Page

Commonly Used Defined Terms

extr

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

_______________________

FORM 10-Q

Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the Quarterly Period Ended March 31, ~~2019~~2020

Commission File Number 001-37469

Green Plains PARTNERS LP
‎

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Delaware	47-3822258
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

1811 Aksarben Drive, Omaha, NE 68106	(402) 884-8700
(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)	(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:


Title of each class	Trading Symbol(s)	Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Units, Representing Limited Partner Interests	GPP	The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

☒x Yes ☐¨ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).

☒x Yes ☐o No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.


Large ~~accelerated filer ☐~~Accelerated Filer o	Accelerated ~~filer ☒~~Filer x
~~Non‑accelerated filer ☐~~ Non-Accelerated Filer ¨
Smaller ~~reporting company ☐~~Reporting Company o	Emerging ~~growth company ☒~~Growth Company x

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☒x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

☐o Yes ☒x No

~~Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:~~


~~Title of each class~~	~~Trading Symbol(s)~~	~~Name of each exchange on which registered~~
~~Common Units, Representing Limited Partner Interests~~	~~GPP~~	~~The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC~~

The registrant had ~~23,137,695~~23,160,551 common units outstanding as of May ~~6, 2019.~~1, 2020.
‎

Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS



		Page
			~~Page~~
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Commonly Used Defined Terms		3

Item 1.	Financial Statements	34

~~Item 1.~~	~~Financial Statements~~Consolidated Balance Sheets	4

	~~Consolidated Balance Sheets~~	4

	Consolidated Statements of Operations	5

	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	6

	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	7

Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	2321

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	2930

Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	30

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	31

Item 1A.	Risk Factors	31

Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	3133

Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	3133

Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	3133

Item 5.	Other Information	3133

Item 6.	Exhibits	3234

Signatures.		3335

‎

Table of Contents

Commonly Used Defined Terms

The abbreviations, acronyms and industry terminology used in this quarterly report are defined as follows:

Green Plains Partners LP, Subsidiaries, and Partners:

z
Green Plains Operating Company	Green Plains Operating Company LLC
Green Plains Partners; the partnership	Green Plains Partners LP and its subsidiaries
NLR	NLR Energy Logistics LLC

Green Plains Inc. and Subsidiaries:


Green Plains; the parent or sponsor	Green Plains Inc. and its subsidiaries
Green Plains Holdings, the general partner	Green Plains Holdings LLC
Green Plains Trade	Green Plains Trade Group LLC

Other Defined Terms:

~~2018~~2019 annual report	The partnership’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2018,~~2019, filed February 20, ~~2019~~2020
ARO	Asset retirement obligation
ASC	Accounting Standards Codification
Bgy	Billion gallons per year
CAFE	Corporate Average Fuel Economy
CAMEX	Brazil Chamber of Foreign Trade
Conflicts committee	The partnership’s committee responsible for reviewing situations involving certain transactions with affiliates or other potential conflicts of interest
~~D.C.~~COVID-19	~~District of Columbia~~Coronavirus Disease 2019
~~E10~~D.C.	District of Columbia
E10	Gasoline blended with up to 10% ethanol by volume
E15	Gasoline blended with up to 15% ethanol by volume
E85	Gasoline blended with up to 85% ethanol by volume
EBITDA	Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization
EIA	U.S. Energy Information Administration
EPA	U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Exchange Act	Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
FASB	Financial Accounting Standards Board
GAAP	U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
~~IPO~~GATT	~~Initial public offering of Green Plains Partners LP~~General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade
LIBOR	London Interbank Offered Rate
LTIP	Green Plains Partners LP 2015 Long-Term Incentive Plan
Mmg	Million gallons
MTBE	Methyl tertiary-butyl ether
MVCs	Minimum volume commitments
Partnership agreement	First Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Green Plains Partners LP, dated as of July 1, 2015, between Green Plains Holdings LLC and Green Plains Inc.
PCAOB	Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
RFS II	Renewable Fuels Standard II
RIN	Renewable identification number
RVO	Renewable volume obligation
SEC	Securities and Exchange Commission
~~U.S.~~USDA	~~United States~~
~~USDA~~	U.S. Department of Agriculture
WTO	World Trade Organization

‎

Table of Contents

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements.

GREEN PLAINS PARTNERS LP

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands, except unit amounts)



		March 31,		December 31,
		2019		2018			March 31, 2020		December 31, 2019
		(unaudited)					(unaudited)
ASSETS	ASSETS					ASSETS
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents		$	304	$	569		$	264	$	261
Accounts receivable			2,277		1,460			652		985
Accounts receivable from affiliates			18,646		13,897			15,440		15,666
Prepaid expenses and other			667		690			473		517
Total current assets			21,894		16,616			16,829		17,429

Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization of $29,250 and $28,265, respectively			39,926		40,911
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization of $32,937 and $31,976, respectively								36,805		37,355
Operating lease right-of-use assets			35,950		-			37,385		35,456
Goodwill			10,598		10,598			10,598		10,598
Investment in equity method investee			3,863		3,648			4,487		4,329
Note receivable			8,100		8,100
Other assets			1,069		1,271			304		486
Total assets		$	121,400	$	81,144		$	106,408	$	105,653

LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' DEFICIT	LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' DEFICIT					LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' DEFICIT
Current liabilities
Accounts payable		$	4,697	$	2,501		$	6,846	$	5,050
Accounts payable to affiliates			517		676			460		543
Accrued and other liabilities			6,326		4,337			3,801		4,461
Asset retirement obligations			683		674			819		565
Operating lease current liabilities			12,621		-			12,899		13,093
Current maturities of long-term debt								130,200		132,100
Total current liabilities			24,844		8,188			155,025		155,812

Long-term debt			143,037		142,025
Deferred lease liability			-		843
Asset retirement obligations			2,592		2,542			2,654		2,500
Operating lease long-term liabilities			24,323		-			25,308		23,088
Total liabilities			194,796		153,598			182,987		181,400

Commitments and contingencies (Note 9)
Commitments and contingencies (Note 10)

Partners' deficit
Common unitholders - public (11,551,147 units issued and outstanding)			114,958		115,352
Common unitholders - public (11,574,003 units issued and outstanding)								113,665		114,006
Common unitholders - Green Plains (11,586,548 units issued and outstanding)			(187,110)		(186,635)			(188,724)		(188,304)
General partner interests			(1,244)		(1,171)			(1,520)		(1,449)
Total partners' deficit			(73,396)		(72,454)			(76,579)		(75,747)
Total liabilities and partners' deficit		$	121,400	$	81,144		$	106,408	$	105,653

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
‎

Table of Contents

GREEN PLAINS PARTNERS LP

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(unaudited and in thousands, except per unit amounts)



	Three Months Ended March 31,				Three Months Ended ‎March 31,
	2019		2018		2020		2019
Revenues
Affiliate	$	18,782	$	24,257	$	18,983	$	18,782
Non-affiliate		2,305		1,628		1,288		2,305
Total revenues		21,087		25,885		20,271		21,087
Operating expenses
Operations and maintenance (excluding depreciation and amortization reflected below)		6,865		8,410		6,160		6,865
General and administrative		1,117		1,401		1,044		1,117
Depreciation and amortization		985		1,181		961		985
Total operating expenses		8,967		10,992		8,165		8,967
Operating income		12,120		14,893		12,106		12,120
Other income (expense)
Interest income		20		20		-		20
Interest expense		(2,055)		(1,571)		(1,864)		(2,055)
Other		-		75
Total other expense		(2,035)		(1,476)		(1,864)		(2,035)
Income before income taxes and income (loss) from equity method investee		10,085		13,417
Income before income taxes and income from equity method investee						10,242		10,085
Income tax expense		(52)		(32)		(31)		(52)
Income (loss) from equity method investee		215		(13)
Income from equity method investee						158		215
Net income	$	10,248	$	13,372	$	10,369	$	10,248

Net income attributable to partners' ownership interests:
General partner	$	205	$	267	$	207	$	205
Limited partners - common unitholders		10,043		6,559		10,162		10,043
Limited partners - subordinated unitholders		-		6,546

Earnings per limited partner unit (basic and diluted):
Common units	$	0.43	$	0.41	$	0.44	$	0.43
Subordinated units	$	-	$	0.41

Weighted average limited partner units outstanding (basic and diluted):
Common units		23,119		15,922		23,138		23,119
Subordinated units		-		15,890

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

‎

Table of Contents

GREEN PLAINS PARTNERS LP

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(unaudited and in thousands)



	Three Months Ended March 31,				Three Months Ended ‎March 31,
	2019		2018		2020		2019
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	10,248	$	13,372	$	10,369	$	10,248
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash ‎provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		985		1,181		961		985
Accretion		59		63		62		59
Amortization of debt issuance costs		204		145		233		204
Unit-based compensation		79		60		79		79
(Income) loss from equity method investee		(215)		13
Income from equity method investee						(158)		(215)
Other		(22)		11		-		(22)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		(817)		1,829		333		(817)
Accounts receivable from affiliates		(4,749)		(5,380)		226		(4,749)
Prepaid expenses and other assets		23		189		44		23
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		4,238		2,583		1,093		4,238
Accounts payable to affiliates		(159)		611		(83)		(159)
Operating lease liabilities and right-of-use assets		119		-		97		119
Other		11		12		5		11
Net cash provided by operating activities		10,004		14,689		13,261		10,004

Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchases of property and equipment, net		-		(1,212)
Purchases of property and equipment						(22)		-
Net cash used in investing activities		-		(1,212)		(22)		-

Cash flows from financing activities:
Payments of distributions		(11,269)		(15,306)		(11,280)		(11,269)
Proceeds from revolving credit facility		30,600		24,400		22,200		30,600
Payments on revolving credit facility		(29,600)		(22,300)		(24,100)		(29,600)
Payments of loan fees		-		(185)		(56)		-
Net cash used in financing activities		(10,269)		(13,391)		(13,236)		(10,269)

Net change in cash and cash equivalents		(265)		86		3		(265)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		569		502		261		569
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	304	$	588	$	264	$	304


Supplemental disclosures of cash flow
Cash paid for income taxes	$	126	$	71	$	78	$	126
Cash paid for interest	$	1,780	$	1,327	$	1,537	$	1,780

Non-cash investing activities:
Contributions to equity method investee	$	-	$	1,172

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

GREEN PLAINS PARTNERS LP

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(unaudited)

1.BASIS OF PRESENTATION, DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Organization

References to “the partnership” in the consolidated financial statements and notes to the consolidated financial statements refer to Green Plains Partners LP and its subsidiaries.

Green Plains Holdings LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Green Plains Inc., serves as the general partner of the partnership. References to (i) “the general partner” and “Green Plains Holdings” refer to Green Plains Holdings LLC; (ii) “the parent,” “the sponsor” and “Green Plains” refer to Green Plains Inc.; and (iii) “Green Plains Trade” refers to Green Plains Trade Group LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Green Plains.

Consolidated Financial Statements

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the partnership and its controlled subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions are eliminated on a consolidated basis for reporting purposes. Results for the interim periods presented are not necessarily indicative of the expected results for the entire year.

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP for interim financial information and instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Because they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP, the consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the partnership’s ~~2018~~2019 annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2018,~~2019, as filed with the SEC on February 20, ~~2019.~~2020.

The partnership accounts for its interest in joint ventures using the equity method of accounting, with its investment recorded at the acquisition cost plus the partnership’s share of equity in undistributed earnings or losses and reduced by distributions received.

~~Reclassifications~~

~~Certain prior year amounts were reclassified to conform to the current year presentation. These reclassifications did not affect total revenues, costs and expenses, net income, or partners’ deficit.~~

Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Consolidated Financial Statements

Preparation of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements, and revenues and expenses during the reporting period. The partnership bases its estimates on historical experience and assumptions it believes are proper and reasonable under the circumstances. The partnership regularly evaluates the appropriateness of these estimates and assumptions. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Key accounting policies, including, but not limited to, those related to revenue recognition, depreciation of property and equipment, asset retirement obligations, operating leases, and impairment of long-lived assets and goodwill, are impacted significantly by judgments, assumptions and estimates used to prepare the consolidated financial statements.

~~Table of Contents~~

Description of Business

The partnership provides fuel storage and transportation services by owning, operating, developing and acquiring ethanol and fuel storage ~~tanks,~~ terminals, transportation assets and other related assets and businesses. The partnership is its parent’s primary downstream logistics provider to support the parent’s approximately 1.1 bgy ethanol marketing and distribution business since the partnership’s assets are the principal method of storing and delivering the ethanol its parent produces. The ethanol produced by the parent is predominantly fuel grade, made principally from starch extracted from corn, and is primarily used for blending with gasoline. Ethanol currently comprises approximately 10% of the U.S. gasoline market and is an economical source of octane and oxygenates for blending into the fuel supply. The partnership does not take ownership of, or receive any payments based on the value of the ethanol, other fuels or products it handles. As a result, the partnership does not have any direct exposure to fluctuations in commodity prices.

Table of Contents

Revenue Recognition

The partnership recognizes revenue when obligations under the terms of a contract with a customer are satisfied. Generally, this occurs with the completion of services or the transfer of control of products to the customer or another specified third party. Operating lease revenue related to minimum volume commitments is recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. ToUnder the terms of the storage and throughput agreement with Green Plains Trade, to the extent shortfalls associated with minimum volume commitments in the previous four quarters continue to exist, volumes in excess of the minimum volume commitment are applied to those shortfalls. Remaining excess volumes generating operating lease revenue are recognized as incurred.

The partnership generates a substantial portion of its revenues under fee-based commercial agreements with Green Plains Trade. Please refer to Note 2 - Revenue to the consolidated financial statements for further details.

Operations and Maintenance Expenses

The partnership’s operations and maintenance expenses consist primarily of lease expenses related to the transportation assets, labor expenses, outside contractor expenses, insurance premiums, repairs and maintenance expenses, and utility costs. These expenses also include fees for certain management, maintenance and operational services to support the storage and terminal facilities, trucks, and leased railcar fleet allocated by Green Plains under the operational services and secondment agreement.

Concentrations of Credit Risk

In the normal course of business, the partnership is exposed to credit risk resulting from the possibility a loss may occur due to failure of another party to perform according to the terms of their contract. The partnership provides fuel storage and transportation services for various parties with a significant portion of its revenues earned from Green Plains Trade. The partnership continually monitors its credit risk exposure and concentrations. Please refer to Note 2 – Revenue and Note 1011 – Related Party Transactions to the consolidated financial statements for additional information.

Segment Reporting

The partnership accounts for segment reporting in accordance with ASC 280, Segment Reporting, which establishes standards for entities reporting information about the operating segments and geographic areas in which they operate. Management evaluated how its chief operating decision maker has organized the partnership for purposes of making operating decisions and assessing performance, and concluded it has ~~one~~1 reportable segment.

Asset Retirement Obligations

The partnership records an ARO for the fair value of the estimated costs to retire a tangible long-lived asset in the period incurred if it can be reasonably estimated, which is subsequently adjusted for accretion expense. Corresponding asset retirement costs are capitalized as a long-lived asset and depreciated on a straight-line basis over the asset’s remaining useful life. The expected present value technique used to calculate the fair value of the AROs includes assumptions about costs, settlement dates, interest accretion, and inflation. Changes in assumptions, such as the amount or timing of estimated cash flows, could increase or decrease the AROs. The partnership’s AROs are based on legal obligations to perform remedial activity related to land, machinery and equipment when certain operating leases expire.

~~Table of Contents~~

~~Recent Accounting Pronouncements~~

~~On January 1, 2019, the partnership adopted the amended guidance in ASC 842,~~ ~~Leases~~. Please refer to Note 95 – ~~Commitments and Contingencies~~Asset Retirement Obligations to the consolidated financial statements for ~~further details.~~additional information.

Table of Contents

2. REVENUE

Revenue Recognition

Revenue by Source

The following table disaggregates our revenue by major source for the three months ended March 31, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018~~2019 (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended March 31,				Three Months Ended ‎March 31,
	2019		2018		2020		2019
Revenues
Service revenues
Terminal services	$	2,566	$	2,281	$	2,085	$	2,566
Trucking and other		895		1,083		1,168		895
Railcar transportation services		-		26
Total service revenues		3,461		3,390		3,253		3,461
Leasing revenues (1)
Storage and throughput services		11,785		14,642		11,785		11,785
Railcar transportation services		5,619		7,443		5,124		5,619
Terminal services		222		410		109		222
Total leasing revenues		17,626		22,495		17,018		17,626
Total revenues	$	21,087	$	25,885	$	20,271	$	21,087

(1) Leasing revenues do not represent revenues recognized from contracts with customers under ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, and are accounted for under ASC 842, Leases.

Terminal Services Revenue

The partnership provides terminal services and logistics solutions to Green Plains Trade, and other customers, through its fuel terminal facilities under various terminal service agreements, some of which have minimum volume commitments. Revenue generated by these terminals is disaggregated between service revenue and leasing ~~revenue in accordance with the new revenue standard.~~revenue. If Green Plains, or other customers, fail to meet their minimum volume commitments during the applicable term, a deficiency payment equal to the deficient volume multiplied by the applicable fee will be charged. Deficiency payments related to the partnership’s terminal services revenue may not be utilized as credits toward future volumes. At terminals where customers have shared use of terminal and tank storage assets, revenue is generated from contracts with customers and accounted for as service revenue. This service revenue is recognized at the point in time when product is withdrawn from tank storage.

At terminals where a customer is predominantly provided exclusive use of the terminal or tank storage assets, the partnership is considered a lessor as part of an operating lease agreement. Revenue is recognized over the term of the lease based on the minimum volume commitment or total actual throughput if in excess of the minimum volume commitment.

Trucking and Other Revenue

The partnership transports ethanol, natural gasoline, other refined fuels and feedstocks by truck from identified receipt points to various delivery points. Trucking revenue is recognized over time based on the percentage of total miles traveled, which is on average less than 100 miles.

Table of Contents

Railcar Transportation Services Revenue

Under the rail transportation services agreement, Green Plains Trade is obligated to use the partnership to transport ethanol and other fuels from receipt points identified by Green Plains Trade to nominated delivery points. Green Plains Trade is required to pay the partnership fees for the minimum railcar volumetric capacity provided, regardless of utilization of that capacity. However, Green Plains Trade is not charged for railcar volumetric capacity that is not available for use due to inspections, upgrades or routine repairs and maintenance. Revenue associated with the rail transportation services fee is considered leasing revenue and is recognized over the term of the lease based on the actual average daily railcar volumetric capacity provided. The partnership may also charge Green Plains Trade a related services fee for logistical operations management of railcar volumetric capacity utilized by Green Plains Trade which is not provided by the partnership. Revenue associated with the related services fee is also considered leasing revenue and recognized over the term of the lease based on the average volumetric capacity for which services are provided.

Storage and Throughput Revenue

The partnership generates leasing revenue from its storage and throughput agreement with Green Plains Trade based on contractual rates charged for the handling, storage and throughput of ethanol. Under this agreement, Green Plains Trade is required to pay the partnership a fee for a minimum volume commitment regardless of the actual volume delivered. If Green Plains Trade fails to meet its minimum volume commitment during any quarter, the partnership will charge Green Plains Trade a deficiency payment equal to the deficient volume multiplied by the applicable fee. The deficiency payment may be applied as a credit toward volumes delivered by Green Plains Trade in excess of the minimum volume commitment during the following four quarters, after which time any unused credits will expire. Revenue is recognized over the term of the lease based on the minimum volume commitment or total actual throughput if in excess of the minimum volume ~~commitment.~~commitment and no deficiency related credits are available for use.

Payment Terms

The partnership has standard payment terms, which vary depending on the nature of the services provided, with the majority of terms falling within 10 to 30 days after transfer of control or completion of services. Contracts generally do not include a significant financing component in instances where the timing of revenue recognition differs from the timing of invoicing.

Major Customers

Revenue from Green Plains Trade Group was ~~$18.8~~$19.0 million and ~~$24.3~~$18.8 million for the three months ended March 31, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018,~~2019, respectively, which exceeds 10% of the partnership's total revenue.

Contract Liabilities

The partnership records unearned revenue when consideration is received, or such consideration is unconditionally due, from a customer prior to transferring goods or services to the customer under the terms of service and lease agreements. Unearned revenue from service agreements, which represents a contract liability, is recorded for fees that have been charged to the customer prior to the completion of performance obligations, and is generally recognized in the subsequent quarter.

The following table reflects the changes in our unearned revenue from service agreements, which is recorded in accrued and other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets, for the three months ended March 31, ~~2019~~2020 (in thousands):


	Amount
Balance at January 1, ~~2019~~2020	$	~~248~~ 230
Revenue recognized included in beginning balance		~~(248)~~ (230)
Net additions		~~101~~ 225
Balance at March 31, ~~2019~~2020	$	~~101~~ 225

The partnership expects to recognize all of the unearned revenue associated with service agreements from contracts with customers as of March 31, ~~2019,~~2020, in the subsequent quarter when the product is withdrawn from tank storage.

Table of Contents

~~3. DEBT~~

3. GOODWILL

The partnership currently has 1 reporting unit, BlendStar, to which goodwill is assigned. The decline in the partnership’s stock price caused a decline in the partnership’s market capitalization during the three months ended March 31, 2020. As such, the partnership determined a triggering event had occurred that required an interim impairment assessment for its Blendstar reporting unit as of March 31, 2020. Significant assumptions inherent in the valuation methodologies for goodwill were employed and include, but are not limited to, market capitalization, prospective financial information, growth rates, discount rates, inflationary factors, and cost of capital. Based on the partnership’s quantitative evaluation, it was determined that the fair value of the Blendstar reporting unit exceeded its carrying value. As a result, the partnership concluded that the goodwill assigned to the Blendstar reporting unit was not impaired, but could be at risk of future impairment. The partnership continues to believe that its long-term financial goals will be achieved. As a result of the analysis, the partnership did 0t record a goodwill impairment charge as of March 31, 2020.

4. DEBT

Revolving Credit Facility

Green Plains Operating Company has a $200.0 million revolving credit facility, which matures on July 1, 2020, to fund working capital, acquisitions, distributions, capital expenditures and other general partnership purposes. ~~The credit facility can be increased by an additional $20.0 million without the consent of the lenders.~~ Advances under the credit facility are subject to a floating interest rate based on the preceding fiscal quarter’s consolidated leverage ratio at a base rate plus 1.25% to 2.00%, or LIBOR plus 2.25% to 3.00%. The unused portion of the credit facility is also subject to a commitment fee of 0.35% to 0.50%, depending on the preceding fiscal quarter’s consolidated leverage ratio.

The revolving credit facility is available for revolving loans, including sublimits of $30.0 million for swing line loans and $30.0 million for letters of credit. The revolving credit facility is guaranteed by the partnership, each of its existing subsidiaries, and any potential future domestic subsidiaries. As of March 31, ~~2019,~~2020, the revolving credit facility had an average interest rate of ~~5.51%~~3.95%.

The partnership’s obligations under the credit facility are secured by a first priority lien on (i) the capital stock of the partnership’s present and future subsidiaries, (ii) all of the partnership’s present and future personal property, such as investment property, general intangibles and contract rights, including rights under any agreements with Green Plains Trade, and (iii) all proceeds and products of the equity interests of the partnership’s present and future subsidiaries and its personal property. The terms impose affirmative and negative covenants, including restrictions on the partnership’s ability to incur additional debt, acquire and sell assets, create liens, invest capital, pay distributions and materially amend the partnership’s commercial agreements with Green Plains Trade. The credit facility also requires the partnership to maintain a maximum consolidated net leverage ratio of no more than 3.50x and a minimum consolidated interest coverage ratio of no less than 2.75x, each of which is calculated on a pro forma basis with respect to acquisitions and divestitures occurring during the applicable period. The consolidated leverage ratio is calculated by dividing total funded indebtedness minus the lesser of cash in excess of $5.0 million or $30.0 million by the sum of the four preceding fiscal quarters’ consolidated EBITDA. The consolidated interest coverage ratio is calculated by dividing the sum of the four preceding fiscal quarters’ consolidated EBITDA by the sum of the four preceding fiscal quarters’ interest charges.

The partnership is required to file a Form of Compliance Certificate attesting to its compliance under the revolving credit facility each quarter by the earlier of 45 days from the end of each such quarter or within 5 days of the SEC filing for such quarter or with respect to each fiscal year, the earlier of 90 days from the end of such fiscal year or within 15 days of the SEC filing for such fiscal year. As of March 31, 2020, the partnership was in full compliance with all covenants, and will report a consolidated leverage ratio of 2.47x and a consolidated interest coverage ratio of 6.49x.

The partnership had ~~$135.0~~$130.2 million and ~~$134.0~~$132.1 million of borrowings outstanding under the revolving credit facility as of March 31, ~~2019,~~2020, and December 31, ~~2018~~2019, respectively.

The partnership ~~had $63 thousand~~believes the carrying amount of its debt approximated fair value at both March 31, 2020 and ~~$75 thousand~~ December 31, 2019.

Table of ~~debt issuance costs recorded as~~Contents

The revolving credit facility, which is provided by a ~~direct reduction~~syndicate of financial institutions, will mature on July 1, 2020 unless extended by agreement of the ~~carrying value of~~lenders or replaced by another funding source. The partnership is currently working with its existing lender group to extend the credit facility. While the partnership has not formalized the credit facility or secured additional funding necessary to repay the loan, the partnership believes it is probable that it will source appropriate funding given the partnership’s ~~long-term~~consistent and stable fee-based cash flows, ongoing profitability, low debt asleverage and history of ~~March 31, 2019, and December 31, 2018, respectively.~~ obtaining financing on reasonable commercial terms. In the unlikely scenario that the partnership is unable to refinance its debt with the lenders, the partnership will consider other financing sources, including but not limited to, the restructuring or issuance of new debt with a different lending group, the issuance of additional common units, or other measures.

Covenant Compliance

The partnership, including all of its subsidiaries, was in compliance with its debt covenants as of March 31, ~~2019.~~2020.

~~4. DISPOSITIONS~~5. ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATIONS

On November 15, 2018, Green Plains closed on the sale of three of its ethanol plants located in Bluffton, Indiana, Lakota, Iowa, and Riga, Michigan to Valero Renewable Fuels Company, LLC (“Valero”). Correspondingly, the partnership’s storage assets located adjacent to such plants were sold to Green Plains for $120.9 million. As consideration,Under various lease agreements, the partnership ~~received from its parent 8.7 million Green Plains units~~has AROs when certain machinery and ~~a portion of~~equipment are disposed or operating leases expire. During the ~~general partner interest equating to 0.2 million equivalent limited partner units to maintain the general partner’s 2% interest. These units were retired upon receipt. In addition,~~three months ended March 31, 2020, the partnership ~~also received cash consideration~~reassessed the estimated cost of ~~$2.7 million from Valero for the assignment of certain~~AROs related to its railcar operating leases. ~~This transaction was accounted for~~The reassessment resulted in a change in estimated costs that has been reflected as ~~a transfer between entities under common control~~an increase of $0.3 million to the AROs and ~~was approved by~~corresponding long-lived assets on the ~~conflicts committee.~~consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2020.

~~Table of Contents~~

The following ~~is a summary of assets and liabilities disposed of~~table summarizes the change in the liability for the AROs during the three months ended March 31, 2020 (in thousands):


~~Total consideration received~~	$		~~120,900~~
~~Identifiable assets and liabilities disposed of:~~		Amount
~~Property and equipment, net~~Balance at January 1, 2020		~~4,192~~
~~Asset retirement obligations~~$		~~(425)~~
~~Total identifiable net assets~~		~~3,767~~
~~Units retired:~~		3,065
~~Common units - Green Plains~~Additional asset retirement obligations incurred		~~118,482~~ 67
~~General partners interest~~Liabilities settled		~~2,418~~ (44)
~~Total units retired~~Accretion expense		~~120,900~~ 62
~~Partners' deficit effect~~Change in estimate	$	~~(3,767)~~ 323
Balance at March 31, 2020	$	3,473

In conjunction with the disposition, the partnership amended the 1) omnibus agreement, 2) operational services agreement, 3) ethanol storage and throughput agreement, and (4) rail transportation services agreement. Please refer to ~~Note 10 – Related Party Transactions~~ ~~to the consolidated financial statements for additional information.~~

5.6. UNIT-BASED COMPENSATION

The ~~board of directors of the general partner adopted the LTIP upon completion of the IPO. The LTIP is~~partnership has a long-term incentive plan (LTIP) intended to promote the interests of the partnership, its general partner and affiliates by providing unit-based incentive compensation awards to employees, consultants and directors to encourage superior performance. The LTIP reserves 2,500,000 common limited partner units for issuance in the form ofoptions, restricted units, phantom units, distribution equivalent rights, substitute awards, unit appreciation rights, unit awards, profit interest units or other unit-based awards. The partnership measures unit-based compensation ~~grants~~ at fair value on the grant date, ~~and~~with no adjustments for estimated forfeitures. The partnership records noncash compensation expense related to the awards over the requisite service ~~period.~~period on a straight-line basis.

There was no change in the number of non-vested unit-based awards during the three months ended March 31, ~~2019.~~2020.

Compensation costs related to the unit-based awards of $79 thousand ~~and $60 thousand~~ were recognized during both the three months ended March 31, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018, respectively.~~2019. As of March 31, ~~2019,~~2020, there was ~~$79~~$80 thousand of unrecognized compensation costs from unit-based compensation awards.

Table of Contents

7. PARTNERS’ DEFICIT

Changes in partners’ deficit are as follows (in thousands):


	Limited Partners								Limited Partners
	Common Units- Public		Common Units- Green Plains		General Partner			Total	Common Units- ‎Public		Common Units- ‎Green Plains		General Partner			Total
Balance, December 31, 2018	$	115,352	$	(186,635)	$	(1,171)	$	(72,454)
Balance, December 31, 2019									$	114,006	$	(188,304)	$	(1,449)	$	(75,747)
Quarterly cash distributions to unitholders ($0.475 per unit)		(5,487)		(5,504)		(278)		(11,269)		(5,498)		(5,504)		(278)		(11,280)
Net income		5,014		5,029		205		10,248		5,078		5,084		207		10,369
Unit-based compensation, including general partner net contributions		79		-		-		79		79		-		-		79
Balance, March 31, 2019	$	114,958	$	(187,110)	$	(1,244)	$	(73,396)
Balance, March 31, 2020									$	113,665	$	(188,724)	$	(1,520)	$	(76,579)


	Limited Partners
	Common Units- ‎Public		Common Units- ‎Green Plains		General Partner			Total
Balance, December 31, 2018	$	115,352	$	(186,635)	$	(1,171)	$	(72,454)
Quarterly cash distributions to unitholders ($0.475 per unit)		(5,487)		(5,504)		(278)		(11,269)
Net income		5,014		5,029		205		10,248
Unit-based compensation, including general partner net contributions		79		-		-		79
Balance, March 31, 2019	$	114,958	$	(187,110)	$	(1,244)	$	(73,396)

~~Table of Contents~~

Limited Partners

Common Units-
Public

Common Units-
Green Plains

Subordinated Units-
Green Plains

General Partner

Total
Balance, December 31, 2017

$
115,747

$
(38,505)

$
(139,376)

$
(712)

$
(62,846)
Quarterly cash distributions to unitholders ($0.470 per unit)

(5,420)

(2,063)

(7,468)

(355)

(15,306)
Net income

4,751

1,808

6,546

267

13,372
Unit-based compensation, including general partner net contributions

60

-

-

-

60
Balance, March 31, 2018

$
115,138

$
(38,760)

$
(140,298)

$
(800)

$
(64,720)

There was no0 change in the number of common limited partner units outstanding during the three months ended March 31, ~~2019.~~2020.

~~Subordinated Unit Conversion~~

The requirements under the partnership agreement for the conversion of all of the outstanding subordinated units into common units were satisfied upon the payment of the distribution with respect to the quarter ended June 30, 2018. Accordingly, the subordination period ended on August 13, 2018, the first business day after the date of the distribution payment, and all of the 15,889,642 outstanding subordinated units were converted into common units on a one-for-one basis. The conversion of the subordinated units did not impact the amount of cash distributions paid or the total number of outstanding units.

Issuance of Additional Securities

The partnership agreement authorizes the partnership to issue unlimited additional partnership interests on the terms and conditions determined by the general partner without unitholder approval.

Cash Distribution Policy

Quarterly distributions are made from available cash within 45 days after the end of each calendar ~~quarter.~~quarter, assuming the partnership has available cash. Available cash generally means all cash and cash equivalents on hand at the end of that quarter less cash reserves established by the general partner, including those for future capital expenditures, future acquisitions and anticipated future debt service requirements, plus all or any portion of the cash on hand resulting from working capital borrowings made subsequent to the end of that quarter.

The general partner also holds incentive distribution rights that entitles it to receive increasing percentages, up to 48%, of available cash distributed from operating surplus, as defined in the partnership agreement, in excess of $0.46 per unit per quarter. The maximum distribution of 48% does not include any distributions the general partner or its affiliates may receive on its general partner interest or common ~~units, or subordinated~~ units.

On February ~~8, 2019,~~7, 2020, the partnership distributed $11.3 million to unitholders of record as of ~~February 1, 2019,~~January 31, 2020, related to the quarterly cash distribution of $0.475 per unit that was declared on January ~~17, 2019,~~16, 2020, for the quarter ended December 31, ~~2018.~~2019.

On April ~~18, 2019,~~16, 2020, the board of directors of the general partner declared a quarterly cash distribution of ~~$0.475~~$0.12 per unit, or approximately ~~$11.3~~$2.8 million, for the quarter ended March 31, ~~2019.~~2020. The distribution is payable on May ~~10, 2019,~~8, 2020, to unitholders of record at the close of business on May ~~3, 2019.~~1, 2020.

Table of Contents

The total cash distributions declared for the three months ended March 31, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018,~~2019, are as follows (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended March 31,				Three Months Ended ‎March 31,
	2019		2018		2020		2019
General partner distributions	$	225	$	310	$	57	$	225
Incentive distributions		53		73		-		53
Total distributions to general partner		278		383		57		278

Limited partner common units - public		5,487		5,478		1,389		5,487
Limited partner common units - Green Plains		5,504		2,085		1,390		5,504
Limited partner subordinated units - Green Plains		-		7,547
Total distributions to limited partners		10,991		15,110		2,779		10,991
Total distributions declared	$	11,269	$	15,493	$	2,836	$	11,269

8. EARNINGS PER UNIT

The partnership computes earnings per unit using the two-class method. Earnings per unit applicable to common units ~~and to subordinated units prior to the expiration of the subordination period,~~ is calculated by dividing the respective limited partners’ interest in net income by the weighted average number of common ~~and subordinated~~ units outstanding during the period, adjusted for the dilutive effect of any outstanding dilutive securities. Diluted earnings per limited partner unit was the same as basic earnings per limited partner unit as there were no0 potentially dilutivecommon ~~or subordinated~~ units outstanding as of March 31, ~~2019.~~2020. The following tables show the calculation of earnings per limited partner unit – basic and diluted (in thousands, except for per unit data):


	Three Months Ended March 31, 2019							Three Months Ended ‎March 31, 2020
	Limited Partner Common Units			General Partner		Total		Limited Partner ‎ Common Units		General Partner		Total
Net income:			��
Distributions declared	$	10,991		$	278	$	11,269	$	2,779	$	57	$	2,836
Earnings less than distributions		(948)			(73)		(1,021)
Earnings in excess of distributions									7,383		150		7,533
Total net income	$	10,043		$	205	$	10,248	$	10,162	$	207	$	10,369

Weighted-average units outstanding - basic and diluted		23,119							23,138

Earnings per limited partner unit - basic and diluted	$	0.43						$	0.44



	Three Months Ended March 31, 2018								Three Months Ended ‎March 31, 2019
	Limited Partner Common Units		Limited Partner Subordinated Units (1)		General Partner		Total		Limited Partner ‎ Common Units		General Partner		Total
Net income:
Distributions declared	$	7,563	$	7,547	$	383	$	15,493	$	10,991	$	278	$	11,269
Earnings less than distributions		(1,004)		(1,001)		(116)		(2,121)		(948)		(73)		(1,021)
Total net income	$	6,559	$	6,546	$	267	$	13,372	$	10,043	$	205	$	10,248

Weighted-average units outstanding - basic and diluted		15,922		15,890						23,119

Earnings per limited partner unit - basic and diluted	$	0.41	$	0.41					$	0.43

~~(1) The subordinated units converted to common units on a one-for-one basis in August 2018 (see~~ ~~Note 6 – Partners’ Deficit).~~

Table of Contents

8.9. INCOME TAXES

The partnership is a limited partnership, which is not subject to federal income taxes. The general partner and the unitholders are responsible for paying federal and state income taxes on their share of the partnership’s taxable income. However, the partnership owns a subsidiary that is taxed as a corporation for federal and state income tax purposes. In addition, the partnership is subject to state income taxes in certain states. As a result, the financial statements reflect a provision or benefit for such income taxes.

The partnership recognizes uncertainties in income taxes based upon the technical merits of the position, and measures the maximum benefit and degree of likelihood to determine the tax liability in the financial statements.

9.10. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

~~Adoption of ASC 842~~

~~On January 1, 2019, the partnership adopted the amended guidance in ASC 842,~~ ~~Leases~~, and all related amendments (“new lease standard”) and applied it to all leases using the optional transition method which requires the amended guidance to be applied at the date of adoption. The standard does not require the guidance to be applied to the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements. As such, comparative information has not been restated and continues to be reported under the accounting standards in effect for those periods. The new lease standard had a material impact on the partnership’s consolidated balance sheets, increasing total assets and total liabilities by $39.7 million upon adoption. It did not have a material impact on the consolidated statement of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2019.

~~The impact on the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2018 for the adoption of the new lease standard was as follows (in thousands):~~

Balance at December 31, 2018

Adjustments Due to ASC 842

Balance at January 1, 2019

(audited)

Balance sheet

Assets

Operating lease right-of-use assets

$
-

$
39,685

$
39,685

Liabilities

Operating lease current liabilities

-

13,534

13,534
Deferred lease liabilities

843

(843)

-
Operating lease long-term liabilities

-

26,994

26,994

The partnership’s leases do not specify an implicit interest rate. Therefore, the incremental borrowing rate was used based on information available at commencement date to determine the present value of future payments.

~~Practical Expedients~~

Under the new lease standard, companies may elect various practical expedients upon adoption. The partnership elected the package of practical expedients related to transition, which states that an entity need not reassess initial direct costs for existing leases, the lease classification for any expired or existing leases, and whether any expired or existing contracts are or contain leases.

The partnership elected to utilize a portfolio approach for lease classification, which allows for an entity to group together leases with similar characteristics provided that its application does not create a material difference when compared to accounting for the leases at a contract level. For the partnership’s railcar leases, the partnership elected to combine the railcars within each contract rider and account for each contract rider as an individual lease.

The partnership also elected the practical expedient for lessees to include both the lease and non-lease components as a single component and account for them as a lease. Certain of the partnership’s railcar agreements provide for maintenance costs to be the responsibility of the partnership as incurred or charged by the lessor. This maintenance cost is a non-lease component that the partnership elected to combine with the monthly rental payment and account for the total cost as operating lease expense. In addition, the partnership has a land lease that contains a non-lease component for the handling

~~Table of Contents~~

~~and unloading services the landlord provides. The partnership elected to combine the cost of services with the land lease cost and account for the total as operating lease expense.~~

The lessor practical expedient to combine both the lease and non-lease components and account for them as a lease was applied by class of underlying asset. The storage and throughput agreement consists of lease costs paid by Green Plains Trade for the rental of the terminal facilities as well as non-lease costs for the throughput services provided by the partnership. For this agreement, the partnership elected to combine the facility rental revenue and the service revenue and account for the total as leasing revenue. The railcar transportation services agreement consists of lease costs paid by Green Plains Trade for the use of the partnership’s railcar assets as well as non-lease costs for logistical operations management and other services. For this agreement, the partnership elected to combine the railcar rental revenue and the service revenue and account for the total as leasing revenue.

A lessee may elect not to apply the recognition requirements in the new lease standard for short-term leases. Instead, the lease payments may be recognized into profit or loss on a straight-line basis over the lease term. The partnership has elected to use this short-term lease exemption, and therefore will not record a lease liability or right-of-use asset for leases with a term of one year or less. The partnership did not incur any short-term lease expense for the three months ended March 31, 2019.

Operating Lease Expense

The partnership leases certain facilities, parcels of land, and railcars with remaining terms ranging from less than one year to approximately ~~12.6~~11.6 years, including renewal options reasonably certain to be exercised for the land and facility leases. Railcar agreement renewals are not considered reasonably certain to be exercised as they are typically ~~renew with significantly different~~subject to significant market dynamics which impact the underlying ~~terms.~~terms of the agreements.

The partnership may sublease certain of its railcars to third parties on a short-term basis. These subleases are classified as operating leases, with the associated sublease revenue recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term.

The components of lease expense are as follows (in thousands):


	~~Three Months Ended~~ ~~March 31, 2019~~
~~Lease expense~~
~~Operating lease expense~~	$	~~4,209~~
~~Variable lease expense~~ ~~(1)~~		~~122~~
~~Total lease expense~~	$	~~4,331~~


	Three Months Ended ‎March 31,
	2020		2019
Lease expense
Operating lease expense	$	3,712	$	4,209
Variable lease (benefit) expense ⁽¹⁾		(150)		122
Total lease expense	$	3,562	$	4,331

(1) Represents amounts incurred in excess of the minimum payments required for the handling and unloading of railcars for a certain ~~land~~ lease, offset by railcar lease abatements provided by the lessor when railcars are out of service during periods of maintenance or upgrade.

Supplemental cash flow information related to operating leases is as follows (in thousands):


	~~Three Months Ended~~ ~~March 31, 2019~~
~~Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities:~~
~~Operating cash flows from operating leases~~	$	~~4,091~~


	Three Months Ended ‎March 31,
	2020		2019
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities:
Operating cash flows from operating leases	$	3,613	$	4,091

Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for lease obligations:
Operating leases		5,194		-

Supplemental balance sheet information related to operating leases is as follows:


	~~March 31, 2019~~
~~Weighted average remaining lease term~~		~~4.3 years~~

~~Weighted average discount rate~~		~~5.21%~~

1615

Table of Contents

Aggregate minimum lease payments under the operating lease agreements for the remainder of ~~2019~~2020 and in future years are as follows (in thousands):



Year Ending December 31,	Amount		Amount
2019	$	10,892
2020		12,315	$	11,473
2021		6,803		9,997
2022		5,183		8,456
2023		1,587		5,278
2024				3,453
Thereafter		4,794		4,181
Total	$	41,574	$	42,838
Less: Present value discount		(4,630)		(4,631)
Operating lease liabilities	$	36,944	$	38,207

The partnership has additional railcar operating leases that will commence in the second ~~quarter~~half of ~~2019~~2020 and the first half of 2021 to replace expiring leases, with estimated future minimum lease commitments of approximately ~~$6.7~~$26.6 million and lease terms of five years. The undiscounted amounts are not included in the tables above.

~~Aggregate minimum lease payments remaining under the operating lease agreements as of December 31, 2018 are as follows (in thousands):~~

Year Ending December 31,

Amount
2019

$
14,180
2020

11,843
2021

6,842
2022

4,758
2023

1,164
Thereafter

4,028
Total

$
42,815

Lease Revenue

The components of lease revenue are as follows (in thousands):


	~~Three Months Ended~~ ~~March 31, 2019~~
~~Lease revenue~~
~~Operating lease revenue~~	$	~~17,334~~
~~Variable lease revenue~~ ~~(1)~~		68
~~Sublease revenue~~		~~224~~
~~Total lease revenue~~	$	~~17,626~~


	Three Months Ended ‎March 31,
	2020		2019
Lease revenue
Operating lease revenue	$	16,954	$	17,334
Variable lease revenue ⁽¹⁾		(13)		68
Sublease revenue		77		224
Total lease revenue	$	17,018	$	17,626

(1) Represents amounts delivered by Green Plains Trade and other customers in excess of various minimum volume commitments, as well as the difference between the contracted railcar volumetric capacity and the actual amount provided to Green Plains Trade during the period.

~~Table of Contents~~

In accordance with the amended storage and throughput agreement, Green Plains Trade is obligated to deliver a minimum volume of 235.7 mmgper calendar quarter to the partnership’s storage facilities and pay $0.05 per gallon on all volume it throughputs associated with the agreement. While this agreement contains a provision stating that the rate could potentially increase above the $0.05 per gallon on the sixth anniversary of the effective date, the potential increase would be based on a percentage change in the Bureau of Labor Producer Price Index, which cannot be predicted at this time. The remaining lease term for this agreement is approximately ~~9.3~~8.3 years, with automatic ~~one-year~~one year renewal periods in which either party has the right to terminate the contract. Due to the unilateral right to termination during the renewal period, the lease contract would no longer contain enforceable rights or obligations. Therefore, the lease term does not include the successive ~~one-year~~one year renewal periods. Anticipated minimum operating lease revenue under this agreement assuming a consistent rate of $0.05 per gallon for the remainder of ~~2019~~2020 and in future years is as follows (in thousands):



Year Ending December 31,	Amount		Amount
2019	$	35,355
2020		47,140	$	35,355
2021		47,140		47,140
2022		47,140		47,140
2023		47,140		47,140
2024				47,140
Thereafter		212,130		164,990
Total	$	436,045	$	388,905

In accordance with the amended rail transportation services agreement with Green Plains Trade, Green Plains Trade is required to pay the rail transportation services fee for railcar volumetric capacity provided by the partnership. The remaining lease term for this agreement is approximately ~~6.3~~5.3 years, with automatic ~~one-year~~one year renewal periods in which either party has the right to terminate the contract. Due to the unilateral right to termination during the renewal period, the lease contract would no longer contain enforceable rights or obligations. Therefore, the lease term does not include the successive ~~one-year~~ one year

Table of Contents

renewal periods. Under the terms of the agreement, Green Plains Trade is not required to pay for volumetric capacity that is not available due to inspections, upgrades, or routine repairs and maintenance. As a result, the actual volumetric capacity billed may be reduced based on the amount of volumetric capacity available for use during any applicable period. Anticipated minimum operating lease revenue under this agreement for the remainder of ~~2019~~2020 and in future years is as follows (in thousands):


Year Ending December 31,	Amount		Amount
2019	$	14,252
2020		17,255	$	15,806
2021		9,983		14,047
2022		7,417		11,839
2023		1,109		6,097
2024				3,538
Thereafter		-		608
Total	$	50,016	$	51,935

The partnership provides terminal services and logistics solutions to certain customers under various terminal service agreements, some of which have minimum volume commitments. At terminals where a customer is predominantly provided exclusive use of the terminal or tank storage assets, the partnership is considered a lessor as part of an operating lease agreement. Revenue is recognized over the term of the lease based on the minimum volume commitment, or total actual throughput if in excess of the minimum volume commitment. The partnership currently has one such agreement, with a remaining lease ~~terms for these agreements range from less than one year to~~term of approximately ~~6.4~~5.4 years, ~~some of~~ which ~~contain~~includes renewal options reasonably certain to be exercised. Minimum operating lease revenue for ~~these terminals~~this terminal for the remainder of ~~2019~~2020 and in future years is as follows (in thousands):


Year Ending December 31,	Amount		Amount
2019	$	106
2020		74	$	54
2021		74		74
2022		74		74
2023		74		74
2024				74
Thereafter		123		48
Total	$	525	$	398

~~Table of Contents~~

Other Commitments and Contingencies

The partnership has agreements for contracted services with certain vendors that require the partnership to pay minimum monthly amounts, which expire on various dates. These agreements do not contain an identified asset and therefore are not considered operating leases. The partnership satisfied the minimum commitments under these agreements during the three months ended March 31, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018.~~2019. Aggregate minimum payments under these agreements for the remainder of ~~2019~~2020 and in future years are as follows (in thousands):



Year Ending December 31,	Amount		Amount
2019	$	498
2020		153	$	499
2021		157		138
2022		156		157
2023		-		-
2024				-
Thereafter		-		-
Total	$	964	$	794

Legal

The partnership may be involved in litigation that arises during the ordinary course of business. ~~The~~Currently, the partnership is not ~~currently~~ party to any material litigation.

Table of Contents

~~10.~~

11. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

The partnership engages in various related party transactions with Green Plains and subsidiaries of Green Plains. Green Plains provides a variety of shared services to the partnership, including general management, accounting and finance, payroll and human resources, information technology, legal, communications and treasury activities. These costs are proportionally allocated by Green Plains to its subsidiaries based on common financial metrics management believes are reasonable. The partnership recorded expenses related to these shared services of ~~$0.9~~$0.8 million and ~~$1.2~~$0.9 million for the three months ended March 31, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018,~~2019, respectively. In addition, the partnership reimburses Green Plains for wages and benefit costs of employees directly performing services on its behalf. Green Plains may also pay certain direct costs on behalf of the partnership, which are reimbursed by the partnership. The partnership believes the consolidated financial statements reflect all material costs of doing business related to its operations, including expenses incurred by other entities on its behalf.

Omnibus Agreement

The partnership has entered into an omnibus agreement, as amended, with Green Plains and its affiliates which, among other terms and conditions, addresses the partnership’s obligation to reimburse Green Plains for direct or allocated costs and expenses incurred by Green Plains for general and administrative services; the prohibition of Green Plains and its subsidiaries from owning, operating or investing in any business that owns or operates fuel terminals or fuel transportation assets; the partnership’s right of first offer to acquire assets if Green Plains decides to sell them; a nontransferable, nonexclusive, royalty-free license to use the Green Plains trademark and name; the allocation of taxes among the parent, the partnership and its affiliates and the parent’s preparation and filing of tax returns; and an indemnity by Green Plains for environmental and other liabilities.

If Green Plains or its affiliates cease to control the general partner, then either Green Plains or the partnership may terminate the omnibus agreement, provided that (i) the indemnification obligations of the parties survive according to their respective terms; and (ii) Green Plains’ obligation to reimburse the partnership for operational failures survives according to its terms.

~~Table of Contents~~

Operating Services and Secondment Agreement

The general partner has entered into an operational services and secondment agreement, as amended, with Green Plains. Under the terms of the agreement, Green Plains seconds employees to the general partner to provide management, maintenance and operational functions for the partnership, including regulatory matters, health, environment, safety and security programs, operational services, emergency response, employee training, finance and administration, human resources, business operations and planning. The seconded personnel are under the direct management and supervision of the general partner who reimburses the parent for the cost of the seconded employees, including wages and benefits. If a seconded employee does not devote 100% of his or her time providing services to the general partner, the general partner reimburses the parent for a prorated portion of the employee’s overall wages and benefits based on the percentage of time the employee spent working for the general partner.

Under the operational services and secondment agreement, Green Plains will indemnify the partnership from any claims, losses or liabilities incurred by the partnership, including third-party claims, arising from their performance of the operational services secondment agreement; provided, however, that Green Plains will not be obligated to indemnify the partnership for any claims, losses or liabilities arising out of the partnership’s gross negligence, willful misconduct or bad faith with respect to any services provided under the operational services and secondment agreement.

Commercial Agreements

The partnership has various fee-based commercial agreements with Green Plains Trade, including:

10-year storage and throughput agreement, expiring on June 30, 2028;

10-year rail transportation services agreement, expiring on June 30, 2025;

1-year trucking transportation agreement, initially expiring on May 31, 2020, extended through May 31, 2021 through an automatic renewal;

Terminal services agreement for the Birmingham, Alabama unit train terminal, expiring on December 31, 2022; and

Various other terminal services agreements for other fuel terminal facilities, each with Green Plains Trade.

~~10-year storage and throughput agreement, expiring on June 30, 2028;~~

~~10-year rail transportation services agreement, expiring on June 30, 2025;~~

Table of Contents

~~1-year trucking transportation agreement, expiring on May 31, 2019;~~

~~Terminal services agreement for the Birmingham, Alabama unit train terminal, expiring December 31, 2019; and~~

~~Various other terminal services agreements for other fuel terminal facilities, each with Green Plains Trade.~~

The storage and throughput, rail transportation services, and trucking transportation agreements have various automatic renewal terms if not cancelled by either party within specified timeframes. Please refer to Item 15 – Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedule in our 2019 annual report ~~on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018,~~for further details.

The storage and throughput agreement and terminal services agreements are supported by minimum volume commitments. The rail transportation services agreement is supported by minimum take-or-pay volumetric capacity commitments.

Under the storage and throughput agreement, as amended, Green Plains Trade is obligated to deliver a minimum volume of 235.7 mmg of product per calendar quarter to the partnership’s storage facilities and pay $0.05 per gallon on all volume it throughputs. If Green Plains Trade fails to meet its minimum volume commitment during any quarter, Green Plains Trade will pay the partnership a deficiency payment equal to the deficient volume multiplied by the applicable fee. The deficiency payment may be applied as a credit toward payments due on future volumes delivered by Green Plains Trade in excess of the minimum volume commitment during the following four quarters, after which time ~~any unused credits~~this option will expire. ~~The partnership charged Green Plains Trade a deficiency payment in the amount of $4.0 million related to the minimum volume commitment for~~

For the three months ended March 31, 2020, Green Plains Trade exceeded its minimum volume commitment and received a credit of $0.3 million, which was applied to the $4.0 million volume deficiency credit related to the three months ended March 31, 2019. The remaining balance of this credit of $3.7 million expired as of March 31, 2020. The cumulative minimum volume deficiency credits available to Green Plains Trade as of March 31, ~~2019~~2020 totaled ~~$7.0~~$0.5 million, of which ~~$3.0 million~~ will expire if unused by June 30, 2020. These credits have been previously recognized as revenue by the ~~end~~partnership, and as such, future volumes throughput by Green Plains Trade in excess of the ~~fourth quarter~~minimum volume commitment, up to the amount of ~~2019, and $4.0 million~~these credits, will ~~expire if unused by the end of the first quarter of 2020.~~not be recognized in revenue in future periods.

Under the rail transportation services agreement, Green Plains Trade is obligated to use the partnership to transport ethanol and other fuels from receipt points identified by Green Plains Trade to nominated delivery points. The average daily railcar volumetric capacity provided by the partnership was ~~83.4~~78.8 mmg and ~~99.2~~83.4 mmg, respectively, and the associated monthly fee was approximately ~~$0.0216~~$0.0214 and ~~$0.0252~~$0.0216 per gallon, respectively, during the three months ended March 31, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018.~~2019. The partnership’s leased railcar fleet consisted of approximately ~~2,840~~2,750 and ~~3,500~~2,840 railcars as of March 31, 2020 and 2019, ~~and 2018,~~ respectively.

~~Table of Contents~~

Green Plains Trade is also obligated to use the partnership for logistical operations management and other services related to average daily railcar volumetric capacity provided by Green Plains Trade, which was approximately ~~3.6~~3.5 mmg and ~~6.6~~3.6 mmg for the three months ended March 31, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018,~~2019, respectively. Green Plains Trade is obligated to pay a monthly fee of approximately $0.0013 per gallon for these services. In addition, Green Plains Trade reimburses the partnership for costs related to: (1) railcar switching and unloading fees; (2) increased costs related to changes in law or governmental regulation related to the specification, operation or maintenance of railcars; (3) demurrage charges, except when the charges are due to the partnership’s gross negligence or willful misconduct; and (4) fees related to rail transportation services under transportation contracts with third-party common carriers. As needed, Green Plains Trade ~~frequently~~ contracts with the partnership for additional railcar volumetric capacity during the normal course of business at comparable margins.

Under the trucking transportation agreement, Green Plains Trade pays the partnership to transport ethanol and other fuels by truck from identified receipt points to various delivery points. Green Plains Trade is obligated to pay a monthly trucking transportation services fee equal to the aggregate volume transported in a calendar month by the partnership’s trucks, multiplied by the applicable rate for each truck lane. A truck lane is defined as a specific and routine route of travel between a point of origin and point of destination. Rates for each truck lane are negotiated based on product, location, mileage and other factors. Green Plains Trade reimburses the partnership for costs related to: (1) truck switching and unloading fees; (2) increased costs related to changes in law or governmental regulation related to the specification, operation and maintenance of trucks; and (3) fees related to trucking transportation services under transportation contracts with third-party common carriers.

Under the existing Birmingham terminal services agreement, effective ~~January 1, 2017,~~ through December 31, ~~2019,~~2022, Green Plains Trade is obligated to throughput a minimum volume commitment of approximately ~~2.8~~8.3 mmg per month and pay associated throughput fees, as well as fees for ancillary services.

Table of Contents

The partnership recorded revenues from Green Plains Trade under the storage and throughput agreement and rail transportation services agreement of ~~$17.2~~$16.8 million and ~~$22.1~~$17.2 million for the three months ended March 31, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018,~~2019, respectively. The partnership recorded revenues from Green Plains Trade and other Green Plains subsidiaries related to trucking and terminal services of ~~$1.6~~$2.2 million and ~~$2.2~~$1.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019, ~~and 2018,~~ respectively.

Cash Distributions

The partnership distributed $5.8 ~~million and $9.9~~ million to Green Plains related to the quarterly cash distribution paid for both the three months ended March 31, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018, respectively.~~2019.

Equity Method Investment

The partnership entered into a project management agreement with NLR Energy Logistics LLC, effective June 23, 2017, in which NLR provided the partnership a fixed monthly fee to coordinate and manage the development, design, and construction of the Little Rock, Arkansas unit train terminal. Construction of the terminal was completed during the first quarter of 2018. The partnership recognized no income related to the project management agreement during the three months ended March 31, 2019, and $75 thousand of other income during the three months ended March 31, 2018. In addition, the partnership has recorded a receivable of ~~$51~~$23 thousand for various expenses to be reimbursed by NLR as of both March 31, ~~2019.~~

~~Other Related Party Revenues~~2020 and ~~Expenses~~

~~The partnership incurs expenses charged by a subsidiary of the parent for cleaning of its storage tanks. There were no tank cleaning expenses incurred for the three months ended March~~December 31, 2019. ~~The partnership incurred tank cleaning expense of $10 thousand for the three months ended March 31, 2018.~~

~~Table of Contents~~

~~11.~~12. EQUITY METHOD INVESTMENT

NLR Energy Logistics LLC

The partnership and Delek Renewables LLC have a 50/50 joint venture, NLR Energy Logistics LLC, which operates a unit train terminal in the Little Rock, Arkansas area with capacity to unload 110-car unit trains and provide approximately 100,000 barrels of storage. ~~Operations commenced at the beginning of the second quarter of 2018, and the first unit train was received in July 2018.~~ As of March 31, ~~2019,~~2020, the partnership's investment balance in the joint venture was ~~$3.9~~$4.5 million.

The partnership does not consolidate any part of the assets or liabilities or operating results of its equity method investee. The partnership’s share of net income or loss in the investee increases or decreases, as applicable, the carrying value of the investment. With respect to NLR, the partnership determined that this entity does not represent a variable interest entity and consolidation is not required. In addition, although the partnership has the ability to exercise significant influence over the joint venture through board representation and voting rights, all significant decisions require the consent of the other investor without regard to economic interest.

‎

~~Summarized Financial Information~~

The partnership reports its proportional share of equity method investee income (loss) on a one-month lag in the consolidated statements of operations. The following table presents combined summarized statement of operations data of our equity method investee for the three months ended February 28, 2019 and 2018 (amounts represent 100% of investee financial information in thousands, unaudited):

Three Months Ended
February 28,

2019

2018
Total revenues

$
816

$
-
Total operating expenses

387

26
Net income (loss)

$
429

$
(26)

2220

Table of Contents

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

The following discussion and analysis provides information we believe is relevant to understand our consolidated financial condition and results of operations. This discussion should be read in conjunction with our unaudited consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes contained in this report together with our ~~2018~~2019 annual report. The results of operations for the three months ended March 31, ~~2019,~~2020, are not necessarily indicative of the results we expect for the full year.

Cautionary Information Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

Forward-looking statements are made in accordance with safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements are based on current expectations that involve a number of risks and uncertainties and do not relate strictly to historical or current facts, but rather to plans and objectives for future operations. These statements may be identified by words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “continue,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “outlook,” “plan,” “predict,” “may,” “could,” “should,” “will” and similar expressions, as well as statements regarding future operating or financial performance or guidance, business strategy, environment, key trends and benefits of actual or planned acquisitions.

Factors that could cause actual results to differ from those expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements include those discussed in Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” of our ~~2018~~2019 annual report and in Part II, Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” in this report, or incorporated by reference. Specifically, we may experience fluctuations in future operating results due to disruption caused by health epidemics, such as the coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak; changes in general economic, market or business conditions; foreign imports of ethanol; fluctuations in demand for ethanol and other fuels; risks of accidents or other unscheduled shutdowns affecting our assets, including mechanical breakdown of equipment or infrastructure; risks associated with changes to federal policy or regulation; ability to comply with changing government usage mandates and regulations affecting the ethanol industry; price, availability and acceptance of alternative fuels and alternative fuel vehicles, and laws mandating such fuels or vehicles; changes in operational costs at our facilities and for our railcars; failure to realize the benefits projected for capital projects; competition; inability to successfully implement growth strategies; the supply of corn and other feedstocks; unusual or severe weather conditions and natural disasters; ability and willingness of parties with whom we have material relationships, including Green Plains Trade, to fulfill their obligations; labor and material shortages; changes in the availability of unsecured credit and changes affecting the credit markets in general; risks related to acquisition and disposition activities; and other risk factors detailed in our reports filed with the SEC.

We believe our expectations regarding future events are based on reasonable assumptions. However, these assumptions may not be accurate or account for all risks and uncertainties. Consequently, forward-looking statements are not guaranteed. Actual results may vary materially from those expressed or implied in our forward-looking statements. In addition, we are not obligated nor do we intend to update our forward-looking statements as a result of new information unless it is required by applicable securities laws. We caution investors not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which represent management’s views as of the date of this report or documents incorporated by reference.

Overview

Green Plains Partners provides fuel storage and transportation services by owning, operating, developing and acquiring ethanol and fuel storage ~~tanks,~~facilities, terminals, transportation assets and other related assets and businesses. We are Green Plains’ primary downstream logistics provider and generate a substantial portion of our revenues under fee-based commercial agreements with Green Plains Trade for receiving, storing, transferring and transporting ethanol and other fuels, which are supported by minimum volume or take-or-pay capacity commitments.

Recent Developments

Impact of COVID-19 and Decline in Oil Demand

We are closely monitoring the impact of COVID-19 on all aspects of our business, including how it will impact our employees, customers, vendors, and business partners. Although we did not incur significant disruptions during the three months ended March 31, 2020 from COVID-19, we are unable to predict the impact that COVID-19 will have on our future financial position and operating results, or that of our parent from which we obtain a significant portion of our revenues, due to numerous uncertainties.

The COVID-19 pandemic and related economic repercussions have created significant volatility, uncertainty, and turmoil in the energy industry. In early March, the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries and their allies (collectively, OPEC+) failed to reach an agreement on production levels for crude oil. This was quickly followed by a

Table of Contents

widespread slowdown in the U.S. and global economy in an effort to slow the COVID-19 pandemic. While OPEC+ agreed in April to cut production, downward pressure on prices has continued and could continue for the foreseeable future. A combination of these events has significantly deteriorated both prices and demand for various energy commodities and motor fuels, including ethanol, which could negatively impact our business and that of our parent. The situation surrounding COVID-19 continues to evolve rapidly and the ultimate duration and impact of the outbreak as well as the continued decline in oil demand remains highly uncertain and subject to change.

While we have instituted work from home arrangements for certain staff members, there has been no adverse effect on our ability to maintain operations, including our financial reporting systems, our internal controls over financial reporting or our disclosure controls and procedures. In addition, to date we have not incurred any material COVID-19 related contingencies.

For further information regarding the impact of COVID-19 and the decline in oil demand on the partnership, please see Part II, Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” in this report, which is incorporated herein by reference.

Results of Operations

During the first quarter of ~~2019,~~2020, our parent continued to adjust ethanol production in response to the weaker margin environment. In addition, overall performance at our parent’s ethanol plants was negatively impacted by flooding during the quarter, with the largest impact on the ability to transport products. Our parent’s average utilization rate was approximately ~~56.0~~%85.9% of capacity, resulting in ~~ethanol~~ethanol production of ~~155.0~~240.5 mmg, compared with the contracted minimum volume commitment of 235.7 mmg per quarter. As a result, ~~we charged~~ Green Plains Trade received a ~~deficiency payment in~~credit of $0.3 million, which was applied to the ~~amount of~~ $4.0 million volume deficiency credit related to ~~the minimum volume commitment for~~ the three months ended March 31, 2019. The remaining balance of this credit of $3.7 million expired as of March 31, 2020. The cumulative minimum volume deficiency credits available to Green Plains Trade as of March 31, 2020 totaled $0.5 million, which will expire if unused by June 30, 2020. These credits have been previously recognized as revenue, and as such, future volumes throughput by Green Plains Trade in excess of the minimum volume commitment, up to the amount of these credits, will not be recognized in revenue in future periods.

Our parent’s operating strategy is to reduce operating expenses, energy usage, and water consumption while running at higher utilization rates in order to achieve improved margins. However, in the current environment, given the significant drop in driving and gasoline demand, our parent will exercise operational discretion, potentially resulting in reductions in production across the platform, in order to maximize cash liquidity. As such, it is possible that future production could be below the quarterly minimum volume commitments, depending on various factors that drive each bio refineries variable contribution margin, including future driving and gasoline demand for the industry.

~~Table of Contents~~

Adjusted EBITDA and Distributable Cash Flow

Adjusted EBITDA is defined as earnings before interest expense, income tax expense, depreciation and amortization excluding the amortization of right-of-use assets, ~~and debt issuance costs,~~ plus adjustments for transaction costs related to acquisitions or financing transactions, ~~minimum volume commitment deficiency payments,~~ unit-based compensation expense, net gains or losses on asset sales, and our proportional share of EBITDA adjustments of our equity method investee.

Distributable cash flow is defined as adjusted EBITDA less interest paid or payable, income taxes paid or payable, maintenance capital expenditures, which are defined under our partnership agreement as cash expenditures (including expenditures for the construction or development of new capital assets or the replacement, improvement or expansion of existing capital assets) made to maintain our operating capacity or operating income, and our proportional share of distributable cash flow adjustments of our equity method investee.

Adjusted EBITDA and distributable cash flow are supplemental financial measures that we use to assess our financial performance. We believe their presentation provides useful information to investors in assessing our financial condition and results of operations. However, these presentations are not made in accordance with GAAP. The GAAP measure most directly comparable to adjusted EBITDA and distributable cash flow is net income. Since adjusted EBITDA and distributable cash flow may be defined differently by other companies in our industry, our definitions of adjusted EBITDA and distributable cash flow may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies, diminishing their utility. Adjusted EBITDA and distributable cash flow should not be considered in isolation or as alternatives to net income or any other measure of financial performance presented in accordance with GAAP to analyze our financial performance and operating results.

Table of Contents

The following table presents reconciliations of net income to adjusted EBITDA and to distributable cash flow, for the three months ended March 31, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018~~2019 (unaudited, dollars in thousands):


	Three Months Ended March 31,				Three Months Ended ‎March 31,
	2019		2018		2020		2019
Reconciliations to Non-GAAP Financial Measures:
Net income	$	10,248	$	13,372	$	10,369	$	10,248
Interest expense		2,055		1,571		1,864		2,055
Income tax expense		52		32		31		52
Depreciation and amortization		985		1,181		961		985
MVC adjustments (1)		-		747
Transaction costs		-		135
Unit-based compensation expense		79		60		79		79
Proportional share of EBITDA adjustments of equity method investee (2)		66		-
Proportional share of EBITDA adjustments of equity method investee ⁽¹⁾						50		66
Adjusted EBITDA		13,485		17,098		13,354		13,485
Interest paid or payable		(2,055)		(1,571)		(1,864)		(2,055)
Income taxes paid or payable		(53)		(32)		(31)		(53)
Maintenance capital expenditures		-		(15)		(22)		-
Distributable cash flow	$	11,377	$	15,480	$	11,437	$	11,377

Distributions declared (3)	$	11,269	$	15,493
Distributions declared⁽²⁾					$	2,836	$	11,269

Coverage ratio		1.01x		1.00x		4.03x		1.01x

(1) ~~Adjustments related to the storage and throughput quarterly minimum volume commitments.~~

~~(2)~~ Represents our proportional share of depreciation and amortization ~~interest expense, and income tax expense~~ of our equity method investee.

~~(3)~~(2) Distributions declared for the applicable period and paid in the subsequent quarter.

~~Table of Contents~~

Selected Financial Information and Operating Data

The following discussion reflects the results of the partnership for the three months ended March 31, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018.~~2019.

Selected financial information for the three months ended March 31, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018,~~2019, is as follows (unaudited, in thousands):


	Three Months Ended March 31,						Three Months Ended ‎March 31,
	2019		2018		% Var.		2020		2019		% Var.
Revenues
Storage and throughput services	$	11,785	$	14,642	(19.5)	%	$	11,785	$	11,785	-	%
Railcar transportation services		5,619		7,469	(24.8)			5,124		5,619	(8.8)
Terminal services		2,788		2,691	3.6			2,194		2,788	(21.3)
Trucking and other		895		1,083	(17.4)			1,168		895	30.5
Total revenues		21,087		25,885	(18.5)			20,271		21,087	(3.9)
Operating expenses
Operations and maintenance (excluding depreciation and amortization reflected below)		6,865		8,410	(18.4)			6,160		6,865	(10.3)
General and administrative		1,117		1,401	(20.3)			1,044		1,117	(6.5)
Depreciation and amortization		985		1,181	(16.6)			961		985	(2.4)
Total operating expenses		8,967		10,992	(18.4)			8,165		8,967	(8.9)
Operating income	$	12,120	$	14,893	(18.6)	%	$	12,106	$	12,120	(0.1)	%

Table of Contents

Selected operating data for the three months ended March 31, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018,~~2019, is as follows (unaudited):



	Three Months Ended March 31,				Three Months Ended ‎March 31,
	2019	2018	% Var.		2020	2019	% Var.
Product volumes (mmg)
Storage and throughput services	155.7	298.3	(47.8)	%	241.6	155.7	55.2	%

Terminal services:
Affiliate	24.8	29.6	(16.2)		32.5	24.8	31.0
Non-affiliate	25.6	32.1	(20.2)		26.5	25.6	3.5
	50.4	61.7	(18.3)		59.0	50.4	17.1

Railcar capacity billed (daily avg.)	83.4	99.2	(15.9)		78.8	83.4	(5.5)

Three Months Ended March 31, ~~2019,~~2020, Compared with the Three Months Ended March 31, ~~2018~~2019

Consolidated revenues decreased ~~$4.8~~$0.8 million for the three months ended March 31, ~~2019,~~2020, compared with the same period for ~~2018. Storage and throughput~~2019. Terminal services revenue decreased ~~$2.9~~$0.6 million ~~primarily due to a decrease in throughput volumes~~ as a result of ~~our parent’s sale of the Bluffton, Indiana, Lakota, Iowa, and Riga, Michigan ethanol plants~~a $0.9 million decrease in ~~the fourth quarter of 2018, and lower utilization rates across the remaining platform.~~MVC charges, partially offset by a $0.3 million increase associated with higher throughput volumes. Revenues generated from rail transportation services decreased $1.8 million primarily due to the reduction in volumetric capacity provided as a result of the assignment of railcar operating leases to Valero in the fourth quarter of 2018. Trucking and other revenue decreased $0.2$0.5 million primarily due to a reduction in volumetric capacity provided as well as lower sublease revenue. These decreases were partially offset by an increase of $0.3 million in trucking and other revenue due to an increase in volumes transported for Green Plains Trade. ~~Terminal services revenue remained relatively consistent as a result of non-affiliate minimum volume commitments.~~

Operations and maintenance expenses decreased ~~$1.5~~$0.7 million for the three months ended March 31, ~~2019,~~2020, compared with the same period for ~~2018,~~2019, primarily due to lower railcar lease ~~expense as a result of the assignment of railcar leases to Valero in the fourth quarter of 2018, as well as lower unloading fees on less volume at our terminals.~~expense.

General and administrative expenses decreased ~~$0.3~~$0.1 million for the three months ended March 31, ~~2019,~~2020, compared with the same period for ~~2018,~~2019, primarily due to a reduction in ~~accounting and transaction fees.~~expenses allocated by our parent under the secondment agreement.

~~Table of Contents~~

Distributable cash flow ~~decreased $4.1 million~~ for the three months ended March 31, ~~2019, compared with~~2020 was comparable to the same period for 2018 primarily due to lower net income as a result of the sale of our parent’s Bluffton, Indiana, Lakota, Iowa, and Riga, Michigan ethanol plants in the fourth quarter of 2018. Interest expense increased by $0.5 million primarily due to higher average interest rates.2019.

Industry Factors Affecting our Results of Operations

U.S. Ethanol Supply and Demand

According to the EIA, domestic ethanol production averaged ~~1.01~~1.03 million barrels per day during the first quarter of ~~2019,~~2020, which was ~~3% lower~~2% higher than the ~~1.04~~1.01 million barrels for the first quarter of last year. Refiner and blender input volume ~~increased 1%~~decreased 3% to ~~886~~858 thousand barrels per day for the first quarter of ~~2019,~~2020, compared with ~~875~~886 thousand barrels per day for the same quarter last year. Gasoline demand for the first quarter of ~~2019~~2020 decreased 62348 thousand barrels per day, or 1%4% compared to the same quarter last year. U.S. domestic ethanol ending stocks increased by approximately ~~1.6~~1.7 million barrels, or 7%, to ~~24.0~~25.7 million barrels for the first quarter of ~~2019.~~2020. At the end of May 2019, the EPA finalized regulatory changes to apply the 1 pound per square inch Reid Vapor Pressure (RVP) waiver that currently applies to E10 during the summer months so that it applies to E15 as well. This removes a significant barrier to wider sales of E15 in the summer months, thus expanding the market for ethanol in transportation fuel. As of ~~May 1, 2019,~~March 17, 2020, there were approximately ~~1,780~~2,140 retail stations selling E15 in 3130 states, up from ~~1,700~~2,080 at the beginning of the year, according to Growth Energy.

In March 2020, members of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries and their allies (collectively, OPEC+) failed to reach an agreement on production levels which led to a substantial decrease in oil prices and an increasingly volatile market. While OPEC+ agreed in April to cut production, downward pressure on prices has continued and could continue for the foreseeable future. In addition, with the widespread shutdowns and “shelter in place” orders across the United States also beginning in March 2020 related to the COVID-19 pandemic, driving miles and fuel consumption have been reduced significantly. This has had a similar impact on ethanol demand resulting in the shutdown of approximately 50% of total industry production capacity.

Table of Contents

Global Ethanol Supply and Demand

According to the USDA Foreign Agriculture Service, domestic ethanol exports ~~for 2018~~through February 29, 2020 were approximately ~~1.70~~0.35 bgy, up ~~25%~~43% from ~~1.37~~0.24 bgy for ~~2017.~~the same period of 2019. Brazil remained the largest export destination for U.S. ethanol, which accounted for ~~30%~~33% of domestic ethanol export volume despite the 20% tariff on U.S. ethanol imports in excess of 150 million liters, or 39.6 million gallons per quarter, imposed in September 2017 by Brazil’s Chamber of Foreign Trade, or CAMEX. ~~Canada,~~In a resolution published August 31, 2019, Brazil raised the annual import quota to 750 million duty free liters distributed on a quarterly basis as follows: September to November 100 million liters, December to February 100 million liters, March to May 275 million liters and June to August 275 million liters. In addition, India, ~~and~~Canada, South Korea, and the Netherlands accounted for ~~20%~~18%, 9%16%, 7%, and 5%7%, respectively, of U.S. ethanol exports.

On April 1, 2018, China announced it would add an additional 15% tariff to the existing 30% tariff it had earlier imposed on ethanol imports from the United States and Brazil. China later raised the tariff further to 70% as the trade war escalated. In ~~April 2019,~~January 2020, China and the ~~Trump administration announced a potential meeting with Chinese President Xi in May~~United States agreed to certain trade agreements, the impact of ~~2019~~which on ethanol are yet to ~~complete the trade agreement between the U.S. and China.~~be determined.

The cost to produce the equivalent amount of starch found in sugar from $3.50-per-bushel corn is 7 cents per pound. The average price of sugar ~~remained at~~was approximately 1313.6 cents per pound during the first quarter of ~~2019.~~2020. We currently estimate that net ethanol exports will ~~reach between 1.6~~range from 1.1 billion ~~gallons and 1.7~~to 1.5 billion gallons in ~~2019~~2020, excluding any potential exports to China, based on historical demand from a variety of countries and certain countries who seek to improve their air quality and eliminate MTBE from their own fuel supplies.

Legislation and Regulation

We are sensitive to government programs and policies that affect the supply and demand for ethanol and other fuels, which in turn may impact the volume of ethanol and other fuels we handle. ~~This Congress may consider legislation that would impact the RFS.~~ Various bills have been discussed in the House and Senate which would eliminate the RFS II entirely, eliminate the corn based ethanol portion of the mandate, or make it more difficult to sell fuel blends with higher levels of ethanol. ~~However, we~~We believe it is unlikely that any of these bills will ~~be passed~~become law in the current Congress. In addition, the manner in which the EPA administers the RFS II can have a ~~divided Congress.~~significant impact on the actual amount of ethanol blended into the domestic fuel supply.

Federal mandates and state-level clean fuel programs supporting the use of renewable fuels are a significant driver of ethanol demand in the U.S. Ethanol policies are influenced by ~~environmental~~ concerns for the environment, diversifying our fuel supply, and ~~an interest in~~ reducing the country’s dependence on foreign oil. Consumer acceptance of flex-fuel vehicles and higher ethanol blends of ethanol in non-flex-fuel vehicles may be necessary before ethanol can achieve ~~significant~~further growth in U.S. market share. ~~CAFE, which was~~

Congress first enacted ~~by Congress~~CAFE in 1975 to reduce energy consumption by increasing the fuel economy of cars and light ~~trucks, provides~~trucks. Flexible-fuel vehicles (FFVs), which are designed to run on a ~~54% efficiency bonus~~mixture of fuels, including higher blends of ethanol such as E85, receive preferential treatment in the form of CAFE credits. There are approximately 21 million FFVs on the road in the U.S. today, 16 million of which are light duty trucks. FFV credits have been decreasing since 2014 and will be completely phased out in 2020. Absent CAFE preferences, auto manufacturers may not be willing to build flexible-fuel vehicles, ~~running on E85.~~ which has the potential to slow the growth of E85 markets.

Another important factor is a waiver in the Clean Air Act, known as the One-Pound Waiver, which allows E10 to be sold year-round, even though it exceeds the Reid Vapor Pressure limitation of nine pounds per square inch. ~~In proposed rule-making,~~At the end of May 2019, the EPA ~~has proposed to extend~~finalized a rule which extended the One-Pound Waiver to E15. This allows E15 ~~so its sale can expand beyond flex-fuel~~to be sold year round to all vehicles model year 2001 and newer. This rule is being challenged in an action filed in Federal District Court for the DC Circuit. However, the One-Pound Waiver is in effect, and for the first time ever, E15 was legally sold to all vehicles model year 2001 and newer during the summer driving season of June 1 to September 15, ~~summer~~2019.

The RFS II has been a driving ~~season.~~

~~The EPA accepted comments on its proposed rule until April 29, 2019, and is working to finalize~~factor in the ~~rule consistent with~~growth of ethanol usage in the U.S. President’s stated goal of having a final rule out before the start of summer driving season on June 1, 2019. Any final rule from the agency is susceptible to legal challenges. The proposed rule also contains certain RIN reform changes that could reduce RIN values and subsequently reduce incentives for higher ethanol blends, including E15.

~~Table of Contents~~

United States. When the RFS II was ~~passed~~established in ~~2007 and rulemaking finalized in October~~ 2010, the required volume of ~~conventional renewable fuel~~“conventional” corn-based ethanol to be blended with gasoline was to increase each year until it reached 15.0 billion gallons in ~~2015. In November 2018,~~2015, which left the EPA to address existing limitations in both supply (ethanol production) and demand (usage of ethanol blends in older vehicles). On December 19, 2019, the EPA announced ~~it would maintain~~ the ~~15.0 billion gallon mandate~~final 2020 RVO for conventional ethanol, ~~in 2019.~~which met the 15.0-billion-gallon congressional target.

The EPA has the authority to waive the mandates, in whole or in part, if there is inadequate domestic renewable fuel supply or the requirement severely harms the economy or environment. According to the RFS II, if mandatory renewable fuel volumes are reduced by at least 20% for two consecutive years, the EPA is required to modify, or reset, statutory volumes

Table of Contents

through ~~2022.~~2022 – the year through which the statutorily prescribed volumes run. While conventional ethanol maintained 15 billion gallons, 2019 iswas the second consecutive year that the total proposed ~~RVOs are~~RVO was more than 20% below statutory volumes levels. Thus, the EPA ~~Administrator has directed his staff~~was expected to initiate a reset rulemaking, ~~wherein the EPA will~~and modify statutory volumes through 2022, and do so based on the same factors ~~used~~they are to ~~set~~use in setting the RVOs post-2022. These factors include environmental impact, domestic energy security, expected production, infrastructure impact, consumer costs, job creation, price of agricultural commodities, food prices, and rural economic development. However, on December 19, 2019, the EPA announced it would not be moving forward with a reset rulemaking in 2020.

The EPA assigns individual refiners, blenders, and importers the volume of renewable fuels they are obligated to use based on their percentage of total domestic transportation fuel sales. Obligated parties use RINs to show compliance with ~~RFS-mandated~~the RFS II mandated volumes. Ethanol producers assign RINs ~~are attached~~ to renewable fuels ~~by ethanol producers, like our parent,~~ and the RINs are detached when the renewable fuel is blended with transportation fuel ~~or traded~~domestically. Market participants can trade the detached RINs in the open market. The market price of detached RINs affects the price of ethanol in certain markets and influences the purchasing decisions by obligated parties.

On April 15, 2020, five Governors sent a letter to the EPA requesting a general waiver from the RFS due to the drop in demand caused by COVID-19 travel restrictions. They contend that the compliance costs – i.e. cost to purchase RINs – is onerous and could put some refineries out of business. The EPA has 90 days to respond, and as of this filing had indicated only that they are “watching the situation closely, and reviewing the governors’ letter.”

Under the RFS II, a small refinery is defined as one that processes fewer than 75,000 barrels of petroleum per day. Small refineries can inpetition the EPA for a SRE which, if approved, waives their portion of the annual RVO requirements. The EPA, through consultation with the Department of Energy ~~waive~~and the ~~obligation~~Department of Agriculture, can grant them a full or partial waiver, or deny it outright within 90 days of submittal. The EPA granted significantly more of these waivers for ~~individual refineries that are suffering “disproportionate economic hardship” due to compliance with~~2016, 2017 and 2018 than they had in the ~~RFS. To qualify, the refineries must be under total throughput of 75,000 barrels per day and state their case for an exemption in an application to the EPA each year.~~

~~The Trump administration waived the obligation for 19 of 20 applicants for compliance year 2016,~~past, totaling 790 million gallons ~~and 35~~ of 37waived requirements for the 2016 compliance year, ~~2017, totaling~~ 1.82 billion ~~gallons. This~~gallons for 2017 and 1.43 billion gallons for 2018. In doing so, the EPA effectively ~~reduces~~reduced the ~~annual RVO~~RFS II mandated volumes for those compliance years by that amount, since the waived gallons are not reallocated to other obligated parties at this time. The resulting surplus of RINs in the market has brought values down significantly to under $0.20. Since higherthose amounts respectively, and as a result, RIN values help to make higher blends of ethanol more cost effective, lower RIN values could negatively impact retailer and consumer adoption of E15 and higher blends. There are 39 waiver applications pending for compliance year 2018.have declined significantly.

Biofuels groups have filed a lawsuit in the ~~U.S. Federal District~~ Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, challenging the 2019 RVO rule over the EPA’s failure to address small refinery exemptions in the rulemaking. This iswas the first RFS II rulemaking since the expanded use of the exemptions came to ~~light,~~light; however, the EPA ~~has refused~~had declined to cap the number of waivers it grants, orand until late 2019, had declined to alter how it accounts for the retroactive waivers in its ~~percentage standard~~annual volume calculations. The EPA has a statutory mandate to ensure the volume requirements are met, which are achieved by setting the percentage standards for obligated parties. The ~~current~~EPA’s recent approach ~~accomplishes~~accomplished the opposite. Even if all the obligated parties ~~comply~~complied with their respective percentage obligations for 2019, the nation’s overall supply of renewable fuel ~~will~~would not meet the total volume requirements set by the EPA. ~~We believe this~~This undermines Congressional intent ~~of demand pressure creation and an increased~~to increase the consumption of renewable ~~fuels.~~fuels in the domestic transportation fuel supply. Biofuels groups ~~argue~~have argued the EPA must therefore adjust its percentage standard calculations to make up for past retroactive waivers and adjust the standards to account for any waivers it reasonably expects to grant in the future.

In ~~another case on July 28, 2017,~~a supplemental rulemaking to the 2020 RVO rule, the EPA changed their approach, and for the first time accounted for the gallons that they anticipate they will be waiving from the blending requirements due to small refinery exemptions. To accomplish this, they are adding in the trailing three year average of gallons the Department of Energy recommended be waived, in effect raising the blending volumes across the board in anticipation of waiving the obligations in whole or in part for certain refineries that qualify for the exemptions. Though the EPA has often disregarded the recommendations of the Department of Energy in years past, they stated in the rule their intent to adhere to these recommendations going forward, including granting partial waivers rather than an all or nothing approach. The EPA will be adjudicating the 2020 compliance year small refinery exemption applications in early 2021, but have indicated they will adhere to Department of Energy recommendations for the 2019 compliance year applications as well, which should be adjudicated in 2020. There were 26 applications pending as of this filing.

On January 24, 2020, the U.S. ~~Federal District~~ Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit ruled on RFA et. al. vs. EPA in favor of biofuels interests, overturning EPA’s granting of refinery exemptions to three refineries on two separate grounds. The Court agreed that, under the Clean Air Act, refineries are eligible for SREs for a given RVO year only if such exemptions are extensions of exemptions granted in previous RVO years. In this case, the three refineries at issue did not qualify for SREs in the year prior to the year that EPA granted them. They were thus ineligible for additional SRE relief because there were no immediately prior SREs to extend. In addition, the Court agreed that the disproportionate economic hardship prong of SRE eligibility should be determined solely by reference to whether compliance with the RFS II creates such hardship, not whether compliance plus other issues create disproportionate economic hardship. The Court thus vacated EPA's grant of SREs for

Table of Contents

certain years and remanded the grants back to EPA. The refiners appealed for a rehearing which was denied. It is possible the decision will be appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court. If the decision against the EPA is upheld by the Supreme Court, it is uncertain how the EPA will propose to remedy the situation.

The White House directed the USDA and EPA to move forward with rulemaking to expand access to higher blends of biofuels. This includes funding for infrastructure, labeling changes and allowing E15 to be sold through E10 infrastructure.

In 2017, the D.C. Circuit ruled in favor of ~~the Americans for Clean Energy and its petitioners~~biofuel groups against the EPA related to its decision to lower the 2016 volume requirements. The Court concluded the EPA erred in how it interpreted the “inadequate domestic supply” waiver provision of RFS II, which authorizes the EPA to consider supply-side factors affecting the volume of renewable fuel available to refiners, blenders and importers to meet statutory volume requirements. The waiver provision does not allow the EPA to consider the volume of renewable fuel available to consumers or the demand-side constraints that affect the consumption of renewable fuelrequirements by ~~consumers.~~500 million gallons. As a result, the Court ~~vacated the EPA’s decision~~remanded to ~~reduce the total renewable fuel volume requirements for 2016 through its waiver authority, which~~ the EPA ~~is expected~~ to address. We believe this decision to confine the EPA’s waiver analysis to supply considerations benefits the industry overall and expect the primary impact will be on the RINs market. The EPA has not yet accountedmake up for the 500 million ~~gallons that the Court~~gallons. Despite this, in the ~~Americans~~proposed 2020 RVO rulemaking released in July 2019, the EPA stated it does not intend to make up the 500 million gallons as the court directed, citing potential burden on obligated parties. The EPA has indicated that it plans to address this court ordered remand in 2020.

To respond to the COVID-19 health crisis and attempt to offset the subsequent economic damage, Congress passed the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act (CARES Act) in late March 2020. It created and funded multiple programs that have impacted or could impact our industry. The USDA was given additional resources for ~~Clean Energy case directed, though~~the Commodity Credit Corporation (CCC) and they ~~have indicated they will~~are using those funds to provide direct payments to farmers, including corn farmers from whom our parent buys most of its feedstock for ethanol production. Similar to the trade aid payments made by the USDA over the past two years, this cash injection for farmers could cause them to delay marketing decisions and increase the price our parent has to pay to purchase the corn. The USDA did not include itany CCC funds for ethanol plants as of this filing.

The CARES Act also provided for the Small Business Administration (SBA) to assist companies with fewer than 500 employees, and for some North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) codes, 1,000 employees, and keep them from laying off workers. The Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) was created and quickly paid out all of the funds appropriated, including some to farmers and to ethanol plants with fewer than 1,000 employees. This could create a competitive imbalance in the ~~reset rulemaking~~marketplace, and for farmers, like the CCC funds, incentivize them to delay marketing corn. The PPP had its authorization increased by $321 billion in April.

The CARES Act also directed the Treasury Department to create programs to support medium-sized businesses, with fewer than 1,000 employees in the case of our parent, however neither we nor our parent qualified for these PPP funds from the SBA. The “Main Street” programs provide low interest loans to qualifying companies and we are awaiting the Treasury Department final guidelines to determine if we or our parent qualify.

Ethanol is the ~~2020 RVOs.~~primary ingredient in hand sanitizer. The CARES Act also provided a tax exclusion on the shipment of un-denatured ethanol for use in manufacturing hand sanitizer. The FDA has provided expanded guidance to allow for more denaturants to be used in ethanol intended for hand sanitizer production, and has expanded the grades of ethanol allowed for the duration of the public health crisis.

~~Table of Contents~~

Government actions abroad can significantly impact the demand for U.S. ethanol. In September 2017, China’s National Development and Reform Commission, the National Energy ~~Board~~Agency and 15 other state departments issued a joint plan to expand the use and production of biofuels containing up to 10% ethanol by 2020. China, the number three importer of U.S. ethanol in 2016, imported negligible volumes during ~~fiscal year~~ 2018 and 2019 due to a 30% tariff on U.S. ethanol, which increased to 70% in early ~~2018, imposed on the U.S.~~2018. There is no assurance that China’s joint plan to expand blending to 10% will be carried to fruition, nor that it will lead to increased imports of U.S. ~~ethanol. Our exports also face tariffs, rate quotas, countervailing duties,~~ethanol in the near term. Ethanol is included as an agricultural commodity under the “Phase I” agreement with China, wherein they are to purchase upwards of $40 billion in agricultural commodities from the U.S. in both 2020 and ~~other hurdles in Brazil, the European Union, India, Peru, and elsewhere, which limits our ability to compete in some markets.~~2021.

In Brazil, the Secretary of Foreign Trade issued an official written resolution, imposing a 20% tariff on U.S. ethanol imports in excess of 150 million liters, or 39.6 million gallons per quarter in September 2017. The initial ruling iswas valid for two ~~years, and is set to expire~~years; however, it was extended at the end of August ~~2019.~~ 2019 for an additional year. On an annual basis, Brazil will now allow into the country 750 million duty free liters distributed on a quarterly basis as follows: September to November 100 million liters, December to February 100 million liters, March to May 275 million liters and June to August 275 million liters.

Our parent’s exports also face tariffs, rate quotas, countervailing duties, and other hurdles in the European Union, India, Peru, and elsewhere, which limits the ability to compete in some markets.

Table of Contents

In June 2017, the Energy Regulatory Commission of Mexico (CRE) approved the use of 10% ethanol blends, which was challenged by ~~nine lawsuits. Four cases~~multiple lawsuits, of which several were dismissed. The ~~five~~ remaining four cases follow one of two tracks: 1) to determine the constitutionality of the CRE regulation, or 2) to determine the benefits, or lack thereof, of introducing E10 to Mexico. An injunction was granted in October 2017, preventing the blending and selling of E10, but was overturned by a higher court in June 2018 making it legal to blend and sell E10 by PEMEX throughout Mexico except for its three largest metropolitan areas. On January 15, 2020, the Mexican Supreme Court ruled that the expedited process for the CRE regulation was unconstitutional, and that after a 180 day period the maximum ethanol blend allowed in the country would revert to 5.8%. There is an effort underway to go through the full regulatory process to allow for 10% blends countrywide, including in the three major metropolitan areas. U.S. ethanol exports to Mexico totaled ~~29.4~~31.2 mmg in ~~2018.~~2019.

On January 29, 2020, the President signed into law the updated North American Free Trade Agreement, known as the United States Mexico Canada Agreement or USMCA. The pact maintains the duty free access of U.S. agricultural commodities, including ethanol, into Canada and Mexico. The USMCA will take effect on July 1, 2020.

Colombia has banned imports of fuel ethanol for two months, with the possibility of extending the ban one additional month. The Columbian President ordered this emergency decree citing COVID-19 as the rationale. This action is WTO compliant under Article 20 of the GATT. In 2019, the U.S. shipped Columbia 80.2 million gallons of ethanol.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our principal sources of liquidity include cash generated from operating activities and borrowings under our revolving credit facility. We consider opportunities to repay, redeem, repurchase or refinance our debt, depending on market conditions, as part of our normal course of doing business. Our ability to meet our debt service obligations and other capital requirements depends on our future operating performance, which is subject to general economic, financial, business, competitive, legislative, regulatory and other conditions, many of which are beyond our control. We plan to fund future expansion capital expenditures primarily from external sources, including borrowings under our revolving credit facility and issuances of debt and equity securities. ~~We expect these~~In the event that existing liquidity sources ~~will~~are no longer sufficient for our capital requirements, we would explore additional external financing sources. However, there can be ~~adequate for both our short-term and long-term liquidity needs.~~ no assurance that such sources would be available on terms acceptable to us, if at all.

At March 31, ~~2019,~~2020, we had $0.3 million of cash and cash equivalents and ~~$65.0~~$69.8 million available under our revolving credit facility.

Net cash provided by operating activities was $13.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2020, compared with $10.0 million for the three months ended March 31, ~~2019, compared with $14.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2018.~~2019. The ~~decrease~~increase in cash flows from operating activities resulted primarily from ~~a decrease~~an increase in net income of $3.1 million as a result of the sale of the storage assets and the assignment of railcar operating leases associated with the Bluffton, Indiana, Lakota, Iowa, and Riga, Michigan ethanol plants in the fourth quarter of 2018. There was noworking capital. Net cash used in investing activities for the three months ended March 31, ~~2019, compared~~2020 was comparable to ~~$1.2~~the same period for 2019. Net cash used in financing activities was $13.2 million ~~utilized~~ for ~~the expansion of our truck and tanker fleet during~~ the three months ended March 31, ~~2018. Net cash used in financing activities was~~2020, compared with $10.3 million for the three months ended March 31, ~~2019, compared with $13.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2018.~~2019. The ~~decrease~~increase in cash used in financing activities was due to a ~~$4.0 million reduction in cash distributions as a result of the retirement of shares in the fourth quarter of 2018, partially offset by a $1.1~~$2.9 million decrease in net borrowings.

We ~~did not incur any~~incurred capital expenditures of $22 thousand for the three months ended March 31, ~~2019, and we~~2020. We do not anticipate significant capital spending for the remainder of ~~2019.~~2020.

We did not make any equity method investee contributions related to the NLR joint venture for the three months ended March 31, ~~2019,~~2020, and we do not anticipate making significant equity contributions to NLR for the remainder of ~~2019.~~2020.

Revolving Credit Facility

Green Plains Operating Company has a $200.0 million secured revolving credit facility, which matures on July 1, 2020, to fund working capital, acquisitions, distributions, capital expenditures and other general partnership purposes. ~~The~~We intend to renew the revolving credit facility ~~can be increased by up to $20.0 million without~~or replace it with another line of credit on or before the ~~consent of the lenders.~~expiration date. At March 31, ~~2019,~~2020, the outstanding principal balance was ~~$135.0~~$130.2 million with an average interest rate of ~~5.51%~~3.95%.

Table of Contents

The revolving credit facility, which is provided by a syndicate of financial institutions, will mature on July 1, 2020 unless extended by agreement of the lenders or replaced by another funding source. We are currently working with the existing lender group to extend the credit facility. While we have not yet formalized the credit facility or secured additional funding necessary to repay the loan, we believe it is probable that we will source appropriate funding given our consistent and stable fee-based cash flows, ongoing profitability, low debt leverage and history of obtaining financing on reasonable commercial terms. In the unlikely scenario that we are unable to refinance our debt with the lenders, we will consider other financing sources, including but not limited to, the restructuring or issuance of new debt with a different lending group, the issuance of additional partnership units, or other measures.

We use LIBOR as a reference rate for our revolving credit facility. LIBOR is set to be phased out at the end of 2021. ~~At this~~It is unclear if LIBOR will cease to exist at that time or if new methods of calculating LIBOR will be established such that it ~~is not possible~~continues to ~~predict the effect of this change or the alternative reference rate to be used.~~exist after 2021. We will need to renegotiate our credit facility to determine the interest rate to replace LIBOR with the new standard that is established. The potential effect of any such event on interest expense cannot yet be determined.

~~Table of Contents~~

For more information related to our debt, see Note 34 – Debt to the consolidated financial statements in this report.

Distributions to Unitholders

On April ~~18, 2019,~~16, 2020, the board of directors of the general partner ~~declared a~~reduced the quarterly cash distribution ~~of $0.475~~by 75% to $0.12 per unit, or approximately ~~$11.3~~$2.8 million, for the quarter ended March 31, ~~2019.~~2020. This reduction will free up approximately $33.8 million annually, which we intend to use to amortize debt. The distribution is payable on May ~~10, 2019,~~8, 2020, to unitholders of record at the close of business on May ~~3, 2019.~~1, 2020.

Contractual Obligations

Our contractual obligations as of March 31, ~~2019,~~2020, were as follows (in thousands):



	Payments Due By Period										Payments Due By Period
Contractual Obligations	Total		Less Than 1 Year		1-3 Years		3-5 Years		More Than 5 Years		Total		Less Than ‎1 Year		1-3 Years		3-5 Years		More Than ‎5 Years
Long-term debt obligations (1)	$	143,100	$	-	$	136,505	$	1,366	$	5,229	$	130,200	$	130,200	$	-	$	-	$	-
Interest and fees on debt obligations (2)		10,390		7,870		2,124		148		248		1,376		1,376		-		-		-
Operating leases (3)		41,574		13,929		17,422		5,513		4,710		42,838		14,213		17,317		7,480		3,828
Service agreements (4)		964		651		313		-		-		794		637		157		-		-
Other (5)		4,525		642		1,061		1,739		1,083		4,719		905		1,782		949		1,083
Total contractual obligations	$	200,553	$	23,092	$	157,425	$	8,766	$	11,270	$	179,927	$	147,331	$	19,256	$	8,429	$	4,911

(1) Includes the current portion of long-term debt and excludes the effect of any debt discounts.

(2) Interest amounts are calculated over the terms of the loans using current interest rates, assuming scheduled principal and interest amounts are paid pursuant to the debt agreements. Includes administrative and/or commitment fees on debt obligations.

(3) Operating lease costs are primarily for property and railcar leases.

(4) Service agreements are primarily related to minimum commitments on railcar unloading contracts at our fuel terminals.

(5) Includes asset retirement obligations to return property to its original condition at the termination of lease agreements.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Key accounting policies, including those relating to ~~depreciation of property and equipment,~~revenue recognition, leases, asset retirement obligations, and impairment of long-lived assets and goodwill are impacted significantly by judgments, assumptions and estimates used to prepare our consolidated financial statements. Information about our critical accounting policies and estimates is included in our ~~2018~~2019 annual report.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements.

Table of Contents

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

Market risk is the risk of loss arising from adverse changes in market rates and prices. At this time, we conduct all of our business in U.S. dollars and are not exposed to foreign currency risk.

Interest Rate Risk

We are exposed to interest rate risk through our revolving credit facility, which bears interest at variable rates. At March 31, ~~2019,~~2020, we had ~~$135.0~~$130.2 million outstanding under our revolving credit facility. A 10% change in interest rates would affect our interest expense by approximately ~~$744~~$514 thousand per year, assuming no changes in the amount outstanding or other variables under our revolving credit facility.

Other details about our outstanding debt are discussed in the notes to the consolidated financial statements included in this report and in our 2019 annual report.

~~Table of Contents~~

Commodity Price Risk

We do not have any direct exposure to risks associated with fluctuating commodity prices because we do not own the ethanol and other fuels that are stored at our facilities or transported by our railcars and trucks.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures designed to ensure information that must be disclosed in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required financial disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives. Management is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.

Under the supervision and participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, management carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of March 31, ~~2019,~~2020, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act and concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of our financial reporting and the preparation of our consolidated financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. We implemented internal controls to ensure we properly assessed the impact of the new lease accounting standard on our financial statements to facilitate the adoption on January 1, 2019. There were no significant changes to our internal control over financial reporting due to the adoption of this standard.

Emerging Growth Company Status

As an emerging growth company, we are not required to provide an auditor’s attestation report on the effectiveness of our system of internal control over financial reporting, adopt new or revised financial accounting standards until they apply to private companies, comply with any new requirements adopted by the PCAOB to rotate audit firms or supplement the auditor’s report with additional information about the audit and financial statements of the issuer, or disclose the same level of information about executive compensation required of larger public companies.

We have elected to take advantage of these provisions except for the exemption that allows us to extend the transition period for compliance with new or revised financial accounting standards. This election is irrevocable.

We will no longer be an emerging growth company on the earliest of (i) the last day of the fiscal year ending December 31, 2020, (ii) the last day of the fiscal year in which we have more than $1.0 billion in annual revenues, (iii) the date on which the market value of our common units held by non-affiliates exceeds $700.0 million, or (iv) the date on which we have issued more than $1.0 billion of non-convertible debt over a three-year period.
‎

Table of Contents

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings.

We may be involved in litigation that arises during the ordinary course of business. We are not, however, involved in any material litigation at this time.

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

Investors should carefully consider the discussion of risks and the other information in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2018,~~2019, in Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” and the discussion of risks and other information in Part I, Item 2, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” under “Cautionary Information Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” of this report. Although we have attempted to discuss key factors, our investors need to be aware that other risks may prove to be important in the future. New risks may emerge at any time and we cannot predict such risks or estimate the extent to which they may affect our financial performance. ~~There have been no material changes to the~~The following risk factors supplement and/or update risk factors previously disclosed and should be considered in ~~our annual~~conjunction with the other information included in, or incorporated by reference in, this quarterly report on Form ~~10-K~~10-Q.

Our business may be adversely impacted by the recent COVID-19 outbreak in addition to a decrease in energy demand.

The recent outbreak of the coronavirus or COVID-19, which has been declared by the World Health Organization to be a pandemic, has spread across the globe and is impacting worldwide economic activity. COVID-19 poses a risk on all aspects of our business, including how it will impact our employees, customers, vendors, and business partners. We are unable to predict the impact that COVID-19 will have on our future financial position and operating results, or that of our parent from which we obtain a significant portion of our revenues, due to numerous uncertainties. These uncertainties include, but are not limited to:

the severity of the virus;

the duration of the outbreak;

federal, state or local governmental regulations or other actions which could include limitations on our operations;

the effect on customer demand resulting in a decline in the demand for our parent’s products;

impacts on our supply chain and potential limitations of supply of our parent’s feedstocks;

interruptions of our distribution systems and delays in the delivery of product;

the health of our workforce, and our ability to meet staffing needs which is vital to our operations; and

volatility in the credit and financial markets.

The COVID-19 pandemic and related economic repercussions have created significant volatility, uncertainty, and turmoil in the energy industry. In addition to COVID-19, in early March, the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries and their allies (collectively, OPEC+) failed to reach an agreement on production levels for crude oil. This was quickly followed by a widespread slowdown in the U.S. and global economy in an effort to slow the COVID-19 pandemic. While OPEC+ agreed in April to cut production, downward pressure on prices has continued and could continue for the ~~year ended December~~foreseeable future. A combination of these events has significantly deteriorated both prices and demand for various energy commodities and motor fuels, including ethanol, which could negatively impact our business and that of our parent. We are unable to predict the overall impact these events will have on our future financial position and operations, including those of our parent.

We are actively managing our response in collaboration with customers, government officials, team members and business partners and assessing potential impacts to our future financial position and operating results, as well as adverse developments in our business. It is not possible for us to predict whether there will be additional government-mandated shelter-in-place and similar government orders that could affect our business, how long the existing orders will remain in place, and how these measures will impact our operations.

Table of Contents

Our revolving credit facility includes restrictions that may limit our ability to finance future operations, meet our capital needs or expand our business. In addition, our revolving credit facility matures on July 1, 2020 and we may not be able to renew, extend or replace the expiring facility. If we fail to comply with covenants in our revolving credit facility or if the facility is terminated, we may be required to repay our indebtedness thereunder, which may have an adverse effect on our liquidity.

We are dependent upon the earnings and cash flow generated by our operations in order to meet our debt service obligations and to allow us to pay cash distributions to our unitholders. The operating and financial restrictions and covenants in our revolving credit facility or in any future financing agreements could restrict our ability to finance future operations or capital needs or to expand or pursue our business activities, which may, in turn, limit our ability to pay cash distributions to our unitholders. For example, our revolving credit facility restricts our ability to, among other things:

make certain cash distributions;

incur certain indebtedness;

create certain liens;

make certain investments;

merge or sell certain of our assets; and

expand the nature of our business.

Furthermore, our revolving credit facility contains covenants requiring us to maintain certain financial ratios.

The provisions of our revolving credit facility may affect our ability to obtain future financing and pursue attractive business opportunities and our flexibility in planning for, and reacting to, changes in business conditions. In addition, a failure to comply with the provisions of our revolving credit facility could result in an event of default that could enable our lenders, subject to the terms and conditions of our revolving credit facility, to declare the outstanding principal of that debt, together with accrued interest, to be immediately due and payable and/or to proceed against the collateral granted to them to secure such debt. If there is a default or event of default under our debt the payment of our debt is accelerated, defaults under our other debt instruments, if any, may be triggered, and our assets may be insufficient to repay such debt in full. Therefore, the holders of our units could experience a partial or total loss of their investment.

The revolving credit facility matures on July 1, 2020, and any outstanding balance is due in full on that date. As of March 31, ~~2018.~~2020, we had an outstanding principal balance of $130.2 million under the credit facility. The ability to renew the credit facility, refinance the debt or otherwise repay the outstanding debt prior to maturity is dependent upon capital/credit market conditions as well as our financial condition, operating results and cash flows, all of which are subject to prevailing economic and competitive conditions in addition to financial, business, legislative, governmental, political, regulatory and other factors beyond our control. Therefore, we can give no assurance that we will be able to renew the credit facility or refinance the debt on terms favorable to us, or at all, or that we will otherwise be able repay the credit facility obligations in full by the maturity date. In such event, we could face substantial liquidity problems, which could cause a materially adverse impact on our results of operations, cash flows and ability to make distributions to our unitholders.

Future demand for ethanol is uncertain and changes in federal mandates, public perception, consumer acceptance and overall consumer demand for transportation fuel could affect demand.

While many trade groups, academics and government agencies support ethanol as a fuel additive that promotes a cleaner environment, others claim ethanol production consumes considerably more energy, emits more greenhouse gases than other fuels and depletes water resources. While we do not agree, some studies suggest ethanol produced from corn is less efficient than ethanol produced from switch grass or wheat grain. Others claim corn-based ethanol negatively impacts consumers by causing the prices of meat and other food derived from corn-consuming livestock to increase. Ethanol critics also contend the industry redirects corn supplies from international food markets to domestic fuel markets, and contributes to land use change domestically and abroad.

There are limited markets for ethanol beyond the federal mandates. We believe further consumer acceptance of E15 and E85 fuels may be necessary before ethanol can achieve significant market share growth. Discretionary and E85 blending are important secondary markets. Discretionary blending is often determined by the price of ethanol relative to gasoline, and availability to consumers. When discretionary blending is financially unattractive, the demand for ethanol may be reduced.

Table of Contents

Demand for ethanol is also affected by overall demand for transportation fuel, which is affected by cost, number of miles traveled and vehicle fuel economy. Miles traveled typically increases during the spring and summer months related to vacation travel, followed closely behind the fall season due to holiday travel. Global events, such as COVID-19, have greatly decreased miles traveled and in turn, the demand for ethanol. Consumer demand for gasoline may be impacted by emerging transportation trends, such as electric vehicles or ride sharing. Additionally, factors such as over-supply of ethanol, which has been the case for some time, could continue to negatively impact our parent’s business. Reduced demand for ethanol may depress the value of our parent’s products, erode its margins, and reduce our parent’s, and consequently our, ability to generate revenue or operate profitably.

Our insurance policies do not cover all losses, costs or liabilities that we may experience, and insurance companies that currently insure companies in the energy industry may cease to do so or substantially increase premiums.

We are insured under the property, liability and business interruption policies of our parent, subject to the deductibles and limits under those policies. Our parent has acquired insurance that we and our parent believe to be adequate to prevent loss from material foreseeable risks. However, events may occur for which no insurance is available or for which insurance is not available on terms that are acceptable to our parent. Loss from an event, such as, but not limited to war, riots, pandemics, terrorism or other risks, may not be insured and such a loss may have a material adverse effect on our and our parent’s operations, cash flows and financial position.

Certain of our parent’s ethanol production plants and our related storage tanks, as well as certain of our fuel terminal facilities are located within recognized seismic and flood zones. We believe that the design of these facilities have been modified to fortify them to meet structural requirements for those regions of the country. Our parent has also obtained additional insurance coverage specific to earthquake and flood risks for the applicable plants and fuel terminals. However, there is no assurance that any such facility would remain in operation if a seismic or flood event were to occur.

Additionally, our ability to obtain and maintain adequate insurance may be adversely affected by conditions in the insurance market over which we have no control. In addition, if we experience insurable events, our annual premiums could increase further or insurance may not be available at all. If significant changes in the number or financial solvency of insurance underwriters for the ethanol industry occur, we may be unable to obtain and maintain adequate insurance at a reasonable cost. We cannot assure our unitholders that we will be able to renew our insurance coverage on acceptable terms, if at all, or that we will be able to arrange for adequate alternative coverage in the event of non-renewal. The occurrence of an event that is not fully covered by insurance, the failure by one or more insurers to honor its commitments for an insured event or the loss of insurance coverage could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and ability to make distributions to our unitholders.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

None.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

None.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.

Not applicable.

Item 5. Other Information.

Given the timing of the event, the following information is included in this Form 10-Q pursuant to Item 5.03 “Amendments to Articles of Incorporation or Bylaws; Change in Fiscal Year” of Form 8-K, in lieu of filing a separate Form 8-K.None.
‎

On May 7, 2019, Green Plains Holdings LLC, the general partner of Green Plains Partners LP (the “Partnership”), entered into the First Amendment (the “Amendment”) of the First Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership dated as of July 1, 2015, to make certain revisions in response to changes to the Internal Revenue Code enacted by the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 relating to changes in partnership audit and adjustment procedures.

The foregoing description of the Amendment does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the complete text of the Amendment, a copy of which is filed as Exhibit 10.1 to this Form 10-Q and is incorporated herein by reference.

3133

Table of Contents

Item 6. Exhibits.


~~Exhibit No.~~	~~Description of Exhibit~~
~~10.1~~Exhibit No.	~~First Amendment to the First Amended and Restated Agreement~~Description of ~~Limited Partnership of Green Plains Partners LP, dated as of May 7, 2019~~Exhibit
31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
101	The following information from Green Plains Partners LP Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, ~~2019,~~2020, formatted in Inline Extensible Business Reporting Language ~~(XBRL)~~(iXBRL): (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Operations, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, (iv) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (v) the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
104	The cover page from Green Plains Partners LP Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2020, formatted in iXBRL.

‎

3234

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

~~SIGNATURES~~

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


		GREEN PLAINS PARTNERS LP
		(Registrant)

	By:	Green Plains Holdings LLC, its general partner

Date: May ~~9, 2019~~6, 2020	By:	/s/ Todd A. Becker
		Todd A. Becker
		President and Chief Executive Officer
		(Principal Executive Officer)

Date: May ~~9, 2019~~6, 2020	By:	/s/ ~~John W. Neppl~~G. Patrich Simpkins Jr.
		~~John W. Neppl~~G. Patrich Simpkins Jr.
		Chief Financial Officer
		(Principal Financial Officer)

3335


	Balance at December 31, 2018		Adjustments Due to ASC 842		Balance at January 1, 2019
	(audited)
Balance sheet
Assets
Operating lease right-of-use assets	$	-	$	39,685	$	39,685

Liabilities
Operating lease current liabilities		-		13,534		13,534
Deferred lease liabilities		843		(843)		-
Operating lease long-term liabilities		-		26,994		26,994


	Three Months Ended February 28,
	2019		2018
Total revenues	$	816	$	-
Total operating expenses		387		26
Net income (loss)	$	429	$	(26)

March 31, 2020

December 31, 2019

Weighted average remaining lease term

Weighted average discount rate