Table of Contents

     
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
__________________________________________________ 
FORM 10-Q 
 __________________________________________________ 
 
xQUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended July 29, 2017May 5, 2018
OR
¨TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Commission file number: 001-35535 
__________________________________________________ 
TILLY’S, INC.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter) 
__________________________________________________ 
 
Delaware 45-2164791
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
 
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
10 Whatney
Irvine, CA 92618
(Address of principal executive offices)
(949) 609-5599
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
 __________________________________________________ 
 
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x No  ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  x    No  ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” ,filer,” “smaller reporting company”company,” or an “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
 
Large accelerated filer 
¨

  Accelerated filer 
x



    
Non-accelerated filer 
¨  (do not check if a smaller reporting company)
  Smaller reporting company ¨
       
Emerging growth company 
x


¨
    
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.  ¨    
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2)    Yes  ¨    No  x
As of August 25, 2017June 8, 2018 the registrant had the following shares of common stock outstanding:
Class A common stock $0.001 par value13,874,41915,392,584
Class B common stock $0.001 par value14,948,49713,848,497
     

TILLY’S, INC.
FORM 10-Q
For the Quarterly Period Ended July 29, 2017May 5, 2018
Index
 
  Page
 
Item 1.
 
 
 
 
 

 
   
Item 2.
   
Item 3.
   
Item 4.
  
 
   
Item 1.
   
Item 1A.
Item 5.
   
Item 6.
   
 



3

Table of Contents

Part I. Financial Information
 
Item 1. Financial Statements (Unaudited)
TILLY’S, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except par value)
(Unaudited)
 
July 29,
2017
 January 28,
2017
 July 30,
2016
May 5,
2018
 February 3,
2018
 April 29,
2017
ASSETS          
Current assets:          
Cash and cash equivalents$43,567
 $78,994
 $56,466
$41,190
 $53,202
 $52,813
Marketable securities66,064
 54,923
 39,926
63,799
 82,750
 52,833
Receivables6,829
 3,989
 8,940
4,955
 4,352
 4,737
Merchandise inventories75,033
 47,768
 76,820
56,837
 53,216
 55,437
Prepaid expenses and other current assets9,391
 9,541
 11,131
9,266
 9,534
 8,513
Total current assets200,884
 195,215
 193,283
176,047
 203,054
 174,333
Property and equipment, net89,130
 89,219
 97,424
80,542
 83,321
 87,823
Other assets6,843
 6,072
 5,258
3,277
 3,736
 6,207
Total assets$296,857
 $290,506
 $295,965
$259,866
 $290,111
 $268,363
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY          
Current liabilities:          
Accounts payable$41,729
 $17,584
 $41,408
$19,504
 $21,615
 $22,842
Accrued expenses29,097
 23,872
 21,269
23,713
 22,731
 21,404
Deferred revenue9,277
 10,203
 7,390
7,622
 10,879
 9,114
Accrued compensation and benefits7,834
 7,259
 6,755
6,614
 6,119
 4,728
Dividends payable
 29,067
 
Current portion of deferred rent5,836
 5,643
 6,237
5,322
 5,220
 5,834
Capital lease obligation386
 835
 885

 
 612
Total current liabilities94,159
 65,396
 83,944
62,775
 95,631
 64,534
Long-term portion of deferred rent33,080
 35,890
 38,365
30,857
 31,340
 34,356
Long-term portion of capital lease obligation
 
 386
Other2,476
 2,715
 
Total liabilities127,239
 101,286
 122,695
96,108
 129,686
 98,890
Commitments and contingencies (Note 5)
 
 

 
 
Stockholders’ equity:          
Common stock (Class A), $0.001 par value; July 29, 2017 - 100,000 shares authorized, 13,864 shares issued and outstanding; January 28, 2017 - 100,000 shares authorized, 13,434 shares issued and outstanding; July 30, 2016 - 100,000 shares authorized, 12,479 shares issued and outstanding14
 14
 12
Common stock (Class B), $0.001 par value; July 29, 2017 - 35,000 shares authorized, 14.958 shares issued and outstanding; January 28, 2017 - 35,000 shares authorized, 15,329 shares issued and outstanding; July 30, 2016 - 35,000 shares authorized, 16,069 shares issued and outstanding15
 15
 16
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value; July 29, 2017, January 28, 2017 and July 30, 2016 - 10,000 shares authorized, no shares issued or outstanding
 
 
Common stock (Class A), $0.001 par value; 100,000 shares authorized; 15,197, 14,927 and 13,678 shares issued and outstanding, respectively15
 15
 14
Common stock (Class B), $0.001 par value; 35,000 shares authorized; 13,948, 14,188 and 15,109 shares issued and outstanding, respectively14
 14
 15
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value; 10,000 shares authorized; no shares issued or outstanding
 
 
Additional paid-in capital139,479
 138,102
 134,910
144,550
 143,984
 138,797
Retained earnings30,008
 51,023
 38,301
19,068
 16,398
 30,604
Accumulated other comprehensive income102
 66
 31
111
 14
 43
Total stockholders’ equity169,618
 189,220
 173,270
163,758
 160,425
 169,473
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity$296,857
 $290,506
 $295,965
$259,866
 $290,111
 $268,363
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


4

Table of Contents

TILLY’S, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF (LOSS) INCOMEOPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)
 
Three Months Ended Six Months EndedThree Months Ended
July 29,
2017
 July 30,
2016
 July 29,
2017
 July 30,
2016
May 5,
2018
 April 29,
2017
Net sales$138,810
 $136,412
 $259,757
 $256,630
$123,634
 $120,947
Cost of goods sold (includes buying, distribution, and occupancy costs)97,881
 97,575
 185,923
 185,206
88,657
 88,042
Gross profit40,929
 38,837
 73,834
 71,424
34,977
 32,905
Selling, general and administrative expenses42,168
 36,605
 75,402
 73,159
33,646
 33,234
Operating (loss) income(1,239) 2,232
 (1,568) (1,735)
Operating income (loss)1,331
 (329)
Other income, net197
 91
 435
 167
383
 238
(Loss) Income before income taxes(1,042) 2,323
 (1,133) (1,568)
Income tax (benefit) expense(446) 890
 (376) (256)
Net (loss) income$(596) $1,433
 $(757) $(1,312)
Basic (loss) income per share of Class A and Class B common stock$(0.02) $0.05
 $(0.03) $(0.05)
Diluted (loss) income per share of Class A and Class B common stock$(0.02) $0.05
 $(0.03) $(0.05)
Income (loss) before income taxes1,714
 (91)
Income tax expense491
 70
Net income (loss)$1,223
 $(161)
Basic income (loss) per share of Class A and Class B common stock$0.04
 $(0.01)
Diluted income (loss) per share of Class A and Class B common stock$0.04
 $(0.01)
Weighted average basic shares outstanding28,751
 28,462
 28,728
 28,443
29,080
 28,705
Weighted average diluted shares outstanding28,751
 28,466
 28,728
 28,443
29,438
 28,705
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


5

Table of Contents

TILLY’S, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) INCOME
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
 
 Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
 July 29,
2017
 July 30,
2016
 July 29,
2017
 July 30, 2016
Net (loss) income$(596) $1,433
 $(757) $(1,312)
Other comprehensive income:       
Net change in unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities, net of tax59
 19
 36
 9
Other comprehensive income59
 19
 36
 9
Comprehensive (loss) income$(537) $1,452
 $(721) $(1,303)
 Three Months Ended
 May 5,
2018
 April 29, 2017
Net income (loss)$1,223
 $(161)
Other comprehensive income (loss):   
Net change in unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities, net of tax97
 (23)
Other comprehensive income (loss)97
 (23)
Comprehensive income (loss)$1,320
 $(184)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


6

Table of Contents

TILLY’S, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
 
Number of Shares          Number of Shares          
Common
Stock
(Class A)
 
Common
Stock
(Class B)
 
Common
Stock
 
Additional
Paid-in
Capital
 
Retained
Earnings
 
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income
 
Total
Stockholders’
Equity
Common
Stock
(Class A)
 
Common
Stock
(Class B)
 
Common
Stock
 
Additional
Paid-in
Capital
 
Retained
Earnings
 
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income
 
Total
Stockholders’
Equity
Balance at January 28, 201713,434
 15,329
 $29
 $138,102
 $51,023
 $66
 $189,220
Cumulative-effect adjustment from adoption of ASU 2016-09 (Note 2)
 
 
 178
 (178) 
 
Net loss
 
 
 
 (757) 
 (757)
Dividends paid
 
 
 
 (20,080) 
 (20,080)
Balance at February 3, 201814,927
 14,188
 $29
 $143,984
 $16,398
 $14
 $160,425
Cumulative-effect adjustment from adoption of ASC 606 (Note 2)
 
 
 
 1,447
 
 1,447
Net income
 
 
 
 1,223
 
 1,223
Restricted stock vesting44
 
 
 
 
 
 
28
 
 
 
 
 
 
Taxes paid in lieu of shares issued
 
 
 (101) 
 
 (101)(9) 
 
 (99) 
 
 (99)
Shares converted by founders371
 (371) 
 
 
 
 
240
 (240) 
 
 
 
 
Stock-based compensation expense
 
 
 1,195
 
 
 1,195

 
 
 580
 
 
 580
Employee exercises of stock options15
 
 
 105
 
 
 105
11
 
 
 85
 
 
 85
Change in unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities
 
 
 
 
 36
 36

 
 
 
 
 97
 97
Balance at July 29, 201713,864
 14,958
 $29
 $139,479
 $30,008
 $102
 $169,618
Balance at May 5, 201815,197
 13,948
 $29
 $144,550
 $19,068
 $111
 $163,758
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


7

Table of Contents

TILLY’S, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
Six Months EndedThree Months Ended
July 29,
2017
 July 30,
2016
May 5,
2018
 April 29,
2017
Cash flows from operating activities      
Net loss$(757) $(1,312)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities:   
Net income (loss)$1,223
 $(161)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:   
Depreciation and amortization11,904
 11,650
5,815
 5,829
Stock-based compensation expense1,195
 1,459
580
 577
Impairment of assets451
 1,523
145
 
Loss (Gain) on disposal of assets16
 (16)
Loss on disposal of assets
 4
Gain on sales and maturities of marketable securities(266) (106)(265) (152)
Deferred income taxes(364) (226)(87) (141)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:      
Receivables(2,840) (3,543)(603) (748)
Merchandise inventories(27,265) (25,463)(3,811) (7,669)
Prepaid expenses and other assets(280) (2,150)246
 1,049
Accounts payable24,116
 25,100
(1,710) 5,143
Accrued expenses(74) 1,946
107
 (3,807)
Accrued compensation and benefits575
 1,004
495
 (2,531)
Deferred rent(2,617) (2,395)(381) (1,343)
Deferred revenue(926) (1,259)(1,084) (1,089)
Net cash provided by operating activities2,868
 6,212
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities670
 (5,039)
Cash flows from investing activities      
Purchase of property and equipment(6,954) (10,415)(2,946) (2,983)
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment
 43
Purchases of marketable securities(62,898) (39,873)(21,052) (29,818)
Maturities of marketable securities52,082
 50,000
40,397
 32,022
Net cash used in investing activities(17,770) (245)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities16,399
 (779)
Cash flows from financing activities      
Dividends paid(20,080) 
(29,067) (20,080)
Proceeds from exercise of stock options105
 
85
 29
Taxes paid in lieu of shares issued for stock-based compensation(99) (89)
Payment of capital lease obligation(449) (422)
 (223)
Taxes paid in lieu of shares issued for stock-based compensation(101) (99)
Net cash used in financing activities(20,525) (521)(29,081) (20,363)
Change in cash and cash equivalents(35,427) 5,446
(12,012) (26,181)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period78,994
 51,020
53,202
 78,994
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period$43,567
 $56,466
$41,190
 $52,813
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information      
Interest paid$20
 $48
$
 $12
Income taxes paid$4,606
 $3,520
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash activities      
Unpaid purchases of property and equipment$5,328
 $1,183
$235
 $2,094
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


8

Table of Contents


TILLY’S, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note 1: Description of the Company and Basis of Presentation
Tillys is a leading destination youth culture specialty retailer of casual apparel, footwear and accessories for young men, young women, boys and girls with an unparalleled selectionextensive assortment of the most sought-aftericonic global, emerging, and proprietary brands rooted in the action sports, team sports, music, art, and fashion influences inherent in thean active and outdoor West Coastsocial lifestyle. Tillys is headquartered in Irvine, California and we operated 221222 stores, including three RSQ-branded pop-up stores, in 31 states as of July 29, 2017.May 5, 2018. Our stores are located in malls, lifestyle centers, ‘power’ centers, community centers, outlet centers and street-front locations. Customers may also shop online, where we feature the same assortment of products as carried in our brick-and-mortar stores, supplemented by additional online onlyonline-only styles. Our goal is to serve as a destination for the latest, most relevant merchandise and brands important to our customers.
The Tillys concept began in 1982, when our co-founders, Hezy Shaked and Tilly Levine, opened their first store in Orange County, California. Since 1984 the business has been conducted through World of Jeans & Tops, a California corporation, ("WOJT")or “WOJT”, which operates under the name “Tillys”. In May 2011, Tilly’s, Inc., a Delaware corporation, was formed solely for the purpose of reorganizing the corporate structure of WOJT in preparation for an initial public offering. As part of the initial public offering in May 2012, WOJT became a wholly owned subsidiary of Tilly’s,Tilly's, Inc.

As used in these Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, except where the context otherwise requires or where otherwise indicated, the terms "the Company", "World of Jeans and Tops", "WOJT", "we", "our", "us" and "Tillys" refer to WOJT before our initial public offering, and to Tilly's, Inc. and its subsidiary after our initial public offering.
We have prepared the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP"), for interim financial reporting. These consolidated financial statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"). Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been omitted from this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q as is permitted by SEC rules and regulations.

In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements contain all normal and recurring adjustments necessary to present fairly the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods presented. The results of operations for the secondfirst quarters ended May 5, 2018 and first halves ended JulyApril 29, 2017 and July 30, 2016, respectively, are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for the full fiscal year. These interimThe accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 28, 2017February 3, 2018 ("fiscal 2016"2017").

We have reclassified certain prior period balance sheet amounts within our consolidated balance sheets to conform to our current period presentation.
Fiscal Periods
Our fiscal year ends on the Saturday closest to January 31. References to fiscal 20172018 refer to the fiscal year ending February 3, 2018.2, 2019. References to the fiscal quarters or halves ended JulyMay 5, 2018, and April 29, 2017, and July 30, 2016, refer to the three and six monthsfirst quarter ended respectively, as of those dates.
Note 2: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Information regarding our significant accounting policies is contained in Note 2, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies”, of the consolidated financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 28, 2017.February 3, 2018.
Recently Adopted Accounting Standard
On January 29, 2017,February 4, 2018, we adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board (the "FASB") Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2016-09,2014-09, Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment AccountingRevenue from Contracts with Customers , which simplifies the accounting and reporting for share-based compensation, including the accounting for income taxes, forfeitures and statutory tax withholding requirements, as well as the classification in the statement of cash flows. We elected to account for forfeitures as they occur, rather than estimate expected forfeitures. The adoption of ASU 2016-09 resulted in a cumulative-effect adjustment of $0.2 million decrease to retained earnings and a $0.2 million increase to additional paid-in-capital as of January 29, 2017, related to the recognition of previously estimated expected forfeitures("ASC 606") using the modified retrospective method. We adoptedtransition method, which under ASC 606, means the cash flow presentation which requires excess tax benefitsstandard applies retrospectively with the cumulative effect recognized in the opening retained earnings balance in fiscal 2018. Comparative information for the prior year fiscal quarter has not been adjusted and continues to be presented asreported under the previous standard ASC 605. Under ASC 606, revenue is recognized when control of promised goods or services is transferred to our customers at an operating activity rather than a financing activity.amount we expect to be entitled to in exchange for those goods or services. The adoption of this update did not have an effect on our consolidated resultsstandard requires us to recognize gift card breakage income in proportion to redemptions as they occur. The new guidance also requires enhanced disclosures, such as disaggregation of operations.revenues and revenue recognition policies that require significant judgment and identification of performance obligations to customers.


9

Table of Contents

The adoption of ASC 606 resulted in a net cumulative effect adjustment that increased the opening balance of retained earnings by approximately $1.4 million, as well as the following impacts:
Breakage revenue is now recognized over time in proportion to actual customer redemptions. Breakage revenue was previously recognized two full fiscal years after the gift cards were activated when the probability of redemption was considered remote.
Revenue for merchandise shipped to the customer from a distribution center or store is now recognized at the shipping point, whereas it was previously recognized upon customer receipt.
The impact of the adoption of ASC 606 on the consolidated balance sheet as of May 5, 2018 was as follows (in thousands):
 As reported Balances without adoption of ASC 606 
Effect of Adoption
Increase (Decrease)
Merchandise inventories$56,837
 $57,266
 $(429)
Other assets3,277
 3,813
 (536)
Accrued expenses23,713
 23,620
 93
Deferred revenue7,622
 10,387
 (2,765)
Retained earnings19,068
 17,361
 1,707

The impact of the adoption of ASC 606 on our consolidated statement of operations for the three months ended May 5, 2018 was as follows (in thousands):
 As reported Balances without adoption of ASC 606 
Effect of Adoption
Increase (Decrease)
Net sales$123,634
 $123,042
 $592
Cost of goods sold88,657
 88,418
 239
Gross profit34,977
 34,624
 353

Revenue Recognition
Revenue is recognized for store sales when the customer receives and pays for the merchandise at the register, net of estimated returns. Taxes collected from our customers are recorded on a net basis. For e-commerce sales, we recognize revenue, net of sales taxes and estimated sales returns, and the related cost of goods sold at the time the merchandise is shipped to the customer. Amounts related to shipping and handling that are billed to customers are reflected in net sales, and the related costs are reflected in cost of goods sold in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations.
The following table summarizes net sales from our retail stores compared to e-commerce (in thousands):
 Three Months Ended
 May 5,
2018
 April 29,
2017
Retail stores$108,501
 $104,695
E-commerce15,133
 16,252
Total net sales$123,634
 $120,947
We accrue for estimated sales returns by customers based on historical sales return results. As of May 5, 2018, February 3, 2018 and April 29, 2017, our reserve for sales returns was $1.6 million, $1.1 million and $1.4 million, respectively.


10

Table of Contents

We recognize revenue from gift cards as they are redeemed for merchandise. Prior to redemption, we maintain a current liability for unredeemed gift card balances. The customer liability balance was $6.3 million, $9.2 million and $6.3 million as of May 5, 2018, February 3, 2018 and April 29, 2017, respectively, and is included in deferred revenue on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. Our gift cards do not have expiration dates and in most cases there is no legal obligation to remit unredeemed gift cards to relevant jurisdictions. Based on actual historical redemption patterns, we determined that a small percentage of gift cards are unlikely to be redeemed (which we refer to as gift card “breakage”). Based on our historical gift card breakage rate, we recognize breakage revenue over the redemption period in proportion to actual gift card redemptions. Revenue recognized from gift cards was $3.7 million and $4.3 million for the first quarters ended May 5, 2018 and April 29, 2017, respectively.
We have a customer loyalty program where customers accumulate points based on purchase activity. Once a loyalty member achieves a certain point level, the member earns awards that may be redeemed for merchandise. Unredeemed awards and accumulated partial points are accrued as deferred revenue and awards redeemed by the member for merchandise are recorded as an increase to net sales. We expire unredeemed awards after 45 days from date of issuance and accumulated partial points 365 days after the last purchase activity. A liability is estimated based on the standalone selling price of awards and partial points earned and estimated redemptions. The deferred revenue for this program was $1.3 million, $1.2 million and $0.7 million as of May 5, 2018, February 3, 2018 and April 29, 2017, respectively. Revenue recognized from our loyalty program was $0.3 million and $0.1 million for the first quarters ended May 5, 2018 and April 29, 2017, respectively.
Income taxes
The Securities and Exchange Commission has issued interpretive guidance under Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118 ("SAB 118") that allows for a measurement period up to one year after the enactment date of the Tax Act to finalize the recording of the related tax impacts. We have not made any provision adjustments during the first quarter ended May 5, 2018. We are continuing to assess the final impact of the guidance which we expect to complete within the one-year time frame provided by SAB 118.

New Accounting Standards Not Yet Adopted
In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the "FASB") issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASU 2014-09”), along with amendments issued in 2015 and 2016, which amends the existing accounting standards for revenue recognition. ASU 2014-09 outlines principles that govern revenue recognition at an amount an entity expects to be entitled when products are transferred to customers. ASU 2014-09, which will become effective for us in the first quarter of fiscal 2018, may be applied retrospectively for each period presented (the "full retrospective method") or retrospectively with the cumulative effect recognized in the opening retained earnings balance in fiscal year 2018 (the "modified retrospective method"). We currently anticipate adopting the standard using the modified retrospective method. We are in the process of evaluating the overall impact of adopting the new standard on our consolidated financial statements. Based on our preliminary assessment, we have determined that the adoption will change the timing of recognition of gift card breakage income, which is currently recognized under the remote method and recorded in net sales. The new guidance will require recognition of gift card breakage income proportionately in net sales as redemptions occur. The new guidance also requires enhanced disclosures, such as revenue recognition policies that require significant judgment and identification of performance obligations to customers. We currently do not expect the adoption of this update to have a material effect on our consolidated results of operations.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Accounting Standards Codification 842). The new standard requires lessees to apply a dual approach, classifying leases as either finance or operating leases based on the principle of whether or not the lease is effectively a financed purchase by the lessee. This classification will determine whether lease expense is recognized based on an effective interest method or on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. A lessee is also required to record a right-of-use asset and a lease liability for all leases with a term of greater than 12 months regardless of their classification. Leases with a term of 12 months or less will be accounted for similar to existing guidance for operating leases. ASU 2016-02, which will become effective for us in the first quarter of fiscal 2019, with early adoption permitted, must be adopted using the modified retrospective method. The new standard is expected to impact our consolidated financial statements as we conduct all of our retail sales and corporate operations in leased facilities. We are in the process of evaluating the impact of adopting the new standard on our consolidated financial statements.
Note 3: Marketable Securities
Marketable securities as of July 29, 2017May 5, 2018 consisted of commercial paper, classified as available-for-sale, and fixed income securities, are classified as held-to-maturity.held-to-maturity as we have the intent and ability to hold them to maturity. Our investments in commercial paper and fixed income securities are recorded at fair value and amortized cost, which approximates fair value, respectively. All of our marketable securities are less than one year from maturity.


11

Table of Contents

The following table summarizes our investments in marketable securities at JulyMay 5, 2018, February 3, 2018 and April 29, 2017 January 28, 2017 and July 30, 2016 (in thousands):
 July 29, 2017
 
Cost or
Amortized Cost
 
Gross Unrealized
Holding Gains
 
Estimated
Fair Value
Commercial paper$44,713
 $170
 $44,883
Fixed income securities21,181
 
 21,181
 $65,894
 $170
 $66,064
      
 January 28, 2017
 Cost or
Amortized Cost
 
Gross Unrealized
Holding Gains
 Estimated
Fair Value
Commercial paper$44,785
 $107
 $44,892
Fixed income securities10,031
 
 10,031
 $54,816
 $107
 $54,923
      
 July 30, 2016
 Cost or
Amortized Cost
 Gross Unrealized
Holding Gains
 Estimated
Fair Value
Commercial paper$39,874
 $52
 $39,926


10

Table of Contents

 May 5, 2018
 
Cost or
Amortized Cost
 
Gross Unrealized
Holding Gains
 
Estimated
Fair Value
Commercial paper$49,548
 $152
 $49,700
Fixed income securities14,099
 
 14,099
 $63,647
 $152
 $63,799
      
 February 3, 2018
 Cost or
Amortized Cost
 
Gross Unrealized
Holding Gains
 Estimated
Fair Value
Commercial paper$59,566
 $23
 $59,589
Fixed income securities23,119
 42
 23,161
 $82,685
 $65
 $82,750
      
 April 29, 2017
 Cost or
Amortized Cost
 Gross Unrealized
Holding Gains
 Estimated
Fair Value
Commercial paper$44,735
 $72
 $44,807
Fixed income securities8,000
 26
 8,026
 $52,735
 $98
 $52,833
We recognized gains on investments for commercial paper that matured during the second quarterthree months ended May 5, 2018 and first half ended JulyApril 29, 2017. Upon recognition of the gains, we reclassified these amounts out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) and into “Other income, net” on the Consolidated Statements of (Loss) Income.Operations.
The following table summarizes our gains on investments for commercial paper (in thousands):
 Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
 July 29,
2017
 July 30,
2016
 July 29,
2017
 July 30,
2016
Gains on investments$83
 $55
 $215
 $106
 Three Months Ended
 May 5,
2018
 April 29,
2017
Gains on investments$195
 $152

Note 4: Line of Credit

Our amended and restated credit agreement with Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (the "Bank") provides for a $25.0 million revolving line of credit with a maturity date of June 26, 2020. The interest rate charged on borrowings is selected at our discretion at the time of draw between the London Interbank Offered Rate, plus 0.75%, or at the Bank’s prime rate. The agreement allows for the declaration and payment of dividends or distributions to stockholders.stockholders, subject to certain limitations. On January 31,February 20, 2018 and February 24, 2017, our Board of Directors declaredwe paid a special cash dividend of $1.00 per share and $0.70 per share, respectively, to all holders of record of issued and outstanding shares of both our Class A and Class B common stock as of the close of business on February 15, 2017. Payment of the dividend was made on February 24, 2017.stock. The line of credit is secured by substantially all of our assets. As a sub-feature under the credit agreement, the Bank may also issue stand-by and/or commercial letters of credit up to $15.0 million.

We are required to maintain certain financial and non-financial covenants in accordance with the line of credit. The financial covenants require certain levels of leverage and profitability, such as (i) income before income taxes not to be less than $1.0 million (calculated at the end of each fiscal quarter on a trailing 12-month basis), (ii) a maximum ratio of 4.00 to 1.00 as of each quarter end for “Funded Debt to EBITDAR”, defined as the sum of total debt, capital leases and annual rent expense multiplied by six divided by the sum of net income, interest expense, taxes, depreciation, amortization and annual rent expense on a trailing 12-month basis, and (iii) requires minimum eligible inventory, cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities totaling $50.0 million as of the end of each quarter. In addition, maximum investment in fixed assets in any fiscal year of $50.0 million.
In September 2016, we established a $750,000 standby letter of credit as security against insurance claims as required by our workers compensation insurance policy.  There has been no activity under this letter of credit since its inception.


12

Table of Contents

As of July 29, 2017,May 5, 2018, we were in compliance with all of our covenants and had no outstanding borrowings under the revolving credit facility.
Note 5: Commitments and Contingencies

From time to time, we may become involved in lawsuits and other claims arising from our ordinary course of business. We have established loss provisions of approximately $6.9$6.3 million for matters in which losses are probable and can be reasonably estimated. For some matters, we are currently unable to predict the ultimate outcome, determine whether a liability has been incurred or make an estimate of the reasonably possible liability that could result from an unfavorable outcome because of the uncertainties related to the incurrence, amount and range of loss on any pending litigation or claim. Because of the unpredictable nature of these matters, we cannot provide any assurances regarding the outcome of any litigation or claim to which we are a party or that the ultimate outcome of any of the matters threatened or pending against us, including those disclosed below, will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Juan Carlos Gonzales, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, v. Tilly’s Inc. et al, Superior Court of California, County of Orange, Case No. 30-2017-00948710-CU-OE-CXC.  In October 2017, the plaintiff filed a putative class action against us, alleging various violations of California’s wage and hour laws.  The complaint seeks class certification, unspecified damages, unpaid wages, penalties, restitution, interest, and attorneys’ fees and costs. In December 2017, we filed an answer to the complaint, denying all of the claims and asserting various defenses. In April 2018, the plaintiff filed a separate action under the Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) against us seeking penalties on behalf of himself and other similarly situated employees for the same alleged violations of California's wage and hour laws.  We have requested the plaintiff to dismiss the class action claims based on an existing class action waiver in an arbitration agreement which plaintiff signed with our co-defendant, BaronHR, the staffing company that employed plaintiff to work at the Company. If plaintiff refuses to dismiss the class claims from the class action, we will seek to enforce the class action waiver. We intend to defend this case vigorously.
Lauren Minniti, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, v. Tilly’s, Inc., United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, Case No. 0:17-cv-60237-FAM.  On January 30, 2017, the plaintiff filed a putative class action lawsuit against us, alleging violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991 (the “TCPA”).  Specifically, the complaint asserts a violation of the TCPA for allegedly sending unsolicited automated messages to the cellular telephones of the plaintiff and others.  The complaint seeks class certification and damages of $500 per violation plus treble damages under the TCPA.  WeIn March 2017, we filed our initial response to this matter with the court incourt. In March 2017.  The parties attended a mediation in June 2017.  In July 2017,2018, the parties reached anexecuted a settlement agreement, in principle to settle this matter,which remains subject to final court approvalapproval. In April 2018, the court preliminarily approved the settlement agreement and certified a class for settlement purposes. In May 2018, the class members were sent notice of the settlement, and the executioncourt has scheduled a hearing for final approval of a finalthe settlement agreement.  We recorded an estimated loss provision of $6.2 million in connection with the proposed settlement in the second quarter ended July 29, 2017.on August 2, 2018.

Skylar Ward, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, v. Tilly’s, Inc., Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, Case No. BC595405.  In September 2015, the plaintiff filed a putative class action lawsuit against us alleging,


11

Table of Contents

among other things, various violations of California's wage and hour rules and regulations and unfair competition law.  Specifically, the complaint asserted a violation of the applicable California Wage Order for alleged failure to pay reporting time pay, as well as several derivative claims.laws.  The complaint sought class certification, of a class, unspecified damages, unpaid wages, penalties, restitution, and attorneys' fees.  In June 2016, the court granted our demurrer to the plaintiff's complaint on the grounds that the plaintiff failed to state a cause of action against Tilly's.Tilly's and dismissed the complaint.  Specifically, the court agreed with us that the plaintiff's cause of action for reporting-time pay fails as a matter of law as the plaintiff and other putative class members did not "report for work" with respect to certain shifts on which the plaintiff's claims are based.  At the hearing on the plaintiff's demurrer, the court granted the plaintiff leave to amend her complaint.  The plaintiff filed an amended complaint in July 2016, which brought the same claims as her original complaint but added various factual allegations.  In August 2016, we filed a demurrer as to the plaintiff's amended complaint, on the grounds that the plaintiff's amended complaint still failed to state a cause of action against Tilly's, for the same reasons that the court granted our demurrer as to the plaintiff's original complaint. In November 2016, the court entered a written order sustaining our demurrer to the plaintiff's complaint and dismissing all of plaintiff’s causes of action with prejudice.  In January 2017, the plaintiff filed an appeal of the order to the California Court of Appeal,Appeal. In October 2017, the plaintiff filed her opening appellate brief, and the plaintiff’s openingour responding appellate brief was most recently due to be filed on July 31, 2017, pursuant toin December 2017. In May 2018, the parties’ stipulation, but itplaintiff filed her reply appellate brief.  Later in May 2018, an amicus brief was not filed on that date. On August 16, 2017, the clerkby Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc., in support of the California Court of Appeal sent a letter to the parties advising of plaintiff’s defaultTilly’s position in filing the opening brief, and setting the deadline for plaintiffs to do so within 15 days, per California Rule of Court Rule 8.220.  Accordingly, the plaintiff’s opening brief is now due to be filed on August 31, 2017.this appeal. We have defended this case vigorously, and will continue to do so.
Karina Whitten, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, v. Tilly’s Inc., Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, Case No. BC548252In June 2014, the plaintiff filed a putative class action and representative Private Attorney General Act of 2004 lawsuit against us alleging violations of California’s wage and hour, meal break and rest break rules and regulations, and unfair competition law, among other things. The complaint sought class certification, penalties, restitution,
injunctive relief and attorneys’ fees and costs. The plaintiff filed a first amended complaint in December 2014. We answered the complaint in January 2015, denying all allegations. We engaged in mediation in May 2016, and the parties reached a resolution that was presented to the court for preliminary approval in September 2016. The court preliminarily approved the settlement in October 2016, and notice of the settlement was issued to class members. Upon completion of the claims process, the court approved the final settlement in February 2017.  We concluded this matter with the payment of the final settlement in April 2017. The final settlement amount was not materially different from the amount previously accrued when a loss provision was established.     
On June 10, 2015, we and one of our vendors entered into a settlement arrangement with a plaintiff who filed a copyright infringement lawsuit against usthe vendor and the vendorus related to certain vendor products we sell. The settlement requiresrequired that the vendor pay $2.0 million to the plaintiff over three years, and we have agreed to guarantee such payments. In the event of the vendor's default, the current estimated range of a reasonably possible loss is zero to $0.7 million. We will utilize all available rights of offset to reduce our potential loss, including application of amounts owed by us to the vendor from our ongoing purchases of the vendor's merchandise and/or the enforcement ofpayments in exchange for a security interest we have in the vendor's intellectual property.  We concluded this matter with the final settlement payment on June 5, 2018. The total settlement amount paid by us was not materially different from the amount previously accrued.
Note 6: Fair Value Measurements
We determine fair value based on a three-level valuation hierarchy as described below. Fair value is defined as the exit price associated with the sale of an asset or transfer of a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The three-level hierarchy of inputs used to determine fair value is as follows:
Level 1 – Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities.


13

Table of Contents

Level 2 – Inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.
Level 3 – Unobservable inputs (i.e. projections, estimates, interpretations, etc.) that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.
We measure certain financial assets at fair value on a recurring basis, including our marketable securities, which are classified as either available-for-sale or held-to-maturity securities, and certain cash equivalents, specifically money market securities, commercial paper and bonds. The money market accounts are valued based on quoted market prices in active markets. The marketable securities are valued based on other observable inputs for those securities (including market corroborated pricing or other models that utilize observable inputs such as interest rates and yield curves) based on information provided by independent third party entities.


12

Table of Contents

From time to time, we measure certain assets at fair value on a non-recurring basis, including evaluation of long-lived assets for impairment using Company specific assumptions which would fall within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
Fair value calculations contain significant judgments and estimates, which may differ from actual results due to, among other things, economic conditions, changes to the business model or changes in operating performance.
During the second quartersthree months ended JulyMay 5, 2018 and April 29, 2017, and July 30, 2016, we did not make any transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 financial assets. Furthermore, as of JulyMay 5, 2018, February 3, 2018 and April 29, 2017, January 28, 2017 and July 30, 2016, we did not have any Level 3 financial assets. We conduct reviews on a quarterly basis to verify pricing, assess liquidity and determine if significant inputs have changed that would impact the fair value hierarchy disclosure.
Financial Assets
We have categorized our financial assets based on the priority of the inputs to the valuation technique for the instruments as follows (in thousands): 
July 29, 2017 January 28, 2017 July 30, 2016May 5, 2018 February 3, 2018 April 29, 2017
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
Cash equivalents (1):
                                  
Money market securities$35,508
 $
 $
 $76,177
 $
 $
 $50,848
 $
 $
$26,874
 $
 $
 $46,441
 $
 $
 $48,456
 $
 $
Commercial paper
 
 
 
 4,993
 
 
 
 
Fixed income securities
 5,023
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Marketable securities:                                  
Commercial paper$
 $44,883
 $
 $
 $44,892
 $
 $
 $39,926
 $
$
 $49,700
 $
 $
 $59,589
 $
 $
 $44,807
 $
Fixed income securities
 21,181
 
 
 10,031
 
 
 
 

 14,099
 
 
 23,161
 
 
 8,026
 
(1) Excluding cash.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
An impairment is recorded on a long-lived asset used in operations whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the net carrying amounts for such asset may not be recoverable. Important factors that could result in an impairment review include, but are not limited to, significant under-performance relative to historical or planned operating results, significant changes in the manner of use of the assets or significant changes in our business strategies. An evaluation is performed using estimated undiscounted future cash flows from operating activities compared to the carrying value of related assets for the individual stores. If the undiscounted future cash flows are less than the carrying value, an impairment loss is recognized for the difference between the carrying value and the estimated fair value of the assets based on the discounted cash flows of the assets using a rate that approximates our weighted average cost of capital. With regard to retail store assets, which are comprised of leasehold improvements, fixtures and computer hardware and software, we consider the assets at each individual retail store to represent an asset group. In addition, we have considered the relevant valuation techniques that could be applied without undue cost and effort and have determined that the discounted estimated future cash flow approach provides the most relevant and reliable means by which to determine fair value in this circumstance.
On a quarterly basis, we assess whether events or changes in circumstances have occurred that potentially indicate the carrying value of long-lived assets may not be recoverable. During the secondfirst quarter of fiscal 2017,ended May 5, 2018, based on Level 3 inputs of historical operating performance, including sales trends, gross margin rates, current cash flows from operations and the projected outlook for each of our stores, we determined that twoone of our stores would not be able to generate sufficient cash flows over the remaining term of the related leaseslease to recover our investment in the respective stores.store. As a result, we recorded non-cash impairment charges during the three and six months ended July 29, 2017May 5, 2018 of approximately $0.5$0.1 million, to write-down the carrying value of certain long-lived store assets to their estimated fair values.
 Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
 July 29,
2017
 July 30,
2016
 July 29,
2017
 July 30,
2016
 ($ in thousands)
Carrying value of assets with impairment$451 $840 $451 $1,696
Fair value of assets impaired$— $— $— $173
Number of stores tested for impairment6 12 8 13
Number of stores with impairment2 3 2 6


1314

Table of Contents

carrying value of certain long-lived store assets. We did not incur non-cash impairment charges during the first quarter ended April 29, 2017.
 Three Months Ended
 May 5,
2018
 April 29,
2017
 ($ in thousands)
Carrying value of assets with impairment$145 NA
Fair value of assets impaired$— NA
Number of stores tested for impairment4 7
Number of stores with impairment1 
NA - Not applicable.
Note 7: Share-Based Compensation
The Tilly's, Inc. 2012 Amended and Restated Equity and Incentive Plan, as amended in June 2014 (the "2012 Plan"), authorizes up to 4,413,900 shares for issuance of options, shares or rights to acquire our Class A common stock and allows for, among other things, operating income and comparable store sales growth targets as additional performance goals that may be used in connection with performance-based awards granted under the 2012 Plan. As of July 29, 2017,May 5, 2018, there were 1,723,7641,497,281 shares still available for future issuance under the 2012 Plan.
Stock Options
We grant stock options to certain employees that give them the right to acquire our Class A common stock under the 2012 Plan. The exercise price of options granted is equal to the closing price per share of our stock at the date of grant. The nonqualified options vest at a rate of 25% on each of the first four anniversaries of the grant date provided that the award recipient continues to be employed by us through each of those vesting dates, and expire ten years from the date of grant.
The following table summarizes the stock option activity for the six monthsfirst quarter ended July 29, 2017May 5, 2018 (aggregate intrinsic value in thousands):
Stock
Options
 
Grant Date
Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
 
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life (in Years)
 
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value (1)
Stock
Options
 
Grant Date
Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
 
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life (in Years)
 
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value (1)
Outstanding at January 28, 20171,842,375
 $9.98
  
Outstanding at February 3, 20181,851,250
 $9.50
  
Granted406,000
 $8.71
  301,625
 $11.33
  
Exercised(15,500) $6.76
  (11,125) $7.59
  
Forfeited(32,750) $8.92
  (18,500) $8.62
  
Expired(16,250) $13.87
  (2,000) $12.62
  
Outstanding at July 29, 20172,183,875
 $9.76
 7.5 $3,922
Vested and expected to vest at July 29, 20172,183,875
 $9.76
 7.5 $3,922
Exercisable at July 29, 2017995,875
 $12.25
 5.9 $852
Outstanding at May 5, 20182,121,250
 $9.78
 7.3 $4,853
Vested and expected to vest at May 5, 20182,121,250
 $9.78
 7.3 $4,853
Exercisable at May 5, 20181,080,375
 $11.10
 5.8 $1,978
(1)Intrinsic value for stock options is defined as the difference between the market price of our Class A common stock on the last business day of the fiscal quarter and the weighted average exercise price of in-the-money stock options outstanding at the end of each fiscal period. The market value per share was $10.12$11.17 at July 29, 2017.May 5, 2018.
The stock option awards were measured at fair value on the grant date using the Black-Scholes option valuation model. Key input assumptions used to estimate the fair value of stock options include the exercise price of the award, the expected option term, expected volatility of our stock over the option’s expected term, the risk-free interest rate over the option’s expected term and our expected annual dividend yield, if any. We account for forfeitures as they occur. We will issue shares of Class A common stock when the options are exercised.


15

Table of Contents

The fair values of stock options granted during the threefirst quarter ended May 5, 2018 and six months ended JulyApril 29, 2017 and July 30, 2016 were estimated on the grant date using the following assumptions: 
Three Months Ended Six Months EndedThree Months Ended
July 29,
2017
 July 30,
2016
 July 29,
2017
 July 30,
2016
May 5,
2018
 April 29,
2017
Weighted average grant-date fair value per option granted$4.60 $3.33 $4.02 $3.52$5.35 $4.01
Expected option term (1)5.0 years
 5.0 years
 5.0 years
 5.0 years
5.0 years
 5.0 years
Weighted average expected volatility factor (2)50.5% 66.2% 51.4% 62.1%51.6% 51.4%
Weighted average risk-free interest rate (3)1.8% 1.2% 1.9% 1.4%2.6% 1.9%
Expected annual dividend yield% % % %% %
(1)We have limited historical information regarding expected option term. Accordingly, we determine the expected option term of the awards using the latest historical data available from comparable public companies and management’s expectation of exercise behavior.
(2)Stock volatility for each grant is measured using the weighted average of historical daily price changes of our common stock over the most recent period equal to the expected option term of the awards.
(3)The risk-free interest rate is determined using the rate on treasury securities with the same term as the expected life of the stock option as of the grant date.


14

Table of Contents

Restricted Stock
Restricted stock awards ("RSAs") represent restricted shares of our common stock issued upon the date of grant in which the recipient's rights in the stock are restricted until the shares are vested, and restricted stock units ("RSUs") represent a commitment to issue shares of our common stock in the future upon vesting. Under the 2012 Plan, we may grant RSAs to independent members of our Board of Directors and RSUs to certain employees. RSAs granted to our Board of Directors vest at a rate of 50% on each of the first two anniversaries of the grant date provided that the respective award recipient continues to serve on our Board of Directors through each of those vesting dates. RSUs granted to certain employees vest at a rate of 25% on each of the first four anniversaries of the grant date provided that the respective recipient continues to be employed by us through each of those vesting dates. We determine the fair value of restricted stock underlying the RSAs and RSUs based upon the closing price of our Class A common stock on the date of grant.
A summary of the status of non-vested restricted stock changes during the six monthsfirst quarter ended July 29, 2017May 5, 2018 are presented below:
 
Restricted
Stock
 
Weighted
Average
Grant-Date
Fair Value
Nonvested at January 28, 2017166,960
 $12.12
Granted23,100
 $10.39
Vested(74,528) $11.09
Forfeited(3,750) $16.07
Nonvested at July 29, 2017111,782
 $12.32
 
Restricted
Stock
 
Weighted
Average
Grant-Date
Fair Value
Nonvested at February 3, 2018109,532
 $12.24
Vested(27,750) $16.07
Forfeited(875) $16.07
Nonvested at May 5, 201880,907
 $10.89
Stock-based compensation expense associated with stock options and restricted stock is recognized on a straight-line basis over the vestingrequisite service period. The following table summarizes stock-based compensation recorded in the Consolidated Statements of (Loss) IncomeOperations (in thousands):
Three Months Ended Six Months EndedThree Months Ended
July 29,
2017
 July 30,
2016
 July 29,
2017
 July 30,
2016
May 5,
2018
 April 29,
2017
Cost of goods sold$159
 $222
 $300
 $542
$140
 $141
Selling, general and administrative expenses459
 387
 895
 917
440
 436
Stock-based compensation$618
 $609
 $1,195
 $1,459
$580
 $577
At July 29, 2017,May 5, 2018, there was $4.9$4.5 million of total unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to unvested stock options and restricted stock. This cost has a weighted average remaining recognition of 2.52.7 years.


16

Table of Contents

Note 8: Income (Loss) Income Per Share
(Loss) Income (loss) per share is computed under the provisions of ASC 260, Earnings Per Share. Basic income (loss) income per share is computed based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earningsincome (loss) per share is computed based on the weighted average number of shares of common stock plus the effect of dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period using the treasury stock method, whereby proceeds from such exercise, unamortized compensation and hypothetical excess tax benefits, if any, on share-based awards are assumed to be used by us to purchase the common shares at the average market price during the period. Potentially dilutive shares of common stock represent outstanding stock options and RSAs.



15

Table of Contents

The components of basic and diluted income (loss) income per share are as follows (in thousands, except per share amounts):
 Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
 July 29,
2017
 July 30,
2016
 July 29,
2017
 July 30,
2016
Net (loss) income$(596) $1,433
 $(757) $(1,312)
Weighted average basic shares outstanding28,751
 28,462
 28,728
 28,443
Dilutive effect of stock options and restricted stock
 4
 
 
Weighted average shares for diluted earnings per share28,751
 28,466
 28,728
 28,443
Basic (loss) income per share of Class A and Class B common stock$(0.02) $0.05
 $(0.03) $(0.05)
Diluted (loss) income per share of Class A and Class B common stock$(0.02) $0.05
 $(0.03) $(0.05)
 Three Months Ended
 May 5,
2018
 April 29,
2017
Net income (loss)$1,223
 $(161)
Weighted average basic shares outstanding29,080
 28,705
Dilutive effect of stock options and restricted stock358
 
Weighted average shares for diluted income per share29,438
 28,705
Basic income (loss) per share of Class A and Class B common stock$0.04
 $(0.01)
Diluted income (loss) per share of Class A and Class B common stock$0.04
 $(0.01)

The following stock options and restricted stock have been excluded from the calculation of diluted income (loss) income per share as the effect of including these stock options and restricted stock would have been anti-dilutive (in thousands):
Three Months Ended Six Months EndedThree Months Ended
July 29,
2017
 July 30,
2016
 July 29,
2017
 July 30,
2016
May 5,
2018
 April 29,
2017
Stock options2,184
 2,097
 2,184
 2,097
797
 1,341
Restricted stock112
 52
 112
 173

 57
Total2,296
 2,149
 2,296
 2,270
797
 1,398



1617

Table of Contents

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion and analysis of the financial condition and results of our operations should be read together with the financial statements and related notes of Tilly’s, Inc. included in Part III Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and with our audited consolidated financial statements and the related notes included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 28, 2017.February 3, 2018. As used in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, except where the context otherwise requires or where otherwise indicated, the terms “company”“the Company”, “World of Jeans & Tops”, “we”, “our”, “us”, "Tillys" and “Tilly’s” refer to Tilly’s, Inc. and its subsidiary.
Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties, as well as assumptions that, if they never materialize or prove incorrect, could cause our results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. The statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that are not purely historical are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act. Forward-looking statements are often identified by the use of words such as, but not limited to, “anticipate”, “believe”, “can”, “continue”, “could”, “estimate”, “expect”, “intend”, “may”, “plan”, “project”, “seek”, “should”, “target”, “will”, “would” and similar expressions or variations intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements are based on the beliefs and assumptions of our management based on information currently available to management. These forward-looking statements are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, including the risks and uncertainties described under the section titled “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 28, 2017,February 3, 2018, those identified in this “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, and in other filings we may make with the Securities and Exchange Commission from time to time. Moreover, we operate in an evolving environment. New risk factors and uncertainties emerge from time to time and it is not possible for our management to predict all risk factors and uncertainties, nor can we assess the impact of all factors on our business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statement. We qualify all of our forward-looking statements by these cautionary statements.

Overview
Tillys is a destination youth culture specialty retailer of casual apparel, footwear and accessories for young men, young women, boys and girls. We believe we bring togetheroffer an unparalleled selectionextensive assortment of the most sought-aftericonic global, emerging, and proprietary brands rooted in the action sports, team sports, music, art and fashion inherent in thean active and outdoor West Coastsocial lifestyle. Our West Coast heritage dates back toTillys started operations in 1982, when Hezy Shaked and Tilly Levine opened our first store in Orange County, California. As of July 29, 2017,May 5, 2018, we operated 221222 stores, including three RSQ-branded pop-up stores, averaging 7,6007,500 square feet, in 31 states. We also sell our products through our e-commerce website, www.tillys.com.

Known or Anticipated Trends
The retail industry has experienced a general downward trend in customer traffic to physical stores for an extended period of time. Conversely, online shopping has generally increased and resulted in sustained online sales growth. We believe these market trends will continue, despite the improvement in store traffic that we have experienced during the first half of fiscal 2017.last six consecutive quarters. There can be no guarantee that our recent improvement in store traffic will continue given the broader industry trends.
We expect to open two new stores during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017. Rather than open a significant number of new stores, we will continue to focus our efforts on improving our existing stores, and expanding our online/digital capabilities through omni-channel initiatives designed to provide a seamless shopping experience for our customers, whether in-store or online.
During fiscal 2018, we currently plan to open up to 15 new stores and three additional RSQ-branded "pop-up" stores and close six stores. We will leverage existing markets where we believe our brand recognition can be enhanced with new stores that are planned to drive additional improvement to our operating income.
As a result of the Tax Reform Act, which was signed into law in December 2017, we expect our effective income tax rate will be reduced to approximately 27% for fiscal 2018.
How We Assess the Performance of Our Business

In assessing the performance of our business, we consider a variety of performance and financial measures. The key indicators of the financial condition and operating performance of our business are net sales, comparable store sales, gross profit, selling, general and administrative expenses and operating (loss) income.



17

Table of Contents

Net Sales

Net sales reflect revenue from the sale of our merchandise at store locations as well as sales of merchandise through our e-commerce platform, which is reflected in sales when the merchandise is received byshipped to the customer. Net sales also include shipping and handling fees for e-commerce shipments that have been deliveredshipped to the customer. Net sales are net of returns on sales during the period as well as an estimate of returns expected in the future stemming from current period sales. Net sales are


18

Table of Contents

adjusted for the unredeemed awards and accumulated partial points on our customer loyalty program. Revenue from the sale of gift cards is deferred and not included in net sales until the gift cards are used to purchase merchandise. However, over time, the redemption ofbased upon historical patterns, some gift cards becomes remotewill never be redeemed (referred to as "giftgift card breakage""breakage"). Revenue from estimatedBased on our historical gift card breakage rate, gift card breakage revenue is recognized over the redemption period in proportion to actual gift card redemptions and is also included in net sales.
Our business is seasonal and as a result our revenues fluctuate from quarter to quarter. In addition, our revenues in any given quarter can be affected by a number of factors including the timing of holidays and weather patterns. The third and fourth quarters of the fiscal year, which include the back-to-school and holiday sales seasons, have historically produced stronger sales and disproportionately stronger operating results than have the first two quarters of the fiscal year.
Comparable Store Sales
Comparable store sales is a measure that indicates the change in year-over-year comparable store sales which allows us to evaluate how our store base is performing. Numerous factors affect our comparable store sales, including:
 
overall economic trends;
our ability to attract traffic to our stores and e-commerce platform;
our ability to identify and respond effectively to consumer preferences and fashion trends;
competition;
the timing of our releases of new and seasonal styles;
changes in our product mix;
pricing;
the level of customer service that we provide in stores and through our e-commerce platform;
our ability to source and distribute products efficiently;
calendar shifts of holiday or seasonal periods;
the number and timing of store openings and the relative proportion of new stores to mature stores; and
the timing and success of promotional and advertising efforts.
Comparable store sales are sales from our e-commerce platform and stores open at least 12 full fiscal months as of the end of the current reporting period. A remodeled, relocated or refreshed store is included in comparable store sales, both during and after construction, if the square footage of the store used to sell merchandise was not changed by more than 20% and the store was not closed for more than five days in any fiscal month. We include sales from our e-commerce platform as part of comparable store sales as we manage and analyze our business on a single omni-channel and have substantially integrated our investments and operations for our stores and e-commerce platform to give our customers seamless access and increased ease of shopping. Comparable store sales exclude gift card breakage income and e-commerce shipping and handling fee revenue. Some of our competitors and other retailers may calculate comparable or “same store” sales differently than we do. As a result, data in this report regarding our comparable store sales may not be comparable to similar data made available by other retailers.


18

Table of Contents

Gross Profit
Gross profit is equal to our net sales less our cost of goods sold. Cost of goods sold reflects the direct cost of purchased merchandise as well as buying, distribution and occupancy costs. Buying costs include compensation and benefit expense for our internal buying organization. Distribution costs include costs for receiving, processing and warehousing our store merchandise, and shipping of merchandise to or from our distribution and e-commerce fulfillment centers and to our e-commerce customers and between store locations. Occupancy costs include the rent, common area maintenance, utilities, property taxes, security and depreciation costs of all store locations. These costs are significant and can be expected to continue to increase as our company grows. The components of our reported cost of goods sold may not be comparable to those of other retail companies.
We regularly analyze the components of gross profit as well as gross profit as a percentage of net sales. Specifically we look at the initial markup on purchases, markdowns and reserves, shrinkage, buying costs, distribution costs and occupancy costs. Any inability to obtain acceptable levels of initial markups, a significant increase in our use of markdowns or a significant increase in inventory shrinkage or inability to generate sufficient sales leverage on the buying, distribution and occupancy components of cost of goods sold could have an adverse impact on our gross profit and results of operations.


19

Table of Contents

Gross profit is also impacted by shifts in the proportion of sales of proprietary branded products compared to third-party branded products, as well as by sales mix shifts within and between brands and between major product departments such as 'young men's and women's apparel', footwear or accessories. A substantial shift in the mix of products could have a material impact on our results of operations. In addition, gross profit and gross profit as a percent of sales have historically been higher in the third and fourth quarters of the fiscal year, as these periods include the back-to-school and winter holiday selling seasons. In those periods, various costs, such as occupancy costs, generally do not increase in proportion to the seasonal sales increase.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Our selling, general and administrative, or SG&A, expenses are composed of store selling expenses and corporate-level general and administrative expenses. Store selling expenses include store and regional support costs, including personnel, advertising and debit and credit card processing costs, e-commerce receiving and processing costs and store supplies costs. General and administrative expenses include the payroll and support costs of corporate functions such as executive management, legal, accounting, information systems, human resources, impairment charges and other centralized services. Store selling expenses generally vary proportionately with net sales and store growth. In contrast, general and administrative expenses are generally not directly proportional to net sales and store growth, but will be expected to increase over time to support the needs of our growing company. SG&A expenses as a percentage of net sales are usually higher in lower volume periods and lower in higher volume periods.
Operating (Loss) Income
Operating (loss) income equals gross profit less SG&A expenses. Operating (loss) income excludes interest income, interest expense and income taxes. Operating (loss) income percentage measures operating (loss) income as a percentage of our net sales.



19

Table of Contents

Results of Operations
The following tables summarize key components of our unaudited results of operations for the periods indicated, both in dollars (in thousands) and as a percentage of our net sales.
Three Months Ended Six Months EndedThree Months Ended
July 29,
2017
 July 30,
2016
 July 29,
2017
 July 30,
2016
May 5,
2018
 April 29,
2017
    
Statements of Operations Data:          
Net sales$138,810
 $136,412

$259,757

$256,630
$123,634

$120,947
Cost of goods sold97,881
 97,575

185,923

185,206
88,657

88,042
Gross profit40,929
 38,837

73,834

71,424
34,977

32,905
Selling, general and administrative expenses42,168
 36,605

75,402

73,159
33,646

33,234
Operating (loss) income(1,239) 2,232

(1,568)
(1,735)
Operating income (loss)1,331

(329)
Other income, net197
 91

435

167
383

238
(Loss) Income before income taxes(1,042) 2,323

(1,133)
(1,568)
Income tax (benefit) expense(446) 890

(376)
(256)
Net (loss) income$(596) $1,433

$(757)
$(1,312)
Income (loss) before income taxes1,714

(91)
Income tax expense491

70
Net income (loss)$1,223

$(161)
          
Percentage of Net Sales:          
Net sales100.0 % 100.0% 100.0 % 100.0 %100.0% 100.0 %
Cost of goods sold70.5 % 71.5% 71.6 % 72.2 %71.7% 72.8 %
Gross profit29.5 % 28.5% 28.4 % 27.8 %28.3% 27.2 %
Selling, general and administrative expenses30.4 % 26.8% 29.0 % 28.5 %27.2% 27.5 %
Operating (loss) income(0.9)% 1.7% (0.6)% (0.7)%
Operating income (loss)1.1% (0.3)%
Other income, net0.1 % 0.0% 0.2 % 0.1 %0.3% 0.2 %
(Loss) Income before income taxes(0.8)% 1.7% (0.4)% (0.6)%
Income tax (benefit) expense(0.4)% 0.6% (0.1)% (0.1)%
Net (loss) income(0.4)% 1.1% (0.3)% (0.5)%
Income (loss) before income taxes1.4% (0.1)%
Income tax expense0.4% 0.1 %
Net income (loss)1.0% (0.1)%


20

Table of Contents

The following table presents store operating data for the periods indicated:
Three Months Ended Six Months EndedThree Months Ended
July 29,
2017
 July 30,
2016
 July 29,
2017
 July 30,
2016
May 5,
2018
 April 29,
2017
Operating Data:          
Stores operating at end of period221
 225
 221
 225
222
 222
Comparable store sales change (1)
2.1% 0.9% 1.4% (1.4)%0.1% 0.6%
Total square feet at end of period (in thousands)1,690
 1,713
 1,690
 1,713
1,675
 1,697
Average net sales per brick-and-mortar store (in thousands) (2)
$549
 $533
 $1,020
 $1,001
Average net sales per retail store (in thousands) (2)
$493
 $470
Average net sales per square foot (2)
$72
 $70
 $133
 $132
$65
 $62
E-commerce revenues (in thousands) (3)
$16,853
 $16,199
 $33,105
 $31,527
$15,133
 $16,252
E-commerce revenues as a percentage of net sales12.1% 11.9% 12.7% 12.3 %12.2% 13.4%
(1)Comparable store sales are net sales from stores that have been open at least 12 full fiscal months as of the end of the current reporting period. A remodeled or relocated store is included in comparable store sales, both during and after construction, if the square footage of the store used to sell merchandise was not changed by more than 20% and the store was not closed for more than five days in any fiscal month. Comparable store sales include sales through our e-commerce platform but exclude gift card breakage income, deferred revenue on loyalty program and e-commerce shipping and handling fee revenue.
(2)E-commerce sales, e-commerce shipping and handling fee revenue and gift card breakage are excluded from net sales in deriving average net sales per brick-and-mortarretail store.
(3)E-commerce revenues include e-commerce sales and e-commerce shipping fee revenue.


20

Table of Contents

SecondFirst Quarter Ended JulyMay 5, 2018 Compared to First Quarter Ended April 29, 2017 Compared to Second Quarter Ended July 30, 2016
Net Sales
Net sales were $138.8$123.6 million in the secondfirst quarter of fiscal 2018 compared to $120.9 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2017, compared to $136.4 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2016, an increase of $2.4$2.7 million, or 1.8%2.2%.
The increasesincrease in net sales were attributedwas primarily attributable to an increasethe calendar shift impact of the 53rd week in comparablefiscal 2017's retail calendar. Comparable store sales, of 2.1%including e-commerce, increased 0.1%, driven by an increase in store traffic and e-commerce growth as compared to the secondfirst quarter of fiscal 2016.2017. E-commerce revenues represented 12.1%12.2% of our total net sales, or $16.9$15.1 million, in the secondfirst quarter of fiscal 2017 as2018 compared to 11.9%13.4%, or $16.2$16.3 million, in the secondfirst quarter of fiscal 2016.2017. Our comparable store sales were characterized by high single-digit percentage increasesgrowth was primarily attributable to strength in our branded mens, and low single-digit percentage increases in womens, boys, girls and footwear departments,merchandise assortments, partially offset by low single-digit percentage decreasesweakness in girlsour womens and accessories departments.assortments.
Gross Profit  ��    
Gross profit was $40.9$35.0 million in the secondfirst quarter of fiscal 20172018 compared to $38.8$32.9 million in the secondfirst quarter of fiscal 2016,2017, an increase of $2.1 million, or 5.4%6.4%. Gross margin, or gross profit as a percentage of net sales, was 29.5%28.3% during the secondfirst quarter of fiscal 2017 and 28.5%2018, an improvement of 110 basis points compared to 27.2% during the secondfirst quarter of fiscal 2016.2017. The comparable changes in gross margin were as follows:
%Attributable to
0.6%1.2%IncreaseDecrease in buying, distribution and occupancy costs of $0.7 million, primarily due to distribution savings and occupancy reductions.
(0.1)%Decrease in product margins primarily due to lower markdownsinitial markups as a result of a change in our product mix towards more branded merchandise.
0.4%Decrease in distribution, buying and occupancy costs as a percentage of net sales, primarily due to an increase in sales
1.0%1.1%Total
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
SG&A expenses were $42.2$33.6 million in the secondfirst quarter of fiscal 2018 compared to $33.2 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2017, compared to $36.6 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2016, an increase of $5.6$0.4 million, or 15.3%1.2%. As a percentage of net sales, SG&A expenses were 30.4%27.2% for the secondfirst quarter of fiscal 20172018, an improvement of 30 basis points compared to 26.8%27.5% during the secondfirst quarter of fiscal 2016.2017. The components of


21

Table of Contents

the SG&A increase,variances, both in terms of percentage of net sales and total dollars, were as follows:
% $ millionsAttributable to
4.4% $6.2Increase due to a legal provision
0.4% 0.6Increase in expenses associated with several information technology system implementations
0.2% 0.5Increase in store payroll, primarily as a result of minimum wage increases
(1.0)% (1.4)Decrease in marketing spend
(0.3)% (0.4)Decrease in non-cash store impairment charges
(0.1)% 0.1Increase in all other SG&A expenses
3.6% $5.6Total
% $ millionsAttributable to
(0.2)% $0.3Decrease in corporate and store payroll and benefits expenses as a percentage of net sales. The dollar increase was primarily attributable to minimum wage increases in certain jurisdictions.
(0.1)% 0.1Net change in all other SG&A expenses. The dollar increase was primarily attributable to increased expenses associated with new order management, website and point-of-sale systems.
(0.3)% $0.4Total
Operating Income (Loss) Income
Operating lossincome was $(1.2)$1.3 million, or (0.9)%1.1% of net sales, in the secondfirst quarter of fiscal 20172018 compared to operating incomeloss of $2.2$0.3 million, or 1.7%(0.3)% of net sales, for the second quarter of fiscal 2016. The operating loss was primarily due to the $6.2 million legal provision recorded in the secondfirst quarter of fiscal 2017.
Income Tax (Benefit) Expense
Income tax benefitexpense was $(0.4)$0.5 million in the secondfirst quarter of fiscal 2018 compared to $0.1 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2017. Our effective tax rate was 28.6% for first quarter of fiscal 2018. Income tax expense includes discrete charges related to stock grant activity for both periods.
Net Income (Loss) and Income (Loss) Per Share
Net income was $1.2 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2018 compared to net loss of $0.2 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2017, comparedrepresenting an increase of $1.4 million, attributable to the factors discussed above. Diluted income tax expense of $0.9 million inper share was $0.04 for the secondfirst quarter of fiscal 2016. Our effective tax rates were 42.8% and 38.3% for second quarter2018 compared to a loss per share of fiscal 2017 and second quarter of fiscal 2016, respectively. The increase in our effective tax rate$0.01 for the second quarter of fiscal 2017 was primarily due to the effect of discrete items related to the expiration of stock options, exercises of stock options and settlement of restricted stock during the secondfirst quarter of fiscal 2017.


21

Table of Contents


Net (Loss) Income and (Loss) Income Per Share
Net loss was $(0.6) million for the second quarter of fiscal 2017 compared to net income of $1.4 million for the second quarter of fiscal 2016, representing a decrease of $2.0 million, due to the factors discussed above. Loss per share was $(0.02) for the second quarter of fiscal 2017 compared to income per share of $0.05 for the second quarter of fiscal 2016.

First Half Ended July 29, 2017 Compared to First Half Ended July 30, 2016
Net Sales
Net sales were $259.8 million in the first half of fiscal 2017 compared to $256.6 million in the first half of fiscal 2016, an increase of $3.1 million, or 1.2%.
The increases in net sales were attributed to an increase in comparable store sales of 1.4% driven by an increase in store traffic, and e-commerce growth as compared to the first half of fiscal 2016. E-commerce revenues represented 12.7% of our total net sales, or $33.1 million, in the first half of fiscal 2017 as compared to 12.3%, or $31.5 million, in the first half of fiscal 2016. Our comparable store sales were characterized by single-digit percentage increases in mens, boys and womens departments, partially offset by low single-digit percentage decreases in girls, footwear and accessories departments.
Gross Profit
Gross profit was $73.8 million in the first half of fiscal 2017 compared to $71.4 million in first half of fiscal 2016, an increase of $2.4 million, or 3.4%. Gross margin, or gross profit as a percentage of net sales, was 28.4% and 27.8% during the first half of fiscal 2017 and fiscal 2016, respectively. The comparable changes in gross margin were as follows:
%Attributable to
(0.6)%Decrease in buying, distribution and occupancy costs
—%Product margins were flat
(0.6)%Total
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
SG&A expenses were $75.4 million in the first half of fiscal 2017 compared to $73.2 million in the first half of fiscal 2016, an increase of $2.2 million, or 3.1%. As a percentage of net sales, SG&A expenses were 29.0% and 28.5% during the first half of fiscal 2017 and fiscal 2016, respectively. The components of the SG&A increase, both in terms of percentage of net sales and total dollars, were as follows:
%$ millionsAttributable to
1.7%$4.5Net increase in year over year legal provisions
0.3%0.9Increase in expenses associated with several information technology system implementations
0.2%0.8Increase in store payroll, primarily due to minimum wage increases
(1.0)%(2.5)Decrease in marketing spend
(0.4)%(1.1)Decrease in non-cash store asset impairment charges
(0.3)%(0.4)Decrease in all other SG&A expenses
0.5%$2.2Total
Operating Loss

Operating loss was $(1.6) million, or (0.6)% of net sales, for the first half of fiscal 2017 compared to $(1.7) million, or (0.7)% of net sales, for the first half of fiscal 2016.
Income Tax Benefit
Income tax benefit was $(0.4) million, or 33.2% of loss before taxes, for the first half of fiscal 2017 compared to $(0.3) million, or 16.3% of loss before taxes, for the first half of fiscal 2016. The increase in our effective tax rate for the first half of fiscal 2017 was primarily due to discrete items related to the expiration of stock options, exercises of stock options and settlement of restricted stock during the first half of 2017.


22

Table of Contents

Net Loss and Loss Per Share
Net loss was $(0.8) million for the first half of fiscal 2017 compared to $(1.3) million for the first half of fiscal 2016, due to the factors discussed above. Basic and diluted loss per share was $(0.03) for the first half of fiscal 2017 compared to $(0.05) for the first half of fiscal 2016.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our primary cash needs are for merchandise inventories, payroll, store rent and capital expenditures. We have historically provided for these needs from internally generated cash flows. In addition, we have access to additional liquidity through a $25.0 million revolving credit facility with Wells Fargo Bank, NA. We expect to continue to finance our operations from cash and marketable securities on hand as well as cash flows from operations without borrowing under our revolving credit facility over the next twelve months.
Working capital at July 29, 2017,May 5, 2018, was $106.7$113.3 million compared to $129.8$107.4 million at January 28, 2017, a decreaseFebruary 3, 2018, an increase of $23.1$5.8 million. The changes in our working capital during the first halfquarter of fiscal 20172018 were as follows:
$ millionsDescription
$129.8107.4Working capital at January 28, 2017February 3, 2018
(24.3)3.3
Decrease in cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities,deferred revenue primarily due to the paymentbalance sheet implementation impacts of a $20.1 million special dividend in February 2017our adoption of ASC 606, Revenue Recognition.
1.22.6Net increase from changes in all other current assets and liabilities
$106.7113.3Working capital at July 29, 2017May 5, 2018
Cash Flow Analysis

A summary of operating, investing and financing activities is shown in the following table (in thousands):
 Six Months Ended
 July 29,
2017
 July 30,
2016
Net cash provided by operating activities$2,868
 $6,212
Net cash used in investing activities(17,770) (245)
Net cash used in financing activities(20,525) (521)
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents$(35,427) $5,446
 Three Months Ended
 May 5,
2018
 April 29,
2017
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities$670
 $(5,039)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities16,399
 (779)
Net cash used in financing activities(29,081) (20,363)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents$(12,012) $(26,181)
Net Cash Provided By (Used In) Operating Activities
Operating activities consist primarily of net income adjusted for non-cash items that include depreciation, asset impairment write-downs, deferred income taxes and share-based compensation expense, plus the effect on cash of changes during the year in our assets and liabilities.
Net cash flows provided by operating activities were $2.9$0.7 million during the first halfquarter of fiscal 20172018 compared to $6.2net cash flows used in operating activities of $5.0 million in the first halfquarter of fiscal 2016.2017. The $3.3$5.7 million decreaseincrease in cash provided by operating activities was primarily due to the timing of payroll and vendor payments.payments and net income.


22

Table of Contents

Net Cash Used InProvided By (Used In) Investing Activities
Cash flows from investing activities consist primarily of capital expenditures and maturities and purchases of marketable securities.
Net cash provided by investing activities was $16.4 million during the first quarter of fiscal 2018 compared to net cash used in investing activities was $17.8of $0.8 million during the first halfquarter of fiscal 2017 compared to $0.2 million during2017. Net cash provided by investing activities in the first halfquarter of fiscal 2016.2018 consisted of proceeds from marketable securities of $40.4 million, partially offset by purchases of marketable securities of $21.1 million and capital expenditures totaling $2.9 million. Net cash used in investing activities induring the first halfquarter of fiscal 2017 primarily consisted of capital expenditures totaling $7.0$3.0 million and purchases of marketable securities of $62.9$29.8 million, partially offset by proceeds from the maturities of marketable securities of $52.1$32.0 million. Net cash used in investing activities during the first half of fiscal 2016 primarily consisted of capital expenditures totaling $10.4 million, partially offset by net proceeds from marketable securities of $10.1 million.


23

Table of Contents

Net Cash Used in Financing Activities
Cash flows used in financingFinancing activities primarily consist primarily of cash dividend payments, payments on our capital lease obligation andtaxes paid in lieu of shares issued for share based compensation, proceeds from employee exercises of stock options.options and payments on a capital lease obligation.
Net cash used in financing activities was $20.5$29.1 million during the first halfquarter of fiscal 20172018 compared to $0.5$20.4 million during the first halfquarter of fiscal 2016.2017. Financing activities in the first halfquarter of fiscal 2018 primarily consisted of dividends paid of $29.1 million. Financing activities in the first quarter of fiscal 2017 primarily consisted of dividends paid of $20.1 million and cash payments on oura capital lease obligation of $0.4$0.2 million. Financing activities in the first half of fiscal 2016 primarily consisted of cash payments on our capital lease obligation of $0.4 million.

Line of Credit

Our amended and restated credit agreement with Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (the "Bank") provides for a $25.0 million revolving line of credit with a maturity date of June 26, 2020. The interest rate charged on borrowings is selected at our discretion at the time of draw between the London Interbank Offered Rate, plus 0.75%, or at the Bank’s prime rate. The agreement allows for the declaration and payment of dividends or distributions to stockholders.stockholders, subject to certain limitations. On January 31,February 20, 2018 and February 24, 2017, our Board of Directors declaredwe paid a special cash dividend of $1.00 per share and $0.70 per share, respectively, to all holders of record of issued and outstanding shares of both Class A and Class B common stock as of the close of business on February 15, 2017. Payment of the dividend was made on February 24, 2017.stock. The line of credit is secured by substantially all of our assets. As a sub-feature under the credit agreement, the Bank may also issue stand-by and/or commercial letters of credit up to $15.0 million.

We are required to maintain certain financial and non-financial covenants in accordance with the line of credit. The financial covenants require certain levels of leverage and profitability, such as (i) income before income taxes not to be less than $1.0 million (calculated at the end of each fiscal quarter on a trailing 12-month basis), (ii) a maximum ratio of 4.00 to 1.00 as of each quarter end for “Funded Debt to EBITDAR”, defined as the sum of total debt, capital leases and annual rent expense multiplied by six divided by the sum of net income, interest expense, taxes, depreciation, amortization and annual rent expense on a trailing 12-month basis, and (iii) requires minimum eligible inventory, cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities totaling $50.0 million as of the end of each quarter. In addition, maximum investment in fixed assets in any fiscal year of $50.0 million.
In September 2016, we established a $750,000 standby letter of credit as security against insurance claims as required by our workers compensation insurance policy.  There has been no activity under this letter of credit since its inception.
As of July 29, 2017,May 5, 2018, we were in compliance with all of our covenants and had no outstanding borrowings under the revolving credit facility.
Contractual Obligations
As of July 29, 2017,May 5, 2018, there were no material changes to our contractual obligations as described in the “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” section of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 28, 2017.

February 3, 2018.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We are not a party to any off-balance sheet arrangements, except for operating leases, purchase obligations and our revolving credit facility.


23

Table of Contents

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S.United States requires the appropriate application of certain accounting policies, some of which require us to make estimates and assumptions about future events and their impact on amounts reported in our consolidated financial statements. Since future events and their impact cannot be determined with absolute certainty, the actual results will inevitably differ from our estimates. A summary of our significant accounting policies is included in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 28, 2017.February 3, 2018.
Recently Adopted Accounting Standard
On January 29, 2017,February 4, 2018, we adopted Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2016-09, Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting, which simplifies the accounting and reporting for share-based compensation, including the


24

Table of Contents

accounting for income taxes, forfeitures and statutory tax withholding requirements, as well as the classification in the statement of cash flows. We elected to account for forfeitures as they occur, rather than estimate expected forfeitures. The adoption of ASU 2016-09 resulted in a cumulative-effect adjustment of $0.2 million decrease to retained earnings and a $0.2 million increase to additional paid-in-capital as of January 29, 2017, related to the recognition of previously estimated expected forfeitures using the modified retrospective method. We adopted the cash flow presentation which requires excess tax benefits to be presented as an operating activity rather than a financing activity. The adoption of this update did not have an effect on our consolidated results of operations.
New Accounting Standards Not Yet Adopted
In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the "FASB") issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASU 2014-09”), along with amendments issued in 2015 and 2016, which amends the existing accounting standards for revenue recognition. ASU 2014-09 outlines principles that govern revenue recognition at an amount an entity expects to be entitled when products are transferred to customers. ASU 2014-09, which will become effective for us in the first quarter of fiscal 2018, may be applied retrospectively for each period presented (the "full retrospective method") or retrospectively with the cumulative effect recognized in the opening retained earnings balance in fiscal year 2018 (the "modified retrospective method"). We currently anticipate adopting the standard using the modified retrospective method. We are in the process of evaluating the overall impact of adopting the new standard on our consolidated financial statements. Based on our preliminary assessment, we have determined that the adoption will change the timing of recognition of gift card breakage income, which is currently recognized under the remote method and recorded in net sales. The new guidance will require recognition of gift card breakage income proportionately in net sales as redemptions occur. The new guidance also requires enhanced disclosures, such as revenue recognition policies that require significant judgment and identification of performance obligations to customers. We currently do not expect the adoption of this update to have a material effect on our consolidated results of operations.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Accounting Standards Codification 842). The new standard requires lessees to apply a dual approach, classifying leases as either finance or operating leases based on new revenue recognition requirements. The adoption impacted our critical accounting policies as follows:
Breakage revenue is now recognized over time in proportion to actual customer redemptions. Breakage revenue was previously recognized two full fiscal years after the principlegift cards were activated when the probability of whetherredemption was considered remote.
Revenue for merchandise shipped to the customer from a distribution center or notstore is now recognized at the lease is effectively a financed purchase by the lessee. This classification will determine whether lease expense isshipping point, whereas it was previously recognized based on an effective interest method or on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. A lessee is also required to record a right-of-use asset and a lease liability for all leases with a term of greater than 12 months regardless of their classification. Leases with a term of 12 months or less will be accounted for similar to existing guidance for operating leases. ASU 2016-02, which will become effective for us in the first quarter of fiscal 2019, with early adoption permitted, must be adopted using the modified retrospective method. The new standard is expected to impact our consolidated financial statements as we conduct all of our retail sales and corporate operations in leased facilities. We are in the process of evaluating the impact of adopting the new standard on our consolidated financial statements.upon customer receipt.


Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
As of July 29, 2017,May 5, 2018, there were no material changes in the market risks described in the “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure of Market Risks” section of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 28, 2017.February 3, 2018.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management, with the participation of our Disclosure Committee, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of July 29, 2017.May 5, 2018. The term “disclosure controls and procedures,” as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act, means controls and other procedures of a company that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Based on the evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of July 29, 2017,May 5, 2018, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of such date, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level.


25

Table of Contents

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation required by Rule 13a-15(d) and 15d-15(d) of the Exchange Act that occurred during the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Inherent Limitations on Effectiveness of Controls
Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, believes that our disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting are designed to provide reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives and are effective at the reasonable assurance level. However, our management does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal control over financial reporting will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, have been detected.


24

Table of Contents

These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of a simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people or by management override of the controls. The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.


2625

Table of Contents

Part II. Other Information

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

From time to time, we may become involved in lawsuits and other claims arising from our ordinary course of business. We have established loss provisions of approximately $6.9$6.3 million for matters in which losses are probable and can be reasonably estimated. For some matters, we are currently unable to predict the ultimate outcome, determine whether a liability has been incurred or make an estimate of the reasonably possible liability that could result from an unfavorable outcome because of the uncertainties related to the incurrence, amount and range of loss on any pending litigation or claim. Because of the unpredictable nature of these matters, we cannot provide any assurances regarding the outcome of any litigation or claim to which we are a party or that the ultimate outcome of any of the matters threatened or pending against us, including those disclosed below, will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Juan Carlos Gonzales, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, v. Tilly’s Inc. et al, Superior Court of California, County of Orange, Case No. 30-2017-00948710-CU-OE-CXC.  In October 2017, the plaintiff filed a putative class action against us, alleging various violations of California’s wage and hour laws.  The complaint seeks class certification, unspecified damages, unpaid wages, penalties, restitution, interest, and attorneys’ fees and costs. In December 2017, we filed an answer to the complaint, denying all of the claims and asserting various defenses. In April 2018, the plaintiff filed a separate action under the Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) against us seeking penalties on behalf of himself and other similarly situated employees for the same alleged violations of California's wage and hour laws.  We have requested the plaintiff to dismiss the class action claims based on an existing class action waiver in an arbitration agreement which plaintiff signed with our co-defendant, BaronHR, the staffing company that employed plaintiff to work at the Company. If plaintiff refuses to dismiss the class claims from the class action, we will seek to enforce the class action waiver. We intend to defend this case vigorously.
Lauren Minniti, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, v. Tilly’s, Inc., United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, Case No. 0:17-cv-60237-FAM.  On January 30, 2017, the plaintiff filed a putative class action lawsuit against us, alleging violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991 (the “TCPA”).  Specifically, the complaint asserts a violation of the TCPA for allegedly sending unsolicited automated messages to the cellular telephones of the plaintiff and others.  The complaint seeks class certification and damages of $500 per violation plus treble damages under the TCPA.  WeIn March 2017, we filed our initial response to this matter with the court incourt. In March 2017. The parties attended a mediation in June 2017.  In July 2017,2018, the parties reached anexecuted a settlement agreement, in principle to settle this matter,which remains subject to final court approvalapproval. In April 2018, the court preliminarily approved the settlement agreement and certified a class for settlement purposes. In May 2018, the class members were sent notice of the settlement, and the executioncourt has scheduled a hearing for final approval of a finalthe settlement agreement.  We recorded an estimated loss provision of $6.2 million in connection with the proposed settlement in the second quarter ended July 29, 2017.on August 2, 2018.

Skylar Ward, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, v. Tilly’s, Inc., Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, Case No. BC595405.  In September 2015, the plaintiff filed a putative class action lawsuit against us alleging, among other things, various violations of California's wage and hour rules and regulations and unfair competition law.  Specifically, the complaint asserted a violation of the applicable California Wage Order for alleged failure to pay reporting time pay, as well as several derivative claims.laws.  The complaint sought class certification, of a class, unspecified damages, unpaid wages, penalties, restitution, and attorneys' fees.  In June 2016, the court granted our demurrer to the plaintiff's complaint on the grounds that the plaintiff failed to state a cause of action against Tilly's.Tilly's and dismissed the complaint.  Specifically, the court agreed with us that the plaintiff's cause of action for reporting-time pay fails as a matter of law as the plaintiff and other putative class members did not "report for work" with respect to certain shifts on which the plaintiff's claims are based.  At the hearing on the plaintiff's demurrer, the court granted the plaintiff leave to amend her complaint.  The plaintiff filed an amended complaint in July 2016, which brought the same claims as her original complaint but added various factual allegations.  In August 2016, we filed a demurrer as to the plaintiff's amended complaint, on the grounds that the plaintiff's amended complaint still failed to state a cause of action against Tilly's, for the same reasons that the court granted our demurrer as to the plaintiff's original complaint. In November 2016, the court entered a written order sustaining our demurrer to the plaintiff's complaint and dismissing all of plaintiff’s causes of action with prejudice.  In January 2017, the plaintiff filed an appeal of the order to the California Court of Appeal,Appeal. In October 2017, the plaintiff filed her opening appellate brief, and the plaintiff’s openingour responding appellate brief was most recently due to be filed on July 31, 2017, pursuant toin December 2017. In May 2018, the parties’ stipulation, but itplaintiff filed her reply appellate brief.  Later in May 2018, an amicus brief was not filed on that date.  On August 16, 2017, the clerkby Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc., in support of the California Court of Appeal sent a letter to the parties advising of plaintiff’s defaultTilly’s position in filing the opening brief, and setting the deadline for plaintiffs to do so within 15 days, per California Rule of Court Rule 8.220.  Accordingly, plaintiff’s opening brief is now due to be filed on August 31, 2017.this appeal. We have defended this case vigorously, and will continue to do so.
Karina Whitten, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, v. Tilly’s Inc., Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, Case No. BC548252In June 2014, the plaintiff filed a putative class action and representative Private Attorney General Act of 2004 lawsuit against us alleging violations of California’s wage and hour, meal break and rest break rules and regulations, and unfair competition law, among other things. The complaint sought class certification, penalties, restitution,
injunctive relief and attorneys’ fees and costs. The plaintiff filed a first amended complaint in December 2014. We answered the complaint in January 2015, denying all allegations. We engaged in mediation in May 2016, and the parties reached a resolution that was presented to the court for preliminary approval in September 2016. The court preliminarily approved the settlement in October 2016, and notice of the settlement was issued to class members. Upon completion of the claims process, the court approved the final settlement in February 2017.  We concluded this matter with the payment of the final settlement in April 2017. The final settlement amount was not materially different from the amount previously accrued when a loss provision was established.
On June 10, 2015, we and one of our vendors entered into a settlement arrangement with a plaintiff who filed a copyright infringement lawsuit against usthe vendor and the vendorus related to certain vendor products we sell. The settlement requiresrequired that the


27

Table of Contents

vendor pay $2.0 million to the plaintiff over three years, and we have agreed to guarantee such payments. In the event of the vendor's default, the current estimated range of a reasonably possible loss is zero to $0.7 million. We will utilize all available rights of offset to reduce our potential loss, including application of amounts owed by us to the vendor from our ongoing purchases of the vendor's merchandise and/or the enforcement ofpayments in exchange for a security interest we have in the vendor's intellectual property.

  We concluded this matter with the final settlement payment on June 5, 2018. The total settlement amount paid by us was not materially different from the amount previously accrued.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

We operate in a rapidly changing environment that involves a number of risks that could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, prospects, operating results or cash flows. For a detailed discussion of the risks that affect our business, please refer to the section entitled “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 28, 2017.February 3, 2018. There have been no material changes to our risk factors as previously disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K.





2826

Table of Contents

Item 5. Other Information
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
At the Company's 2018 annual meeting of its stockholders (the "Annual Meeting"), the Company’s stockholders voted on four proposals, as described below. As of the close of business on April 20, 2018, the record date for eligibility to vote at the Annual Meeting, there were 15,157,324 shares of Class A common stock and 13,988,497 shares of Class B common stock of the Company outstanding and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. Each share of Class A common stock was entitled to one (1) vote per share, and each share of Class B common stock was entitled to ten (10) votes per share. Accordingly, as of the record date, the total voting power of all of the shares of the Company's common stock entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting was 155,042,294 votes. Each of the proposals was described in detail in the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting. The vote totals noted below are final voting results from the Annual Meeting.
Proposal 1
The Company’s stockholders elected the following six directors for a term of office expiring at the Company’s 2019 annual meeting of its stockholders and until their successors are duly elected and qualified. There were no abstentions for Proposal 1.
NameVotes ForVotes WithheldBroker Non-Votes
Hezy Shaked151,175,013713,7421,654,756
Edmond Thomas151,333,662555,0931,654,756
Doug Collier151,333,437555,3181,654,756
Seth Johnson151,127,938760,8171,654,756
Janet Kerr151,452,393436,3621,654,756
Bernard Zeichner151,410,557478,1981,654,756
Proposal 2
The Company’s stockholders ratified the appointment of BDO USA, LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending February 2, 2019, as follows:
Votes ForVotes AgainstAbstentionsBroker Non-Votes
153,514,21214,93814,361
Proposal 3
Advisory vote to approve the compensation of our named executive officers for the fiscal year ending February 3, 2018.
Votes ForVotes AgainstAbstentionsBroker Non-Votes
151,761,90798,28428,5641,654,756
Proposal 4
Advisory vote on the frequency of future advisory votes by stockholders on the compensation of our named executive officers.
One YearTwo YearsThree YearsAbstentionsBroker Non-Votes
150,617,3453,6941,258,5509,1661,654,756



27

Table of Contents

Item 6. Exhibits
Exhibit
No.
  Description of Exhibit
   
  
  
  
  
  
  
101  Interactive data files from Tilly’s, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 29, 2017,May 5, 2018, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheets; (ii) the Consolidated Statements of (Loss) Income;Operations; (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) Income;; (iv) the Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity; (v) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and (vi) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

*Filed herewith
**
Furnished herewith and not “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





28

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
  Tilly’s, Inc.
Date:August 31, 2017June 12, 2018 
  /s/ Edmond S. Thomas
  Edmond S. Thomas
  President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
  (Principal Executive Officer)
   
Date:August 31, 2017June 12, 2018 
  /s/ Michael Henry
  Michael Henry
  Chief Financial Officer
  (Principal Financial Officer)



29