UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549
 

FORM 10-Q
 

(Mark One)
ýQUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
For the quarterly period ended JuneSeptember 30, 2018
OR
oTRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from _______ to ______
 
Commission File Number: 001-31989
 
 
INTERNAP CORPORATION
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
Delaware91-2145721
(State or Other Jurisdiction of(I.R.S. Employer
Incorporation or Organization)Identification No.)
 12120 Sunset Hills Road, Suite 330
Reston, VA 20190
(Address of Principal Executive Offices, Including Zip Code)
 
(404) 302-9700
(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No ¨
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ý No ¨
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one): 
Large accelerated filer¨Accelerated filerý
Non-accelerated filer¨Smaller reporting company¨
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) Emerging growth company¨
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No ý

As of August 2,November 1, 2018, 21,218,43425,512,514 shares of the registrant’s outstanding common stock, $0.001 par value per share, were outstanding.


 


INTERNAP CORPORATION
FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNESEPTEMBER 30, 2018
TABLE OF CONTENTS
 
   
 
   
 
   
 2
   
 3
   
 
   

   
29
   
30
   
   
31
   

   

33
   
36
   
 


i





ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

INTERNAP CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)

 Three Months Ended
June 30,
 Six Months Ended
June 30,
 Three Months Ended
September 30,
 Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 2018 2017 2018 2017 2018 2017 2018 2017
Net revenues $81,962
 $69,642
 $156,163
 $141,775
 $82,972
 $68,907
 $239,135
 $210,682
                
Operating costs and expenses:  
  
      
  
    
Costs of sales and services, exclusive of depreciation and amortization 27,976
 26,429
 53,013
 55,474
 28,866
 24,945
 81,880
 80,419
Costs of customer support 8,841
 6,133
 16,228
 13,397
 7,984
 6,237
 24,212
 19,634
Sales, general and administrative 19,602
 15,571
 39,456
 32,135
 18,170
 15,331
 57,625
 47,466
Depreciation and amortization 22,590
 18,934
 43,667
 36,679
 23,431
 20,917
 67,097
 57,596
Exit activities, restructuring and impairments 826
 4,628
 793
 5,651
 2,347
 745
 3,140
 6,396
Total operating costs and expenses 79,835
 71,695
 153,157
 143,336
 80,798
 68,175
 233,954
 211,511
Income (loss) from operations 2,127
 (2,053) 3,006
 (1,561) 2,174
 732
 5,181
 (829)
                
Interest expense 15,860
 17,145
 30,887
 25,282
 16,898
 12,299
 47,786
 37,581
Loss (gain) on foreign currency, net 26
 191
 (189) 288
Loss on foreign currency, net 195
 197
 5
 485
Total non-operating expenses 15,886
 17,336
 30,698
 25,570
 17,093
 12,496
 47,791
 38,066
                
Loss before income taxes and equity in earnings of equity-method investment (13,759) (19,389) (27,692) (27,131) (14,919) (11,764) (42,610) (38,895)
Provision (benefit) for income taxes 141
 (50) 241
 468
Provision for income taxes 162
 221
 404
 689
Equity in earnings of equity-method investment, net of taxes 
 (56) 
 (86) 
 (1,122) 
 (1,207)
                
Net loss (13,900) (19,283) (27,933) (27,513) (15,081) (10,863) (43,014) (38,377)
Less net income attributable to non-controlling interests 23
 
 50
 
 25
 32
 75
 32
Net loss attributable to INAP stockholders (13,923) (19,283) (27,983) (27,513) (15,106) (10,895) (43,089) (38,409)
Other comprehensive income:  
  
    
Other comprehensive (loss) income:  
  
    
Foreign currency translation adjustment 61
 32
 122
 105
 (98) (91) 24
 14
Unrealized gain on foreign currency contracts 
 60
 
 145
 
 
 
 145
Total other comprehensive income 61
 92
 122
 250
Total other comprehensive (loss) income (98) (91) 24
 159
                
Comprehensive loss $(13,862) $(19,191) $(27,861) $(27,263) $(15,204) $(10,986) $(43,065) $(38,250)
                
Basic and diluted net loss per share $(0.69) $(0.96) $(1.40) $(1.52) $(0.75) $(0.56) $(2.16) $(2.04)
                
Weighted average shares outstanding used in computing basic and diluted net loss per share 20,053
 19,876
 19,985
 17,992
 20,206
 19,929
 19,968
 18,645
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.




INTERNAP CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except par value amounts)
(Unaudited)
 June 30,
2018
 December 31, 2017 September 30,
2018
 December 31, 2017
ASSETS  
  
  
  
Current assets:  
  
  
  
Cash and cash equivalents $14,739
 $14,603
 $11,844
 $14,603
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $1,689 and $1,487, respectively 20,251
 17,794
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $1,418 and $1,487, respectively 22,999
 17,794
Contract assets 8,474
 
 8,026
 
Prepaid expenses and other assets 9,689
 8,673
 9,497
 8,673
Total current assets 53,153
 41,070
 52,366
 41,070
        
Property and equipment, net 452,958
 458,565
 477,423
 458,565
Intangible assets, net 77,112
 25,666
 74,738
 25,666
Goodwill 116,705
 50,209
 116,705
 50,209
Non-current contract assets 12,760
 
 12,756
 
Deposits and other assets 12,019
 11,015
 12,050
 11,015
Total assets $724,707
 $586,525
 $746,038
 $586,525
        
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT  
  
  
  
Current liabilities:  
  
  
  
Accounts payable $29,806
 $20,388
 $32,243
 $20,388
Accrued liabilities 17,059
 15,908
 17,866
 15,908
Deferred revenues 5,837
 4,861
 4,696
 4,861
Capital lease obligations 10,246
 11,711
 9,399
 11,711
Revolving credit facility 16,000
 5,000
 18,500
 5,000
Term loan, less discount and prepaid costs of $3,995 and $2,133, respectively 362
 867
Term loan, less discount and prepaid costs of $3,912 and $2,133, respectively 444
 867
Exit activities and restructuring liability 2,968
 4,152
 3,255
 4,152
Other current liabilities 4,050
 1,707
 3,637
 1,707
Total current liabilities 86,328
 64,594
 90,040
 64,594
        
        
Capital lease obligations 220,721
 223,749
 252,599
 223,749
Term loan, less discount and prepaid costs of $11,546 and $7,655, respectively 415,418
 287,845
Term loan, less discount and prepaid costs of $10,625 and $7,655, respectively 415,251
 287,845
Exit activities and restructuring liability 284
 664
 162
 664
Deferred rent 907
 1,310
 940
 1,310
Deferred tax liability 1,928
 1,651
 1,952
 1,651
Other long-term liabilities 4,142
 7,744
 4,060
 7,744
Total liabilities 729,728
 587,557
 765,004
 587,557
Commitments and contingencies (Refer to Note 9) 

 

 

 

Stockholders’ deficit:  
  
  
  
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value; 5,000 shares authorized; no shares issued or outstanding 
 
 
 
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 30,000 shares authorized; 21,219 and 20,804 shares outstanding, respectively 21
 21
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 50,000 shares authorized; 21,302 and 20,804 shares issued and outstanding, respectively 21
 21
Additional paid-in capital 1,329,368
 1,327,084
 1,330,751
 1,327,084
Treasury stock, at cost, 328 and 293 shares, respectively (7,630) (7,159)
Treasury stock, at cost, 329 and 293, respectively (7,645) (7,159)
Accumulated deficit (1,328,502) (1,323,723) (1,343,609) (1,323,723)
Accumulated items of other comprehensive loss (1,202) (1,324) (1,300) (1,324)
Total INAP stockholders’ deficit (7,945) (5,101) (21,782) (5,101)
Non-controlling interests 2,924
 4,069
 2,816
 4,069
Total stockholders’ deficit (5,021) (1,032) (18,966) (1,032)
Total liabilities and stockholders’ deficit $724,707
 $586,525
 $746,038
 $586,525
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.



     
INTERNAP CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
 Six Months Ended June 30, Nine Months Ended September 30,
 2018 2017 2018 2017
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:  
  
  
  
Net loss $(27,933) $(27,513) $(43,014) $(38,377)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities:        
Depreciation and amortization 43,667
 36,679
 67,097
 57,596
Gain on disposal of fixed asset (29) 
(Gain) loss on disposal of fixed asset (98) 503
Amortization of debt discount and issuance costs 1,712
 1,292
 2,798
 1,890
Stock-based compensation expense, net of capitalized amount 2,232
 1,132
 3,573
 2,061
Equity in earnings of equity-method investment 
 (86) 
 (1,207)
Provision for doubtful accounts 604
 520
 706
 808
Non-cash change in capital lease obligations (371) 258
 (241) 564
Non-cash change in exit activities and restructuring liability 1,112
 5,391
 3,198
 5,824
Non-cash change in deferred rent (604) (1,199) (851) (3,335)
Deferred taxes 60
 150
 65
 209
Loss on extinguishment and modification of debt 
 6,785
 
 6,785
Other, net 3
 200
 (6) (49)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:        
Accounts receivable (2,165) 1,485
 (4,990) 243
Prepaid expenses, deposits and other assets (4,073) (1,039) (3,531) 1,979
Accounts payable 6,939
 477
 9,372
 (3,498)
Accrued and other liabilities (585) 3,150
 (601) 1,691
Deferred revenues 1,249
 (697) 617
 (1,233)
Exit activities and restructuring liability (2,676) (2,466) (4,597) (4,727)
Asset retirement obligation (188) 103
 (141) 191
Other liabilities (85) 12
 (199) 22
Net cash provided by operating activities 18,869
 24,634
 29,157
 27,940
        
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:        
Purchases of property and equipment (16,102) (12,293) (27,317) (23,198)
Proceeds from disposal of property and equipment 541
 
 570
 206
Business acquisition, net of cash acquired (131,748) 
 (131,748) 3,838
Acquisition of non-controlling interests (1,130) 
 (1,130) 
Additions to acquired and developed technology (1,340) (444) (2,128) (635)
Net cash used in investing activities (149,779) (12,737) (161,753) (19,789)
        
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:        
Proceeds from credit agreements 146,000
 295,500
 148,500
 295,500
Proceeds from stock issuance 
 40,162
 
 40,165
Principal payments on credit agreements (2,178) (326,500) (3,267) (327,250)
Debt issuance costs (7,696) (8,277) (7,696) (8,277)
Payments on capital lease obligations (4,760) (5,371) (7,202) (6,562)
Proceeds from exercise of stock options (108) 36
 (210) 159
Acquisition of common stock for income tax withholdings (471) (210) (487) (222)
Other, net 264
 (240) 175
 (302)
Net cash provided by (used in) in financing activities 131,051
 (4,900) 129,813
 (6,789)
Effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents (5) 70
 24
 217
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents 136
 7,067
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents (2,759) 1,579
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 14,603
 10,389
 14,603
 10,389
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $14,739
 $17,456
 $11,844
 $11,968
        
Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information:  
  
  
  
Cash paid for interest $28,509
 $14,899
 $44,324
 $25,898
Non-cash acquisition of property and equipment under capital leases 214
 147,788
 33,381
 169,679
Additions to property and equipment included in accounts payable 4,023
 1,269
 4,004
 701
 
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.


INTERNAP CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
 
1.NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION

Internap Corporation (“we,” “us,” “our,” “INAP,” or “the Company”) is a leadingglobal provider of high-performance data center services, including colocation, cloud and network. INAP partners with its customers, who range from the Fortune 500 to emerging start-ups, to create secure, scalable and reliable IT infrastructure solutions that meet the customer’s unique business requirements. INAP operates in 56,53, primarily Tier 3, data centers in 21 metropolitan markets and has 99102 points of presence ("POPs") around the world. INAP has over 1 million gross square feet in its portfolio, and nearlyapproximately 600,000 square feet of sellable data center space. 

We have prepared the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for interim financial information. These financial statements include all of our accounts and those of our wholly-owned subsidiaries. We have eliminated all intercompany transactions and balances in the accompanying financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the interim results have been reflected therein. All such adjustments were of a normal and recurring nature with the exception of those related to the adoption of new accounting standards as discussed in Note 2, "Recent Accounting Pronouncements.Pronouncements" and Note 3, "Revenues."
 
We have condensed or omitted certain information and note disclosures normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP. The accompanying financial statements reflect all adjustments, which consist of normal recurring adjustments unless otherwise disclosed, necessary for a fair statement of our financial position as of JuneSeptember 30, 2018 and our operating results and cash flows for the interim periods presented. The balance sheet at December 31, 2017 was derived from our audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by GAAP. You should read the accompanying financial statements and the related notes in conjunction with our financial statements and notes thereto contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).
 
The preparation of financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. Actual results may differ materially from these estimates. The results of operations for the three and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2018 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the 2018 fiscal year or any future periods. 

2.    RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
 
In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standard Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) ("ASC 606"). This standard update, along with related subsequently issued updates, clarifies the principles for recognizing revenue and develops a common revenue standard for GAAP. The standard update also amends current guidance for the recognition of costs to obtain and fulfill contracts with customers such that incremental costs of obtaining and direct costs of fulfilling contracts with customers will be deferred and amortized consistent with the transfer of the related good or service. ASC 606 intends to provide a more robust framework for addressing revenue issues; improve comparability of revenue recognition practices across entities, industries, jurisdictions, and capital markets; and provide more useful information to users of financial statements through improved disclosure requirements. The Company adopted this guidance on January 1, 2018 using the modified retrospective method. Following the adoption of this guidance, the revenue recognition for our sales arrangements remained materially consistent with our historical practice. For more information, see Note 3, "Revenues."
 
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases(Topic (Topic 842), which states that a lessee should recognize the assets and liabilities that arise from leases. The guidance is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2018. Earlier adoption is permitted. We expect to adopt the new standard on January 1, 2019. 

BasedThe Company’s adoption process of the new standard is ongoing, including evaluating and quantifying the impact on its consolidated financial statements, identifying the population of leases (and embedded leases), implementing a selected technology solution and collecting and validating lease data. Additionally, the Company is in the process of assessing any potential impacts on the resultsinternal controls and process related to both the implementation and ongoing compliance of our assessment to date, we anticipate this standard will have an impact, which could be significant, on our consolidated financial statements.the new guidance. While we arethe Company is continuing to assess all potential impacts of the standard, weit currently believebelieves the most significant impact relates to the recognition on the Company’s balance sheet of a right-of-use assetassets and lease liability. The lease liability will be initially measured at the present value of the lease payment; the asset will be based on the liability, subject to adjustment, such asliabilities for initial direct costs.all operating leases. Consistent with current guidance, the recognition, measurement, and presentation of expenses and cash flows arising from a lease by a lessee primarily will depend on its classification. For income statement purposes, operating leases will result in a straight-line expense while finance leases will result in a front-loaded expense pattern.



The new lease standard provides entities two options for applying the modified retrospective approach (1) retrospectively to each prior reporting period presented in the financial statements with the cumulative-effect adjustment recognized at the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented or (2) retrospectively at the beginning of the period of adoption (January 1, 2019) through a cumulative-effect adjustment recognized then. The Company currently plans to adopt thisthe standard usingby recognizing and measuring leases at the modified retrospective transition approachadoption date with optional practical expedients.a cumulative effect of initially applying the guidance recognized at the date of initial application. The Company is continuingcurrently planning on electing the package of practical expedients to assess all potential impacts ofnot reassess prior conclusions related to contracts containing leases, lease classification and initial direct costs and is evaluating the standard,other practical expedients available under the impact of the standard on current accounting policies, practices and system of internal controls, in order to identify material differences, if any, that would result from applying the new requirements.guidance.

On August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments, a consensus of the FASB’s Emerging Issues Task Force. The new guidance is intended to reduce diversity in practice in how certain transactions are classified in the statement of cash flows. We adopted this guidance in the first quarter of 2018 and it did not have a significant impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements.

On January 2017, the FASB issued final guidance that revises the definition of a business, ASU No. 2017-01: Clarifying the Definition of a Business (Topic 805). The definition of a business affects many areas of accounting (e.g., acquisitions, disposals, goodwill impairment, or consolidation). The guidance requires an entity to evaluate if substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or a group of similar identifiable assets; if so, the set of transferred assets and activities is not a business. The guidance also requires a business to include at least one substantive process and narrows the definition of outputs by more closely aligning it with how outputs are described in ASC 606. We adopted this guidance in the first quarter of 2018 and it did not impact our condensed consolidated financial statements. The guidance may have an impact on the Company as it pursues its strategy to develop its business.

On May 2017, the FASB issued guidance ASU No. 2017-09: Scope of Modification Accounting (Topic 718), to clarify when to account for a change to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award as a modification. Under the new guidance, modification accounting is required only if the fair value, the vesting conditions, or the classification of the award (as equity or liability) changes as a result of the change in terms or conditions. We adopted this guidance in the first quarter of 2018 and it did not impact our condensed consolidated financial statements.


3.    REVENUES

Upon adoption of ASC 606, the Company applied certain transition practical expedients available for modified retrospective adoption.

The Company adopted the practical expedient for the portfolio approach of contracts with similar characteristics in which the Company reasonably expects that the effects on the financial statements of applying this practical expedient to the portfolio would not differ materially from applying this guidance to the individual contracts (or performance obligations) within that portfolio.

The Company also adopted the practical expedient to not disclose the value of unsatisfied performance obligations for (i) contracts with an original expected length of one year or less, (ii) contracts for which INAP recognizes revenue at the amount to which the Company has the right to invoice for services performed, and (iii) the value for variable consideration that is applied to individual performance obligations in a series.

The Company elected to exclude from the measurement of the transaction price all taxes assessed by a governmental authority that are both imposed on and concurrent with a specific revenue-producing transaction and collected by the entity from a customer (e.g., sales, use, and value added taxes).

Changes in Accounting Policies

The most significant impact of the adoption of the new standard is the requirement for incremental costs to obtain a customer, such as commissions, which previously were expensed as incurred, to be deferred and amortized over the period of contract performance or a longer period if renewals are expected and the renewal commission is not commensurate with the initial commission.

In addition, installation revenues are recognized over the initial contract life rather than over the estimated customer life, as they are not significant to the total contract and therefore do not represent a material right.



Most performance obligations, with the exception of certain sales of equipment or hardware, are satisfied over time as the customer consumes the benefits as we perform. For equipment and hardware sales, the performance obligation is satisfied when control transfers to the customer.

In evaluating the treatment of certain contracts, the Company exercised heightened judgment in deferring installation revenue as well as expense fulfillment and commission costs over the appropriate life. With the exception of the revenues noted above, revenue


recognition remains materially consistent with historical practice. However, neither caused aour approach did not result in any material difference in thedifferences to our condensed consolidated financial statement.statements.

Adjustments to Reported Financial Statements from the Adoption

The following table presents the effect of the adoption of ASC 606 on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet as of January 1, 2018 (in thousands):
 December 31, 2017, as reported Adjustments January 1, 2018, as adjusted
ASSETS   
  
Prepaid expenses and other assets$8,673
 $6,814
 $15,487
Deposits and other assets11,015
 11,234
 22,249
 

 

 

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT   
  
Deferred revenues4,861
 (749) 4,112
Deferred tax liability1,651
 209
 1,860
Other long-term liabilities7,744
 (4,616) 3,128
Accumulated deficit(1,323,723) 23,204
 (1,300,519)

Current Impact from the Adoption

In accordance with the new revenue standard requirements, the disclosure of the current period impact of adoption on our
condensed consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive loss and balance sheet is as follows (in thousands, except for per share amounts):
For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2018For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2018
As Reported Balances without Adoption of ASC 606 Effect of Change Higher/ (Lower)As Reported Balances without Adoption of ASC 606 Effect of Change Higher/ (Lower)
Net revenues$81,962
 $81,757
 $205
$82,972
 $82,822
 $150
          
Sales, general and administrative19,602
 19,624
 (22)18,170
 18,100
 70
Total operating costs and expenses79,835
 79,857
 (22)80,798
 80,728
 70
Income from operations2,127
 1,900
 227
2,174
 2,094
 80
          
Loss before income taxes and equity in earnings of equity-method investment(13,759) (13,986) 227
(14,919) (14,999) 80
          
Net loss(13,900) (14,127) 227
(15,081) (15,161) 80
Less net income attributable to non-controlling interest23
 23
 
25
 25
 
Net loss attributable to INAP stockholders(13,923) (14,150) 227
(15,106) (15,186) 80
          
Comprehensive loss$(13,862) $(14,150) $227
$(15,204) $(15,186) $80




For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2018For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018
As Reported Balances without Adoption of ASC 606 Effect of Change Higher/ (Lower)As Reported Balances without Adoption of ASC 606 Effect of Change Higher/ (Lower)
Net revenues$156,163
 $155,717
 $446
$239,135
 $238,539
 $596
          
Sales, general and administrative39,456
 39,572
 (116)57,625
 57,671
 (46)
Total operating costs and expenses153,157
 153,273
 (116)233,954
 234,000
 (46)
Income from operations3,006
 2,444
 562
5,181
 4,539
 642
          
Loss before income taxes and equity in earnings of equity-method investment(27,692) (28,254) 562
(42,610) (43,252) 642
          
Net loss(27,933) (28,495) 562
(43,014) (43,656) 642
Less net income attributable to non-controlling interest50
 50
 
75
 75
 
Net loss attributable to INAP stockholders(27,983) (28,545) 562
(43,089) (43,731) 642
          
Comprehensive loss$(27,861) $(28,423) $562
$(43,065) $(43,707) $642



June 30, 2018September 30, 2018
As Reported Balances without Adoption of ASC 606 Effect of Change Higher/ (Lower)As Reported Balances without Adoption of ASC 606 Effect of Change Higher/ (Lower)
ASSETS   
  
   
  
Contract assets$8,474
 $7,490
 $984
$8,026
 $8,022
 $4
Non-current contract assets12,760
 12,153
 607
12,756
 12,756
 
          
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT   
  
   
  
Deferred revenues5,837
 5,271
 566
4,696
 4,771
 (75)
Other long-term liabilities4,142
 3,341
 801
4,060
 4,060
 
Accumulated deficit(1,328,502) (1,328,726) 224
(1,343,609) (1,343,534) (75)

Adoption of ASC 606 did not have a significant impact on the Company's condensed consolidated statement of cash flows.

The Company accounts for revenue in accordance with ASC 606. Revenue is recognized to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The Company enters into contracts that can include various combinations of products and services, which are generally capable of being distinct and accounted for as separate performance obligations.

The Company’s contracts with customers often include performance obligations to transfer multiple products and services to a customer. Common performance obligations of the Company include delivery of services, which are discussed in more detail below. Determining whether products and services are considered distinct performance obligations that should be accounted for separately versus together requires significant judgment by the Company.

A performance obligation is a promise in a contract to transfer a distinct good or service to the customer, and is the unit of account in ASC 606. A contracts transaction price is allocated to each distinct performance obligation and recognized as revenue when, or as, the performance obligation is satisfied. Total transaction price is estimated for impact of variable consideration, such as INAP’s service level arrangements, additional usage and late fees, discounts and promotions, and customer care credits. The majority of our contracts have multiple performance obligations, as the promise to transfer individual goods or services is separately identifiable


from other promises in the contracts and, therefore, is distinct. For contracts with multiple performance obligations, we allocate the contractscontract's transaction price to each performance obligation based on its relative standalonestand-alone selling price.

The stand-alone selling price (“SSP”) is determined based on observable price. In instances where the SSP is not directly observable, such as when the Company does not sell the product or service separately, INAP determines the SSP using information that may include market conditions and other observable inputs. The Company typically has more than one SSP for individual products and services due to the stratification of those products and services by customers and circumstances. In these instances, the Company may use information such as the size of the customer and geographic region in determining the SSP.

Revenue by source, with sales and usage-based taxes excluded, is as follows (in thousands):
 
Three Months Ended
June 30, 2018
 
Three Months Ended
June 30, 2017
 
Three Months Ended
September 30, 2018
 
Three Months Ended
September 30, 2017
 INAP US INAP INTL INAP US INAP INTL INAP US INAP INTL INAP US INAP INTL
Colocation $30,866
 $1,459
 $29,614
 $1,229
 $32,946
 $1,372
 $29,114
 $1,166
Network services 13,563
 2,792
 15,119
 1,530
 13,015
 2,719
 14,486
 2,281
Cloud 19,638
 13,644
 9,380
 12,770
 19,717
 13,203
 9,370
 12,490
 $64,067
 $17,895
 $54,113
 $15,529
 $65,678
 $17,294
 $52,970
 $15,937

 
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2018
 
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2017
 
Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2018
 
Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2017
 INAP US INAP INTL INAP US INAP INTL INAP US INAP INTL INAP US INAP INTL
Colocation $61,802
 $2,977
 $59,626
 $2,579
 $94,747
 $4,349
 $88,740
 $3,745
Network services 27,382
 5,763
 30,623
 3,047
 40,398
 8,482
 45,108
 5,329
Cloud 31,958
 26,281
 19,326
 26,574
 51,676
 39,483
 28,696
 39,064
 $121,142
 $35,021
 $109,575
 $32,200
 $186,821
 $52,314
 $162,544
 $48,138


Revenue by geography is as follows (in thousands):
 
Three Months Ended
June 30, 2018
 
Three Months Ended
June 30, 2017
 
Three Months Ended
September 30, 2018
 
Three Months Ended
September 30, 2017
 INAP US INAP INTL INAP US INAP INTL INAP US INAP INTL INAP US INAP INTL
United States $65,168
 $
 $55,206
 $
 $66,825
 $
 $54,006
 $
Canada 
 9,549
 
 9,531
 
 9,187
 
 9,421
Other countries 
 7,245
 
 4,905
 
 6,960
 
 5,480
 $65,168
 $16,794
 $55,206
 $14,436
 $66,825
 $16,147
 $54,006
 $14,901

 
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2018
 
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2017
 
Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2018
 
Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2017
 INAP US INAP INTL INAP US INAP INTL INAP US INAP INTL INAP US INAP INTL
United States $123,319
 $
 $111,751
 $
 $190,071
 $
 $165,757
 $
Canada 
 18,659
 
 19,899
 
 27,846
 
 29,320
Other countries 
 14,185
 
 10,125
 
 21,218
 
 15,605
 $123,319
 $32,844
 $111,751
 $30,024
 $190,071
 $49,064
 $165,757
 $44,925


For the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2018, revenue recognized that was included in the contract liability balance at the beginning of each year was $1.1$1.7 million.



Management expects that fulfillment costs and commission fees paid to sales representativerepresentatives as a result of obtaining service contracts and contract renewals are recoverable and therefore the Company capitalized them as contract costs in the amount of $27.6$28.6 million at JuneSeptember 30, 2018. Capitalized fulfillment and commission fees are amortized on a straight-line basis over the determined life, which vary based on the customer segment. For the three and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2018, amortization recognized was $2.9$3.1 million and $5.8$8.9 million, respectively. There was no impairment loss recorded on capitalized contract costs in the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2018.

Applying the practical expedient pertaining to contract costs, the Company recognizes the incremental costs of obtaining contracts as an expense when incurred if the amortization period of the assets that the Company otherwise would have recognized is one year or less. These costs are included in "Sales, general and administrative" expenses in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss.



4. ACQUISITION

On February 28, 2018, the Company acquired SingleHop LLC ("SingleHop"), a provider of high-performance data center services including colocation, managed hosting, cloud and network services for $132.0 million net of working capital adjustments, liabilities assumed, and net of cash acquired. The transaction was funded with an incremental term loan and cash from the balance sheet. As part of the financing, INAP obtained an amendment to its credit agreement to allow for the incremental term loan and to provide further operational flexibility under the credit agreement covenants. The amendments to the credit agreement are described in more detail in Note 7, "Debt."

The following table summarizes the preliminary fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date and reflects purchase accounting adjustments subsequent to the acquisition date (in thousands):
Preliminary Valuation as of March 31, 2018 Measurement Period Adjustments Preliminary Valuation as of June 30, 2018Preliminary Valuation as of March 31, 2018 Measurement Period Adjustments Preliminary Valuation as of September 30, 2018
Cash$2,857
 $(34) $2,823
$2,857
 $(34) $2,823
Prepaid expenses and other assets1,683
 544
 2,227
1,683
 544
 2,227
Property, plant and equipment14,885
 
 14,885
14,885
 
 14,885
Other long term assets39
 537
 576
39
 537
 576
Intangible assets:          
Noncompete agreements4,000
 
 4,000
4,000
 
 4,000
Trade names1,700
 
 1,700
1,700
 
 1,700
Technology15,100
 
 15,100
15,100
 
 15,100
Customer relationships34,100
 
 34,100
34,100
 
 34,100
Goodwill67,868
 (1,372) 66,496
67,868
 (1,372) 66,496
Total assets acquired142,232
 (325) 141.907
142,232
 (325) 141.907
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities5,098
 (224) 4,874
5,098
 (224) 4,874
Deferred revenue1,600
 (101) 1,499
1,600
 (101) 1,499
Long term liabilities534
 
 534
534
 
 534
Net assets acquired$135,000
 $
 $135,000
$135,000
 $
 $135,000

The above estimated fair values of consideration transferred, assets acquired and liabilities assumed are provisional and are based on the information that was available as of the acquisition date. Measurement period adjustments reflect new information obtained about facts and circumstances that existed as of the acquisition date. The measurement period adjustments primarily related to working capital and ASC 606. The Company believes that information provides a reasonable basis for estimating the fair values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed. Thus, the preliminary measurements of fair value set forth above aremaybe subject to change. The Company is in the process of finalizing the fair value adjustments. The Company expects to finalize the valuation as soon as practicable but no later than one year from the acquisition date.
The fair value assigned to identifiable intangible assets acquired was based on estimates and assumptions made by management. The intangible assets are being amortized over periods which reflect the pattern in which economic benefits of the assets are expected to be realized. The customer relationships are being amortized on an accelerated basis over an estimated useful life of ten years and the noncompete agreements, trade names, and technology are being amortized on a straight-line basis over four, eight, and seven years, respectively.
Goodwill represents the excess of the consideration transferred over the aggregate fair values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The goodwill recorded in connection with this acquisition was based on operating synergies and other benefits expected to result from the combined operations and the assembled workforce acquired. The goodwill acquired is deductible for tax purposes.
 
Acquisition-related costs recognized during the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2018 including transaction costs such as legal, accounting, valuation and other professional services, were $2.9 million and are included in "Sales, general and administrative" expenses on the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss.



Pro Forma Financial Information

The following unaudited pro forma financial information presents the combined results of operations of INAP and SingleHop as if the acquisition had occurred on January 1, 2017. The unaudited pro forma financial information is not intended to represent or be indicative of our consolidated results of operations that would have been reported had the INAP and SingleHop acquisition been completed as of January 1, 2017, and should not be taken as indicative of our future consolidated results of operations. The pro forma results are as follows (in thousands except for per share amounts):
 Three Months Ended
June 30,
 Six Months Ended
June 30,
 Three Months Ended
September 30,
 Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 2018 2017 2018 2017 2018 2017 2018 2017
Revenues $81,962
 $81,792
 $164,288
 $165,999
 $82,972
 $80,622
 $247,260
 $246,622
Net loss (13,900) (19,462) (29,134) (28,108) (15,081) (11,708) (44,216) (39,817)
Basic and diluted net loss per share (0.69) (0.98) (1.46) (1.56) (0.75) (0.59) (2.22) (2.14)
Weighted average shares outstanding used in computing basic and diluted net loss per share 20,053
 19,876
 19,985
 17,992
 20,206
 19,929
 19,968
 18,645


5.    FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
 
We account for certain assets and liabilities at fair value. The hierarchy below lists three levels of fair value based on the extent to which inputs used in measuring fair value are observable in the market. We categorize each of our fair value measurements in one of these three levels based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. These levels are:
 
Level 1: Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;
Level 2: Inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities; and
Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized as follows (in thousands):
 
 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
June 30, 2018  
  
  
  
September 30, 2018  
  
  
  
Asset retirement obligations(1)
 $
 $
 $1,771
 $1,771
 $
 $
 $1,813
 $1,813
                
December 31, 2017  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Asset retirement obligations(1)
 
 
 1,936
 1,936
 
 
 1,936
 1,936
                
(1) 
We calculatecalculated the fair value of asset retirement obligations by discounting the estimated amount using the current Treasury bill rate adjusted for our credit risk. At JuneSeptember 30, 2018, the balance is included in “Other long-term liabilities,” in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. At December 31, 2017, $0.2 million and $1.7 million were included in "Other current liabilities" and "Other long-term liabilities," respectively, in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.

The following table provides a summary of changes in our Level 3 asset retirement obligations for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2018 (in thousands): 
Balance, January 1, 2018$1,936
$1,936
Accretion85
127
Payments(250)(250)
Balance, June 30, 2018$1,771
Balance, September 30, 2018$1,813
 


The fair values of our other Level 32 debt liabilities, estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis based on incremental borrowing ratesupon quoted prices for similar types of borrowing arrangements,items in active markets, are as follows (in thousands):
 
 June 30, 2018 December 31, 2017 September 30, 2018 December 31, 2017
 
Carrying
Amount
 
Fair
Value
 
Carrying
Amount
 
Fair
Value
 
Carrying
Amount
 
Fair
Value
 
Carrying
Amount
 
Fair
Value
Term loan $431,321
 $435,096
 $298,500
 $301,485
 $430,232
 $433,998
 $298,500
 $301,485
Revolving credit facility 16,000
 16,140
 5,000
 5,050
 18,500
 18,662
 5,000
 5,050
 
6.    GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS

Goodwill

General
The Company tests goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives for impairment annually in the third quarter. Additionally, the Company may perform interim tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that could potentially reduce the fair value of a reporting unit or indefinite lived intangible asset below its carrying amount. The carrying value of each reporting unit is determined by assigning the assets and liabilities, including the existing goodwill and intangible assets, to those reporting units.
The Company tests goodwill for impairment by either performing a qualitative evaluation or a quantitative test. The qualitative evaluation is an assessment of factors, including reporting unit specific operating results as well as industry, market and general economic conditions, to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair values of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, including goodwill. The Company may elect to bypass this qualitative assessment for some or all of its reporting units and perform a quantitative test.
Goodwill is considered impaired if the carrying amount of the net assets exceeds the fair value of the reporting unit. Impairment, if any, would be recorded in operating income / (loss) and this could result in a material impact to net income / (loss) and income / (loss) per share.
In 2017, the Company adopted the new guidance under ASU No. 2017-04: Intangibles - Goodwill and Other: Simplifying the Accounting for Goodwill Impairment (Topic 350) which eliminated step 2 of the goodwill impairment test, which required a hypothetical purchase price allocation to measure goodwill impairment loss as of January 1, 2018.  A goodwill impairment loss under the new guidance is instead measured using a single step test based on the amount by which a reporting unit’s carrying amount exceeds its fair value, not to exceed the carrying amount of goodwill.  Based on the Company’s impairment test, no impairments were noted.

Annual Testing
2018
During the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2018, we changed our operating segments, as discussed in Note 10, “Operating Segments,” and, subsequently, our reporting units. We now have seven reporting units: US Colocation, US Cloud, US Network, INTL Colocation, INTL Cloud, INTL Network, and Ubersmith. We allocated goodwill to our new reporting units using a relative fair value approach. In addition, we completed an assessment of any potential goodwill impairment for all reporting units immediately prior to and after the reallocation and determined that no impairment existed.

We performed our annual impairment review as of August 1, 2018. To determine the estimated fair value of our reporting units, we utilized the discounted cash flow and market methods. We have consistently utilized both methods in our goodwill impairment assessments and weighted both as appropriate based on relevant factors for each reporting unit. The discounted cash flow method is specific to our anticipated future results of the reporting unit, while the market method is based on our market sector including our competitors.
We determined the assumptions supporting the discounted cash flow method, including the discount rate, using our estimates as of the date of the impairment review. To determine the reasonableness of these assumptions, we considered our past performance and empirical trending of results, looked to market and industry expectations used in the discounted cash flow method, such as forecasted revenues and discount rate. We used reasonable judgment in developing our estimates and assumptions. The market


method estimates fair value based on market multiples of revenue and earnings derived from comparable companies with similar operating and investment characteristics as the reporting unit.
The assumptions, inputs and judgments used in performing the valuation analysis are inherently subjective and reflect estimates based on known facts and circumstances at the time we perform the valuation. These estimates and assumptions primarily include, but are not limited to, discount rates; terminal growth rates; projected revenues and costs; earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization for expected cash flows; market comparables and capital expenditure forecasts. The use of different assumptions, inputs and judgments, or changes in circumstances, could materially affect the results of the valuation. Due to inherent uncertainty involved in making these estimates, actual results could differ from our estimates and could result in additional non-cash impairment charges in the future.

The Company determined, after performing the fair value analysis above, that all reporting units’ fair values were in excess of its carrying value. No impairment of goodwill has been identified for the nine months ended September 30, 2018.

During the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2018, our goodwill activity is as follows (in thousands):
 December 31, 2017 Re-allocations SingleHop Acquisition (Note 4) June 30, 2018 December 31, 2017 Re-allocations SingleHop Acquisition (Note 4) September 30, 2018
Operating segments:  
  
    
  
  
    
INAP COLO $6,003
 $(6,003) $
 $
 $6,003
 $(6,003) $
 $
INAP CLOUD 44,206
 (44,206) 
 
 44,206
 (44,206) 
 
INAP US 
 28,304
 66,496
 94,800
 
 28,304
 66,496
 94,800
INAP INTL 
 21,905
 
 21,905
 
 21,905
 
 21,905
Total $50,209
 $
 $66,496
 $116,705
 $50,209
 $
 $66,496
 $116,705
 
Other Intangible Assets

The components of our amortizing intangible assets, including capitalized software, are as follows (in thousands):

 June 30, 2018 December 31, 2017 September 30, 2018 December 31, 2017
 Gross Carrying Amount AccumulatedAmortization Gross Carrying Amount AccumulatedAmortization Gross Carrying Amount AccumulatedAmortization Gross Carrying Amount AccumulatedAmortization
Acquired and developed technology $69,419
 $(49,936) $52,825
 $(48,063) $70,201
 $(50,997) $52,825
 $(48,063)
Customer relationships, trade names and noncompete 110,766
 (53,137) 71,116
 (50,212) 110,774
 (55,240) 71,116
 (50,212)
 $180,185
 $(103,073) $123,941
 $(98,275) $180,975
 $(106,237) $123,941
 $(98,275)

During the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2018 and 2017, amortization expense for intangible assets was approximately $3.1$3.2 million and $1.1$1.8 million, respectively. Amortization expense for intangible assets was approximately $4.8$8.0 million and $2.2$4.0 million for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. As of JuneSeptember 30, 2018, remaining amortization expense is as follows (in thousands):
Three months remaining in 2018$3,598
201913,961
202013,394
202111,210
20228,251
20237,747
Thereafter16,577
Total$74,738



Six months remaining in 2018$6,291
201912,868
202011,989
202110,386
20228,406
Thereafter27,172
Total$77,112

7.    DEBT

Credit Agreement

On April 6, 2017, we entered into a new Credit Agreement (the “2017 Credit Agreement”), which provides for a $300$300.0 million term loan facility ("2017 term loan") and a $25$25.0 million revolving credit facility (the "2017 revolving credit facility"). The proceeds of the 2017 term loan were used to refinance the Company’s existing credit facility and to pay costs and expenses associated with the 2017 Credit Agreement.

Certain portions of refinancing transaction were considered an extinguishment of debt and certain portions were considered a modification. A total of $5.7 million was paid for debt issuance costs related to the 2017 Credit Agreement. Of the $5.7 million in costs paid, $1.9 million related to the exchange of debt and was expensed, $3.3 million related to term loan third party costs and will be amortized over the term of the loan and $0.4 million prepaid debt issuance costs related to the 2017 revolving credit facility and will be amortized over the term of the 2017 revolving credit facility. In addition, $4.8 million of debt discount and debt issuance costs related to the previous credit facility were expensed due to the extinguishment of that credit facility. The maturity date of the 2017 term loan is April 6, 2022 and the maturity date of the 2017 revolving credit facility is October 6, 2021. As of JuneSeptember 30, 2018, the balance of the 2017 term loan and the 2017 revolving credit facility was $431.3$430.2 million and $16.0$18.5 million, respectively. As of JuneSeptember 30, 2018, the interest rate on the 2017 term loan and the 2017 revolving credit facility was 7.80%7.90% and 8.99%9.25%, respectively.

Borrowings under the 2017 Credit Agreement bear interest at a rate per annum equal to an applicable margin plus, at our option, a base rate or an adjusted LIBOR rate. The applicable margin for loans under the 2017 revolving credit facility is 4.5%7.0% for loans bearing interest calculated using the base rate (“Base Rate Loans”) and 5.50%6.0% for loans bearing interest calculated using the adjusted LIBOR rate. The applicable margin for loans under the 2017 term loan is 5.00%5.75% for Base Rate Loans and 6.00%4.75% for adjusted LIBOR rate loans. The base rate is equal to the highest of (a) the adjusted U.S. Prime Lending Rate as published in the Wall Street Journal, (b) with respect to term loans issued on the closing date, 2.00%, (c) the federal funds effective rate from time to time, plus 0.50%, and (d) the adjusted LIBOR rate, as defined below, for a one-month interest period, plus 1.00%. The adjusted LIBOR rate is equal to the rate per annum (adjusted for statutory reserve requirements for Eurocurrency liabilities) at which Eurodollar deposits are offered in the interbank Eurodollar market for the applicable interest period (one, two, three or six months), as quoted on Reuters screen LIBOR (or any successor page or service). The financing commitments of the lenders extending the 2017 revolving credit facility are subject to various conditions, as set forth in the 2017 Credit Agreement. As of JuneSeptember 30, 2018, the Company has been in compliance with all covenants.  

First Amendment

On June 28, 2017, the Company entered into an amendment to the 2017 Credit Agreement (“First Amendment”), by and among the Company, each of the lenders party thereto, and Jefferies Finance LLC, as Administrative Agent. The First Amendment clarified that for all purposes the Company’s liabilities pursuant to any lease that was treated as rental and lease expense, and not as a capital lease obligation or indebtedness on the closing date of the 2017 Credit Agreement, would continue to be treated as a rental and lease expense, and not as a capital lease obligations or indebtedness, for all purposes of the 2017 Credit Agreement, notwithstanding any amendment of the lease that results in the treatment of such lease as a capital lease obligation or indebtedness for financial reporting purposes.

Second Amendment

On February 6, 2018, the Company, the Lenders party thereto and Jefferies Finance LLC, as Administrative Agent, entered into a Second Amendment to Credit Agreement (the “Second Amendment”) that amended the 2017 Credit Agreement.

The Second Amendment, among other things, amends the 2017 Credit Agreement to (i) permit the Company to incur incremental term loans under the 2017 Credit Agreement of up to $135$135.0 million to finance the Company’s acquisition of SingleHop and to pay


related fees, costs and expenses, and (ii) revise the maximum total net leverage ratio and minimum consolidated interest coverage ratio covenants.  The financial covenant amendments became effective upon the consummation of the SingleHop acquisition, while the other provisions of the Second Amendment became effective upon the execution and delivery of the Second Amendment.   This transaction was considered a modification.

A total of $1.0 million was paid for debt issuance costs related to the Second Amendment. Of the $1.0 million in costs paid, $0.2 million related to the payment of legal and professional fees which were expensed, $0.8 million related to term loan lender fees and will be amortized over the term of the 2017 Credit Agreement.



Third Amendment

On February 28, 2018, INAP entered into the Incremental and Third Amendment to the Credit Agreement among the Company, the Lenders party thereto and Jefferies Finance LLC, as Administrative Agent (the “Third Amendment”).�� The Third Amendment provides for a new incremental term loan facility under the 2017 Credit Agreement of $135$135.0 million (the “Incremental Term Loan”). The Incremental Term Loan has terms and conditions identical to the existing loans under the 2017 Credit Agreement, as amended.  Proceeds of the Incremental Term Loan were used to complete the acquisition of SingleHop and to pay fees, costs and expenses related to the acquisition, the Third Amendment and the Incremental Term Loan. This transaction was considered a modification. 

A total of $5.0 million was paid for debt issuance costs related to the Third Amendment. Of the $5.0 million in costs paid, $0.1 million related to the payment of legal and professional fees which were expensed, $4.9 million related to term loan lender fees and will be amortized over the term of the 2017 Credit Agreement.

Fourth Amendment

On April 9, 2018, the Company entered into the Fourth Amendment to 2017 Credit Agreement, among the Company, the Lenders party thereto and Jefferies Finance LLC, as Administrative Agent (the “Fourth Amendment”).  The Fourth Amendment amends the 2017 Credit Agreement to lower the interest rate margins applicable to the outstanding term loans under the 2017 Credit Agreement by 1.25%.

In addition, the Fourth Amendment amends the 2017 Credit Agreement such that if the Company incurs a “Repricing Event” (as defined in the 2017 Credit Agreement), before October 9, 2018, then the Company will incur a 1.00% prepayment premium on any term loans that are subject to such Repricing Event. This transaction was considered a modification.

A total of $1.7 million was paid for debt issuance costs related to the Fourth Amendment. Of the $1.7 million in costs paid, $0.1 million related to the payment of legal and professional fees which were expensed, $1.6 million related to term loan lender fees and will be amortized over the term of the 2017 Credit Agreement.

Fifth Amendment
On August 28, 2018, the Company entered into the Fifth Amendment to 2017 Credit Agreement, among the Company, the Lenders party thereto and Jefferies Finance LLC, as Administrative Agent (the “Fifth Amendment”).  The Fifth Amendment amended the 2017 Credit Agreement by increasing the aggregate revolving commitment capacity by $10.0 million to $35.0 million.
8.    EXIT ACTIVITIES AND RESTRUCTURING LIABILITIES
 
During 2017 and 2018, we recorded exit activity charges due to ceasing use of office space. We include initial charges and plan adjustments in “Exit activities, restructuring and impairments” in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss for the three and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2018 and 2017.

The following table displays the transactions and balances for exit activities and restructuring charges during the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2018 and 2017 (in thousands). Our real estate and severance obligations are substantially related to our INAP US segment.
 


 Balance       Balance Balance       Balance
 December 31, 2017 
Initial
Charges
 
Plan
Adjustments
 
Cash
Payments
 June 30,
2018
 December 31, 2017 
Initial
Charges
 
Plan
Adjustments
 
Cash
Payments
 September 30,
2018
Activity for 2018 restructuring charge:                    
Real estate obligations $
 $741
 $45
 $(163) $623
 $
 $1,821
 $902
 $(961) $1,762
Activity for 2017 restructuring charge:  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Real estate obligations 3,380
 
 143
 (1,896) 1,627
 3,380
 
 220
 (2,747) 853
Activity for 2016 restructuring charge: 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Severance 46
 
 34
 (34) 46
 46
 
 35
 (35) 46
Real estate obligations 247
 
 14
 (77) 184
 247
 
 29
 (122) 154
Activity for 2015 restructuring charge:  
 

 

 

  
  
 

 

 

  
Real estate obligation 64
 
 9
 (28) 45
 64
 
 8
 (36) 36
Service contracts 388
 
 14
 (99) 303
 388
 
 22
 (148) 262
Activity for 2014 restructuring charge:  
 

 

 

  
  
 

 

 

  
Real estate obligation 691
 
 112
 (379) 424
 691
 
 161
 (548) 304
 $4,816
 $741
 $371
 $(2,676) $3,252
 $4,816
 $1,821
 $1,377
 $(4,597) $3,417
 
 Balance       Balance Balance       Balance
 December 31, 2016 
Initial
Charges
 
Plan
Adjustments
 
Cash
Payments
 June 30,
2017
 December 31, 2016 
Initial
Charges
 
Plan
Adjustments
 
Cash
Payments
 September 30,
2017
Activity for 2017 restructuring charge:                    
Real estate obligations $
 $4,024
 $322
 $
 $4,346
 $
 $4,024
 $654
 $(881) $3,797
Activity for 2016 restructuring charge:  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Severance 1,911
 
 605
 (1,679) 837
 1,911
 
 958
 (2,467) 402
Real estate obligations 933
 
 379
 (370) 942
 933
 
 76
 (730) 279
Activity for 2015 restructuring charge:  
      
  
  
      
  
Real estate obligation 111
 
 (8) (14) 89
 111
 
 2
 (38) 75
Service contracts 565
 
 10
 (99) 476
 565
 
 15
 (148) 432
Activity for 2014 restructuring charge:  
    
  
  
  
    
  
  
Real estate obligation 1,183
 
 59
 (304) 938
 1,183
 
 95
 (463) 815
 $4,703
 $4,024
 $1,367
 $(2,466) $7,628
 $4,703
 $4,024
 $1,800
 $(4,727) $5,800
 


9.    COMMITMENTS, CONTINGENCIES AND LITIGATION

We are subject to legal proceedings, claims and litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. Although the outcome of these matters is currently not determinable, we do not expect that the ultimate costs to resolve these matters will have a material adverse impact on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
 
10.    OPERATING SEGMENTS

The Company has two reportable segments: INAP US and INAP INTL. These segments are comprised of strategic businesses that are defined by the location of the service offerings. Our INAP US segment consists of US Colocation, US Cloud, and US Network services based in the United States. Our INAP INTL segment consists of these same services based in countries other than the United States, and Ubersmith.

During the three months ended March 31, 2018, we changed our organizational structure in an effort to create more effective and efficient operations and to improve customer and product focus. In that regard, we revised the information that our chief executive officer, who is also our Chief Operating Decision Maker (“CODM”), regularly reviews for purposes of allocating resources and assessing performance. As a result, we report our financial performance based on our revised segment structure. We have reclassified prior period amounts to conform to the current presentation.



The prior year reclassifications, which did not affect total revenues, total costs of sales and services, operating loss or net loss, are summarized as follows (in thousands): 
 Three Months Ended June 30, 2017 Three Months Ended September 30, 2017
 
As Previously
Reported
 Reclassification As Reported 
As Previously
Reported
 Reclassification As Reported
Revenues:  
  
  
  
  
  
INAP COLO $52,044
 $(52,044) $
 $51,344
 $(51,344) $
INAP CLOUD 17,598
 (17,598) 
 17,563
 (17,563) 
INAP US 
 54,113
 54,113
 
 52,970
 52,970
INAP INTL 
 15,529
 15,529
 
 15,937
 15,937
Costs of sales and services, exclusive of depreciation and amortization:  
  
  
  
  
  
INAP COLO $22,070
 $(22,070) $
 $20,785
 $(20,785) $
INAP CLOUD 4,359
 (4,359) 
 4,160
 (4,160) 
INAP US 
 21,137
 21,137
 
 18,906
 18,906
INAP INTL 
 5,292
 5,292
 
 6,039
 6,039

 Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017
 
As Previously
Reported
 Reclassification As Reported 
As Previously
Reported
 Reclassification As Reported
Revenues:  
  
  
  
  
  
INAP COLO $105,383
 $(105,383) $
 $156,727
 $(156,727) $
INAP CLOUD 36,392
 (36,392) 
 53,955
 (53,955) 
INAP US 
 109,575
 109,575
 
 162,544
 162,544
INAP INTL 
 32,200
 32,200
 
 48,138
 48,138
Costs of sales and services, exclusive of depreciation and amortization:  
  
  
  
  
  
INAP COLO $46,876
 $(46,876) $
 $67,661
 $(67,661) $
INAP CLOUD 8,598
 (8,598) 
 12,758
 (12,758) 
INAP US 
 44,684
 44,684
 
 63,589
 63,589
INAP INTL 
 10,790
 10,790
 
 16,830
 16,830


Each segment is managed as an operation with well-established strategic directions and performance requirements. Each segment is led by a separate General Manager who reports directly to the Company’s CODM. The CODM evaluates segment performance using business unit contribution which is defined as business unit revenues less direct costs of sales and services, customer support, and sales and marketing, exclusive of depreciation and amortization.
  
Our services, which are included within both our reportable segments, are described as follows:

Colocation
 
Colocation involves providing conditioned power with back-up capacity and physical space within data centers along with associated services such as interconnection, remote hands, environmental controls, monitoring and security while allowing our customers to deploy and manage their servers, storage and other equipment in our secure data centers. We design the data center infrastructure, procure the capital equipment, deploy the infrastructure and are responsible for the operation and maintenance of the facility.

Cloud


 
Cloud services involve providing compute resources and storage services on demand via an integrated platform that includes our automated bare metal solutions. We offer our next generation cloud platforms in our high density colocation facilities and utilize the INAP performance IP for low latency connectivity. 

Network
 
Network services includes our patented Performance IP™ service, content delivery network services, IP routing hardware and software platform. By intelligently routing traffic with redundant, high-speed connections over multiple, major Internet backbones, our IP connectivity provides high-performance and highly-reliable delivery of content, applications and communications to end users globally. We deliver our IP connectivity through 99102 POPs around the world.







The following table provides segment results with prior period amounts reclassified to conform to the current presentation (in thousands):
 Three Months Ended June 30, Six Months Ended June 30, Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30,
 2018 2017 2018 2017 2018 2017 2018 2017
Revenues:  
  
      
  
    
INAP US $64,067
 $54,113
 $121,142
 $109,575
 $65,678
 $52,970
 $186,821
 $162,544
INAP INTL 17,895
 15,529
 35,021
 32,200
 17,294
 15,937
 52,314
 48,138
Net revenues 81,962
 69,642
 156,163
 141,775
 82,972
 68,907
 239,135
 210,682
                
Cost of sales and services, customer support and sales and marketing:  
  
      
  
    
INAP US 34,873
 32,776
 65,396
 68,232
 35,842
 29,600
 101,252
 97,832
INAP INTL 11,872
 8,463
 23,005
 17,465
 11,478
 9,874
 34,483
 27,339
Total costs of sales and services, customer support and sales and marketing 46,745
 41,239
 88,401
 85,697
 47,320
 39,474
 135,735
 125,171
                
Segment profit:  
  
      
  
    
INAP US 29,194
 21,337
 55,746
 41,343
 29,836
 23,370
 85,569
 64,712
INAP INTL 6,023
 7,066
 12,016
 14,735
 5,816
 6,063
 17,831
 20,799
Total segment profit 35,217
 28,403
 67,762
 56,078
 35,652
 29,433
 103,400
 85,511
                
Exit activities, restructuring and impairments 826
 4,628
 793
 5,651
 2,347
 745
 3,140
 6,396
Other operating expenses, including sales, general and administrative and depreciation and amortization expenses 32,264
 25,828
 63,963
 51,988
 31,131
 27,956
 95,079
 79,944
Income (loss) from operations 2,127
 (2,053) 3,006
 (1,561) 2,174
 732
 5,181
 (829)
Non-operating expenses 15,886
 17,336
 30,698
 25,570
 17,093
 12,496
 47,791
 38,066
Loss before income taxes and equity in earnings of equity-method investment $(13,759) $(19,389) $(27,692) $(27,131) $(14,919) $(11,764) $(42,610) $(38,895)

The CODM does not manage the operating segments based on asset allocations. Therefore, assets by operating segment have not been provided.

11. NET LOSS PER SHARE

We compute basic net loss per share by dividing net loss attributable to our common stockholders by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. We exclude all outstanding options and unvested restricted stock as such securities are anti-dilutive for all periods presented.



Basic and diluted net loss per share is calculated as follows (in thousands, except per share amounts): 
 Three Months Ended
June 30,
 
Six Months
Ended
June 30,
 Three Months Ended
September 30,
 
Nine Months
Ended
September 30,
 2018 2017 2018 2017 2018 2017 2018 2017
Net loss $(13,900) $(19,283) $(27,933) $(27,513) $(15,081) $(10,863) $(43,014) $(38,377)
Less net income attributable to non-controlling interests 23
 
 50
 
 25
 32
 75
 32
Net loss attributable to common stock $(13,923)
$(19,283) $(27,983) $(27,513) $(15,106)
$(10,895) $(43,089) $(38,409)
Weighted average shares outstanding, basic and diluted 20,053
 19,876
 19,985
 17,992
 20,206
 19,929
 19,968
 18,645
Net loss per share, basic and diluted $(0.69) $(0.96) $(1.40) $(1.52) $(0.75) $(0.56) $(2.16) $(2.04)
Anti-dilutive securities excluded from diluted net loss per share calculation for stock-based compensation plans 1,345
 1,563
 1,345
 1,563
 1,065
 1,460
 1,065
 1,460

12. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

On October 23, 2018, the Company closed a public offering of 4,210,527 shares of common stock at $9.50 per share to the public and received from the underwriter net proceeds of $36.6 million (net of underwriting discounts and commissions, and other offering expenses). We have granted the underwriters a 30-day option to purchase up to 631,579 additional shares of common stock on the same terms and conditions as the shares offered in the public offering.


ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULT OF OPERATIONS
 
As used herein, except as otherwise indicated by context, references to “we,” “us,” “our,” “INAP.” or “the Company” refers to Internap Corporation and our subsidiaries.

Forward-Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements. These forward-lookingForward-looking statements include statements relatedregarding industry trends, our future financial position and performance, business strategy, revenues and expenses in future periods, projected levels of growth and other matters that do not relate strictly to sales, profitability, margins, operations improvement, cost reductions, participation in strategic transactions,historical facts. These statements are often identified by words such as “may,” “will,” “seeks,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “expects,” “projects,” “forecasts,” “plans,” “intends,” “continue,” “could” or “should,” that an “opportunity” exists, that we are “positioned” for a particular result, statements regarding our expectations for 2018 revenue, Adjusted EBITDA, capital expenditures and Adjusted EBITDA less Capex. Our ability to achieve these forward-lookingvision or similar expressions or variations. These statements isare based on certain assumptions, includingthe beliefs and expectations of our ability to executemanagement team based on our business strategy, leveraging of multiple routes to market, expanded brand awareness for high-performance Internet infrastructure services and customer levels. These assumptions may prove inaccurate ininformation available at the future. Becausetime such statements are made. Such forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance or results and involveare subject to risks and uncertainties there are important factors that could cause INAP’s actual results to differ materially from those expressed or impliedcontemplated by such forward-looking statements.
Therefore, actual future results and trends may differ materially from what is forecast in thesuch forward-looking statements due to a variety of important factors.

Such important factors, include,including, without limitation: our ability to execute on our business strategy to drive growth while reducing costs; our ability to maintain current customers and obtain new ones, whether in a cost-effective manner or at all; the robustness of the IT infrastructure services market; our ability to achieve or sustain profitability; our ability to expand margins and drive higher returns on investment; our ability to sell into new and existing data center space; the actual performance of our IT infrastructure services and improving operations; our ability to correctly forecast capital needs, demand planning and space utilization; our ability to respond successfully to technological change and the resulting competition; the geographic concentration of the Company’scompany’s data centers in certain markets and any adverse developments in local economic conditions or the demand for data center space in these markets; ability to identify any suitable strategic transactions; INAP's ability to realize anticipated revenue, growth, synergies and cost savings from the acquisition of SingleHop; INAP's ability to successfully integrate SingleHop’s sales, operations, technology, and products generally; the availability of services from Internet network service providers or network service providers providing network access loops and local loops on favorable terms, or at all; failure of third party suppliers to deliver their products and services on favorable terms, or at all; failures in our network operations centers, data centers, network access points or computer systems; our ability to provide or improve Internet infrastructure services to our customers; our ability to protect our intellectual property; our substantial amount of indebtedness, our possibility to raise additional capital when needed, on attractive terms, or at all, our ability to service existing


debt or maintain compliance with financial and other covenants contained in our credit agreement; our compliance with and changes in complex laws and regulations in the U.S. and internationally; our ability to attract and retain qualified management and other personnel; and volatility in the trading price of INAP common stock.

These risks and other important factors discussed under the caption “Risk Factors” in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”),SEC, and our other reports filed with the SEC could cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated by the forward-looking statements made in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.



Given these risks and uncertainties, investors should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements as a prediction of actual results. All forward-looking statements attributable to INAP or persons acting on its behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the foregoing forward-looking statements. All such statements speak only as of the date made, and INAP undertakes no obligation to update or revise publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
Overview
 
INAP is a leadingglobal provider of high-performance data center services, including colocation, cloud and network. INAP partners with its customers, who range from the Fortune 500 to emerging start-ups, to create secure, scalable and reliable IT infrastructure solutions that meet the customer’s unique business requirements. INAP operates in 56,53, primarily Tier 3, data centers in 21 metropolitan markets and has 99102 POPs around the world. INAP has over 1 million gross square feet in its portfolio, and nearlyapproximately 600,000 square feet of sellable data center space.  

Change in Organizational Structure
 
During the three months ended March 31, 2018, we changed our organizational structure in an effort to create more effective and efficient business operations and to improve customer and product focus. In that regard, we revised the information that our chief executive officer, who is also our chief operating decision maker, regularly reviews for purposes of allocating resources and assessing performance. As a result, we report our financial performance based on our two revised segments, INAP US and INAP INTL. The new operating segments are described in Note 10, “Operating Segments” in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements. We have reclassified prior period amounts to conform to the current presentation.
 
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
 
Recent accounting pronouncements are summarized in Note 2, "Recent Accounting Pronouncements," in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements.
 


Results of Operations
 
Three Months Ended JuneSeptember 30, 2018 and 2017
 
The following table sets forth selected consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss data during the periods presented, including comparative information between the periods (dollars in thousands):
 
 
Three Months Ended
June 30,
 
Increase (Decrease) from
2017 to 2018
 
Three Months Ended
September 30,
 
Increase (Decrease) from
2017 to 2018
 2018 2017 Amount Percent 2018 2017 Amount Percent
Net revenues $81,962
 $69,642
 $12,320
 18 % $82,972
 $68,907
 $14,065
 20 %
                
Operating costs and expenses:  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Costs of sales and services, exclusive of depreciation and amortization 27,976
 26,429
 1,547
 6 % 28,866
 24,945
 3,921
 16 %
Costs of customer support 8,841
 6,133
 2,708
 44 % 7,984
 6,237
 1,747
 28 %
Sales, general and administrative 19,602
 15,571
 4,031
 26 % 18,170
 15,331
 2,839
 19 %
Depreciation and amortization 22,590
 18,934
 3,656
 19 % 23,431
 20,917
 2,514
 12 %
Exit activities, restructuring and impairments 826
 4,628
 (3,802) (82)% 2,347
 745
 1,602
 215 %
Total operating costs and expenses 79,835
 71,695
 8,140
 11 % 80,798
 68,175
 12,623
 19 %
Income (loss) from operations $2,127
 $(2,053) $4,180
 204 % $2,174
 $732
 $1,442
 (197)%
                
Interest expense $15,860
 $17,145
 $(1,285) (7)% $16,898
 $12,299
 $4,599
 37 %


Supplemental Schedule

 
Three Months Ended
June 30,
 
Increase (Decrease) from
2017 to 2018
 
Three Months Ended
September 30,
 
Increase (Decrease) from
2017 to 2018
 2018 2017 Amount Percent 2018 2017 Amount Percent
Revenues:     

 

     

 

INAP US $64,067
 $54,113
 $9,954
 18 % $65,678
 $52,970
 $12,708
 24%
INAP INTL 17,895
 15,529
 2,366
 15 % 17,294
 15,937
 1,357
 9%
Net revenues 81,962
 69,642
 12,320
 18 % 82,972
 68,907
 14,065
 20%
     

 

     

 

Cost of sales and services:     

 

     

 

INAP US 20,836
 21,137
 (301) (1)% 21,853
 18,906
 2,947
 16%
INAP INTL 7,140
 5,292
 1,848
 35 % 7,013
 6,039
 974
 16%
Total costs of sales and services, exclusive of depreciation and amortization $27,976
 $26,429
 $1,547
 6 % $28,866
 $24,945
 $3,921
 16%

INAP US
 
Revenues for our INAP US segment increased 18%24% to $64.1$65.7 million for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2018, compared to $54.1$53.0 million for the same period in 2017. The increase was primarily due to revenue from organic growth, and the addition of SingleHop, acquired in February 2018, partially offset by typical customer churn.SingleHop.

Direct costs of our INAP US segment, exclusive of depreciation and amortization, decreased 1%increased 16%, to $20.8$21.9 million for the three
months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2018, compared to $21.1$18.9 million for the same period in 2017. The decreaseincrease was primarily due to $2.4
million ofSingleHop costs, related to conversion of operating leases to capital leases, $0.8 million from lower sales volume and $0.6 million of costs savings initiatives, partially offset by lower space and power costs from SingleHop.planned data center exits and network cost savings initiatives.
 

INAP INTL


 
Revenues for our INAP INTL segment increased 15%9% to $17.9$17.3 million for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2018, compared to $15.5$15.9 million for the same period in 2017. The increase was primarily due to revenue from the INAP Japan consolidation, and the addition of SingleHop.SingleHop and lower churn.

Direct costs of our INAP INTL segment, exclusive of depreciation and amortization, increased 35%16%, to $7.1$7.0 million for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2018, compared to $5.3$6.0 million for the same period in 2017. The increase was primarily due to $1.0$0.9 million ofin costs from the INAP Japan $0.7 million from higher space and power costs,consolidation and costs from SingleHop.

Other Operating Costs and Expenses
 
Compensation. Total compensation and benefits, including stock-based compensation, was $18.0$16.9 million for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2018, compared to $14.0$14.4 million for the same period in 2017. The changeincrease was primarily due to a $3.1$2.8 million increase in cash-based compensation and a $1.0$0.4 million increase in stock-based compensation, partially offset by a $0.3$0.6 million decrease in commissions and $0.1 million decrease in bonus accrual.
 
Stock-based compensation, net of amount capitalized, increased to $1.4$1.3 million during the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2018, from $0.5$0.9 million during the same period in 2017. The increase is due to additional employees receiving equity grants, and directors receiving their fees in shares of common stock in lieu of cash. The following table summarizes stock-based compensation included in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss (in thousands): 


 
Three Months Ended
June 30,
 
Three Months Ended
June 30,
 2018 2017 2018 2017
Costs of customer support $49
 $36
 $38
 $38
Sales, general and administrative 1,369
 498
 1,303
 891
 $1,418
 $534
 $1,341
 $929

Costs of Customer Support. Costs of customer support increased to $8.8$8.0 million during the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2018 compared to $6.1$6.2 million during the same period in 2017. The increase was primarily due to higher cash-based compensation due to increased headcount from SingleHop.the SingleHop acquisition.
 
Sales, General and Administrative. Sales, general and administrative costs increased to $19.6$18.2 million during the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2018 compared to $15.6$15.3 million during the same period in 2017. The increase was primarily due to a $0.9$1.1 million increase in cash-based compensation, a $0.9$0.8 million increase in commissions, $0.4 million increase in facility costs, $0.4 million increase in stock-based compensation a $0.8due to additional employees receiving equity grants and $0.1 million increase in non-income tax contingency, and a $0.5 million increase in commissions.other benefits.
 
Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization increased to $22.6$23.4 million during the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2018, compared to $18.9$20.9 million during the same period in 2017. The increase is primarily due to the depreciation on the capital leased assets obtained during the last halfthird quarter of 2017.2018.
 
Exit activities, Restructuring and Impairments. Exit activities, restructuring and impairments decreasedincreased to $0.8$2.3 million during the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2018 compared to $4.6$0.7 million during the same period in 2017. The decreaseincrease is primarily due to ceasing use ofplanned data center space in the prior year period which resulted in the higher restructuring expenses. There were no significant additions to the restructuring reserve in the current period.exits.

Interest Expense. Interest expense decreasedincreased to $15.9$16.9 million during the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2018 from $17.1$12.3 million during the same period in 2017. The decreaseincrease is primarily due to $4.8 million of extinguishment costincreased borrowings and $2.3 million of new debt issuance cost that was expensed in the prior year period.additional interest expense related to capital leases.
 
SixNine Months Ended JuneSeptember 30, 2018 and 2017
 
The following table sets forth selected consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss data during the periods presented, including comparative information between the periods (dollars in thousands):

  
Six Months Ended
June 30,
 
Increase (Decrease) from
2017 to 2018
  2018 2017 Amount Percent
Net revenues $156,163
 $141,775
 $14,388
 10 %
         
Operating costs and expenses:  
  
  
  
Costs of sales and services, exclusive of depreciation and amortization 53,013
 55,474
 (2,461) (4)%
Costs of customer support 16,228
 13,397
 2,831
 21 %
Sales, general and administrative 39,456
 32,135
 7,321
 23 %
Depreciation and amortization 43,667
 36,679
 6,988
 19 %
Exit activities, restructuring and impairments 793
 5,651
 (4,858) (86)%
Total operating costs and expenses 153,157
 143,336
 9,821
 7 %
Income (loss) from operations $3,006
 $(1,561) $4,567
 293 %
         
Interest expense $30,887
 $25,282
 $5,605
 22 %



  
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 
Increase (Decrease) from
2017 to 2018
  2018 2017 Amount Percent
Net revenues $239,135
 $210,682
 $28,453
 14 %
         
Operating costs and expenses:  
  
  
  
Costs of sales and services, exclusive of depreciation and amortization 81,880
 80,419
 1,461
 2 %
Costs of customer support 24,212
 19,634
 4,578
 23 %
Sales, general and administrative 57,625
 47,466
 10,159
 21 %
Depreciation and amortization 67,097
 57,596
 9,501
 16 %
Exit activities, restructuring and impairments 3,140
 6,396
 (3,256) (51)%
Total operating costs and expenses 233,954
 211,511
 22,443
 11 %
Income (loss) from operations $5,181
 $(829) $6,010
 725 %
         
Interest expense $47,786
 $37,581
 $10,205
 27 %


Supplemental Schedule

 
Six Months Ended
June 30,
 
Increase (Decrease) from
2017 to 2018
 
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 
Increase (Decrease) from
2017 to 2018
 2018 2017 Amount Percent 2018 2017 Amount Percent
Revenues:                
INAP US $121,142
 $109,575
 $11,567
 11 % $186,821
 $162,544
 $24,277
 15 %
INAP INTL 35,021
 32,200
 2,821
 9 % 52,314
 48,138
 4,176
 9 %
Net revenues 156,163
 141,775
 14,388
 10 % 239,135
 210,682
 28,453
 14 %
                
Cost of sales and services:                
INAP US 39,271
 44,684
 (5,413) (12)% 61,125
 63,589
 (2,464) (4)%
INAP INTL 13,742
 10,790
 2,952
 27 % 20,755
 16,830
 3,925
 23 %
Total costs of sales and services, exclusive of depreciation and amortization $53,013
 $55,474
 $(2,461) (4)% $81,880
 $80,419
 $1,461
 2 %

INAP US
 
Revenues for our INAP US segment increased 11%15% to $121.1$186.8 million for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2018, compared to $109.6$162.5 million for the same period in 2017. The increase in revenue is primarily from the SingleHop acquisition, partially offset by a decline in network revenues primarily due to customer churn, in addition to other typical customer churn.

Direct costs of our INAP US segment, exclusive of depreciation and amortization, decreased 12%4%, to $39.3$61.1 million for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2018, compared to $44.7$63.6 million for the same period in 2017. The decrease was primarily due to $6.4$5.0 million of costs related to conversion of operating leases to capital leases, $2.9$5.5 million from lower salespower and cost savings from planned data center exits, $4.0 million network savings from cost initiatives and lower volume, $2.4 million due to the closing of our 75 Broad facility, and $0.5 million of costs savings initiatives, partially offset by $2.1costs from SingleHop, and $3.9 million of costs from our Atlanta data center and costs from the addition of SingleHop.additions.
 
INAP INTL
 
Revenues for our INAP INTL segment increased 9% to $35.0$52.3 million for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2018, compared to $32.2$48.1 million for the same period in 2017. The increase was primarily due to revenuerevenues from the INAP Japan consolidation and the addition of SingleHop.



Direct costs of our INAP INTL segment, exclusive of depreciation and amortization, increased 27%23%, to $13.7$20.8 million for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2018, compared to $10.8$16.8 million for the same period in 2017. The increase was primarily due to $2.1$3.2 million of costs from the INAP Japan Consolidation, $0.6consolidation, costs from SingleHop, and $0.4 million from lower margin product mix and costs from SingleHop.mix.

Other Operating Costs and Expenses
 
Compensation. Total compensation and benefits, including stock-based compensation, was $34.6$51.5 million for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2018, compared to $28.8$43.2 million for the same period in 2017. The change was primarily due to a $3.9$6.9 million increase in cash-based compensation, a$1.5 million increase in stock-based compensation, $0.3 million increase in bonus accrual, and a $1.3offset by $0.4 million increasedecrease in stock-based compensation.commissions.
 
Stock-based compensation, net of amount capitalized, increased to $2.3$3.6 million during the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2018, from $1.1$2.1 million during the same period in 2017. The increase is due to additional employees receiving equity grants, and directors receiving their fees in shares of common stock in lieu of cash. The following table summarizes stock-based compensation included in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss (in thousands): 



 
Six Months Ended
June 30,
 
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 2018 2017 2018 2017
Costs of customer support $95
 $98
 $133
 $136
Sales, general and administrative 2,182
 1,034
 3,441
 1,925
 $2,277
 $1,132
 $3,574
 $2,061

Costs of Customer Support. Costs of customer support increased to $16.2$24.2 million during the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2018 compared to $13.4$19.6 million during the same period in 2017. The increase was primarily due to higher cash-based compensation due to increased headcount from SingleHop.
 
Sales, General and Administrative. Sales, general and administrative costs increased to $39.5$57.6 million during the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2018 compared to $32.1$47.5 million during the same period in 2017. The increase was primarily due to $2.8$2.7 million in acquisition costs, $2.2 million in increased facility costs, $1.4$2.6 million in higher cash-based compensation a $1.1due to increased headcount, $1.6 million increase in stock-based compensation a $0.6from more employees receiving stock compensation, $1.6 million increased in commissions, $0.9 million increase in facility costs and $0.7 million decrease in internal software costs that were capitalized (resulting in increased compensation costs in SG&A), offset by a $0.7 million decrease in tax"Sales, general and license fees.administrative" expenses).
 
Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization increased to $43.7$67.1 million during the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2018 compared to $36.7$57.6 million during the same period in 2017. The increase is primarily due to the depreciation on the capital leased assets obtained during the last halfthird quarter of 2017.2018.
 
Exit activities, Restructuring and Impairments. Exit activities, restructuring and impairments decreased to $0.8$3.1 million during the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2018 compared to $5.7$6.4 million of expense during the same period in 2017. The decrease is primarily due to ceasing useplanned closures of data center spacecenters in the prior year period, which resulted in the higher restructuring expenses. There were no significant additions to the restructuring reserve in the current period.
 
Interest Expense. Interest expense increased to $30.9$47.8 million during the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2018 from $25.3$37.6 million during the same period in 2017. The increase is primarily due to increased borrowings and additional interest expensesexpense related to capital leases.

Non-GAAP Financial Measure

We report our consolidated financial statements in accordance with GAAP. In addition, we present Adjusted EBITDA, an additional financial measure that is not prepared in accordance with GAAP (“non-GAAP”). A reconciliation of this non-GAAP financial measure to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure can be found below.

We define Adjusted EBITDA as GAAP net loss attributable to INAP shareholders plus depreciation and amortization, interest expense, provision (benefit) for income taxes, other expense (income), (gain) loss on disposal of property and equipment, exit activities, restructuring and impairments, stock-based compensation, non-income tax contingency, strategic alternatives and related costs, organizational realignment costs, pre-acquisitionacquisition costs and claim settlement.



Adjusted EBITDA is not a measure of financial performance calculated in accordance with GAAP, and should be viewed as a supplement to - not a substitute for - our results of operations presented on the basis of GAAP. Adjusted EBITDA does not purport to represent cash flow provided by operating activities as defined by GAAP. Our statements of cash flows present our cash flow activity in accordance with GAAP. Furthermore, Adjusted EBITDA is not necessarily comparable to similarly-titled measures reported by other companies.

We believe Adjusted EBITDA is used by and is useful to investors and other users of our financial statements in evaluating our operating performance because it provides them with an additional tool to compare business performance across companies and across periods. We believe that:

EBITDA is widely used by investors to measure a company’s operating performance without regard to items such as interest expense, income taxes, depreciation and amortization, which can vary substantially from company-to-company depending upon accounting methods and book value of assets, capital structure and the method by which assets were acquired; and



investors commonly adjust EBITDA information to eliminate the effect of disposals of property and equipment, impairments, restructuring and stock-based compensation which vary widely from company-to-company and impair comparability.

Our management uses Adjusted EBITDA:

as a measure of operating performance to assist in comparing performance from period-to-period on a consistent basis;

as a measure for planning and forecasting overall expectations and for evaluating actual results against such expectations; and

in communications with the board of directors, analysts and investors concerning our financial performance.

Adjusted EBITDA, as presented, may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies. Adjusted EBITDA is presented as we understand certain investors use it as one measure of our historical ability to service debt. Also Adjusted EBITDA is used in our debt covenants.

Although we believe, for the foregoing reasons, that our presentation of the non-GAAP financial measure provides useful supplemental information to investors regarding our results of operations, our non-GAAP financial measure should only be considered in addition to, and not as a substitute for, or superior to, any measure of financial performance prepared in accordance with GAAP.



The following table reconciles Adjusted EBITDA to net loss as presented in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss (in thousands): 
 
Three Months Ended
June 30,
 
Six Months Ended
June 30,
 
Three Months Ended
September 30,
 
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 2018 2017 2018 2017 2018 2017 2018 2017
Net revenues $81,962
 $69,642
 $156,163
 $141,775
 $82,972
 $68,907
 $239,135
 $210,682
                
Net loss attributable to INAP stockholders $(13,923) $(19,283) $(27,983) $(27,513) $(15,106) $(10,895) $(43,089) $(38,409)
Non-GAAP revenue 70
 
 110
 
Depreciation and amortization 22,590
 18,934
 43,667
 36,679
 23,431
 20,917
 67,097
 57,596
Interest expense 15,860
 17,145
 30,887
 25,282
 16,898
 12,299
 47,786
 37,581
Provision for income taxes 141
 (50) 241
 468
 162
 221
 404
 689
Other expense (income) 31
 135
 (184) 202
 195
 (925) 11
 (723)
Gain on disposal of property and equipment, net (75) (103) (29) (200) (66) (162) (96) (362)
Exit activities, restructuring and impairments 826
 4,628
 793
 5,651
 2,347
 745
 3,140
 6,396
Stock-based compensation 1,374
 534
 2,232
 1,132
 1,341
 929
 3,574
 2,061
Acquisition costs 306
 95
 2,864
 95
 5
 102
 2,869
 198
Strategic alternatives and related costs(1)
 23
 8
 50
 14
 25
 32
 75
 46
Organizational realignment costs(2)
 431
 295
 671
 582
 118
 14
 789
 596
Non-income tax contingency 800
 
 800
 1,500
 36
 
 836
 1,500
Claim settlement 
 713
   713
 
 
 
 713
Adjusted EBITDA $28,454
 $23,051
 $54,119
 $44,605
 $29,386
 $23,277
 $83,396
 $67,882

(1) 
Primarily legal and other professional fees incurred in connection with the evaluation by our board of directors of strategic alternatives and related shareholder communications. We include these costs in sales, general and administrative ("SG&A") in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss for the three and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2018 and 2017.
(2) 
Primarily professional fees, employee retention bonus and severance and executive search costs incurred related to our organization realignment. We include these costs in SG&A in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss for the three and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2018 and 2017.



Liquidity and Capital Resources
 
Liquidity
 
On an ongoing basis, we require capital to fund our current operations, expand our IT infrastructure services, upgrade existing facilities or establish new facilities, products, services or capabilities and to fund customer support initiatives, as well as various advertising and marketing programs to facilitate sales. As of JuneSeptember 30, 2018, we had $3.3$10.0 million of borrowing capacity under our 2017 revolving credit facility. Together with our cash and cash equivalents, the Company’s liquidity as of JuneSeptember 30, 2018 was $18.0$21.9 million.

As of JuneSeptember 30, 2018, we had a deficit of $33.2$37.7 million in working capital, which represented an excess of current liabilities over current assets. We believe that cash flows from operations, together with our cash and cash equivalents and borrowing capacity under our 2017 revolving credit facility, will be sufficient to meet our cash requirements for the next 12 months and for the foreseeable future. If our cash requirements vary materially from our expectations or if we fail to generate sufficient cash flows from our operations or if we fail to implement our cost reduction strategies, we may require additional financing sooner than anticipated. We can offer no assurance that we will be able to obtain additional financing on commercially favorable terms, or at all, and provisions in our 2017 Credit Agreement limit our ability to incur additional indebtedness. Our anticipated uses of cash include capital expenditures in the range of $40.0 to $45.0$43.0 million in 2018, working capital needs and required payments on our 2017 Credit Agreement and other commitments. We continue to optimize our cost structure through implementing cost reductions through such strategies as reorganizing our business units, right-sizing headcounts and streamlining other operational aspects of our business. However, there can be no guarantee that we will achieve any of our cost reduction goals. 

We have a history of quarterly and annual period net losses. During the three and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2018, we had a net loss attributable to INAP stockholders of $13.9$15.1 million and $28.0$43.1 million, respectively. As of JuneSeptember 30, 2018, our accumulated deficit was $1.3 billion. We may not be able to achieve profitability on a quarterly basis, and our failure to do so may adversely affect our business, including our ability to raise additional funds.

Our sources of capital include, but are not limited to, funds derived from selling our services and results of our operations, sales of assets, borrowings under our credit arrangement, the issuance of debt or equity securities or other possible recapitalization transactions. Our short term and long term liquidity depend primarily upon the funds derived from selling our services, working capital management (cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable and other liabilities), bank borrowings, reducing costs and bookings net of churn. In an effort to increase liquidity and generate cash, we may pursue sales of non-strategic assets, reduce our expenses, amend our credit facility, pursue sales of debt or equity securities or other recapitalization transactions, or seek other external sources of funds. 

Capital Resources
 
Common Stock Offering

On October 23, 2018, the Company closed a public offering of 4,210,527 shares of common stock at $9.50 per share to the public and received from the underwriter net proceeds of $36.6 million (net of underwriting discounts and commissions, and other offering expenses). We have granted the underwriters a 30-day option to purchase up to 631,579 additional shares of common stock on the same terms and conditions as the shares offered in the public offering.

Credit Agreement

On April 6, 2017, we entered into a new Credit Agreement (the "2017 Credit Agreement"), which provides for a $300$300.0 million term loan facility ("2017 term loan") and a $25$25.0 million revolving credit facility (the " 2017 revolving credit facility"). The proceeds of the 2017 term loan were used to refinance the Company’s existing credit facility and to pay costs and expenses associated with the 2017 Credit Agreement.

Certain portions of refinancing transaction were considered an extinguishment of debt and certain portions were considered a modification. A total of $5.7 million was paid for debt issuance costs related to the 2017 Credit Agreement. Of the $5.7 million in costs paid, $1.9 million related to the exchange of debt and was expensed, $3.3 million related to term loan third party costs and will be amortized over the term of the loan and $0.4 million are prepaid debt issuance costs related to the 2017 revolving credit facility and will be amortized over the term of the 2017 revolving credit facility. In addition, $4.8 million of debt discount and debt issuance costs related to the previous credit facility were expensed due to the extinguishment of that credit facility. The maturity date of the 2017 term loan is April 6, 2022 and the maturity date of the 2017 revolving credit facility is October 6, 2021.



As of JuneSeptember 30, 2018, the 2017 term loan had an outstanding principal balance of $431.3$430.2 million, which we repay in $1.1 million quarterly installments on the last business day of each fiscal quarter with the remaining unpaid balance due April 6, 2022. As of JuneSeptember 30, 2018, the 2017 revolving credit facility had an outstanding balance of $16.0$18.5 million. We have issued $5.7 million in letters of credit resulting in $3.3$4.3 million in borrowing capacity. As of JuneSeptember 30, 2018, the interest rate on the 2017 term loan and the 2017 revolving credit facility was 7.80%7.90% and 8.99%9.25%, respectively.



The 2017 Credit Agreement contains customary financial maintenance and operating covenants, including without limitation covenants restricting the incurrence or existence of debt or liens, the making of investments, the payment of dividends and affiliate transactions. As of JuneSeptember 30, 2018, we were in compliance with all covenants.

Second Amendment

On February 6, 2018, the Company, the Lenders party thereto and Jefferies Finance LLC, as Administrative Agent, entered into a Second Amendment to Credit Agreement (the "Second Amendment") that amended the 2017 Credit Agreement.

The Second Amendment, among other things, amends the 2017 Credit Agreement to (i) permit the Company to incur incremental term loans under the 2017 Credit Agreement of up to $135$135.0 million to finance the Company’s acquisition of SingleHop and to pay related fees, costs and expenses and (ii) revise the maximum total net leverage ratio and minimum consolidated interest coverage ratio covenants.  The financial covenant amendments became effective upon the consummation of the SingleHop acquisition, while the other provisions of the Second Amendment became effective upon the execution and delivery of the Second Amendment.  

A total of $1.0 million was paid for debt issuance costs related to the Second Amendment. Of the $1.0 million in costs paid, $0.2 million related to the payment of legal and professional fees which were expensed, $0.8 million related to term loan lender fees and will be amortized over the term of the 2017 Credit Agreement. This transaction was considered a modification.

Third Amendment

On February 28, 2018, INAP entered into the Incremental and Third Amendment to the Credit Agreement among the Company, the Lenders party thereto and Jefferies Finance LLC, as Administrative Agent (the "Third Amendment").  The Third Amendment provides for a new incremental term loan facility under the 2017 Credit Agreement of $135$135.0 million (the "Incremental Term Loan"). The Incremental Term Loan has terms and conditions identical to the existing loans under the 2017 Credit Agreement, as amended.  Proceeds of the Incremental Term Loan were used to complete the acquisition of SingleHop and to pay fees, costs and expenses related to the acquisition, the Third Amendment and the Incremental Term Loan. 

A total of $5.0 million was paid for debt issuance costs related to the Third Amendment. Of the $5.0 million in costs paid, $0.1 million related to the payment of legal and professional fees which were expensed, $4.9 million related to term loan lender fees and will be amortized over the term of the 2017 Credit Agreement.

Fourth Amendment

On April 9, 2018, the Company entered into the Fourth Amendment to 2017 Credit Agreement, among the Company, the Lenders party thereto and Jefferies Finance LLC, as Administrative Agent (the “Fourth Amendment”).  The Fourth Amendment amends the 2017 Credit Agreement to lower the interest rate margins applicable to the outstanding term loans under the 2017 Credit Agreement by 1.25%.

In addition, the Fourth Amendment amends the 2017 Credit Agreement such that if the Company incurs a “Repricing Event” (as defined in the 2017 Credit Agreement), before October 9, 2018, then the Company will incur a 1.00% prepayment premium on any term loans that are subject to such Repricing Event. 

A total of $1.7 million was paid for debt issuance costs related to the Fourth Amendment. Of the $1.7 million in costs paid, $0.1 million related to the payment of legal and professional fees which were expensed, $1.6 million related to term loan lender fees and will be amortized over the term of the 2017 Credit Agreement. This transaction was considered a modification.

Fifth Amendment
On August 28, 2018, the Company entered into the Fifth Amendment to 2017 Credit Agreement, among the Company, the Lenders party thereto and Jefferies Finance LLC, as Administrative Agent (the “Fifth Amendment”).  The Fifth Amendment


amended the 2017 Credit Agreement by increasing the aggregate revolving commitment capacity by $10.0 million to $35.0 million.

Cash Flows
 
Operating Activities
 
During the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2018, net cash flows fromprovided by operating activities declined $5.8increased $1.2 million versus the six months ended June 30, 2017. The decrease isto $29.2 million primarily due to a decreasethe increase in netchanges in operating assets and liabilities. Net income adjusted for non-cash items of $3.1 millionremained relatively flat ($20.533.2 million and $23.6$33.3 million infor the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively). We expect to use cash flows from operating activities to fund a portion of our capital expenditures and other requirements and to meet our other commitments and obligations, including outstanding debt.
Investing Activities
 


During the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2018, net cash used in investing activities was $149.8$161.8 million, primarily due to the SingleHop acquisition, capital expenditures related to the continued expansion and upgrade of our data centers and network infrastructure.

During the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2017, net cash used in investing activities was $12.7$19.8 million primarily due to capital expenditures related to the continued expansion and upgrade of our data centers and network infrastructure.

Financing Activities
 
During the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2018, net cash provided by financing activities was $131.1$129.8 million, primarily due to principal payments of $6.9$10.5 million on the credit facilities and capital lease obligations, partially offset by $146$148.5 million of proceeds from the 2017 Credit Agreement.

During the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2017, net cash used in financing activities was $4.9$6.8 million, primarily due to principal payments of $331.9$333.8 million on the credit facilities and capital lease obligations, partially offset by $295.5 million of proceeds from the 2017 Credit Agreement and $40.2 million of proceeds from the sale of common stock.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
 
Interest Rate Risk
 
Our objective in managing interest rate risk is to maintain favorable long-term fixed rate or a balance of fixed and variable rate debt within reasonable risk parameters. As of JuneSeptember 30, 2018, the balance of our long-term debt was $431.3$430.2 million on the 2017 term loan and $16.0$18.5 million on the 2017 revolving credit facility.

At JuneSeptember 30, 2018, the interest rate on the 2017 term loan and the revolver2017 revolving credit facility was 7.80%7.90% and 8.99%9.25%, respectively. We summarize the 2017 Credit Agreement in “Liquidity and Capital Resources—Capital Resources—Credit Agreement.” We are required to pay a commitment fee at a rate of 0.50% per annum on the average daily unused portion of the revolving credit facility, payable quarterly in arrears. In addition, we are required to pay certain participation fees and fronting fees in connection with standby letters of credit issued under the 2017 revolving credit facility. 

We estimate that a change in the interest rate of 100 basis points would change our interest expense and payments by $4.5 million per year, assuming we do not increase our amount outstanding.



Foreign Currency Risk

As of JuneSeptember 30, 2018, the majority of our revenue was in U.S. dollars. However, our results of operations and cash flows are subject to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. We also have exposure to foreign currency transaction gains and losses as the result of certain receivables due from our foreign subsidiaries. During the three and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2018, we realized a foreign currency loss (gain) of $0.2 million and less than $0.1 million and ($0.2) million, respectively, which we included in “Non-operating expenses,” and we recorded an unrealized foreign currency translation gainsloss of less than $0.1 million and less than $0.1 million, respectively, which we included in “Other comprehensive (loss) income,” both in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss. As we grow our international operations, our exposure to foreign currency risk will become more significant.



ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
 
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
 
Based on our management’s evaluation (with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer), as of the end of the period covered by this report, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer have concluded that, due to a material weakness in internal control over financial reporting described in Part II, Item 9A of our 2017 Form 10-K, our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) were not effective as of JuneSeptember 30, 2018.
 
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
 
Effective January 1, 2018, we adopted the new revenue guidance under ASC 606Revenue from Contracts with Customers, using the modified retrospective method of adoption. The adoption of this guidance required the implementation of new accounting


policies and processes which changed the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting for revenue and cost recognition, processes for calculating the cumulative effect adjustment as well as related disclosure requirements under the new guidance.

Remediation Plan
 
During 2017, management identified a material weakness in our internal controls over financial reporting related to the review of property and equipment, depreciation and amortization schedules. The Company has been actively engaged in remediation efforts and will continue initiatives to implement, document, and communicate appropriate policies, procedures, and internal controls regarding this material weakness. The Company’s remediation of the identified material weakness and strengthening of its internal control environment will require continued efforts in 2018.

As the Company continues to evaluate and work to improve internal control over financial reporting, the Company may determine to take additional measures to address the material weakness or determine to modify the remediation efforts described above. Until the remediation efforts discussed above, including any additional remediation efforts that the Company identifies as necessary, are implemented, tested and deemed to be operating effectively, the material weakness described above will continue to exist.

 


PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
 
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
 
We are subject to legal proceedings, claims and litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. Although the outcome of these matters is currently not determinable, we do not expect that the ultimate costs to resolve these matters will have a material adverse impact on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
 
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
 
We believe that there have been no material changes from the Risk Factors we previously disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 filed with the SEC on March 15, 2018.



ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
 
The following table sets forth information regarding our repurchases of securities for each calendar month in the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2018:
 
ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Period 
Total Number of Shares Purchased(1)
 Average Price Paid per Share Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares That May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
April 1 to 30, 2018 231
 $11.09
 
 
May 1 to 31, 2018 305
 11.26
 
 
June 1 to 30, 2018 14,790
 12.98
 
 
Total 15,326
 $12.92
 
 
         
Period 
Total Number of Shares Purchased(1)
 Average Price Paid per Share Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares That May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
July 1 to 31, 2018 759
 $11.46
 
 
August 1 to 31, 2018 206
 13.33
 
 
September 1 to 30, 2018 310
 12.63
 
 
Total 1,275
 $12.04
 
 
         
(1)These shares were surrendered to us to satisfy tax withholding obligations in connection with the vesting of shares of restricted stock and restricted stock units previously issued to employees and directors.employees.



ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

Disclosure Pursuant to Section 13(r) of the Exchange Act

Under the Iran Threat Reduction and Syria Human Rights Act of 2012, which added Section 13(r) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Company is required to disclose in its periodic reports if it or any of its affiliates knowingly engaged in certain activities, transactions or dealings relating to Iran or with entities or individuals designated pursuant to certain Executive Orders. Disclosure is required even where the activities are conducted outside the U.S. by non-U.S. affiliates in compliance with applicable law, and even if the activities are not covered or prohibited by U.S. law.

We determined that, between November 2012 and September 2018, our subsidiary iWeb provided information technology services to Pioneer Logistics Havacilik Turizm Yonetim Danismanlik Ithalat Ihracat San. Tic. Ltd. Sti, a Turkish company (“Pioneer Logistics”). On August 29, 2014, the Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry and Security (“BIS”) determined that Pioneer Logistics was part of a procurement ring which directly supported the operation of Mahan Airlines, an Iranian airline and entity on BIS’s denied persons list.

From August 2014 to September 2018, iWeb received approximately $8,855 in fees from Pioneer Logistics. We are unable to accurately calculate the net profit attributable to these transactions. We promptly terminated Pioneer Logistics as a customer upon learning of its designation and do not plan to provide services to Pioneer Logistics in the future.







































ITEM 6. EXHIBITS



The following exhibits are filed as part of this report:
Exhibit
Number
 Description 
    
10.1 
10.2# 

10.3#
10.4#
10.5#

\
10.6#
10.7#
.

31.1 
   
31.2 
   
32.1* 
   
32.2* 
   
101.INS XBRL Instance Document.
   
101.SCH XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.
   
101.CAL XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.
   
101.DEF XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.
   
101.LAB XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.
   
101.PRE XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.
     
     

#    Management contract and compensatory plan and arrangement.

*      This exhibit is furnished and will not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of


1934, as amended (15 U.S.C. 78r) ("Exchange Act"), or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such exhibit will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.


SIGNATURE
 
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
 
 INTERNAP CORPORATION
   
 By:/s/ James C. Keeley
  James C. Keeley
  (Chief Financial Officer)
   
  Date: August 2,November 1, 2018