary, selective cortisol modulators and for the use of Korlym to treat Cushing’s syndrome.

Risks Related to our Stock

•The price of our common stock fluctuates widely and is likely to continue to do so. Opportunities for investors to sell shares may be limited.

•Our stock price may decline if our financial performance does not meet the guidance we have provided to the public, estimates published by research analysts or other investor expectations.

General Risks

•We rely on information technology systems to conduct our business. A breakdown or breach of these systems or our failure to protect confidential information concerning our business, patients or employees could interrupt the operation of our business and subject us to liability.

Risk Factors - Discussion

The following section discusses the principal risks listed above, as well as other risks we believe to be material.

Risks Related to our Commercial Activities

Failure to generate sufficient revenue from the sale of Korlym would harm our financial results and would likely cause our stock price to decline.

Our ability to generate revenue and to fund our commercial operations and development programs ~~will be solely~~is dependent on the sale of ~~Korlym.~~Korlym to treat patients with Cushing’s syndrome. Physicians will prescribe Korlym only if they determine that it is preferable to other treatments, even if those ~~products~~treatments are not approved for Cushing’s syndrome. Because Cushing’s syndrome is rare, most physicians are inexperienced ~~in the care of~~diagnosing or caring for patients with the illness and it ~~may~~can be ~~difficult~~hard to persuade them to ~~prescribe Korlym, even~~identify appropriate patients and treat them with ~~clinical trial results that show it is a compelling treatment.~~

Korlym.

Many factors could ~~hamper~~limit our ~~efforts to generate~~ Korlym revenue, including:

•the preference of some physicians for ~~familiar, long-standing off-label~~competing treatments for Cushing’s syndrome, including off-label treatments and generic versions of Korlym, should any such generic versions be introduced;

•natural disasters or ~~for Novartis’ drug, Signifor, for~~other catastrophes, such as the ~~treatment~~COVID-19 pandemic, that reduce the ability or willingness of ~~Cushing’s disease, a subset~~physicians to see patients or of patients ~~with Cushing’s syndrome;~~

to bear the risk of leaving their homes to seek medical care; and

~~competition from non-medical treatment methods, such as surgery and radiation therapy;~~

•

~~negative publicity and political concerns about Korlym, RU-486, Mifeprex~~^® ~~or mifepristone;~~

~~the~~•lack of availability of government or private ~~and~~insurance, the shift of a significant number of patients to Medicaid, which reimburses Korlym at a significantly lower price, or the introduction of government ~~insurance coverage; and~~

price controls or other price-reducing regulations.

~~rapid technological change that makes Korlym obsolete.~~

Failure to generate sufficient Korlym revenue ~~would~~could prevent us from fully funding our planned commercial and clinical activities and would likely cause our stock price to decline.

The ~~Orphan Drug~~COVID-19 pandemic has adversely affected and is continuing to adversely affect our business. Other public health emergencies, natural disasters, terrorism or other catastrophes could further disrupt our activities and render our own or our vendors’ facilities and equipment inoperable or inaccessible and require us to curtail or cease operations.

COVID-19, a serious and sometimes fatal illness, has spread to every country in the world and throughout the United States. Many countries, including most states of the United States, reacted by instituting quarantines, “lockdowns” and other public health restrictions on leisure activities, work and travel. In California, where our headquarters are located, and in the states where our clinical specialists and medical science liaisons live and work, residents have been subject to significant public health restrictions. We have been managing our business with limited in-person activities, supplemented primarily by video conference, teleconference and email. Although pandemic-related restrictions have been eased or removed in some places, including California, our business remains subject to pandemic-related controls, which may become more restrictive at any time. We rely on third-party manufacturers, distributors (including the specialty pharmacy that dispenses Korlym), information technology and software service providers, law and accounting firms, clinical research organizations and consultants who are subject to, or may become subject to, pandemic-related controls. If these third parties cannot perform the services we require in a timely way and we cannot successfully implement replacements or workarounds, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be harmed.

COVID-19 has made it difficult to grow our commercial business. Many physicians have reduced the frequency of patient office visits and barred office visits by third parties, including our clinical specialists and medical science liaisons. In addition, many patients have postponed visits to their physicians or testing at clinical laboratories or imaging centers. These

precautions have made it harder for physicians to identify patients who may benefit from Korlym, begin their treatment, arrive at an optimum dose and maintain their patients’ regimens.

We cannot predict the duration of these impacts on our business or how severe future impacts may be. If physicians do not prescribe Korlym to new patients or have difficulty increasing a patient’s Korlym dose to its optimal level, or if patients already receiving Korlym discontinue treatment, our revenue will be unlikely to grow and may decline.

Other disasters could harm our business, operating results and financial condition. Our headquarters are in the San Francisco Bay Area, which experiences earthquakes. Our specialty pharmacy, tablet manufacturers and warehouses are in areas subject to hurricanes and tornadoes. Political considerations relating to mifepristone put us and our manufacturers at increased risk of protests and disruptive events. If a disaster were to occur, we might not be able to operate our business. Our insurance, if available at all, would likely be insufficient to cover losses resulting from disasters or other business interruptions.

If generic versions of Korlym are approved and successfully commercialized, our business, results of operations and financial position would be adversely affected.

The marketing exclusivity provided by Korlym’s orphan drug designation expired in February 2019, which means other companies may now seek to introduce generic equivalents of Korlym for Korlym’s approved indication, provided such parties receive FDA approval and can show that they would not infringe our applicable patents or that those patents are invalid or unenforceable. If our patents are successfully challenged and a generic version of Korlym becomes available, our sales of Korlym tablets and their price could decline rapidly and significantly, which would reduce our revenue and materially harm our results of operations and financial position. Competition from a generic version of Korlym may ~~not prevent competition from~~also cause our revenue to be materially less than the public guidance we have provided, which would likely cause the price of our common stock to decline.

Legal action to enforce or defend intellectual property rights is complex, costly and involves significant commitments of management time. There can be no assurance of a successful outcome. We have sued Teva and Hikma in Federal District Court with respect to their proposed generic versions of Korlym. In November 2020, the PTAB ruled against Teva in a challenge Teva had brought to one of our patents, a ruling which the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals has affirmed. We had also sued Sun with respect to its proposed generic version of Korlym, although we settled that lawsuit in June 2021. The terms of our settlement with Sun are subject to customary review by the Federal Trade Commission and Department of Justice. Please see “Part II, Item 1, Legal Proceedings.” Because Teva has received FDA approval, Teva may choose to begin marketing its generic product at any time, notwithstanding our ongoing litigation. We would seek a court order stopping such a course of action, but even if we were to prevail (i.e., Teva were to withdraw its product and pay us damages), the temporary availability of a generic version of Korlym might materially harm our results of operations and financial condition.

It is likely that other companies ~~that~~will seek FDA approval to market a generic version of Korlym. While we will vigorously protect our intellectual property, there can be no assurance our efforts will be successful.

Other companies offer or are attempting to develop ~~other compounds for the treatment of~~different medications to treat patients with Cushing’s syndrome. ~~These companies may have significantly more resources than we do. Competition from them~~The availability of competing treatments could limit our revenue from Korlym.

Since 2012, a medication owned by the ~~sale of Korlym for~~Italian pharmaceutical company Recordati-S.p.A., the ~~treatment of Cushing’s syndrome or other indications.~~

Although we have received Orphan Drug designation in the United States, the regulatory authorities may still approve other drugs for the treatment of patients with Cushing’s syndrome. When the orphan drug exclusivity period ends, we may be subject to competition from manufacturers offering a generic form of Korlym at a lower price, in which case our business could be harmed.

~~In 2012, Novartis received approval~~somatostatin analogue Signifor® (pasireotide) Injection, has been marketed in both the United States and the European Union (“EU”) ~~to market its somatostatin analogue Signifor~~ for adult patients with Cushing’s disease (a subset of Cushing’s ~~syndrome that accounts for approximately 70 percent of all~~syndrome). On March 6, 2020, the FDA granted Recordati approval to market another cortisol synthesis inhibitor, Isturisa® (osilodrostat) tablets, to treat patients with Cushing’s ~~syndrome) for whom pituitary surgery~~disease. Osilodrostat is ~~not an option or has not been curative. In addition, Novartis has received Orphan Drug designation~~approved in the United States for the use of the experimental compound osilodrostat to treat Cushing’s disease and in the EU to treat Cushing’s syndrome. Novartis has begun a Phase 2 clinical trial in Japan investigating the use of this compound to treat Cushing’s syndrome due to causes other than Cushing’s disease and a Phase 3 clinical trial in the EU investigating its use to treat Cushing’s disease. Novartis has substantially more resources and experience than we do and may provide significant competition.

~~Strongbridge Biopharma plc (“Strongbridge”) has received Orphan Drug designation in the United States and~~ the EU for the ~~use~~treatment of ~~levoketoconazole to treat~~patients with Cushing’s syndrome. ~~Strongbridge has begun two Phase 3 clinical trials in Europe and the United States for this indication. Laboratoire HRA Pharma~~

On December 31, 2021, Xeris Biopharma Holdings, Inc. (“~~HRA”~~Xeris”) received ~~Orphan Drug designation in~~FDA approval to market the ~~United States and the EU for the use of mifepristone~~cortisol synthesis inhibitor Recorlev® (levoketoconazole) to treat patients with ectopic tumors producing ACTH, a subtype of Cushing’s syndrome representing ten percent of those diagnosed with the disease. HRA began and terminated a Phase 2 clinical trial in Europe and the United States for this indication. Exelgyn Laboratories, which operates as a subsidiary of Medi Challenge (Pty) Ltd., received Orphan Drug designation for mifepristone to treat Cushing’s syndrome in the United States. Levoketoconazole is an enantiomer of the generic anti-fungal medication, ketoconazole, that is prescribed off-label to treat patients with Cushing’s syndrome.

Osilodrostat and levoketoconazole have been designated orphan drugs in both the EU ~~but has stated that~~and the United States.

New laws, government regulations, or changes to existing laws and regulations could make it ~~has not yet conducted any clinical trials.~~

~~If we cannot continue~~difficult or impossible for us to obtain acceptable prices or adequate insurance coverage and reimbursement for Korlym, ~~we will be unable to generate significant revenues.~~

which would adversely affect our results of operations and financial position.

The commercial success of Korlym depends on the availability of acceptable pricing and adequate insurance coverage and reimbursement. Government ~~payors,~~payers, including Medicare, Medicaid and the Veterans Administration, as well as private insurers and health maintenance organizations, are increasingly attempting to contain healthcare costs by limiting reimbursement for medicines. If government or private ~~payors~~payers cease to provide adequate and timely coverage, pricing and

reimbursement for Korlym, physicians may not prescribe the medication orand patients may not purchase it, even if it is ~~prescribed. In addition, delays in coverage for individual patients~~prescribed, or the price we receive may be reduced, which would reduce our ~~revenues.~~

revenue.

In ~~some~~many foreign markets, drug prices and the profitability of prescription medications are subject to government control. In the United States, we expect that there will continue to be federal and state proposals for similar controls. Also, the trends toward managed health care in the United States and recent laws and legislation intended to increase the public visibility of drug prices and reduce the cost of government and private insurance programs could significantly influence the purchase of health care services and products and may result in lower prices for Korlym.

In the United States, there have been and continue to be legislative initiatives to contain healthcare costs. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (“~~PPACA”~~ACA”), which was passed in 2010, substantially changed the way health care is financed by both governmental and private ~~insurers and significantly impacts the U.S. pharmaceutical industry.~~insurers. The ~~PPACA,~~ACA, among other things, expanded Medicaid program eligibility and access to commercial health insurance coverage, increased the minimum Medicaid rebates owed by manufacturers under the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program and extended the rebate program to individuals enrolled in Medicaid managed care organizations, established annual fees and taxes on manufacturers of certain branded prescription drugs, and promoted a new Medicare Part D coverage gap discount program. The ~~PPACA~~ACA also appropriated ~~additional~~ funding to comparative clinical effectiveness research, although it remains unclear how the research will ~~impact current~~affect Medicare coverage and reimbursement or how new information will influence other third-party ~~payor~~payer policies.

Since its enactment, there have been judicial and Congressional challenges to certain aspects of the PPACA, and we expect there will be additional challenges and amendments to the PPACA in the future, particularly in light of the new presidential administration and U.S. Congress. For example, on January 20, 2017, President Trump signed an Executive Order directing federal agencies with authorities and responsibilities under the PPACA to waive, defer, grant exemptions from, or delay the implementation of any provision of the PPACA that would impose a fiscal or regulatory burden on states, individuals, healthcare providers, health insurers, or manufacturers of pharmaceuticals or medical devices. On October 12, 2017, President Trump signed another Executive Order directing federal agencies to expand access to alternative health plans and health reimbursement arrangements, and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services announced that it would immediately cease making Cost-Sharing Reduction (“CSR”) payments to issuers of qualified health plans. At this time, the full effect that the PPACA, the Executive Orders, the halting of CSR payments and any subsequent legislation would have on our business remains unclear. Any new limitations on, changes to, or uncertainty with respect to the ability of individuals to enroll in governmental reimbursement programs or other third-party payor insurance plans could impact demand for Korlym, which in turn could affect our ability to successfully develop and commercialize our products.

Other legislative and regulatory changes have been ~~proposed and~~ adopted in the United States since the ~~PPACA~~ACA was enacted. These changes included an aggregate reduction in Medicare payments to providers of ~~up to~~ 2 percent per fiscal year, which went into effect on April 1, 2013 and will remain in effect through ~~2025~~2030, with the exception of a temporary suspension from May 1, 2020 through March 31, 2022, and a 1 percent reduction from May 1, 2022 through June 30, 2022, unless additional Congressional action is taken. ~~On January 2, 2013, President Obama signed into law~~In addition, the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012, ~~which~~ further reduced Medicare payments to several providers, including hospitals, imaging centers and cancer treatment centers, and increased the statute of limitations period for the government to recover overpayments to providers from three to five years. ~~On February~~In March 2021, the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 was also signed into law, which, among other things, eliminated the statutory cap on drug manufacturers’ Medicaid Drug Rebate Program rebate liability, effective January 1, ~~2016,~~2024. Under current law enacted as part of the ~~Centers~~ACA, drug manufacturers’ Medicaid Drug Rebate Program rebate liability is capped at 100% of the average manufacturer price for a covered outpatient drug. Moreover, the federal government and the individual states in the United States have become increasingly active in developing proposals, passing legislation and implementing regulations designed to control drug pricing, including price or patient reimbursement constraints, discounts, formulary flexibility, marketing cost disclosure and transparency measures.

There also continue to be federal and state initiatives to contain healthcare costs, in part informed by the current atmosphere of mounting criticism of prescription drug costs in the United States. We expect governmental oversight and scrutiny of pharmaceutical companies will continue to increase and there will continue to be proposals to change the healthcare system in ways that could harm our ability to sell Korlym profitably. We anticipate that the United States Congress, state legislatures, and regulators may implement healthcare policies intended to curb healthcare costs, such as federal and state controls on reimbursement for drugs (including under Medicare ~~& Medicaid Services,~~and commercial health plans), new or ~~CMS, published a final rule~~increased requirements to pay prescription drug rebates and penalties to government health care programs and policies that ~~revised certain requirements involved~~require drug companies to disclose and justify the prices they charge. For example, measures have been introduced in ~~our calculation of prices we report in connection with our participation in government reimbursement programs so~~Congress that ~~Korlym will be eligible for purchase by, or qualify for partial or full reimbursement from, Medicaid and other government programs. The extent to which this rule may alter our reported~~would impose caps on prescription drug prices and ~~estimated rebates and chargebacks under government programs remains unclear.~~

~~These new~~would require manufacturers to negotiate drug pricing with the government.

Recently enacted laws and the regulations and policies implementing them, as well as other ~~healthcare reform~~healthcare-related measures that may be adopted in the future, could materially reduce our Korlym revenues and our ability to ~~successfully~~ develop and commercialize our product candidates.

We depend on vendors to manufacture Korlym’s active ingredient, form it into tablets, package it and dispense it to patients. We also depend on vendors to manufacture the API and capsules or tablets for our product candidates. If our suppliers become unable or unwilling to perform these functions and we cannot transfer these activities to replacement vendors in a timely manner, our business will be harmed.

A single third-party manufacturer, Produits Chimiques Auxiliaires et de Synthese SA (“PCAS”), supplies the API in Korlym. Two other third-party manufacturers produce and bottle Korlym tablets. Our agreement with PCAS automatically renews for two one-year terms, unless either party provides 12-months’ written notice of its intent not to renew. A single specialty pharmacy, Optime Care, Inc. (“Optime”) dispenses Korlym directly to patients and collects payments from insurers representing approximately 99 percent of our revenue. If Optime does not adhere to its agreements with payers, it may not be able to collect some or all of the payments due to us. Our agreement with Optime has a five-year term and renews upon the written consent of both parties, subject to customary termination provisions, including the right of Optime to terminate in the

event of a material breach by us that we do not cure in a reasonable period of time after receiving written notice. In addition, we may terminate the agreement for convenience. In the event any of these vendors fails to perform its contractual obligations to us or is materially impaired in its performance by the COVID-19 pandemic or for any other reason, we may experience disruptions and delays in our supply chain and our ability to deliver Korlym to patients, which would adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial position.

The facilities used by our vendors to manufacture and package the API and drug product for Korlym and our product ~~candidates.~~

candidates must be approved by the FDA and, in some cases, the European Medicines Agency (“EMA”) or the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (“MHRA”). We do not control the activities of these vendors, including whether they maintain adequate quality control and hire qualified personnel. We are dependent on them for compliance with the regulatory requirements known as current good manufacturing practices (“cGMPs”). If our vendors cannot manufacture material that conforms to our specifications and the strict requirements of the FDA or others, they will not be able to maintain regulatory authorizations for their facilities and we could be prohibited from using the API or drug product they have provided. If the FDA, EMA, MHRA or other regulatory authorities withdraw regulatory authorizations of these facilities, we may need to find alternative vendors or facilities, which would be time-consuming, complex and expensive and could significantly hamper our ability to develop, obtain regulatory approval for and market our products. Sanctions could be imposed on us, including fines, injunctions, civil penalties, refusal of regulators to approve our product candidates, delays, suspensions or withdrawals of approvals, seizures or recalls of products, operating restrictions and criminal prosecutions, any of which could harm our business.

~~Public~~The unfavorable public perception of mifepristone may limit our ability to sell Korlym.

The active ingredient in Korlym, mifepristone, is approved by the FDA in another drug for the termination of early pregnancy. As a result, mifepristone ~~has been and continues to be~~is the subject of considerable ~~ethical and political~~ debate in the United States and elsewhere. Public perception of mifepristone may limit ~~our ability to engage alternative manufacturers and may limit~~ the ~~commercial~~ acceptance of Korlym by patients and physicians. Even though we have taken measures to minimize the ~~likelihood of the prescribing of~~chance that Korlym will accidentally be prescribed to a pregnant woman, physicians may choose not to prescribe Korlym to a woman simply to avoid the risk of ~~unintentionally~~ terminating a pregnancy.

We have no manufacturing or pharmacy capabilities and depend on third-party vendors to manufacture Korlym and dispense it to patients. We also depend on third-party suppliers to manufacture the API and capsules for relacorilant, CORT118335, CORT125281 and our other product candidates. If these suppliers are unable or unwilling to continue to manufacture our drug products or dispense Korlym for us and we cannot transfer our business to qualified replacement vendors in a timely manner or if our vendors fail to comply with FDA or other applicable regulations or their agreements with us or otherwise fail to meet our requirements, our business will be harmed.

PCAS, a third-party manufacturer, supplies all of the API in Korlym. Another third-party manufacturer, Alcami, produces and bottles all of our Korlym tablets. We have entered into agreements with these vendors that automatically renew. Optime Care, Inc., a specialty pharmacy, dispenses all of the Korlym we sell directly to patients. Our agreement with this vendor has a five-year term and renews upon the written consent of both parties. We rely on other third-parties to manufacture the API and capsules of our selective cortisol modulators, including relacorilant, CORT118335 and CORT125281. If any of these vendors is unable or unwilling to meet our requirements, we may not be able to manufacture or dispense our product in a timely manner. Our arrangements with these manufacturers are terminable by them, subject to notice provisions. Any third-party manufacturer or specialty pharmacy we engage will be subject to regulation by the FDA and other governmental authorities. We do not control these vendors’ processes or operations and cannot assure that they will meet applicable regulatory requirements or their contractual obligations to us. Identifying replacements for these vendors and transitioning our business to them would be complex and expensive. Failure to do so in a timely manner would harm our business.

The facilities used by our vendors to manufacture and package our product and product candidates must be approved by the FDA. We do not control the manufacturing activities of, and are completely dependent on, our contract manufacturing partners for compliance with the regulatory requirements known as current good manufacturing practices (“cGMPs”). If our contract manufacturers cannot successfully manufacture material that conforms to our specifications and the strict requirements of the FDA or others, they will not be able to maintain regulatory approval for their manufacturing facilities. In addition, we have no control over the ability of our contract manufacturers to maintain adequate quality control, quality assurance and qualified personnel. If the FDA or a comparable foreign regulatory authority does not approve these facilities for the manufacture of our products or if it withdraws its approval, we may need to find alternative manufacturing facilities, which would significantly hamper our ability to develop, obtain regulatory approval for or market our products. In addition, sanctions could be imposed on us, including fines, injunctions, civil penalties, failure of regulators to approve our product candidates, delays, suspension or withdrawal of approvals, seizures or recalls of products, operating restrictions and criminal prosecutions, any of which could harm our business. If our suppliers fail to manufacture Korlym or our product candidates on a timely basis in the quantities that we require or fail to maintain manufacturing capabilities that meet regulatory standards, we may exhaust our Korlym inventory and not be able to generate revenue or our clinical development programs may be delayed.

We may not have adequate insurance to cover our exposure to product liability claims.

We may be subject to product liability or other claims based on allegations that Korlym or one of our product candidates has ~~caused adverse effects.~~harmed a patient. Such a claim may damage our reputation by raising questions about Korlym or ~~any of~~ our product candidates’ safety and could prevent or interfere with product development or commercialization. ~~In some cases, less~~Less common adverse effects of a pharmaceutical product are sometimes not known until long after the ~~FDA approves the~~ product is approved for marketing. Because the active ingredient in Korlym is used to terminate pregnancy, clinicians using ~~the medicine~~Korlym in ~~our~~ clinical trials and physicians prescribing the medicine to women must take strict precautions to ensure that ~~the medicine~~it is not administered to pregnant women. Failure to observe these precautions could result in significant product liability claims.

~~We have product liability~~

Our insurance ~~with coverage limits we believe to be appropriate for a company marketing a single pharmaceutical product and developing others. However, this insurance may become prohibitively expensive or~~ may not fully cover our potential product liabilities. ~~Our inability~~Inability to obtain adequate insurance coverage ~~at an acceptable cost~~ could ~~prevent or~~ inhibit ~~the commercialization~~development of ~~Korlym or~~ our product candidates or result in ~~meaningful underinsured or~~significant uninsured liability. Defending a lawsuit could be costly and ~~significantly~~ divert ~~management’s attention~~management from ~~conducting our business.~~

productive activities.

~~We are subject to ongoing and continued regulatory review.~~ If we are unable to maintain regulatory approval of Korlym ~~for the treatment of patients with Cushing’s syndrome~~ or if we fail to comply with ~~regulatory~~other requirements, we will be unable to generate revenue orand may be subject to ~~penalties and our business would be harmed.~~

~~The FDA’s approval of Korlym was subject to limitations on the uses for which the product may be marketed. If we violate any of the FDA’s restrictions, the FDA could withdraw its approval.~~

penalties.

We are subject to ~~ongoing obligations and continued regulatory review~~oversight by the FDA and other regulatory authorities in the United States and ~~other countries~~elsewhere with respect to ~~the~~our research, testing, manufacturing, labeling, distribution, adverse event reporting, storage, ~~selling,~~ advertising, promotion, recordkeeping and sales and marketing ~~of products.~~activities. These requirements include submissions of safety information, annual updates on manufacturing activities and continued compliance with FDA regulations, including cGMPs, ~~as well as current~~ good laboratory practices ~~(“cGLPs”)~~ and ~~current~~ good clinical practices (“~~cGCPs”~~GCP”) ~~for any clinical trials that we conduct post-approval. cGLPs, cGCPs and cGMPs are~~. The FDA enforces these regulations ~~promulgated by the FDA and enforced~~ through ~~periodic~~ inspections of us and the laboratories, ~~manufactures,~~manufacturers and clinical sites we use. ~~(Foreign~~Foreign regulatory authorities have comparable requirements and enforcement mechanisms.) Discovery of previously unknown problems with a product ~~including~~or product candidate, such as adverse events of unanticipated severity or frequency or ~~with our third-party manufacturers or~~deficiencies in manufacturing processes or management, as well as failure to comply with FDA ~~and~~or other ~~applicable~~U.S. or foreign ~~and U.S.~~ regulatory requirements, may ~~result in~~subject us to substantial civil and criminal penalties, injunctions, holds on clinical trials, product seizure, ~~or detention,~~ refusal to permit the import or export of products, restrictions on product marketing, withdrawal of the product from the market, ~~voluntary or mandatory~~ product recalls, total or partial suspension of production, refusal to approve pending ~~NDAs~~new drug applications (“NDAs”) or supplemental NDAs, and suspension or revocation of product approvals.

The FDA’s policies may change or additional governmental regulations may be enacted that prevent, limit or delay regulatory approval of our product candidates. We cannot predict the likelihood, nature or extent of future government regulations.

For example, on January 30, 2017, President Trump issued an Executive Order directing all executive agencies, including the FDA, that, for each notice of proposed rulemaking or final regulation to be issued in fiscal year 2017, the agency shall identify at least two existing regulations to be repealed, unless prohibited by law. These requirements are referred to as the “two-for-one” provisions. This Executive Order includes a budget neutrality provision that requires the total incremental cost of all new regulations in the 2017 fiscal year, including repealed regulations, to be no greater than zero, except in limited circumstances. For fiscal years 2018 and beyond, the Executive Order requires agencies to identify regulations to offset any incremental cost of a new regulation. In interim guidance issued by the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs within OMB on February 2, 2017, the administration indicates that the “two-for-one” provisions may apply not only to agency regulations, but also to significant agency guidance documents. In addition, on February 24, 2017, President Trump issued an executive order directing each affected agency to designate an agency official as a “Regulatory Reform Officer” and establish a “Regulatory Reform Task Force” to implement the two-for-one provisions and other previously issued executive orders relating to the review of federal regulations; however, it is difficult to predict how these requirements will be implemented, and the extent to which they will impact the FDA’s ability to exercise its regulatory authority. On September 8, 2017, the FDA published notices in the Federal Register soliciting broad public comment to identify regulations that could be modified in compliance with these Executive Orders. If these executive actions impose restrictions on FDA’s ability to engage in oversight and implementation activities in the normal course, our business may be negatively impacted. Similarly, if we are slow or unable to adapt to changes in existing requirements or the adoption of new requirements or policies, or if we are not able to maintain regulatory compliance, we may place at risk the FDA marketing approval for Korlym and any other marketing approval that we may obtain, which would adversely affect our business, prospects and ability to sustain profitability.

We may be subject to civil or criminal penalties if ~~we market~~our marketing of Korlym ~~in a manner that~~ violates FDA regulations or health care fraud and abuse laws.

~~In the United States, we~~

We are subject to FDA regulations governing the promotion and sale of medications. Although physicians are permitted to prescribe drugs for ~~indications other than those approved by the FDA,~~any indication they choose, manufacturers ~~are prohibited from promoting~~may only promote products for ~~such “off-label” uses.~~their FDA-approved use. All other uses are referred to as “off-label.” In the United States, we market Korlym ~~for treatment of~~to treat hyperglycemia secondary to hypercortisolism in adult patients with endogenous Cushing’s syndrome who have type 2 diabetes mellitus or glucose intolerance and ~~have~~for whom surgery has failed ~~surgery~~ or ~~are~~is not ~~candidates for surgery and~~an option. We provide promotional materials and training programs to physicians ~~regarding~~covering the use of Korlym for this indication. ~~Although we believe our marketing materials and training programs for physicians do not constitute “off-label” promotion of Korlym, the~~The FDA may ~~disagree.~~ change its policies or enact new regulations at any time that restrict our ability to promote our products.

If the FDA ~~determines~~were to determine that ~~our promotional materials, training or other activities by our employees or agents constitute “off-label”~~we engaged in off-label promotion, ~~of Korlym, it~~the FDA could ~~ask~~require us to change our ~~training or promotional materials or other activities. The FDA could also~~practices and subject us to regulatory enforcement actions, including issuance of a public “warning letter,” untitled letter, injunction, seizure, civil fine or criminal penalties. Other federal or state enforcement authorities might act if they believe that the alleged improper promotion led to the submission and payment of claims for an unapproved use, which could result in significant fines or penalties under other statutory authorities, such as laws prohibiting false claims for reimbursement. Even if it is determined that we are not in violation of these laws, we may ~~be faced with~~receive negative publicity, incur significant expenses and be forced to devote management time to defending our position.

WeIn addition to laws prohibiting off-label promotion, we are also subject to federal and state healthcare fraud and abuse laws and regulations ~~including:~~

designed to prevent fraud, kickbacks, self-dealing, and other abusive practices. The United States healthcare laws and regulations that may affect our ability to operate include, but are not limited to:

•the federal Anti-Kickback Statute, which prohibits, among other things, ~~persons from~~ knowingly and willfully soliciting, receiving, offering or paying remuneration, directly or indirectly, in exchange for or to induce either the referral of an individual for, or the purchase, order or recommendation of, any good or service for which payment may be made under federal health care programs such as ~~the~~ Medicare and ~~Medicaid programs;~~

Medicaid. A person or entity does not need to have actual knowledge of the statute or specific intent to violate it in order to have committed a violation;

•federal false claims laws, including, without limitation, the False Claims Act, which prohibit any person from knowingly presenting, or causing to be presented, a false claim for payment to the federal government, or knowingly making, or causing to be made, a false statement to get a false claim paid. In addition, the government may assert that a claim including items or services resulting from a violation of the federal Anti-Kickback Statute constitutes a false or fraudulent claim for purposes of the False Claims Act. Pharmaceutical companies have been prosecuted under these laws for a variety of promotional and marketing activities, such as allegedly providing free product to or entering into “sham” consulting arrangements with customers to induce such customers to purchase, order or recommend the company’s products in violation of the Anti-Kickback Statute and federal false claims laws and regulations; reporting to pricing services inflated average wholesale prices that were then used by certain governmental programs to set reimbursement rates; engaging in the promotion of “off-label” uses that caused customers to submit claims to and obtain reimbursement from governmental ~~payors~~payers for non-covered “off-label” uses; and submitting inflated best price information to the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program;

the government may assert that a claim including items and services resulting from a violation of the federal Anti-Kickback Statute constitutes a false or fraudulent claim for purposes of the False Claims Act;

•the federal Civil Monetary Penalties law, which prohibits, among other things, offering or transferring remuneration to a federal healthcare beneficiary that a person knows or should know is likely to influence the beneficiary’s decision to order or receive items or services reimbursable by the government from a particular provider or supplier;

•the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (“HIPAA”), which created federal criminal laws that prohibit executing a scheme to defraud any health care benefit program or making false statements relating to health care matters;

similar to the federal Anti-Kickback Statute, a person or entity does not need to have actual knowledge of the statute or specific intent to violate it in order to have committed a violation;

•

•federal “sunshine” laws, including the federal Physician Payment Sunshine Act, that require transparency regarding financial arrangements with health care providers, such as the reporting and disclosure requirements imposed by the PPACA on drug manufacturers regarding any “transfer of value” made or distributed to prescribers and other health care providers, and ownership or investment interests held by physicians and their immediate family members. Manufacturers are required to submit reports detailing these financial arrangements by the 90^th ~~day of each calendar year;~~

~~HIPAA, as amended~~ by the ~~Health Information Technology for Economic~~ACA on drug manufacturers regarding any “transfer of value” made or distributed to physicians (defined to include doctors, dentists, optometrists, podiatrists and ~~Clinical Health Act of 2009~~chiropractors), certain non-physician practitioners (physician assistants, nurse practitioners, clinical nurse specialists, anesthesiologist assistants, certified registered nurse anesthetists, anesthesiology assistants and certified nurse midwives), teaching hospitals, and ownership or investment interests held by physicians and their ~~respective implementing regulations,~~immediate family members. Manufacturers are required to submit reports detailing these financial arrangements by the 90th day of each calendar year;

•federal consumer protection and unfair competition laws, which ~~impose obligations on covered healthcare providers, health plans,~~broadly regulate marketplace activities and ~~healthcare clearinghouses, as well as their business associates~~activities that ~~create, receive, maintain or transmit individually identifiable health information for or on behalf of a covered entity, with respect to safeguarding the privacy, security~~potentially harm consumers; and ~~transmission of individually identifiable health information; and~~

•state law equivalents of each of the above federal laws, such as anti-kickback and false claims laws which may apply to items or services reimbursed by any third-party ~~payor,~~payer, including commercial insurers; state laws that require pharmaceutical companies to comply with the pharmaceutical industry’s voluntary compliance guidelines and the relevant compliance guidance promulgated by the federal government or otherwise restrict payments that may be made to healthcare providers; and state laws that require drug manufacturers to report information related to payments and other transfers of value to physicians and other healthcare providers or marketing ~~expenditures;~~expenditures and state laws governing the privacy and security of health information in certain circumstances, many of which differ from each other in significant ways and often are not preempted by HIPAA, thus complicating compliance efforts.

pricing information.

The risk of ~~our~~ being found in violation of these laws and regulations is increased by the fact that many of them have not been ~~fully~~definitively interpreted by ~~the~~ regulatory authorities or the courts and their provisions are open to a variety of interpretations. Because of the breadth of these laws and the narrowness of the statutory exceptions and safe harbors available under them, it is possible that some of our business activities, including our relationships with physicians and other healthcare providers ~~some~~(some of whom recommend, purchase and/or prescribe our ~~products,~~products) and the manner in which we promote our products, could be subject to challenge. We are also exposed to the risk that our employees, independent contractors, principal investigators, consultants, vendors, distributors, and ~~CROs~~contract research organizations (“CROs”) may engage in fraudulent or other illegal activity. Although we have policies and procedures prohibiting such activity, it is not always possible to identify and deter misconduct and the precautions we take may not be effective in controlling unknown risks or in protecting us from governmental investigations or other actions or lawsuits stemming from a failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations.

In November 2021, we received a records subpoena from the NJ USAO seeking information relating to the sale and promotion of Korlym, our relationships with and payments to health care professionals who can prescribe or recommend Korlym and prior authorizations and reimbursement for Korlym. The NJ USAO has informed us that it is investigating whether any criminal or civil violations by us occurred in connection with the matters referenced in the subpoena. It has also informed us that it does not currently consider us a defendant but rather an entity whose conduct is within the scope of the government’s investigation. We are cooperating with the investigation. Please see “Part II, Item 1, Legal Proceedings.”

If ~~our operations~~we are found ~~to be~~ in violation of any of the laws described above or any other government regulations, we may be subject to civil and criminal penalties, damages, fines, exclusion from governmental health care programs, a corporate integrity agreement or other agreement to resolve allegations of non-compliance, individual imprisonment, and the curtailment or restructuring of our operations, any of which could adversely affect our financial results and ability to operate.

~~A break-down or breach of our information technology systems could subject us to liability or interrupt the operation of our business.~~

We store sensitive data on our computer networks and on the networks of third-party vendors, including intellectual property and confidential information relating to our business, patients and employees. Despite the implementation of security measures, our internal computer systems and those of our vendors are subject to the risk of cyber-attacks, computer viruses, unauthorized access, natural disasters, terrorism, war and telecommunication and electrical failures. In addition, system failures could cause the loss of valuable clinical trial data or otherwise disrupt our clinical and commercial activities and be expensive and time-consuming to remedy. If a disruption or security breach resulted in the disclosure of confidential or proprietary information, we could incur liability and our research, development and commercialization efforts could be delayed or otherwise harmed.

~~A catastrophic disaster could damage our own or our manufacturers’ facilities and equipment, which could require us to cease or curtail operations.~~

Our business is vulnerable to damage from various types of natural disasters or other disruptive events, including earthquakes, fires, floods, power losses and communications failures. For example, our headquarters are located in the San Francisco Bay Area, which is earthquake-prone, and our specialty pharmacy is located in an area that is subject to severe weather conditions. In addition, political considerations relating to mifepristone put us and our manufacturers at increased risk for terrorist attacks, protests or other disruptive events. If a disaster or similar event were to occur, we might not be able to operate our business or our manufacturers might not be able to produce or dispense Korlym or our product candidates. Our insurance may not cover or be adequate to cover losses resulting from disasters or other business interruptions.

Risks Related to ~~the~~our Research and Development ofActivities

Our efforts to discover, develop and commercialize our ~~Product Candidates~~

product candidates may not succeed. Clinical drug development is lengthy, expensive and is often ~~not successful.~~unsuccessful. Results of ~~earlier~~early studies and trials ~~may~~are often not be predictive of ~~future~~later trial results.

Failure can occur at any time.

Clinical development is ~~expensive~~costly, time-consuming and ~~takes a long time. Data obtained~~unpredictable. Positive data from clinical trials are susceptible to varying interpretations, which could delay, limit or prevent regulatory approval. The results from early clinical trials ~~may~~are often not be predictive of results in later clinical trials. Product candidates may ~~ultimately~~ fail to show the desired safety and efficacy traits despite having produced positive results in preclinical studies and initial clinical trials. Many companies have suffered significant setbacks in ~~advanced~~late-stage clinical trials due to lack of efficacy or ~~the~~unanticipated or unexpectedly severe adverse ~~safety profile of their product candidate.~~

events.

Our current clinical trials ~~are too small~~may prove inadequate to support marketing ~~approvals for the compounds being studied.~~approvals. Even ~~if these~~ trials that generate positive results ~~those results would~~may have to be confirmed in ~~one or more substantially~~much larger, more expensive and lengthier trials before we could seek regulatory ~~approvals.~~

~~The commencement~~approval.

Clinical trials may take longer to complete, cost more than expected and ~~completion~~fail for many reasons, including:

•failure to show efficacy or acceptable safety;

•slow patient enrollment or delayed activation of clinical ~~trials may be delayed by factors beyond our control, including:~~

trial sites due to the COVID-19 pandemic or other factors;

•delays obtaining regulatory permission to start a ~~trial;~~

trial, changes to the size or design of a trial or changes in regulatory requirements for a trial already underway;

•inability to secure acceptable terms with ~~Clinical Research Organizations (“CROs”)~~vendors and an appropriate number of clinical trial sites;

•delays or inability to obtain institutional review board (“IRB”) approval at prospective trial sites;

~~slow patient enrollment;~~

~~negative or inconclusive trial results;~~

•failure of patients or investigators to comply with the clinical trial protocol;

~~lack of effectiveness or~~•unforeseen safety ~~of the product candidate;~~issues; and

•negative findings of inspections of clinical sites or manufacturing operations by us, the FDA or other ~~authorities of our clinical or manufacturing operations.~~

authorities.

~~We could encounter delays if a clinical~~

A trial ismay also be suspended or terminated by us, the trial’s data safety monitoring board, or the IRBs atgoverning the sites where the trial is being ~~conducted. The~~conducted or the FDA ~~or other regulatory authorities may suspend or terminate a trial~~ for many reasons, including failure to ~~conduct the trial in accordance~~comply with regulatory requirements or ~~our~~ clinical protocols, negative findings in an inspection ~~by the FDA or other authorities~~ of our clinical trial operations or ~~clinical~~ trial sites by the FDA or other authorities, unforeseen safety issues, failure to demonstrate a benefit ~~from using a product candidate~~ or changes in government regulations.

Disruptions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic increase the likelihood of delays in initiating or completing our planned and ongoing clinical trials, thereby increasing their costs. Please see the risk factor, “The COVID-19 pandemic has lengthened the time it takes to initiate and advance some of our clinical trials.”

During the ~~clinical~~ development of a product candidate, we may decide, or the FDA or other regulatory authorities may require us, to conduct more pre-clinical or clinical studies or ~~pre-clinical studies in addition~~ to ~~those we had planned, which could delay~~change the size or ~~prevent~~design of a trial already underway, thereby delaying or preventing the completion of ~~its~~ development ~~program or~~and increase its cost. Even if we conduct ~~all of~~ the clinical trials and supportive studies that we consider appropriate and the results are positive, we may not receive regulatory approval. Following regulatory approval, there are significant risks to its commercial success, such as development of ~~a product candidate.~~

competing products by other companies or the reluctance of physicians to prescribe it.

The COVID-19 pandemic has lengthened the time it takes to initiate and advance some of our clinical trials.

We ~~depend on third-parties~~conduct clinical trials at sites in the United States, Canada, Europe and Israel. In the United States, Canada and Europe, authorities have imposed significant public health restrictions of varying degrees of severity which are likely to ~~conduct~~persist as long as COVID-19 public health concerns remain. In addition, physicians, patients and ~~manage many~~medical institutions have changed their behavior in an attempt to reduce the risk of infection, which makes clinical trials more expensive, time-consuming and risky to initiate and conduct.

Some of the sites where we are conducting clinical trials have from time-to-time stopped enrolling new patients or reduced the frequency with which enrolled patients see their physicians. Some clinical sites have temporarily stopped initiating new trials. Many patients are reluctant to participate in procedures required by our clinical trial protocols because they fear infection. In general, COVID-19 has slowed the pace of our clinical trials, including our studies in Cushing’s syndrome and Antipsychotic-Induced Weight Gain (“AIWG”). Studies of diseases perceived to be acutely life-threatening, such as advanced solid tumors, have not experienced delay or disruption.

We may continue to experience disruptions from the COVID-19 pandemic, which could have a material adverse impact on our clinical trial plans and timelines, including:

•delays in enrolling patients or the loss of enrolled patients due to COVID-19 related restrictions;

•delays in clinical site initiation, including difficulties in recruiting clinical investigators and staff;

•delays in receiving authorizations from local regulatory authorities and internal review boards to initiate clinical trials or amend existing protocols;

•delays in clinical sites receiving necessary supplies and materials due to interruptions in local and global shipping;

•changes in local regulations that require us to change the ways in which our clinical trials are conducted, which may result in unexpected costs or cause us to suspend or discontinue a trial in the affected jurisdiction;

•diversion of healthcare resources, including facilities, supplies and staff, away from the conduct of clinical trials;

•interruption of key clinical trial activities, such as clinical trial site monitoring, patient visits and follow-up, study procedures and data collection, that could affect the integrity of clinical trial data, due to limitations on travel;

•the infection of patients enrolled in our clinical trials with COVID-19, which could affect the results of the clinical trial, including by increasing the number of observed adverse events or by causing patients to drop out of the study;

•patient discontinuations due to fear of infection with COVID-19 or public health restrictions implemented by clinical trial sites which make trial participation more time consuming or difficult;

•interruptions or delays in preclinical studies due to restricted or limited operations at laboratory facilities;

•delays in necessary interactions with local regulators, ethics committees and other third parties and contractors due to limitations in employee resources or the furlough of government employees; and

•limitations caused by the sickness of our employees or their families or the desire of employees to avoid contact with large groups of people.

The extent to which the COVID-19 pandemic affects our business, preclinical studies and clinical trials will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted with confidence.

Vendors perform many of the activities necessary to carry out our clinical trials, including drug product distribution, trial management and oversight and data collection and analysis. Failure of these ~~third-parties~~vendors to ~~carry out~~perform their ~~contractual~~ duties or meet expected timelines may prevent or delay ~~regulatory~~ approval of our product ~~candidates, which could substantially harm our business.~~

~~We rely on~~candidates.

Third-party clinical investigators and clinical sites to enroll patients and ~~third-parties such as~~ CROs to manage many of our trials and to perform ~~required~~ data collection and analysis. Although we control only certain aspects of these ~~third-parties’~~third parties’ activities, ~~our reliance on them does not relieve us of our regulatory responsibilities. We~~we are responsible for ensuring that ~~each of our studies is conducted in accordance with the prescribed~~every study adheres to its protocol and ~~in accordance with all applicable legal,~~meets regulatory and scientific standards. If we or any of the third-parties working with us fail to comply with applicable cGCPs, the clinical data generated in our trials may be deemed unreliable and the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities may require us to perform additional clinical trials before approval of our marketing applications. We cannot be certain that regulatory authorities will determine that our clinical trials comply with cGCP requirements. In addition, our clinical trials must use only drug product produced in accordance with cGMP regulations. Failure to comply with these regulations may require us to repeat clinical trials, which would delay regulatory approval. We may not be able to select and qualify appropriate sites for our trials. If our clinical sites fail to enroll a sufficient number of patients or fail to enroll them on schedule, we may be unable to complete our trials as planned, which could delay or prevent the clinical development of our product candidates.

Although we have agreements with the CROs and consultants helping to conduct our clinical trials, we may not be able to maintain relationships with them or with our clinical investigators or clinical sites. If any of our ~~agreements with these third-parties terminates, we may~~vendors does not ~~be able to enter into alternative arrangements on commercially reasonable terms, or at all. If the third-parties on which we rely do not carry out their contractual~~perform its duties or ~~fail to~~ meet expected deadlines or fails to adhere to applicable GCPs, or if the quality or accuracy of the data ~~they obtain~~it produces is compromised, ~~our~~affected clinical trials may be extended, delayed or terminated and we may be unable to obtain ~~regulatory~~ approval for our product candidates.

Failure of our manufacturing vendors to perform their duties or comply with cGMPs may require us to recall drug product or repeat clinical trials, which would delay regulatory approval. If our agreements with any of these vendors terminate, we may not be able to enter into alternative arrangements in a timely manner or on reasonable terms.

Our ability to physically inspect our vendors and clinical sites has been limited by the COVID-19 pandemic and associated public health restrictions, which increases the risk that failures to meet applicable requirements will go undetected.

We may be unable to obtain ~~and~~or maintain regulatory approvals for our product candidates, which would prevent us from commercializing our product candidates.

We ~~are not permitted to market or promote any products before we receive regulatory~~cannot sell a product without the approval ~~from~~of the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory ~~authorities. Although we have received FDA~~authority. Obtaining such approval to market Korlym to treat patients with Cushing’s syndrome, we may be unable to maintain such approval. We may not receive regulatory approval for any of our product candidates. Obtaining regulatory approval of a new drug is difficult, uncertain, lengthy and expensive. Failure can occur at any stage. In order to receive FDA approval ~~from the FDA~~ for a ~~product candidate,~~new drug, we must demonstrate to the FDA’s satisfaction that the new drug ~~product~~ is safe and effective for its intended use and that our manufacturing processes ~~for the product candidate~~ comply with ~~cGMPs, which govern production processes, quality control and recordkeeping.~~cGMPs. Our inability or the inability of our ~~suppliers~~vendors to comply with applicable FDA and other regulatory requirements can result in ~~among other things,~~ delays in or denials of new product approvals, warning letters, untitled letters, fines, consent decrees restricting or suspending manufacturing operations, injunctions, civil penalties, recall or seizure of products, total or partial suspension of product sales and criminal prosecution. ~~Any of these or other regulatory actions could materially harm our business and our financial condition.~~

Future governmental action or changes in FDA policy or personnel may also result in delays or rejection of an NDA in the United States. In addition, because the only other currently FDA-approved use of mifepristone is the termination of pregnancy, we expect that the label for mifepristone for any indication will include, as Korlym’s does, some limitations, including a so-called “black-box” warning that it should not be used by pregnant women or women seeking to become pregnant.

If we receive regulatory approval for our future product candidates, we will be subject to ongoing FDA obligations and continued regulatory oversight and review, such as continued safety reporting requirements; and we may also be subject to additional FDA post-marketing restrictions and obligations. If we are not able to maintain regulatory compliance, we may not be permitted to market our product candidates and may be subject to product recalls or seizures. Any regulatory approvals that we receive for our future product candidates may limit the indicated uses for which the medicine may be marketed or require costly post-marketing studies.

~~Failure to obtain regulatory approval in foreign jurisdictions would prevent us from commercializing our product candidates abroad.~~

We may seek to commercialize our products in international markets, ~~on our own or with the help of partners. Outside the United States, we may commercialize a product only if we~~which would require us to receive a marketing authorization and, in many cases, pricing approval, from the appropriate regulatory ~~authorities, whose approval processes include all of the risks associated with the FDA’s approval process, and, in some cases, additional risks. The approval procedure varies among~~authorities. Approval procedures vary between countries and can ~~involve~~require additional ~~testing. The time required to obtain~~pre-clinical or clinical studies. Obtaining approval may ~~differ from that required to obtain FDA approval.~~take longer than it does in the United States. Although approval by the FDA does not ensure approval by regulatory authorities in other countries, and approval by one foreign regulatory authority does not ensure approval by ~~regulatory authorities in other foreign countries or by the FDA,~~others, failure or delay in obtaining regulatory approval in one country may have a negative effect on the regulatory process in others. Any of these or other regulatory actions could materially harm our business and financial condition.

If we receive regulatory approval for a product candidate, we will be subject to ongoing requirements and oversight by the FDA and other regulatory authorities, such as continued safety and other reporting requirements, as well as post-approval marketing restrictions and additional costly clinical trials. If we are not able to maintain regulatory compliance, we may be required to stop development of a product candidate or to stop selling a product that has already been approved. We may also be subject to product recalls or seizures. Future governmental action or changes in regulatory authority policy or personnel may also result in delays or rejection of pending or anticipated product approvals.

Our products and product candidates may cause undesirable side effects that halt their clinical development, prevent their regulatory approval, limit their commercial potential or cause us significant liability.

Patients in clinical trials report changes in their health, including new illnesses, injuries, and discomforts, to their study doctor. Often, it is not ~~be able~~possible to ~~file for regulatory approvals and may~~determine whether or not ~~receive necessary approvals to commercialize~~these conditions were caused by the drug candidate being studied or something else. As we test our product candidates in ~~any foreign market. Although we have received Orphan Drug designation in the EU of Korlym to treat patients with Cushing’s syndrome, we are not currently seeking any foreign approvals.~~

~~We face competition from companies with financial, technical~~larger, longer and ~~marketing resources substantially greater than our own.~~

The biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries are intensely competitive and subject to rapid and significant technological change. Our present and potential competitors include major pharmaceutical companies, specialized pharmaceutical firms, universities and public and private research institutions. These competitors may develop and commercialize medications that are superior to and less expensive than ours. We expect competition to intensifymore extensive clinical trials, or as ~~technical advances are made.~~

~~Many of our competitors and potential competitors have greater experience, more financial and marketing resources and larger research and development staffs than we do. In addition, many~~use of them ~~either alone~~becomes more widespread if we receive regulatory approval, patients may report serious adverse events that did not occur or ~~together with their collaborative partners, have significantly greater experience than~~went undetected in previous trials. Many times, serious side effects are only detected in large-scale, Phase 3 clinical trials or following commercial approval.

Adverse events reported in clinical trials can slow or stop patient recruitment, prevent enrolled patients from completing a trial and could give rise to liability claims. Regulatory authorities could respond to reported adverse events by interrupting or

halting our clinical trials or limiting the scope of, delaying or denying marketing approval. If we ~~do in drug development, obtaining regulatory approvals, manufacturing and commercializing products. They may develop drugs that~~elect, or are ~~superior~~required by authorities, to ~~our product candidates, which could render our product candidates obsolete~~delay, suspend or ~~non-competitive.~~

~~Our~~terminate any clinical trial or commercialization efforts, ~~to discover, develop and commercialize product candidates beyond Korlym for~~ the ~~treatment~~commercial prospects of ~~patients with Cushing’s syndrome are at an early stage and we may fail to successfully commercialize any of them.~~

~~To develop additional sources of revenue, we must develop new~~such product candidates or new therapeutic uses for Korlym. Cortisol modulators may not be effective to treat any other disorders. We could discover that cortisol modulators have unacceptable side effects or are otherwise not safe. Due to the potential for lack of efficacy and side effects inherent in novel compounds and in new uses for existing medications, we are developing multiple compounds, which will increase our rate of spending, with no assurance that we will be successful in developing drugs that are safe and effective.

We only have significant clinical and commercial experience with mifepristone, the active ingredient in Korlym, and we may determine that mifepristone is not desirable for uses other than for the treatment of patients with Cushing’s syndrome. The compounds developed pursuant to our early discovery, preclinical and clinical research programs may fail to become approved medications, no matter how much management time and money we spend on their development. After a product candidate is identified, we may abandon further development efforts after expending significant expense and time due to financial constraints, concerns over safety or efficacy, marketing considerations, manufacturing difficulties or other reasons. Moreover, governmental authorities may enact new legislation or regulations that limit or restrict our development efforts. If we are unable to successfully discover and commercialize new uses for cortisol modulators, weproducts may be ~~unable to generate sufficient revenue to support our operations.~~

~~We will need to increase the size of our organization and we may experience difficulties in managing growth.~~

The development of our research and development efforts will be constrained by our administrative, operational and management resources. Growth will impose significant added responsibilities on members of management, including the need to recruit and retain additional employees. To date, we have relied on a small management team. Our future financial performanceharmed, and our ability to ~~compete effectively will depend~~generate product revenues from them may be delayed or eliminated.

If one of our product candidates receives marketing approval, and we or others later identify undesirable side effects or adverse events, potentially significant negative consequences could result, including but not limited to:

•regulatory authorities may suspend, limit or withdraw approvals of such product;

•regulatory authorities may require additional warnings on ~~our ability to manage growth effectively. To that end, we must:~~

~~manage our sales~~the label, including “boxed” warnings, or issue safety alerts and ~~marketing efforts, clinical trials, research and development activities and supply chain effectively;~~

other safety information about the product;

~~hire additional management, clinical development, administrative and sales and marketing personnel; and~~

~~develop our administrative, accounting and management information systems and controls.~~

~~Our failure to accomplish any of these tasks could harm our business.~~

~~If we lose our key personnel or are unable to attract and retain additional skilled personnel,~~ •we may be ~~unable~~required to ~~pursue~~change the way the product is administered or conduct additional studies or clinical trials;

•we may be required to create a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy, which could include a medication guide outlining the risks of such side effects for distribution to patients, a communication plan for healthcare providers and/or other elements to assure safe use;

•the product may become less competitive;

•we may be subject to fines, injunctions or the imposition of criminal penalties; and

•we could be sued and held liable for harm caused to patients;

Any of these events could seriously harm our ~~product development and commercialization efforts.~~

Our ability to operate successfully and manage our potential future growth depends significantly upon retaining key managerial, scientific, sales, marketing, and financial personnel, and attracting and retaining additional highly qualified personnel in these areas. We face intense competition for qualified personnel. We depend substantially on the principal members of our management and scientific staff. We do not have agreements with any of our executive officers that provide for their continued employment with us or employment insurance covering any of our key personnel. Any officer or employee can terminate his or her relationship with us at any time and work for one of our competitors. The loss of key individuals could delay our research, development and commercialization efforts.

business.

Risks Related to ~~Our~~our Capital Needs and Financial Results

We may need additional capital to ~~develop and commercialize Korlym~~fund our operations or for ~~additional indications or our selective cortisol modulators for any indication. Additional~~strategic reasons. Such capital may not be available on ~~favorable~~acceptable terms or at all.

~~Our~~

We are dependent on revenue from the sale of Korlym ~~revenues may be insufficient~~and our cash reserves to ~~fully~~ fund our commercial operations and development ~~of our proprietary selective cortisol modulators for any indication or for additional indications for Korlym. We~~programs. If Korlym revenue declines significantly, we may need to curtail our operations or raise funds to support our ~~research and development activities, for working capital or for other general corporate purposes, or to acquire or invest in businesses, products and technologies.~~

~~Factors affecting our ability to generate funds from the sale of Korlym include:~~

~~the pace at which physicians adopt Korlym as a treatment;~~

~~the willingness of insurance companies and government payors to provide prompt, complete reimbursement of Korlym; and~~

~~disputes concerning patents or proprietary rights, including announcements of claims of infringement, interference or litigation against us or our licensors.~~

plans. We may also choose to raise ~~additional capital~~funds for strategic ~~reasons, even if we believe our revenue can fully fund our current and future operating plans.~~reasons. We cannot be certain ~~that additional~~ funding will be available on acceptable terms or at all. ~~Our sales of common stock and warrants and the exercises of warrants have been dilutive to stockholders and any additional equity~~Equity financing ~~could~~would cause ~~further dilution. Debt~~dilution, debt financing ~~if available,~~ may involve restrictive covenants. Neither type of financing may be available to us on attractive terms or at all. If we obtain funds through collaborations with other companies, ~~those arrangements~~we may ~~be on unfavorable terms or may require us~~have to relinquish ~~certain~~ rights to ~~Korlym~~one or more of our product candidates. If our revenue declines and our cash reserves are depleted, and if adequate funds are not available from other sources, we may ~~be required~~have to delay, reduce the scope of, or eliminate one or more of our ~~research or~~ development ~~programs or~~programs.

Risks Relating to our Intellectual Property

To succeed, we ~~may be required to discontinue operations.~~

~~We have incurred substantial losses~~must secure, maintain and ~~may incur more.~~

~~We finance our operations through revenue from~~effectively assert adequate patent protection for the ~~sale~~composition and methods of ~~Korlym. Before 2016, we incurred substantial losses every year. We may incur additional losses.~~

~~Economic conditions could adversely affect our liquidity and financial condition.~~

Turbulence in the financial markets may cause lenders and institutional investors to stop providing credit to businesses such as ours or to greatly increase its cost, which could adversely affect our liquidity and financial condition. If our commercial activities do not generate enough cash to fully fund the operationuse of our business and we are unable to borrow funds or raise capital, we may need to find alternative ways to increase our liquidity. Such alternatives may include, without limitation, curtailing clinical or drug development activity or limiting our commercial efforts, which would have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations, cash flows and financial condition.

~~If we acquire other~~proprietary, selective cortisol modulators ~~or other technologies or potential products, we will incur a variety~~and for the use of ~~costs and may never realize the anticipated benefits of the acquisition.~~

~~If appropriate opportunities arise, we may attempt~~Korlym to ~~acquire products or product candidates that~~treat Cushing’s syndrome.

Patents are complementary to our operating plan. We currently have no commitments, agreements or plans for any acquisitions. Acquiring rights to another potential product or technology may result in unforeseen difficulties and expenditures and may absorb significant management attention that would otherwise be available for development of our existing business. We may fail to realize the anticipated benefits of any acquired potential product or technology. Acquisitions could dilute our stockholders’ ownership interest and could cause us to incur debt, expose us to future liabilities and result in amortization or other expenses related to goodwill and other intangible assets.

~~Risks Relating to Our Intellectual Property~~

If Korlym or our other product candidates conflict with the patents of others or if we become involved in other intellectual property disputes, we may have to engage in costly litigation or be forced to obtain a license or may be unable to commercialize our product candidates or Korlym for a new indication.

~~Patents in the pharmaceutical industry are highly~~ uncertain, involve complex legal and factual questions and are frequently the subject of ~~very costly~~ litigation. ~~Our product candidates~~The patents issued or licensed to us may ~~give rise to claims that~~be challenged at any time. Competitors may take actions we believe infringe our ~~patents or the patents we have licensed are invalid or that we infringe on the rights of others, which may cause~~intellectual property, causing us to ~~engage in costly litigation. If it is determined that~~take legal action to defend our ~~product candidates infringe others’ patent rights, we may be required to obtain licenses to those~~ rights. If we fail to obtain licenses when necessary, we may have to delay commercializing our product candidates while we attempt to design around the infringed patent. We could fail and may be unable to commercialize our product candidates. If we become involved in intellectualIntellectual property litigation weis lengthy, expensive and requires significant management attention. Outcomes are likely to incur considerable costs. We do not believe that we infringe any patents or other proprietary rights. We are not obligated to pay royalties relating to the use of intellectual property except to Stanford University and the University of Chicago. To maintain the exclusive license to these patents, we must make milestone and royalty payments to both universities.uncertain. If we do not comply with our obligations under our licenses, we may lose the right to commercialize cortisol modulators, including mifepristone, for the treatment of psychotic depression, cocaine-induced psychosis, early dementia, TNBC and CRPC.

Our success depends on our ability to obtain and maintain adequate patent protection for the composition of our proprietary, selective cortisol modulators and their methods of use and the use of Korlym to treat Cushing’s syndrome, TNBC and CRPC. If we do not adequately protect our intellectual property, competitors may erode our competitive advantage.

Please see “Part II, Item 1, Legal Proceedings.”

Our ~~patent applications and patents licensed or issued to us may be challenged by third-parties and our~~ patent applications may not result in issued ~~patents. Our presently pending and future patent applications may not issue as~~ patents and ~~any patent~~patents issued to us may be challenged, invalidated, held unenforceable or circumvented. Our ~~patent claims~~patents may not prevent ~~third-parties~~third parties from producing competing products. The foreign countries ~~in which~~where we may someday operate may not protect our intellectual property to the extent of the laws of the United ~~States.~~States do. If we fail to obtain adequate patent protection in other countries, ~~our competitors~~others may produce products in those countries ~~competing products~~ based on our ~~technology, which would impair our ability to succeed.~~

If a third-party successfully asserted an infringement claim against us, we could be forced to obtain an expensive license or pay damages and be prevented from developing, manufacturing or marketing our potential products. We do not have liability insurance for patent infringement. Patent litigation could consume a substantial portion of our resources and management time. Regardless of a claim’s merit, defending a lawsuit is expensive and diverts management’s attention from productive business.

~~Our ability to compete could be diminished if we are unable to protect our trade secrets and proprietary information.~~

In addition to patents, we rely on a combination of confidentiality, nondisclosure and other contractual provisions, laws protecting trade secrets and security measures to protect our proprietary information. These measures may not provide adequate protection, in which case third-parties could use our proprietary information to diminish our ability to compete. In addition, employees, consultants and others may breach their agreements with us regarding our proprietary information and we may not have adequate remedies for the breach.

The mifepristone patents that we own or license cover the use of mifepristone, not its composition, which may make it more difficult to prevent patent infringement if physicians prescribe another manufacturer’s mifepristone or if patients acquire mifepristone from other sources, such as the internet or underground market.

We own or have exclusively licensed issued U.S. patents covering the use of cortisol modulators to treat a variety of disorders, including TNBC and CRPC. A method of use patent covers only a particular use of a compound, not its composition. Because our patents do not cover the composition of mifepristone, we cannot prevent others from commercializing mifepristone to treat disorders not covered by our method of use patents. The availability of mifepristone for these disorders may enable patients to obtain mifepristone for indications covered by our patents. Although any such “off-label” use would violate our patents, effectively monitoring compliance and enforcing our rights may be difficult and costly. Patients may be able to purchase mifepristone through the internet or underground market. Mifepristone is sold in the United States by Danco Laboratories for the termination of pregnancy. Although distribution is limited to a single dose provided in the physician’s office and covered by other restrictions, we cannot be certain that patients with Cushing’s syndrome will not be able to obtain mifepristone from this or other sources, should another company receive approval to market mifepristone for another indication.

technology.

Risks Related to ~~Our~~our Stock

The ~~market~~ price of our common stock ~~has been~~fluctuates widely and is likely to continue to ~~be subject to wide fluctuations in price in response to various factors, many of which are beyond our control.~~do so. Opportunities for ~~the sale of~~investors to sell shares ~~at any given time~~ may be limited.

We cannot assure investors that ~~an active~~a liquid trading market for our common stock will exist at any particular time. ~~Holders~~As a result, holders of our common stock may not be able to sell shares quickly or at the current market ~~price if trading in our common stock is not active.~~price. During the 52-week period ended ~~October 30, 2017,~~April 28, 2022, our average daily trading volume was approximately ~~1,047,741~~937,877 shares and the intra-day sales prices per share of our common stock on The ~~NASDAQ Capital~~Nasdaq Stock Market ranged from ~~$6.70~~$15.82 to ~~$20.77.~~$25.68. As of ~~October 30, 2017,~~April 28, 2022, our officers, directors and principal stockholders ~~controlled 14~~beneficially owned approximately 19 percent of our common stock.

~~Stock markets, and the market for biotechnology and life sciences companies in particular, have experienced~~

Our stock price can experience extreme price and volume fluctuations that ~~have often been~~are unrelated or disproportionate to ~~the~~our operating performance ~~of these companies. This volatility may significantly reduce the market price of our common stock, regardless of our operating performance.~~or prospects. Securities ~~class-action litigation is~~class action lawsuits are often instituted against companies following periods of stock market volatility. ~~If instituted against us, such~~Such litigation ~~could result in substantial costs~~is costly and ~~diversion of~~diverts management’s ~~attention.~~

~~The~~attention from productive efforts.

Factors that may cause the price of our common stock ~~is volatile~~to fluctuate rapidly and ~~could fluctuate~~ widely ~~in response to a range of factors, many of which are beyond our control. Such factors~~ include:

•actual or anticipated variations in our ~~quarterly~~ operating ~~results;~~

results or changes ~~in estimates or recommendations by securities analysts or failure of our financial performance~~ to ~~meet the~~any public guidance we have ~~provided to the public;~~

provided;

•actual or anticipated timing and results of our clinical trials;

~~purchases~~•changes in the expected or ~~sales~~actual timing of our competitors’ development programs;

•general market and economic conditions, including the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic;

•disputes or other developments relating to our intellectual property, including developments in ANDA litigation and proceedings before the PTAB;

•short-selling of our common stock, the publication of speculative opinions about our business or other market manipulation activities that are intended to lower our stock price or increase its volatility;

•changes in estimates or recommendations by ~~us,~~securities analysts or the failure of our ~~officers, directors~~performance to meet the published expectations of those analysts or ~~our stockholders;~~

public guidance we have provided;

•actual or anticipated regulatory approvals of our product candidates or of competing products;

~~trading volume~~•purchases or sales of our common ~~stock;~~

stock by our officers, directors or stockholders;

~~our cash and short-term investment position;~~

~~changes in the expected or actual timing of our competitors’ potential development programs;~~

•changes in laws or regulations applicable to Korlym, our product candidates or our competitors’ products;

~~announcements of~~ •technological innovations by us, our collaborators or our competitors;

•conditions ~~or trends~~ in the ~~biotechnology and~~ pharmaceutical ~~industries;~~

~~changes in~~industry, including the market valuations of companies similar ~~companies;~~

to ours;

~~general market and economic conditions;~~

•additions or departures of key personnel;

~~disputes or other developments relating to proprietary rights, including patents, litigation matters and our ability to obtain patent protection for our technologies;~~

•announcements by us or our competitors of significant acquisitions, strategic partnerships, joint ventures, ~~collaborators~~collaborations or capital commitments; and

•additional financing activities.

Our stock price may decline if our financial performance does not meet the guidance ~~that~~ we have provided to the public, estimates published by research analysts or other investor expectations.

The guidance we provide as to our expected ~~2017~~2022 revenue is only an estimate of what we believe is realizable at the time we give such guidance. ~~Our~~It is difficult to predict our revenue and our actual results may vary ~~materially. There are inherent difficulties in predicting~~materially from our guidance. The effect on our business of the ~~amount of Korlym that will be sold. For example,~~COVID-19 pandemic is difficult to forecast. In addition, the rate of physician adoption of Korlym and the actions of government and private payers is uncertain. We may experience competition from generic versions of Korlym, which our public revenue guidance does not anticipate. We may not meet our financial guidance or other investor expectations for other reasons, including those arising from the risks and uncertainties described in this report and in our other public filings and public statements. Research analysts ~~have published~~publish estimates of our future revenue ~~estimates~~and earnings based on their own ~~analyses.~~analysis. The revenue guidance we provide may be one factor they consider when determining their estimates. ~~Readers~~

General Risk Factors

We need to increase the size of our organization and may experience difficulties in managing growth.

Our commercial and research and development efforts are constrained by our limited administrative, operational and management resources. To date, we have relied on a small management team. Growth will impose significant added

responsibilities on members of management, including the need to recruit and retain additional employees. Our financial performance and ability to compete will depend on our ability to manage growth effectively. To that end, we must:

•manage our sales and marketing efforts, clinical trials, research and manufacturing activities effectively;

•hire more management, clinical development, administrative and sales and marketing personnel; and

•continue to develop our administrative systems and controls.

Failure to accomplish any of these tasks, which are more difficult during the COVID-19 pandemic, could harm our business.

If we lose key personnel or are unable to attract more skilled personnel, we may be unable to pursue our product development and commercialization goals.

Our ability to operate successfully and manage growth depends upon hiring and retaining skilled managerial, scientific, sales, marketing and financial personnel. The job market for qualified personnel is intensely competitive and turnover rates have reached record highs within our industry and the geographical areas from which we recruit. We depend on the principal members of our management and scientific staff. Any officer or employee may terminate his or her relationship with us at any time and work for a competitor. We do not have employment insurance covering any of our personnel. The loss of key individuals could delay our research, development and commercialization efforts.

We are subject to government regulation and other legal obligations relating to privacy and data protection. Compliance with these requirements is complex and costly. Failure to comply could materially harm our business.

We and our partners are subject to federal, state and foreign laws and regulations concerning data privacy and security, including HIPAA and the EU General Data Protection Regulation, or the GDPR. These and other regulatory frameworks are evolving rapidly as new rules are enacted and existing ones updated and made more stringent.

In the United States, numerous federal and state laws and regulations, including state data breach notification laws, state health information privacy, laws, and federal and state consumer protection laws and regulations (e.g., Section 5 of the FTC Act), that govern the collection, use, disclosure, and protection of health-related and other personal information could apply to our operations or the operations of our partners. In addition, we may obtain health information from third parties (including research institutions from which we obtain clinical trial data) that are subject to privacy and security requirements under HIPAA. Depending on the facts and circumstances, we could be subject to criminal penalties if we knowingly obtain, use, or disclose individually identifiable health information maintained by a HIPAA-covered entity in a manner that is not authorized or permitted by HIPAA.

Even when HIPAA does not apply, according to the Federal Trade Commission or the FTC, violating consumers’ privacy or failing to take appropriate steps to keep consumers’ personal information secure may constitute unfair acts or practices in or affecting commerce in violation of Section 5(a) of the Federal Trade Commission Act. The FTC expects a company’s data security measures to be reasonable and appropriate in light of the sensitivity and volume of consumer information it holds, the size and complexity of its business, and the cost of available tools to improve security and reduce vulnerabilities. Individually identifiable health information is considered sensitive data that merits stronger safeguards.

In addition, certain state laws govern the privacy and security of health information in certain circumstances, some of which are more stringent than HIPAA and many of which differ from each other in significant ways and may not have the same effect, thus complicating compliance efforts. Failure to comply with these laws, where applicable, can result in the imposition of significant civil and/or criminal penalties and private litigation. For example, the California Confidentiality of Medical Information Act imposes restrictive requirements regulating the use and disclosure of health information and other personally identifiable information. Further, on June 28, 2018, California enacted the California Consumer Privacy Act, or the CCPA, which took effect on January 1, 2020. The CCPA creates individual privacy rights for California consumers and increases the privacy and security obligations of entities handling certain personal information. The CCPA provides for civil penalties for violations, as well as a private right of action for data breaches that is expected to increase data breach litigation. The CCPA may increase our compliance costs and potential liability. Further, the California Privacy Rights Act, or CPRA, recently passed in California. The CPRA will impose additional data protection obligations on covered businesses, including additional consumer rights processes, limitations on data uses, new audit requirements for higher risk data, and opt outs for certain uses of sensitive data. It will also create a new California data protection agency authorized to issue substantive regulations and could result in increased privacy and information security enforcement. The majority of the provisions will go into effect on January 1, 2023, and additional compliance investment and potential business process changes may be required. In the event that we are subject to or affected by HIPAA, the CCPA, the CPRA or other domestic privacy and data protection laws, any liability from

failure to comply with the requirements of these laws could adversely affect our financial condition. Similar laws have been passed in Virginia, Colorado and Utah, and have been proposed at the federal level and in other states, reflecting a trend toward more stringent privacy legislation in the United States.

The GDPR went into effect in 2018 and imposes stringent requirements for controllers and processors of personal data of individuals within the European Economic Area (“EEA”), particularly with respect to clinical trials. The GDPR provides that EEA member states may make their own further laws and regulations limiting the processing of health data, which could limit our ability to use and share personal data or could cause our costs to increase and harm our business and financial condition. In addition, the GDPR increases the scrutiny that clinical trial sites located in the EEA should apply to transfers of personal data from such sites to countries that are considered to lack an adequate level of data protection, such as the United States. Recent legal developments have also created complexity and compliance uncertainty regarding certain transfers of information from the EEA to the United States. For example, on June 16, 2020, the Court of Justice of the European Union, or the CJEU, limited how organizations could lawfully transfer personal data from the EEA to the United States by invalidating the EU-US Privacy Shield Framework for purposes of international transfers and imposing further restrictions on use of the standard contractual clauses, or SCCs. These restrictions include a requirement for companies to carry out a transfer impact assessment which, among other things, assesses the laws governing access to personal data in the recipient country and considers whether supplementary measures that provide privacy protections additional to those provided under SCCs will need to be implemented to ensure an essentially equivalent level of data protection to that afforded in the EEA. The European Commission (“EC”) issued revised SCCs on June 4, 2021 to account for the decision of the CJEU and recommendations made by the European Data Protection Board. The revised SCCs must be used for relevant new data transfers from September 27, 2021; existing standard contractual clauses arrangements must be migrated to the revised clauses by December 27, 2022. There is some uncertainty around whether the revised clauses can be used for all types of data transfers, particularly whether they can be relied on for data transfers to non-EEA entities subject to the GDPR. As supervisory authorities issue further guidance on personal data export mechanisms, including circumstances where the SCCs cannot be used, and/or start taking enforcement action, we could suffer additional costs, complaints and/or regulatory investigations or fines, and/or if we are otherwise unable to transfer personal data between and among countries and regions in which we operate, it could affect the manner in which we provide our services, the geographical location or segregation of our relevant systems and operations, and could adversely affect our financial results. The GDPR imposes substantial fines for breaches of data protection requirements, which can be up to four percent of global revenue for the preceding financial year or €20 million, whichever is greater, and it also confers a private right of action on data subjects for breaches of data protection requirements. Compliance with European data protection laws is a rigorous and time intensive process that may increase our cost of doing business, and despite those efforts, there is a risk that we may be subject to fines and penalties, litigation and reputational harm in connection with our European activities. From January 1, 2021, we have had to comply with the GDPR and separately the United Kingdom GDPR, which, together with the amended United Kingdom Data Protection Act 2018, retains the GDPR in United Kingdom national law, each regime having the ability to fine up to the greater of €20 million/ £17.5 million or 4% of global turnover. It is unclear how United Kingdom data protection laws and regulations will develop in the medium to longer term and these changes may lead to additional costs and increase our overall risk exposure. On June 28, 2021, the EC adopted an adequacy decision in favor of the United Kingdom, enabling data transfers from EU member states to the United Kingdom without additional safeguards. However, the United Kingdom adequacy decision will automatically expire in June 2025 unless the EC renews or extends that decision and remains under review by the Commission during this period.

Complying with U.S. and foreign privacy and security laws and regulations is complex and costly. Failure to comply by us or our vendors could subject us to litigation, government enforcement actions and substantial penalties and fines, which could harm our business.

We rely on information technology systems to conduct our business. A breakdown or breach of these systems or our failure to protect confidential information concerning our business, patients or employees could interrupt the operation of our business and subject us to liability.

We store valuable confidential information relating to our business, patients and employees on our computer networks and on the networks of our vendors. In addition, we rely heavily on internet technology, including video conference, teleconference and file-sharing services, to conduct business. Despite our security measures, our networks and the networks of our vendors are at risk of break-ins, installation of malware or ransomware, denial-of-service attacks, data theft and other forms of malfeasance by persons seeking to commit fraud or theft, which could result in unauthorized access to, and misuse of, our clinical data or other confidential information, including confidential information relating to our patients or employees. COVID-19 may increase our cybersecurity risks, due to our reliance on internet technology and the number of our employees that are working remotely, which may create additional opportunities for cybercriminals to exploit vulnerabilities.

We and our vendors have experienced data breaches, theft, “phishing” attacks and other unauthorized access to confidential data and information. Russia’s invasion of Ukraine or another war of international dispute may cause a general

increase in the number and severity of such malicious incidents. There can be no assurance that our cybersecurity systems and processes will prevent unauthorized access in the future that causes serious harm to us, our patients or employees. We may also experience security breaches that remain undetected for an extended period.

Disruptions or security breaches that result in the disclosure of confidential or proprietary information could cause us to incur liability and delay or otherwise harm our research, development and commercialization efforts. We may be liable for losses suffered by patients or employees or other individuals whose confidential information is stolen as a result of a breach of the security of the systems that we or third parties and our vendors store this information on, and any such liability could be material. Even if we are not liable for such losses, any breach of these systems could expose us to material costs in notifying affected individuals, as well as regulatory fines or penalties. In addition, any breach of these systems could disrupt our normal business operations and expose us to reputational damage and harm our business, operating results and financial condition. Any insurance we maintain against the risk of this ~~report should rely~~type of loss may not be sufficient to cover actual losses, or may not apply to the circumstances relating to any particular loss.

We are dependent on the continued functioning of the FDA and other federal instrumentalities. Their partial or complete closure, whether due to public health concerns or a budgetary dispute, or their diversion of significant resources to advance pandemic-related issues could materially harm our business.

The government’s ability to carry out its mandated functions is affected by a variety of factors, including diversion of resources and limited operating capacity caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as other events that may reduce the government’s ability to perform routine functions, such as inadequate funding, the inability to hire and retain key personnel, and statutory, regulatory and policy changes. If a prolonged government shutdown occurs, or if global health concerns continue to prevent the FDA or other regulatory authorities from conducting their regular inspections, reviews, or other regulatory activities, it could significantly impact the ability of the FDA or other regulatory authorities to timely review and process our regulatory submissions, which could have a material adverse effect on our ~~guidance~~business. Similarly, disruptions at the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) could temporarily stop its ability to review and approve proposed financing transactions.

Separately, in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, in March 2020, the FDA announced its intention to postpone most inspections of foreign manufacturing facilities and on March 18, 2020, the FDA temporarily postponed routine surveillance inspections of domestic manufacturing facilities. Subsequently, in July 2020, the FDA resumed certain on-site inspections of domestic manufacturing facilities subject to a risk-based prioritization system. The FDA utilized this risk-based assessment system to assist in determining when and where it was safest to conduct prioritized domestic inspections. Additionally, on April 15, 2021, the FDA began conducting voluntary remote interactive evaluations of certain drug manufacturing facilities and clinical research sites, among other facilities, in circumstances where the FDA determines that such remote evaluation would be appropriate based on mission needs and travel limitations. In July 2021, the FDA resumed standard inspections of domestic facilities, since that time, the FDA has continued to monitor and implement changes to its inspections to ensure the safety of its employees and those of the firms it regulates as it adapts to the evolving COVID-19 pandemic. Regulatory authorities outside the United States may adopt similar changes.If a prolonged government shutdown occurs, or if global health concerns continue to hinder or prevent the FDA or other regulatory authorities from conducting their regular inspections, reviews, or other regulatory activities, it could significantly impact the ability of the FDA or other regulatory authorities to timely review and process our regulatory submissions, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Changes in federal, state and local tax laws may reduce our net earnings.

Our earnings are subject to federal, state and local taxes. We offset a portion of our earnings using net operating losses and our taxes using research and development tax credits, which reduces the amount of tax we pay. Some jurisdictions require that we pay taxes or fees calculated as a percentage of sales, payroll expense, or other indicia of our activities. Please see “Part I, Item 1, Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements - Income Taxes.” Changes to existing tax laws could materially increase the amounts we pay, which would reduce our after tax net income.

We may face competition from companies with greater financial, technical and marketing resources than our own.

The pharmaceutical industry is competitive and subject to rapid technological change. Our potential competitors include large pharmaceutical companies and innovative biotechnology companies, many of which have greater clinical, marketing and sales resources than our own and may develop and commercialize medications that are superior to and less expensive than ours, which could negatively affect our financial results and the ~~estimates~~prospects of ~~research analysts at their own discretion.~~

our product candidates.

Research analysts may not continue to provide or initiate coverage of our common stock or may issue negative reports.

The market for our common stock may be affected by the reports financial analysts publish about us. If ~~one~~any of the analysts covering us downgrades or discontinues coverage of our stock, ~~its~~the price of our common stock could decline rapidly and significantly. ~~Securities analysts covering our common stock may discontinue coverage. A lack~~Paucity of research coverage may also adversely affect our ~~stock’s market~~stock price.

Sale of a substantial number of shares of our common stock may cause ~~the~~its price ~~of our common stock~~ to decline.

Sales of a substantial number of shares of our stock in the public market could reduce its price. As additional shares of our stock become available for ~~resale in the~~ public ~~market,~~resale, whether by the exercise of stock options by employees or directors or because of an equity financing by us, the supply of our stock will increase, which could cause its price to fall. Substantially all of the shares of our stock are eligible for sale, subject to applicable volume and other resale restrictions.

~~Our officers, directors and principal stockholders, acting as a group, could significantly influence corporate actions.~~

As of October 30, 2017, our officers and directors controlled 14 percent of our common stock. Acting together, these stockholders, could significantly influence any matter requiring approval by our stockholders, including the election of directors and the approval of mergers or other business combinations. The interests of this group may not always coincide with our interests or the interests of other stockholders and may prevent or delay a change in control. This significant concentration of share ownership may adversely affect the trading price of our common stock because many investors perceive disadvantages to owning stock in companies with controlling stockholders.

Changes in laws and regulations may significantly increase our costs or reduce our revenue, which could harm our financial results.

New laws and regulations, as well as changes to existing laws and regulations, including statutes and regulations concerning taxes and the development, approval, marketing and ~~marketing~~pricing of medications, the provisions of the ~~PPACA~~ACA requiring the reporting of aggregate spending related to health care professionals, the provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and rules adopted by the SEC and by The ~~NASDAQ Capital~~Nasdaq Stock Market have and will likely continue to increase our cost of doing ~~business. Complying with these regulations may increase our selling, general and administrative expenses~~business and divert management’s ~~time and~~ attention from revenue-generating activities.

If we acquire products or product candidates, we will incur significant costs and may not realize the benefits we anticipate.

We may acquire a product or product candidate that complements our strategic plan. Such an acquisition may give rise to unforeseen difficulties and costs and may absorb significant management attention. We may not realize the anticipated benefits of any acquisition, which could dilute our stockholders’ ownership interest or cause us to incur significant expenses and debt.

We may fail to comply with our public company obligations, including securities laws and regulations. Such compliance is costly and requires significant management attention.

~~We are a small company with limited resources.~~

The federal securities laws and regulations, including the corporate governance and other requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, impose complex and continually changing regulatory requirements on our operations and reporting. These developing requirements ~~have increased and~~ will continue to increase our ~~legal~~ compliance costs.

Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requires that we evaluate the effectiveness of, and provide a management report with respect to, our internal controls over financial reporting. It also requires that the independent registered public accounting firm auditing our consolidated financial statements must attest to and report on the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting. If we are unable to complete the required assessment and report ~~as to the adequacy of our internal control over financial reporting in~~ or if our independent registered public accounting firm is unable to ~~provide us with~~issue an unqualified ~~report~~opinion as to the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, investors could lose confidence in our financial ~~reporting.~~

~~Changes in or interpretations of accounting rules~~reporting and ~~regulations could result in unfavorable accounting charges or require us to change~~ our ~~accounting policies or operating practices.~~

Accounting methods and policies for business and marketing practices of pharmaceutical companies are subject to continual review, interpretation and guidance from accounting authorities, including the SEC. Although we believe that our accounting practices are consistent with current requirements, changes to accounting methods or policies may require us to reclassify, restate or otherwise change or revise our financial statements. Such changes could result in changes to the amounts or characterization of our assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses and income, which could harm our financial position and results of operations and could cause thestock price ~~of our common stock to decline~~.

would likely decline.

Anti-takeover provisions in our charter and bylaws and under Delaware law may make an acquisition of us or a change in our management more expensive or difficult, even if an acquisition or a management change would be beneficial to our stockholders.

Provisions in our charter and bylaws may delay or prevent an acquisition of us or a change in our management. Some of these provisions allow us to issue preferred stock without any vote or further action by the stockholders, require advance notification of stockholder proposals and nominations of candidates for election as directors and prohibit stockholders from acting by written consent. In addition, a supermajority vote of stockholders is required to amend our bylaws. Our bylaws provide that special meetings of the stockholders may be called only by our Chairman, President or the Board of Directors and that the authorized number of directors may be

changed only by resolution of the Board of Directors. These provisions may prevent or delay a change in our Board of Directors or our management, which our Board of Directors appoints. In addition, because we are incorporated in Delaware, we are governed by the provisions of Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law. Section 203 may prohibit large stockholders, in particular those owning 15 percent or more of our outstanding voting stock, from merging or combining with us. These provisions in our charter and bylaws and under Delaware law could reduce the price that investors would be willing to pay for shares of our common stock.

Our officers, directors and principal stockholders, acting as a group, could significantly influence corporate actions.

As of April 28, 2022, our officers and directors beneficially owned approximately 19 percent of our common stock. Acting together, these stockholders could significantly influence any matter requiring approval by our stockholders, including the election of directors and the approval of mergers or other business combinations. The interests of this group may not always coincide with our interests or the interests of other stockholders and may prevent or delay a change in control. This significant

concentration of share ownership may adversely affect the trading price of our common stock ~~and result~~because many investors perceive disadvantages to owning stock in ~~the market price being lower than it would otherwise be.~~

companies with controlling stockholders.

~~ITEM 2.~~

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

~~None.~~

There were no unregistered sales of equity securities during the period covered by this report.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

The following table contains information relating to the purchases of our common stock in the three months ended March 31, 2022 as part of the cashless net exercises of stock options (in thousands, except average price per share):


Fiscal Period	Total Number of Shares Purchased(1)	Average Price Per Share		Total Purchase Price of Shares(2)
January 1, 2022 to January 31, 2022	25	$	17.16	$	435
February 1, 2022 to February 28, 2022	94	22.51		2,126
March 1, 2022 to March 31, 2022	185	24.14		4,476
Total	305	$	23.05	$	7,037

(1) In January 2022, we issued 40,000 shares of common stock as part of a net-share settlement of a cashless option exercise, of which 25,350 shares were surrendered to us in satisfaction of related exercise cost and tax obligations. In February 2022, we issued 144,154 shares of common stock as part of net-share settlement of cashless option exercises, of which 94,461 shares were surrendered to us. In March 2022, we issued 256,809 shares of common stock as part of net-share settlement of cashless option exercises, of which 185,457 shares were surrendered to us.
(2) We paid $1.9 million to satisfy the tax withholding obligations associated with the net-share settlement of these cashless option exercises.

~~ITEM 3.~~

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

Not applicable.

~~ITEM 4.~~

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

None.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

~~ITEM 5.~~

~~OTHER INFORMATION~~

~~None.~~

~~ITEM 6.~~

EX~~HIBITS~~

~~Exhibit~~
Exhibit Number		Description of Document
3.1
~~3.1~~	Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on August 9, 2012).
3.2
~~3.2~~	Amended and Restated Bylaws (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 13, 2017)..
10.1
~~10.1†~~	~~Distribution Services~~Seventh Amendment to Office Lease Agreement ~~dated August 4, 2017,~~by and between Exponent Realty, LLC and Corcept Therapeutics Incorporated, made and ~~Optime Care, Inc.~~entered into as of March 18, 2022.
31.1
~~10.2†~~	~~Task Order Number One to Distribution Services Agreement, dated August 4, 2017, between Corcept Therapeutics Incorporated and Optime Care, Inc.~~

~~31.1~~	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications of Joseph K. Belanoff, M.D., Chief Executive Officer of the registrant.
31.2
~~31.2~~	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications of ~~G. Charles Robb,~~Atabak Mokari, Chief Financial Officer of the registrant.
32.1
~~32.1~~	18 U.S.C. Section 1350 Certifications of Joseph K. Belanoff, M.D., Chief Executive Officer of the registrant.
32.2
~~32.2~~	18 U.S.C. Section 1350 Certifications of ~~G. Charles Robb,~~Atabak Mokari, Chief Financial Officer of the registrant.
101
~~101~~	The following materials from the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended ~~September 30, 2017,~~March 31, 2022, formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL): (i) Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at ~~September 30, 2017~~March 31, 2022 and December 31, ~~2016,~~2021, (ii) Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the three ~~and nine~~ month periods ended ~~September 30, 2017~~March 31, 2022 and ~~2016,~~2021, (iii) Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the ~~nine~~three month periods ended ~~September 30, 2017~~March 31, 2022 and ~~2016,~~2021, (iv) Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity and ~~(iv)~~(v) Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
104		Cover Page Interactive Data File - the cover page XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document.

~~† Confidential treatment has been requested with respect to certain portions of the Distribution Services Agreement and related Task Order Number One.~~

~~SIGNATURES~~

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


		CORCEPT THERAPEUTICS INCORPORATED

Date: ~~November 2, 2017~~	May 5, 2022	/s/ Joseph K. Belanoff
		Joseph K. Belanoff, M.D.
		Chief Executive Officer

Date: ~~November 2, 2017~~	May 5, 2022	/s/ ~~G. Charles Robb~~ Atabak Mokari
	~~G. Charles Robb~~	Atabak Mokari
		Chief Financial Officer

Date:	May 5, 2022	/s/ Joseph D. Lyon
		Joseph D. Lyon
		Chief Accounting Officer


PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION		3
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS		3
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS		3
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME		4
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS		5
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY	6
NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS		6 7
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS		14 13
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK		18
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES		18
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION		19
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS		19
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS		19 21
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS		31 36
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES		31 36
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES		31 36
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION		31 36
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS		32 37
SIGNATURES		33 38

	Fair Value	Estimated Fair Value
	Hierarchy	September 30,		December 31,
	Level	2017		2016
		(in thousands)
Corporate bonds	Level 2	$	18,394	$	—
Commercial paper	Level 2		23,331		—
U.S. treasury securities	Level 1		7,778		—
Money market funds	Level 1		10,330		31,605
Total Marketable securities		$	59,833	$	31,605

Classified as:
Cash equivalents		$	14,229	$	31,605
Short-term marketable securities			44,096		—
Long-term marketable securities			1,508		—
Total marketable securities		$	59,833	$	31,605

	Lease
	Payments
2017 (remainder)	$	264
2018		1,256
2019		314
Thereafter		—
Total	$	1,834