Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.Yes☒No☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically ~~and posted on its corporate Web site, if any,~~ every Interactive Data File required to be submitted ~~and posted~~ pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit ~~and post~~ such files). Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒

As of ~~July 27, 2018, 203,485,719~~August 1, 2019, 205,314,527 shares of the registrant’s $.01 par value common stock were outstanding.

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended						Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,						June 30,						June 30,
	2018			2017			2018			2017			2019			2018			2019			2018
Net Sales	$	2,007.6		$	1,949.5		$	4,025.2		$	3,921.9		$	1,988.6		$	2,007.6		$	3,964.1		$	4,025.2
Cost of products sold, excluding intangible asset amortization		583.7			527.7			1,159.5			1,040.6			581.3			583.7			1,134.7			1,159.5
Intangible asset amortization		149.5			147.7			300.3			299.7			146.9			149.5			290.3			300.3
Research and development		99.1			92.6			194.8			183.7			112.1			99.1			213.8			194.8
Selling, general and administrative		791.3			752.2			1,593.0			1,527.9			840.3			791.3			1,636.7			1,593.0
Intangible asset impairment		-			26.8			-			26.8			70.1			-			70.1			-
Acquisition, integration and related		50.5			72.5			96.5			130.7			10.5			50.5			21.2			96.5
Quality remediation		37.5			49.9			80.1			84.3			22.7			37.5			42.4			80.1
Operating expenses		1,711.6			1,669.4			3,424.2			3,293.7			1,783.9			1,711.6			3,409.2			3,424.2
Operating Profit		296.0			280.1			601.0			628.2			204.7			296.0			554.9			601.0
Other expense, net		(2.9	)		(1.7	)		(6.5	)		(2.2	)		(4.7	)		(2.9	)		(5.2	)		(6.5	)
Interest income		0.6			0.3			1.5			0.8
Interest expense		(75.9	)		(82.3	)		(154.8	)		(165.2	)
Interest expense, net														(59.7	)		(75.3	)		(117.7	)		(153.3	)
Earnings before income taxes		217.8			196.4			441.2			461.6			140.3			217.8			432.0			441.2
Provision (benefit) for income taxes		32.9			12.3			80.1			(21.8	)
Provision for income taxes														8.4			32.9			53.9			80.1
Net Earnings		184.9			184.1			361.1			483.4			131.9			184.9			378.1			361.1
Less: Net earnings (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest		(0.1	)		(0.1	)		1.4			(0.2	)
Less: Net (loss) earnings attributable to noncontrolling interest														(1.8	)		(0.1	)		(1.7	)		1.4
Net Earnings of Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc.	$	185.0		$	184.2		$	359.7		$	483.6		$	133.7		$	185.0		$	379.8		$	359.7
Earnings Per Common Share
Basic	$	0.91		$	0.91		$	1.77		$	2.40		$	0.65		$	0.91		$	1.86		$	1.77
Diluted	$	0.90		$	0.90		$	1.76		$	2.38		$	0.65		$	0.90		$	1.84		$	1.76
Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding
Basic		203.3			201.8			203.2			201.4			204.8			203.3			204.6			203.2
Diluted		204.6			203.7			204.6			203.4			206.2			204.6			206.0			204.6
Cash Dividends Declared Per Common Share	$	0.24		$	0.24		$	0.48		$	0.48

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended						Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,						June 30,						June 30,
	2018			2017			2018			2017			2019			2018			2019			2018
Net Earnings	$	184.9		$	184.1		$	361.1		$	483.4		$	131.9		$	184.9		$	378.1		$	361.1
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss):
Foreign currency cumulative translation adjustments, net of tax		(177.8	)		189.2			(83.0	)		238.2			15.1			(177.8	)		10.7			(83.0	)
Unrealized cash flow hedge gains (losses), net of tax		51.6			(24.8	)		25.2			(51.1	)
Unrealized cash flow hedge gains, net of tax														0.4			51.6			14.9			25.2
Reclassification adjustments on hedges, net of tax		9.2			(4.5	)		18.9			(13.5	)		(6.2	)		9.2			(14.4	)		18.9
Adjustments to prior service cost and unrecognized actuarial assumptions, net of tax		5.3			(0.5	)		2.0			(4.0	)		2.4			5.3			4.4			2.0
Total Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)		(111.7	)		159.4			(36.9	)		169.6			11.7			(111.7	)		15.6			(36.9	)
Comprehensive Income		73.2			343.5			324.2			653.0			143.6			73.2			393.7			324.2
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to the noncontrolling interest		-			(0.2	)		1.4			(0.4	)
Comprehensive (loss) income attributable to the noncontrolling interest														(1.8	)		-			(1.7	)		1.4
Comprehensive Income Attributable to
Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc.	$	73.2		$	343.7		$	322.8		$	653.4		$	145.4		$	73.2		$	395.4		$	322.8

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

	June 30,			December 31,			June 30,			December 31,
	2018			2017			2019			2018
ASSETS
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	481.2		$	524.4		$	403.1		$	542.8
Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts		1,335.3			1,544.1			1,247.1			1,275.8
Inventories		2,158.5			2,068.3			2,344.5			2,256.5
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		500.2			428.0			396.5			352.3
Total Current Assets		4,475.2			4,564.8			4,391.2			4,427.4
Property, plant and equipment, net		1,986.9			2,038.6			2,035.8			2,015.4
Goodwill		10,595.9			10,668.4			9,593.7			9,594.4
Intangible assets, net		7,996.6			8,353.4			7,524.2			7,684.6
Other assets		436.2			388.8			660.8			405.0
Total Assets	$	25,490.8		$	26,014.0		$	24,205.7		$	24,126.8
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	355.7		$	330.2		$	347.5		$	362.6
Income taxes payable		211.7			165.2			144.7			142.4
Other current liabilities		1,186.2			1,349.3			1,185.6			1,391.3
Current portion of long-term debt		100.0			1,225.0			2,000.0			525.0
Total Current Liabilities		1,853.6			3,069.7			3,677.8			2,421.3
Deferred income taxes		1,080.9			1,101.5
Deferred income taxes, net								949.9			999.5
Long-term income tax payable		755.0			744.0			677.9			666.2
Other long-term liabilities		343.8			445.8			518.6			350.0
Long-term debt		9,413.3			8,917.5			6,719.3			8,413.7
Total Liabilities		13,446.6			14,278.5			12,543.5			12,850.7
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 15)
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 17)
Stockholders' Equity:
Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. Stockholders' Equity:
Common stock, $0.01 par value, one billion shares authorized, 307.2 million shares issued in 2018 (306.5 million in 2017)		3.1			3.1
Common stock, $0.01 par value, one billion shares authorized, 308.8 million shares in 2019 (307.9 million in 2018) issued								3.1			3.1
Paid-in capital		8,596.8			8,514.9			8,776.5			8,686.1
Retained earnings		10,327.9			10,022.8			9,772.7			9,491.2
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(163.0	)		(83.2	)		(171.8	)		(187.4	)
Treasury stock, 103.8 million shares in 2018 (103.9 million shares in 2017)		(6,721.7	)		(6,721.8	)
Treasury stock, 103.9 million shares in 2019 (103.9 million shares in 2018)								(6,721.4	)		(6,721.7	)
Total Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. stockholders' equity		12,043.1			11,735.8			11,659.1			11,271.3
Noncontrolling interest		1.1			(0.3	)		3.1			4.8
Total Stockholders' Equity		12,044.2			11,735.5			11,662.2			11,276.1
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity	$	25,490.8		$	26,014.0		$	24,205.7		$	24,126.8

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

For the Six Months Ended June 30,

2018

2017

Cash flows provided by (used in) operating activities:

Net earnings

$
361.1

$
483.4

Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to cash provided
by operating activities:

Depreciation and amortization

525.1

531.7

Share-based compensation

26.0

27.7

Intangible asset impairment

-

26.8

Inventory step-up

-

30.9

Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effect of acquisitions:

Income taxes

(42.4
)

(210.4
)
Receivables

177.7

226.3

Inventories

(99.3
)

(69.7
)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses

(27.1
)

(201.2
)
Other assets and liabilities

(37.3
)

(129.6
)
Net cash provided by operating activities

883.8

715.9

Cash flows used in investing activities:

Additions to instruments

(126.1
)

(172.6
)
Additions to other property, plant and equipment

(53.7
)

(73.8
)
Other business combination investments, net of acquired cash

-

(4.0
)
Other investing activities

(15.5
)

(11.7
)
Net cash used in investing activities

(195.3
)

(262.1
)
Cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities:

Proceeds from senior notes

749.5

-

Payments on senior notes

(1,150.0
)

-

Proceeds from multicurrency revolving facility

400.0

400.0

Payments on multicurrency revolving facility

(375.0
)

(400.0
)
Redemption of senior notes

-

(500.0
)
Payments on term loan

(225.0
)

(150.0
)
Net payments on other debt

(0.2
)

(0.7
)
Dividends paid to stockholders

(97.4
)

(96.5
)
Proceeds from employee stock compensation plans

56.4

105.5

Net cash flows from unremitted collections from factoring programs

(62.9
)

-

Business combination contingent consideration payments

(16.7
)

(8.1
)
Restricted stock withholdings

(2.8
)

(7.1
)
Debt issuance costs

(4.9
)

-

Net cash used in financing activities

(729.0
)

(656.9
)
Effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents

(2.7
)

19.0

Decrease in cash and cash equivalents

(43.2
)

(184.1
)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year

524.4

634.1

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period

$
481.2

$
450.0

	Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. Stockholders
										Accumulated
										Other												Total
	Common Shares				Paid-in		Retained			Comprehensive			Treasury Shares						Noncontrolling			Stockholders'
	Number		Amount		Capital		Earnings			(Loss) Income			Number			Amount			Interest			Equity
Balance April 1, 2019		308.7	$	3.1	$	8,748.1	$	9,688.1		$	(183.5	)		(103.9	)	$	(6,721.4	)	$	4.9		$	11,539.3
Net earnings		-		-		-		133.7			-			-			-			(1.8	)		131.9
Other comprehensive income		-		-		-		-			11.7			-			-			-			11.7
Cash dividends declared ($0.24 per share)		-		-		-		(49.1	)		-			-			-			-			(49.1	)
Stock compensation plans		0.1		-		28.4		-			-			-			-			-			28.4
Balance June 30, 2019		308.8	$	3.1	$	8,776.5	$	9,772.7		$	(171.8	)		(103.9	)	$	(6,721.4	)	$	3.1		$	11,662.2

Balance April 1, 2018		307.1	$	3.1	$	8,576.6	$	10,191.7		$	(51.3	)		(103.8	)	$	(6,721.7	)	$	1.1		$	11,999.5
Net earnings		-		-		-		185.0			-			-			-			(0.1	)		184.9
Other comprehensive income		-		-		-		-			(111.7	)		-			-			0.1			(111.6	)
Cash dividends declared ($0.24 per share)		-		-		-		(48.8	)		-			-			-			-			(48.8	)
Stock compensation plans		0.1		-		20.2		-			-			-			-			-			20.2
Balance June 30, 2018		307.2	$	3.1	$	8,596.8	$	10,327.9		$	(163.0	)		(103.8	)	$	(6,721.7	)	$	1.1		$	12,044.2

Balance January 1, 2019		307.9	$	3.1	$	8,686.1	$	9,491.2		$	(187.4	)		(103.9	)	$	(6,721.7	)	$	4.8		$	11,276.1
Net earnings		-		-		-		379.8			-			-			-			(1.7	)		378.1
Other comprehensive income		-		-		-		-			15.6			-			-			-			15.6
Cash dividends declared ($0.48 per share)		-		-		-		(98.3	)		-			-			-			-			(98.3	)
Stock compensation plans		0.9		-		90.4		-			-			-			0.3			-			90.7
Balance June 30, 2019		308.8	$	3.1	$	8,776.5	$	9,772.7		$	(171.8	)		(103.9	)	$	(6,721.4	)	$	3.1		$	11,662.2

Balance January 1, 2018		306.5	$	3.1	$	8,514.9	$	10,022.8		$	(83.2	)		(103.9	)	$	(6,721.8	)	$	(0.3	)	$	11,735.5
Net earnings		-		-		-		359.7			-			-			-			1.4			361.1
Other comprehensive income		-		-		-		-			(36.9	)		-			-			-			(36.9	)
Cash dividends declared ($0.48 per share)		-		-		-		(97.5	)		-			-			-			-			(97.5	)
Adoption of ASU 2018-02		-		-		-		42.9			(42.9	)		-			-			-			-
Stock compensation plans		0.7		-		81.9		-			-			0.1			0.1			-			82.0
Balance June 30, 2018		307.2	$	3.1	$	8,596.8	$	10,327.9		$	(163.0	)		(103.8	)	$	(6,721.7	)	$	1.1		$	12,044.2

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.


	For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2019			2018
Cash flows provided by (used in) operating activities:
Net earnings	$	378.1		$	361.1
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		500.7			525.1
Share-based compensation		40.0			26.0
Intangible asset impairment		70.1			-
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquired assets and liabilities
Income taxes		(44.2	)		(42.4	)
Receivables		29.3			177.7
Inventories		(83.0	)		(99.3	)
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		(269.8	)		(27.1	)
Other assets and liabilities		(36.6	)		(37.3	)
Net cash provided by operating activities		584.6			883.8
Cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities:
Additions to instruments		(144.8	)		(126.1	)
Additions to other property, plant and equipment		(96.7	)		(53.7	)
Net investment hedge settlements		21.3			-
Acquisition of intellectual property rights		(197.6	)		-
Investments in other assets		(9.9	)		(15.5	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(427.7	)		(195.3	)
Cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities:
Proceeds from senior notes		-			749.5
Redemption of senior notes		-			(1,150.0	)
Proceeds from multicurrency revolving facility		-			400.0
Payments on multicurrency revolving facility		-			(375.0	)
Proceeds from term loans		200.0			-
Payments on term loans		(425.0	)		(225.0	)
Net payments on other debt		-			(0.2	)
Dividends paid to stockholders		(98.1	)		(97.4	)
Proceeds from employee stock compensation plans		54.8			56.4
Net cash flows from unremitted collections from factoring programs		(25.6	)		(62.9	)
Business combination contingent consideration payments		-			(16.7	)
Other financing activities		(4.9	)		(7.7	)
Net cash used in financing activities		(298.8	)		(729.0	)
Effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents		2.2			(2.7	)
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents		(139.7	)		(43.2	)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year		542.8			524.4
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	403.1		$	481.2

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

The financial data presented herein is unaudited and should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2017.~~2018.

In our opinion, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include all adjustments, consisting of only normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair statement of the financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods presented. The December 31, ~~2017~~2018 condensed consolidated balance sheet data was derived from audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). Results for interim periods should not be considered indicative of results for the full year.

We have reclassified expenses that were previously recognized in a financial statement line item labeled “Acquisition, quality remediation and other” (and prior to that, labeled “Special items”) to the financial statement line items of “Research and development,” “Selling, general and administrative,” “Intangible asset impairment,” “Acquisition, integration and related,” and “Quality remediation”. Prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation. Please refer to Note 2 for additional details on the reclassified items. We made this change to provide additional transparency and better reflect the nature of these expenses.

The words “we,” “us,” “our” and similar words and “Zimmer Biomet” refer to Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. and its subsidiaries. “Zimmer Biomet Holdings” refers to the parent company only.

We use the financial statement line item “Acquisition, integration and related” to recognize expenses resulting from the consummation of business mergers and acquisitions and the related integration of those businesses. In 2015, we completed our merger with LVB Acquisition, Inc. (“LVB”), the parent company of Biomet, Inc. (“Biomet”) (which merger is sometimes referred to herein as the “Biomet merger”). In 2016, we acquired LDR Holding Corporation and other individually immaterial companies. Acquisition, integration and related expenses are primarily composed of:

We use the financial statement line item “Quality remediation” to recognize expenses related to addressing inspectional observations on Form 483 issued by the FDA following its inspections of our Warsaw North Campus facility, among other matters. The majority of these expenses are related to consultants who are helping us to update previous documents and redesign certain processes.

In ~~August 2017,~~February 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standard Update (“ASU”) 2017-12 – Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities. This ASU amends the hedge accounting guidance to simplify the application of hedge accounting, makes more financial and nonfinancial hedging strategies eligible for hedge accounting treatment, changes how companies assess effectiveness and updates presentation and disclosure requirements. We early adopted this ASU in the first quarter of 2018. Based upon our hedging portfolio that existed prior to adoption, the adoption of this ASU did not have any impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows. However, after adoption we entered into cross-currency interest rate swaps that we designated as net investment hedges. Under this ASU, we have made a policy election for changes in the fair value of the cross-currency component of the cross-currency interest rate swaps to be recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income. Therefore, all changes in the fair value of the cross-currency interest rate swaps are recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss in the condensed consolidated balance sheet. The portion of this change related to the excluded component will

be amortized into earnings over the life of the derivative while the remainder will be recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss until the hedged net investment is sold or substantially liquidated. ~~Under previous guidance, the fair value change related to the cross-currency component was recognized in earnings. See Note 10 for additional information.~~

In February 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-02 – Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. Under GAAP, when there is a change in tax rates, it requires remeasurement of deferred tax assets and liabilities to be recognized as part of income, even if the deferred tax asset or liability had been recorded and recognized in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) (“AOCI”). As a result, a portion of the amount recognized in AOCI at the previous tax rate would remain stranded in AOCI permanently. ASU 2018-02 allows the stranded tax effects in AOCI related only to the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (“2017 Tax Act”) to be reclassified from AOCI to retained earnings. The only stranded tax effects in AOCI we had related to the 2017 Tax Act were due to changes in the U.S. federal corporate income tax rate. We early adopted this ASU in the first quarter of 2018 and elected to use the beginning of period transition method, which means we recognized the reclassification as of January 1, 2018. As a result, we reclassified $42.9 million from AOCI to retained earnings.

~~In March 2017,~~ ~~the FASB issued ASU 2017-07~~ – Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost. This ASU requires us to report the service cost component of pensions in the same location as other compensation costs arising from services rendered by the pertinent employees during the period. We are required to report the other components of net benefit costs in other income (expense) in the statements of earnings. This ASU was effective for us as of January 1, 2018. This ASU must be applied retrospectively for the presentation of the service cost component and the other components of net periodic pension cost in the statements of earnings and prospectively, on and after the effective date, for the capitalization of the service cost component of net periodic pension cost in assets. This ASU provides a practical expedient that allows companies to use the amounts disclosed in prior financial statements as the basis for the retrospective application. We elected to use this practical expedient. The impacts of this ASU on our condensed consolidated financial statements for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2017 are included in the tables below. See Note 12 for further information on the components of our net benefit cost.

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09 – Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606). This ASU provides a five-step model for revenue recognition that all industries will apply to recognize revenue when a customer obtains control of a good or service. This ASU was effective for us as of January 1, 2018. Entities were permitted to apply the standard and related amendments either retrospectively to each prior reporting period presented or retrospectively with the cumulative effect of initially applying the ASU recognized at the date of initial application. We adopted this new standard using the retrospective method, which resulted in us restating prior reporting periods presented. This ASU did not result in a change to the timing of our revenue recognition. However, we were required to reclassify certain immaterial costs from selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) expense to net sales, which resulted in a reduction of net sales, but had no impact on operating profit or retained earnings. This ASU also required us to reclassify our estimated refund liability for products expected to be returned from a reduction of accounts receivable to other current liabilities and the related right to receive products from the return from inventories to prepaid expenses and other current assets. The impacts of this ASU on our condensed consolidated financial statements for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2017 and as of December 31, 2017 are included in the tables below.

New

New

As

Revenue

Pension

Previously

Standard

Standard

As

(in millions)
Reported

Adjustment

Adjustment

Reclassifications

Restated

Statement of Earnings

Three Months Ended June 30, 2017

Net Sales
$
1,954.4

$
(4.9
)

$
-

$
-

$
1,949.5

Research and development

90.1

-

-

2.5

92.6

Selling, general and administrative

748.0

(4.9
)

2.2

6.9

752.2

Intangible asset impairment

-

-

-

26.8

26.8

Acquisition, integration and related

-

-

-

72.5

72.5

Quality remediation

-

-

-

49.9

49.9

Special items

158.6

-

-

(158.6
)

-

Operating expenses

1,672.1

(4.9
)

2.2

-

1,669.4

Operating Profit

282.3

-

(2.2
)

-

280.1

Other expense, net

(3.9
)

-

2.2

-

(1.7
)

New

New

As

Revenue

Pension

Previously

Standard

Standard

As

(in millions)
Reported

Adjustment

Adjustment

Reclassifications

Restated

Statement of Earnings

Six Months Ended June 30, 2017

Net Sales
$
3,931.7

$
(9.8
)

$
-

$
-

$
3,921.9

Research and development

181.2

-

-

2.5

183.7

Selling, general and administrative

1,508.8

(9.8
)

4.5

24.4

1,527.9

Intangible asset impairment

-

-

-

26.8

26.8

Acquisition, integration and related

-

-

-

130.7

130.7

Quality remediation

-

-

-

84.3

84.3

Special items

268.7

-

-

(268.7
)

-

Operating expenses

3,299.0

(9.8
)

4.5

-

3,293.7

Operating Profit

632.7

-

(4.5
)

-

628.2

Other expense, net

(6.7
)

-

4.5

-

(2.2
)

~~In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU~~ 2016-02 – ~~Leases.~~ Leases (Topic 842). This ASU requires lessees to recognize right-of-use assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet. This ASU ~~will be~~was effective for us ~~beginning~~as of January 1, 2019. ~~Early adoption is permitted. Based on current guidance, this~~This ASU ~~must be adopted using~~required a modified retrospective transition ~~approach~~method that could either be applied at ~~the beginning of~~ the earliest comparative period in the ~~consolidated~~ financial ~~statements.~~statements or the period of adoption. We ~~own most~~elected to use the period of adoption (January 1, 2019) transition method and therefore did not recast prior periods. This ASU allowed for certain practical expedients to make the adoption of the ASU less burdensome. We elected the practical expedients upon transition which permitted us to not reassess lease identification, classification, and initial direct costs under the new standard for leases that commenced prior to the effective date. We also elected not to recognize a right-of-use asset nor a lease liability for leases with an initial term of twelve months or less. Finally, we elected not to separate non-lease components from the leased components in the valuation of our ~~manufacturing facilities, but~~right-of-use asset and lease ~~various office space, vehicles~~liability for all asset classes.

On January 1, 2019, we recognized a right-of-use asset of $274.7 million in other assets and lease liabilities of $62.2 million and $221.2 million in other current liabilities and other ~~less~~long-term liabilities, respectively. No cumulative adjustment to retained earnings was required upon adoption. We do not have any significant assets throughout the world. We have formed our project team and have collected all of our lease agreements from across the organization. We are in the process of abstracting the key terms from these lease agreements to determine the appropriate accounting treatment. We will continue evaluating our leases and the related impact this ASU will have on our consolidated financial statements throughout 2018.finance leases. See Note 7 for additional information.

There are no other recently issued accounting pronouncements that we have not yet adopted that are expected to have a material effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

We recognize revenue when our performance obligations under the terms of a contract with our customer are satisfied. This happens when we transfer control of our products to the customer, which generally occurs upon implantation or when title passes upon shipment. Revenue is measured as the amount of consideration we expect to receive in exchange for transferring our product. Taxes collected from customers and remitted to governmental authorities are excluded from revenues.

We sell product through three principal channels: 1) direct to healthcare institutions, referred to as direct channel accounts; 2) through stocking distributors and healthcare dealers; and 3) directly to dental practices and dental laboratories. The direct channel

accounts represented approximately 80 percent of our net sales in 2017. Through this channel, inventory is generally consigned to sales agents or customers so that products are available when needed for surgical procedures. No revenue is recognized upon the placement of inventory into consignment as we retain the ability to control the inventory. Upon implantation, we issue an invoice and revenue is recognized. Pricing for products is generally predetermined by contracts with customers, agents acting on behalf of customer groups or by government regulatory bodies, depending on the market. Price discounts under group purchasing contracts are generally linked to volume of implant purchases by customer healthcare institutions within a specified group. At negotiated thresholds within a contract buying period, price discounts may increase. Payment terms vary by customer, but are typically less than 90 days.

Sales to stocking distributors, healthcare dealers, dental practices and dental laboratories accounted for approximately 20 percent of our net sales in 2017. With these types of sales, revenue is recognized when control of our product passes to the customer, either upon shipment of the product or in some cases upon implantation of the product. It is our accounting policy to account for shipping and handling activities as a fulfillment cost rather than as an additional promised service. We have contracts with these customers or orders may be placed from available price lists. Payment terms vary by customer, but are typically less than 90 days.

We offer standard warranties to our customers that our products are not defective. These standard warranties are not considered separate performance obligations. In limited circumstances, we offer extended warranties that are separate performance obligations. We have very few contracts that have multiple performance obligations. Since we do not have significant multiple element arrangements and essentially all of our sales are recognized upon implantation of a product or when title passes, very little judgment is required to allocate the transaction price of a contract or determine when control has passed to a customer. Our costs to obtain contracts consist primarily of sales commissions to employees or third party agents that are earned when control of our product passes to the customer. Therefore, sales commissions are expensed as part of selling, general and administrative expenses at the same time revenue is recognized. Accordingly, we do not have significant contract assets, liabilities or future performance obligations.

We offer variable consideration through volume-based discounts, rebates, prompt pay discounts, right of return and other various incentives. If sales incentives may be earned by a customer for purchasing a specified amount of our product, we estimate whether such incentives will be achieved and recognize these incentives as a reduction in revenue in the same period the underlying revenue transaction is recognized. We primarily use the expected value method to estimate incentives. Under the expected value method, we consider the historical experience of similar programs as well as review sales trends on a customer-by-customer basis to estimate what levels of incentives will be earned. Occasionally, products are returned and, accordingly, we maintain an estimated refund liability based upon the expected value method that is recorded as a reduction in revenue.

We analyze sales by three geographies, the Americas, EMEA and Asia Pacific, and by the following product categories: Knees, Hips, S.E.T., Dental, Spine & CMF and Other. As discussed in Note 14, we have seven operating segments that are based upon geography and product categories. The geographic segments include sales of all product categories exclusive of the specific product category operating segments. The geographic operating segments are the Americas, EMEA and Asia Pacific. These three operating segments are our reporting segments. The product category operating segments are Spine, less Asia Pacific; Office Based Technologies; CMF and Dental. The product operating segments do not constitute a reporting segment because they are, individually and on a combined basis, insignificant to our consolidated results.

Our sales analysis differs from our reporting operating segments because the underlying market trends in any particular geography tend to be similar across product categories, we primarily sell the same products in all geographies and the product category operating segments are not individually significant to our consolidated results.

“S.E.T.” refers to our Surgical, Sports Medicine, ~~Foot and Ankle,~~ Extremities and Trauma product category. ~~CMF~~“CMF” refers to our craniomaxillofacial and thoracic products.

We had $38.1 million and $49.3 million of property, plant and equipment included in accounts payable as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively.

In the second quarter of 2019, we entered into an agreement and paid $192.5 million to buy out certain licensing arrangements from an unrelated third party. This new agreement and the related payment replace the variable royalty payments that otherwise would have been due under the terms of previous licensing arrangements through 2029. Under the new agreement, we maintain the rights to the counterparty’s intellectual property provided under the previous licensing arrangements. The $192.5 million payment was recognized as an intangible asset and will be amortized through 2029, which represents the useful life of the intellectual property.

In the second quarter of 2019, we recognized $70.1 million of in-process research and development (“IPR&D”) intangible asset impairment due to the termination of certain IPR&D projects. The termination of these projects is the result of the progress we are making to prioritize our internal research and development portfolio and focus our engineering resources on the opportunities that most closely link to our mission. Since these projects were not a priority, their terminations are not expected to have a significant impact to our future cash flows.

We own most of our manufacturing facilities, but lease various office space, vehicles and other less significant assets throughout the world. Our contracts contain a lease if they convey a right to control the use of an identified asset, either explicitly or implicitly, in exchange for consideration. Our lease contracts are a necessary part of our business, but we do not believe they are significant to our overall operations. We do not have any significant finance leases. Additionally, we do not have significant leases: where we are considered a lessor; where we sublease our assets; with an initial term of twelve months or less; with related parties; with residual value guarantees; that impose restrictions or covenants on us; or that have not yet commenced, but create significant rights and obligations against us.

Our real estate leases generally have terms of between 5 to 10 years and contain lease extension options that can vary from month-to-month extensions to up to 5 year extensions. We include extension options in our lease term if we are reasonably certain to exercise that option. In determining whether an extension is reasonably certain, we consider the uniqueness of the property for our needs, the availability of similar properties, whether the extension period payments remain the same or may change due to market rates or fixed price increases in the contract, and other economic factors. Our vehicle leases generally have terms of between 3 to 5 years and contain lease extension options on a month-to-month basis. Our vehicle leases are generally not reasonably certain to be extended.

Under GAAP, we are required to discount our lease liabilities to present value using the rate implicit in the lease, or our incremental borrowing rate for a similar term as the lease term if the implicit rate is not readily available. We generally do not have adequate information to know the implicit rate in a lease and therefore use our incremental borrowing rate. Under GAAP, the incremental borrowing rate must be on a collateralized basis, but our debt arrangements are unsecured. We have determined our incremental borrowing rate by using our credit rating to estimate our unsecured borrowing rate and applying reasonable assumptions to reduce the unsecured rate for a risk adjustment effect from collateral.

Under GAAP, since we adopted the new standard using the period of adoption transition method (see Note 2 for additional information regarding the new standard), we are not required to present 2018 comparative disclosures. However, we are required to present the required annual disclosures under the previous GAAP lease accounting standard. Accordingly, the following were the future minimum rental commitments under non-cancelable operating leases as of December 31, 2018 (in millions):

~~In the fourth quarter of 2016, we executed~~We have receivables purchase arrangements with unrelated third parties to liquidate portions of our trade accounts receivable balance. The receivables relate to products sold to customers and are short-term in nature. The factorings ~~were~~are treated as sales of our accounts receivable. Proceeds from the transfers reflect either the face value of the accounts receivable or the face value less factoring fees.

In the U.S. and Japan, our programs are executed on a revolving basis with a maximum funding limit as of June 30, ~~2018~~2019 of ~~$400 million.~~$400.0 million combined. We act as the collection agent on behalf of the third party, but have no significant retained interests or servicing liabilities related to the accounts receivable sold. In order to mitigate credit risk, we purchased credit insurance for the factored accounts receivable. As a result, our risk of loss is limited to the factored accounts receivable not covered by the insurance. Additionally, we have provided guarantees for the factored accounts receivable. The maximum exposures to loss associated with these arrangements were ~~$30.5~~$33.5 million and ~~$22.9~~$33.0 million as of June 30, ~~2018~~2019 and December 31, ~~2017,~~2018, respectively.

In Europe, we sell to a third party and have no continuing involvement or significant risk with the factored accounts receivable.

Funds received from the transfers are recorded as an increase to cash and a reduction to accounts receivable outstanding in the condensed consolidated balance sheets. We report the cash flows attributable to the sale of receivables to third parties in cash flows from operating activities in our condensed consolidated statements of cash flows. Net expenses resulting from the sales of receivables are recognized in selling, general and administrative expense. Net expenses include any resulting gains or losses from the sales of receivables, credit insurance and factoring fees.

In the six month periods ended June 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017,~~2018, we sold receivables having an aggregate face value of ~~$1,260.7~~$1,595.9 million and ~~$582.7~~$1,260.7 million to third parties in exchange for cash proceeds of ~~$1,260.1~~$1,594.9 million and ~~$582.3~~$1,260.1 million, respectively. Expenses recognized on these sales during the six month periods ended June 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017~~2018 were not significant. In the six month periods ended June 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017,~~2018, under the U.S. and Japan programs, we collected ~~$1,007.8~~$1,438.3 million and ~~$314.0~~$1,007.8 million, respectively, from our customers and remitted that amount to the third party, and we effectively repurchased ~~$121.0~~$73.9 million and ~~$31.0~~$121.0 million, respectively, of previously sold accounts receivable from the third party, due to the programs’ revolving nature. As of June 30, ~~2018~~2019 and December 31, ~~2017,~~2018, we had collected ~~$40.6~~$41.2 million and ~~$103.5~~$66.8 million, respectively, of funds that were unremitted to the third party, which are reflected in our condensed consolidated balance sheets under other current liabilities. The initial collection of cash from customers and its remittance to the third party is reflected in net cash provided by/(used in) financing activities in our condensed consolidated statements of cash flows. ~~We estimate the incremental operating cash inflows related to all of our receivables purchase programs were approximately $30 million in the six month period ended June 30, 2018.~~

At June 30, ~~2018~~2019 and December 31, ~~2017,~~2018, the outstanding principal amount of receivables that has been derecognized under the U.S. and Japan revolving arrangements amounted to ~~$338.9~~$378.1 million and ~~$261.2~~$365.9 million, respectively.

	June 30,			December 31,			June 30,			December 31,
	2018			2017			2019			2018
Current portion of long-term debt
2.000% Senior Notes due 2018	$	-		$	1,150.0
4.625% Senior Notes due 2019							$	500.0		$	500.0
2.700% Senior Notes due 2020								1,500.0			-
U.S. Term Loan B		75.0			75.0			-			25.0
Multicurrency Revolving Facility		25.0			-
Total current portion of long-term debt	$	100.0		$	1,225.0		$	2,000.0		$	525.0
Long-term debt
4.625% Senior Notes due 2019	$	500.0		$	500.0
2.700% Senior Notes due 2020		1,500.0			1,500.0		$	-		$	1,500.0
Floating Rate Notes due 2021		450.0		-				450.0			450.0
3.375% Senior Notes due 2021		300.0			300.0			300.0			300.0
3.150% Senior Notes due 2022		750.0			750.0			750.0			750.0
3.700% Senior Notes due 2023		300.0		-				300.0			300.0
3.550% Senior Notes due 2025		2,000.0			2,000.0			2,000.0			2,000.0
4.250% Senior Notes due 2035		253.4			253.4			253.4			253.4
5.750% Senior Notes due 2039		317.8			317.8			317.8			317.8
4.450% Senior Notes due 2045		395.4			395.4			395.4			395.4
1.414% Euro Notes due 2022		583.8			600.4			569.4			571.6
2.425% Euro Notes due 2026		583.8			600.4			569.4			571.6
U.S. Term Loan A		610.0			835.0
U.S. Term Loan B		600.0			600.0			-			200.0
U.S. Term Loan C								535.0			535.0
Japan Term Loan A		105.9			103.2			108.7			105.3
Japan Term Loan B		192.8			187.9			197.9			191.7
Other long-term debt		3.9			4.1
Debt discount and issuance costs		(52.4	)		(53.2	)		(38.1	)		(42.7	)
Adjustment related to interest rate swaps		18.9			23.1			10.4			14.6
Total long-term debt	$	9,413.3		$	8,917.5		$	6,719.3		$	8,413.7

At June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, our total current and non-current debt ~~balance~~of $8.7 billion consisted of ~~$7.9~~$7.9 billion aggregate principal amount of our senior notes, which included ~~$1.2~~$1.1 billion of Euro-denominated senior notes (“Euro Notes”), ~~$610.0~~$535.0 million outstanding under a U.S. term loan (“U.S. Term Loan

A” C”) that will mature on ~~June 24,~~December 14, 2020, ~~$675.0million outstanding under a U.S. term loan (“U.S. Term Loan B”) that will mature on September 30, 2019,~~ an11.7 billion Japanese Yen term loan agreement (“Japan Term Loan A”) and a 21.3 billion Japanese Yen term loan agreement (“Japan Term Loan B”) that will each mature on September 27, 2022, ~~$25.0 million outstanding under the Multicurrency Revolving Facility (defined below) and other debt~~ and fair value adjustments totaling$~~22.8~~10.4 million, partially offset by debt discount and issuance costs of ~~$52.4~~$38.1 million.

On December 14, 2018, we entered into a credit agreement (the “2018 Credit Agreement”) that provides for U.S. Term Loan C, which is a two-year unsecured multi-draw term loan facility in the principal amount of $900.0 million, with a maturity date of December 14, 2020, and borrowed $675.0 million under that facility. In January 2019, we borrowed an additional $200.0 million under U.S. Term Loan C and used those proceeds, along with cash on hand, to repay the remaining $225.0 million outstanding under a U.S. term loan issued under the 2016 Credit Agreement (as defined below) (“U.S. Term Loan B”). Under the applicable accounting rules, since $200.0 million of U.S. Term Loan B was refinanced on a long-term basis before the issuance of our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2018, we classified the refinanced portion of U.S. Term Loan B as long-term as of December 31, 2018.

On March 19, 2018, we completed the offering of $450.0 million aggregate principal amount of our floating rate senior notes due March 19, 2021 and $300.0 million aggregate principal amount of our 3.700% senior notes due March 19, 2023. Interest on the floating rate senior notes is equal to three-month LIBOR plus 0.750% and is payable quarterly, commencing on June 19, 2018, until maturity. Interest is payable on the 3.700% senior notes semi-annually, commencing on September 19, 2018, until maturity. We received net proceeds of $749.5 million from this offering. ~~On April 2,~~

In addition to the 2018 ~~these proceeds, together with borrowings under the Multicurrency Revolving Facility (as defined below) and cash on hand, were used to repay the 2.000% Senior Notes due 2018.~~

~~On September 22, 2017,~~Credit Agreement, we entered into a term loan agreement for the Japan Term Loan B, and an amended and restated term loan agreement, which amended and restated the Japan Term Loan A loan agreement dated as of May 24, 2012, as amended as of October 31, 2014. As described above, the term loans under both of these agreements will mature on September 27, 2022. Each of these term loans bears interest at a fixed rate of 0.635% per annum.

We have a revolving credit and term loan agreement (the “2016 Credit Agreement”) ~~and a first amendment to our credit agreement executed in 2014 (the “2014 Credit Agreement”). The 2016 Credit Agreement~~, which contains ~~the U.S. Term Loan B and~~ a five-year unsecured multicurrency revolving facility of $1.5 billion (the “Multicurrency Revolving Facility”)., and previously contained U.S. Term Loan B, which was paid in full during the six month period ended June 30, 2019. The Multicurrency Revolving Facility replaced the previous multicurrency revolving facility under our credit agreement executed in 2014 (as amended,

the ~~2014~~“2014 Credit ~~Agreement~~Agreement”) and will mature on September 30, 2021, with two available one-year extensions at our discretion. The 2014 Credit Agreement ~~also provided for the~~ previously contained a term loan (“U.S. Term Loan A,A”), which ~~remains~~was paid in ~~effect.~~full in December 2018.

Borrowings under the ~~2014~~2018 and 2016 Credit Agreements generally bear interest at floating rates. We pay a facility fee on the aggregate amount of the Multicurrency Revolving Facility. The 2018 and 2016 Credit Agreements contain customary affirmative and negative covenants and events of default for unsecured financing arrangements, including, among other things, limitations on consolidations, mergers and sales of assets. If our credit rating falls below investment grade, additional restrictions would result, including restrictions on investments and payment of dividends. We were in compliance with all ~~financial~~ covenants under the ~~2014~~2018 and 2016 Credit Agreements as of June 30, ~~2018.~~2019. As of June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, we had ~~$25.0 million of~~no borrowings outstanding under the Multicurrency Revolving Facility.

During the six month period ended June 30, 2019, we repaid $200.0 million on U.S. Term Loan C with cash generated from operations. Under the terms of U.S. Term Loan ~~A, we have~~C, the ~~ability to prepay principal without penalty. We have paid $2.39 billion in principal under U.S. Term Loan A, resulting in $610.0 million in outstanding borrowings~~remaining balance as of June 30, ~~2018. Of the outstanding balance, $197.5~~2019 of $535.0 million is ~~due March 31, 2020 and $412.5 million is due June 30, 2020.~~

~~Under the terms of U.S. Term Loan B, future principal payments are due as follows: $75.0 million on September 30, 2018, with the remaining balance~~ due on the maturity date of ~~September 30, 2019. We have paid $75.0 million in principal under U.S. Term Loan B, resulting in $675.0 million outstanding on the U.S. Term Loan B as of June 30, 2018.~~December 14, 2020.

The estimated fair value of our senior notes as of June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, based on quoted prices for the specific securities from transactions in over-the-counter markets (Level 2), was ~~$7,864.8~~$8,126.5 million. The estimated fair value of Japan Term Loan A and Japan Term Loan B, in the aggregate, as of June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, based upon publicly available market yield curves and the terms of the debt (Level 2), was ~~$297.4~~$303.1 million. The carrying ~~values~~value of U.S. Term Loan ~~A, U.S. Term Loan B and the Multicurrency Revolving Facility approximate their~~C approximates its fair ~~values~~value as ~~they bear~~it bears interest at short-term variable market rates.

~~AOCI~~Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (“AOCI”) refers to certain gains and losses that under GAAP are included in comprehensive income but are excluded from net earnings as these amounts are initially recorded as an adjustment to stockholders’ equity. Amounts in AOCI may be reclassified to net earnings upon the occurrence of certain events.

Our AOCI is comprised of foreign currency translation adjustments, unrealized gains and losses on cash flow hedges and amortization of prior service costs and unrecognized gains and losses in actuarial assumptions on our defined benefit plans. Foreign currency translation adjustments are reclassified to net earnings upon sale or upon a complete or substantially complete liquidation of an investment in a foreign entity. Unrealized gains and losses on cash flow hedges are reclassified to net earnings when the hedged item affects net earnings. Amounts related to defined benefit plans that are in AOCI are reclassified over the service periods of employees in the plan.

The following table shows the changes in the components of AOCI, net of tax (in millions):

The following table shows the reclassification adjustments from AOCI (in millions):

	Amount of Gain (Loss)													Amount of Gain (Loss)
	Reclassified from AOCI													Reclassified from AOCI
	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended							Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,						Location on	June 30,						June 30,						Location on
Component of AOCI	2018			2017			2018			2017			Statements of Earnings	2019			2018			2019			2018			Statements of Earnings
Cash flow hedges
Foreign exchange forward contracts	$	(10.5	)	$	5.9		$	(21.6	)	$	17.0		Cost of products sold	$	7.4		$	(10.5	)	$	14.5		$	(21.6	)	Cost of products sold
Interest rate swaps															-			-			2.8			-		Interest expense, net
Forward starting interest rate swaps		(0.2	)		(0.2	)		(0.3	)		(0.3	)	Interest expense		(0.2	)		(0.2	)		(0.3	)		(0.3	)	Interest expense, net
		(10.7	)		5.7			(21.9	)		16.7		Total before tax		7.2			(10.7	)		17.0			(21.9	)	Total before tax
		(1.5	)		1.2			(3.0	)		3.2		Provision for income taxes		1.0			(1.5	)		2.6			(3.0	)	Provision for income taxes
	$	(9.2	)	$	4.5		$	(18.9	)	$	13.5		Net of tax	$	6.2		$	(9.2	)	$	14.4		$	(18.9	)	Net of tax
Defined benefit plans
Prior service cost	$	2.5		$	2.5		$	5.0		$	5.1		Other expense, net	$	1.9		$	2.5		$	3.7		$	5.0		Other expense, net
Unrecognized actuarial (loss)		(6.7	)		(5.2	)		(12.8	)		(10.8	)	Other expense, net
Unrecognized actuarial loss															(5.5	)		(6.7	)		(10.8	)		(12.8	)	Other expense, net
		(4.2	)		(2.7	)		(7.8	)		(5.7	)	Total before tax		(3.6	)		(4.2	)		(7.1	)		(7.8	)	Total before tax
		(1.2	)		(1.1	)		(2.0	)		(2.3	)	Benefit for income taxes		(1.2	)		(1.2	)		(2.7	)		(2.0	)	Provision for income taxes
	$	(3.0	)	$	(1.6	)	$	(5.8	)	$	(3.4	)	Net of tax	$	(2.4	)	$	(3.0	)	$	(4.4	)	$	(5.8	)	Net of tax
Total reclassifications	$	(12.2	)	$	2.9		$	(24.7	)	$	10.1		Net of tax	$	3.8		$	(12.2	)	$	10.0		$	(24.7	)	Net of tax

The following table shows the tax effects on each component of AOCI recognized in our condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive income (in millions):

Three Months Ended June 30, 2018

Six Months Ended June 30, 2018

Before Tax

Tax

Net of Tax

Before Tax

Tax

Net of Tax

Foreign currency cumulative translation adjustments

$
(192.0
)

$
(14.2
)

$
(177.8
)

$
(90.6
)

$
(7.6
)

$
(83.0
)
Unrealized cash flow hedge (losses)

62.7

11.1

51.6

29.6

4.4

25.2

Reclassification adjustments on cash flow hedges

10.7

1.5

9.2

21.9

3.0

18.9

Adjustments to prior service cost and unrecognized
actuarial assumptions

4.1

(1.2
)

5.3

-

(2.0
)

2.0

Total Other Comprehensive Loss

$
(114.5
)

$
(2.8
)

$
(111.7
)

$
(39.1
)

$
(2.2
)

$
(36.9
)

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2019									Six Months Ended June 30, 2019
	Before Tax			Tax			Net of Tax			Before Tax			Tax			Net of Tax
Foreign currency cumulative translation adjustments	$	8.1		$	(7.0	)	$	15.1		$	16.0		$	5.3		$	10.7
Unrealized cash flow hedge (losses) gains		(3.9	)		(4.3	)		0.4			12.8			(2.1	)		14.9
Reclassification adjustments on cash flow hedges		(7.2	)		(1.0	)		(6.2	)		(17.0	)		(2.6	)		(14.4	)
Adjustments to prior service cost and unrecognized actuarial assumptions		3.6			1.2			2.4			7.1			2.7			4.4
Total Other Comprehensive Income	$	0.6		$	(11.1	)	$	11.7		$	18.9		$	3.3		$	15.6

Three Months Ended June 30, 2017

Six Months Ended June 30, 2017

Before Tax

Tax

Net of Tax

Before Tax

Tax

Net of Tax

Foreign currency cumulative translation adjustments

$
215.3

$
26.1

$
189.2

$
269.7

$
31.5

$
238.2

Unrealized cash flow hedge (losses)

(26.5
)

(1.7
)

(24.8
)

(63.1
)

(12.0
)

(51.1
)
Reclassification adjustments on cash flow hedges

(5.7
)

(1.2
)

(4.5
)

(16.7
)

(3.2
)

(13.5
)
Adjustments to prior service cost and unrecognized
actuarial assumptions

0.2

0.7

(0.5
)

(3.5
)

0.5

(4.0
)
Total Other Comprehensive Income

$
183.3

$
23.9

$
159.4

$
186.4

$
16.8

$
169.6

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2018									Six Months Ended June 30, 2018
	Before Tax			Tax			Net of Tax			Before Tax			Tax			Net of Tax
Foreign currency cumulative translation adjustments	$	(192.0	)	$	(14.2	)	$	(177.8	)	$	(90.6	)	$	(7.6	)	$	(83.0	)
Unrealized cash flow hedge gains		62.7			11.1			51.6			29.6			4.4			25.2
Reclassification adjustments on cash flow hedges		10.7			1.5			9.2			21.9			3.0			18.9
Adjustments to prior service cost and unrecognized actuarial assumptions		4.1			(1.2	)		5.3			-			(2.0	)		2.0
Total Other Comprehensive Loss	$	(114.5	)	$	(2.8	)	$	(111.7	)	$	(39.1	)	$	(2.2	)	$	(36.9	)

The following financial assets and liabilities are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis (in millions):

	As of June 30, 2018								As of June 30, 2019
			Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using:								Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using:
Description	Recorded Balance		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Recorded Balance		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Assets
Derivatives, current and long-term
Foreign currency forward contracts	$	9.9	$	-	$	9.9	$	-	$	42.7	$	-	$	42.7	$	-
Interest rate swaps		37.2		-		37.2		-		31.8		-		31.8		-
Total Assets	$	47.1	$	-	$	47.1	$	-	$	74.5	$	-	$	74.5	$	-

Liabilities
Derivatives, current and long-term
Foreign currency forward contracts	$	10.9	$	-	$	10.9	$	-	$	0.6	$	-	$	0.6	$	-
Interest rate swaps		1.2		-		1.2		-
Contingent payments related to acquisitions		23.5		-		-		23.5
Total Liabilities	$	35.6	$	-	$	12.1	$	23.5	$	0.6	$	-	$	0.6	$	-

	As of December 31, 2017								As of December 31, 2018
			Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using:								Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using:
Description	Recorded Balance		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Recorded Balance		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Assets
Derivatives, current and long-term
Foreign currency forward contracts	$	1.6	$	-	$	1.6	$	-	$	45.7	$	-	$	45.7	$	-
Interest rate swaps		4.5		-		4.5		-		17.9		-		17.9		-
Total Assets	$	6.1	$	-	$	6.1	$	-	$	63.6	$	-	$	63.6	$	-

Liabilities
Derivatives, current and long-term
Foreign currency forward contracts	$	50.9	$	-	$	50.9	$	-	$	0.5	$	-	$	0.5	$	-
Contingent payments related to acquisitions		41.0		-		-		41.0
Interest rate swaps										2.5		-		2.5		-
Total Liabilities	$	91.9	$	-	$	50.9	$	41.0	$	3.0	$	-	$	3.0	$	-

We value our foreign currency forward contracts using a market approach based on foreign currency exchange rates obtained from active markets, and we perform ongoing assessments of counterparty credit risk.

We value our interest rate swaps using a market approach based on publicly available market yield curves, foreign currency exchange rates and the terms of our swaps, and we perform ongoing assessments of counterparty credit risk.

Contingent payments related to acquisitions consist of commercial milestone, cost savings and sales-based payments, and are valued using discounted cash flow techniques. The fair value of commercial milestone payments reflects management’s expectations of probability of payment, and increases as the probability of payment increases or expectation of timing of payments is accelerated. The fair value of cost savings and sales-based payments is based upon probability-weighted future cost savings and revenue estimates, and increases as cost savings and revenue estimates increase, probability weighting of higher cost savings and revenue scenarios increase or expectation of timing of payment is accelerated.

The following table provides a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of items measured at fair value on a recurring basis in the tables above that used significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) (in millions):

~~Changes in estimates are recognized in Acquisition, integration and related on our condensed consolidated statement of earnings.~~

We are exposed to certain market risks relating to our ongoing business operations, including foreign currency exchange rate risk, commodity price risk, interest rate risk and credit risk. We manage our exposure to these and other market risks through regular operating and financing activities. Currently, the only risks that we manage through the use of derivative instruments are interest rate risk and foreign currency exchange rate risk.

In prior years, we entered into various fixed-to-variable interest rate swap agreements that were accounted for as fair value hedges of a portion of our 4.625% Senior Notes due 2019 and all of our 3.375% Senior Notes due 2021. In August 2016, we received cash for these interest rate swap assets by terminating the hedging instruments with the counterparties. The remaining unamortized balance as of June 30, ~~2018~~2019 related to these discontinued hedges was ~~$18.9~~$10.4 million, which will be recognized using the effective interest rate method over the remaining maturity period of the hedged notes. As of June 30, ~~2018~~2019 and December 31, ~~2017,~~2018, the following amounts were recorded on our condensed consolidated balance sheets related to cumulative basis adjustments for fair value hedges (in millions):

In 2014, we entered into forward starting interest rate swaps that were designated as cash flow hedges of our thirty-year tranche of senior notes (the 4.450% Senior Notes due 2045) we expected to issue in 2015. The forward starting interest rate swaps mitigated the risk of changes in interest rates prior to the completion of the offering of senior notes in connection with our merger with LVB Acquisition, Inc., the parent company of Biomet, ~~merger.~~Inc. (“Biomet”) (which merger is sometimes referred to herein as the “Biomet merger”). The interest rate swaps were settled, and the remaining loss to be recognized at June 30, ~~2018~~2019 was ~~$27.4~~$26.8 million, which will be recognized using the effective interest rate method over the remaining maturity period of the hedged notes.

In September 2016, we entered into various variable-to-fixed interest rate swap agreements with a notional amount of $375.0 million that were accounted for as cash flow hedges of U.S. Term Loan B. The interest rate swaps ~~minimize~~minimized the exposure to changes in the LIBOR interest rates while the variable-rate debt iswas outstanding. ~~The weighted average fixed~~In the first quarter of 2019, we terminated these interest rate ~~for all~~swaps concurrently with the repayment of the ~~swaps executed is approximately 0.82 percent through September 30, 2019.~~ remaining balance of U.S. Term Loan B, and we recognized proceeds and interest income of $2.8 million related to the termination.

We operate on a global basis and are exposed to the risk that our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows could be adversely affected by changes in foreign currency exchange rates. To reduce the potential effects of foreign currency exchange rate movements on net earnings, we enter into derivative financial instruments in the form of foreign currency exchange forward contracts with major financial institutions. We also designated our Euro Notes as net investment hedges of investments in foreign subsidiaries. We are primarily exposed to foreign currency exchange rate risk with respect to transactions and net assets denominated in Euros,

Swiss Francs, Japanese Yen, British Pounds, Canadian Dollars, Australian Dollars, Korean Won, Swedish Krona, Czech Koruna, Thai Baht, Taiwan Dollars, South African Rand, Russian Rubles, Indian Rupees, Turkish Lira, Polish Zloty, Danish Krone, and Norwegian Krone. We do not use derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes.

We are exposed to the impact of foreign exchange rate fluctuations in the investments in our wholly-owned foreign subsidiaries that are denominated in currencies other than the U.S. Dollar. In order to mitigate the volatility in foreign exchange rates, we issued Euro Notes in December 2016 and designated 100 percent of the Euro Notes to hedge our net investment in certain wholly-owned foreign subsidiaries that have a functional currency of the Euro. All changes in the fair value of a hedging instrument designated as a net investment hedge are recorded as a component of AOCI in the condensed consolidated balance sheets.

~~In the first quarter of 2018,~~At June 30, 2019, we ~~initiated~~had receive-fixed-rate, pay-fixed-rate cross-currency interest ~~rate~~ swaps with a notional ~~amount~~amounts outstanding of ~~€500.0 million. In the second quarter of 2018, we initiated additional receive-fixed-rate, pay-fixed-rate cross-currency interest rate swaps with a notional amount of €500.0~~Euro 1,450 million, Japanese Yen 7 billion and Swiss Franc 50 million. These transactions further ~~hedged~~hedge our net investment in certain wholly-owned foreign subsidiaries that have a functional currency of ~~Euro.~~Euro, Japanese Yen and Swiss Franc. All changes in the fair value of a derivative instrument designated as a net investment hedge are recorded as a component of AOCI in the condensed consolidated balance sheets. The portion of this change related to the excluded component will be amortized into earnings over the life of the derivative while the remainder will be recorded in AOCI until the hedged net investment is sold or substantially liquidated.

We recognize the excluded component in interest expense, net on our condensed consolidated statements of earnings. The ~~gains~~net cash received related to the ~~excluded~~receive-fixed-rate, pay-fixed-rate component ~~were not significant for~~of the ~~period.~~

~~In the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2018, we recognized foreign exchange gains~~cross-currency interest rate swaps is reflected in investing cash flows in our condensed consolidated statements of $91.1 million and $64.7 million, respectively, in AOCI in foreign currency translation adjustments on our net investment hedges. In the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2017, we recognized foreign exchange losses of $71.0 million and $85.8 million, respectively, in AOCI in foreign currency translation adjustments on our net investment hedges. We did not reclassify any amount from AOCI to earnings in the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017. cash flows.

Our revenues are generated in various currencies throughout the world. However, a significant amount of our inventory is produced in U.S. Dollars. Therefore, movements in foreign currency exchange rates may have different proportional effects on our revenues compared to our cost of products sold. To minimize the effects of foreign currency exchange rate movements on cash flows, we hedge intercompany sales of inventory expected to occur within the next 30 months with foreign currency exchange forward contracts. We designate these derivative instruments as cash flow hedges.

We perform quarterly assessments of hedge effectiveness by verifying and documenting the critical terms of the hedge instrument and confirming that forecasted transactions have not changed significantly. We also assess on a quarterly basis whether there have been adverse developments regarding the risk of a counterparty default. ~~Under ASU 2017-12 for~~For derivatives which qualify as hedges of future cash flows, the gains and losses are temporarily recorded in AOCI and then recognized in cost of products sold when the hedged item affects net earnings. On our condensed consolidated statements of cash flows, the settlements of these cash flow hedges are recognized in operating cash flows.

For foreign currency exchange forward contracts and options outstanding at June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, we had obligations to purchase U.S. Dollars and sell Euros, Japanese Yen, British Pounds, Canadian Dollars, Australian Dollars, Korean Won, Swedish Krona, Czech Koruna, Thai Baht, Taiwan Dollars, South African Rand, Russian Rubles, Indian Rupees, ~~Turkish Lira,~~ Polish Zloty, Danish Krone, and Norwegian Krone and obligations to purchase Swiss Francs and sell U.S. Dollars. These derivatives mature at dates ranging from July ~~2018~~2019 through ~~December 2020.~~November 2021. As of June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, the notional amounts of outstanding forward contracts and options entered into with third parties to purchase U.S. Dollars were ~~$1,608.9~~$1,535.1 million. As of June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, the notional amounts of outstanding forward contracts and options entered into with third parties to purchase Swiss Francs were ~~$264.2~~$270.7 million.

We enter into foreign currency forward exchange contracts with terms of one month to manage currency exposures for monetary assets and liabilities denominated in a currency other than an entity’s functional currency. As a result, any foreign currency re-measurement gains/losses recognized in earnings are generally offset with gains/losses on the foreign currency forward exchange contracts in the same reporting period. The net amount of these offsetting gains/losses is recorded in ~~Other expense.~~other expense, net. These contracts are settled on the last day of each reporting period. Therefore, there is no outstanding balance related to these contracts recorded on the balance sheet as of the end of the reporting period. The notional amounts of these contracts are typically in a range of $1.5 billion to $2.0 billion per quarter.

Derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges had the following effects, before taxes, on AOCI and ~~Net~~net earnings on our condensed consolidated statements of earnings, condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive income and condensed consolidated balance sheets (in millions):

	Amount of Gain (Loss)												Amount of Gain (Loss)												Amount of Gain (Loss)											Amount of Gain (Loss)
	Recognized in AOCI												Reclassified from AOCI												Recognized in AOCI											Reclassified from AOCI
	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended						Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended						Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended					Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,					Location on	June 30,						June 30,						June 30,						June 30,				Location on	June 30,						June 30,
Derivative Instrument	2018			2017			2018		2017			Statements of Earnings	2018			2017			2018			2017			2019			2018			2019		2018		Statements of Earnings	2019			2018			2019			2018
Foreign exchange forward contracts	$	63.7		$	(25.9	)	$	29.5	$	(63.1	)	Cost of products sold	$	(10.5	)	$	5.9		$	(21.6	)	$	17.0		$	(3.9	)	$	63.7		$	12.8	$	29.5	Cost of products sold	$	7.4		$	(10.5	)	$	14.5		$	(21.6	)
Interest rate swaps		(1.0	)		(0.6	)		0.1		-		Interest expense		-			-			-			-			-			(1.0	)		-		0.1	Interest expense, net		-			-			2.8			-
Forward starting interest rate swaps		-			-			-		-		Interest expense		(0.2	)		(0.2	)		(0.3	)		(0.3	)		-			-			-		-	Interest expense, net		(0.2	)		(0.2	)		(0.3	)		(0.3	)
	$	62.7		$	(26.5	)	$	29.6	$	(63.1	)		$	(10.7	)	$	5.7		$	(21.9	)	$	16.7		$	(3.9	)	$	62.7		$	12.8	$	29.6		$	7.2		$	(10.7	)	$	17.0		$	(21.9	)

The net amounts recognized in earnings during the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 due to ineffectiveness and amounts excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness were not significant. 17

The fair value of outstanding derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges and recorded on our condensed consolidated balance sheet at June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, together with settled derivatives where the hedged item has not yet affected earnings, was a net unrealized ~~loss~~gain of ~~$32.9~~$19.2 million, or ~~$26.8~~$21.4 million after taxes, which is deferred in AOCI. A ~~loss~~gain of ~~$10.7~~$35.0 million, or ~~$9.3~~$30.2 million after taxes, is expected to be reclassified to earnings in cost of products sold and a loss of $0.6 million, or ~~$0.4~~$0.5 million after taxes, is expected to be reclassified to earnings in interest expense, net over the next twelve months.

The following table presents the effect of fair value and cash flow hedge accounting on our condensed consolidated statements of earnings (in millions):

	Location and Amount of Gain/(Loss) Recognized in Income on Fair Value and Cash Flow Hedging Relationships for the Period Ended:																						Location and Amount of Gain/(Loss) Recognized in Income on Fair Value and Cash Flow Hedging Relationships for the Period Ended:
	Three Months Ended						Three Months Ended					Six Months Ended						Six Months Ended					Three Months Ended					Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended					Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2018						June 30, 2017					June 30, 2018						June 30, 2017					June 30, 2019					June 30, 2018						June 30, 2019					June 30, 2018
	Cost of						Cost of					Cost of						Cost of					Cost of		Interest			Cost of			Interest			Cost of					Cost of
	Goods			Interest			Goods		Interest			Goods			Interest			Goods		Interest			Goods		Expense,			Goods			Expense,			Goods		Interest			Goods			Interest
	Sold			Expense			Sold		Expense			Sold			Expense			Sold		Expense			Sold		Net			Sold			Net			Sold		Expense			Sold			Expense
Total amounts of income and expense line items presented in the statements of earnings in which the effects of fair value or cash flow hedges are recorded	$	583.7		$	(75.9	)	$	527.7	$	(82.3	)	$	1,159.5		$	(154.8	)	$	1,040.6	$	(165.2	)	$	581.3	$	(59.7	)	$	583.7		$	(75.3	)	$	1,134.7	$	(117.7	)	$	1,159.5		$	(153.3	)
The effects of fair value and cash flow hedging:
Gain (loss) on fair value hedging relationships
Gain on fair value hedging relationships
Discontinued interest rate swaps		-			2.1			-		2.1			-			4.2			-		4.1			-		2.1			-			2.1			-		4.2			-			4.2
Gain (loss) on cash flow hedging relationships
Foreign exchange forward contracts																								7.4		-			(10.5	)		-			14.5		-			(21.6	)		-
Interest rate swaps																								-		-			-			-			-		2.8			-			-
Forward starting interest rate swaps		-			(0.2	)		-		(0.2	)		-			(0.3	)		-		(0.3	)		-		(0.2	)		-			(0.2	)		-		(0.3	)		-			(0.3	)
Foreign exchange forward contracts		(10.5	)		-			5.9		-			(21.6	)		-			17.0		-
Gain on net investment hedging relationships
Cross-currency interest rate swaps																								-		13.4			-			5.1			-		25.4			-			5.2

The following gains and (losses) from these derivative instruments were recognized on our condensed consolidated statements of earnings (in millions):

These ~~gains and~~ gains/losses do not reflect offsetting gains of $1.3 million and $1.9 million in the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2019, respectively, and offsetting losses of $32.9 million and $29.0 million in the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2018, respectively, ~~and offsetting gains of $6.3 million and $31.9 million in the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2017, respectively,~~ recognized in ~~Other~~other expense, net as a result of foreign currency re-measurement of monetary assets and liabilities denominated in a currency other than an entity’s functional currency.

As of June 30, ~~2018~~2019 and December 31, ~~2017,~~2018, all derivative instruments designated as fair value hedges, ~~and~~ cash flow hedges and net investment hedges were recorded at fair value on our condensed consolidated balance sheets. On our condensed consolidated balance sheets, we recognize individual forward contracts and options with the same counterparty on a net asset/liability basis if we have a master netting agreement with the counterparty. Under these master netting agreements, we are able to settle derivative instrument assets and liabilities with the same counterparty in a single transaction, instead of settling each derivative instrument separately. We have master netting agreements with all of our counterparties. The fair value of derivative instruments on a gross basis is as follows (in millions):

The table below presents the effects of our master netting agreements on our condensed consolidated balance sheets (in millions):

		As of June 30, 2018						As of December 31, 2017							As of June 30, 2019						As of December 31, 2018
Description	Location	Gross Amount		Offset		Net Amount in Balance Sheet		Gross Amount		Offset		Net Amount in Balance Sheet		Location	Gross Amount		Offset		Net Amount in Balance Sheet		Gross Amount		Offset		Net Amount in Balance Sheet
Asset Derivatives
Cash flow hedges	Other current assets	$	15.0	$	8.7	$	6.3	$	14.5	$	13.4	$	1.1	Other current assets	$	42.0	$	8.3	$	33.7	$	37.9	$	9.6	$	28.3
Cash flow hedges	Other assets		7.9		4.3		3.6		4.8		4.3		0.5	Other assets		12.5		3.5		9.0		20.9		3.5		17.4
Liability Derivatives
Cash flow hedges	Other current liabilities		18.2		8.7		9.5		45.8		13.4		32.4	Other current liabilities		8.5		8.3		0.2		9.9		9.6		0.3
Cash flow hedges	Other long-term liabilities		5.7		4.3		1.4		22.8		4.3		18.5	Other long-term liabilities		3.9		3.5		0.4		3.7		3.5		0.2

The following net investment hedge gains (losses) were recognized on our condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive income (in millions):

We operate on a global basis and are subject to numerous and complex tax laws and regulations. Additionally, tax laws continue to undergo rapid changes in both application and interpretation by various countries, including state aid interpretations and initiatives led by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Our income tax filings are subject to examinations by taxing authorities throughout the world. Income tax audits may require an extended period of time to reach resolution and may result in significant income tax adjustments when interpretation of tax laws or allocation of company profits is disputed. Although ultimate timing is uncertain, the net amount of tax liability for unrecognized tax benefits may change within the next twelve months due to changes in audit status, expiration of statutes of limitations, settlements of tax assessments and other events. Management’s best estimate of such change is within the range of a ~~$115~~$175 million decrease to a $25 million increase.

Our U.S. Federal income tax returns have been audited through 2009 and are currently under audit for years 2010-2015. The IRS has proposed adjustments for years 2005-2012, reallocating profits between certain of our U.S. and foreign subsidiaries. We have disputed these adjustments and intend to continue to vigorously defend our positions. For years 2005-2007 and 2008-2009, we have filed ~~a petition~~petitions with the U.S. Tax Court. For years ~~2008-2009,~~2010-2012, we are pursuing resolution through the IRS Administrative Appeals Process.

On December 22, 2017, the U.S. government enacted comprehensive tax legislation commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the "2017 Tax Act"). The 2017 Tax Act made changes to the U.S. tax code, which included (1) reducing the U.S. corporate income tax rate from 35 percent to 21 percent, (2) implementing a base erosion and anti-abuse tax, (3) generally eliminating U.S. federal income taxes on dividends from foreign subsidiaries, (4) adding a new provision designed to tax global intangible low-taxed income ("GILTI") of foreign subsidiaries which allows for the possibility of utilizing foreign tax credits to offset the tax liability (subject to some limitations), (5) implementing a lower effective U.S. income tax rate on certain revenues from sources outside the U.S., and (6) implementing a one-time transition tax on certain undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries. In the year ended December 31, 2017, we recorded a provisional discrete net tax benefit associated with the 2017 Tax Act and related matters. In the three and six month periods ended June 30, ~~2018, we did not make any material changes~~2019, our effective tax rate (“ETR”) was 6.0 percent and 12.5 percent, respectively, compared to ~~the amount recorded~~15.1 percent and 18.2 percent in the year ended December 31, 2017. As of June 30, 2018, the amounts recorded for the 2017 Tax Act remain provisional for the transition tax, the remeasurement of deferred taxes, and our reassessment of permanently reinvested earnings, uncertain tax positions and other related matters. These estimates may be impacted by further analysis and future clarification and guidance regarding available tax accounting methods and elections, earnings and profits computations, state tax conformity to federal tax changes and the impact of the GILTI provisions. We have not yet determined our policy election with respect to whether to record deferred taxes for basis differences expected to reverse as a result of the GILTI provisions in future periods or use the period cost method. We have, however, included an estimate of the current GILTI impact in our tax provision for 2018.

In the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2018, ~~our effective tax rate (“ETR”) was 15.1 percent and 18.2 percent,~~ respectively. InThe decline in ETR in the three month period ended June 30, ~~2018, we recognized a tax benefit related~~2019, compared to ~~adjustments from internal restructuring transactions. Other than this tax benefit, our ETR approximates~~ the ~~U.S. federal income tax rate for both the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2018. In the~~same prior year ~~periods, we had~~period was primarily due to the favorable resolution of certain ~~discrete adjustments that significantly impacted our ETR. In~~tax audits. The decline in ETR in the six month period ended June 30, ~~2017, we recognized a tax benefit of $69.7 million resulting from a tax restructuring that lowered~~2019, compared to the ~~tax rate on certain deferred tax liabilities recorded on intangible assets recognized in~~same prior year period was primarily due to the ~~Biomet merger acquisition-related accounting. In the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2017, we recognized tax benefits of $67.0 million and $88.8 million, respectively, related to~~favorable resolution of certain tax ~~matters. In addition,~~audits as well as a release of uncertain tax positions due to emerging foreign tax guidance in the first quarter. Absent discrete tax events, we expect our ~~prior year~~future ETR ~~was affected by~~will continue to be lower than the ~~significant expenses associated with the Biomet merger~~U.S. corporate income tax rate of 21.0 percent due to our mix of earnings between U.S. and ~~other acquisitions~~foreign locations, which have ~~generally been recognized in higher~~lower corporate income tax ~~jurisdictions. Accordingly, this has reduced~~rates. Our ETR in future periods could also potentially be impacted by: changes in our ~~ETR as~~mix of pre-tax earnings; changes in tax rates, tax laws or their interpretation, including the European Union rules on state aid; the outcome of various federal, state and foreign audits; and the expiration of certain statutes of limitations. Currently, we cannot reasonably estimate the impact of these items on our ~~earnings have been lower in these higher income tax jurisdictions.~~ financial results.

We have defined benefit pension plans covering certain U.S. and Puerto Rico employees. The employees who are not participating in the defined benefit plans receive additional benefits under our defined contribution plans. Plan benefits are primarily based on years of credited service and the participant’s compensation. In addition to the U.S. and Puerto Rico defined benefit pension plans, we sponsor various foreign pension arrangements, including retirement and termination benefit plans required by local law or coordinated with government sponsored plans.

The components of net periodic pension expense for our U.S. and foreign defined benefit pension plans are as follows (in millions):

Service cost is recognized in the operating expense line item in which the related employee is classified. All other components of net periodic pension expense are recognized in ~~Other~~other expense, net.

We expect that we will have minimal legally required funding obligations in ~~2018~~2019 for our U.S. and Puerto Rico defined benefit pension plans, and therefore we have not made, nor do we voluntarily expect to make, any material contributions to these plans during ~~2018.~~2019. We contributed ~~$9.8~~$11.3 million to our foreign-based defined benefit pension plans in the six month period ended June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, and we expect to contribute ~~$9.7~~$8.2 million to these foreign-based plans during the remainder of ~~2018.~~2019.

The following is a reconciliation of weighted average shares for the basic and diluted shares computations (in millions):

During the three and six month periods ended June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, an average of ~~3.4~~2.1 million options and ~~2.3~~1.7 million options, respectively, to purchase shares of common stock were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the exercise prices of these options were greater than the average market price of our common stock. In the three and six month periods ended June 30, ~~2017,~~2018, an average of ~~1.0~~3.4 million options and ~~0.7~~2.3 million options, respectively, were not included for the same reason.

We design, manufacture and market ~~orthopaedic~~orthopedic reconstructive products; sports medicine, biologics, extremities and trauma products; spine, craniomaxillofacial and thoracic products (“CMF”); office based technologies; dental implants; and related surgical products. ~~We allocate~~Our chief operating decision maker (“CODM”) allocates resources to achieve our operating profit goals through seven operating segments. Our operating segments are comprised of both geographic and product category business units. The geographic operating segments are the Americas, which is comprised principally of the U.S. and includes other North, Central and South American markets; EMEA, which is comprised principally of Europe and includes the Middle East and African markets; and Asia Pacific, which is comprised ~~primarily~~principally of Japan, China and Australia and includes other Asian and Pacific markets. The product category operating segments are Spine, ~~less Asia Pacific;~~ Office Based ~~Technologies;~~Technologies, CMF and Dental. The geographic operating segments include results from all of our product categories except those in the product category operating segments. The Office Based Technologies, CMF and Dental product

category operating segments reflect those respective product category results from all regions, whereas the Spine ~~less Asia Pacific~~ product category operating segment includes all spine product results excluding those from Asia Pacific.

As it relates to the geographic operating segments, ~~we evaluate~~our CODM evaluates performance based upon segment operating profit exclusive of operating expenses pertaining to inventory ~~step-up~~ and ~~certain other inventory and manufacturing related~~manufacturing-related charges, intangible asset amortization, intangible asset impairment, acquisition, integration and related, quality remediation, litigation, litigation settlement gain, certain European Union Medical Device Regulation expenses, other charges, and global operations and corporate functions. Global operations and corporate functions include research, development engineering, medical education, brand management, corporate legal, finance and human resource functions, manufacturing operations and logistics and share-based payment expense. As it relates to each product category operating segment, research, development engineering, medical education, brand management and other various costs that are specific to the product category operating segment’s operations are reflected in its operating profit results. Due to these additional costs included in the product category operating segments, profitability metrics among the geographic operating segments and product category operating segments are not comparable. Intercompany transactions have been eliminated from segment operating profit.

~~We do~~Our CODM does not review asset information by operating segment. Instead, ~~we review~~our CODM reviews cash flow and other financial ratios by operating segment.

These seven operating segments are the basis for our reportable segment information provided below. The four product category operating segments are individually insignificant to our consolidated results and therefore do not constitute a reporting segment either individually or combined. For presentation purposes, these product category operating segments have been aggregated. Prior period reportable segment financial information has been restated to ~~reflect~~conform to the ~~impact of the adoption of ASU 2017-07 and ASU 2014-09, as described in Note 2.~~current presentation.

	Net Sales				Operating Profit						Net Sales				Operating Profit
	Six Months Ended				Six Months Ended						Three Months Ended				Three Months Ended
	June 30,				June 30,						June 30,				June 30,
	2018		2017		2018			2017			2019		2018		2019			2018
Americas	$	1,970.4	$	1,969.8	$	1,035.2		$	1,064.8		$	989.1	$	979.3	$	538.8		$	530.1
EMEA		832.6		773.1		259.0			248.6			383.2		400.0		116.9			117.5
Asia Pacific		618.1		568.8		216.7			211.8			321.9		319.2		114.8			109.7
Product Category Operating Segments		604.1		610.2		93.3			142.4			294.4		309.1		49.7			39.4
Global Operations and Corporate Functions		-		-		(470.9	)		(422.9	)		-		-		(275.0	)		(235.2	)
Total	$	4,025.2	$	3,921.9							$	1,988.6	$	2,007.6

Inventory step-up and other inventory and manufacturing related charges						(19.7	)		(41.2	)
Inventory and manufacturing-related charges																(34.1	)		(12.5	)
Intangible asset amortization						(300.3	)		(299.7	)						(146.9	)		(149.5	)
Intangible asset impairment						-			(26.8	)						(70.1	)		-
Acquisition, integration and related						(96.5	)		(130.7	)						(10.5	)		(50.5	)
Quality remediation						(91.6	)		(91.2	)						(23.4	)		(45.4	)
Litigation						(1.5	)		(7.0	)						(7.0	)		4.2
European Union Medical Device Regulation																(5.1	)		(0.5	)
Other charges						(22.7	)		(19.9	)						(43.4	)		(11.3	)
Operating profit					$	601.0		$	628.2						$	204.7		$	296.0

On a quarterly and annual basis, we review relevant information with respect to loss contingencies and update our accruals, disclosures and estimates of reasonably possible losses or ranges of loss based on such reviews. We establish liabilities for loss contingencies when it is probable that a loss has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. For matters where a loss is believed to be reasonably possible, but not probable, no accrual has been made.

Durom^® Cup-related claims: On July 22, 2008, we temporarily suspended marketing and distribution of the Durom Cup in the U.S. Subsequently, a number of product liability lawsuits were filed against us in various U.S. and foreign jurisdictions. The plaintiffs seek damages for personal injury, and they generally allege that the Durom Cup contains defects that result in complications and premature revision of the device. We have settled the majority of these claims and others are still pending. The majority of the pending U.S. lawsuits are currently in a federal Multidistrict Litigation (“MDL”) in the District of New Jersey (In Re: Zimmer Durom Hip Cup Products Liability Litigation). ~~As of June 30, 2018, litigation~~Litigation activity in the MDLis stayed ~~to allow participation in~~pending finalization of the U.S. Durom Cup Settlement Program, an extrajudicial program created to resolve actions and claims of eligible U.S. plaintiffs and claimants. Other lawsuits are pending in various domestic and foreign jurisdictions, and additional claims may be asserted in the future. The majority of claims outside the U.S. are pending in ~~Canada,~~ Germany, Netherlands ~~Italy~~ and ~~the UK. A Canadian class settlement was approved in late 2016, and the period~~Italy.

Since 2008, we have recognized net expense of $443.0 million for ~~class members to submit a claim for compensation under the settlement closed in September 2017. The majority of claims in the UK are consolidated in a Group Litigation Order.~~

Durom Cup-related claims. In the ~~second quarter of 2018,~~three and six month periods ended June 30, 2019, we lowered our estimate of the number of Durom Cup-related claims we expect to ~~settle. Therefore,~~settle and, as a result, we recognized ~~a $20.0~~gains of $7.0 million ~~gain~~and $9.5 million, respectively, in selling, general and administrative ~~expense~~expense. We recorded a $20.0 million gain in the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2018.~~In the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2017, we did not record any expense for Durom Cup-related claims.~~ ~~Since 2008, we have recognized net expense of $469.7 million for Durom Cup-related claims.~~

We maintain insurance for product liability claims, subject to self-insurance retention requirements. We have recovered insurance proceeds from certain of our insurance carriers for Durom Cup-related claims. While we may recover additional insurance proceeds in the future for Durom Cup-related claims, we do not have a receivable recorded on our condensed consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, ~~2018~~2019 for any possible future insurance recoveries for these claims.

Our estimate as of June 30, ~~2018~~2019 of the remaining liability for all Durom Cup-related claims is ~~$119.4~~$73.5 million, of which ~~$48.9~~$19.5 million is classified as short-term in ~~“Other~~other current ~~liabilities”~~liabilities and ~~$70.5~~$54.0 million is classified as long-term in ~~“Other~~other long-term

~~liabilities”~~ liabilities on our condensed consolidated balance sheet. We expect to pay the majority of the Durom Cup-related claims within the next few years.

Our understanding of clinical outcomes with the Durom Cup and other large diameter hip cups continues to evolve. We rely on significant estimates in determining the provisions for Durom Cup-related claims, including our estimate of the number of claims that we will receive and the average amount we will pay per claim. The actual number of claims and the actual amount we pay per claim may differ from our estimates. Among other factors, since our understanding of the clinical outcomes is still evolving, we cannot reasonably estimate the possible loss or range of loss that may result from Durom Cup-related claims in excess of the losses we have accrued. Although we are vigorously defending these lawsuits, their ultimate resolution is uncertain.

~~Margo and Daniel Polett v. Zimmer, Inc. et al.~~: On August 20, 2008, Margo and Daniel Polett filed an action against us and an unrelated third party, Public Communications, Inc. (“PCI”), in the Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania seeking an unspecified amount of damages for injuries and loss of consortium allegedly suffered by Mrs. Polett and her spouse, respectively. The complaint alleged that defendants were negligent in connection with Mrs. Polett’s participation in a promotional video featuring one of our knee products. The case was tried in November 2010 and the jury returned a verdict in favor of plaintiffs. The jury awarded $27.6 million in compensatory damages and apportioned fault 30 percent to plaintiffs, 34 percent to us and 36 percent to PCI. Under applicable law, we may be liable for any portion of the damages apportioned to PCI that it does not pay. On December 2, 2010, we and PCI filed a motion for post-trial relief seeking a judgment notwithstanding the verdict, a new trial or a remittitur. On June 10, 2011, the trial court entered an order denying our motion for post-trial relief and affirming the jury verdict in full and entered judgment for ~~$20.3 million~~ against us and PCI. On June 29, 2011, we filed a notice of appeal to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania and posted a bond for the verdict amount plus interest. Oral argument before the appellate court in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania was held on March 13, 2012. On March 1, 2013, the Superior Court of Pennsylvania vacated the ~~$27.6 million judgment and remanded the case for a new trial. On March 15, 2013, plaintiffs filed a motion for re-argument~~ ~~en banc, and on March 28, 2013, we filed our response in opposition. On May 9, 2013, the Superior Court of Pennsylvania granted plaintiffs’ motion for re-argument~~ ~~en banc. Oral argument (re-argument~~ ~~en banc~~) before the Superior Court of Pennsylvania was held on October 16, 2013. On December 20, 2013, the Court issued its opinion again vacating the trial court judgment and remanding the case for a new trial. On January 21, 2014, plaintiffs filed a petition for allowance of appeal in the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, which was granted on May 21, 2014. Oral argument before the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania took place on October 8, 2014. On October 27, 2015, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania reversed the order of the Superior Court of Pennsylvania and remanded the case to that court to consider the question of whether the trial court erred in refusing to remit the jury’s compensatory damages award. On June 6, 2016, an ~~en banc~~ ~~panel of the Superior Court of Pennsylvania vacated the~~ ~~$27.6 million~~ ~~verdict and remanded the case back to the trial court for reconsideration of whether remittitur was appropriate. On December 2, 2016, the trial court remitted the verdict to~~ ~~$21.5 million,~~ which, after being molded to reduce for plaintiffs’ comparative negligence, totals approximately $15.8 million between PCI and us. On December 5, 2016, we filed a notice of appeal to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania. Oral argument before the Superior Court of Pennsylvania took place on September 20, 2017, and on December 15, 2017, the Superior Court of Pennsylvania issued its decision affirming the $21.5 million remitted award. We subsequently filed a motion for re-argument ~~en banc~~ on December 29, 2017, which motion was denied without opinion on February 12, 2018. We filed a petition for allowance of appeal in the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania on March 14, 2018. That petition was pending as of June 30, 2018. While we are pursuing appeal, we recorded a charge in the three month period ended December 31, 2017 for the approximately $15.8 million remitted and molded verdict, plus post-judgment interest from the date of verdict in 2010.

NexGen^® Knee System claims: Following a wide-spread advertising campaign conducted by certain law firms beginning in 2010, a number of product liability lawsuits have been filed against us in various jurisdictions. The plaintiffs seek damages for personal injury, alleging that certain products within the NexGen Knee System, specifically the NexGen Flex Femoral Components and MIS Stemmed Tibial Component, suffer from defects that cause them to loosen prematurely. The majority of the cases are currently pending in an MDL in the Northern District of Illinois (In Re: Zimmer NexGen Knee Implant Products Liability Litigation). Other cases are pending in various state courts, and additional lawsuits may be filed. Thus far, all cases decided by the MDL court or a jury on the merits have involved NexGen Flex Femoral Components, which represent the majority of cases in the MDL. The initial bellwether trial took place in October 2015 and resulted in a defense verdict. The next scheduled bellwether trial, which was set to commence in November 2016, was dismissed following the court’s grant of summary judgment in our favor in October 2016. That decision was appealed by the plaintiff and subsequently affirmed by the ~~Seventh Circuit~~U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in March 2018. The second bellwether trial took place in January 2017 and resulted in a defense verdict. The parties attended a court-ordered mediation in January 2018, at which a settlement in principle was reached that would resolve all MDL cases and all state court cases that involved MDL products. On February 11, 2019, we informed the MDL ~~proceedings have been stayed pending administration~~court of our intention to consummate a confidential settlement that resolves nearly all of the ~~aforementioned settlement.~~remaining cases, which was completed in June 2019. The settlement did not have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or cash flows.

Zimmer M/L Taper, M/L Taper with Kinectiv Technology, and Versys Femoral Head-related claims: We are a defendant in a number of product liability lawsuits relating to our M/L Taper and M/L Taper with Kinectiv Technology hip stems, and Versys Femoral Head implants. The plaintiffs seek damages for personal injury, alleging that defects in the products lead to corrosion at the

head/stem junction resulting in, among other things, pain, inflammation and revision surgery. The majority of the cases are consolidated in an MDL in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (In Re: Zimmer M/L Taper Hip Prosthesis or M/L Taper Hip Prosthesis with Kinectiv Technology and Versys Femoral Head Products Liability Litigation). Other related cases are pending in various state courts, with the majority of state court cases pending in Oregon, New Mexico, Indiana and Florida. Additional lawsuits are likely to be filed. Although we are vigorously defending these lawsuits, their ultimate resolution is uncertain.

Biomet metal-on-metal hip implant claims: Biomet is a defendant in a number of product liability lawsuits relating to metal-on-metal hip implants, most of which involve the M2a-Magnum^TMhip system. ~~The majority of the cases~~Cases are currently consolidated in an MDL in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Indiana (In Re: Biomet M2a Magnum Hip Implant Product Liability

Litigation)~~. Other cases are pending~~ andin various state and foreign courts, with the majority of domestic state court cases pending in Indiana and Florida.

On February 3, 2014, Biomet announced the settlement of the MDL. Lawsuits filed in the MDL by April 15, 2014 were eligible to participate in the settlement. Those claims that did not settle via the MDL settlement program have re-commenced litigation in the MDL under a new case management ~~plan.~~plan, or are in the process of being remanded to their originating jurisdictions. The settlement does not affect certain other claims relating to Biomet’s metal-on-metal hip products that are pending in various state and foreign courts, or other claims that may be filed in the future. Our estimate as of June 30, ~~2018~~2019 of the remaining liability for all Biomet metal-on-metal hip implant claims is ~~$41.4~~$64.3 million.

Biomet has exhausted the self-insured retention in its insurance program and has been reimbursed for claims related to its metal-on-metal products up to its policy limits in the program. Zimmer Biomet is responsible for any amounts by which the ultimate losses exceed the amount of Biomet’s third-party insurance coverage. As of June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, Biomet had received all of the insurance proceeds it expects to recover under the excess policies. Although we are vigorously defending these lawsuits, their ultimate resolution is uncertain.

Heraeus trade secret misappropriation lawsuits: In December 2008, Heraeus Kulzer GmbH (together with its affiliates, “Heraeus”) initiated legal proceedings in Germany against Biomet, Inc., Biomet Europe BV, certain other entities and certain employees alleging that the defendants misappropriated Heraeus trade secrets when developing Biomet Europe’s Refobacin and Biomet Bone Cement line of cements (“European Cements”). The lawsuit sought to preclude the defendants from producing, marketing and offering for sale their ~~current~~then-current line of European Cements and to compensate Heraeus for any damages incurred.

Germany: On June 5, 2014, the German appeals court in Frankfurt (i) enjoined Biomet, Inc., Biomet Europe BV and Biomet Deutschland GmbH from manufacturing, selling or offering the European Cements to the extent they contain certain raw materials in particular specifications; (ii) held the defendants jointly and severally liable to Heraeus for any damages from the sale of European Cements since 2005; and (iii) ruled that no further review may be sought (the “Frankfurt Decision”). The Heraeus and Biomet parties both sought appeal against the Frankfurt Decision. In a decision dated June 16, 2016, the German Supreme Court dismissed the parties’ appeals without reaching the merits, rendering that decision final.

In December 2016, Heraeus filed papers to restart proceedings against Biomet Orthopaedics Switzerland GmbH, seeking to require that entity to relinquish its CE certificates for the European Cements. In January 2017, Heraeus notified Biomet it had filed a claim for damages in the amount of €121.9 million for sales in ~~Germany.~~Germany, which it first increased to €125.9 million and with a filing in June 2019 further increased to €146.7 million plus statutory interest. In September 2017, Heraeus filed an enforcement action in the ~~Frankfurt~~Darmstadt court against Biomet Europe, requesting that a fine be imposed against Biomet Europe for failure to ~~prevent~~disclose the amount of the European Cements which Biomet Orthopaedics Switzerland ~~from having bone cements~~had ordered to be manufactured in Germany (e.g., for the Chinese ~~market manufactured in Germany. As of~~market). In June ~~30,~~ 2018, ~~these claims were still pending.~~the Darmstadt court dismissed Heraeus’ request. Heraeus appealed the decision. Also in September 2017, Heraeus filed suit against Zimmer Biomet Deutschland in the court of first instance in Freiberg concerning the sale of the European Cements with certain changed raw materials. Heraeus seeks an injunction on the basis that the continued use of the product names for the European Cements is misleading for customers and thus an act of unfair competition. On June 29, 2018, the court in Freiberg, Germany dismissed Heraeus’ request for an injunction prohibiting the marketing of the European Cements under their current ~~names.~~names on the grounds that the same request had already been decided upon by the Frankfurt Decision which became final and binding. Heraeus ~~may appeal~~has appealed this decision to the Court of Appeals in Karlsruhe, Germany. The appeals hearing is scheduled for December 2019.

United States: On September 8, 2014, Heraeus filed a complaint against a Biomet supplier, Esschem, Inc. (“Esschem”), in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. The lawsuit contained allegations that focused on two copolymer compounds that Esschem ~~sells~~sold to Biomet, which Biomet ~~incorporates~~incorporated into certain bone cement products that compete with Heraeus’ bone cement products. The complaint alleged that Biomet helped Esschem to develop these copolymers, using Heraeus trade secrets that Biomet allegedly misappropriated. The complaint asserted a claim under the Pennsylvania Uniform Trade Secrets Act, as well as other various common law tort claims, all based upon the same trade secret misappropriation theory. Heraeus sought to enjoin

Esschem from supplying the copolymers to any third party and actual damages. The complaint also sought punitive damages, costs and attorneys’ fees. Although Biomet was not a party to this lawsuit, Biomet agreed, at Esschem’s request and subject to certain limitations, to indemnify Esschem for any liability, damages and legal costs related to this matter. On November 3, 2014, the court entered an order denying Heraeus’ motion for a temporary restraining order. On June 30, 2016, the court entered an order denying Heraeus’ request to give preclusive effect to the factual findings in the Frankfurt Decision. On June 6, 2017, the court entered an order denying Heraeus’ motion to add Biomet as a party to the lawsuit. On January 26, 2018, the court entered an order granting Esschem’s motion for summary judgment and dismissed all of Heraeus’ claims with prejudice. On February 21, 2018, Heraeus filed a notice of appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third ~~Circuit.~~Circuit, which heard oral argument on the appeal on October 23, 2018. On June 21, 2019, the Third Circuit partially reversed the decision of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania granting Esschem summary judgment and remanded the case back to the lower court. On July 5, 2019, Esschem filed a petition in the Third Circuit for rehearing en banc and a motion in the alternative to certify a question of state law to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, which remained pending as of July 31, 2019.

On December 7, 2017, Heraeus filed a complaint against Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. and Biomet, Inc. in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania alleging a single claim of trade secret misappropriation under the Pennsylvania Uniform Trade Secrets Act based on the same factual allegations as the Esschem litigation. On March 5, 2018, Heraeus filed an amended complaint adding a second claim of trade secret misappropriation under Pennsylvania common law. Heraeus seeks to enjoin the Zimmer Biomet parties from future use of the allegedly misappropriated trade secrets and recovery of unspecified damages for alleged past use. On April 18, 2018, the Zimmer Biomet parties filed a motion to dismiss both claims. On March 8, 2019, the court stayed the case pending the Third Circuit’s decision in the Esschem case described above.

Other European Countries: Heraeus continues to pursue other related legal proceedings in Europe seeking various forms of relief, including injunctive relief and damages, against Biomet-related entities relating to the European Cements. On October 2, 2018, the Belgian Court of Appeal of Mons issued a judgment in favor of Heraeus relating to its request for past damages caused by the alleged misappropriation of its trade secrets, and an injunction preventing future sales of certain European Cements in Belgium (the “Belgian Decision”). We have appealed this judgment to the Belgian Supreme Court. Heraeus subsequently filed a suit in Belgium concerning the continued sale of the European Cements with certain changed materials. Like its suit in Germany, Heraeus seeks an injunction on the basis that the continued use of the product names for the European Cements is misleading for customers and thus an act of unfair competition. On May 7, 2019, the Liège Commercial Court issued a judgment that Zimmer Biomet failed to inform its hospital and surgeon customers of the changes made to the composition of the cement with certain changed materials and ordered, as a sole remedy, that Zimmer Biomet send letters to those customers, which we have done. We filed an appeal to the judgment.

On February 13, 2019, a Norwegian court of first instance issued a judgment in favor of Heraeus on its claim for misappropriation of trade secrets. The court awarded damages of 19,500,000 NOK, or approximately $2.3 million, plus attorneys’ fees, and issued an injunction, which is not final and thus not currently being enforced, preventing Zimmer Biomet Norway from marketing in Norway bone cements identified with the current product names and bone cements making use of the trade secrets which were acknowledged in the Frankfurt Decision. We have appealed the Norwegian judgment to the court of second instance.

Heraeus is pursuing damages and injunctive relief in France in an effort to prevent us from manufacturing, marketing and selling the European Cements (the “France Litigation”). The European Cements are manufactured at our facility in Valence, France. On December 11, 2018, a hearing was held in the France Litigation before the commercial court in Romans-sur-Isère. On May 23, 2019, the commercial court ruled in our favor. On July 12, 2019, Hereaus filed an appeal to the court of second instance in Grenoble, France. Although we are vigorously defending the France Litigation, the ultimate outcome is uncertain. An adverse ruling in the France Litigation could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We have accrued an estimated loss relating to the Frankfurt Decision, but have not recognized any losses for Heraeus-related lawsuits in other jurisdictions because we do not believe it is probable that we have incurred a liability, and we cannot reasonably estimate any loss that might eventually be incurred.collective European trade secret litigation, including estimated legal costs to defend. Damages relating to the Frankfurt Decision are subject to separate proceedings, and the Belgian court appointed an expert to determine the amount of damages related to the Belgian Decision. Thus, it is reasonably possible that our estimate of the loss we may incur may change in the future. Although we are vigorously defending these lawsuits, their ultimate resolution is uncertain.

Stryker patent infringement lawsuit: On December 10, 2010, Stryker Corporation and related entities (“Stryker”) filed suit against us in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan, alleging that certain of our Pulsavac^® Plus Wound Debridement Products infringethreeU.S. patents assigned to Stryker. The case was tried beginning on January 15, 2013, and on February 5, 2013, the jury found that we infringed certain claims of the subject patents. The jury awarded~~$70.0~~ $70.0 million in monetary damages for lost profits. The jury also found that we willfully infringed the subject patents. We filed multiple post-trial motions, including a motion seeking a new trial. On August 7, 2013, the trial court issued a ruling denying all of our motions and awarded treble damages and attorneys’ fees to Stryker. We filed a notice of appeal to the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit to seek reversal of both the jury’s verdict and the trial court’s rulings on our post-trial motions. Oral argument before the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit took place on September 8, 2014. On December 19, 2014, the Federal Circuit issued a decision affirming the $70.0 million lost profits award but reversed the willfulness finding, vacating the treble damages award and vacating and remanding the attorneys’ fees award. We accrued an estimated loss of $70.0 million related to this matter in the three month period ended

December 31, 2014. On January 20, 2015, Stryker filed a motion with the Federal Circuit for a rehearing en banc. On March 23, 2015, the Federal Circuit denied Stryker’s petition. Stryker subsequently filed a petition for certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court. In July 2015, we paid the final lost profits award of $90.3 million, which includes the original $70.0 million plus pre- and post-judgment interest and damages for sales that occurred post-trial but prior to our entry into a license agreement with Stryker. On October 19, 2015, the U.S. Supreme Court granted Stryker’s petition for certiorari. Oral argument took place on February 23, 2016. On June 13, 2016, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its decision, vacating the judgment of the Federal Circuit and remanding the case for further proceedings related to the willfulness issue. On September 12, 2016, the Federal Circuit issued an opinion affirming the jury’s willfulness finding and vacating and remanding the trial court’s award of treble damages, its finding that this was an exceptional case and its award of attorneys’ fees. The case was remanded back to the trial court. Oral argument on Stryker’s renewed consolidated motion for enhanced damages and attorneys’ fees took place on June 28, 2017. On July 12, 2017, the trial court issued an order reaffirming its award of treble damages, its finding that this was an exceptional case and its award of ~~attorney’s~~attorneys’ fees. On July 24, 2017, we appealed the ruling to the Federal Circuit and obtained a supersedeas bond staying enforcement of the judgment pending appeal. ~~Although~~Oral argument before the Federal Circuit took place on December 3, 2018 and the Federal Circuit affirmed the trial court’s ruling in full on December 10, 2018. We accrued an estimated loss of approximately $168.0 million related to the award of treble damages and attorneys’ fees in the three-month period ended December 31, 2018. On January 23, 2019, we ~~are defending this lawsuit vigorously,~~filed a petition with the ~~ultimate resolution~~Federal Circuit for a rehearing en banc. On March 19, 2019, the petition for rehearing en banc was denied. In late March 2019, we paid the outstanding judgment of ~~this matter is uncertain. In~~approximately $168.0 million. On June 17, 2019, we filed a petition for certiorari seeking U.S. Supreme Court review of the ~~future, we could be required to record a charge of up to~~ ~~$170.0 million that could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and cash flows.~~Federal Circuit’s decision.

Putative Securities Class Action: On December 2, 2016, a complaint was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Indiana (Shah v. Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. et al.), naming us, ~~two~~one of our officers and ~~one~~two of our now former officers as defendants. On June 28, 2017, the plaintiffs filed a corrected amended complaint, naming as defendants, in addition to those previously named, current and former members of our Board of Directors, one additional officer, and the underwriters in connection with secondary offerings of our common stock by certain selling stockholders in 2016. On October 6, 2017, the plaintiffs voluntarily dismissed the underwriters without prejudice. On October 8, 2017, the plaintiffs filed a second amended complaint, naming as defendants, in addition to those current and former officers and Board members previously named, certain former stockholders of ours who sold shares of our common stock in secondary public offerings in 2016. We and our current and former officers and Board members named as defendants are sometimes hereinafter referred to as the “Zimmer Biomet Defendant group”. The former stockholders of ours who sold shares of our common stock in secondary public offerings in 2016 are sometimes hereinafter referred to as the “Private Equity Fund Defendant group”. The second amended complaint relates to a putative class action on behalf of persons who purchased our common stock between June 7, 2016 and November 7, 2016. The second amended complaint generally alleges that the defendants violated federal securities laws by making materially false and/or misleading statements and/or omissions about our compliance with ~~FDA~~ U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) regulations and our ability to continue to accelerate our organic revenue growth rate in the second half of 2016. The defendants filed their respective motions to dismiss on December 20, 2017, plaintiffs filed their omnibus response to the motions to dismiss on March 13, 2018 and the defendants filed their respective reply briefs on May 18, 2018. On September 27, 2018, the court denied the Zimmer Biomet Defendant group’s motion to dismiss in its entirety. The court granted the Private Equity Fund Defendant group’s motion to dismiss, without prejudice. On October 9, 2018, the Zimmer Biomet Defendant group filed a motion (i) to amend the court’s order on the motion to certify two issues for interlocutory appeal, and (ii) to stay proceedings pending appeal. On February 21, 2019, that motion was denied. On April 11, 2019, the plaintiffs moved for class certification. On June 20, 2019, the Zimmer Biomet Defendant group filed its response. The plaintiffs seek unspecified damages and interest, attorneys’ fees, costs and other relief. We believe this lawsuit is without merit, and we and the individual defendants are defending it vigorously.

Shareholder Derivative Actions: On June 14 and July 29, 2019, two separate shareholder derivative actions, Green v. Begley et al. and Detectives Endowment Association Annuity Fund v. Begley et al., were filed in the court of Chancery in the State of Delaware. The plaintiff in each action seeks to maintain the action purportedly on our behalf against certain of our current and former directors and officers (the “individual defendants”) and certain former stockholders of ours who sold shares of our common stock in various secondary public offerings in 2016 (the “private equity fund defendants”). The plaintiff in each action alleges, among other things, breaches of fiduciary duties against the individual defendants and insider trading against two individual defendants and the private equity fund defendants, based on substantially the same factual allegations as the putative federal securities class action referenced above (Shah v. Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. et al.). The plaintiffs do not seek damages from us, but instead request damages from the defendants of an unspecified amount on our behalf. The plaintiffs also seek attorneys’ fees, costs and other relief. As of July 31, 2019, the parties were negotiating stipulations governing service of process and the timing for motions by the various defendants, including potential motions to stay, motions raising demand futility issues and substantive motions to dismiss some or all of the asserted claims.

U.S. International Trade Commission Investigation: On March 5, 2019, Heraeus filed a complaint with the U.S. International Trade Commission (“ITC”) against us and certain of our subsidiaries. The complaint alleges that Biomet misappropriated Heraeus’ trade secrets in the formulation and manufacture of two bone cement products now sold by Zimmer Biomet, both of which are imported from our Valence, France facility. Heraeus requested that the ITC institute an investigation and, after the investigation, issue a limited exclusion order and cease and desist orders. On April 5, 2019, the ITC ordered an investigation be instituted into whether we have committed an “unfair act” in the importation, sale for importation, or sale after importation of certain bone cement products. The investigation is ongoing, and an evidentiary hearing in front of an administrative law judge at the ITC is scheduled for January 2020. We cannot currently predict the outcome of this investigation.

FDA warning letters: In August 2018, we received a warning letter from the FDA related to observed non-conformities with current good manufacturing practice requirements of the FDA’s Quality System Regulation (21 CFR Part 820) (“QSR”) at our legacy Biomet manufacturing facility in Warsaw, Indiana (this facility is sometimes referred to in this report as the “Warsaw North Campus”). In May 2016, we received a warning letter from the FDA related to observed non-conformities with current good manufacturing practice requirements of the QSR at our facility in Montreal, Quebec, Canada. InSeptember 2012, ~~Zimmer~~we received a warning letter from the FDA citing concerns relating to certain processes pertaining to products manufactured at our Ponce, Puerto Rico manufacturing facility. ~~In May 2016, Zimmer received a warning letter from the FDA~~ ~~related to observed non-conformities with current good manufacturing practice requirements of the FDA’s Quality System Regulation (21 CFR Part 820) at our facility in Montreal, Quebec, Canada.~~ We have provided detailed responses to the FDA as to our corrective actions and will continue to work expeditiously to address the issues identified by the FDA during inspections in ~~Ponce~~Warsaw, Montreal and ~~Montreal.~~Ponce. As of ~~June 30, 2018,~~July 31, 2019, these warning letters remained pending. Until the violations cited in the pending warning letters are corrected, we may be subject to additional regulatory action by the FDA, as described more fully

below. Additionally, requests for Certificates to Foreign Governments related to products manufactured at certain of our facilities may not be granted and premarket approval applications for Class III devices to which the ~~Quality System Regulation~~QSR deviations at these facilities are reasonably related will not be approved until the violations have been corrected. In addition to responding to the warning letters described above, we are in the process of addressing various FDA Form 483 inspectional observations at certain of our manufacturing facilities, including at both the legacy Zimmer and the legacy Biomet manufacturing facilities in Warsaw, Indiana (the legacy Biomet facility is sometimes referred to in this report as the “Warsaw North Campus”).facilities. The ultimate outcome of these matters is presently uncertain. Among other available regulatory actions, the FDA may impose operating restrictions, including a ceasing of operations, at one or more facilities, enjoining and restraining certain violations of applicable law pertaining to medical devices and assessing civil or criminal penalties against our officers, employees or us. The FDA could also issue a corporate warning letter, a recidivist warning letter or a consent decree of permanent injunction. The FDA may also recommend prosecution by the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”). Any adverse regulatory action, depending on its magnitude, may restrict us from effectively manufacturing, marketing and selling our products and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Deferred Prosecution Agreement (“DPA”) relating to U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (“FCPA”) matters: On January 12, 2017, we resolved previously-disclosed FCPA matters involving Biomet and certain of its subsidiaries. As part of the settlement, (i) Biomet resolved matters with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) through an administrative cease-and-desist order (the “Order”); (ii) we entered into a DPA with the DOJ; and (iii) JERDS Luxembourg Holding S.à r.l. (“JERDS”), the direct parent company of Biomet 3i Mexico SA de CV and an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of Biomet, entered into a plea agreement (the “Plea Agreement”) with the DOJ. The conduct underlying these resolutions occurred prior to our acquisition of Biomet.

Pursuant to the terms of the Order, Biomet resolved claims with the SEC related to violations of the books and records, internal controls and anti-bribery provisions of the FCPA by disgorging profits to the U.S. government in an aggregate amount of approximately $6.5 million, inclusive of pre-judgment interest, and paying a civil penalty in the amount of $6.5 million (collectively, the “Civil Settlement Payments”). We also agreed to pay a criminal penalty of approximately $17.5 million (together with the Civil Settlement Payments, the “Settlement Payments”) to the U.S. government pursuant to the terms of the DPA. We made the Settlement Payments in January 2017 and, as previously disclosed, had accrued, as of June 24, 2015, the closing date of the Biomet merger, an amount sufficient to cover this matter.

Under the DPA, which has a term of three years, the DOJ agreed to defer criminal prosecution of us in connection with the charged violation of the internal controls provision of the FCPA as long as we comply with the terms of the DPA. In addition, we are subject to oversight by an independent compliance ~~monitor. The~~ monitor, who was appointed effective as of ~~July 2017, will focus on legacy Biomet operations as integrated into our operations.~~August 7, 2017. The monitorship may remain in place until August 7, 2020. If we remain in compliance with the DPA during its term, the charges against us will be dismissed with prejudice. The term of the DPA and monitorship may be extended for up to one additional year at the DOJ’s discretion. In addition, under its Plea Agreement with the DOJ, JERDS pleaded guilty on January 13, 2017 to aiding and abetting a violation of the books and records provision of the FCPA. In light of the DPA we entered into, JERDS paid only a nominal assessment and no criminal penalty.

If we do not comply with the terms of the DPA, we could be subject to prosecution for violating the internal controls provisions of the FCPA and the conduct of Biomet and its subsidiaries described in the DPA, which conduct pre-dated our acquisition of Biomet, as well as any new or continuing violations. We could also be subject to exclusion by the Office of Inspector General of the Department of Health and Human Services (“OIG”) from participation in federal healthcare programs, including Medicaid and

Medicare. Any of these events could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

OIG subpoena: In June 2017, we received a subpoena from the OIG. The subpoena requests that we produce a variety of records primarily related to our healthcare professional consulting arrangements (including in the areas of medical education, product development, and clinical research) for the period spanning January 1, 2010 to the present. The subpoena does not indicate the nature of the OIG’s investigation beyond reference to possible false or otherwise improper claims submitted for payment. We are in the process of responding to the subpoena. We cannot currently predict the outcome of this investigation.

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the interim condensed consolidated financial statements and corresponding notes included elsewhere in this Form 10-Q. Certain percentages presented in this discussion and analysis are calculated from the underlying whole-dollar amounts and, therefore, may not recalculate from the rounded numbers used for disclosure purposes. In addition, certain amounts in the 2017 interim condensed consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the 2018 presentation and to reflect the impact of the adoption of ASU 2017-07 and ASU 2014-09, as described in Note 2 to our interim condensed consolidated financial statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this report.

Net sales ~~increased~~declined by ~~3.0~~0.9 percent and ~~2.6~~1.5 percent in the three and six month periods ended June 30, ~~2018, respectively,~~2019, compared to the same prior year periods. The ~~sales increases were~~decline was driven ~~primarily~~ by ~~volume/mix~~declines in ~~our Knees~~pricing and ~~Hips product categories and~~the negative impacts from changes in foreign currency exchange rates, most notably from the weakening of the U.S. Dollar against the Euro, Renminbi and Japanese Yen. We continue to make progress addressing our ongoing supply and quality remediation challenges at our Warsaw North Campus facility, which was reflectedpartially offset by ~~higher year-over-year~~strong volume/mix ~~growth~~ in our ~~second quarter of 2018 compared to our first quarter of 2018.~~Knees, Hips and S.E.T (Surgical, Sports Medicine, Extremities and Trauma) product categories.

Our net earnings ~~were flat~~declined in the three month period ended June 30, ~~2018 compared to the same prior year period and declined~~2019, but increased in the six month period ended June 30, ~~2018~~2019, when compared to the same prior year periods. The decline in the three month period was driven by a $70.1 million IPR&D intangible asset impairment on certain IPR&D projects that we terminated. Additionally, we recognized a $20.8 million charge related to the termination of a raw material supply agreement. These expenses were partially offset by lower quality remediation and acquisition, integration and related expenses in the three month period ended June 30, 2019, compared to the same prior year period. Additionally, interest expense, net, declined $15.6 million in the three month period ended June 30, 2019, compared to the same prior year period, due to hedging strategies that have lowered our effective interest rate and lower average outstanding debt balances. Our net earnings increased in the six month period ended June 30, 2019 when compared to the same prior year period. In the three month period ended June 30, 2018, sales increases and lower acquisition, integration and related expenses were partially offset by hedge losses, increased excess and obsolescence charges, incremental production and inventory costs at our Warsaw North Campus facility and continued investments in research and development (“R&D) and selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”). Additionally, the prior year three month period featured $67.0 million of tax benefits from the resolution of certain tax matters, resulting in higher tax expense in the current year period despite U.S. tax reform. The decline in net earnings in the six month period ended June 30, ~~2018 was primarily due~~2019, lower quality remediation expenses, acquisition, integration and related expenses and interest expense, net, when compared to the same ~~reasons, as well as~~prior year period, along with a ~~tax benefit of $69.7~~$23.5 million gain related to a litigation settlement in the first quarter of ~~2017 resulting from a tax restructuring~~2019, more than offset the additional charges related to the IPR&D intangible asset impairment and raw material supply agreement termination that ~~lowered the tax rate on certain deferred tax liabilities recorded on intangible assets~~were recognized in the ~~Biomet merger acquisition-related accounting.~~second quarter of 2019.

2019 marks the second year of our two-year turnaround effort since the appointment of a new Chief Executive Officer in December 2017. In late 2018 and early 2019, we had various product launches in our Knees product category, which we anticipate will drive improving commercial momentum, especially in the second half of 2019. We estimate ~~our~~the change in sales ~~growth~~ in 2019 compared to 2018 ~~over 2017~~ will be in a range of ~~1.0~~flat to ~~2.5~~positive 0.5 percent. This range includes estimated negative effects of changes in foreign currency exchange rates of 1.25 percent to 1.75 percent. We estimate ~~assumes~~the negative effects of foreign currency exchange rates will increase sales by 1.0 to 1.5 percent. We expect to make additional progress in remediating supply constraints as we progress through the remainder of 2018. As a result, we expect volume/mix growth will be ~~stronger~~much smaller in the second ~~half of the year.~~

We estimate cost of products sold will be higher in 2018 compared to the prior year due to the higher costs of products manufactured at our Warsaw North Campus facility. Based on our inventory turns, these costs are expected to continue to impact our costs of product sold into 2019. We expect ongoing benefits from the reduction of the U.S. corporate income tax rate, and we plan to reinvest those savings into the business to drive sales growth. Accordingly, we expect R&D and SG&A expenses to be higher in 2018 compared to 2017. We expect our acquisition, integration and related expenses to decline in the last half of the year compared to the first half of the year.

In 2019, we expect our net earnings to increase significantly compared to the net loss recognized in 2018. In 2018, we incurred a net loss due to significant goodwill and intangible asset impairments and litigation charges. At this point in time based upon information known or knowable by us, we do not expect to incur similar significant charges in 2019. We expect our costs of products sold will continue to reflect costs associated with our quality remediation efforts. We anticipate continuing to make investments in operating expenses for R&D, salesforce specialization, and to support our new product launches. However, we expect expenses related to our acquisition and integration activities and quality remediation will decline as we complete these projects during 2019. We believe that our ~~integration activities related~~interest expense, net, will continue to ~~the Biomet merger and other 2016 acquisitions. We expect quality remediation expense to remain consistent in the last half of~~decline throughout the year when compared to the ~~first half as we continue our quality remediation at our Warsaw North Campus facility. We expect interest expense in 2018 to be approximately $300 million~~same prior year periods due to lower anticipated debt ~~levels than in 2017.~~levels.

We continue to refine our estimates related to impacts of the 2017 Tax Act. In the year ended December 31, 2017, we recognized an income tax benefit of $1,272.4 million. In accordance with authoritative guidance issued by the SEC, the income tax effect for certain aspects of the 2017 Tax Act represents provisional amounts for which our accounting is incomplete, but with respect to which a reasonable estimate could be determined. I~~n the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2018, we did not make any material changes to the amount recorded in the year ended December 31, 2017.~~ The actual effects of the 2017 Tax Act and final amounts recorded may differ materially from our current estimate of provisional amounts due to, among other things, further interpretive guidance that may be issued by U.S. tax authorities or regulatory bodies, including the SEC and the FASB. We will continue to analyze the 2017 Tax Act and any additional guidance that may be issued so we can finalize the full effects of applying the new legislation on our financial statements in the measurement period, which ends in the fourth quarter of 2018. See Note 11 to our interim condensed consolidated financial statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this report for additional details related to the 2017 Tax Act.

We analyze sales by three geographies, the Americas, EMEA and Asia Pacific, and by the following product categories: Knees, Hips, S.E.T., ~~Dental,~~ Spine & CMF, Dental and Other. This sales analysis differs from our reportable operating segments, which are based upon our senior management organizational structure and how we allocate resources towards achieving operating profit goals. We analyze sales by geography because the underlying market trends in any particular geography tend to be similar across product categories and because we primarily sell the same products in all geographies. Our business is seasonal in nature to some extent, as many of our products are used in elective procedures, which typically decline during the summer months and can increase at the end of the year once annual deductibles have been met on health insurance plans.

The following tables present our net sales by geography and the components of the percentage changes (dollars in millions):

	Three Months Ended																		Three Months Ended
	June 30,								Volume /							Foreign			June 30,				% Inc /				Volume /							Foreign
	2018		2017		% Inc				Mix			Price				Exchange			2019		2018		(Dec)				Mix			Price				Exchange
Americas	$	1,216.3	$	1,203.9		1.0		%		3.3	%		(2.4	)	%		0.1	%	$	1,214.3	$	1,216.3		(0.2	)	%		3.0	%		(2.9	)	%		(0.3	)	%
EMEA		457.7		438.2		4.4				0.5			(2.3	)			6.2			438.0		457.7		(4.3	)			4.5			(2.6	)			(6.2	)
Asia Pacific		333.6		307.4		8.5				8.9			(3.5	)			3.1			336.3		333.6		0.8				6.8			(2.1	)			(3.9	)
Total	$	2,007.6	$	1,949.5		3.0				3.5			(2.5	)			2.0		$	1,988.6	$	2,007.6		(0.9	)			3.9			(2.7	)			(2.1	)


																			Six Months Ended
	Six Months Ended																		June 30,				% Inc /				Volume /							Foreign
	June 30,				% Inc /				Volume /							Foreign			2019		2018		(Dec)				Mix			Price				Exchange
	2018		2017		(Dec)				Mix			Price				Exchange
Americas	$	2,424.4	$	2,433.8		(0.4	)	%		1.8	%		(2.4	)	%		0.2	%	$	2,408.4	$	2,424.4		(0.7	)	%		2.5	%		(2.9	)	%		(0.3	)	%
EMEA		954.2		891.4		7.0				-			(2.4	)			9.4			901.9		954.2		(5.5	)			3.9			(2.2	)			(7.2	)
Asia Pacific		646.6		596.7		8.4				7.7			(3.7	)			4.4			653.8		646.6		1.1				7.3			(2.2	)			(4.0	)
Total	$	4,025.2	$	3,921.9		2.6				2.3			(2.6	)			2.9		$	3,964.1	$	4,025.2		(1.5	)			3.6			(2.6	)			(2.5	)

“Foreign Exchange,” as used in the tables in this report, represents the effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates on sales.

The following tables present our net sales by product category and the components of the percentage changes (dollars in millions):

	Three Months Ended																			Three Months Ended
	June 30,				% Inc /				Volume /								Foreign			June 30,				% Inc /				Volume /								Foreign
	2018		2017		(Dec)				Mix				Price				Exchange			2019		2018		(Dec)				Mix				Price				Exchange
Knees	$	703.0	$	680.0		3.4		%		4.2		%		(2.8	)	%		2.0	%	$	703.5	$	703.0		0.1		%		5.7		%		(3.2	)	%		(2.4	)	%
Hips		486.9		468.0		4.0				4.4				(2.9	)			2.5			479.4		486.9		(1.5	)			4.2				(3.3	)			(2.4	)
S.E.T.		433.8		421.1		3.0				3.6				(2.4	)			1.8			444.4		433.8		2.5				5.6				(1.3	)			(1.8	)
Spine & CMF																					185.9		198.2		(6.2	)			(2.2	)			(2.7	)			(1.3	)
Dental		106.9		110.4		(3.2	)			(4.6	)			(0.9	)			2.3			106.5		106.9		(0.3	)			2.9				(1.2	)			(2.0	)
Spine & CMF		198.2		193.3		2.5				3.8				(2.5	)			1.2
Other		78.8		76.7		2.8				3.1				(1.9	)			1.6			68.9		78.8		(12.6	)			(6.0	)			(4.9	)			(1.7	)
Total	$	2,007.6	$	1,949.5		3.0				3.5				(2.5	)			2.0		$	1,988.6	$	2,007.6		(0.9	)			3.9				(2.7	)			(2.1	)



	Six Months Ended																			Six Months Ended
	June 30,				% Inc /				Volume /								Foreign			June 30,				% Inc /				Volume /								Foreign
	2018		2017		(Dec)				Mix				Price				Exchange			2019		2018		(Dec)				Mix				Price				Exchange
Knees	$	1,416.3	$	1,380.8		2.6		%		2.6		%		(3.0	)	%		3.0	%	$	1,397.6	$	1,416.3		(1.3	)	%		4.6		%		(3.1	)	%		(2.8	)	%
Hips		978.9		941.8		3.9				3.1				(2.8	)			3.6			963.6		978.9		(1.6	)			4.5				(3.2	)			(2.9	)
S.E.T.		876.1		844.6		3.7				3.6				(2.4	)			2.5			884.3		876.1		0.9				4.3				(1.3	)			(2.1	)
Spine & CMF																					368.7		381.3		(3.3	)			0.8				(2.6	)			(1.5	)
Dental		214.5		218.2		(1.7	)			(3.6	)			(1.5	)			3.4			211.0		214.5		(1.6	)			2.1				(1.4	)			(2.3	)
Spine & CMF		381.3		379.6		0.5				0.8				(2.0	)			1.7
Other		158.1		156.9		0.8				(0.1	)			(1.4	)			2.3			138.9		158.1		(12.2	)			(6.3	)			(3.8	)			(2.1	)
Total	$	4,025.2	$	3,921.9		2.6				2.3				(2.6	)			2.9		$	3,964.1	$	4,025.2		(1.5	)			3.6				(2.6	)			(2.5	)

The following table presents our net sales by geography for our Knees and Hips product categories, which represent our most significant product categories (dollars in millions):

	Three Months Ended June 30,							Six Months Ended June 30,				% Inc /				Three Months Ended June 30,				% Inc /				Six Months Ended June 30,				% Inc /
	2018		2017		% Inc			2018		2017		(Dec)				2019		2018		(Dec)				2019		2018		(Dec)
Knees
Americas	$	408.1	$	405.4		0.7	%	$	825.3	$	833.4		(1.0	)	%	$	414.5	$	408.1		1.6		%	$	823.7	$	825.3		(0.2	)	%
EMEA		170.8		159.8		7.0			359.7		327.7		9.8				163.4		170.8		(4.3	)			339.1		359.7		(5.7	)
Asia Pacific		124.1		114.8		8.1			231.3		219.7		5.3				125.6		124.1		1.2				234.8		231.3		1.5
Total	$	703.0	$	680.0		3.4		$	1,416.3	$	1,380.8		2.6			$	703.5	$	703.0		0.1			$	1,397.6	$	1,416.3		(1.3	)
Hips
Americas	$	250.0	$	243.4		2.7	%	$	497.8	$	487.9		2.0		%	$	253.3	$	250.0		1.3		%	$	500.4	$	497.8		0.5		%
EMEA		133.8		130.7		2.2			276.0		266.9		3.4				125.9		133.8		(5.9	)			259.0		276.0		(6.1	)
Asia Pacific		103.1		93.9		9.9			205.1		187.0		9.7				100.2		103.1		(2.8	)			204.2		205.1		(0.5	)
Total	$	486.9	$	468.0		4.0		$	978.9	$	941.8		3.9			$	479.4	$	486.9		(1.5	)		$	963.6	$	978.9		(1.6	)

Increased volume and changes in the mix of product sales had a positive effect of ~~3.5~~3.9 percent and ~~2.3~~3.6 percent on year-over-year sales during the three and six month periods ended June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, respectively. Volume/mix growth was driven by recent product introductions, sales in key emerging markets and an aging population.

We believe long-term indicators point toward sustained growth driven by an aging global population, growth in emerging markets, obesity, proven clinical benefits, new material technologies, advances in surgical techniques and more active lifestyles,

among other factors. In addition, demand for clinically proven premium products, ~~and~~ patient specific devices and robotic surgical assistance are expected to continue to positively affect sales growth in markets that recognize the value of these advanced technologies.

Global selling prices had a negative effect of ~~2.5~~2.7 percent and 2.6 percent on year-over-year sales during the three and six month periods ended June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, respectively. The majority of countries in which we operate continue to experience pricing pressure from governmental healthcare cost containment efforts and from local hospitals and health systems.

For the three and six month periods ended June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, changes in foreign currency exchange rates had a ~~positive~~negative effect of ~~2.0~~2.1 percent and ~~2.9~~2.5 percent, respectively, on year-over-year sales. If foreign currency exchange rates remain at levels consistent with recent rates, we estimate ~~foreign currency exchange rates will have a positive effect for the full year, but~~2019 sales will be ~~slightly negative in the second half of the year.~~negatively affected by 1.25 percent to 1.75 percent.

Knee sales increased minimally in the three ~~and six~~ month ~~periods~~period ended June 30, ~~2018~~2019, but declined in the six month period ended June 30, 2019, when compared to the same prior year ~~periods primarily due to~~periods. Price declines and changes in foreign currency exchange rates ~~and~~negatively impacted sales, but were partially offset by volume/mix growth in ~~the EMEA and Asia Pacific~~all of our geographic operating segments. Knee sales volume/mix growth was led by Persona^®The Personalized Knee System, ~~and~~ the Oxford^® Partial ~~Knee.~~Knee and the ROSA^® Knee System.

Hip sales ~~increased~~declined in the three and six month periods ended June 30, ~~2018~~2019 when compared to the same prior year periods, primarily due to price declines and changes in foreign currency exchange rates, ~~and~~partially offset by volume/mix growth in ~~the Americas and Asia Pacific~~all of our geographic operating segments. Hip sales volume/mix growth was led by our Taperloc^® Complete Hip System, Arcos^® Modular Hip System and G7^® Acetabular System.

Our S.E.T. product category sales increased in the three and six month periods ended June 30, ~~2018~~2019 when compared to the same prior year periods, ~~driven~~ primarily ~~by a growing emphasis on sales force~~due to supply stability, salesforce specialization ~~strong performance~~and new product launches, partially offset by ~~certain key brands and~~ changes in foreign currency exchange ~~rates.~~

~~Dental sales declined in the three~~rates and six month periods ended June 30, 2018 when compared to the same prior year periods. The decline was primarily due to unseasonably high demand in the prior year periods from certain U.S. customers, ongoing stabilization initiatives in certain European markets and product backorders.price declines.

Spine and CMF sales ~~increased~~declined in the three and six month periods ended June 30, ~~2018~~2019 when compared to the same prior year periods, primarily due to price declines, changes in foreign currency exchange rates, and ongoing sales channel consolidation, partially offset by continuing strong sales of our Thoracic ~~products partially offset by a decline~~products.

Dental sales declined in ~~Spine sales driven by U.S. distributor integration issues.~~the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2019 when compared to the same prior year periods mostly due to changes in foreign exchange rates. Volume/mix growth in our Dental product category has improved from recent years due to investing resources in priority areas and other operational improvements.

	Three Months Ended										Six Months Ended										Three Months Ended										Six Months Ended
	June 30,						% Inc /				June 30,						% Inc /				June 30,						% Inc /				June 30,						% Inc /
	2018			2017			(Dec)				2018			2017			(Dec)				2019			2018			(Dec)				2019			2018			(Dec)
Cost of products sold, excluding intangible asset amortization		29.1	%		27.1	%		2.0		%		28.8	%		26.5	%		2.3		%		29.2	%		29.1	%		0.1		%		28.6	%		28.8	%		(0.2	)	%
Intangible asset amortization		7.4			7.6			(0.2	)			7.5			7.6			(0.1	)			7.4			7.4			-				7.3			7.5			(0.2	)
Research and development		4.9			4.8			0.1				4.8			4.7			0.1				5.6			4.9			0.7				5.4			4.8			0.6
Selling, general and administrative		39.4			38.6			0.8				39.6			39.0			0.6				42.3			39.4			2.9				41.3			39.6			1.7
Intangible asset impairment		-			1.4			(1.4	)			-			0.7			(0.7	)			3.5			-			3.5				1.8			-			1.8
Acquisition, integration and related		2.5			3.7			(1.2	)			2.4			3.3			(0.9	)			0.5			2.5			(2.0	)			0.5			2.4			(1.9	)
Quality remediation		1.9			2.6			(0.7	)			2.0			2.1			(0.1	)			1.1			1.9			(0.8	)			1.1			2.0			(0.9	)
Operating profit		14.7			14.4			0.3				14.9			16.0			(1.1	)			10.3			14.7			(4.4	)			14.0			14.9			(0.9	)

The minimal increase in cost of products sold as a percentage of net sales for the three ~~and six~~ month ~~periods~~period ended June 30, ~~2018~~2019 compared to the same prior year ~~periods~~period was primarily due to a $20.8 million charge incurred to terminate a long-term raw material supply agreement in the 2019 period as well as the effects of lower average selling prices and higher manufacturing costs. These unfavorable items were mostly offset by the effects of our hedging program, lower excess and obsolete inventory charges and lower royalty expense. We recognized hedge gains of $7.4 million in the three month period ended June 30, 2019 compared to hedge losses of $10.5 million ~~and $21.6 million recognized~~ in the ~~2018 periods, respectively, compared to hedge gains of $5.9 million and $17.0 million recognized in the 2017 periods, respectively.~~same prior year period. For derivatives which qualify as hedges of future cash flows, the effective portion of changes in fair value is temporarily recorded in other comprehensive income and then recognized in cost of products sold when the hedged items affect earnings. ~~Additional unfavorable factors~~The reduction in royalty expense was the result of an agreement we entered into on April 1, 2019. Under the agreement, we paid $192.5 million to buy out certain licensing arrangements from an unrelated third party. This new agreement and the related payment replace the variable royalty payments that ~~increased cost~~otherwise would have been due under the terms of previous licensing arrangements through 2029. The payment was recorded as an intangible asset and will be amortized through 2029.

Cost of products sold as a percentage of net sales decreased minimally in the six month period ended June 30, 2019 compared to the same prior year period. The drivers of the decrease were the same favorable and unfavorable items as discussed for the three month period ended June 30, 2019. However, the $20.8 million charge to terminate the long-term raw material supply agreement had a lesser negative effect on costs of products sold as a percentage of sales in the six month period ended June 30, 2019 simply due to including the full year-to-date amounts in the ratio.

Intangible asset amortization expense declined in the three and six month periods ended June 30, ~~2018~~2019 when compared to the same prior year periods included lower average selling prices, increased manufacturing costs at our Warsaw North Campus facility and higher excess and obsolete inventory charges. These unfavorable items in the 2018 periods wereperiod due to certain intangible assets from past acquisitions being fully amortized, partially offset by ~~lower inventory step-up charges in those periods. Inventory step-up charges represent~~additional amortization from the difference in cost of products sold between inventory expensed at fair value after business combination accounting is applied versus what cost of products sold would have been had inventory been recognized at historical cost. The reduction in inventory step-up charges during the 2018 periods was primarily the result of the step-upagreement to ~~fair value of the LDR Holding Corporation~~buy out certain licensing arrangements we entered into on April 1, 2019.

Research and development (“~~LDR”~~R&D”) ~~inventory having been fully recognized by September 30, 2017.~~

Intangible asset amortization expense and intangible asset amortization expense as a percentage of net sales remained generally consistent between the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 as there were no significant business combinations in the past year.

~~R&D~~ expenses and R&D expenses as a percentage of net sales increased ~~slightly~~ in the three and six month periods ended June 30, ~~2018~~2019 compared to the same prior year ~~periods,~~period, primarily due to increased investment in our Knee

product ~~pipeline.~~pipeline, costs associated with the European Union Medical Device Regulation and a patent license we acquired to be used in R&D activities that was expensed immediately.

Selling, general and administrative (“SG&A&A”) expenses and SG&A expenses as a percentage of net sales increased in the three and six month periods ended June 30, ~~2018~~2019 when compared to the same prior year periods. The primary drivers of the increased expense were ~~higher sales, increased~~ investments in ~~our specialized sales force and increased~~preparation for new product launches, higher expenses related to ~~our compliance with~~legal entity, distribution and manufacturing restructuring, and higher litigation-related charges from commercial and product liability matters. In the ~~DPA.~~six month period, these increases were partially offset by a $23.5 million gain recognized in the first quarter of 2019 related to a litigation settlement.

In the ~~three month period ended June 30, 2017,~~second quarter of 2019, we recognized ~~$18.8~~a $70.1 million ~~and $8.0 million of~~IPR&D intangible asset impairment ~~from Biomet merger-related in-process research and development and trademark intangible assets, respectively. The impairments were primarily due to the termination of~~on certain IPR&D projects ~~and reclassification of a trademark from an indefinite life to a finite life.~~that we terminated.

Acquisition, integration and related expenses declined in the three and six month periods ended June 30, ~~2018~~2019 compared to the same prior year periods due to the natural regression of integration activities related to the 2015 Biomet merger and other various acquisitions that were consummated in 2016. WeSimilarly, our quality remediation expenses have declined as projects related to those efforts are ~~nearing completion of our integration plans for these businesses.~~

Our quality enhancement and remediation efforts began in late 2016, accelerated throughout 2017 and will continue throughout 2018. These costs primarily relate to fees paid to temporary external consultants engaged to assist in the remediation of our Warsaw North Campus facility.completed.

In the three and six month periods ended June 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017,~~2018, other expense, net, was primarily related to certain components of pension expense, changes to the fair value of our equity investments and remeasuring monetary assets and liabilities denominated in a foreign currency other than an entity’s functional currency, partially offset by foreign currency forward exchange contracts we entered into to mitigate any gain or loss.

32Interest expense, net, decreased in the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2019, compared to the same prior year periods, primarily due to hedging strategies that have lowered our effective interest rate and lower average outstanding debt balances during the 2019 periods resulting from debt repayments throughout 2018 and year-to-date 2019.

~~loss. The increased expense~~In the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2019, our effective tax rate (“ETR”) was 6.0 percent and 12.5 percent, respectively, compared to 15.1 percent and 18.2 percent in the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2018, ~~compared to the same prior year periods was primarily caused by higher foreign currency losses.~~

~~Net interest expense decreased~~respectively. The decline in the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2018, compared to the same prior year periods, primarily due to lower average outstanding debt balances during the 2018 periods resulting from debt repayments throughout 2017.

~~In the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2018, our effective tax rate (“ETR”) was 15.1 percent and 18.2 percent, respectively. In~~ETR in the three month period ended June 30, ~~2018, we recognized a tax benefit related~~2019 compared to ~~adjustments from internal restructuring transactions. Other than this tax benefit, our ETR approximates~~ the ~~U.S. federal income tax rate for both the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2018. In the~~same prior year ~~periods, we had~~period was primarily due to the favorable resolution of certain ~~discrete adjustments that significantly impacted our ETR. In~~tax audits. The decline in ETR in the six month period ended June 30, ~~2017, we recognized a tax benefit of $69.7 million resulting from a tax restructuring that lowered~~2019 compared to the ~~tax rate on certain deferred tax liabilities recorded on intangible assets recognized in~~same prior year period was primarily due to the ~~Biomet merger acquisition-related accounting. In the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2017, we recognized tax benefits of $67.0 million and $88.8 million, respectively, related to~~favorable resolution of certain tax ~~matters. In addition,~~audits as well as a release of uncertain tax positions due to emerging foreign tax guidance in the first quarter. Absent discrete tax events, we expect our prior year ETR was affected by the significant expenses associated with the Biomet merger and other acquisitions which have generally been recognized in higher income tax jurisdictions. Accordingly, this has reduced our ETR as our earnings have been lower in these higher income tax jurisdictions.

~~Our~~ future ETR ~~is expected~~will continue to be ~~unfavorably impacted by~~lower than the ~~2017 Tax Act as we establish an estimate for a new~~ U.S. ~~tax on certain off-shore earnings, referred to as GILTI, at an effective~~corporate income tax rate of ~~10.5~~21.0 percent ~~for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017 (increasing to 13.125 percent for tax years beginning after December 31, 2025), with a partial offset from foreign tax credits. See Note 11~~due to our ~~interim condensed consolidated financial statements included in Part I, Item 1~~mix of ~~this report for further details related to the 2017 Tax Act.~~earnings between U.S. and foreign locations, which have lower corporate income tax rates. Our ETR in future periods could also potentially be impacted byby: changes in our mix of pre-tax earnings; changes in tax rates, tax laws or their interpretation, including the European Union rules on state aid; the outcome of various federal, state and foreign audits; and the expiration of certain statutes of limitations. Currently, we cannot reasonably estimate the impact of these items on our financial results.

									Operating Profit as a														Operating Profit as a
	Net Sales				Operating Profit				Percentage of Net Sales						Net Sales				Operating Profit				Percentage of Net Sales
	Three Months Ended				Three Months Ended				Three Months Ended						Three Months Ended				Three Months Ended				Three Months Ended
	June 30,				June 30,				June 30,						June 30,				June 30,				June 30,
(dollars in millions)	2018		2017		2018		2017		2018			2017			2019		2018		2019		2018		2019			2018
Americas	$	979.3	$	969.2	$	516.3	$	523.6		52.7	%		54.0	%	$	989.1	$	979.3	$	538.8	$	530.1		54.5	%		54.1	%
EMEA		400.0		380.4		118.6		118.9		29.7			31.3			383.2		400.0		116.9		117.5		30.5			29.4
Asia Pacific		319.2		292.2		112.3		111.8		35.2			38.3			321.9		319.2		114.8		109.7		35.7			34.4

									Operating Profit as a
	Net Sales				Operating Profit				Percentage of Net Sales														Operating Profit as a
	Six Months Ended				Six Months Ended				Six Months Ended						Net Sales				Operating Profit				Percentage of Net Sales
	June 30,				June 30,				June 30,						Six Months Ended				Six Months Ended				Six Months Ended
															June 30,				June 30,				June 30,
(dollars in millions)	2018		2017		2018		2017		2018			2017			2019		2018		2019		2018		2019			2018
Americas	$	1,970.4	$	1,969.8	$	1,035.2	$	1,064.8		52.5	%		54.1	%	$	1,964.5	$	1,970.4	$	1,045.9	$	1,062.3		53.2	%		53.9	%
EMEA		832.6		773.1		259.0		248.6		31.1			32.2			789.1		832.6		243.3		256.7		30.8			30.8
Asia Pacific		618.1		568.8		216.7		211.8		35.1			37.2			625.6		618.1		218.8		211.8		35.0			34.3

In the Americas, operating profit as a percentage of net sales ~~decreased~~increased in the three ~~and six~~ month ~~periods~~period ended June 30, ~~2018~~2019 compared to the same prior year ~~periods~~period, but decreased in the six month period ended June 30, 2019. The increase in the three month period was primarily due to improved sales volume/mix and controlled spending. In the six month period, the decline was primarily due to price declines and higher excess and obsolete inventory ~~charges caused by the Warsaw North Campus facility supply issues and quality remediation efforts.~~

charges. In EMEA, operating profit as a percentage of net sales increased in the three month period ended June 30, 2019 compared to the same prior year period and was flat in the six month period ended June 30, 2019. The increase in the three month period was primarily due to higher sales volume/mix and gains recognized related to our hedging program. In Asia Pacific, operating profit as a percentage of net sales ~~decreased~~increased in the three and six month periods ended June 30, ~~2018 compared~~2019 due primarily to ~~the same prior year periods primarily due to price declines~~volume/mix net sales growth and ~~hedge losses recognized in the current year periods versus hedge~~ gains recognized ~~in the prior year periods.~~ related to our hedging program.

We use financial measures that differ from financial measures determined in accordance with GAAP to evaluate our operating performance. These non-GAAP financial measures exclude the impact of ~~inventory step-up;~~ certain inventory and manufacturing-related charges including charges to terminate a long-term raw material supply agreement and discontinue certain product lines; intangible asset amortization; intangible asset impairment; acquisition, integration and related expenses; quality remediation expenses; certain litigation gains and charges; expenses to comply with the new European Union Medical Device Regulation; other charges; any related effects on our income tax provision associated with these items; and other certain tax adjustments. We use these non-GAAP financial measures internally to evaluate the performance of the business. Additionally, we believe these non-GAAP measures provide meaningful incremental information to investors to consider when evaluating our performance. We believe these measures offer the ability to make period-to-period comparisons that are not impacted by certain items that can cause dramatic changes in reported income but that do not impact the fundamentals of our operations. The non-GAAP measures enable the evaluation of operating results and trend analysis by allowing a reader to better identify operating trends that may otherwise be masked or distorted by these types of items that are excluded from the non-GAAP measures. In addition, adjusted diluted ~~net~~ earnings per share ~~are~~is used as a performance ~~metrics~~metric in our incentive compensation programs.

The following are reconciliations from our GAAP net earnings and diluted earnings per share to our non-GAAP adjusted net earnings and non-GAAP adjusted diluted earnings per share used for internal management purposes (in millions, except per share amounts):

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended						Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,						June 30,						June 30,
	2018			2017			2018			2017			2019			2018			2019			2018
Net Earnings of Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc.	$	185.0		$	184.2		$	359.7		$	483.6		$	133.7		$	185.0		$	379.8		$	359.7
Inventory step-up and other inventory and manufacturing-related charges⁽¹⁾		12.5			22.5			19.7			41.2
Inventory and manufacturing-related charges⁽¹⁾														34.1			12.5			36.1			19.7
Intangible asset amortization⁽²⁾		149.5			147.7			300.3			299.7			146.9			149.5			290.3			300.3
Intangible asset impairment⁽³⁾		-			26.8			-			26.8			70.1			-			70.1			-
Acquisition, integration and related⁽⁴⁾		50.5			72.5			96.5			130.7			10.5			50.5			21.2			96.5
Quality remediation⁽⁵⁾		45.4			52.3			91.6			91.2			23.4			45.4			43.1			91.6
Litigation⁽⁶⁾		(4.2	)		-			1.5			7.0			7.0			(4.2	)		5.2			1.5
Other charges⁽⁷⁾		11.8			8.8			22.7			20.8
Taxes on above items⁽⁸⁾		(44.8	)		(102.2	)		(95.4	)		(185.2	)
Other certain tax adjustments⁽⁹⁾		(13.7	)		12.0			(13.7	)		(57.8	)
Litigation settlement gain⁽⁷⁾														-			-			(23.5	)		-
European Union Medical Device Regulation⁽⁸⁾														5.1			0.5			6.7			0.8
Other charges⁽⁹⁾														42.8			11.3			64.9			21.9
Taxes on above items⁽¹⁰⁾														(69.8	)		(44.7	)		(100.6	)		(95.4	)
Other certain tax adjustments⁽¹¹⁾														(6.1	)		(13.8	)		(11.4	)		(13.7	)
Adjusted Net Earnings	$	392.0		$	424.6		$	782.9		$	858.0		$	397.7		$	392.0		$	781.9		$	782.9

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended						Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,						June 30,						June 30,
	2018			2017			2018			2017			2019			2018			2019			2018
Diluted Earnings Per Share	$	0.90		$	0.90		$	1.76		$	2.38		$	0.65		$	0.90		$	1.84		$	1.76
Inventory step-up and other inventory and manufacturing-related charges⁽¹⁾		0.06			0.11			0.10			0.20
Inventory and manufacturing-related charges⁽¹⁾														0.17			0.06			0.18			0.10
Intangible asset amortization⁽²⁾		0.73			0.73			1.47			1.47			0.71			0.73			1.41			1.47
Intangible asset impairment⁽³⁾		-			0.13			-			0.13			0.34			-			0.34			-
Acquisition, integration and related⁽⁴⁾		0.25			0.36			0.47			0.64			0.05			0.25			0.10			0.47
Quality remediation⁽⁵⁾		0.22			0.26			0.45			0.45			0.11			0.22			0.21			0.45
Litigation⁽⁶⁾		(0.02	)		-			0.01			0.04			0.03			(0.02	)		0.03			0.01
Other charges⁽⁷⁾		0.06			0.04			0.11			0.10
Taxes on above items⁽⁸⁾		(0.22	)		(0.51	)		(0.47	)		(0.91	)
Other certain tax adjustments⁽⁹⁾		(0.06	)		0.06			(0.07	)		(0.28	)
Litigation settlement gain⁽⁷⁾														-			-			(0.11	)		-
European Union Medical Device Regulation⁽⁸⁾														0.02			-			0.03			-
Other charges⁽⁹⁾														0.21			0.06			0.32			0.11
Taxes on above items⁽¹⁰⁾														(0.34	)		(0.22	)		(0.50	)		(0.47	)
Other certain tax adjustments⁽¹¹⁾														(0.02	)		(0.06	)		(0.05	)		(0.07	)
Adjusted Diluted Earnings Per Share	$	1.92		$	2.08		$	3.83		$	4.22		$	1.93		$	1.92		$	3.80		$	3.83

Cash flows provided by operating activities were ~~$883.8~~$584.6 million in the six month period ended June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, compared to ~~$715.9~~$883.8 million in the same prior year period. The ~~increase~~decrease was ~~driven by additional cash flows from~~primarily due to an approximate $168 million payment on a patent infringement lawsuit as well as other product liability-related payments we made in the 2019 period. Additionally, in the prior year period, we continued to expand our sale of accounts receivable in certain countries ~~as well as certain significant payments made in the 2017 period. In the 2017 period, we made payments related~~which provided additional cash inflows, compared to the ~~U.S. Durom Cup Settlement Program,~~2019 period where our sales of accounts receivable have not expanded significantly and ~~we paid $30.5 million in Settlement Payments~~therefore the incremental benefits to resolve previously-disclosed FCPA matters involving Biomet and certain of its subsidiaries as discussed in Note 15 to our interim condensed consolidated financial statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this report.the period are less.

Cash flows used in investing activities were ~~$195.3~~$427.7 million in the six month period ended June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, compared to ~~$262.1~~$195.3 million in the same prior year period. Instrument and property, plant and equipment additions reflected ongoing investments in our product portfolio and optimization of our manufacturing and logistics network. Additionally, we paid $197.6 million to buy out certain licensing arrangements from unrelated third parties.

Cash flows used in financing activities were ~~$729.0~~$298.8 million in the six month period ended June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, compared to ~~$656.9~~$729.0 million in the same prior year period. In the 2019 period, we borrowed $200.0 million on U.S. Term Loan C and used those proceeds, along with cash on hand, to pay the remaining balance of $225.0 million on U.S. Term Loan B. Additionally, we repaid $200.0 million on U.S. Term Loan C in the 2019 period with cash generated from operations. In the 2018 period, we ~~issued~~received net proceeds of $749.5 million from the issuance of additional senior notes and borrowed $400.0 million from our Multicurrency Revolving Facility to repay $1,150.0 million of senior notes that became due on April 2, 2018. We repaid $375.0 million of the Multicurrency Revolving Facility borrowings and also repaid $225.0 million on ~~U.S. Term Loan A~~a term loan in the 2018 period. In the ~~2017~~2019 period, we borrowed and subsequently repaid $400.0 million on our Multicurrency Revolving Facility in order to repay $500.0 million of senior notes that became due on April 1, 2017. In the 2018 period, we also had net cash outflows of ~~$62.9~~$25.6 million related to our factoring programs caused by the timing differences of collections from customers and repayments to the financial institution to which we sold the collected receivables. The 2019 outflow was lower than the prior year based upon the timing of when receivable sales occurred in December of 2018 compared to December of 2017.

In February and May ~~2018,~~2019, our Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.24 per share. We expect to continue paying cash dividends on a quarterly basis; however, future dividends are subject to approval of the Board of Directors and may be adjusted as business needs or market conditions change. Additionally, our debt facilities restrict the payment of dividends in certain circumstances.

In February 2016, our Board of Directors authorized a new $1.0 billion share repurchase program effective March 1, 2016, with no expiration date. The previous program expired on February 29, 2016. As of June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, all $1.0 billion remained authorized.

We will continue to exercise disciplined capital allocation designed to drive stockholder value creation. We intend to use available cash for debt repayment, reinvestment in the business ~~debt repayment~~ and dividends. If the right opportunities arise, we may also use available cash to pursue business development opportunities.

As discussed in Note 1113 to our interim condensed consolidated financial statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this report, the IRS has issued proposed adjustments for years 2005 through 2012, reallocating profits between certain of our U.S. and foreign subsidiaries. We have disputed these proposed adjustments and intend to continue to vigorously defend our positions. Although the ultimate timing for resolution of the disputed tax issues is uncertain, future payments may be significant to our operating cash flows.

Also, as discussed in Note 1517 to our interim condensed consolidated financial statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this report, as of June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, a short-term liability of ~~$48.9~~$19.5 million and a long-term liability of ~~$70.5~~$54.0 million related to Durom Cup product liability claims were recorded on our condensed consolidated balance sheet. We expect to continue paying these claims over the next few years. We maintain insurance for product liability claims, subject to self-insurance retention requirements. We have recovered insurance proceeds from certain of our insurance carriers for Durom Cup-related claims. While we may recover additional insurance proceeds in the future for Durom Cup-related claims, we do not have a receivable recorded on our condensed consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, ~~2018~~2019 for any possible future insurance recoveries for these claims. As of June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, we also had a ~~short-term~~ liability of ~~$41.4~~$64.3 million related to Biomet metal-on-metal hip implant claims.

At June 30, ~~2018, we had twelve tranches~~2019, our outstanding debt consisted of senior notes ~~outstanding~~and term loans as follows ~~(dollars~~(principal shown in U.S. Dollars in millions):

Interest

Principal

Rate

Maturity Date
$
500.0

4.625

November 30, 2019

1,500.0

2.700

April 1, 2020

450.0

Floating

March 19, 2021

300.0

3.375

November 30, 2021

750.0

3.150

April 1, 2022

583.8

*

1.414

December 13, 2022

300.0

3.700

March 19, 2023

2,000.0

3.550

April 1, 2025

583.8

*

2.425

December 13, 2026

253.4

4.250

August 15, 2035

317.8

5.750

November 30, 2039

395.4

4.450

August 15, 2045

Interest

Type

Principal

Currency

Rate

Maturity Date

Notes

500.0

U.S. Dollar

4.625

November 30, 2019

Notes

1,500.0

U.S. Dollar

2.700

April 1, 2020

Term

535.0

U.S. Dollar

Floating

December 14, 2020

Notes

450.0

U.S. Dollar

Floating

March 19, 2021

Notes

300.0

U.S. Dollar

3.375

November 30, 2021

Notes

750.0

U.S. Dollar

3.150

April 1, 2022

Term

108.7

Japanese Yen

0.635

September 27, 2022

Term

197.9

Japanese Yen

0.635

September 27, 2022

Notes

569.4

Euro

1.414

December 13, 2022

Notes

300.0

U.S. Dollar

3.700

March 19, 2023

Notes

2,000.0

U.S. Dollar

3.550

April 1, 2025

Notes

569.4

Euro

2.425

December 13, 2026

Notes

253.4

U.S. Dollar

4.250

August 15, 2035

Notes

317.8

U.S. Dollar

5.750

November 30, 2039

Notes

395.4

U.S. Dollar

4.450

August 15, 2045

~~We also had four term loans with total principal of $1,583.7 million outstanding as of June 30, 2018.~~

We have a $1.5 billion Multicurrency Revolving Facility that will mature on September 30, 2021. There were ~~$25.0 million in~~no outstanding borrowings under this facility as of June 30, ~~2018.~~2019. We also have other available uncommitted credit facilities totaling ~~$53.3~~$51.7 million as of June 30, ~~2018.~~2019.

We plan to use cash generated from operations to continue servicing our debt obligations through at least the remainder of this year. We have $500.0 million principal amount of notes due November 30, 2019 and $1.5 billion principal amount of notes due April 1, 2020. We believe we can satisfy these debt obligations with cash generated from our operations, by issuing new debt, or by borrowing on our Multicurrency Revolving Facility. We believe that our earnings, balance sheet and cash flows will allow us to obtain additional capital, if necessary, to satisfy these debt obligations.

For additional information on our debt, see Note 79 to our interim condensed consolidated financial statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this report.

We place our cash and cash equivalents in highly-rated financial institutions and limit the amount of credit exposure to any one entity. We invest only in high-quality financial instruments in accordance with our internal investment policy.

As of June 30, ~~2018, $331.9~~2019, $346.8 million of our cash and cash equivalents were held in jurisdictions outside of the U.S. Of this amount, ~~$68.0~~$94.3 million is denominated in U.S. Dollars and, therefore, bears no foreign currency translation risk. The balance of these assets is denominated in currencies of the various countries where we operate. We intend to repatriate at least ~~$3.6~~$5.1 billion of unremitted earnings in future years.

Our concentrations of credit risks with respect to trade accounts receivable is limited due to the large number of customers and their dispersion across a number of geographic areas and by frequent monitoring of the creditworthiness of the customers to whom credit is granted in the normal course of business. Substantially all of our trade receivables are concentrated in the public and private hospital and healthcare industry in the U.S. and internationally or with distributors or dealers who operate in international markets and, accordingly, are exposed to their respective business, economic and country-specific variables.

Management believes that cash flows from operations and available borrowings under the Multicurrency Revolving Facility are sufficient to meet our working capital, capital expenditure and debt service needs, as well as return cash to stockholders in the form of dividends and share repurchases. Should additional investment opportunities arise, we believe that our earnings, balance sheet and cash flows will allow us to obtain additional capital, if necessary.

Information pertaining to recent accounting pronouncements can be found in Note 2 to our interim condensed consolidated financial statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this report.

Our financial results are affected by the selection and application of accounting policies and methods. There were no changes in the three or six month periods ended June 30, ~~2018~~2019 to the application of critical accounting policies as described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2017.~~2018.

In the fourth quarter of ~~2017,~~2018, we recognized a ~~$272.0~~$567.0 million goodwill impairment charge related to our ~~Spine, less Asia Pacific~~EMEA reporting unit. The impairment charge represented the amount by which the reporting unit’s carrying value exceeded its estimated fair value. We estimated the fair value of the reporting unit based on income and market approaches. Since the carrying value of this reporting unit was written down to its estimated fair value, future impairment could occur if the estimates used in the income and market approaches change. If our estimates of profitability in the reporting unit decline, the fair value estimate under the income approach will decline. If there are negative outlooks of the broader economic environment, comparable company valuation indicators may decline, which would cause our fair value estimate under the market approach to decline. The ~~lowering~~goodwill balance of our EMEA reporting unit was $754.7 million at June 30, 2019.

Additionally, in our annual impairment test in the ~~U.S. corporate income tax rate subsequent~~fourth quarter of 2018, our Dental reporting unit’s fair value exceeded its carrying value by less than 5 percent. If our future operating results are below the estimations used for our impairment assessment, or there are negative impacts from the broader economic environment, then we may have to ~~the~~recognize goodwill impairment ~~charge will provide a benefit to the future profitability estimates for~~charges on this reporting ~~unit. However, any inability to execute on~~unit in the future. The goodwill balance of our ~~operating plans could more than offset any favorable cash flows from lower U.S. corporate income tax rates.~~Dental reporting unit was $386.8 million at June 30, 2019.

We have ~~five~~three other reporting units that have goodwill assigned to them. As of the date of our last goodwill impairment test, each of the ~~five~~three reporting unit’s estimated fair value exceeded its carrying value by more than 1025 percent.

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements and Factors That May Affect Future Results

This quarterly report contains certain statements that are forward-looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws. Forward-looking statements can be identified by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts. When used in this report, the words “may,” “will,” “can,” “should,” “would,” “could,” “anticipate,” “expect,” “plan,” “seek,” “believe,” “are confident that,” “predict,” “estimate,” “potential,” “project,” “target,” “forecast,” “intend,” “strategy,” “future,” “opportunity,” “assume,” “guide,” ~~“position”~~“position,” “continue” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are based on current beliefs, expectations and assumptions that are subject to significant risks, uncertainties and changes in circumstances that could cause actual results to differ materially from such forward-looking statements. These risks, uncertainties and changes in circumstances include, but are not limited to:

Our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2017 contains~~2018 and this report contain detailed discussions of these and other important factors under the heading “Risk Factors.” You should understand that it is not possible to predict or identify all factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from forward-looking statements. Consequently, you should not consider any list or discussion of such factors to be a complete set of all potential risks or uncertainties.

Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made and we expressly disclaim any obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Readers of this report are cautioned not to rely on these forward-looking statements since there can be no assurance that these forward-looking statements will prove to be accurate. This cautionary statement is applicable to all forward-looking statements contained in this report.

There have been no material changes from the information provided in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2017.~~2018.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. We maintain disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”)) that are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures. Because of inherent limitations, disclosure controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, and not absolute, assurance that the objectives of disclosure controls and procedures are met.

Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at a reasonable assurance level.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.T~~here~~There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended June 30, ~~2018~~2019 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. As previously reported, on January 1, 2019 we adopted ASU 2016-02 – Leases (Topic 842). This ASU requires lessees to recognize right-of-use assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet. As a result, we added additional internal controls to comply with the new standard in the first quarter of 2019.

Information pertaining to legal proceedings can be found in Note 1517 to our interim condensed consolidated financial statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this report and is incorporated herein by reference.

~~There~~Except as set forth below, there have been no material changes in our risk factors from those disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2017.~~2018. The risk factor set forth below replaces in its entirety the risk factor with the same title:

We incurred substantial additional indebtedness in connection with previous mergers and acquisitions and may not be able to meet all of our debt obligations.

We incurred substantial additional indebtedness in connection with previous mergers and acquisitions. At June 30, 2019, our total indebtedness was $8.7 billion, as compared to $1.4 billion at December 31, 2014. As of June 30, 2019, our debt service obligations, comprised of principal and interest (excluding leases and equipment notes), during the next 12 months are expected to be $2.2 billion. As a result of the increase in our debt, demands on our cash resources have increased. The increased level of debt could, among other things:

In addition, the annual interest rates applicable to certain of our debt obligations are based on a fluctuating rate of interest determined by reference to the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”). Any increase in interest rates applicable to our debt obligations would increase our cost of borrowing and could adversely affect our financial position, results of operations or cash flows. Further, in July 2017, the U.K.’s Financial Conduct Authority, which regulates LIBOR, announced that it intends to stop persuading or compelling banks to submit rates for the calculation of LIBOR after 2021. In response to concerns regarding the future of LIBOR, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York convened the Alternative Reference Rates Committee (“ARRC”) to identify alternatives to LIBOR. The ARRC has recommended a benchmark replacement waterfall to assist issuers in continued capital market entry while safeguarding against LIBOR’s discontinuation. The initial steps in the ARRC’s recommended provision reference variations of the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”). At this time, it is not possible to predict whether SOFR will attain market traction as a LIBOR replacement. Additionally, it is uncertain if LIBOR will cease to exist after calendar year 2021, or whether additional reforms to LIBOR may be enacted, or whether alternative reference rates will gain market acceptance as a replacement for LIBOR. At this time, all of our debt obligations that are based on LIBOR will mature before the end of 2021. We will continue to monitor the situation and address the potential reference rate changes in future debt obligations that we may incur. Accordingly, the potential effect of the phase-out or replacement of LIBOR on our cost of capital cannot yet be determined.

During the three month period ended June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors approved the engagement of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm, to perform certain non-audit services. This disclosure is made pursuant to Section 10A(i)(2) of the Exchange Act, as added by Section 202 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


Title of each class	Trading Symbol(s)	Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, $0.01 par value	ZBH	New York Stock Exchange
1.414% Notes due 2022	ZBH 22A	New York Stock Exchange
2.425% Notes due 2026	ZBH 26	New York Stock Exchange

Large accelerated filer	☒	Accelerated filer	☐

Non-accelerated filer	☐ ~~(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)~~	Smaller reporting company	☐

Emerging growth company	☐

		Page

Part I - Financial Information

Item 1.	Financial Statements (unaudited)	3
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Earnings for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2019 and 2018	3
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2019 and 2018	4
	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018	5
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2019 and 2018	6
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2019 and 2018	7
	Notes to Interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	8

Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	29

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	40

Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	40

Part II - Other Information

Item 1.	~~Financial Statements (unaudited)~~Legal Proceedings	342
	~~Condensed Consolidated Statements of Earnings for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2018 and 2017~~	3
	~~Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2018 and 2017~~	4
Item 1A.	~~Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017~~Risk Factors	5
	~~Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2018 and 2017~~	6
	~~Notes to Interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements~~	742

Item 2.	~~Management’s Discussion~~Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and ~~Analysis~~Use of ~~Financial Condition and Results of Operations~~Proceeds	2842

Item 3.	~~Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk~~Defaults Upon Senior Securities	3942

Item 4.	~~Controls and Procedures~~Mine Safety Disclosures	39

~~Part II - Other Information~~

~~Item 1.~~	~~Legal Proceedings~~	40

~~Item 1A.~~	~~Risk Factors~~	40

~~Item 2.~~	~~Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds~~	40

~~Item 3.~~	~~Defaults Upon Senior Securities~~	40

~~Item 4.~~	~~Mine Safety Disclosures~~	4043

Item 5.	Other Information	4043

Item 6.	Exhibits	4144

Signatures		4245

	June 30,			December 31,			June 30,			December 31,
	2018			2017			2019			2018
	(in millions)						(in millions)
Land	$	28.8		$	29.0		$	27.9		$	28.0
Buildings and equipment		1,904.2			1,838.5			1,954.3			1,885.6
Capitalized software costs		430.9			421.6			457.6			425.8
Instruments		2,828.3			2,683.9			3,137.0			2,950.5
Construction in progress		94.2			110.7			140.9			147.2
		5,286.4			5,083.7			5,717.7			5,437.1
Accumulated depreciation		(3,299.5	)		(3,045.1	)		(3,681.9	)		(3,421.7	)
Property, plant and equipment, net	$	1,986.9		$	2,038.6		$	2,035.8		$	2,015.4

	Three Months Ended		Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2019		June 30, 2019
Lease cost	$	18.4	$	37.0
Cash paid for leases recognized in operating cash flows	$	18.4	$	37.2
Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for new lease liabilities	$	10.6	$	16.4

				New			New
	As			Revenue			Pension
	Previously			Standard			Standard						As
(in millions)	Reported			Adjustment			Adjustment			Reclassifications			Restated
Statement of Earnings
Three Months Ended June 30, 2017


Net Sales	$	1,954.4		$	(4.9	)	$	-		$	-		$	1,949.5
Research and development		90.1			-			-			2.5			92.6
Selling, general and administrative		748.0			(4.9	)		2.2			6.9			752.2
Intangible asset impairment		-			-			-			26.8			26.8
Acquisition, integration and related		-			-			-			72.5			72.5
Quality remediation		-			-			-			49.9			49.9
Special items		158.6			-			-			(158.6	)		-
Operating expenses		1,672.1			(4.9	)		2.2			-			1,669.4
Operating Profit		282.3			-			(2.2	)		-			280.1
Other expense, net		(3.9	)		-			2.2			-			(1.7	)

	As of
	June 30, 2019
Right-of-use assets recognized in Other assets	$	257.6
Lease liabilities recognized in Other current liabilities	$	62.5
Lease liabilities recognized in Other long-term liabilities	$	205.4
Weighted-average remaining lease term	6.2 years
Weighted-average discount rate		2.7	%

For the Years Ending December 31,
2019 (July 1, 2019 to December 31, 2019)	$	35.4
2020		61.8
2021		48.3
2022		34.1
2023		28.7
Thereafter		84.8
Total		293.1
Less imputed interest		25.2
Total	$	267.9

For the Years Ending December 31,
2019	$	67.1
2020		56.9
2021		44.1
2022		32.2
2023		27.7
Thereafter		81.6

	Foreign			Cash			Defined
	Currency			Flow			Benefit			Total
	Translation			Hedges			Plan Items			AOCI
Balance at December 31, 2017	$	121.5		$	(66.5	)	$	(138.2	)	$	(83.2	)
AOCI before reclassifications		(83.0	)		25.2			(3.8	)		(61.6	)
Reclassifications to retained earnings (Note 2)		(17.4	)		(4.4	)		(21.1	)		(42.9	)
Reclassifications to statement of earnings		-			18.9			5.8			24.7
Balance at June 30, 2018	$	21.1		$	(26.8	)	$	(157.3	)	$	(163.0	)

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2017									Six Months Ended June 30, 2017
	Before Tax			Tax			Net of Tax			Before Tax			Tax			Net of Tax
Foreign currency cumulative translation adjustments	$	215.3		$	26.1		$	189.2		$	269.7		$	31.5		$	238.2
Unrealized cash flow hedge (losses)		(26.5	)		(1.7	)		(24.8	)		(63.1	)		(12.0	)		(51.1	)
Reclassification adjustments on cash flow hedges		(5.7	)		(1.2	)		(4.5	)		(16.7	)		(3.2	)		(13.5	)
Adjustments to prior service cost and unrecognized actuarial assumptions		0.2			0.7			(0.5	)		(3.5	)		0.5			(4.0	)
Total Other Comprehensive Income	$	183.3		$	23.9		$	159.4		$	186.4		$	16.8		$	169.6

	Level 3 - Liabilities
Contingent payments related to acquisitions
Beginning balance December 31, 2017	$	41.0
Change in estimate		0.3
Settlements		(17.8	)
Ending balance June 30, 2018	$	23.5

	Carrying Amount of the Hedged Liabilites				Cumulative Amount of Fair Value Hedging Adjustment Included in the Carrying Amount of the Hedged Liabilities				Carrying Amount of the Hedged Liabilities				Cumulative Amount of Fair Value Hedging Adjustment Included in the Carrying Amount of the Hedged Liabilities
Balance Sheet Line Item	June 30, 2018		December 31, 2017		June 30, 2018		December 31, 2017		June 30, 2019		December 31, 2018		June 30, 2019		December 31, 2018
Long-term debt	$	568.6	$	572.8	$	18.9	$	23.1	$	560.3	$	564.4	$	10.4	$	14.6

3.1		Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc., dated June 24, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 26, 2015)

3.2		Restated By-Laws of Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc., effective June 24, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 26, 2015)

10.1*4.1		~~Restated Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. Executive Severance Plan~~Specimen Common Stock Certificate

10.2*10.1		~~Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award~~First Amendment to Aircraft Time Sharing Agreement ~~(two-year cliff vesting) under the~~by and between Zimmer, Inc. and Bryan C. Hanson

10.2		Offer letter between Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. ~~2009 Stock Incentive Plan~~and Suketu Upadhyay dated June 13, 2019 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 19, 2019)

10.3		Form of Change in Control Severance Agreement with Suketu Upadhyay (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed February 26, 2019)

10.4		Form of Confidentiality, Non-Competition and Non-Solicitation Agreement with Suketu Upadhyay (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed February 26, 2019)

21		List of Subsidiaries of Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc.

31.1		Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 of the Chief Executive Officer, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

31.2		Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 of the Chief Financial Officer, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32		Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

99		~~Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan (As amended and restated effective June 1, 2018)~~

101.INS		XBRL Instance Document – The instance document does not appear in the interactive data file because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document

101.SCH		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

101.CAL		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

101.LAB		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document

101.PRE		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

101.DEF		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document


* Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement

	ZIMMER BIOMET HOLDINGS, INC.

	(Registrant)

Date: August ~~6, 2018~~5, 2019	By:	/s/ ~~Daniel P. Florin~~Suketu Upadhyay
		~~Daniel P. Florin~~Suketu Upadhyay
		Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

~~Date: August 6, 2018~~		~~By:~~		~~/s/ Tony W. Collins~~
				~~Tony W. Collins~~(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)