UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, DC 20549

 

FORM 10-Q

 

(Mark One)

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the quarterly period ended March 31,September 30, 2018

 

OR

 

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ________ to ________.

Commission File Number:1-10986

 

  

 

MISONIX, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

New York

(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or
organization)

11-2148932

(IRS Employer Identification No.)

  

1938 New Highway

Farmingdale, New York

(Address of principal executive offices)

11735

(Zip code)

 

(631) 694-9555

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes No

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes No

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company”company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

Large accelerated filerAccelerated filerNon-accelerated filerSmaller reporting company
Emerging growth company (Do not check if a smaller
reporting company)
 

 

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes No

 

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of the issuer’s common stock as of the latest practicable date: As of May 7,October 23, 2018 there were 9,404,8419,533,303 shares of the registrant’s common stock, $0.01 par value, outstanding.

 

 


MISONIX, INC.

 

 Page
PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements3
  
Item 1. Financial StatementsCondensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 30, 2018 (Unaudited) and June 30, 20183
  
Consolidated Balance Sheets at March 31, 2018 (Unaudited) and June 30, 20173
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three and Nine Months ended March 31,September 30, 2018 and 2017 (Unaudited)4
  
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Shareholders’ Equity for the NineThree Months ended March 31,September 30, 2018 (Unaudited)5
  
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the NineThree Months ended March 31,September 30, 2018 and 2017 (Unaudited)6
  
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)7
  
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations1720
  
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk23
  
Item 4. Controls and Procedures2324
  
PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
  
Item 1. Legal Proceedings25
  
Item 1A. Risk Factors26
  
Item 6. Exhibits26
  
Signatures27

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION

 

Item 1. Financial Statements

 

Misonix, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

 

  March 31,
2018
  June 30,
2017
 
   (unaudited)     
Assets        
Current assets:        
Cash and cash equivalents $12,309,631  $11,557,071 
Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $96,868 and $96,868, respectively  4,478,779   5,133,389 
Inventories, net  5,164,501   4,992,434 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  861,369   918,899 
Total current assets  22,814,280   22,601,793 
         
Property, plant and equipment, net of accumulated amortization and depreciation of $8,686,372 and $7,794,580, respectively  4,019,410   3,730,203 
Patents, net of accumulated amortization of $1,030,313 and $995,568, respectively  745,777   719,136 
Goodwill  1,701,094   1,701,094 
Intangible and other assets  433,393   282,876 
Deferred income tax     4,334,547 
Total assets $29,713,954  $33,369,649 
         
Liabilities and shareholders’ equity        
Current liabilities:        
Accounts payable $1,421,719  $1,861,228 
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities  2,744,134   3,346,138 
Total current liabilities  4,165,853   5,207,366 
         
Deferred lease liability  2,339   9,354 
Deferred income  18,601   13,087 
Total liabilities  4,186,793   5,229,807 
         
Commitments and contingencies        
         
Shareholders’ equity:        
Common stock, $.01 par value-shares authorized 20,000,000; 9,402,466 and 9,357,166 shares issued and outstanding, respectively  94,025   93,572 
Additional paid-in capital  39,117,601   36,808,810 
Accumulated deficit  (13,684,465)  (8,762,540)
Total shareholders’ equity  25,527,161   28,139,842 
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity $29,713,954  $33,369,649 

  September 30,  June 30, 
  2018  2018 
  (Unaudited)     
Assets        
Current assets:        
Cash and cash equivalents $9,322,811  $10,979,455 
Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $200,000 and $200,000, respectively  5,535,271   5,245,549 
Inventories, net  4,920,350   5,019,886 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  583,314   611,647 
Total current assets  20,361,746   21,856,537 
         
Property, plant and equipment, net of accumulated amortization and depreciation of $9,355,964 and $9,023,235, respectively  4,346,826   4,188,378 
Patents, net of accumulated amortization of $1,097,252 and $1,063,393, respectively  773,668   757,447 
Goodwill  1,701,094   1,701,094 
Contract assets  960,000    
Intangible and other assets  468,013   517,295 
Total assets $28,611,347  $29,020,751 
         
Liabilities and shareholders’ equity        
Current liabilities:        
Accounts payable $2,082,704  $1,794,098 
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities  2,344,903   2,812,172 
Total current liabilities  4,427,607   4,606,270 
         
Deferred income  13,303   13,303 
Total liabilities  4,440,910   4,619,573 
         
Commitments and contingencies        
         
Shareholders’ equity:        
Common stock, $.01 par value-shares authorized 40,000,000; 9,481,251 and 9,430,466 shares issued and outstanding in each period  94,822   94,305 
Additional paid-in capital  41,192,701   39,772,973 
Accumulated deficit  (17,117,086)  (15,466,100)
Total shareholders’ equity  24,170,437   24,401,178 
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity $28,611,347  $29,020,751 

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

3

Misonix, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
(Unaudited)

  For the three months ended 
  September 30, 
  2018  2017 
       
Revenues        
  Product $9,361,164  $7,280,723 
Total revenue  9,361,164   7,280,723 
         
Cost of goods sold  2,750,543   2,177,355 
Gross profit  6,610,621   5,103,368 
         
Operating expenses:        
 Selling expenses  4,735,005   3,570,713 
 General and administrative expenses  3,183,384   2,573,131 
 Research and development expenses  1,304,766   901,274 
Total operating expenses  9,223,155   7,045,118 
Loss from operations  (2,612,534)  (1,941,750)
         
Other income (expense):        
 Interest income  19,813   13 
 Royalty income  —     452,971 
 Other  (18,265)  (4,458)
Total other income  1,548   448,526 
         
Loss from operations before income taxes  (2,610,986)  (1,493,224)
         
Income tax (benefit)  —     (281,000)
Net loss $(2,610,986) $(1,212,224)
         
Net loss per share:        
  Basic $(0.29) $(0.14)
  Diluted $(0.29) $(0.14)
         
Weighted average shares - Basic  9,100,123   8,958,405 
Weighted average shares - Diluted  9,100,123   8,958,405 

 

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


Misonix, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated StatementsStatement of OperationsShareholders’ Equity
(Unaudited)

 

  For the three months ended
March 31,
  

For the nine months ended

March 31,

 
  2018  2017  2018  2017 
             
Revenues                
Product $8,429,132  $7,177,763  $24,033,700  $19,379,768 
License  4,010,000      4,010,000    
Total revenue  12,439,132   7,177,763   28,043,700   19,379,768 
Cost of goods sold, exclusive of depreciation from consigned product  2,631,893   2,112,099   7,275,073   5,842,778 
Gross profit  9,807,239   5,065,664   20,768,627   13,536,990 
Operating expenses:                
Selling expenses  4,447,421   3,587,859   11,937,649   10,184,680 
General and administrative expenses  1,925,086   2,484,962   6,879,077   6,504,202 
Research and development expenses  1,199,895   465,863   3,058,374   1,398,311 
Total operating expenses  7,572,402   6,538,684   21,875,100   18,087,193 
Income (loss) from operations  2,234,837   (1,473,020)  (1,106,473)  (4,550,203)
Other income (expense):                
Interest income  9,074   18   9,131   56 
Royalty income  916   953,235   525,438   2,846,351 
Other  (5,712)  (6,940)  (15,474)  (15,576)
Total other income  4,278   946,313   519,095   2,830,831 
Income (loss) from operations before income taxes  2,239,115   (526,707)  (587,378)  (1,719,372)
Income tax expense (benefit)     (219,000)  5,243,422   (275,000)
Net income (loss) from continuing operations  2,239,115   (307,707)  (5,830,800)  (1,444,372)
Discontinued operations:                
Income from discontinued operations net of tax expense of $0 and $88,139     161,861      161,861 
Net income from discontinued operations     161,861      161,861 
                 
Net income (loss) $2,239,115  $(145,846) $(5,830,800) $(1,282,511)
                 
Net income (loss) per share:                
Continuing operations:                
Basic $0.24  $(0.04) $(0.65) $(0.18)
Diluted $0.23  $(0.04) $(0.65) $(0.18)
Discontinued operations:                
Basic $  $0.02  $  $0.02 
Diluted $  $0.02  $  $0.02 
Combined                
Basic $0.24  $(0.02) $(0.65) $(0.16)
Diluted $0.23  $(0.02) $(0.65) $(0.16)
                 
Weighted average shares - Basic  9,028,506   8,613,354   8,999,938   8,263,343 
Weighted average shares - Diluted  9,549,144   8,613,354   8,999,938   8,263,343 

  Common Stock,                
  $.01 Par Value  Treasury Stock  Additional     Total 
  Number     Number     paid-in  Accumulated  shareholders’ 
  of shares  Amount  of shares  Amount  capital  deficit  equity 
Balance, June 30, 2018  9,430,466  $94,305     $  $39,772,973  $(15,466,100) $24,401,178 
Cumulative effect of the adoption of ASC 606 - revenue recognition                     $960,000   960,000 
Net loss                 (2,610,986)  (2,610,986)
Proceeds from exercise of stock options  51,660   517         415,230       415,747 
Stock-based compensation              1,004,498      1,004,498 
Balance, September 30, 2018  9,482,126  $94,822     $  $41,192,701  $(17,117,086) $24,170,437 

 

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


Misonix, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated StatementStatements of Shareholders’ EquityCash Flows
(Unaudited)

 

  Common Stock,
$.01 Par Value
  Additional     Total 
  Number
of shares
  Amount  paid-in
capital
  Accumulated
deficit
  shareholders’
equity
 
Balance, June 30, 2017  9,357,166  $93,572  $36,808,810  $(8,762,540) $28,139,842 
Implementation of new accounting standard              908,875   908,875 
Net loss              (5,830,800)  (5,830,800)
Proceeds from exercise of stock options  45,300   453   227,770       228,223 
Stock-based compensation          2,081,021       2,081,021 
Balance, March 31, 2018  9,402,466  $94,025  $39,117,601  $(13,684,465) $25,527,161 

  For the three months ended 
  September 30, 
  2018  2017 
Operating activities        
Net loss $(2,610,986) $(1,212,224)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:        
  Depreciation and amortization  366,588   326,420 
  Disposals of property, plant and equipment  —     112,704 
  Deferred income tax (benefit)  —     (281,000)
  Stock-based compensation  1,004,498   625,293 
  Deferred income  —     (6,436)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:        
  Accounts receivable  (289,722)  979,878 
  Inventories  (104,135)  (649,440)
  Prepaid expenses and other current assets  28,333   416,438 
  Intangible, contract and other assets  49,282   —   
  Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other current liabilities  (178,663)  (1,285,333)
Net cash used in operating activities  (1,734,805)  (973,700)
         
Investing activities        
Acquisition of property, plant and equipment  (287,506)  (85,129)
Additional patents  (50,080)  (26,403)
Net cash used in investing activities  (337,586)  (111,532)
         
Financing activities        
Proceeds from exercise of stock options  415,747   56,202 
Net cash provided by financing activities  415,747   56,202 
         
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents  (1,656,644)  (1,029,030)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period  10,979,455   11,557,071 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $9,322,811  $10,528,041 
         
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:        
Cash paid for:        
Income taxes $7,678  $—   
Transfer of inventory to property, plant and equipment for consignment of product $203,671  $435,849 

 

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


Misonix, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)

  For the nine months ended
March 31,
 
  2018  2017 
Operating activities        
Net loss $(5,830,800) $(1,282,511)
Net (income) from discontinued operations     (161,861)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:        
Depreciation and amortization and other non-cash items  1,046,511   763,434 
Disposals of property, plant and equipment  138,972    
Deferred income tax expense / (benefit)  5,243,422   (186,861)
Stock-based compensation  2,081,021   616,206 
Deferred lease liability  (7,015)  69 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:        
Accounts receivable  654,610   (487,729)
Inventories  (1,194,747)  (449,986)
Prepaid expenses and other assets  (92,987)  (167,423)
Deferred income  5,514   (13,948)
Accounts payable, accrued expenses  (1,041,513)  137,861 
Net cash provided by (used in) continuing operating activities  1,002,988   (1,232,749)
         
Investing activities        
Acquisition of property, plant and equipment  (358,013)  (239,627)
Acquisition of patents  (120,638)  (185,756)
Net cash used in investing continuing activities  (478,651)  (425,383)
Net cash provided by investing activities - discontinued operations      161,861 
Net cash used in investing activities  (478,651)  (263,522)
         
Financing activities        
Proceeds from exercise of stock options  228,223   303,447 
Proceeds from the sale of common stock     4,000,000 
Net cash provided by continuing financing activities  228,223   4,303,447 
         
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents  752,560   2,807,176 
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period  11,557,071   9,049,327 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $12,309,631  $11,856,503 
         
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:        
Cash paid for:        
Income taxes $895  $9,866 
         
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash information:        
Transfer of inventory to property, plant and equipment $1,022,680  $1,363,506 
Adoption of new accounting standard on deferred taxes $908,875  $ 

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


Misonix, Inc. and Subsidiaries 

Notes toCondensed Consolidated Financial Statements

For the Three and Nine Months Ended March 31,September 30, 2018 and 2017 (unaudited)

 

1. Basis of Presentation, Organization and Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

 

Basis of Presentation

 

These condensed consolidated financial statements of Misonix, Inc. (“Misonix” or the “Company”) include the accounts of Misonix and its 100% owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.

 

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, these financial statements do not include all the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. As such, they should be read with reference to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017,2018, which provides a more complete explanation of the Company’s accounting policies, financial position, operating results, business properties and other matters. In the opinion of management, these financial statements reflect all adjustments considered necessary for a fair statement of interim results.

 

Organization and Business

 

Misonix designs, manufactures develops and markets minimally invasive therapeutic ultrasonic medical devices. These products are used for precise bone sculpting, removal of soft and hard tumors, and tissue debridement, primarily in the fieldsareas of neurosurgery, orthopedic surgery, plastic surgery, neurosurgery, podiatrywound care and vascularmaxillo-facial surgery. In the United States, the Company sells itsour products are marketed primarily through a network of commissioned agents assistedhybrid sales approach. This includes direct sales representatives, managed by Company personnel.regional sales managers, along with independent distributors. Outside of the United States, the Company sellswe sell BoneScalpel and SonaStar to specialty distributors who thenpurchase products from us to resell to their clinical customer bases. We sell to all major markets in the products to hospitals.Americas, Europe, Middle East, Asia Pacific and Africa. The Company operates as one business segment.

 

High Intensity Focused Ultrasound Technology

 

The Company sold its rights to the high intensity focused ultrasound technology to SonaCare Medical, LLC (“SonaCare”) in May 2010. The Company may receive up to approximately $5.8 million in payment for the sale. SonaCare will pay the Company 7% of the gross revenues received from its sales of the (i) prostate product in Europe and (ii) kidney and liver products worldwide, until the Company has received payments of $3 million, and thereafter 5% of the gross revenues, up to an aggregate payment of $5.8 million, all subject to a minimum annual royalty of $250,000. PaymentsNo payments were received for the three and nine months ended March 31,September 30, 2018 and 2017 were $0 and $250,000, respectively.2017. Cumulative royalties through March 31,September 30, 2018 were $2,292,579.$2,542,579.

 

Major Customers and Concentration of Credit Risk

Included in revenues are sales to the Company distributor of Bone Scalpel in China of approximately $1,500,000 and $0, for the three months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Accounts receivable from this customer were $10,000 and $0 at September 30, 2018 and June 30, 2018, respectively.

 

Total royalties from Medtronic Minimally Invasive Therapies (“MMIT”) related to their sales of the Company’s ultrasonic cutting and sculpting products, which use high frequency sound waves to coagulate and divide tissue for both open and laparoscopic surgery, were $524,000$0 and $1,885,788$453,000 for the ninethree months ended March 31,September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Accounts receivable from MMIT royalties were $0 at March 31,September 30, 2018 and $925,000$0 at June 30, 2017.2018. The license agreement with MMIT expired in August 2017.

 


At March 31,September 30, 2018 and June 30, 2017,2018, the Company’s accounts receivable with customers outside the United StatesSates were approximately $522,000$1,689,000 and $860,000,$1,630,000, respectively, none$370,000 of which is over 90 days.

7

Use of Estimatesdays at September 30, 2018.

 

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Significant estimates and assumptions are used for but not limited to establishing the allowance for doubtful accounts, valuation of inventory, depreciation, asset impairment evaluations and establishing deferred tax assets and related valuation allowances, and stock-based compensation. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Earnings Per Share

 

Earnings per share (“EPS”) is calculated using the two class method, which allocates earnings among common stock and participating securities to calculate EPS when an entity’s capital structure includes either two or more classes of common stock or common stock and participating securities. Unvested share-based payment awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are participating securities. As such, unvested restricted stock of the Company are considered participating securities. The dilutive effect of options and their equivalents (including non-vested stock issued under stock based compensation plans), is computed using the “treasury” method.

 

Basic income per common share is based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted income per common share includes the dilutive effect of potential common shares outstanding. The following table sets forth the reconciliation of weighted average shares outstanding and diluted weighted average shares outstanding:

 

  For the three months ended  For the nine months ended 
  March  31,  March  31, 
  2018  2017  2018  2017 
             
Basic weighted average shares outstanding  9,028,506   8,613,354   8,999,938   8,263,343 
Dilutive effect of restricted stock awards (participating securities)  373,200          
                 
Denominator for basic earnings per share  9,374,906   8,613,354   8,999,938   8,263,343 
                 
Dilutive effect of stock options  174,238          
                 
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding  9,549,144   8,613,354   8,999,938   8,263,343 

  For the three months ended 
  September 30, 
  2018  2017 
       
Basic weighted average shares outstanding  9,100,123   8,958,405 
Dilutive effect of resticted stock awards (participating securities)      
         
Denominator for basic earnings per share  9,100,123   8,958,405 
         
Dilutive effect of stock options      
         
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding  9,100,123   8,958,405 

 

Diluted EPS for the ninethree months ended March 31,September 30, 2018 and for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2017 as presented is the same as basic EPS as the inclusion of the effect of common share equivalents then outstanding would be anti-dilutive. Accordingly, excluded from the calculation of diluted EPS are the dilutive effect of 586,824options to purchase 632,301 and 668,751 shares of common stock options for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and the dilutive effect of 194,925 and 482,093 stock options for the nine months ended March 31,September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Also excluded from the calculation of earnings per share for the ninethree months ended March 31,September 30, 2018 and for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2017 are the 400,000unvested restricted stock awards which were issued in December 2016.

 


Recent Accounting Pronouncements

 

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued guidance onASC Update No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), which was subsequently updated. The purpose of the updated standard is to provide enhancements to the quality and consistency of revenue from contracts with customers.recognition between companies using U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards. The underlyingnew five-step recognition model introduces the core principle is that an entity will recognizeof recognizing revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers atin an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled to in exchange for thosethe promised goods or services. The guidance provides a five-step analysis of transactionsservices, which includes additional footnote disclosures to determine when and how revenue is recognized. Other major provisions include capitalization of certain contract costs, consideration of time value of money in the transaction price, and allowing estimates of variable consideration to be recognized before contingencies are resolved, in certain circumstances. The guidance also requires enhanced disclosures regardingdescribe the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue, certain costs and cash flowsflow arising from an entity’s contractscustomers.

As amended, ASU 2014-09 requires the Company to use either of the following transition methods: (i) a full retrospective approach reflecting the application of the standard in each prior reporting period with customers. This guidance permits the use of eitheroption to elect certain practical expedients; or (ii) a modified retrospective approach with the retrospective or cumulative effect transition method and isof initially adopting ASU 2014-09 recognized at the date of adoption. This standard became effective for the Company beginning in fiscal 2019; early adoption is permitted beginning in 2018. We have not yet selected a transition methodon July 1, 2018 and are currently evaluating the impact ofCompany adopted the guidance onnew pronouncement under the Company’s financial condition, results of operations and related disclosures. The FASB has also issued the following additional guidance clarifying certain issues on revenue from contracts with customers: Revenue from Contracts with Customers - Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients and Revenue from Contracts with Customers - Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing. The Company has engaged a consulting firm to assist with in evaluating this guidance to determine the impact it will have on its financial statements, and expects to complete its evaluation and implementation of necessary procedures and changes, if any, prior to June 30, 2018.modified retrospective approach.

 


In February 2016, the FASB issued guidance on lease accounting requiring lessees to recognize a right-of-use asset and a lease liability for long-term leases. The liability will be equal to the present value of lease payments. This guidance must be applied using a modified retrospective transition approach to all annual and interim periods presented and is effective for the Company beginning in fiscal 2020. The Company is currently in the early stages of evaluating this guidance to determine the impact it will have on its consolidated financial statements.

 

In August 2016, the FASB issued guidance on the Statement of Cash Flows Classification of certain cash receipts and cash payments (a consensus of the Emerging Issues Task Force). This guidance addresses the following eight specific cash flow issues: Debt prepayment or debt extinguishment costs; settlement of zero-coupon debt instruments or other debt instruments with coupon interest rates that are insignificant in relation to the effective interest rate of the borrowing; contingent consideration payments made after a business combination; proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims; proceeds from the settlement of corporate-owned life insurance policies (including bank-owned life insurance policies); distributions received from equity method investees; beneficial interests in securitization transactions; and separately identifiable cash flows and application of the predominance principle. This guidance will bebecame effective for the Company beginning in fiscal 2019. As this guidance only affects the classification within the statement of cash flows, ASU 2016-15 isdid not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

 

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-01,Business Combinations: Clarifying the Definition of a Business (“ASU 2017-01”). ASU 2017-01 clarifies the definition of a business for determining whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. ASU 2017-01 is effective for annual periods and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and early adoption is permitted. The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact of the adoption of ASU 2017-01 did not have a material effect on itsthe Company’s consolidated financial statements.

 

There are no other recently issued accounting pronouncements that are expected to have a material effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

 

Recently AdoptedCritical Accounting PronouncementsPolicies and Use of Estimates

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Significant estimates and assumptions are used for but not limited to establishing the allowance for doubtful accounts, valuation of inventory, depreciation, asset impairment evaluations and establishing deferred tax assets and related valuation allowances, and stock-based compensation. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

2. Revenue Recognition

On July 1, 2018 the Company adopted Topic 606 using the modified retrospective method applied to those contracts which were not completed as of the adoption date. The reported results for the quarter ended September 30, 2018 reflect the application of Topic 606 guidance while the reported results for fiscal year 2018 were prepared under the guidance of Topic 605, “Revenue Recognition”. The adoption of Topic 606 resulted in a cumulative prior period adjustment in the amount of $960,000 related to the Company’s License and Exclusive Manufacturing Agreement described below, but the remainder of the adoption did not have a material impact on the timing or amount of revenue recognized.


The impacts of adopting ASC Topic 606 on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets as of July 1, 2018 were as follows:

        As 
        Adjusted 
  As  ASC 606  Under 
  Reported  Adjustments  ASC 606 
          
Long-term contract assets $  $960,000  $960,000 
             
Total Shareholders’ equity $24,401,178  $960,000  $25,361,178 

The Company has made the following accounting policy elections and elected to use certain practical expedients, as permitted by the FASB, in applying Topic 606: 1) the Company accounts for amounts collected from customers for sales and other taxes net of related amounts remitted to tax authorities; 2) the Company expenses costs to obtain a contract as they are incurred if the expected period of benefit, and therefore the amortization period, is one year or less; 3) the Company accounts for shipping and handling activities that occur after control transfers to the customer as a fulfillment cost rather than an additional promised service and these fulfillment costs fall within selling, general and administrative expenses; 4) the Company does not assess whether promised goods or services are performance obligations if they are immaterial in the context of the contract with the customer; 5) the Company will utilize the right-to-invoice practical expedient with regard to the recognition of revenue upon the purchase of consumable goods in connection with a product placement/consignment arrangement.

The Company determines revenue recognition through the following steps:

Identification of the contract, or contracts, with a customer

Identification of the performance obligations in the contract

Determination of the transaction price

Allocation of the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract

Recognition of revenue when, or as, a performance obligation is satisfied

Contracts and Performance Obligations

The Company accounts for a contract with a customer when there is an approval and commitment from both parties, the rights of the parties are identified, payment terms are identified, the contract has commercial substance and collectability of the consideration is probable. The Company’s performance obligations consist mainly of transferring control of products and related services identified in the contracts, purchase orders or invoices. For each contract, the Company considers the obligation to transfer products or bundled products and services to the customer, of which each is distinct in the context of the contract, to be performance obligations. The Company historically has not made provisions for returns and allowances as they have not been material to the operations of the Company.

Transaction Price and Allocation to Performance Obligations

Transaction prices of products are typically based upon contracted rates as specified on the purchase order for the purchase of consumables which represents the standalone selling price as determined through the sale of products and or bundled products or services separately in similar circumstances to similar customers. The Company determines the effects of variable consideration, inclusive of any constraints, in determining the transaction price with regard to their contracts with customers.

Recognition of Revenue

The Company satisfies performance obligations over time, or at a point in time, upon which control transfers to the customer.


Revenue derived from the shipping and billing of product is recorded upon shipment, when transfer of control for products shipped F.O.B. shipping point. Products shipped F.O.B. destination point are recorded as revenue when received at the point of destination when the transfer of control is completed. Shipments under agreements with distributors are not subject to return, and payment for these shipments in not contingent on sales by the distributor. Accordingly, the Company recognizes revenue on shipments to distributors in the same manner as with other customers under the ship and bill process.

Revenue derived from the rental of equipment is recorded on a monthly basis over the term of the lease. Shipments of consumable products to these rental customers is recorded as orders are received and shipments are made F.O.B. destination or F.O.B. shipping point.

Revenue derived from consignment agreements is earned as consumables product orders are fulfilled. Therefore, revenue is recognized as shipments are made F.O B shipping point or F.O.B destination.

Revenue derived from service and maintenance contracts is recognized evenly over the life of the service agreement as the services are performed.

Contract Specific Performance Obligations and Significant Judgements

 

In March 2016,Product Placement/Consignment Agreements

The Company’s product placement/consignment agreements include the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-09 “Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvementsplacement of a generator at the customer’s place of business and pricing related to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting” intended to simplify several aspectsthe purchase of accountingconsumables for share-based payment transactions.use in conjunction with the generator. These agreements have no stated minimum consumable purchase quantities nor a stated term. The Company adoptedconsiders the transaction price in these amendmentsarrangements to be fully constrained variable consideration because it is dependent on future sales of consumables to the customer. The Company has determined that the pattern of purchase of consumables by a customer is consistent with the benefit received by the customer for the use of the generator and therefore the Company has a right to consideration based upon the pattern of consumable purchases placed through purchase orders by the customer. The Company’s invoices to these customers have short-term payment terms and are aligned with the transfer of goods and services to the customer and the Company recognizes revenue based upon their right to invoice customers.

License and Manufacturing Agreement

On October 19, 2017, the Company entered into a License and Exclusive Manufacturing Agreement (the “Agreement”) with Hunan Xing Hang Rui Kang Bio-technologies Co., Ltd, a Chinese corporation (the “Licensee”) under which Misonix has licensed certain manufacturing and distribution rights to its SonaStar product line in China, Hong Kong and Macau in exchange for payments consisting of initial payments totaling $5,000,000 for the transfer of functional intellectual property and initial stocking orders of product, and minimum royalty payments of $2,000,000 per calendar year for three years beginning in 2019, based upon the firstmanufacture of products by the Licensee. $5,000,000 of initial revenue was collected and recorded for the quarter ended March 31, 2018 under ASC 605. Upon the adoption of fiscal 2018.Topic 606, the Company evaluated this contract under the provisions of the new revenue standard. The guidance requiresCompany determined that all excess tax benefitsthe satisfied performance obligations and tax deficiencies previouslyallocation of the transaction price related to the $5,000,000 received prior to adoption was consistent with the provisions of ASC 606 and also recorded as additional paid-in capital be prospectively recorded in income tax expense. The guidance allows for an increasea transitional adjustment to accumulated deficit in the threshold for net share settlement upamount of $960,000 as follows:

Minimum royalty revenue provided by the contract $6,000,000 
     
Implicit price concession  (5,040,000)
     
Adoption adjustment to accumulated deficit under ASC 606 $960,000 


Although the contract includes minimum royalties, the Company concluded that a significant portion of those guaranteed minimums are actually variable consideration subject to the maximum statutory rateconstraint because the Company has provided an implicit price concession. Specifically, the fact that production of the product in employees’ applicable jurisdictions without triggering liability classification. China is not assured and the Licensee must develop a manufacturing process, coupled with the fact that new technology related to this product is expected to be available for sale domestically, may result in the Licensee not earning sufficient revenue in order to pay the minimum royalties. Therefore, the Company has determined variable consideration through utilization of the most likely method based upon forecasts and projections of shipment of products.

The adoptionCompany will monitor facts and circumstances over time and adjust management’s most likely estimate of this guidance hadvariable consideration on a quarterly basis.

Disaggregation of Revenue

The Company generates revenue from the sale and leasing of medical equipment and from the sale of consumable products used with such equipment in surgical procedures as well as through product licensing arrangements. In the United States, the Company’s products are marketed primarily through a hybrid sales approach which includes direct sales representatives, managed by regional sales managers, along with independent distributors. Outside the United States, the Company sells BoneScalpel and SonaStar to specialty distributors who purchase products to resell to their clinical customer bases. The Company sells to all major markets in the Americas, Europe, Middle East, Asia Pacific, and Africa. Revenue is disaggregated from contracts between products under ship and bill arrangements and licensing agreements, and by geography, which the Company believes best depicts how the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenues and cash flows are affected by economic factors. The Company also provides an immaterial impact on income taxesamount of service revenue which is recognized over time, but not stated separately because the amounts are immaterial.

The following table disaggregates the Company’s product revenue by classification and location:

   For the three months ended 
   September 30, 
   2018  2017 
Total       
Consumables  $6,339,108  $5,379,589 
Equipment   3,022,056   1,901,134 
Total  $9,361,164  $7,280,723 
          
Domestic:         
Consumables  $4,825,599  $4,134,918 
Equipment   578,919   592,424 
Total  $5,404,518  $4,727,342 
          
International:         
Consumables  $1,513,509  $1,244,671 
Equipment   2,443,137   1,308,710 
Total  $3,956,646  $2,553,381 

There was no license revenue for the periods presented.

The following table disaggregates the Company’s revenue by geographic location:

  Three months ended 
  September 30, 
  2018  2017 
       
United States $5,404,518  $4,727,342 
International  3,956,646   2,553,381 
Total Product Revenue $9,361,164  $7,280,723 


Contract Assets

The timing of revenue recognition, customer invoicing, and collections produces accounts receivable and contract assets on the Company’s Consolidated Statementconsolidated balance sheet. Contract liabilities are not material to the operations of Operations for the three and nine months ended March 31,Company as of September 30, 2018. The Company elected to applyinvoices in accordance with contract payment terms. Customer invoices represent an unconditional right of consideration. When revenue is recognized in advance of customer invoicing a contract asset is recorded. Unpaid customer invoices are reflected as accounts receivable.

The contract asset represents an asset in conjunction with the presentation requirement for cash flowsCompany’s License and Manufacturing Agreement related to excess tax benefits prospectively, which had an immaterial impact on both net cash from operating activities and net cash usedthe most likely variable consideration associated with the royalty provisions in financing activities for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2018.contract. The presentation requirements for cash flows related to employee taxes paid for withheld shares had no impact on any of the periods presented on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows since such cash flows have historically been presentedasset is recorded as a financing activity. Finally,long-term asset as the Company believes that payment will be made on this asset in a duration to exceed one year.

Selling Costs

Incremental direct costs of obtaining a contract primarily include sales commissions paid to sales personnel and outside sales representatives in connection with sales of products under ship and bill scenarios or through product placement scenarios. The expected period of benefit of these costs is one year or less and therefore the Company has elected the practical expedient to account for forfeitures asexpense such costs in the period in which they occur, rather than estimate expected forfeitures. As a result,are incurred. Typically, these costs represent shipping and handling costs and the Company recorded the cumulative impact of $908,875accounts for these costs as fulfillment costs and are expensed as incurred. Costs in fulfilling a contract are only capitalized as an increaseasset if they relate directly to Deferred Income Taxes with a corresponding decreasean existing contract or specific anticipated contract, they generate or enhance resources of the entity that will be used to Accumulated Deficit.satisfy performance obligations in the future, and they are expected to be recovered. The Company has not identified any such costs.

 


2.3. Fair Value of Financial Instruments

 

We followThe Company follows a three-level fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to measure fair value. This hierarchy requires entities to maximize the use of “observable inputs” and minimize the use of “unobservable inputs.” The three levels of inputs used to measure fair value are as follows:

 

Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets as of the measurement date.

 

Level 2: Significant other observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.

 

Level 3: Significant unobservable inputs that reflect assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability.

 

At March 31,September 30, 2018 and June 30, 2017,2018, all of ourthe Company’s cash and cash equivalents, trade accounts receivable and trade accounts payable were short term in nature, and their carrying amounts approximate fair value.

 


3.4. Inventories

 

Inventories are summarized as follows:

 

  March 31,  June 30, 
  2018  2017 
Raw material $2,581,360  $2,409,148 
Work-in-process  932,563   741,994 
Finished goods  2,136,968   3,267,232 
   5,650,891   6,418,374 
Less valuation reserve  486,390   1,425,940 
  $5,164,501  $4,992,434 

  September 30,  June 30, 
  2018  2018 
Raw material $3,057,058  $3,540,205 
Work-in-process  186,186   180,442 
Finished goods  2,121,364   1,743,497 
   5,364,608   5,464,144 
Less valuation reserve  (444,258)  (444,258)
  $4,920,350  $5,019,886 

 

4.5. Property, Plant and Equipment

 

Depreciation and amortization of property, plant and equipment was $952,514$333,000 and $682,832$296,000 for the ninethree months ended March 31,September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Inventory items included in property, plant and equipment are depreciated using the straight line method over estimated useful lives of 3 to 5 years. Depreciation of generators which are consigned to customers is expensed over a 5 year period, and depreciation is charged to selling expenses.

 

5.6. Goodwill

 

Goodwill is not amortized. We reviewThe Company reviews goodwill for impairment annually and whenever events or changes indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable. These events or circumstances could include a significant change in the business climate, legal factors, operating performance indicators, competition, or sale or disposition of significant assets or products. Application of these impairment tests requires significant judgments, including estimation of cash flows, which is dependent on internal forecasts, estimation of the long term rate of growth for the Company’s business, the useful lives over which cash flows will occur and determination of the Company’s weighted average cost of capital. The Company primarily utilizes the Company’s market capitalization and a discounted cash flow model in determining the fair value which consists of Level 3 inputs. Changes in the projected cash flows and discount rate estimates and assumptions underlying the valuation of goodwill could materially affect the determination of fair value at acquisition or during subsequent periods when tested for impairment. The Company completed its annual goodwill impairment tests for fiscal 20172018 and 20162017 as of June 30 of each year. There were no triggering events identified during the quarter ended March 31,September 30, 2018.

 


6.7. Patents

 

The costs of acquiring or processing patents are capitalized at cost. These amounts are being amortized using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the underlying assets, which is approximately 17 years. Patents, net of accumulated amortization, totaled $745,777$773,668 and $719,136$757,447 at March 31,September 30, 2018 and June 30, 2017,2018, respectively. Amortization expense for the ninethree months ended March 31,September 30, 2018 and 2017 was $93,997$34,000 and $81,000,$30,000, respectively. The following is a schedule of estimated future patent amortization expenses by fiscal year as of March 31,September 30, 2018:

 

2018  $32,202 
2019   119,318   $96,335 
2020   94,839   $106,103 
2021   88,668   $99,932 
2022   58,368   $67,385 
Thereafter   352,382 
  $745,777 
2023  $66,315 

 


7.8. Accrued Expenses and Other Current Liabilities

 

The following summarizes accrued expenses and other current liabilities:

 

  March 31,  June 30, 
  2018  2017 
       
Accrued vacation $273,285  $715,245 
Accrued bonus  435,678   343,400 
Accrued commissions  702,913   751,000 
Professional fees  101,051   662,537 
Litigation settlement     500,000 
Deferred income  18,601   27,901 
Customer prepayments  456,591   201,218 
Other accrued expenses  756,015   144,837 
         
  $2,744,134  $3,346,138 
  September 30,  June 30, 
  2018  2018 
       
Accrued payroll, payroll taxes and vacation $633,656  $351,435 
Accrued bonus  170,596   552,988 
Accrued commissions  484,226   742,807 
Professional fees  36,000   102,065 
Deferred foreign taxes  401,000   401,000 
Vendor, tax and other accruals  619,425   661,877 
         
  $2,344,903  $2,812,172 

 

8.9. Stock-Based Compensation Plans

 

Stock Option Awards

 

For the ninethree months ended March 31,September 30, 2018 and 2017, the compensation cost relating to stock option awards that has been charged against income for the Company’s stock option plans was $1,405,152$278,121 and $532,341 respectively, which included a charge to modify certain stock options of $81,765 and a reversal of stock compensation from prior periods due to forfeitures of unvested options of $616,239, for the nine months ended March 31, 2017.$398,359 respectively. As of March 31,September 30, 2018, there was approximately $2,703,462$2,996,027 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested share-based compensation arrangements to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.62.7 years.

 

Stock options typically expire 10 years from the date of grant and vest over service periods, which typically are 4 years. All options are granted at fair market value, as defined in the applicable plans.


The fair value of each option award was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option valuation model that uses the assumptions noted in the following table. The expected volatility represents the historical price changes of the Company’s stock over a period equal to that of the expected term of the option. The Company uses the simplified method for determining the option term. The risk-free rate was based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant. The expected dividend yield is based upon historical and projected dividends. The Company has historically not paid dividends, and is not expected to do so in the near term.

 

The weighted average fair value per share at date of grant for options granted during the ninethree months ended March 31,September 30, 2018 was $5.50.$8.62. There were options to purchase 305,500137,000 and 327,500172,500 shares granted during the ninethree months ended March 31,September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The fair value was estimated based on the weighted average assumptions of:

 

 For three months ended 
 For nine months ended March 31,  September 30, 2018 
 2018  2017  2018 2017 
Risk-free interest rates  1.98%  1.80%  2.87%  1.86%
Expected option life in years  5.95   6.25   6.25   5.72 
Expected stock price volatility  57.42%  54.68%  55.39%  59.52%
Expected dividend yield  0%  0%  0%  0%

 


A summary of option activity under the Company’s equity plans as of March 31,September 30, 2018, and changes during the ninethree months ended March 31,September 30, 2018 is presented below:

 

 Outstanding Shares 

Average
Exercise

Price

 

Aggregate

Intrinsic Value

  Outstanding
Shares
 Average
Exercise
Price
 Aggregate
Intrinsic Value
 
Outstanding at June 30, 2017  1,191,236  $7.66  $2,748,956 
Outstanding at June 30, 2018  1,330,193  $8.47  $5,369,557 
Granted  305,500  $10.10       137,000   15.55     
Exercised  (45,300) $5.04       (51,660)  8.05     
Forfeited  (13,000) $7.67       (55,627)  9.16     
Expired  (75,000) $4.87       (15,000)  2.66     
Outstanding as of March 31, 2018  1,363,436  $8.45  $2,738,327 
Vested and exercisable at March 31, 2018  692,434  $7.50  $2,083,907 
Outstanding as of September 30, 2018  1,344,906  $9.31  $12,364,220 
Vested and exercisable at September 30, 2018  710,280  $8.04  $7,428,351 

 

The total fair value of stock options vested during the ninethree months ended March 31,September 30, 2018 was $1,418,743.$526,729. The number and weighted-average grant-date fair value of non-vested stock options at the beginning of fiscal 2018 was 673,875648,877 and $4.77,$5.08, respectively. The number and weighted-average grant-date fair value of stock options which vested during the ninethree months ended March 31,September 30, 2018 was 299,37395,624 and $4.74,$5.51, respectively.

 

Restricted Stock Awards

 

On December 15, 2016, the Company issued 400,000 shares of restricted stock to its Chief Executive Officer. These awards vest over a period of up to five years, subject to meeting certain service, performance and market conditions. These awards were valued at approximately $3.6 million and compensationmillion. Compensation expense recorded in the ninethree months ended March 31,September 30, 2018 and 2017 related to these awards was $675,869.$726,377 and $226,934 respectively. As of March 31,September 30, 2018, there was approximately $2,473,117$1,552,272 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested restricted stock awards to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 3.13.06 years. The awards contain a combination of vesting terms which include time vesting, performance vesting relating to revenue achievement, and market vesting related to obtaining certain levels of Company stock prices. At September 30, 2018, the Company has estimated that it is probable that the performance conditions will be met. The awards were valued using a Monte Carlo valuation model using a stock price at the date of grant of $9.60, a term of 3 to 5 years, a risk free interest rate of 1.6% to 2.1% and a volatility factor of 66.5%. As of March 31,September 30, 2018, 26,800186,600 shares from this set of awards have vested.

 

During the three months ended September 30, 2018, the performance conditions of one of these restricted stock awards were met, resulting in the full amortization of this award during the quarter. The number of restricted stock awards which vested was 133,333 and the related compensation expense during the quarter was $573,686.

9.10. Commitments and Contingencies

 

Leases


The Company has entered into several non-cancellable operating leases for the rental of certain manufacturing and office space, equipment and automobiles expiring in various years through 2021. The principal building lease provides for a monthly rental of approximately $26,000. The Company also leases certain office equipment and automobiles under operating leases expiring through March 2019.

Class Action Securities Litigation

On September 19, 2016, Richard Scalfani, an individual shareholder of Misonix, filed a lawsuit against the Company and its former CEO and CFO in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York, alleging violations of the federal securities laws. The complaint alleges that the Company’s stock price was artificially inflated between November 5, 2015 and September 14, 2016 as a result of alleged false and misleading statements in the Company’s securities filings concerning the Company’s business, operations, and prospects and the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Scalfani filed the action seeking to represent a putative class of all persons (other than defendants, officers and directors of the Company, and their affiliates) who purchased publicly traded Misonix securities between November 5, 2015 and September 14, 2016. Scalfani was seeking an unspecified amount of damages for himself and for the putative class under the federal securities laws. On March 24, 2017, the Court appointed Scalfani and another individual Misonix shareholder, Tracey Angiuoli, as lead plaintiffs for purposes of pursuing the action on behalf of the putative class. The lead plaintiffs, on behalf of the putative class, and the Company reached a settlement in principle under which the Company would pay $500,000 to resolve the matter. The district court approved the settlement and dismissed the lawsuit with prejudice in an order dated December 16, 2017. The Company has paid its $250,000, representing its insurance retention. The balance was paid by the Company’s insurance carrier.$28,000.

 

Former Chinese Distributor - FCPA

 

With the assistance of outside counsel, the Company conducted a voluntary investigation into the business practices of the independent Chinese entity that previously distributed its products in China and the Company’s knowledge of those business practices, which may have implications under the FCPA, as well as into various internal controls issues identified during the investigation.investigation (the “Investigation”).

 

On September 27, 2016 and September 28, 2016, the Company voluntarily contacted the SEC and the DOJ, respectively, to advise both agencies of these potential issues. The Company has provided and will continue to provide documents and other information to the SEC and the DOJ, and is cooperating fully with these agencies in their ongoing investigations of these matters.

 


Although the Company’s investigation is complete, additional issues or facts could arise which may expand the scope or severity of the potential violations. The Company has no current information derived from the investigation or otherwise to suggest that its previously reported financial statements and results are incorrect.

 

At this stage, the Company is unable to predict what, if any, action the DOJ or the SEC may take or what, if any, penalties or remedial measures these agencies may seek. Nor can the Company predict the impact on the Company as a result of these matters, which may include the imposition of fines, civil and criminal penalties, which are not currently estimable, as well as equitable remedies, including disgorgement of any profits earned from improper conduct and injunctive relief, limitations on the Company’s conduct, and the imposition of a compliance monitor. The DOJ and the SEC periodically have based the amount of a penalty or disgorgement in connection with an FCPA action, at least in part, on the amount of profits that a company obtained from the business in which the violations of the FCPA occurred. During its distributorship relationship with the prior Chinese distributor from 2010 through 2016, the Company generated revenues of approximately $8 million.

 

Further, the Company may suffer other civil penalties or adverse impacts, including lawsuits by private litigants in addition to the lawsuits that already have been filed, or investigations and fines imposed by local authorities. The investigative costs to date are approximately $2.8$3.1 million, of which approximately $0.1 million and $0.3$0.2 million was charged to general and administrative expenses during the three and nine months ended March 31,September 30, 2018 respectively, compared with $0.6 million and $2.1 million for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2017.2017 respectively.

 


Former Chinese Distributor – Litigation

 

On April 5, 2017, the Company’s former distributor in China, Cicel (Beijing) Science & Technology Co., Ltd., filed a lawsuit against the Company and certain officers and directors of the Company in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, alleging that the Company improperly terminated its contract with the former distributor. The complaint sought various remedies, including compensatory and punitive damages, specific performance and preliminary and post judgment injunctive relief, and asserted various causes of action, including breach of contract, unfair competition, tortious interference with contract, fraudulent inducement, and conversion. On October 7, 2017, the court granted the Company’s motion to dismiss all of the tort claims asserted against it, and also granted the individual defendants’ motion to dismiss all claims asserted against them. The only claim currently remaining in the case is for breach of contract against the Company.Company; the plaintiff has moved to amend its complaint to add tort claims, which the Company has opposed. The Company believes it has various legal and factual defenses to the allegations in the complaint, and intends to vigorously defend the action. The case is at its earliest stages; discovery is just beginning and there is no trial date.

 

Stockholder Derivative Litigation

 

On June 6, 2017, Irving Feldbaum, an individual shareholder of Misonix, filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York. The complaint alleges claims against the Company’s board of directors, its former CEO and CFO, certain of its former directors, and the Company as a nominal defendant for alleged violations of Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and state law claims for breach of fiduciary duty, waste of corporate assets, and unjust enrichment. The complaint alleges that the Company incurred damages as a result of alleged false and misleading statements in the Company’s securities filings concerning the Company’s business, operations, and prospects and the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. The complaint also alleges that the Company’s February 4, 2016 Proxy Statement contained false and misleading statements regarding executive compensation. The complaint seeks the recovery of damages on behalf of the Company and the implementation of changes to corporate governance procedures. On June 16, 2017, Michael Rubin, another individual shareholder of Misonix, filed a case alleging similar claims in the same district court. On July 21, 2017, the district court consolidated the two actions for all purposes. The caseOn July 16, 2018, the Company and counsel for Mr. Feldbaum and Mr. Rubin informed the District Court that the parties had reached a settlement in principle. There are aspects of the settlement that remain to be negotiated and documented, and the settlement is at its earliest stages; there has been no discovery and there is no trial date. The Company is not able eithersubject to estimateapproval by the amount of potential loss it may recognize, if any, from these claims orDistrict Court after notice to identify any changes in corporate governance procedures it may undertake, if any, as a result of these claims.the Company’s shareholders.

 


10.11. Related Party Transactions

 

OrthoXact Proprietary Limited (“OrthoXact”) (formerly Applied BioSurgical) is an independent distributor for the Company in South Africa. The chief executive officer of OrthoXact is also the brother of Stavros G. Vizirgianakis, the CEO of Misonix, Inc.

 

Set forth below is a table showing the Company’s net revenues for the ninethree months ended March 31September 30 and accounts receivable at March 31September 30 for the indicated time periods below with OrthoXact:

 

 For the nine months ended  For the three months ended 
 March 31,  September 30, 
 2018 2017  2018 2017 
          
Sales $675,943  $367,592  $296,881  $169,340 
Accounts receivable $120,376  $104,678  $236,478  $154,475 

 

14

11.12. Income Taxes

 

For the three and nine months ended March 31,September 30, 2018 and 2017, the Company recorded income tax expense (benefit), as follows:

 

  For the three months ended  For the nine months ended 
  March 31,  March 31, 
  2018  2017  2018  2017 
             
 Income tax expense (benefit) $411,405  $(219,000) $(97,744) $(275,000)
 Provisional reduction of deferred tax                
  asset relating to Tax Legislation        1,764,039    
 Valuation allowance on deferred tax asset  (411,405)     3,577,127    
                 
 Net income tax expense (benefit) $  $(219,000) $5,243,422  $(275,000)
  For the three months ended 
  September 30, 
  2018  2017 
       
Income tax benefit $(427,000) $(281,000)
Valuation allowance on deferred tax asset  427,000   —   
         
Net income tax benefit $—    $(281,000)

 

For the ninethree months ended March 31,September 30, 2018 and 2017, the effective rate of (892.7%)0% and 16.0%18.8%, respectively, varied from the U.S. federal statutory rate primarily due to the recording of a full valuation allowance on the remaining deferred tax assets, permanent book tax differences relating principally to stock compensation expense and tax credits, and the impact of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017.

 

Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017

 

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, (the “Tax Legislation”), enacted on December 22, 2017, contains significant changes to U.S. tax law, including lowering the U.S. corporate income tax rate to 21%, implementing a territorial tax system, and imposing a one-time tax on deemed repatriated earnings of foreign subsidiaries.

The Tax Legislation reduces the U.S. statutory tax rate from 35% to 21%, effective January 1, 2018. U.S. tax law requires that taxpayers with a fiscal year that begins before and ends after the effective date of a rate change calculate a blended tax rate based on the pro rata number of days in the fiscal year before and after the effective date. As a result, for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2018, the Company’s U.S. statutory income tax rate will be 27.55%.

On December 22, 2017, the SEC staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118 (“SAB 118”), which provides guidance on accounting for the tax effects of the Tax Legislation. SAB 118 provides a measurement period that should not extend beyond one year from the Tax Legislation enactment date for companies to complete the accounting under ASC 740, Income Taxes. In accordance with SAB 118, a company must reflect the income tax effects of those aspects of the Tax Legislation for which the accounting under ASC 740 is complete. To the extent that a company’s accounting for certain income tax effects of the Tax Legislation is incomplete but it is able to determine a reasonable estimate, it must record a provisional estimate in the financial statements. During the three months ended December 31, 2017, using the information available at the time, the Company recorded a provisional $1,764,039 discrete tax expense representing the expense of remeasuring its U.S. deferred tax assets at the lower 21% U.S. statutory tax rate. The Company may make additional adjustments in fiscal 2018 as further information is identified to properly record this adjustment.

 

Valuation Allowance on Deferred Tax Assets

 

Deferred tax assets refer to assets that are attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets in essence represent future savings of taxes that would otherwise be paid in cash. The realization of the deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of sufficient future taxable income, including capital gains. If it is determined that the deferred tax assets cannot be realized, a valuation allowance must be established, with a corresponding charge to net income.

 

In accordance with ASC Topic 740, the Company establishes valuation allowances for deferred tax assets that, in its judgment are not more likely-than-not realizable. The guidance requires entities to evaluate all available positive and negative evidence, including cumulative results in recent periods, weighted based on its objectivity, in determining whether its deferred tax assets are more likely than not realizable.

 


The Company regularly assesses its ability to realize its deferred tax assets. While the Company had positive cumulative pretax income as of June 30, 2017, based on actual results to datefor fiscal 2018 and the Company’s current forecast for fiscal 2019 the Company is in a three-year cumulative loss position at September 30, 2018, and it expects to be in a cumulative pretax loss position as of JuneSeptember 30, 2018.2019. Management evaluated available positive evidence, including the continued growth of the Company’s revenues and gross profit margins, its recent SonaStar technology license to its Chinese partner and the reduction in investigative and professional fees recognized in fiscal 2017, along with available negative evidence, including the Company’s continuing investment in building its next generation Nexus platform and its continuing investment in building a direct sales force, while at the same time paying commissions to its domestic sales distributors. After weighing both the positive and negative evidence, management concluded that the Company’s deferred tax assets are not more likely-than-not realizable. Accordingly, the Company recorded a full valuation allowance of $3,577,127 against its remaining deferred tax assets at Marchas of December 31, 2017 and has continued to record valuation allowances against its deferred tax assets through September 30, 2018. The Company will continue to assess its ability to utilize its net operating loss carryforwards, and will reverse this valuation allowance when sufficient evidence is achieved to allow the realizability of such deferred tax assets.

 

As of March 31,September 30, 2018 and June 30, 2017,2018, the Company hashad no material unrecognized tax benefits or accrued interest and penalties.

12. Licensing Agreements for Medical Technology

On October 19, 2017, the Company entered into a License and Exclusive Manufacturing Agreement (the “Agreement”) with Hunan Xing Hang Rui Kang Bio-technologies Co., Ltd., a Chinese corporation (the “Licensee”) under which Misonix has licensed certain manufacturing and distribution rights to its SonaStar product line in China, Hong Kong and Macau (the “Territory”) in exchange for payments totaling at least $11,000,000.

Pursuant to the Agreement, Licensee is obligated to pay the Company: (i) initial amounts consisting of upfront fees and stocking orders totaling $5,000,000, payable in five (5) equal monthly installments of $1,000,000 each; (ii) royalty payments from the sale of SonaStar products in the Territory, including minimum royalty payments of $2,000,000 per calendar year in each of 2019, 2020, and 2021; and (iii) reimbursement of technology transfer costs in an amount up to $1,000,000. The Agreement also provides that Misonix will supply SonaStar products to Licensee at agreed prices during the transition period prior to Licensee’s commencement of manufacturing.

During the three months ended March 31, 2018, the Company delivered the licensed SonaStar technology to the Licensee, and recorded license revenue of $4,010,000. In addition, during the nine months ended March 31, 2018, the Company had delivered the contractually agreed number of SonaStar units to the Licensee and had recorded product revenue of $990,000. All of the $5 million of initial payments were collected as of March 31, 2018.

In October 1996, the Company entered into a license agreement with MMIT which expired August 2017, covering the further development and commercial exploitation of the Company’s medical technology relating to laparoscopic products, which uses high frequency sound waves to coagulate and divide tissue for both open and laparoscopic surgery. The MMIT license provided for exclusive worldwide marketing and sales rights for this technology. The Company received a 5% royalty on sales of these products by MMIT. Royalties from this license agreement were $524,000 and $2,838,000 for the nine months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. This royalty agreement expired in August 2017.

 

13. Segment Reporting

 

Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available that is evaluated on a regular basis by the chief operating decision-maker (“CODM”) in deciding how to allocate resources to an individual segment and in assessing performance of the segment. The Company has concluded that its Chief Executive Officer is the CODM as he is the ultimate decision maker for key operating decisions, determining the allocation of resources and assessing the financial performance of the Company. These decisions, allocations and assessments are performed by the CODM using consolidated financial information. Consolidated financial information is utilized by the CODM as the Company’s current product offering primarily consists of minimally invasive therapeutic ultrasonic medical devices. The Company’s products are relatively consistent and manufacturing is centralized and consistent across product offerings. Based on these factors, key operating decisions and resource allocations are made by the CODM using consolidated financial data and as such the Company has concluded that it operates as one segment.


Worldwide revenue for the Company’s products and license revenue is categorized as follows:

 

  For the three months ended  For the nine months ended 
  March 31,  March 31, 
Product revenue: 2018  2017  2018  2017 
Domestic $4,931,028  $4,015,308  $14,983,595  $12,019,103 
International  3,498,104   3,162,455   9,050,105   7,360,665 
Total  8,429,132   7,177,763   24,033,700   19,379,768 
                 
License revenue  4,010,000      4,010,000    
Total revenue $12,439,132  $7,177,763  $28,043,700  $19,379,768 

   For the three months ended  Net Change 
   September 30,  $  % 
   2018  2017       
Domestic  $5,404,518  $4,727,342  $677,176   14.3%
International   3,956,646   2,553,381   1,403,265   55.0%
Total  $9,361,164  $7,280,723  $2,080,441   28.6%

 

Substantially all of the Company’s long-lived assets are located in the United States.

14. Severance

On August 26, 2016, the Company and the Company’s former Chief Executive Officer, Michael McManus (“McManus”) entered into a retirement agreement and general release (the “Retirement Agreement”). Pursuant to the Retirement Agreement, on September 2, 2016 Mr. McManus resigned as a Director and the Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company and retired as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company. Pursuant to the Retirement Agreement, the Company agreed to (i) pay Mr. McManus’ salary through June 30, 2017 at the then current level; (ii) continue to pay premiums for Mr. McManus’ and his dependents’ coverage under the Company’s medical, dental, vision, hospitalization, long term care and life insurance coverage through June 30, 2017 at the then current levels upon timely election by Mr. McManus under the law informally known as COBRA; and (iii) extend the exercisability of previously granted and then currently vested options to purchase shares of Common Stock through June 30, 2017. In addition, Mr. McManus had continued use of the vehicle provided him pursuant to his prior employment agreement through December 31, 2016. In connection with this Retirement Agreement, the Company recorded a charge of $330,000 during the quarter ended September 30, 2016 to accrue for the cash portion of these benefits, which was paid during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017. In addition, during the quarter ended June 30, 2016, the Company recorded a non-cash compensation expense of $61,000 in connection with the modification of the terms of his vested stock options, and recorded a reduction in non-cash compensation expense of $596,000 relating to the forfeiture of his unvested stock options.


Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

 

This Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of Misonix and its subsidiaries, which we refer to as the “Company”, “Misonix”, “we”, “our” and “us”, should be read in conjunction with the accompanying unaudited financial statements included in Part I – Item 1 “Financial Statements” of this Report and Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on August 24, 2017,September 13, 2018, for the fiscal year ended June 30, 20172018 (“20172018 Form 10-K”). Item 7 of the 20172018 Form 10-K describes the application of our critical accounting policies, for which there have been no significant changes during the three and nine months ended March 31,September 30, 2018.

 

Forward Looking Statements

 

With the exception of historical information contained in this Form 10-Q, content herein may contain “forward looking statements” that are made pursuant to the Safe Harbor Provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements are based on management’s current expectations and are subject to uncertainty and changes in circumstances. We cannot guarantee that any forward looking statements will be accurate, although we believe that we have been reasonable in our expectations and assumptions. Investors should realize that if underlying assumptions prove inaccurate or unknown risks or uncertainties materialize, actual results could vary materially from our expectations and projections. These factors include general economic conditions, delays and risks associated with the performance of contracts, risks associated with international sales and currency fluctuations, uncertainties as a result of research and development, acceptable results from clinical studies, including publication of results and patient/procedure data with varying levels of statistical relevance, risks involved in introducing and marketing new products, regulatory compliance, potential acquisitions, consumer and industry acceptance, litigation and/or contemplated 510(k) filings, the ability to achieve and maintain profitability in our business lines, the pending FCPA investigation and other factors discussed in the 20172018 Form 10-K, subsequent Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Current Reports on Form 8-K. We disclaim any obligation to update any forward-looking statements.


Overview

 

Misonix designs, manufactures develops and markets minimally invasive therapeutic ultrasonic medical devices. These products are used for precise bone sculpting, removal of soft and hard tumors, and tissue debridement, primarily in the areas of neurosurgery, orthopedic surgery, plastic surgery, wound care and wound and burn care.maxillo-facial surgery. In the United States, the Company sells its products through its direct sales force, in addition to a network of commissioned agents assisted by Company personnel. Outside of the United States, the Company generally sells to distributors who then resell the products to hospitals. The Company operates as one business segment.

 

In the United States, the Company is taking a more aggressive approach to taking market share, expanding the market and increasing its share of recurring disposable revenue by using a consignment model, whereby the Company will consign the equipment (which is defined as a generator, hand units and accessories) (the “Equipment”) and sell to customers higher margin disposable, single use items (the “Consumables”) on a recurring basis. Title remains with the Company with respect to consigned Equipment, which is depreciated and charged to selling expenses over a five year period beginning in fiscal 2017, and a three year period in fiscal 2016.period. Outside of the United States, the Company has principally not yet adopted a consignment model. The Company’s overall goal is to increase the utilization rate of Equipment which will increase the total number of procedures and maximize the sale of Consumables to our customers, with the goal of becoming the standard of care in the various segmentsmedical procedures we focus on.

 

Results of Operations

 

The following discussion and analysis provides information which the Company’s management believes is relevant to an assessment and understanding of the Company’s results of operations and financial condition. This discussion should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto appearing elsewhere herein. Unless otherwise specified, this discussion relates solely to the Company’s continuing operations.

 


All of the Company’s revenues have been derived from the sale of medical device products, which include manufacture and distribution of ultrasonic medical device products.

 

Three months ended March 31,September 30, 2018 and 2017

 

Our revenues by category for the three months ended March 31,September 30, 2018 and 2017 are as follows:


  For the three months ended       
  March 31,  Net change 
  2018  2017  $  % 
Total            
Consumables $5,898,937  $5,281,454  $617,483   11.7%
Equipment  2,530,195   1,896,309   633,886   33.4%
License  4,010,000      4,010,000   100.0%
Total $12,439,132  $7,177,763  $5,261,369   73.3%
                 
Domestic product:                
Consumables $4,340,759  $3,736,960  $603,799   16.2%
Equipment  590,269   278,348   311,921   112.1%
Total $4,931,028  $4,015,308  $915,720   22.8%
                 
International product:                
Consumables $1,558,178  $1,544,494  $13,684   0.9%
Equipment  1,939,926   1,617,961   321,965   19.9%
Total $3,498,104  $3,162,455  $335,649   10.6%
                 
License $4,010,000  $  $4,010,000   100.0%

   For the three months ended       
   September 30,  Net change 
   2018  2017  $  % 
Total             
Consumables  $6,339,108  $5,379,589  $959,519   17.8%
Equipment   3,022,056   1,901,134   1,120,922   59.0%
Total  $9,361,164  $7,280,723  $2,080,441   28.6%
                  
Domestic:                 
Consumables  $4,825,599  $4,134,918  $690,681   16.7%
Equipment   578,919   592,424   (13,505)  -2.3%
Total  $5,404,518  $4,727,342  $677,176   14.3%
                  
International:                 
Consumables  $1,513,509  $1,244,671  $268,838   21.6%
Equipment   2,443,137   1,308,710   1,134,427   86.7%
Total  $3,956,646  $2,553,381  $1,403,265   55.0%

 

Revenues

 

Total revenue increased 73.3%28.6% or $5.3$2.1 million to $12.4$9.4 million in the thirdfirst quarter of fiscal 2018,2019, from $7.2 million in fiscal 2017.

Product revenue increased 17.4% or $1.3 million to $8.4$7.3 million in the thirdfirst quarter of fiscal 2018, from $7.2 million in fiscal 2017. 2018.

The revenue increase is principally attributable to US producta 17.8% or $1.0 million increase in consumables revenue, which grew 22.8%, in addition to internationala 59.0% or $1.1 million increase in equipment revenue. The BoneScalpel and SonicOne product revenue which grew 10.6% forlines both performed well during the third quarter of fiscal 2018.quarter.

 

License revenue was $4.0 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2018, resulting from the Company’s license of SonaStar technology to one of its Chinese distributors. There was no license revenue induring the first quarter of fiscal 2017. See Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements.2019 or fiscal 2018.

 

Gross profit

 

Gross profit from product revenue in the thirdfirst quarter of fiscal 20182019 was 68.8%70.6% of revenue, slightly lowerhigher from 70.6%70.1% in the thirdfirst quarter of fiscal 2017,2018, resulting from product mix.

 

Selling expenses

 

Selling expenses increased by $0.8$1.2 million, or 24%32.6% to $4.4$4.7 million in the thirdfirst quarter of fiscal 20182019 from $3.6 million in the prior year period. The increase is principally related to higher compensation costs and travel related expenses resulting from the continued buildout of the Company’s direct sales force, along with higher commissions relating to the 17.4% increase in product revenue.trade show and sales training expenses.

 

General and administrative expenses

 

General and administrative expenses decreasedincreased by $0.6 million, or 22.5%23.7% to $1.9$3.2 million in the thirdfirst quarter of fiscal 20182019 from $2.5$2.6 million in the prior year period. This decreaseincrease is principally related to a decreasenon-cash compensation charge of $0.8 million in$475,000 related to an acceleration of vesting on an existing restricted stock award, where market conditions were met to allow for the early vesting of the award. In addition, the Company incurred higher regulatory professional fees of $240,000, in part for new product registrations, and incurred a $150,000 severance charge during the quarter. These expense increases were partially offset by an increase of non-cash compensation expense for stock option grants tocost reductions put into place over the Company’s board of directors, and an increase in compensation expense. During the third quarter of the prior year, the Company was incurring higher costs for its internal investigation.past year.


Research and development expenses

 

Research and development expenses increased by $0.7$0.4 million or 157.6%45% to $1.2$1.3 million in the thirdfirst quarter of fiscal 20182019 from $0.5$0.9 million in the prior year period. The Company is investing in the design and development of its next generation platform product, Nexus, which is expected to be available in fiscal 2019. During the thirdfirst quarter of fiscal 2018,2019, approximately $0.8$0.6 million was charged to research and development expenses related to this product.

 

Other income (expense)

 

Other income was $4,278$1,548 in the thirdfirst quarter of fiscal 20182019 compared with $0.9$0.4 million in the prior year period. This decrease related to the royalty income from MMIT in the prior year. This royalty agreement expired in August 2017.

 

Income taxes

 

For the three months ended March 31,September 30, 2018 and 2017, the Company recorded an income tax expense (benefit) of $0 and ($219,000)281,000), respectively. For the three months ended March 31,September 30, 2018 and 2017, the effective rate of 0% and 41.6%18.8%, respectively, varied from the U.S. federal statutory rate due to changes in the Company’s projected pretax book income.

 

Income tax expense for the quarter ended September 30, 2018 includes a $411,405 reduction in the$427,000 valuation allowance against the Company’s remaining deferred tax assets.asset recorded in the quarter. In accordance with the guidance of ASC Topic 740, management concluded that in its judgment, the Company’s deferred tax assets at March 31, 2018 are not more likely-than-not realizable. The components of the tax provision are as follows:

  For the three months ended 
  March 31, 
  2018  2017 
       
Income tax expense (benefit) $411,405  $(219,000)
Provisional reduction of deferred tax asset relating to Tax Legislation      
Valuation allowance on deferred tax asset  (411,405)   
         
Net income tax expense (benefit) $  $(219,000)

Nine months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017

Our revenue by category for the nine months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017 are as follows:

  For the nine months ended       
  March 31,  Net change 
  2018  2017  $  % 
Total            
Consumables $17,404,539  $14,734,534  $2,670,005   18.1%
Equipment  6,629,161   4,645,234   1,983,927   42.7%
License  4,010,000      4,010,000   100.0%
Total $28,043,700  $19,379,768  $8,663,932   44.7%
                 
Domestic:                
Consumables $13,063,171  $10,899,498  $2,163,673   19.9%
Equipment  1,920,424   1,119,605   800,819   71.5%
Total $14,983,595  $12,019,103  $2,964,492   24.7%
                 
International:                
Consumables $4,341,368  $3,835,036  $506,332   13.2%
Equipment  4,708,737   3,525,629   1,183,108   33.6%
Total $9,050,105  $7,360,665  $1,689,440   23.0%
                 
License $4,010,000  $  $4,010,000   100.0%

Revenue

Total revenue increased 44.7% or $8.7 million to $28.0 million in the first three quarters of fiscal 2018, from $19.4 million in fiscal 2017.

Product revenue increased 24.0% or $4.7 million to $24.0 million in the nine months ended March 31, 2018, from $19.4 million in fiscal 2017. US product revenue grew 24.7% and international product revenue grew 23.0% for the first three quarters of fiscal 2018. Consumables revenue in the United States increased 19.9%, or $2.2 million for the current year, principally due to the strength in the Company’s BoneScalpel product line. International consumables revenue grew 13.2% for the current year.

License revenue was $4.0 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2018, resulting from the Company’s license of SonaStar technology to one of its Chinese distributors. There was no license revenue in fiscal 2017. See Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements.

Gross profit

Gross profit from product revenue in the first three quarters of fiscal 2018 was 69.7% of revenue, which decreased slightly from 69.9% in the first three quarters of fiscal 2017 as a result of product mix.

Selling expenses

Selling expenses increased by $1.8 million, or 17.2% to $11.9 million in the first three quarters of fiscal 2018 from $10.2 million in the prior year period. The increase is principally related to higher compensation costs resulting from the continued buildout of the Company’s direct sales force, along with higher commissions relating to the 24.0% increase in product revenue.

General and administrative expenses

General and administrative expenses increased by $0.4 million, or 5.8% to $6.9 million in the first three quarters of fiscal 2018 from $6.5 million in the prior year period. This increase is principally related to an increase of non-cash compensation expense for the first three quarters of fiscal 2018 of $2.1 million related to restricted stock and stock option grants to the Company’s board of directors and its current CEO, and an increase in compensation expense of $0.3 million. This increase was offset by a decrease of $1.3 million in professional fees. During the prior year, the Company was incurring higher costs for its internal investigation. In addition, during the first three quarters of fiscal 2017, the Company recorded a reduction in non-cash stock compensation expense of $0.8 million, which includes a reversal of stock compensation previously recognized on the Company’s prior CEO, along with a related $0.3 million severance charge for Company’s prior CEO.


Research and development expenses

Research and development expenses increased by $1.7 million, or 118.7% to $3.1 million in the first three quarters of fiscal 2018 from $1.4 million in the prior year period. The Company is investing in the design and development of its next generation product, which is expected to be available in fiscal 2019. For the first three quarters of fiscal 2018, approximately $1.9 million has been charged to research and development expenses related to this product.

Other income (expense)

Other income was $0.5 million for the first three quarters of fiscal 2018 compared with $2.8 million in the prior year period. This decrease related to the royalty income from MMIT in the prior year. This royalty agreement expired in August 2017.

Income taxes

For the nine months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017, the Company recorded an income tax expense (benefit) of $5,243,422 and ($275,000), respectively. For the nine months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017, the effective rate of (892.7%) and 16.0%, respectively, varied from the U.S. federal statutory rate due to changes in the Company’s projected pretax book income.

The income tax expense for the first three quarters of fiscal 2018 included a one-time charge of $1.8 million to revalue the Company’s deferred tax asset as of December 31, 2017 to give effect to the reduction in corporate tax rates to 21% effective January 1, 2018, as a result of the Tax Legislation, enacted on December 22, 2017. Income tax expense also includes a $3.6 million charge to record a full valuation allowance against the Company’s remaining deferred tax assets. In accordance with the guidance of ASC Topic 740, management concluded that in its judgment, the Company’s deferred tax assets at March 31,September 30, 2018 are not more likely-than-not realizable. The components of the tax provision are as follows:

 

  For the nine months ended 
  March 31, 
  2018  2017 
       
Income tax expense (benefit) $(97,744) $(275,000)
Provisional reduction of deferred tax asset relating to Tax Legislation  1,764,039    
Valuation allowance on deferred tax asset  3,577,127    
         
Net income tax expense (benefit) $5,243,422  $(275,000)
  For the three months ended 
  September 30, 
  2018  2017 
       
Income tax benefit $(427,000) $(281,000)
Valuation allowance on deferred tax asset  427,000    
         
Net income tax benefit $  $(281,000)

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

Working capital at March 31,September 30, 2018 was $18.6$15.9 million. For the ninethree months ended March 31,September 30, 2018, cash provided fromused in operations was $1.0$1.7 million, mainly due a use of $0.5 million for working capital and the 24% increase in product revenue,loss from operations during the $4.0 million of license revenue from the Company’s SonaStar technology agreement in China, and a reduction in accounts receivable of $0.7 million, offset by a $1.2 million increase in inventory and a $1.0 million reduction in accounts payable and accrued expenses.quarter.

 

Cash used in investing activities was $0.5$0.3 million, primarily consisting of the purchase of property, plant and equipment along with filing for additional patents.

 

Cash provided by financing activities was $0.2$0.4 million, resulting from stock option exercises.


As of March 31,September 30, 2018, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of approximately $12.3$9.3 million and believes it has sufficient cash to finance operations for at least the next 12 months.

 

Relating to the internal investigation described herein, the Company has incurred approximately $2.8$3.1 million in investigative costs through March 31,September 30, 2018 and is not expected to incur significant additional investigative costs to resolve this matter. Further, the Company could be subject to fines or penalties related to potential violations of the FCPA.

 

The Company has been receiving an annual royalty from MMIT which has averaged $3.7 million per year over the last three fiscal years. This royalty ended in August 2017. Additionally, as described in Note 12 to the financial statements, in October 2017, the Company entered into a License and Exclusive Manufacturing Agreement which is providing minimum payments to the Company of $11 million through 2021, of which $5 million has been received as of March 31, 2018.


The Company is investing in the design and development of its next generation platform product, which is expected to be available in fiscal 2019 of which $1.9$0.6 million in development costs have been incurred forduring the ninethree months ended March 31,September 30, 2018.

 

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

 

The Company has no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on the Company’s financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that are material to the Company.

 

Other

 

In the opinion of management, inflation has not had a material effect on the operations of the Company.

 

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

 

See Note 1 to our consolidated financial statements included herein.

 

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

 

Market Risk:

 

The principal market risks (i.e., the risk of loss arising from adverse changes in market rates and prices) to which the Company is exposed are interest rates on cash and cash equivalents.

 

Interest Rate Risk:

 

The Company earns interest on cash balances and pays interest on any debt incurred. In light of the Company’s existing cash, results of operations and projected borrowing requirements, the Company does not believe that a 10% change in interest rates would have a significant impact on its consolidated financial position.


Item 4. Controls and Procedures

 

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

 

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) that are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.


All internal control systems, no matter how well designed and tested, have inherent limitations, including, among other things, the possibility of human error, circumvention or disregard. Therefore, even those systems of internal control that have been determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance that the objectives of the control system are met and may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

 

Material Weakness

In the 2018 Form 10-K, we disclosed that management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2018, based on the criteria established in the 2013Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based upon this evaluation, management determined, because of a lack of consistency in the approval of manual journal entries to the general ledger, a material weakness existed at June 30, 2018, as described below. In light of such material weakness, management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was ineffective as of June 30, 2018.

The Company’s financial procedures require that when preparing a journal entry for posting to the general ledger, such journal entry requires the review and written approval of the appropriate finance personnel, other than the individual creating the journal entry. The Company identified a number of instances where journal entries did not contain evidence of the proper written approval. To remediate the design of this control, the Company has converted its entire operation, effective July 1, 2018, onto a new NetSuite ERP system, from its legacy ERP system. The legacy system required a higher number of manual journal entries, compared with the new system which will require fewer manual journal entries because of the level of system integration and sophistication. In addition, the Company has implemented procedures to ensure that all journal entries are properly approved including a review at month end by the CFO to ensure that all journal entries are properly authorized.

The identified control deficiency did not result in any material misstatements in our financial statements. However, this control deficiency created a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement to the consolidated financial statements would not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Accordingly, we concluded that the control deficiency represented a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting and our internal control over financial reporting was not effective.

Evaluation at September 30, 2018

We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of management, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of March 31,September 30, 2018. Based on this evaluation, our CEO and CFO have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of March 31,September 30, 2018. While the Company believes it has remediated the design of the control described above, it is still in the process of testing its operating effectiveness.

 

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

 

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the quarter ended March 31,September 30, 2018 that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.


PART II — OTHER INFORMATION

 

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

 

Former Chinese Distributor - FCPA

 

With the assistance of outside counsel, the Company conducted a voluntary investigation into the business practices of the independent Chinese entity that previously distributed its products in China and the Company’s knowledge of those business practices, which may have implications under the FCPA, as well as into various internal controls issues identified during the investigation.investigation (the “Investigation”).

 

On September 27, 2016 and September 28, 2016, the Company voluntarily contacted the SEC and the DOJ, respectively, to advise both agencies of these potential issues. The Company has provided and will continue to provide documents and other information to the SEC and the DOJ, and is cooperating fully with these agencies in their ongoing investigations of these matters.

 

Although the Company’s investigation is complete, additional issues or facts could arise which may expand the scope or severity of the potential violations. The Company has no current information derived from the investigation or otherwise to suggest that its previously reported financial statements and results are incorrect.

 

At this stage, the Company is unable to predict what, if any, action the DOJ or the SEC may take or what, if any, penalties or remedial measures these agencies may seek. Nor can the Company predict the impact on the Company as a result of these matters, which may include the imposition of fines, civil and criminal penalties, which are not currently estimable, as well as equitable remedies, including disgorgement of any profits earned from improper conduct and injunctive relief, limitations on the Company’s conduct, and the imposition of a compliance monitor. The DOJ and the SEC periodically have based the amount of a penalty or disgorgement in connection with an FCPA action, at least in part, on the amount of profits that a company obtained from the business in which the violations of the FCPA occurred. During its distributorship relationship with the prior Chinese distributor from 2010 through 2016, the Company generated revenuerevenues of approximately $8 million.

 

Further, the Company may suffer other civil penalties or adverse impacts, including lawsuits by private litigants in addition to the lawsuits that already have been filed, or investigations and fines imposed by local authorities. The investigative costs to date are approximately $2.8$3.1 million, of which approximately $0.1 million and $0.3$0.2 million was charged to general and administrative expenses during the three and nine months ended March 31,September 30, 2018 respectively, compared with $0.6 million and $2.1 million for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2018.2017, respectively.

 

Former Chinese Distributor – Litigation

 

On April 5, 2017, the Company’s former distributor in China, Cicel (Beijing) Science & Technology Co., Ltd., filed a lawsuit against the Company and certain officers and directors of the Company in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, alleging that the Company improperly terminated its contract with the former distributor. The complaint sought various remedies, including compensatory and punitive damages, specific performance and preliminary and post judgment injunctive relief, and asserted various causes of action, including breach of contract, unfair competition, tortious interference with contract, fraudulent inducement, and conversion. On October 7, 2017, the court granted the Company’s motion to dismiss all of the tort claims asserted against it, and also granted the individual defendants’ motion to dismiss all claims asserted against them. The only claim currently remaining in the case is for breach of contract against the Company.Company; the plaintiff has moved to amend its complaint to add tort claims, which the Company has opposed. The Company believes it has various legal and factual defenses to the allegations in the complaint, and intends to vigorously defend the action. The case is at its earliest stages; discovery is just beginning and there is no trial date.


Stockholder Derivative Litigation

 

On June 6, 2017, Irving Feldbaum, an individual shareholder of Misonix, filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York. The complaint alleges claims against the Company’s board of directors, its former CEO and CFO, certain of its former directors, and the Company as a nominal defendant for alleged violations of Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and state law claims for breach of fiduciary duty, waste of corporate assets, and unjust enrichment. The complaint alleges that the Company incurred damages as a result of alleged false and misleading statements in the Company’s securities filings concerning the Company’s business, operations, and prospects and the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. The complaint also alleges that the Company’s February 4, 2016 Proxy Statement contained false and misleading statements regarding executive compensation. The complaint seeks the recovery of damages on behalf of the Company and the implementation of changes to corporate governance procedures. On June 16, 2017, Michael Rubin, another individual shareholder of Misonix, filed a case alleging similar claims in the same district court. On July 21, 2017, the district court consolidated the two actions for all purposes. The caseOn July 16, 2018, the Company and counsel for Mr. Feldbaum and Mr. Rubin informed the District Court that the parties had reached a settlement in principle. There are aspects of the settlement that remain to be negotiated and documented, and the settlement is at its earliest stages; there has been no discovery and there is no trial date. The Company is not able eithersubject to estimateapproval by the amount of potential loss it may recognize, if any, from these claims orDistrict Court after notice to identify any changes in corporate governance procedures it may undertake, if any, as a result of these claims.the Company’s shareholders.

 

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

 

Risks and uncertainties that, if they were to occur, could materially adversely affect our business or that could cause our actual results to differ materially from the results contemplated by the forward-looking statements contained in this Report and other public statements were set forth in the Item 1A. – “Risk Factors” section of our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017.2018. There have been no material changes from the risk factors disclosed in that Form 10-K.

 

Item 6. Exhibits

 

Exhibit No. Description
   

10.131.1

 Amendment No. 1 to License and Exclusive Manufacturing Agreement dated February 26, 2018 between the Company and Hunan Xing Hang Rui Kang Bio-technologies Co., Ltd.
31.1Chief Executive Officer—Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
   
31.2 Chief Financial Officer—Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
   
32.1 Chief Executive Officer—Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002.
   
32.2 Chief Financial Officer—Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002.
   
101.INS XBRL Instance Document
   
101.SCH XBRL Taxonomy Extension Scheme Document
   
101.CAL XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
   
101.DEF XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
   
101.LAB XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
   
101.PRE XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 

 MISONIX, INC.
   
Dated: May 7,November 8, 2018By:/s/ Stavros G. Vizirgianakis
  Stavros G. Vizirgianakis
  Chief Executive Officer
   
 By:/s/ Joseph P. Dwyer
  Joseph P. Dwyer
  Chief Financial Officer


27