(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☑ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ☑ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☑

As of ~~May 1,~~October 23, 2020, there were ~~67,058,155~~67,218,836 shares of Wesbanco, Inc. common stock, $2.0833 par value, outstanding.


Item No.	ITEM	Page No.	ITEM	Page No.

	PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION		PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
1	Financial Statements	2	Financial Statements	2
	Consolidated Balance Sheets at March 31, 2020 (unaudited) and December 31, 2019	2	Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 30, 2020 (unaudited) and December 31, 2019	2
	Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019 (unaudited)	3	Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019 (unaudited)	3
	Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity for the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019 (unaudited)	4	Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019 (unaudited)	4
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019 (unaudited)	5	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019 (unaudited)	6
	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)	6	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)	7

2	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	35	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	37

3	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	57	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	61

4	Controls and Procedures	59	Controls and Procedures	63

	PART II – OTHER INFORMATION		PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
1	Legal Proceedings	60	Legal Proceedings	64

1A	Risk Factors	60	Risk Factors	64

2	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	61	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	65

6	Exhibits	62	Exhibits	66

	Signatures	63	Signatures	67

	March 31,			December 31,			September 30,			December 31,
(unaudited, in thousands, except shares)	2020			2019			2020			2019
ASSETS
Cash and due from banks, including interest bearing amounts of $410,734 and $51,891, respectively	$	593,872		$	234,796
Cash and due from banks, including interest bearing amounts of $544,284 and $51,891, respectively							$	760,266		$	234,796
Securities:
Equity securities, at fair value		11,230			12,343			12,516			12,343
Available-for-sale debt securities, at fair value		2,262,082			2,393,558			2,045,924			2,393,558
Held-to-maturity debt securities (fair values of $841,120 and $874,523, respectively)		814,414			851,753
Held-to-maturity debt securities (fair values of $782,401 and $874,523, respectively)								746,767			851,753
Allowance for credit losses, held-to-maturity debt securities		(236	)		—			(461	)		—
Net held-to-maturity debt securities		814,178			851,753			746,306			851,753
Total securities		3,087,490			3,257,654			2,804,746			3,257,654
Loans held for sale		48,021			43,013			134,151			43,013
Portfolio loans, net of unearned income		10,349,596			10,267,985			10,989,546			10,267,985
Allowance for credit losses - loans		(114,272	)		(52,429	)		(185,109	)		(52,429	)
Net portfolio loans		10,235,324			10,215,556			10,804,437			10,215,556
Premises and equipment, net		258,200			261,014			248,491			261,014
Accrued interest receivable		43,960			43,648			65,023			43,648
Goodwill and other intangible assets, net		1,170,070			1,149,153			1,165,566			1,149,153
Bank-owned life insurance		301,270			299,516			304,288			299,516
Other assets		257,365			215,762			265,172			215,762
Total Assets	$	15,995,572		$	15,720,112		$	16,552,140		$	15,720,112
LIABILITIES
Deposits:
Non-interest bearing demand	$	3,191,713		$	3,178,270		$	4,073,305		$	3,178,270
Interest bearing demand		2,388,406			2,316,855			2,633,601			2,316,855
Money market		1,539,835			1,518,314			1,619,410			1,518,314
Savings deposits		1,984,057			1,934,647			2,167,597			1,934,647
Certificates of deposit		1,939,321			2,055,920			1,707,512			2,055,920
Total deposits		11,043,332			11,004,006			12,201,425			11,004,006
Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings		1,585,608			1,415,615			794,621			1,415,615
Other short-term borrowings		333,966			282,362			381,909			282,362
Subordinated debt and junior subordinated debt		192,008			199,869			192,150			199,869
Total borrowings		2,111,582			1,897,846			1,368,680			1,897,846
Accrued interest payable		7,667			8,077			5,014			8,077
Other liabilities		246,931			216,262			244,055			216,262
Total Liabilities		13,409,512			13,126,191			13,819,174			13,126,191
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Preferred stock, no par value; 1,000,000 shares authorized; NaN outstanding		—			—
Common stock, $2.0833 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized in 2020 and 2019, respectively; 68,078,116 and 68,078,116 shares issued, respectively; 67,058,155 and 67,824,428 shares outstanding, respectively		141,827			141,827
Preferred stock, no par value, 1,000,000 shares authorized in 2020 and 2019, respectively; 150,000 shares 6.75% non-cumulative perpetual preferred stock, Series A, liquidation preference $150,000,000, issued and outstanding at September 30, 2020 and 0 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2019, respectively								144,529			—
Common stock, $2.0833 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized in 2020 and 2019, respectively; 68,081,306 and 68,078,116 shares issued, respectively; 67,216,012 and 67,824,428 shares outstanding, respectively								141,834			141,827
Capital surplus		1,638,122			1,636,966			1,634,172			1,636,966
Retained earnings		800,064			824,694			802,892			824,694
Treasury stock (1,019,961 and 253,688 shares - at cost, respectively)		(33,714	)		(9,463	)
Treasury stock (865,294 and 253,688 shares - at cost, respectively)								(27,403	)		(9,463	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income		41,141			1,201			38,301			1,201
Deferred benefits for directors		(1,380	)		(1,304	)		(1,359	)		(1,304	)
Total Shareholders' Equity		2,586,060			2,593,921			2,732,966			2,593,921
Total Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity	$	15,995,572		$	15,720,112		$	16,552,140		$	15,720,112

	For the Three Months Ended March 31,				For the Three Months Ended September 30,						For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
(unaudited, in thousands, except shares and per share amounts)	2020		2019		2020			2019			2020		2019
INTEREST AND DIVIDEND INCOME
Loans, including fees	$	119,503	$	95,502	$	116,524			95,369		$	351,095	$	287,287
Interest and dividends on securities:
Taxable		16,986		16,733		11,669			15,887			42,702		49,061
Tax-exempt		4,456		5,541		4,182			4,759			12,940		15,443
Total interest and dividends on securities		21,442		22,274		15,851			20,646			55,642		64,504
Other interest income		1,503		1,277		1,282			1,333			4,062		4,153
Total interest and dividend income		142,448		119,053		133,657			117,348			410,799		355,944
INTEREST EXPENSE
Interest bearing demand deposits		3,394		3,946		1,225			4,489			5,970		12,749
Money market deposits		2,352		1,899		707			1,973			3,937		5,881
Savings deposits		923		522		303			861			1,523		2,061
Certificates of deposit		4,054		3,903		3,197			3,830			10,765		11,831
Total interest expense on deposits		10,723		10,270		5,432			11,153			22,195		32,522
Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings		8,232		6,337		5,457			6,645			20,982		19,269
Other short-term borrowings		870		1,556		304			1,353			1,454		4,392
Subordinated debt and junior subordinated debt		2,461		2,529		1,871			2,077			6,400		6,820
Total interest expense		22,286		20,692		13,064			21,228			51,031		63,003
NET INTEREST INCOME		120,162		98,361		120,593			96,120			359,768		292,941
Provision for credit losses		29,821		2,507		16,288			4,121			107,949		9,375
Net interest income after provision for credit losses		90,341		95,854		104,305			91,999			251,819		283,566
NON-INTEREST INCOME
Trust fees		6,952		7,115		6,426			6,425			19,580		19,880
Service charges on deposits		6,617		6,549		5,332			7,056			16,272		19,803
Electronic banking fees		4,254		5,892		4,780			5,253			13,100		18,299
Net securities brokerage revenue		1,679		1,860		1,725			1,765			4,787		5,597
Bank-owned life insurance		1,769		1,319		2,088			1,373			5,609		4,032
Mortgage banking income		1,276		1,056		8,488			2,588			17,295		5,262
Net securities gains		1,491		657		787			235			3,577		3,800
Net gain on other real estate owned and other assets		169		136
Net (loss) gain on other real estate owned and other assets						(19	)		158			84		670
Other income		3,802		3,189		5,005			2,097			15,177		8,535
Total non-interest income		28,009		27,773		34,612			26,950			95,481		85,878
NON-INTEREST EXPENSE
Salaries and wages		38,910		30,940		38,342			32,915			114,025		95,501
Employee benefits		10,373		9,989		10,604			9,726			31,115		29,419
Net occupancy		7,084		5,566		7,092			5,392			20,809		16,343
Equipment		6,039		4,833		6,229			5,273			17,991		14,924
Marketing		1,138		1,243		1,577			1,505			4,282		4,002
FDIC insurance		2,113		1,353		1,948			(1,221	)		6,456		1,287
Amortization of intangible assets		3,374		2,514		3,346			2,446			10,085		7,424
Restructuring and merger-related expense		5,164		3,107		3,608			1,688			9,241		4,876
Other operating expenses		17,138		14,887		17,197			15,544			52,775		45,876
Total non-interest expense		91,333		74,432		89,943			73,268			266,779		219,652
Income before provision for income taxes		27,017		49,195		48,974			45,681			80,521		149,792
Provision for income taxes		3,621		8,858		7,669			8,334			11,332		27,295
NET INCOME	$	23,396	$	40,337
Net income						41,305			37,347			69,189		122,497
Preferred stock dividends						0			0			0		0
Net income available to common shareholders					$	41,305		$	37,347		$	69,189	$	122,497
EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
Basic	$	0.35	$	0.74	$	0.61		$	0.68		$	1.03	$	2.24
Diluted	$	0.35	$	0.74	$	0.61		$	0.68		$	1.03	$	2.24
AVERAGE COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING
Basic		67,486,550		54,598,499		67,214,759			54,695,578			67,268,449		54,641,057
Diluted		67,587,446		54,706,337		67,269,303			54,751,344			67,351,857		54,705,761
DIVIDENDS DECLARED PER COMMON SHARE	$	0.32	$	0.31	$	0.32		$	0.31		$	0.96	$	0.93

COMPREHENSIVE INCOME	$	63,336	$	60,110	$	39,090		$	43,156		$	106,289	$	170,290

	For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2020 and 2019
																	Accumulated
	Preferred		Common Stock														Other			Deferred
(unaudited, in thousands, except	Stock		Shares					Capital			Retained			Treasury			Comprehensive			Benefits for
shares and per share amounts)	Amount		Outstanding			Amount		Surplus			Earnings			Stock			Income (Loss)			Directors			Total
June 30, 2020	$	—		67,211,192		$	141,827	$	1,633,079		$	782,990		$	(27,518	)	$	40,516		$	(1,373	)	$	2,569,521
Net income		—		—			—		—			41,305			—			—			—			41,305
Other comprehensive loss		—		—			—		—			—			—			(2,215	)		—			(2,215	)
Comprehensive income		—		—			—		—			—			—			—			—			39,090
Common dividends declared ($0.32 per share)		—		—			—		—			(21,403	)		—			—			—			(21,403	)
Issuance of preferred stock, net of issuance costs		144,529		—			—		—			—			—			—			—			144,529
Treasury shares acquired		—		(3,209	)		—		—			—			(70	)		—			—			(70	)
Stock options exercised		—		3,190			7		52			—			—			—			—			59
Restricted stock granted		—		4,839			—		(185	)		—			185			—			—			—
Stock compensation expense		—		—			—		1,329			—			—			—			—			1,329
Deferred benefits for directors- net		—		—			—		(103	)		—			—			—			14			(89	)
September 30, 2020	$	144,529		67,216,012		$	141,834	$	1,634,172		$	802,892		$	(27,403	)	$	38,301		$	(1,359	)	$	2,732,966

June 30, 2019	$	—		54,697,199		$	113,952	$	1,168,212		$	788,900		$	(2	)	$	4,113		$	(1,059	)	$	2,074,116
Net income		—		—			—		—			37,347			—			—			—			37,347
Other comprehensive income		—		—			—		—			—			—			5,809			—			5,809
Comprehensive income		—		—			—		—			—			—			—			—			43,156
Common dividends declared ($0.31 per share)		—		—			—		—			(16,915	)		—			—			—			(16,915	)
Treasury shares acquired		—		(6,974	)		—		42			—			(250	)		—			—			(208	)
Stock options exercised		—		—			—		—			—			—			—			—			—
Restricted stock granted		—		1,000			2		(2	)		—			—			—			—			—
Stock compensation expense		—		—			—		1,333			—			—			—			—			1,333
Deferred benefits for directors- net		—		—			—		10			—			—			—			(223	)		(213	)
September 30, 2019	$	—		54,691,225		$	113,954	$	1,169,595		$	809,332		$	(252	)	$	9,922		$	(1,282	)	$	2,101,269
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

	For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2020 and 2019																							For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2020 and 2019
															Accumulated																									Accumulated
	Common Stock														Other			Deferred						Preferred		Common Stock														Other			Deferred
(unaudited, in thousands, except	Shares					Capital			Retained			Treasury			Comprehensive			Benefits for						Stock		Shares					Capital			Retained			Treasury			Comprehensive			Benefits for
shares and per share amounts)	Outstanding			Amount		Surplus			Earnings			Stock			Income (Loss)			Directors			Total			Amount		Outstanding			Amount		Surplus			Earnings			Stock			Income (Loss)			Directors			Total
December 31, 2019		67,824,428		$	141,827	$	1,636,966		$	824,694		$	(9,463	)	$	1,201		$	(1,304	)	$	2,593,921			—		67,824,428		$	141,827	$	1,636,966		$	824,694		$	(9,463	)	$	1,201		$	(1,304	)	$	2,593,921
Net income		—			—		—			23,396			—			—			—			23,396			—		—			—		—			69,189			—			—			—			69,189
Other comprehensive income		—			—		—			—			—			39,940			—			39,940			—		—			—		—			—			—			37,100			—			37,100
Comprehensive income		—			—		—			—			—			—			—			63,336			—		—			—		—			—			—			—			—			106,289
Common dividends declared ($0.32 per share)		—			—		—			(21,435	)		—			—			—			(21,435	)
Common dividends declared ($0.96 per share)																									—		—			—		—			(64,400	)		—			—			—			(64,400	)
Adoption of accounting standard		—			—		—			(26,591	)		—			—			—			(26,591	)		—		—			—		—			(26,591	)		—			—			—			(26,591	)
Issuance of preferred stock, net of issuance costs																									144,529		—			—		—			—			—			—			—			144,529
Treasury shares acquired		(786,012	)		—		—			—			(24,972	)		—			—			(24,972	)		—		(813,108	)		—		118			—			(25,414	)		—			—			(25,296	)
Stock options exercised		19,739			—		(276	)		—			721			—			—			445			—		22,929			7		(224	)		—			721			—			—			504
Restricted stock granted		—			—		—			—			—			—			—			—			—		181,763			—		(6,753	)		—			6,753			—			—			—
Stock compensation expense		—			—		1,370			—			—			—			—			1,370			—		—			—		4,055			—			—			—			—			4,055
Deferred benefits for directors- net		—			—		62			—			—			—			(76	)		(14	)		—		—			—		10			—			—			—			(55	)		(45	)
March 31, 2020		67,058,155		$	141,827	$	1,638,122		$	800,064		$	(33,714	)	$	41,141		$	(1,380	)	$	2,586,060
September 30, 2020																									144,529		67,216,012		$	141,834	$	1,634,172		$	802,892		$	(27,403	)	$	38,301		$	(1,359	)	$	2,732,966

December 31, 2018		54,598,134		$	113,758	$	1,166,701		$	737,581		$	(274	)	$	(37,871	)	$	(1,068	)	$	1,978,827			—		54,598,134		$	113,758	$	1,166,701		$	737,581		$	(274	)	$	(37,871	)	$	(1,068	)	$	1,978,827
Net income		—			—		—			40,337			—			—			—			40,337			—		—			—		—			122,497			—			—			—			122,497
Other comprehensive income		—			—		—			—			—			19,773			—			19,773			—		—			—		—			—			—			47,793			—			47,793
Comprehensive income		—			—		—			—			—			—			—			60,110			—		—			—		—			—			—			—			—			170,290
Common dividends declared ($0.31 per share)		—			—		—			(16,916	)		—			—			—			(16,916	)
Common dividends declared ($0.93 per share)																									—		—			—		—			(50,746	)		—			—			—			(50,746	)
Treasury shares acquired		(7	)		—		—			—			—			—			—			—			—		(26,358	)		—		170			—			(967	)		—			—			(797	)
Stock options exercised		1,000			—		(25	)		—			45			—			—			20			—		6,000			8		12			—			101			—			—			121
Restricted stock granted																									—		113,449			188		(1,076	)		—			888			—			—			—
Stock compensation expense		—			—		1,075			—			—			—			—			1,075			—		—			—		3,772			—			—			—			—			3,772
Deferred benefits for directors- net		—			—		10			—			—			—			13			23			—		—			—		16			—			—			—			(214	)		(198	)
March 31, 2019		54,599,127		$	113,758	$	1,167,761		$	761,002		$	(229	)	$	(18,098	)	$	(1,055	)	$	2,023,139
September 30, 2019																									—		54,691,225		$	113,954	$	1,169,595		$	809,332		$	(252	)	$	9,922		$	(1,282	)	$	2,101,269

	For the Three Months Ended March 31,						For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
(unaudited, in thousands)	2020			2019			2020			2019
NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES	$	32,884		$	51,190		$	20,628		$	148,095
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Net increase in loans held for investment		(131,110	)		(5,287	)		(751,181	)		(84,688	)
Available-for-sale debt securities:
Proceeds from sales		222,668			66,095			226,099			125,239
Proceeds from maturities, prepayments and calls		157,954			79,051			586,711			287,515
Purchases of securities		(197,153	)		(85,096	)		(424,585	)		(384,890	)
Held-to-maturity debt securities:
Proceeds from maturities, prepayments and calls		48,093			20,067			148,840			112,182
Purchases of securities		(11,734	)		(4,308	)		(46,319	)		(15,005	)
Equity securities:
Proceeds from sales		50			590			203			3,567
Proceeds from bank owned life insurance		10			—			832			—
Purchases of premises and equipment – net		(2,925	)		(2,181	)		(5,957	)		(8,342	)
Sale of portfolio loans		28,262			—			37,195			—
Net cash provided by investing activities		114,115			68,931
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities								(228,162	)		35,578
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Increase in deposits		42,892			85,238
Increase (decrease) in deposits								1,205,904			(165,800	)
Proceeds from Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings		475,000			100,000			475,000			470,000
Repayment of Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings		(305,070	)		(122,463	)		(1,096,157	)		(363,313	)
Increase in other short-term borrowings		59,104			11,025			107,047			5,725
Principal repayments of finance lease obligations		(104	)		(99	)		(314	)		(300	)
Decrease in federal funds purchased		(7,500	)		—
(Decrease) increase in federal funds purchased								(7,500	)		29,000
Repayment of junior subordinated debt		(6,702	)		(10,310	)		(6,702	)		(33,506	)
Dividends paid to common shareholders		(21,016	)		(15,824	)		(63,850	)		(49,656	)
Treasury shares (purchased) sold - net		(24,527	)		20
Net cash provided by financing activities		212,077			47,587
Issuance of preferred stock, net of issuance costs								144,529			—
Issuance of common stock								59			71
Treasury shares purchased - net								(25,012	)		(747	)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities								733,004			(108,526	)
Net increase in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash		359,076			167,708			525,470			75,147
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of the period		234,796			169,186			234,796			169,186
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of the period	$	593,872		$	336,894		$	760,266		$	244,333
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES
Interest paid on deposits and other borrowings	$	26,074		$	19,645		$	62,149		$	63,300
Income taxes paid		—			—			30,375			27,015
Transfers of loans to other real estate owned		28			402			263			684
Transfers of portfolio loans to loans held for sale		37,195			—			37,195			—
Transfer of held-to-maturity debt securities to available-for-sale debt securities		—			67,393
Transfers of held-to-maturity debt securities to available-for-sale debt securities								—			67,393
Right of use assets obtained in exchange for lease obligations		—			19,827			—			19,827

Basis of presentation — The accompanying unaudited interim financial statements of Wesbanco, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries (“Wesbanco”) have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements and should be read in conjunction with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019.

Wesbanco’s interim financial statements have been prepared following the significant accounting policies disclosed in Note 1 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of its 2019 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. In the opinion of management, the accompanying interim financial information reflects all adjustments, including normal recurring adjustments, necessary to present fairly Wesbanco’s financial position and results of operations for each of the interim periods presented. Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. Such reclassifications had no impact on Wesbanco’s net income and stockholders’ equity. Results of operations for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations that may be expected for a full year.

Loans and Loans Held for Sale — Loans originated by Wesbanco are reported at the principal amount outstanding, net of unearned income including credit valuation adjustments, unamortized deferred loan fee income and loan origination costs. Interest is accrued as earned on loans except where doubt exists as to collectability, in which case accrual of income is discontinued. Loans originated and intended for sale are carried, in aggregate, at ~~the~~their estimated market value, as Wesbanco elected the fair value option on October 1, 2017.

Loan origination fees and direct costs are deferred and accreted or amortized into interest income, as an adjustment to the yield, over the life of the loan using the level yield ~~method.~~method, or an approximation thereof. When a loan is paid off, the remaining unaccreted or unamortized net origination fees or costs are immediately recognized into income.

Loans are generally placed on non-accrual when they are 90 days past due, unless the loan is well-secured and in the process of collection. Loans may be returned to accrual status when a borrower has resumed paying principal and interest for a sustained period of at least six months and Wesbanco is reasonably assured of collecting the remaining contractual principal and interest. Loans are returned to accrual status at an amount equal to the principal balance of the loan at the time of non-accrual status less any payments applied to principal during the non-accrual period. Loans are reported as a troubled debt restructuring when Wesbanco, for economic or legal reasons related to a borrower’s financial difficulties, grants a concession to the borrower that it would not otherwise consider. Refer to the “Troubled Debt ~~Restructuring”~~Restructurings” policy below for additional detail.

A loan is considered non-performing, based on current information and events, if it is probable that Wesbanco will be unable to collect the payments of principal and interest when due according to the original contractual terms of the loan agreement. Non-performing loans include all non-accrual loans and troubled debt restructurings. Wesbanco recognizes interest income on non-accrual loans on the cash basis only if recovery of principal is reasonably assured.

Consumer loans are charged down to the net realizable value at 120 days past due for closed-end loans and 180 days past due for open-end revolving lines of credit. Residential real estate loans are charged down to the net realizable value of the collateral at 180 days past due. Commercial loans are charged down to the net realizable value when it is determined that Wesbanco will be unable to collect the principal amount in full. Loans are reclassified to other assets at the net realizable value when foreclosure or repossession of the collateral occurs. Refer to the “Other Real Estate Owned and Repossessed Assets” policy below for additional detail.

On March 27, 2020, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act ("CARES Act") was signed into law, which, in part, established a loan program administered through the U.S. Small Business Administration ("SBA"), referred to as the Paycheck Protection Program ("PPP"). Under the PPP, small businesses, sole proprietorships, independent contractors, non-profit organizations and self-employed individuals could apply for loans from existing SBA lenders and other approved regulated lenders that enrolled in the program, subject to numerous limitations and eligibility criteria. Wesbanco has participated as a lender in the PPP program. All loans have a 1% interest rate and Wesbanco earns a fee that is based upon a tiered schedule corresponding with the amount of the loan to the borrower, which is deferred and recognized over the life of the loan. Based upon the borrower meeting certain criteria as defined by the CARES act, the loan may be forgiven by the SBA. Wesbanco reports these loans at their principal amount outstanding, net of unearned income, unamortized deferred loan fee income and loan origination costs. Interest is accrued as earned and loan origination fees and direct costs are deferred and accreted or amortized into interest income, as an adjustment to the yield, over the life of the loan using the level yield method, or an approximation thereof. When a PPP loan is paid off or forgiven by the SBA, the remaining unaccreted or unamortized net origination fees or costs are immediately recognized into income

Troubled Debt Restructurings (“TDR”) — A restructuring of a loan constitutes a TDR if the creditor, for economic or legal reasons related to the debtor's financial difficulties, grants a concession to the debtor that it would not otherwise consider. The determination of whether a concession has been granted includes an evaluation of the debtor’s ability to access funds at a market rate for debt with similar risk characteristics and among other things, the significance of the modification relative to unpaid principal or collateral value of the debt, and/or the significance of a delay in the timing of payments relative to the frequency of payments, original maturity date, or the expected duration of the loan. The most common concessions granted generally include one or more modifications to the terms of the debt such as a reduction in the interest rate below the prevailing market rate for the remaining life of the debt, an extension of the maturity date at an interest rate lower than the prevailing market rate for new debt with similar risk, or reduction of the unpaid principal or interest. Additionally, all consumer bankruptcies are considered TDR; all TDRs are considered nonperforming loans.

When determining whether a debtor is experiencing financial difficulties, consideration is given to any known default on any of its debt or whether it is probable that the debtor would be in payment default in the foreseeable future without the modification. Other indicators of financial

difficulty include whether the debtor has declared or is in the process of declaring bankruptcy, the debtor’s ability to continue as a going concern, or the debtor’s projected cash flow to service its debt (including principal & interest) in accordance with the contractual terms for the foreseeable future, without a modification. If the payment of principal at original maturity is primarily dependent on the value of collateral, the current value of that collateral is considered in determining whether the principal will be paid.

The restructuring of a loan does not increase the allowance or provision for credit losses unless the loan is extended or the loans are commercial loans that are individually evaluated for impairment, in which case a specific reserve is established pursuant to GAAP. Portfolio segment loss history is the primary factor for establishing the allowance for residential real estate, home equity and consumer ~~loans.~~TDRs.

Non-accrual loans that are restructured remain on non-accrual, but may move to accrual status after they have performed according to the restructured terms for a period of time. TDRs on accrual status generally remain on accrual as long as they continue to perform in accordance with their modified terms. TDRs may also be placed on non-accrual if they do not perform in accordance with the restructured terms. Loans may be removed from TDR status after they have performed according to the renegotiated terms for a period of time if the interest rate under the modified terms is at or above market, or if the loan returns to its original terms.

~~On March 27, 2020, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (“CARES Act”) was signed into law.~~ Section 4013 of the CARES Act, “Temporary Relief From Troubled Debt Restructurings,” allows financial institutions the option to temporarily suspend certain requirements under U.S. GAAP related to TDRs for a limited period of time during the COVID-19 pandemic. On April 7, 2020, the joint federal regulatory agencies issued a statement, “Interagency Statement on Loan Modifications and Reporting for Financial Institutions Working With Customers Affected by the Coronavirus (Revised)” (“Interagency Statement”),” which further discusses loan modifications related to COVID-19. Wesbanco has extended up to a 180 day delay in loan principal and/or interest payments for customers ~~whom are~~ affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. These customers must meet certain criteria, such as they were in good standing and not more than 30 days past due ~~prior to~~either as of December 31, 2019, or as of the ~~pandemic,~~implementation of the modification program under the Interagency Statement, as well as other requirements noted in the regulatory agencies’ revised statement. Based on the CARES Act provisions and the guidance noted above, Wesbanco does not classify the COVID-19 loan modifications as TDRs, nor are the customers considered past due with regards to their delayed ~~payments.~~payments to the extent they meet the criteria. Upon exiting the loan modification deferral program, the measurement of loan delinquency will resume where it left off upon entry into the program.

On August 3, 2020, the joint federal regulatory agencies issued a statement, “Joint Statement on Additional Loan Accommodations Related to COVID-19”. This statement provides financial institutions with considerations for certain customers nearing the end of their COVID-19 loan deferral period noted above. As per this guidance and in accordance with the CARES Act noted above, Wesbanco is currently developing a plan to assist certain customers with additional deferrals of principal and/or interest, but also requiring detailed financial information from the customer to determine the financial need, the period of relief to be considered and the type of deferral warranted.

Acquired Loans - Loans acquired in connection with acquisitions are recorded at their acquisition-date fair value with no carryover of related allowance for credit losses. Acquired loans are classified into two ~~categories –purchased~~categories; purchased financial instruments with more than insignificant credit deterioration (“PCD”) loans, and loans with insignificant credit deterioration (“non-PCD”). PCD loans are defined as a loan or group of loans that have experienced more than insignificant credit deterioration since origination. Non-PCD loans will have an allowance established on acquisition date, which is recognized in the current period provision for credit losses. For PCD loans, an allowance is recognized on day 1 by adding it to the fair value of the loan, which is the “Day 1 amortized cost”. There is no credit loss expense recognized on PCD loans because the initial allowance is established by grossing-up the amortized cost of the PCD loan. Determining the fair value of the acquired loans involves estimating the principal and interest cash flows expected to be collected on the loans and discounting those cash flows at a market rate of interest. Management considers a number of factors in evaluating the acquisition-date fair value including the remaining life of the acquired loans, delinquency status, estimated prepayments, payment options and other loan features, internal risk grade, estimated value of the underlying collateral and interest rate environment.

PCD loans are accounted for in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 326-20, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses – Measure at Amortized Cost, if, at acquisition, the loan or pool of loans has experienced more-than-insignificant credit deterioration since origination. At acquisition, Wesbanco considers several factors as indicators that an acquired loan or pool of loans has experienced more-than-insignificant credit deterioration. These factors include loans 30 days or more past due, loans with an internal risk grade of below average or lower, loans classified as non-accrual by the acquired institution, the materiality of the credit and loans that have been previously modified in a troubled debt restructuring.

Under ~~the~~ ASC 326-20, a group of loans with similar risk characteristics can be assessed to determine if the pool of loans is PCD. However, if a loan does not have similar risk characteristics as any other acquired loan, the loan is individually assessed to determine if it is PCD. In addition, the initial allowance related to acquired loans can be estimated for a pool of loans if the loans have similar risk characteristics. Even if the loans were individually assessed to determine if they were PCD, they can be grouped together in the initial allowance calculation if they share similar risk characteristics. Since Wesbanco uses the discounted cash flow (DCF) approach, the initial allowance calculation for PCD loans is calculated as the expected contractual cash shortfalls, discounted at the rate that ~~equates~~equals the net present value of estimated future cash flows expected to be collected with the purchase price of the loan(s). If a PCD loan has an unfunded commitment at acquisition, the initial allowance for credit losses calculation reflects only the expected credit losses associated with the funded portion of the PCD loan. Expected credit losses associated with the unfunded commitment are included in the initial measurement of the commitment.

For PCD loans, the non-credit discount or premium is allocated to individual loans as determined by the difference between the loan’s amortized cost basis and the unpaid principal balance. The non-credit premium or discount is recognized into interest income on a level yield basis over the remaining expected life of the loan. For non-PCD loans, the interest and credit discount or premium is allocated to individual loans as determined by the difference between the loan’s amortized cost basis and the unpaid principal balance. The premium or discount is recognized into interest income on a level yield basis over the remaining expected life of the loan.

Allowance for Credit Losses — The allowance for credit losses reduces the loan portfolio to the net amount expected to be collected and establishes an allowance for unfunded loan commitments. The allowance for credit losses represents the lifetime expected losses for all loans and unfunded loan commitments at the initial recognition date. The allowance incorporates forward-looking information and applies a reversion methodology beyond the reasonable and supportable forecast. The allowance is increased by a provision charged to operating expense and reduced

by charge-offs, net of recoveries. Management evaluates the appropriateness of the allowance at least quarterly. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires material estimates that may be susceptible to significant change from period to period.

The allowance for credit loss calculation ~~(“CECL”)~~ is based on the loan’s amortized cost basis, which is comprised of the unpaid principal balance of the loan, deferred loan fees (costs), and acquired premium (discount) ~~less~~minus any write-downs. Wesbanco made an accounting policy election to exclude accrued interest from the measurement of the allowance for credit losses because the Company has a robust policy in place to reverse or write-off accrued interest when a loan is placed on ~~non-accrual.~~non-accrual, and also Wesbanco made an accounting policy election to reverse accrued interest deemed uncollectible as a reversal of interest income. However, Wesbanco is reserving, as part of the allowance for credit losses, for accrued interest on loan modifications under the CARES Act due to the nature and timing of these deferrals.

The allowance for credit losses reflects the risk of loss on the loan portfolio. To appropriately measure expected credit losses, management disaggregates the loan portfolio into pools of similar risk characteristics. The Company utilizes the probability of default (“PD”) / loss given default (“LGD”) approach to calculate the expected loss for each segment, which is then ~~discounted.~~discounted to net present value. PD is the probability the asset will default within a given timeframe and LGD is the percentage of the assets not expected to be collected due to default. The primary macroeconomic drivers of the quantitative model include forecasts of national unemployment and interest rate spreads. Management relies on macroeconomic forecasts obtained from various reputable sources, which may include the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) forecast and other publicly available forecasts from well recognized, leading economists. These forecasts can range from one to two years, depending upon the facts and circumstances of the current state of the economy, portfolio segment and management’s judgement of what can be reasonably supported. The model reversion period ranges from one to three years.

The allowance for credit losses is calculated over the loan’s contractual life. For term loans, the contractual life is calculated based on the maturity date. For commercial and industrial (“C&I”) revolving loans with no stated maturity date, the contractual life is calculated based on the internal review date. For all other revolving loans, the contractual life is based on either the estimated maturity date or a default date. The contractual term does not include expected ~~extension,~~extensions, renewals or modifications unless management has a reasonable expectation as of the reporting period that Wesbanco will execute a ~~troubled debt restructuring (“TDR”)~~TDR with the borrower. Management assumes a loan will become a TDR if a consumer loan has matured, has a principal balance, and has previously been partially charged-off. This assumption extends the maturity of these loans to the six months beyond maturity date.

The loan portfolio is segmented based on the risk profiles of the loans. Commercial loans are segmented between commercial real estate (“CRE”), which are collateralized by real estate, and ~~commercial & industrial (“~~C~~&I”),~~&I, which are typically utilized for general business purposes. CRE is further segmented between land and construction (“LCD”) and improved property, which are generally loans to purchase or refinance ~~owner-occupied and~~owner occupied or non-owner occupied investment properties. LCD loans have a unique risk that the developer or builder may not complete the project or not complete it on time or within budget. Improved property loans are reviewed for risk based on the underlying real estate property such as rental or owner income, appraisal value and other current lease ~~terms.~~terms, which affect debt service coverage and loan to value. Retail loans are a homogenous group, generally consisting of standardized products that are smaller in amount and distributed over a large number of individual borrowers. The group is segmented into 3 categories – residential real estate, HELOC and consumer.

Contractual terms ~~must be~~are adjusted for estimated prepayments to arrive at expected cash flows. Wesbanco models term loans with aan annualized “prepayment” ~~rate, annualized to one year.~~rate. When Wesbanco has a specific expectation of differing payment behavior for a given loan, the loan may be evaluated individually. For revolving loans that do not have a principal payment schedule, a curtailment rate is factored into the cash flow.

The evaluation also considers qualitative factors such as economic trends and conditions, which includes levels of regional unemployment, real estate values and the impact on specific industries and geographical markets, changes in lending policies and underwriting standards, delinquency and other credit quality trends, concentrations of credit risk, if any, the results of internal loan reviews and examinations by bank regulatory agencies ~~the volatility of historical loss rates and the velocity of changes in historical loss rates~~ pertaining to the allowance for credit losses. Management relies on observable data from internal and external sources to the extent it is available to evaluate each of these factors and adjusts the model’s quantitative results to reflect the impact these factors may have on probable losses in the portfolio. As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, there is concern within the banking industry that deferrals are delaying the overall impact of COVID-19 on the loan portfolio. As such, a temporary COVID-19 qualitative factor has been incorporated to recognize increased risk within the portfolio that is not captured by the quantitative output.

Commercial loans, ~~include commercial real estate (“CRE”)~~including CRE and C&I, greater than $1 million in balance that are reported as non-accrual, a troubled debt restructuring or that have other unique characteristics are tested individually for estimated credit losses. Specific reserves are established when appropriate for such loans based on the net present value of expected future cash flows of the loan or the estimated realizable value of the collateral, if any.

Management may also adjust its assumptions to account for differences between expected and actual losses from period to period. The variability of management’s assumptions could alter the level of the allowance for credit losses and may have a material impact on future results of operations and financial condition. The loss estimation models and methods used to determine the allowance for credit losses are continually refined and enhanced.

Recent accounting pronouncements – The Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) as noted below.

In March 2020, the FASB issued ASU 2020-04, “Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848)”. Due to the potential discontinuance of the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR), regulators have undertaken reference rate initiatives to identify alternative reference rates that are more observable or transaction based and less susceptible to manipulation. The ASU also provides ~~option~~optional expedients for contract modifications that replace a reference rate affected by reference rate reform. The guidance is effective as of March 12, 2020 through December 31, 2022. Wesbanco is ~~currently~~ assessing the impact of ~~ASU 2018-15~~adopting the new guidance on ~~Wesbanco’s Consolidated Financial Statements.~~the consolidated financial statements on an ongoing basis with no material impacts expected at this time.

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-15, “Intangibles - Goodwill and Other - Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement that is a Service Contract.” This ASU specifically aligns the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred in a hosting arrangement that is a service contract with the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred to develop or obtain internal-use software and hosting arrangements that include an internal-use software license. The ASU does not affect the accounting for the service element of a hosting arrangement that is a service contract. The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019 and interim periods within those fiscal years. ~~Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period.~~ For Wesbanco, this update was effective January 1, 2020. The adoption of this pronouncement did not have a material impact on Wesbanco’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

ASU 2018-14 Compensation—Retirement Benefits—Defined Benefit Plans—General (Topic 715-20)

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-14, “Compensation—Retirement Benefits—Defined Benefit Plans—General (Topic 715-20): Disclosure Framework—Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Defined Benefit Plans.” This ASU modifies Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 715-20 to improve disclosure requirements for employers that sponsor defined benefit pension or other postretirement plans. The guidance is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2020. Early adoption is permitted. Wesbanco is currently assessing the impact of ASU 2018-14 on Wesbanco’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

ASU 2018-13 Fair Value Measurement – Disclosure Framework – Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-13, “Fair Value Measurement – Disclosure Framework – Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement.” This ASU modifies the disclosure objective paragraphs of ASC 820 to eliminate (1) “at a minimum” from the phrase “an entity shall disclose at a minimum” and (2) other similar “open ended” disclosure requirements to promote the appropriate exercise of discretion of entities. The guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2019. ~~Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period.~~ For Wesbanco, this update was effective January 1, 2020. The adoption of this pronouncement did not have a material impact on Wesbanco’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

In September 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, “Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326),” which require entities to use a new forward-looking “expected loss” model also referred to as the current expected credit loss model (“CECL”) on trade and other receivables, held-to-maturity debt securities, loans and other instruments that generally will result in the earlier recognition of allowances for credit losses. For available-for-sale debt securities with unrealized losses, entities measure credit losses in a manner similarly to current procedures, except that the losses will be recognized as allowances rather than reductions in the amortized cost of the securities. Entities will have to disclose significantly more information, including information they use to track credit quality by year of origination for most financing receivables. In April 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-04, “Codification Improvements to Topic 326, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses, Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging and Topic 825, Financial Instruments” and in May 2019 the FASB issued ASU 2019-05, “Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326), Targeted Transition Relief. Public business entities must apply the new requirements for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years, which for Wesbanco was effective January 1, 2020. In December 2018, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) and the Office of Comptroller of the Currency (“OCC”) approved a final rule to address changes to credit loss accounting under GAAP, including banking organizations’ adoption of the CECL methodology. The final rule provides banking organizations the option to phase-in, over a three-year period, the day-one adverse effects on regulatory capital that may result from the adoption of the new accounting standard. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the joint federal bank regulatory agencies issued an optional extension of the regulatory capital transition, which allows for a two-year delay and then a three-year transition period from January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2024. Under the interim final rule, the amount of adjustments to regulatory capital deferred until the phase-in period includes both the initial impact of our adoption of CECL at January 1, 2020 and 25% of subsequent changes in our allowance for credit losses during each quarter of the two-year period ended December 31, 2021, (collectively, the “CECL regulatory capital transition adjustment”). Wesbanco has elected to defer the impact of CECL on its regulatory capital for two years and then will ~~phase in~~phase-in the impact of the adoption of this standard on the ~~company’s~~ regulatory capital tocalculations over the subsequent three-year period.

Under CECL, acquired loans or pools of loans that have experienced more-than-insignificant credit deterioration are deemed to be ~~purchased credit deteriorated (“PCD”)~~PCD loans, and are grossed-up on day 1 by the initial credit estimate through the allowance as opposed to a reduction in the loan’s amortized cost. The credit mark on acquired loans deemed not to be PCD loans are reflected as a reduction in the loan’s amortized cost, with an allowance and corresponding provision for credit losses recorded in the first reporting period after acquisition through current period earnings, while the loan mark will accrete through interest income over the life of such loans. At acquisition, Wesbanco will consider several factors as indicators that an acquired loan or pool of loans has experienced more-than-insignificant credit deterioration. These factors may include loans 30 days or more past due, loans with an internal risk grade of below average or lower, loans classified as non-accrual by the acquired institution, materiality of the credit and loans that have been previously modified in a ~~troubled debt restructuring (“TDR”).~~TDR. Upon adoption of this standard, acquired loans from prior acquisitions that meet the guidelines under ASC 310-30 (formerly known as “purchased ~~credit impaired”~~credit-impaired”) were reclassified as PCD loans. The accretable portion of the loan mark as of adoption date continues to accrete into interest income. However, the non-accretable portion of the loan mark was added to the allowance upon adoption, and any reversals of such mark will flow through the allowance in future periods. The loan mark on ASC 310-20 loans (“non-purchased ~~credit impaired”~~credit-impaired”) from prior acquisitions continues to accrete through interest income over the life of such loans.

allowance. Wesbanco engaged a third-party to validate the data inputs and the models utilized in the CECL calculation. In addition, the Company prepared documentation of the accounting policy decisions, changes to the business processes and procedures, and the control environment under the adoption of this standard. The day 1 impact on the allowance for credit losses was $41.4 million, which included a $6.7 million adjustment for PCD loans and a $3.0 million adjustment related to loan commitments. The after-tax effect on retained earnings was $26.6 million as of January 1, 2020. The day 1 CECL calculation iswas derived from the selected assumption of a one-year reasonable and supportable forecast, which was obtained from a third-party vendor. After the forecast period, Wesbanco reverts back over a one year period to historical loss rates adjusting for prepayments and curtailments, to estimate losses over the remaining life of loans. The most sensitive assumptions include the length of the forecast and reversion periods, forecast of unemployment and interest rate spreads and prepayment speeds. See Note 5, “Loans and Allowance for Credit Losses” for further detail.

Wesbanco recognized an allowance for credit losses for held-to-maturity (“HTM”) debt securities of $0.2 million as of January 1, 2020 upon adoption of this standard. See Note 4, “Investments” for further detail.

On November 22, 2019, Wesbanco completed its acquisition of OLBK, a bank holding company headquartered in Bowie, MD. On the acquisition date, OLBK had approximately $3.0 billion in assets, excluding goodwill, which included approximately $2.5 billion in loans and ~~$182.5~~$182.2 million in securities. The OLBK acquisition was valued at $494.0 million, based on Wesbanco’s closing stock price on November 22, 2019, of $36.75, and resulted in Wesbanco issuing 13,351,837 shares of its common stock in exchange for all of the outstanding shares of OLBK common stock, including stock options, of which the fair value was $3.3 million. The assets and liabilities of OLBK were recorded on Wesbanco’s Balance Sheet at their preliminary estimated fair values as of November 22, 2019, the acquisition date, and OLBK’s results of operations have been included in Wesbanco’s Consolidated Statements of Income since that date. Based on a preliminary purchase price allocation, Wesbanco recorded ~~$228.8~~$231.0 million in goodwill and $32.9 million in core deposit intangibles in its Community Banking segment. None of the goodwill is deductible for income tax purposes, as the acquisition is accounted for as a tax-free exchange for tax purposes. As a result of the integration of the operations of OLBK, it is not practicable to determine revenue or net income included in Wesbanco’s operating results relating to OLBK since the date of acquisition, as OLBK’s results cannot be separately identified.

For the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020, Wesbanco recorded merger-related expenses of ~~$5.2~~$6.3 million associated with the OLBK acquisition.

The preliminary purchase price of the OLBK acquisition and resulting goodwill is summarized as follows:

(unaudited, in thousands)	November 22, 2019			November 22, 2019
Purchase price:
Fair value of Wesbanco shares issued	$	493,936		$	493,936
Cash consideration for outstanding OLBK shares		16			16
Total purchase price	$	493,952		$	493,952
Fair value of:
Tangible assets acquired	$	2,894,254		$	2,892,298
Core deposit and other intangible assets acquired		32,899			32,899
Liabilities assumed		(2,721,999	)		(2,722,250	)
Net cash received in the acquisition		60,041			60,041
Fair value of net assets acquired		265,195			262,988
Goodwill recognized	$	228,757		$	230,964

The following table presents the preliminary allocation of the purchase price of the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition, as Wesbanco intends to finalize its accounting for the acquisition of OLBK within one year of the date of acquisition:

(unaudited, in thousands)	November 22, 2019		November 22, 2019
Assets acquired
Cash and due from banks	$	60,041	$	60,041
Securities		182,455		182,171
Loans		2,514,300		2,514,061
Goodwill and other intangible assets		261,656		263,863
Accrued income and other assets		197,499		196,066
Total assets acquired	$	3,215,951	$	3,216,202
Liabilities assumed
Deposits	$	2,375,574	$	2,375,574
Borrowings		286,047		286,047
Accrued expenses and other liabilities		60,378		60,629
Total liabilities assumed	$	2,721,999	$	2,722,250
Net assets acquired	$	493,952	$	493,952

The following table presents the changes in the allocation of the purchase price of the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed at the date of the acquisition from that previously reported ~~as of December 31, 2019:~~at June 30, 2020:

(unaudited, in thousands)	November 22, 2019			November 22, 2019
Goodwill recognized as of December 31, 2019	$	203,774
Goodwill recognized as of June 30, 2020				$	228,907
Change in fair value of net assets acquired:
Assets
Investment securities		(65	)		(284	)
Loans		(31,293	)		50
Other intangible assets		(692	)
Premises and equipment					(2,214	)
Deferred tax assets		7,365			641
Accrued income and other assets		(1,212	)		—
Liabilities
Borrowings		1,283			—
Accrued expenses and other liabilities		(369	)		(250	)
Fair value of net assets acquired	$	(24,983	)	$	(2,057	)
Increase in goodwill recognized		24,983			2,057
Goodwill recognized as of March 31, 2020	$	228,757
Goodwill recognized as of September 30, 2020				$	230,964

The fair value estimates for ~~loans (including loan classifications), premises and equipment,~~ deferred taxes and other assets/liabilities will continue to fluctuate until the final ~~valuations and/or appraisals~~tax returns are completed. The Company expects to finalize the purchase price accounting for OLBK within one year of the date of acquisition.

	For the Three Months Ended March 31,				For the Three Months Ended September 30,				For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
(unaudited, in thousands, except shares and per share amounts)	2020		2019		2020		2019		2020		2019
Numerator for both basic and diluted earnings per common share:
Net income	$	23,396	$	40,337	$	41,305	$	37,347	$	69,189	$	122,497
Denominator:
Total average basic common shares outstanding		67,486,550		54,598,499		67,214,759		54,695,578		67,268,449		54,641,057
Effect of dilutive stock options and other stock compensation		100,896		107,838		54,544		55,766		83,408		64,704
Total diluted average common shares outstanding		67,587,446		54,706,337		67,269,303		54,751,344		67,351,857		54,705,761
Earnings per common share - basic	$	0.35	$	0.74	$	0.61	$	0.68	$	1.03	$	2.24
Earnings per common share - diluted	$	0.35	$	0.74	$	0.61	$	0.68	$	1.03	$	2.24

As of ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020 and September 30, 2019 respectively, ~~510,186~~729,985 shares and ~~117,600~~352,250 options to purchase shares were not included in the computation of net income per diluted share for the three months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019, because the exercise price was greater than the average market price of ~~the~~a common share, therefore, the effect would be antidilutive.

As of ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020 and September 30, 2019 respectively,536,761 shares and 352,250 options to purchase shares were not included in the computation of net income per diluted share for the nine months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019, because the exercise price was greater than the average market price of a common share, therefore, the effect would be antidilutive.

As of September 30, 2020 and 2019, shares related to the ~~2019, 2018 and 2017~~ total shareholder return plans were not included in the calculation because the effect would be antidilutive. As of March 31, 2019, 44,688 contingently issuable shares were estimated to be awarded under the 2018 and 2017 total shareholder return plans, as stock performance targets had been met as of such date and therefore those shares were included in the diluted calculation.

Performance-based restricted stock compensation totaling ~~25,618~~27,371 and ~~17,081~~30,137 shares were estimated to be awarded as of ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively, and are included in the diluted calculation.

On November 22, 2019, Wesbanco issued 13,351,837 shares of common stock to complete its acquisition of OLBK and granted 34,998 shares of restricted stock to certain OLBK employees. These shares are included in average shares outstanding beginning on that date. For additional information relating to the OLBK acquisition, refer to Note 2, “Mergers and Acquisitions.”

The following table presents the fair value and amortized cost of available-for-sale and held-to-maturity debt securities:

	March 31, 2020									December 31, 2019									September 30, 2020									December 31, 2019
(unaudited, in thousands)	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Estimated Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Estimated Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Estimated Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Estimated Fair Value
Available-for-sale debt securities
U.S. Treasury	$	21,410	$	98	$	—		$	21,508	$	32,790	$	47	$	(1	)	$	32,836	$	19,985	$	7	$	—		$	19,992	$	32,790	$	47	$	(1	)	$	32,836
U.S. Government sponsored entities and agencies		154,661		4,743		(25	)		159,379		157,088		2,862		(322	)		159,628		184,877		7,978		(6	)		192,849		157,088		2,862		(322	)		159,628
Residential mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations of government sponsored entities and agencies		1,616,360		56,477		(1,368	)		1,671,469		1,803,268		18,850		(6,131	)		1,815,987		1,378,963		42,892		(832	)		1,421,023		1,803,268		18,850		(6,131	)		1,815,987
Commercial mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations of government sponsored entities and agencies		213,371		10,457		(1	)		223,827		187,268		3,270		(129	)		190,409		246,985		12,684		(59	)		259,610		187,268		3,270		(129	)		190,409
Obligations of states and political subdivisions		136,151		5,441		(19	)		141,573		140,357		5,253		(1	)		145,609		119,235		7,304		—			126,539		140,357		5,253		(1	)		145,609
Corporate debt securities		44,012		600		(286	)		44,326		48,645		581		(137	)		49,089		24,976		956		(21	)		25,911		48,645		581		(137	)		49,089
Total available-for-sale debt securities	$	2,185,965	$	77,816	$	(1,699	)	$	2,262,082	$	2,369,416	$	30,863	$	(6,721	)	$	2,393,558	$	1,975,021	$	71,821	$	(918	)	$	2,045,924	$	2,369,416	$	30,863	$	(6,721	)	$	2,393,558
Held-to-maturity debt securities
U.S. Government sponsored entities and agencies	$	9,041	$	90	$	(2	)	$	9,129	$	9,216	$	30	$	(116	)	$	9,130	$	8,256	$	317	$	—		$	8,573	$	9,216	$	30	$	(116	)	$	9,130
Residential mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations of government sponsored entities and agencies		116,214		4,274		(29	)		120,459		122,937		1,031		(261	)		123,707		99,703		3,797		(1	)		103,499		122,937		1,031		(261	)		123,707
Obligations of states and political subdivisions		655,952		21,246		(87	)		677,111		686,376		20,475		(258	)		706,593		605,636		28,379		(122	)		633,893		686,376		20,475		(258	)		706,593
Corporate debt securities		33,207		1,367		(153	)		34,421		33,224		1,869		—			35,093		33,172		3,264		—			36,436		33,224		1,869		—			35,093
Total held-to-maturity debt securities	$	814,414	$	26,977	$	(271	)	$	841,120	$	851,753	$	23,405	$	(635	)	$	874,523	$	746,767	$	35,757	$	(123	)	$	782,401	$	851,753	$	23,405	$	(635	)	$	874,523
Total debt securities	$	3,000,379	$	104,793	$	(1,970	)	$	3,103,202	$	3,221,169	$	54,268	$	(7,356	)	$	3,268,081	$	2,721,788	$	107,578	$	(1,041	)	$	2,828,325	$	3,221,169	$	54,268	$	(7,356	)	$	3,268,081

At ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, there were 0 holdings of any one issuer, other than U.S. government sponsored entities and its agencies, in an amount greater than 10% of Wesbanco’s shareholders’ equity. Equity securities, of which ~~$7.8~~$9.5 million consist of investments in various mutual funds held in grantor trusts formed in connection with the Company’s deferred compensation plan, are recorded at fair value, and totaled ~~$11.2~~$12.5 million and $12.3 million at ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively.

The following table presents the amortized cost and fair value of available-for-sale and held-to-maturity debt securities by contractual maturity date at ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020. Actual maturities will differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay debt obligations with or without prepayment penalties. Mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations are classified in the table below based on their contractual maturity date; however, regular principal payments and prepayments of principal are received on a monthly basis.

(unaudited, in thousands)	Amortized Cost		Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Fair Value
Available-for-sale debt securities
Less than one year	$	46,569	$	46,618	$	44,340	$	44,461
1-5 years		137,986		142,442		152,865		161,571
5-10 years		323,482		338,039		328,452		342,555
Over 10 years		1,677,928		1,734,983		1,449,364		1,497,337
Total available-for-sale debt securities	$	2,185,965	$	2,262,082	$	1,975,021	$	2,045,924
Held-to-maturity debt securities
Less than one year	$	18,699	$	18,756	$	11,901	$	12,005
1-5 years		122,987		127,113		119,398		126,351
5-10 years		300,223		308,896		263,457		275,405
Over 10 years		372,505		386,355		352,011		368,640
Total held-to-maturity debt securities	$	814,414	$	841,120	$	746,767	$	782,401
Total debt securities	$	3,000,379	$	3,103,202	$	2,721,788	$	2,828,325

Securities with an aggregate fair ~~values~~value of ~~$2.1~~$1.9 billion and $2.0 billion at ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively, were pledged as security for public and trust funds, and securities sold under agreements to repurchase. Proceeds from the sale of available-for-sale securities were ~~$222.7~~$226.1 million and ~~$66.1~~$125.2 million for the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively. Net unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities included in accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax, as of ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019 were ~~$58.0~~$54.0 million and $20.7 million, respectively.

The following table presents the gross realized gains and losses on sales and calls of available-for-sale and held-to-maturity debt securities, as well as gains and losses on equity securities from both sales and market adjustments, ~~from the adoption of ASU 2016-01 effective January 1, 2018,~~ for the three and nine months ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively. All gains and losses presented in the table below are included in the net securities gains (losses) line item of the income statement. For those equity securities relating to the key officer and director deferred compensation plan, the corresponding change in the obligation to the participant is recognized in employee benefits expense.

	For the Three Months Ended March 31,						For the Three Months Ended September 30,						For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
(unaudited, in thousands)	2020			2019			2020			2019			2020			2019
Debt securities:
Gross realized gains	$	3,335		$	242		$	100		$	1,096		$	3,715		$	1,443
Gross realized losses		(1,031	)		(191	)		(2	)		(741	)		(1,068	)		(950	)
Net gains on debt securities	$	2,304		$	51		$	98		$	355		$	2,647		$	493
Equity securities:
Net unrealized (losses) gains recognized on securities still held	$	(805	)	$	603
Net realized (losses) gains recognized on securities sold		(8	)		3
Net (losses) gains on equity securities	$	(813	)	$	606
Net unrealized gains recognized on securities still held							$	687		$	(120	)	$	936		$	748
Net realized gains (losses) recognized on securities sold								2			—			(6	)		2,559
Net gains on equity securities							$	689		$	(120	)	$	930		$	3,307
Net securities gains	$	1,491		$	657		$	787		$	235		$	3,577		$	3,800

On January 1, 2020, Wesbanco adopted CECL. Upon adoption, the Company recognized $0.2 million to opening retained earnings, which represents the CECL allowance as of January 1, 2020. The corporate and municipal bonds in Wesbanco’s held-to-maturity debt portfolio are analyzed quarterly to determine if an allowance for current expected credit losses is warranted. Wesbanco uses a database of historical financials of all corporate and municipal issuers and actual historic default and recovery rates on rated and non-rated transactions to estimate expected credit losses on an individual security basis. The expected credit losses are adjusted quarterly and are recorded in an allowance for expected credit losses on the balance sheet, which is deducted from the amortized cost basis of the held-to-maturity portfolio as a contra asset. The losses are recorded on the income statement in the provision for credit losses. Accrued interest receivable on held-to-maturity securities, which was ~~$7.2~~$6.3 million as of ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020, is excluded from the estimate of credit losses. Held-to-maturity investments in U.S. Government sponsored entities and agencies as well as mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations, which are all either issued by a direct governmental entity or a government-sponsored entity, have no historical evidence supporting expected credit losses; therefore, Wesbanco has estimated these losses at ~~zero,~~0, and will monitor this assumption in the future for any economical or governmental policies that could affect this assumption.

The following table provides a ~~rollforward~~roll-forward of the allowance for credit losses on held-to-maturity securities for the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020:

											Allowance for Credit Losses By Category
											For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2020
													Residential mortgage
													-backed
	Allowance for Credit Losses By Category												securities and
	For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2020												collateralized
			Residential mortgage -backed		Obligations of								mortgage obligations		Obligations of
	U.S. Government		securities and collateralized		state and		Corporate				U.S. Government		of government		state and		Corporate
	sponsored		mortgage obligations of government		political		debt				sponsored		sponsored entities		political		debt
(unaudited, in thousands)	entities and agencies		sponsored entities and agencies		subdivisions		Securities		Total		entities and agencies		and agencies		subdivisions		Securities		Total
Beginning balance at January 1, 2020	$	—	$	—	$	96	$	133	$	229	$	—	$	—	$	96	$	133	$	229
Current period provision		—		—		2		5		7		—		—		172		60		232
Write-offs		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Recoveries		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Ending balance at March 31, 2020	$	—	$	—	$	98	$	138	$	236
Ending balance at September 30, 2020											$	—	$	—	$	268	$	193	$	461

The following table provides information on unrealized losses on available-for-sale debt securities that have been in an unrealized loss position for less than twelve months and twelve months or more, for which an allowance for credit losses has not been recorded as of ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020:

Unrealized losses on debt securities in the ~~tables~~table above ~~represent~~represents temporary fluctuations resulting from changes in market rates in relation to fixed yields. Unrealized losses in the available-for-sale portfolio are accounted for as an adjustment, net of taxes, to other comprehensive income in shareholders’ equity. Wesbanco does not believe the securities presented above are impaired due to reasons of credit quality, as substantially all debt securities are rated above investment grade and all are paying principal and interest according to their contractual terms. Wesbanco does not intend to sell, nor is it more likely than not that it will be required to sell, loss position securities prior to recovery of their cost; therefore, management believes the unrealized losses detailed above do not require an allowance for credit losses relating to these securities to be recognized. Securities that do not have readily determinable fair values and for which Wesbanco does not exercise significant influence are carried at cost. Cost method investments consist primarily of FHLB of Pittsburgh, Cincinnati and Indianapolis stock totaling ~~$73.9~~$44.7 million and $66.8 million at ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively, and are included in other assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Cost method investments are evaluated for impairment whenever events or circumstances suggest that their carrying value may not be recoverable.

The following table provides information on unrealized losses on held-to-maturity and available-for-sale debt securities that have been in an unrealized loss position for less than twelve months and twelve months or more as of December 31, 2019, prior to the date of adoption of the credit loss standard, and as defined by the previous accounting guidance in effect at that time:

	December 31, 2019																					December 31, 2019
	Less than 12 months							12 months or more							Total							Less than 12 months							12 months or more							Total
(unaudited, dollars in thousands)	Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			# of Securities		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			# of Securities		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			# of Securities		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			# of Securities		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			# of Securities		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			# of Securities
U.S. Treasury	$	1,499	$	(1	)		1	$	—	$	—			—	$	1,499	$	(1	)		1	$	1,499	$	(1	)		1	$	—	$	—			—	$	1,499	$	(1	)		1
U.S. Government sponsored entities and agencies		57,650		(274	)		25		6,593		(164	)		2		64,243		(438	)		27		57,650		(274	)		25		6,593		(164	)		2		64,243		(438	)		27
Residential mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations of government sponsored entities and agencies		544,692		(3,725	)		116		272,884		(2,667	)		122		817,576		(6,392	)		238		544,692		(3,725	)		116		272,884		(2,667	)		122		817,576		(6,392	)		238
Commercial mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations of government sponsored entities and agencies		43,123		(124	)		7		3,704		(5	)		2		46,827		(129	)		9		43,123		(124	)		7		3,704		(5	)		2		46,827		(129	)		9
Obligations of states and political subdivisions		17,876		(122	)		22		4,413		(137	)		8		22,289		(259	)		30		17,876		(122	)		22		4,413		(137	)		8		22,289		(259	)		30
Corporate debt securities		4,120		(44	)		1		4,926		(93	)		2		9,046		(137	)		3		4,120		(44	)		1		4,926		(93	)		2		9,046		(137	)		3
Total	$	668,960	$	(4,290	)		172	$	292,520	$	(3,066	)		136	$	961,480	$	(7,356	)		308	$	668,960	$	(4,290	)		172	$	292,520	$	(3,066	)		136	$	961,480	$	(7,356	)		308

The recorded investment in loans is presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheets net of deferred loan fees and costs, and discounts on purchased loans. Net deferred loan ~~costs were $5.0~~income (cost) was $13.3 million and ~~$4.8~~($4.8) million at ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively. The ~~unaccreted~~September 30, 2020 balance included $19.5 million of net deferred income from PPP loans. The un-accreted discount on purchased loans from acquisitions was ~~$52.5~~$44.1 million at ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020, including ~~$27.8~~ $23.9million related to OLBK, and $51.9 million at December 31, 2019. Wesbanco made an accounting policy election to exclude accrued interest from the measurement of the allowance for credit losses because the Company has a robust policy in place to reverse or write-off accrued interest in a timely manner. Wesbanco made an accounting policy election to reverse accrued interest deemed uncollectible as a reversal of interest income.

	March 31,		December 31,		September 30,		December 31,
(unaudited, in thousands)	2020		2019		2020		2019
Commercial real estate:
Land and construction	$	676,726	$	777,151	$	690,547	$	777,151
Improved property		4,927,679		4,947,857		5,018,101		4,947,857
Total commercial real estate		5,604,405		5,725,008		5,708,648		5,725,008
Commercial and industrial		1,801,751		1,644,699		1,654,116		1,644,699
Commercial and industrial - PPP						853,119		—
Residential real estate		1,929,590		1,873,647		1,798,019		1,873,647
Home equity		650,754		649,678		647,052		649,678
Consumer		363,096		374,953		328,592		374,953
Total portfolio loans		10,349,596		10,267,985		10,989,546		10,267,985
Loans held for sale		48,021		43,013		134,151		43,013
Total loans	$	10,397,617	$	10,310,998	$	11,123,697	$	10,310,998

On January 1, 2020, Wesbanco adopted ASU 2016-13 (Topic 326), Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments. Upon adoption, the Company recognized $41.4 million as an increase to the allowance for credit losses, which represents the difference in the incurred allowance as of December 31, 2019 and the CECL allowance as of January 1, 2020. This adjustment includes a $6.7 million increase to the allowance related to PCD loans as of January 1, 2020. See Note 1, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” for the Company’s revised accounting policies related to Loans and Allowance for Credit Losses and adoption of this standard.

The allowance for credit losses under CECL is calculated utilizing the PD / LGD, which is then ~~discounted.~~discounted to net present value. PD is the probability the asset will default within a given time frame and LGD is the percentage of the asset not expected to be collected due to default. The primary macroeconomic drivers of the quantitative model include forecasts of national unemployment and interest rates, as well as modeling adjustments for changes in prepayment speeds, loan risk grades, portfolio mix, concentrations and loan growth. For the calculation as of ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020, the one-year forecast was based upon a blended rate from two nationally-recognized published economic ~~data~~forecasts through ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020, and is primarily driven by the national unemployment and interest rate spread forecasts. AsWesbanco’s blended forecast of ~~quarter-end,~~ national unemployment, at quarter end, was projected to peak at ~~8.7%~~8.4% in the ~~second~~fourth quarter, and subsequently ~~decreases~~decrease to an average of ~~6.5%~~7.6% over the remainder of the forecast period. The ~~quantitative results were adjusted downward due to the expanded definition of unemployment and unprecedented government stimulus, which was not considered in the quantitative model. The~~ calculation utilized a one-year reversion ~~period.~~period back to the Company’s historical loss rate by loan classification. Included in the qualitative factors were COVID-19 pandemic factors related to the transient credit risk not covered by the traditional allowance process, adjusted to Wesbanco’s regional footprint, deferred interest on modified loans, and industry concentrations such as hospitality and retail. Wesbanco made an accounting policy election to exclude accrued interest from the measurement of the allowance for credit losses because the Company has a robust policy in place to reverse or write-off accrued interest when loans are placed on non-accrual. However, Wesbanco does have a $0.4 million reserve on the accrued interest related to loan modifications allowed under the CARES Act due to the timing and nature of these modifications. As of ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020, accrued interest receivable for loans was ~~$33.5 million.~~$52.4 million, including $24.0 million related to COVID-19 loan modifications as permitted under the CARES Act.

The following tables summarize changes in the allowance for credit losses applicable to each category of the loan portfolio:

	Allowance for Credit Losses By Category																								Allowance for Credit Losses By Category
	For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2020 and 2019																								For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2020 and 2019
(unaudited, in thousands)	Commercial Real Estate - Land and Construction			Commercial Real Estate- Improved Property			Commercial & Industrial			Residential Real Estate			Home Equity			Consumer			Deposit Overdrafts			Total			Commercial Real Estate - Land and Construction			Commercial Real Estate- Improved Property			Commercial & Industrial			Residential Real Estate			Home Equity			Consumer			Deposit Overdrafts			Total
Balance at December 31, 2019
Allowance for credit losses - loans	$	4,949		$	20,293		$	14,116		$	4,311		$	4,422		$	2,951		$	1,387		$	52,429		$	4,949		$	20,293		$	14,116		$	4,311		$	4,422		$	2,951		$	1,387		$	52,429
Allowance for credit losses - loan commitments		235			22			311			15			250			41			—			874			235			22			311			15			250			41			—			874
Total beginning allowance for credit losses - loans and loan commitments		5,184			20,315			14,427			4,326			4,672			2,992			1,387			53,303			5,184			20,315			14,427			4,326			4,672			2,992			1,387			53,303
Impact of adopting ASC 326		1,524			13,078			22,357			5,630			(3,936	)		2,576			213			41,442			1,524			13,078			22,357			5,630			(3,936	)		2,576			213			41,442
Provision for credit losses:
Provision for loan losses		2,564			20,585			5,632			237			646			(1,241	)		(351	)		28,072			9,150			73,774			9,923			2,779			1,793			3,160			139			100,718
Provision for loan commitments		2,274			—			(582	)		49			2			—			—			1,743			5,888			—			858			199			52			3			—			7,000
Total provision for credit losses - loans and loan commitments		4,838			20,585			5,050			286			648			(1,241	)		(351	)		29,815			15,038			73,774			10,781			2,978			1,845			3,163			139			107,718
Charge-offs		(1	)		(1,398	)		(2,714	)		(386	)		(443	)		(856	)		(328	)		(6,126	)		(51	)		(1,903	)		(3,329	)		(809	)		(857	)		(2,860	)		(760	)		(10,569	)
Recoveries		8			293			107			272			172			415			143			1,410			85			702			852			487			419			1,136			363			4,044
Net charge-offs		7			(1,105	)		(2,607	)		(114	)		(271	)		(441	)		(185	)		(4,716	)		34			(1,201	)		(2,477	)		(322	)		(438	)		(1,724	)		(397	)		(6,525	)
Balance at March 31, 2020
Balance at September 30, 2020
Allowance for credit losses - loans		6,442			52,873			39,227			9,684			1,096			3,886			1,064			114,272			13,055			105,966			43,648			12,018			2,076			7,004			1,342			185,109
Allowance for credit losses - loan commitments		5,111			—			—			444			17			—			—			5,572			8,725			—			1,440			594			67			3			—			10,829
Total ending allowance for credit losses - loans and loan commitments	$	11,553		$	52,873		$	39,227		$	10,128		$	1,113		$	3,886		$	1,064		$	119,844		$	21,780		$	105,966		$	45,088		$	12,612		$	2,143		$	7,007		$	1,342		$	195,938

Balance at December 31, 2018
Allowance for loan losses	$	4,039		$	20,848		$	12,114		$	3,822		$	4,356		$	2,797		$	972		$	48,948		$	4,039		$	20,848		$	12,114		$	3,822		$	4,356		$	2,797		$	972		$	48,948
Allowance for loan commitments		169			33			262			12			226			39			—			741			169			33			262			12			226			39			—			741
Total beginning allowance for credit losses		4,208			20,881			12,376			3,834			4,582			2,836			972			49,689			4,208			20,881			12,376			3,834			4,582			2,836			972			49,689
Provision for credit losses:
Provision for loan losses		(6	)		(909	)		1,050			122			223			233			575			1,288			(207	)		2,939			2,549			561			727			405			1,503			8,477
Provision for loan commitments		25			(9	)		1,181			(1	)		22			1			—			1,219			26			(9	)		842			3			37			(1	)		—			898
Total provision for credit losses		19			(918	)		2,231			121			245			234			575			2,507			(181	)		2,930			3,391			564			764			404			1,503			9,375
Charge-offs		—			(222	)		(635	)		(320	)		(357	)		(661	)		(441	)		(2,636	)		(45	)		(515	)		(1,420	)		(870	)		(859	)		(1,886	)		(1,273	)		(6,868	)
Recoveries		12			198			378			121			47			411			99			1,266			255			621			545			272			341			1,432			294			3,760
Net charge-offs		12			(24	)		(257	)		(199	)		(310	)		(250	)		(342	)		(1,370	)		210			106			(875	)		(598	)		(518	)		(454	)		(979	)		(3,108	)
Balance at March 31, 2019
Balance at September 30, 2019
Allowance for loan losses		4,045			19,915			12,907			3,745			4,269			2,780			1,205			48,866			4,042			23,893			13,788			3,785			4,565			2,748			1,496			54,317
Allowance for loan commitments		194			24			1,443			11			248			40			—			1,960			195			24			1,104			15			263			38			—			1,639
Total ending allowance for credit losses	$	4,239		$	19,939		$	14,350		$	3,756		$	4,517		$	2,820		$	1,205		$	50,826		$	4,237		$	23,917		$	14,892		$	3,800		$	4,828		$	2,786		$	1,496		$	55,956

The following tables present the allowance for credit losses and recorded investments in loans by ~~category:~~category, as of each period-end:

	Allowance for Credit Losses and Recorded Investment in Loans																Allowance for Credit Losses and Recorded Investment in Loans
(unaudited, in thousands)	Commercial Real Estate- Land and Construction		Commercial Real Estate- Improved Property		Commercial and Industrial		Residential Real Estate		Home Equity		Consumer		Deposit Over- drafts		Total		Commercial Real Estate- Land and Construction		Commercial Real Estate- Improved Property		Commercial and Industrial		Residential Real Estate		Home Equity		Consumer		Deposit Over- drafts		Total
March 31, 2020
September 30, 2020
Allowance for credit losses:
Loans individually-evaluated	$	692	$	3,952	$	2,084	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	6,728	$	597	$	3,857	$	1,438	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	5,892
Loans collectively-evaluated		5,750		48,921		37,143		9,684		1,096		3,886		1,064		107,544		12,458		102,109		42,210		12,018		2,076		7,004		1,342		179,217
Loan commitments		5,111		—		—		444		17		—		—		5,572		8,725		—		1,440		594		67		3		—		10,829
Total allowance for credit losses - loans and commitments	$	11,553	$	52,873	$	39,227	$	10,128	$	1,113	$	3,886	$	1,064	$	119,844	$	21,780	$	105,966	$	45,088	$	12,612	$	2,143	$	7,007	$	1,342	$	195,938

Portfolio loans:
Individually-evaluated for credit losses⁽¹⁾	$	1,541	$	17,998	$	4,527	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	24,066	$	1,481	$	17,278	$	4,006	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	22,765
Collectively-evaluated for credit losses		675,185		4,909,681		1,797,224		1,929,590		650,754		363,096		—		10,325,530		689,066		5,000,823		2,503,229		1,798,019		647,052		328,592		—		10,966,781
Total portfolio loans	$	676,726	$	4,927,679	$	1,801,751	$	1,929,590	$	650,754	$	363,096	$	—	$	10,349,596	$	690,547	$	5,018,101	$	2,507,235	$	1,798,019	$	647,052	$	328,592	$	—	$	10,989,546

December 31, 2019
Allowance for credit losses:
Allowance for loans individually evaluated for impairment	$	—	$	93	$	10	$	14	$	6	$	1	$	—	$	124	$	—	$	93	$	10	$	14	$	6	$	1	$	—	$	124
Allowance for loans collectively evaluated for impairment		4,949		20,200		14,106		4,297		4,416		2,950		1,387		52,305		4,949		20,200		14,106		4,297		4,416		2,950		1,387		52,305
Allowance for loan commitments		235		22		311		15		250		41		—		874		235		22		311		15		250		41		—		874
Total allowance for credit losses	$	5,184	$	20,315	$	14,427	$	4,326	$	4,672	$	2,992	$	1,387	$	53,303	$	5,184	$	20,315	$	14,427	$	4,326	$	4,672	$	2,992	$	1,387	$	53,303

Portfolio loans:
Individually evaluated for impairment ⁽¹⁾	$	—	$	3,907	$	11,961	$	4,392	$	704	$	53	$	—	$	21,017	$	—	$	3,907	$	11,961	$	4,392	$	704	$	53	$	—	$	21,017
Collectively evaluated for impairment		777,033		4,935,383		1,631,855		1,865,151		648,221		374,812		—		10,232,455		777,033		4,935,383		1,631,855		1,865,151		648,221		374,812		—		10,232,455
Acquired with deteriorated credit quality		118		8,567		883		4,104		753		88		—		14,513		118		8,567		883		4,104		753		88		—		14,513
Total portfolio loans	$	777,151	$	4,947,857	$	1,644,699	$	1,873,647	$	649,678	$	374,953	$	—	$	10,267,985	$	777,151	$	4,947,857	$	1,644,699	$	1,873,647	$	649,678	$	374,953	$	—	$	10,267,985

~~Wesbanco~~ ~~has transitioned to a more objective internal loan grading system to reflect the credit quality of commercial loans.~~ Commercial loan risk grades are determined based on an evaluation of the relevant characteristics of each loan, assigned at inception and adjusted thereafter at any time to reflect changes in the risk profile throughout the life of each loan. The primary factors used to determine the risk grade are the sufficiency, reliability and sustainability of the primary source of repayment and overall financial strength of the borrower. The rating system more heavily weights the debt service coverage, leverage and loan to value factors to derive the risk grade. Other factors that are considered at a lesser weighting include management, industry or property type risks, payment history, collateral or guarantees.

Commercial real estate – land and construction consists of loans to finance investments in vacant land, land development, construction of residential housing, and construction of commercial buildings. Commercial real estate – improved property consists of loans for the purchase or refinance of all types of improved owner-occupied and investment properties. Factors that are considered in assigning the risk grade vary depending on the type of property financed. The risk grade assigned to construction and development loans is based on the overall viability of the project, the experience and financial capacity of the developer or builder to successfully complete the project, project specific and market absorption rates and comparable property values, and the amount of pre-sales for residential housing construction or pre-leases for commercial investment property. The risk grade assigned to commercial investment property loans is based primarily on the adequacy of the net operating income generated by the property to service the debt, the loan to appraised value, the type, quality, industry and mix of tenants, and the terms of leases. The risk grade assigned to owner-occupied commercial real estate is based primarily on global debt service coverage and the leverage of the business, but may also consider the industry in which the business operates, the business’ specific competitive advantages or disadvantages, collateral margins and the quality and experience of management.

~~Commercial and industrial (“~~C~~&I”)~~&I loans consist of revolving lines of credit to finance accounts receivable, inventory and other general business purposes; term loans to finance fixed assets other than real estate, and letters of credit to support trade, insurance or governmental requirements for a variety of businesses. Most C&I borrowers are privately-held companies with annual sales up to $100 million. Primary factors that are considered in risk rating C&I loans include debt service coverage and leverage. Other factors including operating trends, collateral coverage along with management experience are also considered.

Pass loans are those that exhibit a history of positive financial results that are at least comparable to the average for their industry or type of real estate. The primary source of repayment is acceptable and these loans are expected to perform satisfactorily during most economic cycles. Pass loans typically have no significant external factors that are expected to adversely affect these borrowers more than others in the same industry or property type. Any minor unfavorable characteristics of these loans are outweighed or mitigated by other positive factors including but not limited to adequate secondary or tertiary sources of repayment.

Criticized loans, considered as compromised, have potential weaknesses that deserve management's close attention. If left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects for the asset or in the bank's credit position at some future date. Criticized loans are not adversely classified by the banking regulators and do not expose the bank to sufficient risk to warrant adverse classification.

Classified loans, considered as substandard and doubtful, are equivalent to the classifications used by banking regulators. Substandard loans are inadequately protected by the current sound worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. Loans so classified must have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. They are characterized by the distinct possibility that the bank will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected. These loans may or may not be reported as non-accrual. Doubtful loans have all the weaknesses inherent in those classified substandard, with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently known facts, conditions, and values, highly questionable and improbable. These loans are reported as non-accrual.

	Commercial Loans by Internally Assigned Risk Grade								Commercial Loans by Internally Assigned Risk Grade
(unaudited, in thousands)	Commercial Real Estate- Land and Construction		Commercial Real Estate- Improved Property		Commercial & Industrial		Total Commercial Loans		Commercial Real Estate- Land and Construction		Commercial Real Estate- Improved Property		Commercial & Industrial		Total Commercial Loans
As of March 31, 2020
As of September 30, 2020
Pass	$	672,042	$	4,777,861	$	1,740,290	$	7,190,193	$	664,518	$	4,736,970	$	2,457,537	$	7,859,025
Criticized - compromised		1,661		78,112		41,028		120,801		21,948		199,030		27,286		248,264
Classified - substandard		3,023		71,706		20,433		95,162		4,081		82,101		22,412		108,594
Classified - doubtful		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Total	$	676,726	$	4,927,679	$	1,801,751	$	7,406,156	$	690,547	$	5,018,101	$	2,507,235	$	8,215,883

As of December 31, 2019
Pass	$	769,537	$	4,807,003	$	1,570,689	$	7,147,229	$	769,537	$	4,807,003	$	1,570,689	$	7,147,229
Criticized - compromised		4,338		65,612		49,009		118,959		4,338		65,612		49,009		118,959
Classified - substandard		3,276		75,242		13,231		91,749		3,276		75,242		13,231		91,749
Classified - doubtful		—		—		11,770		11,770		—		—		11,770		11,770
Total	$	777,151	$	4,947,857	$	1,644,699	$	7,369,707	$	777,151	$	4,947,857	$	1,644,699	$	7,369,707

Residential real estate, home equity and consumer loans are not assigned internal risk grades other than as required by regulatory guidelines that are based primarily on the age of past due loans. Wesbanco primarily evaluates the credit quality of residential real estate, home equity and consumer loans based on repayment performance and historical loss rates. The aggregate amount of residential real estate, home equity and consumer loans classified as substandard in accordance with regulatory guidelines was ~~$28.7~~$30.0 million at ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020 and $28.3 million at December 31, 2019, of which ~~$5.4~~$6.9 million and $5.1 million were accruing, for each period, respectively. The aggregate amount of residential real estate, home equity and consumer loans classified as substandard, as well as $28.2 million and $15.6 million of unfunded commercial loan commitments are not included in the tables ~~above.~~above at September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively.

Acquired OLBK Loans —In conjunction with the OLBK acquisition, Wesbanco acquired loans with a book value of $2,570.0 million as of November 22, ~~2019 (prior to the adoption of CECL on January 1, 2020).~~2019. These loans were recorded at the preliminary fair value of ~~$2,514.3~~$2,514.1 million, with ~~$2,543.8~~$2,544.4 million categorized as ASC 310-20 ~~loans.~~loans, of which $56.6 million of loans were sold during the first quarter of 2020 for $36.4 million. For the loans sold, the acquisition date fair value was adjusted to the sale price resulting in no recognized gain or loss. The fair market value adjustment on ~~these~~the loans retained of ~~$55.6~~$28.9 million at acquisition date is expected to be recognized into interest income on a level yield basis over the remaining expected life of the loans. Loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality (ASC 310-30) with a book value of ~~$26.2~~$25.6 million were recorded at the preliminary fair value of ~~$19.2~~$18.7 million, of which $4.0 million were accounted for under the cost recovery method as cash flows could not be reasonably estimated, and therefore they are categorized as non-accrual. Upon adoption of CECL on January 1, 2020, $6.1 million of credit mark on OLBK PCD loans was reclassified to allowance for credit ~~loss.~~losses. At ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020, the remaining allowance for credit losses on individually analyzed OLBK-acquired loans was ~~$6.0~~$5.1 million. The carrying amount of loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality at ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020 was ~~$21.3~~$19.6 million, while the outstanding customer balance was ~~$21.8~~$20.0 million, and included ~~$2.6~~$2.0 million of non-performing loans. Certain acquired under performing loans with an acquired book value of $56.6 million were sold during the first quarter of 2020 for $36.7 million of which $8.9 million were classified as held for sale as March 31, 2020. The acquisition date fair value of the acquired loans was adjusted to the sale price resulting in no recognized gain or loss.

	Age Analysis of Loans														Age Analysis of Loans
(unaudited, in thousands)	Current		30-59 Days Past Due		60-89 Days Past Due		90 Days or More Past Due		Total Past Due		Total Loans		90 Days or More Past Due and Accruing (1)		Current		30-59 Days Past Due		60-89 Days Past Due		90 Days or More Past Due		Total Past Due		Total Loans		90 Days or More Past Due and Accruing (1)
As of March 31, 2020
As of September 30, 2020
Commercial real estate:
Land and construction	$	674,429	$	825	$	645	$	827	$	2,297	$	676,726	$	804	$	688,200	$	148	$	813	$	1,386	$	2,347	$	690,547	$	572
Improved property		4,901,283		7,418		5,935		13,043		26,396		4,927,679		5,589		5,003,740		2,318		2,153		9,890		14,361		5,018,101		896
Total commercial real estate		5,575,712		8,243		6,580		13,870		28,693		5,604,405		6,393		5,691,940		2,466		2,966		11,276		16,708		5,708,648		1,468
Commercial and industrial		1,791,414		4,677		610		5,050		10,337		1,801,751		2,623		2,500,038		2,164		781		4,252		7,197		2,507,235		1,882
Residential real estate		1,908,239		5,409		2,209		13,733		21,351		1,929,590		3,583		1,776,074		1,822		3,604		16,519		21,945		1,798,019		5,491
Home equity		642,906		2,839		859		4,150		7,848		650,754		894		640,025		3,006		354		3,667		7,027		647,052		937
Consumer		359,109		2,442		690		855		3,987		363,096		794		325,925		1,405		771		491		2,667		328,592		392
Total portfolio loans		10,277,380		23,610		10,948		37,658		72,216		10,349,596		14,287		10,934,002		10,863		8,476		36,205		55,544		10,989,546		10,170
Loans held for sale		48,021		—		—		—		—		48,021		—		134,151		—		—		—		—		134,151		—
Total loans	$	10,325,401	$	23,610	$	10,948	$	37,658	$	72,216	$	10,397,617	$	14,287	$	11,068,153	$	10,863	$	8,476	$	36,205	$	55,544	$	11,123,697	$	10,170

Nonperforming loans included above are as follows:
Non-accrual loans	$	9,560	$	1,035	$	511	$	23,261		24,807	$	34,367			$	9,622	$	1,120	$	559	$	25,965		27,644	$	37,266
TDRs accruing interest ⁽¹⁾		5,117		55		152		110		317		5,434				3,799		68		254		70		392		4,191
Total non-performing	$	14,677	$	1,090	$	663	$	23,371	$	25,124	$	39,801			$	13,421	$	1,188	$	813	$	26,035	$	28,036	$	41,457

As of December 31, 2019
Commercial real estate:
Land and construction	$	776,153	$	529	$	121	$	348	$	998	$	777,151	$	26	$	776,153	$	529	$	121	$	348	$	998	$	777,151	$	26
Improved property		4,921,721		10,207		5,639		10,290		26,136		4,947,857		4,709		4,921,721		10,207		5,639		10,290		26,136		4,947,857		4,709
Total commercial real estate		5,697,874		10,736		5,760		10,638		27,134		5,725,008		4,735		5,697,874		10,736		5,760		10,638		27,134		5,725,008		4,735
Commercial and industrial		1,635,232		2,519		2,813		4,135		9,467		1,644,699		1,793		1,635,232		2,519		2,813		4,135		9,467		1,644,699		1,793
Residential real estate		1,850,806		4,421		5,372		13,048		22,841		1,873,647		3,643		1,850,806		4,421		5,372		13,048		22,841		1,873,647		3,643
Home equity		641,026		3,323		621		4,708		8,652		649,678		985		641,026		3,323		621		4,708		8,652		649,678		985
Consumer		370,934		2,537		965		517		4,019		374,953		457		370,934		2,537		965		517		4,019		374,953		457
Total portfolio loans		10,195,872		23,536		15,531		33,046		72,113		10,267,985		11,613		10,195,872		23,536		15,531		33,046		72,113		10,267,985		11,613
Loans held for sale		43,013		—		—		—		—		43,013		—		43,013		—		—		—		—		43,013		—
Total loans	$	10,238,885	$	23,536	$	15,531	$	33,046	$	72,113	$	10,310,998	$	11,613	$	10,238,885	$	23,536	$	15,531	$	33,046	$	72,113	$	10,310,998	$	11,613

Impaired loans included above are as follows:
Non-accrual loans	$	21,061	$	897	$	1,559	$	21,396		23,852	$	44,913			$	21,061	$	897	$	1,559	$	21,396		23,852	$	44,913
TDRs accruing interest ⁽¹⁾		5,113		151		130		37		318		5,431				5,113		151		130		37		318		5,431
Total impaired	$	26,174	$	1,048	$	1,689	$	21,433	$	24,170	$	50,344			$	26,174	$	1,048	$	1,689	$	21,433	$	24,170	$	50,344

	Nonperforming Loans												Nonperforming Loans
	March 31, 2020						December 31, 2019						September 30, 2020						December 31, 2019
	Unpaid						Unpaid						Unpaid						Unpaid
	Principal		Recorded		Related		Principal		Recorded		Related		Principal		Recorded		Related		Principal		Recorded		Related
(unaudited, in thousands)	Balance (1)		Investment		Allowance		Balance (1)		Investment		Allowance		Balance (1)		Investment		Allowance		Balance (1)		Investment		Allowance
With no related specific allowance recorded:
Commercial real estate:
Land and construction	$	238	$	205	$	—	$	616	$	580	$	—	$	1,047	$	997	$	—	$	616	$	580	$	—
Improved property		8,750		6,772		—		5,097		4,229		—		10,481		8,983		—		5,097		4,229		—
Commercial and industrial		3,973		2,827		—		15,182		14,313		—		3,817		2,832		—		15,182		14,313		—
Residential real estate		23,767		20,987		—		17,753		15,952		—		22,965		20,519		—		17,753		15,952		—
Home equity		7,118		6,012		—		6,523		5,610		—		6,693		5,681		—		6,523		5,610		—
Consumer		541		366		—		546		413		—		604		351		—		546		413		—
Total nonperforming loans without a specific allowance		44,387		37,169		—		45,717		41,097		—		45,607		39,363		—		45,717		41,097		—
With a specific allowance recorded:
Commercial real estate:
Land and construction		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Improved property		2,632		2,632		193		4,207		3,907		93		2,094		2,094		95		4,207		3,907		93
Commercial and industrial		—		—		—		193		191		10		—		—		—		193		191		10
Residential real estate		—		—		—		4,772		4,392		14		—		—		—		4,772		4,392		14
Home equity		—		—		—		724		704		6		—		—		—		724		704		6
Consumer		—		—		—		104		53		1		—		—		—		104		53		1
Total nonperforming loans with a specific allowance		2,632		2,632		193		10,000		9,247		124		2,094		2,094		95		10,000		9,247		124
Total nonperforming loans	$	47,019	$	39,801	$	193	$	55,717	$	50,344	$	124	$	47,701	$	41,457	$	95	$	55,717	$	50,344	$	124

	Nonperforming Loans								Nonperforming Loans
	For the Three Months Ended								For the Three Months Ended									For the Nine Months Ended
	March 31, 2020				March 31, 2019				September 30, 2020					September 30, 2019				September 30, 2020				September 30, 2019
	Average		Interest		Average		Interest		Average		Interest			Average		Interest		Average		Interest		Average		Interest
	Recorded		Income		Recorded		Income		Recorded		Income			Recorded		Income		Recorded		Income		Recorded		Income
(unaudited, in thousands)	Investment		Recognized		Investment		Recognized		Investment		Recognized			Investment		Recognized		Investment		Recognized		Investment		Recognized
With no related specific allowance recorded:
Commercial real estate:
Land and construction	$	393	$	—	$	143	$	—	$	801	$	—		$	425	$	—	$	597	$	—	$	284	$	—
Improved property		5,501		20		8,277		—		8,454		16			7,647		—		6,977		51		7,962		—
Commercial and industrial		8,570		3		3,246		—		2,864		(1	)		2,614		—		5,717		5		2,931		—
Residential real estate		18,470		55		13,774		—		20,307		38			12,600		—		19,388		136		13,752		—
Home equity		5,811		6		4,780		—		5,849		4			4,740		—		5,830		16		4,760		—
Consumer		390		1		450		—		372		1			334		—		381		2		425		—
Total nonperforming loans without a specific allowance		39,135		85		30,670		—		38,647		58			28,360		—		38,890		210		30,114		—
With a specific allowance recorded:
Commercial real estate:
Land and construction		—		—		—		—		—		—			—		—				—		—		—
Improved property		3,270		—		1,067		14		2,363		—			5,273		35		2,816		—		3,170		63
Commercial and industrial		96		—		154		3		—		—			189		4		48		—		171		11
Residential real estate		2,196		—		2,539		58		—		—			4,792		51		1,098		—		3,666		169
Home equity		352		—		398		8		—		—			834		8		176		—		616		23
Consumer		27		—		52		1		—		—			68		1		13		—		60		3
Total nonperforming loans with a specific allowance		5,941		—		4,210		84		2,363		—			11,156		99		4,151		—		7,683		269
Total nonperforming loans	$	45,076	$	85	$	34,880	$	84	$	41,010	$	58		$	39,516	$	99	$	43,041	$	210	$	37,797	$	269

The following tables present the recorded investment in non-accrual loans and TDRs:

	Non-accrual Loans ⁽¹⁾				Non-accrual Loans ⁽¹⁾
	March 31,		December 31,		September 30,		December 31,
(unaudited, in thousands)	2020		2019		2020		2019
Commercial real estate:
Land and construction	$	205	$	580	$	997	$	580
Improved property		8,151		6,815		10,410		6,815
Total commercial real estate		8,356		7,395		11,407		7,395
Commercial and industrial		2,655		14,313		2,716		14,313
Residential real estate		17,376		16,867		17,492		16,867
Home equity		5,643		5,903		5,327		5,903
Consumer		337		435		324		435
Total	$	34,367	$	44,913	$	37,266	$	44,913

	TDRs												TDRs
	March 31, 2020						December 31, 2019						September 30, 2020						December 31, 2019
(unaudited, in thousands)	Accruing		Non-Accrual		Total		Accruing		Non-Accrual		Total		Accruing		Non-Accrual		Total		Accruing		Non-Accrual		Total
Commercial real estate:
Land and construction	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Improved property		1,253		180		1,433		1,321		191		1,512		667		174		841		1,321		191		1,512
Total commercial real estate		1,253		180		1,433		1,321		191		1,512		667		174		841		1,321		191		1,512
Commercial and industrial		172		13		185		191		—		191		116		—		116		191		—		191
Residential real estate		3,611		1,055		4,666		3,477		909		4,386		3,027		1,311		4,338		3,477		909		4,386
Home equity		369		311		680		411		293		704		354		324		678		411		293		704
Consumer		29		12		41		31		29		60		27		9		36		31		29		60
Total	$	5,434	$	1,571	$	7,005	$	5,431	$	1,422	$	6,853	$	4,191	$	1,818	$	6,009	$	5,431	$	1,422	$	6,853

As of ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, there were 0 TDRs greater than $1.0 million. The concessions granted in the majority of loans reported as accruing and non-accrual TDRs are extensions of the maturity date or the amortization period, reductions in the interest rate below the prevailing market rate for loans with comparable characteristics, and/or permitting interest-only payments for longer than six months. Wesbanco had unfunded commitments to debtors whose loans were classified as impaired of ~~$0.3~~$0.2 million and $3.3 million as of ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively.

The following tables present details related to loans identified as TDRs during the three and nine months ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively:

	New TDRs (1)												New TDRs (1)
	For the Three Months Ended												For the Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2020						March 31, 2019						September 30, 2020						September 30, 2019
			Pre-		Post-				Pre-		Post-				Pre-		Post-				Pre-		Post-
			Modification		Modification				Modification		Modification				Modification		Modification				Modification		Modification
			Outstanding		Outstanding				Outstanding		Outstanding				Outstanding		Outstanding				Outstanding		Outstanding
	Number of		Recorded		Recorded		Number of		Recorded		Recorded		Number of		Recorded		Recorded		Number of		Recorded		Recorded
(unaudited, dollars in thousands)	Modifications		Investment		Investment		Modifications		Investment		Investment		Modifications		Investment		Investment		Modifications		Investment		Investment
Commercial real estate:
Land and construction		—	$	—	$	—		—	$	—	$	—		—	$	—	$	—		—	$	—	$	—
Improved Property		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		1		605		604
Total commercial real estate		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		1		605		604
Commercial and industrial		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Residential real estate		2		332		330		4		194		192		—		—		—		—		—		—
Home equity		—		—		—		2		187		185		3		31		30		—		—		—
Consumer		—		—		—		2		19		18		—		—		—		—		—		—
Total		2	$	332	$	330		8	$	400	$	395		3	$	31	$	30		1	$	605	$	604

													New TDRs (1)
													For the Nine Months Ended
													September 30, 2020						September 30, 2019
															Pre-		Post-				Pre-		Post-
															Modification		Modification				Modification		Modification
															Outstanding		Outstanding				Outstanding		Outstanding
													Number of		Recorded		Recorded		Number of		Recorded		Recorded
(unaudited, dollars in thousands)													Modifications		Investment		Investment		Modifications		Investment		Investment
Commercial real estate:
Land and construction														—	$	—	$	—		—	$	—	$	—
Improved Property														—		—		—		1		610		604
Total commercial real estate														—		—		—		1		610		604
Commercial and industrial														—		—		—		1		44		37
Residential real estate														2		332		327		4		194		183
Home equity														4		82		77		2		187		184
Consumer														1		8		7		1		15		12
Total														7	$	422	$	411		9	$	1,050	$	1,020

The following table summarizes TDRs which defaulted (defined as past due 90 days) during the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively, that were restructured within the last twelve months prior to ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively:

	Defaulted TDRs ⁽¹⁾								Defaulted TDRs ⁽¹⁾
	For the Three Months Ended								For the Nine Months Ended
	March 31, 2020				March 31, 2019				September 30, 2020				September 30, 2019
	Number of		Recorded		Number of		Recorded		Number of		Recorded		Number of		Recorded
(unaudited, dollars in thousands)	Defaults		Investment		Defaults		Investment		Defaults		Investment		Defaults		Investment
Commercial real estate:
Land and construction		—	$	—		—	$	—		—	$	—		—	$	—
Improved property		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Total commercial real estate		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Commercial and industrial		1		13		—		—		—		—		—		—
Residential real estate		1		155		1		58		1		155		1		96
Home equity		—		—		—		—		—		—		1		100
Consumer		—		—		—		—		—		—		1		12
Total		2	$	168		1	$	58		1	$	155		3	$	208

TDRs that default are placed on non-accrual status unless they are both well-secured and in the process of collection. The loans in the table above were not accruing interest.

22Section 4013 of the CARES Act allows financial institutions the option to temporarily suspend certain requirements under U.S. GAAP related to TDRs for a limited period of time during the COVID-19 pandemic. These customers must meet certain criteria, such as they were in good standing and not more than 30 days past due either as of December 31, 2019, or as of the implementation of the modification program under the Interagency Statement, as well as other requirements noted in the regulatory agencies’ revised statement. Based on this guidance, Wesbanco does not classify the COVID-19 loan modifications as TDRs, nor are the customers considered past due with regards to their delayed payments. Upon exiting the loan modification deferral program, the measurement of loan delinquency will resume where it left off upon entry into the program. Under the CARES Act, Wesbanco has modified approximately 3,553 loans totaling $2.2 billion, of which $0.7 billion remain in their deferral period as of September 30, 2020. Wesbanco offered three to six months of deferred payments to commercial and retail customers impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic depending on the type of loan and the industry for commercial loans.

The following table summarizes amortized cost basis loan balances by year of origination and credit quality indicator:

		Loans As of March 31, 2020																											Loans As of September 30, 2020
		Amortized Cost Basis by Origination Year																											Amortized Cost Basis by Origination Year
(unaudited, in thousands)		2020		2019			2018			2017			2016			Prior			Revolving Loans Amortized Cost Basis			Revolving Loans Converted to Term			Total				2020			2019			2018			2017			2016			Prior			Revolving Loans Amortized Cost Basis			Revolving Loans Converted to Term		Total
Commercial real estate: land and construction	Commercial real estate: land and construction																											Commercial real estate: land and construction
Risk rating:
Pass		$	45,030	$	226,205		$	193,697		$	65,923		$	20,998		$	48,284		$	71,905		$	-		$	672,042			$	94,649		$	300,505		$	147,081		$	45,476		$	19,249		$	34,425		$	23,133		$	—	$	664,518
Criticized - compromised			-		-			42			211			83			1,176			149			-		$	1,661				—			135			2,059			14,320			80			1,717			3,637			—		21,948
Classified - substandard			-		-			871			-			317			1,765			70			-		$	3,023				—			—			806			58			293			2,924			—			—		4,081
Classified - doubtful			-		-			-			-			-			-			-			-		$	-				—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—		—
Total		$	45,030	$	226,205		$	194,610		$	66,134		$	21,398		$	51,225		$	72,124		$	-		$	676,726			$	94,649		$	300,640		$	149,946		$	59,854		$	19,622		$	39,066		$	26,770		$	—	$	690,547
Commercial real estate: land and construction	Commercial real estate: land and construction																											Commercial real estate: land and construction
Current-period net write-offs		$	-	$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-		$	7		$	-		$	-		$	7
Current-period net charge-offs																													$	—		$	—		$	—		$	61		$	(50	)	$	23		$	—		$	—	$	34

Commercial real estate: improved property	Commercial real estate: improved property																											Commercial real estate: improved property
Risk rating:
Pass		$	191,722	$	749,290		$	623,215		$	641,275		$	739,260		$	1,723,158		$	109,941		$	-		$	4,777,861			$	561,381		$	756,494		$	629,690		$	525,306		$	668,523		$	1,468,243		$	127,333		$	—	$	4,736,970
Criticized - compromised			-		2,788			3,995			22,493			12,200			36,321			315			-		$	78,112				—			19,715			9,825			48,237			17,721			101,482			2,050			—		199,030
Classified - substandard			-		71			4,094			7,914			10,549			49,078			-			-		$	71,706				103			136			5,717			10,927			9,991			55,227			—			—		82,101
Classified - doubtful			-		-			-			-			-			-			-			-		$	-				—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—		—
Total		$	191,722	$	752,149		$	631,304		$	671,682		$	762,009		$	1,808,557		$	110,256		$	-		$	4,927,679			$	561,484		$	776,345		$	645,232		$	584,470		$	696,235		$	1,624,952		$	129,383		$	—	$	5,018,101
Commercial real estate: improved property	Commercial real estate: improved property																											Commercial real estate: improved property
Current-period net write-offs		$	-	$	-		$	-		$	12		$	(1,219	)	$	102		$	-		$	-		$	(1,105	)
Current-period net charge-offs																													$	—		$	—		$	—		$	13		$	(1,635	)	$	421		$	—		$	—	$	(1,201	)

Commercial and industrial	Commercial and industrial																											Commercial and industrial
Risk rating:
Pass		$	61,827	$	291,133		$	220,651		$	183,752		$	106,337		$	337,917		$	538,512		$	161		$	1,740,290			$	140,980		$	259,329		$	207,764		$	160,140		$	92,370		$	1,138,827		$	457,987		$	140	$	2,457,537
Criticized - compromised			30		1,789			2,132			2,897			978			10,401			22,801			-		$	41,028				26			2,461			4,273			1,308			459			12,821			5,938			—		27,286
Classified - substandard			-		1,047			1,527			2,173			1,568			7,489			6,629			-		$	20,433				—			3,322			817			3,764			1,368			6,617			6,524			—		22,412
Classified - doubtful			-		-			-			-			-			-			-			-		$	-				—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—		—
Total		$	61,857	$	293,969		$	224,310		$	188,822		$	108,883		$	355,807		$	567,942		$	161		$	1,801,751			$	141,006		$	265,112		$	212,854		$	165,212		$	94,197		$	1,158,265		$	470,449		$	140	$	2,507,235
Commercial and industrial
Current-period net write-offs		$	-	$	-		$	(727	)	$	(170	)	$	(30	)	$	(276	)	$	(1,404	)	$	-		$	(2,607	)
Current-period net charge-offs																													$	—		$	—		$	(1,829	)	$	(159	)	$	(35	)	$	(254	)	$	(200	)	$	—	$	(2,477	)

Residential real estate	Residential real estate																											Residential real estate
Loan delinquency:
Current		$	58,725	$	320,536		$	248,330		$	166,863		$	218,233		$	891,597		$	3,955		$	-		$	1,908,239			$	301,547		$	276,344		$	175,858		$	126,863		$	183,747		$	711,325		$	390		$	—	$	1,776,074
30-59 days past due			-		-			217			-			248			4,944			-			-			5,409				—			—			144			—			—			1,678			—			—		1,822
60-89 days past due			-		-			700			-			109			1,400			-			-			2,209				—			412			—			—			217			2,975			—			—		3,604
90 days or more past due			-		66			240			-			1,172			12,255			-			-			13,733				—			486			784			761			1,117			13,371			—			—		16,519
Total		$	58,725	$	320,602		$	249,487		$	166,863		$	219,762		$	910,196		$	3,955		$	-		$	1,929,590			$	301,547		$	277,242		$	176,786		$	127,624		$	185,081		$	729,349		$	390		$	—	$	1,798,019
Residential real estate
Current-period net write-offs		$	-	$	(24	)	$	(8	)	$	-		$	(19	)	$	(63	)	$	-		$	-		$	(114	)
Current-period net charge-offs																													$	—		$	(24	)	$	(8	)	$	(11	)	$	(151	)	$	(128	)	$	—		$	—	$	(322	)

Home equity	Home equity																											Home equity
Loan delinquency:
Current		$	5,675	$	5,276		$	6,006		$	1,633		$	1,414		$	59,756		$	549,310		$	13,836		$	642,906			$	16,471		$	4,047		$	4,255		$	1,606		$	1,051		$	17,581		$	582,500		$	12,514	$	640,025
30-59 days past due			-		10			-			11			-			933			1,829			56			2,839				—			—			—			—			40			1,300			1,428			238		3,006
60-89 days past due			-		-			-			3			57			305			245			249			859				—			—			11			66			—			192			77			8		354
90 days or more past due			-		-			17			-			89			2,337			940			767			4,150				—			—			34			—			127			1,831			1,046			629		3,667
Total		$	5,675	$	5,286		$	6,023		$	1,647		$	1,560		$	63,331		$	552,324		$	14,908		$	650,754			$	16,471		$	4,047		$	4,300		$	1,672		$	1,218		$	20,904		$	585,051		$	13,389	$	647,052
Home equity
Current-period net write-offs		$	-	$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-		$	60		$	(302	)	$	(29	)	$	(271	)
Current-period net charge-offs																													$	—		$	—		$	—		$	(2	)	$	—		$	(69	)	$	(367	)	$	—	$	(438	)

Consumer	Consumer																											Consumer
Loan delinquency:
Current		$	22,559	$	124,073		$	57,611		$	34,864		$	22,298		$	72,797		$	24,705		$	202		$	359,109			$	61,945		$	100,273		$	45,087		$	26,304		$	15,996		$	52,419		$	23,720		$	181	$	325,925
30-59 days past due			3		271			373			491			290			1,008			6			-			2,442				237			242			117			190		��	58			522			39			—		1,405
60-89 days past due			-		89			193			154			48			201			5			-			690				96			216			92			82			42			217			26			—		771
90 days or more past due			-		185			42			231			77			300			20			-			855				58			74			130			25			8			193			3			—		491
Total		$	22,562	$	124,618		$	58,219		$	35,740		$	22,713		$	74,306		$	24,736		$	202		$	363,096			$	62,336		$	100,805		$	45,426		$	26,601		$	16,104		$	53,351		$	23,788		$	181	$	328,592
Consumer
Current-period net write-offs		$	-	$	(219	)	$	(136	)	$	(76	)	$	(64	)	$	54		$	-		$	-		$	(441	)
Current-period net charge-offs																													$	(78	)	$	(750	)	$	(457	)	$	(410	)	$	(72	)	$	43		$	—		$	—	$	(1,724	)

The following table summarizes other real estate owned and repossessed assets included in other assets:

	March 31,		December 31,		September 30,		December 31,
(unaudited, in thousands)	2020		2019		2020		2019
Other real estate owned	$	1,032	$	4,062	$	730	$	4,062
Repossessed assets		51		116		8		116
Total other real estate owned and repossessed assets	$	1,083	$	4,178	$	738	$	4,178

Residential real estate included in other real estate owned at ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019 was ~~$0.7~~$0.3 million and $0.6 million, respectively. At ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, formal foreclosure proceedings were in process on residential real estate loans totaling ~~$6.6~~$1.1 million and $8.1 million, respectively.

Wesbanco is exposed to certain risks arising from both its business operations and economic conditions. Wesbanco principally manages its exposures to a wide variety of business and operational risks through management of its core business activities. Wesbanco manages economic risks, including interest rate, liquidity, and credit risk, primarily by managing the amount, sources, and duration of its assets and liabilities. Wesbanco’s existing interest rate derivatives result from a service provided to certain qualifying customers and, therefore, are not used to manage interest rate risk in Wesbanco’s assets or liabilities. Wesbanco manages a matched book with respect to its derivative instruments in order to minimize its net risk exposure resulting from such transactions. A matched book is when the Bank’s assets and liabilities are equally distributed but also have similar maturities.

Wesbanco executes interest rate swaps with commercial banking customers to facilitate their respective risk management strategies. Those interest rate swaps are simultaneously hedged by offsetting interest rate swaps that Wesbanco executes with a third party, so that Wesbanco minimizes its net risk exposure resulting from such transactions. As the interest rate swaps associated with this program do not meet the strict hedge accounting requirements of ASC 815, changes in the fair value of both the customer swaps and the offsetting third-party swaps are recognized directly in earnings. As of ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, Wesbanco had 7399 and 65, respectively, customer interest rate swaps with an aggregate notional amount of ~~$535.5~~$610.1 million and $399.9 million, respectively, related to this program. During the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively, Wesbanco recognized net losses of $2.8 million and ~~$0.3~~$1.6 million, respectively, related to the changes in fair value of these swaps. Additionally, Wesbanco recognized ~~$2.6~~$7.0 million and ~~$0.7~~$2.1 million of income for the related swap fees for the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively.

Risk participation agreements are entered into as financial guarantees of performance on interest rate swap derivatives. The purchased asset or sold liability allows Wesbanco to participate-in (fee received) or participate-out (fee paid) the risk associated with certain derivative positions executed by the borrower by the lead bank in a loan syndication. As of September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, Wesbanco had 12 and 10, respectively, risk participation-in agreements with an aggregate notional amount of $101.6 million and $96.5 million, respectively. As of September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, Wesbanco had 1 risk participation-out agreement with an aggregate notional amount of $10.0 million and $7.0 million, respectively.

Certain residential mortgage loans are originated for sale in the secondary mortgage loan market. These loans are classified as held for sale and carried at fair value as Wesbanco has elected the fair value option. Fair value is determined based on rates obtained from the secondary market for loans with similar characteristics. Wesbanco sells loans to the secondary market on either a mandatory or best efforts basis. The loans sold on a mandatory basis are not committed to an investor until the loan is closed with the borrower. Wesbanco enters into forward ~~TBA~~to be announced (“TBA”) contracts to manage the interest rate risk between the loan commitment and the closing of the loan. The total balance of forward TBA contracts entered into was ~~$140.5~~$188.0 million and $50.0 million at ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively. Additionally, Wesbanco recognized losses of ~~$2.7~~$5.5 million and ~~$0.3~~$1.3 million, respectively, for the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020 and ~~March 31,~~ 2019 related to the changes in fair value of these contracts. The loans sold on a best efforts basis are committed to an investor simultaneous to the interest rate commitment with the ~~borrower.~~borrower, and as a result, the Company does not enter into a separate forward TBA contract to offset the fair value risk as the investor accepts such risk in exchange for a lower premium on sale.

All derivatives are carried on the consolidated balance sheet at fair value. Derivative assets are classified in the consolidated balance sheet under other assets, and derivative liabilities are classified in the consolidated balance sheet under other liabilities. Changes in fair value are recognized in earnings. None of Wesbanco’s derivatives isare designated in a qualifying hedging relationship under ASC 815.

The table below presents the fair value of Wesbanco’s derivative financial instruments as well as their classification on the Balance Sheet as of ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019:

	March 31, 2020						December 31, 2019						September 30, 2020						December 31, 2019
(unaudited, in thousands)	Notional or Contractual Amount		Asset Derivatives		Liability Derivatives		Notional or Contractual Amount		Asset Derivatives		Liability Derivatives		Notional or Contractual Amount		Other Asset Derivatives		Other Liability Derivatives		Notional or Contractual Amount		Other Asset Derivatives		Other Liability Derivatives
Derivatives
Loan Swaps:
Interest rate swaps	$	535,467	$	48,182	$	52,464	$	399,860	$	14,585	$	16,117	$	610,062	$	52,837	$	57,201	$	399,860	$	14,585	$	16,117
Other contracts:
Interest rate loan commitments		79,531		—		101		34,236		44		—		121,396		1,237		—		34,236		44		—
Forward TBA contracts		140,500		—		2,320		50,000		—		88		188,000		—		285		50,000		—		88
Total derivatives			$	48,182	$	54,885			$	14,629	$	16,205			$	54,074	$	57,486			$	14,629	$	16,205

The table below presents the change in the fair value of the Company’s derivative financial instruments reflected within ~~the other~~ non-interest income ~~line item of~~on the consolidated income statement for the three and nine months ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively.

		For the Three Months Ended March 31,							For the Three Months Ended September 30,						For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
(unaudited, in thousands)	Location of Gain/(Loss)	2020			2019			Location of Gain/(Loss)	2020			2019			2020			2019
Interest rate swaps	Other income	$	(2,751	)	$	(312	)	Other income	$	420		$	(556	)	$	(2,832	)	$	(1,619	)
Interest rate loan commitments	Mortgage banking income		(145	)		30		Mortgage banking income		48			(66	)		1,193			(133	)
Forward TBA contracts	Mortgage banking income		(2,657	)		(334	)	Mortgage banking income		(1,653	)		(465	)		(5,501	)		(1,317	)
Total		$	(5,553	)	$	(616	)		$	(1,185	)	$	(1,087	)	$	(7,140	)	$	(3,069	)

Wesbanco has agreements with its derivative counterparties that contain a provision, which provides that if Wesbanco defaults on any of its indebtedness, including default where repayment of the indebtedness has not been accelerated by the lender, then Wesbanco could also be declared in default on its derivative obligations.

Wesbanco also has agreements with certain of its derivative counterparties that contain a provision where if Wesbanco fails to maintain its status as either a ~~well~~“well” or ~~adequately capitalized~~“adequately-capitalized” institution, then the counterparty could terminate the derivative positions and Wesbanco would be required to settle its obligations under the agreements.

Wesbanco had minimum collateral posting thresholds with certain of its derivative counterparties and had posted collateral with a market value of ~~$77.7~~$89.8 million as of ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020. If Wesbanco had breached any of these provisions at ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020, it could have been required to settle its obligations under the agreements at the termination value and would have been required to pay any additional amounts due in excess of amounts previously posted as collateral with the respective counterparty.

The following table presents the net periodic pension cost for Wesbanco’s Defined Benefit Pension Plan (the “Plan”) and the related components:

	For the Three Months Ended March 31,						For the Three Months Ended September 30,						For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
(unaudited, in thousands)	2020			2019			2020			2019			2020			2019
Service cost – benefits earned during year	$	568		$	554		$	574		$	567		$	1,710		$	1,681
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation		1,121			1,298			1,133			1,327			3,375			3,938
Expected return on plan assets		(2,594	)		(2,187	)		(2,622	)		(2,235	)		(7,810	)		(6,633	)
Amortization of prior service cost		(9	)		7			(9	)		7			(27	)		20
Amortization of net loss		793			799			802			817			2,389			2,424
Net periodic pension (income) cost	$	(121	)	$	471		$	(122	)	$	483		$	(363	)	$	1,430

The service cost of ~~$0.6~~$1.7 million for both the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020 and 2019 is included in salaries and wages, and the periodic pension income of ~~$0.7~~$2.1 million and $0.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively, is included in employee benefits.

The Plan covers all employees of Wesbanco and its subsidiaries who were hired on or before August 1, 2007 who satisfy minimum age and length of service requirements, and is not available to employees hired after such date.

A minimum required contribution of $5.0 million is due for 2020, which can be offset in whole or in part by the Plan’s $60.9 million available credit balance. Wesbanco currently does 0t expect to make a voluntary contributionto the Plan in ~~2020~~.2020.

Fair value estimates are based on quoted market prices, if available, quoted market prices of similar assets or liabilities, or the present value of expected future cash flows and other valuation techniques. These valuations are significantly affected by discount rates, cash flow assumptions, and risk assumptions used. Therefore, fair value estimates may not be substantiated by comparison to independent markets and are not intended to reflect the proceeds that may be realizable in an immediate settlement of the instruments.

Fair value is determined at one point in time and is not representative of future value. These amounts do not reflect the total value of a going concern organization. Management does not have the intention to dispose of a significant portion of its assets and liabilities, and therefore the unrealized gains or losses should not be interpreted as a forecast of future earnings and cash flows.

The following is a discussion of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis and valuation techniques applied:

Investment securities: The fair value of investment securities which are measured on a recurring basis are determined primarily by obtaining quoted prices on nationally recognized securities exchanges or matrix pricing, which is a mathematical technique used widely in the industry to value debt securities without relying exclusively on quoted prices for the specific securities but rather by relying on the securities’ relationship to other similar securities. These securities are classified within level 1 or 2 in the fair value hierarchy. Positions that are not traded in active markets for which valuations are generated using assumptions not observable in the market or management’s best estimate are classified within level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. This includes certain specific municipal debt issues for which the credit quality and discount rate must be estimated.

Loans held for sale: Loans held for sale are carried, in aggregate, at fair value as Wesbanco previously elected the fair value option. The use of a valuation model using quoted prices of similar instruments are significant inputs in arriving at the fair value and therefore loans held for sale are classified within level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

Derivatives: Wesbanco enters into interest rate swap agreements with qualifying commercial customers to meet their financing, interest rate and other risk management needs. These agreements provide the customer the ability to convert from variable to fixed interest rates. The credit risk associated with derivatives executed with customers is essentially the same as that involved in extending loans and is subject to normal credit policies and monitoring. Those interest rate swaps are economically hedged by offsetting interest rate swaps that Wesbanco executes with derivative counterparties in order to offset its exposure on the fixed components of the customer interest rate swap agreements. The interest rate swap agreement with the loan customer and with the counterparty is reported at fair value in other assets and other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet with any resulting gain or loss recorded in current period earnings as other income and other expense.

Wesbanco enters into forward TBA contracts to manage the interest rate risk between the loan commitments to the customer and the closing of the loan for loans that will be sold on a mandatory basis to secondary market investors. The forward TBA contract is reported at fair value in other assets and other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet with any resulting gain or loss recorded in current period’s earnings as mortgage banking income.

Wesbanco determines the fair value for derivatives using widely accepted valuation techniques including discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of each derivative. This analysis reflects contractual terms of the derivative, including the period to maturity, and uses observable market-based inputs, including interest rate curves and implied volatilities. Wesbanco incorporates credit valuation adjustments to appropriately reflect both its own non-performance risk and the respective counterparty’s non-performance risk in the fair value measurements.

We may be required from time to time to measure certain assets and liabilities at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in accordance with GAAP. These adjustments to fair value usually result from the application of lower of cost or market accounting or write-downs of individual assets and liabilities.

Individually-evaluated nonperforming loans: Individually-evaluated non-performing loans are carried at the amortized cost basis less the specific allowance calculated with the CECL. Since these loans are nonperforming, cash flows could not be estimated and thus are calculated using a cost basis approach or collateral value approach.

Other real estate owned and repossessed assets: Other real estate owned and repossessed assets are carried at the lower of the investment in the assets or the fair value of the assets less estimated selling costs. The use of independent appraisals and management’s best judgment are significant inputs in arriving at the fair value measure of the underlying collateral, and therefore other real estate owned and repossessed assets are classified within level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.

The fair value amounts presented in the table below are intended to permit reconciliation of the fair value hierarchy to the amounts presented in the statement of financial position. The following tables set forth Wesbanco’s financial assets and liabilities that were accounted for at fair value on a recurring and nonrecurring basis by level within the fair value hierarchy as of ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019:

			March 31, 2020								September 30, 2020
			Fair Value Measurements Using:								Fair Value Measurements Using:
	March 31,		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets		Significant Other Observable Inputs		Significant Unobservable Inputs		September 30,		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets		Significant Other Observable Inputs		Significant Unobservable Inputs
(unaudited, in thousands)	2020		(level 1)		(level 2)		(level 3)		2020		(level 1)		(level 2)		(level 3)
Recurring fair value measurements
Equity securities	$	11,230	$	11,230	$	—	$	—	$	12,516	$	12,516	$	—	$	—
Available-for-sale debt securities
U.S. Treasury		21,508		—		21,508		—		19,992		—		19,992		—
U.S. Government sponsored entities and agencies		159,379		—		159,379		—		192,849		—		192,849		—
Residential mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations of government agencies		1,671,469		—		1,671,469		—
Residential mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations of government sponsored entities and agencies										1,421,023		—		1,421,023		—
Commercial mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations of government sponsored entities and agencies		223,827		—		223,827		—		259,610		—		259,610		—
Obligations of state and political subdivisions		141,573		—		139,997		1,576
Obligations of states and political subdivisions										126,539		—		124,891		1,648
Corporate debt securities		44,326		—		44,326		—		25,911		—		25,911		—
Total available-for-sale debt securities	$	2,262,082	$	—	$	2,260,506	$	1,576	$	2,045,924	$	—	$	2,044,276	$	1,648
Loans held for sale		48,021		—		48,021		—		134,151		—		134,151		—
Other assets - interest rate derivatives agreements		48,182		—		48,182		—		52,837		—		52,837		—
Total assets recurring fair value measurements	$	2,369,515	$	11,230	$	2,356,709	$	1,576	$	2,245,428	$	12,516	$	2,231,264	$	1,648

Other liabilities - interest rate derivatives agreements	$	52,464	$	—	$	52,464	$	—	$	57,201	$	—	$	57,201	$	—
Total liabilities recurring fair value measurements	$	52,464	$	—	$	52,464	$	—	$	57,201	$	—	$	57,201	$	—

Nonrecurring fair value measurements
Individually-evaluated nonperforming loans	$	2,439	$	—	$	—	$	2,439	$	1,999	$	—	$	—	$	1,999
Other real estate owned and repossessed assets		1,032		—		—		1,032		738		—		—		738
Total nonrecurring fair value measurements	$	3,471	$	—	$	—	$	3,471	$	2,737	$	—	$	—	$	2,737

			December 31, 2019								December 31, 2019
			Fair Value Measurements Using:								Fair Value Measurements Using:
	December 31,		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets		Significant Other Observable Inputs		Significant Unobservable Inputs		December 31,		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets		Significant Other Observable Inputs		Significant Unobservable Inputs
(in thousands)	2019		(level 1)		(level 2)		(level 3)		2019		(level 1)		(level 2)		(level 3)
Recurring fair value measurements
Equity securities	$	12,343	$	12,343	$	—	$	—	$	12,343	$	12,343	$	—	$	—
Available-for-sale debt securities
U.S. Treasury		32,836		—		32,836		—		32,836		—		32,836		—
U.S. Government sponsored entities and agencies		159,628		—		159,628		—		159,628		—		159,628		—
Residential mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations of government agencies		1,815,987		—		1,815,987		—
Residential mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations of government sponsored entities and agencies										1,815,987		—		1,815,987		—
Commercial mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations of government sponsored entities and agencies		190,409		—		190,409		—		190,409		—		190,409		—
Obligations of state and political subdivisions		145,609		—		144,004		1,605
Obligations of states and political subdivisions										145,609		—		144,004		1,605
Corporate debt securities		49,089		—		49,089		—		49,089		—		49,089		—
Total available-for-sale debt securities	$	2,393,558	$	—	$	2,391,953	$	1,605	$	2,393,558	$	—	$	2,391,953	$	1,605
Loans held for sale		43,013		—		43,013		—		43,013		—		43,013		—
Other assets - interest rate derivatives agreements		14,585		—		14,585		—		14,585		—		14,585		—
Total assets recurring fair value measurements	$	2,463,499	$	12,343	$	2,449,551	$	1,605	$	2,463,499	$	12,343	$	2,449,551	$	1,605

Other liabilities - interest rate derivatives agreements	$	16,117	$	—	$	16,117	$	—	$	16,117	$	—	$	16,117	$	—
Total liabilities recurring fair value measurements	$	16,117	$	—	$	16,117	$	—	$	16,117	$	—	$	16,117	$	—

Nonrecurring fair value measurements
Impaired loans	$	2,362	$	—	$	—	$	2,362	$	2,362	$	—	$	—	$	2,362
Other real estate owned and repossessed assets		4,178		—		—		4,178		4,178		—		—		4,178
Total nonrecurring fair value measurements	$	6,540	$	—	$	—	$	6,540	$	6,540	$	—	$	—	$	6,540

Wesbanco’s policy is to recognize transfers between levels as of the actual date of the event or change in circumstances that caused the transfer. There were 0 significant transfers between level 1, 2 or 3 for the three and nine months ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020 or for the year ended December 31, 2019.

The following table presents additional quantitative information about assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis and for which Wesbanco has utilized level 3 inputs to determine fair value:

Quantitative Information about Level 3 Fair Value Measurements

Fair Value

Valuation

Unobservable

Range (Weighted

Fair Value

Valuation

Unobservable

Range (Weighted

(unaudited, in thousands)

Estimate

Techniques

Input

Average)

Estimate

Techniques

Input

Average)

March 31, 2020

September 30, 2020

Individually-evaluated nonperforming loans

2,439

Appraisal of collateral ⁽¹⁾

Appraisal adjustments ⁽²⁾

—

1,999

Appraisal of collateral ⁽¹⁾

Appraisal adjustments ⁽²⁾

—

Other real estate owned and repossessed assets

1,032

Appraisal of collateral ^{(1), (3)}

Liquidation expenses ⁽²⁾

—

738

Appraisal of collateral ^{(1), (3)}

Liquidation expenses ⁽²⁾

—

December 31, 2019

Impaired loans

2,362

Appraisal of collateral ⁽¹⁾

Appraisal adjustments ⁽²⁾

—

2,362

Appraisal of collateral ⁽¹⁾

Appraisal adjustments ⁽²⁾

—

Other real estate owned and repossessed assets

4,178

Appraisal of collateral ^{(1), (3)}

Liquidation expenses ⁽²⁾

—

4,178

Appraisal of collateral ^{(1), (3)}

Liquidation expenses ⁽²⁾

—

The estimated fair values of Wesbanco’s financial instruments are summarized below:

					Fair Value Measurements at										Fair Value Measurements at
					March 31, 2020										September 30, 2020
	Carrying		Fair Value		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets		Significant Other Observable Inputs		Significant Unobservable Inputs		Carrying		Fair Value		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets		Significant Other Observable Inputs		Significant Unobservable Inputs
(unaudited, in thousands)	Amount		Estimate		(level 1)		(level 2)		(level 3)		Amount		Estimate		(level 1)		(level 2)		(level 3)
Financial Assets
Cash and due from banks	$	593,872	$	593,872	$	593,872	$	—	$	—	$	760,266	$	760,266	$	760,266	$	—	$	—
Equity securities		11,230		11,230		11,230		—		—		12,516		12,516		12,516		—		—
Available-for-sale debt securities		2,262,082		2,262,082		—		2,260,506		1,576		2,045,924		2,045,924		—		2,044,276		1,648
Held-to-maturity debt securities		814,178		841,120		—		840,597		523		746,306		782,401		—		781,906		495
Net loans		10,235,324		10,431,898		—		—		10,431,898		10,804,437		10,863,349		—		—		10,863,349
Loans held for sale		48,021		48,021		—		48,021		—		134,151		134,151		—		134,151		—
Other assets - interest rate derivatives		48,182		48,182		—		48,182		—		52,837		52,837		—		52,837		—
Accrued interest receivable		43,960		43,960		43,960		—		—		65,023		65,023		65,023		—		—

Financial Liabilities
Deposits		11,043,332		11,052,793		9,104,011		1,948,782		—		12,201,425		12,210,444		10,493,913		1,716,531		—
Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings		1,585,608		1,598,550		—		1,598,550		—		794,621		803,811		—		803,811		—
Other borrowings		333,966		334,305		334,305		—		—		381,909		380,269		380,269		—		—
Subordinated debt and junior subordinated debt		192,008		186,404		—		117,046		69,358		192,150		182,753		—		113,496		69,257
Other liabilities - interest rate derivatives		52,464		52,464		—		52,464		—		57,201		57,201		—		57,201		—
Accrued interest payable		7,667		7,667		7,667		—		—		5,014		5,014		5,014		—		—

The following methods and assumptions were used to measure the fair value of financial instruments recorded at cost on Wesbanco’s consolidated balance sheets:

Cash and due from banks: The carrying amount for cash and due from banks is a reasonable estimate of fair value.

Held-to-maturity debt securities: Fair values for debt securities held-to-maturity are determined in the same manner as investment securities, which are described above.

Net loans: Fair values for loans are estimated using a discounted cash flow methodology. The discount rates take into account interest rates currently being offered to customers for loans with similar terms, the credit risk associated with the loan and other market factors, including liquidity. Wesbanco believes the discount rates are consistent with transactions occurring in the marketplace for both performing and distressed loan types. The carrying value is net of the allowance for loan losses and other associated premiums and discounts. Due to the significant judgment involved in evaluating credit quality, loans are classified within level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.

Accrued interest receivable: The carrying amount of accrued interest receivable approximates its fair value.

Deposits: The carrying amount is considered a reasonable estimate of fair value for demand, savings and other variable rate deposit accounts. The fair value of fixed maturity certificates of deposit is estimated by a discounted cash flow method using rates currently offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities.

Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings: The fair value of FHLB borrowings is based on rates currently available to Wesbanco for borrowings with similar terms and remaining maturities.

Other borrowings: The carrying amount of federal funds purchased and overnight sweep accounts generally approximate fair value. Other repurchase agreements are based on quoted market prices if available. If market prices are not available, for certain fixed and adjustable rate repurchase agreements, then quoted market prices of similar instruments are used.

Subordinated debt and junior subordinated debt: The fair value of subordinated debt is estimated using discounted cash flow analyses based on the current borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements. Due to the pooled nature of junior subordinated debt owed to unconsolidated subsidiary trusts, which are not actively traded, estimated fair value is based on recent similar transactions of single-issuer trust preferred securities.

Accrued interest payable: The carrying amount of accrued interest payable approximates its fair value.

Off-balance sheet financial instruments: Off-balance sheet financial instruments consist of commitments to extend credit, including letters of credit. Fair values for commitments to extend credit are estimated using the fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements and the present credit standing of the counterparties. The estimated fair value of the commitments to extend credit and letters of credit are insignificant and therefore are not presented in the above tables.

~~Wesbanco adopted ASU 2014-09 as of January 1, 2018 under the modified retrospective approach with no material impact on Wesbanco’s Consolidated Financial statements.~~ Interest income, net securities gains (losses) and bank-owned life insurance are not in scope of ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. For the revenue streams in scope of ASC 606 - trust fees, service charges on deposits, net securities brokerage revenue, debit card sponsorship income, payment processing fees, electronic banking fees, mortgage banking income and net gain or loss on sale of other real estate owned – there are no significant judgements related to the amount and timing of revenue recognition.

Trust fees: Fees are earned over a period of time between monthly and annually, per the related fee schedule. The fees are earned ratably over the period for investment, safekeeping and other services performed by Wesbanco. The fees are accrued when earned based on the daily asset value on the last day of the quarter. In most cases, the fees are directly debited from the customer account. WesMark fees consist of investment advisory fees and shareholder service fees and are paid to Wesbanco by the WesMark mutual funds on a monthly basis for Wesbanco’s involvement with the management of the funds.

Service charges on deposits: There are monthly service charges for both commercial and personal banking customers, which are earned over the month per the related fee schedule based on the customers’ deposits. There are also transaction-based fees, which are earned based on specific transactions or customer activity within the customers’ deposit accounts. These are earned at the time the transaction or customer activity occurs. The fees are debited from the customer account.

Net securities brokerage revenue: Commission income is earned based on customer transactions and management of investments. The commission income from customers’ transactions is recognized when the transaction is complete and approved. Annuity commissions are earned based upon the carrier’s commission rate for the annuity product chosen by the investing customer. The commission income from the management of investments over time is earned continuously over a quarterly period.

Debit card sponsorship income: Debit card sponsorship income is earned from Wesbanco’s sponsorship of its customers, which include independent service organizations, processors and other banks into different debit networks. For providing this service, the customers pay the bank a per transaction fee for each transaction processed through the network. In some cases, customers are also charged annual sponsorship fees and non-compliance fees as applicable. The fees are earned at the time the transaction or customer activity occurs. The fees are either directly debited from the customers' deposit accounts or are billed to the customer.

Payment processing fees: Payment processing fees are earned from the bill payment and electronic funds transfer (“EFT”) services provided under the name FirstNet. The fees are derived from both the individual consumer banking transactions and from businesses or service providers through monthly billing for total transactions occurring. These fees are earned at the time the transaction or customer activity occurs. The fees are debited from the customers’ deposit accounts or charged directly to the business or service provider.

Electronic banking fees: Interchange and ATM fees are earned based on customer and ATM transactions. Revenue is recognized when the transaction is settled.

Mortgage banking income: Income is earned when Wesbanco-originated loans are sold to an investor on the secondary market. The investor bids on the loans. If the price is accepted, Wesbanco delivers the loan documents to the investor. Once received and approved by the investor, revenue is recognized and the loans are derecognized from the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Prior to the loans being sold, they are classified as loans held for sale. Additionally, the changes in the fair value of the loans held for sale, loan commitments and related derivatives are included in mortgage banking ~~income.~~income and are slightly offset by any deferred direct origination costs, such as mortgage loan officer commissions.

Net gain or loss on sale of other real estate owned: Net gain or loss is recorded when other real estate is sold to a third party and the Bank collects substantially all of the consideration to which Wesbanco is entitled in exchange for the transfer of the property.

The following table summarizes the point of revenue recognition and the income recognized for each of the revenue streams for the three and nine months ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively:

	Point of Revenue	For the Three Months Ended March 31,				Point of Revenue	For the Three Months Ended September 30,					For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
(unaudited, in thousands)	Recognition	2020		2019		Recognition	2020			2019		2020		2019
Revenue Streams
Trust fees
Trust account fees	Over time	$	4,857	$	5,056	Over time	$	4,225		$	4,265	$	13,271	$	13,529
WesMark fees	Over time		2,095		2,059	Over time		2,201			2,160		6,309		6,351
Total trust fees			6,952		7,115			6,426			6,425		19,580		19,880
Service charges on deposits
Commercial banking fees	Over time		585		468	Over time		576			513		1,748		1,480
Personal service charges	At a point in time and over time		6,032		6,081	At a point in time and over time		4,756			6,543		14,524		18,323
Total service charges on deposits			6,617		6,549			5,332			7,056		16,272		19,803
Net securities brokerage revenue
Annuity commissions	At a point in time		1,038		1,362	At a point in time		1,218			1,204		3,101		4,018
Equity and debt security trades	At a point in time		159		102	At a point in time		27			151		280		356
Managed money	Over time		235		157	Over time		248			153		697		484
Trail commissions	Over time		247		239	Over time		232			257		709		739
Total net securities brokerage revenue			1,679		1,860			1,725			1,765		4,787		5,597

Debit card sponsorship income (1)	At a point in time and over time		708		—	At a point in time and over time		751			—		2,102		—
Payment processing fees (1)	At a point in time and over time		680		648	At a point in time and over time		669			709		2,133		2,142
Electronic banking fees	At a point in time		4,254		5,892	At a point in time		4,780			5,253		13,100		18,299
Mortgage banking income	At a point in time		1,276		1,056	At a point in time		8,488			2,588		17,295		5,262
Net gain on other real estate owned and other Assets	At a point in time		169		136
Net (loss) gain on other real estate owned and other assets						At a point in time		(19	)		158		84		670

The activity in accumulated other comprehensive income for the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020 and 2019 is as follows:

	Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income/(Loss)⁽¹⁾												Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income/(Loss)⁽¹⁾
(unaudited, in thousands)	Defined Benefit Plans			Unrealized Gains (Losses) on Debt Securities Available-for-Sale			Unrealized Gains on Debt Securities Transferred from Available-for-Sale to Held-to-Maturity			Total			Defined Benefit Plans			Unrealized Gains (Losses) on Debt Securities Available-for-Sale			Unrealized Gains on Debt Securities Transferred from Available-for-Sale to Held-to-Maturity			Total
Balance at December 31, 2019	$	(17,468	)	$	18,644		$	25		$	1,201		$	(17,468	)	$	18,644		$	25		$	1,201
Other comprehensive income before reclassifications		—			41,116			—			41,116			—			37,340			—			37,340
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss)		569			(1,743	)		(2	)		(1,176	)		1,712			(1,940	)		(12	)		(240	)
Period change		569			39,373			(2	)		39,940			1,712			35,400			(12	)		37,100
Balance at March 31, 2020	$	(16,899	)	$	58,017		$	23		$	41,141
Balance at September 30, 2020													$	(15,756	)	$	54,044		$	13		$	38,301

Balance at December 31, 2018	$	(16,542	)	$	(21,522	)	$	193		$	(37,871	)	$	(16,542	)	$	(21,522	)	$	193		$	(37,871	)
Other comprehensive income before reclassifications		—			19,302			—			19,302			—			46,450			—			46,450
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss)		543			(33	)		(39	)		471			1,721			(199	)		(179	)		1,343
Period change		543			19,269			(39	)		19,773			1,721			46,251			(179	)		47,793
Balance at March 31, 2019	$	(15,999	)	$	(2,253	)	$	154		$	(18,098	)
Balance at September 30, 2019													$	(14,821	)	$	24,729		$	14		$	9,922

The following table provides details about amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income for the three and nine months ended ~~March~~September 30, 2020 and 2019:

Details about Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income/(Loss) Components	For the Three Months Ended March 31,						Affected Line Item in the Statement of Net Income	For the Three Months Ended September 30,						For the Nine Months Ended September 30,						Affected Line Item in the Statement of Net Income
(unaudited, in thousands)	2020			2019				2020			2019			2020			2019
Debt securities available-for-sale ⁽¹⁾:
Net securities gains reclassified into earnings	$	(2,287	)	$	(43	)	Net securities gains (Non-interest income)	$	(45	)	$	(219	)	$	(2,545	)	$	(258	)	Net securities gains (Non-interest income)
Related income tax expense ⁽²⁾		544			10		Provision for income taxes
Related income tax expense ⁽²⁾									11			50			605			59		Provision for income taxes
Net effect on accumulated other comprehensive income for the period		(1,743	)		(33	)			(34	)		(169	)		(1,940	)		(199	)

Debt securities held-to-maturity ⁽¹⁾:
Amortization of unrealized gain transferred from available-for-sale		(3	)		(55	)	Interest and dividends on securities (Interest and dividend income)		(5	)		(88	)		(15	)		(237	)	Interest and dividends on securities (Interest and dividend income)
Related income tax expense ⁽²⁾		1			16		Provision for income taxes
Related income tax expense ⁽²⁾									1			20			3			58		Provision for income taxes
Net effect on accumulated other comprehensive income for the period		(2	)		(39	)			(4	)		(68	)		(12	)		(179	)

Defined benefit plans ⁽³⁾:
Amortization of net loss and prior service costs		746			750		Employee benefits (Non-interest expense)		746			767			2,246			2,275		Employee benefits (Non-interest expense)
Related income tax benefit ⁽²⁾		(177	)		(207	)	Provision for income taxes
Related income tax benefit ⁽²⁾									(177	)		(175	)		(534	)		(554	)	Provision for income taxes
Net effect on accumulated other comprehensive income for the period		569			543				569			592			1,712			1,721
Total reclassifications for the period	$	(1,176	)	$	471			$	531		$	355		$	(240	)	$	1,343

Commitments — In the normal course of business, Wesbanco offers off-balance sheet credit arrangements to enable its customers to meet their financing objectives. Those instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the financial statements. Wesbanco’s exposure to credit losses in the event of non-performance by the other parties to the financial instruments for commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit is limited to the contractual amount of those instruments. Wesbanco uses the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as for all other lending. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. The allowance for credit losses associated with commitments was ~~$5.6~~$10.8 millionas of September 30, 2020 (calculated under the CECL methodology – see Footnote 5, “Loans and the Allowance for Credit Losses”) and $0.9 million ~~as of March 31, 2020 and~~at December 31, 2019, respectively, and is included in other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by banks to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. Those guarantees are primarily issued to support public and private borrowing arrangements, including normal business activities, bond financing and similar transactions. Letters of credit are considered guarantees. The liability associated with letters of credit was $0.2 million as of ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019.

Contingent obligations to purchase loans funded by other entities include affordable housing plan guarantees, credit card guarantees, loans sold with recourse as well as obligations to the FHLB. Affordable housing plan guarantees are performance guarantees for various building project loans. The guarantee amortizes as the loan balances decrease. Credit card guarantees are credit card balances not owned by Wesbanco, whereby the Bank guarantees the performance of the cardholder.

The following table presents total commitments to extend credit, guarantees and various letters of credit outstanding:

	March 31,		December 31,		September 30,		December 31,
(unaudited, in thousands)	2020		2019		2020		2019
Lines of credit	$	2,418,066	$	2,469,676	$	2,512,397	$	2,469,676
Loans approved but not closed		541,038		504,623		422,328		504,623
Overdraft limits		154,481		149,519		154,666		149,519
Letters of credit		59,272		57,205		52,070		57,205
Contingent obligations and other guarantees		76,170		81,551		133,069		81,551

Contingent Liabilities — Wesbanco is a party to various legal and administrative proceedings and claims. While any litigation contains an element of uncertainty, management does not believe that a material loss related to such proceedings or claims pending or known to be threatened is reasonably possible.

Wesbanco operates 2 reportable segments: community banking and trust and investment services. Wesbanco’s community banking segment offers services traditionally offered by full-service commercial banks, including commercial demand, individual demand and time deposit accounts, as well as commercial, mortgage and individual installment loans, and certain non-traditional offerings, such as insurance and securities brokerage services. The trust and investment services segment offers trust services as well as various alternative investment products including mutual funds. The market value of assets managed or held in custody by the trust and investment services segment was approximately ~~$4.0~~$4.6 billion and ~~$4.5~~$4.4 billion at ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively. These assets are held by Wesbanco in fiduciary or agency capacities for their customers and therefore are not included as assets on Wesbanco’s Consolidated Balance Sheets.

			Trust and						Trust and
	Community		Investment				Community		Investment
(unaudited, in thousands)	Banking		Services		Consolidated		Banking		Services		Consolidated
For The Three Months Ended March 31, 2020
For The Three Months Ended September 30, 2020
Interest and dividend income	$	142,448	$	—	$	142,448	$	133,657	$	—	$	133,657
Interest expense		22,286		—		22,286		13,064		—		13,064
Net interest income		120,162		—		120,162		120,593		—		120,593
Provision for credit losses		29,821		—		29,821		16,288		—		16,288
Net interest income after provision for credit losses		90,341		—		90,341		104,305		—		104,305
Non-interest income		21,057		6,952		28,009		28,186		6,426		34,612
Non-interest expense		86,918		4,415		91,333		86,011		3,932		89,943
Income before provision for income taxes		24,480		2,537		27,017		46,480		2,494		48,974
Provision for income taxes		3,088		533		3,621		7,145		524		7,669
Net income	$	21,392	$	2,004	$	23,396	$	39,335	$	1,970	$	41,305

For The Three Months Ended March 31, 2019
For The Three Months Ended September 30, 2019
Interest and dividend income	$	119,053	$	—	$	119,053	$	117,348	$	—	$	117,348
Interest expense		20,692		—		20,692		21,228		—		21,228
Net interest income		98,361		—		98,361		96,120		—		96,120
Provision for credit losses		2,507		—		2,507		4,121		—		4,121
Net interest income after provision for credit losses		95,854		—		95,854		91,999		—		91,999
Non-interest income		20,658		7,115		27,773		20,525		6,425		26,950
Non-interest expense		70,275		4,157		74,432		69,068		4,200		73,268
Income before provision for income taxes		46,237		2,958		49,195		43,456		2,225		45,681
Provision for income taxes		8,237		621		8,858		7,866		468		8,334
Net income	$	38,000	$	2,337	$	40,337	$	35,590	$	1,757	$	37,347

For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2020
Interest and dividend income							$	410,799	$	—	$	410,799
Interest expense								51,031		—		51,031
Net interest income								359,768		—		359,768
Provision for credit losses								107,949		—		107,949
Net interest income after provision for credit losses								251,819		—		251,819
Non-interest income								75,901		19,580		95,481
Non-interest expense								254,517		12,262		266,779
Income before provision for income taxes								73,203		7,318		80,521
Provision for income taxes								9,795		1,537		11,332
Net income							$	63,408	$	5,781	$	69,189

For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019
Interest and dividend income							$	355,944	$	—	$	355,944
Interest expense								63,003		—		63,003
Net interest income								292,941		—		292,941
Provision for credit losses								9,375		—		9,375
Net interest income after provision for credit losses								283,566		—		283,566
Non-interest income								65,998		19,880		85,878
Non-interest expense								207,299		12,353		219,652
Income before provision for income taxes								142,265		7,527		149,792
Provision for income taxes								25,714		1,581		27,295
Net income							$	116,551	$	5,946	$	122,497

Total non-fiduciary assets of the trust and investment services segment were ~~$3.8~~$4.2 million (including ~~$2.2~~$2.3 million of trust customer intangibles) and ~~$4.1~~$4.0 million (including ~~$2.4~~$2.5 million of trust customer intangibles) at ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively. All other assets, including goodwill and the remainder of other intangible assets, were allocated to the Community Banking segment.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Management’s Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”) represents an overview of the results of operations and financial condition of Wesbanco for the three and nine months ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020. This discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto.

Forward-looking statements in this report relating to Wesbanco’s plans, strategies, objectives, expectations, intentions and adequacy of resources, are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The information contained in this report should be read in conjunction with Wesbanco’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019 and documents subsequently filed by Wesbanco with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), including Wesbanco’s Form 10-Q for the quarters ended March 31 and June 30, 2020, which are available at the SEC’s website, www.sec.gov or at Wesbanco’s website, www.Wesbanco.com. Investors are cautioned that forward-looking statements, which are not historical fact, involve risks and uncertainties, including those detailed in Wesbanco’s most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC under “Risk Factors” in Part I, Item 1A and under “Risk Factors” in Part II, Item 1A of ~~this~~Wesbanco’s March 31 and June 30, 2020 Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Such statements are subject to important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contemplated by such statements, including, without limitation, the effects of changing regional and national economic conditions including the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic; changes in interest rates, spreads on earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, and associated interest rate sensitivity; sources of liquidity available to Wesbanco and its related subsidiary operations; potential future credit losses and the credit risk of commercial, real estate, and consumer loan customers and their borrowing activities; actions of the Federal Reserve Board, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the SEC, the Financial Institution Regulatory Authority, the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board, the Securities Investors Protection Corporation, and other regulatory bodies; potential legislative and federal and state regulatory actions and reform, including, without limitation, the impact of the implementation of the Dodd-Frank Act; adverse decisions of federal and state courts; fraud, scams and schemes of third parties; cyber-security breaches; competitive conditions in the financial services industry; rapidly changing technology affecting financial services; marketability of debt instruments and corresponding impact on fair value adjustments; and/or other external developments materially impacting Wesbanco’s operational and financial performance. Wesbanco does not assume any duty to update forward-looking statements.

Wesbanco is a multi-state bank holding company operating through ~~236~~235 branches and ~~228~~227 ATM machines in West Virginia, Ohio, western Pennsylvania, Kentucky, southern Indiana and Maryland, offering retail banking, corporate banking, personal and corporate trust services, brokerage services, mortgage banking and insurance. Wesbanco’s businesses are significantly impacted by economic factors such as market interest rates, federal monetary and regulatory policies, local and regional economic conditions and the competitive environment’s effect upon Wesbanco’s business volumes. Wesbanco’s deposit levels are affected by numerous factors including personal savings rates, personal income, and competitive rates on alternative investments, as well as competition from other financial institutions within the markets we serve and liquidity needs of Wesbanco. Loan levels are also subject to various factors including construction demand, business financing needs, consumer spending and interest rates, as well as loan terms offered by competing lenders.

Wesbanco’s critical accounting policies involving the significant judgments and assumptions used in the preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements as of ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020 have remained unchanged, except as noted below, from the disclosures presented in Wesbanco’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019 within the section “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”

Allowance for Credit Losses— In September 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, “Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326),” which require entities to use a new forward-looking “expected loss” model also referred to as the current expected credit loss model (“CECL”) on trade and other receivables, held-to-maturity debt securities, loans and other instruments that generally will result in the earlier recognition of allowances for credit losses. For available-for-sale debt securities with unrealized losses, entities measure credit losses in a manner similarly to current procedures, except that the losses will be recognized as allowances rather than reductions in the amortized cost of the securities. Entities will have to disclose significantly more information, including information they use to track credit quality by year of origination for most financing receivables. In April 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-04, “Codification Improvements to Topic 326, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses, Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging and Topic 825, Financial Instruments” and in May 2019 the FASB issued ASU 2019-05, “Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326), Targeted Transition Relief. Public business entities must apply the new requirements for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years, which for Wesbanco was effective January 1, 2020. In December 2018, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) and the Office of Comptroller of the Currency (“OCC”) approved a final rule to address changes to credit loss accounting under GAAP, including banking organizations’ adoption of the CECL methodology. The final rule provides banking organizations the option to phase-in, over a three-year period, the day-one adverse effects on regulatory capital that may result from the adoption of the new accounting standard. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the joint federal bank regulatory agencies issued an optional extension of the regulatory capital transition, which allows for a two-year delay and then a three-year transition period from January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2024. Under the interim final rule, the amount of adjustments to regulatory capital deferred until the phase-in period includes both the initial impact of our adoption of CECL at January 1, 2020 and 25% of subsequent changes in our allowance for credit losses during each quarter of the two-year period ended December 31, 2021, (collectively, the “CECL regulatory capital transition adjustment”). Wesbanco has elected to defer the impact of CECL on its regulatory capital for two years and then will ~~phase in~~phase-in the impact of the adoption of this standard on the ~~company’s~~ regulatory capital calculations over the subsequent three-year period.

Under CECL, acquired loans or pools of loans that have experienced more-than-insignificant credit deterioration are deemed to be purchased ~~credit deteriorated~~credit-deteriorated (“PCD”) loans, and are grossed-up on day 1 by the initial credit estimate through the allowance as opposed to a reduction in the loan’s amortized cost. The credit mark on acquired loans deemed not to be PCD loans are reflected as a reduction in the loan’s amortized cost, with an allowance and corresponding provision for credit losses recorded in the first reporting period after acquisition through current period earnings, while the loan mark will accrete through interest income over the life of such loans. At acquisition, Wesbanco will consider several factors as indicators that an acquired loan or pool of loans has experienced more-than-insignificant credit deterioration. These factors may include loans 30 days or more past due, loans with an internal risk grade of below average or lower, loans classified as non-accrual by the acquired institution, ~~the~~ materiality of the credit and loans that have been previously modified in a troubled debt restructuring (“TDR”). Upon adoption of this standard, acquired loans from prior acquisitions that ~~met~~meet the guidelines under ASC 310-30 (formerly known as “purchased ~~credit impaired”~~credit-impaired”) were reclassified as PCD loans. The accretable portion of the loan mark as of adoption date continues to accrete into interest income. However, the non-accretable portion of the loan mark was added to the allowance upon adoption, and any reversals of such mark will flow through the allowance in future periods. The loan mark on ASC 310-20 loans (“non-purchased ~~credit impaired”~~credit-impaired”) from prior acquisitions continues to accrete through interest income over the life of such loans.

Wesbanco formed a cross-functional team in 2016 to oversee the implementation of CECL. The team was responsible for completing an initial data gap assessment, determining if additional data was needed or current data could be improved upon, finalizing the loan segmentation procedures, analyzing the methodology options regarding the calculation of expected credit losses and concluding why the selected methodology is reasonable and in-line with accounting guidance. Wesbanco completed parallel runs in 2019 to ensure the various forecasting and modeling assumptions were reasonable and supportable, including certain qualitative factors that were developed to estimate the initial current expected credit loss allowance. Wesbanco engaged a third-party to validate the data inputs and the models utilized in the CECL calculation. In addition, the Company prepared documentation of the accounting policy decisions, changes to the business processes and procedures, and the control environment under the adoption of this standard. The day 1 impact on the allowance for credit losses was ~~an increase of $41.1~~$41.4 million, which included a $6.7 million adjustment for PCD loans and a $3.0 million adjustment related to loan commitments. The after-tax effect on retained earnings was $26.6 million as of January 1, 2020. The day 1 CECL calculation iswas derived from the selected assumption of a one-year reasonable and supportable forecast, which was obtained from a third-party vendor. After the forecast period, Wesbanco reverts back over a ~~one-year~~one year period to historical loss rates adjusting for prepayments and curtailments, to estimate losses over the remaining life of loans. The most sensitive assumptions include the length of the forecast and reversion periods, forecast of unemployment and interest rate spreads and prepayment speeds. See Note 5, “Loans and Allowance for Credit Losses” for further detail.

The allowance for credit losses reduces the loan portfolio to the net amount expected to be collected and establishes an allowance for unfunded loan ~~commitments.~~commitments, which is recorded in other liabilities. The allowance for credit losses represents the lifetime expected losses for all loans and unfunded loan commitments at the initial recognition date. The allowance incorporates forward-looking information and applies a reversion methodology beyond the reasonable and supportable forecast. The allowance is increased by a provision charged to operating expense and reduced by charge-offs, net of recoveries. The provision also includes any necessary adjustments to the reserve for unfunded loan commitments, and such reserve is accounted for in other liabilities. Management evaluates the appropriateness of the allowance at least quarterly. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires material estimates that may be susceptible to significant change from period to period.

The allowance for credit loss calculation is based on the loan’s amortized cost basis, which is comprised of the unpaid principal balance of the loan, deferred loan fees (costs), and acquired premium (discount) ~~less~~minus any write-downs. Wesbanco made an accounting policy election to exclude accrued interest from the measurement of the allowance for credit losses, except for recent loan modifications allowed under the CARES Act due to the timing and nature of these modifications, because the Company has a robust policy in place to reverse or write-off accrued interest when the loan is placed on ~~non-accrual. Wesbanco~~non-accrual, and also made an accounting policy election to reverse accrued interest deemed uncollectible as a reversal of interest income. However, Wesbanco is reserving, as part of the allowance for credit losses, for accrued interest on loan modifications under the CARES Act due to the nature and timing of these deferrals.

The allowance for credit loss reflects the risk of loss in the loan portfolio. To appropriately measure expected credit losses, management disaggregates the loan portfolio into pools of similar risk characteristics. The Company utilizes the probability of default, ~~(“PD”)~~PD, / loss given default, ~~(“LGD”)~~LGD, approach to calculate the expected loss for each segment, which is then ~~discounted.~~discounted to net present value. PD is the probability the asset will default within a given timeframe and LGD is the percentage of the assets not expected to be collected due to default. The primary macroeconomic drivers of the quantitative model include forecasts of national unemployment and interest rate spreads. Management relies on macroeconomic forecasts obtained from various reputable sources, which may include the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) forecast and other third party forecasts from well recognized, leading economists. These forecasts can range from one to two years, depending upon the facts and circumstances of the current state of the economy, portfolio segment and management’s judgement of what can be reasonably supported. The model reversion period may range from one to three years.

The allowance for credit losses is calculated over the loan’s contractual life. For term loans, the contractual life is calculated based on the maturity date. For commercial and industrial (“C&I”) revolving loans with no stated maturity date, the contractual life is calculated based on the internal review date. For all other revolving loans, the contractual life is based on either the estimated maturity date or a default date. The contractual term does not include any expected extensions, renewals or modifications unless management has a reasonable expectation as of the reporting period that Wesbanco will execute a troubled debt restructuring, ~~(“TDR”)~~TDR, with the borrower. Management assumes a loan will become a TDR if a ~~consumer~~ loan has matured, has a principal balance, and has previously been partially charged-off. This assumption extends the maturity of these loans to six months beyond their respective maturity dates.

Commercial loans, including commercial real estate (“CRE”) and C&I, are individually-evaluated if they have unique characteristics, reported as ~~TDR,~~TDRs, or reported as non-accrual loans and greater than $1 ~~million.~~million in balance. Specific reserves are established when appropriate for such loans based on the net present value of expected future cash flows of the loan or the estimated realizable value of the collateral, if any.

On March 27, 2020, the ~~Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security~~CARES Act ~~(“CARES Act”)~~ was signed into law. Section 4013 of the CARES Act, “Temporary Relief From Troubled Debt Restructurings,” allows financial institutions the option to temporarily suspend certain requirements under U.S. GAAP related to TDRs for a limited period of time during the COVID-19 pandemic. On April 7, 2020, the joint federal regulatory agencies issued a statement, “Interagency Statement on Loan Modifications and Reporting for Financial Institutions Working With Customers Affected by the Coronavirus (Revised),” which further discusses loan modifications related to COVID-19. Wesbanco has extended loan principal and/or interest payments up to 180 days for customers ~~whom are~~ affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. These customers must meet certain criteria, such as being in good standing and not more than 30 days past due ~~prior to~~either as of December 31, 2019, or as of the ~~pandemic,~~implementation of the modification program under the Interagency Statement, as well as other requirements noted in the regulatory agencies’ revised statement. Based on the CARES Act provision and the guidance noted above, Wesbanco does not classify the COVID-19 loan modifications as TDRs, nor are the customers considered late with regard to their delayed ~~payments.~~payments to the extent they meet the criteria. Upon exiting the loan modification deferral program, the measurement of loan delinquency will resume where it was determined upon entry into the program.

In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, Wesbanco launched a number of initiatives and precautionary measures intended to mitigate the impact of the COVID-19 virus outbreak by offering payment relief to affected borrowers through loan modifications, payment deferrals, and working capital facilities; adjusting branch operations to help protect the health and safety of our customers and employees while maintaining access to our services; and supporting local non-profit organizations through our grant programs. Through ~~May 4,~~September 30, 2020, we have assisted our residential mortgage customers with ~~565~~approximately 550 loan modifications, ~~totaling $145 million,~~ our consumer and home equity loan customers with ~~753~~approximately 720 loan modifications, ~~totaling $30 million,~~ and our commercial and business customers with ~~more than 1,800~~approximately 2,300 loan modifications, ~~totaling $2.0 billion,~~ including most customers in our hotel loan portfolio. In addition, we have been an active participant in the Small Business Administration’s Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”), as established by the CARES Act. As of September 30, 2020, Wesbanco has originated approximately 7,200 PPP loans for $853 million.

Net income for the three months ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020 was ~~$23.4~~$41.3 million, with diluted earnings per share of ~~$0.35,~~$0.61, compared to ~~$40.3~~$37.3 million ~~and $0.74~~or $0.68 per diluted share, respectively, for the ~~first~~third quarter of 2019. Net income ~~excluding after-tax merger-related expenses~~ for the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020 was ~~$27.5~~$69.2 million, or ~~$0.41~~$1.03 per diluted share, as compared to ~~$42.8~~$122.5 million, or $2.24 per diluted share, for the 2019 period. Excluding after-tax restructuring and ~~$0.78~~merger-related expenses (non-GAAP measure) in both periods, for the three months ended September 30, 2020, net income was $44.2 million, or $0.66 per diluted share, as compared to $38.7 million or $0.71 per diluted share, respectively, in the prior year ~~quarter (non-GAAP measures).~~quarter; and net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2020 was $76.5 million, or $1.14 per diluted share compared to $126.3 million or $2.31 per diluted share, respectively, in the prior year period.

	For The Three Months Ended March 31,												For The Three Months Ended September 30,												For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2020						2019						2020						2019						2020						2019
(unaudited, dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)	Net Income			Diluted Earnings Per Share			Net Income			Diluted Earnings Per Share			Net Income			Diluted Earnings Per Share			Net Income			Diluted Earnings Per Share			Net Income			Diluted Earnings Per Share			Net Income			Diluted Earnings Per Share
Net income (Non-GAAP)⁽¹⁾	$	27,476		$	0.41		$	42,791		$	0.78		$	44,155		$	0.66		$	38,681		$	0.71		$	76,489		$	1.14		$	126,349		$	2.31
Less: After tax merger-related expenses		(4,080	)		(0.06	)		(2,454	)		(0.04	)
Less: After-tax restructuring and merger-related expenses														(2,850	)		(0.05	)		(1,334	)		(0.03	)		(7,300	)		(0.11	)		(3,852	)		(0.07	)
Net income (GAAP)	$	23,396		$	0.35		$	40,337		$	0.74		$	41,305		$	0.61		$	37,347		$	0.68		$	69,189		$	1.03		$	122,497		$	2.24

Net interest income increased ~~$21.8~~$24.5 million or ~~22.2%~~25.5% in the ~~first~~third quarter of 2020 compared to the same quarter of 2019 due to a ~~26.0%~~34.8% increase in average total earning assets, due primarily to the OLBK ~~acquisition.~~acquisition and related accretion from purchase accounting. As a result of five federal funds rate decreases totaling 225 basis points from July 2019 to March 2020 and aggressive deposit rate reductions late in the first quarter of 2020, the yield on earning assets decreased a total of 2668 basis points and the cost of interest bearing liabilities decreased 1556 basis points from the ~~first~~ third

quarter of 2019 to the same period of 2020. This resulted in the net interest margin decreasing by 1425 basis points to ~~3.54%~~3.31% in the ~~first~~third quarter of 2020 compared to ~~3.68%~~3.56% in the ~~first~~third quarter of 2019. Average loan balances increased by ~~35.5%~~43.3% from the ~~first~~third quarter of 2019, mainly attributable to both the OLBK acquisition and participation in the PPP loan program, while average deposits increased ~~by 24.6%, both mainly attributable to~~40.3% over the ~~OLBK acquisition.~~ same time period. ~~Lastly, accretion~~Accretion from acquisitions benefited the ~~first~~third quarter net interest margin by 2218 basis points, as compared to 1913 basis points in the prior year period and 2219 basis points during the ~~fourth~~second quarter of ~~2019.~~2020. Lastly, the funding of PPP loans positively impacted the third quarter 2020 net interest margin by a net two basis points.

The provision for credit losses increased to ~~$29.8~~$16.3 million in the ~~first~~third quarter of 2020 as compared to the third quarter of 2019, due specifically to the implementation of the CECL accounting standard on January 1, 2020, and the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic. Net charge-offs, as a percentage of average portfolio loans, were ~~0.18%~~0.00% and ~~0.07%~~0.04% for the ~~first~~third quarter of 2020 and 2019, respectively.

For the ~~first~~third quarter of 2020, non-interest income increased ~~$0.2~~$7.7 million or ~~0.8%~~28.4% compared to the ~~first~~third quarter of 2019, driven by ~~debit sponsorship~~mortgage banking income and ~~net securities gains. Debit sponsorship~~higher commercial customer loan swap-related income, ~~a new source of fee~~as well as the OLBK acquisition. Reflecting the low interest rate environment and organic growth, mortgage banking income ~~acquired~~increased $5.9 million or 228.0% in the ~~OLBK acquisition in November 2019, totaled $0.7 million for the first~~third quarter of ~~2020. Net securities gains~~2020 compared to the prior year period, as residential mortgage origination dollar volume doubled with the associated sale of approximately 75% of those originations into the secondary market. Loan swap-related income increased ~~$0.8~~$1.7 million or 437.5% from the third quarter of 2019 to $1.3 million, due to ~~a large sale of securities~~commercial loan customer demand in ~~March 2020 in order to create available cash for potential COVID-19 needs.~~the current rate environment. Offsetting these increases somewhat, electronic banking fees decreased ~~$1.6~~$0.5 million or ~~27.8%~~9.0% due to ~~a negative $2.7 million impact of~~the limitation on interchange fees due to the Durbin amendment toin the 2010 Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection ~~Act. Swap fee-related income also~~Act, and service charges on deposits decreased ~~$0.5~~$1.7 million ~~for the first quarter of 2020 compared to the first quarter in 2019,~~or 24.4% due to ~~the decline in the fair value of existing swaps resulting from~~higher customer deposits associated with CARES Act stimulus payments and lower ~~rates and the inverted yield curve during 2020.~~general consumer spending.

Non-interest expense, excluding restructuring and merger-related expenses in both periods, increased in the ~~first~~third quarter of 2020 by $14.8 million or ~~20.8%~~20.6%, compared to the ~~first~~third quarter of 2019. This year-over-year increase is primarily due to higher salaries and wages, employee benefits, net occupancy, equipment, and other operating costs associated with additional staffing and financial center locations from the OLBK acquisition. In addition, salaries and wages reflect the annual mid-year merit increases implemented ~~last~~during the summer. For the ~~first~~third quarter of 2020, restructuring and merger-related expenses were ~~$5.2~~$3.6 million, which related to Wesbanco’s previously announced financial center optimization strategy and the OLBK merger, as compared to ~~$3.1~~$1.7 million for the ~~first~~third quarter of 2019, which were related to the ~~FFKT~~OLBK merger.

During the ~~first~~third quarter, the effective tax rate was ~~13.4%~~15.7% as compared to ~~18.0%~~18.2% last year, and the provision for income taxes decreased ~~$5.2~~$0.7 million to ~~$3.6~~$7.7 million, primarily due to lower year-over-year pre-tax income.

In response to the current economic environment as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, Wesbanco completed an interim goodwill impairment analysis as of ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020. Wesbanco concluded that goodwill, which has a carrying value of $1.1 billion, was not impaired as of ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020. ~~If events and circumstances continue, such as the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic,~~ Wesbanco will ~~continue to quarterly assess~~conduct its annual goodwill ~~for potential impairment.~~impairment test in the fourth quarter as of November 30^th.

	For the Three Months Ended March 31,						For the Three Months Ended September 30,						For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
(unaudited, dollars in thousands)	2020			2019			2020			2019			2020			2019
Net interest income	$	120,162		$	98,361		$	120,593		$	96,120		$	359,768		$	292,941
Taxable equivalent adjustment to net interest income		1,184			1,473			1,112			1,265			3,440			4,105
Net interest income, fully taxable equivalent	$	121,346		$	99,834		$	121,705		$	97,385		$	363,208		$	297,046
Net interest spread, non-taxable equivalent		3.25	%		3.34	%		3.10	%		3.20	%		3.14	%		3.29	%
Benefit of net non-interest bearing liabilities		0.26	%		0.29	%		0.18	%		0.31	%		0.21	%		0.30	%
Net interest margin		3.51	%		3.63	%		3.28	%		3.51	%		3.35	%		3.59	%
Taxable equivalent adjustment		0.03	%		0.05	%		0.03	%		0.05	%		0.03	%		0.05	%
Net interest margin, fully taxable equivalent		3.54	%		3.68	%		3.31	%		3.56	%		3.38	%		3.64	%

Net interest income, which is Wesbanco’s largest source of revenue, is the difference between interest income on earning assets, primarily loans and securities, and interest expense on liabilities, primarily deposits and short and long-term borrowings. Net interest income is affected by the general level of, and changes in interest rates, the steepness and shape of the yield curve, changes in the amount and composition of interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities, as well as the frequency of repricing of existing assets and liabilities. Net interest income increased ~~$21.8~~$24.5 million or ~~22.2%~~25.5% in the ~~first~~third quarter of 2020 compared to the ~~first~~third quarter of 2019, due to a ~~26.0%~~34.8% increase in average earning asset balances, primarily driven by the acquisition of OLBK, which closed midway through the fourth quarter of ~~2019.~~2019, and Wesbanco’s participation in the PPP lending program. For the first nine months of 2020, net interest income increased $66.8 million or 22.8% from the first nine months of 2019, for the same reasons. Average loan balances increased ~~35.5%~~43.3% in the ~~first~~third quarter of 2020 primarily from the acquisition of OLBK and from $853.1 million of PPP loans originated primarily in the second quarter of 2020, compared to the ~~first~~third quarter of 2019. PPP loans contributed a total of $7.8 million in interest and fee accretion income in the third quarter of 2020, and $11.5 million for the first nine months of 2020. Excluding the OLBK acquisition and PPP loans, portfolio loans ~~increased~~decreased by ~~2.6%~~0.3% from ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2019, as growth ~~occurred~~remained generally flat from a relative lack of new loan demand, other than residential lending, most of which was sold in the commercial real estate, commercial and industrial, and residential real estate categories. Overall loan growth was boosted in the first quarter of 2020 due to lower loan rates and prepayments, and fewer loans going to the secondary market. Total average deposits increased in the ~~first~~third quarter of 2020 by ~~$2.2~~$3.5 billion or ~~24.6%~~40.3% compared to the ~~first~~third quarter of 2019, due to the deposits acquired from ~~OLBK.~~OLBK and from an influx of deposits from the stimulus package associated with the CARES Act, PPP loan proceeds deposited into customer accounts, higher personal savings rates and lower general consumer spending. The net interest margin decreased by 1425 basis points to ~~3.54%~~3.31% in the ~~first~~third quarter of 2020 from the same quarter of 2019. The margin’s decline was due to multiple decreases during late 2019 and the first quarter of 2020 in the Federal Reserve’s target federal funds rate, ~~and~~ a flat to sometimes inverted yield curve and additional balance sheet liquidity over the last three quarters, and was partially offset by higher

purchase accounting accretion. Approximately 2218 basis points of accretion from OLBK and other prior acquisitions was included in the ~~first~~third quarter 2020 net interest margin compared to 1913 basis points in the 2019 ~~first~~third quarter net interest margin. The funding of the previously mentioned PPP loans positively impacted the third quarter of 2020 net interest margin by a net two basis points. Yields decreased for most earning asset categories in 2020. The cost of interest bearing deposits decreased by 45 basis points and total liabilities decreased by 1556 basis points from the ~~first~~third quarter of 2019 to the ~~first~~third quarter of 2020. The decrease in the cost is primarily due to aggressive rate decreases for interest bearing demand deposits, which include public funds, and lower rates for certificates of deposit, customer repurchase agreements, short to medium-term Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings and junior subordinated debentures in response to the general decrease in overall borrowing rates in the marketplace resulting from lower rates across the yield curve.

Interest income increased ~~$23.4~~$16.3 million or ~~19.7%~~13.9% in the third quarter of 2020 and $54.9 million or 15.4% in the first ~~quarter~~nine months of 2020 compared to the same ~~period~~periods of 2019 due to higher overall earning assets, mostly attributable to the OLBK acquisition and PPP loan originations, partially offset by lower yields in almost every major earning asset category. Earning asset yields were influenced negatively ~~by COVID-19~~ in the ~~first~~third quarter of 2020 compared to the ~~first~~third quarter of ~~2019. In March,~~2019 due primarily to the Federal ~~Reserve dropped~~Reserve’s drop of the federal ~~fund~~funds rate by 150 basis points in March 2020, in addition to the 75 basis points that occurred in the last half of 2019. Average loan balances increased ~~$2.7~~$3.4 billion ~~or 35.5%~~ in the ~~first~~third quarter of 2020 compared to the ~~first~~third quarter of 2019, due primarily to the acquisition of ~~OLBK.~~OLBK and originations of PPP loans. Loan yields decreased by 4371 basis points during this same period to ~~4.63%~~4.17% from the previously mentioned federal funds rate ~~decreases.~~decreases and lower yields on PPP loans. Loans provide the greatest impact on interest income and the yield on earning assets as they have the largest balance and the highest yield within major earning asset categories. In the ~~first~~third quarter of 2020, average loans represented ~~75.2%~~75.8% of average earning assets, an increase from ~~69.9%~~71.4% in the ~~first~~third quarter of 2019. Average taxable securities balances ~~increased $222.8~~decreased $180.2 million or ~~9.5%~~7.8% from the ~~first~~third quarter of 2019, due ~~partially~~ to ~~the securities acquired in the OLBK acquisition, net~~higher levels of ~~sales,~~calls and ~~purchases in 2020. Not reflected in the current quarter’s average balance was~~mortgage security-related paydowns, as well as the sale of approximately $218 million of mortgage-backed securities at the end of the first quarter, to take advantage of market opportunities and to create liquidity for COVID-19 related reasons. Taxable securities yields decreased by 1957 basis points and tax-exempt securities yields ~~increased~~decreased by ~~five~~three basis points in the ~~first~~third quarter of 2020 from the ~~first~~third quarter of 2019. The recent flat and inverted yield curve ~~have~~has resulted in the yield decrease for ~~taxable~~all securities, as calls, prepayments and maturities of ~~tax-exempt~~legacy higher-rate securities have been replaced with ~~taxable securities due to their~~purchases at lower ~~tax equivalency benefit.~~overall market yields. Increased prepayments on mortgage-backed securities in the lower rate environment also reduced the taxable securities yields due to higher amortization. The average balance of tax-exempt securities, which have the highest yields within securities, decreased to ~~20.1%~~22.2% of total average securities in the ~~first~~third quarter of 2020 compared to ~~25.6%~~22.9% in the ~~first~~third quarter of 2019.

Total portfolio loans increased ~~$2.7~~$3.2 billion or ~~35.0%~~41.7% over the last twelve months, while total commercial loans increased ~~$2.3~~$3.0 billion or ~~44.7%~~58.4%. Loan growth was achieved through ~~$3.3~~$4.4 billion in total loan originations, led by ~~$2.1~~$2.9 billion in business loan originations for the past twelve months. Loan growth was driven by the acquisition of OLBK in 2019, PPP loans, expanded market areas and additional commercial personnel in our core markets, but was partially offset by significant loan paydowns or payoffs as some loans moved into the secondary lending market by customers who refinanced their commercial real estate mortgages, and some financed projects were sold by their developers.

Commercial loans with floors currently average 4.36% on approximately ~~$2.2~~$2.1 billion or ~~29%~~26% of total commercial loans at ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020, as compared to $2.4 billion averaging 4.50% or 33% of commercial loans at December 31, 2019. Approximately ~~64%~~69% or ~~$1.4~~$1.5 billion of these loans are currently priced at their floor, as compared to 49% or $1.2 billion at December 31, 2019. These loans typically do not adjust as rapidly from their current floor level as compared to loans without floors, due to the amount of the rate change as compared to the floor rate or next repricing ~~dates.~~date. In addition, in a declining rate environment, some customers may request rates below existing contractual floors, which we may grant for competitive or other reasons.

Interest expense ~~increased $1.6~~decreased $8.2 million or ~~7.7%~~38.5% in the ~~first~~third quarter of 2020 as compared to the same period in 2019, due to ~~increases in the balances of interest bearing liabilities from the acquisition of OLBK, partially offset by~~ decreases in the ~~rates paid on most~~cost of all interest bearing liability categories, as market rates dropped in reaction to COVID-19 and management reduced certain deposit rates, as well as higher purchase accounting time deposit accretion. The cost of interest bearing liabilities decreased by 1556 basis points from the ~~first~~third quarter of 2019 to ~~0.91%~~0.53% in 2020. ~~Average interest~~Interest bearing deposits increased ~~$1.4~~$1.9 billion or ~~22.7%~~31.2% from the ~~first~~third quarter of 2019, due to the acquisition of OLBK and increases in organic deposits heavily driven by CARES Act stimulus deposits. The rate on interest bearing deposits decreased 1045 basis points to 26 basis points from the ~~first~~third quarter of 2019, primarily from aggressive decreases in rates on interest bearing public funds and certificates of ~~deposit.~~deposit in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Average non-interest bearing demand deposit balances increased from the ~~first~~third quarter of 2019 to the ~~first~~third quarter of 2020 by ~~$716.8 million~~$1.6 billion or ~~29.6%~~62.9% and were ~~28.6%~~33.1% of total average deposits at ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020, compared to ~~27.5%~~28.5% at ~~March 31, 2019, partially~~September 30, 2020, reflecting the acquired OLBK non-interest bearing demand deposits, CARES Act stimulus deposits, PPP loan deposits, higher personal savings and ongoing checking account marketing strategies. The average balance of FHLB borrowings ~~increased $418.2~~decreased $41.8 million from the ~~first~~third quarter of 2019 to 2020 due to the maturity of legacy higher-rate FHLB borrowings ~~acquired in~~throughout the ~~OLBK acquisition~~second and ~~also as Wesbanco increased~~third quarters being funded by excess liquidity ~~sources in response to the COVID-19 pandemic; however,~~balances. These maturities benefitted the average rate paid as it decreased by 1935 basis points to ~~2.25% over this same time period due to lower interest rates on new borrowings and~~2.16% from the ~~maturity of some legacy higher-rate borrowings in the first~~third quarter of ~~2020.~~2019. Average other borrowings, subordinated debt and junior subordinated debt balances increased ~~$17.2~~$101.4 million or ~~3.3%~~21.4% from the ~~first~~third quarter of 2019 to 2020, partially due to the acquisition of OLBK, and their average rates paid decreased by 88137 and 42139 basis points, respectively, over this same time period due primarily to decreases in LIBOR, the index upon which ~~most of~~ this variable-rate type of borrowing is ~~priced.~~priced, other than the fixed rate subordinated debt.

The 150 basis points in total ~~Federal~~federal funds rate cuts in the first quarter of 2020, as well as the generally lower rates across the yield curve, are expected to result in the core net interest margin declining ~~approximately 20 to 25~~a few basis points over the remainder of the year. Lower anticipated earning asset yields caused by loans repricing to lower rates, new loan production rates being lower than existing loan rates, and security cash flows being reinvested at lower rates are expected to be partially offset by ~~aggressive~~ price reductions to deposit rates ~~at the end of the first quarter~~ and lower wholesale funding costs. ~~Wesbanco~~Wesbanco’s participation in the PPP program is expected to positively contribute to net interest income resulting in a modest ~~increase~~positive adjustment to the net interest margin ~~this year.~~in future periods as SBA loan forgiveness occurs for qualifying customers and net deferred fees are accreted into income at the date of loan payoff.

	For The Three Months Ended March 31,										For The Three Months Ended September 30,										For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2020					2019					2020					2019					2020					2019
	Average		Average			Average		Average			Average		Average			Average		Average			Average		Average			Average		Average
(unaudited, dollars in thousands)	Balance		Rate			Balance		Rate			Balance		Rate			Balance		Rate			Balance		Rate			Balance		Rate
ASSETS
Due from banks - interest bearing	$	133,532		1.21	%	$	76,731		1.70	%	$	755,575		0.16	%	$	71,163		2.41	%	$	509,928		0.25	%	$	73,617		2.50	%
Loans, net of unearned income⁽¹⁾		10,375,187		4.63	%		7,659,542		5.06	%		11,107,106		4.17	%		7,751,724		4.88	%		10,813,737		4.34	%		7,704,212		4.99	%
Securities:⁽²⁾
Taxable		2,576,668		2.65	%		2,353,856		2.84	%		2,121,780		2.19	%		2,301,933		2.76	%		2,328,196		2.45	%		2,330,439		2.81	%
Tax-exempt ⁽³⁾		646,587		3.51	%		810,702		3.46	%		603,835		3.49	%		684,164		3.52	%		624,278		3.50	%		744,949		3.50	%
Total securities		3,223,255		2.82	%		3,164,558		3.00	%		2,725,615		2.47	%		2,986,097		2.93	%		2,952,474		2.67	%		3,075,388		2.97	%
Other earning assets		69,581		6.37	%		52,114		7.30	%		56,575		6.88	%		53,181		6.80	%		65,849		6.27	%		51,954		7.12	%
Total earning assets ⁽³⁾		13,801,555		4.19	%		10,952,945		4.45	%		14,644,871		3.66	%		10,862,165		4.34	%		14,341,988		3.86	%		10,905,171		4.41	%
Other assets		1,983,384					1,557,087					2,074,846					1,625,988					2,065,777					1,590,847
Total Assets	$	15,784,939				$	12,510,032				$	16,719,717				$	12,488,153				$	16,407,765				$	12,496,018

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Interest bearing demand deposits	$	2,342,441		0.58	%	$	2,129,601		0.75	%	$	2,654,161		0.18	%	$	2,126,720		0.84	%	$	2,518,952		0.32	%	$	2,131,887		0.80	%
Money market accounts		1,543,763		0.61	%		1,154,563		0.67	%		1,623,969		0.17	%		1,097,930		0.71	%		1,590,498		0.33	%		1,122,665		0.70	%
Savings deposits		1,953,487		0.19	%		1,659,751		0.13	%		2,140,932		0.06	%		1,686,267		0.20	%		2,051,930		0.10	%		1,674,262		0.16	%
Certificates of deposit		1,989,450		0.82	%		1,438,468		1.10	%		1,761,087		0.72	%		1,321,696		1.15	%		1,865,439		0.77	%		1,385,349		1.14	%
Total interest bearing deposits		7,829,141		0.55	%		6,382,383		0.65	%		8,180,149		0.26	%		6,232,613		0.71	%		8,026,819		0.37	%		6,314,163		0.69	%
Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings		1,471,175		2.25	%		1,053,014		2.44	%		1,006,593		2.16	%		1,048,401		2.51	%		1,285,266		2.18	%		1,036,464		2.49	%
Other borrowings		336,042		1.04	%		327,839		1.92	%		383,771		0.32	%		317,931		1.69	%		361,949		0.54	%		321,976		1.82	%
Subordinated debt and junior subordinated debt		198,494		4.99	%		189,524		5.41	%		192,093		3.87	%		156,561		5.26	%		194,195		4.40	%		169,944		5.37	%
Total interest bearing liabilities ⁽¹⁾		9,834,852		0.91	%		7,952,760		1.06	%		9,762,606		0.53	%		7,755,506		1.09	%		9,868,229		0.69	%		7,842,547		1.07	%
Non-interest bearing demand deposits		3,137,279					2,420,462					4,041,681					2,481,384					3,679,743					2,463,076
Other liabilities		218,739					134,100					252,917					153,729					239,797					139,761
Shareholders’ equity		2,594,069					2,002,710					2,662,513					2,097,534					2,619,996					2,050,634
Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity	$	15,784,939				$	12,510,032				$	16,719,717				$	12,488,153				$	16,407,765				$	12,496,018
Taxable equivalent net interest spread				3.28	%				3.39	%				3.13	%				3.25	%				3.17	%				3.34	%
Taxable equivalent net interest margin				3.54	%				3.68	%				3.31	%				3.56	%				3.38	%				3.64	%

TABLE 3. RATE/VOLUME ANALYSIS OF CHANGES IN INTEREST INCOME AND INTEREST EXPENSE

	For The Three Months Ended March 31, 2020									For The Three Months Ended September 30, 2020									For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2020
	Compared to March 31, 2019									Compared to September 30, 2019									Compared to September 30, 2019
(unaudited, in thousands)	Volume			Rate			Net Increase (Decrease)			Volume			Rate			Net Increase (Decrease)			Volume			Rate			Net Increase (Decrease)
Increase (decrease) in interest income:
Due from banks - interest bearing	$	191		$	(116	)	$	75		$	(138	)	$	13		$	(125	)	$	(481	)	$	73		$	(408	)
Loans, net of unearned income		32,068			(8,067	)		24,001			32,065			(10,910	)		21,155			93,890			(30,082	)		63,808
Taxable securities		1,519			(1,266	)		253			(1,173	)		(3,045	)		(4,218	)		(47	)		(6,312	)		(6,359	)
Tax-exempt securities ⁽¹⁾		(1,431	)		58			(1,373	)		(705	)		(25	)		(730	)		(3,166	)		(2	)		(3,168	)
Other earning assets		288			(138	)		150			58			16			74			579			(262	)		317
Total interest income change ⁽¹⁾		32,635			(9,529	)		23,106			30,107			(13,951	)		16,156			90,775			(36,585	)		54,190
Increase (decrease) in interest expense:
Interest bearing demand deposits		367			(919	)		(552	)		1,518			(4,782	)		(3,264	)		2,916			(9,695	)		(6,779	)
Money market accounts		601			(148	)		453			2,177			(3,443	)		(1,266	)		7,315			(9,259	)		(1,944	)
Savings deposits		104			297			401			332			(890	)		(558	)		708			(1,246	)		(538	)
Certificates of deposit		1,269			(1,118	)		151			5,121			(5,754	)		(633	)		(16,585	)		15,519			(1,066	)
Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings		2,366			(471	)		1,895			(257	)		(931	)		(1,188	)		3,480			(1,767	)		1,713
Other borrowings		38			(724	)		(686	)		358			(1,407	)		(1,049	)		627			(3,565	)		(2,938	)
Subordinated debt and junior subordinated debt		116			(184	)		(68	)		1,202			(1,408	)		(206	)		1,661			(2,081	)		(420	)
Total interest expense change		4,861			(3,267	)		1,594			10,451			(18,615	)		(8,164	)		122			(12,094	)		(11,972	)
Net interest income increase (decrease) ⁽¹⁾	$	27,774		$	(6,262	)	$	21,512		$	19,656		$	4,664		$	24,320		$	90,653		$	(24,491	)	$	66,162

The provision for credit losses – loans is the amount to be added to the allowance for credit losses – loans after net charge-offs have been deducted to bring the allowance to a level considered appropriate to absorb lifetime expected losses ~~incurred within the loan portfolio.~~for all portfolio loans. The provision for credit losses – loan commitments is the amount to be added to the allowance for credit losses for loan commitments to bring that allowance to a level considered appropriate to absorb lifetime expected losses ~~incurred~~ on unfunded loan commitments. The provision for credit losses - loans and loan commitments increased to ~~$29.8~~$16.3 million in the ~~first~~third quarter of 2020 compared to ~~$2.5~~$4.1 million in the ~~first~~third quarter of 2019 due to the adoption of CECL on January 1, 2020, and as a result of changes in the macroeconomic forecast resulting in expected significantly higher unemployment over the reasonable and supportable forecast period of one ~~year.~~year, primarily increasing the allowance for loan losses and allowance for loan commitments. Non-performing loans were 0.38% of total loans as of ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020, decreasing from ~~0.47%~~0.52% of total loans at the end of the ~~first~~third quarter of 2019. Non-performing assets were ~~0.39%~~0.38% of total loans and other real estate and repossessed assets as of ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020, decreasing from ~~0.54%~~0.57% at the end of the ~~first~~third quarter of 2019. Criticized and classified loans were ~~2.09%~~3.25% of total loans, increasing from ~~1.42%~~2.24% as of ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2019, primarily due to recent adjustments to the internal loan classification system, which impacted risk ~~grades.~~grades, and downgrades in the Company’s hospitality loan portfolio. Past due loans at ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020 were ~~0.46%~~0.25% of total loans, compared to ~~0.32%~~0.30% at ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2019. Annualized net loan charge-offs ~~increased~~decreased to ~~0.18%~~zero percent as of ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020 compared to ~~0.07%~~0.04% as of ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2019. (Please see the Allowance for Credit Losses – Loans and Loan Commitments section of this MD&A for additional discussion).

	For The Three Months Ended March 31,											For The Three Months Ended September 30,												For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
(unaudited, dollars in thousands)	2020			2019		$ Change			% Change			2020			2019			$ Change			% Change			2020		2019		$ Change			% Change
Trust fees	$	6,952		$	7,115	$	(163	)		(2.3	)	$	6,426		$	6,425		$	1			0.0		$	19,580	$	19,880	$	(300	)		(1.5	)
Service charges on deposits		6,617			6,549		68			1.0			5,332			7,056			(1,724	)		(24.4	)		16,272		19,803		(3,531	)		(17.8	)
Electronic banking fees		4,254			5,892		(1,638	)		(27.8	)		4,780			5,253			(473	)		(9.0	)		13,100		18,299		(5,199	)		(28.4	)
Net securities brokerage revenue		1,679			1,860		(181	)		(9.7	)		1,725			1,765			(40	)		(2.3	)		4,787		5,597		(810	)		(14.5	)
Bank-owned life insurance		1,769			1,319		450			34.1			2,088			1,373			715			52.1			5,609		4,032		1,577			39.1
Net securities gains		1,491			657		834			126.9			787			235			552			234.9			3,577		3,800		(223	)		(5.9	)
Mortgage banking income		1,276			1,056		220			20.8			8,488			2,588			5,900			228.0			17,295		5,262		12,033			228.7
Net insurance services revenue		845			908		(63	)		(6.9	)		1,026			812			214			26.4			2,807		2,507		300			12.0
Debit card sponsorship income		708			—		708			100.0			751			—			751			100.0			2,102		—		2,102			100.0
Payment processing fees		680			648		32			4.9			669			709			(40	)		(5.6	)		2,133		2,142		(9	)		(0.4	)
Net gain on other real estate owned and other assets		169			136		33			24.3			(19	)		158			(177	)		(112.0	)		84		670		(586	)		(87.5	)
Swap fee and valuation income		(102	)		369		(471	)		(127.6	)		1,286			(381	)		1,667			437.5			4,134		499		3,635			728.5
Other		1,671			1,264		407			32.2			1,273			957			316			33.0			4,001		3,387		614			18.1
Total non-interest income	$	28,009		$	27,773	$	236			0.8		$	34,612		$	26,950		$	7,662			28.4		$	95,481	$	85,878	$	9,603			11.2

Non-interest income is a significant source of revenue and an important part of Wesbanco’s results of ~~operations.~~operations, as it represents 21.0% of total revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2020. Wesbanco offers its customers a wide range of retail, commercial, investment and electronic banking services, which are viewed as a vital component of Wesbanco’s ability to attract and maintain customers, as well as providing additional fee income beyond normal spread-related income to Wesbanco. For the ~~first~~third quarter of 2020, non-interest income increased ~~$0.2~~$7.7 million or ~~0.8%~~28.4% compared to the ~~first~~third quarter of 2019, primarily due to ~~the acquisition of OLBK and the new debit sponsorship income revenue stream,~~ a ~~$0.8~~$5.9 million or 228.0% increase in ~~net securities gains~~mortgage banking income and a ~~$0.5~~$1.7 million or 437.5% increase in ~~bank-owned life insurance.~~swap fee and valuation income. The increases were somewhat offset by the Durbin amendment and its impact on electronic banking fees and the COVID-19 impact on several revenue streams, ~~including trust fees, net securities brokerage revenue~~with the largest decreases in service charges on deposits and ~~swap fee and valuation income.~~electronic banking fees. For the nine months ended September 30, 2020, non-interest income increased $9.6 million or 11.2% from the nine months ended September 30, 2019 for similar reasons as for the third quarter.

Trust fees ~~decreased $0.2 million or 2.3%~~were flat compared to the ~~first~~third quarter of ~~2019 due to a decrease in the market value of trust assets resulting from lower market values due to the pandemic.~~2019. Total trust assets ~~have decreased $0.4 billion from $4.5~~were $4.6 billion at ~~March 31, 2019~~September 30, 2020 as compared to ~~$4.1~~$4.4 billion at ~~March 31, 2020.~~September 30, 2019. At ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020, trust assets include managed assets of ~~$3.3~~$3.7 billion and non-managed (custodial) assets of ~~$0.8~~$0.9 billion. Assets managed for the WesMark Funds, a proprietary group of mutual funds that is advised by Wesbanco Trust and Investment Services, were ~~$816.2~~$943.6 million as of ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020 and ~~$913.4~~$914.6 million at ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2019, and are included in managed assets.

Service charges on deposits decreased $1.7 million or 24.4% to $5.3 million in the third quarter of 2020 as compared to the same period in 2019 due to higher consumer deposit balances throughout the quarter associated with CARES Act stimulus payments and lower general consumer spending, resulting in fewer eligible fee-generating transactions. For the nine months ended September 30, 2020, service charges on deposits decreased $3.5 million or 17.8% compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2019.

Electronic banking fees, which include debit card interchange fees, decreased ~~$1.6~~$0.5 million or ~~27.8%~~9.0% compared to the ~~first~~third quarter of 2019 ~~which reflected an approximate $2.7 million impact on first~~due to a lower volume of transactions. This quarter ~~2020 fees from~~marks the ~~ongoing~~one-year anniversary of the limitation on interchange fees ~~for debit card processing that resulted from~~due to the Durbin amendment toin the 2010 Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection ~~Act. This limitation only applies~~Act (“Dodd-Frank Act”). For the nine months ended September 30, 2020, electronic banking fees decreased $5.2 million or 28.4% due to ~~banks with greater than $10 billion~~the effect of the Dodd-Frank Act in ~~total assets, and took effect for Wesbanco~~2020.

Bank-owned life insurance increased $0.7 million or 52.1% in the third quarter of ~~2019. Slightly offsetting~~2020 compared to the ~~effect of the Durbin amendment is a higher volume of debit card transactions, mostly from the increased customer base from the OLBK acquisition.~~

~~Bank-owned life insurance increased $0.5 million or 34.1% from the first~~third quarter of 2019 due to a higher mortality-related benefits received in the current period as well as an increase in the cash surrender value, ~~from that in the prior period. The total cash surrender value increased from $226.6 million at March 31, 2019 to $301.3 million at March 31, 2020, primarily attributable~~due to the bank-owned life insurance acquired ~~from~~in the OLBK ~~and earnings on~~acquisition. As of September 30, 2020, total cash surrender value was $304.3 million compared to $229.3 million at September 30, 2019. For the ~~portfolio.~~nine months ended, bank-owned life insurance increased $1.6 million or 39.1% for similar reasons as the three months ended.

Net securities gains increased ~~$0.8~~$0.6 million or ~~126.9%~~234.9% in the ~~first three months~~third quarter of 2020 compared to the same period of 2019, due to a $0.7 million market adjustment recorded in the third quarter of 2020 on the underlying investments of the deferred compensation plan, which is offset by a corresponding amount in employee benefits expense. For the nine months ended September 30, 2020, net securities gains decreased $0.2 million or 5.9% compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2019 due to a gain of $2.6 million on the sale of Wesbanco’s VISA Class B stock in the second quarter of 2019. This stock was held at a zero cost basis and Wesbanco holds no additional shares of VISA Class B stock. Wesbanco recorded $2.1 million of gains in the first quarter of 2020 on the sale of approximately $218 million of mortgage-backed securities ~~in March 2020 in order~~ to take advantage of market ~~conditions~~opportunities and to create additional liquidity for potential COVID-19 related needs. These gains were partially offset by a negative $1.3 million market adjustment in the deferred compensation plan, which had an offsetting reduction in employee benefits expense.increase liquidity.

Mortgage banking income increased ~~$0.2~~$5.9 million or ~~20.8%~~228.0% from the ~~first~~third quarter of 2019 compared to the ~~first~~third quarter of 2020. For the ~~first three months~~third quarter of 2020, mortgage production was ~~$217.0~~$394.3 million, which was an increase of ~~130.7%~~101.2% from the comparable 2019 period. For the three months ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020, ~~$102.1~~$217.6 million in mortgages were sold into the secondary market at a net margin of ~~1.3%~~3.9% as compared to ~~$39.4~~$98.5 million at a net margin of ~~2.7%~~2.6% in the comparable 2019 period. Included in mortgage banking income and the calculation of net margin noted above ~~is a $2.8~~are losses of $1.6 million ~~loss~~ and ~~a $0.3~~$0.5 million ~~loss~~ from the fair value adjustments on ~~loans held for sale,~~mortgage loan commitments and related derivatives for the three months ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively. Such losses were a result of the extreme market volatility stemming from COVID-19, and as a result, sale margins were reduced due to lower values associated with loan commitments and the accompanying mortgage servicing rights.

Debit card sponsorship income is a new revenue stream for Wesbanco that was acquired in the OLBK acquisition on November 22, 2019. The fees are earned from Wesbanco’s sponsorship of certain customers into various debit networks and are generated from the total transactions processed on the debit networks. Debit sponsorship income was ~~$0.7~~$0.8 million for the quarter ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020 and $2.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2020. Wesbanco intends to reduce this program’s customer-related revenues over the next 12-18 months for risk-related reasons.

Swap fee and valuation income ~~decreased $0.5~~increased $1.7 million or ~~127.6%~~437.5% for the ~~first~~third quarter of 2020 compared to the ~~first~~third quarter of 2019 due to ~~a decrease in the fair value of existing swaps resulting from the lower and inverted yield curve during 2020, slightly offset by~~ an increased volume of new loan swaps in the ~~first~~third quarter of ~~2020.~~2020 and an increase in the fair value of existing swaps. For the three months ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020, new swaps executed totaled ~~$135.6~~$25.8 million in notional principal resulting in ~~$2.6~~$0.9 million of fee income, compared to new swaps executed of ~~$39.8~~$6.7 million in notional principal resulting in ~~$0.7~~$0.2 million of fee income for the three months ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2019. Fair value adjustments on existing swaps for the three months ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020 and 2019 were ~~($2.8)~~$0.4 million and ($~~0.3)~~0.6) million, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2020, swap fee and valuation income increased $3.6 million or 728.5% for similar reasons as for the quarter.

	For The Three Months Ended March 31,											For The Three Months Ended September 30,												For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
(unaudited, dollars in thousands)	2020			2019		$ Change			% Change			2020			2019			$ Change			% Change			2020			2019		$ Change			% Change
Salaries and wages	$	38,910		$	30,940	$	7,970			25.8		$	38,342		$	32,915		$	5,427			16.5		$	114,025		$	95,501	$	18,524			19.4
Employee benefits		10,373			9,989		384			3.8			10,604			9,726			878			9.0			31,115			29,419		1,696			5.8
Net occupancy		7,084			5,566		1,518			27.3			7,092			5,392			1,700			31.5			20,809			16,343		4,466			27.3
Equipment		6,039			4,833		1,206			25.0			6,229			5,273			956			18.1			17,991			14,924		3,067			20.6
Marketing		1,138			1,243		(105	)		(8.4	)		1,577			1,505			72			4.8			4,282			4,002		280			7.0
FDIC insurance		2,113			1,353		760			56.2			1,948			(1,221	)		3,169			259.5			6,456			1,287		5,169			401.6
Amortization of intangible assets		3,374			2,514		860			34.2			3,346			2,446			900			36.8			10,085			7,424		2,661			35.8
Restructuring and merger-related expenses		5,164			3,107		2,057			66.2			3,608			1,688			1,920			113.7			9,241			4,876		4,365			89.5
Franchise and other miscellaneous taxes		3,742			3,026		716			23.7			3,803			3,203			600			18.7			11,014			9,405		1,609			17.1
Consulting, regulatory, accounting and advisory fees		2,841			1,817		1,024			56.4			3,103			2,212			891			40.3			9,182			6,267		2,915			46.5
ATM and electronic banking interchange expenses		1,789			1,723		66			3.8			2,188			1,804			384			21.3			5,940			5,239		701			13.4
Postage and courier expenses		1,257			1,549		(292	)		(18.9	)		1,180			1,299			(119	)		(9.2	)		3,768			4,045		(277	)		(6.8	)
Legal fees		815			679		136			20.0			812			628			184			29.3			2,463			2,243		220			9.8
Communications		1,024			930		94			10.1			997			898			99			11.0			3,241			2,723		518			19.0
Supplies		1,217			1,140		77			6.8			993			1,055			(62	)		(5.9	)		3,520			3,301		219			6.6
Other real estate owned and foreclosure expenses		(65	)		12		(77	)		(641.7	)		(10	)		176			(186	)		(105.7	)		(27	)		339		(366	)		(108.0	)
Other		4,518			4,011		507			12.6			4,131			4,269			(138	)		(3.2	)		13,674			12,314		1,360			11.0
Total non-interest expense	$	91,333		$	74,432	$	16,901			22.7		$	89,943		$	73,268		$	16,675			22.8		$	266,779		$	219,652	$	47,127			21.5

Non-interest expense in the ~~first~~third quarter of 2020 increased ~~$16.9~~$16.7 million or ~~22.7%~~22.8% compared to the same quarter in 2019, principally due to the OLBK acquisition, which increased assets by $3.0 billion, excluding goodwill, and added 37 offices to our branch network. In the ~~first three months~~third quarter of 2020, there were ~~$5.2~~$0.6 million of merger-related expenses for the OLBK acquisition, as compared to ~~$3.1~~$1.7 million in the ~~first~~third quarter of ~~2019 for the FFKT acquisition.~~2019. Excluding restructuring and merger-related expenses, non-interest expense increased $14.8 million or ~~20.8%~~20.6% from the ~~first~~third quarter of 2019 to the third quarter of 2020 and increased $42.8 million or 19.9% from the first ~~quarter~~nine months of 2019 to the first nine months of 2020.

Salaries and wages increased ~~$8.0~~$5.4 million or ~~25.8%~~16.5% from the ~~first~~third quarter of 2019 due to increased compensation expense related to an increase in full-time equivalent (“FTE”) employees from the OLBK acquisition and from annual merit increases in ~~mid-2019.~~mid-2020. Employee benefits expense increased ~~$0.4~~$0.9 million or 9.0% compared to the ~~first~~third quarter of 2019, due mostly to ~~an increase in health care costs, and was slightly offset by~~ a ~~$1.3~~$0.7 million market adjustment in the ~~first~~third quarter of 2020 on the underlying investments of the deferred compensation ~~plan,~~plan. For the nine months ended, salaries and wages and employee benefits expense increased for ~~which a corresponding entry was recorded in net securities gains (losses).~~the same reasons as noted for the quarter.

Net occupancy increased ~~$1.5~~$1.7 million or ~~27.3%~~31.5% from the ~~first~~third quarter of ~~2019,~~2020, principally due to increased ~~building related~~building-related costs including utilities, lease expense, depreciation, repairs and other seasonal maintenance costs, mostly from the acquired retail branches, as well as normal building maintenance and repair costs of the legacy branch network and other infrastructure needs. For the nine months ended September 30, 2020, net occupancy increased $4.5 million or 27.3% compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2019.

Equipment costs increased ~~$1.2~~$1.0 million or ~~25.0%~~18.1% compared to the ~~first~~third quarter of 2019, due to the OLBK acquisition and increases in service agreements expense from continuous improvements in technology and communication infrastructure, software costs and loan origination and customer support centers.

FDIC insurance increased ~~$0.8~~$3.2 million or ~~56.2%~~259.5% compared to the ~~first~~third quarter of 2019, for risk-related reasons and due to the growth in the Bank’s balance sheet primarily from the OLBK acquisition in November 2019, which caused the assessment base to ~~increase.~~increase, as well as the recording of a $2.4 million assessment credit in the prior year period. For the nine months ended September 30, 2020, FDIC insurance increased $5.2 million or 401.6% compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2019 for the same reasons as indicated for the quarter.

Amortization of intangible assets increased $0.9 million or ~~34.2%~~36.8% compared to the ~~first~~third quarter of 2019. The OLBK acquisition added approximately $32.9 million in core deposit intangibles. ~~The final core deposit~~For the nine months ended September 30, 2020, amortization of intangible ~~valuation for OLBK was received in~~assets increased $2.7 million or 35.8% compared to the ~~first quarter, of which the intangible asset and related amortization was trued-up from the estimate previously utilized as of December 31,~~nine months ended September 30, 2019.

Restructuring and merger-related expenses in the ~~first~~third quarter of 2020 totaled ~~$5.2~~$3.6 million, ~~all~~ of which $3.0 million were related to the financial center optimization strategy announced by Wesbanco during the third quarter, and $0.6 million were related to the OLBK acquisition that closed in the fourth quarter of 2019. The ~~merger related~~restructuring expenses were predominantly net write-downs to appraised value on owned and leased properties that will be closed as part of the strategy in early 2021. The merger-related expenses included ~~$2.2~~$0.2 million in change in control payments, ~~$1.2~~$0.2 million in contract termination costs, $0.1 million in non-refundable one-time conversion costs ~~$0.9~~and $0.1 million in ~~severance and~~ retention ~~costs, $0.6 million in contract termination costs and $0.3 million in miscellaneous accounting and valuation fees.~~bonuses.

Consulting, regulatory, accounting and advisory fees increased ~~$1.0~~$0.9 million or ~~56.4%~~40.3% from the ~~first~~third quarter of 2019 due to increased swap clearing expense from a higher volume of cleared swaps in the ~~first~~third quarter of 2020 compared to same period of 2019, as well as increased underwriting and processing fees from a higher volume of mortgage originations in the current period.

The provision for income taxes ~~decreased $5.2~~was $7.7 million ~~or 59.1% in~~for the ~~first quarter of~~three months ended September 30, 2020, which is a $0.7 million decrease compared to the ~~first quarter of 2019, primarily~~three months ended September 30, 2019. The decrease in the provision for income taxes is due to a ~~$22.2 million or 45.1% decrease in pre-tax income. The effective tax rate decreased to 13.4% compared to 18.0% in the first quarter of~~

~~2019. The~~ decrease in the effective tax rate to 15.7% in the third quarter of 2020 compared to 18.2% in the third quarter of 2019. For the nine months ended September 30, 2020, the provision for income taxes was ~~also due~~$11.3 million, which is a $16.0 million decrease compared to the ~~establishment~~nine months ended September 30, 2019. The decrease in the provision for income taxes is primarily driven by the $69.3 million decrease in pre-tax income and $0.9 million of ~~Maryland deferred taxes as well as a carryback claim as a result~~discrete benefit items in the first nine months of ~~the acquisition of OLBK. Wesbanco expects the~~2020. The year-to-date effective tax rate decreased to ~~be approximately 17.0 – 17.5%~~14.1%, as compared to 18.2%, for the ~~remainder~~first nine months of ~~2020.~~2019.

Total assets, ~~and~~ deposits ~~increased 1.8%~~ and ~~0.4%, respectively, while~~ shareholders’ equity ~~decreased 0.3%~~increased 5.3%, 10.9% and 5.4%, respectively, compared to December 31, 2019. Total securities decreased ~~$170.2~~$452.9 million or ~~5.2%~~13.9% from December 31, 2019 to ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020, primarily driven by the first quarter sale of mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations, at a net gain of $2.1 million, to provide for additional liquidity ~~related to~~for potential COVID-19 ~~requirements.~~related requirements, as well as higher security calls and prepayments. The securities’ decrease was partially offset by a ~~$52.0~~$46.8 million increase in net unrealized gains in the available-for-sale portfolio. Total portfolio loans increased ~~$81.6~~$721.6 million or ~~0.8%.~~7.0% as participation in the SBA PPP loan program provided approximately $853.1 million in loans. Deposits increased ~~$39.3 million~~$1.2 billion from year-end resulting from increases of ~~2.6%~~22.1%, ~~1.5%,~~12.0% and ~~1.4%~~6.7% in ~~savings~~demand deposits, ~~demand~~savings deposits and money market deposits, respectively, which were partially offset by a ~~5.7%~~16.9% decrease in certificates of deposit. The ~~increase~~growth in ~~transactional account balances~~transaction-based accounts is primarily attributable to marketing, customer incentives, focused retail and business strategies to obtain more account relationships and customers’ preferences for shorter-term ~~maturities, coupled with~~maturities. The transaction-based accounts increased towards the end of the first quarter and into the second quarter from the CARES Act individual and family payments, as well as deposits from the small businesses obtaining loans from the PPP loan program and an increase in personal savings rates and overall decreased consumer spending. Deposit balances were also impacted by bonus and royalty payments for Marcellus and Utica shale gas payments from energy companies in Wesbanco’s southwestern Pennsylvania, eastern Ohio, and northern West Virginia markets. The decrease in certificates of deposit is a result of periodically offering lower than median competitive rates for maturing certificates of deposit, primarily for single-service customers, and customer preferences for other deposit types, ~~which was partially offset by~~coupled with a ~~$17.0~~$26.8 million ~~increase~~decrease in CDARS® balances. The decline was also impacted by customer run-off of higher cost certificates of deposit from the OLBK acquisition. Total borrowings ~~increased 11.3%~~decreased 27.9% or ~~$213.7~~$529.2 million during the first ~~three~~nine months of 2020 as FHLB maturities exceeded new FHLB borrowings ~~exceeded maturities~~ by ~~$170.0~~$621.0 million, ~~and other short-term borrowings increased $51.6 million to build additional balance sheet liquidity. These increases were partially offset by~~coupled with $6.7 million of junior subordinated debentures, acquired from ~~OLBH,~~OLBK, which were redeemed during the first ~~three~~nine months of 2020. These decreases were partially offset by a $99.5 million increase in other short-term borrowings, primarily customer repos. Total shareholders’ equity ~~decreased~~increased approximately ~~$7.9~~$139.0 million or ~~0.3%~~5.4%, compared to December 31, 2019, primarily due to $144.5 in net proceeds from the issuance of 6.0 million depositary shares, each representing 1/40^th interest in a share of Wesbanco’s 6.75% fixed rate reset non-cumulative perpetual Series A preferred stock. Additionally, net income exceeded dividends for the period by $4.8 million and comprehensive income increased $37.1 million. Such factors were partially offset by the retained earnings effect of ASU 2016-13 adoption totaling $26.6 million, ~~and~~ share ~~repurchase activity~~repurchases in the first quarter totaling $25.0 million ~~which were partially offset by net income exceeding dividends for the period by $2.0 million~~ and ~~a $39.9 million other comprehensive income gain.~~restricted stock vesting activity totaling $0.3 million.

	March 31,			December 31,									September 30,			December 31,
(unaudited, dollars in thousands)	2020			2019			Change ($)			Change (%)			2020			2019			Change ($)			Change (%)
Equity securities (at fair value)	$	11,230		$	12,343		$	(1,113	)		(9.0	)	$	12,516		$	12,343		$	173			1.4
Available-for-sale debt securities (at fair value)
U.S. Treasury		21,508			32,836			(11,328	)		(34.5	)		19,992			32,836			(12,844	)		(39.1	)
U.S. Government sponsored entities and agencies		159,379			159,628			(249	)		(0.2	)		192,849			159,628			33,221			20.8
Residential mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations of government sponsored entities and agencies		1,671,469			1,815,987			(144,518	)		(8.0	)		1,421,023			1,815,987			(394,964	)		(21.7	)
Commercial mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations of government sponsored entities and agencies		223,827			190,409			33,418			17.6			259,610			190,409			69,201			36.3
Obligations of states and political subdivisions		141,573			145,609			(4,036	)		(2.8	)		126,539			145,609			(19,070	)		(13.1	)
Corporate debt securities		44,326			49,089			(4,763	)		(9.7	)		25,911			49,089			(23,178	)		(47.2	)
Total available-for-sale debt securities	$	2,262,082		$	2,393,558		$	(131,476	)		(5.5	)	$	2,045,924		$	2,393,558		$	(347,634	)		(14.5	)
Held-to-maturity debt securities (at amortized cost)
U.S. Government sponsored entities and agencies	$	9,041		$	9,216		$	(175	)		(1.9	)	$	8,256		$	9,216		$	(960	)		(10.4	)
Residential mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations of government sponsored entities and agencies		116,214			122,937			(6,723	)		(5.5	)		99,703			122,937			(23,234	)		(18.9	)
Obligations of states and political subdivisions		655,952			686,376			(30,424	)		(4.4	)		605,636			686,376			(80,740	)		(11.8	)
Corporate debt securities		33,207			33,224			(17	)		(0.1	)		33,172			33,224			(52	)		(0.2	)
Total held-to-maturity debt securities		814,414			851,753			(37,339	)		(4.4	)		746,767			851,753			(104,986	)		(12.3	)
Total securities	$	3,087,726		$	3,257,654		$	(169,928	)		(5.2	)	$	2,805,207		$	3,257,654		$	(452,447	)		(13.9	)
Available-for-sale and equity securities:
Weighted average yield at the respective period end ⁽²⁾		2.66	%		2.67	%								2.28	%		2.67	%
As a % of total securities		73.6	%		73.9	%								73.4	%		73.9	%
Weighted average life (in years)		4.1			4.1									3.3			4.1
Held-to-maturity securities:
Weighted average yield at the respective period end ⁽²⁾		3.48	%		3.51	%								3.42	%		3.51	%
As a % of total securities		26.4	%		26.1	%								26.6	%		26.1	%
Weighted average life (in years)		3.6			3.8									3.7			3.8
Total securities:
Weighted average yield at the respective period end ⁽²⁾		2.88	%		2.89	%								2.60	%		2.89	%
As a % of total securities		100.0	%		100.0	%								100.0	%		100.0	%
Weighted average life (in years)		3.9			4.0									3.4			4.0

Total investment securities, which are a source of liquidity for Wesbanco as well as a contributor to interest income, decreased ~~$169.9~~$452.4 million or ~~5.2%~~13.9% from December 31, 2019 to ~~March 31, 2020.~~September 30, 2020, and represented 16.9% of total assets at period end. Through the first ~~three~~nine months of 2020, the available-for-sale portfolio decreased ~~$131.5~~$347.6 million or ~~5.5%~~14.5% primarily due to the sale of residential mortgage-backed securities at the end of the first quarter to take advantage of market opportunities and to free up cash for COVID-19 related needs, such as larger commercial or home equity line withdrawals, while the held-to-maturity portfolio decreased ~~$37.3~~$105.0 million or ~~4.4%~~12.3% due to calls of municipal securities in the current lower rate environment. The weighted average yield of the portfolio decreased by 129 basis ~~point~~points from 2.89% at December 31, 2019 to ~~2.88%~~2.60% at ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020, ~~primarily~~ due to increased prepayment speeds on mortgage-backed securities and calls of legacy higher rate agency and municipal securities as market rates declined ~~in the first quarter,~~ and ~~the noted sales at a net gain.~~stayed lower throughout 2020.

Net unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities included in accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax, as of ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019 were ~~$58.0~~$54.0 million and $20.7 million, respectively. The net unrealized pre-tax gains represent temporary fluctuations resulting from changes in market rates in relation to fixed yields in the available-for-sale portfolio, and on an after tax-basis are accounted for as an adjustment to other comprehensive income in shareholders’ equity. Net unrealized pre-tax gains in the held-to-maturity portfolio, which are not accounted for in ~~the~~ other comprehensive income, were ~~$26.7~~$35.6 million at ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020, compared to $22.8 million at December 31, 2019. With approximately ~~26%~~27% of the investment portfolio in the held-to-maturity category, the recent volatility in interest rates does not have as much impact on other comprehensive income ~~(loss)~~ as if the entire portfolio were included in the available-for-sale category. The increase in unrealized gains from year-end are due to the significant decrease in market rates and the shape of the yield curve throughout the first ~~quarter~~nine months of 2020 resulting from COVID-19 and the federal funds rate decreases. ~~Volatility in the municipal and corporate bond markets mitigated the overall increase in unrealized gains for those sectors of the portfolio.~~

Net realized securities gains increased $0.8 million, or 126.9% from the first quarter of 2019 due to the sale of approximately $218 million of securities in March 2020 in order to take advantage of market opportunities and create additional liquidity. Such gains were partially offset by a negative $1.3 million market adjustment in the deferred compensation plan. 47

Equity securities, of which a portion consist of investments in various mutual funds held in grantor trusts formed in connection with a key officer and director deferred compensation plan, are recorded at fair value. Gains and losses due to fair value fluctuations on equity securities are included in net securities gains or losses. For those equity securities relating to the key officer and director deferred compensation plan, the corresponding change in the obligation to the employee is recognized in employee benefits expense.

On January 1, 2020, Wesbanco adopted ASU 2016-13 (Topic 326), Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments. Upon adoption, the Company recognized $0.2 million to opening retained earnings, which ~~represents~~represented the CECL allowance as of January 1, 2020. The corporate and municipal bonds in Wesbanco’s held-to-maturity debt portfolio are analyzed quarterly to determine if an allowance for current expected credit losses is warranted. Wesbanco uses a database of historical financials of all corporate and municipal issuers and actual historical default and recovery rates on rated and non-rated transactions to estimate expected credit losses on an individual security basis. The expected credit losses are adjusted quarterly and are recorded in an allowance for expected credit losses on the balance sheet, which is deducted from the amortized cost basis of the held-to-maturity portfolio as a contra asset. The losses are recorded on the income statement in the provision for credit losses. Held-to-maturity investments in U.S. ~~Government sponsored~~Government-sponsored entities and agencies as well as mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations, which are all either issued by a direct governmental entity or a government-sponsored entity, have no historical evidence supporting expected credit losses; therefore, Wesbanco has estimated these losses at zero, and will monitor this assumption in the future for any economic or governmental policies that could affect this assumption.

Wesbanco’s municipal portfolio ~~comprises 25.8%~~represented 26.1% of the overall securities portfolio as of ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020 compared to 25.5% as of December 31, 2019, and it carries different risks that are not as prevalent in other security types contained in the portfolio. The following table presents the allocation of the individual bonds in the municipal bond portfolio based on the combined ratings of two major bond credit rating agencies (at fair value):

	March 31, 2020				December 31, 2019				September 30, 2020				December 31, 2019
(unaudited, dollars in thousands)	Amount		% of Total		Amount		% of Total		Amount		% of Total		Amount		% of Total
Municipal bonds (at fair value) ⁽¹⁾:
Investment Grade – Prime	$	72,695		8.9	$	78,730		9.2
Investment Grade – High		555,862		67.9		569,085		66.7
Investment Grade - Prime									$	68,633		9.0	$	78,730		9.2
Investment Grade - High										518,949		68.3		569,085		66.7
Investment Grade - Upper Medium		177,783		21.7		190,696		22.4		162,006		21.3		190,696		22.4
Investment Grade - Lower Medium		3,053		0.4		3,042		0.4		3,082		0.4		3,042		0.4
Non-Investment Grade – Speculative				—		638		0.1
Non-Investment Grade - Speculative										—		—		638		0.1
Not rated by either agency		9,291		1.1		10,011		1.2		7,762		1.0		10,011		1.2
Total municipal bond portfolio	$	818,684		100.0	$	852,202		100.0	$	760,432		100.0	$	852,202		100.0

Wesbanco’s municipal bond portfolio at ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020 consists of ~~$164.8~~$134.4 million of taxable (primarily Build America Bonds) and ~~$653.8~~$626.0 million of tax-exempt general obligation and revenue bonds. The following table presents additional information regarding the municipal bond type and issuer (at fair value):

	March 31, 2020				December 31, 2019				September 30, 2020				December 31, 2019
(unaudited, dollars in thousands)	Amount		% of Total		Amount		% of Total		Amount		% of Total		Amount		% of Total
Municipal bond type:
General Obligation	$	563,294		68.8	$	581,105		68.2	$	527,952		69.4	$	581,105		68.2
Revenue		255,390		31.2		271,097		31.8		232,480		30.6		271,097		31.8
Total municipal bond portfolio	$	818,684		100.0	$	852,202		100.0	$	760,432		100.0	$	852,202		100.0
Municipal bond issuer:
State Issued	$	72,392		8.8	$	76,228		8.9	$	46,704		6.1	$	76,228		8.9
Local Issued		746,292		91.2		775,974		91.1		713,728		93.9		775,974		91.1
Total municipal bond portfolio	$	818,684		100.0	$	852,202		100.0	$	760,432		100.0	$	852,202		100.0

Wesbanco’s municipal bond portfolio is broadly spread across the United States. The following table presents the top five states of municipal bond concentration based on total fair value at ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020:

	March 31, 2020				September 30, 2020
(unaudited, dollars in thousands)	Fair Value		% of Total		Fair Value		% of Total
Pennsylvania	$	185,308		22.6	$	167,751		22.1
Ohio		92,187		11.3		94,773		12.5
Texas		71,410		8.7		64,321		8.5
Kentucky		43,592		5.3		40,734		5.4
West Virginia		37,031		4.5
Illinois						37,245		4.9
All other states ⁽¹⁾		389,156		47.6		355,608		46.6
Total municipal bond portfolio	$	818,684		100.0	$	760,432		100.0

Wesbanco uses prices from independent pricing services and, to a lesser extent, indicative (non-binding) quotes from independent brokers, to measure the fair value of its securities. Wesbanco validates prices received from pricing services or brokers using a variety of methods, including, but not limited to, comparison to secondary pricing services, corroboration of pricing by reference to other independent market data such as secondary broker quotes and relevant benchmark indices, review of pricing by personnel familiar with market liquidity and other market-related conditions, review of pricing service methodologies, review of independent auditor reports received from the pricing service regarding its internal controls, and through review of inputs and assumptions used in pricing certain securities thinly traded or with limited observable data points. The procedures in place provide management with a sufficient understanding of the valuation models, assumptions, inputs and pricing to reasonably measure the fair value of Wesbanco’s securities. For additional disclosure relating to fair value measurements, refer to Note 8, “Fair Value Measurement” in the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Loans represent Wesbanco’s single largest balance sheet asset classification and the largest source of interest income. Business purpose loans consist of ~~commercial real estate (“CRE”)~~CRE loans and other ~~commercial and industrial (“~~C~~&I”)~~&I loans that are not secured by real estate. CRE loans are further segmented into land and construction loans, and loans for improved property. Consumer purpose loans consist of residential real estate loans, home equity lines of credit and other consumer loans. Loans held for sale generally consist of residential real estate loans originated for sale in the secondary market, but at times may also include other types of loans. The outstanding balance of each major category of the loan portfolio is summarized in Table 10.

The risk that borrowers will be unable or unwilling to repay their obligations and default on loans is inherent in all lending activities. Credit risk arises from many sources including general economic conditions, external events that impact businesses or industries, isolated events that impact a major employer, individual loss of employment or other personal hardships as well as changes in interest rates or the value of collateral. Credit risk is also impacted by a concentration of exposure within a geographic market or to one or more borrowers, industries or collateral types. The primary goal in managing credit risk is to minimize the impact of default by an individual borrower or group of borrowers. Credit risk is managed through the initial underwriting process as well as through ongoing monitoring and administration of the portfolio that varies by the type of loan. The Bank’s credit policies establish standard underwriting guidelines for each type of loan and require an appropriate evaluation of the credit characteristics of each borrower. This evaluation includes the borrower’s primary source of repayment capacity; the adequacy of collateral, if any, to secure the loan; the potential value of personal guarantees as secondary sources of repayment; and other factors unique to each loan that may increase or mitigate its risk. Credit bureau scores are also considered when evaluating consumer purpose loans as well as guarantors of business purpose loans. However, the Bank does not periodically update credit bureau scores subsequent to when loans are made to determine changes in credit history.

Credit risk is mitigated for all types of loans by continuously monitoring delinquency levels and pursuing collection efforts at the earliest stage of delinquency. The Bank also monitors general economic conditions, including employment, housing activity and real estate values in its market. The Bank also periodically evaluates and changes its underwriting standards when warranted based on market conditions, the historical performance of a category of the portfolio, or other external factors. Credit risk is also regularly evaluated for the impact of adverse economic and other events, such as the current COVID-19 pandemic crisis, that increase the risk of default and the potential loss in the event of default, to understand ~~their~~the impact on the Bank’s earnings and capital.

~~Over the last year, Wesbanco has been transitioning to a more objective internal loan grading system to reflect the credit quality of commercial loans.~~ Commercial loan risk grades are determined based on an evaluation of the relevant characteristics of each loan, assigned at inception and adjusted thereafter at any time to reflect changes in the risk profile throughout the life of each loan. The primary factors used to determine the risk grade are the sufficiency, reliability and sustainability of the primary source of repayment and overall financial strength of the borrower. The rating system more heavily weights the debt service coverage, leverage and ~~loan to value~~loan-to-value factors to derive the risk grade. Other factors that are considered at a lesser weighting include management, industry or ~~property type~~property-type risks, payment history, collateral orand guarantees.

	March 31, 2020				December 31, 2019				September 30, 2020				December 31, 2019
(unaudited, dollars in thousands)	Amount		% of Loans		Amount		% of Loans		Amount		% of Loans		Amount		% of Loans
Commercial real estate:
Land and construction	$	676,726		6.5	$	777,151		7.5	$	690,547		6.2	$	777,151		7.5
Improved property		4,927,679		47.4		4,947,857		48.0		5,018,101		45.0		4,947,857		48.0
Total commercial real estate		5,604,405		53.9		5,725,008		55.5		5,708,648		51.2		5,725,008		55.5
Commercial and industrial		1,801,751		17.3		1,644,699		16.0		1,654,116		14.9		1,644,699		16.0
Commercial and industrial - PPP										853,119		7.7		—		-
Residential real estate		1,929,590		18.6		1,873,647		18.2		1,798,019		16.2		1,873,647		18.2
Home equity		650,754		6.2		649,678		6.3		647,052		5.8		649,678		6.3
Consumer		363,096		3.5		374,953		3.6		328,592		3.0		374,953		3.6
Total portfolio loans		10,349,596		99.5		10,267,985		99.6		10,989,546		98.8		10,267,985		99.6
Loans held for sale		48,021		0.5		43,013		0.4		134,151		1.2		43,013		0.4
Total loans	$	10,397,617		100.0	$	10,310,998		100.0	$	11,123,697		100.0	$	10,310,998		100.0

Total loans increased ~~$86.6~~$812.7 million or ~~0.8%~~7.9% from December 31, 2019, while portfolio loans increased ~~$2.7~~$3.2 billion or ~~35.0%~~41.7% over the last twelve months. ~~While most~~Most of the loan growth over the last twelve months was due to the acquisition of OLBK in November 2019, totaling $2.5 billion, as well as the ~~organic loan growth~~origination of $853.1 million of PPP loans during the second and third quarters of 2020. Excluding PPP loans and the OLBK acquisition, total loans decreased over the last twelve months by 1.0% as commercial line usage decreased and a higher percentage of new residential loans originated were sold into the secondary market as opposed to holding them in the residential loan portfolio and consumer loan demand decreased as a result of the pandemic reducing consumer spending. Slightly offsetting the total decrease was ~~driven by strategic focus categories with 2.4%~~4.9% of organic growth in commercial real ~~estate and 4.2% organic growth in residential real~~ estate. ~~There was no growth in home equity organic loan balances due to lower demand as a result of higher interest rates earlier in 2019 and tax changes.~~ Organic commercial and industrial loans ~~increased 4.8%~~decreased 10.7%, due primarily to the lower line usage mentioned above and lower overall demand. Organic residential real estate loans decreased 4.5% over the last twelve ~~months.~~months, due to a greater portion of new originations sold into the secondary market and a greater portion of existing loans refinanced with other banks, while home equity loans were also refinanced into first mortgages due to customer preferences for fixed rate loans.

Total loan commitments of ~~$3.2~~$3.3 billion, including loans approved but not closed, ~~decreased $13.5~~increased $12.0 million or 0.4% from December 31, 2019 due primarily to ~~a decrease~~an increase in available lines of credit. The line utilization percentage for the commercial portfolio was ~~44.3%~~35.4% at ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020 compared to 44.5% as of December 31, 2019.

The commercial portfolio is monitored for potential concentrations of credit risk by market, type of lending, CRE property type, C&I and owner-occupied CRE by industry, investment CRE dependence on common tenants and industries or property types that are similarly impacted by external factors.

During the first quarter of 2020, Wesbanco sold ~~$36.7~~$36.4 million of certain under-performing loans acquired from ~~OLBK.~~OLBK, which had a book value of $56.6 million. The majority of these loans settled by March 31, 2020; however, $8.9 million settled in April 2020, and therefore they were classified as loans held for sale as of March 31, 2020. Loans held for sale at September 30, 2020 are originated residential mortgages that are committed to be sold into the secondary market.

Wesbanco ~~is participating~~has participated in the PPP loan program as established by the CARES Act. ~~Starting April 3 through May 4,~~As of September 30, 2020, the Company ~~has approved more than 5,900~~funded nearly 7,200 loans totaling ~~approximately $840~~$853.1 million to qualifying small businesses, non-profits and organizations throughout our six-state ~~market.~~footprint. The loans carry an interest rate of 1%, are generally for a two-year maturity, and were originated with a percentage fee paid by the SBA directly to the Bank depending on the size of the loan originated. At September 30, 2020, remaining un-accreted fees, net of deferred origination costs were $19.5 million. The loans are subject to forgiveness by the SBA under certain defined circumstances, and it is anticipated a high percentage of such loans will meet such requirements (as revised) over the next 12-18 months, although no loans had been forgiven as of September 30, 2020.

March 31, 2020

CRE Land and
Construction

CRE Improved
Investment

CRE Improved
Owner Occupied

(unaudited, in thousands)

Loan
Balance

Loan
Commitment

Loan
Balance

Loan
Commitment

Loan
Balance

Loan
Commitment

Total
Exposure

Largest
Loan (1)

% of
Capital (2)

Land

$
195,993

$
132,431

$
45,055

$
3,665

$
5,333

$
59

$
382,536

$
23,963

25.5

1-to-4 family

67,385

52,133

404,181

14,143

15,550

352

553,744

26,415

36.9

Multi-family

196,092

279,357

426,601

13,445

—

—

915,495

37,238

61.1

Retail

33,101

17,702

560,794

19,396

123,956

2,377

757,326

13,991

50.5

Office

30,229

33,598

467,731

13,841

196,850

3,285

745,534

30,000

49.7

Industrial

7,225

10,935

218,008

2,995

196,126

3,627

438,916

10,844

29.3

Lodging

24,476

24,451

633,083

10,578

14,392

359

707,339

25,000

47.2

Senior living

9,514

86,407

64,374

60

76,892

1,330

238,577

32,000

15.9

Hospital

3,871

4,894

3,311

—

42,813

12

54,901

15,202

3.7

Self-storage

11,958

5,196

11,061

9

3,512

31

31,767

5,425

2.1

Eating place

450

-

51,043

16,754

44,869

646

113,762

17,400

7.6

Gas station

500

1,250

17,290

—

71,521

332

90,893

6,510

6.1

Recreational

2,661

2,883

12,595

—

28,239

442

46,820

5,097

3.1

Dormitory

—

—

36,299

33

23,310

—

59,642

23,150

4.0

House of worship

1,673

—

2,425

1,335

35,946

990

42,369

3,452

2.8

Other special use

3,789

3,334

17,653

260

62,333

13,676

101,045

13,565

6.7

Mixed use

31,606

20,959

302,006

12,839

157,573

9,972

534,955

24,867

35.7

Unclassified

56,203

26,945

441,194

58,044

113,760

3,715

699,861

23,520

46.7

Total

$
676,726

$
702,475

$
3,714,704

$
167,397

$
1,212,975

$
41,205

$
6,515,482

$
37,238

434.6

	September 30, 2020
	Land and Construction				Improved Property				Commercial and Industrial				PPP
(unaudited, in thousands)	Balance		Commitment		Balance		Commitment		Balance		Commitment		Loan Balance		Total Loan Balance		Total Exposure		% of Capital (1)
Agriculture and farming	$	18,099	$	1,687	$	3,497	$	833	$	8,156	$	5,916	$	2,864	$	32,616	$	41,052		2.5
Energy		1,701		—		42,790		2,315		79,408		85,887		10,405		134,304		222,506		13.6
Construction		147,243		97,938		139,471		54,168		182,993		181,425		157,914		627,621		961,152		58.9
Manufacturing		276		4		86,013		8,991		155,076		120,440		76,087		317,452		446,887		27.4
Wholesale and distribution		158		42		44,936		1,830		121,917		57,269		32,554		199,565		258,706		15.8
Retail		2,558		1,172		254,760		7,108		94,838		88,738		41,793		393,949		490,967		30.1
Transportation and warehousing		12,217		5,768		64,738		2,165		39,986		16,295		22,422		139,363		163,591		10.0
Information and communications		65		121		4,062		—		8,089		8,002		4,566		16,782		24,905		1.5
Finance and insurance		216		—		11,300		3,421		91,018		120,425		12,179		114,713		238,559		14.6
Equipment leasing		1,003		108		13,231		275		50,809		36,439		12,973		78,016		114,838		7.0
Real estate - 1-4 family		5,685		3,671		308,441		9,291		76,625		4,025		—		390,751		407,738		25.0
Real estate - multi-family		191,998		158,816		565,921		9,232		2,221		1		—		760,140		928,189		56.8
Real estate - other retail		5,208		8,088		247,184		3,752		5,510		266		—		257,902		270,008		16.5
Real estate - shopping center		974		1,426		247,310		6,200		1,991		—		—		250,275		257,901		15.8
Real estate - office building		31,125		18,033		480,060		8,822		9,040		3,857		—		520,225		550,937		33.7
Real estate - commercial/manufacturing		1,897		2,553		361,678		12,729		10,754		1		—		374,329		389,612		23.9
Real estate - residential buildings		42,959		58,889		137,483		16,076		30,603		12,998		9,395		220,440		308,403		18.9
Real estate - other		69,244		31,050		450,086		29,109		52,173		24,950		7,467		578,970		664,079		40.7
Services		14,875		2,498		200,561		5,481		164,478		111,248		134,208		514,122		633,349		38.8
Schools and education services		18,939		5,081		24,052		539		91,321		15,850		11,640		145,952		167,422		10.3
Healthcare		48,909		59,441		327,433		5,798		116,624		61,932		86,621		579,587		706,758		43.3
Entertainment and recreation		1,294		1,225		50,508		1,530		14,066		4,113		9,103		74,971		81,839		5.0
Hotels		32,309		22,160		689,436		14,750		5,111		542		12,820		739,676		777,128		47.6
Other accommodations		186		511		56,219		315		4,122		390		566		61,093		62,309		3.8
Restaurants		1,537		—		95,870		1,772		66,999		22,683		45,356		209,762		234,217		14.3
Religious organizations		1,420		1,450		82,354		1,476		45,195		21,379		9,349		138,318		162,623		10.0
Government		34,163		2,800		17,366		642		121,772		35,348		5,640		178,941		217,731		13.3
Unclassified		4,289		65,109		11,341		91,130		3,221		74,391		147,197		166,048		396,678		24.3
Total commercial loans	$	690,547	$	549,641	$	5,018,101	$	299,750	$	1,654,116	$	1,114,810	$	853,119	$	8,215,883	$	10,180,084		623.4

Multi-family apartments represents the single largest category of CRE. Including construction loans, multi-family apartment exposure decreased $46.2 million or 4.8% as of March 31, 2020 compared to December 31, 2019. The exposure represents 61.1% of total risk-based capital as of March 31, 2020 compared to 64.2% as of December 31, 2019.

Retail represents the second largest category of CRE with total exposure of $757.3 million as of March 31, 2020. Retail exposure increased $10.9 million or 1.5% compared to December 31, 2019. This category represents 50.5% of total risk-based capital as of March 31, 2020 compared to 49.8% as of December 31, 2019.

Office buildings represent the third largest category of CRE with total exposure of $745.5 million as of March 31, 2020. Office building exposure decreased $42.6 million or 5.4% compared to December 31, 2019. This category represents 49.7% of total risk-based capital compared to 52.6% as of December 31, 2019.

Lodging represents the fourth largest category of CRE with total exposure of $707.3 million as of March 31, 2020. Lodging exposure decreased $49.1 million or 6.5% compared to December 31, 2019. This category represents 47.2% of total risk-based capital compared to 50.5% as of December 31, 2019.

TABLE 12. ~~C&I AND OWNER OCCUPIED CRE EXPOSURE~~COMMERCIAL LOANS MODIFIED UNDER CARES ACT BY INDUSTRY

March 31, 2020

C&I

CRE Improved Owner
Occupied Property

(unaudited, in thousands)

Loan
Balance

Loan
Commitment

Loan
Balance

Loan
Commitment

Total
Exposure

Largest
Loan (1)

% of
Capital (2)

Agriculture and farming

$
8,550

$
5,347

$
994

$
1

$
14,892

$
2,500

1.0

Energy—oil and gas

7,082

14,263

13,367

38

34,750

5,000

2.3

Energy—mining and utilities

46,172

17,030

1,834

—

65,036

11,235

4.3

Construction—general

87,238

77,674

22,189

8,927

196,028

9,926

13.1

Construction—trades

126,927

83,297

40,086

1,854

252,164

17,500

16.8

Manufacturing—primary metals

20,659

29,067

4,182

175

54,083

29,700

3.6

Manufacturing—other

153,059

86,715

48,902

2,448

291,124

26,750

19.4

Wholesale and distribution

117,841

51,171

36,706

580

206,298

30,000

13.8

Retail—automobile dealers

49,375

22,379

36,383

1,983

110,120

8,500

7.3

Retail—other sales

65,263

62,099

119,944

2,903

250,209

10,000

16.7

Transportation and warehousing

43,591

27,678

38,116

891

110,276

13,565

7.4

Information and communications

9,717

2,501

1,715

—

13,933

2,076

0.9

Finance and insurance

73,778

73,210

7,638

50

154,676

15,000

10.3

Equipment leasing

56,382

45,106

10,816

58

112,362

11,355

7.5

Services—real estate

172,373

112,635

251,568

5,108

541,684

11,638

36.1

Services—business and professional

141,108

92,778

45,941

479

280,306

18,713

18.7

Services—personal and other

53,917

17,993

58,270

7,366

137,546

21,555

9.2

Schools and education services

94,732

10,395

25,257

227

130,611

17,441

8.7

Healthcare—medical practitioners

44,237

30,616

63,046

454

138,353

15,971

9.2

Healthcare—hospitals and other

73,233

35,956

148,379

3,289

260,857

30,586

17.4

Entertainment and recreation

10,147

3,653

28,918

1,171

43,889

5,097

2.9

Restaurants and lodging

82,442

23,424

105,874

1,050

212,790

23,150

14.2

Religious organizations

47,559

21,219

61,872

1,106

131,756

15,000

8.8

Government

116,065

58,118

11,078

398

185,659

36,371

12.4

Unclassified

100,304

113,737

29,900

649

244,590

7,500

16.3

Total

$
1,801,751

$
1,118,061

$
1,212,975

$
41,205

$
4,173,992

$
36,371

278.4

	September 30, 2020
	Land and Construction				Improved Property				Commercial and Industrial								Percent Modified
(unaudited, in thousands)	Balance		Commitment		Balance		Commitment		Balance		Commitment		Total Loan Balance		Total Exposure		Balance	Exposure
Agriculture and farming	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	0.0%	0.0%
Energy		—		—		—		—		2,408		—		2,408		2,408	1.8%	1.1%
Construction		7,264		989		—		—		78		—		7,342		8,331	1.2%	0.9%
Manufacturing		—		—		458		—		451		—		909		909	0.3%	0.2%
Wholesale and distribution		—		—		885		—		415		—		1,300		1,300	0.7%	0.5%
Retail		—		—		18,933		—		2,470		—		21,403		21,403	5.4%	4.4%
Transportation and warehousing		—		—		54		—		623		—		677		677	0.5%	0.4%
Information and communications		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—	0.0%	0.0%
Finance and insurance		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—	0.0%	0.0%
Equipment leasing		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—	0.0%	0.0%
Real estate - 1-4 family		—		—		32,306		—		3,051		—		35,357		35,357	9.0%	8.7%
Real estate - multi-family		—		—		16,696		—		—		—		16,696		16,696	2.2%	1.8%
Real estate - other retail		—		—		27,350		—		4,665		—		32,015		32,015	12.4%	11.9%
Real estate - shopping center		—		—		44,853		—		—		—		44,853		44,853	17.9%	17.4%
Real estate - office building		—		—		25,221		375		—		—		25,221		25,596	4.8%	4.6%
Real estate - commercial/manufacturing		—		—		41,062		10		—		—		41,062		41,072	11.0%	10.5%
Real estate - residential buildings		—		—		7,154		—		355		—		7,509		7,509	3.4%	2.4%
Real estate - other		559		—		31,235		1,570		—		—		31,794		33,364	5.5%	5.0%
Services		—		—		7,404		—		2,073		6		9,477		9,483	1.8%	1.5%
Schools and education services		—		—		307		—		3		—		310		310	0.2%	0.2%
Healthcare		50		—		13,688		—		49		—		13,787		13,787	2.4%	2.0%
Entertainment and recreation		—		—		9,758		—		325		—		10,083		10,083	13.4%	12.3%
Hotels		12,702		705		296,868		4,640		17		—		309,587		314,932	41.9%	40.5%
Other accommodations		—		—		40,605		33		—		—		40,605		40,638	66.5%	65.2%
Restaurants		680		—		6,002		—		2,627		—		9,309		9,309	4.4%	4.0%
Religious organizations		—		—		580		—		—		—		580		580	0.4%	0.4%
Government		—		—		836		249		24		—		860		1,109	0.5%	0.5%
Unclassified		—		—		941		—		—		—		941		941	0.6%	0.2%
Total modified commercial loans	$	21,255	$	1,694	$	623,196	$	6,877	$	19,634	$	6	$	664,085	$	672,662	8.1%	6.6%

All of the ~~services~~real estate sectors combined represent the largest industry exposure at ~~$956.1~~$3.8 billion, of which multi-family, office buildings and 1-4 families are the largest categories within real estate. Multi-family makes up $928.2 million or ~~63.7%~~56.8% of total risk-based ~~capital; however these sectors include a wide variety of service-providing businesses. Combined exposure to the service sectors decreased $128.1~~capital, office buildings are $550.9 million or ~~11.8% compared to December 31, 2019. Lessors~~33.7% of ~~non-residential buildings is~~total risk-based capital and 1-4 families are $407.7 million or 25.0% of total risk-based capital. For loan modifications as allowed under the ~~single largest industry group exposure~~CARES Act, $236.5 million or 14.5% of total risk-based capital of real estate sector loans were in ~~the services sector.~~deferral as of September 30, 2020.

The construction sectors combined represent the second largest industry exposure at ~~$447.4~~$961.2 million or ~~29.9%~~58.9% of risk-based capital. ~~Combined exposure increased $145.6~~For loan modifications allowed under the CARES Act, there were $8.3 million or ~~48.3% compared to December 31, 2019. Specialty trade contracts is the single largest industry group~~0.5% of total risk-based capital of construction loans in ~~the construction sector.~~deferral as of September 30, 2020.

The ~~healthcare sectors combined represent~~hotel sector represents the third largest industry exposure at ~~$397.9~~$777.1 million or ~~26.5%~~47.6% of risk-based capital. ~~Combined exposure increased $45.3~~For loan modifications allowed under the CARES Act, there were $314.9 million or ~~12.8% compared to December 31, 2019. Nursing~~19.3% of total risk-based capital of hotel loans in deferral as of September 30, 2020. The majority of these loans were deferred for three months of principal and ~~residential care~~interest with three additional months of principal.

~~The retail sectors combined represent~~ the fourth largest industry exposure at ~~$363.4~~$706.8 million or ~~24.2%~~43.3% of total risk-based capital. ~~Combined exposure increased $11.8~~For loan modifications allowed under the CARES Act, there were $13.8 million or ~~3.4% compared~~0.8% of total risk-based capital of healthcare loans in deferral as of September 30, 2020.

On August 3, 2020, the joint federal regulatory agencies issued a statement, “Joint Statement on Additional Loan Accommodations Related to ~~December 31, 2019. Gasoline stations~~COVID-19”. This statement provides financial institutions with considerations for certain customers nearing the end of their COVID-19 loan deferral period noted above. As per this guidance and in accordance with the CARES Act noted above, Wesbanco is currently developing a plan to assist certain customers with additional deferrals of principal and/or interest, but also requiring detailed financial information from the ~~single largest industry group in~~customer to determine the ~~retail sector.~~financial need, the period of relief to be considered and the type of deferral warranted.

Non-performing assets consist of non-accrual loans and TDRs, other real estate acquired through or in lieu of foreclosure, bank premises held for sale, and repossessed automobiles acquired to satisfy defaulted consumer loans.

(unaudited, dollars in thousands)	March 31, 2020			December 31, 2019			September 30, 2020			December 31, 2019
Non-accrual loans:
Commercial real estate - land and construction	$	205		$	580		$	997		$	580
Commercial real estate - improved property		8,151			6,815			10,410			6,815
Commercial and industrial		2,655			14,313			2,716			14,313
Residential real estate		17,376			16,867			17,492			16,867
Home equity		5,643			5,903			5,327			5,903
Consumer		337			435			324			435
Total non-accrual loans ⁽¹⁾		34,367			44,913			37,266			44,913
TDRs accruing interest:
Commercial real estate - land and construction		—			—			—			—
Commercial real estate - improved property		1,253			1,321			667			1,321
Commercial and industrial		172			191			116			191
Residential real estate		3,611			3,477			3,027			3,477
Home equity		369			411			354			411
Consumer		29			31			27			31
Total TDRs accruing interest ⁽¹⁾		5,434			5,431			4,191			5,431
Total non-performing loans	$	39,801		$	50,344		$	41,457		$	50,344
Other real estate owned and repossessed assets		1,083			4,178			738			4,178
Total non-performing assets	$	40,884		$	54,522		$	42,195		$	54,522
Non-performing loans/total portfolio loans		0.38	%		0.49	%		0.38	%		0.49	%
Non-performing assets/total assets		0.26	%		0.35	%		0.26	%		0.35	%
Non-performing assets/total portfolio loans, other real estate and repossessed assets		0.39	%		0.53	%		0.38	%		0.53	%

Non-performing loans, which consist of non-accrual loans and TDRs, decreased ~~$10.5~~$8.9 million or ~~20.9%~~17.7%, from December 31, 2019, primarily due to one $10.8 million non-accrual relationship ~~paying~~that was paid off ~~a $10.8 million loan.~~in the first quarter of 2020. TDRs balances have remained constant from December 31, 2019 to ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020. (Please see the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional discussion.)

Section 4013 of the CARES Act allows financial institutions the option to temporarily suspend certain requirements under U.S. GAAP related to TDRs for a limited period of time during the COVID-19 pandemic. These customers must meet certain criteria, such as they were in good standing and not more than 30 days past due as of December 31, 2019, as well as other requirements. Based on this guidance, Wesbanco does not classify the COVID-19 loan modifications as TDRs, nor are the customers considered past due with regards to their delayed payments. Upon exiting the loan modification deferral program, the measurement of loan delinquency will resume where it left off upon entry into the program. As of September 30, 2020, Wesbanco has offered three to six months of deferred payments to commercial and retail customers impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic, depending on the type of loan and the industry-type for commercial loans.

Other real estate owned and repossessed assets decreased ~~$3.1~~$3.4 million from December 31, 2019 primarily due to the disposition of one commercial property ~~and~~in the first quarter of 2020 as well as continued efforts to liquidate residential properties.

The following table presents past due and accruing loans excluding non-accrual and TDRs:

(unaudited, dollars in thousands)	March 31, 2020			December 31, 2019			September 30, 2020			December 31, 2019
Loans past due 90 days or more:
Commercial real estate - land and construction	$	804		$	26		$	572		$	26
Commercial real estate - improved property		5,589			4,709			896			4,709
Commercial and industrial		2,623			1,793			1,882			1,793
Residential real estate		3,583			3,643			5,491			3,643
Home equity		894			985			937			985
Consumer		794			457			392			457
Total loans past due 90 days or more		14,287			11,613			10,170			11,613
Loans past due 30 to 89 days:
Commercial real estate - land and construction		1,470			650			961			650
Commercial real estate - improved property		13,244			15,256			3,874			15,256
Commercial and industrial		5,268			5,312			2,776			5,312
Residential real estate		6,378			8,183			4,729			8,183
Home equity		3,392			3,558			2,855			3,558
Consumer		3,053			3,371			2,143			3,371
Total loans past due 30 to 89 days		32,805			36,330			17,338			36,330
Total 30 days or more	$	47,092		$	47,943
Total loans 30 days or more past due							$	27,508		$	47,943
Loans past due 90 days or more and accruing to total portfolio loans		0.14	%		0.11	%		0.09	%		0.11	%
Loans past due 30-89 days and accruing to total portfolio loans		0.32	%		0.35	%		0.16	%		0.35	%

Loans past due 30 days or more and accruing interest excluding non-accruals and TDRs decreased ~~$0.9~~$20.4 million or ~~1.8%~~42.6% from December 31, 2019. These loans continue to accrue interest because they are both well-secured and in the process of collection. Loans 90 days or more past due decreased $1.4 million and represented 0.09% of total loans at September 30, 2020 compared to 0.11% at December 31, 2019. While decreasing overall, loans 90 days past due increased in the residential real estate category, and these loans are secured by underlying real estate. The decrease in the 30 to 89 days past due status was primarily due to ~~a decrease in~~the renewals of OLBK acquired commercial ~~real estate – improved property and residential real estate. These decreases~~lines of credit that were ~~partially offset by an increase in commercial real estate – land and construction.~~being adjusted to WesBanco’s underwriting standards. The 30 – 89 days past due represented ~~0.32%~~0.16% of total loans at ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020 and 0.35% at December 31, 2019. Loans past due 90 days or more increased $2.7 million compared to December 31, 2019 and represented 0.14% of total loans at March 31, 2020 compared to 0.11% at December 31, 2019. The continued low levels of delinquency are the result of management’s continued focus on sound initial underwriting, timely collection of loans at their earliest stage of delinquency, stable unemployment and generally improved economic conditions. The current pandemic is expected to result in increased delinquencies and non-performing loans later in 2020. Loans currently modified as permitted by the regulatory authorities and the CARES Act are not included in Tables 1314 or ~~14,~~15, as they are not considered non-performing TDRs, or past due.

On January 1, 2020, Wesbanco adopted CECL, which resulted in a $41.4 million increase to the allowance for credit losses. Of the $41.4 million, $38.4 million related to the loan portfolio and $3.0 million relate to loan commitments. The effect on retained earnings (tax-effected) was $26.6 million.

As of ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020, the total allowance for credit losses – loans and commitments was ~~$119.8~~$195.9 million of which ~~$114.3~~$185.1 million relates to loans and ~~$5.6~~$10.8 million relates to loan commitments. The allowance for credit losses – loans is ~~1.10%~~1.68% of total portfolio loans as of ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020 compared to 0.51% as of December 31, 2019, when the allowance for loan losses (prior to the adoption of CECL) was $52.4 million. Excluding PPP loans of $853.1 million, the allowance for credit losses – loans is 1.83% of total portfolio loans. As per regulatory guidance, there is no allowance on PPP loans due to their government guarantees by the SBA.

The allowance for credit losses - loans individually-evaluated increased ~~$6.6~~$5.8 million from December 31, 2019 to ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020 due to PCD loans acquired from the OLBK ~~acquisition; however, since these were PCD loans there was no effect on the provision for credit losses.~~acquisition. The allowance for loans collectively-evaluated increased from December 31, 2019 to ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020 by ~~$55.2~~$126.9 million, which includes $31.7 million related to the adoption of CECL as of January 1, 2020.

The allowance for credit losses - loan commitments was ~~$5.6~~$10.8 million at ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020 as compared to $0.9 million as of December 31, 2019, and is included in other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The allowance for credit losses - loan commitments includes a $3.0 million adjustment related to the adoption of CECL as of January 1, 2020.

The allowance for credit losses by loan category, presented in Note 5, “Loans and the Allowance for Credit Losses” of the Consolidated Financial Statements, summarizes the impact of changes in various factors that affect the allowance for loan losses in each segment of the portfolio. The allowance for credit losses under CECL is calculated utilizing the ~~PD /~~ PD/LGD, which is then discounted. PD is the probability the asset will default within a given time frame and LGD is the percentage of the asset not expected to be collected due to ~~default.~~default to net present value. The primary macroeconomic drivers of the quantitative model include forecasts of national unemployment and interest rates, as well as modeling adjustments for changes in prepayment speeds, loan risk grades, portfolio mix, concentrations and loan growth. For the calculation as of ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020, the forecast was based upon a blend of two nationally-recognized published economic ~~data~~forecasts through ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020, and is primarily driven by ~~the~~ national unemployment and interest rate spread forecasts. At quarter-end, national unemployment was projected to peak at ~~8.7%~~8.4%, and subsequently ~~decreases~~decrease to an average of ~~6.5%~~7.6% over the remainder of the forecast period. The improvement in the macroeconomic factors ~~and other model adjustments~~ caused the allowance to decrease slightly from June 30, 2020 to September 30, 2020, however qualitative factors were added to account for the remaining credit risk related to the continuing pandemic, deferred interest on modified loans and certain industry concentrations, along with other qualitative factors, resulting in an increase ~~$29.9~~of $16.6 million from January 1, 2020 to March 31, 2020, net of management’s judgment. The quantitative results were adjusted downward due to the unusual level of governmental assistance provided to those individuals, businesses, non-profit organizations and other institutions impacted by the sudden downturn in the economy affected by the pandemic, as well as the fact that state unemployment rolls have been unusually bolstered by additional federal cash assistance to unemployment recipients and additional qualified individuals that are now able to receive such assistance, which were not considered in the quantitative model.June 30, 2020.

~~Forecasted~~If forecasted projections of national unemployment ~~through April 2020 have increased from~~remain consistent with the forecast utilized by Wesbanco as of ~~March 31, 2020. If forecasted national unemployment continues to rise~~September 30, 2020 throughout ~~2020,~~the rest of the year, this ~~could cause an increase~~may result in less significant future quarterly increases in the ~~Allowance~~allowance for ~~Credit Losses,~~credit losses, assuming other model variables remain relatively constant.

Criticized and classified loans were ~~2.09%~~3.25% of total loans, ~~decreasing~~increasing from 2.17% at December 31, 2019. Criticized and classified loans ~~decreased $6.5~~increased $134.4 million from December 31, 2019 to ~~$216.0~~$356.9 million at ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020, primarily due to ~~one C&I~~revisions in the internal loan grading system to better reflect the credit ~~that was paid off during~~quality of commercial loans. In the ~~first~~third quarter ~~combined with certain under-performing~~of 2020, there were $79.5 million in downgrades to criticized loans ~~acquired from OLBK that were sold during~~within CRE, primarily in the ~~first quarter, which were offset by loan downgrades.~~hospitality industry, but the largest credit for $13.9 million in the nursing home industry is in LCD.

Table 1516 summarizes the allocation of the allowance for credit losses to each category of the loan portfolio. The overall allowance for loans increased due to the ~~reasons noted in~~adoption of CECL. Additionally, the ~~above paragraph. The~~ allowance for ~~commercial and industrial~~credit losses on LCD loan commitments has increased ~~due~~ to ~~the downgrade~~$10.8 million as of ~~a commercial and industrial loan (as previously noted) with a remaining undrawn commitment balance.~~September 30, 2020 driven by seven new un-advanced credits in 2020 for approximately $121.1 million.

TABLE ~~15.~~16. ALLOCATION OF THE ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES – LOANS AND LOAN COMMITMENTS

(unaudited, dollars in thousands)	March 31, 2020		Percent of Total		December 31, 2019		Percent of Total		September 30, 2020		Percent of Total		December 31, 2019		Percent of Total
Allowance for credit losses - loans:
Commercial real estate - land and construction	$	6,442		5.4	$	4,949		9.3	$	13,055		6.7	$	4,949		9.3
Commercial real estate - improved property		52,873		44.1		20,293		38.1		105,966		54.1		20,293		38.1
Commercial and industrial		39,227		32.7		14,116		26.5		43,648		22.3		14,116		26.5
Residential real estate		9,684		8.1		4,311		8.1		12,018		6.1		4,311		8.1
Home equity		1,096		0.9		4,422		8.3		2,076		1.1		4,422		8.3
Consumer		3,886		3.2		2,951		5.5		7,004		3.6		2,951		5.5
Deposit account overdrafts		1,064		0.9		1,387		2.6		1,342		0.7		1,387		2.6
Total allowance for credit losses - loans	$	114,272		95.3	$	52,429		98.4	$	185,109		94.6	$	52,429		98.4
Allowance for credit losses - loan commitments:
Commercial real estate - land and construction	$	5,111		4.3	$	235		0.4	$	8,725		4.4	$	235		0.4
Commercial real estate - improved property		—		0.0		22		0.0		—		0.0		22		0.0
Commercial and industrial		—		0.0		311		0.6		1,440		0.7		311		0.6
Residential real estate		444		0.4		15		0.0		594		0.3		15		0.0
Home equity		17		0.0		250		0.5		67		0.0		250		0.5
Consumer		—		0.0		41		0.1		3		0.0		41		0.1
Total allowance for credit losses - loan commitments		5,572		4.7		874		1.6		10,829		5.4		874		1.6
Total allowance for credit losses - loans and loan commitments	$	119,844		100.0	$	53,303		100.0	$	195,938		100.0	$	53,303		100.0

Although the allowance for credit losses is allocated as described in Table ~~15,~~16, the total allowance is available to absorb actual losses in any category of the loan portfolio. However, differences between management’s estimation of probable losses and actual incurred losses in subsequent periods for any category may necessitate future adjustments to the ~~provision~~allowance for ~~loan~~credit losses applicable to the category. Management believes the allowance for credit losses is appropriate to absorb expected losses at ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020.

(unaudited, dollars in thousands)	March 31, 2020		December 31, 2019		$ Change			% Change			September 30, 2020		December 31, 2019		$ Change			% Change
Deposits
Non-interest bearing demand	$	3,191,713	$	3,178,270	$	13,443			0.4		$	4,073,305	$	3,178,270	$	895,035			28.2
Interest bearing demand		2,388,406		2,316,855		71,551			3.1			2,633,601		2,316,855		316,746			13.7
Money market		1,539,835		1,518,314		21,521			1.4			1,619,410		1,518,314		101,096			6.7
Savings deposits		1,984,057		1,934,647		49,410			2.6			2,167,597		1,934,647		232,950			12.0
Certificates of deposit		1,939,321		2,055,920		(116,599	)		(5.7	)		1,707,512		2,055,920		(348,408	)		(16.9	)
Total deposits	$	11,043,332	$	11,004,006	$	39,326			0.4		$	12,201,425	$	11,004,006	$	1,197,419			10.9

Deposits, which represent Wesbanco’s primary source of funds, are offered in various account forms at various rates through Wesbanco’s ~~236~~235 financial centers. The FDIC insures deposits up to $250,000 per account. The CARES Act provided the authorization to the FDIC to allow for a temporary increase in the insured limit through December 31, ~~2020.~~2020, which has not yet been adopted.

Total deposits increased by ~~$39.3 million~~$1.2 billion or ~~0.4%~~10.9% during the first ~~three~~nine months of 2020. ~~Interest~~Non-interest bearing demand deposits, interest bearing demand deposits, savings deposits, and money market deposits increased 28.2%, 13.7%, 12.0% and ~~non-interest bearing demand deposits increased 3.1%, 2.6%, 1.4%, and 0.4%~~6.7%, respectively. The growth in transaction-based accounts is primarily attributable to the OLBK acquisition, marketing, customer incentives, focused retail and business strategies to obtain more account relationships and customers’ preferences for shorter-term maturities. The transaction-based accounts increased towards the end of the first quarter and into the second quarter from the CARES Act individual and family payments, as well as deposits from ~~the~~ small businesses obtaining loans from the PPP ~~program.~~program along with higher savings rates and lower overall consumer spending. Deposit balances were also impacted by bonus and royalty payments for Marcellus and Utica shale gas payments from energy companies in Wesbanco’s southwestern Pennsylvania, eastern Ohio and northern West Virginia markets. Money market deposits were influenced through Wesbanco’s participation in the Insured Cash Sweep (ICS®) money market deposit program. ICS® reciprocal balances totaled ~~$234.7~~$375.6 million at ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020 compared to $232.2 million at December 31, 2019.

Certificates of deposit decreased ~~$116.6~~$348.4 million due primarily to the effects of an overall corporate strategy designed to increase and remix retail deposit relationships and reduce single-service customers with a focus on overall products that can be offered at a lower cost to Wesbanco. The decline was also impacted by customer run-off of higher cost certificates of deposit from the OLBK ~~acquisition.~~acquisition and customer preference for other account types in the current lower interest rate environment. Wesbanco does not generally solicit brokered or other deposits out-of-market or over the internet, but does participate in the Certificate of Deposit Account Registry Services (CDARS®) program. CDARS® balances totaled ~~$90.3~~$46.5 million in outstanding balances at ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020, of which ~~$36.8~~$3.0 million represented one-way buys, compared to $73.3 million in total outstanding balances at December 31, 2019, of which $11.8 million represented one-way buys. Certificates of deposit greater than $250,000 were approximately ~~$495.4~~$404.7 million at ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020 compared to $524.2 million at December 31, 2019. Certificates of deposit of $100,000 or more were approximately ~~$1.1 billion~~$900.4 million at ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020 compared to $1.2 billion at December 31, 2019. Certificates of deposit totaling approximately ~~$1.2~~$1.1 billion at ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020 with a cost of ~~1.45%~~1.03% are scheduled to mature within the next 12 months. Wesbanco intends to continue to focus on its core deposit strategies and improving its overall mix of transaction accounts to total deposits. From time to time, the Bank may offer special promotions or match competitor rates on certain certificates of deposit maturities and savings products based on competition, sales strategies, liquidity needs and wholesale borrowing costs.

(unaudited, dollars in thousands)	March 31, 2020		December 31, 2019		$ Change			% Change			September 30, 2020		December 31, 2019		$ Change			% Change
Federal Home Loan Bank Borrowings	$	1,585,608	$	1,415,615	$	169,993			12.0		$	794,621	$	1,415,615	$	(620,994	)		(43.9	)
Other short-term borrowings		333,966		282,362		51,604			18.3			381,909		282,362		99,547			35.3
Subordinated debt and junior subordinated debt		192,008		199,869		(7,861	)		(3.9	)		192,150		199,869		(7,719	)		(3.9	)
Total	$	2,111,582	$	1,897,846	$	213,736			11.3		$	1,368,680	$	1,897,846	$	(529,166	)		(27.9	)

While borrowings are a significant source of funding for Wesbanco, they are less significant as compared to total deposits. During the first ~~three~~nine months of 2020, FHLB borrowings ~~increased $170.0~~decreased $621.0 million, as $1.1 billion in maturities and other principal pay downs offset $475.0 million in new ~~advances offset $305.0 million in maturities, other principal paydowns and purchase accounting amortization.~~advances. The average cost during the first ~~three~~nine months of 2020 of maturing and paid-off FHLB borrowings was ~~2.04%~~1.99%, compared to the average cost of 1.38% for new FHLB advances during the period.

Other short-term borrowings, which may consist of federal funds purchased, callable repurchase agreements, overnight sweep checking accounts, and borrowings on a revolving line of credit, were ~~$334.0~~$381.9 million at ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020 compared to $282.4 million at December 31, 2019. The increase is primarily due to a ~~$49.1~~$61.3 million increase in overnight sweep checking accounts, coupled with a ~~$10.0~~$45.8 million increase in callable repurchase agreements, which were partially offset by a $7.5 million decrease in federal funds purchased.

Subordinated debt and junior subordinated debt were ~~$192.0~~$192.2 million at ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020 compared to $199.9 million at December 31, 2019. The decrease is primarily a result of the redemption of $6.7 million in junior subordinated debt during the first ~~three~~six months of 2020, ~~which were~~ assumed in the Old Line acquisition.

Wesbanco renewed ~~and increased~~ a revolving line of credit in August ~~2019,~~2020, which is a senior obligation of the parent company, with another financial institution. This line of credit, which accrues interest at an adjusted LIBOR rate, provides for aggregate unsecured borrowings of up to $30.0 million. There were no outstanding balances at either ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020 or December 31, 2019.

Wesbanco enters into financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit, letters of credit, loans approved but not closed, overdraft limits and contingent obligations to purchase loans funded by other entities. Since many of these commitments expire unused or partially used, these commitments may not reflect future cash requirements. Please refer to Note 11, “Commitments and Contingent Liabilities,” of the Consolidated Financial Statements and the “Loans and Credit Risk” section of this MD&A for additional information.

The allowance for credit losses includes an allowance for unfunded loan commitments. The allowance for credit losses represents the lifetime expected losses for all loans and unfunded loan commitments at the initial recognition date. The allowance incorporates forward-looking information and applies a reversion methodology beyond the reasonable and supportable forecast. The allowance is increased by a provision charged to operating expense and reduced by charge-offs, net of recoveries, which also includes any necessary adjustments to the reserve for unfunded loan commitments, and such reserve is accounted for in other liabilities. Management evaluates the appropriateness of the allowance at least quarterly. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires material estimates that may be susceptible to significant change from period to period.

During the first quarter of 2020, Wesbanco extended its contract with its existing core service provider for an additional seven years, which includes upgraded and enhanced technological services. The new contract also includes additional products and services, which were previously obtained from various other third-party service providers. It is currently anticipated that such core services will begin to be converted later this year, through next summer, and that any one-time charges from various contract terminations will be accounted for as of the date of the termination of any such associated contract. In addition to upgrading and enhancing the Company’s technology, reflecting the current operating environment and increased utilization of digital services, Wesbanco announced, on August 27, 2020, a plan to accelerate its financial center optimization strategy. This plan consolidates a total of 25 existing locations and converts two others to drive-up only locations across Indiana, Kentucky, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and West Virginia. One location closed during the last week of September, two others are slated for closure during the fourth quarter of 2020, and the remainder will close on or about January 22, 2021. Cost savings of approximately $6.0 to $6.5 million are expected to be phased-in during the first half of 2021. During the next few quarters, including the third quarter of 2020, Wesbanco anticipates incurring total charges of approximately $3.5 to $4.0 million due to the disposition of assets, lease terminations, severance and other costs associated with the closures, of which $3.0 million was incurred during the third quarter of 2020. Staff at the locations being consolidated will be given the opportunity to fill certain open positions at other nearby financial centers.

Shareholders' equity ~~decreased $7.9~~increased $139.0 million or ~~0.3%~~5.4% from $2.6 billion at December 31, 2019. ~~The decrease resulted primarily~~During the third quarter, Wesbanco issued 6.0 million depositary shares, each representing 1/40^th interest in a share of Wesbanco’s 6.75% fixed rate reset non-cumulative perpetual Series A preferred stock with a liquidation preference of $1,000 per share in a registered public offering to both retail and institutional investors. Net proceeds from the transaction after underwriting discounts and offering costs were approximately $144.5 million and are available to support Wesbanco’s obligations including payments related to outstanding indebtedness, to support the capital needs of the company and the bank, and for other general corporate purposes. Additionally, shareholders’ equity was positively impacted by net income during the current nine-month period of $69.2 million and a $37.1 million other comprehensive income gain. Such factors were partially offset by the retained earnings effect of the January 1, 2020 CECL adoption totaling $26.6 million, the repurchase of common shares and restricted stock vesting activity totaling ~~$25.0~~$25.3 million, and the declaration of common shareholder dividends totaling ~~$21.4~~$64.4 million for the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~March 31, 2020, which were partially offset by net income during the current three-month period of $23.4 million and a $39.9 million other comprehensive income gain.~~September 30, 2020. Wesbanco also increased its quarterly dividend rate $0.01 per quarter to $0.32 per share in February, representing a 3.2% increase over the prior quarterly rate, and a cumulative 129% increase since 2010.

Wesbanco purchased in the first quarter 786,010 shares of its common stock on the open market at a total cost of $25.0 million, or $31.77 per share ~~during the three-month period ended March 31, 2020~~ under the current share repurchase plans, before suspending the share buyback program in early March, in an abundance of caution related to the growing COVID-19 pandemic. At ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020, the remaining shares authorized to be purchased under the current repurchase plans totaled ~~1,730,283~~1,704,457 shares.

In February 2020, Wesbanco granted 12,000 Total Shareholder Return Plan (“TSR”) shares for the performance period beginning January 1, 2020 and ending December 31, 2022 to certain executives. The award is determined at the end of the three-year period if the TSR of Wesbanco common stock is equal to or greater than the 50^th percentile of the TSR of the peer group. The number of shares to be earned by the participant shall be 200% of the grant-date award if the TSR of Wesbanco common stock is equal to or greater than the 75^th percentile of the TSR of the peer group. Upon achieving the market-based metric, shares determined to be earned by the participant become time-based and vest in three equal annual installments.

On May 26, 2020, Wesbanco granted 142,600 stock options to selected officers at an exercise price of $21.55. These options are service-based and vest 50% at December 31, 2020 and 50% at December 31, 2021. On the same date, Wesbanco also issued 169,291 shares of time-based restricted stock to selected officers and 30,298 shares of performance-based restricted stock to selected officers. The time-based restricted shares are service-based and cliff-vest 36 months from the date of grant. The performance-based restricted shares have a three-year performance period, beginning on January 1, 2021, based on Wesbanco’s return on average assets and return on average tangible common equity measured for each year, compared to a national peer group of peer financial institutions.

Regulatory guidelines require bank holding companies and commercial banks to maintain certain minimum capital ratios and define companies as “well capitalized” that sufficiently exceed the minimum ratios. At ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020, regulatory capital levels for both the Bank and Wesbanco were substantially greater than the minimum amounts needed to be considered “well capitalized” under the regulations. There are various legal limitations under federal and state laws that limit the payment of dividends from the Bank to Wesbanco. As of ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020, under FDIC regulations, Wesbanco could receive, without prior regulatory approval, a dividend of approximately ~~$156.8~~$246.5 million from the Bank. Wesbanco expects to continue to improve its consolidated and Bank capital ratios as necessary over time, to fund organic growth and acquisitions, primarily from retaining a majority of its earnings. The tier 1 leverage ratio decreased from December 31, 2019 to September 30, 2020 due to the full impact of OLBK’s acquired assets in 2020 due to the calculations’ use of average assets and period end capital, which impacted the fourth quarter 2019 ratios as the OLBK acquisition closed in mid-quarter. The tier 1 leverage ratio was further impacted by the PPP loans originated in the second and third quarters of 2020, affecting total assets.

On March 26, 2020, regulators issued interim financial rule (“IFR”) “Regulatory Capital Rule: Revised Transition of the Current Expected Losses Methodology for Allowances” in response to the disrupted economic activity from the spread of COVID-19. The IFR provides financial institutions that adopt CECL during 2020 with the option to delay for two years the estimated impact of CECL on regulatory capital, followed by a three-year transition period to phase out the aggregate amount of the capital benefit provided by the initial two-year delay (“five year transition”). Wesbanco adopted CECL effective January 1, 2020 and elected to implement the five year transition. Regulatory capital levels without the capital benefit at ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020 for both the Bank and Wesbanco would have continued to be greater than the amounts needed to be considered “well capitalized” as the capital benefit approximated 30 to 50 basis points for three of the four regulatory ratios, while total risk-based capital would have been slightly higher without the transition.

The following table summarizes risk-based capital amounts and ratios for Wesbanco and the Bank for the periods indicated:

							March 31, 2020							December 31, 2019													September 30, 2020							December 31, 2019
	Minimum			Well								Minimum							Minimum		Minimum			Well-								Minimum							Minimum
(unaudited, dollars in thousands)	Value ⁽¹⁾			Capitalized ⁽²⁾			Amount		Ratio			Amount ⁽¹⁾		Amount		Ratio			Amount ⁽¹⁾		Value⁽¹⁾			Capitalized⁽²⁾			Amount		Ratio			Amount⁽¹⁾		Amount		Ratio			Amount⁽¹⁾
Wesbanco, Inc.
Tier 1 leverage		4.00	%		5.00	%	$	1,409,532		9.64	%	$	584,848	$	1,441,738		11.30	%	$	510,306		4.00	%		5.00	%	$	1,583,755		10.18	%	$	622,018	$	1,441,738		11.30	%	$	510,306
Common equity Tier 1		4.50	%		6.50	%		1,409,532		12.51	%		507,158		1,441,738		12.89	%		503,486		4.50	%		6.50	%		1,439,226		12.99	%		498,631		1,441,738		12.89	%		503,486
Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets		6.00	%		8.00	%		1,409,532		12.51	%		676,210		1,441,738		12.89	%		671,314		6.00	%		8.00	%		1,583,755		14.29	%		664,841		1,441,738		12.89	%		671,314
Total capital to risk-weighted assets		8.00	%		10.00	%		1,671,688		14.83	%		901,614		1,691,764		15.12	%		895,086		8.00	%		10.00	%		1,903,312		17.18	%		886,455		1,691,764		15.12	%		895,086
Wesbanco Bank, Inc.
Tier 1 leverage		4.00	%		5.00	%	$	1,402,023		9.60	%	$	584,007	$	1,419,968		11.12	%	$	510,591		4.00	%		5.00	%	$	1,478,498		9.52	%	$	621,284	$	1,419,968		11.12	%	$	510,591
Common equity Tier 1		4.50	%		6.50	%		1,402,023		12.34	%		511,137		1,419,968		12.74	%		501,713		4.50	%		6.50	%		1,478,498		13.09	%		507,908		1,419,968		12.74	%		501,713
Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets		6.00	%		8.00	%		1,402,023		12.34	%		681,517		1,419,968		12.74	%		668,951		6.00	%		8.00	%		1,478,498		13.09	%		677,211		1,419,968		12.74	%		668,951
Total capital to risk-weighted assets		8.00	%		10.00	%		1,499,180		13.20	%		908,689		1,498,494		13.44	%		891,935		8.00	%		10.00	%		1,633,056		14.47	%		902,948		1,498,494		13.44	%		891,935

Liquidity is defined as a financial institution’s capacity to meet its cash and collateral obligations at a reasonable cost. Liquidity risk is the risk that an institution’s financial condition or overall safety and soundness is adversely affected by an inability, or perceived inability, to meet its obligations. An institution’s obligations, and the funding sources to meet them, depend significantly on its business mix, balance sheet structure, and the cash flows of its on- and off-balance sheet obligations. Institutions confront various internal and external situations that can give rise to increased liquidity risk including funding mismatches, market constraints on funding sources, contingent liquidity events, changes in economic conditions, and exposure to credit, market, operation, legal and reputation risk. Wesbanco actively manages liquidity risk through its ability to provide adequate funds to meet changes in loan demand, unexpected outflows in deposits and other borrowings as well as to take advantage of market opportunities

and meet operating cash needs. This is accomplished by maintaining liquid assets in the form of securities, sufficient borrowing capacity and a stable core deposit base. Liquidity is centrally monitored by Wesbanco’s Asset/Liability Committee (“ALCO”).

Wesbanco determines the degree of required liquidity by the relationship of total holdings of liquid assets to the possible need for funds to meet unexpected deposit losses and/or loan demands. The ability to quickly convert assets to cash at a minimal loss is a primary function of Wesbanco’s investment portfolio management. Wesbanco believes its cash flow from the loan portfolio, the investment portfolio, and other sources, adequately meet its liquidity requirements. Wesbanco’s net loans to assets ratio was ~~64.0%~~65.3% at ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020 and deposit balances funded ~~69.0%~~73.7% of assets.

The following table lists the sources of liquidity from assets at ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020 expected within the next year:

(unaudited, in thousands)
Cash and cash equivalents	$	593,872	$	760,266
Securities with a maturity date within the next year and callable securities		306,510		276,803
Projected payments and prepayments on mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations ⁽¹⁾		379,692		713,406
Loans held for sale		48,021		134,151
Accruing loans scheduled to mature		1,159,164		1,228,468
Normal loan repayments		2,516,522		1,940,633
Total sources of liquidity expected within the next year	$	5,003,781	$	5,053,727

Deposit flows are another principal factor affecting overall Wesbanco liquidity. Deposits totaled ~~$11.0~~$12.2 billion at ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020. Deposit flows are impacted by current interest rates, products and rates offered by Wesbanco versus various forms of competition, as well as customer behavior. Certificates of deposit scheduled to mature within one year totaled ~~$1.2~~$1.1 billion at ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020, which includes jumbo regular certificates of deposit totaling ~~$640.9~~$550.8 million with a weighted-average cost of ~~1.77%~~1.23%, and jumbo CDARS^® deposits of ~~$79.3~~$35.9 million with a weighted-average cost of ~~1.60%~~0.78%.

Wesbanco maintains a line of credit with the FHLB as an additional funding source. Available credit with the FHLB approximated ~~$2.9~~$3.5 billion and $3.2 billion at ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively. The FHLB requires securities to be specifically pledged to the FHLB and maintained in a FHLB-approved custodial arrangement if the member wishes to include such securities in the maximum borrowing capacity calculation. Wesbanco has elected not to specifically pledge to the FHLB otherwise unpledged securities. At ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020, the Bank had unpledged available-for-sale securities with an amortized cost of ~~$345.8~~$262.5 million. A portion of these securities could be sold for additional liquidity, or such securities could be pledged to secure additional FHLB borrowings. Available liquidity through the sale of investment securities is currently limited, as only approximately ~~16.2%~~13.6% of the available-for-sale portfolio is unpledged, due to the pledging agreements that Wesbanco has with their public deposit customers. Public deposit balances have increased significantly through the ~~ESB, YCB, FTSB, FFKT and OLBK acquisitions.~~several acquisitions made since 2015, to a total of $1.4 billion at September 30, 2020. Wesbanco’s held-to-maturity portfolio currently contains ~~$587.8~~$537.6 million of unpledged securities. Most of these securities are tax-exempt municipal securities, which can only be pledged in limited circumstances. Except for certain limited, special circumstances, these securities cannot be sold without tainting the remainder of the held-to-maturity portfolio. If tainting occurs, all remaining securities with the held-to-maturity designation would be required to be reclassified as available-for-sale, and the held-to-maturity designation would not be available to Wesbanco for ~~some~~a period of time.

Wesbanco participates in the Federal Reserve Bank’s Borrower-in-Custody Program (“BIC”) whereby Wesbanco pledges certain consumer loans as collateral for borrowings. At ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020, Wesbanco had a BIC line of credit totaling ~~$211.5~~$196.5 million, none of which was outstanding. Alternative funding sources may include the utilization of existing overnight lines of credit with third party banks totaling $275.0 million, none of which was outstanding at ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020, along with seeking other lines of credit, borrowings under repurchase agreement lines, increasing deposit rates to attract additional funds, accessing brokered deposits, or selling securities available-for-sale or certain types of loans.

Other short-term borrowings of ~~$334.0~~$381.9 million at ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020 consisted of callable repurchase agreements and overnight sweep checking accounts for large commercial ~~customers, and~~customers. Other short-term borrowings may also include federal funds purchased. There has been an increase of ~~$20.9~~$28.0 million in the average deposit balances of overnight sweep checking accounts during the first ~~three~~nine months of 2020, primarily from the OLBK acquisition. The overnight sweep checking accounts require U.S. Government securities to be pledged equal to or greater than the average deposit balance in the related customer accounts.

The principal sources of parent company liquidity are dividends from the Bank, ~~$147.9~~$247.0 million in cash and investments on hand, and a $30.0 million revolving line of credit with another bank, which did not have an outstanding balance at ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020. Wesbanco is in compliance with all applicable loan covenants. There are various legal limitations under federal and state laws that limit the payment of dividends from the Bank to the parent company. As of ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020, under FDIC and State of West Virginia regulations, Wesbanco could receive, without prior regulatory approval, dividends of approximately ~~$156.8~~$246.5 million from the Bank. Management believes these are appropriate levels of cash for the parent company given the current environment. Management continuously monitors the adequacy of parent company cash levels and sources of liquidity through the use of metrics that relate current cash levels to historical and forecasted cash inflows and outflows.

Wesbanco had outstanding commitments to extend credit in the ordinary course of business approximating ~~$3.2 billion and~~ $3.3 billion at ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively. On a historical basis, only a portion of these commitments will result in an outflow of funds. Please refer to Note 11, “Commitments and Contingent Liabilities” of the Consolidated Financial Statements and the “Loans and Credit Risk” section of this MD&A for additional information.

Federal financial regulatory agencies previously issued guidance in 2009 to provide for sound practices for managing funding and liquidity risk and strengthening liquidity risk management practices. Wesbanco maintains a comprehensive management process for identifying, measuring, monitoring, and controlling liquidity risk, which is fully integrated into its risk management process. Management believes Wesbanco has sufficient

current liquidity to meet current obligations to borrowers, depositors and others and that Wesbanco’s current liquidity risk management policies and procedures, as periodically reviewed and adjusted, adequately address this guidance.

The disclosures set forth in this item are qualified by the section captioned “Forward-Looking Statements” included in Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of this report.

The primary objective of Wesbanco’s Asset/Liability Committee (“ALCO”) is to maximize net interest income within established policy parameters. This objective is accomplished through the management of balance sheet composition, market risk exposures arising from changing economic conditions and liquidity risk.

Market risk is defined as the risk of loss due to adverse changes in the fair value of financial instruments resulting from fluctuations in interest rates and bond prices. Management considers interest rate risk to be Wesbanco’s most significant market risk. Interest rate risk is the exposure to adverse changes in net interest income due to changes in interest rates. The consistency of Wesbanco’s net interest income is largely dependent on effective management of interest rate risk. As interest rates change in the market, rates earned on interest rate-sensitive assets and rates paid on interest rate-sensitive liabilities do not necessarily move concurrently. Differing rate sensitivities may arise because fixed rate assets and liabilities may not have the same maturities, or because variable rate assets and liabilities differ in the timing and/or the percentage of rate changes.

Wesbanco’s ALCO is an executive management committee with Board representation, responsible for monitoring and managing interest rate risk within approved policy limits, utilizing earnings sensitivity simulation and economic value-at-risk models. These models are highly dependent on various assumptions, which change regularly as the balance sheet and market interest rates change. The key assumptions and strategies employed are analyzed, reviewed and documented at least quarterly by the ALCO.

The earnings sensitivity simulation model projects changes in net interest income resulting from the effects of changes in interest rates. Forecasting changes in net interest income requires management to make certain assumptions regarding loan and security prepayment rates, call dates, changes to deposit product betas and non-maturity deposit decay rates, which may not necessarily reflect the manner in which actual cash flows, yields, and costs respond to changes in market interest rates. Assumptions are based on historical experience, current market rates and economic forecasts, and are internally back-tested and periodically reviewed by a third-party consultant. The net interest income sensitivity results presented in Table 1, “Net Interest Income Sensitivity,” assumes that the balance sheet composition of interest sensitive assets and liabilities existing at the end of the period remains constant over the period being measured and also assumes that a particular change in interest rates is reflected uniformly across the yield curve, regardless of the duration of the maturity or re-pricing of specific assets and liabilities. Since the assumptions used in the model relative to changes in interest rates are uncertain, the simulation analysis may not be indicative of actual results. In addition, this analysis does not consider actions that management might employ in response to changes in interest rates, as well as changes in earning asset and costing liability balances.

Interest rate risk policy limits are determined by measuring the anticipated change in net interest income over a twelve-month period, assuming immediate and sustained market interest rate increases and decreases of 100 - 300 basis points across the entire yield curve, as compared to a stable rate environment or base model. Wesbanco’s current policy limits this exposure for the noted interest rate changes to a reduction of between 10% - 15%, or less, of net interest income from the stable rate base model over a twelve-month period. The table below indicates Wesbanco’s interest rate sensitivity at ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, assuming the above-noted interest rate increases, as compared to a base model. In the current interest rate environment, particularly for short-term rates, the 100 – 300 basis points decreasing changes for ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020 and the 200 – 300 basis points decreasing changes for December 31, 2019 are not shown due to the unrealistic and/or negative yield nature of the results.

Immediate Change in	Percentage Change in			Percentage Change in
Interest Rates	Net Interest Income from Base over One Year		ALCO	Net Interest Income from Base over One Year		ALCO
(basis points)	March 31, 2020	December 31, 2019	Guidelines	September 30, 2020	December 31, 2019	Guidelines
+300	7.8%	5.6%	(15.0%)	12.1%	5.6%	(15.0%)
+200	5.7%	3.9%	(12.5%)	8.4%	3.9%	(10.0%)
+100	3.4%	2.2%	(10.0%)	4.6%	2.2%	(7.5%)
-100	N/A	(4.2%)	(10.0%)	N/A	(4.2%)	(7.5%)

Adjustments to relative sensitivities are due to the impact of the current lower rate and yield curve environment on base case net interest income and the related calculation of parallel rate shock changes in rising and falling rate scenarios. Additional differences typically result from changes in the various earning assets and costing liabilities mix and growth rates, as well as adjustments for various modeling assumptions. Generally, deposit betas utilized in modeling are estimated at more conservative percentages for both up and down rate scenarios than has been the Bank’s historical experience, as a result of both competitive factors in our markets and as public funds and institutional contract terms are renewed. Deposit betas, decay rates and loan prepayment speeds are adjusted periodically in our models for non-maturity deposits and loans. Indicated model asset sensitivity in rising rate scenarios may be less than anticipated due to slower prepayment speeds, rate floors, below forecast loan yields, spread compression between new asset yields and funding costs, mortgage-related extension risk and other factors. In a decreasing rate environment, asset sensitivity may have greater impact on the margin than currently modeled as prepayment speeds increase, customers refinance or request rate reductions on existing loans, estimated deposit betas do not perform as modeled, or for other reasons.

In addition to the aforementioned parallel rate shock earnings sensitivity simulation model, the ALCO also reviews a “dynamic” forecast scenario to project net interest income over a rolling two-year time period. This forecast is updated at least quarterly, incorporating revisions and updated assumptions into the model for estimated loan and deposit growth, expected balance sheet re-mixing strategies, changes in forecasted rates for various maturities, competitive market spreads for various products and other assumptions. Such modeling is directionally consistent with typical parallel rate shock scenarios, and it assists in predicting changes in forecasted outcomes and potential adjustments to management plans to assist in achieving earnings goals.

Wesbanco also periodically measures the economic value of equity (“EVE”), which is defined as the market value of tangible equity in various rate scenarios. Generally, changes in the economic value of equity relate to changes in various assets and liabilities, changes in the yield curve, as well as changes in loan prepayment speeds and deposit decay rates. The following table presents these results and Wesbanco’s policy limits as of ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019. Changes in EVE sensitivity since year-end 2019 relate to the significant decrease in market interest rates, particularly in the latter half of the first quarter of 2020, and their impact upon the fair values of earning assets and costing liabilities:

Immediate Change in	Percentage Change in			Percentage Change in
Interest Rates	Economic Value of Equity from Base over One Year		ALCO	Economic Value of Equity from Base over One Year		ALCO
(basis points)	March 31, 2020	December 31, 2019	Guidelines	September 30, 2020	December 31, 2019	Guidelines
+300	8.4%	2.6%	(30.0%)	8.7%	2.6%	(30.0%)
+200	8.9%	3.4%	(20.0%)	8.3%	3.4%	(20.0%)
+100	7.5%	4.1%	(10.0%)	6.4%	4.1%	(10.0%)
-100	N/A	(5.4%)	(10.0%)	N/A	(5.4%)	(10.0%)

The Bank has significant additional borrowing capacity with the FHLB of Pittsburgh, the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland and various correspondent banks, and may utilize these funding sources or interest rate swap strategies as necessary to lengthen liabilities, offset mismatches in various asset maturities and manage liquidity. CDARS® and ICS® deposits also may be utilized for similar purposes for certain customers seeking higher-yielding instruments or maintaining deposit levels below FDIC insurance limits. Significant balance sheet strategies to assist in managing the net interest margin in the current interest rate environment include:

Management is aware of the significant effect that inflation or deflation has upon interest rates and ultimately upon financial performance. Wesbanco’s ability to cope with inflation or deflation is best determined by analyzing its capability to respond to changing market interest rates, as well as its ability to manage the various elements of non-interest income and expense during periods of increasing or decreasing inflation or deflation. Wesbanco monitors the level and mix of interest-rate sensitive assets and liabilities through ALCO in order to reduce the impact of inflation or deflation on net interest income. Management also controls the effects of inflation or deflation by conducting periodic reviews of the prices, costs and terms of its various products and services, as well as competitive factors, by approving new products and services or adjusting the terms and availability of existing products and services.

In anticipation of the potential discontinuance of the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) at the end of 2021, Wesbanco has created a LIBOR transition committee, which has broken the Company’s transition efforts into two phases. The first phase included adding additional language to new loans that allows Wesbanco to replace LIBOR with an equivalent rate index and adjust the margin to ensure the resulting interest rate is the same as it previously was using LIBOR. Also included in the first phase was Wesbanco transitioning from the LIBOR swap curve to treasury rates when repricing certain loans and originating new loans. The second phase is transitioning current variable loans tied to LIBOR or on a LIBOR swap curve. Wesbanco is tracking the dollar amount and number of loans tied to LIBOR or the LIBOR swap curve, monitoring current industry trends, and engaging its legal counsel to ensure the smooth transition away from LIBOR.

EVALUATION OF DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES— Wesbanco’s Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) have concluded that Wesbanco’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended), based on their evaluation of these controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this Form 10-Q, are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by Wesbanco in the reports it files under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC and that such information is accumulated and communicated to Wesbanco’s management, including its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

LIMITATIONS ON THE EFFECTIVENESS OF CONTROLS— Wesbanco’s management, including the CEO and CFO, does not expect that Wesbanco’s disclosure controls and internal controls will prevent all errors and all fraud. While Wesbanco’s disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance of achieving their objective, no control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide absolute assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the controls.

CHANGES IN INTERNAL CONTROLS—There were no changes in Wesbanco’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during our fiscal quarter ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020 as required to be reported by paragraph (d) of Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, Wesbanco’s internal control over financial reporting.

Wesbanco is involved in various lawsuits, claims, investigations and proceedings, which arise in the ordinary course of business. While any litigation contains an element of uncertainty, Wesbanco does not believe that a material loss related to such proceedings or claims pending or known to be threatened is reasonably possible.

In light of recent developments relating to COVID-19, and as previously disclosed in ~~Item 8.01 of~~ its ~~Current Report~~Quarterly Reports on Form ~~8-K~~10-Q filed with the SEC on ~~April 27,~~May 8, 2020 and July 29, 2020, Wesbanco is supplementing its risk factors contained in Item 1A of its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 28, 2020 (“Annual Report”). The following risk factors should be read in conjunction with the risk factors contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K. Any of the risks described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, as well as any of the risks described below, could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. Additional risks and uncertainties that are not presently known to us or that we deem immaterial may also adversely impact our business or financial results. Moreover, the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic may heighten many of the other risk factors in our Annual Report and any subsequent Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q or Current Report on Form 8-K including, but not limited to, risks of credit deterioration, interest rate changes, rating agency actions, governmental actions, market volatility, theft, fraud, security breaches and technology interruptions. Except as set forth below, there are no material changes related to risk factors from the risk factors described in Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019.

The COVID-19 pandemic is adversely affecting THE OPERATIONS OF us and our customers.

The spread of COVID-19 has created a global public-health crisis that has resulted in widespread volatility and deteriorations in household, business, economic, and market conditions. This pandemic has caused many state governments to enact “shelter in place” orders and the institution of social distancing requirements, which have adversely impacted the economy due to the vast restrictions and forced closures of non-essential businesses during the quarantine period. As a result, many of our customers have been adversely affected by business closures. Accordingly, COVID-19 may result in a significant decrease in our customer’ business and/or cause our customers to be unable to meet existing payment or other obligations to us. These adverse impacts on the businesses of our customers could cause a material adverse effect to our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

NEGATIVE ECONOMIC FACTORS MAY ADVERSELY AFFECT WESBANCO’S FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE.

Negative economic conditions in our markets may adversely affect Wesbanco’s financial performance. Current shelter-in-place orders in many of Wesbanco’s markets of West Virginia, Ohio, western Pennsylvania, Kentucky, southern Indiana and Maryland, will result in negative economic factors depending on the length of such government restrictions. Negative changes in economic and financial market conditions could result in additional deceases in market value of financial instruments, impairment of goodwill and intangible assets and decreases in interest income. A rise in unemployment from the forced closures of non-essential businesses, could have a negative impact on our customers’ ability to repay their loans as well as a decrease in the customer deposit base as they use their savings to pay current expenses. This could result in increased risk of delinquencies, defaults, foreclosures and losses on our loans, negatively impact regional economic conditions, result in a decline in local loan demand, loan originations and deposit availability. Any one or more of these developments could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Additionally, the COVID-19 pandemic has significantly affected the financial markets and has resulted in a number of Federal Reserve actions. Market interest rates have declined significantly. On March 3, 2020, the 10-year Treasury yield fell below 1.00% for the first time, and the Federal Reserve reduced the target federal funds rate by 50 basis points to 1.00% to 1.25%. On March 15, 2020, the Federal Reserve further reduced the target federal funds rate by 100 basis points to between 0.00% to 0.25% and announced a $700 billion quantitative easing program in response to the expected economic downturn caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. The Federal Reserve reduced the interest that it pays on excess reserves from 1.60% to 1.10% on March 3, 2020, and then to 0.10% on March 15, 2020. We expect that these reductions in interest rates, especially if prolonged, could adversely affect our net interest income and margins and our profitability.

MARKET VOLATILITY AND PROLONGED PERIODS OF ECONOMIC STRESS MAY AFFECT WESBANCO’S CAPITAL AND LIQUIDITY.

The COVID-19 pandemic has caused volatility in financial markets and could potentially cause prolonged periods of economic stress. This may result in decreased capital and liquidity. In addition to the potential affects from negative economic conditions noted above, Wesbanco instituted a program to help COVID-19 impacted customers. This program allows a 90 day deferral of loan principal and/or interest payments as long as the customer meets certain requirements. Depending on how many customer apply for this program, Wesbanco’s liquidity could be negatively impacted if a significant number of customers apply and are approved for the deferral of payments. In addition, if these deferrals are not effective in mitigating the effect of COVID-19 on our customers, it may adversely affect our business and results of operations more substantially over a longer period of time. If the economic situation deteriorates, federal and state regulators may also consider taking actions such as suspension of dividends and other capital distributions in order to conserve capital and retain capacity, any of which could adversely impact our business.

The extent to which the COVID-19 pandemic impacts our business, financial condition and results of operation, as well as our regulatory capital and liquidity ratios, will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted, including the scope and duration of the pandemic and the efficacy of actions taken by governmental authorities and other third parties in response to the pandemic.

As of ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020, Wesbanco had two active stock repurchase plans. The first active plan was approved by the Board of Directors on approved October 22, 2015 for 1.0 million shares, and the second active plan was approved by the Board of Directors on December 19, 2019 for 1.7 million shares. Each provides for shares to be repurchased for general corporate purposes, which may include a subsequent resource for potential acquisitions, shareholder dividend reinvestment and employee benefit plans. The timing, price and quantity of purchases are at the discretion of Wesbanco, and the plan may be discontinued or suspended at any time.

Repurchases in the first quarter included open market purchases and those for the KSOP and dividend reinvestment plans. Wesbanco has suspended continuing open market purchases while it assesses the economic impact of the pandemic.

The following table presents the monthly share purchase activity during the quarter ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2020:

Period	Total Number of Shares Purchased		Average Price Paid per Share		Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans		Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans		Total Number of Shares Purchased		Average Price Paid per Share		Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans		Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans
Balance at December 31, 2019								2,516,293
Balance at June 30, 2020																1,707,651

January 1, 2020 to January 31, 2020
Open market repurchases		50,000	$	33.17		50,000		2,466,293
Other transactions (1)		23,613		37.43	N/A		N/A

February 1, 2020 to February 29, 2020
July 1, 2020 to July 31, 2020
Open market repurchases		496,210	$	33.83		496,210		1,970,083		—		—		—		1,707,651
Other repurchases (2)		2		34.17	N/A		N/A			—		—		—		1,707,651
Other transactions (1)		4,366		34.09	N/A		N/A			34,720	$	20.37	N/A		N/A

March 1, 2020 to March 31, 2020
August 1, 2020 to August 31, 2020
Open market repurchases		239,800	$	27.22		239,800		1,730,283		—		—		—		1,707,651
Other repurchases (2)										—		—		—		1,707,651
Other transactions (1)		6,045		24.51	N/A		N/A			533	$	22.33	N/A		N/A
First Quarter 2020

September 1, 2020 to September 30, 2020
Open market repurchases										—		—		—		1,707,651
Other repurchases (2)										3,194	$	22.01		3,194		1,704,457
Other transactions (1)										123		22.76	N/A		N/A
Third Quarter 2020
Open market repurchases		786,010	$	31.77		786,010		1,730,283		—		—		—		1,707,651
Other repurchases (2)		2		34.17	N/A		N/A			3,194	$	22.01		3,194		1,704,457
Other transactions (1)		34,024		34.70	N/A		N/A			35,376		20.41	N/A		N/A
Total		820,036	$	31.89	N/A		N/A			38,570	$	20.54		3,194		1,704,457

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

~~WEST VIRGINIA~~West Virginia		55-0571723
(State of incorporation)		(IRS Employer Identification No.)

1 Bank Plaza, Wheeling, WV		26003
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

Large accelerated filer	☑	Accelerated filer	☐
Non-accelerated filer	☐	Smaller reporting company	☐
		Emerging growth company	☐

	March 31, 2020
	CRE Land and Construction				CRE Improved Investment				CRE Improved Owner Occupied
(unaudited, in thousands)	Loan Balance		Loan Commitment		Loan Balance		Loan Commitment		Loan Balance		Loan Commitment		Total Exposure		Largest Loan (1)		% of Capital (2)
Land	$	195,993	$	132,431	$	45,055	$	3,665	$	5,333	$	59	$	382,536	$	23,963		25.5
1-to-4 family		67,385		52,133		404,181		14,143		15,550		352		553,744		26,415		36.9
Multi-family		196,092		279,357		426,601		13,445		—		—		915,495		37,238		61.1
Retail		33,101		17,702		560,794		19,396		123,956		2,377		757,326		13,991		50.5
Office		30,229		33,598		467,731		13,841		196,850		3,285		745,534		30,000		49.7
Industrial		7,225		10,935		218,008		2,995		196,126		3,627		438,916		10,844		29.3
Lodging		24,476		24,451		633,083		10,578		14,392		359		707,339		25,000		47.2
Senior living		9,514		86,407		64,374		60		76,892		1,330		238,577		32,000		15.9
Hospital		3,871		4,894		3,311		—		42,813		12		54,901		15,202		3.7
Self-storage		11,958		5,196		11,061		9		3,512		31		31,767		5,425		2.1
Eating place		450		-		51,043		16,754		44,869		646		113,762		17,400		7.6
Gas station		500		1,250		17,290		—		71,521		332		90,893		6,510		6.1
Recreational		2,661		2,883		12,595		—		28,239		442		46,820		5,097		3.1
Dormitory		—		—		36,299		33		23,310		—		59,642		23,150		4.0
House of worship		1,673		—		2,425		1,335		35,946		990		42,369		3,452		2.8
Other special use		3,789		3,334		17,653		260		62,333		13,676		101,045		13,565		6.7
Mixed use		31,606		20,959		302,006		12,839		157,573		9,972		534,955		24,867		35.7
Unclassified		56,203		26,945		441,194		58,044		113,760		3,715		699,861		23,520		46.7
Total	$	676,726	$	702,475	$	3,714,704	$	167,397	$	1,212,975	$	41,205	$	6,515,482	$	37,238		434.6

	March 31, 2020
	C&I				CRE Improved Owner Occupied Property
(unaudited, in thousands)	Loan Balance		Loan Commitment		Loan Balance		Loan Commitment		Total Exposure		Largest Loan (1)		% of Capital (2)
Agriculture and farming	$	8,550	$	5,347	$	994	$	1	$	14,892	$	2,500		1.0
Energy—oil and gas		7,082		14,263		13,367		38		34,750		5,000		2.3
Energy—mining and utilities		46,172		17,030		1,834		—		65,036		11,235		4.3
Construction—general		87,238		77,674		22,189		8,927		196,028		9,926		13.1
Construction—trades		126,927		83,297		40,086		1,854		252,164		17,500		16.8
Manufacturing—primary metals		20,659		29,067		4,182		175		54,083		29,700		3.6
Manufacturing—other		153,059		86,715		48,902		2,448		291,124		26,750		19.4
Wholesale and distribution		117,841		51,171		36,706		580		206,298		30,000		13.8
Retail—automobile dealers		49,375		22,379		36,383		1,983		110,120		8,500		7.3
Retail—other sales		65,263		62,099		119,944		2,903		250,209		10,000		16.7
Transportation and warehousing		43,591		27,678		38,116		891		110,276		13,565		7.4
Information and communications		9,717		2,501		1,715		—		13,933		2,076		0.9
Finance and insurance		73,778		73,210		7,638		50		154,676		15,000		10.3
Equipment leasing		56,382		45,106		10,816		58		112,362		11,355		7.5
Services—real estate		172,373		112,635		251,568		5,108		541,684		11,638		36.1
Services—business and professional		141,108		92,778		45,941		479		280,306		18,713		18.7
Services—personal and other		53,917		17,993		58,270		7,366		137,546		21,555		9.2
Schools and education services		94,732		10,395		25,257		227		130,611		17,441		8.7
Healthcare—medical practitioners		44,237		30,616		63,046		454		138,353		15,971		9.2
Healthcare—hospitals and other		73,233		35,956		148,379		3,289		260,857		30,586		17.4
Entertainment and recreation		10,147		3,653		28,918		1,171		43,889		5,097		2.9
Restaurants and lodging		82,442		23,424		105,874		1,050		212,790		23,150		14.2
Religious organizations		47,559		21,219		61,872		1,106		131,756		15,000		8.8
Government		116,065		58,118		11,078		398		185,659		36,371		12.4
Unclassified		100,304		113,737		29,900		649		244,590		7,500		16.3
Total	$	1,801,751	$	1,118,061	$	1,212,975	$	41,205	$	4,173,992	$	36,371		278.4

	September 30, 2020
	Three Months Principal & Interest Plus Three Months Principal Only Deferral		Three Months Interest Only Deferral		Three Months Principal & Interest Deferral		Three and Six Months Principal Only Deferral
(unaudited, in thousands)	Loan Balance		Loan Balance		Loan Balance		Loan Balance		Total Loan Balance
Agriculture and farming	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Energy		—		—		—		2,408		2,408
Construction		—		7,175		128		39		7,342
Manufacturing		458		—		—		451		909
Wholesale and distribution		—		—		885		415		1,300
Retail		2,660		—		15,618		3,125		21,403
Transportation and warehousing		134		—		—		543		677
Information and communications		—		—		—		—		—
Finance and insurance		—		—		—		—		—
Equipment leasing		—		—		—		—		—
Real estate - 1-4 family		29,771		—		1,363		4,223		35,357
Real estate - multi-family		10,473		—		3,960		2,263		16,696
Real estate - other retail		25,433		—		3,392		3,190		32,015
Real estate - shopping center		44,853		—		—		—		44,853
Real estate - office building		22,944		327		1,152		798		25,221
Real estate - commercial/manufacturing		25,988		—		14,462		612		41,062
Real estate - residential buildings		3,395		—		3,759		355		7,509
Real estate - other		28,408		424		1,974		988		31,794
Services		5,018		94		2,386		1,979		9,477
Schools and education services		—		—		257		53		310
Healthcare		831		—		10,104		2,852		13,787
Entertainment and recreation		9,758		—		—		325		10,083
Hotels		94,196		29,939		185,452		—		309,587
Other accommodations		17,455		—		—		23,150		40,605
Restaurants		4,996		—		1,938		2,375		9,309
Religious organizations		130		—		329		121		580
Government		836		—		24		—		860
Unclassified		941		—		—		—		941
Total modified commercial loans	$	328,678	$	37,959	$	247,183	$	50,265	$	664,085

3.1		Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Wesbanco, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of Form 8-K filed by WesBanco, Inc. with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 11, 2020).

4.1		Deposit Agreement, dated August 11, 2020, by and among the Company, Computershare Inc. and Computershare Trust Company, N.A. acting jointly as the depositary, and the holders from time to time of the depositary receipts described therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of Form 8-K filed by Wesbanco, Inc. with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 11, 2020).

4.2		Specimen of Certificate representing the Series A Preferred Stock (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of Form 8-K filed by Wesbanco, Inc. with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 11, 2020).

4.3		Form of Depositary Receipt (included in Exhibit 4.1 hereto).

10.1		Amendment to Loan Documents between Wesbanco, Inc. and PNC Bank, National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Form 8-K filed by Wesbanco, Inc. with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 28, 2020).

31.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Periodic Report Pursuant to Rule 13a-15(e) or Rule 15d-15(e).

31.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Periodic Report Pursuant to Rule 13a-15(e) or Rule 15d-15(e).

32.1		Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

101.INS		Inline XBRL Instance Document (the instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document).

101.SCH		Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

101.CAL		Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

101.DEF		Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

101.LAB		Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document

101.PRE		Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

104		Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101).

	WESBANCO, INC.

Date: ~~May 8,~~October 30, 2020	/s/ Todd F. Clossin
	Todd F. Clossin
	President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)

Date: ~~May 8,~~October 30, 2020	/s/ Robert H. Young
	Robert H. Young
	Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
	(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)