UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, DC 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)


☒			QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2021~~2022


☐			TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number: 001-39620

PRAXIS PRECISION MEDICINES, INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)


Delaware									47-5195942
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)									(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

99 High Street, 30th Floor
Boston, MA									02110
(Address of principal executive offices)									(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: 617-300-8460

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class

Trading
Symbol(s)

Name of each exchange
on which registered

Common Stock, par value $0.0001 per share

PRAX

The Nasdaq Global Select Market

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer

☐☒

Accelerated filer

☐

Non-accelerated filer

☒☐

Smaller reporting company

☒

Emerging growth company

☒☐

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒

As of ~~October 29, 2021,~~August 5, 2022, the registrant had ~~44,855,777~~45,576,128 shares of common stock, $0.0001 par value per share, outstanding.

SUMMARY OF THE MATERIAL AND OTHER RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH OUR BUSINESS

Our business is subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, including those described in Part II, Item 1A. "Risk Factors" in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. You should carefully consider these risks and uncertainties when investing in our common stock. The principal risks and uncertainties affecting our business include the following:

•We are a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company and we have incurred significant losses since our inception. We anticipate that we will continue to incur significant losses for the foreseeable future.

•We will need substantial additional funding, and if we are unable to raise capital when needed, we could be forced to delay, reduce or eliminate our product discovery and development programs or commercialization efforts.

•The development and commercialization of drug products is subject to extensive regulation, and the regulatory approval processes of the FDA and comparable foreign authorities are lengthy, time-consuming, and inherently unpredictable. If we are ultimately unable to obtain regulatory approval for our product candidates on a timely basis if at all, our business will be substantially harmed.

•Preclinical and clinical drug development involves a lengthy, complex and expensive process, with an uncertain outcome. The outcome of preclinical testing and early clinical trials may not be predictive of the success of later clinical trials, and the results of our clinical trials may not satisfy the requirements of the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities.

•Our product candidates may cause undesirable side effects or have other properties that could delay or prevent their regulatory approval, limit their commercial potential or result in significant negative consequences following regulatory approval, if obtained.

•We face significant competition in an environment of rapid technological and scientific change, and there is a possibility that our competitors may achieve regulatory approval before us or develop therapies that are safer, more advanced or more effective than ours, which may negatively impact our ability to successfully market or commercialize any product candidates we may develop and ultimately harm our financial condition.

•Our success depends in part on our ability to protect our intellectual property. It is difficult and costly to protect our proprietary rights and technology, and we may not be able to ensure their protection.

•We have entered into, and may enter into, license or other collaboration agreements that impose certain obligations on us. If we fail to comply with our obligations under such agreements with third parties, we could lose license rights that may be important to our business.

•Third-party claims of intellectual property infringement may prevent or delay our product discovery and development efforts.

•We depend on collaborations with third parties for the research, development and commercialization of certain of the product candidates we may develop. If any such collaborations are not successful, we may not be able to realize the market potential of those product candidates.

•Business interruptions resulting from COVID-19 or a similar pandemic, epidemic or outbreak of an infectious disease in the United States or worldwide may adversely affect our business.

•The price of our stock has been and may in the future be volatile, and you could lose all or part of your investment.

SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains express or implied forward-looking statements that are based on our management’s belief and assumptions and on information currently available to our management. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in these forward-looking statements are reasonable, these statements relate to future events or our future operational or financial performance, and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q include, but are not limited to, statements about:

•the success, cost and timing of our product candidate development activities and clinical trials;

•our expectations regarding our ability to obtain and maintain intellectual property protection for our product candidates;

•the ability to license additional intellectual property relating to our product candidates from third parties and to comply with our existing license agreements and collaboration agreements;

•the ability and willingness of our third-party research institution collaborators to continue research and development activities relating to our product candidates;

•our ability to commercialize our product candidates, if approved, in light of the intellectual property rights of others;

•our ability to obtain funding for our operations, including funding necessary to complete further development and, if approved, commercialization of our product candidates;

•the commercialization of our product candidates, if approved;

•our plans to research, develop and, if approved, commercialize our product candidates;

•future agreements with third parties in connection with the commercialization of our product candidates, if approved, and any other approved product;

•the size and growth potential of the markets for our product candidates, and our ability to serve those markets;

•the rate and degree of market acceptance of our product candidates, if approved;

•the pricing and reimbursement of our product candidates, if approved;

•regulatory developments in the United States and foreign countries;

•our ability to contract with third-party suppliers and manufacturers and their ability to perform adequately;

•the success of competing therapies that are or may become available;

•our ability to attract and retain key scientific or management personnel;

•the accuracy of our estimates regarding expenses, future revenue, capital requirements and needs for additional financing; and

•the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic, including mitigation efforts and economic effects, and the ongoing conflict in Ukraine on any of the foregoing or other aspects of our business operations, including but not limited to our ongoing and planned preclinical studies and clinical trials.

In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may,” “should,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “predicts,” “potential,” “continue” or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology. These statements are only predictions. You should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements because they involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors, which are, in some cases, beyond our control and which could materially affect results. Factors that may cause

actual results to differ materially from current expectations include, among other things, those listed under the section titled “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2020~~2021 and under the section titled "Risk Factors" in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. If one or more of these risks or uncertainties occur, or if our underlying assumptions prove to be incorrect, actual events or results may vary significantly from those implied or projected by the forward-looking statements. No forward-looking statement is a guarantee of future performance. You should read this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and the documents that we reference in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and have filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as exhibits hereto completely and with the understanding that our actual future results may be materially different from any future results expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements.

The forward-looking statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q represent our views as of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. We anticipate that subsequent events and developments will cause our views to change. However, while we may elect to update these forward-looking statements at some point in the future, we have no current intention of doing so except to the extent required by applicable law. You should therefore not rely on these forward-looking statements as representing our views as of any date subsequent to the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q also contains estimates, projections and other information concerning our industry, our business and the markets for our product candidates. Information that is based on estimates, forecasts, projections, market research or similar methodologies is inherently subject to uncertainties and actual events or circumstances may differ materially from events and circumstances that are assumed in this information. Unless otherwise expressly stated, we obtained this industry, business, market, and other data from our own internal estimates and research as well as from reports, research surveys, studies, and similar data prepared by market research firms and other third parties, industry, medical and general publications, government data and similar sources. While we are not aware of any misstatements regarding any third-party information presented in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, their estimates, in particular, as they relate to projections, involve numerous assumptions, are subject to risks and uncertainties and are subject to change based on various factors, including those discussed under the section titled “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2020~~2021 and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Table of Contents


		Page
PART I.	FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.	Financial Statements (Unaudited)
	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June S3 ~~eptember~~ 0 ~~30, 2021~~, 2022 and December 31, ~~2020~~2021	1
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three ~~and~~ ~~Nine~~and Six Months Ended ~~September~~ June ~~30,~~ 3 0 , 2022 and 2021 ~~and 2020~~	2
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss for the Three ~~and~~ ~~Nine~~ and Six Months Ended ~~September~~June ~~30,~~3 0 , 2022 and 2021 ~~and 2020~~	3
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of ~~Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock and~~ Stockholders’ Equity ~~(Deficit)~~ for the Three and ~~Nine~~Six Months Ended ~~September~~June ~~30,~~3 0 , 2022 and 2021 ~~and 2020~~	4
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the ~~Nine~~Six Months Ended ~~September~~June ~~30,~~3 0 , 2022 and 2021 ~~and 2020~~	6
	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	7
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	1614
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	2824
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	2825
PART II.	OTHER INFORMATION	3026
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	3026
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	3026
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	3277
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	3378
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	3378
Item 5.	Other Information	3378
Item 6.	Exhibits	3479
Signatures		3580

PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements.

PRAXIS PRECISION MEDICINES, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Unaudited)

(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)


		September 30, 2021		December 31, 2020			June 30, 2022		December 31, 2021
Assets	Assets					Assets
Current assets:	Current assets:					Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	Cash and cash equivalents	$	165,679	$	296,608	Cash and cash equivalents	$	56,039	$	138,704
Marketable securities	Marketable securities	148,691		—		Marketable securities	109,365		137,207
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	Prepaid expenses and other current assets	4,969		5,718		Prepaid expenses and other current assets	10,176		11,498
Total current assets	Total current assets	319,339		302,326		Total current assets	175,580		287,409
Property and equipment, net	Property and equipment, net	625		82		Property and equipment, net	1,134		1,213
Operating lease right-of-use assets	Operating lease right-of-use assets	4,028		754		Operating lease right-of-use assets	3,287		3,653
Other non-current assets	Other non-current assets	416		15		Other non-current assets	416		472
Total assets	Total assets	$	324,408	$	303,177	Total assets	$	180,417	$	292,747
Liabilities and stockholders’ equity	Liabilities and stockholders’ equity					Liabilities and stockholders’ equity
Current liabilities:	Current liabilities:					Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	Accounts payable	$	7,544	$	4,088	Accounts payable	$	11,821	$	10,780
Accrued expenses	Accrued expenses	16,529		10,869		Accrued expenses	25,768		26,844
Operating lease liabilities	Operating lease liabilities	681		763		Operating lease liabilities	949		810
Total current liabilities	Total current liabilities	24,754		15,720		Total current liabilities	38,538		38,434
Long-term liabilities:	Long-term liabilities:					Long-term liabilities:
Non-current portion of operating lease liabilities	Non-current portion of operating lease liabilities	3,732		—		Non-current portion of operating lease liabilities	3,010		3,501
Total liabilities	Total liabilities	28,486		15,720		Total liabilities	41,548		41,935
Commitments and contingencies (Note 6)	Commitments and contingencies (Note 6)	0		0		Commitments and contingencies (Note 6)	0		0
Stockholders’ equity:	Stockholders’ equity:					Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, $0.0001 par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized and no shares issued or outstanding as of September 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020		—		—
Common stock, $0.0001 par value; 150,000,000 shares authorized; 44,784,071 shares issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2021, and 38,268,543 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2020		5		4
Preferred stock, $0.0001 par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized and no shares issued or outstanding as of June 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021						Preferred stock, $0.0001 par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized and no shares issued or outstanding as of June 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021	—		—
Common stock, $0.0001 par value; 150,000,000 shares authorized; 45,575,406 shares issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2022, and 45,300,514 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2021						Common stock, $0.0001 par value; 150,000,000 shares authorized; 45,575,406 shares issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2022, and 45,300,514 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2021	5		5
Additional paid-in capital	Additional paid-in capital	553,975		437,007		Additional paid-in capital	585,070		567,598
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	Accumulated other comprehensive loss	(25)		—		Accumulated other comprehensive loss	(680)		(176)
Accumulated deficit	Accumulated deficit	(258,033)		(149,554)		Accumulated deficit	(445,526)		(316,615)
Total stockholders’ equity	Total stockholders’ equity	295,922		287,457		Total stockholders’ equity	138,869		250,812
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	324,408	$	303,177	Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	180,417	$	292,747

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

PRAXIS PRECISION MEDICINES, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited)

(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)


		Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,					Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
		2021		2020		2021		2020			2022		2021		2022		2021
Operating expenses:	Operating expenses:									Operating expenses:
Research and development	Research and development	$	33,139	$	12,786	$	76,746	$	28,704	Research and development	$	43,620	$	25,678	$	96,272	$	43,607
General and administrative	General and administrative	11,634		3,431		31,929		7,552		General and administrative	16,774		10,805		32,971		20,295
Total operating expenses	Total operating expenses	44,773		16,217		108,675		36,256		Total operating expenses	60,394		36,483		129,243		63,902
Loss from operations	Loss from operations	(44,773)		(16,217)		(108,675)		(36,256)		Loss from operations	(60,394)		(36,483)		(129,243)		(63,902)
Other income:	Other income:									Other income:
Other income, net	Other income, net	73		1		201		134		Other income, net	200		82		332		128
Total other income	Total other income	73		1		201		134		Total other income	200		82		332		128
Loss before income taxes		(44,700)		(16,216)		(108,474)		(36,122)
Benefit from (provision for) income taxes		(5)		—		(5)		8
Net loss	Net loss	$	(44,705)	$	(16,216)	$	(108,479)	$	(36,114)	Net loss	$	(60,194)	$	(36,401)	$	(128,911)	$	(63,774)
Accretion and cumulative dividends on redeemable convertible preferred stock		—		(3,943)		—		(8,046)
Gain on repurchase of redeemable convertible preferred stock		—		—		—		493
Net loss attributable to common stockholders		$	(44,705)	$	(20,159)	$	(108,479)	$	(43,667)
Net loss per share attributable to common stockholders, basic and diluted	Net loss per share attributable to common stockholders, basic and diluted	$	(1.00)	$	(12.10)	$	(2.61)	$	(26.53)	Net loss per share attributable to common stockholders, basic and diluted	$	(1.32)	$	(0.88)	$	(2.83)	$	(1.59)
Weighted average common shares outstanding, basic and diluted	Weighted average common shares outstanding, basic and diluted	44,714,941		1,665,902		41,608,017		1,645,982		Weighted average common shares outstanding, basic and diluted	45,542,600		41,569,782		45,499,131		40,028,807

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

PRAXIS PRECISION MEDICINES, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

(Unaudited)

(Amounts in thousands)


		Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,					Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
		2021		2020		2021		2020			2022		2021		2022		2021
Net loss	Net loss	$	(44,705)	$	(16,216)	$	(108,479)	$	(36,114)	Net loss	$	(60,194)	$	(36,401)	$	(128,911)	$	(63,774)
Unrealized gains (losses) on marketable securities, net of tax		25		—		(25)		—
Net unrealized (losses) gains on marketable securities, net of tax										Net unrealized (losses) gains on marketable securities, net of tax	(74)		36		(504)		(50)
Comprehensive loss	Comprehensive loss	$	(44,680)	$	(16,216)	$	(108,504)	$	(36,114)	Comprehensive loss	$	(60,268)	$	(36,365)	$	(129,415)	$	(63,824)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

PRAXIS PRECISION MEDICINES, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF ~~REDEEMABLE CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK AND~~ STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY ~~(DEFICIT)~~

(Unaudited)

(Amounts in thousands, except share data)


		Common Stock			Additional Paid-In Capital				Accumulated Deficit				Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss					Total Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)			Common Stock				Additional Paid-In Capital		Accumulated Deficit		Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss		Total Stockholders’ Equity
		Shares	Amount														Shares					Amount
Balance at December 31, 2020		38,268,543	$	4			$	437,007			$	(149,554)			$	—					$	287,457
Balance at December 31, 2021																				Balance at December 31, 2021	45,300,514		$	5	$	567,598	$	(316,615)	$	(176)	$	250,812
Stock-based compensation expense	Stock-based compensation expense	—	—		4,666				—				—					4,666		Stock-based compensation expense	—		—		7,886		—		—		7,886
Issuance of common stock from at-the-market public offerings, net of issuance costs																				Issuance of common stock from at-the-market public offerings, net of issuance costs	70,410		—		1,368		—		—		1,368
Vesting of restricted stock units																				Vesting of restricted stock units	81,130		—		—		—		—		—
Shares withheld for taxes for vesting of restricted stock units																				Shares withheld for taxes for vesting of restricted stock units	(17,850)		—		(230)		—		—		(230)
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock options	Issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock options	352,506	—		851				—				—					851		Issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock options	72,278		—		333		—		—		333
Unrealized loss on marketable securities, net of tax		—	—		—				—				(86)					(86)
Change in unrealized loss on marketable securities, net of tax																				Change in unrealized loss on marketable securities, net of tax	—		—		—		—		(430)		(430)
Net loss	Net loss	—	—		—				(27,373)				—					(27,373)		Net loss	—		—		—		(68,717)		—		(68,717)
Balance at March 31, 2021		38,621,049	$	4	$	442,524			$	(176,927)			$	(86)				$	265,515
Balance at March 31, 2022																				Balance at March 31, 2022	45,506,482		$	5	$	576,955	$	(385,332)	$	(606)	$	191,022
Stock-based compensation expense	Stock-based compensation expense	—	—		5,400				—				—					5,400		Stock-based compensation expense	—		—		7,611		—		—		7,611
Issuance of common stock from follow-on public offering, net of offering costs of $229		5,750,000	1		98,412				—				—					98,413
Issuance of common stock under employee stock purchase plan																				Issuance of common stock under employee stock purchase plan	51,645		—		454		—		—		454
Vesting of restricted stock units																				Vesting of restricted stock units	6,361		—		—		—		—		—
Shares withheld for taxes for vesting of restricted stock units																				Shares withheld for taxes for vesting of restricted stock units	(2,225)		—		(17)		—		—		(17)
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock options	Issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock options	322,113	—		809				—				—					809		Issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock options	13,143		—		67		—		—		67
Change unrealized loss on marketable securities, net of tax		—	—		—				—				36					36
Change in unrealized loss on marketable securities, net of tax																				Change in unrealized loss on marketable securities, net of tax	—		—		—		—		(74)		(74)
Net loss	Net loss	—	—		—				(36,401)				—					(36,401)		Net loss	—		—		—		(60,194)		—		(60,194)
Balance at June 30, 2021		44,693,162	$	5	$	547,145			$	(213,328)			$	(50)				$	333,772
Stock-based compensation expense		—	—		6,521				—				—					6,521
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock options		90,909	—		309				—				—					309
Change unrealized loss on marketable securities, net of tax		—	—		—				—				25					25
Net loss		—	—		—				(44,705)				—					(44,705)
Balance at September 30, 2021		44,784,071	$	5	$	553,975			$	(258,033)			$	(25)				$	295,922
Balance at June 30, 2022																				Balance at June 30, 2022	45,575,406		$	5	$	585,070	$	(445,526)	$	(680)	$	138,869

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

PRAXIS PRECISION MEDICINES, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF ~~REDEEMABLE CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK AND~~ STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY ~~(DEFICIT)~~(continued)

(Unaudited)

(Amounts in thousands, except share data)

Series A
Redeemable
Convertible
Preferred Stock Series B
Redeemable
Convertible
Preferred Stock Series B-1
Redeemable
Convertible
Preferred Stock Series C
Redeemable
Convertible
Preferred Stock Series C-1
Redeemable
Convertible
Preferred Stock Common Stock Additional
Paid-In
Capital Accumulated
Deficit Accumulated Other
Comprehensive Loss Total
Stockholders’
Equity (Deficit)
Shares Amount Shares Amount Shares Amount Shares Amount Shares Amount Shares Amount
Balance at December 31, 2019 8,075,799 $ 9,932 14,913,704 $ 49,969 2,666,666 $ 10,431 9,805,827 $ 50,789 — $ — 1,621,880 $ 1 $ — $ (81,009) $ — $ (81,008)
Repurchase of Series C redeemable convertible preferred stock — — — — — — (5,825,243) (30,493) — — — — — 493 — 493
Series C redeemable convertible preferred stock issuance costs — — — — — — — (37) — — — — — — — —
Vesting of restricted common stock awards — — — — — — — — — — 13,143 — — — — —
Stock-based compensation expense — — — — — — — — — — — — 147 — — 147
Accretion of redeemable convertible preferred stock to redemption value — 160 — 890 — 199 — 815 — — — — (147) (1,917) — (2,064)
Net loss — — — — — — — — — — — — — (8,330) — (8,330)
Balance at March 31, 2020 8,075,799 $ 10,092 14,913,704 $ 50,859 2,666,666 $ 10,630 3,980,584 $ 21,074 — $ — 1,635,023 $ 1 $ — $ (90,763) $ — $ (90,762)
Issuance of Series C redeemable convertible preferred stock, net of issuance costs of $4 — — — — — — 4,563,108 23,496 — — — — — — — —
Vesting of restricted common stock awards — — — �� — — — — — — 13,142 — — — — —
Stock-based compensation expense — — — — — — — — — — — — 285 — — 285
Accretion of redeemable convertible preferred stock to redemption value — 162 — 890 — 198 — 789 — — — — (285) (1,754) — (2,039)
Net loss — — — — — — — — — — — — — (11,568) — (11,568)
Balance at June 30, 2020 8,075,799 $ 10,254 14,913,704 $ 51,749 2,666,666 $ 10,828 8,543,692 $ 45,359 — $ — 1,648,165 $ 1 $ — $ (104,085) $ — $ (104,084)
Issuance of Series C-1 redeemable convertible preferred stock, net of issuance costs of $154 — — — — — — — — 19,444,453 110,096 — — — — — —
Vesting of restricted common stock awards — — — — — — — — — — 13,142 — — — — —
Stock-based compensation expense — — — — — — — — — — — — 953 — — 953
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock options — — — — — — — — — — 11,628 — 27 — — 27
Accretion of redeemable convertible preferred stock to redemption value — 162 — 899 — 201 — 885 — 1,796 — — (980) (2,963) — (3,943)
Net Loss — — — — — — — — — — — — — (16,216) — (16,216)
Balance at September 30, 2020 8,075,799 $ 10,416 14,913,704 $ 52,648 2,666,666 $ 11,029 8,543,692 $ 46,244 19,444,453 $ 111,892 1,672,935 $ 1 $ — $ (123,264) $ — $ (123,263)


	Common Stock			Additional Paid-In Capital		Accumulated Deficit		Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss		Total Stockholders’ Equity
	Shares	Amount
Balance at December 31, 2020	38,268,543	$	4	$	437,007	$	(149,554)	$	—	$	287,457
Stock-based compensation expense	—	—		4,666		—		—		4,666
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock options	352,506	—		851		—		—		851
Change in unrealized loss on marketable securities, net of tax	—	—		—		—		(86)		(86)
Net loss	—	—		—		(27,373)		—		(27,373)
Balance at March 31, 2021	38,621,049	$	4	$	442,524	$	(176,927)	$	(86)	$	265,515
Stock-based compensation expense	—	—		5,400		—		—		5,400
Issuance of common stock from follow-on public offering, net of offering costs of $229	5,750,000	1		98,412		—		—		98,413
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock options	322,113	—		809		—		—		809
Change in unrealized loss on marketable securities, net of tax	—	—		—		—		36		36
Net loss	—	—		—		(36,401)		—		(36,401)
Balance at June 30, 2021	44,693,162	$	5	$	547,145	$	(213,328)	$	(50)	$	333,772

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

PRAXIS PRECISION MEDICINES, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

(Amounts in thousands)


		Nine Months Ended September 30,					Six Months Ended June 30,
		2021		2020			2022		2021
Cash flows from operating activities:	Cash flows from operating activities:					Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss	Net loss	$	(108,479)	$	(36,114)	Net loss	$	(128,911)	$	(63,774)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:	Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:					Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation expense	Depreciation expense	89		30		Depreciation expense	212		50
Stock-based compensation expense	Stock-based compensation expense	16,587		1,385		Stock-based compensation expense	15,497		10,066
Non-cash operating lease expense	Non-cash operating lease expense	942		517		Non-cash operating lease expense	366		475
Amortization of premiums and discounts on marketable securities, net	Amortization of premiums and discounts on marketable securities, net	1,454		—		Amortization of premiums and discounts on marketable securities, net	598		815
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:	Changes in operating assets and liabilities:					Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	Prepaid expenses and other current assets	749		(398)		Prepaid expenses and other current assets	722		(3,531)
Accounts payable	Accounts payable	4,031		544		Accounts payable	1,041		3,708
Accrued expenses	Accrued expenses	5,481		2,160		Accrued expenses	(547)		(3,106)
Operating lease liabilities	Operating lease liabilities	(566)		(515)		Operating lease liabilities	(352)		(373)
Other	Other	15		(4)		Other	56		(65)
Net cash used in operating activities	Net cash used in operating activities	(79,697)		(32,395)		Net cash used in operating activities	(111,318)		(55,735)
Cash flows from investing activities:	Cash flows from investing activities:					Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchases of property and equipment	Purchases of property and equipment	(519)		—		Purchases of property and equipment	(399)		(69)
Purchases of marketable securities	Purchases of marketable securities	(164,170)		—		Purchases of marketable securities	(83,022)		(164,170)
Maturities of marketable securities	Maturities of marketable securities	14,000		—		Maturities of marketable securities	109,761		—
Net cash used in investing activities		(150,689)		—
Net cash provided (used) in investing activities						Net cash provided (used) in investing activities	26,340		(164,239)
Cash flows from financing activities:	Cash flows from financing activities:					Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from follow-on public offering, net of issuance costs	Proceeds from follow-on public offering, net of issuance costs	98,480		—		Proceeds from follow-on public offering, net of issuance costs	—		98,576
Payment of issuance costs for initial public offering and issuance of redeemable convertible preferred stock		(575)		(1,117)
Proceeds from exercise of options to purchase common stock		1,968		27
Proceeds from issuance of redeemable convertible preferred stock, net of issuance costs		—		133,442
Repurchase of Series C redeemable convertible preferred stock		—		(30,000)
Proceeds from at-the-market offerings, net of issuance costs						Proceeds from at-the-market offerings, net of issuance costs	1,368		—
Payment of issuance costs for at-the-market offerings and initial public offering						Payment of issuance costs for at-the-market offerings and initial public offering	(262)		(575)
Payments of tax withholdings related to vesting of restricted stock units						Payments of tax withholdings related to vesting of restricted stock units	(246)		—
Proceeds from exercise of options and employee stock purchase plan contributions						Proceeds from exercise of options and employee stock purchase plan contributions	853		1,660
Net cash provided by financing activities	Net cash provided by financing activities	99,873		102,352		Net cash provided by financing activities	1,713		99,661
Decrease in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash	Decrease in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash	(130,513)		69,957		Decrease in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash	(83,265)		(120,313)
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, beginning of period	Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, beginning of period	297,208		45,415		Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, beginning of period	139,720		297,208
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, end of period	Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, end of period	$	166,695	$	115,372	Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, end of period	$	56,455	$	176,895
Reconciliation of cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash:	Reconciliation of cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash:					Reconciliation of cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash:
Cash and cash equivalents	Cash and cash equivalents	165,679		114,772		Cash and cash equivalents	56,039		175,879
Restricted cash	Restricted cash	1,016		600		Restricted cash	416		1,016
Total cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash	Total cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash	$	166,695	$	115,372	Total cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash	$	56,455	$	176,895
Supplemental disclosures of non-cash activities:	Supplemental disclosures of non-cash activities:					Supplemental disclosures of non-cash activities:
Operating lease right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for operating lease liabilities	Operating lease right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for operating lease liabilities	$	4,086	$	—	Operating lease right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for operating lease liabilities	$	—	$	4,086
Deferred offering costs included in accrued expenses		$	68	$	925
Purchases of property and equipment included in accrued expenses		$	116	$	—
Accretion of redeemable convertible preferred stock to redemption value		$	—	$	8,046
Offering costs included in accounts payable and accrued expenses						Offering costs included in accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	—	$	163
Purchases of property and equipment included in accounts payable						Purchases of property and equipment included in accounts payable	$	—	$	83

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

PRAXIS PRECISION MEDICINES, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

1. Nature of the Business

Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (“Praxis” or the “Company”) is a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company translating genetic insights into the development of therapies for central nervous system ~~(“CNS”~~("CNS") disorders characterized by neuronal excitation-inhibition imbalance. Normal brain function requires a delicate balance of excitation and inhibition in neuronal circuits, which, when dysregulated, can lead to abnormal function and disease. The Company is applying insights from genetic epilepsies to both rare and more prevalent neurological disorders, using its understanding of shared biological targets and circuits in the brain. The Company applies a deliberate and pragmatic precision approach, leveraging a suite of translational tools including novel transgenic and predictive translational animal models and electrophysiology markers, to enable an efficient path to proof-of-concept in patients. Through this approach, the Company has established a broad CNS portfolio with multiple programs, including ~~multiple disclosed programs~~product candidates across ~~CNS disorders, including depression, epilepsy,~~ movement disorders, epilepsy and ~~pain syndromes,~~psychiatric disorders, with 3three clinical-stage product candidates. The Company ~~intends~~expects to develop differentiated therapies that can deliver long-term benefits to human health by meaningfully impacting patients and society. The Company’s most advanced programs, PRAX-114 and PRAX-944, are currentlyannounce topline results from the Phase 2b clinical trial in ~~Phase 2/3 and Phase 2 development, respectively. PRAX-114 is an extrasynaptic GABA~~A receptor preferring positive allosteric modulator currently being developed for the treatment of major depressive disorder and for the treatment of women with menopausal and mood symptoms. The Company plans to initiate Phase 2 trials of PRAX-114 in post-traumatic stress disorder and essential tremor, ~~("ET") in~~or ET, for its lead clinical-stage movement disorders program, the ~~fourth quarter~~initiation of ~~2021 and intends to disclose plans~~two first-in-patient studies for ~~a Phase 2b trial in women with menopausal and mood symptoms in the fourth quarter of 2021. PRAX-944 is a selective~~its lead small molecule ~~inhibitor~~epilepsy program and its lead antisense oligonucleotide, or ASO, epilepsy program and the launch of ~~T-type calcium channels currently being developed for the treatment of ET. The Company plans to initiate a Phase 2 trial of PRAX-944 in Parkinson's disease in the first half of 2022.~~an additional clinical development program this year. In addition, the Company ~~completed~~has established a ~~Phase 1 healthy volunteer trial~~robust pipeline of ~~its third clinical program, PRAX-562, a persistent sodium current blocker, for~~preclinical stage programs through internal research and in-licensing, including one of the ~~potential treatment~~largest portfolios of ~~a broad range of rare CNS disorders, such as severe pediatric epilepsies and rare adult cephalgias. The Company plans to initiate a Phase 2 trial in rare adult cephalgias~~targeted epilepsy programs in the fourth quarter of 2021. In addition to the clinical programs, the Company has multiple disclosed preclinical and discovery product candidates in development for severe genetic epilepsies and multiple undisclosed preclinical and discovery product candidates for a range of CNS disorders.industry.

Praxis was incorporated in 2015 and commenced operations in 2016. The Company has funded its operations primarily with proceeds from the issuance of ~~convertible debt and~~ redeemable convertible preferred stock and from the sale of common stock through an initial public offering, ~~and~~ a follow-on public ~~offering.~~offering and at-the-market offerings under its shelf registration statement. From inception through ~~September~~June 30, ~~2021,~~2022, the Company raised ~~$509.4~~$517.8 million in aggregate cash proceeds from these transactions, net of issuance costs.

In May 2021, the Company completed a follow-on public offering in which the Company issued and sold 5,750,000 shares of its common stock at a public offering price of $18.25 per share, including 750,000 shares of common stock issued and sold pursuant to the underwriters' exercise, in full, of their option to purchase additional shares of common stock, for aggregate gross proceeds of $104.9 million. The Company received approximately $98.4 million in net proceeds after deducting discounts, commissions and offering expenses payable by the Company.

The Company is subject to risks and uncertainties common to early-stage companies in the biotechnology industry, including but not limited to, risks associated with completing preclinical studies and clinical trials, receiving regulatory approvals for product candidates, development by competitors of new biopharmaceutical products, dependence on key personnel, protection of proprietary technology, compliance with government regulations and the ability to secure additional capital to fund operations. Programs currently under development will require significant additional research and development efforts, including preclinical and clinical testing and regulatory approval, prior to commercialization. These efforts require significant amounts of additional capital, adequate personnel and infrastructure and extensive compliance-reporting capabilities. Even if the Company’s product development efforts are successful, it is uncertain when, if ever, the Company will realize revenue from product sales.

Liquidity

In accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2014-15, Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40), the Company has evaluated whether there are conditions and events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that these condensed consolidated financial statements are issued.

The Company has incurred recurring losses since its inception, including a net ~~losses~~loss of ~~$108.5~~$128.9 million for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2021.~~2022. In addition, as of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2021,~~2022, the Company had an accumulated deficit of ~~$258.0~~$445.5 million. The Company expects to continue to generate operating losses for the foreseeable future.

The Company expects that its cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities as of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2021~~2022 of ~~$314.4~~$165.4 million will be sufficient to fund the operating ~~expenses~~expenditures and capital expenditure requirements necessary to advance its research efforts and clinical trials for at least one year from the date of issuance of these condensed consolidated financial statements. The future viability of the Company is dependent on its ability to raise additional capital to finance its operations. The Company’s inability to raise capital as and when needed could have a negative impact on its financial condition and ability to pursue its business strategies. There can be no assurance that the

current operating plan will be achieved or that additional funding will be available on terms acceptable to the Company, or at all.

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“GAAP”). Any reference in these notes to applicable guidance is meant to refer to the authoritative GAAP as found in the Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) and ASUs of the FASB.

The significant accounting policies used in preparation of these condensed consolidated financial statements for the three and ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2021~~2022 are consistent with those discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements included in the Company's ~~2020~~2021 Annual Report on Form 10-K, other than as noted below.

Unaudited Interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Information

The accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2021,~~2022, the condensed consolidated statements of operations for the three and ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2021~~2022 and ~~2020,~~2021, the condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive loss for the three and ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2021~~2022 and ~~2020,~~2021, the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2021~~2022 and ~~2020~~2021 and the condensed consolidated statements of ~~redeemable convertible preferred stock and~~ stockholders’ equity ~~(deficit)~~ for the three and ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2021~~2022 and ~~2020~~2021 are unaudited. The unaudited interim financial statements have been prepared on the same basis as the audited annual consolidated financial statements, and in the opinion of management reflect all adjustments, which include only normal recurring adjustments necessary for the fair statement of the Company’s financial position as of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2021,~~2022, the results of its operations for the three and ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2021~~2022 and ~~2020~~2021 and its cash flows for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2021~~2022 and ~~2020.~~2021. Financial statement disclosures for the three and ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2021~~2022 and ~~2020~~2021 are condensed and do not include all disclosures required for an annual set of financial statements in accordance with GAAP.

The results for the three and ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2021~~2022 are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for the year ended December 31, ~~2021,~~2022, any other interim periods, or any future year or period.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the condensed consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of expenses during the reporting periods. Significant estimates and assumptions reflected in these condensed consolidated financial statements include, but are not limited to, ~~the accrual for~~accrued and prepaid research and development ~~expense,~~expenses, stock-based compensation expense and the recoverability of the Company’s net deferred tax assets and related valuation ~~of equity awards prior to the Company's initial public offering.~~allowance. Estimates are periodically reviewed in light of changes in circumstances, facts and experience. Changes in estimates are recorded in the period in which they become known. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

The Company does not expect any recently issued accounting pronouncements to have a material impact on its financial statements.

~~Marketable Securities~~

The Company invests its excess cash in money market funds and debt instruments of the U.S. Treasury, financial institutions, corporations and U.S. government agencies with strong credit ratings and an investment grade rating at or above A-1 or P-1 by two of the three nationally recognized statistical rating organizations. The Company does not believe that it is exposed to more than a nominal amount of credit risk in its marketable securities. The Company has established guidelines relative to diversification and maturities that maintain safety and liquidity, and periodically reviews and modifies these guidelines to maximize trends in yields and interest rates without compromising safety and liquidity. The Company classifies its investments in debt instruments as available-for-sale. Available-for-sale investments are reported at fair value at each balance sheet date, and include any unrealized holding gains and losses in accumulated other comprehensive gain (loss), a component of stockholders’ equity. Realized gains and losses are included in the Company's condensed consolidated statements of operations. All of the Company's available-for-sale securities are available for use in its current operations. As a result, the Company has categorized all of these securities as current assets even though the stated maturity of some individual securities may be one year or more beyond the balance sheet date.

The Company evaluates securities for impairment at the end of each reporting period. Impairment is evaluated considering numerous factors, and their relative significance varies depending on the situation. Factors considered include whether a decline in fair value below the amortized cost basis is due to credit-related factors or non-credit-related factors, the financial condition and near-term prospects of the Company, and the Company's intent and ability to hold the investment to allow for an anticipated recovery in fair value. A credit-related impairment is recognized as an allowance on the balance sheet with a corresponding adjustment to earnings. Any impairment that is not credit-related is recognized in other comprehensive (loss) income, net of applicable taxes unless deemed other than temporary.

~~Recent Accounting Pronouncements~~

~~Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements~~

~~In December 2019, the FASB issued ASU No. 2019-12,~~ ~~Income Taxes (Topic 740)—Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes~~ ("ASU 2019-12"). The ASU simplifies the accounting for income taxes by eliminating certain exceptions to the guidance in ASC 740, Income Taxes, related to the approach for allocating income tax expense or benefit for the year to continuing operations, discontinued operations, other comprehensive income, and other charges or credits recorded directly to shareholders’ equity; the methodology for calculating income taxes in an interim period; and the recognition of deferred tax liabilities for outside basis differences. On January 1, 2021, the Company early adopted ASU 2019-12 on a prospective basis, with no material impact on its condensed consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

~~Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements~~

~~In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13,~~ ~~Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326)—Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments,~~ which has been subsequently amended by ASU No. 2018-19, ASU No. 2019-04, ASU No. 2019-05, ASU No. 2019-10, ASU No. 2019-11 and ASU No. 2020-03 (“ASU 2016-13”). The provisions of ASU 2016-13 modify the impairment model to utilize an expected loss methodology in place of the currently used incurred loss methodology and require a consideration of a broader range of reasonable and supportable information to inform credit loss estimates. ASU 2016-13 is effective for the Company on January 1, 2023, with early adoption permitted. Given the Company will lose its emerging growth company status on December 31, 2021, it expects to reflect the adoption of this standard in its annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021. The Company is evaluating the potential impact that this standard may have on its financial position and results of operations, but does not expect the impact to be significant.

3. Marketable Securities

The following is a summary of the Company's investment portfolio ~~at September~~as of June 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021 (in thousands). ~~The~~


	As of June 30, 2022
			Gross Unrealized					Estimated
	Cost		Gains		Losses			Fair Value
Available-for-sale securities:
Corporate debt securities	$	45,039	$	—		$	(609)	$	44,430
Commercial paper	32,958		—			—		32,958
Debt securities issued by U.S. government agencies	32,048		—			(71)		31,977
Total securities with a maturity of one year or less	$	110,045	$	—		$	(680)	$	109,365

Total available-for-sale securities	$	110,045	$	—		$	(680)	$	109,365


	As of December 31, 2021
			Gross Unrealized					Estimated
	Cost		Gains		Losses			Fair Value
Available-for-sale securities:
Corporate debt securities	$	52,214	$	—		$	(31)	$	52,183
Commercial paper	34,993		—			—		34,993
Debt securities issued by U.S. government agencies	12,111		—			(8)		12,103
Other debt securities	6,398		1			—		6,399
Total securities with a maturity of one year or less	$	105,716	$	1		$	(39)	$	105,678

Corporate debt securities	31,667		—			(138)		31,529
Total securities with a maturity of one to two years	$	31,667	$	—		$	(138)	$	31,529
Total available-for-sale securities	$	137,383	$	1		$	(177)	$	137,207

As of June 30, 2022, the Company ~~did not have any marketable~~had 13 securities aswith a total fair market value of $76.4 million in an unrealized loss position. As of December 31, ~~2020.~~

Gross Unrealized Estimated
Cost Gains Losses Fair Value
Available-for-sale securities:
Corporate debt securities $ 51,642 $ 1 $ (10) $ 51,633
Commercial paper 41,976 — — 41,976
Debt securities issued by U.S. government agencies 12,156 6 — 12,162
Other debt securities $ 6,428 $ — $ (1) 6,427
Total securities with a maturity of one year or less $ 112,202 $ 7 $ (11) $ 112,198
Corporate debt securities 36,514 — (21) 36,493
Total securities with a maturity of one to two years $ 36,514 $ — $ (21) $ 36,493
Total available-for-sale securities $ 148,716 $ 7 $ (32) $ 148,691

~~As of September 30,~~ 2021, the Company had 14 securities with a total fair market value of ~~$87.5~~$95.8 million in an unrealized loss position. The Company believes that any unrealized losses associated with the decline in value of its securities is temporary and primarily related to the change in market interest rates since purchase, and believes that it is more likely than not that it will be able to hold its debt securities to maturity. Therefore, the Company anticipates a full recovery of the amortized cost basis of its debt securities at ~~maturity.~~maturity and an allowance was not recognized.

Securities are evaluated for impairment at the end of each reporting period. The Company did not record any impairment related to its available-for-sale securities during the three and ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, 2022 and 2021.

4. Fair Value Measurements

Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The Company categorizes financial assets measured at fair value based on a fair value hierarchy. The following fair value hierarchy is used to classify financial assets based on observable inputs and unobservable inputs used to value the financial assets:

•Level 1: Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical assets;

•Level 2: Quoted prices for similar assets in active markets, quoted prices in markets that are not active, or inputs which are unobservable, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset; or

•Level 3: Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both significant to the valuation of the asset and unobservable.

The following tables present information about the Company’s financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis and ~~indicates~~indicate the level of the fair value hierarchy utilized to determine such fair values as of June 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021 (in thousands):


		As of September 30, 2021									As of June 30, 2022
		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total			Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Assets:	Assets:									Assets:
Cash equivalents:	Cash equivalents:									Cash equivalents:
Money market funds	Money market funds	$	151,452	$	—	$	—	$	151,452	Money market funds	$	35,552	$	—	$	—	$	35,552
Marketable securities:	Marketable securities:									Marketable securities:
Corporate debt securities	Corporate debt securities	—		88,126		—		88,126		Corporate debt securities	—		44,430		—		44,430
Commercial paper	Commercial paper	—		41,976		—		41,976		Commercial paper	—		32,958		—		32,958
Debt securities issued by U.S. government agencies	Debt securities issued by U.S. government agencies	12,162		—		—		12,162		Debt securities issued by U.S. government agencies	31,977		—		—		31,977
Other debt securities		—		6,427		—		6,427
		$	163,614	$	136,529	$	—	$	300,143		$	67,529	$	77,388	$	—	$	144,917

As of December 31, 2020
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
Assets:
Cash equivalents:
Money market funds $ 290,931 $ — $ — $ 290,931
$ 290,931 $ — $ — $ 290,931


	As of December 31, 2021
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Assets:
Cash equivalents:
Money market funds	$	131,372	$	—	$	—	$	131,372
Marketable securities:
Corporate debt securities	—		83,712		—		83,712
Commercial paper	—		34,993		—		34,993
Debt securities issued by U.S. government agencies	12,103		—		—		12,103
Other debt securities	—		6,399		—		6,399
	$	143,475	$	125,104	$	—	$	268,579

5. Accrued Expenses

Accrued expenses consisted of the following (in thousands):


		September 30, 2021		December 31, 2020			June 30, 2022		December 31, 2021
Accrued external research and development expenses	Accrued external research and development expenses	$	10,348	$	4,206	Accrued external research and development expenses	$	20,067	$	17,763
Accrued personnel-related expenses	Accrued personnel-related expenses	3,909		5,516		Accrued personnel-related expenses	2,420		7,180
Accrued professional services		1,324		133
Accrued other	Accrued other	948		1,014		Accrued other	3,281		1,901
Total accrued expenses	Total accrued expenses	$	16,529	$	10,869	Total accrued expenses	$	25,768	$	26,844

6. Commitments and Contingencies

In May 2021, the Company entered into a sublease agreement for office space located in Boston, Massachusetts ~~which became the Company's corporate headquarters beginning on October 1, 2021. The sublease~~that expires on January 31, 2026, with no option to renew or terminate early. The base rent increases by approximately 2% annually. The Company issued a letter of credit to the landlord ~~for $0.4 million~~ related to the security deposit, secured by restricted cash, which is reflected within other non-current assets on the accompanying condensed consolidated balance ~~sheet~~sheets as of ~~September~~June 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021. This lease qualifies as an operating lease. At inception, the Company recorded an operating lease right-of-use asset and operating lease liability of $4.1 million. As of September 30, 2021, the Company had an operating lease right-of-use asset of $3.8 million, current operating lease liability of approximately $0.5 million, and non-current operating lease liability of approximately $3.7 million included in the condensed consolidated balance sheet.

~~Future lease payments under the non-cancellable sublease agreement as of September 30, 2021 were as follows (in thousands):~~

Year Ended December 31, Future Lease Payments
2021 $ —
2022 1,160
2023 1,270
2024 1,296
2025 1,321
2026 110
Total future lease payments $ 5,157
Less: interest (942)
Present value of operating lease liabilities $ 4,215

~~As of September 30, 2021, the remaining lease term and discount rate of the sublease agreement was4.3 years and 9.0%, respectively.~~

1110

In October 2018, the Company entered into a sublease agreement for office space located in Cambridge, Massachusetts that expires on December 31, 2021, with no option to renew or terminate early. The base rent increases by approximately 1% annually. The Company issued a letter of credit to the landlord for $0.6 million related to the security deposit, secured by restricted cash, which is reflected within prepaid expenses and other current assets on the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets as of September 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, as the lease term expires less than twelve months from the condensed consolidated balance sheet dates. This lease qualifies as an operating lease.

7. Common Stock and Preferred Stock

Common Stock

As of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2021~~2022 and December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, the authorized capital stock of the Company included 150,000,000 shares of common stock, $0.0001 par value.

As of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2021~~2022 and December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, the Company did not hold any treasury shares.

Shares Reserved for Future Issuance

The Company has reserved the following shares of common stock for future issuance:


		September 30, 2021	December 31, 2020		June 30, 2022	December 31, 2021
Shares reserved for exercise of outstanding stock options	Shares reserved for exercise of outstanding stock options	6,414,070	5,944,546	Shares reserved for exercise of outstanding stock options	9,826,672	6,468,501
Shares reserved for future awards under the 2020 Stock Option and Incentive Plan	Shares reserved for future awards under the 2020 Stock Option and Incentive Plan	3,011,438	3,036,776	Shares reserved for future awards under the 2020 Stock Option and Incentive Plan	957,739	2,667,780
Shares reserved for future awards under the 2020 Employee Stock Purchase Plan	Shares reserved for future awards under the 2020 Employee Stock Purchase Plan	654,204	327,102	Shares reserved for future awards under the 2020 Employee Stock Purchase Plan	929,661	654,204
Shares reserved for vesting of restricted stock units	Shares reserved for vesting of restricted stock units	383,196	—	Shares reserved for vesting of restricted stock units	856,287	440,079
Total shares of authorized common stock reserved for future issuance	Total shares of authorized common stock reserved for future issuance	10,462,908	9,308,424	Total shares of authorized common stock reserved for future issuance	12,570,359	10,230,564

Preferred Stock

As of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2021~~2022 and December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, the authorized capital stock of the Company included 10,000,000 shares of undesignated preferred stock, $0.0001 par value.

8. Stock-Based Compensation

2020 Stock Option and Incentive Plan

The total number of shares of common stock authorized for issuance under the 2020 Stock Option and Incentive Plan (the "2020 Plan”) as of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2021~~2022 and December 31, ~~2020~~2021 was ~~5,184,455~~7,449,480 shares and ~~3,271,028~~5,184,455 shares, respectively.

2017 Stock Incentive Plan

The total number of shares of common stock authorized for issuance under the 2017 Stock Incentive Plan (the "2017 Plan”) as of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2021~~2022 and December 31, ~~2020~~2021 was 5,937,763 shares. Any authorization to issue new options under the 2017 Plan was cancelled upon the effectiveness of the 2020 Plan and no further awards will be granted under the 2017 Plan.

2020 Employee Stock Purchase Plan

The total number of shares of common stock authorized for issuance under the 2020 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the "2020 ESPP”) as of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2021~~2022 and December 31, ~~2020~~2021 was ~~654,204~~981,306 shares and ~~327,102~~654,204 shares, respectively.

Restricted Stock Units

The following table summarizes the Company’s restricted stock unit activity:


		Shares	Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value			Shares	Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
Unvested as of December 31, 2020		—	$	—
Unvested as of December 31, 2021					Unvested as of December 31, 2021	440,079	$	41.86
Issued	Issued	403,113	46.57		Issued	625,578	16.06
Vested	Vested	—	—		Vested	(87,491)	49.86
Forfeited	Forfeited	(19,917)	46.35		Forfeited	(121,879)	23.85
Unvested as of September 30, 2021		383,196	$	46.58
Unvested as of June 30, 2022					Unvested as of June 30, 2022	856,287	$	24.76

As of June 30, 2022, total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested restricted stock units was $18.6 million, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 3.11 years.

Stock Options

The following table summarizes the Company’s stock option activity:

Number of
Shares Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
per Share Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term Aggregate
Intrinsic Value
(In years) (In thousands)
Outstanding as of December 31, 2020 5,944,546 $ 7.47
Granted 1,644,153 43.26
Exercised (765,528) 2.57 $ 18,009
Cancelled or Forfeited (409,101) 14.94
Outstanding as of September 30, 2021 6,414,070 $ 16.75 8.80 $ 54,154
Exercisable as of September 30, 2021 1,702,574 $ 6.17 8.23 $ 21,152
Vested and expected to vest as of September 30, 2021 6,414,070 $ 16.75 8.80 $ 54,154


	Number of Shares	Weighted Average Exercise Price per Share		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term	Aggregate Intrinsic Value
				(In years)	(In thousands)
Outstanding as of December 31, 2021	6,468,501	$	16.92
Granted	3,881,427	9.38
Exercised	(85,421)	4.64			$	785
Cancelled or Forfeited	(437,835)	22.94
Outstanding as of June 30, 2022	9,826,672	$	13.79	8.70	$	753
Exercisable as of June 30, 2022	2,904,632	$	13.88	7.63	$	141
Vested and expected to vest as of June 30, 2022	9,826,672	$	13.79	8.70	$	753

The aggregate intrinsic value of stock options outstanding, exercisable, and vested and expected to vest is calculated as the difference between the exercise price of the underlying stock options and the estimated fair value of the Company’s common stock for those stock options that had exercise prices lower than the estimated fair value of the Company’s common stock at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2021.~~2022. The aggregate intrinsic value of stock options exercised is calculated as the difference between the exercise price of the underlying stock options and the estimated fair value of the Company’s common stock on the date of exercise for those stock options that had exercise prices lower than the estimated fair value of the Company’s common stock on the exercise date.

Stock Option Valuation

The weighted-average assumptions that the Company used in the Black-Scholes option pricing model to determine the grant-date fair value of stock options granted to employees and non-employees on the date of grant were as follows for the three and ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2021:~~2022:


		Three Months Ended September 30,		Nine Months Ended September 30,			Three Months Ended June 30,			Six Months Ended June 30,
		2021		2021			2022			2022
Risk-free interest rate	Risk-free interest rate	1.01	%	0.77	%	Risk-free interest rate	3.15		%	2.50		%
Expected term (in years)	Expected term (in years)	6.00		6.10		Expected term (in years)	6.01			6.07
Expected volatility	Expected volatility	85.98	%	85.60	%	Expected volatility	88.42		%	89.23		%
Expected dividend yield	Expected dividend yield	—	%	—	%	Expected dividend yield	—		%	—		%
Weighted average grant-date fair value per share						Weighted average grant-date fair value per share	$	2.53		$	7.02

~~The weighted-average grant-date fair value~~As of ~~the Company’s~~June 30, 2022, total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested stock options ~~granted during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2021~~ was ~~$13.45 per share and $30.91 per share, respectively.~~

$65.3 million, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.59 years.

Stock-Based Compensation

Stock-based compensation expense was allocated as follows (in thousands):


		Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,					Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
		2021		2020		2021		2020			2022		2021		2022		2021
Research and development	Research and development	$	2,787	$	384	$	7,136	$	639	Research and development	$	2,987	$	2,031	$	6,201	$	4,349
General and administrative	General and administrative	3,734		569		9,451		746		General and administrative	4,624		3,369		9,296		5,717
Total stock-based compensation expense	Total stock-based compensation expense	$	6,521	$	953	$	16,587	$	1,385	Total stock-based compensation expense	$	7,611	$	5,400	$	15,497	$	10,066

As of September 30, 2021, total unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested stock-based awards was $75.2 million, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.85 years.

9. Net Loss per Share

~~Basic and diluted net loss per share attributable to common stockholders was calculated as follows (in thousands, except share and per share data):~~

Three Months Ended
September 30, Nine Months Ended
September 30,
2021 2020 2021 2020
Numerator:
Net loss $ (44,705) $ (16,216) $ (108,479) $ (36,114)
Accretion and cumulative dividends on redeemable convertible preferred stock — (3,943) — (8,046)
Gain on repurchase of redeemable convertible preferred stock — — — 493
Net loss attributable to common stockholders $ (44,705) $ (20,159) $ (108,479) $ (43,667)
Denominator:
Weighted average common shares outstanding, basic and diluted 44,714,941 1,665,902 41,608,017 1,645,982
Net loss per share attributable to common stockholders, basic and diluted $ (1.00) $ (12.10) $ (2.61) $ (26.53)

The following potential shares of common stock, presented based on amounts outstanding at each period end, were excluded from the calculation of diluted net loss per share ~~attributable to common stockholders~~ for the periods indicated because including them would have been anti-dilutive:

Three Months Ended
September 30, Nine Months Ended
September 30,
2021 2020 2021 2020
Outstanding stock options 6,414,070 5,814,944 6,414,070 5,814,944
Unvested restricted common stock and restricted stock units 383,196 8,763 383,196 8,763
Series A redeemable convertible preferred stock — 3,773,820 — 3,773,820
Series B redeemable convertible preferred stock — 6,969,173 — 6,969,173
Series B-1 redeemable convertible preferred stock — 1,246,133 — 1,246,133
Series C redeemable convertible preferred stock — 3,992,463 — 3,992,463
Series C-1 redeemable convertible preferred stock — 9,086,388 — 9,086,388
6,797,266 30,891,684 6,797,266 30,891,684


	Three Months Ended June 30,		Six Months Ended June 30,
	2022	2021	2022	2021
Outstanding stock options	9,826,672	6,608,072	9,826,672	6,608,072
Unvested restricted stock units	856,287	340,563	856,287	340,563
Potential shares issuable under the 2020 ESPP	55,244	—	55,244	—
	10,738,203	6,948,635	10,738,203	6,948,635

The shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of the redeemable convertible preferred stock for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020 assumed automatic conversion in the event of a qualified public offering.

10. Related Party Transactions

On September 11, 2019, the Company entered into a Cooperation and License Agreement (the “License Agreement”) with RogCon Inc. (“RogCon”). Under the License Agreement, RogCon granted to the Company an exclusive, worldwide license under RogCon’s intellectual property to research, develop and commercialize products for the treatment of all forms of epilepsy and/or neurodevelopmental disorders in each case caused by any mutation of the SCN2A gene. Pursuant to the terms of the License Agreement, the Company will conduct, at its own cost and expense, the research and development activities assigned to it under the associated research plan. In addition, the Company is responsible for reimbursing RogCon for any costs associated with research and development activities RogCon performs at the request of the Company. One of the founders of RogCon became the Company’s General Counsel in June 2020. The Company continues to reimburse RogCon for its out-of-pocket costs incurred for activities performed under the License Agreement. Expenses incurred during all periods presented were not material. As of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2021,~~2022, the Company had accrued expenses of $0.3 million due to RogCon under the License Agreement.

11. Restructuring

In June 2022, the Company began a strategic realignment to focus resources on its Movement Disorders and Epilepsy franchises, which resulted in a reduction of the Company’s workforce.

The Company incurred $1.0 million of costs related to the realignment, of which $0.6 million has been recognized in research and development expenses and $0.4 million has been recognized in general and administrative expenses in the condensed consolidated statement of operations during the three and six months ended June 30, 2022. These costs relate to employee severance, benefits and related costs. The Company does not expect to incur any additional significant costs related to the strategic realignment.

As of June 30, 2022, $0.5 million of the $1.0 million costs were paid. The remaining $0.5 million of costs are included within accrued expenses on the condensed consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2022 and are expected to be disbursed during the period from July 1, 2022 through December 31, 2022.

12. Subsequent Events

The Company considers events or transactions that occur after the balance sheet date but prior to the issuance of the condensed consolidated financial statements to provide additional evidence for certain estimates or to identify matters that require additional disclosure. The Company has concluded that no subsequent events have occurred that require disclosure.

1513

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

You should read the following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations together with our condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes appearing elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and the audited financial information and the notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, which was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ~~or SEC,~~(the "SEC") on ~~March 17, 2021.~~February 28, 2022. Some of the information contained in this discussion and analysis or set forth elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, including information with respect to our plans and strategy for our business and related financing, includes forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. As a result of many factors, including those factors set forth in the “Risk Factors” section of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2020~~2021 and set forth in the "Risk Factors" section of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, our actual results could differ materially from the results described in or implied by the forward-looking statements contained in the following discussion and analysis.

Overview

We are a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company translating genetic insights into the development of therapies for central nervous system, or CNS, disorders characterized by neuronal excitation-inhibition imbalance. Normal brain function requires a delicate balance of excitation and inhibition in neuronal circuits, which, when dysregulated, ~~leads~~can lead to abnormal function and disease. We are applying insights from genetic epilepsies to ~~broader~~both rare and more prevalent neurological ~~and psychiatric~~ disorders, using our understanding of shared biological targets and circuits in the brain. We apply a deliberate and pragmatic precision approach, leveraging a suite of translational tools including novel transgenic and predictive translational animal models and electrophysiology markers, to enable an efficient path to proof-of-concept in patients. Through this approach, we have established a broad CNS portfolio with multiple programs, including ~~multiple disclosed programs~~product candidates across ~~CNS disorders, including depression, epilepsy,~~ movement disorders, epilepsy and ~~pain syndromes,~~psychiatric disorders, with three clinical-stage product candidates. We expect ~~multiple~~to announce topline results from the Phase 2b clinical trial ~~readouts from all three~~in essential tremor, or ET, for our lead clinical-stage movement disorder program, the initiation of two first-in-patient studies for our lead small molecule epilepsy program and our lead antisense oligonucleotide, or ASO, epilepsy program and the launch of an additional clinical development program this year. In addition, we have established a robust pipeline of preclinical-stage programs through internal research and in-licensing, including one of the largest portfolios of targeted epilepsy programs in the ~~next year and anticipate the launch of a new~~industry.

Within our Movement Disorders franchise, our lead clinical ~~development program in the next year. We intend to develop differentiated therapies that can deliver long-term benefits to human health by meaningfully impacting patients and society.~~

~~Our most advanced clinical program, PRAX-114,~~candidate, PRAX-944, is ~~an extrasynaptic GABAA receptor preferring positive allosteric modulator, or PAM,~~being developed for the treatment of ~~patients suffering~~ET and Parkinson's Disease, or PD. In May 2022, we reported positive topline results from ~~major depressive disorder, or MDD, and~~

~~for~~ the ~~treatment~~second cohort of ~~women with menopausal and mood symptoms. We completed a multi-cohort, three-part~~our Phase 2a ~~clinical~~ trial in Australia for PRAX-114, in which Parts A and C of the trial treated patients with MDD while Part B focused on patients with perimenopausal depression, or PMD. For all parts of the trial, PRAX-114 was generally well-tolerated. In Parts A and C, we observed marked improvements in depression scores in MDD patients within two weeks of treatment that were maintained throughout the treatment period. In Part B, we observed improvements in both menopausal and mood symptoms, with mean decreases from baseline at Day 15 of 60% in frequency of moderate-to-severe hot flashes, 68% in the total score of the Perimenopausal Depression Questionnaire, 47% in the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale total score, 65% in the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale total score, and 40% in the total score of the Symptoms of Depression Questionnaire, with values trending toward baseline following discontinuation of PRAX-114. We expect to disclose plans for the Phase 2b study in the fourth quarter of 2021.

~~Our second clinical program,~~evaluating PRAX-944 ~~is a potentially differentiated selective small molecule inhibitor of T-type calcium channels~~ for the treatment of ET. We are currently conducting a Phase 2a proof-of-concept, open-label trial in ET patients. Preliminary site data from six participants in the low dose cohort showed tremor reduction, which compares favorablyexpect to the standard of care agents and historical placebo response. Based on the observed safety profile in the healthy volunteer titration study and the safety and preliminary efficacy data in ET participants administered up to 40mg daily, we added a second cohort to the ongoing ET Phase 2a trial where patients will be titrated to a dose of up to 120mg/day of PRAX-944. We expect preliminary open-label safety, tolerability and efficacy datareport topline results from the ~~second dose cohort in the~~ Phase ~~2a trial~~2b placebo-controlled Essential1 Study for daytime treatment of ET in the fourth quarter of ~~2021, followed by~~2022. Following the positive Phase 2a topline ~~data~~results announced in May 2022, the ~~first half of 2022, which is expected to include data from the randomized withdrawal phase~~primary endpoint of the study. We also completed dosing in a two-part Phase 1 study to explore a faster titration regimen, which is designed to evaluate the safety, tolerability and PK of titrating PRAX-944 up to 120 mg in a 10-day regimen in participants aged 18 to 54 years (Part A) and 55 to 75 years (Part B). In addition, we initiated the PRAX-944 Phase 2b Essential1 Study ~~for treatment~~was revised to change from baseline to Day 56 on modified Activities of ETDaily Living and ~~expect topline results in the second half of 2022. The Essential1 Study is a placebo-controlled, dose-ranging clinical trial designed~~we plan to ~~evaluate the safety, tolerability and efficacy of PRAX-944 at 20, 60 or 120 mg per day.~~randomize approximately 130 participants. We ~~also~~ intend to initiate a Phase 2, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics, or PK, and efficacy of PRAX-944 as a non-dopaminergic treatment for the motor symptoms of ~~Parkinson’s disease~~PD in the ~~first~~second half of ~~2022.~~2022, and expect to report topline results in 2023.

Our most advanced rare disease product candidate and third clinical program, PRAX-562, is the first selective persistent sodium current blocker in development for the treatment of a broad range of rare, devastating CNS disorders, such as rare adult cephalgias and severe pediatric epilepsies. WeWithin our Epilepsy franchise, we completed ~~the dosing and safety follow-up period for the single ascending dose and multiple ascending dose cohorts up to 150 mg and 120 mg, respectively, in~~ a Phase 1, ~~healthy volunteer study. PRAX-562 was well-tolerated, with no clinically significant~~two-part, placebo controlled study evaluating the safety, ~~findings. In this study, we used auditory steady state response, or ASSR, as an exploratory electroencephalogram, or EEG, biomarker to determine the doses required to achieve pharmacological blockade~~tolerability, PK and pharmacodynamics of ~~persistent sodium current, which we believe is a potential indicator of efficacy in patients.~~our lead small molecule epilepsy candidate, PRAX-562. We observed dose-related changes and a reduction in ASSR of greater than 50% after 14 days with daily dosing, as compared to baseline. Based on the observed signal in the ASSR marker in the Phase 1 study, we have started dosing patients in the United States in a Phase 1, placebo-controlled, two-cohort EEG study to validate the observed signal, and we expect topline data in the first half of 2022. The study is intended to evaluate ASSR as a biomarker for the PRAX-562 program to further support selection of therapeutic dose levels in Phase 2 studies.

We intend to initiate the first proof-of-concept trial of PRAX-562 in patients with rare adult cephalgias, including Short-lasting Unilateral Neuralgiform headache attacks with Conjunctival injection and Tearing, Short-lasting Unilateral Neuralgiform headache with Autonomic symptoms, and Trigeminal Neuralgia in the fourth quarter of 2021. We also planare expecting to initiate a Phase 2, ~~trial for treatment of developmental epileptic encephalopathies, or DEEs,~~placebo-controlled study with PRAX-562 in the ~~first~~second half of ~~2022. The FDA has granted both rare pediatric disease and orphan drug designations for PRAX-562~~2022 for the treatment of ~~SCN2A~~rare pediatric Developmental and ~~SCN8A developmental epileptic encephalopathies,~~Epileptic Encephalopathies, or ~~SCN2A-DEE~~DEEs, and ~~SCN8A-DEE, respectively.~~

~~In addition~~expect to ~~our clinical programs, we have multiple disclosed preclinical and discovery product candidates~~report topline results in ~~development for severe genetic epilepsies and multiple undisclosed preclinical and discovery product candidates for a range of CNS disorders.~~mid-2023. Our most advanced preclinical stage ~~program~~product candidate within our Epilepsy franchise, PRAX-222, is ~~PRAX-222,~~ an ~~antisense oligonucleotide, or~~ ASO designed to decrease the expression levels of the protein encoded by the gene SCN2A in patients with gain-of-function ~~mutations in~~ SCN2A ~~causing developmental epileptic encephalopathy. We completed~~mutations.In April 2022, we announced that we received an email communication from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or FDA, that our Investigational New Drug, ~~enabling~~or IND, application for the first-in-patient study of PRAX-222 was place on clinical hold. In June 2022, we announced that additional communication from the FDA indicated that the IND could be cleared upon submission of additional documentation related to the completed 13-week non-human primate toxicology study supporting the starting dose proposed by us. We have submitted the requested documentation for ~~PRAX-222~~the 13-week non-human primate toxicology study and ~~plan~~will engage with the FDA on the study design as needed, upon completion of their review of these data. We expect to ~~initiate regulatory submissions in order to begin~~start a ~~Phase 1/2 trial for treatment of SCN2A-DEE~~first-in-patient study with PRAX-222 in the ~~first~~second half of 2022. ~~The FDA has granted both rare pediatric disease~~In addition, we expect to initiate a Phase 1 study with our preclinical candidate, PRAX-628, in the fourth quarter of 2022 and ~~orphan drug designations for PRAX-222 for the treatment~~subsequently initiate a Phase 2 study in focal epilepsy in 2023. Our disclosed preclinical pipeline also consists of ~~SCN2A-DEE. We have one disclosed~~ discovery ~~program~~programs in development for KCNT1 related epilepsy, three ASOs targeting SCN2A in patients with loss-of-function mutations, PCDH19 and SYNGAP1,

respectively, and two additional discovery programs for undisclosed targets in ~~March 2021~~movement disorders and epilepsy. We plan to advance ASO candidates, PRAX-080 for PCDH19 and PRAX-090 for SYNGAP1 into preclinical development in 2023.

Within Psychiatry, in June 2022, we ~~entered into an innovative research collaboration with The Florey Institute~~announced that the Phase 2/3 Aria Study, evaluating the efficacy and safety of ~~Neuroscience~~PRAX-114 for monotherapy treatment of major depressive disorder, or MDD, did not achieve statistical significance on the primary endpoint of change from baseline in the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale total score at Day 15, or on any secondary endpoints. As a result, we closed screening and ~~Mental Health~~enrollment in the Phase 2 Acapella Study which is evaluating the presence of a dose response signal for PRAX-114 in MDD at doses up to ~~develop three additional novel ASOs~~60 mg, and we intend to read out results from approximately 100 patients in the third quarter of 2022. We also stopped enrollment in the Phase 2 study evaluating PRAX-114 for the treatment of ~~patients with severe genetic epilepsies, including a novel approach targeting SCN2A loss-of-function mutations.~~post-traumatic stress disorder and discontinued the Phase 2 crossover study to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics and efficacy of daytime dosing of PRAX-114 for the treatment of ET.

We were incorporated in 2015 and commenced operations in 2016. Since inception, we have devoted substantially all of our resources to developing our preclinical and clinical product candidates, building our intellectual property, or IP, portfolio, business planning, raising capital and providing general and administrative support for these operations. We employ a “virtual” research and development model, relying heavily upon external consultants, collaborators and contract research organizations, or CROs, to conduct our preclinical and clinical activities. Since inception, we have financed our operations primarily with proceeds from the ~~issuances~~sale and issuance of ~~convertible debt, redeemable convertible preferred stock, and common stock from our initial public offering, or IPO, in October 2020 and follow-on public offering in May 2021.~~

On May 18, 2021, we completed a follow-on public offering in which we issued and sold 5,750,000 shares of our common stock at a public offering price of $18.25 per share, including 750,000 shares of common stock issued and sold pursuant to the underwriters' exercise, in full, of their option to purchase additional shares of common stock, for aggregate gross proceeds of $104.9 million. We received approximately $98.4 million in net proceeds after deducting discounts, commissions, and offering expenses payable by us.equity securities.

We are a development stage company and we have not generated any revenue from product sales, and do not expect to do so for several years, if at all. All of our ~~programs~~product candidates are still in preclinical and clinical development. Our ability to generate product revenue sufficient to achieve profitability will depend heavily on the successful development and eventual commercialization of one or more of our product candidates, if approved. We have incurred recurring operating losses since inception, including a net loss of ~~$108.5~~$128.9 million for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2021.~~2022. As of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2021,~~2022, we had an accumulated deficit of ~~$258.0~~$445.5 million. We expect to incur significant expenses and operating losses for the foreseeable future as we expand our research and development activities. In addition, our losses from operations may fluctuate significantly from quarter-to-quarter and year-to-year, depending on the timing of our clinical trials and our expenditures on other research and

development activities. We anticipate that our expenses will ~~increase significantly~~be maintained or increased in connection with our ongoing activities, as we:

•advance our lead product ~~candidates, PRAX-114 and~~candidate, PRAX-944, to ~~and through~~a late stage clinical ~~trials;~~trial;

•advance our PRAX-562 product candidate to Phase 2 clinical trial;

•advance our PRAX-222 product candidate to clinical trials;

•advance our preclinical ~~programs~~candidates to clinical trials;

•further invest in our pipeline;

•further invest in our manufacturing capabilities;

•seek regulatory approval for our ~~investigational medicines;~~product candidates;

•maintain, expand, protect and defend our ~~intellectual property~~IP portfolio;

•acquire or in-license technology;

•~~secure facilities~~establish a sales, marketing and distribution infrastructure to ~~support continued growth in our research, development and commercialization efforts;~~commercialize any products for which we may obtain marketing approval;

•take precautionary measures to help minimize the risk of COVID-19 to our employees; and

•when needed, increase our headcount to support our development efforts and ~~to expand our clinical development team;~~

•~~incur additional costs and general and administrative headcount growth associated with our continued operations as a public company; and~~

•~~incur additional costs as a public company as we transition out of emerging growth company and smaller reporting company status at the end of 2021.~~any future commercialization efforts.

In addition, as we progress toward potential marketing approval for any of our product candidates, we expect to incur significant commercialization expenses related to product manufacturing, marketing, sales and distribution.

As a result, we will need substantial additional funding to support our continuing operations and pursue our growth strategy. Until such time as we can generate significant revenue from product sales, if ever, we expect to

finance our operations through the sale of equity, debt financings or other capital sources, including potential collaborations with other companies or other strategic transactions. We may be unable to raise additional funds or enter into such other agreements or arrangements when needed on favorable terms, or at all. If we fail to raise capital or enter into such agreements as, and when, needed, we may have to significantly delay, scale back or discontinue the development and commercialization of one or more of our product candidates or delay our pursuit of potential in-licenses or acquisitions.

Because of the numerous risks and uncertainties associated with ~~drug~~product development, we are unable to predict the timing or amount of increased expenses or when or if we will be able to achieve or maintain profitability. Even if we are able to generate product sales, we may not become profitable. If we fail to become profitable or are unable to sustain profitability on a continuing basis, then we may be unable to continue our operations at planned levels and be forced to reduce or terminate our operations.

As of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2021,~~2022, we had cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities of ~~$314.4~~$165.4 million. We believe that our ~~existing~~ cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities as of June 30, 2022 will enable us to fund our operating expenses and capital ~~expenditure requirements~~expenditures into the ~~second~~first quarter of ~~2023.~~2024. We have based this estimate on assumptions that may prove to be wrong, and we could exhaust our available capital resources sooner than we expect. See “—Liquidity and Capital Resources.”

Restructuring

In June 2022, we began a strategic realignment to focus resources on our Movement Disorders and Epilepsy franchises, which resulted in a reduction of our workforce.

We incurred $1.0 million of costs related to the realignment, of which $0.6 million has been recognized in research and development expenses and $0.4 million has been recognized in general and administrative expenses in the condensed consolidated statement of operations during the three and six months ended June 30, 2022. These costs relate to employee severance, benefits and related costs. We do not expect to incur any additional significant costs related to the strategic realignment.

COVID-19 Business Update

In light of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, we ~~have implemented business continuity plans designed~~continue to ~~address~~experience some disruptions and ~~mitigate~~increased risk in our operations and those third parties upon whom we rely. These include disruptions and risks related to the conduct of our clinical trials and preclinical studies as policies at various clinical sites and federal, state, local and foreign laws, rules and regulations continue to evolve, including quarantines, travel restrictions and redirection of healthcare resources toward pandemic response efforts. The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted the enrollment of some of our ongoing clinical trials, including slower patient enrollment and treatment in some of our clinical studies, the impact of ~~the COVID-19 pandemic on~~which has varied by clinical study and program, but none of which have significantly impacted our ~~employees and our business, including our preclinical studies and~~overall clinical ~~trials. We are continuing to operate during this period and have taken measures to secure our research and development activities.~~trial timelines. While we ~~are experiencing~~have experienced limited financial impacts ~~at this time,~~to date, given the global economic slowdown, the overall disruption of global healthcare systems and the other risks and uncertainties associated with the pandemic such as increased inflation, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be

materially adversely affected. We continue to closely monitor the COVID-19 pandemic as we evolve our business continuity plans, clinical development plans and response strategy.

In addition, while we have taken and are continuing to take steps to mitigate against possible delays, our planned clinical trials may be affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, including (i) delays or difficulties in enrolling and retaining patients in our planned clinical trials, including patients that may not be able or willing to comply with clinical trial protocols if quarantines impede patient movement or interrupt healthcare services; (ii) delays or difficulties in clinical site initiation, including difficulties in recruiting and retaining clinical site investigators and clinical site staff; (iii) diversion or prioritization of healthcare resources away from the conduct of clinical trials and towards the COVID-19 pandemic, including the diversion of hospitals serving as our clinical trial sites and hospital staff supporting the conduct of our clinical trials, and because, who, as healthcare providers, may have heightened exposure to COVID-19 and adversely impact our clinical trial operations; (iv) interruption of our future clinical supply chain or key clinical trial activities, such as clinical trial site monitoring, due to limitations on travel imposed or recommended by federal, state/provincial or municipal governments, employers and others; and (v) limitations in outsourced third-party resources that would otherwise be focused on the conduct of our planned clinical trials, including because of sickness of third-party personnel or their families, or the desire of third-party personnel to avoid contact with large groups of people.

Financial Operations Overview

Revenue

We have not generated any revenue since inception and do not expect to generate any revenue from the sale of products for several years, if at all. If our development efforts for our current or future product candidates are successful and result in marketing approval or collaboration or license agreements with third parties, we may generate revenue in the future from a combination of product sales or payments from such collaboration or license ~~agreements that we may enter into with third parties.~~agreements.

Operating Expenses

Research and Development ~~Expenses~~Expense

The nature of our business and primary focus of our activities generate a significant amount of research and development costs. Research and development expenses represent costs incurred by us for the following:

•costs to develop our portfolio;

•discovery efforts leading to development candidates;

•clinical development costs for our ~~programs;~~product candidates; and

•costs to develop our manufacturing technology and infrastructure.

The costs above comprise the following categories:

•personnel-related expenses, including salaries, benefits and stock-based compensation expense;

•expenses incurred under agreements with third parties, such as consultants, investigative sites and ~~contract research organizations,~~CROs, that conduct our preclinical and clinical studies and in-licensing arrangements;

•costs incurred to maintain compliance with regulatory requirements;

•costs incurred with third-party contract development and manufacturing organizations to acquire, develop and manufacture materials for preclinical and clinical studies; and

•depreciation, amortization and other direct and allocated expenses, including rent ~~insurance~~ and other operating costs, incurred as a result of our research and development activities.

We expense research and development costs as incurred. We recognize external development costs based on an evaluation of the progress to completion of specific tasks using information provided to us by our vendors and our clinical investigative sites. Payments for these activities are based on the terms of the individual agreements, which may differ from the pattern of costs incurred, and are reflected in our consolidated balance sheets as prepaid

expenses or accrued ~~research and development~~ expenses. Non-refundable advance payments for goods or services to be received in the future for use in research and development activities are deferred and capitalized, even when there is no alternative future use for the research and development. The capitalized amounts are expensed as the related goods are delivered or the services are performed.

AAs a company operating in a virtual environment, a significant portion of our research and development costs have been external costs. We track direct external research and development expenses to specific ~~programs~~franchises and product candidates upon commencement. Due to the number of ongoing ~~programs~~studies and our ability to use resources across several projects, indirect or shared operating costs incurred for our research and development ~~programs,~~franchises, such as personnel, facility costs and certain consulting costs, are not recorded or maintained on a ~~program-specific~~franchise-specific basis.

Our major programs, PRAX-114, PRAX-944 and PRAX-562, are those for which we have initiated clinical activities. Our discovery-stage programs are those which are at an earlier point in the development process. The following table reflects our research and development expenses, including direct ~~program-specific~~ expenses summarized by major ~~program, discovery-stage program costs~~franchise and other exploratory CNS indications and indirect or shared operating costs recognized as research and development expenses during each period presented (in thousands):

Three Months Ended
September 30, Nine Months Ended
September 30,
2021 2020 2021 2020
PRAX-114 $ 8,776 $ 4,077 $ 18,567 $ 9,137
PRAX-944 5,682 1,707 10,015 3,284
PRAX-562 3,104 885 9,256 2,527
Discovery-stage programs 5,099 2,154 12,689 4,050
Personnel-related (including stock-based compensation) 8,334 3,098 21,584 7,443
Other indirect research and development expenses 2,144 865 4,635 2,263
Total research and development expenses $ 33,139 $ 12,786 $ 76,746 $ 28,704


	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2022		2021		2022		2021
Psychiatry	$	11,314	$	6,640	$	25,752	$	9,841
Epilepsy	10,685		5,839		24,949		10,765
Movement disorders	8,411		3,795		17,515		5,372
Other exploratory CNS indications	248		819		2,439		1,482
Personnel-related (including stock-based compensation)	10,735		6,745		21,876		13,250
Other indirect research and development expenses	2,227		1,840		3,741		2,897
Total research and development expenses	$	43,620	$	25,678	$	96,272	$	43,607

Research and development activities are central to our business model. Product candidates in later stages of clinical development generally have higher development costs than those in earlier stages of clinical development,

primarily due to the increased size and duration of later-stage clinical trials. We expect that our research and development expenses will ~~continue to~~be maintained or increase in the foreseeable future as we advance our product candidates through the development phase, and as we continue to discover and develop additional product candidates, build manufacturing capabilities and expand into additional therapeutic areas.

At this time, we cannot reasonably estimate or know the nature, timing and estimated costs of the efforts that will be necessary to complete the development of, and obtain regulatory approval for, any of our product candidates. We are also unable to predict when, if ever, material net cash inflows will commence from sales or licensing of our product candidates. This is due to the numerous risks and uncertainties associated with drug development, including the uncertainty of:

•our ability to add and retain key research and development personnel;

•the timing and progress of preclinical and clinical development activities;

•the number and scope of preclinical and clinical programs we decide to pursue;

•our ability to successfully complete clinical trials with safety, tolerability and efficacy profiles that are satisfactory to the ~~U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or~~ FDA or any comparable foreign regulatory authority;

•our ability to successfully develop, obtain regulatory approval for, and then successfully commercialize, our product candidates;

•our successful enrollment in and completion of clinical trials;

•the costs associated with the development of any additional product candidates we identify in-house or acquire through collaborations;

•our ability to discover, develop and utilize biomarkers to demonstrate target engagement, pathway engagement and the impact on disease progression of our product candidates;

•our ability to establish and maintain agreements with third-party manufacturers for clinical supply for our clinical trials and commercial manufacturing, if our product candidates are approved;

•the terms and timing of any collaboration, license or other arrangement, including the terms and timing of any milestone payments thereunder;

•our ability to obtain and maintain patent, trade secret and other ~~intellectual property~~IP protection and regulatory exclusivity for our product candidates, if ~~and when~~ approved;

•our receipt of marketing approvals from applicable regulatory authorities;

•our ability to commercialize products, if ~~and when~~ approved, whether alone or in collaboration with others; and

•the continued acceptable safety profiles of the product candidates following approval.

A change in any of these variables with respect to the development of any of our product candidates would significantly change the costs, timing and viability associated with the development of that product candidate. For example, if the FDA or another regulatory authority were to delay our planned start of clinical trials or require us to conduct clinical trials or other testing beyond those that we currently expect, or if we experience significant delays in enrollment in any of our planned clinical trials, we could be required to expend significant additional financial resources and time to complete our clinical development activities. We may never obtain regulatory approval for any of our product candidates. Drug commercialization will take several years and ~~millions of dollars in~~require significant development costs.

General and Administrative ~~Expenses~~Expense

General and administrative expenses consist primarily of personnel-related costs, including salaries, benefits and stock-based compensation, for personnel in our executive, finance, legal, commercial and administrative functions. General and administrative expenses also include legal fees relating to corporate matters; professional fees for accounting, auditing, tax and administrative consulting services; commercial-related costs to support market assessments and scenario planning; insurance costs; administrative travel expenses; and facility-related expenses, which include direct depreciation costs and allocated expenses for office rent and other operating costs. ~~These costs relate to the operation of the business, unrelated to the research and development function, or any individual program.~~ Costs to secure and defend our ~~intellectual property, or~~ IP are expensed as incurred and are classified as general and administrative expenses.

These costs relate to the operation of the business and are unrelated to the research and development function or any individual franchise or product candidate.

We anticipate that our general and administrative expenses ~~will~~may increase in the future as we increase our headcount, when needed, to support the expected growth in our research and development activities and the potential commercialization of our product candidates. We also expect to incur increased expenses associated with being a public company, particularly when we are no longer an emerging growth company or a smaller company, including increased costs of accounting, audit, legal, regulatory and tax-related services associated with maintaining compliance with exchange listing and SEC requirements, director and officer insurance costs and investor and public relations costs. We also expect to incur additional IP-related expenses as we file patent applications to protect innovations arising from our research and development activities.

Other Income

Other Income, Net

Other income, net consists of interest income from our cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities and amortization of investment premiums and discounts.

Income Taxes

Since our inception, we have not recorded any U.S. federal or state income tax benefits for the net losses we have incurred in each year or for our earned research and development tax credits due to our uncertainty of realizing a benefit from those items. Income taxes are determined at the applicable tax rates adjusted for non-deductible expenses, research and development tax credits and other permanent differences. Our income tax provision may be significantly affected by changes to our estimates. The income tax benefit (provision) for the three and ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2021~~2022 and ~~2020~~2021 was not material.

Results of Operations

Comparison of the Three Months Ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2021~~2022 and ~~2020~~2021

The following table summarizes our consolidated statements of operations for each period presented (in thousands):


		Three Months Ended September 30,				Change			Three Months Ended June 30,				Change
		2021		2020					2022		2021
Operating expenses:	Operating expenses:							Operating expenses:
Research and development	Research and development	$	33,139	$	12,786	$	20,353	Research and development	$	43,620	$	25,678	$	17,942
General and administrative	General and administrative	11,634		3,431		8,203		General and administrative	16,774		10,805		5,969
Total operating expenses	Total operating expenses	44,773		16,217		28,556		Total operating expenses	60,394		36,483		23,911
Loss from operations	Loss from operations	(44,773)		(16,217)		(28,556)		Loss from operations	(60,394)		(36,483)		(23,911)
Total other income:
Other income:								Other income:
Other income, net	Other income, net	73		1		72		Other income, net	200		82		118
Total other income	Total other income	73		1		72		Total other income	200		82		118
Loss before income taxes		(44,700)		(16,216)		(28,484)
Provision for income taxes		(5)		—		(5)
Net loss	Net loss	$	(44,705)	$	(16,216)	$	(28,489)	Net loss	$	(60,194)	$	(36,401)	$	(23,793)

Research and Development Expense

The following table summarizes our research and development expenses for each period presented, along with the changes in those items (in thousands):

Three Months Ended
September 30, Change
2021 2020
PRAX-114 $ 8,776 $ 4,077 $ 4,699
PRAX-944 5,682 1,707 3,975
PRAX-562 3,104 885 2,219
Discovery-stage programs 5,099 2,154 2,945
Personnel-related (including stock-based compensation) 8,334 3,098 5,236
Other indirect research and development expenses 2,144 865 1,279
Total research and development expenses $ 33,139 $ 12,786 $ 20,353


	Three Months Ended June 30,				Change
	2022		2021
Psychiatry	$	11,314	$	6,640	$	4,674
Epilepsy	10,685		5,839		4,846
Movement disorders	8,411		3,795		4,616
Other exploratory CNS indications	248		819		(571)
Personnel-related (including stock-based compensation)	10,735		6,745		3,990
Other indirect research and development expenses	2,227		1,840		387
Total research and development expenses	$	43,620	$	25,678	$	17,942

~~Research and development expenses increased approximately $20.4~~

The $17.9 million ~~from approximately $12.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2020 to $33.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2021. The~~ increase in research and development expenses was primarily attributable to the following:

•$~~5.2~~4.8 million increase in ~~personnel-related costs due~~expense related to ~~increased headcount, including~~our epilepsy franchise, driven primarily by an increase in clinical-related spend for our PRAX-562 Phase 1 clinical trial, an increase in preclinical activities for our earlier stage assets and an increase in clinical-related spend to support the initiation of ~~$2.4 million in stock-based compensation expense;~~our anticipated PRAX-222 seamless clinical trial and our PRAX-562 Phase 2 DEEs clinical trial;

•$4.7 million increase in expense related to our ~~PRAX-114 program,~~psychiatry franchise, driven primarily by an increase in clinical-related ~~and toxicology~~ spend for our PRAX-114 Phase ~~2/3~~2 Acapella clinical trial which was initiated in the second quarter of 2021 and our Phase 2 placebo-controlled study evaluating PRAX-114 for ~~this program;~~the treatment of PTSD which was initiated in the fourth quarter of 2021;

•

$4.6 million increase in expense related to our movement disorders franchise, driven primarily by an increase in clinical-related spend for our PRAX-944 Phase 2 Essential1 clinical trial; and

•$4.0 million increase in ~~expense related to our PRAX-944 program, driven primarily by an increase in toxicology and clinical-related spend;~~

•~~$2.9 million increase in expense related to our discovery-stage programs, primarily driven by an increase in preclinical activities for such programs;~~

•~~$2.2 million increase in expense related to our PRAX-562 program, primarily driven by an increase in spend to support our upcoming clinical trails; and~~

•~~$1.3 million increase in other indirect research and development expenses, driven by an increase in facility and other allocated overhead~~personnel-related costs ~~primarily attributable~~due to increased ~~research and development headcount and our new office location, as well as an increase in technology spend.~~headcount.

General and Administrative Expense

~~General and administrative expenses increased $8.2~~The $6.0 million ~~from $3.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2020 to $11.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2021. The~~ increase in general and administrative expenses was primarily attributable to the following:

•$~~4.7~~3.4 million increase in personnel-related costs ~~primarily driven by~~due to increased ~~headcount, including an increase of $3.2 million in stock-based compensation expense;~~

•$1.8 million increase in professional fees, including $1.0 million of increased commercial-related spend to support assessments of our clinical-stage programs, a $0.3 million increase in general and administrative infrastructure costs and a $0.3 million increase in audit and legal fees;headcount; and

•$~~1.7~~2.6 million increase in other general and administrative expenses, ~~including a $1.1 million increase in insurance and related costs, primarily due to becoming a public company, and a $0.2 million increase in technology related costs.~~none of which were individually significant.

Other Income

Other income for the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, 2022 and 2021 ~~and 2020,~~was comprised of interest income on our cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities and investment premium and discount ~~amortization, was not material.~~amortization.

Comparison of the ~~Nine~~Six Months Ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2021~~2022 and ~~2020~~2021

The following table summarizes our consolidated statements of operations for each period presented (in thousands):

Nine Months Ended
September 30, Change
2021 2020
Operating expenses:
Research and development $ 76,746 $ 28,704 $ 48,042
General and administrative 31,929 7,552 24,377
Total operating expenses 108,675 36,256 72,419
Loss from operations (108,675) (36,256) (72,419)
Total other income:
Other income, net 201 134 67
Total other income 201 134 67
Loss before income taxes (108,474) (36,122) (72,352)
Benefit from (provision for) income taxes (5) 8 (13)
Net loss $ (108,479) $ (36,114) $ (72,365)


	Six Months Ended June 30,				Change
	2022		2021
Operating expenses:
Research and development	$	96,272	$	43,607	$	52,665
General and administrative	32,971		20,295		12,676
Total operating expenses	129,243		63,902		65,341
Loss from operations	(129,243)		(63,902)		(65,341)
Other income:
Other income, net	332		128		204
Total other income	332		128		204
Net loss	$	(128,911)	$	(63,774)	$	(65,137)

Research and Development Expense

The following table summarizes our research and development expenses for each period presented, along with the changes in those items (in thousands):

Nine Months Ended
September 30, Change
2021 2020
PRAX-114 $ 18,567 $ 9,137 $ 9,430
PRAX-944 10,015 3,284 6,731
PRAX-562 9,256 2,527 6,729
Discovery-stage programs 12,689 4,050 8,639
Personnel-related (including stock-based compensation) 21,584 7,443 14,141
Other indirect research and development expenses 4,635 2,263 2,372
Total research and development expenses $ 76,746 $ 28,704 $ 48,042

~~Research and development expenses increased approximately $48.0~~


	Six Months Ended June 30,				Change
	2022		2021
Psychiatry	$	25,752	$	9,841	$	15,911
Epilepsy	24,949		10,765		14,184
Movement disorders	17,515		5,372		12,143
Other exploratory CNS indications	2,439		1,482		957
Personnel-related (including stock-based compensation)	21,876		13,250		8,626
Other indirect research and development expenses	3,741		2,897		844
Total research and development expenses	$	96,272	$	43,607	$	52,665

The $52.7 million ~~from $28.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2020 to $76.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2021. The~~ increase in research and development expenses was primarily attributable to the following:

•$~~14.1 million increase in personnel-related costs primarily due to increased headcount, including an increase of $6.5 million in stock-based compensation expense;~~

•~~$9.4~~15.9 million increase in expense related to our ~~PRAX-114 program,~~psychiatry franchise, driven primarily by an increase in ~~toxicology and~~ clinical-related spend for our PRAX-114 Phase 2/3 Aria and Phase 2 Acapella clinical trials which were initiated in the first quarter and second quarter of 2021, respectively;

•$14.2 million increase in expense related to our epilepsy franchise, driven primarily by an increase in clinical-related spend to support the initiation of our anticipated PRAX-222 seamless clinical trial and our PRAX-562 Phase 2 developmental epileptic encephalopathies clinical trial, an increase in clinical-related spend for ~~this program;~~our PRAX-562 Phase 1 clinical trial, an increase in preclinical activities for our earlier stage assets, and the payment of a $2.0 million license fee to Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. in January of 2022 upon exercise of our exclusive option to obtain the rights and license to further develop and commercialize PRAX-222;

•$12.1 million increase in expense related to our movement disorders franchise, driven primarily by an increase in clinical-related spend for our PRAX-944 Phase 2 Essential1 clinical trial; and

•$8.6 million increase in ~~expense related to our discovery-stage programs, primarily driven by an increase in preclinical activities for such programs;~~

•~~$6.7 million increase in expense related to our PRAX-944 program, driven primarily by an increase in toxicology and clinical-related spend;~~

•~~$6.7 million increase in expense related to our PRAX-562 program, primarily driven by an increase in toxicology and clinical-related spend; and~~

•~~$2.4 million increase in other indirect research and development expenses, driven by an increase in facility and other allocated overhead~~personnel-related costs ~~primarily attributable~~due to increased ~~research and development headcount, as well as an increase in technology spend.~~headcount.

General and Administrative Expense

~~General and administrative expenses increased approximately $24.4~~The $12.7 million ~~from $7.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2020 to $31.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2021. The~~ increase in general and administrative expenses was primarily attributable to the following:

•$~~13.1~~8.4 million increase in personnel-related costs ~~primarily driven by~~due to increased ~~headcount, including an increase of $8.7 million in stock-based compensation expense;~~headcount; and

•$~~6.3~~3.6 million increase in professional fees, including ~~$3.5 million of increased commercial-related spend to support assessments of our clinical-stage programs,~~ a ~~$1.1~~$1.4 million increase in ~~audit and~~ legal fees ~~and a $0.9 million increase in general and administrative infrastructure costs; and~~

•~~$4.9 million increase in other general and administrative expenses, including a $3.2 million increase in insurance and related costs~~ due to ~~becoming a public company, a $0.7 million increase in donations~~increased corporate activity and ~~sponsorships and a $0.5 million increase in technology spend.~~patent-related work.

Other Income

Other income for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, 2022 and 2021, ~~and 2020,~~was comprised of interest income on our cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities and investment premium and discount ~~amortization, was not material.~~amortization.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Sources of Liquidity

Since our inception, we have incurred significant losses in each period. We have not yet commercialized any of our product candidates, which are in various phases of preclinical and clinical development, and we do not expect to generate revenue from sales of any products for several years, if at all.

To date, we have financed our operations primarily with proceeds from the ~~sale and~~ issuance of ~~our~~ redeemable convertible preferred stock and from the sale ~~and issuance of convertible debt, and the sale and issuance~~ of common stock ~~in our IPO and~~through an initial public offering, a follow-on public ~~offering.~~offering and at-the-market offerings under our shelf registration statement. From inception through ~~September~~June 30, ~~2021,~~2022, we have raised ~~$509.4~~$517.8 million in aggregate cash proceeds from ~~these~~such transactions, net of issuance costs. As of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2021,~~2022, we had cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities of ~~$314.4~~$165.4 million.

On November 3, 2021, we entered into an Open Market Sale Agreement, or the sales agreement, with Jefferies LLC, or Jefferies, to provide for the offering, issuance and sale of up to an aggregate amount of $125.0 million of common stock from time to time in at-the-market offerings for which Jefferies acts as sales agent. During the three months ended June 30, 2022, we did not sell any shares under the sales agreement. During the six

months ended June 30, 2022, we issued and sold 70,410 shares under the sales agreement for aggregate net proceeds of $1.4 million. We have issued and sold a total of 462,407 shares under the sales agreement for aggregate net proceeds of $8.4 million after deducting commissions and offering expenses payable by us.

Historical Cash Flows

The following table provides information regarding our cash flows for each period presented (in thousands):


		Nine Months Ended September 30,					Six Months Ended June 30,
		2021		2020			2022		2021
Net cash (used in) provided by:	Net cash (used in) provided by:					Net cash (used in) provided by:
Operating activities	Operating activities	$	(79,697)	$	(32,395)	Operating activities	$	(111,318)	$	(55,735)
Investing activities	Investing activities	(150,689)		—		Investing activities	26,340		(164,239)
Financing activities	Financing activities	99,873		102,352		Financing activities	1,713		99,661
Net (decrease) increase in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash		$	(130,513)	$	69,957
Net decrease in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash						Net decrease in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash	$	(83,265)	$	(120,313)

Operating Activities

Our cash flows from operating activities are greatly influenced by our use of cash for operating expenses and working capital requirements to support our business. We have historically experienced negative cash flows from operating activities as we have invested in developing our portfolio, drug discovery efforts and related infrastructure. The cash used in operating activities resulted primarily from our net losses adjusted for non-cash charges and changes in ~~components of working capital,~~operating assets and liabilities, which are primarily the result of increased expenses and timing of vendor payments.

During the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, 2022, net cash used in operating activities of $111.3 million was primarily due to our $128.9 million net loss, partially offset by $16.7 million of non-cash charges primarily related to stock-based compensation and $0.9 million in changes in operating assets and liabilities primarily related to an increase in accounts payable and a decrease in prepaid expenses and other current assets.

During the six months ended June 30, 2021, net cash used in operating activities of ~~$79.7~~$55.7 million was primarily due to our ~~$108.5~~$63.8 million net loss ~~partially offset by $9.7~~and $3.4 million in changes in operating assets and liabilities primarily related to a decrease in accrued expenses and ~~$19.1~~an increase in prepaid expenses and other current assets, partially offset by $11.4 million of non-cash charges primarily related to stock-based compensation.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2020, net cash used in operating activities of $32.4 million was primarily due to our $36.1 million net loss, partially offset by $1.8 million in changes in operating assets and liabilities and $1.9 million of non-cash charges.

Investing Activities

During the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, 2022, net cash provided by investing activities of $26.3 million was primarily related to maturities of marketable securities, partially offset by purchases of marketable securities.

During the six months ended June 30, 2021, net cash used in investing activities of ~~$150.7~~$164.2 million was primarily related to the purchase of marketable ~~securities, partially offset by the maturities of marketable~~ securities. ~~There were no cash flows from investing activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2020.~~

Financing Activities

During the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, 2022, net cash provided by financing activities of $1.7 million consisted of net proceeds from at-the-market offerings of $1.4 million and proceeds from purchases of common stock under our employee stock purchase plan and from the exercise of stock options, partially offset by the payment of issuance costs for our at-the-market offerings and the payment of taxes related to the vesting of restricted stock units.

During the six months ended June 30, 2021, net cash provided by financing activities of ~~$99.9~~$99.7 million consisted of net proceeds from our follow-on public offering of ~~$98.5~~$98.6 million and net proceeds from the exercise of stock options, ~~of $2.0 million,~~ partially offset by the payment of issuance costs for our ~~IPO.~~

During the nine months ended September 30, 2020, net cash provided by financing activities of $102.4 million consisted of proceeds from the issuance of Series C-1 redeemable convertible preferred stock and exercise of stock options, partially offset by cash paid for the repurchase of our Series C redeemable convertible preferred stock and payment of issuance costs.initial public offering..

Plan of Operation and Future Funding Requirements

We expect our expenses to increase substantially in connection with our ongoing research and development activities, particularly as we advance the preclinical activities and clinical trials of our product candidates. ~~In addition, we expect to incur additional costs associated with operating as a public company and as we transition from being an emerging growth company and a smaller reporting company.~~ As a result, we expect to incur substantial operating losses and negative operating cash flows for the foreseeable future. We anticipate that our expenses will increase substantially if and as we:

•advance the clinical development of our ~~PRAX-114, PRAX-944~~clinical-stage product candidates within our movement disorders and ~~PRAX-562 product candidates;~~epilepsy franchises;

•advance the development of any additional product candidates;

•conduct research and continue preclinical development of potential product candidates;

•make strategic investments in manufacturing capabilities;

•maintain our ~~current intellectual property~~IP portfolio and opportunistically acquire complementary ~~intellectual property;~~IP;

•seek to obtain regulatory approvals for our product candidates;

•potentially establish a sales, marketing and distribution infrastructure and scale-up manufacturing capabilities to commercialize any products for which we may obtain regulatory approval;

•when needed, add clinical, scientific, operational, financial and management information systems and personnel, including personnel to support our product development and potential future commercialization efforts and to support our operations as a public company; and

•experience any delays or encounter any issues with any of the above, including but not limited to failed studies, complex results, safety issues or other regulatory challenges.

In June 2022, following the Aria Study topline results, we announced a strategic realignment to focus resources on our Movement Disorders and Epilepsy franchises, which resulted in a reduction of our workforce and future operating expenses and extended our cash runway.

We are unable to estimate the exact amount of our working capital requirements, but based on our current operating plan, we believe that our ~~existing~~ cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities as of June 30, 2022 will enable us to fund our operating expenses and capital expenditure requirements into the ~~second~~first quarter of ~~2023.~~2024. However, we have based this estimate on assumptions that may prove to be wrong and we could exhaust our capital resources sooner than we expect.

Because of the numerous risks and uncertainties associated with product development and ~~because the extent to which we may enter into~~potential collaborations with third parties for the development of our product candidates, ~~is unknown,~~ we may incorrectly estimate the timing and amounts of increased capital outlays and operating expenses associated with completing the research and development of our product candidates. Our funding requirements and timing and amount of our operating expenditures will depend on many factors, including, but not limited to:

•the scope, progress, results and costs of preclinical studies and clinical trials for our ~~programs~~franchises and product candidates;

•the number and characteristics of ~~programs~~product candidates and technologies that we develop or may in-license;

•the costs and timing of future commercialization activities, including manufacturing, marketing, sales and distribution, for any of our product candidates for which we receive marketing approval;

•the costs necessary to obtain regulatory approvals, if any, for products in the United States and other jurisdictions, and the costs of post-marketing studies that could be required by regulatory authorities in jurisdictions where approval is obtained;

•the costs and timing of preparing, filing and prosecuting patent applications, maintaining and enforcing our ~~intellectual property~~IP rights and defending any ~~intellectual property-related~~IP-related claims;

•the continuation of our existing licensing arrangements and entry into new collaborations and licensing arrangements;

•the costs we incur in maintaining business operations;

•the costs associated with being a public company;

•the revenue, if any, received from commercial sales of any product candidates for which we receive marketing approval;

•the effect of competing technological and market developments;

•the impact of any business interruptions to our operations or to those of our manufacturers, suppliers or other vendors resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic or similar public health crisis; and

•the extent to which we acquire or invest in businesses, products and technologies, including entering into licensing or collaboration arrangements for product candidates, although we currently have no commitments or agreements to complete any such acquisitions or investments in businesses.

Identifying potential product candidates and conducting preclinical testing and clinical trials is a time consuming, expensive and uncertain process that takes years to complete, and we may never generate the necessary data or results required to obtain marketing approval and achieve product sales. In addition, our product candidates, if approved, may not achieve commercial success. Our commercial revenues, if any, will be derived from sales of products that we do not expect to be commercially available for many years, if ever. Accordingly, we will need to obtain substantial additional funds to achieve our business objectives.

Adequate additional funds may not be available to us on acceptable terms, or at all. We do not currently have any committed external source of funds. Market volatility resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic or other factors could also adversely impact our ability to access capital as and when needed. To the extent that we raise additional capital through the sale of equity or convertible debt securities, the ownership interest of our existing stockholders will be diluted, and the terms of these securities may include liquidation or other preferences that adversely affect the rights of holders of our common stock. Additional debt financing and preferred equity financing, if available, may involve agreements that include covenants limiting or restricting our ability to take specific actions, such as incurring additional debt, making capital expenditures or declaring dividends and may require the issuance of warrants, which could potentially result in dilution to the holders of our common stock.

If we raise additional funds through collaborations, strategic alliances or licensing arrangements with third parties, we may have to relinquish valuable rights to our technologies, future revenue streams, research programs or product candidates or grant licenses on terms that may not be favorable to us. If we are unable to raise additional funds through equity or debt financings when needed, we may be required to delay, limit or terminate our product development programs or any future commercialization efforts or grant rights to develop and market product candidates to third parties that we would otherwise prefer to develop and market ourselves.

~~Contractual Obligations~~

As of September 30, 2021, there have been no significant changes to our contractual obligations from those described under the heading “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Contractual Obligations and Commitments” included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 17, 2021, other than our new sublease agreement entered into in May 2021 for office space in Boston, Massachusetts. The space is being used as our new corporate headquarters as of October 1, 2021 and the sublease expires on January 31, 2026, with no option to renew or terminate early. The base rent increases by 2% annually. Starting in January 2022, we are obligated to pay $5.2 million in total future lease payments over the remaining term of the lease.

~~Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements~~

~~We did not have during the periods presented, and we do not currently have, any off-balance sheet arrangements, as defined in the rules and regulations of the SEC.~~

Critical Accounting Policies and Significant Judgments and Estimates

Our management’s discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is based on our condensed consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. The preparation of these condensed consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the condensed consolidated financial statements, as well as the reported expenses incurred during the reporting periods. Our estimates are based on our historical experience and on various other factors that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

There have been no changes to our critical accounting policies from those described under the heading “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Critical Accounting Policies and Significant Judgments and Estimates” included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on ~~March 17, 2021.~~February 28, 2022.

~~JOBS Act and Emerging Growth Company Status~~

In April 2012, the JOBS Act was enacted. As an emerging growth company, or EGC, under the JOBS Act, we may delay the adoption of certain accounting standards until such time as those standards apply to private companies. Other exemptions and reduced reporting requirements under the JOBS Act for EGCs include presentation of only two years of audited financial statements in a registration statement for an initial public offering, an exemption from the requirement to provide an auditor’s report on internal controls over financial reporting pursuant to Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, an exemption from any requirement that may be adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding mandatory audit firm rotation and less extensive disclosure about our executive compensation arrangements. Additionally, the JOBS Act provides that an EGC can take advantage of an extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards. This allows an EGC to delay the adoption of certain accounting standards until those standards would otherwise apply to private companies. We have elected to avail ourselves of the extended transition period and, therefore, while we are an EGC we will not be subject to new or revised accounting standards at the same time that they become applicable to other public companies that are not EGCs, unless we choose to early adopt a new or revised accounting standard.

~~We will remain an emerging growth company until December 31, 2021.~~

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

We have reviewed all recently issued standards and have determined that, other than as disclosed in Note 2 to our condensed consolidated financial statements appearing elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, such standards will not have a material impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements or do not otherwise apply to our current operations.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

~~Reserved.~~

2824

We are exposed to market risk related to changes in interest rates. Our primary exposure to market risk is interest rate sensitivity, which is affected by changes in the general level of U.S. interest rates, particularly because our cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities are or may be in the form of money market funds or marketable debt securities and are or may be invested in U.S. Treasury and U.S. government agency obligations. However, because of the short-term nature and low risk profile of the instruments in our portfolio, an immediate change in market interest rates of 100 basis points would not have a material impact on the fair market value of our investment portfolio or on our financial position or results of operations.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures.

Management’s Evaluation of Our Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain “disclosure controls and procedures,” as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended ~~or the Exchange Act,~~(the "Exchange Act") as controls and other procedures of an issuer that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the issuer in the reports that ~~we file~~it files or ~~submit~~submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the issuer in the reports that ~~we file~~it files or ~~submit~~submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to ~~our~~the issuer's management, including ~~our~~its principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Our management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives and our management necessarily applies its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.

Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, respectively), evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2021.~~2022. Based on the evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2021,~~2022, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of such date, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

2925

PART II—OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings.

As of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, we are not party to any material legal matters or claims. We may become party to legal matters and claims arising in the ordinary course of business. We cannot predict the outcome of any such legal matters or claims, and despite the potential outcomes, the existence thereof may have an adverse impact on us because of defense and settlement costs, diversion of management resources and other factors.

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

~~The risk factor set forth~~Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below ~~updates, and should be read~~together with all of the other information contained in ~~conjunction with, the risk factors previously disclosed in the section entitled "Risk Factors" of our Annual~~this Quarterly Report on Form ~~10-K~~10-Q, including our consolidated financial statements and the related notes appearing elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and in our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, before deciding to invest in our common stock. The risks described below are not the only risks facing our company. The occurrence of any of the following risks, or of additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently believe to be immaterial, could cause our business, prospects, operating results and financial condition to suffer materially. In such event, the trading price of our common stock could decline, and you might lose all or part of your investment.

Risks Related to Our Financial Position and Need for Additional Capital

Risks Related to Past Financial Condition

We are a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company and we have incurred significant losses since our inception. We anticipate that we will continue to incur significant losses for the foreseeable future.

Investment in biopharmaceutical product development is highly speculative because it entails substantial upfront capital expenditures and significant risk that any potential product candidate will fail to demonstrate adequate effect or an acceptable safety profile, gain regulatory approval and become commercially viable. We have no products approved for commercial sale and have not generated any revenue to date, and we will continue to incur significant research and development and other expenses related to our clinical development and ongoing operations. As a result, we are not profitable and have incurred losses in each period since our inception. Since our inception, we have devoted substantially all of our financial resources and efforts to research and development, including preclinical studies and our clinical trials. Our financial condition and operating results, including net losses, may fluctuate significantly from quarter to quarter and year to year. Accordingly, you should not rely upon the results of any quarterly or annual periods as indications of future operating performance. Additionally, net losses and negative cash flows have had, and will continue to have, an adverse effect on our stockholders’ equity and working capital. Our net losses were $128.9 million and $167.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2022 and the year ended December 31, ~~2020 filed~~2021, respectively. As of June 30, 2022, we had an accumulated deficit of $445.5 million. We expect to continue to incur significant losses for the foreseeable future, and we expect these losses to increase as we continue our research and development of and seek regulatory approvals for our product candidates in our initial and potential additional indications as well as for other product candidates.

We anticipate that our expenses will increase substantially if and as we:

•continue to develop and conduct clinical trials, including in expanded geographies such as Europe, for our product candidates;

•initiate and continue research and development, including preclinical, clinical and discovery efforts for any future product candidates;

•seek to identify additional product candidates;

•seek regulatory approvals for our product candidates that may successfully complete clinical development;

•add operational, financial and management information systems and personnel, including personnel to support our product candidate development and help us comply with our obligations as a public company;

•hire and retain additional personnel, such as clinical, quality control, scientific, commercial and administrative personnel;

•maintain, expand and protect our intellectual property portfolio;

•establish sales, marketing, distribution, manufacturing, supply chain and other commercial infrastructure in the future to commercialize various products for which we may obtain regulatory approval;

•add equipment and physical infrastructure to support our research and development; and

•acquire or in-license other product candidates and technologies.

Our expenses could increase beyond our expectations if we are required by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or the FDA, or other regulatory authorities to perform clinical trials in addition to those that we currently expect, or if there are any delays in establishing appropriate manufacturing arrangements for or in completing our clinical trials or the development of any of our product candidates.

Risks Related to Future Financial Condition

We will need substantial additional funding, and if we are unable to raise capital when needed, we could be forced to delay, reduce or eliminate our product discovery and development programs or commercialization efforts.

Our operations have consumed substantial amounts of cash since inception. We expect to continue to spend substantial amounts to continue the preclinical and clinical development of our current and future programs. If we are able to gain marketing approval for our product candidates, we will require significant additional amounts of cash in order to launch and commercialize such product candidates to the extent that such launch and commercialization are not the responsibility of a future collaborator that we may contract with in the future. In addition, other unanticipated costs may arise in the course of our development efforts. Because the design and outcome of our planned and anticipated clinical trials is highly uncertain, we cannot reasonably estimate the actual amounts necessary to successfully complete the development and commercialization of any product candidates we develop.

Our future capital requirements depend on many factors, including:

•the scope, progress, results and costs of researching and developing our current product candidates and other product candidates we may develop and pursue, including drug product manufacturing;

•the timing and uncertainty of, and the costs involved in, obtaining marketing approvals for our current product candidates, and other product candidates we may develop and pursue;

•the number of future product candidates that we may pursue and their development requirements;

•the number of jurisdictions in which we plan to seek regulatory approvals;

•if approved, the costs of commercialization activities for our product candidates for any approved indications, or any other product candidate that receives regulatory approval to the extent such costs are not the responsibility of any future collaborators, including the costs and timing of establishing product sales, marketing, distribution and manufacturing capabilities;

•subject to receipt of regulatory approval, revenue, if any, received from commercial sales of our product candidates for any approved indications or any other product candidates;

•the extent to which we in-license or acquire rights to other products, product candidates or technologies;

•our headcount growth and associated costs as we expand our research and development and establish a commercial infrastructure;

•the costs of preparing, filing and prosecuting patent applications and maintaining and protecting our intellectual property rights, including enforcing and defending intellectual property related claims; and

•the ongoing costs of operating as a public company.

We cannot be certain that additional funding will be available on acceptable terms, or at all. We have no committed source of additional capital and if we are unable to raise additional capital in sufficient amounts or on terms acceptable to us, we may have to significantly delay, scale back or discontinue the development or commercialization of our product candidates or other research and development initiatives. Any of our current or future license agreements may also be terminated if we are unable to meet the payment or other obligations under the agreements.

We believe that our cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities as of June 30, 2022 will enable us to fund our operating expenses and capital expenditure requirements into the first quarter of 2024. Our estimate may prove to be wrong, and we could use our available capital resources sooner than we currently expect. Further,

changing circumstances, some of which may be beyond our control, could cause us to consume capital significantly faster than we currently anticipate, and we may need to seek additional funds sooner than planned.

Raising additional capital may cause dilution to our stockholders, restrict our operations or require us to relinquish rights to our technologies or product candidates.

We expect our expenses to increase in connection with our planned operations. Unless and until we can generate a substantial amount of revenue from our product candidates, we expect to finance our future cash needs through public or private equity offerings, debt financings, collaborations, licensing arrangements or other sources, or any combination of the foregoing. In addition, we may seek additional capital due to favorable market conditions or strategic considerations, even if we believe that we have sufficient funds for our current or future operating plans.

To the extent that we raise additional capital through the sale of common stock, convertible securities or other equity securities, our existing stockholders' ownership interests may be diluted, and the terms of these securities could include liquidation or other preferences and anti-dilution protections that could adversely affect the rights of our stockholders. In addition, debt financing, if available, may result in fixed payment obligations and may involve agreements that include restrictive covenants that limit our ability to take specific actions, such as incurring additional debt, making capital expenditures, creating liens, redeeming stock or declaring dividends, that could adversely impact our ability to conduct our business. In addition, securing financing could require a substantial amount of time and attention from our management and may divert a disproportionate amount of their attention away from day-to-day activities, which may adversely affect our management’s ability to oversee the development of our product candidates.

If we raise additional funds through collaborations or marketing, distribution, licensing and royalty arrangements with third parties, we may have to relinquish valuable rights to our technologies, future revenue streams or product candidates or grant licenses on terms that may not be favorable to us. If we are unable to raise additional funds when needed, we may be required to delay, limit, reduce or terminate our product development or future commercialization efforts or grant rights to develop and market product candidates that we would otherwise prefer to develop and market ourselves.

We are a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company with a very limited operating history and no products approved for commercial sale, which may make it difficult to evaluate our current business and predict our future success and viability.

We are a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company, focused on translating genetic insights into the development of therapies for CNS disorders characterized by neuronal imbalance. We commenced operations in 2016, have no products approved for commercial sale and have not generated any revenue from product sales. Our operations have been focused on developing and conducting preclinical and clinical studies of our product candidates. To date, we have not initiated or completed a pivotal clinical trial, obtained marketing approval for any product candidates, manufactured a commercial scale product or arranged for a third party to do so on our behalf, or conducted sales and marketing activities necessary for successful product commercialization. Our limited operating history as a company makes any assessment of our future success and viability subject to significant uncertainty. We will encounter risks and difficulties frequently experienced by early-stage biopharmaceutical companies in rapidly evolving fields, and we have not yet demonstrated an ability to successfully overcome such risks and difficulties. If we do not address these risks and difficulties successfully, our business will suffer.

Drug development is a highly uncertain undertaking and involves a substantial degree of risk.

We have no products approved for commercial sale. To obtain revenues from the sales of our product candidates that are significant or large enough to achieve profitability, we must succeed, either alone or with third parties, in developing, obtaining regulatory approval for, manufacturing, and marketing our product candidates. Our ability to generate revenue and achieve profitability depends on many factors, including:

•initiating and successfully completing research and preclinical and clinical development of our product candidates;

•obtaining regulatory approvals and marketing authorizations for product candidates for which we successfully complete clinical development and clinical trials, if any;

•developing a sustainable and scalable manufacturing process for our product candidates, as well as establishing and maintaining commercially viable supply relationships with third parties that can provide adequate products and services to support clinical activities and commercial demand of our product candidates;

•identifying, assessing, acquiring and/or developing new product candidates;

•negotiating favorable terms in any collaboration, licensing or other arrangements into which we may enter;

•launching and successfully commercializing product candidates for which we obtain regulatory and marketing approval, if any, either by collaborating with a partner or, if launched independently, by establishing a sales, marketing and distribution infrastructure;

•obtaining and maintaining an adequate price for our product candidates in the countries where our products are commercialized, if any;

•obtaining adequate reimbursement for our product candidates from payors;

•obtaining market acceptance of our product candidates as viable treatment options;

•addressing any competing technological and market developments;

•receiving milestone and other payments under any future collaboration arrangements;

•maintaining, protecting, expanding and enforcing our portfolio of intellectual property rights, including patents, trade secrets and know-how; and

•attracting, hiring and retaining qualified personnel.

Because of the numerous risks and uncertainties associated with drug development, we are unable to predict the timing or amount of our expenses, or when we will be able to generate any meaningful revenue or achieve or maintain profitability, if ever. In addition, our expenses could increase beyond our current expectations if we are required by the FDA or foreign regulatory agencies to perform studies in addition to those that we currently anticipate, or if there are any delays in any of our or our future collaborators’ clinical trials or the development of any of our product candidates. Even if one or more of our product candidates is approved for commercial sale, we anticipate incurring significant costs associated with launching and commercializing any approved product candidate and ongoing compliance efforts.

We may expend our limited resources on programs that do not yield a successful product candidate or fail to capitalize on product candidates or indications that may be more profitable or for which there is a greater likelihood of success.

Due to the significant resources required for the development of our programs and product candidates, we must focus our programs and product candidates on specific diseases and disease pathways and decide which product candidates to pursue and advance and the amount of resources to allocate to each. We are currently evaluating (i) PRAX-944 for the treatment of essential tremor, or ET, and Parkinson's Disease, (ii) PRAX-562 for the treatment of a broad range of rare CNS disorders, including severe pediatric epilepsies and rare adult cephalgias; (iii) PRAX-222 for the treatment of SCN2A development and epileptic encephalopathy, or SCN2A-DEE; and (iv) PRAX-114 for the treatment of psychiatric disorders. Our drug development strategy is to clinically test and seek regulatory approval for our product candidates in indications in which we believe we will be able to efficiently generate proof-of-concept data. If any of our product candidates is approved, we then intend to expand to clinical testing and potentially seek regulatory approvals in other neurological and psychiatric disease indications based on genetic and mechanistic overlap with the ~~SEC~~primary indication. However, even if our product candidates are able to gain regulatory approval in one indication, there is no guarantee that we will be able to gain regulatory approval in another indication or expand to other indications.

In addition, we may focus resources on ~~March 17, 2021.~~pursuing indications outside of neurology based on the same strategic approach (e.g., human genetics, mechanistic rationale, the availability of translational tools, clinical development path, commercial opportunity) we utilize in determining on which of our discovery programs to focus. Our decisions concerning the allocation of research, development, collaboration, management and financial resources toward particular product candidates or therapeutic areas may not lead to the development of any viable commercial product and may divert resources away from better opportunities. For example, in June 2022, we announced that we are undergoing a strategic realignment to focus resources on our Movement Disorders and Epilepsy franchises. Additionally, we may reprioritize product candidate development plans and activities at any time and delay or terminate development of any product candidates we identify. Similarly, our potential decisions to delay, terminate, or collaborate with third parties in respect of certain programs may subsequently also prove to be suboptimal and could cause us to miss valuable opportunities. If we make incorrect determinations regarding the viability or market potential of any of our programs or product candidates or misread trends in the biopharmaceutical industry, in particular for neurological and psychiatric diseases, our business, financial condition, and results of operations could be materially adversely affected. As a result, we may fail to capitalize on viable commercial products or profitable market opportunities, be required to forego or delay pursuit of opportunities with other product candidates or other diseases and disease pathways that may later prove to have greater commercial potential than those we choose to

pursue or relinquish valuable rights to such product candidates through collaboration, licensing or other royalty arrangements in cases in which it would have been advantageous for us to invest additional resources to retain sole development and commercialization rights.

Risks Related to Research and Development and the Biopharmaceutical Industry

Risks Related to Preclinical and Clinical Development

The development and commercialization of drug products is subject to extensive regulation, and the regulatory approval processes of the FDA and comparable foreign authorities are lengthy, time-consuming, and inherently unpredictable. If we are ultimately unable to obtain regulatory approval for our product candidates on a timely basis if at all, our business will be substantially harmed.

The clinical development, manufacturing, labeling, packaging, storage, recordkeeping, advertising, promotion, export, import, marketing, distribution, adverse event reporting, including the submission of safety and other post-marketing information and reports, and other possible activities relating to our product candidates are subject to extensive regulation. In the United States, obtaining marketing approval for a new drug requires the submission of a New Drug Application, or NDA, to the FDA, and we are not permitted to market any product candidate in the United States until we obtain approval from the FDA of the NDA for that product candidate. An NDA must be supported by extensive clinical and preclinical data, as well as extensive information regarding pharmacology, chemistry, manufacturing, and controls. Outside the United States, many comparable foreign regulatory authorities employ similar approval processes.

We have not previously submitted an NDA to the FDA or similar marketing authorization application to comparable foreign authorities, for any product candidate, and we cannot be certain that any of our product candidates will receive regulatory approval. Obtaining approval of an NDA can be a lengthy, expensive, and uncertain process, and as a company we have no experience with the preparation of an NDA submission or any other marketing authorization application.

Our product candidates could fail to receive regulatory approval for many reasons, including the following:

•the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities may disagree with the design or implementation of our clinical trials;

•we may be unable to demonstrate to the satisfaction of the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities that a product candidate is safe and effective for its proposed indication;

•the results of clinical trials may not meet the level of statistical significance required by the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities for approval;

•we may be unable to demonstrate that a product candidate’s clinical and other benefits outweigh its safety risks;

•the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities may disagree with our interpretation of data from preclinical studies or clinical trials;

•the data collected from clinical trials of our product candidates may not be sufficient to support the submission of an NDA or other submission or to obtain regulatory approval in the United States or elsewhere, or regulatory authorities may not accept a submission due to, among other reasons, the content or formatting of the submission;

•the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities may fail to approve our manufacturing processes or facilities or those of third-party manufacturers with which we contract for clinical and commercial supplies; and

•the approval policies or regulations of the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities may significantly change in a manner rendering our clinical data insufficient for approval.

This lengthy approval process, as well as the unpredictability of future clinical trial results, may result in our failing to obtain regulatory approval to market any of our product candidates, which would significantly harm our business, results of operations, and prospects. The FDA and comparable foreign regulatory authorities have substantial discretion in the approval process, and determining when or whether regulatory approval will be obtained for any of our product candidates. For example, regulatory authorities in various jurisdictions have in the past had, and may in the future have, differing requirements for, interpretations of and opinions on our preclinical and clinical data. As a result, we may be required to conduct additional preclinical studies, alter our proposed clinical trial designs, or conduct additional clinical trials to satisfy the regulatory authorities in each of the jurisdictions in

which we hope to conduct clinical trials and develop and market our products, if approved. Further, even if we believe the data collected from clinical trials of our product candidates are promising, such data may not be sufficient to support approval by the FDA or any comparable foreign regulatory authority.

In addition, even if we were to obtain approval, regulatory authorities may approve any of our product candidates for fewer or more limited indications than we request, may not approve the price we intend to charge for our products, may grant approval contingent on the performance of costly post-marketing clinical trials, or may approve a product candidate with a label that does not include the labeling claims necessary or desirable for the successful commercialization of that product candidate. Any of the foregoing scenarios could materially harm the commercial prospects for our product candidates.

Preclinical and clinical drug development involves a lengthy, complex and expensive process, with an uncertain outcome. The outcome of preclinical testing and early clinical trials may not be predictive of the success of later clinical trials, and the results of our clinical trials may not satisfy the requirements of the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities.

To obtain the requisite regulatory approvals to commercialize any product candidates, we must demonstrate through extensive preclinical studies and clinical trials that our product candidates are safe and effective in humans. Clinical testing is expensive and can take many years to complete, and its outcome is inherently uncertain. In particular, pivotal clinical trials typically involve hundreds of patients, have significant costs and take years to complete. A product candidate can fail at any stage of testing, even after observing promising signs of activity in earlier preclinical studies or clinical trials. The results of preclinical studies and early clinical trials of our product candidates may not be predictive of the results of later-stage clinical trials. In addition, initial success in clinical trials may not be indicative of results obtained when such trials are completed.

There is typically an extremely high rate of attrition from the failure of product candidates proceeding through clinical trials. Product candidates in later stages of clinical trials may fail to show the desired safety and efficacy profile despite having progressed through preclinical studies and initial clinical trials. For example, in June 2022, we announced that the Phase 2/3 Aria Study evaluating the efficacy and safety of PRAX-114 for monotherapy treatment of major depressive disorder did not achieve statistical significance on the primary endpoint of change from baseline in the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale total score at Day 15, or on any secondary endpoints. Most product candidates that commence clinical trials are never approved as products and there can be no assurance that any of our future clinical trials will ultimately be successful or support further clinical development of our product candidates. The commencement and rate of completion of preclinical studies and clinical trials for a product candidate may be delayed by many factors, including, for example:

•inability to generate sufficient preclinical or other in vivo or in vitro data to support the initiation of clinical studies;

•timely completion of preclinical laboratory tests, animal studies and formulation studies in accordance with the Good Laboratory Practice requirements and other applicable regulations of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or FDA;

•approval by an independent Institutional Review Board, or IRB, or ethics committee at each clinical site before each trial may be initiated;

•delays in reaching a consensus with regulatory agencies on study design and obtaining regulatory authorization to commence clinical trials; delays in reaching agreement on acceptable terms with prospective contract research organizations, or CROs, and clinical trial sites, the terms of which can be subject to extensive negotiation and may vary significantly among different CROs and clinical trial sites;

•delays in identifying, recruiting and training suitable clinical investigators;

•delays in recruiting suitable patients to participate in our clinical trials;

•delays in manufacturing, testing, releasing, validating or importing/exporting sufficient stable quantities of our product candidates for use in clinical trials or the inability to do any of the foregoing;

•insufficient or inadequate supply or quality of product candidates or other materials necessary for use in clinical trials, or delays in sufficiently developing, characterizing or controlling a manufacturing process suitable for clinical trials;

•imposition of a temporary or permanent clinical hold by regulatory authorities;

•developments on trials conducted by competitors for related technology that raises FDA or foreign regulatory authority concerns about risk to patients of the technology broadly, or if the FDA or a foreign

regulatory authority finds that the investigational protocol or plan is clearly deficient to meet its stated objectives;

•delays in recruiting, screening and enrolling patients and delays caused by patients withdrawing from clinical trials or failing to return for post-treatment follow-up;

•difficulty collaborating with patient groups and investigators;

•failure by our CROs, other third parties or us to adhere to clinical trial protocols; failure to perform in accordance with the FDA’s or any other regulatory authority’s Good Clinical Practice requirements, or applicable regulatory guidelines in other countries;

•occurrence of adverse events associated with the product candidate that are viewed to outweigh its potential benefits, or occurrence of adverse events in trials of the same class of agents conducted by other companies;

•changes to the clinical trial protocols;

•clinical sites deviating from trial protocol or dropping out of a trial;

•changes in regulatory requirements and guidance that require amending or submitting new clinical protocols;

•changes in the standard of care on which a clinical development plan was based, which may require new or additional trials;

•selection of clinical endpoints that require prolonged periods of observation or analyses of resulting data;

•the cost of clinical trials of our product candidates being greater than we anticipated;

•clinical trials of our product candidates producing negative or inconclusive results, which may result in our deciding, or regulators requiring us, to conduct additional clinical trials or abandon development of such product candidates;

•transfer of manufacturing processes to larger-scale facilities operated by a contract manufacturing organization, or CMO, and delays or failure by our CMOs or us to make any necessary changes to such manufacturing process; and

•third parties being unwilling or unable to satisfy their contractual obligations to us.

In addition, disruptions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic may increase the likelihood that we encounter such difficulties or delays in initiating, enrolling, conducting or completing our planned and ongoing preclinical studies and clinical trials.

Clinical trials must be conducted in accordance with the FDA and other applicable regulatory authorities’ legal requirements, regulations or guidelines, and are subject to oversight by these governmental agencies and ethics committees or IRBs at the medical institutions where the clinical trials are conducted. Before commencing a clinical trial, the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities could raise questions about or concerns with our proposed clinical protocol, including issuing a clinical hold on a trial until such questions or concerns are resolved, which could delay our clinical development plans. For example, in May 2022, we received a letter from the FDA providing additional information on the clinical hold placed on our Investigational New Drug application, or IND, for the study of PRAX-222. Our subsequent communications with the FDA indicated that, upon submission of additional documentation in relation to the completed 13-week non-human primate toxicology study supporting our proposed starting dose, the IND could be cleared. We have submitted the requested documentation for the 13-week non-human primate toxicology study and will engage with the FDA on the study design, as needed upon completion of their review of these data.

We could also encounter delays if a clinical trial is suspended or terminated by us, by the IRBs of the institutions in which such trials are being conducted, by a Data Safety Monitoring Board for such trial or by the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities. Such authorities may impose such a suspension or termination due to a number of factors, including failure to conduct the clinical trial in accordance with regulatory requirements or our clinical protocols, inspection of the clinical trial operations or trial site by the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities resulting in the imposition of a clinical hold, unforeseen safety issues or adverse side effects, failure to demonstrate a benefit from using a drug, changes in governmental regulations or administrative actions or lack of adequate funding to continue the clinical trial. In addition, we may need to amend clinical trial protocols that could require us to resubmit our clinical trial protocols to IRBs or ethics committees for reexamination, which may impact the costs, timing or successful completion of a clinical trial.

Some of our trials are, have been, and may in the future be open-label studies, where both the patient and investigator know whether the patient is receiving the investigational product candidate or either an existing approved drug or placebo. Most typically, open-label clinical trials test only the investigational product candidate and sometimes do so at different dose levels. Open-label clinical trials are subject to various limitations that may exaggerate any therapeutic effect as patients in open-label clinical trials are aware when they are receiving treatment. In addition, open-label clinical trials may be subject to an “investigator bias” where those assessing and reviewing the physiological outcomes of the clinical trials are aware of which patients have received treatment and may interpret the information of the treated group more favorably given this knowledge. Therefore, it is possible that positive results observed in open-label trials will not be replicated in later placebo-controlled trials. Additionally, the trial design differences and placebo effects that may be possible in clinical research for the indications we are studying may make it difficult to extrapolate the results of earlier clinical trials to later clinical trials or to interpret the clinical data in any of our trials.

Further, conducting clinical trials in foreign countries, as we have done and may continue to do, for our product candidates, presents additional risks that may delay completion of our clinical trials. These risks include the failure of enrolled patients in foreign countries to adhere to clinical protocol as a result of differences in healthcare services or cultural customs, managing additional administrative burdens associated with foreign regulatory schemes, as well as political and economic risks relevant to such foreign countries.

Moreover, principal investigators for our clinical trials may serve as scientific advisors or consultants to us from time to time and receive compensation in connection with such services. Under certain circumstances, we may be required to report some of these relationships to the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities. The FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authority may conclude that a financial relationship between us and a principal investigator has created a conflict of interest or otherwise affected interpretation of the study. The FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authority may therefore question the integrity of the data generated at the applicable clinical trial site and the utility of the clinical trial itself may be jeopardized. This could result in a delay in approval, or rejection, of our marketing applications by the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authority, as the case may be, and may ultimately lead to the denial of marketing approval of one or more of our product candidates.

Delays in the completion of any preclinical studies or clinical trials of our product candidates will increase our costs, slow down our product candidate development and approval process and delay or potentially jeopardize our ability to commence product sales and generate product revenue. In addition, many of the factors that cause, or lead to, a delay in the commencement or completion of clinical trials may also ultimately lead to the denial of regulatory approval of our product candidates. Any delays to our preclinical studies or clinical trials that occur as a result could shorten any period during which we may have the exclusive right to commercialize our product candidates and our competitors may be able to bring products to market before we do, and the commercial viability of our product candidates could be significantly reduced. Any of these occurrences may harm our business, financial condition and prospects significantly.

Our product candidates may cause undesirable side effects or have other properties that could delay or prevent their regulatory approval, limit their commercial potential or result in significant negative consequences following regulatory approval, if obtained.

Results of our clinical trials could reveal a high and unacceptable severity and prevalence of side effects or unexpected characteristics. Undesirable side effects caused by our product candidates could cause us or regulatory authorities to interrupt, delay or halt clinical trials and could result in a more restrictive label or the delay or denial of regulatory approval by the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities. Results of our clinical trials could reveal a high and unacceptable severity and prevalence of side effects or unexpected characteristics. In addition, many compounds that have initially showed promise in clinical or earlier stage testing are later found to cause undesirable or unexpected side effects that prevented further development of the compound. Additionally, the composition of our product candidates or learnings in preclinical studies or clinical trials may result in contraindications for any product candidates for which we may obtain regulatory approval.

If unacceptable side effects arise in the development of our product candidates, we, foreign regulatory authorities, or the FDA, the IRBs or DSMBs at the institutions in which our trials are conducted could suspend or terminate our preclinical studies or clinical trials or foreign regulatory authorities or the FDA could order us to cease preclinical studies or clinical trials or deny approval of our product candidates for any or all targeted indications.

Treatment-emergent side effects that are deemed to be drug-related could also affect subject recruitment or the ability of enrolled subjects to complete the trial or result in potential product liability claims. Undesirable side effects in one of our clinical trials for our product candidates in one indication could adversely affect enrollment in clinical trials, regulatory approval and commercialization of our product candidates in other indications. In addition,

these side effects may not be appropriately recognized or managed by the treating medical staff. Any of these occurrences may harm our business, financial condition and prospects significantly.

Moreover, clinical trials of our product candidates are conducted in carefully defined sets of patients who have agreed to enter into clinical trials. Consequently, it is possible that our clinical trials, or those of any future collaborator, may indicate an apparent positive effect of a product candidate that is greater than the actual positive effect, if any, or alternatively fail to identify undesirable side effects. Clinical trials by their nature utilize a sample of the potential patient population. With a limited number of patients, rare and severe side effects of our product candidates may only be uncovered with a significantly larger number of patients exposed to the product candidate. If our product candidates receive marketing approval and we or others identify undesirable side effects caused by such product candidates (or any other similar products) after such approval, a number of potentially significant negative consequences could result, including:

•regulatory authorities may withdraw or limit their approval of such product candidates;

•regulatory authorities may require the addition of labeling statements, such as a Boxed Warning or contraindications;

•we may be required to change the way such product candidates are distributed or administered, or change the labeling of the product candidates;

•the FDA may require a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy, or REMS, plan to mitigate risks, which could include medication guides, physician communication plans or elements to assure safe use, such as restricted distribution methods, patient registries and other risk minimization tools, and regulatory authorities in other jurisdictions may require comparable risk mitigation plans;

•we may be subject to regulatory investigations and government enforcement actions;

•the FDA or a comparable foreign regulatory authority may require us to conduct additional clinical trials or costly post-marketing testing and surveillance to monitor the safety and efficacy of the product;

•we could be sued and held liable for injury caused to individuals exposed to or taking our product candidates; and

•our reputation may suffer.

Any of these events could prevent us from achieving or maintaining market acceptance of the affected product candidates and could substantially increase the costs of commercializing our product candidates, if approved, and significantly impact our ability to successfully commercialize our product candidates and generate revenues.

If we encounter difficulties enrolling patients in our future clinical trials, our clinical development activities could be delayed or otherwise adversely affected.

We have, and may in the future, experience difficulties in patient enrollment in our clinical trials for a variety of reasons. The timely completion of clinical trials in accordance with their protocols depends, among other things, on our ability to enroll a sufficient number of patients who remain in the study until its conclusion.

Patient enrollment is affected by many factors, including:

•the patient eligibility criteria defined in the protocol;

•the size and nature of the patient population required for analysis of the trial’s primary endpoints;

•in the case clinical trials focused on rare disease, the small size of the patient population and the potential of a patient being undiagnosed or misdiagnosed;

•the proximity of patients to trial sites;

•the design of the trial;

•our ability to recruit clinical trial investigators with the appropriate competencies and experience;

•competing clinical trials and clinicians’ and patients’ perceptions as to the potential advantages and risks of the product candidate being studied in relation to other available therapies, including any new drugs that may be approved for the indications that we are investigating;

•the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on clinical trial sites, personnel and patient travel ~~(see~~(see —Business interruptions resulting from COVID-19 or a similar pandemic, epidemic or outbreak of an infectious disease in the United States or worldwide may adversely affect our business);

•our ability to obtain and maintain patient consents; and

•the risk that patients enrolled in clinical trials will drop out of the trials before completion.

In addition, our clinical trials will compete with other clinical trials for product candidates that are in the same therapeutic areas as our product candidates, and this competition will reduce the number and types of patients available to us, because some patients who might have opted to enroll in our trials may instead opt to enroll in a trial being conducted by one of our competitors. Since the number of qualified clinical investigators is limited, we expect to conduct some of our clinical trials at the same clinical trial sites that some of our competitors use, which will reduce the number of patients who are available for our clinical trials in such clinical trial site.

Our inability to enroll a sufficient number of patients for our clinical trials would result in significant delays or might require us to abandon one or more clinical trials altogether. Delays in patient enrollment may result in increased costs, affect the timing or outcome of the planned clinical trials, product candidate development and approval process and jeopardize our ability to seek and obtain the regulatory approval required to commence product sales and generate revenue, which could prevent completion of these trials, adversely affect our ability to advance the development of our product candidates, cause the value of our company to decline and limit our ability to obtain additional financing if needed.

We are also required to register certain clinical trials and post the results of completed clinical trials on a government-sponsored database, such aswww.ClinicalTrials.govin the United States, within certain timeframes. Failure to do so can result in fines, adverse publicity and civil and criminal sanctions.

Interim, topline and preliminary data from our clinical trials that we announce or publish from time to time may change as more patient data become available, and are subject to audit and verification procedures that could result in material changes in the final data.

From time to time, we may publicly disclose preliminary or topline data from our clinical trials, which are based on a preliminary analysis of then-available data, and the results and related findings and conclusions are subject to change following a more comprehensive review of the data related to the particular study or trial. We also make assumptions, estimations, calculations and conclusions as part of our analyses of data, and we may not have received or had the opportunity to fully and carefully evaluate all data. As a result, the topline or preliminary results that we report may differ from future results of the same studies, or different conclusions or considerations may qualify such results, once additional data have been received and fully evaluated. Topline or preliminary data also remain subject to audit and verification procedures that may result in the final data being materially different from the topline or preliminary data we previously reported. As a result, topline and preliminary data should be viewed with caution until the final data are available.

From time to time, we may also disclose interim data from our preclinical studies and clinical trials. Interim data from clinical trials that we may complete are subject to the risk that one or more of the clinical outcomes may materially change as patient enrollment continues and more patient data become available. Adverse changes between interim data and final data could significantly harm our business and prospects. Further, additional disclosure of interim data by us or by our competitors in the future could result in volatility in the price of our common stock.

Further, others, including regulatory agencies, may not accept or agree with our assumptions, estimates, calculations, conclusions or analyses or may interpret or weigh the importance of data differently, which could impact the value of the particular program, the approvability or commercialization of the particular product candidate and our company in general. In addition, the information we choose to publicly disclose regarding a particular study or clinical trial is typically selected from a more extensive amount of available information. Others may not agree with what we determine is the material or otherwise appropriate information to include in our disclosure, and any information we determine not to disclose may ultimately be deemed significant with respect to future decisions, conclusions, views, activities or otherwise regarding a particular product candidate or our business. If the interim, preliminary or topline data that we report differ from later, final or actual results, or if others, including the FDA and comparable foreign regulatory authorities, disagree with the conclusions reached, our ability to obtain approval for, and commercialize our product candidates may be harmed, which could harm our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

The markets for our product candidates may be smaller than we expect.

Our estimates of the potential market opportunities in each of our franchises include several key assumptions based on our industry knowledge, industry publications and third-party research reports and other data sources and estimates. There can be no assurance that any of these assumptions are, or will remain, accurate. If the actual markets identified in each of our franchises, or for any other product candidate we may develop in the future, is

smaller than we expect, our revenues, if any, may be limited and it may be more difficult for us to achieve or maintain profitability.

We may not be successful in our efforts to identify or discover additional product candidates in the future.

Our research programs may initially show promise in identifying potential product candidates, yet fail to yield product candidates for clinical development or commercialization for a number of reasons, including:

•our inability to design such product candidates with the pharmacological or pharmacokinetic properties that we desire; or

•potential product candidates may, on further study, be shown to have harmful side effects or other characteristics that indicate that they are unlikely to be medicines that will receive marketing approval and achieve market acceptance.

Research programs to identify new product candidates require substantial technical, financial and human resources. If we are unable to identify suitable compounds for preclinical and clinical development, we will not be able to obtain product revenue in future periods, which likely would result in significant harm to our financial position and adversely impact our stock price.

We have begun conducting clinical trials for our product candidates in the United States, and may in the future conduct clinical trials in Europe and other jurisdictions, and the FDA, the European Medicines Agency, or EMA, and applicable foreign regulatory authorities may not accept data from trials conducted outside those respective jurisdictions.

We previously conducted preclinical studies and clinical trials in Australia and New Zealand and we may in the future conduct preclinical studies and clinical trials in other jurisdictions outside the United States. The acceptance of study data from preclinical studies and clinical trials conducted outside the United States may be subject to certain conditions for acceptance. For example, in cases where data from foreign clinical trials are intended to serve as the basis for marketing approval in the United States, the FDA will generally not approve the application on the basis of foreign data alone unless (i) the data are applicable to the United States population and United States medical practice; (ii) the trials were performed by clinical investigators of recognized competence and pursuant to GCP regulations; and the trials were performed by clinical investigators of recognized competence; and the data are considered valid without the need for an on-site inspection by the FDA or, if the FDA considers such an inspection to be necessary, the FDA is able to validate the data through an on-site inspection or other appropriate means. For trials that are conducted only at sites outside of the United States and not subject to an IND, the FDA requires the clinical trial to have been conducted in accordance with GCP and the FDA must be able to validate the data from the clinical trial through an on-site inspection if it deems such inspection necessary. For such trials not subject to an IND, the FDA generally does not provide advance comment on the clinical protocols for the trials, and therefore there is an additional potential risk that the FDA could determine that the trial design or protocol for a non-United States clinical trial was inadequate, which could require us to conduct additional clinical trials. Many foreign regulatory bodies, such as the EMA, have similar approval requirements. In addition, such foreign trials would be subject to the applicable local laws of the foreign jurisdictions where the trials are conducted. There can be no assurance that the FDA, EMA or any applicable foreign regulatory authority will accept data from trials conducted outside of the United States or the applicable jurisdiction. If the FDA, EMA or any applicable foreign regulatory authority does not accept such data, it would result in the need for additional trials, which would be costly and time-consuming and delay aspects of our business plan, and which may result in our product candidates not receiving approval or clearance for commercialization in the applicable jurisdiction.

We have obtained orphan drug designation for PRAX-562 and PRAX-222 and may plan to seek orphan drug designation for additional product candidates, but we may be unable to obtain or maintain such a designation or the benefits associated with orphan drug status, including marketing exclusivity, which may cause our revenue, if any, to be reduced.

In the United States, under the Orphan Drug Act, the FDA may grant orphan designation to a drug intended to treat a rare disease or condition, defined as a disease or condition with a patient population of fewer than 200,000 in the United States, or a patient population greater than 200,000 in the United States when there is no reasonable expectation that the cost of developing and making available the drug or biologic in the United States will be recovered from sales in the United States for that drug. Orphan drug designation must be requested and granted by the FDA before a new NDA is submitted. After the FDA grants orphan drug designation, it will disclose publicly the generic identity of the drug and its potential orphan use. Orphan drug designation does not convey any advantage in, or shorten the duration of, the regulatory review and approval process. The FDA has granted orphan drug

designation to PRAX-562 for the treatment of SCN2A-DEE and SCN8A-DEE, respectively, and to PRAX-222 for the treatment of SCN2A-DEE.

In the United States, orphan designation entitles a party to financial incentives such as opportunities for grant funding toward clinical trial costs, tax advantages and user-fee waivers. In addition, if a product candidate that has orphan designation subsequently receives the first FDA approval for the disease for which it has such designation, the product is entitled to orphan drug exclusivity, which means that the FDA may not approve any other applications, including a biologics license application, to market the same product for the same indication for seven years, except in limited circumstances, such as a showing of clinical superiority to the product with orphan drug exclusivity or where the manufacturer is unable to assure sufficient product quantity. The applicable exclusivity period is ten years in Europe, but such exclusivity period can be reduced to six years if a product no longer meets the criteria for orphan designation or if the product is sufficiently profitable that market exclusivity is no longer justified.

Even if we obtain orphan drug exclusivity for a product, that exclusivity may not effectively protect the product from competition because different drugs can be approved for the same condition. Even after an orphan drug is approved, the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authority can subsequently approve the same drug for the same condition if such regulatory authority concludes that the later drug is clinically superior because it is shown to be safer, more effective or makes a major contribution to patient care. Orphan drug exclusivity may also be lost if the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authority later determines that the initial request for designation was materially defective. In addition, orphan drug exclusivity does not prevent the FDA from approving competing drugs for the same or similar indication containing a different active ingredient. In addition, if a subsequent drug is approved for marketing for the same or a similar indication as any of our product candidates that receive marketing approval, we may face increased competition and lose market share regardless of orphan drug exclusivity. Orphan drug designation neither shortens the development time or regulatory review time of a drug nor gives the drug any advantage in the regulatory review or approval process.

We have received rare pediatric disease designation for PRAX-562 and PRAX-222. However, a marketing application for these product candidates, if approved, may not meet the eligibility criteria for a rare pediatric disease priority review voucher.

In 2012, U.S. Congress authorized the FDA to award priority review vouchers to sponsors of certain rare pediatric disease product applications. This program is designed to encourage development of new drug and biological products for prevention and treatment of certain rare pediatric diseases. Specifically, under this program, a sponsor who receives an approval for a drug or biologic for a “rare pediatric disease” that meets certain criteria may qualify for a voucher that can be redeemed to receive a priority review of a subsequent marketing application for a different product. The sponsor of a rare pediatric disease drug product receiving a priority review voucher may transfer (including by sale) the voucher to another sponsor. The voucher may be further transferred any number of times before the voucher is used, as long as the sponsor making the transfer has not yet submitted the application. The FDA may also revoke any priority review voucher if the rare pediatric disease drug for which the voucher was awarded is not marketed in the United States within one year following the date of approval.

We received rare pediatric disease designation for PRAX-562 for the treatment of SCN2A-DEE and SCN8A-DEE, and for PRAX-222 for the treatment of SCN2A-DEE. Designation of a drug product as a product for a rare pediatric disease does not guarantee that a NDA for such drug product will meet the eligibility criteria for a rare pediatric disease priority review voucher at the time the application is approved. Under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, or FDCA, we will need to request a rare pediatric disease priority review voucher in our original NDA for our product candidates for which we have received rare pediatric disease designation. The FDA may determine that a NDA for any such product candidates, if approved, do not meet the eligibility criteria for a priority review voucher.

The authority for the FDA to award rare pediatric disease priority review vouchers for drug products after September 30, 2024 is currently limited to product candidates that receive rare pediatric disease designation on or prior to September 30, 2024, and the FDA may only award rare pediatric disease priority review vouchers through September 30, 2026. However, it is possible the authority for the FDA to award rare pediatric disease priority review vouchers will be further extended by Congress.

Risks Related to Regulatory Approval

Obtaining and maintaining regulatory approval of our product candidates in one jurisdiction does not mean that we will be successful in obtaining regulatory approval of our product candidates in other jurisdictions.

Obtaining and maintaining regulatory approval of our product candidates in one jurisdiction does not guarantee that we will be able to obtain or maintain regulatory approval in any other jurisdiction, but a failure or

delay in obtaining regulatory approval in one jurisdiction may have a negative effect on the regulatory approval process in others. For example, even if the FDA grants approval of a product candidate, comparable regulatory authorities in other jurisdictions, including Australia and Europe, must also approve the manufacturing, marketing and sale of the product candidate in those countries. Approval procedures vary among jurisdictions and can involve requirements and administrative review periods different from those in the United States, including additional preclinical studies or clinical trials as clinical trials conducted in one jurisdiction may not be accepted by regulatory authorities in other jurisdictions. In many jurisdictions outside the United States, a product candidate must also be approved for reimbursement before it can be approved for sale in that jurisdiction. In some cases, the price that we intend to charge for our products is also subject to governmental approval.

Obtaining foreign regulatory approvals and compliance with foreign regulatory requirements could result in significant delays, difficulties and costs for us and could delay or prevent the introduction of our products in certain countries. If we or any partner we work with fail to comply with the regulatory requirements in international markets or fail to receive applicable marketing approvals, our target market will be reduced and our ability to realize the full market potential of our product candidates will be harmed.

Our product candidates may be regulated as controlled substances, the making, use, sale, importation, exportation, and distribution of which are subject to significant regulation by the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration, or DEA, and other regulatory agencies.

Our product candidates may be classified as controlled substances, which are subject to state, federal, and foreign laws and regulations regarding their manufacture, use, sale, importation, exportation, and distribution. Among other things, controlled substances are regulated under the federal Controlled Substances Act of 1970, and regulations of the DEA.

The DEA regulates controlled substances as Schedule I, II, III, IV or V substances. Schedule I substances by definition have no established medicinal use and may not be marketed or sold in the United States. A pharmaceutical product may be listed as Schedule II, III, IV or V, with Schedule II substances considered to present the highest risk of abuse and Schedule V substances the lowest relative risk of abuse among such substances. Prior to commercialization, centrally acting drugs, such as those we are developing, are generally subject to review and potential scheduling by the DEA. It is possible that our product candidates may be regulated by the DEA as controlled substances, which would subject such product candidates to additional restrictions regarding their manufacture, shipment, storage, sale and use, depending on the scheduling of the active ingredients, and may limit the commercial potential of any of our product candidates, if approved.

Various states also independently regulate controlled substances. Though state controlled substances laws often mirror federal law, because the states are separate jurisdictions, they may separately schedule drugs as well. While some states automatically schedule a drug when the DEA does so, in other states there must be rule making or a legislative action. State scheduling may delay commercial sale of any controlled substance drug product for which we obtain federal regulatory approval and adverse scheduling could impair the commercial attractiveness of such product. We or our collaborators must also obtain separate state registrations in order to be able to obtain, handle and distribute controlled substances for clinical trials or commercial sale, and failure to meet applicable regulatory requirements could lead to enforcement and sanctions from the states in addition to those from the DEA or otherwise arising under federal law.

For any of our product candidates classified as controlled substances, we and our suppliers, manufacturers, contractors, customers and distributors are required to obtain and maintain applicable registrations from state, federal and foreign law enforcement and regulatory agencies and comply with state, federal and foreign laws and regulations regarding the manufacture, use, sale, importation, exportation and distribution of controlled substances. There is a risk that DEA regulations may limit the supply of the compounds used in clinical trials for our product candidates, and, in the future, the ability to produce and distribute our products in the volume needed to meet commercial demand. Regulations associated with controlled substances govern manufacturing, labeling, packaging, testing, dispensing, production and procurement quotas, recordkeeping, reporting, handling, shipment and disposal. These regulations increase the personnel needs and the expense associated with development and commercialization of product candidates including controlled substances. The DEA, and some states, conduct periodic inspections of registered establishments that handle controlled substances. Failure to obtain and maintain required registrations or comply with any applicable regulations could delay or preclude us from developing and commercializing our product candidates containing controlled substances and subject us to enforcement action. The DEA may seek civil penalties, refuse to renew necessary registrations or initiate proceedings to revoke those registrations. In some circumstances, violations could lead to criminal proceedings. Because of their restrictive nature, these regulations could limit commercialization of any of our product candidates that are classified as controlled substances.

We could be subject to product liability lawsuits based on the use of our product candidates in clinical testing or, if obtained, following our products’ marketing approval and commercialization. Product liability lawsuits brought against us or any of our future collaborators could divert our resources and attention, require us to cease clinical testing, cause us to incur substantial liabilities or limit commercialization of our product candidates.

We are exposed to potential product liability and professional indemnity risks that are inherent in the research, development, manufacturing, marketing and use of biopharmaceutical products. Currently, we have no products that have been approved for commercial sale; however, the use of our product candidates by us and any collaborators in clinical trials may expose us to liability claims. We will face an even greater risk if product candidates are approved by regulatory authorities and introduced commercially. Product liability claims may be brought against us or our partners if any product candidate we develop allegedly causes injury or is found to be otherwise unsuitable for human use during product testing, manufacturing, marketing or sale. Any such product liability claim may include allegations of defects in manufacturing, defects in design, a failure to warn of dangers inherent in the product, negligence, strict liability and a breach of warranties. Claims could also be asserted under state consumer protection acts. Such claims could be made by participants enrolled in our clinical trials, patients, health care providers, biopharmaceutical companies, our collaborators or others using, administering or selling any of our future approved products. If we cannot successfully defend ourselves against any such claims, we may incur substantial liabilities or be required to limit commercialization of our product candidates. Even successful defense would require significant financial and management resources.

Regardless of the merits or eventual outcome, product liability claims may result in:

•decreased demand for any of our future approved products;

•injury to our reputation;

•withdrawal of clinical trial participants;

•termination of clinical trial sites or entire trial programs;

•significant litigation costs;

•substantial monetary awards to, or costly settlements with, patients or other claimants;

•product recalls or a change in the indications for which any approved drug products may be used;

•loss of revenue;

•diversion of management and scientific resources from our business operations; and

•the inability to commercialize our product candidates.

Although the clinical trial process is designed to identify and assess potential side effects, clinical development does not always fully characterize the safety and efficacy profile of a new medicine, and it is always possible that a drug, even after regulatory approval, may exhibit unforeseen side effects. If our product candidates were to cause adverse side effects during clinical trials or after approval, we may be exposed to substantial liabilities. Physicians and patients may not comply with any warnings that identify known potential adverse effects and patients who should not use our product candidates. If any of our product candidates are approved for commercial sale, we will be highly dependent upon consumer perceptions of us and the safety and quality of our products. We could be adversely affected if we are subject to negative publicity associated with illness or other adverse effects resulting from physicians’ or patients’ use or misuse of our products or any similar products distributed by other companies.

Although we maintain product liability insurance coverage including clinical trial liability, this insurance may not fully cover potential liabilities that we may incur. The cost of any product liability litigation or other proceeding, even if resolved in our favor, could be substantial. We will need to increase our insurance coverage if we commercialize any product that receives regulatory approval. In addition, insurance coverage is becoming increasingly expensive. If we are unable to maintain sufficient insurance coverage at an acceptable cost or to otherwise protect against potential product liability claims, it could prevent or inhibit the development and commercial production and sale of our product candidates, which could harm our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

We face significant competition in an environment of rapid technological and scientific change, and there is a possibility that our competitors may achieve regulatory approval before us or develop therapies that are safer, more advanced or more effective than ours, which may negatively impact our ability to successfully market or commercialize any product candidates we may develop and ultimately harm our financial condition.

The development and commercialization of new drug products is highly competitive. We may face competition with respect to any product candidates that we seek to develop or commercialize in the future from biopharmaceutical companies worldwide. Potential competitors also include academic institutions, government agencies, and other public and private research organizations that conduct research, seek patent protection, and establish collaborative arrangements for research, development, manufacturing and commercialization.

Specifically, we face competition with T-type calcium channel inhibitor programs in development targeting ET, including that of Jazz Pharmaceuticals, as well as other programs in clinical development targeting other mechanisms of action, and approved therapies, such as propranolol, and off-label therapies, such as primidone; and sodium channel blocker or similar programs in development for DEEs, including those of SK-Pharma, Xenon Pharmaceuticals, Neurocrine Biosciences and Stoke Therapeutics, as well as other programs in clinical development targeting other mechanisms of action, and approved therapies including other existing ion channel blockers.

If any of these competitors or competitors for our other product candidates receive FDA approval before we do, our product candidates would not be the first treatment on the market, and our market share may be limited. In addition to competition from other companies targeting our target indications, any products we may develop may also face competition from other types of therapies.

Many of our current or potential competitors, either alone or with their strategic partners, have:

•greater financial, technical and human resources than we have at every stage of the discovery, development, manufacture and commercialization of products;

•more extensive experience in preclinical testing, conducting clinical trials, obtaining regulatory approvals, and in manufacturing, marketing and selling drug products;

•products that have been approved or are in late stages of development; and

•collaborative arrangements in our target markets with leading companies and research institutions.

Mergers and acquisitions in the biopharmaceutical industry may result in even more resources being concentrated among a smaller number of our competitors. Smaller or early-stage companies may also prove to be significant competitors, particularly through collaborative arrangements with large and established companies. These competitors also compete with us in recruiting and retaining qualified scientific and management personnel and establishing clinical trial sites and patient registration for clinical trials, as well as in acquiring technologies complementary to, or necessary for, our programs. Our commercial opportunity could be reduced or eliminated if our competitors develop and commercialize products that are safer, more effective, have fewer or less severe side effects, are more convenient or are less expensive than any products that we may develop. Furthermore, currently approved products could be discovered to have application for treatment of our targeted disease indications or similar indications, which could give such products significant regulatory and market timing advantages over our product candidates. Our competitors also may obtain FDA or other comparable foreign regulatory approval for their products more rapidly than we may obtain approval for ours and may obtain orphan product exclusivity from the FDA for indications that we are targeting, which could result in our competitors establishing a strong market position before we are able to enter the market. Additionally, products or technologies developed by our competitors may render our potential product candidates uneconomical or obsolete and we may not be successful in marketing any product candidates we may develop against competitors.

In addition, we could face litigation or other proceedings with respect to the scope, ownership, validity and/or enforceability of our patents relating to our competitors’ products and our competitors may allege that our products infringe, misappropriate or otherwise violate their intellectual property. The availability of our competitors’ products could limit the demand, and the price we are able to charge, for any products that we may develop and commercialize.

Risks Related to the Commercialization of our Product Candidates

Risks Related to Post-Marketing Regulatory Requirements

Any product candidate for which we obtain marketing approval will be subject to extensive post-marketing regulatory requirements and could be subject to post-marketing restrictions or withdrawal from the market, and we may be subject to penalties if we fail to comply with regulatory requirements or if we experience unanticipated problems with our products, when and if any of them are approved.

Even if the FDA or a comparable foreign regulatory authority approves any of our product candidates, we will be subject to ongoing regulatory requirements in the applicable jurisdictions for manufacturing, labeling, packaging,

storage, advertising, promotion, sampling, record-keeping, conduct of post-marketing studies and submission of safety, efficacy and other post-market information. In addition, we will be subject to continued compliance with cGMP or similar regulatory requirements outside the United States and GCP requirements for any clinical trials that we conduct post-approval.

Manufacturers and their facilities are required to comply with extensive regulatory authority requirements, including ensuring that quality control and manufacturing procedures conform to cGMP or other similar regulations. As such, we and our contract manufacturers will be subject to continual review and inspections to assess compliance with cGMP or similar regulatory requirements and adherence to commitments made in any marketing application, and previous responses to inspection observations. Accordingly, we and others with whom we work must continue to expend time, money, and effort in all areas of regulatory compliance, including manufacturing, production and quality control.

Any regulatory approvals that we receive for our product candidates may be subject to limitations on the approved indicated uses for which the product may be marketed or to the conditions of approval, or contain requirements for potentially costly post-marketing testing, including Phase 4 clinical trials and surveillance to monitor the safety and efficacy of the product candidate. In the United States, the FDA may also require a REMS program as a condition of approval of our product candidates, which could entail requirements for long-term patient follow-up, a medication guide, physician communication plans or additional elements to ensure safe use, such as restricted distribution methods, patient registries and other risk minimization tools. Similar requirements may apply in foreign jurisdictions. In addition, if the FDA or a comparable foreign regulatory authority approves our product candidates, we will have to comply with requirements including submissions of safety and other post-marketing information and reports and registration.

In the United States and elsewhere, the FDA and foreign regulatory authorities may withdraw approval if compliance with regulatory requirements and standards is not maintained or if problems occur after the product reaches the market. Later discovery of previously unknown problems with our product candidates, including adverse events of unanticipated severity or frequency, or with our third-party manufacturers or manufacturing processes, or failure to comply with regulatory requirements, may result in revisions to the approved labeling to add new safety information or other restrictions; imposition of post-market studies or clinical trials to assess new safety risks; or imposition of distribution restrictions or other restrictions under a REMS or similar program. Other potential consequences include, among other things:

•restrictions on the manufacturing of our products, the approved manufacturers or the manufacturing process;

•withdrawal of the product from the market or voluntary product recalls;

•requirements to conduct post-marketing studies or clinical trials;

•fines, restitution or disgorgement of profits or revenues;

•warning or untitled letters from the FDA or comparable notice of violations from foreign regulatory authorities;

•suspensions of any of our ongoing clinical trials;

•refusal by the FDA or foreign regulatory authorities to approve pending applications or supplements to approved applications filed by us or suspension or withdrawal of marketing approvals;

•product seizure or detention or refusal to permit the import or export of products; and

•consent decrees, injunctions or the imposition of civil or criminal penalties.

Violations of the FDCA relating to the promotion of prescription drugs may also lead to investigations alleging violations of federal and state health care fraud and abuse laws, as well as state consumer protection laws. Accordingly, to the extent we receive marketing approval for one or more of our product candidates, we and our third-party partners will continue to expend time, money and effort in all areas of regulatory compliance, including promotional and labeling compliance, manufacturing, production, product surveillance and quality control. Any government investigation of alleged violations of law could require us to expend significant time and resources in response and could generate negative publicity. Any failure to comply with ongoing regulatory requirements may significantly and adversely affect our ability to commercialize and generate revenue from our products, if approved. If regulatory sanctions are applied or if regulatory approval is withdrawn, the value of our company and our operating results will be adversely affected.

The policies of the FDA and of other regulatory authorities may change and additional government regulations may be enacted that could prevent, limit or delay regulatory approval of our product candidates. We cannot predict the likelihood, nature or extent of government regulation that may arise from future legislation or administrative action, either in the United States or abroad. If we are slow to, or unable to adapt to changes in existing requirements or the adoption of new requirements or policies, or if we are not able to maintain regulatory compliance, we may be subject to enforcement action and we may not achieve or sustain profitability.

The FDA and other regulatory agencies actively enforce the laws and regulations prohibiting the promotion of off-label uses. If we are found or alleged to have improperly promoted off-label uses, we may become subject to significant liability.

The FDA and other regulatory agencies strictly regulate the promotional claims that may be made about drug products. These regulations include standards and restrictions for direct-to-consumer advertising, industry-sponsored scientific and educational activities, promotional activities involving the internet and off-label promotion. For example, any regulatory approval that the FDA grants is limited to those indications and patient populations for which a drug is deemed to be safe and effective by the FDA.

While physicians in the United States may choose, and are generally permitted, to prescribe products for uses that are not described in the product’s labeling and for uses that differ from those tested in clinical trials and approved by the regulatory authorities, our ability to promote any of our products candidates, if approved, will be narrowly limited to those indications and populations that are specifically approved by the FDA or such other regulatory agencies, and if we are found to have promoted such off-label uses, we may become subject to significant liability. For example, the federal government has levied large civil and criminal fines against companies for alleged improper promotion and has enjoined several companies from engaging in off-label promotion. The government has also required companies to enter into consent decrees or imposed permanent injunctions under which specified promotional conduct is changed or curtailed. If we cannot successfully manage the promotion of our product candidates, if approved, we could become subject to significant liability, which would materially adversely affect our business and financial condition.

Risks Related to Sales, Marketing and Competition

Our commercial success depends upon attaining significant market acceptance of our drug product candidates, if approved, among physicians, patients, third-party payors and other members of the medical community.

Even if any of the product candidates we develop receives marketing approval, they may nonetheless fail to gain sufficient market acceptance by physicians, patients, third-party payors, such as Medicare and Medicaid programs and managed care organizations in the United States, and others in the medical community. In addition, the availability of coverage by third-party payors may be affected by existing and future health care reform measures designed to reduce the cost of health care. If the product candidates we develop do not achieve an adequate level of acceptance, we may not generate significant product revenues and we may not become profitable.

The degree of market acceptance of any product candidate, if approved for commercial sale, will depend on a number of factors, including:

•efficacy and potential advantages compared to alternative treatments;

•the ability to offer our products, if approved, for sale at competitive prices;

•relative convenience and ease of administration compared to alternative treatments;

•perceptions by the medical community, physicians, and patients, regarding the safety and effectiveness of our products and the willingness of the target patient population to try new therapies and of physicians to prescribe these therapies;

•the size of the market for such product candidate, based on the size of the patient subsets that we are targeting, in the territories for which we gain regulatory approval;

•the recommendations with respect to our product candidates in guidelines published by various scientific organizations applicable to us and our product candidates;

•the strength of sales, marketing and distribution support;

•the timing of any such marketing approval in relation to other product approvals;

•any restrictions on concomitant use of other medications;

•support from patient advocacy groups;

•the ability to obtain sufficient third-party coverage and adequate reimbursement; and

•the prevalence and severity of any side effects.

If government and other third-party payors do not provide coverage and adequate reimbursement levels for any products we commercialize, market acceptance and commercial success would be reduced.

The successful commercialization of our product candidates in the United States will depend in part on the extent to which third-party payors, including governmental authorities and private health insurers, provide coverage and adequate reimbursement levels, as well as implement pricing policies favorable for our product candidates. Failure to obtain or maintain coverage and adequate reimbursement for our product candidates, if approved, could limit our ability to market those products and decrease our ability to generate revenue.

Significant uncertainty exists as to the coverage and reimbursement status of any products for which we may obtain regulatory approval. In the United States and in other countries, patients who are provided medical treatment for their conditions generally rely on third-party payors to reimburse all or part of the costs associated with their treatment. The availability of coverage and adequacy of reimbursement for our products by third-party payors, including government health care programs (e.g., Medicare, Medicaid, TRICARE), managed care providers, private health insurers, health maintenance organizations and other organizations is essential for most patients to be able to afford medical services and biopharmaceutical products such as our product candidates. Third-party payors decide which medications they will pay for and establish reimbursement levels.

In the United States, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, or CMS, an agency within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, or HHS, determines whether and to what extent new products will be covered and reimbursed under Medicare and private payors tend to follow CMS to a substantial degree. Factors payors consider in determining reimbursement are based on whether the product is:

•a covered benefit under its health plan;

•safe, effective and medically necessary;

•appropriate for the specific patient;

•cost-effective; and

•neither experimental nor investigational.

Our ability to successfully commercialize our product candidates will depend in part on the extent to which coverage and adequate reimbursement for our products and related treatments will be available from third-party payors. Moreover, a payor’s decision to provide coverage for a product does not imply that an adequate reimbursement rate will be approved. If coverage and adequate reimbursement is not available, or is available only to limited levels, we may not be able to successfully commercialize our product candidates. Even if coverage is provided, the approved reimbursement amount may not be high enough to allow us to establish or maintain pricing sufficient to realize a sufficient return on our investment.

In the United States, no uniform policy for coverage and reimbursement for products exists among third-party payors. Therefore, coverage and reimbursement for our products can differ significantly from payor to payor. The process for determining whether a payor will provide coverage for a product may be separate from the process for setting the reimbursement rate that the payor will pay for the product. One payor’s determination to provide coverage for a product does not assure that other payors will also provide coverage and reimbursement for the product. Third-party payors may also limit coverage to specific products on an approved list, or formulary, which might not include all of the FDA-approved products for a particular indication. We cannot be sure that coverage and reimbursement will be available for, or accurately estimate the potential revenue from, our product candidates.

A decision by a third-party payor not to cover or not to separately reimburse for our medical products or therapies using our products could reduce physician utilization of our products once approved. Assuming there is coverage for our product candidates, or therapies using our product candidates by a third-party payor, the resulting reimbursement payment rates may not be adequate or may require co-payments that patients find unacceptably high. We cannot be sure that coverage and reimbursement in the United States will be available for our current or future product candidates, or for any procedures using such product candidates, and any reimbursement that may become available may not be adequate or may be decreased or eliminated in the future.

Further, increasing efforts by third-party payors in the United States and abroad to cap or reduce healthcare costs may cause such organizations to limit both coverage and the level of reimbursement for newly approved products and, as a result, they may not cover or provide adequate payment for our product candidates. In order to secure coverage and reimbursement for any product that might be approved for sale, we may need to conduct expensive pharmacoeconomic studies in order to demonstrate the medical necessity and cost-effectiveness of our products, in addition to the costs required to obtain FDA or comparable regulatory approvals. Additionally, we may also need to provide discounts to purchasers, private health plans or government healthcare programs. Our product candidates may nonetheless not be considered medically necessary or cost-effective. If third-party payors do not consider a product to be cost-effective compared to other available therapies, they may not cover the product after approval as a benefit under their plans or, if they do, the level of payment may not be sufficient to allow a company to sell its products at a profit. We expect to experience pricing pressures from third-party payors in connection with the potential sale of any of our product candidates.

Governments outside the United States tend to impose strict price controls, which may adversely affect our revenues, if any.

In some foreign countries, the proposed pricing for a drug must be approved before it may be lawfully marketed. The requirements governing drug pricing vary widely from country to country. For example, in the European Union, member states can restrict the range of medicinal products for which their national health insurance systems provide reimbursement and they can control the prices of medicinal products for human use. To obtain reimbursement or pricing approval, some of these countries may require the completion of clinical trials that compare the cost effectiveness of a particular product candidate to currently available therapies. A member state may approve a specific price for the medicinal product or it may instead adopt a system of direct or indirect controls on the profitability of the company placing the medicinal product on the market. Approaches between member states are diverging. For example, in France, effective market access will be supported by agreements with hospitals and products may be reimbursed by the Social Security Fund. The price of reimbursed medicines is negotiated with the Economic Committee for Health Products, or CEPS. There can be no assurance that any country that has price controls or reimbursement limitations for biopharmaceutical products will allow favorable reimbursement and pricing arrangements for any of our product candidates. Historically, products launched in the European Union do not follow price structures of the United States and generally prices tend to be significantly lower.

Even if we obtain approval of any of our product candidates in the United States or Europe, we may never obtain approval or commercialize such products in other countries, which would limit our ability to realize their full market potential.

In order to market any products in the United States or Europe, we must establish and comply with numerous and varying regulatory requirements regarding safety and efficacy. Clinical trials conducted in one country may not be accepted by regulatory authorities in other countries, and regulatory approval in one country does not mean that regulatory approval will be obtained in any other country. Approval procedures vary among countries and can involve additional product testing and validation and additional administrative review periods. Seeking foreign regulatory approvals outside of where our clinical trials currently have been conducted could result in significant delays, difficulties and costs for us and may require additional preclinical studies or clinical trials which would be costly and time consuming. Regulatory requirements can vary widely from country to country and could delay or prevent the introduction of our products in those countries. Satisfying these and other regulatory requirements is costly, time consuming, uncertain and subject to unanticipated delays. In addition, our failure to obtain regulatory approval in any country may delay or have negative effects on the process for regulatory approval in other countries. We do not have any product candidates approved for sale in any jurisdiction, including international markets, and we do not have experience in obtaining regulatory approval in international markets. If we fail to comply with regulatory requirements in international markets or to obtain and maintain required approvals, our ability to realize the full market potential of our products will be harmed.

We currently have no marketing and sales organization and have no experience as a company in commercializing products, and we may have to invest significant resources to develop these capabilities. If we are unable to establish marketing and sales capabilities or enter into agreements with third parties to market and sell our product candidates, if approved, we may not be able to generate product revenue.

We have no internal sales, marketing or distribution capabilities, nor have we commercialized a product. If any of our product candidates ultimately receives regulatory approval, we expect to establish a marketing and sales organization with technical expertise and supporting distribution capabilities to commercialize each such product in major markets, which will be expensive and time consuming. We have no prior experience as a company in the marketing, sale and distribution of biopharmaceutical products and there are significant risks involved in building

and managing a sales organization, including our ability to hire, retain and incentivize qualified individuals, generate sufficient sales leads, provide adequate training to sales and marketing personnel and effectively manage a geographically dispersed sales and marketing team. Any failure or delay in the development of our internal sales, marketing and distribution capabilities would adversely impact the commercialization of these products. We may also choose to collaborate with third parties that have direct sales forces and established distribution systems, either to augment our own sales force and distribution systems or in lieu of our own sales force and distribution systems. We may not be able to enter into collaborations or hire consultants or external service providers to assist us in sales, marketing and distribution functions on acceptable financial terms, or at all. In addition, our product revenues and our profitability, if any, may be lower if we rely on third parties for these functions than if we were to market, sell and distribute any products that we develop ourselves. We likely will have little control over such third parties, and any of them may fail to devote the necessary resources and attention to sell and market our products effectively. If we are not successful in commercializing our products, either on our own or through arrangements with one or more third parties, we may not be able to generate any future product revenue and we would incur significant additional losses.

Risks Related to Ongoing Regulatory and Legal Compliance

Risks Related to Healthcare and Related Laws

Our relationships with healthcare providers and physicians and third-party payors will be subject to applicable anti-kickback, fraud and abuse and other healthcare laws and regulations, which could expose us to criminal sanctions, civil penalties, contractual damages, reputational harm and diminished profits and future earnings.

Although we do not currently have any products on the market, upon commercialization of our product candidates, if approved, we will be subject to additional health care statutory and regulatory requirements and oversight by federal and state governments in the United States as well as foreign governments in the jurisdictions in which we conduct our business. Healthcare providers, physicians and third-party payors in the United States and elsewhere will play a primary role in the recommendation and prescription of any product candidates for which we obtain marketing approval. Our current and future arrangements with healthcare providers, third-party payors, customers and others may expose us to broadly applicable fraud and abuse and other healthcare laws and regulations. In particular, the research of our product candidates, as well as the promotion, sales and marketing of healthcare items and services, as well as certain business arrangements in the healthcare industry, are subject to extensive laws designed to prevent fraud, kickbacks, self-dealing and other abusive practices. These laws and regulations may restrict or prohibit a wide range of pricing, discounting, marketing and promotion, structuring and commission(s), certain customer incentive programs and other business or financial arrangements.

The applicable federal, state and foreign healthcare laws and regulations laws that may affect our ability to operate include, but are not limited to:

•the federal Anti-Kickback Statute, which prohibits, among other things, persons and entities from knowingly and willfully soliciting, receiving, offering or paying any remuneration (including any kickback, bribe, or rebate), directly or indirectly, overtly or covertly, in cash or in kind, to induce or reward, or in return for, either the referral of an individual, or the purchase, lease, order, arrangement or recommendation of any good, facility, item or service for which payment may be made, in whole or in part, under a federal healthcare program, such as the Medicare and Medicaid programs. A person or entity can be found guilty of violating the statute without actual knowledge of the statute or specific intent to violate it. The term remuneration has been interpreted broadly to include anything of value. Further, courts have found that if “one purpose” of remuneration is to induce referrals, the federal Anti-Kickback statute is violated. The Anti-Kickback Statute has been interpreted to apply to arrangements between biopharmaceutical manufacturers on the one hand and prescribers, purchasers and formulary managers, among others, on the other. There are a number of statutory exceptions and regulatory safe harbors protecting some common activities from prosecution;

•the federal civil and criminal false claims laws, including the FCA, and civil monetary penalty laws which prohibit, among other things, individuals or entities from knowingly presenting, or causing to be presented, false, fictitious or fraudulent claims for payment to, or approval by Medicare, Medicaid, or other federal healthcare programs; knowingly making, using or causing to be made or used, a false record or statement material to a false, fictitious or fraudulent claim or an obligation to pay or transmit money or property to the federal government; or knowingly concealing or knowingly and improperly avoiding, decreasing or concealing an obligation to pay money to the federal government. In addition, a claim that includes items or services resulting from a violation of the federal Anti-Kickback Statute constitutes a false or fraudulent claim under the FCA. Manufacturers can be held liable under the FCA even when they do not submit claims

directly to government payors if they are deemed to “cause” the submission of false or fraudulent claims. The FCA also permits a private individual acting as a “whistleblower” to bring qui tam actions on behalf of the federal government alleging violations of the FCA and to share in any monetary recovery or settlement;

•the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, or HIPAA, which created additional federal criminal statutes that prohibit knowingly and willfully executing, or attempting to execute, a scheme to defraud any healthcare benefit program, including private third-party payors, or obtain, by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises, any of the money or property owned by, or under the custody or control of, any healthcare benefit program, regardless of the payor (e.g., public or private), and knowingly and willfully falsifying, concealing or covering up by any trick or device a material fact or making any materially false, fictitious or fraudulent statement or representation, or making or using any false writing or document knowing the same to contain any materially false fictitious or fraudulent statement or entry in connection with the delivery of, or payment for, healthcare benefits, items or services relating to healthcare matters. Similar to the federal Anti-Kickback Statute, a person or entity can be found guilty of violating HIPAA fraud provisions without actual knowledge of the statute or specific intent to violate it;

•the federal Physician Payments Sunshine Act and its implementing regulations, which require manufacturers of drugs, devices, biologics and medical supplies for which payment is available under Medicare, Medicaid or the Children’s Health Insurance Program (with certain exceptions) to report annually to CMS information related to direct or indirect payments and other transfers of value made to physicians (defined to include doctors, dentists, optometrists, podiatrists and chiropractors), certain non-physician providers including physician providers including physician assistants and nurse practitioners, and teaching hospitals, as well as ownership and investment interests held by the physicians and their immediate family members;

•federal consumer protection and unfair competition laws, which broadly regulate marketplace activities and activities that potentially harm consumers; and

•analogous U.S. state, local and foreign laws and regulations, such as state anti-kickback and false claims laws, which may apply to sales or marketing arrangements and claims involving healthcare items or services reimbursed by any third-party payor, including private insurers, and may be broader in scope than their federal equivalents; state and foreign laws that require biopharmaceutical companies to comply with the biopharmaceutical industry’s voluntary compliance guidelines and other relevant compliance guidance promulgated by the federal government or otherwise restrict payments that may be made to healthcare providers and other potential referral sources; and state and foreign laws that require drug manufacturers to report information related to payments and other transfers of value to physicians and other healthcare providers, marketing expenditures or drug pricing; state and local laws that require the registration of biopharmaceutical sales representatives.

The scope and enforcement of each of these laws is uncertain and subject to rapid change in the current environment of healthcare reform, especially in light of the lack of applicable precedent and regulations. Ensuring business arrangements comply with applicable healthcare laws, as well as responding to possible investigations by government authorities, can be time- and resource-consuming and can divert a company’s attention from the business. Efforts to ensure that our business arrangements with third parties will comply with applicable healthcare laws and regulations will involve substantial costs. Any action against us for violation of these laws, even if we successfully defend against it, could cause us to incur significant legal expenses and divert our management’s attention from the operation of our business. The shifting compliance environment and the need to build and maintain robust and expandable systems to comply with multiple jurisdictions with different compliance or reporting requirements increases the possibility that a healthcare company may run afoul of one or more of the requirements.

It is possible that governmental and enforcement authorities will conclude that our business practices, including our arrangements with physicians and other healthcare providers, some of whom may receive stock options as compensation for services provided, may not comply with current or future statutes, regulations or case law interpreting applicable fraud and abuse or other healthcare laws and regulations. If our operations are found to be in violation of any of the laws described above or any other government regulations that apply to us, we may be subject to significant sanctions, including civil, criminal and administrative penalties, damages, fines, disgorgement, imprisonment, reputational harm, exclusion from participation in federal and state funded healthcare programs, contractual damages and the curtailment or restricting of our operations, as well as additional reporting obligations and oversight if we become subject to a corporate integrity agreement or other agreement to resolve allegations of non-compliance with these laws.

Further, if any of the physicians or other healthcare providers or entities with whom we expect to do business are found to be not in compliance with applicable laws, they may be subject to similar penalties. Any action for violation of these laws, even if successfully defended, could cause us to incur significant legal expenses and divert management’s attention from the operation of the business. In addition, the approval and commercialization of any product candidate we develop outside the United States will also likely subject us to foreign equivalents of the healthcare laws mentioned above, among other foreign laws. All of these could harm our ability to operate our business and our financial results.

Efforts to ensure that our business arrangements with third parties will comply with applicable healthcare laws and regulations will involve substantial costs. Any action against us for violation of these laws, even if we successfully defend against it, could cause us to incur significant legal expenses and divert our management’s attention from the operation of our business. The shifting compliance environment and the need to build and maintain robust and expandable systems to comply with multiple jurisdictions with different compliance or reporting requirements increases the possibility that a healthcare company may run afoul of one or more of the requirements.

We may be subject to, or may in the future become subject to, U.S. federal and state, and foreign laws and regulations imposing obligations on how we collect, use, disclose, store and process personal information. Our actual or perceived failure to comply with such obligations could result in liability or reputational harm and could harm our business. Ensuring compliance with such laws could also impair our efforts to maintain and expand our customer base, and thereby decrease our revenue.

The global data protection landscape is rapidly evolving, and we are or may become subject to numerous state, federal and foreign laws, requirements and regulations governing the collection, use, disclosure, retention, and security of personal information, such as information that we may collect in connection with clinical trials in the United States and abroad. Implementation standards and enforcement practices are likely to remain uncertain for the foreseeable future, and we cannot yet determine the impact future laws, regulations, standards, or perception of their requirements may have on our business. This evolution may create uncertainty in our business, affect our ability to operate in certain jurisdictions or to collect, store, transfer use and share personal information, necessitate the acceptance of more onerous obligations in our contracts, result in liability or impose additional costs on us. The cost of compliance with these laws, regulations and standards is high and is likely to increase in the future. Any failure or perceived failure by us to comply with federal, state or foreign laws or regulation, our internal policies and procedures or our contracts governing our processing of personal information could result in negative publicity, government investigations and enforcement actions, claims by third parties and damage to our reputation, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our operations, financial performance and business.

In Europe, the General Data Protection Regulation, or GDPR, took effect in May 2018. The GDPR imposes stringent requirements on entities that process personal data of individuals in the European Economic Area, or EEA. These requirements include, for example, establishing a legal basis for processing, providing notice to data subjects about how personal data is collected and processed, developing procedures to vindicate expanded data subject rights, implementing appropriate technical and organizational measures to safeguard personal data, introducing the obligation to notify data protection regulators or supervisory authorities (and in certain cases, affected individuals) of significant data breaches, imposing limitations on retention of personal data, maintaining a record of data processing and complying with the principal of accountability and the obligation to demonstrate compliance through policies, procedures, training and audit. In addition, the GDPR establishes obligations for entities that process “special categories” of personal data, such as health data. Nearly all clinical trials involve the processing of these “special categories” of personal data, and processing of personal data collected during the course of clinical trials is therefore subject to heightened protections under the GDPR. Violations of the GDPR can lead to potential fines of up to €20 million or 4% of the annual global revenues of the noncompliant undertaking, whichever is greater. In addition to the foregoing, a breach of the GDPR could result in regulatory investigations, reputational damage, orders to cease / change our processing of our data, enforcement notices, and/ or assessment notices (for a compulsory audit). We may also face civil claims including representative actions and other class action type litigation (where individuals have suffered harm), potentially amounting to significant compensation or damages liabilities, as well as associated costs, diversion of internal resources, and reputational harm.

Among other requirements, the GDPR regulates transfers of personal data subject to the GDPR to third countries that have not been found to provide adequate protection to such personal data, including the United States, and the efficacy and longevity of current transfer mechanisms between the European Union and the United States remains uncertain. For example, in 2016, the European Union and United States agreed to a transfer framework for data transferred from the European Union to the United States called the Privacy Shield, but in July 2020 the Court of Justice of the EU, or the CJEU, limited how organizations could lawfully transfer personal data from the EEA to the United States by invalidating the Privacy Shield for purposes of international transfers and

imposing further restrictions on use of the standard contractual clauses, or SCCs. While the CJEU upheld the adequacy of the SCCs, it made clear that reliance on them alone may not necessarily be sufficient in all circumstances. Use of the SCCs must now be assessed on a case-by-case basis taking into account the legal regime applicable in the destination country, in particular applicable surveillance laws and rights of individuals and additional measures and/or contractual provisions may need to be put in place, however, the nature of these additional measures is currently uncertain. The CJEU went on to state that if a competent supervisory authority believes that the SCCs cannot be complied with in the destination country and the required level of protection cannot be secured by other means, such supervisory authority is under an obligation to suspend or prohibit that transfer. The European Commission issued revised SCCs on June 4, 2021 to account for the decision of the CJEU and recommendations made by the European Data Protection Board. The revised SCCs must be used for relevant new data transfers from September 27, 2021; existing standard contractual clauses arrangements must be migrated to the revised clauses by December 27, 2022. There is some uncertainty around whether the revised clauses can be used for all types of data transfers, particularly whether they can be relied on for data transfers to non-EEA entities subject to the GDPR. The revised SCCs apply only to the transfer of personal data outside of the EEA and not the United Kingdom; the UK’s Information Commissioner’s Office launched a public consultation on its draft revised data transfers mechanisms in August 2021. As supervisory authorities issue further guidance on personal data export mechanisms, including circumstances where the SCCs cannot be used, and/or start taking enforcement action, we could suffer additional costs, complaints and/or regulatory investigations or fines, and/or if we are otherwise unable to transfer personal data between and among countries and regions in which we operate, it could affect the manner in which we provide our services, the geographical location or segregation of our relevant systems and operations, and could adversely affect our financial results.

Further, since January 2021, we may also be subject to the UK GDPR, which, together with the UK Data Protection Act 2018, retains the GDPR in UK national law. The UK GDPR mirrors the fines under the GDPR, meaning the potential of parallel fines of up to the greater of £17.5 million or 4% of global turnover. The European Commission has adopted an adequacy decision in favor of the United Kingdom, enabling data transfers from EU member states to the United Kingdom without additional safeguards. However, the UK adequacy decision will automatically expire in June 2025 unless the European Commission re-assesses and renews/ extends that decision and remains under review by the Commission during this period. In September 2021, the UK government launched a consultation on its proposals for wide-ranging reform of UK data protection laws following Brexit. There is a risk that any material changes which are made to the UK data protection regime could result in the European Commission reviewing the UK adequacy decision, and the United Kingdom losing its adequacy decision if the European Commission deems the UK to no longer provide adequate protection for personal data. The relationship between the United Kingdom and the European Union in relation to certain aspects of data protection law remains uncertain, and it is unclear how UK data protection laws and regulations will develop in the medium to longer term.

In the United States, HIPAA establishes a set of national privacy and security standards for the protection of individually identifiable health information, including protected health information, or PHI, by health plans, certain health care clearinghouses and health care providers that submit certain covered transactions electronically, or covered entities, and their “business associates,” which are persons or entities that perform certain services for, or on behalf of, a covered entity that involve creating, receiving, maintaining or transmitting PHI, as well as their covered subcontractors. While we do not believe that we are currently acting as a covered entity or business associate under HIPAA, we may receive individually identifiable health information from these entities. Failure to receive this information properly could subject us to HIPAA’s criminal penalties, which may include fines up to $250,000 per violation and/or imprisonment. Further, any person may be prosecuted under HIPAA’s criminal provisions either directly or under aiding-and-abetting or conspiracy principles. Depending on the facts and circumstances, we could face substantial criminal penalties if we knowingly receive individually identifiable health information from a HIPAA-covered healthcare provider or research institution that has not satisfied HIPAA’s requirements for disclosure of individually identifiable health information. In addition, responding to government investigations regarding alleged violations of these and other laws and regulations, even if ultimately concluded with no findings of violations or no penalties imposed, can consume company resources and impact our business and, if public, harm our reputation.

Various states, such as California and Massachusetts, have also implemented similar privacy laws and regulations, such as the California Confidentiality of Medical Information Act, or the CMIA, that impose restrictive requirements regulating the use and disclosure of health information and other personally identifiable information. In addition to imposing fines and penalties, some of these state laws afford private rights of action to individuals who believe their personal information has been misused. California’s patient privacy laws, for example, provide for penalties of up to $250,000 and permit injured parties to sue for damages. In addition to the CMIA, California also recently enacted the California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018, or CCPA, which came into effect on January 1, 2020.

The CCPA creates individual privacy rights for California consumers and increases the privacy and security obligations of entities handling certain personal information. The CCPA provides for civil penalties for violations, as well as a private right of action for data breaches that is expected to increase data breach litigation. The CCPA may increase our compliance costs and potential liability, and many similar laws have been proposed at the federal level and in other states. Further, the California Privacy Rights Act, or CPRA, recently passed in California. The CPRA will impose additional data protection obligations on covered businesses, including additional consumer rights processes, limitations on data uses, new audit requirements for higher risk data, and opt outs for certain uses of sensitive data. It will also create a new California data protection agency authorized to issue substantive regulations and could result in increased privacy and information security enforcement. The majority of the provisions will go into effect on January 1, 2023, and additional compliance investment and potential business process changes may be required. In the event that we are subject to or affected by the CCPA, the CPRA or other domestic privacy and data protection laws, any liability from failure to comply with the requirements of these laws could adversely affect our financial condition.

Furthermore, the Federal Trade Commission, or the FTC, and many state Attorneys General continue to enforce federal and state consumer protection laws against companies for online collection, use, dissemination and security practices that appear to be unfair or deceptive. For example, according to the FTC, failing to take appropriate steps to keep consumers’ personal information secure can constitute unfair acts or practices in or affecting commerce in violation of Section 5(a) of the Federal Trade Commission Act. The FTC expects a company’s data security measures to be reasonable and appropriate in light of the sensitivity and volume of consumer information it holds, the size and complexity of its business, and the cost of available tools to improve security and reduce vulnerabilities.

The interplay of federal and state laws may be subject to varying interpretations by courts and government agencies, creating complex compliance issues for us and potentially exposing us to additional expense, adverse publicity and liability. Further, as regulatory focus on privacy issues continues to increase and laws and regulations concerning the protection of personal information expand and become more complex, these potential risks to our business could intensify. The legislative and regulatory landscape for privacy and data security continues to evolve, and there has been an increasing focus on privacy and data security issues which may affect our business. Any failure or perceived failure by us or our employees, representatives, contractors, consultants, collaborators, or other third parties to comply with current and future laws and regulations could result in government enforcement actions (including the imposition of significant penalties), criminal and/or civil liability for us and our officers and directors, private litigation and/or adverse publicity that negatively affects our business.

Ongoing healthcare legislative and regulatory reform measures may have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

In the United States and in some foreign jurisdictions, there have been, and likely will continue to be, a number of legislative initiatives and regulatory changes regarding the healthcare system directed at broadening the availability of healthcare, improving the quality of healthcare, and containing or lowering the cost of healthcare. For example, in March 2010, the ACA was enacted, which substantially changed the way health care is financed by both governmental and private insurers, and significantly impacted the U.S. biopharmaceutical industry. The ACA, among other things, subjects biological products to potential competition by lower-cost biosimilars, expands the types of entities eligible for the 340B drug discount program; introduced a new methodology by which rebates owed by manufacturers under the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program are calculated for drugs that are inhaled, infused, instilled, implanted or injected; increased the minimum Medicaid rebates owed by manufacturers under the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program and extended the rebate program to individuals enrolled in Medicaid managed care organizations; established annual fees and taxes on manufacturers of certain branded prescription drugs; and created a new Medicare Part D coverage gap discount program, in which manufacturers must agree to offer 50% (increased to 70% pursuant to the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018, or BBA, effective as of January 2019) point-of-sale discounts off negotiated prices of applicable brand drugs to eligible beneficiaries during their coverage gap period, as a condition for the manufacturer’s outpatient drugs to be covered under Medicare Part D.

Since its enactment, there have been numerous judicial, administrative, executive and legislative challenges to certain aspects of the ACA. On June 17, 2021 the U.S. Supreme Court dismissed the recent judicial challenge to the ACA brought by several states without specifically ruling on the constitutionality of the ACA. Thus, the ACA will remain in effect in its current form. Further, prior to the U.S. Supreme Court ruling, President Biden issued an executive order to initiate a special enrollment period from February 15, 2021 through August 15, 2021 for purposes of obtaining health insurance coverage through the ACA marketplace. The executive order also instructed certain governmental agencies to review and reconsider their existing policies and rules that limit access to healthcare, including among others, reexamining Medicaid demonstration projects and waiver programs that include work

requirements, and policies that create unnecessary barriers to obtaining access to health insurance coverage through Medicaid or the ACA.

In addition, other legislative changes have been proposed and adopted in the United States since the ACA was enacted. For example, on August 2, 2011, the Budget Control Act of 2011, among other things, included aggregate reductions of Medicare payments to providers of 2% per fiscal year. These reductions went into effect on April 1, 2013 and, due to subsequent legislative amendments to the statute, will remain in effect through 2030, with the exception of a temporary suspension from May 1, 2020 through March 31, 2022, unless additional Congressional action is taken. On January 2, 2013, the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 was signed into law, which, among other things, further reduced Medicare payments to several types of providers, including hospitals and cancer treatment centers, and increased the statute of limitations period for the government to recover overpayments to providers from three to five years.

Moreover, on March 11, 2021, President Biden signed the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 into law, which eliminates the statutory Medicaid drug rebate cap, currently set at 100% of a drug’s AMP, for single source and innovator multiple source drugs, beginning January 1, 2024. Payment methodologies may also be subject to changes in healthcare legislation and regulatory initiatives. For example, CMS may develop new payment and delivery models, such as bundled payment models. Recently, there has been heightened governmental scrutiny over the manner in which manufacturers set prices for their products. Such scrutiny has resulted in several recent U.S. Congressional inquiries and proposed and enacted federal and state legislation designed to, among other things, bring more transparency to drug pricing, reduce the cost of prescription drugs under Medicare, review the relationship between pricing and manufacturer patient programs, and reform government program reimbursement methodologies for drugs.

At the state level in the United States, legislatures are increasingly passing legislation and implementing regulations designed to control pharmaceutical and biologic product pricing, including price or patient reimbursement constraints, discounts, restrictions on certain product access and marketing cost disclosure and transparency measures, and, in some cases, designed to encourage importation from other countries and bulk purchasing. Legally mandated price controls on payment amounts by third-party payors or other restrictions on coverage or access could harm our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects. In addition, regional healthcare authorities and individual hospitals are increasingly using bidding procedures to determine what pharmaceutical products and which suppliers will be included in their prescription drug and other healthcare programs. This could reduce the ultimate demand for our product candidates that we successfully commercialize or put pressure on our product pricing.

We cannot predict the likelihood, nature or extent of government regulation that may arise from future legislation or administrative action in the United States or in any other jurisdictions. If we or any third parties we may engage are slow or unable to adapt to changes in existing requirements or the adoption of new requirements or policies, or if we or such third parties are not able to maintain regulatory compliance, our product candidates may lose any regulatory approval that may have been obtained and we may not achieve or sustain profitability.

In the United States, inadequate funding for the FDA, the SEC, and other government agencies could hinder their ability to hire and retain key leadership and other personnel, prevent new products and services from being developed or commercialized in a timely manner or otherwise prevent those agencies from performing normal business functions on which the operation of our business may rely, which could negatively impact our business.

The ability of the FDA to review and approve new products can be affected by a variety of factors, including government budget and funding levels, ability to hire and retain key personnel and accept the payment of user fees, and statutory, regulatory and policy changes. Average review times at the agency have fluctuated in recent years as a result. In addition, government funding of the SEC and other government agencies on which our operations may rely, including those that fund research and development activities, is subject to the political process, which is inherently fluid and unpredictable. In addition, government funding of other government agencies that fund research and development activities is subject to the political process, which is inherently fluid and unpredictable. Disruptions at the FDA and other agencies may also slow the time necessary for new drugs and or modifications to approved drugs or to be reviewed and/or approved by necessary government agencies, which would adversely affect our business. For example, over the last several years, the U.S. government has shut down several times and certain regulatory agencies, such as the FDA, have had to furlough critical FDA employees and stop critical activities.

Separately, in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, in March 2020, the FDA announced its intention to postpone most inspections of foreign manufacturing facilities, and on March 18, 2020, the FDA temporarily postponed routine surveillance inspections of domestic manufacturing facilities. Subsequently, in July 2020, the FDA

resumed certain on-site inspections of domestic manufacturing facilities subject to a risk-based prioritization system. The FDA utilized this risk-based assessment system to assist in determining when and where it was safest to conduct prioritized domestic inspections. Additionally, on April 15, 2021, the FDA issued a guidance document in which the FDA described its plans to conduct voluntary remote interactive evaluations of certain drug manufacturing facilities and clinical research sites, among other facilities. According to the guidance, the FDA may request such remote interactive evaluations where the FDA determines thatremote evaluation would be appropriate based on mission needs and travel limitations. In May 2021, the FDA outlined a detailed plan to move toward a more consistent state of inspectional operations, and in July 2021, the FDA resumed standard inspectional operations of domestic facilities and was continuing to maintain this level of operation as of September 2021.Regulatory authorities outside the United States may adopt similar restrictions or other policy measures in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. If a prolonged government shutdown occurs, or if global health concerns continue to hinder or prevent the FDA or other regulatory authorities from conducting their regular inspections, reviews, or other regulatory activities, it could significantly impact the ability of the FDA or other regulatory authorities to timely review and process our regulatory submissions, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Risks Related to International Regulations

EU drug marketing and reimbursement regulations may materially affect our ability to market and receive coverage for our products in the European member states.

We ultimately intend to seek approval to market our product candidates in both the United States and in selected foreign jurisdictions. If we obtain approval in one or more foreign jurisdictions for our product candidates, we will be subject to rules and regulations in those jurisdictions. In some foreign countries, particularly those in the EU, the pricing of drugs is subject to governmental control and other market regulations which could put pressure on the pricing and usage of our product candidates. In these countries, pricing negotiations with governmental authorities can take considerable time after obtaining marketing approval of a product candidate. In addition, market acceptance and sales of our product candidates will depend significantly on the availability of adequate coverage and reimbursement from third-party payors for our product candidates and may be affected by existing and future health care reform measures.

Much like the federal Anti-Kickback Statute prohibition in the United States, the provision of benefits or advantages to physicians to induce or encourage the prescription, recommendation, endorsement, purchase, supply, order or use of medicinal products is also prohibited in the European Union. The provision of benefits or advantages to physicians is governed by the national laws of EU member states, and in respect of the United Kingdom (which is longer a member of the European Union), the U.K. Bribery Act of 2010. Infringement of these laws could result in substantial fines and imprisonment.

Payments made to physicians in certain EU member states must be publicly disclosed. Moreover, agreements with physicians must often be subject to a prior notification and/or approval by the physician’s employer, his or her competent professional organization and/or the regulatory authorities of the individual EU member states. These requirements are provided in the national laws, industry codes or professional codes of conduct, applicable in the EU member states. Failure to comply with these requirements could result in reputational risk, public reprimands, administrative penalties, fines or imprisonment.

In addition, the requirements governing drug pricing and reimbursement vary widely from country to country. For example, the European Union provides options for its member states to restrict the range of medicinal products for which their national health insurance systems provide reimbursement and to control the prices of medicinal products for human use. Reference pricing used by various EU member states and parallel distribution, or arbitrage between low-priced and high-priced member states, can further reduce prices. A member state may approve a specific price for the medicinal product or it may instead adopt a system of direct or indirect controls on the profitability of the company placing the medicinal product on the market. In some countries, we may be required to conduct a clinical study or other studies that compare the cost-effectiveness of any of our product candidates to other available therapies in order to obtain or maintain reimbursement or pricing approval. There can be no assurance that any country that has price controls or reimbursement limitations for biopharmaceutical products will allow favorable reimbursement and pricing arrangements for any of our products. Historically, products launched in the European Union do not follow price structures of the United States and generally prices tend to be significantly lower. Publication of discounts by third-party payors or authorities may lead to further pressure on the prices or reimbursement levels within the country of publication and other countries. If pricing is set at unsatisfactory levels or if reimbursement of our products is unavailable or limited in scope or amount, our revenues from sales and the potential profitability of any of our product candidates in those countries would be negatively affected.

Legal, political and economic uncertainty surrounding the exit of the United Kingdom from the European Union may be a source of instability in international markets, create significant currency fluctuations, adversely affect our operations in the United Kingdom and pose additional risks to our business, revenue, financial condition and results of operations.

On June 23, 2016, the United Kingdom held a referendum in which a majority of the eligible members of the electorate voted to leave the European Union, commonly referred to as Brexit. Pursuant to Article 50 of the Treaty on EU, the United Kingdom ceased being an EU member state on January 31, 2020. Under the terms of its departure, the United Kingdom entered a transition period, or the Transition Period, during which it continued to follow all EU rules, which ended on December 31, 2020. On December 30, 2020, the United Kingdom and European Union signed the Trade and Cooperation Agreement, or TCA, which includes an agreement on free trade between the two parties and has been provisionally applicable since January 1,2021. Since January 1, 2021, the United Kingdom. has operated under a separate regulatory regime to the European Union. EU laws regarding medicinal products only apply in respect of the United Kingdom to Northern Ireland (as set out in the Protocol on Ireland/Northern Ireland). The EU laws that have been transposed into U.K. law through secondary legislation remain applicable. While the United Kingdom has indicated a general intention that new laws regarding the development, manufacture and commercialization of medicinal products in the United Kingdom will align closely with EU law, there are limited detailed proposals for future regulation of medicinal products. The TCA includes specific provisions concerning medicinal products, which include the mutual recognition of Good Manufacturing Practice, or GMP, inspections of manufacturing facilities for medicinal products and GMP documents issued (such mutual recognition can be rejected by either party in certain circumstances), but does not foresee wholesale mutual recognition of U.K. and EU pharmaceutical regulations. Therefore, there remains political and economic uncertainty regarding to what extent the regulation of medicinal products will differ between the United Kingdom and the EU in the future. Any divergences will increase the cost and complexity of running our business, including with respect to the conduct of clinical trials. Since a significant proportion of the regulatory framework in the United Kingdom applicable to our business and our drug candidates is derived from EU directives and regulations, Brexit could materially impact the regulatory regime with respect to the development, manufacture, importation, approval and commercialization of our drug candidates in the United Kingdom or the European Union. Great Britain is no longer covered by the European Union’s procedures for the grant of marketing authorizations (Northern Ireland is covered by the centralized authorization procedure and can be covered under the decentralized or mutual recognition procedures). A separate marketing authorization will be required to market drugs in Great Britain. It is also currently unclear whether the U.K. regulator, the Medicines and Healthcare Products regulatory Agency, is sufficiently prepared to handle the increased volume of marketing authorization applications that it is likely to receive. Any delay in obtaining, or an inability to obtain, any marketing approvals, as a result of Brexit or otherwise, could prevent us and our collaborators or delay us and our collaborators from commercializing our drug candidates in the United Kingdom and/or the EEA and restrict our ability to generate revenue and achieve and sustain profitability.

The uncertainty concerning the United Kingdom’s legal, political and economic relationship with the European Union after Brexit may be a source of instability in the international markets, create significant currency fluctuations and/or otherwise adversely affect trading agreements or similar cross-border co-operation arrangements (whether economic, tax, fiscal, legal, regulatory or otherwise) beyond the date of Brexit.

These developments, or the perception that any of them could occur, may have a significant adverse effect on global economic conditions and the stability of global financial markets, and could significantly reduce global market liquidity and limit the ability of key market participants to operate in certain financial markets. In particular, it could also lead to a period of considerable uncertainty in relation to the U.K. financial and banking markets, as well as on the regulatory process in Europe. Asset valuations, currency exchange rates and credit ratings may also be subject to increased market volatility.

Such a withdrawal from the European Union is unprecedented, and it is unclear how the United Kingdom’s access to the European single market for goods, capital, services and labor within the European Union, or single market, and the wider commercial, legal and regulatory environment, will impact our current and future operations (including business activities conducted by third parties and contract manufacturers on our behalf) and clinical activities in the United Kingdom.

Additional laws and regulations governing international operations could negatively impact or restrict our operations.

For our operations outside of the United States, we must dedicate additional resources to comply with numerous laws and regulations in each jurisdiction in which we plan to operate. The U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, or the FCPA, prohibits any U.S. individual or business entity from paying, offering, authorizing payment or offering of anything of value, directly or indirectly, to any foreign official, political party or candidate for the purpose of

influencing any act or decision of the foreign entity in order to assist the individual or business in obtaining or retaining business. The FCPA also obligates companies whose securities are listed in the United States to comply with certain accounting provisions requiring the company to maintain books and records that accurately and fairly reflect all transactions of the corporation, including international subsidiaries, and to devise and maintain an adequate system of internal accounting controls for international operations.

Compliance with the FCPA is expensive and difficult, particularly in countries in which corruption is a recognized problem. In addition, the FCPA presents particular challenges in the biopharmaceutical industry, because, in many countries, hospitals are operated by the government, and doctors and other hospital employees are considered foreign officials. Certain payments to hospitals and healthcare providers in connection with clinical trials and other work have been deemed to be improper payments to government officials and have led to FCPA enforcement actions. Recently the SEC and Department of Justice have increased their FCPA enforcement activities with respect to biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies. There is no certainty that all of our employees, agents or contractors, or those of our affiliates, will comply with all applicable laws and regulations, particularly given the high level of complexity of these laws.

Various laws, regulations and executive orders also restrict the use and dissemination outside of the United States, or the sharing with certain non-U.S. nationals, of information products classified for national security purposes, as well as certain products, technology and technical data relating to those products. If we continue and expand our presence outside of the United States, it will require us to dedicate additional resources to comply with these laws, and these laws may preclude us from developing, manufacturing, or selling certain products and product candidates outside of the United States, which could limit our growth potential and increase our development costs.

Violations of these laws and regulations could result in fines, criminal sanctions against us, our officers or our employees, the closing down of our facilities, requirements to obtain export licenses, cessation of business activities in sanctioned countries, implementation of compliance programs and prohibitions on the conduct of our business. Any such violations could include prohibitions on our ability to offer our products, if approved, in one or more countries and could materially damage our reputation, our brand, our international expansion efforts, our ability to attract and retain employees and our business, prospects, operating results and financial condition. The SEC also may suspend or bar issuers from trading securities on U.S. exchanges for violations of the FCPA’s accounting provisions.

If we fail to comply with environmental, health and safety laws and regulations, we could become subject to fines or penalties or incur costs that could harm our business.

We are subject to numerous environmental, health and safety laws and regulations, including those governing laboratory procedures and the handling, use, storage, treatment and disposal of hazardous materials and wastes. From time to time and in the future, our operations may involve the use of hazardous and flammable materials, including chemicals and biological materials, and may also produce hazardous waste products. Even if we contract with third parties for the disposal of these materials and waste products, we cannot completely eliminate the risk of contamination or injury resulting from these materials. In the event of contamination or injury resulting from the use or disposal of our hazardous materials, we could be held liable for any resulting damages, and any liability could exceed our resources. We also could incur significant costs associated with civil or criminal fines and penalties for failure to comply with such laws and regulations.

We maintain workers’ compensation insurance to cover us for costs and expenses we may incur due to injuries to our employees, but this insurance may not provide adequate coverage against potential liabilities. However, we do not maintain insurance for environmental liability or toxic tort claims that may be asserted against us.

In addition, we may incur substantial costs in order to comply with current or future environmental, health and safety laws and regulations. Environmental laws and regulations may impair our research, development or production efforts. In addition, failure to comply with these laws and regulations may result in substantial fines, penalties or other sanctions.

Risks Related to Our Intellectual Property

Risks Related to Licensed Intellectual Property

Our success depends in part on our ability to protect our intellectual property. It is difficult and costly to protect our proprietary rights and technology, and we may not be able to ensure their protection.

Our business will depend in large part on obtaining and maintaining patent, trademark and trade secret protection of our proprietary technologies and our product candidates, their respective components, synthetic intermediates, formulations, combination therapies and methods used to manufacture them and methods of treatment, as well as successfully defending these patents against third-party challenges. Our ability to stop unauthorized third parties from making, using, selling, offering to sell or importing our product candidates is dependent upon the extent to which we have rights under valid and enforceable patents that cover these activities and whether a court would issue an injunctive remedy. If we are unable to secure and maintain patent protection for any product or technology we develop, or if the scope of the patent protection secured is not sufficiently broad, our competitors could develop and commercialize products and technology similar or identical to ours, and our ability to commercialize any product candidates we may develop may be adversely affected.

The patenting process is expensive and time-consuming, and we may not be able to file and prosecute all necessary or desirable patent applications at a reasonable cost or in a timely manner. In addition, we may not pursue, obtain, or maintain patent protection in all relevant markets. It is also possible that we will fail to identify patentable aspects of our research and development output before it is too late to obtain patent protection. Moreover, in some circumstances, we may not have the right to control the preparation, filing and prosecution of patent applications, or to maintain the patents, covering technology that we license from or license to third parties and are reliant on our licensors or licensees.

The strength of patents in the biotechnology and biopharmaceutical field involves complex legal and scientific questions and can be uncertain. The patent applications that we own or in-license may fail to result in issued patents with claims that cover our product candidates or uses thereof in the United States or in other foreign countries. Even if the patents do successfully issue, third parties may challenge the validity, enforceability or scope thereof, which may result in such patents being narrowed, invalidated or held unenforceable. Furthermore, even if they are unchallenged, our patents and patent applications may not adequately protect our technology, including our product candidates, or prevent others from designing around our claims. If the breadth or strength of protection provided by the patent applications we hold with respect to our product candidates is threatened, it could dissuade companies from collaborating with us to develop, and threaten our ability to commercialize, our product candidates. Further, if we encounter delays in our clinical trials, the period of time during which we could market our product candidates under patent protection would be reduced.

We cannot be certain that we were the first to file any patent application related to our technology, including our product candidates, and, if we were not, we may be precluded from obtaining patent protection for our technology, including our product candidates.

We cannot be certain that we are the first to invent the inventions covered by pending patent applications and, if we are not, we may be subject to priority disputes. Furthermore, for United States applications in which all claims are entitled to a priority date before March 16, 2013, an interference proceeding can be provoked by a third-party or instituted by the United States Patent and Trademark Office, or USPTO, to determine who was the first to invent any of the subject matter covered by the patent claims of our applications. Similarly, for United States applications in which at least one claim is not entitled to a priority date before March 16, 2013, derivation proceedings can be instituted to determine whether the subject matter of a patent claim was derived from a prior inventor’s disclosure.

We may be required to disclaim part or all of the term of certain patents or all of the term of certain patent applications. There may be prior art of which we are not aware that may affect the validity or enforceability of a patent or patent application claim. There also may be prior art of which we are aware, but which we do not believe affects the validity or enforceability of a claim, which may, nonetheless, ultimately be found to affect the validity or enforceability of a claim. No assurance can be given that if challenged, our patents would be declared by a court to be valid or enforceable or that even if found valid and enforceable, would adequately protect our product candidates, or would be found by a court to be infringed by a competitor’s technology or product. We may analyze patents or patent applications of our competitors that we believe are relevant to our activities, and consider that we are free to operate in relation to our product candidates, but our competitors may achieve issued claims, including in patents we consider to be unrelated, which block our efforts or may potentially result in our product candidates or our activities infringing such claims. The possibility exists that others will develop products which have the same effect as our products on an independent basis which do not infringe our patents or other intellectual property rights, or will design around the claims of patents that may issue that cover our products.

Recent or future patent reform legislation could increase the uncertainties and costs surrounding the prosecution of our patent applications and the enforcement or defense of our issued patents. Under the enacted Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, or America Invents Act, enacted in 2013, the United States moved from a “first to invent” to a “first-to-file” system. Under a “first-to-file” system, assuming the other requirements for patentability are met, the first inventor to file a patent application generally will be entitled to a patent on the invention regardless of

whether another inventor had made the invention earlier. The America Invents Act includes a number of other significant changes to U.S. patent law, including provisions that affect the way patent applications are prosecuted, redefine prior art and establish a new post-grant review system. The effects of these changes are currently unclear as the USPTO only recently developed new regulations and procedures in connection with the America Invents Act and many of the substantive changes to patent law, including the “first-to-file” provisions, only became effective in March 2013. In addition, the courts have yet to address many of these provisions and the applicability of the act and new regulations on specific patents discussed herein have not been determined and would need to be reviewed. However, the America Invents Act and its implementation could increase the uncertainties and costs surrounding the prosecution of our patent applications and the enforcement or defense of our issued patents, all of which could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.

The degree of future protection for our proprietary rights is uncertain because legal means afford only limited protection and may not adequately protect our rights or permit us to gain or keep our competitive advantage. For example:

•others may be able to make or use compounds that are similar to the compositions of our product candidates but that are not covered by the claims of our patents or those of our licensors;

•we or our licensors, as the case may be, may fail to meet our obligations to the U.S. government in regards to any in-licensed patents and patent applications funded by U.S. government grants, leading to the loss of patent rights;

•we or our licensors, as the case may be, might not have been the first to file patent applications for these inventions;

•others may independently develop similar or alternative technologies;

•it is possible that our pending patent applications will not result in issued patents;

•it is possible that there are prior public disclosures that could invalidate our or our licensors’ patents, as the case may be, or parts of our or their patents;

•it is possible that others may circumvent our owned or in-licensed patents;

•it is possible that there are unpublished applications or patent applications maintained in secrecy that may later issue with claims covering our products or technology similar to ours;

•the laws of foreign countries may not protect our or our licensors’, as the case may be, proprietary rights to the same extent as the laws of the United States;

•the claims of our owned or in-licensed issued patents or patent applications, if and when issued, may not cover our product candidates;

•our owned or in-licensed issued patents may not provide us with any competitive advantages, may be narrowed in scope, or be held invalid or unenforceable as a result of legal challenges by third parties;

•the inventors of our owned or in-licensed patents or patent applications may become involved with competitors, develop products or processes which design around our patents or become hostile to us or the patents or patent applications on which they are named as inventors;

•it is possible that our owned or in-licensed patents or patent applications omit individual(s) that should be listed as inventor(s) or include individual(s) that should not be listed as inventor(s), which may cause these patents or patents issuing from these patent applications to be held invalid or unenforceable;

•we have engaged in scientific collaborations in the past, and will continue to do so in the future. Such collaborators may develop adjacent or competing products to ours that are outside the scope of our patents;

•we may not develop additional proprietary technologies for which we can obtain patent protection;

•it is possible that product candidates or diagnostic tests we develop may be covered by third parties’ patents or other exclusive rights; or

•the patents of others may have an adverse effect on our business.

Risks Related to License and Collaboration Agreements

We have entered into, and may enter into, license or other collaboration agreements that impose certain obligations on us. If we fail to comply with our obligations under such agreements with third parties, we could lose rights that may be important to our business.

In connection with our efforts to expand our pipeline of product candidates, we have entered into and may further enter into certain licenses or other collaboration agreements in the future pertaining to the in-license of rights to additional candidates. Such agreements may impose various diligence, milestone payment, royalty, insurance or other obligations on us. If we fail to comply with these obligations, our licensor or collaboration partners may have the right to terminate the relevant agreement, in which event we would not be able to develop or market the products covered by such licensed intellectual property, or to pursue other remedies.

Moreover, disputes may arise regarding intellectual property subject to a licensing agreement, including:

•the scope of rights granted under the license agreement and other interpretation-related issues;

•the extent to which our product candidates, technology and processes infringe on intellectual property of the licensor that is not subject to the licensing agreement;

•the sublicensing of patent and other rights under our collaborative development relationships;

•our diligence obligations under the license agreement and what activities satisfy those diligence obligations;

•the inventorship and ownership of inventions and know-how resulting from the joint creation or use of intellectual property by our licensors and us and our partners; and

•the priority of invention of patented technology.

In addition, the agreements under which we currently license intellectual property or technology from third parties are complex, and certain provisions in such agreements may be susceptible to multiple interpretations. The resolution of any contract interpretation disagreement that may arise could narrow what we believe to be the scope of our rights to the relevant intellectual property or technology, or increase what we believe to be our financial or other obligations under the relevant agreement, either of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects. Moreover, if disputes over intellectual property that we have licensed prevent or impair our ability to maintain our current licensing arrangements on commercially acceptable terms, we may be unable to successfully develop and commercialize the affected product candidates, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial conditions, results of operations and prospects.

In addition, we may have limited control over the maintenance and prosecution of these in-licensed patents and patent applications, or any other intellectual property that may be related to our in-licensed intellectual property. For example, we cannot be certain that such activities by any future licensors have been or will be conducted in compliance with applicable laws and regulations or will result in valid and enforceable patents and other intellectual property rights. We have limited control over the manner in which our licensors initiate an infringement proceeding against a third-party infringer of the intellectual property rights, or defend certain of the intellectual property that is licensed to us. It is possible that the licensors’ infringement proceeding or defense activities may be less vigorous than had we conducted them ourselves.

If we are unable to protect the confidentiality of our trade secrets, our business and competitive position would be harmed.

In addition to patent protection, we rely heavily upon know-how and trade secret protection, as well as non-disclosure agreements and invention assignment agreements with our employees, consultants and third parties, to protect our confidential and proprietary information, especially where we do not believe patent protection is appropriate or obtainable. In addition to contractual measures, we try to protect the confidential nature of our proprietary information using physical and technological security measures. Such measures may not, for example, in the case of misappropriation of a trade secret by an employee or third-party with authorized access, provide adequate protection for our proprietary information. Our security measures may not prevent an employee or consultant from misappropriating our trade secrets and providing them to a competitor, and recourse we take against such misconduct may not provide an adequate remedy to protect our interests fully. Enforcing a claim that a party illegally disclosed or misappropriated a trade secret can be difficult, expensive, and time-consuming, and the

outcome is unpredictable. In addition, trade secrets may be independently developed by others in a manner that could prevent legal recourse by us. If any of our confidential or proprietary information, such as our trade secrets, were to be disclosed or misappropriated, or if any such information was independently developed by a competitor, our competitive position could be harmed.

In addition, courts outside the United States are sometimes less willing to protect trade secrets. If we choose to go to court to stop a third-party from using any of our trade secrets, we may incur substantial costs. These lawsuits may consume our time and other resources even if we are successful. Although we take steps to protect our proprietary information and trade secrets, including through contractual means with our employees and consultants, third parties may independently develop substantially equivalent proprietary information and techniques or otherwise gain access to our trade secrets or disclose our technology.

Thus, we may not be able to meaningfully protect our trade secrets. It is our policy to require our employees, consultants, outside scientific collaborators, sponsored researchers and other advisors to execute confidentiality agreements upon the commencement of employment or consulting relationships with us. These agreements provide that all confidential information concerning our business or financial affairs developed or made known to the individual or entity during the course of the party’s relationship with us is to be kept confidential and not disclosed to third parties except in specific circumstances. In the case of employees, the agreements provide that all inventions conceived by the individual, and which are related to our current or planned business or research and development or made during normal working hours, on our premises or using our equipment or proprietary information, are our exclusive property. In addition, we take other appropriate precautions, such as physical and technological security measures, to guard against misappropriation of our proprietary technology by third parties. We have also adopted policies and conduct training that provides guidance on our expectations, and our advice for best practices, in protecting our trade secrets.

Risks Related to Potential Third-Party Claims

Third-party claims of intellectual property infringement may prevent or delay our product discovery and development efforts.

Our commercial success depends in part on our ability to develop, manufacture, market and sell our product candidates and use our proprietary technologies without infringing the proprietary rights of third parties. There is a substantial amount of litigation involving patents and other intellectual property rights in the biotechnology and biopharmaceutical industries, as well as administrative proceedings for challenging patents, including interference, derivation, inter partesreview, post grant review, and reexamination proceedings before the USPTO or oppositions and other comparable proceedings in foreign jurisdictions. We may be exposed to, or threatened with, future litigation by third parties having patent or other intellectual property rights alleging that our product candidates and/or proprietary technologies infringe their intellectual property rights. Numerous U.S. and foreign issued patents and pending patent applications, which are owned by third parties, exist in the fields in which we are developing our product candidates. As the biotechnology and biopharmaceutical industries expand and more patents are issued, the risk increases that our product candidates may give rise to claims of infringement of the patent rights of others. Moreover, it is not always clear to industry participants, including us, which patents cover various types of drugs, products or their methods of use or manufacture. Thus, because of the large number of patents issued and patent applications filed in our fields, there may be a risk that third parties may allege they have patent rights encompassing our product candidates, technologies or methods.

We also may be subject to other third party claims relating to alleged infringement of intellectual property or other proprietary rights, including breach of nondisclosure, nonuse, noncompetition and non-solicitation provisions, intellectual property assignment and ownership, and misuse or misappropriation of intellectual property, trade secrets and other confidential information, among others. If a court of competent jurisdiction finds us liable for any such claims, we may be prohibited from using certain intellectual property, trade secrets and confidential information, effectively blocking our ability to seek patent protection for our inventions and halting the progress of our clinical development and commercialization efforts.

If a third-party claims that we infringe its intellectual property rights, we may face a number of issues, including, but not limited to:

•infringement and other intellectual property claims which, regardless of merit, may be expensive and time-consuming to litigate and may divert our management’s attention from our core business;

•substantial damages for infringement, which we may have to pay if a court decides that the product candidate or technology at issue infringes on or violates the third-party’s rights, and, if the court finds that

the infringement was willful, we could be ordered to pay treble damages and the patent owner’s attorneys’ fees;

•a court prohibiting us from developing, manufacturing, marketing or selling our product candidates, or from using our proprietary technologies, unless the third-party licenses its product rights to us, which it is not required to do;

•if a license is available from a third-party, we may have to pay substantial royalties, upfront fees and other amounts, and/or grant cross- licenses to intellectual property rights for our products and any license that is available may be non-exclusive, which could result in our competitors gaining access to the same intellectual property; and

•redesigning our product candidates or processes so they do not infringe, which may not be possible or may require substantial monetary expenditures and time.

Some of our competitors may be able to sustain the costs of complex patent litigation more effectively than we can because they have substantially greater resources. In addition, any uncertainties resulting from the initiation and continuation of any litigation could have a material adverse effect on our ability to raise the funds necessary to continue our operations or could otherwise have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects. Furthermore, because of the substantial amount of discovery required in connection with intellectual property litigation or administrative proceedings, there is a risk that some of our confidential information could be compromised by disclosure.

Our collaborators may assert ownership or commercial rights to inventions they develop from research we support or that we develop or otherwise arising from the collaboration.

We collaborate with several institutions, universities, medical centers, physicians and researchers in scientific matters and expect to continue to enter into additional collaboration agreements. In certain cases, we do not have written agreements with these collaborators, or the written agreements we have do not cover intellectual property rights. Also, we rely on numerous third parties to provide us with materials that we use to conduct our research activities and develop our product candidates. If we cannot successfully negotiate sufficient ownership and commercial rights to any inventions that result from our use of a third-party collaborator’s materials, or if disputes arise with respect to the intellectual property developed with the use of a collaborator’s samples, or data developed in a collaborator’s study, in cases where written agreements either do or do not exist, we may be limited in our ability to capitalize on the market potential of these inventions or developments.

Third parties may assert that we are employing their proprietary technology without authorization.

There may be third-party patents of which we are currently unaware with claims to compositions of matter, materials, formulations, methods of manufacture or methods for treatment that encompass the composition, use or manufacture of our product candidates. There may be currently pending patent applications of which we are currently unaware which may later result in issued patents that our product candidates or their use or manufacture may infringe. In addition, third parties may obtain patents in the future and claim that use of our technologies infringes upon these patents. If any third- party patent were held by a court of competent jurisdiction to cover our product candidates, intermediates used in the manufacture of our product candidates or our materials generally, aspects of our formulations or methods of use, the holders of any such patent may be able to block our ability to develop and commercialize the product candidate unless we obtained a license or until such patent expires or is finally determined to be held invalid or unenforceable. In either case, such a license may not be available on commercially reasonable terms or at all. If we are unable to obtain a necessary license to a third-party patent on commercially reasonable terms, or at all, our ability to commercialize our product candidates may be impaired or delayed, which could in turn significantly harm our business. Even if we obtain a license, it may be non-exclusive, thereby giving our competitors access to the same technologies licensed to us. In addition, if the breadth or strength of protection provided by our patents and patent applications is threatened, it could dissuade companies from collaborating with us to license, develop or commercialize current or future product candidates.

Parties making claims against us may seek and obtain injunctive or other equitable relief, which could effectively block our ability to further develop and commercialize our product candidates. Defense of these claims, regardless of their merit, would involve substantial litigation expense and would be a substantial diversion of employee resources from our business. In the event of a successful claim of infringement against us, we may have to pay substantial damages, including treble damages and attorneys’ fees for willful infringement, obtain one or more licenses from third parties, pay royalties or redesign our infringing products, which may be impossible, or

require substantial time and monetary expenditure. We cannot predict whether any such license would be available at all or whether it would be available on commercially reasonable terms. Furthermore, even in the absence of litigation, we may need to obtain licenses from third parties to advance our research or allow commercialization of our product candidates. We may fail to obtain any of these licenses at a reasonable cost or on reasonable terms, if at all. In that event, we would be unable to further develop and commercialize our product candidates, which could harm our business significantly.

Third parties may assert that our employees or consultants have wrongfully used or disclosed confidential information or misappropriated trade secrets.

As is common in the biotechnology and biopharmaceutical industries, we employ individuals who were previously employed at universities or other biotechnology or biopharmaceutical companies, including our competitors or potential competitors. Although we try to ensure that our employees and consultants do not use the proprietary information or know-how of others in their work for us, we may be subject to claims that we or our employees, consultants or independent contractors have inadvertently or otherwise used or disclosed intellectual property, including trade secrets or other proprietary information, of a former employer or other third parties. Litigation may be necessary to defend against these claims. If we fail in defending any such claims, in addition to paying monetary damages, we may lose valuable intellectual property rights or personnel. Even if we are successful in defending against such claims, litigation or other legal proceedings relating to intellectual property claims may cause us to incur significant expenses, and could distract our technical and management personnel from their normal responsibilities. In addition, there could be public announcements of the results of hearings, motions or other interim proceedings or developments, and, if securities analysts or investors perceive these results to be negative, it could have a substantial adverse effect on the price of our common stock. This type of litigation or proceeding could substantially increase our operating losses and reduce our resources available for development activities. We may not have sufficient financial or other resources to adequately conduct such litigation or proceedings. Some of our competitors may be able to sustain the costs of such litigation or proceedings more effectively than we can because of their substantially greater financial resources. Uncertainties resulting from the initiation and continuation of patent litigation or other intellectual property related proceedings could adversely affect our ability to compete in the marketplace.

We may not be successful in obtaining or maintaining necessary rights to develop any future product candidates on acceptable terms.

Because our programs may involve additional product candidates that may require the use of proprietary rights held by third parties, the growth of our business may depend in part on our ability to acquire, in-license or use these proprietary rights.

Our product candidates may also require specific formulations to work effectively and efficiently and these rights may be held by others. We may develop products containing our compounds and pre-existing biopharmaceutical compounds. We may be unable to acquire or in-license any compositions, methods of use, processes or other third-party intellectual property rights from third parties that we identify as necessary or important to our business operations. We may fail to obtain any of these licenses at a reasonable cost or on reasonable terms, if at all, which would harm our business. We may need to cease use of the compositions or methods covered by such third-party intellectual property rights, and may need to seek to develop alternative approaches that do not infringe on such intellectual property rights which may entail additional costs and development delays, even if we were able to develop such alternatives, which may not be feasible. Even if we are able to obtain a license, it may be non-exclusive, thereby giving our competitors access to the same technologies licensed to us. In that event, we may be required to expend significant time and resources to develop or license replacement technology.

Additionally, we sometimes collaborate with academic institutions to accelerate our preclinical research or development under written agreements with these institutions. In certain cases, these institutions may provide us with an option to negotiate a license to any of the institution’s rights in technology resulting from the collaboration. Regardless of such option, we may be unable to negotiate a license within the specified timeframe or under terms that are acceptable to us. If we are unable to do so, the institution may offer the intellectual property rights to others, potentially blocking our ability to pursue our program. If we are unable to successfully obtain rights to required third-party intellectual property or to maintain the existing intellectual property rights we have, we may have to abandon development of such program and our business and financial condition could suffer.

The licensing and acquisition of third-party intellectual property rights is a competitive area, and companies, which may be more established, or have greater resources than we do, may also be pursuing strategies to license or acquire third-party intellectual property rights that we may consider necessary or attractive in order to commercialize our product candidates. More established companies may have a competitive advantage over us

due to their size, cash resources and greater clinical development and commercialization capabilities. There can be no assurance that we will be able to successfully complete such negotiations and ultimately acquire the rights to the intellectual property surrounding the additional product candidates that we may seek to acquire.

We may be involved in lawsuits to protect or enforce our patents or the patents of our licensors, which could be expensive, time-consuming and unsuccessful.

Competitors may infringe our patents or the patents of our current or future licensors. To counter infringement or unauthorized use, we may be required to file infringement claims, which can be expensive and time-consuming. In addition, in an infringement proceeding, a court may decide that one or more of our patents is not valid or is unenforceable, or may refuse to stop the other party from using the technology at issue on the grounds that our patents do not cover the technology in question or for other reasons. An adverse result in any litigation or defense proceedings could put one or more of our patents at risk of being invalidated, held unenforceable or interpreted narrowly, and could put our patent applications at risk of not issuing. Defense of these claims, regardless of their merit, would involve substantial litigation expense and would be a substantial diversion of employee resources from our business.

We may choose to challenge the patentability of claims in a third-party’s U.S. patent by requesting that the USPTO review the patent claims in an ex-parte re-examination, inter partes review or post-grant review proceedings. These proceedings are expensive and may consume our time or other resources. We may choose to challenge a third-party’s patent in patent opposition proceedings in the European Patent Office, or EPO, or other foreign patent office. The costs of these opposition proceedings could be substantial, and may consume our time or other resources. If we fail to obtain a favorable result at the USPTO, EPO or other patent office then we may be exposed to litigation by a third-party alleging that the patent may be infringed by our product candidates or proprietary technologies.

In addition, because some patent applications in the United States may be maintained in secrecy until the patents are issued, patent applications in the United States and many foreign jurisdictions are typically not published until 18 months after filing, and publications in the scientific literature often lag behind actual discoveries, we cannot be certain that others have not filed patent applications for technology covered by our owned and in-licensed issued patents or our pending applications, or that we or, if applicable, a licensor were the first to invent the technology. Our competitors may have filed, and may in the future file, patent applications covering our products or technology similar to ours. Any such patent application may have priority over our owned and in-licensed patent applications or patents, which could require us to obtain rights to issued patents covering such technologies. If another party has filed a U.S. patent application on inventions similar to those owned by or in-licensed to us, we or, in the case of in-licensed technology, the licensor may have to participate in an interference or derivation proceeding declared by the USPTO to determine priority of invention in the United States. If we or one of our licensors is a party to an interference or derivation proceeding involving a U.S. patent application on inventions owned by or in-licensed to us, we may incur substantial costs, divert management’s time and expend other resources, even if we are successful.

Interference or derivation proceedings provoked by third parties or brought by us or declared by the USPTO may be necessary to determine the priority of inventions with respect to our patents or patent applications or those of our licensors. An unfavorable outcome could result in a loss of our current patent rights and could require us to cease using the related technology or to attempt to license rights to it from the prevailing party. Our business could be harmed if the prevailing party does not offer us a license on commercially reasonable terms or at all, or if a non-exclusive license is offered and our competitors gain access to the same technology. Litigation or interference proceedings may result in a decision adverse to our interests and, even if we are successful, may result in substantial costs and distract our management and other employees. We may not be able to prevent, alone or with our licensors, misappropriation of our trade secrets or confidential information, particularly in countries where the laws may not protect those rights as fully as in the United States.

Furthermore, because of the substantial amount of discovery required in connection with intellectual property litigation, there is a risk that some of our confidential information could be compromised by disclosure during this type of litigation. In addition, there could be public announcements of the results of hearings, motions or other interim proceedings or developments. If securities analysts or investors perceive these results to be negative, it could have a substantial adverse effect on the price of our common stock.

Risks Related to Patent Laws and Protection

Obtaining and maintaining our patent protection depends on compliance with various procedural, document submission, fee payment and other requirements imposed by governmental patent agencies, and our patent protection could be reduced or eliminated for non-compliance with these requirements.

Periodic maintenance fees on any issued patent are due to be paid to the USPTO and foreign patent agencies in several stages over the lifetime of the patent. The USPTO and various foreign governmental patent agencies require compliance with a number of procedural, documentary, fee payment and other provisions during the patent application process and following the issuance of a patent. While an inadvertent lapse can in many cases be cured by payment of a late fee or by other means in accordance with the applicable rules, there are situations in which noncompliance can result in abandonment or lapse of the patent or patent application, resulting in partial or complete loss of patent rights in the relevant jurisdiction. Noncompliance events that could result in abandonment or lapse of a patent or patent application include, but are not limited to, failure to respond to official actions within prescribed time limits, non-payment of fees and failure to properly legalize and submit formal documents. In certain circumstances, even inadvertent noncompliance events may permanently and irrevocably jeopardize patent rights. In such an event, our competitors might be able to enter the market, which would have a material adverse effect on our business.

Any patents, if issued, covering our product candidates could be found invalid or unenforceable if challenged in court or the USPTO.

If we or one of our licensors initiate legal proceedings against a third-party to enforce a patent covering one of our product candidates, the defendant could counterclaim that the patent covering our product candidate, as applicable, is invalid and/or unenforceable. In patent litigation in the United States, defendant counterclaims alleging invalidity and/or unenforceability are commonplace, and there are numerous grounds upon which a third-party can assert invalidity or unenforceability of a patent. Third parties may also raise similar claims before administrative bodies in the United States or abroad, even outside the context of litigation. Such mechanisms include re-examination, inter partes review, post grant review, and equivalent proceedings in foreign jurisdictions (e.g., opposition proceedings). Such proceedings could result in revocation or amendment to our patents in such a way that they no longer cover our product candidates. The outcome following legal assertions of invalidity and unenforceability is unpredictable. With respect to the validity question, for example, we cannot be certain that there is no invalidating prior art, of which we, our patent counsel and the patent examiner were unaware during prosecution. If a defendant were to prevail on a legal assertion of invalidity and/or unenforceability, or if we are otherwise unable to adequately protect our rights, we would lose at least part, and perhaps all, of the patent protection on our product candidates. Such a loss of patent protection could have a material adverse impact on our business and our ability to commercialize or license our technology and product candidates.

Likewise, our current licensed or owned patents are expected to expire between 2029 and 2041, without taking into account any possible patent term adjustments or extensions. Our earliest patents may expire before, or soon after, our first product achieves marketing approval in the United States or foreign jurisdictions. Upon the expiration of our current patents, we may lose the right to exclude others from practicing these inventions. The expiration of these patents could also have a similar material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects. Our current licensed or owned pending patent applications covering our proprietary technologies or our product candidates that if issued as patents are expected to expire from 2029 through 2041, without taking into account any possible patent term adjustments or extensions. However, we cannot be assured that the USPTO or relevant foreign patent offices will grant any of these patent applications.

Changes in patent law in the United States and in foreign jurisdictions could diminish the value of patents in general, thereby impairing our ability to protect our products.

Changes in either the patent laws or interpretation of the patent laws in the United States could increase the uncertainties and costs surrounding the prosecution of patent applications and the enforcement or defense of issued patents. Assuming that other requirements for patentability are met, prior to March 16, 2013, in the United States, the first to invent the claimed invention was entitled to the patent, while outside the United States, the first to file a patent application was entitled to the patent. On March 16, 2013, under the America Invents Act, the United States transitioned to a first inventor to file system in which, assuming that other requirements for patentability are met, the first inventor to file a patent application will be entitled to the patent on an invention regardless of whether a third party was the first to invent the claimed invention. A third party that files a patent application in the USPTO on or after March 16, 2013, but before us could therefore be awarded a patent covering an invention of ours even if we had made the invention before it was made by such third party. This will require us to be cognizant of the time from invention to filing of a patent application. Since patent applications in the United States and most other countries are confidential for a period of time after filing or until issuance, we cannot be certain that we or our licensors were the first to either (i) file any patent application related to our product candidates or (ii) invent any of the inventions claimed in our or our licensor’s patents or patent applications.

The America Invents Act also includes a number of significant changes that affect the way patent applications will be prosecuted and also may affect patent litigation. These include allowing third party submission of prior art to

the USPTO during patent prosecution and additional procedures to attack the validity of a patent by USPTO administered post-grant proceedings, including post-grant review, inter-parties review and derivation proceedings. Because of a lower evidentiary standard in USPTO proceedings compared to the evidentiary standard in United States federal courts necessary to invalidate a patent claim, a third party could potentially provide evidence in a USPTO proceeding sufficient for the USPTO to hold a claim invalid even though the same evidence would be insufficient to invalidate the claim if first presented in a district court action. Accordingly, a third party may attempt to use the USPTO procedures to invalidate our patent claims that would not have been invalidated if first challenged by the third party as a defendant in a district court action. Therefore, the America Invents Act and its implementation could increase the uncertainties and costs surrounding the prosecution of our owned or in-licensed patent applications and the enforcement or defense of our owned or in-licensed issued patents, all of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

In addition, the patent positions of companies in the development and commercialization of biopharmaceuticals are particularly uncertain. Recent U.S. Supreme Court rulings have narrowed the scope of patent protection available in certain circumstances and weakened the rights of patent owners in certain situations. This combination of events has created uncertainty with respect to the validity and enforceability of patents, once obtained. Depending on future actions by the U.S. Congress, the federal courts, and the USPTO, the laws and regulations governing patents could change in unpredictable ways that could have a material adverse effect on our existing patent portfolio and our ability to protect and enforce our intellectual property in the future.

We have limited foreign intellectual property rights and may not be able to protect our intellectual property rights throughout the world.

We have limited intellectual property rights outside the United States. Filing, prosecuting and defending patents on product candidates in all countries throughout the world would be prohibitively expensive, and our intellectual property rights in some countries outside the United States can be less extensive than those in the United States. In addition, the laws of some foreign countries do not protect intellectual property rights to the same extent as federal and state laws in the United States. Consequently, we may not be able to prevent third parties from practicing our inventions in all countries outside the United States, or from selling or importing products made using our inventions in and into the United States or other jurisdictions. Competitors may use our technologies in jurisdictions where we have not obtained patent protection to develop their own products and, further, may export otherwise infringing products to territories where we have patent protection but where enforcement is not as strong as that in the United States. These products may compete with our products in jurisdictions where we do not have any issued patents and our patent claims or other intellectual property rights may not be effective or sufficient to prevent them from competing.

Many companies have encountered significant problems in protecting and defending intellectual property rights in foreign jurisdictions. The legal systems of certain countries, particularly certain developing countries, do not favor the enforcement of, and may require a compulsory license to, patents, trade secrets and other intellectual property protection, particularly those relating to biopharmaceutical products, which could make it difficult for us to stop the infringement of our patents or marketing of competing products against third parties in violation of our proprietary rights generally.

The initiation of proceedings by third parties to challenge the scope or validity of our patent rights in foreign jurisdictions could result in substantial cost and divert our efforts and attention from other aspects of our business. Proceedings to enforce our patent rights in foreign jurisdictions could result in substantial costs and divert our efforts and attention from other aspects of our business, could put our patents at risk of being invalidated or interpreted narrowly and our patent applications at risk of not issuing and could provoke third parties to assert claims against us. We may not prevail in any lawsuits that we initiate and the damages or other remedies awarded, if any, may not be commercially meaningful. Accordingly, our efforts to enforce our intellectual property rights around the world may be inadequate to obtain a significant commercial advantage from the intellectual property that we develop or license.

Patent terms may be inadequate to protect our competitive position on our product candidates for an adequate amount of time.

Patents have a limited lifespan. In the United States, if all maintenance fees are timely paid, the natural expiration of a patent is generally 20 years from its earliest U.S. non-provisional filing date. Various extensions such as patent term adjustments and/or extensions, may be available, but the life of a patent, and the protection it affords, is limited. Even if patents covering our product candidates are obtained, once the patent life has expired, we may be open to competition from competitive products. Given the amount of time required for the development, testing and regulatory review of new product candidates, patents protecting such candidates might expire before or

shortly after such candidates are commercialized. As a result, our owned and licensed patent portfolio may not provide us with sufficient rights to exclude others from commercializing products similar or identical to ours.

If we do not obtain patent term extension and data exclusivity for any product candidates we may develop, our business may be materially harmed.

Depending upon the timing, duration and specifics of any FDA marketing approval of any product candidates we may develop, one or more of our U.S. patents may be eligible for limited patent term extension under the Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Action of 1984, or the Hatch-Waxman Amendments. The Hatch-Waxman Amendments permit a patent extension term of up to five years as compensation for patent term lost during the FDA regulatory review process. A patent term extension cannot extend the remaining term of a patent beyond a total of 14 years from the date of product approval, only one patent may be extended and only those claims covering the approved drug, a method for using it, or a method for manufacturing it may be extended. However, we may not be granted an extension because of, for example, failing to exercise due diligence during the testing phase or regulatory review process, failing to apply within applicable deadlines, failing to apply prior to expiration of relevant patents, or otherwise failing to satisfy applicable requirements. Moreover, the applicable time period or the scope of patent protection afforded could be less than we request. If we are unable to obtain patent term extension or the term of any such extension is less than we request, our competitors may obtain approval of competing products following our patent expiration, and our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects could be materially harmed.

If our trademarks and trade names are not adequately protected, then we may not be able to build name recognition in our markets of interest and our business may be adversely affected.

Our trademarks or trade names may be challenged, infringed, circumvented or declared generic or determined to be infringing on other marks. We may not be able to protect our rights to these trademarks and trade names or may be forced to stop using these names, which we need for name recognition by potential partners or customers in our markets of interest. If we are unable to establish name recognition based on our trademarks and trade names, we may not be able to compete effectively and our business may be adversely affected.

Risks Related to Our Dependence on Third Parties

Risks Related to Third Parties Generally

We rely on third parties to assist in conducting our preclinical studies and clinical trials. If they do not perform satisfactorily, we may not be able to obtain regulatory approval or commercialize our product candidates, or such approval or commercialization may be delayed, and our business could be substantially harmed.

We have relied upon and plan to continue to rely on third parties, such as laboratories, CROs, clinical data management organizations, medical institutions and clinical investigators, to conduct our preclinical studies and clinical trials and expect to rely on these third parties to conduct preclinical studies and clinical trials of any other product candidate that we develop. Any of these third parties may terminate their engagements with us under certain circumstances. We may not be able to enter into alternative arrangements or do so on commercially reasonable terms. Moreover, delays may occur, which could negatively impact our ability to meet our expected clinical development timelines and harm our business, financial condition and prospects.

Although our reliance on these third parties for preclinical and clinical development activities limits our control over these activities, we remain responsible for ensuring that each of our preclinical studies and clinical trials is conducted in accordance with the applicable protocol, legal and regulatory requirements and scientific standards. Moreover, human clinical research must comply with GCPs for conducting, recording and reporting the results of clinical trials to assure that data and reported results are credible and accurate and that the rights, integrity and confidentiality of trial participants are protected. Regulatory authorities enforce these GCPs through periodic inspections of trial sponsors, principal investigators, clinical trial sites and IRBs. If we or our third-party contractors fail to comply with applicable GCPs, the clinical data generated in our clinical trials may be deemed unreliable and the regulatory authorities may require us to perform additional clinical trials before approving our product candidates, which would delay the regulatory approval process. We cannot be certain that, upon inspection, a regulatory authority will determine that any of our clinical trials comply with GCPs.

The third parties conducting clinical trials on our behalf are not our employees, and except for remedies available to us under our agreements with such contractors, we cannot control whether or not they devote sufficient time, skill and resources to our ongoing development programs. These outside contractors may not assign as great a priority to our programs or pursue them as diligently as we would if we were undertaking such programs ourselves. These contractors may also have relationships with other commercial entities, including our competitors,

for whom they may also be conducting clinical trials or other drug development activities, which could impede their ability to devote appropriate time to our clinical programs. If these third parties, including clinical investigators, do not successfully carry out their contractual duties, meet expected deadlines or conduct our clinical trials in accordance with regulatory requirements or our stated protocols, we may not be able to obtain, or may be delayed in obtaining, regulatory approvals for our product candidates. If that occurs, we will not be able to, or may be delayed in our efforts to, successfully commercialize our product candidates. In such an event, our financial results and the commercial prospects for any product candidates that we seek to develop could be harmed, our costs could increase and our ability to generate revenues could be delayed, impaired or foreclosed.

If our relationships with any third parties conducting our studies are terminated, we may be unable to enter into arrangements with alternative third parties on commercially reasonable terms, or at all. Switching or adding third parties to conduct our studies involves substantial cost and requires extensive management time and focus. In addition, there is a natural transition period when a new third party commences work. As a result, delays occur, which can materially impact our ability to meet our desired preclinical and clinical development timelines. Although we carefully manage our relationships with third parties conducting our studies, we cannot assure that we will not encounter similar challenges or delays in the future or that these delays or challenges will not have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We also rely on other third parties to store and distribute drug supplies for our clinical trials. Any performance failure on the part of our distributors could delay clinical development or regulatory approval of our product candidates or commercialization of any resulting products, producing additional losses and depriving us of potential product revenue.

Risks Related to Third-Party Manufacturers

We contract with third parties for the manufacture of our product candidates. This reliance on third parties increases the risk that we will not have sufficient quantities of our product candidates or drugs or such quantities at an acceptable cost, which could delay, prevent or impair our development or commercialization efforts.

We do not currently have the infrastructure or internal capability to manufacture supplies of our product candidates for use in development and commercialization. We rely, and expect to continue to rely, on third-party manufacturers for the production of our product candidates for preclinical studies and clinical trials under the guidance of members of our organization. If we were to experience an unexpected loss of supply of any of our product candidates or any of our future product candidates for any reason, whether as a result of manufacturing, supply or storage issues or otherwise, we could experience delays, disruptions, suspensions or terminations of, or be required to restart or repeat, any pending or ongoing clinical trials. For example, the extent to which the COVID-19 pandemic impacts our ability to procure sufficient supplies for the development of our products and product candidates will depend on the severity and duration of the spread of the virus, and the actions undertaken to contain COVID-19 or treat its effects.

We expect to continue to rely on third-party manufacturers for the commercial supply of any of our product candidates for which we obtain marketing approval. We may be unable to maintain or establish required agreements with third-party manufacturers or to do so on acceptable terms. Even if we are able to establish agreements with third-party manufacturers, reliance on third-party manufacturers entails additional risks, including:

•the failure of the third party to manufacture our product candidates according to our schedule, or at all, including if our third-party contractors give greater priority to the supply of other products over our product candidates or otherwise do not satisfactorily perform according to the terms of the agreements between us and them;

•the reduction or termination of production or deliveries by suppliers, or the raising of prices or renegotiation of terms;

•the termination or nonrenewal of arrangements or agreements by our third-party contractors at a time that is costly or inconvenient for us;

•the breach by the third-party contractors of our agreements with them;

•the failure of third-party contractors to comply with applicable regulatory requirements;

•the failure of the third party to manufacture our product candidates according to our specifications;

•the mislabeling of clinical supplies, potentially resulting in the wrong dose amounts being supplied or study drug or placebo not being properly identified;

•clinical supplies not being delivered to clinical sites on time and at expected cost due to inflationary impacts, leading to clinical trial interruptions, or of drug supplies not being distributed to commercial vendors in a timely manner, resulting in lost sales; and

•the misappropriation of our proprietary information, including our trade secrets and know-how.

We do not have complete control over all aspects of the manufacturing process of, and are dependent on, our contract manufacturing partners for compliance with cGMP or similar regulations for manufacturing both active drug substances and finished drug products. Third-party manufacturers may not be able to comply with cGMP or similar regulations or similar regulatory requirements outside of the United States. If our contract manufacturers cannot successfully manufacture material that conforms to our specifications and the strict regulatory requirements of the FDA or others, they will not be able to secure and/or maintain marketing approval for their manufacturing facilities. In addition, we do not have control over the ability of our contract manufacturers to maintain adequate quality control, quality assurance and qualified personnel. If the FDA or a comparable foreign regulatory authority does not approve these facilities for the manufacture of our product candidates or if it withdraws any such approval in the future, we may need to find alternative manufacturing facilities, which would significantly impact our ability to develop, obtain marketing approval for or market our product candidates, if approved. Our failure, or the failure of our third-party manufacturers, to comply with applicable regulations could result in sanctions being imposed on us, including fines, injunctions, civil penalties, delays, suspension or withdrawal of approvals, license revocation, seizures or recalls of product candidates or drugs, operating restrictions and criminal prosecutions, any of which could significantly and adversely affect supplies of our product candidates or drugs and harm our business and results of operations.

Our current and anticipated future dependence upon others for the manufacture of our product candidates may adversely affect our future profit margins and our ability to commercialize any product candidates that receive marketing approval on a timely and competitive basis.

If any third-party manufacturer of our product candidates is unable to increase the scale of its production of our product candidates, and/or increase the product yield of its manufacturing, then our costs to manufacture the product may increase and commercialization may be delayed.

In order to produce sufficient quantities to meet the demand for clinical trials and, if approved, subsequent commercialization of our product candidates that we may develop, our third-party manufacturers will be required to increase their production and optimize their manufacturing processes while maintaining the quality of the product. The transition to larger scale production could prove difficult. In addition, if our third party manufacturers are not able to optimize their manufacturing processes to increase the product yield for our product candidates, or if they are unable to produce increased amounts of our product candidates while maintaining the quality of the product, then we may not be able to meet the demands of clinical trials or market demands, which could decrease our ability to generate profits and have a material adverse impact on our business and results of operation.

Risks Related to Third-Party Suppliers

We depend on third-party suppliers for key raw materials used in our manufacturing processes, some of which are our sole source of supply, and the loss of these third-party suppliers or their inability to supply us with adequate raw materials could harm our business.

We rely on our CMOs to purchase from third-party suppliers the materials necessary to produce our product candidates for our clinical trials. We do not have, nor do we expect to enter into, any agreements for the commercial production of these raw materials, and we do not expect to have any control over the process or timing of our CMOs’ acquisition of raw materials needed to produce our product candidates. Any significant delay in the supply of a product candidate or the raw material components thereof for an ongoing clinical trial due to a manufacturer’s need to replace a third-party supplier of raw materials could considerably delay completion of our clinical trials, product testing and potential regulatory approval of our product candidates. Additionally, if our future manufacturers or we are unable to purchase these raw materials to commercially produce any of our product candidates that gains regulatory approvals, the commercial launch of our product candidates would be delayed or there would be a shortage in supply, which would impair our ability to generate revenues from the sale of our product candidates.

Furthermore, for those third-party suppliers who may be our sole source of supply of certain materials, we may not have arrangements in place for a redundant or second-source supply of any such materials in the event any of our current suppliers cease their operations for any reason. Establishing additional or replacement suppliers for the raw materials used in our product candidates, if required, may not be accomplished quickly. If we are able to find a replacement supplier, such replacement supplier would need to be qualified and may require additional regulatory inspection or approval, which could result in further delay.

We depend on collaborations with third parties for the research, development and commercialization of certain of the product candidates we may develop. If any such collaborations are not successful, we may not be able to realize the market potential of those product candidates.

We have, and may seek in the future, third-party collaborators for the research, development and commercialization of certain of the product candidates we may develop. For example, we have a collaboration with Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. to further our development of product candidates and to enhance our research efforts directed to developing a product candidate for the treatment of epilepsy. Our likely collaborators for any other collaboration arrangements include large and mid-size pharmaceutical companies, regional and national pharmaceutical companies, biotechnology companies and academic institutions, such as The Florey Institute of Neuroscience. If we enter into any such arrangements with any third parties, we will likely have shared or limited control over the amount and timing of resources that our collaborators dedicate to the development or potential commercialization of any product candidates we may seek to develop with them. Our ability to generate revenue from these arrangements with commercial entities will depend on our collaborators’ abilities to successfully perform the functions assigned to them in these arrangements. We cannot predict the success of any collaboration that we enter into.

Collaborations involving our research programs, or any product candidates we may develop, pose the following risks to us:

•collaborators generally have significant discretion in determining the efforts and resources that they will apply to these collaborations;

•collaborators may not properly obtain, maintain, enforce or defend intellectual property or proprietary rights relating to our product candidates or research programs, or may use our proprietary information in such a way as to expose us to potential litigation or other intellectual property related proceedings, including proceedings challenging the scope, ownership, validity and enforceability of our intellectual property;

•collaborators may own or co-own intellectual property covering our product candidates or research programs that results from our collaboration with them, and in such cases, we may not have the exclusive right to commercialize such intellectual property or such product candidates or research programs;

•we may need the cooperation of our collaborators to enforce or defend any intellectual property we contribute to or that arises out of our collaborations, which may not be provided to us;

•collaborators may control certain interactions with regulatory authorities, which may impact our ability to obtain and maintain regulatory approval of our products candidates;

•disputes may arise between the collaborators and us that result in the delay or termination of the research, development or commercialization of our product candidates or research programs or that result in costly litigation or arbitration that diverts management attention and resources;

•collaborators may decide to not pursue development and commercialization of any product candidates we develop or may elect not to continue or renew development or commercialization programs based on clinical trial results, changes in the collaborator’s strategic focus or available funding or external factors such as an acquisition that diverts resources or creates competing priorities;

•collaborators may delay clinical trials, provide insufficient funding for a clinical trial program, stop a clinical trial or abandon a product candidate, repeat or conduct new clinical trials or require a new formulation of a product candidate for clinical testing;

•collaborators could independently develop, or develop with third parties, products that compete directly or indirectly with our product candidates or research programs if the collaborators believe that competitive products are more likely to be successfully developed or can be commercialized under terms that are more economically attractive than ours;

•collaborators may restrict us from researching, developing or commercializing certain products or technologies without their involvement;

•collaborators with marketing and distribution rights to one or more product candidates may not commit sufficient resources to the marketing and distribution of such product candidates;

•we may lose certain valuable rights under circumstances identified in our collaborations, including if we undergo a change of control;

•collaborators may grant sublicenses to our technology or product candidates or undergo a change of control and the sublicensees or new owners may decide to take the collaboration in a direction which is not in our best interest;

•collaborators may become bankrupt, which may significantly delay our research or development programs, or may cause us to lose access to valuable technology, know-how or intellectual property of the collaborator relating to our products, product candidates or research programs;

•key personnel at our collaborators may leave, which could negatively impact our ability to productively work with our collaborators;

•collaborations may require us to incur short and long-term expenditures, issue securities that dilute our stockholders or disrupt our management and business;

•if our collaborators do not satisfy their obligations under our agreements with them, or if they terminate our collaborations with them, we may not be able to develop or commercialize product candidates as planned;

•collaborations may require us to share in development and commercialization costs pursuant to budgets that we do not fully control and our failure to share in such costs could have a detrimental impact on the collaboration or our ability to share in revenue generated under the collaboration;

•collaborations may be terminated in their entirety or with respect to certain product candidates or technologies and, if so terminated, may result in a need for additional capital to pursue further development or commercialization of the applicable product candidates or technologies; and

•collaboration agreements may not lead to development or commercialization of product candidates in the most efficient manner or at all. If a present or future collaborator of ours were to be involved in a business combination, the continued pursuit and emphasis on our development or commercialization program under such collaboration could be delayed, diminished or terminated.

We may face significant competition in seeking appropriate collaborations. Recent business combinations among biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies have resulted in a reduced number of potential collaborators. In addition, the negotiation process is time-consuming and complex, and we may not be able to negotiate collaborations on a timely basis, on acceptable terms, or at all. If we are unable to do so, we may have to curtail the development of the product candidate for which we are seeking to collaborate, reduce or delay its development program or one or more of our other development programs, delay its potential commercialization or reduce the scope of any sales or marketing activities, or increase our expenditures and undertake development or commercialization activities at our own expense. If we elect to increase our expenditures to fund development or commercialization activities on our own, we may need to obtain additional capital, which may not be available to us on acceptable terms or at all. If we do not have sufficient funds, we may not be able to further develop product candidates or bring them to market and generate product revenue.

If we enter into collaborations to develop and potentially commercialize any product candidates, we may not be able to realize the benefit of such transactions if we or our collaborator elects not to exercise the rights granted under the agreement or if we or our collaborator are unable to successfully integrate a product candidate into existing operations and company culture. The failure to develop and commercialize a product candidate pursuant to our agreements with our current or future collaborators could prevent us from receiving future payments under such agreements, which could negatively impact our revenues. In addition, if our agreement with any of our collaborators terminates, our access to technology and intellectual property licensed to us by that collaborator may be restricted or terminate entirely, which may delay our continued development of our product candidates utilizing the collaborator’s technology or intellectual property or require us to stop development of those product candidates completely. We may also find it more difficult to find a suitable replacement collaborator or attract new collaborators, and our development programs may be delayed or the perception of us in the business and financial communities could be adversely affected. Many of the risks relating to product development, regulatory approval, and commercialization described in this “Risk Factors” section also apply to the activities of our collaborators and any negative impact on our collaborators may adversely affect us.

We may acquire businesses or products, or form strategic alliances, in the future, and we may not realize the benefits of such acquisitions or alliances.

We may acquire additional businesses or products, form strategic alliances or create joint ventures with third parties that we believe will complement or augment our existing business. If we acquire businesses with promising markets or technologies, we may not be able to realize the benefit of acquiring such businesses if we are unable to successfully integrate them with our existing operations and company culture. We may encounter numerous

difficulties in developing, manufacturing and marketing any new products resulting from a strategic alliance or acquisition that delay or prevent us from realizing their expected benefits or enhancing our business. We cannot assure that, following any such acquisition, we will achieve the expected synergies to justify the transaction.

Risks Related to Employee Matters, Managing Our Business and Operations

Risks Related to Business Operations

Business interruptions resulting from COVID-19 or a similar pandemic, epidemic or outbreak of an infectious disease in the United States or worldwide may adversely affect our business.

~~If a pandemic, epidemic or outbreak of an infectious disease occurs in the United States or worldwide our business may be adversely affected.~~ In December 2019, a novel strain of coronavirus named SARS-CoV-2 was identified in Wuhan, China. This virus continues to spread globally, including in the United States and the disease it causes, COVID-19, has been declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization. The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted the global economy and may impact our operations, including the potential interruption of our clinical trial activities, regulatory reviews and our supply chain. ~~Furthermore, the spread of the virus may affect the operations of key governmental agencies, such as the FDA, which may delay the development or approval process for our product candidates.~~

The COVID-19 pandemic has and may in the future delay enrollment in our clinical trials due to prioritization of hospital resources or patients being either unwilling to enroll in our trials or unable to comply with clinical trial protocols if quarantines impede patient movement or interrupt healthcare services, which would delay our ability to conduct clinical trials or release clinical trial results and could delay our ability to obtain regulatory approval and commercialize our product candidates. For example, we had previously observed delays in our trial enrollment in Australia for our PRAX-944 Phase 2a trial due to stringent COVID-19 lockdown restrictions. While ~~we didn’t experience~~these lockdowns did not lead to a material impact on this trial from the delay in enrollment, we cannot predict the scope and severity of potential shutdowns or disruptions of businesses due to COVID-19 in the future.

The spread of COVID-19 may also result in the inability of our suppliers to deliver components or raw materials on a timely basis or at all. Three vaccines for COVID-19 were granted Emergency Use Authorization by the FDA in late 2020 and early 2021, and more are likely to be authorized in the coming months. The resultant demand for vaccines and potential for manufacturing facilities and materials to be commandeered under the Defense Production Act of 1950, or equivalent foreign legislation, may make it more difficult to obtain materials or manufacturing slots for the products needed for our clinical trials, which could lead to delays in these trials. In addition, hospitals may reduce staffing and reduce or postpone certain treatments in response to the spread of an infectious disease. Such events may result in a period of business disruption, and in reduced operations, or doctors and medical providers may be unwilling to participate in our clinical trials, any of which could materially affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We continue to closely monitor the COVID-19 pandemic as we evolve our business continuity plans, clinical development plans and response strategy. The extent to which the COVID-19 pandemic impacts our business will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted, including new information which may emerge concerning the severity of the novel coronavirus, ~~and~~ the actions to contain the coronavirus or treat its impact and the extent and duration of the pandemic's impact on economic conditions and social activity, including with respect to inflationary pressures and supply chain shortages and disruptions, among others. At present, we are not experiencing significant impact or delays from the COVID-19 pandemic on our business, operations and, if approved, commercialization plans. In addition, we have taken steps to mitigate against COVID-19 pandemic-related delays, and may take additional measures, intended to help minimize the risk of the virus to our employees, including temporarily requiring all employees to work remotely, suspending all non-essential travel worldwide for our employees, and discouraging employee attendance at industry events and in-person work-related meetings, which could negatively affect our business.

While we have taken and are continuing to take steps to mitigate against possible delays, our planned clinical trials may be affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, including (i) delays or difficulties in enrolling and retaining patients in our planned clinical trials, including patients that may not be able or willing to comply with clinical trial protocols if

quarantines impede patient movement or interrupt healthcare services; (ii) delays or difficulties in clinical site initiation, including difficulties in recruiting and retaining clinical site investigators and clinical site staff; (iii) diversion or prioritization of healthcare resources away from the conduct of clinical trials and towards the COVID-19 pandemic, including the diversion of hospitals serving as our clinical trial sites and hospital staff supporting the conduct of our clinical trials, and because, who, as healthcare providers, may have heightened exposure to COVID-19 and adversely impact our clinical trial operations; (iv) interruption of our future clinical supply chain or key clinical trial activities, such as clinical trial site monitoring, due to limitations on travel imposed or recommended by federal, state/provincial or municipal governments, employers and others; and (v) limitations in outsourced third-party resources that would otherwise be focused on the conduct of our planned clinical trials, including because of sickness of third-party personnel or their families, or the desire of third-party personnel to avoid contact with large groups of people. A significant outbreak of other infectious diseases in the future also could result in a widespread health crisis that could adversely affect the economies and financial markets worldwide, resulting in an economic downturn that could impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our business is subject to economic, political, regulatory and other risks associated with international operations.

Our business is subject to risks associated with conducting business internationally. Some of our suppliers and collaborative relationships are located outside the United States. Accordingly, our future results could be harmed by a variety of factors, including:

•economic weakness, including inflation, or political instability in particular non-U.S. economies and markets;

•differing and changing regulatory requirements in non-U.S. countries;

•challenges enforcing our contractual and intellectual property rights, especially in those foreign countries that do not respect and protect intellectual property rights to the same extent as the United States, including our ability to prosecute or maintain patents in Russia due to the sanctions imposed by the United States and other countries on Russia as a result of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and our ability to enforce patents due to Russia's March 2022 decree that allows the use of inventions, utility models and industrial designs that are held by intellectual property owners from "unfriendly countries," including the United States, without the consent of or payment of any compensation to such owners;

•difficulties in compliance with non-U.S. laws and regulations;

•changes in non-U.S. regulations and customs, tariffs and trade barriers;

•changes in non-U.S. currency exchange rates and currency controls;

•changes in a specific country’s or region’s political or economic environment;

•trade protection measures, import or export licensing requirements or other restrictive actions by U.S. or non-U.S. governments;

•negative consequences from changes in tax laws;

•compliance with tax, employment, immigration and labor laws for employees living or traveling abroad;

•workforce uncertainty in countries where labor unrest is more common than in the United States;

•difficulties associated with staffing and managing international operations, including differing labor relations

•potential liability under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, U.K. Bribery Act of 2010 or comparable foreign laws, including expanded sanctions imposed by the United States and other countries on Russia due to Russia's invasion of Ukraine;

•business interruptions resulting from geo-political actions, including war and terrorism, such as Russia's invasion of Ukraine, natural disasters including earthquakes, typhoons, floods and fires, or health epidemics such as COVID-19; and

•cyberattacks, which are growing in frequency, sophistication and intensity, and are becoming increasingly difficult to detect, including an increased likelihood that Russia's invasion of Ukraine could result in more cyberattacks or cybersecurity incidents.

These and other risks associated with our planned international operations may materially adversely affect our ability to attain profitable operations.

Risks Related to Employees

We ~~will no longer be an “emerging growth company” or a “smaller reporting company”~~depend heavily on our executive officers, principal consultants and others, and the ~~reduced disclosure~~loss of their services would materially harm our business.

Our success depends, and will likely continue to depend, upon our ability to retain the services of our current executive officers, principal consultants and others, including Marcio Souza, our President and Chief Executive Officer, and Timothy Kelly, our Chief Financial Officer. We have entered into employment agreements with Mr. Souza and Mr. Kelly, but they may terminate their employment with us at any time. The loss of their services might impede the achievement of our research, development and commercialization objectives. In August 2022, Bernard Ravina stepped down as our Chief Medical Officer and transitioned to a part-time role as strategic advisor. This change in our senior management may be disruptive to our business, and if we are unable to manage an orderly transition of Dr. Ravina's duties to our clinical team or to a new Chief Medical Officer, our business may be adversely affected. We do not maintain “key person” insurance for any of our executives or other employees.

Our ability to compete in the biotechnology and pharmaceuticals industries depends upon our ability to attract and retain highly qualified managerial, scientific and medical personnel. Our industry has experienced significant demand for, and a high rate of turnover of, management personnel in recent years. Replacing executive officers or other key employees may be difficult and may take an extended period of time because of the limited number of individuals in our industry with the breadth of skills and experience required to develop, gain regulatory approval of and commercialize products successfully.

Competition to hire from this limited pool is intense, and we may be unable to hire, train, retain or motivate these additional key employees on acceptable terms given the competition among numerous pharmaceutical and

biotechnology companies for similar personnel. We also experience competition for the hiring of scientific and clinical personnel from universities and research institutions.

In addition, we have a limited number of employees to manage and operate our business. We cannot ensure that we will be able to maintain adequate staff to develop our product candidates, to run our operations or accomplish our objectives. If we are unable to maintain adequate staffing levels, our business and operations could be materially adversely affected.

We rely on consultants and advisors, including scientific and clinical advisors, to assist us in formulating our research and development and commercialization strategies. Our consultants and advisors may be employed by other entities and may have commitments under consulting or advisory contracts with those entities that may limit their availability to us. If we are unable to continue to attract and retain highly qualified personnel, our ability to develop and commercialize our product candidates will be limited.

Our employees, independent contractors, consultants, collaborators and contract research organizations may engage in misconduct or other improper activities, including non-compliance with regulatory standards and requirements, ~~applicable to emerging growth companies~~which could cause significant liability for us and ~~smaller reporting companies will no longer apply to us.~~harm our reputation.

We are exposed to the risk that our employees, independent contractors, consultants, collaborators and contract research organizations may engage in fraudulent conduct or other illegal activity. Misconduct by those parties could include intentional, reckless and/or negligent conduct or disclosure of unauthorized activities to us that violates:

•regulatory authorities, including those laws requiring the reporting of true, complete and accurate information to such authorities;

•manufacturing standards;

•federal and state healthcare fraud and abuse laws and regulations and similar laws and regulations established and enforced by comparable non-U.S. regulatory authorities; and

•laws that require the accurate reporting of financial information or data.

Activities subject to these laws also involve the improper use or misrepresentation of information obtained in the course of clinical trials, creating fraudulent data in our preclinical studies or clinical trials or illegal misappropriation of product materials, which could result in regulatory sanctions and serious harm to our reputation. It is not always possible to identify and deter misconduct, and the precautions we take to detect and prevent this kind of activity may not be effective in controlling unknown or unmanaged risks or losses or in protecting us from governmental investigations or other actions or lawsuits stemming from a failure to be in compliance with such laws, standards or regulations. Additionally, we are subject to the risk that a person or government could allege such fraud or other misconduct, even if none occurred. If any such actions are instituted against us, and we are not successful in defending ourselves or asserting our rights, those actions could have a significant impact on our business and results of operations, including the imposition of civil, criminal and administrative penalties, damages, monetary fines, disgorgement, integrity oversight and reporting obligations, possible exclusion from participation in the United States in Medicare, Medicaid and other federal healthcare programs, contractual damages, reputational harm, diminished profits and future earnings and curtailment of our operations, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our ability to operate our business and our results of operations.

We expect to expand our organization, and as a result, we may encounter difficulties in managing our growth, which could disrupt our operations.

We expect to experience significant growth in the number of our employees and the scope of our operations, particularly in the areas of regulatory affairs and sales, marketing and distribution, as well as to support our public company operations. To manage these growth activities, we must continue to implement and improve our managerial, operational and financial systems, expand our facilities and continue to recruit and train additional qualified personnel. Our management may need to devote a significant amount of its attention to managing these growth activities. Due to our limited financial resources and the limited experience of our management team in managing a company with such anticipated growth, we may not be able to effectively manage the expansion or relocation of our operations, retain key employees, or identify, recruit and train additional qualified personnel. Our inability to manage the expansion or relocation of our operations effectively may result in weaknesses in our infrastructure, give rise to operational mistakes, loss of business opportunities, loss of employees and reduced productivity among remaining employees. Our expected growth could also require significant capital expenditures and may divert financial resources from other projects, such as the development of additional product candidates. If we are unable to effectively manage our expected growth, our expenses may increase more than expected, our

ability to generate revenues could be reduced and we may not be able to implement our business strategy, including the successful commercialization of our product candidates.

Risks Related to Data Privacy

Cyber-attacks or other failures in our telecommunications or information technology systems, or those of our collaborators, contract research organizations, third-party logistics providers, distributors or other contractors or consultants, could result in information theft, data corruption and significant disruption of our business operations.

We, our collaborators, our CROs, third-party logistics providers, distributors and other contractors and consultants utilize information technology, or IT, systems and networks to process, transmit and store electronic information in connection with our business activities. As use of digital technologies has increased, cyber incidents, including third parties gaining access to employee accounts using stolen or inferred credentials, computer malware, viruses, spamming, phishing attacks or other means, and deliberate attacks and attempts to gain unauthorized access to computer systems and networks, have increased in frequency and sophistication. Attacks upon information technology systems are also increasing in their levels of persistence and intensity, and are being conducted by sophisticated and organized groups and individuals with a wide range of motives and expertise. As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, we may also face increased cybersecurity risks due to our reliance on internet technology and the number of our employees who are working remotely, which may create additional opportunities for cybercriminals to exploit vulnerabilities. Furthermore, because the techniques used to obtain unauthorized access to, or to sabotage, systems change frequently and often are not recognized until launched against a target, we may be unable to anticipate these techniques or implement adequate preventative measures. We may also experience security breaches that may remain undetected for an extended period.

While we do not believe that we have experienced any such system failure, accident or security breach to date, if such an event were to occur and cause interruptions in our operations, it could result in a material disruption of our drug development programs. These threats pose a risk to the security of our, our collaborators’, our CROs’, third-party logistics providers’, distributors’ and other contractors’ and consultants’ systems and networks, and the confidentiality, availability and integrity of our data. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in preventing cyber-attacks or successfully mitigating their effects. Similarly, there can be no assurance that our collaborators, CROs, third-party logistics providers, distributors and other contractors and consultants will be successful in protecting our clinical and other data that is stored on their systems. Any cyber-attack, data breach or destruction or loss of data could result in a violation of applicable U.S. and international privacy, data protection and other laws, and subject us to litigation and governmental investigations and proceedings by federal, state and local regulatory entities in the United States and by international regulatory entities, resulting in exposure to material civil and/or criminal liability. Further, our general liability insurance and corporate risk program may not cover all potential claims to which we are exposed and may not be adequate to indemnify us for all liability that may be imposed; and could have a material adverse effect on our business and prospects. For example, the loss of clinical trial data from completed, ongoing or planned clinical trials for any of our product candidates could result in delays in our development and regulatory approval efforts and significantly increase our costs to recover or reproduce the data. In addition, we may suffer reputational harm or face litigation or adverse regulatory action as a result of cyber-attacks or other data security breaches and may incur significant additional expense to implement further data protection measures.

We rely on a set of cloud-based software services and access these services via the Internet for the vast majority of our computing, storage, bandwidth and other services. Any disruption of or interference with our use of our cloud-based services would negatively affect our operations and could seriously harm our business.

We use several distributed computing infrastructure platforms for business operations, or what is commonly referred to as “cloud” computing services and we access these services via the Internet. Any transition of the cloud services currently provided by an ~~emerging growth~~existing vendor to another cloud provider would be difficult to implement and will cause us to incur significant time and expense. Given this, any significant disruption of or interference with our use of these cloud computing services would negatively impact our operations and our business would be seriously harmed. If our employees or partners are not able to access our cloud computing services or encounter difficulties in doing so, we may experience business disruption. The level of service provided by our cloud computing vendors, including the ability to secure our confidential information and the confidential information of third parties that is shared with us, may also impact the perception of our company and could seriously harm our business and reputation and create liability for us. If a cloud computing service that we use experiences interruptions in service regularly or for a prolonged basis, or other similar issues, our business could be seriously harmed.

In addition, a cloud computing service may take actions beyond our control that could seriously harm our business, including:

•discontinuing or limiting our access to its platform;

•increasing pricing terms;

•terminating or seeking to terminate our contractual relationship altogether; or

•modifying or interpreting its terms of service or other policies in a manner that impacts our ability to run our business and operations.

Our cloud computing services have broad discretion to change and interpret its terms of service and other policies with respect to us, and those actions may be unfavorable to us. Our cloud computing services may also alter how we are able to process data on the platform. If a cloud computing services makes changes or interpretations that are unfavorable to us, our business could be seriously harmed.

Our efforts to protect the information shared with us may be unsuccessful due to the actions of third parties, software bugs or other technical malfunctions, employee error or malfeasance or other factors. In addition, third parties may attempt to fraudulently induce employees or users to disclose information to gain access to our data or third-party data entrusted to us. If any of these events occur, our or third-party information could be accessed or disclosed improperly. Some partners or collaborators may store information that we share with them on their own computing system. If these third parties fail to implement adequate data-security practices or fail to comply with our policies, our data may be improperly accessed or disclosed. And even if these third parties take all of these steps, their networks may still suffer a breach, which could compromise our data.

Any incidents where our information is accessed without authorization, or is improperly used, or incidents that violate our policies, could damage our reputation and our brand and diminish our competitive position. In addition, affected parties or government authorities could initiate legal or regulatory action against us over those incidents, which could cause us to incur significant expense and liability or result in orders or consent decrees forcing us to modify our business practices. Concerns over our privacy practices, whether actual or unfounded, could damage our reputation and brand and deter users, advertisers and partners from using our products and services. Any of these occurrences could seriously harm our business.

Risks Related to Tax Laws

Legislation or other changes in U.S. tax law could adversely affect our business and financial condition.

The legislation, regulations and rules regarding U.S. federal, state and local income taxation are constantly under review by persons involved in the legislative process and by the Internal Revenue Service and the U.S. Treasury Department and by state and local tax agencies. Changes to tax laws (which changes may have retroactive application) could adversely affect us or holders of our common stock. In recent years, many changes have been made to applicable tax laws and changes are likely to continue to occur in the future. In particular, the U.S. federal government may enact significant changes to the taxation of business entities including, among others, an increase in the corporate income tax rate and the imposition of minimum taxes or surtaxes on certain types of income.

It cannot be predicted whether, when, in what form or with what effective dates any changes in tax laws, regulations or rules, promulgated or issued under existing or new tax laws, which could result in an increase in our or our shareholders’ tax liability or require changes in the manner in which we operate in order to minimize or mitigate any adverse effects of changes in tax law or in the interpretation thereof. If any such changes are enacted or implemented, we care currently unable to predict the ultimate impact on our business or holders of our common stock.

Our ability to use our U.S. federal and state net operating loss carryforwards and certain other tax attributes may be limited.

Our ability to use our U.S. federal and state net operating losses and tax credits is dependent upon our generation of future taxable income and income tax liabilities, and we cannot predict with certainty when, or whether, we will generate sufficient taxable income or income tax liabilities to use any or all of our net operating losses or tax credits.

Our unused U.S. federal net operating losses generated in tax years beginning before January 1, 2018, and unused state net operating losses subject to expiration, will carry forward to offset future taxable income, if any, until such unused net operating losses expire. Our unused U.S. federal net operating losses generated in tax years beginning after December 31, 2017 will not expire and may be carried forward indefinitely, although, for taxable

years beginning after December 31, 2020, the deductibility of such U.S. federal net operating losses is limited to 80% of our taxable income in such taxable year.

In addition, both our current and future net operating losses and tax credits may be subject to limitation under Sections 382 and 383 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code, if we undergo an “ownership change,” generally defined as a greater than 50 percentage point change (by value) in its equity ownership by certain stockholders or groups of stockholders over a rolling three-year period.

Risks Related to Our Common Stock

Risks Related to Investment in Securities

The price of our stock has been and may in the future be volatile, and you could lose all or part of your investment.

The trading price of our common stock has been and is likely to continue to be highly volatile and has been subject to wide fluctuations in response to various factors, some of which are beyond our control, including limited trading volume. For example, the trading price of our common stock experienced a significant decline after our June 2022 announcement of the Phase 2/3 Aria Study results. In addition to the factors discussed in this “Risk Factors” section, factors that may affect the trading price of our common stock include:

•the commencement, enrollment, completion or results of our current clinical trials of our product candidates;

•any delay in identifying and advancing a clinical candidate for our other programs;

•any delay in our regulatory filings for our product candidates and any adverse development or perceived adverse development with respect to the applicable regulatory authority’s review of such filings, including without limitation the FDA’s issuance of a “refusal to file” letter or a request for additional information;

•adverse results or delays, suspensions or terminations in future preclinical studies or clinical trials;

•our decision to initiate a clinical trial, not to initiate a clinical trial or to terminate an existing clinical trial;

•adverse regulatory decisions, including failure to receive regulatory approval of any of our product candidates or the failure of a regulatory authority to accept data from preclinical studies or clinical trials conducted in other countries;

•changes in laws or regulations applicable to our product candidates, including but ~~because as~~not limited to clinical trial requirements for approvals;

•adverse developments concerning our manufacturers;

•our inability to obtain adequate product supply for any approved product or inability to do so at acceptable prices;

•our inability to establish collaborations, if needed;

•our failure to commercialize our product candidates, if approved;

•additions or departures of ~~June 30, 2021,~~key scientific or management personnel;

•unanticipated serious safety concerns related to the use of our product candidates;

•introduction of new products or services offered by us or our competitors;

•announcements of significant acquisitions, strategic partnerships, joint ventures or capital commitments by us or our competitors;

•our ability to effectively manage our growth;

•actual or anticipated variations in quarterly operating results;

•our cash position;

•our failure to meet the estimates and projections of the investment community or that we may otherwise provide to the public;

•publication of research reports about us or our industry, or product candidates in particular, or positive or negative recommendations or withdrawal of research coverage by securities analysts;

•changes in the market valuations of similar companies;

•changes in the structure of the healthcare payment systems;

•overall performance of the equity markets;

•sales of our common stock by us or our stockholders in the future;

•trading volume of our common stock;

•changes in accounting practices;

•ineffectiveness of our internal controls;

•disputes or other developments relating to proprietary rights, including patents, litigation matters and our ability to obtain patent protection for our technologies;

•significant lawsuits, including patent or stockholder litigation;

•general political and economic conditions; and

•other events or factors, many of which are beyond our control.

In addition, the stock market in general, and the market for biopharmaceutical companies in particular, have experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have often been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of these companies, including as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic and general economic conditions. Broad market and industry factors have negatively affected and may continue to negatively affect the market price of our common stock, regardless of our actual operating performance. In the past, securities class action litigation has often been instituted against companies following periods of volatility in the market price of a company’s securities. This type of litigation, if instituted, could result in substantial costs and a diversion of management’s attention and resources.

If securities or industry analysts do not publish research or publish inaccurate or unfavorable research about our business, our stock price and trading volume could decline.

The trading market for our common stock depends in part on the research and reports that securities or industry analysts publish about us or our business. We may never obtain research coverage by industry or financial analysts. If no securities or industry analysts commence coverage of our company, the trading price for our stock would likely be negatively impacted. In the event securities or industry analysts initiate coverage, if one or more of the analysts who covers us downgrades our stock or publishes inaccurate or unfavorable research about our business, our stock price may decline. If one or more of these analysts ceases coverage of our company or fails to publish reports on us regularly, demand for our stock could decrease, which might cause our stock price and trading volume to decline.

We do not intend to pay dividends on our common stock so any returns will be limited to the value of our stock.

We currently anticipate that we will retain future earnings for the development, operation and expansion of our business and do not anticipate declaring or paying any cash dividends for the foreseeable future. Furthermore, future debt or other financing arrangements may contain terms prohibiting or limiting the amount of dividends that may be declared or paid on our common stock. Any return to stockholders will therefore be limited to the appreciation of their stock.

Our issuance of additional capital stock in connection with financings, acquisitions, investments, our stock incentive plans or otherwise will dilute all other stockholders.

We expect to issue additional capital stock in the future that will result in dilution to all other stockholders. We expect to grant equity awards to employees, directors and consultants under our stock incentive plans. We may also raise capital through equity financings in the future. As part of our business strategy, we may acquire or make investments in complementary companies, products or technologies and issue equity securities to pay for any such acquisition or investment. Any such issuances of additional capital stock may cause stockholders to experience significant dilution of their ownership interests and the per share value of our common stock ~~that was held by non-affiliates exceeded $700 million, we be~~to decline.

Our executive officers, directors and their affiliates and our principal stockholders own a ~~large-accelerated filer~~significant percentage of our stock and will ~~no longer qualify for such status commencing December 3, 2021. As a result, we will~~ be able to exert control over matters subject to ~~certain disclosure requirements that are applicable~~stockholder approval.

Based on shares outstanding as of December 31, 2021, our executive officers, directors and their affiliates and our principal stockholders beneficially hold, in the aggregate, approximately 62.2% of our outstanding voting stock. These stockholders, acting together, would be able to ~~other public companies that~~control all matters requiring stockholder approval. The

concentration of voting power among these stockholders may have ~~not been applicable to us as~~ an ~~emerging growth company. These requirements include:~~adverse effect on the price of our common stock. This concentration of ownership control may adversely affect the market price of our common stock by:

•~~compliance with the auditor attestation requirements~~delaying, deferring or preventing a change in ~~the assessment of our internal control over financial reporting;~~control;

•entrenching our management and the board of directors;

•impeding a merger, consolidation, takeover or other business combination involving us that other stockholders may desire; and/or

•discouraging a potential acquirer from making a tender offer or otherwise attempting to obtain control of us.

Risks Related to Our Controls and Reporting Requirements

We will continue to incur significant increased costs as a result of operating as a public company, and our management will be required to devote substantial time to new compliance initiatives.

As a public company, we will continue to incur significant legal, accounting and other expenses that we did not incur as a private company. We are subject to the reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, which require, among other things, that we file with ~~any requirement that may be~~the SEC annual, quarterly and current reports with respect to our business and financial condition. In addition, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, as well as rules subsequently adopted by the ~~Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding mandatory audit firm rotation~~SEC and The Nasdaq Global Select Market to implement provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, impose significant requirements on public companies, including requiring establishment and maintenance of effective disclosure and financial reporting controls and changes in corporate governance practices. Further, in July 2010, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, or ~~a supplement~~the Dodd- Frank Act, was enacted. There are significant corporate governance and executive compensation related provisions in the Dodd-Frank Act that require the SEC to adopt additional rules and regulations in these areas such as “say on pay” and proxy access. Stockholder activism, the ~~auditor’s report providing additional information about the audit~~current political environment and the ~~financial statements;~~

•~~full~~current high level of government intervention and regulatory reform may lead to substantial new regulations and disclosure obligations, ~~regarding~~which may lead to additional compliance costs and impact the manner in which we operate our business in ways we cannot currently anticipate.

The rules and regulations applicable to public companies substantially increase our legal and financial compliance costs and make some activities more time-consuming and costly. If these requirements divert the attention of our management and personnel from other business concerns, they could have an adverse effect on our business. The increased costs will decrease our net income or increase our net loss, and may require us to reduce costs in other areas of our business or increase the prices of our products or services. For example, we expect these rules and regulations to make it more difficult and more expensive for us to obtain director and officer liability insurance and we may be required to incur substantial costs to maintain the same or similar coverage. We cannot predict or estimate the amount or timing of additional costs we may incur to respond to these requirements. The impact of these requirements could also make it more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified persons to serve on our board of directors, our board committees or as executive ~~compensation; and~~

•~~compliance with the requirements of holding a nonbinding advisory vote on executive compensation and~~officers.

We are ~~also currently~~ a smaller reporting company, ~~but based on~~and we cannot be certain if the ~~market value of~~reduced reporting requirements applicable to smaller reporting companies will make our common stock ~~that was held by non-affiliates as of June 30, 2021, we have determined that we will no longer be~~less attractive to investors.

We are a smaller reporting company as ~~of January 1, 2022. However, for so long as we remain~~defined under SEC rules. As a smaller reporting company, we are ~~permitted and intend~~able to ~~rely on~~take advantage of certain exemptions from ~~certain~~ disclosure requirements, that are applicable to other public companies that are not smaller reporting companies. Similar to emerging growth companies, smaller reporting companies are able to provide simplified executive compensation disclosure and have certain otherincluding reduced disclosure obligations ~~including, among other things, being required to provide~~regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports and proxy statements and providing only two years of audited financial ~~statements~~statements. We cannot predict if investors will find our common stock less attractive because we may rely on these exemptions. If some investors find our common stock less attractive as a result, there may be a less active trading market for our common stock and ~~not being required~~our stock price may be more volatile.

If we fail to ~~provide selected~~maintain an effective system of internal control over financial ~~data, supplemental financial information or risk factors. As of January 1, 2022,~~reporting, we ~~will no longer~~may not be able to ~~rely~~accurately report our financial results or prevent fraud. As a result, stockholders could lose confidence in our financial and other public reporting, which would harm our business and the trading price of our common stock.

Effective internal controls over financial reporting are necessary for us to provide reliable financial reports and, together with adequate disclosure controls and procedures, are designed to prevent fraud. Any failure to implement required new or improved controls, or difficulties encountered in their implementation could cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations. In addition, any testing by us conducted in connection with Section 404, or any subsequent testing by our independent registered public accounting firm, may reveal deficiencies in our internal controls over financial reporting that are deemed to be material weaknesses or that may require prospective or retroactive changes to our financial statements or identify other areas for further attention or improvement. Inferior

internal controls could also cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information, which could have a negative effect on the trading price of our stock.

We are required to disclose changes made in our internal controls and procedures on a quarterly basis and our management is required to assess the effectiveness of these ~~reduced requirements.~~controls annually. An independent assessment of the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting could detect problems that our management’s assessment might not. Undetected material weaknesses in our internal controls over financial reporting could lead to restatements of our financial statements and require us to incur the expense of remediation.

Our disclosure controls and procedures may not prevent or detect all errors or acts of fraud.

Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to reasonably assure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC. We believe that any disclosure controls and procedures or internal controls and procedures, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people or by an unauthorized override of the controls. Accordingly, because of the inherent limitations in our control system, misstatements or insufficient disclosures due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

We have broad discretion over the use of our cash and cash equivalents and may not use them effectively.

Our management has broad discretion to use our cash and cash equivalents to fund our operations and could spend these funds in ways that do not improve our results of operations or enhance the value of our common stock. The failure by our management to apply these funds effectively could result in financial losses that could have a material adverse effect on our business, cause the price of our common stock to decline and delay the development of our product candidates. Pending our use to fund operations, we may invest our cash and cash equivalents in a manner that does not produce income or that loses value.

Risks Related to Charter and Bylaws

Anti-takeover provisions under our charter documents and Delaware law could delay or prevent a change of control which could limit the market price of our common stock and may prevent or frustrate attempts by our stockholders to replace or remove our current management.

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws contain provisions that could delay or prevent a change of control of our company or changes in our board of directors that our stockholders might consider favorable. Some of these provisions include:

•a board of directors divided into three classes serving staggered three-year terms, such that not all members of the board will be elected at one time;

•a prohibition on stockholder action through written consent, which requires that all stockholder actions be taken at a meeting of our stockholders;

•a requirement that special meetings of stockholders be called only by the board of directors acting pursuant to a resolution approved by the affirmative vote of a majority of the directors then in office;

•advance notice requirements for stockholder proposals and nominations for election to our board of directors;

•a requirement that no member of our board of directors may be removed from office by our stockholders except for cause and, in addition to any other vote required by law, upon the approval of not less than two-thirds of all outstanding shares of our voting stock then entitled to vote in the election of directors;

•a requirement of approval of not less than two-thirds of all outstanding shares of our voting stock to amend any bylaws by stockholder action or to amend specific provisions of our certificate of incorporation; and

•the authority of the board of directors to issue convertible preferred stock on terms determined by the board of directors without stockholder approval and which convertible preferred stock may include rights superior to the rights of the holders of common stock.

In addition, because we are incorporated in Delaware, we are governed by the provisions of Section 203 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, which may prohibit certain business combinations with stockholders owning 15% or more of our outstanding voting stock. These anti-takeover provisions and other

provisions in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws could make it more difficult for stockholders or potential acquirers to obtain control of our board of directors or initiate actions that are opposed by the then-current board of directors and could also delay or impede a merger, tender offer or proxy contest involving our company. These provisions could also discourage proxy contests and make it more difficult for you and other stockholders to elect directors of your choosing or cause us to take other corporate actions you desire. Any delay or prevention of a change of control transaction or changes in our board of directors could cause the market price of our common stock to decline.

Our amended and restated bylaws designate certain courts as the sole and exclusive forum for certain types of actions and proceedings that may be initiated by our stockholders, which could limit our stockholders’ ability to obtain a favorable judicial forum for disputes with us or our directors, officers, or employees.

Our amended and restated bylaws provide that, unless we consent in writing to an alternative forum, the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware will be the sole and exclusive forum for any state law claims for (i) any derivative action or proceeding brought on our behalf, (ii) any action asserting a claim of breach of fiduciary duty owed by any of our directors, officers and employees to us or our stockholders, (iii) any action asserting a claim arising pursuant to any provision of the DGCL, our amended and restated certificate of incorporation or our bylaws (in each case, as they may be amended from time to time) or (iv) any action asserting a claim that is governed by the internal affairs doctrine, in each case subject to the Court of Chancery having personal jurisdiction over the indispensable parties named as defendants therein; provided, however, that this exclusive forum provision will not apply to any causes of action arising under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, or any other claim for which the federal courts have exclusive jurisdiction; and provided further that, if and only if the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware dismisses any such action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, such action may be brought in another state or federal court sitting in the State of Delaware, or any other claim for which the federal courts have exclusive jurisdiction; and provided further that, if and only if the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware dismisses any such action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, such action may be brought in another state or federal court sitting in the State of Delaware. Our amended and restated bylaws also specify that unless we consent in writing to the selection of an alternate forum, the federal district courts of the United States shall be the exclusive forum for the resolution of any complaint asserting a cause of action arising under the Securities Act. Any person or entity purchasing or otherwise acquiring any interest in shares of our common stock is deemed to have notice of and consented to the foregoing provisions. We recognize that the forum selection clause in our bylaws may impose additional litigation costs on stockholders in pursuing any such claims. Additionally, the forum selection clause in our bylaws may limit our stockholders’ ability to bring a claim in a forum that they find favorable for disputes with us or our directors, officers or employees, which may discourage such lawsuits against us and our directors, officers and employees even though an action, if successful, might benefit our stockholders. The enforceability of similar choice of forum provisions in other companies’ governing documents has been challenged in legal proceedings, and it is possible that, in connection with any applicable action brought against us, a court could find the choice of forum provisions contained in our bylaws to be inapplicable or unenforceable in such action. If a court were to find the choice of forum provision contained in our bylaws to be inapplicable or unenforceable in an action, we may incur additional costs associated with resolving such action in other jurisdictions, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition, or results of operations.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Equity Securities

~~None.~~We did not make any sales of unregistered securities during the three months ended June 30, 2022.

Use of Proceeds from Public Offering of Common Stock

In October 2020, we completed the initial public offering of our common stock, or IPO, pursuant to which we issued and sold 11,500,000 shares of our common stock at a price to the public of $19.00 per share. We received aggregate gross proceeds from our IPO of approximately $218.5 million, or aggregate net cash proceeds of approximately $200.3 million after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and offering expenses.

All of the shares issued and sold in the IPO were registered under the Securities Act pursuant to a Registration Statement on Form S‑1 (File No. 333-249074), which was declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission ~~or the SEC,~~ on October 15, 2020. ~~There has been no material change in~~

Purchases of Equity Securities by the ~~planned use~~Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers

We did not make any repurchases of ~~proceeds from our IPO as described in our final prospectus filed pursuant to Rule 424(b)(4) under~~shares of common stock during the ~~Securities Act with the SEC on October 16, 2020.~~three months ended June 30, 2022.

3277

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

Not applicable.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.

Not applicable.

Item 5. Other Information.

~~None~~None.

3378

Item 6. Exhibits.



Exhibit Number						Description

3.1						Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-39620) filed on October 20, 2020).

3.2						Amended and Restated Bylaws of Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-39620) filed on January 7, 2022).

10.1						~~Retention Incentive Award Letter~~Transition Agreement dated ~~August 30, 2021,~~July 26, 2022, by and between Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. and Bernard Ravina~~(incorporated~~ (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant's Current R e ~~port~~Report on Form 8-K (File No. ~~001-39620)~~001-39620 ) filed on ~~August 30, 2021~~).July 26, 2022.

31.1*						Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2*						Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1**						Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

101.INS*						Inline XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH*						Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

101.CAL*						Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

101.DEF*						Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

101.LAB*						Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document

101.PRE*						Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

104						Cover Page Interactive Data File (embedded within the Inline XBRL document)

*Filed herewith.

** The certifications furnished in Exhibit 32.1 hereto are deemed to accompany this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and will not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Such certifications will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filings under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except to the extent that the Registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.

3479

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

PRAXIS PRECISION MEDICINES, INC.

Date:

~~November 3, 2021~~August 8, 2022

By:

/s/ Marcio Souza

Marcio Souza

Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer)

Date:

~~November 3, 2021~~August 8, 2022

By:

/s/ Timothy Kelly

Timothy Kelly

Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)

3580


	Series A Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock			Series B Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock			Series B-1 Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock			Series C Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock			Series C-1 Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock			Common Stock			Additional Paid-In Capital		Accumulated Deficit		Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss		Total Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)
	Shares	Amount		Shares	Amount		Shares	Amount		Shares	Amount		Shares	Amount		Shares	Amount
Balance at December 31, 2019	8,075,799	$	9,932	14,913,704	$	49,969	2,666,666	$	10,431	9,805,827	$	50,789	—	$	—	1,621,880	$	1	$	—	$	(81,009)	$	—	$	(81,008)
Repurchase of Series C redeemable convertible preferred stock	—	—		—	—		—	—		(5,825,243)	(30,493)		—	—		—	—		—		493		—		493
Series C redeemable convertible preferred stock issuance costs	—	—		—	—		—	—		—	(37)		—	—		—	—		—		—		—		—
Vesting of restricted common stock awards	—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		13,143	—		—		—		—		—
Stock-based compensation expense	—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		147		—		—		147
Accretion of redeemable convertible preferred stock to redemption value	—	160		—	890		—	199		—	815		—	—		—	—		(147)		(1,917)		—		(2,064)
Net loss	—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		—		(8,330)		—		(8,330)
Balance at March 31, 2020	8,075,799	$	10,092	14,913,704	$	50,859	2,666,666	$	10,630	3,980,584	$	21,074	—	$	—	1,635,023	$	1	$	—	$	(90,763)	$	—	$	(90,762)
Issuance of Series C redeemable convertible preferred stock, net of issuance costs of $4	—	—		—	—		—	—		4,563,108	23,496		—	—		—	—		—		—		—		—
Vesting of restricted common stock awards	—	—		—	��		—	—		—	—		—	—		13,142	—		—		—		—		—
Stock-based compensation expense	—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		285		—		—		285
Accretion of redeemable convertible preferred stock to redemption value	—	162		—	890		—	198		—	789		—	—		—	—		(285)		(1,754)		—		(2,039)
Net loss	—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		—		(11,568)		—		(11,568)
Balance at June 30, 2020	8,075,799	$	10,254	14,913,704	$	51,749	2,666,666	$	10,828	8,543,692	$	45,359	—	$	—	1,648,165	$	1	$	—	$	(104,085)	$	—	$	(104,084)
Issuance of Series C-1 redeemable convertible preferred stock, net of issuance costs of $154	—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		19,444,453	110,096		—	—		—		—		—		—
Vesting of restricted common stock awards	—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		13,142	—		—		—		—		—
Stock-based compensation expense	—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		953		—		—		953
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock options	—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		11,628	—		27		—		—		27
Accretion of redeemable convertible preferred stock to redemption value	—	162		—	899		—	201		—	885		—	1,796		—	—		(980)		(2,963)		—		(3,943)
Net Loss	—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		—		(16,216)		—		(16,216)
Balance at September 30, 2020	8,075,799	$	10,416	14,913,704	$	52,648	2,666,666	$	11,029	8,543,692	$	46,244	19,444,453	$	111,892	1,672,935	$	1	$	—	$	(123,264)	$	—	$	(123,263)


	As of December 31, 2020
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Assets:
Cash equivalents:
Money market funds	$	290,931	$	—	$	—	$	290,931
	$	290,931	$	—	$	—	$	290,931


Year Ended December 31,	Future Lease Payments
2021	$	—
2022	1,160
2023	1,270
2024	1,296
2025	1,321
2026	110
Total future lease payments	$	5,157
Less: interest	(942)
Present value of operating lease liabilities	$	4,215