UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

______________________________________________________

FORM 10-Q

______________________________________________________

(Mark One)



x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended November ~~27, 2016~~26, 2017



¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number: 1-7275

________

CONAGRA BRANDS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

______________________________________________________



Delaware		47-0248710
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

222 W. Merchandise Mart Plaza, Suite 1300 Chicago, Illinois		60654
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

(312) 549-5000

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

______________________________________________________

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the ~~definition~~definitions of ~~“large~~"large accelerated filer,~~” “accelerated filer”~~" "accelerated filer," "smaller reporting company" and ~~“smaller reporting company”~~"emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer x Accelerated filer ¨ Non-accelerated filer ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)



~~Large accelerated filer~~	x		~~Accelerated filer~~	¨

~~Non-accelerated filer~~	¨	~~(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)~~	~~Smaller reporting company~~	¨

Smaller reporting company ¨ Emerging growth company ¨

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

Number of shares outstanding of issuer’s common stock, as of November ~~27, 2016~~,26, 2017, was ~~435,212,410.~~400,660,848.

Table of Contents



Part I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION		1
Item 1	Financial Statements	1
	Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of ~~Operations~~Earnings for the Thirteen and Twenty-six Weeks ended November ~~27, 2016~~26, 2017 and November ~~29, 2015~~27, 2016	1
	Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income ~~(Loss)~~ for the Thirteen and Twenty-six Weeks ended November ~~27, 2016~~26, 2017 and November ~~29, 2015~~27, 2016	2
	Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of November ~~27, 2016~~26, 2017 and May ~~29, 2016~~28, 2017	3
	Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Twenty-six Weeks ended November ~~27, 2016~~26, 2017 and November ~~29, 2015~~27, 2016	4
	Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	5
Item 2	Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	2627
Item 3	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	3940
Item 4	Controls and Procedures	4041
Part II. OTHER INFORMATION		4142
Item 1	Legal Proceedings	4142
Item 1A	Risk Factors	4142
Item 2	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	4243
Item 6	Exhibits	4244
Signatures		4345
Exhibit ~~Index~~10.2.4
Exhibit ~~10.2~~10.4.8
Exhibit 10.31.1
Exhibit 12
Exhibit 31.1
Exhibit 31.2
Exhibit 32.1
Exhibit ~~101.1~~101

PART I ~~��~~— FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Conagra Brands, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Statements of ~~Operations~~Earnings

(in millions except per share amounts)

(unaudited)


	Thirteen weeks ended				Twenty-six weeks ended					Thirteen weeks ended				Twenty-six weeks ended
	November 27, 2016		November 29, 2015		November 27, 2016		November 29, 2015			November 26, 2017		November 27, 2016		November 26, 2017		November 27, 2016
Net sales	$	2,088.4	$	2,358.8	$	3,984.0	$	4,411.8		$	2,173.4	$	2,088.4	$	3,977.6	$	3,984.0
Costs and expenses:
Cost of goods sold	1,440.9		1,690.8		2,791.9		3,182.5			1,515.1		1,440.9		2,800.3		2,791.9
Selling, general and administrative expenses	417.9		483.2		649.6		846.0			307.3		417.9		546.3		649.6
Interest expense, net	54.1		79.2		112.3		159.3			38.0		54.1		74.4		112.3
Income from continuing operations before income taxes and equity method investment earnings	175.5		105.6		430.2		224.0			313.0		175.5		556.6		430.2
Income tax expense	78.4		43.1		247.6		92.4			109.5		78.4		229.5		247.6
Equity method investment earnings	17.2		17.6		30.3		42.1			20.6		17.2		50.6		30.3
Income from continuing operations	114.3		80.1		212.9		173.7			224.1		114.3		377.7		212.9
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax	11.6		79.2		103.0		(1,166.8		)
Net income (loss)	$	125.9	$	159.3	$	315.9	$	(993.1	)
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax										0.4		11.6		0.1		103.0
Net income										$	224.5	$	125.9	$	377.8	$	315.9
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests	3.8		4.4		7.6		6.1			1.0		3.8		1.8		7.6
Net income (loss) attributable to Conagra Brands, Inc.	$	122.1	$	154.9	$	308.3	$	(999.2	)
Earnings (loss) per share — basic
Net income attributable to Conagra Brands, Inc.										$	223.5	$	122.1	$	376.0	$	308.3
Earnings per share — basic
Income from continuing operations attributable to Conagra Brands, Inc. common stockholders	$	0.26	$	0.18	$	0.48	$	0.40		$	0.55	$	0.26	$	0.91	$	0.48
Income (loss) from discontinued operations attributable to Conagra Brands, Inc. common stockholders	0.02		0.18		0.22		(2.71		)
Net income (loss) attributable to Conagra Brands, Inc. common stockholders	$	0.28	$	0.36	$	0.70	$	(2.31	)
Earnings (loss) per share — diluted
Income from discontinued operations attributable to Conagra Brands, Inc. common stockholders										—		0.02		—		0.22
Net income attributable to Conagra Brands, Inc. common stockholders										$	0.55	$	0.28	$	0.91	$	0.70
Earnings per share — diluted
Income from continuing operations attributable to Conagra Brands, Inc. common stockholders	$	0.26	$	0.18	$	0.48	$	0.40		$	0.54	$	0.26	$	0.91	$	0.48
Income (loss) from discontinued operations attributable to Conagra Brands, Inc. common stockholders	0.02		0.17		0.22		(2.69		)
Net income (loss) attributable to Conagra Brands, Inc. common stockholders	$	0.28	$	0.35	$	0.70	$	(2.29	)
Income from discontinued operations attributable to Conagra Brands, Inc. common stockholders										—		0.02		—		0.22
Net income attributable to Conagra Brands, Inc. common stockholders										$	0.54	$	0.28	$	0.91	$	0.70
Cash dividends declared per common share	$	0.25	$	0.25	$	0.50	$	0.50		$	0.2125	$	0.25	$	0.425	$	0.50

See ~~notes~~Notes to the ~~condensed consolidated financial statements.~~Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Conagra Brands, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income ~~(Loss)~~

(in millions)

(unaudited)


	Thirteen weeks ended																		Thirteen weeks ended
	November 27, 2016									November 29, 2015									November 26, 2017									November 27, 2016
	Pre-Tax Amount			Tax (Expense) Benefit			After-Tax Amount			Pre-Tax Amount			Tax (Expense) Benefit			After-Tax Amount			Pre-Tax Amount			Tax (Expense) Benefit			After-Tax Amount			Pre-Tax Amount			Tax (Expense) Benefit			After-Tax Amount
Net income	$	243.2		$	(117.3	)	$	125.9		$	248.3		$	(89.0	)	$	159.3		$	334.0		$	(109.5	)	$	224.5		$	243.2		$	(117.3	)	$	125.9
Other comprehensive income:
Derivative adjustments:
Unrealized derivative adjustments	2.2			(0.9		)	1.3			—			—			—			1.0			(0.4		)	0.6			2.2			(0.9		)	1.3
Reclassification for derivative adjustments included in net income																			0.1			—			0.1			—			—			—
Unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities	0.2			—			0.2			—			—			—			0.4			(0.2		)	0.2			0.2			—			0.2
Unrealized currency translation losses	(14.1		)	—			(14.1		)	(18.4		)	—			(18.4		)	(12.7		)	0.1			(12.6		)	(14.1		)	—			(14.1		)
Pension and post-employment benefit obligations:
Unrealized pension and post-employment benefit obligations	66.8			(25.6		)	41.2			—			—			—			43.4			(16.6		)	26.8			66.8			(25.6		)	41.2
Reclassification for pension and post-employment benefit obligations included in net income	(0.9		)	0.4			(0.5		)	(1.3		)	0.5			(0.8		)	(0.2		)	0.1			(0.1		)	(0.9		)	0.4			(0.5		)
Comprehensive income	297.4			(143.4		)	154.0			228.6			(88.5		)	140.1			366.0			(126.5		)	239.5			297.4			(143.4		)	154.0
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests	2.2			(0.1		)	2.1			3.7			(0.2		)	3.5			0.4			(0.4		)	—			2.2			(0.1		)	2.1
Comprehensive income attributable to Conagra Brands, Inc.	$	295.2		$	(143.3	)	$	151.9		$	224.9		$	(88.3	)	$	136.6		$	365.6		$	(126.1	)	$	239.5		$	295.2		$	(143.3	)	$	151.9


	Twenty-six weeks ended																		Twenty-six weeks ended
	November 27, 2016									November 29, 2015									November 26, 2017									November 27, 2016
	Pre-Tax Amount			Tax (Expense) Benefit			After-Tax Amount			Pre-Tax Amount			Tax (Expense) Benefit			After-Tax Amount			Pre-Tax Amount			Tax (Expense) Benefit			After-Tax Amount			Pre-Tax Amount			Tax (Expense) Benefit			After-Tax Amount
Net income (loss)	$	651.2		$	(335.3	)	$	315.9		$	(1,291.2	)	$	298.1		$	(993.1	)
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Net income																			$	607.4		$	(229.6	)	$	377.8		$	651.2		$	(335.3	)	$	315.9
Other comprehensive income:
Derivative adjustments:
Unrealized derivative adjustments	(5.8		)	2.2			(3.6		)	—			—			—			1.0			(0.4		)	0.6			(5.8		)	2.2			(3.6		)
Reclassification for derivative adjustments included in net income																			0.1			—			0.1			—			—			—
Unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities	0.4			(0.1		)	0.3			—			—			—			0.7			(0.3		)	0.4			0.4			(0.1		)	0.3
Unrealized currency translation losses	(26.0		)	0.2			(25.8		)	(56.0		)	—			(56.0		)
Unrealized currency translation gains (losses)																			19.9			—			19.9			(26.0		)	0.2			(25.8		)
Pension and post-employment benefit obligations:
Unrealized pension and post-employment benefit obligations	64.7			(25.5		)	39.2			6.6			(1.6		)	5.0			43.5			(16.6		)	26.9			64.7			(25.5		)	39.2
Reclassification for pension and post-employment benefit obligations included in net income	(1.8		)	0.7			(1.1		)	(2.6		)	1.0			(1.6		)	(0.3		)	0.1			(0.2		)	(1.8		)	0.7			(1.1		)
Comprehensive income (loss)	682.7			(357.8		)	324.9			(1,343.2		)	297.5			(1,045.7		)
Comprehensive income																			672.3			(246.8		)	425.5			682.7			(357.8		)	324.9
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests	6.0			(0.2		)	5.8			2.6			(0.5		)	2.1			2.4			(0.6		)	1.8			6.0			(0.2		)	5.8
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Conagra Brands, Inc.	$	676.7		$	(357.6	)	$	319.1		$	(1,345.8	)	$	298.0		$	(1,047.8	)
Comprehensive income attributable to Conagra Brands, Inc.																			$	669.9		$	(246.2	)	$	423.7		$	676.7		$	(357.6	)	$	319.1

See ~~notes~~Notes to the ~~condensed consolidated financial statements.~~Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Conagra Brands, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

(in millions except share data)

(unaudited)


	November 27, 2016			May 29, 2016			November 26, 2017			May 28, 2017
ASSETS
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	1,442.5		$	798.1		$	84.0		$	251.4
Receivables, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $4.1 and $3.2	699.5			650.1
Receivables, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $3.4 and $3.1							683.8			563.4
Inventories	1,113.7			1,083.2			1,059.2			934.2
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	89.3			148.6			183.5			228.7
Current assets of discontinued operations	—			779.7
Current assets held for sale	—			117.0			45.8			35.5
Total current assets	3,345.0			3,576.7			2,056.3			2,013.2
Property, plant and equipment	4,229.7			4,213.3			4,236.8			4,261.9
Less accumulated depreciation	(2,560.4		)	(2,511.7		)	(2,594.8		)	(2,606.9		)
Property, plant and equipment, net	1,669.3			1,701.6			1,642.0			1,655.0
Goodwill	4,248.7			4,396.2			4,457.0			4,301.1
Brands, trademarks and other intangibles, net	1,260.9			1,237.2			1,298.2			1,229.3
Other assets	899.4			905.5			846.1			790.6
Noncurrent assets of discontinued operations	—			1,339.3
Noncurrent assets held for sale	1.7			234.1			100.5			107.1
	$	11,425.0		$	13,390.6		$	10,400.1		$	10,096.3
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities
Notes payable	$	6.7		$	13.9		$	67.1		$	28.2
Current installments of long-term debt	231.0			559.4			198.8			199.0
Accounts payable	784.1			706.7			886.7			773.1
Accrued payroll	124.9			220.8			131.9			167.6
Other accrued liabilities	598.7			567.7			565.8			552.6
Current liabilities of discontinued operations	—			409.2
Current liabilities held for sale	—			54.7
Total current liabilities	1,745.4			2,532.4			1,850.3			1,720.5
Senior long-term debt, excluding current installments	3,018.4			4,685.5			3,065.9			2,573.3
Subordinated debt	195.9			195.9			195.9			195.9
Other noncurrent liabilities	1,938.5			1,875.7			1,501.5			1,528.8
Noncurrent liabilities of discontinued operations	—			304.8
Noncurrent liabilities held for sale	—			1.5
Total liabilities	6,898.2			9,595.8			6,613.6			6,018.5
Commitments and contingencies (Note 13)
Common stockholders' equity
Common stock of $5 par value, authorized 1,200,000,000 shares; issued 567,907,172	2,839.7			2,839.7			2,839.7			2,839.7
Additional paid-in capital	1,158.0			1,136.3			1,166.8			1,171.9
Retained earnings	4,077.3			3,218.3			4,464.3			4,247.0
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	(333.7		)	(344.5		)	(165.2		)	(212.9		)
Less treasury stock, at cost, 132,694,762 and 129,842,206 common shares	(3,294.6		)	(3,136.2		)
Less treasury stock, at cost, 167,246,324 and 151,387,209 common shares							(4,607.9		)	(4,054.9		)
Total Conagra Brands, Inc. common stockholders' equity	4,446.7			3,713.6			3,697.7			3,990.8
Noncontrolling interests	80.1			81.2			88.8			87.0
Total stockholders' equity	4,526.8			3,794.8			3,786.5			4,077.8
	$	11,425.0		$	13,390.6		$	10,400.1		$	10,096.3

See ~~notes~~Notes to the ~~condensed consolidated financial statements.~~Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Conagra Brands, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(in millions)

(unaudited)

Twenty-six weeks ended
November 27,
2016 November 29,
2015
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss) $ 315.9
$ (993.1 )
Income (loss) from discontinued operations 103.0
(1,166.8 )
Income from continuing operations 212.9
173.7
Adjustments to reconcile income from continuing operations to net cash flows from operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization 133.5
141.2
Asset impairment charges 211.9
1.7
Gain on divestitures (197.5 ) —
Loss on extinguishment of debt 60.6
—
Lease cancellation expense —
48.5
Earnings of affiliates in excess of distributions (23.4 ) (41.6 )
Share-based payments expense 18.3
16.7
Contributions to pension plans (5.9 ) (6.0 )
Pension benefit (20.6 ) (7.9 )
Other items 23.9
(13.7 )
Change in operating assets and liabilities excluding effects of business acquisitions and dispositions:
Accounts receivable (49.2 ) (98.6 )
Inventory (32.2 ) (165.0 )
Deferred income taxes and income taxes payable, net 183.5
(100.2 )
Prepaid expenses and other current assets 0.2
(2.3 )
Accounts payable 71.7
(10.2 )
Accrued payroll (95.5 ) (1.7 )
Other accrued liabilities (31.6 ) 82.0
Net cash flows from operating activities — continuing operations 460.6
16.6
Net cash flows from operating activities — discontinued operations 81.6
335.5
Net cash flows from operating activities 542.2
352.1
Cash flows from investing activities:
Additions to property, plant and equipment (118.3 ) (110.4 )
Sale of property, plant and equipment 11.3
16.2
Proceeds from divestitures 489.1
—
Purchase of business and intangible assets (108.2 ) (10.1 )
Net cash flows from investing activities — continuing operations 273.9
(104.3 )
Net cash flows from investing activities — discontinued operations (123.7 ) (132.7 )
Net cash flows from investing activities 150.2
(237.0 )
Cash flows from financing activities:
Net short-term borrowings (7.2 ) 177.3
Repayment of long-term debt (555.8 ) (254.5 )
Payment of intangible asset financing arrangement (14.9 ) —
Repurchase of Conagra Brands, Inc. common shares (170.1 ) —
Cash dividends paid (219.4 ) (215.0 )
Exercise of stock options and issuance of other stock awards 47.4
119.2
Net cash flows from financing activities — continuing operations (920.0 ) (173.0 )
Net cash flows from financing activities — discontinued operations 839.1
6.2
Net cash flows from financing activities (80.9 ) (166.8 )
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents (3.5 ) (3.0 )
Net change in cash and cash equivalents 608.0
(54.7 )
Discontinued operations cash activity included above:
Add: Cash balance included in assets held for sale and discontinued operations at beginning of period 36.4
49.0
Less: Cash balance included in assets held for sale and discontinued operations at end of period —
56.4
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 798.1
134.1
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $ 1,442.5
$ 72.0



	Twenty-six weeks ended
	November 26, 2017			November 27, 2016
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	377.8		$	315.9
Income from discontinued operations	0.1			103.0
Income from continuing operations	377.7			212.9
Adjustments to reconcile income from continuing operations to net cash flows from operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization	129.0			133.5
Asset impairment charges	8.8			211.9
Gain on divestitures	—			(197.5		)
Loss on extinguishment of debt	—			60.6
Earnings of affiliates in excess of distributions	(50.6		)	(23.4		)
Stock-settled share-based payments expense	17.7			18.3
Contributions to pension plans	(6.1		)	(5.9		)
Pension benefit	(21.5		)	(20.6		)
Other items	3.8			23.9
Change in operating assets and liabilities excluding effects of business acquisitions and dispositions:
Receivables	(109.8		)	(49.2		)
Inventories	(130.5		)	(32.2		)
Deferred income taxes and income taxes payable, net	95.3			183.5
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	0.1			0.2
Accounts payable	132.3			71.7
Accrued payroll	(39.7		)	(95.5		)
Other accrued liabilities	(1.8		)	(31.6		)
Net cash flows from operating activities — continuing operations	404.7			460.6
Net cash flows from operating activities — discontinued operations	16.0			81.6
Net cash flows from operating activities	420.7			542.2
Cash flows from investing activities:
Additions to property, plant and equipment	(123.4		)	(118.3		)
Sale of property, plant and equipment	6.9			11.3
Proceeds from divestitures	—			489.1
Purchase of businesses	(249.6		)	(108.2		)
Net cash flows from investing activities — continuing operations	(366.1		)	273.9
Net cash flows from investing activities — discontinued operations	—			(123.7		)
Net cash flows from investing activities	(366.1		)	150.2
Cash flows from financing activities:
Net short-term borrowings	38.9			(7.2		)
Issuance of long-term debt, net of debt issuance costs	497.4			—
Repayment of long-term debt	(4.8		)	(555.8		)
Payment of intangible asset financing arrangement	(14.4		)	(14.9		)
Repurchase of Conagra Brands, Inc. common shares	(580.0		)	(170.1		)
Cash dividends paid	(171.6		)	(219.4		)
Exercise of stock options and issuance of other stock awards, including tax withholdings	4.0			47.4
Net cash flows from financing activities — continuing operations	(230.5		)	(920.0		)
Net cash flows from financing activities — discontinued operations	—			839.1
Net cash flows from financing activities	(230.5		)	(80.9		)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents	8.5			(3.5		)
Net change in cash and cash equivalents	(167.4		)	608.0
Add: Cash balance included in assets held for sale and discontinued operations at beginning of period	—			36.4
Less: Cash balance included in assets held for sale and discontinued operations at end of period	—			—
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	251.4			798.1
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	84.0		$	1,442.5

See ~~notes~~Notes to the ~~condensed consolidated financial statements.~~Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Conagra Brands, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

For the Twenty-six weeks ended November ~~27, 2016~~26, 2017 and November ~~29, 2015~~27, 2016

(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The unaudited financial information reflects all adjustments, which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of the results of operations, financial position, and cash flows for the periods presented. The adjustments are of a normal recurring nature, except as otherwise noted. These ~~condensed consolidated financial statements~~Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with the ~~consolidated financial statements~~Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes included in the Conagra Brands, Inc. (formerly ConAgra Foods, Inc., the "Company", "we", "us", or "our") Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May ~~29, 2016~~28, 2017.

The results of operations for any quarter or a partial fiscal year period are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for other periods or the full fiscal year.

Basis of Consolidation — The ~~condensed consolidated financial statements~~Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of Conagra Brands, Inc. and all majority-owned subsidiaries. In addition, the accounts of all variable interest entities for which we have been determined to be the primary beneficiary are included in our ~~condensed consolidated financial statements~~Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements from the date such determination is made. All significant intercompany investments, accounts, and transactions have been eliminated.

On November 9, 2016, the Company completed the ~~previously announced~~ spinoff of Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. (“("Lamb ~~Weston”~~Weston") through a distribution of 100% of the ~~Company’s~~Company's interest in Lamb Weston to holders of shares of the ~~Company’s~~Company's common stock ~~(the “Spinoff ”)~~ as of November 1, ~~2016.~~2016 (the "Spinoff"). In accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles ("U.S. GAAP"), the ~~financial position and~~ results of operations of the Lamb Weston operations are presented as discontinued operations and, as such, have been excluded from continuing operations and segment results for all periods presented (see Note 3 for additional discussion).

Comprehensive Income — Comprehensive income includes net income, currency translation adjustments, certain derivative-related activity, changes in the value of available-for-sale investments, and changes in prior service cost and net actuarial gains (losses) from pension (for amounts not in excess of the 10% corridor) and post-retirement health care plans. ~~We generally deem our~~On foreign investments we deem to be essentially permanent in nature, ~~and~~ we do not provide for taxes on currency translation adjustments arising from converting ~~the~~an investment denominated in a foreign currency to U.S. dollars. When we determine that a foreign investment, as well as undistributed earnings, are no longer permanent in nature, estimated taxes will be provided for the related deferred tax liability (asset), if any, resulting from currency translation adjustments.

The following table details the accumulated balances for each component of other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:



	November 26, 2017			May 28, 2017
Currency translation losses, net of reclassification adjustments	$	(78.7	)	$	(98.6	)
Derivative adjustments, net of reclassification adjustments	(0.4		)	(1.1		)
Unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities	0.1			(0.3		)
Pension and post-employment benefit obligations, net of reclassification adjustments	(86.2		)	(112.9		)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	$	(165.2	)	$	(212.9	)

The following table summarizes the reclassifications from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) into operations:


	Thirteen weeks ended						Affected Line Item in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations	Thirteen weeks ended						Affected Line Item in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Earnings¹
	November 27, 2016			November 29, 2015				November 26, 2017			November 27, 2016
Amortization of pension and postretirement liabilities:
Net derivative adjustment, net of tax:
Cash flow hedges								$	0.1		$	—		Interest expense, net
								0.1			—			Total before tax
								—			—			Income tax expense
								$	0.1		$	—		Net of tax
Pension and postretirement liabilities:
Net prior service benefit	$	(0.9	)	$	(1.3	)	Selling, general and administrative expenses	$	(0.2	)	$	(0.9	)	Selling, general and administrative expenses
	(0.9		)	(1.3		)	Total before tax	(0.2		)	(0.9		)	Total before tax
	0.4			0.5			Income tax expense	0.1			0.4			Income tax expense
	$	(0.5	)	$	(0.8	)	Net of tax	$	(0.1	)	$	(0.5	)	Net of tax


	Twenty-six weeks ended						Affected Line Item in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations	Twenty-six weeks ended						Affected Line Item in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Earnings¹
	November 27, 2016			November 29, 2015				November 26, 2017			November 27, 2016
Amortization of pension and postretirement liabilities:
Net derivative adjustment, net of tax:
Cash flow hedges								$	0.1		$	—		Interest expense, net
								0.1			—			Total before tax
								—			—			Income tax expense
								$	0.1		$	—		Net of tax
Pension and postretirement liabilities:
Net prior service benefit	$	(1.8	)	$	(2.6	)	Selling, general and administrative expenses	$	(0.3	)	$	(1.8	)	Selling, general and administrative expenses
	(1.8		)	(2.6		)	Total before tax	(0.3		)	(1.8		)	Total before tax
	0.7			1.0			Income tax expense	0.1			0.7			Income tax expense
	$	(1.1	)	$	(1.6	)	Net of tax	$	(0.2	)	$	(1.1	)	Net of tax

¹ Amounts in parentheses indicate income recognized in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Earnings.

Cash and cash equivalents — Cash and all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less at the date of acquisition, including short-term time deposits and government agency and corporate obligations, are classified as cash and cash equivalents.

As part of the consideration for the Spinoff, the Company received a cash payment from Lamb Weston in the amount of $823.5 million. In order to maintain the tax-free nature of the Spinoff, the Company must use the cash within twelve months of receiving the payment and may only use it in one or more of the following ways: to pay dividends on its common stock, to repay debt incurred prior to July 8, 2016, and to repurchase shares of its common stock. At November 27, 2016, we had approximately $753.4 million of the payment remaining.

Reclassifications and other changes — Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform with current year presentation.

Use of Estimates — Preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions affect reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses as reflected in the ~~condensed consolidated financial statements.~~Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

Accounting Changes — In ~~March 2016,~~July 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") ~~2016-09,~~2015-11, ~~Improvements~~Inventory, which requires an entity to ~~Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting,~~ ~~which simplifies~~measure inventory within the ~~accounting for income taxes, among other changes, related to stock-based compensation.~~scope at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Net realizable value is the estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal, and transportation. We ~~elected to early adopt~~adopted this ASU ~~as of the beginning of~~prospectively in fiscal 2017. Starting in the first quarter of fiscal 2017, we recognized all excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies as income tax expense or benefit as a discrete event. An income tax benefit of approximately $2.4 million and $14.0 million was recognized in the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2017, respectively, as a result of the2018. The adoption of ~~ASU 2016-09. The treatment of forfeitures has changed as we~~this guidance did not have ~~elected~~a material impact to ~~discontinue~~ our past process of estimating the number of forfeitures and now account for forfeitures as they occur. As such, this had a cumulative effect on retained earnings of $3.9 million, net of tax. We have elected to present the cash flow statement on a retrospective transition method and prior periods have been adjusted to present the excess tax benefits as part of cash flows from operating activities. This resulted in an increase in cash flows from operating activities and a decrease in cash flows from financing activities of $34.1 million in the first half of fiscal 2016.financial statements.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards — In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which requires an entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers. The ASU will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance in U.S. GAAP. On July 9, 2015, the FASB deferred the effective date of the new revenue recognition standard by one year. Based on the ~~FASB’s~~FASB's ASU, we will apply the new revenue standard in our fiscal year 2019. Early adoption in our fiscal year 2018 is permitted. We are in the process of documenting the impact of the guidance on our current accounting policies and practices in order to identify material differences, if any, that would result from applying the new requirements to our revenue contracts. We continue to make progress on our revenue recognition review and are also in the

process of evaluating the impact, if any, on changes to our business processes, systems, and controls to support recognition and disclosure requirements under the new guidance. We continue to evaluate the effect that ASU 2014-09 will have on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. The standard permits the use of either the retrospective or cumulative effect transition method.

~~In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-11,~~ ~~Inventory~~, which requires an entity to measure inventory within the scope at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Net realizable value is the estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal, and transportation. The effective date for the standard is for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is permitted. The standard is to be applied prospectively. We do not expect ASU 2015-11 to have a material impact to our consolidated financial statements.

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, Financial Instruments-Overall: Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, which addresses certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of financial instruments. The effective date for this standard is for fiscal years beginning after December 31, 2017. Early adoption is not permitted except for certain provisions. We do not expect ASU 2016-01 to have a material impact to our consolidated financial statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ~~its final lease accounting standard, FASB Accounting Standard Codification ("ASC") Topic 842,~~ASU 2016-02, Leases, Topic 842, which requires lessees to reflect most leases on their balance sheet as assets and obligations. The effective date for the standard is for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted. We are evaluating the effect that ~~ASC 842~~this standard will have on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. The standard is to be applied under the modified retrospective method, with elective reliefs, which requires application of the new guidance for all periods presented.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows: Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments, which clarifies how companies present and classify certain cash receipts and cash payments in the statement of cash flows. The effective date for the standard is for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted. We ~~are currently evaluating the~~do not expect ASU 2016-15 to have a material impact ~~of our pending adoption of this standard on~~to our consolidated financial statements.

In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows: Restricted Cash, which provides amendments to current guidance to address the classifications and presentation of changes in restricted cash in the statement of cash flows. The effective date for the standard is for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted. We do not expect ASU 2016-18 to have a material impact to our consolidated financial statements.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-01, Business Combinations: Clarifying the Definition of a Business, which provides a new framework for determining whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. The effective date for the standard is for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted. We do not expect ASU 2017-01 to have a material impact to our consolidated financial statements.

In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-07, Retirement Benefits: Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost, which requires companies to present the service cost component of net benefit cost in the same line items in which they report compensation cost. Companies will present all other components of net benefit cost outside operating income, if this subtotal is presented. The effective date for the standard is for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted. We do not expect ASU 2017-07 to have a material impact to our consolidated financial statements.

In August 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-12, Derivatives and Hedging: Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities, which improves the financial reporting of hedging relationships to better portray the economic results of an entity's risk management activities in its financial statements and make certain targeted improvements to simplify the application of the hedge accounting guidance in current U.S. GAAP. The amendments in this update better align an entity's risk management activities and financial reporting for hedging relationships through changes to both the designation and measurement guidance for qualifying hedging relationships and presentation of hedge results. The effective date for the standard is for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact of our pending adoption of this standard on our consolidated financial statements.

2. ACQUISITIONS

In October 2017, we acquired Angie's Artisan Treats, LLC, maker of Angie's^®BOOMCHICKAPOP^® ready-to-eat popcorn, for a cash purchase price of $249.6 million, net of cash acquired and subject to working capital adjustments. Approximately $156.5 million has been classified as goodwill, of which $95.4 million is deductible for income tax purposes. Approximately $73.8 million and $10.3 million of the purchase price has been allocated to non-amortizing and amortizing intangible assets, respectively. The business is included in the Grocery & Snacks segment.

In April 2017, we acquired protein-based snacking businesses Thanasi Foods LLC, maker of Duke's^® meat snacks, and BIGS LLC, maker of BIGS^® seeds, for $217.6 million in cash, net of cash acquired, including working capital adjustments. Approximately $133.3 million has been classified as goodwill, of which $70.9 million is deductible for income tax purposes. Approximately $65.1 million and $16.1 million of the purchase price has been allocated to non-amortizing and amortizing intangible assets, respectively. These businesses are included in the Grocery & Snacks segment.

We acquired the businesses for a cash purchase price of $108.2 million, ~~in cash,~~ net of cash acquired, ~~and subject to~~including working capital adjustments. Approximately ~~$38.4~~$39.5 million has been classified as goodwill and ~~$66.7~~$47.1 million and $19.6 million has been classified as ~~other~~non-amortizing and amortizing intangible assets, ~~pending determination of the final purchase price allocation.~~respectively. The amount allocated to goodwill is deductible for tax purposes. These businesses are ~~included in~~reflected principally within the Grocery & Snacks segment, and to a lesser extent within the Refrigerated & Frozen and International segments.

These acquisitions collectively contributed $37.4 million and $68.4 million to net sales during the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2018, respectively, and $6.4 million for each of the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2017.

For each of these acquisitions, the amounts allocated to goodwill were primarily attributable to anticipated synergies, product portfolios, and other intangibles that do not qualify for separate recognition.

Under the acquisition method of accounting, the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in these acquisitions were recorded at their respective estimated fair values at the date of acquisition.

Subsequent to the end of the second quarter of fiscal 2018, we entered into a definitive agreement to acquire the Sandwich Bros. of Wisconsin^® business, maker of frozen breakfast and entree flatbread pocket sandwiches, for a cash purchase price of $87 million, net of cash acquired and subject to working capital adjustments. The business will be primarily included in the Refrigerated & Frozen segment. The transaction is expected to close in early calendar year 2018, subject to customary closing conditions, including the receipt of any applicable regulatory approvals.

3. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS AND OTHER DIVESTITURES

Lamb Weston Spinoff

On November 9, 2016, ~~the Company~~we completed the ~~previously announced~~ Spinoff of ~~its~~our Lamb Weston business. As of such date, ~~the Company~~we did not beneficially own any equity interest in Lamb Weston and no longer ~~consolidates~~consolidated Lamb Weston into ~~its~~our financial results. The business results were previously reported in the Commercial segment. We reflected the results of this business as discontinued operations for all periods presented. The assets and liabilities of the Lamb Weston business have been reclassified as assets and liabilities of discontinued operations within our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets for the period presented prior to the Spinoff.

The summary comparative financial results of the Lamb Weston business through the date of the Spinoff, included within discontinued operations, were as follows:

Thirteen weeks ended Twenty-six weeks ended
November 27, 2016 November 29, 2015 November 27, 2016 November 29, 2015
Net sales $ 636.0
$ 735.2
$ 1,407.9
$ 1,477.1
Income from discontinued operations before income taxes and equity method investment earnings $ 46.3
$ 118.4
$ 175.1
$ 215.5
Income before income taxes and equity method investment earnings 46.3
118.4
175.1
215.5
Income tax expense 39.1
40.3
88.6
76.0
Equity method investment earnings 5.3
7.8
15.9
20.2
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax 12.5
85.9
102.4
159.7
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests 3.2
3.7
6.8
5.2
Net income from discontinued operations attributable to CAG $ 9.3
$ 82.2
$ 95.6
$ 154.5



	Thirteen weeks ended				Twenty-six weeks ended
	November 26, 2017		November 27, 2016		November 26, 2017			November 27, 2016
Net sales	$	—	$	636.0	$	—		$	1,407.9
Income (loss) from discontinued operations before income taxes and equity method investment earnings	$	—	$	46.3	$	(0.3	)	$	175.1
Income (loss) before income taxes and equity method investment earnings	—		46.3		(0.3		)	175.1
Income tax expense (benefit)	—		39.1		(0.1		)	88.6
Equity method investment earnings	—		5.3		—			15.9
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax	—		12.5		(0.2		)	102.4
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests	—		3.2		—			6.8
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations attributable to Conagra Brands, Inc.	$	—	$	9.3	$	(0.2	)	$	95.6

For the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2017, we incurred $62.2 million and $72.0 million, respectively, of expenses in connection with the Spinoff primarily related to professional fees and contract services associated with preparation of regulatory filings and separation activities. These expenses are reflected in income from discontinued operations.

~~The assets and liabilities classified as assets and liabilities of discontinued operations reflected in our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets related to the Lamb Weston business were as follows:~~

May 29, 2016
Cash and cash equivalents $ 36.4
Receivables, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $0.5 186.5
Inventories 498.9
Prepaid expenses and other current assets 57.9
Total current assets of discontinued operations $ 779.7
Property, plant and equipment, net $ 1,004.1
Goodwill 133.9
Brands, trademarks and other intangibles, net 39.6
Other assets 161.7
Total noncurrent assets of discontinued operations $ 1,339.3
Notes payable $ 24.9
Current installments of long-term debt 12.0
Accounts payable 238.7
Accrued payroll 50.3
Other accrued liabilities 83.3
Total current liabilities of discontinued operations $ 409.2
Senior long-term debt, excluding current installments $ 36.4
Other noncurrent liabilities 268.4
Total noncurrent liabilities of discontinued operations $ 304.8

In connection with the Spinoff, total assets of $2.28 billion ~~(net of cash assumed of $23.4 million)~~ and total liabilities of $2.98 billion (including debt of $2.46 billion) were transferred to Lamb Weston. As part of the consideration for the Spinoff, the Company received a cash payment from Lamb Weston in the amount of $823.5 million. See Note 5 for discussion of the debt-for-debt exchange related ~~debt-for-debt exchange.~~to the Spinoff.

We entered into a transition services agreement in connection with the Lamb Weston Spinoff and recognized $0.8 million and $2.1 million of income for the performance of services during the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2018, respectively, classified within selling, general and administrative ("SG&A") expenses.

Private Brands Operations

On February 1, 2016, pursuant to the Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of November 1, 2015, we completed the disposition of our Private Brands operations to TreeHouse Foods, Inc. for $2.6 billion in cash on a debt-free ~~basis, subject to working capital~~basis. Results of operations for the Private Brands business were immaterial for all periods presented.

We entered into a transition services agreement with TreeHouse Foods, Inc. and ~~other adjustments.~~

~~As a result~~recognized $0.5 million and $5.4 million of income for the ~~disposition, we recognized a pre-tax charge~~performance of ~~$86.3 million ($79.0 million after-tax) and $1.90 billion ($1.42 billion after-tax) in~~services during the second quarter of fiscal 2018 and 2017, respectively, classified within selling, general and administrative expenses. We recognized $2.2 million and $11.5 million of transition services agreement income in the first half of fiscal ~~2016, respectively,~~2018 and 2017, respectively.

Other Divestitures

During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017, we signed an agreement to ~~write-down~~sell our Wesson^® oil business, which is part of our Grocery & Snacks segment, to The J.M. Smucker Company ("Smucker"). The transaction is subject to certain customary closing conditions, including the ~~goodwill~~termination or expiration of the waiting period under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 (the "HSR Act"). On August 28, 2017, Smucker and ~~long-lived~~the Company each received a request for additional information under the HSR Act (a "second request") from the U.S. Federal Trade Commission ("FTC") in connection with the FTC's review of the transaction. The agreement for the sale of the Wesson^® oil business provides that, unless otherwise agreed upon by the Company and Smucker, if the closing of the transaction has not occurred on or prior to March 31, 2018 because HSR approval has not been received as of such date, then either party may terminate the agreement. The parties are cooperating fully with the FTC as it conducts its review of the transaction. The purchase price under the agreement is $285 million. The assets ~~to the estimated sales price, less costs to sell. We reflected the results~~ of this business have been reclassified as ~~discontinued operations~~assets held for sale within our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets for all periods presented.

The ~~summary comparative financial results of~~assets classified as held for sale reflected in our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets related to the ~~Private Brands~~Wesson^® oil business ~~included within discontinued operations,~~ were as follows:

Thirteen weeks ended Twenty-six weeks ended
November 27, 2016 November 29, 2015 November 27, 2016 November 29, 2015
Net sales $ (0.9 ) $ 958.9
$ (0.9 ) $ 1,850.7
Gain (loss) on sale of businesses $ (0.5 ) $ —
$ 1.0
$ —
Goodwill and long-lived asset impairment charges —
(86.3 ) —
(1,898.6 )
Income (loss) from operations of discontinued operations before income taxes and equity method investment earnings (0.6 ) 85.3
(1.3 ) 105.7
Loss before income taxes (1.1 ) (1.0 ) (0.3 ) (1,792.9 )
Income tax expense (benefit) (0.2 ) 5.7
(0.9 ) (466.4 )
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax $ (0.9 ) $ (6.7 ) $ 0.6
$ (1,326.5 )

~~Other Divestitures~~



	November 26, 2017		May 28, 2017
Current assets	$	45.8	$	35.5
Noncurrent assets (including goodwill of $74.5 million)	95.5		95.5

During the first quarter of fiscal 2017, we completed the sales of our Spicetec Flavors & Seasonings business ("Spicetec") and our JM Swank business, each of which was part of our Commercial ~~segment, for $327.0~~segment. Through the second quarter of fiscal 2017, we received $329.8 million and $159.3 million, respectively, in cash, net of cash included in the dispositions. We recognized pre-tax gains from the sales of $144.8 million and $52.9 million, ~~respectively. The assets and liabilities~~respectively, in the first half of fiscal 2017. We entered into transition services agreements in connection with the sales of these businesses ~~have been reclassified as assets~~ and ~~liabilities held for sale~~recognized $0.2 million of income during the first half of fiscal 2018 and $1.0 million during the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2017, classified within ~~our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets for the period presented prior to the divestiture.~~

~~The assets~~selling, general and ~~liabilities classified as held for sale reflected in our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets related to the Spicetec and JM Swank businesses were as follows:~~

May 29, 2016
Spicetec:
Current assets $ 43.3
Noncurrent assets (including goodwill of $104.7 million) 148.3
Current liabilities 10.3
Noncurrent liabilities 1.2
JM Swank:
Current assets $ 73.7
Noncurrent assets (including goodwill of $53.8 million) 74.3
Current liabilities 44.3
Noncurrent liabilities 0.4
administrative expenses.

In addition, we are actively marketing certain other long-lived assets. These assets have been reclassified as assets held for sale within our ~~condensed consolidated balance sheets~~Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets for all periods presented. The balance of these noncurrent assets classified as held for sale was ~~$1.7~~$5.0 million inand $11.6 million within our Corporate segment at November ~~27, 2016~~26, 2017 and ~~$6.8 million and $4.7 million in our Corporate and Grocery & Snacks segments at~~ May ~~29, 2016,~~28, 2017, respectively.

4. RESTRUCTURING ACTIVITIES

Supply Chain and Administrative Efficiency Plan

~~We previously~~In May 2013, we announced a plan for the integration and restructuring of the operations of Ralcorp Holdings, Inc. ("Ralcorp"), optimization of the entire Company's supply chain network, manufacturing assets, and dry distribution and mixing centers, and improvement of selling, general and administrative effectiveness and efficiencies, which we refer to as the Supply Chain and Administrative Efficiency Plan (the "SCAE Plan")~~. The SCAE Plan also includes plans announced in~~, our plan to integrate and restructure the operations of our Private Brands business, improve SG&A effectiveness and efficiencies, and optimize our supply chain network, manufacturing assets, dry distribution centers, and mixing centers. In the second quarter of fiscal 2016, we announced plans to realize efficiency benefits ~~through a combination of reductions in selling, general and administrative~~by reducing SG&A expenses and ~~enhancements to~~enhancing trade spend processes and ~~tools.~~tools, which plans were included as part of the SCAE Plan. Although ~~the divestiture of~~we divested the Private Brands business, ~~was completed in the third quarter of fiscal 2016, resulting in the sale of substantially all the Ralcorp operations,~~ we ~~will continue~~have continued to implement the SCAE Plan, including ~~work related~~by working to ~~optimizing~~optimize our supply chain network, ~~the pursuit of~~pursue cost reductions through our ~~selling, general and administrative~~SG&A functions, ~~enhancements to~~enhance trade spend processes and tools, and ~~productivity improvements.~~improve productivity.

Although we remain unable to make good faith estimates relating to the entire SCAE Plan, we are reporting on actions initiated through the end of the second quarter of fiscal ~~2017,~~2018, including the estimated amounts or range of amounts for each major type of costs expected to be incurred, and the charges that have resulted or will result in cash outflows. As of November ~~27, 2016,~~26, 2017, our Board of Directors has approved the incurrence of up to ~~$739.0~~$900.9 million of expenses in connection with the SCAE Plan, including expenses allocated for the Private Brands and Lamb Weston operations. We have incurred or expect to incur approximately ~~$432.8~~$464.8 million of charges ($~~292.4~~320.7 million of cash charges and ~~$140.4~~$144.1 million of non-cash charges) for actions identified to date under the SCAE Plan related to our continuing operations. In the second quarter and first half of fiscal ~~2017~~2018, we recognized charges of ~~$19.8~~$7.1 million and ~~$33.9~~$18.5 million, respectively, in ~~relation to~~association with the SCAE Plan related to our continuing operations. In the second quarter and first half of fiscal ~~2016~~2017, we recognized ~~charges of $133.0~~$19.8 million and ~~$150.4~~$33.9 million, respectively, in ~~relation to~~association with the SCAE Plan related to our continuing operations. We expect to incur costs related to the SCAE Plan over a multi-year period.

We anticipate that we will recognize the following pre-tax expenses in association with the SCAE Plan related to our continuing operations (amounts include charges recognized from plan inception through the first half of fiscal ~~2017)~~2018):


	Grocery & Snacks		Refrigerated & Frozen		International		Foodservice		Corporate		Total		Grocery & Snacks		Refrigerated & Frozen		International		Foodservice		Corporate		Total
Multi-employer pension costs	$	29.8	$	1.5	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	31.3
Pension costs													$	32.9	$	1.5	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	34.4
Accelerated depreciation	36.6		18.6		—		—		1.2		56.4		32.2		18.6		—		—		1.2		52.0
Other cost of goods sold	5.5		2.1		—		—		—		7.6		10.0		2.1		—		—		—		12.1
Total cost of goods sold	71.9		22.2		—		—		1.2		95.3		75.1		22.2		—		—		1.2		98.5
Severance and related costs, net	22.4		10.4		2.4		7.9		98.9		142.0		26.0		10.3		3.4		7.9		103.4		151.0
Fixed asset impairment (Net of gains on disposal)	6.9		8.2		—		—		4.4		19.5
Fixed asset impairment (net of gains on disposal)													5.9		6.9		—		—		11.2		24.0
Accelerated depreciation	—		—		—		—		1.8		1.8		—		—		—		—		4.7		4.7
Contract/Lease cancellation expenses	0.9		0.5		—		—		73.8		75.2
Consulting/Professional fees	0.6		0.4		0.1		—		52.0		53.1
Contract/lease cancellation expenses													0.9		0.6		0.6		—		86.2		88.3
Consulting/professional fees													1.1		0.4		0.1		—		54.1		55.7
Other selling, general and administrative expenses	11.6		3.5		—		—		30.8		45.9		16.1		3.2		—		—		23.3		42.6
Total selling, general and administrative expenses	42.4		23.0		2.5		7.9		261.7		337.5		50.0		21.4		4.1		7.9		282.9		366.3
Consolidated total	$	114.3	$	45.2	$	2.5	$	7.9	$	262.9	$	432.8	$	125.1	$	43.6	$	4.1	$	7.9	$	284.1	$	464.8

During the second quarter of fiscal ~~2017,~~2018, we recognized the following pre-tax expenses for the SCAE Plan related to our continuing operations:


	Grocery & Snacks			Refrigerated & Frozen			International		Foodservice		Corporate		Total			Grocery & Snacks			International		Corporate			Total
Accelerated depreciation	$	1.9		$	—		$	—	$	—	$	—	$	1.9
Pension costs																$	2.1		$	—	$	—		$	2.1
Other cost of goods sold	(0.1		)	—			—		—		—		(0.1		)	1.3			—		—			1.3
Total cost of goods sold	1.8			—			—		—		—		1.8			3.4			—		—			3.4
Severance and related costs, net	0.8			(0.2		)	0.3		—		2.1		3.0			(0.2		)	0.9		0.6			1.3
Fixed asset impairment (Net of gains on disposal)	(2.7		)	2.0			—		—		2.9		2.2
Fixed asset impairment (net of gains on disposal)																(1.5		)	—		—			(1.5		)
Accelerated depreciation	—			—			—		—		0.3		0.3			—			—		0.7			0.7
Contract/Lease cancellation expenses	—			—			0.1		—		8.9		9.0
Consulting/Professional fees	—			—			—		—		0.2		0.2
Contract/lease cancellation expenses																0.1			—		(0.1		)	—
Consulting/professional fees																0.1			—		0.4			0.5
Other selling, general and administrative expenses	1.5			0.4			—		—		1.4		3.3			2.1			—		0.6			2.7
Total selling, general and administrative expenses	(0.4		)	2.2			0.4		—		15.8		18.0			0.6			0.9		2.2			3.7
Consolidated total	$	1.4		$	2.2		$	0.4	$	—	$	15.8	$	19.8		$	4.0		$	0.9	$	2.2		$	7.1

Included in the above table are ~~$15.4~~$7.7 million of charges that have resulted or will result in cash outflows and ~~$4.4 million in~~net non-cash ~~charges.~~gains of $0.6 million.

During the first half of fiscal ~~2017,~~2018, we recognized the following pre-tax expenses for the SCAE Plan related to our continuing operations:


	Grocery & Snacks			Refrigerated & Frozen			International		Foodservice		Corporate		Total		Grocery & Snacks			International		Corporate			Total
Pension costs															$	2.1		$	—	$	—		$	2.1
Accelerated depreciation	$	3.7		$	1.2		$	—	$	—	$	—	$	4.9	1.2			—		—			1.2
Other cost of goods sold	1.9			0.2			—		—		—		2.1		2.4			—		—			2.4
Total cost of goods sold	5.6			1.4			—		—		—		7.0		5.7			—		—			5.7
Severance and related costs, net	0.6			(0.2		)	0.5		1.8		2.1		4.8		1.8			0.9		0.6			3.3
Fixed asset impairment (Net of gains on disposal)	(2.1		)	4.6			—		—		2.9		5.4
Fixed asset impairment (net of gains on disposal)															(1.4		)	—		4.4			3.0
Accelerated depreciation	—			—			—		—		0.5		0.5		—			—		1.3			1.3
Contract/Lease cancellation expenses	—			—			0.1		—		7.4		7.5
Consulting/Professional fees	—			—			—		—		0.3		0.3
Contract/lease cancellation expenses															0.1			—		(0.1		)	—
Consulting/professional fees															0.1			—		0.6			0.7
Other selling, general and administrative expenses	2.2			1.4			—		—		4.8		8.4		3.9			—		0.6			4.5
Total selling, general and administrative expenses	0.7			5.8			0.6		1.8		18.0		26.9		4.5			0.9		7.4			12.8
Consolidated total	$	6.3		$	7.2		$	0.6	$	1.8	$	18.0	$	33.9	$	10.2		$	0.9	$	7.4		$	18.5

Included in the above table are ~~$20.9~~$12.5 million of charges that have resulted or will result in cash outflows and ~~$13.0~~$6.0 million in non-cash charges.

We recognized the following cumulative (plan inception to November ~~27, 2016)~~26, 2017) pre-tax expenses related to the SCAE Plan related to our continuing operations in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of ~~Operations:~~Earnings:


	Grocery & Snacks		Refrigerated & Frozen		International		Foodservice		Corporate		Total		Grocery & Snacks		Refrigerated & Frozen		International		Foodservice		Corporate		Total
Multi-employer pension costs	$	29.8	$	1.5	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	31.3
Pension costs													$	35.0	$	1.5	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	36.5
Accelerated depreciation	25.1		18.6		—		—		1.2		44.9		32.2		18.6		—		—		1.2		52.0
Other cost of goods sold	3.8		2.1		—		—		—		5.9		7.4		2.1		—		—		—		9.5
Total cost of goods sold	58.7		22.2		—		—		1.2		82.1		74.6		22.2		—		—		1.2		98.0
Severance and related costs, net	21.2		10.3		2.7		7.9		98.5		140.6		25.7		10.3		3.4		7.9		102.1		149.4
Fixed asset impairment (Net of gains on disposal)	5.1		8.2		—		—		3.7		17.0
Fixed asset impairment (net of gains on disposal)													5.9		6.9		—		—		11.2		24.0
Accelerated depreciation	—		—		—		—		1.8		1.8		—		—		—		—		3.9		3.9
Contract/Lease cancellation expenses	0.8		0.5		0.1		—		69.1		70.5
Consulting/Professional fees	0.6		0.4		0.1		—		51.1		52.2
Contract/lease cancellation expenses													0.9		0.6		0.6		—		71.2		73.3
Consulting/professional fees													1.0		0.4		0.1		—		51.8		53.3
Other selling, general and administrative expenses	7.6		3.0		—		—		17.8		28.4		15.1		3.2		—		—		20.6		38.9
Total selling, general and administrative expenses	35.3		22.4		2.9		7.9		242.0		310.5		48.6		21.4		4.1		7.9		260.8		342.8
Consolidated total	$	94.0	$	44.6	$	2.9	$	7.9	$	243.2	$	392.6	$	123.2	$	43.6	$	4.1	$	7.9	$	262.0	$	440.8

Included in the above ~~table~~results are ~~$267.6~~$298.0 million of charges that have resulted or will result in cash outflows and ~~$125.0~~$142.8 million in non-cash charges. Not included in the above ~~table~~results are $130.2 million of pre-tax expenses ($84.5 million of cash charges and $45.7 million of non-cash charges) related to the Private Brands operations, which we sold in the third quarter of fiscal 2016, and $2.1 million of pre-tax expenses (all resulting in cash charges) related to Lamb Weston.

Liabilities recorded for the SCAE Plan related to our continuing operations and changes therein for the first half of fiscal ~~2017~~2018 were as follows:

Balance at May 29,
2016
Costs Incurred
and Charged
to Expense

Costs Paid
or Otherwise Settled
Changes in Estimates Balance at November 27,
2016
Multi-employer pension costs $ 40.7
$ —
$ (10.9 ) $ —
$ 29.8
Severance 47.2
6.5
(31.3 ) (1.7 ) 20.7
Consulting 4.7
0.3
(4.6 ) —
0.4
Contract termination 6.3
11.4
(2.2 ) (1.3 ) 14.2
Other costs 0.5
8.5
(7.9 ) —
1.1
Total $ 99.4
$ 26.7
$ (56.9 ) $ (3.0 ) $ 66.2



	Balance at May 28, 2017		Costs Incurred and Charged to Expense		Costs Paid or Otherwise Settled			Changes in Estimates			Balance at November 26, 2017
Pension costs	$	31.8	$	—	$	—		$	2.1		$	33.9
Severance and related costs	13.8		4.0		(7.9		)	(0.7		)	9.2
Consulting/professional fees	0.6		0.7		(1.1		)	—			0.2
Contract/lease cancellation	11.6		0.3		(3.6		)	(0.3		)	8.0
Other costs	1.9		6.5		(6.9		)	—			1.5
Total	$	59.7	$	11.5	$	(19.5	)	$	1.1		$	52.8

5. LONG-TERM DEBT AND REVOLVING CREDIT FACILITY

At November 26, 2017, we had a revolving credit facility (the "Facility") with a syndicate of financial institutions that provides for a maximum aggregate principal amount outstanding at any one time of $1.25 billion (subject to increase to a maximum aggregate principal amount of $1.75 billion with the consent of the lenders). As of November ~~27, 2016,~~26, 2017, we were in compliance with all financial covenants ~~with~~under the Facility.

During the second quarter of fiscal 2018, we issued $500.0 million aggregate principal amount of floating rate notes due October 9, 2020. The notes bear interest at a rate equal to three-month LIBOR plus 0.50% per annum.

During the third quarter of fiscal 2017, we repaid the remaining principal balance of $224.8 million of our ~~revolving credit facility.~~5.819% senior notes due 2017 and $248.2 million principal amount of our 7.0% senior notes due 2019, in each case prior to maturity, resulting in a net loss on early retirement of debt of $32.7 million.

In connection with the Spinoff (see Note 3), Lamb Weston issued to us $1.54 billion aggregate principal amount of senior notes (the ~~“Lamb~~"Lamb Weston ~~notes”~~notes"). On November 9, 2016, we exchanged the Lamb Weston notes for $250.2 million aggregate principal amount of our 5.819% senior notes due 2017, $880.4 million aggregate principal amount of our 1.9% senior notes due 2018, $154.9 million aggregate principal amount of our 2.1% senior notes due 2018, $86.9 million aggregate principal amount of our 7.0% senior notes due 2019, and $71.1 million aggregate principal amount of our 4.95% senior notes due 2020 ~~(the “Conagra notes”~~(collectively, the "Conagra notes"), which had been purchased in the open market by certain investment banks prior to the Spinoff. Following the exchange, we ~~cancelled~~canceled the Conagra notes. These actions resulted in a net loss of $60.6 million as a cost of early retirement of debt.

~~During the first quarter of fiscal 2017, we repaid the entire principal balance of $550.0 million of our floating rate notes on the maturity date of July 21, 2016.~~

~~During the second quarter of fiscal 2016, we repaid the entire principal balance of $250.0 million of our 1.35% senior notes on the maturity date of September 10, 2015.~~

Net interest expense from continuing operations consists of:


	Thirteen weeks ended						Twenty-six weeks ended						Thirteen weeks ended						Twenty-six weeks ended
	November 27, 2016			November 29, 2015			November 27, 2016			November 29, 2015			November 26, 2017			November 27, 2016			November 26, 2017			November 27, 2016
Long-term debt	$	56.6		$	80.2		$	117.5		$	162.2		$	39.4		$	56.6		$	77.5		$	117.5
Short-term debt	0.2			0.6			0.4			0.8			0.7			0.2			1.1			0.4
Interest income	(0.8		)	—			(1.5		)	(0.1		)	(1.1		)	(0.8		)	(2.0		)	(1.5		)
Interest capitalized	(1.9		)	(1.6		)	(4.1		)	(3.6		)	(1.0		)	(1.9		)	(2.2		)	(4.1		)
	$	54.1		$	79.2		$	112.3		$	159.3		$	38.0		$	54.1		$	74.4		$	112.3

6. VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES

Variable Interest Entities Not Consolidated

We have variable interests in certain ~~other~~ entities that we have determined to be variable interest entities, but for which we are not the primary beneficiary. We do not consolidate the financial statements of these entities.

We lease certain office buildings from entities that we have determined to be variable interest entities. The lease agreements with these entities include fixed-price purchase options for the assets being leased. The lease agreements also contain contingent put options (the ~~“lease~~"lease put ~~options”~~options") that allow the lessors to require us to purchase the buildings at the greater of original construction cost, or fair market value, without a lease agreement in place (the ~~“put price”~~"put price") in certain limited circumstances. As a result of substantial impairment

related properties was ~~$58.5~~$50.7 million, of which we had accrued $10.2 million and $8.4 million, respectively. In December 2017, subsequent to the second quarter of fiscal 2018, we purchased a building that had been subject to a put option. We will recognize a net loss of approximately $13 million for the early termination of the associated lease in our third quarter of fiscal 2018. Also in December 2017, we made an offer to purchase another property subject to a put option. We have ~~accrued $12.9 million. As these buildings are worth considerably more when under lease agreements than when vacant,~~not entered into a binding legal contract in connection with this offer. However, if our offer is accepted, we may ~~be able~~recognize an estimated loss of $30 million to ~~mitigate some, or all,~~$40 million, upon closing of the ~~financial exposure created by~~transaction, for the early exit of an unfavorable lease contract. If this transaction is completed, we would have one remaining leased building subject to a put option for which the put ~~options~~option price exceeds the estimated fair value by ~~maintaining active lease agreements and/or by subleasing~~$8.2 million, of which we had accrued $1.0 million, as of November 26, 2017. These leases, with the ~~buildings to credit worthy tenants. We do not expect to ultimately incur material financial losses as a result~~exception of ~~the potential exercise of the lease put options by the lessors. These leases~~one, are accounted for as operating ~~leases,~~leases. A capital lease asset and ~~accordingly, there are no material assets or liabilities, other than the accrued portion~~related lease obligation of ~~the put price, associated with these entities~~$25.3 million and $28.9 million, respectively, were included in ~~our condensed consolidated balance sheets.~~the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of November 26, 2017. We have determined that we do not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of these entities. In making this determination, we have considered, among other items, the terms of the lease agreements, the expected remaining useful lives of the assets leased, and the capital structure of the lessor entities.

7. GOODWILL AND OTHER IDENTIFIABLE INTANGIBLE ASSETS

The change in the carrying amount of goodwill for the first half of fiscal ~~2017~~2018 was as follows:

Grocery & Snacks Refrigerated & Frozen International Foodservice Total
Balance as of May 29, 2016 $ 2,337.4
$ 1,028.9
$ 448.6
$ 581.3
$ 4,396.2
Impairment —
—
(183.1 ) —
(183.1 )
Acquisitions 38.4
—
38.4
Currency translation —
(0.6 ) (2.2 ) —
(2.8 )
Balance as of November 27, 2016 $ 2,375.8
$ 1,028.3
$ 263.3
$ 581.3
$ 4,248.7



	Grocery & Snacks			Refrigerated & Frozen		International		Foodservice		Total
Balance as of May 28, 2017	$	2,439.1		$	1,037.3	$	253.6	$	571.1	$	4,301.1
Acquisitions	156.5			—		—		—		156.5
Purchase accounting adjustments	(1.5		)	—		—		—		(1.5		)
Currency translation	—			0.9		—		—		0.9
Balance as of November 26, 2017	$	2,594.1		$	1,038.2	$	253.6	$	571.1	$	4,457.0

Other identifiable intangible assets were as follows:


	November 27, 2016				May 29, 2016				November 26, 2017				May 28, 2017
	Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization		Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization		Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization		Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization
Non-amortizing intangible assets	$	861.6	$	—	$	839.2	$	—	$	908.8	$	—	$	834.1	$	—
Amortizing intangible assets	563.1		163.8		543.9		145.9		587.3		197.9		575.4		180.2
	$	1,424.7	$	163.8	$	1,383.1	$	145.9	$	1,496.1	$	197.9	$	1,409.5	$	180.2

In the ~~second~~first quarter ~~and first half~~ of fiscal 2017, in anticipation of the Spinoff, we ~~recognized~~changed our reporting segments. In accordance with applicable accounting guidance, we were required to determine new reporting units at a lower level (at the operating segment or one level lower, as applicable). When such a determination was made, we were required to perform a goodwill impairment ~~charges~~analysis for each of the new reporting units.

We performed an assessment of impairment of goodwill for the new Canadian reporting unit within the new International reporting segment. Estimating the fair value of individual reporting units requires us to make assumptions and estimates regarding our future plans and future industry and economic conditions. We estimated the future cash flows of the Canadian reporting unit and calculated the net present value of those estimated cash flows using a risk adjusted discount rate, in order to estimate the fair value of each reporting unit from the perspective of a market participant. We used discount rates and terminal growth rates of 7.5% and 2%, respectively, to calculate the present value of estimated future cash flows. We then compared the estimated fair value of the reporting unit to the historical carrying value (including allocated assets and liabilities of certain shared and Corporate functions), and determined that the fair value of the reporting unit was less than the carrying value in the ~~International segment~~first quarter of ~~$43.9 million~~fiscal 2017. With the assistance of a third-party valuation specialist, we estimated the fair value of the assets and ~~$183.1 million, respectively. Also~~liabilities of this reporting unit in order to determine the implied fair value of goodwill. We recognized an impairment charge for the difference between the implied fair value of goodwill and the carrying value of goodwill. Accordingly, during the first quarter of fiscal 2017, we recorded charges totaling $139.2 million for the impairment of goodwill.

accordance with applicable accounting guidance, we recognized an impairment ~~of a non-amortizing intangible asset~~charge of $24.4 million to write-down the intangible asset to its estimated fair value.

We also performed an assessment of impairment of goodwill for the new Mexican reporting unit within the International reporting segment using similar methods to those described above. We used discount rates and terminal growth rates of 8.5% and 3%, respectively, to calculate the present value of estimated future cash flows. We determined that the estimated fair value of this reporting unit exceeded the carrying value of its net assets by approximately 5%. Accordingly, we did not recognize an impairment of the goodwill in the ~~International segment. See~~Mexican reporting unit.

During the second quarter of fiscal 2017, as a result of further ~~discussion~~deterioration in ~~"Critical Accounting Estimates"~~forecasted sales and profits primarily due to foreign exchange rates, we performed an additional assessment of impairment of goodwill for the new Mexican reporting unit. We used discount rates and terminal growth rates of 8.5% and 3%, respectively, to calculate the present value of estimated future cash flows. We then compared the estimated fair value of the reporting unit to the historical carrying value (including allocated assets and liabilities of certain shared and Corporate functions), and determined that the fair value of the reporting unit was less than the carrying value in ~~Management's Discussion~~the second quarter of fiscal 2017. With the assistance of a third-party valuation specialist, we estimated the fair value of the assets and ~~Analysis.~~liabilities of this reporting unit in order to determine the implied fair value of goodwill. We recognized an impairment charge for the difference between the implied fair value of goodwill and the carrying value of goodwill. Accordingly, during the second quarter of fiscal 2017, we recorded charges totaling $43.9 million for the impairment of goodwill.

Non-amortizing intangible assets are comprised of brands and trademarks.

Amortizing intangible assets, carrying a remaining weighted average life of approximately 1514 years,, are principally composed of customer relationships, licensing arrangements, and acquired intellectual property. Amortization expense was $8.7 million and $17.3 million for the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2018, respectively, and $8.1 million and $16.5 million for the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2017, respectively. Based on amortizing assets recognized in our Condensed ~~consolidated balance sheet~~Consolidated Balance Sheet as of November ~~27, 2016~~26, 2017, amortization expense is estimated to average ~~$35.0~~$34.0 million for each of the next five years.

In the first quarter of fiscal 2016, we recorded an amortizing intangible asset of $92.8 million, of which only $14.9 million and $10.4 million were cash payments made in the first quarter of fiscal 2017 and fiscal 2016, respectively. Remaining payments will be made over a five-year period.

8. DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

Our operations are exposed to market risks from adverse changes in commodity prices affecting the cost of raw materials and energy, foreign currency exchange rates, and interest rates. In the normal course of business, these risks are managed through a variety of strategies, including the use of derivatives.

Commodity and commodity index futures and option contracts are used from time to time to economically hedge commodity input prices on items such as natural gas, vegetable oils, proteins, packaging materials, dairy, grains, and electricity. Generally, we economically hedge a portion of our anticipated consumption of commodity inputs for periods of up to 36 months. We may enter into longer-term

economic hedges on particular commodities, if deemed appropriate. As of November ~~27, 2016~~26, 2017, we had economically hedged certain portions of our anticipated consumption of commodity inputs using derivative instruments with expiration dates through ~~May 2017.~~December 2018.

In order to reduce exposures related to changes in foreign currency exchange rates, we enter into forward exchange, option, or swap contracts from time to time for transactions denominated in a currency other than the applicable functional currency. This includes, but is not limited to, hedging against foreign currency risk in purchasing inventory and capital equipment, sales of finished goods, and future settlement of foreign-denominated assets and liabilities. As of November ~~27, 2016~~26, 2017, we had economically hedged certain portions of our foreign currency risk in anticipated transactions using derivative instruments with expiration dates through ~~May 2017.~~August 2018.

From time to time, we may use derivative instruments, including interest rate swaps, to reduce risk related to changes in interest rates. This includes, but is not limited to, hedging against increasing interest rates prior to the issuance of long-term debt and hedging the fair value of our senior long-term debt.

Economic Hedges of Forecasted Cash Flows

Many of our derivatives do not qualify for, and we do not currently designate certain commodity or foreign currency derivatives to achieve, hedge accounting treatment. We reflect realized and unrealized gains and losses from derivatives used to economically hedge anticipated commodity consumption and to mitigate foreign currency cash flow risk in earnings immediately within general corporate expense (within cost of goods sold). The gains and losses are reclassified to segment operating results in the period in which the underlying item being economically hedged is recognized in cost of goods sold. In the event that management determines a particular derivative entered into as an economic hedge of a forecasted commodity purchase has ceased to function as an economic hedge, we cease recognizing further gains and losses on such derivatives in corporate expense and begin recognizing such gains and losses within segment operating results, immediately.

Economic Hedges of Fair Values — Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk

We may use options and cross currency swaps to economically hedge the fair value of certain monetary assets and liabilities (including intercompany balances) denominated in a currency other than the functional currency. These derivatives are marked-to-market with gains and losses immediately recognized in selling, general and administrative expenses. These substantially offset the foreign currency transaction gains or losses recognized as values of the monetary assets or liabilities being economically hedged change.

All derivative instruments are recognized on our balance sheets at fair value (refer to Note 16 for additional information related to fair value measurements). The fair value of derivative assets is recognized within prepaid expenses and other current assets, while the fair value of derivative liabilities is recognized within other accrued liabilities. In accordance with U.S. GAAP, we offset certain derivative asset and liability balances, as well as certain amounts representing rights to reclaim cash collateral and obligations to return cash collateral, where master netting agreements provide for legal right of setoff. At November ~~27, 2016~~26, 2017 and May ~~29, 2016, amounts~~28, 2017, $0.9 million representing a right to reclaim cash collateral ~~of $0.5 million and $0.3 million, respectively, were~~was included in prepaid expenses and other current assets in our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Derivative assets and liabilities and amounts representing a right to reclaim cash collateral or an obligation to return cash collateral were reflected in our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as follows:


	November 27, 2016		May 29, 2016		November 26, 2017		May 28, 2017
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	$	26.0	$	24.1	$	4.2	$	2.3
Other accrued liabilities	0.7		0.6		2.0		1.3

The following table presents our derivative assets and liabilities, at November ~~27, 2016,~~26, 2017, on a gross basis, prior to the setoff of ~~$1.2~~$0.1 million to total derivative assets and ~~$0.7~~$1.0 million to total derivative liabilities where legal right of setoff existed:


	Derivative Assets			Derivative Liabilities			Derivative Assets			Derivative Liabilities
	Balance Sheet Location	Fair Value		Balance Sheet Location	Fair Value		Balance Sheet Location	Fair Value		Balance Sheet Location	Fair Value
Commodity contracts	Prepaid expenses and other current assets	$	4.0	Other accrued liabilities	$	0.7	Prepaid expenses and other current assets	$	3.5	Other accrued liabilities	$	1.0
Foreign exchange contracts	Prepaid expenses and other current assets	23.2		Other accrued liabilities	0.3		Prepaid expenses and other current assets	0.8		Other accrued liabilities	1.9
Other	Prepaid expenses and other current assets	—		Other accrued liabilities	0.4		Prepaid expenses and other current assets	—		Other accrued liabilities	0.1
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments		$	27.2		$	1.4		$	4.3		$	3.0

The following table presents our derivative assets and liabilities at May ~~29, 2016~~28, 2017, on a gross basis, prior to the setoff of $~~1.7~~0.5 million to total derivative assets and $~~2.0~~1.4 million to total derivative liabilities where legal right of setoff existed:


	Derivative Assets			Derivative Liabilities			Derivative Assets			Derivative Liabilities
	Balance Sheet Location	Fair Value		Balance Sheet Location	Fair Value		Balance Sheet Location	Fair Value		Balance Sheet Location	Fair Value
Commodity contracts	Prepaid expenses and other current assets	$	5.0	Other accrued liabilities	$	2.1	Prepaid expenses and other current assets	$	2.6	Other accrued liabilities	$	1.4
Foreign exchange contracts	Prepaid expenses and other current assets	20.8		Other accrued liabilities	0.2		Prepaid expenses and other current assets	0.2		Other accrued liabilities	1.1
Other	Prepaid expenses and other current assets	—		Other accrued liabilities	0.3		Prepaid expenses and other current assets	—		Other accrued liabilities	0.2
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments		$	25.8		$	2.6		$	2.8		$	2.7

The location and amount of ~~gain (loss)~~gains (losses) from derivatives not designated as hedging instruments in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of ~~Operations~~Earnings were as follows:

Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments
Location in Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations of
Gain (Loss) Recognized on Derivatives

Amount of Gain (Loss)
Recognized on Derivatives
in Condensed Consolidated
Statement of Operations for
the Thirteen Weeks Ended
November 27, 2016 November 29, 2015
Commodity contracts Cost of goods sold $ 1.6
$ (3.8 )
Foreign exchange contracts Cost of goods sold 1.4
—
Foreign exchange contracts Selling, general and administrative expense 2.5
0.3
Total gain (loss) from derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments $ 5.5
$ (3.5 )


Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments	Location in Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations of Gain (Loss) Recognized on Derivatives	Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized on Derivatives in Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations for the Twenty-six Weeks Ended					Location in Condensed Consolidated Statement of Earnings of Gains Recognized on Derivatives	Gains Recognized on Derivatives in Condensed Consolidated Statement of Earnings for the Thirteen Weeks Ended
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments		November 27, 2016		November 29, 2015				November 26, 2017		November 27, 2016
Commodity contracts	Cost of goods sold	$	1.2	$	(9.7	)	Cost of goods sold	$	0.8	$	1.6
Foreign exchange contracts	Cost of goods sold	1.5		—			Cost of goods sold	2.2		1.4
Foreign exchange contracts	Selling, general and administrative expense	1.3		4.7			Selling, general and administrative expense	—		2.5
Total gain (loss) from derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments		$	4.0	$	(5.0	)
Total gains from derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments								$	3.0	$	5.5



Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments	Location in Condensed Consolidated Statement of Earnings of Gains (Losses) Recognized on Derivatives	Gains (Losses) Recognized on Derivatives in Condensed Consolidated Statement of Earnings for the Twenty-six Weeks Ended
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments		November 26, 2017			November 27, 2016
Commodity contracts	Cost of goods sold	$	1.4		$	1.2
Foreign exchange contracts	Cost of goods sold	(5.8		)	1.5
Foreign exchange contracts	Selling, general and administrative expense	0.3			1.3
Total gains (losses) from derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments		$	(4.1	)	$	4.0

As of November ~~27, 2016,~~26, 2017, our open commodity contracts had a notional value (defined as notional quantity times market value per notional quantity unit) of ~~$62.0~~$81.6 million and ~~$19.0~~$34.2 million for purchase and sales contracts, respectively. As of May ~~29, 2016,~~28, 2017, our open

commodity contracts had a notional value of ~~$74.7~~$76.8 million and ~~$41.5~~$73.4 million for purchase and sales contracts, respectively. The notional amount of our foreign currency forward ~~and cross currency swap~~ contracts as of November ~~27, 2016~~26, 2017 and May ~~29, 2016~~28, 2017 was ~~$112.4~~$72.8 million and ~~$112.9~~$81.9 million, respectively.

We enter into certain commodity, interest rate, and foreign exchange derivatives with a diversified group of counterparties. We continually monitor our positions and the credit ratings of the counterparties involved and limit the amount of credit exposure to any one party. These transactions may expose us to potential losses due to the risk of nonperformance by these counterparties. We have not incurred a material loss due to nonperformance in any period presented and do not expect to incur any such material loss. We also enter into futures and options transactions through various regulated exchanges.

At November ~~27, 2016~~26, 2017, the maximum amount of loss due to the credit risk of the counterparties, had the counterparties failed to perform according to the terms of the contracts, was ~~$23.4~~$0.9 million.

9. SHARE-BASED PAYMENTS

For the second quarter and first half of fiscal ~~2017,~~2018, we recognized total stock-based compensation expense (including stock options, restricted stock units, cash-settled restricted stock units, and performance shares) of ~~$17.9~~$12.3 million and ~~$32.7~~$18.7 million, respectively. For the second quarter and first half of fiscal ~~2016,~~2017, we recognized total stock-based compensation expense of ~~$15.0~~$17.9 million and ~~$37.4~~$32.7 million, respectively. These amounts are inclusive of discontinued operations. Included in the total stock-based compensation expense for the second quarter and first half of fiscal ~~2017~~2018 was ~~$0.3~~expense of $0.1 million and ~~$0.2~~$0.4 million, respectively, related to stock options granted by a subsidiary in the subsidiary's shares to the subsidiary's employees. The expense for these stock options ~~was $0.2 million~~ for the second quarter and first half of fiscal ~~2016.~~2017 was $0.3 million and $0.2 million, respectively. For the first half of fiscal ~~2017,~~2018, we granted ~~0.5~~0.8 million restricted stock units at a weighted average grant date price of ~~$47.56, 0.4 million cash-settled restricted stock units at a weighted average grant date price of $48.07, 1.1 million stock options at a weighted average exercise price of $48.01,~~$34.09 and ~~0.2~~0.5 million performance shares at a weighted average grant date price of ~~$46.94.~~$33.82.

Performance shares are granted to selected executives and other key employees with vesting contingent upon meeting various Company-wide performance goals. The performance goals for the performance period that began in fiscal 2015 and ends in fiscal 2017 were originally based upon an overarching earnings per share goal (for certain participants) and, for all participants, (a) our earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization ("EBITDA") return on capital, and (b) revenue growth, each measured over the defined performance period, and including the expected results of Lamb Weston. In connection with the Spinoff, the Human Resources Committee of the Board of Directors certified the EBITDA return on capital performance of the Company through the fiscal period that ended immediately prior to the Spinoff. Awards to participants originally subject to the overarching earnings per share goal remain subject to achievement of such goal. All other performance shares granted for the fiscal 2015 through 2017 performance period are subject only to continuing employment of the participant through the date of payout.

~~The performance~~ goal for one-third of the target number of performance shares for the three-year performance period ending in fiscal 2018 (the "2018 performance period") is based ~~upon an overarching earnings per share goal (for certain participants) and, for all participants,~~on our fiscal 2016 ~~EBITDA~~earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization ("EBITDA") return on capital. Another one-third of the target number of performance shares granted for the 2018 performance period is based on ~~an overarching earnings per share goal (for certain participants) and~~ our fiscal 2017 EBITDA return on capital. The fiscal 2017 EBITDA return on capital target,

when set, excluded the results of Lamb Weston. The performance goal for the last one-third of the target number of performance shares granted for the 2018 performance period is ~~expected~~based on our fiscal 2018 diluted earnings per share ("EPS") compound annual growth rate ("CAGR"). In addition, for certain participants, all performance shares for the 2018 performance period are subject to an overarching EPS goal that must be ~~set at~~met in each fiscal year of the ~~start of fiscal 2018.~~2018 performance period before any pay out can be made to such participants on the performance shares.

The performance goal for one-third of the target number of performance shares for the three-year performance period ending in fiscal 2019 (the "2019 performance period") is based ~~upon an overarching earnings per share goal (for certain participants) and~~on our fiscal 2017 EBITDA return on capital. The fiscal 2017 EBITDA return on capital target, when set, excluded the results of Lamb Weston. The performance goal for the final two-thirds of the target number of performance shares granted for the 2019 performance period is ~~expected~~based on our diluted EPS CAGR, measured over the two-year period ending in fiscal 2019. In addition, for certain participants, all performance shares for the 2019 performance period are subject to an overarching EPS goal that must be ~~set at~~met in each fiscal year of the ~~start~~2019 performance period before any pay out can be made to such participants on the performance shares.

The performance goal for the three-year performance period ending in fiscal 2020 is based on our diluted EPS CAGR, measured over the defined performance period. In addition, for certain participants, all performance shares for the 2020 performance period are subject to an overarching EPS goal that must be met in each fiscal year of ~~fiscal 2018.~~the 2020 performance period before any pay out can be made to such participants on the performance shares.

Awards, if earned, will be paid in shares of our common stock. Subject to limited exceptions set forth in the performance share plan, any shares earned will be distributed after the end of the performance period, and only if the participant continues to be employed with the Company through the date of distribution. ~~The~~For awards where performance against the performance target has not been certified, the value of the performance shares is adjusted based upon the market price of our common stock and current forecasted performance against the performance targets at the end of each reporting period and amortized as compensation expense over the vesting period.

In connection with the completion of the Spinoff, the provisions of our existing stock-based compensation arrangements required adjustments to the number and terms of outstanding stock options, restricted stock units, cash-settled restricted stock units, performance shares, and other share-based awards to preserve the intrinsic value of the awards immediately before and after the separation. The outstanding awards continue to vest over the original vesting periods (typically three years). Outstanding awards at the time of the Spinoff were converted into awards of the holder’s employer following separation. The stock awards held as of November 9, 2016 were adjusted as follows:

The number of shares of common stock subject to each outstanding stock option was increased and the corresponding exercise price was decreased to maintain the intrinsic value of each outstanding stock option immediately before and after the Spinoff. A comparison of the fair value of the outstanding stock option awards immediately before and after the Spinoff resulted in no incremental expense.

The number of shares of common stock underlying each outstanding restricted stock unit and performance share, and the value of each outstanding cash-settled restricted stock was increased to preserve the intrinsic value of such award immediately prior to the Spinoff. The Company did not record any incremental compensation expense related to the adjustment of these awards.

As of November 27, 2016, after adjustments related to the Spinoff, the Company had total outstanding stock options of 7.6 million with a weighted average exercise price of $26.89 per share, nonvested restricted stock units of 1.7 million, and nonvested performance shares of 0.9 million at target.

~~The weighted average Black-Scholes assumptions for stock options granted during the first half of fiscal 2017 were as follows:~~



~~Expected volatility (%)~~	~~19.15~~
~~Dividend yield (%)~~	~~2.33~~
~~Risk-free interest rate (%)~~	~~1.03~~
~~Expected life of stock option (years)~~	~~4.94~~

~~The weighted average value of stock options granted during the first half of fiscal 2017 was $6.12 per option based upon a Black-Scholes methodology.~~

10. EARNINGS ~~(LOSS)~~ PER SHARE

Basic earnings ~~(loss)~~ per share is calculated on the basis of weighted average outstanding shares of common ~~shares.~~stock. Diluted earnings ~~(loss)~~ per share is computed on the basis of basic weighted average outstanding shares of common ~~shares~~stock adjusted for the dilutive effect of stock options, restricted stock unit awards, and other dilutive securities.

The following table reconciles the income and average share amounts used to compute both basic and diluted earnings ~~(loss)~~ per share:


	Thirteen weeks ended				Twenty-six weeks ended					Thirteen weeks ended				Twenty-six weeks ended
	November 27, 2016		November 29, 2015		November 27, 2016		November 29, 2015			November 26, 2017		November 27, 2016		November 26, 2017		November 27, 2016
Net income (loss) available to Conagra Brands, Inc. common stockholders:
Net income available to Conagra Brands, Inc. common stockholders:
Income from continuing operations attributable to Conagra Brands, Inc. common stockholders	$	113.7	$	79.4	$	212.1	$	172.8		$	223.1	$	113.7	$	375.9	$	212.1
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax, attributable to Conagra Brands, Inc. common stockholders	8.4		75.5		96.2		(1,172.0		)
Net income (loss) attributable to Conagra Brands, Inc. common stockholders	$	122.1	$	154.9	$	308.3	$	(999.2	)
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax, attributable to Conagra Brands, Inc. common stockholders										0.4		8.4		0.1		96.2
Net income attributable to Conagra Brands, Inc. common stockholders										$	223.5	$	122.1	$	376.0	$	308.3
Less: Increase in redemption value of noncontrolling interests in excess of earnings allocated	0.3		0.5		0.8		0.9			—		0.3		—		0.8
Net income (loss) available to Conagra Brands, Inc. common stockholders	$	121.8	$	154.4	$	307.5	$	(1,000.1	)
Net income available to Conagra Brands, Inc. common stockholders										$	223.5	$	121.8	$	376.0	$	307.5
Weighted average shares outstanding:
Basic weighted average shares outstanding	437.7		433.8		438.4		432.1			406.5		437.7		411.1		438.4
Add: Dilutive effect of stock options, restricted stock unit awards, and other dilutive securities	3.6		4.1		3.7		4.6			3.9		3.6		4.0		3.7
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding	441.3		437.9		442.1		436.7			410.4		441.3		415.1		442.1

For both the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2018, there were 1.4 million stock options outstanding that were excluded from the computation of diluted weighted average shares because the effect was antidilutive. For the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2017, there were 1.5 million and 1.1 million stock options outstanding, respectively, that were excluded from the computation of shares contingently issuable upon exercise primarily because exercise prices exceeded the average market value of our common stock during the period. For the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2016, there were 1.5 million and 0.9 million stock options outstanding, respectively, that were excluded from the calculation.

11. INVENTORIES

The major classes of inventories were as follows:


	November 27, 2016		May 29, 2016		November 26, 2017		May 28, 2017
Raw materials and packaging	$	187.2	$	214.3	$	204.2	$	182.1
Work in process	140.0		119.4		124.9		91.9
Finished goods	736.8		698.6		682.2		612.9
Supplies and other	49.7		50.9		47.9		47.3
Total	$	1,113.7	$	1,083.2	$	1,059.2	$	934.2

12. INCOME TAXES

Income tax expense from continuing operations for the second quarter of fiscal 2018 and 2017 ~~and 2016~~ was ~~$78.4~~$109.5 million and ~~$43.1~~$78.4 million, respectively. Income tax expense from continuing operations for the first half of fiscal 2018 and 2017 ~~and 2016~~ was ~~$247.6~~$229.5 million and ~~$92.4~~$247.6 million, respectively. The effective tax rate (calculated as the ratio of income tax expense to pre-tax income from continuing operations, inclusive of equity method investment earnings) from continuing operations was ~~40.7%~~32.8% and ~~35.0%~~40.7% for the second quarter of fiscal ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016,~~2017, respectively. The effective tax rate from continuing operations was ~~53.8%~~37.8% and ~~34.7%~~53.8% for the first half of fiscal ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016,~~2017, respectively.

The ~~higher~~effective tax rate in the second quarter of fiscal 2018 reflects the following:

an income tax benefit allowed upon the vesting/exercise of employee stock compensation awards by our employees, beyond that which is attributable to the original fair value of the awards upon the date of grant,

additional income tax expense related to state taxes, and

an income tax benefit related to a change in estimate of the income tax effect of undistributed foreign earnings for which the indefinite reinvestment assertion is no longer made.

The effective tax rate for the first half of fiscal 2018 reflects the above-cited items, as well as additional expense related to the repatriation of cash from foreign subsidiaries and the tax expense related to undistributed foreign earnings for which the indefinite reinvestment assertion is no longer made.

The effective tax rate in the second quarter of fiscal 2017 reflects the following:

~~additional~~an income tax ~~expense associated with non-deductible goodwill in~~benefit allowed upon the vesting/exercise of employee stock compensation awards by our ~~Mexican business, for~~employees, beyond that which ~~an impairment charge was recognized and~~is attributable to the original fair value of the awards upon the date of grant,

additional tax expense associated with a change in estimate regarding the tax basis of the Spicetec business that was sold in the first quarter of fiscal ~~2017.~~2017, and

additional tax expense associated with non-deductible goodwill in our Mexican business, for which an impairment charge was recognized.

The effective tax rate for the first half of fiscal 2017 reflects the above-cited items, as well as the following:

additional tax expense associated with non-deductible goodwill sold in connection with the dispositions of the Spicetec and JM Swank businesses,

additional tax expense associated with non-deductible goodwill in our Canadian business, for which an impairment charge was recognized,

an income tax benefit for excess tax benefits allowed upon the vesting/exercise of employee stock compensation awards by our employees, beyond that which is attributable to the original fair value of the awards upon the date of grant, and

an income tax benefit associated with a tax planning strategy that allowed us to utilize certain state tax attributes.

The amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits for uncertain tax positions ~~including positions impacting only the timing of tax benefits,~~ was ~~$31.7~~$34.0 million as of November ~~27, 2016~~26, 2017 and ~~$33.0~~$39.3 million as of May ~~29, 2016.~~28, 2017. There were no balances included as of ~~both~~either November ~~27, 2016 and~~26, 2017 or May ~~29, 2016,~~28, 2017, for tax positions for which the ultimate deductibility is highly certain but for which there is uncertainty about the timing of such deductibility. The gross unrecognized tax benefits excluded related liabilities for gross interest and penalties of ~~$6.8~~$7.1 million and ~~$6.6~~$6.0 million as of November ~~27, 2016~~26, 2017 and May ~~29, 2016,~~28, 2017, respectively.

The net amount of unrecognized tax benefits at November ~~27, 2016~~26, 2017 and May ~~29, 2016~~28, 2017 that, if recognized, would impact the Company's effective tax rate was ~~$23.5~~$25.7 million and ~~$24.5~~$31.6 million,, respectively. Included in those amounts is $6.6 million and $15.6 million, respectively, that would be reported in discontinued operations. Recognition of these tax benefits would have a favorable impact on the Company's effective tax rate.

We estimate that it is reasonably possible that the amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits will decrease by up to ~~$8.7~~$9.4 million over the next twelve months due to various federal, state, and foreign audit settlements and the expiration of statutes of limitations.

As of November ~~27, 2016~~26, 2017 and May ~~29, 2016,~~28, 2017, we had a deferred tax asset of ~~$1.19~~$1.09 billion and ~~$1.54~~$1.08 billion, respectively, that was generated from the capital loss realized on the sale of the Private Brands operations with corresponding valuation allowances of ~~$1.19 billion~~$995.1 million and ~~$1.40 billion,~~$990.9 million, respectively, to reflect the uncertainty regarding the ultimate realization of the tax asset. During the first half of fiscal ~~2017,~~2018, the balance of the deferred tax asset was adjusted for the ~~revised estimates~~impact of ~~the capital gains realized on the sales of the Spicetec and JM Swank businesses, the~~state law changes, realization of certain tax attributes, ~~based upon~~and the settlement of certain tax indemnity claims under the contract terms of the Private Brands ~~sale,~~sale.

Historically, we have not provided U.S. deferred taxes on the cumulative undistributed earnings of our foreign subsidiaries. During the first quarter of fiscal 2018, we decided to repatriate certain cash balances then held in Italy, Canada, Mexico, the Netherlands, and ~~utilization~~Luxembourg due to the timing of ~~the estimated tax asset to offset capital gains on previously deferred intercompany transactions that were triggered by the~~

~~Spinoff. During~~cash flows in connection with certain business acquisition and divestiture activity, as well as forecasted levels of short-term borrowings. We repatriated $151.3 million during the second quarter of fiscal ~~2017, $150.4~~2018. The cash repatriation resulted in the repatriation of $115.0 million in previously undistributed earnings of our foreign subsidiaries. As a result of the repatriation, we have recognized $11.8 million of ~~the reduction~~income tax expense in the first half of fiscal 2018.

In conjunction with this repatriation, we have determined that additional previously undistributed earnings of certain foreign subsidiaries no longer meet the requirements for indefinite reinvestment under applicable accounting guidance and, therefore, recognized an additional $6.8 million of income tax expense in the first half of fiscal 2018.

An additional $2.5 million and $6.8 million of income tax expense was recognized in the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2018, respectively, primarily related to a valuation allowance on foreign tax credits generated in the current year and prior periods.

We continue to believe the remaining undistributed earnings of our foreign subsidiaries, after taking into account the above transactions, are indefinitely reinvested and therefore have not provided any additional U.S. deferred taxes.

On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act was ~~recorded~~signed into law. We are in ~~stockholders' equity as part~~the process of evaluating the impact of the ~~Spinoff.~~recently enacted law to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. The impact is expected to be material to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

13. CONTINGENCIES

InWe are a party to various environmental proceedings and litigation, primarily related to our acquisition in fiscal 1991 ~~we acquired~~of Beatrice Company ~~(“Beatrice”~~("Beatrice"). As a result of the acquisition of Beatrice and the significant pre-acquisition contingencies of the Beatrice businesses and its former subsidiaries, our condensed consolidated post-acquisition financial statements reflect liabilities associated with the estimated resolution of these contingencies. Such liabilities include various litigation and environmental proceedings related to businesses divested by Beatrice prior to our acquisition of Beatrice. The litigation proceedings include suits against a number of lead paint and pigment manufacturers, including ConAgra Grocery Products Company, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company (“("ConAgra Grocery ~~Products”~~Products"), and the Company as alleged successors to W. P. Fuller Co., a lead paint and pigment manufacturer owned and operated by a predecessor to Beatrice from 1962 until 1967. Although decisions favorable to us have been rendered in Rhode Island, New Jersey, Wisconsin, and Ohio, we remain a defendant in active suits in Illinois and California. The Illinois suit seeks class-wide relief for reimbursement of costs associated with the testing of lead levels in blood. In California, a number of cities and counties joined in a consolidated action seeking abatement of the alleged public nuisance. On September 23, 2013, a trial of the California case concluded in the Superior Court of California for the County of Santa Clara, and on January 27, 2014, the court entered a judgment (the ~~“Judgment”~~"Judgment") against ConAgra Grocery Products and two other defendants ordering the creation of a California abatement fund in the amount of $1.15 billion. Liability is joint and several. The Company ~~believes ConAgra Grocery Products did not inherit any liabilities of W. P. Fuller Co. The Company will continue to vigorously defend itself in this case and has~~ appealed the Judgment, toand on November 14, 2017 the California Court of Appeal for the Sixth Appellate District reversed in part, holding that the defendants were not liable to pay for abatement of homes built after 1950, but affirmed the Judgment as to homes built before 1951 and remanded to the trial court with directions to recalculate the sum to be paid into the abatement fund. The Company has petitioned the California Supreme Court for further review of the ~~State~~decision, which the Company believes to be an unprecedented expansion of current California law. In light of the unsettled nature of California ~~Sixth Appellate District. The Company expects~~public nuisance law and the ongoing appeal, ~~process to last several years. The absence of any linkage between ConAgra Grocery Products~~a loss is considered neither probable nor estimable, and ~~W. P. Fuller Co. is a critical issue (among others) that~~ the Company ~~will continue~~has accordingly not accrued any loss related to ~~advance throughout the appeals process. It~~this case. In addition, it is not possible to estimate exposure in ~~this case or~~ the remaining case in Illinois, which is based on different legal theories. If ultimately necessary, the Company will look to its insurance policies for coverage; its carriers are on notice. However, the extent of insurance coverage is uncertain, and the Company cannot ~~absolutely~~ assure that the final resolution of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on its financial condition, results of operations, or liquidity.

The current environmental proceedings associated with Beatrice include litigation and administrative proceedings involving Beatrice's possible status as a potentially responsible party at 37approximately 40 Superfund, proposed Superfund, or state-equivalent ~~sites.~~sites (the "Beatrice sites"). These sites involve locations previously owned or operated by predecessors of Beatrice that used or produced petroleum, pesticides, fertilizers, dyes, inks, solvents, PCBs, acids, lead, sulfur, tannery wastes, and/or other contaminants. In the past five years, Beatrice has paid or is in the process of paying its liability share at 3331 of these sites. Reserves for these ~~matters~~Beatrice environmental proceedings have been established based on our best estimate of the undiscounted remediation liabilities, which estimates include evaluation of investigatory studies, extent of required clean-up, the known volumetric contribution of Beatrice and other potentially responsible parties, and its experience in remediating sites. The accrual for Beatrice-related environmental matters totaled ~~$53.2~~$52.8 million as of November ~~27, 2016,~~26, 2017, a majority of which relates to the Superfund and state-equivalent sites referenced above.

~~We are~~ During the third quarter of fiscal 2017, a ~~party to a number of lawsuits and claims arising out of our ongoing business operations. These previously included lawsuits, claims, and other proceedings related to~~final Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study was submitted for the ~~February 2007 recall of our peanut butter products, including an investigation by the U.S. Attorney's office in Georgia and the Consumer Protection Branch~~Southwest Properties portion of the ~~Department of Justice. In May 2015, we negotiated a resolution of this matter,~~Wells G&H Superfund site, which ~~resulted in an executed plea agreement. On December 13, 2016, ConAgra Grocery Products pleaded guilty to a single misdemeanor violation~~is one of the ~~Food, Drug & Cosmetics Act.~~Beatrice sites. The U.S. ~~District Court~~Environmental Protection Agency (the "EPA") issued a Record of Decision (the "ROD") for the ~~Middle District of Georgia accepted the plea and imposed the agreed sentence pursuant to the terms~~Southwest Properties portion of the ~~plea agreement. ConAgra Grocery Products has now made payments totaling $11.2 million~~site on September 29, 2017, and will subsequently enter into negotiations with potentially responsible parties to determine final responsibility for implementing the ~~federal government, and the matter has been concluded. Expenses related to this payment were accrued in previous periods.~~ROD.

In June 2009, an accidental explosion occurred at our manufacturing facility in Garner, North Carolina. This facility was the primary production facility for our Slim Jim^® branded meat snacks. In June 2009, the U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives announced its determination that the explosion was the result of an accidental natural gas release and not a deliberate act. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011, we settled our property and business interruption claims related to the Garner accident with our insurance providers. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011, Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. ~~(“Jacobs”~~("Jacobs"), our engineer and project manager at the site, filed a declaratory judgment action against us seeking indemnity for personal injury claims brought against it as a result of the accident. During the first quarter of fiscal 2012, our motion for summary judgment was granted and the suit was dismissed without prejudice on the basis that the suit was filed prematurely. In the third quarter of fiscal 2014, Jacobs refiled its action seeking indemnity. On March 25, 2016, a Douglas County jury in Nebraska rendered a verdict in favor of Jacobs and against us in the amount of $108.9 million plus post-judgment interest. We filed our Notice of Appeal in September ~~2016.~~2016, and the case is awaiting decision by the Nebraska Supreme Court. The appeal will be decided directly by the Nebraska Supreme Court. Although our insurance carriers have provided customary notices of reservation of their rights under the policies of insurance, we expect any ultimate exposure in this case to be limited to the applicable insurance deductible.

We are party to a number of putative class action lawsuits challenging various product claims made in the Company's product labeling. These matters include Briseno v. ConAgra Foods, Inc., in which it is alleged that the labeling for Wesson^® oils as 100% natural is false and misleading because the oils contain genetically modified plants and organisms. In February 2015, the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California granted class certification to permit plaintiffs to pursue state law claims. The Company appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, which affirmed class certification in January 2017. The United States Supreme Court declined to review the decision and the case has been remanded to the trial court for further proceedings. While we cannot predict with certainty the results of this or any other legal proceeding, we do not expect this matter to have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, or business.

We are party to a number of matters challenging the Company's wage and hour practices. These matters include a number of putative class actions consolidated under the caption Negrete v. ConAgra Foods, Inc., et al, pending in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, in which the plaintiffs allege a pattern of violations of California and/or federal law at several current and former Company manufacturing facilities across the State of California. While we cannot predict with certainty the results of this or any other legal proceeding, we do not expect this matter to have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, or business.

In certain limited situations, we guarantee obligations of the Lamb Weston business pursuant to guarantee arrangements that existed prior to the Spinoff and remained in place following completion of the Spinoff until such guarantee obligations are substituted for

guarantees issued by Lamb Weston. Such guarantee arrangements are described below. Pursuant to the Separation and Distribution Agreement, dated as of November 8, 2016 (the "Separation Agreement"), between us and Lamb Weston, these guarantee arrangements are deemed liabilities of Lamb Weston that were transferred to Lamb Weston as part of the Spinoff. Accordingly, in the event that we are required to make any payments as a result of these guarantee arrangements, Lamb Weston is obligated to indemnify us for any such liability, reduced by any insurance proceeds received by us, in accordance with the terms of the indemnification provisions under the Separation Agreement.

Lamb Weston is a party to a warehouse services agreement with a ~~third party~~third-party warehouse provider through July 2035. Under this agreement, Lamb Weston is required to make payments for warehouse services based on the quantity of goods stored and other service factors. We have guaranteed the warehouse provider that we will make the payments required under the agreement in the event that Lamb Weston fails to perform. Minimum payments of $1.5 million per month are required under this agreement. It is not possible to determine the maximum amount of the payment obligations under this agreement. Upon completion of the Spinoff, we recognized a liability for the estimated fair value of this ~~guarantee in~~guarantee. As of November 26, 2017, the amount of ~~$30.5 million~~this guarantee, recorded in other noncurrent ~~liabilities.~~liabilities, was $28.9 million.

~~From time to time,~~

Lamb Weston ~~engages in foreign currency swap contracts. We have~~is a party to an agricultural sublease agreement ~~in place~~ with a third party for certain ~~bank counterparty~~farmland through 2020 (subject, at Lamb Weston's option, to ~~such derivative transactions to guarantee Lamb Weston’s obligations arising from any such derivative transactions. The maximum amount guaranteed under this~~extension for two additional five-year periods). Under the terms of the sublease agreement, ~~is $25 million. This agreement will expire in accordance with its terms in the first quarter of calendar 2017. As of November 27, 2016,~~ Lamb Weston ~~had no outstanding transactions under this agreement.~~

~~Federal income tax credits were generated in connection with Lamb Weston’s sweet potato production facility in Delhi, Louisiana. Third parties invested in these income tax credits.~~is required to make certain rental payments to the sublessor. We have guaranteed ~~these third parties~~ the ~~face value~~sublessor Lamb Weston's performance and the payment of all amounts (including indemnification obligations) owed by Lamb Weston under the ~~income tax credits over their statutory lives, through fiscal 2017,~~sublease agreement, up to a maximum of $75.0 million. We believe the farmland associated with this sublease agreement is readily marketable for lease to other area farming operators. As such, we believe that any financial exposure to the company, in the event that we were required to perform under the income tax credits are recaptured or reduced. The face value of the income tax credits was $26.7 million as of November 27, 2016. We believe the likelihood of recapture or reduction of the income tax credits is remote.guaranty, would be largely mitigated.

We lease certain office buildings from entities that we have determined to be variable interest entities. The lease agreements contain put options ~~which are~~ exercisable now and remain exercisable until generally 30 days after the end of the respective lease agreements, that allow the lessors to require us to purchase the buildings at the greater of original construction cost, or fair market value, without a lease in place. We have financial exposure with respect to these entities in the event ~~that~~ we are required to purchase the leased buildings for a price in excess of the then current fair value under the applicable lease purchase options. We are amortizing the difference between the ~~estimated~~ put price and the estimated fair value (without a lease agreement in place) of each respective property over the remaining respective lease term within selling, general and administrative expenses. As of November ~~27, 2016,~~26, 2017 and May 28, 2017, the estimated amount by which the put prices exceeded the fair values of the related properties was ~~$58.5~~$50.7 million, of which we had accrued $10.2 million and $8.4 million, respectively. In December 2017, subsequent to the second quarter of fiscal 2018, we purchased a building that had been subject to a put option. We will recognize a net loss of approximately $13 million for the early termination of the associated lease in our third quarter of fiscal 2018. Also in December 2017, we made an offer to purchase another property subject to a put option. We have ~~accrued $12.9 million. As these buildings are worth considerably more when under lease agreements than when vacant,~~not entered into a binding legal contract in connection with this offer. However, if our offer is accepted, we may ~~be able~~recognize an estimated loss of $30 million to ~~mitigate some, or all,~~$40 million, upon closing of the ~~related financial exposure created by~~transaction, for the early exit of an unfavorable lease contract. If this transaction is completed, we would have one remaining leased building subject to a put option for which the put ~~options~~option price exceeds the estimated fair value by ~~maintaining active lease agreements and/or by subleasing the buildings to creditworthy tenants. We do not expect to ultimately incur material financial losses~~$8.2 million, of which we had accrued $1.0 million, as ~~a result~~ of ~~the potential exercise of the lease put options by the lessors.~~November 26, 2017.

After taking into account liabilities recognized for all of the foregoing matters, management believes the ultimate resolution of such matters should not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, or liquidity. It is reasonably possible that a change ~~in one~~ of the estimates of any of the foregoing matters may occur in the future and, as noted, while unlikely, the lead paint matter could result in a material final judgment. Costs of legal services associated with the foregoing matters are recognized in earnings as services are provided.

14. PENSION AND POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS

We have defined benefit retirement plans ("plans") for eligible salaried and hourly employees. Benefits are based on years of credited service and average compensation or stated amounts for each year of service. We also sponsor postretirement plans which provide certain medical and dental benefits ("other postretirement benefits") to qualifying U.S. employees.

During the second quarter of fiscal 2018, we approved the amendment of our salaried and non-qualified pension plans effective as of December 31, 2017. The amendment will freeze the compensation and service periods used to calculate pension benefits for active employees who participate in the plans. Beginning January 1, 2018, impacted employees will not accrue additional benefit for future service and eligible compensation received under these plans.

As a result of the ~~Spinoff,~~amendment, we ~~recorded a pension curtailment gain of $19.5 million within other comprehensive income (loss) and re-measured a significant qualified~~were required to remeasure our pension plan liability as of ~~November 9, 2016.~~September 30, 2017. In connection with the ~~re-measurement,~~remeasurement, we updated the effective discount rate ~~assumed at May 29, 2016~~assumption from ~~3.86%~~3.90% to ~~4.04%~~3.78%. The ~~re-measurement~~curtailment and ~~the curtailment gain decreased~~related remeasurement resulted in a net decrease to the underfunded status of the pension plans by ~~$66.0~~$43.5 million with a corresponding ~~reduction to net loss~~benefit within other comprehensive income (loss) for the second quarter ~~and first half~~ of fiscal ~~2017.~~2018. In addition, we recorded charges of $3.4 million and $0.7 million reflecting the write-off of actuarial losses in excess of 10% of our pension liability and a curtailment charge, respectively.

Components of pension benefit and other postretirement benefit costs are (includes amounts related to discontinued operations):


	Pension Benefits												Pension Benefits
	Thirteen weeks ended						Twenty-six weeks ended						Thirteen weeks ended						Twenty-six weeks ended
	November 27, 2016			November 29, 2015			November 27, 2016			November 29, 2015			November 26, 2017			November 27, 2016			November 26, 2017			November 27, 2016
Service cost	$	15.9		$	23.8		$	32.6		$	47.6		$	13.2		$	15.9		$	25.9		$	32.6
Interest cost	29.9			41.0			59.9			82.0			27.7			29.9			55.9			59.9
Expected return on plan assets	(53.9		)	(66.8		)	(107.7		)	(133.7		)	(54.6		)	(53.9		)	(108.8		)	(107.7		)
Amortization of prior service cost	0.7			0.7			1.3			1.4			0.7			0.7			1.4			1.3
Recognized net actuarial loss													3.4			—			3.4			—
Special termination benefits	1.5			—			1.5			—			—			1.5			—			1.5
Benefit cost — Company plans	(5.9		)	(1.3		)	(12.4		)	(2.7		)
Curtailment loss													0.7			—			0.7			—
Benefit cost (benefit) — Company plans													(8.9		)	(5.9		)	(21.5		)	(12.4		)
Pension benefit cost — multi-employer plans	2.8			4.1			5.1			6.4			4.2			2.8			5.7			5.1
Total benefit cost (benefit)	$	(3.1	)	$	2.8		$	(7.3	)	$	3.7		$	(4.7	)	$	(3.1	)	$	(15.8	)	$	(7.3	)


	Postretirement Benefits												Postretirement Benefits
	Thirteen weeks ended						Twenty-six weeks ended						Thirteen weeks ended						Twenty-six weeks ended
	November 27, 2016			November 29, 2015			November 27, 2016			November 29, 2015			November 26, 2017			November 27, 2016			November 26, 2017			November 27, 2016
Service cost	$	0.1		$	0.1		$	0.1		$	0.2		$	—		$	0.1		$	—		$	0.1
Interest cost	1.0			1.9			2.1			3.9			0.9			1.0			1.8			2.1
Amortization of prior service benefit	(1.6		)	(2.0		)	(3.3		)	(4.0		)	(0.8		)	(1.6		)	(1.6		)	(3.3		)
Recognized net actuarial loss	0.1			—			0.2			—			—			0.1			—			0.2
Total cost (benefit)	$	(0.4	)	$	—		$	(0.9	)	$	0.1		$	0.1		$	(0.4	)	$	0.2		$	(0.9	)

~~Beginning in fiscal 2017, the~~The Company ~~has elected to use~~uses a split discount rate (spot-rate approach) for the U.S. plans and certain foreign plans. ~~Historically, a single weighted-average discount rate was used in the calculation of service and interest costs, both of which are components of pension benefit costs.~~ The spot-rate approach applies separate discount rates for each projected benefit payment in the calculation of pension service and interest cost. This change is considered a change in accounting estimate and has been applied prospectively. The pre-tax reduction in total pension benefit cost associated with this change in the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2017 was approximately $7.4 million and $14.8 million, respectively.

The weighted-average discount rates for service and interest costs under the spot-rate approach used for pension benefit cost ~~in fiscal~~from May 29, 2017 through September 30, 2017, were ~~4.14%~~4.19% and ~~3.15%~~3.26%, respectively. The weighted-average discount rates for service and interest costs subsequent to ~~November 9, 2016~~September 30, 2017 are ~~3.67%~~4.04% and ~~4.01%~~3.24%, respectively.

During the second quarter and first half of fiscal ~~2017,~~2018, we contributed ~~$2.9~~$2.3 million and ~~$5.9~~$6.1 million, respectively, to our pension plans and contributed ~~$4.3~~$3.0 million and ~~$8.8~~$6.9 million, respectively, to our other postretirement plans. Based upon the current funded status of the plans and the current interest rate environment, we anticipate making further contributions of approximately $~~6.6~~6.8 million to our pension plans for the remainder of fiscal ~~2017.~~2018. We anticipate making further contributions of approximately $~~13.3~~11.8 million to our other postretirement plans during the remainder of fiscal ~~2017.~~2018. These estimates are based on ERISA guidelines, current tax laws, plan asset performance, and liability assumptions, which are subject to change.

During the second quarter of fiscal ~~2017, the Company provided a voluntary lump-sum settlement offer~~2018, we recorded an expense of $2.1 million related to ~~terminated vested participants in the~~our expected incurrence of certain multi-employer pension plan ~~expiring~~withdrawal costs. This expense has been included in December 2016 in order to reduce a portion of the pension obligation. Subsequent to the end of the second quarter of fiscal 2017, $287.5 million was distributed from pension plan assets in connection with this offer.restructuring activities.

15. STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

The following table presents a reconciliation of our stockholders' equity accounts for the twenty-six weeks ended November ~~27, 2016~~26, 2017:


	Conagra Brands, Inc. Stockholders' Equity																					Conagra Brands, Inc. Stockholders' Equity
	Common Shares	Common Stock		Additional Paid-in Capital			Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Treasury Stock			Noncontrolling Interests			Total Equity			Common Shares	Common Stock		Additional Paid-in Capital			Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Treasury Stock			Noncontrolling Interests		Total Equity
Balance at May 29, 2016	567.9	$	2,839.7	$	1,136.3		$	3,218.3		$	(344.5	)	$	(3,136.2	)	$	81.2		$	3,794.8
Balance at May 28, 2017																						567.9	$	2,839.7	$	1,171.9		$	4,247.0		$	(212.9	)	$	(4,054.9	)	$	87.0	$	4,077.8
Stock option and incentive plans				22.5			(0.4		)				49.2						71.3						(5.1		)	0.2						27.0					22.1
Adoption of ASU 2016-09							(3.9		)										(3.9		)
Spin-off of Lamb Weston							774.3			13.6									787.9
Spinoff of Lamb Weston																												15.5											15.5
Currency translation adjustment, net										(37.2		)				(1.8		)	(39.0		)										19.9								19.9
Repurchase of common shares													(207.6		)				(207.6		)													(580.0		)			(580.0		)
Unrealized gain on securities										0.3									0.3												0.4								0.4
Derivative adjustment, net										(3.6		)							(3.6		)										0.7								0.7
Activities of noncontrolling interests				(0.8		)										0.7			(0.1		)																1.8		1.8
Pension and postretirement healthcare benefits										37.7									37.7												26.7								26.7
Dividends declared on common stock; $0.50 per share							(219.3		)										(219.3		)
Dividends declared on common stock; $0.425 per share																												(174.4		)									(174.4		)
Net income attributable to Conagra Brands, Inc.							308.3												308.3									376.0											376.0
Balance at November 27, 2016	567.9	$	2,839.7	$	1,158.0		$	4,077.3		$	(333.7	)	$	(3,294.6	)	$	80.1		$	4,526.8
Balance at November 26, 2017																						567.9	$	2,839.7	$	1,166.8		$	4,464.3		$	(165.2	)	$	(4,607.9	)	$	88.8	$	3,786.5

On November 9, 2016, we completed the Spinoff of the Lamb Weston business. During the first half of fiscal 2018, the income tax basis of certain Lamb Weston assets and liabilities were finalized. The adjustment to Retained Earnings was recorded to reflect the adjustment to deferred income taxes.

16. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

FASB guidance establishes a three-level fair value hierarchy based upon the assumptions (inputs) used to price assets or liabilities. The three levels of inputs used to measure fair value are as follows:

Level 1 — Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities,

Level 2 — Observable inputs other than those included in Level 1, such as quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets or quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in inactive markets, and

Level 3 — Unobservable inputs reflecting our own assumptions and best estimate of what inputs market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.

The fair values of our Level 2 derivative instruments were determined using valuation models that use market observable inputs including interest rate curves and both forward and spot prices for currencies and commodities. Derivative assets and liabilities included in Level 2 primarily represent commodity and foreign currency option and forward ~~contacts, and cross-currency swaps.~~contracts.

The following table presents our financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis, based upon the level within the fair value hierarchy in which the fair value measurements fall, as of November ~~27, 2016~~26, 2017:


	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Net Value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Net Value
Assets:
Derivative assets	$	2.6	$	23.4	$	—	$	26.0	$	3.3	$	0.9	$	—	$	4.2
Available-for-sale securities	3.4		—		—		3.4		4.3		—		—		4.3
Total assets	$	6.0	$	23.4	$	—	$	29.4	$	7.6	$	0.9	$	—	$	8.5
Liabilities:
Derivative liabilities	$	—	$	0.7	$	—	$	0.7	$	—	$	2.0	$	—	$	2.0
Deferred compensation liabilities	48.9		—		—		48.9		53.7		—		—		53.7
Total liabilities	$	48.9	$	0.7	$	—	$	49.6	$	53.7	$	2.0	$	—	$	55.7


	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Net Value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Net Value
Assets:
Derivative assets	$	3.3	$	20.8	$	—	$	24.1	$	2.0	$	0.3	$	—	$	2.3
Available-for-sale securities	3.0		—		—		3.0		3.5		—		—		3.5
Total assets	$	6.3	$	20.8	$	—	$	27.1	$	5.5	$	0.3	$	—	$	5.8
Liabilities:
Derivative liabilities	$	—	$	0.6	$	—	$	0.6	$	—	$	1.3	$	—	$	1.3
Deferred compensation liabilities	40.0		—		—		40.0		47.2		—		—		47.2
Total liabilities	$	40.0	$	0.6	$	—	$	40.6	$	47.2	$	1.3	$	—	$	48.5

Certain assets and liabilities, including long-lived assets, goodwill, ~~asset retirement obligations,~~ and cost and equity investments, are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis.

In the first quarter of fiscal 2018, a charge of $4.7 million was recognized in the Corporate segment for the impairment of certain long-lived assets. The impairment was measured based upon the estimated sales price of the assets.

In the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2017, we recognized goodwill impairment charges in the International segment of $43.9 million and $183.1 million, respectively. ~~Also~~See Note 7 for discussion of the methodology employed to measure this impairment. We also recognized an impairment of an indefinite-lived brand totaling $24.4 million in the International segment in the first quarter of fiscal ~~2017, we recognized an impairment of a non-amortizing intangible asset of $24.4 million in the International segment.~~2017. The fair value of the ~~non-amortizing intangible asset, a~~ brand was estimated using the "Relief From Royalty" method.

The carrying amount of long-term debt (including current installments) was ~~$3.4~~$3.46 billion as of November ~~27, 2016~~26, 2017 and ~~$5.4~~$2.97 billion as of May ~~29, 2016~~28, 2017. Based on current market rates, the fair value of this debt (level 2 liabilities) at November ~~27, 2016~~26, 2017 and May ~~29, 2016~~28, 2017, was estimated at ~~$3.8~~$3.80 billion and ~~$5.9~~$3.32 billion, respectively.

17. BUSINESS SEGMENTS AND RELATED INFORMATION

~~In the first quarter of fiscal 2017, we reorganized our reporting segments.~~ We ~~now~~ reflect our results of operations in five reporting segments: Grocery & Snacks, Refrigerated & Frozen, International, Foodservice, ~~International,~~ and Commercial. ~~Prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the revised segment presentation.~~

In the second quarter of fiscal 2017, we completed the Spinoff of Lamb Weston. The Lamb Weston business had previously been included in the Commercial Foods segment. In the third quarter of fiscal 2016, we completed the divestiture of substantially all of the operations that were previously reported within the Private Brands segment. The results of operations of the Lamb Weston business and the Private Brands business have been classified as discontinued operations for all periods presented.

The Grocery & Snacks reporting segment principally includes branded, shelf-stable food products sold in various retail channels in the United States.

The Refrigerated & Frozen reporting segment includes branded, temperature controlled food products sold in various retail channels in the United States.

The International reporting segment principally includes branded food products, in various temperature states, sold in various retail and foodservice channels outside of the United States.

The Foodservice reporting segment includes branded and customized food products, including meals, entrees, sauces and a variety of custom-manufactured culinary products packaged for sale to restaurants and other foodservice establishments in the United States.

The Commercial reporting segment included commercially branded and private label food and ingredients, which were sold primarily to commercial, restaurant, foodservice, food manufacturing, and industrial customers. The segment's primary food items included a variety of vegetable, spice, and frozen bakery goods, which were sold under brands such as Spicetec Flavors & Seasonings^®. The Spicetec and JM Swank businesses were sold in the first quarter of fiscal 2017.

We do not aggregate operating segments when determining our reporting segments.

Intersegment sales have been recorded at amounts approximating market. Operating profit for each of the segments is based on net sales less all identifiable operating expenses. General corporate expense, net interest expense, and income taxes have been excluded from segment operations.


	Thirteen weeks ended					Twenty-six weeks ended					Thirteen weeks ended					Twenty-six weeks ended
	November 27, 2016			November 29, 2015		November 27, 2016			November 29, 2015		November 26, 2017		November 27, 2016			November 26, 2017		November 27, 2016
Net sales
Grocery & Snacks	$	853.9		$	906.1	$	1,611.1		$	1,706.6	$	900.4	$	853.2		$	1,646.2	$	1,610.4
Refrigerated & Frozen	740.0			826.8		1,344.6			1,484.4		758.1		740.7			1,373.8		1,345.3
International	211.4			221.3		406.1			427.7		220.3		211.4			411.2		406.1
Foodservice	283.1			285.0		551.1			555.6		294.6		283.1			546.4		551.1
Commercial	—			119.6		71.1			237.5		—		—			—		71.1
Total net sales	$	2,088.4		$	2,358.8	$	3,984.0		$	4,411.8	$	2,173.4	$	2,088.4		$	3,977.6	$	3,984.0
Operating profit
Grocery & Snacks	$	220.3		$	185.7	$	400.8		$	325.2	$	199.8	$	220.2		$	376.0	$	400.7
Refrigerated & Frozen	117.9			123.8		210.1			204.9		128.5		118.0			230.4		210.2
International	(26.7		)	20.1		(175.9		)	36.6		20.2		(26.7		)	39.1		(175.9		)
Foodservice	31.9			20.4		53.6			46.6		47.4		31.9			70.6		53.6
Commercial	(0.5		)	13.0		202.8			25.1		—		(0.5		)	—		202.8
Total operating profit	$	342.9		$	363.0	$	691.4		$	638.4	$	395.9	$	342.9		$	716.1	$	691.4
Equity method investment earnings	17.2			17.6		30.3			42.1		20.6		17.2			50.6		30.3
General corporate expense	113.3			178.2		148.9			255.1		44.9		113.3			85.1		148.9
Interest expense, net	54.1			79.2		112.3			159.3		38.0		54.1			74.4		112.3
Income tax expense	78.4			43.1		247.6			92.4		109.5		78.4			229.5		247.6
Income from continuing operations	$	114.3		$	80.1	$	212.9		$	173.7	$	224.1	$	114.3		$	377.7	$	212.9
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests of continuing operations	0.6			0.7		0.8			0.9		1.0		0.6			1.8		0.8
Income from continuing operations attributable to Conagra Brands, Inc.	$	113.7		$	79.4	$	212.1		$	172.8	$	223.1	$	113.7		$	375.9	$	212.1

Presentation of Derivative Gains (Losses) for Economic Hedges of Forecasted Cash Flows in Segment Results

Derivatives used to manage commodity price risk and foreign currency risk are not designated for hedge accounting treatment. We believe these derivatives provide economic hedges of certain forecasted transactions. As such, these derivatives are recognized at fair market value with realized and unrealized gains and losses recognized in general corporate expenses. The gains and losses are subsequently recognized in the operating results of the reporting segments in the period in which the underlying transaction being economically hedged is included in earnings. In the event that management determines a particular derivative entered into as an economic hedge of a forecasted commodity purchase has ceased to function as an economic hedge, we cease recognizing further gains and losses on such derivatives in corporate expense and begin recognizing such gains and losses within segment operating results, immediately.

The following table presents the net derivative gains (losses) from economic hedges of forecasted commodity consumption and the foreign currency risk of certain forecasted transactions, under this methodology:


	Thirteen weeks ended						Twenty-six weeks ended						Thirteen weeks ended						Twenty-six weeks ended
	November 27, 2016			November 29, 2015			November 27, 2016			November 29, 2015			November 26, 2017			November 27, 2016			November 26, 2017			November 27, 2016
Net derivative gains (losses) incurred	$	3.0		$	(3.8	)	$	2.7		$	(9.7	)	$	3.0		$	3.0		$	(4.4	)	$	2.7
Less: Net derivative gains (losses) allocated to reporting segments	3.8			(3.2		)	2.8			(9.9		)	(4.1		)	3.8			(5.5		)	2.8
Net derivative gains (losses) recognized in general corporate expenses	$	(0.8	)	$	(0.6	)	$	(0.1	)	$	0.2		$	7.1		$	(0.8	)	$	1.1		$	(0.1	)
Net derivative gains (losses) allocated to Grocery & Snacks	$	2.4		$	(1.3	)	$	2.0		$	(5.4	)	$	(0.4	)	$	2.4		$	(1.0	)	$	2.0
Net derivative gains (losses) allocated to Refrigerated & Frozen	0.7			(0.8		)	0.5			(2.5		)
Net derivative gains allocated to International Foods	0.2			—			0.2			—
Net derivative gains allocated to Refrigerated & Frozen													0.1			0.7			0.1			0.5
Net derivative gains (losses) allocated to International													(3.7		)	0.2			(4.4		)	0.2
Net derivative gains (losses) allocated to Foodservice	0.5			(0.5		)	0.2			(1.0		)	(0.1		)	0.5			(0.2		)	0.2
Net derivative losses allocated to Commercial	—			(0.6		)	(0.1		)	(1.0		)	—			—			—			(0.1		)
Net derivative gains (losses) included in segment operating profit	$	3.8		$	(3.2	)	$	2.8		$	(9.9	)	$	(4.1	)	$	3.8		$	(5.5	)	$	2.8

As of November ~~27, 2016,~~26, 2017, the cumulative amount of net derivative ~~gains~~losses from economic hedges that had been recognized in general corporate expenses and not yet allocated to reporting segments was ~~$2.0~~$1.9 million. This amount reflected net ~~gains~~losses of ~~$1.9~~$0.6 million incurred during the twenty-six weeks ended November ~~27, 2016,~~26, 2017, as well as net ~~gains~~losses of ~~$0.1~~$1.3 million incurred prior to fiscal ~~2017.~~2018. Based on our forecasts of the timing of recognition of the underlying hedged items, we expect to reclassify to segment operating results ~~gains~~losses of ~~$1.6~~$1.8 million in fiscal ~~2017~~2018 and ~~$0.4~~losses of $0.1 million in fiscal ~~2018~~2019 and thereafter.

Assets by Segment

The majority of our manufacturing assets are shared across multiple reporting segments. Output from these facilities used by each reporting segment can change ~~from fiscal year to fiscal year.~~over time. Also, working capital balances are not tracked by reporting segment. Therefore, it is impracticable to allocate those assets to the reporting segments, as well as disclose total assets by segment. Total depreciation expense was $55.6 million and $111.7 million for the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2018, respectively, and $58.2 million and $117.0 million for the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2017, respectively.

Other Information

Our largest customer, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and its affiliates, accounted for approximately 24% ~~and 23%~~ of consolidated net sales in each of the second quarter ~~of fiscal 2017~~ and ~~2016, respectively, and 23% of consolidated net sales in the~~ first half of ~~both~~ fiscal ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016,~~2017, primarily in the Grocery & Snacks and Refrigerated & Frozen segments.

Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and its affiliates accounted for approximately ~~24%~~28% and 26% of consolidated net receivables as of ~~both~~ November ~~27, 2016~~26, 2017 and May ~~29, 2016,~~28, 2017, respectively, primarily in the Grocery & Snacks and Refrigerated & Frozen segments.

We offer certain suppliers access to a third-party service that allows them to view our scheduled payments online. The third party service also allows suppliers to finance advances on our scheduled payments at the sole discretion of the supplier and the third party. We have no economic interest in these financing arrangements and no direct relationship with the suppliers, the third party, or any financial institutions concerning this service. All of our accounts payable remain as obligations to our suppliers as stated in our supplier agreements. As of November 26, 2017, $68.7 million of our total accounts payable is payable to suppliers who utilize this third-party service.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

The information contained in this report includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. Examples of forward-looking statements include statements regarding our expected future financial performance or position, results of operations, business strategy, plans and objectives of management for future operations, and other statements that are not historical facts. You can identify forward-looking statements by their use of forward-looking words, such as ~~“may”~~"may", ~~“will”~~"will", ~~“anticipate”~~"anticipate", ~~“expect”~~"expect", ~~“believe”~~"believe", ~~“estimate”~~"estimate", ~~“intend”~~"intend", ~~“plan”~~"plan", ~~“should”~~"should", ~~“seek”~~"seek", or comparable terms.

Readers of this report should understand that these forward-looking statements are not guarantees of performance or results. Forward-looking statements provide our current expectations and beliefs concerning future events and are subject to risks, uncertainties, and factors relating to our business and operations, all of which are difficult to predict and could cause our actual results to differ materially the expectations expressed in or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such risks, uncertainties, and factors include, among other things: changes in federal and state tax laws, including the recently enacted U.S. tax reform legislation;the ability and timing to obtain required regulatory approvals and satisfy other closing conditions for the pending Wesson^® oil divestiture and the pending acquisition of the Sandwich Bros. of Wisconsin^® business; our ability to achieve the intended benefits of acquisitions and divestitures, including the recent ~~spinoff~~Spinoff (as defined below) of our Lamb Weston business, the recent acquisition of Angie’s Artisan Treats, LLC, the proposed divestiture of the Wesson^® oil business, and the proposed acquisition of the Sandwich Bros. of Wisconsin^® business; general economic and industry conditions; our ability to successfully execute our long-term value creation strategy; our ability to access capital; our ability to execute our operating and restructuring plans and achieve our targeted operating efficiencies from cost-saving initiatives and to benefit from trade optimization programs; the effectiveness of our hedging activities ~~including~~and our ability to respond to volatility in ~~commodities that could negatively impact our derivative positions and, in turn, our earnings;~~commodities; the competitive environment and related market conditions; our ability to respond to changing consumer preferences and the success of our innovation and marketing investments; the ultimate impact of any product recalls and litigation, including litigation related to the lead paint and pigment matters; actions of governments and regulatory factors affecting our ~~businesses, including the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act;~~businesses; the availability and prices of raw materials, including any negative effects caused by inflation or weather conditions; risks and uncertainties associated with intangible assets, including any future goodwill or intangible assets impairment charges; ~~our ability to realize the synergies and benefits contemplated by the Ardent Mills joint venture;~~ the costs, disruption, and diversion of ~~management’s~~management's attention associated with campaigns commenced by activist investors; and other risks described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K and other reports we file with the Securities and Exchange ~~Commission.~~Commission (the "SEC"). We caution readers not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this report. We undertake no responsibility to update these statements.

The discussion that follows should be read together with the unaudited ~~condensed consolidated financial statements~~Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes contained in this report and with the financial statements, related notes, and Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May ~~29, 2016.~~28, 2017 and subsequent filings with the SEC. Results for the second quarter of fiscal ~~2017~~2018 are not necessarily indicative of results that may be attained in the future.

Fiscal ~~2017~~2018 Second Quarter Executive Overview

Conagra Brands, Inc. (the "Company", "we", "us", or "our"), headquartered in Chicago, is one of North America's leading branded food companies. Guided by an entrepreneurial spirit, the Company combines a rich heritage of making great food with a sharpened focus on innovation. The Company's portfolio is evolving to satisfy people's changing food preferences. Its iconic brands such as Marie Callender's^®, Reddi-wip^®, Hunt's^®, Healthy Choice^®, Slim Jim^®, and Orville Redenbacher's^®, as well as emerging brands, including Alexia^®, Angie's^®BOOMCHICKAPOP^®, Blake's^®, Duke's^®,and Frontera^®, offer choices for every occasion. ~~With an ongoing commitment to corporate citizenship, the Company has been named to the Dow Jones Sustainability™ North America Index for six consecutive years.~~

On November 9, 2016, we completed the ~~previously announced~~ spinoff of Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. (“("Lamb ~~Weston”~~Weston") through a distribution of 100% of ~~the Company's~~our interest in Lamb Weston to holders, as of November 1, 2016, of outstanding shares of ~~the Company's~~our common stock (the "Spinoff"). The transaction effecting this change was structured as a tax-free spinoff.

In the first quarter of fiscal 2017, in anticipation of the Spinoff, we reorganized our reporting segments. We now reflect our results of operations in five reporting segments: Grocery & Snacks, Refrigerated & Frozen, Foodservice, International, and Commercial. The results of operations for the Lamb Weston business have been reclassified to results ~~of discontinued operations and the assets and liabilities of the Lamb Weston business have been reclassified to assets and liabilities~~ of discontinued operations for all periods prior to the Spinoff.

In the first quarter of fiscal 2017, we completed the sales of our Spicetec Flavors & Seasonings business ("Spicetec") and our JM Swank business for combined proceeds of ~~$486.3~~$489.1 million. The results of operations of Spicetec and JM Swank are included in the Commercial segment.

In the second quarter of fiscal ~~2017,~~2018, earnings reflected ~~higher~~the impact of increased sales volumes, primarily the result of hurricane-related sales, and a gross margin ~~percentages~~increase in the ~~Grocery & Snacks,~~Foodservice segment, as well as higher operating profit primarily in the Refrigerated & Frozen and Foodservice ~~segments, more than offsetting the impact of lower sales volumes and the reduction of profits due to the divestitures of Spicetec and JM Swank in the first quarter of fiscal 2017.~~segments. The improved operating performance also reflected ~~significantly lower selling, general and administrative ("SG&A") expenses,~~an increase in equity method investment earnings and lower interest expense, in each case compared to the second quarter of fiscal ~~2016.~~2017. Overall operating performance was impacted by higher-than-anticipated inflation, hurricane-related costs, and increased investments to drive distribution and consumer trial.

Diluted earnings per share in the second quarter of fiscal 2018 were $0.54. Diluted earnings per share in the second quarter of fiscal 2017 were $0.28, including earnings of $0.26 per diluted share from continuing operations and $0.02 ~~per share from discontinued operations. Diluted earnings per share in the second quarter of fiscal 2016 were $0.35, including earnings of $0.18 per diluted share from continuing operations and $0.17~~ per diluted share from discontinued operations. Several significant items affect the comparability of year-over-year results of continuing operations (see "Items Impacting Comparability" below).

Items Impacting Comparability

Segment presentation of gains and losses from derivatives used for economic hedging of anticipated commodity input costs and economic hedging of foreign currency exchange rate risks of anticipated transactions is discussed in the segment review below.

Items of note impacting comparability for the second quarter of fiscal 2018 included the following:

charges totaling $7.1 million ($4.6 million after-tax) in connection with our SCAE Plan (as defined below),

charges totaling $7.8 million ($5.0 million after-tax) associated with costs incurred for acquisitions and planned divestitures,

charges totaling $4.1 million ($2.5 million after-tax) related to a remeasurement of our salaried and non-qualified pension plan liability, and

an income tax benefit of $5.3 million related to an adjustment to the estimated tax expense resulting from the repatriation of cash during the second quarter from foreign subsidiaries and the tax expense related to the earnings of foreign subsidiaries previously deemed to be permanently invested.

Items of note impacting comparability for the second quarter of fiscal 2017 included the following:

charges totaling $60.6 million ($39.2 million after-tax) related to the early retirement of debt,

charges totaling $43.9 million ($40.7 million after-tax) related to the impairment of goodwill ~~and other intangible assets,~~in our International segment,

charges totaling $19.8 million ($12.9 million after-tax) in connection with our ~~Supply Chain and Administrative Efficiency~~SCAE Plan, ~~(the "SCAE Plan"),~~ and

an income tax expense of $7.4 million associated with a change in a valuation allowance on a deferred tax asset due to a change in the estimated capital gain on the Spicetec divestiture.

Items of note impacting comparability for the ~~second quarter~~first half of fiscal ~~2016~~2018 included the following:

charges totaling ~~$133.0~~$18.5 million ($~~82.2~~12.0 million after-tax) in connection with our ~~restructuring plans,~~SCAE Plan,

charges totaling $8.6 million ($5.5 million after-tax) associated with costs incurred for acquisitions and ~~income tax expense of $8.3~~planned divestitures,

charges totaling $4.1 million ($2.5 million after-tax) related to the ~~divestiture~~pension remeasurement, and

an income tax charge of ~~our Private Brands business.~~$22.5 million associated with the repatriation of cash during the second quarter from foreign subsidiaries and the tax expense related to the earnings of foreign subsidiaries previously deemed to be permanently invested.

Items of note impacting comparability for the first half of fiscal 2017 included the following:

charges totaling $207.5 million ($190.2 million after-tax) related to the impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets in our International segment,

gains totaling $197.7 million ($67.6 million after-tax) from the ~~sales~~divestiture of the Spicetec and JM Swank businesses,

charges totaling $60.6 million ($39.2 million after-tax) related to the early retirement of debt,

charges totaling $33.9 million ($22.0 million after-tax) in connection with our SCAE Plan, and

an income tax benefit of $7.5 million associated with a tax planning strategy that allowed us to utilize certain state tax attributes.

~~Items~~

Acquisitions

Subsequent to the end of ~~note impacting comparability for~~ the ~~first half~~second quarter of fiscal 2018, we entered into a definitive agreement to acquire the Sandwich Bros. of Wisconsin^®business, maker of frozen breakfast and entree flatbread pocket sandwiches, for a cash purchase price of $87 million, net of cash acquired and subject to working capital adjustments. The business will be primarily included in the Refrigerated & Frozen segment. The transaction is expected to close in early calendar year 2018, subject to customary closing conditions, including the receipt of any applicable regulatory approvals.

In September 2016, we acquired the operating assets of Frontera Foods, Inc. and Red Fork LLC, including the Frontera^®, Red Fork^®, and Salpica^® brands. These businesses make authentic, gourmet Mexican food products and contemporary American cooking sauces. We acquired the businesses for $108.2 million in cash, net of cash acquired. These businesses are included ~~charges totaling $150.4 million ($93.0 million after-tax)~~principally in the Grocery & Snacks segment, and to a lesser extent within the Refrigerated & Frozen and International segments.

Divestitures

During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017, we signed an agreement to sell our Wesson^® oil business, which is part of our Grocery & Snacks segment, to The J.M. Smucker Company ("Smucker"). The transaction is subject to certain customary closing conditions, including the termination or expiration of the waiting period under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 (the "HSR Act"). On August 28, 2017, Smucker and the Company each received a request for additional information under the HSR Act (a "second request") from the U.S. Federal Trade Commission ("FTC") in connection with ~~our restructuring plans,~~the FTC's review of the transaction. The agreement for the sale of the Wesson^® oil business provides that, unless otherwise agreed upon by the Company and ~~income tax expense~~Smucker, if the closing of ~~$8.3 million related~~the transaction has not occurred on or prior to March 31, 2018 because HSR approval has not been received as of such date, then either party may terminate the ~~divestiture~~agreement. The parties are cooperating fully with the FTC as it conducts its review of ~~our Private Brands business.~~

~~Discontinued Operations~~

the transaction.

On November 9, 2016, we completed the Spinoff of Lamb Weston. The results of operations of the Lamb Weston business have been reclassified to discontinued operations for all periods presented.

~~On February 1, 2016, pursuant to~~In the ~~Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as~~first quarter of ~~November 1, 2015, with TreeHouse Foods, Inc. ("TreeHouse")~~fiscal 2017, we completed the ~~disposition~~sales of our Spicetec and Flavors & Seasonings business ("Spicetec") and JM Swank business for combined proceeds of $489.1 million. The results of operations of Spicetec and JM Swank are included in the Commercial segment.

Restructuring Plans

In May 2013, we announced the Supply Chain and Administrative Efficiency Plan (the "SCAE Plan"), our plan to integrate and restructure the operations of our Private Brands business, ~~to TreeHouse for $2.6 billion in cash on a debt-free basis, subject to working capital~~improve selling, general and ~~other adjustments. The results of operations of the Private Brands business have been classified as discontinued operations for all periods presented.~~

~~Restructuring Plans~~

~~We previously announced a plan for the integration~~administrative ("SG&A") effectiveness and ~~restructuring of the operations of Ralcorp Holdings, Inc. ("Ralcorp"), optimization of the entire Company's~~efficiencies, and optimize our supply chain network, manufacturing assets, ~~and~~ dry distribution centers, and mixing ~~centers, and improvement of SG&A effectiveness and efficiencies, which~~centers. In fiscal 2016, we ~~refer to as the SCAE Plan. The SCAE Plan also includes~~announced plans ~~announced in the second quarter of fiscal 2016~~ to realize efficiency benefits ~~through a combination of reductions in~~by reducing SG&A expenses and ~~enhancements to~~enhancing trade spend processes and ~~tools.~~tools, which plans were included as part of the SCAE Plan. Although ~~the divestiture of~~we divested the Private Brands business, ~~was completed in the third quarter of fiscal 2016, resulting in the sale of substantially all the Ralcorp operations,~~ we ~~will continue~~have continued to implement the SCAE Plan, including ~~work related~~by working to ~~optimizing~~optimize our supply chain network, ~~and pursuit of~~pursue cost reductions through our SG&A functions, ~~enhancements to~~enhance trade spend processes and tools, and ~~productivity improvements.~~improve productivity.

Although we remain unable to make good faith estimates relating to the entire SCAE Plan, we are reporting on actions initiated through the end of the second quarter of fiscal ~~2017,~~2018, including the estimated amounts or range of amounts for each major type of costs expected to be incurred, and the charges that have resulted or will result in cash outflows. As of November ~~27, 2016,~~26, 2017, the Board of Directors of the Company has approved the incurrence of up to ~~$739.0~~$900.9 million of expenses in connection with the SCAE ~~Plan.~~Plan, including expenses allocated for the Private Brands and Lamb Weston operations. We have incurred or expect to incur approximately ~~$432.8~~$464.8 million of charges ($~~292.4~~320.7 million of cash charges and ~~$140.4~~$144.1 million of non-cash charges) for actions identified to date under the SCAE ~~plan.~~Plan related to our continuing operations. In the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2018, we recognized charges of $7.1 million and $18.5 million, respectively, in association with the SCAE Plan related to our continuing operations. In the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2017, we recognized charges of $19.8 million and ~~$33.9~~33.9 million, respectively, in ~~relation to~~association with the SCAE ~~Plan. In the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2016, we recognized charges of $133.0 million and $150.4 million, respectively, in relation~~Plan related to ~~the SCAE Plan.~~our continuing operations. We expect to incur costs related to the SCAE Plan over a multi-year period.

SEGMENT REVIEW

~~In the first quarter of fiscal 2017, we reorganized our reporting segments.~~ We ~~now~~ reflect our results of operations in five reporting segments: Grocery & Snacks, Refrigerated & Frozen, Foodservice, International, and Commercial. ~~Prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the revised segment presentation.~~

In the second quarter of fiscal 2017, we completed the Spinoff of the Lamb Weston business, which was previously included in the Commercial Foods segment. In the third quarter of fiscal 2016, we completed the divestiture of substantially all of the operations that were previously reported within the Private Brands segment. The results of operations of the Lamb Weston business and the Private Brands business have been classified as discontinued operations for all periods presented.

Grocery & Snacks

The Grocery & Snacks reporting segment principally includes branded, shelf stable food products sold in various retail channels in the United States.

Refrigerated & Frozen

The Refrigerated & Frozen reporting segment principally includes branded, temperature controlled food products sold in various retail channels in the United States.

International

The International reporting segment principally includes branded food products, in various temperature states, sold in various retail and foodservice channels outside of the United States.

Foodservice

Commercial

Presentation of Derivative Gains (Losses) from Economic Hedges of Forecasted Cash Flows in Segment Results


	Thirteen weeks ended						Twenty-six weeks ended						Thirteen weeks ended						Twenty-six weeks ended
($ in millions)	November 27, 2016			November 29, 2015			November 27, 2016			November 29, 2015			November 26, 2017			November 27, 2016			November 26, 2017			November 27, 2016
Net derivative gains (losses) incurred	$	3.0		$	(3.8	)	$	2.7		$	(9.7	)	$	3.0		$	3.0		$	(4.4	)	$	2.7
Less: Net derivative gains (losses) allocated to reporting segments	3.8			(3.2		)	2.8			(9.9		)	(4.1		)	3.8			(5.5		)	2.8
Net derivative gains (losses) recognized in general corporate expenses	$	(0.8	)	$	(0.6	)	$	(0.1	)	$	0.2		$	7.1		$	(0.8	)	$	1.1		$	(0.1	)
Net derivative gains (losses) allocated to Grocery & Snacks	$	2.4		$	(1.3	)	$	2.0		$	(5.4	)	$	(0.4	)	$	2.4		$	(1.0	)	$	2.0
Net derivative gains (losses) allocated to Refrigerated & Frozen	0.7			(0.8		)	0.5			(2.5		)
Net derivative gains allocated to International Foods	0.2			—			0.2			—
Net derivative gains allocated to Refrigerated & Frozen													0.1			0.7			0.1			0.5
Net derivative gains (losses) allocated to International													(3.7		)	0.2			(4.4		)	0.2
Net derivative gains (losses) allocated to Foodservice	0.5			(0.5		)	0.2			(1.0		)	(0.1		)	0.5			(0.2		)	0.2
Net derivative losses allocated to Commercial	—			(0.6		)	(0.1		)	(1.0		)	—			—			—			(0.1		)
Net derivative gains (losses) included in segment operating profit	$	3.8		$	(3.2	)	$	2.8		$	(9.9	)	$	(4.1	)	$	3.8		$	(5.5	)	$	2.8

As of November ~~27, 2016,~~26, 2017, the cumulative amount of net derivative ~~gains~~losses from economic hedges that had been recognized in general corporate expenses and not yet allocated to reporting segments was ~~$2.0~~$1.9 million. This amount reflected net ~~gains~~losses of ~~$1.9~~$0.6 million incurred during the twenty-six weeks ended November ~~27, 2016,~~26, 2017, as well as net ~~gains~~losses of ~~$0.1~~$1.3 million incurred prior to fiscal ~~2017.~~2018. Based on our forecasts of the timing of recognition of the underlying hedged items, we expect to reclassify to segment operating results ~~gains~~losses of ~~$1.6 million in fiscal 2017 and $0.4~~$1.8 million in fiscal 2018 and losses of $0.1 million in fiscal 2019 and thereafter.

Net Sales


	Net Sales												Net Sales
($ in millions)	Thirteen weeks ended						Twenty-six weeks ended						Thirteen weeks ended						Twenty-six weeks ended
Reporting Segment	November 27, 2016		November 29, 2015		% Inc (Dec)		November 27, 2016		November 29, 2015		% Inc (Dec)		November 26, 2017		November 27, 2016		% Inc (Dec)		November 26, 2017		November 27, 2016		% Inc (Dec)
Grocery & Snacks	$	853.9	$	906.1	(6	)%	$	1,611.1	$	1,706.6	(6	)%	$	900.4	$	853.2	6	%	$	1,646.2	$	1,610.4	2	%
Refrigerated & Frozen	740.0		826.8		(11	)%	1,344.6		1,484.4		(9	)%	758.1		740.7		2	%	1,373.8		1,345.3		2	%
International	211.4		221.3		(5	)%	406.1		427.7		(5	)%	220.3		211.4		4	%	411.2		406.1		1	%
Foodservice	283.1		285.0		(1	)%	551.1		555.6		(1	)%	294.6		283.1		4	%	546.4		551.1		(1	)%
Commercial	—		119.6		(100	)%	71.1		237.5		(70	)%	—		—		—	%	—		71.1		(100	)%
Total	$	2,088.4	$	2,358.8	(11	)%	$	3,984.0	$	4,411.8	(10	)%	$	2,173.4	$	2,088.4	4	%	$	3,977.6	$	3,984.0	—	%

Net sales for the second quarter of fiscal ~~2017~~2018 were ~~$2.09~~$2.17 billion, ~~a decrease~~an increase of ~~$270.4~~$85.0 million, or ~~11%~~4%, from the second quarter of fiscal ~~2016.~~2017. Net sales for the first half of fiscal ~~2017~~2018 were $3.98 billion, a decrease of ~~$427.8~~$6.4 million, or ~~10%,~~flat, from the first half of fiscal ~~2016.~~2017.

Grocery & Snacks net sales for the second quarter of fiscal ~~2017~~2018 were ~~$853.9~~$900.4 million, ~~a decrease~~an increase of ~~$52.2~~$47.2 million, or 6%, compared to the second quarter of fiscal ~~2016.~~2017. Grocery & Snacks net sales for the first half of fiscal ~~2017~~2018 were ~~$1.61~~$1.65 billion, ~~a decrease~~an increase of ~~$95.5~~$35.8 million, or 6%2%, compared to the first half of fiscal ~~2016.~~2017. Results for the second quarter of fiscal 2018 reflected a 3% increase in volumes, excluding the impact of acquisitions. The increase in sales volumes was driven by the recent hurricanes through inventory builds in both customer warehouses and consumer pantries in the second quarter of fiscal 2018, which are expected to negatively impact the third quarter of fiscal 2018. Price/mix decreased by 1% in the second quarter of fiscal 2018, compared to the second quarter of fiscal 2017, as a result of investing in higher quality merchandising events intended to drive increased brand saliency with consumers. Results for the first half of fiscal 2018 reflected a 1% decrease in volumes, excluding the impact of acquisitions, reflecting the prior quarter reduction in promotional intensity and planned discontinuation of certain lower-performing products. The acquisitions of Thanasi Foods LLC, BIGS LLC, and Angie's Artisan Treats, LLC contributed $26.4 million and $47.4 million to Grocery & Snacks net sales for the second quarter and first half of fiscal ~~2017 reflected a 7% decrease~~2018, respectively. The acquisition of Frontera Foods, Inc. and Red Fork LLC contributed $2.1 million and $8.6 million for the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2018, respectively, through the one-year anniversary of the acquisition, which occurred in volumes and a 1% increase in price/mix. The improvements in price/mix reflect reduced trade promotions and selective base price increases, which actions are intended to build a higher quality revenue base.September 2016.

Refrigerated & Frozen net sales for the second quarter of fiscal ~~2017~~2018 were ~~$740.0~~$758.1 million, ~~a decrease~~an increase of ~~$86.8~~$17.4 million, or ~~11%~~2%, compared to the second quarter of fiscal ~~2016.~~2017. Refrigerated & Frozen net sales for the first half of fiscal ~~2017~~2018 were ~~$1.34~~$1.37 billion, ~~a decrease~~an increase of ~~$139.8~~$28.5 million, or 9%2%, compared to the first half of fiscal ~~2016.~~2017. Results for the second quarter ~~of fiscal 2017 reflected an 11% decrease in volumes~~ and ~~a slight increase in price/mix. Results for the~~ first half of fiscal ~~2017~~2018 reflected ~~an 11% decrease in volume~~a 4% and ~~a 2%~~3% increase in ~~price/mix.~~volumes, respectively, excluding the impact of acquisitions. The ~~decrease~~increase in sales volumes was a result of core business improvements and ~~improvements in price/~~innovation launches. Price/mix ~~reflect reduced trade promotions~~decreased by 2% and selective base price increases, together with stock-keeping unit rationalization, which actions are intended to build a higher quality revenue base. Net sales were also negatively affected by a transitory increase1% in the ~~volume~~second quarter and first half of ~~Egg Beaters’ last year as~~fiscal 2018, respectively, in each case compared to the ~~Company’s egg supply was not negatively impacted by last year’s avian influenza outbreak.~~prior-year period, primarily due to investments to drive distribution and trial. The acquisition of Frontera Foods, Inc. and Red Fork LLC, and subsequent innovation in those brands, contributed $1.0 million and $4.4 million to Refrigerated & Frozen net sales for the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2018, respectively, through the one-year anniversary of the acquisition, which occurred in September 2016.

International net sales for the second quarter of fiscal ~~2017~~2018 were ~~$211.4~~$220.3 million, ~~a decrease~~an increase of ~~$9.9~~$8.9 million, or 5%4%, compared to the second quarter of fiscal ~~2016.~~2017. International net sales for the first half of fiscal ~~2017~~2018 were ~~$406.1~~$411.2 million, ~~a decrease~~an increase of ~~$21.6~~$5.1 million, or 5%1%, compared to the first half of fiscal ~~2016.~~2017. Results for the second quarter of fiscal ~~2017~~2018 reflected a 3%2% decrease in volume, a 2% increase in price/mix, and a 4% ~~decrease~~increase from foreign exchange ~~rates.~~rates, in each case compared to the prior-year period. Results for the first half of fiscal ~~2017~~2018 reflected a 2%5% decrease in volume, a ~~5% decrease due to~~3% increase in price/mix, and a 3% increase from foreign exchange rates, ~~and a 2% increase~~ in ~~price/mix.~~each case compared to the prior-year period. The volume decrease in the second quarter and first half of fiscal ~~2017~~2018 reflected strategic decisions to eliminate lower margin products and a reduction in promotional intensity. The increase in price/mix for the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2018 was ~~due to significant shipments~~driven by improvements in ~~early fiscal 2016 due to recovery from the West Coast port disruptions during fiscal 2015, partially offset by strong vegetable sales in Mexico~~pricing and ~~Canada.~~trade productivity.

Foodservice net sales for the second quarter of fiscal ~~2017~~2018 were ~~$283.1~~$294.6 million, ~~a decrease~~an increase of ~~$1.9~~$11.5 million, or 1%4%, compared to the second quarter of fiscal ~~2016.~~2017. Foodservice net sales for the first half of fiscal ~~2017~~2018 were ~~$551.1~~$546.4 million, a decrease of ~~$4.5~~$4.7 million, or 1%, compared to the first half of fiscal ~~2016.~~2017. Results for the second quarter of fiscal ~~2017~~2018 reflected ~~flat sales~~a 7% decrease in volume and a ~~1% decrease~~

11% increase in price/~~mix.~~mix, in each case compared to the prior-year period. Results for the first half of fiscal ~~2017~~2018 reflected a 4%12% decrease in volumes and a 11% increase in ~~volume and a 5%~~price/mix, compared to the prior-year period. The decrease in ~~price/mix. Lower~~volumes primarily reflected the impact of exiting a non-core business, offset by a benefit in the current quarter related to the recent hurricanes. The increase in price/mix ~~was due~~reflected favorable product and customer mix, the impact of inflation-driven increases in ~~part to lower prices on egg products, as~~pricing, and the ~~supply~~execution of ~~eggs has recovered from~~ the ~~avian influenza outbreak that impacted fiscal 2016.~~segment's value over volume strategy.

Our Spicetec and JM Swank businesses were sold in the first quarter of fiscal 2017. These businesses comprise the entire Commercial segment following the presentation of Lamb Weston as discontinued operations. Accordingly, there were no net sales in the Commercial segment inafter the ~~second~~first quarter of fiscal 2017. These businesses had net sales of $71.1 million for the first half of fiscal 2017, prior to the completion of the divestitures. ~~Net sales in the Commercial segment were $119.6 million and $237.5 million in the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2016, respectively.~~

SG&A Expenses (Includes general corporate expenses)

SG&A expenses totaled ~~$417.9~~$307.3 million for the second quarter of fiscal ~~2017,~~2018, a decrease of ~~$65.3~~$110.6 million, as compared to the second quarter of fiscal ~~2016.~~ 2017. SG&A expenses for the second quarter of fiscal 2018 reflected the following:

Items impacting comparability of earnings

a charge of $7.8 million associated with costs incurred for acquisitions and planned divestitures,

a charge of $4.1 million related to a remeasurement of our salaried and non-qualified pension plan liability, and

expenses of $3.7 million in connection with our SCAE Plan.

Other changes in expenses compared to the second quarter of fiscal 2017

a decrease in advertising and promotion spending of $11.4 million and

an increase in self-insured worker's compensation and product liability expense of $9.0 million.

SG&A expenses for the second quarter of fiscal 2017 ~~reflected~~included the ~~following:~~following items impacting the comparability of earnings:

•charges totaling $60.6 million related to the early retirement of debt,

•charges totaling $43.9 million related to the impairment of goodwill ~~in the~~within our International segment, and

•~~a decrease in salaries expenses of $32.5 million,~~

•expenses of $18.0 million in connection with our SCAE ~~Plan,~~

•~~a decrease in pension and postretirement expense of $9.3 million,~~

•~~a decrease in incentive compensation expense of $9.6 million,~~

•~~a decrease in advertising and promotion spending of $9.5 million,~~

•~~a decrease in self-insured healthcare expenses of $5.3 million, and~~

•~~an increase in our stock-based compensation expense of $3.9 million.~~

~~SG&A expenses for the second quarter of fiscal 2016 included expenses of $127.2 million in connection with our restructuring plans.~~plan.

SG&A expenses totaled ~~$649.6~~$546.3 million for the first half of fiscal ~~2017,~~2018, a decrease of ~~$196.4~~$103.3 million, as compared to the first half of fiscal ~~2016.~~ 2017. SG&A expenses for the first half of fiscal 2018 reflected the following:

Items impacting comparability of earnings

expenses of $12.8 million in connection with our SCAE Plan,

a charge of $8.6 million associated with costs incurred for acquisitions and planned divestitures, and

a charge of $4.1 million related to the remeasurement of our salaried and non-qualified pension plan liability.

Other changes in expenses compared to the first half of fiscal 2017

a decrease in advertising and promotion spending of $21.2 million,

a decrease in share-based payment expense of $9.4 million, and

an increase in self-insured worker's compensation and product liability expense of $8.0 million.

SG&A expenses for the first half of fiscal 2017 ~~reflected~~included the ~~following:~~following items impacting the comparability of earnings:

•charges totaling $207.5 million related to the impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets ~~in the~~within our International segment,

•gains totaling $197.7 million from the divestiture of the Spicetec and JM Swank businesses,

•~~a decrease in salaries expenses of $65.5 million,~~

•charges totaling $60.6 million related to the early retirement of debt, and

•expenses of $26.9 million in connection with our SCAE ~~Plan,~~plan.

•~~a decrease in advertising and promotion spending of $23.8 million,~~

•~~a decrease in pension and postretirement expense of $16.9 million,~~

•~~a decrease in self-insured healthcare expenses of $10.2 million, and~~

•~~a decrease in incentive compensation expense of $8.3 million.~~

~~SG&A expenses for the first half of fiscal 2016 included expenses of $140.9 million in connection with our restructuring plans.~~

Operating Profit (Earnings before general corporate expenses, interest expense, net, income taxes, and equity method investment earnings)


	Operating Profit														Operating Profit
($ in millions)	Thirteen weeks ended							Twenty-six weeks ended							Thirteen weeks ended							Twenty-six weeks ended
Reporting Segment	November 27, 2016			November 29, 2015		% Inc (Dec)		November 27, 2016			November 29, 2015		% Inc (Dec)		November 26, 2017		November 27, 2016			% Inc (Dec)		November 26, 2017		November 27, 2016			% Inc (Dec)
Grocery & Snacks	$	220.3		$	185.7	19	%	$	400.8		$	325.2	23	%	$	199.8	$	220.2		(9	)%	$	376.0	$	400.7		(6	)%
Refrigerated & Frozen	117.9			123.8		(5	)%	210.1			204.9		3	%	128.5		118.0			9	%	230.4		210.2			10	%
International	(26.7		)	20.1		N/A		(175.9		)	36.6		N/A		20.2		(26.7		)	N/A		39.1		(175.9		)	N/A
Foodservice	31.9			20.4		56	%	53.6			46.6		15	%	47.4		31.9			48	%	70.6		53.6			32	%
Commercial	(0.5		)	13.0		N/A		202.8			25.1		708	%	—		(0.5		)	(100	)%	—		202.8			(100	)%

Grocery & Snacks operating profit for the second quarter of fiscal ~~2017~~2018 was ~~$220.3~~$199.8 million, ~~an increase~~a decrease of ~~$34.6~~$20.4 million, or ~~19%~~9%, compared to the second quarter of fiscal ~~2016.~~2017. Gross profits were ~~$8.4~~$12.0 million ~~higher~~lower in the second quarter of fiscal ~~2017~~2018 than in the second quarter of fiscal ~~2016.~~2017. The ~~higher~~lower gross profit was driven by ~~reduced trade promotions, improved plant productivity, and lower commodity~~the previously mentioned merchandising investments as well as the impacts of higher input costs ~~partially offset by lower sales volumes, due in part~~and transportation and warehousing costs associated with the recent hurricanes. The acquisitions of Thanasi Foods LLC, BIGS LLC, and Angie's Artisan Treats, LLC contributed $9.3 million to ~~pricing actions on certain products. SG&A expenses decreased by $26.2 million in~~Grocery & Snacks gross profit for the second quarter of fiscal ~~2017, as~~2018. The acquisition of Frontera Foods, Inc. and Red Fork LLC contributed $0.6 million in gross profit for the second quarter of fiscal 2018, through the one-year anniversary of the acquisition that occurred in September 2016. Advertising and promotion expenses for the second quarter of fiscal 2018 decreased by $3.9 million compared to the second quarter of fiscal ~~2016, largely as a result of cost reductions achieved through our restructuring plans, as well as a $7.2 million reduction in advertising and promotion expenses.~~2017. Operating profit of the Grocery & Snacks segment was impacted by charges of ~~$1.4~~$4.0 million and ~~$2.3~~$1.4 million in connection with our restructuring plans in the second quarter of fiscal 2018 and 2017, respectively. In addition, the second quarter of fiscal 2018 included $7.8 million in charges related to acquisitions and ~~2016, respectively.~~

planned divestitures.

Grocery & Snacks operating profit for the first half of fiscal ~~2017~~2018 was ~~$400.8~~$376.0 million, ~~an increase~~a decrease of ~~$75.6~~$24.7 million, or ~~23%~~6%, compared to the first half of fiscal ~~2016.~~2017. Gross profits were ~~$19.8~~$17.3 million ~~higher~~lower in the first half of fiscal ~~2017~~2018 than in the first half of fiscal ~~2016.~~2017. The ~~higher~~lower gross profit was driven by ~~reduced trade promotions,~~merchandising investments as well as the impacts of higher input costs and transportation and warehousing costs associated with the recent hurricanes, offset by improved plant ~~productivity,~~productivity. The acquisitions of Thanasi Foods LLC, BIGS LLC, and ~~lower commodity input costs, partially offset by lower sales volumes, due in part~~Angie's Artisan Treats, LLC contributed $15.8 million to ~~pricing actions on certain products. SG&A expenses decreased by $55.8 million in~~Grocery & Snacks gross profit for the first half of fiscal ~~2017, as~~2018. The acquisition of Frontera Foods, Inc. and Red Fork LLC contributed $2.1 million in gross profit for the first half of fiscal 2018, through the one-year anniversary of the acquisition that occurred in September 2016. Advertising and promotion expenses for the first half of fiscal 2018 decreased by $6.5 million compared to the first half of fiscal ~~2016, largely as a result of cost reductions achieved through our restructuring plans, as well as a $15.5 million reduction in advertising and promotion expenses.~~2017. Operating profit of the Grocery & Snacks segment was impacted by charges of ~~$6.3~~$10.2 million and ~~$4.7~~$6.3 million in connection with our restructuring plans in the first half of fiscal 2018 and 2017, respectively. In addition, the first half of fiscal 2018 included $8.6 million in charges related to acquisitions and ~~2016, respectively.~~planned divestitures.

Refrigerated & Frozen operating profit for the second quarter of fiscal ~~2017~~2018 was ~~$117.9~~$128.5 million, ~~a decrease~~an increase of ~~$5.9~~$10.5 million, or 5%9%, compared to the second quarter of fiscal ~~2016.~~2017. Gross profits were ~~$13.6~~$3.7 million lower in the second quarter of fiscal ~~2017~~2018 than in the second quarter of fiscal ~~2016,~~2017, driven by ~~decreased sales volumes,~~inflation and investments to drive distribution, enhanced shelf presence, and trial, partially offset by increased sales volumes and supply chain realized productivity. Advertising and promotion expenses for the ~~impact~~second quarter of ~~lower commodity input costs, increased net pricing primarily as a result~~fiscal 2018 decreased by $7.6 million compared to the second quarter of ~~reduced trade promotions, and improved plant productivity.~~fiscal 2017. Operating profit of the Refrigerated & Frozen segment was impacted by charges of $2.2 million ~~and $6.1 million~~ in connection with our restructuring plans in the second quarter of fiscal ~~2017 and 2016, respectively.~~2017.

Refrigerated & Frozen operating profit for the first half of fiscal ~~2017~~2018 was ~~$210.1~~$230.4 million, an increase of ~~$5.2~~$20.2 million, or 3%10%, compared to the first half of fiscal ~~2016.~~2017. Gross profits were ~~$19.3~~$5.2 million lower in the first half of fiscal ~~2017~~2018 than in the first half of fiscal ~~2016,~~2017, driven by ~~decreased sales volumes,~~inflation, absorption, and investments to drive distribution, enhanced shelf presence, and trial, partially offset by increased sales volumes and supply chain realized productivity. Advertising and promotion expenses for the ~~impact~~first half of ~~lower commodity input costs, increased net pricing primarily as a result~~fiscal 2018 decreased by $12.7 million compared to the first half of ~~reduced trade promotions, and improved plant productivity.~~fiscal 2017. Operating profit of the Refrigerated & Frozen segment was impacted by charges ~~totaling approximately $7.7 million in the first half of fiscal 2017 related to a product recall, as well as charges~~ of $7.2 ~~million and $10.2~~ million in connection with our restructuring plans, as well as $7.7 million related to a product recall in the first half of fiscal ~~2017 and 2016, respectively.~~2017.

International ~~incurred an~~ operating ~~loss~~profit for the second quarter of fiscal ~~2017~~2018 was $20.2 million, compared to an operating loss of $26.7 ~~million and earned an operating profit of $20.1~~ million in the second quarter of fiscal ~~2016.~~2017. The operating loss in the second quarter of fiscal 2017 ~~includes~~included charges totaling $43.9 million for the impairment of goodwill in our Mexican operations. Gross profits were ~~$3.3~~$3.2 million ~~lower~~higher in the second quarter of fiscal 2018 than in the second quarter of fiscal 2017, ~~than~~as a result of the value over volume strategy through reductions in ~~the second quarter~~promotional intensity, improvements in pricing, and trade productivity, and planned discontinuations of ~~fiscal 2016. Operating profits were negatively impacted by $5.6 million from the impact of foreign exchange rates in the second quarter of fiscal 2017 relative to the second quarter of fiscal 2016.~~certain lower-performing products.

International ~~incurred an~~ operating ~~loss~~profit for the first half of fiscal ~~2017~~2018 was $39.1 million, compared to an operating loss of $175.9 ~~million and earned an operating profit of $36.6~~ million in the first half of fiscal ~~2016.~~2017. The operating loss in the first half of fiscal 2017 ~~includes~~included charges totaling $207.5 million for the impairment

of goodwill and an intangible brand asset in our Canadian and Mexican operations. Gross profits were ~~$9.6~~$3.9 million ~~lower~~higher in the first half of fiscal 2018 than in the first half of fiscal 2017, ~~than in~~as a result of the ~~first half~~value over volume strategy and planned discontinuations of fiscal 2016, driven by the impact of foreign exchange rates. Operating profits were negatively impacted by $9.1 million from the impact of foreign exchange rates in the first half of fiscal 2017 relative to the first quarter of fiscal 2016.certain lower-performing products.

Foodservice operating profit for the second quarter of fiscal ~~2017~~2018 was ~~$31.9~~$47.4 million, an increase of ~~$11.5~~$15.5 million, or ~~56%~~48%, compared to the second quarter of fiscal ~~2016.~~2017. Gross profits were ~~$8.6~~$15.2 million higher in the second quarter of fiscal ~~2017~~2018 than in the second quarter of fiscal ~~2016.~~2017. The higher gross profit ~~was driven by an inventory write-down~~primarily reflected the increase in net sales as a result of the ~~second quarter~~recent hurricanes, favorable product and customer mix, as well as the impact of ~~fiscal 2016 at a foreign popcorn business that we have since exited.~~inflation-driven increases in pricing.

Foodservice operating profit for the first half of fiscal ~~2017~~2018 was ~~$53.6~~$70.6 million, an increase of ~~$7.0~~$17.0 million, or ~~15%~~32%, compared to the first half of fiscal ~~2016.~~2017. Gross profits were ~~$1.5~~$13.2 million higher in the first half of fiscal ~~2017~~2018 than in the first half of fiscal ~~2016. Foodservice realized lower~~2017. The higher gross ~~margins from egg-based products~~profit primarily reflected the increase in net sales as a result of the ~~first half of fiscal 2017,~~recent hurricanes, favorable product and customer mix, as well as the impact ~~from the egg supply disruption due to an avian influenza outbreak benefited results~~of inflation-driven increases in ~~the first half of fiscal 2016. This was~~pricing, offset by ~~an inventory write-down in~~ the ~~second quarter~~impact of ~~fiscal 2016 at~~exiting a ~~foreign popcorn business that we have since exited.~~non-core business. Operating profit of the Foodservice segment was impacted by charges of $1.8 million in the first half of fiscal 2017 in connection with our restructuring plans.

Commercial operating loss for the second quarter of fiscal 2017 was $0.5 ~~million, as compared to a $13.0 million operating profit in the second quarter of fiscal 2016.~~million. Commercial operating profit ~~was $202.8 million in~~for the first half of fiscal 2017 ~~and $25.1 million in the first half of fiscal 2016.~~was $202.8 million. The ~~Company~~company sold the Spicetec and JM Swank businesses in the first quarter of fiscal 2017, recognizing pre-tax gains totaling $197.7 million. These businesses comprise the entire Commercial segment following the presentation of Lamb Weston as discontinued operations. There are no further operations in the Commercial segment.

Interest Expense, Net

Net interest expense was ~~$54.1~~$38.0 million and ~~$79.2~~$54.1 million for the second quarter of fiscal ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016,~~2017, respectively. Net interest expense was ~~$112.3~~$74.4 million and ~~$159.3~~$112.3 million for the first half of fiscal ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016,~~2017, respectively. The decrease reflects the repayment of ~~$2.5 billion~~$550.0 million aggregate principal amount of outstanding notes in the first quarter of fiscal 2017 and ~~$554~~$473.0 million aggregate principal amount of ~~debt~~outstanding notes in the third quarter of fiscal ~~2016 and~~2017, as well as the ~~first~~exchange of $1.44 billion of debt in connection with the Spinoff of Lamb Weston during the second quarter of 2017. This was partially offset by the issuance of $500.0 million aggregate principal amount of floating rate notes due 2020 during the second quarter of fiscal ~~2017, respectively.~~

2018.

Income Taxes

In the second quarter of fiscal ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016,~~2017, our income tax expense from continuing operations was ~~$78.4~~$109.5 million and ~~$43.1~~$78.4 million, respectively. Income tax expense from continuing operations for the first half of fiscal 2018 and 2017 ~~and 2016~~ was ~~$247.6~~$229.5 million and ~~$92.4~~$247.6 million, respectively. The effective tax rate (calculated as the ratio of income tax expense to pre-tax income from continuing operations, inclusive of equity method investment earnings) was approximately ~~41%~~33% and ~~35%~~41% for the second quarter of fiscal ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016,~~2017, respectively. The effective tax rate ~~from continuing operations~~in the first half of fiscal 2018 and 2017 was ~~54%~~38% and ~~35%~~54%, respectively.

The effective tax rate in the second quarter of fiscal 2018 reflects the following:

additional income tax expense related to state taxes, and

an income tax benefit related to a change in estimate of the income tax effect of undistributed foreign earnings for which the indefinite reinvestment assertion is no longer made.

The effective tax rate for the first half of fiscal ~~2017~~2018 reflects the above-cited items, as well as additional expense related to the repatriation of cash from foreign subsidiaries and ~~2016, respectively.~~ the tax expense related to undistributed foreign earnings for which the indefinite reinvestment assertion is no longer made.

The ~~higher~~ effective tax rate in the second quarter of fiscal 2017 reflects the following:

additional tax expense associated with a change in estimate regarding the tax basis of the Spicetec business that was sold in the first quarter of fiscal ~~2017.~~2017, and

additional tax expense associated with non-deductible goodwill in our Mexican business, for which an impairment charge was recognized.

The effective tax rate for the first half of fiscal 2017 reflects the above-cited items, as well as the following:

additional tax expense associated with non-deductible goodwill sold in connection with the ~~divestitures~~dispositions of the Spicetec and JM Swank businesses,

additional tax expense associated with non-deductible goodwill in our Canadian business, for which an impairment charge was recognized,

an income tax benefit associated with a tax planning strategy that allowed us to utilize certain state tax attributes.

On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act was signed into law. We ~~expect~~are in the process of evaluating the impact of the recently enacted law to our ~~effective tax rate for the remainder of fiscal 2017~~Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. The impact is expected to be ~~approximately 33-34%.~~material to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Equity Method Investment Earnings

Equity method investment earnings were ~~$17.2~~$20.6 million and ~~$17.6~~$17.2 million for the second quarter of fiscal ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016,~~2017, respectively. Equity method investment earnings were ~~$30.3~~$50.6 million and ~~$42.1~~$30.3 million for the first half of fiscal 2018 and 2017, ~~and 2016,~~ respectively. ~~The decreases are reflective of lower profits from the~~ Ardent Mills ~~joint venture~~earnings were higher than they were in the prior-year periods due to ~~unfavorable wheat~~more favorable market ~~conditions.~~conditions and continued improvement in operating effectiveness.

Results of Discontinued Operations

Our discontinued operations generated an after-tax ~~income~~gain of ~~$11.6~~$0.4 million and ~~$79.2~~$11.6 million for the second quarter of fiscal 2018 and 2017, respectively. Our discontinued operations generated an after-tax gain of $0.1 million and ~~2016,~~$103.0 million for the first half of fiscal 2018 and 2017, respectively. ~~Results~~The prior-year period results reflected the operations of Lamb ~~Weston through the date of its Spinoff in November 2016, as well as the results of the Private Brands business prior to its divestiture in the second half of fiscal 2016.~~Weston. We incurred significant costs associated with effecting the ~~Spinoff.~~Spinoff of Lamb Weston. These costs are included in results of discontinued operations.

Our discontinued operations generated income of $103.0 million and an after-tax loss of $1.17 billion for the first half of fiscal 2017 and 2016, respectively. We recognized a pre-tax charge of $86.3 million ($79.0 million after tax) and $1.90 billion ($1.42 billion after-tax)Earnings Per Share

Diluted earnings per share in the second quarter ~~and first half~~ of fiscal ~~2016, respectively, to reflect our best estimate of the estimated net proceeds from the sale of the Private Brands business.~~

~~Earnings (Loss) Per Share~~

2018 were $0.54. Diluted earnings per share in the second quarter of fiscal 2017 were $0.28, including earnings of $0.26 per diluted share from continuing operations and $0.02 per diluted share from discontinued operations.

Diluted earnings per share in the ~~second quarter~~first half of fiscal ~~2016 was $0.35, including earnings of $0.18 per diluted share from continuing operations and $0.17 per diluted share from discontinued operations.~~

2018 were $0.91. Diluted earnings per share in the first half of fiscal 2017 were $0.70, including earnings of $0.48 per diluted share from continuing operations and $0.22 per diluted share from discontinued operations. Diluted loss per share in the first half of fiscal 2016 was $2.29, including earnings of $0.40 per diluted share from continuing operations and a loss of $2.69 per diluted share from discontinued operations.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Sources of Liquidity and Capital

Our primary financing objective is to maintain a prudent capital structure that provides us flexibility to pursue our growth objectives. If necessary, we use short-term debt principally to finance ongoing operations, including our seasonal requirements for working capital (accounts receivable, prepaid expenses and other current assets, and inventories, less accounts payable, accrued payroll, and other accrued liabilities), and a combination of equity and long-term debt to finance both our base working capital needs and our non-current assets. We are committed to maintaining an investment grade credit rating.

At November ~~27, 2016,~~26, 2017, we had a ~~$1.5 billion~~ revolving credit ~~facility. The~~ facility ~~has~~(the "Facility") with a syndicate of financial institutions that provides for a maximum aggregate principal amount outstanding at any one time of $1.25 billion (subject to increase to a maximum aggregate principal amount of $1.75 billion with the consent of the lenders). We have historically ~~been~~ used a credit facility principally as a back-up ~~facility~~ for our

commercial paper program. As of November ~~27, 2016,~~26, 2017, there were no outstanding borrowings under the ~~facility.~~Facility. The ~~facility~~Facility contains customary affirmative and negative covenants for unsecured investment grade credit facilities of this type. It generally requires ~~that~~ our ~~consolidated~~ratio of EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization) to interest expense to be not less than 3.0 to 1.0 and our ratio of funded debt to EBITDA to be not ~~exceed 65% of our consolidated capital base and that our fixed charges coverage ratio be~~ greater than ~~1.75~~3.75 to ~~1.0.~~1.0 (provided that such ratio may be increased at the option of the Company in connection with a material transaction), with each ratio to be calculated on a rolling four-quarter basis. As of November ~~27, 2016,~~26, 2017, we were in compliance with all financial covenants in the ~~facility.~~Facility.

As of November ~~27, 2016 and May 29, 2016,~~26, 2017, we had ~~no amounts~~$67.0 million outstanding under our commercial paper program. The highest level of borrowings during the first half of fiscal 2018 was $419.9 million. As of May 28, 2017, we had $26.2 million outstanding under our commercial paper program.

As of ~~November 27, 2016,~~the end of the second quarter of fiscal 2018, our senior long-term debt ratings were all investment grade. A significant downgrade in our credit ratings would not affect our ability to borrow amounts under the revolving credit facility, although borrowing costs would increase. A downgrade of our short-term credit ratings would impact our ability to borrow under our commercial paper program by negatively impacting borrowing costs and causing shorter durations, as well as making access to commercial paper more difficult.

We repurchase ~~our~~ shares of our common stock from time to time after considering market conditions and in accordance with repurchase limits authorized by our Board of Directors. During the second quarter of fiscal 2017, the Board of Directors approved an increase to its existing share repurchase program, authorizing an additional $1.25 billion of expenditures on the program, which authorization was contingent on the completion of the Spinoff. The increased share repurchase program is effective and has no expiration date. Under the share repurchase authorization, we may repurchase our shares periodically over several years, depending on market conditions and other factors, and may do so in open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions. WeThe share repurchase authorization has no expiration date. During the first half of fiscal 2018, we repurchased ~~4.1~~16.9 million shares of our common stock under this ~~program in the first half of fiscal 2017~~authorization for an aggregate of ~~$170.1~~$580.0 million. The Company's total remaining share repurchase authorization as of November ~~27, 2016~~26, 2017 was ~~$1.21 billion.~~

On November 9, 2016, we completed the Spinoff. In connection with the Spinoff, Lamb Weston issued to us $1.54 billion aggregate principal amount of senior notes (the "Lamb Weston notes"). On November 9, 2016, we exchanged the Lamb Weston notes for approximately $250.2 million aggregate principal amount of our 5.819% senior notes due 2017, $880.4 million aggregate principal amount of our 1.9% senior notes due 2018, $154.9 million aggregate principal amount of our 2.1% senior notes due 2018, $86.9 million aggregate principal amount of our 7.0% senior notes due 2019, and $71.1 million aggregate principal amount of our 4.95% senior notes due 2020 (the “Conagra notes”), which had been purchased in the open market by certain investment banks prior to the Spinoff. Following the exchange, we cancelled the Conagra notes. We also received a cash payment of $823.5 million from Lamb Weston as consideration for the Spinoff. To preserve the tax-free nature of the Spinoff, we must use the proceeds of this cash payment within twelve months of receiving it, and we may only use the proceeds for share repurchases, repayment of debt incurred prior to July 8, 2016, and dividends on shares of our common stock. As of November 27, 2016, we continued to hold $753.4 million of these cash proceeds.$802.0 million.

On December ~~7, 2016, our board~~12, 2017, the Board of ~~directors authorized~~Directors announced a quarterly dividend payment of ~~$0.20~~$0.2125 per share, which will be paid on March 1, ~~2017~~2018 to stockholders of record as of the close of business on January 30, ~~2017.~~2018.

During the second quarter of fiscal 2017, the Company provided a voluntary lump-sum settlement offer to terminated vested participants in the pension plan expiring in December 2016. Subsequent to the end of the second quarter of fiscal 2017, $287.5 million was distributed from pension plan assets in connection with this offer.

~~During the first~~fourth quarter of fiscal 2017, we ~~repaid~~signed an agreement to sell our Wesson^® oil business to Smucker. The transaction is subject to certain customary closing conditions, including the ~~entire~~termination or expiration of the waiting period under the HSR Act. On August 28, 2017, Smucker and the Company each received a second request from the FTC in connection with the FTC's review of the transaction. The agreement for the sale of the Wesson^® oil business provides that, unless otherwise agreed upon by the Company and Smucker, if the closing of the transaction has not occurred on or prior to March 31, 2018 because HSR approval has not been received as of such date, then either party may terminate the agreement. The parties are cooperating fully with the FTC as it conducts its review of the transaction. The purchase price under the agreement is $285 million.

In December 2017, we entered into a definitive agreement to acquire the Sandwich Bros. of Wisconsin^® business, maker of frozen breakfast and entree flatbread pocket sandwiches, for a cash purchase price of $87 million, net of cash acquired and subject to working capital adjustments. The transaction is expected to close in early calendar year 2018, subject to customary closing conditions, including the receipt of any applicable regulatory approvals.

We have access to the $1.25 billion revolving credit facility, our commercial paper program, and the capital markets. We believe we also have access to additional bank loan facilities, if needed.

We expect to utilize cash flows from operations and commercial paper issuances to finance the repayment of senior note principal ~~balance~~maturities totaling $189.7 million due in the second half of ~~$550.0 million of our floating rate notes on the maturity date of July 21, 2016.~~fiscal 2018.

Management believes that the Company's sources of liquidity will be adequate to meet required debt repayments, planned capital expenditures, acquisitions, working capital needs, and payment of anticipated quarterly dividends for the foreseeable future.

We expect to maintain or have access to sufficient liquidity to either retire or refinance senior debt upon maturity, as market conditions warrant, from operating cash flows, our commercial paper program, proceeds from any divestitures and other disposition transactions, access to capital markets, and our revolving credit facility.

Cash Flows

During the first half of fiscal ~~2017,~~2018, we ~~generated $608.0~~used $167.4 million of cash, which was the net result of ~~$542.2~~$420.7 million generated from operating activities, ~~$150.2~~$366.1 million ~~provided by~~used in investing activities, ~~and $80.9~~$230.5 million used in financing ~~activities.~~activities, and an increase of $8.5 million due to the effects of changes in foreign currency exchange rates.

Cash generated from operating activities of continuing operations totaled ~~$460.6~~$404.7 million in the first half of fiscal ~~2017,~~2018, as compared to ~~$16.6~~$460.6 million generated in the first half of fiscal ~~2016. Cash flows generated from~~2017. The decrease was the result of higher operating profits enabled by reductions in SG&A expenses, achieved in part through our restructuring plans, as well as improved gross margins increased the amount of cash generated from operating activities of continuing operations for the first half of 2017 compared to the first half of 2016. The increase was also driven by the timing of income tax payments ~~significantly lower inventory build, due~~attributable to ~~lower sales volumes~~continuing operations and ~~lower per case cost of inventories, increase~~changes in working capital primarily driven by increases in accounts ~~payable balance due to extension of certain vendor terms,~~receivable and ~~reductions of~~inventory. This was partially offset by decreases in interest payments, due to significant debt repayments induring fiscal 2017, and ~~2016. Incentive~~lower payments related to incentive compensation ~~payments in the first half of fiscal 2017 (earned in fiscal 2016) were $73.8 million higher than such payments made in the first half of fiscal 2016 (earned in fiscal 2015).~~and our restructuring plans.

The operating activities of discontinued operations generated ~~$81.6~~$16.0 million ~~for the second quarter of fiscal 2017~~ and ~~generated $335.5~~$81.6 million in the first half of fiscal ~~2016.~~2018 and 2017, respectively. This reflects the activities of the ~~Private Brands~~Lamb Weston business ~~we sold~~that was spun off on November 9, 2016 and other divested businesses.

Cash used in ~~the third quarter~~investing activities of ~~fiscal 2016. Operating cash flows of discontinued~~continuing operations totaled $366.1 million in the first half of fiscal ~~2017 were also impacted by expenses related~~2018, compared to ~~the Spinoff.~~

~~Cash~~cash provided ~~by investing activities~~ of ~~continuing operations totaled~~ $273.9 million in the first half of fiscal ~~2017 compared to cash used~~2017. Investing activities of ~~$104.3 million~~continuing operations in the first half of fiscal ~~2016.~~2018 consisted primarily of capital expenditures totaling $123.4 million and the purchase of Angie's Artisan Treats, LLC for $249.6 million, net of cash acquired. Investing activities of continuing operations in the first half of fiscal 2017 ~~consisted primarily of the~~included proceeds from the ~~divestitures~~sales of the Spicetec and JM Swank businesses totaling $489.1 million, ~~in the aggregate,~~ partially offset by capital expenditures of $118.3 million ~~which included several significant plant expansions and improvements,~~ and the purchase of the operating assets of Frontera Foods, Inc. and Red Fork LLC totaling $108.2 million, net of cash acquired. ~~Investing activities of continuing operations in the first half of fiscal 2016 consisted primarily of capital expenditures of $110.4 million.~~

Cash used in investing activities of discontinued operations in the first half of fiscal 2017 ~~and 2016~~ resulted ~~primarily~~mainly from capital expenditures.

Cash used in financing activities of continuing operations totaled ~~$80.9~~$230.5 million in the first half of fiscal ~~2017~~2018 and ~~$166.8~~$920.0 million in the first half of fiscal ~~2016.~~2017. Financing activities of continuing operations in the first half of fiscal ~~2017~~2018 consisted ~~primarily~~principally of common stock repurchases totaling $580.0 million, net proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt totaling $497.4 million, cash dividends paid of $171.6 million, and net short-term borrowings of $38.9 million, mainly under our commercial paper program. Cash used in financing activities of continuing operations in the first half of fiscal 2017 reflected long-term debt repayments ~~totaling~~of $555.8 million, cash dividends paid of $219.4 million, and common stock repurchases totaling $170.1 ~~million. Proceeds~~million, partially offset by net proceeds from employee stock option exercises and the issuance of other stock awards ~~were~~of $47.4 ~~million and $119.2 million in the first half of fiscal 2017 and 2016, respectively.~~

~~Cash used in financing activities of continuing operations in the first half of fiscal 2016 reflect debt repayments of $254.5 million and dividends paid of $215.0~~ million.

Cash provided by financing activities of discontinued operations in the first half of fiscal 2017 principally comprises borrowings by Lamb Weston, which were transferred in connection with the Spinoff.

The Company had cash and cash equivalents of ~~$1.44 billion~~$84.0 million at November ~~27, 2016~~26, 2017 and ~~$798.1~~$251.4 million at May ~~29, 2016,~~28, 2017, of which ~~$224.8~~$76.8 million at November ~~27, 2016~~26, 2017 and ~~$105.3~~$244.9 million at May ~~29, 2016~~28, 2017 was held in foreign countries. During the second quarter of fiscal 2018, the Company repatriated $151.3 million of cash balances previously deemed to be permanently reinvested outside the U.S. Refer to Note 12 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this report for more information related to this repatriation of cash and related adjustments to deferred tax liability. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, signed into law on December 22, 2017, will require the Company to pay tax on the unremitted earnings of its foreign subsidiaries. The Company ~~makes an assertion regarding~~is in the process of determining the amount of ~~earnings intended for permanent reinvestment outside~~that tax and expects to record an initial estimate of the ~~U.S., with~~impact on our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in the balance available to be repatriated to the U.S. The cash held by foreign subsidiaries for permanent reinvestment is generally used to finance the subsidiaries' operational activities and future foreign investments. No related tax liability has been accrued asthird quarter of November 27, 2016. At November 27, 2016, management does not intend to permanently repatriate additional foreign cash. Any future decision to repatriate foreign cash could result in an adjustment to the deferred tax liability after considering available foreign tax credits and other tax attributes. It is not practicable to determine the amount of any such deferred tax liability at this time.fiscal 2018.

Our estimate of capital expenditures for fiscal ~~2017~~2018 is approximately ~~$303.8~~$300 million. For the first half of fiscal ~~2017,~~2018, we have funded ~~$118.3~~$123.4 million of capital expenditures.

Management believes that existing cash balances, cash flows from operations, existing credit facilities, and access to capital markets will provide sufficient liquidity to meet our repayment of debt, including any repayment of debt or refinancing of debt, working capital needs, planned capital expenditures, planned share repurchases, and payment of anticipated quarterly dividends for at least the next twelve months.

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

We use off-balance sheet arrangements (e.g., leases accounted for as operating leases) where sound business principles warrant their use. We also periodically enter into guarantees and other similar arrangements as part of transactions in the ordinary course of business. These are described further in “"Obligations and ~~Commitments~~Commitments",” below.

Variable Interest Entities Not Consolidated

We have variable interests in certain entities that we have determined to be variable interest entities, but for which we are not the primary beneficiary. We do not consolidate the financial statements of these entities.

charges related to our divested Private Brands operations, these lease put options are exercisable now and remain exercisable until generally 30 days after the end of the respective lease agreements. We are amortizing the difference between the ~~estimated~~ put price and the estimated fair value (without a lease agreement in place) of each respective property over the remaining respective lease term within ~~SG&A~~selling, general and administrative expenses. As of November ~~27, 2016,~~26, 2017 and May 28, 2017, the estimated amount by which the put prices exceeded the fair values of the related properties was ~~$58.5~~$50.7 million, of which we had accrued $10.2 million and $8.4 million, respectively. In December 2017, subsequent to the second quarter of fiscal 2018, we purchased a building that had been subject to a put option. We will recognize a net loss of approximately $13 million for the early termination of the associated lease in our third quarter of fiscal 2018. Also in December 2017, we made an offer to purchase another property subject to a put option. We have ~~accrued $12.9 million. As these buildings are worth considerably more when under lease agreements than when vacant,~~not entered into a binding legal contract in connection with this offer. However, if our offer is accepted, we may ~~be able~~recognize an estimated loss of $30 million to ~~mitigate some, or all,~~$40 million, upon closing of the ~~financial exposure created by~~transaction, for the early exit of an unfavorable lease contract. If this transaction is completed, we would have one remaining leased building subject to a put option for which the put ~~options~~option price exceeds the estimated fair value by ~~maintaining active lease agreements and/or by subleasing~~$8.2 million, of which we had accrued $1.0 million, as of November 26, 2017. These leases, with the ~~buildings to credit worthy tenants. We do not expect to ultimately incur material financial losses as a result~~exception of ~~the potential exercise of the lease put options by the lessors. These leases~~one, are accounted for as operating ~~leases,~~leases. A capital lease asset and ~~accordingly, there are no material assets or liabilities, other than the accrued portion~~related lease obligation of ~~the put price, associated with these entities~~$25.3 million and $28.9 million, respectively, were included in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets ~~contained in this report.~~as of November 26, 2017. We have determined that we do not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of these entities. In making this determination, we have considered, among other items, the terms of the lease agreements, the expected remaining useful lives of the assets leased, and the capital structure of the lessor entities.

OBLIGATIONS AND COMMITMENTS

As part of our ongoing operations, we enter into arrangements that obligate us to make future payments under contracts such as lease agreements, debt agreements, and unconditional purchase obligations (i.e., obligations to transfer funds in the future for fixed or minimum quantities of goods or services at fixed or minimum prices, such as "take-or-pay" contracts). The unconditional purchase obligation arrangements are entered into in our normal course of business in order to ensure adequate levels of sourced product are available. Of these items, debt, notes payable, and capital lease obligations, which totaled ~~$3.4~~$3.5 billion as of November ~~27, 2016~~26, 2017, were recognized as liabilities in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets contained in this report. Operating lease obligations and unconditional purchase obligations, which totaled ~~$1.1~~$1.2 billion as of November ~~27, 2016~~26, 2017, were not recognized as liabilities in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets contained in this report, in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

A summary of our contractual obligations as of November ~~27, 2016~~26, 2017 was as follows:


	Payments Due by Period (in millions)										Payments Due by Period (in millions)
Contractual Obligations	Total		Less than 1 Year		1-3 Years		3-5 Years		After 5 Years		Total		Less than 1 Year		1-3 Years		3-5 Years		After 5 Years
Long-term debt	$	3,294.3	$	224.8	$	438.0	$	322.6	$	2,308.9	$	3,321.3	$	189.7	$	626.7	$	445.9	$	2,059.0
Capital lease obligations	135.3		9.3		17.2		17.0		91.8		127.0		9.1		16.8		17.6		83.5
Operating lease obligations	225.7		37.1		59.6		30.1		98.9		216.5		39.9		50.0		34.0		92.6
Purchase obligations¹and other contracts	995.3		889.4		67.6		36.4		1.9		1,038.2		856.9		114.3		65.3		1.7
Notes payable	6.7		6.7		—		—		—		67.1		67.1		—		—		—
Total	$	4,657.3	$	1,167.3	$	582.4	$	406.1	$	2,501.5	$	4,770.1	$	1,162.7	$	807.8	$	562.8	$	2,236.8

¹ Amount includes open purchase orders and agreements, some of which are not legally binding and/or may be cancellable. Such agreements are generally settleable in the ordinary course of business in less than one year.

We are also contractually obligated to pay interest on our long-term debt and capital lease obligations. The weighted average coupon interest rate of the long-term debt obligations outstanding as of November ~~27, 2016~~26, 2017, was approximately ~~5.5%~~4.8%.

The operating lease obligations noted in the table above have not been reduced by non-cancellable sublease rentals of ~~$1.7~~$0.9 million.

As of May ~~29, 2016,~~28, 2017, we had aggregate unfunded pension obligations totaling ~~$943.6 million. As of November 27, 2016, primarily as a result of our remeasurement, we had aggregate unfunded pension obligations totaling $851.6~~$565.1 million. This amount is not included in the table above, and we do not expect to be required to make payments to fund these amounts in the foreseeable future. Based on current statutory requirements, we are not obligated to fund any amount to our qualified pension plans during the next twelve months. We estimate that we will make payments of approximately ~~$10.2~~$15.2 million over the next twelve months to fund ~~current benefits of nonqualified~~our pension plans. See Note 14, Pension and Postretirement Benefits, to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this report and the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended May ~~29, 2016,~~28, 2017, Critical Accounting Estimates - Employment Related Benefits, for further discussion of our pension obligations and factors that could affect estimates of this liability.

As part of our ongoing operations, we also enter into arrangements that obligate us to make future cash payments only upon the occurrence of a future event (e.g., guarantees of debt or lease payments of a third party should the third party be unable to perform). In accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, the following commercial commitments are not recognized as liabilities in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets contained in this report. A summary of our commitments, including commitments associated with equity method investments, as of November ~~27, 2016~~26, 2017 was as follows:


	Amount of Commitment Expiration Per Period (in millions)										Amount of Commitment Expiration Per Period (in millions)
Other Commercial Commitments	Total		Less than 1 Year		1-3 Years		3-5 Years		After 5 Years		Total		Less than 1 Year		1-3 Years		3-5 Years		After 5 Years
Standby repurchase obligations	$	1.9	$	0.5	$	0.5	$	0.5	$	0.4	$	0.9	$	0.6	$	0.3	$	—	$	—
Other commitments	1.6		1.6		—		—		—		6.9		3.5		3.4		—		—
Total	$	3.5	$	2.1	$	0.5	$	0.5	$	0.4	$	7.8	$	4.1	$	3.7	$	—	$	—

In certain limited situations, we will guarantee an obligation of an unconsolidated entity. We guarantee certain leases resulting from the divestiture of the JM Swank business completed in the first quarter of fiscal 2017. As of November ~~27, 2016,~~26, 2017, the remaining terms of these arrangements do not exceed six years and the maximum amount of future payments we have guaranteed was ~~$5.2~~$3.4 million.

In certain limited situations, we also guarantee obligations of the Lamb Weston business pursuant to guarantee arrangements that existed prior to the Spinoff and remained in place following completion of the Spinoff until such guarantee obligations are substituted for guarantees issued by Lamb Weston. Such guarantee arrangements are described below. Pursuant to the Separation and Distribution Agreement, dated as of November 8, 2016 (the "Separation Agreement"), between us and Lamb Weston, these guarantee arrangements are deemed liabilities of Lamb Weston that were transferred to Lamb Weston as part of the Spinoff. Accordingly, in the event that we are required to make any payments as a result of these guarantee arrangements, Lamb Weston is obligated to indemnify us for any such liability, reduced by any insurance proceeds received by us, in accordance with the terms of the indemnification provisions under the Separation Agreement.

~~From time to time,~~ Lamb Weston ~~engages in foreign currency swap contracts. We have~~is a party to an agricultural sublease agreement ~~in place~~ with a third party for certain ~~bank counterparty to such derivative transactions to guarantee~~farmland through 2020 (subject, at Lamb Weston’s ~~obligations arising from any such derivative transactions. The maximum amount guaranteed under this~~option, to extension for two additional five-year periods). Under the terms of the sublease agreement, ~~is $25 million. This agreement will expire in accordance with its terms in the first quarter of calendar 2017. As of November 27, 2016,~~ Lamb Weston ~~had no outstanding transactions under this agreement.~~

~~Federal income tax credits were generated in connection with Lamb Weston’s sweet potato production facility in Delhi, Louisiana. Third parties invested in these income tax credits.~~is required to make certain rental payments to the sublessor. We have guaranteed ~~these third parties~~ the ~~face value~~sublessor Lamb Weston’s performance and the payment of all amounts (including indemnification obligations) owed by Lamb Weston under the ~~income tax credits over their statutory lives, through fiscal 2017,~~sublease agreement, up to a maximum of $75.0 million. We believe the farmland associated with this sublease agreement is readily marketable for lease to other area farming operators. As such, we believe that any financial exposure to the company, in the event that we were required to perform under the income tax credits are recaptured or reduced. The face value of the income tax credits was $26.7 million as of November 27, 2016. We believe the likelihood of recapture or reduction of the income tax credits is remote.guaranty, would be largely mitigated.

The obligations and commitments tables above do not include any reserves for uncertainties in income taxes, as we are unable to reasonably estimate the ultimate amount or timing of settlement of our reserves for income taxes. The liability for gross unrecognized tax benefits at November ~~27, 2016~~26, 2017 was ~~$31.7~~$34.0 million. The net amount of unrecognized tax benefits at November ~~27, 2016,~~26, 2017, that, if recognized, would impact our effective tax rate was ~~$23.5~~$25.7 million. Recognition of these tax benefits would have a favorable impact on our effective tax rate.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES

A discussion of our critical accounting estimates can be found in the "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" section in Part I, Item 7, of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May ~~29, 2016~~28, 2017. ~~There were no material changes to the previously disclosed, except for the following:~~

As was previously disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 29, 2016, in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016, in conjunction with our annual review for impairment, we performed a qualitative analysis of goodwill for the reporting units in our former Consumer Foods segment. Because forecasted sales and profits for the former International reporting unit in our former Consumer Foods segment continued to fall below our expectations relative to our previous projections throughout fiscal 2016, largely as a result of foreign exchange rates, we performed quantitative analysis of goodwill on the former International reporting unit in fiscal 2016. With the assistance of a third-party valuation specialist, we estimated the fair value of this reporting unit and determined that the fair value of the reporting unit exceeded the carrying value of the net assets of that reporting unit by 12%. As such, the results of the quantitative analysis did not result in an impairment of the former International reporting unit.

In the first quarter of fiscal 2017, in anticipation of the Spinoff, we changed our reporting segments. In accordance with applicable accounting guidance, we were required to determine new reporting units at a lower level (at the operating segment or one level lower, as applicable). When such a determination was made, we were required to perform a goodwill impairment analysis for each of the new reporting units.

We performed an assessment of impairment of goodwill for the new Canadian reporting unit within the new International reporting segment. Estimating the fair value of individual reporting units requires us to make assumptions and estimates regarding our future plans and future industry and economic conditions. We estimated the future cash flows of the Canadian reporting unit and calculated the net present value of those estimated cash flows using a risk adjusted discount rate, in order to estimate the fair value of each reporting unit from the perspective of a market participant. We used discount rates and terminal growth rates of 7.5% and 2%, respectively, to calculate the present value of estimated future cash flows. We then compared the estimated fair value of the reporting unit to the historical carrying value (including allocated assets and liabilities of certain shared and Corporate functions), and determined that the fair value of the reporting unit was less than the carrying value in the first quarter of fiscal 2017. With the assistance of a third-party valuation specialist, we estimated the fair value of the assets and liabilities of this reporting unit in order to determine the implied fair value of goodwill. We recognized an impairment charge for the difference between the implied fair value of goodwill and the carrying value of goodwill. Accordingly, during the first quarter of fiscal 2017, we recorded charges totaling $139.2 million for the impairment of goodwill.

As part of the assessment of the fair value of each asset and liability within the Canadian reporting unit, with the assistance of the third-party valuation specialist, we estimated the fair value of a Canadian brand to be less than its carrying value. Accordingly, in accordance with applicable accounting guidance, we recognized an impairment charge of $24.4 million to write-down the intangible asset to its estimated fair value.

During the second quarter of fiscal 2017, as a result of further deterioration in forecasted sales and profits primarily due to foreign exchange rates, we performed an additional assessment of impairment of goodwill for the new Mexican reporting unit. We used discount rates and terminal growth rates of 8.5% and 3%, respectively, to calculate the present value of estimated future cash flows. We then compared the estimated fair value of the reporting unit to the historical carrying value (including allocated assets and liabilities of certain shared and Corporate functions), and determined that the fair value of the reporting unit was less than the carrying value in the second quarter of fiscal 2017. With the assistance of a third-party valuation specialist, we estimated the fair value of the assets and liabilities of this reporting unit in order to determine the implied fair value of goodwill. We recognized an impairment charge for the difference between the implied fair value of goodwill and the carrying value of goodwill. Accordingly, during the second quarter of fiscal 2017, we recorded charges totaling $43.9 million for the impairment of goodwill.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

The principal market risks affecting us are exposures to price fluctuations of commodity and energy inputs, interest rates, and foreign currencies.

Other than the changes noted below, there have been no material changes in our market risk during the twenty-six weeks ended November ~~27, 2016~~26, 2017. For additional information, refer to the "Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk" in Item 7A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May ~~29, 2016.~~28, 2017.

Commodity Market Risk

We purchase commodity inputs such as wheat, corn, oats, soybean meal, soybean oil, meat, dairy products, nuts, sugar, natural gas, electricity, and packaging materials to be used in our operations. These commodities are subject to price fluctuations that may create price risk. We enter into commodity hedges to manage this price risk using physical forward contracts or derivative instruments. We have policies governing the hedging instruments our businesses may use. These policies include limiting the dollar risk exposure for each of our businesses. We also monitor the amount of associated counter-party credit risk for all non-exchange-traded transactions.

Interest Rate Risk

We may use interest rate swaps to manage the effect of interest rate changes on the fair value of our existing debt as well as the forecasted interest payments for the anticipated issuance of debt.

The carrying amount of long-term debt (including current installments) was ~~$3.4~~$3.46 billion as of November ~~27, 2016~~26, 2017. Based on current market rates, the fair value of this debt at November ~~27, 2016~~26, 2017 was estimated at ~~$3.8 billion~~.$3.80 billion. As of November ~~27, 2016~~26, 2017, a 1% increase in the interest rates would decrease the fair value of our fixed rate debt by approximately ~~$210.0~~$188.4 million, while a 1% decrease in interest rates would increase the fair value of our fixed rate debt by approximately ~~$232.8~~$208.9 million.

Foreign Currency Risk

In order to reduce exposures for our processing activities related to changes in foreign currency exchange rates, we may enter into forward exchange or option contracts for transactions denominated in a currency other than the functional currency for certain of our operations. This activity primarily relates to economically hedging against foreign currency risk in purchasing inventory and capital equipment, sales of finished goods, and future settlement of foreign denominated assets and liabilities.

Value-at-Risk (VaR)

We employ various tools to monitor our derivative risk, including value-at-risk ("VaR") models. We perform simulations using historical data to estimate potential losses in the fair value of current derivative positions. We use price and volatility information for the prior 90 days in the calculation of VaR that is used to monitor our daily risk. The purpose of this measurement is to provide a single view of the potential risk of loss associated with derivative positions at a given point in time based on recent changes in market prices. Our model uses a 95% confidence level. Accordingly, in any given one day time period, losses greater than the amounts included in the table below are expected to occur only 5% of the time. We include commodity swaps, futures, and options and foreign exchange forwards, swaps, and options in this calculation. The following table provides an overview of our average daily VaR for our energy, agriculture, and foreign exchange positions (including discontinued operations) ~~over~~during the twenty-six weeks ended November 26, 2017 and November 27, ~~2016~~ ~~and November 29, 2015.~~2016.


	Fair Value Impact				Fair Value Impact
In Millions	Average During Twenty-six Weeks Ended November 27, 2016		Average During Twenty-six Weeks Ended November 29, 2015		Average During Twenty-six Weeks Ended November 26, 2017		Average During Twenty-six Weeks Ended November 27, 2016
Energy commodities	$	0.4	$	0.9	$	0.4	$	0.4
Agriculture commodities	0.7		2.2		0.4		0.7
Foreign exchange	0.3		0.1		0.6		0.3

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The Company's management carried out an evaluation, with the participation of the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as of November ~~27, 2016~~26, 2017. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company's disclosure controls and procedures are effective.

Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

The Company's management, with the participation of the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated any change in the Company's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter covered by this report and determined that there was no change in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Part II — OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

We are a party to various environmental proceedings and litigation, primarily related to our acquisition in fiscal 1991 of Beatrice Company ("Beatrice"). As a result of the acquisition of Beatrice and the significant pre-acquisition contingencies of the Beatrice businesses and its former subsidiaries, our condensed consolidated post-acquisition financial statements reflect liabilities associated with the estimated resolution of these contingencies. Such liabilities include various litigation and environmental proceedings related to businesses divested by Beatrice prior to our acquisition of Beatrice. The litigation proceedings include suits against a number of ~~lawsuits~~lead paint and ~~claims arising out of our ongoing business operations. These included lawsuits, claims, and other proceedings related to the February 2007 recall of our peanut butter products,~~pigment manufacturers, including an investigation by the U.S. Attorney's office in Georgia and the Consumer Protection Branch of the Department of Justice into the February 2007 recall. In May 2015, we negotiated a resolution of this matter, which resulted in an executed plea agreement. On December 13, 2016, ConAgra Grocery Products Company, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company ("ConAgra Grocery Products"), ~~pleaded guilty~~and the Company as alleged successors to W. P. Fuller Co., a lead paint and pigment manufacturer owned and operated by a predecessor to Beatrice from 1962 until 1967. Although decisions favorable to us have been rendered in Rhode Island, New Jersey, Wisconsin, and Ohio, we remain a defendant in active suits in Illinois and California. The Illinois suit seeks class-wide relief for reimbursement of costs associated with the testing of lead levels in blood. In California, a number of cities and counties joined in a consolidated action seeking abatement of the alleged public nuisance. On September 23, 2013, a trial of the California case concluded in the Superior Court of California for the County of Santa Clara, and on January 27, 2014, the court entered a judgment (the "Judgment") against ConAgra Grocery Products and two other defendants ordering the creation of a California abatement fund in the amount of $1.15 billion. Liability is joint and several. The Company appealed the Judgment, and on November 14, 2017 the California Court of Appeal for the Sixth Appellate District reversed in part, holding that the defendants were not liable to pay for abatement of homes built after 1950, but affirmed the Judgment as to homes built before 1951 and remanded to the trial court with directions to recalculate the sum to be paid into the abatement fund. The Company has petitioned the California Supreme Court for further review of the decision, which the Company believes to be an unprecedented expansion of current California law. In light of the unsettled nature of California public nuisance law and the ongoing appeal, a loss is considered neither probable nor estimable, and the Company has accordingly not accrued any loss related to this case. In addition, it is not possible to estimate exposure in the remaining case in Illinois, which is based on different legal theories. If ultimately necessary, the Company will look to its insurance policies for coverage; its carriers are on notice. However, the extent of insurance coverage is uncertain, and the Company cannot assure that the final resolution of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on its financial condition, results of operations, or liquidity.

The current environmental proceedings associated with Beatrice include litigation and administrative proceedings involving Beatrice's possible status as a potentially responsible party at approximately 40 Superfund, proposed Superfund, or state-equivalent sites (the "Beatrice sites"). These sites involve locations previously owned or operated by predecessors of Beatrice that used or produced petroleum, pesticides, fertilizers, dyes, inks, solvents, PCBs, acids, lead, sulfur, tannery wastes, and/or other contaminants. In the past five years, Beatrice has paid or is in the process of paying its liability share at 31 of these sites. Reserves for these Beatrice environmental proceedings have been established based on our best estimate of the undiscounted remediation liabilities, which estimates include evaluation of investigatory studies, extent of required clean-up, the known volumetric contribution of Beatrice and other potentially responsible parties, and its experience in remediating sites. The accrual for Beatrice-related environmental matters totaled $52.8 million as of November 26, 2017, a majority of which relates to the Superfund and state-equivalent sites referenced above. During the third quarter of fiscal 2017, a final Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study was submitted for the Southwest Properties portion of the Wells G&H Superfund site, which is one of the Beatrice sites. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (the "EPA") issued a Record of Decision (the “ROD”) for the Southwest Properties portion of the site on September 29, 2017, and will subsequently enter into negotiations with potentially responsible parties to determine final responsibility for implementing the ROD.

We are party to a ~~single misdemeanor violation~~number of putative class action lawsuits challenging various product claims made in the ~~Food, Drug & Cosmetics Act. The~~Company's product labeling. These matters include Briseno v. ConAgra Foods, Inc., in which it is alleged that the labeling for Wesson^® oils as 100% natural is false and misleading because the oils contain genetically modified plants and organisms. In February 2015, the U.S. District Court for the ~~Middle~~Central District of ~~Georgia accepted the plea and imposed the agreed sentence pursuant~~California granted class certification to permit plaintiffs to pursue state law claims. The Company appealed to the ~~terms~~United States Court of Appeals for the ~~plea agreement. ConAgra Grocery Products~~Ninth Circuit, which affirmed class certification in January 2017. The United States Supreme Court declined to review the decision and the case has ~~made payments totaling $11.2 million~~been remanded to the ~~federal government, and~~trial court for further proceedings. While we cannot predict with certainty the results of this or any other legal proceeding, we do not expect this matter ~~has been concluded.~~

~~In June 2009, an accidental explosion occurred at~~to have a material adverse effect on our ~~manufacturing facility in Garner, North Carolina. This facility was the primary production facility for our Slim Jim® branded meat snacks. In June 2009, the U.S. Bureau~~financial condition, results of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives announced its determination that the explosion was the result of an accidental natural gas release, and not a deliberate act. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011, we settled our property and business interruption claims related to the Garner accident with our insurance providers. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011, Jacobs Engineering Group Inc., our engineer and project manager at the site, filed a declaratory judgment action against us seeking indemnity for personal injury claims brought against it as a result of the accident. During the first quarter of fiscal 2012, our motion for summary judgment was granted and the suit was dismissed without prejudice on the basis that the suit was filed prematurely. In the third quarter of fiscal 2014, Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. refiled its action for indemnity. On March 25, 2016, a Douglas County jury in Nebraska rendered a verdict in favor of Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. and against us in the amount of $108.9 million plus post-judgment interest. We filed our Notice of Appeal in September 2016. Although our insurance carriers have provided customary notices of reservation of their rights under the policies of insurance, we expect any ultimate exposure in this case to be limited to the applicable insurance deductible.

operations, or business.

For additional information on legal proceedings, please refer to Part I, Item 3 ~~“Legal Proceedings”~~"Legal Proceedings" and Note 17 "Contingencies" to the financial statements, in each case contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended May ~~29, 2016, Note 17 “Contingencies” to the consolidated financial statements contained therein,~~28, 2017, and Part II, Item 1 "Legal Proceedings" and Note 13 "Contingencies" to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, in each case contained in ~~this report.~~our subsequent Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

~~Our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended May 29, 2016 includes a detailed~~A discussion of ~~certain material~~our risk factors ~~we face. The information presented below restates the risk factors set forth under the heading “Risks Relating to our Proposed Spinoff of our Lamb Weston Business”~~can be found in ~~Part I,~~ Item 1A, ~~of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended May 29, 2016. You should consider these risk factors together with the other risk factors and other matters described~~Risk Factors, in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May ~~29, 2016, in this~~28, 2017, our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 27, 2017, and in our other filings with the SEC.

~~Risks Relating~~ During the second quarter of fiscal 2018, there were no material changes to our ~~Recently Completed Spinoff of Lamb Weston~~

~~We may be unable to achieve some or all of the benefits that we expect to achieve from the Spinoff.~~

~~On November 9, 2016, the Company completed the~~ previously announced Spinoff of Lamb Weston. Although we believe that separating the Lamb Weston business from the Company will provide financial, operational, managerial, and other benefits to us and our stockholders, the Spinoff may not provide such results on the scope, scale or timeline we anticipate, and we may not realize the intended benefits of the Spinoff. In addition, we incurred one-time costs in connection with the Spinoff that may negate some of the benefits we expect to achieve. If we do not realize these assumed benefits, we could suffer a material adverse effect on our financial condition. In addition, our operational and financial profile changed upon the separation of the Lamb Weston business from the Company. As a result, the diversification of our revenue sources diminished, and our results of operations, cash flows, working capital, and financing requirements may be subject to increased volatility as a result.

~~We may be exposed to claims and liabilities or incur operational difficulties as a result of the Spinoff.~~

~~The Spinoff continues to involve a number of risks, including, among other things, certain indemnification risks and~~disclosed risk associated with the provision of transitional services. In connection with the Spinoff, we entered into a separation and distribution agreement and various other agreements (including a transition services agreement, a tax matters agreement, an employee matters agreement, and a trademark license agreement), which we refer to as the Lamb Weston agreements. The Lamb Weston agreements govern the Spinoff and the relationship between the two companies going forward. They also provide for the performance of services by each company for thefactors.

~~benefit of the other for a period of time.~~

The Lamb Weston agreements provides for indemnification obligations designed to make Lamb Weston financially responsible for certain liabilities that may exist relating to its business activities, whether incurred prior to or after the distribution, including any pending or future litigation. It is possible that a court would disregard the allocation agreed to between us and Lamb Weston and require us to assume responsibility for obligations allocated to Lamb Weston. Third parties could also seek to hold us responsible for any of these liabilities or obligations, and the indemnity rights we have under the separation and distribution agreement may not be sufficient to fully cover all of these liabilities and obligations. Even if we are successful in obtaining indemnification, we may have to bear costs temporarily. In addition, our indemnity obligations to Lamb Weston may be significant. These risks could negatively affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.

In addition, certain of the Lamb Weston agreements provide for the performance of services by each company for the benefit of the other for a period of time. As such, there is continued risk that management’s and our employees’ attention will be significantly diverted by the provision of transitional services. The Lamb Weston agreements could also lead to disputes over rights to certain shared property and rights and over the allocation of costs and revenues for products and operations. If Lamb Weston is unable to satisfy its obligations under these agreements, including its indemnification obligations, we could incur losses. Our inability to effectively manage separation activities and related events could adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.

~~The Spinoff could result in substantial tax liability.~~

The Spinoff is intended to qualify for tax-free treatment to the Company and its stockholders under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, which we refer to as the Code. Completion of the Spinoff was conditioned upon, among other things, our receipt of an opinion from our tax advisors that the distribution of shares of Lamb Weston in the Spinoff will qualify as tax-free to Lamb Weston, the Company, and our stockholders for U.S. federal income tax purposes under Sections 355 and 368(a)(1)(D) and related provisions of the Code. The opinion relied on, among other things, various assumptions and representations as to factual matters made by the Company and Lamb Weston. If such assumptions or representations are inaccurate or incomplete in any material respect, the conclusions reached by such advisor in its opinion could be jeopardized. The opinion is not binding on the Internal Revenue Service, which we refer to as the IRS, or the courts, and there can be no assurance that the IRS or the courts will not challenge the qualification of the Spinoff as a transaction under Sections 355 and 368(a) of the Code or that any such challenge would not prevail.

If the Spinoff is determined to be taxable, the Company and its stockholders could incur significant tax liabilities, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition, or results of operations.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

The following table presents the total number of shares of common stock purchased during the second quarter of fiscal ~~2017,~~2018, the average price paid per share, the number of shares that were purchased as part of a publicly announced repurchase program, and the approximate dollar value of the maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the share repurchase program:

Period
Total Number
of Shares (or
units)
Purchased

Average
Price Paid
per Share
(or unit)

Total Number of
Shares
Purchased as Part of
Publicly Announced
Plans or Programs
(1)

Approximate Dollar
Value of Maximum
Number of Shares that
may yet be Purchased
under the Program (1)
August 29 through September 25, 2016 130,749
$ 46.44
130,749
$ 31,967,000
September 26 through October 23, 2016 —
—
—
1,281,967,000
October 24 through November 27, 2016 2,935,980
36.65
2,935,980
1,174,351,000
Total Fiscal 2017 Second Quarter Activity 3,066,729
37.07
3,066,729
1,174,351,000



Period	Total Number of Shares (or units) Purchased	Average Price Paid per Share (or unit)		Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs (1)	Approximate Dollar Value of Maximum Number of Shares that may yet be Purchased under the Program (1)
August 28 through September 24, 2017	—	$	—	—	$	1,081,967,000
September 25 through October 22, 2017	2,278,142	$	34.16	2,278,142	$	1,004,155,000
October 23 through November 26, 2017	5,904,526	$	34.24	5,904,526	$	801,968,000
Total Fiscal 2018 Second Quarter Activity	8,182,668	$	34.22	8,182,668	$	801,968,000

________________

(1)

Pursuant to publicly announced share repurchase programs from December 2003, we have repurchased approximately ~~173.2~~210.1 million shares at a cost of ~~$4.4~~$5.75 billion through November ~~27, 2016.~~26, 2017. On ~~December 14, 2011, we announced that our Board of Directors approved a $750.0 million increase to our share repurchase authorization, and on~~ October 11, 2016, we announced that our Board of Directors approved an increase of $1.25 billion to the share repurchase program. On June 29, 2017, we announced that in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017, our Board of Directors approved a further increase of ~~$1.25 billion. This authorization was contingent on~~$1.0 billion to the ~~completion of the Spinoff.~~share repurchase program. The ~~increased~~ share repurchase program is effective and has no expiration date.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

All ~~exhibits are set forth on~~documents referenced below were filed pursuant to the ~~Exhibit Index, which is incorporated herein~~Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by ~~reference.~~Conagra Brands, Inc. (file number 001-07275), unless otherwise noted.



EXHIBIT		DESCRIPTION

3.1		Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Conagra Brands, Inc., incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on November 10, 2016

3.2		Amended and Restated By-Laws of Conagra Brands, Inc., incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 23, 2017

4.2		Indenture, dated October 12, 2017, by and between the Company and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Trustee, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on October 12, 2017

4.3		First Supplemental Indenture, dated October 12, 2017, by and between the Company and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Trustee (including Form of Note), incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on October 12, 2017

*10.2.4		Amendment Four to Conagra Brands, Inc. Nonqualified Pension Plan (January 1, 2009 Restatement), dated December 19, 2017

*10.4.7		Conagra Brands, Inc. Voluntary Deferred Compensation Plan (Restated Effective January 1, 2017), dated October 2, 2017, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4.7 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 27, 2017

*10.4.8		First Amendment to Conagra Brands, Inc. Voluntary Deferred Compensation Plan (Restated Effective January 1, 2017), dated December 21, 2017

*10.7.7		First Amendment to ConAgra Foods, Inc. 2014 Stock Plan, dated December 15, 2017, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 15, 2017

10.31.1		Extension of Transition Services Agreement, dated as of October 9, 2017, by and between the Company and Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.

12		Statement regarding computation of ratio of earnings to fixed charges

31.1		Section 302 Certificate of Chief Executive Officer

31.2		Section 302 Certificate of Chief Financial Officer

32.1		Section 906 Certificates

101		The following materials from Conagra Brands' Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended November 26, 2017, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Earnings, (ii) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, (iii) the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, (iv) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, (v) Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, and (vi) document and entity information.

* Management contract or compensatory plan.

Pursuant to Item 601(b)(4) of Regulation S-K, certain instruments with respect to long-term debt of Conagra Brands, Inc. are not filed with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. The Company will furnish a copy of any such long-term debt agreement to the SEC upon request.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.



	CONAGRA BRANDS, INC.

	By:	/s/ DAVID S. MARBERGER
		David S. Marberger
		Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

	By:	/s/ ROBERT G. WISE
		Robert G. Wise
		Senior Vice President and Corporate Controller

Dated this 4th day of January, ~~2017.~~

~~EXHIBIT INDEX~~



~~EXHIBIT~~		~~DESCRIPTION~~

2.1*		Separation and Distribution Agreement, dated as of November 8, 2016, by and between Conagra Brands, Inc. (formerly known as ConAgra Foods, Inc.) and Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc., incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on November 10, 2016

~~3.1~~		Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Conagra Brands, Inc., incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on November 10, 2016

~~3.2~~		~~Amended and Restated Bylaws of Conagra Brands, Inc., as amended, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on October 1, 2015~~

~~10.1~~		Transition and Non-Competition Agreement, dated August 29, 2016, by and between Conagra Brands, Inc. and John F. Gehring, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 2, 2016

~~10.2~~		~~Interim Position and Non-Compete Agreement, dated as of September 28, 2016, by and between Conagra Brands, Inc. and John Gehring~~

~~10.3~~		Tax Matters Agreement, dated as of November 8, 2016, by and between Conagra Brands, Inc. and Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc., incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on November 10, 2016

~~10.4~~		Employee Matters Agreement, dated as of November 8, 2016, by and between Conagra Brands, Inc. and Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc., incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on November 10, 2016

~~10.5~~		Transition Services Agreement, dated as of November 8, 2016, by and between Conagra Brands, Inc. and Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc., incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on November 10, 2016

~~10.6~~		Trademark License Agreement, dated as of November 8, 2016, by and between Conagra Brands, Inc. and Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc., incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on November 10, 2016

12		~~Statement regarding computation of ratio of earnings to fixed charges~~

~~31.1~~		~~Section 302 Certificate of Chief Executive Officer~~

~~31.2~~		~~Section 302 Certificate of Chief Financial Officer~~

~~32.1~~		~~Section 906 Certificates~~

~~101.1~~		The following materials from the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended November 27, 2016, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations, (ii) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss), (iii) the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, (iv) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, (v) Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, and (vi) document and entity information.

Pursuant to Item 601(b)(4) of Regulation S-K, certain instruments with respect to long-term debt of Conagra Brands, Inc. are not filed with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. The Company will furnish a copy of any such long-term debt agreement to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.

* Certain exhibits and schedules have been omitted and the Company agrees to furnish supplementally to the SEC a copy of any omitted exhibits and schedules upon request.

2018.

4445



	May 29, 2016
Spicetec:
Current assets	$	43.3
Noncurrent assets (including goodwill of $104.7 million)	148.3
Current liabilities	10.3
Noncurrent liabilities	1.2
JM Swank:
Current assets	$	73.7
Noncurrent assets (including goodwill of $53.8 million)	74.3
Current liabilities	44.3
Noncurrent liabilities	0.4



	Balance at May 29, 2016		Costs Incurred and Charged to Expense		Costs Paid or Otherwise Settled			Changes in Estimates			Balance at November 27, 2016
Multi-employer pension costs	$	40.7	$	—	$	(10.9	)	$	—		$	29.8
Severance	47.2		6.5		(31.3		)	(1.7		)	20.7
Consulting	4.7		0.3		(4.6		)	—			0.4
Contract termination	6.3		11.4		(2.2		)	(1.3		)	14.2
Other costs	0.5		8.5		(7.9		)	—			1.1
Total	$	99.4	$	26.7	$	(56.9	)	$	(3.0	)	$	66.2