Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

As of ~~October 25, 2019,~~May 1, 2020, there were ~~37,783,761~~38,117,397 shares of Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, outstanding.

	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended						Three Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,						March 31,
	2019			2018			2019			2018			2020			2019
Net sales	$	1,104.4		$	1,250.0		$	3,540.1		$	3,248.4		$	1,010.3		$	1,230.8
Cost of materials sold		900.0			1,041.8			2,892.6			2,690.0			814.5			999.5
Gross profit		204.4			208.2			647.5			558.4			195.8			231.3
Warehousing, delivery, selling, general, and administrative		165.6			174.0			493.9			443.4			155.7			163.7
Gain on insurance settlement		(1.5	)		—			(1.5	)		—
Restructuring and other charges		0.3			2.7			1.7			2.7			—			0.3
Operating profit		40.0			31.5			153.4			112.3			40.1			67.3
Other income and (expense), net		(0.3	)		74.2			(1.3	)		78.9			0.9			(0.8	)
Interest and other expense on debt		(23.2	)		(26.0	)		(71.0	)		(73.2	)		(21.7	)		(23.9	)
Income before income taxes		16.5			79.7			81.1			118.0			19.3			42.6
Provision for income taxes		6.3			2.0			24.8			12.3			2.9			13.0
Net income		10.2			77.7			56.3			105.7			16.4			29.6
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest		0.1			0.2			0.3			0.3			—			0.1
Net income attributable to Ryerson Holding Corporation	$	10.1		$	77.5		$	56.0		$	105.4		$	16.4		$	29.5
Comprehensive income	$	9.2		$	80.0		$	59.8		$	104.8		$	6.2		$	33.1
Less: Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interest		—			0.1			0.3			0.3			—			0.2
Comprehensive income attributable to Ryerson Holding Corporation	$	9.2		$	79.9		$	59.5		$	104.5		$	6.2		$	32.9
Basic earnings per share	$	0.27		$	2.08		$	1.49		$	2.83		$	0.43		$	0.79
Diluted earnings per share	$	0.27		$	2.06		$	1.48		$	2.80		$	0.43		$	0.78

	Nine Months Ended						Three Months Ended
	September 30,						March 31,
	2019			2018			2020			2019
Operating activities:
Net income	$	56.3		$	105.7		$	16.4		$	29.6
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		44.3			37.2			13.3			14.2
Stock-based compensation		2.4			2.6			0.6			0.8
Deferred income taxes		41.4			8.3			14.6			11.9
Provision for allowances, claims, and doubtful accounts		2.5			1.5			1.4			1.3
Restructuring and other charges		1.7			2.7			—			0.3
Gain on insurance settlement		(1.5	)		—
Gain on bargain purchase		—			(73.2	)
Loss on retirement of debt		0.2			—
Non-cash loss from derivatives		8.2			0.1
Pension settlement charge								0.4			0.1
(Gain) loss on retirement of debt								(0.8	)		0.2
Non-cash (gain) loss from derivatives								2.7			(2.8	)
Other items		0.8			0.5			(0.1	)		0.3
Change in operating assets and liabilities:
Receivables		12.4			(148.9	)		(69.4	)		(69.8	)
Inventories		(5.1	)		(116.4	)		(4.1	)		(69.5	)
Other assets		4.3			(1.0	)		5.1			1.0
Accounts payable		(1.6	)		117.9			98.5			81.0
Accrued liabilities		(3.8	)		33.1			16.1			(7.3	)
Accrued taxes payable/receivable		(8.3	)		(1.1	)		(14.2	)		(2.8	)
Deferred employee benefit costs		(23.7	)		(31.4	)		(7.7	)		(7.0	)
Net adjustments		74.2			(168.1	)		56.4			(48.1	)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		130.5			(62.4	)		72.8			(18.5	)
Investing activities:
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired		—			(173.5	)
Capital expenditures		(32.5	)		(29.7	)		(6.9	)		(11.3	)
Proceeds from sale of property, plant, and equipment		8.8			0.7			—			8.5
Proceeds from insurance settlement		1.8			2.0
Net cash used in investing activities		(21.9	)		(200.5	)		(6.9	)		(2.8	)
Financing activities:
Repayment of debt		(12.3	)		(0.1	)		(54.2	)		(11.8	)
Net proceeds (repayments) of short-term borrowings		(107.4	)		209.6
Purchase of subsidiary shares from noncontrolling interest		—			(0.2	)
Credit facility amendment costs		—			(0.6	)
Net increase in book overdrafts		12.6			15.6
Net proceeds of short-term borrowings								168.2			21.4
Net increase (decrease) in book overdrafts								(31.2	)		12.5
Principal payments on finance lease obligations		(9.8	)		(10.5	)		(3.4	)		(3.0	)
Contingent payment related to acquisition		(1.3	)		(0.2	)		—			(0.4	)
Proceeds from sale-leaseback transactions		8.3			4.5
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		(109.9	)		218.1
Net decrease in cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash		(1.3	)		(44.8	)
Net cash provided by financing activities								79.4			18.7
Net increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash								145.3			(2.6	)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash		(0.1	)		(2.0	)		(0.4	)		1.4
Net change in cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash		(1.4	)		(46.8	)		144.9			(1.2	)
Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash—beginning of period		24.3			78.5			59.8			24.3
Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash—end of period	$	22.9		$	31.7		$	204.7		$	23.1
Supplemental disclosures:
Cash paid (received) during the period for:
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest paid to third parties, net	$	51.1		$	50.0		$	6.5		$	6.3
Income taxes, net		(7.2	)		1.5			1.9			3.2
Noncash investing activities:
Asset additions under adoption of accounting principal ASC 842		82.3			—			—			82.3
Asset additions under operating leases		12.5			—			0.4			2.6
Asset additions under finance leases and sale-leasebacks		1.2			9.9			0.1			0.1
Asset additions under financing arrangements		2.2			4.2
Noncash financing activities:
Short term debt converted to finance lease		7.6			—			—			7.6

	September 30,			December 31,			March 31,			December 31,
	2019			2018			2020			2019
	(unaudited)						(unaudited)
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	21.8		$	23.2		$	188.3		$	11.0
Restricted cash		1.1			1.1			16.4			48.8
Receivables less provisions of $4.0 in 2019 and $2.5 in 2018		506.6			521.0
Receivables less provisions of $3.5 in 2020 and 2019								490.7			425.1
Inventories		812.9			806.3			742.8			742.9
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		45.3			61.5			54.2			52.2
Total current assets		1,387.7			1,413.1			1,492.4			1,280.0
Property, plant, and equipment, at cost		853.9			838.4			808.2			806.5
Less: Accumulated depreciation		375.3			349.4			374.5			366.8
Property, plant, and equipment, net		478.6			489.0			433.7			439.7
Operating lease assets		79.5			—			121.5			128.2
Other intangible assets		52.5			58.1			48.7			50.6
Goodwill		120.3			120.3			120.3			120.3
Deferred charges and other assets		3.4			5.8			2.7			2.7
Total assets	$	2,122.0		$	2,086.3		$	2,219.3		$	2,021.5
Liabilities
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	400.4		$	390.2		$	377.5		$	311.5
Salaries, wages, and commissions		44.6			66.6			29.9			35.3
Other accrued liabilities		89.6			77.0			83.7			68.0
Short-term debt		66.9			27.3			31.3			49.2
Current portion of operating lease liabilities		17.7			—			21.2			20.9
Current portion of deferred employee benefits		7.9			7.9			6.9			7.0
Total current liabilities		627.1			569.0			550.5			491.9
Long-term debt		971.7			1,126.0			1,064.8			932.6
Deferred employee benefits		231.9			258.4			206.4			217.5
Noncurrent operating lease liabilities		68.2			—			106.2			112.8
Deferred income taxes		56.0			13.3			79.5			65.2
Other noncurrent liabilities		26.0			43.7			26.5			22.9
Total liabilities		1,980.9			2,010.4			2,033.9			1,842.9
Commitments and contingencies
Equity							��
Ryerson Holding Corporation stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 7,000,000 shares authorized and 0 shares issued at 2019 and 2018		—			—
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized; 37,996,261 and 37,656,505 shares issued at 2019 and 2018, respectively		0.4			0.4
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 7,000,000 shares authorized and 0 shares issued at 2020 and 2019								—			—
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized; 37,996,261 shares issued at 2020 and 2019								0.4			0.4
Capital in excess of par value		380.5			381.0			381.8			381.2
Retained earnings		73.2			14.2			116.0			99.6
Treasury stock at cost – Common stock of 212,500 shares in 2019 and 2018		(6.6	)		(6.6	)
Treasury stock at cost – Common stock of 212,500 shares in 2020 and 2019								(6.6	)		(6.6	)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(312.3	)		(315.8	)		(312.2	)		(302.0	)
Total Ryerson Holding Corporation stockholders’ equity		135.2			73.2			179.4			172.6
Noncontrolling interest		5.9			2.7			6.0			6.0
Total equity		141.1			75.9			185.4			178.6
Total liabilities and equity	$	2,122.0		$	2,086.3		$	2,219.3		$	2,021.5

Ryerson Holding Corporation (“Ryerson Holding”), a Delaware corporation, is the parent company of Joseph T. Ryerson & Son, Inc. (“JT Ryerson”), a Delaware corporation. Affiliates of Platinum Equity, LLC (“Platinum”) own approximately 21,037,500 shares of our common stock, which is approximately 56% of our issued and outstanding common stock.

We are a leading value-added processor and distributor of industrial metals with operations in the United States through JT Ryerson, in Canada through our indirect wholly-owned subsidiary Ryerson Canada, Inc., a Canadian corporation (“Ryerson Canada”), and in Mexico through our indirect wholly-owned subsidiary Ryerson Metals de Mexico, S. de R.L. de C.V., a Mexican corporation (“Ryerson Mexico”). In addition to our North American operations, we conduct materials processing and distribution operations in China through an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary, Ryerson China Limited (“Ryerson China”). Unless the context indicates otherwise, Ryerson Holding, JT Ryerson, Ryerson Canada, Ryerson China, and Ryerson Mexico together with their subsidiaries, are collectively referred to herein as “Ryerson,” “we,” “us,” “our,” or the “Company.”

Results of operations for any interim period are not necessarily indicative of results of any ~~other~~future periods or for the year. The condensed consolidated financial statements as of ~~September 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 and for the ~~three-month~~three months ended March 31, 2020 and ~~nine-month periods ended September 30,~~ 2019 ~~and 2018~~ are unaudited, but in the opinion of management, include all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of results for such periods. The year-end condensed consolidated balance sheet data contained in this report was derived from audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2018.~~2019.

The Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements presented herein reflect estimates and assumptions made by management at March 31, 2020 and for the three-months ended March 31, 2020.

The novel coronavirus (“COVID-19”) continues to spread throughout the United States and other countries across the world, and the duration and severity of the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic are currently unknown. It is possible that the COVID-19 pandemic could impact future accounting estimates and assumptions which could materially impact our results in future periods. Such estimates and assumptions affect, among other things, the Company’s goodwill, long-lived assets, inventory valuation, assessment of the annual effective tax rate, valuation of deferred income taxes and income tax contingencies, and the allowance for doubtful accounts.

In ~~February~~June 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) ~~2016-02, “Leases” codified in Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 842, “Leases” (“ASC 842”). The guidance in ASU 2016-~~02 and subsequently issued amendments requires lessees to recognize assets and liabilities on the balance sheet for the rights and obligations created by all leases with terms of more than twelve months. The amendment also requires disclosures designed to give financial statement users information on the amount, timing, and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases. These disclosures include qualitative and quantitative information.

We adopted the standard effective January 1, 2019 using the alternative modified retrospective transition method, which allows for application of the guidance at the beginning of the period in which it is adopted, rather than at the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented.

~~Adoption of the new standard resulted in the recording of operating lease assets and liabilities of $82.3~~ ~~million~~ and $87.6 million within our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet, respectively, as of January 1, 2019. As part of the adoption, we recorded an adjustment to retained earnings of $3.0 million related to the reassessment of a failed sale-leaseback under ASC 842. The standard had no impact on our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income or our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. See Note 5: Leases for further details.

~~In February 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-02, “Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income.~~” The guidance allows a reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings for stranded tax effects resulting from the U.S. Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (“U.S. Tax Act”). It also requires certain disclosures about stranded tax effects. However, the underlying guidance that requires that the effect of a change in tax laws or rates be included in income from continuing operations is not affected. The guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018 and should be applied either in the period of adoption or retrospectively to each period (or periods) in which the effect of the change in the U.S. federal corporate income tax rate in the U.S. Tax Act is recognized. Adoption of this standard had no impact on our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. We have elected not to reclassify stranded tax effects from accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings related to the U.S. Tax Act as the balances are not material to our consolidated financial statements.

~~In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-13, “Disclosure Framework – Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement.~~”The guidance amends the fair value measurement disclosures by modifying the disclosure requirements in Topic 820, Fair Value Measurement. The update is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019. The guidance allows for early adoption to remove or modify disclosures upon issuance of this amendment, and for delayed adoption

~~of the additional disclosures until their effective date. We adopted this amendment effective September 30, 2019. There was no impact to our consolidated financial statements or disclosures.~~

~~In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-14, “Disclosure Framework – Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Defined Benefit Plans.~~”The amendment removes certain employee benefit plan disclosures that no longer are considered cost-beneficial, clarifies the specific requirements of certain disclosures, and adds certain disclosure requirements identified as relevant. The update is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2020 and should be applied on a retrospective basis to all periods presented. We adopted this amendment effective September 30, 2019. There was no impact to our consolidated financial statements or quarterly disclosures. Our annual disclosures will be updated in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2019.

~~In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU~~ 2016-13, “Financial Instruments – Credit Losses: Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments.” The standard and subsequently issued amendments require financial assets measured at amortized cost basis to be presented at the net amount expected to be collected, thus eliminating the probable initial recognition threshold and instead reflecting the current estimate of all expected credit losses. The amendment also requires that credit losses relating to available-for-sale debt securities be recorded through an allowance for credit losses rather than a write-down, thus enabling the ability to record reversals of credit losses in current period net income. The update is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019. An entity will apply the amendment through a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the first reporting period in which the guidance is effective (that is, a modified-retrospective approach). A prospective transition approach is required for debt securities for which an-other-than-temporary impairment had been recognized before the effective date. The effect of the prospective transition approach is to maintain the same amortized cost basis before and after the effective date of this update. ~~Early adoption is permitted~~ ~~only for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years~~. We ~~will adopt~~adopted this guidance ~~for our fiscal year beginning~~as of January 1, ~~2020. We are still assessing~~2020 and the ~~impact of adoption on our consolidated financial statements but do not expect any material~~ impact to our consolidated financial ~~statements.~~statements was immaterial. See Note 13: Provision for Credit Losses for further details.

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-15, “Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That Is a Service Contract.”The guidance aligns the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred in a hosting arrangement that is a service contract with the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred to develop or obtain internal-use software (and hosting arrangements that include an internal-use software license). Accordingly, the guidance requires an entity (customer) in a hosting arrangement that is a service contract to follow the guidance in Subtopic 350-40 to determine which implementation costs to capitalize as an asset related to the service contract and which costs to expense. The guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019 and should be appliedeither retrospectively or prospectively to all implementation costs incurred after the date of adoption. We adopted this guidance on a prospective basis as of January 1, 2020 and the impact to our consolidated financial statements was immaterial. As of adoption,

license fees and implementation costs that are capitalized for hosting arrangements that are service contracts are classified as prepaid assets on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet and the amortization of these costs are presented in warehousing, delivery, selling, general, and administrative expense on the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income.

In March 2020, the FASB issued ASU 2020-04, “Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848).”The amendments in this update provide optional expedients and exceptions for applying Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) to contracts, hedging relationships, and other transactions affected by reference rate reform if certain criteria are met. The amendments apply only to contracts, hedging relationships, and other transactions that reference LIBOR or another reference rate expected to be discontinued because of reference rate reform. The expedients and exceptions provided by the amendments do not apply to contract modifications made and hedging relationships entered into or evaluated after December 31, 2022, except for hedging relationships existing as of December 31, 2022, that an entity has elected certain optional expedients for and that are retained through the end of the hedging relationship. The amendments in this update are effective for all entities as of March 12, 2020 through December 31, 2022. We adopted this guidance as of March 12, 2020 and there was no impact to our financial statements as no in-scope contract modifications occurred.

In December 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-12, “Income Taxes – Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes.” The guidance removes certain exceptions for recognizing deferred taxes for equity method investments, performing intraperiod allocation, and calculating income taxes in interim periods. The ASU also adds guidance to reduce complexity in certain areas, including recognizing deferred taxes for goodwill and allocating taxes to members of a consolidated group, among others. The amendments in ASU 2019-12 are effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020, including interim periods therein. Early adoption of the standard is ~~permitted.~~permitted, including adoption in interim or annual periods for which financial statements have not yet been issued. We are still assessing the impact of adoption on our consolidated financial statements.

The following table provides a reconciliation of cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash reported within the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets that sum to the total of the beginning and ending cash balances shown in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows:

As part of the indenture for our $650 million senior secured notes due in 2022 (the “2022 Notes”), proceeds from the sale of property, plant, and equipment that is collateral are deposited into a restricted cash account. Cash can be withdrawn from this restricted account upon meeting certain requirements, to fund activities such as debt repayment and future capital expenditures. In December 2019, we signed and closed a sale-leaseback transaction for a group of service center properties, resulting in net proceeds of $61.5 million of which $47.6 million was deposited into the restricted cash account. The balance in the restricted account for property, plant, and equipment sales was $15.2 million at March 31, 2020 compared to $47.6 million at December 31, 2019 as funds were released during the first quarter to repurchase a portion of our 2022 Notes (see Note 7) as well as fund capital expenditures. We also have $1.2 million of cash restricted for the purposes of covering letters of credit that can be presented for potential insurance ~~claims.~~claims at March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019.

The Company primarily uses the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method of valuing inventory. Interim LIFO calculations are based on actual inventory levels.

Inventories, at stated LIFO value, were classified at ~~September 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 and December 31, ~~2018~~2019 as follows:

If current cost had been used to value inventories, such inventories would have been ~~$44~~$71 million ~~lower~~and ~~$18~~$51 million ~~higher~~lower than reported at ~~September 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 and December 31, ~~2018,~~2019, respectively. Approximately 92% and 91% of inventories are accounted for under the LIFO method at ~~September 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 and December 31, ~~2018,~~2019, respectively. Non-LIFO inventories consist primarily of inventory at our foreign facilities using the moving average cost and the specific cost methods. Substantially all of our inventories consist of finished products.

The Company has consignment inventory at certain customer locations, which totaled ~~$6.8~~$5.7 million and ~~$9.3~~$5.6 million at ~~September 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 and December 31, ~~2018,~~2019, respectively.

The Company leases various assets including real estate, trucks, trailers, mobile equipment, processing equipment, and IT equipment. The Company has noncancelable operating leases expiring at various times through ~~2029,~~2032, and finance leases expiring at various times through 2025.

The Company has made an accounting policy election not to record leases with an initial term of twelve months or less (“short term leases”) on the balance sheet as allowed within ASC 842. Short term lease expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term. The Company has elected to apply the practical expedient that allows for the combination of lease and non-lease components for all asset classes. In addition, the Company elected the package of practical expedients permitted under the transition guidance within the new standard, which among other things, allowed the Company to carry forward the historical lease classification for leases that existed at the transition date.

Many of our real estate leases include one or more options to renew, with renewal terms that can extend the lease term from one to 5 years or more. To determine the expected lease term, we include any noncancelable periods within the lease agreement as well as any periods covered by an option to extend the lease if we are reasonably certain to exercise the option. The equipment leases do not typically include options for renewal but do include options for purchase at the end of the lease. We determine the likelihood of exercising the option for purchase by assessing the option price versus the estimated fair value at the end of the lease term to determine if the option price is low enough that we are reasonably certain to exercise it. The depreciable life of finance lease assets and leasehold improvements are limited by the expected lease term, unless there is a transfer of title or purchase option reasonably certain of exercise.

Lease payments include fixed payments, the exercise price of a purchase option that is reasonably certain of exercise, variable payments based on a known index, and the amount probable that the Company will owe under a residual value guarantee. Variable lease payments that are not based on a known index are not included in lease payments and rather are expensed as incurred.

The discount rate used to determine the amount of right of use assets, lease liabilities, and lease classification is the interest rate implicit in the lease, when known. If the rate implicit in the lease is not known, the Company will use its incremental borrowing rate defined as the interest rate swap rate that approximates the lease term plus the long-term expected spread on the $1.0 billion revolving credit facility amended as of September 23, 2019 (the “Ryerson Credit Facility”).

~~We sublease certain real estate to third parties for facilities that we have closed.~~

The following table summarizes the location and amount of lease assets and lease liabilities reported in our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019:

The following table summarizes the location and amount of lease expense reported in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the three ~~and nine month periods~~months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2020 and 2019:

The following table presents maturity analysis of lease liabilities at ~~September 30, 2019:~~March 31, 2020:

The following table shows the weighted-average remaining lease term and discount rate for operating and finance leases, respectively, at ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019:

Information reported in our Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2020 and 2019 is summarized below:

Goodwill, which represents the excess of cost over the fair value of net assets acquired, amounted to $120.3 million at ~~September 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 and December 31, ~~2018. NaN additional goodwill was recognized during the first nine months of~~ 2019. Pursuant to ASC 350, “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other,” we review the recoverability of goodwill annually as of October 1 or whenever significant events or changes occur which might impair the recovery of recorded amounts. The most recently completed quantitative impairment test of goodwill was performed as of October 1, ~~2018~~2019, and it was determined that 0 impairment existed.

Other intangible assets with finite useful lives continue to be amortized over their useful lives. We review the recoverability of our long-lived assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable.

~~On July 2, 2018 (“~~Due to the ~~acquisition date”) JT Ryerson purchased Central Steel & Wire Company (“CS&W”). CS&W is a leading metal service center withlocations across~~COVID-19 pandemic and its effect on our business and the ~~Central and Eastern United States offering a wide selection~~overall economy, we considered the potential impact on our goodwill asset as of ~~products and capabilities, with a commercial portfolio centered on bar, tube, plate, and steel products.~~March 31, 2020. We ~~believe~~determined that it was not more likely than not that the acquisition of CS&W will expand our long, tube, and plate portfolio. Our combined commercial, operational, and processing strengths will provide a broader and deeper array of products to our customers in the Midwest and Northeast United States. The fair value of our reporting unit is below the carrying value based on our evaluation, which took into consideration ~~totaled $163.5 million on~~our stock price during the ~~acquisition date.~~

~~The following table summarizes~~first quarter, both prior to the ~~estimated fair values~~outbreak of the pandemic and after, and projected forecasted income. Our analysis of projected forecasted income considered a short-term temporary impact from the COVID-19 pandemic on volumes and prices, since our last quantitative analysis.

Our Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates for goodwill and intangibles assets ~~acquired~~are disclosed in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements and ~~liabilities assumed at~~in Management's Discussion and Analysis of our annual report on Form 10-K for the ~~acquisition date.~~

~~The Company used third-party valuation firms~~fiscal year ended December 31, 2019. We continue to ~~estimate~~monitor the ~~fair values of property, plant, and equipment and intangible assets~~significant global economic uncertainty as ~~well as to remeasure the deferred employee benefits liabilities. Inventory was valued by the Company using acquisition date fair values of the metals.~~

~~The fair value of accounts receivables acquired was $80.0 million, with~~ a ~~gross amount of $81.8 million. The Company expects $1.8 million to be uncollectible.~~

~~The $16.1 million of acquired intangible assets is related to a trademark acquired with a useful life of 10 years.~~

The transaction resulted in a bargain purchase gain primarily due to higher inventory and property, plant, and equipment fair values compared to book values. The Company believes that the bargain purchase gain was primarily the result of the ~~decision by majority stockholders of CS&W~~COVID-19 pandemic to ~~sell their interests as CS&W had been experiencing increasing net losses. The agreed upon purchase price reflected~~assess the ~~fact the seller would have needed to incur significant costs on future integration initiatives~~outlook for demand for our products and to upgrade their infrastructure and computer systems in order to restore CS&W to a profitable basis. With our existing nationwide service center operations, we believe that our infrastructure will allow the necessary operational improvements to be implemented more efficiently than the seller. The gain of $70.0 million, of which $73.2 million was recorded in the third quarter of 2018, was included in Other income and (expense), net in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income in the second half of 2018. The Company recognized $1.6 million in acquisition-related fees, which was included in Warehousing, delivery, selling, general, and administrative expense in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income in the second half of 2018.

Included in the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2019 financial results is revenue of $134.3 million and $460.8 million, and a net loss of $0.8 million and net income of $1.4 million, respectively,from CS&W. Included in the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2018 financial results is revenue of $178.2 million and net income of $56.6 million (includes the $73.2 million bargain purchase gain).

The following unaudited pro forma information presents consolidated results of operations for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2019 and 2018 as if the acquisition of CS&W on July 2, 2018 had occurred on January 1, 2018:

~~On April 2, 2018, Ryerson Holding acquired Fanello Industries, LLC (“Fanello”), a privately owned metal service company located in Lavonia, Georgia.~~ ~~The acquisition is not material to our consolidated financial statements.~~

~~Pro forma information related to the acquisition of Fanello is not provided above as~~ the impact on our business and our overall financial performance. A lack of recovery or further deterioration in market conditions, a trend of weaker than expected financial performance in our business, or a lack of recovery or further decline in the ~~Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income is not material.~~Company’s market capitalization, among other factors, could result in an impairment charge in future periods which could have a material adverse effect on our financial statements.

Long-term debt consisted of the following at ~~September 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 and December 31, ~~2018:~~2019:

In March 2020, the Company borrowed approximately $166 million under its $1 billion credit facility (the “Ryerson Credit Facility”) as a proactive, precautionary measure to increase its cash position and preserve financial flexibility in light of current uncertainty in the global markets resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic.

OnOn November 16, 2016, Ryerson entered into an amendment with respect to its $1.0 billion revolving credit facility (as amended, the “Old Credit Facility”), to reduce the total facility size from $1.0 billion to $750 million, reduce the interest rate on outstanding borrowings by 25 basis points, reduce commitment fees on amounts not borrowed by 2.5 basis points, and to extend the maturity date to November 16, 2021. The Old Credit Facility was amended a second time on June 28, 2018, to increase the facility size from $750 million to $1.0 billion. On September 23, 2019, a third amendment was entered into to supplement the facility and add a U.S. “first-in, last-out” ~~subfacility~~sub-facility of $67.9 million (the “FILO Facility”). The FILO facility is equal in subordination with the other borrowings under the Ryerson Credit Facility and has a maturity date of ~~the FILO Facility is~~ June 30, 2020. The FILO facility supplements our borrowing capacity by providing additional collateral on eligible accounts receivable and inventory. The aggregate facility size of $1.0 billion remains unchanged.

At ~~September 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020, Ryerson had ~~$440.6~~$546.3 million of outstanding borrowings, ~~$12~~including $16.9 million under the FILO Facility, $11 million of letters of credit issued, and ~~$395~~$159 million available under the Ryerson Credit Facility compared to ~~$535.9~~$377.7 million of outstanding borrowings, ~~$12~~including $34.3 million under the FILO Facility, $11 million of letters of credit issued, and ~~$392~~$348 million available at December 31, ~~2018.~~2019. Total credit availability is limited by the amount of eligible accounts receivable, inventory, and qualified cash pledged as collateral under the agreement insofar as Ryerson is subject to a borrowing base comprised of the aggregate of these three amounts, less applicable reserves. Eligible accounts receivable, at any date of determination, is comprised of the aggregate value of all accounts directly created by a borrower (and in the case of Canadian accounts, the Canadian borrower) in the ordinary course of business arising out of the sale of goods or the rendering of services, each of which has been invoiced, with such receivables adjusted to exclude various ineligible accounts, including, among other things, those to which a borrower (or guarantor, as applicable) does not have sole and absolute title and accounts arising out of a sale to an employee, officer, director, or affiliate of a borrower (or guarantor, as applicable). Eligible inventory, at any date of determination, is comprised of the net orderly liquidation value of all inventory owned by a borrower (and in the case of Canadian accounts, the Canadian borrower). Qualified cash consists of cash in an eligible deposit account that is subject to customary restrictions and liens in favor of the lenders.

The Ryerson Credit Facility has an allocation of $940 million to the Company’s subsidiaries in the United States and an allocation of $60 million to Ryerson Holding’s Canadian subsidiary that is a borrower. Amounts outstanding under the Ryerson Credit Facility bear interest at (i) a rate determined by reference to (A) the base rate (the highest of the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.50%, Bank of America, N.A.’s prime rate, and the one-month LIBOR rate plus 1.00%) or (B) a LIBOR rate or, (ii) for Ryerson Holding’s Canadian subsidiary that is a borrower, (A) a rate determined by reference to the Canadian base rate (the greatest of the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.50%, Bank of America-Canada Branch’s “base rate” for commercial loans in U.S. Dollars made at its “base rate”, and the 30 day LIBOR rate plus 1.00%), (B) the prime rate (the greater of Bank of America-Canada Branch’s “prime rate” for commercial loans made by it in Canada in Canadian Dollars and the one-month Canadian bankers’ acceptance rate plus 1.00%), or (C) the bankers’ acceptance rate. The spread over the base rate and prime rate is between 0.25% and 0.50% and the spread over the LIBOR for the bankers’ acceptances is between 1.25% and 1.50%, depending on the amount available to be borrowed under the Ryerson Credit Facility. Amounts outstanding under the FILO Facility bear interest at the same rates as listed above for U.S. borrowings, however the spread over the base rate is between 1.25% and 1.50% and the spread over the LIBOR rate is between 2.25% and 2.50%, depending on the amount available to be borrowed under the Ryerson Credit Facility. Ryerson also pays commitment fees on amounts

not borrowed at a rate of 0.23%. Overdue amounts and all amounts owed during the existence of a default bear interest at 2% above the rate otherwise applicable thereto. Loans advanced under the FILO Facility may only be prepaid if all then outstanding revolving loans are repaid in full.

We attempt to minimize interest rate risk exposure through the utilization of interest rate swaps, which are derivative financial instruments. In March 2017, we entered into an interest rate swap to fix interest on $150 million of our floating rate debt under the Ryerson Credit Facility at a rate of 1.658% ~~through~~. This hedge expired in March 2020. In June 2019, we entered into a second interest rate swap to fix interest on $60 million of our floating rate debt under the Ryerson Credit Facility at a rate of 1.729% through June 2022. ~~Both~~In November 2019, we entered into a third interest rate swap to fix interest on $100 million of our floating rate debt under the Ryerson Credit Facility at a rate of 1.539% through November 2022. All of the swaps have reset dates and critical terms that match our existing debt and the anticipated critical terms of future debt. The weighted average interest rate on the outstanding borrowings under the Ryerson Credit Facility including the interest rate ~~swap~~swaps was ~~3.3%~~2.4% and ~~3.5~~3.2% at ~~September 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 and December 31, ~~2018,~~2019, respectively.

Borrowings under the Ryerson Credit Facility are secured by first-priority liens on all of the inventory, accounts receivables, lockbox accounts, and related assets of the borrowers and the guarantors.

The Ryerson Credit Facility also contains covenants that, among other things, restrict Ryerson Holding and its restricted subsidiaries with respect to the incurrence of debt, the creation of liens, transactions with affiliates, mergers and consolidations, sales of assets, and acquisitions. The Ryerson Credit Facility also requires that, if availability under the Ryerson Credit Facility declines to a certain level, Ryerson maintain a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio as of the end of each fiscal quarter, and includes defaults upon (among other things) the occurrence of a change of control of Ryerson and a cross-default to other financing arrangements.

The Ryerson Credit Facility contains events of default with respect to, among other things, default in the payment of principal when due or the payment of interest, fees, and other amounts due thereunder after a specified grace period, material misrepresentations, failure to perform certain specified covenants, certain bankruptcy events, the invalidity of certain security agreements or guarantees, material judgments, and the occurrence of a change of control of Ryerson. If such an event of default occurs, the lenders under the Ryerson Credit Facility will be entitled to various remedies, including acceleration of amounts outstanding under the Ryerson Credit Facility and all other actions permitted to be taken by secured creditors.

The lenders under the Ryerson Credit Facility could reject a borrowing request if any event, circumstance, or development has occurred that has had or could reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on the Company. If Ryerson Holding, JT Ryerson, any of the other borrowers, or any restricted subsidiaries of JT Ryerson becomes insolvent or commences bankruptcy proceedings, all amounts borrowed under the Ryerson Credit Facility will become immediately due and payable.

Net proceeds of short-term borrowings that are reflected in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows represent borrowings under the Ryerson Credit Facility with original maturities less than three months.

On May 24, 2016, JT Ryerson issued ~~$650 million in aggregate principal amount of~~ the 2022 Notes ~~(the “2022 Notes”). The 2022 Notes~~that bear interest at a rate of 11.00% per annum. The 2022 Notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a senior secured basis by all of our existing and future domestic subsidiaries that are co-borrowers or that have guarantee obligations under the Ryerson Credit Facility.

During 2018, a principal amount of $50.5 million of the 2022 Notes were repurchased for $52.2 million and retired. During the first nine months of 2019, a principal amount of $11.6 million of the 2022 Notes were repurchased for $11.8 million and retired, resulting in the recognition of a $0.2 million loss within other income and (expense), net on the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income.

The 2022 Notes and the related guarantees are secured by a first-priority security interest in substantially all of JT Ryerson’s and each guarantor’s present and future assets located in the United States (other than receivables, inventory, cash, deposit accounts and related general intangibles, certain other assets, and proceeds thereof), subject to certain exceptions and customary permitted liens. The 2022 Notes and the related guarantees are also secured on a second-priority basis by a lien on the assets that secure JT Ryerson’s and the Company’s obligations under the Ryerson Credit Facility.

The 2022 Notes are redeemable at the following redemption prices: if redeemed prior to May 15, 2020, 105.50%, and if redeemed during the twelve months beginning May 15, 2020, 102.75%, and May 15, 2021 and thereafter, 100.00%. JT Ryerson may be required to make an offer to purchase the 2022 Notes upon the sale of assets or upon a change of control.

The 2022 Notes contain customary covenants that, among other things, limit, subject to certain exceptions, our ability, and the ability of our restricted subsidiaries, to incur additional indebtedness, pay dividends on our capital stock or repurchase our capital stock, make investments, sell assets, engage in acquisitions, mergers, or consolidations, or create liens or use assets as security in other transactions. Subject to certain exceptions, JT Ryerson may only pay dividends to Ryerson Holding to the extent of 50% of cumulative net income since the issuance of the 2022 Notes, once prior losses are offset.

During the first three months of 2019, a principal amount of $11.6 million of the 2022 Notes were repurchased for $11.8 million and retired, resulting in the recognition of a $0.2 million loss within other income and (expense), net on the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income.

During the first three months of 2020, a principal amount of $54.6 million of the 2022 Notes were repurchased for $53.8 million and retired, resulting in the recognition of a $0.8 million gain within other income and (expense), net on the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income.

At ~~September 30, 2019,~~March 31, 2020, Ryerson China’s foreign borrowings were ~~$7.5~~$12.7 million, which were owed to banks in Asia at a weighted average interest rate of ~~4.1%~~4.2% per annum and secured by inventory and property, plant, and equipment. At December 31, ~~2018,~~2019, Ryerson China’s foreign borrowings were ~~$19.5~~$13.2 million, which were owed to banks in Asia at a weighted average interest rate of 4.3% per annum and secured by inventory and property, plant, and equipment.

Availability under the foreign credit lines was ~~$38~~$34 million and ~~$26~~$32 million at ~~September 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 and December 31, ~~2018,~~2019, respectively. Letters of credit issued by our foreign subsidiaries were $4 million at ~~September 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 and $3 million at December 31, ~~2018,~~2019, respectively.

The following ~~tables summarize~~table summarizes the components of net periodic benefit cost (credit) for the three months ended March 31, 2020 and ~~nine month periods ended September 30,~~ 2019 ~~and 2018~~ for the Ryerson pension plans and postretirement benefit plans other than pension:

Components of net periodic benefit cost (credit), excluding service cost, are included in Other income and (expense), net in our Condensed Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income.

The Company ~~has~~ contributed ~~$21~~$7 million to the pension plan ~~fund~~funds through the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2019 and anticipates that it will have a minimum required pension contribution funding of approximately $5 million for~~March 31, 2020. The Company has elected to defer the remaining ~~three months~~expected 2020 U.S. contributions of ~~2019.~~$13 million until December 31, 2020, as permitted under The Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (“The CARES Act”) that was passed in March 2020.

In October 2011, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (the “EPA”) named usJT Ryerson as one of more than 100 businesses that may be a potentially responsible party (“PRP”) for the Portland Harbor Superfund Site (the “PHS Site”). On January 6, 2017, the EPA issued an initial Record of Decision (“ROD”) regarding the site. The ROD includes a combination of dredging, capping, and enhanced natural recovery that would take approximately thirteen years to construct plus additional time for monitored natural recovery, at an estimated present value cost of $1.05 billion. In a change tofrom its prior stance, at a meeting on December 4, 2018, the EPA ~~announced~~indicated that it ~~expects potentially responsible parties~~expected PRPs to submit a plan during 2019 to start remediation of the river and harbor per the original ROD within the next two to three years. ItThe EPA also ~~expects~~indicated that it expected allocation of amounts among the parties to be

determined in the same two to three-yeartime frame. The EPA invited certain PRPs to a May 2, 2019 meeting to discuss starting the remedial design process. The EPA did not include JT Ryerson in those meetings.

On December 9, 2019, a PRP group met with Administrator Wheeler, the head of the EPA, to discuss updating the ROD as recent testing indicates that the levels of contamination have “drastically improved” and, thus, remediation should be much less drastic than that in the current ROD. Administrator Wheeler directed regional EPA staff to again review the ROD before moving forward with any enforcement action. On March 3, 2020, the regional EPA issued a letter to the PRP group, essentially rejecting the request but noting that new data would be used for fine-tuning the implementation of the remedy and to that extent could result in less active remediation.

The EPA indicated in a January 2, 2020 “progress update” letter that it is negotiating with certain parties to perform remedial design work at 5 unspecified areas which comprise 52% of the overall acreage subject to remediation. In late March, the EPA issued a Unilateral Administrative Order for Remedial Design to Schnitzer Steel, ordering it to develop a remedial design plan for the river area which includes the area where our former facilities were. In the meantime, Schnitzer has filed a petition for relief from the remedy required by the ROD.

considerations until after the ~~Remedial Design~~remedial design work is completed. It has met with selected parties that we believe to be larger ~~targets;~~targets. JT Ryerson has not been ~~included in that group.~~invited to meet with the EPA. As a result of the ongoing negotiations and filings over the ROD and the EPA’s decision not to meet with smaller parties, we cannot determine how allocations will be made and whether a de minimus settlement can be reached with the EPA.

The EPA has not yet allocated responsibility for the contamination among the potentially responsible parties, including JT Ryerson. We do not currently have sufficient information available to us to determine whether the ROD will be executed as currently stated, whether and to what extent JT Ryerson may be held responsible for any of the identified contamination, and how much (if any) of the final plan’s costs might ultimately be allocated to JT Ryerson. Therefore, management cannot predict the ultimate outcome of this matter or estimate a range of potential loss at this time.

There are various other claims and pending actions against the Company. The amount of liability, if any, for those claims and actions at ~~September 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 is not determinable but, in the opinion of management, such liability, if any, will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. We maintain liability insurance coverage to assist in protecting our assets from losses arising from or related to activities associated with business operations.

The Company may use derivatives to partially offset its business exposure to commodity price, foreign currency, and interest rate ~~risks~~fluctuations and their related impact on expected future cash flows and certain existing assets and liabilities. However, the Company may choose not to hedge certain exposures for a variety of reasons including, but not limited to, Company policy, accounting considerations, or the prohibitive economic cost of hedging particular exposures. There can be no assurance the hedges will offset more than a portion of the financial impact resulting from movements in commodity pricing, foreign currency exchange, or interest rates. ~~Specifically, interest~~Interest rate swaps are entered into to manage interest rate risk associated with the Company’s floating-rate borrowings. We use foreign currency exchange contracts to hedge variability in cash flows in our Canada, Mexico, and China operations when a payment currency is different from our functional currency. From time to time, we may enter into fixed price sales contracts with our customers for certain of our inventory components. We may enter into metal commodity futures and options contracts to reduce volatility in the price of these metals. We may also enter into fixed price natural gas contracts and diesel fuel ~~price swaps~~derivative contracts to manage the price risk of forecasted purchases of natural gas and diesel fuel.

We have 2 receive variable, pay fixed, interest rate swaps to manage the exposure to variable interest rates of the Ryerson Credit Facility. In ~~March 2017, we entered into a forward agreement for $150 million of “pay fixed” interest at 1.658%, and in~~ June 2019, we entered into a forward agreement for $60 million of “pay fixed” interest at 1.729% and in November 2019, we entered into a forward agreement for $100 million of “pay fixed” interest at 1.539%. The interest rate reset dates and critical terms match the terms of our existing debt and anticipated critical terms of future debt under the Ryerson Credit Facility. The fair value of the interest rate swaps as of ~~September 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 was a net liability of ~~$0.4~~$4.9 million.

The Company currently does not account for its commodity and foreign exchange derivative contracts as hedges but rather marks them to market with a corresponding offset to current earnings. The Company accounts for its interest rate swaps as cash flow hedges of floating-rate borrowings with changes in fair value being recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income. The Company has made an accounting policy election to offset the fair value of derivative liabilities with related cash collateral. As of ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2020, and December 31, 2019, the Company offset ~~$4.3~~$0.5 millionand $2.7 million, respectively, of fair value liabilities with cash held as collateral by the counterparty.

The Company regularly reviews the creditworthiness of its derivative counterparties and does not expect to incur a significant loss from the failure of any counterparties to perform under any agreements.

The following table summarizes the location and fair value amount of our derivative instruments reported in our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of ~~September 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 and December 31, ~~2018:~~2019:

	Asset Derivatives					Liability Derivatives							Asset Derivatives					Liability Derivatives
	Balance Sheet Location	September 30, 2019		December 31, 2018		Balance Sheet Location	September 30, 2019			December 31, 2018			Balance Sheet Location	March 31, 2020		December 31, 2019		Balance Sheet Location		March 31, 2020			December 31, 2019
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments under ASC 815	(In millions)												(In millions)
Metal commodity contracts	Prepaid expenses and other current assets	$	2.3	$	1.6	Other accrued liabilities	$	14.6	(a)	$	5.4		Prepaid expenses and other current assets	$	1.0	$	5.0	Other accrued liabilities	(a)	$	8.2	(b)	$	9.4
Crude oil contracts	Prepaid expenses and other current assets		0.5		—	Other accrued liabilities		—			—		Prepaid expenses and other current assets		—		0.1	Other accrued liabilities			—			—
Foreign exchange contracts	Prepaid expenses and other current assets		—		0.2	Other accrued liabilities		—			—		Prepaid expenses and other current assets		0.2		—	Other accrued liabilities			—			—
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments under ASC 815
Interest rate swaps	Deferred charges and other assets		0.1		1.5	Other noncurrent liabilities		0.5			—		Deferred charges and other assets		—		—	Other noncurrent liabilities			4.9			0.2
Total derivatives		$	2.9	$	3.3		$	15.1	(a)	$	5.4			$	1.2	$	5.1		(a)	$	13.1	(b)	$	9.6
(a) The offsetting cash collateral balance of $4.3 million held by the derivative counterparty brings the net metal commodity contract liability to $10.3 million and the net total derivative liability balance to $10.8 million.
(a) The offsetting cash collateral balance of $0.5 million held by the derivative counterparty brings the net metal commodity contract liability to $7.7 million and the net total derivative liability balance to $12.6 million as of March 31, 2020.												(a) The offsetting cash collateral balance of $0.5 million held by the derivative counterparty brings the net metal commodity contract liability to $7.7 million and the net total derivative liability balance to $12.6 million as of March 31, 2020.
(b) The offsetting cash collateral balance of $2.7 million held by the derivative counterparty brought the net metal commodity contract liability to $6.7 million and the net total derivative liability balance to $6.9 million as of December 31, 2019.												(b) The offsetting cash collateral balance of $2.7 million held by the derivative counterparty brought the net metal commodity contract liability to $6.7 million and the net total derivative liability balance to $6.9 million as of December 31, 2019.

The following table presents the volume of the Company’s activity in derivative instruments as of ~~September 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 and December 31, ~~2018:~~2019:

The following table summarizes the location and amount of gains and losses on derivatives not designated as hedging instruments reported in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 and ~~2018:~~2019:

The following table summarizes the location and amount of gains and losses on derivatives designated as hedging instruments reported in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 and ~~2018:~~2019:

As of ~~September 30, 2019,~~March 31, 2020, the portion of the interest rate swap fair value that would be reclassified into earnings during the next 12 months as interest ~~income~~expense is approximately ~~$0.1~~$1.8 million.

To increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements, ASC 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three levels as follows:

The following table presents assets and liabilities measured and recorded at fair value on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet on a recurring basis and their level within the fair value hierarchy as of ~~September 30, 2019:~~March 31, 2020:

	At September 30, 2019								At March 31, 2020
	Level 1		Level 2			Level 3			Level 1		Level 2			Level 3
	(In millions)								(In millions)
Assets
Derivatives:
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments under ASC 815:
Metal commodity contracts	$	—	$	2.3		$	—		$	—	$	1.0		$	—
Crude oil contracts		—		0.5			—
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments under ASC 815:				—
Interest rate swaps		—		0.1			—
Foreign exchange contracts										—		0.2			—
Total derivatives	$	—	$	2.9		$	—		$	—	$	1.2		$	—
Liabilities
Derivatives:
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments under ASC 815:
Metal commodity contracts	$	—	$	14.6	(a)	$	—		$	—	$	8.2	(a)	$	—
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments under ASC 815:
Interest rate swaps		—		0.5			—			—		4.9			—
Total derivatives	$	—	$	15.1	(a)	$	—		$	—	$	13.1	(a)	$	—
(a) The offsetting cash collateral balance of $4.3 million held by the derivative counterparty brings the net metal commodity contract liability to $10.3 million and the net total derivative liability balance to $10.8 million.
(a) The offsetting cash collateral balance of $0.5 million held by the derivative counterparty brings the net metal commodity contract liability to $7.7 million and the net total derivative liability balance to $12.6 million.								(a) The offsetting cash collateral balance of $0.5 million held by the derivative counterparty brings the net metal commodity contract liability to $7.7 million and the net total derivative liability balance to $12.6 million.

	At December 31, 2018							At December 31, 2019
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3			Level 1		Level 2			Level 3
	(In millions)							(In millions)
Assets
Derivatives:
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments under ASC 815:
Metal commodity contracts	$	—	$	1.6	$	—		$	—	$	5.0		$	—
Foreign exchange contracts		—		0.2		—			—		0.1			—
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments under ASC 815:
Interest rate swaps		—		1.5		—
Total derivatives	$	—	$	3.3	$	—		$	—	$	5.1		$	—
Liabilities
Derivatives:
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments under ASC 815:
Metal commodity contracts	$	—	$	5.4	$	—		$	—	$	9.4	(b)	$	—
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments under ASC 815:
Interest rate swaps									—		0.2			—
Total derivatives								$	—	$	9.6	(b)	$	—
(b) The offsetting cash collateral balance of $2.7 million held by the derivative counterparty brought the net metal commodity contract liability to $6.7 million and the net total derivative liability balance to $6.9 million.							(b) The offsetting cash collateral balance of $2.7 million held by the derivative counterparty brought the net metal commodity contract liability to $6.7 million and the net total derivative liability balance to $6.9 million.

The fair value of each derivative contract is determined using Level 2 inputs and the market approach valuation technique, as described in ASC 820. The Company has various commodity derivatives to lock in nickel prices for varying time periods. The fair value of these derivatives is determined based on the spot price each individual contract was purchased at and compared with the one-month daily average actual spot price on the London Metals Exchange for nickel on the valuation date. The Company also has commodity derivatives to lock in hot roll coil, crude oil, iron ore, and aluminum prices for varying time periods. The fair value of hot roll coil, crude oil, iron ore, and aluminum derivatives is determined based on the spot price each individual contract was purchased at and compared with the one-month daily average actual spot price on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange (hot roll coil and crude oil), the Singapore Exchange, and the London Metals Exchange, respectively, for the commodity on the valuation date. In addition, the Company has numerous foreign exchange contracts to hedge variability in cash flows when a payment currency is different from our functional currency. The Company defines the fair value of foreign exchange contracts as the amount of the difference between the contracted and current market value at the end of the period. The Company estimates the current market value of foreign exchange contracts by obtaining month-end market quotes of foreign exchange rates and forward rates for contracts with similar terms. The Company uses the exchange rates provided by Reuters. Each commodity and foreign exchange contract term varies in ~~the number of months,~~length, but in general, contracts are between 1 to 12 months ~~in length.~~. The fair value of our interest rate swap is based on the sum of all future net present value cash flows for the fixed and floating leg of the swap. The future cash flows are derived based on the terms of our interest rate swap, as well as published discount factors, and projected forward LIBOR rates.

The carrying and estimated fair values of our financial instruments at ~~September 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 and December 31, ~~2018~~2019 were as follows:

The estimated fair value of the Company’s cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, receivables less provisions, and accounts payable approximate their carrying amounts due to the short-term nature of these financial instruments. The estimated fair value of the Company’s long-term debt and the current portions thereof is determined by using quoted market prices of Company debt securities (Level 2 inputs).

The fair values less costs to sell of long-lived assets held for sale are assessed each reporting period that they remain classified as held for sale. Any increase or decrease in the held for sale long-lived asset’s fair value less cost to sell is reported as an adjustment to its carrying amount, except that the adjusted carrying amount cannot exceed the carrying amount of the long-lived asset at the time it was initially classified as held for sale. The fair values of each property were determined based upon appraisals obtained from a third-party, pending sales contracts, or recent listing agreements with third-party brokerage firms (Level 2 inputs).

The following tables present assets and liabilities measured and recorded at the lower of its carry value or fair value less cost to sell on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets on a non-recurring basis and their level within the fair value hierarchy as of March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019:

NOTE ~~12:~~11: STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT), ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS), AND NONCONTROLLING INTEREST

The following table details changes in ~~these~~Ryerson Holding Corporation Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit) accounts for ~~each of~~ the ~~three quarters~~first quarter ended ~~September 30, 2019:~~

Ryerson Holding Corporation Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)

Accumulated Other
Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Common
Stock

Treasury
Stock

Capital in
Excess of
Par Value

Retained Earnings

Foreign
Currency
Translation

Benefit Plan
Liabilities

Cash Flow Hedge- Interest Rate Swap

Non-controlling
Interest

Total
Equity

Shares

Dollars

Shares

Dollars

Dollars

Dollars

Dollars

Dollars

Dollars

Dollars

Dollars

(In millions, except shares in thousands)

Balance at January 1, 2019

37,656

$
0.4

213

$
(6.6
)

$
381.0

$
14.2

$
(52.8
)

$
(264.0
)

$
1.0

$
2.7

$
75.9

Net income

—

—

—

—

—

29.5

—

—

—

0.1

29.6

Foreign currency translation

—

—

—

—

—

—

2.9

—

—

0.1

3.0

Changes in defined benefit pension and other post-retirement benefit plans, net of tax of $0.3

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

0.9

—

—

0.9

Adoption of accounting principal ASC 842, net of tax of $1.1

—

—
��

—

—

—

3.0

—

—

—

—

3.0

Stock-based compensation expense

10

—

—

—

0.8

—

—

—

—

—

0.8

Cash flow hedge - interest rate swap, net of tax of $0.1

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

(0.4
)

—

(0.4
)
Balance at March 31, 2019

37,666

0.4

213

(6.6
)

381.8

46.7

(49.9
)

(263.1
)

0.6

2.9

112.8

Net income

—

—

—

—

—

16.4

—

—

—

0.1

16.5

Foreign currency translation

—

—

—

—

—

—

0.8

—

—

—

0.8

Changes in defined benefit pension and other post-retirement benefit plans, net of tax of $0.3

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

0.8

—

—

0.8

Stock-based compensation expense

330

—

—

—

0.8

—

—

—

—

—

0.8

Purchase of subsidiary shares from noncontrolling interest

—

—

—

—

(2.9
)

—

—

—

—

2.9

—

Cash flow hedge - interest rate swap, net of tax of $0.3

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

(0.6
)

—

(0.6
)
Balance at June 30, 2019

37,996

0.4

213

(6.6
)

379.7

63.1

(49.1
)

(262.3
)

—

5.9

131.1

Net income

—

—

—

—

—

10.1

—

—

—

0.1

10.2

Foreign currency translation

—

—

—

—

—

—

(1.3
)

—

—

(0.1
)

(1.4
)
Changes in defined benefit pension and other post-retirement benefit plans, net of tax of $0.3

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

0.8

—

—

0.8

Stock-based compensation expense

—

—

—

—

0.8

—

—

—

—

—

0.8

Cash flow hedge - interest rate swap, net of tax of $0.2

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

(0.4
)

—

(0.4
)
Balance at September 30, 2019

37,996

$
0.4

213

$
(6.6
)

$
380.5

$
73.2

$
(50.4
)

$
(261.5
)

$
(0.4
)

$
5.9

$
141.1

														Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
	Common Stock				Treasury Stock					Capital in Excess of Par Value		Retained Earnings		Foreign Currency Translation			Benefit Plan Liabilities			Cash Flow Hedge- Interest Rate Swap			Non-controlling Interest		Total Equity
	Shares		Dollars		Shares		Dollars			Dollars		Dollars		Dollars			Dollars			Dollars			Dollars		Dollars
	(In millions, except shares in thousands)
Balance at January 1, 2020		37,996	$	0.4		213	$	(6.6	)	$	381.2	$	99.6	$	(48.6	)	$	(253.1	)	$	(0.3	)	$	6.0	$	178.6
Net income		—		—		—		—			—		16.4		—			—			—			—		16.4
Foreign currency translation		—		—		—		—			—		—		(8.5	)		—			—			—		(8.5	)
Changes in defined benefit pension and other post-retirement benefit plans, net of tax of $0.6		—		—		—		—			—		—		—			1.8			—			—		1.8
Stock-based compensation expense		—		—		—		—			0.6		—		—			—			—			—		0.6
Cash flow hedge - interest rate swap, net of tax of $1.2		—		—		—		—			—		—		—			—			(3.5	)		—		(3.5	)
Balance at March 31, 2020		37,996	$	0.4		213	$	(6.6	)	$	381.8	$	116.0	$	(57.1	)	$	(251.3	)	$	(3.8	)	$	6.0	$	185.4

The following table details changes in ~~these~~Ryerson Holding Corporation Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit) accounts for ~~each of~~ the ~~three quarters~~first quarter ended ~~September 30, 2018:~~March 31, 2019:

Ryerson Holding Corporation Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)

Accumulated Other
Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Common
Stock

Treasury
Stock

Capital in
Excess of
Par Value

Accumulated
Deficit

Foreign
Currency
Translation

Benefit Plan
Liabilities

Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Equity Securities

Cash Flow Hedge- Interest Rate Swap

Non-controlling
Interest

Total
Equity

Shares

Dollars

Shares

Dollars

Dollars

Dollars

Dollars

Dollars

Dollars

Dollars

Dollars

Dollars

(In millions, except shares in thousands)

Balance at January 1, 2018

37,421

$
0.4

213

$
(6.6
)

$
377.6

$
(95.1
)

$
(41.6
)

$
(246.3
)

$
1.0

$
0.6

$
2.6

$
(7.4
)
Net income

—

—

—

—

—

10.4

—

—

—

—

0.2

10.6

Foreign currency translation

—

—

—

—

—

—

(1.4
)

—

—

—

—

(1.4
)
Foreign currency loss on intra-entity transactions

—

—

—

—

—

—

(1.3
)

—

—

—

—

(1.3
)
Changes in defined benefit pension and other post-retirement benefit plans, net of tax of $0.3

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

1.0

—

—

—

1.0

Adoption of accounting principal ASU 2016-01

—

—

—

—

—

1.0

—

—

(1.0
)

—

—

—

Adoption of accounting principal ASC 606, net of tax of $0.7

—

—

—

—

—

2.3

—

—

—

—

—

2.3

Stock-based compensation expense

—

—

—

—

0.7

—

—

—

—

—

—

0.7

Cash flow hedge - interest rate swap, net of tax of $0.2

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

0.7

—

0.7

Balance at March 31, 2018

37,421

0.4

213

(6.6
)

378.3

(81.4
)

(44.3
)

(245.3
)

—

1.3

2.8

5.2

Net income (loss)

—

—

—

—

—

17.5

—

—

—

—

(0.1
)

17.4

Foreign currency translation

—

—

—

—

—

—

(2.4
)

—

—

—

0.1

(2.3
)
Foreign currency loss on intra-entity transactions

—

—

—

—

—

—

(1.0
)

—

—

—

—

(1.0
)
Changes in defined benefit pension and other post-retirement benefit plans, net of tax of $0.4

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

0.9

—

—

—

0.9

Stock-based compensation expense

87

—

—

—

1.0

—

—

—

—

—

—

1.0

Purchase of subsidiary shares from noncontrolling interest

—

—

—

—

0.1

—

—

—

—

—

(0.3
)

(0.2
)
Cash flow hedge - interest rate swap, net of tax of $0.1

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

0.2

—

0.2

Balance at June 30, 2018

37,508

0.4

213

(6.6
)

379.4

(63.9
)

(47.7
)

(244.4
)

—

1.5

2.5

21.2

Net income

—

—

—

—

—

77.5

—

—

—

—

0.2

77.7

Foreign currency translation

—

—

—

—

—

—

0.6

—

—

—

(0.1
)

0.5

Foreign currency gain on intra-entity transactions

—

—

—

—

—

—

0.8

—

—

—

—

0.8

Changes in defined benefit pension and other post-retirement benefit plans, net of tax of $0.3

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

1.0

—

—

—

1.0

Stock-based compensation expense

148

—

—

—

0.9

—

—

—

—

—

—

0.9

Balance at September 30, 2018

37,656

$
0.4

213

$
(6.6
)

$
380.3

$
13.6

$
(46.3
)

$
(243.4
)

$
—

$
1.5

$
2.6

$
102.1

														Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
	Common Stock				Treasury Stock					Capital in Excess of Par Value		Retained Earnings		Foreign Currency Translation			Benefit Plan Liabilities			Cash Flow Hedge- Interest Rate Swap			Non-controlling Interest		Total Equity
	Shares		Dollars		Shares		Dollars			Dollars		Dollars		Dollars			Dollars			Dollars			Dollars		Dollars
	(In millions, except shares in thousands)
Balance at January 1, 2019		37,656	$	0.4		213	$	(6.6	)	$	381.0	$	14.2	$	(52.8	)	$	(264.0	)	$	1.0		$	2.7	$	75.9
Net income		—		—		—		—			—		29.5		—			—			—			0.1		29.6
Foreign currency translation		—		—		—		—			—		—		2.9			—			—			0.1		3.0
Changes in defined benefit pension and other post-retirement benefit plans, net of tax of $0.3		—		—		—		—			—		—		—			0.9			—			—		0.9
Adoption of accounting principal ASC 842, net of tax of $1.1		—		—		—		—			—		3.0		—			—			—			—		3.0
Stock-based compensation expense		10		—		—		—			0.8		—		—			—			—			—		0.8
Cash flow hedge - interest rate swap, net of tax of $0.1		—		—		—		—			—		—		—			—			(0.4	)		—		(0.4	)
Balance at March 31, 2019		37,666	$	0.4		213	$	(6.6	)	$	381.8	$	46.7	$	(49.9	)	$	(263.1	)	$	0.6		$	2.9	$	112.8

The following table details changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2019:~~March 31, 2020:

The following table details the reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) for the three months ended March 31, 2020 and ~~nine month periods ended September 30,~~March 31, 2019:

	Reclassifications Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)								Reclassifications Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
	Amount reclassified from Accumulated								Amount reclassified from Accumulated
	Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)								Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
	Three Months Ended			Nine Months Ended			Affected line item in the Condensed		Three Months Ended						Affected line item in the Consolidated
Details about Accumulated Other	September 30, 2019						Consolidated Statements of		March 31, 2020			March 31, 2019			Statements of
Comprehensive Income (Loss) Components	(In millions)						Comprehensive Income		(In millions)						Operations / Consolidated Balance Sheets
Foreign Currency Translation
Foreign currency translation gain	$	—		$	0.2			Other income and (expense), net
Amortization of defined benefit pension and other post-retirement benefit plan items
Actuarial loss									$	2.5		$	1.8		Other income and (expense), net
Pension settlement										0.4			0.1		Other income and (expense), net
Prior service credits										(0.5	)		(0.7	)	Other income and (expense), net
Total before tax										2.4			1.2
Tax provision		—			—					(0.6	)		(0.3	)
Net of tax	$	—		$	0.2				$	1.8		$	0.9
Cash flow hedge - interest rate swap
Realized swap interest income	$	(0.4	)	$	(1.0	)		Interest and other expense on debt
Tax provision		0.2			0.3
Net of tax	$	(0.2	)	$	(0.7	)
Amortization of defined benefit pension and other post- retirement benefit plan items
Actuarial loss	$	1.8		$	5.6			Warehousing, delivery, selling, general, and administrative
Prior service credits		(0.7	)		(2.2	)		Warehousing, delivery, selling, general, and administrative
Total before tax		1.1			3.4
Realized swap interest									$	0.1		$	(0.3	)	Interest and other expense on debt
Tax benefit		(0.3	)		(0.9	)				—			0.1
Net of tax	$	0.8		$	2.5				$	0.1		$	(0.2	)

~~The following table details the reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2018:~~

We are a leading ~~metals service center that distributes~~value-added processor and ~~provides value-added processing~~distributor of industrial metals with operations in the United States, Canada, Mexico, and China. We purchase large quantities of metal products from primary producers and sell these materials in smaller quantities to a wide variety of metals-consuming industries. More than 75% of the metals products sold are processed by us by bending, beveling, blanking, blasting, burning, cutting-to-length, drilling, embossing, flattening, forming, grinding, laser cutting, machining, notching, painting, perforating, polishing, punching, rolling, sawing, scribing, shearing, slitting, ~~blanking, cutting to length,~~stamping, tapping, threading, welding, or other ~~techniques.~~techniques to process materials to a specified thickness, length, width, shape, and surface quality pursuant to specific customer orders.

The Company derives substantially all of its sales from the distribution of metals. The following table shows the Company’s percentage of sales by major product line:

A significant majority of the Company’s sales are attributable to its U.S. operations. The only operations attributed to foreign countries relate to the Company’s subsidiaries in Canada, China, and Mexico. The following table summarizes consolidated financial information of our operations by geographic location based on where sales originated:

Revenue is recognized either at a point in time or over time based on if the contract has an enforceable right to payment and the type of product that is being sold to the customer with products that are determined to have no alternative use being recognized over time. The following table summarizes revenues by the type of item sold:

A receivable is recognized in the period in which an invoice is issued, which is generally when the product is delivered to the customer. Payment terms on invoiced amounts are typically 30 days from the invoice date. We do not have any contracts with significant financing components.

Receivables, which are included in accounts receivables within the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet, from contracts with customers were ~~$510.6~~$494.2 million and ~~$523.5~~$428.6 million as of ~~September 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 and December 31, ~~2018,~~2019, respectively.

Contract assets, which consist primarily of revenues recognized over time that have not yet been invoiced and estimates of the value of inventory that will be received in conjunction with product returns, are reported in prepaid expenses and other current assets within the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. Contract liabilities, which consist primarily of accruals associated with amounts that will be paid to customers for volume rebates, cash discounts, sales returns and allowances, estimates of shipping and handling costs associated with performance obligations recorded over time, and bill and hold transactions are reported in other accrued liabilities within the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. Significant changes in the contract assets and the contract liabilities balances during the period are as follows:

The Company’s performance obligations are typically short-term in nature. As a result, the Company has elected the practical expedient that provides an exemption of the disclosure requirements regarding information about remaining performance obligations on contracts that have original expected durations of one year or less.

The Company adopted ASU 2016-13 as of January 1, 2020. Results for all reporting periods follow the guidance under ASC 326 “Financial Instruments – Credit Losses” with periods beginning after January 1, 2020 conforming to ASU 2016-13 while prior period amounts continue to be reported in accordance with previously applicable GAAP. Total adjustments as a result of adopting the new guidance were immaterial to the financial statements.

Provisions for allowances and claims on accounts receivables and contract assets are based upon historical rates, expected trends, and estimates of potential returns, allowances, customer discounts, and incentives. The Company considers all available information when assessing the adequacy of the provision for allowances, claims, and doubtful accounts.

The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of customers and sets credit limits based upon review of the customers’ current credit information, payment history, and the current economic and industry environments. The Company’s credit loss reserve consists of two parts: a) a provision for estimated credit losses based on historical experience and b) a reserve for specific customer collection issues that the Company has identified. Estimation of credit losses requires adjusting historical loss experience for current economic conditions and judgments about the probable effects of economic conditions on certain customers. We have reviewed recent events and circumstances due to the COVID-19 pandemic in relation to our provision for credit losses and have not made any material adjustments as of March 31, 2020.

The following table provides a reconciliation of the provision for credit losses reported within the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2020:

For the three months ended ~~September 30, 2019,~~March 31, 2020, the Company recorded income tax expense of $~~6.3~~2.9 million compared to ~~$2.0~~$13.0 million in the prior year. ~~For the nine months ended September 30, 2019, the Company recorded income tax expense of$24.8 million compared to $12.3 million in the prior year.~~ The ~~$6.3~~$2.9 million and the ~~$24.8~~$13.0 million tax expense for the ~~three-month~~three months ended March 31, 2020, and ~~nine-month periods ended September 30,~~ 2019, respectively, primarily ~~represent~~represents taxes at federal and local statutory rates where the Company operates, but generally excludes any tax benefit for losses in jurisdictions with historical losses. The lower effective tax rate in the first quarter of 2020 is primarily a result of a mix in earnings by jurisdiction in our first quarter pre-tax income compared to projected pre-tax income for the full year.

In accordance with ASC 740, “~~Income~~“Income Taxes,,” the Company calculates its quarterly tax provision based on an estimated effective tax rate for the year, applies it to the results of each interim period and then adjusts that amount by certain discrete items. Due to volatility in macro-economic conditions associated with the COVID-19 pandemic, we may experience fluctuations in our forecasted earnings before income taxes as a result of events which cannot be predicted. As such, the Company's effective tax rate could be subject to unusual volatility as forecasted earnings before income taxes change.

On March 27, 2020, President Trump signed into law the CARES Act, which, along with earlier issued IRS guidance, provides for deferral of certain taxes. The Company currently plans to defer the timing of estimated federal tax payments and payroll taxes as permitted by the CARES Act. Additionally, the Company intends to take advantage of accelerated Alternative Minimum Tax refunds as provided for in the CARES Act.

As required by ASC 740, the Company assesses the realizability of its deferred tax assets. The Company records a valuation allowance when, based upon the evaluation of all available evidence, it is more-likely-than-not that all or a portion of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. In making this determination, we analyze, among other things, our recent history of earnings, the nature and timing of reversing book-tax temporary differences, tax planning strategies, and future income. The Company maintains a valuation allowance on certain foreign and U.S. federal and state deferred tax assets until such time as in management’s judgment, considering all available positive and negative evidence, the Company determines that these deferred tax assets are more likely than not realizable. The valuation allowance is reviewed quarterly and will be maintained until sufficient positive evidence exists to support the reversal of some or all of the valuation allowance. The valuation allowance was ~~$29.3~~$13.7 million at ~~September 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 and December 31, ~~2018.~~2019.

The U.S. Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Act”) subjects a U.S. shareholder to tax on global intangible low-taxed income (“GILTI”) earned by certain foreign subsidiaries. The FASB Staff Q&A, Topic 740, No. 5, Accounting for Global Intangible Low-Taxed Income, states that an entity can make an accounting policy election to either recognize deferred taxes for temporary basis differences expected to reverse as GILTI in future years or provide for the tax expense related to GILTI in the year the tax is incurred. After considering the two options, the Company has elected to provide for the tax expense related to GILTI in the year the tax will occur. For the three-month ~~and nine-month~~ periods ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2020, and 2019, we have included ~~a $0.9~~tax expense of $1.2 million ~~tax benefit~~ and ~~a $1.9~~$3.1 million, ~~income tax expense,~~ respectively, related to GILTI as part of our tax provision.

Basic earnings per share attributable to Ryerson Holding’s common stock is determined based on earnings for the period divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share attributable to Ryerson Holding’s common stock considers the effect of potential common shares, unless inclusion of the potential common shares would have an antidilutive effect.

The following table sets forth the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share:

This Quarterly Report contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such statements can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “objectives,” “goals,” “preliminary,” “range,” “believes,” “expects,” “may,” “estimates,” “will,” “should,” “plans,” or “anticipates” or the negative thereof or other variations thereon or comparable terminology, or by discussions of strategy. Readers are cautioned that any such forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and may involve significant risks and uncertainties, and that actual results may vary materially from those anticipated or implied in the forward-looking statements as a result of various factors. These forward-looking statements involve a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those suggested by the forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements should, therefore, be considered in light of various factors, including those set forth under “Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” and “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2018~~2019 filed on March ~~5, 2019~~4, 2020 and the section entitled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Industry and Operating Trends” and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Moreover, we caution you not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date they were made. We do not undertake any obligation to publicly release any revisions to these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this Quarterly Report or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and related Notes thereto in Item 1, “Financial Statements” in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and our Consolidated Financial Statements and related Notes thereto for the year ended December 31, ~~2018~~2019 in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March ~~5, 2019.~~4, 2020.

We are a metals service center with over 175 years of experience providing value-added processing and distribution of industrial metals with operations in the United States, Canada, Mexico, and China. We purchase large quantities of metal products from primary producers and sell these materials in smaller quantities to a wide variety of metals-consuming industries. ~~More~~We carry a full line of nearly 75,000 products in stainless steel, aluminum, carbon steel, and alloy steels and a limited line of nickel and red metals in various shapes and forms. In addition to our metals products, we offer numerous value-added processing and fabrication services, and more than 75% of the ~~metals~~ products ~~sold~~we sell are processed by us by bending, beveling, blanking, blasting, burning, cutting-to-length, drilling, embossing, flattening, forming, grinding, laser cutting, machining, notching, painting, perforating, polishing, punching, rolling, sawing, scribing, shearing, slitting, stamping, tapping, threading, welding, or other techniques to ~~process materials~~meet customer requirements. See Note 12: Revenue Recognition in Part I, Item I - Notes to ~~a specified thickness, length, width, shape, and surface quality pursuant to specific customer orders.~~the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Similar to other metals service centers, we maintain substantial inventories of metals to accommodate the short lead times and just-in-time delivery requirements of our customers. Accordingly, we purchase metals to maintain our inventory at levels that we believe to be appropriate to satisfy the anticipated needs of our customers based upon customer forecasts, historic buying practices, supply agreements with customers, mill lead times, and market conditions. Our commitments to purchase metals are generally at prevailing market prices in effect at the time we place our orders. At the request of our customers, we have entered into swaps in order to mitigate our customers’ risk of volatility in the price of metals and we have entered into metals hedges to mitigate our own risk of volatility in the price of metals. We have no long-term, fixed-price metals purchase contracts. When metals prices decline, customer demands for lower prices and our competitors’ responses to those demands could result in lower sale prices and, consequently, lower gross profits and earnings as we sell existing metals inventory. ~~When~~Conversely, when metals prices increase, competitive conditions will influence how much of the price increase we may pass on to our customers.

The metals service center industry is cyclical and volatile in both pricing and demand, and therefore difficult to predict. In the ~~nine-month~~three-month period ended ~~September 30, 2019,~~March 31, 2020, Ryerson experienced ~~stronger~~both weaker pricing ~~with weaker~~and demand ~~on a same-store basis, which excludes~~compared to the ~~results of our acquisition of Central Steel & Wire Company (“CS&W”). Ryerson’s same-store~~three-month period ended March 31, 2019, with average selling prices ~~were 2.0% higher~~10.2% lower and shipments 8.6% lower, affected by end-market weakness in the ~~nine-month period ended September 30, 2019 compared to~~U.S. and impacts of the ~~same period last year.~~novel coronavirus (“COVID-19”) in China and North America. Changes in average selling prices are primarily driven by commodity metals prices, which typically impact Ryerson’s selling prices over the subsequent three to six-month period.

According to the Metal Service Center Institute, North American service center volumes declined by ~~6.9%~~1.6% in the ~~nine-month~~three-month period ended ~~September 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 compared to the year-ago period. ~~However, on~~On a North American ~~same-store~~ basis, Ryerson’s tons sold ~~declined~~contraction outpaced the industry, declining by ~~0.6%, reflecting Ryerson’s market share gains~~8.1% during the period. ~~With regards to~~Demand softness was experienced across all of Ryerson’s end markets ~~Ryerson’s tons sold declined~~ in the ~~nine-month period ended September 30, 2019 on a same-store basis~~first quarter, most significantly in ~~the~~construction, oil and gas, ~~food~~commercial ground transportation, and ~~agricultural equipment,~~ consumer durable sectors on a year over year basis. When customer demand falls, our operations typically generate increased cash flow as our working capital needs decrease.

The global outbreak of COVID-19 was declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization and ~~industrial sectors,~~a national emergency by the U.S. government in March 2020 and has negatively affected the U.S. and global economies, disrupted global supply chains, resulted in significant travel and transport restrictions, mandated closures and stay-at-home orders, and created significant disruption of the financial markets.

In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, Ryerson has implemented several policies and procedures to protect the health and welfare of our employees first and foremost while operating as an essential business, and maintaining our liquidity.

We have communicated and enforced social distancing practices by implementing work from home arrangements, alternating employee shifts, eliminating congregation, and suspending non-essential travel. We have also mobilized a task force and engaged our communications team to establish open lines of communications for our employees to ensure that all members of the Ryerson team are informed and supported throughout the pandemic.

The extent of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our operational and financial performance will depend on future developments, including the duration and spread of the pandemic and related actions taken by the U.S. government and state and local government officials to prevent disease spread, all of which are uncertain and cannot be predicted. All of our facilities, except for two in Mexico which are temporarily closed, have continued to operate during stay-at-home mandates due to Ryerson being deemed an essential business by state and local government authorities. However, facility closures, work slowdowns, or temporary stoppages could occur, and we are seeing negative impacts on demand from closures among our customers. At this time, a number of Ryerson’s customers have either temporarily closed operations or reduced activity in response to the COVID-19 pandemic and government-mandated stay-at-home orders or decreasing demand for their products. Ryerson’s second quarter demand to date has been negatively impacted by the pandemic and we expect the third quarter to be impacted given continued economic pressure, although the ultimate impact of COVID-19 remains uncertain. Further, we anticipate that the weakened economic environment will negatively impact metals pricing, which may result in gross margin contraction, despite partially ~~offset~~offsetting support from decreased mill capacity given the announced temporary closure or idling of several facilities.

In our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 4, 2020, we noted that China continues to be a key driver in the growth of global metals demand and cited the International Monetary Fund’s projected Chinese GDP growth of over 6 percent for 2020. However, on April 14, 2020, the International Monetary Fund predicted that, as a result of COVID-19, the global economy will contract by ~~growth~~3%, the U.S. will contract by 5.9%, and China will grow by only 1.2% in ~~HVAC, ground transportation, metal fabrication~~2020. These projections represent decreases of 6.3%, 7.9%, and ~~machine shop,~~4.8%, respectively, compared to the World Economic Outlook Report published in January, and ~~construction sectors.~~we anticipate that the global metals demand environment will be affected accordingly.

As the COVID-19 pandemic’s effects on the manufacturing economy develop, Ryerson is carefully monitoring the current and potential future impacts to its supply chain. In response to decreased demand, several mills have announced temporary closures and/or idled facilities, effectively reducing overall capacity. However, Ryerson has not experienced a disruption to its supply chain and has been able to meet customer demand as there exists an abundance of material available with short lead times. With Ryerson’s national scale and interconnected network, including 95 facilities in North America, we are able to move inventory intelligently throughout the network to meet customer’s needs. As the second quarter progresses, we remain diligently responsive to the depressed demand environment, limiting our material purchases, and effectively managing inventory levels while continuing to monitor market prices and lead times through the pervasive market uncertainty.

Furthermore, although Ryerson is always mindful of our liquidity position, in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, we have deployed a dedicated team to closely monitor all critical areas daily including cash positioning and credit line availability and projections, while being ever mindful of our covenant requirements and working capital needs. We are actively managing relationships with our customers and vendors to ensure that we are in balance with regards to our receivables and payables. Examples of specific actions taken in response to COVID-19 include increased focus on working capital management with targeted inventory reductions, receivables risk assessment, limiting discretionary spending, temporarily furloughing employees or reducing work hours, reducing executive and salaried employee pay, delaying salary increases, eliminating non-essential travel, delaying or reducing hiring activities, deferring certain discretionary capital expenditures, payroll tax and pension contribution deferrals, and accelerating Alternative Minimum Tax credit refunds as provided for under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (“The CARES Act”). The CARES Act, among other newly issued legislation, contains numerous other provisions which may benefit the Company. The CARES Act did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial condition or results of operations as of and for the three months ended March 31, 2020. The Company intends to continue to assess the effect of the CARES Act and ongoing government guidance related to COVID-19 that may be issued and intends to take advantage of all opportunities to further support our balance sheet. With respect to liquidity for the quarter, we took the actions listed above to bolster our financial condition and have contingency plans in place to reduce costs while supporting business operations. We borrowed $166 million under the Company’s $1.0 billion revolving credit facility (the “Ryerson Credit Facility”) to ensure access to cash.

On ~~April 19, 2017,~~March 1, 2018, the ~~Commerce Department initiated~~White House announced a 25% tariff on all imported steel products and 10% tariff on all imported aluminum products for an ~~investigation pursuant to~~indefinite amount of time under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion ~~Act, as amended~~Act. Subsequently, the White House announced steel quotas, in lieu of tariffs, with South Korea. On May 1, 2018, the White House further announced agreements-in-principle with Argentina, Australia, and Brazil for permanent exemptions from the tariffs in exchange for export quotas or voluntary export restraints, with the exception of Australia which has not agreed to quotas at the time of this report. In May 2019, steel tariffs put in place on Turkey in August of 2018 with the intention of offsetting the weakening Turkish Lira were revised down to 25% from 50%.

Further trade actions announced by the U.S. under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 ~~(“Section 232”)~~imposed various levels of tariffs and duties on imported Chinese goods with China reciprocating in kind on American goods. These tariffs have had a favorable impact on the prices of the products we sell and our results of operations. If these or other tariffs or duties expire or if others are relaxed or repealed, or if relatively higher U.S. metal prices make it attractive for foreign metal producers to export their products to the U.S., ~~into whether~~despite the presence of duties or tariffs, the resurgence of substantial imports of foreign steel ~~into~~could create downward pressure on U.S. metal prices which could have a material adverse effect on our potential earnings and future results of operations.

On January 15, 2020, the ~~U.S. pose a threat to U.S. national security. On March 8, 2018, President Trump~~United States and China signed a proclamation pursuant to Section 232 imposing a 25 percent tariff on imported steel. Following the proclamation, the U.S. government announced various agreements for exemptions from the Section 232 steel

tariffs for certain countries, including Argentina, Australia, Brazil, and South Korea. Some of these countries, such as South Korea and Brazil, have agreed to a quota system that limits their annual imports of steel into the U.S. In addition, although steel products from the European Union, Canada, and Mexico were initially exempted from the tariff, on June 1, 2018, those exemptions expired and the Section 232 tariff was applied to steel imports from these countries as well. On May 17, 2019,phase one trade agreement in which the U.S. agreed not to ~~lift~~proceed with tariffs that had been scheduled to take effect December 15 and cut Section ~~232~~301 duties related to the September 1 tariffs on ~~Canada and Mexico when they~~$120 billion in Chinese goods in half, from 15% to 7.5%, effective February 14, 2020. In return, China agreed to ~~increased enforcement to ensure low-priced Chinese imports do not come into~~increase its purchases of U.S. manufactured goods, agricultural products, energy, and services by a total of $200 billion over 2017 levels in the two years through December 2021. However, negotiations with China are ongoing and the U.S. ~~market.~~

~~Foreign administrations have responded~~will maintain 25% tariffs on another $250 billion of Chinese products while China maintains retaliatory tariffs on some U.S. goods. Further, in response to the ~~trade actions imposed by~~COVID-19 outbreak, members of the ~~U.S.~~Senate Finance Committee have urged President Trump to ease tariff restrictions on health and safety products and pause Buy American requirements for medical goods and equipment, but this movement was met with ~~trade actions in kind, adding further uncertainty to U.S. pricing~~opposition from steel industry groups and ~~supply conditions.~~the administration, leaving potential amendment uncertain.

~~In November 2018,~~As of March 13, 2020, the ~~United States, Canada, and Mexico leaders signed the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement~~U.S.-Mexico-Canada-Agreement (“USMCA”), which is designed to replace the North American Free Trade Agreement (“NAFTA”)~~; however, this agreement has not been~~, was ratified by all three countries. Though its implementation date is yet to be determined, there has recently been a call for delay due to potential time and resource constraints driven by the ~~United States or Canada at the time of this release.~~

~~On July 2, 2018 (“the acquisition date”) JT~~COVID-19 outbreak. However, once implemented, Ryerson purchased CS&W. CS&W is a leading metal service center with locations across the Central and Eastern United States offering a wide selection of products and capabilities, with a commercial portfolio centered on bar, tube, plate, and steel products. CS&W expanded our long, tube, and plate portfolio. Our combined commercial, operational, and processing strengths will provide a broader and deeper array of products to our customers in the Midwest and Northeast United States. The fair valueexpects that passage of the ~~consideration totaled $163.5 million on the acquisition date. Included~~USMCA will support demand for North American steel through strengthening of rules of origin for steel-intensive goods and will continue to provide tariff-free trade access in the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2019 financial results is revenue of $134.3 million and $460.8 million, and a net loss of $0.8 million and net income of $1.4 million, respectively, from CS&W.North American markets.

We generate substantially all of our revenue from sales of our metals products. The majority of revenue is recognized upon delivery of product to customers. The timing of shipment is substantially the same as the timing of delivery to customers given the proximity of our distribution sites to our customers. Revenues associated with products which we believe have no alternative use, and where the Company has an enforceable right to payment, are recognized on an over-time basis. Over-time revenues are recorded in proportion with the progress made toward completing the performance obligation.

Sales, cost of materials sold, gross profit, and operating expense control are the principal factors that impact our profitability.

Net sales. Our sales volume and pricing are driven by market demand, which is largely determined by overall industrial production and conditions in the specific industries in which our customers operate. Sales prices are also primarily driven by market factors such as overall demand and availability of product. Our net sales include revenue from product sales, net of returns, allowances, customer discounts, and incentives.

Cost of materials sold. Cost of materials sold includes metal purchase and in-bound freight costs, third-party processing costs, and direct and indirect internal processing costs. The cost of materials sold fluctuates with our sales volume and our ability to purchase metals at competitive prices. Increases in sales volume generally enable us to improve purchasing leverage with suppliers, as we buy larger quantities of metals inventories.

Gross profit. Gross profit is the difference between net sales and the cost of materials sold. Our sales prices to our customers are subject to market competition. Achieving acceptable levels of gross profit is dependent on our acquiring metals at competitive prices, our ability to manage the impact of changing prices, and efficiently managing our internal and external processing costs.

Operating expenses. Optimizing business processes and asset utilization to lower fixed expenses such as employee, facility, and truck fleet costs, which cannot be rapidly reduced in times of declining volume, and maintaining a low fixed cost structure in times of increasing sales volume, have a significant impact on our profitability. Operating expenses include costs related to warehousing and distributing our products as well as selling, general, and administrative expenses.

Results of Operations — Comparison of Three ~~and Nine~~ Months Ended ~~September 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 to Three ~~and Nine~~ Months Ended ~~September 30, 2018~~March 31, 2019

The following table sets forth our condensed consolidated statements of income data for the ~~three-month~~three months ended March 31, 2020 and ~~nine-month periods ended September 30, 2019 and 2018:~~2019:

	Three Months Ended September 30,											Nine Months Ended September 30,											Three Months Ended March 31,
	2019						2018					2019						2018					2020						2019
	$			% of Net Sales			$		% of Net Sales			$			% of Net Sales			$		% of Net Sales			$			% of Net Sales			$			% of Net Sales
	($ in millions)											($ in millions)											($ in millions)
Net sales	$	1,104.4			100.0	%	$	1,250.0		100.0	%	$	3,540.1			100.0	%	$	3,248.4		100.0	%	$	1,010.3			100.0	%	$	1,230.8			100.0	%
Cost of materials sold		900.0			81.5			1,041.8		83.3			2,892.6			81.7			2,690.0		82.8			814.5			80.6			999.5			81.2
Gross profit		204.4			18.5			208.2		16.7			647.5			18.3			558.4		17.2			195.8			19.4			231.3			18.8
Warehousing, delivery, selling, general, and administrative expenses		165.6			15.0			174.0		13.9			493.9			14.0			443.4		13.6			155.7			15.4			163.7			13.3
Gain on insurance settlement		(1.5	)		(0.1	)		—		—			(1.5	)		—			—		—
Restructuring and other charges		0.3			—			2.7		0.3			1.7			—			2.7		0.1			—			—			0.3			—
Operating profit		40.0			3.6			31.5		2.5			153.4			4.3			112.3		3.5			40.1			4.0			67.3			5.5
Other (expenses) and income		(23.5	)		(2.1	)		48.2		3.9			(72.3	)		(2.0	)		5.7		0.1			(20.8	)		(2.1	)		(24.7	)		(2.0	)
Income before income taxes		16.5			1.5			79.7		6.4			81.1			2.3			118.0		3.6			19.3			1.9			42.6			3.5
Provision for income taxes		6.3			0.6			2.0		0.2			24.8			0.7			12.3		0.4			2.9			0.3			13.0			1.1
Net income		10.2			0.9			77.7		6.2			56.3			1.6			105.7		3.2			16.4			1.6			29.6			2.4
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest		0.1			—			0.2		—			0.3			—			0.3		—			—			—			0.1			—
Net income attributable to Ryerson Holding Corporation	$	10.1			0.9	%	$	77.5		6.2	%	$	56.0			1.6	%	$	105.4		3.2	%	$	16.4			1.6	%	$	29.5			2.4	%
Basic earnings per share	$	0.27					$	2.08				$	1.49					$	2.83				$	0.43					$	0.79
Diluted earnings per share	$	0.27					$	2.06				$	1.48					$	2.80				$	0.43					$	0.78

The following table shows our percentage of sales revenue by major product lines for the three months ended March 31, 2020 and ~~nine month periods ended September 30, 2019 and 2018:~~2019:

September 30,

Dollar

Percentage

2019

2018

change

change

($ in millions)

Net sales (three-months ended)

$
1,104.4

$
1,250.0

$
(145.6
)

(11.6
)%
Net sales (nine-months ended)

$
3,540.1

$
3,248.4

$
291.7

9.0
%
Net sales, same-store (nine-months ended)

$
3,079.3

$
3,070.2

$
9.1

0.3
%

September 30,

Tons

Percentage

2019

2018

change

change

(in thousands)

Tons sold (three-months ended)

598

622

(24
)

(3.9
)%
Tons sold (nine-months ended)

1,840

1,691

149

8.8
%
Tons sold, same-store (nine-months ended)

1,571

1,597

(26
)

(1.6
)%

September 30,

Price

Percentage

2019

2018

change

change

Average selling price per ton sold (three-months ended)

$
1,847

$
2,010

$
(163
)

(8.1
)%
Average selling price per ton sold (nine-months ended)

$
1,924

$
1,921

$
3

0.2
%
Average selling price per ton sold, same-store (nine-months ended)

$
1,960

$
1,922

$
38

2.0
%

	March 31,				Dollar			Percentage
	2020		2019		change			change
	($ in millions)
Net sales	$	1,010.3	$	1,230.8	$	(220.5	)		(17.9	)%

	March 31,				Tons			Percentage
	2020		2019		change			change
	(in thousands)

Tons sold		566		619		(53	)		(8.6	)%

	March 31,				Price			Percentage
	2020		2019		change			change
Average selling price per ton sold	$	1,785	$	1,988	$	(203	)		(10.2	)%

Revenue for the three-month period ended ~~September 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 decreased from the same period a year ago reflecting a slowdown in the metals market ~~while revenue for the nine-month period ending September 30, 2019 increased~~that was a continuation from the ~~same period a year ago reflecting higher tons sold due to~~decline in the ~~acquisition~~industry in 2019, and was further negatively impacted by the global outbreak of ~~CS&W on July 2, 2018 as well as higher metal commodity prices.~~COVID-19 during the first quarter of 2020. Compared to the year ago period, average selling price decreased for all of our product lines in the three-month period ended ~~September 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 with the largest decreases in our ~~stainless~~carbon plate, carbon flat, and ~~carbon~~aluminum plate products. Tons sold decreased in the three-month period ended ~~September 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 for nearly all of our product lines with the largest decreases in our aluminum ~~plate, aluminum long,~~flat, carbon long, and ~~stainless flat~~carbon plate product lines, partially offset by ~~an increase in stainless plate product sold.~~

~~In the nine-month period ended September 30, 2019, excluding CS&W (same-store results), average selling price increased slightly compared to the same period a year ago with the largest~~ increases in ~~our aluminum plate, aluminum flat, and carbon plate products, largely offset by declines in the average selling price of stainless plate and carbon flat products. Same-store tons sold~~ ~~decreased slightly in the nine-month period ended September 30, 2019 compared to the year ago period,~~ ~~with decreases in shipments of our aluminum plate, carbon plate, and stainless flat largely offset by increases in shipments of stainless long,~~ stainless plate and aluminum ~~flat~~plate product ~~lines.~~sold.

The decrease in cost of materials sold in the three-month period ended ~~September 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 compared to the year ago period is primarily due to ~~the decrease in tons sold and~~ a decrease in average cost of materials sold per ~~ton.~~ton and the decrease in tons sold. The average cost of materials sold decreased across almost all product lines with the average cost of materials sold for our ~~stainless~~carbon plate, carbon ~~plate,~~flat, and carbon ~~flat~~long product lines decreasing more than our other ~~products~~product lines during the three-month period ended ~~September 30, 2019.~~March 31, 2020. ~~The increase in cost of materials sold in the nine-month period ended September 30, 2019 compared to the year ago period is primarily due to the increase in tons sold due to the acquisition of CS&W.~~ During the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2019,~~2020, LIFO income was $~~29.6~~20.2 million compared to LIFO ~~expense~~income of ~~$32.1~~$20.1 million in the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2018. During the first nine months of 2019, LIFO income was $62.6 million compared to LIFO expense of $89.3 million in the first nine months of 2018.~~2019.

Gross profit decreased in the three-month period ended ~~September 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 compared to the year ago period due to the decrease in tons sold. While our revenue per ton decreased in the three months ended ~~September 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 as compared to the three months ended ~~September 30, 2018,~~March 31, 2019, cost of materials sold per ton decreased at a faster pace resulting in higher gross margins. Gross profit increased in the first nine months of 2019 compared to the first nine months of 2018 due to the increase in tons sold. Gross margins in the nine-month period ended September 30, 2019 increased compared to the nine-month period ended September 30, 2018 as a slight increase in average selling price per ton was further aided by a slight decrease in the cost of materials sold per ton.

September 30,

2019

2018

$

% of Net
Sales

$

% of Net
Sales

Dollar change

Percentage change

($ in millions)

Warehousing, delivery, selling, general, and administrative expenses (three-months ended)

$
165.6

15.0
%

$
174.0

13.9
%

$
(8.4
)

(4.8
)%
Warehousing, delivery, selling, general, and administrative expenses (nine-months ended)

$
493.9

14.0
%

$
443.4

13.6
%

$
50.5

11.4
%
Warehousing, delivery, selling, general, and administrative expenses, same-store (nine-months ended)

$
402.7

13.1
%

$
409.4

13.3
%

$
(6.7
)

(1.6
)%
Gain on insurance settlement (three-months ended)

$
(1.5
)

(0.1
)%

$
—

—

$
(1.5
)

—

Gain on insurance settlement (nine-months ended)

$
(1.5
)

—

$
—

—

$
(1.5
)

—

Restructuring and other charges (three-months ended)

$
0.3

—

$
2.7

0.3
%

$
(2.4
)

(88.9
)%
Restructuring and other charges (nine-months ended)

$
1.7

—

$
2.7

0.1
%

$
(1.0
)

(37.0
)%

	March 31,
	2020					2019
	$		% of Net Sales			$		% of Net Sales			Dollar change			Percentage change
	($ in millions)
Warehousing, delivery, selling, general, and administrative expenses	$	155.7		15.4	%	$	163.7		13.3	%	$	(8.0	)		(4.9	)%
Restructuring and other charges	$	—		—		$	0.3		—		$	(0.3	)		(100.0	)%

Total operating expenses decreased in the three-month period ended ~~September 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 compared to the year ago period primarily due to lower incentive compensation of ~~$12.8~~$3.0 million, lower salaries and wages of $2.2 million, lower operating supplies of $1.1 million, lower depreciation expense of $1.0 million, and lower delivery expenses of $0.9 million due to lower shipments, partially offset by higher ~~facility expenses of $2.6 million, primarily caused by higher depreciation expense and~~ rent expense ~~and higher consultant fees~~ of ~~$2.4 million.~~$1.2 million due to a sale-leaseback transaction on nine of our real estate properties that was executed in the fourth quarter of 2019.

Our operating ~~expenses~~profit decreased in the first ~~nine~~three months of 2020 compared to the first three months of 2019, ~~increased~~primarily due to decreases in average selling prices and tons sold, slightly offset by lower operating expenses.

Interest and other expense on debt decreased in the three-month period ended March 31, 2020 compared to the year ago period due to ~~the acquisition~~a lower level of CS&W on July 2, 2018. Excluding restructuring charges, the first nine months of 2019 included $91.2 million of operating expenses at CS&W compared to $34.0 million of operating expenses at CS&W in the nine-month period ended September 30, 2018. Excluding CS&W, operating expenses decreased by $6.7 million in the nine-month period ended September 30, 2019, primarily due to lower incentive compensation expense of $27.7 million. Offsetting the lower incentive compensation was highercredit facility expenses of $7.7 million, primarily caused by higher depreciation and rent expense, higher consultant fees of $6.2 million, higher employee benefit costs of $1.8 million, higher delivery expenses of $1.4 million, and higher salaries and wages of $1.2 million. The three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2019 included a gain on insurance settlement of $1.5 million. The restructuring charges of $0.3 million in the third quarter of 2019 and $1.7 million in the first nine months of 2019 are related primarily to severance costs for corporate staff reductions.

~~Our operating profit increased in the first nine months of 2019 compared to the first nine months of 2018, primarily due to higher gross margins and revenue.~~

~~Interest and other expense on debt decreased slightly in the three-month and nine-month periods ended~~ ~~September 30, 2019~~borrowings outstanding compared to the year ago ~~periods due~~period related to lower working capital requirements resulting from a slowing metals market, lower interest rates on credit facility borrowings, and to a ~~$62.1~~$54.6 million decrease in the outstanding amount of our 11.00% Notes due in 2022 (the “2022 Notes”) which were repurchased in the ~~fourth~~first quarter of ~~2018 and~~2020. Credit facility borrowings were at a lower level in the first three months of 2020 compared to the first three months of 2019 despite having borrowed approximately $166 million of funds at March 31, 2020 to maintain access to cash during the COVID-19 pandemic. Interest expense in the first quarter of 2020 included a $0.3 million charge to recognize unamortized bond issuance costs related to the

$54.6 million of 2022 Notes repurchased during the period, The other income in the first quarter of 2020 includes a $0.8 million gain on the repurchase of the 2022 Notes. The other expense in the first quarter of 2019 and from a lower level of credit facility borrowings outstanding compared to the year ago period due to lower working capital requirements resulting from a slowing metals market. Interest and other expense on debt in the nine-month period ended September 30, 2019 was negatively impacted from higher credit facility borrowings resulting from the acquisition of CS&W on July 2, 2018. The other expense in the three-month and nine-month periods ended ~~September 30, 2019~~includes ~~$0.4 million and $1.2~~$0.6 million of foreign currency losses, respectively. The other income in the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2018 includes a $73.2 million gain on the bargain purchase of CS&W, a credit from net periodic benefit cost other than service cost, and foreign currency losses in the third quarter of 2018 and foreign currency gains in the first nine months of 2018.losses.

Provision for income taxes. In the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2019,~~2020, the Company recorded income tax expense of $~~6.3~~2.9 million compared to ~~$2.0 million in the third quarter of 2018. In the first nine months of 2019, the Company recorded income tax expense of $24.8 million compared to $12.3~~$13.0 million in the first ~~nine months~~quarter of ~~2018.~~2019. The income tax expense recorded in all periods primarily ~~represent~~represents taxes at federal and local statutory rates where the Company operates, but generally ~~exclude~~excludes any tax benefit for losses in jurisdictions with historical losses.

Earnings per share. Basic earnings per share was ~~$0.27 in the third quarter of 2019 and $1.49~~$0.43 in the first ~~nine months~~quarter of ~~2019~~2020 compared to basic earnings per share of ~~$2.08 in the third quarter of 2018 and $2.83~~$0.79 in the first ~~nine months~~quarter of ~~2018.~~2019. Diluted earnings per share was ~~$0.27 in the third quarter of 2019and $1.48~~$0.43 in the first ~~nine months~~quarter of ~~2019~~2020 compared to ~~$2.06 in the third quarter of 2018 and $2.80~~$0.78 in the first ~~nine months~~quarter of ~~2018.~~2019. The changes in earnings per share are due to the results of operations discussed above.

Our primary sources of liquidity are cash and cash equivalents, cash flows from operations, and borrowing availability under the ~~$1.0 billion revolving credit facility (the “Ryerson~~Ryerson Credit ~~Facility”)~~Facility that matures on November 16, 2021. Its principal source of operating cash is from the sale of metals and other materials. Its principal uses of cash are for payments associated with the procurement and processing of metals and other materials inventories, costs incurred for the warehousing and delivery of inventories, and the selling and administrative costs of the business, capital expenditures, and for interest payments on debt.

The ~~following table summarizes~~global COVID-19 pandemic has led to disruption and volatility in the ~~Company’s~~global capital markets, which, depending on future developments, could adversely impact our capital resources and liquidity in the future. As a proactive, precautionary measure, we borrowed approximately $166 million under the Ryerson Credit Facility in the first quarter of 2020 to maintain access to cash ~~flows:~~

Weduring the COVID-19 pandemic. Accordingly, we had cash and cash equivalents of $~~21.8~~188.3 million at ~~September 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020, compared to ~~$23.2~~$11.0 million at December 31, ~~2018. We had $1,039~~2019. The extra borrowing increased our total debt outstanding at March 31, 2020 to $1,096 million ~~and $1,153~~compared to $982 million of total debt outstanding at ~~September 30, 2019 and~~ December 31, ~~2018, respectively, and~~2019. We had a debt-to-capitalization ratio of ~~88%~~86% and 85% at ~~September 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 and ~~94%~~ at December 31, ~~2018.~~2019, respectively. We had total liquidity (defined as cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash from sales of property, plant, and equipment, marketable securities, and availability under the Ryerson Credit Facility and foreign debt facilities, less qualified cash pledged as collateral) of ~~$455~~$396 million at ~~September 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 versus ~~$441~~$439 million at December 31, ~~2018.~~2019. Our net debt (defined as total debt less cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash from sales of property, plant, and equipment, and marketable securities) was $893 million and $923 million at March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively. Total liquidity isand net debt are not a U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) financial ~~measure.~~measures. We believe that total liquidity provides additional information for measuring our ability to fund our operations. Total liquidity does not represent, and should not be used as a substitute for, net income or cash flows from operations as determined in accordance with GAAP and total liquidity is not necessarily an indication of whether cash flow will be sufficient to fund our cash requirements. We believe that net debt provides a clearer perspective of the Company’s overall debt situation. Net debt should not be used as a substitute for total debt outstanding as determined in accordance with GAAP.

Of the total cash and cash equivalents, as of ~~September 30, 2019,~~March 31, 2020, $~~7.9~~12.5 million was held in subsidiaries outside the United States which is deemed to be permanently reinvested. Ryerson does not currently foresee a need to repatriate earnings from its non-U.S.

subsidiaries. Although Ryerson has historically satisfied needs for more capital in the U.S. through debt or equity issuances, Ryerson could elect to repatriate earnings held in foreign jurisdictions, which could result in higher effective tax rates. We have not recorded a deferred tax liability for the effect of a possible repatriation of these earnings as management intends to permanently reinvest these earnings outside of the U.S. Specific plans for reinvestment include funding for future international acquisitions and funding of existing international operations.

Operating activities. ~~Net~~Working capital fluctuates throughout the year based on business needs. Working capital needs tend to be counter-cyclical, meaning that in periods of expansion the Company will use cash ~~provided by operating activities~~to fund working capital requirements, but in periods of ~~$130.5 million in~~contraction the first nine months of 2019 was primarily due to net income of $56.3 million in the first nine months of 2019, non-cash depreciation and amortization expense of $44.3 million, an increase in deferred income tax liability of $41.4 million, and a decrease in accounts receivable of $12.4 million. Partially offsetting theCompany will generate cash ~~inflows were pension contributions of $20.9 million. Net cash used in operating activities of $62.4 million in the first nine months of 2018 was primarily due to an~~from reduced working capital requirements. The increase in accounts receivable in both first quarter periods is the result of ~~$148.9 million resulting from~~ higher sales levels during the second half of the first quarter compared to the second half of the fourth quarter of the prior year. Inventory levels did not increase significantly in the first quarter of 2020 as compared to the prior year period in response to weaker market conditions in the first quarter of 2020.The increase in inventory in the first quarter of 2019 is due to higher inventory levels to support higher sales in the second quarter of 2019 compared to year-end 2018. The increase in accounts payable at the end of the ~~third~~first quarter ~~of 2018 compared~~in both periods is related to ~~year-end 2017, an increase in inventory of $116.4 million as the value of inventory~~increased purchases and ~~the tons in inventory both increased as economic conditions in the metals market improved~~operating activities in the first ~~nine months~~quarter associated with increased sales compared to the fourth quarter of ~~2018, a non-cash gain on~~ the ~~bargain purchase~~prior year.

Investing activities. The Company's main investing activities are capital expenditures and proceeds from the sale of ~~Central Steel of $73.2~~property, plant, and equipment. Capital expenditures have decreased year-over-year as the Company reduced the annual capital expenditures budget from $45 million ~~and pension contributions of $22.2 million. Partially offsetting the cash outflows was an increase in accounts payable of $117.9~~to $25 million due to ~~a higher level of material purchases at the end of the third quarter of 2018 compared~~COVID-19. At this time we are limiting capital spending to ~~year-end 2017, net income in the first nine months of 2018 of $105.7 million, non-cash depreciation and amortization expense of $37.2 million, and an increase in accrued liabilities of $33.1 million.~~

~~Investing activities.~~Capital expenditures during the first nine months of 2019 totaled $32.5 million compared to $29.7 million in the first nine months of 2018. During the first nine months of 2018 we paid $173.5 million, net of cash acquired, to purchase CS&W and Fanello Industries. ~~The Company sold property, plant, and equipment and assets held for sale generating cash proceeds of $8.8 million and $0.7 million during the first nine months of 2019 and 2018, respectively.~~critical sustaining projects.

Financing activities. ~~Net~~The Company's main source of liquidity to fund working capital requirements is borrowings on its credit facility. While the Company anticipates its current cash ~~used in financing activities~~balances, cash flows from operations, and available sources of liquidity will be sufficient to meet its cash requirements, in the first ~~ninemonths~~quarter of ~~2019 was $109.9~~2020 approximately $166 million ~~compared~~of funds were borrowed at March 31, 2020 to ~~net~~maintain access to cash ~~provided by financing activities of $218.1~~during the COVID-19 pandemic. In addition, we repurchased $54.2 million in the first nine months of 2018. Net cash used in financing activities in the first nine months of 2019 was primarily related to a decrease in credit facility borrowings of $107.4 million, primarily resulting from

~~the net cash provided by operating activities,~~ and ~~repurchases of~~ $11.8 million of our 2022 ~~Notes. Net cash provided by financing activities~~Notes in the first ~~nine months~~quarter of ~~2018 was primarily related to an increase in credit facility borrowings~~2020 and 2019, respectively. Book overdrafts fluctuate based on the timing of $209.6 million, primarily to finance the acquisitions of CS&W and Fanello Industries and to fund higher working capital requirements, an increase in book overdrafts of $15.6 million, and proceeds of $4.5 million from sale-leaseback transactions, partially offset by $10.5 million of principal payments under capital lease obligations.payments.

We believe that cash flow from operations and proceeds from the Ryerson Credit Facility will provide sufficient funds to meet our contractual obligations and operating requirements in the normal course of business.

~~As a result~~Total debt in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet increased to $1,096.1 million at March 31, 2020 from $981.8 million at December 31, 2019, mainly due to additional borrowings under the Ryerson Credit Facility during March 2020 to maintain access to cash during the uncertainty of the COVID-19 pandemic, partially offset by the net cash provided by operating activities in the first ~~nine~~three months of ~~2019, total debt in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets in the first~~ ~~nine~~2020 ~~months of 2019 decreased to $1,038.6~~ ~~million at September 30, 2019 from $1,153.3~~ ~~million at December 31, 2018.~~.

Total debt outstanding as of ~~September 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 consisted of the following amounts: ~~$440.6~~$546.3 million borrowings under the Ryerson Credit Facility, ~~$587.9~~$533.3 million under the 2022 Notes, ~~$7.5~~$12.7 million of foreign debt, and ~~$9.9~~$9.1 million of other debt, less ~~$7.3~~$5.3 million of unamortized debt issuance costs. ~~Discussion of each of the significant borrowings follows.~~

On November 16, 2016, Ryerson entered into an amendment with respect to its $1.0 billion revolving credit facility (as amended, the “Old Credit Facility”), to reduce the total facility size from $1.0 billion to $750 million, reduce the interest rate on outstanding borrowings by 25 basis points, reduce commitment fees on amounts not borrowed by 2.5 basis points, and to extend the maturity date to November 16, 2021. On June 28, 2018, Ryerson entered into a second amendment with respectFor further information, see Note 7: Long Term Debt in Part I, Item I - Notes to the ~~Old Credit Facility to increase the facility size from $750 million to $1.0 billion (the Old Credit Facility as amended, the “Ryerson Credit Facility”).~~ On September 23, 2019, a third amendment was entered to add a U.S. “first-in, last-out” subfacility of $67.9 million (the “FILO Facility”). The maturity date of the FILO Facility is June 30, 2020. The aggregate facility size of $1.0 billion remains unchanged.

~~At September 30, 2019, Ryerson had $440.6 million of outstanding borrowings, $12 million of letters of credit issued and $395 million available under~~ the Ryerson Credit Facility compared to $535.9 million of outstanding borrowings, $12 million of letters of credit issued, and $392 million available at December 31, 2018. Total credit availability is limited by the amount of eligible accounts receivable, inventory, and qualified cash pledged as collateral under the agreement insofar as Ryerson is subject to a borrowing base comprised of the aggregate of these three amounts, less applicable reserves. Eligible accounts receivable, at any date of determination, is comprised of the aggregate value of all accounts directly created by a borrower (and in the case of Canadian accounts, the Canadian borrower) in the ordinary course of business arising out of the sale of goods or the rendering of services, each of which has been invoiced, with such receivables adjusted to exclude various ineligible accounts, including, among other things, those to which a borrower (or guarantor, as applicable) does not have sole and absolute title and accounts arising out of a sale to an employee, officer, director, or affiliate of a borrower (or guarantor, as applicable). Eligible inventory, at any date of determination, is comprised of the net orderly liquidation value of all inventory owned by a borrower (and in the case of Canadian accounts, the Canadian borrower). Qualified cash consists of cash in an eligible deposit account that is subject to customary restrictions and liens in favor of the lenders.

The Ryerson Credit Facility has an allocation of $940 million to the Company’s subsidiaries in the United States and an allocation of $60 million to Ryerson Holding’s Canadian subsidiary that is a borrower. Amounts outstanding under the ~~Ryerson~~ Credit Facility bear interest at (i) a rate determined by reference to (A) the base rate (the highest of the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.50%, Bank of America, N.A.’s prime rate, and the one-month LIBOR rate plus 1.00%) or (B) a LIBOR rate or, (ii) for Ryerson Holding’s Canadian subsidiary that is a borrower, (A) a rate determined by reference to the Canadian base rate (the greatest of the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.50%, Bank of America-Canada Branch’s “base rate” for commercial loans in U.S. Dollars made at its “base rate”, and the 30 day LIBOR rate plus 1.00%), (B) the prime rate (the greater of Bank of America-Canada Branch’s “prime rate” for commercial loans made by it in Canada in Canadian Dollars and the one-month Canadian bankers’ acceptance rate plus 1.00%), or (C) the bankers’ acceptance rate. The spread over the base rate and prime rate is between 0.25% and 0.50% and the spread over the LIBOR for the bankers’ acceptances is between 1.25% and 1.50%, depending on the amount available to be borrowed under the ~~Ryerson~~ Credit Facility. Amounts outstanding under the FILO Facility bear interest at the same rates as listed above for U.S. borrowings, however the spread over the base rate is between 1.25% and 1.50% and the spread over the LIBOR rate is between 2.25% and 2.50%, depending on the amount available to be borrowed under the Ryerson Credit Facility. Ryerson also pays commitment fees on amounts not borrowed at a rate of 0.23%. Overdue amounts and all amounts owed during the existence of a default bear interest at 2% above the rate otherwise applicable thereto. Loans advanced under the FILO Facility may only be prepaid if all then outstanding revolving loans are repaid in full.

We attempt to minimize interest rate risk exposure through the utilization of interest rate swaps, which are derivative financial instruments. In March 2017, we entered into an interest rate swap to fix interest on $150 million of our floating rate debt under the Ryerson Credit Facility at a rate of 1.658% through March 2020. In June 2019, we entered into a second interest rate swap to fix interest on $60 million of our floating rate debt under the Ryerson Credit Facility at a rate of 1.729% through June 2022. Both of the swaps have reset dates and critical terms that match our existing debt and the anticipated critical terms of future debt. The weighted average interest rate on the outstanding borrowings under the Ryerson Credit Facility including the interest rate swap was 3.3% and ~~3.5% at September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively.~~

~~Borrowings under the~~ ~~Ryerson~~ ~~Credit Facility are secured by first-priority liens on all of the inventory, accounts receivables, lockbox accounts, and related assets of the borrowers and the guarantors.~~

~~The~~ ~~Ryerson~~ Credit Facility also contains covenants that, among other things, restrict Ryerson Holding and its restricted subsidiaries with respect to the incurrence of debt, the creation of liens, transactions with affiliates, mergers and consolidations, sales of assets, and acquisitions. The ~~Ryerson~~ ~~Credit Facility also requires that, if availability under the~~ ~~Ryerson~~ Credit Facility declines to a certain level, Ryerson maintain a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio as of the end of each fiscal quarter, and includes defaults upon (among other things) the occurrence of a change of control of Ryerson and a cross-default to other financing arrangements.

~~The~~ ~~Ryerson~~ Credit Facility contains events of default with respect to, among other things, default in the payment of principal when due or the payment of interest, fees, and other amounts due thereunder after a specified grace period, material misrepresentations, failure to perform certain specified covenants, certain bankruptcy events, the invalidity of certain security agreements or guarantees, material judgments, and the occurrence of a change of control of Ryerson. If such an event of default occurs, the lenders under the ~~Ryerson~~ ~~Credit Facility will be entitled to various remedies, including acceleration of amounts outstanding under the~~ ~~Ryerson~~ ~~Credit Facility and all other actions permitted to be taken by secured creditors.~~

~~The lenders under the~~ ~~Ryerson~~ Credit Facility could reject a borrowing request if any event, circumstance, or development has occurred that has had or could reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on the Company. If Ryerson Holding, JT Ryerson, any of the other borrowers, or any restricted subsidiaries of JT Ryerson becomes insolvent or commences bankruptcy proceedings, all amounts borrowed under the ~~Ryerson~~ ~~Credit Facility will become immediately due and payable.~~

~~Net proceeds of short-term borrowings that are reflected in the Condensed~~ Consolidated ~~Statements of Cash Flows represent borrowings under the~~ ~~Ryerson~~Financial Statements. ~~Credit Facility with original maturities less than three months.~~

On May 24, 2016, JT Ryerson issued $650 million in aggregate principal amount of the 2022 Notes. The 2022 Notes bear interest at a rate of 11.00% per annum. The 2022 Notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a senior secured basis by all of our existing and future domestic subsidiaries that are co-borrowers or that have guarantee obligations under the Ryerson Credit Facility.

~~During 2018, a principal amount of $50.5 million of the 2022 Notes were repurchased for $52.2 million and~~ ~~retired. During the first~~ ~~nine~~ ~~months of 2019, a principal amount of $11.6 million of the 2022 Notes were repurchased for $11.8 million and retired, resulting in the recognition of a $0.2 million loss within other income and~~ ~~(expense), net on the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income.~~

At September 30, 2019, Ryerson China’s foreign borrowings were $7.5 million, which were owed to banks in Asia at a weighted average interest rate of 4.1% per annum and secured by inventory and property, plant, and equipment. At December 31,

~~2018, Ryerson China’s foreign borrowings~~ ~~were $19.5 million, which were owed to banks in Asia at a weighted average interest~~ ~~rate of 4.3%~~ ~~per annum and secured by inventory and property, plant, and equipment.~~

Availability under the foreign credit lines was $38 million and $26 million at September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively. Letters of credit issued by our foreign subsidiaries were $4 million at September 30, 2019 and $3 million at December 31, 2018, respectively.

At December 31, ~~2018,~~2019, pension liabilities exceeded plan assets by ~~$181~~$140 million. Through the three months ended March 31, 2020, we have made $7 million in pension contributions. The Company has elected to defer the remaining expected 2020 U.S. contributions of $13 million until December 31, 2020, as permitted under The CARES Act that was passed in March 2020. We anticipate that we will have ~~a total~~zero minimum required pension ~~contribution of approximately~~contributions ~~$26 million~~ in ~~2019~~2020 under ~~the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”) and Pension Protection Act in the U.S and~~ the Ontario Pension Benefits Act in Canada. ~~Through the nine months ended September 30, 2019, we have~~ ~~made $21 million~~ ~~in pension contributions and anticipate an additional $5 million of contributions in the remaining three months of 2019.~~ Future contribution requirements depend on the investment returns on plan assets, the impact of discount rates on pension liabilities, and changes in regulatory requirements. We are unable to determine the amount or timing of any such contributions required by ERISA or whether any such contributions would have a material adverse effect on our financial position or cash flows. We

COVID-19 has negatively affected the financial markets and our returns on pension assets. Changes in returns on plan assets may affect our plan funding, cash flows, and financial condition. Differences between actual plan asset return and the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets (5.75% for the Ryerson Pension Plans, 3.20% for CS&W Pension Plan, and between 3.00% and 4.75% for the Canadian Plans as of December 31, 2019) impact the measurement of the following year’s pension expense and pension funding requirements. However, we believe that cash flow from operations and the Ryerson Credit Facility described above will provide sufficient funds to make the minimum required ~~contribution~~contributions in ~~2019.~~2020.

In the normal course of business with customers, vendors, and others, we have entered into off-balance sheet arrangements, such as letters of credit, which totaled ~~$16~~$15 million as of ~~September 30, 2019.~~March 31, 2020. We do not have any other material off-balance sheet financing arrangements. None of these off-balance sheet arrangements are likely to have a material effect on our current or future financial condition, results of operations, liquidity, or capital resources.

The following table presents contractual obligations at ~~September 30, 2019:~~March 31, 2020:

	Payments Due by Period										Payments Due by Period
Contractual Obligations ^{(1) (2)}	Total		Less than 1 year		1 – 3 years		4 – 5 years		After 5 years		Total		Less than 1 year		1 – 3 years		4 – 5 years		After 5 years
	(In millions)										(In millions)

2022 Notes		588		—		588		—		—		533		—		533		—		—
Ryerson Credit Facility		441		58		383		—		—		546		17		529		—		—
Foreign Debt		8		8		—		—		—		13		13		—		—		—
Other Debt		9		1		3		5		—		9		1		4		4		—
Interest on 2022 Notes, Foreign Debt, Other Debt and Ryerson Credit Facility ⁽³⁾		200		80		120		—		—
Interest on 2022 Notes, Foreign Debt, Other Debt, and Ryerson Credit Facility ⁽³⁾												147		72		75		—		—
Purchase Obligations ⁽⁴⁾		18		18		—		—		—		16		16		—		—		—
Operating Leases ⁽⁵⁾		96		21		35		23		17		145		25		42		31		47
Pension Withdrawal Liability		1		—		—		—		1		1		—		—		—		1
Finance Lease Obligations ⁽⁵⁾		37		15		16		6		—		32		13		13		6		—
Total	$	1,398	$	201	$	1,145	$	34	$	18	$	1,442	$	157	$	1,196	$	41	$	48

In accordance with ASC 740, “Income Taxes,” the Company calculates its quarterly tax provision based on an estimated effective tax rate for the year, applies it to the results of each interim period and then adjusts that amount by certain discrete items. Due to volatile macro-economic conditions associated with the COVID-19 pandemic, we may experience fluctuations in our forecasted earnings before income taxes as a result of events which cannot be predicted. As such, the Company's effective tax rate could be subject to unusual volatility as forecasted earnings before income taxes change.

We maintain a valuation allowance on certain foreign and U.S. federal and state deferred tax assets until such time as in management’s judgment, considering all available positive and negative evidence and consistent with its past determinations, we determine that these deferred tax assets are more likely than not realizable.

We anticipate that certain statutes of limitation will close within the next twelve months resulting in the reduction of the reserve for uncertain tax benefits related to various intercompany transactions. However, we do not believe the amount will be material.

Our primary areas of market risk include changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, and commodity prices.We continually monitor these risks and develop strategies to manage them.

~~We are exposed to market risk related to our fixed-rate and variable-rate long-term debt.~~ Market risk is the potential loss arising from adverse changes in market rates and prices, such as interest rates. We are exposed to market risk related to our fixed-rate and variable-rate long-term debt. Changes in interest rates may affect the market value of our fixed-rate debt. The estimated fair value of our long-term debt and the current portions thereof using quoted market prices ~~for our~~of Company debt securities recently traded and market-based prices of similar securities for those securities not recently traded was $~~1,073.9~~1,058.8 million at ~~September 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 and ~~$1,158.5~~$1,014.4 million at December 31, ~~2018~~2019 as compared with the carrying value of ~~$1,038.6~~$1,096.1 million and ~~$1,153.3~~$981.8 million at ~~September 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 and December 31, ~~2018,~~2019, respectively. We manage interest rate risk in our capital structure by holding a combination of variable and fixed-rate debt. At March 31, 2020, 51% of our debt was valued with variable interest rates and the remaining 49% was at fixed interest rates.

AWe use interest rate swaps to manage our exposure to interest rate changes. As of March 31, 2020, we have 2 receive variable, pay fixed, interest rate swaps to manage the exposure to variable interest rates of the Ryerson Credit Facility. In June 2019, we entered into a forward agreement for $60 million of “pay fixed” interest at 1.729% and in November 2019, we entered into a forward agreement for $100 million of “pay fixed” interest at 1.539%. We account for these interest rate swaps as cash flow hedges of floating-rate borrowings with changes in fair value being recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income. The fair value of the interest rate swaps as of March 31, 2020 was a net liability of $4.9 million. After considering the effects of our interest rate swaps, 64% of our debt was at fixed interest rates as of March 31, 2020. Considering the impact of interest rate swaps, a hypothetical 1% increase in interest rates on variable rate debt would have increased interest expense for the first ~~nine~~three months of ~~2019~~2020 by approximately ~~$2.9~~$0.7 million.

We are subject to ~~exposure from fluctuations~~foreign currency risks primarily through our operations in ~~foreign currencies. We~~Canada, Mexico, and China and we use foreign currency exchange contracts to ~~hedge~~reduce our ~~variability in cash flows when a payment~~exposure to currency ~~is different from our functional currency. Our foreign~~price fluctuations. Foreign currency contracts are principally used to purchase U.S. dollars. We had foreign currency contracts with a U.S. dollar notional amount of $~~2.2~~2.8 million outstanding at ~~September 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 and net asset value of ~~zero.~~$0.2 million. We do not currently account for these contracts as hedges but rather mark these contracts to market with a corresponding offset to current earnings. For the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2019,~~March 31, 2020, the Company recognized a ~~loss~~gain of ~~$0.1~~$0.2 million associated with its foreign currency contracts. A hypothetical strengthening or weakening of 10% in the foreign exchange rates underlying the foreign currency contracts from the market rate as of ~~September 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 would increase or decrease the fair value of the foreign currency contracts by $0.2 ~~million.~~million and $0.3 million, respectively.

The currency effects of translating the financial statements of our foreign subsidiaries are included in accumulated other comprehensive loss and will not be recognized in the statement of operations until there is a liquidation or sale of those foreign subsidiaries.

In general, we purchase metals in an effort to maintain our inventory at levels that we believe to be appropriate to satisfy the anticipated needs of our customers based upon historic buying practices, customer contracts, and market conditions. Our commitments to purchase metals are generally at prevailing market prices in effect at the time we place our orders.

Metal prices can fluctuate significantly due to several factors including changes in foreign and domestic production capacity, raw material availability, metals consumption, and foreign currency rates. ~~Declining metal prices could reduce our revenues, gross profit, and net income. From time~~Derivative financial instruments have been used to ~~time, we may enter into fixed price sales contracts with our customers for certain~~manage a limited portion of our ~~inventory~~ ~~components. We may enter into metal commodity futures and options contracts~~exposure to ~~reduce volatility~~fluctuations in the ~~price~~cost of ~~these metals.~~certain commodities. No derivatives are held for trading purposes.

As of ~~September 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020, we had ~~600,000~~240,000 tons of iron ore swap contracts with a net liability value of ~~$8.4~~$2.6 million, ~~2,347 tons of nickel swap contracts with a net liability value of $1.8 million, 22,112 tons~~ ~~of aluminum swap contracts with a net liability value of $1.6 million,~~ ~~26,998~~30,553 tons of hot roll coil swaps contracts with a net liability value of ~~$0.5~~$0.1 million ~~and 133,000 barrels~~, 14,915 tons of ~~crude oil~~aluminum swap contracts with a net ~~asset~~liability value of ~~$0.5~~$3.7 million, and 338 tons of nickel swap contracts with a net liability value of $0.8 million. We do not currently account for these swaps as hedges, but rather mark these contracts to market with a corresponding offset to current earnings. ~~As of~~ ~~September 30, 2019,~~ ~~we offset~~For the ~~fair value of~~three months ended March 31, 2020, the ~~metal commodity and crude oil derivatives with related cash collateral of $4.3 million. We~~Company recognized a loss of ~~$12.2~~$2.0 million ~~in the nine months ended September 30, 2019 related to~~associated with its commodity ~~contracts.~~derivatives.

A hypothetical strengthening or weakening of 10% in the commodity prices underlying the commodity derivative contracts from the market rate as of ~~September 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 would increase or decrease the fair value of commodity derivative contracts by ~~$1.1~~$2.7 million.

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and ~~Chief~~Interim Principal Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.

As required by SEC Rule 15d-15(b), we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and ~~Chief~~Interim Principal Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on the evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and ~~Chief~~Interim Principal Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of ~~September 30, 2019.~~March 31, 2020.

There have been no changes in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect the Company’s controls over financial reporting during the quarter ended ~~September 30, 2019.~~March 31, 2020.

The EPA indicated in a January 2, 2020 “progress update” letter that it is negotiating with certain parties to perform remedial design work at five unspecified areas which comprise 52% of the overall acreage subject to remediation. In late March, the EPA issued a Unilateral Administrative Order for Remedial Design to Schnitzer Steel, ordering it to develop a remedial design plan for the river area which includes the area where our former facilities were. In the meantime, Schnitzer has filed a petition for relief from the remedy required by the ROD.

The EPA has stated that it is willing to consider de minimis ~~and de micromis~~ settlements, which JT Ryerson is trying to pursue; however, the EPA has not begun meeting with anyof the smaller partieswho have requested de minimis or de micromis status, stating that it does not have sufficient information to determine ~~if anyone meets the de minimis~~whether any parties meet such criteria and does not intend to begin those considerations until after the ~~Remedial Design~~remedial design work is completed.It has met with selected parties that we believe to be larger ~~targets;~~targets. JT Ryerson has not been ~~included in that group.~~invited to meet with the EPA. As a result of the ongoing negotiations and filings over the ROD and the EPA’s decision not to meet with smaller parties, we cannot determine how allocations will be made and whether a de minimus settlement can be reached with the EPA.

Except for the risk factors below, there have been no material changes relating to this Item from those set forth in Item 1A on the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2018.~~2019.

~~Global metal overcapacity~~The effects of the COVID-19 pandemic have had, and ~~imports~~are expected to continue to have, an adverse impact on our business, operating results, and financial condition.

The global outbreak of ~~metal products into~~a novel strain of coronavirus (“COVID-19”) was declared a pandemic by the ~~United States have adversely~~World Health Organization and a national emergency by the U.S. government in March 2020 and has negatively affected the U.S. and ~~may again adversely~~

~~affect, United States metal prices, which could impact our sales~~global economies, disrupted global supply chains, resulted in significant travel and ~~results of operations.~~

Global metal production capacity currently exceeds global consumption of metal products. Such excess capacity sometimes results in metal manufacturers in certain countries exporting steel at prices that are lower than prevailing domestic pricestransport restrictions, mandated closures and ~~sometimes at or below their cost of production. Excessive imports of metal into the United States, such as in recent years, have exerted~~stay-at-home orders, and ~~may exert~~created significant disruptions in the ~~future, downward pressure on United States steel prices which may negatively affect our results of operations.~~

~~The U.S. government has enacted several trade actions in 2018 and 2019 including tariffs on imported steel and aluminum products under Section 232~~financial markets. We are monitoring the impact of the ~~Trade Expansion Act. It is expected that these trade~~COVID-19 pandemic across our business. The global spread of COVID-19, and the various governmental, industry, and consumer actions while in effect, will limit metal imports from nonexempt countries. If these trade actions are relaxed, repealed, or if relatively higher U.S. metal prices make it attractive for foreign metal producersrelated thereto, have had and could continue to ~~export their products to the U.S., despite the presence of duties or tariffs, the resurgence of substantial imports of foreign steel could create downward pressure~~have negative impacts on ~~U.S. metal prices which could have a material adverse effect on sales prices~~our business and future results of operations. To the extent these tariffs and other trade actions result in a decrease in international demand for steel and aluminum, or products manufactured therefrom and, produced in the United States, or otherwise negatively impactoperations, including softening demand for our products, disruptions in our supply chain and operations, and related restrictions on our employees, including quarantines, stay-at-home orders, and restrictions on travel.

In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, we have implemented several policies and procedures to protect the health and welfare of our employees first and foremost, while operating as an essential business, and maintaining our liquidity. We have communicated and enforced social distancing practices by implementing work from home arrangements, alternating employee shifts, eliminating congregation, and suspending non-essential travel. COVID-19 has disrupted our internal operations, including by heightening the risk that our employees will suffer illness or otherwise not be permitted to work and exposing us to cybersecurity and other risks associated with a large number of our employees working remotely. Certain of our facilities have experienced temporary work disruptions as a result of COVID-19, and we cannot predict whether these will continue or if our facilities will experience more significant or frequent disruptions in the future. Furthermore, we have and may need to further reduce our workforce as a result of declines in our business ~~may~~caused by COVID-19, and any such reduction would cause us to incur costs. Moreover, there can be no assurance that we would be able to rehire our workforce in the event our business experiences a subsequent recovery.

On the whole, because manufacturing demand is tied closely to overall economic strength, economic uncertainty and/or increased unemployment that results from the COVID-19 pandemic or measures undertaken in response has led and could continue to lead to lower demand for our products. Although our end-markets are diverse, concerns regarding and measures implemented in response to the COVID-19 pandemic have and could further negatively influence overall demand, particularly for the consumer durable sector, resulting in cancellations or deferrals of orders and/or decreases in new deliveries. Due to COVID-19, we are also expecting continued and exacerbated weakness in the oil & gas sector resulting from extremely low energy prices driven by over-supply, and in the commercial ground transportation sector, from the expected reduction of class 8 truck orders.

COVID-19 has also led to disruption and volatility in the capital markets, which depending on future developments could adversely ~~impacted.~~impact our capital resources and liquidity in the future. The COVID-19 pandemic has also negatively affected financialmarkets and our returns on our pension assets which could adversely impact our plan funding, cash flows, and pension expense.

We are also monitoring the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on the fair value of our assets. While we do not currently anticipate any material impairments on our assets as a result of COVID-19, future changes in expectations for sales, earnings, and cash flows related to intangible assets and goodwill below our current projections could cause these assets to be impaired.

We are continuing to monitor the impact across our business of the COVID-19 pandemic and will take appropriate actions in an effort to mitigate adverse consequences. The full extent to which the COVID-19 pandemic and measures taken in response thereto adversely impacts our business, financial condition, and results of operations will depend on numerous evolving factors and future developments, which are highly uncertain, rapidly changing, and cannot be predicted, including: the duration and scope of the outbreak; governmental, business, and individual actions that have been and continue to be taken in response to the outbreak, including travel restrictions, quarantines, social distancing, work-at-home and stay-at-home orders; the impact of the outbreak on the financial markets and economic activity generally; the effect of the outbreak on our customers, suppliers, and other business partners; our ability to access usual sources of liquidity on reasonable terms; and our ability to comply with the financial covenants in our Credit Agreement if a material economic downturn results in increased indebtedness or substantially lower EBITDA. All of the foregoing will likely impact our business, financial condition, results of operations, and forward-looking expectations. In addition, the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic may also have the effect of heightening many of the other risks described in Item 1A “Risk Factors” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019.

The right to receive payment on the 2022 Notes and the guarantees will be subordinated to the liabilities of non-guarantor subsidiaries.

The notes and related guarantees are structurally subordinated to all indebtedness of our subsidiaries that are not guarantors of the 2022 Senior Secured Notes (the “2022 Notes”). While the indenture governing the 2022 Notes limits the indebtedness and activities of these non-guarantor subsidiaries, holders of indebtedness of, and trade creditors of, non-guarantor subsidiaries, including lenders under bank financing agreements, are entitled to payments of their claims from the assets of such subsidiaries before those assets are made available for distribution to any guarantor, as direct or indirect shareholder. While the non-guarantor subsidiaries have agreed under the indenture not to pledge or encumber their assets (other than with respect to permitted liens) without equally and ratably securing the notes, they will not guarantee the 2022 Notes notwithstanding any such pledge or encumbrance in favor of the 2022 Notes.

The non-guarantor subsidiaries represented, respectively, ~~9.2%~~9.6% and ~~5.9%~~9.2% of our net sales and EBITDA for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2019.~~March 31, 2020. In addition, these non-guarantor subsidiaries represented respectively, ~~10.2 %~~9.9% and ~~7.6%~~7.1% of our assets and liabilities, as of ~~September 30, 2019.~~March 31, 2020.

Accordingly, in the event that any of the non-guarantor subsidiaries or joint venture entities become insolvent, liquidates, or otherwise reorganizes:

Changes in the method of determining the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”), or the replacement of LIBOR with an alternative reference rate, may adversely affect interest rates on our outstanding variable rate indebtedness.

Certain of our variable rate debt, including the Ryerson Credit Facility, currently uses LIBOR as a benchmark for establishing certain interest rates. LIBOR is the subject of recent proposals for reform and on July 27, 2017, the U.K. Financial Conduct Authority announced that it intends to stop compelling banks to submit rates for the calculation of LIBOR after 2021. The Federal Reserve Bank of New York has begun publishing a Secured Overnight Funding Rate (“SOFR”), which is intended to replace U.S. dollar LIBOR, and central banks in several other jurisdictions have also announced plans for alternative reference rates for other currencies. These reforms may cause LIBOR to perform differently than in the past or to disappear entirely. The consequences of these developments with respect to LIBOR cannot be entirely predicted but may result in an increase in the interest cost of our variable rate indebtedness. In the future, we may need to renegotiate our outstanding indebtedness or incur other indebtedness, and the phase-out of LIBOR may negatively impact the terms of such indebtedness. In addition, the overall financial market may be disrupted as a result of the phase-out or replacement of LIBOR. Disruption in the financial market could have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations, and liquidity.

*In accordance with SEC Release 33-8238, Exhibits 32.1 and 32.2 are being furnished herewith and not filed.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Company has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


Title of each class	Trading symbol(s)	Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, $0.01 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized	RYI	New York Stock Exchange

			PAGE NO.
Part I. Financial Information:

	Item 1.	Financial Statements:

		Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Unaudited)—Three ~~and Nine~~ Months Ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2020 and 2019 ~~and 2018~~	3

		Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)—~~Nine~~Three Months Ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2020 and 2019 ~~and 2018~~	4

		Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets—~~September 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 (Unaudited) and December 31, ~~2018~~2019	5

		Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)	6

	Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	2523

	Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	3532

	Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	3533

Part II. Other Information:

	Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	3633

	Item 1A.	Risk Factors	3634

	Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	3735

	Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	3735

	Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	3735

	Item 5.	Other Information	3735

	Item 6.	Exhibits	3836

Signature			3937

	~~September 30,~~
~~Lease Term and Discount Rate~~	~~2019~~

~~Weighted-average remaining lease term (years)~~
~~Operating leases~~		~~5.6~~
~~Finance leases~~		~~2.8~~
~~Weighted-average discount rate~~
~~Operating leases~~		~~3.8~~	%
~~Finance leases~~		~~4.8~~	%

	At July 2,
	2018
	(In millions)
Cash and cash equivalents	$	10.0
Receivables, less provisions		80.0
Inventories		179.8
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		1.7
Property, plant, and equipment		66.5
Other intangible assets		16.1
Total identifiable assets acquired		354.1
Accounts payable		(49.7	)
Salaries, wages, and commissions		(4.9	)
Other accrued liabilities		(6.5	)
Deferred income taxes		(27.7	)
Deferred employee benefits		(31.8	)
Total liabilities assumed		(120.6	)
Net identifiable assets acquired		233.5
Bargain purchase gain		(70.0	)
Total purchase price	$	163.5


Large accelerated filer	☐	Accelerated filer	☒	Emerging growth company	☐

Non-accelerated filer	☐	Smaller reporting company	☐

Maturity of Lease Liabilities	Operating Leases^(a)			Finance Leases			Operating Leases^(a)			Finance Leases
	(In millions)						(In millions)
2019	$	5.5		$	4.2
2020		20.3			13.4		$	18.9		$	10.2
2021		18.4			8.6			23.5			9.1
2022		14.8			5.2			19.8			5.7
2023		11.6			2.9			16.5			3.3
After 2023		24.9			2.3
2024								15.4			2.8
After 2024								51.1			0.5
Total lease payments		95.5			36.6			145.2			31.6
Less: Interest^(b)		(9.6	)		(2.7	)		(17.8	)		(2.1	)
Present value of lease liabilities^(c)	$	85.9		$	33.9		$	127.4		$	29.5

	March 31,			December 31,
Lease Term and Discount Rate	2020			2019

Weighted-average remaining lease term (years)
Operating leases		7.7			7.9
Finance leases		2.9			2.8
Weighted-average discount rate
Operating leases		3.5	%		3.6	%
Finance leases		4.6	%		4.8	%

	Pro Forma
	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2019		2018		2019		2018
	(In millions)
Net sales	$	1,104.4	$	1,250.0	$	3,540.1	$	3,607.7
Net income attributable to Ryerson Holding Corporation		10.1		4.3		56.0		13.7

	Three Months Ended September 30,
	Pension Benefits						Other Benefits
	2019			2018			2019			2018
	(In millions)
Components of net periodic benefit (credit) cost
Service cost	$	1		$	1		$	—		$	—
Interest cost		7			7			1			1
Expected return on assets		(9	)		(10	)		—			—
Recognized actuarial (gain) loss		4			4			(2	)		(2	)
Amortization of prior service credit		—			—			(1	)		(1	)
Net periodic benefit (credit) cost	$	3		$	2		$	(2	)	$	(2	)

		Amount of Gain/(Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivatives													Amount of Gain/(Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivatives
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments	Location of Gain/(Loss) Recognized in Income	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,						Location of Gain/(Loss) Recognized in Income	Three Months Ended March 31,
under ASC 815	on Derivatives	2019			2018			2019			2018			on Derivatives	2020			2019
Metal commodity contracts	Cost of materials sold	$	(4.9	)	$	(1.4	)	$	(12.9	)	$	(0.1	)	Cost of materials sold	$	(2.0	)	$	1.6
Crude oil contracts	Warehousing, delivery, selling, general, and administrative		—			—			0.7			—
Crude oil commodity contracts														Warehousing, delivery, selling, general, and administrative		—			0.9
Foreign exchange contracts	Other income and (expense), net		—			(0.1	)		(0.1	)		—		Other income and (expense), net		0.2			(0.1	)
Total		$	(4.9	)	$	(1.5	)	$	(12.3	)	$	(0.1	)		$	(1.8	)	$	2.4

		Amount of Gain/(Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income into Income									Amount of Gain/(Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income into Income
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments	Location of Gain/(Loss) Recognized in Income	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,				Location of Gain/(Loss) Recognized in Income	Three Months Ended March 31,
under ASC 815	on Derivatives	2019		2018		2019		2018		on Derivatives	2020			2019
		(In millions)									(In millions)
Interest rate swaps	Interest and other expense on debt	$	0.3	$	0.1	$	0.9	$	0.2	Interest and other expense on debt	$	(0.1	)	$	0.3

	Changes in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) by Component, net of tax									Changes in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) by Component, net of tax
	Foreign Currency Translation			Benefit Plan Liabilities			Cash Flow Hedge - Interest Rate Swap			Foreign Currency Translation			Benefit Plan Liabilities			Cash Flow Hedge - Interest Rate Swap
	(In millions)									(In millions)
Balance at January 1, 2019	$	(52.8	)	$	(264.0	)	$	1.0
Balance at January 1, 2020										$	(48.6	)	$	(253.1	)	$	(0.3	)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications		2.2			—			(0.7	)		(8.5	)		—			(3.6	)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income into net income		0.2			2.5			(0.7	)		—			1.8			0.1
Net current-period other comprehensive income (loss)		2.4			2.5			(1.4	)		(8.5	)		1.8			(3.5	)
Balance at September 30, 2019	$	(50.4	)	$	(261.5	)	$	(0.4	)
Balance at March 31, 2020										$	(57.1	)	$	(251.3	)	$	(3.8	)

	Contract Assets			Contract Liabilities			Contract Assets			Contract Liabilities
	(In millions)						(In millions)
Beginning Balance at January 1, 2019	$	16.6		$	10.0
Satisfied contract liability from beginning of the period		—			(7.1	)
Beginning Balance at January 1, 2020							$	13.5		$	10.5
Contract liability satisfied during the period								—			(4.1	)
Contract liability incurred during the period		—			5.5			—			3.3
Net change in contract assets and liabilities for products with no alternative use during the period		(1.2	)		—			(0.5	)		—
Changes to reserves		(1.7	)		0.9			0.5			(0.6	)
Ending Balance at September 30, 2019	$	13.7		$	9.3
Ending Balance at March 31, 2020							$	13.5		$	9.1

	Changes in Provision for Expected Credit Losses
	(In millions)
Balance at January 1, 2020	$	3.5
Current period provision		0.6
Write-offs charged against allowance		(0.5	)
Effect of foreign exchange rates		(0.1	)
Balance at March 31, 2020	$	3.5

	Three Months Ended March 31,
Product Line	2020			2019
Carbon Steel Flat		25	%		25	%
Carbon Steel Plate		10			12
Carbon Steel Long		16			16
Stainless Steel Flat		16			15
Stainless Steel Plate		5			4
Stainless Steel Long		5			4
Aluminum Flat		14			15
Aluminum Plate		3			2
Aluminum Long		5			5
Other		1			2
Total		100	%		100	%

	September 30,				Cost			Percentage
	2019		2018		change			change
Average cost of materials sold per ton sold (three-months ended)	$	1,505	$	1,675	$	(170	)		(10.1	)%
Average cost of materials sold per ton sold (nine-months ended)	$	1,572	$	1,591	$	(19	)		(1.2	)%


Exhibit No.	Description
~~10.1~~	~~Amendment No. 3, dated as of September 23, 2019 to Credit Agreement dated as of July 24, 2015, among Ryerson Holding Corporation,Joseph T. Ryerson & Son, Inc., Wilcox-Turret Cold Drawn, Inc., Ryerson Procurement Corporation, Southern Tool Steel, LLC,~~Ryerson Canada, Inc., and each of the other borrowers and guarantors, the lenders party thereto, and Bank of America, N.A., as the administrative agent and collateral agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Ryerson Holding Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 27, 2019).
31.1	Certificate of the Principal Executive Officer of the Company, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2	Certificate of the Interim Principal Financial Officer of the Company, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1*	Written Statement of Edward J. Lehner, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2*	Written Statement of ~~Erich S. Schnaufer,~~Molly D. Kannan, Interim Principal Financial Officer, Chief ~~Financial~~Accounting Officer and Controller of the Company pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

101.INS	Inline XBRL Instance Document – the instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document.

101.SCH	Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

101.DEF	Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

101.CAL	Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

101.LAB	Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document

101.PRE	Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document


104	Cover Page Interactive Data File (embedded within the Inline XBRL document)


RYERSON HOLDING CORPORATION

By:		/s/ ~~Erich S. Schnaufer~~Molly D. Kannan
		~~Erich S. Schnaufer~~Molly D. Kannan Interim Principal Financial Officer, Chief ~~Financial~~Accounting Officer and Controller (duly authorized signatory ~~and principal financial officer~~ of the registrant)