UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q



x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended ~~September 30, 2017~~March 31, 2018



¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _____ to ______

Commission File Number: 001-36612

ReWalk Robotics Ltd.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)



Israel		Not applicable
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. employer identification no.)

3 Hatnufa Street, Floor 6, Yokneam Ilit, Israel		2069203
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

+972.4.959.0123

Registrant's telephone number, including area code

Not Applicable

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by a check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting ~~company~~ ~~or an emerging growth company~~.company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer”, “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.



Large accelerated filer o	Accelerated filer o
Non-accelerated filer o	Smaller reporting company x
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Emerging growth company x

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x

As of ~~October 31, 2017~~May 11, 2018 the Registrant had outstanding ~~22,066,352~~30,633,885 ordinary shares, par value NIS 0.01 per share.

REWALK ROBOTICS LTD.

FORM 10-Q

FOR THE QUARTER ENDED ~~SEPTEMBER 30, 2017~~MARCH 31, 2018

TABLE OF CONTENTS



		Page No.
GENERAL AND WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION		2
PART I	FINANCIAL INFORMATION	3
ITEM 1.	FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)	3
	CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS - ~~SEPTEMBER 30, 2017~~MARCH 31, 2018 AND DECEMBER 31, ~~2016~~2017	3
	CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS- THREE ~~AND NINE~~ MONTHS ENDED ~~SEPTEMBER 30,~~MARCH 31, 2018 AND 2017 ~~AND 2016~~	5
	CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIENCY) - ~~SEPTEMBER 30, 2017~~MARCH 31, 2018 AND DECEMBER 31, ~~2016~~2017	6
	CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS - ~~NINE~~THREE MONTHS ENDED ~~SEPTEMBER 30,~~MARCH 31, 2018 AND 2017 ~~AND 2016~~	7
	NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS	8
ITEM 2.	MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS	2325
ITEM 3.	QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK	3536
ITEM 4.	CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES	3536
PART II	OTHER INFORMATION	3738
ITEM 1.	LEGAL PROCEEDINGS	3738
ITEM 1A.	RISK FACTORS	3738
ITEM 2.	UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS	4241
ITEM 3.	DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES	4341
ITEM 4.	MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES	4341
ITEM 5.	OTHER INFORMATION	4341
ITEM 6.	EXHIBITS	4442
SIGNATURES		4543

General and Where You Can Find Other Information

As used in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, the terms “ReWalk,” “we,” “us” and “our” refer to ReWalk Robotics Ltd. and its subsidiaries, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. Our website is www.rewalk.com. Information contained, or that can be accessed through, our website does not constitute a part of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q and is not incorporated by reference herein. We have included our website address in this quarterly report solely for informational purposes. Information that we furnish to or file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), including annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and any amendments to, or exhibits included in, these reports are available for download, free of charge, on our website as soon as reasonably practicable after such materials are filed with or furnished to the SEC. Our SEC filings, including exhibits filed or furnished therewith, are also available on the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov. You may obtain and copy any document we file with or furnish to the SEC at the SEC’s public reference room at 100 F Street, NE, Room 1580, Washington, D.C. 20549. You may obtain information on the operation of the SEC’s public reference facilities by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. You may request copies of these documents, upon payment of a duplicating fee, by writing to the SEC at its principal office at 100 F Street, NE, Room 1580, Washington, D.C. 20549.

Table of Contents

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

REWALK ROBOTICS LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Unaudited)

(In thousands, except share and per share data)


	September 30,		December 31,		March 31,		December 31,
	2017		2016		2018		2017
ASSETS

CURRENT ASSETS

Cash and cash equivalents	$	12,928	$	23,678	$	8,818	$	14,567
Trade receivable, net	1,265		1,254		1,566		1,103
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	1,703		1,291		2,018		1,625
Inventory	3,500		3,264
Inventories					3,480		3,643
Total current assets	19,396		29,487		15,882		20,938

LONG-TERM ASSETS

Other long term assets	1,182		1,018		1,082		1,085
Property and equipment, net	906		1,258		756		840
Total long-term assets	2,088		2,276		1,838		1,925

Total assets	$	21,484	$	31,763	$	17,720	$	22,863

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

REWALK ROBOTICS LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Unaudited)

(In thousands, except share and per share data)


	September 30,			December 31,			March 31,			December 31,
	2017			2016			2018			2017
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIENCY)
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Current maturities of long term loan	$	5,663		$	7,495		$	6,441		$	6,441
Trade payables	2,426			3,424			2,873			1,811
Employees and payroll accruals	858			1,019			926			872
Deferred revenues and customers advances	133			54			129			123
Other current liabilities	537			406			428			480
Total current liabilities	9,617			12,398			10,797			9,727

LONG-TERM LIABILITIES
Long term loan, net of current maturities	10,003			10,518			7,796			8,911
Deferred revenues	250			284			330			262
Other long-term liabilities	274			303			296			256
Total long-term liabilities	10,527			11,105			8,422			9,429

Total liabilities	20,144			23,503			19,219			19,156

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES
Shareholders’ equity:
Shareholders’ equity (deficiency):

Share capital
Ordinary shares, par value NIS 0.01 per share-Authorized: 250,000,000 shares at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016; Issued and outstanding: 21,823,771 and 16,338,257 shares at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively	60			45
Ordinary shares NIS 0.01 par value- Authorized: 250,000,000 shares at March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017; Issued and outstanding: 30,510,455 and 30,003,639 shares at March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively							86			84
Receivables on account of shares							(42		)	—
Additional paid-in capital	126,338			114,707			136,027			134,843
Accumulated deficit	(125,058		)	(106,492		)	(137,570		)	(131,220		)
Total shareholders’ equity	1,340			8,260
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	21,484		$	31,763
Total shareholders’ equity (deficiency)							(1,499		)	3,707
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity (deficiency)							$	17,720		$	22,863

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

REWALK ROBOTICS LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited)

(In thousands, except share and per share data)


	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,						Three Months Ended March 31,
	2017			2016			2017			2016			2018			2017
Revenues	$	1,732		$	1,400		$	6,238		$	4,278		$	1,579		$	2,499
Cost of revenues	1,024			1,110			3,740			3,410			897			1,450

Gross profit	708			290			2,498			868			682			1,049

Operating expenses:
Research and development, net	1,618			1,968			4,433			6,737			2,151			1,430
Sales and marketing	2,637			3,774			8,643			10,577			2,336			3,133
General and administrative	1,805			1,951			5,796			5,960			2,037			2,141

Total operating expenses	6,060			7,693			18,872			23,274			6,524			6,704

Operating loss	(5,352		)	(7,403		)	(16,374		)	(22,406		)	(5,842		)	(5,655		)
Loss on extinguishment of debt	—			—			313			—
Financial expenses, net	479			508			1,843			1,514			485			731

Loss before income taxes	(5,831		)	(7,911		)	(18,530		)	(23,920		)	(6,327		)	(6,386		)
Income taxes	15			9			25			39			—			14

Net loss	$	(5,846	)	$	(7,920	)	$	(18,555	)	$	(23,959	)	$	(6,327	)	$	(6,400	)

Net loss per ordinary share, basic and diluted	$	(0.27	)	$	(0.62	)	$	(1.00	)	$	(1.92	)	$	(0.21	)	$	(0.39	)

Weighted average number of shares used in computing net loss per ordinary share, basic and diluted	21,660,757			12,759,887			18,463,444			12,495,433			30,049,293			16,455,257

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these ~~condensed~~ consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

; REWALK ROBOTICS LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIENCY)

(Unaudited)

(In thousands, except share data)

Ordinary Share Additional
paid-in
capital Accumulated
deficit Total
shareholders’
equity
Number Amount
Balance as of January 1, 2016 12,222,583
33
94,876
(73,989 ) 20,920
Share-based compensation to employees and non-employees —
—
3,398
—
3,398
Issuance of ordinary shares upon exercise of options to purchase ordinary shares and RSUs by employees and non-employees 128,496
1
17
—
18
Issuance of ordinary shares in at-the-market offering, net of issuance expenses in the amount of $468 692,062
2
4,097
—
4,099
Issuance of warrants to purchase ordinary shares —
—
1,239
—
1,239
Cashless exercise of warrants into ordinary shares 45,116
*)
*)
—
—
Issuance of ordinary shares and warrants to purchase ordinary shares in follow-on public offering, net of issuance expenses
in an amount of $1,099 3,250,000
9
11,080
—
11,089
Net loss —
—
—
(32,503 ) (32,503 )

Balance as of December 31, 2016 16,338,257
45
114,707
(106,492 ) 8,260
Cumulative effect to stock based compensation from adoption of a new accounting standard —
—
11
(11 ) —
Share-based compensation to employees and non-employees —
—
2,597
—
2,597
Issuance of ordinary shares upon exercise of options to purchase ordinary shares and RSUs by employees and non-employees (1) 105,606
*)
28
—
28
Issuance of ordinary shares in at-the-market offering, net of issuance expenses in the amount of $439 (2) 5,379,908
15
8,995
—
9,010
Net loss —
—
—
(18,555 ) (18,555 )
Balance as of September 30, 2017 21,823,771
60
126,338
(125,058 ) 1,340



	Ordinary Share		Receivables on account of shares		Additional paid-in capital	Accumulated deficit		Total shareholders’ equity (deficiency)
	Number	Amount	Receivables on account of shares		Additional paid-in capital	Accumulated deficit		Total shareholders’ equity (deficiency)
Balance as of January 1, 2017	16,338,257	45	—		114,707	(106,492	)	8,260
Share-based compensation to employees and non-employees	—	—	—		3,654	—		3,654
Issuance of ordinary shares upon exercise of options to purchase ordinary shares and RSUs by employees and non-employees	166,748	1	—		37	—		38
Issuance of ordinary shares in at-the-market offering, net of issuance expenses in the amount of $467	5,613,084	16	—		9,293	—		9,309
Issuance of ordinary shares in follow-on public offering, net of issuance expenses in an amount of $1,117	7,885,550	22	—		7,141	—		7,163
Cumulative effect to stock based compensation from adoption of a new accounting standard	—	—	—		11	(11	)	—
Net loss	—	—	—		—	(24,717	)	(24,717	)

Balance as of December 31, 2017	30,003,639	84	—		134,843	(131,220	)	3,707
Cumulative effect to retained earning from adoption of a new accounting standard	—	—	—		—	(23	)	(23	)
Share-based compensation to employees and non-employees	—	—	—		796	—		796
Issuance of ordinary shares upon exercise of options to purchase ordinary shares and RSUs by employees and non-employees	117,416	*)	—		—	—		—
Issuance of ordinary shares in at-the-market offering, net of issuance expenses in the amount of $50 (1)	389,400	2	(42	)	388	—		348
Net loss	—	—	—		—	(6,327	)	(6,327	)
Balance as of March 31, 2018	30,510,455	86	(42	)	136,027	(137,570	)	(1,499	)



*)	Represents an amount lower than $1.
(1)	See Note ~~8b to the condensed consolidated financial statements~~
~~(2)~~	~~See Note 8e~~7e to the condensed consolidated financial statements

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these ~~condensed~~ consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

REWALK ROBOTICS LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

(In thousands)


	Nine Months Ended September 30,						Three Months Ended March 31,
	2017			2016			2018			2017
Cash flows from operating activities:
Cash flows used in operating activities:
Net loss	$	(18,555	)	$	(23,959	)	$	(6,327	)	$	(6,400	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:

Depreciation	516			503			113			180
Share-based compensation to employees and non- employees	2,597			2,458			796			851
Deferred taxes	(20		)	(64		)	(14		)	(47		)
Loss on extinguishment of debt	313			—
Financial expenses related to long term loan	87			495			—			33

Changes in assets and liabilities:

Trade receivables, net	(11		)	1,202			(433		)	(147		)
Prepaid expenses and other current and long term assets	(556		)	(804		)
Prepaid expenses and other assets							180			(204		)
Inventories	(381		)	(1,004		)	134			188
Trade payables	(1,048		)	960			409			(438		)
Employees and payroll accruals	(161		)	(285		)	54			(313		)
Deferred revenues and advances from customers	45			116			74			127
Other current and long term liabilities	102			182
Other liabilities							(12		)	141
Net cash used in operating activities	(17,072		)	(20,200		)	(5,026		)	(6,029		)

Cash flows from investing activities:
Cash flows used in investing activities:
Purchase of property and equipment	(19		)	(408		)	—			(10		)
Net cash used in investing activities	(19		)	(408		)	—			(10		)

Cash flows from financing activities:
Issuance of ordinary shares upon exercise of options to purchase ordinary shares by employees and non-employees	28			23
Proceeds from long term loan	—			12,000
Debt issuance cost	—			(441		)
Cash flows used in financing activities:
Issuance of ordinary shares upon exercise of stock options by employees and non employees							—			20
Repayment of long term loan	(2,747		)	(554		)	(1,115		)	(1,168		)
Issuance of ordinary shares in at-the-market offering, net of issuance expenses paid in the amount of $389 (1)	9,060			4,110
Net cash provided by financing activities	6,341			15,138
Issuance of ordinary shares in at-the-market offering, net of issuance expenses paid in the amount of $12 (1)							386			658
Net cash used in financing activities							(729		)	(490		)

Decrease in cash and cash equivalents	(10,750		)	(5,470		)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	23,678			17,869
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	12,928		$	12,399
Decrease in cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash							(5,755		)	(6,529		)
Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash at beginning of period							15,423			24,498
Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash at end of period							$	9,668		$	17,969

Supplemental disclosures of non-cash flow information
Proceeds on account of ordinary shares in at-the-market offering not yet received							$	(42	)	$	—
At-the-market offering expenses not yet paid	$	50		$	11		$	38		$	47
Private placement issuance cost not yet paid (2)							$	615		$	—
Classification of inventory to property and equipment, net	$	145		$	113		$	29		$	29

Supplemental cash flow information:
Cash and cash equivalents							$	8,818		$	17,128
Restricted cash included in other long term assets							850			841
Total Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash							$	9,668		$	17,969

(1) See Note 8e7e to the condensed consolidated financial statements.

(2) See Note 10b to the condensed consolidated financial statements

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these ~~condensed~~ consolidated financial statements.

REWALK ROBOTICS LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

NOTE 1:- GENERAL


a.	ReWalk Robotics Ltd. (“RRL”, and together with its subsidiaries, the “Company”) was incorporated under the laws of the State of Israel on June 20, 2001 and commenced operations on the same date.


b.	RRL has two wholly-owned subsidiaries: (i) ReWalk Robotics Inc., (“RRI”) incorporated under the laws of Delaware on February 15, ~~2012;~~2012 and (ii) ReWalk Robotics GMBH. (“RRG”) incorporated under the laws of Germany on January 14, 2013.

The Company is designing, developing and commercializing the ReWalk system, an innovative exoskeleton that allow wheelchair-bound persons with mobility impairments or other medical conditions to stand and walk once again. The ReWalk system consists of a light wearable brace support suit which integrates motors at the joints, rechargeable batteries, an array of sensors and a computer-based control system to power knee and hip movement. There are currently two types of products: ReWalk Personal and ReWalk Rehabilitation. ReWalk Personal is designed for everyday use by individuals at home and in their communities and is custom-fitted for each user. ReWalk Rehabilitation is designed for the clinical rehabilitation environment where it provides individuals access to valuable exercise and therapy. It also enables individuals to evaluate their capacity for using ReWalk Personal system in the future.

The Company markets and sells its products directly to institutions and individuals and through third-party distributors. The Company sells its products directly primarily in Germany and the United States, and primarily through distributors in other markets. In its direct markets, the Company has established relationships with rehabilitation centers and the spinal cord injury community, and in its indirect markets, the Company’s distributors maintain these relationships. RRI markets and sells products mainly in the United States and Canada. RRG sell the Company’s products mainly in Germany and Europe.

During the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2017,~~March 31, 2018, the Company issued and sold ~~5,379,908~~389,400 ordinary shares at an average price of ~~$1.76~~$1.13 per share under its $25 million ATM Offering Program (as defined in Note ~~8e)~~7e below). The gross proceeds to the Company were ~~$9.4 million,~~$440 thousand, and the net aggregate proceeds after deducting commissions, fees and offering expenses in the amount of ~~$439~~$50 thousand were ~~$9.0 million.~~$390 thousand. As a result, from the inception of the ATM Offering Program in May 2016 until ~~September 30, 2017,~~March 31, 2018, the Company has issued and sold ~~6,071,970~~6,694,546 ordinary shares at an average price of ~~$2.31~~$2.21 per share under its ATM Offering Program, with gross proceeds of ~~$14.0~~$14.8 million, and net aggregate proceeds of ~~$13.1~~$13.8 million after deducting commissions, fees and offering expenses in the amount of ~~$907~~$948 thousand. The Company ~~may~~could raise up to ~~$25~~a remaining $10.2 million under its ATM Offering Program, ~~pursuant~~subject to ~~the terms of its agreement with the~~a limitation on sales agent. However, due to limitations under the rules of Form S-3, which have applied to the Company since it filed its annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 on February 17, 2017, taking into account ordinary shares issued~~and settled~~ under the Company’s ~~ATM Offering Program since February 17, 2017, as of September 30, 2017, the Company may issue up to $4.3 million in primary offerings under its~~ effective ~~shelf registration statement on~~ Form S-3 ~~(File No. 333- 209833) (the “Form S-3”), including its ATM Offering Program,~~limiting sales under such Form S-3 to $13.7 million during ~~the 12 months following February 17, 2017, unless and until it is no longer subject to such limitations.~~any 12-month period. See Note 8e7e below for more information about the Company’s ATM Offering ~~Program and the related limitations under its Form S-3.~~Program.


d.	The Company depends on one contract manufacturer. Reliance on this vendor makes the Company vulnerable to possible capacity constraints and reduced control over component availability, delivery schedules, manufacturing yields and costs. This vendor accounted for 0% and 12% of the Company's total trade payables as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.

On January 9, 2017, the Company announced its plan to reduce total operating expenses in 2017 by up to 30% as compared to 2016. The Company has been working toward such reductions through a combination of targeted savings, including by establishing quality improvement initiatives and lowering overall product cost, realigning the Company’s staffing priorities and reducing the size of its staff, including its reimbursement personnel, reducing spending on external appeals, and lowering other corporate spending.

The Company ~~had~~has an accumulated deficit in the total amount of ~~$125.1~~$137.6 million as of ~~September 30, 2017~~March 31, 2018 and further losses are anticipated in the development of its business. Those factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon the Company obtaining the necessary financing to meet its obligations and repay its liabilities arising from normal business operations when they become due.

The ~~condensed~~ consolidated financial statements for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2017~~March 31, 2018 do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and classification of liabilities that may result from uncertainty related to the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

REWALK ROBOTICS LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

NOTE 2:- UNAUDITED INTERIM CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The accompanying unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board for interim financial information. Accordingly, they do not include all the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles in the United States for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, the accompanying financial statements include all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation of the Company's (i) consolidated financial position as of ~~September 30, 2017,~~March 31, 2018, (ii) consolidated results of operations for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2017~~March 31, 2018 and (iii) consolidated cash flows for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2017.~~March 31, 2018. The results for the three ~~and nine~~ months periods ended ~~September 30, 2017,~~March 31, 2018, as applicable, are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2017.

NOTE 3:- SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The significant accounting policies applied in the audited consolidated financial statements of the Company as disclosed in the Company's annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2016~~2017 filed with the SEC on ~~February 17, 2017, as amended on Form 10-K/A filed with the SEC on April 27, 2017 (the “2016 Form 10-K”),~~March 8, 2018, are applied consistently in these unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial ~~statements.~~statements, except the below:


b.	~~Recent Accounting Pronouncements:~~Revenue Recognition

~~Recently Implemented Accounting Pronouncements~~
The Company generate revenues from sales of products. The Company sells its products directly to end customers and through distributors. The Company sells its products to private individuals (who finance the purchases by themselves, through fundraising or reimbursement coverage from insurance companies), rehabilitation facilities and distributors.

~~Inventory~~ -On January 1, 2018, we adopted Topic 606 using the modified retrospective method for contracts that were not completed as of January 1, 2018. Under the modified retrospective method, we recognized the cumulative effect of initially applying the new revenue standard as an adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings. This adjustment did not have a material impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements. Results for reporting periods beginning after January 1, 2018 are presented under Topic 606, while prior period amounts are not adjusted and continue to be reported in accordance with our historic accounting under Revenue Recognition ("Topic 605").

The adoption of Topic 606 represents a change in accounting principle that will provide financial statement readers with enhanced revenue recognition disclosures. In ~~July 2015,~~accordance with Topic 606, revenue is recognized when obligations under the ~~Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2015-11, “Simplifying~~terms of a contract with our customer are satisfied; generally this occurs with the ~~Measurement~~transfer of ~~Inventory.”~~control of our products or services. Revenue is measured as the amount of consideration to which we expect to be entitled in exchange for transferring products or providing services. To achieve this core principle, the Company applies the following five steps:

1. Identify the contract with a customer

A contract with a customer exists when (i) the Company enters into a written agreement with a customer that defines each party's rights regarding the products or services to be transferred and identifies the payment terms related to these products or services, (ii) both parties to the contract are committed to perform their respective obligations, (iii) the contract has commercial substance, and (iv) the Company determines that collection of substantially all consideration for products or services that are transferred is probable based on the customer's intent and ability to pay the promised consideration. The ~~standard changes~~Company applies judgment in determining the ~~inventory valuation method~~customer's ability and intention to pay, which is based on a variety of factors including the customer's payment history or, in the case of a new customer, published credit and financial information pertaining to the customer.

REWALK ROBOTICS LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

2. Identify the performance obligations in the contract

Performance obligations promised in a contract are identified based on the products or services that will be transferred to the customer that are both capable of being distinct, whereby the customer can benefit from the ~~lower~~product or service either on its own or together with other resources that are readily available from the Company, and are distinct in the context of ~~cost~~the contract, whereby the transfer of the products or ~~market~~services is separately identifiable from other promises in the contract.

3. Determine the transaction price

The transaction price is determined based on the consideration to which the Company will be entitled in exchange for transferring products or services to the ~~lower of cost or net realizable value for inventory valued under~~customer. To the ~~first-in, first-out or average cost methods. This standard~~extent the transaction price is ~~effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods and requires prospective adoption with early adoption permitted. The update was effective for~~variable, revenue is recognized at an amount equal the consideration to which the Company ~~beginning January 1, 2017. The~~expects to be entitled. This estimate includes customer sales incentives which are accounted for as a reduction to revenue and estimated using either the expected value method or the most likely amount method, depending on the nature of the program.

As a result of the Company's adoption of this standard, ~~did not materially impact~~ the ~~Company's financial statements.~~

~~Deferred Taxes~~ ~~- In November 2015,~~majority of the ~~FASB issued ASU 2015-17, “Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes", which simplifies the presentation of deferred income taxes. ASU 2015-17 provides presentation requirements~~amounts that were historically classified as bad debt expense, primarily related to classify deferred tax assets and liabilities, along with any related valuation allowance, as noncurrent on the balance sheet. The standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within that reporting period. The Company elected to implement this ASU-2015-17 prospectively. The update was effective forself-payers customers, are now considered an implicit price concession in determining net revenue. Accordingly, the Company ~~beginning January 1, 2017. The adoption~~recognized uncollectible balances associated with self-payers customers as a reduction of ~~this standard did not materially impact the Company's financial statements.~~

~~Recent Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted~~

~~Revenues~~ - In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) (“ASU 2014-09”), which provides a single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and will supersede most current revenue recognition guidance, including industry-specific guidance. The core principle is that an entity will recognize revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers in an amount that the entity expects to be entitled to in exchange for those goods or services. The standard provides a five-step model to determine when and how revenue is recognized. Other major provisions of the standard include capitalization of certain contract costs, consideration of time value of money in the transaction price and ~~allowing estimates~~therefore as a reduction in net revenues when historically these amounts were classified as bad debt expense within general and administrative expenses.

Shipping and handling costs charged to customers are included in net sales. Determining the transaction price requires significant judgment, which is discussed by revenue category in further detail below.

In practice, we do not offer extended payment terms beyond one year to customers. As such, we do not adjust our consideration for financing arrangements.

4. Allocate the transaction price to performance obligations in the contract

If the contract contains a single performance obligation, the entire transaction price is allocated to the single performance obligation. Contracts that contain multiple performance obligations require an allocation of the transaction price to each performance obligation based on a relative standalone selling price basis unless a portion of the variable consideration related to the contract is allocated entirely to a performance obligation. The Company determines standalone selling price based on the price at which the performance obligation is sold separately.

5. Recognize revenue when or as the Company satisfies a performance obligation

The Company generally satisfies performance obligations at a point in time, once the customer has obtained the legal title to the items purchased or service provided.

For systems sold to rehabilitation facilities, the Company includes training and considers the elements in the arrangement to be a single performance obligation. In accordance with ASC 606, the Company has concluded that the training is essential to the functionality of the Company’s systems. Therefore the Company recognizes revenue for the system and training only after delivery in accordance with the agreement delivery terms to the customer and after the training has been completed.

For sales of Personal systems to end users, and for sales of Personal or Rehabilitation systems to third party distributors, the Company does not provide training to the end user as this training is completed by the Rehabilitation centers or by the distributor that have previously completed the ReWalk Training program. Therefore the Company recognizes revenue in such sales upon delivery.

Revenue is recognized ~~before contingencies~~based on the transaction price at the time the related performance obligation is satisfied by transferring a promised product or service to a customer.

REWALK ROBOTICS LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

The Company generally does not grant a right of return for its products. There have been a few occasions in which the Company experienced a return of its products. Therefore, the Company records reductions to revenue for expected future product returns based on the Company’s historical experience.

Disaggregation of Revenues



	March 31,		March 31,
	2018		2017
Units placed	$	1,528	$	2,443
Spare parts and warranties	51		56
Total Revenues	$	1,579	$	2,499

Units placed

We currently offer two products: ReWalk Personal and ReWalk Rehabilitation. ReWalk Personal is currently designed for everyday use by paraplegic individuals at home and in their communities, and is custom fitted for each user. ReWalk Rehabilitation is currently designed for use by paraplegia patients in the clinical rehabilitation environment, where it provides individuals access to valuable exercise and therapy. It also enables individuals to evaluate their capacity for using ReWalk Personal in the future.

Units placed includes revenue from sales of a ReWalk Personal or ReWalk Rehabilitation. We also offer a Rent-to-Purchase model in which we recognize revenue according to the agreed rental monthly fee. For units placed, we transfer control and recognize a sale or a rental revenue when title has passed to our customer. Each unit placed is considered an independent, unbundled performance obligation.

Spare parts and warranties

Spare parts are ~~resolved~~sold to private individuals, rehabilitation facilities and distributors. For spare part sales, we transfer control and recognize a sale when title has passed to our customer. Each part sold is considered an independent, unbundled performance obligation.

Warranties are classified as either assurance type or service type warranty. A warranty is considered an assurance type warranty if it provides the consumer with assurance that the product will function as intended for a limited period of time.

In the beginning of 2018, we updated our service policy to include a five- year warranty compared to a period of two years that were included in ~~certain circumstances.~~the past for parts and services. The ~~standard also requires enhanced disclosures regarding~~first two years are considered as assurance type warranty and the ~~nature, amount, timing and uncertainty~~additional period is considered an extended service arrangement, which is a service type warranty. An assurance type warranty is not accounted for as separate performance obligations under the revenue model. A service type warranty is either sold with a unit or separately for units for which the warranty has expired. Revenue is then recognized ratably over the life of ~~revenue and cash flows arising from an entity’s contracts with customers.~~the warranty.

Contract balances



	March 31,		December 31,
	2018		2017
Trade receivable, net	$	1,566	$	1,103
Deferred revenues (1)	$	459	$	385


(1)	$72 thousand of December 31, 2017 deferred revenues balance were recognized as revenues during the three months ended March 31, 2018.

REWALK ROBOTICS LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

The Company has applied the practical expedient allowed within the guidance ~~permits two methods of adoption:~~to expense sales commissions when incurred as the ~~full retrospective method, in which case the standard~~amortization period would be ~~applied to each prior reporting period presented and the cumulative effect~~for one year or less.

Typical timing of applying the standard would be recognized at the earliest period shown, or the modified retrospective transition method, in which case the cumulative effect of applying the standard would be recognized at the date of initial application.payment

The ~~Company has substantially completed its evaluation~~timing of ~~significant~~satisfaction of our performance obligations does not significantly vary from the typical timing of payment. Typical payment terms are based on payment terms as established in our contracts. For some contracts we may be entitled to receive an advance payment.

Transaction price allocated to remaining performance obligations

For the three months ended March 31, 2018, revenue recognized from performance obligations related to prior periods was not material.

Revenue expected to be recognized in any future year related to remaining performance obligations, excluding revenue pertaining to contracts that have an original expected duration of one year or less, contracts where revenue is recognized as invoiced and contracts with variable consideration related to undelivered performance obligations, is not material.

The Company’s unfilled performance obligations as of March 31, 2018 and the ~~review of its current accounting policies and practices~~estimated revenue expected to identify potential differences that would result from applying the requirements of the new standard to the Company’s revenue contracts. In addition, the Company is in the process of identifying the appropriate changes to business processes, systems and controls to support recognition and disclosure under the new standard.

While a final decision has not been made, the Company expects to adopt the new revenue standard in the first quarter of 2018 applying the modified retrospective transition method. The Company does not expect the adoption of the new revenue standard to have a material impact on the amount and timing of revenuebe recognized in the ~~Company's consolidated financial statements.~~future related to the service type warranty amounts to $459 thousand, which is fulfilled over 1-5 years.

~~Leases~~ - In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842). Under the new guidance, a lessee will be required to recognize assets and liabilities for all leases with lease terms of more than 12 months. Consistent with current generally accepted accounting principles, the recognition, measurement, and presentation of expenses and cash flows arising from a lease by a lessee primarily will depend on its classification as a finance or operating lease. This ASU requires additional disclosures. The standard is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018 and interim periods within those fiscal years. The ASU requires adoption based upon a modified retrospective transition approach. Early adoption is permitted. The Company has not yet determined whether it will elect early adoption and is currently evaluating the impact of the pending adoption of this ASU on the Company's consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

~~Statement of Cash Flow~~s - In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, “Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments.” The standard addresses several matters of diversity in practice in how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows including the presentation of debt extinguishment costs and distributions received from equity method investments. The standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods and allows for retrospective adoption with early adoption permitted. The Company has chosen not to adopt this standard early, and does not expect the adoption of the standard to have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

~~Statement of Cash Flows~~ - On November 17, 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force).” This ASU requires the statement of cash flows to explain the change during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. Therefore, amounts generally described as restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents are to be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning of period and end of period amounts shown on the statement of cash flows. ASU No. 2016-18 will be effective for the Company as of January 1, 2018. The Company does not expect the adoption of this ASU to have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

~~REWALK ROBOTICS LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)~~



c.		Recent Accounting Pronouncements:

Share Based Compensation - On May 10, 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-09, “Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718), Scope of Modification Accounting.” This ASU clarifies when changes to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award must be accounted for as modifications. Entities will apply the modification accounting guidance if the value, vesting conditions or classification of the award changes. They will have to make all of the disclosures about modifications that are required today, in addition to disclosing that compensation expense has not changed, to the extent applicable. The ASU also clarifies that a modification to an award could be significant and therefore require disclosure, even if modification accounting is not required. The Company adopted ASU ~~No.~~ 2017-09 ~~will be~~on January 1, 2018 and it did not have a material impact on its accounting and disclosures.

Cash Flows - In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, “Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments.” The standard addresses several matters of diversity in practice in how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows including the presentation of debt extinguishment costs and distributions received from equity method investments. The standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, ~~2017. Early~~2017, including interim periods and allows for retrospective adoption with early adoption permitted. The Company adopted ASU 2016-15 on January 1, 2018 and it did not have a material impact on its accounting and disclosures.

On November 17, 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force).” This ASU requires the statement of cash flows to explain the change during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. Therefore, amounts generally described as restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents are to be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning of period and end of period amounts shown on the statement of cash flows. The Company adopted ASU 2016-18 on January 1, 2018 and it did not have a material impact on its accounting and disclosures.

REWALK ROBOTICS LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

Recent Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted

Leases - In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases”, on the recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of leases for both parties to a contract (i.e., lessees and lessors). The new standard requires lessees to apply a dual approach, classifying leases as either finance or operating leases based on the principle of whether the lease is ~~permitted, including in any interim period~~effectively a financed purchase by the lessee. This classification will determine whether lease expense is recognized based on an effective interest method or on a straight line basis over the term of the lease, respectively. A lessee is also required to record a right-of-use asset and a lease liability for ~~which financial statements have not yet been issued~~all leases with a term of greater than 12 months regardless of their classification. Leases with a term of 12 months or ~~made available for issuance. The ASU~~less will be ~~applied prospectively~~accounted for in a manner similar to ~~awards modified~~the accounting under existing guidance for operating leases today. The new standard requires lessors to account for leases using an approach that is substantially equivalent to existing guidance for sales-type leases, direct financing leases and operating leases. ASC 842 supersedes the previous leases standard, ASC 840, "Leases". The guidance is effective for the interim and annual periods beginning on or after ~~the adoption date.~~December 15, 2018. The Company is currently evaluating the impact ~~of the pending adoption of this~~that ASU 2016-02 will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

Income Taxes-In March 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-05, “Income Taxes (Topic 740), amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118.” The ASU adds various SEC paragraphs pursuant to the issuance of the December 2017 SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118, Income Tax Accounting Implications of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (“SAB 118”), which was effective immediately. The SEC issued SAB 118 to address concerns about reporting entities’ ability to timely comply with the accounting requirements to recognize all of the effects of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act in the period of enactment. SAB 118 allows disclosure that timely determination of some or all of the income tax effects from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act are incomplete by the due date of the financial statements and if possible to provide a reasonable estimate. We have accounted for the tax effects of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act under the guidance of SAB 118, on a provisional basis. Our accounting for certain income tax effects is incomplete, but we have determined reasonable estimates for those effects and have recorded provisional amounts in our condensed consolidated financial statements as of March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017.


c.d.	Concentrations of Credit Risks:

Concentration of credit risk with respect to trade receivable is primarily limited to a customer to which the Company makes substantial sales. ~~One customer represented 12.7%~~



	March 31,		December 31,
	2018		2017
Customer A	33	%	*)
Customer B	*)		17	%
Customer C	*)		14	%
Customer D	*)		10	%

*) Less than 10%

The Company’s trade receivables are geographically diversified and 0%derived primarily from sales to customers in various countries, mainly in the United States and Europe. Concentration of ~~the Company's~~credit risk with respect to trade ~~receivable, net balance as~~receivables is limited by credit limits, ongoing credit evaluation and account monitoring procedures. The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of ~~September 30, 2017~~its distributors based upon a specific review of all significant outstanding invoices. The Company writes off receivables when they are deemed uncollectible and having exhausted all collection efforts. As of March 31, 2018 and December 31, ~~2016, respectively. A second customer represented 12.3% and 4.9% of the Company's~~2017 trade ~~receivable, net balance as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. Trade~~ receivables are presented net of allowance for doubtful accounts in the amount of $125 thousand and ~~$333 thousand, respectively and~~ net of sales return reserve of $105 thousand as of ~~September 30, 2017~~March 31, 2018 and December 31, ~~2016.~~2017.

REWALK ROBOTICS LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)


d.e.	Warranty provision

The Company ~~provides~~provided a two-year standard warranty for its ~~products.~~products, In the beginning of 2018 we updated our service policy for new devices sold to include five-year warranties. The Company determined that the first two years of warranty is an assurance-type warranty and records a provision for the estimated cost to repair or replace products under warranty at the time of sale. Factors that affect the Company’s warranty reserve include the number of units sold, historical and anticipated rates of warranty repairs and the cost per repair.

US Dollars in thousands
Balance at December 31, 2016 $ 498
Provision 311
Usage (275 )
Balance at September 30, 2017 $ 534

~~NOTE 4:- INVENTORY~~

~~The components of inventory are as follows (in thousands):~~

September 30, December 31,
2017 2016
Finished products 3,500
3,264
$ 3,500
$ 3,264



	US Dollars in thousands
Balance at December 31, 2017	$	488
Provision	58
Usage	(70		)
Balance at March 31, 2018	$	476

REWALK ROBOTICS LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

NOTE 4:- INVENTORY

The components of inventory are as follows (in thousands):



	March 31,		December 31,
	2018		2017
Finished products	$	3,480	$	3,643
	$	3,480	$	3,643

NOTE 5:- COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES


a.	Purchase commitments:

The Company has contractual obligations to purchase goods from its contract ~~manufacturer, Sanmina Corporation.~~manufacturer. Purchase obligations do not include contracts that may be canceled without penalty. As of ~~September 30, 2017,~~March 31, 2018, non-cancelable outstanding obligations amounted to approximately ~~$806~~$317 thousand.


b.	Lease commitment: the Company operates from leased facilities in Israel, the United States and Germany. These leases expire between 2018 and 2025 (the “lease agreements”).

The future minimum lease commitments of the Company and its subsidiaries under various non-cancelable operating lease agreements in respect of premises, that are in effect as of March 31, 2018, are as follows (in thousands):



2018	$	441
2019	586
2020	594
2021	593
2022	601
And Thereafter	1,106
Total	$	3,921

RRL and RRG lease cars for their employees under cancelable operating lease agreements expiring at various dates in between 2018 and 2020.

RRL and RRG have an option to be released from these agreements, which may result in penalties in a maximum amount of approximately $57 thousand as of March 31, 2018.


c.	Royalties:

The Company’s research and development efforts are financed, in part, through funding from the Israel Innovation Authority (the “IIA”) (formerly known as the Israeli Office of the Chief Scientist in the Israel Ministry of Economy). During the nine months ended September 30, 2017 the Company received $828 thousand from the IIA to fund its research and ~~development efforts.~~Israel-U.S. Binational Industrial Research and Development Foundation (the “BIRD”). Since the Company’s inception through ~~September 30, 2017,~~March 31, 2018, the Company received funding from the IIA and BIRD in the total amount of ~~$1.6 million.~~$1.97 million and $500 thousand, respectively. Out of the ~~$1.6~~$1.97 million in funding from the IIA, a total amount of ~~$1.2~~$1.57 million were royalty bearing grants (as of ~~September 30, 2017,~~March 31, 2018, the Company paid royalties to the IIA in the total amount of $50 thousand), while a total amount of $400 thousand was received in consideration of 5,237 convertible preferred A shares, which converted after our initial public offering in September 2014 into ordinary shares in a conversion ratio of 1 to 1. The Company is obligated to pay royalties to the IIA, amounting to 3%-3.5% of the sales of the products and other related revenues generated from such projects, up to 100% of the grants received. AsThe royalty payment obligations also bear interest at the LIBOR rate. The obligation to pay these royalties is contingent on actual sales of ~~September 30, 2017,~~ the ~~contingent liability~~applicable products and in the absence of such sales, no payment is required. The Company was obligated to pay royalties to BIRD amounting to 5% of the ~~IIA amounted~~sales of the products and other related revenues generated from such projects, up to ~~$1.1 million.~~

150% of the grants received. For the three months ended March 31, 2018 there were no royalties expenses recorded in cost of revenues.

REWALK ROBOTICS LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

As of March 31, 2018, the contingent liability to the IIA amounted to $1.5 million. The Israeli Research and Development Law provides that know-how developed under an approved research and development program may not be transferred to third parties without the approval of the IIA. Such approval is not required for the sale or export of any products resulting from such research or development. The IIA, under special circumstances, may approve the transfer of IIA-funded know-how outside Israel, in the following cases:

(a) the grant recipient pays to the IIA a portion of the sale price paid in consideration for such IIA-funded know-how or in consideration for the sale of the grant recipient itself, as the case may be, which portion will not exceed six times the amount of the grants received plus interest (or three times the amount of the grant received plus interest, in the event that the recipient of the know-how has committed to retain the research and development activities of the grant recipient in Israel after the transfer); (b) the grant recipient receives know-how from a third party in exchange for its IIA-funded know-how; (c) such transfer of IIA-funded know-how arises in connection with certain types of cooperation in research and development activities; or (d) if such transfer of know-how arises in connection with a liquidation by reason of insolvency or receivership of the grant recipient.


c.d.	Liens:

As discussed in Note 6 to ~~our~~the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements ~~included~~ in ~~the Company's~~its annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, ~~2016, filed with the SEC on February 17, 2017, as amended on Form 10-K/A filed with the SEC on April 27,~~ 2017 (the ~~“2016~~“2017 Form 10-K”), the Company is party to ~~the Loan Agreement~~a loan agreement, as amended (the “Loan Agreement”), with Kreos Capital V (Expert Fund) Limited (“Kreos”), pursuant to which Kreos extended a $20 million line of credit to the Company. In connection with the Loan Agreement, the Company granted Kreos a first priority security interest over all of its assets, including intellectual property and equity interests in its subsidiaries, subject to certain permitted security interests.

The Company's other long-term assets ~~which were~~ in the amount of $850 thousand ~~as of September 30, 2017,~~ have been pledged to third parties as a security in respect ~~of a guarantee granted~~ to ~~a third party~~lease agreements. Such deposit cannot be pledged to others or withdrawn without the consent of such third party.


d.	~~Legal Claims:~~

Legal Claims:

Occasionally the Company is involved in various claims, lawsuits, regulatory examinations, investigations and other legal matters arising, for the most part, in the ordinary course of business. The outcome of litigation and other legal matters is inherently uncertain. In making a determination regarding accruals, using available information, the Company evaluates the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome in legal or regulatory proceedings to which the Company is a party and records a loss contingency when it is probable a liability has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. Where the Company determines an unfavorable outcome is not probable or reasonably estimable, the Company does not accrue for any potential litigation loss. These subjective determinations are based on the status of such legal or regulatory proceedings, the merits of our defenses, and consultation with legal counsel. Actual outcomes of these legal and regulatory proceedings may materially differ from the Company’s current estimates. It is possible that resolution of one or more of the legal matters currently pending or threatened could result in losses material to the Company’s consolidated results of operations, liquidity or financial condition.

As set forth below, between September 2016 and January 2017, eight substantially similar putative securities class actions were filed against the Company. ~~Four~~As of March 31, 2018, four of these actions have been dismissed on procedural grounds, one was voluntarily dismissed and three are pending, including two actions which have been consolidated and one action brought by the plaintiffs whose actions were dismissed.

Dismissed Actions:

◦

~~On September 20, November 3, November 9, and November 10, 2016, respectively, four putative class actions on behalf of alleged shareholders that purchased or acquired the Company's~~

•On September 20, November 3, November 9, and November 10, 2016, respectively, four putative class actions on behalf of alleged shareholders that purchased or acquired the Company’s ordinary shares pursuant and/or traceable to the registration statement used in connection with the Company’s initial public offering (the “IPO”) were commenced in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Mateo. The actions were filed against the Company, certain of the Company’s current and former directors and officers, and the underwriters of the Company’s IPO. These actions are referred to the registration statement used in connection with the Company's IPO were commenced in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Mateo. The actions were filed against the Company, certain of the Company's current and former directors and officers, and the underwriters of the Company's IPO. We refer to these actions as the “California State Court Actions.” The complaints in the California State Court ~~Actions asserted various claims under the Securities Act. Each of the California State Court Actions was dismissed for lack of personal jurisdiction in January 2017.~~

◦

On January 24, 2017, a substantially similar class action was commenced in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California (Case No. 4:17-cv-362) against the same defendants as in the California State Court Actions plus certain additional defendants. This action is referred to as the “California Federal Court Action.” On March 23, 2017, this case was voluntarily dismissed.

~~Pending Actions:~~

◦

On or about October 31, 2016, a class action with claims substantially similar to the California State Court Actions was commenced in the Massachusetts Superior Court, Suffolk County, by a different plaintiff (Civ. Action No. 16-3336), alleging claims under Section 11 of the Securities Act against the Company, certain of the Company's current and former directors and officers, and the underwriters of the Company's IPO, and alleging claims under Section 15 of the Securities Act against the Company and certain of the Company's current and former directors and officers.

REWALK ROBOTICS LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

◦

On or about November 30, 2016, a substantially similar class action was commenced in the Massachusetts Superior Court, Suffolk County, by a different plaintiff (Civ. Action No. 16-3670) alleging claims under Sections 11 and 15 of the Securities Act against the same defendants as in the action commenced on October 31, 2016, and also alleging claims under Section 12(a)(2) of the Securities Act against the Company, certain of the Company's current and former directors and officers, and the underwriters of the Company's IPO. This action was ordered consolidated in the Massachusetts Superior Court, Suffolk County on January 9, 2017 with the action commenced on October 31, 2016, and the two actions are referred to as the “Consolidated Massachusetts State Court Actions”. The plaintiffs in the Consolidated Massachusetts State Court Actions filed a consolidated amended complaint on March 20, 2017. The Company moved to dismiss the Consolidated Massachusetts State Court Actions on June 2, 2017. ~~For more information, see Note 11~~.

Actions asserted various claims under the Securities Act. Each of the California State Court Actions was dismissed for lack of personal jurisdiction in January 2017.

•On January 24, 2017, a substantially similar class action was commenced in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California (Case No. 4:17-cv-362) against the same defendants as in the California State Court Actions plus certain additional defendants. This action is referred to as the “California Federal Court Action.” On March 23, 2017, this case was voluntarily dismissed.

Pending Actions:

•On or about October 31, 2016, a class action with claims substantially similar to the California State Court Actions was commenced in the Massachusetts Superior Court, Suffolk County, by a different plaintiff (Civ. Action No. 16-3336), alleging claims under Section 11 of the Securities Act against the Company, certain of the Company’s current and former directors and officers, and the underwriters of the Company’s IPO, and alleging claims under Section 15 of the Securities Act against the Company and certain of the Company’s current and former directors and officers.

•On or about November 30, 2016, a substantially similar class action was commenced in the Massachusetts Superior Court, Suffolk County, by a different plaintiff (Civ. Action No. 16-3670) alleging claims under Sections 11 and 15 of the Securities Act against the same defendants as in the action commenced on October 31, 2016, and also alleging claims under Section 12(a)(2) of the Securities Act against the Company, certain of the Company’s current and former directors and officers, and the underwriters of the Company’s IPO. This action was ordered consolidated in the Massachusetts Superior Court, Suffolk County on January 9, 2017 with the action commenced on October 31, 2016, and the two actions are referred to as the “Consolidated Massachusetts State Court Actions.” The plaintiffs in the Consolidated Massachusetts State Court Actions filed a consolidated amended complaint on March 20, 2017. The Company moved to dismiss the Consolidated Massachusetts State Court Actions on June 2, 2017. On December 6, 2017, at a hearing to address the motion to dismiss of the non-U.S. defendants, the court, in light of the pending argument of the motion to dismiss in the Massachusetts Federal Court Action (as defined below), reconsidered its previous decision denying a stay and, subsequently entered an order staying the action.

•On or about January 31, 2017, a substantially similar class action was commenced in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts (Case No. 1:17-cv-10169) by four of the same plaintiffs who commenced the California State Court Actions, and two additional plaintiffs, alleging claims under Sections 11 and 12(a)(2) of the Securities Act against the Company, certain of the Company’s current and former directors and officers, and the underwriters of the Company’s IPO, and alleging claims under Section 15 of the Securities Act against certain of the Company’s current and former directors and officers. This action is referred to as the “Massachusetts Federal Court Action.” The plaintiffs in the Massachusetts Federal Court Action filed a consolidated amended complaint on August 9, 2017. The Company subsequently moved to dismiss. On January 19, 2018, the court held oral argument on the motion to dismiss. On February 23, 2018, the court entered an order denying the motion to dismiss for certain defendants only with respect to their motion seeking dismissal for failure to timely serve the complaint and indicated that it will address the substantive grounds for dismissal raised by all defendants at a later date.

◦

On or about January 31, 2017, a substantially similar class action was commenced in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts (Case No. 1:17-cv-10169) by four of the same plaintiffs who commenced the California State Court Actions, and two additional plaintiffs, alleging claims under Sections 11 and 12(a)(2) of the Securities Act against the Company, certain of the Company's current and former directors and officers, and the underwriters of the Company's IPO, and alleging claims under Section 15 of the Securities Act against certain of the Company's current and former directors and officers. This action is referred to as the “Massachusetts Federal Court Action.” On July 6, 2017, the Company moved to stay the Massachusetts Federal Court Action. The plaintiffs in the Massachusetts Federal Court Action filed a consolidated amended complaint on August 9, 2017. ~~For more information, see Note 11.~~

The complaints in all of the actions listed above allege that the ~~Company's~~Company’s registration statement used in connection with its IPO failed to disclose that the Company was unprepared or unable to comply with certain regulatory special controls and to provide the FDA with a postmarket surveillance study on the ~~Company's~~Company’s ReWalk Personal device, and that, as a result of such alleged omission, the plaintiffs suffered damages. The Massachusetts Federal Court Action also alleges that certain statements issued by the Company after its IPO are materially misleading because they omitted certain information. The Company believes that the allegations made in the complaints are without merit and intends to defend itself vigorously against the complaints relating to the three pending actions.

Based on information currently available and the early stage of the litigation, the Company is unable to reasonably estimate a possible loss or range of possible losses, if any, with regard to these lawsuits; therefore, no litigation reserve has been recorded in the Company's consolidated balance ~~sheet~~sheets as of ~~September 30, 2017.~~March 31, 2018. The Company will continue to evaluate information as it becomes known and will record an estimate for losses at the time or times when it is probable that a loss will be incurred and the amount of the loss is reasonably estimable.

REWALK ROBOTICS LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

NOTE 6:~~- LOAN AGREEMENT WITH KREOS AND RELATED WARRANT TO PURCHASE ORDINARY SHARES~~

On December 30, 2015, the Company entered into the loan agreement (the "Loan Agreement") with Kreos Capital V (Expert Fund) Limited ("Kreos"), pursuant to which Kreos extended a line of credit to the Company in the amount of $20 million. For more information, see Note 6 to our audited consolidated financial statements included in our 2016 Form 10-K.

On June 9, 2017, the Company and Kreos entered into the First Amendment of the Loan Agreement (the "Loan Amendment"). As of that date the outstanding principal amount under the Loan Agreement (the "Outstanding Principal Amount") was $17.2 million. Under the Loan Amendment $3 million of the Outstanding Principal Amount was extended by an additional 3 years with the same interest rate and became subject to repayment in accordance with, and subject to the terms of, a secured convertible promissory note (the "Kreos Convertible Note"). The Kreos Convertible Note may be converted into up to 2,523,660 ordinary shares of the Company at a fixed conversion price of $1.268 per share (subject to customary antidilution adjustments in connection with a share split, reverse share split, share dividend, combination, reclassification or otherwise), thus reducing the Outstanding Principal Amount by $3 million to $14.2 million. Kreos may convert the then-outstanding principal under the Kreos Convertible Note in whole or in part, in one or more occasions, at any time until the earlier of (i) the maturity date of June 9, 2020 or (ii) a "Change of Control", as defined in the Loan Agreement. In addition, at any time until the maturity date of June 9, 2020, Kreos has the right to convert the “end of loan payments” under the Loan Agreement, in whole or in part, into ordinary shares at a conversion price of $1.268 per share. Because the aggregate amount the Company drew down under the Loan Agreement equals $20 million and the total “end of loan payments” equal $200 thousand, Kreos has the right to convert up to 157,729 additional ordinary shares (subject to customary anti-dilution adjustments), making the total number of ordinary shares issuable upon conversion of the Kreos Convertible Note 2,523,660 (subject to customary anti-dilution adjustments).

The Outstanding Principal Amount under the Loan Agreement is not convertible and remains subject to repayment in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Loan Agreement, provided that such amount shall be repaid by the Company in accordance with an amended repayment schedule. The Company concluded that the exchange of the $3 million for the convertible promissory note is not a troubled debt restructuring under applicable accounting guidance because the lenders did not grant a concession. The modification was analyzed under ASC 470 ~~Debt~~ to determine if extinguishment accounting was applicable. Under ASC 470-50-40-10 a modification or an exchange that adds or eliminates a substantive conversion option as of the conversion date is always considered substantial and requires extinguishment accounting. Since this modification added a substantive conversion option, extinguishment accounting is applicable. The difference between the fair value of the new debt with the pre-modification carrying amount of the old debt represented a loss on extinguishment in the amount of $313 thousand.

According to the Loan Agreement the repayment period will be extended to 36 months if the Company raises $20 million or more in connection with the issuance of shares of its capital stock (including debt securities convertible into shares of the Company’s capital stock). As of June 30, 2017 the Company had raised more than $20 million and therefore the repayment period was extended by an additional 12 months to 36 months.

~~NOTE 7:~~- RESEARCH COLLABORATION AGREEMENT AND LICENSE AGREEMENT

On May 16, 2016, the Company entered into a Research Collaboration Agreement (“Collaboration Agreement”) and an Exclusive License Agreement (“License Agreement”) with Harvard.

Under the Collaboration Agreement, Harvard and the Company have agreed to collaborate on research regarding the development of lightweight “soft suit” exoskeleton system technologies for lower limb disabilities, which are intended to treat stroke, multiple sclerosis, mobility limitations for the elderly and other medical applications. The Company has committed to pay in quarterly installments for the funding of this research, subject to a minimum funding commitment under applicable circumstances. The Collaboration Agreement will expire on May 16, 2021.

Under the Harvard License Agreement, Harvard has granted the Company an exclusive, worldwide royalty-bearing license under certain patents of Harvard relating to lightweight “soft suit” exoskeleton system technologies for lower limb disabilities, a royalty-free license under certain related know-how and the option to obtain a license under certain inventions conceived under the joint research collaboration.

~~REWALK ROBOTICS LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)~~

The Harvard License Agreement requires the Company to pay Harvard an upfront fee, reimbursements for expenses that Harvard incurred in connection with the licensed patents, royalties on net sales and several milestone payments contingent upon the achievement of certain product development and commercialization milestones. The Harvard License Agreement will continue in full force and effect until the expiration of the last-to-expire valid claim of the licensed patents. As of ~~September 30, 2017,~~March 31, 2018, in light of the achievement of a milestone, the Company ~~did not achieve any of these milestones, and~~recorded a liability which is ~~evaluating~~included in the total expenses recorded during the three months ended March 31, 2018. The Company continues to evaluate the likelihood that ~~the~~other milestones will be achieved on a quarterly basis. Moreover, since such royalties are dependent on future product sales which are neither determinable nor reasonably estimable, these royalty payments are not recorded on the Company's condensed consolidated balance sheet as of ~~September 30, 2017.~~March 31, 2018.

The Company's total payment obligation under the Collaboration Agreement and the Harvard License Agreement is ~~$6.3~~$6.5 million, some of which is subject to a minimum funding commitment under applicable circumstances as indicated above.

The Company has recorded ~~expenses~~expense in the amount of ~~$465~~$530 thousand and $267 thousand during the three months period ended September 30, 2017 and September 30, 2016 respectively. The Company has recorded expenses in the amount of $1.2 million and $1.3 million during the nine months period ended September 30, 2017 and September 30, 2016 respectively. Those expenses arewhich is part of the total payment obligation indicated above, as research and development expenses related to the Harvard License Agreement and to the Collaboration ~~Agreement.~~Agreement for the three months ended March 31, 2018. No withholding tax was deducted from the Company's payments to Harvard in respect of the Collaboration Agreement and License Agreement since this is not taxable income in Israel in accordance with Section 170 of the Israel Income Tax Ordinance 1961-5721.

NOTE 8:7:- SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY



	a.	Share option plans:

As of ~~September 30, 2017,~~March 31, 2018, and December 31, ~~2016,~~2017, the Company had reserved ~~602,158~~2,451,983 and ~~380,153~~1,301,521 ordinary shares, respectively, for issuance to the Company’s and its affiliates’ respective employees, directors, officers and consultants pursuant to equity awards granted under the Company's 2014 Incentive Compensation Plan (the “2014 Plan”).

Options to purchase ordinary shares generally vest over four years, with certain options to non-employee directors vesting quarterly over one year. Any option that is forfeited or canceled before expiration becomes available for future grants under the 2014 Plan.

REWALK ROBOTICS LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

The Company did not grant options during the three month period ended March 31, 2017.

The fair value for options granted during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2017 and September 30, 2016~~March 31, 2018 was estimated at the date of the grant using a Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model with the following assumptions:

Nine Months Ended September 30,
2017 2016
Expected volatility 56% - 58% 53% - 60%
Risk-free rate 1.78% - 2.07% 1.16%-1.60%
Dividend yield —% —%
Expected term (in years) 5.31-6.11 5.31-6.11
Share price $1.3- $2.1 $6.8- $11.88



		Three Months Ended March 31,
		2018
Expected volatility		61%
Risk-free rate		2.74%
Dividend yield		—%
Expected term (in years)		6.11
Share price		$1.15

The fair value of restricted share units (“RSUs”) granted is determined based on the price of the Company's ordinary shares on the date of grant.

A summary of employee options to purchase ordinary shares and RSUs during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2017~~March 31, 2018 is as follows:

~~REWALK ROBOTICS LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)~~


	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017							Three Months Ended March 31, 2018
	Number		Average exercise price		Average remaining contractual life (in years) (1)	Aggregate intrinsic value (in thousands)		Number		Average exercise price		Average remaining contractual life (in years) (1)	Aggregate intrinsic value (in thousands)
Options and RSUs outstanding at the beginning of the period	2,251,014		$	6.47	7.80	$	1,740	1,846,797		$	1.86	6.33	$	586
Options granted	413,746		2.01					96,525		1.15
RSUs granted	230,484		—					17,857		—
Options exercised (2)	(30,192	)	1.39					—		—
RSUs vested (2)	(59,450	)	—					(97,575	)	—
RSUs forfeited	(44,196	)	—					(27,879	)	—
Options forfeited	(169,008	)	2.99					(36,820	)	10.38

Options and RSUs outstanding at the end of the period	2,592,398		$	5.39	7.45	$	578	1,798,905		$	1.76	6.28	$	517

Options exercisable at the end of the period	1,272,727		$	6.12	6.46	$	64	1,021,753		$	2.43	5.34	$	9


(1)	Calculation of weighted average remaining contractual term does not include RSUs, which have an indefinite contractual term.


(2)	During the ~~nine~~three months ~~period~~ ended ~~September 30, 2017,~~March 31, 2018, the aggregate number of ordinary shares that were issued pursuant to RSUs that became vested and options that were exercised on a net basis was ~~87,795~~96,962 ordinary shares.

The weighted average grant date fair value of options granted during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2017 and September 30, 2016~~March 31, 2018 was ~~$1.10 and $4.75, respectively.~~$0.675. The Company did not grant options during the three month period ended March 31, 2017. The weighted average grant date fair value of RSUs granted during the ~~nine~~three months ended March 31, 2018 was $1.15. The Company did not grant RSUs to any of its employees during the three month ~~period~~periods ended ~~September 30, 2017 and September 30, 2016 was $2.01 and $9.28, respectively.~~March 31, 2017.

The aggregate intrinsic value in the table above represents the total intrinsic value that would have been received by the option holders had all option holders that hold options with positive intrinsic value exercised their options on the last date of the exercise period. ~~Total~~No options were exercised during the three months ended March 31, 2018, and the total intrinsic value of options exercised for ~~each of~~ the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2017 ~~and September 30, 2016~~ was ~~$29 thousand and $844 thousand respectively.~~$25 thousand. As of ~~September 30, 2017,~~March 31, 2018, there were ~~$5.1~~$3.4 million

REWALK ROBOTICS LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

of total unrecognized compensation costs related to non-vested share-based compensation arrangements granted under the Company's 2012 Equity Incentive Plan and its 2014 Plan. This cost is expected to be recognized over a period of approximately ~~2.1~~1.8 years.

The number of options and RSUs outstanding as of ~~September 30, 2017~~March 31, 2018 is set forth below, with options separated by range of exercise price. ~~The below does not reflect the results of the Equity Exchange Program (as defined below) completed on October 5, 2017.~~

~~REWALK ROBOTICS LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)~~


Range of exercise price	Options and RSUs outstanding as of September 30, 2017	Weighted average remaining contractual life (years) (1)	Options exercisable as of September 30, 2017	Weighted average remaining contractual life (years) (1)	Options and RSUs outstanding as of March 31, 2018	Weighted average remaining contractual life (years) (1)	Options exercisable as of March 31, 2018	Weighted average remaining contractual life (years) (1)
RSUs only	353,437	—	—	—	461,474	—	—	—
$0.82	31,803	3.29	31,803	3.29	31,806	2.79	31,806	2.79
$1.32	335,095	4.75	330,095	4.67	426,617	5.45	330,092	4.15
$1.47 - $2.20	762,937	8.07	338,830	6.35
$1.48					755,761	6.71	554,608	5.81
$6.80- $8.99	663,382	8.09	322,536	7.96	90,443	7.54	74,209	7.54
$9.22- $10.98	201,343	8.42	75,586	8.10	15,358	7.39	14,608	7.37
$19.62-$20.97	244,401	7.17	173,877	7.15	17,446	6.69	16,430	6.68
	2,592,398	7.45	1,272,727	6.46	1,798,905	6.28	1,021,753	5.34


(1)	Calculation of weighted average remaining contractual term does not include the RSUs that were granted, which have an indefinite contractual term.

On September 6, 2017, the Company commenced a one-time equity award exchange program (the “Equity Exchange Program”), offering to certain eligible employees, executive officers and consultants the opportunity to cancel certain outstanding “underwater” stock options issued under the 2014 Plan, in exchange for the grant under such plan of a lesser number of RSUs. The Company's non-employee directors and retirees were not eligible to participate in the Equity Exchange Program. The Company conducted the Equity Exchange Program as a “value-for-value” exchange, pursuant to which the Company issued new RSUs with a value approximately equal to the value of the options that are surrendered, in accordance with the terms approved by the Company’s shareholders at the annual meeting of shareholders held on June 27, 2017. The primary purpose of the Equity Exchange Program was to restore the intended retention and incentive value of certain employee and consultant equity awards. Participation in the Equity Exchange Program was voluntary. The Company used the 52-week high closing price of its ordinary shares (as measured at the commencement of the Equity Exchange Program) as a threshold for options eligible to be exchanged. For more information on the results of the Equity Exchange Program, see Note 11.



	b.	Share-based awards to non-employee consultants:

The Company granted ~~3,454 options to a non-employee consultant on March 12, 2007, which were exercised during the nine months ended September 30, 2017. The Company granted 14,357~~20,454 fully vested RSUs during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2017~~March 31, 2018 to a non-employee ~~consultants.~~consultant. As of ~~September 30, 2017,~~March 31, 2018, there are no outstanding options or RSUs held by non-employee consultants.



	c.	Warrants to purchase ordinary shares:

The following table summarizes information about warrants outstanding and exercisable as of ~~September 30, 2017:~~March 31, 2018:



Issuance date	Warrants outstanding	Exercise price per warrant		Warrants exercisable	Contractual term
	(number)			(number)

July 14, 2014 (1)	403,804	$	10.08	403,804	July 13, 2018
December 30, 2015 (2)	119,295	$	9.64	119,295	See footnote (2)
November 1, 2016 (3)	2,437,500	$	4.75	2,437,500	November 1, 2021
December 28, 2016 (4)	47,717	$	9.64	47,717	See footnote (4)
	3,008,316			3,008,316

(1) Represents warrants to purchase ordinary shares at an exercise price of $10.08 per share, which were granted on July 14, 2014 as part of our series E investment round.

REWALK ROBOTICS LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

Issuance date Warrants outstanding Exercise
price
per warrant Warrants
exercisable Contractual term
(number) (number)

July 14, 2014 (1) 403,804
$ 10.08
403,804
July 13, 2018
December 30, 2015 (2) 119,295
$ 9.64
119,295
See footnote (2)
November 1, 2016 (3) 2,437,500
$ 4.75
2,437,500
November 1, 2021
December 28, 2016 (4) 47,717
$ 9.64
47,717
See footnote (4)
3,008,316
3,008,316

(2) Represents shares issuable upon the exercise of warrants to purchase ordinary shares at an exercise price of $9.64 per share, which were granted on December 31, 2015 to Kreos Capital V (Expert) Fund Limited, or Kreos, in connection with a loan made by Kreos to us and are currently exercisable (in whole or in part) until the earlier of (i) December 30, 2025 or (ii) immediately prior to the consummation of a merger, consolidation, or reorganization of us with or into, or the sale or license of all or substantially all the assets or shares of us to, any other entity or person, other than a wholly-owned subsidiary of us, excluding any transaction in which our shareholders prior to the transaction will hold more than 50% of the voting and economic rights of the surviving entity after the transaction. None of these warrants had been exercised as of March 31, 2018.


~~(1)~~	~~Represents warrants to purchase~~ (3) Represents warrants issued as part of our follow-on offering in November 2016. The exercise price and the number of ordinary shares ~~at an exercise price of $10.08 per share, which were granted on July 14, 2014 as part of our series E investment round.~~

~~(2)~~

Represents a warrant to purchase ordinary shares at an exercise price of $9.64 per share, which was issued on December 31, 2015 to Kreos, in connection with a loan made by Kreos to us. The warrant is currently exercisable (in whole or in part) until the earlier of (i) December 30, 2025 or (ii) immediately prior to the consummation of a merger, consolidation, or reorganization of us with or into or the sale or license of all or substantially all the assets or shares of us to, any other entity or person, other than a wholly-owned subsidiary of us, excluding any transaction in which our shareholders prior to the transaction will hold more than 50% of the voting and economic rights of the surviving entity after the transaction. None of these warrants had been exercised as of September 30, 2017.


~~(3)~~	~~Represents warrants issued as part of our follow-on offering in November 2016.~~

~~(4)~~

~~Represents a warrant in the amount of 47,717 ordinary shares issued to Kreos as part of the $8.0 million drawdown under the Loan Agreement,~~ which the warrants may be exercised are subject to adjustment upon certain corporate events, including stock splits, reverse stock splits, combinations, stock dividends, recapitalizations, reorganizations and certain other events. Our board of directors may also determine to make such adjustments to the exercise price and number of ordinary shares to be issued upon exercise based on similar events, including the granting of stock appreciation rights, phantom stock rights or other rights with equity features. At any time, the board of directors may reduce the exercise price of the warrants to any amount and for any period of time it deems appropriate.

(4) Represents warrants to purchase 47,717 ordinary shares that were issued as part of the $8.0 million drawdown under the Loan Agreement that occurred on December 28, 2016. See footnote 2 ~~above~~ for exercisability terms.



	d.	Share-based compensation expense for employees and non-employees:

The Company recognized non-cash share-based compensation expense for both employees and non-employees

in the consolidated statements of operations ~~for the periods shown below~~ as follows (in thousands):

Nine Months Ended September 30,
2017 2016
Cost of revenues $ 57
$ 78
Research and development, net 344
398
Sales and marketing, net 585
606
General and administrative 1,611
1,376
Total $ 2,597
$ 2,458

~~REWALK ROBOTICS LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)~~



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2018		2017
Cost of revenues	$	4	$	28
Research and development, net	114		113
Sales and marketing, net	155		185
General and administrative	523		525
Total	$	796	$	851



	e.	At-the-market offering program:

On May 10, 2016, the Company entered into an equity distribution agreement (the “Equity Distribution Agreement”) with Piper Jaffray, pursuant to which it may offer and sell, from time to time, ordinary shares having an aggregate offering price of up to $25 million, through Piper Jaffray acting as its agent. As of March 31, 2018 the Company could raise up to a remaining $10.2 million under its ATM Offering Program, subject to a limitation on sales under the Company’s effective Form S-3 limiting sales under such Form S-3 to $13.7 million during any 12-month period. Subject to the terms and conditions of the Equity Distribution Agreement, Piper Jaffray will use its commercially reasonable efforts to sell on the Company’s behalf all of the ordinary shares requested to be sold by the Company, consistent with its normal trading and sales practices. Piper Jaffray may also act as principal in the sale of ordinary shares under the Equity Distribution Agreement. Sales may be made under the Company's registration statement on Form S-3, which was declared effective on May 9, 2016 (the “Form S-3”), in what may be deemed “at-the-market” equity offerings as defined in Rule 415 promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “ATM Offering Program”). Sales may be made directly on or through the NASDAQ Capital

Market, the existing trading market for the Company's ordinary shares, to or through a market maker other than on an exchange or otherwise, in negotiated transactions at market prices prevailing at the time of sale or at prices related to such prevailing market prices, and/or any other method permitted by law, including in privately negotiated transactions. Piper Jaffray is entitled to compensation at a fixed commission rate of 3.0% of the gross sales price per share sold through it as agent under the Equity Distribution Agreement. Where Piper Jaffray acts as principal in the sale of ordinary shares under the Equity Distribution Agreement, such rate of compensation will not apply, but in no event will the total compensation of Piper Jaffray, when combined with the reimbursement of Piper Jaffray for the out-of-pocket fees and

REWALK ROBOTICS LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

disbursements of its legal counsel, exceed 8.0% of the gross proceeds received from the sale of the ordinary shares. The Company is not required to sell any of its ordinary shares at any time.

The Company may raise up to $25 million under its ATM Offering Program pursuant to the terms of its agreement with the sales agent. However, due to limitations under the rules of Form S-3, which have applied to the Company since it filed its annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 on February 17, 2017, taking into account ordinary shares issued and settled under the Company’s ATM Offering Program since February 17, 2017, as of September 30, 2017, the Company may issue up to $4.3 million in primary offerings under its effective shelf registration statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333- 209833), including its ATM Offering Program, during the 12 months following February 17, 2017, unless and until it is no longer subject to such limitations.

During the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2017,~~March 31, 2018, the Company issued and sold ~~5,379,908~~389,400 ordinary shares at an average price of ~~$1.76~~$1.13 per share under its ATM Offering Program. The gross proceeds to the Company were ~~$9.4 million,~~$440 thousand, and the net aggregate proceeds after deducting commissions, fees and offering expenses in the amount of ~~$439~~$50 thousand were ~~$9.0 million.~~$390 thousand. As a result, from the inception of the ATM Offering Program in May 2016 until ~~September 30, 2017,~~March 31, 2018, the Company had sold ~~6,071,970~~6,694,546 ordinary shares under the ATM Offering Program for gross proceeds of ~~$14.0~~$14.8 million and net proceeds to the Company of ~~$13.1~~$13.8 million (after commissions, fees and expenses). Additionally, as of that date, the Company had paid Piper Jaffray compensation of ~~$420~~$444 thousand and had incurred total expenses of approximately ~~$907~~$948 thousand in connection with the ATM Offering Program.

NOTE 9:8:- FINANCIAL EXPENSES, NET

The components of financial expenses, net were as follows (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,						Three Months Ended March 31,
	2017			2016			2017			2016			2018			2017
Foreign currency transactions and other	$	(37	)	$	17		$	(113	)	$	60		$	(19	)	$	(19	)
Financial expenses related to loan agreement with Kreos	510			495			1,932			1,462			495			739
Bank commissions	6			5			24			28			9			11
Income related to hedging transactions	—			(9		)	—			(36		)
	$	479		$	508		$	1,843		$	1,514		$	485		$	731

REWALK ROBOTICS LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

NOTE ~~10:~~9:- GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION AND MAJOR CUSTOMER AND PRODUCT DATA

Summary information about geographic ~~areas~~:areas:

ASC 280, “Segment Reporting” establishes standards for reporting information about operating segments. Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing ~~the enterprise’s~~ performance. The Company manages its business on the basis of one reportable segment, and derives revenues from selling systems and services (see Note 1 for a brief description of the Company’s business). The ~~below~~following is a summary of revenues within geographic ~~areas (in thousands):~~ areas:


	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,				Three Months Ended March 31,
	2017		2016		2017		2016		2018		2017
Revenues based on customer’s location:
Revenues based on customer’s location :
Israel	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
United States	801		710		4,242		2,976		1,178		2,099
Europe	931		404		1,996		908		341		400
Asia-Pacific	—		286		—		394		2		—
Latin America									58		—
Total revenues	$	1,732	$	1,400	$	6,238	$	4,278	$	1,579	$	2,499


	September 30,		December 31,		March 31,		December 31,
	2017		2016		2018		2017
Long-lived assets by geographic region (*):
Israel	$	330	$	476	$	268	$	298
United States	361		565		300		342
Germany	215		217		188		200
	$	906	$	1,258	$	756	$	840

(*) Long-lived assets are comprised of property and equipment, net.

~~Major customer data as a percentage of total revenues (in thousands):~~

September 30, December 31,
2017 2016
Customer A 42.6 % 33.3 %



	March 31,		December 31,
	2018		2017
Major customer data as a percentage of total revenues:
Customer A	37.0	%	35.2	%

REWALK ROBOTICS LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

NOTE ~~11:~~10:- SUBSEQUENT EVENTS


a.	~~Legal claims: class action litigation (see Note 5d)~~

AsOn May 15, 2018, following the receipt of ~~November 1, 2017, there were three pending class action lawsuits against the Company and certain other defendants alleging claims~~shareholder approval under the ~~Securities Act in connection~~rules of The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (“Nasdaq”) and Israeli law, we closed the first tranche of the investment agreement, dated March 6, 2018, with the Company’s registration statement used in its IPO, including the Consolidated Massachusetts State Court Actions and the Massachusetts Federal Court Action. These actions are further described above in Note 5d.

~~Consolidated Massachusetts State Court Actions: The court heard oral argument on the Company's’ motion to dismiss on October 16, 2017.~~

~~Massachusetts Federal Court Action: The court denied the Company's motion to stay and has set the time for the Company's motion to dismiss to November 10, 2017.~~


b.	~~Share option plans: Equity Exchange Program (see Note 8a)~~

~~On the Equity Exchange Program’s expiration date of October 4, 2017, 46 holders tendered options to purchase an aggregate of 945,416~~Timwell, issuing 4,000,000 ordinary shares ~~representing 96.4%~~to Timwell for gross proceeds of ~~all options eligible for exchange,~~$5 million and net proceeds of $4.4 million after deducting offering expenses in the amount of $600 thousand. The table below shows, on ~~October 5, 2017,~~a pro forma basis, the Company granted to these holders an aggregate of 251,872 new RSUs. 180,167 of these new RSUs were granted to the Company’s executive officers and “named executive officers” (as defined in Item 402 of Regulation S-Kimpact of the ~~SEC). Unless~~first tranche closing on our condensed consolidated balance sheet as if the ~~Company’s compensation committee accelerates their vesting, the new RSUs vest over a three-year period, with one-third vesting~~transaction had occurred on the first anniversary of the date of grant and one-third vesting on each of the next two successive anniversaries. Additionally, the forfeiture terms of the new RSUs are substantially the same as those that apply generally to previously-granted RSUs granted under the 2014 Plan. The Equity Exchange Program is further described above in Note 8a.March 31, 2018:

~~The stock options exchanged pursuant to the Exchange Program were canceled and the ordinary shares underlying such options became available for issuance under the 2014 Plan.~~



	Pro Forma Balance Sheet as of March 31, 2018
	Actual			Adjustments		Pro Forma
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents	$	8,818		$	4,400	$	13,218
Trade receivable, net	1,566			—		1,566
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	2,018			—		2,018
Inventories	3,480			—		3,480
Total current assets	15,882			4,400		20,282
LONG-TERM ASSETS
Other long term assets	1,082			—		1,082
Property and equipment, net	756			—		756
Total long-term assets	1,838			—		1,838
Total assets	$	17,720		$	4,400	$	22,120

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIENCY)
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Current maturities of long term loan	$	6,441		—		$	6,441
Trade payables	2,873			—		2,873
Employees and payroll accruals	926			—		926
Deferred revenues and customers advances	129			—		129
Other current liabilities	428			—		428
Total current liabilities	10,797			—		10,797
LONG-TERM LIABILITIES
Long term loan, net of current maturities	7,796			—		7,796
Deferred revenues	330			—		330
Other long-term liabilities	296			—		296
Total long-term liabilities	8,422			—		8,422
Total liabilities	19,219			—		19,219

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES
Shareholders’ equity (deficiency):
Share capital
Ordinary shares NIS 0.01 par value- Authorized: 250,000,000 shares at March 31, 2018; Issued and outstanding: 30,510,455 shares at March 31, 2018.	86			11		97
Receivables on account of shares	(42		)	—		(42		)
Additional paid-in capital	136,027			4,389		140,416
Accumulated deficit	(137,570		)	—		(137,570		)
Total shareholders’ equity (deficiency)	(1,499		)	4,400		2,901
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity (deficiency)	$	17,720		$	4,400	$	22,120

Table of Contents

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operation should be read in conjunction with the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere in this quarterly report and with our audited consolidated financial statements included in our ~~2016~~2017 Form 10-K as filed with the SEC. In addition to historical condensed financial information, the following discussion contains forward-looking statements that reflect our plans, estimates and beliefs. Our actual results could differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements. For a discussion of factors that could cause or contribute to these differences, see “Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” below.

Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

In addition to historical information, this quarterly report on Form 10-Q (this “quarterly report”) contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and the safe harbor provisions of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, that are based on our management’s beliefs and assumptions and on information currently available to our management. Forward-looking statements include information concerning our possible or assumed future results of operations, business strategies, financing plans, competitive position, industry environment, potential growth opportunities, potential market opportunities and the effects of competition. Forward-looking statements may include projections regarding our future performance and, in some cases, can be identified by words like “anticipate,” “assume,” “believe,” “could,” “seek,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “plan,” “potential,” “predict,” “project,” “future,” “should,” “will,” “would” or similar expressions that convey uncertainty of future events or outcomes and the negatives of those terms. These statements may be found in this section of this quarterly report titled “Part I, Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and elsewhere in this quarterly report. These statements include, but are not limited to, statements regarding:

our expectations regarding future growth, including our ability to increase sales in our existing geographic markets, expand to new markets and achieve our planned expense reductions;

our management’s conclusion, ~~in the notes to our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included in this report and to our audited consolidated financial statements for fiscal 2016,~~ and our independent registered public accounting firm’s statement in its opinion relating to our ~~audited~~accompanying consolidated financial statements, ~~for fiscal 2016,~~ that there ~~are~~is a substantial ~~doubts~~doubt as to our ability to continue as a going concern;

our ability to comply with the continued listing requirements of the NASDAQ Capital Market and the risk that our ordinary shares will be delisted if we cannot do so;

our ability to maintain and grow our reputation and the market acceptance of our products;

our ability to achieve reimbursement from third-party payors for our products;

our expectations as to our clinical research program and clinical results;

our expectations as to the results of ~~and~~the Food and Drug Administration’s ~~(the "FDA"~~(“FDA”), potential

regulatory developments with respect to our mandatory 522 postmarket surveillance study;

the outcome of ongoing shareholder class action litigation relating to our ~~IPO;~~initial public offering (“IPO”);

our ability to repay our secured indebtedness;

our ability to improve our products and develop new products;

our ability to close periodic issuances of our ordinary shares to, and to form a joint venture in China with, Timwell;

the risk of substantial dilution resulting from the periodic issuances of our ordinary shares to Timwell;

the significant voting power and de facto voting control Timwell will acquire;

Table of Contents

our ability to maintain adequate protection of our intellectual property and to avoid violation of the intellectual property rights of others;

our ability to gain and maintain regulatory approvals;

our ability to secure capital from equity and debt financings in light of limitations under our effective registration statement on Form S-3,

the price range of our ordinary shares and conditions in the financial markets, and ~~that~~the risk that such financings may dilute our shareholders or restrict our business;

~~Table of Contents~~

our ability to use effectively the proceeds of ~~any~~our offerings of securities;

our ~~securities;~~ability to maintain relationships with existing customers and develop relationships with new customers;

the impact of the market price of our ordinary shares on the determination of whether we are a passive foreign investment company;

~~our ability to maintain relationships with existing customers and develop relationships with new customers.~~

~~our ability to comply with the continued listing requirements of the NASDAQ Capital Market and the risk that our ordinary shares will be delisted if we cannot do so;~~ and

our compliance with medical device reporting regulations to report adverse events involving our products and the potential impact of such adverse events on ~~our~~ReWalk’s ability to market and sell its ~~products.~~products

The preceding list is not intended to be an exhaustive list of all of our statements. The statements are based on our beliefs, assumptions and expectations of future performance, taking into account the information currently available to us. These statements are only predictions based upon our current expectations and projections about future events. There are important factors that could cause our actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to differ materially from the results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the ~~forward-looking~~ statements. In particular, you should consider the risks provided under “Part 1, Item 1A. Risk Factors” of our ~~2016~~2017 Form 10-K, and in other reports filed by us with the SEC.

You should not rely upon forward-looking statements as predictions of future events. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee that future results, levels of activity, performance and events and circumstances reflected in the forward-looking statements will be achieved or will occur.

Any forward looking statement in this quarterly report speaks only as of the date hereof. Except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise.

Table of Contents

Overview

We are an innovative medical device company that is designing, developing and commercializing exoskeletons that allow individuals with mobility impairments or other medical conditions the ability to stand and walk once again. We have developed and are continuing to commercialize ReWalk, an exoskeleton that uses our patented tilt-sensor technology and an onboard computer and motion sensors to drive motorized legs that power movement.

We currently derive revenue from selling the ReWalk Personal and ReWalk Rehabilitation exoskeleton devices that allow individuals with paraplegia the ability to stand and walk once again. ReWalk Personal is currently designed for everyday use by individuals at home and in their communities, and is custom-fitted for each user. ReWalk Rehabilitation is designed for the clinical rehabilitation environment where it provides valuable exercise and therapy. It also enables individuals to evaluate their capacity for using ReWalk Personal in the future.

Since obtaining CE mark clearance at the end of 2012 and FDA clearance in June 2014 we have continued to increase our focus on selling the Personal device through third party payors in the U.S. and Germany, and through distributors in other parts of the world. Additionally, we ~~have received regulatory approval to sell the ReWalk deice in other countries. In the future, we~~are developing and intend to ~~seek approval~~commercialize a lightweight soft suit exoskeleton, designed to support mobility for individuals suffering from ~~the applicable regulatory agencies in~~ other ~~jurisdictions where we seek to market ReWalk.~~lower limb disabilities such as stroke, multiple sclerosis, cerebral palsy, Parkinson's disease and elderly assistance.

We have in the past generated and in the future expect to generate revenues from a combination of third-party payors, self-payors, including private and government employers, and institutions. While a broad uniform policy of coverage and reimbursement by third-party commercial payors currently does not exist for electronic exoskeleton technologies such as ReWalk, we are pursuing various paths of reimbursement and support fundraising efforts by institutions and clinics. In December 2015, the Veterans' Administration (the “VA”) issued a national policy for the evaluation, training and procurement of ReWalk Personal exoskeleton systems for all qualifying veterans across the United States. The VA policy is the first national coverage policy in the United States for qualifying individuals who have suffered spinal cord injury. As of September 30, 2017, we had placed 16 units as part of the VA policy. We also regularly assist in litigation efforts by individuals bringing claims against national and regional insurers for reimbursement of the ReWalk device, and have received and expect to receive revenues from settlements or judgments paid to the insured users. Additionally, to date several private insurers in the United States and Europe have provided reimbursement for ReWalk in certain cases, and in September 2017, each of German insurer BARMER GEK ("Barmer") and national social accident insurance provider Deutsche Gesetzliche Unfallversicherung (“DGUV”), signed a confirmation and letter of agreement, respectively, regarding the provision of ReWalk systems for all qualifying beneficiaries.

~~Table~~ In February 2018, the head office of ~~Contents~~

~~We continue~~German statutory health insurance, or SHI, Spitzenverband (“GKV”) confirmed their decision to ~~engage with U.S. and European national and regional insurance~~list the ReWalk Personal 6.0 Exoskeleton System in the German Medical Device Directory. This decision means that ReWalk will be listed among all medical devices for compensation, which SHI providers including European workers’ compensation groups, to secure potential coverage policies based on supportive data and appeal rulings that have deemed exoskeleton devices a “medically necessary” standard of carecan procure for individuals with SCI. As part of this ongoing initiative, a large national insurance provider has requested additional information from us in order to continue to evaluate a change from its current non-coverage policy. We are also submitting data to two additional U.S. commercial groups for policy reviews.

In the future, we intend to pursue reimbursement coverage through the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (“CMS”). While we believe that a positive response from CMS may broaden coverage by private insurers, we cannot currently predict how long it would take for us to receive a decision from CMS. For more information, see “Part I. Item 1A. Risk Factors-Risks Related to Our Business and Our Industry-We may fail to secure or maintain adequate insurance coverage or reimbursement for ReWalk by third-party payors, including the VA, which risk may be heightened if insurers find ReWalk to be investigational or experimental or if new government regulations change existing reimbursement policies. Additionally, such coverage or reimbursement, even if maintained, may not produce revenues that are high enough to allow us to sell our products profitably” in our 2016 Form 10-K.

In early January 2017, we announced our plans to reduce our operating expenses in 2017 by up to 30% as compared to 2016. We have been working toward such reductions through a combination of targeted savings, including by establishing quality improvement initiatives and lowering overall product cost, realigning our staffing priorities and reducing the size of our staff, including our reimbursement personnel, reducing spending on external appeals and lowering other corporate spending. In the near future, we intend to continue focusing on our reimbursement efforts with our streamlined staffing by pursuing insurance claimsany approved beneficiary on a case-by-case ~~basis, managing claims through the review process and external appeals, and investing in efforts to expand coverage.~~

In June 2017, we unveiled our lightweight “soft suit” exoskeleton prototype, in anticipation of later clinical studies and commercialization of an initial indication designed for strokes, and in October 2017, we announced the start of pre-clinical testing on the Restore “soft suit” system for stroke patients. A prospective clinical trial with the Restore system is targeted to begin in early 2018, and we aim to commercialize the system for use by stroke patients in Europe in late 2018, followed by the United States in late 2018 or early 2019, subject to the timing and receipt of CE mark and FDA clearance, respectively. We have not yet applied for these clearances and intend to apply in mid-2018. Obtaining clearance could involve an extensive and time-consuming process and delay commercialization beyond our planned timetable, and we cannot make any assurances regarding the ultimate timing of FDA or CE mark clearance or commercialization of the products. For more information on the clearance processes, see “Part I, Item 1. Business-Government Regulation” in our 2016 Form 10-K. For more information on the Restore system, see our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on October 23, 2017.

We intend to focus our research and development efforts in the near term primarily on the Restore system for stroke patients and in the longer term on “soft suit” exoskeletons for additional indications affecting the ability to walk, including multiple sclerosis, cerebral palsy, Parkinson’s disease and elderly assistance, and the next generation of our current ReWalk device. We anticipate that the next generation of the ReWalk will be a structural exoskeleton similar to our existing ReWalk devices, but with a slimmer profile, lighter body and improved drive mechanism.basis.

We have incurred net losses and negative cash ~~flows~~flow from operations since ~~inception. We~~inception and anticipate ~~that~~ this ~~will~~to continue in the near ~~term as~~term. In 2018 we ~~plan~~will continue to evaluate spending to reduce where possible while continuing to focus ~~our~~ resources ~~mainly~~ on achieving commercial reimbursement ~~efforts, and efforts to expand~~ coverage ~~for the ReWalk system,~~decisions, commercialization activities, clinical studies including ~~our~~the FDA 522 postmarket study and the ~~development~~Restore clinical studies to support regulatory clearance and ~~commercialization efforts~~activities to commercialize the Restore device for ~~the lightweight “soft suit” exoskeleton to treat~~ stroke patients and development efforts for similar “soft suit” exoskeleton technology for other indications affecting the ability to walk. We are committed to maintaining optionality to ensure that we can operate our business without interruptions, enhance our product portfolio and pursue new markets. As such, from time to time, we have engaged and may in the future engage in strategic transactions designed to enhance shareholder value including, but not limited to, alliances, such as our strategic alliance with Yaskawa Electric Corporation, divestitures, private placements, salesfirst half of ~~our assets or business and joint ventures.~~2019.

~~Table of Contents~~

~~Third~~First Quarter ~~2017~~2018 Business Highlights

~~Revenues grew 24%~~On April 30, 2018, ReWalk shareholders approved a previously announced $20.0 million investment agreement with Timwell, a Hong Kong entity, at a price per share of $1.25.

We closed the first investment tranche for $5.0 million in proceeds, allowing parties to ~~$1.7 million~~begin preliminary steps to form joint venture with Timwell to develop, manufacture and ~~46% to $6.2 million for~~market ReWalk products in China;

ReWalk’s Restore clinical study in stroke patients began at the ~~three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, respectively, compared to revenues~~end of ~~$1.4 million and $4.3 million for~~March 2018, with the ~~three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively.~~

first patient using the device as part of the study;

We placed 1623 ReWalk devices during the quarter ended ~~September 30, 2017,~~March 31, 2018, of which 1014 were placed in the ~~Unites States, 3 were in our direct markets~~U.S., eight in Europe and ~~3 were~~one in other ~~markets.~~market;

~~We secured 7 favorable case by case~~In March 2018, the Italian Ministry of Labor and Social Policy's statutory insurance ~~reimbursement decisions.~~

~~We increased pending insurance claims to 218~~corporation, (“INAIL”), has put in ~~the U.S. and Germany, as of September 30, 2017, compared to 149 as of the end of the prior year period.~~

~~Barmer confirmed it~~place a coverage policy that will provide ~~ReWalk~~exoskeleton systems tofor all qualifying beneficiaries. ~~Barmer provides insurance coverage for nearly ten million people~~This policy, the first of its kind in ~~Germany, as a member of the German Statutory Health Insurance network~~Italy, will provide individuals with spinal cord injury access to obtain their own medical device so that they can stand and one of the most significant national insurers in the country. Exoskeletons will be provided to users that meet certain inclusion criteria and assessment by the German Health Insurance Medical Service (~~Medizinischer Dienst der Krankenversicherungen) before and after training. Barmer has already begun processing claims with users entering training for in-home use of an exoskeleton.~~

walk again.

~~Germany’s national social accident insurance provider, DGUV, signed a confirmation letter with ReWalk, stipulating that the DGUV's member payers, including the health insurance association~~ ~~Berufsgenossenschaft~~ (also known as BG) and state insurers, will approve the supply of exoskeleton systems for qualifying beneficiaries on a case-by-case basis. DGUV is comprised of 35 different insurers, which provide coverage for more than 70 million individuals in Germany. Per the agreement, eligible individuals will go to BG clinics for evaluation as a part of the procurement.

Completed critical design review processes and began the pre-clinical testing of the Restore lightweight soft-exosuit base design in preparation for the clinical study and commercialization of an initial indication designed for stroke patients.

Total operating expenses in the third quarter of 2017 were $6.1 million, compared with $7.7 million in the prior year period. The reduction in operating expenses reflected our initiatives to reduce spending, as announced earlier in 2017.

During the quarter ended September 30, 2017, we sold 1,678,288 shares generating total net proceeds to the Company of $2.9 million (after commissions, fees and expenses) under our ATM Offering Program. For more information, see Note 8e to our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements set forth in “Part I, Item 1. Financial Statements” above and “Liquidity and Capital Resources” below.

Table of Contents

Results of Operations for the Three ~~and Nine~~ Months Ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2018 and March 31, 2017 ~~and September 30, 2016~~

Our operating results for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2017,~~March 31, 2018, as compared to the same periods in ~~2016,~~2017, are presented below. The results set forth below are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected in future periods.


	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,						Three Months Ended March 31,
	2017			2016			2017			2016			2018			2017
													(in thousands, except per share data)
Statements of Operations Data:
Revenues	$	1,732		$	1,400		$	6,238		$	4,278		$	1,579		$	2,499
Cost of revenues	1,024			1,110			3,740			3,410			897			1,450

Gross profit	708			290			2,498			868			682			1,049

Operating expenses:
Research and development, net	1,618			1,968			4,433			6,737			2,151			1,430
Sales and marketing	2,637			3,774			8,643			10,577			2,336			3,133
General and administrative	1,805			1,951			5,796			5,960			2,037			2,141

Total operating expenses	6,060			7,693			18,872			23,274			6,524			6,704

Operating loss	(5,352		)	(7,403		)	(16,374		)	(22,406		)	(5,842		)	(5,655		)

Loss on extinguishment of debt	—			—			313			—
Financial expenses, net	479			508			1,843			1,514			485			731

Loss before income taxes	(5,831		)	(7,911		)	(18,530		)	(23,920		)	(6,327		)	(6,386		)
Income taxes	15			9			25			39			—			14

Net loss	$	(5,846	)	$	(7,920	)	$	(18,555	)	$	(23,959	)	$	(6,327	)	$	(6,400	)

Net loss per ordinary share, basic and diluted	$	(0.27	)	$	(0.62	)	$	(1.00	)	$	(1.92	)	$	(0.21	)	$	(0.39	)

Weighted average number of shares used in computing net loss per ordinary share, basic and diluted	21,660,757			12,759,887			18,463,444			12,495,433			30,049,293			16,455,257

Table of Contents

Three ~~and Nine~~ Months Ended ~~September 30, 2017~~March 31, 2018 Compared to Three ~~and Nine~~ Months Ended ~~September 30, 2016~~March 31, 2017

Revenues

Our revenues for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2018 and 2017 ~~and 2016~~ were as follows:


	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,				Three Months Ended March 31,
	2017		2016		2017		2016		2018	2017
	(in thousands, except unit amounts)				(in thousands, except unit amounts)				(in thousands, except unit amounts)
Personal units placed	15		20		81		75		22	36
Rehabilitation units placed	1		3		3		5		1	1
Total units placed	16		23		84		80		23	37
Personal unit revenues	$	1,707	$	1,250	$	6,033	$	3,929	$1,499	$2,423
Rehabilitation unit revenues	$	25	$	150	$	205	$	349	$80	$76
Revenues	$	1,732	$	1,400	$	6,238	$	4,278	$1,579	$2,499

Revenues ~~increased by $332~~decreased $920 thousand, or ~~24%~~37%, for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2017~~March 31, 2018 compared to the three months ended ~~September 30, 2016. Revenues increased by $2.0 million, or 46%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2016.~~March 31, 2017. The ~~increase in revenue was~~decrease is driven primarily ~~due to sales mix, including higher sales~~from a lower number of units sold to the VA for use in ~~an ongoing~~the VA's clinical ~~study, reaching, as of September 30, 2017, 60 units placed as part of the study since its inception in the fourth quarter of 2015, and an increase in the conversion of rental units into purchases.~~study.

In the future we expect our growth to be driven by sales of our ReWalk Personal device to third-party payors as we continue to focus our resources on broader commercial coverage policies with third-party ~~payors.~~payors as well as sales of the Restore device to rehabilitation institutes.

Gross Profit

Our gross profit for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2018 and 2017 ~~and 2016 were~~was as follows (in thousands):

Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30,
2017 2016 2017 2016
Gross profit $ 708
$ 290
$ 2,498
$ 868



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2018		2017
Gross profit	$	682	$	1,049

Gross profit ~~was 41%~~had remained flat at 43% of revenue for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2017,~~March 31, 2018 compared to ~~21% of revenue~~42% for the three months ended September 30, 2016. Gross profit was 40% of revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2017, compared to 20% of revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2016. The increase in gross profit was driven by sales mix, the increase in the conversion of rental units into purchases and lower product costs.March 31, 2017.

We expect our gross profit to gradually improve as we increase ~~revenue~~our sales volumes and ~~lower our unit~~decrease the product manufacturing costs, ~~through implementation of certain cost reduction projects and economies of scale~~ which may be partially offset by potential price ~~increase.~~increases.

Table of Contents

Research and Development Expenses

Our research and development expenses, net, for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2018 and 2017 ~~and 2016~~ were as follows (in thousands):

Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30,
2017 2016 2017 2016
Research and development expenses, net $ 1,618
$ 1,968
$ 4,433
$ 6,737

~~Table of Contents~~



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2018		2017
Research and development expenses, net	$	2,151	$	1,430

Research and development expenses, net, ~~decreased by $350~~increased $721 thousand, or ~~18%~~50%, for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2017~~March 31, 2018 compared to the three months ended ~~September 30, 2016.~~March 31, 2017. The ~~decrease in expenses~~increase is ~~primarily~~ attributable to ~~a grant received from~~increased costs associated with the ~~IIA, which were credited~~development of our ReWalk soft suit exoskeleton, increased expenses related to regulatory, quality and research and development expenses, and a decrease in personnel costs and personnel-related costs, partially offset by an increase in costs related to development of the Restore device. Additionally, Research and development expenses, net, decreased $2.3 million, or 34%,activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2016. The decrease in expenses is primarily attributable to a one-time charge of $1.1 million recorded in 2016 related to the Collaboration Agreement and License Agreement with Harvard, grants received from the IIA which were credited to research and development expenses, net during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and a decrease in personnel costs and personnel-related costs.our ReStore clinical study.

We intend to focus our research and development expenses in the near term primarily on the Restore system for stroke patients and in the longer term on a “soft suit” exoskeleton for additional indications affecting the ability to walk, including multiple sclerosis, cerebral palsy, Parkinson’s disease and elderly assistance and the next generation of our current ReWalk device.

Sales and Marketing Expenses

Our sales and marketing expenses for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2018 and 2017 ~~and 2016~~ were as follows (in thousands):

Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30,
2017 2016 2017 2016
Sales and marketing expenses $ 2,637
$ 3,774
$ 8,643
$ 10,577



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2018		2017
Sales and marketing expenses	$	2,336	$	3,133

Sales and marketing expenses decreased ~~$1.1 million,~~$797 thousand, or ~~30%~~25%, for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2017~~March 31, 2018 compared to the three months ended ~~September 30, 2016. Sales and marketing expenses decreased $1.9 million, or 18%, for the nine months ended September 30,~~March 31, 2017, ~~compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2016. The decrease is~~ driven by lower personnel and personnel-related costs and consulting expenses as result of ~~our~~ recent cost reduction efforts.

In the near term our sales and marketing expenses are expected to be driven by our commercialization efforts and reimbursement ~~efforts~~ for the ReWalk Personal device as we continue to pursue insurance claims on a case by case basis ~~manage claims through the review process and external appeals~~ and invest in efforts to expand coverage.

General and Administrative Expenses

Our general and administrative expenses for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2018 and 2017 ~~and 2016~~ were as follows (in thousands):

Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30,
2017 2016 2017 2016
General and administrative $ 1,805
$ 1,951
$ 5,796
$ 5,960



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2018		2017
General and administrative	$	2,037	$	2,141

General and administrative expenses decreased ~~$146~~$104 thousand, or 7%5%, for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2017~~March 31, 2018 compared to the three months ended ~~September 30, 2016. General and administrative expenses decreased $164~~March 31, 2017. The Company recorded a one-time charge of $200 thousand in the three months ended March 31, 2018 related to severance accrual for the ~~nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2016. The~~Company's former chief financial officer, offset with a decrease mainly in ~~expenses is primarily attributable to lower~~ professional ~~expenses and personnel-related costs.~~

~~Loss on Extinguishment of Debt~~

Loss on extinguishment of debt of $313 thousand for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 is due to amending of our debt under the Loan Agreement with Kreos, such that $3.0 million in principal is now subject to the Kreos Convertible Note. The entry into the Kreos Convertible Note, which decreased the outstanding principal amount under the Loan Agreement from $17.2 million to $14.2 million, resulted in extinguishment of debt accounting treatment.expenses.

Table of Contents

Financial Expenses, Net

Our financial expenses, net, for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2018 and 2017 ~~and 2016~~ were as follows (in thousands):

Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30,
2017 2016 2017 2016
Financial expenses, net $ 479
$ 508
$ 1,843
$ 1,514



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2018		2017
Financial expenses, net	$	485	$	731

Financial expenses, net, decreased ~~$29~~$246 thousand, or 6%34% for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2017~~March 31, 2018 compared to the three months ended ~~September 30, 2016. Financial expenses, net, increased $329 thousand, or 22% for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2016.~~March 31, 2017. This ~~increase with respect to the nine-month period~~decrease is attributable mainly to interest ~~expenses~~expense related to ~~our~~the Loan Agreement with Kreos.

Income Tax

Our income tax for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2018 and 2017 ~~and 2016~~ was as follows (in thousands):

Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30,
2017 2016 2017 2016
Income tax $ 15
$ 9
$ 25
$ 39



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2018		2017
Income tax	$	—	$	14

~~Income taxes increased $6 thousand for the three months ended September 30, 2017 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2016.~~ Income taxes decreased $14 thousand for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2017~~March 31, 2018 compared to the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2016.~~March 31, 2017.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with United States ~~GAAP.~~generally accepted accounting principles. The preparation of our financial statements requires us to make estimates, judgments and assumptions that can affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. We base our estimates, judgments and assumptions on historical experience and other factors that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Materially different results can occur as circumstances change and additional information becomes known. Besides the estimates identified above that are considered critical, we make many other accounting estimates in preparing our financial statements and related disclosures. See Note 2 to our audited consolidated financial statements included in our ~~2016~~2017 Form 10-K for a description of the significant accounting policies that we used to prepare our consolidated financial statements.

There have been no material changes to our critical accounting policies or our critical judgments from the information provided in “Part II, Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Critical Accounting Policies” of our ~~2016~~2017 Form 10-K except for the updates provided in ~~Note~~note 3b of our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements set forth in “Part I, Item 1. Financial Statements” of this quarterly report.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

See Note 3b to our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements set forth in “Part I, Item 1. Financial Statements” of this quarterly report for information regarding new accounting pronouncements.

Table of Contents

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Sources of Liquidity and Outlook

Since inception, we have funded our operations primarily through the sale of certain of our equity securities and convertible notes to investors in private placements, the sale of our ordinary shares in public offerings and the incurrence of bank debt.

As of ~~September 30, 2017,~~March 31, 2018, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of ~~$12.9~~$8.8 million. The Company ~~had~~has an accumulated deficit in the total amount of ~~$125~~$138 million as of ~~September 30, 2017~~March 31, 2018 and further losses are anticipated in the development of its business. Those factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon the Company obtaining the necessary financing to meet its obligations and repay its liabilities arising from normal business operations when they ~~become~~come due.

The Company intends to finance operating costs over the next twelve months with existing cash on hand, ~~reductions in~~reducing operating spend, issuances under the Company's ATM Offering Program, or other future issuances of equity and debt securities, including the private placement of ordinary shares to Timwell Corporation Limited, a Hong Kong entity, or through a combination of the foregoing. However, the Company will need to seek additional sources of financing if wethe Company require more funds than anticipated during the next 12 months or in later periods. For more information, see “Part II, Item 1A. Risk Factors-We may not have sufficient funds to meet certain future capital requirements or grow our business, and may need to take advantage of various forms of capital-raising transactions. Future equity or debt financings or strategic transactions may dilute our shareholders, disrupt our business or place us under restrictive covenants, while limitations under our registration statement on Form S-3 may make it more difficult for us to raise money in the public markets.”

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business. The condensed consolidated financial statements for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2017~~March 31, 2018 do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and classification of liabilities that may result from uncertainty related to the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

Our anticipated primary uses of cash are (i) sales, marketing and reimbursement expenses related to market development activities and broadening third-party payor coverage, and (ii) research and development costs related to, in the shorter term, our Restore device that will assist patients who had stroke, and, in the longer term, developing our ~~lightweight “soft suit” exoskeleton technology for various lower limb disabilities, including stroke~~next generation of ReWalk with design improvements and ~~other~~building upon our technological platform to address new medical indications ~~affecting~~that affect the ability to ~~walk.~~walk including cerebral palsy, Parkinson’s disease and elderly assistance. Our future cash requirements will depend on many factors, including our rate of revenue growth, the expansion of our sales and marketing activities, the timing and extent of our spending on research and development efforts ~~our sales and marketing activities~~ and international expansion. ~~In order to meet~~If our current estimates of revenue, expenses or capital or liquidity requirements change or are inaccurate, we may seek to sell additional equity or debt securities, arrange for additional bank debt financing or refinance our ~~indebtedness, sell or license our assets, or pursue strategic transactions, such as the sale of our business or all or substantially all of our assets.~~indebtedness. There can be no assurance that we will be able to raise such funds on acceptable terms. For more information, see “Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors-We have concluded that there are substantial doubts as to our ability to continue as a going concern.” in our ~~2016~~2017 Form 10-K and “We may not have sufficient funds to meet certain future capital requirements or grow our business, and may need to take advantage of various forms of capital-raising transactions. Future equity or debt financings may dilute our shareholders, disrupt our business or place us under restrictive covenants, while limitations under our Form S-3 may make it more difficult for us to raise money in the public markets” in “Part II, Item 1. Risk Factors” of this quarterly report.

~~Table of Contents~~

10-K.

Loan Agreement with Kreos and Related Warrant to Purchase Ordinary Shares

On December 30, 2015, we entered into ~~the Loan Agreement~~a loan agreement with Kreos (the “Loan Agreement”) pursuant to which Kreos extended a line of credit to us in the amount of ~~$20.0~~$20 million. On January 4, 2016, we drew down $12.0 million under the Loan Agreement. Under the terms of the Loan Agreement we were entitled to draw down up to an additional $8.0 million until December 31, 2016, if we raised $10.0 million or more in the issuance of shares of our capital stock (including debt convertible into shares of our capital stock) by December 31, 2016. On December 28, 2016, we drew down the remaining $8.0 million available under the Loan Agreement. Interest is payable monthly in arrears on any amounts drawn down at a rate of 10.75% per year from the applicable drawdown date through the date on which all principal is repaid. As of June 30, 2017, the Company raised more than $20 million in connection with the issuance of its share capital and therefore, in accordance with the terms of the Loan Agreement, the repayment period was extended from 24 months to 36 months. The principal was also reduced in connection with the issuance of the Kreos Convertible Note on June 9, 2017. Pursuant to the Loan Agreement, we paid Kreos a transaction fee equal to 1.0% of the total available amount of the line of credit upon the execution of the agreement and we will be required to pay Kreos an end of loan payment equal to 1.0% of the amount of each tranche drawn down upon the expiration of each such tranche. During the ~~nine months~~fiscal year ended ~~September 30,~~December 31, 2017 the Company paid $23 thousand of fees in connection with the Loan Agreement, compared to $501 thousand during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016. Pursuant to the Loan Agreement, we granted Kreos a first priority security interest over all of our assets, including intellectual property and equity interests in its subsidiaries, subject to certain permitted security interests.

Table of Contents

In connection with the $12.0 million drawdown under the Loan Agreement, we issued to Kreos the warrant to purchase up to 119,295 of our ordinary shares at an exercise price of $9.64 per share, which represented the average of the closing prices of our ordinary shares for the 30-day calendar period prior to the date of the issuance of the warrant, subject to adjustment as set forth in the warrant. In connection with the $8.0 million drawdown under the Loan Agreement on December 28, 2016, we increased the amount of the warrant from $1.15 million to $1.61 million, or by $460 thousand, such that the warrant represents the right to purchase up to 167,012 of our ordinary shares. The increase was based on the terms of the warrant, which provide that the amount of the warrant will be increased by 5.75% of any additional drawdowns. Subject to the terms of the warrant, the warrant is exercisable, in whole or in part, at any time prior to the earlier of (i) December 30, 2025, or (ii) immediately prior to the consummation of a merger, consolidation, or reorganization of us with or into, or the sale or license of all or substantially all our assets or shares to, any other entity or person, other than a wholly- owned subsidiary of us, excluding any transaction in which our shareholders prior to the transaction will hold more than 50% of the voting and economic rights of the surviving entity after the transaction.

On June 9, 2017, the Company and Kreos entered into the First Amendment. As of that date the outstanding principal amount under the Loan Agreement was $17.2 ~~million,~~million. Under the First Amendment, $3.0 million of the outstanding principal under the Loan Agreement is subject to repayment pursuant to the senior secured Kreos Convertible Note issued on June 9, 2017, thus reducing the outstanding principal amount under the Loan Agreement to $14.2 million as of June 9, 2017. This amended outstanding principal amount remains subject to repayment in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Loan Agreement and an amended repayment schedule. Interest on the Kreos Convertible Note is payable monthly in arrears at a rate of 10.75% per year.

Kreos may convert the then-outstanding principal and “end of loan payments” under the Kreos Convertible Note, in whole or in part, on one or more occasions, into up to 2,523,660 ordinary shares, at a conversion price per share equal to $1.268 per share (subject to customary anti-dilution adjustments) at any time until the earlier of (i) the maturity date of June 9, 2020 or (ii) a “Change of Control,” as defined in the Loan Agreement. ~~For more information, see Note 6~~

We may in the future choose to refinance up to a substantial portion of our ~~condensed consolidated financial statements~~ ~~included in “Part I, Item 1”~~remaining indebtedness under the Kreos Loan Agreement, including by tying our repayment obligations and amortization schedule to the achievement of ~~this quarterly report.~~certain business milestones, which we have considered with Kreos from time to time

Equity Raises

Our initial public offering in September 2014 generated $36.3 million in net proceeds. Additionally, on May 9, 2016, the SEC declared effective our Form S-3, pursuant to which we registered up to $100 million of ordinary shares, warrants and/or debt securities and up to 4,388,143 ordinary shares offered by selling shareholders named therein. On May 10, 2016, we entered into our Equity Distribution Agreement with Piper Jaffray, pursuant to which we may offer and sell, from time to time, ordinary shares having an aggregate offering price of up to $25.0 million through Piper Jaffray acting as our agent. The ordinary shares issued under the Equity Distribution Agreement may be registered under the Securities Act using our Form S-3.

Additionally, on November 1, 2016, we closed our follow-on public offering of 3,250,000 units, each consisting of one ordinary share and 0.75 of a warrant to purchase one ordinary share. The ordinary shares and the warrants underlying the units and the ordinary shares issuable upon exercise of the warrants are registered under the Securities Act on our Form S-3. The warrants became exercisable during the period commencing from the date of original issuance and ending on November 1, 2021, the expiration date of the warrants, at an initial exercise price of $4.75 per ordinary share. Our net aggregate proceeds, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated expenses, were $11.1 million. We also granted Oppenheimer & Co. (“Oppenheimer”), as underwriter under the underwriting agreement, an option to purchase up to 487,500 additional units at the public offering price, less the underwriting discount, for 30 days after October 27, 2016, which Oppenheimer did not exercise.

On November 21, 2017, we closed the base portion of our follow-on offering of 6,857,000 ordinary shares. Each ordinary share was sold to the public at a price of $1.05. On November 22, 2017, National Securities Corporation, as underwriter, exercised in full its option to purchase 1,028,550 additional ordinary shares at the public offering price of $1.05 per unit, less the underwriting discount. The Company's net aggregate proceeds of the base offering and over-allotment exercise, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and expenses, were $7.2 million.

Table of Contents

Since we filed our ~~2016~~ Form 10-K on February 17, 2017, we have been subject to limitations under the applicable rules of Form S-3, which constrain our ability to secure capital pursuant to our ATM Offering Program or other public offerings pursuant to our effective Form S-3. These rules limit the size of primary securities offerings conducted by issuers with ~~an aggregate market value of common stock held by nonaffiliated persons and entities (known as our “public float”)~~a public float of less than $75 million to no more than one-third of their public float in any 12-month period. ~~As of February 17, 2017, our public float was approximately $41.2 million, restricting the size of~~Pursuant to these rules, we may not sell in primary offerings under our Form S-3 tomore than approximately $13.7 million ~~for the following~~in any 12 ~~months,~~month period, unless and until we are no longer subject to these limitations. We will cease to be subject to these limitations once our public float exceeds $75 million. As of the date of this quarterly report, we have sold approximately $9.6 million in ~~which case we would reassess~~securities under our Form S-3 during the ~~application of these rules in 2018,~~last 12 months, when we ~~file~~were subject to these restrictions. We will also recalculate the amount of this limitation if we terminate our ~~annual report on~~ongoing takedown and conduct another takedown under our Form ~~10-K for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2017.~~S-3. Additionally, these limitations do not apply to secondary offerings for the resale of our ordinary shares or other securities by selling shareholders or to the issuance of ordinary shares upon conversion by holders of convertible securities, such as warrants. ~~Taking into account ordinary shares issued and settled under~~

With respect to our ATM Offering Program, because we have sold $14.8 million in the program since ~~February 17, 2017, as of September 30, 2017, our~~its inception, we could only raise up to a remaining ~~capacity for primary offerings under our Form S-3 during~~$10.2 million using the ~~12 months after February 17, 2017 was $4.3 million, assuming we remain~~program, subject to ~~such~~the $13.7 million limitation. Because of these limitations, ~~throughout that 12-month period.~~

Toto raise additional capital in securities offerings above that limitation, we may be required to seek other methods of completing primary offerings, including, for example, under a registration statement on Form S-1 (which has no such size limitations), the preparation of which would be more time-consuming and costly, including due to potential SEC review. We may also conduct such offerings in the form of private placements, potentially with registration rights or priced at a discount to the market value of our ordinary shares, which could require shareholder approval under the rules of the ~~NASDAQ.~~Nasdaq. Any such transactions could result in substantial dilution of shareholders’ interests.

ATM Offering Program

On May 10, 2016, we entered into our Equity Distribution Agreement with Piper Jaffray, pursuant to which we may offer and sell, from time to time, ordinary shares having an aggregate offering price of up to $25.0 million through Piper Jaffray acting as our agent. The $13.7 million on sales under our Form S-3 also applies to this ATM Offering Program. Subject to the terms and conditions of the Equity Distribution Agreement, Piper Jaffray will use its commercially reasonable efforts to sell on our behalf all of the ordinary shares requested to be sold by us, consistent with its normal trading and sales practices. Piper Jaffray may also act as principal in the sale of ordinary shares under the Equity Distribution Agreement. Such sales may be made under our Form S-3 in what may be deemed “at-the-market” equity offerings as defined in Rule 415 promulgated under the Securities Act, directly on or through the ~~NASDAQ~~Nasdaq Capital Market, to or through a market maker other than on an exchange or otherwise, in negotiated transactions at market prices prevailing at the time of sale or at prices related to such prevailing market prices, and/or any other method permitted by law, including in privately negotiated transactions. Taking into account ordinary shares issued and settled under our ATM since February 17, 2017, as of September 30, 2017, our remaining capacity for primary offerings under our Form S-3 during the 12 months after February 17, 2017 was $4.3 million, assuming we remain subject to such limitations throughout that 12-month period.

Piper Jaffray is entitled to compensation at a fixed commission rate of 3.0% of the gross sales price per share sold through it as agent under the Equity Distribution Agreement. Where Piper Jaffray acts as principal in the sale of ordinary shares under the Equity Distribution Agreement, such rate of compensation will not apply, but in no event will the total compensation of Piper Jaffray, when combined with the reimbursement of Piper Jaffray for the out-of-pocket fees and disbursements of its legal counsel, exceed 8.0% of the gross proceeds received from the sale of the ordinary shares.

We may instruct Piper Jaffray not to sell ordinary shares if the sales cannot be effected at or above the price designated by us in any instruction. We or Piper Jaffray may suspend an offering of ordinary shares under the ATM Offering Program upon proper notice and subject to other conditions, as further described in the Equity Distribution Agreement. Additionally, the ATM Offering Program will terminate on the earlier of (i) the sale of all ordinary shares subject to the Equity Distribution Agreement or (ii) the termination of the Equity Distribution Agreement. The Equity Distribution Agreement may be terminated by Piper Jaffray or us at any time on the close of business on the date of receipt of written notice, and by Piper Jaffray at any time in certain circumstances, including any suspension or limitation on the trading of our ordinary shares on the NASDAQ ~~Capital~~Global Market, as further described in the Equity Distribution Agreement. During the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2017,~~March 31, 2018, the Company issued and sold ~~5,379,908~~389,400 ordinary shares at an average price of ~~$1.76~~$1.13 per share under its ATM Offering Program (as defined in Note 8e7e below). The gross proceeds to the Company were ~~$9,448~~$440 thousand, and the net aggregate proceeds after deducting commissions, fees and offering expenses in the amount of ~~$439~~$50 thousand were ~~$9.0 million.~~$390 thousand. As a result, from the inception of the ATM Offering Program in May 2016 until ~~September 30, 2017,~~March 31, 2018, we had sold ~~6,071,970~~6,694,546 ordinary shares under the ATM Offering Program for net proceeds to us of ~~$13.1~~$13.8 million (after commissions, fees and expenses). Additionally, as of that date, we had paid Piper Jaffray compensation of ~~$420~~$444 thousand and had incurred total expenses of approximately ~~$907~~$948 thousand in connection with the ATM Offering Program. We intend to continue using this program opportunistically to raise additional funds. Because we registered up to $25 million in sales under our Form S-3 in our ATM Offering Program, we could raise up to a remaining $10.2 million under the program, subject to a limitation on sales under the Form S-3 limiting sales to $13.7 million during any 12-month period.

Table of Contents

~~Follow-on Offering of Units~~Timwell Private Placement

On ~~November 1, 2016,~~March 6, 2018, we ~~closed~~entered into an investment agreement with Timwell, pursuant to which we agreed, in return for aggregate gross proceeds to us of $20 million, to issue to Timwell an aggregate of 16,000,000 of our ~~follow-on public offering of 3,250,000 units, each consisting of one ordinary share and 0.75 of a warrant to purchase one ordinary share. The units were not issued or certificated, and the~~ ordinary shares, at a price per share of $1.25, Timwell will make the investment in three tranches, including $5 million for 4,000,000 shares in the first tranche, $10 million for 8,000,000 shares in the second tranche (the “Second Tranche Closing”) and ~~warrants underlying~~$5 million for 4,000,000 shares in the ~~units were immediately separable~~third tranche (the “Third Tranche Closing”). We intend to use the net proceeds from this agreement primarily for (i) sales, marketing activities related to market development in our existing markets as well as expanding into China and ~~issued separately. The warrants are not listed on~~reimbursement expenses related to broadening third-party payor coverage and (ii) research and development costs related to developing our lightweight “soft suit” exoskeleton technology for various lower limb disabilities, including stroke and other indications affecting the ~~NASDAQ Capital Market, any other national securities exchange or any other nationally recognized trading system. The ordinary shares and~~ability to walk, while using the ~~warrants underlying~~remainder for general corporate purposes. We will have broad discretion in the ~~units and~~way that we use the ~~ordinary shares issuable upon exercise~~net proceeds of the warrants are registered under the Securities Act on our Form S-3. Our estimated net aggregate proceeds, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated expenses, were $11.1 million. We also granted Oppenheimer, as underwriter under the underwriting agreement, an option to purchase up to 487,500 additional units at the public offering price, less the underwriting discount, for 30 days after October 27, 2016, which Oppenheimer did not exercise.this agreement.

The ~~warrants became exercisable during the period commencing from the date of original issuance and ending on November 1, 2021, the expiration date~~closing of the ~~warrants, at an initial exercise price~~various tranches is subject to specified closing conditions, including the approval by our shareholders of ~~$4.75 per ordinary share. The exercise price~~the transaction under Nasdaq rules and Israeli law, the formation of a joint venture, the signing of a license agreement and a supply agreement and the ~~number~~successful production of ~~ordinary shares into which~~certain ReWalk products, among others, with the ~~warrants may be exercised are subject~~Third Tranche Closing expected to ~~adjustment upon certain corporate events, including stock splits, reverse stock splits, combinations, stock dividends, recapitalizations, reorganizations~~occur by December 31, 2018 and ~~certain other events. Our board of directors may also determine to make such adjustments to the exercise price~~no later than April 1, 2019. For more information, see “Part I. Item 1. Business-Timwell Investment Agreement and number of ordinary shares to be issued upon exercise based on similar events, including the granting of stock appreciation rights, phantom stock rights or other rights with equity features. At any time, the board of directors may reduce the exercise price of the warrants to any amount and for any period of time it deems appropriate. As of September 30,Related Transactions.” in our 2017 ~~none of the warrants issued in the follow-on offering had been exercised.~~Form 10-K.

Cash Flows for the ~~Nine~~Three Months Ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2018 and March 31, 2017 ~~and September 30, 2016~~(in thousands):


	Nine Months Ended September 30,						Three Months Ended March 31,
	2017			2016			2018			2017
Net cash used in operating activities	$	(17,072	)	$	(20,200	)	$	(5,026	)	$	(6,029	)
Net cash used in investing activities	(19		)	(408		)	—			(10		)
Net cash provided by financing activities	6,341			15,138
Net cash used in financing activities							(729		)	(490		)
Net cash flow	$	(10,750	)	$	(5,470	)	$	(5,755	)	$	(6,529	)

Net Cash Used in Operating Activities

Net cash used in operating activities decreased to ~~$17.1~~$5 million for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2017~~March 31, 2018 compared to ~~$20.2~~$6 million for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2016~~March 31, 2017 primarily ~~as a result of increased revenue, lower operating expenses as result of recent cost reduction efforts, and a decrease~~due to changes in ~~expenses related to Collaboration Agreement and the License Agreement, as discussed above.~~working capital.

Net Cash Used in Investing Activities

Net cash used in investing activities decreased to ~~$19~~nil for the three months ended March 31, 2018 compared to $10 thousand for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2017 ~~compared to $408 thousand for the nine months ended September 30, 2016~~ primarily as a result of decreased use of cash for the purchase of property and equipment.

Net Cash ~~Provided by~~Used in Financing Activities

Net cash ~~provided by~~used in financing activities ~~was $6.3 million~~increased to $729 thousand for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2017,~~March 31, 2018 compared to ~~$15.1 million in~~$490 thousand for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2016. The decrease is related~~March 31, 2017, primarily due to ~~the receipt of proceeds under our Loan Agreement in the nine months period ended September 30, 2016, which were higher than~~ the proceeds we received from issuance of ordinary shares in the ATM Offering Program in the ~~nine~~three months ~~period~~ ended ~~September 30, 2017.~~March 31, 2017, which were higher than the proceeds we received in the three months ended March 31, 2018.

Table of Contents

Obligations and Commercial Commitments

Set forth below is a summary of our contractual obligations as of ~~September 30, 2017.~~March 31, 2018.


	Payments due by period (in dollars, in thousands)										Payments due by period (in dollars, in thousands)
Contractual obligations	Total		Less than 1 year		1-3 years		3-5 years		More than 5 years		Total		Less than 1 year		1-3 years		3-5 years		More than 5 years

Purchase obligations (1)	$	806	$	806	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	317	$	317	$	—	$	—	$	—
Collaboration Agreement and License Agreement obligations (2)	4,238		1,350		2,100		788		—		3,513		1,250		1,988		275		—
Operating lease obligations (3)	4,251		636		1,173		1,190		1,252		3,981		646		1,182		1,198		955
Long-term debt obligations (4)	19,288		5,663		13,625		—		—		16,845		6,441		10,404		—		—
Total	$	28,583	$	8,455	$	16,898	$	1,978	$	1,252	$	24,656	$	8,654	$	13,574	$	1,473	$	955

(1) The Company depends on one contract manufacturer, Sanmina. We place our manufacturing orders with Sanmina pursuant to purchase orders or by providing forecasts for future requirements.

(2) ~~Our~~As of March 31, 2018, our Research Collaboration Agreement is for a period of five years and requires us to pay in quarterly installments for the funding of our joint research collaboration with Harvard, subject to a minimum funding commitment under applicable circumstances. Our License Agreement consists of patent reimbursement expenses payments and of license upfront fee payment. There are also several milestone payments contingent upon the achievement of certain product development and commercialization milestones and royalty payments on net sales from certain patents licensed to Harvard. These product development and commercialization milestones depend on favorable clinical developments, sales and regulatory actions, some or all of which may not occur. Since the achievement and timing of these milestones is neither determinable nor reasonably estimable, these milestone payments are not included in this “Contractual Obligations” table or recorded on our consolidated condensed balance sheet as of ~~September 30, 2017.~~March 31, 2018. Moreover, since such royalties are dependent on future product sales which are neither determinable nor reasonably estimable, these royalty payments are not included in this “Contractual Obligations” table or recorded on our ~~condensed~~ consolidated consolidated balance sheet as of ~~September 30, 2017~~March 31, 2018. For more information, see Note 76 to our condensed consolidated financial statements included in “Part I, Item 1” of this quarterly report.

(3) Our operating leases consist of leases for our facilities and motor vehicles.

(4) Our long-term debt obligations consist of payments of principal and interest under our Loan Agreement with Kreos. For more information, see “-Liquidity and Capital Resources -Loan Agreement with Kreos and Related Warrant to Purchase Ordinary Shares” above.

~~(4) Our long-term debt obligations consist of payments of principal and interest under our Loan Agreement with Kreos.~~

We calculated the payments due under our operating lease obligation for our Israeli office that are to be paid in NIS at a rate of exchange of NIS ~~3.526:~~3.514:$1.00, and the payments due under our operating lease obligation for our German subsidiary that are to be paid in euros at a rate of exchange of ~~1.1819~~1.2319 euro:$1:00, both of which were the applicable exchange rates as of ~~September 30, 2017.~~March 31, 2018. We calculated the payments due under our Loan Agreement with Kreos according to the current schedule of repayment of principal and interest.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We had no off-balance sheet arrangements or guarantees of third-party obligationsas of ~~September 30, 2017.~~March 31, 2018.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

There have been no material changes to our market risk during the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2017.~~2018. For a discussion of our exposure to market risk, please see ~~“Part~~Part II, Item 7A, ~~Quantitative~~“Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk” of our ~~2016~~2017 Form 10-K.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required financial disclosure.

As of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and Rule 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act). Based upon, and as of the date of, this evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective such that the information required to be disclosed by us in our SEC reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms, and is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

During the ~~third~~ first quarter of ~~2017~~2018 there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act) that materially affected, or that are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Table of Contents

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

There have been no material changes to our legal proceedings as described in “Part I, Item 3. Legal Proceedings” of our ~~2016~~2017 Form 10-K except as described in Note 5 ~~and 11~~ in our condensed consolidated financial statements included in “Part I, Item 1” of this quarterly report.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

There have been no material changes to our risk factors from those disclosed in “Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors” of our ~~2016~~2017 Form 10-K except as noted below:

~~We may not have sufficient funds~~Risks Related to meet certain future capital requirements or grow our business, and may need to take advantage of various forms of capital-raising transactions. Future equity or debt financings or strategic transactions may dilute our shareholders, disrupt our business or place us under restrictive covenants, while limitations under our registration statement on Form S-3 may make it more difficult for us to raise money in the public markets.Government Regulation

As of September 30, 2017, we had an accumulated deficit in the total amount of $125 million, and further losses are anticipated in the development of our business. Those factors raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Our ability to continue as a going concern depends upon our obtaining the necessary financing to meet our obligations and timely repay our liabilities arising from normal business operations.

We intend to finance operating costs over the next 12 months with existing cash on hand, issuances of equity and/or debt securities, including issuances under our ATM Offering Program, or through a combination of the foregoing. However, we will need to seek additional sources of financing to the extent that we require more funds than anticipated during the next 12 months or in later periods, including if we cannot make our loan repayments under our Loan Agreement with Kreos or if we cannot raise sufficient funds from equity issuances, such as the ATM Offering Program. Due to limitations under the rules of Form S-3, which have applied to us since we filed our 2016 Form 10-K, and taking into account ordinary shares issued and settled under our ATM Offering Program, as of September 30, 2017, we could only issue up to $4.3 million in primary offerings under our effective Form S-3, including our ATM Offering Program, during the 12 months following February 17, 2017, until and unless we cease to be subject to these limitations. For more information on these limitations, see “Part I, Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations-Liquidity and Capital Resources-Equity Raises.” This limitation makes it more difficult for us to raise money in the public markets.

To raise additional capital in the public markets, including taking into account the limitation above, we may be required to seek other more costly or time-consuming methods, such as registration statements on Form S-1. We may also conduct fundraising transactions in the form of private placements, potentially with registration rights or priced at a discount to the market value of our ordinary shares, which could require shareholder approval under the rules of The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (“NASDAQ”), or other equity raise transactions. In addition to increased capital costs, any such transactions could result in substantial dilution of our shareholders’ interests, transfer control to a new investor and diminish the value of an investment in our ordinary shares. We may also need to pursue strategic transactions, such as joint ventures, in-licensing transactions or the sale of our business or all or substantially all of our assets. These private financings and strategic transactions could require significant management attention, disrupt our business, adversely affect our financial results, be unsuccessful or fail to achieve the desired results. We are in discussions routinely with such possible sources of additional funding, including during the pendency of sales under our ATM Offering Program. We have not entered into any agreement or understanding regarding any such transaction.

As another alternative, we may in the future choose to refinance up to a substantial portion of our remaining indebtedness under the Loan Agreement, including by tying our repayment obligations and amortization schedule to the achievement of certain business milestones, which we have considered with Kreos from time to time. Agreements governing any borrowing arrangement may contain covenants that could restrict our operations. In sum, if we are unable to obtain additional funds on reasonable terms, it could impair our efforts to develop and commercialize existing and new products and to repay our liabilities as they become due, materially harming our results of operations and financial condition.

If we are unable to leverage and expand our sales, marketing, training and reimbursement infrastructure, including in light of our announced plan to reduce corporate spending, we may fail to increase our revenues.

A key element of our long-term business strategy is the continued enhancement of our sales, marketing, training and reimbursement infrastructure, through the training, retaining and motivating of skilled sales and marketing representatives and reimbursement personnel with industry experience and knowledge. Our ability to derive revenue from sales of our products depends largely on our ability to market the products and obtain reimbursements for them. In order to continue growing our business efficiently, we must therefore coordinate the development of our sales, marketing, training and reimbursement infrastructure with the timing of regulatory approvals, decisions regarding reimbursements and other factors in various geographies. Managing and maintaining this infrastructure is expensive and time-consuming, and an inability to leverage such an organization effectively, or in coordination with regulatory or other developments, could inhibit potential sales and the penetration and adoption of ReWalk into both existing and new markets. In addition, as previously announced, we have set a goal to reduce total operating expenses in 2017 by up to 30% as compared to 2016, in part through a realignment of and reduction in staffing to match our 2017 business goals. As we move forward with these plans, we intend to continue funding field sales, service and training efforts for our ReWalk products. However, certain decisions we make regarding staffing in these areas in our efforts to decrease expenses could have unintended negative effects on our revenues, such as by weakening our sales infrastructure, impairing our reimbursement efforts and/or harming the quality of our customer service. For instance, the number of our staff focused on reimbursement has decreased, and we recently consolidated the functions of two employees that previously focused on reimbursement into the roles of certain executive officers and employees in other departments. Additionally, our Chief Commercial Officer recently passed away.

We also expect to face significant challenges as we manage and continue to improve our sales and marketing infrastructure and work to retain the individuals who make up those networks. Newly hired sales representatives require training and take time to achieve full productivity. If we fail to train new hires adequately, or if we experience high turnover in our sales force in the future, we cannot be certain that new hires will become as productive as may be necessary to maintain or increase our sales. In addition, if we are not able to retain, subject to our plans to cut operating expenses, and continue to recruit our network of internal trainers, we may not be able to successfully train customers on the use of ReWalk, which could inhibit new sales and harm our reputation. If we are unable to expand our sales, marketing and training capabilities, we may not be able to effectively commercialize ReWalk, or enhance the strength of our brand, which could have a material adverse effect on our operating results.

~~We are subject to securities class action lawsuits against us that may result in an adverse outcome.~~

Between September 2016 and January 2017, eight putative class actions on behalf of alleged shareholders that purchased or acquired our ordinary shares pursuant and/or traceable to our registration statement on Form F-1 (File No. 333-197344) used in connection with our IPO, were commenced in the following courts: (i) the Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Mateo; (ii) the Superior Court of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Suffolk County; (iii) the United States District Court for the Northern District of California; and (iv) the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts. The actions involve claims under various sections of the Securities Act against us, certain of our current and former directors and officers, the underwriters of our IPO and certain other defendants. The four actions commenced in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Mateo have been dismissed for lack of personal jurisdiction, and the action commenced in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California has been voluntarily dismissed. As of November 1, 2017, three actions remain pending, including (i) the two actions commenced in the Superior Court of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, which have been consolidated, and (ii) the action commenced in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts, or Massachusetts Federal Court, which was brought in part by certain of the plaintiffs whose actions were dismissed in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Mateo (referred to in this quarterly report as the “Massachusetts Federal Court Action”). The parties in the consolidated Massachusetts State Court Actions have completed briefing on the Company’s motion to dismiss. The plaintiffs in the Massachusetts Federal Court Action filed a consolidated amended complaint in August 2017 adding claims that certain statements we made after our IPO were materially misleading. The court denied the Company’s motion to stay the Massachusetts Federal Court Action, and the Company intends to move to dismiss the action. For more information, see Notes 5d and 11 to our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included in “Part I, Item 1” of this quarterly report.

We are generally required, to the extent permitted by Israeli law, to indemnify our current and former directors and officers who are named as defendants in these types of lawsuits. We also have certain contractual indemnification obligations to the underwriters of our IPO regarding the securities class action lawsuits. While a certain amount of insurance coverage is available for expenses or losses associated with these lawsuits, this coverage may not be sufficient. Based on information currently available, we are unable to reasonably estimate a possible loss or range of possible losses, if any, with regard to these lawsuits; therefore, no litigation reserve has been recorded in our consolidated balance sheets. Although we plan to defend against these lawsuits vigorously, there can be no assurance that a favorable final outcome will be obtained. These lawsuits or future litigation may require significant attention from management and could result in significant legal expenses, settlement costs or damage awards that could have a materially adverse impact on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

We have initiated a mandatory postmarket surveillance study on our ReWalk Personal 6.0 with a revised FDA-approved protocol, addressing certain violations and deficiencies cited by the FDA that had previously led the FDA to warn us of potential regulatory action. Going forward, if we cannot meet certain FDA requirements for the study or otherwise satisfy FDA requests promptly, or if our study produces unfavorable results, we could receive additional FDA warnings, which could materially and adversely affect our labeling or marketing efforts.

We are currently conducting an ongoing mandatory FDA postmarket surveillance study on our ReWalk Personal 6.0, which began in June 2016. Before we began the current study, the FDA sent us a letter on September 30, 2015 (the "September 2015 Letter"), warning of potential regulatory action against us for violations of Section 522 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, based on our failure to initiate a postmarket surveillance study by the September 28, 2015 deadline and our allegedly deficient protocol for that study. Between June 2014 and our receipt of the September 2015 Letter, we had responded late to certain of the FDA’s requests related to our study protocol. In February 2016, the FDA sent us an additional information request ("the February 2016 Letter"), requesting additional changes to our study protocol and asking that we comply within 30 days. This letter also discussed the FDA’s request, as modified in our later discussions with the FDA, for a new premarket notification for our ReWalk device(the "special 510(k)"), linked to what the FDA viewed as changes to a computer included with the device. In late March 2016, following multiple discussions with the FDA, including an in-person meeting, the FDA confirmed that the agency would apply enforcement discretion to continued marketing of the ReWalk device conditioned upon our timely submitting a special 510(k) and initiating our postmarket surveillance study by June 1, 2016. The special 510(k) was timely submitted on April 8, 2016, and the FDA’s substantial equivalence determination was received by us on July 22, 2016, granting us permission to continue marketing the ReWalk device. Additionally, we submitted a protocol to the FDA for the postmarket surveillance study that was approved by the FDA on May 5, 2016.

We began the study on June 13, 2016, with Stanford University as the lead investigational site. In August 2016, the FDA sent us a letter stating that, based on its evaluation of our corrective and preventive actions in response to the September 2015 Letter, we had adequately addressed the violations cited in the September 2015 Letter. As part of our study, we have provided the FDA with the required periodic reports on the study’s progress, in a few cases with delay. We intend to continue providing the FDA with such reports on a timely basis going forward.

We expect we will be able to respond promptly to the FDA’s further requests associated with the postmarket surveillance study with the assistance of our outside clinical and regulatory services provider. However, we may ultimately be unable to timely satisfy the FDA's requests with respect to the study. Additionally, as of November 1, 2017, we had three active centers enrolling patients in the study, with a total of seven enrolled patients and four active patients, and two others were completing the process to enroll patients by the second half of 2017. This is substantially below the estimated number of patients included in our study protocol, currently leading the FDA to label our progress as “inadequate.” We may seek to modify our study protocol to expand the pool of patients and/or decrease the total number of patients, which change will require approval from the FDA. However, there can be no assurance that the FDA will agree to modify our study or that we will manage to attract the required number of patients under the current requirements or with the revised requirements. If we cannot meet FDA requirements or timely address requests from the FDA related to the study, or if the results of the study are not as favorable as we expect, the FDA may issue additional warning letters to us, impose limitations on the labeling of our device or require us to stop marketing the ReWalk Personal device in the United States. We derived approximately 64% and 68% of our revenues in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 and the nine months ended September 30, 2017, respectively, from sales of the ReWalk device in the United States and, if we are unable to market the ReWalk device in the United States, we expect that these sales would be adversely impacted, which could materially adversely affect our business and overall results of operations.

If our product may have caused or contributed to a death or a serious injury, or if our product malfunctioned and the malfunction’s recurrence would be likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury, we must comply with medical device reporting regulations, which could result in voluntary corrective actions or agency enforcement actions against us.

Under the medical device reporting (MDR) regulations of the FDA, we are required to report to the FDA any incident in which our product may have caused or contributed to a death or serious injury or in which our product malfunctioned and, if the malfunction were to recur, our product or a similar device marketed by us would be likely to cause or contribute to death or serious injury. In addition, all manufacturers placing medical devices in European Union markets are legally bound to report any serious or potentially serious incidents involving devices they produce or sell to the relevant authority in whose jurisdiction the incident occurred. ~~We recently~~Between 2013 and 2017, we submitted a number of MDRs to report incidents in which ReWalk Personal users sustained falls or fractures. The FDA ~~has~~ sent us letters requesting additional information relating to these ~~MDRs.~~ MDRs submitted in 2017, including a request for a failure analysis. We initiated a voluntary correction in August 2017 for the ReWalk device that related to certain use instructions to reduce the risk of fractures and submitted a report to the FDA under 21 CFR Part 806 (“Part 806”). Under Part 806, manufacturers and importers are required to make a report to the FDA of any correction or removal of a device if the correction or removal was initiated to reduce a risk to health posed by the device or to remedy a violation of the U.S. Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act caused by the device that may present a risk to health. In early 2018, we submitted additional MDRs for fractures that occurred in foreign countries between 2015 and 2018, and for one fracture that occurred in the United States. In late 2017. We recently made labeling and design modifications to the ReWalk to mitigate the risk of fractures. We believe the implementation of the revised use instructions and/or additional labeling or design modifications will trigger the need for a new 510(k), which the Company plans to submit to the FDA.

Additional fractures or other adverse events may occur in the future that may require us to report to the FDA pursuant to the MDR ~~regulations.~~regulations, and/or to initiate a removal, correction, or other action. Any adverse event involving our products could result in future voluntary corrective actions, such as recalls or customer letters, ~~agency~~or in an FDA enforcement action, such as ~~inspection,~~a mandatory recall, notification to healthcare professionals and users, warning letter, seizure, injunction, or ~~other~~import alert. In addition, failure to report such adverse events to appropriate government authorities on a timely basis, or at all, could result in enforcement action against us. Moreover, FDA could find that already implemented use instructions should have been reviewed by FDA through the 510(k) premarket notification process, and such a finding could also result in an FDA enforcement action. Any ~~corrective~~ action, whether voluntary or involuntary, as well as defending ourselves in a lawsuit, will require financial resources and distract management, and may harm our reputation and financial results. ~~In addition, failure to report such adverse events to appropriate government authorities on a timely basis, or at all, could result in enforcement action against us.~~

~~A decline in the value of our ordinary shares could result in our being characterized as a passive foreign investment company, which would cause adverse tax consequences for U.S. investors.~~

Generally, if for any taxable year 75% or more of our gross income is passive income, or at least 50% of the average quarterly value of our assets (which may be determined in part by the market value of our ordinary shares, which is subject to change) are held for the production of, or produce, passive income, we would be characterized as a passive foreign investment company (“PFIC”), for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Passive income for this purpose generally includes, among other things, certain dividends, interest, royalties, rents and gains from commodities and securities transactions and from the sale or exchange of property that gives rise to passive income. Passive income also includes amounts derived by reason of the temporary investment of funds, including those raised in a public offering. In determining whether a non-U.S. corporation is a PFIC, a proportionate share of the income and assets of each corporation in which it owns, directly or indirectly, at least a 25% interest (by value) is taken into account. Based on our gross income and assets, the market price of our ordinary shares, and the nature of our business, we do not believe that we were a PFIC for the taxable year ended December 31, 2016. However, there can be no assurance that we will not be considered a PFIC for 2017 or any taxable year. PFIC status is determined as of the end of the taxable year and depends on a number of factors, including the value of a corporation’s assets and the amount and type of its gross income. Further, because the value of our gross assets is likely to be determined in large part by reference to our market capitalization, there is a significant risk that a decline in the value of our ordinary shares could result in our becoming a PFIC.

If we ~~are characterized as a PFIC, U.S. Holders (as defined below) may suffer adverse tax consequences, including~~or our third-party manufacturers or suppliers fail to comply with the ~~following: (i) having gains realized on the sale~~FDA’s Quality System Regulation, or QSR, our manufacturing operations could be interrupted.

We, Sanmina and some of our ~~securities treated as ordinary income, rather than as capital gains; (ii) losing~~suppliers are required to comply with the ~~preferential rate applicable to dividends received on~~FDA’s QSR which covers the methods and documentation of the design, testing, production, control, quality assurance, labeling, packaging, sterilization, storage and shipping of our ~~ordinary shares by individuals who~~products. We, Sanmina and our suppliers are ~~U.S. Holders, and (iii) having additional taxes equal~~also subject to the ~~interest charges generally~~regulations of foreign jurisdictions regarding the manufacturing process if we or our distributors market our products abroad. We continue to monitor our quality management in order to improve our overall level of compliance. Our facilities are subject to periodic and unannounced inspection by U.S. and foreign regulatory agencies to audit compliance with the QSR and comparable foreign regulations. If our facilities or those of Sanmina or our suppliers are found to be in violation of applicable laws and regulations, or if we, Sanmina or our suppliers fail to ~~underpayments~~take satisfactory corrective action in response to an adverse inspection, the regulatory authority could take enforcement action, including any of ~~tax apply to distributions by us~~the following sanctions:

untitled letters, warning letters, fines, injunctions, consent decrees and ~~the proceeds~~civil penalties;

customer notifications or repair, replacement or refunds;

operating restrictions or partial suspension or total shutdown of ~~sales~~production;

recalls, withdrawals, or administrative detention or seizure of our ~~ordinary shares in public offerings. A “U.S. Holder” is defined as follows:~~products;

refusing or delaying requests for 510(k) marketing clearance or approval of pre-market approval applications relating to new products or modified products;

withdrawing a citizen or resident of the United States; a corporation (or other entity treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes) created or organized in or under the laws of the United States or any state thereof, including the District of Columbia; an estate the income of which is subject to U.S. federal income taxation regardless of its source; or a trust if such trust has validly elected to be treated as a United States person for U.S. federal income tax purposes or if (1) a court within the United States is able to exercise primary supervision over its administration and (2) one or more United States persons have the authority to control all of the substantial decisions of such trust. Certain elections exist that may alleviate some of the adverse consequences of PFIC status and would result in an alternative treatment (such as mark-to-market treatment). However, we do not intendPMA approval;

refusing to provide ~~the information necessary~~Certificates for ~~U.S. Holders to make qualified electing fund elections if we are classified as a PFIC.~~Foreign Government;

~~Future grants of ordinary shares under~~refusing to grant export approval for our ~~equity incentive plans to our employees, non-employee directors and consultants,~~products; or sales by these individuals in the public market, could result in substantial dilution, thus decreasing the value of your investment in our ordinary shares, and certain grants may also require shareholder approval.

~~We have historically used, and continue~~pursuing criminal prosecution.

Any of these sanctions could impair our ability to use, our ordinary shares as a means of both rewarding our employees, non-employee directors and consultants and aligning their interests with those of our shareholders. As of September 30, 2017, 3,194,556 ordinary shares remained available for issuance to our and our affiliates’ respective employees, non-employee directors and consultants under our equity incentive plans, including 2,592,398 ordinary shares subject to outstanding awards (consisting of outstanding options to purchase 2,238,961 ordinary shares and 353,437 ordinary shares underlying unvested RSUs). These numbers do not reflect the ultimate results of our one-time Equity Exchange Program for the exchange of “underwater” stock options for new RSUs, which expired on October 4, 2017. For more information, see Note 8a to our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements set forth in “Part I, Item 1. Financial Statements” above. Additionally, the number of ordinary shares available for issuance under our 2014 Plan may increase each year due to the operation of an “evergreen” provision previously approved by our shareholders. Pursuant to this provision, the 2014 Plan’s reserve increases on January 1 of each calendar year during the plan’s term by the lesser of (i) 972,000, (ii) 4% of the total number of shares outstanding on December 31 of the immediately preceding calendar year and (iii) an amount determined by our board of directors.

~~We previously signed an agreement with a non-employee consultant, who agreed to assist us in commercially promoting and expanding insurance coverage of our~~produce ReWalk devices. Although this agreement terminated in May 2017 and was not extended, if we may choose to compensate this consultant for services in an amount equal to those provided for in the expired agreement, the consultant may receive up to ten percent of the increase in our market capitalization following the dates when coverage becomes active under national insurance policies that the consultant secures for us, subject to certain monetary limits. For more information, see Note 8e to our audited consolidated financial statements in our 2016 Form 10-K. If we opt to pay the consultant in ordinary shares, we may need to seek shareholder approval pursuant to the rules of NASDAQ, potentially due to the size of an issuance or an insufficient number of ordinary shares available for issuance under our 2014 Plan. Any such issuance, or the perception that we will make issuances when we solicit shareholder approval, could substantially dilute existing shareholders and materially decrease the value of an investment in our ordinary shares. Additionally, to the extent registered on a Form S-8, ordinary shares granted or issued under our equity incentive plans will, subject to vesting provisions, lock-up restrictions and Rule 144 volume limitations applicable to our “affiliates,” be available for sale in the open market immediately upon registration. Sales of a substantial number of the above-mentioned ordinary shares in the public market could result in a ~~significant decrease~~cost-effective and timely manner in ~~the market price of~~order to meet our ~~ordinary shares~~customers’ demands, and could have a material adverse effect on ~~an investment in~~ our ~~ordinary shares.~~reputation, business, results of operations and financial condition. We may also be required to bear other costs or take other actions that may have a negative impact on our future sales and our ability to generate profits.

~~Sales of~~

Risks Related to an Investment in Our Ordinary Shares

Timwell, along with a ~~substantial~~small number of shareholders, currently has significant influence over matters requiring shareholder approval. Additionally, as a result of the issuance of the periodic agreed-upon ordinary shares ~~by us, our large~~to it, Timwell will on its own have increasing influence and ultimately possible de facto control over such matters. This could discourage takeover or merger attempts or other actions shareholders ~~and holders~~may consider favorable

As of ~~our warrants and other derivative securities, several of whom have registration rights, or volatility or a reduction in~~May 15, 2018, the ~~market price~~largest beneficial owner of our ordinary shares ~~could have an adverse effect on~~is Timwell, with 11.6% of our ~~ordinary shares.~~

~~Sales by us or our shareholders of a substantial number of~~outstanding ordinary shares in the public market, or the perception that these sales might occur, could cause the value of our ordinary shares to decline or could impair our ability to raise capital through a future sale of, or pay for acquisitions using, our equity securities.

As of September 30, 2017, 403,804 ordinary shares were issuable pursuant to the exercise of outstanding warrants granted as part of our Series E Preferred investment round in July 2014 at an exercise price of $10.08 and 2,437,500 ordinary shares were issuable pursuant to the exercise of warrants issued in our follow-on offering of ordinary shares and warrants in November 2016, with an exercise price of $4.75. There were also 167,012(excluding ordinary shares issuable ~~pursuant to the~~upon conversion or exercise of ~~warrants granted to Kreos in connection with the Loan Agreement in January and December 2016, with an exercise price of $9.64, and 2,523,660 ordinary~~derivative securities owned by other shareholders or shares issuable ~~pursuant to~~under our equity incentive plans). Additionally, the ~~conversion of the Kreos Convertible Note at a conversion price of $1.268 per share (subject to customary anti-dilution adjustments).~~

~~Additionally, pursuant to our Amended and Restated Shareholders’ Rights Agreement, dated July 14, 2014, with certain of our shareholders, as of September 30, 2017, the~~three other large beneficial owners of ~~approximately 4,116,143 of~~ our ~~ordinary~~ shares were entitled to require that we register their shares under the Securities Act for resale into the public markets. In our Kreos Convertible Note, we separately undertook to prepare and file with the SEC a registration statement to enable the resale by Kreos of up to 2,523,660 ordinary shares to be issued upon conversion of the note, unless they could otherwise be freely sold using Rule 144 under the Securities Act.

All shares sold pursuant to an offering covered by a registration statement would be freely transferable. With respect to the outstanding warrants and the Kreos Convertible Note, there may be certain restrictions on the holders to sell the underlying ordinary shares to the extent they are restricted securities, held by “affiliates” or would exceed certain ownership thresholds. Certain of our largest shareholders, namely,include Yaskawa Electric Corporation (“Yaskawa”), ~~and~~ certain entities and individuals affiliated with SCP Vitalife Partners II ~~L.P~~L.P. (“Vitalife”), may also have limitations under Rule 144 under the Securities Act on the resale of certain ordinary shares they hold. Despite these limitations, if we, our existing shareholders or their affiliates sell a substantial number of the above-mentioned ordinary shares in the public market, the market price of our ordinary shares could decrease significantly. Any such decrease could impair the value of your investment in us.

The market price of our ordinary shares has also been highly volatile and may fluctuate substantially due to several factors. Effective May 2017, we transferred our ordinary shares from the NASDAQ Global Market to the NASDAQ Capital Market due to our failure to meet the market value of listed securities requirements and the alternative ~~total assets and total revenue standard~~ requirements of the NASDAQ Global Market. Additionally, since the first quarter of 2017, our ordinary shares have traded periodically between $1.00 and $2.00, reaching an all-time low of $1.10 in the second quarter of 2017. To maintain our current listing on the NASDAQ Capital Market, we must meet certain requirements, including, among others, a minimum closing bid price per share. If the closing bid price of our ordinary shares for 30 consecutive business days is less than $1.00 per share, or if we cannot meet other continued listing requirements, NASDAQ will send us a notification of deficiency and provide us a cure period of 180 days, subject to a potential subsequent cure period of an additional 180 days. After the applicable period, if we cannot show compliance with certain NASDAQ Capital Market listing requirements, we will become subject to delisting proceedings. The perception among investors that we are at heightened risk of delisting could negatively affect the market price and trading volume of our ordinary shares. Additionally, if we become subject to delisting proceedings and fail to appeal a delisting determination, our ordinary shares will be delisted from NASDAQ entirely, which could reduce the number of investors willing to hold or acquire our ordinary shares, increase the volatility of the price of such shares and significantly lower the shares’ trading price and volume. Any of these events could also reduce our liquidity and impair our ability to raise capital.

~~A small number of our shareholders have a significant influence over matters requiring shareholder approval, which could delay or prevent a change of control.~~

~~As of September 30, 2017, the largest beneficial owners of our shares were Yaskawa, certain entities and individuals affiliated with Vitalife,~~ and Kreos, which is deemed a beneficial owner of our ordinary shares pursuant to its right to acquire ordinary shares upon the exercise of ~~the~~ warrants and the conversion of the Kreos Convertible Note, which may be converted at any time, subject to its terms. These three holders beneficially owned in the aggregate ~~23.5%~~approximately 15.5% of our ordinary shares as of ~~September 30, 2017 (taking into account~~May 15, 2018 (including Kreos’s beneficial ownership and other exercisable derivative securities in the total number of ordinary shares ~~outstanding)~~outstanding and excluding shares issuable under our equity incentive plans). As a result, Timwell, Yaskawa, ~~and~~ Vitalife, and, if it were to convert all ordinary shares underlying its convertible note, Kreos, ~~could exert significant influence over our operations and business strategy and~~ would together or in certain combinations have sufficient voting power to influence significantly the outcome of matters requiring shareholder approval. These matters may include:

~~determining~~ the composition of our board of directors, which has the authority to direct our business and to appoint and remove our officers;

approving or rejecting a merger, consolidation or other business combination;

raising future capital; and

amending our Second Amended and Restated Articles of Association, as amended by the First Amendment thereto, or our Articles of Association, which govern the rights attached to our ordinary shares.

~~This~~In addition, pursuant to the Investment Agreement, we have agreed to sell an additional 12,000,000 ordinary shares to Timwell in two additional tranches, subject to specified closing conditions. For more information, see “Part I. Item 1. Business-Timwell Investment Agreement and Related Transactions.” On a post-transaction basis, using the total number of ordinary shares outstanding as of May 15, 2018 (excluding ordinary shares issuable upon conversion or exercise of derivative securities owned by other shareholders or shares issuable under our equity incentive plans, and assuming no changes otherwise to our capitalization), after each of the Second Tranche Closing and the Third Tranche Closing, Timwell will beneficially own 28.2% and 34.3% of our ordinary shares, respectively. Additionally, under the terms of the Investment Agreement, as amended, Timwell is currently entitled, subject to maintaining 75% ownership of the Purchased Shares, to designate one nominee to our board. Following the Third Tranche Closing and for so long as the shareholding requirements above are satisfied, subject to compliance with Nasdaq’s voting rights rule, Timwell will be entitled to designate such aggregate number of members of the board equal to the higher of (i) one, or (ii) the number of board members affiliated or associated with that of the next two largest shareholders of the Company who has the largest number of such affiliated or associated directors. There are currently two board members affiliated or associated with each of Yaskawa and Vitalife.

Timwell has agreed to customary “standstill” restrictions and to vote its ordinary shares in accordance with the recommendation of our board on certain matters, provided it maintains a certain percentage of beneficial ownership in our ordinary shares. However, based solely on its board representation and significant ownership position, Timwell will, after each of the various closings, alone possess sufficient voting power to influence significantly, or potentially have de facto control over, the outcome of the above-listed matters requiring shareholder approval.

The concentration of ownership of our ordinary shares among Timwell, Vitalife, Yaskawa and Kreos currently, and by Timwell alone or with others in the future, could delay or prevent proxy contests, mergers, tender offers, open-market purchase programs or other purchases of our ordinary shares that might otherwise give ~~you~~public float shareholders the opportunity to realize a premium over the then-prevailing market price of our ordinary shares. This concentration of ownership may also adversely affect our share price.

We have regained compliance with the shareholders’ equity requirement for continued listing on Nasdaq. While we believe we are positioned to stay in compliance, there is no assurance that we will do so with respect to this and certain other Nasdaq continued listing requirements.

As previously disclosed, the Company received a notice of deficiency from Nasdaq on November 10, 2017 indicating that the Company did not comply with the minimum $2.5 million shareholders’ equity requirement for continued listing and did not meet the alternative $35.0 million market value of listed securities standard and $500 thousand net income standard requirements under Nasdaq Listing Rule 5550(b). After the Company submitted a compliance plan in December 2017, Nasdaq agreed in a letter to the Company in January 2018 to extend the Company’s period to demonstrate compliance on certain terms, including showing compliance as of March 31, 2018 when filing this quarterly report. We have presented to Nasdaq information regarding the pro forma effect of the closing of the first tranche of 4,000,000 shares to Timwell for $5 million on May 15, 2018 (not represented on our condensed consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2018 included elsewhere in this quarterly report) although do not expect that this alone will be sufficient to satisfy Nasdaq. We are awaiting Nasdaq’s response which will be provided following the filing of this quarterly report.

While, based on our operating and fundraising forecasts including the second and third tranche of the Timwell transaction, we believe that we will maintain compliance with the shareholders’ equity requirement throughout the 2018 fiscal year, there is no assurance that we will be able to do so. Additionally, we face risks regarding our compliance with other Nasdaq rules due to the market price of our ordinary shares. Along with meeting the above-discussed requirements of Rule 5550(b), we must satisfy the closing bid price per share requirement of Nasdaq Listing Rule 5550(a), as well as certain other requirements. If the closing bid price of our ordinary shares for 30 consecutive business days is less than $1.00 per share, Nasdaq will send us a notification of deficiency and may provide us a cure period, after which, if we cannot show compliance, we will become subject to delisting proceedings. From the first quarter of 2017 through the first half of 2018, our ordinary shares have traded periodically between $1.00 and $2.00, reaching an all-time low of $1.05. If our share price falls below $1.00, we may be unable to meet Rule 5550(a)’s closing bid price per share requirement.

If we do not succeed in maintaining the applicable listing requirements of Rule 5550(a), or we again become deficient under Rule 5550(b), our ordinary shares could be delisted from Nasdaq entirely. The Company would be permitted to appeal the delisting determination to a Nasdaq Hearings Panel, and the Company’s ordinary shares would remain listed on Nasdaq pending a decision by the panel after the hearing. If we do not appeal the delisting determination or do not succeed in such an appeal, we may list our ordinary shares on an over-the- counter exchange. While this could maintain some degree of a market in our ordinary shares, we could face substantial material adverse consequences, including, but not limited to, the following: limited availability for market quotations for our ordinary shares; reduced liquidity with respect to and decreased trading prices of our ordinary shares; a determination that our ordinary shares are “penny stock” under SEC rules, subjecting brokers trading our ordinary shares to more stringent rules on disclosure and the class of investors to which the broker may sell the ordinary shares; limited news and analyst coverage for our Company, in part due to the “penny stock” rules; and decreased ability to issue additional securities or obtain additional financing in the future; and potential breaches under or terminations of our agreements with current or prospective large shareholders, strategic investors and banks. The perception among investors that we are at heightened risk of delisting could negatively affect the market price and trading volume of our ordinary shares.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

There are no transactions that have not been previously included in a ~~Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q or in a~~ Current Report on Form 8-K.

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

Not applicable.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES.

Not applicable.

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

Not applicable.

Table of Contents

ITEM 6. EXHIBIT INDEX



Exhibit Number		Description
~~31.1~~ 10.1		Investment Agreement, dated March 6, 2018, between ReWalk Robotics Ltd. and Timwell Corporation Limited (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on March 23, 2018). ***
10.2		Framework Agreement Regarding a Potential Joint Venture, dated March 6, 2018, between RealCan Ambrum Healthcare Industry Investment (Shenzhen) Partnership Enterprise (Limited Partnership) and ReWalk Robotics Ltd. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on March 23, 2018). ***
10.3		Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated March 1, 2018, between ReWalk Robotics Ltd. and Ori Gon (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on March 7, 2018).**
10.4		Employment Agreement, dated May 25, 2015, between ReWalk Robotics Ltd. and Ori Gon (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on March 7, 2018).**
31.1		Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002.
31.2		Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002.
32.1		Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*
32.2		Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*
101.INS		XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.PRE		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
101.CAL		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.LAB		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.DEF		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

__________________________



*	Furnished herewith.
**	Management contract or compensatory plan, contract or arrangement.
***	Confidential treatment pursuant to Rule 24b- 2 under the Exchange Act has been granted as to certain portions of this exhibit, which portions were omitted and submitted separately to the SEC in a confidential treatment request.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.



	ReWalk Robotics Ltd.

Date: ~~November 2, 2017~~May 15, 2018	By:	/s/ Larry Jasinski
		~~Name:~~ Larry Jasinski
		~~Title:~~ Chief Executive Officer
		~~(Principal Executive Officer)~~

Date: ~~November 2, 2017~~May 15, 2018	By:	/s/ ~~Kevin Hershberger~~Ori Gon
		~~Name: Kevin Hershberger~~Ori Gon
		~~Title:~~ Chief Financial Officer
		(Principal Financial ~~Officer~~ and ~~Principal~~ Accounting Officer)

4543



	US Dollars in thousands
Balance at December 31, 2016	$	498
Provision	311
Usage	(275		)
Balance at September 30, 2017	$	534