Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES ☒ NO ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically ~~and posted on its corporate Web site, if any,~~ every Interactive Data File required to be submitted ~~and posted~~ pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit ~~and post~~ such files). YES ☒ NO ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicated by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒

As of April ~~27, 2018, 891,593~~26, 2019, 1,260,268 units of limited partnership interest (“Interests”) are outstanding, each representing $1,000 of limited partner capital. There is no public or private market for such Interests.

	March 30,		December 31,		March 29,		December 31,
(Dollars in millions)	2018		2017		2019		2018
ASSETS:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	1,017	$	846	$	1,370	$	1,498
Cash and investments segregated under federal regulations		9,069		10,099		7,052		8,241
Securities purchased under agreements to resell		824		1,164		1,232		911
Receivable from:
Receivables from:
Clients		3,335		3,300		3,317		3,359
Mutual funds, insurance companies and other		600		540		620		555
Brokers, dealers and clearing organizations		256		247		300		261
Securities owned, at fair value:
Investment securities		251		258		270		250
Inventory securities		97		50		57		43
Lease right-of-use asset						795		—
Equipment, property and improvements, at cost, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization		547		544		566		555
Other assets		122		128		116		142

TOTAL ASSETS	$	16,118	$	17,176	$	15,695	$	15,815

LIABILITIES:
Payable to:
Payables to:
Clients	$	12,024	$	12,810	$	10,223	$	11,117
Brokers, dealers and clearing organizations		121		67		95		90
Lease liability						809		-
Accrued compensation and employee benefits		1,076		1,339		1,182		1,465
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other		189		165		212		288
		13,410		14,381		12,521		12,960
Contingencies (Note 7)
Contingencies (Note 8)

Partnership capital subject to mandatory redemption, net of reserve for anticipated withdrawals and partnership loans:
Limited partners		892		890		1,261		884
Subordinated limited partners		509		463		523		504
General partners		1,111		1,152		1,179		1,119
Total		2,512		2,505		2,963		2,507
Reserve for anticipated withdrawals		196		290		211		348
Total partnership capital subject to mandatory redemption		2,708		2,795		3,174		2,855

TOTAL LIABILITIES	$	16,118	$	17,176	$	15,695	$	15,815

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

	Three Months Ended				Three Months Ended
(Dollars in millions, except per unit information and units outstanding)	March 30, 2018		March 31, 2017		March 29, 2019		March 30, 2018
Revenue:
Fee revenue
Asset-based	$	1,453	$	1,115	$	1,559	$	1,453
Account and activity		172		172		172		172
Total fee revenue		1,625		1,287		1,731		1,625
Trade revenue		364		457		368		364
Interest and dividends		79		58		103		79
Other revenue		6		13		28		6
Total revenue		2,074		1,815		2,230		2,074
Interest expense		32		18		40		32
Net revenue		2,042		1,797		2,190		2,042
Operating expenses:
Compensation and benefits		1,454		1,277		1,536		1,454
Occupancy and equipment		109		102		119		109
Communications and data processing		80		81		86		80
Fund sub-adviser fees		30		20		36		30
Advertising		25		23		24		25
Professional and consulting fees		18		17		23		18
Postage and shipping		14		15		15		14
Other operating expenses		79		65		110		79
Total operating expenses		1,809		1,600		1,949		1,809

Income before allocations to partners		233		197		241		233

Allocations to partners:
Limited partners		27		25		37		27
Subordinated limited partners		30		25		29		30
General partners		176		147		175		176
Net Income	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—

Income allocated to limited partners per weighted average $1,000 equivalent limited partnership unit outstanding	$	30.16	$	27.33	$	29.20	$	30.16

Weighted average $1,000 equivalent limited partnership units outstanding		893,700		901,720		1,262,740		893,700

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.


(Dollars in millions)	Limited Partnership Capital			Subordinated Limited Partnership Capital			General Partnership Capital			Total

Q1 2018:

TOTAL PARTNERSHIP CAPITAL SUBJECT TO MANDATORY REDEMPTION, DECEMBER 31, 2017	$	956		$	499		$	1,340		$	2,795
Reserve for anticipated withdrawals		(66	)		(36	)		(188	)		(290	)
Partnership capital subject to mandatory redemption, net of reserve for anticipated withdrawals, December 31, 2017	$	890		$	463		$	1,152		$	2,505
Partnership loans outstanding, December 31, 2017		—			3			294			297
Total partnership capital, including capital financed with partnership loans, net of reserve for anticipated withdrawals, December 31, 2017		890			466			1,446			2,802
Issuance of partnership interests		4			51			170			225
Redemption of partnership interests		(2	)		(6	)		(151	)		(159	)
Income allocated to partners		27			30			176			233
Distributions		—			(1	)		(11	)		(12	)
Total partnership capital, including capital financed with partnership loans		919			540			1,630			3,089
Partnership loans outstanding, March 30, 2018		—			(2	)		(379	)		(381	)
TOTAL PARTNERSHIP CAPITAL SUBJECT TO MANDATORY REDEMPTION, MARCH 30, 2018	$	919		$	538		$	1,251		$	2,708
Reserve for anticipated withdrawals		(27	)		(29	)		(140	)		(196	)
Partnership capital subject to mandatory redemption, net of reserve for anticipated withdrawals, March 30, 2018	$	892		$	509		$	1,111		$	2,512


Q1 2019:

TOTAL PARTNERSHIP CAPITAL SUBJECT TO MANDATORY REDEMPTION, DECEMBER 31, 2018	$	956		$	545		$	1,354		$	2,855
Reserve for anticipated withdrawals		(72	)		(41	)		(235	)		(348	)
Partnership capital subject to mandatory redemption, net of reserve for anticipated withdrawals, December 31, 2018	$	884		$	504		$	1,119		$	2,507
Partnership loans outstanding, December 31, 2018		—			4			328			332
Total partnership capital, including capital financed with partnership loans, net of reserve for anticipated withdrawals, December 31, 2018		884			508			1,447			2,839
Issuance of partnership interests		380			51			162			593
Redemption of partnership interests		(3	)		(31	)		(37	)		(71	)
Income allocated to partners		37			29			175			241
Distributions		—			—			(6	)		(6	)
Total partnership capital, including capital financed with partnership loans		1,298			557			1,741			3,596
Partnership loans outstanding, March 29, 2019		—			(5	)		(417	)		(422	)
TOTAL PARTNERSHIP CAPITAL SUBJECT TO MANDATORY REDEMPTION, MARCH 29, 2019	$	1,298		$	552		$	1,324		$	3,174
Reserve for anticipated withdrawals		(37	)		(29	)		(145	)		(211	)
Partnership capital subject to mandatory redemption, net of reserve for anticipated withdrawals, March 29, 2019	$	1,261		$	523		$	1,179		$	2,963

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

	Three Months Ended						Three Months Ended
(Dollars in millions)	March 30, 2018			March 31, 2017			March 29, 2019			March 30, 2018
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Income before allocations to partners		233			197			241			233
Depreciation and amortization		22			20			25			22

Changes in assets and liabilities:
Investments segregated under federal regulations		402			9			(491	)		402
Securities purchased under agreements to resell		340			123			(321	)		340
Net payable to clients		(821	)		(11	)		(852	)		(821	)
Net receivable from brokers, dealers and clearing organizations		45			50			(34	)		45
Receivable from mutual funds, insurance companies and other		(60	)		(89	)		(65	)		(60	)
Securities owned		(40	)		(37	)		(34	)		(40	)
Lease right-of-use asset								10			—
Other assets		6			(6	)		26			6
Lease liability								4			—
Accrued compensation and employee benefits		(263	)		(177	)		(283	)		(263	)
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other		24			14			(76	)		24
Net cash (used in)/provided by operating activities		(112	)		93
Net cash used in operating activities								(1,850	)		(112	)

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchase of equipment, property and improvements, net		(25	)		(23	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(25	)		(23	)
Purchase of equipment, property and improvements								(36	)		(25	)
Cash used in investing activities								(36	)		(25	)

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Issuance of partnership interests		57			64			430			57
Redemption of partnership interests		(159	)		(153	)		(71	)		(159	)
Distributions from partnership capital		(218	)		(157	)		(281	)		(218	)
Net cash used in financing activities		(320	)		(246	)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities								78			(320	)
Net decrease in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash		(457	)		(176	)		(1,808	)		(457	)

CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS AND RESTRICTED CASH:
Beginning of period		8,537			9,572			8,737			8,537
End of period	$	8,080		$	9,396		$	6,929		$	8,080

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P. and all wholly-owned subsidiaries (collectively, the “Partnership” or "JFC"). All material intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The ~~results~~financial position of the Partnership’s subsidiaries in Canada as of February 28, ~~2018~~2019 and November 30, ~~2017~~2018 are included in the Partnership’s Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition and the results for the three month periods ended February 28, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017~~2018 are included in the Partnership’s Consolidated Statements of Income, Consolidated Statements of Changes in Partnership Capital Subject to Mandatory Redemption, and Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows because of the timing of the Partnership’s financial reporting process.

The Partnership’s principal operating subsidiary, Edward D. Jones & Co., L.P. (“Edward Jones”), is a registered broker-dealer and investment adviser in the United States (“U.S.”), and one of Edward Jones’ subsidiaries is a registered broker-dealer in Canada. Through these entities, the Partnership primarily serves individual investors in the U.S. and Canada. Edward Jones is a retail brokerage business and primarily derives revenues from fees for providing investment advisory and other account services to its clients, fees for assets held by clients, the distribution of mutual fund shares, and commissions for the purchase or sale of securities and the purchase of insurance products. The Partnership conducts business throughout the U.S. and Canada with its clients, various brokers, dealers, clearing organizations, depositories and banks. Trust services are offered to Edward Jones’ U.S. clients through Edward Jones Trust Company (“Trust Co.”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Partnership. Olive Street Investment Advisers, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Partnership, provides investment advisory services to the sub-advised mutual funds in the Bridge Builder® ~~Trust.~~Trust ("BB Trust"). Passport Research, Ltd., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Partnership, provides investment advisory services to the Edward Jones Money Market ~~Fund.~~Fund (the "Fund").

The Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared on the accrual basis of accounting in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles ~~generally accepted in the U.S.~~ (“GAAP”), which require the use of certain estimates by management in determining the Partnership’s assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. Actual results could differ from these estimates. The Partnership has evaluated subsequent events through the date these Consolidated Financial Statements were issued and identified no matters requiring disclosure.

The interim financial information included herein is unaudited. However, in the opinion of management, such information includes all adjustments, consisting primarily of normal recurring accruals, which are necessary for a fair statement of the results of interim operations.

There have been no material changes to the Partnership’s significant accounting policies or disclosures of recently issued accounting standards as described in Part II, Item 8 – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 1 of the Partnership's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018 (the "Annual Report"), except as disclosed in Note 2 herein. The results of operations for the three month period ended March ~~30, 2018~~29, 2019 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the year ending December 31, ~~2018.~~2019. These unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and the Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto included in the Annual Report.

~~In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2014-09,~~ ~~Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASU 2014-09”)~~, a comprehensive new revenue recognition standard that supersedes nearly all existing revenue recognition guidance. The objective of ASU 2014-09 is for a company to recognize revenue when it transfers promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. In August 2015, the FASB deferred the effective date of ASU 2014-09 to the first quarter of 2018. An entity can elect to adopt ASU 2014-09 using one of two methods, either full retrospective adoption to each prior reporting period, or modified retrospective adoption by recognizing the cumulative effect of adoption at the date of initial application. Effective January 1, 2018, the Partnership adopted ASU 2014-09 using the modified retrospective method. As a result of adoption, there was no cumulative impact to Partnership capital as of January 1, 2018, no impact to total revenue for the quarter ended March 30, 2018 and no impact to the consolidated statements of financial condition as of March 30, 2018. There was a presentation change that did not impact the timing or amount of total revenue, net revenue or income before allocations to partners. See Note 3 for additional information.

~~In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-01,~~ ~~Financial Instruments – Overall (Subtopic 825-10) – Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities~~ (“ASU 2016-01”). ASU 2016-01 provides a comprehensive framework for the classification and measurement of financial assets and liabilities. The Partnership adopted ASU 2016-01 effective January 1, 2018 and adoption did not have a material impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements.

~~In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-18,~~ ~~Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230) – Restricted Cash, a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force~~ (“ASU 2016-18”). ASU 2016-18 requires restricted cash to be included within cash and cash equivalents on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. The Partnership's restricted cash represents cash segregated in special reserve bank accounts for the benefit of U.S. clients pursuant to the Customer Protection Rule 15c3-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"). The Partnership adopted ASU 2016-18 on a retrospective basis during the first quarter of 2018, which resulted in including restricted cash of $7,063, $7,691, $8,370 and $8,525 as of March 30, 2018, December 31, 2017, March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively, to the cash and cash equivalents balances on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.

~~Revenue Recognition.~~ The Partnership's revenue is recognized based on contracts with clients, mutual fund companies, insurance companies and other product providers. As a full-service brokerage firm, Edward Jones provides clients with custodial services, including safekeeping of client funds, collecting and disbursing funds from a client's account, and providing trade confirmations and account statements. The Partnership does not charge a separate fee for these services. Revenue is generally recognized in the same manner for both the U.S. and Canada segments. The Partnership classifies its revenue into the following categories:

~~Asset-based fee revenue~~ – Revenue is derived from fees determined by the underlying value of client assets and includes advisory programs fees, service fees, and other asset-based fee revenue. The primary source of asset-based fee revenue is generated from program fees for investment advisory services provided within the Partnership’s advisory programs, including in the U.S., the Edward Jones Advisory Solutions® program (“Advisory Solutions”) and the Edward Jones Guided Solutions® program ("Guided Solutions") and, in Canada, the Edward Jones Portfolio Program® and the Edward Jones Guided Portfolios® program. Advisory program contracts outline the investment advisory services to be performed for a client under the contract and do not have a definite end date. Program fees are based on the average daily market value of client assets in the program and are charged to clients monthly and collected the following month. The investment advisory services performed in an advisory program contract are a series of distinct services that are substantially the same and have the same pattern of transfer to the client. As a result, the contract has one performance obligation and program fee revenue is recognized over time as clients simultaneously receive and consume the benefit from the investment advisory services performed by the Partnership.

In February 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) (“ASC 842”), which requires lessees to recognize leases with terms greater than 12 months on the balance sheet as lease right-of-use assets and lease liabilities. In July 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-11, Leases (Topic 842), which allows an entity to recognize a cumulative-effect adjustment to the opening balance of Partnership capital in the period of adoption and prior periods do not have to be restated. Effective January 1, 2019, the Partnership adopted ASC 842 and recorded a lease right-of-use asset of $785 and lease liability of $805 related to the Partnership's branch office network and home offices. The lease right-of-use asset was reduced by $20 for deferred rent on existing leases at adoption. The cumulative-effect adjustment to the opening balance of Partnership capital was zero and prior periods were not restated. The Partnership ~~has selling agreements with mutual fund and insurance companies~~elected the package of practical expedients for leases that ~~allow~~commenced prior to January 1, 2019, which allowed the Partnership to ~~sell that company's products~~not reassess whether any contracts are or contain leases, lease classification for expired or existing leases, and initial direct costs for existing leases. There was no material impact on the Consolidated Statements of Income, Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows or net capital requirements of Edward Jones. See Note 3 for additional information.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326) – Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments (“ASU 2016-13”). ASU 2016-13 removes the "probable" threshold for credit loss recognition, requiring companies to ~~clients (see~~ ~~Trade revenue~~ ~~below~~capture all expected credit losses and to consider a broader range of reasonable and supportable information to inform credit loss estimates. The Partnership is in the process of evaluating the update and expects to adopt ASU 2016-13 as of January 1, 2020 with no material impact to the Consolidated Financial Statements from adoption.

The Partnership leases branch office space under numerous operating leases from non-affiliates and financial advisors. Branch offices are generally leased for terms of five years and generally contain a renewal option. Renewal options are not included in the lease term because it is not reasonably certain the Partnership will exercise the renewal option. The Partnership also leases a few of its home office spaces from non-affiliates with terms ranging from 12 to 30 years.

The Partnership recognizes lease liabilities for future lease payments and lease right-of-use assets for the associated commissions earned from clients). The selling agreements, along with the prospectuses for mutual funds, also allow the Partnership to earn service fees for providing certain ongoing distributionright of use of an underlying asset within a contract. Current leases are all classified as operating leases. Lease right-of-use assets and ~~marketing support services for that company's products which~~lease liabilities are ~~held by Edward Jones clients. Service fees are generally based~~recognized on the ~~average daily market~~Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition at commencement date and calculated as the present value of ~~client assets held in a company's mutual fund or insurance product. For future service fees~~ the ~~Partnership may earn on existing client assets, market constraints prevent reasonably estimating~~sum of the ~~transaction price and estimates could result in significant revenue reversals. Thus, service fee revenue is recognized monthly at~~remaining fixed lease payments over the ~~time~~lease term. The lease right-of-use asset includes the market constraints have been removed, the transaction price is known and the services have been performed. Other asset-based fee revenue consists of revenue sharing, fund advisor fees, cash solutions and Trust Co. fees. The Partnership has agreements with clients or product providers to earn other asset-based fees for providing services, which generally include providing investment advice or service to clients or mutual funds, or marketing support or other services to product providers. Fees are generally based on asset values held in clients' accounts. The services performed for other asset-based fee contracts are a series of distinct services that are substantially the same and have the same pattern of transfer to the client. As a result, the contracts have one performance obligation and revenue is recognized over time as the customer simultaneously receives and consumes the benefitimpact from the services performed by the Partnership. For both service fees and other asset-based fee revenue, revenue is collected monthly or quarterly based on the agreements and the agreements generally do not have a term. Due to the timing of ~~receipt of information, the~~lease payments and straight-line rent expense. The Partnership ~~must use estimates in recording the accruals related to certain asset-based fees, which are~~used its incremental borrowing rate based on ~~historical trends~~information available at lease commencement as leases do not contain a readily determinable implicit rate. A single lease cost, or rent expense, is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term. The Partnership does not separate lease components (i.e. fixed payments including rent, real estate taxes and insurance costs) from non-lease components (i.e. common-area maintenance) and recognizes them as a single lease component. Variable lease payments not included within lease contracts are ~~adjusted to reflect market conditions~~expensed as incurred.

For the three months ended March 29, 2019, cash paid for amounts included in the ~~period covered.~~ measurement of operating lease liabilities was $67 and lease right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for new operating lease liabilities was $67. As of March 29, 2019, the weighted-average remaining lease term was four years, and the weighted-average discount rate was 3.5%.

~~Account and activity fee revenue~~ – Revenue is derived from fees based on the number of accounts or activity and includes shareholder accounting services fees, self-directed individual retirement account ("IRA"), and other activity-based fee revenue from clients, mutual fund companies and insurance companies. The Partnership has agreements with mutual fund companies for shareholder accounting services in which the Partnership performs certain transfer agent support services, which may include tracking client holdings, distributing dividends and shareholder information to clients, and responding to client inquiries. Shareholder accounting services fees are based on the number of mutual fund positions held by clients and fees are collected monthly or quarterly based on the agreements, which generally do not have a term. The transfer agent support services performed in a shareholder accounting services contract are a series of distinct services that are substantially the same and have the same pattern of transfer to the client. As a result, the contract has one performance obligation and revenue is recognized over time as the mutual fund company simultaneously receives and consumes the benefit from the services performed by the Partnership. The Partnership also earns retirement account fees for providing reporting services pursuant to the Internal Revenue Code and account maintenance services. Clients are charged an annual fee per account for these services. Revenue is recognized over a one-year period as the services are provided, which are simultaneously received and consumed by the client.

~~Trade revenue~~ – Revenue is derived from fees based on client transactions and includes commissions and principal transactions. The primary source of trade revenue is commissions revenue which consists of charges to clients for the purchase or sale of mutual fund shares, equities and insurance products. Principal transactions revenue primarily results from the Partnership’s distribution of and participation in principal trading activities in municipal obligations, over-the-counter corporate obligations, and certificates of deposit. Principal transactions are generally entered into by the Partnership to facilitate a client's buy or sell order for certain fixed income products. Brokerage contracts outline the transaction services to be performed for a client under the contract and do not have a term. The transaction charge to clients varies based on the product and size of the trade. The Partnership also has contracts with various companies which allow the Partnership to sell that company's products to clients and receive a certain commission. Trade revenue is recognized at a point in time when the transaction is placed, or trade date. On trade date the client obtains control through a right to either own a security for a purchase or receive payment for a sale. Transaction charges are received no later than settlement date.

~~Interest and dividends revenue~~ – Interest revenue is earned on client margin (loan) account balances. In addition, interest revenue is earned on cash and cash equivalents, cash and investments segregated under federal regulations, securities purchased under agreements to resell and Partnership loans, none of which is based on revenue contracts with clients.

Other forms of revenue are recorded on an accrual basis. Activity or transaction-based revenue is recorded at a point in time when the transaction occurs and asset-based revenue is recorded over time as the services are provided.

For the first quarter of 2019, operating lease cost was $66 and variable lease costs not included in the lease liability were $14, resulting in a total lease cost of $80. The Partnership's future undiscounted cash outflows for operating leases as of March 29, 2019 are summarized below:

While the rights and obligations for leases that have not yet commenced are not significant, the Partnership does continually enter into new branch office leases.

As of March ~~30, 2018~~29, 2019 and December 31, ~~2017, $379~~2018, $421 and ~~$346,~~$377, respectively, of the receivable from clients balance and ~~$280~~$295 and ~~$279,~~$278, respectively, of the receivable from mutual funds, insurance companies and other balance related to revenue contracts with customers.

The Partnership derived 14% and 15% of its total revenue for the three month periods ended March 29, 2019 and March 30, 2018, respectively, from one mutual fund complex.

The following table shows the Partnership's disaggregated revenue information. See Note 89 for segment information.

	Three Months Ended March 30, 2018						Three Months Ended March 31, 2017							Three Months Ended March 29, 2019						Three Months Ended March 30, 2018
	U.S.		Canada		Total		U.S.		Canada			Total		U.S.		Canada		Total		U.S.		Canada		Total
Revenue
Fee revenue:
Asset-based fee revenue:
Advisory programs fees	$	982	$	13	$	995	$	685	$	9		$	694	$	1,081	$	15	$	1,096	$	982	$	13	$	995
Service fees		305		22		327		298		18			316		292		21		313		305		22		327
Other asset-based fees		131		—		131		105		—	��		105		150		—		150		131		—		131
Total asset-based fee revenue		1,418		35		1,453		1,088		27			1,115		1,523		36		1,559		1,418		35		1,453
Account and activity fee revenue:
Shareholder accounting services fees		109		—		109		105		—			105		107		—		107		109		—		109
Other account and activity fee revenue		59		4		63		64		3			67		62		3		65		59		4		63
Total account and activity fee revenue		168		4		172		169		3			172		169		3		172		168		4		172
Total fee revenue		1,586		39		1,625		1,257		30			1,287		1,692		39		1,731		1,586		39		1,625
Trade revenue:
Commissions		318		14		332		401		14			415		322		11		333		318		14		332
Principal transactions		31		1		32		41		1			42		34		1		35		31		1		32
Total trade revenue		349		15		364		442		15			457		356		12		368		349		15		364
Net interest and dividends revenue		45		2		47		39		1			40
Other revenue		4		2		6		11		2			13
Total revenue from customers															2,048		51		2,099		1,935		54		1,989
Net interest and dividends and other revenue															87		4		91		49		4		53
Net revenue	$	1,984	$	58	$	2,042	$	1,749	$	48		$	1,797	$	2,135	$	55	$	2,190	$	1,984	$	58	$	2,042

The Partnership's valuation methodologies for financial assets and financial liabilities measured at fair value and the fair value hierarchy are described in Part II, Item 8 – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 1 of the Partnership's Annual Report. There have been no material changes to the Partnership's valuation methodologies since December 31, ~~2017.~~2018.

The Partnership did not have any assets or liabilities categorized as Level III during the three and twelve month periods ended March ~~30, 2018~~29, 2019 and December 31, ~~2017,~~2018, respectively. ~~In addition, there were no transfers into or out of Levels I, II or III during these periods.~~

The following tables show the Partnership’s financial assets measured at fair value:

	Financial Assets at Fair Value as of								Financial Assets at Fair Value as of
	March 30, 2018								March 29, 2019
	Level I		Level II		Level III		Total		Level I		Level II		Level III		Total
Cash equivalents:
Certificates of deposit	$	—	$	276	$	—	$	276	$	—	$	298	$	—	$	298

Investments segregated under federal regulations:
U.S. treasuries	$	1,998	$	—	$	—	$	1,998	$	1,493	$	—	$	—	$	1,493

Securities owned:
Investment securities:
Mutual funds⁽¹⁾	$	245	$	—	$	—	$	245	$	264	$	—	$	—	$	264
Government and agency obligations		3		—		—		3		3		—		—		3
Equities		2		—		—		2		2		—		—		2
Corporate bonds and notes		—		1		—		1		—		1		—		1
Total investment securities	$	250	$	1	$	—	$	251	$	269	$	1	$	—	$	270

Inventory securities:
State and municipal obligations	$	—	$	40	$	—	$	40	$	—	$	27	$	—	$	27
Equities		34		—		—		34		22		—		—		22
Corporate bonds and notes										—		3		—		3
Certificates of deposit										—		3		—		3
Mutual funds		7		—		—		7		2		—		—		2
Certificates of deposit		—		13				13
Corporate bonds and notes		—		3		—		3
Total inventory securities	$	41	$	56	$	—	$	97	$	24	$	33	$	—	$	57

	Financial Assets at Fair Value as of								Financial Assets at Fair Value as of
	December 31, 2017								December 31, 2018
	Level I		Level II		Level III		Total		Level I		Level II		Level III		Total
Cash equivalents:
Certificates of deposit	$	—	$	275	$	—	$	275	$	—	$	298	$	—	$	298

Investments segregated under federal regulations:
U.S. treasuries	$	2,399	$	—	$	—	$	2,399	$	998	$	—	$	—	$	998

Securities owned:
Investment securities:
Mutual funds⁽¹⁾	$	252	$	—	$	—	$	252	$	244	$	—	$	—	$	244
Government and agency obligations		3		—		—		3		3		—		—		3
Equities		2		—		—		2		2		—		—		2
Corporate bonds and notes		—		1		—		1		—		1		—		1
Total investment securities	$	257	$	1	$	—	$	258	$	249	$	1	$	—	$	250

Inventory securities:
Equities									$	16	$	—	$	—	$	16
State and municipal obligations	$	—	$	24	$	—	$	24		—		15		—		15
Equities		16		—		—		16
Mutual funds		4		—		—		4		6		—		—		6
Certificates of deposit		—		4		—		4		—		3		—		3
Corporate bonds and notes		—		2		—		2		—		3		—		3
Total inventory securities	$	20	$	30	$	—	$	50	$	22	$	21	$	—	$	43

The Partnership makes loans available to those general partners and, in limited circumstances, subordinated limited partners (in each case, other than members of the Executive Committee, as defined in the Partnership’s ~~Nineteenth~~Twentieth Amended and Restated Agreement of Registered Limited Liability Limited Partnership, dated ~~June~~August 6, ~~2014~~2018 (the “Partnership Agreement”)), who require financing for some or all of their Partnership capital contributions. In limited circumstances a general partner may withdraw from the Partnership and become a subordinated limited partner while he or she still has an outstanding Partnership loan. It is anticipated that, of the future general and subordinated limited partnership capital contributions (in each case, other than for Executive Committee members) requiring financing, the majority will be financed through Partnership loans. Loans made by the Partnership to such partners are generally for a period of one year but are expected to be renewed and bear interest at the interest rate defined in the loan documents. The Partnership recognizes interest income for the interest earned related to these loans. The outstanding amount of Partnership loans is reflected as a reduction to total Partnership capital. As of March ~~30, 2018~~29, 2019 and December 31, ~~2017,~~2018, the outstanding amount of Partnership loans was ~~$381~~$422 and ~~$297,~~$332, respectively. Interest income earned from these loans, which is included in interest and dividends in the Consolidated Statements of Income, was $4$6 and $3$4 for the three month periods ended March 29, 2019 and March 30, 2018, ~~and March 31, 2017,~~ respectively.

The following table shows the roll forward of outstanding Partnership loans for:

	Three Months Ended						Three Months Ended
	March 30,			March 31,			March 29,			March 30,
	2018			2017			2019			2018
Partnership loans outstanding at beginning of period	$	297		$	266		$	332		$	297
Partnership loans issued during the period		168			140			163			168
Repayment of Partnership loans during the period		(84	)		(71	)		(73	)		(84	)
Total Partnership loans outstanding	$	381		$	335		$	422		$	381

The minimum 7.5% annual payment on the face amount of limited partnership capital was $24 and $17 for ~~both~~ the three month periods ended March ~~30, 2018~~29, 2019 and March ~~31, 2017,~~30, 2018, respectively. These amounts are included as a component of interest expense in the Consolidated Statements of Income.

The Partnership filed a Registration Statement on Form S-8 with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") on January 17, 2014, to register $350 of Interests to be issued pursuant to the Partnership's 2014 Employee Limited Partnership Interest Purchase Plan (the "2014 Plan"). The Partnership previously issued approximately $298 of Interests under the 2014 Plan. The remaining $52 of Interests may be issued under the 2014 Plan at the discretion of the Partnership in the future.

~~The Partnership filed a Registration Statement on Form S-8 with the SEC on January~~ 12, 2018, to register $450 of Interests to be issued pursuant to the Partnership's 2018 Employee Limited Partnership Interest Purchase Plan (the "2018 Plan"). The Partnership ~~intends to offer initial~~issued approximately $380 of Interests under the 2018 Plan ~~during the latter part~~on January 2, 2019. The remaining $70 of ~~2018 and the initial offering~~Interests may be issued under the ~~2018~~ Plan ~~is expected to close early~~at the discretion of the Managing Partner in ~~2019.~~

As a result of its activities as a U.S. broker-dealer, Edward Jones is subject to the net capital provisions of Rule 15c3-1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), and capital compliance rules of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) Rule 4110. Under the alternative method permitted by the rules, Edward Jones must maintain minimum net capital equal to the greater of $0.25 or 2% of aggregate debit items arising from client transactions. The net capital rules also provide that Edward Jones’ partnership capital may not be withdrawn if resulting net capital would be less than minimum requirements. Additionally, certain withdrawals require the approval of the SEC and FINRA to the extent they exceed defined levels, even though such withdrawals would not cause net capital to be less than minimum requirements.

The Partnership’s Canada broker-dealer subsidiary is a registered broker-dealer regulated by the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada (“IIROC”). Under the regulations prescribed by IIROC, the Partnership’s Canada broker-dealer subsidiary is required to maintain minimum levels of risk-adjusted capital, which are dependent on the nature of the Partnership’s Canada broker-dealer subsidiary’s assets and operations.

The following table shows the Partnership’s ~~net~~ capital figures for its U.S. and Canada broker-dealer subsidiaries as of:

	March 30,			December 31,			March 29,			December 31,
	2018			2017			2019			2018
U.S.:
Net capital	$	1,040		$	1,107		$	1,372		$	1,280
Net capital in excess of the minimum required	$	982		$	1,049		$	1,315		$	1,221
Net capital as a percentage of aggregate debit items		35.9	%		38.1	%		48.1	%		43.6	%
Net capital after anticipated capital withdrawals, as a percentage of aggregate debit items		19.0	%		21.6	%		28.8	%		28.3	%

Canada:
Regulatory risk-adjusted capital	$	47		$	50		$	35		$	40
Regulatory risk-adjusted capital in excess of the minimum required to be held by IIROC	$	47		$	42		$	24		$	39

~~Net~~U.S. net capital, Canada risk-adjusted capital and the related capital percentages may fluctuate on a daily basis. In addition, Trust Co. was in compliance with its regulatory capital ~~requirements as of March 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017.~~requirements.

In the normal course of its business, the Partnership is involved, from time to time, in various legal and regulatory matters, including arbitrations, class actions, other litigation, and examinations, investigations and proceedings by governmental authorities, self-regulatory organizations and other regulators, which may result in losses. These matters include:

Mutual Fund Share Class Waivers. As previously disclosed, on October 26, 2015, Edward Jones, without admitting or denying the findings, entered into a settlement agreement with FINRA in connection with its investigation of possible violations of the federal securities laws or rules with respect to mutual fund purchases and sales charge waivers for certain retirement plan and charitable organization accounts. On June 12, 2015, the Division of Enforcement of the SEC informed Edward Jones that it is also investigating this matter. The SEC’s review is ongoing. Consistent with its practice, Edward Jones is cooperating fully with the SEC with respect to its investigation.

Retirement Plan Litigation. On August 19, 2016, JFC, Edward Jones and certain other defendants were named in a putative class action lawsuit (McDonald v. Edward D. Jones & Co., L.P., et al.) filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri brought under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, by a participant in the Edward D. Jones & Co. Profit Sharing and 401(k) Plan (the "Retirement Plan"). The lawsuit alleges that the defendants breached their fiduciary duties to Retirement Plan participants and seeks declaratory and equitable relief and monetary damages on behalf of the Retirement Plan. The defendants filed a motion to dismiss the McDonald lawsuit which was granted in part dismissing the claim against JFC, and denied in part as to all other defendants on January 26, 2017.

On November 11, 2016, a substantially similar lawsuit (Schultz, et al. v. Edward D. Jones & Co., L.P., et al.) was filed in the same court. The plaintiffs consolidated the two lawsuits by adding the Schultz plaintiffs to the McDonald case, and the Schultz action was dismissed. The plaintiffs filed their first amended consolidated complaint on April 28, 2017. On December 13, 2018, the court entered a preliminary order approving a class action settlement agreement reached among the parties. Following a fairness hearing held on April 18, 2019, the court entered judgment on April 22, 2019 in which it granted final approval of the settlement, effected a full release of claims by the settlement class in favor of the defendants, and dismissed the consolidated lawsuit with prejudice.

Wage-and-Hour Class Action. On March 13, 2018, JFC and Edward Jones were named as defendants in a purported collective and class action lawsuit (Bland, et. al. v. Edward D. Jones & Co., L.P, et. al.) filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois by four former financial advisors. The lawsuit was brought under the Fair Labor Standards Act as well as Missouri and Illinois law and alleges that the defendants unlawfully attempted torecoup training costs from departing financial advisors and failed to pay all overtime owed to financial advisor trainees among other claims. The lawsuit seeks declaratory and injunctive relief, compensatory and liquidated damages. JFC and Edward Jones deny the allegations and intend to vigorously defend against the allegations in this lawsuit. On March 19, 2019, the court entered an order granting the defendants' motion to dismiss all claims, but permitting the plaintiffs to amend and re-file certain of their claims.

Securities Class Action. On March 30, 2018, Edward Jones and its affiliated entities and individuals were named as defendants in a putative class action (Anderson, et. al. v. Edward D. Jones & Co., L.P., et. al.) filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California. The lawsuit was brought under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), and the Exchange Act, as well as Missouri and California law and alleges that the defendants inappropriately transitioned clients from commission-based accounts to fee-based programs. The plaintiffs have requested declaratory, equitable, and exemplary relief, and compensatory damages. Edward Jones and its affiliated entities and individuals deny the allegations and intend to vigorously defend this lawsuit.

Discrimination Class Action. On May 24, 2018, Edward Jones and JFC were named as defendants in a putative class action lawsuit (Bland v. Edward D. Jones & Co., L.P., et al.) filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois by a former financial advisor. An amended complaint was filed on September 24, 2018, under 42 U.S.C. § 1981, alleging that the defendants discriminated against the former financial advisor and financial advisor trainees on the basis of race. On November 26, 2018, the plaintiffs filed a second amended complaint adding an allegation of discrimination of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The lawsuit seeks equitable and injunctive relief, as well as compensatory and punitive damages. Edward Jones and JFC deny the allegations and intend to vigorously defend this lawsuit.

In addition to these matters, the Partnership provides for potential losses that may arise related to other contingencies.

The Partnership assesses its liabilities and contingencies utilizing available information. The Partnership accrues for potential losses for those matters where it is probable that the Partnership will incur a potential loss to the extent that the amount of such potential loss can be reasonably estimated, in accordance with FASB ~~ASC~~Accounting Standards Codification No. 450, Contingencies. This liability represents the Partnership’s estimate of the probable loss at March ~~30, 2018,~~29, 2019, after considering, among other factors, the progress of each case, the Partnership's experience with other legal and regulatory matters and discussion with legal counsel, and is believed to be sufficient. The aggregate accrued liability may be adjusted from time to time to reflect any relevant developments.

For such matters where an accrued liability has not been established and the Partnership believes a loss is both reasonably possible and estimable, as well as for matters where an accrued liability has been recorded but for which an exposure to loss in excess of the amount accrued is both reasonably possible and estimable, the current estimated aggregated range of additional possible loss is $0up to $9$32 as of March ~~30, 2018.~~29, 2019. This range of reasonably possible loss does not necessarily represent the Partnership's maximum loss exposure as the Partnership was not able to estimate a range of reasonably possible loss for all matters.

Further, the matters underlying any disclosed estimated range will change from time to time, and actual results may vary significantly. While the outcome of these matters is inherently uncertain, based on information currently available, the Partnership believes that its established liabilities at March ~~30, 2018~~29, 2019 are adequate, and the liabilities arising from such matters will not have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the Partnership. However, based on future developments and the potential unfavorable resolution of these matters, the outcome could be material to the Partnership’s future consolidated operating results for a particular period or periods.

The Partnership has determined it has two operating and reportable segments based upon geographic location, the U.S. and Canada. Canada segment information, as reported in the following table, is based upon the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Partnership's Canada operations, which primarily occur through a non-guaranteed subsidiary of the Partnership. The U.S. segment information is derived from the Consolidated Financial Statements less the Canada segment information as presented. Pre-variable income represents income before variable compensation expense and before allocations to partners. This is consistent with how management views the segments in order to assess performance.

The following table shows financial information for the Partnership’s reportable segments:

	Three Months Ended						Three Months Ended
	March 30, 2018			March 31, 2017			March 29, 2019			March 30, 2018
Net revenue:
U.S.	$	1,984		$	1,749		$	2,135		$	1,984
Canada		58			48			55			58
Total net revenue	$	2,042		$	1,797		$	2,190		$	2,042

Pre-variable income (loss):
U.S.	$	466		$	362		$	488		$	466
Canada		3			(1	)		(1	)		3
Total pre-variable income		469			361			487			469

Variable compensation:
U.S.		230			160			240			230
Canada		6			4			6			6
Total variable compensation		236			164			246			236

Income (loss) before allocations to partners:
U.S.		236			202			248			236
Canada		(3	)		(5	)		(7	)		(3	)
Total income before allocations to partners	$	233		$	197		$	241		$	233

The Partnership derived 15% and 18% of its total revenue for the three month periods ended March 30, 2018 and March 31, 2017, respectively, from one mutual fund complex. The revenue generated from this company relates to business conducted with the Partnership’s U.S. segment. Significant reductions in this revenue due to regulatory reform or other changes to the Partnership’s relationship with this mutual fund complex could have a material impact on the Partnership’s results of operations.

The Partnership does not offset financial instruments in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition. However, the Partnership enters into master netting arrangements with counterparties for securities purchased under agreements to resell that are subject to net settlement in the event of default. These agreements create a right of offset for the amounts due to and due from the same counterparty in the event of default or bankruptcy.

The following table shows the Partnership's securities purchased under agreements to resell as of:

The following table reconciles certain line items on the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition to the cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash balance on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows as of:

	March 30, 2018		December 31, 2017		March 31, 2017		December 31, 2016		March 29, 2019		March 30, 2018
Cash and cash equivalents	$	1,017	$	846	$	1,026	$	1,047	$	1,370	$	1,017
Cash and investments segregated under federal regulations		9,069		10,099		12,516		12,680		7,052		9,069
Less: Investments segregated under federal regulations		2,006		2,408		4,146		4,155		1,493		2,006
Total cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash	$	8,080	$	8,537	$	9,396	$	9,572	$	6,929	$	8,080

Restricted cash represents cash segregated in special reserve bank accounts for the benefit of U.S. clients pursuant to the Customer Protection Rule 15c3-3 under the Exchange Act.

The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis is intended to help the reader understand the results of operations and the financial condition of the Partnership. Management’s Discussion and Analysis should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying notes included in Part I, Item 1 – Financial Statements of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and Part II, Item 8 – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of the Partnership’s Annual Report. All amounts are presented in millions, except as otherwise noted.

The Partnership broadly categorizes its net revenues into four categories: fee revenue, trade revenue, ~~(revenue from clients' buy or sell transactions of securities),~~ net interest and dividends revenue (net of interest expense) and other revenue. In the Partnership’s Consolidated Statements of Income, fee revenue is composed of asset-based fees and account and activity fees. Asset-based fees are generally a percentage of the total value of specific assets in client accounts. These fees are impacted by client dollars invested in and divested from the accounts which generate asset-based fees and changes in market values of the assets. Account and activity fees and other revenue are impacted by the number of client accounts and the variety of services provided to those accounts, among other factors. Trade revenue is composed of commissions and principal transactions revenue. Commissions are earned from the purchase or sale of mutual fund shares and equities, as well as the purchase of insurance products. Principal transactions revenue primarily results from the Partnership's distribution of, and ~~insurance products,~~participation in, principal trading activities in municipal obligations, certificates of deposit, and ~~principal transactions.~~over-the-counter corporate obligations. Trade revenue is impacted by the number of financial advisors, trading volume (client dollars invested), mix of the products in which clients invest, size of trades, margins earned on the transactions and market volatility. Net interest and dividends revenue is impacted by the amount of cash and investments, receivables from and payables to clients, the variability of interest rates earned and paid on such balances, the number of Interests outstanding, and the balances of Partnership loans.

The following table sets forth the changes in major categories of the Consolidated Statements of Income as well as several related key metrics for the three month periods ended March ~~30, 2018~~29, 2019 and March ~~31, 2017.~~30, 2018. Management of the Partnership relies on this financial information and the related metrics to evaluate the Partnership’s operating performance and financial condition.

	Three Months Ended									Three Months Ended
	March 30,			March 31,			%			March 29,			March 30,			%
	2018			2017			Change			2019			2018			Change
Revenue:
Fee revenue:
Asset-based	$	1,453		$	1,115			30	%	$	1,559		$	1,453			7	%
Account and activity		172			172			0	%		172			172			0	%
Total fee revenue		1,625			1,287			26	%		1,731			1,625			7	%
% of net revenue		80	%		72	%					79	%		80	%
Trade revenue		364			457			-20	%		368			364			1	%
% of net revenue		18	%		25	%					17	%		18	%
Net interest and dividends		47			40			18	%		63			47			34	%
Other revenue		6			13			-54	%		28			6			367	%
Net revenue		2,042			1,797			14	%		2,190			2,042			7	%
Operating expenses		1,809			1,600			13	%		1,949			1,809			8	%
Income before allocations to partners	$	233		$	197			18	%	$	241		$	233			3	%

Related metrics:
Client dollars invested⁽¹⁾:
Trade ($ billions)	$	25		$	24			4	%	$	30		$	25			20	%
Advisory programs ($ billions)	$	16		$	22			-27	%	$	6		$	16			-63	%
Client households at period end		5.2			5.3			-2	%		5.4			5.2			4	%
Net new assets for the period ($ billions)⁽²⁾	$	14		$	13			8	%	$	16		$	14			14	%
Client assets under care:
Total:
At period end ($ billions)	$	1,116		$	1,008			11	%	$	1,208		$	1,116			8	%
Average ($ billions)	$	1,135		$	989			15	%	$	1,163		$	1,135			2	%
Advisory programs:
At period end ($ billions)	$	329		$	238			38	%	$	370		$	329			12	%
Average ($ billions)	$	327		$	225			45	%	$	357		$	327			9	%
Financial advisors (actual):
At period end		16,398			15,093			9	%		17,894			16,398			9	%
Average		16,235			14,996			8	%		17,763			16,235			9	%
Attrition % (annualized)		7.3	%		8.1	%	n/a
Attrition %⁽³⁾											9.6	%		7.3	%	n/a
Dow Jones Industrial Average (actual):
At period end		24,103			20,663			17	%		25,929			24,103			8	%
Average for period		25,127			20,395			23	%		25,118			25,127			0	%
S&P 500 Index (actual):
At period end		2,641			2,363			12	%		2,834			2,641			7	%
Average for period		2,733			2,325			18	%		2,718			2,733			-1	%

The Partnership ended the first quarter of ~~2018~~2019 with ~~16,398~~a record 17,894 financial advisors and ~~$1.1~~$1.2 trillion in client assets under care, increases of 9% and ~~11%~~8%, respectively, compared to the end of the first quarter of ~~2017.~~

~~Financial advisors gathered $14 billion in net~~2018. Net new assets were $16 billion during the first quarter of ~~2018~~2019 compared to ~~$13~~$14 billion in the first quarter of ~~2017.~~2018. Average client assets under care increased ~~15% for~~2% during the first quarter of ~~2018~~2019 compared to the same period in ~~2017,~~2018, due to increases in the market value of client assets and net new assets gathered during the ~~past twelve months.~~ year.

Advisory programs' average assets under care increased ~~45%~~9% in the first quarter of ~~2018~~2019 to ~~$327~~$357 billion due to the continued, though lower, investment of client assets into advisory ~~programs as a result~~programs. Market increases in 2019 have nearly offset the impact of ~~increased~~market declines on client ~~adoption~~asset values experienced toward the end of ~~the features, benefits and value proposition of advisory programs and strong market performance during calendar year 2017.~~ 2018.

Net revenue increased ~~14%~~7% to ~~$2,042~~$2,190 for the first quarter of ~~2018~~2019 compared to the same period in ~~2017.~~2018. Results reflected a ~~30%~~7% increase in asset-based fee revenue primarily due to the ~~continued investment~~cumulative impact of ~~client assets in~~net asset inflows into advisory programs in both 2018 and 2019, as well as the market increases throughout much of the first quarter of 2019. The increase in net revenue also reflected 1% growth in trade revenue due to increased client dollars invested in the ~~market value of the underlying client assets held. This increase was~~current quarter, partially offset by a ~~20%~~ decrease in trade revenue, primarily due to lower margins earned as a result of a change in product mix with a higher proportion of client dollars invested in fixed income products which earn lower margins, as well as lower client dollars invested in mutual funds in transaction-based accounts. margin earned.

Operating expenses increased ~~13%~~8% to ~~$1,809~~$1,949 in the first quarter of ~~2018~~2019 compared to ~~2017,~~2018, primarily due to ~~increases~~an increase in ~~financial advisor~~ compensation and ~~variable compensation.~~benefits expense. Financial advisor compensation increased largely due to ~~higher~~an increase in revenues on which commissions are earned, an increase in the number of financial advisors and ~~changes~~an increase in compensation ~~programs which were effective April 2017, partially offset by certain temporary enhancements~~related to supporting new financial advisors and trainees. Home office and branch compensation increased due to an increase in the number of personnel to support increased client activity, the growth of the Partnership’s financial advisor ~~compensation which increased compensation expense in the first quarter of 2017.~~network and higher wages.

Overall, the increase in net revenue, offset by the increase in operating expenses, generated income before allocations to partners of ~~$233, an 18%~~$241, a 3% increase from the first quarter of ~~2017.~~2018.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTH PERIODS ENDED MARCH ~~30, 2018~~29, 2019 AND MARCH ~~31, 2017~~30, 2018

The discussion below details the significant fluctuations and drivers for the major categories of the Partnership’s Consolidated Statements of Income.

Fee revenue, which consists of asset-based fees and account and activity fees, increased ~~26%~~7% to ~~$1,625~~$1,731 in the first quarter of ~~2018~~2019, compared to the same period in ~~2017.~~2018. A discussion of fee revenue components follows.

	Three Months Ended							Three Months Ended
	March 30,		March 31,		%			March 29,		March 30,		%
	2018		2017		Change			2019		2018		Change
Fee revenue:
Asset-based fee revenue:
Advisory programs fees	$	995	$	694		43	%	$	1,096	$	995		10	%
Service fees		327		316		3	%		313		327		-4	%
Other asset-based fees		131		105		25	%		150		131		15	%
Total asset-based fee revenue		1,453		1,115		30	%		1,559		1,453		7	%
Account and activity fee revenue:
Shareholder accounting services fees		109		105		4	%		107		109		-2	%
Other account and activity fee revenue		63		67		-6	%		65		63		3	%
Total account and activity fee revenue		172		172		0	%		172		172		0	%
Total fee revenue	$	1,625	$	1,287		26	%	$	1,731	$	1,625		7	%
			��
Related metrics:
Average U.S. client asset values ($ billions)⁽¹⁾:
Mutual fund assets held outside of advisory programs	$	423.3	$	399.1		6	%	$	408.0	$	423.3		-4	%
Advisory programs	$	322.4	$	221.9		45	%	$	351.5	$	322.4		9	%
Insurance	$	85.4	$	78.0		9	%	$	81.9	$	85.4		-4	%
Cash solutions	$	26.1	$	24.5		7	%	$	32.9	$	26.1		26	%

Shareholder accounting holdings serviced	27.3		26.1			5	%		28.5	27.3			4	%

~~Asset-based~~Overall asset-based fee revenue increased ~~30%~~7% to ~~$1,453~~$1,559 in the first quarter of ~~2018~~2019 compared to the same period in ~~2017~~2018, primarily due to a 10% increase in revenue from advisory programs fees, slightly offset by a decrease in service fees earned on mutual fund assets in non-advisory accounts.

Growth in advisory programs fees was due to the continued, though lower, investment of client assets in advisory programs. Market increases in 2019 have nearly offset the impact of market declines on client asset values experienced toward the end of 2018. The increase in other asset-based fee revenue in 2019 reflected growth in fund adviser fees due to an increase in advisory programs fees. Growth in advisory programs fees reflected the cumulative impact of strong levels of net inflows over the last twelve months into advisory programs, as a result of increased client adoption of the features, benefits and value proposition of advisory programs, and increasesassets held in the ~~underlying clients' assets held due to~~mutual funds comprising the ~~strong market performance during calendar year 2017.~~

~~Account and activity~~BB Trust. However, this fund adviser fee revenue was ~~flat at $172 in the first quarter of 2018 compared~~completely offset by fees paid to the ~~same period~~sub-advisers of the funds comprising the BB Trust.

The decrease in ~~2017, primarily~~service fees earned on non-advisory accounts was due to a ~~slight increase in shareholder accounting services fees, offset by a~~ decrease in ~~other account and activity fee revenue related to retirement~~mutual fund assets on which those service fees ~~due to the increased client adoption of advisory programs.~~

Trade revenue, which consists of commissions and principal transactions, ~~decreased 20%~~increased 1% to ~~$364~~$368 in the first quarter of ~~2018~~2019 compared to the same period in ~~2017.~~2018. A discussion of trade revenue components follows.

	Three Months Ended							Three Months Ended
	March 30,		March 31,		%			March 29,		March 30,		%
	2018		2017		Change			2019		2018		Change
Trade revenue:
Commissions revenue:
Mutual funds	$	136	$	215		-37	%	$	145	$	136		7	%
Equities		132		136		-3	%		118		132		-11	%
Insurance products		64		64		0	%
Insurance products and other									70		64		9	%
Total commissions revenue	$	332	$	415		-20	%	$	333	$	332		0	%
Principal transactions		32		42		-24	%		35		32		9	%
Total trade revenue	$	364	$	457		-20	%	$	368	$	364		1	%

Related metrics:
Client dollars invested ($ billions)	$	25.2	$	24.5		3	%
Mutual funds								$	7	$	7		0	%
Equities									7		8		-13	%
Insurance products and other									2		1		100	%
Principal transactions									14		9		56	%
Total client dollars invested ($ billions)								$	30	$	25		20	%

Margin per $1,000 invested	$	14.5	$	18.7		-22	%	$	12.2	$	14.5		-16	%
U.S. business days		61		62		-2	%		61		61		0	%

The ~~decrease~~increase in trade revenue ~~in the first quarter of 2018 compared to the same period in 2017~~for 2019 was primarily due to ~~lower margins~~an increase in client dollars invested, reflecting increases in the number of client transactions and financial advisors, partially offset by a decrease in margin earned. The decrease in margin earned ~~as a~~is the result of athe change in product mix with a higher proportion of client dollars invested in ~~principal transactions, or~~certain fixed income products that are traded in a principal transaction capacity, which earn lower margins, as well as lower client dollars invested in mutual funds. Further, the margin earned for mutual funds decreased as additional breakpoints were earned by clients due to larger average mutual fund holdings, which resulted in lower commissions. In addition, due to a reduction in the number of unit investment trust products offered by the Partnership, principal transactions revenue was negatively impacted in the first quarter of 2018.margins.

Net interest and dividends revenue increased ~~18%~~34% to ~~$47 in~~$63 during the first quarter of ~~2018~~2019 compared to the same period in ~~2017. Results reflected~~2018. Increases in the federal funds rate resulted in an increase in short-term investing interest ~~income due to an~~revenue. This increase ~~in the weighted average rate earned due to increases in the federal funds rate, partially~~was slightly offset by an increase in limited partnership capital interest expense ~~paid on client credit balances due to~~for the ~~increase in rates.~~

	Three Months Ended							Three Months Ended
	March 30,		March 31,		%			March 29,		March 30,		%
	2018		2017		Change			2019		2018		Change
Operating expenses:
Compensation and benefits:
Financial advisor	$	866	$	785		10	%	$	917	$	866		6	%
Home office and branch		352		328		7	%		373		352		6	%
Variable compensation		236		164		44	%		246		236		4	%
Total compensation and benefits		1,454		1,277		14	%		1,536		1,454		6	%

Occupancy and equipment		109		102		7	%		119		109		9	%
Communications and data processing		80		81		-1	%		86		80		8	%
Fund sub-adviser fees		30		20		50	%		36		30		20	%
Advertising		25		23		9	%		24		25		-4	%
Professional and consulting fees		18		17		6	%		23		18		28	%
Postage and shipping		14		15		-7	%		15		14		7	%
Other operating expenses		79		65		22	%		110		79		39	%
Total operating expenses	$	1,809	$	1,600		13	%	$	1,949	$	1,809		8	%

Related metrics (actual):
Number of branches:
At period end		13,640		13,049		5	%		14,419		13,640		6	%
Average		13,542		12,987		4	%		14,289		13,542		6	%
Financial advisors:
At period end		16,398		15,093		9	%		17,894		16,398		9	%
Average		16,235		14,996		8	%		17,763		16,235		9	%
Branch office administrators⁽¹⁾:
At period end		15,619		15,059		4	%		16,441		15,619		5	%
Average		15,477		14,954		3	%		16,281		15,477		5	%
Home office associates^(1):
At period end		6,689		6,505		3	%		6,876		6,689		3	%
Average		6,625		6,406		3	%		6,872		6,625		4	%
Home office associates⁽¹⁾ per 100 financial advisors (average)		40.8		42.7		-4	%		38.7		40.8		-5	%
Branch office administrators⁽¹⁾ per 100 financial advisors (average)		95.3		99.7		-4	%		91.7		95.3		-4	%
Average operating expenses per financial advisor⁽²⁾	$	41,700	$	42,078		-1	%	$	42,223	$	41,700		1	%

For the first quarter of ~~2018,~~2019, operating expenses increased ~~13%~~8% to ~~$1,809~~$1,949 compared to the first quarter of ~~2017,~~2018, primarily due to ~~a $177~~an $82 increase in compensation and benefits expense (described below). and a $31 increase in other operating expenses. Other operating expenses increased due to various items, including expenses related to travel, recruiting, legal and branch business expenses.

Financial advisor compensation and benefits expense increased ~~10%~~6% in the first quarter of ~~2018~~2019 due to an increase in revenues on which commissions are earned, ~~an increase~~growth in the number of financial advisors and ~~changes~~an increase in compensation ~~programs which were effective April 2017. This increase was partially offset by certain temporary enhancements~~related to supporting new financial advisor compensation which increased compensation expense in the first quarter of 2017. These enhancements were implemented by the Partnership to support financial advisors' efforts through the implementation of the Department of Labor's ("DOL") fiduciary ruleadvisors and ~~ended in April 2017.~~trainees.

Home office and branch compensation and benefits expense increased 7%6% in the first quarter of ~~2018~~2019 primarily due to an increase in the number of personnel to support increased client activity and the growth of the Partnership’s financial advisor network ~~as well as~~and higher ~~wages and healthcare costs.~~wages. The average number of the Partnership’s home office associates and branch office administrators ("BOAs") ~~both~~ increased ~~3%.~~

~~The Partnership uses the ratios of both the number of home office associates~~4% and the number of BOAs per 100 financial advisors, as well as the average operating expense per financial advisor, as key metrics in managing its costs. In the first quarter of 2018, the average number of home office associates and BOAs per 100 financial advisors both decreased 4%. The average operating expenses per financial advisor decreased 1% primarily due to the impact of spreading costs over more financial advisors, partially offset by an increase in home office and branch compensation and benefits expense. The Partnership’s longer term strategy is to continue to grow its financial advisor network at a faster pace than its home office and branch support staff. The Partnership expects to slow the growth in the number of personnel, thereby further reducing the average operating expense per financial advisor, over the next few years.5%, respectively.

Variable compensation expands and contracts in relation to the Partnership’s related profitability and margin earned. A significant portion of the Partnership’s profits is allocated to variable compensation and paid to associates in the form of bonuses and profit sharing. Variable compensation increased ~~44%~~4% in the first quarter of ~~2018~~2019 to ~~$236~~$246 due to an increase in the Partnership's profitability, including an increase in the number of profitable branches and an overall increase in branch profitability.

The Partnership uses the ratios of both the number of home office associates and the number of BOAs per 100 financial advisors, as well as average operating expenses per financial advisor (excluding financial advisor compensation, variable compensation and fund sub-adviser fees), as key metrics in managing its costs. In the first quarter of 2019, the average number of home office associates and BOAs per 100 financial advisors decreased 5% and 4%, respectively. The average operating expenses per financial advisor increased 1% due to the increase in the number of personnel as well as the increases in home office and branch compensation and benefits and other operating expenses described above, partially offset by the impact of spreading those expenses over more financial advisors. The Partnership’s longer term strategy is to continue to grow its financial advisor network at a faster pace than its home office staff. The Partnership expects branch expenses to increase in the near term as new financial advisors obtain branch offices and incur additional expenses.

The Partnership has two operating and reportable segments based upon geographic location, the U.S. and Canada. Canada segment information, as reported in the following table, is based upon the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Partnership’s Canada operations. The U.S. segment information is derived from the Consolidated Financial Statements less the Canada segment information as presented. Pre-variable income represents income before variable compensation expense and before allocations to partners. This is consistent with how management views the segments in order to assess performance.

The following table shows financial information for the Partnership’s reportable segments.

	Three Months Ended									Three Months Ended
	March 30,			March 31,			%			March 29,			March 30,			%
	2018			2017			Change			2019			2018			Change
Net revenue:
U.S.	$	1,984		$	1,749			13	%	$	2,135		$	1,984			8	%
Canada		58			48			21	%		55			58			-5	%
Total net revenue		2,042			1,797			14	%		2,190			2,042			7	%

Operating expenses (excluding variable compensation):
U.S.		1,518			1,387			9	%		1,647			1,518			8	%
Canada		55			49			12	%		56			55			2	%
Total operating expenses		1,573			1,436			10	%		1,703			1,573			8	%

Pre-variable income (loss):
U.S.		466			362			29	%		488			466			5	%
Canada		3			(1	)		400	%		(1	)		3			-133	%
Total pre-variable income		469			361			30	%		487			469			4	%

Variable compensation:
U.S.		230			160			44	%		240			230			4	%
Canada		6			4			50	%		6			6			0	%
Total variable compensation		236			164			44	%		246			236			4	%

Income (loss) before allocations to partners:
U.S.		236			202			17	%		248			236			5	%
Canada		(3	)		(5	)		40	%		(7	)		(3	)		-133	%
Total income before allocations to partners	$	233		$	197			18	%	$	241		$	233			3	%

Client assets under care ($ billions):
U.S.
At period end	$	1,091.9		$	986.5			11	%	$	1,182.9		$	1,091.9			8	%
Average	$	1,110.8		$	967.7			15	%	$	1,138.8		$	1,110.8			3	%
Canada
At period end	$	23.8		$	21.2			12	%	$	25.2		$	23.8			6	%
Average	$	24.4		$	20.8			17	%	$	24.3		$	24.4			0	%

Net new assets for the period ($ billions):
U.S.	$	13.5		$	12.8			5	%	$	15.2		$	13.5			13	%
Canada	$	0.6		$	0.5			20	%	$	0.4		$	0.6			-33	%

Financial advisors (actual):
U.S.
At period end		15,627			14,432			8	%		17,059			15,627			9	%
Average		15,483			14,334			8	%		16,939			15,483			9	%
Canada
At period end		771			661			17	%		835			771			8	%
Average		752			662			14	%		824			752			10	%

For the first quarter of ~~2018,~~2019, net revenue increased ~~13% ($235)~~8% to ~~$1,984 compared to the first quarter of 2017. The increase in net revenue was~~$2,135, primarily due to an increase in asset-based fee ~~revenue, partially offset by a decrease in trade~~ revenue. Asset-based fee revenue increased ~~30% ($330),~~7% to $1,523, led by an increase in advisory programs ~~fees. Growth in advisory programs~~ fees ~~reflected~~largely due to the cumulative impact of ~~strong levels of~~ net asset inflows ~~over the last twelve months~~ into advisory programs, as ~~a result of increased client adoption~~well as the market increases throughout much of the features, benefits and value proposition advisory programs, and increases in the market value of the underlying client assets held. Trade revenue decreased 21% ($93) primarily due to lower margins earned as a result of a change in product mix with a higher proportion of client dollars invested in fixed income products which earn lower margins, as well as lower client dollars invested in mutual funds in transaction-based accounts.period.

Operating expenses (excluding variable compensation) increased ~~9% ($131)~~8% to $1,647 in the first quarter of ~~2018~~2019 primarily due to ~~increases~~an increase in compensation and benefits for financial ~~advisor compensation~~advisors and home office and branch ~~compensation and benefits.~~associates. Financial advisor compensation and benefits expense increased ~~largely~~primarily due to ~~higher~~an increase in revenues on which commissions ~~an increase~~are earned, growth in the number of financial advisors and ~~changes~~an increase in compensation ~~programs which were effective April 2017, partially offset by certain temporary enhancements~~related to supporting new financial ~~advisor compensation which increased compensation expense in the first quarter of 2017.~~advisors and trainees. Home office and branch compensation and benefits expense increased primarily due to an increase in the number of personnel to support increased client activity, the growth of the Partnership’s financial advisor network ~~as well as~~and higher ~~wages and healthcare costs.~~wages.

For the first quarter of ~~2018,~~2019, net revenue ~~increased 21% ($10)~~decreased 5% to ~~$58~~$55 compared to the ~~first quarter of 2017.~~same period in 2018. The ~~increase~~decrease in net revenue was primarily due to ~~an increase~~a decrease in ~~asset-based fee~~trade revenue as a result of ~~30% ($8), due to increased investment~~lower margins earned reflecting the change in product mix with a higher proportion of client ~~assets into advisory programs, and higher service fees.~~ dollars invested in fixed income products which earn lower margins.

Operating expenses (excluding variable compensation) increased ~~12% ($6) in the first quarter of 2018 compared~~2% to ~~the first quarter of 2017~~$56 due to an increase in financial advisor compensation attributable to ~~an increase in revenues on which financial advisor commissions are earned and an increase~~growth in the number of financial ~~advisors.~~advisors and an increase in compensation related to supporting new financial advisors and trainees.

The Partnership remains focused on achieving profitability in Canada. This includes several long-term areas of focus which include a plan to grow the number of financial advisors, client assets under care and the depth of financial solutions provided to clients.

As discussed more fully in Part I, Item 1A – Risk Factors – Risk Related to the Partnership's Business – Legislative and Regulatory Initiatives of the Partnership’s Annual Report, which is supplemented by Part II, Item 1A – Risk Factors – Legislative and Regulatory Initiatives of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 29, 2019, the Partnership continues to monitor several ~~regulatory initiatives and~~ proposed, potential and recently enacted federal and state legislation, rules and regulations ("Legislative and Regulatory Initiatives"), including the possibility of a universal fiduciary standard of care applicable to both broker-dealers and investment advisers under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act ("Dodd-Frank Act")~~, the DOL fiduciary rule~~ and the potential for new legislation and regulation.

There is a high degree of uncertainty surrounding Legislative and Regulatory Initiatives. Current Legislative and Regulatory Initiatives have resulted in an increasingly complex environment in which the Partnership conducts its business. As such, the Partnership cannot reliably predict when or if any of the proposed or potential Legislative and Regulatory Initiatives will be enacted, when or if any enacted Legislative and Regulatory Initiatives will be implemented, whether there will be any changes to enacted or proposed Legislative and Regulatory Initiatives or the impact that any Legislative and Regulatory Initiatives will have on the Partnership.

~~DOL Fiduciary Rule. The DOL issued its final rule defining the term "fiduciary" and exemptions related thereto in the context of the~~ ~~Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended ("~~ERISA"), and retirement accounts in April 2016. Certain provisions of the rule, including the impartial conduct standards, became applicable on June 9, 2017, with the remaining provisions scheduled to become applicable on July 1, 2019. On March 15, 2018, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals issued an opinion vacating the DOL fiduciary rule and related exemptions. While the court ruling became final on May 8, 2018, the procedural time frame for appeal has not yet been exhausted. In addition, the DOL recently stated that it will not pursue prohibited transaction claims against those working diligently and in good faith to comply with the impartial conduct standards for transactions that would have been exempted under the prior fiduciary rule, but it is unclear whether the DOL will issue any new permanent exemptions going forward.

The Partnership dedicated significant resources to interpret and implement the rule, including its personnel, information systems resources and financial resources. Implementation of the rule required changes in the manner in which the Partnership serves clients with retirement accounts, which represents a substantial portion of the Partnership's business. As a result, the Partnership's solutions available to retirement accounts include fee-based solutions, such as its advisory programs, and certain transaction-based solutions. The Partnership continues to evaluate the solutions available to retirement accounts, with additional changes possible. The overall impact of the rule may ultimately be adverse to the Partnership's financial condition, results of operations and liquidity.

SEC Standards of Conduct for Investment Professionals Rulemaking Package (the "Proposal"). ~~The~~On April 18, 2018, the SEC released its Proposal to address the standard of care for broker-dealers and investment advisers ~~on April 18, 2018.~~as required by the Dodd-Frank Act. The Proposal sets forth two distinct standards of care: a Regulation Best Interest applicable to broker-dealers and brokerage clients, and the Proposed Standard of Conduct for Investment Advisers ~~[clarifying]~~clarifying a "fiduciary" standard applicable to investment advisers and advisory clients. The Proposal also includes a new disclosure, the Client Relationship Summary. ~~A 90-day comment period began upon official publication of~~The Partnership continues to dedicate significant resources to interpret the Proposal. The Partnership is in the process of evaluating how the Proposal may impact the changes the Partnership made in response to the DOL fiduciary rule, how the two agencies' rules, guidance, and disclosures interface, and how and when it will provide feedback to the SEC's Proposal. However, the final

enactment and implementation of the Proposal may have a materially adverse effect on the Partnership's financial condition, results of operations and liquidity.

Other Standard of Care Initiatives. In addition, state legislators and other regulators ~~and other licensing entities~~ are proposing, or have adopted, laws and rules to articulate their required standard of care. The Partnership is dedicating significant resources to interpret and address these laws and rules as well. The Partnership cannot reliably predict the ultimate form or impact of such rules and laws, but their enactment and implementation may have an adverse effect on the Partnership's financial condition, results of operations, and liquidity.

The Partnership estimates approximately 70% ~~and 75%~~ of its total revenue was derived from sales and services related to mutual fund and insurance products for the three month periods ended March ~~30, 2018~~29, 2019 and March ~~31, 2017, respectively.~~30, 2018. In addition, the Partnership derived ~~15%~~14% and ~~18%~~15% of its total revenue from one mutual fund complex for the three month periods ended March 29, 2019 and March 30, 2018, ~~and March 31, 2017, respectively, from one mutual fund complex.~~respectively. The revenue generated from this company relates to business conducted with the Partnership’s U.S. segment.

Significant reductions in these revenues due to regulatory reform or other changes to the Partnership’s relationship with mutual fund or insurance companies could have a material adverse effect on the Partnership’s results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity.

The Partnership requires liquidity to cover its operating expenses, net capital requirements, capital expenditures, distributions to partners and redemptions of Partnership interests. The principal sources for meeting the Partnership’s liquidity requirements include existing liquidity and capital resources of the Partnership, discussed further below, and funds generated from operations. The Partnership believes that the liquidity provided by these sources will be sufficient to meet its capital and liquidity requirements for the next twelve months. Depending on conditions in the capital markets and other factors, the Partnership will, from time to time, consider the issuance of debt and additional Partnership capital, the proceeds of which could be used to meet growth needs or for other purposes.

The Partnership’s growth in capital has historically been the result of the sale of Interests to its associates and existing limited partners, the sale of subordinated limited partnership interests to its current or retiring general partners, and retention of general partner earnings.

The Partnership filed a Registration Statement on Form S-8 with the SEC on January 17, 2014, to register $350 of Interests to be issued pursuant to the 2014 Plan. The Partnership previously issued approximately $298 of Interests under the 2014 Plan. The remaining $52 of Interests may be issued under the 2014 Plan at the discretion of the Partnership in the future. Proceeds from the Interests issued under the 2014 Plan have been used for working capital and general firm purposes and to ensure there is adequate general liquidity of the Partnership for future needs, including growing the number of financial advisors. The Partnership filed a Registration Statement on Form S-8 with the SEC on January 12, 2018, to register $450 of Interests to be issued pursuant to the 2018 Plan. The Partnership ~~intends to offer initial~~issued approximately $380 of Interests under the 2018 Plan ~~during the latter part~~on January 2, 2019. The remaining $70 of ~~2018 and the initial offering~~Interests may be issued under the 2018 Plan ~~is expected to close early~~at the discretion of the Managing Partner in ~~2019.~~the future. Proceeds from the offering under the 2018 Plan are expected to be used for working capital and general firm purposes and to ensure there is adequate general liquidity of the Partnership for future needs. The issuance of Interests reduces the Partnership’s net interest income and profitability.

The Partnership’s capital subject to mandatory redemption at March ~~30, 2018,~~29, 2019, net of reserve for anticipated withdrawals, was ~~$2,512,~~$2,963, an increase of $7$456 from December 31, ~~2017.~~2018. This increase in Partnership capital subject to mandatory redemption was primarily due to the retention of general partner earnings ($~~25)~~24) and additional capital contributions related to limited partner, subordinated limited partner and general partner interests ($4,380, $51 and ~~$170,~~$162, respectively), partially offset by the net increase in Partnership loans outstanding ($~~84)~~90) and redemption of limited partner, subordinated limited partner and general partner interests ($~~2, $6~~3, $31 and ~~$151,~~$37, respectively). During both the three month periods ended March ~~30, 2018~~29, 2019 and March ~~31, 2017,~~30, 2018, the Partnership retained 13.8% of income allocated to general partners.

Under the terms of the Partnership Agreement, a partner’s capital is required to be redeemed by the Partnership in the event of the partner’s death or withdrawal from the Partnership, subject to compliance with ongoing regulatory capital requirements. In the event of a partner’s death, the Partnership generally redeems the partner’s capital within six months. The Partnership has restrictions in place which govern the withdrawal of capital. Under the terms of the Partnership Agreement, limited partners requesting withdrawal from the Partnership are to be repaid their capital in three equal annual installments beginning no earlier than 90 days after their withdrawal notice is received by the Managing ~~Partner (as defined in the Partnership Agreement).~~Partner. The capital of general partners requesting withdrawal from the Partnership is converted to subordinated limited partnership capital or, at the discretion of the Managing Partner, redeemed by the Partnership. Subordinated limited partners requesting withdrawal are repaid their capital in six equal annual installments beginning no earlier than 90 days after their request for withdrawal of contributed capital is received by the Managing Partner. The Partnership’s Managing Partner has discretion to waive or modify these withdrawal restrictions and to accelerate the return of capital.

The Partnership makes loans available to those general partners and, in limited circumstances, subordinated limited partners (in each case, other than members of the Executive Committee) who require financing for some or all of their Partnership capital contributions. In limited circumstances a general partner may withdraw from the Partnership and become a subordinated limited partner while he or she still has an outstanding Partnership loan. It is anticipated that, of the future general and subordinated limited partnership capital contributions (in each case, other than for Executive Committee members) requiring financing, the majority will be financed through Partnership loans. Loans made by the Partnership to such partners are generally for a period of one year but are expected to be renewed and bear interest at the interest rate defined in the loan documents. The Partnership recognizes interest income for the interest earned related to these loans. Partners borrowing from the Partnership will be required to repay such loans by applying the earnings received from the Partnership to such loans, net of amounts retained by the Partnership, amounts distributed for income taxes and 5% of earnings distributed to the partner. The Partnership has full recourse against any partner that defaults on loan obligations to the Partnership. The Partnership does not anticipate that ~~Partnership~~partner loans will have an adverse impact on the Partnership’s short-term liquidity or capital resources.

Any partner may also choose to have individual banking arrangements for their Partnership capital contributions. Any bank financing of capital contributions is in the form of unsecured bank loan agreements and is between the individual and the bank. The Partnership does not guarantee these bank loans, nor can the partner pledge his or her ~~Partnership~~partnership interest as collateral for the bank loan. The Partnership performs certain administrative functions in connection with its limited partners who have elected to finance a portion of their Partnership capital contributions through individual unsecured bank loan agreements from banks with whom the Partnership has other banking relationships. For all limited partner capital contributions financed through such bank loan agreements, each agreement instructs the Partnership to apply the proceeds from the redemption of that individual’s capital account to the repayment of the limited ~~partner’s~~partner's bank loan prior to any funds being released to the partner. In addition, the partner is required to apply Partnership earnings, net of any distributions to pay taxes, to service the interest and principal on the bank loan. Should a partner’s individual bank loan not be renewed upon maturity for any reason, the Partnership could experience increased requests for capital liquidations, which could adversely impact the Partnership’s liquidity. In addition, partners who finance all or a portion of their capital contributions with bank financing may be more likely to request the withdrawal of capital to meet bank financing requirements should the partners experience a period of reduced earnings. As a partnership, any withdrawals by general partners, subordinated limited partners or limited partners would reduce the Partnership’s available liquidity and capital.

Many of the same banks that provide financing to limited partners also provide financing to the Partnership. To the extent ~~any of~~ these banks increase credit available to the partners, financing available to the Partnership ~~itself~~ may be reduced.

The Partnership, while not a party to any partner unsecured bank loan agreements, does facilitate making payments of allocated income to certain banks on behalf of the limited partner. The following table represents amounts related to Partnership loans as well as ~~limited partner~~ bank loans (for which the Partnership facilitates certain administrative functions). Partners may have arranged their own bank loans to finance their ~~Partnership~~partnership capital for which the Partnership does not facilitate certain administrative functions and therefore any such loans are not included in the table.

	As of March 30, 2018												As of March 29, 2019
	Limited Partnership Interests			Subordinated Limited Partnership Interests			General Partnership Interests			Total Partnership Interests			Limited Partnership Interests			Subordinated Limited Partnership Interests			General Partnership Interests			Total Partnership Interests
Total Partnership capital⁽¹⁾	$	892		$	511		$	1,490		$	2,893		$	1,261		$	528		$	1,596		$	3,385
Partnership capital owned by partners with individual loans	$	92		$	5		$	894		$	991		$	637		$	8		$	996		$	1,641
Partnership capital owned by partners with individual loans as a percent of total Partnership capital		10	%		1	%		60	%		34	%		51	%		2	%		62	%		48	%

Individual loans:
Individual bank loans	$	22		$	—		$	—		$	22		$	193		$	—		$	—		$	193
Individual Partnership loans		—			2			379			381			—			5			417			422
Total individual loans	$	22		$	2		$	379		$	403		$	193		$	5		$	417		$	615
Individual loans as a percent of total Partnership capital		2	%		0	%		25	%		14	%		15	%		1	%		26	%		18	%
Individual loans as a percent of respective Partnership capital owned by partners with loans		24	%		40	%		42	%		41	%		30	%		63	%		42	%		37	%

Historically, neither the amount of Partnership capital financed with individual loans as indicated in the table above, nor the amount of partner withdrawal requests, has had a significant impact on the Partnership’s liquidity or capital resources.

The following table shows the composition of the Partnership’s aggregate bank lines of credit in place as of:

	March 30,		December 31,		March 29,		December 31,
	2018		2017		2019		2018
2013 Credit Facility	$	400	$	400
2018 Credit Facility					$	500	$	500
Uncommitted secured credit facilities		290		290		290		290
Total bank lines of credit	$	690	$	690	$	790	$	790

In November 2013, the Partnership entered into a $400 committed unsecured revolving line of credit ("2013 Credit Facility"), which expires in November 2018. The 2013 Credit Facility is intended to provide short-term liquidity to the Partnership should the need arise. In accordance with the terms of the ~~2013~~Partnership's $500 committed revolving line of credit (the "2018 Credit ~~Facility,~~Facility") entered into in September 2018, the Partnership is required to maintain a leverage ratio of no more than 35% and minimum Partnership capital, net of reserve for anticipated withdrawals and Partnership loans, of at least ~~$1,382 plus 50%~~$1,884. In addition, Edward Jones is required to maintain a minimum tangible net worth of ~~subsequent issuances~~at least $1,344 and minimum regulatory net capital of ~~Partnership capital.~~at least 6% of aggregate debit items as calculated under the alternative method. The Partnership ~~expects~~has the ability to ~~enter into a new, similar credit facility prior~~draw on various types of loans. The associated interest rate depends on the ~~expiration~~type of loan, duration of the ~~2013~~loan, whether the loan is secured or unsecured and the amount of leverage. Rates include the federal funds rate plus the applicable rate, eurodollar rate plus the applicable rate, and the Alternative Base Rate plus the applicable rate. The 2018 Credit ~~Facility.~~Facility is intended to provide short-term liquidity to the Partnership should the need arise. As of March ~~30, 2018,~~29, 2019, the Partnership was in compliance with all covenants related to the ~~2013~~2018 Credit Facility.

In addition, the Partnership has uncommitted lines of credit that are subject to change at the discretion of the banks. Based on credit market conditions and the uncommitted nature of these credit facilities, it is possible that these lines of credit could decrease or not be available in the future. Actual borrowing availability on the uncommitted secured lines is based on availability of client margin securities and firm-owned securities, which would serve as collateral on loans in the event the Partnership borrowed against these lines.

There were no amounts outstanding on the ~~2013~~2018 Credit Facility or the uncommitted lines of credit as of March ~~30, 2018 and~~29, 2019 or December 31, ~~2017.~~2018. In addition, the Partnership did not have any draws against these lines of credit during the three month period ended March ~~30, 2018.~~29, 2019. For the purpose of periodically testing draw procedures, the Partnership made an overnight draw on the uncommitted facility in April ~~2018.~~2019.

As of March ~~30, 2018,~~29, 2019, the Partnership had ~~$1,017~~$1,370 in cash and cash equivalents and ~~$824~~$1,232 in securities purchased under agreements to resell, which generally have maturities of less than one week. This totaled to ~~$1,841~~$2,602 of Partnership liquidity as of March ~~30, 2018,~~29, 2019, an 8% ($~~169) decrease~~193) increase from ~~$2,010~~$2,409 at December 31, ~~2017. This decrease~~2018. The Partnership had $7,052 and $8,241 in cash and investments segregated under federal regulations as of March 29, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively, which was not available for general use. Changes in cash were primarily due to timing of daily client cash activity in relation to the weekly segregation requirement. The Partnership had $9,069 and $10,099 in cash and investments segregated under federal regulations as of March 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively, which was not available for general use. The decline in cash and investments segregated under federal regulations was primarily due to the investment of client cash.

As a result of its activities as a U.S. broker-dealer, Edward Jones is subject to the net capital provisions of Rule 15c3-1 of the Exchange Act and capital compliance rules of the FINRA Rule 4110. Under the alternative method permitted by the rules, Edward Jones must maintain minimum net capital equal to the greater of $0.25 or 2% of aggregate debit items arising from client transactions. The net capital rules also provide that Edward Jones’ partnership capital may not be withdrawn if the resulting net capital would be less than minimum requirements. Additionally, certain withdrawals require the approval of the SEC and FINRA to the extent they exceed defined levels, even though such withdrawals would not cause net capital to be less than minimum requirements.

The Partnership’s Canada broker-dealer subsidiary is a registered broker-dealer regulated by IIROC. Under the regulations prescribed by IIROC, the Partnership's Canada broker-dealer subsidiary is required to maintain minimum levels of risk-adjusted capital, which are dependent on the nature of the Partnership’s Canada broker-dealer subsidiary's assets and operations.

The following table shows the Partnership’s ~~net~~ capital figures for its U.S. and Canada broker-dealer subsidiaries as of:

	March 30,			December 31,						March 29,			December 31,
	2018			2017			% Change			2019			2018			% Change
U.S.:
Net capital	$	1,040		$	1,107			-6	%	$	1,372		$	1,280			7	%
Net capital in excess of the minimum required	$	982		$	1,049			-6	%	$	1,315		$	1,221			8	%
Net capital as a percentage of aggregate debit items		35.9	%		38.1	%		-6	%		48.1	%		43.6	%		10	%
Net capital after anticipated capital withdrawals, as a percentage of aggregate debit items		19.0	%		21.6	%		-12	%		28.8	%		28.3	%		2	%

Canada:
Regulatory risk-adjusted capital	$	47		$	50			-6	%	$	35		$	40			-13	%
Regulatory risk-adjusted capital in excess of the minimum required to be held by IIROC	$	47		$	42			12	%	$	24		$	39			-38	%

~~Net~~U.S. net capital and Canada risk-adjusted capital and the related capital percentages may fluctuate on a daily basis. In addition, Trust Co. was in compliance with its regulatory capital ~~requirements as of March 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017.~~requirements.

The Partnership’s net assets are primarily monetary, consisting of cash and cash equivalents, cash and investments segregated under federal regulations, firm-owned securities, and receivables, less liabilities. Monetary net assets are primarily liquid in nature and would not be significantly affected by inflation. Inflation and future expectations of inflation influence securities prices, as well as activity levels in the securities markets. As a result, profitability and capital may be impacted by inflation and inflationary expectations. Additionally, inflation’s impact on the Partnership’s operating expenses may affect profitability to the extent that additional costs are not recoverable through increased prices of services offered by the Partnership.

There have been no material changes to the Partnership’s disclosures of recently issued accounting standards as described in Part II, Item 8 – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 1 of the Partnership's Annual Report. See Note 2 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for adopted accounting standards.

On May 7, 2018, the Partnership announced that it had appointed general partner Penny Pennington, 54, as Managing Partner of the Partnership, effective January 1, 2019. Ms. Pennington will replace current Managing Partner James Weddle, who has led the firm for the past 13 years and, as previously disclosed, will retire as Managing Partner as of December 31, 2018. Ms. Pennington is a member of the Partnership’s Executive, Management and Audit Committees, and is the principal responsible for Edward Jones’ Client Strategies Group, which encompasses Client Solutions, Products, Research and Trading, and Marketing. For the remainder of 2018, she will work with Managing Partner James Weddle and the Executive Committee to transition her current responsibilities.

~~Ms. Pennington joined Edward Jones in 2000 as a financial advisor in Livonia, Michigan where she built a successful practice. In 2006, she was named a principal~~ ~~and relocated~~ ~~to the~~ ~~firm's~~ St. Louis headquarters, where she has held a number of senior leadership roles in key divisions. Most recently, she has led the Client Strategies Group since 2015. Ms. Pennington holds a Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA) designation, is a graduate of The University of Pennsylvania's Wharton School Securities Industry Institute, and earned her MBA from the Kellogg School of Management at Northwestern University.

The Partnership Agreement provides that the Managing Partner has primary responsibility for administering the Partnership's business, determining its policies and controlling the management and conduct of the Partnership's business.

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, and in particular Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. You can identify forward-looking statements by the use of the words “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “estimate,” “project,” “will,” “should,” and other expressions which predict or indicate future events and trends and which do not relate to historical matters. You should not rely on forward-looking statements because they involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, some of which are beyond the control of the Partnership. These risks, uncertainties and other factors may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the Partnership to be materially different from the anticipated future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements.

Some of the factors that might cause differences between forward-looking statements and actual events include, but are not limited to, the following: (1) general economic conditions, including an economic downturn or volatility in the U.S. and/or global securities markets; (2) regulatory actions; (3) changes in legislation or regulation, including new regulations under the Dodd-Frank Act and rules promulgated by the ~~DOL, including, without limitation, rules promulgated under ERISA,~~SEC and ~~the SEC;~~DOL; (4) actions of competitors; (5) litigation; (6) the

ability of clients, other broker-dealers, banks, depositories and clearing organizations to fulfill contractual obligations; (7) changes in interest rates; (8) changes in technology and other technology-related risks; (9) a fluctuation or decline in the fair value of securities; (10) our ability to attract and retain qualified financial advisors and other employees; and (11) the risks discussed under Part I, Item 1A – Risk Factors in the Partnership’s Annual Report and Part II, Item 1A – Risk Factors ~~of this~~in the Partnership's Quarterly ~~Report~~Reports on Form ~~10-Q.~~10-Q for the period ended March 29, 2019. These forward-looking statements were based on information, plans, and estimates at the date of this report, and the Partnership does not undertake to update any forward-looking statements to reflect changes in underlying assumptions or factors, new information, future events or other changes.

Various levels of management within the Partnership manage the Partnership’s risk exposure. Position limits in inventory accounts are established and monitored on an ongoing basis. Credit risk related to various financing activities is reduced by the industry practice of obtaining and maintaining collateral. The Partnership monitors its exposure to counterparty risk through the use of credit exposure information, the monitoring of collateral values and the establishment of credit limits. For further discussion of monitoring, see the Risk Management discussion in Part III, Item 10 – Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance of the Partnership’s Annual Report. All amounts are presented in millions, except as otherwise noted.

The Partnership is exposed to market risk from changes in interest rates. Such changes in interest rates impact the income from interest-earning assets, primarily receivables from clients on margin balances and short-term, primarily overnight, investments, which are primarily comprised of cash and cash equivalents, investments segregated under federal regulations, and securities purchased under agreements to resell, which averaged $2.9 billion and ~~$11.3~~$9.6 billion, respectively, for the three ~~month period~~months ended March ~~30, 2018.~~29, 2019. These investments earned interest at an average annual rate of approximately ~~131~~225 basis points ~~(1.31%~~(2.25%) during the first quarter of ~~2018.~~2019. Changes in interest rates also have an impact on the expense related to the liabilities that finance these assets, such as amounts payable to clients.

The Partnership performed an analysis of its financial instruments and assessed the related interest rate risk and materiality in accordance with the SEC rules. Under current market conditions and based on current levels of interest-earning assets and the liabilities that finance these assets, the Partnership estimates that a 100 basis point (1.00%) increase in short-term interest rates could increase its annual net interest income by approximately ~~$55.~~$85. Conversely, the Partnership estimates that a 100 basis point (1.00%) decrease in short-term interest rates could decrease the Partnership’s annual net interest income by approximately $81. The Partnership has put in place an interest rate floor for the interest charged related to its client margin loans, which helps to limit the negative impact of declining interest rates. An increase in short-term$75. If interest rates has a lesser impact on net interest income as the increase in interest income earned on receivables from client margin balances and investments segregated under federal regulations would be primarily offset by an increase in interest expense paid on amounts payable to clients. For interest paid on amounts payable to clients, the positive impact of declining interest rates is limited, due to the current low interest rate environment, and the negative impact of increasing interest rates is limited, asincreased 100 basis points, the Partnership does not expect to increase ~~interest~~ rates at the same ~~level.~~

level, resulting in a smaller increase in interest expense and an overall greater impact on net interest income.

The Partnership maintains a system of disclosure controls and procedures which are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Partnership in the reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Partnership’s certifying officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Based upon an evaluation performed as of the end of the period covered by this report, the Partnership’s certifying officers, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, have concluded that the Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of March ~~30, 2018.~~29, 2019.

There have been no changes in the Partnership’s last fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting.

The ~~following~~ information in Part I, Item 1, Note 8 supplements the discussion in ~~Part I,~~ Item 3 – Legal Proceedings in the Partnership's Annual Report.

~~Mutual Fund Share Class Waivers~~. As previously disclosed, on October 26, 2015, Edward Jones, without admitting or denying the findings, entered into a settlement agreement with FINRA in connection with its investigation of possible violations of the federal securities laws or rules with respect to mutual fund purchases and sales charge waivers for certain retirement plan and charitable organization accounts. On June 12, 2015, the Division of Enforcement of the SEC informed Edward Jones that it is also investigating this matter. The SEC’s review is ongoing. Consistent with its practice, Edward Jones is cooperating fully with the SEC with respect to its investigation.

~~Retirement Plan Litigation. On August 19, 2016, JFC, Edward Jones and certain other defendants were named in a putative class action lawsuit (McDonald v. Edward D. Jones & Co., L.P., et al.~~) filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri brought under ERISA, by a participant in the Edward D. Jones & Co. Profit Sharing and 401(k) Plan (the "Retirement Plan"). The lawsuit alleges that the defendants breached their fiduciary duties to Retirement Plan participants and seeks declaratory and equitable relief and monetary damages on behalf of the Retirement Plan. The defendants filed a motion to dismiss the ~~McDonald~~ ~~lawsuit which was granted in part dismissing the claim against JFC, and denied in part as to all other defendants on January 26, 2017.~~

~~On November 11, 2016, a substantially similar lawsuit (Schultz, et al. v. Edward D. Jones & Co., L.P., et al.) was filed in the same court. The plaintiffs consolidated the two lawsuits by adding the~~ ~~Schultz~~ ~~plaintiffs to the~~ ~~McDonald~~ ~~case, and the~~ ~~Schultz~~ action was dismissed. The plaintiffs filed their first amended consolidated complaint on April 28, 2017. The defendants filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit on May 26, 2017, which was denied on March 27, 2018.

~~Wage-and-Hour Class Action. On September 22, 2017, Edward Jones was named as a defendant in a purported collective and class action lawsuit (White v. Edward D. Jones & Co., L.P.~~) filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio by a former branch office administrator. The lawsuit was brought under the Fair Labor Standards Act as well as Ohio law and alleges that Edward Jones underpaid overtime compensation to branch office administrators. The lawsuit seeks compensatory damages in the amount of the unpaid wages as well as liquidated damages in an equal amount. On April 24, 2018, the court approved the parties' settlement and issued its final order of dismissal, without prejudice.

~~Wage-and-Hour Class Action.~~ ~~On March 13, 2018, JFC and Edward Jones were named as defendants in a purported collective and class action lawsuit (Bland, et. al. v. Edward D. Jones & Co., L.P, et. al.~~) filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois by four former financial advisors. The lawsuit was brought under the Fair Labor Standards Act as well as Missouri and Illinois law and alleges that the defendants unlawfully attempted torecoup training costs from departing financial advisors and failed to pay all overtime owed to financial advisor trainees among other claims. The lawsuit seeks declaratory and injunctive relief, compensatory and liquidated damages. JFC and Edward Jones intend to vigorously defend against the allegations in this lawsuit.

~~Securities Class Action.~~ ~~On March 30, 2018, Edward D. Jones & Co., L.P. and its affiliated entities and individuals were named as defendants in a putative class action (Anderson, et. al. v. Edward D. Jones & Co., L.P., et. al.)~~ filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California. The lawsuit was brought under the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as well as Missouri and California law and alleges that the defendants inappropriately transitioned clients from commission-based accounts to fee-based programs. The plaintiffs have requested declaratory, equitable, and exemplary relief, and compensatory damages. Edward Jones and its affiliated entities and individuals deny the allegations and intend to vigorously defend this lawsuit.

For information regarding risk factors affecting the Partnership, please see the language in Part I, Item 2 – Forward-looking Statements of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and the discussion in Part I, Item 1A – Risk Factors of the Partnership's Annual Report. The following risk ~~factor supplements~~factors supplement the risk ~~factor~~factors in Part I, Item 1A – Risk Factors – Risk Related to the Partnership's Business ~~– Legislative and Regulatory Initiatives~~ of the Partnership's Annual Report.

Legislative and ~~and~~Regulatory Initiatives — Legislative and Regulatory Initiatives could significantly impact the regulation and operation of the Partnership and its subsidiaries. In addition, Legislative and Regulatory Initiatives may significantly alter or restrict the Partnership’s historic business practices, which could negatively affect its operating results.

The Partnership is subject to extensive regulation by federal and state regulatory agencies and by self-regulatory organizations ~~("SROs")~~ and other regulators. The Partnership operates in a regulatory environment that is subject to ongoing change and has seen significantly increased regulation in recent years. The Partnership may be adversely affected as a result of new or revised legislation or regulations, by changes in federal, state or foreign tax laws and regulations, or by changes in the interpretation or enforcement of existing laws and regulations.

Legislative and Regulatory Initiatives may impact the manner in which the Partnership markets its products and services, manages its business and operations, and interacts with clients and regulators, any or all of which could materially impact the Partnership’s results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity. Regulatory changes or changes in the law could increase compliance costs which would adversely impact profitability.

The Partnership continues to monitor several Legislative and Regulatory Initiatives, including, but not limited to:

~~DOL Fiduciary Rule~~. The DOL issued its final rule defining the term "fiduciary" and exemptions related thereto in the context of ERISA and retirement accounts in April 2016. Certain provisions of the rule, including the impartial conduct standards, became applicable on June 9, 2017, with the remaining provisions scheduled to become applicable on July 1, 2019. On March 15, 2018, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals issued an opinion vacating the DOL fiduciary rule and related exemptions. While the court ruling became final on May 8, 2018, the procedural time frame for appeal has not yet been exhausted. In addition, the DOL recently stated that it will not pursue prohibited transaction claims against those working diligently and in good faith to comply with the impartial conduct standards for transactions that would have been exempted under the prior fiduciary rule, but it is unclear whether the DOL will issue any new permanent exemptions going forward.

During the quarter ended March 30, 2018, the Partnership issued subordinated limited partnership interests (the “SLP Interests”), which are fully described in the Partnership Agreement. The Partnership issued the SLP Interests pursuant to Regulation D under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, on March 1, 2018, to a retiring general partner of the Partnership for an aggregate price of $294,814.None.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant in the capacities and on the dates indicated:

Large accelerated filer	☐		Accelerated filer	☐
Non-accelerated filer	☒	~~(do not check if a smaller reporting company)~~	Smaller reporting company	☐
Emerging growth company	☐


Title of each class	Trading Symbol(s)	Name of exchange on which registered
None	N/A	N/A

		Page

PART I.	FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.	Financial Statements	3

	Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition	3
	Consolidated Statements of Income	4
	Consolidated Statements of Changes in Partnership Capital	5
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	56
	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	67

Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	1617

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	31

Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	3231

PART II.	OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	3332

Item 1A.	Risk Factors	3332

Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	3532

Item 6.	Exhibits	3633

	Signatures	4034

Exhibit Number		Description
3.1	*	~~Nineteenth~~Twentieth Amended and Restated Agreement of Registered Limited Liability Limited Partnership, dated ~~June~~August 6, ~~2014,~~2018, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.1 to The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P. Form 8-K dated ~~June~~August 6, ~~2014.~~2018.
3.2	*	~~Twentieth~~Twenty-First Restated Certificate of Limited Partnership of ~~The~~the Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P., dated January ~~30, 2015, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.2 to The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014.~~
~~3.3~~	*	First Amendment of Twentieth Restated Certificate of Limited Partnership of The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P., dated March 9, 2015, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.3 to The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014.
~~3.4~~	*	Second Amendment of Twentieth Restated Certificate of Limited Partnership of The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P., dated April 7, 2015, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.1 to The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P. Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 27, 2015.
~~3.5~~	*	Third Amendment of Twentieth Restated Certificate of Limited Partnership of The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P., dated May 12, 2015, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.1 to The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P. Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 26, 2015.
~~3.6~~	*	~~Fourth Amendment of Twentieth Restated Certificate of Limited Partnership of The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P., dated June~~ 24, ~~2015, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.2 to The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P. Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 26, 2015.~~
~~3.7~~	*	Fifth Amendment of Twentieth Restated Certificate of Limited Partnership of The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P., dated July 27, 2015, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.3 to The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P. Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 26, 2015.
~~3.8~~	*	Sixth Amendment of Twentieth Restated Certificate of Limited Partnership of The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P., dated August 24, 2015, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.1 to The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P. Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 25, 2015.
~~3.9~~	*	Seventh Amendment of Twentieth Restated Certificate of Limited Partnership of The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P., dated September 21, 2015, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.2 to The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P. Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 25, 2015.
~~3.10~~	*	Eighth Amendment of Twentieth Restated Certificate of Limited Partnership of The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P., dated October 26, 2015, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.3 to The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P. Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 25, 2015.
~~3.11~~	*	~~Ninth Amendment of Twentieth Restated Certificate of Limited Partnership of The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P., dated November 20, 2015,~~2019, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.2 to The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, ~~2015.~~2018.
~~3.12~~ 3.3	*	~~Tenth~~First Amendment of ~~Twentieth~~Twenty-First Restated Certificate of Limited Partnership of The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P., dated ~~January 22, 2016,~~February 21, 2019, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.3 to The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, ~~2015.~~2018.
~~3.13~~ 3.4	**	~~Eleventh~~Second Amendment of Twentieth Restated Certificate of Limited Partnership of The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P., dated February 16, 2016, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.4 to The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015.

~~Exhibit Number~~		~~Description~~
~~3.14~~	*	~~Twelfth Amendment of Twentieth~~Twenty-First Restated Certificate of Limited Partnership of The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P., dated March ~~21, 2016, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.1 to The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P. Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March~~ 25, ~~2016.~~2019.
~~3.15~~ 3.5	**	~~Thirteenth~~Third Amendment of ~~Twentieth~~Twenty-First Restated Certificate of Limited Partnership of The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P., dated April ~~26, 2016, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.2 to The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P. Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 25, 2016.~~22, 2019.
~~3.16~~	*	Fourteenth Amendment of Twentieth Restated Certificate of Limited Partnership of The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P., dated May 23, 2016, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.1 to The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P. Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 24, 2016.
~~3.17~~	*	Fifteenth Amendment of Twentieth Restated Certificate of Limited Partnership of The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P., dated June 22, 2016, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.2 to The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P. Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 24, 2016.
~~3.18~~	*	Sixteenth Amendment of Twentieth Restated Certificate of Limited Partnership of The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P., dated July 20, 2016, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.3 to The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P. Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 24, 2016.
~~3.19~~	*	Seventeenth Amendment of Twentieth Restated Certificate of Limited Partnership of The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P., dated August 25, 2016, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.1 to The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P. Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2016.
~~3.20~~	*	Eighteenth Amendment of Twentieth Restated Certificate of Limited Partnership of The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P., dated September 21, 2016, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.2 to The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P. Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2016.
~~3.21~~	*	Nineteenth Amendment of Twentieth Restated Certificate of Limited Partnership of The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P., dated October 19, 2016, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.3 to The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P. Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2016.
~~3.22~~	*	Twentieth Amendment of Twentieth Restated Certificate of Limited Partnership of The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P., dated November 17, 2016, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.22 to The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016.
~~3.23~~	*	Twenty-First Amendment of Twentieth Restated Certificate of Limited Partnership of The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P., dated December 21, 2016, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.23 to The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016.
~~3.24~~	*	Twenty-Second Amendment of Twentieth Restated Certificate of Limited Partnership of The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P., dated January 25, 2017, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.24 to The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016.
~~3.25~~	*	Twenty-Third Amendment of Twentieth Restated Certificate of Limited Partnership of The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P., dated February 22, 2017, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.25 to The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016.
~~3.26~~	*	Twenty-Fourth Amendment of Twentieth Restated Certificate of Limited Partnership of The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P., dated April 25, 2017, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.26 to The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P. Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2017.
~~3.27~~	*	Twenty-Fifth Amendment of Twentieth Restated Certificate of Limited Partnership of The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P., dated May 25, 2017, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.27 to The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P. Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2017.

2019	$	202
2020		232
2021		184
2022		128
2023		74
Thereafter		60
Total lease payments		880
Less: Interest		71
Total present value of lease liabilities	$	809

	Gross amounts of		Gross amounts offset in the Consolidated Statements of		Net amounts presented in the Consolidated Statements of		Gross amounts not offset in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition
	recognized assets		Financial Condition		Financial Condition		Financial instruments		Securities collateral⁽¹⁾			Net amount
Mar 30, 2018	$	824		—		824		—		(824	)	$	—
Dec 31, 2017	$	1,164		—		1,164		—		(1,164	)	$	—

~~Exhibit Number~~		~~Description~~
~~3.28~~	*	Twenty-Sixth Amendment of Twentieth Restated Certificate of Limited Partnership of The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P., dated June 21, 2017, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.28 to The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P. Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2017.
~~3.29~~	*	Twenty-Seventh Amendment of Twentieth Restated Certificate of Limited Partnership of The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P., dated July 12, 2017, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.29 to The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P. Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2017.
~~3.30~~	*	Twenty-Eighth Amendment of Twentieth Restated Certificate of Limited Partnership of The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P., dated September 20, 2017, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.30 to The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P. Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 29, 2017.
~~3.31~~	*	Twenty-Ninth Amendment of Twentieth Restated Certificate of Limited Partnership of The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P., dated November 17, 2017, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.31 to The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017.
~~3.32~~	*	Thirtieth Amendment of Twentieth Restated Certificate of Limited Partnership of The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P., dated December 20, 2017, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.32 to The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017.
~~3.33~~	*	Thirty-First Amendment of Twentieth Restated Certificate of Limited Partnership of The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P., dated January 24, 2018, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.33 to The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017.
~~3.34~~	*	Thirty-Second Amendment of Twentieth Restated Certificate of Limited Partnership of The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P., dated February 21, 2018, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.34 to The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017.
~~3.35~~	**	~~Thirty-Third Amendment of Twentieth Restated Certificate of Limited Partnership of The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P., dated March 28, 2018.~~
~~3.36~~	**	~~Thirty-Fourth Amendment of Twentieth Restated Certificate of Limited Partnership of The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P., dated April 25, 2018.~~
31.1	**	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15(d)-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as adopted pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2	**	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15(d)-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as adopted pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1	**	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2	**	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101.INS	**	XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH	**	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema
101.CAL	**	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation
101.DEF	**	XBRL Extension Definition
101.LAB	**	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label

~~Exhibit Number~~		~~Description~~
101.PRE	**	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation

THE JONES FINANCIAL COMPANIES, L.L.L.P.

By:		/s/ ~~James D. Weddle~~Penny Pennington
		~~James D. Weddle~~Penny Pennington
		Managing Partner (Principal Executive Officer)
		May 10, ~~2018~~2019

Signatures	Title	Date

/s/ ~~James D. Weddle~~Penny Pennington	Managing Partner (Principal Executive Officer)	May 10, ~~2018~~2019
~~James D. Weddle~~Penny Pennington	Managing Partner (Principal Executive Officer)	May 10, ~~2018~~2019

/s/ Kevin D. Bastien	Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)	May 10, ~~2018~~2019
Kevin D. Bastien		May 10, ~~2018~~2019