UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q/A10-Q
Amendment no. 1

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 20092010

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission file number: 000-094590896898

NEW CENTURY COMPANIES,U.S. AEROSPACE, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 
Delaware0610345870610345787
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)

9831 Romandel Ave.
Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670
 (Address of principal executive offices)

(562) 906-8455
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Not applicableNew Century Companies, Inc.
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes ¨x  No x¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes  ¨    No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Large accelerated filer¨
Accelerated filer¨
Non-accelerated filer¨
Smaller reporting company x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨  No x

As of August 17, 2009,May 7, 2010, the Company had 15,344,65424,727,640 shares of common stock, $0.10 par value, issued and outstanding.

 
 

 

Explanatory NoteU.S. AEROSPACE, INC.

We are filing this Amendment to Form 10-Q for the three-month period ended March 31, 2009, to restate the condensed consolidated financial statements and all the disclosures accordingly.INDEX

In connection with the preparation of our condensed consolidated financial statements for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, we discovered errors in our valuation of our derivative liabilities, certain contract related balances and a classification error, which we reported for the three-month period ended March 31, 2009, and needed to be restated. Specifically, the condensed consolidated financial statements are being restated to (i) change the valuation of our derivative liabilities, (ii) decrease the previously reported change in warrant value during the quarter ended March 31, 2009, and (iii) adjust our revenues, cost of sales, costs in excess of billings and billings in excess of costs in connection with our contract accounting.  For additional detail related to such restatement, please see Note 6 of the condensed consolidated financial statements included in this Form 10-Q/A for the period ended March 31, 2009.
Page No.
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial StatementsF-1
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets - March 31, 2010 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2009F-1
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited) -
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009F-2
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) -
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009F-3
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial StatementsF-4
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations4
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk7
Item 4T. Controls and Procedures7
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings8
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds8
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities8
Item 5. Other Information9
Item 6. Exhibits9
SIGNATURES10
 
In addition, we filed our Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 before our prior independent registered public accounting firm completed its review of the condensed consolidated financial statements for the period then ended.
2


Forward-Looking Statements

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A10-Q contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. For example, statements regarding the Company’s financial position, business strategy and other plans and objectives for future operations, and assumptions and predictions about future product demand, supply, manufacturing, costs, marketing and pricing factors are all forward-looking statements. These statements are generally accompanied by words such as “intend,” anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “potential(ly),” “continue,” “forecast,” “predict,” “plan,” “may,” “will,” “could,” “would,” “should,” “expect” or the negative of such terms or other comparable terminology. The Company believes that the assumptions and expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, based on information available to it on the date hereof, but the Company cannot provide assurances that these assumptions and expectations will prove to have been correct or that the Company will take any action that the Company may presently be planning. However, these forward-looking statements are inherently subject to known and unknown risks and uncertainties. Actual results or experience may differ materially from those expected or anticipated in the forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, regulatory policies, available cash, research results, competition from other similar businesses, and market and general economic factors. This discussion should be read in conjunction with the condensed consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A.10-Q.

 
1


NEW CENTURY COMPANIES, INC.

INDEX

Page No.
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial StatementsF-1
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets - March 31, 2009 (Restated) (Unaudited) and December 31, 2008F-1
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (Restated) (Unaudited) - Three Months Ended March 31, 2009 and 2008F-2
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Restated) (Unaudited) - Three Months Ended March 31, 2009 and 2008F-3
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial StatementsF-4
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations3
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk7
Item 4T. Controls and Procedures7
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings9
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds9
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities9
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders9
Item 5. Other Information9
Item 6. Exhibits9
SIGNATURES10

2

 



Part I - Financial Information

ITEM 1.  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


NEW CENTURY COMPANIES,U.S. AEROSPACE, INC.  AND SUBSIDIARYSUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
March 31, 20092010 and December 31, 2008

  (Unaudited)    
  March 31,  December 31, 
  2009  2008 
  
(Restated - See
Note 6)
    
       
ASSETS      
       
Current Assets      
Cash $268,095  $31,889 
Contract receivables, net of allowance of $0 and $24,000 for March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively  334,391   237,787 
Inventories  412,889   564,022 
Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts  102,028   416,664 
Deferred financing costs  370,933   252,305 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  165,933   168,668 
         
Total current assets  1,654,269   1,671,335 
         
Property and Equipment, net  172,876   186,906 
Deferred Financing Costs, net  173,803   233,702 
         
Total Assets $2,000,948  $2,091,943 
         
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT        
         
Current Liabilities        
Bank overdraft $32,152  $15,329 
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities  1,519,171   1,417,464 
Dividends payable  459,275   459,275 
Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts  607,061   1,388,348 
Capital lease obligation, current portion  28,542   27,874 
Derivative liability  4,306,028   1,975,298 
CAMOFI Convertible note payable, net of discount of $1,756,612 at March 31, 2009 and $2,089,443 at December 31, 2008, respectively  1,070,670   737,838 
CAMHZN Convertible note payable, net of discount of $294,813 at March 31, 2009 and $350,090 at December 31, 2008, respectively  455,187   399,910 
CAMOFI Convertible Note, net of discount of $288,039  413,161   - 
CAMHZN Convertible Note, net of discount of $71,778  102,022   - 
         
Total current liabilities  8,993,269   6,421,336 
         
Long Term Liabilities        
Capital lease obligation, long term portion  2,482   9,804 
         
Total  liabilities  8,995,751   6,431,140 
         
Commitments and Contingencies        
         
Stockholders' Deficit        
Cumulative, convertible, Series B preferred stock, $1 par value, 15,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued and outstanding (liquidation preference of $25 per share)  -   - 
Cumulative, convertible, Series C preferred stock, $1 par value, 75,000 shares authorized, 26,880 shares issued and outstanding (liquidation preference of $672,000)  26,880   26,880 
Cumulative, convertible, Series D preferred stock, $25 par value, 75,000 shares authorized, 11,640 shares issued and outstanding (liquidation preference of $291,000)  291,000   291,000 
Common stock, $0.10 par value, 50,000,000 shares authorized; 15,344,654  shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008  1,534,466   1,534,466 
Notes receivable from stockholders  (564,928)  (564,928)
Deferred equity compensation  (81,667)  (101,667)
Additional paid-in capital  7,355,007   7,355,007 
Accumulated deficit  (15,555,561)  (12,879,955)
         
Total stockholders' deficit  (6,994,803)  (4,339,197)
         
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' deficit $2,000,948  $2,091,943 
2009


See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.

F-1


NEW CENTURY COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2009 and 2008
(Unaudited)

  For the Three Months Ended March 31, 
  (Restated - See Note 6) 
  2009  2008 
       
CONTRACT REVENUES $1,054,702  $1,526,602 
         
COST OF SALES  818,893   1,308,479 
         
GROSS PROFIT  235,809   218,123 
         
OPERATING EXPENSES        
Consulting and other compensation  62,615   271,384 
Salaries and related  153,087   53,496 
Selling, general and administrative  232,021   438,029 
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES  447,723   762,909 
         
OPERATING LOSS  (211,914)  (544,786)
         
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSES)        
Gain on writeoff of accounts payable  5,681   56,628 
(Loss) / gain on valuation of derivative liabilities  (1,800,978)  1,300,762 
Interest expense  (668,395)  (486,769)
         
TOTAL OTHER INCOME (EXPENSES)  (2,463,692)  870,621 
         
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES  (2,675,606)  325,835 
         
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES  -   - 
         
NET INCOME ( LOSS) $(2,675,606) $325,835 
         
NET INCOME (LOSS) APPLICABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS $(2,675,606) $325,835 
         
Basic net income (loss) available to common stockholders per common share $(0.17) $0.02 
         
Diluted net income (loss) available to common stockholders per common share $(0.17) $0.01 
         
Basic weighted average common shares outstanding  15,344,654   14,033,089 
         
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding  15,344,654   41,981,711 

 (Unaudited)    
 March 31,  December 31, 
 2010  2009 
ASSETS    
      
Current Assets     
Cash $7,205  $157,633 
Accounts receivable  132,088   71,120 
Loan receivable from employees  63,050   - 
Inventories  301,066   284,339 
Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts  15,132   5,725 
Deferred financing costs, current portion  93,392   150,251 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  341,087   7,738 
         
Total current assets  953,020   676,806 
         
Property and equipment, net  1,103,776   716,864 
Goodwill  2,401,342   2,359,121 
Other intangible assets, net  1,392,857   1,446,429 
Deferred financing costs, long-term portion  87,943   92,338 
Other assets  151,790   151,790 
         
Total Assets $6,090,728  $5,443,348 
         
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT     
         
Current Liabilities        
Bank overdraft $9,195  $7,515 
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities  4,205,828   3,856,316 
Derivative liability  -   48,378 
Dividends payable  204,600   204,600 
Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts  157,953   149,849 
Capital lease obligations  953,843   752,957 
Loan payable and accrued interest, net of discount of $0 at March 31, 2010  164,566   145,563 
and $10,003 at December 31, 2009        
Notes payable and accrued interest  87,148   115,544 
Notes payable to related parties and accrued interest  594,743   545,356 
Convertible notes payable and accrued interest , net of discounts of $1,056,786 at        
March 31, 2010 and $1,350,164 at December 31, 2009  5,156,754   4,341,613 
         
         
Total Liabilities  11,534,630   10,167,691 
         
         
Commitments and Contingencies        
         
Stockholders' Deficit        
Cumulative, convertible, Series B preferred stock, $1 par value,        
15,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued and outstanding        
(liquidation preference of $25 per share)  -   - 
Cumulative, convertible, Series C preferred stock, $1 par value,        
75,000 shares authorized, 26,880 shares issued and outstanding        
(liquidation preference of $672,000 at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009)  26,880   26,880 
Cumulative, convertible, Series D preferred stock, $25 par value,        
75,000 shares authorized, 11,640 shares issued and outstanding        
(liquidation preference of $495,600 at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009)  291,000   291,000 
Common stock, $0.10 par value, 250,000,000 shares authorized;        
23,991,640  shares issued and outstanding        
at March 31, 2010 and 22,430,211 at December 31, 2009  2,399,165   2,243,022 
Deferred equity compensation  (11,669)  (29,169)
Notes receivable from stockholders  (584,691)  (584,691)
Additional paid-in capital  21,068,514   20,167,283 
Accumulated deficit  (28,633,101)  (26,838,668)
         
Total Stockholders' Deficit  (5,443,902)  (4,724,343)
         
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Deficit $6,090,728  $5,443,348 

See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.

 
F-1


U.S. AEROSPACE, INC.  AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009
(Unaudited)
  For the Three Months Ended March 31, 
  2010  2009 
       
Net revenues $557,690  $1,054,702 
         
Cost of sales  692,648   818,893 
         
Gross (loss) profit  (134,958)  235,809 
         
Operating expenses:        
Consulting and other compensation  198,348   62,615 
Salaries and related  274,016   153,087 
Selling, general and administrative  398,738   232,021 
         
Total operating expenses  871,102   447,723 
         
Operating loss  (1,006,060)  (211,914)
         
Other income (expenses), net:        
Gain on write-off of accounts payable  5,332   5,681 
Gain on disposal of assets  190,754   - 
Loss on valuation of derivative liabilities  (11,253)  (1,800,978)
Interest expense  (973,206)  (668,395)
         
Total other expenses, net  (788,373)  (2,463,692)
         
Net loss $(1,794,433) $(2,675,606)
         
Basic and diluted net loss per common share $(0.08) $(0.17)
         
Basic and diluted weighted average common shares outstanding  23,536,005   15,344,654 
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
F-2

 

NEW CENTURY COMPANIES,U.S. AEROSPACE, INC.  AND SUBSIDIARYSUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 20092010 and 20082009
(Unaudited)
 

  (Restated - See Note 6) 
  2009  2008 
       
Cash flows from operating activities:      
Net (loss) income $(2,675,606) $325,835 
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash used in operating activities:        
Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment  14,030   20,757 
Gain on write off of accounts payable  (5,681)  (56,628)
Amortization of deferred financing costs  116,271   89,574 
Amortization of stock-based consulting fees and employee compensation  20,000   125,343 
Amortization of BCF and debt discount  508,044   251,894 
Estimated fair value of common stock issued for services  -   75,000 
(Gain) / loss on valuation of derivatives liabilities  1,800,978   (1,300,962)
         
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:        
Contracts receivable  (96,604)  (60,178)
Inventories  151,133   170,900 
Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts  314,636   (22,635)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  2,735   (222,867)
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities  157,388   (94,354)
Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts  (781,287)  410,089 
         
Net cash used in operating activities  (473,963)  (288,232)
         
Cash flows from financing activities:        
Bank overdraft  16,823   12,699 
Proceeds from issuance of convertible notes payable, net of financing costs  700,000   - 
Principal payments on notes payable and capital lease  (6,654)  (6,196)
         
Net cash provided by financing activities  710,169   6,503 
         
Net change  in cash  236,206   (281,729)
         
Cash at beginning of period  31,889   281,729 
         
Cash at end of period $268,095  $- 
         
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash financing and investing activities:        
         
Debt discount recorded on convertible notes payable $479,752  $923,610 


  For the Three Months Ended March 31, 
  2010  2009 
       
Cash flows from operating activities:      
Net loss $(1,794,433) $(2,675,606)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:        
Depreciation and amortization  146,148   14,030 
Gain on write-off of accounts payable  (5,332)  (5,681)
Gain on disposal of assets  (190,754)  - 
Amortization of deferred financing costs  61,254   116,271 
Amortization of stock-based consulting fees  104,999   20,000 
Amortization of debt discount  708,381   508,044 
Estmated fair value of common stock issued for services  147,143   - 
Loss on valuation of  derivative liabilities  11,253   1,800,978 
         
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:        
Accounts receivable  (60,968)  (96,604)
Loan receivable from employees  (63,050)  - 
Inventories  (16,727)  151,133 
Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts  (9,407)  314,636 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  (848)  2,735 
Accounts payable, accrued liabilities and accrued interest  550,653   157,388 
Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts  8,104   (781,287)
         
Net cash used in operating activities  (403,584)  (473,963)
         
Cash flows from financing activities:        
Bank overdraft  1,680   16,823 
Proceeds from issuance of convertible notes payable, net  350,000   700,000 
Principal payments on notes payable to related parties  (1,000)  - 
Proceeds from issuance of notes payable to related parties  44,138   - 
Principal payments on notes payable and capital leases  (141,662)  (6,654)
         
Net cash provided by financing activities  253,156   710,169 
         
Net (decrease) increase  in cash  (150,428)  236,206 
         
Cash at beginning of period  157,633   31,889 
         
Cash at end of period $7,205  $268,095 
         
         
Supplemental schedule of cash flow information:        
Interest paid $14,915  $- 
         
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash financing and investing activities:        
Debt discount recorded on convertible notes payable $405,000  $479,752 
         
Conversion of convertible notes payable $25,600  $- 
         
Purchase of property and equipment through capital lease $479,488  $- 
         
Payment of accounts payable with proceeds from convertible notes payable $55,000  $- 
         
Estimated fair value of warrants issued in connection with consulting service agreement $420,000  $- 
         
Reclassification of the estimated fair value of warrants from derivative liabilities to additional paid-in capital $59,631  $- 
         
Addition to goodwill for adjustment in net liabilities assumed in acquisition $42,221  $- 
 
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.

 
F-3

 

NEW CENTURY COMPANIES,U.S. AEROSPACE, INC.  AND SUBSIDIARYSUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (RESTATED)
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 20092010 AND 20082009


 
1. ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Organization andAnd Nature ofOf Operations

On April 26, 2010 New Century Companies, Inc. and, a Delaware corporation (“New Century”), changed its name to U.S. Aerospace, Inc. (“U.S. Aerospace” or the “Company”). The Company was incorporated in Delaware on August 1, 1980. Its wholly owned subsidiary, New Century Remanufacturing Inc., (collectively, the "Company"), a California corporation, was incorporated in March 1996 and is located in Southern California. On October 9, 2009, New Century entered into a share exchange agreement with Precision Aerostructures, Inc. (“PAI”) pursuant to which the sole shareholder of PAI agreed to transfer all capital stock of PAI to New Century (see Note 3).  Collectively, U. S. Aerospace and its wholly owned subsidiaries are referred to as the “Company”. The Company is engaged in the production of aircraft assemblies, structural components, and highly engineered, precision machined details for the United States Department of Defense, United States Air Force, Lockheed Martin Corporation, The Boeing Company, L-3 Communications Holdings, Inc., the Middle River Aircraft Systems subsidiary of General Electric Company, and other aircraft manufacturers, aerospace companies, and defense contractors. The Company also provides after-market services, including rebuilding, retrofitting and remanufacturing of metal cutting machinery.  Once completed, a remanufactured machine is "like new"“like new” with state-of-the-art computers and the cost to the Company's customersCompany’s customer is substantially less than the price of a new machine.

The Company currently sells its services by direct sales and through a network of machinery dealers primarily in the United States. Its customers are generally medium to large sized manufacturing companies in various industries where metal cutting is an integral part of their businesses. The Company grants credit to its customers who are predominately located in the western United States.

The Company trades on the OTC Bulletin Board under the symbol "NCNC.""USAE.OB".

Principles ofOf Consolidation

The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of New Century Companies, Inc.U.S. Aerospace and its wholly owned subsidiary,subsidiaries, New Century Remanufacturing, Inc. and PAI.  All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information

The Company has adopted the authoritative guidance for disclosures about segments of an enterprise and related information. The guidance requires the Company to report information about segments of its business in annual financial statements and requires it to report selected segment information in its quarterly reports issued to stockholders.  The guidance also requires entity-wide disclosures about the products and services an entity provides, the material countries in which it holds assets and reports revenues and its major customers. The Company’s two reportable segments are managed separately based on fundamental differences in their operations.  At March 31, 2010, the Company operated in the following two reportable segments (see Note 10):

(a) CNC machine tool remanufacturing and
 (b) Multiaxis structural aircraft components.

The Company evaluates performance and allocates resources based upon operating income. The accounting policies of the reportable segments are the same as those described in this summary of significant accounting policies.

F-4

Basis ofOf Presentation

The accompanying unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared by the Company pursuant to the rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"). Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) have been omitted pursuant to such SEC rules and regulations; nevertheless, the Company believes that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. These financial statements and the notes hereto should be read in conjunction with the financial statements, accounting policies and notes thereto included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008,2009, filed with the SEC. In the opinion of management, all adjustments necessary to present fairly, in accordance with GAAP, the Company's consolidated financial position as of March 31, 2009,2010, and the consolidated results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods presented, have been made.  Such adjustments consist only of normal recurring adjustments.  The results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 20092010 are not necessarily indicative of the results for the full year ending December 31, 2009.2010. Amounts related to disclosure of December 31, 20082009 balances within these interim condensed consolidated financial statements were derived from the audited 20082009 consolidated financial statements and notes thereto.

Restatements

The accompanying balance sheet as of March 31, 2009 and the statements of operations and cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 have been restated – see Note 6.

F-4


Reclassifications

The Company has reclassified the presentation of prior-year information to conform to the current presentation.

Going Concern

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates, among other things, the realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. As of and the for the three months ended March 31, 2009,2010, the Company has a net loss of approximately $1,794,000, an accumulated deficit of approximately $15,556,000, had recurring losses, a$28,633,000, working capital deficit of approximately $7,339,000,$10,582,000 and was also in default on twoseveral notes payable (see Note 6) and had events of default on its convertible notes.CAMOFI and CAMHZN debt (see Note 5).   These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. The Company intends to fund operations through anticipated increased sales along with renegotiated or new debt and equity financing arrangements which management believes may be insufficient to fund its capital expenditures, working capital and other cash requirements for the year ending December 31, 2009.2010. Therefore, the Company will be required to seek additional funds to finance its long-term operations.operations in the form of debt and equity financing which the Company believes is available to it.  The successful outcome of future activities cannot be determined at this time and there is no assurance that if achieved, the Company will have sufficient funds to execute its intended business plan or generate positive operating results.
 
In response to these problems, management has taken the following actions:
·
The Company continues·continued its aggressive program for selling machines.its products;
·
The Company continues·continued to implement plans to further reduce operating costs.costs; and
·
The Company ·is seeking investment capital through the public and private markets.
·
The Company is seeking strategic acquisition candidates.

The condensed consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments to the carrying amounts related to recoverability and classification of asset carrying amountsassets or the amount and classification of liabilities that might result should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.
Reclassifications
The Company has reclassified the presentation of prior-year information to conform to the current period presentation.

F-5


Inventories

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or net realizable value. Cost is determined under the first-in, first-out method. Inventories represent cost of work in process on units not yet under contract. Cost includes all direct material and labor, machinery, subcontractors and allocations of indirect overhead. At each balance sheet date, the Company evaluates its ending inventories for excess quantities and obsolescence. Among other factors, the Company considers historical demand and forecasted demand in relation to the inventory on hand and market conditions when determining obsolescence and net realizable value. Provisions are made to reduce excess or obsolete inventories to their estimated net realizable values. Once established, write-downs are considered permanent adjustments to the cost basis of the excess or obsolete inventories. As of March 31, 2010, inventories consist of $167,206 of work-in-process and $133,860 of finished goods. 

Revenue Recognition

The Company's revenues consist primarily of contracts with customers. The Company uses the percentage-of-completion method of accounting to account for long-term contracts pursuant to Statements of Position 81-1, “Accounting for Performance of Construction-Type and Certain Production-Type Contracts,”U.S. accounting standards, and, therefore, takes into account the cost, estimated earnings and revenue to date on fixed-fee contracts not yet completed. The percentage-of-completion method is used because management considers total cost to be the best available measure of progress on the contracts. Because of inherent uncertainties in estimating costs, it is at least reasonably possible that the estimates used will change within the near term.

For contracts, the amount of revenue recognized at the consolidated financial statement date is the portion of the total contract price that the cost expended to date bears to the anticipated final cost, based on current estimates of cost to complete. Contract costs include all materials, direct labor, machinery, subcontract costs and allocations of indirect overhead.

F-5


Because contracts may extend over a period of time, changes in job performance, changes in job conditions and revisions of estimates of cost and earnings during the course of the work are reflected in the accounting period in which the facts that require the revision become known. At the time a loss on a contract becomes known, the entire amount of the estimated ultimate loss is recognized in the consolidated financial statements.

Contracts that are substantially complete are considered closed for financial statement purposes. Costs incurred and revenue earned on contracts in progress in excess of billings (under billings) are classified as a current asset. Amounts billed in excess of costs and revenue earned (over billings) are classified as a current liability.

For revenues from stock inventory, the Company follows Staff Accounting Bulletin ("SAB") No. 104, "Revenue Recognition,"U.S accounting standards, which outlinesoutline the basic criteria that must be met to recognize revenue other than revenue on contacts,contracts, and provides guidance for presentation of this revenue and for disclosure related to these revenue recognition policies in financial statements filed with the SEC. The Company recognizes revenue from stock inventory when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, title transfer has occurred, or services have been performed, the price is fixed or readily determinable and collectibility is probable.

The Company accounts for shipping and handling fees and costs in accordance with EITF Issue No. 00-10, "Accounting for Shipping and Handling Fees and Costs."U.S. accounting standards. Shipping and handling fees and costs incurred by the Company are immaterial to the operations of the Company and are included in cost of sales.

In accordance with Statements of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 48, "Revenue Recognition when Right of Return Exists,"U.S. accounting standards, revenue is recorded net of an estimate for markdowns and price concessions and warranty costs.concessions. Such reserve is based on management's evaluation of historical experience, current industry trends and estimated costs. As of March 31, 2009,2010, the Company estimated the markdowns and price concessions and warranty costs and concluded amounts are immaterial and did not record any adjustment to revenues.

F-6


Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the condensed consolidated financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Significant estimates made by management are, among others, deferred tax asset valuation allowances, realization of inventories, collectibility of receivables, recoverability of long-lived assets, accrued warranty costs, payroll and income tax penalties, the valuation of conversion options, stock options and warrants and the estimation of costs for long-term construction contracts. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Warranty

The Company provides a warranty on certain products sold. Estimated future warranty obligations related to certain products and services are provided by charges to operations in the period in which the related revenue is recognized. At March 31, 20092010 and December 31, 2008,2009, the warranty obligation balance was $15,160approximately $136,000 and $50,000,$137,000, respectively. There were no amountsAmounts charged to warranty expense in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations duringwas approximately $3,000 and $0 for the three months ended March 31, 2009.2010 and 2009, respectively.

ConcentrationsConcentration of Credit Risks

Cash is maintained at various financial institutions. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) insures accounts at each financial institution for up to $250,000 for March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008.$250,000. At times, cash may be in excess of the FDIC insured limit of $250,000.limit. The Company did not have any significant uninsured bank balances at March 31, 20092010 and December 31, 2008.2009. The Company has not experienced any losses in such accounts and believes it is not exposed to any significant credit risks on cash.

The Company sells products to customers throughout the United States. The Company’s ability to collect receivables is affected by economic fluctuations in the geographic areas served by the Company. Although the Company does not obtain collateral with which to secure its accounts receivable, management periodically reviews accounts receivable and assesses the financial strength of its customers and, as a consequence, believes that the receivable credit risk exposure could, at times, be material to the condensed consolidated financial statements.

The Company maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts for balances that appear to have specific collection issues. The collection process is based on the age of the invoice and requires attempted contacts with the customer at specified intervals. If, after a specified number of days, the Company has been unsuccessful in its collection efforts, a bad debt allowance is recorded for the balance in question. Delinquent accounts receivable are charged against the allowance for doubtful accounts once uncollectibility has been determined. The factors considered in reaching this determination are the apparent financial condition of the customer and the Company’s success in contacting and negotiating with the customer. If the financial condition of the Company’s customers were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of ability to make payments, additional allowances may be required.

Management reviews the collectibility of receivables periodically and believes that the allowance for doubtful accounts for the period ended March 31, 2010 and the year ended December 31, 2009 is adequate. There was no allowance for doubtful accounts at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009.

During the periodthree months ended March 31, 2010, sales to one customer approximated 55% of net revenues. Further, there was one customer that accounted for approximately 80% of accounts receivable at March 31, 2010.

During the three months ended March 31, 2009, sales to two customers accounted for approximately 46% of net sales.  Further, there were no customers that accounted for a significant amount of receivables at March 31, 2009.
revenues.
During the period ended March 31, 2008, sales to two customers accounted for approximately 64% of net sales. 

Management reviews the collectability of contract receivables periodically and believes that the allowance for doubtful accounts for period ended March 31, 2009 and the year ended December 31, 2008 is adequate. There was no allowance for doubtful accounts at March 31, 2009 and $24,000 at December 31, 2008.

 
F-6F-7

 

Use of Estimates

In the opinion of management, the accompanying balance sheets and related statements of operations and cash flows include all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring items, necessary for their fair presentation in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.   The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods.  Significant estimates made by management are, among others, deferred tax asset valuation allowances, realization of inventories, collectability of contracts receivable, the estimation of costs for long-term construction contracts and the valuation of conversion options, stock options and warrants.  Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Basic andAnd Diluted Loss Per Common Share

Basic net earnings (loss)loss per share is computed by dividing net income (loss)loss by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted net income (loss)loss per share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of common shares and dilutive common stock equivalents outstanding for each respective period.year.

Common stock equivalents, representing convertible Preferred Stock, convertible debt, options and warrants totaling approximately 150,968,000 and 61,821,000 shares atfor March 31, 2010 and 2009, (restated)respectively, are not included in the computation of diluted loss per share as they would be anti-dilutive. Common stock equivalents, representing convertible Preferred Stock, convertible debt, options and warrants totaling approximately 27,949,000 shares are included in the diluted loss per share at March 31, 2008.

Stock Based Compensation

Effective January 1, 2006, we adoptedThe Company uses the fair value method of accounting for employee stock compensation cost pursuant to SFAS No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment.” Under the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS 123(R), share-basedcost. Share-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the fair value of the award and is recognized as expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period, which is the vesting period.  For the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, and 2008, no employee share-based compensation expense was recognized in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations.

From time to time, the Company's Board of Directors grants common share purchase options or warrants to selected directors, officers, employees, consultants and advisors in payment of goods or services provided by such persons on a stand-alone basis outside of any of the Company's formal stock plans. The terms of these grants are individually negotiated and generally expire within five years from the grant date.

Under the terms of the Company's 2000 Stock Option Plan, options to purchase an aggregate of 5,000,000 shares of common stock may be issued to officers, key employees and consultants of the Company. The exercise price of any option generally may not be less than the fair market value of the shares on the date of grant. The term of each option generally may not be more than five years.

There is no share-based compensation resulting from the application of SFAS No. 123R to options granted outside of the Company's Stock Option Plan for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008. Share-based compensation recognized as a result of the adoption of SFAS No. 123R use the Black Scholes option pricing model for estimating fair value of options granted.

In accordance with SFAS No. 123R,U.S. accounting standards, the Company’s policy is to adjust share-based compensation on a quarterly basis for changes to the estimate of expected award forfeitures based on actual forfeiture experience.

F-7


The fair value of stock-based awards to employees and directors is calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, even though the model was developed to estimate the fair value of freely tradable, fully transferable options without vesting restriction, which differ significantly from the Company's stock options. The Black-Scholes model also requires subjective assumptions regarding future stock price volatility and expected time to exercise, which greatly affect the calculated values. The expected term of options granted is derived from historical data on employee exercises and post-vesting employment termination behavior. The risk-free rate selected to value any particular grant is based on the U.S. Treasury rate that corresponds to the pricing term of the grant effective as of the date of the grant. The expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of ourthe Company’s common stock. These factors could change in the future, affecting the determination of stock-based compensation expense in future periods.

There were no options granted, exercised or cancelled during the periodthree months ended March 31, 2009.2010.   There were 1,700,000 shares available for grant at March 31, 2010. 

F-8

 
OptionsAll options outstanding that have vested and are expected to vest as of March 31, 20092010 and are as follows:

         Weighted    
      Weighted  Average    
      Average  Remaining  Aggregate 
   Number of  Exercise  Contractual  Intrinsic 
   Shares  Price  Term in Years  Value (1) 
              
Vested  3,450,000  $0.17   1.74  $ 
Expected to vest (2)  650,000  $0.08   0.16  $ 
Total   4,100,000         $ 
              Weighted       
         Weighted    Average       
         Average    Remaining    Aggregate  
    Number of    Exercise    Contractual    Intrinsic  
    Shares    Price    Term in Years    Value (1)  
             
Vested  7,400,000  $0.12   1.82  $134,000 
 
(1)Represents the added value asapproximate difference between the exercise price and the closing market price of the Company's common stock at the end of the reporting period (as of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008,2010 the market price of the Company's common stock was $0.08 and $0.05, respectively)$0.12).
(2)The 650,000 options became fully vested on April 8, 2009 and are valued at $35,014 based on the stock market price of the shares at the contract date.

The Company follows SFAS No. 123(R) (as interpreted by EITF Issue No. 96-18, "Accounting for Equity Instruments That Are Issued To Other Than Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling, Goods or Services") to accountaccounts for transactions involving services provided by third parties where the Company issues equity instruments as part of the total consideration. Pursuant to paragraph 7 of SFAS No. 123 (R), the Company accounts for such transactionsconsideration using the fair value of the consideration received (i.e. the value of the goods or services) or the fair value of the equity instruments issued, whichever is more reliably measurable. The Company applies EITF Issue No. 96-18 inIn transactions when the value of the goods and/or services are not readily determinable, the fair value of the equity instruments is more reliably measurable and the counterparty receives equity instruments in full or partial settlement of the transactions, usingthe Company uses the following methodology:

a) For transactions where goods have already been delivered or services rendered, the equity instruments are issued on or about the date the performance is complete (and valued on the date of issuance).

b) For transactions where the instruments are issued on a fully vested, non-forfeitable basis, the equity instruments are valued on or about the date of the contract.

c) For any transactions not meeting the criteria in (a) or (b) above, the Company re-measures the consideration at each reporting date based on its then current stock value.

F-8


The following table summarizes information related to stock options outstanding at March 31, 2009:

Exercise Price   
Number of
Options
outstanding
    
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life (Years)
    
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
  
$ 0.075-0.083   1,300,000   0.32  $0.08 
              
$ 0.15-0.20   2,800,000   1.42  $0.19 
              
    4,100,000      $0.15 

From time to time, the Company issues warrants to employees and to third parties pursuant to various agreements, which are not approved by the shareholders.

The following is a status of the warrants outstanding at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008:

    Outstanding Warrants 
      Weighted  Aggregate 
   Number of  Average  Intrinsic 
   Shares  Exercise Price  Value (1) 
          
December 31, 2008  5,586,824  $0.21  $ 
             
Grants          
           
Exercises          
             
Cancellations/ Terminated         
             
Outstanding and Exercisable at            
March 31, 2009  5,586,824  $0.21    
(1)Represents the added value as difference between the exercise price and the closing market price of the Company's common stock at the end of the reporting period (as of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the market price of the Company's common stock was $0.08 and $0.05, respectively).

F-9


The following table summarizes information related to warrants outstanding and exercisable at March 31, 2009:

Exercise Price  
Number of
Warrants
outstanding
  
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life (Years)
  
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
 
$ 0.60-0.70   1,372,538   0.78  $0.64 
              
$ 0.07   4,214,286   3.58  $0.07 
              
    5,586,824      $0.21 

Deferred Financing Costs

Direct costs of securing debt financing are capitalized and amortized over the term of the related debt. When a loan is paid in full, any unamortized financing costs are removed from the related accounts and charged to interest expense.operations. During the three months ended March 31, 20092010 and 2008,2009, the Company amortized approximately $61,000 and $116,000, respectively, of deferred financing costs in addition to amounts described in Note 3 of approximately $3,000 and $6,000, respectively, to interest expense.expense in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations.

Fair Value Measurements

The Company adopted SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements,” in the first quarter of fiscal 2008.  SFAS 157 was amended in February 2008 by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Staff Position (“FSP”) FAS No. 157-1, “Application of FASB Statement No. 157 to FASB Statement No. 13 and Its Related Interpretive Accounting Pronouncements That Address Leasing Transactions,” and by FSP FAS 157-2, “Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157,” which delayed the Company’s application of SFAS 157 for nonrecurring nonfinancial assets and liabilities until January 1, 2009. FAS 157 was further amended in October 2008 by FSP FAS 157-3, “Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset When the Market for That Asset Is Not Active”, which clarifies the application of SFAS 157 to assets participating in inactive markets.

Implementation of SFAS 157 did not have a material effect on the Company’s results of operations or financial position and had no effect on the Company’s existing fair-value measurement practices. However, SFAS 157 requiresU.S. accounting standards require disclosure of a fair-value hierarchy of inputs the Company uses to value an asset or a liability. The three levels of the fair-value hierarchy are described as follows:

Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets and liabilities. For the Company, Level 1 inputs include quoted prices on the Company’s securities that are actively traded.

F-9


Level 2: Inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly. For the Company, Level 2 inputs include assumptions such as estimated life, risk free rate and volatility estimates used in determining the fair values of the Company’s option and warrant securities issued.

Level 3: Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability. Beginning January 1, 2009, Level 3 inputs may be required for the determination of fair value associated with certain nonrecurring measurements of nonfinancial assets and liabilities. The Company does not currently present any nonfinancial assets or liabilities at fair value.

Determining which category an asset or liability falls within the hierarchy requires significant judgment. The Company evaluates its hierarchy disclosures each quarter.  Liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized as follows (unaudited) (restated):

F-10


         March 31, 
   Level 1  Level 2  Level 3  2009 
         
Fair Value of derivative liability    $  $4,306,028  $4,306,028 
The Company has no assets or liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis.basis as of March 31, 2010. There were no assets or liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis during the three monthsperiod ended March 31, 2009.2010.

Accounting for Derivative Instruments

In connection with the issuance of certain convertible notes payable (see Note 3)5), the notes provided forhad conversion features that the Company determined were embedded derivative instruments. The Company issued warrants in connection with a conversion into shares ofloan payable (see Note 6) that had an anti-dilution provision which caused the Company's common stock at a rate which was determinedwarrants to be variable. The Company determined that the variable conversion feature was an embeddeda derivative instrument pursuant to SFAS No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities," as amended.instrument.  The accounting treatment of derivative financial instruments requires that the Company record the derivatives and related warrants at their fair values as of the inception date of the note and warrant agreements and at fair value as of each subsequent balance sheet date. In addition, under

For all of the provisions of Emerging Issues Task Force ("EITF") Issue No. 00-19, "Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments Indexed to, and Potentially Settled in, a Company's Own Stock," as a result of entering into the debenture agreements, the Company was required to classify all other non-employee options and warrants as derivative liabilities and record them at their fair values at each balance sheet date. Anyinstruments, any change in fair value wasis recorded as non-operating, non-cash income or expense at each balance sheet date. If the fair value of the derivatives was higher at the subsequent balance sheet date, the Company recorded a non-operating, non-cash charge. If the fair value of the derivatives was lower at the subsequent balance sheet date, the Company recorded non-operating, non-cash income.

As discussed in Note 5, effective December 31, 2009, CAMOFI and CAMHZN removed the variability of the conversion feature of their notes, fixing the conversion price at the then conversion price of $0.04 per share.  In addition, CAMOFI and CAMHZN also removed the variability of the exercise price of their outstanding warrants.  As a result, the fair values of the variable conversion feature ($11,190,904) of the notes and the related warrants ($747,381) were reclassified to additional paid-in capital on December 31, 2009.

As discussed in Note 6, effective January 31, 2010, the variability feature of the exercise price of the outstanding warrants issued to Micro Pipe were removed.  As a result, the fair value of the warrants of $59,631 was reclassified to additional paid-in capital on January 31, 2010.

During the three monthsperiods ended March 31, 20092010 and 2008,2009, the Company recognized other expense of $1,800,978 (restated)$11,253 and other income of $1,300,762 (restated),$1,800,978, respectively, related to recording the derivative liabilityliabilities at fair value.  At March 31, 20092010 and December 31, 2008,2009, the derivative liability balance was $4,306,028 (restated)$0 and $2,025,298,$48,378, respectively.

 
F-10


Warrant-related and conversion-related derivatives were valued using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model with the following assumptions during the three monthsperiod ended March 31, 2009 and 2008:2010: dividend yield of 0%; volatility ranging from 178% to 670%(2009)of 204% and 160% to 187% (2008), respectively; anda risk free interest rates ranging from 0.19% to 2.54% (2009) and 0.10% to 2.21% (2008)rate of 2.34%.

The following table summarizes the activity related to the derivative liability during the three monthsperiod ended March 31, 2009:2010:
 
Derivative liability - December 31, 2008 $2,025,298 
     
Derivative liability added during the year  479,752 
     
Increase in fair value of derivative liability  1,800,978 
     
Total derivative liability - March 31, 2009 $4,306,028 
Derivative liability – December 31, 2009 $48,378 
Derivative liability reduced for reclassification of warrants to equity        (59,631 )
Change in fair value of derivative liability  11,253 
Total derivative liability – March 31, 2010 $- 

 
Accounting for Debt Issued with Detachable Stock Purchase Warrants and Beneficial Conversion Features
F-11

The Company accounts for debt issued with stock purchase warrants by allocating the proceeds of the debt between the debt and the detachable warrants based on the relative fair values of the debt security without the warrants and the warrants themselves, if the warrants are equity instruments. The relative fair value of the warrants are recorded as a debt discount and amortized to expense over the life of the related debt using the effective interest method which approximates the straight-line amortization method. At each balance sheet date, the Company makes a determination if these warrant instruments should be classified as liabilities or equity, and reclassify them if the circumstances dictate.  

In certain instances, the Company enters into convertible notes that provide for an effective or actual rate of conversion that is below market value, and the embedded conversion feature does not qualify for derivative treatment (a “BCF”).  In these instances, we account for the value of the BCF as a debt discount, which is then amortized to expense over the life of the related debt using the effective interest method which approximates the straight-line amortization method (see Note 5).

Subsequent Events

The Company has evaluated subsequent events through the filing date of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, and determined that no subsequent events have occurred that would require recognition in the condensed consolidated financial statements or disclosure in the notes thereto other than as disclosed in the accompanying notes.

Significant Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2009,January 2010, the FASB issued SFAS No. 168, The FASBFinancial Accounting Standards Codification™Board (“FASB”) issued an update to its accounting guidance regarding fair value measurement and disclosure. The guidance affects the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles – a Replacement of FASB Statement No. 162 ("SFAS No. 168").  The Codification will become the source of authoritative U.S. GAAP.  The statementdisclosures made about recurring and non-recurring fair value measurements. This guidance is effective for financial statements issuedannual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for interimthe disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances and annual periods endingsettlements in the roll forward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. Those disclosures are effective for fiscal years beginning after SeptemberDecember 15, 2009.2010. Early adoption is permitted. The Company expects to adoptis currently evaluating the impact that this standard with the filing ofguidance will have on its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 and does not expect the standard to have a material impact on the Company’scondensed consolidated financial statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 157-4, Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly (“FSP FAS 157-4”), which provides additional guidance for estimating fair value in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, (“SFAS 157”).  FSP FAS 157-4 states that a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability when compared with normal market activity is an indication that transactions or quoted prices may not be determinative of fair value because there may be increased instances of transactions that are not orderly in such market conditions.  The adoption of FSP FAS 157-4 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or liquidity.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1, Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments (“FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1”), which requires disclosures about the fair value of the Company’s financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate that value, whether recognized or not recognized in the balance sheets, in the interim reporting periods as well as in the annual reporting periods. In addition, FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 requires disclosures of the methods and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value of those financial instruments.  FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 became effective for the Company in its second quarter of fiscal 2009.  The adoption of FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or liquidity.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2, Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments (“FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2”), which establishes a new method of recognizing and reporting other-than-temporary impairments of debt securities and requires additional disclosures related to debt and equity securities.  FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2 does not change existing recognition and measurement guidance related to other-than-temporary impairments of equity securities. FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2 became effective for the Company in its second quarter of fiscal 2009.  The adoption of FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or liquidity.

Other recent accounting pronouncements issued by the FASB (including its Emerging Issues Task Force), the EITF)AICPA, and the American Institute of Certified Public AccountantsSEC did not or are not believed by management to have a material impact on the Company’s present or future consolidated financial statements.

 
F-12F-11

 

2. CONTRACTS IN PROGRESS

Contracts in progress which include completed contracts not completely billed approximate the following as of March 31, 20092010 and December 31, 2008:2009:

 (Unaudited)   
 
(Restated)
March 31, 2009
 
December 31, 2008
  March 31, 2010 December 31, 2009 
          
Cumulative costs to date $2,029,000 $6,756,000  $573,000 $3,166,000 
Cumulative gross profit to date  1,547,000  5,768,000   279,000  2,611,000 
          
Cumulative revenue earned 3,576,000 12,524,000  852,000 5,777,000 
Less progress billings to date  (4,081,000)  (13,495,000)  (995,000)  (5,921,000)
          
Net over billings $(505,000) $(971,000) $(143,000) $(144,000)

The following approximate amounts are included in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets under these captions:

 (Unaudited)   
 
(Restated)
March 31, 2009
 December 31, 2008  March 31, 2010 December 31, 2009 
          
Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts $102,000 $417,000  $15,000 $6,000 
          
Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts  (607,000)  (1,388,000)  (158,000)  (150,000)
          
Net over billings $(505,000) $(971,000) $(143,000) $(144,000)
3. ACQUISITION OF PRECISION AEROSTRUCTURES, INC.

On October 9, 2009, the Company entered into a Share Exchange Agreement (the “Share Exchange Agreement”) with PAI and Michael Cabral (“Cabral”) pursuant to which Cabral, as the sole shareholder of PAI, agreed to transfer to the Company, and the Company agreed to acquire from Cabral, all of the capital stock of PAI (the “PAI Shares”) in exchange for 5,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock (the “NCCI shares”) with an acquisition-date fair value of $900,000 and the delivery of a promissory note of the Company (the “Note”) in the principal amount of $500,000 payable from the proceeds of any equity financing with gross proceeds of at least $2,000,000 provided that the investors in such financing permit the proceeds thereof  to be used for such purpose (see Note 8).

Additionally, at such time (the “Vesting Date”) as the cumulative net income of PAI is at least $3,000,000 for the period commencing on January 1, 2010 and ending on October 9, 2012 the Company will issue to Cabral warrants (“Warrants”) to purchase 3,000,000 shares of Company common stock.  The Warrants will be for a term of the earlier of three years from the Vesting Date or January 1, 2014, and shall have an exercise price of $0.10 per share.  The Warrant vests immediately on the Vesting Date and the estimated acquisition-date fair value of the Warrants was $540,000 (based on the Black-Scholes option pricing model).

The Company acquired PAI to position itself for growth in the aerospace business, which is projected to grow at a 5% compounded annual rate for the next 20 years.  PAI complements the Company’s machining capabilities in an industry that shows more growth in comparison to machine tooling.

The terms of the purchase were the result of arms-length negotiations.  There is no material relationship between the Company, on the one hand, and PAI or Cabral, on the other hand. 

F-12


The pro forma combined historical results, as if PAI had been acquired as of January 1, 2009, are estimated as follows (unaudited):

       
Three Months
Ended
 
      March 31, 2009 
Net revenues     $1,188,097 
Net loss   $(2,981,071)
Weighted average common share outstanding:        
Basic and diluted      20,344,654 
Loss per share:        
Basic and diluted   $(0.15)
The pro forma information has been prepared for comparative purposes only and does not purport to be indicative of what would have occurred had the acquisition actually been made at such date, nor is it necessarily indicative of future operating results.

4.  GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Goodwill represents the excess of acquisition cost over the net assets acquired in a business combination and is not amortized.  The Company allocates its goodwill to its various reporting units, determines the carrying value of those businesses, and estimates the fair value of the reporting units so that a two-step goodwill impairment test can be performed.  In the first step of the goodwill impairment test, the fair value of each reporting unit is compared to its carrying value.  Management reviews, on an annual basis, the carrying value of goodwill in order to determine whether impairment has occurred.  Impairment is based on several factors including the Company's projection of future undiscounted operating cash flows. If an impairment of the carrying value were to be indicated by this review, the Company would perform the second step of the goodwill impairment test in order to determine the amount of goodwill impairment, if any.
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the period ended March 31, 2010 are as follows:
Balance, December 31, 2009 $2,359,121 
Addition of goodwill for adjustment to net liabilities assumed in acquisition  42,221 
Balance, March 31, 2010 $2,401,342 
The Company recorded a purchase price adjustment to goodwill of $42,221 related to the balance of capital lease obligations assumed upon acquisition.

Identifiable intangibles acquired in connection with business acquisitions are recorded at their respective fair values.  Deferred income taxes have been recorded to the extent of differences between the fair value and the tax basis of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. 
Other intangible assets consist of the following as of March 31, 2010: 
   
Estimated
Useful Life (Years)
 
Gross Carrying
Amount
  
Accumulated
Amortization
  
Net Carrying
Amount
 
Customer relationships Seven $1,500,000  $(107,143) $1,392,857 
Amortization of other intangible assets was $53,572 and $0 for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009.  During the three months ended March 31, 2010, the Company did not acquire or dispose of any intangible assets.
 Other intangible assets consist of the following as of December 31, 2009: 

 
F-13

 

  
Estimated
Useful Life (Years)
 
Gross Carrying
Amount
  
Accumulated
Amortization
  
Net Carrying
Amount
 
Customer relationships Seven $1,500,000  $(53,571) $1,446,429 

3.5. CONVERTIBLE DEBTNOTES PAYABLE

CAMOFI AND CAMHZN 12% AND 15% Senior Secured Convertible Debt

The Company’sCompany entered into various convertible debt financing,financings with CAMOFI Master LDC (“CAMOFI”) and CAMHZN Master LDC (“CAMZHN”) prior to January 1, 2009 under the Amended 12% CAMOFI Convertible Note (“Amended 12% CAMOFI Note”)Note) and 15% CAMHZN Convertible Note (“15% CAMHZN Note”) (together,(collectively, the “Convertible Notes”“Notes”),.  As of December 31, 2008, the amounts due under the Notes to CAMOFI and CAMHZN were $2,834,281 and $750,000, respectively.  In connection with the Notes, the Company issued warrants and stock to CAMOFI and warrants to CAMHZN.  The debt discounts as of December 31, 2008 related to the Notes, which includes amounts for the conversion options, warrants and stock, to CAMOFI and CAMHZN were $2,089,443 and $350,090, respectively.  The debt discounts as of December 31, 2009 related to the amounts borrowed prior to 2009 from CAMOFI and CAMHZN were $753,619 and $127,128, respectively.  The debt discounts as of March 31, 2010 related to the amounts borrowed prior to 2009 from CAMOFI and CAMHZN were $416,390 and $71,202, respectively.

In addition, the conversion option of the Notes and the warrants issued to CAMOFI and CAMHZN contained an anti-dilution feature, which caused these instruments to be accounted for as derivative liabilities.  The derivative liabilities were accounted for at their fair values on a quarterly basis and the resulting changes in the fair value were recorded as a gain or loss in the condensed consolidated statements of operations.  As discussed in Note 1, CAMOFI and CAMHZN cancelled the anti-dilution provisions of the conversion option of the Notes and the warrants effective December 31, 2009.

2009

During 2009, the Company borrowed $1,199,600 from CAMOFI and $298,400 from CAMHZN under the Notes.  The debt discounts, which includes amounts for the conversion options, as of December 31, 2009 related to the 2009 borrowings from CAMOFI and CAMHZN were $375,535 and $93,882, respectively.  The debt discounts as of March 31, 2010 related to the 2009 borrowings from CAMOFI and CAMHZN were $206,024 and $51,504, respectively. In connection with extending the maturity date of the Notes in August 2009, the Company issued 800,000 and 200,000 warrants to CAMOFI and CAMHZN, respectively.  The fair value of the warrants on the date of issuance was $80,000 and was recorded as interest expense.

In addition, the conversion option of the Notes and the warrants issued to CAMOFI and CAMHZN during 2009 contained an anti-dilution feature, which caused these instruments to be accounted for as derivative liabilities.  The derivative liabilities were accounted for at their fair values on a quarterly basis and the resulting changes in the fair value were recorded as a gain or loss in the condensed consolidated statements of operations.  As discussed in Note 1, CAMOFI and CAMHZN cancelled the anti-dilution provisions of the conversion option of the Notes and the warrants effective December 31, 2009.

2010

During 2010, the Company borrowed $324,000 from CAMOFI and $81,000 from CAMHZN under the Notes and recorded debt discounts related to the conversion options and warrants issued for the same amounts as borrowed.  The Company received proceeds of $350,000, net of amounts paid directly to a vendor by the note holder.   The Notes are in default.due on August 1, 2010 and bear interest at 15% per annum.  The debt discounts as of March 31, 2010 related to the 2010 borrowings from CAMOFI and CAMHZN were $249,333 and $62,333, respectively.

F-14


In January 2010, the Company issued 640,000 shares of common stock to CAMOFI and CAMHZN for conversion of $20,480 and $5,120, respectively, of principal on the Notes (See Note 7).
The Company has incurred events of default on the Notes.  The last monthly contractual payment on the CAMOFI note was made in October 2008 and no payments have made on the CAMHZN Note which were scheduled to begin on September 1, 2008.  As a result, these are events of default under the terms of the agreement. Under the terms of the agreement, if any event of default occurs, the full principal amount of the note, together with interest and other amounts owing in respect thereof, to the date of acceleration shall become, at the note holder’s election, immediately due and payable in cash. The Convertible Notes aggregatenote holders have yet to $3,784,271 principal and interest.elect to exercise the default provisions. As of March 31, 20092010 and December 31, 2008,2009, the principal balances accrued interest and the debt discounts are presented in the tableConvertible Notes Table, below.

   
(Restated)
March 31, 2009
  December 31, 2008 
CONV NOTES CAMOFI  CAMHZN  CAMOFI  CAMHZN 
Principal $2,827,281  $750,000  $2,827,281  $750,000 
Discount related to warrants liability  (100,355)  (41,170)  (119,369)  (48,890)
Discount related to convertible option liability  (1,605,749)  (253,643  (1,909,996)  (301,200)
Discount related to stock issued with notes  (50,508)      (60,078)    
Notes presented net of debt discounts $1,070,669  $455,187  $737,838  $399,910 
                 
Accrued Interest $141,364  $65,626  $56,546  $37,500 
  (Unaudited)    
    March 31, 2010    December 31, 2009  
CONV NOTES  CAMOFI    CAMHZN    CAMOFI    CAMHZN  
Principal $4,337,401  $1,124,280  $4,033,881  $1,048,400 
Discount – warrants  (101,951)  (30,830)  (38,814)  (16,160)
Discount – conversion options  (757,568)  (154,209)   (1,068,542)  (204,850) 
Discount – stock issued with notes  (12,228)     (21,798)   
Notes presented net of debt discounts $3,465,654  $939,241  $2,904,727  $827,390 
As of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the Company has recorded $751,859 and $609,496, respectively, in accrued interest on the Notes.

During the three months ended March 31, 20092010 and 2008,2009, the Company amortized debt discounts of approximately $388,000 (restated)$698,000 and $252,000,$508,000, respectively, to interest expense related to the Convertible Notes.

The Convertible Notes and Warrant Agreements include an anti-dilution feature and a buy-in clause which cause the embedded conversion option and the warrants to be treated as derivative liabilities which are valued on a quarterly basis and the resulting change in fair value of the derivative liabilities are recorded as a gain or loss upon valuation in the statement of operations (see Note 2).

In connection with the Amended 12% CAMOFI Note, the Company issued 725,000 five year warrants with an exercise price of $0.10 per share and 725,000 five year warrants with an exercise price of $0.20 per share.  Due to the anti-dilution feature in the warrant agreements, the warrants have a reduced exercise price of $0.07 and adjusted total warrants of 3,214,286 at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008.  As of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the fair value of the warrant derivative liability was determined to be $210,178 (restated) and $151,400 respectively.   Upon valuation, a loss of $58,778 (restated) was recorded for the three months ended March 31, 2009.

In connection with the 15% CAMHZN Note, the Company issued 1,000,000 seven year warrants with an exercise price of $0.07 per share.  As of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the fair value of the warrant derivative liability was determined to be $68,376 (restated) and $50,000 respectively. Upon valuation, a loss of $18,376 (restated) was recorded for the three months ended March 31, 2009.

The Amended 12% CAMOFI and 15% CAMHZN Notes are both convertible into shares of common stock at a conversion price of $0.07 per share (subject to adjustment based on the anti-dilution feature). At March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the aggregate fair value CAMOFI conversion option derivative liabilities was $2,522,820 (restated) and $1,515,634, respectively. Upon valuation, a loss of $1,007,186 (restated) was recorded for the three months ended March 31, 2009. At March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the aggregate fair value of the CAMHZN conversion option derivative liabilities was $669,235 (restated) and $308,264, respectively. Upon valuation, a loss of $360,971 (restated) was recorded for the three months ended March 31, 2009.

F-14


CAMOFI6. LOAN AND CAMHZN Senior Secured Convertible DebtNOTES PAYABLE

On February 18,November 12, 2009, the Company entered into an agreement with CAMOFI Master LDCMicro Pipe Fund I, LLC for the issuancereceipt of a Senior Secured Convertible Note for $701,200,Loan of $150,000 (the “Micro Pipe Loan”).  The loan accrued interest at a rate of 2% per month and matured on August 18, 2009 at 83.42857% of face amount. The Note can be converted at $0.07 per share at any time duringJanuary 5, 2010.  On the termmaturity date, all principal and interest was due in addition to a payment equal to 10% of the convertible note, subject to certain anti-dilution adjustments.principal balance.  The noteloan was not repaid at maturity, is currently in default and is now due on demand.  The loan is secured by a secondary interest in all of the assets of the Company.

On February 18, 2009,In connection with the Micro Pipe Loan, the Company entered into an agreementgranted 500,000 immediately vested five year warrants with CAMHZN Master LDC for the issuance of a Senior Secured Convertible Note for $173,800 matured on August 18, 2009 at 83.42857% of face amount. The Note can be converted at $0.07 per share at any time during the term of the convertible note, subject to certain anti-dilution adjustments.five years and an exercise price of $0.20 (“Micro Pipe Warrants”).

The Notes are convertible into shares of common stock with a conversion price of $0.07, subject to certainMicro Pipe Warrants had an exercise feature that was the same as the anti-dilution adjustments. Per FAS 133 “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities”,provision in the conversion option isCAMOFI Warrants (See Note 5). Consequently, the warrants were also treated as a derivative liability.

The Company recorded at issuance a $384,460 (restated)$108,101 derivative liability for the CAMOFIMicro Pipe warrants.  As discussed in Note and1, the anti-dilution provision of the warrants was cancelled effective January 31, 2010.  As a $95,292 (restated)result of the cancellation of the anti-dilution provision, the fair value of the warrant on such date ($59,631) was reclassified from derivative liability for the CAMHZN Note. The conversion option liability is revalued each quarter. Atto additional paid-in capital.  As of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the fair value was $669,480 (restated) for the CAMOFI Note, and $165,938 for CAMHZN Note.  Upon valuation, a loss of $285,020 (restated) and $70,646 (restated), respectively, was recorded for the CAMOFI and CAMHZN notes for the three months ended March 31, 2009.  

The Company recorded deferred financing costs at issuance of $116,200 on the CAMOFI Note and $28,800 on the CAMHZN Note for the difference between the face amount of the noteswarrant derivative was determined to be $0 and the net proceeds received. In addition, the discounts resulting from the conversion options of $384,460 (restated) on the CAMOFI Note and $95,292 (restated) on the CAMHZN Note are being amortized into interest expense ratably over the life of the Notes.$48,378, respectively.  For the three months ended March 31, 2009,2010, the Company recorded amortization expensea change in fair value of the warrant derivative liability that resulted in a loss of $11,253, which is included in loss on the conversion option and issuance costsvaluation of $96,421 (restated) and $29,050, respectively, on the CAMOFI Note and $23,514 (restated) and $7,200, respectively, on the CAMHZN Note.

The Company paid an additional $30,000 in financing costs in connection with the February 2009 financing, which has been capitalizedderivative liabilities in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements and is beingof operations.

F-15


The initial Micro Pipe Warrants derivative liability of $108,101 represented a discount from the face amount of the note payable. Such discount was amortized to interest expense over the lifeterm of the notes.note. During the three months ended March 31, 2010, the Company amortized the balance of $10,003 to interest expense in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations.

In March 2010, the Company issued 71,429 shares of restricted common stock in lieu of penalties on its loan payable. The common stock was recorded at the estimated fair value of the common stock on the date of the transaction. Approximately $12,000 was expensed to interest at the time of issuance and is included in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations.

As of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the Company had recorded approximately $7,500 to$14,566 and $5,566, respectively, in accrued interest expense.on the Micro Pipe Loan.

4. EQUITY TRANSACTIONSNotes Payable
The notes payable are in default and are classified as current on the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets.
The Company’s notes payable consist of the following at March 31, 2010:
Mercedes-Benz Financial, secured with an auto, entered into in February 2007, bearing interest at 9.5% per annum, payable in principal and interest monthly installments of $1,839, maturing in January 2012, includes accrued interest of $4,814. The Company is in default on the note and the balance is due on demand. $42,138 
GE Money Bank, secured with equipment, entered into in July 2007, bearing interest at 17.9% per annum, payable in monthly principal and interest installments of $1,156, maturing in June 2012, includes accrued interest of $5,807. The Company is in default on the note and the balance is due on demand.  28,054 
Capital One Finance, secured with an auto, entered into in April 2008, bearing interest at 7.9% per annum, payable in monthly principal and interest installments of $530, maturing in March 2013, includes accrued interest of $678. The Company is in default on the note and the balance is due on demand.  16,956 
   87,148 
Less current portion  (87,148)
  $- 

Equity Compensation7. EQUITY TRANSACTIONS 

Common Stock, Warrants and Options

Issuance of Common Stock

In January 2010, the Company issued 150,000 shares of restricted common stock to a consultant in consideration for investor relation services rendered valued at $21,000. The consulting fees were expensed entirely at the time of issuance and are included in consulting and other compensation in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations.

In January 2010, the Company issued 250,000 shares of restricted common stock to a consultant in consideration for finance consulting services rendered valued at $35,000. The consulting fees were expensed entirely at the time of issuance and are included in consulting and other compensation in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations.

F-16


In January 2010, the Company issued 640,000 shares of common stock to CAMOFI and CAMHZN for conversion of $20,480 and $5,120, respectively, of principal on Convertible Notes (See Note 5).

In January 2010, the Company issued 250,000 shares of restricted common stock to the Company’s landlord in lieu of penalties for late payments due. The common stock was recorded at the estimated fair value of the common stock on the date of the transaction. Approximately $45,000 was expensed entirely at the time of issuance and is included in selling, general and administrative expenses in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations.

In February 2010, the Company issued 100,000 shares of restricted common stock to one of the Company’s capital lease lenders in lieu of penalties for late payments due.  The common stock was recorded at the estimated fair value of the common stock on the date of the transaction.  Approximately $19,000 was expensed entirely at the time of issuance and is included in interest expense in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations.

In February 2010, the Company issued 100,000 shares of restricted common stock to a consultant in consideration for investor relation services rendered valued at $15,000. The consulting fees were expensed entirely at the time of issuance and are included in consulting and other compensation in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations.

In March 2010, the Company issued 71,429 shares of restricted common stock in lieu of penalties on its loan payable (See Note 6).
In February 2008, the Company entered into a one year contract with a third party for public relationscorporate consulting and marketing services valued at $30,000. The fee was paid in the form of 150,000 shares of the Company’s common stock and valued based on the stock market price of the shares at the contract date. The value of the common stock on the date of the transaction was recorded as a deferred charge and iswas amortized to operating expense over the life of the agreement. Consulting fees under this contract of approximately $2,000 and $5,000 were amortized to expense duringDuring the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, and March 31, 2008, respectively. As of March 31, 2009 the balance of deferred consulting fees was fully amortized.

In February 2008, the Company entered into a three-month contract with a third party for public relations services valued at $20,000. The fee was paid in the form of 100,000 shares of the Company’s common stock based on the stock market price of the shares at the contract date. The value of the common stock on the date of the transaction was recorded as a deferred charge and is amortized to operating expense over the life of the agreement. Consulting fees under this contract of $20,000$0 and $2,500, respectively, were amortized to expense during the three months ended March 31, 2008consulting and at March 31, 2008 the balance of deferred consulting fees was fully amortized.

F-15


In March 2008, the Company entered into a one-month contract with a third party for public and financial communication services valued at $25,000. The fee was paidother compensation in the formaccompanying condensed consolidated statements of 125,000 shares of the Company’s common stock based on the stock market price of the shares at the contract date. The value of the common stock on the date of the transaction was recorded as a deferred charge and is amortized to operating expense over the life of the agreement. Consulting fees under this contract of $25,000 were amortized to expense during the three months ended March 31, 2008 and at March 31, 2008 the balance of deferred consulting fees was fully amortized.operations.

In June 2007, the Company entered into a three year contract with a third party for internetInternet public investor relations services valued at $210,000. The fee was paid in the form of 300,000 shares of the Company’s common stock and valued based on the stock market price of the shares at the contract date. The value of the common stock on the date of the transaction was recorded as a deferred charge.  $18,000 was amortized to operating expensecharge and during the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, $17,500 and 2008.$18,000, respectively, was amortized to consulting and other compensation in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations.  At March 31, 20092010 and December 31, 2008,2009, the remaining deferred consulting fees approximated $84,000totaled $11,669 and $102,000,$29,169, respectively.

Dividends on Preferred StockSTOCK OPTIONS

Under the terms of the Company's Incentive Stock Option Plan ("ISOP"), options to purchase an aggregate of 5,000,000 shares of common stock may be issued to key employees, as defined. The preferredexercise price of any option may not be less than the fair market value of the shares Series C and preferred shares Series D shares have a mandatory cumulative dividendon the date of $1.25 per share, which is payable on a semi-annual basis in September and December each year to holdersgrant. No options granted may be exercisable more than 10 years after the date of record on November 30 and May 31. The preferred shareholders have certain liquidation preferences and do not have voting rights.grant.

At March 31, 20092010 and December 31, 2008,2009, the Company had 1,700,000 options available for future issuance under their ISOP equity compensation plan.

Under the terms of the Company's non-statutory stock option plan ("NSSO"), options to purchase an aggregate of 1,350,000 shares of common stock may be issued to non-employees for services rendered. These options are non-assignable and non-transferable, are exercisable over a totalfive-year period from the date of 26,680 preferred shares Series Cgrant, and 11,640 preferred shares Series D issued and outstanding. vest on the date of grant.

As of March 31, 20092010 and December 31, 2008,2009, the Company’s accumulated dividends payable is $459,275.

5. EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE

The following is a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share computationsCompany had 650,000 options available for the three months ended March 31, 2008:

  Three months ended March 31, 2008 
        Per Share 
  Income  Shares  Amount 
          
Net income $325,835       
Less: Preferred stock dividends  -       
Basic income available to common shareholders $325,835   14,033,089  $0.02 
             
Add: Preferred dividends  -         
Add: Interest on convertible debt  254,100   -     
Add: Dilutive impact of convertible preferred stock  -   1,026,676     
Add: Dilutive impact of convertible debt  -   23,333,333     
Add: Dilutive impact of options and warrants  -   3,588,614     
             
Diluted income available to common shareholders $579,935   41,981,711  $0.01 

F-16


The computation of diluted earnings per share does not assume conversion or exercise of securities that may have an anti-dilutive effect on earnings per share. Convertible preferredfuture issuance under their non-statutory stock convertible debt, stock options and warrants that have not been included in the diluted income per share computation approximated 61,821,000 for the period ended March 31, 2009.

6. RESTATEMENTS

March 31, 2008

The statement of operations and statement of cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2008 included herein were restated to reflect the effect of changes to the original accounting for the CAMOFI Note issued in February 2006.  The original accounting did not record the separate derivative for the conversion option and the warrants in accordance with FAS 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” and EITF 00-19, “Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments Indexed to, and Potentially Settled In, a Company’s Own Stock”.plans.

The effect of these changes impacted the balance sheet and the statement of operations from February 2006 through December 31, 2008. The balance sheet effect is due to recording the conversion option and warrant liabilities and the effect on the statement of operations is due to the gains and losses from the quarterly fair value adjustments and an increase in interest expense. Accordingly, the statement of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2008 has been restated as summarized below:

Effect of Correction As Previously Reported  Adjustment  As Restated 
Balance Sheet as of March 31, 2008            
     Conversion Option Liability  -   2,737,709   2,737,709 
     Warrant Liability  -   1,713,023   1,713,023 
     Accumulated Deficit  12,207,494   2,445,694   14,653,188 
     Total Stockholders’ Deficit (equity)  1,908,610   4,651,075   6,559,685 
Statement of Operations for the three months ended March 31, 2008            
     Marked-to-Market Gain (Loss)  -   1,300,762   1,300,762 
     Net Income (Loss)  (974,927)  1,300,762   325,835 
     Net Income (Loss) Available to common shareholders  (974,927)  1,300,762   325,835 
     EPS - Basic  (0.07)  0.09   0.02 
     EPS - Diluted  (0.07)  0.08   0.01 

 
F-17

 

There were no options granted, exercised or forfeited during the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009.

WARRANTS

From time to time, the Company issues warrants to employees and to third parties pursuant to various agreements, which are not approved by the stockholders.  

On January 19, 2010, in connection with a 12-month strategic advisory consulting services agreement, the Company issued an immediately vested warrant to purchase 3,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock.  The warrant is for a term of seven years, and  has an exercise price of $0.000001 per share. The estimated fair value of the warrants of $420,000 was capitalized as a deferred charge on the date of grant and will be amortized to operating expense ratably over the term of the consulting agreement.  During the three months ended March 31, 2010, the Company amortized $87,499 which is included in consulting and other compensation in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations.

In connection with the 2010 Notes, the Company issued CAMOFI and CAMHZN warrants to purchase a total of 976,000 and 244,000 shares, respectively, of the Company’s common stock. The warrants were issued on various dates, are immediately vested, have a term of seven years and an exercise price of $0.000001.  The relative fair values of the warrants totaling $132,738 were recorded as a debt discount upon issuance (see Note 5).
 
March 31, 2009

The balance sheet at March 31, 2009 and the statementfollowing represents a summary of operations and statement of cash flowsall warrant activity for the three months ended March 31, 2009 included herein reflect the effect of changes to the original accounting for the CAMOFI and CAMZHN notes issued in February 2009, certain adjustments related to the Company’s contract accounting, a misclassification error and the valuation of the related derivative liabilities at March 31, 2009.  Accordingly, the effect of the restatements on the balance sheet at March 31, 2009 and statement of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2009 has been summarized below:2010:

Effect of Correction As Previously Reported  Adjustment  As Restated 
Balance Sheet as of March 31, 2009         
          
(1) Costs in Excess of Billings  15,551   86,477   102,028 
             
(2) Deferred financing costs  435,986   108,750   544,736 
             
(3) Accounts payable and accrued liabilities  1,625,005   105,834   1,519,171 
             
(4) Billings in Excess of Costs  823,478   (216,417)  607,061 
             
(5) February 2009 Convertible Notes  564,984   49,801   515,183 
             
(6) Derivative Liability  4,885,000   (578,972)  4,306,028 
             
(7)Accumulated Deficit  16,701,824   (1,146,263)  15,555,561 
             
Statement of Operations for the three months ended March 31, 2009            
             
(8) Sales  1,298,458   (243,756)  1,054,702 
             
(9) Cost of sales  1,365,543   (546,650)  818,893 
             
(10) Selling, general and administrative  268,271   (36,250)  232,021 
             
(11) Marked-to-Market Gain (Loss)  (2,738,436)  937,458   (1,800,978)
             
(12) Interest expense  (490,498)  (177,897)  (668,395)
             
(13) Net Loss  (3,821,869)  1,146,263   (2,675,606)
             
Net Loss Available to common shareholders  (3,821,869)  1,146,263   (2,675,606)
             
EPS – Basic  (0.25)  0.08   (0.17)
             
EPS - Diluted  (0.25)  0.08   (0.17)
   Outstanding Warrants 
   
Number of
Shares
  
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
  
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value (1)
 
Outstanding at January 1, 2010   12,497,538  $0.12  $- 
Grants (2)  4,220,000  $0.000001  $- 
Exercise  -  $-  $- 
Cancelled  -  $-  $- 
Outstanding at March 31, 2010 (3)  16,717,538  $0.09  $1,216,000 
Exercisable at March 31, 2010 (3)  13,717,538  $0.09  $1,156,000 
(1)Represents the approximate added value as difference between the exercise price and the closing market price of the Company's common stock at the end of the reporting period (as of March 31, 2010, the market price of the Company's common stock was $0.12).

(2)All of the warrants issued are exercisable at March 31, 2010.   

(3)The warrants outstanding and exercisable at March 31, 2010 have a weighted-average contractual remaining life of 4.54 years and 5.53 years, respectively. The 3,000,000 warrants not exercisable at March 31, 2010 were issued in connection with the acquisition of PAI in 2009.  See Note 3 for a description of the vesting terms of the warrant.
 
F-18

 

(1)Adjustment in order to reconcile the Company’s balance sheet account to the Company’s contract accounting worksheets.
8. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

(2)Represents the reclassification of $145,000 of financing costs in connection with the February 2009 notes, less amortization of $36,250.
At March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the Company had loans to two stockholders approximating $585,000, including accrued interest. These loans were originated in 1999 and no additional amounts have been loaned to the stockholders. The loans accrued interest at 5% and are due on demand. The Company has included the notes receivable from stockholders in stockholders’ deficit as such amounts have not been repaid during 2010 or 2009.  The Company did not accrue any interest for the three months ended March 31, 2010 as it was determined that future interest amounts would be uncollectible.

(3)Adjustment primarily reflects a classification error of $80,000 related to derivative liabilities.
At March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the Company has loans from various employees totaling $82,244 and $39,106, respectively, which are included in notes payable to related parties in the condensed consolidated balance sheet. The loans are non-interest bearing and are due on demand.

(4)Adjustment in order to reconcile the Company’s balance sheet account to the Company’s contract accounting worksheets.
In connection with the acquisition of PAI (see Note 3), the Company issued a promissory note to Cabral in the amount of $500,000. Interest on the note accrues at 5% per annum and all principal and interest is due only on and paid from the proceeds of any equity financing of the Company with gross proceeds of at $2,000,000 provided that the investors in such financing permit the proceeds thereof to be used for such purpose.  During the three months ended March 31, 2010, $6,249 of interest expense was recorded in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations.  At March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the Company has accrued $12,499 and $6,250 in interest, respectively.

(5)Adjustment reflects an increase of $278,486 of debt discount related to the valuation of the conversion options and an increase of $119,935 of amortization of such options, net of reclassification of financing costs of $108,750 noted in (2) above.
During the three months ended March 31, 2010, the Company advanced funds to various employees.  At March 31, 2010, the Company has a loan receivable from employees totaling $63,050.  The loans have been repaid subsequent to quarter-end.

(6)Adjustment reflects an increase of $278,486 related to the valuation of the conversion options of the February 2009 notes and a decrease in the loss on fair value of $937,458 and corrections of $80,000 of misclassifications between the change in fair value and interest expense.
9. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

(7)and (13) The cumulative effect of adjustments (8) through (12).
Service Agreements

(8)and (9) Adjustment in order to reconcile the Company’s P&L accounts to the Company’s contract accounting worksheets.
Periodically, the Company enters into various agreements for services including, but not limited to, public relations, financial consulting and manufacturing consulting. Generally, the agreements are ongoing until such time they are terminated, as defined. Compensation for services is paid either at a fixed monthly rate or based on a percentage, as specified, and may be payable in shares of the Company’s common stock. The Company's policy is that expenses related to these types of agreements are valued at the fair market value of the services or the shares granted, whichever is more realistically determinable. Such expenses are amortized over the period of service.

(10)Adjustment relates to the reclassification of deferred financing costs to interest expense.
Capital Lease

(11)Adjustment primarily relates to an increase of $278,486 in the original valuation of the conversion options in connection with the February 2009 notes, misclassification of derivative liabilities noted in (3) above and an overall decrease in the valuation of all derivatives of $578,972.
During the three months ended March 31, 2010, the Company purchased property and equipment under a capital lease totaling $479,488.  The terms of the lease are monthly principal payments of $25,000 and interest payments of 6% per annum on the remaining principal balance beginning on February 5, 2010.  The payments are due every 30 days for up to 120 days.  At the end of the 120 days, the Company is required to pay the total remaining balance plus accrued interest.  The Company was also required to pay $35,000 upon signing the capital lease agreement.  In addition, the Company issued 100,000 shares to the lender (see Note 7) to settle past penalties and interest.

(12)Adjustment relates to proper classification and recording of interest expense.
Legal

From time to time, the Company may be involved in various claims, lawsuits, and disputes with third parties, actions involving allegations or discrimination or breach of contract actions incidental to the normal operations of the business.

 
F-19

 

Delinquent Income Taxes

At March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the Company has approximately $352,000 accrued related to penalties and interest in connection with delinquent income taxes related to PAI’s Federal and State income tax returns for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006. The Company has included the accrued amounts in accounts payable and accrued liabilities.  The related returns were filed in April 2009.

Delinquent Payroll Taxes

At March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the Company has accrued approximately $1,324,000 and $1,187,000, respectively, for payroll taxes not yet remitted for employee compensation and estimated penalties and interest in connection with payroll taxes incurred but not remitted related to executive compensation. The Company has included the accrued amounts in accounts payable and accrued liabilities in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets and the related expense in salaries and related expenses in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations.

Delinquent Sales Taxes

At March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the Company has accrued approximately $132,000 and $127,000, respectively, for sales taxes not yet remitted and estimated penalties and interest in connection with the sales tax incurred but not yet remitted for the period October 1, 2007 to December 31, 2008 and January 1, 2008 to March 31, 2008.  The Company has included the accrued amounts in accounts payable and accrued liabilities in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets and the related expense in selling, general and administrative expenses in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations.  The Company has yet to file a return for the following quarterly sales tax periods.

Tax Lien

On August 25, 2009, PAI received notice from the IRS of a federal tax lien filing for amounts totaling $30,340. The lien attaches to all property owned by PAI and any property to be acquired in the future.

Indemnities and Guarantees

The Company has made certain indemnities and guarantees, under which it may be required to make payments to a guaranteed or indemnified party, in relation to certain actions or transactions. The Company indemnifies its directors, officers, employees and agents, as permitted under the laws of the State of California. In connection with its facility leases, the Company has indemnified its lessors for certain claims arising from the use of the facilities.  The duration of the guarantees and indemnities varies, and is generally tied to the life of the agreement. These guarantees and indemnities do not provide for any limitation of the maximum potential future payments the Company could be obligated to make. Historically, the Company has not been obligated nor incurred any payments for these obligations and, therefore, no liabilities have been recorded for these indemnities and guarantees in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

10. SEGMENT REPORTING

The Company’s operations are classified into two principal reportable segments that provide different products or services. Separate management of each segment is required because each business unit is subject to different marketing, production, and technology strategies. The Company operates in the following two reportable segments:

(a)CNC machine tool remanufacturing and
(b)Multiaxis structural aircraft components.
F-20


The Company evaluates performance and allocates resources based upon operating income. The accounting policies of the reportable segments are the same as those described in the summary of accounting policies. Inter-segment sales are eliminated upon consolidation.

The following table summarizes segment asset and operating balances by reportable segment, has been prepared in accordance with the internal accounting policies, and may not be presented in accordance with GAAP:

  
Three
Months Ended/
As of
March 31,
2010
  
Three
Months
Ended
March 31,
2009
 
Net revenue from external customers:      
       
CNC machine tool remanufacturing $160,047  $1,054,702 
Multiaxis structural aircraft components  397,643   - 
        Total net revenue from external customers:  557,690   1,054,702 
         
Operating loss:        
         
CNC machine tool remanufacturing  (812,706)  (211,914)
Multiaxis structural aircraft components  (193,354)  - 
         Total operating loss:  (1,006,060)  (211,914)
         
Depreciation and amortization from operations:        
         
CNC machine tool remanufacturing  20,652   14,030 
Multiaxis structural aircraft components  125,496   - 
        Total depreciation and amortization expense:  146,148   14,030 
         
 Interest expense:        
         
CNC machine tool remanufacturing  937,958   668,395 
Multiaxis structural aircraft components  35,248   - 
         Total interest expense:  973,206   668,395 
         
Net loss:        
         
CNC machine tool remanufacturing  (1,757,005)  (2,675,606) 
Multiaxis structural aircraft components  (37,428)   - 
         Total loss from continuing operations:  (1,794,433)  (2,675,606) 
         
Identifiable assets:        
         
CNC machine tool remanufacturing  1,080,829     
Multiaxis structural aircraft components  5,009,899     
         Total identifiable assets:  6,090,728     
F-21


11. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

During the second quarter of 2010, the Company issued 736,000 shares of common stock for cashless exercise of employee options.

On April 5, 2010, the Company granted each of five new non-employee directors non-plan options to purchase 1,000,000 shares of common stock, and a consultant non-plan options to purchase 5,000,000 shares of common stock in consideration for investor relations services, all at an exercise price of $0.13 per share.

F-22


ITEM 2.  MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the Company's condensed consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this Form 10-Q/A.10-Q. Certain statements contained herein that are not related to historical results, including, without limitation, statements regarding the Company's business strategy and objectives, future financial position, expectations about pending litigation and estimated cost savings, are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Securities Exchange Act") and involve risks and uncertainties. Although the Company believes that the assumptions on which these forward-looking statements are based are reasonable, there can be no assurance that such assumptions will prove to be accurate and actual results could differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, regulatory policies, and market and general policies, competition from other similar businesses, and market and general economic factors. All forward-looking statements contained in this Form 10-Q are qualified in their entirety by this statement.

OVERVIEW

U.S. Aerospace is engaged in the production of aircraft assemblies, structural components, and highly engineered, precision machined details for the United States Department of Defense, United States Air Force, Lockheed Martin Corporation, The Boeing Company, L-3 Communications Holdings, Inc., the Middle River Aircraft Systems subsidiary of General Electric Company, and other aircraft manufacturers, aerospace companies, and defense contractors.  The Company supplies structural aircraft parts for military aircraft such as the P-3 Orion, and wide-body commercial airliners such as the Boeing747.
The Company is also a leading manufacturer and remanufacturer of specialized aircraft machining tools, including vertical boring mills and large Vertical Turning Centers (“VTCs”) used to manufacture the largest jet engines, airplane landing gear and other precision components for aerospace and other industries.

Through PAI, we are an emerging world class supplier of complex structural airframe machined components and assemblies for commercial and military aircraft builders in the United States and around the world.  PAI specializes in engineering, and manufacturing of precision computerized numerical control (“CNC”) machined multiaxis structural aircraft components, with tolerances of up to +/-.0001” on ferrous and non-ferrous metals.
PAI’s capabilities include high speed three, four and five axis precision CNC machining of titanium, aluminum, stainless steel, and nickel-chromium-based superalloys.  PAI’s aircraft component products include wing ribs, stringers, spars, longerons, bulkheads, frames, engine mounts, chords, and fittings.  In addition, PAI designs and fabricates tools and fixtures.

New Century manufactures large VTC lathes and attachments under the trade name Century Turn.  New Century is also engaged in acquiring, re-manufacturing and selling pre-owned Computer Numerically Controlled ("CNC")CNC machine tools to manufacturing customers. The CompanyIn addition, New Century provides rebuilt, retrofit and remanufacturing services for numerous brands of machine tools. The remanufacturing of a machine tool, typically consisting of replacing all components, realigning the machine, adding updated CNC capability and electrical and mechanical enhancements, generally takes two to four months to complete. Once completed, a remanufactured machine is a "like new," state-of-the-art machine with a price ranging from $275,000 to $1,000,000 or more, which is substantially less thenapproximately 40%-50% of the price of an equivalenta new machine. The Company also manufactures original equipment CNC large turning lathes and attachments under the trade name Century Turn.

CNC machines use commands from onboard computers to control the movements of cutting tools and rotation speeds of the parts being produced. Computer controls enable operators to program operations such as part rotation, tooling selection and tooling movement for specific parts and then store the programs in memory for future use. The machines are able to produce parts while left unattended. Because of this ability, as well as superior speed of operation, a CNC machine is able to produce the same amount of work as several manually controlled machines, as well as reduce the number of operators required; generating higher profits with less re-work and scrap. Since the introduction of CNC tooling machines, continual advances in computer control technology have allowed for easier programming and additional machine capabilities.

A vertical turning machine permits the production of larger, heavier and more oddly shaped parts on a machine, which uses less floor space when compared to the traditional horizontal turning machine because the spindle and cam are aligned on a vertical plane, with the spindle on the bottom.

The primary industry segments in which the Company’s machines are utilizedCompany continues to make component parts are in aerospace, power generation turbines, military, component partsincur operating losses for the energy sector for natural gas and oil exploration and medical fields. The Company sells its products to customers located in United States, Canada and Mexico.

Over the last four years, the Company has designed and developed a large horizontal CNC turning lathe with productivity features new to the metalworking industry. The Company believes that a potential market for the Century Turn Lathe, in addition to the markets mentioned above, is aircraft landing gear.

We provide our manufactured and remanufactured machines as parteach of the machine tool industry. The machine tool industry worldwide is approximatelyperiods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009. This was a $30 billion business annually. The industry is sensitive to market conditions and generally trends downward prior to poor economic conditions, and improves prior to an improvementresult of a dramatic decrease in economic conditions.

3


Our machines are utilized in a wide variety of industry segments as follows: aerospace, energy, valves, fittings, oil and gas, machinery and equipment, and transportation. With the recent downturn in the aerospace industry, we have seen an increase in orders from new industries such as defense and medical industries.

sales. The Company's current strategy is to expand its customer sales base with its present line of machine products. The Company's growth strategy also includes strategic acquisitions in addition to growing the current business. Plans for expansion are expected to be funded through current working capital from ongoing sales. However, significant growth will require additional funds in the form of debt or equity, or a combination thereof. The Company's growth strategy also includes strategic mergers in addition to growing the current business. A significant acquisition will require additional financing.

4


RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 20092010 COMPARED TO MARCH 31, 2008.2009.

     Net Revenues.  The Company generated net revenues of $557,690 for the three months ended March 31, 2010, which was a $497,012 or 47% decrease from $1,054,702 for the three  months  ended  March 31,  2009, which was a $471,900 or 31% decrease from $1,526,602 for the three months ended March 31, 2008.2009.  The decrease is the result of lower then usual sales due to the recession and a tighter credit market and less availability of funds for companies to make capital equipment purchases.market.

     Gross (Loss) Profit.  Gross (loss) profit for the three months ended March 31, 2009,2010,  was $235,809($134,958) or 22%24% of revenues,  compared to $218,123a gross profit of $235,809 or 14%22% of revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2008,2009, a 8% increase.157% decrease. The increase in gross profitloss is due to management strategycertain continuing fixed overhead expenses applied to lower cost of sales through reduction of overhead expenses and cost of materials.revenues.

Operating Expenses.  The Company incurred total operating expenses of $447,723 for the three months ended March 31, 2009, which was a $315,186 or 41% decrease from $762,909 for the three months ended March 31, 2008. In the three months ended March 31, 2009, compared with the three months ended March 31, 2008, all the operating expenses increased (decreased) as follow:

Increase/(Decrease)
%
Consulting and other compensation(77)
Salaries and related186
Selling, general and administrative(57)

The decrease in consulting and other compensation is due to the reduction in the number of consulting contracts and the expiration of the existing contracts. The increase in salaries and related costs is due to the reclassification of certain costs to compensation. Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased due to management strategy to reduce operating expenses.

     Operating Loss.  Operating loss for the three months ended March 31, 2009,2010, was $211,914$1,006,060 compared to $544,786$211,914 for the three months ended March 31, 2008.2009. The decreaseincrease in loss of $332,872$794,146 is primarily due to a 95% increase in operating expenses and secondarily to 47% decreased cost of sales and decreased selling, general and administrative expensesrevenues for the quarterthree months ended March 31, 2009.2010.

     Interest Expense and Debt Discount Amortization.  Interest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2009,2010, was $668,395$973,206 compared with $486,769$668,395 for the three months ended March 31, 2008.2009. The increase of $181,62646%  in interest expenses is due to additional interest and discount amortization on six new convertible loans.notes for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and eight convertible noted issued after the period ended March 31, 2009 (See Note 5). 

 
4


Change in Fair ValueOperating Expenses. The Company incurred total operating expenses of Derivative Liabilities. $871,102 for the three months ended March 31, 2010, which was a $423,379 or a 95% increase from $447,723 for the three months ended March 31, 2009. In connectionthe three months ended March 31, 2010, compared with its convertible notes, the Company recorded conversion options and warrant derivative liabilities. The derivative liabilities are reevaluated each reporting period. During the three months ended March 31, 2009, we recordedall the operating expenses increased as follow:

Increase
%
Consulting and other compensation217
Salaries and related79
Selling, general and administrative72

The increase in consulting and other compensation is due primarily to $87,499 amortization of 3,000,000 warrants issued to a loss of $1,800,978 onconsultant during the change in fair valuethree months ended March 31, 2010. All operating expenses increased due to additional costs related to the increaseoperations of Precision Aerostructures, Inc which was acquired in our stock price from December 31, 2008.October 2009.

FINANCIAL CONDITION, LIQUIDITY, CAPITAL RESOURCES

The net decrease in cash during the three months ended March 31, 2010 was $150,428. The cash used in operating activities was $403,584. This was due mainly to a net loss of $1,794,433 offset by non-cash expenses of $708,381 related to amortization of debt discount, $147,143 in stock issued for services and $146,148 of depreciation and amortization. Other operating activities that used cash were mainly an increase in accounts receivable of $60,968 and inventories of $16,727.  These were offset by an increase of accounts payable, accrued liabilities and interest of $550,653.

No cash was used in investing activities.  $479,488 of equipment was purchased through a capital lease.

Cash provided by financing activities was $253,156 mainly from the issuance of convertible notes with net proceeds of $350,000 offset by principal payments on notes and capital leases of $141,662.

5


The net increase during the three months ended March 31, 2009 was $236,206. The increase iswas due to $700,000 proceeds from issuance of convertible notes payable in which we received net proceeds of $700,000.

 Forfor the three months ended March 31, 2009 the cash provided by financing activities was $710,169, compared with $6,503 in$350,000 proceeds for the three months ended March 31, 2008. For2010 from the three months ended March 31, 2009, $473,976 cash was used by operating activities.issuance of convertible notes payable.

GOING CONCERNGoing Concern

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates, among other things, the realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. TheAs of and for the three months ended March 31, 2010, the Company hashad a net loss of approximately $1,794,000, an accumulated deficit of approximately $15,556,000, a net loss of approximately $2,677,000, a$28,633,000, working capital deficit of approximately $7,339,000$10,582,000 and was also in default on twoseveral notes payable (see Note 6) and had events of default on its convertible notes.CAMOFI and CAMHZN debt (see Note 5).   These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. The Company intends to fund operations through anticipated increased sales along with renegotiated or new debt and equity financing arrangements which management believes may be insufficient to fund its capital expenditures, working capital and other cash requirements for the year ending December 31, 2009.2010. Therefore, the Company will be required to seek additional funds to finance its long-term operations.operations in the form of debt and equity financing which the Company believes is available to it.  The successful outcome of future activities cannot be determined at this time and there is no assurance that if achieved, the Company will have sufficient funds to execute its intended business plan or generate positive operating results.

In response to these problems, management has taken the following actions:
·The Company continues its aggressive program for selling machines.
·The Company continues to implement plans to further reduce operating costs.
·continued its aggressive program for selling its products;
·The Company is seeking investment capital through the public and private markets.
·The Company is seeking strategic acquisition candidates.
·continued to implement plans to further reduce operating costs; and

·is seeking investment capital through the public and private markets.
The condensed consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments to the carrying amounts related to recoverability and classification of asset carrying amountsassets or the amount and classification of liabilities that might result should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

INFLATION AND CHANGING PRICES

The Company does not foresee any adverse effects on its earnings as a result of inflation or changing prices.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The preparation of financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make judgments, assumptions and estimates that affect the amounts reported in our condensed consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes. The amounts of assets and liabilities reported on our balance sheet and the amounts of revenues and expenses reported for each of our fiscal periods are affected by estimates and assumptions, which are used for, but not limited to, the accounting for revenue recognition, accounts receivable, doubtful accounts and inventories. Actual results could differ from these estimates. The accounting policies stated below are significantly affected by judgments, assumptions and estimates used in the preparation of the financial statements:

5


Revenue Recognition

Service revenues are billed and recognized in the period the services are rendered.

The Company accounts for shipping and handling fees and costs in accordance with EITF 00-10 "Accounting for Shipping and Handling Fees and Costs." Such fees and costs incurred by the Company are recorded to cost of goods sold and are immaterial to the operations of the Company.

In accordance with SFAS 48, "Revenue Recognition when Right of Return Exists," revenue is recorded net of an estimate of markdowns, price concessions and warranty costs. Such reserve is based on management's evaluation of historical experience, current industry trends and estimated costs.
In December 1999, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued Staff Accounting Bulletin 101 ("SAB 101"), "Revenue Recognition," as amended by SAB No. 104 which outlines the basic criteria that must be met to recognize revenue and provides guidance for presentation of revenue and for disclosure related to revenue recognition policies in financial statements filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Management believes that the Company's revenue recognition policy for services and product sales conforms to SAB 101 amended by SAB 104. The Company recognizes revenue of long-term contracts pursuant to SOP 81-1.

Method of Accounting for Long-Term Contracts

The Company uses the percentage-of-completion method of accounting to account for long-term contracts and, therefore, takes into account the cost, estimated earnings and revenue to date on fixed-fee contracts not yet completed. The percentage-of-completion method is used because management considers total cost to be the best available measure of progress on the contracts. Because of inherent uncertainties in estimating costs, it is at least reasonably possible that the estimates used will change within the near term.

The amount of revenue recognized at the statement date is the portion of the total contract price that the cost expended to date bears to the anticipated final cost, based on current estimates of cost to complete. It is not related to the progress billings to customers. Contract costs include all materials, direct labor, machinery, subcontract costs and allocations of indirect overhead.

Because long-term contracts may extend over a period of time, changes in job performance, changes in job conditions and revisions of estimates of cost and earnings during the course of the work are reflected in the accounting period in which the facts that require the revision become known. At the time a loss on a contract becomes known, the entire amount of the estimated ultimate loss is recognized in thecondensed consolidated financial statements.

Contracts that are substantially complete are considered closed See Note 1 for consolidated financial statement purposes. Revenue earned on contracts in progress in excess of billings (under billings) is classified as a current asset. Amounts billed in excess of revenue earned (over billings) are classified as a current liability.  Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or net realizable value. Cost is determined under the first-in, first-out method. Inventories represent cost of work in process on units not yet under contract. Cost includes all direct material and labor, machinery, subcontractors and allocations of indirect overhead.significant accounting policies.

 
6

 

Other Significant Accounting Policies

Other significant accounting policies not involving the same level of measurement uncertainties as those discussed above, are nevertheless important to an understanding of the consolidated financial statements. The policies related to consolidation and loss contingencies require difficult judgments on complex matters that are often subject to multiple sources of authoritative guidance. Certain of these matters are among topics currently under reexamination by accounting standards setters and regulators. Although no specific conclusions reached by these standards setters appear likely to cause a material change in our accounting policies, outcomes cannot be predicted with confidence. Also see Note 1 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, which discusses accounting policies that must be selected by management when there are acceptable alternatives.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Not applicable.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We conducted an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer, who is also our Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. The term “disclosure controls and procedures,” as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”), means controls and other procedures of a company that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the company in the reports it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures also include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the company’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer concluded as of March 31, 20092010 that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective at the reasonable assurance level due to the material weaknesses discussed immediately below.

Material Weaknesses

(1)   We had not effectively implemented comprehensive entity-level internal controls, as evidenced by the following deficiencies:

· We did not establish an independent Audit Committee who are responsible for the oversight of the financial reporting process, nor was an Audit Committee Charter defined.  At the current time we do not have any independent members of the Board who could comprise this committee.

· We did not establish an adequate Whistle Blower program for  the receipt, retention, and treatment of complaints received by the issuer regarding accounting, internal accounting controls, or auditing matters; and the confidential, anonymous submission by employees of the issuer of concerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters to the Audit Committee and Board of Directors.

· We did not have an individual on our Board, nor on the Audit Committee, who meets the “Financial Expert” criteria.

7


· We did not maintain documentation evidencing quarterly or other meetings between the Board, senior financial managers and our outside general counsel.  Such meetings include reviewing and approving quarterly and annual filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission and reviewing on-going activities to determine if there are any potential audit related issues which may warrant involvement and follow-up action by the Board.

· We did not follow a formal fraud assessment process to identify and design adequate internal controls to mitigate those risks not deemed to be acceptable.

· We did not conduct annual performance reviews or evaluations of our management and staff employees.

7


(2)   We did not have a sufficient complement of personnel with appropriate training and experience in GAAP, as evidenced by the following deficiencies:

· We do not have a formally trained Chief Financial Officer who is responsible for the oversight of the accounting function.  Currently the CEO is responsible for this function, but has not had formal accounting or auditing experience.

· The AccountantController is the only individual with technical accounting experience in our company but is limited in the exposure to SEC filings and disclosures.disclosures and is not a full-time employee of the Company.

· We have not consulted with other outside parties with accounting experience to assist us in the SEC filings and disclosures prior to the December 31, 2008 10-K filing during 2009.disclosures. As a result, our independent registered public accounting firm recorded numerous adjusting entries.

(3) We did not adequately segregate the duties of different personnel within our accounting group due to an insufficient complement of staff and inadequate management oversight.

(4)   We did not adequately design internal controls as follows:

 ·The controls identified in the process documentation were not designed effectively and had no evidence of operating effectiveness for testing purposes.

 ·The controls identified in the process documentation did not cover all the risks for the specific processprocess.
 ·The controls identified in the process documentation did not cover all applicable assertions for the significant accounts.

(5)   Due to the material weaknesses identified at our entity level we did not test whether our financial activity level controls or our information technology general controls were operating sufficiently to identify a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, that may result in a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the financial statements would not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.

On April 7, 2010, the Board of Directors took major steps in correcting these deficiencies and created an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee and Governance Committee.
CHANGES IN INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

There have been no significant changes in the Company's internal control over financial reporting during the Company's most recent fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Inherent limitations exist in any system of internal control including the possibility of human error and the potential of overriding controls. Even effective internal controls can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation. The effectiveness of an internal control system may also be affected by changes in conditions.

8


PART II.  OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.     Legal Proceedings

      None.

Item 2.     Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

      None.

Item 3.     Defaults Upon Senior Securities

Starting October 2008,January 5, 2010, the Company has been in default with all monthly payments on the 12% CAMOFI and 15% CAMHZN Convertible Note payable.Micro Pipe Loan. As of March 31, 2009,2010, the Company’s default principal and interest aggregate to $530,000.$164,566.

8


Item 4.     Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

      None.

Item 5.     Other Information

      None.

Item 6.     Exhibits

      Exhibit 31.1 Certification required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(d) and under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley act of 2002

      Exhibit 32.1 Certification required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(d) and under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley act of 2002

 
9

 

SIGNATURES

In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d)Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Companyregistrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereuntohereunto duly authorized.

August 28, 2009NEW CENTURY COMPANIES, INC.U.S. Aerospace, Inc.
   
May 24, 2010By:/s/ David Duquette
 /s/ DAVID DUQUETTE
 Name: David Duquette
 Title: Chairman, President and Director

In accordance with the Exchange Act, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Company and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

August 28, 2009/s/ DAVID DUQUETTE
Name:  David Duquette
 Title: Chairman, President and Director
August 28, 2009/s/ JOSEF CZIKMANTORI
Name: Josef Czikmantori
Title: Secretary and DirectorChief Executive Officer

 
10