UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark one)


☒	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended ~~June 24, 2020~~March 31, 2021


☐	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number: 001-36556

EL POLLO LOCO HOLDINGS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware		20-3563182
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

3535 Harbor Blvd., Suite 100, Costa Mesa, California		92626
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

(714) 599-5000

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

N/A

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class	Trading Symbol(s)	Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share	LOCO	The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. ☒ Yes ☐ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). ☒ Yes ☐ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large Accelerated Filer	☐	Accelerated Filer	☒

Non-accelerated Filer	☐	Smaller Reporting Company	☒☐

		Emerging Growth Company	☐

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). ☐ Yes ☒ No

As of ~~July 24, 2020,~~April 30, 2021, there were ~~35,922,099~~36,477,479 shares of the issuer’s common stock outstanding.

Table of Contents


Table of Contents		Page

PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION		3
Item 1. Financial Statements.		3
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)		3
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income (Unaudited)		4
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Unaudited)		5
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity (Unaudited)		6
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)		87
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)		98
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.		3128
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.		4942
Item 4. Controls and Procedures.		5043

PART II—OTHER INFORMATION		5144
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.		5144
Item 1A. Risk Factors.		5144
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.		5144
Item 3. Defaults ofUpon Senior Securities.		5144
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.		5144
Item 5. Other Information.		5144
Item 6. Exhibits.		5245
Signatures		5346

Table of Contents

PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements.

EL POLLO LOCO HOLDINGS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (UNAUDITED)

(Amounts in thousands, except share data)


	June 24,		December 25,		March 31,		December 30,
	2020		2019		2021		2020
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	60,342	$	8,070	$	6,669	$	13,219
Accounts and other receivables, net		16,115		8,505		11,018		9,963
Inventories		1,954		2,009		1,928		2,100
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		2,696		5,718		4,438		3,865
Income tax receivable		—		376		615		2,522
Total current assets		81,107		24,678		24,668		31,669
Property and equipment owned, net		84,262		91,778
Property held under operating leases, net ("ROU asset")		184,308		192,395
Property and equipment, net						80,059		79,642
Property and equipment held under finance lease, net						1,830		1,661
Property and equipment held under operating leases, net (“ROU asset”)						176,838		177,129
Goodwill		248,674		248,674		248,674		248,674
Trademarks		61,888		61,888		61,888		61,888
Deferred tax assets		4,185		3,709		3,193		3,166
Other assets		1,168		1,630		1,431		1,392
Total assets	$	665,592	$	624,752	$	598,581	$	605,221
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Current liabilities:
Current portion of obligations under finance leases	$	37	$	34	$	134	$	70
Current portion of obligations under operating leases		17,979		16,406		19,949		19,907
Accounts payable		9,338		5,627		9,622		7,472
Accrued salaries and vacation		6,277		8,618		6,722		10,166
Accrued insurance		10,138		9,440		10,650		10,416
Accrued income taxes payable		1,693		—
Accrued interest		217		302		97		89
Current portion of income tax receivable agreement payable		4,987		4,935		1,597		1,577
Other accrued expenses and current liabilities		16,376		28,597		17,587		16,715
Total current liabilities		67,042		73,959		66,358		66,412
Revolver loan		138,800		97,000		53,800		62,800
Obligations under finance leases, net of current portion		63		83		1,818		1,692
Obligations under operating leases, net of current portion		189,060		197,492		178,648		178,658
Deferred taxes		1,671		1,672		4,997		5,227
Income tax receivable agreement payable, net of current portion		3,419		3,301		1,465		1,562
Other noncurrent liabilities		8,978		5,679		8,633		11,292
Total liabilities		409,033		379,186		315,719		327,643
Commitments and contingencies
Commitments and contingencies (Note 7)
Stockholders’ Equity
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized; NaN issued or outstanding		—		—		0		0
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 200,000,000 shares authorized; 35,854,122 and 35,126,582 shares issued and outstanding		359		351
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 200,000,000 shares authorized; 36,478,683 and 36,423,505 shares issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2021 and December 30, 2020, respectively						365		364
Additional paid-in-capital		334,088		330,950		340,739		339,561
Accumulated deficit		(76,889)		(85,988)		(57,550)		(61,514)
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income		(999)		253
Accumulated other comprehensive loss						(692)		(833)
Total stockholders’ equity		256,559		245,566		282,862		277,578
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	665,592	$	624,752	$	598,581	$	605,221

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements (unaudited).

Table of Contents

EL POLLO LOCO HOLDINGS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (UNAUDITED)

(Amounts in thousands, except share data)



	Thirteen Weeks Ended				Twenty-Six Weeks Ended				Thirteen Weeks Ended
	June 24, 2020		June 26, 2019		June 24, 2020		June 26, 2019		March 31, 2021		March 25, 2020
Revenue
Company-operated restaurant revenue	$	87,707	$	100,139	$	180,341	$	197,289	$	94,161	$	92,634
Franchise revenue		6,719		7,918		13,781		14,362		7,612		7,062
Franchise advertising fee revenue		5,178		5,683		10,645		11,066		5,948		5,467
Total revenue		99,604		113,740		204,767		222,717		107,721		105,163
Cost of operations
Food and paper cost		22,873		27,886		48,435		55,038		24,391		25,562
Labor and related expenses		25,759		29,272		54,452		58,848		30,732		28,693
Occupancy and other operating expenses		21,922		23,032		44,031		46,259		23,844		22,109
Company restaurant expenses		70,554		80,190		146,918		160,145		78,967		76,364
General and administrative expenses		10,465		9,348		19,796		20,696		10,474		9,331
Franchise expenses		6,627		7,542		13,538		13,686		7,751		6,911
Depreciation and amortization		4,168		4,454		8,537		9,215		3,938		4,369
Loss on disposal of assets		27		134		127		178		26		100
Recovery of securities lawsuits related legal expenses and other insurance claims		(123)		(10,000)		(123)		(10,000)
Impairment and closed-store reserves		437		565		2,839		874		564		2,402
Loss on disposition of restaurants		—		927		—		5,051
Total expenses		92,155		93,160		191,632		199,845		101,720		99,477
Income from operations		7,449		20,580		13,135		22,872		6,001		5,686
Interest expense, net		908		922		1,813		1,781		517		905
Income tax receivable agreement expense (income)		290		(94)		170		77
Income tax receivable agreement income										(77)		(120)
Income before provision for income taxes		6,251		19,752		11,152		21,014		5,561		4,901
Provision for income taxes		752		5,665		2,053		6,014		1,597		1,301
Net income	$	5,499	$	14,087	$	9,099	$	15,000	$	3,964	$	3,600
Net income per share
Basic	$	0.16	$	0.37	$	0.26	$	0.39	$	0.11	$	0.10
Diluted	$	0.16	$	0.37	$	0.26	$	0.38	$	0.11	$	0.10
Weighted-average shares used in computing net income per share
Basic		34,836,410		37,939,912		34,747,785		38,296,807		35,795,205		34,659,160
Diluted		35,410,198		38,580,722		35,382,607		39,043,477		36,424,068		35,347,456

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements (unaudited).

Table of Contents

EL POLLO LOCO HOLDINGS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (UNAUDITED)

(Amounts in ~~thousands, except share data)~~thousands)


	Thirteen Weeks Ended				Twenty-Six Weeks Ended				Thirteen Weeks Ended
	June 24, 2020		June 26, 2019		June 24, 2020		June 26, 2019		March 31, 2021		March 25, 2020
Net income	$	5,499	$	14,087	$	9,099	$	15,000	$	3,964	$	3,600
Other comprehensive loss (income)
Other comprehensive income
Changes in derivative instruments
Unrealized net losses arising during the period from interest rate swap		296		—		1,755		—
Unrealized net gains arising during the period from interest rate swap										78		1,459
Reclassifications of losses into net income		(81)		—		(42)		—		115		39
Income benefit		(58)		—		(461)		—
Other comprehensive loss, net of taxes		157		—		1,252		—
Income tax expense										(52)		(403)
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of taxes										141		(1,095)
Comprehensive income	$	5,342	$	14,087	$	7,847	$	15,000	$	4,105	$	2,505

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements (unaudited).

Table of Contents

EL POLLO LOCO HOLDINGS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (UNAUDITED)

(Amounts in thousands, except share data)


	Thirteen Weeks Ended June 24, 2020											Thirteen Weeks Ended March 31, 2021
								Accumulated											Accumulated
				Additional				Other		Total					Additional				Other		Total
	Common Stock			Paid-in		Accumulated		Comprehensive		Stockholders’		Common Stock			Paid-in		Accumulated		Comprehensive		Stockholders’
	Shares	Amount		Capital		Deficit		Income (Loss)		Equity		Shares	Amount		Capital		Deficit		Income (Loss)		Equity
Balance, March 25, 2020	35,089,983	$	351	$	331,484	$	(82,388)	$	(842)	$	248,605
Balance, December 30, 2020												36,423,505	$	364	$	339,561	$	(61,514)	$	(833)	$	277,578
Stock-based compensation	—		—		727		—		—		727	—		—		853		—		—		853
Issuance of common stock related to restricted stock	436,263		4		(4)		—		—		—
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock options	372,556		4		2,161		—		—		2,165	61,419		1		325		—		—		326
Shares repurchased for employee tax withholdings	(20,193)		—		(280)		—		—		(280)
Forfeiture of common stock related to restricted shares	(24,487)		—		—		—		—		—	(6,241)		—		—		—		—		—
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax	—		—		—		—		(157)		(157)	—		—		—		—		141		141
Net income	—		—		—		5,499		—		5,499	—		—		—		3,964		—		3,964
Balance, June 24, 2020	35,854,122	$	359	$	334,088	$	(76,889)	$	(999)	$	256,559
Balance, March 31, 2021												36,478,683	$	365	$	340,739	$	(57,550)	$	(692)	$	282,862

	Thirteen Weeks Ended June 26, 2019											Thirteen Weeks Ended March 25, 2020
								Accumulated											Accumulated
				Additional				Other		Total					Additional				Other		Total
	Common Stock			Paid-in		Accumulated		Comprehensive		Stockholders’		Common Stock			Paid-in		Accumulated		Comprehensive		Stockholders’
	Shares	Amount		Capital		Deficit		Income		Equity		Shares	Amount		Capital		Deficit		Income (Loss)		Equity
Balance, March 27, 2019	38,730,204	$	388	$	372,825	$	(109,975)	$	—		263,238
Balance, December 25, 2019												35,126,582	$	351	$	330,950	$	(85,988)	$	253	$	245,566
Stock-based compensation	—		—		641		—		—		641	—		—		534		—		—		534
Issuance of common stock related to restricted shares	323,489		3		(3)		—		—		—
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock options	6,709		—		80		—		—		80
Shares repurchased for employee tax withholdings	(24,172)		(1)		(278)		—		—		(279)
Repurchase of common stock	(1,303,282)		(13)		(14,930)		—		—		(14,943)
Forfeiture of common stock related to restricted shares												(36,599)		—		—		—		—		—
Other comprehensive income, net of tax												—		—		—		—		(1,095)		(1,095)
Net income	—		—		—		14,087		—		14,087	—		—		—		3,600		—		3,600
Balance, June 26, 2019	37,732,948	$	377	$	358,335	$	(95,888)	$	—	$	262,824
Balance, March 25, 2020												35,089,983	$	351	$	331,484	$	(82,388)	$	(842)	$	248,605

~~Table of Contents~~

Twenty-Six Weeks Ended June 24, 2020










Accumulated








Additional



Other

Total

Common Stock

Paid-in

Accumulated

Comprehensive

Stockholders’


Shares

Amount

Capital

Deficit

Income (Loss)

Equity
Balance, December 25, 2019

35,126,582

$
351

$
330,950

$
(85,988)

$
253

$
245,566
Stock-based compensation

—

—

1,261

—

—

1,261
Issuance of common stock related to restricted stock

436,263

4

(4)

—

—

—
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock options

372,556

4

2,161

—

—

2,165
Shares repurchased for employee tax withholdings

(20,193)

—

(280)

—

—

(280)
Forfeiture of common stock related to restricted shares

(61,086)

—

—

—

—

—
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax

—

—

—

—

(1,252)

(1,252)
Net income

—

—

—

9,099

—

9,099
Balance, June 24, 2020

35,854,122

$
359

$
334,088

$
(76,889)

$
(999)

$
256,559

Twenty-Six Weeks Ended June 26, 2019










Accumulated








Additional



Other

Total

Common Stock

Paid-in

Accumulated

Comprehensive

Stockholders’


Shares

Amount

Capital

Deficit

Income

Equity
Balance, December 26, 2018

39,009,451

$
390

$
375,734

$
(110,888)

$
—

265,236
Stock-based compensation

—

—

1,129

—

—

1,129
Issuance of common stock related to restricted shares

301,371

3

(3)

—

—

—
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock options

6,709

—

80

—

—

80
Shares repurchased for employee tax withholdings

(25,747)

(1)

(294)

—

—

(295)
Repurchase of common stock

(1,558,836)

(15)

(18,311)

—

—

(18,326)
Net income

—

—

—

15,000

—

15,000
Balance, June 26, 2019

37,732,948

$
377

$
358,335

$
(95,888)

$
—

$
262,824

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements (unaudited)

Table of Contents

EL POLLO LOCO HOLDINGS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)

(Amounts in thousands)



	Twenty-Six Weeks Ended				Thirteen Weeks Ended
	June 24, 2020		June 26, 2019		March 31, 2021		March 25, 2020
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	9,099	$	15,000	$	3,964	$	3,600
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flows provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		8,537		9,215		3,938		4,369
Stock-based compensation expense		1,261		1,129		853		534
Income tax receivable agreement expense		170		77
Loss on disposition of restaurants		—		5,051
Income tax receivable agreement income						(77)		(120)
Loss on disposal of assets		127		178		26		100
Impairment of property and equipment		1,972		227		303		1,920
Amortization of deferred financing costs		126		126		62		63
Amortization of favorable and unfavorable leases, net		—		(362)
Deferred income taxes, net		(363)		5,799		(310)		916
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts and other receivables, net		(7,610)		(2,084)
Accounts and other receivables						(1,055)		(3,569)
Inventories		55		277		172		(83)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		3,021		(450)		(572)		1,111
Income taxes receivable/payable						1,907		38
Other assets		339		23		(101)		201
Accounts payable		3,610		1,057		2,811		490
Accrued salaries and vacation		(2,342)		(487)		(3,444)		(999)
Accrued insurance		698		1,163		234		442
Income taxes payable		2,069		(3)
Other accrued expenses and liabilities		(9,687)		(23,077)		(1,313)		(16,539)
Net cash flows provided by operating activities		11,082		12,859
Net cash flows provided by (used in) operating activities						7,398		(7,526)
Cash flows from investing activities:
Proceeds from disposition of restaurants		—		4,770
Purchase of property and equipment		(2,479)		(5,898)		(5,257)		(1,632)
Net cash flows used in investing activities		(2,479)		(1,128)		(5,257)		(1,632)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Minimum tax withholdings related to net share settlements		(280)		(295)
Proceeds from borrowings on revolver and swingline loans						—		52,500
Payments on revolver and swingline loan		(10,700)		(15,000)		(9,000)		(8,000)
Borrowings on revolver and swingline loan		52,500		26,000
Proceeds from issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock options, net of expenses		2,165		80		326		—
Payment of obligations under finance leases		(16)		(53)		(17)		(8)
Stock buybacks		—		(18,151)
Net cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities		43,669		(7,419)
Increase in cash and cash equivalents		52,272		4,312
Net cash flows (used in) provided by financing activities						(8,691)		44,492
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents						(6,550)		35,334
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		8,070		6,969		13,219		8,070
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	60,342	$	11,281	$	6,669	$	43,404



	Twenty-Six Weeks Ended				Thirteen Weeks Ended
	June 24, 2020		June 26, 2019		March 31, 2021		March 25, 2020
Supplemental cash flow information
Cash paid during the period for interest	$	1,738	$	1,694	$	334	$	1,112
Cash paid during the period for income taxes	$	434	$	218
Unpaid purchases of property and equipment	$	846	$	980	$	1,172	$	1,085
Unpaid stock buybacks	$	—	$	310

See notes to ~~the~~ condensed consolidated financial statements (unaudited).

Table of Contents

EL POLLO LOCO HOLDINGS, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Overview

El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc. (“Holdings”) is a Delaware corporation headquartered in Costa Mesa, California. Holdings and its direct and indirect subsidiaries are collectively referred to herein as “we,” “us” or the “Company.” The Company’s activities are conducted principally through its indirect wholly-owned subsidiary, El Pollo Loco, Inc. (“EPL”), which develops, franchises, licenses, and operates quick-service restaurants under the name El Pollo Loco® and operates under 1 operating segment. At ~~June 24, 2020,~~March 31, 2021, the Company operated ~~196~~198 and franchised 283 El Pollo Loco restaurants.

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) for interim financial statements and pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments consisting of normal recurring adjustments necessary for a fair ~~presentation~~statement of the Company’s consolidated financial position and results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented. Interim results of operations are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be achieved for the full year. The condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes do not include all information and footnotes required by GAAP for annual reports. This quarterly report should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December ~~25, 2019.~~30, 2020.

The Company uses a 52- or 53-week fiscal year ending on the last Wednesday of the calendar year. In a 52-week fiscal year, each quarter includes 13 weeks of operations; in a 53-week fiscal year, the first, second and third quarters each include 13 weeks of operations, and the fourth quarter includes 14 weeks of operations. Every six or seven years, a 53-week fiscal year occurs. Fiscal ~~2020~~2021 is ~~a 53-week year ending on December 30, 2020, and fiscal 2019 was~~ a 52-week year ending on December ~~25, 2019.~~29, 2021, and fiscal 2020 was a 53-week year ended on December 30, 2020. Revenues, expenses, and other financial and operational figures may be elevated in a 53-week year.

Holdings has no material assets or operations. Holdings and Holdings’ direct subsidiary, EPL Intermediate, Inc. (“Intermediate”), guarantee EPL’s 2018 Revolver (as defined below) on a full and unconditional basis (see Note 4)4, “Long-Term Debt”), and Intermediate has no subsidiaries other than EPL. EPL is a separate and distinct legal entity and has no obligation to make funds available to Intermediate. EPL and Intermediate may pay dividends to Intermediate and to Holdings, respectively, subject to the terms of the 2018 Revolver.

Principles of Consolidation

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Holdings and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the condensed consolidated financial statements and revenue and expenses during the periods reported. Actual results could materially differ from those estimates. The Company’s significant estimates include estimates for impairment of goodwill, intangible assets and property and equipment, insurance reserves, lease accounting matters, stock-based compensation, income tax receivable agreement liability, contingent liabilities and income tax valuation allowances.

Table of Contents

COVID-19

On January 30, 2020, the World Health Organization (“WHO”) announced a global health emergency because of a new strain of coronavirus originating in Wuhan, China ("COVID-19") and the risks to the international community as the virus spreads globally beyond its point of origin. On March 11, 2020, the WHO classified the COVID-19 outbreak as a pandemic, based on the rapid increase in exposure globally.

The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly disrupted ~~consumer demand, as well as the Company’s~~our restaurant operations. Following the pandemic declaration in March 2020, federal, state and local governments began to respond to the public health crisis by requiring social distancing, ~~"stay~~“stay at ~~home"~~home” directives, and restaurant restrictions - including government-mandated dining room closures - that limited business to off-premise services only (take-out, drive-thru and delivery). Historically, approximately 20% of the Company’s sales are associated with dine-in service. In May 2020, the “stay at home” directive was modified in most areas in which the Company operates, allowing for the opening of lower-risk workplaces, including restaurants, but with restrictions such as limited capacity. However, in recent months a surge in the COVID-19 pandemic has caused manyMany state and local governments continue to ~~re-implement~~periodically implement certain restrictions to try and contain the spread of the virus. ~~Except for 9 restaurants in Houston and 1 in Utah, all~~As of March 31, 2021, the majority of the Company’s restaurants ~~are operating on~~have dining rooms open at a limited capacity and continue to maintain take-away, mobile pick-up, ~~and~~ delivery, ~~basis, as well as maintaining~~and drive-thru operations where ~~available,~~ available. During the last two months of 2020 and early 2021, the Los Angeles market was heavily impacted by an increase in ~~order to protect its employees~~ ~~and customers from the spread of the~~ COVID-19 ~~pandemic and to comply with the government mandates.~~cases. Due to our high concentration of restaurants in this market, the ~~impact~~Company was disproportionately impacted by this spike. During the thirteen weeks ended March 31, 2021, the Company temporarily closed 45 restaurants, of ~~the COVID-19 pandemic,~~which all have reopened as of March 31, 2021. Similarly, during the thirteen ~~and twenty-six~~ weeks ended ~~June 24, 2020,~~March 31, 2021, certain of the ~~Company has~~Company’s franchisees temporarily closed 3115 restaurants, ~~typically for~~ ~~one~~ ~~to three days, 30~~all of which have reopened ~~and 1 remained closed~~ as of ~~June 24, 2020. Similarly, franchisees have temporarily closed 21~~March 31, 2021. For both franchise-operated and company-operated restaurants, ~~of which 17 have reopened~~this represents total temporary closures and ~~4 remain closed as of June 24, 2020.~~may include more than one closure for the same restaurant. These closures typically lasted from one to three days. As of ~~June 24, 2020,~~March 31, 2021, the Company had not permanently closed any restaurants due to the COVID-19 pandemic. See “Subsequent Events” below for the status of temporary restaurant closures after March 31, 2021

~~The full impact of~~During the COVID-19 outbreak continues to evolve as of the date of this report. Management has taken precautionary actions, such as drawing on its 2018 Revolver (see Note 4), temporarily suspending all but essential capital spending and share repurchase activity, reevaluating essential support center general and administrative expenses and fine-tuning its restaurant labor model based on indoor dining room restrictions, limited dining room capacity in restaurants located in geographies where indoor dining is permitted, dining room closures and fluctuating sales volumes. Additionally, Management has delayed making April, May and June rent payments on the majority of its leased properties and has reached agreements for rent abatement and/or deferment with the Company’s landlords for those properties. See Note 5 “Other Accrued Expenses and Current Liabilities” and Note 6 “Other Noncurrent Liabilities” for details of these balances. For the Company’s franchisees,thirteen weeks ended March 31, 2021, the Company ~~deferred 50%~~incurred $2.8 million in COVID-19 related expenses, primarily due to leaves of ~~their April royalties as well as 100% of their 2020 remodel~~absence and new restaurant build requirements until 2021. Management is continually evaluating the impact of the global crisis on its financial condition, liquidity, operations, suppliers, industry, and workforce and will take additional actions as necessary. The disruption in operations led to the Company considering the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on its liquidity, debt covenant compliance, and recoverability of long-lived and ROU assets, goodwill and intangible assets, among others. If these disruptions to the Company’s operations from the COVID-19 pandemic continue, they may have a material negative impact on the Company’s consolidated financial condition, future results of operations and liquidity. The extent of such negative impact will depend, in part, on the longevity and severity of the pandemic.

Due to the rapid development and fluidity of this situation, the Company cannot determine the ultimate impact that the COVID-19 pandemic will have on the Company’s consolidated financial condition, liquidity, and future results of operations, and therefore any prediction as to the ultimate materiality of the adverse impact on the Company’s consolidated financial condition, liquidity, and future results of operations is uncertain.overtime pay.

Subsequent Events

Subsequent to ~~June 24, 2020,~~March 31, 2021, the Company has temporarily closed 362 restaurants, typically for one to three days, and franchisees have not temporarily closed 11any restaurants. As of ~~July 31, 2020, 4~~May 6, 2021, all company-operated and 3 franchise locations remained ~~closed.~~

Subsequent to June 24, 2020, the Surety, from whom the Company procured an appeal bond to secure the judgement against the Company in the matter of Janice P. Handlers-Bryman and Michael D. Bryman v. El Pollo Loco, Inc., released its collateral demand, freeing the $2.7 million Letter of Credit previously issued in April 2020. Additionally,

~~Table of Contents~~

~~subsequent to June 24, 2020, the Company reached an agreement in principle with the plaintiffs to resolve the lawsuit. See Note 7, “Commitments and Contingencies, Legal Matters” for more details.~~open.

The Company has evaluated subsequent events that have occurred after ~~June 24, 2020,~~March 31, 2021, and determined that there were no other events or transactions occurring during this reporting period that require recognition or disclosure in the condensed consolidated financial statements.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all ~~highly-liquid~~liquid instruments with an original maturity of three months or less at the date of purchase to be cash equivalents.

Liquidity

The Company’s principal liquidity and capital requirements are new restaurants, existing restaurant capital investments (remodels and maintenance), interest payments on our debt, lease obligations and working capital and general corporate needs. At ~~June 24, 2020,~~March 31, 2021, the Company’s total debt was ~~$138.8~~$53.8 million. The Company’s ability to make payments on its indebtedness and to fund planned capital expenditures depends on available cash and its ability to generate adequate cash flows in the future, which, to a certain extent, is subject to general economic, financial, competitive, legislative, regulatory, and other factors that are beyond the Company’s control. Based on current operations, the Company believes that its cash flow from operations and available cash of ~~$60.3~~$6.7 million at ~~June 24, 2020~~March 31, 2021 will be adequate to meet the Company’s liquidity needs for the next twelve months from the date of filing of these condensed consolidated financial statements. However, depending on the severity and longevity of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Company’s financial performance and liquidity could be further impacted and could impact the Company’s ability to meet certain covenants required in its 2018 Credit Agreement (as defined below), specifically the lease-adjusted coverage ratio and fixed-charge coverage ratio.

~~Recovery of Securities Class Action Legal Expenses and Other Insurance Claims~~

During the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 24, 2020, the Company received insurance proceeds of $0.1 million related to a property claim. During the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 26, 2019, the Company received insurance proceeds of $10.0 million related to the settlement of a securities class action lawsuit. See Note 7, “Commitments and Contingencies, Legal Matters.’

~~Loss on Disposition of Restaurants~~

During the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 26, 2019, the Company completed the sale of 4 company-operated restaurants within the San Francisco area to an existing franchisee and 7 company-operated restaurants in the Phoenix area to another existing franchisee. The Company determined that these restaurant dispositions represent multiple element arrangements, and as a result, the cash consideration received was allocated to the separate elements based on their relative selling price. Cash proceeds included upfront consideration for the sale of the restaurants and franchise fees, as well as future cash consideration for royalties and lease payments. The Company considered the future lease payments in allocating the initial cash consideration received. The cash consideration per restaurant for franchise fees is consistent with the amounts stated in the related franchise agreements, which are charged for separate standalone arrangements. The Company initially defers and subsequently recognizes the franchise fees over the term of the franchise agreement. Future royalty income is also recognized in revenue as earned.

These sales resulted in cash proceeds of $4.8 million and a net loss on sale of restaurants of $0.9 million and $5.1 million for the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 26, 2019, respectively. These restaurants are now included in the total number of franchised El Pollo Loco restaurants.

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

In ~~March 2020,~~January 2021, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ~~("FASB"~~(“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update ~~("ASU"~~(“ASU”) No. ~~2020-04, "Reference~~2021-01, “Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848): ~~Facilitation of~~Scope” which clarifies the ~~Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting," which provides optional~~FASB’s recent rate reform guidance ~~for a limited time, to ease the potential burden~~ in ~~accounting for or~~

119

Table of Contents

~~recognizing~~Topic 848, Reference Rate Reform, that optional expedients and exceptions therein for contract modification and hedge accounting apply to derivatives that are affected by the ~~effects~~discontinuation of ~~reference~~the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) and the use of new interest rate ~~reform on financial reporting.~~benchmarks. ASU ~~2020-04~~2021-01 is effective ~~for a limited time,~~immediately. Entities may choose to apply the amendments retrospectively as of any date from the beginning of an interim period that includes or is subsequent to March 12, 2020, ~~through December 31, 2022.~~or prospectively to new modifications from any date within an interim period that includes or is subsequent to January 7, 2021, up to the date that financial statements are available to be issued. The Company adopted this ASU on ~~March 12, 2020.~~January 7, 2021. The adoption of ASU ~~2020-04~~2021-01 did not have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.

In ~~February 2018,~~October 2020, the FASB issued ASU No. ~~2018-13, "Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosure Framework—Changes to~~2020-10, “Codification Improvements,” which improve the ~~Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement," which finalizes proposed ASU No. 2015-350, and~~consistency of the ~~same name as part of its~~codification by including all disclosure ~~framework project, which focuses on improving the effectiveness of disclosures~~guidance in the ~~notes to financial statements by facilitating clear communication of the information required by U.S. GAAP that~~appropriate Disclosure Section (Section 50). ASU 2020-10 is ~~most important to users of each entity’s financial statements.~~effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2020, and for interim periods within annual periods beginning after December 15, 2020. The Company adopted this ASU ~~No. 2018-13~~ during the first quarter of ~~2020.~~2021. The adoption of ASU ~~2018-13~~2020-10 did not have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, "Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments," which finalizes proposed ASU No. 2012-260 "Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Subtopic 825-15)" and adds Topic 326 "Financial Instruments—Credit Losses", to provide financial statement users with more decision-useful information about the expected credit losses on financial instruments and other commitments to extend credit held by a reporting entity at each reporting date by replacing the incurred loss impairment methodology in current GAAP with a methodology that reflects expected credit losses and requires consideration of a broader range of reasonable and supportable information to inform credit loss estimates. The Company adopted ASU No. 2016-13 during the first quarter of 2020. The adoption of ASU 2016-03 did not have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.

~~Recent Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted~~

In December 2019, the FASB issued ASU No. 2019-12, ~~"Income~~“Income Taxes (Topic 740): Simplifying the Accounting for Income ~~Taxes"~~Taxes”, which modifies Topic 740 to simplify the accounting for income taxes. ASU 2019-12 is effective for financial statements issued for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2020, and for the interim periods therein. The Company adopted this ASU during the first quarter of 2021. The adoption of ASU 2019-12 isdid not ~~expected to~~ have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.

Concentration of Risk

Cash and cash equivalents are maintained at financial institutions and, at times, these balances may exceed federally-insured limits. The Company has never experienced any losses related to these balances.

The Company had 1 supplier ~~for which~~to whom amounts due totaled ~~44.5% and 11.7%~~28.5% of the Company’s accounts payable at ~~June 24,~~March 31, 2021. At December 30, 2020, the Company had 2 suppliers to whom amounts due totaled 24.2% and ~~December 25, 2019, respectively.~~11.4% of the Company’s accounts payable. Purchases from the Company’s largest supplier totaled ~~26.4% and 27.0%~~25.5% of total expenses for the thirteen ~~and twenty-six~~ weeks ended ~~June 24, 2020, respectively,~~March 31, 2021, and ~~30.3% and 28.8%~~27.4% of total expenses for the thirteen ~~and twenty-six~~ weeks ended ~~June 26, 2019.~~March 25, 2020.

Company-operated and franchised restaurants in the greater Los Angeles area generated, in the aggregate, approximately ~~71.1% and 71.7%~~70.1% of total revenue for the thirteen ~~and twenty-six~~ weeks ended ~~June 24, 2020, respectively,~~March 31, 2021, and ~~69.3%~~72.4% for ~~each of~~ the thirteen ~~and twenty-six~~ weeks ended ~~June 26, 2019.~~March 25, 2020.

Goodwill and Indefinite Lived Intangible Assets

The Company’s indefinite-lived intangible assets consist of trademarks. Goodwill represents the excess of cost over fair value of net identified assets acquired in business combinations accounted for under the purchase method. The Company does not amortize its goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets. Goodwill resulted from the acquisition of certain franchise locations.

Upon the sale or closure of a restaurant, the Company evaluates whether there is a decrement of goodwill. The amount of goodwill included in the cost basis of the asset sold is determined based on the relative fair value of the portion of the reporting unit disposed of compared to the fair value of the reporting unit retained. The Company determined there was no decrement of goodwill related to the disposition of restaurants during the thirteen ~~and twenty-six~~ weeks ended ~~June 26, 2019.~~March 25, 2020.

~~Table of Contents~~

The Company performs an annual impairment test for goodwill during the fourth fiscal quarter of each year, or more frequently if impairment indicators arise.

The Company reviews goodwill for impairment utilizing either a qualitative assessment or a fair value test by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount. If the Company decides that it is appropriate to perform a qualitative assessment and concludes that the fair value of a reporting unit more likely than not exceeds its carrying value, no further evaluation is necessary. If the Company performs the fair value test, the Company will compare the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill. If the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, goodwill of the reporting unit is considered not impaired. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit

Table of Contents

exceeds its fair value, the Company will recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value; however, the loss recognized cannot exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit.

The Company performs an annual impairment test for indefinite-lived intangible assets during the fourth fiscal quarter of each year, or more frequently if impairment indicators arise. An impairment test consists of either a qualitative assessment or a comparison of the fair value of an intangible asset with its carrying amount. The excess of the carrying amount of an intangible asset over its fair value is recognized as an impairment loss.

The assumptions used in the estimate of fair value are generally consistent with the past performance of the Company’s reporting segment and are also consistent with the projections and assumptions that are used in current operating plans. These assumptions are subject to change as a result of changing economic and competitive conditions.

Due to the recent impact of the COVID-19 pandemic to the global economy, including but not limited to, the volatility of the Company’s stock price as well as that of its competitors and the challenging environment for the restaurant industry generally, theThe Company determined that there were no indicators of potential impairment of its goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets during the thirteen ~~and twenty-six~~ weeks ended June 24, 2020. As such, the Company performed an impairment assessment for both goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets and concluded that the fair value of these assets substantially exceeded their carrying values.March 31, 2021. Accordingly, the Company did not record any impairment to its goodwill or indefinite-lived intangible assets during the thirteen ~~and twenty-six~~ weeks ended ~~June 24, 2020.~~March 31, 2021. The ultimate severity and longevity of the COVID-19 pandemic is unknown, and therefore, it is possible that impairments could be identified in future periods, and such amounts could be material.

Fair Value Measurements

Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Financial assets and liabilities carried at fair value are classified and disclosed in one of the following three categories:

●

Level 1: Quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets.

●

Level 2: Observable prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations whose inputs or significant value drivers are observable.

●

Level 3: Unobservable inputs used when little or no market data is available.

During fiscal 2019, the Company entered into an interest rate swap, which is required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis. The fair value was determined based on Level 2 inputs, which include valuation models, as reported by the Company’s counterparty. These valuation models use a discounted cash flow analysis on the cash flows of the derivative based on the terms of the contract and the forward yield curves adjusted for the Company’s credit risk. The key inputs for the valuation models are observable market prices, discount rates, and forward yield curves. See ~~"Note 4.~~Note 4, “Long-Term Debt” for further discussion regarding our interest rate swaps.

The following table presents fair value for the interest rate swap at March 31, 2021 (in thousands):


			Fair Value Measurements Using
	Fair Value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Other non-current liabilities - Interest rate swap	$	946	$	0	$	946	$	0

The following table presents fair value for the interest rate swap at December 30, 2020 (in thousands):


			Fair Value Measurements Using
		Fair Value	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Other non-current liabilities - Interest rate swap	$	1,139	$	—	$	1,139	$	—

Certain assets and liabilities are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. In other words, the instruments are not measured at fair value on an ongoing basis, but are subject to fair value adjustments only in certain circumstances (e.g., when there is evidence of impairment).

1311

Table of Contents

~~Long-Term Debt" for further discussion regarding our interest rate swaps. The following table presents fair value for the interest rate swap at June 24, 2020 (in thousands):~~

Fair Value Measurements Using


Fair Value

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3
Other non-current liabilities - Interest rate swap

$
1,408

$
—

$
1,408

$
—

~~The following table presents fair value for the interest rate swap at December 25, 2019 (in thousands):~~

Fair Value Measurements Using


Fair Value

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3
Other assets - Interest rate swap

$
360

$
—

$
360

$
—

The following non-financial instruments were measured at fair value, on a nonrecurring basis, as of and for the thirteen ~~and twenty-six~~ weeks ended ~~June 24, 2020~~March 31, 2021 reflecting certain property and equipment assets and right-of-use (“ROU”) assets, for which an impairment loss was recognized during the corresponding periods, as discussed immediately below under “Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and ROU Assets” (in thousands):


									Thirteen Weeks		Twenty-Six Weeks		Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Impairment Losses
			Fair Value Measurements at June 24, 2020 Using						Ended June 24, 2020		Ended June 24, 2020
	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Impairment Losses		Impairment Losses
Certain property and equipment owned, net	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	52	$	1,429
Certain property and equipment, net													$	—	$	0	$	0	$	—	$	240
Certain ROU assets, net	$	918	$	—	$	—	$	918	$	—	$	543	$	1,147	$	0	$	0	$	1,147	$	63

The following non-financial instruments were measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis as of and for the thirteen ~~and twenty-six~~ weeks ended ~~June 26, 2019~~March 25, 2020 reflecting certain property and equipment assets for which an impairment loss was recognized during the corresponding periods, as discussed immediately below under “Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and ROU Assets” (in thousands):


									Thirteen Weeks		Twenty-Six Weeks		Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Impairment Losses
			Fair Value Measurements at June 26, 2019 Using						Ended June 26, 2019		Ended June 26, 2019
	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Impairment Losses		Impairment Losses
Certain property and equipment owned, net	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	227	$	227
Certain property and equipment, net													$	39	$	—	$	—	$	39	$	1,377
Certain ROU assets, net													$	926						926		543

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and ROU Assets

The Company reviews its long-lived and ~~right-of-use~~ROU assets ~~("ROU assets")~~ for impairment on a restaurant-by-restaurant basis whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of certain long-lived and ROU assets may not be recoverable. The Company considers a triggering event related to long-lived assets or ROU assets in a net asset position to have occurred related to a specific restaurant if the restaurant’s cash flows for the last twelve months are less than a minimum threshold or if consistent levels of undiscounted cash flows for the remaining lease period are less than the carrying value of the restaurant’s assets. Additionally, the Company considers a triggering event related to ROU assets to have occurred related to a specific lease if the location has been subleased and future estimated sublease income is less than ~~current~~ lease ~~payments.~~payments under the head lease. If the Company concludes that the carrying value of certain long-lived and ROU assets will not be recovered based on expected undiscounted future cash flows, an impairment loss is recorded to reduce the long-lived or ROU assets to their estimated fair value. The fair value is measured on a nonrecurring basis using unobservable (Level 3) inputs. There is uncertainty in the projected undiscounted future cash flows used in the Company’s impairment review analysis, which requires the use of estimates and assumptions. If actual performance does not achieve the projections, or if the assumptions used change in the future, the Company may be required to recognize impairment charges in future periods, and such charges could be material. The Company determined that triggering events occurred for certain restaurants during ~~each of~~ the thirteen ~~and twenty-six~~ weeks ended ~~June 24, 2020~~March 31, 2021 that required an impairment review of certain of the Company’s long-lived and ROU assets. Based on the results of the analysis, the Company recorded non-cash impairment charges of ~~$0.1 million and $2.0~~$0.3 million for the thirteen ~~and twenty-six~~ weeks ended ~~June 24, 2020, respectively,~~March 31, 2021, primarily related to the carrying value of the ROU assets of 1 restaurant in Texas closed in 2019 and the long-lived assets of 3 restaurants in California.

~~Table of Contents~~

The Company recorded a non-cash impairment charge of ~~$0.2~~$1.9 million for ~~both~~ the thirteen ~~and twenty-six~~ weeks ended ~~June 26, 2019,~~March 25, 2020, primarily related to the carrying value of the ROU assets of 1 restaurant in California and the long-lived assets of 3 restaurants in California. Given the inherent uncertainty in projecting results for newer restaurants in newer markets, as well as the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Company is monitoring the recoverability of the carrying value of the assets of several restaurants on an ongoing basis. For these restaurants, if expected performance is not realized, an impairment charge may be recognized in future periods, and such charge could be material.

Closed-Store Reserves

When a restaurant is closed, the Company will evaluate the ROU asset for impairment, based on anticipated sublease recoveries. The remaining value of the ROU asset is amortized on a straight-line basis, with the expense recognized in closed-store reserve expense. Additionally, any property tax and common area maintenance ~~("CAM"~~(“CAM”) payments relating to closed restaurants are included within closed-store expense. During the thirteen ~~and twenty-six~~ weeks ended ~~June 24, 2020,~~March 31, 2021, the Company recognized ~~$0.4 million and $0.9~~$0.3 million of closed-store reserve expense related to the amortization of ROU assets, property taxes and CAM payments for its closed locations. During the ~~twenty-six~~thirteen weeks ended ~~June 26, 2019,~~March 25, 2020, the Company ~~closed 1 restaurant in California and 1 restaurant in Texas, and~~

Table of Contents

recognized ~~$0.3 million and $0.6~~$0.5 million of closed-store reserve expense, ~~for the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 26, 2019, respectively,~~ primarily related to the amortization of ROU assets, property taxes and CAM payments for its closed locations.

Derivative Financial Instruments

The Company uses an interest rate swap, a derivative instrument, to hedge interest rate risk and not for trading purposes. The derivative contract is entered into with a financial institution.

The Company records the derivative instrument on its condensed consolidated balance ~~sheet~~sheets at fair value. The derivative instrument qualifies as a hedging instrument in a qualifying cash flow hedge relationship, and the gain or loss on the derivative instrument is reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income ~~("AOCI"~~(“AOCI”) and reclassified into earnings in the same period or periods during which the hedged transaction affects earnings. For any derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments, the gain or loss will be recognized in earnings immediately. If a derivative previously designated as a hedge is terminated, or no longer meets the qualifications for hedge accounting, any balances in AOCI will be reclassified to earnings immediately.

As a result of the use of an interest rate swap, the Company is exposed to risk that the counterparty will fail to meet their contractual obligations. To mitigate the counterparty credit risk, the Company will only enter into contracts with major financial institutions, based upon their credit ratings and other factors, and will continue to assess the creditworthiness of the counterparty. As of ~~June 24, 2020,~~March 31, 2021, the counterparty to the Company’s interest rate swap has performed in accordance with its contractual obligation.

Income Taxes

The provision for income taxes, income taxes payable and deferred income taxes is determined using the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on temporary differences between the financial carrying amounts and the tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect in the years in which the temporary differences are expected to reverse. On a periodic basis, the Company assesses the probability that its net deferred tax assets, if any, will be recovered. If, after evaluating all of the positive and negative evidence, a conclusion is made that it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the net deferred tax assets will not be recovered, a valuation allowance is provided by charging to tax expense toa reserve for the portion of deferred tax assets which are not expected to be realized.

The Company reviews its filing positions for all open tax years in all U.S. federal and state jurisdictions where the Company is required to file.

When there are uncertainties related to potential income tax benefits, in order to qualify for recognition, the position the Company takes has to have at least a “more likely than not” chance of being sustained (based on the position’s technical merits) upon challenge by the respective authorities. The term “more likely than not” means a likelihood of more than 50 percent. Otherwise, the Company may not recognize any of the potential tax benefit associated with the position. The

~~Table of Contents~~

Company recognizes a benefit for a tax position that meets the “more likely than not” criterion at the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50 percent likely of being realized upon its effective resolution. Unrecognized tax benefits involve management’s judgment regarding the likelihood of the benefit being sustained. The final resolution of uncertain tax positions could result in adjustments to recorded amounts and may affect the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations, and cash flows.

The Company’s policy is to recognize interest and penalties related to income tax matters in income tax expense. The Company had 0 accrual for interest or penalties at ~~June 24, 2020~~March 31, 2021 or at December ~~25, 2019, and~~30, 2020. During fiscal 2020 the Company recognized interest of $0.1 million related to the Notice of Proposed Adjustment (“NOPA”), discussed below. The Company did not recognize interest or penalties during the thirteen ~~and twenty-six~~ weeks ended ~~June 24,~~March 25, 2020, ~~or June 26, 2019,~~ since there were no material unrecognized tax benefits. Management believes no ~~material~~significant changes to the amount of unrecognized tax benefits will occur within the next twelve months.

On July 30, 2014, the Company entered into the income tax receivable agreement (the ~~"TRA"~~“TRA”), which calls for the Company to pay to its ~~pre-IPO~~pre-initial public offering (“IPO”) stockholders 85% of the savings in cash that the Company realizes in its income taxes as a result of utilizing its net operating losses (“NOLs”) and other tax attributes attributable to preceding periods. For the thirteen ~~and twenty-six~~ weeks ended ~~June 24, 2020,~~March 31, 2021, the Company recorded income tax receivable

Table of Contents

agreement ~~expense~~income of ~~$0.3~~less than $0.1 million, ~~and $0.2 million, respectively,~~ and for the thirteen ~~and twenty-six~~ weeks ended ~~June 26, 2019,~~March 25, 2020, the Company recorded income tax receivable agreement income of $0.1 million, ~~and income tax receivable expense of $0.1 million, respectively,~~ related to the amortization of interest expense related to ~~our~~the total expected TRA payments and changes in estimates for actual tax returns filed and future forecasted taxable income.

On March 27, 2020, President Trump signed into a law a stimulus package, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security ~~("CARES"~~Act (the “CARES Act”) ~~Act,~~, which contains several tax provisions and deferral of employer Social Security taxes that are otherwise owed for wage payments. The tax provisions include a correction of a previous drafting error related to quality improvement property ~~("QIP"~~(“QIP”) and immediate refundability of all remaining alternative minimum tax ~~("AMT"~~(“AMT”) credits. The new provisions did not have a material impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.

During the ~~twenty-six~~thirteen weeks ended ~~June 24,~~March 25, 2020, the Company received a ~~Notice of Proposed Adjustment ("NOPA"),~~NOPA for the years ended December 27, 2017 and December 28, 2016, related to the Company’s methodology regarding its ordering of utilization of AMT ~~net operating losses ("NOL”).~~NOL. This resulted in payment of $0.4 million, and the audit is closed. As a result of the CARES Act, discussed above, this amount is immediately refundable upon filing of a Form 1139, which the Company filed during ~~the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 24,~~fiscal 2020 and recognized a receivable, included in Accounts and other receivables within the condensed consolidated balance sheet as of ~~June 24, 2020.~~March 31, 2021. Subsequent to March 31, 2021, the Company received a refund totaling $0.5 million.

2. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

The costs and related accumulated depreciation and amortization of major classes of property and equipment are as follows (in thousands):


	June 24, 2020		December 25, 2019		March 31, 2021		December 30, 2020
Land	$	12,323	$	12,323	$	12,323	$	12,323
Buildings and improvements		147,048		144,794		149,923		147,939
Other property and equipment		75,604		75,234		78,449		77,177
Construction in progress		1,443		4,213		4,318		3,567
		236,418		236,564		245,013		241,006
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization		(152,156)		(144,786)		(164,954)		(161,364)
	$	84,262	$	91,778	$	80,059	$	79,642

Depreciation expense was ~~$4.2~~$3.9 million and ~~$4.5~~$4.4 million for the thirteen weeks ended ~~June 24,~~March 31, 2021 and March 25, 2020, ~~and June 26, 2019, respectively, and~~ ~~$8.5 million and $9.2 million for the twenty-six weeks ended June 24, 2020 and June 26, 2019, respectively~~.respectively.

Based on the Company’s review of its long-lived assets for impairment, the Company recorded non-cash impairment charges of ~~$0.1 million and $1.4~~$0.2 million for the thirteen ~~and twenty-six~~ weeks ended ~~June 24, 2020, respectively,~~March 31, 2021, primarily related to the carrying value of the assets of 3 restaurants in California. During the thirteen ~~and twenty-six~~ weeks ended ~~June 26, 2019,~~March 25, 2020, the Company recorded non-cash impairment charges of ~~$0.2~~$1.4 million, primarily related to

~~Table of Contents~~

the carrying value of ~~1 restaurant~~the assets of 3 restaurants in California. Depending on the severity and longevity of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Company’s financial performance could be further impacted and it is possible that material impairments could be identified in future periods. See Note 1, “Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies – Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and ROU Assets” for additional information.

3. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

At ~~June 24, 2020,~~March 31, 2021, options to purchase ~~1,641,851~~969,447 shares of common stock were outstanding, including ~~1,258,437~~623,588 that are vested and ~~383,414~~345,859 that are unvested. Unvested options vest over time; however, upon a change in control, the Board of Directors may accelerate vesting. At ~~June 24, 2020, 820,342~~March 31, 2021, 260,967 premium options, which are options granted above the stock price at date of grant, remained outstanding. A summary of stock option activity as of ~~June 24, 2020~~March 31, 2021 and changes during the ~~twenty-six~~thirteen weeks ended ~~June 24, 2020~~March 31, 2021 is as follows:

Weighted-Average

Shares

Exercise Price
Outstanding - December 25, 2019

2,077,570

$
8.14
Exercised

(372,556)

5.81
Forfeited, cancelled or expired

(63,163)

11.56
Outstanding - June 24, 2020

1,641,851

$
8.53
Vested and expected to vest at June 24, 2020

1,635,204

$
8.52
Exercisable at June 24, 2020

1,258,437

$
7.66


				Weighted-Average	Aggregate
		Weighted-Average		Contractual Life	Intrinsic Value
	Shares	Exercise Price		Life (Years)	(in thousands)
Outstanding - December 30, 2020	1,030,866	$	9.82
Exercised	(61,419)		5.31

Table of Contents

Outstanding - March 31, 2021	969,447	$	10.10	5.51	$	5,884
Vested and expected to vest at March 31, 2021	966,137	$	10.10	5.50	$	5,868
Exercisable at March 31, 2021	623,588	$	9.39	4.29	$	4,212

At ~~June 24, 2020,~~March 31, 2021, the Company had total unrecognized compensation expense of ~~$1.3~~$0.9 million related to unvested stock options, which it expects to recognize over a weighted-average period of ~~2.46~~1.77 years.

A summary of restricted share activity as of ~~June 24, 2020~~March 31, 2021 and changes during the ~~twenty-six~~thirteen weeks ended ~~June 24, 2020~~March 31, 2021 is as follows:


		Weighted-Average			Weighted-Average
	Shares	Fair Value		Shares	Fair Value
Unvested shares at December 25, 2019	588,008	$	11.23
Granted	412,224	$	12.46
Released	(108,714)	$	11.79
Unvested shares at December 30, 2020				742,404	$	11.68
Forfeited, cancelled, or expired	(73,497)	$	12.21	(6,241)	$	12.02
Unvested shares at June 24, 2020	818,021	$	11.69
Unvested shares at March 31, 2021				736,163	$	11.68

Unvested shares at ~~June 24, 2020,~~March 31, 2021, included ~~733,885~~652,027 unvested restricted shares, 36,058 unvested performance stock units and 48,078 unvested restricted units.

At ~~June 24, 2020,~~March 31, 2021, the Company had unrecognized compensation expense of ~~$8.0~~$5.6 million related to unvested restricted shares, which it expects to recognize over a weighted-average period of ~~3.22~~2.58 years, unrecognized compensation expense of $0.1 million related to performance stock units, which it expects to recognize over a weighted-average period of ~~2.87~~2.11 years and unrecognized compensation expense of ~~$0.5~~$0.3 million related to unvested restricted units, which it expects to recognize over a weighted-average period of ~~1.87~~1.11 years.

Total stock-based compensation expense was ~~$0.7 million and $1.3~~$0.9 million for the thirteen ~~and twenty-six~~ weeks ended ~~June 24, 2020, respectively,~~March 31, 2021, and ~~$0.6 million and $1.1~~$0.5 million for the thirteen ~~and twenty-six~~ weeks ended ~~June 26, 2019, respectively.~~March 25, 2020.

4. LONG-TERM DEBT

On July 13, 2018, the Company refinanced a credit agreement with Bank of America, N.A., initially entered into on December 11, 2014 (the “2014 Revolver”), pursuant to a credit agreement (the “2018 Credit Agreement”) among EPL, as borrower, and the Company and Intermediate, as guarantors, Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent, swingline lender, and letter of credit issuer, the lenders party thereto, and the other parties thereto, which provides for a $150.0 million five-year senior secured revolving credit facility (the “2018 Revolver”). The 2018 Revolver includes a sub limit of $15.0 million for letters of credit and a sub limit of $15.0 million for swingline loans. The 2018 Revolver and 2018 Credit Agreement will mature on July 13, 2023. The obligations under the 2018 Credit Agreement and related

~~Table of Contents~~

loan documents are guaranteed by the Company and Intermediate. The obligations of the Company, EPL and Intermediate under the 2018 Credit Agreement and related loan documents are secured by a first priority lien on substantially all of their respective assets.

Under the 2018 Revolver, Holdings may not make certain payments such as cash dividends, except that it may, inter alia, (i) pay up to $1.0 million per year to repurchase or redeem qualified equity interests of Holdings held by past or present officers, directors, or employees (or their estates) of the Company upon death, disability, or termination of employment, (ii) pay under its TRA, and (iii) so long as no default or event of default has occurred and is continuing, (a) make non-cash repurchases of equity interests in connection with the exercise of stock options by directors, officers and management, provided that those equity interests represent a portion of the consideration of the exercise price of those stock options, (b) pay up to $0.5 million in any 12 month consecutive period to redeem, repurchase or otherwise acquire equity interests of any subsidiary that is not a wholly-owned subsidiary from any holder of equity interest in such subsidiary, (c) pay up to $2.5 million per year pursuant to stock option plans, employment agreements, or incentive plans, (d) make up to $5.0 million in other restricted payments per year, and (e) make other restricted payments, subject to its compliance, on a pro forma basis, with (x) a lease-adjusted consolidated leverage ratio not to exceed 4.25 times and (y) the financial covenants applicable to the 2018 Revolver.

Table of Contents

rate plus 0.50%, (b) the published Bank of America prime rate, or (c) LIBOR plus 1.00%. For LIBOR loans, the margin is in the range of 1.25% to 2.25%, and for base rate loans the margin is in a range of 0.25% to 1.25%. Borrowings under the 2018 Revolver may be repaid and reborrowed. The interest rate range was ~~1.67%~~1.36% to ~~3.11%~~1.65% for the thirteen weeks ended March 31, 2021 respectively, and ~~1.67%~~3.11% to 3.29% for the thirteen ~~and twenty-six~~ weeks ended ~~June 24, 2020, respectively, and 3.90% to 6.00% for both the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 26, 2019.~~March 25, 2020.

The 2018 Credit Agreement contains certain financial covenants. The Company was in compliance with the financial covenants as of ~~June 24, 2020.~~March 31, 2021. However, depending on the severity and longevity of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Company’s financial performance and liquidity could be further impacted and could impact the Company’s ability to comply with certain financial covenants required in the 2018 Credit Agreement, specifically the lease-adjusted coverage ratio and fixed-charge coverage ratio.

At ~~June 24, 2020, $11.1~~March 31, 2021, $8.4 million of letters of credit and ~~$138.8~~$53.8 million in borrowings under the 2018 Revolver were outstanding. The Company had ~~$0.1~~$87.8 million in borrowing availability under the 2018 Revolver at ~~June 24, 2020.~~March 31, 2021.

Maturities

During the thirteen weeks ended ~~June 24, 2020,~~March 31, 2021, the Company elected to pay down ~~$2.7~~$9.0 million on its 2018 Revolver. During the ~~twenty-six~~thirteen weeks ended ~~June 24,~~March 25, 2020, the Company borrowed ~~$41.8~~$44.5 million, net of pay downs of ~~$10.7~~$8.0 million on ~~its~~the Company’s 2018 Revolver, primarily as a precautionary measure to bolster its existing cash position, related to the uncertainty regarding the ~~current~~ COVID-19 pandemic, as well as to fund litigation settlement payments. See Note 1 under "COVID-19" for further details regarding the Company’s actions related to the COVID-19 pandemic and Note 7 for further details regarding the litigation settlement payments. During the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 26, 2019, the Company borrowed $14.0 million and $11.0 million, respectively, net of pay downs of $12.0 and $15.0 million of outstanding borrowings on the Company’s 2018 Revolver, primarily to fund settlement payments. There are 0 required principal payments prior to maturity for the 2018 Revolver.

Interest Rate Swap

During the year ended December 25, 2019, the Company entered into a variable-to-fixed interest rate swap agreement with a notional amount of $40.0 million that matures in June 2023. The objective of the interest rate swap was to reduce the Company’s exposure to interest rate risk for a portion of its variable-rate interest payments on its borrowings under the 2018 Revolver. Under the terms of the swap agreement, the variable LIBOR-based component of interest payments was converted to a fixed rate of 1.31%, plus applicable margin, which ~~is currently~~was 1.5%. for the thirteen weeks ended March 31, 2021. The interest rate swap was designated as a cash flow hedge, as the changes in the future cash flows of the swap were expected to offset changes in expected future interest payments on the related variable-rate debt, in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 815 “Derivatives and Hedging.”

~~Table of Contents~~

The changes in the fair value of the interest rate swap are not included in earnings, but are included in other comprehensive (loss) income (“OCI”). These changes in fair value are subsequently reclassified into net earnings as a component of interest expense as the hedged interest payments are made on the variable rate borrowings.

For the thirteen ~~and twenty-six~~ weeks ended ~~June 24, 2020,~~March 31, 2021, the swap was a highly effective cash flow hedge.

As of ~~June 24, 2020,~~March 31, 2021, the estimated net loss included in AOCI related to the Company’s cash flow hedge that will be reclassified into earnings in the next 12 months is $0.5 million, based on current LIBOR interest rates.

The following table shows the financial statement line item and amount of the Company’s cash flow hedge accounting on the condensed consolidated balance ~~sheet~~sheets (in thousands):


	June 24, 2020				December 25, 2019				March 31, 2021				December 30, 2020
	Notional		Fair value		Notional		Fair value		Notional		Fair value		Notional		Fair value
Other assets - Interest rate swap		—		—	$	40,000	$	360
Other liabilities - Interest rate swap	$	40,000	$	1,408		—		—	$	40,000	$	946	$	40,000	$	1,139

Table of Contents

The following table summarizes the effect of the Company’s cash flow hedge accounting on the condensed consolidated statements of income (in thousands):


	Thirteen Weeks Ended				Twenty-Six Weeks Ended				Thirteen Weeks Ended
	June 24, 2020		June 26, 2019		June 24, 2020		June 26, 2019		March 31, 2021		March 25, 2020
Interest expense on hedged portion of debt	$	212		—	$	641		—	$	200	$	429
Interest expense on interest rate swap		81		—		42		—
Interest expense (income) on interest rate swap										78		(39)
Interest expense on debt and derivatives, net	$	293	$	—	$	683	$	—	$	278	$	390

The following table summarizes the effect of the Company’s cash flow hedge accounting on AOCI for the thirteen ~~and twenty-six~~ weeks ended ~~June 24,~~March 31, 2021 and March 25, 2020 ~~and June 26, 2019~~ (in thousands):


	Thirteen Weeks Ended						Twenty-Six Weeks Ended						Thirteen Weeks Ended
				Loss Reclassified from						Loss Reclassified from						Loss (Gain) Reclassified from
	Net Loss Recognized in OCI			AOCI into Interest expense			Net Loss Recognized in OCI			AOCI into Interest expense			Net (Loss) Gain Recognized in OCI			AOCI into Interest expense
	June 24, 2020		June 26, 2019	June 24, 2020		June 26, 2019	June 24, 2020		June 26, 2019	June 24, 2020		June 26, 2019	March 31, 2021		March 25, 2020	March 31, 2021		March 25, 2020
Interest rate swap	$	296	—	$	81	—	$	1,755	—	$	42	—	$	78	1,459	$	115	(39)

See Note 1, “Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” for information about the fair value of ~~our~~the Company’s derivative asset.

5. OTHER ACCRUED EXPENSES AND CURRENT LIABILITIES

Other accrued expenses and current liabilities consist of the following (in thousands):


	June 24, 2020		December 25, 2019		March 31, 2021		December 30, 2020
Accrued sales and property taxes	$	3,618	$	4,665	$	5,259	$	5,216
Gift card liability		2,811		3,006		3,386		4,008
Accrued legal settlements and professional fees		3,326		16,901		919		321
Deferred franchise and development fees		592		705		547		503
Current portion of lease payment deferrals		2,523		—		1,150		1,793
Current portion of employer social security tax deferral						2,426		—
Other		3,506		3,320		3,900		4,874
Total other accrued expenses and current liabilities	$	16,376	$	28,597	$	17,587	$	16,715

~~Table of Contents~~

6. OTHER NONCURRENT LIABILITIES

Other noncurrent liabilities consist of the following (in thousands):


	June 24, 2020		December 25, 2019		March 31, 2021		December 30, 2020
Deferred franchise and development fees	$	5,181	$	5,612	$	5,095	$	5,125
Derivative liability		1,367		—		946		1,139
Lease payment deferrals - net of current portion		805		—
Employer social security tax deferral						2,426		4,853
Other		1,625		67		166		175
Total other noncurrent liabilities	$	8,978	$	5,679	$	8,633	$	11,292

7. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Legal Matters

On or about February 24, 2014, a former employee filed a class action in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Orange, under the caption Elliott Olvera, et al v. El Pollo Loco, Inc., et al (Case No. 30-2014-00707367-CU-OE-CXC) on behalf of all putative class members (all hourly employees from 2010 to the present) alleging certain violations of California labor laws, including failure to pay overtime compensation, failure to provide meal periods and rest breaks, and failure to provide itemized wage statements. The putative lead plaintiff’s requested remedies include compensatory and punitive damages, injunctive relief, disgorgement of profits, and reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs.

Table of Contents

NaN specific amount of damages sought was specified in the complaint. The court recently certified ~~two~~2 classes of plaintiffs - one class encompasses restaurant employees who were not provided proper rest breaks because they were not allowed to leave the premises during their breaks and the other class encompasses restaurant employees who were required to wait at the restaurant after they finished working for the night until the manager set the alarm for safety purposes. The parties reached a settlement in principle on January 24, 2019 of all claims brought on behalf of the 32,000+ putative class members in ~~the~~ Olvera, as well as all claims for failure to pay overtime compensation, failure to provide meal periods and rest breaks, and failure to provide itemized wage statements brought in the class actions captioned Martha Perez v. El Pollo Loco, Inc. (Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. BC624001), Maria Vega, et al. v. El Pollo Loco, Inc. (Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. BC649719), and Gonzalez v. El Pollo Loco, Inc. (Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. BC712867). The settlement reached in principle in the Olvera, Perez, Vega, and Gonzalez actions resolves all potential claims from April 12, 2010 through April 1, 2019 that El Pollo Loco restaurant employees may have against El Pollo Loco for failure to pay for all compensation owed, failure to pay overtime compensation, failure to provide meal periods and rest breaks and failure to provide itemized wage statements, among other wage and hour related claims. A $16.3 million accrual of an expected settlement amount related to this matter was recorded as of December 26, 2018, and the court formally approved the settlement on January 31, 2020. The settlement payment was made on February 28, 2020. Purported class actions alleging wage and hour violations are commonly filed against California employers. The Company fully expects to have to defend against similar lawsuits in the future.

~~Daniel Turocy, et al. v. El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc., et al.~~ ~~(Case No. 8:15-cv-01343) was filed in the United States District Court for the Central District of California on August 24, 2015, and~~ ~~Ron Huston, et al. v. El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc., et al.~~ (Case No. 8:15-cv-01710) was filed in the United States District Court for the Central District of California on October 22, 2015. The 2 lawsuits have been consolidated, with co-lead plaintiffs and class counsel. A consolidated complaint was filed on January 29, 2016, on behalf of co-lead plaintiffs and others similarly situated, alleging violations of federal securities laws in connection with Holdings common stock purchased or otherwise acquired and the purchase of call options or the sale of put options, between May 1, 2015 and August 13, 2015 (the “Class Period”). The named defendants are Holdings; Stephen J. Sather, Laurance Roberts, and Edward J. Valle (collectively, the “Individual Defendants”); and Trimaran Pollo Partners, LLC, Trimaran Capital Partners, and Freeman Spogli & Co. (collectively, the “Controlling Shareholder Defendants”). Among other things, Plaintiffs allege that, in 2014 and early 2015, Holdings suffered losses due to rising labor costs in California and, in an attempt to mitigate the effects of such rising costs, removed a $5 value option from the Company’s menu, which resulted in a decrease in traffic from value-conscious consumers. Plaintiffs further allege that during the Class Period, Holdings and the Individual Defendants made a series of materially false and misleading statements that concealed the effect that these factors were having on store sales growth, resulting in Holdings stock continuing to be traded at artificially inflated prices. As a result, Plaintiffs and other members of the putative class allegedly suffered damages in connection with their purchase of Holdings’ stock during the Class Period. In addition, Plaintiffs allege that the Individual Defendants and Controlling Shareholder Defendants had direct involvement in, and responsibility over, the operations of Holdings, and are presumed

~~Table of Contents~~

to have had, among other things, the power to control or influence the transactions giving rise to the alleged securities law violations. In both cases, Plaintiffs seek an unspecified amount of damages, as well as costs and expenses (including attorneys’ fees).

On July 25, 2016, the Court issued an order granting, without prejudice, Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss plaintiff’s complaint for failure to state a claim. Plaintiffs were granted leave to amend their complaint, and filed an amended complaint on August 22, 2016. Defendants moved to dismiss the amended complaint, and on March 20, 2017, the Court dismissed the amended complaint and granted Plaintiffs leave to file another amended complaint. Plaintiffs filed another amended complaint on April 17, 2017. Defendants filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint on or about May 17, 2017. The Court denied Defendants’ motion to dismiss the third amended complaint on August 4, 2017. On December 8, 2017, Plaintiffs filed a motion for class certification, and on July 3, 2018, the Court granted Plaintiffs’ motion and certified a class as to all of Plaintiffs’ claims. Defendants filed a petition for appellate review of a portion of the Court’s July 3, 2018 class certification order. On October 19, 2018 the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals denied the petition.

On January 23, 2019, the parties filed a Notice of Settlement and Joint Request for Order to Stay Proceedings, stating the parties have reached an agreement in principle to settle the claims and allegations in the action and are negotiating the terms of a Stipulation of Settlement. On January 24, 2019, the Court ordered that all proceedings in the action be stayed until April 3, 2019, on or before which the parties were to file and did so file a Stipulation of Settlement and a motion for preliminary approval of the settlement. The court granted preliminary approval of the settlement on May 13, 2019. Defendants maintain that the Plaintiffs’ claims are without merit, and entered into the settlement with Plaintiffs to eliminate the uncertainties, burden and expense of further protracted litigation. A $20.0 million accrual of an expected settlement amount related to this matter was recorded as of December 26, 2018 and all settlement payments were made during the year ended December 25, 2019.

On or about November 5, 2015, a purported Holdings shareholder filed a derivative complaint on behalf of Holdings in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware against certain Holdings officers, directors and Trimaran Pollo Partners, L.L.C., under the caption Armen Galustyan v. Sather, et al. (Case No. 11676-VCL). The derivative complaint alleges that these defendants breached their fiduciary duties to Holdings and were unjustly enriched when they sold shares of Holdings at artificially inflated prices due to alleged misrepresentations and omissions regarding EPL’s comparable store sales in the second quarter of 2015. The Holdings shareholder’s requested remedies include an award of compensatory damages to Holdings, as well as a court order to improve corporate governance by putting forward for stockholder vote certain resolutions for amendments to Holdings’ Bylaws or Certificate of Incorporation. The ~~parties have stipulated to, which~~Holdings shareholder voluntarily dismissed the ~~court has ordered, a stay of these proceedings pending the outcome of~~ ~~Turocy v. El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc., discussed above.~~action on October 7, 2020. A second purported Holdings shareholder filed a derivative complaint on or about September 23, 2016, under the caption Diep v. Sather, CA 12760-VCL in the Delaware Court of Chancery. The Diep action is also purportedly brought on behalf of Holdings, names the same defendants and asserts substantially the same claims on substantially the same alleged facts as does Galustyan. Defendants moved to stay or dismiss the Diep action.

On March 17, 2017, the Delaware court granted in part, and denied in part, the motion to stay the Diep action. The court denied defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim. On January 17, 2018, the court entered an order granting the parties’ stipulation staying all proceedings in the Diep action for five months or until the completion of an investigation of the allegations in the action by a special litigation committee of the Holdings board of directors (the ~~"SLC"~~“SLC”). On February 13, 2019, after concluding its investigation, the SLC filed a motion to dismiss the Diep action. The SLC filed its investigative report under seal as an exhibit to the motion to dismiss. ~~Discovery~~Following discovery related to the SLC’s motion, on September 25, 2020, the SLC filed a motion to dismiss the Diep action. On April 23, 2021, the court held a hearing on the SLC’s motion to dismiss, and the court’s ruling is ~~ongoing.~~pending. The Company believes that a loss is currently not probable or estimable under ASC 450, "Contingencies", and as of March 31, 2021 0 accrual has been made with regard to this case.

Janice P. Handlers-Bryman and Michael D. Bryman v. El Pollo Loco, Inc., Los Angeles Superior Court (Case No. MC026045) (the “Lancaster Lawsuit”) was filed on February 9, 2016. Existing El Pollo Loco franchisees, Janice P. Handlers-Bryman and Michael D. Bryman, as individuals and in their capacities as trustees of the Handlers Bryman Trust (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), filed suit against us alleging, among other things, that we “imposed unreasonable time limitations” on their development of additional restaurant locations in Lancaster, California, and that we thereafter developed company-operated El Pollo Loco restaurants in the “market area” of Plaintiffs’ existing El Pollo Loco restaurant in Lancaster. Plaintiffs asserted claims against us for, among other things, (i) breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, (ii) intentional interference with prospective business, and (iii) unfair business practices. In addition to an unspecified amount of damages and costs of the lawsuit, Plaintiffs sought reformation of the contract, declaratory relief, disgorgement of alleged revenues and profits, injunctive relief, and a judicial mandate requiring us to either transfer the company-operated locations to Plaintiffs or to continuously disgorge to Plaintiffs the unjust

~~Table of Contents~~

enrichment allegedly obtained by us through the operation of the company-operated restaurants in Lancaster. We denied Plaintiffs’ allegations as the franchise agreement did not grant Plaintiffs any exclusive territorial rights and, instead, expressly reserved for us the right to open and operate - and the right to grant others the right to open and operate - El

Table of Contents

Pollo Loco restaurants “in the immediate vicinity of or adjacent to” Plaintiffs’ restaurant in Lancaster. On April 24, 2017, four days before the commencement of trial, Plaintiffs filed a voluntary dismissal, without prejudice, of the Lancaster Lawsuit without any payment or other concession by us. The corresponding dismissal was entered by the court on April 25, 2017. On May 22, 2017, Plaintiffs filed a motion for relief from the dismissal which was granted by the court on June 29, 2017. The trial in the case was bifurcated between the liability and damages phases. The liability phase commenced on November 16, 2017. The only cause of action that the court allowed to go to the jury was the cause of action for breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing. The court elected not to present the cause of action for intentional interference with prospective business to the jury. (The causes of action for reformation due to mistake and unconscionability, unfair business practices under California Business & Professions Code §17200 et seq., and declaratory relief were not presented to the jury as these types of equitable claims are to be decided by the court as a matter of law.) On December 11, 2017, the jury returned a verdict in favor of Plaintiffs finding that the Company breached the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing by (1) constructing the 2 new company-operated El Pollo Loco restaurants in Lancaster, and (2) not offering the 2 new company-operated El Pollo Loco restaurants in Lancaster to Plaintiffs. Because the trial was bifurcated, the December 11, 2017 verdict did not include a determination of damages.

The damages phase of the trial commenced on April 20, 2018. On May 1, 2018, the jury returned a verdict on damages in favor of Plaintiffs in the following amounts: (1) $4,356,600 in “impact damages” arising out of our construction of the 2 new company-owned El Pollo Loco restaurants in Lancaster, and (2) $4,481,206 in “lost opportunity damages” arising out of our failure to offer the 2 new company-operated El Pollo Loco restaurants in Lancaster to Plaintiffs. On August 1, 2018, the court issued a final judgment and decision on the unfair business practices claim under California Business & Professions Code § 17200 et seq. As part of the final judgment, the court found El Pollo Loco liable and issued injunctive relief requiring El Pollo Loco to revise its franchise disclosure document and franchise agreement. The court also awarded Plaintiffs restitution of $4,356,600 for “impact damages” arising out of our construction of the 2 new company-operated El Pollo Loco restaurants in Lancaster. The court, reversing its previous position, held that these damages could be awarded in addition to the ~~"lost~~“lost opportunity ~~damages"~~damages” awarded by the jury. Thus, the court entered a total monetary judgment of $8,837,806. There was no ruling on the causes of action for reformation due to mistake and declaratory relief, and on January 27, 2020, the court entered an amended judgment dismissing these claims. The trial court subsequently awarded the Plaintiffs $249,728 in costs and $1,391,703 in attorney fees. Post judgment interest is running at 10% simple interest per year on the total amount of the monetary judgment, costs, and attorney fees.

On August 27, 2018, the Company filed a notice of appeal as to the entire judgment. As required by California law, on or about August 16, 2018, the Company obtained an appeal bond through a Surety company to secure the trial court’s judgment during the pendency of the appeal. ~~The appeal on the merits is currently pending, but has been stayed pending the Parties’ agreement in principle to settle the matter, discussed immediately below.~~

On March 19, 2020, the Surety, One Beacon, from whom the Company procured the appeal bond to secure the judgment against the Company in the matter of Janice P. Handlers-Bryman and Michael D. Bryman v. El Pollo Loco, Inc., issued a collateral demand to the Company. On April 17, 2020, the Company provided to One Beacon a Letter of Credit in the amount of $2,651,342 to satisfy the Surety’s collateral demand. On July 13, 2020, One Beacon agreed to release its collateral demand and returned the Letter of Credit to the Company. ~~Subsequent to June 24,~~

During fiscal 2020, the Company reached an agreement ~~in principle~~ with the Plaintiffs to resolve the lawsuit for a payment by the Company of $2.5 million, which was recorded within operating expenses in the Company’s ~~condensed consolidated~~ statement of ~~income~~operations for the ~~thirteen and twenty-six weeks~~fiscal year ended ~~June 24,~~December 30, 2020. Additionally, during fiscal 2020, ~~contingent upon approval~~the matter was formally resolved. On September 2, 2020, the California Court of Appeals entered an order, following a motion for stipulated reversal of the trial court’s judgment jointly filed by the parties, reversing the trial court’s judgment in the case and instructing the trial court to dismiss the matter with prejudice. On September 10, 2020, the trial court entered an order reversing its judgment and dismissing the case with prejudice. The settlement payment of $2.5 million has been made in the third quarter of 2020 and the appeal bond has been released.

On or about November 9, 2020, a former employee filed a representative action for violation of the ~~terms~~Private Attorneys General Act of 2004 (“PAGA”) pursuant to Labor Code sections 2698 et seq. in the Superior Court of the ~~parties’ proposed settlement.~~State of California, County of Los Angeles, under the caption Kenneth E. Reising, et al v. El Pollo Loco, Inc., et al (Case No. 20STCV42951) on behalf of all non-exempt employees from June 19, 2020 to the present, alleging certain violations of California labor laws. The claims include failure to pay overtime compensation, failure to provide meal periods and rest breaks, failure to reimburse employees for business expenses, failure to provide suitable seating, and failure to provide accurate itemized wage statements. The requested remedies include statutory penalties and reasonable attorneys’ fees

Table of Contents

and costs. NaN specific amount of damages sought was specified in the complaint. The Company filed an Answer to the complaint on or about January 5, 2021. Based on the assessment by management of the numerous legal arguments that can be raised on this claim, the Company believes that a loss is currently not probable or estimable under ASC 450, “Contingencies”, and as of March 31, 2021 0 accrual has been made with regard to the verdict.

On or about February 4, 2021, a former employee filed a class action in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Riverside, under the caption Brandie Crispin, et al v. El Pollo Loco, Inc. et al (Case No. CVRI2100490) on behalf of all putative class members (all non-exempt General Managers from February 4, 2017 to the present) alleging certain violations of California labor laws. The claims include failure to pay overtime compensation, failure to provide meal periods and rest breaks, and failure to provide accurate itemized wage statements. The putative lead plaintiff’s requested remedies include compensatory damages, statutory penalties, injunctive relief, and reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs. NaN specific amount of damages sought was specified in the complaint. Plaintiff filed a first amended complaint on April 12, 2021, which dismissed the class action claims and added a representative action for violation of the Private Attorneys General Act of 2004 (“PAGA”) pursuant to Labor Code sections 2698. The Company will file a responsive pleading to the first amended complaint on or before May 12, 2021. Based on the assessment by management of the numerous legal arguments that can be raised on this claim, the Company believes that a loss is currently not probable or estimable under ASC 450, “Contingencies”, and as of March 31, 2021 0 accrual has been made with regard to the verdict.

The Company is also involved in various other claims and legal actions that arise in the ordinary course of business. The Company does not believe that the ultimate resolution of these other actions will have a material adverse effect on its financial position, results of operations, liquidity, or capital resources. A significant increase in the number of claims, or an increase in amounts owing under successful claims, could materially and adversely affect its business, consolidated financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.

~~Table of Contents~~

Purchasing Commitments

The Company has long-term beverage supply agreements with certain major beverage vendors. Pursuant to the terms of these arrangements, marketing rebates are provided to the Company and its franchisees from the beverage vendors based upon the dollar volume of purchases for system-wide restaurants which will vary according to their demand for beverage syrup and fluctuations in the market rates for beverage syrup. These contracts have terms extending through the end of 2024.

At ~~June 24, 2020,~~March 31, 2021, the Company’s total estimated commitment to purchase chicken was ~~$11.1~~$25.7 million.

Contingent Lease Obligations

As a result of assigning the Company’s interest in obligations under real estate leases in connection with the sale of company-operated restaurants to some of the Company’s franchisees, the Company is contingently liable on 4four lease agreements. These leases have various terms, the latest of which expires in 2036. As of ~~June 24, 2020,~~March 31, 2021, the potential amount of undiscounted payments the Company could be required to make in the event of non-payment by the primary lessee was ~~$2.8~~$2.9 million. The present value of these potential payments discounted at the Company’s estimated pre-tax cost of debt at ~~June 24, 2020~~March 31, 2021 was ~~$2.6~~$2.7 million. The Company’s franchisees are primarily liable on the leases. The Company has cross-default provisions with these franchisees that would put them in default of their franchise agreements in the event of non-payment under the leases. The Company believes that these cross-default provisions reduce the risk that payments will be required to be made under these leases. Due to the current uncertainty related to the COVID-19 pandemic and the impact it has had on the ability of the Company’s franchisees to make their lease payments, the Company has recorded a $0.1 million liability in the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements related to these contingent liabilities.

Employment Agreements

The Company has employment agreements with 3 of the officers of the Company. These agreements provide for minimum salary levels, possible annual adjustments for cost-of-living changes, and incentive bonuses that are payable under certain business conditions.

Table of Contents

Indemnification Agreements

The Company has entered into indemnification agreements with each of its current directors and officers. These agreements require the Company to indemnify these individuals to the fullest extent permitted under Delaware law against liabilities that may arise by reason of their service to the Company and to advance expenses incurred as a result of any proceeding against them as to which they could be indemnified. The Company also intends to enter into indemnification agreements with future directors and officers.

~~8. NET INCOME PER SHARE~~

Basic earnings per share (“EPS”) is calculated using the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 24, 2020 and June 26, 2019. Diluted EPS is calculated using the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding and potentially dilutive during the period, using the treasury stock method.

On August 2, 2018, the Company announced that the Board of Directors had authorized a stock repurchase program. The Company entered into a stock repurchase plan on August 28, 2018 (the “2018 Stock Repurchase Plan”), which allowed for the repurchase of up to $20.0 million of the Company’s common stock. The 2018 Stock Repurchase Plan commenced on November 6, 2018 and terminated on June 26, 2019.

On April 30, 2019, as part of the Company’s focus on stockholder returns, the Board of Directors approved a new stock repurchase program. The Company entered into a stock repurchase plan May 17, 2019 (the “2019 Stock Repurchase Plan”), which allowed for the repurchase up to $30.0 million of the Company’s common stock. The 2019 Stock Repurchase Plan commenced on June 27, 2019, and was exhausted on September 26, 2019.

~~Table of Contents~~

~~Under~~8. EARNINGS PER SHARE

Basic earnings per share (“EPS”) is calculated using the 2019 Stock Repurchase Plan, the Company was permitted to repurchase its common stock from time to time, in amounts and at prices that the Company deemed appropriate, subject to market conditions and other considerations. The Company’s repurchases were executed using open market purchases, including pursuant to Rule 10b5-1 trading plans, and/or through privately negotiated transactions.

~~For the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 26, 2019, the Company repurchased1,303,282 and 1,558,836~~weighted-average number of shares of common stock ~~respectively under~~outstanding during the ~~2018 Stock Repurchase Plan,~~thirteen weeks ended March 31, 2021 and March 25, 2020. Diluted EPS is calculated using ~~open market purchases, for total consideration~~the weighted-average number of ~~approximately $14.9 million and $18.3 million, respectively. The~~shares of common stock ~~repurchased under both~~outstanding and potentially dilutive during the ~~2018 Stock Repurchase Plan and~~period, using the ~~2019 Stock Repurchase Plan was retired upon repurchase.~~treasury stock method.

Below are basic and diluted EPS data for the periods indicated ~~which are in~~(in thousands except for share and per share ~~data:~~data):



	Thirteen Weeks Ended				Twenty-Six Weeks Ended				Thirteen Weeks Ended
	June 24, 2020		June 26, 2019		June 24, 2020		June 26, 2019		March 31, 2021		March 25, 2020
Numerator:
Net income	$	5,499	$	14,087	$	9,099	$	15,000	$	3,964	$	3,600
Denominator:
Weighted-average shares outstanding—basic		34,836,410		37,939,912		34,747,785		38,296,807		35,795,205		34,659,160
Weighted-average shares outstanding—diluted		35,410,198		38,580,722		35,382,607		39,043,477		36,424,068		35,347,456
Net income per share—basic	$	0.16	$	0.37	$	0.26	$	0.39	$	0.11	$	0.10
Net income per share—diluted	$	0.16	$	0.37	$	0.26	$	0.38	$	0.11	$	0.10
Anti-dilutive securities not considered in diluted EPS calculation		545,881		733,449		565,118		438,547		—		474,373

Below is a reconciliation of basic and diluted share counts:



	Thirteen Weeks Ended		Twenty-Six Weeks Ended		Thirteen Weeks Ended
	June 24, 2020	June 26, 2019	June 24, 2020	June 26, 2019	March 31, 2021	March 25, 2020
Weighted-average shares outstanding—basic	34,836,410	37,939,912	34,747,785	38,296,807	35,795,205	34,659,160
Dilutive effect of stock options and restricted shares	573,788	640,810	634,822	746,670	628,863	688,296
Weighted-average shares outstanding—diluted	35,410,198	38,580,722	35,382,607	39,043,477	36,424,068	35,347,456

9. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Trimaran Pollo Partners, L.L.C. (“LLC”) owns approximately ~~46.7%~~45.9% of the Company’s outstanding common stock. This large position means that LLC and its majority owners—predecessors and affiliates of, and certain funds managed by, Trimaran Capital Partners and Freeman Spogli & Co. (collectively, “Trimaran” and “Freeman Spogli,” respectively)—possess significant influence when stockholders vote on matters such as election of directors, mergers, consolidations and acquisitions, the sale of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets, decisions affecting the Company’s capital structure, amendments to the Company’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation or amended and restated by-laws, and the Company’s winding up and dissolution. The Company’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that (i) so long as LLC beneficially owns, directly or indirectly, more than 40% of the Company’s common stock, any member of the Board of Directors or the entire Board of Directors may be removed from office at any time with or without cause by the affirmative vote of a majority of the Company’s common stock, and (ii) prior to the date the LLC ceases to beneficially own, directly or indirectly, 40% or more of the Company’s common stock, stockholders representing at least 40% of the Company’s common stock may call a special meeting of the Company’s stockholders.

Table of Contents

10. REVENUE FROM CONTRACTS WITH CUSTOMERS

Revenue Recognition

Nature of products and services

The Company has 2 revenue streams, company-operated restaurant revenue and franchise related revenue.

~~Table of Contents~~

Company-operated restaurant revenue

Revenues from the operation of company-operated restaurants are recognized as food and beverage products are delivered to customers and payment is tendered at the time of sale. The Company presents sales, net of sales-related taxes and promotional allowances.

The Company offers a loyalty rewards program, which awards a customer points for dollars spent. ~~When 100~~Customers earn points ~~are accumulated~~for each dollar spent and as of August 4, 2020, 50 points can be redeemed for a ~~$10~~$5 reward to be used onfor a future ~~purchases is earned.~~purchase. Prior to August 4, 2020, 100 points could be redeemed for a $10 reward. If a customer does not earn or use points within a one-year period, their account is deactivated and all points expire. Additionally, if a ~~$10~~ reward is not used within six months, it expires. When a customer is part of the rewards program, the obligation to provide future discounts related to points earned is considered a separate performance obligation, to which a portion of the transaction price is allocated. The performance obligation related to loyalty points is deemed to have been satisfied, and the amount deferred in the balance sheet is recognized as revenue, when the points are transferred to a ~~$10~~ reward and redeemed, the reward or points have expired, or the likelihood of redemption is remote. A portion of the transaction price is allocated to loyalty points, if necessary, on a pro-rata basis, based on stand-alone selling price, as determined by menu pricing and loyalty ~~point’s~~points terms. As of ~~both June 24, 2020~~March 31, 2021 and December ~~25, 2019,~~30, 2020, the revenue allocated to loyalty points that have not been redeemed was ~~$1.1~~$0.7 million and $0.9 million, respectively, which is reflected in the Company’s accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets within other accrued expenses and current liabilities. The Company expects the loyalty points to be redeemed and recognized over a one-year period.

The Company sells gift cards to its customers in the restaurants and through selected third parties. The gift cards sold to customers have no stated expiration dates and are subject to actual and/or potential escheatment rights in several of the jurisdictions in which the Company operates. Furthermore, due to these escheatment rights, the Company does not recognize breakage related to the sale of gift cards due to the immateriality of the amount remaining after escheatment. The Company recognizes income from gift cards when redeemed by the customer. Unredeemed gift card balances are deferred and recorded as other accrued expenses on the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets.

Franchise and franchise advertising revenue

Franchise revenue consists of franchise royalties, initial franchise fees, license fees due from franchisees, IT support services, and rental income for subleases to franchisees. Franchise advertising revenue consists of advertising contributions received from franchisees. These revenue streams are made up of the following performance obligations:

●

Franchise license - inclusive of advertising services, development agreements, training, access to plans and help desk services.

●

Discounted renewal option.

●

Hardware services.

The Company satisfies the performance obligation related to the franchise license over the term of the franchise agreement, which is typically 20 years. Payment for the franchise license consists of three components, a fixed-fee related to the franchise/development agreement, a sales-based royalty fee and a sales-based advertising fee. The fixed fee, as determined by the signed development and/or franchise agreement, is due at the time the development agreement is entered into, and/or when the franchise agreement is signed, and does not include a finance component.

The sales-based royalty fee and sales-based advertising fee are considered variable consideration and will continue to be recognized as revenue as such sales are earned by the franchisees. Both sales-based fees qualify under the royalty constraint exception, and do not require an estimate of future transaction price. Additionally, the Company is utilizing the practical expedient available under ASC Topic 606, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers” (“Topic 606”)

Table of Contents

regarding disclosure of the aggregate amount of the transaction price allocated to the performance obligations that are unsatisfied for sales-based royalties.

In certain franchise agreements, the Company offers a discounted renewal to incentivize future renewals after the end of the initial franchise term. As this is considered a separate performance obligation, the Company allocates a portion of the initial franchise fee to this discounted renewal, on a pro-rata basis, assuming a 20-year renewal. This performance obligation is satisfied over the renewal term, typically 10 or 20 years, while payment is fixed and due at the time the renewal is signed.

~~Table of Contents~~

The Company purchases hardware, such as scanners, printers, cash registers and tablets, from third party vendors, which it then sells to franchisees. As the Company is considered the principal in this relationship, payment for the hardware is considered revenue, and is received upon transfer of the goods from the Company to the franchisee. As of ~~June 24, 2020,~~March 31, 2021, there were 0 performance obligations related to hardware services that were unsatisfied or partially satisfied.

Disaggregated revenue

The following table presents our revenues disaggregated by revenue source and market (in thousands):


	Thirteen Weeks Ended				Twenty-Six Weeks Ended				Thirteen Weeks Ended
	June 24,		June 26,		June 24,		June 26,			March 31,		March 25,
	2020		2019		2020		2019			2021		2020
Core Market⁽¹⁾:
Company-operated restaurant revenue	$	81,370	$	88,808	$	167,285	$	174,114	$	87,224	$	85,915
Franchise revenue		3,208		4,174		6,716		7,673		3,687		3,508
Franchise advertising fee revenue		2,384		2,806		5,025		5,523		2,776		2,642
Total core market	$	86,962	$	95,788	$	179,026	$	187,310	$	93,687	$	92,065
Non-Core Market⁽²⁾:
Company-operated restaurant revenue	$	6,337	$	11,331	$	13,056	$	23,175	$	6,937	$	6,719
Franchise revenue		3,511		3,744		7,065		6,689		3,925		3,554
Franchise advertising fee revenue		2,794		2,877		5,620		5,543		3,172		2,825
Total non-core market	$	12,642	$	17,952	$	25,741	$	35,407	$	14,034	$	13,098
Total revenue	$	99,604	$	113,740	$	204,767	$	222,717	$	107,721	$	105,163

(1)	Core Market includes markets with existing company-operated restaurants at the time of the Company’s ~~Initial Public Offering ("IPO")~~ on July 28, 2014.

(2)	Non-Core Market includes markets entered into by the Company subsequent to the IPO date.

The following table presents our revenues disaggregated by geographic market:


	Thirteen Weeks Ended				Twenty-Six Weeks Ended
	June 24, 2020		June 26, 2019		June 24, 2020		June 26, 2019		March 31, 2021		March 25, 2020
Greater Los Angeles area market	71.1	%	69.3	%	71.7	%	69.3	%	70.1	%	72.4	%
Other markets	28.9	%	30.7	%	28.3	%	30.7	%	29.9	%	27.6	%
Total	100	%	100	%	100	%	100	%	100	%	100	%

Table of Contents

Contract balances

The following table provides information about the change in the franchise contract liability balances during the ~~twenty-six~~thirteen weeks ended ~~June 24,~~March 31, 2021 and March 25, 2020 ~~and June 26, 2019~~ (in thousands):


December 30, 2020			$	5,628
Revenue recognized - beginning balance				(163)
Additional contract liability				177
March 31, 2021			$	5,642

December 25, 2019	$	6,317	$	6,317
Revenue recognized - beginning balance		(544)		(318)
June 24, 2020	$	5,773

December 26, 2018	$	5,593
Revenue recognized - beginning balance		(203)
Additional contract liability		1,257
Revenue recognized - additional contract liability		(88)
June 26, 2019	$	6,559
March 25, 2020			$	5,999

The Company’s franchise contract liability includes development fees, initial franchise and license fees, franchise renewal fees, lease subsidies and royalty discounts and is included within other accrued expenses and current liabilities and other noncurrent liabilities within the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. The Company receives area development fees from franchisees when they execute multi-unit area development agreements. Initial franchise and license fees, or franchise renewal fees, are received from franchisees upon the execution of, or renewal of, a franchise

~~Table of Contents~~

agreement. Revenue is recognized from these agreements as the underlying performance obligation is satisfied, which is over the term of the agreement.

The following table illustrates the estimated revenue to be recognized in future periods related to performance obligations under the applicable contracts that are unsatisfied as of ~~June 24, 2020~~March 31, 2021 (in thousands):

Franchise revenues:

2020

$
323
2021

491
2022

410
2023

395
2024

381
Thereafter

3,773
Total

$
5,773


Franchise revenues:
2021	$	355
2022		439
2023		422
2024		406
2025		398
Thereafter		3,622
Total	$	5,642

Changes in the loyalty rewards program liability included in deferred revenue within other accrued expenses and current liabilities on the condensed consolidated balance sheets were as follows (in thousands):


	March 31,		December 30,
	2021		2020
Loyalty rewards liability, beginning balance	$	900	$	1,084
Revenue deferred		625		2,463
Revenue recognized		(865)		(2,647)
Loyalty rewards liability, ending balance	$	660	$	900

The Company expects all loyalty points revenue related to performance obligations unsatisfied as of March 31, 2021 to be recognized within one year.

Table of Contents

Gift Cards

The gift card liability included in other accrued expenses and current liabilities on the condensed consolidated balance sheets was as follows (in thousands):


	March 31,		December 30,
	2021		2020
Gift card liability	$	3,386	$	4,008

Revenue recognized from the redemption of gift cards that was included in other accrued expenses and current liabilities at the beginning of the year was as follows (in thousands):


	March 31,		March 25,
	2021		2020
Revenue recognized from gift card liability balance at the beginning of the year	$	1,819	$	1,245

Contract Costs

The Company does not currently incur costs to obtain or fulfill a contract that would be considered contract assets under Topic 606.

11. LEASES

~~Adoption of Topic 842 "Leases"~~

On December 27, 2018, the Company adopted Topic 842, using the effective date method, recognizing and measuring all leases that existed as of December 27, 2018. The Company recorded a cumulative-effect adjustment as of December 27, 2018. All leases that either (1) commenced, or (2) were modified or re-measured after December 27, 2018 are accounted for under Topic 842.

As a result of Topic 842, the Company recognized a ROU asset of $205.2 million and a lease liability of $222.3 million on its consolidated balance sheet as of December 27, 2018. However, the adoption of Topic 842 did not result in a material impact on the Company’s consolidated statement of operations or consolidated statement of cash flows.

Nature of leases

The Company’s operations utilize property, facilities, equipment and vehicles leased from others. Additionally, the Company has various contracts with vendors that have been determined to contain an embedded lease in accordance with Topic 842.

As of ~~June 24, 2020,~~March 31, 2021, the Company had ~~0 leases~~1 lease that it had entered into, but had not yet commenced. The Company does not have control of the property until lease commencement.

Building and facility leases

The majority of the Company’s building and facilities leases are classified as operating leases; however, the Company currently has 12 facility ~~lease~~and 6 equipment leases that isare classified as a finance ~~lease.~~leases.

Restaurants are operated under lease arrangements that generally provide for a fixed base rent and, in some instances, contingent rent based on a percentage of gross operating profit or net revenues in excess of a defined amount. Additionally, a number of the Company’s leases have payments, which increase at pre-determined dates based on the change in the consumer price index. For all leases, the Company also reimburses the landlord for non-lease components, or items that are not considered components of a contract, such as ~~common area maintenance,~~CAM, property tax and insurance costs. While the Company determined not to separate lease and non-lease components, these payments are based on actual costs, making them variable consideration and excluding them from the calculations of the ROU asset and lease liability.

~~Table of Contents~~

The initial terms of land and restaurant building leases are generally 20 years, exclusive of options to renew. These leases typically have four 5-year renewal options, which have generally been excluded in the calculation of the ROU asset and lease liability, as they are not considered reasonably certain to be exercised, unless (1) the renewal had already occurred as of the time of adoption of Topic 842, or (2) there have been significant leasehold improvements that have a useful life that extend past the original lease term. Furthermore, there are no residual value guarantees and no restrictions imposed by the lease.

During the thirteen ~~and twenty-six~~ weeks ended ~~June 24, 2020,~~March 31, 2021, the Company reassessed the lease terms on ~~4 and~~ 7 restaurants ~~respectively,~~ due to certain triggering events, such as the addition of significant leasehold improvements, the decision to terminate a lease, or the decision to renew. As a result of the reassessment, an additional ~~$1.4 million and $1.7~~$4.7 million of ROU asset and lease liabilities for

Table of Contents

the thirteen ~~and twenty-six~~ weeks ended ~~June 24, 2020, respectively,~~March 31, 2021, were recognized and will be amortized over the new lease term. During the thirteen ~~and twenty-six~~ weeks ended ~~June 26, 2019,~~March 25, 2020, the Company reassessed the lease terms on 3 restaurants due to the addition of significant leasehold improvements with useful lives that extend past the current lease ~~expiration.~~expiration, the decision to terminate a lease or the decision to renew leases. This resulted in an additional ~~$1.2~~$0.3 million of ROU asset and lease liability for the thirteen weeks ended March 31, 2020, which will be recognized over the new lease term. The reassessments did not have any impact on the original lease classification. Additionally, as the Company adopted all practical expedients available under Topic 842, no reallocation between lease and non-lease components was necessary.

The Company also subleases facilities to certain franchisees and other non-related parties which are also considered operating leases. Sublease income also includes contingent rental income based on net revenues. The vast majority of these leases have rights to extend terms via fixed rental increases. However, none of these leases have early termination rights, the right to purchase the premises or any residual value guarantees. The Company does not have any related party leases.

During the ~~twenty-six~~thirteen weeks ended ~~June 24, 2020,~~March 31, 2021, the Company determined that the carrying value of ROU assets at ~~one~~1 restaurant was not recoverable. As a result, the Company recorded a less than $0.1 million non-cash impairment charge for the thirteen weeks ended March 31, 2021, related to 1 restaurant closed in 2019. The Company recorded a $0.5 million non-cash impairment ~~expense~~charge for the ~~twenty-six~~thirteen weeks ended ~~June 24,~~March 25, 2020, primarily related to 1 restaurant in Texas, sold to franchisees in the prior year. ~~The Company did 0t recognize any impairment related to~~See Note 1, “Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies – Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and ROU ~~assets during the thirteen and twenty-six ended June 26, 2019.~~Assets” for additional information.

Equipment

Leases of equipment primarily consist of restaurant equipment, copiers and vehicles. These leases are fixed payments with no variable component. Additionally, no optional renewal periods have been included in the calculation of the ROU asset, there are no residual value guarantees and no restrictions imposed.

Significant Assumptions and Judgments

In applying the requirements of Topic 842 the Company made significant assumptions and judgments related to determination of whether a contract contains a lease and the discount rate used for the lease.

In determining if any of the Company’s contracts contain a lease the Company made assumptions and judgments related to its ability to direct the use of any assets stated in the contract and the likelihood of renewing any short-term contracts for a period extending past twelve months.

The Company also made significant assumptions and judgments in determining an appropriate discount rate for property leases. These included using a consistent discount rate for a portfolio of leases entered into at varying dates, using the full 20-year term of the lease, excluding any options, and using the total minimum lease payments. The Company utilizes a third-party valuation firm in determining the discount rate, based on the above assumptions. For all other leases, the Company uses the discount rate implicit in the lease, or the Company’s incremental borrowing rate.

As the Company has adopted the practical expedient not to separate lease and non-lease components, no significant assumptions or judgments were necessary in allocating consideration between these components, for all classes of underlying assets.

2826

Table of Contents

The following table presents the Company’s total lease cost, disaggregated by underlying asset (in thousands):

Thirteen Weeks Ended


June 24, 2020

June 26, 2019


Property

Equipment


Property

Equipment

Leases

Leases

Total

Leases

Leases

Total
Finance lease cost:







Amortization of right-of-use assets

$
—

$
—

$
—

$
3

$
—

$
3
Interest on lease liabilities

5

—

5

7

—

7
Operating lease cost

6,545

307

6,852

6,585

327

6,912
Short-term lease cost

—

5

5

—

9

9
Variable lease cost

105

45

150

127

27

154
Sublease income

(763)

—

(763)

(511)

—

(511)
Total lease cost

$
5,892

$
357

$
6,249

$
6,211

$
363

$
6,574


	Twenty-Six Weeks Ended												Thirteen Weeks Ended
	June 24, 2020						June 26, 2019						March 31, 2021						March 25, 2020
	Property		Equipment				Property		Equipment				Property		Equipment				Property		Equipment
	Leases		Leases		Total		Leases		Leases		Total		Leases		Leases		Total		Leases		Leases		Total
Finance lease cost:
Amortization of right-of-use assets	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	9	$	—	$	9	$	20	$	—	$	20	$	—	$	—	$	—
Interest on lease liabilities		11		—		11		15		—		15		15		—		15		6		—		6
Operating lease cost		13,075		614		13,689		13,187		654		13,841		6,814		301		7,115		6,530		324		6,854
Short-term lease cost		—		12		12		—		17		17		—		5		5		—		2		2
Variable lease cost		209		70		279		224		98		322		122		107		229		104		14		118
Sublease income		(1,541)		—		(1,541)		(901)		—		(901)		(796)		—		(796)		(778)		—		(778)
Total lease cost	$	11,754	$	696	$	12,450	$	12,534	$	769	$	13,303	$	6,175	$	413	$	6,588	$	5,862	$	340	$	6,202

The following table presents the Company’s total lease cost on the condensed consolidated statements of income (in thousands):


	Thirteen Weeks Ended				Twenty-Six Weeks Ended
	June 24, 2020		June 26, 2019		June 24, 2020		June 26, 2019		March 31, 2021		March 25, 2020
Lease cost – Occupancy and other operating expenses	$	5,917	$	6,256	$	11,796	$	12,659	$	6,231	$	5,879
Lease cost – General & administrative		119		114		230		233		116		111
Lease cost – Depreciation and amortization		6		3		11		9		20		—
Lease cost – Interest expense				7		—		15		15		6
Lease cost - Closed-store reserve		207		194		413		387
Lease cost – Closed-store reserve										206		206
Total lease cost	$	6,249	$	6,574	$	12,450	$	13,303	$	6,588	$	6,202

During the thirteen weeks ended March 31, 2021 and March 25, 2020, the Company had the following cash and non-cash activities associated with its leases (dollars in thousands):


	March 31, 2021								March 25, 2020
	Property			Equipment					Property			Equipment
	Leases			Leases			Total		Leases			Leases			Total
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities
Operating cash flows used for operating leases	$	5,377		$	296		$	5,673	$	6,260		$	309		$	6,569
Financing cash flows used for finance leases	$	10		$	7		$	17	$	8		$	—		$	8

Non-cash investing and financing activities:
Operating lease ROU assets obtained in exchange for lease liabilities:
Operating lease ROU assets	$	4,749		$	0		$	4,749	$	307		$	12		$	319
Finance lease ROU assets obtained in exchange for lease liabilities:
Finance lease ROU assets	$	—		$	196		$	196	$	—		$	—		$	—
Derecognition of ROU assets due to terminations, impairment or modifications	$	(63)		$	(39)		$	(102)	$	(543)		$	—		$	(543)

Other Information
Weighted-average remaining years in lease term—finance leases		18.84			4.77					2.58			—
Weighted-average remaining years in lease term—operating leases		11.38			2.09					11.94			2.97
Weighted-average discount rate—finance leases		2.51	%		1.54	%				11.10	%		—
Weighted-average discount rate—operating leases		4.35	%		3.92	%				4.35	%		3.95	%

2927

Table of Contents

~~During the twenty-six weeks ended June 24, 2020 and June 26, 2019, the Company had the following cash and non-cash activities associated with its leases (in thousands):~~

Twenty-Six Weeks Ended June 24, 2020

Twenty-Six Weeks Ended June 26, 2019


Property

Equipment


Property

Equipment

Leases

Leases

Total

Leases

Leases

Total
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities







Operating cash flows used for operating leases

$
9,269

$
619

$
9,888

$
12,361

$
654

$
13,015
Financing cash flows used for finance leases

$
16

$
—

$
16

$
53

$
—

$
53

Non-cash investing and financing activities:







Operating lease ROU assets obtained in exchange for lease liabilities:







Operating lease ROU assets

$
1,650

$
12

$
1,662

4,995

—

4,995
Derecognition of ROU assets due to terminations, impairment or modifications

$
(543)

$
(15)

$
(558)

—

—

—

Other Information







Weighted-average remaining lease term—finance leases

2.33

—



3.33

—

Weighted-average remaining lease term—operating leases

11.73

2.74



12.23

3.55

Weighted-average discount rate—finance leases

11.10
%

—



11.10
%

—

Weighted-average discount rate—operating leases

4.34
%

3.93
%



4.38
%

3.98
%

Information regarding the Company’s minimum future lease obligations as of ~~June 24, 2020~~March 31, 2021 is as follows (in thousands):

Finance

Operating Leases


Minimum

Minimum

Minimum

Lease

Lease

Sublease
For the Years Ending

Payments

Payments

Income
December 30, 2020

$
27

$
14,838

$
1,393
December 29, 2021

54

28,909

2,887
December 28, 2022

45

25,975

3,284
December 27, 2023

—

23,627

3,318
December 25, 2024

—

21,333

3,203
Thereafter

—

141,408

27,265
Total

$
126

$
256,090

$
41,350
Less: imputed interest (2.33% - 11.10%)

(26)

(49,051)


Present value of lease obligations

100

207,039


Less: current maturities

(37)

(17,979)


Noncurrent portion

$
63
��
$
189,060

~~Table of Contents~~

~~Information regarding the Company’s minimum future lease obligations as of December 25, 2019 is as follows (in thousands):~~


	Finance Leases		Operating Leases				Finance		Operating Leases
	Minimum		Minimum		Minimum		Minimum		Minimum		Minimum
	Lease		Lease		Sublease		Lease		Lease		Sublease
For the Years Ending	Payments		Payments		Income		Payments		Payments		Income
December 30, 2020	$	54	$	26,808	$	2,754
December 29, 2021		54		25,978		2,887	$	140	$	21,694	$	2,302
December 28, 2022		45		24,871		3,284		190		27,051		3,383
December 27, 2023		—		22,309		3,318		145		24,717		3,346
December 25, 2024		—		19,751		3,203		145		22,428		3,231
December 31, 2025								141		19,989		2,881
Thereafter		—		139,454		27,265		1,690		129,774		24,475
Total	$	153	$	259,171	$	42,711	$	2,451	$	245,653	$	39,618
Less: imputed interest (3.96% to 11.10%)		(36)		(45,273)
Present value of capital lease obligations		117		213,898
Less: imputed interest (1.54% - 4.35%)								(499)		(47,056)
Present value of lease obligations								1,952		198,597
Less: current maturities		(34)		(16,406)				(134)		(19,949)
Noncurrent portion	$	83		197,492			$	1,818	$	178,648

Short-Term Leases

The Company has multiple short-term leases, which have terms of less than 12 months, and thus were excluded from the recognition requirements of Topic 842. The Company has recognized these lease payments in its consolidated statements of operations on a straight-line basis over the lease term and variable lease payments in the period in which the obligation for those payments iswas incurred.

In April 2020, the FASB issued guidance allowing entities to make a policy election whether to account for lease concessions related to the COVID-19 pandemic as lease modifications. The election applies to any lessor-provided lease concession related to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, provided the concession does not result in a substantial increase in the rights of the lessor or in the obligations of the lessee. During the fiscal 2020, the Company received non-substantial concessions from certain landlords in the form of rent deferrals and abatements. The Company elected to not account for these rent concessions as lease modifications. The rent concessions are recorded as part of other accrued expenses. The recognition of rent concessions did not have a material impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements as of March 31, 2021.

Lessor

The Company is a lessor for certain property, facilities and equipment owned by the Company and leased to others, principally franchisees, under non-cancelable leases with initial terms ranging from three to 20 years. These lease agreements generally provide for a fixed base rent and, in some instances, contingent rent based on a percentage of gross operating profit or net revenues. All leases are considered operating leases.

For the leases in which the Company is the lessor, there are options to extend the lease. However, there are no terms and conditions to terminate the lease, no right to purchase premises and no residual value guarantees. Additionally, there are no related party leases.

The Company received $0.1 million ~~and $0.2 million, respectively,~~ of lease income from company-owned locations for ~~the~~both thirteen weeks ended ~~June 24, 2020~~March 31, 2021 and ~~June 26, 2019. For each of the~~ ~~twenty-six weeks ended June 24, 2020~~ ~~and~~ ~~June 26, 2019, the Company received~~ ~~$0.3 million of lease income from company-owned locations~~.March 25, 2020.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Cautionary Statement Concerning Forward-Looking Statements

This report contains forward-looking statements that are subject to risks and uncertainties. All statements other than statements of historical fact included in this report are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements discuss our current expectations and projections relating to our financial condition, results of operations, plans, objectives, future performance and business. You can identify forward-looking statements because they do not relate strictly to historical

Table of Contents

or current facts. These statements may include words such as “aim,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “forecast,” “outlook,” “potential,” “project,” “projection,” “plan,” “intend,” “seek,” “may,” “could,” “would,” “will,” “should,” “can,” “can have,” “likely,” the negatives thereof and other words and terms of similar meaning in connection with any discussion of the timing or nature of future operating or financial performance or other events. They appear in a number of places throughout this report and include statements regarding our intentions, beliefs or current expectations concerning, among other things, our results of operations, financial condition, liquidity, prospects, growth, strategies and the industry in which we operate. All forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those that we expected.

~~Table of Contents~~

While we believe that our assumptions are reasonable, we caution that it is very difficult to predict the impact of known factors, and it is impossible for us to anticipate all factors that could affect our actual results. All forward-looking statements are expressly qualified in their entirety by these cautionary statements. You should evaluate all forward-looking statements made in this report in the context of the factors that could cause outcomes to differ materially from our expectations. These factors include, but are not limited to:

●

the impacts of the ~~novel coronavirus (COVID-19)~~COVID-19 pandemic on our company, our employees, our customers, our partners, our industry and the economy as a whole, as well as our ~~franchisees~~franchisees’ ability to maintain operations in their individual restaurants;

●

the adverse impact of economic conditions on our (i) operating results and financial condition, (ii) ability to comply with the terms and covenants of our debt agreements, and (iii) ability to pay or refinance our existing debt or to obtain additional financing;

●

our ability to open new restaurants in new and existing markets, including difficulty in finding sites and in negotiating acceptable leases;

●

our ability to compete successfully with other quick-service and fast casual restaurants;

●

vulnerability to changes in consumer preferences and economic conditions;

●

vulnerability to political and social factors, including regarding trade, immigration or customer preferences;

●

vulnerability to conditions in the greater Los Angeles area;

●

vulnerability to natural disasters given the geographic concentration and real estate intensive nature of our business;

●

our ability to effectively identify and secure appropriate new sites for restaurants;

●

the possibility that we may continue to incur significant impairment of certain of our assets, in particular in our new markets;

●

changes to food and supply costs, especially for chicken;

●

social media and negative publicity, whether or not valid, and our ability to respond to and effectively manage the accelerated impact of social media;

●

our ability to continue to expand our digital business, delivery orders and catering;

●

concerns about food safety and quality and about food-borne illness, particularly avian flu;

●

dependence on frequent and timely deliveries of food and supplies and our dependence on a single supplier to distribute substantially all of our products to our restaurants;

●

our ability to service our level of indebtedness;

●

uncertainty related to the success of our marketing programs, new menu items, advertising campaigns and restaurant designs and remodels;

●

our reliance on our franchisees, who may incur financial hardships, lose access to credit, close restaurants, or declare bankruptcy, and our limited control over our franchisees and potential liability for their acts;

●

potential exposure to unexpected costs and losses from our self-insurance programs;

●

potential obligations under long-term and non-cancelable leases, and our ability to renew leases at the ~~impact~~end of ~~any security breaches of confidential customer information in connection with our electronic process of credit and debit card transactions;~~their terms;

●

the impact of any failure of our information technology system or any breach of our network security;

●

the impact of any security breaches of confidential customer data or personal information in connection with our electronic process of credit and debit card transactions;

●

our ability to enforce and maintain our trademarks and protect our ~~name and logo and~~ other proprietary intellectual property;

●

risks related to government regulation and litigation, including employment and labor laws; and

●

other risks set forth in our filings with the SEC from time to time, including under Item 1A, Risk Factors in ~~this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, under Item 1A, Risk Factors in~~ our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December ~~25, 2019 and under Item 1A, Risk Factors in our quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 25,~~30, 2020, which ~~such~~ filings are available online at www.sec.gov~~, at~~ ~~www.elpolloloco.com~~ ~~or upon request from El Pollo Loco.~~.

We caution you that the important factors referenced above may not contain all of the factors that are important to you. In addition, we cannot assure you that we will realize the results or developments we expect or anticipate or, even if substantially realized, that they will result in the consequences we anticipate or affect us or our operations in the ways

Table of Contents

that we expect. The forward-looking statements included in this report are made only as of the date hereof. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law. If we do update one or more forward-looking statements, no inference should be made that we will make additional updates with respect to those or other forward-looking statements. We qualify all of our forward-looking statements by these cautionary statements.

Overview

El Pollo Loco is a differentiated and growing restaurant concept that specializes in fire-grilling citrus-marinated chicken and operates in the ~~limited service restaurant (“LSR”)~~LSR segment. We strive to offer food that integrates the culinary traditions of Mexico with the healthier lifestyle of Los Angeles, a combination that we call ~~“LA-Mex”.~~“LA-Mex.” Our distinctive menu features our signature product--citrus-marinated fire-grilled chicken--and a variety of Mexican and LA-inspired entrees that we create from our chicken. We serve individual and family-sized chicken meals, a variety of Mexican and

~~Table of Contents~~

LA-inspired entrees, and sides, and, throughout the year, on a limited-time basis, additional proteins like shrimp. Our entrees include favorites such as our Chicken Avocado Burrito, ~~Under 500 Calorie~~Pollo Fit entrees, chicken tostada salads, and Pollo Bowls. Our famous Creamy Cilantro dressings and salsas are prepared fresh daily, allowing our customers to create their favorite flavor profiles to enhance their culinary experience. Our distinctive menu with ~~healthier~~better for you and more affordable alternatives appeals to consumers across a wide variety of socio-economic backgrounds and drives our balanced composition of sales throughout the day (our “day-part mix”), including at lunch and dinner.

COVID-19 Impact

On January 30, 2020, the World Health Organization (“WHO”) announced a global health emergency because of a new strain of coronavirus ("COVID-19") originating in Wuhan, China and the risks to the international community as the virus spreads globally beyond its point of origin. On March 11, 2020, the WHO classified the COVID-19 outbreak as a pandemic, based on the rapid increase in exposure globally.

The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly disrupted our restaurant operations. Following the pandemic declaration in March 2020, federal, state and local governments began to respond to the public health crisis by requiring social distancing, ~~"stay~~“stay at ~~home"~~home” directives, and restaurant restrictions - including government-mandated dining room closures - that limited business to off-premise services only (take-out, drive-thru and delivery). Historically, approximately 20% of ~~the Company’s~~our sales are associated with dine-in service. In May 2020, the “stay at home” directive was modified in most areas in which the Company operates, allowing for the opening of lower-risk workplaces, including restaurants, but with restrictions such as limited capacity. However, in recent months a surge in the COVID-19 pandemic has caused manyMany state and local governments continue to ~~re-implement~~periodically implement certain restrictions to try and contain the spread of the virus. ~~Except for nine restaurants in Houston and one in Utah, all~~As of March 31, 2021, the majority of our restaurants ~~are operating on~~have dining rooms open at a limited capacity and continue to maintain take-away, mobile pick-up, ~~and~~ delivery, ~~basis, as well as maintaining~~and drive-thru operations where ~~available,~~ available. During the last two months of 2020 and early 2021, the Los Angeles market was heavily impacted by an increase in ~~order to protect our employees~~ ~~and customers from the spread of the~~ COVID-19 ~~pandemic and to comply with the government mandates.~~cases. Due to our high concentration of restaurants in this market, we were disproportionately impacted by this spike. During the ~~impact~~thirteen weeks ended March 31, 2021, we temporarily closed 45 restaurants, of ~~the COVID-19 pandemic,~~which all have reopened as of March 31, 2021. Similarly, during the thirteen ~~and twenty-six~~ weeks ended ~~June 24, 2020, we~~March 31, 2021, our franchisees temporarily closed ~~31 restaurants, 30 of which have reopened and one remained closed as of June 24, 2020. Similarly, franchisees have temporarily closed 21~~15 restaurants, of which 17all have reopened ~~and four remain closed~~ as of ~~June 24, 2020.~~March 31, 2021. For both franchise-operated and company-operated restaurants, this represents total temporary closures and may include more than one closure for the same restaurant. These closures typically lasted from one to three days. As of ~~June 24, 2020,~~March 31, 2021, we ~~have~~had not permanently closed any restaurants due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

~~Below is a summary of other actions we have taken, or plan~~Subsequent to ~~take to enhance financial and operating flexibility for~~March 31, 2021, the Company has temporarily closed two restaurants, typically for one to three days, and ~~for our~~ franchisees have not temporarily closed any restaurants.

During the thirteen weeks ended March 31, 2021, we incurred 2.8 million in COVID-19 related expenses, primarily due to leaves of absence and ~~to protect our employees and customers:~~

●

~~As a precautionary measure, we bolstered our existing cash position by fully drawing down our $150 million 2018 Revolver, adding $34.5 million of cash to our balance sheet.~~overtime pay.

●

We have temporarily suspended all share repurchase activity, significantly reduced capital spending, reevaluated essential support center general and administrative expenses, and fine-tuned our restaurant labor model based on indoor dining room restrictions, limited dining room capacity in restaurants located in geographies where indoor dining is permitted, dining room closures and fluctuating sales volume.

●

For our franchisees, we deferred 50% of their April royalties until July 1, 2020, when such royalties began to be repaid in even monthly installments over the remainder of fiscal 2020. In addition, we deferred 100% of our franchisees’ 2020 remodel and new restaurant build requirements until 2021. We also established a support team to assist franchisees in accessing funds and benefits provided by the CARES Act legislation.

●

For our employees, we continue to implement actions to help protect them from the coronavirus while working in our restaurants. These include implementing enhanced cleaning procedures in our restaurants, providing gloves and masks to all system restaurant employees, installing plexiglass shields at company restaurant cashier stations and initiating other social distancing measures. We are providing extended sick leave benefits to employees impacted by COVID-19, and we have granted two weeks paid leave for employees who are 65 or older.

●

~~We have shifted our marketing to highlight our free delivery program; our Family Meals as a healthier and affordable option; and our meaningful value platform.~~

●

~~We delayed making April, May and June rent payments on the majority of our leased properties, and we have reached rent abatement and/or deferment agreements with our landlords for those properties.~~

●

~~We have taken advantage of provisions available under the CARES Act. Specifically, we have deferred payment of employer Social Security taxes that are otherwise owed for wage payments.~~

~~Table of Contents~~

The full impact of the COVID-19 outbreak continues to evolve as of the date of this report. Management is continually evaluating the impact of the global crisis on its financial condition, liquidity, operations, suppliers, industry, and workforce and will take additional actions as necessary. The disruption in operations has led to us considering the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our liquidity, debt covenant compliance, and recoverability of long-lived and ROU assets, goodwill and intangible assets, among others. If these disruptions to our operations from COVID-19 pandemic continue, they may have a material negative impact on our financial results, future operations and liquidity. The extent of such negative impact will depend, in part, on the COVID-19 pandemics longevity and severity.

Due to the rapid development and fluidity of this situation, we cannot determine the ultimate impact that the COVID-19 pandemic will have on our consolidated financial condition, liquidity, and future results of operations, and therefore any prediction as to the ultimate material adverse impact on tour consolidated financial condition, liquidity, and future results of operations is uncertain.

Growth Strategies and Outlook

As of ~~June 24, 2020,~~March 31, 2021, we had ~~479~~481 locations in six states. In fiscal ~~2019,~~2020, we opened ~~two new company-operated and two new franchised restaurants all in California. For the twenty-six weeks ended June 24, 2020,~~ one new company-operated restaurant ~~was opened~~ in Nevada, which was in process prior to the COVID-19 pandemic and ~~two franchised~~our franchisees opened three new restaurants, ~~one~~two in California and one in ~~Arizona,~~Arizona. For the thirteen weeks ended March 31, 2021, two new company-operated restaurants were ~~opened. As a result of the COVID-19 crisis, we have suspended company-operated~~opened, one in Nevada and one in California, and no new unit development until the timing of the economic recovery and our business improvement becomes more clear. In addition, we are allowing franchisees to defer their 2020 new unit development obligations until 2021. As a result, we do not expect to open any additional company-operated or franchised ~~restaurant during the remainder of 2020.~~restaurants were opened.

~~It is our intention to return to the following long-term growth strategy after the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic subsides.~~ We plan to continue to expand our business, drive restaurant sales growth, and enhance our competitive positioning, by executing the following strategies:

●

expand our restaurant base;

●

increase our comparable restaurant sales; and

Table of Contents

●

enhance operations and leverage our infrastructure.

To increase comparable restaurant sales, we plan to increase customer frequency, attract new customers, and improve per-person spend. Success of these growth plans is not guaranteed.

Highlights and Trends

Comparable Restaurant Sales

~~System-wide, for~~For the thirteen ~~and twenty-six~~ weeks ended ~~June 24, 2020,~~March 31, 2021, system-wide comparable restaurant sales ~~decreased~~increased by ~~9.7% and 5.7%~~7.4%, ~~respectively,~~ from the comparable period in the prior year. For company-operated restaurants, comparable restaurant sales for the thirteen ~~and twenty-six~~ weeks ended ~~June 24, 2020 decreased~~March 31, 2021 increased by ~~8.5% and 4.7%, respectively.~~3.3%. For company-operated restaurants, the quarter’s change in comparable restaurant sales consisted of an approximately 15.7% increase in average check size, partially offset by a decline in transactions of 25.4%, partially offset by an approximately 22.5% increase in average check size, and the year-to-date change in comparable restaurant sales consisted of a 15.2% decline in transactions, partially offset by a 12.4% increase in average check size.10.7%. For franchised restaurants, comparable restaurant sales ~~decreased 10.6% and 6.4%~~increased 10.5% for the thirteen ~~and twenty-six~~ weeks ended ~~June 24, 2020, respectively.~~March 31, 2021. Refer to Comparable Restaurant Sales definition in ~~"Key~~“Key Performance ~~Indicators"~~Indicators” section below.

~~Table of Contents~~

Restaurant Development

Our restaurant counts at the beginning and end of each of the last three fiscal years and the ~~twenty-six~~thirteen weeks ended ~~June 24, 2020,~~March 31, 2021, were as ~~follows.~~follows:


	Twenty-Six Weeks Ended	Fiscal Year Ended			Thirteen Weeks Ended	Fiscal Year Ended
	June 24, 2020	2019	2018	2017	March 31, 2021	2020	2019	2018
Company-operated restaurant activity:
Beginning of period	195	213	212	201	196	195	213	212
Openings	1	2	8	16	2	1	2	8
Restaurant sale to franchisee	—	(16)	—	—	—	—	(16)	—
Closures	—	(4)	(7)	(5)	—	—	(4)	(7)
Restaurants at end of period	196	195	213	212	198	196	195	213
Franchised restaurant activity:
Beginning of period	287	271	265	259	283	287	271	265
Openings	2	2	9	7	—	3	2	9
Restaurant sale to franchisee	—	16	—	—	—	—	16	—
Closures	(6)	(2)	(3)	(1)	—	(7)	(2)	(3)
Restaurants at end of period	283	287	271	265	283	283	287	271
System-wide restaurant activity:
Beginning of period	482	484	477	460	479	482	484	477
Openings	3	4	17	23	2	4	4	17
Closures	(6)	(6)	(10)	(6)	—	(7)	(6)	(10)
Restaurants at end of period	479	482	484	477	481	479	482	484

Restaurant Remodeling

~~As of June 24,~~In 2020, ~~together with our franchisees,~~ we had remodeled 34 company-operated and 45 franchised restaurants using our newest Vision restaurant design. The Vision design elevates the brand image with exterior and interior features that embrace the brand’s authentic roots with warm textures, rustic elements and a focus on the signature open kitchen layout established in previous designs. As of June 24, 2020, including new builds and remodels, we had 120 restaurants open with the Vision design in our system. Remodeling is a use of cash and has implications for our net property and equipment owned and depreciation and amortization line items on our condensed consolidated balance sheets and consolidated statements of income, among others. The cost of our restaurant remodels varies depending on the scope of work required, but on average, the investment is $0.3 million to $0.4 million per restaurant. We believe that our remodeling program will result in higher restaurant revenue and a strengthened brand. In addition, we are currently working onfinalized a new ~~asset~~restaurant design that we believe will clearly differentiate and communicate our brand, both on the exterior and interior. We believe that ~~this new design will deliver good new unit volumes and cash on cash returns in both existing and new markets. We also believe that~~ our remodels using this new design will result in higher restaurant revenue and a strengthened brand. ~~If tests are successful, this new design will replace our “Vision” design, which was implemented in 2016. However, given the uncertainty surrounding the~~ ~~severity and longevity~~As of ~~the COVID-19 pandemic, as a precautionary measure~~March 31, 2021 we have ~~significantly reduced capital spending in 2020 and plan to limit our~~completed five remodels ~~to two restaurants~~ using the new ~~design in the fourth quarter. We do not expect our franchisees~~asset design. In fiscal 2021, we plan to complete ~~any~~a total of 15 company and 40 franchise remodels ~~in 2020 as we have deferred their remodel requirements until 2021.~~using the new design.

Loco Rewards

During the second quarter of 2017, we introduced a new loyalty rewards points program in an effort to increase sales and loyalty among our customers, by offering rewards that incentivize customers to visit our restaurants more often each month. Customers earn points for each ~~dollars~~dollar spent and ~~100~~as of August 4, 2020, 50 points can be redeemed for a ~~$10~~$5 reward to be used for a future purchase. Prior to August 4, 2020, 100 points could be redeemed for a $10 reward. If a customer does not earn or use points within a one-year period, their account is deactivated and all points expire. Additionally, if a ~~$10~~ reward is not used within six months, it expires. When a customer is part of the rewards program, the obligation to provide future discounts related to points earned is considered a separate performance obligation, to which

Table of Contents

a portion of the transaction price is allocated. The performance obligation related to loyalty points is deemed to have been satisfied, and the amount deferred in the balance sheet is recognized as revenue, when the points are transferred to a ~~$10~~ reward and redeemed, the reward or points have expired, or the likelihood of redemption is

~~Table of Contents~~

remote. A portion of the transaction price is allocated to loyalty points, if necessary, on a pro-rata basis, based on stand-alone selling price, as determined by menu pricing and loyalty point’s terms.

In addition, customers can earn additional points and free entrées for a variety of engagement activities. As points are available for redemption past the quarter earned, a portion of the revenue associated with the earned points will be deferred until redemption or expiration. As of both ~~June 24, 2020,~~March 31, 2021 and December ~~25, 2019,~~30, 2020, the revenue allocated to loyalty points that have not been redeemed ~~are $1.1~~is $0.7 million and $0.9 million, respectively, which is reflected in the Company’s accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets within other accrued expenses and current liabilities. The Company had over ~~1.8~~2.2 million loyalty program members as of ~~June 24, 2020.~~March 31, 2021.

Critical Accounting Policies and Use of Estimates

The preparation of our condensed consolidated financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect our reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue, and expenses, and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under current circumstances in making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily available from other sources. We evaluate our estimates on an on-going basis. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

Accounting policies are an integral part of our condensed consolidated financial statements. A thorough understanding of these accounting policies is essential when reviewing our reported results of operations and our financial position. Management believes that the critical accounting policies and estimates discussed below involve the most difficult management judgments, due to the sensitivity of the methods and assumptions used. For a summary of our critical accounting policies and a discussion of our use of estimates, see “Critical Accounting Policies and Use of Estimates” in Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December ~~25, 2019.~~30, 2020.

There have been no material changes to our critical accounting policies or uses of estimates since our annual report on Form 10-K.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Recent accounting pronouncements are described in Note 1, “Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” in the Notes to ~~our condensed consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report.~~Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements above.

Key Financial Definitions

Revenue

Our revenue is derived from three primary sources: company-operated restaurant revenue, franchise revenue, which is comprised primarily of franchise royalties and, to a lesser extent, franchise fees and sublease rental income, and franchise advertising fee revenue. See Note 10, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers” in the Notes to ~~Item I~~Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements above for further details regarding our revenue recognition policy.

Food and Paper Costs

Food and paper costs include the direct costs associated with food, beverage and packaging of our menu items. The components of food and paper costs are variable in nature, change with sales volume, are impacted by menu mix, and are subject to increases or decreases in commodity costs.

Labor and Related Expenses

Labor and related expenses include wages, payroll taxes, workers’ compensation expense, benefits, and bonuses paid to our restaurant management teams. Like other expense items, we expect labor costs to grow proportionately as our

Table of Contents

restaurant revenue grows. Factors that influence labor costs include minimum wage and payroll tax legislation, the frequency and severity of workers’ compensation claims, health care costs, and the performance of our restaurants.

~~Table of Contents~~

Occupancy Costs and Other Operating Expenses

Occupancy costs include rent, ~~common area maintenance,~~CAM, and real estate taxes. Other restaurant operating expenses include the costs of utilities, advertising, credit card processing fees, restaurant supplies, repairs and maintenance, and other restaurant operating costs.

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses are comprised of expenses associated with corporate and administrative functions that support the development and operations of our restaurants, including compensation and benefits, travel expenses, stock compensation costs, legal and professional fees, and other related corporate costs. Also included are pre-opening costs, and expenses above the restaurant level, including salaries for field management, such as area and regional managers, and franchise field operational support.

Legal Settlements

Legal settlements include expenses such as judgments or settlements related to legal matters, legal claims and class action lawsuits.

Franchise Expenses

Franchise expenses are primarily comprised of rent expenses incurred on properties leased by us and then sublet to franchisees, expenses incurred in support of franchisee information technology systems, and the franchisee’s portion of advertising expenses.

Depreciation and Amortization

Depreciation and amortization primarily consists of the depreciation of property and equipment, including leasehold improvements and equipment.

Loss on Disposal of Assets

Loss on disposal of assets includes the loss on disposal of assets related to retirements and replacement or write-off of leasehold improvements or equipment.

Impairment and Closed-Store Reserves

We review long-lived assets such as property, equipment, and intangibles on a unit-by-unit basis for impairment when events or circumstances indicate a carrying value of the assets that may not be recoverable. We determine if there is impairment at the restaurant level by comparing undiscounted future cash flows from the related long-lived assets to their respective carrying values and record an impairment charge when appropriate. In determining future cash flows, significant estimates are made by us with respect to future operating results of each restaurant over its remaining lease term, including sales trends, labor rates, commodity costs and other operating cost assumptions. If assets are determined to be impaired, the impairment charge is measured by calculating the amount by which the asset carrying amount exceeds its fair value. This process of assessing fair values requires the use of estimates and assumptions, including our ability to sell or reuse the related assets and market conditions, which are subject to a high degree of judgment. If these assumptions change in the future, we may be required to record impairment charges for these assets and these charges could be material.

When the Company closes a restaurant, it will evaluate the ~~ROU~~right-of-use (“ROU”) asset for impairment, based on anticipated sublease recoveries. The remaining value of the ROU asset is amortized on a straight-line basis, with the expense recognized in closed-store reserve expense, in addition to property tax and ~~common area maintenance ("CAM")~~CAM charges for closed restaurants.

3733

Table of Contents

Interest Expense, Net

Interest expense, net, consists primarily of interest on our outstanding debt. Debt issuance costs are amortized at cost over the life of the related debt.

Provision for Income Taxes

Provision for income taxes consists of federal and state taxes on our income.

Comparison of Results of ~~Income~~Operations

Our operating results for the thirteen weeks ended ~~June 24,~~March 31, 2021 and March 25, 2020 ~~and June 26, 2019~~ and expressed as percentages of total revenue, with the exception of cost of operations and company restaurant expenses, which are expressed as a percentage of company-operated restaurant revenue, are compared below.


	Thirteen Weeks Ended									Thirteen Weeks Ended
	June 24, 2020			June 26, 2019			Increase / (Decrease)			March 31, 2021			March 25, 2020			Increase / (Decrease)
	($,000)		(%)	($,000)		(%)	($,000)		(%)	($,000)		(%)	($,000)		(%)	($,000)		(%)
Statements of Income Data
Company-operated restaurant revenue	$	87,707	88.1	$	100,139	88.0	$	(12,432)	(12.4)	$	94,161	87.4	$	92,634	88.1	$	1,527	1.6
Franchise revenue		6,719	6.7		7,918	7.0		(1,199)	(15.1)		7,612	7.1		7,062	6.7		550	7.8
Franchise advertising fee revenue		5,178	5.2		5,683	5.0		(505)	(8.9)		5,948	5.5		5,467	5.2		481	8.8
Total revenue		99,604	100.0		113,740	100.0		(14,136)	(12.4)		107,721	100.0		105,163	100.0		2,558	2.4
Cost of operations
Food and paper costs(1)		22,873	26.1		27,886	27.8		(5,013)	(18.0)
Labor and related expenses(1)		25,759	29.4		29,272	29.2		(3,513)	(12.0)
Occupancy and other operating expenses(1)		21,922	25.0		23,032	23.0		(1,110)	(4.8)
Company restaurant expenses(1)		70,554	80.4		80,190	80.1		(9,636)	(12.0)
Food and paper costs (1)											24,391	25.9		25,562	27.6		(1,171)	(4.6)
Labor and related expenses (1)											30,732	32.6		28,693	31.0		2,039	7.1
Occupancy and other operating expenses (1)											23,844	25.3		22,109	23.9		1,735	7.8
Company restaurant expenses (1)											78,967	83.9		76,364	82.5		2,603	3.4
General and administrative expenses		10,465	10.5		9,348	8.2		1,117	11.9		10,474	9.7		9,331	8.9		1,143	12.2
Franchise expenses		6,627	6.7		7,542	6.6		(915)	(12.1)		7,751	7.2		6,911	6.6		840	12.2
Depreciation and amortization		4,168	4.2		4,454	3.9		(286)	(6.4)		3,938	3.7		4,369	4.2		(431)	(9.9)
Loss on disposal of assets		27	0.0		134	0.1		(107)	(79.9)		26	0.0		100	0.1		(74)	(74.0)
Recovery of securities lawsuits related legal expenses and other insurance claims		(123)	(0.1)		(10,000)	(8.8)		9,877	(98.8)
Impairment and closed-store reserves		437	0.4		565	0.5		(128)	(22.7)		564	0.5		2,402	2.3		(1,838)	(76.5)
Loss on assets held for sale		—	—		927	0.8		(927)	(100.0)
Total expenses		92,155	92.5		93,160	81.9		(1,005)	(1.1)		101,720	94.4		99,477	94.6		2,243	2.3
Income from operations		7,449	7.5		20,580	18.1		(13,131)	(63.8)		6,001	5.6		5,686	5.4		315	5.5
Interest expense, net of interest income		908	0.9		922	0.8		(14)	(1.5)		517	0.5		905	0.9		(388)	(42.9)
Income tax receivable agreement expense (income)		290	0.3		(94)	(0.1)		384	(408.5)
Income tax receivable agreement income											(77)	(0.1)		(120)	(0.1)		43	(35.8)
Income before provision for income taxes		6,251	6.3		19,752	17.4		(13,501)	(68.4)		5,561	5.2		4,901	4.7		660	13.5
Provision for income taxes		752	0.8		5,665	5.0		(4,913)	(86.7)		1,597	1.5		1,301	1.2		296	22.8
Net income	$	5,499	5.5	$	14,087	12.4	$	(8,588)	(61.0)	$	3,964	3.7	$	3,600	3.4	$	364	10.1

(1)	Percentages for line items relating to cost of operations and company restaurant expenses are calculated with company-operated restaurant revenue as the denominator. All other percentages use total revenue.

~~Table of Contents~~

Our operating results for the twenty-six weeks ended June 24, 2020 and June 26, 2019 and expressed as percentages of total revenue, with the exception of cost of operations and company restaurant expenses, which are expressed as a percentage of company-operated restaurant revenue, are compared below.

Twenty-Six Weeks Ended

June 24, 2020

June 26, 2019

Increase / (Decrease)


($,000)

(%)

($,000)

(%)

($,000)

(%)
Statements of Income Data

Company-operated restaurant revenue

$
180,341

88.1

$
197,289

88.6

$
(16,948)

(8.6)
Franchise revenue

13,781

6.7

14,362

6.4

(581)

(4.0)
Franchise advertising fee revenue

10,645

5.2

11,066

5.0

(421)

(3.8)
Total revenue

204,767

100.0

222,717

100.0

(17,950)

(8.1)
Cost of operations











Food and paper costs(1)

48,435

26.9

55,038

27.9

(6,603)

(12.0)
Labor and related expenses(1)

54,452

30.2

58,848

29.8

(4,396)

(7.5)
Occupancy and other operating expenses(1)

44,031

24.4

46,259

23.4

(2,228)

(4.8)
Company restaurant expenses(1)

146,918

81.5

160,145

81.2

(13,227)

(8.3)
General and administrative expenses

19,796

9.7

20,696

9.3

(900)

(4.3)
Franchise expenses

13,538

6.6

13,686

6.1

(148)

(1.1)
Depreciation and amortization

8,537

4.2

9,215

4.1

(678)

(7.4)
Loss on disposal of assets

127

0.1

178

0.1

(51)

(28.7)
Recovery of securities lawsuits related legal expenses and other insurance claims

(123)

(0.1)

(10,000)

(4.5)

9,877

(98.8)
Impairment and closed-store reserves

2,839

1.4

874

0.4

1,965

224.8
Loss on assets held for sale

—

—

5,051

2.3

(5,051)

(100.0)
Total expenses

191,632

93.6

199,845

89.7

(8,213)

(4.1)
Income from operations

13,135

6.4

22,872

10.3

(9,737)

(42.6)
Interest expense, net of interest income

1,813

0.9

1,781

0.8

32

1.8
Income tax receivable agreement expense

170

0.1

77

—

93

120.8
Income before provision for income taxes

11,152

5.4

21,014

9.4

(9,862)

(46.9)
Provision for income taxes

2,053

1.0

6,014

2.7

(3,961)

(65.9)
Net income

$
9,099

4.4

$
15,000

6.7

$
(5,901)

(39.3)

~~(1)~~

Percentages for line items relating to cost of operations and company restaurant expenses are calculated with company-operated restaurant revenue as the denominator. All other percentages use total revenue.

Company-Operated Restaurant Revenue

For the quarter, company-operated restaurant revenue ~~decreased $12.4~~increased $1.5 million, or ~~12.4%~~1.6%, from the comparable period in the prior year. The ~~decline~~increase in company-operated restaurant sales was primarily due to a ~~decrease in company-operated restaurant revenue of $8.1 million due to an 8.5% decrease~~3.3% increase in company-operated comparable restaurant sales ~~which we believe~~and an increase of $0.5 million of non-comparable restaurant sales. The company-operated comparable restaurant sales increase consisted of an approximately 15.7% increase in average check size, partially offset by a decline in transactions of 10.7%. It is uncertain whether the increase in average check size will persist once the pandemic ends. This company-operated restaurant sales increase was ~~primarily related~~partially offset by a $1.0 million decrease in revenue due to ~~the impact of~~temporary restaurant closures resulting from the COVID-19 ~~pandemic.~~ pandemic, and a less than $0.1 million decrease in revenue recognized for our loyalty points program. See above under “COVID-19 Impact” for additional information related to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our business. Additionally, there was a $4.2 million decrease in revenue from the closure of two restaurants and the 16 company-operated restaurants sold by the Company to franchisees during or subsequent to the second quarter of 2019 and a $0.7 million decrease due to temporary closures. This company-operated restaurant sales decrease was partially offset by an increase of $0.6 million of non-comparable restaurant sales on restaurants that had not been open the fifteen months required to be included in comparable restaurant sales. The company-operated comparable restaurant sales decrease consisted of a decline in transactions of 25.4%, partially offset by an approximately 22.5% increase in average check size.

Year-to-date, company-operated restaurant revenue decreased $16.9 million, or 8.6%, from the comparable period in the prior year. The decline in company-operated restaurant sales was primarily due to a $9.4 million decrease in revenue from the closure of four restaurants and the 16 company-operated restaurants sold by the Company to franchisees during or subsequent to the first quarter of 2019, a decrease in company-operated restaurant revenue of $8.7 million from a 4.7% decrease in company-operated comparable restaurant sales, which we believe was primarily related to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and a $0.4 million decrease due to temporary closures. This company-operated restaurant sales decrease was partially offset by an increase of $1.4 million of non-comparable restaurant sales on restaurants that

3934

Table of Contents

had not been open the fifteen months required to be included in comparable restaurant sales and a $0.2 million increase in revenue recognized for our loyalty points program. The company-operated comparable restaurant sales decrease consisted of a decline in transactions of 15.2%, partially offset by a 12.4% increase in average check size.

Franchise Revenue

For the quarter, franchise revenue ~~decreased $1.2~~increased $0.6 million, or ~~15.1%~~7.8%, from the comparable period in the prior year. This ~~decrease~~increase was primarily due to a franchise comparable restaurant sales ~~decrease~~increase of ~~10.6%, which we believe was primarily due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the closure of eight franchise locations during or subsequent to the second quarter of 2019~~10.5% and a decrease in fees received from franchised restaurants related to their use of our point-of-sales system. See above under “COVID-19 Impact” for additional information related to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our business. This franchise revenue decrease was partially offset by the opening of ~~two new franchised restaurants and revenue generated from 16 company-operated restaurants sold by the Company to franchisees during or subsequent to the second quarter of 2019.~~

Year-to-date, franchise revenue decreased $0.6 million, or 4.0%, from the comparable period in the prior year. This decrease was primarily due to a franchise comparable restaurant sales decrease of 6.4%, which we believe was primarily due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the closure of eight franchise locations during the same period and a decrease in fees received from franchised restaurants related to their use of our point-of-sales system. See above under “COVID-19 Impact” for additional information related to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our business. This franchise revenue decrease was partially offset by the opening of four new franchised restaurants and revenue generated from 16 company-operated restaurants sold by the Company to franchiseesthree units during or subsequent to the first quarter of ~~2019.~~2020. This franchise revenue increase was partially offset by the closure of seven franchise locations during or subsequent to the first quarter of 2020.

Franchise Advertising Fee Revenue

For the quarter, franchise advertising fee revenue ~~decreased~~increased $0.5 million, or ~~8.9%, from the comparable period in the prior year. Year-to-date, franchise advertising fee revenue decreased $0.4 million, or 3.8%~~8.8%, from the comparable period in the prior year. As advertising fee revenue is a percentage of franchisees’ revenue, ~~both~~ the ~~quarter and year-to-date increases~~quarter-to-date fluctuations were ~~primarily~~ due to ~~an increase~~the increases and decreases noted in ~~the number of~~ franchise ~~locations, partially offset by the lower comparable sales discussed~~revenue above.

Food and Paper Costs

For the quarter, food and paper costs decreased ~~$5.0~~$1.2 million, or ~~18.0%~~4.6%, from the comparable period in the prior year, primarily due to a ~~$4.3~~$1.2 million decrease in food costs and a $0.7 million decrease in paper costs. Year-to-date, food and paper costs decreased $6.6 million, or 12.0%, from the comparable period in the prior year, due to a $5.6 million decrease in food costs and a $1.0 million decrease in paper costs. The decrease in food and paper costs for the quarter ~~and year-to-date periods,~~ resulted primarily from lower company transactions ~~due to the COVID-19 pandemic~~ and ~~lower food waste.~~more effective waste management, partially offset by sales mix and commodity inflation. For the quarter, food and paper costs as a percentage of company-operated restaurant revenue were ~~26.1%~~25.9%, down from ~~27.8% in the comparable period of the prior year. Year-to-date, food and paper costs as a percentage of company-operated restaurant revenue were 26.9%, down from 27.9%~~27.6% in the comparable period of the prior year. The percentage decrease for the quarter ~~and year-to-date periods~~ was due primarily to an increase in pricing, lower food usage and effective waste management, partially offset by sales mix and commodity ~~inflation and unfavorable sales mix.~~inflation.

Labor and Related Expenses

For the quarter, labor and related expenses ~~decreased $3.5~~increased $2.0 million, or ~~12.0%, from the comparable period in the prior year. Year-to-date, labor and related expenses decreased $4.4 million, or 7.5%~~7.1%, from the comparable period in the prior year. The ~~decrease~~increase for the quarter ~~and year-to-date periods~~ was due ~~primarily~~ to ~~a reduction~~$2.8 million increase in labor ~~by restaurants closed or sold to franchisees, adjustments to~~costs associated with the ~~labor model based on dining room closures, operating hours~~COVID-19 pandemic and ~~lower sales volumes and lower group insurance expense due to decreased claims activity. These decreases were partially offset by~~$0.5 million higher wages primarily due to minimum wage increases in California ~~and, specifically, Los Angeles~~ during fiscal ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2020.~~2021. These increases were partially offset by $1.0 million in labor efficiencies and $0.3 million decrease in workers compensation expense due to decreased claims activity.

For the quarter, labor and related expenses as a percentage of company-operated restaurant revenue were ~~29.4%~~32.6%, ~~up from 29.2% in~~consistent with the comparable period in the prior year. ~~Year-to-date payroll and benefit expenses as a~~This percentage ~~of company-operated restaurant revenue were 30.2%, up from 29.8% in the comparable period in the prior year. The increases for the~~

~~Table of Contents~~

~~quarter and year-to-date periods were due primarily to sales deleverage,~~was impacted by wage increases in California ~~specifically, Los Angeles~~ and labor costs associated with the COVID-19 ~~pandemic. Partially offsetting these increases were the positive impacts of~~pandemic, offset by an increase in pricing and labor efficiencies.

Occupancy and Other Operating Expenses

For the quarter, occupancy and other operating expenses ~~decreased $1.1~~increased $1.7 million, or ~~4.8%~~7.8%, from the comparable period of the prior year. ~~The decrease was~~Fluctuations in occupancy and other expenses consisted primarily ~~due to~~of a ~~$0.5~~$0.6 million ~~decrease~~increase in ~~advertising expenses, a $0.5 million decrease in utilities costs,~~market place delivery fees, a $0.3 million ~~decrease in credit card fees, primarily related to a decrease in rates and transactions, a $0.3 million decrease in repair and maintenance costs, a $0.1 million decrease~~increase in occupancy costs, primarily related to ~~a reduction in~~ rent expense ~~from restaurants closed or sold to franchisees~~and higher general liability claims, a $0.3 million increase in repairs and maintenance costs, a $0.3 million increase in operating supplies, a $0.1 million increase in advertising fees, a $0.1 million increase in credit card charges and a ~~$0.3~~$0.1 million increase in utilities. These increases were partially offset by a $0.1 million decrease in other operating expenses. These decreases were partially offset by a $0.9 million increase in customer order delivery fees payable to third parties due to an increase in delivery orders. Year-to-date, occupancy and other operating expenses decreased $2.2 million, or 4.8%, from the comparable period of the prior year. The decrease was primarily due to a $0.8 million decrease in repair and maintenance costs, a $0.8 million decrease in advertising expenses, a $0.7 million decrease in utilities costs, a $0.6 million decrease in occupancy costs, primarily related to a reduction in rent expense from restaurants closed or sold to franchisees, a $0.3 million decrease in credit card fees primarily related to a decrease in rates and transactions, and a $0.3 million decrease in other operating expenses. These decreases were partially offset by a $1.3 million increase in customer order delivery fees payable to third parties due to an increase in delivery orders.

For the quarter, occupancy and other operating expenses as a percentage of company-operated restaurant revenue were ~~25.0%~~25.3% up from ~~23.0%~~23.9% in the comparable period in the prior year. ~~Year-to-date, occupancy and other operating expenses as a percentage of company-operated restaurant revenue were 24.4%, up from 23.4% in the comparable period of the prior year.~~ The increases for the quarter ~~and year-to-date periods~~ resulted primarily from the increases noted ~~above and sales deleverage.~~above.

General and Administrative Expenses

For the quarter, general and administrative expenses increased $1.1 million, or ~~11.9%~~12.2%, from the comparable period in the prior year. The increase for the quarter was due primarily to a ~~$1.9~~$0.6 million increase in legal expenses, primarily related to a $2.5 million settlement accrual related to an agreement in principle to resolve the longstanding lawsuit involving a contract dispute with one of the Company’s franchisees concerning asserted territory rights, partially offset by a $0.7 million decrease in labor related costs, primarily related to ~~a decrease~~an increase in management bonus expense, a $0.3 million increase in legal and professional expenses, a $0.3 million increase in stock compensation expenses and a $0.1 million increase in restaurant pre-opening costs. This increase was partially offset by $0.1 million decrease in recruiting costs and a $0.1 million decrease in other general and administrative expenses. Year-to-date, general and administrative expenses decreased $0.9 million, or 4.3%, from the comparable period in the prior year. The decrease for the year-to-date period was due primarily to a $1.3 million decrease in labor related costs, primarily related to a decrease in management bonus expense. This decrease was partially offset by a $0.3 million increase in legal expenses related primarily to a $2.5 million legal settlement accrual, discussed above, partially offset by a decrease in securities class action litigation costs, and a $0.1 million increase in other general and administrative expenses.

Table of Contents

For the quarter, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of total revenue were ~~10.5%~~9.7%, up from ~~8.2%~~8.9% in the comparable period of the prior year. The percentage increase isfor the quarter-to-date period resulted primarily ~~due to the decline in revenue, as well as~~from the cost increases discussed above. Year-to-date, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of total revenue were 9.7%, up from 9.3% in the comparable period of the prior year. The percentage increase is primarily due to the decline in revenue, partially offset by the cost decreases discussed above.

~~Recovery of Securities Class Action Legal Expenses and Other Insurance Claims~~

During the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 24, 2020, we received insurance proceeds of $0.1 million related to a property claim. During the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 26, 2019, we received insurance proceeds of $10.0 million related to the settlement of the securities class action lawsuit. See Note 7, Commitments and Contingencies, Legal Matters.

~~Loss on Disposition of Restaurants~~

~~Table of Contents~~

Phoenix area to another existing franchisee. We determined that these restaurant dispositions represent multiple element arrangements, and as a result, the cash consideration received was allocated to the separate elements based on their relative selling price. Cash proceeds included upfront consideration for the sale of the restaurants and franchise fees, as well as future cash consideration for royalties and lease payments. We also considered the future lease payments in allocating the initial cash consideration received. The cash consideration per restaurant for franchise fees is consistent with the amounts stated in the related franchise agreements, which are charged for separate standalone arrangements. We initially defer and subsequently recognize the franchise fees over the term of the franchise agreement. Future royalty income is also recognized in revenue as earned.

These sales resulted in cash proceeds of $4.8 million and a net loss on sale of restaurants of $0.9 million and $5.1 million for the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 26, 2019, respectively. These restaurants are included in the total number of franchised El Pollo Loco restaurants.

Impairment and Closed-Store Reserves

During the thirteen ~~and twenty-six~~ weeks ended ~~June 24, 2020,~~March 31, 2021, we ~~recognized a $0.1 million and $2.0 million~~recorded non-cash impairment ~~charge,~~charges of $0.3 million, primarily related to the carrying value of the ROU assets of one restaurant in Texas closed in 2019 and the long-lived assets of three restaurants in California. During ~~each of~~ the thirteen ~~and twenty-six~~ weeks ended ~~June 26, 2019,~~March 25, 2020, we recorded a non-cash impairment charge of ~~$0.2~~$1.9 million, primarily related to the carrying value of the assets of one restaurant in Texas and the long-lived assets of three restaurants in California. Given the inherent uncertainty in projecting results for newer restaurants in newer markets, as well as the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Company is monitoring the recoverability of the carrying value of the assets of several restaurants on an ongoing basis. For these restaurants, if expected performance is not realized, an impairment charge may be recognized in future periods, and such charge could be material.

When a restaurant is closed, we will evaluate the ROU asset for impairment, based on anticipated sublease recoveries. The remaining value of the ROU asset is amortized on a straight-line basis, with the expense recognized in closed-store reserve expense. Additionally, any property tax and CAM payments relating to closed restaurants are included within closed-store expense. During the thirteen ~~and twenty-six~~ weeks ended ~~June 24, 2020,~~March 31, 2021, we recognized ~~$0.4~~$0.3 million ~~and $0.9 million, respectively,~~ of closed-store reserve expense related to the amortization of ROU assets, property taxes and CAM payments for our closed locations. During the ~~twenty-six~~thirteen weeks ended ~~June 26, 2019,~~March 25, 2020, we ~~closed one restaurant in California and one restaurant in Texas and~~ recognized ~~$0.3 million and $0.6~~$0.5 million of closed-store reserve expense, ~~for the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 26, 2019, respectively,~~ primarily related to the amortization of ROU assets, property taxes and CAM payments for our closed locations.

Interest Expense, Net

For ~~each of~~ the quarter, ~~and year-to-date periods,~~ interest expense, net, ~~was consistent with~~decreased $0.4 million from the comparable period in the prior ~~period.~~year. The decrease is primarily related to lower interest rates and lower outstanding balances on our 2018 Revolver.

Income Tax Receivable Agreement

On July 30, 2014, we entered into the TRA. The TRA calls for us to pay to our pre-IPO stockholders 85% of the savings in cash that we realize in our taxes as a result of utilizing our ~~net operating losses~~NOLs and other tax attributes attributable to preceding periods. For the thirteen ~~and twenty-six~~ weeks ended ~~June 24, 2020~~March 31, 2021, we recorded income tax receivable agreement ~~expense~~income of ~~$0.3~~less than $0.1 million, ~~and $0.2 million, respectively,~~ and for the thirteen ~~and twenty-six~~ weeks ended ~~June 26, 2019~~March 25, 2020 we recorded income tax receivable agreement income of $0.1 ~~million and income tax receivable agreement expense of $0.1 million, respectively.~~million.

Provision for Income Taxes

For the quarter ended ~~June 24,~~March 31, 2021, we recorded an income tax provision of $1.6 million, reflecting an estimated effective tax rate of 28.7%. For the quarter ended March 25, 2020, we recorded an income tax provision of ~~$0.8 million, reflecting an estimated effective tax rate of 12.0%. For the quarter ended June 26, 2019, we recorded an income tax provision of $5.7~~$1.3 million, reflecting an estimated effective tax rate of approximately 28.7%. Year-to-date ended June 24, 2020, we recorded an income tax provision of $2.1 million, reflecting an estimated effective tax rate of approximately 18.4%. Year-to-date ended June 26, 2019 we recorded an income tax provision of $6.0 million, reflecting an estimated effective tax rate of approximately 28.6%%26.5%. The difference between the 21.0% statutory rate and the Company’s effective tax rate of ~~18.4%~~28.7% for the ~~year-to-date~~quarter ended ~~June 24, 2020~~March 31, 2021 is primarily a result of state taxes, a Work Opportunity Tax Credit benefit, the change in valuation allowance against certain state credits, as a ~~result of future forecasted income apportioned to the state~~

~~Table of Contents~~

~~jurisdiction, non-deductible executive compensation, changes to total expected TRA payments due to changes in future forecasted taxable income and~~ windfall tax benefit related to stock options exercised ~~recorded as a discrete item during the thirteen~~ and ~~twenty-six weeks ended June 24, 2020.~~non-deductible executive compensation.

Key Performance Indicators

To evaluate the performance of our business, we utilize a variety of financial and performance measures. These key measures include company-operated restaurant revenue, system-wide sales, comparable restaurant sales, ~~company-operated average unit volumes,~~ restaurant contribution, restaurant contribution margin, new restaurant openings, EBITDA, and Adjusted EBITDA.

System-Wide Sales

System-wide sales are neither required by, nor presented in accordance with, accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). System-wide sales are the sum of company-operated restaurant revenue and sales from franchised restaurants. Our total revenue in our consolidated statements of operations is limited to company-operated restaurant revenue and franchise revenue from our franchisees. Accordingly, system-wide sales should not be

Table of Contents

considered in isolation or as a substitute for our results as reported under GAAP. Management believes that system-wide sales are an important figure for investors, because they are widely used in the restaurant industry, including by our management, to evaluate brand scale and market penetration.

The following table reconciles system-wide sales to company-operated restaurant revenue and total revenue:


	Thirteen Weeks Ended
(Dollar amounts in thousands)	March 31, 2021		March 25, 2020
Company-operated restaurant revenue	$	94,161	$	92,634
Franchise revenue		7,612		7,062
Franchise advertising fee revenue		5,948		5,467
Total Revenue		107,721		105,163
Franchise revenue		(7,612)		(7,062)
Franchise advertising fee revenue		(5,948)		(5,467)
Sales from franchised restaurants		132,965		125,824
System-wide sales	$	227,126	$	218,458

Company-Operated Restaurant Revenue

Company-operated restaurant revenue consists of sales of food and beverages in company-operated restaurants net of promotional allowances, employee meals, and other discounts. Company-operated restaurant revenue in any period is directly influenced by the number of operating weeks in such period, the number of open restaurants, and comparable restaurant sales.

Seasonal factors and the timing of holidays cause our revenue to fluctuate from quarter to quarter. Our revenue per restaurant is typically lower in the first and fourth quarters due to reduced January and December traffic and higher in the second and third quarters. As a result of seasonality, our quarterly and annual results of operations and key performance indicators such as company-operated restaurant revenue and comparable restaurant sales may fluctuate. In addition, we expect our quarterly company-operated restaurant revenue and comparable restaurant sales to continue to fluctuate significantly due to the current COVID-19 pandemic. See above under “COVID-19 Impact” for additional information related to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our business.

Comparable Restaurant Sales

Comparable restaurant sales reflect year-over-year sales changes for comparable company-operated, franchised, and system-wide restaurants. A restaurant enters our comparable restaurant base the first full week after it has operated for fifteen months. Comparable restaurant sales exclude restaurants closed during the applicable period. At ~~June 24,~~March 31, 2021 and March 25, 2020, ~~and June 26, 2019,~~ there were ~~469~~465 and ~~459~~472 comparable restaurants, 191 and ~~199~~191 company-operated restaurants and ~~278~~274 and ~~260~~281 franchised restaurants, respectively. Comparable restaurant sales indicate the performance of existing restaurants, since new restaurants are excluded.

Comparable restaurant sales growth can be generated by an increase in the number of meals sold and/or by increases in the average check amount, resulting from a shift in menu mix and/or higher prices resulting from new products or price increases.

~~Company-Operated Average Unit Volumes~~

We measure company-operated average unit volumes (“AUVs”) on both a weekly and an annual basis. Weekly AUVs consist of comparable restaurant sales over a seven-day period from Thursday to Wednesday. Annual AUVs are calculated using the following methodology: First, we divide our total net sales for all company-operated restaurants for the fiscal year by the total number of restaurant operating weeks during the same period. Second, we annualize that average weekly per-restaurant sales figure by multiplying it by 52. An operating week is defined as a restaurant open for business over a seven-day period from Thursday to Wednesday. This measurement allows management to assess changes in consumer spending patterns at our restaurants and the overall performance of our restaurant base.

Restaurant Contribution and Restaurant Contribution Margin

Restaurant contribution and restaurant contribution margin are neither required by, nor presented in accordance with, GAAP. Restaurant contribution is defined as company-operated restaurant revenue less company restaurant expenses which includes food and paper cost, labor and related expenses and occupancy and other operating expenses, where applicable. Restaurant contribution excludes certain costs, such as general and administrative expenses, depreciation and amortization, impairment and closed-store reserve and other costs that are considered normal operating costs and accordingly, restaurant contribution is not indicative of overall Company results and does not accrue directly to the

~~Table of Contents~~

benefit of stockholders because of the exclusion of certain corporate-level expenses. Restaurant contribution margin is defined as restaurant contribution as a percentage of net company-operated restaurant revenue.

Table of Contents

Restaurant contribution and restaurant contribution margin are supplemental measures of operating performance of our restaurants, and our calculations thereof may not be comparable to those reported by other companies. Restaurant contribution and restaurant contribution margin have limitations as analytical tools, and you should not consider them in isolation, or superior to, or as substitutes for the analysis of our results as reported under GAAP. Management uses restaurant contribution and restaurant contribution margin as key metrics to evaluate the profitability of incremental sales at our restaurants, to evaluate our restaurant performance across periods, and to evaluate our restaurant financial performance compared with our competitors. Management believes that restaurant contribution and restaurant contribution margin are important tools for investors, because they are widely-used metrics within the restaurant industry to evaluate restaurant-level productivity, efficiency, and performance. Restaurant contribution and restaurant contribution margin may also assist investors in evaluating our business and performance relative to industry peers and provide greater transparency with respect to the Company’s financial condition and results of operation.

A reconciliation of restaurant contribution and restaurant contribution margin to company-operated restaurant revenue is provided below:


	Thirteen Weeks Ended						Twenty-Six Weeks Ended						Thirteen Weeks Ended
(Dollar amounts in thousands)	June 24, 2020			June 26, 2019			June 24, 2020			June 26, 2019			March 31, 2021			March 25, 2020
Restaurant contribution:
Income from operations	$	7,449		$	20,580		$	13,135		$	22,872		$	6,001		$	5,686
Add (less):
General and administrative expenses		10,465			9,348			19,796			20,696			10,474			9,331
Franchise expenses		6,627			7,542			13,538			13,686			7,751			6,911
Depreciation and amortization		4,168			4,454			8,537			9,215			3,938			4,369
Loss on disposal of assets		27			134			127			178			26			100
Franchise revenue		(6,719)			(7,918)			(13,781)			(14,362)			(7,612)			(7,062)
Franchise advertising fee revenue		(5,178)			(5,683)			(10,645)			(11,066)			(5,948)			(5,467)
Recovery of securities lawsuits related legal expenses and other insurance claims		(123)			(10,000)			(123)			(10,000)
Impairment and closed-store reserves		437			565			2,839			874			564			2,402
Loss on sale of restaurants		—			927			—			5,051
Restaurant contribution	$	17,153		$	19,949		$	33,423		$	37,144		$	15,194		$	16,270

Company-operated restaurant revenue:
Total revenue	$	99,604		$	113,740		$	204,767		$	222,717		$	107,721		$	105,163
Less:
Franchise revenue		(6,719)			(7,918)			(13,781)			(14,362)			(7,612)			(7,062)
Franchise advertising fee revenue		(5,178)			(5,683)			(10,645)			(11,066)			(5,948)			(5,467)
Company-operated restaurant revenue	$	87,707		$	100,139		$	180,341		$	197,289		$	94,161		$	92,634

Restaurant contribution margin (%)		19.6	%		19.9	%		18.5	%		18.8	%		16.1	%		17.6	%

New Restaurant Openings

The number of restaurant openings reflects the number of new restaurants opened by us and our franchisees during a particular reporting period. Before a new restaurant opens, we and our franchisees incur pre-opening costs, as described below. New restaurants often open with an initial start-up period of higher than normal sales volumes, which subsequently decrease to stabilized levels. New restaurants typically experience normal inefficiencies in the form of higher food and paper, labor, and other direct operating expenses and, as a result, restaurant contribution margins are generally lower during the start-up period of operation. The average start-up period after which our new restaurants’ revenue and expenses normalize is approximately fourteen weeks. When we enter new markets, we may be exposed to start-up times and restaurant contribution margins that are longer and lower than reflected in our average historical experience.

~~Table of Contents~~

EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA

EBITDA represents net income before interest expense, provision for income taxes, depreciation, and amortization. Adjusted EBITDA represents net income before interest expense, provision for income taxes, depreciation, amortization, and items that we do not consider representative of our on-going operating performance, as identified in the reconciliation table below.

Table of Contents

EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA as presented in this report are supplemental measures of our performance that are neither required by, nor presented in accordance with, GAAP. EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are not measurements of our financial performance under GAAP and should not be considered as alternatives to net income, operating income, or any other performance measures derived in accordance with GAAP, or as alternatives to cash flow from operating activities as a measure of our liquidity. In addition, in evaluating EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA, you should be aware that in the future we will incur expenses or charges such as those added back to calculate EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA. Our presentation of EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA should not be construed as an inference that our future results will be unaffected by unusual or nonrecurring items.

EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA have limitations as analytical tools, and you should not consider them in isolation, or as substitutes for analysis of our results as reported under GAAP. Some of these limitations are (i) they do not reflect our cash expenditures, or future requirements for capital expenditures or contractual commitments, (ii) they do not reflect changes in, or cash requirements for, our working capital needs, (iii) they do not reflect the significant interest expense, or the cash requirements necessary to service interest or principal payments, on our debt, (iv) although depreciation and amortization are non-cash charges, the assets being depreciated and amortized will often have to be replaced in the future, and EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA do not reflect any cash requirements for such replacements, (v) they do not adjust for all non-cash income or expense items that are reflected in our statements of cash flows, (vi) they do not reflect the impact of earnings or charges resulting from matters we consider not to be indicative of our on-going operations, and (vii) other companies in our industry may calculate these measures differently than we do, limiting their usefulness as comparative measures.

We compensate for these limitations by providing specific information regarding the GAAP amounts excluded from such non-GAAP financial measures. We further compensate for the limitations in our use of non-GAAP financial measures by presenting comparable GAAP measures more prominently.

We believe that EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA facilitate operating performance comparisons from period to period by isolating the effects of some items that vary from period to period without any correlation to core operating performance or that vary widely among similar companies. These potential differences may be caused by variations in capital structures (affecting interest expense), tax positions (such as the impact on periods or companies of changes in effective tax rates or ~~net operating losses)~~NOL) and the age and book depreciation of facilities and equipment (affecting relative depreciation expense). We also present EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA because (i) we believe that these measures are frequently used by securities analysts, investors and other interested parties to evaluate companies in our industry, (ii) we believe that investors will find these measures useful in assessing our ability to service or incur indebtedness, and (iii) we use EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA internally for a number of benchmarks including to compare our performance to that of our ~~competitors and for compensation performance benchmarks.~~competitors.

~~Table of Contents~~

The following table sets forth reconciliations of our net income to our EBITDA and Adjusted ~~EBITDA to our net income:~~EBITDA:


	Thirteen Weeks Ended				Twenty-Six Weeks Ended				Thirteen Weeks Ended
(Amounts in thousands)	June 24, 2020		June 26, 2019		June 24, 2020		June 26, 2019		March 31, 2021		March 25, 2020
Net income	$	5,499	$	14,087	$	9,099	$	15,000	$	3,964	$	3,600
Non-GAAP adjustments:
Provision for income taxes		752		5,665		2,053		6,014		1,597		1,301
Interest expense, net of interest income		908		922		1,813		1,781		517		905
Depreciation and amortization		4,168		4,454		8,537		9,215		3,938		4,369
EBITDA	$	11,327	$	25,128	$	21,502	$	32,010	$	10,016	$	10,175
Stock-based compensation expense (a)		727		641		1,261		1,129		853		534
Loss on disposal of assets (b)		27		134		127		178		26		100
Recovery of securities lawsuits related legal expense and other insurance claims (c)		(123)		(10,000)		(123)		(10,000)
Impairment and closed-store reserves (d)		437		565		2,839		874
Loss on disposition of restaurants (e)		—		927		—		5,051
Income tax receivable agreement expense (income) (f)		290		(94)		170		77
Securities class action legal expense (g)		37		491		238		2,630
Legal settlements (h)		2,499		—		2,566		—
Pre-opening costs (i)		59		35		110		35
Executive transition costs (j)		—		63		—		100
Impairment and closed-store reserves (c)										564		2,402
Income tax receivable agreement income (d)										(77)		(120)
Securities class action legal expense (e)										364		201
Legal settlements (f)										—		67
Pre-opening costs (g)										163		51
Adjusted EBITDA	$	15,280	$	17,890	$	28,690	$	32,084	$	11,909	$	13,410

(a)	Includes non-cash, stock-based compensation.

Table of Contents

(b)	Loss on disposal of assets includes the loss on disposal of assets related to retirements and replacement or write-off of leasehold improvements or equipment.

(c)

~~(d)~~

Includes costs related to impairment of long-lived and ROU assets and closing restaurants. During the thirteen ~~and twenty-six~~ weeks ended ~~June 24,~~March 31, 2021, we recorded non-cash impairment charges of $0.3 million, primarily related to the carrying value of the ROU assets of one restaurant in Texas closed in 2019 and the long-lived assets of three restaurants in California. During the thirteen weeks ended March 25, 2020, we ~~recognized~~recorded a ~~$0.1 million and $2.0 million~~ non-cash impairment charge of $1.9 million, primarily related to the carrying value of the ROU assets of one restaurant in Texas and the long-lived assets of three restaurants in California. During the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 26, 2019, we recorded a non-cash impairment charge of $0.2 million, primarily related to the carrying value of the assets of one restaurant in California. Given the difficulty in projecting results for newer restaurants in newer markets, as well as the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Company is monitoring the recoverability of the carrying value of the assets of several restaurants on an ongoing basis. For these restaurants, if expected performance is not realized, an impairment charge may be recognized in future periods, and such charge could be material.

When a restaurant is closed, we will evaluate the ROU asset for impairment, based on anticipated sublease recoveries. The remaining value of the ROU asset is amortized on a straight-line basis, with the expense recognized in closed-store reserve expense. Additionally, any property tax and CAM payments relating to closed restaurants are included within closed-store expense. During the thirteen ~~and twenty-six~~ weeks ended ~~June 24, 2020,~~March 31, 2021, we recognized ~~$0.4~~$0.3 million ~~and $0.9 million, respectively,~~ of closed-store reserve expense related to the amortization of ROU assets, property taxes and CAM payments for our closed locations. During the ~~twenty-six~~thirteen weeks ended ~~June 26, 2019,~~March 25, 2020, we ~~closed one restaurant in California and one restaurant in Texas, and~~ recognized ~~$0.3 million and $0.6~~$0.5 million of closed-store reserve expense, ~~for the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 26, 2019, respectively,~~ primarily related to the amortization of ROU assets, property taxes and CAM payments for our closed locations.

~~(e)~~

During the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 26, 2019, we completed the sale of four company-operated restaurants within the San Francisco area to an existing franchisee and seven company-operated restaurants in the Phoenix area to another existing franchisee. These sales resulted in cash proceeds of $4.8 million and a net loss on sale of restaurants of $0.9 million and $5.1 million for the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 26, 2019, respectively. These restaurants are now included in our franchised restaurant totals.

~~(f)~~(d)

On July 30, 2014, we entered into the TRA. This agreement calls for us to pay to our pre-IPO stockholders 85% of the savings in cash that we realize in our taxes as a result of utilizing our ~~net operating losses~~NOL and other tax attributes

~~Table of Contents~~

attributable to preceding periods. For the thirteen ~~and twenty-six~~ weeks ended ~~June 24,~~March 31, 2021 and March 25, 2020, ~~and June 26, 2019,~~ income tax receivable agreement (income) expense ~~(income)~~ consisted of the amortization of interest expense and changes in estimates for actual tax returns filed, related to our total expected TRA payments.

~~(g)~~(e)

Consists of costs related to the defense of securities lawsuits. See ~~"Note~~Note 7, ~~Commitments~~“Commitments and Contingencies, Legal ~~Matters."~~Matters” in the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements above.

~~(h)~~(f)

Includes an accrual related to an agreement in principle to resolve the longstanding lawsuit involving a contract dispute with one of the Company’s franchisees concerning asserted territory rights, as well as amounts incurred related to the payment of the final settlement amounts for ~~consolidated~~multiple wage and hour class action ~~lawsuits resolved in prior quarters.~~suits.

~~(i)~~(g)

Pre-opening costs are a component of general and administrative expenses, and consist of costs directly associated with the opening of new restaurants and incurred prior to opening, including management labor costs, staff labor costs during training, food and supplies used during training, marketing costs, and other related pre-opening costs. These are generally incurred over the three to five months prior to opening. Pre-opening costs also include occupancy costs incurred between the date of possession and the opening date for a restaurant.

~~(j)~~

~~Includes costs associated with the transition of our CEO, such as CEO sign-on bonus.~~

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our primary sources of liquidity and capital resources have been cash provided from operations, cash and cash equivalents, and the 2018 Revolver. Our primary requirements for liquidity and capital are new restaurants, existing restaurant capital investments (remodels and maintenance), legal defense costs, lease obligations, interest payments on our debt, ~~lease obligations, and~~ working capital and general corporate needs. ~~However, in light of the COVID-19 pandemic, we have temporarily suspended all new restaurants and capital investments.~~ Our working capital requirements are not significant, since our customers pay for their purchases in cash or by payment card (credit or debit) at the time of sale. Thus, we are able to sell many of our inventory items before we have to pay our ~~suppliers for them.~~suppliers. Our restaurants do not require significant inventories or receivables. We believe that ~~our~~these sources of liquidity and capital are sufficient to finance our continued operations for at least the next ~~twelve~~12 months from the ~~filing~~issuance of the ~~condensed~~ consolidated financial statements. However, depending on the severity and longevity of the COVID-19 pandemic, the efforts taken to reduce its spread ~~(including government-mandated closures of our dining rooms)~~ and the possibility of a subsequent resurgence of the COVID-19 outbreak after the current outbreak subsides, our financial performance and liquidity could be further impacted and could impact our ability to meet certain financial covenants required in our 2018 Credit Agreement (as defined below), specifically the lease-adjusted coverage ratio and fixed-charge coverage ratio.

The following table presents summary cash flow information for the periods indicated.

Twenty-Six Weeks Ended

(Amounts in thousands)

June 24, 2020

June 26, 2019

Net cash provided by (used in)





Operating activities

$
11,082

$
12,859

Investing activities

(2,479)

(1,128)

Financing activities

43,669

(7,419)

Net increase in cash

$
52,272

$
4,312


	Thirteen Weeks Ended
(Amounts in thousands)	March 31, 2021		March 25, 2020
Net cash provided by (used in)
Operating activities	$	7,398	$	(7,526)
Investing activities		(5,257)		(1,632)
Financing activities		(8,691)		44,492
Net increase (decrease) in cash	$	(6,550)	$	35,334

~~Operating Activities~~

For the twenty-six weeks ended June 24, 2020, net cash provided by operating activities decreased by approximately $1.8 million from the comparable period of the prior year. This was due primarily to a decline in profitability after non-cash items, which we believe related to the COVID-19 pandemic, and unfavorable working capital fluctuations.

~~Investing Activities~~

For the twenty-six weeks ended June 24, 2020, net cash used in investing activities increased by $1.4 million from the comparable period of the prior year. This was due primarily to cash proceeds of $4.8 million received during the twenty-six weeks ended June 26, 2019 related to the sale of four company-operated restaurants within the San Francisco area to an existing franchisee and seven company-operated restaurants in the Phoenix area to another existing franchisee. In addition, there was one new company restaurant, which was in process prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, and no

4740

Table of Contents

~~remodels completed in twenty-six weeks ended June 24, 2020 and no new company stores and three remodels completed in the twenty-six weeks ended June 26, 2019.~~

~~Given the uncertainty surrounding the severity and longevity of the COVID-19 pandemic, as a precautionary measure we have significantly reduced capital spending.~~

~~Financing~~Operating Activities

For the ~~twenty-six~~thirteen weeks ended ~~June 24, 2020,~~March 31, 2021, net cash ~~provided~~from operating activities changed by ~~financing~~approximately $15.0 million from the comparable period of the prior year. This change was due primarily to a $16.3 million payment made in the first quarter of 2020 related to our wage and hour class action settlements for the thirteen weeks ended March 25, 2020, slightly offset by unfavorable working capital fluctuations.

Investing Activities

For the thirteen weeks ended March 31, 2021, net cash used in investing activities increased by ~~$51.1~~$3.7 million from the comparable period of the prior year. This increase was due primarily to opening two new company-operated restaurant and remodeling three restaurants in the thirteen weeks ended March 31, 2021 compared to opening no new company-operated restaurants and completing no new remodels in the thirteen weeks ended March 25, 2020.

Financing Activities

For the thirteen weeks ended March 31, 2021, net cash from in financing activities changed by $53.2 million from the comparable period of the prior year. This change was due primarily to an increase in net borrowings of ~~$30.8~~$44.5 million on the 2018 Revolver during the ~~twenty-six~~thirteen weeks ended ~~June 24,~~March 25, 2020, primarily as a precautionary measure to bolster our existing cash position in light of the ~~current~~ COVID-19 pandemic, as well as to provide for the $16.3 million litigation settlement payment. In addition, ~~for~~ during the ~~twenty-six~~thirteen weeks ended ~~June 26, 2019,~~March 31, 2021, the Company ~~had $18.2~~paid down $9.0 million ~~of cash outflow related to stock buybacks.~~on the 2018 Revolver.

Debt and Other Obligations

~~On July 13,~~The 2018 ~~the Company entered into~~Revolver, which is available pursuant to the 2018 Credit Agreement, ~~which provides for the 2018 Revolver to refinance the previous 2014 Revolver. The 2018 Revolver~~ includes a sub limit of $15.0 million for letters of credit and a sub limit of $15.0 million for swingline loans. The 2018 Revolver and 2018 Credit Agreement will mature on July 13, 2023. The obligations under the 2018 Credit Agreement and related loan documents are guaranteed by the Company and Intermediate. The obligations of the Company, EPL and Intermediate under the 2018 Credit Agreement and related loan documents are secured by a first priority lien on substantially all of their respective assets.

Borrowings under the 2018 Credit Agreement (other than any swingline loans) bear interest, at the borrower’s option, at rates based upon either LIBOR or a base rate, plus, for each rate, a margin determined in accordance with a lease-adjusted consolidated leverage ratio-based pricing grid. The base rate is calculated as the highest of (a) the federal funds rate plus 0.50%, (b) the published Bank of America prime rate, or (c) LIBOR plus 1.00%. For LIBOR loans, the margin is in the range of 1.25% to 2.25%, and for base rate loans the margin is in a range of 0.25% to 1.25%. Borrowings under the 2018 Revolver may be repaid and reborrowed. The interest rate range was ~~1.67%~~1.36% to ~~3.11%~~1.65% for the thirteen weeks ended March 31, 2021, and ~~1.67%~~3.11% to 3.29% for the thirteen ~~and twenty-six~~ weeks ended ~~June 24, 2020, respectively, and 3.90% to 6.00% for each of the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 26, 2019.~~March 25, 2020.

The 2018 Credit Agreement contains certain financial covenants. The Company was in compliance with the financial covenants as of ~~June 24, 2020.~~March 31, 2021. However, depending on the severity and longevity of the COVID-19 pandemic, the efforts taken to reduce its spread and the possibility of a resurgence of the COVID-19 outbreak after the initial outbreak subside, the Company’s financial performance and liquidity could be further impacted and could impact the Company’s

Table of Contents

ability to comply with certain financial covenants required in our 2018 Credit Agreement, specifically the lease-adjusted coverage ratio and fixed-charge coverage ratio.

At ~~June 24, 2020, $11.1~~March 31, 2021, $8.4 million of letters of credit and ~~$138.8~~$53.8 million of borrowings were outstanding under the 2018 Revolver. There were ~~$0.1~~$87.8 million remaining borrowings available under the 2018 Revolver at ~~June 24, 2020.~~March 31, 2021.

~~Table of Contents~~

During the year ended December 25, 2019, we entered into an interest rate swap with a notional amount of $40.0 million, related to the outstanding borrowings under our 2018 Revolver. The interest rate swap was designated as a cash flow hedge and effectively converted a portion of our outstanding borrowings to a fixed rate of 1.31%, plus the applicable margin spread, which ~~is currently~~was 1.5%. for the thirteen weeks ended March 31, 2021. The interest rate swap matures in June 2023.

Contractual Obligations

~~Our~~Other than our paydown of $9.0 million on the 2018 Revolver during the thirteen weeks ended March 31, 2021 described above, our contractual obligations outstanding on ~~June 24, 2020~~March 31, 2021 have not changed materially since those disclosed under “Debt and Other Obligations – Contractual Obligations” in Part II, Item 7 of our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 25, 2019 other than an increase in net borrowings of $41.8 million on the 2018 Revolver during the twenty-six weeks ended June 24, 2020 and the impact of our delay in making April, May and June rent payments on the majority of our leased properties. Refer to COVID-19 impact in "Overview" section above for additional information.30, 2020. Our contractual commitments relate to future (i) debt payments, including expected interest expense, calculated based on current interest rates, (ii) restaurant operating lease payments, (iii) income tax receivable agreement payments, and (iv) purchasing commitments for chicken.

Off-Balance Sheet and Other Arrangements

As of ~~June 24, 2020,~~March 31, 2021 and December 25, ~~2019,~~2020, we were using ~~$11.1~~$8.4 million of borrowing capacity on the 2018 Revolver for letters of credit in support of our insurance programs, as well as to support our Surety demand related to an appeal bond used to secure a judgment against the Company. See additional information presented in "Note 7 Commitments and Contingencies—Legal Matters" in the accompanying "Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements."programs.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

Interest Rate Risk

We are exposed to market risk from changes in ~~the~~ interest ~~rate~~rates on our debt, which bears interest, at ~~our option, at rates based on~~USD LIBOR ~~or a base rate,~~ plus ~~for each rate,~~ a margin ~~determined in accordance with the terms of the 2018 Credit Agreement. For LIBOR loans, the margin is in the range of~~between 1.25% and 2.25%. As of ~~June 24, 2020,~~March 31, 2021, we had outstanding borrowings of ~~$138.8~~$53.8 million under our 2018 Revolver, ~~$11.1~~$8.4 million of letters of credit in support of our insurance programs, and the applicable margin on outstanding borrowings under 2018 Revolver was 1.5%. In addition, ~~there~~ LIBOR is ~~currently uncertainty around whether LIBOR will continue~~expected to ~~exist~~be phased out beginning after 2021. IfOrganizations are currently working on industry wide and company specific transition plans as it relates to financial and other derivative contracts exposed to LIBOR. When LIBOR ceases to exist, we may need to enter into an amendment to the 2018 Credit Agreement and we cannot predict what alternative index would be negotiated with our lenders. If future rates based upon a successor rate are higher than LIBOR rates as currently determined or if our lenders have increased costs due to changes in LIBOR, we may experience potential increases in interest rates on our variable rate debt, which could adversely impact our interest expense, results of operations and cash flows. After giving effect to the $40.0 million of interest rate swaps described below, we effectively had ~~$98.8~~$13.8 million of long-term debt subject to variations in interest rates as of March 31, 2021 and a one percent increase in the variable rate of interest would increase annual interest expense by ~~$1.0~~$0.1 million.

We manage our interest rate risk through normal operating and financing activities and, when determined appropriate, through the use of derivative financial instruments. To balance our portfolio, we entered into an interest rate swap during the year ended December 25, 2019 with a notional amount of $40.0 million, related to the outstanding borrowings under our 2018 Revolver. The interest rate swap was designated as a cash flow hedge and effectively converted a portion of our outstanding borrowings to a fixed rate of 1.31%, plus applicable margin, which ~~is currently~~was 1.5%. for the thirteen weeks ended March 31, 2021. The interest rate swap matures in June 2023.

Inflation

Inflation has an impact on food, paper, construction, utility, labor and benefits, general and administrative, and other costs, all of which can materially impact our operations. We have a substantial number of hourly employees who are paid wage rates at or based on the applicable federal, state, or local minimum wage, and increases in the minimum wage will increase our labor costs. In general, we have been able to substantially offset cost increases resulting from inflation

Table of Contents

by increasing menu prices, managing menu mix, improving productivity, or making other adjustments. We may not be able to offset cost increases in the future.

~~Table of Contents~~

Commodity Price Risk

We are exposed to market price fluctuation in food product prices. Given the historical volatility of certain of our food product prices, including chicken, other proteins, grains, produce, dairy products, and cooking oil, these fluctuations can materially impact our food and beverage costs. While our purchasing commitments partially mitigate the risk of such fluctuations, there is no assurance that supply and demand factors such as disease or inclement weather will not cause the prices of the commodities used in our restaurant operations to fluctuate. In periods when the prices of commodities drop, we may pay higher prices under our purchasing commitments. In rapidly fluctuating commodities markets, it may prove difficult for us to adjust our menu prices in accordance with input price fluctuations. Therefore, to the extent that we do not pass along cost increases to our customers, our results of operations may be adversely affected. At this time, we do not use financial instruments to hedge our commodity risk.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures.

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) of the Exchange Act) that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Our disclosure controls and procedures are based on assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and even effective disclosure controls and procedures can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives. Because of their inherent limitations, we cannot guarantee that our disclosure controls and procedures will succeed in achieving their stated objectives in all cases, that they will be complied with in all cases, or that they will prevent or detect all misstatements.

Our management has evaluated, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective, at the reasonable assurance level, as of ~~June 24, 2020.~~March 31, 2021.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

No changes in our internal control over financial reporting occurred during the quarter ended ~~June 24, 2020~~March 31, 2021 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

5043

Table of Contents

PART II—OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings.

For information regarding legal proceedings, see ~~"Note 7. Commitments~~Note 7, “Commitments and Contingencies—Legal ~~Matters"~~Matters” in the ~~accompanying "Notes~~“Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial ~~Statements" in this Quarterly Report,~~Statements” above, which information is incorporated by reference into this Item 1.

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

There have been no material changes from the risk factors previously disclosed in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December ~~25, 2019~~30, 2020 filed with the SEC on March ~~6, 2020 and our quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 25, 2020 filed with the SEC on May 1, 2020, except for the revision of the risk factor that immediately follows.~~

~~The resale of shares of common stock currently held by Trimaran Pollo Partners, L.L.C. could adversely affect the market price of our common stock.~~

Our largest stockholder, Trimaran Pollo Partners, L.L.C. (the “LLC”), holds 16,746,544 shares, or approximately 47.7%, of our outstanding common stock as of the date of this report. Members of the LLC include affiliates of Trimaran and Freeman Spogli. Pursuant to the terms of the LLC’s limited liability company operating agreement (the “LLC Agreement”), the LLC agreement can terminate, in which case the LLC will begin the process of dissolving and winding up its affairs, at the earlier of (i) the election of the managing member, or (ii) six years following the completion of our initial public offering, or July 27, 2020. We expect the process of winding up of the LLC and distribution of the Company’s shares to begin on or after July 27, 2020. If all or a substantial portion of these shares are resold into the public markets, or if it is perceived that they will be resold, the trading price of our common stock could decline.15, 2021.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

None.

Item 3. Defaults ofUpon Senior Securities.

None.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.

None.

Item 5. Other Information.

None.

5144

Table of Contents

Item 6. Exhibits.

Exhibit Index

Number

Description

Filed Herewith

Form

Period Ended

Exhibit

Filing Date

SEC File Number

Description

Filed Herewith

Form

Period Ended

Exhibit

Filing Date

SEC File Number

3.1

Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc.

10-Q

6/25/2014

3.1

9/5/2014

001-36556

Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc.

10-Q

6/25/2014

3.1

9/5/2014

001-36556

3.2

Amended and Restated By-Laws of El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc.

10-Q

6/25/2014

3.2

9/5/2014

001-36556

Amended and Restated By-Laws of El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc.

10-Q

6/25/2014

3.2

9/5/2014

001-36556

31.1

Certification of Principal Executive Officer under section 302 of the Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002

31.2

Certification of Principal Financial Officer under section 302 of the Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002

32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer under 18 U.S.C. section 1350, adopted by section 906 of the Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002

101.INS

Inline XBRL Instance Document - the instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document

101.SCH

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

101.CAL

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

101.DEF

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

101.LAB

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document

101.PRE

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

104

Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101)

Cover Page Interactive Data File - the cover page interactive data file does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL Document

Pursuant to Item 601(b)(32)(ii) of Regulation S-K (17 C.F.R. § 229.601(b)(32)(ii)), this certification is deemed furnished, not filed, for purposes of section 18 of the Exchange Act, nor is it otherwise subject to liability under that section. It will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except if the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.

5245

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

		El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc.
		(Registrant)

~~July 31, 2020~~Date: May 7, 2021		/s/ Bernard Acoca
~~Date~~		Bernard Acoca
		President and Chief Executive Officer
		(duly authorized officer)
~~July 31, 2020~~Date: May 7, 2021		/s/ Laurance Roberts
~~Date~~		Laurance Roberts
		Chief Financial Officer
		(principal financial officer)

5346


Franchise revenues:
2020	$	323
2021		491
2022		410
2023		395
2024		381
Thereafter		3,773
Total	$	5,773


	Twenty-Six Weeks Ended June 24, 2020								Twenty-Six Weeks Ended June 26, 2019
	Property			Equipment					Property			Equipment
	Leases			Leases			Total		Leases			Leases			Total
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities
Operating cash flows used for operating leases	$	9,269		$	619		$	9,888	$	12,361		$	654		$	13,015
Financing cash flows used for finance leases	$	16		$	—		$	16	$	53		$	—		$	53

Non-cash investing and financing activities:
Operating lease ROU assets obtained in exchange for lease liabilities:
Operating lease ROU assets	$	1,650		$	12		$	1,662		4,995			—			4,995
Derecognition of ROU assets due to terminations, impairment or modifications	$	(543)		$	(15)		$	(558)		—			—			—

Other Information
Weighted-average remaining lease term—finance leases		2.33			—					3.33			—
Weighted-average remaining lease term—operating leases		11.73			2.74					12.23			3.55
Weighted-average discount rate—finance leases		11.10	%		—					11.10	%		—
Weighted-average discount rate—operating leases		4.34	%		3.93	%				4.38	%		3.98	%