UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549


FORM 10-Q


x

Quarterly Report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the quarterly period ended: December 31, 2017

ended September 30, 2022

¨

Transition Report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the transition period from _____ to _____.

Commission File Number: 0-19672


American Superconductor Corporation

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Delaware

04-2959321

Delaware04-2959321

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

64 Jackson Rd. Devens,

114 East Main St. Ayer, Massachusetts

01434

01432

(Address of principal executive offices)

(Zip Code)

(978) 842-3000

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

N/A

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class

Trading Symbol(s)

Name of each exchange on which registered

Common Stock,
$0.01 par value per share

AMSC

Nasdaq Global Select Market

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).     Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer ¨

Accelerated filer x

Non-accelerated filer ¨

(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Smaller reporting company ¨

Emerging growth company ¨

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No   x

Shares outstanding of the Registrant’s common stock:

Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share

20,936,769

29,239,730

Class

Outstanding as of February 1, 2018October 28, 2022







AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORPORATION

INDEX

Page No.

Page No.

PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.

Item 2.

Item 3.

Item 4.

PART II—OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.

Item 1A.

Item 2.

Item 3.

Item 4.

Item 5.

Item 6.

33

41



AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORPORATION

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands)

  

September 30, 2022

  

March 31, 2022

 

ASSETS

        

Current assets:

        

Cash and cash equivalents

 $27,811  $40,584 

Accounts receivable, net

  20,391   20,280 

Inventory, net

  36,342   23,666 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

  6,861   7,052 

Restricted cash

  3,574   2,754 

Total current assets

  94,979   94,336 
         

Property, plant and equipment, net

  12,798   13,656 

Intangibles, net

  9,911   11,311 

Right-of-use assets

  3,274   3,502 

Goodwill

  43,471   43,471 

Restricted cash

  5,968   6,148 

Deferred tax assets

  1,023   1,224 

Other assets

  323   239 

Total assets

 $171,747  $173,887 
         

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

        
         

Current liabilities:

        

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

 $36,082  $29,140 

Lease liability, current portion

  822   740 

Debt, current portion

  72   72 

Contingent consideration

  1,080   1,200 

Deferred revenue, current portion

  28,824   22,812 

Total current liabilities

 $66,880   53,964 
         

Deferred revenue, long-term portion

  6,630   7,222 

Lease liability, long-term portion

  2,572   2,900 

Deferred tax liabilities

  203   297 

Debt, long-term portion

  58   90 

Other liabilities

  21   25 

Total liabilities

  76,364   64,498 
         

Commitments and Contingencies (Note 16)

          
         

Stockholders' equity:

        

Common stock

  293   289 

Additional paid-in capital

  1,136,028   1,133,536 

Treasury stock

  (3,639)  (3,639)

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

  1,798   (291)

Accumulated deficit

  (1,039,097)  (1,020,506)

Total stockholders' equity

  95,383   109,389 

Total liabilities and stockholders' equity

 $171,747  $173,887 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements

 December 31,
2017
 March 31,
2017
ASSETS   
Current assets:   
     Cash and cash equivalents$22,113
 $26,784
     Accounts receivable, net12,052
 7,956
     Inventory17,129
 17,462
     Prepaid expenses and other current assets2,822
 2,703
     Restricted cash
 795
          Total current assets54,116
 55,700
    
     Property, plant and equipment, net36,684
 43,438
     Intangibles, net3,315
 301
     Goodwill1,719
 
     Restricted cash165
 165
     Deferred tax assets545
 407
     Other assets227
 233
          Total assets$96,771
 $100,244
    
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY   
    
Current liabilities:   
Accounts payable and accrued expenses$15,486
 $14,490
Note payable, current portion, net of discount of $19 as of March 31, 2017
 1,481
Derivative liabilities1,142
 1,923
Deferred revenue14,194
 14,323
          Total current liabilities30,822
 32,217
    
Deferred revenue8,425
 7,631
Deferred tax liabilities125
 125
Other liabilities54
 45
          Total liabilities39,426
 40,018
    
Commitments and contingencies (Note 14)

 

    
Stockholders' equity:   
Common stock211
 147
Additional paid-in capital1,040,348
 1,017,510
Treasury stock(1,645) (1,371)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)770
 (503)
Accumulated deficit(982,339) (955,557)
           Total stockholders' equity57,345
 60,226
           Total liabilities and stockholders' equity$96,771
 $100,244

AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORPORATION

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(In thousands, except per share data)

  

Three Months Ended

  

Six Months Ended

 
  

September 30,

  

September 30,

 
  

2022

  

2021

  

2022

  

2021

 

Revenues

 $27,680  $27,908  $50,360  $53,328 
                 

Cost of revenues

  25,710   24,647   46,169   46,698 
                 

Gross margin

  1,970   3,261   4,191   6,630 
                 

Operating expenses:

                

Research and development

  2,314   2,669   4,992   5,711 

Selling, general and administrative

  7,350   6,697   14,911   13,838 

Amortization of acquisition-related intangibles

  688   627   1,369   1,212 

Change in fair value of contingent consideration

  (290)  (2,430)  (120)  (2,330)

Total operating expenses

  10,062   7,563   21,152   18,431 
                 

Operating loss

  (8,092)  (4,302)  (16,961)  (11,801)
                 

Interest income, net

  45   25   70   57 

China dissolution

  (1,921)  -   (1,921)  - 

Other income (expense), net

  73   24   240   (40)

Loss before income tax expense

  (9,895)  (4,253)  (18,572)  (11,784)
                 

Income tax expense (benefit)

  (14)  181   18   (1,947)
                 

Net loss

 $(9,881) $(4,434) $(18,590) $(9,837)
                 

Net loss per common share

                

Basic

 $(0.35) $(0.16) $(0.67) $(0.36)

Diluted

 $(0.35) $(0.16) $(0.67) $(0.36)
                 

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding

                

Basic

  27,867   27,252   27,714   27,040 

Diluted

  27,867   27,252   27,714   27,040 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.



AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORPORATION

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

(In thousands, except per share data) thousands)

  

Three Months Ended

  

Six Months Ended

 
  

September 30,

  

September 30,

 
  

2022

  

2021

  

2022

  

2021

 

Net loss

 $(9,881) $(4,434) $(18,590) $(9,837)

Other comprehensive (loss) gain, net of tax:

                

China dissolution

  1,921   -   1,921   - 

Foreign currency translation (loss) gain

  105   24   168   (39)

Total other comprehensive (loss) gain, net of tax

  2,026   24   2,089   (39)

Comprehensive loss

 $(7,855) $(4,410) $(16,501) $(9,876)
 Three months ended
December 31,
 Nine months ended
December 31,
 2017 2016 2017 2016
Revenues$14,933
 $27,148
 $34,904
 $59,000
        
Cost of revenues9,917
 22,107
 34,103
 50,992
        
Gross margin5,016
 5,041
 801
 8,008
        
Operating expenses:       
   Research and development3,023
 2,985
 8,690
 8,804
   Selling, general and administrative5,486
 6,077
 16,964
 19,640
   Amortization of acquisition-related intangibles85
 39
 98
 118
   Change in fair value of contingent consideration272
 
 71
 
   Restructuring1
 
 1,328
 
      Total operating expenses8,867
 9,101
 27,151
 28,562
        
Operating loss(3,851) (4,060) (26,350) (20,554)
        
Change in fair value of warrants399
 101
 1,468
 667
Gain on sale of minority interest
 325
 951
 325
Interest income (expense), net49
 (89) 94
 (331)
Other (expense)/income, net(279) 873
 (2,449) 481
Loss before income tax (benefit) expense(3,682) (2,850) (26,286) (19,412)
        
Income tax (benefit) expense566
 (82) 496
 1,036
        
Net loss$(4,248) $(2,768) $(26,782) $(20,448)
        
Net loss per common share       
   Basic$(0.21) $(0.20) $(1.44) $(1.49)
   Diluted$(0.21) $(0.20) $(1.44) $(1.49)
        
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding       
   Basic19,949
 13,792
 18,614
 13,746
   Diluted19,949
 13,792
 18,614
 13,746

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.




AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORPORATION

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

FOR THE THREE and six MONTHS ENDED September 30, 2022 AND 2021

(In thousands)

  

Common Stock

  

Additional

      Accumulated Other      

Total

 
  Number of Shares  Par Value  Paid-in Capital  Treasury Stock  Comprehensive Loss  Accumulated Deficit  Stockholders' Equity 

Balance at March 31, 2022

  28,920  $289  $1,133,536  $(3,639) $(291) $(1,020,506) $109,389 

Issuance of common stock - restricted shares, net of forfeited shares

  (9)                  

Stock-based compensation expense

        1,033            1,033 

Issuance of stock for 401(k) match

  28      138            138 

Cumulative translation adjustment

              63      63 

Net loss

                 (8,710)  (8,710)

Balance at June 30, 2022

  28,939  $289  $1,134,707  $(3,639) $(228) $(1,029,216) $101,913 

Issuance of common stock - ESPP

  34      127            127 

Issuance of common stock - restricted shares

  331   3   (3)            

Stock-based compensation expense

        1,019            1,019 

Issuance of stock for 401(k) match

  33   1   178            179 

Cumulative translation adjustment

              2,026      2,026 

Net loss

                 (9,881)  (9,881)

Balance at September 30, 2022

  29,337  $293  $1,136,028  $(3,639) $1,798  $(1,039,097) $95,383 

  

Common Stock

  

Additional

      Accumulated Other      

Total

 
  Number of Shares  Par Value  Paid-in Capital  Treasury Stock  Comprehensive Loss  Accumulated Deficit  Stockholders' Equity 

Balance at March 31, 2021

  27,988  $280  $1,121,495  $(3,593) $(277) $(1,001,313) $116,592 

Issuance of common stock - bonus payout

  111   1   1,681            1,682 

Issuance of common stock - restricted shares

  318   3   (3)            

Stock-based compensation expense

        1,292            1,292 

Issuance of stock for 401(k) match

  7      112            112 

Neeltran acquisition

  302   3   4,384            4,387 

Repurchase of treasury stock

           (46)        (46)

Cumulative translation adjustment

              (63)     (63)

Net loss

                 (5,403)  (5,403)

Balance at June 30, 2021

  28,726  $287  $1,128,961  $(3,639) $(340) $(1,006,716) $118,553 

Issuance of common stock - ESPP

  10      125            125 

Issuance of common stock - bonus payout

  47   1   597            598 

Stock-based compensation expense

        1,101            1,101 

Issuance of stock for 401(k) match

  10      137            137 

Cumulative translation adjustment

              24      24 

Net loss

                 (4,434)  (4,434)

Balance at September 30, 2021

  28,793  $288  $1,130,921  $(3,639) $(316) $(1,011,150) $116,104 
 Three months ended
December 31,
 Nine months ended
December 31,
 2017 2016 2017 2016
Net loss$(4,248) $(2,768) $(26,782) $(20,448)
Other comprehensive gain (loss), net of tax:       
     Foreign currency translation gain (loss)52
 (831) 1,273
 (1,372)
Total other comprehensive gain (loss), net of tax52
 (831) 1,273
 (1,372)
Comprehensive loss$(4,196) $(3,599) $(25,509) $(21,820)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.




AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORPORATION

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In thousands)

  

Six Months Ended September 30,

 
  

2022

  

2021

 

Cash flows from operating activities:

        
         

Net loss

 $(18,590) $(9,837)

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operations:

        

Depreciation and amortization

  2,799   2,631 

Stock-based compensation expense

  2,052   2,393 

Provision for excess and obsolete inventory

  1,015   1,203 

Deferred income taxes

  63   (2,137)

Change in fair value of contingent consideration

  (120)  (2,330)

China dissolution

  1,921   - 

Other non-cash items

  (134)  197 

Unrealized foreign exchange loss on cash and cash equivalents

  (3)  1 

Changes in operating asset and liability accounts:

        

Accounts receivable

  (92)  (8,657)

Inventory

  (13,749)  (475)

Prepaid expenses and other assets

  211   1,521 

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

  6,885   3,475 

Deferred revenue

  6,170   281 

Net cash used in operating activities

  (11,572)  (11,734)
         

Cash flows from investing activities:

        

Purchase of property, plant and equipment

  (560)  (510)

Cash paid for acquisition, net of cash acquired

  -   (11,479)

Proceeds from the maturity of marketable securities

  -   5,189 

Change in other assets

  (99)  (30)

Net cash used in investing activities

  (659)  (6,830)
         

Cash flows from financing activities:

        

Repurchase of treasury stock

  -   (46)

Repayment of debt

  (33)  (18)

Proceeds from exercise of employee stock options and ESPP

  128   125 

Net cash provided by financing activities

  95   61 
         

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash

  4   (47)
         

Net decrease in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash

  (12,132)  (18,550)

Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of period

  49,486   75,539 

Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of period

 $37,354  $56,989 
         

Supplemental schedule of cash flow information:

        

Cash paid for income taxes, net of refunds

 $152  $306 

Non-cash investing and financing activities

        

Issuance of common stock to settle liabilities

 $317  $2,529 
 Nine months ended
December 31,
 2017 2016
Cash flows from operating activities:   
    
   Net loss$(26,782) $(20,448)
   Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operations:   
      Depreciation and amortization9,239
 5,606
      Stock-based compensation expense2,115
 2,266
      Provision for excess and obsolete inventory415
 1,074
        Gain on sale of minority interest(951) (325)
        Change in fair value of warrants and contingent consideration(1,397) (667)
        Non-cash interest expense19
 127
        Other non-cash items81
 (937)
Changes in operating asset and liability accounts:   
         Accounts receivable(3,576) 3,213
         Inventory180
 (2,294)
         Prepaid expenses and other current assets647
 2,283
         Accounts payable and accrued expenses638
 (4,031)
         Deferred revenue(862) 3,598
   Net cash used in operating activities(20,234) (10,535)
    
Cash flows from investing activities:   
      Purchase of property, plant and equipment(2,125) (557)
      Proceeds from the sale of property, plant and equipment18
 15
      Change in restricted cash795
 457
      Cash paid for acquisition, net of cash acquired74
 
      Proceeds from sale of minority interest951
 325
      Change in other assets26
 117
   Net cash (used in)/provided by investing activities(261) 357
    
Cash flows from financing activities:   
      Employee taxes paid related to net settlement of equity awards(274) (490)
      Repayment of debt(1,575) (3,167)
      Proceeds from public equity offering, net16,952
 
      Proceeds from exercise of employee stock options and ESPP85
 
   Net cash provided by/(used in) financing activities15,188
 (3,657)
    
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents636
 (432)
    
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents(4,671) (14,267)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year26,784
 39,330
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year$22,113
 $25,063
    
Supplemental schedule of cash flow information:   
      Issuance of common stock in connection with the purchase of Infinia Technology Corporation$3,498
 $
      Cash paid for income taxes, net of refunds1,012
 920
      Issuance of common stock to settle liabilities252
 289
      Cash paid for interest42
 238

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.



AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORPORATION

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


1. Nature of the Business and Operations and Liquidity

Nature of the Business and Operations

American Superconductor Corporation (“AMSC”(together with its subsidiaries, “AMSC®” or the “Company”) was founded on April 9,1987. The Company is a leading system provider of megawatt-scale power resiliency solutions that lowerOrchestrate the costRhythm and Harmony of wind powerPower on the Grid™ and enhancethat protect and expand the capability of the Navy’s fleet. The Company’s system level products leverage its proprietary “smart materials” and “smart software and controls” to provide enhanced resiliency and improved performance of themegawatt-scale power grid. In the wind power market, the Company enables manufacturers to field wind turbines through its advanced engineering, support services and power electronics products. In the power grid market, the Company enables electric utilities and renewable energy project developers to connect, transmit and distribute power through its transmission planning services and power electronics and superconductor-based products. The Company’s wind and power grid products and services provide exceptional reliability, security, efficiency and affordability to its customers.

flow.

These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared on a going concern basis in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) and the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (“SEC”) instructions to Form 10-Q.10-Q. The going concern basis of presentation assumes that the Company will continue operations and will be able to realize its assets and discharge its liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in the financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been condensed or omitted pursuant to those instructions. The year-end condensed balance sheet data was derived from audited financial statements but does not include all disclosures required by GAAP. The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements, in the opinion of management, reflect all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair statement of the results for the interim periods ended December 31, 2017 September 30, 2022 and 20162021 and the financial position at December 31, 2017;September 30,2022; however, these results are not necessarily indicative of results which may be expected for the full year. The interim condensed consolidated financial statements, and notes thereto, should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended March 31, 2017, 2022, and notes thereto, included in the Company’s annual reportAnnual Report on Form 10-K10-K for the year ended March 31, 2017 2022 filed with the Securities and Exchange CommissionSEC on May 25, 2017.

June 1, 2022.

Liquidity

The Company has historically experienced recurring operating losses and as of December 31, 2017,September 30, 2022, the Company had an accumulated deficit of $982.3$1,039 million. In addition, the Company has historically experienced recurring negative operating cash flows. At December 31, 2017,September 30, 2022, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of $22.1 million, with no outstanding debt other than ordinary trade payables.$27.8 million. Cash used in operations for the ninesix months ended December 31, 2017September 30, 2022 was $20.2$11.6 million.

From April 1, 2011 through the date of this filing,

In February 2021, the Company has reduced its global workforce substantially, includingfiled a restructuring action announcedshelf registration statement on April 4, 2017 which led to a $1.3 million restructuring chargeForm S-3 that will expire in February 2024 (the nine months ended December 31, 2017. See Note 15 "Restructuring" for further discussion of this action.“Form S-3”). The Company has taken actions to consolidate certain business operations to reduce facility costs.  As of December 31, 2017,Form S-3 allows the Company had a global workforceto offer and sell from time-to-time up to $250 million of 275 persons.common stock, debt securities, warrants or units comprised of any combination of these securities. The Company plansForm S-3 is intended to closely monitor its expenses and, if required, expects to further reduce operating costs and capital spending to enhance liquidity.

Over the last several years,provide the Company has entered into equity financing arrangementsflexibility to conduct registered sales of the Company's securities, subject to market conditions, in order to enhance liquidity.  Since April 1, 2012,fund the Company's future capital needs. The terms of any future offering under the Form S-3 will be established at the time of such offering and will be described in a prospectus supplement filed with the SEC prior to the completion of any such offering.

The COVID-19 pandemic continues to rapidly evolve. While the COVID-19 pandemic has not materially disrupted the Company's business to date, any future actions necessitated by the COVID-19 pandemic may result in disruption to the Company's business. In addition, the Company has generated aggregate cash flowsis experiencing substantial inflationary pressure in its supply chain, some delays in sourcing materials needed for its products and some production disruption resulting from financing activitieshigher than typical employee absenteeism, all of $85.1 million.  Included in this amount are proceedswhich have increased the Company’s cost of approximately $17.0 million after deducting underwriting discountsrevenues and commissions and offering expenses payable by the Company, from the Company's equity offering completed on May 10, 2017, which includes the subsequent exercise by the underwriters of their option in full to purchase additional shares.decreased gross margin. The Company terminated its At Market Issuance Sales Agreement ("ATM") with FBR Capital Markets & Co. in conjunction with this equity offering. See Note 13 “Stockholder's Equity” for further discussion of these financing arrangements.

In December 2015, the Company entered into a set of strategic agreements valued at approximately $210.0 million with Inox Wind Ltd. (“Inox” or "Inox Wind"), which includes a multi-year supply contract pursuantextent to which the Companypandemic impacts the Company’s business, liquidity, results of operations and financial condition will supply electric control systems to Inoxdepend on future developments, which are highly uncertain and a license agreement allowing Inox to manufacture a limited number of electrical control systems. After Inox purchases the specified number of electrical control systems required under the terms of the supply contract, Inox agreed that the Company will continue as Inox’s preferred supplier and Inox willcannot be required to purchasepredicted with confidence.  Changes in macroeconomic conditions arising from the CompanyCOVID-19 pandemic or for other reasons, such as the ongoing war between Russia and Ukraine, inflation, rising interest rates, labor force availability, sourcing, material delays and global supply chain disruptions could have a majoritymaterial adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of its electric control systems requirements for an additional three-year period.



operation.

The Company believes that based on the information presented above and its quarterly management assessment, it has sufficient liquidity to fund its operations and capital expenditures for the next twelve months following the issuance of the financial statements for the ninesix months ended December 31, 2017.September 30, 2022. The Company’s liquidity is highly dependent on its ability to increase revenues, its ability to control its operating costs, and its ability to raise additional capital, if necessary. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and other sources of instability, including the war between Russia and Ukraine, on the global financing markets may reduce the Company's ability to raise additional capital, if necessary, which could negatively impact the Company's liquidity.  There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to continue to raise additional capital, on favorable terms or at all, from other sources or execute on any other means of improving liquidity described above.

8

2. Acquisitions

2021 Acquisition of Neeltran

On May 6, 2021, the Company entered into a Purchase and Sale Agreement (the "Real Property Purchase Agreement") and a Stock Purchase Agreement (the "Neeltran Stock Purchase Agreement") with the selling equity holders named therein. Also on May 6, 2021, pursuant to the terms of the Real Property Purchase Agreement, the Company's wholly-owned Connecticut limited liability company, AMSC Husky LLC ("AMSC Husky"), purchased the real property that serves as Neeltran's headquarters for $4.3 million, of which (a) $2.4 million was paid in immediately available funds by AMSC Husky to the owners of such real property, and (b) $1.9 million was paid directly to TD Bank as full payment for the outstanding indebtedness secured by the mortgage on such real property.

Pursuant to the terms of the Neeltran Stock Purchase Agreement, the Company purchased all of the issued and outstanding shares of capital stock of Neeltran, Inc., a Connecticut corporation ("Neeltran") and Neeltran International, Inc., a Connecticut corporation ("International") for $1.0 million in cash and 301,556 shares of the Company's common stock, $.01 par value per share ("AMSC Shares"), that were paid and issued, respectively, to the Neeltran selling stockholders. The Company also paid $1.1 million to International selling stockholders to pay off previous loans made by them to Neeltran.

Additionally, the Company paid approximately $7.6 million, including $1.9 million of indebtedness secured by the mortgage on the real property as described above, directly to Neeltran lenders at closing to extinguish outstanding Neeltran indebtedness to third parties. The total purchase price of $16.4 million includes cash paid, the fair value of the AMSC Shares issued at closing and the debt payoff on behalf of the sellers as follows (in millions):


Cash payment

 $4.4 

Issuance of 301,556 shares of Company's common stock

  4.4 

Debt payment to third party lenders on behalf of sellers

  7.6 

Total consideration

 $16.4 

The Neeltran Acquisition completed by the Company during the fiscal year ended March 31,2022 has been accounted for under the purchase method of accounting in accordance with ASC 805,Business Combinations. The Company allocated the purchase price to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at their estimated fair values as of the date of Neeltran Acquisition. The excess of the purchase price paid by the Company over the estimated fair value of net assets acquired has been recorded as goodwill. As Neeltran was previously a private company, the adoption of Accounting Standards Codification 842 ("ASC 842") was completed as part of the Neeltran Acquisition. See Note 15, "Leases" for further details. Neeltran had previously adopted Accounting Standards Codification 606,Revenue from Contracts with Customers ("ASC 606") as part of prior year audited financial statements.  

The following table summarizes the allocation of the purchase price based on the estimated fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in connection with the Neeltran Acquisition (in millions):

Cash and short-term investments

 $0.5 

Net working capital (excluding inventory and deferred revenue)

  (0.9)

Inventory

  9.0 

Property, plant and equipment

  6.5 

Deferred revenue

  (10.0)

Deferred tax liability

  (2.3)

Net tangible assets/(liabilities)

  2.8 
     

Backlog

  0.1 

Trade names and trademarks

  1.2 

Customer relationships

  3.5 

Net identifiable intangible assets/(liabilities)

  4.8 
     

Goodwill

  8.8 
     

Total purchase consideration

 $16.4 
2.
               Inventory include s a $0.6 million adjustment to step up the inventory balance to fair value consistent with the purchase price allocation. The fair value was based on the estimated selling price of the inventory, less the remaining manufacturing and selling cost and a normal profit margin on those manufacturing and selling efforts. The inventory step up adjustment increased cost of revenue by $0.6 million in the twelve month period ended March 31, 2022 as the inventory was sold. This increase is not reflected in the pro forma condensed combined statements of operations because it does not have a continuing impact beyond the first year.

Backlog of $0.1 million was evaluated using the multi period excess earnings method under the income approach. The contracts with customers do not provide for any guarantees to source all future requirements from the Company. The amortization method being utilized is economic consumption estimated over a two year period with the expense being allocated to cost of revenues.

 Customer relationships of $3.5 million relates to customers currently under contract and was determined based on a multi period excess earnings method under the income approach. The method of amortization being utilized is the economic consumption over 7 years with the expense being allocated to SG&A.

 Trade names and trademarks of $1.2 million were reviewed using the assumption that the Company would continue to utilize the Neeltran trade name indefinitely. The relief from royalty method was utilized using a 1% royalty rate on revenues with a 24.5% discount rate over 15 years.

9

The goodwill represents the value associated with the acquired workforce and expected synergies related to the business combinations of the two companies. Goodwill resulting from the Neeltran Acquisition was assigned to the Company's Grid business segment. Goodwill recognized in the Neeltran Acquisition is not deductible for tax purposes. The Company has finalized its purchase price allocation for the Neeltran Acquisition, and there were no changes to the net assets and goodwill recorded by the Company as of May 6, 2021. 

Unaudited Pro Forma Operating Results

The unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated statement of operations for the three and six months ended September 30, 2022 and  2021 is presented as if the Neeltran Acquisition had occurred on April 1, 2021.

  

Three Months Ended September 30,

  

Six Months Ended September 30,

 
  

2022

  

2021

  

2022

  

2021

 

Revenues

 $27,680  $27,908  $50,360  $56,158 

Operating loss

  (8,092)  (4,302)  (16,975)  (11,686)

Net loss

 $(9,881) $(4,434) $(18,605) $(12,127)
                 

Net loss per common share

                

Basic

 $(0.35) $(0.16) $(0.67) $(0.45)

Diluted

 $(0.35) $(0.16) $(0.67) $(0.45)

Shares - basic

  27,867   27,252   27,714   27,101 

Shares - diluted

  27,867   27,252   27,714   27,101 

The pro forma amounts include the historical operating results of the Company, and Neeltran, with appropriate adjustments that give effect to acquisition related costs, income taxes, intangible amortization resulting from the Neeltran Acquisition and certain conforming accounting policies of the Company. The pro forma amounts are not necessarily indicative of the operating results that would have occurred if the Neeltran Acquisition and related transactions had been completed at the beginning of the applicable periods presented. In addition, the pro forma amounts are not necessarily indicative of operating results in future periods.

Acquisition of NEPSI

On October 1, 2020 (the "NEPSI Acquisition Date"), the Company entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement (the "NEPSI Stock Purchase Agreement") with the selling stockholders named therein. Pursuant to the terms of the NEPSI Stock Purchase Agreement and concurrently with entering into such agreement, the Company acquired all of the issued and outstanding (i) shares of capital stock of Northeast Power Systems, Inc., a New York corporation ("NEPSI"), and (ii) membership interests of Northeast Power Realty, LLC, a New York limited liability company, which holds the real property that serves as NEPSI's headquarters (the "NEPSI Acquisition"). NEPSI is a U.S.-based global provider of medium-voltage metal-enclosed power capacitor banks and harmonic filter banks for use on electric power systems. Prior to the NEPSI Acquisition, the Company had purchased $0.4 million of products from NEPSI in fiscal year 2019 for which NEPSI was paid and had recorded revenue.

Pursuant to the NEPSI Stock Purchase Agreement, the Company acquired all of the issued and outstanding shares of NEPSI, and membership interest in the realty entity, for which the Company paid $26.0 million in cash and issued 873,657 restricted shares of the Company’s common stock. Additionally, the Company may issue to the selling stockholders up to an additional 1,000,000 shares of common stock upon NEPSI’s achievement of specified revenue objectives during varying periods of up to four years following closing of the NEPSI Acquisition. This contingent consideration is recorded as a derivative liability based on a Monte Carlo simulation to determine fair value at the time of issuance. NEPSI is now a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company and is operated and reported as a component of its Grid business unit.

The NEPSI Acquisition completed by the Company during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2021 has been accounted for under the purchase method of accounting in accordance with ASC 805,Business Combinations. The Company allocated the purchase price to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at their estimated fair values as of the date of NEPSI Acquisition. The excess of the purchase price paid by the Company over the estimated fair value of net assets acquired has been recorded as goodwill.  As NEPSI was previously a private company, the adoption of ASC 606 was completed as part of the NEPSI Acquisition.  See Note 3, "Revenue Recognition" for further details.  There were no leases acquired and the NEPSI Acquisition had no impact to the Company's reporting under ASC 842.

The total purchase price of approximately $42.4 million includes the fair value of shares of the Company’s common stock issued at closing, cash paid, and contingent consideration as follows (in millions):

Cash payment

 $26.0 

Issuance of 873,657 shares of Company’s common stock

  12.4 

Contingent consideration

  4.0 

Total consideration

 $42.4 

Total consideration consists of (a) cash of $26.0 million, (b) issuance of the Company's common stock, using $14.23 per share, which was the closing price on the day that the Company acquired NEPSI, and (c) $4.0 million of contingent consideration for the earnout liability valued as of the NEPSI Acquisition Date. NEPSI Acquisition costs of $0.3 million were recorded in selling, general and administrative ("SG&A") costs for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2021.

The fair value of the contingent consideration was determined using a Monte Carlo model and is accounted for as a derivative liability which is revalued at the fair value determined at each subsequent balance sheet date until the contingencies are resolved and the shares to be issued are determined, with the change in fair value recorded in the current period operating loss or (income).  See Note 13, "Contingent Consideration" for further details and a summary of key assumptions used to determine fair value in each period.

10

The following table summarizes the allocation of the purchase price based on the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed and related deferred income taxes in connection with the NEPSI Acquisition (in millions):

Net working capital (excluding inventory and deferred revenue)

 $0.1 

Inventory

  4.2 

Property, plant and equipment

  2.3 

Deferred revenue

  (2.7)

Deferred tax liability

  (1.7)

Net tangible assets/(liabilities)

  2.2 
     

Backlog

  0.6 

Trade names and trademarks

  0.6 

Customer relationships

  6.1 

Net identifiable intangible assets/(liabilities)

  7.3 
     

Goodwill

  32.9 
     

Total purchase consideration

 $42.4 

Inventory includes a $1.0 million adjustment to step up the inventory balance to fair value consistent with the purchase price allocation.  The fair value was determined based on the estimated selling price of the inventory, less the remaining manufacturing and selling cost and a normal profit margin on those manufacturing and selling efforts. The $1.0 million step up adjustment increased cost of revenue in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2021 as the inventory was sold.  This increase is not reflected in the pro forma condensed combined statements of operations because it does not have a continuing impact beyond the first year.

Backlog of $0.6 million was evaluated using the multi period excess earnings method under the income approach. The contracts with customers do not provide for any guarantees to source all future requirements from the Company. The amortization method being utilized is economic consumption estimated over a two year period with the expense being allocated to cost of revenues.

Customer relationships of $6.1 million relates to customers currently under contract and was determined based on a multi period excess earnings method under the income approach. The method of amortization being utilized is the economic consumption over 7 years with the expense being allocated to SG&A.

Trade names and trademarks of $0.6 million were reviewed, using the assumption that the Company would continue to utilize the NEPSI trade name indefinitely. The relief from royalty method was utilized using an 8% royalty rate on revenues with a 13% discount rate over 8 years. 

Goodwill represents the value associated with the acquired workforce and expected synergies related to the business combination of the two companies. Goodwill resulting from the NEPSI Acquisition was assigned to the Company’s Grid business segment.  Goodwill recognized in the NEPSI Acquisition is not deductible for tax purposes. The $1.7 million of deferred tax liability is primarily related to inventory step up and intangibles. 

11

3. Revenue Recognition

The Company’s revenues in its Grid business segment are derived primarily through enabling the transmission and distribution of power, providing planning services that allow it to identify power grid needs and risks, and developing ship protection systems for the U.S. Navy. The Company’s revenues in its Wind business segment are derived primarily through supplying advanced power electronics and control systems, licensing its highly engineered wind turbine designs, and providing extensive customer support services to wind turbine manufacturers. The Company records revenue based on a five-step model in accordance with ASC 606. For its customer contracts, the Company identifies the performance obligations, determines the transaction price, allocates the contract transaction price to the performance obligations, and recognizes the revenue when (or as) control of goods or services is transferred to the customer. In the three and six months ended September 30, 2022, 83% and 77% of revenue, respectively, was recognized at the point in time when control transferred to the customer, with the remainder being recognized over time. In the three and six months ended September 30, 2021, 86% and 82% of revenue, respectively, was recognized at the point in time when control transferred to the customer, with the remainder being recognized over time.

In the Company's equipment and system product line, each contract with a customer summarizes each product sold to a customer, which typically represents distinct performance obligations. A contract's transaction price is allocated to each distinct performance obligation using the respective standalone selling price which is determined primarily using the cost-plus expected margin approach and recognized as revenue when, or as, the performance obligation is satisfied. The majority of the Company’s product sales transfer control to the customer in line with the contracted delivery terms and revenue is recorded at the point in time when title and risk transfer to the customer, which is primarily upon delivery, as the Company has determined that this is the point in time that control transfers to the customer.

The Company's equipment and system product line includes certain contracts which do not meet the requirements of an exchange transaction and therefore do not fall within the scope of ASC 606.  As these non-exchange transaction contracts are considered grant revenue and do not fall within any specific accounting literature, the Company follows guidance within ASC 606 by analogy to recognize grant revenue over time. The Company recorded no grant revenue in each of the three and six months ended September 30, 2022. In the three and six months ended September 30, 2021, the Company recorded $0.3 million and $0.8 million in grant revenue, respectively, which is included in the Company’s Grid business segment revenue.

In the Company's service and technology development product line, there are several different types of transactions and each begins with a contract with a customer that summarizes each product sold to a customer, which typically represent distinct performance obligations. The technology development transactions are primarily for activities that have no alternative use and for which a profit can be expected throughout the life of the contract. In these cases, the revenue is recognized over time, but in the instances where a reasonable profit margin cannot be assured throughout the entire contract, the revenue is recognized at a point in time. Each contract's transaction price is allocated to each distinct performance obligation using the respective standalone selling price which is determined primarily using the cost-plus expected margin approach. The ongoing service transactions are for service contracts that provide benefit to the customer simultaneously as the Company performs its obligations, and therefore this revenue is recognized ratably over time throughout the effective period of these contracts. The transaction prices on these contracts are allocated based on an adjusted market approach which is reassessed annually for reasonableness. The field service transactions include contracts for delivery of goods and completion of services made at the customer's requests, which are not deemed satisfied until the work has been completed and/or the requested goods have been delivered, so all of this revenue is recognized at the point in time when the control changes, and at allocated prices based on the adjusted market approach driven by standard price lists. The royalty transactions are related to certain contract terms on transactions in the Company's equipment and systems product line based on activity as specified in the contracts. The transaction prices of these agreements are calculated based on an adjusted market approach as specified in the contract. The Company reports royalty revenue for usage-based royalties when the sales have occurred. In circumstances when collectability is not assured and a contract does not exist under ASC 606, revenue is deferred until a non-refundable payment has been received for substantially all the amount that is due and there are no further remaining performance obligations.

The Company's service contracts can include a purchase order from a customer for specific goods in which each item is a distinct performance obligation satisfied at a point in time at which control of the goods is transferred to the customer.  This transfer occurs based on the contracted delivery terms or when the requested service work has been completed. The transaction price for these goods is allocated based on the adjusted market approach considering similar transactions under similar circumstances. Service contracts are also derived from ongoing maintenance contracts and extended service-type warranty contracts. In these transactions, the Company is contracted to provide an ongoing service over a specified period of time. As the customer is consuming the benefits as the service is being provided, the revenue is recognized over time ratably.

The Company’s policy is not to accept volume discounts, product returns, or rebates and allowances within its contracts. In the event a contract was approved with any of these terms, it would be evaluated for variable consideration, estimated and recorded as a reduction of revenue in the same period the related product revenue was recorded.

The Company provides assurance-type warranties on all product sales for a term of typically one to three years, and extended service-type warranties at the customer's option for an additional term ranging up to four additional years. The Company accrues for the estimated warranty costs for assurance warranties at the time of sale based on historical warranty experience plus any known or expected changes in warranty exposure. For all extended service-type warranties, the Company recognizes the revenue ratably over time during the effective period of the services.

The Company records revenue net of sales tax, value added tax, excise tax and other taxes collected concurrent with revenue-producing activities. The Company has elected to recognize the cost for freight and shipping when control over the products sold passes to customers and revenue is recognized. The Company has elected to recognize incremental costs of obtaining a contract as expense when incurred except in contracts where the amortization period would exceed twelve months; in such cases the long-term amount will be assessed for materiality. The Company has elected not to adjust the promised amount of consideration for the effects of a significant financing component if the period of financing is twelve months or less.

The Company’s contracts with customers do not typically include extended payment terms and may include milestone billing over the life of the contract. Payment terms vary by contract type and type of customer and generally range from 30 to 60 days from delivery.  

12

The following tables disaggregate the Company’s revenue by product line and by shipment destination (in thousands):

  

Three Months Ended September 30, 2022

  

Six Months Ended September 30, 2022

 

Product Line:

 

Grid

  

Wind

  

Grid

  

Wind

 

Equipment and systems

 $24,128  $1,330  $42,204  $3,302 

Services and technology development

  1,570   652   3,323   1,531 

Total

 $25,698  $1,982  $45,527  $4,833 
                 

Region:

                

Americas

 $18,021   -  $34,923  $- 

Asia Pacific

  6,178   1,912   8,855   4,763 

EMEA

  1,499   70   1,749   70 

Total

 $25,698  $1,982  $45,527  $4,833 

  

Three Months Ended September 30, 2021

  

Six Months Ended September 30, 2021

 

Product Line:

 

Grid

  

Wind

  

Grid

  

Wind

 

Equipment and systems

 $23,031  $1,826  $44,189  $2,860 

Services and technology development

  1,588   1,463   3,930   2,349 

Total

 $24,619  $3,289  $48,119  $5,209 
                 

Region:

                

Americas

 $18,115  $59  $40,760  $78 

Asia Pacific

  3,269   3,220   3,867   5,091 

EMEA

  3,235   10   3,492   40 

Total

 $24,619  $3,289  $48,119  $5,209 

As of September 30, 2022, and 2021, the Company’s contract assets and liabilities primarily relate to the timing differences between cash received from a customer in connection with contractual rights to invoicing and the timing of revenue recognition following completion of performance obligations. The Company's accounts receivable balance is made up entirely of customer contract related balances. Changes in the Company’s contract assets, which are included in “Unbilled accounts receivable” and “Deferred program costs” (see Note 8, “Accounts Receivable” and Note 9, “Inventory” for a reconciliation to the condensed consolidated balance sheets) and "Contract liabilities", which are included in the current portion and long-term portion of "Deferred revenue" in the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheets, are as follows (in thousands):

  Unbilled Accounts Receivable  Deferred Program Costs  Contract Liabilities 

Beginning balance as of March 31, 2022

 $6,492  $858  $30,034 

Increases for costs incurred to fulfill performance obligations

      782     

Increase (decrease) due to customer billings

  (7,322)      33,141 

Decrease due to cost recognition on completed performance obligations

      (697)    

Increase (decrease) due to recognition of revenue based on transfer of control of performance obligations

  7,342       (26,857)

Other changes and FX impact

      (47)  (863)

Ending balance as of September 30, 2022

 $6,512  $896  $35,454 

  Unbilled Accounts Receivable  Deferred Program Costs  Contract Liabilities 

Beginning balance as of March 31, 2021

 $5,765  $977  $21,257 

Increases for costs incurred to fulfill performance obligations

     2,277    

Increase for balance acquired

     634   10,048 

Increase (decrease) due to customer billings

  (4,807)     34,344 

Decrease due to cost recognition on completed performance obligations

     (3,055)   

Increase (decrease) due to recognition of revenue based on transfer of control of performance obligations

  7,838      (34,169)

Other changes and FX impact

     (3)  38 

Ending balance as of September 30, 2021

 $8,796  $830  $31,518 

13

The Company’s remaining performance obligations represent the unrecognized revenue value of the Company’s contractual commitments. The Company’s performance obligations may vary significantly each reporting period based on the timing of major new contractual commitments. As of September 30, 2022, the Company had outstanding performance obligations on existing contracts under ASC 606 to be recognized in the next twelve months of approximately $101.0 million. There are also approximately $18.1 million of outstanding performance obligations to be recognized over a period of thirteen to sixty months. The remaining performance obligations are subject to customer actions and therefore the timing of revenue recognition cannot be reasonably estimated. The twelve-month performance obligations include anticipated shipments to Inox based on the twelve-month rolling forecast provided by Inox on the multi-year supply contract. The quantities specified in any forecast provided by Inox related to the multi-year supply contract are firm and irrevocable for the firstthree months of a twelve-month rolling forecast. The timing of the performance obligations beyond the twelve-month forecast provided by Inox are not determinable and therefore are not included in the total remaining performance obligations. 

The following table sets forth customers who represented 10% or more of the Company’s total revenues for the three and six months ended September 30, 2022 and 2021:

   

Three Months Ended

  

Six Months Ended

 
 

Reportable

 

September 30,

  

September 30,

 
 

Segment

 

2022

  

2021

  

2022

  

2021

 

Inox Wind Limited

Wind

 

<10%

   10% 

<10%

  

<10%

 

Fuji Bridex Pte Ltd

Grid

  17% 

<10%

   13% 

<10%

 

Tri-State Generation and Transmission Association, Inc.

Grid

 

<10%

   12% 

<10%

  

<10%

 

Micron Technology

Grid

 

<10%

  

<10%

  

<10%

   10%

Ascend Performance Materials Ops LLC

Grid

  12% 

<10%

  

<10%

  

<10%

 

4. Stock-Based Compensation

The Company accounts for its stock-based compensation at fair value. The following table summarizes stock-based compensation expense by financial statement line item for the three and ninesix months ended December 31, 2017September 30, 2022 and 20162021 (in thousands):

 Three months ended December 31, Nine months ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2017 2016
Cost of revenues$39
 $40
 $98
 $139
Research and development184
 61
 294
 153
Selling, general and administrative660
 512
 1,723
 1,974
Total$883
 $613
 $2,115
 $2,266

  

Three Months Ended September 30,

  

Six Months Ended September 30,

 
  

2022

  

2021

  

2022

  

2021

 

Cost of revenues

 $78  $21  $107  $112 

Research and development

  177   192   356   439 

Selling, general and administrative

  764   888   1,590   1,842 

Total

 $1,019  $1,101  $2,052  $2,393 

The Company issued 37,140 shares of immediately vested common stock and 800,500338,500 shares of restricted stock awards during the ninethree and six months ended December 31, 2017, September 30, 2022, and 25,806 shares of immediately vested common stock during the six months ended September 30, 2022. The Company issued 35,00047,604 shares of immediately vested common stock, all of which were issued in lieu of cash bonuses, during the three months ended September 30, 2021, and granted 126,000166,648 shares of immediately vested common stock, of which 158,356 shares were issued in-lieu of cash bonuses, and 309,700 shares of restricted stock awards during the ninesix months ended December 31, 2016.  September 30, 2021. These restricted stock awards generally vest over 2-3 years.  Awards for restricted stock include both time-based and performance-based awards.  For options and restricted stock awards that vest upon the passage of time, expense is being recorded over the vesting period.  Performance-based awards are expensed over the requisite service period based on probability of achievement. In addition, the Company issued 16,667 restricted stock units under the 2007 Stock Incentive Plan during the nine months ended December 31, 2017, each of which represents the right to receive one share of common stock in connection with a severance agreement entered into with one of the Company's former executive officers. These restricted stock units vested and were settled in shares of common stock on the eighth day after receipt of an irrevocable release.

The estimated fair value of the Company’s stock-based awards, less expected annual forfeitures, is amortized over the awards’ service period. The total unrecognized compensation cost for unvested outstanding stock options was $0.3less than $0.1 million at December 31, 2017. during the six months ended September 30, 2022. This expense will be recognized over a weighted average expense period of approximately 1.21.7 years. The total unrecognized compensation cost for unvested outstanding restricted stock was $2.8$5.2 million at December 31, 2017. September 30, 2022. This expense will be recognized over a weighted-average expense period of approximately 2.01.6 years.

The Company granted 20,564 stock options during the six months ended September 30, 2022. The Company did not grant any stock options during the three and nine months ended December 31, 2017. DuringSeptember 30, 2022 or the ninethree and six months ended December 31, 2016,September 30, 2021. The stock options granted during the Company granted 9,703 stock options. These options six months ended September 30, 2022 will vest over 2 years. The weighted average assumptions used in the Black Scholes valuation model for stock options granted during the ninesix months ended December 31, 2016 September 30, 2022 are as follows:

Three Months Ended September 30,

Six Months Ended September 30,

 December 31,
2017

2022

 December 31,
2016
Expected volatilityN/A

2021

 67.6

2022

2021

Expected volatility

N/AN/A71.40%N/A

Risk-free interest rate

N/A

 1.3N/AN/A3.10%N/A

Expected life (years)

N/A

 5.7
Dividend yieldN/A None
N/A6.14N/A

Dividend yield

N/AN/ANoneN/A


3.

5. Computation of Net Loss per Common Share

Basic net loss per share (“EPS”) is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Where applicable, diluted EPS is computed by dividing the net loss by the weighted-average number of common shares and dilutive common equivalent shares outstanding during the period, calculated using the treasury stock method. Common equivalent shares include the effect of restricted stock, exercise of stock options and warrants and contingently



issuable shares. Stock options and warrants that are out-of-the-money with exercise prices greater than the average market price of the underlying common shares and shares of performance-based restricted stock where the contingency was not met are excluded from the computation of diluted EPS as the effect of their inclusion would be anti-dilutive.  For each of the three and ninesix months ended December 31, 2017, 1.2September 30, 2022, and 2021, 1.1 million shares were not included in the calculation of diluted EPS as they were considered anti-dilutive, ofEPS. Of these, 1.0 million relate to shares tied to the derivative liability for which 0.3the contingency has not yet been met, and 0.1 million relate to outstanding stock options and 0.9 million relate to outstanding warrants. For the three and nine months ended December 31, 2016, 1.6 million shares were not included in the calculation of diluted EPS as they were considered anti-dilutive of which 0.4 million relate to outstanding stock options, and 1.2 million relate to outstanding warrants.
.

The following table reconciles the numerators and denominators of the earnings per share calculation for the three and ninesix months ended December 31, 2017September 30, 2022 and 20162021 (in thousands, except per share data):

  

Three Months Ended September 30,

  

Six Months Ended September 30,

 
  

2022

  

2021

  

2022

  

2021

 

Numerator:

                

Net loss

 $(9,881) $(4,434) $(18,590) $(9,837)

Denominator:

                

Weighted-average shares of common stock outstanding

  28,775   28,360   28,648   28,141 

Weighted-average shares subject to repurchase

  (908)  (1,108)  (934)  (1,101)

Shares used in per-share calculation ― basic

  27,867   27,252   27,714   27,040 

Shares used in per-share calculation ― diluted

  27,867   27,252   27,714   27,040 

Net loss per share ― basic

 $(0.35) $(0.16) $(0.67) $(0.36)

Net loss per share ― diluted

 $(0.35) $(0.16) $(0.67) $(0.36)

14

 Three months ended December 31, Nine months ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2017 2016
Numerator:       
     Net loss$(4,248) $(2,768) $(26,782) $(20,448)
Denominator:       
Weighted-average shares of common stock outstanding20,889
 14,203
 19,189
 14,175
Weighted-average shares subject to repurchase(940) (411) (575) (429)
Shares used in per-share calculation ― basic19,949
 13,792
 18,614
 13,746
Shares used in per-share calculation ― diluted19,949
 13,792
 18,614
 13,746
Net loss per share ― basic$(0.21) $(0.20) $(1.44) $(1.49)
Net loss per share ― diluted$(0.21) $(0.20) $(1.44) $(1.49)

4. Acquisition

6. Goodwill and Related Other Intangibles

Goodwill


Acquisition of Infinia Technology Corporation
On September 25, 2017, the Company acquired Infinia Technology Corporation ("ITC") for approximately $3.8 million as described below (the "Acquisition"). Located in Richmond, Washington, ITC is a technology firm founded in 2009 specializing in the design, development and commercialization of cryo-coolers for a wide range of applications.
Pursuant to the terms of the stock purchase agreement ("SPA"), the Company acquired all of the issued and outstanding shares of ITC (the "ITC Shares") from the selling stockholders, for a purchase price of approximately $3.8 million consisting of $0.1 million in cash and 884,890 shares of the Company’s common stock (the "AMSC Shares"), $0.01 par value per share at a per share price of $4.02 on the acquisition date. Under the terms of the SPA, the Company was obligated to file a registration statement (the "Resale Registration Statement") covering the resale of the AMSC Shares by the selling stockholders no later than 10 business days following the closing of the Acquisition, and to use commercially reasonable efforts to cause the Resale Registration Statement to be declared effective by the SEC as soon as practicable thereafter. Additionally, the Company agreed to pay the selling stockholders in cash (the "Make Whole Payment"), if any, equal to (x) an amount equal to (i) the price per AMSC Share pursuant to the terms of the SPA, multiplied by (ii) the number of AMSC Shares sold by the selling stockholders during the first 90 days after the effectiveness of the Resale Registration Statement, minus (y) the aggregate sales proceeds received by the Selling Stockholders from the sale of any AMSC Shares during the first 90 days after the effectiveness of the Resale Registration Statement. The Resale Registration Statement was declared effective on October 23, 2017. The contingent liability related to the Make Whole Payment was determined under a fair value option based pricing model to be $0.6 million on September 25, 2017 and was subsequently reassessed at each period end until the final amount due of $0.7 million as of December 31, 2017 was determined according to the agreed upon formula. See Note 5 "Fair Value Measurements" and Note 12 "Warrants and Derivative Liabilities" for further discussion regarding the valuation of this liability. On January 5, 2018, the Company settled the Make Whole Payment to the selling stockholders in the amount of $0.7 million.
ITC was integrated into the Company's Grid business unit. The Acquisition has been accounted for under the purchase method of accounting in accordance with ASU 805, Business Combinations. The Company allocated the purchase price to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at their estimated fair values as of the date of Acquisition. The Company estimated the fair value of the intangible assets at $3.4 million, which consisted of core-technology and know-how, working capital of $0.2 million and property, plant and equipment of less than $0.1 million. A long-term deferred tax liability of $1.1 million was recorded for the differing book and tax basis of the ITC assets and liabilities. Provisional amounts have been recorded for the related tax activity as of December 31, 2017. Final adjustments are expected to be made during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017.


The following table summarizes the consideration paid for ITC and the amounts of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed recognized at the acquisition date, as well as the fair value at the acquisition date (in millions):
 September 25, 2017
Consideration 
    Cash$0.1
    Equity (884,890 shares of common stock at $4.02 per share)3.6
    Contingent consideration0.6
Total Consideration$4.3
  
Recognized amounts of identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed 
     Core technology and know-how$3.4
     Working capital0.2
     Property, plant and equipment0.0
Total identifiable net assets$3.6
Long-term deferred tax liability1.1
Goodwill allocated$1.7
At the Acquisition date, the Company valued the Acquisition at $4.2 million (excluding Acquisition costs), using a value of $4.02 per share, which was the closing price of the Company's common stock on the date of Acquisition plus $0.1 million in cash and including $0.6 million of contingent consideration for the Make Whole Payment valued as of the closing date. Acquisition costs of less than $0.1 million were recorded in selling, general and administrative costs.
The results of ITC's operations, which were not significant from the date of acquisition until December 31, 2017, are included in the Company’s consolidated results from the date of Acquisition of September 25, 2017, for the three and nine months ended December 31, 2017. Assuming the Acquisition had occurred on April 1, 2017 and 2016, the impact on the consolidated results of the Company would not have been significant.

Goodwill
At the time of the Acquisition, the Company allocated the purchase price to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at their estimated fair values as of the date of Acquisition. The excess of the purchase price paid by the Company over the estimated fair value of net assets acquired of $1.7 million has been recorded as goodwill in the Company's Grid segment. Goodwill represents the value associated with the acquired workforce and synergies related to the merger of the two companies.
The guidance under ASC 805-30 provides for the recognition of goodwill on the Acquisition date measured as the excess of the aggregate consideration transferred over the net of the Acquisition date amounts of net assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The fair value of the contingent consideration included in the total consideration transferred was determined using the Black Scholes pricing model, and all other consideration transferred was calculated using its observable market fair value. The tangible net assets acquired fair value was based on observable market fair value. The acquired intangible asset fair value was determined using discounted cash flows under an excess in earnings model.

Goodwill represents the difference between the purchase price and the fair value of the identifiable tangible and intangible net assets when accounted for using the purchase method of accounting. The Company's goodwill balance relates to the Neeltran Acquisition in fiscal 2021, the NEPSI Acquisition in fiscal 2020, and the acquisition of Infinia Technology Corporation in fiscal 2017 and is reported in the Grid business segment. Goodwill is not amortized but reviewed for impairment. Goodwill is reviewed annually and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the goodwill might not be recoverable.

The Company early adopted ASU 2017-04 asfollowing table provides a roll forward of September 30, 2017. The Company will perform an annual impairment assessment on goodwill, unless events occurthe changes in the interim periods to indicate impairment may have occurred. Company's Grid business segment goodwill balance:

  

Goodwill

 

March 31, 2021

 $34,634 

Neeltran Acquisition

  8,837 

March 31, 2022

 $43,471 

Less impairment loss

  - 

September 30, 2022

 $43,471 

The Company did not identify any triggering events in the period between the date of Acquisitionthree and December 31, 2017, whichsix months ended September 30, 2022 that would require subsequent interim impairment testing of goodwill. As such,

Other Intangibles

Intangible assets at September 30, 2022 and March 31, 2022 consisted of the following (in thousands):

  

September 30, 2022

  

March 31, 2022

     
  

Gross Amount

  

Accumulated Amortization

  

Net Book Value

  

Gross Amount

  

Accumulated Amortization

  

Net Book Value

  

Estimated Useful Life

 

Licenses

 $3,610  $(3,610)    $3,610  $(3,610)     7 

Backlog

 $681  $(668) $13  $681  $(631) $50   2 

Trade name and trademarks

  1,800      1,800   1,800      1,800  

Indefinite

 

Customer relationships

  9,600   (3,845)  5,755   9,600   (2,723)  6,877   7 

Core technology and know-how

  5,970   (3,627)  2,343   5,970   (3,386)  2,584   5-10 

Intangible assets

 $21,661  $(11,750) $9,911  $21,661  $(10,350) $11,311     

The Company recorded intangible amortization expense related to customer relationship and core technology and know-how of $0.7 million and $1.4 million, in the three and six months ended September 30, 2022, respectively, and $0.6 million and $1.2 million in the three and six months ended September 30, 2021, respectively. Additionally, the Company expectsrecorded no intangible amortization related to perform its annual goodwill impairment test duringbacklog in the fourth quarterthree months ended September 30, 2022 and the Company recorded less than $0.1 million related to backlog that is reported in cost of fiscal 2017. revenues in the six months ended September 30, 2022. The Company will comparerecorded intangible amortization related to backlog that is reported in cost of revenues of less than $0.1 million and $0.1 million in the fair value of its reporting unitthree and six months ended September 30, 2021, respectively.

Expected future amortization expense related to its carrying value. If the carrying value of the netintangible assets assignedis as follows (in thousands):

Years ended March 31,

 

Total

 

2023

  1,384 

2024

  2,158 

2025

  1,648 

2026

  1,221 

2027

  1,085 

Thereafter

  615 

Total

 $8,111 

The Company's intangible assets relate entirely to the reporting unit exceedsGrid business segment operations in the fair value of the reporting unit, then the Company would record an impairment loss equal to the difference.United States.




5.

7. Fair Value Measurements

A valuation hierarchy for disclosure of the inputs to valuation used to measure fair value has been established. This hierarchy prioritizes the inputs into three broad levels as follows:

Level 1

-

Level 1 -

Inputs are unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access at the measurement date.

Level 2

Level 2 

-

-

Inputs include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means (market corroborated inputs).

Level 3

Level 3 

-

-

Unobservable inputs that reflect the Company’s assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. The Company develops these inputs based on the best information available, including its own data.

The Company provides a gross presentation of activity within Level 3 measurement roll-forward and details of transfers in and out of Level 1 and 2 measurements.  A change in the hierarchy of an investment from its current level is reflected in the period during which the pricing methodology of such investment changes.  Disclosure of the transfer of securities from Level 1 to Level 2 or Level 3 is made in the event that the related security is significant to total cash and investments.  The Company did not have any transfers of assets and liabilities from Level 1, but did transfer $0.7 million related to the contingent liability from Level 3 to2 or Level 23 of the fair value measurement hierarchy during the three and ninesix months ended December 31, 2017. The fair value calculation at December 31, 2017 was based on actual observable stock price inputs following the sale of all of the related shares, in place of the Company's assumptions which had been used in the prior period.September 30, 2022.

15

A financial asset’s or liability’s classification within the hierarchy is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

Valuation Techniques

Cash Equivalents

Cash equivalents consist of highly liquid instruments with maturities of three months or less that are regarded as high quality, low risk investments, are measured using such inputs as quoted prices and are classified within Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy. Cash equivalents consist principally of certificates of deposits and money market accounts.

Marketable Securities

Marketable securities consist of certificates of deposit that are measured using such inputs as quoted prices and are classified within Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy. The Company determines the appropriate classification of its marketable securities at the time of purchase and re-evaluates such classification as of each balance sheet date.  All marketable securities are considered available for sale and are carried at fair value. Changes in fair value are recorded to other income (expense), net.  The Company had no outstanding marketable securities as of September 30, 2022 and the Company recognized no change in the three and six months ended September 30, 2022. The Company recognized $0.1 million in unrealized losses on marketable securities, which is recorded in other income (expense), net, for the three and six months ended September 30, 2021. The Company periodically reviews the realizability of each short and long term marketable security when impairment indicators exist with respect to the security. If other than temporary impairment of value of the security exists, the carrying value of the security is written down to its estimated fair value.

Contingent Consideration

Contingent consideration relates to the earnout payment set forth in the NEPSI Stock Purchase Agreement that provides that the selling stockholders may receive up to an additional 1,000,000 shares of common stock of the Company upon the achievement of certain specified revenue objectives over varying periods of up to four years following the NEPSI Acquisition Date. See Note 13, "Contingent Consideration" and Note 2, “Acquisitions” for further discussion. The Company relied on a Monte Carlo method to determine the fair value of the contingent consideration on the NEPSI Acquisition Date and will continue to revalue the fair value of the contingent consideration using the same method at each subsequent balance sheet date until the contingencies are resolved and the shares to be issued are determined, with the change in fair value recorded in the current period operating loss.

The following table provides the assets and liabilities carried at fair value on a recurring basis, measured as of December 31, 2017September 30, 2022 and March 31, 20172022 (in thousands):

  

Total Carrying Value

  

Quoted Prices in Active Markets (Level 1)

  

Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)

  

Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)

 

September 30, 2022:

                

Assets:

                

Cash equivalents

 $9,894  $9,894  $  $ 

Derivative liabilities:

                

Contingent consideration

 $1,080  $  $  $1,080 

  Total Carrying Value  Quoted Prices in Active Markets (Level 1)  Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)  Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) 

March 31, 2022:

                

Assets:

                

Cash equivalents

 $17,641  $17,641  $  $ 

Derivative liabilities:

                

Contingent consideration

 $1,200  $  $  $1,200 

16
 
Total
Carrying
Value
 
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
(Level 1)
 
Significant Other
Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Significant
Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
December 31, 2017:       
Assets:       
Cash equivalents$17,944
 $17,944
 $
 $
Derivative liabilities:       
Acquisition contingent consideration$687
 $
 $687
 $
Warrants455
 
 
 455
Total derivative liabilities$1,142
 $
 $687
 $455

 Total
Carrying
Value
 Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
(Level 1)
 Significant Other
Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
 Significant
Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
March 31, 2017:       
Assets:       
Cash equivalents$14,105
 $14,105
 $
 $
Derivative liabilities:       
Warrants$1,923
 $
 $
 $1,923

The table below reflects the activity for the Company’s major classes of liabilitiesderivative liability measured at fair value on a recurring basis (in thousands):

  

Acquisition Contingent Consideration

 

Balance at March 31, 2021

 $7,050 

Change in fair value

  (5,850)

Balance at March 31, 2022

  1,200 

Change in fair value

  (120)

Balance at September 30, 2022

 $1,080 



 Warrants Acquisition Contingent Consideration
April 1, 2017$1,923
 $
Issuance of contingent consideration
 571
Mark to market adjustment(1,468) 71
Settlement fees
 45
Balance at December 31, 2017$455
 $687
 Warrants
April 1, 2016$3,227
Mark to market adjustment(1,304)
Balance at March 31, 2017$1,923

Valuation Techniques
Cash Equivalents
Cash equivalents consist of highly liquid instruments with maturities of three months or less that are regarded as high quality, low risk investments and are measured using such inputs as quoted prices, and are classified within Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy. Cash equivalents consist principally of certificates of deposits and money market accounts.
Warrants
Warrants were issued in conjunction with a Securities Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with Capital Ventures International (“CVI”) in April 2012, an equity offering to Hudson Bay Capital in November 2014, and a Loan and Security Agreement with Hercules Technology Growth Capital, Inc. (“Hercules”) in June 2012 and through subsequent amendments. See Note 11, “Debt,” and Note 12 “Warrants and Derivative Liabilities,” for additional information. These warrants are subject to revaluation at each balance sheet date, and any change in fair value will be recorded as a change in fair value in derivatives and warrants until the earlier of their exercise or expiration.
The Company relies on various assumptions in a lattice model to determine the fair value of warrants. The Company has valued the warrants within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy. See Note 12, “Warrants and Derivative Liabilities,” for a discussion of the warrants and the valuation assumptions used.
Contingent Consideration
Contingent consideration relates to the Make Whole Provision set forth in the SPA that requires the Company to guarantee the purchase price of the acquisition should the aggregate proceeds of the resale of AMSC Shares sold by selling stockholders during the first 90 days after the effectiveness of the Resale Registration Statement be less than the agreed upon purchase price for such AMSC Shares (per the terms of the SPA) sold during such 90 day period. See Note 12, "Warrants and Derivative Liabilities" and Note 4, “Acquisition and Related Goodwill” for further discussion. The Company relied on a Black Scholes option pricing method to determine the fair value of the contingent consideration on the date of acquisition and continued to revalue the fair value of the contingent consideration at each subsequent balance sheet date until the final settlement date, with the change in fair value recorded in the current period operating loss. This liability was settled on January 5, 2018.

6.

8. Accounts Receivable

Accounts receivable at December 31, 2017September 30, 2022 and March 31, 20172022 consisted of the following (in thousands):

  

September 30, 2022

  

March 31, 2022

 

Accounts receivable (billed)

 $13,879  $13,788 

Accounts receivable (unbilled)

  6,512   6,492 

Accounts receivable, net

 $20,391  $20,280 

 December 31,
2017
 March 31,
2017
Accounts receivable (billed)$10,379
 $7,436
Accounts receivable (unbilled)1,727
 574
Less: Allowance for doubtful accounts(54) (54)
Accounts receivable, net$12,052
 $7,956

7.

9. Inventory



Inventory, net of reserves, at December 31, 2017September 30, 2022 and March 31, 20172022 consisted of the following (in thousands):

 December 31,
2017
 March 31,
2017
Raw materials$5,544
 $4,263
Work-in-process1,626
 426
Finished goods7,931
 8,016
Deferred program costs2,028
 4,757
Net inventory$17,129
 $17,462

  

September 30, 2022

  

March 31, 2022

 

Raw materials

 $17,601  $11,020 

Work-in-process

  14,591   10,462 

Finished goods

  3,254   1,326 

Deferred program costs

  896   858 

Net inventory

 $36,342  $23,666 

The Company recorded inventory write-downs of $0.1$0.7 million and $0.4$0.6 million for the three and nine months ended December 31, 2017.September 30, 2022 and 2021, respectively. The Company recorded inventory write-downs of $0.4$1.0 million and $1.1$1.2 million for the three and ninesix months ended December 31, 2016.  September 30, 2022 and 2021, respectively. These write downswrite-downs were based on evaluatingthe Company's evaluation of its inventory on hand for excess quantities and obsolescence.

Deferred program costs as of December 31, 2017September 30, 2022 and March 31, 20172022, primarily represent costs incurred on programs accounted for under contract accounting where the Company needs to complete development milestonesperformance obligations before the related revenue and costs will be recognized.

17


8.

10. Property, Plant and Equipment

The cost and accumulated depreciation of property, plant and equipment at December 31, 2017September 30, 2022 and March 31, 20172022 are as follows (in thousands):

 December 31,
2017
 March 31,
2017
Land$3,643
 $3,643
Construction in progress - equipment2,160
 601
Buildings34,549
 34,549
Equipment and software72,566
 73,445
Furniture and fixtures1,048
 1,201
Leasehold improvements498
 2,442
Property, plant and equipment, gross114,464
 115,881
Less accumulated depreciation(77,780) (72,443)
Property, plant and equipment, net$36,684
 $43,438

  

September 30, 2022

  

March 31, 2022

 

Construction in progress - equipment

 $568  $573 

Land

  980   980 

Building

  5,397   5,270 

Equipment and software

  43,652   43,668 

Finance lease - right of use asset

  4   8 

Furniture and fixtures

  1,521   1,379 

Leasehold improvements

  6,642   6,634 

Property, plant and equipment, gross

  58,764   58,512 

Less accumulated depreciation

  (45,966)  (44,856)

Property, plant and equipment, net

 $12,798  $13,656 

Depreciation expense was $0.7 million for each of the three months ended September 30, 2022 and 2021, respectively. Depreciation expense was $1.4 million and $8.9$1.3 million for the three and ninesix months ended December 31, 2017. Depreciation expense was $1.7 million September 30, 2022 and $5.2 million for the three and nine months ended December 31, 2016. Included in depreciation expense for the nine months ended December 31, 2017 is $4.1 million of accelerated depreciation recorded to cost of revenues related to revised estimates of the remaining useful lives of certain pieces of manufacturing equipment. Construction in progress - equipment primarily includes capital investments in the Company's newly leased facility in Ayer, Massachusetts.2021, respectively.


9.

11. Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses

Accounts payable and accrued expenses at December 31, 2017September 30, 2022 and March 31, 20172022 consisted of the following (in thousands):



 December 31,
2017
 March 31,
2017
Accounts payable$5,626
 $3,207
Accrued inventories in-transit505
 313
Accrued other miscellaneous expenses2,326
 2,240
Accrued restructuring394
 
Accrued compensation3,792
 5,042
Income taxes payable1,372
 1,344
Accrued warranty1,471
 2,344
Total$15,486
 $14,490

  

September 30, 2022

  

March 31, 2022

 

Accounts payable

 $18,184  $13,192 

Accrued inventories in-transit

  1,510   2,212 

Accrued other miscellaneous expenses

  5,370   3,602 

Advanced deposits

  2,965   3,021 

Accrued compensation

  5,589   4,642 

Income taxes payable

  411   405 

Accrued product warranty

  2,053   2,066 

Total

 $36,082  $29,140 

The Company generally provides a one to three year warranty on its products, commencing upon installation.delivery or installation where applicable. A provision is recorded upon revenue recognition to cost of revenues for estimated warranty expense based on historical experience.

Product warranty activity was as follows (in thousands):

  

Three Months Ended September 30,

  

Six Months Ended September 30,

 
  

2022

  

2021

  

2022

  

2021

 

Balance at beginning of period

 $1,942  $2,187  $2,066  $2,053 

Acquired warranty obligations

     -      248 

Change in accruals for warranties during the period

  479   206   656   314 

Settlements during the period

  (368)  (238)  (669)  (460)

Balance at end of period

 $2,053  $2,155  $2,053  $2,155 

 Three months ended December 31, Nine months ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2017 2016
Balance at beginning of period$1,852
 $2,694
 $2,344
 $3,601
Change in accruals for warranties during the period25
 591
 152
 1,009
Settlements during the period(406) (608) (1,025) (1,933)
Balance at end of period$1,471
 $2,677
 $1,471
 $2,677

10.

12. Income Taxes

The Company recorded income tax expenses of $0.6 million and $0.5 million in the three and nine months ended December 31, 2017, respectively.

The Company recorded an income tax benefit of less than $0.1 million and an income tax expense of $1.0less than $0.1 million in the three and ninesix months ended December 31, 2016,September 30, 2022, respectively. 

The Company recorded an income tax expense of $0.2 million and income tax benefit of $1.9 million in the three and six months ended September 30, 2021, respectively

As a result of purchase accounting fora difference in book and tax basis related to the acquired intangible assets acquired in the ITC acquisition,Neeltran Acquisition (see Note 2, "Acquisitions"), the Company recorded a deferred tax liability of $1.1$2.3 million forduring the difference in book and tax basis. six months ended September 30, 2021. As a result, the Company was able to benefit from additional deferred tax assets and therefore released a corresponding valuation allowance of $1.1$2.3 million during the nine sixmonths ended December 31, 2017.September 30,2021. Goodwill recognized in the acquisitionNeeltran Acquisition is not deductible for tax purposes.

18

Section 382 of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “IRC”), provides limits on the extent to which a corporation that has undergone an ownership change (as defined in the IRC) can utilize any net operating loss ("NOL") and general business tax credit carryforwards it may have. The Company conducted a study as a result of the Company's May 2017 equity offering to determine whether Section 382 could limit the use of its carryforwards in this manner.  After completing this study, the Company has concluded that the limitation will not have a material impact on its ability to utilize its NOL carryforwards.  If there were material ownership changes subsequent to the study, such changes could limit the Company's ability to utilize its NOL carryforwards. The Company increased its NOL’s by $0.3 million due to acquired losses in the nine months ended December 31, 2017 from ITC. The Company conducted a study on the acquired NOL and concluded that the limitations under Section 382 will not have a material impact on its ability to utilize its NOL carryforwards.

On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (“tax reform”) was signed into law. ASC Topic 740 requires deferred tax assets and liabilities to be measured using the enacted rate for the period in which they are expected to reverse. The tax reform was enacted as of December 22, 2017. Accordingly, the new 21% U.S. Federal corporate tax rate was used to measure the U.S. deferred tax assets and liabilities that will reverse in future periods. The Company's reduction to its net U.S. deferred tax asset was offset by a corresponding reduction to its valuation allowance. In addition, the new legislation includes a transition tax in which all foreign earnings are deemed to be repatriated to the U.S. and taxable at specified rates included within the tax reform. The Company is in the process of calculating the impact of the transition tax. The analysis is complex and encompasses many years. The Company is working with its foreign subsidiaries and their local tax service providers to gather historical information, including historical tax returns, in order to complete the calculation. Pursuant to Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118, the Company's measurement period for the tax impact of the tax law changes is still open. At this time, the Company does not anticipate a material


impact due to the transition tax, and the Company anticipates completing the analysis under ASC Topic 740 by March 31, 2018, at which time the Company expects to be in a position to book any required adjustments for any transition tax impact. The Company does not anticipate any other material tax exposure due to the tax reform at this time.

Accounting for income taxes requires a two-steptwo-step approach to recognizing and measuring uncertain tax positions.  The first step is to evaluate the tax position for recognition by determining if, based on the technical merits, it is more likely than not the position will be sustained upon audit, including resolution of related appeals or litigation processes, if any.  The second step is to measure the tax benefit as the largest amount that is more than 50% likely to be realized upon ultimate settlement.  The Company re-evaluates these uncertain tax positions on a quarterly basis.  The evaluation is based on factors including, but not limited to, changes in facts or circumstances, changes in tax law, effectively settled issues under audit and new audit activity.  Any changes in these factors could result in the recognition of a tax benefit or an additional charge to the tax provision.  The Company did not identify any uncertain tax positions in the ninesix months ended December 31, 2017September 30, 2022 and did not have any gross unrecognized tax benefits as of March 31, 2017.


11. Debt
Senior Secured Term Loans
On December 19, 2014, the Company entered into a second amendment to its Loan and Security Agreement with Hercules (the “Hercules Second Amendment”) and entered into a new term loan, borrowing an additional $1.5 million (the “Term Loan C”).  After closing fees and expenses, the net proceeds to the Company for the Term Loan C were $1.4 million. The Company made interest only payments at an interest rate of 11% through March 16, 2017 when the interest rate was increased to 11.25%, until maturity on June 1, 2017, when Term Loan C was repaid in its entirety.   
Hercules received warrants to purchase 13,927 shares of common stock (the “First Warrant”) and 25,641 shares of common stock (the “Second Warrant”) in conjunction with prior term loans that have been repaid in full. Due to certain adjustment provisions within the warrants, they qualified for liability accounting. The fair value of the warrants, $0.4 million and $0.2 million, respectively, was recorded upon issuance to debt discount and a warrant liability. In conjunction with the Hercules Second Amendment, the First Warrant and Second Warrant were canceled and replaced with the issuance of a new warrant (the “Hercules Warrant”) to purchase 58,823 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $7.85 per share, subject to certain price-based and other anti-dilution adjustments. The Hercules Warrant expires on June 30, 2020. See Note 12, “Warrants and Derivative Liabilities”, for a discussion on the Hercules Warrant and the valuation assumptions used.

The Company recorded no interest expense for the three months ended December 31, 2017 and less than $0.1 million for the three months ended December 31, 2016. Included in the prior year period was less than $0.1 million of non-cash interest expense related to the amortization of the debt discount on the respective term loans. Interest expense on the Term Loans for the nine months ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, was less than $0.1 million and $0.3 million, respectively. Included in the nine months ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 were less than $0.1 million and $0.1 million, respectively, of non-cash interest expense related to the amortization of debt discount on the respective Term Loans.

12. Warrants and Derivative Liabilities
The Company accounts for its warrants and contingent consideration as liabilities due to certain adjustment provisions within the instruments, which require that they be recorded at fair value. The warrants are subject to revaluation at each balance sheet date and any change in fair value is recorded as a change in fair value of warrants until the earlier of its expiration or its exercise at which time the warrant liability will be reclassified to equity. The Company calculated the fair value of the warrants utilizing an integrated lattice model. The contingent consideration is subject to revaluation at each balance sheet date and any change in fair value is recorded as a change in fair value of contingent consideration until the earlier of its settlement or expiration. The Company determined the fair value of the contingent consideration utilizing a Black Scholes option pricing method upon acquisition and as of September 30, 2017. As of December 31, 2017, the actual amount due for the contingent consideration was determined according to the stated formula in the agreement. See Note 5, "Fair Value Measurements", for further discussion.2022.

Senior Convertible Note Warrant
On April 4, 2012, the Company entered into a Purchase Agreement with Capital Ventures International ("CVI"). The Purchase Agreement included a warrant to purchase 309,406 shares of the Company’s common stock (the “Original Warrant”). Pursuant to an exchange in October 2013, the Original Warrant was exchanged for a new warrant (the “Exchanged Warrant”). The Exchanged Warrant expired on October 4, 2017.
Following is a summary of the key assumptions used to calculate the fair value of the Exchanged Warrant:


Fiscal Year 17September 30,
2017
 June 30,
2017
Risk-free interest rate1.05% 1.05%
Expected annual dividend yield 
Expected volatility77.95% 78.25%
Term (years)0.01 0.26
Fair value$— $—
Fiscal Year 16
March 31,
2017
 
December 31,
2016
 
September 30,
2016
 
June 30,
2016
 March 31,
2016
Risk-free interest rate0.91% 0.56% 0.59% 0.48% 0.66%
Expected annual dividend yield    
Expected volatility44.12% 58.04% 70.50% 76.30% 76.76%
Term (years)0.51 0.76 1.01 1.26 1.51
Fair value$— $0.1 million $0.2 million $0.4 million $0.4 million
The Company recorded no change in the fair value of the Exchanged Warrant during the three and nine months ended December 31, 2017. The Company recorded net gains of $0.1 million and $0.3 million resulting from a decrease in the fair value of the Exchanged Warrant in each of the three and nine months ended December 31, 2016, respectively.
Hercules Warrant
On December 19, 2014, the Company entered into the Hercules Second Amendment. See Note 11, “Debt” for additional information.  In conjunction with the agreement, the Company issued the Hercules Warrant to purchase 58,823 shares of the Company’s common stock.  The Hercules Warrant is exercisable at any time after its issuance at an exercise price of $7.85 per share, subject to certain price-based and other anti-dilution adjustments, and expires on June 30, 2020.  
Following is a summary of the key assumptions used to calculate the fair value of the Hercules Warrant:
Fiscal Year 17December 31,
2017
 September 30,
2017
 June 30,
2017
Risk-free interest rate1.98% 1.56% 1.58%
Expected annual dividend yield  
Expected volatility69.11% 63.97% 67.76%
Term (years)2.46 2.72 2.97
Fair value$0.1 million $0.1 million $0.1 million
Fiscal Year 16
March 31,
2017
 
December 31,
2016
 
September 30,
2016
 
June 30,
2016
 March 31,
2016
Risk-free interest rate1.55% 1.57% 0.97% 0.86% 1.08%
Expected annual dividend yield    
Expected volatility66.51% 67.28% 67.98% 68.34% 70.25%
Term (years)3.25 3.50 3.75 4.00 4.25
Fair value$0.2 million $0.2 million $0.2 million $0.3 million $0.2 million
The Company recorded no change and a net gain of $0.1 million, resulting from decreases in the fair value of the Hercules Warrant during the three and nine months ended December 31, 2017, respectively. The Company recorded no change in the fair value of the Hercules Warrant during the three and nine months ended December 31, 2016.
November 2014 Warrant
On November 13, 2014, the Company completed an offering of 909,090 units of the Company’s common stock with Hudson Bay Capital. Each unit consisted of one share of the Company’s common stock and 0.9 of a warrant to purchase one share of common stock, or a warrant to purchase in the aggregate 818,181 shares (the “November 2014 Warrant”).  The November 2014


Warrant is exercisable at any time, at an exercise price equal to $7.81 per share, subject to certain price-based and other anti-dilution adjustments, and expires on November 13, 2019.  
Following is a summary of the key assumptions used to calculate the fair value of the November 2014 Warrant:
Fiscal Year 17December 31,
2017
 September 30,
2017
 June 30,
2017
Risk-free interest rate1.87% 1.49% 1.44%
Expected annual dividend yield  
Expected volatility65.86% 65.64% 67.21%
Term (years)1.87 2.12 2.37
Fair value$0.4 million $0.8 million $0.9 million
Fiscal Year 16
March 31,
2017
 
December 31,
2016
 
September 30,
2016
 
June 30,
2016
 March 31,
2016
Risk-free interest rate1.41% 1.43% 0.93% 0.77% 0.98%
Expected annual dividend yield    
Expected volatility66.53% 69.31% 68.96% 70.01% 69.88%
Term (years)2.62 2.87 3.12 3.37 3.62
Fair value$1.8 million $2.3 million $2.3 million $3.2 million $2.6 million
The Company recorded net gains of $0.4 million and $1.4 million, resulting from decreases in the fair value of the November 2014 Warrant during the three and nine months ended December 31, 2017, respectively. The Company recorded no change and a net gain of $0.3 million, resulting from the decrease in the fair value of the November 2014 Warrant in the three and nine months ended December 31, 2016, respectively.

13.Contingent Consideration

Contingent Consideration

The Company evaluated the ITC acquisition Make Whole PaymentNEPSI Acquisition earnout payment set forth in the SPANEPSI Stock Purchase Agreement (see Note 5, "Fair Value Measurements"2, "Acquisitions" for further details), which ultimately required netmay require settlement cash,in the Company's common stock, and determined the contingent consideration qualified for liability classification and derivative treatment under ASC 815.815,Derivatives and Hedging. As a result, for each period, the fair value of the contingent consideration waswill be remeasured and the resulting gain or loss waswill be recognized in operating expenses.

expenses until the share amount is fixed.

Following is a summary of the key assumptions used in a Monte Carlo simulation to calculate the fair value of the contingent consideration related to the ITC acquisition:

Fiscal Year 17September 30,
2017
 September 25,
2017
Risk-free interest rate1.09% 1.09%
Expected annual dividend yield 
Expected volatility66.54% 65.71%
Term (years)0.31 0.32
Fair value$0.4 million $0.6 million
All of the stock related to this liability was sold as of December 5, 2017 and the amount of the Make Whole Payment was calculated to be $0.7 million, and subsequently paid on January 5, 2018. As such, no fair value estimate using a Black Scholes model was needed as the liability was recorded at the known settlement value for the period ending December 31, 2017. NEPSI Acquisition:

  September 30,  June 30,             

Fiscal Year 2022

 2022  2022             

Revenue risk premium

  5.20%  6.60%            

Revenue volatility

  25%  30%            

Stock Price

 $4.38  $5.18             

Payment delay (days)

  80   80             

Fair value (millions)

 $1.1  $1.4             
                     
  

March 31,

  

December 31,

  

September 30,

  

June 30,

  

March 31,

 

Fiscal Year 2021

 

2022

  

2021

  

2021

  

2021

  

2021

 

Revenue risk premium

  6.50%  6.60%  6.60%  6.60%  6.70%

Revenue volatility

  33%  33%  30%  30%  30%

Stock Price

 $7.61  $10.88  $14.58  $17.39  $18.96 

Payment delay (days)

  80   80   80   80   80 

Fair value (millions)

 $1.2  $2.6  $4.7  $7.2  $7.1 

The Company recorded a net lossesgain of $0.3 million and $0.1 million resulting from increasesthe decrease in the fair value of the contingent consideration in the three and ninesix months ended December 31, 2017, September 30, 2022. The Company recorded a net gain of $2.4 million and $2.3 million resulting from the decrease in the fair value of the contingent consideration in the three and six months ended September 30, 2021, respectively.




13. Stockholders’ Equity
Equity Offerings
On May 5, 2017,

14. Debt

  As part of the Neeltran Acquisition, the Company identified four equipment financing agreements that Neeltran had entered into an underwriting agreement with Oppenheimer & Co. Inc., as representative of several underwriters named therein, relatingprior to the issuanceacquisition on May 6, 2021. The Company determined to account for these agreements as a debt transaction and sale (the "Offering")recorded current and long-term debt liabilities of 4.0$0.1 million each during the three months ended June 30,2021. The current and long-term debt balance is $0.1 million shareseach as of September 30, 2022.

15. Leases

The Company determines whether a contract is or contains a lease at inception of a contract. The Company defines a lease as a contract, or part of a contract, that conveys the right to control the use of identified property or equipment (an identified asset) for a period of time in exchange for consideration. Control over the use of the Company's common stockidentified asset means that the Company has both the right to obtain substantially all of the economic benefits from the use of the asset and the right to direct the use of the asset.

The discount rate was calculated using an incremental borrowing rate based on an assessment prepared by the Company through the use of Company credit ratings, consideration of its lease populations potential risk to its total capital structure, and a market rate for a collateralized loan for its risk profile, calculated by a third party. The Company elected to apply the discount rate using the remaining lease term at the date of adoption for Neeltran lease contracts.

Following the Neeltran Acquisition, the Company evaluated all open Neeltran contracts at the date of the acquisition to determine if any applied under ASC 842 as Neeltran, a public offering price of $4.00 per share. The net proceedsprivate company, had deferred adopting ASC 842 prior to the Neeltran Acquisition, as permitted. The Company identified nine lease contracts with terms greater than twelve months and evaluated them under ASC 842 guidance. As part of the implementation, the Company identified one lease contract that classified as a financing lease. The Company does not expect a material impact to the financial statements on an ongoing basis resulting from the Offering were approximately $14.7 million, after deducting underwriting discountsadoption of the ASC 842 standard for the Neeltran business and commissionsNeeltran will follow the existing policies below.

Operating Leases

All significant lease arrangements are recognized at lease commencement.  Operating lease right–of-use assets and offering expenses payable bylease liabilities are recognized at commencement. The operating lease right-of-use asset includes any lease payments related to initial direct cost and prepayments and excludes any lease incentives. Lease expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the Company.lease term.  The Offering closed on May 10, 2017. In addition,Company enters into a variety of operating lease agreements through the Company granted the underwriters a 30-day option (the “Option”)normal course of its business, but primarily real estate leases to purchase up to an additional 600,000 shares of common stock at the public offering price. On May 24, 2017, the underwriters notified the Company that they had exercised their Option in full.support its operations. The net proceeds to the Company from the Option were approximately $2.3 million, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and offering expenses payable by the Company. The total net proceeds to the Company from the Offeringreal estate lease agreements generally provide for fixed minimum rental payments and the Option were approximately $17.0 million, after deducting underwriting discountspayment of real estate taxes and commissions and offering expenses payable byinsurance. Many of these real estate leases have one or more renewal options that allow the Company. The Option closed on May 26, 2017.

ATM Arrangement
On January 27, 2017, the Company, entered into an At Market Issuance Sales Agreement ("ATM"), pursuant to which, the Company could, at its discretion, sellto renew the lease for varying periods up to $10.0 million offive years or to terminate the Company’s common stock through its sales agent, FBR Capital Markets & Co. ("FBR"). Sales of common stock made underlease. Only renewal options or termination rights that the ATMCompany believed were made pursuantlikely to the prospectus supplement dated January 27, 2017, which supplements the prospectus dated October 1, 2014,be exercised were included in the shelf registrationlease calculations.

The Company also enters into leases for vehicles, IT equipment and service agreements, and other leases related to its manufacturing operations that are also included in the right-of-use assets and lease liability accounts if they are for a term of longer than twelve months. However, many of these leases are either short-term in nature or immaterial. The Company has made the policy election to exclude short-term leases from the balance sheet. 

19

Finance Leases

As part of the adoption of ASC 842 at Neeltran, the Company identified one lease contract that is classified as a finance lease. In February 2020, Neeltran entered into a contract to lease a copy machine for an initial term of 39 months, or through May 2023. The Company concluded that the lease should be classified and accounted for as a finance lease as the total value of the lease payments are greater than fair value of the asset. Accordingly, on May 6, 2021, the Company recognized a finance lease right-of-use asset and a finance lease liability of $13.2 thousand on the Neeltran opening balance sheet. As of September 30, 2022, the right-of-use asset related to the finance lease was $4.2 thousand, net of accumulated amortization of $9.0 thousand, and is included in the property and equipment, net on the Company's consolidated balance sheet.

Finance lease right-of-use assets and lease liabilities are recognized similar to an operating lease, at the lease commencement date or the date the lessor makes the leased asset available for use. Finance lease right-of-use assets are generally amortized on a straight-line basis over the lease term, and the carrying amount of the finance lease liabilities are (1) accreted to reflect interest using the incremental borrowing rate if the rate implicit in the lease is not readily determinable, and (2) reduced to reflect lease payments made during the period. Amortization expense for finance lease right-of-use assets and interest accretion on finance lease liabilities are recorded to depreciation expense and interest expense, respectively in the Company's consolidated statement that AMSC filed with the SEC on of operations.

Supplemental balance sheet information related to leases at September 19, 2014.

During the year ended 30, 2022, and March 31, 2017,2022 are as follows (in thousands):

  

September 30, 2022

  

March 31, 2022

 

Leases:

        

Right-of-use assets - Financing

 $4   8 

Right-of-use assets - Operating

  3,274   3,502 

Total right-of-use assets

  3,278   3,510 
         

Lease liabilities - ST Financing

 $4   7 

Lease liabilities - ST Operating

  818   740 

Lease liabilities - LT Financing

  -   1 

Lease liabilities - LT Operating

  2,572   2,900 

Total lease liabilities

  3,394   3,648 
         

Weighted-average remaining lease term

  4.33   4.93 

Weighted-average discount rate

  6.37%  6.36%

The costs related to the Company received net proceeds of $2.5 million, from sales of approximately 379,693 shares of its common stock at an average sales price of approximately $6.79 per shareCompany's finance lease are not material. The costs related to the Company's operating leases for the three and six months ended September 30, 2022 and 2021 are as follows (in thousands):

  

Three Months Ended

  

Six Months Ended

 
  

September 30, 2022

  

September 30, 2022

 

Operating Leases:

        

Operating lease costs - fixed

 $262  $504 

Operating lease costs - variable

  41   76 

Short-term lease costs

  30   61 

Total lease costs

  333   641 

  

Three Months Ended

  

Six Months Ended

 
  

September 30, 2021

  

September 30, 2021

 

Operating Leases:

        

Operating lease costs - fixed

 $238  $469 

Operating lease costs - variable

  32   63 

Short-term lease costs

  65   131 

Total lease costs

  335   663 

The Company’s estimated minimum future lease obligations under the ATM.  No sales of the Company's common stock were made under the ATM after March 31, 2017. On May 4, 2017, the Company provided to FBR a notice of termination of the ATM.leases are as follows (in thousands): 

  

Leases

 

Year ended March 31,

    

2023

 $506 

2024

  969 

2025

  778 

2026

  719 

2027

  579 

Thereafter

  357 

Total minimum lease payments

  3,908 

Less: interest

  514 

Present value of lease liabilities

  3,394 

20

Stock Purchase Agreement
On September 25, 2017, the Company entered into the SPA with ITC. The purchase price was approximately $3.8 million, consisting of 884,890 AMSC Shares and $0.1 million in cash. See Note 4, “Acquisition and Related Goodwill” for further discussion.

14.

16. Commitments and Contingencies

Legal Contingencies

From time to time, the Company is involved in legal and administrative proceedings and claims of various types. The Company records a liability in its consolidated financial statements for these matters when a loss is known or considered probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated. The Company reviews these estimates each accounting period as additional information is known and adjusts the loss provision when appropriate. If a matter is both probable to result in a liability and the amounts of loss can be reasonably estimated, the Company estimates and discloses the possible loss or range of loss to the extent necessary to make the consolidated financial statements not misleading. If the loss is not probable or cannot be reasonably estimated, a liability is not recorded in its consolidated financial statements.

On September 13, 2011, the Company commenced a series of legal actions in China against Sinovel Wind Group Co. Ltd. (“Sinovel”). The Company’s Chinese subsidiary, Suzhou AMSC Superconductor Co. Ltd., filed a claim for arbitration with the Beijing Arbitration Commission in accordance with the terms of the Company’s supply contracts with Sinovel. The case is captioned (2011) Jing Zhong An Zi No. 963. The Company alleges that Sinovel committed various material breaches of its contracts with the Company and Sinovel has refused to pay past due amounts for prior shipments of core electrical components and spare parts. The Company is seeking compensation for past product shipments and retention (including interest) in the amount of approximately RMB 485 million (approximately $75 million) due to Sinovel’s breaches of its contracts. The Company is also seeking specific performance of its existing contracts as well as reimbursement of all costs and reasonable expenses with respect to the arbitration. The value of the undelivered components under the existing contracts, including the deliveries refused by Sinovel in March 2011, amounts to approximately RMB 4.6 billion (approximately $707 million).


On October 8, 2011, Sinovel filed with the Beijing Arbitration Commission an application under the caption (2011) Jing Zhong An Zi No. 963, for a counterclaim against the Company for breach of the same contracts under which the Company filed its original arbitration claim. Sinovel claims, among other things, that the goods supplied by the Company do not conform to the standards specified in the contracts and claims damages in the amount of approximately RMB 1.2 billion (approximately $184 million) upon Sinovel’s requests for change of counterclaim. On February 27, 2012, Sinovel filed with the Beijing Arbitration Commission an application under the caption (2012) Jing Zhong An Zi No. 157, against the Company for breach of the same contracts under which the Company filed its original arbitration claim. Sinovel claims, among other things, that the goods supplied by the Company do not conform to the standards specified in the contracts and claims damages in the amount of approximately RMB 105 million (approximately $16 million). The Company believes that Sinovel’s claims are without merit and it intends to defend these actions vigorously. Since the proceedings in this matter are still in the early technical review phase, the Company cannot reasonably estimate possible losses or range of losses at this time.

Other

The Company enters into long-term construction contracts with customers that require the Company to obtain performance bonds. The Company is required to deposit an amount equivalent to some or all the face amount of the performance bonds into an escrow account until the termination of the bond. When the performance conditions are met, amounts deposited as collateral for the performance bonds are returned to the Company. In addition, the Company has various contractual arrangements in which minimum quantities of goods or services have been committed to be purchased on an annual basis.

As of December 31, 2017,September 30, 2022, the Company had $0.2$6.0 million of restricted cash included in long-term assets and $3.6 million of restricted cash included in current assets. As of March 31, 2022, the Company had $6.1 million of restricted cash included in long term assets and $2.8 million of restricted cash included in current assets. These amounts included in restricted cash primarily represent deposits to secure letters of credit for various supply contracts.contracts and long-term projects, including the irrevocable letter of credit in the amount of $5.0 million to secure certain of the Company's obligations under a subcontract agreement with ComEd.  These deposits are held in interest bearing accounts.

During the nine months ended December 31, 2017, the Company received $1.0 million related to the achievement of certain milestones following the previous sale of the Company's minority interest in Blade Dynamics Limited.
On September 25, 2017, the Company acquired ITC for a purchase price of approximately $3.8 million, consisting of $0.1 million in cash and the AMSC Shares. The Company paid certain selling stockholders the Make Whole Payment given that the value of the AMSC Shares sold was less than the agreed upon purchase price. The amount of this payment, which was made on January 5, 2018, was $0.7 million and settled the related contingent liability. See Note 4, “Acquisitions and Related Goodwill” for further discussion.

15. Restructuring
The Company accounts for charges resulting from operational restructuring actions in accordance with ASC Topic 420, Exit or Disposal Cost Obligations (“ASC 420”) and ASC Topic 712, Compensation—Nonretirement Postemployment Benefits (“ASC 712”). In accounting for these obligations, the Company is required to make assumptions related to the amounts of employee severance, benefits, and related costs and the time period over which leased facilities will remain vacant, sublease terms, sublease rates and discount rates. Estimates and assumptions are based on the best information available at the time the obligation arises. These estimates are reviewed and revised as facts and circumstances dictate; changes in these estimates could have a material effect on the amount accrued on the consolidated balance sheet.
On April 3, 2017, the Board of Directors approved a plan to reduce the Company’s global workforce by approximately 8%, effective April 4, 2017. The purpose of the workforce reduction was to reduce operating expenses to better align with the Company’s current revenues. Included in the $1.3 million severance pay, charged to operations in the nine months ended December 31, 2017, is $0.5 million of severance pay for one of the Company's former executive officers pursuant to the terms of a severance agreement dated June 30, 2017. Under the terms of the severance agreement, the Company's former executive officer is entitled to 18 months of his base salary, which is expected to be paid by December 31, 2018. From and after January 1, 2018, the Company, at its discretion, may settle any remaining unpaid cash severance owed to its former executive officer through the issuance of a number of immediately vested shares of the Company’s common stock, determined by multiplying the remaining unpaid cash severance owed by 120%, and then dividing by the closing stock price per share of the Company's common stock as of the last business day prior to the issuance of the shares.
All amounts related to these restructuring activities are expected to be paid by December 31, 2018.
The following table presents restructuring charges and cash payments for the nine months ended December 31, 2017 (in thousands):


 Severance pay

and benefits
Accrued restructuring balance at April 1, 2017$
Charges to operations1,328
Cash payments(934)
Accrued restructuring balance at December 31, 2017$394
All restructuring charges discussed above are included within restructuring in the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations. The Company includes accrued restructuring within accounts payable and accrued expenses.

16.

17. Business Segments

The Company reports its financial results in two reportable business segments: WindGrid and Grid.

Wind.

Through the Company’s Windtec Solutions, the Wind business segment enables manufacturers to field wind turbines with exceptional power output, reliability and affordability. The Company supplies advanced power electronics and control systems, licenses its highly engineered wind turbine designs, and provides extensive customer support services to wind turbine manufacturers. The Company’s design portfolio includes a broad range of drive trains and power ratings of 2 megawatts ("MWs") and higher. The Company provides a broad range of power electronics and software-based control systems that are highly integrated and designed for optimized performance, efficiency, and grid compatibility.

Through the Company’s Gridtec Solutions,offerings, the Grid business segment enables electric utilities, industrial facilities, and renewable energy project developers to connect, transmit and distribute power with exceptional efficiency, reliability, security and affordability.affordability through its transmission planning services, power electronics, and superconductor-based systems. The sales process is enabled by transmission planning services that allow it to identify power grid congestion, poor power quality and other risks, which helps the Company determine how its solutions can improve network performance. These services often lead to sales of grid interconnection solutions for wind farms and solar power plants, power quality systems, and transmission and distribution cable systems.  The Company also sells ship protection products to the U.S. Navy through its Grid business segment.

Through the Company’s wind power offerings, the Wind business segment enables manufacturers to field wind turbines with exceptional power output, reliability and affordability.  The Company provides advanced power electronics and control system products, engineered designs, and support services. The Company supplies advanced power electronics and control systems, licenses its highly engineered wind turbine designs, and provides extensive customer support services to wind turbine manufacturers. The Company’s design portfolio includes a broad range of drivetrains and power ratings of 2 megawatts ("MWs") and higher. The Company provides a broad range of power electronics and software-based control systems that are highly integrated and designed for optimized performance, efficiency, and grid compatibility.

The operating results for the two business segments are as follows (in thousands):

  

Three Months Ended September 30,

  

Six Months Ended September 30,

 
  

2022

  

2021

  

2022

  

2021

 

Revenues:

                

Grid

 $25,698  $24,619  $45,527  $48,119 

Wind

  1,982   3,289   4,833   5,209 

Total

 $27,680  $27,908  $50,360  $53,328 

  

Three Months Ended September 30,

  

Six Months Ended September 30,

 
  

2022

  

2021

  

2022

  

2021

 

Operating loss:

                

Grid

 $(6,495) $(5,836) $(13,776) $(11,180)

Wind

  (868)  205   (1,254)  (558)

Unallocated corporate expenses

  (729)  1,329   (1,931)  (63)

Total

 $(8,092) $(4,302) $(16,961) $(11,801)

21
 Three months ended December 31, Nine months ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2017 2016
Revenues:
       
Wind$2,633
 $18,248
 $10,465
 $36,822
Grid12,300
 8,900
 24,439
 22,178
Total$14,933
 $27,148
 $34,904
 $59,000

 Three months ended December 31, Nine months ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2017 2016
Operating loss:       
Wind$(1,684) $1,044
 $(7,557) $(3,220)
Grid(1,011) (4,491) (15,279) (15,068)
Unallocated corporate expenses(1,156) (613) (3,514) (2,266)
Total$(3,851) $(4,060) $(26,350) $(20,554)

The accounting policies of the business segments are the same as those for the consolidated Company. The Company’s business segments have been determined in accordance with the Company’s internal management structure, which is organized based on operating activities. The Company evaluates performance based upon several factors, of which the primary financial measures are segment revenues and segment operating loss. The disaggregated financial results of the segments reflect allocation of certain functional expense categories consistent with the basis and manner in which Company management internally disaggregates financial information for the purpose of assisting in making internal operating decisions. In addition, certain corporate expenses which the Company does not believe are specifically attributable or allocable to either of the two business segments have been excluded from the segment operating loss.



Unallocated corporate expenses primarilyconsist of a gain on contingent consideration of $0.3 million and $0.1 million in the three and six months ended September 30, 2022. Unallocated corporate expenses consist of a gain on contingent consideration of $2.4 million and $2.3 million in the three and six months ended September 30,2021. Additionally, unallocated corporate expenses consist of stock-based compensation expense of $0.9$1.0 million and $0.6$1.1 million in the three months ended December 31, 2017September 30, 2022, and 2016, respectively. Unallocated corporate expenses primarily consist of stock-based compensation expense of2021, respectively and $2.1 million and $2.3$2.4 million in the ninesix months ended December 31, 2017 September 30, 2022 and 2016,2021, respectively. Additionally, a restructuring charge of $1.3 million is included in the nine months ended December 31, 2017, as well as losses for the change in fair value of the contingent consideration of $0.3 million and $0.1 million in the three and nine months ended December 31, 2017.

Total assets for the two business segments as of December 31, 2017September 30, 2022, and March 31, 20172022, are as follows (in thousands):

  

September 30, 2022

  

March 31, 2022

 

Grid

 $121,227  $114,053 

Wind

  9,716   9,866 

Corporate assets

  40,804   49,968 

Total

 $171,747  $173,887 

 December 31,
2017
 March 31,
2017
Wind$15,303
 $18,346
Grid36,165
 31,060
Corporate assets45,303
 50,838
Total$96,771
 $100,244
The following table sets forth customers who represented 10% or more of the Company’s total revenues for the three and nine months ended December 31, 2017 and 2016:
 Three months ended December 31, Nine months ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2017 2016
Inox Wind Limited15% 66% 27% 58%
Vestas Middle East S.L.U.27% % 11% %
SSE Generation Ltd.17% % <10%
 %
Hidalgo Wind Farm LLC<10%
 17% <10%
 <10%

17.

18. Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) and the International Accounting Standards Board ("IASB") issued, ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606). The guidance substantially converges final standards on revenue recognition between the FASB and IASB providing a framework on addressing revenue recognition issues and, upon its effective date, replaces almost all existing revenue recognition guidance, including industry-specific guidance, in current U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The FASB has subsequently issued the following amendments to ASU 2014-09 which are all effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. 


In MarchJune 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-08, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent Considerations, which clarifies the implementation guidance on principal versus agent considerations.
In April 2016 the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-10, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing, which clarifies certain aspects of identifying performance obligations and licensing implementation guidance.
In May 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-12, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Narrow- Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients related to disclosures of remaining performance obligations, as well as other amendments to guidance on collectability, non-cash consideration and the presentation of sales and other similar taxes collected from customers.
In December 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-20, Technical Corrections and Improvements to Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which amends certain narrow aspects of the guidance issued in ASU 2014-09 including guidance related to the disclosure of remaining performance obligations and prior-period performance obligations, as well as other amendments to the guidance on loan guarantee fees, contract costs, refund liabilities, advertising costs and the clarification of certain examples.



As of December 31, 2017, the Company has made significant progress towards completing its assessment of the potential effects of ASU 2014-09 and its amendments on its consolidated financial statements, and is actively assessing the potential effects on business processes, systems and controls to support revenue recognition and the related disclosures under this ASU. The Company’s assessment includes a detailed review of representative contracts from each of the Company’s revenue streams and a comparison of its historical accounting policies and practices to the new standard. The Company is required to adopt the new standards on April 1, 2018, and expects to do so retrospectively with the cumulative effect of initially applying the guidance recognized at the date of initial application (the modified retrospective transition method). Additionally, this guidance could lead to recognizing certain revenue transactions sooner than in the past on certain contracts, as the Company will need to estimate the revenue it will be entitled to upon contract completion, and later on other contracts, due to lack of an enforceable right to payment for performance obligations satisfied over time. The Company's preliminary assessment of this adoption method supports the determination that there are no expected changes in the accounting for its largest revenue stream which includes Inox Wind Limited as its primary customer. Across other revenue streams the timing of revenue recognition could be affected for multiple types of contracts, primarily multiple element contracts in its grid business unit, but those differences are not expected to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements. However, the Company's assessment is not yet finalized and is subject to change. Additionally, the Company is currently evaluating any tax implications the adoption of this new standard may have on the consolidated financial statements. As part of this analysis, the Company is evaluating its information technology capabilities and systems, and does not expect to incur significant information technology costs to modify systems currently in place.
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017, the Company plans to assess its current revenue controls, and identify and implement any changes that may be necessary to comply with its new revenue policies and the provisions of ASU 2014-09, which will be effective for the Company as of April 1, 2018.
In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, Financial Instruments-Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities.  The amendments in ASU 2016-01 will enhance the reporting model for financial instruments to provide users of financial statements with more decision-useful information. This ASU is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years.  The Company does not expect any significant changes to the consolidated financial statement results with the adoption of ASU 2016-01.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842). The guidance in this ASU supersedes the leasing guidance in Topic 840, Leases. Under the new guidance, lessees are required to recognize lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet for all leases with terms longer than 12 months. Leases will be classified as either finance or operating, with classification affecting the pattern of expense recognition in the income statement. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years. A modified retrospective transition approach is required for lessees for capital and operating leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements, with certain practical expedients available. The Company is currently evaluating the effects adoption of this guidance will have on its consolidated financial statements.
In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, -13,Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326)326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments. The amendments in ASU 2016-132016-13 will provide more decision-useful information about the expected credit losses on financial instruments and other commitments to extend credit held by a reporting entity at each reporting date. TheFollowing the release of ASU is2019-10 in November 2019, the new effective fordate, as long as the Company remains a smaller reporting company, would be annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim2022.The Company evaluated the impact of the adoption of ASU 2016-13, and does not expect it to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In October 2021, the FASB issued ASU 2021-08,Business Combinations (Topic 805): Accounting for Contract Assets and Contract Liabilities from Contracts with Customers. The amendments in ASU 2021-08 will improve the accounting for acquired revenue contracts with customers in a business combination. Following the release of ASU 2021-08 in October 2021, the new effective date will be annual reporting periods within that year.  beginning after December 15, 2022. The Company is currently evaluating the impact, if any, that the adoption of ASU 2016-13 2021-08may have on its consolidated financial statements.

In 2016, November 2021, the FASB issued ASU 2021-10,Government Assistance (Topic 832): Disclosures by Business Entities about Government Assistance. The amendments in ASU 2021-10 will improve financial reporting by requiring disclosures that increase the following two ASU's on Statementtransparency of Cash Flows (Topic 230). Both amendments aretransactions with government accounted for by applying a grant or contribution accounting model by analogy. Following the release of ASU 2021-10 in November 2021, the new effective fordate will be annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within that year.

In August 2016, 2021. As of April 1, 2022, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments. The amendments in ASU 2016-15 will provide more guidance towards the classification of multiple different types of cash flows in order to reduce the diversity in reporting across entities.
In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash. The amendments in ASU 2016-18 will explain the change during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. Therefore, amounts generally described as restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents should be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts shown on the statement of cash flows.
The Company does not expect any significant changes to the consolidated financial statement results with the adoption of ASU 2016-15 and ASU 2016-18.


In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-16, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory. The amendments in ASU 2016-16 will improve the accounting for the income tax consequences of intra-entity transfers of assets other than inventory. The ASU is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within that year.  The Company does not anticipate any significant changes to the consolidated financial statement results with the adoption of ASU 2016-16.
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-01, Business Combinations. The amendments in ASU 2017-01 will clarify the definition of a business with the objective of adding guidance to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. The ASU is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those periods.  The Companyhas adopted ASU 2017-01 effective September 30, 2017, following the Acquisition of ITC. The Company considered these amendments in its decision to record the combination of the entities as an acquisition of a business. See Note 4, "Acquisition2021-10 and Related Goodwill", for further details. These impacts have been included in the consolidated financial statements.
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-03, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections (Topic 250) and Investments - Equity Method and Joint Ventures. The amendments in ASU 2017-03 provide additional detail surrounding disclosures required related to adoption of new pronouncements. The ASU is effective for the periods of each related pronouncement.  The Company is currently evaluating thenoted no material impact the adoption of ASU 2017-03 may have on its consolidated financial statements.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment. The amendments in ASU 2017-04 eliminated the prior requirement to perform procedures to determine the fair value at the impairment testing date of an entity's assets and liabilities (including unrecognized assets and liabilities) following the procedure that would be required in determining the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination. Under the new guidelines an entity should perform its annual, or interim, goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount. An entity should recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value. The ASU is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted for interim or annual goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017. Following the Acquisition of ITC, the Company performed an analysis and determined that the transaction included a portion of goodwill. The Company has accounted for that value on its balance sheet as of December 31, 2017. See Note 4, "Acquisition and Related Goodwill" for further details. The Company adopted ASU 2017-04 effective September 30, 2017, and determined there were no triggering events requiring further impairment analysis at this time. The Company expects to perform its annual impairment test during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017.
In February 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-05, Other Income - Gains and Losses from the Derecognition of Non-financial Assets (Subtopic 610-20). The amendments in ASU 2017-05 clarify the scope of Subtopic 610-20, Other Income-Gains and Losses from the Derecognition of Non-financial Assets, and to add guidance for partial sales of non-financial assets. Subtopic 610-20, which was issued in May 2014 as a part of Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), provides guidance for recognizing gains and losses from the transfer of non-financial assets in contracts with non-customers.  The Company does not expect any significant changes to the consolidated financial statement results with the adoption of ASU 2017-05.
In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-09, Compensation - Stock Compensation (Subtopic 718) Scope of Modification Accounting. The amendments in ASU 2017-09 provide clarity and reduce both (1) diversity in practice and (2) cost and complexity when applying the guidance in Topic 718, Compensation—Stock Compensation, to a change to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award.  The ASU is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those periods. The Company does not expect any significant changes to the consolidated financial statement results with the adoption of ASU 2017-09.
In July 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-11, Earnings per Share (Topic 260), Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity (Topic 480), and Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815). The amendments in ASU 2017-11 provide guidance for freestanding equity-linked financial instruments, such as warrants and conversion options in convertible debt or preferred stock, and should no longer be accounted for as a derivative liability at fair value as a result of the existence of a down round feature. The ASU is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those periods. The Company is currently evaluating the impact the adoption of ASU 2017-11 may have on its consolidated financial statements.
In August 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-12, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities. The amendments in ASU 2017-12 provide improved financial reporting of hedging relationships to better portray the economic results of an entity’s risk management activities in its financial statements. In addition, the amendments in this update make certain targeted improvements to simplify the application of the hedge accounting guidance. The ASU is effective


for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those periods. The Company is currently evaluating the impact the adoption of ASU 2017-12 may have on its consolidated financial statements.

18.

19. Subsequent Events

On February 1, 2018, ASC Devens, LLC (the “Seller”), a wholly owned subsidiary of American Superconductor Corporation (the “Company”), entered into a Purchase and Sale Agreement (the “PSA”) with 64 Jackson LLC (the “Purchaser”) and Stewart Title Guaranty Company (“Escrow Agent”), pursuant to which the Seller has agreed to sell to the Purchaser certain real property located at 64 Jackson Road, Devens, Massachusetts, as described in the PSA, including the building that has served as the Company’s headquarters (collectively, the “Property”), in exchange for total consideration of $23.0 million, which is composed of (i) cash consideration of $17.0 million, and (ii) a $6.0 million subordinated secured commercial promissory note payable to the Seller (the “Seller Note”) at an interest rate equal to the short-term applicable federal rate then in effect at closing (the “Transaction”). The cash consideration includes a deposit of $500,000 (the “First Deposit”), which the Purchaser has agreed to deposit with the Escrow Agent within three business days after the execution of the PSA, and a second deposit (together with the First Deposit, the “Deposit”) of $500,000, which the Purchaser has agreed to deposit with the Escrow Agent on February 15, 2018, provided that the Seller has not terminated the PSA by that date. The PSA contains customary representations, warranties and covenants of the Seller and the Purchaser. The Transaction is anticipated to close on March 30, 2018. Pursuant to the PSA, at closing, the Escrow Agent has agreed to deliver the Deposit to the Seller, and Purchaser has agreed to deliver the remaining cash consideration and the Seller Note to the Seller. The closing of the Transaction is not contingent on any due diligence investigations (other than title), permitting, or financing, however, there is no guarantee that the Transaction will close in the timeframe the Company expects, or at all.
According to the Seller Note, the form of which is attached as Exhibit B to the PSA, $3,000,000 in principal, together with all accrued interest, is due and payable to the Seller on March 31, 2019, and $3,000,000 in principal, together with all accrued interest, is due and payable to the Seller on March 31, 2020, provided that, if the Purchaser sells the Property, all unpaid principal and accrued interest must be repaid in full.

The Company has performed an evaluation of subsequent events through the time of filing this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q10-Q with the SEC and has determined that other than those disclosed above, there are no such events to report.

22



AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORPORATION

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS


ITEM 2.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS


This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). For this purpose, any statements contained herein that relate to future events or conditions, including without limitation, the statements in Part II, “Item 1A. Risk Factors” and in Part I under “Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and located elsewhere herein regarding industry prospects, or our prospective results of operations or financial position, the benefits of our acquisition of Northeast Power Systems, Inc. ("NEPSI") and Neeltran, Inc. ("Neeltran"), changes in macroeconomic and market conditions, including increasing inflation and impacts from the COVID-19 pandemic, sourcing, production disruption, material delays and global supply chain disruptions and adoption of accounting changes may be deemed to be forward-looking statements. Without limiting the foregoing, the words “believes,” “anticipates,” “plans,” “expects,” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements represent management’s current expectations and are inherently uncertain. There are a number of important factors that could materially impact the value of our common stock or cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated by such forward-looking statements. These important factors include, but are not limited to: A significant portion of our revenues are derived from a single customer, Inox; We have a history of operating losses, and negative operating cash flows, which may continue in the future and require us to secure additional financing in the future;future. Our operating results may fluctuate significantly from quarter to quarter and may fall below expectations in any particular fiscal quarter; Our financial conditionWe have a history of negative operating cash flows, and we may have an adverse effect on our customer and supplier relationships; Our successrequire additional financing in addressing the wind energy market is dependent on the manufacturers that license our designs; Our success is dependent upon attracting and retaining qualified personnel and our inability to do so could significantly damage our business and prospects; We rely upon third-party suppliers for the components and sub-assemblies of many of our Wind and Grid products, making us vulnerable to supply shortages and price fluctuations; Failure to successfully execute any move of our Devens, Massachusetts manufacturing facility or achieve expected savings or other anticipated benefits following any move could adversely impact our financial performance; We may not realize all of the sales expected from our backlog of orders and contracts; Our success depends upon the commercial use of high temperature superconductor products,future, which is currently limited, and a widespread commercial market for our products may not develop; Growth of the wind energy market depends largely on the availability and size of government subsidies, economic incentives and legislative programs designed to support the growth of wind energy; Our contracts with the U.S. government are subject to audit, modification or termination by the U.S. government and include certain other provisions in favor of the government, and additional funding of such contracts may not be approved by the U.S. Congress; Tax reform in the U.S.available to us; We may negatively affect our operating results; We have operations in and depend on sales in emerging markets, including India, and global conditions could negatively affect our operating resultsbe required to issue performance bonds or limitprovide letters of credit, which restricts our ability to expandaccess any cash used as collateral for the bonds or letters of credit; Changes in exchange rates could adversely affect our operations outsideresults of these markets; Our business and operations would be adversely impacted in the event of a failure or security breach of our information technology infrastructure;operations; If we fail to maintain proper and effective internal control over financial reporting, our ability to produce accurate and timely financial statements could be impaired and may lead investors and other users to lose confidence in our financial data; We face risksmay not realize all of the sales expected from our backlog of orders and contracts; Our contracts with the U.S. government are subject to audit, modification or termination by the U.S. government and include certain other provisions in favor of the government. The continued funding of such contracts remains subject to annual congressional appropriation, which, if not approved, could reduce our revenue and lower or eliminate our profit; The COVID-19 pandemic could adversely impact our business, financial condition and results of operations;Changes in U.S. government defense spending could negatively impact our financial position, results of operations, liquidity and overall business; We rely upon third-party suppliers for the components and subassemblies of many of our Grid and Wind products, making us vulnerable to supply shortages and price fluctuations, which could harm our business; Uncertainty surrounding our prospects and financial condition may have an adverse effect on our customer and supplier relationships; We have not manufactured our Amperium wire in commercial quantities, and a failure to manufacture our Amperium wire in commercial quantities at acceptable cost and quality levels would substantially limit our future revenue and profit potential; Our success is dependent upon attracting and retaining qualified personnel and our inability to do so could significantly damage our business and prospects; A significant portion of our Wind segment revenues are derived from a single customer. If this customer's business is negatively affected, it could adversely impact our business;Our success in addressing the wind energy market is dependent on the manufacturers that license our designs;Our business and operations would be adversely impacted in the event of a failure or security breach of our or any critical third partiesinformation technology infrastructure and networks; Failure to comply with evolving data privacy and data protection laws and regulations or to otherwise protect personal data, may adversely impact our business and financial results; Many of our revenue opportunities are dependent upon subcontractors and other business collaborators; If we fail to implement our business strategy successfully, our financial performance could be harmed; Problems with product quality or product performance may cause us to incur warranty expenses and may damage our market reputation and prevent us from achieving increased sales and market share; Many of our customers outside of the United States may be either directly or indirectly related to governmental entities, and we could be adversely affected by violations of the United States Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and similar worldwide anti-bribery laws outside the United States; We have had limited success marketing and selling our superconductor products and system-level solutions, and our failure to more broadly market and sell our products and solutions could lower our revenue and cash flow;We may acquire additional complementary businesses or technologies, which may require us to incur substantial costs for which we may never realize the anticipated benefits; Our success depends upon the commercial adoption of the REG system, which is currently limited, and a widespread commercial market for our products may not develop; Adverse changes in domestic and global economic conditions could adversely affect our operating results; We have operations in, and depend on sales in, emerging markets, including India, and global conditions could negatively affect our operating results or limit our ability to expand our operations outside of these markets. Changes in Indias political, social, regulatory and economic environment may affect our financial performance; Our products face competition, which could limit our ability to acquire or retain customers; Our international operations are subject to risks that we do not face in the United States, which could have an adverse effect on our operating results; Growth of the wind energy market depends largely on the availability and size of government subsidies, economic incentives and legislative programs designed to support the growth of wind energy; Lower prices for other fuel sources may reduce the demand for wind energy development, which could have a material adverse effect on our ability to grow our Wind business; The increasing focus on environmental sustainability and social initiatives could increase our costs, and inaction could harm our reputation and adversely impact our financial results; We may be unable to adequately prevent disclosure of trade secrets and other proprietary information;Our patents may not provide meaningful protection for our technology, which could result in us losing some or all of our market position; There are a number of technological challenges that must be successfully addressed before our superconductor products can gain widespread commercial acceptance, and our inability to address such technological challenges could adversely affect our ability to acquire customers for our products; Third parties have or may acquire patents that cover the materials, processes and technologies we use or may use in the future to manufacture our Amperium products, and our success depends on our ability to license such patents or other proprietary rights; Our technology and products could infringe intellectual property;property rights of others, which may require costly litigation and, if we are not successful, could cause us to pay substantial damages and disrupt our business; We face risks related to our legal proceedings; We face risks related to our common stock; and the other important factors discussed under the caption "Risk Factors" in Part 1. Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017,2022, and our other reports filed with the SEC.These and the important factors, discussed under the caption “Risk Factors” in Part 1. Item 1A of our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017 among others, could cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated by forward-looking statements made herein and presented elsewhere by management from time to time. Any such forward-looking statements represent management’s estimates as of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. While we may elect to update such forward-looking statements at some point in the future, we disclaim any obligation to do so, even if subsequent events cause our views to change. These forward-looking statements should not be relied upon as representing our views as of any date subsequent to the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

American Superconductor®Superconductor®, Amperium®Amperium®, AMSC®AMSC®, D-VAR®, PowerModule™, D-VAR VVO®, PowerModulePQ-IVR®, D-VAR® VVO, PQ-IVR®SeaTitan®, SeaTitan, GridtecGridtec™ Solutions,, Windtec Windtec™ Solutions, and Smarter, Cleaner...Better EnergyEnergy™, Orchestrate the Rhythm and Harmony of Power on the Grid™, actiVAR®, armorVAR™, NEPSI™ and Neeltran™ and SafetyLOCK™ are trademarks or registered trademarks of American Superconductor Corporation or our subsidiaries. We reserve all of our rights with respect to our trademarks or registered trademarks regardless of whether they are so designated in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q by an ® or symbol. All other brand names, product names, trademarks or service marks appearing in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are the property of their respective holders.


Executive Overview

We are a leading system provider of megawatt-scale resiliency solutions that lowerorchestrate the costrhythm and harmony of wind power on the grid™, and enhancethat protect and expand the performancecapability of the U.S. Navy's fleet. In the power grid.grid market, we enable electric utilities, industrial facilities, and renewable energy project developers to connect, transmit and distribute smarter, cleaner and better power through our transmission planning services and power electronics and superconductor-based systems. In the wind power market, we enable manufacturers to field highly competitive wind turbines through our advanced



power electronics and control system products, engineering, and support services. In theOur power grid market, we enable electric utilities and renewable energy project developers to connect, transmit and distribute power through our transmission planning services and power electronics and superconductor-based products. Our wind and power grid products and services provide exceptional reliability, security, efficiency and affordability to our customers.

Our wind and power gridsystem solutions help to improve energy efficiency, alleviate power grid capacity constraints, improve system resiliency, and increase the adoption of renewable energy generation. Demand for our solutions is driven by the growing needs for modernized smart grids that improve power reliability, security and quality, the U.S. Navy's effort to upgrade on-board power systems to support fleet electrification, and the need for increased renewable sources of electricity, such as wind and solar energy, and for modernized smart grids that improve power reliability, security and quality.energy. Concerns about these factors have led to increased spending by corporations and the military, as well as supportive government regulations and initiatives on local, state, national and globalnational levels, including renewable portfolio standards, tax incentives and international treaties.

We manufacture products using two proprietary core technologies: PowerModulePowerModule™ programmable power electronic converters and our AmperiumAmperium® high temperature superconductor (“HTS”) wires. These technologies and our system-level solutions are protected by a broad and deep intellectual property portfolio consisting of hundreds of patents and licenses worldwide.

We operate our business under two market-facing business units: WindGrid and Grid.Wind. We believe this market-centric structure enables us to more effectively anticipate and meet the needs of wind turbine manufacturers,the U.S. Navy, electric utilities, industrial facilities, power generation project developers and electric utilities.

Wind. Through our Windtec Solutions, our Wind business segment enables manufacturers to field wind turbines with exceptional power output, reliability and affordability. We supply advanced power electronics and control systems, license our highly engineered wind turbine designs, and provide extensive customer support services to wind turbine manufacturers. Our design portfolio includes a broad range of drive trains and power ratings of 2 megawatts (“MW”) and higher. We provide a broad range of power electronics and software-based control systems that are highly integrated and designed for optimized performance, efficiency, and grid compatibility.
Grid. Through our Gridtec Solutions, our Grid business segment enables electric utilities and renewable energy project developers to connect, transmit and distribute power with exceptional efficiency, reliability, security and affordability. We provide transmission planning services that allow us to identify power grid congestion, poor power quality, and other risks, which help us determine how our solutions can improve network performance. These services often lead to sales of our grid interconnection solutions for wind farms and solar power plants, power quality systems and transmission and distribution cable systems.  We also sell ship protection products to the U.S. Navy through our Grid business segment.

Grid. Through our Gridtec™ Solutions, our Grid business segment enables electric utilities, industrial facilities, and renewable energy project developers to connect, transmit and distribute power with exceptional efficiency, reliability, security and affordability. We provide transmission planning services that allow us to identify power grid congestion, poor power quality, and other risks, which help us determine how our solutions can improve network performance. These services often lead to sales of our grid interconnection solutions for wind farms and solar power plants, power quality systems and transmission and distribution cable systems.  We also sell ship protection products to the U.S. Navy through our Grid business segment.

Wind. Through our Windtec™ Solutions, our Wind business segment enables manufacturers to field wind turbines with exceptional power output, reliability and affordability. We supply advanced power electronics and control systems, license our highly engineered wind turbine designs, and provide extensive customer support services to wind turbine manufacturers. Our design portfolio includes a broad range of drivetrains and power ratings of 2 MW and higher. We provide a broad range of power electronics and software-based control systems that are highly integrated and designed for optimized performance, efficiency, and grid compatibility.

Our fiscal year begins on April 1 and ends on March 31. When we refer to a particular fiscal year, we are referring to the fiscal year beginningthat began on April 1 of that same year. For example, fiscal 20172022 refers to the fiscal year beginningthat began on April 1, 2017.2022. Other fiscal years follow similarly.

On September 25, 2017,October 31, 2018, we acquired Infinia Technology Corporationentered into a Subcontract Agreement with Commonwealth Edison Company (“ITC”ComEd”) (the “Subcontract Agreement”) for approximately $3.8 million as described belowthe manufacture and installation of the Company’s resilient electric grid ("REG") system within ComEd’s electric grid in Chicago, Illinois (the “Acquisition”“Project”). Located in Richmond, Washington, ITC is a technology firm founded in 2009 specializingAs provided in the design, developmentSubcontract Agreement, the Subcontract Agreement became effective upon the signing of an amendment by us and commercializationthe U.S. Department of cryo-coolers for a wide range of applications.

PursuantHomeland Security (“DHS”) to a stock purchase agreementthe existing contract (the “SPA”“Prime Contract”), we acquired all between us and DHS on June 20, 2019. Unless terminated earlier by us, ComEd or DHS according to the terms of the issued and outstanding sharesSubcontract Agreement, the term of ITC (the “ITC Shares”) for a purchase price of approximately $3.8 million, consisting of $0.1 million in cash and 884,890 shares ofthe Subcontract Agreement will continue until we complete our common stock, par value $0.01 per share (the “AMSC Shares”).warranty obligations under the Subcontract Agreement. Under the terms of the SPA,Subcontract Agreement, we were obligatedagreed, among other things, to file a registration statement (the “Resale Registration Statement”) coveringprovide the resaleREG system and to supervise ComEd’s installation of the AMSC SharesREG system in Chicago. As part of our separate cost sharing arrangement with DHS under the Prime Contract, we received funding provided by certain selling stockholders (the “Selling Stockholders”) no later than 10 business days followingDHS in connection with the closingSubcontract Agreement of approximately $10.0 million, which represents the total amount of revenue we recognized over the term of the Acquisition,Subcontract Agreement and to use commercially reasonable efforts to cause the Resale Registration Statement to be declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) as soon as practicable thereafter. Additionally,includes $1.0 million that we have agreed to payreimburse ComEd for costs incurred by ComEd while undertaking its tasks under the Selling StockholdersSubcontract Agreement (the “Reimbursement Amount”). In addition, we are required to deliver an amount in cash (the “Make Whole Payment”), if any, equal to (x) an amount equal to (i) the price per AMSC Share pursuant to the termsirrevocable letter of the SPA, multiplied by (ii) the number of AMSC Shares sold by Selling Stockholders during the first 90 days after the effectiveness of the Resale Registration Statement, minus (y) the aggregate sales proceeds received by the Selling Stockholders from the sale of any AMSC Shares during the first 90 days after the effectiveness of the Resale Registration Statement. The Resale Registration Statement was declared effective on October 23, 2017. The contingent liability related to the Make Whole Payment was determined under a fair value option based pricing model to be $0.6 million on September 25, 2017 and was subsequently reassessed at each period end until the final amount of $0.7 million as of December 31, 2017 was determined according to the formula per the agreement. See Note 5 "Fair Value Measurements" and Note 12 "Warrants and Derivative Liabilities" for further discussion regarding the


valuation of this liability. On January 5, 2018 we issued the Make Whole Payment to the selling stockholderscredit in the amount of $0.7$5.0 million to secure certain Company obligations under the Subcontract Agreement, which we have done, and settleddeposited $5.0 million in an escrow account as collateral to secure such letter of credit.  ComEd has agreed to provide the contingent liability.
We valuedsite and provide all civil engineering work required to support the Acquisition at $4.2 million (excluding Acquisition costs), using a valueoperation and integration of $4.02 per share, which represents the closing price of our common stockREG system into ComEd’s electric grid. Other than the Reimbursement Amount, ComEd is responsible for its own costs and expenses. DHS’s approval to commence with construction was obtained on June 20, 2019. Substation work on the closing dateproject began in late 2019 and we successfully integrated the REG system on Com Ed's electric power grid and the REG system became fully operational in August 2021. 

24

The COVID-19 pandemic continues to rapidly evolve. We are experiencing substantial inflationary pressure in our supply chain, some delays in sourcing materials needed for our products and some production disruption resulting from higher than typical employee absenteeism which have increased our cost of revenues and decreased gross margin. The extent to which the Acquisition plus $0.1 million in cash and $0.6 million contingent consideration for the Make Whole Payment valued as of the closing date. As a result of this transaction, ITC became a wholly-owned subsidiary and was integrated intopandemic impacts our Grid business, unit.

Theliquidity, results of ITC's operations and financial condition will depend on future developments, which are includedhighly uncertain and cannot be predicted with confidence. Changes in our consolidated resultsmacroeconomic and our Grid segment reportingmarket conditions arising from the date of acquisition, September 25, 2017. AssumingCOVID-19 pandemic, or for other reasons, such as the Acquisition had occurred on April 1, 2017ongoing war between Russia and 2016, the impactUkraine, inflation, rising interest rates, labor force availability, sourcing, material delays and global supply chain disruptions could have a material adverse effect on our consolidatedbusiness, financial condition and results would not have been significant.
On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (“tax reform”) was signed into law. ASC Topic 740 requires deferred tax assets and liabilities to be measured using the enacted rate for the period in which they are expected to reverse. The tax reform was enacted as of December 22, 2017. Accordingly, the new 21% U.S. Federal corporate tax rate was used to measure the U.S. deferred tax assets and liabilities that will reverse in future periods. Our reduction to our net U.S. deferred tax asset was offset by a corresponding reduction to our valuation allowance. In addition, the new legislation includes a transition tax in which all foreign earnings are deemed to be repatriated to the U.S. and taxable at specified rates included within the tax reform. We are in the process of calculating the impact of the transition tax. The analysis is complex and encompasses many years. We are working with our foreign subsidiaries and their local tax service providers to gather historical information, including historical tax returns, in order to complete the calculation. Pursuant to Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118, our measurement period for the tax impact of the tax law changes is still open. At this time, we do not anticipate a material impact due to the transition tax, and we anticipate completing the accounting under ASC Topic 740 by March 31, 2018, at which time we expect to be in a position to book any required adjustments for any transition tax impact We do not anticipate any other material tax exposure due to the tax reform at this time.
operation.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The preparation of the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements requires that we make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. We base our estimates on historical experience and various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ under different assumptions or conditions. During the nine months ended December 31, 2017, we adopted ASU 2017-04, which provides for changes to the annual impairment testing of goodwill. See Note 4, "Acquisition and Related Goodwill" for further details. Aside from the adoption of ASU 2017-04, thereThere were no significant changes in the critical accounting policies that were disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal 2016, whichyear ended on March 31, 2017.

2022.

Results of Operations

Three and ninesix months ended December 31, 2017September 30, 2022, compared to the three and ninesix months ended December 31, 2016

September 30, 2021

Revenues

Total revenues decreased 45%1% to $27.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2022 and 41%total revenues decreased 6% to $14.9$50.4 million for the six months ended September 30, 2022, compared to $27.9 million and $34.9$53.3 million for the three and ninesix months ended December 31, 2017, respectively, compared to $27.1 million and $59.0 million for the three and nine months ended December 31, 2016,September 30, 2021, respectively. Our revenues are summarized as follows (in thousands):

 Three months ended December 31, Nine months ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2017 2016
Revenues:
 
    
  
Wind$2,633
 $18,248
 $10,465
 $36,822
Grid12,300
 8,900
 24,439
 22,178
Total$14,933
 $27,148
 $34,904
 $59,000

  

Three Months Ended September 30,

  

Six Months Ended September 30,

 
  

2022

  

2021

  

2022

  

2021

 

Revenues:

                

Grid

 $25,698  $24,619  $45,527  $48,119 

Wind

  1,982   3,289   4,833   5,209 

Total

 $27,680  $27,908  $50,360  $53,328 

Our WindGrid business unit accounted for 18%93% and 30%90% of total revenues for the three and ninesix months ended December 31, 2017,September 30, 2022, respectively, compared to 67% 88% and 62% 90% for the three and ninesix months ended December 31, 2016,September 30, 2021, respectively. Our Grid business unit revenues increased 4% to $25.7 million in the three months ended September 30, 2022, from $24.6 million in the three months ended September 30, 2021. Our Grid business unit revenues decreased 5% to $45.5 million in the six months ended September 30, 2022, from $48.1 million in the six months ended September 30, 2021. The increase in the Grid business unit revenue in the three months ended September 30, 2022, was primarily driven by higher NEPSI revenues than in the prior year period. The decrease in the Grid business unit revenue in the six months ended September 30, 2022, was primarily driven by lower D-VAR revenues than in the prior year period.

Our Wind business unit accounted for 7% and 10% of total revenues for the three and six months ended September 30, 2022, respectively, compared to 12% and 10% for the three and six months ended September 30, 2021, respectively. Revenues in the Wind business unit decreased 86%40% and 72%7% to $2.6$2.0 million and $10.5$4.8 million in the three and ninesix months ended December 31, 2017, respectively,September 30, 2022, from $18.2$3.3 million and $36.8$5.2 million in the three and ninesix months ended December 31, 2016,September 30, 2021, respectively.



Wind business unit revenues The decrease in the three months ended December 31, 2017 decreased dueSeptember 30, 2022, was driven by fewer royalty collections and shipments of electrical control systems ("ECS") to a lack of ECS shipments to Inox during the period, partially offset by increased license revenues. Wind business unit revenues in the nine months ended December 31, 2017 decreased primarily due to fewer shipments to Inox, partially offset by increased license revenues in the three month period as discussed above. We believe this reduction in demand has been caused by the transition in India from a local fixed tariff policy regime to a central and state government auction regime, which has had an adverse impact on the Wind industry in India. We cannot predict if and when this demand dislocation will be resolved.
Our Grid business unit accounted for 82% and 70% of total revenues for the three and nine months ended December 31, 2017, respectively, compared to 33% and 38% for the three and nine months ended December 31, 2016, respectively. Our Grid business unit revenues increased 38% and 10% to $12.3 million and $24.4 million in the three and nine months ended December 31, 2017, respectively, from $8.9 million and $22.2 million in the three and nine months ended December 31, 2016, respectively. Grid business unit revenues in the three months ended December 31, 2017 increased primarily due to higher D-VAR system revenues. Grid business unit revenuesSeptember 30, 2022. The decrease in the ninesix months ended December 31, 2017 increased primarily due to higher D-VAR system revenues,September 30, 2022 was driven by lower license and development revenue as well as higher revenue fromfewer royalty collections than in the U.S. Navy.   
The following table sets forth customers who represented 10% or more of our total revenues for the three and nine months ended December 31, 2017 and 2016:
 Three months ended December 31, Nine months ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2017 2016
Inox Wind Limited15% 66% 27% 58%
Vestas Middle East S.L.U.27% % 11% %
SSE Generation Ltd.17% % <10%
 %
Hidalgo Wind Farm LLC<10%
 17% <10%
 <10%
prior year period.

Cost of Revenues and Gross Margin

Cost of revenues decreased by 55% increased by 4% to $9.9$25.7 million for the three months ended December 31, 2017,September 30, 2022, compared to $22.1 million$24.6 for the three monthsmonths ended December 31, 2016. Gross margin was 34% for the three months ended December 31, 2017, compared to 19% for the three months ended December 31, 2016. The increase in the gross margin for the three months ended December 31, 2017 was due to increased royalty revenue and a more favorable product mix in the current year period.

September 30, 2021. Cost of revenues decreased by 33%1% to $34.1$46.2 million for the ninesix months ended December 31, 2017,September 30, 2022, compared to $51.0$46.7 million for the ninesix months ended December 31, 2016.September 30, 2021. Gross margin was 2%7% and 8% for the ninethree and six months ended December 31, 2017,September 30, 2022, respectively compared to 14%12% and 13% for the ninethree and six months ended December 31, 2016.September 30, 2021.  The decrease in the gross margin for the nine months ended December 31, 2017 was due primarily to the reduction in demand from Inox as discussed above.
Operating Expenses
Research and development
R&D expenses decreased in three and nine months ended December 31, 2017 by 1% to $3.0 million and $8.7 million from $3.0 million and $8.8 million for the three and ninesix months ended December 31, 2016.September 30, 2022was due to lower revenues, an unfavorable product mix and inflation pressure in our supply chain.


Operating Expenses

Research and development

Research and development ("R&D") expense decreased 13% in each of the three and six months ended September 30, 2022, to $2.3 million from $2.7 million in the three months ended September 30, 2021, and to $5.0 million from $5.7 million in the six months ended September 30, 2021. The decrease in R&D expensesexpense was due to an increase in cost share revenues and a higher utilization of our research engineers supporting funded projects. 

Selling, general, and administrative

Selling, general and administrative ("SG&A") expenses increased 10% in the three and nine months ended December 31, 2017 as compared September 30, 2022to the prior year periods was primarily due to reduced compensation expense.


Selling, general, and administrative
SG&A expenses decreased by 10% and 14% to $5.5$7.3 million and $17.0from $6.7 million in the three and nine months ended December 31, 2017, from $6.1 million and $19.6September 30, 2021. The increase in SG&A expense in the three months ended September 30, 2022, was due to higher overall compensation expense than in the prior year period. SG&A expenses increased 8% to $14.9 million in the three and ninesix months ended December 31, 2016.September 30, 2022, compared to $13.8 million in the six months ended September 30, 2021. The decreasesincrease in SG&A expensesexpense in the three and ninesix months ended December 31, 2017 wereSeptember 30, 2022, was due primarily to reducedhigher overall compensation expense andthan in the reduced use of outside service providers.

prior year period. 

Amortization of acquisition related intangibles

We recorded amortization expense related to our core technology and know-how, trade namescustomer relationships, and trademarkother intangible assets of less than $0.1 million in each of the three months ended December 31, 2017 and 2016. We recorded amortization expense related to our core technology and know-how, trade names and trademark intangible assets of less than $0.1$0.7 million and $0.1$1.4 million in the ninethree and six months ended December 31, 2017September 30, 2022, respectively, and 2016,$0.6 million and $1.2 million in the three and six months ended September 30, 2021, respectively.




The increase in amortization expense is a result of additional expense tied to the acquisition of Neeltran.

Change in fair value of contingent consideration

The change in fair value of our contingent consideration for the Make Whole Paymentearnout payment on the ITCNEPSI Acquisition resulted in a lossgain of $0.3 million and $0.1 million in the three and ninesix months ended December 31, 2017.September 30, 2022, respectively, compared to a gain of $2.4 million and $2.3 million in the three and six months ended September 30, 2021, respectively. The change in the fair value was primarily driven by the change in stock price, which is a key valuation metric.

Restructuring
We recordeddecreased likelihood of achieving certain revenue targets and a restructuring charge of $1.3 million for severance costsdecline in the nine months ended December 31, 2017 as a result of the reduction in force announced on April 4, 2017. Included in the $1.3 million severance pay, charged to operations in the nine months ended December 31, 2017, is $0.5 million of severance pay for one of our former executive officers pursuant to the terms of a severance agreement dated June 30, 2017. Under the terms of the severance agreement, our former executive officer is entitled to eighteen months of his base salary, which is expected to be paid by December 31, 2018. From and after January 1, 2018, at our discretion, we may settle any remaining unpaid cash severance owed to our former executive officer through the issuance of a number of immediately vested shares of our commonCompany's stock determined by multiplying the remaining unpaid cash severance owed by 120%, and then dividing by the closing stock price per share of our common stock as of the last business day prior to the issuance of the shares.

price.

Operating loss

Our operating loss is summarized as follows (in thousands):

 Three months ended December 31, Nine months ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2017 2016
Operating loss:       
Wind$(1,684) $1,044
 $(7,557) $(3,220)
Grid(1,011) (4,491) (15,279) (15,068)
Unallocated corporate expenses(1,156) (613) (3,514) (2,266)
Total$(3,851) $(4,060) $(26,350) $(20,554)

  

Three Months Ended September 30,

  

Six Months Ended September 30,

 
  

2022

  

2021

  

2022

  

2021

 

Operating loss:

                

Grid

 $(6,495) $(5,836) $(13,776) $(11,180)

Wind

  (868)  205   (1,254)  (558)

Unallocated corporate expenses

  (729)  1,329   (1,931)  (63)

Total

 $(8,092) $(4,302) $(16,961) $(11,801)

Our WindGrid business segment generated operating losses of $1.7$6.5 million and $7.6$13.8 million in the three and nine monthssix months ended December 31, 2017, respectively,September 30, 2022, compared to a profit of $1.0$5.8 million and loss of $3.2$11.2 million in the three and ninesix months ended December 31, 2016, respectively. September 30, 2021The increase in the Wind business unit operating losses in the three months ended December 31, 2017 was due primarily to a lack of ECS shipments to Inox, offset partially by increased license revenue as previously discussed. The increase in the Wind business unit operating loss in the nine months ended December 31, 2017 was due primarily to fewer ECS shipments to Inox, partially offset by increased license revenue, as previously discussed.

Our Grid segment generated operating losses of $1.0 million and $15.3 million in the three and nine months ended December 31, 2017, respectively, compared to $4.5 million and $15.1 million in the three and nine months ended December 31, 2016, respectively. The decrease in the Grid business unit operating loss in the three months ended December 31, 2017September 30, 2022, was due primarily to increased D-VAR revenues comparedlower gross margins due to the prior year period.an unfavorable product mix, and higher operating expenses. The increase in Gridthe grid business unit operating loss in the ninesix months ended December 31, 2017September 30, 2022 was due primarily to $4.1lower revenues and gross margins due to an unfavorable product mix, and higher operating expenses.

Our Wind business segment generated operating losses of $0.9 million and $1.3 million in the three and six months ended September 30, 2022, compared to an operating profit of accelerated depreciation related$0.2 million and an operating loss of $0.6 million in the three and six months ended September 30, 2021, respectively. The increase in the Wind business unit operating loss was due to revised estimates of the useful lives of certain pieces of manufacturing equipment.

lower revenues and gross margins, and higher operating expenses.

Unallocated corporate expenses primarily consist of stock-based compensation expense of $0.9 million and $2.1 million for the three and nine months ended December 31, 2017, respectively, and $0.6 million and $2.3 million in the three and nine months ended December 31, 2016, respectively. Additionally,included a restructuring charge of $1.3 million, primarily for severance costs as a result of the restructuring action announcedgain on April 4, 2017, is included in unallocated corporate expenses for the nine months ended December 31, 2017, as well as lossescontingent consideration of $0.3 million and $0.1 million for the change in fair value of the contingent consideration in the three and ninesix months ended December 31, 2017, respectively.

Change in fair valueSeptember 30, 2022. Additionally, unallocated corporate expenses primarily consisted of warrants
The change in fair valuestock-based compensation expense of warrants resulted in gains of $0.4$1.0 million and $1.5$1.1 million in the three and nine months ended December 31, 2017,September 30, 2022 and 2021, respectively, compared to gains of $0.1and $2.1 million and $0.7$2.4 million in the six months ended September 30, 2022 and 2021, respectively.


Interest income, net

Interest income, net, was less than $0.1 million in both the three and ninesix months ended



December 31, 2016,September 30, 2022 and September 30, 2021, respectively. The change in the fair value

China dissolution

              China dissolution, was primarily driven by changes in stock price, which is a key valuation metric.
Interest income (expense), net
Interest income (expense), net, was income of     less than $0.1 $1.9 million in each of the  three and ninesix months ended December 31, 2017,September 30, 2022, respectively, compared to expenseno activity in each of $0.1 millionthe three and $0.3six months ended September 30, 2021 . The increase in China dissolution during the three and six months ended September 30, 2022, was driven by the liquidation of our China entity, resulting in a foreign currency gain/loss from the cumulative translation release of $1.9 million in the three and ninesix months ended December 31, 2016, respectively. The decreaseSeptember 30, 2022 in interest expensewhich there was related to lower interest due tono similar transaction in the maturity of both of our term loans with Hercules Technology Growth Capital, Inc. (“Hercules”). Our Term Loan B matured in November 2016,three and our Term Loan C matured in June 2017.six months ended September 30, 2021.

Other (expense) income (expense), net

Other (expense) income, net, was expense of $0.3 $0.1 million and $2.4$0.2 million in the three and ninesix months ended December 31, 2017,September 30, 2022, respectively, compared to other income, net, of $0.9less than $0.1 million in the three months ended September 30, 2021 and other expense, net of less than $0.1 million in the six months ended September 30, 2021. The decrease in other expense during the three and six months ended September 30, 2022, was driven by the impacts of favorable fluctuations in foreign currencies during the respective period.

 Income Taxes

Income tax benefit was less than $0.1 million in the three months ended September 30, 2022 and income tax expense was less than $0.1 million in the six months ended September 30, 2022. Income tax expense was $0.2 million in the three months ended September 30, 2021 and income tax benefit was $1.9 million in the six months ended September 30, 2021. The increase in income tax benefit in the three months ended September 30, 2022 compared to the same period in fiscal 2021 was primarily due to lower withholding taxes from foreign jurisdictions in the three months ended September 30, 2022. The increase in income tax expense in the six months ended September 30, 2022 compared to the same period in fiscal 2021 was a result of the release of the valuation allowance to offset the recording of the deferred tax liability from the Neeltran Acquisition in the six months ended September 30, 2021. 

Net loss

Net loss was $9.9 million and $0.5$18.6 million in the three and six months ended September 30, 2022, compared to $4.4 million and $9.8 million in the three and ninesix months ended December 31, 2016, respectively.September 30, 2021. The increase in other expense, net duringloss was driven primarily by the three and nine months ended December 31, 2017, was primarily driven by higher foreign currency losses.  

Income Taxes
Income tax expense was $0.6 million and $0.5 million in the three and nine months ended December 31, 2017, respectively, compared to income tax benefit of $0.1 million and expense of $1.0 million in the three and nine months ended December 31, 2016, respectively. The decrease in income tax expense during the nine months ended December 31, 2017 was primarilyincreased operating loss due to the release of valuation allowances of $1.1 million in the nine months ended December 31, 2017 as a result of the deferred tax liability purchase adjustment recorded as a result of the ITC Acquisition, for the difference in tax basis on the ITC net assets acquired.
lower revenues and gross margins.

Non-GAAP Measures

Financial Measure - Non-GAAP Net Loss

Generally, a non-GAAP financial measure is a numerical measure of a company’s performance, financial position or cash flow that either excludes or includes amounts that are not normally excluded or included in the most directly comparable measure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP. The non-GAAP measures included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, however, should be considered in addition to, and not as a substitute for or superior to the comparable measuremeasures prepared in accordance with GAAP.

We define non-GAAP net loss as net loss before sale of minority investments,China dissolution, stock-based compensation, amortization of acquisition-related intangibles, consumption of zero cost-basis inventory, changesacquisition costs, change in fair value of warrants and contingent consideration, non-cash interest expense, tax effect of adjustments, and the other non-cash or unusual charges, indicated in the table below.charges.  We believe non-GAAP net loss assists management and investors in comparing our performance across reporting periods on a consistent basis by excluding these non-cash or non-recurring charges and other items that we do not believe are indicative of our core operating performance. In addition, we use non-GAAP net loss as a factor to evaluate the effectiveness of our business strategies. A reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP net loss is set forth in the table below (in thousands, except per share data):




 Three months ended December 31, Nine months ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2017 2016
Net loss$(4,248) $(2,768) $(26,782) $(20,448)
Sale of minority investments
 (325) (951) (325)
Stock-based compensation883
 613
 2,115
 2,266
Amortization of acquisition-related intangibles85
 39
 98
 118
Consumption of zero cost-basis inventory(118) (478) (514) (1,118)
Change in fair value of warrants and contingent consideration(126) (101) (1,397) (667)
Non-cash interest expense
 30
 19
 127
Tax effect of adjustments19
 77
 142
 179
Non-GAAP net loss$(3,505) $(2,913) $(27,270) $(19,868)
        
Non-GAAP net loss per share$(0.18) $(0.21) $(1.46) $(1.45)
Weighted average shares outstanding - basic and diluted19,949
 13,792
 18,614
 13,746

  

Three Months Ended September 30,

  

Six Months Ended September 30,

 
  

2022

  

2021

  

2022

  

2021

 

Net loss

 $(9,881) $(4,434) $(18,590) $(9,837)

China dissolution

  1,921      1,921    

Stock-based compensation

  1,019   1,100   2,052   2,393 

Amortization of acquisition-related intangibles

  688   668   1,400   1,289 

Acquisition costs

     (7)     (2,330)

Change in fair value of contingent consideration

  (290)  (2,430)  (120)  681 

Non-GAAP net loss

 $(6,542) $(5,103) $(13,337) $(7,804)
                 

Non-GAAP net loss per share - basic

 $(0.23) $(0.19) $(0.48) $(0.29)

Weighted average shares outstanding - basic

  27,867   27,252   27,714   27,040 

We incurred non-GAAP net losses of $3.5$6.5 million and $13.3 million, or $0.18 per share,$0.23 and $27.3 million or $1.46$0.48 per share, for the three and ninesix months ended December 31, 2017,September 30, 2022, compared to non-GAAP net losses of $2.9$5.1 million and $7.8 million, or $0.21 per share,$0.19 and $19.9 million or $1.45$0.29 per share, for the three and ninesix months ended December 31, 2016. September 30, 2021. The increasesincrease in the non-GAAP net loss in bothfor the three and nine month period ended December 31, 2017 were driven primarily by an increase in net loss, as previously discussed, and an adjustment for the sale of our minority investment in Blade Dynamics Limited, partially offset by decreased consumption of zero cost basis inventory and the gain resulting from the decreased value of the warrants and contingent consideration on the ITC acquisition in the three and ninesix months ended December 31, 2017.September 30, 2022 was due to a higher operating loss driven by lower gross margin and higher operating expenses.  


Liquidity and Capital Resources

We have experienced recurring operating losses and, as of December 31, 2017September 30, 2022, had an accumulated deficit of $982.3 million. In addition, we have experienced recurring negative operating cash flows and our Wind segment revenues decreased substantially in the nine months ended December 31, 2017 compared to the prior year period due to decreased demand from Inox. We cannot predict if and when this demand dislocation will be resolved. From April 1, 2011 through the date of this filing, we have reduced our global workforce substantially, including an 8% reduction in force, primarily affecting employees in our Devens, Massachusetts facility, effective April 4, 2017. We incurred restructuring charges of $1.3 million in cash severance expenses in the nine months ended December 31, 2017 in connection with the workforce reduction. We are currently moving our manufacturing and administrative operations from our facility in Devens, Massachusetts to a nearby, smaller-scale leased building in Ayer, Massachusetts, which is anticipated to reduce operating costs.

$1,039 million.

Our cash requirements depend on numerous factors, including if and when the Inox demand dislocation is resolved, the successful completion of our product development activities, our ability to commercialize our Resilient Electric Grid (“REG”)REG and ship protection system solutions, the rate of customer and market adoption of our products, collecting receivables according to established terms, and the continued availability of U.S. government funding during the product development phase of our Superconductors-based products.

superconductor-based products and whether Inox is successful in executing on Solar Energy Corporation of India Limited orders or in obtaining additional orders under the new central and state auction regime. We continue to closely monitor our expenses and, if required, expect to reduce our operating and capital spending to enhance liquidity.

In February 2021, we filed a shelf registration statement on Form S-3 that will expire in February 2024 (the “Form S-3”). The Form S-3 allows us to offer and sell from time-to-time up to $250 million of common stock, debt securities, warrants or units comprised of any combination of these securities. The Form S-3 is intended to provide us flexibility to conduct registered sales of our securities, subject to market conditions, in order to fund our future capital needs. The terms of any future offering under the Form S-3 will be established at the time of such offering and will be described in a prospectus supplement filed with the SEC prior to the completion of any such offering.

As of December 31, 2017,September 30, 2022, we had cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash of $22.3$37.4 million, compared to $27.7$49.5 million as of March 31, 2017,2022, a decrease of $5.5$12.1 million. As of September 30, 2022, we had approximately $1.9 million of cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash in foreign bank accounts. Our cash, and cash equivalents, and restricted cash are summarized as follows (in thousands):

 December 31, 2017 
March 31,
2017
Cash and cash equivalents$22,113
 $26,784
Restricted cash165
 960
Total cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash$22,278
 $27,744

As of December 31, 2017, we had approximately $1.4 million of cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash in foreign bank accounts, with a majority of this cash located in Europe.


  

September 30, 2022

  

March 31, 2022

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 $27,811  $40,584 

Restricted cash

  9,542   8,902 

Total cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash

 $37,354  $49,486 

For the ninesix months ended December 31, 2017,September 30, 2022, net cash used in operating activities was $20.2$11.6 million, compared to $10.5$11.7 million of cash used for the ninesix months ended December 31, 2016. September 30, 2021.  The increasedecrease in net cash used in operations was due primarily to an increased operating loss, and less cash collections from Inox, partiallyincrease in inventory purchases offset by usage of inventory.

accounts receivable collections in the six months ended September 30, 2022 as compared to September 30, 2021.

For the ninesix months ended December 31, 2017,September 30, 2022, net cash used in investing activities was $0.3$0.7 million, compared to net cash provided by investing activities of $0.4$6.8 million for the ninesix months ended December 31, 2016.ended September 30, 2021. The increasedecrease in net cash used in investing activities was due primarily to increased purchases of property, plant and equipment relateddue to the Devens facility move, partially offset by proceeds received fromcash that was used to pay for the final payment due from Blade Dynamics as well as releases of restricted cashNeeltran Acquisition in the ninesix months ended December 31, 2017.  

September 30, 2021. There was no such transaction in the six months ended September 30, 2022. 

For the ninesix months ended December 31, 2017,September 30, 2022 and 2021, respectively, net cash provided by financing activities was $15.2 million compared to net cash used in financing activities of $3.7 million in the nine months ended December 31, 2016. The increase in net cash provided by financing activities was primarily due to net proceeds of $17.0 million from the issuance of 4.6 million shares of common stock in May 2017, with no such equity offering in the prior year period.  See the discussion regarding the May 2017 equity offering below. 

remained consistent at less than $0.1 million.  

As of December 31, 2017,September 30, 2022, we had $0.2$6.0 million of restricted cash included in long-term assets and $3.6 million of restricted cash included in current assets.  These amounts included inof restricted cash primarily represent deposits to secure letters of credit for various supply contracts.contracts and long-term projects, including the irrevocable letter of credit in the amount of $5.0 million to secure certain of our obligations under the Subcontract Agreement with ComEd. These deposits are held in interest bearing accounts.

On December 19, 2014, we amended

We are a party to many contractual obligations involving commitments to make payments to third parties. These obligations impact our Loanshort-term and Security Agreement (the "Term Loan") with Herculeslong-term liquidity and entered into a new term loan (the “Term Loan C”), borrowing $1.5 million (our prior $10.0 million term loan with Hercules was repaid in full at maturity on November 1, 2016).  After closing fees and expenses, the net proceeds from the Term Loan C were $1.4 million.  We made interest only paymentscapital resource needs. Certain contractual obligations are reflected on the Term Loan C until maturity on June 1, 2017, when the loan was repaid in its entirety.

On May 5, 2017,consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2022, while others are considered future commitments. We have various contractual arrangements, under which we entered into an underwriting agreement relating to the issuance and sale (the "Offering") of up to 4.0 million shares of our common stock at a public offering price of $4.00 per share and granted a 30-day option (the "Option") to the underwritershave committed to purchase upcertain minimum quantities of goods or services on an annual basis. For information regarding our other contractual obligations, refer to an additional 600,000 shares of common stock at the public offering price. The net proceedsNote 13, "Contingent Consideration," Note 14, "Debt," Note 15, "Leases" and Note 16, "Commitments and Contingencies" to us from the Offering were approximately $14.7 million, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and offering expenses payable by us. On May 24, 2017, the underwriters notified us that they had exercisedour condensed consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in full their Option to purchase an additional 600,000 shares of common stock in connection with the Offering. The net proceeds to us from the Option were approximately $2.3 million, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and offering expenses payable by us. The total net proceeds to us during the three months ended June 30, 2017 from the Offering and Option were approximately $17.0 million, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and offering expenses payable by us. The Company terminated its At Market Issuance Sales Agreement with FBR Capital Markets & Co in conjunction with the Offering. In addition, in December 2015, we entered into a set of strategic agreements valued at approximately $210.0 million with Inox.
this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

We believe we have sufficient available liquidity to fund our operations and capital expenditures for the next twelve months. In addition, we may seek to raise additional capital, which could be in the form of loans, convertible debt or equity, to fund our operating requirements and capital expenditures. Our liquidity is highly dependent on our ability to increase revenues, improve upon gross margins, control our operating costs, and our ability to raise additional capital, if necessary. There can be no assurance that we will be able to raise additional capital on favorable terms or at all, or execute on any other means of improving our liquidity as described above.  Additionally, the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and adverse macroeconomic conditions on the global financial markets may reduce our ability to raise additional capital, if necessary, which could negatively impact our liquidity.


Legal Proceedings

We are involved in legal and administrative proceedings and claims of various types. See Part II, Item 1, “Legal Proceedings,” for additional information. We record a liability in our consolidated financial statements for these matters when a loss is known or considered probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated. We review these estimates each accounting period as additional information is known and adjust the loss provision when appropriate. If a matter is both probable to result in liability and the amounts of loss can be reasonably estimated, we estimate and disclose the possible loss or range of loss to the extent necessary to make the consolidated financial statements not misleading. If the loss is not probable or cannot be reasonably estimated, a liability is not recorded in our consolidated financial statements.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements, as defined under SEC rules, such as relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, which are often referred to as structured finance or special purpose entities, established for the purpose of facilitating transactions that are not required to be reflected on our balance sheet except as discussed below.


We occasionally enter into construction contracts that include a performance bond. As these contracts progress, we continually assess the probability of a payout from the performance bond. Should we determine that such a payout is probable, we would record a liability.
In addition, we have various contractual arrangements in which minimum quantities of goods or services have been committed to be purchased on an annual basis.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) and the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606). The guidance substantially converges final standards on revenue recognition between the FASB and IASB providing a framework on addressing revenue recognition issues and, upon its effective date, replaces almost all existing revenue recognition guidance, including industry-specific guidance, in current U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The FASB has subsequently issued the following amendments to ASU 2014-09 which are all effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017.
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-08, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent Considerations, which clarifies the implementation guidance on principal versus agent considerations.
In April 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-10, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing, which clarifies certain aspects of identifying performance obligations and licensing implementation guidance.
In May 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-12, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Narrow- Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients related to disclosures of remaining performance obligations, as well as other amendments to guidance on collectability, non-cash consideration and the presentation of sales and other similar taxes collected from customers.
In December 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-20, Technical Corrections and Improvements to Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which amends certain narrow aspects of the guidance issued in ASU 2014-09 including guidance related to the disclosure of remaining performance obligations and prior-period performance obligations, as well as other amendments to the guidance on loan guarantee fees, contract costs, refund liabilities, advertising costs and the clarification of certain examples.
As of December 31, 2017, we have made significant progress towards completing our assessment of the potential effects of ASU 2049-09 and its amendments on our consolidated financial statements, and are actively assessing the potential effects on business processes, systems and controls to support revenue recognition and the related disclosures under this ASU. Our assessment includes a detailed review of representative contracts from each of our revenue streams and a comparison of its historical accounting policies and practices to the new standard. We are required to adopt the new standards on April 1, 2018, and expect to do so retrospectively with the cumulative effect of initially applying the guidance recognized at the date of initial application (the modified retrospective transition method). Additionally, this guidance could lead to recognizing certain revenue transactions sooner than in the past on certain contracts, as we will need to estimate the revenue we will be entitled to upon contract completion, and later on other contracts, due to lack of an enforceable right to payment for performance obligations satisfied over time. Our preliminary assessment of this adoption method supports the determination that there are no expected changes in the accounting for our largest revenue stream which includes Inox Wind Limited as the primary customer. Across other revenue streams the timing of revenue recognition could be affected for multiple types of contracts, primarily multiple element contracts in our grid business unit, but those differences are not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements. However, our assessment is not yet finalized and is subject to change. Additionally, we are currently evaluating any tax implications the adoption of this new standard may have on the consolidated financial statements. As part of this analysis, we are evaluating our information technology capabilities and systems, and do not expect to incur significant information technology costs to modify systems currently in place.
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017 we plan to assess our current revenue controls, and identify and implement any changes that may be necessary to comply with our new revenue policies and the provisions of ASU 2014-09, which will be effective for us as of April 1, 2018.
In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, Financial Instruments-Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities.  The amendments in ASU 2016-01 enhance the reporting model for financial instruments to provide users of financial statements with more decision-useful information. This ASU is effective for


annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years.  We do not expect any significant changes to the consolidated financial statement results with the adoption of ASU 2016-01.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842). The guidance in this ASU supersedes the leasing guidance in Topic 840, Leases. Under the new guidance, lessees are required to recognize lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet for all leases with terms longer than 12 months. Leases will be classified as either finance or operating, with classification affecting the pattern of expense recognition in the income statement. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years. A modified retrospective transition approach is required for lessees for capital and operating leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements, with certain practical expedients available. We are currently evaluating the effects adoption of this guidance will have on our consolidated financial statements.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments. The amendments in ASU 2016-13 will provide more decision-useful information about the expected credit losses on financial instruments and other commitments to extend credit held by a reporting entity at each reporting date. TheFollowing the release of ASU is2019-10 in November 2019, the new effective fordate, as long as we remain a smaller reporting company, would be annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim2022. We have evaluated the impact of the adoption of ASU 2016-13, and do not expect it to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In October 2021, the FASB issued ASU 2021-08, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Accounting for Contract Assets and Contract Liabilities from Contracts with Customers. The amendments in ASU 2021-08 will improve the accounting for acquired revenue contracts with customers in a business combination. Following the release of ASU 2021-08 in October 2021, the new effective date will be annual reporting periods within that year.beginning after December 15, 2022. We are currently evaluating the impact, if any, that the adoption of ASU 2016-132021-08 may have on our consolidated financial statements.

In 2016,November 2021, the FASB issued ASU 2021-10, Government Assistance (Topic 832): Disclosures by Business Entities about Government Assistance. The amendments in ASU 2021-10 improve financial reporting by requiring disclosures that increase the following two ASU's on Statementtransparency of Cash Flows (Topic 230). Both amendments aretransactions with government accounted for by applying a grant or contribution accounting model by analogy. Following the release of ASU 2021-10 in November 2021, the effective fordate was annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within that year.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Statement2021. As of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments. The amendments in ASU 2016-15 provide more guidance towards the classification of multiple different types of cash flows in order to reduce the diversity in reporting across entities.
In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash. The amendments in ASU 2016-18 explain the change during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. Therefore, amounts generally described as restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents should be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts shown on the statement of cash flows.
We do not expect any significant changes to the consolidated financial statement results with the adoption of ASU 2016-15 and ASU 2016-18.
In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-16, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory. The amendments in ASU 2016-16 improve the accounting for the income tax consequences of intra-entity transfers of assets other than inventory. The ASU is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within that year.  We do not anticipate any significant changes to our consolidated financial statements with the adoption of ASU 2016-16.
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-01, Business Combinations. The amendments in ASU 2017-01 clarify the definition of a business with the objective of adding guidance to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. The ASU is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those periods.  WeApril 1, 2022, we have adopted ASU 2017-01 effective September 30, 2017, following the acquisition of ITC. We considered these amendments in our decision to record the combination of the entities as an Acquisition. See Note 4, "Acquisitions2021-10 and Related Goodwill", for further details. These impacts have been included in the consolidated financial statements.
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-03, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections (Topic 250) and Investments - Equity Method and Joint Ventures. The amendments in ASU 2017-03 provide additional detail surrounding disclosures required related to adoption of new pronouncements. The ASU is effective for the periods of each related pronouncement.  We are currently evaluating thenoted no material impact the adoption of ASU 2017-03 may have on our consolidated financial statements.
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment. The amendments in ASU 2017-04 eliminated the prior requirement to perform procedures to determine the fair value at the impairment testing date of an entity's assets and liabilities (including unrecognized assets and liabilities) following the procedure that would be required in determining the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination. Under the new guidelines an entity should perform its annual, or interim, goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount. An entity should recognize an impairment charge for the amount by


which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value. The ASU is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted for interim or annual goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017. Following the Acquisition of ITC, we performed an analysis and determined that the transaction included a portion of goodwill. We have accounted for that value on our balance sheet as of December 31, 2017. See Note 4, "Acquisitions and Related Goodwill" for further details. Given the results of our analysis, we adopted ASU 2017-04 effective September 30, 2017, and determined there were no triggering events requiring further impairment analysis at this time. The Company expects to perform its annual impairment test during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017.
In February 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-05, Other Income - Gains and Losses from the Derecognition of Non-financial Assets (Subtopic 610-20). The amendments in ASU 2017-05 clarify the scope of Subtopic 610-20, Other Income-Gains and Losses from the Derecognition of Non-financial Assets, and to add guidance for partial sales of non-financial assets. Subtopic 610-20, which was issued in May 2014 as a part of Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), provides guidance for recognizing gains and losses from the transfer of non-financial assets in contracts with non-customers.  We do not expect any significant changes to the consolidated financial statement results with the adoption of ASU 2017-05.
In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-09, Compensation - Stock Compensation (Subtopic 718) Scope of Modification Accounting. The amendments in ASU 2017-09 provide clarity and reduce both (1) diversity in practice and (2) cost and complexity when applying the guidance in Topic 718, Compensation—Stock Compensation, to a change to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award.  The ASU is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those periods. We do not expect any significant changes to the consolidated financial statement results with the adoption of ASU 2017-09.
In July 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-11, Earnings per Share (Topic 260), Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity (Topic 480), and Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815). The amendments in ASU 2017-11 provide guidance for freestanding equity-linked financial instruments, such as warrants and conversion options in convertible debt or preferred stock, and should no longer be accounted for as a derivative liability at fair value as a result of the existence of a down round feature. The ASU is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those periods. We are currently evaluating the impact the adoption of ASU 2017-11 may have on our consolidated financial statements.
In August 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-12, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities. The amendments in ASU 2017-12 provide improved financial reporting of hedging relationships to better portray the economic results of an entity’s risk management activities in its financial statements. In addition, the amendments in this update make certain targeted improvements to simplify the application of the hedge accounting guidance. The ASU is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those periods. We are currently evaluating the impact the adoption of ASU 2017-12 may have on our consolidated financial statements.

We do not believe that, outside of those disclosed here, there are any other recently issued accounting pronouncements that will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.


ITEM 3.

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

We face exposure to financial market risks such as adverse movements in foreign currency exchange rates. These exposures may change over time as our business practices evolve and could have a material adverse impact on our financial results. Our market risk profile as of December 31, 2017 has not materially changed since March 31, 2017. Our market risk profile as of March 31, 2017 is disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017, filed with the SEC on May 25, 2017.

Not Applicable

ITEM 4.

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2017.September 30, 2022. The term “disclosure controls and procedures,” as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act, means controls and other procedures of a company that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the



Company’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives and management necessarily applies its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. Based on thatthe evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2017,September 30, 2022, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of such date, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There were no changes into our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the quarter ended December 31, 2017September 30, 2022 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.


PART II—OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

On September 13, 2011, we commenced a series of legal actions in China against Sinovel. Our Chinese subsidiary, Suzhou AMSC Superconductor Co. Ltd., filed a claim for arbitration with the Beijing Arbitration Commission in accordance with the terms of our supply contracts with Sinovel. The case is captioned (2011) Jing Zhong An Zi No. 0963. On March 31, 2011, Sinovel refused to accept contracted shipments of 1.5 MW and 3 MW wind turbine core electrical components and spare parts that we were prepared to deliver. We allege that these actions constitute material breaches of our contracts because Sinovel did not give us notice that it intended to delay deliveries as required under the contracts. Moreover, we allege that Sinovel has refused to pay past due amounts for prior shipments of core electrical components and spare parts. We are seeking compensation for past product shipments and retention (including interest) in the amount of approximately RMB 485 million (approximately $75 million) due to Sinovel’s breaches of our contracts. We are also seeking specific performance of our existing contracts as well as reimbursement of all costs and reasonable expenses with respect to the arbitration. The value of the undelivered components under the existing contracts, including the deliveries refused by Sinovel in March 2011, amounts to approximately RMB 4.6 billion (approximately $707 million).
On October 8, 2011, Sinovel filed with the Beijing Arbitration Commission an application under the caption (2011) Jing Zhong An Zi No. 0963, for a counterclaim against us for breach of the same contracts under which we filed our original arbitration claim. Sinovel claims, among other things, that the goods supplied by us do not conform to the standards specified in the contracts and claims damages in the amount of approximately RMB 370 million (approximately $57 million). On October 17, 2011, Sinovel filed with the Beijing Arbitration Commission a request for change of counterclaim to increase its damage claim to approximately RMB 1 billion (approximately $154 million). On December 22, 2011, Sinovel filed with the Beijing Arbitration Commission an additional request for change of counterclaim to increase its damages claim to approximately RMB 1.2 billion (approximately $184 million). On February 27, 2012, Sinovel filed with the Beijing Arbitration Commission an application under the caption (2012) Jing Zhong An Zi No. 0157, against us for breach of the same contracts under which we filed our original arbitration claim. Sinovel claims, among other things, that the goods supplied by us do not conform to the standards specified in the contracts and claims damages in the amount of approximately RMB 105 million (approximately $16 million). We believe that Sinovel’s claims are without merit and we intend to defend these actions vigorously. Since the proceedings in this matter are still in the early technical review phase, we cannot reasonably estimate possible losses or range of losses at this time.
We also submitted a civil action application to the Beijing No. 1 Intermediate People’s Court under the caption (2011) Yi Zhong Min Chu Zi No. 15524, against Sinovel for software copyright infringement on September 13, 2011. The application alleges Sinovel’s unauthorized use of portions of our wind turbine control software source code developed for Sinovel’s 1.5MW wind turbines and the binary code, or upper layer, of our software for the PM3000 power converters in 1.5MW wind turbines. In July 2011, a former employee of our Austrian subsidiary was arrested in Austria on charges of economic espionage and fraudulent manipulation of data. In September 2011, the former employee pled guilty to the charges, and was imprisoned. As a result of our internal investigation and a criminal investigation conducted by Austrian authorities, we believe that this former employee was contracted by Sinovel through an intermediary while employed by us and improperly obtained and transferred to Sinovel portions of our wind turbine control software source code developed for Sinovel’s 1.5MW wind turbines. Moreover, we believe the former employee illegally used source code to develop for Sinovel a software modification to circumvent the encryption and remove technical protection measures on the PM3000 power converters in 1.5MW wind turbines in the field. We are seeking a cease and desist order with respect to the unauthorized copying, installation and use of our software, monetary damages of approximately RMB 38 million (approximately $6 million) for our economic losses and reimbursement of all costs and reasonable expenses. The Beijing No. 1 Intermediate People’s Court accepted the case, which was necessary in order for the case to proceed. On September 15, 2014, the Beijing No. 1 Intermediate People’s Court held its first substantive hearing in the Beijing case.  At the hearing, the parties presented evidence, reviewed claims, and answered questions from the court.  On April 24, 2015, we received notification


from the Beijing No. 1 Intermediate People’s Court that it dismissed the case for what it cited was a lack of evidence.  On May 6, 2015, we filed an appeal of the Beijing No. 1 Intermediate People’s Court decision to dismiss the case with the Beijing Higher People’s Court.  On September 8, 2015, the Beijing Higher People’s Court held its first substantive hearing on our appeal of the Beijing No. 1 Intermediate People’s Court’s dismissal of the case.  At the hearing, the parties presented evidence and answered questions from the court.  We are awaiting a decision from the Beijing Higher People’s Court.
We submitted a civil action application to the Beijing Higher People’s Court against Sinovel and certain of its employees for trade secret infringement on September 13, 2011 under the caption (2011) Gao Min Chu Zi No. 4193. The application alleges the defendants’ unauthorized use of portions of our wind turbine control software source code developed for Sinovel’s 1.5MW wind turbines as described above with respect to the Copyright Action. We are seeking monetary damages of approximately RMB 2.9 billion (approximately $446 million) for the trade secret infringement as well as reimbursement of all costs and reasonable expenses. The Beijing Higher People’s Court has accepted the case, which was necessary in order for the case to proceed. On December 22, 2011 the Beijing Higher People’s Court transferred the case to the Beijing No. 1 Intermediate People’s Court under the caption (2011) Gao Min Chu Zi No. 4193. On June 7, 2012, we received an Acceptance Notice from the Beijing No.1 Intermediate People’s Court under the caption (2012) Yi Zhong Min Chu Zi No.6833. The Beijing No. 1 Intermediate Court held the first substantive hearing on May 11, 2015.  On June 15, 2015, we submitted a request for the withdrawal of our complaint to the Beijing No. 1 Intermediate Court.  On June 16, 2015, the Beijing No. 1 Intermediate Court granted our request.  We immediately filed a civil action application to the Beijing Intellectual Property Court against the same parties and seeking the same amount of monetary damages for trade secret infringement on June 16, 2015 under the caption (2015) Jin Zhi Min Chu Zi No. 1135.  On January 18, 2016, the Beijing Intellectual Property Court held its first substantive hearing on our trade secret infringement case.  At the hearing, the parties presented evidence, reviewed claims and answered questions from the court.  We are awaiting a decision from the Beijing Intellectual Property Court.
On September 16, 2011, we filed a civil copyright infringement complaint in the Hainan Province No. 1 Intermediate People’s Court against Dalian Guotong Electric Co. Ltd. (“Guotong”), a supplier of power converter products to Sinovel, and Huaneng Hainan Power, Inc. (“Huaneng”), a wind farm operator that has purchased Sinovel wind turbines containing Guotong power converter products. The case is captioned (2011) Hainan Yi Zhong Min Chu Zi No. 62. The application alleges that our PM1000 converters in certain Sinovel wind turbines have been replaced by converters produced by Guotong. Because the Guotong converters are being used in wind turbines containing our wind turbine control software, we believe that our copyrighted software is being infringed. We are seeking a cease and desist order with respect to the unauthorized use of our software, monetary damages of approximately RMB 1.2 million (approximately $0.2 million) for our economic losses (with respect to Guotong only) and reimbursement of all costs and reasonable expenses. The court has accepted the case, which was necessary in order for the case to proceed. In addition, upon the request of the defendant Huaneng, Sinovel has been added by the court to this case as a defendant and Huaneng has been released from this case. On November 18, 2014, the Hainan No. 1 Intermediate People’s Court held its first substantive hearing in the Hainan case.  At the hearing, the parties presented evidence, reviewed claims, and answered questions from the court.  On June 3, 2015, we received notification from the Hainan No. 1 Intermediate People’s Court that it dismissed the case for what it cited was a lack of evidence.  On June 18, 2015 we filed an appeal of the Hainan No. 1 Intermediate People’s Court decision to dismiss the case with the Hainan Higher People’s Court.  On August 20, 2015, the Hainan Higher People’s Court accepted the appeal under the caption (2015) QiongZhi MinZhongZi No.6.  On November 26, 2015, the Hainan Higher People’s Court held its first substantive hearing on our appeal of the Hainan No. 1 Intermediate People’s Court’s dismissal of the case.  On August 17, 2016, we received notification from the Hainan Higher People’s Court that it dismissed the case for what it cited was a lack of evidence. We intend to file an appeal of the Hainan Higher People’s Court’s decision with China’s Supreme People’s Court. China’s Supreme People’s Court has discretion to decide whether to hear the appeal.

None

ITEM 1A.

RISK FACTORS

There have been no material changes in the nine months ended December 31, 2017 to the risk factors described in Part I, Item IA1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017,2022, filed with the SEC on May 25, 2017.


June 1, 2022.

ITEM 2.

UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS


None

The Company’s stock repurchase activity during the three months ended September 30, 2022 was as follows:

Month

ITEM 3.DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
None
ITEM 4.MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES


Not Applicable
ITEM 5.OTHER INFORMATION
None
ITEM 6.EXHIBITS
See the Exhibit Index on the page immediately preceding the exhibits for a list of exhibits filed as part of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, which Exhibit Index is incorporated herein by this reference.


EXHIBIT INDEX

Total Number
of Shares
Purchased
(a)

  Incorporated by Reference
Exhibit
Number

Average
Price Paid
per Share

 Exhibit Description

Total Number of
Shares Purchased
as Part of Publicly
Announced
Plans or
Programs

 FormApproximate
Dollar Value of Shares
that May Yet Be
Purchased under the
Plans or Programs
(in millions)
July 1, 2022 - July 31, 2022 File No.Exhibit
Filing
Date
Filed/Furnished
Herewith
31.1      *
     
31.2August 31, 2022 - August 31, 2022       *
     
32.1September 30, 2022 - September 30, 2022       **
     
32.2

Total

       **
     

(a) During the three months ended September 30, 2022, we did not repurchase shares in connection with our stock-based compensation plans.

101.INS

ITEM 3.

DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

None

ITEM 4.

XBRL Instance Document.***

MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not Applicable

ITEM 5.

OTHER INFORMATION

None


ITEM 6.

EXHIBITS

EXHIBIT INDEX

    Incorporated by Reference

Exhibit

Number

 

Exhibit Description

 

Form

 

File No.

 

Exhibit

 

Filing

Date

 

Filed/Furnished

Herewith

10.1 2022 Stock Incentive Plan. 8-K 000-19672 10.1 8/5/22  
             
10.2 Form of Time-Based Restricted Stock Agreement Under 2022 Stock Incentive Plan. 8-K 000-19672 10.2 8/5/22  
             
10.3 Form of Performance-Based Restricted Stock Agreement Under 2022 Stock Incentive Plan. 8-K 000-19672 10.3 8/5/22  
             
10.4 Form of Option Agreement Under 2022 Stock Incentive Plan. 8-K 000-19672 10.4 8/5/22  
             
10.5 Amended and Restated 2007 Director Stock Plan. 8-K 000-19672 10.5 8/5/22  
             

31.1

 

Chief Executive Officer—Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

*

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

31.2

 

Chief Financial Officer—Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

*

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

32.1

 

Chief Executive Officer—Certification pursuant to Rule13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

**

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

32.2

 

Chief Financial Officer—Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

**

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

101.INS

 

Inline XBRL Instance Document - the instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

*

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

101.SCH

 

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

*

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

101.CAL

 

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Calculation Linkbase Document. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

*

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

101.DEF

 

Inline XBRL Definition Linkbase Document. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

*

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

101.LAB

 

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Label Linkbase Document. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

*

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

101.PRE

 

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Presentation Linkbase Document. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

*

             
104  Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101)          

_________________________

*

101.SCHXBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document. ***
101.CALXBRL Taxonomy Calculation Linkbase Document. ***
101.DEFXBRL Definition Linkbase Document. ***
101.LABXBRL Taxonomy Label Linkbase Document. ***
101.PREXBRL Taxonomy Presentation Linkbase Document. ***
_________________________
*

Filed herewith

**

**

Furnished herewith

***Submitted electronically herewith

Attached as Exhibits 101 to this report are the following formatted in inline XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2017September 30, 2022 and March 31, 20172022 (ii) Condensed Statements of Operations and Income for the three and ninesix months ended December 31, 2017September 30, 2022 and 2016,2021, (iii) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive (Loss) Income for the three and ninesix months ended December 31, 2017September 30, 2022 and 2016,2021, (iv) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the ninesix months ended December 31, 2017September 30, 2022 and 2016,2021, and (v) Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.




SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORPORATION

Date:

February 5, 2018

By:

/s/ John W. Kosiba, Jr.

Date:

November 1, 2022

John W. Kosiba, Jr.

Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)



41
33