Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically ~~and posted on its corporate Web site, if any,~~ every Interactive Data File required to be submitted ~~and posted~~ pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit ~~and post~~ such files). Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒

As of November ~~7, 2017,~~6, 2019, the registrant had ~~36,971,731~~36,347,337 outstanding shares of common stock, no par value.

The matters discussed in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, in the Company’s press releases and in the Company’s website-accessible conference calls with analysts and investor presentations include “forward-looking statements” about the plans, strategies, objectives, goals or expectations of SpartanNash Company and subsidiaries (“SpartanNash” or “the Company”). These forward-looking statements are identifiable by words or phrases indicating that SpartanNash or management “expects,” “anticipates,” “plans,” “believes,” or “estimates,” or that a particular occurrence or event “will,” “may,” “could,” “should” or “will likely” result, occur or be pursued or “continue” in the future, that the “outlook” or “trend” is toward a particular result or occurrence, that a development is an “opportunity,” “priority,” “strategy,” “focus,” that the Company is “positioned” for a particular result, or similarly stated expectations. Accounting estimates, such as those described under the heading “Critical Accounting Policies” in Part I, Item 2 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, are inherently forward-looking. The Company’s asset impairment and restructuring cost provisions are estimates and actual costs may be more or less than these estimates and differences may be material. Undue reliance should not be placed on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of the Quarterly Report, other report, release, presentation, or statement.

In addition to other risks and uncertainties described in connection with the forward-looking statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, SpartanNash’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December ~~31, 2016~~29, 2018 and other periodic reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), there are many important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially. These risks and uncertainties include general business conditions, changes in overall economic conditions that impact consumer spending, the Company’s ability to integrate acquired assets, the impact of competition and other factors which are often beyond the control of the Company, and other risks listed in the “Risk Factors” discussion in Item 1A of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December ~~31, 2016~~29, 2018 and risks and uncertainties not presently known to the Company or that the Company currently deems immaterial.

This section and the discussions contained in Item 1A “Risk Factors” of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December ~~31, 2016~~29, 2018 and in Part I, Item 2 “Critical Accounting ~~Policy”~~Policies” of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, are intended to provide meaningful cautionary statements for purposes of the safe harbor provision of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. This should not be construed as a complete list of all of the economic, competitive, governmental, technological and other factors that could adversely affect the Company’s expected consolidated financial position, results of operations or liquidity. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to SpartanNash or that SpartanNash currently believes are immaterial also may impair its business, operations, liquidity, financial condition and prospects. The Company undertakes no obligation to update or revise its forward-looking statements to reflect developments that occur, or information obtained after the date of this Quarterly Report.

	October 7,			December 31,			October 5,			December 29,
	2017			2016			2019			2018
Assets
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	13,154		$	24,351		$	23,436		$	18,585
Accounts and notes receivable, net		370,482			291,568			374,287			346,260
Inventories, net		598,493			539,857			594,676			553,799
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		33,426			37,187			52,176			73,798
Property and equipment held for sale		—			521			3,968			8,654
Total current assets		1,015,555			893,484			1,048,543			1,001,096

Property and equipment, net		588,416			559,722			618,126			579,060
Goodwill		178,392			322,686			181,035			178,648
Intangible assets, net		135,656			60,202			128,351			128,926
Operating lease assets								272,591			—
Other assets, net		115,755			94,242			85,900			84,182

Total assets	$	2,033,774		$	1,930,336		$	2,334,546		$	1,971,912

Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
Current liabilities
Accounts payable	$	440,590		$	372,432		$	456,991		$	357,802
Accrued payroll and benefits		60,632			75,333			59,472			57,180
Other accrued expenses		39,361			40,788			45,667			43,206
Current maturities of long-term debt and capital lease obligations		19,407			17,424
Current portion of operating lease liabilities								41,795			—
Current portion of long-term debt and finance lease liabilities								7,044			18,263
Total current liabilities		559,990			505,977			610,969			476,451

Long-term liabilities
Deferred income taxes		60,397			123,243			43,734			49,254
Postretirement benefits		16,564			16,266
Operating lease liabilities								273,631			—
Other long-term liabilities		39,330			45,768			30,861			50,463
Long-term debt and capital lease obligations		651,537			413,675
Long-term debt and finance lease liabilities								686,055			679,797
Total long-term liabilities		767,828			598,952			1,034,281			779,514

Commitments and contingencies (Note 8)

Shareholders’ equity
Common stock, voting, no par value; 100,000 shares authorized; 36,974 and 37,539 shares outstanding		508,570			521,984
Preferred stock, no par value, 10,000 shares authorized; no shares outstanding		—			—
Common stock, voting, no par value; 100,000 shares authorized; 36,350 and 35,952 shares outstanding								489,656			484,064
Preferred stock, no par value, 10,000 shares authorized; 0 shares outstanding								—			—
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(11,373	)		(11,437	)		(748	)		(15,759	)
Retained earnings		208,759			314,860			200,388			247,642
Total shareholders’ equity		705,956			825,407			689,296			715,947

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	2,033,774		$	1,930,336		$	2,334,546		$	1,971,912

	12 Weeks Ended								40 Weeks Ended
	October 7,				October 8,				October 7,				October 8,			12 Weeks Ended						40 Weeks Ended
	2017				2016				2017				2016			October 5, 2019			October 6, 2018			October 5, 2019			October 6, 2018
Net sales	$	1,906,644			$	1,800,085			$	6,203,857			$	5,906,416		$	1,999,808		$	1,886,730		$	6,538,112		$	6,167,756
Cost of sales		1,644,952				1,544,790				5,313,763				5,054,180			1,709,447			1,630,588			5,581,015			5,302,740
Gross profit		261,692				255,295				890,094				852,236			290,361			256,142			957,097			865,016

Operating expenses
Selling, general and administrative		228,489				220,339				782,659				740,138			273,286			228,583			900,160			773,844
Merger/acquisition and integration		2,392				2,427				7,031				4,237			—			521			1,364			3,531
Goodwill impairment		189,027				—				189,027				—
Restructuring charges and asset impairment		35,626				2,662				36,633				23,714			1,296			232			10,215			5,269
Total operating expenses		455,534				225,428				1,015,350				768,089			274,582			229,336			911,739			782,644

Operating (loss) earnings		(193,842	)			29,867				(125,256	)			84,147
Operating earnings																	15,779			26,806			45,358			82,372

Other (income) and expenses
Other expenses and (income)
Interest expense		6,130				4,419				19,128				14,678			7,375			7,082			27,952			22,828
Loss on debt extinguishment																	329			—			329			—
Postretirement benefit expense (income)																	10,221			(6	)		19,677			(20	)
Other, net		(75	)			(146	)			(248	)			(416	)		(180	)		(189	)		(1,071	)		(635	)
Total other expenses, net		6,055				4,273				18,880				14,262			17,745			6,887			46,887			22,173

(Loss) earnings before income taxes and discontinued operations		(199,897	)			25,594				(144,136	)			69,885			(1,966	)		19,919			(1,529	)		60,199
Income taxes		(76,445	)			8,864				(56,809	)			25,635
Income tax (benefit) expense																	(1,656	)		2,374			(1,973	)		12,381
(Loss) earnings from continuing operations		(123,452	)			16,730				(87,327	)			44,250			(310	)		17,545			444			47,818

Loss from discontinued operations, net of taxes		(54	)			(82	)			(125	)			(268	)		(27	)		(80	)		(126	)		(238	)
Net (loss) earnings	$	(123,506	)		$	16,648			$	(87,452	)		$	43,982		$	(337	)	$	17,465		$	318		$	47,580

Basic (loss) earnings per share:
(Loss) earnings from continuing operations	$	(3.31	)		$	0.45			$	(2.32	)		$	1.18		$	(0.01	)	$	0.49		$	0.01		$	1.33
Loss from discontinued operations		(0.01	)	*		(0.01	)	*		(0.01	)	*		(0.01	)		—			—			—			(0.01	)
Net (loss) earnings	$	(3.32	)		$	0.44			$	(2.33	)		$	1.17		$	(0.01	)	$	0.49		$	0.01		$	1.32

Diluted (loss) earnings per share:
(Loss) earnings from continuing operations	$	(3.31	)		$	0.45			$	(2.32	)		$	1.18		$	(0.01	)	$	0.49		$	0.01		$	1.33
Loss from discontinued operations		(0.01	)	*		(0.01	)	*		(0.01	)	*		(0.01	)		—			—			—			(0.01	)
Net (loss) earnings	$	(3.32	)		$	0.44			$	(2.33	)		$	1.17		$	(0.01	)	$	0.49		$	0.01		$	1.32

12 Weeks Ended

40 Weeks Ended

October 7,

October 8,

October 7,

October 8,

2017

2016

2017

2016

Net (loss) earnings
$

(123,506
)

$

16,648

$

(87,452
)

$

43,982

Other comprehensive income, before tax

Pension and postretirement liability adjustment

31

1

103

4

Total other comprehensive income, before tax

31

1

103

4

Income tax expense related to items of other comprehensive income

(12
)

—

(39
)

(1
)

Total other comprehensive income, after tax

19

1

64

3

Comprehensive (loss) income
$

(123,487
)

$

16,649

$

(87,388
)

$

43,985

							Accumulated
							Other
	Shares			Common			Comprehensive			Retained
	Outstanding			Stock			Income (Loss)			Earnings			Total
Balance at December 29, 2018		35,952		$	484,064		$	(15,759	)	$	247,642		$	715,947
Impact of adoption of new lease standard (ASU 2016-02)					—			—			(26,863	)		(26,863	)
Net earnings		—			—			—			7,469			7,469
Other comprehensive income		—			—			60			—			60
Dividends - $0.19 per share		—			—			—			(6,902	)		(6,902	)
Stock-based employee compensation		—			5,383			—			—			5,383
Issuances of common stock on stock option exercises and for stock bonus plan and associate stock purchase plan		30			452			—			—			452
Issuances of restricted stock		444			—			—			—			—
Cancellations of stock-based awards		(107	)		(1,744	)		—			—			(1,744	)
Balance at April 20, 2019		36,319		$	488,155		$	(15,699	)	$	221,346		$	693,802
Net loss		—			—			—			(6,814	)		(6,814	)
Other comprehensive income		—			—			6,767			—			6,767
Dividends - $0.19 per share		—			—			—			(6,902	)		(6,902	)
Stock-based employee compensation		—			715			—			—			715
Issuances of common stock for associate stock purchase plan		8			99			—			—			99
Issuances of restricted stock		22			—			—			—			—
Cancellations of stock-based awards		(15	)		(22	)		—			—			(22	)
Balance at July 13, 2019		36,334		$	488,947		$	(8,932	)	$	207,630		$	687,645
Net loss		—			—			—			(337	)		(337	)
Other comprehensive income		—			—			8,184			—			8,184
Dividends - $0.19 per share		—			—			—			(6,905	)		(6,905	)
Stock-based employee compensation		—			637			—			—			637
Issuances of common stock for associate stock purchase plan		8			88			—			—			88
Issuances of restricted stock		16			—			—			—			—
Cancellations of stock-based awards		(8	)		(16	)		—			—			(16	)
Balance at October 5, 2019		36,350		$	489,656		$	(748	)	$	200,388		$	689,296

							Accumulated
							Other
	Shares			Common			Comprehensive			Retained
	Outstanding			Stock			Income (Loss)			Earnings			Total
Balance at December 30, 2017		36,466		$	497,093		$	(15,136	)	$	239,993		$	721,950
Net earnings		—			—			—			12,343			12,343
Other comprehensive income		—			—			84			—			84
Dividends - $0.18 per share		—			—			—			(6,526	)		(6,526	)
Share repurchase		(952	)		(20,000	)		—			—			(20,000	)
Stock-based employee compensation		—			5,290			—			—			5,290
Issuances of common stock for stock bonus plan and associate stock purchase plan		24			470			—			—			470
Issuances of restricted stock		472			—			—			—			—
Cancellations of stock-based awards		(87	)		(1,567	)		—			—			(1,567	)
Balance at April 21, 2018		35,923		$	481,286		$	(15,052	)	$	245,810		$	712,044
Net earnings		—			—			—			17,772			17,772
Other comprehensive income		—			—			63			—			63
Dividends - $0.18 per share		—			—			—			(6,457	)		(6,457	)
Stock-based employee compensation		—			977			—			—			977
Issuances of common stock for associate stock purchase plan		4			104			—			—			104
Issuances of restricted stock		9			—			—			—			—
Cancellations of stock-based awards		(2	)		(37	)		—			—			(37	)
Balance at July 14, 2018		35,934		$	482,330		$	(14,989	)	$	257,125		$	724,466
Net earnings		—			—			—			17,465			17,465
Other comprehensive income		—			—			63			—			63
Dividends - $0.18 per share		—			—			—			(6,469	)		(6,469	)
Share repurchase		—			—			—			—			—
Stock-based employee compensation		—			773			—			—			773
Issuances of common stock for associate stock purchase plan		6			98			—			—			98
Issuances of restricted stock		1			—			—			—			—
Cancellations of stock-based awards		(3	)		(26	)		—			—			(26	)
Balance at October 6, 2018		35,938		$	483,175		$	(14,926	)	$	268,121		$	736,370

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED ~~STATEMENT~~STATEMENTS OF ~~SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY~~CASH FLOWS

Accumulated

Other

Shares

Common

Comprehensive

Retained

Outstanding

Stock

Income (Loss)

Earnings

Total

Balance at December 31, 2016

37,539

$

521,984

$

(11,437
)

$

314,860

$

825,407

Net loss

—

—

—

(87,452
)

(87,452
)
Other comprehensive income

—

—

64

—

64

Dividends - $0.495 per share

—

—

—

(18,649
)

(18,649
)
Share repurchase

(862
)

(22,500
)

—

—

(22,500
)
Stock-based employee compensation

—

8,593

—

—

8,593

Issuances of common stock on stock option
exercises and stock bonus plan

172

3,697

—

—

3,697

Issuances of restricted stock

296

—

—

—

—

Cancellations of stock-based awards

(171
)

(3,204
)

—

—

(3,204
)
Balance at October 7, 2017

36,974

$

508,570

$

(11,373
)

$

208,759

$

705,956

	40 Weeks Ended
	October 5, 2019			October 6, 2018
Cash flows from operating activities
Net earnings	$	318		$	47,580
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax		126			238
Earnings from continuing operations		444			47,818
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operating activities:
Non-cash restructuring, asset impairment, and other charges		16,108			5,496
Loss on debt extinguishment		329			—
Depreciation and amortization		69,588			64,457
Non-cash rent		(5,685	)		(818	)
LIFO expense		3,762			2,349
Pension settlement expense		18,244			—
Postretirement benefits expense		2,837			852
Deferred taxes on income		(1,735	)		9,584
Stock-based compensation expense		6,735			7,040
Postretirement benefit plan contributions		(514	)		(1,771	)
Gain on disposals of assets		(6,648	)		(108	)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		(26,697	)		(17,852	)
Inventories		(10,813	)		2,098
Prepaid expenses and other assets		(10,911	)		155
Accounts payable		84,817			35,490
Accrued payroll and benefits		(3,624	)		(5,917	)
Other accrued expenses and other liabilities		3,797			(6,327	)
Net cash provided by operating activities		140,034			142,546
Cash flows from investing activities
Purchases of property and equipment		(46,905	)		(52,600	)
Net proceeds from the sale of assets		16,456			6,568
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired		(86,659	)		—
Loans to customers		(3,384	)		(948	)
Payments from customers on loans		3,327			1,456
Other		(480	)		(9	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(117,645	)		(45,533	)
Cash flows from financing activities
Proceeds from senior secured revolving credit facility		922,679			764,934
Payments on senior secured revolving credit facility		(871,033	)		(809,058	)
Proceeds from other long-term debt		5,800			—
Repayment of other long-term debt and finance lease liabilities		(66,813	)		(6,461	)
Financing fees paid		(708	)		(106	)
Proceeds from resolution of acquisition contingencies		15,000			—
Share repurchase		—			(20,000	)
Net payments related to stock-based award activities		(1,782	)		(1,630	)
Proceeds from exercise of stock options		181			—
Dividends paid		(20,709	)		(19,452	)
Net cash used in financing activities		(17,385	)		(91,773	)
Cash flows from discontinued operations
Net cash used in operating activities		(153	)		(234	)
Net cash used in discontinued operations		(153	)		(234	)
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents		4,851			5,006
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		18,585			15,667
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	23,436		$	20,673

40 Weeks Ended

October 7,

October 8,

2017

2016

Cash flows from operating activities

Net (loss) earnings
$

(87,452
)

$

43,982

Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax

125

268

(Loss) earnings from continuing operations

(87,327
)

44,250

Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) earnings to net cash provided by operating activities:

Non-cash goodwill/asset impairment, restructuring, and other charges

225,101

22,938

Depreciation and amortization

66,366

60,436

LIFO expense

2,474

2,130

Postretirement benefits expense

1,276

157

Deferred taxes on income

(62,257
)

(715
)
Stock-based compensation expense

8,593

7,010

Other, net

(86
)

(234
)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

Accounts receivable

(44,737
)

(5,628
)
Inventories

(49,442
)

(44,115
)
Prepaid expenses and other assets

(3,546
)

(42,287
)
Accounts payable

42,842

52,496

Accrued payroll and benefits

(19,881
)

(6,653
)
Postretirement benefit payments

(280
)

(256
)
Other accrued expenses and other liabilities

(7,533
)

(8,395
)
Net cash provided by operating activities

71,563

81,134

Cash flows from investing activities

Purchases of property and equipment

(55,292
)

(57,215
)
Net proceeds from the sale of assets

3,928

5,650

Acquisitions, net of cash acquired

(226,412
)

—

Loans to customers

(1,005
)

(1,962
)
Payments from customers on loans

1,904

1,697

Other

(279
)

(706
)
Net cash used in investing activities

(277,156
)

(52,536
)
Cash flows from financing activities

Proceeds from revolving credit facility

1,160,066

1,013,812

Payments on revolving credit facility

(918,425
)

(1,004,077
)
Share repurchase

(22,500
)

(9,000
)
Net payments related to stock-based award activities

(3,204
)

(2,229
)
Repayment of other long-term debt

(5,795
)

(7,071
)
Financing fees paid

(256
)

(99
)
Proceeds from exercise of stock options

3,207

1,032

Dividends paid

(18,649
)

(16,873
)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

194,444

(24,505
)
Cash flows from discontinued operations

Net cash used in operating activities

(48
)

(414
)
Net cash used in discontinued operations

(48
)

(414
)
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents

(11,197
)

3,679

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

24,351

22,719

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$

13,154

$

26,398

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) and include the accounts of SpartanNash Company and its subsidiaries (“SpartanNash” or “the Company”). Intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December ~~31, 2016.~~29, 2018.

In the opinion of management, the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, contain all adjustments, including normal recurring items, necessary to present fairly the financial position of SpartanNash as of October ~~7, 2017,~~5, 2019, and the results of its operations and cash flows for the interim periods presented. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of results for a full year.

The unaudited information in the condensed consolidated financial statements for the third quarter and year to date periods of ~~2017~~2019 and ~~2016~~2018 include the results of operations of the Company for the 1212- and 40-week periods ended October ~~7, 2017~~5, 2019 and October ~~8, 2016,~~6, 2018, respectively.

Note 2 – Adoption of New Accounting Standards and Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In ~~January 2017,~~February 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) ~~2017-04, “Intangibles – Goodwill~~2016-02, “Leases.” The FASB subsequently issued ASUs 2018-01, 2018-10, 2018-11, and Other: Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment.” ASU 2017-04 simplifies the subsequent measurement of goodwill by eliminating Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test. If a reporting unit fails Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test, entities are no longer required to compute the implied fair value of goodwill following the same procedure that would be required in determining the fair value of assets acquired2019-01, which include clarifications and liabilities assumed in a business combination. Instead, the guidance requires an entity to perform its annual or interim goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amountprovide various practical expedients and to recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value. The Company early adopted this guidance as of the beginning of the third quarter of fiscal 2017.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-01, “Business Combinations – Clarifying the Definition of a Business.” ASU 2017-01 narrows the definition of a business and provides a screen to determine when a set of the three elements of a business – inputs, processes, and outputs – are not a business. The screen requires that when substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired (or disposed of) is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or a group of similar identifiable assets, the set is not a business. If the screen is not met, the amendments (1) require that to be considered a business, a set must include, at a minimum, an input and a substantive process that together significantly contribute to the ability to create output and (2) remove the evaluation of whether a market participant could replace missing elements. The amendments provide a framework to assist entities in evaluating whether both an input and a substantive process are present. The new guidance is effective for the Company in the fiscal year ending December 29, 2018. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adoption of this standard on its consolidated financial statements.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, “Compensation – Stock Compensation: Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting.” ASU 2016-09 provides for simplification of several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions including income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, accounting for forfeitures, and classification on the statement of cash flows. The Company adopted the new standard in the first quarter of fiscal 2017. Accordingly the tax benefits or deficienciestransition options related to stock-based compensation are reflected in the condensed consolidated statements of operations as a component of the provision for income taxes, whereas they previously were recognized in equity. As a result of the adoption, the Company recognized $1.3 million of tax benefits related to share-based payments in its provision for income taxes in 2017. Additionally, the Company’s condensed consolidated statements of cash flows now include tax benefits as an operating activity, while cash paid on associates’ behalf related to shares withheld for tax purposes is classified as a financing activity. Retrospective application of the cash flow presentation resulted in $2.6 million increases to both net cash provided by operating activities and net cash used in financing activities, respectively, for the year-to-date period ended October 8, 2016. The Company’s stock compensation expense continues to reflect estimated forfeitures.

~~In February 2016, the FASB issued~~ ASU ~~2016-02, “Leases.”~~2016-02. ASU 2016-02 provides guidance for lease accounting and stipulates that lessees ~~will~~ need to recognize a right-of-use asset and a lease liability for substantially all leases (other than leases that meet the definition of a short-term lease). The liability ~~will be~~is equal to the present value of ~~lease~~future rent payments. Treatment in the consolidated statements of operations ~~will be~~is similar to the ~~current~~previous treatment of operating and capital leases.

In the first quarter of 2019, the Company adopted this standard retrospectively through a cumulative-effect adjustment recorded at the beginning of 2019. The ~~new~~Company has elected the practical expedient available under the guidance ~~is effective on a modified retrospective basis for~~to not adjust comparative periods presented. In addition, the Company elected the package of practical expedients permitted under the transition guidance within the new standard, which among other things, allow for a carry forward of the historical lease classification. The Company elected the hindsight practical expedient to reevaluate the lease term for existing leases. The election of the hindsight practical expedient resulted in the extension or reduction of lease terms for certain existing leases and adjustments to the useful lives of corresponding leasehold improvements. In the application of hindsight, the Company estimated the expected lease term based on management’s plans, including the performance of the leased properties and the associated market dynamics in relation to the overall operational, real estate and capital planning strategies of the Company.

The adoption of the new standard resulted in the recognition of operating lease assets and liabilities of $241.8 million and $292.3 million, respectively, as of the beginning of 2019. The adoption of the standard also resulted in a transition adjustment to beginning of the year retained earnings of $26.9 million (net of deferred tax impact of $8.5 million). The transition adjustment relates to impairment of right of use assets included in previously impaired asset groups and the impact of hindsight on the evaluation of lease term. Remaining differences between lease assets and liabilities relate to the derecognition of lease-related liabilities and assets recorded under ASC 840, which were included in beginning lease liabilities or assets under ASC 842.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, “Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments”. ASU 2016-13 changes the impairment model for most financial assets and certain other instruments. Entities will be required to use a forward-looking “expected loss” model that will replace the current “incurred loss” model, which will generally result in the earlier recognition of credit losses. The Company is required to adopt this update in the first quarter of ~~its~~ fiscal ~~year ending December 28, 2019.~~2020. The ~~adoption~~Company is currently reviewing the provisions of ~~this ASU will result in~~the new standard and establishing revised processes and controls to estimate expected losses for trade and other receivables. The standard is not expected to have a significant ~~increase to~~impact on the Company’s consolidated ~~balance sheets~~financial statements.

The following table provides information about disaggregated revenue by type of products and customers for ~~lease liabilities~~each of the Company’s reportable segments:

	12 Weeks Ended October 5, 2019								40 Weeks Ended October 5, 2019
(In thousands)	Food Distribution		Military		Retail		Total		Food Distribution		Military		Retail		Total
Type of products:
Center store (a)	$	280,762	$	240,531	$	220,879	$	742,172	$	904,532	$	776,972	$	711,405	$	2,392,909
Fresh (b)		339,932		143,339		212,923		696,194		1,112,553		486,562		694,812		2,293,927
Non-food (c)		299,480		113,666		91,116		504,262		965,517		392,296		310,129		1,667,942
Fuel		—		—		36,362		36,362		—		—		115,947		115,947
Other		18,873		1,620		325		20,818		61,066		5,267		1,054		67,387
Total	$	939,047	$	499,156	$	561,605	$	1,999,808	$	3,043,668	$	1,661,097	$	1,833,347	$	6,538,112
Type of customers:
Individuals	$	—	$	—	$	561,430	$	561,430	$	—	$	—	$	1,832,704	$	1,832,704
Manufacturers, brokers and distributors		40,878		473,388		—		514,266		142,785		1,584,266		—		1,727,051
Retailers		882,904		24,148		—		907,052		2,852,064		71,564		—		2,923,628
Other		15,265		1,620		175		17,060		48,819		5,267		643		54,729
Total	$	939,047	$	499,156	$	561,605	$	1,999,808	$	3,043,668	$	1,661,097	$	1,833,347	$	6,538,112

	12 Weeks Ended October 6, 2018								40 Weeks Ended October 6, 2018
(In thousands)	Food Distribution		Military		Retail		Total		Food Distribution		Military		Retail		Total
Type of products:
Center store (a)	$	291,830	$	247,804	$	175,773	$	715,407	$	938,460	$	804,939	$	576,629	$	2,320,028
Fresh (b)		341,846		134,612		159,444		635,902		1,132,676		448,794		535,619		2,117,089
Non-food (c)		288,759		116,271		76,317		481,347		905,868		394,807		254,180		1,554,855
Fuel		—		—		34,576		34,576		—		—		110,018		110,018
Other		17,748		1,535		215		19,498		60,092		4,956		718		65,766
Total	$	940,183	$	500,222	$	446,325	$	1,886,730	$	3,037,096	$	1,653,496	$	1,477,164	$	6,167,756
Type of customers:
Individuals	$	—	$	—	$	446,110	$	446,110	$	—	$	—	$	1,476,446	$	1,476,446
Manufacturers, brokers and distributors		44,805		479,523		—		524,328		153,673		1,598,191		—		1,751,864
Retailers		881,776		19,164		—		900,940		2,837,036		50,349		—		2,887,385
Other		13,602		1,535		215		15,352		46,387		4,956		718		52,061
Total	$	940,183	$	500,222	$	446,325	$	1,886,730	$	3,037,096	$	1,653,496	$	1,477,164	$	6,167,756

(a) Center store includes dry grocery, frozen and beverages.
(b) Fresh includes produce, meat, dairy, deli, bakery, prepared proteins, seafood and floral.
(c) Non-food includes general merchandise, health and beauty care, tobacco products and pharmacy.

In the ordinary course of business, the Company ~~is currently evaluating~~may advance funds to certain independent retailers which are earned by the ~~other effects of adoption of this ASU on its consolidated financial statements.~~

~~In May 2014,~~retailers primarily through achieving specified purchase volume requirements, as outlined in their supply agreements with the ~~FASB issued ASU 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers.” The new guidance affects any reporting organization that either enters into contracts with customers to transfer goods~~Company, or ~~services~~in limited instances, for remaining a SpartanNash customer for a specified time period. These advances must be repaid if the purchase volume requirements are not met or ~~enters into contracts~~if the retailer no longer remains a customer for the specified time period. For volume-based arrangements, the Company estimates the amount of the advanced funds earned by the retailers based on the expected volume of purchases by the retailer and amortizes the advances as a reduction of the transaction price and revenue earned. These advances are not considered contract assets under ASC 606 as they are not generated through the transfer of ~~nonfinancial assets unless those contracts are within the scope of other standards. The standard’s core principle is that a company will recognize revenue when it transfers promised~~ goods or services to ~~customers~~the retailers. These advances are included in ~~an amount~~Prepaid expenses and other current assets or Other assets, net on the Company’s balance sheets.

When the Company transfers goods or services to a customer, payment is due - subject to normal terms - and is not conditional on anything other than the passage of time. Typical payment terms range from due upon receipt to 30 days, depending on the type of customer and relationship. At contract inception, the Company expects that ~~reflects~~ the ~~consideration~~period of time between the transfer of goods to ~~which~~ the ~~company expects to be entitled in exchange~~customer and when the customer pays for those goods ~~or services. In August 2015,~~will be less than one year, which is consistent with the ~~FASB issued ASU 2015-14, “Deferral of~~Company’s standard payment terms. Accordingly, the ~~Effective Date,” which results in~~Company has elected the ~~guidance being effective~~practical expedient under ASC 606 to not adjust for the effects of a significant financing component. As such, these amounts are recorded as receivables and not contract assets. The Company in the first quarter of its fiscal year ending December 29, 2018. The adoption will include updates as provided under ASU 2016-08, “Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net);” ASU 2016-10, “Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing;” and ASU 2016-12, “Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients.” Adoption is allowed by either the full retrospective or modified retrospective approach.had 0 contract assets for any period presented.

The Company ~~is currently in the process~~does not typically incur incremental costs of ~~evaluating the impact of adoption of this standard on its consolidated financial statements~~obtaining a contract that are contingent upon successful contract execution and has substantially completed its initial evaluation of the major focus areas that could impact the Company. From a principal versus agent considerations perspective, the Company has evaluated its significant arrangements and has determined that revenue recognition on a gross reporting basis will remain relatively unchanged, with the exception of a few smaller contracts that couldwould therefore be reported on a net basis depending on the nature of the arrangements and management’s final assessment. As it pertains to the Food Distribution and Military segments, the Company determined that the promised goods or services other than grocery products outlined in the contracts with customers are immaterial in the context of the contracts. As a result of this determination, the Company is not required to assess whether these promised goods or services are performance obligations, and therefore, believes revenue recognition practices will remain relatively unchanged as there are no additional deliverables for which the transaction price will need to be allocated. Many of these contracts also include contingent amounts of variable consideration, and the Company expects there to be few, if any, changes to the timing of revenue as the Company currently recognizes these amounts under the presumption that they are determinable and can be estimated. The Company also expects there to be few, if any, changes to revenue recognition in its Retail segment based on how the Company currently records gift card breakage and loyalty rewards, which are immaterial to the consolidated financial statements.

On ~~January 6, 2017,~~December 31, 2018, the Company acquired ~~certain assets and assumed certain liabilities~~all of ~~Caito Foods Service~~the outstanding shares of Martin’s Super Markets, Inc. (“~~Caito”) and Blue Ribbon Transport (“BRT”~~Martin’s”) for ~~$214.6~~$86.7 million, ~~in cash,~~ net of ~~$2.5~~$7.8 million of cash acquired. Acquired assets consist primarily of property and equipment of ~~$77.5~~$55.0 million, intangible assets of ~~$72.9~~$20.9 million, and working capital. Intangible assets are primarily composed of an indefinite-lived trade name of $17.6 million and customer ~~relationships,~~lists of $3.1 million which ~~will be~~are amortized over fifteen years, and indefinite lived trade names. In connection with the purchase, the Company is providing certain earn-out opportunities that have the potential to pay the sellers an additional $27.4 million, collectively, if the business achieves certain performance targets during the first three years after acquisition. If certain performance targets are not met in the first year after acquisition, the Company will be reimbursed a portion of the initial purchase price at an amount not to exceed the sum of: a) $15.0 million, representing the funds paid into escrow, and b) any earn-out opportunities earned by the sellers. The reduction in purchase price, if applicable, will first be applied to funds paid into escrow and then as an offset against and a reduction to any payments owed on the various earn-out opportunities. The acquisition was funded with proceeds from the Company’s Credit Agreement. As of October 7, 2017, the Company has incurred $4.9 million of costs related to the acquisition, of which $2.7 million was incurred in 2017, and is recorded in merger/acquisition and integration expense.

Founded in Indianapolis in 1965, Caito is a leading supplier of fresh fruits and vegetables as well as value-added meal solutions to grocery retailers and food service distributors across 21 states in the Southeast, Midwest and Eastern United States. BRT offers temperature-controlled distribution and logistics services throughout North America. Caito and BRT service customers from facilities in Indiana and Florida. Caito also has a fresh cut fruit and vegetable facility in Indianapolis and a new 118,000 square foot Fresh Kitchen facility, also in Indianapolis. The Fresh Kitchen provides the Company with the ability to process, cook, and package fresh protein-based foods and complete meal solutions. The Company has begun production in the Fresh Kitchen facility and is in the process of ramping up to full production. The Company acquired Caito and BRT to strengthen its fresh product offerings to its existing customer base and to expand into fast-growing, value-added services, such as freshly-prepared centerplate and side dish categories.

seven years. The acquired assets and assumed liabilities were recorded at their estimated fair values as of the acquisition date ~~and were~~ based on preliminary estimates. These estimates are subject to revision upon the finalization of the valuations of the acquired real estate, inventory and intangible assets. ~~Additional~~Any adjustments ~~if any,~~ will be made prior to ~~January~~December 31, 2019. NaN goodwill was recorded related to the acquisition. As of October 5, ~~2018. During the third quarter of fiscal 2017,~~2019, the Company ~~increased goodwill by $0.8~~has incurred $2.4 million of merger/acquisition and integration costs related to ~~reflect~~the acquisition, of which $1.2 million was incurred in 2019. The acquisition was funded with proceeds from the Company’s Credit Agreement.

Martin’s currently operates 21 stores in Northern Indiana and Southwest Michigan with approximately 3,500 employees. Martin’s was an ~~updated valuation of certain acquired long-lived assets. The excess~~independent retailer and customer of the ~~purchase price over~~Company’s Food Distribution segment prior to the ~~fair value of net assets acquired, currently estimated at $46.0 million, was recorded as goodwill in~~acquisition. Subsequent to the ~~consolidated balance sheet and allocated to~~acquisition sales from the Food Distribution ~~segment.~~segment to Martin’s stores are eliminated. The ~~goodwill recognized is attributable primarily~~acquisition expanded the footprint of the Company’s Retail segment into adjacent geographies in northern Indiana and southwestern Michigan.

Refer to ~~the assembled workforce of Caito~~Note 8 for further information related to current year acquisitions.

The Company ~~expects that all~~has 3 reporting units; however, 0 goodwill ~~attributable to~~exists within the ~~acquisition will be deductible for tax purposes.~~

Military or Retail reporting units. Changes in the carrying amount of goodwill within the Food Distribution reporting unit were as follows:

The Company reviews goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment annually, during the fourth quarter of each ~~fiscal~~ year, and more frequently if circumstances indicate ~~the possibility~~a risk of impairment. Testing goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment requires management to make significant estimates about the Company’s future performance, cash flows, and other assumptions that can be affected by potential changes in economic, industry or market conditions, business operations, competition, or the Company’s stock price and market capitalization. ~~On the first day of the third quarter of fiscal 2017, the~~

The Company ~~early adopted ASU 2017-04, which simplifies the subsequent measurement of goodwill by eliminating Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test.~~

During the 12 weeks ended October 7, 2017, the Company experienced significantly lower than expected Retail operating results and, due to an increasingly competitive retail environment and the related pricing pressureshas indefinite-lived intangible assets that are ~~anticipated to negatively impact gross margin, operating profit,~~not amortized, consisting primarily of indefinite-lived trade names and ~~future cash flows, revised its future projections~~licenses for the ~~Retail reporting unit. As a result~~sale of the lower than previously estimated Retail operating results, the Company performed Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test by calculating the fair value of the Retail reporting unit based on its discounted estimated future cash flows. The Company then benchmarked the calculated fair value against a market approach using the guideline public companies method. Given there has been a sustained declinealcoholic beverages. Changes in the ~~market multiples~~carrying amount of ~~publicly traded peer companies, management considered this market information when assessing the reasonableness of the fair value of the reporting unit under both the income and market approaches.~~indefinite-lived intangible assets were as follows:

Based on the factors outlined above, together with the results of the Step 1 goodwill impairment test, it was determined that the carrying value of the Retail segment exceeded its fair value. Consequently, the Company recorded an estimated goodwill impairment charge of $189.0 million. The measurement of the fair value of the Retail segment requires significant judgments and estimates regarding short- and long-term growth rates and profitability, as well as assumptions regarding the market valuation of the business. These represent Level 3 valuation inputs under the ASC 820 fair value hierarchy, as further described in Note 7 – Fair Value Measurements. Due to the complexity and effort required to estimate the fair value of the reporting unit, the fair value estimates were based on preliminary analysis and assumptions that are subject to change. The measurement of impairment will be completed in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017 as the Company performs its annual impairment test for the Food Distribution reporting unit as well as a market capitalization reconciliation to assess the reasonableness of the fair values determined for each of the reporting units.

~~The Food Distribution reporting unit has a fair value that is substantially in excess of its carrying value.~~

The following table provides the activity of reserves for closed properties for ~~fiscal 2017.~~the 40-week period ended October 5, 2019. Reserves for closed properties recorded in the condensed consolidated balance sheets are included in “Other accrued expenses” in Current liabilities and “Other long-term liabilities” in Long-term liabilities based on the timing of when the obligations are expected to be paid.

	Lease and									Lease and
(In thousands)	Ancillary Costs			Severance			Total			Ancillary Costs			Severance			Total
Balance at December 31, 2016	$	21,932		$	—		$	21,932
Balance at December 29, 2018										$	16,386			—		$	16,386
Reclassification of lease liabilities											(8,177	)		—			(8,177	)
Lease termination adjustments											(62	)		—			(62	)
Provision for closing charges		886			—			886			629			—			629
Provision for severance		—			620			620			—			347			347
Lease termination adjustments		(1,910	)		—			(1,910	)
Changes in estimates		1,141						1,141			(750	)		—			(750	)
Accretion expense		408			—			408			235			—			235
Payments		(5,045	)		(452	)		(5,497	)		(3,191	)		(149	)		(3,340	)
Balance at October 7, 2017	$	17,412		$	168		$	17,580
Balance at October 5, 2019										$	5,070		$	198		$	5,268

Included in the liability are lease-related ancillary costs from the date of closure to the end of the remaining lease term. Prior to the adoption of ASU 2016-02 (Note 2), the liability included lease obligations recorded at the present value of future minimum lease payments, calculated using a risk-free interest rate, ~~and related ancillary costs from the date of closure to the end of the remaining lease term,~~ net of estimated sublease income. Upon the adoption of ASU 2016-02, these liabilities were reclassified as a reduction of the initial measurement of operating lease assets within the consolidated balance sheets.

Restructuring and asset impairment ~~charges~~activity included in the condensed consolidated statements of operations consisted of the following:

	12 Weeks Ended					40 Weeks Ended						12 Weeks Ended						40 Weeks Ended
	October 7,		October 8,			October 7,			October 8,			October 5,			October 6,			October 5,			October 6,
(In thousands)	2017		2016			2017			2016			2019			2018			2019			2018
Asset impairment charges	$	33,158	$	2,059		$	33,678		$	5,542		$	1,447		$	570		$	15,512		$	2,040
Charge on customer advance													—			—			1,941			—
Provision for closing charges		481		375			886			13,546			86			596			629			4,499
Loss on sales of assets related to closed facilities		238		—			912			266
Loss (gain) on sales of assets related to closed facilities													72			(171	)		(6,831	)		(1,578	)
Provision for severance		76		—			620			895			198			3			347			142
Other costs associated with distribution center and store closings		532		268			1,306			3,371			330			203			1,307			799
Changes in estimates		1,141		(40	)		1,141			394			(539	)		(969	)		(750	)		(633	)
Lease termination adjustments		—		—			(1,910	)		(300	)		(298	)		—			(1,940	)		—
	$	35,626	$	2,662		$	36,633		$	23,714		$	1,296		$	232		$	10,215		$	5,269

~~Asset~~In the 12- and 40-week periods ended October 5, 2019 and October 6, 2018, restructuring and asset impairment charges were ~~substantially all~~ incurred ~~on long-lived assets~~ in the Food Distribution and Retail ~~segment~~segments due to the changes in the estimates in the fair value of assets within certain of the Company’s operations and the economic and competitive environment of certain stores and in conjunction with the Company’s retail store and supply chain rationalization ~~plan.~~plans. The charge on the customer advance relates to an advance to an independent retailer customer which was not fully recoverable. The changes in estimates relate to revised estimates of lease ~~and~~ ancillary costs ~~and sublease income~~ associated with previously closed locations, due to ~~lost subtenants~~favorable dispute resolutions with landlords and ~~deterioration of~~decreases in the ~~condition~~amount of certain ~~properties. The lease termination adjustments represent the benefits recognized in connection with lease buyouts negotiated related~~ancillary costs. Gains on sales of assets relate primarily to previously closed ~~stores.~~distribution centers in the Food Distribution and Military segments in the current 40-week period and prior year 40-week period, respectively.

~~Long-lived~~In the second quarter of 2019 the Company announced a plan to reposition the Caito Fresh Production operations and to focus on traditional produce distribution and production of fresh cut produce and deli items. As a result of this plan, the Company evaluated the related indefinite-lived trade name and long-lived assets for potential impairment. The indefinite-lived trade name with a book value of $35.5 million was measured at a fair value of $21.5 million, resulting in an impairment charge of $14.0 million. The Company concluded the long-lived assets were not impaired. Indefinite lived intangible assets are tested for impairment at least annually, and as needed if an indicator of potential impairment exists. Indefinite lived intangible assets are measured at fair value ~~on a nonrecurring basis~~ using Level 3 inputs under the fair value hierarchy, as further described in Note 7 – Fair Value Measurements. Fair value of indefinite-lived assets is determined by estimating the amount and timing of net future cash flows, discounted using a risk-adjusted rate of interest. The Company estimates future cash flows based on historical results of operations, external factors expected to impact future performance and, in the case of indefinite-lived trade name assets, estimated royalty rates.

Long-lived assets are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis using Level 3 inputs. Assets with a book value of ~~$48.6~~$5.9 million were measured at a fair value of ~~$14.9~~$4.4 million, resulting in impairment charges of $1.5 million in 2019. Assets with a book value of $1.8 million were measured at a fair value of $0.3 million, resulting in an impairment charge of ~~$33.7~~$1.5 million in ~~2017.~~2018. Fair value of long-lived assets is determined by estimating the amount and timing of net future cash flows, discounted using a risk-adjusted rate of interest. The Company estimates future cash flows based on historical results of operations, external factors expected to impact future performance, experience and knowledge of the geographic area in which the assets are located, and when necessary, uses real estate brokers.

~~Long-term debt consists of~~ Assets classified as held for sale in the ~~following:~~

~~Subsequent to~~consolidated balance sheet are valued at the end of the third quarter of fiscal 2017, the Company paid the outstanding balance on the Senior secured term loan of $52.2 million with proceeds from its Senior secured revolving credit facility. As a result of this transaction, annual interest expense is expected ~~to be reduced through a reduction of the average interest rates paid.~~net proceeds.

Financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents, accounts and notes receivable, accounts payable and long-term debt. The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, accounts and notes receivable, and accounts payable approximate fair value because of the short-term maturities of these financial instruments. See Note 5 for discussion of the fair value measurements related to long-lived asset impairment charges and Note 4 for discussion of the fair value measurements related to goodwill. At October 7, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the book value and estimated fair value of the Company’s debt instruments, excluding debt financing costs, were as follows:

~~The estimated fair value of debt is based on market quotes for instruments with similar terms and remaining maturities (Level 2 inputs and valuation techniques).~~

ASC 820 prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into the following hierarchy:

Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2: Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly.

Level 3: Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, reflecting the reporting entity’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing.

Financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents, accounts and notes receivable, accounts payable and long-term debt. The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, accounts and notes receivable, and accounts payable approximate fair value because of the short-term maturities of these financial instruments. See Note 6 for discussion of the fair value measurements related to long-lived asset impairment charges. At October 5, 2019 the book value and estimated fair value of the Company’s debt instruments, excluding debt financing costs, were as follows:

12The estimated fair value of debt is based on market quotes for instruments with similar terms and remaining maturities (Level 2 inputs and valuation techniques).

Certain of the Company’s business combinations involve the potential for the receipt or payment of future contingent consideration upon the shortfall or achievement of various operating thresholds, respectively. The additional consideration is generally contingent on the acquired company reaching certain performance ~~milestones, including attaining specified EBITDA levels. For business combinations including contingent consideration provisions an~~milestones. An asset or liability is recorded for the estimated fair value of the contingent consideration on the acquisition ~~date. The fair value of the contingent consideration~~date and is remeasured at each reporting period, using Level 3 inputs, with the change in fair value recognized as income or expense within operating expenses in the condensed consolidated statements of ~~income. The Company measures~~operations. As of October 5, 2019, the ~~asset~~probability of future payment related to existing contingent consideration provisions, which extend through the end of fiscal 2019, is remote and ~~liability on a recurring basis using Level 3 inputs.~~

~~The fair value~~there is no further opportunity for additional receipt of contingent consideration, ~~is measured using projected payment dates, discount rates, probabilities of payment, and projected EBITDA. Projected contingent payment~~therefore no assets or ~~receipt amounts~~liabilities are discounted back to the current period using a discounted cash flow model. Projected EBITDA amounts are based on initial deal model forecasts at the time of acquisition as well as the Company’s most recent internal operational budget, and include a probability weighted range of outcomes. Changes in projected EBITDA, probabilities of payment, discount rates, or projected payment dates may result in higher or lower fair value measurements. The recurring Level 3 fair value measurements of contingent consideration include the following significant unobservable inputs as of October 7, 2017:

The fair value of contingent consideration receivable and payable associated with the Caito and BRT acquisition was $18.4 million and $3.4 million, respectively, as of October 7, 2017. The net receivable of $15 million was recorded ~~in other assets, net~~ in the condensed consolidated balance ~~sheets as there is a right~~sheet. During 2019, the Company received $15.0 million related to the resolution of ~~offset for~~certain acquisition contingencies associated with the ~~payable~~Caito Foods Service, Inc. and ~~receivable.~~Blue Ribbon Transport, LLC acquisition. Upon ~~payment,~~receipt of the proceeds, the portion of the contingent consideration related to the acquisition date fair value iswas reported as a financing activity in the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows. Amounts received ~~or paid~~ in excess of the acquisition date fair value ~~are~~were reported as an operating activity in the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows.

The Company is engaged from time-to-time in routine legal proceedings incidental to its business. The Company does not believe that these routine legal proceedings, taken as a whole, will have a material impact on its business or financial condition. While the ultimate effect of such actions cannot be predicted with certainty, management believes that their outcome will not result in an adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, operating results or liquidity.

~~From time to time, the~~The Company may advance funds to independent retailers which are earned by the retailers primarily through achieving specified purchase volume requirements, as outlined in their supply agreements with the Company, or in limited instances, for remaining a SpartanNash customer for a specified time period. These advances must be repaid if the purchase volume requirements are not met or if the retailer no longer remains a customer for the specified time period. AsThe Company had previously advanced funds to 1 independent retailer who subsequently defaulted on the terms of ~~October 7, 2017,~~the supply agreement and went into receivership.To realize its collateral, the Company ~~has~~obtained the rights to acquire 5 stores, of which the rights related to 3 of the stores were assigned to an ~~unearned advance to one~~ independent retailer in exchange for ~~an amount representing approximately two percent~~certain consideration as part of a long-term supply agreement and the Company acquired the 2 remaining stores. Both the execution of the ~~Company’s total~~long-term supply agreement and the acquisition of 2 stores occurred during the second quarter of 2019. The excess of the purchase price over the fair value of net assets ~~and also has outstanding receivables from this customer~~acquired of $2.4 million was recorded as goodwill in the ~~amount of $6.2 million; the Company has established a reserve of $4.8 million given the past due status on those receivables. The Company’s collateral related~~consolidated balance sheet and allocated to the advanced funds is a security interest in select business assets of the independent retailer’s stores, including select real property assets and other collateral, including personal guarantees, from the shareholders. However, the Company may be unable to recover the entire unearned portion of the funds advanced to this independent retailer. The Company is currently involved in an ongoing state law proceeding pursuing recovery of amounts owed. BasedFood Distribution segment based on the ~~uncertainty associated with estimating the~~relative value of the ~~collateral~~assets acquired and the ~~risks related to taking possession of~~expected cash flows between the Retail and divesting the secured business assets, the Company cannot reasonably estimate the amount of advanced funds, if any, that should be reserved. The Company estimates that the possible range of loss related to this customer, including past due amounts, is between zero and $25.0 million, depending on the circumstances discussed above.Food Distribution segments.

The Company contributes to the Central States Southeast and Southwest Pension Fund (“Central States Plan” or “the Plan”), a multi-employer pension plan, based on obligations arising from its collective bargaining agreements (“CBAs”) in Bellefontaine, Ohio, Lima, Ohio, and Grand Rapids, Michigan covering its supply chain associates at those locations. This Plan provides retirement benefits to participants based on their service to contributing employers. The benefits are paid from assets held in trust for that purpose. Trustees are appointed by contributing employers and unions; however, SpartanNash is not a trustee. The trustees typically are responsible for determining the level of benefits to be provided to participants, as well as for such matters as the investment of the assets and the administration of the plan. The Company currently contributes to the Central States Plan under the terms outlined in the “Primary Schedule” of Central States’ Rehabilitation Plan or those outlined in the “Default Schedule.” Both the Primary and Default schedules require varying increases in employer contributions over the previous year’s contribution. Increases are set within the ~~collective bargaining agreement~~CBAs and vary by location. The Plan continues to be in red zone status, ~~which~~and according to the Pension Protection Act (“PPA”), is considered to be in ~~critical status as red~~“critical and declining” zone ~~status~~status. Among other factors, plans in the “critical and declining” zone are generally less than 65% ~~funded.~~

funded and are projected to become insolvent within the next 15 years (or 20 years depending on the ratio of active-to-inactive participants). Based on the most recent information available to the Company, management believes that the present value of actuarial accrued liabilities in this multi-employer plan significantly exceeds the value of the assets held in trust to pay benefits. Because SpartanNash is ~~one~~1 of a number of employers contributing to this plan, it is difficult to ascertain what the exact amount of the underfunding would be. Management is not aware of any significant change in funding levels since December ~~31, 2016.~~29, 2018. To reduce this underfunding, management expects ~~meaningful~~ increases in expense as a result of required incremental multi-employer pension plan contributions in future years. Any adjustment for withdrawal liability will be recorded when it is probable that a liability exists and can be reasonably determined.

A portion of the Company’s retail stores and warehouses operate in leased facilities. The Company also leases the majority of the tractors and trailers within its fleet and certain other assets. Most of the real property leases contain multiple renewal options, which generally range from one to ten years. In those locations in which it is economically feasible to continue to operate, management expects that lease options will be exercised. The terms of certain leases contain provisions requiring payment of percentage rent based on sales and payment of executory costs such as property taxes, utilities, insurance, maintenance and other occupancy costs applicable to the ~~existing collective bargaining agreement between~~leased premises or, in the case of transportation equipment, provisions requiring payment of variable rent based upon miles driven. Certain properties or portions thereof are subleased to others. As most of the Company’s leases do not provide an implicit discount rate, the Company uses an incremental borrowing rate based on the information available at commencement date in determining the present value of lease payments.

Supplemental cash flow and ~~union representing its associates in the Grand Rapids distribution center have been mutually extended by the parties through December 2, 2017.~~ other information related to leases was as follows:

The ~~parties have agreed to continue negotiations in an effort to reach agreement on a longer term collective bargaining agreement.~~Company’s maturities of lease liabilities under operating and finance leases as of October 5, 2019 are as follows:

During the ~~12 weeks~~12- and 40- week periods ended October ~~7, 2017~~5, 2019, the Company recognized net periodic postretirement benefit costs of $10.1 million and $19.3 million, respectively, related to the SpartanNash Company Pension Plan (“Pension Plan”) and $0.1 million and $0.3 million, respectively, related to the SpartanNash Retiree Medical Plan. During the 12- and 40- week periods ended October ~~8, 2016,~~6, 2018, the Company recognized net periodic pension income of $0.1 million and ~~$0.2~~$0.3 million, respectively, ~~related to the SpartanNash Company Pension Plan~~ and net periodic postretirement benefit costs of $0.1 million and $0.4 million, respectively for the aforementioned plans. Substantially all of these amounts are included in ~~both periods related~~Postretirement benefit expense (income) in the condensed consolidated statements of operations.

On February 28, 2018, the Company’s Board of Directors granted approval to proceed with terminating the ~~SpartanNash Medical~~frozen Pension Plan.

~~For~~ The Plan was terminated on July 31, 2018. The Company offered participants the 40option to receive an annuity or lump sum distribution which may be rolled over into another qualified plan. The distribution of assets to plan participants commenced in the second quarter and was completed in the third quarter of 2019. The Company has incurred pre-tax settlement charges in the amount of $18.2 million to recognize the deferred losses in AOCI upon distribution of the Plan assets, of which $9.4 million was recognized in the 12 weeks ended October ~~7, 2017 and October 8, 2016, the~~5, 2019. The Company also recognized ~~net periodic pension income~~other termination expenses of ~~$0.5 and $0.8 million, respectively, related to the SpartanNash Company Pension Plan and net postretirement benefit costs of $0.3~~$1.3 million in ~~both periods related to~~2019. The Company expects the ~~SpartanNash Medical Plan.~~Plan termination will reduce administrative fees and premium funding costs in future periods.

The Company did ~~not~~0t make any contributions to the ~~SpartanNash Company~~ Pension Plan during the ~~40 weeks~~40-week period ended October ~~7, 2017.~~5, 2019. The remaining overfunded Plan assets will be utilized by the Company to fund obligations associated with other qualified retirement programs. The Company ~~does not expect, and is not required,~~expects to make ~~any~~total contributions ~~for~~of $0.4 million in 2019 to the ~~remainder of~~Retiree Medical Plan and has made $0.3 million in the ~~fiscal year ending December 30, 2017.~~year-to-date period.

The Company’s retirement programs also include defined contribution plans providing contributory benefits, as well as executive compensation plans for a select group of management personnel and/or highly compensated associates.

In addition to the plans listed above, the Company participates in the Central States Southeast and Southwest Pension Fund, ~~(EIN 7456500),~~ the Michigan Conference of Teamsters and Ohio Conference of Teamsters Health and Welfare plans (collectively referred to as “multi-employer plans”), and other company-sponsored defined contribution plans for most associates covered by collective bargaining agreements.

With respect to the Company’s participation in the Central States Plan, expense is recognized as contributions are funded. The Company’s contributions ~~for~~during the ~~40 weeks~~12-week periods ended October ~~7, 2017~~5, 2019 and October ~~8, 2016~~6, 2018 were ~~$10.2~~$2.4 million and$2.1 million, respectively. The Company’s contributions during the 40-week periods ended October 5, 2019 and October 6, 2018 were $10.6 million and ~~$10.1~~$10.0 million, respectively. See Note 8 for further information regarding contingencies related to the Company’s participation in the Central States Plan.

The effective income tax rate was ~~38.2%~~84.2% and ~~34.6%~~11.9% for the 12 weeks ended October ~~7, 2017~~5, 2019 and October ~~8, 2016,~~6, 2018, respectively. For the 40 weeks ended October ~~7, 2017~~5, 2019 and October ~~8, 2016,~~6, 2018, the effective income tax rate was ~~39.4%~~129.0% and ~~36.7%~~20.6%, respectively. The ~~differences~~difference from the federal statutory rate ~~are primarily due to tax benefits related to state taxes, stock-based compensation and federal tax credits~~ in the current year ~~and~~was primarily due to state tax benefits resulting from losses in certain tax jurisdictions as well as tax credits. In the prior year, the difference from the federal statutory rate was primarily due to the lapse of the statute of limitations for an uncertain tax position, the Federal rate change effect on the finalization of deferred taxes for 2017 related to tax reform and ~~federal~~ tax credits, in the prior year. The Company adopted ASU 2016-09 on January 1, 2017, which requires tax benefits or deficiencies related to stock-based compensation to be reflected in the condensed consolidated statements of operations as a component of the provision forpartially offset by state income taxes whereas they were previously recognized in equity. Total tax benefits related to stock-based compensation recognized in fiscal 2017 were $1.3 million. As discussed in Note 4 – Goodwill, during the third quarter of fiscal 2017, the Company recorded a goodwill impairment loss of $189.0 million. This loss resulted in a reduction of deferred income tax liabilities (net) of $70.9 million..

The Company has a shareholder-approved stock incentive plan that provides for the granting of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, stock awards, and other stock-based and stock-related awards to directors, officers and other key associates.

Stock-based compensation expense recognized and included in “Selling, general and administrative expenses” in the condensed consolidated statements of operations, and related tax benefits were as follows:

	12 Weeks Ended						40 Weeks Ended
	October 7,			October 8,			October 7,			October 8,			12 Weeks Ended						40 Weeks Ended
(In thousands)	2017			2016			2017			2016			October 5, 2019			October 6, 2018			October 5, 2019			October 6, 2018
Restricted stock	$	1,103		$	944		$	8,593		$	7,010		$	637		$	773		$	6,735		$	7,040
Tax benefits		(439	)		(352	)		(3,149	)		(2,646	)		(163	)		(166	)		(1,148	)		(1,095	)
Stock-based compensation expense, net of tax	$	664		$	592		$	5,444		$	4,364		$	474		$	607		$	5,587		$	5,945

The following table summarizes activity in the stock-based compensation plans for the 40 weeks ended October ~~7, 2017:~~

									Weighted										Weighted
	Shares			Weighted		Restricted			Average		Shares			Weighted		Restricted			Average
	Under			Average		Stock			Grant-Date		Under			Average		Stock			Grant-Date
	Options			Exercise Price		Awards			Fair Value		Options			Exercise Price		Awards			Fair Value
Outstanding at December 31, 2016		200,517		$	19.94		660,143		$	26.48
Outstanding at December 29, 2018												13,052		$	13.87		822,819		$	23.07
Granted		—			—		296,297			34.68		—			—		482,059			17.91
Exercised/Vested		(152,589	)		21.02		(258,183	)		25.90		(13,052	)		13.87		(346,721	)		23.47
Cancelled/Forfeited		—			—		(82,739	)		29.09		—			—		(30,105	)		20.19
Outstanding at October 7, 2017		47,928		$	16.52		615,518		$	30.32
Outstanding at October 5, 2019												—		$	—		928,052		$	20.33

~~The Company has not issued any stock options since 2009 and all outstanding options are vested and exercisable at October 7, 2017.~~

As of October ~~7, 2017,~~5, 2019, total unrecognized compensation ~~costs~~cost related to non-vested ~~stock-based~~restricted stock awards granted under the Company’s stock incentive plans ~~were $5.1~~is $5.5 million ~~for restricted stock,~~ and ~~are~~is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of ~~2.2~~2.6 years. ~~All compensation costs related to stock options have been recognized.~~

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share from continuing operations:

	12 Weeks Ended						40 Weeks Ended
	October 7,			October 8,			October 7,			October 8,			12 Weeks Ended						40 Weeks Ended
(In thousands, except per share amounts)	2017			2016			2017			2016			October 5, 2019			October 6, 2018			October 5, 2019			October 6, 2018
Numerator:
(Loss) earnings from continuing operations	$	(123,452	)	$	16,730		$	(87,327	)	$	44,250		$	(310	)	$	17,545		$	444		$	47,818
Adjustment for loss (earnings) attributable to participating securities		2,064			(292	)		1,522			(785	)		8			(407	)		(11	)		(1,044	)
(Loss) earnings from continuing operations used in calculating earnings per share	$	(121,388	)	$	16,438		$	(85,805	)	$	43,465		$	(302	)	$	17,138		$	433		$	46,774
Denominator:
Weighted average shares outstanding, including participating securities		37,254			37,470			37,596			37,479			36,340			35,934			36,248			36,033
Adjustment for participating securities		(623	)		(654	)		(655	)		(665	)		(929	)		(833	)		(906	)		(787	)
Shares used in calculating basic earnings per share		36,631			36,816			36,941			36,814
Shares used in calculating basic (loss) earnings per share														35,411			35,101			35,342			35,246
Effect of dilutive stock options		—			76			—			60			—			12			—			12
Shares used in calculating diluted earnings per share		36,631			36,892			36,941			36,874
Shares used in calculating diluted (loss) earnings per share														35,411			35,113			35,342			35,258
Basic (loss) earnings per share from continuing operations	$	(3.31	)	$	0.45		$	(2.32	)	$	1.18		$	(0.01	)	$	0.49		$	0.01		$	1.33
Diluted (loss) earnings per share from continuing operations	$	(3.31	)	$	0.45		$	(2.32	)	$	1.18		$	(0.01	)	$	0.49		$	0.01		$	1.33

	40 Weeks Ended
	October 7,		October 8,		40 Weeks Ended
(In thousands)	2017		2016		October 5, 2019		October 6, 2018
Non-cash financing activities:
Capital lease obligations	$	405	$	3,490
Issuance of note payable as consideration for acquisition		2,460		—
Recognition of finance lease liabilities					$	900	$	2,410
Non-cash investing activities:
Capital expenditures included in accounts payable		1,711		1,429		4,746		4,350
Capital lease asset additions		405		3,490
Acquisition financed through issuance of note payable		2,460		—
Finance lease asset additions						900		2,410
Other supplemental cash flow information:
Cash paid for interest		18,379		12,830		28,401		22,768

The following tables set forth information about the Company by reporting segment:

(In thousands)	Food Distribution		Military			Retail			Total			Food Distribution			Military			Retail			Total
12 Weeks Ended October 7, 2017
12 Weeks Ended October 5, 2019
Net sales to external customers	$	937,397	$	505,631		$	463,616		$	1,906,644		$	939,047		$	499,156		$	561,605		$	1,999,808
Inter-segment sales		204,605		—			—			204,605			227,633			—			—			227,633
Merger/acquisition and integration		939		1,453			—			2,392
Restructuring charges and asset impairment		379		500			34,747			35,626			1,043			—			253			1,296
Depreciation and amortization		6,354		2,786			9,807			18,947			7,793			2,764			10,197			20,754
Operating earnings (loss)		20,350		1,118			(215,310	)		(193,842	)		11,699			(2,646	)		6,726			15,779
Capital expenditures		4,402		1,940			11,161			17,503			8,623			1,639			4,872			15,134

12 Weeks Ended October 8, 2016
12 Weeks Ended October 6, 2018
Net sales to external customers	$	804,500	$	506,626		$	488,959		$	1,800,085		$	940,183		$	500,222		$	446,325		$	1,886,730
Inter-segment sales		219,516		—			—			219,516			195,451			—			—			195,451
Merger/acquisition and integration		639		—			1,788			2,427			479			—			42			521
Restructuring charges and asset impairment		207		18			2,437			2,662
Restructuring (gains) charges and asset impairment													(68	)		29			271			232
Depreciation and amortization		4,842		2,693			10,392			17,927			7,540			2,816			8,891			19,247
Operating earnings		18,957		2,862			8,048			29,867			19,815			1,508			5,483			26,806
Capital expenditures		3,386		1,151			11,342			15,879			7,840			950			9,214			18,004

40 Weeks Ended October 7, 2017
40 Weeks Ended October 5, 2019
Net sales to external customers	$	3,041,983	$	1,620,021		$	1,541,853		$	6,203,857		$	3,043,668		$	1,661,097		$	1,833,347		$	6,538,112
Inter-segment sales		681,368		—			—			681,368			742,677			—			—			742,677
Merger/acquisition and integration		5,254		1,453			324			7,031			(130	)		—			1,494			1,364
Restructuring charges and asset impairment		1,280		500			34,853			36,633
Restructuring charges (gains) and asset impairment													10,724			—			(509	)		10,215
Depreciation and amortization		21,370		8,832			32,430			62,632			25,770			9,097			33,048			67,915
Operating earnings (loss)		68,868		4,517			(198,641	)		(125,256	)		36,564			(5,806	)		14,600			45,358
Capital expenditures		18,431		5,994			30,867			55,292			16,061			4,052			26,792			46,905

40 Weeks Ended October 8, 2016
40 Weeks Ended October 6, 2018
Net sales to external customers	$	2,615,964	$	1,686,567		$	1,603,885		$	5,906,416		$	3,037,096		$	1,653,496		$	1,477,164		$	6,167,756
Inter-segment sales		716,665		—			—			716,665			647,163			—			—			647,163
Merger/acquisition and integration		1,201		1			3,035			4,237			3,419			4			108			3,531
Restructuring charges and asset impairment		4,749		(241	)		19,206			23,714
Restructuring charges (gains) and asset impairment													1,292			(801	)		4,778			5,269
Depreciation and amortization		16,139		8,850			33,942			58,931			24,398			9,257			29,836			63,491
Operating earnings		64,040		8,792			11,315			84,147			63,060			6,120			13,192			82,372
Capital expenditures		13,581		4,198			39,436			57,215			26,250			2,479			23,871			52,600

					October 5,		December 29,
(In thousands)	October 7, 2017		December 31, 2016		2019		2018
Total Assets
Food Distribution	$	1,088,383	$	776,725	$	1,137,162	$	1,074,125
Military		449,845		395,737		424,983		405,587
Retail		492,079		754,625		769,311		489,049
Discontinued operations		3,467		3,249		3,090		3,151
Total	$	2,033,774	$	1,930,336	$	2,334,546	$	1,971,912

The Company offers a wide variety of grocery products, general merchandise and health and beauty care, pharmacy, fuel, and other items and services. The following table presents sales by type of similar products and services:

ITEM 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

This Management’s Discussion and Analysis of financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, the information contained under the caption “Forward-Looking Statements,” which appears at the beginning of this report, and the information in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December ~~31, 2016.~~29, 2018.

SpartanNash, headquartered in Grand Rapids, Michigan, is a leading multi-regional grocery distributor and grocery retailer whose core businesses include distributing grocery products to a diverse group of independent ~~grocery retailers (“independent retailers”), select national~~and chain retailers, its corporate owned retail stores, ~~and~~ military commissaries and exchanges in the United ~~States.~~States, as well as premier fresh produce distribution and fresh food processing. The Company operates three reportable business segments: Food Distribution, Military and Retail. The Company serves customers in all 50 states.

The Company’s Food Distribution segment provides a wide variety of nationally branded and private brand grocery products and perishable food products to ~~over 2,000~~approximately 2,100 independent ~~retailers, food distributors and~~grocer retail locations, the Company’s corporate owned retail ~~stores.~~stores, food service distributors, national retailers, and other customers. The Food Distribution segment ~~currently~~primarily conducts business in ~~47 states, primarily in~~ the Midwest ~~Great Lakes,~~ and Southeast regions of the United States. Through its Food Distribution segment, the Company also services select national retailers, including Dollar General. Sales to Dollar General are made to over 14,100 of its retail locations. Through its recent acquisition of Caito Foods Service (“Caito”) and Blue Ribbon Transport (“BRT”) (“the recent acquisition”) on January 7, 2017, theThe Company processes fresh-cut fruits and vegetables and other value-added meal solutions and supplies these products to grocery retailers and food service ~~distributors through~~distributors. The Company recently announced a plan to reposition its ~~Indiana and Florida facilities. With~~Fresh Production operations, which included the ~~new Caito~~sale of the Fresh Kitchen facility and related equipment. The Company is in the process of transitioning certain operations to other facilities and expects to cease production in the Fresh Kitchen during the fourth quarter of 2019. While the Company is ~~developing~~actively marketing the ~~ability~~sale of these assets, not all of the required criteria have been met to ~~process, cook and package fresh protein-based foods and complete meal solutions for a number~~present the assets as held-for-sale on the consolidated balance sheet as of ~~different customers. With the acquisition of BRT, the Company offers temperature-controlled logistics services throughout North America.~~October 5, 2019.

The Company’s Military segment contracts with manufacturers to distribute a wide variety of grocery products primarily to military commissaries and exchanges located in the United States, the District of Columbia, Europe, Cuba, Puerto Rico, Honduras, Bahrain, Djibouti and Egypt. The Company has over 40 years of experience acting as a distributor to U.S. military commissaries and exchanges. ~~As of December 8, 2016, the~~The Company is the exclusive worldwide supplier of private brand products to U.S. military commissaries and ~~began shipping~~is continuing to partner with DeCA in the rollout of private brand products to military commissaries which began during the second quarter of fiscal 2017.

At the end of the third quarter, the Company’s Retail segment operated ~~147~~158 corporate owned retail stores in the Midwest ~~and Great Lakes regions~~region primarily under the banners of Family Fare, ~~Supermarkets,~~Martin’s Super Markets, VG’s Food and Pharmacy, D&W Fresh Markets, Sun Mart and Family Fresh Market. The Company also offers pharmacy services in 8898 of its corporate owned retail stores and operates 3137 fuel centers. The retail stores have a “neighborhood market” focus to distinguish them from supercenters and limited assortment stores.

All fiscal quarters are 12 weeks, except for the Company’s first quarter, which is 16 weeks and will generally include the Easter holiday. The fourth quarter includes the Thanksgiving and Christmas holidays, and depending on the fiscal year end, may include the New Year’s holiday.

In certain geographic areas, the Company’s sales and operating performance may vary with seasonality. Many stores are dependent on tourism and therefore, are most affected by seasons and weather patterns, including, but not limited to, the amount and timing of snowfall during the winter months and the range of temperature during the summer months.

~~The Company’s~~During the quarter ended October 5, 2019, the Company made progress on its strategic objectives and better positioned itself for long-term growth and profitability. In addition to realizing sales growth, ~~trends accelerated in~~ the ~~third quarter of fiscal 2017 due~~Company remains focused on its other top objectives for the current year, including strengthening its management team, systems and supply chain operations, generating improvements through its Project One Team initiative, and reducing its debt, working capital and financial leverage ratios, which will all contribute to ~~contributions from the recent acquisition, continued~~improved growth in the Food Distribution segment from both new and existing customers, and the significant improvement in the Military segment’s sales trends, despite challenging retail market conditions. The Company continues to execute against key elements of its long-term strategic plan as is demonstrated by the continued sales growth in its distribution operations, and is committed to delivering increased value and convenience to its customers.operating earnings.

Third quarter ~~and year-to-date fiscal 2017~~2019 operational highlights include:

As the Company enters the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017, it remains committed to delivering long-term value to its shareholders and focusing on top-line and earnings growth. At the beginning of the third quarter, the Company entered into an agreement to obtain incremental distribution business from a DeCA provider exiting these operations in the Southwest United States. This new business, together with increasing contributions from the DeCA private brand program, are expected to grow Military’s sales in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017. Retail sales trends - while improving - are anticipated to remain negative forFor the remainder of 2019, the ~~year. The~~ Company ~~also~~ expects ~~continued organic~~Food Distribution to sustain low- to mid-single digit sales growth indriven by existing customers and new business. This expectation excludes the ~~Food Distribution segment.~~

~~The~~impact of the elimination of intercompany sales related to the acquisition of the Martin’s business. In the Military segment, the Company expects ~~a slight easing~~that new business within the segment, including continued private brand growth, will largely offset the negative DeCA comparable sales trend. Within the Retail segment, the Company expects total sales will increase due to the acquisition of ~~deflationary pressures with modest food inflation anticipated in~~Martin’s and the ~~fourth quarter, and therefore does not anticipate any~~significant current year implementation of the LIFO benefit realized in the prior year fourth quarter to recur. The Company also anticipates that projected fourth quarter sales growth at Food Distribution and the continuation of improved sales trends at Military will be more thanCompany’s brand positioning, partly offset by the ~~cycling~~impact of the prior year LIFO benefit, and that headwinds associated with hurricane impacts and the onboarding of new business will negatively affect fill rates and cause inbound freight disruptions in the fourth quarter. Retail earnings are anticipated to remain challenged for the remainder of the year as the competitive landscape and inflationary environment are expected to persist. Based on the factors noted above, the Company anticipates fourth quarter earnings will be significantly below the prior year.store rationalization plans.

The following table sets forth items from the condensed consolidated statements of operations as a percentage of net sales and the year-to-year percentage change in the dollar amounts:

Percentage of Net Sales

Percentage Change

12 Weeks

12 Weeks Ended

40 Weeks Ended

Ended

October 7,

October 8,

October 7,

October 8,

October 7,

2017

2016

2017

2016

2017

Net sales

100.0

%

100.0

%

100.0

%

100.0

%

5.9

Gross profit

13.7

14.2

14.3

14.4

2.5

Selling, general and administrative expenses

12.0

12.3

*

12.6

12.5

3.7

Merger/acquisition and integration

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

(1.4
)
Restructuring charges and goodwill/asset impairment

11.8

0.1

3.6

0.4

8,339.3

Operating (loss) earnings

(10.2
)

1.7

(2.0
)

1.4

(749.0
)
Other income and expenses

0.3

0.3

*

0.3

0.2

41.7

(Loss) earnings before income taxes and discontinued operations

(10.5
)

1.4

(2.3
)

1.2

(881.0
)
Income taxes

(4.0
)
*

0.5

(0.9
)

0.5

*

(962.4
)
(Loss) earnings from continuing operations

(6.5
)

0.9

(1.4
)

0.7

(837.9
)
Loss from discontinued operations, net of taxes

—

—

—

—

(34.1
)
Net (loss) earnings

(6.5
)
%

0.9

%

(1.4
)
%

0.7

%

(841.9
)

Operating earnings	0.8		1.4		0.7		1.3			(41.1	)		(44.9	)
Other expenses and income	0.9		0.4		0.7		0.4			157.7			111.5
(Loss) earnings before income taxes and discontinued operations	(0.1	)	1.1		(0.0	)	1.0			(109.9	)		(102.5	)
Income tax (benefit) expense	(0.1	)	0.1		(0.0	)	0.2			(169.8	)		(115.9	)
(Loss) earnings from continuing operations	(0.0	)	0.9		0.0		0.8			(101.8	)		(99.1	)
Loss from discontinued operations, net of taxes	(0.0	)	(0.0	)	(0.0	)	(0.0	)	**			**
Net (loss) earnings	(0.0	)	0.9		0.0		0.8			(101.9	)		(99.3	)

Net Sales – The following table presents net sales by segment and variances in net sales:

	12 Weeks Ended							40 Weeks Ended
	October 7,		October 8,					October 7,		October 8,					12 Weeks Ended							40 Weeks Ended
(In thousands)	2017		2016		Variance			2017		2016		Variance			October 5, 2019		October 6, 2018		Variance			October 5, 2019		October 6, 2018		Variance
Food Distribution	$	937,397	$	804,500	$	132,897		$	3,041,983	$	2,615,964	$	426,019		$	939,047	$	940,183	$	(1,136	)	$	3,043,668	$	3,037,096	$	6,572
Military		505,631		506,626		(995	)		1,620,021		1,686,567		(66,546	)		499,156		500,222		(1,066	)		1,661,097		1,653,496		7,601
Retail		463,616		488,959		(25,343	)		1,541,853		1,603,885		(62,032	)		561,605		446,325		115,280			1,833,347		1,477,164		356,183
Total net sales	$	1,906,644	$	1,800,085	$	106,559		$	6,203,857	$	5,906,416	$	297,441		$	1,999,808	$	1,886,730	$	113,078		$	6,538,112	$	6,167,756	$	370,356

Net sales for the quarter ended October ~~7, 2017~~5, 2019 (“third quarter”) increased ~~$106.6~~$113.1 million, or ~~5.9%~~6.0%, to ~~$1.91~~$2.00 billion from ~~$1.80~~$1.89 billion in the quarter ended October ~~8, 2016~~6, 2018 (“prior year quarter”). Net sales for the year-to-date period ended October ~~7, 2017~~5, 2019 (“year-to-date period”) increased ~~$297.4~~$370.4 million, or ~~5.0%~~6.0%, to ~~$6.20~~$6.54 billion from ~~$5.91~~$6.17 billion in the year-to-date period ended October ~~8, 2016~~6, 2018 (“prior year-to-date period”). The ~~increase was~~increases were driven primarily by ~~contributions~~incremental sales from the Caito acquisition and organic growth from existing customers in the Food Distribution segment, which more than offset lower sales in the Retail segment. Third quarter net sales trends increased sequentially from the second quarter due to significantly improved sales comparisons in the Military commissary business.Martin’s acquisition.

Food Distribution net sales ~~after intercompany eliminations, increased $132.9~~decreased $1.1 million, or ~~16.5%~~0.1%, to ~~$937.4~~$939.0 million in the third quarter from ~~$804.5~~$940.2 million in the prior year quarter. Net sales for the year-to-date period increased ~~$426.0~~$6.6 million, or ~~16.3%~~0.2%, ~~from $2.62~~and amount to $3.04 billion in both the current and prior year-to-date ~~period~~periods. Before the impact of the elimination of sales to ~~$3.04 billion. The~~Martin’s, following the acquisition at the beginning of 2019, sales grew 3.6% and 4.0% in the third quarter and year-to-date ~~increases were~~period, respectively, primarily due to ~~contributions from the Caito acquisition and organic volume~~sales growth ~~from~~with existing customers.

Military net sales decreased ~~$1.0~~$1.1 million, or 0.2%, to ~~$505.6~~$499.2 million in the third quarter from $506.6 million in the prior year quarter, representing a significant improvement from the 6.8% decline in the second quarter. Net sales for the year-to-date period decreased $66.5 million, or 3.9%, from $1.69 billion in the prior year-to-date period to $1.62 billion. The third quarter and year-to-date decreases were primarily due to lower sales at the DeCA operated commissaries, which for the third quarter were mostly offset by new business.

~~Retail net sales decreased $25.4 million, or 5.2%, to $463.6 million in the third quarter from $489.0~~$500.2 million in the prior year quarter. Net sales for the year-to-date period ~~decreased $62.0~~increased $7.6 million, or ~~3.9%~~0.5%, from ~~$1.60~~$1.65 billion in the prior year-to-date period to ~~$1.54~~$1.66 billion. The decrease from the prior year quarter was due to lower comparable sales at DeCA operated locations, mostly offset by new business. The increase from the prior year-to-date period was primarily due to incremental volume from new business with an existing customer that commenced late in the fourth quarter of 2018 and growth in DeCA’s private brand program, partially offset by lower comparable sales at DeCA operated locations.

Retail net sales increased $115.3 million, or 25.8%, to $561.6 million in the third quarter from $446.3 million in the prior year quarter. Net sales for the year-to-date period increased $356.2 million, or 24.1%, from $1.48 billion in the prior year-to-date period to $1.83 billion. The increase in net sales was primarily attributable to ~~lower~~incremental sales ~~resulting~~ from the ~~closures and~~Martin’s acquisition. Comparable store sales ~~of retail stores ($16.7 million~~increased 0.1% for the quarter and ~~$42.8 million year-to-date) and negative comparable store sales. Comparable store sales, excluding fuel, were down 2.5% for the quarter and 2.2%~~decreased 0.7% percent for the year-to-date period ~~and reflect continued strong competition within the industry.~~. The Company defines a retail store as comparable when it is in operation for 14 accounting periods (a period equals four weeks), regardless of remodels, expansions or relocated stores. ~~Please note that the~~The Company’s definition of comparable store sales may differ from similarly titled measures at other companies.

Gross Profit – Gross profit represents net sales less cost of sales, which for all non-production operations includes ~~product~~ purchase costs, in-bound freight, physical inventory adjustments, markdowns and promotional allowances and excludes warehousing costs, depreciation and other administrative expenses. For the Company’s food processing operations, cost of sales includes direct product and production costs, inbound freight, purchasing and receiving costs, utilities, depreciation, and other indirect production costs and excludes out-bound freight and other administrative expenses. The Company’s gross profit definition may not be identical to similarly titled measures reported by other companies. Vendor allowances that relate to the buying and merchandising activities consist primarily of promotional allowances, which are generally allowances on purchased quantities and, to a lesser extent, slotting allowances, which are billed to vendors for the Company’s merchandising costs, such as setting up warehouse infrastructure. Vendor allowances ~~associated with product cost~~ are recognized as a reduction in cost of sales when the product is sold. Lump sum payments received for multi-year contracts are amortized over the life of the contracts based on contractual terms. The distribution segments include shipping and handling costs in the Selling, general and administrative section of operating expenses in the consolidated statements of operations.

Gross profit increased $34.2 million, or 13.4%, to ~~$261.7~~$290.4 million in the third quarter from ~~$255.3~~$256.1 million in the prior year quarter. As a percent of net sales, gross profit was ~~13.7%~~14.5% compared to ~~14.2%~~13.6% in the prior year quarter. Gross profit for the year-to-date period increased ~~$37.9~~$92.1 million, or ~~4.4%~~10.6%, from ~~$852.2~~$865.0 million in the prior year-to-date period to ~~$890.1 million.~~$957.1 million in the current year. As a percent of net sales, gross profit for the year-to-date period was ~~14.3%~~14.6% compared to ~~14.4%~~14.0% in the prior year-to-date period. As a percent of net sales, the third quarter and year-to-date ~~changes~~period change in gross margin ~~were~~was primarily due to the ~~increased~~acquisition of Martin’sand the resulting higher mix of ~~Food Distribution sales as a percentage of total sales combined with margin investments in the~~ Retail ~~segment.~~sales.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses – Selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) expenses consist primarily of salaries and wages, employee benefits, ~~warehousing costs, store occupancy~~facility costs, shipping and handling, ~~utilities,~~ equipment rental, depreciation (to the extent not included in Cost of sales), out-bound freight and other administrative expenses.

SG&A expenses increased ~~$8.2 million, or 3.7%,~~ to ~~$228.5~~$273.3 million in the third quarter from ~~$220.3~~$228.6 million in the prior year quarter, representing ~~12.0%~~13.7% of net sales in the third quarter compared to ~~12.3%~~12.1% in the prior year quarter. SG&A expenses for the year-to-date period increased ~~$42.6~~$126.3 million, or ~~5.7%~~16.3%, from ~~$740.1~~$773.8 million in the prior year-to-date period to ~~$782.7~~$900.2 million, and increased ~~to 12.6%~~from 12.5% as a percentage of net sales ~~compared to 12.5%~~ in the prior year-to-date ~~period.~~period compared to 13.8%. The ~~third~~increase in expenses as a rate of sales compared to the prior year quarter and year-to-date ~~increases in expense were primarily due to the addition of the Caito acquisition, partly offset by lower incentive compensation expenses. The rate to sales decrease in the third quarter~~period was primarily due to an increase in the mix of ~~business~~Retail segment operations with the acquisition of Martin’s, higher corporate administrative expenses, including expenses associated with the CEO transition and ~~lower~~a non-recurring, supplemental, transition incentive ~~compensation expenses.~~program for eligible associates (“Transition Costs”), and higher supply chain costs in both the Military and Food Distribution segments.

Merger/Acquisition and Integration – Third quarter results did not include any merger/acquisition and integration expenses, while prior year quarter results included $0.5 million. The year-to-date period and the prior year-to-date period results included ~~$2.4~~$1.4 million and ~~$7.0~~$3.5 million ~~respectively,~~ of merger/acquisition and integration expenses, respectively. The expenses are mainly associated with ~~recent acquisitions. Prior year quarter and year-to-date results included $2.4 million and $4.2 million, respectively, of merger/~~the acquisition and integration ~~primarily associated with~~of Martin’s in the ~~merger~~current year and the integration of Spartan Stores, Inc. and the Nash-Finch ~~Company.~~Company in the prior year.

Restructuring Charges and ~~Goodwill and~~ Asset Impairment – Third quarter and~~year-to-date~~ prior year quarter results included ~~$224.7~~net charges of $1.3 million and $225.7 million, respectively, of net restructuring and asset impairment charges predominantly associated with third quarter goodwill and asset impairment charges. In the third quarter, the Company recorded a non-cash goodwill impairment charge of $189.0 million related to the Retail segment. As a result of significantly lower than expected Retail operating results due to an increasingly competitive retail environment and the related pricing pressures that are anticipated to negatively impact gross margin, operating profit, and future cash flows, the Company revised its future projections for the Retail reporting unit. The Company performed Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test by calculating the fair value of the Retail reporting unit based on its discounted estimated future cash flows. It was determined that the carrying value of the Retail segment exceeded its fair value, and consequently, the Company recorded an estimated goodwill impairment charge of $189.0 million. The Company also recorded $35.6 million of asset impairment and restructuring charges in the third quarter primarily associated with the underlying performance of Company’s retail store base and the execution of its store rationalization program. Prior year quarter and year-to-date results included $2.7 million and $23.7$0.2 million, respectively, of restructuring and asset impairment ~~charges. Prior year quarter~~activity. The year-to-date period and the prior year-to-date period results included net charges of $10.2 million and $5.3 million, respectively, of restructuring ~~charges~~ and asset impairment ~~consisted~~activity. The current year third quarter activity consists primarily of asset impairment charges ~~related~~ to ~~three underperforming retail stores and additional costs, incurred in connection with winding down operations at certain closed facilities in the Food Distribution and Retail segments. Prior~~adjust non-operating real estate to its fair value, which is classified as held-for-sale. The year-to-date period ~~restructuring charges and~~includes asset impairment ~~consisted primarily~~charges associated with the decision to reposition Fresh Production operations, which are partially offset by gains on the sale of a previously closed distribution center. The prior year-to-date amount includes charges ~~related to the closure of three retail stores and two food distribution centers which were part of~~associated with the Company’s retail store rationalization plans, partially offset by gains on sales of real estate.

The Company performs goodwill impairment tests on an annual basis, or whenever events or circumstances indicate that it would be more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is below its carrying amount. On a quarterly basis, the Company assesses whether there are any indicators that the carrying value of the Food Distribution reporting unit, the only reporting unit which carries a goodwill balance, is in excess of its fair value. One of the considerations performed by the Company is whether the carrying value of the enterprise as a whole is greater than the market capitalization, considering a reasonable control premium. At the end of the first quarter and ~~warehouse rationalization plan,~~into the second quarter of 2019 the decline in the Company’s stock price substantially decreased market capitalization, and the decline became sustained during the second quarter. As a result of this indicator of impairment, the Company performed an interim goodwill impairment test for the Food Distribution reporting unit during the second quarter.

The Company estimates the fair value of the Food Distribution reporting unit primarily based on the income approach using a discounted cash flow model and also incorporates the market approach using observable comparable company information. In addition, the Company reconciles the fair value estimate for the Food Distribution reporting unit to the current market capitalization of the enterprise as ~~well as~~a whole. While the Retail and Military reporting units do not carry goodwill balances, their fair values are combined with the fair value estimate of the Food Distribution reporting unit in determining the enterprise value of the total Company.

As a result of the second quarter impairment ~~charges related to three underperforming retail stores.~~test, the Company concluded that the fair value of the Food Distribution reporting unit was substantially in excess of its carrying value and that the reconciliation between the enterprise value of the Company and market capitalization, was within the Company’s expectations based on recent market transactions. The Company will perform its annual assessment of goodwill during the fourth quarter of 2019.

Operating Earnings (Loss) – The following table presents operating earnings (loss) ~~earnings~~ by segment and variances in operating ~~earnings:~~

	12 Weeks Ended								40 Weeks Ended
	October 7,			October 8,					October 7,			October 8,					12 Weeks Ended								40 Weeks Ended
(In thousands)	2017			2016		Variance			2017			2016		Variance			October 5, 2019			October 6, 2018		Variance			October 5, 2019			October 6, 2018		Variance
Food Distribution	$	20,350		$	18,957	$	1,393		$	68,868		$	64,040	$	4,828		$	11,699		$	19,815	$	(8,116	)	$	36,564		$	63,060	$	(26,496	)
Military		1,118			2,862		(1,744	)		4,517			8,792		(4,275	)		(2,646	)		1,508		(4,154	)		(5,806	)		6,120		(11,926	)
Retail		(215,310	)		8,048		(223,358	)		(198,641	)		11,315		(209,956	)		6,726			5,483		1,243			14,600			13,192		1,408
Total operating (loss) earnings	$	(193,842	)	$	29,867	$	(223,709	)	$	(125,256	)	$	84,147	$	(209,403	)
Total operating earnings																	$	15,779		$	26,806	$	(11,027	)	$	45,358		$	82,372	$	(37,014	)

Operating earnings decreased ~~$223.7~~$11.0 million, or 41.1% to ~~a loss of $193.8~~$15.8 million in the third quarter from ~~earnings of $29.9~~$26.8 million in the prior year quarter. Operating earnings for the year-to-date period decreased ~~$209.4~~$37.0 million, or 44.9%, to ~~a loss of $125.3~~$45.4 million from ~~earnings of $84.1~~$82.4 million in the prior year-to-date period. The third quarter decrease was primarily ~~due~~attributable to higher corporate administrative expenses, including Transition Costs, and higher supply chain costs. These items were partially offset by incremental earnings from the ~~goodwill impairment, higher asset impairment charges, start-up costs associated with the new Fresh Kitchen operation~~newly acquired Martin’s business and ~~the negative impact of lower sales~~growth in the ~~Retail segment, which more than offset lower incentive compensation costs and organic sales growth in~~ Food ~~Distribution.~~Distribution segment. The year-to-date decrease was ~~primarily~~ due to the ~~goodwill impairment, higher asset impairment and restructuring charges predominantly related to the Retail segment~~same items as well as ~~higher merger/acquisition~~second quarter asset impairment charges and ~~integration~~one-time expenses ~~and start-up costs~~ associated with the ~~recent acquisition, which more than offset the positive impacts of lower incentive compensation and organic sales growth in Food Distribution.~~Project One Team initiative.

Food Distribution operating earnings ~~increased $1.4~~decreased $8.1 million, or ~~7.3%~~41.0%, to ~~$20.3~~$11.7 million in the third quarter from ~~$19.0~~$19.8 million in the prior year quarter. Operating earnings for the year-to-date period decreased $26.5 million, or 42.0%, to $36.6 million from $63.1 million in the prior year-to-date period. The decrease in operating earnings in the third quarter was due to due to higher corporate administrative expenses, including Transition Costs, as well as supply chain costs, partially offset bycontributions from sales growth. The year-to-date period was also impacted by the second quarter asset impairment charges.

Military operating earnings decreased $4.2 million to a $2.6 million operating loss in the third quarter from $1.5 million in operating earnings in the prior year quarter. Operating earnings for the year-to-date period decreased $11.9 million to a $5.8 million operating loss from $6.1 million in operating earnings in the prior year-to-date period. The third quarter and year-to-date decreases were primarily attributable to higher supply chain costs and corporate administrative expenses. The year-to-date period decrease was also attributable to one-time costs associated with Project One Team, organizational realignment costs, as well as the cycling of gains related to the sale of a closed facility in the second quarter of the prior year.

Retail operating earnings increased $1.2 million, or 22.7% to $6.7 million in the third quarter from $5.5 million in the prior year quarter. Operating earnings for the year-to-date period increased ~~$4.8~~$1.4 million, or ~~7.5%~~10.7%, to ~~$68.9~~$14.6 million from ~~$64.0~~$13.2 million in the prior year-to-date period. The ~~increase for~~increases in operating earnings was primarily attributable to the ~~quarter was driven by organic sales growth~~contribution of the acquired Martin’s stores, improvement in margin rates and ~~lower incentive compensation,~~the favorable impact of closing underperforming stores, partially offset by ~~Fresh Kitchen start-up costs.~~higher corporate administrative expenses, including Transition Costs. The year-to-date increase ~~for the year-to-date period~~in operating earnings was ~~driven by organic sales growth and lower incentive compensation, and lower restructuring charges related to the Company’s warehouse optimization plan, partially~~also offset by ~~charges related to Fresh Kitchen start-up~~the allocation of one-time costs ~~and merger/acquisition and integration expenses.~~associated with Project One Team.

~~Military operating earnings decreased $1.7~~Interest Expense – Interest expense increased $0.3 million, or ~~60.9%~~4.2%, to ~~$1.1~~$7.4 million in the third quarter from ~~$2.9~~$7.1 million in the prior year quarter. Operating earnings for the year-to-date period decreased $4.3 million, or 48.6%, to $4.5 million from $8.8 million in the prior year-to-date period. The third quarter decrease was due to higher merger/acquisition and integration and impairment expenses partly offset by margin rate improvements and lower incentive compensation expenses. The year-to-date decrease in operating earnings was primarily due to higher merger/acquisition and integration expenses, the negative impact of the shift of New Year’s Day into the first quarter, and higher costs for health care and a large insurance claim.

Retail operating earnings decreased $223.4 million to a loss of $215.3 million in the third quarter from earnings of $8.0 million in the prior year quarter. Operating earnings for the year-to-date period decreased $210.0 million to a loss of $198.6 million from earnings of $11.3 million in the prior year-to-date period. The third quarter decrease was primarily due to the goodwill impairment, higher asset impairment charges, lower sales, and investments in margin, partly offset by lower merger/acquisition and integration expenses. The year-to-date decrease was primarily due to higher asset impairment charges, higher health care costs, lower comparable store sales and the shift of New Year’s Day, partially offset by lower merger/acquisition and integration expenses and the closure of unprofitable stores.

~~Interest Expense~~ ~~– Interest expense increased $1.7 million, or 38.7%, to $6.1 million in the third quarter from $4.4 million in the prior year quarter.~~ Interest expense for the year-to-date period increased ~~$4.4~~$5.1 million, or ~~30.3%,~~22.4% from ~~$14.7~~$22.8 million in the prior year-to-date period to ~~$19.1~~$28.0 million. The increase in interest expense for the year-to-date period was primarily due to ~~increased borrowings related~~an increase in interest rates compared to the ~~Caito~~prior year and ~~BRT~~incremental borrowings to fund the Martin’s acquisition. Interest rates have become more comparable to the prior year in the third quarter as a result of an early paydown of the term loan (Tranche A-2) with available borrowings from the revolving credit facility. The Company has also paid down the incremental borrowings associated with the Martin’s acquisition.

Income Taxes – The effective income tax ~~rates were 38.2%~~rate was 84.2% and ~~34.6%~~11.9% for the third quarter and prior year quarter, respectively. For the year-to-date period and prior year-to-date period, the effective income tax rates were ~~39.4%~~129.0% and ~~36.7%~~20.6%, respectively. The ~~differences~~difference from the federal statutory rate ~~are~~in the current year was primarily due to state ~~taxes,~~ tax benefits ~~related to stock-based compensation and federal~~resulting from losses in certain tax ~~credits in the current year and state taxes and federal~~jurisdictions as well as tax ~~credits in~~credits. In the prior ~~year. The Company’s effective tax~~year, the difference from the federal statutory rate was ~~impacted by the stock-based compensation benefits recognized resulting from the adoption of ASU 2016-09. The tax impacts of stock-based compensation are~~ primarily ~~generated in the first quarter~~ due to the ~~timing~~lapse of ~~awards~~the statute of limitations for an uncertain tax position, the Federal rate change effect on the finalization of deferred taxes for 2017 and ~~vesting schedules.~~tax credits, partially offset by state income taxes.

In addition to reporting financial results in accordance with GAAP, the Company also provides information regarding adjusted operating earnings, adjusted earnings from continuing operations, and Adjusted Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization (“adjusted EBITDA”). These are non-GAAP financial measures, as defined below, and are used by management to allocate resources, assess performance against its peers and evaluate overall performance. The Company believes these measures provide useful information for both management and its investors. The Company believes these non-GAAP measures are useful to investors because they provide additional understanding of the trends and special circumstances that affect its business. These measures provide useful supplemental information that helps investors to establish a basis for expected performance and the ability to evaluate actual results against that expectation. The measures, when considered in connection with GAAP results, can be used to assess the overall performance of the Company as well as assess the Company’s performance against its peers. These measures are also used as a basis for certain compensation programs sponsored by the Company. In addition, securities analysts, fund managers and other shareholders and stakeholders that communicate with the Company request its financial results in these adjusted formats.

Current year adjusted operating earnings, adjusted earnings from continuing operations, and adjusted EBITDA exclude “Fresh Kitchen operating losses” subsequent to the decision to exit these operations at the beginning of the third quarter, costs associated with organizational realignment, which include significant changes to the Company’s management team, and fees paid to a third-party advisory firm associated with Project One Team, the Company’s initiative to drive growth while increasing efficiency and reducing costs. Pension termination costs, primarily related to non-operating settlement expense associated with the distribution of pension assets, are excluded from adjusted earnings from continuing operations, and to a lesser extent adjusted operating earnings. These items are considered “non-operational” or “non-core” in nature. Prior year adjusted operating earnings, adjusted earnings from continuing operations, and adjusted EBITDA exclude start-up costs associated with the ~~new~~ Fresh Kitchen operation, ~~as well as an executive retirement stock compensation award.~~which concluded during the first quarter of 2018. The Fresh Kitchen ~~is a newly constructed facility that provides the Company with the ability to process, cook, and package fresh protein-based foods and complete meal solutions. Given the Fresh Kitchen represents~~represented a new line of business for the Company, the start-up activities associated with testing, training, and preparing the Fresh Kitchen for production, as well as incorporating the related operations into the business, are considered “non-operational” or “non-core” in nature. The retirement stock compensation award represents incremental compensation expense in connection with an executive retirement that is also considered “non-operational” or “non-core” in nature.Company.

Adjusted operating earnings is a non-GAAP operating financial measure that the Company defines as operating earnings plus or minus adjustments for items that do not reflect the ongoing operating activities of the Company and costs associated with the closing of operational locations.

The Company believes that adjusted operating earnings provide a meaningful representation of its operating performance for the Company as a whole and for its operating segments. The Company considers adjusted operating earnings as an additional way to measure operating performance on an ongoing basis. Adjusted operating earnings is meant to reflect the ongoing operating performance of all of its distribution and retail operations; consequently, it excludes the impact of items that could be considered “non-operating” or “non-core” in nature and also excludes the contributions of activities classified as discontinued operations. Because adjusted operating earnings and adjusted operating earnings by segment are performance measures that management uses to allocate resources, assess performance against its peers and evaluate overall performance, the Company believes it provides useful information for both management and its investors. In addition, securities analysts, fund managers and other shareholders and stakeholders that communicate with the Company request its operating financial results in adjusted operating earnings format.

Adjusted operating earnings is not a measure of performance under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”), and should not be considered as a substitute for operating earnings, cash flows from operating activities and other income or cash flow statement data. The Company’s definition of adjusted operating earnings may not be identical to similarly titled measures reported by other companies.

Following is a reconciliation of operating earnings (loss) ~~earnings~~ to adjusted operating earnings for the 12 ~~weeks~~ and 40 weeks ended October ~~7, 2017~~5, 2019 and October ~~8, 2016.~~

	12 Weeks Ended					40 Weeks Ended
	October 7,			October 8,		October 7,			October 8,			12 Weeks Ended						40 Weeks Ended
(In thousands)	2017			2016		2017			2016			October 5, 2019			October 6, 2018			October 5, 2019			October 6, 2018
Operating (loss) earnings	$	(193,842	)	$	29,867	$	(125,256	)	$	84,147
Adjustments:
Merger/acquisition and integration		2,392			2,427		7,031			4,237
Restructuring charges and asset impairment		224,653			2,662		225,660			23,714
Fresh Kitchen start-up costs		2,086			—		6,688			—
Stock compensation associated with executive retirement		—			—		1,172
Severance associated with cost reduction initiatives		4			149		27			839
Adjusted operating earnings	$	35,293		$	35,105	$	115,322		$	112,937
Reconciliation of operating earnings (loss) to adjusted operating earnings by segment:
Food Distribution:
Operating earnings	$	20,350		$	18,957	$	68,868		$	64,040		$	15,779		$	26,806		$	45,358		$	82,372
Adjustments:
Merger/acquisition and integration		939			639		5,254			1,201			—			521			1,364			3,531
Restructuring charges and asset impairment		379			207		1,280			4,749			1,296			232			10,215			5,269
Fresh Kitchen start-up costs		2,086			—		6,688			—			—			—			—			1,366
Stock compensation associated with executive retirement		—			—		591			—
Fresh Kitchen operating losses													2,204			—			2,204			—
Expenses associated with tax planning strategies													—			225			—			225
Costs associated with Project One Team													—			—			5,428			—
Organizational realignment costs													935			—			1,812			—
Pension termination													28			—			48			—
Severance associated with cost reduction initiatives													43			50			484			668
Adjusted operating earnings												$	20,285		$	27,834		$	66,913		$	93,431
Reconciliation of operating earnings (loss) to adjusted operating earnings (loss) by segment:												Reconciliation of operating earnings (loss) to adjusted operating earnings (loss) by segment:
Food Distribution:
Operating earnings												$	11,699		$	19,815		$	36,564		$	63,060
Adjustments:
Merger/acquisition and integration													—			479			(130	)		3,419
Restructuring charges (gains) and asset impairment													1,043			(68	)		10,724			1,292
Fresh Kitchen start-up costs													—			—			—			1,366
Fresh Kitchen operating losses													2,204			—			2,204			—
Expenses associated with tax planning strategies													—			116			—			116
Costs associated with Project One Team													—			—			2,877			—
Organizational realignment costs													495			—			960			—
Pension termination													15			—			26			—
Severance associated with cost reduction initiatives		4			12		25			218			31			66			392			517
Adjusted operating earnings	$	23,758		$	19,815	$	82,706		$	70,208		$	15,487		$	20,408		$	53,617		$	69,770
Military:
Operating (loss) earnings												$	(2,646	)	$	1,508		$	(5,806	)	$	6,120
Adjustments:
Merger/acquisition and integration													—			—			—			4
Restructuring charges (gains)													—			29			—			(801	)
Expenses associated with tax planning strategies													—			28			—			28
Costs associated with Project One Team													—			—			706			—
Organizational realignment costs													122			—			236			—
Pension termination													3			—			5			—
Severance associated with cost reduction initiatives													—			(1	)		9			69
Adjusted operating (loss) earnings												$	(2,521	)	$	1,564		$	(4,850	)	$	5,420
Retail:
Operating earnings	$	1,118		$	2,862	$	4,517		$	8,792		$	6,726		$	5,483		$	14,600		$	13,192
Adjustments:
Merger/acquisition and integration		1,453			—		1,453			1			—			42			1,494			108
Restructuring charges (gains)		500			18		500			(241	)
Stock compensation associated with executive retirement		—			—		147			—
Restructuring charges (gains) and asset impairment													253			271			(509	)		4,778
Expenses associated with tax planning strategies													—			81			—			81
Costs associated with Project One Team													—			—			1,845			—
Organizational realignment costs													318			—			616			—
Pension termination													10			—			17			—
Severance associated with cost reduction initiatives		—			20		1			242			12			(15	)		83			82
Adjusted operating earnings	$	3,071		$	2,900	$	6,618		$	8,794		$	7,319		$	5,862		$	18,146		$	18,241
Retail:
Operating (loss) earnings	$	(215,310	)	$	8,048	$	(198,641	)	$	11,315
Adjustments:
Merger/acquisition and integration		—			1,788		324			3,035
Restructuring charges and asset impairment		223,774			2,437		223,880			19,206
Stock compensation associated with executive retirement		—			—		434			—
Severance associated with cost reduction initiatives		—			117		1			379
Adjusted operating earnings	$	8,464		$	12,390	$	25,998		$	33,935

Adjusted earnings from continuing operations is a non-GAAP operating financial measure that the Company defines as earnings from continuing operations plus or minus adjustments for items that do not reflect the ongoing operating activities of the Company and costs associated with the closing of operational locations.

The Company believes that adjusted earnings from continuing operations provide a meaningful representation of its operating performance for the Company. The Company considers adjusted earnings from continuing operations as an additional way to measure operating performance on an ongoing basis. Adjusted earnings from continuing operations is meant to reflect the ongoing operating performance of all of its distribution and retail operations; consequently, it excludes the impact of items that could be considered “non-operating” or “non-core” in nature, and ~~also~~ excludes the contributions of activities classified as discontinued operations. Because adjusted earnings from continuing operations is a performance measure that management uses to allocate resources, assess performance against its peers and evaluate overall performance, the Company believes it provides useful information for both management and its investors. In addition, securities analysts, fund managers and other shareholders and stakeholders that communicate with the Company request its operating financial results in adjusted earnings from continuing operations format.

Adjusted earnings from continuing operations is not a measure of performance under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and should not be considered as a substitute for net earnings, cash flows from operating activities and other income or cash flow statement data. The Company’s definition of adjusted earnings from continuing operations may not be identical to similarly titled measures reported by other companies.

Following is a reconciliation of ~~(loss)~~ earnings from continuing operations to adjusted earnings from continuing operations for the 12 ~~weeks~~ and 40 weeks ended October ~~7, 2017~~5, 2019 and October ~~8, 2016.~~

	12 Weeks Ended											12 Weeks Ended
	October 7, 2017						October 8, 2016					October 5, 2019						October 6, 2018
				per diluted						per diluted					per diluted						per diluted
(In thousands, except per share amounts)	Earnings			share			Earnings			share		Earnings			share			Earnings			share
(Loss) earnings from continuing operations	$	(123,452	)	$	(3.31	)	$	16,730		$	0.45	$	(310	)	$	(0.01	)	$	17,545		$	0.49
Adjustments:
Merger/acquisition and integration		2,392						2,427					—						521
Restructuring charges and asset impairment		224,653						2,662					1,296						232
Fresh Kitchen start-up costs		2,086						—
Fresh Kitchen operating losses													2,204						—
Expenses associated with tax planning strategies													—						225
Organizational realignment costs													935						—
Loss on debt extinguishment													329						—
Severance associated with cost reduction initiatives		4						149					43						50
Pension termination													10,159						—
Total adjustments		229,135						5,238					14,966						1,028
Income tax effect on adjustments (a)		(85,546	)					(1,918	)				(3,751	)					(176	)
Impact of Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (b)													—						(494	)
Total adjustments, net of taxes		143,589			3.85			3,320			0.08		11,215			0.31			358			0.01
Adjusted earnings from continuing operations	$	20,137		$	0.54		$	20,050		$	0.53	$	10,905		$	0.30		$	17,903		$	0.50

												40 Weeks Ended
												October 5, 2019						October 6, 2018
	40 Weeks Ended														per diluted						per diluted
	October 7, 2017						October 8, 2016
				per diluted						per diluted
(In thousands, except per share amounts)	Earnings			share			Earnings			share		Earnings			share			Earnings			share
(Loss) earnings from continuing operations	$	(87,327	)	$	(2.32	)	$	44,250		$	1.18
Earnings from continuing operations												$	444		$	0.01		$	47,818		$	1.33
Adjustments:
Merger integration and acquisition expenses		7,031						4,237
Merger/acquisition and integration													1,364						3,531
Restructuring charges and asset impairment		225,660						23,714					10,215						5,269
Fresh Kitchen start-up costs		6,688						—					—						1,366
Fresh Kitchen operating losses													2,204						—
Expenses associated with tax planning strategies													—						225
Costs associated with Project One Team													5,428						—
Organizational realignment costs													1,812						—
Loss on debt extinguishment													329						—
Severance associated with cost reduction initiatives		27						839					484						668
Stock compensation associated with executive retirement		1,172						—
Pension termination													19,510						—
Total adjustments		240,578						28,790					41,346						11,059
Income tax effect on adjustments (a)		(89,840	)					(10,871	)				(10,166	)					(2,564	)
Impact of Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (b)													—						(494	)
Total adjustments, net of taxes		150,738			4.01			17,919			0.48		31,180			0.86			8,001			0.22
Adjusted earnings from continuing operations	$	63,411		$	1.69		$	62,169		$	1.66	$	31,624		$	0.87		$	55,819		$	1.55
* Includes rounding

Adjusted Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization (“adjusted EBITDA”) is a non-GAAP operating financial measure that the Company defines as net earnings plus interest, discontinued operations, depreciation and amortization, and other non-cash items including deferred (stock) compensation, the LIFO provision, as well as adjustments for items that do not reflect the ongoing operating activities of the Company and costs associated with the closing of operational locations.

The Company believes that adjusted EBITDA provides a meaningful representation of its operating performance for the Company ~~as a whole~~ and for its operating segments. The Company considers adjusted EBITDA as an additional way to measure operating performance on an ongoing basis. Adjusted EBITDA is meant to reflect the ongoing operating performance of all of its distribution and retail operations; consequently, it excludes the impact of items that could be considered “non-operating” or “non-core” in nature, and also excludes the contributions of activities classified as discontinued operations. Because adjusted EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA by segment are performance measures that management uses to allocate resources, assess performance against its peers and evaluate overall performance, the Company believes it provides useful information for both management and its investors. In addition, securities analysts, fund managers and other shareholders and stakeholders that communicate with the Company request its operating financial results in adjusted EBITDA format.

Adjusted EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA by segment are not measures of performance under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and should not be considered as a substitute for net earnings, cash flows from operating activities and other income or cash flow statement data. The Company’s definitions of adjusted EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA by segment may not be identical to similarly titled measures reported by other companies.

Following is a reconciliation of net (loss) earnings to adjusted EBITDA for the 12 ~~weeks~~ and 40 weeks ended October ~~7, 2017~~5, 2019 and October ~~8, 2016.~~

	12 Weeks Ended						40 Weeks Ended
	October 7,			October 8,			October 7,			October 8,			12 Weeks Ended						40 Weeks Ended
(In thousands)	2017			2016			2017			2016			October 5, 2019			October 6, 2018			October 5, 2019			October 6, 2018
Net (loss) earnings	$	(123,506	)	$	16,648		$	(87,452	)	$	43,982		$	(337	)	$	17,465		$	318		$	47,580
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax		54			82			125			268			27			80			126			238
Income taxes		(76,445	)		8,864			(56,809	)		25,635
Income tax (benefit) expense														(1,656	)		2,374			(1,973	)		12,381
Other expenses, net		6,055			4,273			18,880			14,262			17,745			6,887			46,887			22,173
Operating (loss) earnings		(193,842	)		29,867			(125,256	)		84,147
Operating earnings														15,779			26,806			45,358			82,372
Adjustments:
LIFO expense (benefit)		192			(341	)		2,474			2,130
LIFO expense														1,268			654			3,761			2,349
Depreciation and amortization		19,455			17,927			63,553			58,931			20,351			19,247			67,513			63,272
Merger/acquisition and integration		2,392			2,427			7,031			4,237			—			521			1,364			3,531
Restructuring charges and asset impairment		224,653			2,662			225,660			23,714			1,296			232			10,215			5,269
Fresh Kitchen start-up costs		2,086			—			6,688			—			—			—			—			1,366
Fresh Kitchen operating losses														2,204			—			2,204			—
Stock-based compensation		1,102			943			8,593			7,010			638			773			6,735			7,040
Other non-cash (gains) charges		(138	)		(71	)		(661	)		3
Non-cash rent														(1,082	)		(187	)		(4,542	)		(818	)
Costs associated with Project One Team														—			—			5,428			—
Organizational realignment costs														935			—			1,812			—
Other non-cash charges														187			258			710			785
Adjusted EBITDA	$	55,900		$	53,414		$	188,082		$	180,172		$	41,576		$	48,304		$	140,558		$	165,166
Reconciliation of operating earnings (loss) to adjusted EBITDA by segment:
Food Distribution:
Operating earnings	$	20,350		$	18,957		$	68,868		$	64,040
Adjustments:
LIFO expense (benefit)		98			(348	)		1,361			941
Depreciation and amortization		6,862			4,842			22,291			16,139
Merger/acquisition and integration		939			639			5,254			1,201
Restructuring charges and asset impairment		379			207			1,280			4,749
Fresh Kitchen start-up costs		2,086			—			6,688			—
Stock-based compensation		488			409			3,999			3,090
Other non-cash (gains) charges		(57	)		(61	)		(11	)		137
Adjusted EBITDA	$	31,145		$	24,645		$	109,730		$	90,297
Military:
Operating earnings	$	1,118		$	2,862		$	4,517		$	8,792
Adjustments:
LIFO (benefit) expense		(63	)		134			329			678
Depreciation and amortization		2,786			2,693			8,832			8,850
Merger/acquisition and integration		1,453			—			1,453			1
Restructuring charges (gains)		500			18			500			(241	)
Stock-based compensation		186			171			1,313			1,178
Other non-cash charges (gains)		1			58			(15	)		262
Adjusted EBITDA	$	5,981		$	5,936		$	16,929		$	19,520
Retail:
Operating (loss) earnings	$	(215,310	)	$	8,048		$	(198,641	)	$	11,315
Adjustments:
LIFO expense (benefit)		157			(127	)		784			511
Depreciation and amortization		9,807			10,392			32,430			33,942
Merger/acquisition and integration		—			1,788			324			3,035
Restructuring charges and asset impairment		223,774			2,437			223,880			19,206
Stock-based compensation		428			363			3,281	��		2,742
Other non-cash gains		(82	)		(68	)		(635	)		(396	)
Adjusted EBITDA	$	18,774		$	22,833		$	61,423		$	70,355

28Following is a reconciliation of operating earnings (loss) to adjusted EBITDA by segment for the 12 and 40 weeks ended October 5, 2019 and October 6, 2018.

	12 Weeks Ended						40 Weeks Ended
(In thousands)	October 5, 2019			October 6, 2018			October 5, 2019			October 6, 2018
Food Distribution:
Operating earnings	$	11,699		$	19,815		$	36,564		$	63,060
Adjustments:
LIFO expense		639			245			1,869			929
Depreciation and amortization		7,390			7,540			25,368			24,179
Merger/acquisition and integration		—			479			(130	)		3,419
Restructuring charges (gains) and asset impairment		1,043			(68	)		10,724			1,292
Fresh Kitchen start-up costs		—			—			—			1,366
Fresh Kitchen operating losses		2,204			—			2,204			—
Stock-based compensation		302			351			3,319			3,318
Non-cash rent		147			41			353			115
Costs associated with Project One Team		—			—			2,877			—
Organizational realignment costs		495			—			960			—
Other non-cash charges		14			119			391			466
Adjusted EBITDA	$	23,933		$	28,522		$	84,499		$	98,144
Military:
Operating (loss) earnings	$	(2,646	)	$	1,508		$	(5,806	)	$	6,120
Adjustments:
LIFO expense		372			146			1,034			544
Depreciation and amortization		2,764			2,816			9,097			9,257
Merger/acquisition and integration		—			—			—			4
Restructuring charges (gains)		—			29			—			(801	)
Stock-based compensation		114			155			1,091			1,181
Non-cash rent		(80	)		(74	)		(283	)		(249	)
Costs associated with Project One Team		—			—			706			—
Organizational realignment costs		122			—			236			—
Other non-cash (gains) charges		(70	)		31			(91	)		57
Adjusted EBITDA	$	576		$	4,611		$	5,984		$	16,113
Retail:
Operating earnings	$	6,726		$	5,483		$	14,600		$	13,192
Adjustments:
LIFO expense		257			263			858			876
Depreciation and amortization		10,197			8,891			33,048			29,836
Merger/acquisition and integration		—			42			1,494			108
Restructuring charges (gains) and asset impairment		253			271			(509	)		4,778
Stock-based compensation		222			267			2,325			2,541
Non-cash rent		(1,149	)		(154	)		(4,612	)		(684	)
Costs associated with Project One Team		—			—			1,845			—
Organizational realignment costs		318			—			616			—
Other non-cash charges		243			108			410			262
Adjusted EBITDA	$	17,067		$	15,171		$	50,075		$	50,909

The following table summarizes the Company’s consolidated statements of cash flows:

~~(a)~~ Prior period amounts have been adjusted for the impact of the adoption of ASU 2016-09. Refer to Note 2 of the notes to condensed consolidated financial statements included in Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for further information.

Net cash provided by operating activities. Net cash provided by operating activities decreased during the current year-to-date period from the prior year-to-date period by approximately ~~$9.6~~$2.5 million ~~mainly~~and was primarily due to ~~the timing of~~lower cash generated from earnings, mostly offset by improvements in working capital ~~requirements, particularly higher~~including management of accounts ~~receivable balances associated with sales to new and existing distribution customers, largely offset by lower customer advances to support sales growth compared to the prior year period.~~payable.

Net cash used in investing activities. Net cash used in investing activities increased ~~$224.6~~$72.1 million in the current year compared to the prior year primarily due to the ~~recent~~Martin’s acquisition ~~(see Note 3~~made in the current year quarter, partially offset by proceeds from the sale of real property for a previously closed site.

Capital expenditures were $46.9 in the current year compared to $52.6 million in the ~~condensed consolidated financial statements).~~

prior year. The Food Distribution, Military and Retail segments utilized ~~25.1%~~34.2%, ~~11.1%~~8.6% and ~~63.8%~~57.2% of capital expenditures, respectively, in the current year.

Net cash ~~provided by (used in)~~used in financing activities. Net cash ~~provided by~~used in financing activities ~~increased $218.9~~decreased $74.4 million in the current year compared to the prior year primarily due to ~~borrowings on~~ the ~~revolving credit facility to fund~~Martin’s acquisition which reduced the ~~recent acquisition.~~funds available for the paydown of debt.

Net cash used in discontinued operations. Net cash used in discontinued operations contains the net cash flows of the Company’s Retail and Food Distribution discontinued operations and is primarily composed of facility maintenance expenditures.

Total debt, including ~~capital~~finance lease ~~obligations and current maturities,~~liabilities, was ~~$670.9~~$693.1 million and ~~$431.1~~$698.1 million as of October ~~7, 2017~~5, 2019 and December ~~31, 2016,~~29, 2018, respectively. The ~~increase~~decrease in total debt was driven by ~~drawdowns on~~payments, mostly offset by the ~~credit facility to finance the recent acquisition.~~

~~Subsequent to the end~~current year acquisition of the third quarter of fiscal 2017, the Company paid the outstanding balance on the Senior secured term loan of $52.2 million with proceeds from its Senior secured revolving credit facility. As a result of this transaction, annual interest expense is expected to be reduced through a reduction of the average interest rates paid.Martin’s.

The Company’s principal sources of liquidity are cash flows generated from operations and its senior secured credit facility which has maximum available credit of ~~$1.0~~$1.04 billion. As of October ~~7, 2017,~~5, 2019, the senior secured ~~revolving~~ credit facility ~~and senior secured term loan collectively~~ had outstanding borrowings of ~~$627.7~~$652.5 million. Additional available borrowings under the Company’s ~~$1.0~~$1.04 billion credit facility are based on stipulated advance rates on eligible assets, as defined in the Credit Agreement. The Credit Agreement requires that the Company maintain excess availability of 10% of the borrowing base, as such term is defined in the Credit Agreement. The Company had excess availability after the 10% covenant of ~~$348.2~~$226.1 million at October ~~7, 2017.~~5, 2019. Payment of dividends and repurchases of outstanding shares are permitted, provided that certain levels of excess availability are maintained. The credit facility provides for the issuance of letters of credit, of which ~~$9.2~~$10.8 million were outstanding as of October ~~7, 2017.~~5, 2019. The revolving credit facility matures December ~~2021,~~18, 2023 and is secured by substantially all of the Company’s assets.

The Company believes that cash generated from operating activities and available borrowings under the credit facility will be sufficient to meet anticipated requirements for working capital, capital expenditures, dividend payments, and debt service obligations for the foreseeable future. However, there can be no assurance that the business will continue to generate cash flow at or above current levels or that the Company will maintain its ability to borrow under the Credit Agreement. In the third quarter, the Company executed an early payment of its term loan (Tranche A-2) in the amount of $55.0 million with available borrowings from its revolving credit facility. The Company expects to generate interest savings of nearly $2 million annually as a result of utilizing lower rate financing.

The Company’s current ratio (current assets to current liabilities) was ~~1.81-to-1~~1.72-to-1 at October ~~7, 2017~~5, 2019 compared to ~~1.77-to-1~~2.10-to-1 at December ~~31, 2016,~~29, 2018, and its investment in working capital was ~~$455.6~~$437.6 million at October ~~7, 2017~~5, 2019 compared to ~~$387.5~~$524.6 million at December ~~31, 2016.~~29, 2018. Net debt to total capital ratio was ~~0.48-to-1~~0.49-to-1 at October ~~7, 2017~~5, 2019 compared to ~~0.33-to-1~~0.49-to-1 at December ~~31, 2016.~~29, 2018. The current year ratios include the impact of the adoption of the new lease standard (ASU 2016-02) and therefore lack comparability to the prior year ratios.

Total net debt is a non-GAAP financial measure that is defined as long-term debt and ~~capital~~finance lease ~~obligations,~~liabilities, plus current maturities of long-term debt and ~~capital~~finance lease ~~obligations,~~liabilities, less cash and cash equivalents. The ratio of net debt to capital is a non-GAAP financial measure that is calculated by dividing net debt, as defined previously, by total capital (net debt plus total shareholders’ equity). The Company believes both management and its investors find the information useful because it reflects the amount of long-term debt obligations that are not covered by available cash and temporary investments. Total net debt is not a substitute for GAAP financial measures and may differ from similarly titled measures of other companies.

Following is a reconciliation of long-term debt and ~~capital~~finance lease ~~obligations~~liabilities to total net long-term debt and ~~capital~~finance lease ~~obligations~~liabilities as of October ~~7, 2017~~5, 2019 and December ~~31, 2016.~~

	October 7,			December 31,			October 5,			December 29,
	2017			2016
Current maturities of long-term debt and capital lease obligations	$	19,407		$	17,424
Long-term debt and capital lease obligations		651,537			413,675
(In thousands)							2019			2018
Current portion of long-term debt and finance lease liabilities							$	7,044		$	18,263
Long-term debt and finance lease liabilities								686,055			679,797
Total debt		670,944			431,099			693,099			698,060
Cash and cash equivalents		(13,154	)		(24,351	)		(23,436	)		(18,585	)
Total net long-term debt	$	657,790		$	406,748		$	669,663		$	679,475

For information on contractual obligations, see the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December ~~31, 2016.~~29, 2018. At October ~~7, 2017,~~5, 2019, there have been no material changes to the Company’s significant contractual obligations outside the ordinary course of business.

During the ~~year-to-date period~~quarter ended October ~~7, 2017,~~5, 2019, the Company returned ~~$41.1~~$6.9 million to shareholders from dividend ~~payments and share repurchases.~~payments. A ~~10.0%~~5.6% increase in the quarterly dividend rate from ~~$0.15~~$0.18 per share to ~~$0.165~~$0.19 per share was approved by the Board of Directors and announced on ~~March 6, 2017.~~February 28, 2019. Although the Company expects to continue to pay a quarterly cash dividend, adoption of a dividend policy does not commit the Board of Directors to declare future dividends. Each future dividend will be considered and declared by the Board of Directors at its discretion. Whether the Board of Directors continues to declare dividends depends on a number of factors, including the Company’s future financial condition, anticipated profitability and cash flows and compliance with the terms of its credit facilities.

Under the senior revolving credit facility, the Company is generally permitted to pay dividends in any fiscal year up to an amount such that all cash dividends, together with any cash distributions and share repurchases, do not exceed ~~$25.0~~$35.0 million. Additionally, the Company is generally permitted to pay cash dividends and repurchase shares in excess of ~~$25.0~~$35.0 million in any fiscal year so long as its Excess Availability, as defined in the senior revolving credit facility, is in excess of 10% of the Total Borrowing Base, as defined in the senior revolving credit facility, before and after giving effect to the repurchases and dividends.

The Company has also made certain commercial commitments that extend beyond October ~~7, 2017.~~5, 2019. These commitments consist primarily of ~~operating leases and~~ purchase commitments (as disclosed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December ~~31, 2016)~~29, 2018), standby letters of credit of ~~$9.2~~$10.8 million as of October ~~7, 2017,~~5, 2019, and interest on long-term debt and ~~capital~~finance lease ~~obligations.~~liabilities.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses, and the related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an ongoing basis, the Company evaluates its estimates, including those related to bad debts, inventories, intangible assets, assets held for sale, long-lived assets, income taxes, self-insurance reserves, restructuring costs, retirement benefits, stock-based compensation, contingencies and litigation. Management bases its estimates on historical experience and various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that may not be readily apparent from other sources. Based on the Company’s ongoing review, the Company makes adjustments it considers appropriate under the facts and circumstances. This discussion and analysis of the Company’s financial condition and results of operations is based upon the Company’s consolidated financial statements. The Company believes these accounting policies and others set forth in Item 8, Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December ~~31, 2016~~29, 2018 should be reviewed as they are integral to the understanding the Company’s financial condition and results of operations. The Company has discussed the development, selection and disclosure of these accounting policies with the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors. The accompanying financial statements are prepared using the same critical accounting policies discussed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December ~~31, 2016.~~29, 2018.

Refer to Note 2 in the notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements for further information.

There have been no material changes in market risk of SpartanNash from the information provided in Part II, Item 7A, “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk,” of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December ~~31, 2016.~~29, 2018.

An evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of SpartanNash Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as currently defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) was performed as of October ~~7, 2017~~5, 2019 (the “Evaluation Date”). This evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of SpartanNash Company’s management, including its Interim Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) andChief Accounting Officer (“CAO”). As of the Evaluation Date, SpartanNash Company’s management, including the CEO, CFO and CAO, concluded that SpartanNash’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the Evaluation Date to ensure that material information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Company files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Company files or submits under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 is accumulated and communicated to management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers as appropriate to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure. During the third quarter there was no change in SpartanNash’s internal control over financial reporting that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, SpartanNash’s internal control over financial reporting.

The following table provides information regarding SpartanNash’s purchases of its own common stock during the 12 week period ended October ~~7, 2017. All employee transactions are under associate stock compensation plans.~~5, 2019. These may include: (1) shares of SpartanNash common stock delivered in satisfaction of the exercise price and/or tax withholding obligations by holders of employee stock options who exercised options, and (2) shares submitted for cancellation to satisfy tax withholding obligations that occur upon the vesting of the restricted shares. The value of the shares delivered or withheld is determined by the applicable stock compensation plan. For the first quarter of 2019, all shares purchased by SpartanNash related to shares submitted for cancellation to satisfy tax withholding obligations that occur upon the vesting of the restricted shares.

During the fourth quarter of 2017, the Board authorized a publicly announced $50 million share repurchase program, expiring in 2022. No repurchases were made under this program during the third quarter of 2019. At October 5, 2019 $45.0 million remains available under the program.

The following documents are filed as exhibits to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q:

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Michigan		38-0593940
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

850 76^th Street, S.W. P.O. Box 8700 Grand Rapids, Michigan		49518
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)		(Zip Code)

Acquisitions (Note 8)		~~(b)~~	~~Net of accumulated impairment charges of $275.6 million.~~2,387
Balance at October 5, 2019	$		181,035

(In thousands)	Indefinite-lived Intangible Assets
Balance at December 29, 2018	$	69,746
Acquisitions (Note 4)		17,632
Disposals		(50	)
Impairment (Note 6)		(13,966	)
Balance at October 5, 2019	$	73,362

	October 7,			December 31,
(In thousands)	2017			2016
Senior secured revolving credit facility, due December 2021	$	575,550		$	359,127
Senior secured term loan, due December 2021		52,172			26,954
Capital lease obligations		44,114			48,255
Other, 2.61% - 8.75%, due 2019 - 2020		6,238			5,028
Total debt - Principal		678,074			439,364
Unamortized debt issuance costs		(7,130	)		(8,265	)
Total debt		670,944			431,099
Less current portion		19,407			17,424
Total long-term debt	$	651,537		$	413,675

	October 7,		December 31,
(In thousands)	2017		2016
Book value of debt instruments, excluding debt financing costs:
Current maturities of long-term debt and capital lease obligations	$	19,407	$	17,424
Long-term debt and capital lease obligations		658,667		421,940
Total book value of debt instruments		678,074		439,364
Fair value of debt instruments, excluding debt financing costs		679,367		440,759
Excess of fair value over book value	$	1,293	$	1,395

~~Unobservable Input~~	~~Range~~
~~Discount rate~~		~~11.80%~~
~~Probability of payments~~	~~0% - 100%~~
~~Projected fiscal year(s) of payments~~	~~2017 - 2019~~

(In thousands)	October 5, 2019
Operating leases:
Operating lease assets	$		272,591

Current portion of operating lease liabilities	$		41,795
Noncurrent operating lease liabilities			273,631
Total operating lease liabilities	$		315,426
Finance leases:
Property and equipment, at cost	$		63,000
Accumulated amortization			(30,262	)
Property and equipment, net	$		32,738

Current portion of finance lease liabilities	$		5,135
Noncurrent finance lease liabilities			32,422
Total finance lease liabilities	$		37,557

Weighted average remaining lease term:
Operating leases		9.0 years
Finance leases		10.2 years

Weighted average discount rate:
Operating leases			5.7	%
Finance leases			8.2	%

	Operating		Finance
(In thousands)	Leases		Leases			Total
2019	$	14,342		2,062			16,404
2020		56,260		7,284			63,544
2021		51,325		5,479			56,805
2022		45,123		4,891			50,014
2023		40,345		4,510			44,855
Thereafter		197,210		32,195			229,405
Total		404,605		56,421			461,027
Less interest		89,179		18,864			108,043
Present value of lease liabilities		315,426		37,557			352,984
Less current portion		41,795		5,135			46,930
Long-term lease liabilities	$	273,631	$	32,422	$		306,054

	Percentage of Net Sales								Percentage Change
	12 Weeks Ended				40 Weeks Ended				12 Weeks Ended			40 Weeks Ended
	October 5, 2019		October 6, 2018		October 5, 2019		October 6, 2018		October 5, 2019			October 5, 2019
Net sales		100.0		100.0		100.0		100.0		6.0			6.0
Gross profit		14.5		13.6		14.6		14.0		13.4			10.6
Selling, general and administrative		13.7		12.1		13.8		12.5		19.6			16.3
Merger/acquisition and integration		—		0.0		0.0		0.1		(100.0	)		(61.4	)
Restructuring charges and asset impairment		0.1		0.0		0.2		0.1	**				93.9

	Percentage of Net Sales														Percentage Change
															12 Weeks
	12 Weeks Ended							40 Weeks Ended							Ended
	October 7,				October 8,			October 7,				October 8,			October 7,
	2017				2016			2017				2016			2017
Net sales		100.0		%		100.0	%		100.0		%		100.0	%		5.9
Gross profit		13.7				14.2			14.3				14.4			2.5
Selling, general and administrative expenses		12.0				12.3	*		12.6				12.5			3.7
Merger/acquisition and integration		0.1				0.1			0.1				0.1			(1.4	)
Restructuring charges and goodwill/asset impairment		11.8				0.1			3.6				0.4			8,339.3
Operating (loss) earnings		(10.2	)			1.7			(2.0	)			1.4			(749.0	)
Other income and expenses		0.3				0.3	*		0.3				0.2			41.7
(Loss) earnings before income taxes and discontinued operations		(10.5	)			1.4			(2.3	)			1.2			(881.0	)
Income taxes		(4.0	)	*		0.5			(0.9	)			0.5	*		(962.4	)
(Loss) earnings from continuing operations		(6.5	)			0.9			(1.4	)			0.7			(837.9	)
Loss from discontinued operations, net of taxes		—				—			—				—			(34.1	)
Net (loss) earnings		(6.5	)	%		0.9	%		(1.4	)	%		0.7	%		(841.9	)

			Average
	Total Number		Price Paid
Fiscal Period	of Shares Purchased		per Share
July 14 - August 10, 2019
Employee Transactions		—	$	—
Repurchase Program		—	$	—
August 11 - September 7, 2019
Employee Transactions		—	$	—
Repurchase Program		—	$	—
September 8 - October 5, 2019
Employee Transactions		1,402	$	11.33
Repurchase Program		—	$	—
Total for quarter ended October 5, 2019
Employee Transactions		1,402	$	11.33
Repurchase Program		—	$	—

	Total
	Number		Average
	of Shares		Price Paid
Period	Purchased		per Share
July 16 – August 12, 2017
Repurchase Program		265,378	$	26.86
August 13 – September 9, 2017
None		—	$	—
September 10 – October 7, 2017
Employee Transactions		1,550	$	26.46
Repurchase Program		296,472	$	25.30
Total for Quarter ended October 7, 2017
Employee Transactions		1,550	$	26.46
Repurchase Program		561,850	$	26.03

Exhibit Number		Document

~~2.1~~		~~Asset Purchase Agreement dated as of November 3, 2016 by and among SpartanNash Company, Caito Food Service, Inc., Blue Ribbon Transport, Inc., and Matthew Caito as Seller’s Representative. Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on~~ ~~November 4, 2016. Incorporated herein by reference.~~

~~2.2~~		Amendment to Asset Purchase Agreement dated as of January 6, 2017 by and among SpartanNash Company, Caito Food Service, Inc., Blue Ribbon Transport, Inc., and Matthew Caito as Seller’s Representative~~. Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 9, 2017. Incorporated herein by reference.~~

3.1		Restated Articles of Incorporation of SpartanNash Company, as amended. Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 15, 2017. Incorporated herein by reference.

3.2		Bylaws of SpartanNash Company, as ~~amended~~.amended. Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, filed on March 1, 2017. ~~Here incorporated~~Incorporated herein by reference.

10.1		Executive Employment Agreement between SpartanNash Company and ~~Mark Shamber~~Dennis Eidson..

10.2		~~Executive Severance~~Phantom Stock Award Agreement between SpartanNash Company and ~~Mark Shamber~~Dennis Eidson..

31.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of ~~2002~~2002..

31.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of ~~2002~~2002..

31.3		Certification of Chief Accounting Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of ~~2002~~.2002.

32.1		Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of ~~2002~~2002..

101.INS		Inline XBRL Instance Document - the instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document.

101.SCH		Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

101.CAL		Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

101.LAB		Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document

101.PRE		Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

101.DEF		Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

104		The cover page from the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 5, 2019, has been formatted in Inline XBRL.

	12 Weeks Ended								40 Weeks Ended
	October 7,				October 8,				October 7,				October 8,
(In thousands, except percentages)	2017				2016				2017				2016
Center store (a)	$	1,187,631	62.3	%	$	1,143,964	63.6	%	$	3,784,779	61.0	%	$	3,731,362	63.2	%
Fresh (b)		608,136	31.9			544,200	30.2			2,051,954	33.1			1,821,347	30.8
Pharmacy		80,455	4.2			84,039	4.7			271,170	4.4			269,524	4.6
Fuel		30,422	1.6			27,882	1.5			95,954	1.5			84,183	1.4
Consolidated net sales	$	1,906,644	100.0	%	$	1,800,085	100.0	%	$	6,203,857	100.0	%	$	5,906,416	100.0	%