UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q



x	Quarterly Report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the quarterly period ended: September 30, ~~2017~~2018



¨	Transition Report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the transition period from _____ to _____.

Commission File Number: 0-19672

American Superconductor Corporation

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



Delaware	04-2959321
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

~~64 Jackson Road, Devens,~~114 East Main St. Ayer, Massachusetts	~~01434~~01432
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

(978) 842-3000

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

N/A

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically ~~and posted on its corporate Web site, if any,~~ every Interactive Data File required to be submitted ~~and posted~~ pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit ~~and post~~ such files). Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated ~~filer” and~~filer,” “smaller reporting ~~company”~~company,” and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

Shares outstanding of the Registrant’s common stock:



Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share		~~20,925,142~~21,364,053
Class		Outstanding as of November 2, ~~2017~~2018

AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORPORATION

INDEX



		Page No.
PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.	Financial Statements	3

Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	2425

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	3335

Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	3335

PART II—OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	3435

Item 1A.	Risk Factors	35

Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	3536

Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	3536

Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosure	3536

Item 5.	Other Information	36

Item 6.	Exhibits	36

Signature		38

AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORPORATION

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands)


	September 30, 2017			March 31, 2017			September 30, 2018			March 31, 2018
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	30,320		$	26,784		$	56,169		$	34,084
Accounts receivable, net	8,193			7,956			7,622			7,365
Inventory	15,983			17,462			16,235			19,780
Note receivable, current portion							3,000			3,000
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	3,323			2,703			3,339			2,947
Restricted cash	—			795
Total current assets	57,819			55,700			86,365			67,176

Property, plant and equipment, net	36,438			43,438			10,582			12,513
Intangibles, net	3,496			301			3,060			3,230
Note receivable, long term portion, net of discount of $224 as of September 30, 2018 and net of discount of $336 and deferred gain of $105 as of March 31, 2018							2,776			2,559
Goodwill	1,711			—			1,719			1,719
Restricted cash	165			165			165			165
Deferred tax assets	538			407			506			542
Other assets	381			233			332			271
Total assets	$	100,548		$	100,244		$	105,505		$	88,175

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

Current liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	14,016		$	14,490		$	15,304		$	12,625
Note payable, current portion, net of discount of $19 as of March 31, 2017	—			1,481
Derivative liabilities	1,224			1,923			1,399			1,217
Deferred revenue	16,069			14,323
Deferred revenue, current portion							10,057			13,483
Total current liabilities	31,309			32,217			26,760			27,325

Deferred revenue	8,325			7,631
Deferred revenue, long term portion							7,891			8,454
Deferred tax liabilities	125			125			110			110
Other liabilities	137			45			98			57
Total liabilities	39,896			40,018			34,859			35,946

Commitments and contingencies (Note 14)
Commitments and contingencies (Note 15)

Stockholders' equity:
Common stock	211			147			216			211
Additional paid-in capital	1,039,458			1,017,510			1,042,962			1,041,113
Treasury stock	(1,645		)	(1,371		)	(2,042		)	(1,645		)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)	718			(503		)
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income							(11		)	883
Accumulated deficit	(978,090		)	(955,557		)	(970,479		)	(988,333		)
Total stockholders' equity	60,652			60,226			70,646			52,229
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	$	100,548		$	100,244		$	105,505		$	88,175

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORPORATION

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(In thousands, except per share data)


	Three months ended September 30,						Six months ended September 30,						Three months ended September 30,						Six months ended September 30,
	2017			2016			2017			2016			2018			2017			2018			2017
Revenues	$	11,049		$	18,507		$	19,971		$	31,852		$	14,876		$	11,049		$	27,483		$	19,971

Cost of revenues	10,777			16,404			24,186			28,886			11,252			10,777			19,966			24,186

Gross margin	272			2,103			(4,215		)	2,966			3,624			272			7,517			(4,215		)

Operating expenses:
Research and development	2,951			2,867			5,667			5,819			2,264			2,951			5,103			5,667
Selling, general and administrative	5,339			6,347			11,477			13,563			5,175			5,339			10,961			11,477
Amortization of acquisition-related intangibles	—			39			13			78			85			—			170			13
Change in fair value of contingent consideration	(201		)	—			(201		)	—			—			(201		)	—			(201		)
Restructuring	(12		)	—			1,328			—			93			(12		)	403			1,328
Total operating expenses	8,077			9,253			18,284			19,460
(Gain) on Sinovel settlement, net													(28,720		)	—			(28,720		)	—
Total operating (income) expenses													(21,103		)	8,077			(12,083		)	18,284

Operating loss	(7,805		)	(7,150		)	(22,499		)	(16,494		)
Operating income (loss)													24,727			(7,805		)	19,600			(22,499		)

Change in fair value of warrants	144			1,244			1,069			567			282			144			(182		)	1,069
Gain on sale of minority interest	951			—			951			—			—			951			—			951
Interest income (expense), net	54			(107		)	45			(243		)
Other expense, net	(796		)	(518		)	(2,170		)	(393		)
Loss before income tax (benefit) expense	(7,452		)	(6,531		)	(22,604		)	(16,563		)
Interest income, net													232			54			433			45
Other income (expense), net													325			(796		)	934			(2,170		)
Income (loss) before income tax (benefit) expense													25,566			(7,452		)	20,785			(22,604		)

Income tax (benefit) expense	(171		)	794			(71		)	1,117
Income tax expense (benefit)													3,008			(171		)	2,964			(71		)

Net loss	$	(7,281	)	$	(7,325	)	$	(22,533	)	$	(17,680	)
Net income (loss)													$	22,558		$	(7,281	)	$	17,821		$	(22,533	)

Net loss per common share
Net income (loss) per common share
Basic	$	(0.38	)	$	(0.53	)	$	(1.26	)	$	(1.29	)	$	1.11		$	(0.38	)	$	0.88		$	(1.26	)
Diluted	$	(0.38	)	$	(0.53	)	$	(1.26	)	$	(1.29	)	$	1.10		$	(0.38	)	$	0.87		$	(1.26	)

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding
Basic	19,060			13,769			17,925			13,723			20,313			19,060			20,240			17,925
Diluted	19,060			13,769			17,925			13,723			20,581			19,060			20,560			17,925

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORPORATION

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE ~~LOSS~~INCOME (LOSS)

(In thousands)


	Three months ended September 30,						Six months ended September 30,						Three months ended September 30,						Six months ended September 30,
	2017			2016			2017			2016			2018			2017			2018			2017
Net loss	$	(7,281	)	$	(7,325	)	$	(22,533	)	$	(17,680	)
Net income (loss)													$	22,558		$	(7,281	)	$	17,821		$	(22,533	)
Other comprehensive gain (loss), net of tax:
Foreign currency translation gain (loss)	401			111			1,221			(541		)	(678		)	401			(894		)	1,221
Total other comprehensive gain (loss), net of tax	401			111			1,221			(541		)	(678		)	401			(894		)	1,221
Comprehensive loss	$	(6,880	)	$	(7,214	)	$	(21,312	)	$	(18,221	)
Comprehensive income (loss)													$	21,880		$	(6,880	)	$	16,927		$	(21,312	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORPORATION

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In thousands)


	Six months ended September 30,						Six months ended September 30,
	2017			2016			2018			2017
Cash flows from operating activities:

Net loss	$	(22,533	)	$	(17,680	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operations:
Net income (loss)							$	17,821		$	(22,533	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash used in operations:
Depreciation and amortization	7,682			3,735			2,307			7,682
Stock-based compensation expense	1,232			1,653			1,610			1,232
Provision for excess and obsolete inventory	351			671			514			351
Gain on sale of minority interest	(951		)	—
Change in fair value of warrants and contingent consideration	(1,270		)	(567		)
Non-cash interest expense	19			98
(Gain) on sale of minority interest							—			(951		)
Change in fair value of warrants							182			(1,270		)
Non-cash interest (income) expense							(112		)	19
Other non-cash items	(97		)	(103		)	(727		)	(97		)
Changes in operating asset and liability accounts:
Accounts receivable	124			7,118			(279		)	124
Inventory	1,354			(8,696		)	1,278			1,354
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	85			2,843			(572		)	85
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	(770		)	(4,481		)	2,166			(770		)
Deferred revenue	1,235			4,497			(593		)	1,235
Net cash used in operating activities	(13,539		)	(10,912		)
Net cash provided by/(used in) operating activities							23,595			(13,539		)

Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchase of property, plant and equipment	(483		)	(359		)	(418		)	(483		)
Proceeds from the sale of property, plant and equipment	12			15			138			12
Change in restricted cash	795			4
Cash paid for acquisition, net of cash acquired	134			—			—			134
Proceeds from sale of minority interest	951			—			—			951
Change in other assets	(130		)	(28		)	(131		)	(130		)
Net cash provided by/(used in) investing activities	1,279			(368		)	(411		)	484

Cash flows from financing activities:
Employee taxes paid related to net settlement of equity awards	(274		)	(490		)	(396		)	(274		)
Repayment of debt	(1,575		)	(2,000		)	—			(1,575		)
Proceeds from public equity offering, net	16,952			—			—			16,952
Proceeds from exercise of employee stock options and ESPP	85			—			71			85
Net cash provided by/(used in) financing activities	15,188			(2,490		)	(325		)	15,188

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents	608			(298		)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash							(774		)	608

Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	3,536			(14,068		)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year	26,784			39,330
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year	$	30,320		$	25,262
Net increase in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash							22,085			2,741
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of period							34,249			27,744
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of period							$	56,334		$	30,485

Supplemental schedule of cash flow information:
Issuance of common stock in connection with the purchase of Infinia Technology Corporation	$	3,557		$	—		$	—		$	3,557
Cash paid for income taxes, net of refunds	753			894			1,438			753
Issuance of common stock to settle liabilities	185			212			172			185
Cash paid for interest	42			187			—			42

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORPORATION

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. Nature of the Business and Operations and Liquidity

Nature of the Business and Operations

American Superconductor Corporation (“AMSC” or the “Company”) was founded on April 9, 1987. The Company is a leading provider of megawatt-scale solutions that lower the cost of wind power and enhance the performance of the power grid. In the wind power market, the Company enables manufacturers to field wind turbines through its advanced engineering, support services and power electronics products. In the power grid market, the Company enables electric utilities and renewable energy project developers to connect, transmit and distribute power through its transmission planning services and power electronics and superconductor-based products. The Company’s wind and power grid products and services provide exceptional reliability, security, efficiency and affordability to its customers.

These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared on a going concern basis in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) and the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (“SEC”) instructions to Form 10-Q. The going concern basis of presentation assumes that the Company will continue operations and will be able to realize its assets and discharge its liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in the financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been condensed or omitted pursuant to those instructions. The year-end condensed balance sheet data was derived from audited financial statements but does not include all disclosures required by GAAP. The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements, in the opinion of management, reflect all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair statement of the results for the interim periods ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016~~2017 and the financial position at September 30, ~~2017.~~2018; however, these results are not necessarily indicative of results which may be expected for the full year. The interim condensed consolidated financial statements, and notes thereto, should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended March 31, 2018, and notes thereto, included in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2018 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 6, 2018.

Liquidity

The Company has experienced recurring operating losses and as of September 30, ~~2017,~~2018, the Company had an accumulated deficit of ~~$978.1~~$970.5 million. In addition, the Company has experienced recurring negative operating cash flows. At September 30, ~~2017,~~2018, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of ~~$30.3~~$56.2 million, with no outstanding ~~debt.~~debt other than ordinary trade payables. Cash ~~used in~~provided by operations for the six months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 was ~~$13.5~~$23.6 million. The current period results include the net gain received from the first installment of the Sinovel settlement of $28.7 million in the three month period ended September 30, 2018.

From April 1, 2011 through the date of this filing, the Company has reduced its global workforce substantially, including a restructuring action announced on April 4, 2017 which led to a $1.3 million restructuring charge in the six months ended September 30, 2017. See Note 15 "Restructuring" for further discussion of this action. The Company has taken actions to consolidate certain business operations to reduce facility costs.substantially. As of September 30, ~~2017,~~2018, the Company had a global workforce of ~~321~~225 persons. The Company plans to closely monitor its expenses and, if required, expects to further reduce operating costs and capital spending to enhance liquidity.

Over the last several years, the Company has entered into several debt and equity financing arrangements in order to ~~enhance liquidity.~~raise capital. Since April 1, 2012, the Company has generated aggregate cash flows from financing activities of ~~$85.1~~$84.9 million. Included in this amount are proceeds of approximately $17.0 million after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and offering expenses payable by the Company, from the Company's equity offering completed on May 10, 2017, which includes the subsequent exercise by the underwriters of their option in full to purchase additional shares. The Company terminated its At Market Issuance Sales Agreement ("ATM") with FBR Capital Markets & Co. in conjunction with this equity offering. See Note ~~13 “Stockholder's~~14 “Stockholders' Equity” for further discussion of these financing arrangements.

On July 3, 2018, the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries Suzhou AMSC Superconductor Co. Ltd. (“AMSC China”) and AMSC Austria GMBH (“AMSC Austria”) entered into a settlement agreement (the “Settlement Agreement”) with Sinovel Wind Group Co., Ltd. (“Sinovel”). The Settlement Agreement settles the litigation and arbitration proceedings between the Company and Sinovel, as further described in Note 15 “Commitments and Contingencies". Under the terms of the Settlement Agreement, Sinovel has agreed to pay AMSC China an aggregate cash amount in Renminbi ("RMB") equivalent to $57.5 million, consisting of two installments. Sinovel paid the first installment of $32.5 million on July 4, 2018, which was repatriated to the Company during the six months ended September 30, 2018, and has agreed to pay the second installment of $25.0 million (the “Second Payment”) within ten (10) months after the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin (the “District Court”) delivers the first sentence against Sinovel in the criminal case entitled United States v. Sinovel Wind Co., Ltd., Case Number 3:13-

cr-00084-jdp. On July 6, 2018, the District Court delivered such sentence, and therefore the Second Payment is due by May 6, 2019 (the “Second Payment Due Date”).

On February 1, 2018, ASC Devens LLC (the "Seller"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, entered into a Purchase and Sale Agreement (the “PSA”) with 64 Jackson, LLC (the “Purchaser”) and Stewart Title Guaranty Company (“Escrow Agent”), to effectuate the sale of certain real property located at 64 Jackson Road, Devens, Massachusetts, including the building that had served as the Company’s headquarters (collectively, the “Property”), in exchange for total consideration of $23.0 million, composed of (i) cash consideration of $17.0 million, and (ii) a $6.0 million subordinated secured commercial promissory note payable to the Company (the "Seller Note"). Subsequently, the Seller, the Purchaser and Jackson 64 MGI, LLC (“Assignee”) entered into an Assignment of Purchase and Sale Agreement (the “Assignment Agreement”), pursuant to which the Purchaser assigned all of its rights and interests in the PSA to the Assignee and the Assignee agreed to assume all of the Purchaser’s obligations and liabilities under the PSA. The transaction closed on March 28, 2018, at which time the Company received, from the Assignee, cash consideration, net of certain agreed upon closing costs, of $16.9 million, and the Seller Note at an interest rate of 1.96%. The Seller Note is secured by a subordinated second mortgage on the Property and a subordinated second assignment of leases and rents.

In December 2015, the Company entered into a set of strategic agreements valued at approximately $210.0 million with Inox Wind Ltd. (“Inox” or "Inox Wind"), which includes a multi-year supply contract pursuant to which the Company will supply ~~electric~~electrical control systems to Inox and a license agreement allowing Inox to manufacture a limited number of electrical control systems. After Inox purchases the specified number of electrical control systems required under the terms of the supply contract, Inox agreed that the Company will continue as Inox’s preferred supplier and Inox will be required to purchase from the Company a majority of its ~~electric~~electrical control systems requirements for an additional three-year period.

The Company believes that based on the information presented above and its quarterly management assessment, it has sufficient liquidity to fund its operations and capital expenditures for the next twelve months following the issuance of the financial statements for the three and six months ended September 30, ~~2017.~~2018. The Company’s liquidity is highly dependent on its ability to increase revenues, including its ability to collect revenues under its agreements with Inox, its ability to control its operating costs, and its ability to raise additional capital, if necessary. There can be no assurance

that the Company will be able to continue to raise additional capital, on favorable terms or at all, from other sources or execute on any other means of improving liquidity described above.

2. Revenue Recognition

On April 1, 2018, the Company adopted Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, and all the related amendments and applied it to all contracts that were not completed as of April 1, 2018 using the modified retrospective method. The Company recognized the cumulative effect of initially applying the new revenue standard as an adjustment of less than $0.1 million to the opening balance of accumulated deficit. Prior period amounts have not been restated and continue to be reported under the accounting standards in effect for those periods.

The adoption of this guidance has led to recognizing certain revenue transactions sooner than in the past on certain contracts, as the Company will need to estimate the revenue it will be entitled to upon contract completion, and later on other contracts, such as Consulting and Statement of Work transactions, due to the lack of an enforceable right to payment for performance obligations satisfied over time, specifically in the technology product line. The Company does not expect a material impact to its consolidated statements of operations on an ongoing basis from the adoption of the new standard.

In addition, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2017-05, Other Income - Gains and Losses from the Derecognition of Non-financial Assets (Subtopic 610-20), in February 2017, to amend ASC 610-20, Other Income - Gains and Losses from the Derecognition of Non-financial Assets (issued at the same time as ASC 606), which provides a model for the measurement and recognition of gains and losses on the sale of non-financial assets, such as property and equipment, including real estate. As a result of adopting ASU 2017-05 on April 1, 2018, the Company recognized an adjustment to the opening balance of accumulated deficit for the deferred gain from the March 28, 2018 sale of the Company's former headquarters in Devens, Massachusetts in the amount of $0.1 million.

The cumulative effect to the Company’s consolidated April 1, 2018 balance sheet from the adoption of the new revenue standard and the sale of nonfinancial assets was as follows (in thousands):



	March 31, 2018			Opening Adjustment			April 1, 2018
Assets:
Accounts Receivable	$	7,365		$	(678	)	$	6,687
Inventory	19,780			(1,599		)	18,181
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	2,947			2,277			5,224
Notes receivable, long term portion	2,559			105			2,664

Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity:
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	(12,625	)	$	(2,729	)	$	(15,354	)
Deferred revenue	(13,483		)	2,657			(10,826		)

Accumulated deficit	$	(988,333	)	$	(33	)	$	(988,366	)

Included in the opening adjustment are reclassifications for accounts receivable, deferred program costs and deferred revenue for previous balances related to agreements that no longer meet the definition of a customer contract under ASC 606. The impact of adoption on the Company’s opening balances and for the three and six months ended September 30, 2018, in all financial statement line items impacted by ASC 606 was immaterial from the amount that would have been reported under the previous guidance.

The Company’s revenues in its Grid segment are derived primarily through transmitting and distributing power, providing planning services that allow it to identify power grid needs and risks, and developing ship protection systems for the U.S. Navy. The Company’s revenues in its Wind segment are derived primarily through supplying advanced power electronics and control systems, licensing our highly engineered wind turbine designs, and providing extensive customer support services to wind turbine manufacturers. The Company records revenue based on a five-step model in accordance with ASC 606. For its customer contracts, the Company identifies the performance obligations, determines the transaction price, allocates the contract transaction price to the performance obligations, and recognizes the revenue when (or as) control of goods or services is transferred to the customer. As of September 30, 2018, 87% of revenue was recognized at the point in time when control transferred to the customer, with the remainder being recognized over time.

In the Company's equipment and system product line, each contract with a customer summarizes each product sold to a customer, which typically represent distinct performance obligations. A contract's transaction price is allocated to each distinct performance obligation using the respective standalone selling price which is determined primarily using the cost plus expected margin approach and recognized as revenue when, or as, the performance obligation is satisfied. The majority of the Company’s product sales transfer control to the customer in line with the contracted delivery terms and revenue is recorded at the point in time when products are transferred to the freight forwarder, as the Company has determined that this is the point in time that control transfers to the customer.

In the Company's service and technology development product line, there are several different types of transactions but each of them begins with a contract with a customer that summarizes each product sold to a customer, which typically represents distinct performance obligations. The technology development transactions are primarily for activities that have no alternative use and for which a profit can be expected throughout the life of the contract. In these cases, the revenue is recognized over time, but in the instances where the profit cannot be assured throughout the entire contract then the revenue is recognized at a point in time. Each contract's transaction price is allocated to each distinct performance obligation using the respective standalone selling price which is determined primarily using the cost plus expected margin approach. The ongoing service transactions are for service contracts that provide benefit to the customer simultaneously as the Company performs its obligations, and therefore this revenue is recognized ratably over time throughout the effective period of these contracts. The transaction prices on these contracts are allocated based on an adjusted market approach which is re-assessed annually for reasonableness. The field service transactions include contracts for delivery of goods and completion of services made at the customer's requests, which are not deemed satisfied until the work has been completed and/or the requested goods have been delivered, so all of this revenue is recognized at the point in time when the control changes, and at allocated prices based on the adjusted market approach driven by standard price lists. The royalty transactions are related to certain contract terms on transactions in the Company's equipment and systems product line based on activity as specified in the contracts. The transaction prices of these agreements are calculated based on an adjusted market approach as specified in the contract. The Company reports royalty revenue for usage-based royalties when the sales have occurred. In circumstances when collectability is not assured and a contract does not exist under ASC 606, revenue is deferred

until a non-refundable payment has been received for substantially all the amount that is due and there are no further remaining performance obligations.

The Company's service contracts can include a purchase order from a customer for specific goods in which each item is a distinct performance obligation satisfied at a point in time at which control of the goods is transferred to the customer which occurs based on the contracted delivery terms or when the requested service work has been completed. The transaction price for these goods is allocated based on the adjusted market approach considering similar transactions under similar circumstances. Service contracts are also derived from ongoing maintenance contracts and extended service-type warranty contracts. In these transactions, the Company is contracted to provide an ongoing service over a specified period of time. As the customer is consuming the benefits as the service is being provided the revenue is recognized over time ratably.

The Company’s policy is to not accept volume discounts, product returns, or rebates and allowances within its contracts. In the event a contract was approved with any of these terms, it would be evaluated for variable consideration, estimated and recorded as a reduction of revenue in the same period the related product revenue was recorded.

The Company provides assurance-type warranties on all product sales for a term of typically one to two years, and extended service-type warranties at the customers’ option for an additional term ranging up to four additional years. The Company accrues for the estimated warranty costs for assurance warranties at the time of sale based on historical warranty experience plus any known or expected changes in warranty exposure. For all extended service-type warranties, the Company recognizes the revenue ratably over time during the effective period of the services.

The Company records revenue net of sales tax, value added tax, excise tax and other taxes collected concurrent with revenue-producing activities. The Company has elected to recognize the cost for freight and shipping when control over the products sold passes to customers and revenue is recognized. The Company has elected to recognize incremental costs of obtaining a contract as expense when incurred except in contracts where the amortization period would exceed twelve months; in such cases the long term amount will be assessed for materiality. The Company has elected to not adjust the promised amount of consideration for the effects of a significant financing component if the period of financing is twelve months or less.

The Company’s contracts with customers do not typically include extended payment terms and may include milestone billing over the life of the contract. Payment terms vary by contract type and type of customer and generally range from 30 to 60 days from delivery.

The following tables disaggregate the Company’s revenue by product line and by shipment destination:



	Three Months Ended September 30, 2018				Six Months Ended September 30, 2018
Product Line:	Grid		Wind		Grid		Wind
Equipment and systems	$	5,503	$	7,219	$	12,957	$	10,711
Services and technology development	2,066		88		3,541		274
Total	$	7,569	$	7,307	$	16,498	$	10,985

Region:
Americas	$	5,052	$	24	$	12,548	$	47
Asia Pacific	2,308		7,278		3,115		10,873
EMEA	209		5		835		65
Total	$	7,569	$	7,307	$	16,498	$	10,985

As of September 30, 2018 and March 31, 2018, the Company’s contract assets and liabilities primarily relate to the timing differences between cash received from a customer in connection with contractual rights to invoicing and the timing of revenue recognition following completion of performance obligations. The Company's accounts receivable balance is made up entirely of customer contract related balances. Changes in the Company’s contract assets, which are included in “Unbilled AR” and "Deferred program costs" (see Note 7, “Accounts Receivable” and Note 8, "Inventory" for a reconciliation to the condensed consolidated balance sheet) and contract liabilities, which are included in the current portion and long term portion of “deferred revenue” in the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheets, are as follows:



	Unbilled AR			Deferred Program Costs			Contract Liabilities
Beginning balance as of March 31, 2018	$	3,016		$	2,567		$	21,937
Impact of adoption of ASC 606	—			(1,599		)	(2,657		)
Increases for costs incurred to fulfill performance obligations	—			1,267			—
Increase (decrease) due to customer billings	(7,886		)	—			7,828
Decrease due to cost recognition on completed performance obligations	—			(1,033		)	—
Increase (decrease) due to recognition of revenue based on transfer of control of performance obligations	7,439			(9		)	(8,296		)
Other changes and FX impact	(19		)	24			(864		)
Ending balance as of September 30, 2018	$	2,550		$	1,217		$	17,948

The Company’s remaining performance obligations represent the unrecognized revenue value of the Company’s contractual commitments. The Company’s performance obligations may vary significantly each reporting period based on the timing of major new contractual commitments. As of September 30, 2018, the Company had outstanding performance obligations on existing contracts under ASC 606 to be recognized in the next twelve months of approximately $52.5 million. There are also approximately $7.1 million of outstanding performance obligations to be recognized over a period of thirteen to sixty months. The remaining performance obligations are subject to customer actions and therefore the timing of revenue recognition cannot be reasonably estimated. The twelve month performance obligations include anticipated shipments to Inox based on the twelve month rolling forecast provided by Inox on the multi-year supply contract. The quantities specified in any forecast provided by Inox related to the multi-year supply contract are firm and irrevocable for the first three months of a twelve month rolling forecast. The timing of the performance obligations beyond the Inox twelve month provided forecast are not determinable and therefore are not included in the total remaining performance obligations.

The following table sets forth customers who represented 10% or more of the Company’s total revenues for the three and six months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017:



	Reportable	Three months ended September 30,				Six months ended September 30,
	Segment	2018		2017		2018		2017
Inox Wind Limited	Wind	45	%	46	%	36	%	35	%
Vestas	Grid	11	%	—	%	23	%	—	%
Quanta Power	Grid	12	%	—	%	<10%		—	%
U.S. Navy	Grid	<10%		—	%	<10%		16	%
YMC Inc.	Grid	—	%	15	%	—	%	<10%

3. Stock-Based Compensation

The Company accounts for its stock-based compensation at fair value. The following table summarizes stock-based compensation expense by financial statement line item for the three and six months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016~~2017 (in thousands):


	Three months ended September 30,				Six months ended September 30,				Three months ended September 30,				Six months ended September 30,
	2017		2016		2017		2016		2018		2017		2018		2017
Cost of revenues	$	23	$	49	$	59	$	99	$	50	$	23	$	90	$	59
Research and development	61		62		110		92		70		61		121		110
Selling, general and administrative	394		542		1,063		1,462		705		394		1,399		1,063
Total	$	478	$	653	$	1,232	$	1,653	$	825	$	478	$	1,610	$	1,232

The Company issued 37,075 shares of immediately vested common stock and 413,000 shares of restricted stock awards during the six months ended September 30, 2018, and issued 37,140 shares of immediately vested common stock and 795,500 shares of restricted stock awards during the six months ended September 30, ~~2017, and issued 35,000 shares of immediately vested common stock, and granted 126,000 restricted stock awards during the six months ended September 30, 2016.~~2017. These restricted stock awards generally vest

over 2-3 years. Awards for restricted stock include both time-based and performance-based awards. For options and restricted stock awards that vest upon the passage of time, expense is being recorded over the vesting period. Performance-based awards are expensed over the requisite service period based on probability of achievement. In addition, the Company issued 16,667 restricted stock units under the 2007 Stock Incentive Plan during the six months ended September 30, 2017, each of which represents the right to receive one share of common stock in connection with a severance agreement entered into with one of the Company's former executive officers. These restricted stock units vested and were settled in shares of common stock on the eighth day after receipt of an irrevocable release.

The estimated fair value of the Company’s stock-based awards, less expected annual forfeitures, is amortized over the awards’ service period. The total unrecognized compensation cost for unvested outstanding stock options was ~~$0.3~~$0.1 million at September 30, ~~2017.~~2018. This expense will be recognized over a weighted average expense period of approximately ~~1.5~~0.5 years. The total unrecognized compensation cost for unvested outstanding restricted stock was $3.6 million at September 30, ~~2017.~~2018. This expense will be recognized over a weighted-average expense period of approximately ~~2.1~~1.9 years.

The Company did not grant any stock options during the three and six months ended September 30, 2018 or 2017. During the six months ended September 30, 2016, the Company granted 9,703 stock options. These options will vest over 2 years. The weighted average assumptions used in the Black Scholes valuation model for stock options granted during the six months ended September 30, 2016 are as follows:.

September 30,
2017 September 30,
2016 September 30,
2017 September 30,
2016
Expected volatility N/A 67.6 % N/A 67.6 %
Risk-free interest rate N/A 1.3 % N/A 1.3 %
Expected life (years) N/A 5.7
N/A 5.7
Dividend yield N/A None
N/A None

3.4. Computation of Net ~~Loss~~Income (Loss) per Common Share

Basic net ~~loss~~income (loss) per share (“EPS”) is computed by dividing net ~~loss~~income (loss) by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Where applicable, diluted EPS is computed by dividing the net ~~loss~~income (loss) by the weighted-average number of common shares and dilutive common equivalent shares outstanding during the period, calculated using the treasury stock method. Common equivalent shares include the effect of restricted stock, exercise of stock options and warrants and contingently issuable shares. For the three months ended September 30, 2018, 1.6 million shares were not included in the calculation of diluted EPS as they were considered anti-dilutive, of which 0.3 million relate to outstanding stock options, 0.9 million relate to outstanding warrants and 0.4 million relate to outstanding awards. For the six months ended September 30, 2018, 1.4 million shares were not included in the calculation of diluted EPS as they were considered anti-dilutive, of which 0.2 million relate to outstanding stock options, 0.9 million relate to outstanding warrants and 0.3 million relate to outstanding awards. For the three and six months ended September 30, 2017, 1.5 million shares were not included in the calculation of diluted EPS as they were considered anti-dilutive, of which 0.3 million relate to outstanding stock options, and 1.2 million relate to outstanding warrants. ~~For the three and six months ended September 30, 2016, 1.6 million shares were not included in~~

~~the calculation of diluted EPS as they were considered anti-dilutive, of which 0.4 million relate to outstanding stock options, and 1.2 million relate to outstanding warrants.~~

The following table reconciles the numerators and denominators of the earnings per share calculation for the three and six months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016~~2017 (in thousands, except per share data):


	Three months ended September 30,						Six months ended September 30,						Three months ended September 30,						Six months ended September 30,
	2017			2016			2017			2016			2018			2017			2018			2017
Numerator:
Net loss	$	(7,281	)	$	(7,325	)	$	(22,533	)	$	(17,680	)
Net income (loss)													$	22,558		$	(7,281	)	$	17,821		$	(22,533	)
Denominator:
Weighted-average shares of common stock outstanding	19,531			14,190			18,316			14,161			21,252			19,531			21,126			18,316
Weighted-average shares subject to repurchase	(471		)	(421		)	(391		)	(438		)	(939		)	(471		)	(886		)	(391		)
Shares used in per-share calculation ― basic	19,060			13,769			17,925			13,723			20,313			19,060			20,240			17,925
Shares used in per-share calculation ― diluted	19,060			13,769			17,925			13,723			20,581			19,060			20,560			17,925
Net loss per share ― basic	$	(0.38	)	$	(0.53	)	$	(1.26	)	$	(1.29	)
Net loss per share ― diluted	$	(0.38	)	$	(0.53	)	$	(1.26	)	$	(1.29	)
Net income (loss) per share ― basic													$	1.11		$	(0.38	)	$	0.88		$	(1.26	)
Net income (loss) per share ― diluted													$	1.10		$	(0.38	)	$	0.87		$	(1.26	)

4.5. Acquisition and Related Goodwill

Acquisition of Infinia Technology Corporation

On September 25, 2017, the Company acquired Infinia Technology Corporation ("ITC") for approximately $3.8 million ~~as described below~~ (the "Acquisition"). Located in Richmond, Washington, ITC is a technology firm founded in 2009 specializing in the design, development and commercialization of cryo-coolers for a wide range of applications.

Pursuant to the terms of the stock purchase agreement ("SPA"), the Company acquired all of the issued and outstanding shares of ITC (the "ITC Shares") from the selling stockholders, for a purchase price of approximately $3.8 million consisting of $0.1 million in cash and 884,890 shares of the Company’s common stock (the "AMSC Shares"), $0.01 par value per share at a per share price of $4.02 on the acquisition date. Under the terms of the SPA, the Company was obligated to file a registration statement (the "Resale Registration Statement") covering the resale of the AMSC Shares by the selling stockholders no later than 10 business days following the closing of the Acquisition, and to use commercially reasonable efforts to cause the Resale Registration Statement to be declared effective by the SEC as soon as practicable thereafter. Additionally, the Company agreed to pay the selling stockholders in cash (the "Make Whole Payment"), if any, equal to (x) an amount equal to (i) the price per AMSC Share pursuant to the terms of the SPA, multiplied by (ii) the number of AMSC Shares sold by the selling stockholders during the first 90 days after the effectiveness of the Resale Registration Statement, minus (y) the aggregate sales proceeds received by the Selling Stockholders from the sale of any AMSC Shares during the first 90 days after the effectiveness of the Resale Registration Statement. The Resale Registration Statement was declared effective on October 23, 2017. The Company has granted a security interest in the ITC Shares to the selling stockholders to secure the Company’s obligation to make any Make Whole Payment. The contingent liability related to the Make Whole Payment was determined under a fair value option based pricing model to be $0.6 million on September 25, 2017.

~~ITC was integrated into~~ This technology supports the Company's ~~Grid business unit. The Acquisition has been accounted for under~~efforts with the ~~purchase method of accounting in accordance with ASU 805, Business Combinations. The Company allocated the purchase price to the assets acquired~~U.S. Navy and liabilities assumed at their estimated fair values as of the date of Acquisition. The Company estimated the fair value of the intangible assets at $3.4 million, which consisted of core-technology and know-how, working capital of $0.2 million and property, plant and equipment of less than $0.1 million. A long-term deferred tax liability of $1.1 million was recorded for the differing book and tax basis of the ITC assets and liabilities. Provisional amounts have been recorded for the related tax activity as of September 30, 2017. Final adjustments are expected to be made during the third quarter of fiscal 2017.

The following table summarizes the consideration paid for ITC and the amounts of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed recognized at the acquisition date, as well as the fair value at the acquisition date of ITC at September 25, 2017 (in millions):Ship Protection Systems (“SPS”) products.

September 25, 2017
Consideration
    Cash $ 0.1
    Equity (884,890 shares of common stock at $4.02 per share) 3.6
    Contingent consideration 0.6
Total Consideration $ 4.3

Recognized amounts of identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed
     Core technology and know-how $ 3.4
     Working capital 0.2
     Property, plant and equipment 0.0
Total identifiable net assets $ 3.6
Long-term deferred tax liability 1.1
Goodwill allocated $ 1.7

The Company valued the Acquisition at $4.2 million (excluding Acquisition costs), using a value of $4.02 per share, which was the closing price of the Company's common stock on the date of Acquisition plus $0.1 million in cash and $0.6 million of contingent consideration for the Make Whole Payment valued as of the closing date. Acquisition costs of less than $0.1 million were recorded in selling, general and administrative costs.

The results of ITC's operations, which were not significant from the date of acquisition until September 30, ~~2017,~~2018, are included in the Company’s consolidated results from the date of Acquisition of September 25, 2017, ~~for the three and six months ended~~through September 30, ~~2017.~~2018. Assuming the Acquisition had occurred on April 1, 2017, ~~and 2016,~~ the impact on the consolidated results of the Company would not have been significant.

Goodwill

At the time of the Acquisition, the Company allocated the purchase price to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at their estimated fair values as of the date of Acquisition. The excess of the purchase price ~~of $1.7 million~~ paid by the Company over the estimated fair value of net assets acquired of $1.7 million has been recorded as goodwill in the Company's Grid segment. Goodwill represents the value associated with the acquired workforce and synergies related to the merger of the two companies.

The guidance under ASC 805-30 provides for the recognition of goodwill on the Acquisition date measured as the excess of the aggregate consideration transferred over the net of the Acquisition date amounts of net assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The fair value of the contingent consideration included in the total consideration transferred was determined using the Black Scholes pricing model, and all other consideration transferred was calculated using its observable market fair value. The tangible net assets acquired fair value was based on observable market fair value. The acquired intangible asset fair value was determined using discounted cash flows under an excess in earnings model.

Goodwill represents the difference between the purchase price and the fair value of the identifiable tangible and intangible net assets when accounted for using the purchase method of accounting. Goodwill is not amortized, but reviewed for impairment. Goodwill is reviewed annually, and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the goodwill might not be recoverable.

The Company early adopted ASU 2017-04 as of September 30, 2017. The Company will perform an annual impairment assessment on goodwill, unless events occur in the interim periods to indicate impairment may have occurred. The Company did not identify any triggering events in the ~~period between the date of Acquisition and~~six months ended September 30, ~~2017, which~~2018, that would require ~~subsequent~~ interim impairment testing of goodwill. As such, the Company expects to perform its annual goodwill impairment test during the fourth fiscal quarter of 2017. The Company will compare the fair value of its reporting unit to its carrying value. If the carrying value of the net assets assigned to the reporting unit exceeds the fair value of the reporting unit, then the Company would record an impairment loss equal to the difference.

5.6. Fair Value Measurements

A valuation hierarchy for disclosure of the inputs to valuation used to measure fair value has been established. This hierarchy prioritizes the inputs into three broad levels as follows:



Level 1	-	Inputs are unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access at the measurement date.

Level 2	-	Inputs include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means (market corroborated inputs).

Level 3	-	Unobservable inputs that reflect the Company’s assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. The Company develops these inputs based on the best information available, including its own data.

The Company provides a gross presentation of activity within Level 3 measurement roll-forward and details of transfers in and out of Level 1 and 2 measurements. A change in the hierarchy of an investment from its current level is reflected in the period during which the pricing methodology of such investment changes. Disclosure of the transfer of securities from Level 1 to Level 2 or Level 3 is made in the event that the related security is significant to total cash and investments. The Company did not have any transfers of assets and liabilities from Level 1, ~~and~~ Level 2 toor Level 3 of the fair value measurement hierarchy during the ~~three and~~ six months ended September 30, ~~2017.~~2018.

A financial asset’s or liability’s classification within the hierarchy is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

The following table provides the assets and liabilities carried at fair value on a recurring basis, measured as of September 30, ~~2017~~2018 and March 31, ~~2017~~2018 (in thousands):


	Total Carrying Value		Quoted Prices in Active Markets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Total Carrying Value		Quoted Prices in Active Markets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
September 30, 2017:
September 30, 2018:
Assets:
Cash equivalents	$	24,392	$	24,392	$	—	$	—	$	46,841	$	46,841	$	—	$	—
Derivative liabilities:
Acquisition contingent consideration	$	370	$	—	$	—	$	370
Warrants	854		—		—		854		1,399		—		—		1,399
Total derivative liabilities	$	1,224	$	—	$	—	$	1,224


	Total Carrying Value		Quoted Prices in Active Markets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Total Carrying Value		Quoted Prices in Active Markets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
March 31, 2017:
March 31, 2018:
Assets:
Cash equivalents	$	14,105	$	14,105	$	—	$	—	$	32,589	$	32,589	$	—	$	—
Derivative liabilities:
Warrants	$	1,923	$	—	$	—	$	1,923	$	1,217	$	—	$	—	$	1,217

The table below reflects the activity for the Company’s major classes of liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis (in thousands):

Warrants Acquisition Contingent Consideration
April 1, 2017 $ 1,923
$ —
Issuance of contingent consideration —
571
Mark to market adjustment (1,069 ) (201 )
Balance at September 30, 2017 $ 854
$ 370



	Warrants
April 1, 2018	$	1,217
Mark to market adjustment	182
Balance at September 30, 2018	$	1,399

Warrants
April 1, 2016 $ 3,227
Mark to market adjustment (1,304 )
Balance at March 31, 2017 $ 1,923



	Warrants			Acquisition Contingent Consideration
April 1, 2017	$	1,923		$	—
Issuance of contingent consideration	—			571
Mark to market adjustment	(1,069		)	(201		)
Balance at September 30, 2017	$	854		$	370

Valuation Techniques

Cash Equivalents

Cash equivalents consist of highly liquid instruments with maturities of three months or less that are regarded as high quality, low risk investments and are measured using such inputs as quoted prices, and are classified within Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy. Cash equivalents consist principally of certificates of deposits and money market accounts.

Warrants

Warrants were issued in conjunction with a Securities Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with Capital Ventures International (“CVI”) ~~in April 2012,~~, an equity offering to Hudson Bay Capital in November 2014, and a Loan and Security Agreement with Hercules Technology Growth Capital, Inc. (“Hercules”) ~~in June 2012 and through subsequent amendments.~~. These warrants issued to CVI expired on October 4, 2017. See Note ~~11, “Debt,” and Note 12~~13 “Warrants and Derivative Liabilities,” for additional information. ~~These~~Outstanding warrants are subject to revaluation at each balance sheet date, and any change in fair value will be recorded as a change in fair value in derivatives and warrants until the earlier of their exercise or expiration.

The Company relies on various assumptions in a lattice model to determine the fair value of warrants. The Company has valued the warrants within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy. See Note ~~12,~~13, “Warrants and Derivative Liabilities,” for a discussion of the warrants and the valuation assumptions used.

Contingent Consideration

Contingent consideration relates to a make whole payment provision set forth in the ~~SPA~~stock purchase agreement ("SPA") for the acquisition of ITC that requires the Company to guarantee the purchase price of the acquisition should the aggregate proceeds of the resale of AMSC shares sold by selling stockholders during the first 90 days after the effectiveness of the ~~Resale Registration Statement~~resale registration statement be less than the agreed upon purchase price for such AMSC ~~Shares~~shares (per the terms of the SPA) sold during such 90 day period. See Note ~~12,~~13, "Warrants and Derivative Liabilities" and Note 4,5, “Acquisition and Related Goodwill” for further discussion. The Company relied on a Black Scholes option pricing method to determine the fair value of the contingent consideration on the date of ~~acquisition and will continue to revalue the fair value~~acquisition. All of the ~~contingent consideration at each subsequent balance sheet date until~~stock related to this liability was sold as of December 5, 2017 and the ~~final settlement date, with~~amount of the ~~change in fair value recorded~~make whole payment provided for in the ~~current period operating loss.~~SPA was calculated to be $0.7 million, and subsequently paid on January 5, 2018.

6.7. Accounts Receivable

Accounts receivable at September 30, ~~2017~~2018 and March 31, ~~2017~~2018 consisted of the following (in thousands):


	September 30, 2017			March 31, 2017			September 30, 2018		March 31, 2018
Accounts receivable (billed)	$	7,620		$	7,436		$	5,072	$	4,403
Accounts receivable (unbilled)	627			574			2,550		3,016
Less: Allowance for doubtful accounts	(54		)	(54		)	—		(54		)
Accounts receivable, net	$	8,193		$	7,956		$	7,622	$	7,365

7.8. Inventory

Inventory, net of reserves, at September 30, ~~2017~~2018 and March 31, ~~2017~~2018 consisted of the following (in thousands):


	September 30, 2017		March 31, 2017		September 30, 2018		March 31, 2018
Raw materials	$	5,776	$	4,263	$	5,996	$	7,526
Work-in-process	1,010		426		2,306		920
Finished goods	6,543		8,016		6,716		8,767
Deferred program costs	2,654		4,757		1,217		2,567
Net inventory	$	15,983	$	17,462	$	16,235	$	19,780

~~The Company recorded inventory write-downs of $0.1 million and $0.4 million for the three and six months ended September 30, 2017.~~ The Company recorded inventory write-downs of $0.4 million and ~~$0.7~~$0.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The Company recorded inventory write-downs of $0.5 million and $0.4 million for the six months ended September 30, ~~2016.~~2018 and 2017, respectively. These write downs were based on evaluating its inventory on hand for excess quantities and obsolescence.

Deferred program costs as of September 30, ~~2017~~2018 and March 31, ~~2017~~2018 primarily represent costs incurred on programs ~~accounted for under contract accounting~~ where the Company needs to complete ~~development milestones~~performance obligations before the related revenue and costs will be recognized.

8.9. Note Receivable

The Company entered into a purchase and sale agreement dated February 1, 2018, for the sale of the Devens facility (including land, building and building improvements) located at 64 Jackson Road, Devens, Massachusetts to 64 Jackson Road, LLC, a limited liability company, in the amount of $23.0 million. The terms for payment included a $1.0 million security deposit, and a note receivable for $6.0 million payable to the Company with the remaining cash net of certain adjustments for closing costs at the date of settlement. The note receivable is due in two $3.0 million installments plus accrued interest at a rate of 1.96% on March 31, 2019 and March 31, 2020. The note is subordinate to East Boston Savings Bank's mortgage on the Devens property.

The note receivable was discounted to its present value of $5.7 million utilizing a discount rate of 6%, which was based on management’s assessment of what an appropriate loan at current market rates would be. The $0.3 million discount was recorded as an offset to the long term portion of the note receivable, and is being amortized to interest income over the term of the note. In addition, the resulting gain of $0.1 million from the sale of the Devens property which was deferred previously was recorded as a component of the cumulative effect of an accounting change upon the adoption of ASU 2017-05 which was issued as a part of ASU 2014-09. This gain was recorded as an offset to the opening accumulated deficit.

Note receivable as of September 30, 2018 and March 31, 2018 consisted of the following (in thousands):



Current assets	September 30, 2018			March 31, 2018
Note receivable, current	$	3,000		$	3,000
Total current note receivable	$	3,000		$	3,000

Long term assets
Note receivable, long term	$	3,000		$	3,000
Note receivable discount	(224		)	(336		)
Deferred gain on sale	—			(105		)
Total long term note receivable	$	2,776		$	2,559

10. Property, Plant and Equipment

The cost and accumulated depreciation of property and equipment at September 30, ~~2017~~2018 and March 31, ~~2017~~2018 are as follows (in thousands):


	September 30, 2017			March 31, 2017			September 30, 2018			March 31, 2018
Land	$	3,643		$	3,643
Construction in progress - equipment	606			601			597			654
Buildings	34,549			34,549
Equipment and software	73,798			73,445			45,797			72,760
Furniture and fixtures	1,154			1,201			1,307			1,878
Leasehold improvements	1,912			2,442			1,838			1,426
Property, plant and equipment, gross	115,662			115,881			49,539			76,718
Less accumulated depreciation	(79,224		)	(72,443		)	(38,957		)	(64,205		)
Property, plant and equipment, net	$	36,438		$	43,438		$	10,582		$	12,513

Depreciation expense was $1.1 million and $3.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Depreciation expense was $2.1 million and $7.5 million for the ~~three and~~ six months ended September 30, ~~2017. Depreciation expense was $1.7 million~~2018 and ~~$3.5 million for the three and six months ended September 30, 2016.~~2017, respectively. Included in depreciation expense for the three and six months ended September 30, 2017 is $1.6 million and $4.1 million, respectively, of accelerated depreciation recorded to cost of revenues related to revised estimates of the remaining useful lives of certain pieces of manufacturing equipment. Construction in progress - equipment primarily includes capital investments in the Company's newly leased facility in Ayer, Massachusetts.

9.11. Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses

Accounts payable and accrued expenses at September 30, ~~2017~~2018 and March 31, ~~2017~~2018 consisted of the following (in thousands):


	September 30, 2017		March 31, 2017		September 30, 2018		March 31, 2018
Accounts payable	$	4,089	$	3,207	$	3,934	$	3,096
Accrued inventories in-transit	86		313		411		1,207
Accrued other miscellaneous expenses	1,628		2,240		2,836		2,412
Accrued restructuring	493		—
Advanced deposits					890		—
Accrued compensation	3,674		5,042		3,424		3,605
Income taxes payable	2,194		1,344		2,049		536
Accrued warranty	1,852		2,344		1,760		1,769
Total	$	14,016	$	14,490	$	15,304	$	12,625

The Company generally provides a one to ~~three~~two year warranty on its products, commencing upon ~~installation.~~delivery or installation where applicable. A provision is recorded upon revenue recognition to cost of revenues for estimated warranty expense based on historical experience.

Product warranty activity was as follows (in thousands):


	Three months ended September 30,						Six months ended September 30,						Three months ended September 30,						Six months ended September 30,
	2017			2016			2017			2016			2018			2017			2018			2017
Balance at beginning of period	$	2,026		$	2,774		$	2,344		$	3,601		$	1,752		$	2,026		$	1,769		$	2,344
Change in accruals for warranties during the period	86			316			127			417			213			86			317			127
Settlements during the period	(260		)	(396		)	(619		)	(1,324		)	(205		)	(260		)	(326		)	(619		)
Balance at end of period	$	1,852		$	2,694		$	1,852		$	2,694		$	1,760		$	1,852		$	1,760		$	1,852

~~10.~~12. Income Taxes

The Company recorded an income tax ~~benefits~~expense of $3.0 million in each of the three and six months ended September 30, 2018. The Company recorded income tax benefit of $0.2 million and $0.1 million in the three and six months ended September 30, 2017. ~~The Company recorded income tax expenses~~

On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of ~~$0.8 million and $1.1 million in the three and six months ended September 30, 2016, respectively.~~

As a result of purchase accounting for the acquired intangible assets in the ITC acquisition, the Company recorded a deferred tax liability of $1.1 million for the difference in book and tax basis. As a result, the Company2017 (the “Act”) was ~~able to benefit additional~~signed into law. ASC Topic 740 requires deferred tax assets and ~~therefore released~~liabilities to be measured using the enacted rate for the period in which they are expected to reverse. Accordingly, the new 21% U.S. Federal corporate tax rate was used to measure the U.S. deferred tax assets and liabilities that will reverse in future periods. The Company's deferred tax attributes are generally subject to a ~~corresponding~~full valuation allowance in the U.S. and thus, this adjustment to the attributes did not impact the tax provision. In addition, the new legislation includes a one-time transition tax in which all foreign earnings are deemed to be repatriated to the U.S. and taxable at specified rates included within the Act. The Company reviewed the accumulated foreign earnings aggregated across all non U.S. subsidiaries, net of ~~$1.1 million during~~foreign deficits. The Company believes it is in an aggregate net foreign deficit position for U.S. tax purposes and therefore not liable for the ~~three months ended~~transition tax. The SEC staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118, which provides guidance for companies that have not completed their accounting for the income tax effects of the Act in the period of enactment, allowing for a measurement period of up to one year after the enactment date to finalize the recording of the related tax impacts. The Company made reasonable estimates and does not anticipate significant revisions to the accounting for the tax impact of the Act, but has not completed the accounting for the tax effects of the Act at September 30, ~~2017. Goodwill recognized in the acquisition is not deductible for tax purposes.~~

Section 382 of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “IRC”), provides limits on the extent to which a corporation that has undergone an ownership change (as defined in the IRC) can utilize any net operating loss ("NOL") and general business tax credit carryforwards it may have.2018. The Company ~~conducted a study~~will continue to assess its provision for income taxes as future guidance is issued, but does not currently anticipate significant revisions will be necessary. The ultimate impact may differ from the Company's provisional estimates, possibly materially, due to additional analysis, changes in interpretations and assumptions the Company has made, additional regulatory guidance that may be used and actions the Company may take as a result of the ~~Company's May 2017 equity offering~~Act. The accounting is expected to ~~determine whether Section 382 could limit~~be complete within the ~~use of its carryforwards~~one year measurement period in ~~this manner. After completing this study,~~accordance with the Company has concluded that the limitation will not have a material impact on its ability to utilize its NOL carryforwards. If there were material ownership changes subsequent to the study, such changes could limit the Company's ability to utilize its NOL carryforwards. The Company increased its NOL’s by $0.3 million due to acquired lossesmeasurement period guidance outlined in ~~the three months ended September 30, 2017 from ITC. Utilization of these losses by the Company will need further evaluation and may be subject to annual limitations under Section 382.~~Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118.

Accounting for income taxes requires a two-step approach to recognizing and measuring uncertain tax positions. The first step is to evaluate the tax position for recognition by determining if, based on the technical merits, it is more likely than not the position will be sustained upon audit, including resolution of related appeals or litigation processes, if any. The second step is to measure the tax benefit as the largest amount that is more than 50% likely to be realized upon ultimate settlement. The Company re-evaluates these uncertain tax positions on a quarterly basis. The evaluation is based on factors including, but not limited to, changes in facts or circumstances, changes in tax law, effectively settled issues under audit and new audit activity. Any changes in these factors could result in the recognition of a tax benefit or an additional charge to the tax provision. The Company did not identify any uncertain tax positions in the six months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 and did not have any gross unrecognized tax benefits as of March 31, ~~2017.~~

~~11. Debt~~

~~Senior Secured Term Loans~~

On December 19, 2014, the Company entered into a second amendment to its Loan and Security Agreement with Hercules (the “Hercules Second Amendment”) and entered into a new term loan, borrowing an additional $1.5 million (the “Term Loan C”). After closing fees and expenses, the net proceeds to the Company for the Term Loan C were $1.4 million. The Company made interest only payments at an interest rate of 11% through March 16, 2017 when the interest rate was increased to 11.25%, until maturity on June 1, 2017, when Term Loan C was repaid in its entirety.

Hercules received warrants to purchase 13,927 shares of common stock (the “First Warrant”) and 25,641 shares of common stock (the “Second Warrant”) in conjunction with prior term loans that have been repaid in full. Due to certain adjustment provisions within the warrants, they qualified for liability accounting. The fair value of the warrants, $0.4 million and $0.2 million, respectively, was recorded upon issuance to debt discount and a warrant liability. In conjunction with the Hercules Second Amendment, the First Warrant and Second Warrant were canceled and replaced with the issuance of a new warrant (the “Hercules Warrant”) to purchase 58,823 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $7.85 per share, subject to certain price-based and other anti-dilution adjustments. The Hercules Warrant expires on June 30, 2020. See Note 12, “Warrants and Derivative Liabilities”, for a discussion on the Hercules Warrant and the valuation assumptions used.

Interest expense on the Term Loans for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, was less than $0.1 million. Included in both periods was less than $0.1 million of non-cash interest expense related to the amortization of the debt discount on the respective Term Loans. Interest expense on the Term Loans for the six months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, was less than $0.1 million and $0.3 million, respectively. Included in both periods was less than $0.1 million of non-cash interest expense related to the amortization of debt discount on the respective Term Loans.2018.

~~12.~~13. Warrants and Derivative Liabilities

The Company accounts for its warrants and contingent consideration as liabilities due to certain adjustment provisions within the instruments, which require that they be recorded at fair value. The warrants are subject to revaluation at each balance sheet date and any change in fair value is recorded as a change in fair value of warrants until the earlier of its expiration or its exercise at which time the warrant liability will be reclassified to equity. The Company calculated the fair value of the warrants utilizing an integrated lattice model. The contingent consideration is subject to revaluation at each balance sheet date and any change in fair value is recorded as a change in fair value of contingent consideration until the earlier of its settlement or expiration. The Company determined the fair value of the contingent consideration utilizing a Black Scholes option pricing method. See Note 5,6, "Fair Value Measurements", for further discussion.

~~Senior Convertible Note Warrant~~Hercules Warrants

~~On April 4, 2012, the~~The Company ~~entered into a Purchase Agreement with Capital Ventures International ("CVI"). The Purchase Agreement included a warrant~~issued Hercules warrants to purchase ~~309,406~~13,927 shares of ~~the Company’s~~ common stock (the ~~“Original~~“First Warrant”)~~. Pursuant to an exchange~~ and 25,641 shares of common stock (the “Second Warrant”) in ~~October 2013, the Original Warrant was exchanged for a new warrant (the “Exchanged Warrant”). The Exchanged Warrant expired on October 4, 2017.~~

~~Following is a summary of the key assumptions used to calculate the fair value of the Exchanged Warrant:~~

Fiscal Year 17 September 30,
2017 June 30,
2017
Risk-free interest rate 1.05% 1.05%
Expected annual dividend yield — —
Expected volatility 77.95% 78.25%
Term (years) 0.01 0.26
Fair value $— $—

Fiscal Year 16
March 31,
2017

December 31,
2016

September 30,
2016

June 30,
2016
March 31,
2016
Risk-free interest rate 0.91% 0.56% 0.59% 0.48% 0.66%
Expected annual dividend yield — — — — —
Expected volatility 44.12% 58.04% 70.50% 76.30% 76.76%
Term (years) 0.51 0.76 1.01 1.26 1.51
Fair value $— $0.1 million $0.2 million $0.4 million $0.4 million

~~The Company recorded no change~~conjunction with prior term loans that have been repaid in the fair value of the Exchanged Warrant during the three and six months ended September 30, 2017. The Company recorded net gains of $0.2 million resulting from a decrease in the fair value of the Exchanged Warrant in each of the three and six months ended September 30, 2016, respectively.

~~Hercules Warrant~~

full. On December 19, 2014, the Company entered into a second amendment to the Loan and Security Agreement with Hercules (the "Hercules Second ~~Amendment. See Note 11, “Debt” for additional information.~~

Amendment"). In conjunction with the ~~agreement,~~Hercules Second Amendment, the Company issued ~~the~~ Hercules ~~Warrant~~a warrant to purchase 58,823 shares of the Company’s common ~~stock.~~stock (the "Hercules Second Amendment")which replaced the First Warrant and the Second Warrant. The Hercules Warrant is exercisable at any time after its issuance at an exercise price of $7.85 per share, subject to certain price-based and other anti-dilution adjustments, including the equity offering in May 2017, the acquisition of ITC with common stock in September 2017 and sales of common stock under the ATM entered into in January 2017, and expires on June 30, 2020.

~~Following is~~This warrant had a ~~summary of the key assumptions used to calculate the~~ fair value of ~~the Hercules Warrant:~~

Fiscal Year 17 September 30,
2017 June 30,
2017
Risk-free interest rate 1.56% 1.58%
Expected annual dividend yield — —
Expected volatility 63.97% 67.76%
Term (years) 2.72 2.97
Fair value $0.1 million $0.1 million

Fiscal Year 16
March 31,
2017

December 31,
2016

September 30,
2016

June 30,
2016
March 31,
2016
Risk-free interest rate 1.55% 1.57% 0.97% 0.86% 1.08%
Expected annual dividend yield — — — — —
Expected volatility 66.51% 67.28% 67.98% 68.34% 70.25%
Term (years) 3.25 3.50 3.75 4.00 4.25
Fair value $0.2 million $0.2 million $0.2 million $0.3 million $0.2 million

~~The Company recorded no change, and a net gain, resulting from a decrease of~~ $0.1 million ~~in the fair value~~as of ~~the Hercules Warrant during the three and six months ended~~ September 30, ~~2017, respectively. The Company recorded a net loss~~2018 and ~~a net gain, resulting from an increase and a decrease in the fair value of the Hercules Warrant of less than $0.1 million during the three and six months ended September 30, 2016, respectively.~~March 31, 2018.

November 2014 Warrant

On November 13, 2014, the Company completed an offering of 909,090 units of the Company’s common stock with Hudson Bay Capital. Each unit consisted of one share of the Company’s common stock and 0.9 of a warrant to purchase one share of common stock, or a warrant to purchase in the aggregate 818,181 shares (the “November 2014 Warrant”). The November 2014 Warrant is exercisable at any time, at an exercise price equal to $7.81 per share, subject to certain price-based and other anti-dilution adjustments including those noted above, and expires on November 13, 2019.

Following is a summary of the key assumptions used to calculate the fair value of the November 2014 Warrant:



Fiscal Year 18	September 30, 2018	June 30, 2018
Risk-free interest rate	2.62%	2.40%
Expected annual dividend yield	—	—
Expected volatility	63.66%	67.40%
Term (years)	1.12	1.37
Fair value	$1.3 million	$1.6 million


Fiscal Year 17	September 30, 2017	June 30, 2017	March 31, 2018	December 31, 2017	September 30, 2017	June 30, 2017	March 31, 2017
Risk-free interest rate	1.49%	1.44%	2.20%	1.87%	1.49%	1.44%	1.41%
Expected annual dividend yield	—		—	—	—	—	—
Expected volatility	65.64%	67.21%	65.86%	65.86%	65.64%	67.21%	66.53%
Term (years)	2.12	2.37	1.62	1.87	2.12	2.37	2.62
Fair value	$0.8 million	$0.9 million	$1.1 million	$0.4 million	$0.8 million	$0.9 million	$1.8 million

Fiscal Year 16
March 31,
2017

December 31,
2016

September 30,
2016

June 30,
2016
March 31,
2016
Risk-free interest rate 1.41% 1.43% 0.93% 0.77% 0.98%
Expected annual dividend yield — — — — —
Expected volatility 66.53% 69.31% 68.96% 70.01% 69.88%
Term (years) 2.62 2.87 3.12 3.37 3.62
Fair value $1.8 million $2.3 million $2.3 million $3.2 million $2.6 million

The Company recorded a net gain of $0.3 million and a net loss of $0.2 million resulting from the changes in the fair value of the November 2014 Warrant during the three and six months ended September 30, 2018, respectively. The Company recorded net gains of $0.1 million and $1.0 million, resulting from athe decrease in the fair value of the November 2014 Warrant induring the three and six months ended September 30, 2017, respectively. ~~The Company recorded net gains, resulting from decreases in the fair value of the November 2014 Warrant of $0.9 million and $0.3 million in the three and six months ended September 30, 2016.~~

~~Contingent Consideration~~

The Company evaluated the ITC acquisition make whole payment set forth in the SPA (see Note 5, "Fair Value Measurements" for further details), which may require net settlement cash, and determined the contingent consideration qualified for liability classification and derivative treatment under ASC 815. As a result, for each period the fair value of the contingent consideration will be remeasured and the resulting gain or loss will be recognized in operating expenses until the liability is settled.

~~Following is a summary of the key assumptions used to calculate the fair value of the contingent consideration related to the ITC acquisition:~~

Fiscal Year 17 September 30,
2017 September 25,
2017
Risk-free interest rate 1.09% 1.09%
Expected annual dividend yield — —
Expected volatility 66.54% 65.71%
Term (years) 0.31 0.32
Fair value $0.4 million $0.6 million

~~The Company recorded a net gain of $0.2 million resulting from a decrease in the fair value of the contingent consideration in the three and six months ended September 30, 2017.~~

~~13.~~14. Stockholders’ Equity

Equity Offerings

On May 5, 2017, the Company entered into an underwriting agreement with Oppenheimer & Co. Inc., as representative of several underwriters named therein, relating to the issuance and sale (the "Offering") of 4.0 million shares of the Company's common stock at a public offering price of $4.00 per share. The net proceeds to the Company from the Offering were approximately $14.7 million, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and offering expenses payable by the Company. The

Offering closed on May 10, 2017. In addition, the Company granted the underwriters a 30-day option (the “Option”) to purchase up to an additional 600,000 shares of common stock at the same public offering price. On May 24, 2017, the underwriters notified the Company that they had exercised their Option in ~~full, their Option.~~full. The net proceeds to the Company from the Option were approximately $2.3 million, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and offering expenses payable by the Company. The total net proceeds to the Company from the Offering and the Option were approximately $17.0 million, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and offering expenses payable by the Company. The Option closed on May 26, 2017.

~~ATM Arrangement~~

~~On January 27, 2017,~~ In conjunction with the equity offering, the Company ~~entered into an~~terminated a previous At Market Issuance Sales Agreement ("~~ATM"), pursuant to which,~~ATM) with FBR Capital Markets & Co. where the Company could, at its discretion, sell up to $10.0 million of the Company’s common stock through its sales agent, FBR Capital Markets & Co. ("FBR"). Sales of common stock made under the ATM were made pursuant to the prospectus supplement dated January 27, 2017, which supplements the prospectus dated October 1, 2014, included in the shelf registration statement that AMSC filed with the SEC on September 19, 2014.

During the year ended March 31, 2017, the Company received net proceeds of $2.5 million, from sales of approximately 379,693 shares of its common stock at an average sales price of approximately $6.79 per share under the ATM. No sales of the Company's common ~~stock were made under the ATM after March 31, 2017. On May 4, 2017, the Company provided to FBR a notice of termination of the ATM.~~stock.

~~Stock Purchase Agreement~~

On September 25, 2017, the Company entered into the SPA with ITC. The purchase price was approximately $3.8 million, consisting of 884,890 AMSC Shares and $0.1 million in cash. See Note 4, “Acquisition and Related Goodwill” for further discussion.

~~14.~~15. Commitments and Contingencies

Legal Contingencies

From time to time, the Company is involved in legal and administrative proceedings and claims of various types. The Company records a liability in its consolidated financial statements for these matters when a loss is known or considered probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated. The Company reviews these estimates each accounting period as additional information is known and adjusts the loss provision when appropriate. If a matter is both probable to result in a liability and the amounts of loss can be reasonably estimated, the Company estimates and discloses the possible loss or range of loss to the extent necessary to make the consolidated financial statements not misleading. If the loss is not probable or cannot be reasonably estimated, a liability is not recorded in its consolidated financial statements.

On ~~September 13, 2011,~~July 3, 2018, the Company, ~~commenced a series~~AMSC China and AMSC Austria entered into the Settlement Agreement with Sinovel. The Settlement Agreement settles the litigation and arbitration proceedings between the Company and Sinovel listed on Schedule 2 of ~~legal actions~~the Settlement Agreement (the “Proceedings”), and any other civil claims, counterclaims, causes of action, rights and obligations directly or indirectly relating to the subject matters of the Proceedings and the contracts between the Company and Sinovel listed on Schedules 1 and 4 of the Settlement Agreement (the “Contracts”), subject to the exception described in Section 1.1 of the Settlement Agreement. The Settlement Agreement was filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 9, 2018.

Under the terms of the Settlement Agreement, Sinovel has agreed to pay AMSC China an aggregate cash amount in RMB equivalent to $57.5 million, consisting of two installments. Sinovel paid the first installment of $32.5 million on July 4, 2018, and has agreed to the Second Payment of $25.0 million within ten (10) months after the District Court delivers the first sentence against Sinovel in the criminal case entitled United States v. Sinovel Wind ~~Group~~ Co., Ltd. ~~(“Sinovel”~~, Case Number 3:13-cr-00084-jdp. On July 6, 2018, the District Court delivered such sentence, and therefore the Second Payment is due by May 6, 2019. Mr. Wenyuan Wei, former Sinovel chairman and a current Sinovel shareholder, has delivered a letter of guarantee (the “Guarantee”) to the Company for the Second Payment should Sinovel fail to make such payment by the Second Payment Due Date.

In addition, pursuant to the terms of the Settlement Agreement, the Company and AMSC Austria have granted Sinovel a non-exclusive license for certain AMSC intellectual property to be used solely in Sinovel’s doubly fed wind turbines (the “License”). AMSC has agreed not to sue Sinovel, Sinovel’s power converter suppliers or Sinovel’s customers for use of the technology covered by the License. In the event that Sinovel or Mr. Wei does not make the Second Payment by the Second Payment Due Date, the Settlement Agreement provides that the License will terminate.

The ~~Company’s~~Company and Sinovel have submitted withdrawal applications to terminate the Proceedings to the relevant Chinese ~~subsidiary, Suzhou AMSC Superconductor Co. Ltd., filed a claim for arbitration with~~courts and the Beijing Arbitration ~~Commission in accordance~~Commission. Subject to the Company and Sinovel complying with the terms of the ~~Company’s supply contracts with Sinovel. The case is captioned~~ ~~(2011) Jing Zhong An Zi No. 963. The Company alleges that Sinovel committed various material breaches of its contracts with~~Settlement Agreement, the Company and Sinovel ~~has refused~~have agreed not to ~~pay past due amounts for prior shipments~~re-institute any of ~~core electrical components~~the Proceedings. In addition, the Company and ~~spare parts.~~ Sinovel have agreed to a mutual release and covenant not to sue covering all subject matters of the Proceedings and Contracts, effective upon the completion of the Second Payment.

The Company first considered the Settlement under ASC 606 to determine if the arrangement qualified for revenue accounting under ASC 606. As Sinovel is ~~seeking compensation for past product shipments and retention (including interest) in~~not considered a customer that the ~~amount of approximately RMB 485 million (approximately $73 million) due to Sinovel’s breaches of its contracts. The~~ Company is ~~also seeking specific performance~~supplying goods or services to under ordinary terms, and the Settlement was a negotiation intended to release claims by both parties rather than for the procurement of ~~its existing contracts~~product or services, the proceeds from the Settlement will not be treated as ~~well~~revenue and will be reported as ~~reimbursement~~other income, net of ~~all costs and reasonable~~direct expenses, ~~with respect to the arbitration. The value of the undelivered components under the existing contracts, including the deliveries refused by Sinovel~~separately in ~~March 2011, amounts to approximately RMB 4.6 billion (approximately $691 million).~~

~~On October 8, 2011, Sinovel filed with the Beijing Arbitration Commission an application under the caption~~ ~~(2011) Jing Zhong An Zi No. 963,~~ for a counterclaim against the Company for breach of the same contracts under which the Company filed its original arbitration claim. Sinovel claims, among other things, that the goods supplied by the Company do not conform to the standards specified in the contracts and claims damages in the amount of approximately RMB 1.2 billion (approximately $180 million) upon Sinovel’s requests for change of counterclaim. On February 27, 2012, Sinovel filed with the Beijing Arbitration Commission an application under the caption ~~(2012) Jing Zhong An Zi No. 157,~~ against the Company for breach of the same contracts under which the Company filed its original arbitration claim. Sinovel claims, among other things, that the goods supplied by the Company do not conform to the standards specified in the contracts and claims damages in the amount of approximately RMB 105 million (approximately $16 million)Operating Income (Expense). The ~~Company believes that Sinovel’s claims are without merit and it intends to~~

~~defend these actions vigorously. Since the proceedings~~Second Payment will be recorded in ~~this matter are still in the early technical review phase, the Company cannot reasonably estimate possible losses or range of losses at this time.~~a similar manner when received.

Other

The Company enters into long-term construction contracts with customers that require the Company to obtain performance bonds. The Company is required to deposit an amount equivalent to some or all the face amount of the performance bonds into an escrow account until the termination of the bond. When the performance conditions are met, amounts deposited as collateral for the performance bonds are returned to the Company. In addition, the Company has various contractual arrangements in which minimum quantities of goods or services have been committed to be purchased on an annual basis.

As of September 30, ~~2017,~~2018, the Company had $0.2 million of restricted cash included in long-term assets. These amounts included in restricted cash primarily represent deposits to secure letters of credit for various supply contracts. These deposits are held in interest bearing accounts.

During the three months ended September 30, 2017 the Company received $1.0 million related to the achievement of certain milestones following the previous sale of the Company's minority interest in Blade Dynamics.

On September 25, 2017, the Company acquired ITC for a purchase price of approximately $3.8 million, consisting of $0.1 million in cash and the AMSC Shares. The Company has agreed to pay certain selling stockholders the Make Whole Payment if the value of the AMSC Shares sold is less than the agreed upon purchase price. See Note 4, “Acquisitions and Related Goodwill” for further discussion. The Company determined the fair value of the contingent consideration based on the common stock value at September 30, 2017 to be approximately $0.4 million.

~~15.~~16. Restructuring

The Company accounts for charges resulting from operational restructuring actions in accordance with ASC Topic 420, Exit or Disposal Cost Obligations (“ASC 420”) and ASC Topic 712, Compensation—Nonretirement Postemployment Benefits (“ASC 712”). In accounting for these obligations, the Company is required to make assumptions related to the amounts of employee severance, benefits, and related costs and the time period over which leased facilities will remain vacant, sublease terms, sublease rates and discount rates. Estimates and assumptions are based on the best information available at the time the obligation arises. These estimates are reviewed and revised as facts and circumstances dictate; changes in these estimates could have a material effect on the amount accrued on the consolidated balance sheet.

The $0.4 million charged to operations in the six months ended September 30, 2018 is related to exit costs incurred for the move of the Company's corporate office.

On April 3, 2017, the Board of Directors approved a plan to reduce the Company’s global workforce by approximately 8%, effective April 4, 2017. The purpose of the workforce reduction was to reduce operating expenses to better align with the Company’s current revenues. Included in the $1.3 million severance pay, charged to operations in the six months ended September 30, 2017, is $0.5 million of severance pay for one of the Company's former executive officers pursuant to the terms of a severance agreement dated June 30, 2017. Under the terms of the severance agreement, the Company's former executive officer is entitled to 18 months of his base salary, which is expected to be paid by December 31, 2018. From and after January 1, 2018, the Company, at its discretion, may settle any remaining unpaid cash severance owed to its former executive officer through the issuance of a number of immediately vested shares of the Company’s common stock, determined by multiplying the remaining unpaid cash severance owed by 120%, and then dividing by the closing stock price per share of the Company's common stock as of the last business day prior to the issuance of the shares.

All amounts related to these restructuring activities are expected to be paid by December 31, 2018.

The following table presents restructuring charges and cash payments for the six months ended September 30, ~~2017 (in~~2018 and 2017(in thousands):


	Severance pay			Severance pay			Facility exit and
	and benefits			and benefits			Relocation costs			Total
Accrued restructuring balance at April 1, 2017	$	—
Accrued restructuring balance at April 1, 2018				$	262		$	173		$	435
Charges to operations	1,328			—			403			403
Cash payments	(746		)	(173		)	(576		)	(749		)
Accrued restructuring balance at September 30, 2017	$	582
Accrued restructuring balance at September 30, 2018				$	89		$	—		$	89



	Severance pay			Facility exit and
	and benefits			Relocation costs		Total
Accrued restructuring balance at April 1, 2017	$	—		$	—	$	—
Charges to operations	1,328			—		1,328
Cash payments	(746		)	—		(746		)
Accrued restructuring balance at September 30, 2017	$	582		$	—	$	582

All restructuring charges discussed above are included within restructuring in the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations. The Company includes ~~$0.5 million of~~ accrued restructuring within accounts payable and accrued ~~expenses and the remaining $0.1 million long term portion is included within other liabilities in the Company's unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets.~~expenses.

~~16.~~17. Business Segments

The Company reports its financial results in two reportable business segments: Wind and Grid.

Through the Company’s Windtec Solutions, the Wind business segment enables manufacturers to field wind turbines with exceptional power output, reliability and affordability. The Company supplies advanced power electronics and control systems,

licenses its highly engineered wind turbine designs, and provides extensive customer support services to wind turbine manufacturers. The Company’s design portfolio includes a broad range of drive trains and power ratings of 2 ~~MWs~~megawatts ("MWs") and higher. The Company provides a broad range of power electronics and software-based control systems that are highly integrated and designed for optimized performance, efficiency, and grid compatibility.

Through the Company’s Gridtec Solutions, the Grid business segment enables electric utilities and renewable energy project developers to connect, transmit and distribute power with exceptional efficiency, reliability and affordability. The sales process is enabled by transmission planning services that allow it to identify power grid congestion, poor power quality and other risks, which helps the Company determine how its solutions can improve network performance. These services often lead to sales of grid interconnection solutions for wind farms and solar power plants, power quality systems, and transmission and distribution cable systems. The Company also sells ship protection products to the U.S. Navy through its Grid business segment.

The operating results for the two business segments are as follows (in thousands):


	Three months ended September 30,				Six months ended September 30,				Three months ended September 30,				Six months ended September 30,
	2017		2016		2017		2016		2018		2017		2018		2017
Revenues:
Wind	$	5,554	$	12,898	$	7,831	$	18,573	$	7,307	$	5,554	$	10,985	$	7,831
Grid	5,495		5,609		12,140		13,279		7,569		5,495		16,498		12,140
Total	$	11,049	$	18,507	$	19,971	$	31,852	$	14,876	$	11,049	$	27,483	$	19,971


	Three months ended September 30,						Six months ended September 30,						Three months ended September 30,						Six months ended September 30,
	2017			2016			2017			2016			2018			2017			2018			2017
Operating loss:
Operating profit/(loss):
Wind	$	(1,440	)	$	(1,235	)	$	(5,873	)	$	(4,264	)	$	28,515		$	(1,440	)	$	27,150		$	(5,873	)
Grid	(6,100		)	(5,262		)	(14,268		)	(10,577		)	(2,870		)	(6,100		)	(5,537		)	(14,268		)
Unallocated corporate expenses	(265		)	(653		)	(2,358		)	(1,653		)	(918		)	(265		)	(2,013		)	(2,358		)
Total	$	(7,805	)	$	(7,150	)	$	(22,499	)	$	(16,494	)	$	24,727		$	(7,805	)	$	19,600		$	(22,499	)

The accounting policies of the business segments are the same as those for the consolidated Company. The Company’s business segments have been determined in accordance with the Company’s internal management structure, which is organized based on operating activities. The Company evaluates performance based upon several factors, of which the primary financial measures are segment revenues and segment operating ~~loss.~~profit (loss). The disaggregated financial results of the segments reflect allocation of certain functional expense categories consistent with the basis and manner in which Company management internally disaggregates financial information for the purpose of assisting in making internal operating decisions. In addition, certain corporate expenses which the Company does not believe are specifically attributable or allocable to either of the two business segments have been excluded from the segment operating ~~loss.~~profit (loss).

Unallocated corporate expenses primarily consist of stock-based compensation expense of $0.8 million and $0.5 million, and ~~$0.7~~restructuring charges of $0.1 million and less than $0.1 million, included in the three months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016,~~2017, respectively. Unallocated corporate expenses primarily consist of stock-based compensation expense of $1.6 million and $1.2 million and ~~$1.7~~restructuring charges of $0.4 million ~~in the six months ended September 30, 2017~~ and ~~2016, respectively. Additionally, a restructuring charge of~~ $1.3 million, is included in the six months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively, as well as a gain for the change in fair value of the contingent consideration of $0.2 million in each of the three and six months ended September 30, 2017.

Total assets for the two business segments as of September 30, ~~2017~~2018 and March 31, ~~2017~~2018 are as follows (in thousands):

September 30,
2017 March 31,
2017
Wind $ 17,328
$ 18,346
Grid 30,052
31,060
Corporate assets 53,168
50,838
Total $ 100,548
$ 100,244

~~The following table sets forth customers who represented 10% or more of the Company’s total revenues for the three and six months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016:~~

Three months ended September 30, Six months ended September 30,
2017 2016 2017 2016
INOX Wind Limited 46 % 68 % 35 % 51 %
U.S. Navy — % — % 16 % — %
YMC Inc. 15 % — % <10%
— %



	September 30, 2018		March 31, 2018
Wind	$	12,278	$	16,790
Grid	35,077		37,012
Corporate assets	58,150		34,373
Total	$	105,505	$	88,175

~~17.~~18. Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) and the International Accounting Standards Board ("IASB") issued, ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606). The guidance substantially converges final standards on revenue recognition between the FASB and IASB providing a framework on addressing revenue recognition issues and, upon its effective date, replaces almost all existing revenue recognition guidance, including industry-specific guidance, in current U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The FASB has subsequently issued ~~the following~~multiple amendments to ASU 2014-09 which are all effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017.

I~~n March 2016,~~As of April 1, 2018, the ~~FASB issued ASU No. 2016-08,~~ ~~Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent Considerations, which clarifies the implementation guidance on principal versus agent considerations.~~

~~In April 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-10,~~ ~~Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing, which clarifies certain aspects of identifying performance obligations and licensing implementation guidance.~~

~~In May 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-12,~~ ~~Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Narrow- Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients~~ related to disclosures of remaining performance obligations, as well as other amendments to guidance on collectability, non-cash consideration and the presentation of sales and other similar taxes collected from customers.

~~In December 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-20,~~ ~~Technical Corrections and Improvements to Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers~~, which amends certain narrow aspects of the guidance issued in ASU 2014-09 including guidance related to the disclosure of remaining performance obligations and prior-period performance obligations, as well as other amendments to the guidance on loan guarantee fees, contract costs, refund liabilities, advertising costs and the clarification of certain examples.

~~The~~ Company ~~is currently evaluating the provisions of~~has adopted ASU 2014-09 and its amendments, ~~and assessing~~reported the impact in its consolidated financial statements, and implemented changes to its business processes, systems and controls to support revenue recognition and the ~~adoption~~related disclosures under this ASU. The Company’s assessment included a detailed review of ~~this~~representative contracts from each of the Company’s revenue streams and a comparison of its historical accounting policies and practices to the new standard. The Company adopted the new standards retrospectively with the cumulative effect of initially applying the guidance recognized at the date of initial application (the modified retrospective transition method) to all existing contracts that have remaining obligations as of April 1, 2018. Accordingly, the Company has elected to retroactively adjust only those contracts that do not meet the definition of a complete contract at the date of the initial application. This guidance will have on its financial position, results of operations and disclosures. This process has included analyzing the current contract portfolio, comparing the Company's current contract policies and accounting to the requirements of the new standard and identifying the differences. The Company anticipates the adoption of this guidance will result in certain changes in the identification of deliverables in its contracts and allocation of transaction price. The timing of revenue recognition could also be different than under the current guidance. These multiple element contracts are primarily entered into under the grid business unit. Additionally, this guidance could lead to recognizing certain revenue transactions sooner than in the past on certain contracts, as the Company will need to estimate the revenue it will be entitled to upon contract completion, and later on other contracts, such as Consulting and Statement of Work transactions, due to the lack of an enforceable right to payment for performance obligations satisfied over time. ~~The Company will continue to assess~~There are no changes in the accounting for its ~~contracts for any~~largest revenue stream which includes Inox Wind as its primary customer. Across other ~~impacts that may result. During~~revenue streams such as D-VAR® Equipment and D-VAR® Turnkey, the ~~second half~~timing of ~~fiscal 2017 the Company plans to assess its current~~ revenue ~~controls, and identify and implement any changes that may be necessary to comply with its new revenue policies and the provisions of ASU 2014-09, which~~recognition will be affected for multiple types of contracts, primarily multiple performance obligation contracts in ~~place as of April 1, 2018.~~

The Company is required to adopt the new standards in the first quarter of fiscal 2018 and expects to do so retrospectively with the cumulative effect of initially applying the guidance recognized at the date of initial application (the modified retrospective transition method). The Company is still evaluating the finalits Grid business unit, but those differences did not have a material impact ~~of this adoption method~~ on its consolidated financial statements. The adjustment to opening accumulated deficit was not significant in the period commencing on April 1, 2018. Additionally, the adoption of this new standard is not expected to have any tax impact on the consolidated financial statements. As part of this analysis, the Company evaluated its information technology capabilities and systems, and did not incur significant information technology costs to modify systems currently in place.

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, Financial Instruments-Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities. The amendments in ASU 2016-01 will enhance the reporting model for financial instruments to provide users of financial statements with more decision-useful information. This ASU is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company ~~is currently evaluating the impact, if any, the adoption of~~adopted ASU 2016-01 ~~may have on~~effective April 1, 2018 and noted no significant impact to its consolidated financial statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842). The guidance in this ASU supersedes the leasing guidance in Topic 840, Leases. Under the new guidance, lessees are required to recognize lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet for all leases with terms longer than 12 months. Leases will be classified as either finance or operating, with classification affecting the pattern of expense recognition in the income statement. This ASU isand its amendments are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, ~~2019,~~2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. A

In July 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-10, Codification improvements to Topic 842, Leases. The amendments in ASU 2018-10 provide more clarification in regards to the application and requirements of ASU 2016-02.

In July 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-11, Topic 842, Leases - Targeted improvements. The amendments in ASU 2018-11 provide for the option to adopt the standard prospectively and recognize a cumulative-effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings as well as offer a new practical expedient that will allow the Company to elect, by class of underlying asset, to not separate non-lease and lease components in certain circumstances and instead to account for those components as a single item.

The Company is currently evaluating the provisions of ASU 2016-02 and its amendments, and assessing the impact the adoption of this guidance will have on its financial position, results of operations and disclosures. This process has included identifying the implementation team, applying the revised definition of a lease per ASC 842 to existing agreements, and from that information, creating a preliminary population. This population includes agreements identified from the following sources: existing leases under ASC 840, general ledger activity from recurring vendors and information reported from a survey provided to key individuals within the Company. The Company intends to make the policy election to exclude all leases shorter than 12 months from the recognition of the recording of the right of use ("ROU") asset and related liabilities. The Company expects to elect the package of three practical expedients in regards to all leases that commenced before the effective date as well as the practical expedient that allows the use of hindsight in determining lease term. The Company anticipates the adoption of this guidance will result in certain changes to its financial statements to add the related asset and liability accounts for all of its operating leases. The Company will continue to assess its agreements for any other impacts that may result from the adoption of this standard. During the second half of fiscal 2018, the Company plans to finalize its population of leases including the classification of type of lease

for each of those agreements and assess its current controls, as well as identify and implement any changes that may be necessary to comply with the provisions of ASU 2016-02, which will be effective on April 1, 2019.

The Company is required to adopt the new standards in the first quarter of fiscal 2019 and expects to do so using the modified retrospective transition ~~approach is required for lessees for capital and operating~~method, which will impact all leases existing at, or entered into after the ~~beginning~~period of adoption. For all leases existing at the ~~earliest comparative period presented in~~time of adoption the ~~financial statements, with certain practical expedients available.~~Company will recognize a cumulative effect adjustment to its opening balance of retained earnings as of April 1, 2019. The Company is ~~currently~~still evaluating the ~~effects adoption~~final impact of this ~~guidance will have~~adoption method on its consolidated financial statements.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments. The amendments in ASU 2016-13 will provide more ~~decision useful~~decision-useful information about the expected credit losses on financial instruments and other commitments to extend credit held by a reporting entity at each reporting date. The ASU is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within that year. The Company is currently evaluating the impact, if any, the adoption of ASU 2016-13 may have on its consolidated financial statements.

In 2016, the FASB issued the following two ASU's on Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230). Both amendments are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within that year.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments. The amendments in ASU 2016-15 ~~will~~ provide more guidance towards the classification of multiple different types of cash flows in order to reduce the diversity in reporting across entities.

In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash. The amendments in ASU 2016-18 ~~will~~ explain the change during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. Therefore, amounts generally described as restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents should be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts shown on the statement of cash flows.

The Company ~~is currently evaluating the impact, if any, the adoption of~~adopted ASU 2016-15 and ASU 2016-18 ~~may have on~~effective April 1, 2018 and noted no significant impact to its consolidated financial statements.

In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-16, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory. The amendments in ASU 2016-16 will improve the accounting for the income tax consequences of intra-entity transfers of assets other than inventory. The ASU is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within that year. The Company ~~is currently evaluating the impact, if any, the adoption of~~adopted ASU 2016-16 ~~may have on~~effective April 1, 2018 and noted no significant impact to its consolidated financial statements.

~~In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-01,~~ ~~Business Combinations~~. The amendments in ASU 2017-01 will clarify the definition of a business with the objective of adding guidance to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. The ASU is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those periods. The Company adopted ASU 2017-01 effective September 30, 2017, following the Acquisition of ITC. The Company considered these amendments in its decision to record the combination of the entities as an acquisition of a business. See Note 4, "Acquisition and Related Goodwill", for further details. These impacts have been included in the consolidated financial statements.

~~In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-03,~~ ~~Accounting Changes and Error Corrections (Topic 250) and Investments - Equity Method and Joint Ventures. The amendments in ASU 2017-03 provide additional detail surrounding disclosures required~~

related to adoption of new pronouncements. The ASU is effective for the periods of each related pronouncement. The Company is currently evaluating the impact the adoption of ASU 2017-03 may have on its consolidated financial statements.

~~In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04,~~ ~~Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment.~~ The amendments in ASU 2017-04 eliminated the prior requirement to perform procedures to determine the fair value at the impairment testing date of an entity's assets and liabilities (including unrecognized assets and liabilities) following the procedure that would be required in determining the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination. Under the new guidelines an entity should perform its annual, or interim, goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount. An entity should recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value. The ASU is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted for interim or annual goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017. Following the Acquisition of ITC, the Company performed an analysis and determined that the transaction included a portion of goodwill. The Company has accounted for that value on its balance sheet as of September 30, 2017. See Note 4, "Acquisition and Related Goodwill" for further details. The Company adopted ASU 2017-04 effective September 30, 2017, and determined there were no triggering events requiring further impairment analysis at this time. The Company expects to perform its annual impairment test during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017.

In February 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-05, Other Income - Gains and Losses from the Derecognition of Non-financial Assets (Subtopic 610-20). The amendments in ASU 2017-05 clarify the scope of Subtopic 610-20, Other Income-Gains and Losses from the Derecognition of Non-financial Assets, and to add guidance for partial sales of non-financial assets. Subtopic 610-20, which was issued in May 2014 as a part of ~~Accounting Standards Update~~ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), provides guidance for recognizing gains and losses from the transfer of non-financial assets in contracts with non-customers. The Company ~~is currently evaluating the impact the adoption of~~adopted ASU 2017-05 ~~may have~~effective April 1, 2018 and adjusted the opening balance of accumulated deficit for $0.1 million for recognition of the deferred gain on ~~its consolidated financial statements.~~the sale of the 64 Jackson Road building that occurred on March 28, 2018.

In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-09, Compensation - Stock Compensation (Subtopic 718) Scope of Modification Accounting. The amendments in ASU 2017-09 provide clarity and reduce both (1) diversity in practice and (2) cost and complexity when applying the guidance in Topic 718, Compensation—Stock Compensation, to a change to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award. The ASU is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those periods. The Company ~~is currently evaluating the impact the adoption of~~adopted ASU 2017-09 ~~may have on~~effective April 1, 2018 and noted no significant impact to its consolidated financial statements.

In July 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-11, Earnings per Share (Topic 260), Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity (Topic 480), and Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815). The amendments in ASU 2017-11 provide guidance for freestanding equity-linked financial instruments, such as warrants and conversion options in convertible debt or preferred stock, and should no longer be accounted for as a derivative liability at fair value as a result of the existence of a down round feature. The ASU is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those periods. The Company

is currently evaluating the impact the adoption of ASU 2017-11 and does not expect a significant impact on its consolidated financial statements, primarily due to the put option feature which requires continued liability classification under ASC 480.

In August 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-12, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities. The amendments in ASU 2017-12 provide improved financial reporting of hedging relationships to better portray the economic results of an entity’s risk management activities in its financial statements. In addition, the amendments in this update make certain targeted improvements to simplify the application of the hedge accounting guidance. The ASU is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those periods. The Company is currently evaluating the impact the adoption of ASU 2017-12 may have on its consolidated financial statements.

In June 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-07, Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Non-Employee Share Based Payment Accounting. The amendments in ASU 2018-07 provide for the simplification of the measurement of share-based payment transactions for acquiring goods and services from non-employees. The ASU is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those periods. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of ASU 2018-07 and does not expect it to have a significant impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-13, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement. The amendments in ASU 2018-13 provide for increased effectiveness of the disclosures made around fair value measurements while including consideration for costs and benefits. The ASU is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those periods. The Company is currently evaluating the impact the adoption of ASU 2018-13 may have on its consolidated financial statements.

~~18.~~19. Subsequent Events

The Company has performed an evaluation of subsequent events through the time of filing this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q with the SEC and has determined that there are no such events to report.

AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORPORATION

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS


ITEM 2.	MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). For this purpose, any statements contained herein that relate to future events or conditions, including without limitation, the statements in Part II, “Item 1A. Risk Factors” and in Part I under “Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and located elsewhere herein regarding industry prospects, or our prospective results of operations or financial position, adoption of accounting changes and anticipated payments from Sinovel may be deemed to be forward-looking statements. Without limiting the foregoing, the words “believes,” “anticipates,” “plans,” “expects,” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements represent management’s current expectations and are inherently uncertain. There are a number of important factors that could materially impact the value of our common stock or cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated by such forward-looking statements. These important factors include, but are not limited to: Sinovel may not make the Second Payment (as defined herein) in the timeframe expected, or at all, and the guarantor may also fail to make the Second Payment; The relevant Chinese courts and the Beijing Arbitration Commission may not accept any re-filing by us of any proceeding with Sinovel; A significant portion of our revenues are derived from a single customer, Inox, and we cannot predict if and how successful Inox will be in executing on Solar Energy Corporation of India ("SECI") orders under the new central and state auction regime, and any related failure by Inox to succeed under this regime, or any delay in Inox’s ability to deliver its wind turbines, could result in fewer ECS shipments to Inox; We have a history of operating losses and negative operating cash flows, which may continue in the future and require us to secure additional financing in the future; Our operating results may fluctuate significantly from quarter to quarter and may fall below expectations in any particular fiscal quarter; Our financial condition may have an adverse effect on our customer and supplier relationships; Lower prices for other fuel sources may reduce the demand for wind energy development, which could have a material adverse effect on our ability to grow our Wind business. Our success in addressing the wind energy market is dependent on the manufacturers that license our designs; Our success is dependent upon attracting and retaining qualified personnel and our inability to do so could significantly damage our business and prospects; We rely upon third-party suppliers for the components and sub-assemblies of many of our Wind and Grid products, making us vulnerable to supply shortages and price ~~fluctuations;~~fluctuations, which could harm our business; Failure to successfully execute ~~any~~the move of our former Devens, Massachusetts manufacturing facility or achieve expected savings following ~~any~~the move could adversely impact our financial performance; We may not realize all of the sales expected from our backlog of orders and contracts; Our success depends upon the commercial use of high temperature superconductor products, which is currently limited, and a widespread commercial market for our products may not develop; Growth of the wind energy market depends largely on the availability and size of government subsidies, economic incentives and legislative programs designed to support the growth of wind energy; Our contracts with the U.S. government are subject to audit, modification or termination by the U.S. government and include certain other provisions in favor of the government, and additional funding of such contracts may not be approved by the U.S. Congress; Tax reform in the U.S. may negatively affect our operating results; We have operations in and depend on sales in emerging markets, including India, and global conditions could negatively affect our operating results or limit our ability to expand our operations outside of these markets; Our business and operations would be adversely impacted in the event of a failure or security breach of our information technology infrastructure; If we fail to maintain proper and effective internal control over financial reporting, our ability to produce accurate and timely financial statements could be impaired and may lead investors and other users to lose confidence in our financial data; We face risks related to our intellectual property; We face risks related to our legal proceedings; We face risks relating to our settlement with Sinovel; and the important factors discussed under the caption "Risk Factors" in Part 1. Item 1A of our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, ~~2017,~~2018, Part II. Item 1A of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and our other reports filed with the SEC. These and the important factors discussed under the caption “Risk Factors” in Part 1. Item 1A of our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, ~~2017~~2018 and under Part II. Item IA of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q among others, could cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated by forward-looking statements made herein and presented elsewhere by management from time to time. Any such forward-looking statements represent management’s estimates as of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. While we may elect to update such forward-looking statements at some point in the future, we disclaim any obligation to do so, even if subsequent events cause our views to change. These forward-looking statements should not be relied upon as representing our views as of any date subsequent to the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

American Superconductor®, Amperium®, AMSC®, D-VAR®, PowerModule™, D-VAR® VVO, PQ-IVR®, SeaTitan™, Gridtec Solutions™, Windtec Solutions™ and Smarter, Cleaner...Better Energy™ are trademarks or registered trademarks of American Superconductor Corporation or our subsidiaries. We reserve all of our rights with respect to our trademarks or registered

trademarks regardless of whether they are so designated in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q by an ® or ™ symbol. All other brand names, product names, trademarks or service marks appearing in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are the property of their respective holders.

Executive Overview

We are a leading provider of megawatt-scale solutions that lower the cost of wind power and enhance the performance of the power grid. In the wind power market, we enable manufacturers to field highly competitive wind turbines through our advanced power electronics products, engineering, and support services. In the power grid market, we enable electric utilities and renewable

energy project developers to connect, transmit and distribute power through our transmission planning services and power electronics and superconductor-based products. Our wind and power grid products and services provide exceptional reliability, security, efficiency and affordability to our customers.

Our wind and power grid solutions help to improve energy efficiency, alleviate power grid capacity constraints and increase the adoption of renewable energy generation. Demand for our solutions is driven by the growing needs for renewable sources of electricity, such as wind and solar energy, and for modernized smart grids that improve power reliability, security and quality. Concerns about these factors have led to increased spending by corporations as well as supportive government regulations and initiatives on local, state, national and global levels, including renewable portfolio standards, tax incentives and international treaties.

We manufacture products using two proprietary core technologies: PowerModule™ programmable power electronic converters and our Amperium® high temperature superconductor (“HTS”) wires. These technologies and our system-level solutions are protected by a broad and deep intellectual property portfolio consisting of hundreds of patents and licenses worldwide.

We operate our business under two market-facing business units: Wind and Grid. We believe this market-centric structure enables us to more effectively anticipate and meet the needs of wind turbine manufacturers, power generation project developers and electric utilities.

Wind. Through our Windtec Solutions™, our Wind business segment enables manufacturers to field wind turbines with exceptional power output, reliability and affordability. We supply advanced power electronics and control systems, license our highly engineered wind turbine designs, and provide extensive customer support services to wind turbine manufacturers. Our design portfolio includes a broad range of drive trains and power ratings of 2 megawatts (“MW”) and higher. We provide a broad range of power electronics and software-based control systems that are highly integrated and designed for optimized performance, efficiency, and grid compatibility.

Grid. Through our Gridtec Solutions™, our Grid business segment enables electric utilities and renewable energy project developers to connect, transmit and distribute power with exceptional efficiency, reliability, security and affordability. We provide transmission planning services that allow us to identify power grid congestion, poor power quality, and other risks, which help us determine how our solutions can improve network performance. These services often lead to sales of our grid interconnection solutions for wind farms and solar power plants, power quality systems and transmission and distribution cable systems. We also sell ship protection products to the U.S. Navy through our Grid business segment.

Our fiscal year begins on April 1 and ends on March 31. When we refer to a particular fiscal year, we are referring to the fiscal year beginning on April 1 of that same year. For example, fiscal ~~2017~~2018 refers to the fiscal year beginning on April 1, ~~2017.~~2018. Other fiscal years follow similarly.

On ~~September 25, 2017,~~July 3, 2018, we ~~acquired Infinia Technology Corporation~~and our wholly-owned subsidiaries Suzhou AMSC Superconductor Co. Ltd. (“~~ITC”~~AMSC China”) ~~for approximately $3.8 million as described below (the “Acquisition”~~and AMSC Austria GMBH (“AMSC Austria”)~~. Located in Richmond, Washington, ITC is~~ entered into a ~~technology firm founded in 2009 specializing in the design, development and commercialization of cryo-coolers for a wide range of applications.~~

~~Pursuant to a stock purchase~~settlement agreement (the ~~“SPA”~~“Settlement Agreement”) with Sinovel Wind Group Co., ~~we acquired all~~Ltd. (“Sinovel”). The Settlement Agreement settles the litigation and arbitration proceedings between us and Sinovel listed on Schedule 2 of the ~~issued~~Settlement Agreement (the “Proceedings”), and ~~outstanding shares~~any other civil claims, counterclaims, causes of ~~ITC~~action, rights and obligations directly or indirectly relating to the subject matters of the Proceedings and the contracts between us and Sinovel listed on Schedules 1 and 4 of the Settlement Agreement (the ~~“ITC Shares”~~“Contracts”) ~~for a purchase price~~, subject to the exception described in Section 1.1 of ~~approximately $3.8 million, consisting of $0.1 million in cash~~the Settlement Agreement. The Settlement Agreement was filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed with the Securities and ~~884,890 shares of our common stock, par value $0.01 per share (the “AMSC Shares”).~~Exchange Commission on July 9, 2018. Under the terms of the ~~SPA, we were obligated~~Settlement Agreement, Sinovel agreed to ~~file a registration statement (the “Resale Registration Statement”~~pay AMSC China an aggregate cash amount in Renminbi ("RMB") ~~covering~~equivalent to $57.5 million, consisting of two installments. Sinovel paid the ~~resale~~first installment of ~~the AMSC Shares by certain selling stockholders (the “Selling Stockholders”) no later than 10 business days following the closing of the Acquisition,~~$32.5 million on July 4, 2018, and to use commercially reasonable efforts to cause the Resale Registration Statement to be declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) as soon as practicable thereafter. Additionally, wehas agreed to pay the ~~Selling Stockholders an amount~~second installment of $25.0 million (the “Second Payment”) within ten (10) months after the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin (the “District Court”) delivers

the first sentence against Sinovel in ~~cash~~the criminal case entitled United States v. Sinovel Wind Co., Ltd., Case Number 3:13-cr-00084-jdp. On July 6, 2018, the District Court delivered such sentence, and therefore the Second Payment is due by May 6, 2019 (the ~~“Make Whole Payment”~~"Second Payment Due Date")~~, if any, equal~~. Mr. Wenyuan Wei, former Sinovel chairman and a current Sinovel shareholder, has delivered a letter of guarantee to ~~(x) an amount equal~~us for the Second Payment should Sinovel fail to ~~(i)~~make such payment by the ~~price per AMSC Share~~Second Payment Due Date.

In addition, pursuant to the terms of the ~~SPA, multiplied by (ii) the number~~Settlement Agreement, we and AMSC Austria have granted Sinovel a non-exclusive license for certain of ~~AMSC Shares sold by Selling Stockholders during the first 90 days after the effectiveness~~our intellectual property to be used solely in Sinovel’s doubly fed wind turbines (the “License”). We have agreed not to sue Sinovel, Sinovel’s power converter suppliers or Sinovel’s customers for use of the ~~Resale Registration Statement, minus (y) the aggregate sales proceeds received~~technology covered by the ~~Selling Stockholders from~~License. In the ~~sale of any AMSC Shares during~~event that Sinovel or Mr. Wei does not make the ~~first 90 days after~~Second Payment by the ~~effectiveness~~Second Payment Due Date, the Settlement Agreement provides that the License will terminate. See Note 15 “Commitments and Contingencies” for additional information on the terms of the ~~Resale Registration Statement. The Resale Registration Statement was declared effective on October 23, 2017. We have granted a security interest in~~Settlement Agreement.

On July 25, 2018, we received notice from BASF Corporation (“BASF”) that BASF will not be extending the ~~ITC Shares to the Selling Stockholders to secure our obligation to make any Make Whole Payment.~~

~~We valued the Acquisition at $4.2 million (excluding Acquisition costs), using a value of $4.02 per share, which represents the closing price of our common stock on the closing date~~term of the ~~Acquisition plus $0.1 million in cash~~Joint Development Agreement dated March 4, 2016 (“JDA”) by and ~~$0.6 million contingent~~

~~consideration for the Make Whole Payment valued as of the closing date.~~between BASF and us beyond March 3, 2019. As a result, ~~of this transaction, ITC became a wholly-owned subsidiary and was integrated into our Grid business unit.~~

~~The results of ITC's operations are included~~BASF will not be required to pay $1.0 million in our consolidated results and our Grid segment reporting from the date of acquisition, September 25, 2017. Assuming the Acquisition had occurred on April 1, 2017 and 2016, the impact on our consolidated results2019 to us as otherwise would ~~not~~ have been ~~significant.~~required pursuant to the terms of the JDA. To date, BASF has paid $6.0 million to us under the JDA.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The preparation of the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements requires that we make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. We base our estimates on historical experience and various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ under different assumptions or conditions. During the six months ended September 30, ~~2017,~~2018, we adopted ASU ~~2017-04,~~2014-09, which provides for ~~changes~~new requirements in regards to ~~the annual impairment testing of goodwill.~~revenue recognition. See Note ~~4, "Acquisition and Related Goodwill"~~2, "Revenue Recognition" for further details. Aside from the adoption of ASU ~~2017-04,~~2014-09, there were no significant changes in the critical accounting policies that were disclosed in our Form 10-K for fiscal ~~2016,~~2017, which ended on March 31, ~~2017.~~2018.

Results of Operations

Three and six months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 compared to the three and six months ended September 30, ~~2016~~2017

Revenues

Total revenues ~~decreased 40%~~increased 35% and ~~37%~~38% to $14.9 million and $27.5 million for the three and six months ended September 30, 2018, compared to $11.0 million and $20.0 million for the three and six months ended September 30, ~~2017, respectively, compared to $18.5 million and $31.9 million for the three and six months ended September 30, 2016, respectively.~~2017. Our revenues are summarized as follows (in thousands):


	Three months ended September 30,				Six months ended September 30,				Three months ended September 30,				Six months ended September 30,
	2017		2016		2017		2016		2018		2017		2018		2017
Revenues:
Wind	$	5,554	$	12,898	$	7,831	$	18,573	$	7,307	$	5,554	$	10,985	$	7,831
Grid	5,495		5,609		12,140		13,279		7,569		5,495		16,498		12,140
Total	$	11,049	$	18,507	$	19,971	$	31,852	$	14,876	$	11,049	$	27,483	$	19,971

Our Wind business unit accounted for ~~50%~~49% and ~~39%~~40% of total revenues for the three and six months ended September 30, ~~2017, respectively,~~2018, compared to ~~70%~~50% and ~~58%~~39% for the three and six months ended September 30, ~~2016, respectively.~~2017. Revenues in the Wind business unit ~~decreased 57%~~increased 32% and ~~58%~~40% to $7.3 million and $11.0 million in the three and six months ended September 30, 2018, from $5.6 million and $7.8 million in the three and six months ended September 30, ~~2017, respectively, from $12.9 million and $18.6 million in the three and six months ended September 30, 2016, respectively.~~2017. Wind business unit revenues increased due to increased ECS shipments to Inox during the 2018 periods. Inox has been active in the ~~three~~new central and ~~six months ended September 30, 2017 decreased due primarily~~state government auction regime in India and has over 900 MW of orders from the first four SECI central government auctions, and 50 MW from the Maharashtra state government auction. However, we cannot predict if and how successful Inox will be in executing on these orders or in obtaining new orders under the new central and state auction regime. Any failure by Inox to succeed under this regime, or any delay in Inox’s ability to deliver its wind turbines, could result in fewer ECS shipments to Inox. This resulted from what we believe, based on our discussions with Inox, to be a temporary demand dislocation caused by the reaction in certain states in India to a recent national wind energy auction that resulted in a record-low power purchase tariff.

Our Grid business unit accounted for ~~50%~~51% and ~~61%~~60% of total revenues for the three and six months ended September 30, ~~2017, respectively,~~2018, compared to ~~30%~~50% and ~~42%~~61% for the three and six months ended September 30, ~~2016, respectively.~~2017. Our Grid business unit revenues ~~decreased 2%~~

increased 38% and 36% to $7.6 million and $16.5 million in the three and six months ended September 30, 2018, from $5.5 million and ~~decreased 9% to~~ $12.1 million in the three and six months ended September 30, ~~2017, respectively, from $5.6 million and $13.3 million in the three and six months ended September 30, 2016, respectively.~~2017. Grid business unit revenues ~~in the three and six months ended September 30, 2017 decreased~~increased primarily due to ~~lower~~higher D-VAR system ~~revenues than in the prior year period, partially offset, in the six months ended September, 30, 2017, by higher revenue from the U.S. Navy.~~revenues.

The following table sets forth customers who represented 10% or more of our total revenues for the three and six months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016:~~

2017:


	Three months ended September 30,				Six months ended September 30,				Reportable	Three months ended September 30,				Six months ended September 30,
	2017		2016		2017		2016		Segment	2018		2017		2018		2017
INOX Wind Limited	46	%	68	%	35	%	51	%
Inox Wind Limited									Wind	45	%	46	%	36	%	35	%
Vestas									Grid	11	%	—	%	23	%	—	%
Quanta Power									Grid	12	%	—	%	<10%		—	%
U.S. Navy	—	%	—	%	16	%	—	%	Grid	<10%		—	%	<10%		16	%
YMC Inc.	15	%	—	%	<10%		—	%	Grid	—	%	15	%	—	%	<10%

Cost of Revenues and Gross Margin

Cost of revenues ~~decreased~~increased by ~~34% and 16%~~4% to ~~$10.8 million and $24.2~~$11.3 million for the three ~~and~~months ended September 30, 2018, compared to $10.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017. Cost of revenues decreased by 17% to $20.0 million for the six months ended September 30, ~~2017,~~2018, compared to ~~$16.4 million and $28.9~~$24.2 million for the ~~three and~~ six months ended September 30, ~~2016.~~2017. Gross margin was ~~2% and (21)%~~24% for the three ~~and~~months ended September 30, 2018, compared to 2% for the three months ended September 30, 2017. Gross margin was 27% for the six months ended September 30, ~~2017,~~2018, compared to ~~11% and 9%~~(21)% for the ~~three and~~ six months ended September 30, ~~2016.~~2017. The ~~decreases~~increases in ~~the~~ gross margin ~~for~~in both the three and six ~~months ended September 30, 2017~~month periods were due to ~~decreased revenue as discussed above, partially offset by~~increased revenues, a more favorable product mix, ~~in the current year period.~~lower depreciation and reduced fixed factory overhead.

Operating Expenses

Research and development

R&D expenses ~~increased~~decreased in the three and six months ended September 30, 2018 by 3%23% and ~~decreased by 3%~~10% to $2.3 million and $5.1 million from $3.0 million and $5.7 million for the three and six months ended September 30, ~~2017, from $2.9 million and $5.8 million for the three and six months ended September 30, 2016.~~2017. The ~~increase~~decreases in R&D expenses ~~in the three months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to the prior year period was~~were primarily due to lower research and development subsidy credits, partially offset by lower compensation expense. The decrease in R&D expenses for the six month period ended September 30, 2017 compared to the prior year period was primarily due to lowerdecreased compensation expense.

Selling, general, and administrative

SG&A expenses decreased by ~~16%~~3% and ~~15%~~4% to $5.2 million and $11.0 million in the three and six months ended September 30, 2018, from $5.3 million and $11.5 million in the three and six months ended September 30, ~~2017, from $6.3 million and $13.6 million in the three and six months ended September 30, 2016.~~2017. The ~~decreases~~decrease in SG&A expenses ~~in the three and six months ended September 30, 2017 were~~was due primarily to reduced overall compensation expense.

Gain on Sinovel settlement

We recorded a gain of $28.7 million, net of legal and other direct costs, in each of the three and six months ended September 30, 2018 as a result of the receipt of the first payment from Sinovel required by the Settlement Agreement in July 2018.

Amortization of acquisition related intangibles

We recorded amortization expense related to our core technology and know-how, trade names and trademark intangible assets of $0.1 million and $0.2 million in the three and six months ended September 30, 2018, and less than $0.1 million in each of the three and six months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2017.

Restructuring

We recorded $0.1 million and ~~2016.~~

~~Change in fair value of contingent consideration~~

~~The change in fair value of our contingent consideration~~$0.4 million for ~~the Make Whole Payment on the ITC Acquisition resulted in a gain of $0.2 million~~facility exit costs in the three and six months ended September 30, ~~2017. The change in~~2018 as a result of the ~~fair value~~move of the corporate office that was ~~primarily driven by the change in stock price, which is a key valuation metric.~~

~~Restructuring~~

announced as part of our April 4, 2017 approved restructuring plan. We recorded a restructuring charge of $1.3 million for severance costs in the six months ended September 30, 2017 as a result of the reduction in force also announced on April 4, 2017. Included in the $1.3 million severance pay charged to operations in the six months ended September 30, 2017, is $0.5 million of severance pay for one of our former executive officers pursuant to the terms of a severance agreement dated June 30, 2017. Under the terms of the severance agreement, our former executive officer is entitled

to eighteen months of his base salary, which is expected to be paid by December 31, 2018. From and after January 1, 2018, at our discretion, we may settle any remaining unpaid cash severance owed to our former executive officer through the issuance of a number of immediately vested shares of our common stock, determined by multiplying the remaining unpaid cash severance owed by 120%, and then dividing by the closing stock price per share of our common stock as of the last business day prior to the issuance of the shares.

Operating ~~loss~~profit/(loss)

Our operating ~~loss~~profit/(loss) is summarized as follows (in thousands):


	Three months ended September 30,						Six months ended September 30,						Three months ended September 30,						Six months ended September 30,
	2017			2016			2017			2016			2018			2017			2018			2017
Operating loss:
Operating profit/(loss):
Wind	$	(1,440	)	$	(1,235	)	$	(5,873	)	$	(4,264	)	$	28,515		$	(1,440	)	$	27,150		$	(5,873	)
Grid	(6,100		)	(5,262		)	(14,268		)	(10,577		)	(2,870		)	(6,100		)	(5,537		)	(14,268		)
Unallocated corporate expenses	(265		)	(653		)	(2,358		)	(1,653		)	(918		)	(265		)	(2,013		)	(2,358		)
Total	$	(7,805	)	$	(7,150	)	$	(22,499	)	$	(16,494	)	$	24,727		$	(7,805	)	$	19,600		$	(22,499	)

Our Wind segment generated an operating ~~loss~~income of $28.5 million and $27.1 million in the three and six months ended September 30, 2018, compared to losses of $1.4 million and $5.9 million in the three and six months ended September 30, ~~2017, compared~~2017. The increase in the Wind business unit operating income was due primarily to ~~$1.2~~the receipt of the first payment from Sinovel required by the Settlement Agreement in July 2018 as well as increased shipments of ECS to Inox.

Our Grid segment generated operating losses of $2.9 million and ~~$4.3~~$5.5 million in the three and six months ended September 30, ~~2016. The increases in the Wind business unit operating loss in the three and six months ended September 30, 2017 were due primarily~~2018, compared to ~~fewer ECS shipments to Inox as previously discussed.~~

~~Our Grid segment generated an operating loss~~losses of $6.1 million and $14.3 million in the three and six months ended September 30, ~~2017, compared to $5.3 million and $10.6 million in the three and six months ended September 30, 2016.~~2017. The ~~increases~~decrease in the Grid business unit operating ~~loss in the three and six months ended September 30, 2017 were~~losses was due primarily to ~~$1.6 million and $4.1 million, respectively, of accelerated~~increased D-VAR revenues, a more favorable product mix, lower depreciation ~~related to revised estimates of the useful lives of certain pieces of manufacturing equipment,~~ and lower ~~D-VAR system revenues.~~operating expenses compared to the prior year period.

Unallocated corporate expenses primarily consist of stock-based compensation expense of $0.8 million and $0.5 million, and restructuring charges of $0.1 million and less than $0.1 million, included in the three months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Unallocated corporate expenses primarily consist of stock-based compensation expense of $1.6 million and $1.2 million ~~for the three~~ and ~~six months ended September 30, 2017, respectively, and $0.7~~restructuring charges of $0.4 million and ~~$1.7 million in the three and six months ended September 30, 2016, respectively. Additionally, a restructuring charge of~~ $1.3 million ~~primarily for severance costs as a result of the restructuring action announced on April 4, 2017, is~~ included in ~~unallocated corporate expenses for~~ the six months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively, as well as a gain for the change in fair value of ~~the~~ contingent consideration of $0.2 million in each of the three and six months ended September 30, 2017.

Change in fair value of warrants

The change in fair value of warrants resulted in ~~gains~~a gain of $0.3 million and loss of $0.2 million in the three and six months ended September 30, 2018, compared to a gain of $0.1 million and $1.1 million in the three and six months ended September 30, ~~2017, compared to gains of $1.2 million and $0.6 million in the three and six months ended September 30, 2016.~~2017. The change in the fair value was primarily driven by changes in stock price, which is a key valuation metric.

Interest income, ~~(expense),~~ net

Interest income, ~~(expense),~~ net, was ~~income of less than $0.1 million in each of the three and six months ended September 30, 2017, compared to expense of $0.1~~$0.2 million and ~~$0.2~~$0.4 million in the three and six months ended September 30, ~~2016.~~2018, compared to $0.1 million and less than $0.1 million in the three and six months ended September 30, 2017. The ~~decrease~~increase in interest income was primarily related to ~~lower~~imputed interest ~~expense due~~earned in relation to the ~~maturity~~outstanding note receivable for the sale of ~~both of our term loans with Hercules Technology Growth Capital, Inc. (“Hercules”). Our Term Loan B matured in November 2016, and our Term Loan C matured in June 2017.~~the 64 Jackson Road building.

Other ~~expense,~~income (expense), net

Other ~~expense,~~income (expense), net, was income of $0.3 million and $0.9 million in the three and six months ended September 30, 2018, compared to expense of $0.8 million and $2.2 million in the three and six months ended September 30, ~~2017, compared to~~2017. The increase in other income, net, during the three and six months ended September 30, 2018, was primarily driven by higher foreign currency gains.

Income Taxes

Income tax expense ~~net, of $0.5 million and $0.4~~was $3.0 million in the three and six months ended September 30, ~~2016. The increase in other expense, net, during the three and six months ended September 30, 2017, was primarily driven by higher foreign currency losses.~~

~~Income Taxes~~

~~Income~~2018, compared to income tax benefit ~~was~~of $0.2 million and $0.1 million in the three and six months ended September 30, ~~2017, compared to income tax expense of $0.8 million and $1.1 million in the three and six months ended September 30, 2016.~~2017. The ~~decrease~~increase in income tax expense ~~during the six months ended September 30, 2017~~ was primarily due to the ~~release~~repayment of ~~valuation allowances of $1.1 million~~previously reserved intercompany trade balances due to AMSC Austria from AMSC China, and a dividend paid by AMSC Austria to us in the three months ended September 30, ~~2017 as a result of~~2018 following the ~~deferred tax liability purchase adjustment recorded as a result of the ITC Acquisition, for the difference in tax basis on the ITC net assets acquired.~~Sinovel settlement.

Non-GAAP Measures

Generally, a non-GAAP financial measure is a numerical measure of a company’s performance, financial position or cash flow that either excludes or includes amounts that are not normally excluded or included in the most directly comparable measure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP. The non-GAAP measures included in this Form 10-Q, however, should be considered in addition to, and not as a substitute for or superior to the comparable measure prepared in accordance with GAAP.

We define non-GAAP net loss as net loss before ~~sale of minority investments,~~ stock-based compensation, gain on Sinovel settlement, amortization of acquisition-related intangibles, ~~consumption of zero cost-basis inventory,~~ changes in fair value of warrants and contingent consideration, non-cash interest expense, tax effect of adjustments, and the other non-cash or unusual charges, indicated in the table below. We believe non-GAAP net loss assists management and investors in comparing our performance across reporting periods on a consistent basis by excluding these non-cash or non-recurring charges that we do not believe are indicative of our core operating performance. A reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP net loss is set forth in the table below (in thousands, except per share data):


	Three months ended September 30,						Six months ended September 30,						Three months ended September 30,						Six months ended September 30,
	2017			2016			2017			2016			2018			2017			2018			2017
Net loss	$	(7,281	)	$	(7,325	)	$	(22,533	)	$	(17,680	)
Net income (loss)													$	22,558		$	(7,281	)	$	17,821		$	(22,533	)
Sale of minority investments	(951		)	—			(951		)	—			—			(951		)	—			(951		)
Stock-based compensation	478			653			1,232			1,653			825			478			1,610			1,232
(Gain) on Sinovel settlement, net													(28,720		)	—			(28,720		)	—
Amortization of acquisition-related intangibles	—			39			13			78			85			—			170			13
Consumption of zero cost-basis inventory	(340		)	(482		)	(396		)	(640		)
Change in fair value of warrants and contingent consideration	(346		)	(1,244		)	(1,270		)	(567		)	(282		)	(346		)	182			(1,270		)
Non-cash interest expense	—			42			19			98			—			—			—			19
Tax effect of adjustments	114			77			123			102			2,829			114			2,829			123
Non-GAAP net loss	$	(8,326	)	$	(8,240	)	$	(23,763	)	$	(16,956	)	$	(2,705	)	$	(7,986	)	$	(6,108	)	$	(23,367	)

Non-GAAP net loss per share	$	(0.44	)	$	(0.60	)	$	(1.33	)	$	(1.24	)
Weighted average shares outstanding - basic and diluted	19,060			13,769			17,925			13,723
Non-GAAP net loss per share - basic													$	(0.13	)	$	(0.42	)	$	(0.30	)	$	(1.30	)
Non-GAAP net loss per share - diluted													$	(0.13	)	$	(0.42	)	$	(0.30	)	$	(1.30	)
Weighted average shares outstanding - basic													20,313			19,060			20,240			17,925
Weighted average shares outstanding - diluted													20,313			19,060			20,240			17,925

We incurred non-GAAP net losses of ~~$8.3~~$2.7 million and $6.1 million or ~~$0.44 per share,~~$0.13 and ~~$23.8 million or $1.33~~$0.30 per share, for the three and six months ended September 30, ~~2017,~~2018, compared to non-GAAP net losses of ~~$8.2~~$8.0 million and $23.4 million or ~~$0.60 per share,~~$0.42 and ~~$17.0 million or $1.24~~$1.30 per share for the three and six months ended September 30, ~~2016.~~2017. The ~~increase~~decrease in non-GAAP net loss ~~in both the three and six month period ended September 30, 2017~~ was driven primarily by an increase in net ~~loss~~income driven by higher revenues.

We define non-GAAP operating cash flow as ~~previously discussed,~~operating cash flow before: the gain on Sinovel settlement (net of legal fees and ~~an adjustment for the sale~~expenses); tax effect of adjustments; and other unusual cash flows or items. We believe non-GAAP operating cash flow assists management and investors in comparing our operating cash flow across reporting periods on a consistent basis by excluding these non-recurring cash items that it does not believe are indicative of our ~~minority investment in Blade Dynamics, partially offset by the gain resulting from the decreased value~~core operating cash flow. A reconciliation of ~~the warrants and contingent consideration on the ITC acquisition~~GAAP to non-GAAP operating cash flow is set forth in the ~~three months ended September 30, 2017.~~table below (in thousands, except per share data).



	Three months ending
	September 30, 2018
Operating cash flow	$30,481
Sinovel settlement (net of legal fees and expenses)	(30,336	)
Tax effect of adjustments	1,247
Non-GAAP operating cash flow	$1,392

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We have experienced recurring operating losses and as of September 30, ~~2017~~2018 had an accumulated deficit of ~~$978.1~~$970.5 million. In addition, although we generated positive operating cash flows in the six month period ended September 30, 2018, we have historically experienced recurring negative operating cash ~~flows and~~flows. Although our ~~Wind segment revenues decreased substantially~~sales to Inox increased in the six months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 compared to the prior year period. From April 1, 2011 through the date of this filing, we have reduced our global workforce substantially, including an 8% reduction in force, primarily affecting employees in our Devens, Massachusetts facility, effective April 4, 2017. We incurred restructuring charges of $1.3 million in cash severance expenses in the six months ended September 30, 2017, we cannot predict if and how successful Inox will be in ~~connection with~~executing on SECI orders or in obtaining additional orders under the ~~workforce reduction. We plan~~new central and state auction regime. Any failure by Inox to ~~closely monitor our expenses and, if required, expect~~succeed under this regime, or any delay in Inox’s ability to ~~further reduce operating costs and capital spending~~deliver its wind turbines, could result in fewer ECS shipments to ~~enhance liquidity.~~Inox.

Our cash requirements depend on numerous factors, including ifwhether Inox is successful under the new central and ~~when~~state auction regime as noted above, our ability to collect the ~~Inox demand dislocation is resolved,~~Second Payment from Sinovel, the successful completion of our product development activities, our ability to commercialize our Resilient Electric Grid (“REG”) and ship protection system solutions, the rate of customer and market adoption of our products, collecting receivables according to established terms, and the continued availability of U.S. government funding during the product development phase of our ~~Superconductors-based~~superconductor-based products. We continue to closely monitor our expenses and, if required, expect to further reduce our operating and capital spending to enhance liquidity.

AtAs of September 30, ~~2017,~~2018, we had cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash of ~~$30.5~~$56.3 million, compared to ~~$27.7~~$34.2 million atas of March 31, ~~2017,~~2018, an increase of ~~$2.7~~$22.1 million. ~~The increase in total~~As of September 30, 2018, we had approximately $5.9 million of cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash ~~was due primarily~~

~~to cash received from the May 2017 equity offering. See further discussion below.~~in foreign bank accounts. Our cash and cash equivalents, and restricted cash are summarized as follows (in thousands):


	September 30, 2017		March 31, 2017		September 30, 2018		March 31, 2018
Cash and cash equivalents	$	30,320	$	26,784	$	56,169	$	34,084
Restricted cash	165		960		165		165
Total cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash	$	30,485	$	27,744	$	56,334	$	34,249

~~As of September 30, 2017, we had approximately $3.1 million of cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash in foreign bank accounts, with a majority of this cash located in Europe.~~

For the six months ended September 30, ~~2017,~~2018, net cash ~~used in~~provided by operating activities was ~~$13.5~~$23.6 million compared to ~~$10.9~~$13.5 million of net cash used for the six months ended September 30, ~~2016.~~2017. The increase in net cash ~~used in~~provided by operations was due primarily to ~~an increased operating loss, and less cash collections~~the receipt of the first payment from ~~Inox, partially offset by usage of inventory.~~the Sinovel settlement.

For the six months ended September 30, ~~2017,~~2018, net cash used in investing activities was $0.4 million, compared to net cash provided by investing activities ~~was $1.3 million, compared to net cash used in investing activities~~ of ~~$0.4~~$0.5 million for the six months ended September 30, ~~2016.~~2017. The ~~increase~~decrease in net cash ~~used in~~provided by investing activities was due primarily to the ~~additional cash received related to~~proceeds from the ~~achievement of certain milestones following the previous~~ sale of ~~our~~ minority interest in ~~Blade Dynamics and~~ the ~~decrease~~prior year period which did not occur in ~~restricted cash.~~the current year period.

For the six months ended September 30, ~~2017,~~2018, net cash used in financing activities was $0.3 million compared to net cash provided by financing activities ~~was~~of $15.2 ~~million compared to net cash used in financing activities of $2.5~~ million in the six months ended September 30, ~~2016.~~2017. The ~~increase~~decrease in net cash provided by financing activities was primarily due to net proceeds of $17.0 million from the issuance of 4.6 million shares of common stock in May 2017, with no such equity offering in the ~~prior~~current year period. ~~See the discussion regarding the May 2017 equity offering below.~~

AtAs of September 30, ~~2017,~~2018, we had $0.2 million of restricted cash included in long-term assets. These amounts included in restricted cash primarily represent deposits to secure letters of credit for various supply contracts. These deposits are held in interest bearing accounts.

On December 19, 2014, we amended our Loan and Security Agreement (the "Term Loan") with Hercules and entered into a new term loan (the “Term Loan C”), borrowing $1.5 million (our prior $10.0 million term loan with Hercules was repaid in full at maturity on November 1, 2016). After closing fees and expenses, the net proceeds from the Term Loan C were $1.4 million. We made interest only payments on the Term Loan C until maturity on June 1, 2017, when the loan was repaid in its entirety.

On May 5, 2017, we entered into an underwriting agreement relating to the issuance and sale (the "Offering") of up to 4.0 million shares of our common stock at a public offering price of $4.00 per share and granted a 30-day option (the "Option") to the underwriters to purchase up to an additional 600,000 shares of common stock at the public offering price. The net proceeds to us from the Offering were approximately $14.7 million, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and offering expenses payable by us. On May 24, 2017, the underwriters notified us that they had exercised in full their Option to purchase an additional 600,000 shares of common stock in connection with the Offering. The net proceeds to us from the Option were approximately $2.3 million, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and offering expenses payable by us. The total net proceeds to us during the three months ended June 30, 2017 from the Offering and Option were approximately $17.0 million, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and offering expenses payable by us. The Company terminated its At Market Issuance Sales Agreement with FBR Capital Markets & Co in conjunction with the Offering. In addition, in December 2015, we entered into a set of strategic agreements valued at approximately $210.0 million with Inox.

We believe we have sufficient available liquidity to fund our operations and capital expenditures for the next twelve months. In addition, we may seek to raise additional capital, which could be in the form of loans, convertible debt or equity, to fund our operating requirements and capital expenditures. Our liquidity is highly dependent on our ability to increase revenues, including our ability to collect revenues under our agreements with Inox, control our operating costs, and our ability to raise additional capital, if necessary. There can be no assurance that we will be able to raise additional capital, on favorable terms or at all, or execute on any other means of improving our liquidity as described above.

Legal Proceedings

We are involved in legal and administrative proceedings and claims of various types. See Part II, Item 1, “Legal Proceedings,” for additional information. We record a liability in our consolidated financial statements for these matters when a loss is known

or considered probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated. We review these estimates each accounting period as additional information is known and adjust the loss provision when appropriate. If a matter is both probable to result in liability and the amounts of loss can be reasonably estimated, we estimate and disclose the possible loss or range of loss to the extent necessary to make the consolidated financial statements not misleading. If the loss is not probable or cannot be reasonably estimated, a liability is not recorded in our consolidated financial statements.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements, as defined under SEC rules, such as relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, which are often referred to as structured finance or special purpose entities, established for the purpose of facilitating transactions that are not required to be reflected on our balance sheet except as discussed below.

We occasionally enter into construction contracts that include a performance bond. As these contracts progress, we continually assess the probability of a payout from the performance bond. Should we determine that such a payout is probable, we would record a liability.

In addition, we have various contractual arrangements in which minimum quantities of goods or services have been committed to be purchased on an annual basis.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) and the International Accounting Standards Board ~~(IASB)~~("IASB") issued ~~ASU~~Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606). The guidance substantially converges final standards on revenue recognition between the FASB and IASB providing a framework on addressing revenue recognition issues and, upon its effective date, replaces almost all existing revenue recognition guidance, including industry-specific guidance, in current U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The FASB has subsequently issued the following multiple amendments to ASU 2014-09 which are all effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017.

•~~In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-08,~~ ~~Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent Considerations, which clarifies the implementation guidance on principal versus agent considerations.~~

•InAs of April ~~2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-10,~~ ~~Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing, which clarifies certain aspects of identifying performance obligations and licensing implementation guidance.~~

•~~In May 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-12,~~ ~~Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Narrow- Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients~~ related to disclosures of remaining performance obligations, as well as other amendments to guidance on collectability, non-cash consideration and the presentation of sales and other similar taxes collected from customers.

•~~In December 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-20,~~ ~~Technical Corrections and Improvements to Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers~~, which amends certain narrow aspects of the guidance issued in ASU 2014-09 including guidance related to the disclosure of remaining performance obligations and prior-period performance obligations, as well as other amendments to the guidance on loan guarantee fees, contract costs, refund liabilities, advertising costs and the clarification of certain examples.

~~We are currently evaluating the provisions of~~1, 2018, we have adopted ASU 2014-09 and its amendments, ~~and assessing~~reported the impact in our consolidated financial statements, and implemented changes to our business processes, systems and controls to support revenue recognition and the ~~adoption~~related disclosures under this ASU. Our assessment included a detailed review of ~~this~~representative contracts from each of our revenue streams and a comparison of our historical accounting policies and practices to the new standard. We adopted the new standards retrospectively with the cumulative effect of initially applying the guidance recognized at the date of initial application (the modified retrospective transition method) to all existing contracts that have remaining obligations as of April 1, 2018. Accordingly, we have elected to retroactively adjust only those contracts that do not meet the definition of a complete contract at the date of the initial application. This guidance will have on our financial position, results of operations and disclosures. This process has included analyzing the current contract portfolio, comparing our current contract policies and accounting to the requirements of the new standard and identifying the differences. We anticipate the adoption of this guidance will result in certain changes in the identification of deliverables in our contracts and allocation of transaction price. These multiple element contracts are primarily entered into under the Grid business unit. Additionally, this guidance could lead to recognizing certain revenue transactions sooner than in the past on certain contracts, as we will need to estimate the revenue we will be entitled to upon contract completion, and later on other contracts, such as Consulting and Statement of Work transactions, due to the lack of an enforceable right to payment for performance obligations satisfied over time. ~~We will continue to assess~~There are no changes in the accounting for our ~~contracts for any~~largest revenue stream which includes Inox Wind Ltd as our primary customer. Across other ~~impacts that may result. During~~revenue streams such as D-VAR® Equipment and D-VAR® Turnkey, the ~~second half~~timing of ~~fiscal 2017, we plan to assess our current~~ revenue ~~controls, and identify and implement any changes that may be necessary to comply with our new revenue policies and the provisions of ASU 2014-09, which~~recognition will be affected for multiple types of contracts, primarily multiple performance obligation contracts in ~~place as of April 1, 2018.~~

We are required to adopt the new standards in the first quarter of fiscal 2018 and expect to do so retrospectively with the cumulative effect of initially applying the guidance recognized at the date of initial application (the modified retrospective transition method). We are still evaluating the finalour Grid business unit, but those differences did not have a material impact ~~of this adoption method~~ on our consolidated financial statements. The adjustment to opening retained earnings was not significant for the period commencing on April 1, 2018. Additionally, the adoption of this new standard is not expected to have any tax impact on the consolidated financial statements. As part of this analysis, we evaluated our information technology capabilities and systems, and did not incur significant information technology costs to modify systems currently in place.

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, Financial Instruments-Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities. The amendments in ASU 2016-01 enhance the reporting model for financial instruments to provide users of financial statements with more decision-useful information. This ASU is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years. We ~~are currently evaluating the impact, if any, the adoption of~~adopted ASU 2016-01 ~~may have on~~effective April 1, 2018 and noted no significant impact to our consolidated financial statements.

In July 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-11, Topic 842, Leases - Targeted improvements. The amendments in ASU 2018-11 provide for the option to adopt the standard prospectively and recognize a cumulative-effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings as well as offer a new practical expedient that will allow us to elect, by class of underlying asset, to not separate non-lease and lease components in certain circumstances and instead to account for those components as a single item.

We are currently evaluating the provisions of ASU 2016-02 and its amendments, and assessing the impact the adoption of this guidance will have on our financial position, results of operations and disclosures. This process has included identifying the implementation team, applying the revised definition of a lease per Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") 842 to existing agreements and, from that information, creating a preliminary population. This population includes agreements identified from the following sources: existing leases under ASC 840, general ledger activity from recurring vendors and information reported from a survey provided to key individuals within the company. We intend to make the policy election to exclude all leases shorter than 12 months from the recognition of the recording of the right of use ("ROU") asset and related liabilities. We expect to elect the package of three practical expedients in regards to all leases that commenced before the effective date as well as the practical expedient that allows the use of hindsight in determining lease term. We anticipate the adoption of this guidance will result in certain changes to our financial statements to add the related asset and liability accounts for all of our operating leases. We will continue to assess our agreements for any other impacts that may result from the adoption of this standard. During the second half of fiscal 2018, we plan to finalize our population of leases including the classification of type of lease for each of those agreements and assess our current controls, as well as identify and implement any changes that may be necessary to comply with the provisions of ASU 2016-02, which will be effective on April 1, 2019.

We are required to adopt the new standards in the first quarter of fiscal 2019 and expect to do so using the modified retrospective transition ~~approach is required for lessees for capital and operating~~method, which will impact all leases existing at, or entered into after the ~~beginning~~period of adoption. For all leases existing at the ~~earliest comparative period presented in~~time of adoption we will recognize a cumulative effect adjustment to the ~~financial statements, with certain practical expedients available.~~opening balance of retained earnings as of April 1, 2019. We are ~~currently~~still evaluating the ~~effects adoption~~final impact of this ~~guidance will have~~adoption method on our consolidated financial statements.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments. The amendments in ASU 2016-13 provide more ~~decision useful~~decision-useful information about the expected credit losses on financial instruments and other commitments to extend credit held by a reporting entity at each reporting date. The ASU is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within that year. We are currently evaluating the impact, if any, the adoption of ASU 2016-13 may have on our consolidated financial statements.

•

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments. The amendments in ASU 2016-15 provide more guidance towards the classification of multiple different types of cash flows in order to reduce the diversity in reporting across entities.

•

In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash. The amendments in ASU 2016-18 explain the change during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. Therefore, amounts generally described as restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents should be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts shown on the statement of cash flows.

We ~~are currently evaluating the impact, if any, the adoption of~~adopted ASU 2016-15 and ASU 2016-18 ~~may have on~~effective April 1, 2018 and noted no significant impact to our consolidated financial statements.

In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-16, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory. The amendments in ASU 2016-16 improve the accounting for the income tax consequences of intra-entity transfers of assets other than inventory. The ASU is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within that year. We ~~are currently evaluating the impact, if any, the adoption~~adopted of ASU 2016-16 ~~may have on~~effective April 1, 2018 and noted no significant impact to our consolidated financial statements.

~~In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-01,~~ ~~Business Combinations~~. The amendments in ASU 2017-01 clarify the definition of a business with the objective of adding guidance to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. The ASU is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those periods. We adopted ASU 2017-01 effective September 30, 2017, following the acquisition of ITC. We considered these amendments in our decision to record the combination of the entities as an Acquisition. See Note 4, "Acquisitions and Related Goodwill", for further details. These impacts have been included in the consolidated financial statements.

~~In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-03,~~ ~~Accounting Changes and Error Corrections (Topic 250) and Investments - Equity Method and Joint Ventures~~. The amendments in ASU 2017-03 provide additional detail surrounding disclosures required related to adoption of new pronouncements. The ASU is effective for the periods of each related pronouncement. We are currently evaluating the impact the adoption of ASU 2017-03 may have on our consolidated financial statements.

~~In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04,~~ ~~Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment.~~ The amendments in ASU 2017-04 eliminated the prior requirement to perform procedures to determine the fair value at the impairment testing date of an entity's assets and liabilities (including unrecognized assets and liabilities) following the procedure that would be required in determining the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination. Under the new guidelines an entity should perform its annual, or interim, goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount. An entity should recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value. The ASU is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted for interim or annual goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017. Following the Acquisition of ITC, we performed an analysis and determined that the transaction included a portion of goodwill. We have accounted for that value on our balance sheet as of September 30, 2017. See Note 4, "Acquisitions and Related Goodwill" for further details. Given the results of our analysis, we adopted ASU 2017-04 effective September 30, 2017, and determined there were no triggering events requiring further impairment analysis at this time. The Company expects to perform its annual impairment test during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017.

In February 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-05, Other Income - Gains and Losses from the Derecognition of Non-financial Assets (Subtopic 610-20). The amendments in ASU 2017-05 clarify the scope of Subtopic 610-20, Other Income-Gains and Losses from the Derecognition of Non-financial Assets, and to add guidance for partial sales of non-financial assets. Subtopic 610-20, which was issued in May 2014 as a part of ~~Accounting Standards Update~~ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), provides guidance for recognizing gains and losses from the transfer of non-financial assets in contracts with non-customers. We ~~are currently evaluating the impact the adoption of~~adopted ASU 2017-05 ~~may have~~effective April 1, 2018 and adjusted the opening balance of accumulated deficit for $0.1 million for recognition of the deferred gain on ~~our consolidated financial statements.~~the sale of the 64 Jackson Road building that occurred on March 28, 2018.

In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-09, Compensation - Stock Compensation (Subtopic 718) Scope of Modification Accounting. The amendments in ASU 2017-09 provide clarity and reduce both (1) diversity in practice and (2) cost and complexity when applying the guidance in Topic 718, Compensation—Stock Compensation, to a change to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award. The ASU is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those periods. We ~~are currently evaluating the impact the adoption of~~adopted ASU 2017-09 ~~may have on~~effective April 1, 2018 and noted no significant impact to our consolidated financial statements.

In August 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-12, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities. The amendments in ASU 2017-12 provide improved financial reporting of hedging relationships to better portray the economic results of an entity’s risk management activities in its financial statements. In addition, the amendments in this update make certain targeted improvements to simplify the application of the hedge accounting guidance. The ASU is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those periods. We are currently evaluating the impact the adoption of ASU 2017-12 may have on our consolidated financial statements.

In June 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-07, Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Non-Employee Share Based Payment Accounting. The amendments in ASU 2018-07 provide for the simplification of the measurement of share-based payment transactions for acquiring goods and services from non-employees. The ASU is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those periods. We are currently evaluating the impact the adoption of ASU 2018-07 and do not expect it to have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-13, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement. The amendments in ASU 2018-13 provide for increased effectiveness of the disclosures made around fair value measurements while including consideration for costs and benefits. The ASU is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those periods. We are currently evaluating the impact the adoption of ASU 2018-13 may have on our consolidated financial statements.

We do not believe that, outside of those disclosed here, there are any other recently issued accounting pronouncements that will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.


ITEM 3.	QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

We face exposure to financial market risks such as adverse movements in foreign currency exchange rates. These exposures may change over time as our business practices evolve and could have a material adverse impact on our financial results. Our market risk profile as of September 30, 2017 has not materially changed since March 31, 2017. Our market risk profile as of March 31, 2017 is disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017, filed with the SEC on May 25, 2017.Not Applicable


ITEM 4.	CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of September 30, ~~2017.~~2018. The term “disclosure controls and procedures,” as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act, means controls and other procedures of a company that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives and management necessarily applies its judgment in evaluating

the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. Based on that evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of September 30, ~~2017,~~2018, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of such date, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There were no changes into our internal ~~control~~controls over financial reporting during the quarter ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II—OTHER INFORMATION


ITEM 1.	LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

On September 13, 2011, we commenced a series of legal actions in China against Sinovel. Our Chinese subsidiary, Suzhou AMSC Superconductor Co. Ltd., filed a claim for arbitration with the Beijing Arbitration Commission in accordance with the terms of our supply contracts with Sinovel. The case is captioned (2011) Jing Zhong An Zi No. ~~0963~~0693. On March 31, 2011, Sinovel refused to accept contracted shipments of 1.5 MW and 3 MW wind turbine core electrical components and spare parts that we were prepared to deliver. We allege that these actions constitute material breaches of our contracts because Sinovel did not give us notice that it intended to delay deliveries as required under the contracts. Moreover, we allege that Sinovel has refused to pay past due amounts for prior shipments of core electrical components and spare parts. We are seeking compensation for past product shipments and retention (including interest) in the amount of approximately RMB 485 million (approximately $73 million) due to Sinovel’s breaches of our contracts. We are also seeking specific performance of our existing contracts as well as reimbursement of all costs and reasonable expenses with respect to the arbitration. The value of the undelivered components under the existing contracts, including the deliveries refused by Sinovel in March 2011, amounts to approximately RMB 4.6 billion (approximately $691 million).

On October 8, 2011, Sinovel filed with the Beijing Arbitration Commission an application under the caption (2011) Jing Zhong An Zi No. ~~0963,~~0693, for a counterclaim against us for breach of the same contracts under which we filed our original arbitration claim. Sinovel claims, among other things, that the goods supplied by us do not conform to the standards specified in the contracts and claims damages in the amount of approximately RMB 370 million (approximately $56 million). On October 17, 2011, Sinovel filed with the Beijing Arbitration Commission a request for change of counterclaim to increase its damage claim to approximately RMB 1 billion (approximately $150 million). On December 22, 2011, Sinovel filed with the Beijing Arbitration Commission an additional request for change of counterclaim to increase its damages claim to approximately RMB 1.2 billion (approximately $180 million). On February 27, 2012, Sinovel filed with the Beijing Arbitration Commission an application under the caption ~~(2012) Jing Zhong An Zi No. 0157,~~ against us for breach of the same contracts under which we filed our original arbitration claim. Sinovel claims, among other things, that the goods supplied by us do not conform to the standards specified in the contracts and claims damages in the amount of approximately RMB 105 million (approximately $16 million). We believe that Sinovel’s claims are without merit and we intend to defend these actions vigorously. Since the proceedings in this matter are still in the early technical review phase, we cannot reasonably estimate possible losses or range of losses at this time.

We also submitted a civil action application to the Beijing No. 1 Intermediate People’s Court under the caption (2011) Yi Zhong Min Chu Zi No. 15524, against Sinovel for software copyright infringement on September 13, 2011. The application alleges Sinovel’s unauthorized use of portions of our wind turbine control software source code developed for Sinovel’s 1.5MW wind turbines and the binary code, or upper layer, of our software for the PM3000 power converters in 1.5MW wind turbines. In July 2011, a former employee of our Austrian subsidiary was arrested in Austria on charges of economic espionage and fraudulent manipulation of data. In September 2011, the former employee pled guilty to the charges, and was imprisoned. As a result of our internal investigation and a criminal investigation conducted by Austrian authorities,addition, we believe that this former employee was contracted by Sinovel through an intermediary while employed by us and improperly obtained and transferred to Sinovel portions of our wind turbine control software source code developed for Sinovel’s 1.5MW wind turbines. Moreover, we believe the former employee illegally used source code to develop for Sinovel a software modification to circumvent the encryption and remove technical protection measures on the PM3000 power converters in 1.5MW wind turbines in the field. We are seeking a cease and desist order with respect to the unauthorized copying, installation and use of our software, monetary damages of approximately RMB 38 million (approximately $6 million) for our economic losses and reimbursement of all costs and reasonable expenses. The Beijing No. 1 Intermediate People’s Court accepted the case, which was necessary in order for the case to proceed. On September 15, 2014, the Beijing No. 1 Intermediate People’s Court held its first substantive hearing in the Beijing case. At the hearing, the parties presented evidence, reviewed claims, and answered questions from the court. On April 24, 2015, we received notification from the Beijing No. 1 Intermediate People’s Court that it dismissed the case for what it cited was a lack of evidence. On May 6, 2015, we filed an appeal of the Beijing No. 1 Intermediate People’s Court decision to dismiss the case with the Beijing Higher People’s Court. On September 8, 2015, the Beijing Higher People’s Court held its first substantive hearing on our appeal of the

Beijing No. 1 Intermediate People’s Court’s dismissal of the case. At the hearing, the parties presented evidence and answered questions from the court. We are awaiting a decision from the Beijing Higher People’s Court.

We submitted a civil action application to the Beijing Higher People’s Court against Sinovel and certain of its employees for trade secret infringement on September 13, 2011 under the caption (2011) Gao Min Chu Zi No. 4193. ~~The application alleges~~

In connection with the ~~defendants’ unauthorized use of portions of our wind turbine control software source code developed for Sinovel’s 1.5MW wind turbines as~~Settlement Agreement described ~~above with respect~~in Note 16 “Commitment and Contingencies,” on July 5, 2018, we and Sinovel submitted withdrawal applications to terminate the foregoing Proceedings to the ~~Copyright Action. We are seeking monetary damages of approximately RMB 2.9 billion (approximately $436 million) for the trade secret infringement as well as reimbursement of all costs~~relevant Chinese courts and ~~reasonable expenses. The Beijing Higher People’s Court has accepted the case, which was necessary in order for the case to proceed. On December 22, 2011~~ the Beijing ~~Higher People’s Court transferred~~Arbitration Commission. Subject to our and Sinovel’s compliance with the ~~case~~terms of the Settlement Agreement, we and Sinovel have agreed not to re-institute any of the ~~Beijing No. 1 Intermediate People’s Court under the caption (2011) Gao Min Chu Zi No. 4193.~~ ~~On June 7, 2012, we received an Acceptance Notice from the Beijing No.1 Intermediate People’s Court under the caption~~ ~~(2012) Yi Zhong Min Chu Zi No.6833.~~ The Beijing No. 1 Intermediate Court held the first substantive hearing on May 11, 2015. On June 15, 2015, we submitted a request for the withdrawal of our complaint to the Beijing No. 1 Intermediate Court. On June 16, 2015, the Beijing No. 1 Intermediate Court granted our request. We immediately filed a civil action application to the Beijing Intellectual Property Court against the same parties and seeking the same amount of monetary damages for trade secret infringement on June 16, 2015 under the caption (2015) ~~Jin Zhi Min Chu Zi No. 1135.~~ On January 18, 2016, the Beijing Intellectual Property Court held its first substantive hearing on our trade secret infringement case. At the hearing, the parties presented evidence, reviewed claims and answered questions from the court. We are awaiting a decision from the Beijing Intellectual Property Court.Proceedings.

On September 16, 2011, we filed a civil copyright infringement complaint in the Hainan Province No. 1 Intermediate People’s Court against Dalian Guotong Electric Co. Ltd. (“Guotong”), a supplier of power converter products to Sinovel, and Huaneng Hainan Power, Inc. ~~(“Huaneng”)~~, a wind farm operator that has purchased Sinovel wind turbines containing Guotong power converter products. The case is captioned (2011) Hainan Yi Zhong Min Chu Zi No. 62. The application alleges that our PM1000 converters in certain Sinovel wind turbines have been replaced by converters produced by Guotong. Because the Guotong converters are being used in wind turbines containing our wind turbine control software, we believe that our copyrighted software is being infringed. We are seeking a cease and desist order with respect to the unauthorized use of our software, monetary damages of approximately RMB 1.2 million (approximately $0.2 million) for our economic losses (with respect to Guotong only) and reimbursement of all costs and reasonable expenses. The court has accepted the case, which was necessary in order for the case to proceed. In addition, upon the request of the defendant Huaneng, Sinovel has been added by the court to this case as a defendant and Huaneng has been released from this case. On November 18, 2014, the Hainan No. 1 Intermediate People’s Court held its first substantive hearing in the Hainan case. At the hearing, the parties presented evidence, reviewed claims, and answered questions from the court. On June 3, 2015, we received notification from the Hainan No. 1 Intermediate People’s Court that it dismissed the case for what it cited was a lack of evidence. On June 18, 2015 we filed an appeal of the Hainan No. 1 Intermediate People’s Court decision to dismiss the case with the Hainan Higher People’s Court. On August 20, 2015, the Hainan Higher People’s Court accepted the appeal under the caption (2015) ~~QiongZhi MinZhongZi No.~~6~~. On November 26, 2015, the Hainan Higher People’s Court held its first substantive hearing on our appeal of the Hainan No. 1 Intermediate People’s Court’s dismissal of the case.~~ On August 17, 2016, we received notification from the Hainan Higher People’s Court that it dismissed the case for what it cited was a lack of evidence. WeDue to the Settlement Agreement with Sinovel, we no longer intend to ~~file an~~ appeal ~~of the Hainan Higher People’s Court’s decision with China’s Supreme People’s Court. China’s Supreme People’s Court has discretion to decide whether to hear the appeal.~~this decision.


ITEM 1A.	RISK FACTORS

~~There~~

Except as noted below there have been no material changes ~~in the six months ended September 30, 2017~~ to the risk factors described in Part I, Item IA of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, ~~2017,~~2018, filed with the SEC on June 6, 2018.

We face risks relating to our settlement with Sinovel.

On July 3, 2018, we and our wholly-owned subsidiaries AMSC China and AMSC Austria entered into a Settlement Agreement with Sinovel. The Settlement Agreement settles the litigation and arbitration proceedings between us and Sinovel, as further described elsewhere in this Quarterly Report. Under the terms of the Settlement Agreement, Sinovel has agreed to pay AMSC China an aggregate cash amount in Renminbi (RMB) equivalent to $57.5 million, consisting of two installments. Sinovel paid the first installment equivalent of $32.5 million on July 4, 2018, and has agreed to pay the second installment equivalent of $25.0 million by May ~~25, 2017.~~6, 2019, which payment has been guaranteed by Mr. Wenyuan Wei, former Sinovel chairman and a current Sinovel shareholder. Sinovel or Mr. Wei may fail to make this second payment by May 6, 2019, or at all. If we do not receive the second installment payment from either Sinovel or Mr. Wei in a timely manner or at all, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected. In addition, there is no assurance that the relevant taxing authorities will agree with our assessment of the taxes that will be required in relation to foregoing payments.

In addition, if Sinovel and Mr. Wei fail to adhere to the terms of the Settlement Agreement, we may re-file our claims against Sinovel in the Chinese courts and/or with the Beijing Arbitration Commission. The Chinese courts and/or the Beijing Arbitration Commission may not accept any re-filing by us. If we are unable to re-file one or more proceedings, we may be unable to pursue our former claims against Sinovel and unable to recover damages for such claims, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.


ITEM 2.	UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

None


ITEM 3.	DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

None


ITEM 4.	MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not Applicable


ITEM 5.	OTHER INFORMATION

None


ITEM 6.	EXHIBITS

See the Exhibit Index on the page immediately preceding the exhibits for a list of exhibits filed as part of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, which Exhibit Index is incorporated herein by this reference.

EXHIBIT INDEX

Incorporated by Reference
Exhibit
Number
Exhibit Description Form File No. Exhibit
Filing
Date

Filed/Furnished
Herewith
10.1
First Amendment to Executive Severance Agreement, effective as of July 31, 2017, between the Registrant and John W. Kosiba.

10.1 *

31.1
Chief Executive Officer—Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
*

31.2
Chief Financial Officer—Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
*

32.1
Chief Executive Officer—Certification pursuant to Rule13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
**

32.2
Chief Financial Officer—Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
**

101.INS XBRL Instance Document.***

101.SCH XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document. ***

101.CAL XBRL Taxonomy Calculation Linkbase Document. ***

101.DEF XBRL Definition Linkbase Document. ***

101.LAB XBRL Taxonomy Label Linkbase Document. ***

101.PRE XBRL Taxonomy Presentation Linkbase Document. ***

Incorporated by Reference

Exhibit

Number

Exhibit Description

Form

File No.

Exhibit

Filing

Date

Filed/Furnished

Herewith

10.1

Fiscal 2018 Executive Incentive Plan.

8-K

000-19672

10.1

7/3/18

10.2

Settlement Agreement, entered into by the Company on July 3, 2018.

8-K

000-19672

10.1

7/9/18

10.3

Letter of Guarantee, dated July 3, 2018.

8-K

000-19672

10.2

7/9/18

10.4

Form of Option Surrender Agreement under 2007 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended.

31.1

Chief Executive Officer—Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2

Chief Financial Officer—Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1

Chief Executive Officer—Certification pursuant to Rule13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2

Chief Financial Officer—Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

101.INS

XBRL Instance Document.***

101.SCH

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document. ***

101.CAL

XBRL Taxonomy Calculation Linkbase Document. ***

101.DEF

XBRL Definition Linkbase Document. ***

101.LAB

XBRL Taxonomy Label Linkbase Document. ***

101.PRE

XBRL Taxonomy Presentation Linkbase Document. ***

_________________________


*	Filed herewith


**	Furnished herewith


***	Submitted electronically herewith

Attached as Exhibits 101 to this report are the following formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of September 30, ~~2017~~2018 and March 31, ~~2017~~2018 (ii) Condensed Statements of Operations and Income for the three and six months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016,~~2017, (iii) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive (Loss) Income for the three and six months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016,~~2017, (iv) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016,~~2017, and (v) Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.



		AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORPORATION

Date:	November ~~7, 2017~~6, 2018	By:	/s/ John W. Kosiba, Jr.
			John W. Kosiba, Jr.
			Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)



	September 30, 2017	September 30, 2016		September 30, 2017	September 30, 2016
Expected volatility	N/A	67.6	%	N/A	67.6	%
Risk-free interest rate	N/A	1.3	%	N/A	1.3	%
Expected life (years)	N/A	5.7		N/A	5.7
Dividend yield	N/A	None		N/A	None



	September 25, 2017
Consideration
Cash	$	0.1
Equity (884,890 shares of common stock at $4.02 per share)	3.6
Contingent consideration	0.6
Total Consideration	$	4.3

Recognized amounts of identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed
Core technology and know-how	$	3.4
Working capital	0.2
Property, plant and equipment	0.0
Total identifiable net assets	$	3.6
Long-term deferred tax liability	1.1
Goodwill allocated	$	1.7



	Warrants
April 1, 2016	$	3,227
Mark to market adjustment	(1,304		)
Balance at March 31, 2017	$	1,923



Fiscal Year 16	March 31, 2017	December 31, 2016	September 30, 2016	June 30, 2016	March 31, 2016
Risk-free interest rate	0.91%	0.56%	0.59%	0.48%	0.66%
Expected annual dividend yield	—	—	—	—	—
Expected volatility	44.12%	58.04%	70.50%	76.30%	76.76%
Term (years)	0.51	0.76	1.01	1.26	1.51
Fair value	$—	$0.1 million	$0.2 million	$0.4 million	$0.4 million



Fiscal Year 17	September 30, 2017	September 25, 2017
Risk-free interest rate	1.09%	1.09%
Expected annual dividend yield	—	—
Expected volatility	66.54%	65.71%
Term (years)	0.31	0.32
Fair value	$0.4 million	$0.6 million

Large accelerated filer ¨

Accelerated filer x

Non-accelerated filer ¨

~~(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)~~

Smaller reporting company ¨x

Emerging growth company ¨