(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☑ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ☑ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☑

As of ~~October 23, 2020,~~November 1, 2021, there were ~~67,218,836~~63,230,486 shares of Wesbanco, Inc. common stock, $2.0833 par value, outstanding.


Item No.	ITEM	Page No.	ITEM	Page No.

	PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION		PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
1	Financial Statements	2	Financial Statements	2
	Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 30, 2020 (unaudited) and December 31, 2019	2	Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 30, 2021 (unaudited) and December 31, 2020	2
	Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019 (unaudited)	3	Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020 (unaudited)	3
	Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019 (unaudited)	4	Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020 (unaudited)	4
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019 (unaudited)	6	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020 (unaudited)	6
	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)	7	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)	7

2	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	37	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	33

3	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	61	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	54

4	Controls and Procedures	63	Controls and Procedures	56

	PART II – OTHER INFORMATION		PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
1	Legal Proceedings	64	Legal Proceedings	57

1A	Risk Factors	64

2	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	65	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	57

6	Exhibits	66	Exhibits	58

	Signatures	67	Signatures	59

	September 30,			December 31,			September 30,			December 31,
(unaudited, in thousands, except shares)	2020			2019			2021			2020
ASSETS
Cash and due from banks, including interest bearing amounts of $544,284 and $51,891, respectively	$	760,266		$	234,796
Cash and due from banks, including interest bearing amounts of $919,611 and $721,086, respectively							$	1,121,116		$	905,447
Securities:
Equity securities, at fair value		12,516			12,343			13,451			13,047
Available-for-sale debt securities, at fair value		2,045,924			2,393,558			2,986,803			1,978,136
Held-to-maturity debt securities (fair values of $782,401 and $874,523, respectively)		746,767			851,753
Held-to-maturity debt securities (fair values of $978,494 and $768,183, respectively)								953,920			731,212
Allowance for credit losses, held-to-maturity debt securities		(461	)		—			(257	)		(326	)
Net held-to-maturity debt securities		746,306			851,753			953,663			730,886
Total securities		2,804,746			3,257,654			3,953,917			2,722,069
Loans held for sale		134,151			43,013			32,308			168,378
Portfolio loans, net of unearned income		10,989,546			10,267,985			9,913,165			10,789,233
Allowance for credit losses - loans		(185,109	)		(52,429	)		(136,605	)		(185,827	)
Net portfolio loans		10,804,437			10,215,556			9,776,560			10,603,406
Premises and equipment, net		248,491			261,014			232,134			249,421
Accrued interest receivable		65,023			43,648			61,895			66,790
Goodwill and other intangible assets, net		1,165,566			1,149,153			1,154,468			1,163,091
Bank-owned life insurance		304,288			299,516			349,735			306,038
Other assets		265,172			215,762			209,978			240,970
Total Assets	$	16,552,140		$	15,720,112		$	16,892,111		$	16,425,610
LIABILITIES
Deposits:
Non-interest bearing demand	$	4,073,305		$	3,178,270		$	4,531,958		$	4,070,835
Interest bearing demand		2,633,601			2,316,855			3,283,444			2,839,536
Money market		1,619,410			1,518,314			1,765,480			1,685,927
Savings deposits		2,167,597			1,934,647			2,488,180			2,214,565
Certificates of deposit		1,707,512			2,055,920			1,354,252			1,618,510
Total deposits		12,201,425			11,004,006			13,423,314			12,429,373
Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings		794,621			1,415,615			208,940			549,003
Other short-term borrowings		381,909			282,362			152,546			241,950
Subordinated debt and junior subordinated debt		192,150			199,869			167,711			192,291
Total borrowings		1,368,680			1,897,846			529,197			983,244
Accrued interest payable		5,014			8,077			2,495			4,314
Other liabilities		244,055			216,262			213,122			251,942
Total Liabilities		13,819,174			13,126,191			14,168,128			13,668,873
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Preferred stock, no par value, 1,000,000 shares authorized in 2020 and 2019, respectively; 150,000 shares 6.75% non-cumulative perpetual preferred stock, Series A, liquidation preference $150,000,000, issued and outstanding at September 30, 2020 and 0 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2019, respectively		144,529			—
Common stock, $2.0833 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized in 2020 and 2019, respectively; 68,081,306 and 68,078,116 shares issued, respectively; 67,216,012 and 67,824,428 shares outstanding, respectively		141,834			141,827
Preferred stock, no par value, 1,000,000 shares authorized; 150,000 shares 6.75% non-cumulative perpetual preferred stock, Series A, liquidation preference $150,000,000, issued and outstanding at September 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively								144,484			144,484
Common stock, $2.0833 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized; 68,081,306 shares issued; 63,838,549 and 67,254,706 shares outstanding at September 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively								141,834			141,834
Capital surplus		1,634,172			1,636,966			1,634,086			1,634,815
Retained earnings		802,892			824,694			946,746			831,688
Treasury stock (865,294 and 253,688 shares - at cost, respectively)		(27,403	)		(9,463	)
Treasury stock (4,242,757 and 826,600 shares - at cost, respectively)								(146,102	)		(25,949	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income		38,301			1,201			4,463			31,359
Deferred benefits for directors		(1,359	)		(1,304	)		(1,528	)		(1,494	)
Total Shareholders' Equity		2,732,966			2,593,921			2,723,983			2,756,737
Total Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity	$	16,552,140		$	15,720,112		$	16,892,111		$	16,425,610

	For the Three Months Ended September 30,						For the Nine Months Ended September 30,				For the Three Months Ended September 30,						For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
(unaudited, in thousands, except shares and per share amounts)	2020			2019			2020		2019		2021			2020			2021			2020
INTEREST AND DIVIDEND INCOME
Loans, including fees	$	116,524			95,369		$	351,095	$	287,287	$	103,206		$	116,524		$	318,532		$	351,095
Interest and dividends on securities:
Taxable		11,669			15,887			42,702		49,061		13,481			11,669			37,467			42,702
Tax-exempt		4,182			4,759			12,940		15,443		4,063			4,182			11,925			12,940
Total interest and dividends on securities		15,851			20,646			55,642		64,504		17,544			15,851			49,392			55,642
Other interest income		1,282			1,333			4,062		4,153		628			1,282			1,836			4,062
Total interest and dividend income		133,657			117,348			410,799		355,944		121,378			133,657			369,760			410,799
INTEREST EXPENSE
Interest bearing demand deposits		1,225			4,489			5,970		12,749		815			1,225			2,859			5,970
Money market deposits		707			1,973			3,937		5,881		350			707			1,488			3,937
Savings deposits		303			861			1,523		2,061		244			303			769			1,523
Certificates of deposit		3,197			3,830			10,765		11,831		1,726			3,197			6,122			10,765
Total interest expense on deposits		5,432			11,153			22,195		32,522		3,135			5,432			11,238			22,195
Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings		5,457			6,645			20,982		19,269		1,192			5,457			5,387			20,982
Other short-term borrowings		304			1,353			1,454		4,392		33			304			192			1,454
Subordinated debt and junior subordinated debt		1,871			2,077			6,400		6,820		1,743			1,871			5,336			6,400
Total interest expense		13,064			21,228			51,031		63,003		6,103			13,064			22,153			51,031
NET INTEREST INCOME		120,593			96,120			359,768		292,941		115,275			120,593			347,607			359,768
Provision for credit losses		16,288			4,121			107,949		9,375		(1,730	)		16,288			(50,714	)		107,949
Net interest income after provision for credit losses		104,305			91,999			251,819		283,566		117,005			104,305			398,321			251,819
NON-INTEREST INCOME
Trust fees		6,426			6,425			19,580		19,880		7,289			6,426			22,069			19,580
Service charges on deposits		5,332			7,056			16,272		19,803		6,050			5,332			15,820			16,272
Electronic banking fees		4,780			5,253			13,100		18,299		5,427			4,780			14,853			13,100
Net securities brokerage revenue		1,725			1,765			4,787		5,597		1,965			1,725			5,318			4,787
Bank-owned life insurance		2,088			1,373			5,609		4,032		2,656			2,088			6,072			5,609
Mortgage banking income		8,488			2,588			17,295		5,262		4,563			8,488			16,656			17,295
Net securities gains		787			235			3,577		3,800
Net (loss) gain on other real estate owned and other assets		(19	)		158			84		670
Net securities (losses) gains												(15	)		787			740			3,577
Net gain (loss) on other real estate owned and other assets												785			(19	)		4,974			84
Other income		5,005			2,097			15,177		8,535		4,035			5,005			15,574			15,177
Total non-interest income		34,612			26,950			95,481		85,878		32,755			34,612			102,076			95,481
NON-INTEREST EXPENSE
Salaries and wages		38,342			32,915			114,025		95,501		39,497			38,342			113,822			114,025
Employee benefits		10,604			9,726			31,115		29,419		10,658			10,604			30,191			31,115
Net occupancy		7,092			5,392			20,809		16,343		6,825			7,092			20,430			20,809
Equipment		6,229			5,273			17,991		14,924
Equipment and software												7,609			6,229			21,654			17,991
Marketing		1,577			1,505			4,282		4,002		1,848			1,577			6,033			4,282
FDIC insurance		1,948			(1,221	)		6,456		1,287		1,227			1,948			2,690			6,456
Amortization of intangible assets		3,346			2,446			10,085		7,424		2,854			3,346			8,622			10,085
Restructuring and merger-related expense		3,608			1,688			9,241		4,876		4,467			3,608			6,540			9,241
Other operating expenses		17,197			15,544			52,775		45,876		19,716			17,197			54,858			52,775
Total non-interest expense		89,943			73,268			266,779		219,652		94,701			89,943			264,840			266,779
Income before provision for income taxes		48,974			45,681			80,521		149,792		55,059			48,974			235,557			80,521
Provision for income taxes		7,669			8,334			11,332		27,295		10,651			7,669			47,445			11,332
Net income		41,305			37,347			69,189		122,497		44,408			41,305			188,112			69,189
Preferred stock dividends		0			0			0		0		2,531			—			7,594			—
Net income available to common shareholders	$	41,305		$	37,347		$	69,189	$	122,497	$	41,877		$	41,305		$	180,518		$	69,189
EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
Basic	$	0.61		$	0.68		$	1.03	$	2.24	$	0.64		$	0.61		$	2.72		$	1.03
Diluted	$	0.61		$	0.68		$	1.03	$	2.24	$	0.64		$	0.61		$	2.71		$	1.03
AVERAGE COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING
Basic		67,214,759			54,695,578			67,268,449		54,641,057		64,931,764			67,214,759			66,354,750			67,268,449
Diluted		67,269,303			54,751,344			67,351,857		54,705,761		65,065,848			67,269,303			66,510,357			67,351,857
DIVIDENDS DECLARED PER COMMON SHARE	$	0.32		$	0.31		$	0.96	$	0.93	$	0.33		$	0.32		$	0.99		$	0.96

COMPREHENSIVE INCOME	$	39,090		$	43,156		$	106,289	$	170,290	$	36,285		$	39,090		$	161,216		$	106,289

	For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2020 and 2019																									For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2021 and 2020
																	Accumulated																									Accumulated
	Preferred		Common Stock														Other			Deferred						Preferred		Common Stock														Other			Deferred
(unaudited, in thousands, except	Stock		Shares					Capital			Retained			Treasury			Comprehensive			Benefits for						Stock		Shares					Capital			Retained			Treasury			Comprehensive			Benefits for
shares and per share amounts)	Amount		Outstanding			Amount		Surplus			Earnings			Stock			Income (Loss)			Directors			Total			Amount		Outstanding			Amount		Surplus			Earnings			Stock			Income (Loss)			Directors			Total
June 30, 2021																										$	144,484		65,970,149		$	141,834	$	1,632,460		$	925,977		$	(74,996	)	$	12,586		$	(1,509	)	$	2,780,836
Net income																											—		—			—		—			44,408			—			—			—			44,408
Other comprehensive loss																											—		—			—		—			—			—			(8,123	)		—			(8,123	)
Comprehensive income																											—		—			—		—			—			—			—			—			36,285
Common dividends declared ($0.33 per share)																											—		—			—		—			(21,108	)		—			—			—			(21,108	)
Preferred dividends declared ($16.875 per share)																											—		—			—		—			(2,531	)		—			—			—			(2,531	)
Treasury shares acquired																											—		(2,138,515	)		—		—			—			(71,346	)		—			—			(71,346	)
Stock options exercised																											—		750			—		(10	)		—			26			—			—			16
Restricted stock granted																											—		6,165			—		(214	)		—			214			—			—			—
Stock compensation expense																											—		—			—		1,836			—			—			—			—			1,836
Deferred benefits for directors- net																											—		—			—		14			—			—			—			(19	)		(5	)
September 30, 2021																										$	144,484		63,838,549		$	141,834	$	1,634,086		$	946,746		$	(146,102	)	$	4,463		$	(1,528	)	$	2,723,983

June 30, 2020	$	—		67,211,192		$	141,827	$	1,633,079		$	782,990		$	(27,518	)	$	40,516		$	(1,373	)	$	2,569,521		$	—		67,211,192		$	141,827	$	1,633,079		$	782,990		$	(27,518	)	$	40,516		$	(1,373	)	$	2,569,521
Net income		—		—			—		—			41,305			—			—			—			41,305			—	—			—		—				41,305		—			—			—				41,305
Other comprehensive loss		—		—			—		—			—			—			(2,215	)		—			(2,215	)		—	—			—		—			—			—				(2,215	)	—				(2,215	)
Comprehensive income		—		—			—		—			—			—			—			—			39,090			—	—			—		—			—			—			—			—				39,090
Common dividends declared ($0.32 per share)		—		—			—		—			(21,403	)		—			—			—			(21,403	)		—	—			—		—				(21,403	)	—			—			—				(21,403	)
Issuance of preferred stock, net of issuance costs		144,529		—			—		—			—			—			—			—			144,529			144,529		—			—		—			—			—			—			—			144,529
Treasury shares acquired		—		(3,209	)		—		—			—			(70	)		—			—			(70	)		—		(3,209	)	—			—		—				(70	)	—			—				(70	)
Stock options exercised		—		3,190			7		52			—			—			—			—			59			—		3,190			7		52			—			—			—			—			59
Restricted stock granted		—		4,839			—		(185	)		—			185			—			—			—			—		4,839		—			(185	)	—				185		—			—				—
Stock compensation expense		—		—			—		1,329			—			—			—			—			1,329			—	—			—			1,329		—			—			—			—				1,329
Deferred benefits for directors- net		—		—			—		(103	)		—			—			—			14			(89	)		—	—			—			(103	)	—			—			—				14			(89	)
September 30, 2020	$	144,529		67,216,012		$	141,834	$	1,634,172		$	802,892		$	(27,403	)	$	38,301		$	(1,359	)	$	2,732,966		$	144,529		67,216,012		$	141,834	$	1,634,172		$	802,892		$	(27,403	)	$	38,301		$	(1,359	)	$	2,732,966

June 30, 2019	$	—		54,697,199		$	113,952	$	1,168,212		$	788,900		$	(2	)	$	4,113		$	(1,059	)	$	2,074,116
Net income		—		—			—		—			37,347			—			—			—			37,347
Other comprehensive income		—		—			—		—			—			—			5,809			—			5,809
Comprehensive income		—		—			—		—			—			—			—			—			43,156
Common dividends declared ($0.31 per share)		—		—			—		—			(16,915	)		—			—			—			(16,915	)
Treasury shares acquired		—		(6,974	)		—		42			—			(250	)		—			—			(208	)
Stock options exercised		—		—			—		—			—			—			—			—			—
Restricted stock granted		—		1,000			2		(2	)		—			—			—			—			—
Stock compensation expense		—		—			—		1,333			—			—			—			—			1,333
Deferred benefits for directors- net		—		—			—		10			—			—			—			(223	)		(213	)
September 30, 2019	$	—		54,691,225		$	113,954	$	1,169,595		$	809,332		$	(252	)	$	9,922		$	(1,282	)	$	2,101,269
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2020 and 2019

Accumulated

Preferred

Common Stock

Other

Deferred

(unaudited, in thousands, except

Stock

Shares

Capital

Retained

Treasury

Comprehensive

Benefits for

shares and per share amounts)

Amount

Outstanding

Amount

Surplus

Earnings

Stock

Income (Loss)

Directors

Total

December 31, 2019

—

67,824,428

$
141,827

$
1,636,966

$
824,694

$
(9,463
)

$
1,201

$
(1,304
)

$
2,593,921

Net income

—

—

—

—

69,189

—

—

—

69,189

Other comprehensive income

—

—

—

—

—

—

37,100

—

37,100

Comprehensive income

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

106,289

Common dividends declared ($0.96 per share)

—

—

—

—

(64,400
)

—

—

—

(64,400
)
Adoption of accounting standard

—

—

—

—

(26,591
)

—

—

—

(26,591
)
Issuance of preferred stock, net of issuance costs

144,529

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

144,529

Treasury shares acquired

—

(813,108
)

—

118

—

(25,414
)

—

—

(25,296
)
Stock options exercised

—

22,929

7

(224
)

—

721

—

—

504

Restricted stock granted

—

181,763

—

(6,753
)

—

6,753

—

—

—

Stock compensation expense

—

—

—

4,055

—

—

—

—

4,055

Deferred benefits for directors- net

—

—

—

10

—

—

—

(55
)

(45
)
September 30, 2020

144,529

67,216,012

$
141,834

$
1,634,172

$
802,892

$
(27,403
)

$
38,301

$
(1,359
)

$
2,732,966

December 31, 2018

—

54,598,134

$
113,758

$
1,166,701

$
737,581

$
(274
)

$
(37,871
)

$
(1,068
)

$
1,978,827

Net income

—

—

—

—

122,497

—

—

—

122,497

Other comprehensive income

—

—

—

—

—

—

47,793

—

47,793

Comprehensive income

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

170,290

Common dividends declared ($0.93 per share)

—

—

—

—

(50,746
)

—

—

—

(50,746
)
Treasury shares acquired

—

(26,358
)

—

170

—

(967
)

—

—

(797
)
Stock options exercised

—

6,000

8

12

—

101

—

—

121

Restricted stock granted

—

113,449

188

(1,076
)

—

888

—

—

—

Stock compensation expense

—

—

—

3,772

—

—

—

—

3,772

Deferred benefits for directors- net

—

—

—

16

—

—

—

(214
)

(198
)
September 30, 2019

—

54,691,225

$
113,954

$
1,169,595

$
809,332

$
(252
)

$
9,922

$
(1,282
)

$
2,101,269

	For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2021 and 2020
																	Accumulated
	Preferred		Common Stock														Other			Deferred
(unaudited, in thousands, except	Stock		Shares					Capital			Retained			Treasury			Comprehensive			Benefits for
shares and per share amounts)	Amount		Outstanding			Amount		Surplus			Earnings			Stock			Income (Loss)			Directors			Total
December 31, 2020	$	144,484		67,254,706		$	141,834	$	1,634,815		$	831,688		$	(25,949	)	$	31,359		$	(1,494	)	$	2,756,737
Net income		—		—			—		—			188,112			—			—			—			188,112
Other comprehensive loss		—		—			—		—			—			—			(26,896	)		—			(26,896	)
Comprehensive income		—		—			—		—			—			—			—			—			161,216
Common dividends declared ($0.99 per share)		—		—			—		—			(65,069	)		—			—			—			(65,069	)
Preferred dividends declared ($16.875 per share)		—		—			—		—			(7,594	)		—			—			—			(7,594	)
Stock issued for dividend reinvestment		—		11,720			—		—			(391	)		391			—			—			—
Treasury shares acquired		—		(3,649,091	)		—		191			—			(128,197	)		—			—			(128,006	)
Stock options exercised		—		92,393			—		(867	)		—			3,167			—			—			2,300
Restricted stock granted		—		128,821			—		(4,486	)		—			4,486			—			—			—
Stock compensation expense		—		—			—		4,415			—			—			—			—			4,415
Deferred benefits for directors- net		—		—			—		18			—			—			—			(34	)		(16	)
September 30, 2021	$	144,484		63,838,549		$	141,834	$	1,634,086		$	946,746		$	(146,102	)	$	4,463		$	(1,528	)	$	2,723,983

December 31, 2019	$	—		67,824,428		$	141,827	$	1,636,966		$	824,694		$	(9,463	)	$	1,201		$	(1,304	)	$	2,593,921
Net income		—	—			—		—				69,189		—			—			—				69,189
Other comprehensive income		—	—			—		—			—			—				37,100		—				37,100
Comprehensive income		—	—			—		—			—			—			—			—				106,289
Common dividends declared ($0.96 per share)		—	—			—		—				(64,400	)	—			—			—				(64,400	)
Adoption of ASU 2016-13		—		—		—			—			(26,591	)		—		—			—				(26,591	)
Issuance of preferred stock, net of issuance costs		144,529		—			—		—			—			—			—			—			144,529
Treasury shares acquired		—		(813,108	)	—			118		—				(25,414	)	—			—				(25,296	)
Stock options exercised		—		22,929			7		(224	)	—				721		—			—				504
Restricted stock granted		—		181,763			—		(6,753	)		—			6,753			—			—			—
Stock compensation expense		—		—		—			4,055		—			—			—			—				4,055
Deferred benefits for directors- net		—	—			—			10		—			—			—				(55	)		(45	)
September 30, 2020	$	144,529		67,216,012			141,834		1,634,172			802,892			(27,403	)		38,301			(1,359	)	$	2,732,966

	For the Nine Months Ended September 30,						For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
(unaudited, in thousands)	2020			2019			2021			2020
NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES	$	20,628		$	148,095		$	276,138		$	20,628
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Net increase in loans held for investment		(751,181	)		(84,688	)
Net decrease (increase) in loans held for investment								919,999			(751,181	)
Available-for-sale debt securities:
Proceeds from sales		226,099			125,239			—			226,099
Proceeds from maturities, prepayments and calls		586,711			287,515			636,120			586,711
Purchases of securities		(424,585	)		(384,890	)		(1,691,731	)		(424,585	)
Held-to-maturity debt securities:
Proceeds from maturities, prepayments and calls		148,840			112,182			77,806			148,840
Purchases of securities		(46,319	)		(15,005	)		(302,710	)		(46,319	)
Equity securities:
Proceeds from sales		203			3,567			—			203
Purchases of bank owned life insurance								(40,000	)		—
Proceeds from bank owned life insurance		832			—			2,375			832
Purchases of premises and equipment – net		(5,957	)		(8,342	)		(5,856	)		(5,957	)
Sale of portfolio loans		37,195			—			—			37,195
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities		(228,162	)		35,578
Net cash used in investing activities								(403,997	)		(228,162	)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Increase (decrease) in deposits		1,205,904			(165,800	)
Increase in deposits								997,027			1,205,904
Proceeds from Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings		475,000			470,000			—			475,000
Repayment of Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings		(1,096,157	)		(363,313	)		(340,153	)		(1,096,157	)
Increase in other short-term borrowings		107,047			5,725
(Decrease) increase in other short-term borrowings								(89,404	)		107,047
Principal repayments of finance lease obligations		(314	)		(300	)		(331	)		(314	)
(Decrease) increase in federal funds purchased		(7,500	)		29,000
Repayment of junior subordinated debt		(6,702	)		(33,506	)
Decrease in federal funds purchased								—			(7,500	)
Repayment of subordinated and junior subordinated debt								(25,000	)		(6,702	)
Dividends paid to common shareholders		(63,850	)		(49,656	)		(65,311	)		(63,850	)
Dividends paid to preferred shareholders								(7,594	)	—
Issuance of preferred stock, net of issuance costs		144,529			—			—			144,529
Issuance of common stock		59			71			—			59
Treasury shares purchased - net		(25,012	)		(747	)		(125,706	)		(25,012	)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		733,004			(108,526	)
Net cash provided by financing activities								343,528			733,004
Net increase in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash		525,470			75,147			215,669			525,470
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of the period		234,796			169,186			905,447			234,796
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of the period	$	760,266		$	244,333		$	1,121,116		$	760,266
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES
Interest paid on deposits and other borrowings	$	62,149		$	63,300		$	26,547		$	62,149
Income taxes paid		30,375			27,015			34,595			30,375
Transfers of loans to other real estate owned		263			684			526			263
Transfers of portfolio loans to loans held for sale		37,195			—			—			37,195
Transfers of held-to-maturity debt securities to available-for-sale debt securities		—			67,393
Right of use assets obtained in exchange for lease obligations		—			19,827

Basis of presentation — The accompanying unaudited interim financial statements of Wesbanco, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries (“Wesbanco”) have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements and should be read in conjunction with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2019.~~2020.

Wesbanco’s interim financial statements have been prepared following the significant accounting policies disclosed in Note 1 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of its ~~2019~~2020 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. In the opinion of management, the accompanying interim financial information reflects all adjustments, including normal recurring adjustments, necessary to present fairly Wesbanco’s financial position and results of operations for each of the interim periods presented. Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. Such reclassifications had no impact on Wesbanco’s net income and stockholders’ equity. Results of operations for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations that may be expected for a full year.

~~Loans and Loans Held for Sale —~~ Loans originated by Wesbanco are reported at the principal amount outstanding, net of unearned income including credit valuation adjustments, unamortized deferred loan fee income and loan origination costs. Interest is accrued as earned on loans except where doubt exists as to collectability, in which case accrual of income is discontinued. Loans originated and intended for sale are carried, in aggregate, at their estimated market value, as Wesbanco elected the fair value option on October 1, 2017.

Loan origination fees and direct costs are deferred and accreted or amortized into interest income, as an adjustment to the yield, over the life of the loan using the level yield method, or an approximation thereof. When a loan is paid off, the remaining unaccreted or unamortized net origination fees or costs are immediately recognized into income.

Loans are generally placed on non-accrual when they are 90 days past due, unless the loan is well-secured and in the process of collection. Loans may be returned to accrual status when a borrower has resumed paying principal and interest for a sustained period of at least six months and Wesbanco is reasonably assured of collecting the remaining contractual principal and interest. Loans are returned to accrual status at an amount equal to the principal balance of the loan at the time of non-accrual status less any payments applied to principal during the non-accrual period. Loans are reported as a troubled debt restructuring when Wesbanco, for economic or legal reasons related to a borrower’s financial difficulties, grants a concession to the borrower that it would not otherwise consider. Refer to the “Troubled Debt Restructurings” policy below for additional detail.

A loan is considered non-performing, based on current information and events, if it is probable that Wesbanco will be unable to collect the payments of principal and interest when due according to the original contractual terms of the loan agreement. Non-performing loans include all non-accrual loans and troubled debt restructurings. Wesbanco recognizes interest income on non-accrual loans on the cash basis only if recovery of principal is reasonably assured.

Consumer loans are charged down to the net realizable value at 120 days past due for closed-end loans and 180 days past due for open-end revolving lines of credit. Residential real estate loans are charged down to the net realizable value of the collateral at 180 days past due. Commercial loans are charged down to the net realizable value when it is determined that Wesbanco will be unable to collect the principal amount in full. Loans are reclassified to other assets at the net realizable value when foreclosure or repossession of the collateral occurs. Refer to the “Other Real Estate Owned and Repossessed Assets” policy below for additional detail.

On March 27, 2020, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act ("CARES Act") was signed into law, which, in part, established a loan program administered through the U.S. Small Business Administration ("SBA"), referred to as the Paycheck Protection Program ("PPP"). Under the PPP, small businesses, sole proprietorships, independent contractors, non-profit organizations and self-employed individuals could apply for loans from existing SBA lenders and other approved regulated lenders that enrolled in the program, subject to numerous limitations and eligibility criteria. Wesbanco has participated as a lender in the PPP program. All loans have a 1% interest rate and Wesbanco earns a fee that is based upon a tiered schedule corresponding with the amount of the loan to the borrower, which is deferred and recognized over the life of the loan. Based upon the borrower meeting certain criteria as defined by the CARES act, the loan may be forgiven by the SBA. Wesbanco reports these loans at their principal amount outstanding, net of unearned income, unamortized deferred loan fee income and loan origination costs. Interest is accrued as earned and loan origination fees and direct costs are deferred and accreted or amortized into interest income, as an adjustment to the yield, over the life of the loan using the level yield method, or an approximation thereof. When a PPP loan is paid off or forgiven by the SBA, the remaining unaccreted or unamortized net origination fees or costs are immediately recognized into income

~~Troubled Debt Restructurings (“TDR”) —~~ A restructuring of a loan constitutes a TDR if the creditor, for economic or legal reasons related to the debtor's financial difficulties, grants a concession to the debtor that it would not otherwise consider. The determination of whether a concession has been granted includes an evaluation of the debtor’s ability to access funds at a market rate for debt with similar risk characteristics and among other things, the significance of the modification relative to unpaid principal or collateral value of the debt, and/or the significance of a delay in the timing of payments relative to the frequency of payments, original maturity date, or the expected duration of the loan. The most common concessions granted generally include one or more modifications to the terms of the debt such as a reduction in the interest rate below the prevailing market rate for the remaining life of the debt, an extension of the maturity date at an interest rate lower than the prevailing market rate for new debt with similar risk, or reduction of the unpaid principal or interest. Additionally, all consumer bankruptcies are considered TDR; all TDRs are considered nonperforming loans.

When determining whether a debtor is experiencing financial difficulties, consideration is given to any known default on any of its debt or whether it is probable that the debtor would be in payment default in the foreseeable future without the modification. Other indicators of financial

difficulty include whether the debtor has declared or is in the process of declaring bankruptcy, the debtor’s ability to continue as a going concern, or the debtor’s projected cash flow to service its debt (including principal & interest) in accordance with the contractual terms for the foreseeable future, without a modification. If the payment of principal at original maturity is primarily dependent on the value of collateral, the current value of that collateral is considered in determining whether the principal will be paid.

The restructuring of a loan does not increase the allowance or provision for credit losses unless the loan is extended or the loans are commercial loans that are individually evaluated for impairment, in which case a specific reserve is established pursuant to GAAP. Portfolio segment loss history is the primary factor for establishing the allowance for residential real estate, home equity and consumer TDRs.

Non-accrual loans that are restructured remain on non-accrual, but may move to accrual status after they have performed according to the restructured terms for a period of time. TDRs on accrual status generally remain on accrual as long as they continue to perform in accordance with their modified terms. TDRs may also be placed on non-accrual if they do not perform in accordance with the restructured terms. Loans may be removed from TDR status after they have performed according to the renegotiated terms for a period of time if the interest rate under the modified terms is at or above market, or if the loan returns to its original terms.

Section 4013 of the CARES Act, “Temporary Relief From Troubled Debt Restructurings,” allows financial institutions the option to temporarily suspend certain requirements under U.S. GAAP related to TDRs for a limited period of time during the COVID-19 pandemic. On April 7, 2020, the joint federal regulatory agencies issued a statement, “Interagency Statement on Loan Modifications and Reporting for Financial Institutions Working With Customers Affected by the Coronavirus (Revised)” (“Interagency Statement”), which further discusses loan modifications related to COVID-19. Wesbanco has extended up to a 180 day delay in loan principal and/or interest payments for customers affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. These customers must meet certain criteria, such as they were in good standing and not more than 30 days past due either as of December 31, 2019, or as of the implementation of the modification program under the Interagency Statement, as well as other requirements noted in the regulatory agencies’ revised statement. Based on the CARES Act provisions and the guidance noted above, Wesbanco does not classify the COVID-19 loan modifications as TDRs, nor are the customers considered past due with regards to their delayed payments to the extent they meet the criteria. Upon exiting the loan modification deferral program, the measurement of loan delinquency will resume where it left off upon entry into the program.

On August 3, 2020, the joint federal regulatory agencies issued a statement, “Joint Statement on Additional Loan Accommodations Related to COVID-19”. This statement provides financial institutions with considerations for certain customers nearing the end of their COVID-19 loan deferral period noted above. As per this guidance and in accordance with the CARES Act noted above, Wesbanco is currently developing a plan to assist certain customers with additional deferrals of principal and/or interest, but also requiring detailed financial information from the customer to determine the financial need, the period of relief to be considered and the type of deferral warranted.

~~Acquired Loans~~ - Loans acquired in connection with acquisitions are recorded at their acquisition-date fair value with no carryover of related allowance for credit losses. Acquired loans are classified into two categories; purchased financial instruments with more than insignificant credit deterioration (“PCD”) loans, and loans with insignificant credit deterioration (“non-PCD”). PCD loans are defined as a loan or group of loans that have experienced more than insignificant credit deterioration since origination. Non-PCD loans will have an allowance established on acquisition date, which is recognized in the current period provision for credit losses. For PCD loans, an allowance is recognized on day 1 by adding it to the fair value of the loan, which is the “Day 1 amortized cost”. There is no credit loss expense recognized on PCD loans because the initial allowance is established by grossing-up the amortized cost of the PCD loan. Determining the fair value of the acquired loans involves estimating the principal and interest cash flows expected to be collected on the loans and discounting those cash flows at a market rate of interest. Management considers a number of factors in evaluating the acquisition-date fair value including the remaining life of the acquired loans, delinquency status, estimated prepayments, payment options and other loan features, internal risk grade, estimated value of the underlying collateral and interest rate environment.

~~PCD loans are accounted for in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 326-20,~~ ~~Financial Instruments – Credit Losses – Measure at Amortized Cost~~, if, at acquisition, the loan or pool of loans has experienced more-than-insignificant credit deterioration since origination. At acquisition, Wesbanco considers several factors as indicators that an acquired loan or pool of loans has experienced more-than-insignificant credit deterioration. These factors include loans 30 days or more past due, loans with an internal risk grade of below average or lower, loans classified as non-accrual by the acquired institution, the materiality of the credit and loans that have been previously modified in a troubled debt restructuring.

Under ASC 326-20, a group of loans with similar risk characteristics can be assessed to determine if the pool of loans is PCD. However, if a loan does not have similar risk characteristics as any other acquired loan, the loan is individually assessed to determine if it is PCD. In addition, the initial allowance related to acquired loans can be estimated for a pool of loans if the loans have similar risk characteristics. Even if the loans were individually assessed to determine if they were PCD, they can be grouped together in the initial allowance calculation if they share similar risk characteristics. Since Wesbanco uses the discounted cash flow (DCF) approach, the initial allowance calculation for PCD loans is calculated as the expected contractual cash shortfalls, discounted at the rate that equals the net present value of estimated future cash flows expected to be collected with the purchase price of the loan(s). If a PCD loan has an unfunded commitment at acquisition, the initial allowance for credit losses calculation reflects only the expected credit losses associated with the funded portion of the PCD loan. Expected credit losses associated with the unfunded commitment are included in the initial measurement of the commitment.

For PCD loans, the non-credit discount or premium is allocated to individual loans as determined by the difference between the loan’s amortized cost basis and the unpaid principal balance. The non-credit premium or discount is recognized into interest income on a level yield basis over the remaining expected life of the loan. For non-PCD loans, the interest and credit discount or premium is allocated to individual loans as determined by the difference between the loan’s amortized cost basis and the unpaid principal balance. The premium or discount is recognized into interest income on a level yield basis over the remaining expected life of the loan.

~~Allowance for Credit Losses —~~ The allowance for credit losses reduces the loan portfolio to the net amount expected to be collected and establishes an allowance for unfunded loan commitments. The allowance for credit losses represents the lifetime expected losses for all loans and unfunded loan commitments at the initial recognition date. The allowance incorporates forward-looking information and applies a reversion methodology beyond the reasonable and supportable forecast. The allowance is increased by a provision charged to operating expense and reduced

by charge-offs, net of recoveries. Management evaluates the appropriateness of the allowance at least quarterly. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires material estimates that may be susceptible to significant change from period to period.

The allowance for credit loss calculation is based on the loan’s amortized cost basis, which is comprised of the unpaid principal balance of the loan, deferred loan fees (costs) and acquired premium (discount) minus any write-downs. Wesbanco made an accounting policy election to exclude accrued interest from the measurement of the allowance for credit losses because the Company has a robust policy in place to reverse or write-off accrued interest when a loan is placed on non-accrual, and also Wesbanco made an accounting policy election to reverse accrued interest deemed uncollectible as a reversal of interest income. However, Wesbanco is reserving, as part of the allowance for credit losses, for accrued interest on loan modifications under the CARES Act due to the nature and timing of these deferrals.

The allowance for credit losses reflects the risk of loss on the loan portfolio. To appropriately measure expected credit losses, management disaggregates the loan portfolio into pools of similar risk characteristics. The Company utilizes the probability of default (“PD”) / loss given default (“LGD”) approach to calculate the expected loss for each segment, which is then discounted to net present value. PD is the probability the asset will default within a given timeframe and LGD is the percentage of the assets not expected to be collected due to default. The primary macroeconomic drivers of the quantitative model include forecasts of national unemployment and interest rate spreads. Management relies on macroeconomic forecasts obtained from various reputable sources, which may include the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) forecast and other publicly available forecasts from well recognized, leading economists. These forecasts can range from one to two years, depending upon the facts and circumstances of the current state of the economy, portfolio segment and management’s judgement of what can be reasonably supported. The model reversion period ranges from one to three years.

The allowance for credit losses is calculated over the loan’s contractual life. For term loans, the contractual life is calculated based on the maturity date. For commercial and industrial (“C&I”) revolving loans with no stated maturity date, the contractual life is calculated based on the internal review date. For all other revolving loans, the contractual life is based on either the estimated maturity date or a default date. The contractual term does not include expected extensions, renewals or modifications unless management has a reasonable expectation as of the reporting period that Wesbanco will execute a TDR with the borrower. Management assumes a loan will become a TDR if a consumer loan has matured, has a principal balance, and has previously been partially charged-off. This assumption extends the maturity of these loans to the six months beyond maturity date.

The loan portfolio is segmented based on the risk profiles of the loans. Commercial loans are segmented between commercial real estate (“CRE”), which are collateralized by real estate, and C&I, which are typically utilized for general business purposes. CRE is further segmented between land and construction (“LCD”) and improved property, which are generally loans to purchase or refinance owner occupied or non-owner occupied investment properties. LCD loans have a unique risk that the developer or builder may not complete the project or not complete it on time or within budget. Improved property loans are reviewed for risk based on the underlying real estate property such as rental or owner income, appraisal value and other current lease terms, which affect debt service coverage and loan to value. Retail loans are a homogenous group, generally consisting of standardized products that are smaller in amount and distributed over a large number of individual borrowers. The group is segmented into 3 categories – residential real estate, HELOC and consumer.

Contractual terms are adjusted for estimated prepayments to arrive at expected cash flows. Wesbanco models term loans with an annualized “prepayment” rate. When Wesbanco has a specific expectation of differing payment behavior for a given loan, the loan may be evaluated individually. For revolving loans that do not have a principal payment schedule, a curtailment rate is factored into the cash flow.

The evaluation also considers qualitative factors such as economic trends and conditions, which includes levels of regional unemployment, real estate values and the impact on specific industries and geographical markets, changes in lending policies and underwriting standards, delinquency and other credit quality trends, concentrations of credit risk, if any, the results of internal loan reviews and examinations by bank regulatory agencies pertaining to the allowance for credit losses. Management relies on observable data from internal and external sources to the extent it is available to evaluate each of these factors and adjusts the model’s quantitative results to reflect the impact these factors may have on probable losses in the portfolio. As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, there is concern within the banking industry that deferrals are delaying the overall impact of COVID-19 on the loan portfolio. As such, a temporary COVID-19 qualitative factor has been incorporated to recognize increased risk within the portfolio that is not captured by the quantitative output.

Commercial loans, including CRE and C&I, greater than $1 million in balance that are reported as non-accrual, troubled debt restructuring or that have other unique characteristics are tested individually for estimated credit losses. Specific reserves are established when appropriate for such loans based on the net present value of expected future cash flows of the loan or the estimated realizable value of the collateral, if any.

Management may also adjust its assumptions to account for differences between expected and actual losses from period to period. The variability of management’s assumptions could alter the level of the allowance for credit losses and may have a material impact on future results of operations and financial condition. The loss estimation models and methods used to determine the allowance for credit losses are continually refined and enhanced.

Recent accounting ~~pronouncements –~~ pronouncements—The Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards ~~Update~~Updates (“ASU”) as noted below.

In March 2020, the FASB issued ASU 2020-04, “Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848)”. ~~Due~~This ASU provided temporary, optional guidance to ease the potential ~~discontinuance~~burden in accounting for, or recognizing the effects of, the ~~London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR), regulators have undertaken~~transition away from LIBOR or other reference rate ~~initiatives~~expected to ~~identify alternative reference rates that are more observable or transaction based and less susceptible to manipulation.~~be discontinued on financial reporting. The ASU also provides optional expedients for contract modifications that replace a reference rate affected by reference rate reform. The guidance is effective as of March 12, 2020 through December 31, ~~2022.~~2022, and can be adopted at any time during this period. In January 2021, the FASB issued ASU 2021-01, “Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848): Scope”. This ASU refines the scope of Topic 848 and addresses questions about whether Topic 848 can be applied to derivative instruments that do not reference a rate that is expected to be discontinued, but that use an interest rate for margining, discounting or contract price alignment that is expected to be modified as a result of reference rate reform. ASU 2021-01 is effective upon issuance through December 31, 2022, and can be adopted at any time during this period. Wesbanco ~~is assessing~~has not yet adopted either ASU, but has implemented a transition plan to identify and modify its loans and other financial instruments with attributes that are either directly or indirectly influenced by LIBOR, and continues to assess the impact of adopting the new guidance on the consolidated financial statements on an ongoing basis, with no material impacts expected at this time.

ASU ~~2018-15 Intangibles – Goodwill and Other Internal-Use Software~~2019-12 Income Taxes (Topic 740)

In ~~August 2018,~~December 2019, the FASB issued ASU ~~2018-15, “Intangibles - Goodwill and Other Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40)~~2019-12, “Income Taxes (Topic 740): ~~Customer’s~~Simplifying the Accounting for ~~Implementation Costs Incurred~~Income Taxes,” which removes specific exceptions to the general principles in Topic 740 in GAAP. It eliminates the need for an organization to analyze whether the following apply in a ~~Cloud Computing Arrangement~~given period: (1) exception to the incremental approach for intraperiod tax allocation; (2) exceptions to accounting for basis differences when there are ownership changes in foreign investments; and (3) exception in interim period income tax accounting for year-to-date losses that isexceed anticipated losses. The ASU also improves financial statement preparers’ application of income tax-related guidance and simplifies GAAP for: (1) franchise taxes that are partially based on income; (2) transactions with a ~~Service Contract.” This ASU specifically aligns the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred~~government that result in a ~~hosting arrangement~~step-up in the tax basis of goodwill; (3) separate financial statements of legal entities that ~~is a service contract with the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred~~are not subject to ~~develop or obtain internal-use software~~tax; and hosting arrangements that include an internal-use software license. The ASU does not affect the accounting for the service element of a hosting arrangement that is a service contract. The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019 and(4) enacted changes in tax laws in interim ~~periods within those fiscal years.~~periods. For Wesbanco, this update was effective beginning January 1, ~~2020.~~2021. The adoption of this pronouncement did not have a material impact on ~~Wesbanco’s Consolidated Financial Statements.~~

~~ASU 2018-14 Compensation—Retirement Benefits—Defined Benefit Plans—General (Topic 715-20)~~

~~In August 2018,~~ the FASB issued ASU 2018-14, “Compensation—Retirement Benefits—Defined Benefit Plans—General (Topic 715-20): Disclosure Framework—Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Defined Benefit Plans.” This ASU modifies Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 715-20 to improve disclosure requirements for employers that sponsor defined benefit pension or other postretirement plans. The guidance is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2020. Early adoption is permitted. Wesbanco is currently assessing the impact of ASU 2018-14 on Wesbanco’s Consolidated Financial Statements.financial statements.

~~ASU 2018-13 Fair Value Measurement – Disclosure Framework – Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement~~

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-13, “Fair Value Measurement – Disclosure Framework – Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement.” This ASU modifies the disclosure objective paragraphs of ASC 820 to eliminate (1) “at a minimum” from the phrase “an entity shall disclose at a minimum” and (2) other similar “open ended” disclosure requirements to promote the appropriate exercise of discretion of entities. The guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2019. For Wesbanco, this update was effective January 1, 2020. The adoption of this pronouncement did not have a material impact on Wesbanco’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

In September 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, “Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326),” which require entities to use a new forward-looking “expected loss” model also referred to as the current expected credit loss model (“CECL”) on trade and other receivables, held-to-maturity debt securities, loans and other instruments that generally will result in the earlier recognition of allowances for credit losses. For available-for-sale debt securities with unrealized losses, entities measure credit losses in a manner similarly to current procedures, except that the losses will be recognized as allowances rather than reductions in the amortized cost of the securities. Entities will have to disclose significantly more information, including information they use to track credit quality by year of origination for most financing receivables. In April 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-04, “Codification Improvements to Topic 326, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses, Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging and Topic 825, Financial Instruments” and in May 2019 the FASB issued ASU 2019-05, “Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326), Targeted Transition Relief. Public business entities must apply the new requirements for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years, which for Wesbanco was effective January 1, 2020. In December 2018, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) and the Office of Comptroller of the Currency (“OCC”) approved a final rule to address changes to credit loss accounting under GAAP, including banking organizations’ adoption of the CECL methodology. The final rule provides banking organizations the option to phase-in, over a three-year period, the day-one adverse effects on regulatory capital that may result from the adoption of the new accounting standard. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the joint federal bank regulatory agencies issued an optional extension of the regulatory capital transition, which allows for a ~~two-year~~ ~~delay and then a~~ ~~three-year~~ transition period from January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2024. Under the interim final rule, the amount of adjustments to regulatory capital deferred until the phase-in period includes both the initial impact of our adoption of CECL at January 1, 2020 and 25% of subsequent changes in our allowance for credit losses during each quarter of the ~~two-year~~ period ended December 31, 2021, (collectively, the “CECL regulatory capital transition adjustment”). Wesbanco has elected to defer the impact of CECL on its regulatory capital for two years and then will phase-in the impact of the adoption of this standard on the regulatory capital calculations over the subsequent ~~three-year~~ ~~period.~~

Under CECL, acquired loans or pools of loans that have experienced more-than-insignificant credit deterioration are deemed to be PCD loans, and are grossed-up on day 1 by the initial credit estimate through the allowance as opposed to a reduction in the loan’s amortized cost. The credit mark on acquired loans deemed not to be PCD loans are reflected as a reduction in the loan’s amortized cost, with an allowance and corresponding provision for credit losses recorded in the first reporting period after acquisition through current period earnings, while the loan mark will accrete through interest income over the life of such loans. At acquisition, Wesbanco will consider several factors as indicators that an acquired loan or pool of loans has experienced more-than-insignificant credit deterioration. These factors may include loans 30 days or more past due, loans with an internal risk grade of below average or lower, loans classified as non-accrual by the acquired institution, materiality of the credit and loans that have been previously modified in a TDR. Upon adoption of this standard, acquired loans from prior acquisitions that meet the guidelines under ASC 310-30 (formerly known as “purchased credit-impaired”) were reclassified as PCD loans. The accretable portion of the loan mark as of adoption date continues to accrete into interest income. However, the non-accretable portion of the loan mark was added to the allowance upon adoption, and any reversals of such mark will flow through the allowance in future periods. The loan mark on ASC 310-20 loans (“non-purchased credit-impaired”) from prior acquisitions continues to accrete through interest income over the life of such loans.

allowance. Wesbanco engaged a third-party to validate the data inputs and the models utilized in the CECL calculation. In addition, the Company prepared documentation of the accounting policy decisions, changes to the business processes and procedures, and the control environment under the adoption of this standard. The day 1 impact on the allowance for credit losses was $41.4 million, which included a $6.7 million adjustment for PCD loans and a $3.0 million adjustment related to loan commitments. The after-tax effect on retained earnings was $26.6 million as of January 1, 2020. The day 1 CECL calculation was derived from the selected assumption of a one-year reasonable and supportable forecast, which was obtained from a third-party vendor. After the forecast period, Wesbanco reverts back over a one year period to historical loss rates adjusting for prepayments and curtailments, to estimate losses over the remaining life of loans. The most sensitive assumptions include the length of the forecast and reversion periods, forecast of unemployment and interest rate spreads and prepayment speeds. See Note 5, “Loans and Allowance for Credit Losses” for further detail.

Wesbanco recognized an allowance for credit losses for held-to-maturity (“HTM”) debt securities of $0.2 million as of January 1, 2020 upon adoption of this standard. See Note 4, “Investments” for further detail.

On November 22, 2019, Wesbanco completed its acquisition of OLBK, a bank holding company headquartered in Bowie, MD. On the acquisition date, OLBK had approximately $3.0 billion in assets, excluding goodwill, which included approximately $2.5 billion in loans and $182.2 million in securities. The OLBK acquisition was valued at $494.0 million, based on Wesbanco’s closing stock price on November 22, 2019, of $36.75, and resulted in Wesbanco issuing 13,351,837 shares of its common stock in exchange for all of the outstanding shares of OLBK common stock, including stock options, of which the fair value was $3.3 million. The assets and liabilities of OLBK were recorded on Wesbanco’s Balance Sheet at their preliminary estimated fair values as of November 22, 2019, the acquisition date, and OLBK’s results of operations have been included in Wesbanco’s Consolidated Statements of Income since that date. Based on a preliminary purchase price allocation, Wesbanco recorded $231.0 million in goodwill and $32.9 million in core deposit intangibles in its Community Banking segment. None of the goodwill is deductible for income tax purposes, as the acquisition is accounted for as a tax-free exchange for tax purposes. As a result of the integration of the operations of OLBK, it is not practicable to determine revenue or net income included in Wesbanco’s operating results relating to OLBK since the date of acquisition, as OLBK’s results cannot be separately identified.

~~For the nine months ended September 30, 2020, Wesbanco recorded merger-related expenses of $6.3 million associated with the OLBK acquisition.~~

~~The preliminary purchase price of the OLBK acquisition and resulting goodwill is summarized as follows:~~

The following table presents the preliminary allocation of the purchase price of the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition, as Wesbanco intends to finalize its accounting for the acquisition of OLBK within one year of the date of acquisition:

The following table presents the changes in the allocation of the purchase price of the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed at the date of the acquisition from that previously reported at June 30, 2020:

The fair value estimates for deferred taxes and other assets/liabilities will continue to fluctuate until the final tax returns are completed. The Company expects to finalize the purchase price accounting for OLBK within one year of the date of acquisition.

	For the Three Months Ended September 30,				For the Nine Months Ended September 30,				For the Three Months Ended September 30,				For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
(unaudited, in thousands, except shares and per share amounts)	2020		2019		2020		2019		2021		2020		2021		2020
Numerator for both basic and diluted earnings per common share:
Net income	$	41,305	$	37,347	$	69,189	$	122,497
Net income available to common shareholders									$	41,877	$	41,305	$	180,518	$	69,189
Denominator:
Total average basic common shares outstanding		67,214,759		54,695,578		67,268,449		54,641,057		64,931,764		67,214,759		66,354,750		67,268,449
Effect of dilutive stock options and other stock compensation		54,544		55,766		83,408		64,704		134,084		54,544		155,607		83,408
Total diluted average common shares outstanding		67,269,303		54,751,344		67,351,857		54,705,761		65,065,848		67,269,303		66,510,357		67,351,857
Earnings per common share - basic	$	0.61	$	0.68	$	1.03	$	2.24	$	0.64	$	0.61	$	2.72	$	1.03
Earnings per common share - diluted	$	0.61	$	0.68	$	1.03	$	2.24	$	0.64	$	0.61	$	2.71	$	1.03

As of September 30, ~~2020~~2021 and ~~September 30, 2019~~2020, respectively, ~~729,985 shares~~534,961 and ~~352,250~~729,985 options to purchase shares were not included in the computation of net income per diluted share for the three months ended September 30, ~~2020~~2021 and ~~2019,~~2020 because the exercise price was greater than the average market price of a common share, therefore, the effect would be antidilutive.

As of September 30, ~~2020~~2021 and ~~September 30, 2019~~2020, respectively, ~~536,761 shares~~534,961 and ~~352,250~~536,761 options to purchase shares were not included in the computation of net income per diluted share for the nine months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020 ~~and 2019, because~~on the ~~exercise price was greater than the average market price of a common share, therefore, the effect would be antidilutive.~~same basis.

As of September 30, ~~2020 and 2019,~~2021, 0 shares related to the 2021, 2020 and 2019 total shareholder return plans were ~~not~~ included in the calculation because the effect would be antidilutive. On the same basis, as of September 30, 2020, 0 shares related to the 2020, 2019 and 2018 total shareholder return plans were included in the calculation.

~~Performance-based~~In addition, performance-based restricted stock ~~compensation~~ totaling ~~27,371~~61,267 and ~~30,137~~27,371 shares were estimated to be awarded as of September 30, ~~2020~~2021 and ~~2019,~~September 30, 2020, respectively, and are included in the diluted ~~calculation.~~

~~On November 22, 2019, Wesbanco issued 13,351,837 shares of common stock to complete its acquisition of OLBK~~calculation for both the three and granted 34,998 shares of restricted stock to certain OLBK employees. These shares are included in average shares outstanding beginning on that date. For additional information relating to the OLBK acquisition, refer to Note 2, “Mergers and Acquisitions.” nine months ended.

The following table presents the fair value and amortized cost of available-for-sale and held-to-maturity debt securities:

	September 30, 2020									December 31, 2019									September 30, 2021									December 31, 2020
(unaudited, in thousands)	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Estimated Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Estimated Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Estimated Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Estimated Fair Value
Available-for-sale debt securities
U.S. Treasury	$	19,985	$	7	$	—		$	19,992	$	32,790	$	47	$	(1	)	$	32,836	$	10,000	$	—	$	—		$	10,000	$	39,975	$	7	$	—		$	39,982
U.S. Government sponsored entities and agencies		184,877		7,978		(6	)		192,849		157,088		2,862		(322	)		159,628		230,241		5,146		(1,952	)		233,435		204,109		7,715		(142	)		211,682
Residential mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations of government sponsored entities and agencies		1,378,963		42,892		(832	)		1,421,023		1,803,268		18,850		(6,131	)		1,815,987		2,285,014		24,071		(14,629	)		2,294,456		1,230,106		35,979		(1,348	)		1,264,737
Commercial mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations of government sponsored entities and agencies		246,985		12,684		(59	)		259,610		187,268		3,270		(129	)		190,409		316,004		6,223		(678	)		321,549		308,903		11,464		(269	)		320,098
Obligations of states and political subdivisions		119,235		7,304		—			126,539		140,357		5,253		(1	)		145,609		104,179		5,693		(51	)		109,821		108,602		7,160		—			115,762
Corporate debt securities		24,976		956		(21	)		25,911		48,645		581		(137	)		49,089		16,937		606		(1	)		17,542		24,963		912		—			25,875
Total available-for-sale debt securities	$	1,975,021	$	71,821	$	(918	)	$	2,045,924	$	2,369,416	$	30,863	$	(6,721	)	$	2,393,558	$	2,962,375	$	41,739	$	(17,311	)	$	2,986,803	$	1,916,658	$	63,237	$	(1,759	)	$	1,978,136
Held-to-maturity debt securities
U.S. Government sponsored entities and agencies	$	8,256	$	317	$	—		$	8,573	$	9,216	$	30	$	(116	)	$	9,130	$	6,639	$	168	$	—		$	6,807	$	7,779	$	265	$	—		$	8,044
Residential mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations of government sponsored entities and agencies		99,703		3,797		(1	)		103,499		122,937		1,031		(261	)		123,707		63,682		2,156		(3	)		65,835		89,151		3,251		—			92,402
Obligations of states and political subdivisions		605,636		28,379		(122	)		633,893		686,376		20,475		(258	)		706,593		850,498		24,087		(4,181	)		870,404		601,128		30,173		(59	)		631,242
Corporate debt securities		33,172		3,264		—			36,436		33,224		1,869		—			35,093		33,101		2,347		—			35,448		33,154		3,341		—			36,495
Total held-to-maturity debt securities(1)	$	746,767	$	35,757	$	(123	)	$	782,401	$	851,753	$	23,405	$	(635	)	$	874,523	$	953,920	$	28,758	$	(4,184	)	$	978,494	$	731,212	$	37,030	$	(59	)	$	768,183
Total debt securities	$	2,721,788	$	107,578	$	(1,041	)	$	2,828,325	$	3,221,169	$	54,268	$	(7,356	)	$	3,268,081	$	3,916,295	$	70,497	$	(21,495	)	$	3,965,297	$	2,647,870	$	100,267	$	(1,818	)	$	2,746,319

At September 30, ~~2020~~2021 and December 31, ~~2019,~~2020, there were 0 holdings of any one issuer, other than U.S. government sponsored entities and its agencies, in an amount greater than 10% of Wesbanco’s shareholders’ equity. Equity securities, of which ~~$9.5~~$10.5 million consist of investments in various mutual funds held in grantor trusts formed in connection with the Company’s deferred compensation plan, are recorded at fair value, and totaled ~~$12.5~~$13.5 million and ~~$12.3~~$13.0 million at September 30, ~~2020~~2021 and December 31, ~~2019,~~2020, respectively.

The following table presents the amortized cost and fair value of available-for-sale and held-to-maturity debt securities by contractual maturity date at September 30, ~~2020.~~2021. Actual maturities will differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay debt obligations with or without prepayment penalties. Mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations are classified in the table below based on their contractual maturity date; however, regular principal payments and prepayments of principal are received on a monthly basis.

(unaudited, in thousands)	Amortized Cost		Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Fair Value
Available-for-sale debt securities
Less than one year	$	44,340	$	44,461	$	19,676	$	19,738
1-5 years		152,865		161,571		160,437		167,561
5-10 years		328,452		342,555		388,742		394,795
Over 10 years		1,449,364		1,497,337		2,393,520		2,404,709
Total available-for-sale debt securities	$	1,975,021	$	2,045,924	$	2,962,375	$	2,986,803
Held-to-maturity debt securities
Less than one year	$	11,901	$	12,005	$	16,539	$	16,735
1-5 years		119,398		126,351		128,436		134,632
5-10 years		263,457		275,405		232,619		242,600
Over 10 years		352,011		368,640		576,326		584,527
Total held-to-maturity debt securities	$	746,767	$	782,401	$	953,920	$	978,494
Total debt securities	$	2,721,788	$	2,828,325	$	3,916,295	$	3,965,297

Securities with an aggregate fair value of ~~$1.9~~$2.0 billion and ~~$2.0~~$1.8 billion at September 30, ~~2020~~2021 and December 31, ~~2019,~~2020, respectively, were pledged as security for public and trust funds, and securities sold under agreements to repurchase. Proceeds from the sale of available-for-sale securities were ~~$226.1 million~~$0 and ~~$125.2~~$226.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2020~~2021 and ~~2019,~~2020, respectively. Net unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities included in accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax, as of September 30, ~~2020~~2021 and December 31, ~~2019~~2020 were ~~$54.0~~$18.5 million and ~~$20.7~~$46.9 million, respectively.

The following table presents the gross realized gains and losses on sales and calls of available-for-sale and held-to-maturity debt securities, as well as gains and losses on equity securities from both sales and market adjustments, for the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2020~~2021 and ~~2019,~~2020, respectively. All gains and losses presented in the table below are included in the net securities gains ~~(losses)~~ line item of the income statement. For those equity securities relating to the key officer and director deferred compensation plan, the corresponding change in the obligation to the participant is recognized in employee benefits expense.

	For the Three Months Ended September 30,						For the Nine Months Ended September 30,						For the Three Months Ended September 30,						For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
(unaudited, in thousands)	2020			2019			2020			2019			2021			2020			2021			2020
Debt securities:
Gross realized gains	$	100		$	1,096		$	3,715		$	1,443		$	22		$	100		$	222		$	3,715
Gross realized losses		(2	)		(741	)		(1,068	)		(950	)		(2	)		(2	)		(41	)		(1,068	)
Net gains on debt securities	$	98		$	355		$	2,647		$	493		$	20		$	98		$	181		$	2,647
Equity securities:
Net unrealized gains recognized on securities still held	$	687		$	(120	)	$	936		$	748
Net unrealized (losses) gains recognized on securities still held													$	(35	)	$	687		$	559		$	936
Net realized gains (losses) recognized on securities sold		2			—			(6	)		2,559			—			2			—			(6	)
Net gains on equity securities	$	689		$	(120	)	$	930		$	3,307
Net securities gains	$	787		$	235		$	3,577		$	3,800
Net (losses) gains on equity securities													$	(35	)	$	689		$	559		$	930
Net securities (losses) gains													$	(15	)	$	787		$	740		$	3,577

~~On January 1, 2020, Wesbanco adopted CECL. Upon adoption, the Company recognized $0.2 million to opening retained earnings, which represents the CECL allowance as of January 1, 2020.~~ The corporate and municipal bonds in Wesbanco’s held-to-maturity debt portfolio are analyzed quarterly to determine if an allowance for current expected credit losses is warranted. Wesbanco uses a database of historical financials of all corporate and municipal issuers and actual historic default and recovery rates on rated and non-rated transactions to estimate expected credit losses on an individual security basis. The expected credit losses are adjusted quarterly and are recorded in an allowance for expected credit losses on the balance sheet, which is deducted from the amortized cost basis of the held-to-maturity portfolio as a contra asset. The losses are recorded on the income statement in the provision for credit losses. Accrued interest receivable on held-to-maturity securities, which was ~~$6.3~~$7.1 million and $5.3 million as of September 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively, is excluded from the estimate of credit losses. Held-to-maturity investments in U.S. Government sponsored entities and agencies as well as mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations, which are all either issued by a direct governmental entity or a government-sponsored entity, have no historical evidence supporting expected credit losses; therefore, Wesbanco has estimated these losses at 0, and will monitor this assumption in the future for any economical or governmental policies that could affect this assumption.

The following table provides a roll-forward of the allowance for credit losses on held-to-maturity securities for the nine months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020:

	Allowance for Credit Losses By Category										Allowance for Credit Losses By Category
	For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2020										For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2021 and 2020
			Residential mortgage										Residential mortgage
			-backed										-backed
			securities and										securities and
			collateralized										collateralized
			mortgage obligations		Obligations of								mortgage obligations		Obligations of
	U.S. Government		of government		state and		Corporate				U.S. Government		of government		state and		Corporate
	sponsored		sponsored entities		political		debt				sponsored		sponsored entities		political		debt
(unaudited, in thousands)	entities and agencies		and agencies		subdivisions		Securities		Total		entities and agencies		and agencies		subdivisions		Securities			Total
Beginning balance at January 1, 2020	$	—	$	—	$	96	$	133	$	229
Balance at December 31, 2020											$	—	$	—	$	130	$	196		$	326
Current period provision		—		—		172		60		232		—		—		35		(104	)		(69	)
Write-offs		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—			—
Recoveries		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—			—
Ending balance at September 30, 2020	$	—	$	—	$	268	$	193	$	461
Balance at September 30, 2021											$	—	$	—	$	165	$	92		$	257
.
Balance at December 31, 2019											$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—		$	—
Impact of adopting ASC 326												—		—		96		133			229
Current period provision												—		—		172		60			232
Write-offs												—		—		—		—			—
Recoveries												—		—		—		—			—
Balance at September 30, 2020											$	—	$	—	$	268	$	193		$	461

The following ~~table provides~~tables provide information on unrealized losses on available-for-sale debt securities that have been in an unrealized loss position for less than twelve months and twelve months or more, for which an allowance for credit losses has not been recorded, as of September 30, ~~2020:~~2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively:

	September 30, 2020																					September 30, 2021
	Less than 12 months							12 months or more							Total							Less than 12 months							12 months or more							Total
(unaudited, dollars in thousands)	Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			# of Securities		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			# of Securities		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			# of Securities		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			# of Securities		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			# of Securities		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			# of Securities
U.S. Government sponsored entities and agencies	$	14,979	$	(6	)		1	$	—	$	—			—	$	14,979	$	(6	)		1	$	92,328	$	(1,421	)		7	$	17,919	$	(531	)		2	$	110,247	$	(1,952	)		9
Residential mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations of government sponsored entities and agencies		133,841		(632	)		23		14,257		(200	)		4		148,098		(832	)		27		1,202,988		(13,192	)		106		91,420		(1,437	)		17		1,294,408		(14,629	)		123
Commercial mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations of government sponsored entities and agencies		24,835		(59	)		3		—		—			—		24,835		(59	)		3		99,606		(337	)		20		39,204		(341	)		4		138,810		(678	)		24
Corporate debt securities		9,477		(21	)		6		—		—			—		9,477		(21	)		6
Obligations of state and political subdivisions																							7,458		(51	)		5		—		—			—		7,458		(51	)		5
Corporate debt and other securities																							4,499		(1	)		1		—		—			—		4,499		(1	)		1
Total	$	183,132	$	(718	)		33	$	14,257	$	(200	)		4	$	197,389	$	(918	)	$	37	$	1,406,879	$	(15,002	)		139	$	148,543	$	(2,309	)		23	$	1,555,422	$	(17,311	)		162

Unrealized losses on debt securities in the table above represents temporary fluctuations resulting from changes in market rates in relation to fixed yields. Unrealized losses in the available-for-sale portfolio are accounted for as an adjustment, net of taxes, to other comprehensive income in shareholders’ equity. Wesbanco does not believe the securities presented above are impaired due to reasons of credit quality, as substantially all debt securities are rated above investment grade and all are paying principal and interest according to their contractual terms. Wesbanco does not intend to

sell, nor is it more likely than not that it will be required to sell, loss position securities prior to recovery of their cost; therefore, management believes the unrealized losses detailed above do not require an allowance for credit losses relating to these securities to be recognized. Securities that do not have readily determinable fair values and for which Wesbanco does not exercise significant influence are carried at cost. Cost method investments consist primarily of ~~FHLB~~Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) of Pittsburgh ~~Cincinnati and Indianapolis~~ stock totaling ~~$44.7~~$17.0 million and ~~$66.8~~$34.0 million at September 30, ~~2020~~2021 and December 31, ~~2019,~~2020, respectively, and are included in other assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Cost method investments are evaluated for impairment whenever events or circumstances suggest that their carrying value may not be recoverable.

The following table provides information on unrealized losses on held-to-maturity and available-for-sale debt securities that have been in an unrealized loss position for less than twelve months and twelve months or more as of December 31, 2019, prior to the date of adoption of the credit loss standard, and as defined by the previous accounting guidance in effect at that time:

The recorded investment in loans is presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheets net of deferred loan fees and costs, and discounts on purchased loans. Net deferred loan fee income ~~(cost)~~ was ~~$13.3~~$1.7 million and ~~($4.8)~~$6.2 million at September 30, ~~2020~~2021 and December 31, ~~2019,~~2020, respectively. ~~The~~At September 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively, the balance also included ~~$19.5~~$10.4 million and $13.8 million of net deferred fee income from ~~PPP~~SBA Payroll Protection Program (“PPP”) loans. The un-accreted discount on purchased loans from acquisitions was ~~$44.1~~$28.9 million at September 30, ~~2020, including $23.9million related to OLBK,~~2021 and ~~$51.9~~$39.4 million at December 31, ~~2019.~~2020.

	September 30,		December 31,		September 30,		December 31,
(unaudited, in thousands)	2020		2019		2021		2020
Commercial real estate:
Land and construction	$	690,547	$	777,151	$	824,199	$	668,277
Improved property		5,018,101		4,947,857		4,833,687		5,037,115
Total commercial real estate		5,708,648		5,725,008		5,657,886		5,705,392
Commercial and industrial		1,654,116		1,644,699		1,435,154		1,681,182
Commercial and industrial - PPP		853,119		—		272,060		726,256
Residential real estate		1,798,019		1,873,647		1,655,229		1,720,961
Home equity		647,052		649,678		607,735		646,387
Consumer		328,592		374,953		285,101		309,055
Total portfolio loans		10,989,546		10,267,985		9,913,165		10,789,233
Loans held for sale		134,151		43,013		32,308		168,378
Total loans	$	11,123,697	$	10,310,998	$	9,945,473	$	10,957,611

~~On January 1, 2020, Wesbanco adopted ASU 2016-13 (Topic 326),~~ ~~Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments~~. Upon adoption, the Company recognized $41.4 million as an increase to the allowance for credit losses, which represents the difference in the incurred allowance as of December 31, 2019 and the CECL allowance as of January 1, 2020. This adjustment includes a $6.7 million increase to the allowance related to PCD loans as of January 1, 2020. See Note 1, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” for the Company’s revised accounting policies related to Loans and Allowance for Credit Losses and adoption of this standard.

The allowance for credit losses under ~~CECL~~the current expected credit losses methodology (“CECL”) is calculated utilizing the PDprobability of default (“PD”) / ~~LGD,~~loss given default (“LGD”), which is then discounted to net present value. PD is the probability the asset will default within a given time frame and LGD is the percentage of the asset not expected to be collected due to default. The primary macroeconomic drivers of the quantitative model include forecasts of national unemployment and interest rates, as well as modeling adjustments for changes in prepayment speeds, loan risk grades, portfolio mix, concentrations and loan growth. For the calculation as of September 30, ~~2020,~~2021, the one-year forecast was based upon a blended rate from two nationally-recognized published economic forecasts through September 30, ~~2020,~~2021, and is primarily driven by the national unemployment and interest rate spread forecasts. Wesbanco’s blended forecast of national unemployment, at quarter end, was projected to peak at ~~8.4%~~4.7% in the fourth quarter, and subsequently decrease to an average of ~~7.6%~~4.0% over the remainder of the forecast period. The calculation utilized a one-year reversion period back to the Company’s historical loss rate by loan classification. Included in the qualitative factors were COVID-19 pandemic factors related to the transient credit risk not ~~covered by~~included within the ~~traditional allowance process,~~quantitative model calculation, adjusted to Wesbanco’s regional footprint, deferred interest on modified loans, and hospitality industry ~~concentrations such as hospitality and retail.~~concentration. As of September 30, 2021, accrued interest receivable for loans was $48.1 million. Wesbanco made an accounting policy election to exclude accrued interest from the measurement of the allowance for credit losses because the Company has a robust policy in place to reverse or write-off accrued interest when loans are placed on non-accrual. However, Wesbanco does have a ~~$0.4~~$0.1 million reserve on the accrued interest related to loan modifications allowed under the CARES Act due to the timing and nature of these modifications. As of September 30, ~~2020,~~2021, accrued interest receivable ~~for loans was $52.4 million, including $24.0 million~~ related to COVID-19 loan modifications as permitted under the CARES ~~Act.~~Act was $23.1 million.

The following tables summarize changes in the allowance for credit losses applicable to each category of the loan portfolio:

	Allowance for Credit Losses By Category																								Allowance for Credit Losses By Category
	For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2020 and 2019																								For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2021 and 2020
(unaudited, in thousands)	Commercial Real Estate - Land and Construction			Commercial Real Estate- Improved Property			Commercial & Industrial			Residential Real Estate			Home Equity			Consumer			Deposit Overdrafts			Total			Commercial Real Estate - Land and Construction			Commercial Real Estate- Improved Property			Commercial & Industrial			Residential Real Estate			Home Equity			Consumer			Deposit Overdrafts			Total
Balance at December 31, 2020
Allowance for credit losses - loans																									$	10,841		$	110,652		$	37,850		$	17,851		$	1,487		$	6,507		$	639		$	185,827
Allowance for credit losses - loan commitments																										6,508			712			1,275			955			45			19			—			9,514
Total beginning allowance for credit losses - loans and loan commitments																										17,349			111,364			39,125			18,806			1,532			6,526			639			195,341
Provision for credit losses:
Provision for loan losses																										(3,665	)		(29,171	)		(10,669	)		(3,481	)		(877	)		(2,268	)		1,709			(48,422	)
Provision for loan commitments																										(2,829	)		(394	)		451			254			7			287			—			(2,224	)
Total provision for credit losses - loans and loan commitments																										(6,494	)		(29,565	)		(10,218	)		(3,227	)		(870	)		(1,981	)		1,709			(50,646	)
Charge-offs																										(22	)		(933	)		(1,717	)		(842	)		(382	)		(2,210	)		(932	)		(7,038	)
Recoveries																										110			1,053			1,737			885			471			1,718			264			6,238
Net (charge-offs) recoveries																										88			120			20			43			89			(492	)		(668	)		(800	)
Balance at September 30, 2021
Allowance for credit losses - loans																										7,264			81,601			27,201			14,413			699			3,747			1,680			136,605
Allowance for credit losses - loan commitments																										3,679			318			1,726			1,209			52			306			—			7,290
Total ending allowance for credit losses - loans and loan commitments																									$	10,943		$	81,919		$	28,927		$	15,622		$	751		$	4,053		$	1,680		$	143,895

Balance at December 31, 2019
Allowance for credit losses - loans	$	4,949		$	20,293		$	14,116		$	4,311		$	4,422		$	2,951		$	1,387		$	52,429		$	4,949		$	20,293		$	14,116		$	4,311		$	4,422		$	2,951		$	1,387		$	52,429
Allowance for credit losses - loan commitments		235			22			311			15			250			41			—			874			235			22			311			15			250			41			—			874
Total beginning allowance for credit losses - loans and loan commitments		5,184			20,315			14,427			4,326			4,672			2,992			1,387			53,303			5,184			20,315			14,427			4,326			4,672			2,992			1,387			53,303
Impact of adopting ASC 326		1,524			13,078			22,357			5,630			(3,936	)		2,576			213			41,442			1,524			13,078			22,357			5,630			(3,936	)		2,576			213			41,442
Provision for credit losses:
Provision for loan losses		9,150			73,774			9,923			2,779			1,793			3,160			139			100,718			9,150			73,774			9,923			2,779			1,793			3,160			139			100,718
Provision for loan commitments		5,888			—			858			199			52			3			—			7,000			5,888			—			858			199			52			3			—			7,000
Total provision for credit losses - loans and loan commitments		15,038			73,774			10,781			2,978			1,845			3,163			139			107,718			15,038			73,774			10,781			2,978			1,845			3,163			139			107,718
Charge-offs		(51	)		(1,903	)		(3,329	)		(809	)		(857	)		(2,860	)		(760	)		(10,569	)		(51	)		(1,903	)		(3,329	)		(809	)		(857	)		(2,860	)		(760	)		(10,569	)
Recoveries		85			702			852			487			419			1,136			363			4,044			85			702			852			487			419			1,136			363			4,044
Net charge-offs		34			(1,201	)		(2,477	)		(322	)		(438	)		(1,724	)		(397	)		(6,525	)
Net (charge-offs) recoveries																										34			(1,201	)		(2,477	)		(322	)		(438	)		(1,724	)		(397	)		(6,525	)
Balance at September 30, 2020
Allowance for credit losses - loans		13,055			105,966			43,648			12,018			2,076			7,004			1,342			185,109			13,055			105,966			43,648			12,018			2,076			7,004			1,342			185,109
Allowance for credit losses - loan commitments		8,725			—			1,440			594			67			3			—			10,829			8,725			—			1,440			594			67			3			—			10,829
Total ending allowance for credit losses - loans and loan commitments	$	21,780		$	105,966		$	45,088		$	12,612		$	2,143		$	7,007		$	1,342		$	195,938		$	21,780		$	105,966		$	45,088		$	12,612		$	2,143		$	7,007		$	1,342		$	195,938

Balance at December 31, 2018
Allowance for loan losses	$	4,039		$	20,848		$	12,114		$	3,822		$	4,356		$	2,797		$	972		$	48,948
Allowance for loan commitments		169			33			262			12			226			39			—			741
Total beginning allowance for credit losses		4,208			20,881			12,376			3,834			4,582			2,836			972			49,689
Provision for credit losses:
Provision for loan losses		(207	)		2,939			2,549			561			727			405			1,503			8,477
Provision for loan commitments		26			(9	)		842			3			37			(1	)		—			898
Total provision for credit losses		(181	)		2,930			3,391			564			764			404			1,503			9,375
Charge-offs		(45	)		(515	)		(1,420	)		(870	)		(859	)		(1,886	)		(1,273	)		(6,868	)
Recoveries		255			621			545			272			341			1,432			294			3,760
Net charge-offs		210			106			(875	)		(598	)		(518	)		(454	)		(979	)		(3,108	)
Balance at September 30, 2019
Allowance for loan losses		4,042			23,893			13,788			3,785			4,565			2,748			1,496			54,317
Allowance for loan commitments		195			24			1,104			15			263			38			—			1,639
Total ending allowance for credit losses	$	4,237		$	23,917		$	14,892		$	3,800		$	4,828		$	2,786		$	1,496		$	55,956

The following tables present the allowance for credit losses and recorded investments in loans by category, as of each period-end:

	Allowance for Credit Losses and Recorded Investment in Loans																Allowance for Credit Losses and Recorded Investment in Loans
(unaudited, in thousands)	Commercial Real Estate- Land and Construction		Commercial Real Estate- Improved Property		Commercial and Industrial		Residential Real Estate		Home Equity		Consumer		Deposit Over- drafts		Total		Commercial Real Estate- Land and Construction		Commercial Real Estate- Improved Property		Commercial and Industrial		Residential Real Estate		Home Equity		Consumer		Deposit Over- drafts		Total
September 30, 2020
September 30, 2021
Allowance for credit losses:
Loans individually-evaluated	$	597	$	3,857	$	1,438	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	5,892	$	417	$	16,456	$	409	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	17,282
Loans collectively-evaluated		12,458		102,109		42,210		12,018		2,076		7,004		1,342		179,217		6,847		65,145		26,792		14,413		699		3,747		1,680		119,323
Loan commitments		8,725		—		1,440		594		67		3		—		10,829		3,679		318		1,726		1,209		52		306		—		7,290
Total allowance for credit losses - loans and commitments	$	21,780	$	105,966	$	45,088	$	12,612	$	2,143	$	7,007	$	1,342	$	195,938	$	10,943	$	81,919	$	28,927	$	15,622	$	751	$	4,053	$	1,680	$	143,895

Portfolio loans:
Individually-evaluated for credit losses⁽¹⁾	$	1,481	$	17,278	$	4,006	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	22,765
Individually-evaluated for credit losses																	$	1,291	$	76,276	$	641	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	78,208
Collectively-evaluated for credit losses		689,066		5,000,823		2,503,229		1,798,019		647,052		328,592		—		10,966,781		822,908		4,757,411		1,706,573		1,655,229		607,735		285,101		—		9,834,957
Total portfolio loans	$	690,547	$	5,018,101	$	2,507,235	$	1,798,019	$	647,052	$	328,592	$	—	$	10,989,546	$	824,199	$	4,833,687	$	1,707,214	$	1,655,229	$	607,735	$	285,101	$	—	$	9,913,165

December 31, 2019
December 31, 2020
Allowance for credit losses:
Allowance for loans individually evaluated for impairment	$	—	$	93	$	10	$	14	$	6	$	1	$	—	$	124
Allowance for loans collectively evaluated for impairment		4,949		20,200		14,106		4,297		4,416		2,950		1,387		52,305
Allowance for loan commitments		235		22		311		15		250		41		—		874
Total allowance for credit losses	$	5,184	$	20,315	$	14,427	$	4,326	$	4,672	$	2,992	$	1,387	$	53,303
Loans individually-evaluated																	$	602	$	4,196	$	1,484	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	6,282
Loans collectively-evaluated																		10,239		106,456		36,366		17,851		1,487		6,507		639		179,545
Loan commitments																		6,508		712		1,275		955		45		19		—		9,514
Total allowance for credit losses - loans and commitments																	$	17,349	$	111,364	$	39,125	$	18,806	$	1,532	$	6,526	$	639	$	195,341

Portfolio loans:
Individually evaluated for impairment ⁽¹⁾	$	—	$	3,907	$	11,961	$	4,392	$	704	$	53	$	—	$	21,017
Collectively evaluated for impairment		777,033		4,935,383		1,631,855		1,865,151		648,221		374,812		—		10,232,455
Acquired with deteriorated credit quality		118		8,567		883		4,104		753		88		—		14,513
Individually-evaluated for credit losses																	$	1,455	$	40,372	$	2,863	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	44,690
Collectively-evaluated for credit losses																		666,822		4,996,743		2,404,575		1,720,961		646,387		309,055		—		10,744,543
Total portfolio loans	$	777,151	$	4,947,857	$	1,644,699	$	1,873,647	$	649,678	$	374,953	$	—	$	10,267,985	$	668,277	$	5,037,115	$	2,407,438	$	1,720,961	$	646,387	$	309,055	$	—	$	10,789,233

Commercial loan risk grades are determined based on an evaluation of the relevant characteristics of each loan, assigned at inception and adjusted thereafter at any time to reflect changes in the risk profile throughout the life of each loan. The primary factors used to determine the risk grade are the sufficiency, reliability and sustainability of the primary source of repayment and overall financial strength of the borrower. The rating system more heavily weights the debt service coverage, leverage and loan to value factors to derive the risk grade. Other factors that are considered at a lesser weighting include management, industry or property type risks, payment history, collateral or guarantees.

Commercial real estate – land and construction consists of loans to finance investments in vacant land, land development, construction of residential housing, and construction of commercial buildings. Commercial real estate – improved property consists of loans for the purchase or refinance of all types of improved owner-occupied and investment properties. Factors that are considered in assigning the risk grade vary depending on the type of property financed. The risk grade assigned to construction and development loans is based on the overall viability of the project, the experience and financial capacity of the developer or builder to successfully complete the project, project specific and market absorption rates and comparable property values, and the amount of pre-sales for residential housing construction or pre-leases for commercial investment property. The risk grade assigned to commercial investment property loans is based primarily on the adequacy of the net operating income generated by the property to service the debt (“debt service coverage”), the loan to appraised value, the type, quality, industry and mix of tenants, and the terms of leases. The risk grade assigned to owner-occupied commercial real estate is based primarily on global debt service coverage and the leverage of the business, but may also consider the industry in which the business operates, the business’ specific competitive advantages or disadvantages, collateral margins and the quality and experience of management.

Commercial and industrial (“C&I&I”) loans consist of revolving lines of credit to finance accounts receivable, inventory and other general business purposes; term loans to finance fixed assets other than real estate, and letters of credit to support trade, insurance or governmental requirements for a variety of businesses. Most C&I borrowers are privately-held companies with annual sales up to $100 million. Primary factors that are considered in risk rating C&I loans include debt service coverage and leverage. Other factors including operating trends, collateral coverage along with management experience are also considered.

Pass loans are those that exhibit a history of positive financial results that are at least comparable to the average for their industry or type of real estate. The primary source of repayment is acceptable and these loans are expected to perform satisfactorily during most economic cycles. Pass loans typically have no significant external factors that are expected to adversely affect these borrowers more than others in the same industry or property type. Any minor unfavorable characteristics of these loans are outweighed or mitigated by other positive factors including but not limited to adequate secondary or tertiary sources of repayment.

Criticized loans, considered as compromised, have potential weaknesses that deserve management's close attention. If left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects for the asset or in the bank's credit position at some future date. Criticized loans are not adversely classified by the banking regulators and do not expose the bank to sufficient risk to warrant adverse classification.

Classified loans, considered as substandard and doubtful, are equivalent to the classifications used by banking regulators. Substandard loans are inadequately protected by the current sound worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. Loans so classified must have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. They are characterized by the distinct possibility that the bank will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected. These loans may or may not be reported as non-accrual. Doubtful loans have all the weaknesses inherent in those classified substandard, with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently known facts, conditions, and values, highly questionable and improbable. These loans are reported as non-accrual.

	Commercial Loans by Internally Assigned Risk Grade								Commercial Loans by Internally Assigned Risk Grade
(unaudited, in thousands)	Commercial Real Estate- Land and Construction		Commercial Real Estate- Improved Property		Commercial & Industrial		Total Commercial Loans		Commercial Real Estate- Land and Construction		Commercial Real Estate- Improved Property		Commercial & Industrial		Total Commercial Loans
As of September 30, 2020
As of September 30, 2021
Pass	$	664,518	$	4,736,970	$	2,457,537	$	7,859,025	$	795,033	$	4,502,015	$	1,650,749	$	6,947,797
Criticized - compromised		21,948		199,030		27,286		248,264		26,436		240,958		22,887		290,281
Classified - substandard		4,081		82,101		22,412		108,594		2,730		90,714		33,578		127,022
Classified - doubtful		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Total	$	690,547	$	5,018,101	$	2,507,235	$	8,215,883	$	824,199	$	4,833,687	$	1,707,214	$	7,365,100

As of December 31, 2019
As of December 31, 2020
Pass	$	769,537	$	4,807,003	$	1,570,689	$	7,147,229	$	657,435	$	4,609,726	$	2,350,724	$	7,617,885
Criticized - compromised		4,338		65,612		49,009		118,959		7,397		320,301		34,597		362,295
Classified - substandard		3,276		75,242		13,231		91,749		3,445		107,088		22,117		132,650
Classified - doubtful		—		—		11,770		11,770		—		—		—		—
Total	$	777,151	$	4,947,857	$	1,644,699	$	7,369,707	$	668,277	$	5,037,115	$	2,407,438	$	8,112,830

Residential real estate, home equity and consumer loans are not assigned internal risk grades other than as required by regulatory guidelines that are based primarily on the age of past due loans. Wesbanco primarily evaluates the credit quality of residential real estate, home equity and consumer loans based on repayment performance and historical loss rates. The aggregate amount of residential real estate, home equity and consumer loans classified as substandard in accordance with regulatory guidelines was ~~$30.0~~$29.4 million at September 30, ~~2020~~2021 and ~~$28.3~~$27.7 million at December 31, ~~2019,~~2020, of which ~~$6.9~~$6.2 million and ~~$5.1~~$4.1 million were accruing, for each period, respectively. ~~The aggregate amount of residential real estate, home equity and consumer~~These loans ~~classified as substandard, as well as $28.2~~are not included in the tables above. In addition, $20.4 million and ~~$15.6~~$28.7 million of unfunded commercial loan commitments, are also not included in the tables above at September 30, ~~2020~~2021 and December 31, ~~2019,~~2020, respectively.

~~Acquired OLBK Loans~~ —In conjunction with the OLBK acquisition, Wesbanco acquired loans with a book value of $2,570.0 million as of November 22, 2019. These loans were recorded at the preliminary fair value of $2,514.1 million, with $2,544.4 million categorized as ASC 310-20 loans, of which $56.6 million of loans were sold during the first quarter of 2020 for $36.4 million. For the loans sold, the acquisition date fair value was adjusted to the sale price resulting in no recognized gain or loss. The fair market value adjustment on the loans retained of $28.9 million at acquisition date is expected to be recognized into interest income on a level yield basis over the remaining expected life of the loans. Loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality (ASC 310-30) with a book value of $25.6 million were recorded at the preliminary fair value of $18.7 million, of which $4.0 million were accounted for under the cost recovery method as cash flows could not be reasonably estimated, and therefore they are categorized as non-accrual. Upon adoption of CECL on January 1, 2020, $6.1 million of credit mark on OLBK PCD loans was reclassified to allowance for credit losses. At September 30, 2020, the remaining allowance for credit losses on individually analyzed OLBK-acquired loans was $5.1 million. The carrying amount of loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality at September 30, 2020 was $19.6 million, while the outstanding customer balance was $20.0 million, and included $2.0 million of non-performing loans.

	Age Analysis of Loans														Age Analysis of Loans
(unaudited, in thousands)	Current		30-59 Days Past Due		60-89 Days Past Due		90 Days or More Past Due		Total Past Due		Total Loans		90 Days or More Past Due and Accruing (1)		Current		30-59 Days Past Due		60-89 Days Past Due		90 Days or More Past Due		Total Past Due		Total Loans		90 Days or More Past Due and Accruing (1)
As of September 30, 2020
As of September 30, 2021
Commercial real estate:
Land and construction	$	688,200	$	148	$	813	$	1,386	$	2,347	$	690,547	$	572	$	821,068	$	671	$	1,060	$	1,400	$	3,131	$	824,199	$	1,256
Improved property		5,003,740		2,318		2,153		9,890		14,361		5,018,101		896		4,813,893		8,721		2,146		8,927		19,794		4,833,687		2,308
Total commercial real estate		5,691,940		2,466		2,966		11,276		16,708		5,708,648		1,468		5,634,961		9,392		3,206		10,327		22,925		5,657,886		3,564
Commercial and industrial		2,500,038		2,164		781		4,252		7,197		2,507,235		1,882		1,689,657		5,200		4,355		8,002		17,557		1,707,214		4,781
Residential real estate		1,776,074		1,822		3,604		16,519		21,945		1,798,019		5,491		1,636,941		2,218		3,496		12,574		18,288		1,655,229		1,746
Home equity		640,025		3,006		354		3,667		7,027		647,052		937		600,760		3,006		240		3,729		6,975		607,735		851
Consumer		325,925		1,405		771		491		2,667		328,592		392		281,435		2,528		640		498		3,666		285,101		310
Total portfolio loans		10,934,002		10,863		8,476		36,205		55,544		10,989,546		10,170		9,843,754		22,344		11,937		35,130		69,411		9,913,165		11,252
Loans held for sale		134,151		—		—		—		—		134,151		—		32,308		—		—		—		—		32,308		—
Total loans	$	11,068,153	$	10,863	$	8,476	$	36,205	$	55,544	$	11,123,697	$	10,170	$	9,876,062	$	22,344	$	11,937	$	35,130	$	69,411	$	9,945,473	$	11,252

Nonperforming loans included above are as follows:
Non-accrual loans	$	9,622	$	1,120	$	559	$	25,965		27,644	$	37,266			$	11,245	$	408	$	1,067	$	23,539	$	25,014	$	36,259
TDRs accruing interest ⁽¹⁾		3,799		68		254		70		392		4,191
Total non-performing	$	13,421	$	1,188	$	813	$	26,035	$	28,036	$	41,457
TDRs accruing interest																3,244		3		121		339		463		3,707
Total nonperforming loans															$	14,489	$	411	$	1,188	$	23,878	$	25,477	$	39,966

As of December 31, 2019
As of December 31, 2020
Commercial real estate:
Land and construction	$	776,153	$	529	$	121	$	348	$	998	$	777,151	$	26	$	664,990	$	582	$	2,276	$	429	$	3,287	$	668,277	$	288
Improved property		4,921,721		10,207		5,639		10,290		26,136		4,947,857		4,709		5,016,812		4,876		4,118		11,309		20,303		5,037,115		2,713
Total commercial real estate		5,697,874		10,736		5,760		10,638		27,134		5,725,008		4,735		5,681,802		5,458		6,394		11,738		23,590		5,705,392		3,001
Commercial and industrial		1,635,232		2,519		2,813		4,135		9,467		1,644,699		1,793		2,395,844		4,372		2,197		5,025		11,594		2,407,438		1,899
Residential real estate		1,850,806		4,421		5,372		13,048		22,841		1,873,647		3,643		1,698,636		2,614		5,654		14,057		22,325		1,720,961		2,863
Home equity		641,026		3,323		621		4,708		8,652		649,678		985		639,319		2,414		775		3,879		7,068		646,387		706
Consumer		370,934		2,537		965		517		4,019		374,953		457		305,483		1,998		1,031		543		3,572		309,055		377
Total portfolio loans		10,195,872		23,536		15,531		33,046		72,113		10,267,985		11,613		10,721,084		16,856		16,051		35,242		68,149		10,789,233		8,846
Loans held for sale		43,013		—		—		—		—		43,013		—		168,378		—		—		—		—		168,378		—
Total loans	$	10,238,885	$	23,536	$	15,531	$	33,046	$	72,113	$	10,310,998	$	11,613	$	10,889,462	$	16,856	$	16,051	$	35,242	$	68,149	$	10,957,611	$	8,846

Impaired loans included above are as follows:
Nonperforming loans included above are as follows:
Non-accrual loans	$	21,061	$	897	$	1,559	$	21,396		23,852	$	44,913			$	9,560	$	630	$	466	$	26,224	$	27,320	$	36,880
TDRs accruing interest ⁽¹⁾		5,113		151		130		37		318		5,431
Total impaired	$	26,174	$	1,048	$	1,689	$	21,433	$	24,170	$	50,344
TDRs accruing interest																3,540		63		152		172		387		3,927
Total nonperforming loans															$	13,100	$	693	$	618	$	26,396	$	27,707	$	40,807

	Nonperforming Loans												Nonperforming Loans
	September 30, 2020						December 31, 2019						September 30, 2021						December 31, 2020
	Unpaid						Unpaid						Unpaid						Unpaid
	Principal		Recorded		Related		Principal		Recorded		Related		Principal		Recorded		Related		Principal		Recorded		Related
(unaudited, in thousands)	Balance (1)		Investment		Allowance		Balance (1)		Investment		Allowance		Balance (1)		Investment		Allowance		Balance (1)		Investment		Allowance
With no related specific allowance recorded:
Commercial real estate:
Land and construction	$	1,047	$	997	$	—	$	616	$	580	$	—	$	1,175	$	145	$	—	$	469	$	469	$	—
Improved property		10,481		8,983		—		5,097		4,229		—		7,555		5,870		—		9,597		8,055	—
Commercial and industrial		3,817		2,832		—		15,182		14,313		—		6,228		5,373		—		4,401		3,413	—
Residential real estate		22,965		20,519		—		17,753		15,952		—		25,964		20,655		—		23,055		20,704	—
Home equity		6,693		5,681		—		6,523		5,610		—		6,914		5,321		—		6,635		5,708	—
Consumer		604		351		—		546		413		—		843		518		—		602		364	—
Total nonperforming loans without a specific allowance		45,607		39,363		—		45,717		41,097		—		48,679		37,882		—		44,759		38,713		—
With a specific allowance recorded:
Commercial real estate:
Land and construction		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—	—		—		—
Improved property		2,094		2,094		95		4,207		3,907		93		2,285		2,084		257		2,094		2,094		136
Commercial and industrial		—		—		—		193		191		10		—		—		—	—		—		—
Residential real estate		—		—		—		4,772		4,392		14		—		—		—	—		—		—
Home equity		—		—		—		724		704		6		—		—		—	—		—		—
Consumer		—		—		—		104		53		1		—		—		—	—		—		—
Total nonperforming loans with a specific allowance		2,094		2,094		95		10,000		9,247		124		2,285		2,084		257		2,094		2,094		136
Total nonperforming loans	$	47,701	$	41,457	$	95	$	55,717	$	50,344	$	124	$	50,964	$	39,966	$	257	$	46,853	$	40,807	$	136

	Nonperforming Loans																	Nonperforming Loans
	For the Three Months Ended									For the Nine Months Ended								For the Three Months Ended										For the Nine Months Ended
	September 30, 2020					September 30, 2019				September 30, 2020				September 30, 2019				September 30, 2021					September 30, 2020					September 30, 2021				September 30, 2020
	Average		Interest			Average		Interest		Average		Interest		Average		Interest		Average		Interest			Average		Interest			Average		Interest		Average		Interest
	Recorded		Income			Recorded		Income		Recorded		Income		Recorded		Income		Recorded		Income			Recorded		Income			Recorded		Income		Recorded		Income
(unaudited, in thousands)	Investment		Recognized			Investment		Recognized		Investment		Recognized		Investment		Recognized		Investment		Recognized			Investment		Recognized			Investment		Recognized		Investment		Recognized
With no related specific allowance recorded:
Commercial real estate:
Land and construction	$	801	$	—		$	425	$	—	$	597	$	—	$	284	$	—	$	110	$	—		$	801	$	—		$	202	$	—	$	597	$	—
Improved property		8,454		16			7,647		—		6,977		51		7,962		—		6,271		6			8,454		16			6,987		23		6,977		51
Commercial and industrial		2,864		(1	)		2,614		—		5,717		5		2,931		—		5,021		(2	)		2,864		(1	)		3,783		1		5,717		5
Residential real estate		20,307		38			12,600		—		19,388		136		13,752		—		21,549		(15	)		20,307		38			21,198		125		19,388		136
Home equity		5,849		4			4,740		—		5,830		16		4,760		—		5,544		—			5,849		4			5,591		9		5,830		16
Consumer		372		1			334		—		381		2		425		—		411		1			372		1			384		2		381		2
Total nonperforming loans without a specific allowance		38,647		58			28,360		—		38,890		210		30,114		—		38,906		(10	)		38,647		58			38,145		160		38,890		210
With a specific allowance recorded:
Commercial real estate:
Land and construction		—		—			—		—				—		—		—		—		—			—		—			—		—		—		—
Improved property		2,363		—			5,273		35		2,816		—		3,170		63		2,084		—			2,363		—			2,087		—		2,816		—
Commercial and industrial		—		—			189		4		48		—		171		11		—		—			—		—			—		—		48		—
Residential real estate		—		—			4,792		51		1,098		—		3,666		169		—		—			—		—			—		—		1,098		—
Home equity		—		—			834		8		176		—		616		23		—		—			—		—			—		—		176		—
Consumer		—		—			68		1		13		—		60		3		—		—			—		—			—		—		13		—
Total nonperforming loans with a specific allowance		2,363		—			11,156		99		4,151		—		7,683		269		2,084		—			2,363		—			2,087		—		4,151		—
Total nonperforming loans	$	41,010	$	58		$	39,516	$	99	$	43,041	$	210	$	37,797	$	269	$	40,990	$	(10	)	$	41,010	$	58		$	40,232	$	160	$	43,041	$	210

The following tables present the recorded investment in non-accrual loans and TDRs:

	Non-accrual Loans ⁽¹⁾				Non-accrual Loans ⁽¹⁾
	September 30,		December 31,		September 30,		December 31,
(unaudited, in thousands)	2020		2019		2021		2020
Commercial real estate:
Land and construction	$	997	$	580	$	145	$	469
Improved property		10,410		6,815		7,572		9,494
Total commercial real estate		11,407		7,395		7,717		9,963
Commercial and industrial		2,716		14,313		5,350		3,302
Residential real estate		17,492		16,867		17,643		17,925
Home equity		5,327		5,903		5,061		5,345
Consumer		324		435		488		345
Total	$	37,266	$	44,913	$	36,259	$	36,880

	TDRs												TDRs
	September 30, 2020						December 31, 2019						September 30, 2021						December 31, 2020
(unaudited, in thousands)	Accruing		Non-Accrual		Total		Accruing		Non-Accrual		Total		Accruing		Non-Accrual		Total		Accruing		Non-Accrual		Total
Commercial real estate:
Land and construction	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Improved property		667		174		841		1,321		191		1,512		382		138		520		655		165		820
Total commercial real estate		667		174		841		1,321		191		1,512		382		138		520		655		165		820
Commercial and industrial		116		—		116		191		—		191		23		—		23		111		—		111
Residential real estate		3,027		1,311		4,338		3,477		909		4,386		3,012		1,213		4,225		2,779		1,354		4,133
Home equity		354		324		678		411		293		704		260		264		524		363		300		663
Consumer		27		9		36		31		29		60		30		—		30		19		9		28
Total	$	4,191	$	1,818	$	6,009	$	5,431	$	1,422	$	6,853	$	3,707	$	1,615	$	5,322	$	3,927	$	1,828	$	5,755

As of September 30, ~~2020~~2021 and December 31, ~~2019,~~2020, there were 0 TDRs greater than $1.0 million. The concessions granted in the majority of loans reported as accruing and non-accrual TDRs are extensions of the maturity date or the amortization period, reductions in the interest rate below the prevailing market rate for loans with comparable characteristics, and/or permitting interest-only payments for longer than six months. Wesbanco had no unfunded commitments to debtors whose loans were classified as ~~impaired of $0.2 million and $3.3 million~~nonperforming as of September 30, ~~2020~~2021 and $0.9 million as of December 31, ~~2019, respectively.~~2020.

The following tables present details related to loans identified as TDRs during the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2020~~2021 and ~~2019,~~2020, respectively:

	New TDRs (1)												New TDRs (1)
	For the Three Months Ended												For the Three Months Ended
	September 30, 2020						September 30, 2019						September 30, 2021						September 30, 2020
			Pre-		Post-				Pre-		Post-				Pre-		Post-				Pre-		Post-
			Modification		Modification				Modification		Modification				Modification		Modification				Modification		Modification
			Outstanding		Outstanding				Outstanding		Outstanding				Outstanding		Outstanding				Outstanding		Outstanding
	Number of		Recorded		Recorded		Number of		Recorded		Recorded		Number of		Recorded		Recorded		Number of		Recorded		Recorded
(unaudited, dollars in thousands)	Modifications		Investment		Investment		Modifications		Investment		Investment		Modifications		Investment		Investment		Modifications		Investment		Investment
Commercial real estate:
Land and construction		—	$	—	$	—		—	$	—	$	—		—	$	—	$	—		—	$	—	$	—
Improved Property		—		—		—		1		605		604
Improved property														—		—		—		—		—		—
Total commercial real estate		—		—		—		1		605		604		—		—		—		—		—		—
Commercial and industrial		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Residential real estate		—		—		—		—		—		—		1		102		101		—		—		—
Home equity		3		31		30		—		—		—		—		—		—		3		31		30
Consumer		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Total		3	$	31	$	30		1	$	605	$	604		1	$	102	$	101		3	$	31	$	30

	New TDRs (1)												New TDRs (1)
	For the Nine Months Ended												For the Nine Months Ended
	September 30, 2020						September 30, 2019						September 30, 2021						September 30, 2020
			Pre-		Post-				Pre-		Post-				Pre-		Post-				Pre-		Post-
			Modification		Modification				Modification		Modification				Modification		Modification				Modification		Modification
			Outstanding		Outstanding				Outstanding		Outstanding				Outstanding		Outstanding				Outstanding		Outstanding
	Number of		Recorded		Recorded		Number of		Recorded		Recorded		Number of		Recorded		Recorded		Number of		Recorded		Recorded
(unaudited, dollars in thousands)	Modifications		Investment		Investment		Modifications		Investment		Investment		Modifications		Investment		Investment		Modifications		Investment		Investment
Commercial real estate:
Land and construction		—	$	—	$	—		—	$	—	$	—		—	$	—	$	—		—	$	—	$	—
Improved Property		—		—		—		1		610		604
Improved property														—		—		—		—		—		—
Total commercial real estate		—		—		—		1		610		604		—		—		—		—		—		—
Commercial and industrial		—		—		—		1		44		37		—		—		—		—		—		—
Residential real estate		2		332		327		4		194		183		1		103		101		2		332		327
Home equity		4		82		77		2		187		184		1		57		55		4		82		77
Consumer		1		8		7		1		15		12		—		—		—		1		8		7
Total		7	$	422	$	411		9	$	1,050	$	1,020		2	$	160	$	156		7	$	422	$	411

The following table summarizes TDRs which defaulted (defined as past due 90 days) during the nine months ended September 30, ~~2020~~2021 and ~~2019,~~2020, respectively, that were restructured within the last twelve months prior to September 30, ~~2020~~2021 and ~~2019,~~2020, respectively:

	Defaulted TDRs ⁽¹⁾								Defaulted TDRs ⁽¹⁾
	For the Nine Months Ended								For the Nine Months Ended
	September 30, 2020				September 30, 2019				September 30, 2021				September 30, 2020
	Number of		Recorded		Number of		Recorded		Number of		Recorded		Number of		Recorded
(unaudited, dollars in thousands)	Defaults		Investment		Defaults		Investment		Defaults		Investment		Defaults		Investment
Commercial real estate:
Land and construction		—	$	—		—	$	—		—	$	—		—	$	—
Improved property		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Total commercial real estate		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Commercial and industrial		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Residential real estate		1		155		1		96		1		234		1		155
Home equity		—		—		1		100		—		—		—		—
Consumer		—		—		1		12		—		—		—		—
Total		1	$	155		3	$	208		1	$	234		1	$	155

TDRs that default are placed on non-accrual status unless they are both well-secured and in the process of collection. The loans in the table above were not accruing interest.

Section 4013 of the CARES Act allows financial institutions the option to temporarily suspend certain requirements under ~~U.S.~~ GAAP related to TDRs for a limited period of time during the COVID-19 pandemic. These customers must meet certain criteria, such as they were in good standing and not more than 30 days past due either as of December 31, 2019, or as of the implementation of the modification program under the Interagency Statement, as well as other requirements noted in the regulatory agencies’ revised statement. Based on this guidance, Wesbanco does not classify the COVID-19 loan modifications as TDRs, nor are the customers considered past due with ~~regards~~regard to their delayed payments. Upon exiting the loan modification deferral program, the measurement of loan delinquency will resume where it left off upon entry into the program. Under the CARES Act, Wesbanco has modified approximately 3,553 loans totaling $2.2 billion, of which ~~$0.7 billion~~$132.8 million remain in their deferral period as of September 30, ~~2020.~~2021. Wesbanco originally offered three to six months of deferred payments to commercial and retail customers impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic depending on the type of loan and the industry for commercial loans. In the fourth quarter of 2020, Wesbanco offered up to an additional twelve months of deferred payments to certain commercial loan customers, predominantly in the hospitality industry, based on specific criteria related to the borrower, the underlying property and the potential for guarantors / co-borrowers. On December 27, 2020, the Economic Aid to Hard-Hit Small Businesses, Nonprofits and Venues Act (“Economic Aid Act”) was signed into law and among other things, extended the relief granted by the CARES Act for TDRs, initially slated to end on December 31, 2020, by one year to December 31, 2021.

The following ~~table summarizes~~tables summarize amortized cost basis loan balances by year of origination and credit quality indicator:

		Loans As of September 30, 2020																											Loans As of September 30, 2021
		Amortized Cost Basis by Origination Year																											Amortized Cost Basis by Origination Year
(unaudited, in thousands)		2020			2019			2018			2017			2016			Prior			Revolving Loans Amortized Cost Basis			Revolving Loans Converted to Term		Total				2021		2020		2019		2018		2017		Prior		Revolving Loans Amortized Cost Basis		Revolving Loans Converted to Term		Total
Commercial real estate: land and construction	Commercial real estate: land and construction																											Commercial real estate: land and construction
Risk rating:
Pass		$	94,649		$	300,505		$	147,081		$	45,476		$	19,249		$	34,425		$	23,133		$	—	$	664,518			$	115,953	$	217,186	$	220,804	$	107,065	$	32,401	$	32,743	$	32,400	$	36,481	$	795,033
Criticized - compromised			—			135			2,059			14,320			80			1,717			3,637			—		21,948				217		3,051		1,688		19,835		-		255		764		626		26,436
Classified - substandard			—			—			806			58			293			2,924			—			—		4,081				—		73		—		—		—		1,401		—		1,256		2,730
Classified - doubtful			—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—		—				—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Total		$	94,649		$	300,640		$	149,946		$	59,854		$	19,622		$	39,066		$	26,770		$	—	$	690,547			$	116,170	$	220,310	$	222,492	$	126,900	$	32,401	$	34,399	$	33,164	$	38,363	$	824,199
Commercial real estate: land and construction
Current-period net charge-offs		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	61		$	(50	)	$	23		$	—		$	—	$	34

Commercial real estate: improved property	Commercial real estate: improved property																											Commercial real estate: improved property
Risk rating:
Pass		$	561,381		$	756,494		$	629,690		$	525,306		$	668,523		$	1,468,243		$	127,333		$	—	$	4,736,970			$	506,709	$	702,779	$	623,518	$	496,064	$	420,887	$	1,665,439	$	63,406	$	23,213	$	4,502,015
Criticized - compromised			—			19,715			9,825			48,237			17,721			101,482			2,050			—		199,030				2,778		12,367		60,298		11,557		29,539		109,759		824		13,836		240,958
Classified - substandard			103			136			5,717			10,927			9,991			55,227			—			—		82,101				4,928		3,155		4,690		1,947		16,774		59,171		—		49		90,714
Classified - doubtful			—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—		—				—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Total		$	561,484		$	776,345		$	645,232		$	584,470		$	696,235		$	1,624,952		$	129,383		$	—	$	5,018,101			$	514,415	$	718,301	$	688,506	$	509,568	$	467,200	$	1,834,369	$	64,230	$	37,098	$	4,833,687
Commercial real estate: improved property
Current-period net charge-offs		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	13		$	(1,635	)	$	421		$	—		$	—	$	(1,201	)

Commercial and industrial	Commercial and industrial																											Commercial and industrial
Risk rating:
Pass		$	140,980		$	259,329		$	207,764		$	160,140		$	92,370		$	1,138,827		$	457,987		$	140	$	2,457,537			$	416,053	$	190,262	$	112,982	$	144,588	$	95,428	$	244,890	$	417,565	$	28,981	$	1,650,749
Criticized - compromised			26			2,461			4,273			1,308			459			12,821			5,938			—		27,286				239		350		1,271		3,086		2,437	$	1,163		6,964		7,377		22,887
Classified - substandard			—			3,322			817			3,764			1,368			6,617			6,524			—		22,412				108		239		18,603		1,198		2,205	$	2,433		3,520		5,272		33,578
Classified - doubtful			—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—		—				—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Total		$	141,006		$	265,112		$	212,854		$	165,212		$	94,197		$	1,158,265		$	470,449		$	140	$	2,507,235			$	416,400	$	190,851	$	132,856	$	148,872	$	100,070	$	248,486	$	428,049	$	41,630	$	1,707,214
Commercial and industrial
Current-period net charge-offs		$	—		$	—		$	(1,829	)	$	(159	)	$	(35	)	$	(254	)	$	(200	)	$	—	$	(2,477	)

Residential real estate	Residential real estate																											Residential real estate
Loan delinquency:
Current		$	301,547		$	276,344		$	175,858		$	126,863		$	183,747		$	711,325		$	390		$	—	$	1,776,074			$	381,939	$	341,539	$	146,234	$	77,809	$	67,661	$	591,263	$	—	$	30,496	$	1,636,941
30-59 days past due			—			—			144			—			—			1,678			—			—		1,822				66		—		—		—		—		2,152		—		—		2,218
60-89 days past due			—			412			—			—			217			2,975			—			—		3,604				111		359		—		122		443		2,461		—		—		3,496
90 days or more past due			—			486			784			761			1,117			13,371			—			—		16,519				775		823		976		44		761		9,139		—		56		12,574
Total		$	301,547		$	277,242		$	176,786		$	127,624		$	185,081		$	729,349		$	390		$	—	$	1,798,019			$	382,891	$	342,721	$	147,210	$	77,975	$	68,865	$	605,015	$	—	$	30,552	$	1,655,229
Residential real estate
Current-period net charge-offs		$	—		$	(24	)	$	(8	)	$	(11	)	$	(151	)	$	(128	)	$	—		$	—	$	(322	)

Home equity	Home equity																											Home equity
Loan delinquency:
Current		$	16,471		$	4,047		$	4,255		$	1,606		$	1,051		$	17,581		$	582,500		$	12,514	$	640,025			$	10,630	$	333	$	382	$	254	$	352	$	19,503	$	568,822	$	484	$	600,760
30-59 days past due			—			—			—			—			40			1,300			1,428			238		3,006				13		—		8		21		16		419		2,516		13		3,006
60-89 days past due			—			—			11			66			—			192			77			8		354				—		—		—		14		—		203		-		23		240
90 days or more past due			—			—			34			—			127			1,831			1,046			629		3,667				184		68		102		98		254		2,588		-		435		3,729
Total		$	16,471		$	4,047		$	4,300		$	1,672		$	1,218		$	20,904		$	585,051		$	13,389	$	647,052			$	10,827	$	401	$	492	$	387	$	622	$	22,713	$	571,338	$	955	$	607,735
Home equity
Current-period net charge-offs		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	(2	)	$	—		$	(69	)	$	(367	)	$	—	$	(438	)

Consumer	Consumer																											Consumer
Loan delinquency:
Current		$	61,945		$	100,273		$	45,087		$	26,304		$	15,996		$	52,419		$	23,720		$	181	$	325,925			$	48,921	$	50,231	$	58,442	$	22,730	$	13,163	$	37,234	$	50,686	$	28	$	281,435
30-59 days past due			237			242			117			190		��	58			522			39			—		1,405				396		791		424		225		96		375		221		—		2,528
60-89 days past due			96			216			92			82			42			217			26			—		771				120		134		138		38		11		199		-		—		640
90 days or more past due			58			74			130			25			8			193			3			—		491				59		42		96		27		15		255		4		—		498
Total		$	62,336		$	100,805		$	45,426		$	26,601		$	16,104		$	53,351		$	23,788		$	181	$	328,592			$	49,496	$	51,198	$	59,100	$	23,020	$	13,285	$	38,063	$	50,911	$	28	$	285,101
Consumer
Current-period net charge-offs		$	(78	)	$	(750	)	$	(457	)	$	(410	)	$	(72	)	$	43		$	—		$	—	$	(1,724	)

	Loans As of December 31, 2020
	Amortized Cost Basis by Origination Year
(unaudited, in thousands)	2020		2019		2018		2017		2016		Prior		Revolving Loans Amortized Cost Basis		Revolving Loans Converted to Term		Total
Commercial real estate: land and construction
Risk rating:
Pass	$	133,720	$	314,614	$	109,232	$	27,483	$	16,404	$	29,685	$	26,297	$	—	$	657,435
Criticized - compromised		459		—		1,532		233		79		3,778		1,316		—		7,397
Classified - substandard		—		—		403		58		291		2,693		—		—		3,445
Classified - doubtful		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Total	$	134,179	$	314,614	$	111,167	$	27,774	$	16,774	$	36,156	$	27,613	$	—	$	668,277

Commercial real estate: improved property
Risk rating:
Pass	$	809,516	$	670,554	$	646,629	$	474,622	$	572,733	$	1,346,552	$	89,120	$	—	$	4,609,726
Criticized - compromised		2,693		67,261		16,793		59,251		42,284		130,247		1,772		—		320,301
Classified - substandard		102		16,366		4,946		11,647		18,460		55,567		—		—		107,088
Classified - doubtful		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Total	$	812,311	$	754,181	$	668,368	$	545,520	$	633,477	$	1,532,366	$	90,892	$	—	$	5,037,115

Commercial and industrial
Risk rating:
Pass	$	977,085	$	240,262	$	193,712	$	160,924	$	85,379	$	265,890	$	427,336	$	136	$	2,350,724
Criticized - compromised		453		2,726		4,206		2,795		324		11,640		12,453		—		34,597
Classified - substandard		—		3,817		1,947		3,771		1,603		5,073		5,906		—		22,117
Classified - doubtful		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Total	$	977,538	$	246,805	$	199,865	$	167,490	$	87,306	$	282,603	$	445,695	$	136	$	2,407,438

Residential real estate
Loan delinquency:
Current	$	385,541	$	242,770	$	149,603	$	108,090	$	170,967	$	641,665	$	—	$	—	$	1,698,636
30-59 days past due		—		—		320		533		—		1,761		—		—		2,614
60-89 days past due		—		—		823		—		185		4,646		—		—		5,654
90 days or more past due		—		483		166		761		819		11,828		—		—		14,057
Total	$	385,541	$	243,253	$	150,912	$	109,384	$	171,971	$	659,900	$	—	$	—	$	1,720,961

Home equity
Loan delinquency:
Current	$	18,191	$	3,611	$	3,334	$	975	$	1,110	$	16,477	$	583,486	$	12,135	$	639,319
30-59 days past due		124		—		34		—		—		882		1,247		127		2,414
60-89 days past due		—		—		—		—		—		14		749		12		775
90 days or more past due		—		—		8		156		88		1,786		1,075		766		3,879
Total	$	18,315	$	3,611	$	3,376	$	1,131	$	1,198	$	19,159	$	586,557	$	13,040	$	646,387

Consumer
Loan delinquency:
Current	$	72,847	$	89,637	$	39,584	$	22,118	$	13,144	$	45,735	$	22,253	$	165	$	305,483
30-59 days past due		481		408		210		311		194		379		15		—		1,998
60-89 days past due		273		147		84		100		163		253		11		—		1,031
90 days or more past due		113		72		73		31		12		242		—		—		543
Total	$	73,714	$	90,264	$	39,951	$	22,560	$	13,513	$	46,609	$	22,279	$	165	$	309,055

The following table summarizes other real estate owned and repossessed assets included in other assets:

	September 30,		December 31,		September 30,		December 31,
(unaudited, in thousands)	2020		2019		2021		2020
Other real estate owned	$	730	$	4,062	$	293	$	504
Repossessed assets		8		116		—		45
Total other real estate owned and repossessed assets	$	738	$	4,178	$	293	$	549

Residential real estate included in other real estate owned was $0.2 and $0.1 million at September 30, ~~2020~~2021 and December 31, ~~2019 was $0.3 million and $0.6 million,~~2020, respectively. At September 30, ~~2020~~2021 and December 31, ~~2019,~~2020, formal foreclosure proceedings were in process on residential real estate loans totaling ~~$1.1~~$1.9 million and ~~$8.1~~$1.8 million, respectively. As a result of provisions of the CARES Act, certain residential real estate loans are temporarily suspended from entering foreclosure proceedings. The balance of these loans totaled $3.6 million and $2.3 million at September 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively.

Wesbanco is exposed to certain risks arising from both its business operations and economic conditions. Wesbanco principally manages its exposures to a wide variety of business and operational risks through management of its core business activities. Wesbanco manages economic risks, including interest rate, liquidity, and credit risk, primarily by managing the amount, sources, and duration of its assets and liabilities. Wesbanco’s existing interest rate derivatives result from a service provided to certain qualifying customers and, therefore, are not used to manage interest rate risk in Wesbanco’s assets or liabilities. Wesbanco manages a matched book with respect to its derivative instruments in order to minimize its net risk exposure resulting from such transactions. A matched book is when ~~the Bank’s~~Wesbanco Bank, Inc.’s (the “Bank”) assets and liabilities are equally distributed but also have similar maturities.

Wesbanco executes interest rate swaps with commercial banking customers to facilitate their respective risk management strategies. Those interest rate swaps are simultaneously hedged by offsetting interest rate swaps that Wesbanco executes with a third party, sosuch that Wesbanco minimizes its net risk exposure resulting from such transactions. As the interest rate swaps associated with this program do not meet the strict hedge accounting requirements of ASC 815, changes in the fair value of both the customer swaps and the offsetting third-party swaps are recognized directly in earnings. As of September 30, ~~2020~~2021 and December 31, ~~2019,~~2020, Wesbanco had 99130 and ~~65, respectively,~~112 customer interest rate swaps with an aggregate notional amount of ~~$610.1~~$696.0 million and ~~$399.9~~$649.9 million, respectively, related to this program. ~~During the nine months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively,~~ Wesbanco recognized ~~net losses of $2.8 million and $1.6 million, respectively, related to the changes in fair value of these swaps. Additionally, Wesbanco recognized $7.0 million and $2.1 million of~~ income for the related swap fees of $0.4 million and $0.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively and $3.3 million and $7.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2020~~2021 and ~~2019,~~2020, respectively.

Risk participation agreements are entered into as financial guarantees of performance on interest rate swap derivatives. The purchased asset or sold liability allows Wesbanco to participate-in (fee received) or participate-out (fee paid) the risk associated with certain derivative positions executed by the borrower byof the lead bank in a loan syndication. As of September 30, ~~2020~~2021 and December 31, ~~2019,~~2020, Wesbanco had 1214 and ~~10, respectively,~~12, risk participation-in agreements with an aggregate notional amount of ~~$101.6~~$132.4 million and ~~$96.5~~$101.1 million, respectively. As of September 30, ~~2020~~2021 and December 31, ~~2019,~~2020, Wesbanco had 1 risk participation-out agreement with an aggregate notional amount of ~~$10.0~~$9.9 million and ~~$7.0~~$10.0 million, respectively.

Certain residential mortgage loans are originated for sale in the secondary mortgage loan market. These loans are classified as held for sale and carried at fair value as Wesbanco has elected the fair value option. Fair value is determined based on rates obtained from the secondary market for loans with similar characteristics. Wesbanco sells loans to the secondary market on either a mandatory or best efforts basis. The loans sold on a mandatory basis are not committed to an investor until the loan is closed with the borrower. Wesbanco enters into forward to be announced (“TBA”) contracts to manage the interest rate risk between the loan commitment and the closing of the loan. The total balance of forward TBA contracts entered into was ~~$188.0~~$65.2 million and ~~$50.0~~$183.5 million at September 30, ~~2020~~2021 and December 31, ~~2019,~~2020, respectively. ~~Additionally, Wesbanco recognized losses of $5.5 million and $1.3 million, respectively, for the nine months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019 related to the changes in fair value of these contracts.~~ The loans sold on a best efforts basis are committed to an investor simultaneous to the interest rate commitment with the borrower, and as a result, the Company does not enter into a separate forward TBA contract to offset the fair value risk as the investor accepts such risk in exchange for paying a lower premium on sale.

All derivatives are carried on the consolidated balance sheet at fair value. Derivative assets are classified in the consolidated balance sheet under other assets, and derivative liabilities are classified in the consolidated balance sheet under other liabilities. Changes in fair value are recognized in earnings. None of Wesbanco’s derivatives are designated in a qualifying hedging relationship under ASC 815.

The table below presents the fair value of Wesbanco’s derivative financial instruments as well as their classification on the Balance Sheet as of September 30, ~~2020~~2021 and December 31, ~~2019:~~2020:

	September 30, 2020						December 31, 2019						September 30, 2021						December 31, 2020
(unaudited, in thousands)	Notional or Contractual Amount		Other Asset Derivatives		Other Liability Derivatives		Notional or Contractual Amount		Other Asset Derivatives		Other Liability Derivatives		Notional or Contractual Amount		Asset Derivatives		Liability Derivatives		Notional or Contractual Amount		Asset Derivatives		Liability Derivatives
Derivatives
Loan Swaps:
Interest rate swaps	$	610,062	$	52,837	$	57,201	$	399,860	$	14,585	$	16,117	$	696,029	$	27,121	$	28,513	$	649,857	$	46,418	$	49,917
Other contracts:
Interest rate loan commitments		121,396		1,237		—		34,236		44		—		50,146		24		—		112,119		702		—
Forward TBA contracts		188,000		—		285		50,000		—		88		65,221		201		—		183,500	—			1,161
Total derivatives			$	54,074	$	57,486			$	14,629	$	16,205			$	27,346	$	28,513			$	47,120	$	51,078

The table below presents the change in the fair value of the Company’s derivative financial instruments reflected within non-interest income on the consolidated income statement for the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2020~~2021 and ~~2019,~~2020, respectively.

		For the Three Months Ended September 30,						For the Nine Months Ended September 30,							For the Three Months Ended September 30,						For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
(unaudited, in thousands)	Location of Gain/(Loss)	2020			2019			2020			2019			Location of Gain/(Loss)	2021			2020			2021			2020
Interest rate swaps	Other income	$	420		$	(556	)	$	(2,832	)	$	(1,619	)	Other income	$	378		$	420		$	2,106		$	(2,832	)
Interest rate loan commitments	Mortgage banking income		48			(66	)		1,193			(133	)	Mortgage banking income		(226	)		48			(678	)		1,193
Forward TBA contracts	Mortgage banking income		(1,653	)		(465	)		(5,501	)		(1,317	)	Mortgage banking income		(278	)		(1,653	)		2,621			(5,501	)
Total		$	(1,185	)	$	(1,087	)	$	(7,140	)	$	(3,069	)		$	(126	)	$	(1,185	)	$	4,049		$	(7,140	)

Wesbanco has agreements with its derivative counterparties that contain a provision, which provides that if Wesbanco defaults on any of its indebtedness, including default where repayment of the indebtedness has not been accelerated by the lender, then Wesbanco could also be declared in default on its derivative obligations.

Wesbanco also has agreements with certain of its derivative counterparties that contain a provision where if Wesbanco fails to maintain its status as either a “well” or “adequately-capitalized” institution, then the counterparty could terminate the derivative positions and Wesbanco would be required to settle its obligations under the agreements.

Wesbanco had minimum collateral posting thresholds with certain of its derivative counterparties and ~~had~~has posted collateral with a market value of ~~$89.8~~$58.0 million as of September 30, ~~2020.~~2021. If Wesbanco had breached any of these provisions at September 30, ~~2020,~~2021, it could have been required to settle its obligations under the agreements at the termination value and would have been required to pay any additional amounts due in excess of amounts previously posted as collateral with the respective counterparty.

The following table presents the net periodic pension ~~cost~~income for Wesbanco’s Defined Benefit Pension Plan (the “Plan”) and the related components:

	For the Three Months Ended September 30,						For the Nine Months Ended September 30,						For the Three Months Ended September 30,						For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
(unaudited, in thousands)	2020			2019			2020			2019			2021			2020			2021			2020
Service cost – benefits earned during year	$	574		$	567		$	1,710		$	1,681		$	630		$	574		$	1,869		$	1,710
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation		1,133			1,327			3,375			3,938			861			1,133			2,555			3,375
Expected return on plan assets		(2,622	)		(2,235	)		(7,810	)		(6,633	)		(2,825	)		(2,622	)		(8,382	)		(7,810	)
Amortization of prior service cost		(9	)		7			(27	)		20			(9	)		(9	)		(26	)		(27	)
Amortization of net loss		802			817			2,389			2,424			690			802			2,047			2,389
Net periodic pension (income) cost	$	(122	)	$	483		$	(363	)	$	1,430
Net periodic pension income													$	(653	)	$	(122	)	$	(1,937	)	$	(363	)

The service cost of $1.9 million and $1.7 million for ~~both~~ the nine months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020, ~~and 2019~~respectively, is included in salaries and wages, and the periodic pension income of ~~$2.1~~$3.8 million and ~~$0.3~~$2.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2020~~2021 and ~~2019,~~2020, respectively, is included in employee benefits.

The Plan covers all employees of Wesbanco and its subsidiaries who were hired on or before August 1, 2007 who satisfy minimum age and length of service requirements, and is not available to employees hired after such date.

A minimum required contribution of ~~$5.0~~ $5.2million is due for ~~2020,~~2021, which can be offset in whole or in part by the Plan’s ~~$60.9~~ $64.2million available credit balance. Wesbanco currently does 0t expect to make a voluntary contribution to the Plan in ~~2020.~~2021.

Fair value estimates are based on quoted market prices, if available, quoted market prices of similar assets or liabilities, or the present value of expected future cash flows and other valuation techniques. These valuations are significantly affected by discount rates, cash flow assumptions, and risk assumptions used. Therefore, fair value estimates may not be substantiated by comparison to independent markets and are not intended to reflect the proceeds that may be realizable in an immediate settlement of the instruments.

Fair value is determined at one point in time and is not representative of future value. These amounts do not reflect the total value of a going concern organization. Management does not have the intention to dispose of a significant portion of its assets and liabilities, and therefore the unrealized gains or losses should not be interpreted as a forecast of future earnings and cash flows.

The following is a discussion of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis and valuation techniques applied:

Investment securities: The fair value of investment securities which are measured on a recurring basis are determined primarily by obtaining quoted prices on nationally recognized securities exchanges or matrix pricing, which is a mathematical technique used widely in the industry to value debt securities without relying exclusively on quoted prices for the specific securities but rather by relying on the securities’ relationship to other similar securities. These securities are classified within level 1 or 2 in the fair value hierarchy. Positions that are not traded in active markets for which valuations are generated using assumptions not observable in the market or management’s best estimate are classified within level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. This includes certain specific municipal debt issues for which the credit quality and discount rate must be estimated.

Loans held for sale: Loans held for sale are carried, in aggregate, at fair value as Wesbanco previously elected the fair value option. The use of a valuation model using quoted prices of similar instruments are significant inputs in arriving at the fair value and therefore loans held for sale are classified within level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

Derivatives: Wesbanco enters into interest rate swap agreements with qualifying commercial customers to meet their financing, interest rate and other risk management needs. These agreements provide the customer the ability to convert from variable to fixed interest rates. The credit risk associated with derivatives executed with customers is essentially the same as that involved in extending loans and is subject to normal credit policies and monitoring. Those interest rate swaps are economically hedged by offsetting interest rate swaps that Wesbanco executes with derivative counterparties in order to offset its exposure on the fixed components of the customer interest rate swap agreements. The interest rate swap agreement with the loan customer and with the counterparty is reported at fair value in other assets and other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet with any resulting gain or loss recorded in current period earnings as other income and other expense.

Wesbanco enters into forward TBA contracts to manage the interest rate risk between the loan commitments to the customer and the closing of the loan for loans that will be sold on a mandatory basis to secondary market investors. The forward TBA contract is reported at fair value in other assets and other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet with any resulting gain or loss recorded in current period’s earnings as mortgage banking income.

Wesbanco determines the fair value for derivatives using widely accepted valuation techniques including discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of each derivative. This analysis reflects contractual terms of the derivative, including the period to maturity, and uses observable market-based inputs, including interest rate curves and implied volatilities. Wesbanco incorporates credit valuation adjustments to appropriately reflect both its own non-performance risk and the respective counterparty’s non-performance risk in the fair value measurements.

We may be required from time to time to measure certain assets and liabilities at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in accordance with GAAP. These adjustments to fair value usually result from the application of lower of cost or market accounting or write-downs of individual assets and liabilities.

Individually-evaluated ~~nonperforming~~ loans: Individually-evaluated ~~non-performing~~ loans are carried at the amortized cost basis less the specific allowance calculated ~~with the~~under CECL. ~~Since these~~Individually-evaluated loans ~~are nonperforming, cash flows could not be estimated and thus~~ are calculated using a cost basis approach or collateral value approach.

Other real estate owned and repossessed assets: Other real estate owned and repossessed assets are carried at the lower of the investment in the assets or the fair value of the assets less estimated selling costs. The use of independent appraisals and management’s best judgment are significant inputs in arriving at the fair value measure of the underlying collateral, and therefore other real estate owned and repossessed assets are classified within level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.

The fair value amounts presented in the table below are intended to permit reconciliation of the fair value hierarchy to the amounts presented in the statement of financial position. The following tables set forth Wesbanco’s financial assets and liabilities that were accounted for at fair value on a recurring and nonrecurring basis by level within the fair value hierarchy as of September 30, ~~2020~~2021 and December 31, ~~2019:~~2020:

			September 30, 2020								September 30, 2021
			Fair Value Measurements Using:								Fair Value Measurements Using:
	September 30,		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets		Significant Other Observable Inputs		Significant Unobservable Inputs		September 30,		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets		Significant Other Observable Inputs		Significant Unobservable Inputs
(unaudited, in thousands)	2020		(level 1)		(level 2)		(level 3)		2021		(level 1)		(level 2)		(level 3)
Recurring fair value measurements
Equity securities	$	12,516	$	12,516	$	—	$	—	$	13,451	$	13,451	$	—	$	—
Available-for-sale debt securities
U.S. Treasury		19,992		—		19,992		—		10,000		—		10,000		—
U.S. Government sponsored entities and agencies		192,849		—		192,849		—		233,435		—		233,435		—
Residential mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations of government sponsored entities and agencies		1,421,023		—		1,421,023		—		2,294,456		—		2,294,456		—
Commercial mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations of government sponsored entities and agencies		259,610		—		259,610		—		321,549		—		321,549		—
Obligations of states and political subdivisions		126,539		—		124,891		1,648		109,821		—		108,327		1,494
Corporate debt securities		25,911		—		25,911		—		17,542		—		17,542		—
Total available-for-sale debt securities	$	2,045,924	$	—	$	2,044,276	$	1,648	$	2,986,803	$	—	$	2,985,309	$	1,494
Loans held for sale		134,151		—		134,151		—		32,308		—		32,308		—
Other assets - interest rate derivatives agreements		52,837		—		52,837		—		27,121		—		27,121		—
Total assets recurring fair value measurements	$	2,245,428	$	12,516	$	2,231,264	$	1,648	$	3,059,683	$	13,451	$	3,044,738	$	1,494

Other liabilities - interest rate derivatives agreements	$	57,201	$	—	$	57,201	$	—	$	28,513	$	—	$	28,513	$	—
Total liabilities recurring fair value measurements	$	57,201	$	—	$	57,201	$	—	$	28,513	$	—	$	28,513	$	—

Nonrecurring fair value measurements
Individually-evaluated nonperforming loans	$	1,999	$	—	$	—	$	1,999
Individually-evaluated loans									$	22,316	$	—	$	—	$	22,316
Other real estate owned and repossessed assets		738		—		—		738		293		—		—		293
Total nonrecurring fair value measurements	$	2,737	$	—	$	—	$	2,737	$	22,609	$	—	$	—	$	22,609

			December 31, 2019								December 31, 2020
			Fair Value Measurements Using:								Fair Value Measurements Using:
	December 31,		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets		Significant Other Observable Inputs		Significant Unobservable Inputs		December 31,		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets		Significant Other Observable Inputs		Significant Unobservable Inputs
(in thousands)	2019		(level 1)		(level 2)		(level 3)		2020		(level 1)		(level 2)		(level 3)
Recurring fair value measurements
Equity securities	$	12,343	$	12,343	$	—	$	—	$	13,047	$	13,047	$	—	$	—
Available-for-sale debt securities
U.S. Treasury		32,836		—		32,836		—		39,982		—		39,982		—
U.S. Government sponsored entities and agencies		159,628		—		159,628		—		211,682		—		211,682		—
Residential mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations of government sponsored entities and agencies		1,815,987		—		1,815,987		—		1,264,737		—		1,264,737		—
Commercial mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations of government sponsored entities and agencies		190,409		—		190,409		—		320,098		—		320,098		—
Obligations of states and political subdivisions		145,609		—		144,004		1,605		115,762		—		114,227		1,535
Corporate debt securities		49,089		—		49,089		—		25,875		—		25,875		—
Total available-for-sale debt securities	$	2,393,558	$	—	$	2,391,953	$	1,605	$	1,978,136	$	—	$	1,976,601	$	1,535
Loans held for sale		43,013		—		43,013		—		168,378		—		168,378		—
Other assets - interest rate derivatives agreements		14,585		—		14,585		—		46,418		—		46,418		—
Total assets recurring fair value measurements	$	2,463,499	$	12,343	$	2,449,551	$	1,605	$	2,205,979	$	13,047	$	2,191,397	$	1,535

Other liabilities - interest rate derivatives agreements	$	16,117	$	—	$	16,117	$	—	$	49,917	$	—	$	49,917	$	—
Total liabilities recurring fair value measurements	$	16,117	$	—	$	16,117	$	—	$	49,917	$	—	$	49,917	$	—

Nonrecurring fair value measurements
Impaired loans	$	2,362	$	—	$	—	$	2,362
Individually-evaluated loans									$	1,958	$	—	$	—	$	1,958
Other real estate owned and repossessed assets		4,178		—		—		4,178		549		—		—		549
Total nonrecurring fair value measurements	$	6,540	$	—	$	—	$	6,540	$	2,507	$	—	$	—	$	2,507

Wesbanco’s policy is to recognize transfers between levels as of the actual date of the event or change in circumstances that caused the transfer. There were 0 significant transfers between level 1, 2 or 3 for the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2020~~2021 or for the year ended December 31, ~~2019.~~2020.

The following table presents additional quantitative information about assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis and for which Wesbanco has utilized level 3 inputs to determine fair value:

The estimated fair values of Wesbanco’s financial instruments are summarized below:

					Fair Value Measurements at										Fair Value Measurements at
					September 30, 2020										September 30, 2021
	Carrying		Fair Value		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets		Significant Other Observable Inputs		Significant Unobservable Inputs		Carrying		Fair Value		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets		Significant Other Observable Inputs		Significant Unobservable Inputs
(unaudited, in thousands)	Amount		Estimate		(level 1)		(level 2)		(level 3)		Amount		Estimate		(level 1)		(level 2)		(level 3)
Financial Assets
Cash and due from banks	$	760,266	$	760,266	$	760,266	$	—	$	—	$	1,121,116	$	1,121,116	$	1,121,116	$	—	$	—
Equity securities		12,516		12,516		12,516		—		—		13,451		13,451		13,451		—		—
Available-for-sale debt securities		2,045,924		2,045,924		—		2,044,276		1,648		2,986,803		2,986,803		—		2,985,309		1,494
Held-to-maturity debt securities		746,306		782,401		—		781,906		495
Net held-to-maturity debt securities												953,663		978,494		—		978,060		434
Net loans		10,804,437		10,863,349		—		—		10,863,349		9,776,560		9,563,549		—		—		9,563,549
Loans held for sale		134,151		134,151		—		134,151		—		32,308		32,308		—		32,308		—
Other assets - interest rate derivatives		52,837		52,837		—		52,837		—		27,121		27,121		—		27,121		—
Accrued interest receivable		65,023		65,023		65,023		—		—		61,895		61,895		61,895		—		—

Financial Liabilities
Deposits		12,201,425		12,210,444		10,493,913		1,716,531		—		13,423,314		13,434,258		12,069,062		1,365,196		—
Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings		794,621		803,811		—		803,811		—		208,940		210,881		—		210,881		—
Other borrowings		381,909		380,269		380,269		—		—		152,546		141,471		141,471		—		—
Subordinated debt and junior subordinated debt		192,150		182,753		—		113,496		69,257		167,711		144,341		—		109,186		35,155
Other liabilities - interest rate derivatives		57,201		57,201		—		57,201		—		28,513		28,513		—		28,513		—
Accrued interest payable		5,014		5,014		5,014		—		—		2,495		2,495		2,495		—		—

					Fair Value Measurements at										Fair Value Measurements at
					December 31, 2019										December 31, 2020
	Carrying		Fair Value		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets		Significant Other Observable Inputs		Significant Unobservable Inputs		Carrying		Fair Value		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets		Significant Other Observable Inputs		Significant Unobservable Inputs
(in thousands)	Amount		Estimate		(level 1)		(level 2)		(level 3)		Amount		Estimate		(level 1)		(level 2)		(level 3)
Financial Assets
Cash and due from banks	$	234,796	$	234,796	$	234,796	$	—	$	—	$	905,447	$	905,447	$	905,447	$	—	$	—
Equity securities		12,343		12,343		12,343		—		—		13,047		13,047		13,047		—		—
Available-for-sale debt securities		2,393,558		2,393,558		—		2,391,953		1,605		1,978,136		1,978,136		—		1,976,601		1,535
Held-to-maturity debt securities		851,753		874,523		—		873,995		528
Net held-to-maturity debt securities												730,886		768,183		—		767,720		463
Net loans		10,215,556		10,297,989		—		—		10,297,989		10,603,406		10,802,883		—		—		10,802,883
Loans held for sale		43,013		43,013		—		43,013		—		168,378		168,378		—		168,378		—
Other assets - interest rate derivatives		14,585		14,585		—		14,585		—		46,418		46,418		—		46,418		—
Accrued interest receivable		43,648		43,648		43,648		—		—		66,790		66,790		66,790		—		—

Financial Liabilities
Deposits		11,004,006		10,989,818		8,948,086		2,041,732		—		12,429,373		12,439,981		10,810,863		1,629,118		—
Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings		1,415,615		1,420,302		—		1,420,302		—		549,003		555,375		—		555,375		—
Other borrowings		282,362		282,691		279,345		3,346		—		241,950		235,796		235,796		—		—
Subordinated debt and junior subordinated debt		199,869		188,349		—		122,934		65,415		192,291		174,452		—		105,768		68,684
Other liabilities - interest rate derivatives		16,117		16,117		—		16,117		—		49,917		49,917		—		49,917		—
Accrued interest payable		8,077		8,077		8,077		—		—		4,314		4,314		4,314		—		—

The following methods and assumptions were used to measure the fair value of financial instruments recorded at cost on Wesbanco’s consolidated balance sheets:

Cash and due from banks: The carrying amount for cash and due from banks is a reasonable estimate of fair value.

Held-to-maturity debt securities: Fair values for debt securities held-to-maturity are determined in the same manner as investment securities, which are described above.

Net loans: Fair values for loans are estimated using a discounted cash flow methodology. The discount rates take into account interest rates currently being offered to customers for loans with similar terms, the credit risk associated with the loan and other market factors, including liquidity. Wesbanco believes the discount rates are consistent with transactions occurring in the marketplace for both performing and distressed loan types. The carrying value is net of the allowance for loan losses and other associated premiums and discounts. Due to the significant judgment involved in evaluating credit quality, loans are classified within level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.

Accrued interest receivable: The carrying amount of accrued interest receivable approximates its fair value.

Deposits: The carrying amount is considered a reasonable estimate of fair value for demand, savings and other variable rate deposit accounts. The fair value of fixed maturity certificates of deposit is estimated by a discounted cash flow method using rates currently offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities.

Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings: The fair value of FHLB borrowings is based on rates currently available to Wesbanco for borrowings with similar terms and remaining maturities.

Other borrowings: The carrying amount of federal funds purchased and overnight sweep accounts generally approximate fair value. Other repurchase agreements are based on quoted market prices if available. If market prices are not available, for certain fixed and adjustable rate repurchase agreements, then quoted market prices of similar instruments are used.

Subordinated debt and junior subordinated debt: The fair value of subordinated debt is estimated using discounted cash flow analyses based on the current borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements. Due to the pooled nature of junior subordinated debt owed to unconsolidated subsidiary trusts, which are not actively traded, estimated fair value is based on recent similar transactions of single-issuer trust preferred securities.

Accrued interest payable: The carrying amount of accrued interest payable approximates its fair value.

Off-balance sheet financial instruments: Off-balance sheet financial instruments consist of commitments to extend credit, including letters of credit. Fair values for commitments to extend credit are estimated using the fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements and the present credit standing of the counterparties. The estimated fair value of the commitments to extend credit and letters of credit are insignificant and therefore are not presented in the above tables.

Interest income, net securities gains (losses) and bank-owned life insurance are not in scope of ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. For the revenue streams in scope of ASC 606 - trust fees, service charges on deposits, net securities brokerage revenue, debit card sponsorship income, payment processing fees, electronic banking fees, mortgage banking income and net gain or loss on sale of other real estate owned and other assets – there are no significant judgements related to the amount and timing of revenue recognition.

Trust fees: Fees are earned over a period of time between monthly and annually, per the related fee schedule. The fees are earned ratably over the period for investment, safekeeping and other services performed by Wesbanco. The fees are accrued when earned based on the daily asset value on the last day of the quarter. In most cases, the fees are directly debited from the customer account. WesMark fees consist of investment advisory fees and shareholder service fees and are paid to Wesbanco by the WesMark mutual funds on a monthly basis for Wesbanco’s involvement with the management of the funds.

Service charges on deposits: There are monthly service charges for both commercial and personal banking customers, which are earned over the month per the related fee schedule based on the customers’ deposits. There are also transaction-based fees, which are earned based on specific transactions or customer activity within the customers’ deposit accounts. These are earned at the time the transaction or customer activity occurs. The fees are debited from the customer account.

Net securities brokerage revenue: Commission income is earned based on customer transactions and management of investments. The commission income from customers’ transactions is recognized when the transaction is complete and approved. Annuity commissions are earned based upon the carrier’s commission rate for the annuity product chosen by the investing customer. The commission income from the management of investments over time is earned continuously over a quarterly period.

Debit card sponsorship income: The activity in this revenue stream concluded on March 31, 2021, with the sale of this program to another bank. Debit card sponsorship income iswas earned from Wesbanco’s sponsorship of its customers, which ~~include~~included independent service organizations, processors and other banks into different debit networks. For providing this service, the customers ~~pay~~paid the bank a per transaction fee for each transaction processed through the network. In some cases, customers ~~are~~were also charged annual sponsorship fees and non-compliance fees as applicable. The fees ~~are~~were earned at the time the transaction or customer activity ~~occurs.~~occurred. The fees ~~are~~were either directly debited from the customers' deposit accounts or ~~are~~were billed to the customer.

Payment processing fees: Payment processing fees are earned from the bill payment and electronic funds transfer (“EFT”) services provided under the name FirstNet. The fees are derived from both the individual consumer banking transactions and from businesses or service providers through monthly billing for total transactions occurring. These fees are earned at the time the transaction or customer activity occurs. The fees are debited from the customers’ deposit accounts or charged directly to the business or service provider.

Electronic banking fees: Interchange and ATM fees are earned based on customer and ATM transactions. Revenue is recognized when the transaction is settled.

Mortgage banking income: Income is earned when Wesbanco-originated loans are sold to an investor on the secondary market. The investor bids on the loans. If the price is accepted, Wesbanco delivers the loan documents to the investor. Once received and approved by the investor, revenue is recognized and the loans are derecognized from the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Prior to the loans being sold, they are classified as loans held for sale. Additionally, the changes in the fair value of the loans held for sale, loan commitments and related derivatives are included in mortgage banking income and are slightly offset by any deferred direct origination costs, such as mortgage loan officer commissions.

Net gain or loss on sale of other real estate ~~owned:~~owned and other assets: Net gain or loss on other real estate owned is recorded when ~~other real estate~~the property is sold to a third party and the Bank collects substantially all of the consideration to which ~~Wesbanco~~it is entitled in exchange for the transfer of the property. Net gain or loss on other assets can include, among other things, the sale of fixed assets, the change in fair value of the underlying investments funded by Wesbanco’s Community Development Corporation (“Wesbanco CDC”) and residual income earned from the sale of Wesbanco’s debit card sponsorship program. Gains or losses are recognized upon receipt of consideration and subsequent transfer of the property for fixed asset sales. The change in fair value of Wesbanco CDC investments occurs upon the change in the underlying investments as these are accounted for utilizing the equity method, and as such, are not within the scope of ASC 606. Residual income from the sale of the debit card sponsorship program is recognized over time per the signed agreement between Wesbanco and the buyer.

The following table summarizes the point of revenue recognition and the income recognized for each of the revenue streams for the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2020~~2021 and ~~2019,~~2020, respectively:

	Point of Revenue	For the Three Months Ended September 30,					For the Nine Months Ended September 30,				Point of Revenue	For the Three Months Ended September 30,					For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
(unaudited, in thousands)	Recognition	2020			2019		2020		2019		Recognition	2021		2020			2021		2020
Revenue Streams
Trust fees
Trust account fees	Over time	$	4,225		$	4,265	$	13,271	$	13,529	Over time	$	4,768	$	4,225		$	14,792	$	13,271
WesMark fees	Over time		2,201			2,160		6,309		6,351	Over time		2,521		2,201			7,277		6,309
Total trust fees			6,426			6,425		19,580		19,880			7,289		6,426			22,069		19,580
Service charges on deposits
Commercial banking fees	Over time		576			513		1,748		1,480	Over time		464		576			1,629		1,748
Personal service charges	At a point in time and over time		4,756			6,543		14,524		18,323	At a point in time and over time		5,586		4,756			14,191		14,524
Total service charges on deposits			5,332			7,056		16,272		19,803			6,050		5,332			15,820		16,272
Net securities brokerage revenue
Annuity commissions	At a point in time		1,218			1,204		3,101		4,018	At a point in time		1,169		1,218			3,237		3,101
Equity and debt security trades	At a point in time		27			151		280		356	At a point in time		73		27			206		280
Managed money	Over time		248			153		697		484	Over time		311		248			885		697
Trail commissions	Over time		232			257		709		739	Over time		412		232			990		709
Total net securities brokerage revenue			1,725			1,765		4,787		5,597			1,965		1,725			5,318		4,787

Debit card sponsorship income (1)	At a point in time and over time		751			—		2,102		—	At a point in time and over time		—		751			646		2,102
Payment processing fees (1)	At a point in time and over time		669			709		2,133		2,142	At a point in time and over time		773		669			2,234		2,133
Electronic banking fees	At a point in time		4,780			5,253		13,100		18,299	At a point in time		5,427		4,780			14,853		13,100
Mortgage banking income	At a point in time		8,488			2,588		17,295		5,262	At a point in time		4,563		8,488			16,656		17,295
Net (loss) gain on other real estate owned and other assets	At a point in time		(19	)		158		84		670
Net gain (loss) on other real estate owned and other assets (2)											At a point in time and over time		785		(19	)		4,974		84

The activity in accumulated other comprehensive income for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2020~~2021 and ~~2019~~2020 is as follows:

	Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income/(Loss)⁽¹⁾												Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income/(Loss)⁽¹⁾
(unaudited, in thousands)	Defined Benefit Plans			Unrealized Gains (Losses) on Debt Securities Available-for-Sale			Unrealized Gains on Debt Securities Transferred from Available-for-Sale to Held-to-Maturity			Total			Defined Benefit Plans			Unrealized Gains (Losses) on Debt Securities Available-for-Sale			Unrealized Gains on Debt Securities Transferred from Available-for-Sale to Held-to-Maturity			Total
Balance at December 31, 2020													$	(15,502	)	$	46,861		$	—		$	31,359
Other comprehensive income/(loss) before reclassifications														—			(28,292	)		—			(28,292	)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss)														1,431			(35	)		—			1,396
Period change														1,431			(28,327	)		—			(26,896	)
Balance at September 30, 2021													$	(14,071	)	$	18,534		$	—		$	4,463

Balance at December 31, 2019	$	(17,468	)	$	18,644		$	25		$	1,201		$	(17,468	)	$	18,644		$	25		$	1,201
Other comprehensive income before reclassifications		—			37,340			—			37,340
Other comprehensive income/(loss) before reclassifications													—				37,340		—				37,340
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss)		1,712			(1,940	)		(12	)		(240	)		1,712			(1,940	)		(12	)		(240	)
Period change		1,712			35,400			(12	)		37,100			1,712			35,400			(12	)		37,100
Balance at September 30, 2020	$	(15,756	)	$	54,044		$	13		$	38,301		$	(15,756	)	$	54,044		$	13		$	38,301

Balance at December 31, 2018	$	(16,542	)	$	(21,522	)	$	193		$	(37,871	)
Other comprehensive income before reclassifications		—			46,450			—			46,450
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss)		1,721			(199	)		(179	)		1,343
Period change		1,721			46,251			(179	)		47,793
Balance at September 30, 2019	$	(14,821	)	$	24,729		$	14		$	9,922

The following table provides details about amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income for the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2020~~2021 and ~~2019:~~2020:

Details about Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income/(Loss) Components	For the Three Months Ended September 30,						For the Nine Months Ended September 30,						Affected Line Item in the Statement of Net Income	For the Three Months Ended September 30,						For the Nine Months Ended September 30,						Affected Line Item in the Statement of Comprehensive Income
(unaudited, in thousands)	2020			2019			2020			2019				2021			2020			2021			2020
Debt securities available-for-sale ⁽¹⁾:
Net securities gains reclassified into earnings	$	(45	)	$	(219	)	$	(2,545	)	$	(258	)	Net securities gains (Non-interest income)	$	(12	)	$	(45	)	$	(46	)	$	(2,545	)	Net securities gains (Non-interest income)
Related income tax expense ⁽²⁾		11			50			605			59		Provision for income taxes		3			11			11			605		Provision for income taxes
Net effect on accumulated other comprehensive income for the period		(34	)		(169	)		(1,940	)		(199	)			(9	)		(34	)		(35	)		(1,940	)

Debt securities held-to-maturity ⁽¹⁾:
Amortization of unrealized gain transferred from available-for-sale		(5	)		(88	)		(15	)		(237	)	Interest and dividends on securities (Interest and dividend income)		—			(5	)		—			(15	)	Interest and dividends on securities (Interest and dividend income)
Related income tax expense ⁽²⁾		1			20			3			58		Provision for income taxes		—			1			—			3		Provision for income taxes
Net effect on accumulated other comprehensive income for the period		(4	)		(68	)		(12	)		(179	)			—			(4	)		—			(12	)

Defined benefit plans ⁽³⁾:
Amortization of net loss and prior service costs		746			767			2,246			2,275		Employee benefits (Non-interest expense)		635			746			1,886			2,246		Employee benefits (Non-interest expense)
Related income tax benefit ⁽²⁾		(177	)		(175	)		(534	)		(554	)	Provision for income taxes		(153	)		(177	)		(455	)		(534	)	Provision for income taxes
Net effect on accumulated other comprehensive income for the period		569			592			1,712			1,721				482			569			1,431			1,712
Total reclassifications for the period	$	531		$	355		$	(240	)	$	1,343			$	473		$	531		$	1,396		$	(240	)

Commitments — In the normal course of business, Wesbanco offers off-balance sheet credit arrangements to enable its customers to meet their financing objectives. Those instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the financial statements. Wesbanco’s exposure to credit losses in the event of non-performance by the other parties to the financial instruments for commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit is limited to the contractual amount of those instruments. Wesbanco uses the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as for all other lending. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. The allowance for credit losses associated with commitments was ~~$10.8~~$7.3 million~~as of~~ and $9.5 million at September 30, ~~2020 (calculated under the CECL methodology – see Footnote 5, “Loans~~2021 and ~~the Allowance for Credit Losses”) and $0.9 million at~~ December 31, ~~2019,~~2020, respectively, and is included in other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by banks to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. Those guarantees are primarily issued to support public and private borrowing arrangements, including normal business activities, bond financing and similar transactions. Letters of credit are considered guarantees. The liability associated with letters of credit was $0.1 million and $0.2 million as of September 30, ~~2020~~2021 and December 31, ~~2019.~~2020, respectively.

Contingent obligations to purchase loans funded by other entities include ~~affordable housing plan guarantees,~~ credit card guarantees, loans sold with recourse as well as obligations to the FHLB. ~~Affordable housing plan guarantees are performance guarantees for various building project loans. The guarantee amortizes as the loan balances decrease.~~ Credit card guarantees are credit card balances not owned by Wesbanco, whereby the Bank guarantees the performance of the cardholder.

The following table presents total commitments to extend credit, guarantees and various letters of credit outstanding:

	September 30,		December 31,		September 30,		December 31,
(unaudited, in thousands)	2020		2019		2021		2020
Lines of credit	$	2,512,397	$	2,469,676	$	2,801,461	$	2,510,011
Loans approved but not closed		422,328		504,623		449,869		381,180
Overdraft limits		154,666		149,519
Overdraft coverage						381,243		154,322
Letters of credit		52,070		57,205		29,234		53,788
Contingent obligations and other guarantees		133,069		81,551		117,682		126,984

Contingent Liabilities — Wesbanco recognized $2.6 million of legal settlement costs in the third quarter in which settlement is subject to final court approval. Wesbanco is a party to various legal and administrative proceedings and claims. While any litigation contains an element of uncertainty, management does not believe that a material loss related to such proceedings or claims pending or known to be threatened is reasonably possible.

Wesbanco operates 2 reportable segments: community banking and trust and investment services. Wesbanco’s community banking segment offers services traditionally offered by full-service commercial banks, including commercial demand, individual demand and time deposit accounts, as well as commercial, mortgage and individual installment loans, and certain non-traditional offerings, such as insurance and securities brokerage services. The trust and investment services segment offers trust services as well as various alternative investment products including mutual funds. The market value of assets managed or held in custody by the trust and investment services segment was approximately ~~$4.6~~$5.5 billion and ~~$4.4~~$4.6 billion at September 30, ~~2020~~2021 and ~~2019,~~2020, respectively. These assets are held by Wesbanco in fiduciary or agency capacities for their customers and therefore are not included as assets on Wesbanco’s Consolidated Balance Sheets.

			Trust and							Trust and
	Community		Investment				Community			Investment
(unaudited, in thousands)	Banking		Services		Consolidated		Banking			Services		Consolidated
For The Three Months Ended September 30, 2021
Interest and dividend income							$	121,378		$	—	$	121,378
Interest expense								6,103			—		6,103
Net interest income								115,275			—		115,275
Provision for credit losses								(1,730	)		—		(1,730	)
Net interest income after provision for credit losses								117,005			—		117,005
Non-interest income								25,466			7,289		32,755
Non-interest expense								90,599			4,102		94,701
Income before provision for income taxes								51,872			3,187		55,059
Provision for income taxes								9,982			669		10,651
Net income								41,890			2,518		44,408
Preferred stock dividends								2,531			—		2,531
Net income available to common shareholders							$	39,359		$	2,518	$	41,877

For The Three Months Ended September 30, 2020
Interest and dividend income	$	133,657	$	—	$	133,657	$	133,657		$	—	$	133,657
Interest expense		13,064		—		13,064		13,064			—		13,064
Net interest income		120,593		—		120,593		120,593			—		120,593
Provision for credit losses		16,288		—		16,288		16,288			—		16,288
Net interest income after provision for credit losses		104,305		—		104,305		104,305			—		104,305
Non-interest income		28,186		6,426		34,612		28,186			6,426		34,612
Non-interest expense		86,011		3,932		89,943		86,011			3,932		89,943
Income before provision for income taxes		46,480		2,494		48,974		46,480			2,494		48,974
Provision for income taxes		7,145		524		7,669		7,145			524		7,669
Net income	$	39,335	$	1,970	$	41,305
Net income available to common shareholders							$	39,335		$	1,970	$	41,305

For The Three Months Ended September 30, 2019
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2021
Interest and dividend income	$	117,348	$	—	$	117,348	$	369,760		$	—	$	369,760
Interest expense		21,228		—		21,228		22,153			—		22,153
Net interest income		96,120		—		96,120		347,607			—		347,607
Provision for credit losses		4,121		—		4,121		(50,714	)		—		(50,714	)
Net interest income after provision for credit losses		91,999		—		91,999		398,321			—		398,321
Non-interest income		20,525		6,425		26,950		80,007			22,069		102,076
Non-interest expense		69,068		4,200		73,268		252,428			12,412		264,840
Income before provision for income taxes		43,456		2,225		45,681		225,900			9,657		235,557
Provision for income taxes		7,866		468		8,334		45,417			2,028		47,445
Net income	$	35,590	$	1,757	$	37,347		180,483			7,629		188,112
Preferred stock dividends								7,594			—		7,594
Net income available to common shareholders							$	172,889		$	7,629	$	180,518

For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2020
Interest and dividend income	$	410,799	$	—	$	410,799	$	410,799		$	—	$	410,799
Interest expense		51,031		—		51,031		51,031			—		51,031
Net interest income		359,768		—		359,768		359,768			—		359,768
Provision for credit losses		107,949		—		107,949		107,949			—		107,949
Net interest income after provision for credit losses		251,819		—		251,819		251,819			—		251,819
Non-interest income		75,901		19,580		95,481		75,901			19,580		95,481
Non-interest expense		254,517		12,262		266,779		254,517			12,262		266,779
Income before provision for income taxes		73,203		7,318		80,521		73,203			7,318		80,521
Provision for income taxes		9,795		1,537		11,332		9,795			1,537		11,332
Net income	$	63,408	$	5,781	$	69,189

For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019
Interest and dividend income	$	355,944	$	—	$	355,944
Interest expense		63,003		—		63,003
Net interest income		292,941		—		292,941
Provision for credit losses		9,375		—		9,375
Net interest income after provision for credit losses		283,566		—		283,566
Non-interest income		65,998		19,880		85,878
Non-interest expense		207,299		12,353		219,652
Income before provision for income taxes		142,265		7,527		149,792
Provision for income taxes		25,714		1,581		27,295
Net income	$	116,551	$	5,946	$	122,497
Net income available to common shareholders							$	63,408		$	5,781	$	69,189

Total non-fiduciary assets of the trust and investment services segment were ~~$4.2~~$3.9 million (including ~~$2.3~~$1.5 million of trust customer intangibles) and ~~$4.0~~$4.2 million (including ~~$2.5~~$1.9 million of trust customer intangibles) at September 30, ~~2020~~2021 and ~~2019,~~2020, respectively. All other assets, including goodwill and the remainder of other intangible assets, were allocated to the Community Banking segment.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Management’s Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”) represents an overview of the results of operations and financial condition of Wesbanco for the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2020.~~2021. This discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto.

Forward-looking statements in this report relating to Wesbanco’s plans, strategies, objectives, expectations, intentions and adequacy of resources, are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The information contained in this report should be read in conjunction with Wesbanco’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2019~~2020 and documents subsequently filed by Wesbanco with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), including Wesbanco’s Form 10-Q for the quarters ended March 31, 2021 and June 30, ~~2020,~~2021, which are available at the SEC’s website, www.sec.gov or at Wesbanco’s website, www.Wesbanco.com. Investors are cautioned that forward-looking statements, which are not historical fact, involve risks and uncertainties, including those detailed in Wesbanco’s most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC under “Risk Factors” in Part I, Item ~~1A and under “Risk Factors” in Part II, Item 1A of Wesbanco’s March 31 and June 30, 2020 Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.~~1A. Such statements are subject to important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contemplated by such statements, including, without limitation, the effects of changing regional and national economic conditions including the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic; changes in interest rates, spreads on earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, and associated interest rate sensitivity; sources of liquidity available to Wesbanco and its related subsidiary operations; potential future credit losses and the credit risk of commercial, real estate, and consumer loan customers and their borrowing activities; actions of the Federal Reserve Board, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the SEC, the Financial Institution Regulatory Authority, the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board, the Securities Investors Protection Corporation, and other regulatory bodies; potential legislative and federal and state regulatory actions and reform, including, without limitation, the impact of the implementation of the Dodd-Frank Act; adverse decisions of federal and state courts; fraud, scams and schemes of third parties; cyber-security breaches; competitive conditions in the financial services industry; rapidly changing technology affecting financial services; marketability of debt instruments and corresponding impact on fair value adjustments; and/or other external developments materially impacting Wesbanco’s operational and financial performance. Wesbanco does not assume any duty to update forward-looking statements.

Wesbanco is a multi-state bank holding company operating through ~~235~~206 branches and ~~227~~203 ATM machines in West Virginia, Ohio, western Pennsylvania, Kentucky, southern Indiana and Maryland, offering retail banking, corporate banking, personal and corporate trust services, brokerage services, mortgage banking and insurance. Wesbanco’s businesses are significantly impacted by economic factors such as market interest rates, federal monetary and regulatory policies, local and regional economic conditions and the competitive environment’s effect upon Wesbanco’s business volumes. Wesbanco’s deposit levels are affected by numerous factors including personal savings rates, personal income, and competitive rates on alternative investments, as well as competition from other financial institutions within the markets we serve and liquidity needs of Wesbanco. Loan levels are also subject to various factors including construction demand, business financing needs, consumer spending and interest rates, as well as loan terms offered by competing lenders.

Wesbanco’s critical accounting policies involving the significant judgments and assumptions used in the preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements as of September 30, ~~2020~~2021 have remained unchanged ~~except as noted below,~~ from the disclosures presented in Wesbanco’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2019~~2020 within the section “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”

~~Allowance for Credit Losses—~~In September 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, “Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326),” which require entities to use a new forward-looking “expected loss” model also referred to as the current expected credit loss model (“CECL”) on trade and other receivables, held-to-maturity debt securities, loans and other instruments that generally will result in the earlier recognition of allowances for credit losses. For available-for-sale debt securities with unrealized losses, entities measure credit losses in a manner similarly to current procedures, except that the losses will be recognized as allowances rather than reductions in the amortized cost of the securities. Entities will have to disclose significantly more information, including information they use to track credit quality by year of origination for most financing receivables. In April 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-04, “Codification Improvements to Topic 326, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses, Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging and Topic 825, Financial Instruments” and in May 2019 the FASB issued ASU 2019-05, “Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326), Targeted Transition Relief. Public business entities must apply the new requirements for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years, which for Wesbanco was effective January 1, 2020. In December 2018, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) and the Office of Comptroller of the Currency (“OCC”) approved a final rule to address changes to credit loss accounting under GAAP, including banking organizations’ adoption of the CECL methodology. The final rule provides banking organizations the option to phase-in, over a three-year period, the day-one adverse effects on regulatory capital that may result from the adoption of the new accounting standard. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the joint federal bank regulatory agencies issued an optional extension of the regulatory capital transition, which allows for a two-year delay and then a three-year transition period from January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2024. Under the interim final rule, the amount of adjustments to regulatory capital deferred until the phase-in period includes both the initial impact of our adoption of CECL at January 1, 2020 and 25% of subsequent changes in our allowance for credit losses during each quarter of the two-year period ended December 31, 2021, (collectively, the “CECL regulatory capital transition adjustment”). Wesbanco has elected to defer the impact of CECL on its regulatory capital for two years and then will phase-in the impact of the adoption of this standard on the regulatory capital calculations over the subsequent three-year period.

Under CECL, acquired loans or pools of loans that have experienced more-than-insignificant credit deterioration are deemed to be purchased credit-deteriorated (“PCD”) loans, and are grossed-up on day 1 by the initial credit estimate through the allowance as opposed to a reduction in the loan’s amortized cost. The credit mark on acquired loans deemed not to be PCD loans are reflected as a reduction in the loan’s amortized cost, with an allowance and corresponding provision for credit losses recorded in the first reporting period after acquisition through current period earnings, while the loan mark will accrete through interest income over the life of such loans. At acquisition, Wesbanco will consider several factors as indicators that an acquired loan or pool of loans has experienced more-than-insignificant credit deterioration. These factors may include loans 30 days or more past due, loans with an internal risk grade of below average or lower, loans classified as non-accrual by the acquired institution, materiality of the credit and loans that have been previously modified in a troubled debt restructuring (“TDR”). Upon adoption of this standard, acquired loans from prior acquisitions that meet the guidelines under ASC 310-30 (formerly known as “purchased credit-impaired”) were reclassified as PCD loans. The accretable portion of the loan mark as of adoption date continues to accrete into interest income. However, the non-accretable portion of the loan mark was added to the allowance upon adoption, and any reversals of such mark will flow through the allowance in future periods. The loan mark on ASC 310-20 loans (“non-purchased credit-impaired”) from prior acquisitions continues to accrete through interest income over the life of such loans.

Wesbanco formed a cross-functional team in 2016 to oversee the implementation of CECL. The team was responsible for completing an initial data gap assessment, determining if additional data was needed or current data could be improved upon, finalizing the loan segmentation procedures, analyzing the methodology options regarding the calculation of expected credit losses and concluding why the selected methodology is reasonable and in-line with accounting guidance. Wesbanco completed parallel runs in 2019 to ensure the various forecasting and modeling assumptions were reasonable and supportable, including certain qualitative factors that were developed to estimate the initial current expected credit loss allowance. Wesbanco engaged a third-party to validate the data inputs and the models utilized in the CECL calculation. In addition, the Company prepared documentation of the accounting policy decisions, changes to the business processes and procedures, and the control environment under the adoption of this standard. The day 1 impact on the allowance for credit losses was $41.4 million, which included a $6.7 million adjustment for PCD loans and a $3.0 million adjustment related to loan commitments. The after-tax effect on retained earnings was $26.6 million as of January 1, 2020. The day 1 CECL calculation was derived from the selected assumption of a one-year reasonable and supportable forecast, which was obtained from a third-party vendor. After the forecast period, Wesbanco reverts back over a one year period to historical loss rates adjusting for prepayments and curtailments, to estimate losses over the remaining life of loans. The most sensitive assumptions include the length of the forecast and reversion periods, forecast of unemployment and interest rate spreads and prepayment speeds. See Note 5, “Loans and Allowance for Credit Losses” for further detail.

The allowance for credit losses reduces the loan portfolio to the net amount expected to be collected and establishes an allowance for unfunded loan commitments, which is recorded in other liabilities. The allowance for credit losses represents the lifetime expected losses for all loans and unfunded loan commitments at the initial recognition date. The allowance incorporates forward-looking information and applies a reversion methodology beyond the reasonable and supportable forecast. The allowance is increased by a provision charged to operating expense and reduced by charge-offs, net of recoveries. The provision also includes any necessary adjustments to the reserve for unfunded loan commitments, and such reserve is accounted for in other liabilities. Management evaluates the appropriateness of the allowance at least quarterly. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires material estimates that may be susceptible to significant change from period to period.

The allowance for credit loss calculation is based on the loan’s amortized cost basis, which is comprised of the unpaid principal balance of the loan, deferred loan fees (costs) and acquired premium (discount) minus any write-downs. Wesbanco made an accounting policy election to exclude accrued interest from the measurement of the allowance for credit losses, except for recent loan modifications allowed under the CARES Act due to the timing and nature of these modifications, because the Company has a robust policy in place to reverse or write-off accrued interest when the loan is placed on non-accrual, and also made an accounting policy election to reverse accrued interest deemed uncollectible as a reversal of interest income. However, Wesbanco is reserving, as part of the allowance for credit losses, for accrued interest on loan modifications under the CARES Act due to the nature and timing of these deferrals.

The allowance for credit loss reflects the risk of loss in the loan portfolio. To appropriately measure expected credit losses, management disaggregates the loan portfolio into pools of similar risk characteristics. The Company utilizes the probability of default, PD, / loss given default, LGD, approach to calculate the expected loss for each segment, which is then discounted to net present value. PD is the probability the asset will default within a given timeframe and LGD is the percentage of the assets not expected to be collected due to default. The primary macroeconomic drivers of the quantitative model include forecasts of national unemployment and interest rate spreads. Management relies on macroeconomic forecasts obtained from various reputable sources, which may include the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) forecast and other third party forecasts from well recognized, leading economists. These forecasts can range from one to two years, depending upon the facts and circumstances of the current state of the economy, portfolio segment and management’s judgement of what can be reasonably supported. The model reversion period may range from one to three years.

The allowance for credit losses is calculated over the loan’s contractual life. For term loans, the contractual life is calculated based on the maturity date. For commercial and industrial (“C&I”) revolving loans with no stated maturity date, the contractual life is calculated based on the internal review date. For all other revolving loans, the contractual life is based on either the estimated maturity date or a default date. The contractual term does not include any expected extensions, renewals or modifications unless management has a reasonable expectation as of the reporting period that Wesbanco will execute a troubled debt restructuring, TDR, with the borrower. Management assumes a loan will become a TDR if a loan has matured, has a principal balance, and has previously been partially charged-off. This assumption extends the maturity of these loans to six months beyond their respective maturity dates.

The evaluation also considers qualitative factors such as economic trends and conditions, which includes levels of regional unemployment, real estate values and the impact on specific industries and geographical markets, changes in lending policies and underwriting standards, delinquency and other credit quality trends, risk grading imprecision, concentrations of credit risk, if any, volume of activity, changes in lending staff, type of collateral and the results of internal loan reviews and examinations by bank regulatory agencies. Management relies on observable data from internal and external sources to the extent it is available to evaluate each of these factors and adjusts the actual historical loss rates to reflect the impact these factors may have on probable losses in the portfolio.

Commercial loans, including commercial real estate (“CRE”) and C&I, are individually-evaluated if they have unique characteristics, reported as TDRs, or reported as non-accrual loans and greater than $1 million in balance. Specific reserves are established when appropriate for such loans based on the net present value of expected future cash flows of the loan or the estimated realizable value of the collateral, if any.

On March 27, 2020, the CARES Act was signed into law. Section 4013 of the CARES Act, “Temporary Relief From Troubled Debt Restructurings,” allows financial institutions the option to temporarily suspend certain requirements under U.S. GAAP related to TDRs for a limited period of time during the COVID-19 pandemic. On April 7, 2020, the joint federal regulatory agencies issued a statement, “Interagency Statement on Loan Modifications and Reporting for Financial Institutions Working With Customers Affected by the Coronavirus (Revised),” which further discusses loan modifications related to COVID-19. Wesbanco has extended loan principal and/or interest payments up to 180 days for customers affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. These customers must meet certain criteria, such as being in good standing and not more than 30 days past due either as of December 31, 2019, or as of the implementation of the modification program under the Interagency Statement, as well as other requirements noted in the regulatory agencies’ revised statement. Based on the CARES Act provision and the guidance noted above, Wesbanco does not classify the COVID-19 loan modifications as TDRs, nor are the customers considered late with regard to their delayed payments to the extent they meet the criteria. Upon exiting the loan modification deferral program, the measurement of loan delinquency will resume where it was determined upon entry into the program.

In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, Wesbanco launched a number of initiatives and precautionary measures intended to mitigate the impact of the COVID-19 virus outbreak by offering payment relief to affected borrowers through loan modifications, payment deferrals, and working capital facilities; adjusting branch operations to help protect the health and safety of our customers and employees while maintaining access to our services; and supporting local non-profit organizations through our grant programs. Through September 30, 2020, we have assisted our residential mortgage customers with approximately 550 loan modifications, our consumer and home equity loan customers with approximately 720 loan modifications, and our commercial and business customers with approximately 2,300 loan modifications, including most customers in our hotel loan portfolio. In addition, we have been an active participant in the Small Business Administration’s Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”), as established by the CARES Act. As of September 30, 2020, Wesbanco has originated approximately 7,200 PPP loans for $853 million.

Net income available to common shareholders for the three months ended September 30, ~~2020~~2021 was ~~$41.3~~$41.9 million, with diluted earnings per share of ~~$0.61,~~$0.64, compared to ~~$37.3~~$41.3 million or ~~$0.68~~$0.61 per diluted share, respectively, for the third quarter of ~~2019.~~2020. Net income for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2020~~2021, was $180.5 million, with diluted earnings per share of $2.71, compared to $69.2 million or $1.03 per diluted share, ~~as compared to $122.5 million, or $2.24 per diluted share,~~respectively, for the ~~2019 period.~~first nine months of 2020. Excluding after-tax restructuring and merger-related expenses (non-GAAP measure) in both periods, for the three months ended September 30, ~~2020,~~2021, net income available to common shareholders was ~~$44.2~~$45.4 million or ~~$0.66~~$0.70 per diluted share, as compared to ~~$38.7~~$44.2 million or ~~$0.71~~$0.66 per diluted share, respectively, in the prior year quarter; and net income for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2020~~2021 was $185.7 million or $2.79 per diluted share compared to $76.5 million or $1.14 per diluted share ~~compared to $126.3 million or $2.31 per diluted share, respectively,~~ in the prior year period.

	For The Three Months Ended September 30,												For the Nine Months Ended September 30,												For the Three Months Ended September 30,												For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2020						2019						2020						2019						2021						2020						2021						2020
(unaudited, dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)	Net Income			Diluted Earnings Per Share			Net Income			Diluted Earnings Per Share			Net Income			Diluted Earnings Per Share			Net Income			Diluted Earnings Per Share			Net Income			Diluted Earnings Per Share			Net Income			Diluted Earnings Per Share			Net Income			Diluted Earnings Per Share			Net Income			Diluted Earnings Per Share
Net income (Non-GAAP)⁽¹⁾	$	44,155		$	0.66		$	38,681		$	0.71		$	76,489		$	1.14		$	126,349		$	2.31
Net income available to common shareholders (Non-GAAP)⁽¹⁾																									$	45,406		$	0.70		$	44,155		$	0.66		$	185,685		$	2.79		$	76,489		$	1.14
Less: After-tax restructuring and merger-related expenses		(2,850	)		(0.05	)		(1,334	)		(0.03	)		(7,300	)		(0.11	)		(3,852	)		(0.07	)		(3,529	)		(0.06	)		(2,850	)		(0.05	)		(5,167	)		(0.08	)		(7,300	)		(0.11	)
Net income (GAAP)	$	41,305		$	0.61		$	37,347		$	0.68		$	69,189		$	1.03		$	122,497		$	2.24
Net income available to common shareholders (GAAP)																									$	41,877		$	0.64		$	41,305		$	0.61		$	180,518		$	2.71		$	69,189		$	1.03

Net interest income ~~increased $24.5~~decreased $5.3 million or ~~25.5%~~4.4% in the third quarter of ~~2020~~2021 compared to the same quarter of ~~2019~~2020, reflecting lower loan yields, due to ~~a 34.8% increase~~repricing of existing loans and new lower rates offered in ~~average total earning assets, due primarily to~~ the ~~OLBK acquisition and~~current market environment, lower purchase accounting related accretion ~~from purchase accounting.~~and lower rates on investment securities, partially offset by lower interest on deposits and borrowings. As a result of ~~five federal funds rate decreases totaling 225~~the lower rates and a higher mix of securities versus loans to total assets, the net interest margin decreased by 23 basis points ~~from July 2019~~ to ~~March 2020 and aggressive deposit rate reductions late~~3.08% in the ~~first~~third quarter of ~~2020,~~2021 as compared to the third quarter of 2020. Over the same time period, the yield on earning assets decreased a total of 6842 basis points and the cost of interest bearing liabilities decreased 5628 basis ~~points~~points. Average loan balances decreased by 8.5% from ~~the third~~

~~quarter of 2019 to the same period of 2020. This resulted in the net interest margin decreasing by 25 basis points to 3.31% in~~ the third quarter of 2020, ~~compared to 3.56% in the third quarter of 2019. Average loan balances increased by 43.3% from the third quarter of 2019,~~ mainly attributable to ~~both the OLBK acquisition~~forgiveness of SBA Payroll Protection Program (“PPP”) loans and ~~participation in the PPP~~higher levels of commercial real estate loan ~~program,~~payoffs, while average ~~deposits~~securities increased ~~40.3%~~by 41.7% over the same time ~~period.~~ period due to excess liquidity on the balance sheet from stimulus funds received by our customers. Average deposits, excluding certificates of deposit, increased 15.3% over the same time period, due mostly to stimulus deposits and increased personal savings. Accretion from acquisitions benefited the third quarter 2021 net interest margin by 1810 basis points, as compared to 1318 basis points in the prior year ~~period and 19 basis points during the second quarter of 2020.~~period. Lastly, the ~~funding of~~accretion on both existing and forgiven PPP loans positively impacted the third quarter ~~2020~~2021 net interest margin by a net 14 basis points as compared to two basis ~~points.~~points for the third quarter of 2020.

~~The~~Improved macroeconomic forecasts and certain qualitative factors utilized in the CECL calculation drove a net benefit of provision for credit losses ~~increased~~and resulted in a negative provision of $1.7 million in the third quarter of 2021 as compared to a provision of $16.3 million in the third quarter of ~~2020 as compared to the third quarter of 2019, due specifically to the implementation of the CECL accounting standard on January 1, 2020, and the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic. Net~~2020. Annualized net charge-offs as a percentage of average portfolio loans, were ~~0.00%~~0.03% and ~~0.04%~~0.00% for the third quarter of ~~2020~~2021 and ~~2019,~~2020, respectively.

For the third quarter of ~~2020,~~2021, non-interest income ~~increased $7.7~~decreased $1.9 million or ~~28.4%~~5.4% compared to the third quarter of ~~2019,~~2020, driven primarily by lower mortgage banking income, ~~and higher commercial customer loan swap-related income, as well as the OLBK acquisition. Reflecting the low interest rate environment and organic growth, mortgage banking income increased $5.9~~which decreased $3.9 million or ~~228.0%~~46.2% from the record level recorded in the prior year amount. While mortgage loan originations remained solid during the quarter, the amount sold in the secondary market decreased from approximately 75% last year to approximately 40% in the third quarter of ~~2020 compared~~2021, due to a continued effort to keep more 1-to-4 family residential mortgages on the ~~prior year period, as residential mortgage origination dollar volume doubled with the associated sale of approximately 75% of those originations into the secondary market. Loan swap-related income~~balance sheet. Trust fees increased ~~$1.7~~$0.9 million or ~~437.5%~~13.4% from the third quarter of ~~2019~~2020 to ~~$1.3 million,~~the third quarter of 2021 due to ~~commercial loan customer demand in the current rate environment. Offsetting these increases somewhat, electronic~~market improvements and net organic growth. Electronic banking fees ~~decreased $0.5~~increased $0.6 million or ~~9.0%~~13.5% from last year’s third quarter as we transitioned to adjusted settlement processes of a new third-party digital banking service provider. Other income decreased $1.0 million or 19.4% due to lower loan swap-related income and the ~~limitation on interchange fees due to~~sale of the Durbin amendment in the 2010 Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, and service charges on deposits decreased $1.7 million or 24.4% due to higher customer deposits associated with CARES Act stimulus payments and lower general consumer spending.debit card sponsorship business earlier this year.

Non-interest expense, excluding restructuring and merger-related expenses in both periods, increased in the third quarter of ~~2020~~2021 by ~~$14.8~~$3.9 million or ~~20.6%~~4.5%, to $90.2 million, compared to the third quarter of ~~2019.~~2020. This year-over-year increase is primarily due to $2.6 million of settlement costs from the pending resolution of a lawsuit, which are located within other operating expenses, and higher salaries expense. Salaries and wages ~~employee benefits, net occupancy, equipment, and other operating costs associated with additional staffing and financial center locations~~increased $1.2 million or 3.0% from ~~the OLBK acquisition. In addition, salaries and wages reflect the annual mid-year merit increases implemented during the summer.~~ ~~For~~ the third quarter of 2020 ~~restructuring~~to the third quarter of 2021 due to higher incentive compensation expense of $1.8 million, reflecting increased business growth and ~~merger-related expenses were $3.6 million, which related to Wesbanco’s previously announced~~ financial ~~center optimization strategy and the OLBK merger,~~performance as compared to ~~$1.7 million~~the pandemic-impacted prior year. Equipment and software expense for the third quarter of ~~2019, which were related~~2021 increased $1.4 million or 22.2% year-over-year, due to increased asset size, increased usage of digital banking services and SBA PPP loan forgiveness. Offsetting these increases somewhat was a decrease in FDIC insurance expense of $0.7 million or 37.0% due to improved risk factors reducing the ~~OLBK merger.~~assessment rate.

During the third quarter of 2021, the effective tax rate was ~~15.7%~~19.3% as compared to ~~18.2%~~15.7% in last ~~year,~~year’s third quarter, and the provision for income taxes ~~decreased $0.7~~increased by $3.0 million ~~to $7.7 million,~~over the same time period, primarily due to ~~lower year-over-year~~higher pre-tax ~~income.~~

~~In response~~income heavily influenced by the negative provision for credit losses in the third quarter of 2021 as compared to the ~~current economic environment as~~prior year’s reduced pre-tax income from a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, Wesbanco completed an interim goodwill impairment analysis as of September 30, 2020. Wesbanco concluded that goodwill, which has a carrying value of $1.1 billion, was not impaired as of September 30, 2020. Wesbanco will conduct its annual goodwill impairment test in the fourth quarter as of November 30^th.pandemic-induced higher provision for credit losses.

	For the Three Months Ended September 30,						For the Nine Months Ended September 30,						For the Three Months Ended September 30,						For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
(unaudited, dollars in thousands)	2020			2019			2020			2019			2021			2020			2021			2020
Net interest income	$	120,593		$	96,120		$	359,768		$	292,941		$	115,275		$	120,593		$	347,607		$	359,768
Taxable equivalent adjustment to net interest income		1,112			1,265			3,440			4,105			1,080			1,112			3,170			3,440
Net interest income, fully taxable equivalent	$	121,705		$	97,385		$	363,208		$	297,046		$	116,355		$	121,705		$	350,777		$	363,208
Net interest spread, non-taxable equivalent		3.10	%		3.20	%		3.14	%		3.29	%		2.96	%		3.10	%		3.02	%		3.14	%
Benefit of net non-interest bearing liabilities		0.18	%		0.31	%		0.21	%		0.30	%		0.09	%		0.18	%		0.11	%		0.21	%
Net interest margin		3.28	%		3.51	%		3.35	%		3.59	%		3.05	%		3.28	%		3.13	%		3.35	%
Taxable equivalent adjustment		0.03	%		0.05	%		0.03	%		0.05	%		0.03	%		0.03	%		0.03	%		0.03	%
Net interest margin, fully taxable equivalent		3.31	%		3.56	%		3.38	%		3.64	%		3.08	%		3.31	%		3.16	%		3.38	%

Net interest income, which is Wesbanco’s largest source of revenue, is the difference between interest income on earning assets, primarily loans and securities, and interest expense on liabilities, primarily deposits and short and long-term borrowings. Net interest income is affected by the general level of, and changes in interest rates, the steepness and shape of the yield curve, changes in the amount and composition of interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities, as well as the frequency of repricing of existing assets and liabilities. Net interest income ~~increased $24.5~~decreased $5.3 million or ~~25.5%~~4.4% in the third quarter of ~~2020~~2021 compared to the third quarter of ~~2019,~~2020, due to a ~~34.8%~~23 basis point decrease in the net interest margin to 3.08% resulting from the lower yield environment, as the yield on earning assets decreased at a faster rate than the rate on interest bearing liabilities. For the nine months ended September 30, 2021, net interest income decreased by $12.2 million or 3.4% compared to the first nine months of 2020 for similar reasons. The net interest margin decrease was slightly mitigated by a 2.3% increase in average earning asset balances primarily driven by the acquisition of OLBK, which closed midway through the fourth quarter of 2019, and Wesbanco’s participation in the PPP lending program. For the first nine months of 2020, net interest income increased $66.8 million or 22.8% from ~~the first nine months of 2019, for the same reasons. Average loan balances increased 43.3% in~~ the third quarter of 2020, primarily from a 41.7% increase in average securities, which were purchased with liquidity from stimulus-related deposits. Also helping to mitigate the ~~acquisition of OLBK and from $853.1 million of PPP loans originated primarily in the second quarter of 2020, compared to the third quarter of 2019.~~margin decrease, PPP loans contributed a total of ~~$7.8~~$8.2 million in interest and fee accretion income in the third quarter of ~~2020, and $11.5 million for~~2021. This PPP loan income positively impacted the ~~first nine months of 2020.~~third quarter 2021 net interest margin by a net 14 basis points. Excluding ~~the OLBK acquisition and~~ PPP loans, portfolio loans decreased by ~~0.3%~~4.9% from September 30, ~~2019, as growth remained generally flat from a relative lack of~~2020, due to lower new loan demand ~~other than residential lending, most~~and high levels of ~~which was sold in the secondary market. Total average deposits increased~~commercial real estate loan payoffs. In addition, purchase accounting accretion decreased in the third quarter of 2020 by $3.5 billion or 40.3% compared to the third quarter of 2019, due to the deposits acquired from OLBK and from an influx of deposits from the stimulus package associated with the CARES Act, PPP loan proceeds deposited into customer accounts, higher personal savings rates and lower general consumer spending. The net interest margin decreased by 25 basis points to 3.31% in the third quarter of 2020 from the same quarter of 2019. The margin’s decline was due to multiple decreases during late 2019 and the first quarter of 2020 in the Federal Reserve’s target federal funds rate, a flat to sometimes inverted yield curve and additional balance sheet liquidity over the last three quarters, and was partially offset by higher

~~purchase accounting accretion. Approximately 18~~2021, as approximately 10 basis points of accretion from ~~OLBK and other~~ prior acquisitions was included in the third quarter ~~2020~~2021 net interest margin as compared to 1318 basis points in the ~~2019~~2020 third quarter net interest margin. ~~The funding~~Total average deposits, excluding CDs, increased in the third quarter of ~~the previously mentioned PPP loans positively impacted~~2021 by $1.6 billion or 15.3% compared to the third quarter of 2020, ~~net interest margin by a net two basis points. Yields decreased for most earning asset categories in 2020.~~due to stimulus deposits and higher personal savings balances. The cost of interest bearing deposits decreased by 4512 basis points and total liabilities decreased by 5628 basis points from the third quarter of ~~2019~~2020 to the third quarter of ~~2020.~~2021. The decrease in the cost is primarily due to aggressive rate decreases for interest bearing demand deposits, which include public funds, and lower rates for certificates of deposit, customer repurchase agreements, ~~short to medium-term~~term Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings and junior subordinated debentures, in response to the general decrease in overall borrowing rates in the marketplace resulting from lower rates across the yield curve. In addition, the average balance of FHLB borrowings decreased by $717.3 million or 71.3% from the third quarter of 2020, as excess liquidity was used to pay off these borrowings as they matured.

Interest income ~~increased $16.3~~decreased $12.3 million or ~~13.9%~~9.2% in the third quarter of ~~2020~~2021 and ~~$54.9~~$41.0 million or ~~15.4%~~10.0% in the first nine months of ~~2020~~2021 compared to the same periods of ~~2019~~2020 due to ~~higher overall earning assets, mostly attributable to the OLBK acquisition and PPP loan originations, partially offset by~~ lower yields in ~~almost~~ every major earning asset category. Earning asset yields were influenced negatively in the third quarter of ~~2020~~2021 compared to the third quarter of ~~2019~~2020 due primarily to decreases in the Federal Reserve’s ~~drop of the~~ federal funds rate by 150 basis points in ~~March~~ 2020 ~~in addition to~~and the ~~75 basis points that occurred in~~continuation of the ~~last half of 2019.~~low rate environment through the current period. Average loan balances ~~increased $3.4 billion~~decreased $942.8 million or 8.5% in the third quarter of ~~2020~~2021 compared to the third quarter of ~~2019,~~2020, due ~~primarily~~mostly to ~~the acquisition of OLBK and originations~~forgiveness of PPP ~~loans.~~loans that were originated in 2020 and the first half of 2021. Loan yields decreased by 7114 basis points during this same period to ~~4.17% from~~4.03% due to the previously mentioned ~~federal funds~~lower rate ~~decreases~~environment and its effect on the repricing of portfolio loans, as well as lower ~~yields~~offered rates on ~~PPP~~new loans. Loans provide the greatest impact on interest income and the yield on earning assets as they have the largest balance and the highest yield within major earning asset categories. In the third quarter of ~~2020,~~2021, average loans represented ~~75.8%~~67.8% of average earning assets, ~~an increase~~a decrease from ~~71.4%~~75.8% in the third quarter of ~~2019. Average~~2020. As liquidity from stimulus deposits was invested, average taxable securities balances ~~decreased $180.2 million~~increased $1.1 billion or ~~7.8%~~51.3% from the third quarter of ~~2019, due to higher levels~~2020, and represented 21.4% of ~~calls and mortgage security-related paydowns, as well as~~total earning assets in the ~~sale~~third quarter of ~~approximately $218 million of mortgage-backed securities at the end of the first quarter, to take advantage of market opportunities and to create liquidity for COVID-19 related reasons.~~2021. Taxable securities yields decreased by 5752 basis points and tax-exempt securities yields decreased by ~~three~~35 basis points in the third quarter of ~~2020~~2021 from the third quarter of ~~2019.~~2020. The ~~recent flat and inverted yield curve~~continuing lower rate environment has resulted in the yield decrease for all securities, as calls, prepayments and maturities of legacy higher-rate securities have been replaced with purchases at lower overall market yields. Increased prepayments on mortgage-backed securities in the lower rate environment also further reduced the taxable securities yields due to higher premium amortization. The average balance of tax-exempt securities, which have the highest yields within securities, have decreased tofrom 22.2% of total average securities in the third quarter of 2020 ~~compared~~ to ~~22.9%~~16.8% of total average securities in the third quarter of ~~2019.~~2021.

Total portfolio loans increased $3.2 billion or 41.7% over the last twelve months, while total commercial loans increased $3.0 billion or 58.4%. Loan growth was achieved through $4.4 billion in total loan originations, led by $2.9 billion in business loan originations for the past twelve months. Loan growth was driven by the acquisition of OLBK in 2019, PPP loans, expanded market areas and additional commercial personnel in our core markets, but was partially offset by significant loan paydowns or payoffs as some loans moved into the secondary lending market by customers who refinanced their commercial real estate mortgages, and some financed projects were sold by their developers.35

Commercial loans with floors currently average ~~4.36%~~3.93% on approximately ~~$2.1~~$2.6 billion or ~~26%~~35% of total commercial loans at September 30, ~~2020,~~2021, as compared to ~~$2.4~~$2.3 billion averaging ~~4.50%~~4.22% or ~~33%~~29% of commercial loans at December 31, ~~2019.~~2020. Approximately ~~69%~~65% or ~~$1.5~~$1.7 billion of these loans are currently priced at their floor, as compared to ~~49%~~69% or ~~$1.2~~$1.6 billion at December 31, ~~2019.~~2020. These loans typically do not adjust as rapidly from their current floor level as compared to loans without floors, due to the amount of the rate change as compared to the floor rate or next repricing date. In addition, in a declining rate environment, ~~some~~ customers may request rates below existing contractual floors, which we may grant for competitive or other reasons.

Interest expense decreased ~~$8.2~~$7.0 million or ~~38.5%~~53.3% in the third quarter of ~~2020~~2021 and $28.9 million or 56.6% in the first nine months of 2021 as compared to the same ~~period~~periods in ~~2019,~~2020, due to decreases in the cost of all interest bearing liability categories, as ~~market rates dropped in reaction to COVID-19 and~~ management reduced certain deposit rates, ~~as well as higher purchase accounting time deposit accretion.~~and due to a decrease in the balance of outstanding FHLB borrowings. The cost of interest bearing liabilities decreased by 5628 basis points from the third quarter of ~~2019~~2020 to ~~0.53%~~0.25% in ~~2020.~~2021. Interest bearing deposits increased ~~$1.9 billion~~$784.5 million or ~~31.2%~~9.6% from the third quarter of ~~2019,~~2020, due mostly to ~~the acquisition of OLBK and increases in organic deposits heavily driven by CARES Act~~customers’ stimulus ~~deposits.~~payments. The rate on interest bearing deposits decreased 4512 basis points to ~~26 basis points~~0.14% from the third quarter of ~~2019,~~2020, primarily from aggressive decreases in rates on interest bearing public funds and certificates of deposit in response to the ~~COVID-19 pandemic.~~lower market rates, which are currently near their floors. Average non-interest bearing demand deposit balances increased from the third quarter of ~~2019~~2020 to the third quarter of ~~2020~~2021 by ~~$1.6 billion~~$462.7 million or ~~62.9%~~11.4%, and were ~~33.1%~~33.4% of total average deposits at September 30, ~~2020,~~2021, compared to ~~28.5%~~33.1% at September 30, 2020, reflecting the ~~acquired OLBK non-interest bearing demand deposits, CARES Act~~previously mentioned stimulus ~~deposits, PPP loan~~ deposits, higher personal savings balances and ongoing checking account marketing strategies. The average balance of FHLB borrowings decreased ~~$41.8~~$717.3 million from the third quarter of ~~2019~~2020 to ~~2020~~2021 due to the maturity of legacy higher-rate FHLB borrowings throughout the ~~second and third quarters~~past twelve months being ~~funded by~~redeemed with excess ~~liquidity balances.~~liquidity. These maturities ~~benefitted~~benefited the average rate paid, as it decreased by 3553 basis points to ~~2.16%~~1.63% from the third quarter of ~~2019.~~2020. Average other borrowings combined with subordinated debt and junior subordinated debt balances ~~increased $101.4~~decreased $251.6 million or ~~21.4%~~43.7% from the third quarter of ~~2019~~2020 to ~~2020, partially due to the acquisition of OLBK,~~2021, and their average rates paid decreased by ~~137~~22 and ~~139~~20 basis points, respectively, over this same time period, due primarily to decreases in LIBOR, the index upon which this variable-rate type of borrowing is ~~priced, other than the fixed rate subordinated debt.~~priced.

The ~~150 basis points in total federal funds~~continuing low rate ~~cuts in the first quarter of 2020, as well as the generally lower rates across the yield curve, are~~environment is expected to result in the core net interest margin declining a few basis points over the ~~remainder~~fourth quarter, as securities purchased toward the end of the ~~year.~~third quarter will further negatively impact the margin. Lower anticipated earning asset yields caused by loans repricing to lower rates, rates on new loan production ~~rates~~ being lower than existing ~~loan rates, and~~loans, security cash flows being reinvested at lower rates ~~are expected to~~and decreasing purchase accounting accretion should be ~~partially offset~~slightly mitigated by price reductions to deposit rates and lower wholesale funding costs. The subordinated debt payoff late in the third quarter of 2021 and the upcoming subordinated debt payoff in November, both of which were acquired in previous acquisitions, will further help to reduce the cost of interest-bearing liabilities. In addition, Wesbanco’s participation in the PPP loan program is expected to positively contribute to net interest income ~~resulting~~and further mitigate the decreases in ~~a modest positive adjustment to~~ the net interest margin ~~in future periods~~ as SBA loan forgiveness occurs for qualifying customers and net deferred fees are accreted into income at the date of loan payoff. At September 30, 2021, there were $10.4 million of remaining net deferred fees from PPP loans that will accrete into interest income as loans pay down or are forgiven by the SBA.

	For The Three Months Ended September 30,										For the Nine Months Ended September 30,										For The Three Months Ended September 30,										For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2020					2019					2020					2019					2021					2020					2021					2020
	Average		Average			Average		Average			Average		Average			Average		Average			Average		Average			Average		Average			Average		Average			Average		Average
(unaudited, dollars in thousands)	Balance		Rate			Balance		Rate			Balance		Rate			Balance		Rate			Balance		Rate			Balance		Rate			Balance		Rate			Balance		Rate
ASSETS
Due from banks - interest bearing	$	755,575		0.16	%	$	71,163		2.41	%	$	509,928		0.25	%	$	73,617		2.50	%	$	936,084		0.16	%	$	755,575		0.16	%	$	803,713		0.12	%	$	509,928		0.25	%
Loans, net of unearned income⁽¹⁾		11,107,106		4.17	%		7,751,724		4.88	%		10,813,737		4.34	%		7,704,212		4.99	%		10,164,279		4.03	%		11,107,106		4.17	%		10,562,879		4.03	%		10,813,737		4.34	%
Securities:⁽²⁾
Taxable		2,121,780		2.19	%		2,301,933		2.76	%		2,328,196		2.45	%		2,330,439		2.81	%		3,210,878		1.67	%		2,121,780		2.19	%		2,856,041		1.75	%		2,328,196		2.45	%
Tax-exempt ⁽³⁾		603,835		3.49	%		684,164		3.52	%		624,278		3.50	%		744,949		3.50	%		650,397		3.14	%		603,835		3.49	%		610,449		3.31	%		624,278		3.50	%
Total securities		2,725,615		2.47	%		2,986,097		2.93	%		2,952,474		2.67	%		3,075,388		2.97	%		3,861,275		1.91	%		2,725,615		2.47	%		3,466,490		2.03	%		2,952,474		2.67	%
Other earning assets		56,575		6.88	%		53,181		6.80	%		65,849		6.27	%		51,954		7.12	%		23,646		4.23	%		56,575		6.88	%		28,494		5.11	%		65,849		6.27	%
Total earning assets ⁽³⁾		14,644,871		3.66	%		10,862,165		4.34	%		14,341,988		3.86	%		10,905,171		4.41	%		14,985,284		3.24	%		14,644,871		3.66	%		14,861,576		3.36	%		14,341,988		3.86	%
Other assets		2,074,846					1,625,988					2,065,777					1,590,847					2,072,509					2,074,846					2,060,312					2,065,777
Total Assets	$	16,719,717				$	12,488,153				$	16,407,765				$	12,496,018				$	17,057,793				$	16,719,717				$	16,921,888				$	16,407,765

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Interest bearing demand deposits	$	2,654,161		0.18	%	$	2,126,720		0.84	%	$	2,518,952		0.32	%	$	2,131,887		0.80	%	$	3,297,702		0.10	%	$	2,654,161		0.18	%	$	3,139,992		0.12	%	$	2,518,952		0.32	%
Money market accounts		1,623,969		0.17	%		1,097,930		0.71	%		1,590,498		0.33	%		1,122,665		0.70	%		1,791,494		0.08	%		1,623,969		0.17	%		1,764,462		0.11	%		1,590,498		0.33	%
Savings deposits		2,140,932		0.06	%		1,686,267		0.20	%		2,051,930		0.10	%		1,674,262		0.16	%		2,471,593		0.04	%		2,140,932		0.06	%		2,393,066		0.04	%		2,051,930		0.10	%
Certificates of deposit		1,761,087		0.72	%		1,321,696		1.15	%		1,865,439		0.77	%		1,385,349		1.14	%		1,403,812		0.49	%		1,761,087		0.72	%		1,501,857		0.54	%		1,865,439		0.77	%
Total interest bearing deposits		8,180,149		0.26	%		6,232,613		0.71	%		8,026,819		0.37	%		6,314,163		0.69	%		8,964,601		0.14	%		8,180,149		0.26	%		8,799,377		0.17	%		8,026,819		0.37	%
Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings		1,006,593		2.16	%		1,048,401		2.51	%		1,285,266		2.18	%		1,036,464		2.49	%		289,334		1.63	%		1,006,593		2.16	%		388,518		1.85	%		1,285,266		2.18	%
Other borrowings		383,771		0.32	%		317,931		1.69	%		361,949		0.54	%		321,976		1.82	%		136,028		0.10	%		383,771		0.32	%		152,450		0.17	%		361,949		0.54	%
Subordinated debt and junior subordinated debt		192,093		3.87	%		156,561		5.26	%		194,195		4.40	%		169,944		5.37	%		188,276		3.67	%		192,093		3.87	%		191,018		3.73	%		194,195		4.40	%
Total interest bearing liabilities ⁽¹⁾⁽⁴⁾		9,762,606		0.53	%		7,755,506		1.09	%		9,868,229		0.69	%		7,842,547		1.07	%		9,578,239		0.25	%		9,762,606		0.53	%		9,531,363		0.31	%		9,868,229		0.69	%
Non-interest bearing demand deposits		4,041,681					2,481,384					3,679,743					2,463,076					4,504,332					4,041,681					4,402,487					3,679,743
Other liabilities		252,917					153,729					239,797					139,761					197,916					252,917					205,309					239,797
Shareholders’ equity		2,662,513					2,097,534					2,619,996					2,050,634					2,777,306					2,662,513					2,782,729					2,619,996
Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity	$	16,719,717				$	12,488,153				$	16,407,765				$	12,496,018				$	17,057,793				$	16,719,717				$	16,921,888				$	16,407,765
Taxable equivalent net interest spread				3.13	%				3.25	%				3.17	%				3.34	%				2.99	%				3.13	%				3.05	%				3.17	%
Taxable equivalent net interest margin				3.31	%				3.56	%				3.38	%				3.64	%				3.08	%				3.31	%				3.16	%				3.38	%

TABLE 3. RATE/VOLUME ANALYSIS OF CHANGES IN INTEREST INCOME AND INTEREST EXPENSE

	For The Three Months Ended September 30, 2020									For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2020									For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2021									For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2021
	Compared to September 30, 2019									Compared to September 30, 2019									Compared to September 30, 2020									Compared to September 30, 2020
(unaudited, in thousands)	Volume			Rate			Net Increase (Decrease)			Volume			Rate			Net Increase (Decrease)			Volume			Rate			Net Increase (Decrease)			Volume			Rate			Net Increase (Decrease)
Increase (decrease) in interest income:
Due from banks - interest bearing	$	(138	)	$	13		$	(125	)	$	(481	)	$	73		$	(408	)	$	73		$	-		$	73		$	408		$	(635	)	$	(227	)
Loans, net of unearned income		32,065			(10,910	)		21,155			93,890			(30,082	)		63,808			(9,660	)		(3,658	)		(13,318	)		(8,002	)		(24,561	)		(32,563	)
Taxable securities		(1,173	)		(3,045	)		(4,218	)		(47	)		(6,312	)		(6,359	)		5,020			(3,208	)		1,812			8,459			(13,694	)		(5,235	)
Tax-exempt securities ⁽¹⁾		(705	)		(25	)		(730	)		(3,166	)		(2	)		(3,168	)		391			(542	)		(151	)		(357	)		(928	)		(1,285	)
Other earning assets		58			16			74			579			(262	)		317			(438	)		(289	)		(727	)		(1,507	)		(492	)		(1,999	)
Total interest income change ⁽¹⁾		30,107			(13,951	)		16,156			90,775			(36,585	)		54,190			(4,614	)		(7,697	)		(12,311	)		(999	)		(40,310	)		(41,309	)
Increase (decrease) in interest expense:
Interest bearing demand deposits		1,518			(4,782	)		(3,264	)		2,916			(9,695	)		(6,779	)		250			(660	)		(410	)		1,213			(4,324	)		(3,111	)
Money market accounts		2,177			(3,443	)		(1,266	)		7,315			(9,259	)		(1,944	)		67			(424	)		(357	)		390			(2,839	)		(2,449	)
Savings deposits		332			(890	)		(558	)		708			(1,246	)		(538	)		42			(101	)		(59	)		221			(975	)		(754	)
Certificates of deposit		5,121			(5,754	)		(633	)		(16,585	)		15,519			(1,066	)		(568	)		(903	)		(1,471	)		(1,852	)		(2,791	)		(4,643	)
Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings		(257	)		(931	)		(1,188	)		3,480			(1,767	)		1,713			(3,190	)		(1,075	)		(4,265	)		(12,826	)		(2,769	)		(15,595	)
Other borrowings		358			(1,407	)		(1,049	)		627			(3,565	)		(2,938	)		(130	)		(141	)		(271	)		(577	)		(685	)		(1,262	)
Subordinated debt and junior subordinated debt		1,202			(1,408	)		(206	)		1,661			(2,081	)		(420	)		(37	)		(91	)		(128	)		(103	)		(961	)		(1,064	)
Total interest expense change		10,451			(18,615	)		(8,164	)		122			(12,094	)		(11,972	)		(3,566	)		(3,395	)		(6,961	)		(13,534	)		(15,344	)		(28,878	)
Net interest income increase (decrease) ⁽¹⁾	$	19,656		$	4,664		$	24,320		$	90,653		$	(24,491	)	$	66,162
Net interest income (decrease) increase ⁽¹⁾																			$	(1,048	)	$	(4,302	)	$	(5,350	)	$	12,535		$	(24,966	)	$	(12,431	)

The provision for credit losses – loans is the amount to be added to the allowance for credit losses – loans after net ~~charge-offs~~(charge-offs) recoveries have been ~~deducted~~(deducted) added to bring the allowance to a level considered appropriate to absorb lifetime expected losses for all portfolio loans. The provision for credit losses – loan commitments is the amount to be added to the allowance for credit losses for loan commitments to bring that allowance to a level considered appropriate to absorb lifetime expected losses on unfunded loan commitments. The provision for credit losses - loans and loan commitments ~~increased~~decreased to ($1.7) million in the third quarter of 2021 compared to $16.3 million in the third quarter of 2020, ~~compared to $4.1 million in the third quarter of 2019 due to the adoption of CECL on January 1, 2020, and~~ as a result of changes in the macroeconomic forecast ~~resulting in expected~~and certain other qualitative factors. As of September 30, 2021, the macroeconomic forecast estimated significantly ~~higher~~lower unemployment over the reasonable and supportable forecast period of oneyear, ~~primarily increasing~~as compared to the forecast utilized during the third quarter of 2020, resulting in a decrease in the allowance for loan losses and allowance for loan commitments. Non-performing loans were ~~0.38%~~0.40% of total loans as of September 30, ~~2020, decreasing~~2021, increasing from ~~0.52%~~0.38% of total loans at the end of the third quarter of ~~2019. Non-performing assets were 0.38% of total loans and other real estate and repossessed assets as of September 30, 2020, decreasing from 0.57% at the end of the third quarter of 2019.~~2020. Criticized and classified loans were ~~3.25%~~4.21% of total loans ~~increasing from 2.24%~~ as of September 30, ~~2019,~~2021, increasing from 3.25% as of September 30, 2020, primarily due to recent adjustments to the internal loan classification system, which impacted risk grades, and downgrades in the Company’s hospitality loan portfolio. Past due loans at September 30, ~~2020~~2021 were ~~0.25%~~0.44% of total loans, compared to ~~0.30%~~0.25% at September 30, ~~2019.~~2020. Annualized net loan charge-offs ~~decreased~~increased to ~~zero percent as of~~0.01% for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2020~~2021 compared to ~~0.04% as of~~0.08% for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2019.~~2020. (Please see the Allowance for Credit Losses – Loans and Loan Commitments section of this MD&A for additional discussion).

	For The Three Months Ended September 30,												For the Nine Months Ended September 30,										For The Three Months Ended September 30,												For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
(unaudited, dollars in thousands)	2020			2019			$ Change			% Change			2020		2019		$ Change			% Change			2021			2020			$ Change			% Change			2021		2020		$ Change			% Change
Trust fees	$	6,426		$	6,425		$	1			0.0		$	19,580	$	19,880	$	(300	)		(1.5	)	$	7,289		$	6,426		$	863			13.4		$	22,069	$	19,580	$	2,489			12.7
Service charges on deposits		5,332			7,056			(1,724	)		(24.4	)		16,272		19,803		(3,531	)		(17.8	)		6,050			5,332			718			13.5			15,820		16,272		(452	)		(2.8	)
Electronic banking fees		4,780			5,253			(473	)		(9.0	)		13,100		18,299		(5,199	)		(28.4	)		5,427			4,780			647			13.5			14,853		13,100		1,753			13.4
Net securities brokerage revenue		1,725			1,765			(40	)		(2.3	)		4,787		5,597		(810	)		(14.5	)		1,965			1,725			240			13.9			5,318		4,787		531			11.1
Bank-owned life insurance		2,088			1,373			715			52.1			5,609		4,032		1,577			39.1			2,656			2,088			568			27.2			6,072		5,609		463			8.3
Net securities gains		787			235			552			234.9			3,577		3,800		(223	)		(5.9	)
Net securities (losses) gains																								(15	)		787			(802	)		(101.9	)		740		3,577		(2,837	)		(79.3	)
Mortgage banking income		8,488			2,588			5,900			228.0			17,295		5,262		12,033			228.7			4,563			8,488			(3,925	)		(46.2	)		16,656		17,295		(639	)		(3.7	)
Net insurance services revenue		1,026			812			214			26.4			2,807		2,507		300			12.0			909			1,026			(117	)		(11.4	)		3,044		2,807		237			8.4
Debit card sponsorship income		751			—			751			100.0			2,102		—		2,102			100.0			—			751			(751	)		(100.0	)		646		2,102		(1,456	)		(69.3	)
Payment processing fees		669			709			(40	)		(5.6	)		2,133		2,142		(9	)		(0.4	)		773			669			104			15.5			2,234		2,133		101			4.7
Net gain on other real estate owned and other assets		(19	)		158			(177	)		(112.0	)		84		670		(586	)		(87.5	)
Swap fee and valuation income		1,286			(381	)		1,667			437.5			4,134		499		3,635			728.5
Net gain (loss) on other real estate owned and other assets																								785			(19	)		804		NM				4,974		84		4,890		NM
Net swap fee and valuation income																								776			1,286			(510	)		(39.7	)		5,386		4,134		1,252			30.3
Other		1,273			957			316			33.0			4,001		3,387		614			18.1			1,577			1,273			304			23.9			4,264		4,001		263			6.6
Total non-interest income	$	34,612		$	26,950		$	7,662			28.4		$	95,481	$	85,878	$	9,603			11.2		$	32,755		$	34,612		$	(1,857	)		(5.4	)	$	102,076	$	95,481	$	6,595			6.9

Non-interest income is a significant source of revenue and an important part of Wesbanco’s results of operations, as it represents ~~21.0%~~22.7% of total revenue for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2020.~~2021. Wesbanco offers its customers a wide range of retail, commercial, investment and electronic banking services, which are viewed as a vital component of Wesbanco’s ability to attract and maintain customers, as well as providing additional fee income beyond normal spread-related income to Wesbanco. For the third quarter of ~~2020,~~2021, non-interest income ~~increased $7.7~~decreased $1.9 million or ~~28.4%~~5.4% compared to the third quarter of ~~2019,~~2020, primarily due to a ~~$5.9~~$3.9 million ~~or 228.0% increase~~decrease in mortgage banking income, a $0.8 million decrease in net securities (losses) gains and a ~~$1.7~~$0.8 million ~~or 437.5% increase~~decrease in ~~swap fee and valuation income.~~debit card sponsorship income, due to the sale of the business line earlier in 2021. The ~~increases~~decreases were somewhat offset by ~~the Durbin amendment~~a $0.9 million increase in trust fees, a $0.8 million increase in net gain (loss) on other real estate owned and ~~its impact on electronic banking fees~~other assets and ~~the COVID-19 impact on several revenue streams, with the largest decreases~~a $0.7 million increase in service charges on deposits and electronic banking fees. For the nine months ended September 30, 2020, non-interest income increased $9.6 million or 11.2% from the nine months ended September 30, 2019 for similar reasons as for the third quarter.deposits.

Trust fees ~~were flat~~increased $0.9 million or 13.4% compared to the third quarter of ~~2019.~~2020, due to market value appreciation and organic growth. Total trust assets were $5.5 billion at September 30, 2021 as compared to $4.6 billion at September 30, ~~2020 as compared to $4.4 billion at~~2020. As of September 30, ~~2019. At September 30, 2020,~~2021, trust assets include managed assets of ~~$3.7~~$4.4 billion and non-managed (custodial) assets of ~~$0.9~~$1.1 billion. Assets managed for the WesMark Funds, a proprietary group of mutual funds that is advised by Wesbanco Trust and Investment Services, were $1.0 billion as of September 30, 2021 and $943.6 million as of September 30, 2020, ~~and $914.6 million at September 30, 2019,~~ and are included in managed assets.

Service charges on deposits ~~decreased $1.7~~increased $0.7 million or ~~24.4%~~13.5% to ~~$5.3~~$6.1 million in the third quarter of ~~2020~~2021 as compared to the same period in ~~2019~~2020 due to ~~higher consumer deposit balances throughout the quarter associated with CARES Act stimulus payments and lower~~increased general consumer spending over the prior period, resulting in ~~fewer~~more eligible fee-generating transactions. For the nine months ended September 30, ~~2020,~~2021, service charges on deposits decreased ~~$3.5~~$0.5 million or ~~17.8%~~2.8% compared to the nine months ended September 30, ~~2019.~~ 2020 due to higher customer demand for goods and services as business conditions improved from the pandemic.

Electronic banking fees, which include debit card interchange fees, ~~decreased $0.5~~increased $0.6 million or ~~9.0%~~13.5% compared to the third quarter of ~~2019 due~~2020 as we transitioned to adjusted settlement processes of a ~~lower volume of transactions.~~new third-party digital banking service provider. This ~~quarter marks the one-year anniversary~~change occurred as part of the ~~limitation on interchange fees due to the Durbin amendment in the 2010 Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (“Dodd-Frank Act”).~~core conversion. For the nine months ended September 30, ~~2020,~~2021, electronic banking fees ~~decreased $5.2~~increased $1.8 million or ~~28.4% due~~13.4% compared to the ~~effect of the Dodd-Frank Act in~~nine months ended September 30, 2020.

Bank-owned life insurance increased ~~$0.7~~$0.6 million or ~~52.1% in the third quarter of 2020~~27.2% compared to the third quarter of ~~2019~~2020 due to ~~higher~~an increase in mortality-related benefits received in the current period as well as an increase in the cash surrender value, due to the purchase of an additional $40 million of bank-owned life insurance acquired in the OLBK acquisition. As of September 30, 2020, total cash surrender value was $304.3 million compared to $229.3 million at September 30, 2019. For the nine months ended, bank-owned life insurance increased $1.6 million or 39.1% for similar reasons as the three months ended.

~~Net securities gains increased $0.6 million or 234.9%~~ in the third quarter of ~~2020~~2021.

Net securities (losses) gains include both gains and losses on investment security transactions as well as market value adjustments on the deferred compensation plan. For the three months ended September 30, 2021, net securities (losses) gains decreased $0.8 million or 101.9% compared to the same period of ~~2019,~~2020, due to a $0.7 million decrease in market ~~adjustment recorded in the third quarter of 2020~~adjustments on ~~the underlying investments of~~ the deferred compensation ~~plan, which is offset by a corresponding amount~~plan. These market adjustments had an offsetting effect in employee benefits expense. For the nine months ended September 30, ~~2020,~~2021, net securities (losses) gains decreased ~~$0.2~~$2.8 million or ~~5.9%~~79.3% compared to the nine months ended September 30, ~~2019~~2020, due primarily to ~~a gain of $2.6 million~~no security sales being transacted during the year 2021. Gains on the sale of Wesbanco’s VISA Class B stock in the second quarter of 2019. This stock was held at a zero cost basis and Wesbanco holds no additional shares of VISA Class B stock. Wesbanco recordedsecurity sales totaled $2.1 million ~~of gains in~~for the ~~first quarter of 2020 on the sale of approximately $218 million of mortgage-backed securities to take advantage of market opportunities and to increase liquidity.~~nine months ended September 30, 2020.

Mortgage banking income ~~increased $5.9~~decreased $3.9 million or ~~228.0% from~~46.2% in the third quarter of ~~2019~~2021 compared to the third quarter of ~~2020.~~2020, as Wesbanco retained more 1-to-4 family mortgages on the balance sheet. For the third quarter of ~~2020,~~2021, mortgage production was ~~$394.3~~$382.4 million, which was ~~an increase~~a decrease of ~~101.2%~~2.9% from the comparable ~~2019~~2020 period. For the three months ended September 30, ~~2020, $217.6~~2021, $149.6 million in mortgages were sold into the secondary market at a net margin of ~~3.9%~~3.1% as compared to ~~$98.5~~$217.6 million at a net margin of ~~2.6%~~3.9% in the comparable ~~2019~~2020 period. Included in mortgage banking income and the calculation of net margin noted above are losses of ~~$1.6~~($0.2) million and ~~$0.5~~gains of $1.5 million from the fair value adjustments on mortgage loan commitments and related derivatives for the three months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2021, mortgage banking income decreased by $0.6 million or 3.7% compared to the prior year period, due primarily to fair value adjustments of ($4.4) million and ~~2019, respectively.~~ $2.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively, offsetting a $144.5 million volume increase in loans sold from the prior year period.

Debit card sponsorship income, is a ~~new~~non-essential revenue stream for Wesbanco that was acquired in the ~~OLBK~~Old Line Bancshares, Inc. (“OLBK”) acquisition and generated $0.6 million of gross revenue in the first quarter of 2021, was sold as of March 31, 2021 to another bank. The all-cash purchase price, which will be paid out on ~~November 22, 2019. The fees are~~a monthly basis over a two-year period up to a maximum of $2.8 million, is based on a 50%-50% split of the monthly gross revenue earned ~~from Wesbanco’s sponsorship of certain customers into various debit networks and are generated from~~by the ~~total transactions processed~~purchasing bank. Wesbanco has recognized $0.8 million in revenue in 2021 following the sale, which is recorded in net gain (loss) on the ~~debit networks. Debit sponsorship income was~~sale of other real estate owned and other assets.

Net gain (loss) on other real estate owned and other assets increased $0.8 million ~~for~~in the ~~quarter~~three months ended September 30, 2021 as compared to the same period in 2020,due to a gain recognized on an investment made by Wesbanco’s Community Development Corporation in a start-up firm more than ten years ago that was recently acquired by a public company. Net gain (loss) on other real estate owned and ~~$2.1~~other assets increased by $4.9 million ~~for~~in the nine months ended September 30, ~~2020. Wesbanco intends to reduce this program’s customer-related revenues over~~2021 for the ~~next 12-18~~same reason as discussed for the three months ~~for risk-related reasons.~~ended.

Net swap fee and valuation income, ~~increased $1.7~~which includes fair value adjustments, decreased $0.5 million or ~~437.5% for~~39.7% in the third quarter of ~~2020~~2021 compared to the third quarter of ~~2019~~2020 due to ~~an increased~~a reduced volume of new ~~loan~~ swaps originated, resulting in ~~the third quarter of 2020 and an increase in the fair value of existing swaps.~~less fee income. For the three months ended September 30, ~~2020,~~2021, new swaps executed totaled $9.3 million in notional principal resulting in $0.4 million of fee income, compared to new swaps executed of $25.8 million in notional principal resulting in $0.9 million of fee income ~~compared to new swaps executed of $6.7 million in notional principal resulting in $0.2 million of fee income~~ for the three months ended September 30, ~~2019.~~2020. Fair value adjustments on existing swaps for the three months ended September 30, ~~2020~~2021 and ~~2019~~2020 were $0.4 ~~million and ($0.6) million, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2020,~~million. Net swap fee and valuation income increased ~~$3.6~~$1.3 million or ~~728.5% for similar reasons~~30.3% in the first nine months of 2021 compared to the first nine months of 2020 due to higher fair value adjustments offsetting a reduced volume of new swaps in the year-to-date period. Fair value adjustments totaled $2.1 million in the first nine months of 2021 as compared to ($2.8) million in fair value adjustments for the ~~quarter.~~first nine months of 2020.

	For The Three Months Ended September 30,												For the Nine Months Ended September 30,											For The Three Months Ended September 30,											For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
(unaudited, dollars in thousands)	2020			2019			$ Change			% Change			2020			2019		$ Change			% Change			2021		2020			$ Change			% Change			2021		2020			$ Change			% Change
Salaries and wages	$	38,342		$	32,915		$	5,427			16.5		$	114,025		$	95,501	$	18,524			19.4		$	39,497	$	38,342		$	1,155			3.0		$	113,822	$	114,025		$	(203	)		(0.2	)
Employee benefits		10,604			9,726			878			9.0			31,115			29,419		1,696			5.8			10,658		10,604			54			0.5			30,191		31,115			(924	)		(3.0	)
Net occupancy		7,092			5,392			1,700			31.5			20,809			16,343		4,466			27.3			6,825		7,092			(267	)		(3.8	)		20,430		20,809			(379	)		(1.8	)
Equipment		6,229			5,273			956			18.1			17,991			14,924		3,067			20.6
Equipment and software																									7,609		6,229			1,380			22.2			21,654		17,991			3,663			20.4
Marketing		1,577			1,505			72			4.8			4,282			4,002		280			7.0			1,848		1,577			271			17.2			6,033		4,282			1,751			40.9
FDIC insurance		1,948			(1,221	)		3,169			259.5			6,456			1,287		5,169			401.6			1,227		1,948			(721	)		(37.0	)		2,690		6,456			(3,766	)		(58.3	)
Amortization of intangible assets		3,346			2,446			900			36.8			10,085			7,424		2,661			35.8			2,854		3,346			(492	)		(14.7	)		8,622		10,085			(1,463	)		(14.5	)
Restructuring and merger-related expenses		3,608			1,688			1,920			113.7			9,241			4,876		4,365			89.5			4,467		3,608			859			23.8			6,540		9,241			(2,701	)		(29.2	)
Franchise and other miscellaneous taxes		3,803			3,203			600			18.7			11,014			9,405		1,609			17.1			2,369		3,803			(1,434	)		(37.7	)		7,462		11,014			(3,552	)		(32.2	)
Consulting, regulatory, accounting and advisory fees		3,103			2,212			891			40.3			9,182			6,267		2,915			46.5			3,161		3,103			58			1.9			9,173		9,182			(9	)		(0.1	)
ATM and electronic banking interchange expenses		2,188			1,804			384			21.3			5,940			5,239		701			13.4			2,300		2,188			112			5.1			6,985		5,940			1,045			17.6
Postage and courier expenses		1,180			1,299			(119	)		(9.2	)		3,768			4,045		(277	)		(6.8	)		1,131		1,180			(49	)		(4.2	)		3,714		3,768			(54	)		(1.4	)
Legal fees		812			628			184			29.3			2,463			2,243		220			9.8			1,132		812			320			39.4			2,928		2,463			465			18.9
Communications		997			898			99			11.0			3,241			2,723		518			19.0			1,051		997			54			5.4			3,071		3,241			(170	)		(5.2	)
Supplies		993			1,055			(62	)		(5.9	)		3,520			3,301		219			6.6			1,039		993			46			4.6			2,915		3,520			(605	)		(17.2	)
Other real estate owned and foreclosure expenses		(10	)		176			(186	)		(105.7	)		(27	)		339		(366	)		(108.0	)		180		(10	)		190			1,900.0			148		(27	)		175			648.1
Other		4,131			4,269			(138	)		(3.2	)		13,674			12,314		1,360			11.0			7,353		4,131			3,222			78.0			18,462		13,674			4,788			35.0
Total non-interest expense	$	89,943		$	73,268		$	16,675			22.8		$	266,779		$	219,652	$	47,127			21.5		$	94,701	$	89,943		$	4,758			5.3		$	264,840	$	266,779		$	(1,939	)		(0.7	)

Non-interest expense in the third quarter of ~~2020~~2021 increased ~~$16.7~~$4.8 million or ~~22.8%~~5.3% compared to the same quarter in ~~2019,~~2020, principally from a $3.2 million increase in other operating expenses, due to ~~the OLBK acquisition, which increased assets~~$2.6 million in legal settlement costs, as well as a $1.2 million increase in salaries and wages and a $1.4 million increase in equipment and software expense. These increases were somewhat offset by ~~$3.0 billion, excluding goodwill,~~a $1.4 million decrease in franchise and ~~added 37 offices to our branch network.~~other miscellaneous taxes and a $0.7 million decrease in FDIC insurance expense. In the third quarter of ~~2020,~~2021, there were ~~$0.6~~$4.5 million of restructuring expenses related to the branch optimization strategy and core operating system conversion as compared to $3.6 million of restructuring and merger-related expenses ~~for~~related to the OLBK acquisition ~~as compared to $1.7 million~~and branch optimization strategy in the third quarter of ~~2019.~~2020. Excluding restructuring and merger-related expenses, non-interest expense increased ~~$14.8~~$3.9 million or ~~20.6%~~4.5% from the third quarter of ~~2019~~2020 to the third quarter of ~~2020~~2021, and ~~increased $42.8~~$0.8 million or ~~19.9%~~0.3% from the first nine months of ~~2019~~2020 to the first nine months of ~~2020.~~2021.

Salaries and wages increased ~~$5.4~~$1.2 million or ~~16.5%~~3.0% in the third quarter of 2021 from the third quarter of ~~2019~~2020 due primarily to increases in incentive compensation expense. Short term incentive expense increased $1.3 million as overall higher performance in 2021 is expected as compared to 2020, along with higher incentive stock compensation expense which is up by $0.5 million from the third quarter of 2020. Commission expense increased due to increased ~~compensation expense related to an increase~~business transactions in ~~full-time~~commission-earning business lines, such as securities brokerage and mortgage loan originations. These increases were mitigated by a 7.4% reduction in full time equivalent (“FTE”) employees from the ~~OLBK acquisition~~third quarter of 2020 as a result of the closure of branches at various points in 2021, as the branch optimization strategy was executed, and ~~from annual merit~~a temporary hiring freeze earlier in 2021. For the nine months ended September 30, 2021, salaries and wages decreased by $0.2 million or 0.2%, due primarily to the reduction in FTE employees, mostly offset by the noted increases in ~~mid-2020.~~ incentive compensation.

Employee benefits expense increased ~~$0.9~~$0.1 million or ~~9.0% compared to the third quarter of 2019, due mostly to a $0.7 million market adjustment~~0.5% in the third quarter of 2021 from the third quarter of 2020 as reduced pension expense and a reduction in the market adjustment on the underlying investments of the deferred compensation ~~plan. For~~plan mitigated a $1.4 million increase in health insurance expense resulting from an increase in claims in the third quarter of 2021. Employee benefits expense decreased $0.9 million or 3.0% in the first nine months ~~ended, salaries and wages and employee benefits expense increased for~~of 2021 as compared to the same ~~reasons as noted for the quarter.~~period in 2020 due to a decrease in pension expense and FTEs.

~~Net occupancy~~Equipment and software costs increased ~~$1.7~~$1.4 million or ~~31.5% from~~22.2% compared to the third quarter of 2020, ~~principally~~ due to the core conversion, continuous improvements in technology and communication infrastructure, an increase in asset size, increased ~~building-related costs including utilities, lease expense, depreciation, repairs~~usage of digital banking services and ~~other seasonal maintenance costs, mostly from the acquired retail branches, as well as normal building maintenance and repair costs of the legacy branch network and other infrastructure needs.~~SBA PPP loan forgiveness fees. For the nine months ended September 30, ~~2020, net occupancy~~2021, equipment costs increased ~~$4.5~~$3.7 million or ~~27.3%~~20.4% compared to the nine months ended September 30, ~~2019.~~

Equipment costs increased $1.0 million or 18.1% compared to the third quarter of 2019, due to the OLBK acquisition and increases in service agreements expense from continuous improvements in technology and communication infrastructure, software costs and loan origination and customer support centers.

FDIC insurance increased $3.2 million or 259.5% compared to the third quarter of 2019, for risk-related reasons and due to the growth in the Bank’s balance sheet primarily from the OLBK acquisition in November 2019, which caused the assessment base to increase, as well as the recording of a $2.4 million assessment credit in the prior year period. For the nine months ended September 30, 2020, ~~FDIC insurance increased $5.2 million or 401.6% compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2019~~ for the same reasons as indicated for the ~~quarter.~~three months ended.

~~Amortization of intangible assets increased $0.9~~FDIC insurance decreased $0.7 million or ~~36.8%~~37.0% compared to the third quarter of ~~2019. The OLBK acquisition added approximately $32.9~~2020, due to certain improved large bank assessment rate risk factors, ultimately lowering the assessment rate. FDIC insurance decreased $3.8 million or 58.3% in ~~core deposit intangibles. For~~ the first nine months ~~ended September 30, 2020, amortization~~ of ~~intangible assets increased $2.7 million or 35.8%~~2021 as compared to the first nine months ~~ended September 30, 2019.~~of 2020, due to a $1.0 million refund received in the second quarter of 2021 from prior period call report adjustments, as well as for the reason mentioned for the three months ended.

Restructuring and merger-related expenses in the third quarter of ~~2020~~2021 totaled ~~$3.6~~$4.5 million, an increase of which $3.0 million were related to the financial center optimization strategy announced by Wesbanco during the third quarter, and $0.6 million were related to the OLBK acquisition that closed in the fourth quarter of 2019. The restructuring expenses were predominantly net write-downs to appraised value on owned and leased properties that will be closed as part of the strategy in early 2021. The merger-related expenses included $0.2 million in change in control payments, $0.2 million in contract termination costs, $0.1 million in non-refundable one-time conversion costs and $0.1 million in retention bonuses.

~~Consulting, regulatory, accounting and advisory fees increased~~ $0.9 million ~~or 40.3%~~ from the third quarter of ~~2019 due~~2020. The $4.5 million of expenses in the third quarter of 2021 consisted of $3.7 million in expenses related to ~~increased swap clearing expense from~~the core banking software conversion, including termination fees of existing contracts, and $0.8 million in branch closure and lease termination expenses associated with the closure of six branches in July as a ~~higher volume~~result of ~~cleared swaps~~the continued execution of the branch optimization strategy. The restructuring and merger-related expenses in the third quarter of 2020 totaling $3.6 million were comprised of $3.0 million in expenses relating to the branch optimization strategy announced in the prior year’s third quarter along with $0.6 million in merger-related expenses associated with the OLBK acquisition. For the nine months ended September 30, 2021, restructuring and merger related expenses totaled $6.5 million as compared to ~~same period~~$9.2 million for the nine months ended in the prior year period. The $6.5 million of ~~2019,~~expenses in the first nine months of 2021 consisted of $4.9 million in core banking software conversion expenses and $1.6 million of branch restructuring expenses, while the $9.2 million in expenses in the first nine months of 2020 consisted of $6.3 million in OLBK merger-related expenses and $2.9 million in branch restructuring expenses.

Franchise and other miscellaneous taxes decreased $1.4 million or 37.7% from the third quarter of 2020, primarily due to the elimination of Kentucky bank franchise taxes effective on January 1, 2021, as well as ~~increased underwriting~~various state franchise tax filed return accrual adjustments and ~~processing fees from a higher volume~~associated refunds. Wesbanco is now subject to Kentucky state income taxes, which are reflected within the provision for income taxes on the income statement, and is part of ~~mortgage originations~~the Company’s effective tax rate calculation. For similar reasons, franchise and other miscellaneous taxes decreased $3.6 million or 32.2% in the ~~current period.~~ nine months ended September 30, 2021 as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2020.

The provision for income taxes was $10.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2021, which is a $3.0 million increase compared to $7.7 million for the three months ended September 30, ~~2020, which is a $0.7 million decrease compared to the three months ended September 30, 2019.~~2020. The ~~decrease~~increase in the provision for income taxes is due to ~~a decrease~~an increase in the effective tax rate to 19.3% in the third quarter of 2021 compared to 15.7% in the third quarter of ~~2020 compared~~2020. This increase resulted from higher pre-tax income primarily due to ~~18.2%~~the negative provision for credit losses recorded in the third quarter of ~~2019.~~2021, as compared to an increased provision for credit losses in the third quarter of 2020 due to the pandemic. In addition, as mentioned above, Kentucky state income taxes are now reflected within the provision for income taxes and the effective tax rate calculation for 2021. For the nine months ended September 30, ~~2020,~~2021, the provision for income taxes was $47.4 million as compared to $11.3 million ~~which is a $16.0 million decrease compared to~~for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2019. The decrease in~~2020, reflecting the provision for income taxes is primarily driven by the $69.3 million decrease in pre-tax income and $0.9 million of discrete benefit items in the first nine months of 2020. The year-to-date effective tax rate decreased to 14.1%,same reasons above as ~~compared to 18.2%,~~ for the ~~first nine~~three months ~~of 2019.~~ended.

Total assets and deposits increased 2.8% and 8.0%, respectively, while shareholders’ equity ~~increased 5.3%~~decreased 1.2%, ~~10.9% and 5.4%, respectively,~~ compared to December 31, ~~2019.~~2020. Total securities ~~decreased $452.9 million~~increased $1.2 billion or ~~13.9%~~45.3% from December 31, ~~2019~~2020 to September 30, ~~2020,~~2021, primarily driven by the ~~first quarter sale~~purchase of mortgage-backed securities and ~~collateralized mortgage~~municipal obligations ~~at a net gain of $2.1 million, to provide for~~with additional liquidity ~~for potential COVID-19 related requirements,~~provided by CARES Act individual and family payments, as well as ~~higher security calls and prepayments.~~deposits from small businesses obtaining loans from the PPP program. The securities’ ~~decrease~~increase was partially offset by a ~~$46.8~~$37.1 million ~~increase~~decrease in ~~net~~ unrealized gains in the available-for-sale portfolio. Total portfolio loans, ~~increased $721.6~~excluding PPP loans, decreased $421.9 million or ~~7.0%~~4.2% as ~~participation in~~commercial, residential real estate, home equity and consumer loan pay downs outpaced new originations. Forgiveness related to the ~~SBA~~2020 and 2021 PPP loan ~~program provided approximately $853.1~~programs totaled $939.7 million ~~in loans.~~through the first nine months of 2021. Deposits increased ~~$1.2 billion~~$993.9 million from year-end resulting from increases of ~~22.1%~~13.1%, ~~12.0%~~12.4%, and ~~6.7%~~4.7% in demand deposits, savings deposits, and money market deposits, respectively, which were partially offset by a ~~16.9%~~16.3% decrease in certificates of deposit. The growth in transaction-based accounts is primarily attributable to ~~marketing,~~CARES Act stimulus funds received, increased personal savings and reduced customer ~~incentives,~~spending, focused retail and business strategies to obtain more account relationships and customers’ preferences for shorter-term maturities. The ~~transaction-based~~transaction accounts also increased ~~towards the end of the first quarter and into the second quarter~~ from ~~the CARES Act individual and family payments, as well as deposits from the small businesses~~business customers obtaining loans from the PPP loan program and ~~an increase~~depositing proceeds in ~~personal savings rates and overall decreased consumer spending. Deposit balances~~their checking accounts. Deposits were also somewhat impacted by bonus and royalty payments for Marcellus and Utica shale gas payments from energy companies in Wesbanco’s southwestern Pennsylvania, eastern Ohio, and northern West Virginia markets. The decrease in certificates of deposit is a result of lower overall rates and management periodically offering lower than median competitive rates for maturing certificates of deposit ~~primarily for single-service customers,~~ and customer preferences for other deposit types, ~~coupled with~~which was partially offset by a ~~$26.8~~$3.3 million ~~decrease~~increase in CDARS® balances. ~~The decline was also impacted by customer run-off of higher cost certificates of deposit from~~Also, certain IRA accounts were reclassified to savings account types upon the ~~OLBK acquisition.~~core conversion in August. Total borrowings decreased ~~27.9%~~46.2% or ~~$529.2~~$454.0 million during the first nine months of ~~2020~~2021 as additional liquidity permitted the pay down of maturing FHLB ~~maturities exceeded new FHLB borrowings~~advances by ~~$621.0~~$340.1 million, coupled with ~~$6.7~~an $89.4 million ~~of junior subordinated debentures, acquired from OLBK, which were redeemed during the first nine months of 2020. These decreases were partially offset by a $99.5 million increase~~decrease in other short-term borrowings, and a $24.6 million decrease in subordinated debentures primarily ~~customer repos.~~from a $25.0 million early redemption in the third quarter. Total shareholders’ equity ~~increased~~decreased approximately ~~$139.0~~$32.8 million or ~~5.4%~~1.2%, compared to December 31, ~~2019,~~2020, primarily due to ~~$144.5~~a $26.9 million decrease in ~~net proceeds from~~other comprehensive income and the ~~issuance~~repurchase of ~~6.0~~common shares totaling $128.0 million, ~~depositary shares, each representing 1/40~~^th ~~interest in a share of Wesbanco’s 6.75% fixed rate reset non-cumulative perpetual Series A preferred stock. Additionally,~~which were partially offset by net income ~~exceeded~~exceeding dividends for the period by $4.8 million and comprehensive income increased $37.1 million. Such factors were partially offset by the retained earnings effect of ASU 2016-13 adoption totaling $26.6 million, share repurchases in the first quarter totaling $25.0 million and restricted stock vesting activity totaling $0.3$115.1 million.

	September 30,			December 31,									September 30,			December 31,
(unaudited, dollars in thousands)	2020			2019			Change ($)			Change (%)			2021			2020			Change ($)			Change (%)
Equity securities (at fair value)	$	12,516		$	12,343		$	173			1.4		$	13,451		$	13,047		$	404			3.1
Available-for-sale debt securities (at fair value)
U.S. Treasury		19,992			32,836			(12,844	)		(39.1	)		10,000			39,982			(29,982	)		(75.0	)
U.S. Government sponsored entities and agencies		192,849			159,628			33,221			20.8			233,435			211,682			21,753			10.3
Residential mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations of government sponsored entities and agencies		1,421,023			1,815,987			(394,964	)		(21.7	)		2,294,456			1,264,737			1,029,719			81.4
Commercial mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations of government sponsored entities and agencies		259,610			190,409			69,201			36.3			321,549			320,098			1,451			0.5
Obligations of states and political subdivisions		126,539			145,609			(19,070	)		(13.1	)		109,821			115,762			(5,941	)		(5.1	)
Corporate debt securities		25,911			49,089			(23,178	)		(47.2	)		17,542			25,875			(8,333	)		(32.2	)
Total available-for-sale debt securities	$	2,045,924		$	2,393,558		$	(347,634	)		(14.5	)	$	2,986,803		$	1,978,136		$	1,008,667			51.0
Held-to-maturity debt securities (at amortized cost)
U.S. Government sponsored entities and agencies	$	8,256		$	9,216		$	(960	)		(10.4	)	$	6,639		$	7,779		$	(1,140	)		(14.7	)
Residential mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations of government sponsored entities and agencies		99,703			122,937			(23,234	)		(18.9	)		63,682			89,151			(25,469	)		(28.6	)
Obligations of states and political subdivisions		605,636			686,376			(80,740	)		(11.8	)		850,498			601,128			249,370			41.5
Corporate debt securities		33,172			33,224			(52	)		(0.2	)		33,101			33,154			(53	)		(0.2	)
Total held-to-maturity debt securities		746,767			851,753			(104,986	)		(12.3	)		953,920			731,212			222,708			30.5
Total securities	$	2,805,207		$	3,257,654		$	(452,447	)		(13.9	)	$	3,954,174		$	2,722,395		$	1,231,779			45.2
Available-for-sale and equity securities:
Weighted average yield at the respective period end ⁽²⁾		2.28	%		2.67	%								1.55	%		2.09	%
As a % of total securities		73.4	%		73.9	%								75.9	%		73.1	%
Weighted average life (in years)		3.3			4.1									4.5			3.4
Held-to-maturity securities:
Weighted average yield at the respective period end ⁽²⁾		3.42	%		3.51	%								2.98	%		3.35	%
As a % of total securities		26.6	%		26.1	%								24.1	%		26.9	%
Weighted average life (in years)		3.7			3.8									5.6			3.8
Total securities:
Weighted average yield at the respective period end ⁽²⁾		2.60	%		2.89	%								1.90	%		2.43	%
As a % of total securities		100.0	%		100.0	%								100.0	%		100.0	%
Weighted average life (in years)		3.4			4.0									4.7			3.5

Total investment securities, which are a source of liquidity for Wesbanco as well as a contributor to interest income, ~~decreased $452.4 million~~increased $1.2 billion or ~~13.9%~~45.2% from December 31, ~~2019~~2020 to September 30, ~~2020,~~2021, and represented ~~16.9%~~23.4% of total assets at ~~period end.~~period-end as compared to 16.6% at December 31, 2020. Through the first nine months of ~~2020,~~2021, the available-for-sale portfolio ~~decreased $347.6 million~~increased $1.0 billion or ~~14.5%~~51.0%, primarily due to ~~the sale~~excess liquidity from stimulus deposits and increased calls of agency and municipal securities, funding $1.7 billion in purchases of residential mortgage-backed securities ~~at the end~~and collateralized mortgage obligations. Residential mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations totaled 59.6% of the ~~first quarter to take advantage of market opportunities and to free up cash for COVID-19 related needs, such as larger commercial or home equity line withdrawals, while the~~total investment portfolio at September 30, 2021. The held-to-maturity portfolio ~~decreased $105.0~~increased $222.7 million or ~~12.3%~~30.5% due to ~~calls~~$307.2 million in purchases of municipal ~~securities in the current lower rate environment.~~bonds. The weighted average yield of the portfolio decreased by 2953 basis points from ~~2.89%~~2.43% at December 31, ~~2019~~2020 to ~~2.60%~~1.90% at September 30, ~~2020,~~2021, due to ~~increased prepayment speeds on mortgage-backed securities~~prepayments and calls of legacy higher rate agency and municipal securities asand the previously mentioned purchases at lower current market ~~rates declined and stayed lower throughout 2020.~~ rates. Higher premium amortization was also a factor in the yield reduction.

Net unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities included in accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax, as of September 30, ~~2020~~2021 and December 31, ~~2019~~2020 were ~~$54.0~~$18.5 million and ~~$20.7~~$46.9 million, respectively. The net unrealized pre-tax gains represent temporary fluctuations resulting from changes in market rates in relation to fixed yields in the available-for-sale portfolio, and on an after tax-basis are accounted for as an adjustment to other comprehensive income in shareholders’ equity. Net unrealized pre-tax gains in the held-to-maturity portfolio, which are not accounted for in other comprehensive income, were ~~$35.6~~$24.6 million at September 30, ~~2020,~~2021, compared to ~~$22.8~~$37.0 million at December 31, ~~2019.~~2020. With approximately ~~27%~~24% of the investment portfolio in the held-to-maturity category, the recent volatility in interest rates does not have as much impact on other comprehensive income as if the entire portfolio were included in the available-for-sale category. The ~~increase~~decrease in unrealized gains from year-end ~~are~~is due to ~~the significant decrease~~an increase in market rates ~~and the shape of the yield curve throughout~~over the first nine months of ~~2020 resulting from COVID-19~~the year coupled with prepayments and ~~the federal funds rate decreases.~~calls of higher-rate securities, and purchases of securities at lower, current market rates.

Equity securities, of which a portion consist of investments in various mutual funds held in grantor trusts formed in connection with a key officer and director deferred compensation plan, are recorded at fair value. Gains and losses due to fair value fluctuations on equity securities are included in net securities gains or losses. For those equity securities relating to the key officer and director deferred compensation plan, the corresponding change in the obligation to the employee is recognized in employee benefits expense.

~~On January 1, 2020, Wesbanco adopted ASU 2016-13 (Topic 326),~~ ~~Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments~~. Upon adoption, the Company recognized $0.2 million to opening retained earnings, which represented the CECL allowance as of January 1, 2020. The corporate and municipal bonds in Wesbanco’s held-to-maturity debt portfolio are analyzed quarterly to determine if an allowance for current expected credit losses is warranted. Wesbanco uses a database of historical financials of all corporate and municipal issuers and actual historical default and recovery rates on rated and non-rated transactions to estimate expected credit losses on an individual security basis. The expected credit losses are adjusted quarterly and are recorded in an allowance for expected credit losses on the balance sheet, which is deducted from the amortized cost basis of the held-to-maturity portfolio as a contra asset. ~~The losses are recorded on the income statement in the provision for credit losses~~. Held-to-maturity investments in U.S. Government-sponsored entities and agencies as well as mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations, which are all either issued by a direct governmental entity or a government-sponsored entity, have no historical evidence supporting expected credit losses; therefore, Wesbanco has estimated these losses at zero, and will monitor this assumption in the future for any economic or governmental policies that could affect this assumption.

Wesbanco’s municipal portfolio represented ~~26.1%~~24.3% of the overall securities portfolio as of September 30, ~~2020~~2021 compared to ~~25.5%~~26.3% as of December 31, ~~2019,~~2020, and it carries different risks that are not as prevalent in other security types contained in the portfolio. The following table presents the allocation of the individual bonds in the municipal bond portfolio based on the combined ratings of two major bond credit rating agencies (at fair value):

	September 30, 2020				December 31, 2019				September 30, 2021				December 31, 2020
(unaudited, dollars in thousands)	Amount		% of Total		Amount		% of Total		Amount		% of Total		Amount		% of Total
Municipal bonds (at fair value) ⁽¹⁾:
Investment Grade - Prime	$	68,633		9.0	$	78,730		9.2	$	98,883		10.1	$	72,861		9.8
Investment Grade - High		518,949		68.3		569,085		66.7		723,701		73.8		511,013		68.4
Investment Grade - Upper Medium		162,006		21.3		190,696		22.4		150,439		15.3		152,704		20.4
Investment Grade - Lower Medium		3,082		0.4		3,042		0.4		3,006		0.3		3,072		0.4
Non-Investment Grade - Speculative		—		—		638		0.1		—		—		—		—
Not rated by either agency		7,762		1.0		10,011		1.2		4,196		0.5		7,354		1.0
Total municipal bond portfolio	$	760,432		100.0	$	852,202		100.0	$	980,225		100.0	$	747,004		100.0

Wesbanco’s municipal bond portfolio at September 30, ~~2020~~2021 consists of ~~$134.4~~$281.2 million of taxable ~~(primarily Build America Bonds)~~ and ~~$626.0~~$699.0 million of tax-exempt general obligation and revenue bonds. The following table presents additional information regarding the municipal bond type and issuer (at fair value):

	September 30, 2020				December 31, 2019				September 30, 2021				December 31, 2020
(unaudited, dollars in thousands)	Amount		% of Total		Amount		% of Total		Amount		% of Total		Amount		% of Total
Municipal bond type:
General Obligation	$	527,952		69.4	$	581,105		68.2	$	697,345		71.1	$	518,274		69.4
Revenue		232,480		30.6		271,097		31.8		282,880		28.9		228,730		30.6
Total municipal bond portfolio	$	760,432		100.0	$	852,202		100.0	$	980,225		100.0	$	747,004		100.0
Municipal bond issuer:
State Issued	$	46,704		6.1	$	76,228		8.9	$	42,522		4.3	$	46,843		6.3
Local Issued		713,728		93.9		775,974		91.1		937,703		95.7		700,161		93.7
Total municipal bond portfolio	$	760,432		100.0	$	852,202		100.0	$	980,225		100.0	$	747,004		100.0

Wesbanco’s municipal bond portfolio is broadly spread across the United States. The following table presents the top five states of municipal bond concentration based on total fair value at September 30, ~~2020:~~2021:

	September 30, 2020				September 30, 2021
(unaudited, dollars in thousands)	Fair Value		% of Total		Fair Value		% of Total
Pennsylvania	$	167,751		22.1	$	219,264		22.4
California						118,270		12.1
Ohio		94,773		12.5		104,631		10.7
Texas		64,321		8.5		69,767		7.1
Kentucky		40,734		5.4		38,893		4.0
Illinois		37,245		4.9
All other states		355,608		46.6		429,400		43.7
Total municipal bond portfolio	$	760,432		100.0	$	980,225		100.0

Wesbanco uses prices from independent pricing services and, to a lesser extent, indicative (non-binding) quotes from independent brokers, to measure the fair value of its securities. Wesbanco validates prices received from pricing services or brokers using a variety of methods, including, but not limited to, comparison to secondary pricing services, corroboration of pricing by reference to other independent market data such as secondary broker quotes and relevant benchmark indices, review of pricing by personnel familiar with market liquidity and other market-related conditions, review of pricing service methodologies, review of independent auditor reports received from the pricing service regarding its internal controls, and through review of inputs and assumptions used in pricing certain securities thinly traded or with limited observable data points. The procedures in place provide management with a sufficient understanding of the valuation models, assumptions, inputs and pricing to reasonably measure the fair

value of Wesbanco’s securities. For additional disclosure relating to fair value measurements, refer to Note 8,7, “Fair Value Measurement” in the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Loans represent Wesbanco’s single largest balance sheet asset classification and the largest source of interest income. Business purpose loans consist of CRE loans and other C&I loans that are not secured by real estate. CRE loans are further segmented into land and construction loans, and loans for improved property. Consumer purpose loans consist of residential real estate loans, home equity lines of credit and other consumer loans. Loans held for sale generally consist of residential real estate loans originated for sale in the secondary market, but at times may also include other types of loans. The outstanding balance of each major category of the loan portfolio is summarized in Table 10.

The risk that borrowers will be unable or unwilling to repay their obligations and default on loans is inherent in all lending activities. Credit risk arises from many sources including general economic conditions, external events that impact businesses or industries, isolated events that impact a major employer, individual loss of employment or other personal hardships as well as changes in interest rates or the value of collateral. Credit risk is also impacted by a concentration of exposure within a geographic market or to one or more borrowers, industries or collateral types. The primary goal in managing credit risk is to minimize the impact of default by an individual borrower or group of borrowers. Credit risk is managed through the initial underwriting process as well as through ongoing monitoring and administration of the portfolio that varies by the type of loan. The Bank’s credit policies establish standard underwriting guidelines for each type of loan and require an appropriate evaluation of the credit characteristics of each borrower. This evaluation includes the borrower’s primary source of repayment capacity; the adequacy of collateral, if any, to secure the loan; the potential value of personal guarantees as secondary sources of repayment; and other factors unique to each loan that may increase or mitigate its risk. Credit bureau scores are also considered when evaluating consumer purpose loans as well as guarantors of business purpose loans. However, the Bank does not periodically update credit bureau scores subsequent to when loans are made to determine changes in credit history.

Credit risk is mitigated for all types of loans by continuously monitoring delinquency levels and pursuing collection efforts at the earliest stage of delinquency. The Bank also monitors general economic conditions, including employment, housing activity and real estate values in its market. The Bank also periodically evaluates and changes its underwriting standards when warranted based on market conditions, the historical performance of a category of the portfolio, or other external factors. Credit risk is also regularly evaluated for the impact of adverse economic and other events, such as the current COVID-19 pandemic crisis, that increase the risk of default and the potential loss in the event of default, to understand the impact on the Bank’s earnings and capital.

Commercial loan risk grades are determined based on an evaluation of the relevant characteristics of each loan, assigned at inception and adjusted thereafter at any time to reflect changes in the risk profile throughout the life of each loan. The primary factors used to determine the risk grade are the sufficiency, reliability and sustainability of the primary source of repayment and overall financial strength of the borrower. The rating system more heavily weights the debt service coverage, leverage and loan-to-value factors to derive the risk grade. Other factors that are considered at a lesser weighting include management, industry or property-type risks, payment history, collateral and guarantees.

	September 30, 2020				December 31, 2019				September 30, 2021				December 31, 2020
(unaudited, dollars in thousands)	Amount		% of Loans		Amount		% of Loans		Amount		% of Loans		Amount		% of Loans
Commercial real estate:
Land and construction	$	690,547		6.2	$	777,151		7.5	$	824,199		8.3	$	668,277		6.1
Improved property		5,018,101		45.0		4,947,857		48.0		4,833,687		48.6		5,037,115		46.0
Total commercial real estate		5,708,648		51.2		5,725,008		55.5		5,657,886		56.9		5,705,392		52.1
Commercial and industrial		1,654,116		14.9		1,644,699		16.0		1,435,154		14.4		1,681,182		15.4
Commercial and industrial - PPP		853,119		7.7		—		-		272,060		2.7		726,256		6.6
Residential real estate		1,798,019		16.2		1,873,647		18.2		1,655,229		16.7		1,720,961		15.7
Home equity		647,052		5.8		649,678		6.3		607,735		6.1		646,387		5.9
Consumer		328,592		3.0		374,953		3.6		285,101		2.9		309,055		2.8
Total portfolio loans		10,989,546		98.8		10,267,985		99.6		9,913,165		99.7		10,789,233		98.5
Loans held for sale		134,151		1.2		43,013		0.4		32,308		0.3		168,378		1.5
Total loans	$	11,123,697		100.0	$	10,310,998		100.0	$	9,945,473		100.0	$	10,957,611		100.0

Total portfolio loans ~~increased $812.7~~decreased $876.1 million or ~~7.9%~~8.1% from December 31, ~~2019,~~2020, while ~~portfolio loans increased $3.2~~they decreased $1.1 billion or ~~41.7%~~9.8% over the last twelve months. Most of the loan ~~growth over the last twelve months~~decrease was due to the ~~acquisition~~forgiveness of ~~OLBK in November 2019, totaling $2.5 billion, as well as the origination of $853.1~~$939.7 million of PPP loans during the ~~second and third quarters~~last twelve months, of ~~2020.~~which $272.1 million remain in the portfolio as of September 30, 2021. Excluding PPP loans, ~~and the OLBK acquisition,~~ total portfolio loans decreased over the last twelve months by ~~1.0% as~~4.9% reflecting the higher than anticipated commercial real estate payoffs, continued low commercial line ~~usage decreased~~of credit utilization, and the impact of selling a higher percentage of ~~new~~1-to-4 family residential ~~loans originated were sold into~~mortgage originations in the secondary ~~market as opposed to holding them in the residential~~market. Consumer loan ~~portfolio and consumer loan~~ demand also decreased as a result of the pandemic reducing consumer spending. Slightly offsetting the total decrease was ~~4.9%~~19.4% of ~~organic~~ growth in the land and construction portfolio. This increase is due to $187.1 million of loan reclassifications out of commercial real ~~estate. Organic commercial~~estate in the third quarter of 2021. Commercial and industrial loans decreased ~~10.7%~~13.2%, due ~~primarily~~ to ~~the lower line usage mentioned above and~~ lower overall ~~demand. Organic residential~~demand and partially from certain reclassifications into commercial real estate. Residential real estate loans decreased ~~4.5%~~7.9% over the last twelve months, due to a greater portion of new originations sold into the secondary market and a greater portion of existing loans refinanced with other banks, while home equity loans experienced lower demand and were also refinanced into first mortgages due to customer preferences for fixed rate loans. Consumer loans declined due to pricing adjustments for indirect lending as well as refinancing or repayment of existing loans.

Total loan commitments of ~~$3.3~~$3.8 billion, including loans approved but not closed, increased ~~$12.0~~$553.2 million or ~~0.4%~~17.1% from December 31, ~~2019~~2020 due primarily to ~~an increase~~increases in ~~available~~availabilities under lines of ~~credit.~~credit, deposit overdrafts and contingent obligations. The line utilization percentage for the commercial portfolio was ~~35.4%~~37.0% at September 30, ~~2020~~2021 compared to ~~44.5%~~33.9% as of December 31, ~~2019.~~2020.

The commercial portfolio is monitored for potential concentrations of credit risk by market, type of lending, CRE property type, C&I and owner-occupied CRE by industry, investment CRE dependence on common tenants and industries or property types that are similarly impacted by external factors.

During the first quarter of 2020, Wesbanco sold $36.4 million of certain under-performing loans acquired from OLBK, which had a book value of $56.6 million. The majority of these loans settled by March 31, 2020; however, $8.9 million settled in April 2020, and therefore they were classified as loans held for sale as of March 31, 2020. Loans held for sale at both September 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020 are originated residential mortgages that are committed to be sold into the secondary market. Loans held for sale decreased by $136.1 million or 80.8% from December 31, 2020 due to additional staffing in the secondary mortgage operations area and a specific effort to accelerate the speed at which the loans are delivered to the investor, as well as more originations held in the loan portfolio in the third quarter.

Wesbanco has participated in the PPP loan program as originally established by the CARES Act. As of September 30, ~~2020,~~2021, the Company has funded nearly ~~7,200~~11,300 loans totaling ~~$853.1 million~~$1.2 billion to qualifying small businesses, non-profits and organizations throughout our six-state footprint. The loans carry an interest rate of 1%, are generally for a two-year or five-year maturity, and were originated with a percentage fee paid by the SBA directly to the Bank depending on the size of the loan originated. At September 30, ~~2020,~~2021, remaining ~~un-accreted~~unaccreted fees, net of deferred origination costs, were ~~$19.5~~$10.4 million. This total is comprised of $10.1 million remaining on the 2021 originated PPP loans and $0.3 million remaining on the 2020 originated PPP loans. The loans are subject to forgiveness by the SBA under certain defined circumstances, and it is anticipated a high percentage of such loans will meet such requirements (as revised) over the next ~~12-18 months, although no~~few quarters, with $825.4 million of 2020 originated PPP loans, ~~had~~or approximately 97% of 2020 PPP loan originations and $114.3 million, or approximately 31% of 2021 PPP loan originations, having been forgiven as of September 30, ~~2020.~~

September 30, 2020

Land and Construction

Improved Property

Commercial and Industrial

PPP

(unaudited, in thousands)

Balance

Commitment

Balance

Commitment

Balance

Commitment

Loan Balance

Total Loan Balance

Total
Exposure

% of
Capital (1)

Agriculture and farming

$
18,099

$
1,687

$
3,497

$
833

$
8,156

$
5,916

$
2,864

$
32,616

$
41,052

2.5

Energy

1,701

—

42,790

2,315

79,408

85,887

10,405

134,304

222,506

13.6

Construction

147,243

97,938

139,471

54,168

182,993

181,425

157,914

627,621

961,152

58.9

Manufacturing

276

4

86,013

8,991

155,076

120,440

76,087

317,452

446,887

27.4

Wholesale and distribution

158

42

44,936

1,830

121,917

57,269

32,554

199,565

258,706

15.8

Retail

2,558

1,172

254,760

7,108

94,838

88,738

41,793

393,949

490,967

30.1

Transportation and warehousing

12,217

5,768

64,738

2,165

39,986

16,295

22,422

139,363

163,591

10.0

Information and communications

65

121

4,062

—

8,089

8,002

4,566

16,782

24,905

1.5

Finance and insurance

216

—

11,300

3,421

91,018

120,425

12,179

114,713

238,559

14.6

Equipment leasing

1,003

108

13,231

275

50,809

36,439

12,973

78,016

114,838

7.0

Real estate - 1-4 family

5,685

3,671

308,441

9,291

76,625

4,025

—

390,751

407,738

25.0

Real estate - multi-family

191,998

158,816

565,921

9,232

2,221

1

—

760,140

928,189

56.8

Real estate - other retail

5,208

8,088

247,184

3,752

5,510

266

—

257,902

270,008

16.5

Real estate - shopping center

974

1,426

247,310

6,200

1,991

—

—

250,275

257,901

15.8

Real estate - office building

31,125

18,033

480,060

8,822

9,040

3,857

—

520,225

550,937

33.7

Real estate - commercial/manufacturing

1,897

2,553

361,678

12,729

10,754

1

—

374,329

389,612

23.9

Real estate - residential buildings

42,959

58,889

137,483

16,076

30,603

12,998

9,395

220,440

308,403

18.9

Real estate - other

69,244

31,050

450,086

29,109

52,173

24,950

7,467

578,970

664,079

40.7

Services

14,875

2,498

200,561

5,481

164,478

111,248

134,208

514,122

633,349

38.8

Schools and education services

18,939

5,081

24,052

539

91,321

15,850

11,640

145,952

167,422

10.3

Healthcare

48,909

59,441

327,433

5,798

116,624

61,932

86,621

579,587

706,758

43.3

Entertainment and recreation

1,294

1,225

50,508

1,530

14,066

4,113

9,103

74,971

81,839

5.0

Hotels

32,309

22,160

689,436

14,750

5,111

542

12,820

739,676

777,128

47.6

Other accommodations

186

511

56,219

315

4,122

390

566

61,093

62,309

3.8

Restaurants

1,537

—

95,870

1,772

66,999

22,683

45,356

209,762

234,217

14.3

Religious organizations

1,420

1,450

82,354

1,476

45,195

21,379

9,349

138,318

162,623

10.0

Government

34,163

2,800

17,366

642

121,772

35,348

5,640

178,941

217,731

13.3

Unclassified

4,289

65,109

11,341

91,130

3,221

74,391

147,197

166,048

396,678

24.3

Total commercial loans

$
690,547

$
549,641

$
5,018,101

$
299,750

$
1,654,116

$
1,114,810

$
853,119

$
8,215,883

$
10,180,084

623.4

September 30, 2020

Land and Construction

Improved Property

Commercial and Industrial

Percent Modified

(unaudited, in thousands)

Balance

Commitment

Balance

Commitment

Balance

Commitment

Total Loan Balance

Total
Exposure

Balance

Exposure

Agriculture and farming

$
—

$
—

$
—

$
—

$
—

$
—

$
—

$
—

0.0%

0.0%

Energy

—

—

—

—

2,408

—

2,408

2,408

1.8%

1.1%

Construction

7,264

989

—

—

78

—

7,342

8,331

1.2%

0.9%

Manufacturing

—

—

458

—

451

—

909

909

0.3%

0.2%

Wholesale and distribution

—

—

885

—

415

—

1,300

1,300

0.7%

0.5%

Retail

—

—

18,933

—

2,470

—

21,403

21,403

5.4%

4.4%

Transportation and warehousing

—

—

54

—

623

—

677

677

0.5%

0.4%

Information and communications

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

0.0%

0.0%

Finance and insurance

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

0.0%

0.0%

Equipment leasing

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

0.0%

0.0%

Real estate - 1-4 family

—

—

32,306

—

3,051

—

35,357

35,357

9.0%

8.7%

Real estate - multi-family

—

—

16,696

—

—

—

16,696

16,696

2.2%

1.8%

Real estate - other retail

—

—

27,350

—

4,665

—

32,015

32,015

12.4%

11.9%

Real estate - shopping center

—

—

44,853

—

—

—

44,853

44,853

17.9%

17.4%

Real estate - office building

—

—

25,221

375

—

—

25,221

25,596

4.8%

4.6%

Real estate - commercial/manufacturing

—

—

41,062

10

—

—

41,062

41,072

11.0%

10.5%

Real estate - residential buildings

—

—

7,154

—

355

—

7,509

7,509

3.4%

2.4%

Real estate - other

559

—

31,235

1,570

—

—

31,794

33,364

5.5%

5.0%

Services

—

—

7,404

—

2,073

6

9,477

9,483

1.8%

1.5%

Schools and education services

—

—

307

—

3

—

310

310

0.2%

0.2%

Healthcare

50

—

13,688

—

49

—

13,787

13,787

2.4%

2.0%

Entertainment and recreation

—

—

9,758

—

325

—

10,083

10,083

13.4%

12.3%

Hotels

12,702

705

296,868

4,640

17

—

309,587

314,932

41.9%

40.5%

Other accommodations

—

—

40,605

33

—

—

40,605

40,638

66.5%

65.2%

Restaurants

680

—

6,002

—

2,627

—

9,309

9,309

4.4%

4.0%

Religious organizations

—

—

580

—

—

—

580

580

0.4%

0.4%

Government

—

—

836

249

24

—

860

1,109

0.5%

0.5%

Unclassified

—

—

941

—

—

—

941

941

0.6%

0.2%

Total modified commercial loans

$
21,255

$
1,694

$
623,196

$
6,877

$
19,634

$
6

$
664,085

$
672,662

8.1%

6.6%

Under the CARES Act, Wesbanco ~~has~~ modified approximately 3,550 loans totaling $2.2 billion in 2020, of which ~~$0.7 billion,~~a total of $132.8 million of commercial loans, representing ~~6.0%~~1.3% of total portfolio loans or 8.1% of total commercial loans, are currently in their deferral period as of September 30, 2020. Wesbanco offered three months deferral of principal and interest and then three additional months of principal only, three months deferral of interest, three months deferral of principal and interest, and three months deferral of principal depending on the type of loan and industry sector, primarily for commercial borrowers. As of October 16, 2020, modified loans remaining in forbearance declined to 4.9% of total portfolio loans.

All of the real estate sectors combined represent the largest industry exposure at $3.8 billion, of which multi-family, office buildings and 1-4 families are the largest categories within real estate. Multi-family makes up $928.2 million or 56.8% of total risk-based capital, office buildings are $550.9 million or 33.7% of total risk-based capital and 1-4 families are $407.7 million or 25.0% of total risk-based capital. For loan modifications as allowed under the CARES Act, $236.5 million or 14.5% of total risk-based capital of real estate sector loans wereremain in deferral as of September 30, ~~2020.~~

~~The construction sectors combined represent~~2021. An additional $97.9 million of commercial loans had various payment terms modified in exchange for enhancements beneficial to the ~~second largest industry exposure at $961.2 million~~Bank which were permanent improvements to the credit facility. Changes include an increase in floor rates, increase in guarantors and duration of guarantees and a change in covenants. None of the aforementioned loans were considered delinquent or ~~58.9% of risk-based capital. For loan modifications allowed under the CARES Act, there were $8.3 million or 0.5% of total risk-based capital of construction loans in deferral~~on non-accrual status as of September 30, ~~2020.~~

The hotel sector represents the third largest industry exposure at $777.1 million or 47.6% of risk-based capital. For loan modifications allowed under the CARES Act, there were $314.9 million or 19.3% of total risk-based capital of hotel loans in deferral as of September 30, 2020. The majority of these loans were deferred for three months of principal and interest with three additional months of principal.

Healthcare represents the fourth largest industry exposure at $706.8 million or 43.3% of total risk-based capital. For loan modifications allowed under the CARES Act, there were $13.8 million or 0.8% of total risk-based capital of healthcare loans in deferral as of September 30, 2020.

~~TABLE 13. COMMERCIAL LOANS MODIFIED UNDER CARES ACT BY MODIFICATION TYPE~~2021.

Non-performing assets consist of non-accrual loans and TDRs, other real estate acquired through or in lieu of foreclosure, bank premises held for sale, and repossessed automobiles acquired to satisfy defaulted consumer loans.

(unaudited, dollars in thousands)	September 30, 2020			December 31, 2019			September 30, 2021			December 31, 2020
Non-accrual loans:
Commercial real estate - land and construction	$	997		$	580		$	145		$	469
Commercial real estate - improved property		10,410			6,815			7,572			9,494
Commercial and industrial		2,716			14,313			5,350			3,302
Residential real estate		17,492			16,867			17,643			17,925
Home equity		5,327			5,903			5,061			5,345
Consumer		324			435			488			345
Total non-accrual loans ⁽¹⁾		37,266			44,913			36,259			36,880
TDRs accruing interest:
Commercial real estate - land and construction		—			—			—			—
Commercial real estate - improved property		667			1,321			382			655
Commercial and industrial		116			191			23			111
Residential real estate		3,027			3,477			3,012			2,779
Home equity		354			411			260			363
Consumer		27			31			30			19
Total TDRs accruing interest ⁽¹⁾		4,191			5,431			3,707			3,927
Total non-performing loans	$	41,457		$	50,344		$	39,966		$	40,807
Other real estate owned and repossessed assets		738			4,178			293			549
Total non-performing assets	$	42,195		$	54,522		$	40,259		$	41,356
Non-performing loans/total portfolio loans		0.38	%		0.49	%		0.40	%		0.38	%
Non-performing assets/total assets		0.26	%		0.35	%		0.24	%		0.25	%
Non-performing assets/total portfolio loans, other real estate and repossessed assets		0.38	%		0.53	%		0.41	%		0.38	%

Non-performing loans, which consist of non-accrual loans and TDRs, decreased ~~$8.9~~$0.8 million or ~~17.7%~~2.1%, from December 31, ~~2019, primarily due to one $10.8 million non-accrual relationship that was paid off in the first quarter of~~ 2020. ~~TDRs~~Non-accrual balances have ~~remained constant~~decreased $0.6 million and accruing TDR balance decreased $0.2 million from December 31, ~~2019~~2020 to September 30, ~~2020.~~2021. (Please see the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional discussion.)

Section 4013 of the CARES Act allows financial institutions the option to temporarily suspend certain requirements under U.S. GAAP related to TDRs for a limited period of time during the COVID-19 pandemic. These customers must meet certain criteria, such as they were in good standing and not more than 30 days past due as of December 31, 2019, as well as other requirements. Based on this guidance, Wesbanco ~~does~~did not classify the COVID-19 loan modifications as TDRs, nor are the customers considered past due with regards to their delayed payments. Upon exiting the loan modification deferral program, the measurement of loan delinquency will resume where it left off upon entry into the program. ~~As of~~Through September 30, ~~2020,~~2021, Wesbanco has offered ~~three to six months of~~various deferred ~~payments~~payment schedules to commercial and retail customers impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic, depending on the type of loan and the industry-type for commercial loans.

Other real estate owned and repossessed assets decreased ~~$3.4~~to $0.3 million from December 31, ~~2019 primarily due to~~2020. At September 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, formal foreclosure proceedings were in process on residential real estate loans totaling $1.9 million and $1.8 million at each period, respectively. As a result of provisions of the ~~disposition~~CARES Act, certain residential real estate loans are temporarily suspended from entering foreclosure proceedings. The balance of ~~one commercial property in the first quarter of~~these loans totaled $3.6 million and $2.3 million at September 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, ~~as well as continued efforts to liquidate residential properties.~~respectively.

The following table presents past due and accruing loans excluding non-accrual and TDRs:

(unaudited, dollars in thousands)	September 30, 2020			December 31, 2019			September 30, 2021			December 31, 2020
Loans past due 90 days or more:
Commercial real estate - land and construction	$	572		$	26		$	1,256		$	288
Commercial real estate - improved property		896			4,709			2,308			2,713
Commercial and industrial		1,882			1,793			4,781			1,899
Residential real estate		5,491			3,643			1,746			2,863
Home equity		937			985			851			706
Consumer		392			457			310			377
Total loans past due 90 days or more		10,170			11,613			11,252			8,846
Loans past due 30 to 89 days:
Commercial real estate - land and construction		961			650			1,731			2,858
Commercial real estate - improved property		3,874			15,256			10,494			8,948
Commercial and industrial		2,776			5,312			9,356			6,540
Residential real estate		4,729			8,183			4,980			7,490
Home equity		2,855			3,558			3,055			2,754
Consumer		2,143			3,371			3,066			3,006
Total loans past due 30 to 89 days		17,338			36,330			32,682			31,596
Total loans 30 days or more past due	$	27,508		$	47,943		$	43,934		$	40,442
Loans past due 90 days or more and accruing to total portfolio loans		0.09	%		0.11	%		0.11	%		0.08	%
Loans past due 30-89 days and accruing to total portfolio loans		0.16	%		0.35	%		0.33	%		0.29	%

Loans past due 30 days or more and accruing interest, excluding non-accruals and TDRs, ~~decreased $20.4~~increased $3.5 million or ~~42.6%~~8.6% from December 31, ~~2019.~~2020. These loans continue to accrue interest because they are both well-secured and in the process of collection. Loans 90 days or more past due ~~decreased $1.4~~increased $2.4 million and represented ~~0.09%~~0.11% and 0.08% of total portfolio loans at September 30, ~~2020 compared to 0.11% at~~2021 and December 31, ~~2019. While decreasing overall, loans~~2020, respectively. Loans 90 days past due increased in the ~~residential real estate~~commercial and industrial category ~~and these loans are secured by underlying real estate. The decrease in the 30 to 89 days past due status was primarily~~ due to ~~the renewals of OLBK acquired commercial lines of credit that were being adjusted to WesBanco’s underwriting standards.~~one $3.2 million loan. The 30 – 89 days past due category represented ~~0.16%~~0.33% of total loans at September 30, ~~2020~~2021 and ~~0.35%~~0.29% at December 31, ~~2019.~~2020. Loans currently modified as permitted by the regulatory authorities and the CARES Act are not included in Tables 1413 or ~~15,~~14, as they are not considered ~~non-performing TDRs, or~~ past due.

On January 1, 2020, Wesbanco adopted CECL, which resulted in a $41.4 million increase to the allowance for credit losses. Of the $41.4 million, $38.4 million related to the loan portfolio and $3.0 million relate to loan commitments. The effect on retained earnings (tax-effected) was $26.6 million.

As of September 30, ~~2020,~~2021, the total allowance for credit losses – loans and commitments was ~~$195.9~~$143.9 million, of which ~~$185.1~~$136.6 million ~~relates~~related to loans and ~~$10.8~~$7.3 million ~~relates~~related to loan commitments. The allowance for credit losses – loans ~~is 1.68%~~was 1.38% of total portfolio loans as of September 30, ~~2020~~2021, compared to ~~0.51%~~1.72% as of December 31, ~~2019, when the allowance for loan losses (prior to the adoption of CECL) was $52.4 million.~~2020. Excluding PPP loans of ~~$853.1~~$272.1 million, the allowance for credit losses – loans ~~is 1.83%~~was 1.42% of total portfolio ~~loans.~~loans as of September 30, 2021, as compared to 1.85% of total portfolio loans at December 31, 2020. As per regulatory guidance, there is no calculated allowance on PPP loans due to their government guarantees by the SBA.

The allowance for credit losses - loans individually-evaluated increased ~~$5.8~~$11.0 million from December 31, ~~2019~~2020 to September 30, ~~2020 due~~2021. The population of individually-evaluated loans consisted of eight hotel loans, with a total loan balance of $37.1 million. These loans were moved to ~~PCD loans acquired from~~individually-evaluated in the ~~OLBK acquisition.~~third quarter of 2021. The allowance for loans collectively-evaluated ~~increased~~decreased from December 31, ~~2019~~2020 to September 30, ~~2020~~2021 by ~~$126.9 million, which includes $31.7 million related to the adoption of CECL as of January 1, 2020.~~$60.2 million.

The allowance for credit losses - loan commitments was ~~$10.8~~$7.3 million at September 30, ~~2020~~2021 as compared to ~~$0.9~~$9.5 million as of December 31, ~~2019,~~2020, and is included in other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. ~~The allowance for credit losses - loan commitments includes a $3.0 million adjustment related to the adoption of CECL as of January 1, 2020.~~

The allowance for credit losses by loan category, presented in Note 5,4, “Loans and the Allowance for Credit Losses” of the Consolidated Financial Statements, summarizes the impact of changes in various factors that affect the allowance for loan losses in each segment of the portfolio. The allowance for credit losses under CECL is calculated utilizing the PD/LGD, which is then ~~discounted.~~discounted to net present value. PD is the probability the asset will default within a given time frame and LGD is the percentage of the asset not expected to be collected due to ~~default to net present value.~~default. The primary macroeconomic drivers of the quantitative model include forecasts of national unemployment and interest rates, as well as modeling adjustments for changes in prepayment speeds, loan risk grades, portfolio mix, concentrations and loan growth. For the calculation as of September 30, ~~2020,~~2021, the forecast was based upon a blend of two nationally-recognized published economic forecasts through September 30, ~~2020,~~2021, and iswas primarily driven by national unemployment and interest rate spread forecasts. At quarter-end, national unemployment was projected to peak at ~~8.4%~~4.7%, and subsequently decrease to an average of ~~7.6%~~4.0% over the remainder of the forecast period. The resurgence in leisure travel continued through September 30, 2021, which led to improvements in debt service coverage and revenue per available room (“RevPAR”) across the hotel portfolio. The improvement in the macroeconomic factors and COVID qualitative factors, including those specifically for the hospitality portfolio, caused the allowance to decrease ~~slightly~~ from ~~June 30,~~December 31, 2020 to September 30, 2020, however qualitative factors were added to account for the remaining credit risk related to the continuing pandemic, deferred interest on modified loans and certain industry concentrations, along with other qualitative factors, resulting in an increase of $16.6 million from June 30, 2020.2021, by $51.4 million.

If forecasted projections of national unemployment remain consistent with the forecast utilized by Wesbanco as of September 30, ~~2020~~2021 throughout the rest of the year, this may result in additional, but less significant, future quarterly ~~increases~~decreases in the allowance for credit losses, ~~assuming~~depending upon other model variables ~~remain relatively constant.~~such as qualitative factors specifically for hotels and the COVID-19 pandemic.

Criticized and classified loans were ~~3.25%~~4.2% of total portfolio loans, ~~increasing~~decreasing from ~~2.17%~~4.6% at December 31, ~~2019.~~2020. Criticized and classified loans ~~increased $134.4~~decreased $77.6 million from December 31, ~~2019~~2020 to ~~$356.9~~$417.3 million at September 30, ~~2020,~~2021, primarily due to ~~revisions in~~upgrades on certain hospitality loans. See Footnote 4, “Loans and the internal loan grading system to better reflect the credit quality of commercial loans. In the third quarter of 2020, there were $79.5 million in downgrades to criticized loans within CRE, primarily in the hospitality industry, but the largest creditAllowance for ~~$13.9 million in the nursing home industry is in LCD.~~Credit Losses” for more information.

Table 1613 summarizes the allocation of the allowance for credit losses to each category of the loan portfolio. The overall allowance for loans increased due the adoption of CECL. Additionally, the allowance for credit losses on LCD loan commitments has increased to $10.8 million as of September 30, 2020 driven by seven new un-advanced credits in 2020 for approximately $121.1 million.

TABLE ~~16.~~13. ALLOCATION OF THE ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES – LOANS AND LOAN COMMITMENTS

(unaudited, dollars in thousands)	September 30, 2020		Percent of Total		December 31, 2019		Percent of Total		September 30, 2021		Percent of Total		December 31, 2020		Percent of Total
Allowance for credit losses - loans:
Commercial real estate - land and construction	$	13,055		6.7	$	4,949		9.3	$	7,264		5.0	$	10,841		5.6
Commercial real estate - improved property		105,966		54.1		20,293		38.1		81,601		56.7		110,652		56.6
Commercial and industrial		43,648		22.3		14,116		26.5		27,201		18.9		37,850		19.4
Residential real estate		12,018		6.1		4,311		8.1		14,413		10.0		17,851		9.1
Home equity		2,076		1.1		4,422		8.3		699		0.5		1,487		0.8
Consumer		7,004		3.6		2,951		5.5		3,747		2.6		6,507		3.3
Deposit account overdrafts		1,342		0.7		1,387		2.6		1,680		1.2		639		0.3
Total allowance for credit losses - loans	$	185,109		94.6	$	52,429		98.4	$	136,605		94.9	$	185,827		95.1
Allowance for credit losses - loan commitments:
Commercial real estate - land and construction	$	8,725		4.4	$	235		0.4	$	3,679		2.7	$	6,508		3.3
Commercial real estate - improved property		—		0.0		22		0.0		318		0.2		712		0.4
Commercial and industrial		1,440		0.7		311		0.6		1,726		1.2		1,275		0.7
Residential real estate		594		0.3		15		0.0		1,209		0.8		955		0.5
Home equity		67		0.0		250		0.5		52		0.0		45		0.0
Consumer		3		0.0		41		0.1		306		0.2		19		0.0
Total allowance for credit losses - loan commitments		10,829		5.4		874		1.6		7,290		5.1		9,514		4.9
Total allowance for credit losses - loans and loan commitments	$	195,938		100.0	$	53,303		100.0	$	143,895		100.0	$	195,341		100.0

Although the allowance for credit losses is allocated as described in Table ~~16,~~13, the total allowance is available to absorb actual losses in any category of the loan portfolio. However, differences between management’s estimation of probable losses and actual ~~incurred losses~~net charge-offs in subsequent periods for any category may necessitate future adjustments to the allowance for credit losses applicable to the category. Management believes the allowance for credit losses is appropriate to absorb expected losses at September 30, ~~2020.~~2021.

(unaudited, dollars in thousands)	September 30, 2020		December 31, 2019		$ Change			% Change			September 30, 2021		December 31, 2020		$ Change			% Change
Deposits
Non-interest bearing demand	$	4,073,305	$	3,178,270	$	895,035			28.2		$	4,531,958	$	4,070,835	$	461,123			11.3
Interest bearing demand		2,633,601		2,316,855		316,746			13.7			3,283,444		2,839,536		443,908			15.6
Money market		1,619,410		1,518,314		101,096			6.7			1,765,480		1,685,927		79,553			4.7
Savings deposits		2,167,597		1,934,647		232,950			12.0			2,488,180		2,214,565		273,615			12.4
Certificates of deposit		1,707,512		2,055,920		(348,408	)		(16.9	)		1,354,252		1,618,510		(264,258	)		(16.3	)
Total deposits	$	12,201,425	$	11,004,006	$	1,197,419			10.9		$	13,423,314	$	12,429,373	$	993,941			8.0

Deposits, which represent Wesbanco’s primary source of funds, are offered in various account forms at various rates through Wesbanco’s ~~235~~206 financial centers. The FDIC insures deposits up to $250,000 per account. ~~The CARES Act provided the authorization to the FDIC to allow for a temporary increase in the insured limit through December 31, 2020, which has not yet been adopted.~~

Total deposits increased by ~~$1.2 billion~~$993.9 million or ~~10.9%~~8.0% during the first nine months of ~~2020. Non-interest~~2021. Interest bearing demand deposits, ~~interest~~savings deposits, non-interest bearing demand ~~deposits, savings~~ deposits, and money market deposits increased ~~28.2%~~15.6%, ~~13.7%~~12.4%, ~~12.0%~~11.3%, and ~~6.7%~~4.7%, respectively. The growth in transaction-based accounts is primarily attributable to the OLBK acquisition, marketing, customer incentives, focused retail and business strategies to obtain more account relationships and customers’ preferences for shorter-term maturities. The transaction-based accounts increased towards the end of the first quarter and into the second quarter from the CARES Act individual and family stimulus payments, as well as deposits from small businesses obtaining loans from the PPP program, ~~along with higher savings rates~~focused retail and ~~lower~~business strategies to obtain more account relationships and customers’ overall ~~consumer spending.~~preferences for shorter-term maturities. Deposit balances were also impacted by bonus and royalty payments for Marcellus and Utica shale gas payments from energy companies in Wesbanco’s southwestern Pennsylvania, eastern Ohio and northern West Virginia markets. Money market deposits were influenced through Wesbanco’s participation in the Insured Cash Sweep (ICS®) money market deposit program. ICS® reciprocal balances totaled ~~$375.6~~$647.3 million at September 30, ~~2020~~2021 compared to ~~$232.2~~$513.9 million at December 31, ~~2019.~~2020.

Certificates of deposit decreased ~~$348.4~~$264.3 million from December 31, 2020 to September 30, 2021 due primarily to the effects of an overall corporate strategy designed to increase and remix retail deposit relationships and reduce single-service customers with a focus on overall products that can be offered at a lower cost to Wesbanco. The decline was also impacted by customer run-off of higher cost certificates of deposit from the OLBK acquisition and customer ~~preference~~preferences for ~~other~~transaction account ~~types in the current lower interest rate environment.~~types. Wesbanco does not generally solicit brokered or other deposits out-of-market or over the internet, but does participate in the Certificate of Deposit Account Registry Services (CDARS®) program. CDARS® balances totaled ~~$46.5~~$45.9 million in outstanding balances at September 30, ~~2020, of which $3.0 million represented one-way buys,~~2021, compared to ~~$73.3~~$42.6 million in total outstanding balances at December 31, ~~2019, of which $11.8 million represented one-way buys.~~2020. Certificates of deposit greater than $250,000 were approximately ~~$404.7~~$329.6 million at September 30, ~~2020~~2021 compared to ~~$524.2~~$381.7 million at December 31, ~~2019.~~2020. Certificates of deposit of $100,000 or more were approximately ~~$900.4~~$701.9 million at September 30, ~~2020~~2021 compared to ~~$1.2 billion~~$843.2 million at December 31, ~~2019.~~2020. Certificates of deposit totaling approximately ~~$1.1 billion~~$893.7 million at September 30, ~~2020~~2021 with a cost of ~~1.03%~~0.50% are scheduled to mature within the next 12 months. Wesbanco intends to continue to focus on its core deposit strategies and improving its overall mix of transaction accounts to total deposits. From time to time, the Bank may offer special promotions or match competitor rates on certain certificates of deposit maturities and savings products based on competition, sales strategies, liquidity needs and wholesale borrowing costs.

(unaudited, dollars in thousands)	September 30, 2020		December 31, 2019		$ Change			% Change			September 30, 2021		December 31, 2020		$ Change			% Change
Federal Home Loan Bank Borrowings	$	794,621	$	1,415,615	$	(620,994	)		(43.9	)	$	208,940	$	549,003	$	(340,063	)		(61.9	)
Other short-term borrowings		381,909		282,362		99,547			35.3			152,546		241,950		(89,404	)		(37.0	)
Subordinated debt and junior subordinated debt		192,150		199,869		(7,719	)		(3.9	)		167,711		192,291		(24,580	)		(12.8	)
Total	$	1,368,680	$	1,897,846	$	(529,166	)		(27.9	)	$	529,197	$	983,244	$	(454,047	)		(46.2	)

While borrowings are a significant source of funding for Wesbanco, they are less significant as compared to total deposits. During the first nine months of ~~2020,~~2021, $340.1 million in available liquidity was used for FHLB borrowings ~~decreased $621.0 million, as $1.1 billion in~~ maturities and other principal ~~pay downs offset $475.0 million in new advances. The average cost during the first nine months of 2020 of maturing and paid-off FHLB borrowings was 1.99%, compared to the~~pay-downs with an average cost of ~~1.38% for~~2.40%. There were no new FHLB advances during the period.

Other short-term borrowings, which may consist of federal funds purchased, callable repurchase agreements, overnight sweep checking accounts, and borrowings on a revolving line of credit, were ~~$381.9~~$152.5 million at September 30, ~~2020~~2021 compared to ~~$282.4~~$242.0 million at December 31, ~~2019.~~2020. The ~~increase~~decrease in these borrowings is primarily due to ~~a $61.3~~an $89.4 million ~~increase in overnight sweep checking accounts, coupled with a $45.8 million increase~~decrease in callable repurchase agreements ~~which were partially offset by a $7.5 million~~and overnight sweep checking accounts. The decrease in callable repurchase agreements is due to moving certain customer relationships to interest-bearing demand deposits. There were no outstanding federal funds ~~purchased.~~purchased at either September 30, 2021 or December 31, 2020.

Subordinated debt and junior subordinated debt ~~were $192.2~~balances decreased by $24.6 million ~~at September 30,~~or 12.8% from the third quarter of 2020 ~~compared~~ to ~~$199.9 million at December 31, 2019. The~~the third quarter of 2021. This decrease is ~~primarily a result~~due specifically to the early redemption of the ~~redemption of $6.7 million in junior~~Your Community Bank (“YCB”) subordinated debt ~~during the first six months of 2020, assumed~~ in the ~~Old Line acquisition.~~middle of September. In addition, it was previously announced that Wesbanco will be redeeming the $35.0 million OLBK subordinated debt in the fourth quarter of 2021.

Wesbanco renewed a revolving line of credit in August ~~2020,~~2021, which is a senior obligation of the parent company, with another financial institution. This line of credit, which accrues interest at an adjusted LIBOR rate, provides for aggregate unsecured borrowings of up to $30.0 million. There were no outstanding balances at either September 30, ~~2020~~2021 or December 31, ~~2019.~~2020.

Wesbanco enters into financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit, letters of credit, loans approved but not closed, overdraft limits and contingent obligations to purchase loans funded by other entities. Since many of these commitments expire unused or partially used, these commitments may not reflect future cash requirements. Please refer to Note ~~11,~~10, “Commitments and Contingent Liabilities,” of the Consolidated Financial Statements and the “Loans and Credit Risk” section of this MD&A for additional information.

The allowance for credit losses includes an allowance for unfunded loan commitments. The allowance for credit losses represents the lifetime expected losses for all loans and unfunded loan commitments at the initial recognition date. The allowance incorporates forward-looking information and applies a reversion methodology beyond the reasonable and supportable forecast. The allowance is increased by a provision charged to operating expense and reduced by charge-offs, net of recoveries, which also includes any necessary adjustments to the reserve for unfunded loan commitments, and such reserve is accounted for in other liabilities. Management evaluates the appropriateness of the allowance at least quarterly. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires material estimates that may be susceptible to significant change from period to period.

During the first quarter of 2020, Wesbanco extended its contract with its existing core service provider for an additional seven years, which includes upgraded and enhanced technological services. The new contract also includes additional products and services, which were previously obtained from various other third-party service providers. It is currently anticipated that such core services will begin to be converted later this year, through next summer, and that any one-time charges from various contract terminations will be accounted for as of the date of the termination of any such associated contract. In addition to upgrading and enhancing the Company’s technology, reflecting the current operating environment and increased utilization of digital services, Wesbanco announced, on August 27, 2020, a plan to accelerate its financial center optimization strategy. This plan consolidates a total of 25 existing locations and converts two others to drive-up only locations across Indiana, Kentucky, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and West Virginia. One location closed during the last week of September, two others are slated for closure during the fourth quarter of 2020, and the remainder will close on or about January 22, 2021. Cost savings of approximately $6.0 to $6.5 million are expected to be phased-in during the first half of 2021. During the next few quarters, including the third quarter of 2020, Wesbanco anticipates incurring total charges of approximately $3.5 to $4.0 million due to the disposition of assets, lease terminations, severance and other costs associated with the closures, of which $3.0 million was incurred during the third quarter of 2020. Staff at the locations being consolidated will be given the opportunity to fill certain open positions at other nearby financial centers.

Shareholders' equity ~~increased $139.0~~decreased $32.8 million or ~~5.4%~~1.2% from ~~$2.6~~$2.8 billion at December 31, ~~2019. During the third quarter, Wesbanco issued 6.0 million depositary shares, each representing 1/40~~^th interest in a share of Wesbanco’s 6.75% fixed rate reset non-cumulative perpetual Series A preferred stock with a liquidation preference of $1,000 per share in a registered public offering to both retail and institutional investors. Net proceeds2020. The decrease resulted from the ~~transaction after underwriting discounts~~repurchase of common shares totaling $128.0 million, the declaration of common and ~~offering costs were approximately $144.5~~preferred shareholder dividends totaling $65.1 million and ~~are available to support Wesbanco’s obligations including payments related to outstanding indebtedness, to support~~$7.6 million, respectively, and a $26.9 million other comprehensive loss for the ~~capital needs of the company and the bank, and for other general corporate purposes. Additionally, shareholders’ equity was positively impacted by~~nine months ended September 30, 2021 exceeding net income during the current nine-month period of $69.2 million and a $37.1 million other comprehensive income gain. Such factors were partially offset by the retained earnings effect of the January 1, 2020 CECL adoption totaling $26.6 million, the repurchase of common shares and restricted stock vesting activity totaling $25.3 million, and the declaration of common shareholder dividends totaling $64.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2020.$188.1 million. Wesbanco also increased its quarterly dividend rate $0.01 per quarter to ~~$0.32~~$0.33 per share in February, representing a ~~3.2%~~3.1% increase over the prior quarterly rate and a cumulative ~~129%~~136% increase since 2010.

Wesbanco purchased ~~in the first quarter 786,010~~3,643,656 shares of its common stock on the open market at a total cost of ~~$25.0~~$128.0 million, or ~~$31.77~~$35.13 per share during the nine-month period ended September 30, 2021 under ~~the~~ current share repurchase authorizations. The Board of Directors approved an additional stock repurchase plan for the purchase of up to 3.2 million shares on August 26, 2021, which was in addition to prior plans ~~before suspending~~that were utilized during the ~~share buyback program in early March, in an abundance of caution related to the growing COVID-19 pandemic.~~quarter. At September 30, ~~2020,~~2021, the remaining shares authorized to be purchased under the ~~current~~last approved repurchase ~~plans~~plan totaled ~~1,704,457~~2,960,801 shares.

In February ~~2020,~~2021, Wesbanco granted 12,000 Total Shareholder Return Plan (“TSR”) shares for the performance period beginning January 1, ~~2020~~2021 and ending December 31, ~~2022~~2023 to certain executives. The award is determined at the end of the three-year period if the TSR of Wesbanco common stock is equal to or greater than the 50^th percentile of the TSR of the peer group. The number of shares to be earned by the participant shall be 200% of the grant-date award if the TSR of Wesbanco common stock is equal to or greater than the 75^th percentile of the TSR of the peer group. Upon achieving the market-based metric, shares determined to be earned by the participant become time-based and vest in three equal annual installments.

On May ~~26, 2020,~~19, 2021, Wesbanco granted ~~142,600~~147,200 stock options to selected officers at an exercise price of ~~$21.55.~~$38.78. These options are service-based and vest 50% at ~~December 31, 2020~~May 19, 2022 and 50% at December 31, ~~2021.~~2022. On the same date, Wesbanco ~~also~~ issued ~~169,291~~122,656 shares of time-based restricted stock to selected officers and ~~30,298~~directors and 17,571 shares of performance-based restricted stock to selected officers. The time-based restricted shares are service-based and cliff-vest 36 months from the date of grant. The performance-based restricted shares have a three-year performance period beginning on January 1, ~~2021,~~2022, based on Wesbanco’s return on average assets and return on average tangible common equity measured for each year, compared to a national ~~peer group~~set of peer financial institutions.

On June 24, 2021, Wesbanco issued an additional 6,165 shares of time-based restricted stock to directors. These time-based restricted shares are service-based and cliff-vest 36 months from the date of grant.

Regulatory guidelines require bank holding companies and commercial banks to maintain certain minimum capital ratios and define companies as “well capitalized” that sufficiently exceed the minimum ratios. At September 30, ~~2020,~~2021, regulatory capital levels for both the Bank and Wesbanco were substantially greater than the minimum amounts needed to be considered “well capitalized” under the regulations. There are various legal limitations under federal and state laws that limit the payment of dividends from the Bank to Wesbanco. As of September 30, ~~2020,~~2021, under FDIC regulations, Wesbanco could receive, without prior regulatory approval, a dividend of approximately ~~$246.5~~$253.7 million from the Bank. Wesbanco expects to continue to improve its consolidated and Bank capital ratios as necessary over time, to fund organic growth and acquisitions, primarily from retaining a majority of its earnings. The tier 1 leverage ratio decreased from December 31, 2019 to September 30, 2020 due to the full impact of OLBK’s acquired assets in 2020 due to the calculations’ use of average assets and period end capital, which impacted the fourth quarter 2019 ratios as the OLBK acquisition closed in mid-quarter. The tier 1 leverage ratio was further impacted by the PPP loans originated in the second and third quarters of 2020, affecting total assets.

On March 26, 2020, regulators issued interim financial rule (“IFR”) “Regulatory Capital Rule: Revised Transition of the Current Expected Losses Methodology for Allowances” in response to the disrupted economic activity from the spread of COVID-19. The IFR provides financial institutions that adopt CECL during 2020 with the option to delay for two years the estimated impact of CECL on regulatory capital, followed by a three-year transition period to phase out the aggregate amount of the capital benefit provided by the initial two-year delay (“~~five year~~five-year transition”). Wesbanco adopted CECL effective January 1, 2020 and elected to implement the ~~five year~~five-year transition. Regulatory capital levels without the capital benefit at September 30, ~~2020~~2021 for both the Bank and Wesbanco would have continued to be greater than the amounts needed to be considered “well capitalized”, as the capital benefit approximated 3025 to 5040 basis points for three of the four regulatory ratios, while total risk-based capital would have been slightly higher without the transition.

The following table summarizes risk-based capital amounts and ratios for Wesbanco and the Bank for the periods indicated:

							September 30, 2020							December 31, 2019													September 30, 2021							December 31, 2020
	Minimum			Well-								Minimum							Minimum		Minimum			Well-								Minimum							Minimum
(unaudited, dollars in thousands)	Value⁽¹⁾			Capitalized⁽²⁾			Amount		Ratio			Amount⁽¹⁾		Amount		Ratio			Amount⁽¹⁾		Value⁽¹⁾			Capitalized⁽²⁾			Amount		Ratio			Amount⁽¹⁾		Amount		Ratio			Amount⁽¹⁾
Wesbanco, Inc.
Tier 1 leverage		4.00	%		5.00	%	$	1,583,755		10.18	%	$	622,018	$	1,441,738		11.30	%	$	510,306		4.00	%		5.00	%	$	1,607,960		10.10	%	$	636,839	$	1,617,413		10.51	%	$	510,306
Common equity Tier 1		4.50	%		6.50	%		1,439,226		12.99	%		498,631		1,441,738		12.89	%		503,486		4.50	%		6.50	%		1,463,476		12.91	%		510,274		1,472,929		13.40	%		494,529
Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets		6.00	%		8.00	%		1,583,755		14.29	%		664,841		1,441,738		12.89	%		671,314		6.00	%		8.00	%		1,607,960		14.18	%		680,366		1,617,413		14.72	%		659,372
Total capital to risk-weighted assets		8.00	%		10.00	%		1,903,312		17.18	%		886,455		1,691,764		15.12	%		895,086		8.00	%		10.00	%		1,856,275		16.38	%		907,154		1,931,414		17.58	%		879,162
Wesbanco Bank, Inc.
Tier 1 leverage		4.00	%		5.00	%	$	1,478,498		9.52	%	$	621,284	$	1,419,968		11.12	%	$	510,591		4.00	%		5.00	%	$	1,605,464		10.10	%	$	635,854	$	1,536,609		10.00	%	$	614,792
Common equity Tier 1		4.50	%		6.50	%		1,478,498		13.09	%		507,908		1,419,968		12.74	%		501,713		4.50	%		6.50	%		1,605,464		14.21	%		506,792		1,536,609		14.04	%		492,549
Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets		6.00	%		8.00	%		1,478,498		13.09	%		677,211		1,419,968		12.74	%		668,951		6.00	%		8.00	%		1,605,464		14.21	%		675,723		1,536,609		14.04	%		656,732
Total capital to risk-weighted assets		8.00	%		10.00	%		1,633,056		14.47	%		902,948		1,498,494		13.44	%		891,935		8.00	%		10.00	%		1,695,778		15.01	%		900,964		1,685,610		15.40	%		875,643

Liquidity is defined as a financial institution’s capacity to meet its cash and collateral obligations at a reasonable cost. Liquidity risk is the risk that an institution’s financial condition or overall safety and soundness is adversely affected by an inability, or perceived inability, to meet its obligations. An institution’s obligations, and the funding sources to meet them, depend significantly on its business mix, balance sheet structure, and the cash flows of its on- and off-balance sheet obligations. Institutions confront various internal and external situations that can give rise to increased liquidity risk including funding mismatches, market constraints on funding sources, contingent liquidity events, changes in economic conditions, and exposure to credit, market, operation, legal and reputation risk. Wesbanco actively manages liquidity risk through its ability to provide adequate funds to meet changes in loan demand, unexpected outflows in deposits and other borrowings as well as to take advantage of market opportunities and meet operating cash needs. This is accomplished by maintaining liquid assets in the form of securities, sufficient borrowing capacity and a stable core deposit base. Liquidity is centrally monitored by Wesbanco’s Asset/Liability Committee (“ALCO”).

Wesbanco determines the degree of required liquidity by the relationship of total holdings of liquid assets to the possible need for funds to meet unexpected deposit losses and/or loan demands. The ability to quickly convert assets to cash at a minimal loss is a primary function of Wesbanco’s investment portfolio management. Wesbanco believes its cash flow from the loan portfolio, the investment portfolio, and other sources, adequately meet its liquidity requirements. Wesbanco’s net loans to assets ratio was ~~65.3%~~57.9% at September 30, ~~2020~~2021 and deposit balances funded ~~73.7%~~79.5% of assets.

The following table lists the sources of liquidity from assets at September 30, ~~2020~~2021 expected within the next year:

(unaudited, in thousands)
Cash and cash equivalents	$	760,266	$	1,121,116
Securities with a maturity date within the next year and callable securities		276,803		239,028
Projected payments and prepayments on mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations ⁽¹⁾		713,406		693,052
Loans held for sale		134,151		32,308
Accruing loans scheduled to mature		1,228,468		1,160,888
Normal loan repayments		1,940,633		2,218,268
Total sources of liquidity expected within the next year	$	5,053,727	$	5,464,660

Deposit flows are another principal factor affecting overall Wesbanco liquidity. Deposits totaled ~~$12.2~~$13.4 billion at September 30, ~~2020.~~2021. Deposit flows are impacted by current interest rates, products and rates offered by Wesbanco versus various forms of competition, as well as customer behavior. Certificates of deposit scheduled to mature within one year totaled ~~$1.1 billion~~$893.7 million at September 30, ~~2020,~~2021, which includes jumbo regular certificates of deposit totaling ~~$550.8~~$448.1 million with a weighted-average cost of ~~1.23%~~0.59%, and jumbo CDARS^® deposits of ~~$35.9~~$8.8 million with a weighted-average cost of ~~0.78%~~1.79%.

Wesbanco maintains a line of credit with the FHLB as an additional funding source. Available credit with the FHLB approximated ~~$3.5~~$4.0 billion and ~~$3.2~~$3.6 billion at September 30, ~~2020~~2021 and December 31, ~~2019,~~2020, respectively. The FHLB requires securities to be specifically pledged to the FHLB and maintained in a FHLB-approved custodial arrangement if the member wishes to include such securities in the maximum borrowing capacity calculation. Wesbanco has elected not to specifically pledge to the FHLB otherwise unpledged securities. At September 30, ~~2020,~~2021, the Bank had unpledged available-for-sale securities with an amortized cost of ~~$262.5 million.~~$1.0 billion, or 35.6% of the total available-for-sale portfolio. A portion of these securities could be sold for additional liquidity, or such securities could be pledged to secure additional FHLB borrowings. ~~Available liquidity through the sale of investment securities is currently limited, as only approximately 13.6%~~A significant portion of the ~~available-for-sale~~ portfolio is ~~unpledged, due~~pledged to ~~the pledging agreements that Wesbanco has with their~~ public deposit ~~customers. Public~~customers, as public deposit balances have increased significantly through the several acquisitions made since 2015, to a total of ~~$1.4~~$1.6 billion at September 30, ~~2020.~~2021. Wesbanco’s held-to-maturity portfolio currently contains ~~$537.6~~$793.2 million of unpledged securities. Most of these securities are tax-exempt municipal securities, which can only be pledged in limited circumstances. ~~Except for certain limited, special circumstances,~~Generally, these securities cannot be sold without tainting the remainder of the held-to-maturity portfolio. If tainting occurs, all remaining securities with the held-to-maturity designation would be required to be reclassified as available-for-sale, and the held-to-maturity designation would not be available to Wesbanco for a period of time.

Wesbanco participates in the Federal Reserve Bank’s Borrower-in-Custody Program (“BIC”) whereby Wesbanco pledges certain consumer loans as collateral for borrowings. AtWesbanco did not have any BIC borrowings outstanding at September 30, ~~2020, Wesbanco had a BIC line of credit totaling $196.5 million, none of which was outstanding.~~2021. Alternative funding sources may include the utilization of existing overnight lines of credit with third party banks totaling $275.0 million, none of which was outstanding at September 30, ~~2020,~~2021, along with seeking other lines of credit, borrowings under repurchase agreement lines, increasing deposit rates to attract additional funds, accessing brokered deposits, or selling securities available-for-sale or certain types of loans.

Other short-term borrowings of ~~$381.9~~$152.5 million at September 30, ~~2020~~2021 consisted of callable repurchase agreements and overnight sweep checking accounts for large commercial customers. Other short-term borrowings may also include federal funds purchased. There has been ~~an increase of $28.0 million~~a decrease in ~~the~~ average ~~deposit~~ balances of overnight sweep checking accounts during the first nine months of ~~2020,~~2021, primarily from the ~~OLBK acquisition.~~movement of overnight sweep checking accounts to transaction account deposits to reduce pledging. The overnight sweep checking accounts require U.S. Government securities to be pledged equal to or greater than the average deposit balance in the related customer accounts.

The principal sources of parent company liquidity are dividends from the Bank, ~~$247.0~~$148.2 million in cash ~~and investments~~ on hand, and a $30.0 million revolving line of credit with another bank, which did not have an outstanding balance at September 30, ~~2020.~~2021. Wesbanco is in compliance with all applicable loan covenants. There are various legal limitations under federal and state laws that limit the payment of dividends from the Bank to the parent company. As of September 30, ~~2020,~~2021, under FDIC and State of West Virginia regulations, Wesbanco could receive, without prior regulatory approval, dividends of approximately ~~$246.5~~$253.7 million from the Bank. Management believes these are appropriate levels of cash for the parent company given the current environment. Management continuously monitors the adequacy of parent company cash levels and sources of liquidity through the use of metrics that relate current cash levels to historical and forecasted cash inflows and outflows.

Wesbanco had outstanding commitments to extend credit in the ordinary course of business approximating ~~$3.3~~$3.7 billion and $3.0 billion at September 30, ~~2020~~2021 and December 31, ~~2019,~~2020, respectively. On a historical basis, only a portion of these commitments will result in an outflow of funds. Please refer to Note ~~11,~~10, “Commitments and Contingent Liabilities” of the Consolidated Financial Statements and the “Loans and Credit Risk” section of this MD&A for additional information.

Federal financial regulatory agencies have previously issued guidance ~~in 2009~~ to provide for sound practices for managing funding and liquidity risk and strengthening liquidity risk management practices. Wesbanco maintains a comprehensive management process for identifying, measuring, monitoring, and controlling liquidity risk, which is fully integrated into its risk management process. Management believes Wesbanco has sufficient current liquidity to meet current obligations to borrowers, depositors and others and thatWesbanco’s current liquidity risk management policies and procedures, as periodically reviewed and adjusted, adequately address this guidance.

The London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) is a widely used short-term reference interest rate benchmark for variable rate loans and securities, borrowings, and interest rate hedge/swap transactions. In July of 2017, the U.K. Financial Conduct Authority (“FCA”) announced the discontinuation of LIBOR after certain banks provided purported interest rate figures which did not truly reflect the rate at which they could borrow. In addition to FCA, as early as 2014, financial institution regulators and the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (“FFIEC”) began to work to develop a uniform approach to the phase-out of LIBOR because the continued reliance on LIBOR could present systematic risk to financial institutions. The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York convened the Alternative Reference Rates Committee (“AARC”) to identify alternative reference rates to LIBOR. The AARC released consultations on contractual fallback language to prepare for the transition away for LIBOR and on June 22, 2017, identified the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”) as the recommended alternative to LIBOR.

On July 1, 2020, the FFIEC issued a Joint Statement on Managing the LIBOR Transition to further explain that new financial contracts should either utilize a reference rate other than LIBOR or have robust fallback language that defines an alternative reference rate after LIBOR’s discontinuation. The FFIEC statement encouraged supervised financial institutions to continue their efforts to prepare for the change and address the risks associated with the LIBOR transition.

On November 6, 2020, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (collectively, the “Agencies”) issued a statement providing that a financial institution may use any reference rate for its loans that the financial institution determines to be appropriate for its funding model and customer needs.

Thereafter, on November 30, 2020, the Agencies issued an additional joint statement encouraging financial institutions to continue to transition away from LIBOR as soon as practicable, but no later than December 31, 2021. Given the risks associated with the use of LIBOR, the Agencies stated that entering into new contracts that use LIBOR as a reference rate after December 31, 2021, would create safety and soundness risks.

On March 5, 2021, the U.K. FCA and Intercontinental Exchange (“ICE”) Benchmark Administration announced that the publication of the overnight, as well as, the one, three, six, and twelve month LIBOR rates will continue to be published through June 30, 2023, which will provide additional time to wind down or renegotiate existing contracts that reference LIBOR.

On October 20, 2021, the Agencies with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, National Credit Union Administration, and State Bank and Credit Union Regulators, issued an additional Joint Statement on Managing the LIBOR Transition to once again emphasize the expectation that supervised institutions with LIBOR exposure continue to progress toward an orderly transition away from LIBOR. The statement confirmed that entering into new contracts, including derivatives that use LIBOR as a reference rate after December 31, 2021, would create safety and soundness risks, including litigation, operational, and consumer protection risks.

As early as 2018, in anticipation of the potential discontinuance of LIBOR, Wesbanco established a LIBOR transition committee to effectively manage the Company’s transition away from LIBOR in two phases. The first phase included adding additional fallback language to loan documents to allow Wesbanco to replace LIBOR with an equivalent rate index plus the margin to ensure the resulting interest rate is the same as it previously was using LIBOR. Also, as part of the first phase, Wesbanco began quoting to the Treasury Rate published by the Federal Reserve Board instead of the ICE LIBOR Swap Index (which is tied to LIBOR) when repricing certain term loans and originating new loans. The second phase consists of working to continue to transition existing adjustable-rate loans that fluctuate monthly or periodically that are tied to LIBOR or the ICE LIBOR Swap Index. Wesbanco is tracking the dollar amount and number of loans tied to LIBOR or the ICE LIBOR Swap Index, monitoring current industry trends, and working with legal counsel to ensure the smooth transition away from LIBOR. As of September 30, 2021, Wesbanco had a total of $1.9 billion in loans tied to either LIBOR or the ICE LIBOR Swap index, of which $1.5 billion have a maturity date after June 30, 2023. As referenced above, the U.K. FCA and ICE Benchmark Administration has extended the date of publication of certain tenors of LIBOR through June 30, 2023, giving existing LIBOR based contracts time to mature. However, in compliance with and based upon the Agencies Joint Statements referenced above, Wesbanco will not be offering LIBOR for new contracts after December 31, 2021. Accordingly, Wesbanco has initially chosen the One Month Term Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“1M Term SOFR”), which is published by the Chicago Mercantile Exchange (“CME”), as an alternative replacement rate for LIBOR. Wesbanco may also continue to utilize the Wall Street Journal Prime Rate, the Treasury Rates, and other indexes as part of its lending program. System and process updates are being made to enable the use of the 1M Term SOFR for new loan production by the end of 2021 in accordance with regulatory guidelines. At a date in the future, prior to the cessation of the publication of the one month LIBOR, Wesbanco will transition all remaining LIBOR based loans to the replacement index after notification to the impacted borrowers.

With respect to its back-to-back swap program, Wesbanco worked with its swap counterparty customers to institute and accept the International Swaps and Derivatives Association 2020 Interbank Offered Rate Fallbacks Protocol ("ISDA 2020 IBOR Protocol") to address LIBOR cessation in swap transactions. Moreover, Wesbanco has initially chosen 1M Term SOFR as its replacement index for new loans in the bank’s back-to-back swap program. The LIBOR transition committee, in consultation with market participants, expects the market for Term SOFR derivatives to be actively engaged prior to the end of 2021, allowing the program to meet the Agencies timeline of December 31, 2021.

The disclosures set forth in this item are qualified by the section captioned “Forward-Looking Statements” included in Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of this report.

The primary objective of Wesbanco’s Asset/Liability Committee (“ALCO”) is to maximize net interest income within established policy parameters. This objective is accomplished through the management of balance sheet composition, market risk exposures arising from changing economic conditions and liquidity risk.

Market risk is defined as the risk of loss due to adverse changes in the fair value of financial instruments resulting from fluctuations in interest rates and bond prices. Management considers interest rate risk to be Wesbanco’s most significant market risk. Interest rate risk is the exposure to adverse changes in net interest income due to changes in interest rates. The consistency of Wesbanco’s net interest income is largely dependent on effective management of interest rate risk. As interest rates change in the market, rates earned on interest rate-sensitive assets and rates paid on interest rate-sensitive liabilities do not necessarily move concurrently. Differing rate sensitivities may arise because fixed rate assets and liabilities may not have the same maturities, or because variable rate assets and liabilities differ in the timing and/or the percentage of rate changes.

Wesbanco’s ALCO is an executive management committee with Board representation, responsible for monitoring and managing interest rate risk within approved policy limits, utilizing earnings sensitivity simulation and economic value-at-risk models. These models are highly dependent on various assumptions, which change regularly as the balance sheet and market interest rates change. The key assumptions and strategies employed are analyzed, reviewed and documented at least quarterly by the ALCO.

The earnings sensitivity simulation model projects changes in net interest income resulting from the effects of changes in interest rates. Forecasting changes in net interest income requires management to make certain assumptions regarding loan and security prepayment rates, call dates, changes to deposit product betas and non-maturity deposit decay rates, which may not necessarily reflect the manner in which actual cash flows, yields, and costs respond to changes in market interest rates. Assumptions are based on historical experience, current market rates and economic forecasts, and are internally back-tested and periodically reviewed by a third-party consultant. The net interest income sensitivity results presented in Table 1, “Net Interest Income Sensitivity,” assumes that the balance sheet composition of interest sensitive assets and liabilities existing at the end of the period remains constant over the period being measured and also assumes that a particular change in interest rates is reflected uniformly across the yield curve, regardless of the duration of the maturity or re-pricing of specific assets and liabilities. Since the assumptions used in the model relative to changes in interest rates are uncertain, the simulation analysis may not be indicative of actual results. In addition, this analysis does not consider actions that management might employ in response to changes in interest rates, as well as changes in earning asset and costing liability balances.

Interest rate risk policy limits are determined by measuring the anticipated change in net interest income over a twelve-month period, assuming immediate and sustained market interest rate increases and decreases of 100 - 300 basis points across the entire yield curve, as compared to a stable rate environment or base model. Wesbanco’s current policy limits this exposure for the noted interest rate changes to a reduction of between ~~10%~~7.5% - 15%, or less, of net interest income from the stable rate base model over a twelve-month period. The table below indicates Wesbanco’s interest rate sensitivity at September 30, ~~2020~~2021 and December 31, ~~2019,~~2020, assuming the above-noted interest rate increases, as compared to a base model. In the current interest rate environment, particularly for short-term rates, the 100 – 300 basis points decreasing changes for September 30, ~~2020~~2021 and ~~the 200 – 300 basis points decreasing changes for~~ December 31, ~~2019~~2020 are not shown due to the unrealistic and/or negative yield nature of the results.

Immediate Change in	Percentage Change in			Percentage Change in
Interest Rates	Net Interest Income from Base over One Year		ALCO	Net Interest Income from Base over One Year		ALCO
(basis points)	September 30, 2020	December 31, 2019	Guidelines	September 30, 2021	December 31, 2020	Guidelines
+300	12.1%	5.6%	(15.0%)	15.9%	15.3%	(15.0%)
+200	8.4%	3.9%	(10.0%)	10.7%	10.3%	(10.0%)
+100	4.6%	2.2%	(7.5%)	5.7%	5.5%	(7.5%)
-100	N/A	(4.2%)	(7.5%)

Adjustments to relative sensitivities are due to the impact of the current lower rate and yield curve environment on base case net interest income and the related calculation of parallel rate shock changes in rising and falling rate scenarios. Additional differences typically result from changes in the various earning assets and costing liabilities mix and growth rates, as well as adjustments for various modeling assumptions. Generally, deposit betas utilized in modeling are estimated at more conservative percentages for both up and down rate scenarios than has been the Bank’s historical experience, as a result of both competitive factors in our markets and as public funds and institutional contract terms are renewed. Deposit betas, decay rates and loan prepayment speeds are adjusted periodically in our models for non-maturity deposits and loans. Indicated model asset sensitivity in rising rate scenarios may be less than anticipated due to slower prepayment speeds, rate floors, below forecast loan yields, spread compression between new asset yields and funding costs, mortgage-related extension risk and other factors. In a decreasing rate environment, asset sensitivity may have greater impact on the margin than currently modeled as prepayment speeds increase, customers refinance or request rate reductions on existing loans, estimated deposit betas do not perform as modeled, or for other reasons.

In addition to the aforementioned parallel rate shock earnings sensitivity simulation model, the ALCO also reviews a “dynamic” forecast scenario to project net interest income over a rolling two-year time period. This forecast is updated at least quarterly, incorporating revisions and updated assumptions into the model for estimated loan and deposit growth, expected balance sheet re-mixing strategies, changes in forecasted rates for various maturities, competitive market spreads for various products and other assumptions. Such modeling is directionally consistent with typical parallel rate shock scenarios, and it assists in predicting changes in forecasted outcomes and potential adjustments to management plans to assist in achieving earnings goals.

Wesbanco also periodically measures the economic value of equity (“EVE”), which is defined as the market value of tangible equity in various rate scenarios. Generally, changes in the economic value of equity relate to changes in various assets and liabilities, changes in the yield curve, as well as changes in loan prepayment speeds and deposit decay rates. The following table presents these results and Wesbanco’s policy limits as of September 30, ~~2020~~2021 and December 31, ~~2019.~~2020. Changes in EVE sensitivity since year-end ~~2019~~2020 relate to the ~~significant decrease~~increase in market interest rates ~~particularly in the latter half of the first quarter of 2020,~~ and their impact upon the fair values of earning assets and costing ~~liabilities:~~liabilities.

Immediate Change in	Percentage Change in			Percentage Change in
Interest Rates	Economic Value of Equity from Base over One Year		ALCO	Economic Value of Equity from Base over One Year		ALCO
(basis points)	September 30, 2020	December 31, 2019	Guidelines	September 30, 2021	December 31, 2020	Guidelines
+300	8.7%	2.6%	(30.0%)	5.0%	13.4%	(30.0%)
+200	8.3%	3.4%	(20.0%)	3.7%	10.6%	(20.0%)
+100	6.4%	4.1%	(10.0%)	3.6%	7.1%	(10.0%)
-100	N/A	(5.4%)	(10.0%)

The Bank has significant additional borrowing capacity with the FHLB of Pittsburgh, the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland and various correspondent banks, and may utilize these funding sources or interest rate swap strategies as necessary to lengthen liabilities, offset mismatches in various asset maturities and manage liquidity. CDARS® and ICS® deposits also may be utilized for similar purposes for certain customers seeking higher-yielding instruments or maintaining deposit levels below FDIC insurance limits. Significant balance sheet strategies to assist in managing the net interest margin in the current interest rate environment include:

Management is aware of the significant effect that inflation or deflation has upon interest rates and ultimately upon financial performance. Wesbanco’s ability to cope with inflation or deflation is best determined by analyzing its capability to respond to changing market interest rates, as well as its ability to manage the various elements of non-interest income and expense during periods of increasing or decreasing inflation or deflation. Wesbanco monitors the level and mix of interest-rate sensitive assets and liabilities through ALCO in order to reduce the impact of inflation or deflation on net interest income. Management also controls the effects of inflation or deflation by conducting periodic reviews of the prices, costs and terms of its various products and services, as well as competitive factors, by approving new products and services or adjusting the terms and availability of existing products and services.

~~In anticipation~~ Over the last few months of the ~~potential discontinuance~~third quarter, inflation has been trending higher and has impacted the cost of the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) at the end of 2021, Wesbanco has created a LIBOR transition committee, which has broken the Company’s transition efforts into two phases. The first phase included adding additional language to new loans that allows Wesbanco to replace LIBOR with an equivalent rate indexlabor and adjust the margin to ensure the resulting interest rate is the same as it previously was using LIBOR. Also included in the first phase was Wesbanco transitioning from the LIBOR swap curve to treasury rates when repricing certain loanspurchased goods and ~~originating new loans. The second phase is transitioning current variable loans tied to LIBOR or on a LIBOR swap curve.~~services. Wesbanco is ~~tracking~~also monitoring the ~~dollar amount~~potential impact that inflation is having on multifamily properties as proposed rental rate caps and ~~number of loans tied to LIBOR or the LIBOR swap curve, monitoring current industry trends, and engaging its legal counsel to ensure the smooth transition away from LIBOR.~~controls are put in place in areas across Wesbanco’s footprint.

EVALUATION OF DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES— Wesbanco’s Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) have concluded that Wesbanco’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended), based on their evaluation of these controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this Form 10-Q, are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by Wesbanco in the reports it files under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC and that such information is accumulated and communicated to Wesbanco’s management, including its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

LIMITATIONS ON THE EFFECTIVENESS OF CONTROLS— Wesbanco’s management, including the CEO and CFO, does not expect that Wesbanco’s disclosure controls and internal controls will prevent all errors and all fraud. While Wesbanco’s disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance of achieving their objective, no control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide absolute assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the controls.

CHANGES IN INTERNAL CONTROLS—~~There~~ During the third quarter of 2021, the Company completed the conversion of its legacy core banking system into a new core banking platform. This upgrade included enhancements to the loan and deposit areas, as well as digital banking and the general ledger, among others. As a result of the conversion, there were nocertain changes ~~in Wesbanco’s~~to processes and procedures, which have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to have materially affected, the Company's internal control over financial reporting since management's last assessment of the Company's internal control over financial reporting, which was completed as of June 30, 2021.

There have been no other changes in the Company's internal control over financial reporting during the most recently completed quarter that ~~occurred during our fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2020 as required to be reported by paragraph (d) of Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that~~have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, ~~Wesbanco’s~~the Company's internal control over financial reporting.

Wesbanco is involved in various lawsuits, claims, investigations and proceedings, which arise in the ordinary course of business. While any litigation contains an element of uncertainty, Wesbanco does not believe that a material loss related to such proceedings or claims pending or known to be threatened is reasonably possible.

In light of recent developments relating to COVID-19, and as previously disclosed in its Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on May 8, 2020 and July 29, 2020, Wesbanco is supplementing its risk factors contained in Item 1A of its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 28, 2020 (“Annual Report”). The following risk factors should be read in conjunction with the risk factors contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K. Any of the risks described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, as well as any of the risks described below, could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. Additional risks and uncertainties that are not presently known to us or that we deem immaterial may also adversely impact our business or financial results. Moreover, the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic may heighten many of the other risk factors in our Annual Report and any subsequent Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q or Current Report on Form 8-K including, but not limited to, risks of credit deterioration, interest rate changes, rating agency actions, governmental actions, market volatility, theft, fraud, security breaches and technology interruptions. ~~Except as set forth below, there are no material changes related to risk factors from the risk factors described in Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form~~ ~~10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019.~~

~~The COVID-19 pandemic is adversely affecting THE OPERATIONS OF us and our customers.~~

The spread of COVID-19 has created a global public-health crisis that has resulted in widespread volatility and deteriorations in household, business, economic, and market conditions. This pandemic has caused many state governments to enact “shelter in place” orders and the institution of social distancing requirements, which have adversely impacted the economy due to the vast restrictions and forced closures of non-essential businesses during the quarantine period. As a result, many of our customers have been adversely affected by business closures. Accordingly, COVID-19 may result in a significant decrease in our customer’ business and/or cause our customers to be unable to meet existing payment or other obligations to us. These adverse impacts on the businesses of our customers could cause a material adverse effect to our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

~~NEGATIVE ECONOMIC FACTORS MAY ADVERSELY AFFECT WESBANCO’S FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE.~~

Negative economic conditions in our markets may adversely affect Wesbanco’s financial performance. Current shelter-in-place orders in many of Wesbanco’s markets of West Virginia, Ohio, western Pennsylvania, Kentucky, southern Indiana and Maryland, will result in negative economic factors depending on the length of such government restrictions. Negative changes in economic and financial market conditions could result in additional deceases in market value of financial instruments, impairment of goodwill and intangible assets and decreases in interest income. A rise in unemployment from the forced closures of non-essential businesses, could have a negative impact on our customers’ ability to repay their loans as well as a decrease in the customer deposit base as they use their savings to pay current expenses. This could result in increased risk of delinquencies, defaults, foreclosures and losses on our loans, negatively impact regional economic conditions, result in a decline in local loan demand, loan originations and deposit availability. Any one or more of these developments could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Additionally, the COVID-19 pandemic has significantly affected the financial markets and has resulted in a number of Federal Reserve actions. Market interest rates have declined significantly. On March 3, 2020, the 10-year Treasury yield fell below 1.00% for the first time, and the Federal Reserve reduced the target federal funds rate by 50 basis points to 1.00% to 1.25%. On March 15, 2020, the Federal Reserve further reduced the target federal funds rate by 100 basis points to between 0.00% to 0.25% and announced a $700 billion quantitative easing program in response to the expected economic downturn caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. The Federal Reserve reduced the interest that it pays on excess reserves from 1.60% to 1.10% on March 3, 2020, and then to 0.10% on March 15, 2020. We expect that these reductions in interest rates, especially if prolonged, could adversely affect our net interest income and margins and our profitability.

~~MARKET VOLATILITY AND PROLONGED PERIODS OF ECONOMIC STRESS MAY AFFECT WESBANCO’S CAPITAL AND LIQUIDITY.~~

The COVID-19 pandemic has caused volatility in financial markets and could potentially cause prolonged periods of economic stress. This may result in decreased capital and liquidity. In addition to the potential affects from negative economic conditions noted above, Wesbanco instituted a program to help COVID-19 impacted customers. This program allows a 90 day deferral of loan principal and/or interest payments as long as the customer meets certain requirements. Depending on how many customer apply for this program, Wesbanco’s liquidity could be negatively impacted if a significant number of customers apply and are approved for the deferral of payments. In addition, if these deferrals are not effective in mitigating the effect of COVID-19 on our customers, it may adversely affect our business and results of operations more substantially over a longer period of time. If the economic situation deteriorates, federal and state regulators may also consider taking actions such as suspension of dividends and other capital distributions in order to conserve capital and retain capacity, any of which could adversely impact our business.

The extent to which the COVID-19 pandemic impacts our business, financial condition and results of operation, as well as our regulatory capital and liquidity ratios, will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted, including the scope and duration of the pandemic and the efficacy of actions taken by governmental authorities and other third parties in response to the pandemic.

As of September 30, ~~2020,~~2021, Wesbanco had ~~two~~one active stock repurchase ~~plans. The first active plan~~plan. It was approved by the Board of Directors on ~~approved October 22, 2015~~August 26, 2021 for ~~1.0~~3.2 million shares and ~~the second active plan was approved by the Board of Directors on December 19, 2019 for 1.7 million shares. Each~~ provides for shares to be repurchased for general corporate purposes, which may include a subsequent resource for potential acquisitions, shareholder dividend reinvestment and employee benefit plans. The timing, price and quantity of purchases are at the discretion of Wesbanco, and the plan may be discontinued or suspended at any time.

~~Repurchases~~Other repurchases in the ~~first~~third quarter included ~~open market purchases and~~ those for the KSOP and dividend reinvestment plans. ~~Wesbanco has suspended continuing open market purchases while it assesses the economic impact of the pandemic.~~

The following table presents the monthly share purchase activity during the quarter ended September 30, ~~2020:~~2021:

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

West Virginia		55-0571723
(State of incorporation)		(IRS Employer Identification No.)

1 Bank Plaza, Wheeling, WV		26003
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

(unaudited, in thousands)	November 22, 2019
Purchase price:
Fair value of Wesbanco shares issued	$	493,936
Cash consideration for outstanding OLBK shares		16
Total purchase price	$	493,952
Fair value of:
Tangible assets acquired	$	2,892,298
Core deposit and other intangible assets acquired		32,899
Liabilities assumed		(2,722,250	)
Net cash received in the acquisition		60,041
Fair value of net assets acquired		262,988
Goodwill recognized	$	230,964

(unaudited, in thousands)	November 22, 2019
Assets acquired
Cash and due from banks	$	60,041
Securities		182,171
Loans		2,514,061
Goodwill and other intangible assets		263,863
Accrued income and other assets		196,066
Total assets acquired	$	3,216,202
Liabilities assumed
Deposits	$	2,375,574
Borrowings		286,047
Accrued expenses and other liabilities		60,629
Total liabilities assumed	$	2,722,250
Net assets acquired	$	493,952

(unaudited, in thousands)	November 22, 2019
Goodwill recognized as of June 30, 2020	$	228,907
Change in fair value of net assets acquired:
Assets
Investment securities		(284	)
Loans		50
Premises and equipment		(2,214	)
Deferred tax assets		641
Accrued income and other assets		—
Liabilities
Borrowings		—
Accrued expenses and other liabilities		(250	)
Fair value of net assets acquired	$	(2,057	)
Increase in goodwill recognized		2,057
Goodwill recognized as of September 30, 2020	$	230,964

	Quantitative Information about Level 3 Fair Value Measurements
	Fair Value		Valuation	Unobservable	Range (Weighted
(unaudited, in thousands)	Estimate		Techniques	Input	Average)
September 30, 2021
Individually-evaluated loans	$	22,316	Appraisal of collateral ⁽¹⁾	Appraisal adjustments ⁽²⁾	(20.0%) to (30.0%)/(21.6%)
				Liquidation expenses ⁽²⁾	(5.6%) to (6.4%)/(6.3%)
Other real estate owned and repossessed assets	$	293	Appraisal of collateral ^{(1), (3)}
December 31, 2020
Individually-evaluated loans	$	1,958	Appraisal of collateral ⁽¹⁾	Appraisal adjustments ⁽²⁾	(30.0%)/(30.0%)
				Liquidation expenses ⁽²⁾	(5.6%)/(5.6%)
Other real estate owned and repossessed assets	$	549	Appraisal of collateral ^{(1), (3)}

Large accelerated filer	☑	Accelerated filer	☐
Non-accelerated filer	☐	Smaller reporting company	☐
		Emerging growth company	☐

	September 30, 2020
	Three Months Principal & Interest Plus Three Months Principal Only Deferral		Three Months Interest Only Deferral		Three Months Principal & Interest Deferral		Three and Six Months Principal Only Deferral
(unaudited, in thousands)	Loan Balance		Loan Balance		Loan Balance		Loan Balance		Total Loan Balance
Agriculture and farming	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Energy		—		—		—		2,408		2,408
Construction		—		7,175		128		39		7,342
Manufacturing		458		—		—		451		909
Wholesale and distribution		—		—		885		415		1,300
Retail		2,660		—		15,618		3,125		21,403
Transportation and warehousing		134		—		—		543		677
Information and communications		—		—		—		—		—
Finance and insurance		—		—		—		—		—
Equipment leasing		—		—		—		—		—
Real estate - 1-4 family		29,771		—		1,363		4,223		35,357
Real estate - multi-family		10,473		—		3,960		2,263		16,696
Real estate - other retail		25,433		—		3,392		3,190		32,015
Real estate - shopping center		44,853		—		—		—		44,853
Real estate - office building		22,944		327		1,152		798		25,221
Real estate - commercial/manufacturing		25,988		—		14,462		612		41,062
Real estate - residential buildings		3,395		—		3,759		355		7,509
Real estate - other		28,408		424		1,974		988		31,794
Services		5,018		94		2,386		1,979		9,477
Schools and education services		—		—		257		53		310
Healthcare		831		—		10,104		2,852		13,787
Entertainment and recreation		9,758		—		—		325		10,083
Hotels		94,196		29,939		185,452		—		309,587
Other accommodations		17,455		—		—		23,150		40,605
Restaurants		4,996		—		1,938		2,375		9,309
Religious organizations		130		—		329		121		580
Government		836		—		24		—		860
Unclassified		941		—		—		—		941
Total modified commercial loans	$	328,678	$	37,959	$	247,183	$	50,265	$	664,085

Period	Total Number of Shares Purchased		Average Price Paid per Share		Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans		Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans
Balance at June 30, 2020								1,707,651

July 1, 2020 to July 31, 2020
Open market repurchases		—		—		—		1,707,651
Other repurchases (2)		—		—		—		1,707,651
Other transactions (1)		34,720	$	20.37	N/A		N/A

August 1, 2020 to August 31, 2020
Open market repurchases		—		—		—		1,707,651
Other repurchases (2)		—		—		—		1,707,651
Other transactions (1)		533	$	22.33	N/A		N/A

September 1, 2020 to September 30, 2020
Open market repurchases		—		—		—		1,707,651
Other repurchases (2)		3,194	$	22.01		3,194		1,704,457
Other transactions (1)		123		22.76	N/A		N/A
Third Quarter 2020
Open market repurchases		—		—		—		1,707,651
Other repurchases (2)		3,194	$	22.01		3,194		1,704,457
Other transactions (1)		35,376		20.41	N/A		N/A
Total		38,570	$	20.54		3,194		1,704,457

Period	Total Number of Shares Purchased (1)		Average Price Paid per Share		Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans (2)		Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans (3)
Balance at June 30, 2021								1,899,216

July 1, 2021 to July 31, 2021		591,830	$	34.47		566,474		1,332,742
August 1, 2021 to August 31, 2021		811,192	$	33.75		808,196		3,724,546
September 1, 2021 to September 30, 2021		765,009	$	32.19		763,745		2,960,801
Total		2,168,031	$	33.40		2,138,415		2,960,801

~~3.1~~10.1		~~Amended~~Consulting Agreement, dated as of September 1, 2021, by and ~~Restated Articles of Incorporation of~~between Wesbanco, Inc. and Robert H. Young (incorporated by reference to ~~Exhibit 3.1 of~~ Form 8-K filed by ~~WesBanco, Inc.~~the Registrant with the Securities and Exchange Commission on ~~August 11, 2020).~~

~~4.1~~		Deposit Agreement, dated August 11, 2020, by and among the Company, Computershare Inc. and Computershare Trust Company, N.A. acting jointly as the depositary, and the holders from time to time of the depositary receipts described therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of Form 8-K filed by Wesbanco, Inc. with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 11, 2020).

~~4.2~~		Specimen of Certificate representing the Series A Preferred Stock (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of Form 8-K filed by Wesbanco, Inc. with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 11, 2020).

~~4.3~~		~~Form of Depositary Receipt (included in Exhibit 4.1 hereto).~~

~~10.1~~		Amendment to Loan Documents between Wesbanco, Inc. and PNC Bank, National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Form 8-K filed by Wesbanco, Inc. with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 28, 2020)September 2, 2021).

31.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Periodic Report Pursuant to Rule 13a-15(e) or Rule 15d-15(e).

31.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Periodic Report Pursuant to Rule 13a-15(e) or Rule 15d-15(e).

32.1		Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

101.INS		Inline XBRL Instance Document (the instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document).

101.SCH		Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

101.CAL		Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

101.DEF		Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

101.LAB		Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document

101.PRE		Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

104		Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101).

	WESBANCO, INC.

Date: ~~October 30, 2020~~November 8, 2021	/s/ Todd F. Clossin
	Todd F. Clossin
	President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)

Date: ~~October 30, 2020~~November 8, 2021	/s/ Robert H. Young
	Robert H. Young
	Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
	(Principal Financial ~~and Accounting~~ Officer)