UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017

[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from __________ to __________

Commission file number: 001-36204

Energy Fuels Inc.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)



Ontario	98-1067994
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)



225 Union Blvd., Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado	80228
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)	(Zip Code)

(303) 389-4130

(Registrant’s Telephone Number, including Area Code)

Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes [X] No [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes [X] No [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “Accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (Check one):



Large Accelerated Filer [ ]	Accelerated Filer [X]	Non-Accelerated Filer [ ]	Smaller Reporting Company [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act):

Yes [ ] No [X]

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practical date:

~~66,205,153~~71,405,375 common shares, without par value, outstanding as of ~~November~~August 2, ~~2016.~~2017.

ENERGY FUELS INC.

FORM 10-Q

For the Quarter Ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017

INDEX

Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information

This Quarterly Report and the exhibits attached hereto (the “Quarterly ~~Report”~~Report”) contain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of applicable US and Canadian securities laws. Such forward-looking statements concern Energy Fuels Inc.’s (the ~~“Company’s”~~“Company” or “Energy Fuels’”) anticipated results and progress of the Company’s operations in future periods, planned exploration, and, if warranted, development of its properties, plans related to its business, and other matters that may occur in the future. These statements relate to analyses and other information that are based on forecasts of future results, estimates of amounts not yet determinable and assumptions of management.

Any statements that express or involve discussions with respect to predictions, expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives, schedules, assumptions, future events, or performance (often, but not always, using words or phrases such as “expects” or “does not expect”, “is expected”, “anticipates” or “does not anticipate”, “plans”, “estimates” or “intends”, or stating that certain actions, events or results “may”, “could”, “would”, “might” or “will” be ~~“taken,~~taken, occur or be achieved”) are not statements of historical fact and may be forward-looking statements.

Forward-looking statements are based on the opinions and estimates of management as of the date such statements are made. Energy Fuels believes that the expectations reflected in ~~this~~these forward-looking ~~information~~statements are reasonable, but no assurance can be given that these expectations will prove to be correct, and such forward-looking ~~information~~statements included in, or incorporated by reference into, this Quarterly Report should not be unduly relied upon. This information speaks only as of the date of this Quarterly Report.

Readers are cautioned that it would be unreasonable to rely on any such forward-looking statements and information as creating any legal rights, and that the statements and information are not guarantees and may involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties, and that actual results are likely to differ (and may differ materially) and objectives and strategies may differ or change from those expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements or information as a result of various factors. Such risks and uncertainties include risks generally encountered in the exploration, development, operation, and closure of mineral properties and processing facilities. Forward-looking statements are subject to a variety of known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which could cause actual events or results to differ from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements, including, without limitation:

risks associated with mineral ~~reserves~~reserve and resource estimates, including the risk of errors in assumptions or methodologies;

risks associated with estimating mineral extraction and recovery, forecasting future price levels necessary to support mineral extraction and recovery, and the Company’s ability to increase mineral extraction and recovery in response to any increases in commodity prices or other market conditions;

uncertainties and liabilities inherent to conventional mineral extraction and recovery and/or in-situ uranium recovery operations;

geological, technical and processing problems, including unanticipated metallurgical difficulties, less than expected recoveries, ground control problems, process upsets, ~~and/or~~and equipment malfunctions;

risks associated with labor costs, labor disturbances, and unavailability of skilled labor;

risks associated with the availability and/or fluctuations in the costs of raw materials and consumables used in the ~~Company's~~Company’s production processes;

risks associated with environmental compliance and permitting, including those created by changes in environmental legislation and regulation, and delays in obtaining permits and licenses that could impact expected mineral extraction and recovery levels and costs;

actions taken by regulatory authorities with respect to mineral extraction and recovery activities;

risks associated with the Company’s dependence on third parties in the provision of transportation and other critical services;

risks associated with the ability of the Company to ~~negotiate access rights on certain properties on favorable terms or at all;~~

~~risks associated with the ability of the Company to~~ extend or renew land tenure, including mineral leases and surface use agreements, on favorable terms or at all;

risks associated with the ability of the Company to negotiate access rights on certain properties on favorable terms or at all;

the adequacy of the Company's insurance coverage;

uncertainty as to reclamation and decommissioning liabilities;

the ability of the Company’s bonding companies to require increases in the collateral required to secure reclamation obligations;

the potential for, and outcome of, litigation and other legal proceedings, including potential injunctions pending the outcome of such litigation and proceedings;

the ability of the Company to meet its obligations to its creditors;

risks associated with paying off indebtedness at its maturity;

risks associated with the Company’s relationships with its business and joint venture partners;

failure to obtain industry partner, government, and other third party consents and approvals, when required;

competition for, among other things, capital, mineral properties, and skilled personnel;

failure to complete proposed acquisitions and incorrect assessments of the value of completed acquisitions;

risks posed by fluctuations in share price levels, exchange rates and interest rates, and general economic conditions;

risks inherent in the Company’s and industry analysts’ forecasts or predictions of future uranium and vanadium price levels;

fluctuations in the market prices of uranium ~~vanadium~~ and ~~copper,~~vanadium, which are cyclical and subject to substantial price fluctuations;

failure to obtain suitable uranium sales terms, including spot and term sale contracts;

risks associated with asset impairment as a result of market conditions;

risks associated with lack of access to markets and the ability to access capital;

the market price of Energy Fuels’ securities;

public resistance to nuclear energy or uranium extraction and recovery;

uranium industry competition and international trade restrictions;

risks related to higher than expected costs related to our Nichols Ranch Project and Canyon Project;

risks related to securities regulations;

risks related to stock price and volume volatility;

risks related to our ability to maintain our listing on the NYSE MKT and Toronto Stock Exchanges;

risks related to our ability to maintain our inclusion in various stock indices;

risks related to dilution of currently outstanding shares;

risks related to our lack of dividends;

risks related to recent market events;

risks related to our issuance of additional common shares;

risks related to acquisition and integration issues;

risks related to defects in title to our mineral properties;

risks related to our outstanding debt; and

risks related to our securities.

This list is not exhaustive of the factors that may affect our forward-looking statements. Some of the important risks and uncertainties that could affect forward-looking statements are described further under the section headings: Item 1A. Risk Factors; and Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of this Quarterly Report. Although we have attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those described in forward-looking statements, there may be other factors that cause results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those anticipated, believed, estimated, or expected. We caution readers not to place undue reliance on any such forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date made. Except as required by law, we disclaim any obligation to subsequently revise any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of such statements or to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events. Statements relating to “Mineral Reserves” or “Mineral Resources” are deemed to be forward-looking ~~information,~~statements, as they involve the implied assessment, based on certain estimates and assumptions that the Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources described may be profitably extracted in the future.

We qualify all the forward-looking statements contained in this Quarterly Report by the foregoing cautionary statements.

Cautionary Note to United States Investors Concerning Disclosure of Mineral Resources

This Quarterly Report contains certain disclosure that has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of Canadian securities laws, which differ from the requirements of United States’ securities laws. Unless otherwise indicated, all reserve and resource estimates included in this Quarterly Report, and in the documents incorporated by reference herein, have been prepared in accordance with Canadian National Instrument 43-101 - Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (“NI 43-101”) and the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum (“CIM”) classification system. NI 43-101 is a rule developed by the Canadian Securities Administrators (the “CSA”) which establishes standards for all public disclosure an issuer makes of scientific and technical information concerning mineral projects. As a company incorporated in Canada, we estimate and report our resources and our current reserves according to the definitions set forth in NI 43-101.

Canadian standards, including NI 43-101, differ significantly from the requirements of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), and reserve and resource information contained herein, or incorporated by reference in this Quarterly Report, and in the documents incorporated by reference herein, may not be comparable to similar information disclosed by companies reporting under only United States standards. In particular, and without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the term “resource” does not equate to the term “reserve” under SEC Industry Guide 7. Under United States standards, mineralization may not be classified as a “reserve” unless the determination has been made that the mineralization could be economically and legally produced or extracted at the time the reserve determination is made. Under SEC Industry Guide 7 standards, a “final” or ~~“bankable”~~

“bankable” feasibility study is required to report reserves; the three-year historical average price, to the extent possible, is used in any reserve or cash flow analysis to designate reserves; and the primary environmental analysis or report must be filed with the appropriate governmental authority.

The SEC’s disclosure standards under Industry Guide 7 normally do not permit the inclusion of information concerning “measured mineral resources”, “indicated mineral resources” or “inferred mineral resources” or other descriptions of the amount of mineralization in mineral deposits that do not constitute “reserves” by United States standards in documents filed with the SEC. United States investors should also understand that “inferred mineral resources” have a great amount of uncertainty as to their existence and as to their economic and legal feasibility. It cannot be assumed that all or any part of an “inferred mineral resource” will ever be upgraded to a higher category. Under Canadian rules, estimated “inferred mineral resources” may not form the basis of feasibility or prefeasibility studies. United States investors are cautioned not to assume that all or any part of measured or indicated mineral resources will ever be converted into mineral reserves. Investors are cautioned not to assume that all or any part of an “inferred mineral resource” exists or is economically or legally mineable.

Disclosure of “contained pounds” or “contained ounces” in a resource estimate is permitted disclosure under Canadian regulations; however, the SEC normally only permits issuers to report mineralization that does not constitute “reserves” by SEC standards as in-place tonnage and grade without reference to unit measures. The requirements of NI 43-101 for identification of “reserves” are also not the same as those of the SEC, and reserves reported by the Company in compliance with NI 43-101 may not qualify as “reserves” under SEC Industry Guide 7 standards. Accordingly, information concerning mineral deposits set forth herein may not be comparable to information made public by companies that report in accordance with United States standards.

Stephen P. Antony, P.E. and CEO of Energy Fuels, is a Qualified Person as defined by NI 43-101 and has reviewed and approved the technical disclosure contained in this quarterly report including sampling, analytical, and test data underlying such disclosure.

PART I

ITEM 1. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

ENERGY FUELS INC.

Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss

(unaudited) (Expressed in thousands of US dollars, except per share amounts)


	For the three months ended						For the nine months ended						For the three months ended						For the six months ended
	September 30,						September 30,						June 30,						June 30,
	2016			2015			2016			2015			2017			2016			2017			2016
Revenue (Note 10)	$	8,702		$	19,159		$	33,704		$	50,464
Costs and expenses applicable to revenue	4,341			11,786			20,583			29,012
Impairment of inventories (Note 3)	1,379			—			2,998			—
Revenues
Uranium concentrates													$	15,043		$	6,999		$	18,540		$	24,977
Alternate feed materials processing and other													2,840			7			3,099			25
Total revenues													17,883			7,006			21,639			25,002
Costs and expenses applicable to revenues
Costs and expenses applicable to uranium concentrates													9,274			4,099			11,112			16,242
Costs and expenses applicable to alternate feed materials and other													1,797			—			2,030			—
Total costs and expenses applicable to revenues													11,071			4,099			13,142			16,242
Other operating costs
Impairment of inventories													1,957			1,619			1,957			1,619
Development, permitting and land holding	6,252			3,934			17,138			4,636			1,186			3,475			4,509			10,917
Standby costs	647			1,015			4,178			4,335			1,029			1,365			2,235			3,531
Abandonment of mineral properties	1,005			—			1,036			—			42			—			287			—
Impairment of assets held for sale	—			2,000			—			2,000			3,599			—			3,599			—
Accretion of asset retirement obligation	175			143			526			350			346			176			691			351
Selling costs	47			40			216			199			45			95			115			169
Intangible asset amortization	583			1,772			3,021			3,572			2,887			2,219			3,092			2,438
General and administration	3,815			3,887			11,928			9,223			3,378			4,285			7,806			8,113
Costs directly attributable to acquisitions	—			190			—			6,777
Total operating loss	(9,542		)	(5,608		)	(27,920		)	(9,640		)	(7,657		)	(10,327		)	(15,794		)	(18,378		)

Interest expense	(573		)	(625		)	(1,734		)	(1,391		)	(503		)	(585		)	(1,045		)	(1,161		)
Other income (Note 10)	1,870			838			2,103			373
Other income													3,680			471			1,763			233
Net loss	(8,245		)	(5,395		)	(27,551		)	(10,658		)	(4,480		)	(10,441		)	(15,076		)	(19,306		)

Items that may be reclassified in the future to profit and loss
Foreign currency translation adjustment	(701		)	846			(1,175		)	2,364			(448		)	327			(644		)	(474		)
Unrealized gain on available-for-sale assets	135			201			252			119
Other comprehensive income (loss)	(566		)	1,047			(923		)	2,483
Unrealized (loss) gain on available-for-sale assets													(548		)	34			(108		)	117
Other comprehensive (loss) income													(996		)	361			(752		)	(357		)
Comprehensive loss	$	(8,811	)	$	(4,348	)	$	(28,474	)	$	(8,175	)	$	(5,476	)	$	(10,080	)	$	(15,828	)	$	(19,663	)

Net loss attributable to:
Owners of the Company	$	(8,076	)	$	(5,344	)	$	(27,292	)	$	(10,607	)	$	(4,470	)	$	(10,408	)	$	(14,978	)	$	(19,216	)
Non-controlling interests	(169		)	(51		)	(259		)	(51		)	(10		)	(33		)	(98		)	(90		)
	$	(8,245	)	$	(5,395	)	$	(27,551	)	$	(10,658	)	$	(4,480	)	$	(10,441	)	$	(15,076	)	$	(19,306	)
Comprehensive loss attributable to:
Owners of the Company	$	(8,642	)	$	(4,297	)	$	(28,215	)	$	(8,124	)	$	(5,466	)	$	(10,047	)	$	(15,730	)	$	(19,573	)
Non-controlling interests	(169		)	(51		)	(259		)	(51		)	(10		)	(33		)	(98		)	(90		)
	$	(8,811	)	$	(4,348	)	$	(28,474	)	$	(8,175	)	$	(5,476	)	$	(10,080	)	$	(15,828	)	$	(19,663	)

Basic and diluted loss per share (Note 8)	$	(0.14	)	$	(0.12	)	$	(0.51	)	$	(0.36	)
Basic and diluted loss per share													$	(0.06	)	$	(0.20	)	$	(0.22	)	$	(0.38	)

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

ENERGY FUELS INC.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(unaudited)(Expressed in thousands of US dollars, except share amounts)


	As at						As of
	September 30, 2016			December 31, 2015			June 30, 2017			December 31, 2016
ASSETS
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	17,530		$	12,965		$	18,721		$	16,901
Trade and other receivables	550			2,617			3,488			364
Inventories (Note 3)	26,755			30,671
Inventories							13,346			16,761
Prepaid expenses and other assets	1,263			1,433			1,878			2,104
Mineral properties held for sale	—			1,301			5,200			—
Total current assets	46,098			48,987			42,633			36,130
Notes receivable and other	1,080			1,096			1,848			1,146
Plant and equipment (Note 4)	38,859			29,069
Mineral properties (Note 4)	92,625			91,031
Intangible assets	6,097			9,117
Restricted cash (Note 5)	21,573			12,980
Plant and equipment, net							34,762			37,582
Mineral properties, net							83,539			92,625
Intangible assets, net							2,707			5,799
Restricted cash							22,807			23,175
Total assets	$	206,332		$	192,280		$	188,296		$	196,457

LIABILITIES & EQUITY

Current liabilities
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	$	8,698		$	9,274		$	5,075		$	5,756
Current portion of asset retirement obligation (Note 5)	360			1,000
Current portion of loans and borrowings (Note 6)	6,399			3,582
Current portion of asset retirement obligation							32			32
Current portion of loans and borrowings							3,318			6,319
Total current liabilities	15,457			13,856			8,425			12,107
Warrant liabilities (Note 7)	3,663			262
Warrant liabilities							3,153			3,912
Deferred revenue	2,407			2,165			2,416			2,339
Asset retirement obligation (Note 5)	12,889			7,573
Loans and borrowings (Note 6)	24,559			28,937
Asset retirement obligation							17,150			17,001
Loans and borrowings							25,134			23,235
Total liabilities	58,975			52,793			56,278			58,594
Equity
Share capital (Note 7) Common shares, without par value, unlimited shares authorized; shares issued and outstanding 66,205,153 at September 30, 2016 and 46,519,132 at December 31, 2015	410,241			373,934
Share capital Common shares, without par value, unlimited shares authorized; shares issued and outstanding 70,566,637 at June 30, 2017 and 66,205,153 at December 31, 2016							421,952			412,334
Accumulated deficit	(269,400		)	(242,108		)	(296,499		)	(281,521		)
Accumulated other comprehensive income	2,582			3,505			2,556			3,308
Total shareholders' equity	143,423			135,331			128,009			134,121
Non-controlling interests	3,934			4,156			4,009			3,742
Total equity	147,357			139,487			132,018			137,863
Total liabilities and equity	$	206,332		$	192,280		$	188,296		$	196,457

Commitments and contingencies (Note 11)
Commitments and contingencies (Note 12)

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

ENERGY FUELS INC.

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity

(unaudited)(Expressed in thousands of US dollars, except share amounts)

Common Stock Deficit
Accumulated
other
comprehensive
income

Total
shareholders'
equity

Non-controlling
interests
Total equity
Shares Amount
Balance at December 31, 2015 46,519,132
$ 373,934
$ (242,108 ) $ 3,505
$ 135,331
$ 4,156
$ 139,487
Net loss —
—
(27,292 ) —
(27,292 ) (259 ) (27,551 )
Other comprehensive income —
—
—
(923 ) (923 ) —
(923 )
Shares issued for cash by at-the-market offering (Note 7a) 200,225
539
—
—
539
—
539
Shares issued for public offering (Note 7b and 7e) 13,368,750
21,856
—
—
21,856
—
21,856
Share issuance cost —
(2,330 ) —
—
(2,330 ) —
(2,330 )
Share-based compensation (Note 9) —
1,688
—
—
1,688
—
1,688
Shares issued for exercise of stock options 8,369
18
—
—
18
—
18
Shares issued for the vesting of restricted stock units 138,608
—
—
—
—
—
—
Shares issued for acquisition of Alta Mesa (Note 7d) 4,551,284
11,378
—
—
11,378
—
11,378
Shares issued for acquisition of 40% interest in Roca Honda (Note 7c) 1,212,173
2,679
—
—
2,679
—
2,679
Shares issued for consulting services 206,612
479
—
—
479
—
479
Contributions attributable to non-controlling interest —
—
—
—
—
37
37
Balance at September 30, 2016 66,205,153
$ 410,241
$ (269,400 ) $ 2,582
$ 143,423
$ 3,934
$ 147,357



	Common Stock				Deficit			Accumulated other comprehensive income			Total shareholders' equity			Non-controlling interests			Total equity
	Shares	Amount			Deficit			Accumulated other comprehensive income			Total shareholders' equity			Non-controlling interests			Total equity
Balance at December 31, 2016	66,205,153	$	412,334		$	(281,521	)	$	3,308		$	134,121		$	3,742		$	137,863
Net loss	—	—			(14,978		)	—			(14,978		)	(98		)	(15,076		)
Other comprehensive income	—	—			—			(752		)	(752		)	—			(752		)
Shares issued for cash by at-the-market offering	3,402,292	7,687			—			—			7,687			—			7,687
Share issuance cost	—	(223		)	—			—			(223		)	—			(223		)
Share-based compensation	—	1,784			—			—			1,784			—			1,784
Shares issued for the vesting of restricted stock units	752,580	—			—			—			—			—			—
Shares issued for consulting services	206,612	370			—			—			370			—			370
Contributions attributable to non-controlling interest	—	—			—			—			—			365			365
Balance at June 30, 2017	70,566,637	$	421,952		$	(296,499	)	$	2,556		$	128,009		$	4,009		$	132,018

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

ENERGY FUELS INC.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(unaudited)(Expressed in thousands of US dollars)

For the nine months ended
September 30,
2016 2015
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net loss for the period $ (27,551 ) $ (10,658 )
Items not involving cash:
Depletion, depreciation and amortization 3,651
3,654
Stock-based compensation (Note 9) 1,688
810
Change in value of convertible debentures (Note 6) 666
890
Accretion of asset retirement obligation (Note 5) 526
350
Revision of asset retirement obligation (Note 5) 71
—
Unrealized foreign exchange losses (148 ) 919
Impairment of inventories 2,998
—
Impairment of assets held for sale —
2,000
Abandonment of mineral properties 1,036
—
Other non- cash (income) expenses (1,819 ) 2,975
Changes in assets and liabilities
(Increase) decrease in inventories 4,417
3,572
(Increase) decrease in trade and other receivables 2,221
106
(Increase) decrease in prepaid expenses and other assets 476
(205 )
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and accrued liabilities (1,063 ) 284
Changes in deferred revenue 242
318
Cash paid for reclamation and remediation activities (Note 5) (1,376 ) (239 )
(13,965 ) 4,776
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Purchase of mineral properties and property, plant and equipment (64 ) (4,616 )
Acquisition of Uranerz Energy Corporation, net of cash acquired —
2,457
Acquisition of Alta Mesa, net of cash acquired (1,290 ) —
Acquisition of Roca Honda, net of cash acquired 101
—
Change in cash deposited with regulatory agencies for asset retirement obligations (Note 5) (4,115 ) 5,267
Sale of mineral properties held for sale 845
—
(4,523 ) 3,108
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Issuance of common shares for cash 25,291
3
Option and warrant exercises 18
184
Repayment of loans and borrowings (2,391 ) (784 )
Cash received from non-controlling interest 37
187
22,955
(410 )

INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS DURING THE PERIOD 4,467
7,474
Effect of exchange rate fluctuations on cash held in foreign currencies 98
(144 )
Cash and cash equivalents - beginning of period 12,965
10,411
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS - END OF PERIOD $ 17,530
$ 17,741
Non-cash investing and financing transactions:

Issuance of secured notes for acquisition of mineral properties —
446
Issuance of common shares, options and warrants for acquisition of Uranerz Energy Corporation —
110,268



~~Issuance of common shares for acquisition of Alta Mesa (Note 7d)~~	~~11,378~~	—
~~Issuance of common shares for acquisition of 40% interest in Roca Honda (Note 7c)~~	~~2,679~~	—
~~Issuance of common shares for consulting services~~	~~479~~	—



	For the six months ended
	June 30,
	2017			2016
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net loss for the period	$	(15,076	)	$	(19,306	)
Items not involving cash:
Depletion, depreciation and amortization	3,688			2,591
Stock-based compensation	1,784			1,112
Change in value of convertible debentures	775			989
Change in value of warrant liabilities	(845		)	—
Accretion of asset retirement obligation	691			351
Unrealized foreign exchange (gains) losses	(182		)	337
Impairment of inventories	1,957			1,619
Abandonment of mineral properties	287			31
Impairment of mineral properties held for sale	3,599			—
Other non-cash (income) expenses	744			(1,165		)
Changes in assets and liabilities
Decrease in inventories	3,683			7,681
(Increase) decrease in trade and other receivables	(3,124		)	2,206
Decrease in prepaid expenses and other assets	226			508
Decrease in accounts payable and accrued liabilities	(1,727		)	(2,715		)
Changes in deferred revenue	77			257
Cash paid for reclamation and remediation activities	(542		)	(698		)
	(3,985		)	(6,202		)
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Purchase of plant and equipment	—			(42		)
Acquisition of Alta Mesa, net of cash acquired	—			(1,290		)
Acquisition of Roca Honda, net of cash acquired	—			101
Change in cash deposited with regulatory agencies for asset retirement obligations	386			(2,147		)
Sale of mineral properties held for sale	—			845
	386			(2,533		)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Issuance of common shares for cash	7,464			11,503
Option and warrant exercises	—			3
Repayment of loans and borrowings	(2,460		)	(1,606		)
Cash received from non-controlling interest	365			—
	5,369			9,900

CHANGE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS DURING THE PERIOD	1,770			1,165
Effect of exchange rate fluctuations on cash held in foreign currencies	50			286
Cash and cash equivalents - beginning of period	16,901			12,965
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS - END OF PERIOD	$	18,721		$	14,416

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Net cash paid during the period for:
Interest	$	1,045		$	1,161

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

ENERGY FUELS INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE ~~NINE~~SIX MONTHS ENDED ~~SEPTEMBER~~JUNE 30, ~~2016~~2017

(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of US Dollars except share and per share amounts)


1.	THE COMPANY AND DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

Energy Fuels Inc. was incorporated under the laws of the Province of Alberta (Canada) and was continued under the Business Corporations Act (Ontario, Canada).

Energy Fuels Inc. and its subsidiary companies (collectively “the Company” or “EFI”) are engaged in uranium extraction, recovery and sales of uranium from mineral properties and the recycling of uranium bearing materials generated by third parties. As a part of these activities the Company also acquires, explores, evaluates and, if warranted, permits uranium properties. The Company’s final uranium product, uranium oxide concentrates (“U3O8” or “uranium concentrates”), is sold to customers for further processing into fuel for nuclear reactors.

The Company is an exploration stage mining company as defined by the SEC in Industry Guide 7 (“SEC Industry Guide 7”) as it has not established the existence of proven or probable reserves on any of its properties.


2.	BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“US GAAP”) and are presented in thousands of US dollars (“USD”) except per share amounts. ~~The functional currency of Energy Fuels, Inc. is the Canadian dollar.~~ Certain footnote disclosures have share prices which are presented in Canadian dollars (“Cdn$”).

The interim consolidated financial statements included herein have been prepared by the Company, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC. Certain information and note disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with US GAAP have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations, although the Company believes that the disclosures included are adequate to make the information presented not misleading.

In management’s opinion, these unaudited interim financial statements reflect all adjustments, consisting solely of normal recurring items, which are necessary for the fair presentation of the Company’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows on a basis consistent with that of the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, ~~2015.~~2016. However, the results of operations for the interim periods may not be indicative of results to be expected for the full fiscal year. ~~Therefore these~~These unaudited interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and notes thereto and summary of significant accounting policies included in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2015.~~2016.

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries. All inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated.

~~Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements~~

~~Fair value measurement~~

In May 2015, ASU No. 2015-07 was issued related to investments for which fair value is measured, or are eligible to be measured, using the net asset value per share practical expedient. This update removes the requirement to categorize within the fair value hierarchy all investments for which fair value is measured using the net asset value per share practical expedient. The amendment also removes certain disclosure requirements for these investments. This update was effective in fiscal years, including interim periods, beginning after December 15, 2015. Adoption of this guidance effective January 1, 2016 had no impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements.

~~Debt issuance costs~~

In April 2015, ASU No. 2015-03 was issued related to debt issuance costs. This update simplifies the presentation of debt issuance costs by requiring debt issuance costs to be presented as a deduction from the corresponding debt liability. The update was effective in fiscal years, including interim periods, beginning after December 15, 2015. Adoption of this guidance effective January 1, 2016 had no impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements.

~~Consolidations~~

In February 2015, ASU No. 2015-02 was issued related to consolidations. This update makes some targeted changes to current consolidation guidance and impacts both the voting and the variable interest consolidation models. In particular, the update changes

how companies determine whether limited partnerships or similar entities are variable interest entities. The update was effective in fiscal years, including interim periods, beginning after December 15, 2015. The adoption of this guidance effective January 1, 2016 had no impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements or disclosures.

~~Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements not yet adopted~~

In addition to the new and revised standards and amendments issued prior to 2016 for which the Company is evaluating implementation effects, as disclosed in our annual Consolidated financial statements, the FASB issued the following new and revised standards and amendments, which are not yet effective which may have future applicability to the Company:

~~Investments~~

In January 2016, ASU No. 2016-01 was issued related to financial instruments. The new guidance requires entities to measure equity investments that do not result in consolidation and are not accounted for under the equity method at fair value and recognize any changes in fair value in net income. This new guidance also updates certain disclosure requirements for these investments. This update is effective in fiscal years, including interim periods, beginning after December 15, 2017, and early adoption is not permitted. The Company is currently evaluating this guidance and the impact it will have on the financial statements.

~~Leases~~

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02 which core principle is that a lessee should recognize the assets and the liabilities that arise from leases, including operating leases. Under the new requirements, a lessee will recognize in the balance sheet a liability to make lease payments (the lease liability) and the right-of-use asset representing the right to the underlying asset for the lease term. For leases with a term of twelve months or less, the lessee is permitted to make an accounting policy election by class of underlying asset not to recognize lease assets and lease liabilities. The recognition, measurement, and presentation of expenses and cash flows arising from a lease by a lessee have not significantly changed from the previous GAAP. The standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within such fiscal year, with early adoption permitted. The ASU requires a modified retrospective transition method with the option to elect a package of practical expedients. The Company is evaluating the effect of this amendment and the impact it will have on the Company’s financial statements.

~~Going Concern~~

In August 2014, ASU 2014-15 guidance was issued which provides guidance about management’s responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern and to provide related footnote disclosures. The amendments require management to assess an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern by incorporating and expanding upon certain principles that are currently in US auditing standards. Specifically, the amendments (1) provide a definition of the term substantial doubt, (2) require an evaluation every reporting period including interim periods, (3) provide principles for considering the mitigating effect of management’s plans, (4) require certain disclosures when substantial doubt is alleviated as a result of consideration of management’s plans, (5) require an express statement and other disclosures when substantial doubt is not alleviated, and (6) require an assessment for a period of one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or available to be issued). The amendments in this update shall be effective for annual periods ending after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, with early application permitted. The Company is currently evaluating this guidance and the impact on the Company’s financial statements.

~~Financial instruments~~

In January 2016, ASU 2016-01 was issued related to financial instruments. The update intends to enhance the reporting model for financial instruments to provide users of financial instruments with more decision-useful information and addresses certain aspects of the recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of financial instruments. The update is effective in fiscal years, including interim periods beginning on or after December 15, 2017. The Company is currently evaluating this guidance and the impact it will have on the financial statements.


3.	INVENTORIES


	September 30, 2016		December 31, 2015		June 30, 2017		December 31, 2016
Concentrates and work-in-progress ~~(a)~~	$	20,204	$	19,900	$	10,563	$	13,788
Inventory of ore in stockpiles	3,129		7,767
Raw materials and consumables	3,422		3,004		2,783		2,973
	$	26,755	$	30,671	$	13,346	$	16,761


~~(a)~~	During the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2016, the Company recorded an impairment loss of $1.38 million and $3.00 million, respectively in profit and loss related to concentrates and work in progress inventories in the ISR segment.


4.	PLANT AND EQUIPMENT AND MINERAL PROPERTIES

The following is a summary of plant and equipment:


	September 30, 2016							December 31, 2015							June 30, 2017							December 31, 2016
	Cost		Accumulated Depreciation			Net Book Value		Cost		Accumulated Depreciation			Net Book Value		Cost		Accumulated Depreciation			Net Book Value		Cost		Accumulated Depreciation			Net Book Value
Plant and equipment
Nichols Ranch	$	29,210	$	(5,693	)	$	23,517	$	29,210	$	(2,370	)	$	26,840	$	29,210	$	(8,946	)	$	20,264	$	29,210	$	(6,804	)	$	22,406
Alta Mesa	13,680		(228		)	13,452		—		—			—		13,626		(923		)	12,703		13,626		(456		)	13,170
Equipment and other	13,171		(11,281		)	1,890		13,107		(10,878		)	2,229		13,367		(11,572		)	1,795		13,367		(11,361		)	2,006
Plant and equipment total	$	56,061	$	(17,202	)	$	38,859	$	42,317	$	(13,248	)	$	29,069	$	56,203	$	(21,441	)	$	34,762	$	56,203	$	(18,621	)	$	37,582

The following is a summary of mineral properties:


	September 30, 2016		December 31, 2015		June 30, 2017		December 31, 2016
Mineral properties
In-situ recovery ("ISR")
Uranerz ISR properties	$	35,060	$	36,096
Uranerz ISR properties (a,b)					$	25,974	$	35,060
In-situ recovery total	$	35,060	$	36,096	25,974		35,060
Conventional
Sheep Mountain	34,183		34,183		34,183		34,183
Roca Honda ~~(a)~~	22,095		19,465		22,095		22,095
Other	1,287		1,287		1,287		1,287
Conventional total	57,565		54,935		57,565		57,565
Mineral properties total	$	92,625	$	91,031	$	83,539	$	92,625

~~On May 27, 2016,~~In the three months ended June 30, 2017, the Company ~~issued 1,212,173 shares to acquire~~has identified a buyer for a property in the ~~remaining 40% interest~~ISR segment. The sale of the ~~Roca Honda project~~property is expected to be completed in the 2nd half of 2017. The Company reclassified the property as mineral properties held for ~~consideration~~sale, evaluated its fair value and recorded an impairment charge of ~~$2.63~~$3.60 million (June 30, 2016 - Nil).

In the three months and six months ended June 30, 2017, the Company did not renew certain mineral leases and recorded abandonment expense of $0.04 million and ~~an additional $4.5~~$0.29 million, respectively, in ~~cash payable upon first commencement~~the statement of commercial mineral extraction. The acquisition was accounted for as a purchase of assets as Roca Honda does not meet the definition of a business under ASC Topic 805, Business Combinations because Roca Honda does not currently have the resources, both inputs and processes, to apply to the Roca Honda property in order to extract uranium.operations (June 30, 2016 - $Nil).

5. ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATIONS AND RESTRICTED CASH

The following table summarizes the Company’s asset retirement obligations:


	September 30, 2016			December 31, 2015			June 30, 2017			December 31, 2016
Asset retirement obligation, beginning of period	$	8,573		$	5,683		$	17,033		$	8,573
Revision of estimate	71			877			—			4,186
Acquired in asset acquisitions or business combinations	5,454			2,145			—			5,454
Accretion of liabilities	526			494			691			906
Settlements	(1,375		)	(626		)	(542		)	(2,086		)
Asset retirement obligation, end of period	$	13,249		$	8,573		$	17,182		$	17,033
Asset retirement obligation:
Current	$	360		$	1,000		$	32		$	32
Non-current	12,889			7,573			17,150			17,001
Asset retirement obligation, end of period	$	13,249		$	8,573		$	17,182		$	17,033

Revision of estimates is as a result of a change in estimates of the amount or timing of cash flows to settle asset retirement obligations. Changes to the asset retirement obligations are recorded in profit and loss.

The asset retirement obligations of the Company are subject to legal and regulatory requirements. Estimates of the costs of reclamation are reviewed periodically by the Company and the applicable regulatory authorities. The above provision represents the Company’s best estimate of the present value of future reclamation costs, discounted using credit adjusted risk-free interest rates ranging from 9.5% to 11.5% and an inflation rate of 2.0% (December 31, ~~2015~~2016 – 2.0%). The total undiscounted decommissioning liability at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017 is ~~$41.54~~$43.00 million (December 31, ~~2015~~2016 - ~~$32.30~~$43.00 million). Reclamation costs are expected to be incurred between ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2038~~2039 in the following manner: ~~2016~~2017 – ~~2020~~2021 - ~~$5.19~~$8.21 million, ~~2021~~2022 – ~~2025~~2026 - ~~$9.41~~$11.22 million, ~~2026~~2027 – ~~2030~~2031 - ~~$2.69~~$3.65 million, ~~2031~~2032 – ~~2035~~2036 - ~~$8.17~~$11.95 million, ~~2036~~2037 – ~~2038~~2039 - ~~$16.08~~$7.97 million.

The following table summarizes the Company’s restricted cash:


	September 30, 2016		December 31, 2015			June 30, 2017			December 31, 2016
Restricted cash, beginning of period	$	12,980	$	16,148		$	23,175		$	12,980
Restricted cash from acquisitions	4,478		2,100			—			4,532
Refunds of collateral	—		(5,268		)
Additional collateral posted	4,115		—			—			5,663
Release of collateral related to change in surety agents						(13,111		)	—
Posting of collateral with new surety agents						12,743			—
Restricted cash, end of period	$	21,573	$	12,980		$	22,807		$	23,175

The Company has cash, cash equivalents and fixed income securities as collateral for various bonds posted in favor of the State of Utah, the State of Wyoming, the applicable state regulatory agencies in Colorado and Arizona and the U.S. Bureau of Land Management for estimated reclamation costs associated with the White Mesa Mill, Nichols Ranch, Alta Mesa and mining properties. Cash equivalents are short-term highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less. The restricted cash will be released when the Company has reclaimed a mineral property or restructured the surety and collateral arrangements. See Note 1112 for a discussion of the Company’s surety bond commitments.


6.	LOANS AND BORROWINGS

The contractual terms of the Company’s interest-bearing loans and borrowings, which are measured at amortized cost, and the Company’s convertible debentures which are measured at fair value, are as follows.


	September 30, 2016		December 31, 2015		June 30, 2017		December 31, 2016
Current portion of loans and borrowings:
Convertible debentures (a)	$	3,220	$	—	$	—	$	3,095
Secured note (b)	—		250
Wyoming Industrial Development Revenue Bond loan (c)	3,179		3,291
Finance leases and other	—		41
Wyoming Industrial Development Revenue Bond loan (b)					3,318		3,224
Total current loans and borrowings	$	6,399	$	3,582	$	3,318	$	6,319
Long-term loans and borrowings:
Convertible debentures (a)	$	12,881	$	14,624	$	15,962	$	12,381
Secured note (b)	—		224
Wyoming Industrial Development Revenue Bond loan (c)	11,678		14,078
Finance leases and other	—		11
Wyoming Industrial Development Revenue Bond loan (b)					9,172		10,854
Total long-term loans and borrowings	$	24,559	$	28,937	$	25,134	$	23,235

(a)

On July 24, 2012, the Company completed a bought deal public offering of 22,000 floating-rate convertible unsecured subordinated debentures originally maturing June 30, 2017 (the “Debentures”) at a price of Cdn$1,000 per Debenture for gross proceeds of Cdn$21.55 million (the “Offering”). The Debentures are convertible into Common Shares at the option of the holder. Interest is paid in cash and in addition, unless an event of default has occurred and is continuing, the Company may elect, from time to time, subject to applicable regulatory approval, to satisfy its obligation to pay interest on the Debentures, on the date it is payable under the indenture: (i) in cash; (ii) by delivering sufficient common shares to the debenture trustee, for sale, to satisfy the interest obligations in accordance with the indenture in which event holders of the Debentures will be entitled to receive a cash payment equal to the proceeds of the sale of such common shares; or (iii) any combination of (i) and (ii).

On August 4, 2016, the Company, by a vote of the Debentureholders, extended the maturity date of the Debentures from June 30, 2017 to December 31, 2020, and reduced the conversion price of the Debentures from Cdn$15.00 to Cdn$4.15 per Common Share of the Company. In addition, a redemption provision was added that will enable the Company, upon giving not less than 30 days notice to Debentureholders, to redeem the Debentures, for cash, in whole or in part at any time after June 30, 2019, but prior to maturity, at a price of 101% of the aggregate principal amount redeemed, plus accrued and unpaid interest (less any tax required by law to be deducted) on such Debentures up to but excluding the redemption date. A right (in favor of each Debentureholder) was also added ~~to give~~which gave the Debentureholders the option to require the Company to purchase, for cash, on the previous maturity date of June 30, 2017, up to 20% of the Debentures held by the Debentureholders at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount purchased plus accrued and unpaid interest (less any tax required by law to be deducted). In the three months ended June 30, 2017, Debentureholders elected to redeem Cdn$1.13 million ($0.87 million) under this right. No additional purchases are allowed under this right. In addition, certain other amendments were made to the Indenture, as required by the U.S. Trust Indenture Act of 1939, as amended, and with respect to the addition of a U.S. Trustee in compliance therewith, as well as to remove provisions of the Indenture that no longer apply, such as U.S. securities law restrictions.

The Debentures accrue interest, payable semi-annually in arrears on June 30 and December 31 of each year at a fluctuating rate of not less than 8.5% and not more than 13.5%, indexed to the simple average spot price of uranium as reported on the UxC Weekly Indicator Price. The Debentures may be redeemed in whole or part, at par plus accrued interest and unpaid interest by the Company between June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2020 subject to certain terms and conditions, provided the volume weighted average trading price of the common shares of the Company on the Toronto Stock Exchange ("TSX") during the 20 consecutive trading days ending five days preceding the date on which the notice of redemption is given is not less than 125% of the conversion price.

Upon redemption or at maturity, the Company will repay the indebtedness represented by the Debentures by paying to the debenture trustee in Canadian dollars an amount equal to the aggregate principal amount of the outstanding Debentures which are to be redeemed or which have matured, as applicable, together with accrued and unpaid interest thereon.

Subject to any required regulatory approval and provided no event of default has occurred and is continuing, the Company has the option to satisfy its obligation to repay the Cdn$1,000 principal amount of the Debentures, in whole or in part, due at redemption or maturity, upon at least 40 days’ and not more than 60 days’ prior notice,

by delivering that number of common shares obtained by dividing the Cdn$1,000 principal amount of the Debentures maturing or to be redeemed as applicable, by 95% of the volume-weighted average trading price of

the common shares on the TSX during the 20 consecutive trading days ending five trading days preceding the date fixed for redemption or the maturity date, as the case may be.

In accordance with the revised terms approved on August 4, 2016, the Company ~~has~~had classified 20% of the principal amount of the ~~debenture~~Debenture as a current ~~liability. The debentures~~liability at December 31, 2016. Upon expiration of the option at June 30, 2017, the Company reclassified the amount not redeemed as a long term liability.The Debentures are classified as fair value through profit or loss where the ~~debentures~~Debentures are measured at fair value based on the closing price on the TSX (a level 1 measurement) and changes are recognized in earnings. For the ~~nine~~three month and six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017 the Company recorded a loss on revaluation of convertible ~~debentures~~Debentures of ~~$0.67~~$0.15 million ~~(September~~and $0.78 million respectively (June 30, ~~2015~~2016 – ~~$0.87~~$0.43 million and $0.99 million).

(b)

In February 2015 the Company issued a secured note in the amount of $0.45 million for a 50% interest in a joint venture with an effective interest rate of 7%. In February 2016 the Company amended the terms of the note to include a one-time payment of $0.05 million on February 13, 2016 and a payment of $0.45 million due on the date on which ore from the Wate Project is successfully processed through a mill into uranium concentrates.

~~(c)~~

The Company, upon its acquisition of Uranerz in 2015, assumed a loan through the Wyoming Industrial Development Revenue Bond program (the "Loan"). The Loan has an annual interest rate of 5.75% and is repayable over seven years, maturing on October 15, 2020. The Loan originated on December 3, 2013 and required the payment of interest only for the first year, with the amortization of principal plus interest over the remaining six years. The Loan can be repaid earlier than its maturity date if the Company so chooses without penalty or premium. The Loan is secured by most of the assets of the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary, Uranerz, including mineral properties, the processing facility, and equipment as well as an assignment of all of Uranerz’ rights, title and interest in and to its product sales contracts and other agreements. Uranerz is also subject to dividend restrictions. Principal and interest are paid on a quarterly basis on the first day of January, April, July and October. At ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017 the loan had an outstanding balance of ~~$14.86~~$12.49 million of which the current portion of the note was ~~$3.18~~$3.32 million.


7.	CAPITAL STOCK

Authorized capital stock

The Company is authorized to issue an unlimited number of Common Shares without par value, unlimited Preferred Shares issuable in series, and unlimited Series A Preferred Shares. The Series A Preferred shares issuable are non-redeemable, non-callable, non-voting and with no right to dividends. The Preferred Shares issuable in series will have the rights, privileges, restrictions and conditions assigned to the particular series upon the Board of Directors approving their issuance.

Issued capital stock

~~The significant transactions relating to capital stock issued for~~In the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016 are:~~


a)	~~In the nine months ended September 30, 2016, The Company issued 200,225 Common Shares under the Company’s “at-the-market” offering (the “ATM”) for proceeds of $0.54 million.~~

On March 14, 2016, the Company completed a public offering of 5,031,250 units at a price of $2.40 per unit for gross proceeds of $12.08 million. Each Unit consisted of one Common Share and one half of one Common Share purchase warrant, or a total of 5,031,250 Common Shares and 2,515,625 warrants. Each warrant is exercisable until March 14, 2019 and entitles the holder thereof to acquire one Common Share upon exercise at an exercise price of US$3.20 per share. These warrants are accounted for as a derivative liability, as the functional currency of the entity issuing the warrant is Cdn$.

2017, The ~~following weighted average assumptions were used~~Company issued 3,402,292 Common Shares under the Company’s “at-the-market” offering (the “ATM”) for ~~the Black-Scholes option pricing model to calculate the $2.09 million~~net proceeds of ~~fair value for the 2,515,625 warrants issued in connection with the public offering in March 2016.~~$7.46 million.



~~Risk-free rate~~	~~1.15%~~
~~Expected life~~	~~3.0 years~~
~~Expected volatility~~	106.0%*
~~Expected dividend yield~~	—%


*	~~Expected volatility is measured based on the Company’s historical share price volatility over the expected life of the warrants.~~


c)	~~On May 27, 2016, the Company issued 1,212,173 shares to acquire the remaining 40% interest of the Roca Honda Joint Venture for share consideration of $2.68 million.~~


d)	~~On June 16, 2016 the Company issued 4,551,284 shares to acquire Alta Mesa with value of $11.38 million.~~

On September 20, 2016, the Company completed a public offering of 8,337,500 units at a price of $1.80 per unit for gross proceeds of $13.79 million. Each Unit consisted of one Common Share and one half of one Common Share purchase warrant, or a total of 8,337,500 Shares and 4,168,750 Warrants. Each warrant is exercisable until September 20, 2021 and entitles the holder thereof to acquire one Share upon exercise at an exercise price of US$2.45 per share. These warrants are accounted for as a derivative liability, as the functional currency of the entity issuing the warrant is Cdn$.

The following weighted average assumptions were used for the Black-Scholes option pricing model to calculate the $3.17 million of fair value for the 4,168,750 warrants issued in connection with the public offering in September 2016.



~~Risk-free rate~~	~~1.2%~~
~~Expected life~~	~~5.0 years~~
~~Expected volatility~~	145.2%*
~~Expected dividend yield~~	—%


*	~~Expected volatility is measured based on the Company’s historical share price volatility over the expected life of the warrants.~~

Share Purchase Warrants

The Company ~~has~~had share purchase warrants denominated in Canadian dollars and US dollars. There are a total of 0.35 million warrants with an exercise price of Cdn$13.25 and 0.46 million warrants with an exercise price of Cdn$9.50 expired unexercised in June 2017. All remaining warrants are denominated in US dollars.

The following table summarizes the Company’s share purchase warrants denominated in ~~Cdn$:~~

Month Issued Expiry Date
Exercise Price
Cdn$

Warrants
Outstanding
June 2012(1) June 22, 2017 13.25 351,025
June 2013(1) June 15, 2017 9.50 456,948


~~(1)~~	~~The expiration date for these warrants was extended by one year on March 24, 2016.~~

~~The following table summarizes the Company’s share purchase warrants denominated in USD.~~US dollars. These warrants are accounted for as derivative liabilities as the functional currency of the entity issuing the warrants is ~~Cdn$.~~Canadian dollars.

Month Issued Expiry Date
Exercise Price
USD$

Warrants
Outstanding
Fair value at
September 30, 2016
June 2015 January 25, 2017 6.28
1,224,000
—
March 2016 March 14, 2019 3.20
2,515,625
737
September 2016 September 20, 2021 2.45
4,168,750
2,926
$ 3,663



Month Issued	Expiry Date	Exercise Price USD$	Warrants Outstanding	Fair value at June 30, 2017
March 2016 (a)	March 14, 2019	3.20	2,515,625	$	615
September 2016 (b)	September 20, 2021	2.45	4,168,750	2,538
				$	3,153

(a) The US dollar based warrants issued in March 2016 are classified as Level 2 under the fair value hierarchy (Note ~~13)~~15).

(b) The warrants issued in September 2016 are classified as Level 1 under the fair value hierarchy (Note 15).

The following weighted average assumptions were used for the Black-Scholes option pricing model to calculate the ~~less than $0.01 million of fair value for the 1,224,000 warrants at September 30, 2016.~~



~~Risk-free rate~~	~~0.29%~~
~~Expected life~~	~~0.3 years~~
~~Expected volatility~~	33.3%*
~~Expected dividend yield~~	—%

~~The following weighted average assumptions were used for the Black-Scholes option pricing model to calculate the $0.74~~$0.62 million of fair value for the 2,515,625 warrants at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016.~~2017.



Risk-free rate	~~0.88%~~1.31%
Expected life	~~2.5~~1.7 years
Expected volatility	~~97.6%~~89.55%*
Expected dividend yield	—%

~~The following weighted average assumptions were used for the Black-Scholes option pricing model to calculate the $2.93 million of fair value for the 4,168,750 warrants at September 30, 2016.~~



~~Risk-free rate~~	~~1.14%~~
~~Expected life~~	~~5.0 years~~
~~Expected volatility~~	147.11%*
~~Expected dividend yield~~	—%0.00%


*	Expected volatility is measured based on the Company’s historical share price volatility over the expected life of the warrants.


8.	BASIC AND DILUTED LOSS PER COMMON SHARE

Basic and diluted loss per share

The calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share after adjustment for the effects of all potential dilutive common shares, calculated as follows:


	Three months ended September 30,						Nine months ended September 30,						Three months ended June 30,						Six months ended June 30,
	2016			2015			2016			2015			2017			2016			2017			2016
Loss attributable to shareholders	$	(8,076	)	$	(5,344	)	$	(27,292	)	$	(10,607	)	$	(4,470	)	$	(10,408	)	$	(14,978	)	$	(19,216	)
Basic and diluted weighted average number
of common shares outstanding	58,630,457			45,117,145			53,161,608			29,358,102			70,423,642			53,043,512			69,597,088			50,282,647
Loss per common share	$	(0.14	)	$	(0.12	)	$	(0.51	)	$	(0.36	)	$	(0.06	)	$	(0.20	)	$	(0.22	)	$	(0.38	)

For the three and ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, 2017, 9.10 million (June 30, 2016 ~~10.90 million (2015~~ - ~~6.24~~6.76 million) options and warrants and the potential conversion of the Debentures have been excluded from the calculation as their effect would have been anti-dilutive.


9.	SHARE-BASED PAYMENTS

The Company, under the 2015 Omnibus Equity Incentive Compensation Plan (the “Compensation Plan”), maintains a stock incentive plan for directors, executives, eligible employees and consultants. Stock incentive awards include employee stock options and restricted stock units (“RSUs”). The Company issues new shares of common stock to satisfy exercises and vesting under all of its stock incentive awards. At ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, a total of ~~6,620,515~~7,912,149 Common Shares were authorized for stock incentive plan awards.

Employee Stock Options

The Company, under the Compensation Plan may grant options to directors, executives, employees and consultants to purchase Common Shares of the Company. The exercise price of the options is set as the higher of the Company’s closing share price on the day before the grant date or the five-day volume weighted average price. Stock options granted under the Compensation Plan generally vest over a period of two years or more and are generally exercisable over a period of five years from the grant date not to exceed 10 years. The value of each option award is estimated at the grant date using the Black-Scholes Option Valuation Model. There were ~~0.45~~0.73 million options granted in the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, 2017 (six months ended June 30, 2016 ~~(nine months ended September 30, 2015~~ – ~~2.17 million)~~0.42 million options). At ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, there were ~~2.18~~2.41 million options outstanding with ~~1.94~~1.97 million options exercisable, at a weighted average exercise price of ~~$5.81~~$4.59 and ~~$6.21,~~$5.10 respectively, with a weighted average remaining contractual life of ~~3.72~~3.86 years. The aggregate intrinsic value of the fully vested ~~shares~~options was $nil.

The fair value of the options granted under the Compensation Plan for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017 was estimated at the date of grant, using the Black-Scholes Option Valuation Model, with the following weighted-average assumptions:



Risk-free interest rate	~~1.03% - 1.43%~~1.93%
Expected life	5.0 years	*
Expected volatility	64.7% -74.8%*62.95%
Expected dividend yield	—%0.00%
Weighted-average expected life of option	5.00
Weighted-average grant date fair value	$~~1.22 - $1.23~~1.19


*	Expected volatility is measured based on the Company’s historical share price volatility over a period equivalent to the expected life of the options.

The summary of the Company’s stock options at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017 and December 31, ~~2015,~~2016, and the changes for the fiscal periods ending on those dates is presented below:


	Nine Months ended				Year ended				Range of Exercise Prices $	Weighted Average Exercise Price $	Number of Options
	September 30, 2016				December 31, 2015
	Range of Exercise Prices $	Weighted Average Exercise Price $	Number of Options		Range of Exercise Prices $	Weighted Average Exercise Price $	Number of Options
Balance, beginning of period	2.55 - 32.10	6.54	2,122,897		6.55 - 38.12	10.05	905,413
Transactions during the period:
Balance, December 31, 2015									2.55 - 32.10	6.54	2,122,897
Granted	2.12 - 2.22	2.13	449,540		2.55 - 18.55	6.02	2,176,330		2.12 - 2.22	2.13	449,537
Exercised	2.12	2.12	(8,369	)	2.55 - 4.48	3.78	(48,802	)	2.12	2.12	(8,369	)
Forfeited	2.12 - 19.44	5.95	(272,528	)	4.44 - 29.71	7.29	(574,486	)	2.12 - 18.99	5.52	(317,960	)
Expired	2.95 - 32.78	8.02	(106,562	)	7.47 - 32.10	7.42	(335,558	)	2.95 - 32.03	8.03	(200,962	)
Balance, end of period	2.12 - 15.61	5.81	2,184,978		2.55 - 32.10	6.54	2,122,897
Balance, December 31, 2016									2.12 - 15.61	5.69	2,045,143
Granted									2.35	2.35	732,328
Exercised									—	—	—
Forfeited									2.12 - 11.94	3.38	(93,077	)
Expired									4.48 - 12.55	7.88	(270,980	)
Balance, June 30, 2017									2.12 - 15.61	4.59	2,413,414

A summary of the status and activity of non-vested stock options for the six months ended June 30, 2017 is as follows:



	Number of shares		Weighted Average Grant- Date Fair Value
Non-vested December 31, 2016	227,178		$	1.48
Granted	732,328		1.19
Vested	(483,104	)	1.31
Forfeited	(33,201	)	1.26
Non-vested June 30, 2017	443,201		$	1.21

Restricted Stock Units

The Company grants ~~RSUs~~restricted stock units ("RSUs") to executives and eligible employees. Awards are determined as a target percentage of base salary and generally vest over periods of ~~three~~3 years. Prior to vesting, holders of restricted stock units do not have the right to vote the underlying shares. The restricted stock units are subject to forfeiture risk and other restrictions. Upon vesting, the employee is entitled to receive one share of the Company’s common stock for each restricted stock unit for no additional payment. During the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, the ~~Company’s~~Company's Board of Directors approved the issuance of ~~1.21~~1.13 million RSUs under the Compensation Plan ~~(2015 – 0.27~~(June 30, 2016 - 0.95 million).

A summary of the status and activity of non-vested ~~stock options and~~ RSUs at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017 is as follows:


	Stock-option				RSU				RSU
	Number of shares		Weighted Average Grant- Date Fair Value		Number of shares		Weighted Average Grant- Date Fair Value		Number of shares		Weighted Average Grant- Date Fair Value
Non-vested December 31, 2015	177,698		$	3.44	272,866		$	4.03
Non-vested December 31, 2016									1,330,469		$	2.37
Granted	449,540		1.29		1,205,336		2.14		1,131,760		2.51
Vested	(357,634	)	2.15		(138,608	)	4.65		(752,580	)	2.35
Forfeited	(28,045	)	2.08		(9,125	)	5.39		(33,019	)	2.12
Non-vested September 30, 2016	241,559		$	1.50	1,330,469		$	2.37
Non-vested June 30, 2017									1,676,630		$	2.48

The total intrinsic value and fair value of RSUs that vested and were settled for equity in the ~~three months and nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, 2017 was $1.64 million (June 30, 2016 – $0.30 million).

The share-based compensation recorded during the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 was ~~$nil (2015 – $nil)~~$0.74 million and ~~$0.30~~$1.78 million, ~~(2015 – $nil), respectively.~~respectively (June 30, 2016 - $1.11 million).

At ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, there was ~~$0.14~~$0.28 million and ~~$1.36~~$2.47 million of unrecognized compensation costs related to the unvested stock options and RSU awards, respectively. This cost is expected to be recognized over a period of approximately two years.


10.	INCOME TAXES

InAs of June 30, 2017, the ~~nine~~Company does not believe it is more likely than not that the Company will fully realize the benefit of the deferred tax assets. As such, the Company increased the valuation allowance related to the deferred tax assets by $2.66 million for the six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017. The Company recognized a full valuation allowance against the ~~Company issued 8,369 shares upon exercise~~net deferred tax assets as of ~~stock options at an average exercise price of $2.12 for proceeds of less than $0.02 million. These options had an intrinsic value of less than $0.01 million.~~

~~The share-based compensation recorded during the three~~June 30, 2017, and ~~nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 is as follows:~~

Three months ended Nine months ended
September 30, September 30,
2016 2015 2016 2015
Share-based compensation $ 576
$ 22
$ 1,688
$ 810
Replacement of options from business combinations and asset acquisitions —
—
—
3,683
Value of stock options granted $ 576
$ 22
$ 1,688
$ 4,493

December 31, 2016.


~~10.~~11.	SUPPLEMENTAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION

~~The components of revenues are as follows:~~

Three months ended
September 30, Nine months ended
September 30,
2016 2015 2016 2015
Uranium concentrates $ 8,687
$ 19,159
$ 33,664
$ 49,795
Alternate feed materials processing and other 15
—
40
669
Revenues $ 8,702
$ 19,159
$ 33,704
$ 50,464

The components of other income (expense) are as follows:


	Three months ended September 30,					Nine months ended September 30,							Three months ended June 30,						Six months ended June 30,
	2016		2015			2016				2015			2017			2016			2017			2016
Interest income	$	36	$	21		$	76			$	60		$	32		$	20		$	61		$	40
Change in value of investments accounted at fair value	—		150			—				112			119			(69		)	618			—
Change in value of warrant liabilities	1,178		712			1,879			��	712			3,038			448			845			701
Change in value of convertible debentures	323		18			(666		)		(890		)	147			(428		)	(775		)	(989		)
Sale of surplus assets													345			—			1,138			—
Other	333		(63		)	814				379			(1		)	500			(124		)	481
Other income (expense)	$	1,870	$	838		$	2,103			$	373		$	3,680		$	471		$	1,763		$	233


~~11.~~12.	COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

General legal matters

White Mesa Mill

In November 2012, the Company was served with a Plaintiff’s Original Petition and Jury Demand in the District Court of Harris County, Texas, claiming unspecified damages from the disease and injuries resulting from mesothelioma from exposure to asbestos, which the Plaintiff claims was contributed to by being exposed to asbestos products and dust while working at the White Mesa Mill. The Company does not consider this claim to have any merit, and therefore does not believe it will materially affect ~~its~~our financial position, results of operations or cash flows. In January, 2013, the Company filed a Special Appearance challenging jurisdiction and certain other procedural matters relating to this claim. No other activity involving the Company on this matter has occurred since that date.

In January, 2013, the Ute Mountain Ute tribe filed a Petition to Intervene and Request for Agency Action challenging the Corrective Action Plan approved by the State of Utah Department of Environmental Quality (“UDEQ”) relating to nitrate contamination in the shallow aquifer at the White Mesa Mill site. This challenge is currently being evaluated, and may involve the appointment of

an administrative law judge to hear the matter. The Company does not consider this action to have any merit. If the petition is successful, the likely outcome would be a requirement to modify or replace the existing Corrective Action Plan. At this time, the Company does not believe any such modification or replacement would materially affect our financial position, results of operations or cash flows. However, the scope and costs of remediation under a revised or replacement Corrective Action Plan have not yet been determined and could be significant.

In April 2014, the Grand Canyon Trust filed a citizen suit in federal ~~district court~~District Court for alleged violations of the Clean Air Act at the White Mesa Mill. In October 2014, the plaintiffs were granted leave by the ~~court~~Court to add further purported violations to their April 2014 suit. The Complaint, as amended, alleges that radon from one of the Mill’s tailings impoundments exceeded the standard; that the mill is in violation of a requirement that only two tailings impoundments may be in operation at any one time; and that certain other violations related to the manner of measuring and reporting radon results from one of the tailings impoundments occurred in 2013. The Complaint asks the ~~court~~Court to impose injunctive relief, civil penalties of up to $38,000 per day per violation, costs of litigation including attorneys’ fees, and other relief. The Company believes the issues raised in the Complaint are being addressed through the proper regulatory channels and isthat we are currently in compliance with all applicable regulatory requirements relating to those matters. The Company intends to defend against all issues raised in the Complaint. Cross motions for summary ~~judgement have been fully briefed, and a hearing is set for~~judgment were heard by the District Court on November 17, ~~2016.~~2016, and the parties are awaiting the Court's decision.

Canyon Project

In March, 2013, the Center for Biological Diversity, the Grand Canyon Trust, the Sierra Club and the Havasupai Tribe (the “Canyon Plaintiffs”) filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona (the “District Court”) against the Forest Supervisor for the Kaibab National Forest and the ~~United States Forest Service (“USFS”)~~USFS seeking an order (a) declaring that the USFS failed to comply with environmental, mining, public land, and historic preservation laws in relation to our Canyon Project, (b) setting aside any approvals regarding exploration and mining operations at the Canyon Project, and (c) directing operations to cease at the Canyon Project and enjoining the USFS from allowing any further exploration or mining-related activities at the Canyon Project until the USFS fully complies with all applicable laws. In April 2013, the Plaintiffs filed a Motion for Preliminary Injunction, which was denied by the District Court in September, 2013. On April 7, 2015, the District Court issued its final ruling on the merits in favor of the Defendants and the Company and against the Canyon Plaintiffs on all counts. The Canyon Plaintiffs appealed the District Court’s ruling on the merits to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, and filed motions for an injunction pending appeal with the District Court. Those motions for an injunction pending appeal were denied by the District Court on May 26, 2015. Thereafter, Plaintiffs filed urgent motions for an injunction pending appeal with the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, which were denied on June 30, 2015. ~~Briefing on the appeal~~The hearing on the merits ~~is now complete, and a hearing is set for~~at the Court of Appeals was held on December 15, ~~2016.~~2016 and the parties are awaiting the Court's decision. If the Canyon Plaintiffs are successful on their appeal on the merits, the Company may be required to maintain the Canyon Project on standby pending resolution of the matter. Such a required prolonged stoppage of ~~shaft sinking and~~ mining activities could have a significant impact on our future operations.

Surety bonds

The Company has indemnified third-party companies to provide surety bonds as collateral for the Company’s ARO. The Company is obligated to replace this collateral in the event of a default, and is obligated to repay any reclamation or closure costs due. The Company currently has ~~$21.57~~$22.81 million posted against an undiscounted ARO of ~~$41.54~~$43.00 million ~~(September 2015~~(December 31, 2016 - ~~$12.98~~$23.18 million posted against undiscounted asset retirement obligation of ~~$31.85~~$43.00 million). One of the Company’s surety bond holders has requested additional collateral to be posted at the following intervals: $1.76 million to be funded by November 30, 2016, and $1.76 million to be funded by February 28, 2017.


~~12.~~13.	Related Party Transactions

On May 17, 2017, the Board of Directors of the Company appointed Robert W. Kirkwood and Benjamin Eshleman III to the Board of Directors of the Company.

Mr. Kirkwood is a principal of the Kirkwood Companies, including Kirkwood Oil and Gas LLC, Wesco Operating, Inc., and United Nuclear LLC (“United Nuclear”). United Nuclear, owns a 19% interest in the Company’s Arkose Mining Venture while the Company owns the remaining 81%. The Company acts as manager of the Arkose Mining Venture and has management and control over operations carried out by the Arkose Mining Venture. The Arkose Mining Venture is a contractual joint venture governed by a venture agreement dated as of January 15, 2008 entered into by Uranerz Energy Corporation (a subsidiary of the Company) and United Nuclear (the “Venture Agreement”).

United Nuclear contributed $0.34 million to the expenses of the Arkose Joint Venture based on the approved budget for the six months ended June 30, 2017.

Mr. Benjamin Eshleman III is President of Mesteña LLC, which became a shareholder of the Company through the Company’s acquisition of Mesteña Uranium, L.L.C (now Alta Mesa LLC) in June 2016 through the issuance of 4,551,284 common shares of the Company to the direction of the Sellers (of which 4,303,032 common shares of the Company are currently held by the Sellers). In connection with the Purchase Agreement, one of the Acquired Companies, Leoncito Project, L.L.C. entered into an Amended and Restated Uranium Testing Permit and Lease Option Agreement with Mesteña Unproven, Ltd., Jones Ranch Minerals Unproven, Ltd and Mesteña Proven, Ltd. (collectively the “Grantors”), which requires Leoncito Project, L.L.C., to make a payment in the amount of $0.60 million to the Grantors in June 2019 (of which up to 50% may be paid in common shares of the Company at the Company’s election). At June 30, 2017, the Company has accrued $0.20 million of this liability on the balance sheet. The Grantors are managed by Mesteña LLC.

Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, the Alta Mesa Properties held by the Acquired Companies are subject to a royalty of 3.125% of the value of the recovered U₃O₈ from the Alta Mesa Properties sold at a price of $65.00 per pound or less, 6.25% of the value of the recovered U₃O₈ from the Alta Mesa Properties sold at a price greater than $65.00 per pound and up to and including $95.00 per pound, and 7.5% of the value of the recovered U₃O₈ from the Alta Mesa Properties sold at a price greater than $95.00 per pound. The royalties are held by the Sellers, and Mr. Eshleman and his extended family hold all of the ownership interests in the Sellers. In addition, Mr. Eshleman and certain members of his extended family are parties to surface use agreements that entitle them to surface use payments from the Acquired Companies in certain circumstances. The Alta Mesa Properties are currently being maintained on care and maintenance to enable the Company to restart operations as market conditions warrant. Due to the price of U₃O₈, the Company did not pay any royalty payments or surface use payments to the Sellers or to Mr. Eshleman or his immediate family members in the six months ended June 30, 2017 and does not anticipate paying any royalty payments or surface use payments to the Sellers or to Mr. Eshleman or his immediate family members during the remainder of 2017. Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, surface use payments from June 2016 through December 31, 2018 have been deferred until June 30, 2019 at which time the Company will pay $1.35 million to settle this obligation. As of June 30, 2017, the Company has accrued $0.54 million of this liability on the balance sheet.


14.	SEGMENT INFORMATION

The Company is engaged in uranium extraction, recovery and sales of uranium from mineral properties and the recycling of uranium bearing materials generated by third parties. As a part of these activities the Company also acquires, explores, evaluates and, if warranted, permits uranium properties. The Company’s primary mining activities are in the United States.

The reportable segments are those operations whose operating results are reviewed by the Chief Executive Officer to make decisions about resources to be allocated to the segment and assess its performance provided those operations pass certain quantitative thresholds. Operations whose revenues, earnings or losses or assets exceed 10% of the total consolidated revenue, earnings or losses or assets are reportable segments. Information about assets and liabilities of the segment has not been provided because the information is not used to assess performance.

In order to determine reportable operating segments, management reviewed various factors, including geographical location and managerial structure. It was determined by management that a reportable operating segment generally consists of an individual

property managed by a single general manager and management team. Finance income (expense), other income (expenses) are managed on a consolidated basis and are not allocated to operating segments.

~~Non-mining activities and other operations are reported in Corporate and other.~~

The Company has two operating segments, the conventional uranium recovery segment (the “Conventional Uranium Segment”) and the in-situ uranium recovery segment (the “ISR Uranium Segment”).

Non-mining activities and other operations are reported in Corporate and other.

The Conventional Uranium Segment

The Conventional Uranium Segment consists of a standalone conventional uranium recovery facility (the “White Mesa Mill”), conventional mining projects in the vicinity of the White Mesa Mill located in the Colorado Plateau, Henry Mountains, Arizona Strip, and the Roca Honda Project (“Roca Honda”) in New Mexico, and the Sheep Mountain Project (“Sheep Mountain”) in Wyoming. At ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017 the conventional mining projects in the vicinity of the White Mesa Mill are on standby, being upgraded and evaluated for continued mining activities and/or in process of being permitted. The White Mesa Mill also processes third party uranium-bearing mineralized materials from mining and recycling activities.

The ISR Uranium Segment

The ISR Uranium Segment consists of an operating uranium recovery facility to recover concentrated uranium from wellfields of the Nichols Ranch Project located in Wyoming and a uranium recovery facility and wellfields maintained on standby as part of the Alta Mesa Project in Texas. The Nichols Ranch Project also includes the Jane Dough property and the Hank Project. Additionally, the segment includes other mineral properties in the vicinity of the Nichols Ranch Project and the Alta Mesa Project. The Nichols Ranch Project and surrounding assets were acquired as part of the Company’s 2015 acquisition of Uranerz Energy Corporation and the Alta Mesa Project was acquired in June of 2016.

The following tables set forth operating results by reportable segment for the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016:~~2017:


						Non-Operating						Operating Segments					Non-Operating Segments
	Operating Segments					Segments
Three months ended September 30, 2016	Conventional		ISR			Corporate & Other			Total
Revenue	$	8,702	$	—		$	—		8,702
Costs and expenses applicable to revenue	4,341		—			—			4,341
Three months ended June 30, 2017												Conventional		ISR			Corporate & Other				Total
Revenues
Uranium concentrates												4,406		10,637			—				15,043
Alternate feed materials processing and other												2,840		—			—				2,840
Total revenues												7,246		10,637			—				17,883
Costs and expenses applicable to revenues
Costs and expenses applicable to uranium concentrates												1,503		7,771			—				9,274
Costs and expenses applicable to alternate feed materials and other												1,797		—			—				1,797
Total costs and expenses applicable to revenues												3,300		7,771			—				11,071
Other operating costs
Impairment of inventories	—		1,379			—			1,379			179		1,778			—				1,957
Development, permitting and land holding	2,527		3,725			—			6,252			1,045		141			—				1,186
Standby costs	260		387			—			647			216		813			—				1,029
Abandonment of mineral properties	—		1,005			—			1,005			—		42			—				42
Impairment of assets held for sale												—		3,599			—				3,599
Accretion of asset retirement obligation	130		45			—			175			171		175			—				346
Selling costs	47		—			—			47			45		—			—				45
Intangible asset amortization	583		—			—			583			981		1,906			—				2,887
General and administration	—		437			3,378			3,815			393		199			2,786				3,378
Total operating income (loss)	814		(6,978		)	(3,378		)	(9,542		)
Total operating loss												916		(5,787		)	(2,786		)	—	(7,657		)

Interest Expense	—		—			(573		)	(573		)
Other income	—		—			1,870			1,870
Net income (loss)	$	814	$	(6,978	)	$	(2,081	)	$	(8,245	)
Interest expense												—		—			(503		)		(503		)
Other expense												—		—			3,680				3,680
Net loss												$	916	$	(5,787	)	$	391			$	(4,480	)
Attributable to shareholders	$	814	$	(6,809	)	$	(2,081	)	$	(8,076	)	$	916	$	(5,777	)	$	391			$	(4,470	)
Non-controlling interests	—		(169		)	—			(169		)	—		(10		)	—				$	(10	)
Net income (loss) for the period	$	814	$	(6,978	)	$	(2,081	)	$	(8,245	)
Net loss for the period												$	916	$	(5,787	)	$	391			$	(4,480	)

The following tables set forth operating results by reportable segment for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016:~~2017:


							Non-Operating						Operating Segments						Non-Operating Segments
	Operating Segments						Segments
Nine months ended September 30, 2016	Conventional			ISR			Corporate & Other			Total
Revenue	$	26,704		$	7,000		$	—		33,704
Costs and expenses applicable to revenue	16,484			4,099			—			20,583
Six months ended June 30, 2017													Conventional			ISR			Corporate & Other			Total
Revenues
Uranium concentrates													7,903			10,637			—			18,540
Alternate feed materials processing and other													3,099			—			—			3,099
Total revenues													11,002			10,637			—			21,639
Costs and expenses applicable to revenues
Costs and expenses applicable to uranium concentrates													3,341			7,771			—			11,112
Costs and expenses applicable to alternate feed materials and other													2,030			—			—			2,030
Total costs and expenses applicable to revenues													5,371			7,771			—			13,142
Other operating costs
Impairment of inventories	—			2,998			—			2,998			179			1,778			—			1,957
Development, permitting and land holding	7,806			9,332			—			17,138			3,957			552			—			4,509
Standby costs	3,791			387			—			4,178			645			1,590			—			2,235
Abandonment of mineral properties	—			1,036			—			1,036			—			287			—			287
Impairment of assets held for sale													—			3,599			—			3,599
Accretion of asset retirement obligation	389			137			—			526			341			350			—			691
Selling costs	216			—			—			216			115			—			—			115
Intangible asset amortization	802			2,219			—			3,021			1,186			1,906			—			3,092
General and administration	—			1,233			10,695			11,928			1,168			427			6,211			7,806
Total operating loss	(2,784		)	(14,441		)	(10,695		)	(27,920		)	(1,960		)	(7,623		)	(6,211		)	(15,794		)

Interest Expense	—			—			(1,734		)	(1,734		)	—			—			(1,045		)	(1,045		)
Other income	—			—			2,103			2,103			—			—			1,763			1,763
Net loss	$	(2,784	)	$	(14,441	)	$	(10,326	)	$	(27,551	)	$	(1,960	)	$	(7,623	)	$	(5,493	)	$	(15,076	)
Attributable to shareholders	$	(2,784	)	$	(14,182	)	$	(10,326	)	$	(27,292	)	$	(1,960	)	$	(7,525	)	$	(5,493	)	$	(14,978	)
Non-controlling interests	—			(259		)	—			(259		)	—			(98		)	—			(98		)
Net loss for the period	$	(2,784	)	$	(14,441	)	$	(10,326	)	$	(27,551	)	$	(1,960	)	$	(7,623	)	$	(5,493	)	$	(15,076	)


~~13.~~15.	FAIR VALUE ACCOUNTING

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis

The following tables set forth the fair value of the Company's assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis (at least annually) by level within the fair value hierarchy as at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016.~~2017. As required by accounting guidance, assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

As ~~at September~~of June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, the fair values of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, short-term deposits, receivables, accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate their carrying values because of the short-term nature of these instruments.

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
Investments $ 1,071
$ —
$ —
$ 1,071
Warrant liabilities (Note 7) —
(3,663 ) —
(3,663 )
Convertible debentures (Note 6) (16,101 ) —
—
(16,101 )
$ (15,030 ) $ (3,663 ) $ —
$ (18,693 )



	Level 1			Level 2			Level 3		Total
Investments	$	1,909		$	—		$	—	$	1,909
Warrant liabilities	(2,538		)	(615		)	—		(3,153		)
Convertible debentures	(15,962		)	—			—		(15,962		)
	$	(16,591	)	$	(615	)	$	—	$	(17,206	)

The Company's investments are marketable equity securities which are exchange traded, and are valued using quoted market prices in active markets and as such are classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. The fair value of the investments is calculated as the quoted market price of the marketable equity security multiplied by the quantity of shares held by the Company. Investments are located within prepaid expenses and other current assets and notes receivable and other non-current assets as part of the consolidated balance sheet. Convertible debentures are within non-current loans and borrowings as part of the consolidated balance sheet.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for the three and ~~nine~~six month ~~periods~~period ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, and the related notes thereto, which have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Additionally, the following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and the audited consolidated financial statements included in Part II of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016 filed on March ~~15, 2016.~~9, 2017. This discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements and forward-looking information that involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements and information as a result of many factors. See section “Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” ~~Above.~~

All dollar amounts stated herein are in U.S. dollars, except per share amounts and currency exchange rates unless specified otherwise. References to Cdn$ refer to Canadian currency, and $ to United States currency.

~~Overview~~

~~All activities of the Company prior to the June 18, 2015 acquisition of Uranerz Energy Corporation (“Uranerz”) concerned the Conventional Uranium Segment.~~

~~On June 18, 2015, Energy Fuels acquired all of the outstanding shares of Uranerz which had, among other properties, an active~~ ~~in situ~~ ~~(“ISR”) uranium extraction and recovery facility. These operations acquired from Uranerz are included in the consolidated financial statements as of June 18, 2015.~~

On June 16, 2016, Energy Fuels acquired all the outstanding shares of Mesteña Uranium, LLC (“Mesteña”), and on July 8, 2016 changed the name of Mesteña to “EFR Alta Mesa LLC” (“Alta Mesa”). Alta Mesa’s primary asset is the Alta Mesa Project (the “Alta Mesa Project”), a fully-licensed ISR uranium production facility located in South Texas. In order for the Alta Mesa Project to be capable of uranium production, the Company will need to incur capital expenditures to develop wellfields. A decision to commence development will be made once uranium prices improve to a point where economic feasibility of the Alta Mesa Project is established.

~~The operations of Uranerz and assets acquired in the Alta Mesa acquisition represent the Company’s ISR Uranium Segment.~~above.

While the Company has uranium extraction and recovery activities and generates revenue, it is considered to be in the Exploration Stage (as defined by SEC Industry Guide 7) as it has no Proven or Probable Reserves within the meaning of SEC Industry Guide 7. Under US GAAP, for a property that has no Proven or Probable Reserves, the Company capitalizes the cost of acquiring the property (including mineral properties and rights) and expenses all costs related to the property incurred subsequent to the acquisition of such property. Acquisition costs of a property are depreciated over its estimated useful life for a revenue generating property or expensed if the property is sold or abandoned. Acquisition costs are subject to impairment if so indicated.

~~Outlook~~Overview

We provide the raw materials for generation of clean nuclear electricity. Our primary product is a uranium concentrate (“U₃O₈”), or yellowcake, which when further processed will become the fuel for nuclear energy. According to the Nuclear Energy Institute, nuclear energy provides nearly 20% of the total electricity, and 60% of the clean carbon-free energy, generated in the United States. The Company generates revenues from extracting and processing materials for our own account, as well as from toll processing for others.

Our uranium concentrate is produced from multiple sources:

Conventional recovery operations at our White Mesa Mill (the "Mill") including:

Processing ore from uranium mines;

Recycling of uranium bearing materials that are not derived from conventional ore, known as alternate feed materials; and

In-situ recovery (“ISR”) operations.

In addition, the Company has a long history of conventional vanadium recovery at the Mill, when vanadium prices support those activities, and is evaluating opportunities for copper recovery from our Canyon project.

The Mill, which is located near Blanding Utah, processes ore mined from the Four Corners region of the United States as well as alternate feed materials that can originate worldwide. We have the only operating uranium/vanadium mill in the United States. The Mill is licensed to process an average of 2,000 tons of ore per day and to extract approximately 8.00 million pounds of U₃O₈ per year. The Mill has separate circuits to process conventional uranium and vanadium ores as well as alternate feed materials.

Currently, there are no mines operating in the vicinity of the Mill, due to uneconomic prices. The Mill is currently processing alternate feed materials under a toll processing arrangement as well as alternate feed materials for our own account. Additionally, the Mill is recovering dissolved uranium from the Mill’s tailings management system that was not recovered in previous processing. The Company is actively pursuing additional toll and alternate feed materials for processing at the Mill.

The Mill also continues to pursue additional sources of feed materials. For example, a significant opportunity has arisen for potential clean-up of abandoned uranium mines on the Navajo Nation that is located in northeastern Arizona as well as parts of Utah and New Mexico and other abandoned uranium mines in the vicinity that are not on the Navajo Nation. Recently, the Justice Department and EPA announced settlements in excess of $1.5 billion to fund these clean-up activities. Additional settlements with other parties are also pending. Our Mill is within close trucking distance and is uniquely positioned in this region to receive uranium bearing materials from these cleanups and thus recycle the contained U₃O₈, while at the same time removing such material from the land. There are no other facilities capable of providing this service. Consequently, the Company is actively pursuing these types of opportunities.

The Company’s ISR operations consist of our currently producing Nichols Ranch Project and our standby operation at Alta Mesa. At our Nichols Ranch Project, the Company placed its ninth header house into production in March 2017. In order to save cash

and resources, the Company is deferring additional wellfield development until uranium prices recover. The Alta Mesa Project will remain on standby in the current uranium price environment.

We believe the current spot price of uranium does not support production for the majority of uranium producers and, accordingly, we believe that prices will recover. In anticipation of price recoveries we continue to maintain and advance our resource portfolio. Once prices recover we stand ready to resume wellfield construction at our Nichols Ranch Project, develop wellfields and resume production at our Alta Mesa facility and mine, as well as mine and process ore from our Canyon Project. The Company believes we could start bringing this new production to the market within approximately six months of a positive production decision. Longer term we expect to resume production at our conventional mines on standby and develop our large conventional mines at Roca Honda and Henry Mountains.

In addition to resources controlled by Energy Fuels, there are substantial conventional uranium/vanadium mines/projects in the vicinity of our Mill, which as stated above, is the only operating mill in the United States. We expect that as these mines are brought into production we will be able to generate profitable toll milling contracts to process this third party ore.

Uranium Market Update

According to monthly price data from TradeTech LLC ~~(“TradeTech”~~(“TradeTech”), uranium spot prices ~~are down from $34.20~~were $20.25 per pound on December 31, ~~2015 to $22.25~~2016 and $20.35 per pound on ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016, or 35% for the year-to-date.~~2017. Weekly spot prices reported by TradeTech reached a ~~low~~high of ~~$18.75~~$26.50 per pound on ~~October~~February 10, 2017, and were at $20.25 on July 31, ~~2016, which was the lowest value observed by TradeTech since August 2004.~~2017. TradeTech price data also indicate that long-termU₃O₈prices, which began~~2016~~2017 at ~~$44.00~~$30.00 per pound, ~~dropped~~increased to ~~$35.00~~$34.00 per pound by ~~October~~June 30, 2017 then fell to $32.00 on July 31, ~~2016.~~2017. According to TradeTech’s July 7, 2017 Nuclear Market Review, year-to-date spot sales and volume appear to be about average for the same period in recent years. In addition, according to TradeTech’s June 30, 2017 Nuclear Market Review, traders have been active in the spot market, along with financial entities, producers, and utilities acting as buyers and traders, financial entities and producers acting as sellers. TradeTech also notes that “[m]id- and long-term buying interest remains steady, with several other utilities contemplating entry into the mid- or long-term markets during the third quarter of this year.” NMR, June 30, 2017.

The ~~drop~~rise in uranium spot prices seen in the first quarter of 2017 is believed to have been primarily caused by the announcement that Kazakhstan, the World’s leading producer of uranium, expects to cut production by 10% in 2017, and the potential for further reductions in production from other uranium supply during 2017. In addition on March 28, 2017, a high court in Japan lifted an injunction preventing the restart of the Takahama 3 and 4 reactors clearing the way for these units to restart in May and June. And, on April 26, 2017, the U.S. Department of Energy announced that it was reducing uranium transfers from stockpiles by 1.1 million pounds for each of 2017 and 2018.

However, during the second quarter of 2017, other news is believed to have caused a reduction in uranium prices that reached a quarterly low of $19.50 on May 26, 2017. On March 29, 2017, Toshiba’s Westinghouse nuclear division filed for Chapter 11 protection, creating some uncertainty about the four nuclear reactors currently under construction in the U.S. In addition, on May 10, 2017 South Korea elected Moon-Hae-in as President. He is ~~believed~~pursuing a policy to ~~be caused by continued weak demand by utilities~~slow South Korea’s nuclear program, and ~~persistent over-supply. Most transactions~~ on ~~the~~June 27, 2017 it was announced that South Korea would suspend construction of two reactors (Reuters, June 27, 2017). On May 30, 2017, Exelon announced that it planned to prematurely close its Three Mile Island plant. While spot ~~market in 2016~~prices have ~~involved traders and intermediaries, though certain utilities have entered~~recovered somewhat from their late-2016 lows, the market ~~to opportunistically buy inexpensive material.~~remains weak and oversupplied, and additional production cuts have not yet materialized. The Company continues to believe that the continued weak uranium markets are primarily the result of excess uranium supplies caused by large quantities of secondary uranium extraction, excess inventories, and thus far insufficient production cut-backs. The oversupply situation is further exacerbated by reduced demand due to the continued delays in the restart of Japanese reactors, premature reactor closures in the US, and general weakness in the global economy and energy sector. However, since the beginning of the year, certain announcements have been made which may lessen some of the oversupply now burdening the market, including Cameco Corporation’s April 21, 2016 announcement that it is reducing production by approximately 4 million pounds per year in 2016, Paladin’s announcement that it is implementing a reduced mining plan at its Langer Heinrich mine in Namibia, and Kazakhstan’s statement at the World Nuclear Association Conference in London on September 15, 2016 that it does not expect to expand uranium production under current market conditions.

As a result of the expected global growth of nuclear energy, the Company continues to believe the long-term fundamentals of the uranium industry remain positive. The Company believes prices must rise to higher levels to support new primary production that will be required to meet the increasing demand we expect to see as more nuclear units are constructed around the world. According to TradeTech, world uranium requirements continue to exceed primary mine production, with the gap being bridged by secondary supplies and excess uranium inventories in various forms that have already been mined. As excess inventories are drawn down and as production from existing mines declines, the Company believes primary mine production will be required to meet demand over the long-term.

Despite current market uncertainty and recently falling prices, the Company continues to believe it has begun to see certain events which must occur for a market recovery to materialize, as previously described in the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015. Of note, China finalized its 13^th Five-Year Plan, including a commitment to install 58 GW of nuclear capacity by 2020 (versus today’s 27 GW in installed capacity). In addition, China connected eight reactors to the grid in 2015 (World Nuclear News, January 4, 2016). According to the World Nuclear Association, five new units have commenced operations in China in 2016 and two more are expected to commence operations by year end. Japanese utilities are making slow progress in restarting their nuclear fleet. Three reactors have restarted (Sendai 1 and 2 and Ikata 3, though Sendai 1 was shut-down in early-October for inspections and maintenance), and two more units are approved to restart pending resolution of an injunction (Takahama 3 and 4). It is worth noting that 42 reactors in Japan are operable according to the World Nuclear Association, and, in addition to the five mentioned above, 24 have applied for approvals to restart. And, the Company expects to see additional utilities come to the market later in the final quarter of 2016 to take advantage of current low prices through spot and mid-term purchases. However, these positive developments have not yet been sufficient to offset the downward pressure currently being observed in uranium markets.

~~Acquisition of Alta Mesa~~

On June 16, 2016, the Company completed the acquisition of Alta Mesa (previously named “Mesteña Uranium, LLC”) which included the Alta Mesa Project. The Alta Mesa Project has a fully-licensed and constructed ISR uranium recovery plant, with a design capacity of 1.5 million pounds of uranium concentrate per year. In order for Alta Mesa to be capable of uranium production, the Company will need to incur capital expenditures to develop wellfields. A decision to commence development will be made once uranium prices improve to a point where economic feasibility of the Alta Mesa Project is established. The consideration paid by the Company for Alta Mesa was 4,551,284 common shares, which were issued at the closing of the transaction.

Operations Update and ~~Sales~~ Outlook

With the June 2016 acquisition of Alta Mesa, which includes the Alta Mesa ISR Project, and the June 2015 acquisition of Uranerz, which includes the Nichols Ranch ISR Project, Energy Fuels has increased its flexibility to adjust its uranium production levels to respond to market conditions and to meet the requirements of its existing sales contracts. This allows the Company to fulfill its existing commitments and commit to new spot and term sales that will be sourced from uranium recovered from the Company’s facilities.

The Company plans to extract and/or recover uranium from the following sources ~~in the remainder of 2016 and~~ in 2017 (each of which is more fully described below):



	1)	Nichols Ranch ISR Project;
	2)	Alternate feed ~~materials;~~
	3)	~~Remaining Pinenut Project material available for milling;~~materials and
	4)	~~Pond Returns~~ pond returns at the ~~White Mesa~~ Mill.

Our planned operations are expected to produce finished uranium in excess of our existing requirements under our sales contracts.

In response to continued uranium price weakness and market uncertainty and, until such time that improvement in uranium market conditions is observed or suitable sales contracts can be entered into, the Company expects to defer further development of its Nichols Ranch project beyond its ninth header house and keep the Alta Mesa Project on care and maintenance. The Company is also seeking new sources of revenue, including new sources of alternate feed materials and new fee processing opportunities at the White Mesa Mill that can be processed under existing market conditions.

~~The Company will complete its evaluation of the Canyon Project as discussed below.~~

In addition, the Company is continuing to manage its activities and assets conservatively, maintaining its substantial uranium resource base and its ISR and conventional uranium extraction and recovery capabilities.

~~The Company will continue to evaluate additional acquisition opportunities that may arise.~~

Extraction and Recovery Activities - Overview

The ~~Company has recovered approximately 630,000 pounds of U~~₃O₈ ~~during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and expects to recover approximately 405,000 pounds of U~~₃O₈ ~~for the final three months of the year, as further described below. Additionally, the~~ Company expects to produce ~~800,000~~a total of 640,000 to 675,000 pounds in the year ending December 31, ~~2017.~~2017 of which 204,000 pounds U₃O₈were produced in the first half of the year. The Company is maintaining its previous guidance of 675,000 within a range, to allow for uncertainty in the estimates.

The Company currently has finished goods inventory and uranium extraction and recovery capabilities that exceed the commitments contained in ~~its~~our existing sales contracts. As a result, both ISR and conventional uranium extraction and/or recovery have been, and are expected to continue to be, maintained at conservative levels until such time as market conditions improve sufficiently.

Extraction and Recovery - ISR Uranium ~~Segment~~Operations

~~We have extracted and~~During the first half of 2017, we recovered ~~approximately 265,000~~138,000 pounds of U₃O₈uranium from ~~our~~ Nichols ~~Ranch Project for the nine months ended September 30, 2016~~Ranch. Production is expected to be somewhat lower than previously forecast due to normal production declines and ~~expect to extract and recover approximately 70,000 pounds of U~~₃O₈~~from our ISR segment for the final three months of the year. Additionally,~~cost-saving measures the Company ~~expects to produce 350,000 pounds~~is implementing in ~~the year ending December 31, 2017 from Nichols Ranch.~~

In February 2016, the Company completed construction of the elution circuit and began the elution process at the Nichols Ranch Plant. Yellowcake slurry from this circuit is being shipped to our White Mesa Mill for final yellowcake drying, packaging, and shipment to a conversion facility.

~~At September 30, 2016, the~~today’s weak uranium price environment. The Nichols Ranch wellfields ~~had eight~~have nine header houses extracting uranium. The ~~Company plans to complete a~~ ninth header house ~~by the end of 2016. However, until~~began extracting uranium in March 2017. Until such time that improvement in uranium market conditions is observed or suitable sales contracts can be entered into, the Company intends to defer development of ~~the tenth~~further header ~~house~~houses at its Nichols Ranch ~~project and to keep the Alta Mesa Project on care and maintenance.~~

Permitting of the Jane Dough Property, which is adjacent to Nichols Ranch, is continuing and is expected to be completed in advance of our need to begin wellfield construction. Also, the Hank Project is fully permitted to be constructed as a satellite facility to the Nichols Ranch Plant.project.

Extraction and Recovery - ~~Conventional Uranium Segment~~Milling Operations

~~The White Mesa Mill has~~In the first half of 2017, we recovered ~~approximately 365,000~~66,000 pounds of U₃O₈during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 primarily from alternate feed materials and milling of previously mined ore from the Pinenut Mine. The Company expects to complete milling the previously mined ore from the Pinenut Mine and certain alternate feed sources during the final three months of the year, producing an additional 335,000 pounds of U₃O₈ ~~by year-end.~~

~~The Company expects to recover approximately 450,000 pounds of U~~₃O₈~~during the year ending December 31, 2017~~uranium at the ~~White Mesa~~ Mill ~~including approximately 300,000 pounds of U~~₃O₈ ~~from dissolved uranium not recovered from previous processing in the mill tailings management system (“Pond Return”) and approximately 150,000 pounds of U~~₃O₈~~from alternate feed sources.~~for its own account. In addition, during 2017, the Company expects to earn a fee for processing ~~additional quantities~~approximately 1.0 million pounds of U₃O₈ contained in alternate feed ~~material~~materials at the ~~White Mesa~~ Mill, returning all finished uranium product to the generator of the feed material. ~~The processing fee earned by~~During the six months ended June 30, 2017 the Company iscompleted the processing of 466,000 pounds of this material. We expect production from the White Mesa Mill to be somewhat higher than previously forecast, mainly due to higher-than-expected recoveries from pond returns, and to partially or wholly offset the lower than expected ~~to cover the Company's processing cost and provide the Company with a reasonable margin.~~production from Nichols Ranch.

The ~~White Mesa~~ Mill has historically operated on a campaign basis, whereby uranium recovery is scheduled as mill feed, cash needs, contract requirements, and/or market conditions may warrant. ~~Once~~The Company is actively pursuing opportunities to process new and additional alternate feed sources, low grade ore from third parties in connection with various uranium clean-up requirements and further recovery of Pond Return. Successful results from these activities would allow the ~~recovery activities discussed above~~Mill to extend the current campaign into 2018 and beyond.

In the event we are ~~concluded (expected~~unable to ~~be in~~secure sufficient ore or other feed sources for the ~~second half of 2017),~~Mill into the future, the Company ~~expects~~would expect to place uranium recovery activities at the Mill on standby until ~~additional~~sufficient mill feed becomes available. ~~The~~While on standby, the Mill ~~will~~would continue to dry and package material from the Nichols Ranch Plant and continue to receive and stockpile alternate feed materials for future milling campaigns. Each future milling campaign ~~will~~would be subject to receipt of sufficient mill feed that would allow the Company to operate the Mill on a profitable basis and/or recover a portion of its standby costs.

~~Evaluation, permitting~~Shaft sinking and ~~standby~~evaluation of the Canyon Project

The Company substantially completed shaft sinking and underground evaluation drilling activities ~~- Conventional Uranium Segment~~in March 2017 at the Canyon Project which has resulted in a reduction in the workforce at this project at this time.

The Company is ~~continuing shaft sinking activities at~~actively processing and reviewing the ~~Canyon Project, along with underground~~ drilling results in order to further define the mineralization, develop mine plans and evaluate the ~~deposit.~~Mill’s ability to recover a salable copper product from the significant copper mineralization the Company has identified. Through evaluation activities completed to date, the Company has identified zones of high-grade uranium and copper mineralization within the deposit. The best uranium intercepts include ~~8.5-feet~~6.0-feet of mineralization with an average grade of ~~6.88%~~16.99% eU₃O₈, ~~48.0-feet~~46.0-feet of mineralization with an average grade of ~~1.02%~~1.37% eU₃O₈, and ~~35-feet~~41-feet of mineralization with an average grade of ~~1.39%~~1.00% eU₃O₈. ~~Five~~Nineteen core holes with a total intercept length of ~~313-feet~~645-feet have averaged ~~8.75%~~6.63% Cu, with ~~one intercept hitting 5-feet of 31.69%~~several intercepts over 20% Cu. ~~In addition, analytical results demonstrate the existence of silver, zinc, and other minerals in the deposit.~~ The Company is evaluating the potential for recovering copper ~~and other minerals~~ at its White Mesa Mill as a value-added ~~byproducts~~byproduct along with the recovery of uranium. The Company plans to issue an updated NI 43-101 compliant technical report in the second half of 2017, which will address its resource estimation.

The timing of the Company’s plans to extract and process mineralized materials from ~~this project~~the Canyon Project will be based on the results of this additional evaluation work, along with market conditions and available financing.

Other operational activities

~~The Company is selectively advancing certain permits at other~~Permitting of the ~~Company’s major conventional uranium projects. The~~Jane Dough Property, which is adjacent to Nichols Ranch, was completed in March 2017.

In January 2017, the Company ~~plans~~obtained the necessary permits to ~~continue~~mine the ~~licensing~~open pit and ~~permitting~~underground resources of ~~the Roca Honda Project, a large, high-grade conventional project in New Mexico, maintain required permits at the Company’s conventional standby projects including the La Sal Project, and the~~

~~Daneros Project and complete certain other well-advanced permits on the~~its Sheep Mountain Project in Wyoming, the Daneros Project expansion, and the La Sal Project expansion. All of these projects serve as important pipeline assets for the Company’s future conventional production capabilities, as market conditions warrant. The Company will also continue to evaluate the Bullfrog Property at its Henry Mountains Project. Expenditures for certain of these projects have been adjusted to coincide with expected dates of price recoveries based on our forecasts.

~~Other~~Wyoming.

The Company is continuing to pursue ~~significant~~ cost cutting initiatives, including ~~a reduction in scope of certain development initiatives,~~ the potential sale or abandonment of certain non-core properties and the sale of excess mining equipment and other assets. In addition, at its meeting on November 3, 2016, the Board of Directors decided to reduce their total compensation by 20% and receive one-third of their compensation in cash and two-thirds in restricted share units, thereby resulting in a 33% total reduction in cash compensation.

Sales and other revenue update and outlook

~~During~~In the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, the Company ~~has~~ completed ~~sales under its existing contracts~~deliveries of ~~550,000 pounds of U~~₃O_8.~~The Company also sold 50,000~~360,000 pounds of U₃O₈tounder four contracts, including 260,000 pounds under three long-term contracts and 100,000 pounds under a ~~utility~~contract where the price was based on spot ~~prices at~~prices.

In the ~~time~~second half of the ~~contract.~~

~~The~~year, the Company ~~is expecting~~expects to complete ~~additional sales~~deliveries of ~~550,000~~160,000 pounds of U₃O₈~~during~~under two contracts, including 60,000 pounds under a long-term contract and 100,000 pounds under a contract where the ~~three months ending December 31, 2016. We had previously forecasted total sales for the year ending December 31, 2016 of 800,000 pounds of U~~₃O₈. The additional 350,000 pounds of sales are expected to result from moving 300,000 pounds of deliveries under one of our contracts from the year ending December 31, 2017 to the three months ending December 31, 2016 (representing the final delivery under this contract). In consideration for moving these contract deliveries, the Company provided the customer with a small discount, which will be satisfied by the Company delivering additional uranium to this customer priced at the published October 2016 month-end spot uranium price. The Company also contracted to sell 200,000 pounds of U₃O₈~~on December 1, 2016 and 200,000 pounds in each of the years ending December 31, 2017 and 2018, with each delivery being priced~~price is based on the average spot price per pound of uranium for the five weeks prior to the ~~date~~dates of delivery. ~~The Company expects to complete~~Of these ~~sales from U~~deliveries, 60,000 pounds represent the final deliveries under the long-term contract.₃O₈~~already in inventory or expected to be recovered from its planned activities discussed above.~~

The Company is currently monitoring market conditions for additional sales opportunities. Selective additional spot sales may be made as necessary to generate cash for operations and development activities.

InDuring the year ending December 31, 2017, the Company expects to ~~complete deliveries~~earn approximately $6.5 million in toll revenue for processing certain alternate feed materials for a third party of ~~520,000 pounds~~which $3.10 million was earned in the first half of U₃O₈under four contracts, including 320,000 pounds under three long-term contracts and 200,000 pounds under the spot contract discussed above. Of these deliveries, 120,000 pounds represent the final deliveries under one of these contracts. The 2017 deliveries under our contracts are 100,000 pounds lower than previous guidance, as we accelerated the delivery of 300,000 pounds from 2017 to the three months ending December 31, 2016 and added 200,000 pounds of sales under the spot contract, all as discussed above. Selective additional spot sales may be made as necessary to generate cash for operations and development activities.

2017. The Company also continues to pursue new sources of revenue, including ~~expansion of its~~additional alternate feed ~~business.~~materials, toll processing of alternate feed materials and other sources of feed for the Mill.

Results of Operations

The following table summarizes the results of operations for the three and ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016 (in thousands of US dollars):

Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30,
2016 2015 2016 2015
Revenue $ 8,702
$ 19,159
$ 33,704
$ 50,464
Costs and expenses applicable to revenue 4,341
11,786
20,583
29,012
Impairment of inventories 1,379
—
2,998
—
Gross Profit 2,982
7,373
10,123
21,452

Other operating costs and expenses
Development, permitting and land holding 6,252
3,934
17,138
4,636
Standby costs 647
1,015
4,178
4,335
Abandonment of mineral properties 1,005
—
1,036
—
Impairment of assets held for sale —
2,000
—
2,000
Accretion of asset retirement obligation 175
143
526
350
Total other operating costs and expenses 8,079
7,092
22,878
11,321

Selling, general & administration
Selling costs 47
40
216
199
Intangible asset amortization 583
1,772
3,021
3,572
General and administration 3,815
3,887
11,928
9,223
Costs directly attributable to acquisitions —
190
—
6,777
Total selling, general & administration 4,445
5,889
15,165
19,771

Total Operating Loss (9,542 ) (5,608 ) (27,920 ) (9,640 )
Interest expense (573 ) (625 ) (1,734 ) (1,391 )
Other (expense) income 1,870
838
2,103
373
Net loss $ (8,245 ) $ (5,395 ) $ (27,551 ) $ (10,658 )

Basic and diluted loss per share $ (0.14 ) $ (0.12 ) $ (0.51 ) $ (0.36 )

For the three months ended September 30, 2016 the Company recorded a net loss of $8.25 million or $0.14 per share compared with a loss of $5.40 million or $0.12 per share for the three months ended September 30, 2015. For the nine months ended September 30, 2016 the Company recorded a net loss of $27.55 million or $0.51 per share compared with a loss of $10.66 million or $0.36 per share for the nine months ended September 30, 2015.



	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2017			2016			2017			2016
Revenues
Uranium concentrates	$	15,043		$	6,999		$	18,540		$	24,977
Alternate feed materials processing and other	2,840			7			3,099			$	25
Total revenues	17,883			7,006			21,639			$	25,002
Costs and expenses applicable to revenue
Costs and expenses applicable to uranium concentrates	9,274			4,099			11,112			$	16,242
Costs and expenses applicable to alternate feed materials and other	1,797			—			2,030			$	—
Total costs and expenses applicable to revenue	11,071			4,099			13,142			$	16,242
Impairment of inventories	1,957			1,619			1,957			1,619
Gross Profit	4,855			1,288			6,540			7,141

Other operating costs and expenses
Development, permitting and land holding	1,186			3,475			4,509			10,917
Standby costs	1,029			1,365			2,235			3,531
Abandonment of mineral properties	42			—			287			—
Impairment of assets held for sale	3,599			—			3,599			—
Accretion of asset retirement obligation	346			176			691			351
Total other operating costs and expenses	6,202			5,016			11,321			14,799

Selling, general & administration
Selling costs	45			95			115			169
Intangible asset amortization	2,887			2,219			3,092			2,438
General and administration	3,378			4,285			7,806			8,113
Total selling, general & administration	6,310			6,599			11,013			10,720

Total Operating Loss	(7,657		)	(10,327		)	(15,794		)	(18,378		)
Interest expense	(503		)	(585		)	(1,045		)	(1,161		)
Other income	3,680			471			1,763			233
Net loss	$	(4,480	)	$	(10,441	)	$	(15,076	)	$	(19,306	)

Basic and diluted loss per share	$	(0.06	)	$	(0.20	)	$	(0.22	)	$	(0.38	)

Revenues

The Company’s revenues from uranium are largely based on delivery schedules under long-term contracts, and selective spot sales, which can vary from quarter to quarter.

Revenues for the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017 totaled ~~$8.70~~$17.88 million, of which ~~$8.69~~$15.04 million were from sales ~~related to the conventional segment,~~ of ~~150,000~~200,000 pounds of U3O8, pursuant to term contracts at an average price of ~~$58.00~~$65.38 per ~~pound.~~pound, 100,000 pounds of U3O8 pursuant to a contract where the price is based on the spot market at a price of $19.67 per pound and $2.84 million related to toll processing of uranium concentrates.

Revenues for the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2015~~2016 totaled ~~$19.16~~$7.01 million, of which ~~$19.16~~$7.00 million were sales of ~~341,667~~100,000 pounds of U₃O₈, pursuant to a term contract at an average price of $70.00 per pound.

Revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2017 totaled $21.64 million, of which $18.54 million consisted of sales of 260,000 pounds of U3O8.8, pursuant to term contracts at an average price of $63.74 per pound, 100,000 pounds of U3O8 pursuant to a contract where the price is based on the spot market at a price of $19.67 per pound and $3.10 million related to toll processing of uranium concentrates.

Revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2016 totaled $25.00 million, of which $24.98 million consisted of sales of 450,000 pounds of U3O8. The ~~341,667~~450,000 pounds of U3O8 included the sale of ~~266,667~~300,000 pounds of U3O8 pursuant to term contracts at an average price of ~~$57.34 per pound and the sale of 75,000 pounds of U~~3O8 pursuant to term contracts at an average price of $52.00 per pound. For the three months ended September 30, 2015 sales related to the Conventional Uranium Segment were $15.26 million while sales related to the ISR segment were $3.90 million.

~~Revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 totaled $33.70 million, of which $33.66 million were sales of 600,000 pounds of U~~3O8~~. The 600,000 pounds of U~~3O8 ~~included the sale of 450,000 pounds of U~~3O8 ~~pursuant to term contracts at an average price of $55.43~~$54.19 per pound, the sale of 100,000 pounds of U3O8 pursuant to term contracts at an average price of $70.00 per pound and the sale of 50,000 pounds of U3O8 on the spot market at a price of $34.40 per pound. ~~For the nine months ended September 30, 2016 sales related to the Conventional Uranium Segment were $26.70 million while sales related to the ISR segment were $7.00 million.~~

~~Revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 totaled $50.46 million, of which $49.80 million were sales of 875,000 pounds of U~~3O8~~. The 875,000 pounds of U~~3O8 ~~included the sale of 875,000 pounds of U~~3O8 pursuant to term contracts at an average price of $56.94 per pound. For the nine months ended September 30, 2015 sales related to the Conventional Uranium Segment were $46.56 million while sales related to the ISR segment were $3.90 million.

Operating Expenses

Uranium recovered and costs and expenses applicable to revenue

In the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, the Company recovered ~~90,000~~80,000 pounds of U3O8 from ~~its ISR Uranium Segment~~the Nichols Ranch Project and ~~260,000~~32,000 pounds of U3O8 from the Company’s ~~conventional operations including 195,000 pounds from conventional ore and 65,000 pounds from~~ alternate feed ~~materials.~~sources. In addition, the Company recovered 359,000 pounds for the account of a third party under a tolling agreement. In the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2015,~~2016, the Company recovered ~~75,000~~80,000 pounds of U₃O₈ from ~~its ISR Uranium Segment~~the Nichols Ranch Project and ~~100,000~~108,000 pounds of U₃O₈ from the ~~Company’s conventional operations all from alternate feed materials.~~White Mesa Mill.

Costs and expenses applicable to revenue from sales for the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017 totaled ~~$4.34~~$9.27 million, compared with ~~$11.79~~$4.10 million for the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2015.~~2016. The increase in the cost of sales was primarily attributable to the increase in the quantity of U₃O₈ sold year over year as discussed above. Costs of goods sold related to sales revenue averaged $30.91 per pound and $40.99 per pound for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. For the three months ended June 30, 2017, cost of sales related to tolling and other revenue totaled $1.80 million compared to $Nil for the three months ended June 30, 2016.

In the six months ended June 30, 2017, the Company recovered 138,000 pounds of U₃O₈ from the Nichols Ranch Project, 66,000 pounds of U₃O₈ from the Company’s alternate feed sources. In addition, the Company recovered 466,000 pounds for the account of a third party under a tolling agreement. In the six months ended June 30, 2016, the Company recovered 165,000 pounds of U₃O₈from the Nichols Ranch Project and 108,000 pounds of U₃O₈ from the White Mesa Mill.

Costs and expenses applicable to revenue from sales for the six months ended June 30, 2017 totaled $11.11 million, compared with $16.24 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016. The decrease in the cost of sales was primarily attributable to the decrease in the quantity of U₃O₈ sold year over year as discussed above. Costs of goods sold averaged ~~$28.93~~$30.87 per pound and ~~$34.51~~$36.09 per pound for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, 2017 and 2016, ~~and 2015,~~ respectively. ~~Additionally,~~For the ~~Company recorded an impairment loss~~six months ended June 30, 2017, cost of ~~$1.38 million in profit and loss~~sales related to ~~concentrates~~tolling and ~~work in progress inventories in~~other revenue totaled $2.03 million compared to $Nil for the ~~ISR segment during the three~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, 2016.

InImpairment of Inventories

For the ~~nine~~three and six months ended ~~September~~June 30, 2017, the Company recognized $1.96 million in impairment charges related to inventory. For the same period ended June 30, 2016, the Company ~~recovered 265,000 pounds of U~~3O8 ~~from its ISR Uranium Segment and 365,000 pounds of U~~3O8 from the Company’s conventional operations including 195,000 pounds from conventional ore and 170,000 pounds from alternate feed materials. In the nine months ended September 30, 2015, the Company recovered 85,000 pounds of U3O8 ~~from its ISR Uranium Segment and approximately 300,000 pounds of U~~3O8~~, of which 210,000 pounds were from alternate feed materials and other processing and 30,000 pounds were from conventional ore, and 60,000 pounds of U~~3O8 ~~were processed under a tolling arrangement for the account of a third party.~~

Costs and expenses applicable to revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 totaled $20.58 million, compared with $29.01 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015. The decrease in the cost of sales was primarily attributable to the decrease in the quantity of U3O8 sold year over year as discussed above. Costs of goods sold averaged $34.30 per pound and $33.15 per pound for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Additionally, the Company recorded an impairment loss of $3.00recognized $1.62 million in ~~profit~~inventory impairment. The impairment of inventories is due to declining Uranium prices and ~~loss related~~lower amounts of contract sales due to ~~concentrates and work in progress inventories in the ISR segment during the nine months ended September 30, 2016.~~expiring sales contracts.

Other operating costs and expenses

Development, permitting and land holding

For the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, 2017, the Company spent $1.19 million for development, permitting, and land holding primarily at the Canyon Project completing the sinking of the shaft, completing evaluation drilling and finalizing development of the site. While we believe the amounts expensed will add value to the Company, we expense these amounts as we do not have proven or probable reserves at the Nichols Ranch Project or the White Mesa asset group under SEC Industry Guide 7. In the second half of the year the Company expects its expenditures for development, permitting and land holding costs will decrease substantially as these activities are completed.

For the three months ended June 30, 2016, the Company spent ~~$6.25~~$3.48 million for development, permitting, and land holding primarily related to wellfield construction at the Nichols Ranch Project and shaft sinking at the Canyon Project. While we expect the amounts expensed will add value to the Company, we expense these amounts as we do not have proven or probable reserves at the Nichols Ranch Project or the White Mesa asset group under SEC Industry Guide 7.

For the ~~three~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2015, we~~2017, the Company spent ~~$3.93~~$4.51 million ~~primarily on~~for development, permitting, and land holding of which $3.81 million was spent at the Canyon Project completing the sinking of the shaft, completing evaluation drilling and finalizing development of the site. Additionally, the Company spent $0.70 million completing and putting into production its ninth wellfield at Nichols Ranch, completing the permitting on the Jane Dough Project and the Sheep Mountain Project and for ~~our conventional assets.~~other permitting activities and land holding costs in the six months ended June 30, 2017.While we expect the amounts expensed will add value to the Company, we expense these amounts as we do not have proven or probable reserves at the Nichols Ranch Project or the White Mesa asset group under SEC Industry Guide 7.

For the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, 2016, the Company spent ~~$17.14~~$10.92 million for development, permitting, and land holding primarily related to wellfield construction and completion of the elution circuit at the Nichols Ranch Project, shaft sinking at the Canyon Project and for the replacement of five leach tanks at the White Mesa Mill in preparation for the ~~milling~~ campaign. While we expect the amounts expensed will add value to the Company, we expense these amounts as we do not have proven or probable reserves at the Nichols Ranch Project or the White Mesa asset group under SEC Industry Guide 7. For the nine months ended September 30, 2015, we spent $4.64 million primarily on permitting and land holding for our conventional assets.

Standby expense

The Company’s La Sal and Daneros Projects were placed on standby in the last quarter of calendar year 2012 as a result of market conditions. In February 2014, the Company placed its Arizona 1 Project on standby. In 2015 and 2016, the White Mesa Mill was operated at lower levels of uranium recovery, including prolonged periods of standby. Costs related to the care and maintenance of the standby mines, along with standby costs incurred while the White Mesa Mill was operating at low levels of uranium recovery or on standby, are expensed.

For the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, standby costs totaled ~~$0.65~~$1.03 million compared with ~~$1.02~~$1.37 million in ~~2015.~~2016. For the six months ended June 30, 2017, standby costs totaled $2.24 million compared with $3.53 million in 2016. The decrease is primarily related to decreased standby costs at the White Mesa Mill as it was operating at a ~~conventional ore campaign during~~level above the ~~quarter.~~

~~For the nine months ended September 30, 2016,~~threshold for standby costs ~~totaled $4.18 million compared with $4.34 million in 2015. The standby costs remained approximately the same for each period.~~to be incurred.

Accretion

Accretion related to the asset retirement obligation for the Company’s properties increased for the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017 to ~~$0.18~~$0.35 million compared with ~~$0.14~~$0.18 million in ~~2015.~~2016. This is primarily due to the increase in the amount of the asset retirement obligation added in connection with the ~~Uranerz acquisition.~~Mesteña transaction.

Accretion related to the asset retirement obligation for the Company’s properties increased for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016 to $0.53~~2017 $0.69 million compared with the 2016 $0.35 million ~~in 2015. This is~~ primarily due to the increase in the amount of the asset retirement obligation added in connection with the ~~Uranerz acquisition.~~Mesteña transaction.

General and Administrative

General and administrative expense includes costs associated with marketing uranium, corporate and general and administrative costs. General and administrative expenses consist primarily of payroll and related expenses for personnel, contract and professional services, stock-based compensation expense and other overhead expenditures. General and administrative expenses ~~remained approximately the same for each period and~~ totaled ~~$3.82~~$3.38 million for the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017 compared to ~~$3.89~~$4.29 million for the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2015.~~2016. The decrease is primarily due to a lower head count in 2017.

General and administrative expenses totaled ~~$11.93~~$7.81 million for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017 compared to ~~$9.22~~$8.11 million for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2015.~~2016. This ~~increase~~decrease is due to ~~additional general and administrative expenses related to the acquired ISR uranium segment which was completed~~lower headcount in ~~June 2015.~~2017.

Intangible asset amortization

Intangible asset amortization are non-cash costs of amortization of above-market sales contract value associated with the acquisition of Denison’s US Mining Division in June 2012 and the Uranerz acquisition in June 2015. During the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017 intangible asset amortization totaled ~~$0.58~~$2.89 million compared with ~~$1.77~~$2.22 million for the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2015.~~2016. For the six months ended June 30, 2017 intangible asset amortization totaled $3.09 million compared with the $2.44 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016. This ~~decrease~~increase for both the three and six months was due to a ~~decrease in~~timing of contracted sales ~~from 341,667 pounds in 2015 to 150,000 pounds in 2016~~ as discussed ~~above, causing less contract amortization to be recorded.~~

During the nine months ended September 30, 2016 intangible asset amortization totaled $3.02 million compared with $3.57 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015. This decrease was due to a decrease in contracted sales from 875,000 pounds in 2015 to 550,000 pounds in 2016 as discussed above, causing less contract amortization to be recorded.above.

Interest Expense and Other Income and Expenses

Interest Expense

Interest expense for the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017 was ~~$0.57~~$0.50 million compared with ~~$0.63~~$0.59 million in the prior year.

Interest expense for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017 was ~~$1.73~~$1.05 million compared with ~~$1.39~~$1.16 million in the prior year. ~~The increase is primarily due to interest on the $18.81 million in debt assumed from the June 2015 Uranerz acquisition.~~

Other income and expense

For the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, other income and expense totaled ~~$1.87~~$3.68 million of income. These amounts primarily consist of a gain on the increase in warrant liabilities of ~~$1.18 million, gains in miscellaneous items of $0.33~~$3.04 million, a gain on the change in the mark-to-market values of the Company's Convertible Debentures (the “Debentures”) of ~~$0.32~~$0.15 million, gain on sale of surplus assets of $0.35 million, a gain on investments accounted for at fair value of $0.12 million and interest income of ~~$0.04~~$0.03 million.

For the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2015,~~2016, other income and expense totaled ~~$0.84~~$0.47 million of income. These amounts primarily consist of a gain on warrant liabilities of ~~$0.71 million, a gain on the change in the mark-to-market values of the Debentures of $0.02 million, a gain on the change in value of investments at fair value of $0.15~~$0.45 million and ~~interest income of $0.02 million partially offset by a loss in miscellaneous items of $0.06 million~~

~~For the nine months ended September 30, 2016, other income and expense totaled $2.10~~$0.50 million of ~~income. These amounts primarily consist of a gain on warrant liabilities of $1.88 million,~~ gains in miscellaneous items ~~of $0.81 million and interest income of $0.08 million.~~ partially offset by a loss on the change in the mark-to-market values of the Company's Convertible Debentures (the “Debentures”) of ~~$0.67~~$0.43 million.

For the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2015,~~2017, other income and expense totaled ~~$0.37~~$1.76 million of income. These amounts ~~primarily~~mainly consist of a gain on warrant liabilities of ~~$0.71~~$0.85 million, ~~gains~~$0.62 million gain in ~~miscellaneous items of $0.38 million, a gain on the change in~~fair value of investments, ~~at fair value~~gain on sale of ~~$0.11~~surplus assets of $1.14 million ~~and interest income of $0.06 million.~~ partially offset by a loss on the change in the mark-to-market values of the Company's Debentures of ~~$0.89~~$0.78 million.

For the six months ended June 30, 2016, other income and expense totaled $0.23 million of income. These amounts mainly consist of a gain on warrant liabilities of $0.70 million and gains in other miscellaneous items of $0.48 million, partially offset by a loss on the change in the mark-to-market values of the Company's Debentures of $0.99 million.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Funding of major business and property acquisitions

Over the past ~~four~~five years the Company has funded major business and property acquisitions with capital provided by issuance of its Common Shares. In 2012 Titan Uranium Inc. and the US Mining Division of Denison were acquired, in 2013 Strathmore Minerals Corp. was acquired and in 2015 Uranerz was acquired, each in exchange for newly issued shares. ~~The~~

In October 2013, the Company ~~intends to continue to acquire assets utilizing Common Shares when it can be done under attractive terms.~~

acquired a 60% interest in Roca Honda. On May 27, 2016, the Company completed the purchase of the remaining 40% interest in Roca Honda from Sumitomo, ~~through~~which is now 100% owned and controlled by the ~~issuance of~~Company. As consideration for the 40% interest, the Company issued 1.21 million shares as well as an additional $4.5 million of cash payable upon first commencement of commercial mining extraction.

Additionally, on June 16, 2016, the Company completed the asset acquisition of Alta Mesa through the issuance of 4.55 million shares. The total transaction costs incurred through June 30, 2016 by the Company were $1.29 million, which were capitalized as part of acquiring the ~~purchase consideration.~~asset.

The Company intends to continue to acquire assets utilizing Common Shares when it can be done under attractive terms.

Cash proceeds received for shares and warrants

In the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, the Company issued ~~0.20~~3.40 million shares for net proceeds of ~~$0.53~~$7.46 million under the Company’s ATM Offering.

On March 14, 2016 an equity offering of 5.03 million units (each unit consisting of one common share and one half of one common share purchase warrant) was closed for net proceeds of $10.98 million after commissions and estimated expenses of the offering.

Additionally, on September 20, 2016 an equity offering of 8,337,500 units (each unit consisting of one common share and one half of one common share purchase warrant) was closed for net proceeds of $13.79 million after commissions and estimated expenses of the offering.

Working capital at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017 and future requirements for funds

At ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, the Company had working capital of ~~$30.64~~$34.21 million, including ~~$17.53~~$18.72 million in cash and cash equivalents and approximately ~~570,000~~370,000 pounds of finished goods inventory. The Company believes it has sufficient cash and resources to carry out its base business plan beyond ~~Q3 2017.~~June 30, 2018.

The Company is actively focused on its forward looking liquidity needs, especially in light of the current depressed uranium markets. The Company is evaluating its ongoing fixed cost structure as well as decisions related to project retention, advancement and development. If current uranium prices persist for any extended period of time, the Company will likely be required to raise capital or take other measures to fund its ongoing operations. Significant development activities, if warranted, will require that we arrange for financing in advance of planned expenditures. In addition, we expect to continue to augment our current financial resources with external financing as our long term business needs ~~require.~~require none of which can be assured.

The Company manages liquidity risk through the management of its capital structure.

~~Additional Collateral to be Deposited as Collateral for Surety Bonds~~

During the three months ended June 30, 2016, one of the Company’s surety bond providers requested additional collateral to support surety bonds held in favor of our White Mesa Mill totaling $5.28 million to be deposited $1.76 million by July 31, 2016 (which was deposited on July 29, 2016), $1.76 million by November 30, 2016 and $1.76 million by February 28, 2017.

Debenture Maturity

The Company currently has 22,000 floating-rate convertible unsecured subordinated debentures originally maturing June 30, 2017 (the “Debentures”) (each Debenture having a principal amount of Cdn$1,000). On August 4, 2016, the following amendments were made to the Debentures:

the maturity date of the Debentures was extended from June 30, 2017 to December 31, 2020;

the conversion price of the Debentures was reduced from Cdn$15.00 to Cdn$4.15 per Common Share of the Company;

a redemption provision was added that enables the Company to redeem the Debentures, in cash, in whole or in part, at any time after June 30, 2019, but prior to maturity, at a price of 101% of the aggregate principal amount redeemed;

a right in favor of each Debentureholder was added to enable the Debentureholder to require the Company to purchase, for cash, on June 30, 2017 (the original maturity date) up to 20% of the Debentures held by the Debentureholder at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount tendered; and

certain other amendments were made to the Debenture Indenture as required by the U.S. Trust Indenture Act of 1939, along with certain other amendments to remove provisions of the Indenture that no longer apply.

Subject to any required regulatory approval and provided no event of default has occurred and is continuing, the Company has the option to satisfy its obligation to repay the Debentures, in whole or in part, at maturity, upon at least 40 days and not more than 60 days prior notice, by delivering that number of Common Shares obtained by dividing the principal amount of the Debentures maturing by 95% of the volume-weighted average trading price of the common shares on the TSX during the 20 consecutive trading days ending five trading days preceding the maturity date.

In the six months ended June 30, 2017, the Debentureholders elected to redeem Cdn$1.13 million ($0.87 million) under this right, and the Company has completed the buy back. No additional purchases are allowed under this right.

Cash and cash ~~flow~~flows

~~Nine~~Six months ended ~~September~~June 30, 2017

Cash and cash equivalents were $18.72 million at June 30, 2017, compared to $16.90 million at December 31, 2016. The increase of $1.82 million was due primarily to cash provided by financing activities of $5.37 million, cash partially provided by investing activities of $0.39 million and gain on foreign exchange on cash held in foreign currencies of $0.05 million offset by cash used in operations of $3.99 million.

Net cash provided by financing activities totaled $5.37 million consisting primarily of $7.46 million proceeds from the issuance of stock in the ATM Offering and $0.37 million in cash received from non-controlling interest partially offset by $2.46 million to repay loans and borrowings.

Net cash provided by investing activities was $0.39 million and was due to cash refunds related to cash deposited with regulatory agencies. This refund was a result of the Company's decision to change surety providers.

Net cash used in operating activities of $3.99 million is comprised of the net loss of $15.08 million for the period adjusted for non-cash items and for changes in working capital items. Significant items not involving cash were $3.69 million of depreciation and amortization of property, plant and equipment, $1.78 million of stock-based compensation, $1.96 million impairment in inventories, $3.60 million impairment of assets held for sale, a change in the value of the convertible debentures of $0.78 million, a $0.74 million miscellaneous non-cash expense, $0.69 million accretion of asset retirement obligation, a $3.68 million decrease in inventories, a $0.23 million decrease in prepaid expenses and other assets, offset by a $3.12 million increase in trade and other receivables and a $1.73 million decrease in accounts payable and accrued liabilities, a loss on the value of the warrant liabilities of $0.85 million, an unrealized foreign exchange loss of $0.18 million and $0.54 million in cash paid for reclamation and remediation activities.

Six months ended June 30, 2016

Cash and cash equivalents were ~~$17.53~~$14.42 million at ~~September~~June 30, 2016, compared to $12.97 million at December 31, 2015. The increase of ~~$4.56~~$1.45 million was due primarily to cash provided by financing activities of ~~$22.96~~$9.90 million partially offset by cash used by investing activities of ~~$4.52~~$2.53 million and cash used in operations of ~~$13.97~~$6.20 million and gain on foreign exchange on cash held in foreign currencies of ~~$0.10~~$0.29 million.

Net cash provided by financing activities totaled ~~$22.96~~$9.90 million consisting primarily of ~~$25.29~~$11.50 million proceeds from the issuance of stock in the March 2016 ~~and September 2016~~ public ~~offerings~~offering and the ATM Offering partially offset by ~~$2.39~~$1.61 million to repay loans and borrowings.

Net cash used by investing activities was ~~$4.52~~$2.53 million, which was primarily related to expenditures for the Alta Mesa acquisition ~~net~~transaction costs of ~~cash acquired of $1.29~~$1.23 million and cash expenditures related to additional cash deposited with regulatory agencies for asset retirement obligations related to the acquisition of ~~$4.12~~Alta Mesa of $2.15 million and related reclamation costs offset by cash received from the sale of mineral properties held for sale of $0.85 million.

Net cash used in operating activities of ~~$13.97~~$6.20 million is comprised of the net loss of ~~$27.55~~$19.31 million for the period adjusted for non-cash items and for changes in working capital items. Significant items not involving cash were ~~$3.65~~$2.59 million of depreciation and amortization of property, plant and equipment, ~~$3.00~~$1.62 million impairment on inventory, a ~~$4.42~~$7.68 million decrease in inventories, ~~$2.22~~$2.21 million decrease in trade and other receivables offset by a ~~$1.06~~$2.72 million decrease in accounts payable and accrued liabilities and a ~~$1.82~~$1.17 million miscellaneous non-cash income.

~~Nine months ended September 30, 2015~~

Cash and cash equivalents were $17.74 million at September 30, 2015, compared to $10.41 million at December 31, 2014. The increase of $7.47 million was due primarily to cash from operations of $4.78 million and cash from investing activities of $3.11 million partially offset by cash from financing activities of $0.41 million and loss on foreign exchange on cash held of $0.14 million.

Net cash used in investing activities was $3.11 million, which was primarily related to the release of cash deposited with regulatory agencies of $5.27 million, the $2.46 million cash acquired in the acquisition of Uranerz offset by expenditures for property, plant and equipment of $4.62 million.

Net cash from financing activities was $0.41 million, which primarily consisted of payments on loans and borrowings of $0.78 million partially offset with $0.18 million of proceeds from the issue of shares for options and warrant exercised.

Net cash from operating activities of $4.78 million is comprised of the net loss of $10.66 million for the period adjusted for non-cash items and for changes in working capital items. Significant items not involving cash were $3.65 million of depreciation and amortization of property, plant and equipment, $2.98 million miscellaneous non-cash expenses primarily related to the Uranerz acquisition completed in 2015, $3.57 million decrease in inventories, offset by a $0.11 million increase in trade and other receivables.

Critical accounting estimates and judgments

The preparation of these consolidated financial statements in accordance with US GAAP requires the use of certain critical accounting estimates and judgments that affect the amounts reported. It also requires management to exercise judgment in applying the Company’s accounting policies. These judgments and estimates are based on management’s best knowledge of the relevant facts and circumstances taking into account previous experience. Although the Company regularly reviews the estimates and judgments made that affect these financial statements, actual results may be materially different.

Significant estimates made by management include:


a.	Exploration stage

SEC Industry Guide 7 defines a reserve as “that part of a mineral deposit which could be economically and legally extracted or produced at the time of the reserve determination”. The classification of a reserve must be evidenced by a bankable feasibility study using the latest three-year price average. While the Company has established the existence of mineral resources and has successfully extracted and recovered saleable uranium from certain of these resources, the Company has not established proven or probable reserves, as defined under SEC Industry Guide 7, for these operations or any of its uranium projects. As a result, the Company is in the Exploration Stage as defined under Industry Guide 7. Furthermore, the Company has no plans to establish proven or probable reserves for any of its uranium projects.

While in the Exploration Stage, among other things, the Company must expense all amounts that would normally be capitalized and subsequently depreciated or depleted over the life of the mining operation on properties that have proven or probable reserves. Items such as the construction of wellfields and related header houses, additions to our recovery facilities and advancement of properties will all be expensed in the period incurred. As a result, the Company’s consolidated financial statements may not be directly comparable to the financial statements of mining companies in the development or production stages.


b.	Resource estimates

The Company utilizes estimates of its mineral resources based on information compiled by appropriately qualified persons. The information relating to the geological data on the size, depth and shape of the ore body requires complex geological judgments to interpret the data. The estimation of future cash flows related to resources is based upon factors such as estimates of future uranium prices, future construction and operating costs along with geological assumptions and judgments made in estimating the size and grade of the resource. Changes in the mineral resource estimates may impact the carrying value of mining and recovery assets, goodwill, reclamation and remediation obligations and depreciation and impairment.


c.	Valuation of mining and recovery assets in a business combination

We value assets in a business combination based on our estimates of the fair value of the mining and recovery assets acquired.

For mining and recovery assets actively extracting and recovering uranium as well as those assets that we expect to extract uranium from, we value the assets based on the income approach. As we have not acquired proven or probable reserves, as defined by SEC Industry Guide 7, in our business combinations, the value ascribed to these assets is based on our estimates of value beyond proven and probable reserves. The value is calculated based, in part, on technical reports prepared under NI 43-101. Our estimates of extraction and recovery activities and related timing of extraction and recovery as well as the costs involved are demonstrated by at least a preliminary economic assessment. We then adjust the results of the technical reports to include the effects of anticipated fluctuations in the future market price of uranium consistent with what we believe to be the expectations of other market participants as well as any expected operational or cost changes that we expect in the future operations of these mining assets. These cash flow estimates include the estimated cash outflows to develop, extract and recover the estimated saleable U3O8 from these operations.

For mining assets that will be held for further evaluation or for sale, we use the market approach utilizing implied transaction multiples from historical uranium transactions.


d.	Valuation of mining assets acquired other than in a business combination

The costs of mining assets that are acquired in an asset purchase transaction are recorded as plant and equipment on the date of purchase based on the consideration given up for the assets. If multiple assets are involved in a transaction, the consideration is allocated based on the relative values of the properties acquired.


e.	Depreciation of mining and recovery assets acquired

For mining and recovery assets actively extracting and recovering uranium we depreciate the acquisition costs of the mining and recovery assets on a straight line basis over our estimated lives of the mining and recovery assets. The process of estimating the useful life of the mining and recovery assets requires significant judgment in evaluating and assessing available geological, geophysical, engineering and economic data, projected rates of extraction and recovery, estimated commodity price forecasts and the timing of future expenditures, all of which are, by their very nature, subject to interpretation and uncertainty.

Changes in these estimates may materially impact the carrying value of the Company’s mining and recovery assets and the recorded amount of depreciation.


f.	Business combinations

Management uses judgment in applying the acquisition method of accounting for business combinations and in determining fair values of the identifiable assets and liabilities acquired. The value placed on the acquired assets and liabilities, including identifiable intangible assets, will have an effect on the amount of goodwill or bargain purchase gain that the Company may record on an

acquisition. Changes in economic conditions, commodity prices and other factors between the date that an acquisition is announced and when it finally is consummated can have a material difference on the allocation used to record a preliminary purchase price allocation versus the final purchase price allocation which can take up to one year after acquisition to complete. See b. above for information related to the valuation of mining and recovery assets in this process.


g.	Impairment testing of mining and recovery assets

The Company undertakes a review of the carrying values of its mining and recovery assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying values may exceed their estimated net recoverable amounts determined by reference to estimated future operating results and net cash flows. An impairment loss is recognized when the carrying value of a mining or recovery asset is not recoverable based on this analysis. In undertaking this review, the management of the Company is required to make significant estimates of, among other things, future production and sale volumes, forecast commodity prices, future operating and capital costs and reclamation costs to the end of the mining asset’s life. These estimates are subject to various risks and uncertainties, which may ultimately have an effect on the expected recoverability of the carrying values of mining and recovery assets.


h.	Asset retirement obligations

Asset retirement obligations are recorded as a liability when an asset that will require reclamation and remediation is initially acquired. For disturbances created on a property owned that will require future reclamation and remediation the Company records asset retirement obligations for such disturbance when occurred. The Company has accrued its best estimate of its share of the cost to decommission its mining and milling properties in accordance with existing laws, contracts and other policies. The estimate of future costs involves a number of estimates relating to timing, type of costs, mine closure plans, and review of potential methods and technical advancements. Furthermore, due to uncertainties concerning environmental remediation, the ultimate cost of the Company’s decommissioning liability could differ from amounts provided. The estimate of the Company’s obligation is subject to change due to amendments to applicable laws and regulations and as new information concerning the Company’s operations becomes available. The Company is not able to determine the impact on its financial position, if any, of environmental laws and regulations that may be enacted in the future. Additionally, the expected cash flows in the future are discounted at the Company’s estimated cost of capital based on the periods the Company expects to complete the reclamation and remediation activities. Differences in the expected periods of reclamation or in the discount rates used could have a material difference in the actual settlement of the obligations compared with the amounts provided.


i.	Determination whether an acquisition represents a business combination or asset purchase

Management determines whether an acquisition represent a business combination or asset purchase by considering the stage of exploration and development and status of an acquired operation. Consideration is given to whether the acquired properties include mineral reserves or mineral resources, in addition to the permitting required and results of economic assessments.

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

Inventory

In July 2015, ASU 2015-11 was issued related to inventory which simplifies the subsequent measurement of inventories by replacing the lower of cost or market test with a lower of cost and net realizable value test. The update is effective in fiscal years, including interim periods, beginning after December 15, 2016, and early adoption is permitted. Adoption of this guidance, effective October 1, 2016, had no impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements or disclosures.

Stock-based compensation

In March 2016, ASU No. 2016-09 was issued related to stock-based compensation. The new guidance simplifies the accounting for stock-based compensation transactions, including income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities and classification on the statement of cash flows. This update is effective in fiscal years, including interim periods, beginning after December 15, 2016 and early adoption is permitted. Adoption of this guidance, effective October 1, 2016 had no impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements or disclosures.

Deferred income taxes

In November 2015, the ASU 2015-17 related to the presentation of deferred income taxes in the statement of financial position by requiring that deferred tax liabilities and assets be classified as noncurrent. The update is effective in fiscal years, including

interim periods beginning on or after December 15, 2016. Adoption of this guidance, effective January 1, 2017 had no impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements or disclosures as the Company has a full valuation allowance posted against the deferred tax assets as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted

In addition to the new and revised standards and amendments issued prior to 2017 for which the Company is evaluating implementation effects, as disclosed in our annual Consolidated financial statements, the FASB issued the following new and revised standards and amendments, which are not yet effective which may have future applicability to the Company:

Investments

Leases

Financial instruments

Revenue recognition

In May 2014, ASU 2014-09 was issued related to revenue from contracts with customers. The new standard requires revenue to be recognized based on the amount an entity is expected to be entitled to for promised goods or services provided to customers. The standard also requires expanded disclosures regarding contracts with customers. The guidance in this standard supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in Topic 605, "Revenue Recognition", and most industry-specific guidance. formation and addresses certain aspects of the recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of financial instruments. The update is effective in fiscal years, including interim periods beginning on or after December 15, 2017, and will be applied retrospectively. We are analyzing our sales contracts in order to evaluate the impact on the financial statements.

Business combinations

In January 2017, ASU No. 2017-01 was issued related to business combinations. The new guidance requires entities to go through a "screen" when determining whether an integrated set of assets and activities constitutes a business.The screen requires entities to compare the fair value of gross assets acquired to the fair value of a single identifiable asset or group of similar identifiable assets. If substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired is concentrated in the single identifiable assets or group of similar identifiable assets, the integrated set of assets and activities is not a business. This update is effective in fiscal years, including interim periods, beginning after December 15, 2017, and early adoption is not permitted. The Company is currently evaluating this guidance and the impact it will have on the financial statements.

Restricted Cash

In November 2016, ASU No. 2016-18 was issued related to the inclusion of restricted cash in the statement of cash flows. This new guidance requires that a statement of cash flows explain the change during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. This update is effective in fiscal years, including interim periods, beginning after December 15, 2017 and early adoption is permitted. The adoption of this guidance will result in the inclusion of the restricted cash balances within the overall cash balance and removal of the changes in restricted cash activity,

which are currently recognized in Other financing activities, on the Statements of Consolidated Cash Flows. Furthermore, an additional reconciliation will be required to reconcile Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash reported within the Consolidated Balance Sheets to sum to the total shown in the Statements of Consolidated Cash Flows. The Company is currently evaluating this guidance and the impact it will have on the financial statements.

Statement of cash flows

In August 2016, ASU No. 2016-15 was issued related to the statement of cash flows. This new guidance addresses eight specific cash flow issues with the objective of reducing the existing diversity in practice in how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows. This update is effective in fiscal years, including interim periods, beginning after December 15, 2017 and early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating this guidance and the impact it will have on the financial statements.

Stock compensation

In May 2017, ASU No. 2017-09 was issued related to share-based payment award modifications. This update provides guidance about which changes to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award require an entity to apply modification accounting in Topic 718. This update is effective in fiscal years, including interim periods, beginning after December 15, 2017 and early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating this guidance and the impact it will have on the financial statements.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

The Company is exposed to risks associated with commodity prices, interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates and credit. Commodity price risk is defined as the potential loss that we may incur as a result of changes in the market value of uranium. Interest rate risk results from our debt and equity instruments that we issue to provide financing and liquidity for our business. The foreign currency exchange risk relates to the risk that the value of financial commitments, recognized assets or liabilities will fluctuate due to changes in foreign currency rates. Credit risk arises from the extension of credit throughout all aspects of our business. Industry-wide risks can also affect our general ability to finance exploration, and development of exploitable resources; such effects are not predictable or quantifiable. Market risk is the risk to the Company of adverse financial impact due to change in the fair value or future cash flows of financial instruments as a result of fluctuations in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates.

Commodity Price Risk

The Company is subject to market risk related to the market price of U3O8. Our four long-term supply contracts contain favorable pricing above current spot prices; however, these long term prices cover only a portion of our planned uranium recovery. Additionally final deliveries under one of the contracts ~~will be~~was completed in the quarter ending December 31, 2016 and one other contract will be completed in 2017. Revenue beyond our current contracts will be affected by both spot and long-term U3O8 price fluctuations which are affected by factors beyond our control, including: the demand for nuclear power; political and economic conditions; governmental legislation in uranium producing and consuming countries; and production levels and costs of production of other producing companies. The Company continuously monitors the market to determine its level of extraction and recovery of uranium in the future.

Interest Rate Risk

The Company is exposed to interest rate risk on its cash equivalents, deposits, restricted cash, and debt. Our interest earned is not material; thus not subject to significant risk. Our Wyoming Industrial Development Revenue Bond has a fixed interest rate over its remaining four-year life, removing variability. The Company is exposed to an interest rate risk associated with its convertible debentures (the “Debentures”), which is based on the spot market price of U3O8. These Debentures mature in December 2020. The Company does not expect the spot market price of U3O8 to exceed $54.99 prior to the Debentures’ maturity and, accordingly, does not believe there is any significant interest rate risk related to these Debentures. The Company does not use derivatives to manage interest rate risk. The following chart displays the interest rate applicable to our Debentures at various U3O8 price levels.



UxC U3O8 Weekly Indicator Price	Annual Interest Rate
Up to $54.99	8.5%
$55.00–$59.99	9%
$60.00–$64.99	9.5%
$65.00–$69.99	10%
$70.00–$74.99	10.5%
$75.00–$79.99	11%
$80.00–$84.99	11.5%
$85.00–$89.99	12%
$90.00–$94.99	12.5%
$95.00–$99.99	13%
$100 and above	13.5%

Currency Risk

The foreign exchange risk relates to the risk that the value of financial commitments, recognized assets or liabilities will fluctuate due to changes in foreign currency rates. The Company does not use any derivative instruments to reduce its exposure to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. As the US Dollar is the functional currency of our U.S. operations, the currency risk has been reduced. We maintain a nominal balance in foreign currency, resulting in a low currency risk relative to our cash balances. Our Debentures are denominated in Canadian Dollars and, accordingly, are exposed to currency risk.

The following table summarizes, in United States dollar equivalents, the Company’s major foreign currency (Cdn$) exposures as of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017 ($000):


Cash and cash equivalents	$	1,354		$	7,695
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	(704		)	(758		)
Loans and borrowings	(16,101		)	(16,953		)
Total	$	(15,451	)	$	(10,016	)

The table below summarizes a sensitivity analysis for significant unsettled currency risk exposure with respect to our financial instruments as at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017 with all other variables held constant. It shows how net income would have been affected by changes in the relevant risk variables that were reasonably possible at that date.

('000s)

Change for

Sensitivity Analysis

Increase (decrease) in other comprehensive income

Change for

Sensitivity Analysis

Increase (decrease) in other comprehensive income

+1% change in

U.S.

Strengthening net earnings

dollar

(203

)

dollar

(130

)

-1% change in U.S.

Weakening net earnings

dollar

203

dollar

130

Credit Risk

Credit risk relates to cash and cash equivalents, trade, and other receivables that arise from the possibility that any counterparty to an instrument fails to perform. The Company only transacts with highly-rated counterparties and a limit on contingent exposure has been established for any counterparty based on that counterparty’s credit rating. The Company’s sales are attributable mainly to multinational utilities. As at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, the Company’s maximum exposure to credit risk was the carrying value of cash and cash equivalents, trade receivables and taxes recoverable.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

Disclosure Controls and Procedures.

At the end of the period covered by this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, an evaluation was carried out under the supervision of and with the participation of our management, including the Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), of the effectiveness of the design and operations of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and Rule 15d-15(e) under the United States Securities Exchange ~~Act)~~Act of 1934, as amended ("The Exchange Act"). Based on that evaluation, the CEO and the CFO have concluded that as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective in ensuring that: (i) information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit to the SEC under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in applicable rules and forms and (ii) material information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our CEO and CFO, as appropriate, to allow for accurate and timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

We are not aware of any material pending or threatened litigation or of any proceedings known to be contemplated by governmental authorities that are, or would be, likely to have a material adverse effect upon us or our operations, taken as a whole that was not disclosed in the Company's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2015,~~2016, as filed with the SEC ondated March ~~15, 2016.~~9, 2017.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS.

There have been no material changes from the risk factors set forth in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016 as filed with the SEC ondated March ~~15, 2016.~~9, 2017.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS.

None.

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES.

None.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURE.

The mine safety disclosures required by section 1503(a) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and Item 104 of Regulation S-K are included in Exhibit 95.1 of this Quarterly Report, which is incorporated by reference into this Item 4.

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION.

None.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS.

Exhibits

The following exhibits are filed as part of this report:



Exhibit
Number	Description
~~2.1~~	~~Agreement and Plan of Merger by and among Uranerz Energy Corporation, Energy Fuels, Inc. and EFR Nevada Corp., dated January 4, 2015 (1)~~
~~2.2~~	~~Amendment to the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated May 8, 2015 (1)~~
~~2.3~~	~~Membership Interest Purchase Agreement by and among Energy Fuels Inc., Energy Fuels Holdings Corp., Mesteña LLC, Jones Ranch Minerals Unproven, Ltd. And Mesteña Unproven Ltd. dated March 4, 2016 (2)~~
3.1	Articles of Continuance dated September 2, 2005 ~~(3)~~(1)
3.2	Articles of Amendment dated May 26, 2006 ~~(4)~~(2)
3.3	Bylaws ~~(5)~~(3)
4.1	The Amended and Restated Convertible Debenture Indenture dated August 4, 2016 between Energy Fuels Inc., BNY Trust Company of Canada and the Bank of New York Mellon providing for the issuance of debentures ~~(6)~~(4)
4.2	Financing Agreement between Uranerz Energy Corp. and Johnson County dated November 26, 2013 ~~(7)~~(5)
4.3	Bond Purchase Agreement among the State of Wyoming, Johnson County and Uranerz Energy Corp. dated November 12, 2013 ~~(8)~~(6)
4.4	Promissory Note dated November 26, 2013 ~~(9)~~(7)
4.5	Mortgage and Security Agreement and Assignment between Uranerz Energy Corp. and the Trustee dated November 26, 2013 ~~(10)~~


	(8)
4.6	Shareholder Rights Plan ~~(11)~~(9)
4.7	Warrant Indenture between Energy Fuels Inc. and CST Trust Co. providing for the issue of common share purchase warrants dated March 14, 2016 ~~(12)~~(10)
4.8	First Supplemental Indenture among Energy Fuels Inc., CST Trust Company and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC dated April 14, 2016 ~~(13)~~(11)
4.9	Warrant Indenture between Energy Fuels Inc., CST Trust Company and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC dated September 20, 2016 ~~(14)~~
~~10.1~~	~~Energy Fuels 2013 Amended and Restated Stock Option Plan (15)~~
~~10.2~~	~~Energy Fuels Omnibus Compensation Plan (16)~~
~~10.3~~	~~Sales Agreement between Energy Fuels Inc. and Cantor Fitzgerald & Co. dated September 29, 2015 (17)~~
~~10.4~~	~~Form of Indemnity Agreement between Energy Fuels and its officers and directors (18)~~
~~10.5~~	~~Amended and Restated Employment Agreement among Energy Fuels Inc., Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc., and Stephen P. Antony dated August 4, 2016 (19)~~
~~10.6~~	~~Employment Agreement between Energy Fuels Inc. and David C. Frydenlund dated March 11, 2016 (20)~~
~~10.7~~	~~Employment Agreement between Energy Fuels Inc. and W. Paul Goranson dated March 11, 2016 (21)~~
~~10.8~~	~~Employment Agreement between Energy Fuels Inc. and Harold R. Roberts dated March 11, 2016 (22)~~
~~10.9~~	~~Employment Agreement between Energy Fuels Inc. and Daniel G. Zang dated March 11, 2016 (23)~~
~~10.11~~	~~Employment Agreement between Energy Fuels Inc. and Mark S. Chalmers dated April 14, 2016 (24)~~(12)
21.1	Subsidiaries of the Registrant ~~(25)~~(13)
23.1	Consent of Stephen P. Antony
31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
95.1	Mine Safety Disclosure
101.INS	XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension – Schema
101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Extension – Calculations
101.DEF	XBRL Taxonomy Extension – Definitions
101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Extension – Labels
101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Extension – Presentations



(1)	~~Incorporated by reference to Schedule B of Exhibit 99.1 of Energy Fuels’ Form 6-K filed with the SEC on May 26, 2015.~~


~~(2)~~	~~Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Energy Fuels’ Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 8, 2016.~~


~~(3)~~	Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of Energy Fuels’ Form F-4 filed with the SEC on May 8, 2015.


~~(4)~~(2)	Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of Energy Fuels’ Form F-4 filed with the SEC on May 8, 2015.


~~(5)~~(3)	Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 of Energy Fuels’ Form F-4 filed with the SEC on May 8, 2015.


~~(6)~~(4)	Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of Energy Fuels' Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on August 5, 2016.


~~(7)~~(5)	Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Form 8-K filed on December 3, 2013 by Uranerz Energy Corporation.


~~(8)~~(6)	Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Form 8-K filed on December 3, 2013 by Uranerz Energy Corporation.


~~(9)~~(7)	Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Form 8-K filed on December 3, 2013 by Uranerz Energy Corporation.


~~(10)~~(8)	Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to the Form 8-K filed on December 3, 2013 by Uranerz Energy Corporation.


~~(11)~~(9)	Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to Energy Fuels’ Form F-4 filed on May 8, 2015.


~~(12)~~(10)	Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Energy Fuels’ Form 8-K filed on March 14, 2016.


~~(13)~~(11)	Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Energy Fuels’ Form 8-K filed on April 20, 2016.


~~(14)~~(12)	Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Energy Fuels' Form 8-K filed on September 20, 2016.


~~(15)~~	~~Incorporated by reference from Schedule B of Exhibit 99.84 of Energy Fuels' registration statement on Form 40-F filed with the SEC on November 15, 2013.~~


~~(16)~~	~~Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Energy Fuels’ Form S-8 filed on June 24, 2015.~~


~~(17)~~	~~Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to Energy Fuels’ Form 6-K filed on September 29, 2015.~~


~~(18)~~	~~Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of Energy Fuels’ Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 15, 2016.~~


~~(19)~~	~~Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of Energy Fuels' Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on August 5, 2016.~~


~~(20)~~	~~Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 of Energy Fuels’ Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 15, 2016.~~


~~(21)~~	~~Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 of Energy Fuels' Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 15, 2016.~~


~~(22)~~	~~Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 of Energy Fuels’ Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 15, 2016.~~


~~(23)~~	~~Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 of Energy Fuels’ Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 15, 2016.~~


~~(24)~~	~~Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to Energy Fuels’ Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on May 6, 2016.~~


~~(25)~~(13)	Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to Energy Fuels' Form T-3 filed with the SEC on July 11, 2016.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

ENERGY FUELS INC.

(Registrant)



Dated: ~~November~~August 3, ~~2016~~2017	By:	/s/ Stephen P. Antony
		Stephen P. Antony
		Chief Executive Officer

Dated: ~~November~~August 3, ~~2016~~2017	By:	/s/ Daniel G. Zang
		Daniel G. Zang
		Chief Financial Officer

4042



	Page
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS	6
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS	25
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK	3537
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES	3738
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS	3840
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS	3840
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS	3840
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES	3840
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURE	3840
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION	3840
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS	3840
SIGNATURES



Month Issued	Expiry Date	Exercise Price Cdn$	Warrants Outstanding
June 2012(1)	June 22, 2017	13.25	351,025
June 2013(1)	June 15, 2017	9.50	456,948



	Three months ended				Nine months ended
	September 30,				September 30,
	2016		2015		2016		2015
Share-based compensation	$	576	$	22	$	1,688	$	810
Replacement of options from business combinations and asset acquisitions	—		—		—		3,683
Value of stock options granted	$	576	$	22	$	1,688	$	4,493



	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2016			2015			2016			2015
Revenue	$	8,702		$	19,159		$	33,704		$	50,464
Costs and expenses applicable to revenue	4,341			11,786			20,583			29,012
Impairment of inventories	1,379			—			2,998			—
Gross Profit	2,982			7,373			10,123			21,452

Other operating costs and expenses
Development, permitting and land holding	6,252			3,934			17,138			4,636
Standby costs	647			1,015			4,178			4,335
Abandonment of mineral properties	1,005			—			1,036			—
Impairment of assets held for sale	—			2,000			—			2,000
Accretion of asset retirement obligation	175			143			526			350
Total other operating costs and expenses	8,079			7,092			22,878			11,321

Selling, general & administration
Selling costs	47			40			216			199
Intangible asset amortization	583			1,772			3,021			3,572
General and administration	3,815			3,887			11,928			9,223
Costs directly attributable to acquisitions	—			190			—			6,777
Total selling, general & administration	4,445			5,889			15,165			19,771

Total Operating Loss	(9,542		)	(5,608		)	(27,920		)	(9,640		)
Interest expense	(573		)	(625		)	(1,734		)	(1,391		)
Other (expense) income	1,870			838			2,103			373
Net loss	$	(8,245	)	$	(5,395	)	$	(27,551	)	$	(10,658	)

Basic and diluted loss per share	$	(0.14	)	$	(0.12	)	$	(0.51	)	$	(0.36	)