UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

FORM 20-F

(Mark One)

 REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR (g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

OR

 ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
  

 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20162018

OR

 TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

OR

 SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
  

 
Date of event requiring this shell company report                                 

 
For the transition period from                               to                               .

Commission File Number: 001-13742

ISRAEL CHEMICALS LTD.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

N/A

(Translation of Registrant’s name into English)

Israel

(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

Millennium Tower, 23 Aranha Street, P.O. Box 20245 Tel Aviv, 61202 Israel

(Address of principal executive offices)


Lilach Geva Harel, Adv.Lisa Haimovitz, Adv.

SVP, Global General Counsel & Company Secretary

Millennium Tower, 23 Aranha St.


Tel-Aviv 61070256120201 Israel

Tel: +972 (3) 6844440

(Name, Telephone, E-mail and/or Facsimile number and Address of Company Contact Person)


Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each className of each exchange on which registered
Ordinary Shares, par value NIS 1.00 per shareThe New York Stock Exchange


Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None

Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act:

None

Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer’s classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report.

The number of outstanding shares as of December 31, 20162018 was:

Title of ClassNumber of Shares Outstanding
Ordinary shares1,300,979,538
1,304,890,778


Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

Yes                      No

If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Yes                      No

Note – Checking the box above will not relieve any registrant required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yesx                      No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes                         No


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large Accelerated Filer                Accelerated Filer                        Non-accelerated Filer  

Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing:

           U.S. GAAP

           International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board

           Other

If “Other” has been checked in response to the previous question, indicate by check mark which financial statement item the Registrant has elected to follow.

Item 17                       Item 18

If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes                      No

 


 

 Annual Report
For the Period Ended

December 31, 2016


TABLE OF CONTENTS

 PART IPage
   
  
  
  
1
1
1
3033
138131
139131
185187
211220
222228
233
235233
249247
260256
   
 PART II 
   
260256
260256
261257
262258
262258
262259
263259
263260
263260
264260
Item16H.265262
262
262
262
   
PART III
Item 17.Financial Statements265
Item 18.Financial Statements265
Item 19.Exhibits265
FS-1



SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Annual Report contains statements that constitute “forward-looking“forward‑looking statements,” many of which can be identified by the use of forward-lookingforward‑looking words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “could,” “expect,” “should,” “plan,” “intend,” “estimate” and “potential,” among others.

Forward-looking

Forward‑looking statements appear in a number of places in this Annual Report and include, but are not limited to, statements regarding our intent, belief or current expectations. Forward-lookingForward‑looking statements are based on our management’s beliefs and assumptions and on information currently available to our management. Such statements are subject to risks and uncertainties, and the actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied in the forward-lookingforward‑looking statements due to various factors, including, but not limited to, those identified in “Item 3.3 - Key Information—D. Risk Factors” in this Annual Report. These risks and uncertainties include factors relating to:

loss

Loss or impairment of business licenses or mining permits or concessions; volatility of supply and demand and the impact of competition; the difference between actual reserves and our reserve estimates; natural disasters; failure to raise the water level in evaporation Pond 5 in the Dead Sea; construction of a new pumping station; disruptions at our seaport shipping facilities or regulatory restrictions affecting our ability to export our products overseas; general market, political or economic conditions in the countries in which we operate; price increases or shortages with respect to our principal raw materials; delays in the completion of major projects by third party contractors and/or termination of engagements with contractors  and/or governmental obligations; constructionthe inflow of a canal betweensignificant amounts of water into the RedDead Sea and Dead Sea;could adversely affect production at our plants; labor disputes, slowdowns and strikes involving our employees; pension and health insurance liabilities; changes to governmental programs or tax benefits, creation of new fiscal or tax related legislation; changes in our evaluations and estimates, which serve as a basis for the recognition and manner of measurement of assets and liabilities; higher tax liabilities; failure to integrate or realize expected benefits from mergers and acquisitions, organizational restructuring and joint ventures; currency rate fluctuations; rising interest rates; government examinations or investigations; disruption of our information technology systems or breaches of our data security; failure to recruit retain and/or maintainrecruit key personnel; inability to realize expected benefits from our cost reduction program according to the expected timetable; inability to access capital markets on favorable terms; cyclicality of our businesses; changes in demand for our fertilizer products due to a decline in agricultural product prices, lack of available credit, weather conditions, government policies or other factors beyond our control; decreases in demand for bromine based productsImposing of antidumping and other industrial products;countervailing duties on imports of magnesium from Israel to U.S.; volatility or crises in the financial markets; cost of compliance with environmental legislative and licensing restrictions; hazards inherent to chemical manufacturing; litigation, arbitration and regulatory proceedings; exposure to third party and product liability claims; Product recalls or other liability claims as a result of food safety and food-borne illness concerns; insufficiency of insurance coverage; closing of transactions, mergers and acquisitions; war or acts of terror;terror and/or political, economic and military instability in Israel and its region; filing of class actions and derivative actions against the Company, its executives and Board members; and other risk factors discussed under ”Item 3.3 - Key Information—D. Risk Factors"

Forward-looking.



Forward‑looking statements speak only as ofat the date they are made, and we do not undertake any obligation to update them in light of new information or future developments or to release publicly any revisions to these statements in order to reflect later events or circumstances or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

INTRODUCTION

This Annual Report contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results may differ significantly from future results as a result of factors such as those set forth in “Item 3.3 - Key Information—D. Risk Factors” and ”Item 5.5 - Operating and Financial Review and Prospects.”

The financial information included in this Annual Report has been prepared in accordance with the international financial reporting standardsInternational Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”), as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”). None of the financial information in this Annual Report has been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

This Annual Report contains translations of certain NIS amounts into U.S. dollars at specified rates solely for your convenience. Unless otherwise indicated, we have translated NIS amounts as at December 31, 2016,2018, into U.S. dollars at an exchange rate of NIS 3.8453.748 to $1.00, and euro amounts into U.S. dollars at an exchange rate of €0.873 to $1.00, the daily representative exchange rate reported by the Bank of Israel for December 31, 2016, and euro amounts into U.S. dollars at an exchange rate of €0.951 to $1.00, the noon buying rate in New York for cable transfers payable in euros as reported by the U.S. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System for December 31, 2016.

2018.

Market data and certain industry data used in this Annual Report were obtained from internal reports and studies, where appropriate, as well as estimates, market research, publicly available information and industry publications, including publications, reports or releases of the International Monetary Fund (“IMF”), the U.S. Census Bureau, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (“FAO”), the International Fertilizers Association (“IFA”), the United States Department of Agriculture (the “USDA”(“USDA”) and, the United States Geological Survey.Survey, the CRU Group ("CRU"), Fertecon, the Fertilizer Association of India (“FAI”) and the Brazilian National Fertilizer Association (“ANDA”). Industry publications generally state that the information they include has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but that the accuracy and completeness of such information is not guaranteed. Similarly, internal reports and studies, estimates and market research, which we believe to be reliable and accurately extracted by us for use in this Annual Report, have not been independently verified. However, we believe such data is accurate. There is only a limited amount of independent data available about certain aspects of our industry, market and competitive position. As a result, certain data and information about our market rankings in certain product areas are based on our good faith estimates, which are derived from our review of internal data and information, information that we obtain from our customers, and other third partythird-party sources. We believe these internal surveys and management estimates are reliable; however, no independent sources have verified such surveys and estimates.



In presenting and discussing our financial position, operating results and cash flows,net income results, the management uses certain non-IFRS financial measures. These non-IFRS financial measures should not be viewed in isolation or as alternatives to the equivalent IFRS measures and should be used in conjunction with the most directly comparable IFRS measures. A discussion of non-IFRS measures included in this Annual Report and a reconciliation of such measures to the most directly comparable IFRS measures are contained in this Annual Report under “Item 3. Key Information—5 – Operating and Financial Review and Prospects— A. Selected Financial Data.”

Operating Results”.

In this Annual Report, unless otherwise indicated or the context otherwise requires, all references to “ICL,” the “Group,” the “Company,” “we,” “our,” “ours,” “us” or similar terms refer to Israel Chemicals Ltd., together with its consolidated subsidiaries. When we refer to

our “parent company” or to “Israel Corporation,” we refer to our controlling shareholder, Israel Corporation.Corporation Ltd. Unless otherwise indicated or the context otherwise requires, references in this Annual Report to “NIS” are to the legal currency of Israel, “U.S. dollars,”dollars”, “$” or “dollars” are to United States dollars, “euro” or “€” are to the Euro, the legal currency of certain countries of the European Union, and “British pound” or “£” are to the legal currency of the United Kingdom. See “Item 4.4 - Information on the Company—A. History and developmentDevelopment of the company.”Company”. We own or have rights to trademarks or trade names that we use in conjunction with the operation of our business. Solely for convenience, trademarks and trade names referred to in this Annual Report may appear without the ® or ™ symbols, but such references are not intended to indicate, in any way, that we will not assert, to the fullest extent of the law, our rights or the rights of the applicable licensor to these trademarks and trade names. In this Annual Report, we also refer to product names, trademarks, and trade names that are the property of other companies. Each of the trademarks and trade names of other companies appearing in this Annual Report belongs to its owners. Our use or display of other companies’ product names, trademarks, or trade names is not intended to and does not imply a relationship with, or endorsement or sponsorship by us of, the product, trademark, or trade name owner, unless we otherwise indicate.



GLOSSARY OF SELECTED TERMS

The following is a glossary of selected terms used in this Annual Report.

BromineA chemical element used as a basis for a wide variety of uses and compounds, and mainly as a component in flame retardants or fire prevention substances. Unless otherwise stated, the term “bromine” refers to elemental bromine.
CFRCost and freight. In a CFR transaction, the prices of goods to the customer includes, in addition to FOB expenses, marine shipping costs and all other costs that arise after the goods leave the seller’s factory gates and up to the destination port.
Cleveland PotashCleveland Potash Ltd., a United Kingdom company included in ICL Potash & Magnesium.
CPIThe Consumer Price Index, as published by the Israeli Central Bureau of Statistics.
Dead Sea Bromine CompanyDead Sea Bromine Company Ltd., included in ICL Industrial Products.Products segment.
Dead Sea MagnesiumEPADead Sea Magnesium Ltd.
EPAU.S.US Environmental Protection Agency.
FAOThe Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, an international food organization.Nations.
FOBFree on board expenses are expenses for overland transportation, loading costs and other costs, up to and including the port of origin. In an FOB transaction, the seller pays the FOB expenses and the buyer pays the other costs from the port of origin onwards.
F&CFertilizers and Chemicals Ltd., included in Innovative Ag Solutions segment.
IberpotashGranularFertilizer having granular particles.
ICL BoulbyA United Kingdom company included in the Potash segment.
ICL Iberia (Iberpotash)Iberpotash S.A., a Spanish company included in ICL Potash & Magnesium.segment.
ICIsrael Corporation Ltd.
ICL Dead Sea (DSW)Dead Sea Works Ltd., included in ICL Potash & Magnesium.segment.
ICL Magnesium (DSM)Dead Sea Magnesium Ltd., included in Potash segment.
ICL Neot HovavSubsidiaries in the Neot Hovav area in the south of Israel, including facilities of Bromine Compounds Ltd. Included in Industrial Products segment.
ICL RotemRotem Amfert Negev Ltd., included in ICL Phospate.Phosphate Solutions segment.
IFAThe International Fertilizers Industry Association, an international association of fertilizers manufacturers.
ILAIsrael Lands Administration.Land Authority
IMFInternational Monetary Fund.
KThe element potassium, one of the three main plant nutrients.
KNO3
Potassium Nitrate, soluble fertilizer containing N&P used as a stand-alone product or as a key component of some water-soluble blends.
KOHPotassium hydroxide 50% liquid.
NThe element nitrogen, one of the three main plant nutrients.
NYSEThe New York Stock Exchange.
PThe element phosphorus, one of the three main plant nutrients, which is also used as a raw material in industry.
PCSPhosphatePotash Corporation
Phosphate rock that contains the element phosphorus. Its concentration is measured in units of Saskatchewan Inc., a Canadian company with the world's largest potash production capacity, which owns 13.56% of our outstanding ordinary shares.P2O5.
PolyhaliteA mineral marketed by ICL under the brand name Polysulphate™, composed of potash, sulphur, calcium, and magnesium. Used in its natural form as a fully soluble and natural fertilizer, which is also used for organic agriculture and as a raw material for production of fertilizers.
PolymerA chemical compound containing a long chain of repeating units linked by a chemical bond and created by polymerization.
PhosphatePhosphate rock that contains the element phosphorus. Its concentration is measured in units of P2O5.
PolyhaliteA mineral whose commercial name is polysulphate, composed of potash, sulfur, calcium, and magnesium, used in its natural form as fertilizer for organic agriculture.
PotashPotassium chloride (KCl), used as a plant’s main source of potassium.
P2O5
Phosphorus pentoxide.
P2S5
Phosphorus pentasulfide.
REACH
Registration, Evaluation, Authorization and Authorization Restriction of Chemicals, a framework within the European Union.
Red MOPNatural or artificially reddish color MOP.
SaltUnless otherwise specified, sodium chloride (NaCl).
Soluble NPKSoluble fertilizer containing the three basic elements for plant development (nitrogen, phosphorus and potash).

SOPPotassium of Sulfate or 0-0-50, used as low chloride potassium source.
StandardFertilizer having small particles.
TamiTami (IMI) Research and Development Institute Ltd., the central research institute of ICL.
TASE

Tel Aviv Stock Exchange, Ltd.

USDA

United States Department of Agriculture.

UreaA white granular or prill solid fertilizer containing 46% nitrogen.
YTH/YPCThe Chinese partner in the Company’s joint venture YPH in China.
4DClean green phosphoric acid, used as a raw material for purification processes.




Item 1 - IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISORS

Not Applicable.

Item 2 - OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE

Not Applicable.

Item 3 KEY INFORMATION


A. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

We have derived the consolidated statements of income statement data for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, 2016, 2015 2014, 2013 and 20122014 and the consolidated balance sheet datastatements of financial position as of December 31, 2018, 2017, 2016, 2015 2014, 2013 and 20122014 from our audited consolidated financial statements which have been prepared in accordance with IFRS, as issued by the IASB for the years ended, as of, December 31, 2018, 2017, 2016, 2015 2014, 2013 and 2012.2014. You should read the consolidated financial data set forth below in conjunction with our consolidated audited financial statements and related notes and the information under “Item 5. 5 - Operating and Financial Review and Prospects”, appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report. Our reporting currency is the U.S. dollar. Our historical results are not necessarily indicative of our results to be expected in any future period.

1


 For the Year Ended December 31,
 20182017201620152014
 US$ millions, except for the share data

 For the Year Ended December 31,
 20162015201420132012
 US$ millions, except for the share data
Sales 5,363 5,405 6,111 6,2726,471
Gross profit 1,660 1,803 2,196 2,4102,711
Operating income (loss) (3) 765 758 1,1011,554
Income (loss) before income taxes (117) 668 632 1,1011,520
Net income (loss) attributable to the shareholders of the Company (122) 509 464 8191,300
Earnings (loss) per share (in cents) :     
Basic earnings (loss) per share (10) 40 37 64102
Diluted earnings (loss) per share (10) 40 37 64102
Weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding:     
Basic (in thousands) 1,273,295 1,271,624 1,270,426 1,270,4141,270,009
Diluted (in thousands) 1,273,295 1,272,256 1,270,458 1,270,4141,270,117
Dividends declared per common share (in dollars) 0.18 0.28 0.67 0.500.80


 As at December 31,
 20162015201420132012
 US$ millions
Statements of Financial Position Data:     
Cash and cash equivalents 87 161 131 188206
Property, plant and equipment 4,309 4,212 3,927 3,6863,097
Total assets 8,552 9,077 8,348 7,9737,345
Short-term credit 588 673 603 718552
Long-term debt and debentures 2,796 2,805 2,303 1,3111,146
Total equity 2,659 3,188 3,000 3,6793,388

Sales 5,556 5,418 5,363 5,405 6,111
Gross profit 1,854 1,672 1,660 1,803 2,196
Operating income (loss) 1,519 629 (3) 765 758
Income (loss) before income taxes 1,364 505 (117) 668 632
Net income (loss) attributable to the shareholders of the Company 1,240 364 (122) 509 464
Earnings (loss) per share (in dollars) :     
Basic earnings (loss) per share 0.97 0.29 (0.10) 0.40 0.37
Diluted earnings (loss) per share 0.97 0.29 (0.10) 0.40 0.37
Weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding:     
Basic (in thousands) 1,277,209 1,276,072 1,273,295 1,271,624 1,270,426
Diluted (in thousands) 1,279,781 1,276,997 1,273,295 1,272,256 1,270,458
Dividends declared per common share (in dollars) 0.18 0.13 0.18 0.28 0.67

 As at December 31,
 20182017201620152014
 US$ millions

Wedisclose in this Annual Report non-IFRS financial measures titled adjusted operating income and adjusted net income attributable to the Company’s shareholders. Our management uses adjusted operating income and adjusted net income attributable to the Company’s shareholders to facilitate operating performance comparisons from period to period. We calculate our adjusted operating income by adjusting our operating income to add certain items, as set forth in the reconciliation table below. Certain of these items may recur. We calculate our adjusted net income attributable to the Company’s shareholders by adjusting our net income attributable to the Company’s shareholders to add certain items, as set forth in the reconciliation table below, excluding the total tax impact of such adjustments and adjustments attributable to the non-controlling interests.

You should not view adjusted operating income or adjusted net income attributable to the Company’s shareholders as a substitute for operating income or net income attributable to the Company’s shareholders determined in accordance with IFRS, and you should note that our definitions of adjusted operating income and adjusted net income attributable to the Company’s shareholders may differ from those used by other companies. However, we believe adjusted operating income and adjusted net income attributable to the Company’s shareholders provide useful information to both management and investors by excluding certain expenses that management believes are not indicative of our ongoing operations. Our management uses these non-IFRS measures to evaluate the Company's business strategies and management's performance. We believe that these non-IFRS measures provide useful information to investors because they improve the comparability of the financial results between periods and provide for greater transparency of key measures used to evaluate our performance.

Statements of Financial Position Data:     
Total assets 8,776 8,714 8,552 9,077 8,348
Total liabilities 4,861 5,784 5,893 5,889 5,348
Total equity 3,915 2,930 2,659 3,188 3,000


The table below reconciles total adjusted operating income and total adjusted net incomeattributable to the shareholders of the Company, to the comparable IFRS measures:

 For the Year Ended December 31,
 20162015201420132012
 US$ millions
Operating income (loss)(3)7657581,1011,554
Impact of employee strike (1)-24817--
Capital loss (gain) (2)1(208)---
Write-down and impairment of assets (3)489907110-
Provision for early retirement and dismissal of employees (4)3948-6055
Income from consolidation of previous equity method investee  (5)-(7)(36)--
Provision in respect of prior periods resulting from an arbitration decision (6)1310149--
VAT refund (7)----(11)
Retroactive electricity charges (8)(16)20---
Provision for legal claims (9)88---
Provision for historical waste removal (10)5120-25-
Other--1--
Total adjustments to operating income (loss)5852292029544
Adjusted operating income5829949601,1961,598
Net income (loss) attributable to the shareholders of the Company(122)5094648191,300
Total adjustments to operating income (loss)5852292029544
Adjustments to finance expenses (11)38-31--
Total tax impact of the above operating income & finance expenses adjustments

(81)(58)(64)(20)(5)
Tax assessment and deferred tax adjustments (12)361962118-
Adjustments attributable to the non-controlling interests(5)----
      
Total adjusted net income - shareholders of the Company4516996951,0121,339

 

     

(1)Loss due to the strike that took place in the Company’s facilities in Israel – in 2014 in ICL Rotem and in 2015 in DSW and ICL Neot Hovav.

(2)Capital loss (gain) from sale of non-core businesses and transaction expenses relating to sale and acquisition of businesses.

(3)Impairment in value and write down of assets. In 2013, with respect to a write down of assets of a subsidiary in the United States. In 2014, with respect to a write down of assets of a subsidiary in the United States, in the amount of $40 million in view of the decline in the selling prices of the Company's products as a result of its competitors' strategy to increase their market share, and in view of the cancellation of the anti-

dumping tax on Japanese chlorine-based biocide manufacturers in the fourth quarter of 2014, and impairment in the value of the activities classified as “held for sale” (following the company's strategy to focus on its core businesses) pursuant to IFRS 5 in Europe, in the amount of $31 million. In 2015, with respect to impairment in value of the activities classified as “held for sale” pursuant to IFRS 5 in Europe and in the United States, in the amount of $47 million and impairment in the value of assets of the Bromine facilities in Israel, in the amount of $43 million in view of the decision of the Company’s management regarding the continued use of various facilities on the Company's sites. In 2016, with respect to the write down of assets (including expected closure cost) relating to the global ERP project (Harmonization Project), in the amount of $282 million, write down of assets relating to discontinuance of the activities of Allana Afar in Ethiopia (including expected closure cost), in the amount of $202 million, and impairment in the value of assets of a subsidiary in the United Kingdom, in the amount of $5 million. See also – Note 13 to accompanying audited financial statements.

(4)Provision for early retirement and dismissal of employees in accordance with the Company’s comprehensive global efficiency plan from 2012 in its production facilities throughout the group. In 2012, with respect to the Company’s facilities in Israel at ICL Rotem and the Bromine companies. In 2013, with respect to the Company’s facilities in Israel at ICL Rotem. In 2015, with respect to the Company’s facilities in Israel at the Bromine companies and the Company’s facilities in the United Kingdom. In 2016, with respect to the Company’s facilities in Israel at the Bromine companies, the Company’s facilities in the United Kingdom and the Company’s facilities of the joint venture in China (reflected also in the non-controlling interests’ adjustment below). See also – Note 18 to accompanying audited financial statements.

(5)Income from consolidation of previous equity method investee (increase in the rate of holdings from an investment accounted for using the equity method of accounting). In 2014, in respect of a company in Brazil and in 2015, in respect of Allana Afar.

(6)Provision in connection with prior periods in respect of royalties’ arbitration in Israel. See also – Note 20 to accompanying audited financial statements.

(7)Refund of Value Added Tax (VAT) payments in a subsidiary in Germany.

(8)Provision in connection with prior periods in respect of costs of management services of the electricity system in DSW and ICL Rotem, pursuant to the Israeli Public Utilities Authority Electricity's resolution form 2015, to impose certain electricity system management services charges also on private electricity producers as opposed to only on private consumers, retroactively from June 2013. See also – Note 20 to accompanying audited financial statements.

(9)Provision for legal claims, mainly regarding two claims settled in 2016 related to prior periods. In 2015, stemming mainly from the settlement agreement that ended the Class Action brought by the farmers in Israel regarding potash prices, and in 2016, stemming mainly from the arbitration award ending the long commercial price dispute with Haifa Chemicals. See also – Note 20 to accompanying audited financial statements.

(10)Provision for removal of waste in respect of prior periods. In 2013 and 2015, in respect of removal of historical waste stemming from bromine production at the Company’s facilities in Israel in light of the government’s requirement to accelerate the waste removal schedule leading to additional cost of implementing a different technology. In 2016, purification and removal of historical waste from the potash activities in Spain as a result of decisions made by the Spanish authorities in connection with the plan for treating the salt pile in the Sallent site leading to plan changes mainly related to the water pumping process involved in the salt treatment. See also – Note 20 to accompanying audited financial statements.

(11)Interest and linkage expenses in connection with the royalties’ arbitration and tax assessments in Israel relating to prior periods. In 2014, in connection with the royalties’ arbitration relating to prior periods. In 2016, in connection with the royalties’ arbitration relating to prior periods, in the amount of $26 million, and relating to a tax assessment in Israel relating to prior periods, in the amount of $12 million. See also – Note 20 to accompanying audited financial statements.

(12)In 2013, mainly relating to a provision for taxes in connection with the Trapped Earnings Law in Israel relating to prior periods. In 2014, relating to a provision for taxes as a result of a change in Spain's supreme court judgment relating to prior periods. In 2015, relating to deferred taxes adjustment of prior periods in the magnesium. In 2016, relating to tax assessment in Israel and Belgium relating to prior periods. See also – Note 17 to accompanying audited financial statements.

B. CAPITALIZATION AND INDEBTEDNESS

Not Applicable.

C. REASONS FOR THE OFFER AND USE OF PROCEEDS

Not Applicable.


2

D. RISK FACTORS


Our business, liquidity, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected if any of the risks described below occur. As a result, the markettrading price of our ordinary sharessecurities could decline, and investors could lose all or part of their investment. This Annual Report also contains forward-lookingforward‑looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Seeuncertainties, see “Special Note Regarding Forward-LookingForward‑Looking Statements.” Our actual results could differ materially and adversely from those anticipated, in these forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors, including the risks facing the Company as described below and elsewhere in thisthe Annual Report (including the factors noted in “Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements”).

Report.

Risks Related to Our Business

Our mining operations are dependent on concessions, licenses and permits granted to us by the respective governments in the countries wherein they are located.

located

Our mining business depends on concessions granted to us by the respective governments in the countries in which we operate. Loss of concessions, as well as material changes to the conditions of these concessions could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We extract potash, and salt in Israel, Spain and the United Kingdom andphosphate, bromine, magnesium and certain other minerals in Israel, potash and also polysulphatesalt in England,Spain, Polysulphate™, salt, and certain other minerals in the United Kingdom and phosphate in China, pursuant to concessions and permits in those countries.

Israel
In Israel, the concession that was granted by the government to utilize the resources of the Dead Sea (mainly potash, bromine and magnesium) ends on March 31, March 2030. In consideration, we pay royalties to the Israeli government.

There is no assurance that the concession will be renewed at that time.

In 2015, the Minister of Finance appointed a team for determination ofto determine the “governmental activities to be conducted towards the end of the concession period”. The public’s comments in this matter were submitted to the team. Based on the interim report and its recommendations published in May 2018, and following a public hearing, on January 21, 2019, the Israeli Ministry of Finance released the final report of the inter-ministry team headed by Mr. Yoel Naveh, former Chief Economist, which includes a series of guidelines and recommendations regarding its positions and viewpoints in connection withthe actions that the government should take towards the end of the concession were submitted to the team. The team was asked to submit its recommendations to the Minister of Finance by May 2016, however to the best of the Company’s knowledge up toperiod. As at the date of the report, since the team had not yet submitted its recommendations. Therereport includes guiding principles and a recommendation to establish sub-teams to implement such principles, the Company is unable to assess, at this stage, the concrete implications, manner in which the recommendations would be implemented in practice and on which schedules. In addition, there is no certainty as to whathow the recommendations of this team will be with regard toGovernment would interpret the procedures that the government will undertake in connection with the existing concessionConcession Law and as to the manner in which future mining rights willthis process and methodology would ultimately be granted.

implemented.

In addition, in 2015, the Minister of Finance appointed a team headed by the (former) Accountant General designated to establishevaluate the manner in which, according to the current concession, the replacement value of DSW’s tangible assets willwould be calculated in the event suchassuming that these assets arewould be returned to the government at the end of the concession period. The determination date of the actual calculation will be executedis only in 2030. As far as the Company is aware, this work has not yet been completed.
3

In December 2018, the Company received an opinion from an independent appraiser regarding the fair value of the property, plant and the remaining useful life of the fixed assets of the subsidiaries Dead Sea Works, Dead Sea Bromine and Dead Sea Magnesium in Israel (hereinafter – the Subsidiaries). The teamOpinion was requested to submit its recommendationsprepared mainly for the Subsidiaries’ financial statements for 2016 and onward, which serve as a basis for the reports filed pursuant to the Minister of Finance by March 2015. In January 2017, the Accountant General sent a letter to the Chief Economist – the Supervisorprovisions of the State’s revenues wherein she noted that recentlyTaxation of Natural Resources Law. There is no resulting change in the positionCompany's consolidated financial statements.
The Property, Plant and Equipment value provided in the opinion is based on the Replacement Cost methodology which is one of the Divisionmethods in international accounting standards (IFRS) for the measurement of the Accountant General in the Ministry of Finance regarding the arrangement coveringfixed assets and is estimated at about $6 billion, as at December 31, 2015, and at December 31, 2016.
Though the assets was finalized (but was not published), however in lightassessed for tax purposes and the expected changeover ofassets that may be valuated under the Accountant General, the draft position report is being transferred to the incoming Accountant General for completion of the work. At this stage,Concession Law are highly correlated, there is no certainty regardingcomplete identity between them. The Company believes that the recommendationsapplied Replacement Cost Methodology used in the opinion for estimating the fair value coincides with the methodology mentioned in the Concession Law for future valuation of the new Accountant General. In addition,Property, Plant and Equipment upon termination of the concession period. Nevertheless, there could be other interpretations to the manner of implementation of the Concession Law’s provisions with respect to the valuation methodology, hence, the estimated value with respect to the Concession Law could materially differ from the value provided in the said opinion, even with respect to the same assets and dates. There is no certainty as to how the Government will interpretmanner of interpretation of the provisions of the Concession Law in this context as will be adopted in a legal proceeding, to the manner in which this process and methodology will ultimately be implemented, and howextent such proceeding would occur. It is expected that the value of the tangibleProperty, Plant and Equipment, at the end of the concession period, will change, even materially, as time passes and as a result of purchase and disposal of assets will be calculated. included in the future valuation.
See “Item 4.4 - Information on the Company —Company— D. Property, PlantsPlant and Equipment—Mineral Extraction and Mining Operations”Operations and “ConcessionsConcessions and Mining Rights”Rights.

In Spain, the government granted ICL Spain, which is engaged in the potash and magnesium business, mining rights based on legislation from 1973. Some of these licenses are valid until 2037 and the rest are valid until 2067. In consideration thereof, ICL pays royalties to the Spanish government. Maintaining the mining activity in Spain requires municipal and environmental licenses which, as of the date of this report, are being examined by Spanish authorities. Insofar as such licenses are not renewed, this is expected to affect, possibly in a substantial manner, mining activity at certain sites in Spain and the Company’s financial results. For additional information respecting issues relating to mining permits in Spain, see “Item 8. Financial Information – Legal Proceedings”.

The mining rights of a subsidiary in the United Kingdom (hereinafter – ICL UK), are based on approximately 114 mining leases and licenses for extracting various minerals, in addition to numerous easements and rights of way from private owners of land under which ICL UK operates, and mining rights in the North Sea granted by the British Crown (Crown Estates). The said mining rights cover a total area of about 374 square kilometers. As at the date of the report, all the lease periods, licenses, easements and rights of way are effective – some of the said periods will continue up to 2020 whereas some will continue up to 2038.

A UK subsidiary from ICL Specialty Fertilizers (hereinafter – Everris UK), has peat mines in the UK (Creca, Nutberry and Douglas Water). Peat is used as a raw material for production of detached beds for soil improvement and use as soil substitutes in growing media.
The Nutberry and Douglas Water mining sites are owned by Everris UK, while the Creca mine is held under a long-term lease. The mining permits are granted by the local authorities and are renewed after examination of the local authorities. The mining permits were granted up to the end of 2024.

Furthermore, we mine phosphate rock from phosphate deposits in the Negev desert in accordance with three concessions from the State of Israel that are valid until the end of 2021. In consideration thereof, we are required to pay royalties to the Israeli government. Our existing phosphate mines in the Negev desert hold limited reserves of phosphate rock designated for phosphoric acid production.

The Company is acting for renewal of said concessions, and is the only entity having the appropriate production facilities; however, there can be no certainty that these concessions will be renewed on the same terms or at all following their expiration in 2021, failure to extend the said concessions could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The Company is working to promote the plan for mining phosphates in Barir field (which is located in the southsouthern part of South Zohar field) in the Negev Desert. In December 2015, the National Planning and Building Council (hereinafter – the National Council) approved the Policy Document regarding Mining and Quarrying of Industrial Minerals, (hereinafter – “the Policy Document”), which includes, among other things,included a recommendation to permit phosphate mining in the Barir field.

The Policy Document that was approved will serve as the basis for preparation of a national outline plan (hereinafter – “the National Outline Plan”) for mining and quarrying, which is also to be submitted for approval by the National Planning and Building Council. Along with the approval of the Policy Document, the National Planning and Building Council instructed the Planning Administration to raise the matter of the directive to prepare a detailed plan for the Barir Field at one of its upcoming meetings.

In the beginning of 2016, the National Outline Plan (NOP 14B), which includes the South Zohar field, was submitted for comments by the various committees, which provided their comments and recommendations toward the end of 2016. On February 14, 2017, a hearing was held by the Committee for Principle Planning Matters, whereat decisions were made with respectdecided to the continuedcontinue advancement of the mining in the South Zohar field. Concurrently, and based on a decision of the National Planning and Building Board,Council, instructions were prepared by the competent authorities with respect to the performance of an environmental survey of the Barir field for purposes of its further advancement. TheIn April 2017, the National Council recommended to the government to approve National Outline Plan (hereinafter – NOP 14B), which includes South Zohar field, and determined that Barir field will be advanced as part of a detailed National Outline Plan, which was approved by the government’s Housing Cabinet in January 2018.

4

In January 2018, the Minister of Health filed an appeal of the said instructions are expectedapproval, requiring compliance with the Ministry of Health’s recommendation to be broughtconduct a survey regarding the health impact in each site included in NOP 14B. As part of a discussion regarding the appeal, which was held in the Housing Cabinet, it was decided, with the consent of the Ministries of Health, Finance and Energy, to remove the appeal and to approve the NOP 14B. In addition, it was decided to establish a team with representatives of the ministries of Treasury, Health, Transportation, Environmental Protection and Energy, which will present to the Housing Cabinet a report that includes health aspects for approvalNOP 14B. In April 2018, the NOP 14B was formally published.
In July 2018, a petition was submitted to the Israeli Supreme Court of Justice by the municipality of Arad against the National Planning and Building Board during 2017.

Council, the Ministry of Health, the Ministry of Environmental Protection and Rotem, to revoke the approval of NOP 14B. In February 2016, the municipality of Arad, together with several other plaintiffs, including, among others,January 2019, residents of the town Arad, andBedouin diaspora in the communities and Bedouin villages surrounding the area, filed"Arad Valley" submitted a petition with the Israeli Supreme Court sitting asto the High Court of Justice (hereinafter – the Court) against approvalthe National Council, the Government of Israel and Rotem, in which the Court was requested to cancel the provisions of NOP 14B and the decision of the Policy Document that authorizedNational Council from December 5, 2017, regarding to the advancement of a detailed plan for phosphate mining in the South Zohar field duefield. In addition, the Court was requested to amongissue an interim injunction preventing the implementation of the NOP 14B instructions and the National Council's said decision until a final resolution. On January 22, 2019, the Supreme Court consolidated the hearing of the petition together with the other things, a fear of potential environmentalpetition filed against NOP 14B and health dangers they contend will occur. Rotem was joined as a respondent todecided that at this stage there is no basis for granting the petition. Ininterim injunction. On February 2017,5, 2019, the Company submitted a statement of defense. The Company estimates that the chances that the petition will be accepted are low. The Company believes that the mining activities in South Zohar do not involve any risks to the environment or to people. filed its response.

There is no certainty that the National Outline Plan and the South Zohar plan will be approved at all or as will be submitted, in light of, among other things, the opposing position of the Health Ministry. Moreover, there is no certainty regarding the timelines for the submission of the Plans, the approval thereof, or of further developments with respect to the South Zohar. If mining approval is not received for South Zohar, there will be a significant impact on the Group’s future mining reserves in the medium and long term. The hearing in the High Court of Justice is scheduled to take place on March 20, 2017.

Our business, financial condition and results of operations may be adversely affected, even materially, in case of failure to receive such approval and to find alternative sources of phosphates in Israel. For additional information on phosphate rock reserves, and concessions and mining activities, see “Item 4.see “item 4 - Information on the Company —Company— D. Property, PlantsPlant and Equipment—Mineral Extraction and Mining Operations” and “ConcessionsOperations, “Concessions and Mining Rights”, respectively.

In October 2015 we completedRights” and “Reserves”.

Spain
A subsidiary in Spain (hereinafter – ICL Iberia) was granted mining rights based on legislation of Spain’s Government from 1973 and the establishmentregulations accompanying this legislation. Further to the legislation, as stated, the Government of the Catalonia region published special mining regulations whereby ICL Iberia received individual licenses for each of the 126 different sites that are relevant to the current and possible future mining activities. Some of the licenses are valid up to 2037 and the rest are effective up to 2067. The concession for the "Reserva Catalana", an additional site wherein mining has not yet been commenced, expired in 2012. The Company is acting in cooperation with the Spanish Government to obtain a renewal of the concession. According to the Spanish authorities, the concession period is valid until a final decision is made regarding the renewal. In consideration thereof, ICL pays royalties to the Spanish government. Maintaining the mining activity in Spain requires municipal and environmental licenses. If such licenses are not renewed, this would be expected to affect, possibly in a substantial manner, the mining activity at certain sites in Spain and the Company’s financial results. For additional information respecting issues relating to mining permits in Spain, see Note 20 to our Audited Financial Statements.
5

United Kingdom
The mining rights of a subsidiary in the United Kingdom (hereinafter – ICL Boulby), are based on approximately 114 mining leases and licenses for extracting various minerals, in addition to numerous easements and rights of way from private owners of land under which ICL Boulby operates, and mining rights under the North Sea granted by the British Crown (Crown Estates), which includes provisions to explore and exploit the resources of the Polysulphate mineral. The said mining rights cover a total area of about 374 square kilometers. As at the date of this report, all the lease periods, licenses, easements and rights of way are effective until 2038.
China
In China, the Company holds a joint venture (“YPH JV”) with Yunnan Phosphate Chemicals Group (“YPC”), China’sa phosphate producer.producer operating in China. YPH JV


has mining rights at the Haikou mine and the Baitacun mine pursuant to holds two phosphate mining licenses that were issued in July 2015, by the Division of Land and Resources of the Yunnan Provincedistrict in China. TheWith reference to the Haikou Mine (hereinafter – Haikou), the mining license is valid untilup to January 2043, andwhereas regarding the Baitacun Mine (hereinafter – Baitacun), the mining license is valid untilexpired in November 2018. YPH JV plansThe mining activities at Haikou are carried out in accordance with the above‑mentioned license. Regarding Baitacun, the Company is examining the option to request a renewal ofrenew the Baitacun concession, priorsubject to its expiration. Nevertheless, in the foreseeable future we do not planphosphate reserves soil survey results and achieving the required understanding with the authorities. With respect to carry out mining operations in the Baitacun mine. In consideration of these mining rights, we are required to paythe Company pays royalties and a resource tax. Seetax to the Chinese government. See “Item 4.4 - Information on the Company—D. Property, PlantsPlant and Equipment—Concessions and Mining Rights”.

In addition, our concession agreements and/or licenses include obligations relating to the expiration of the concession and/or licenses at some of the various activity sites, including reclamation and clearing of the sites (restoring the site to its former state). ItThe scope of restoration required is difficult to estimateuncertain, as is estimating what actions would need to be executed upon expiration of the concession and/or license period, as well asand the costs involved in such actions.

Our ability to operate and/or expand our production and operating facilities worldwide is dependent on our receipt of, and compliance with, permits issued by governmental authorities, including authorities in Israel, Spain, the United Kingdom and China.authorities. A decision by a government authority to deny any of our permit applications may impair ourthe Company’s business and operations.

its operations

Existing permits are subject to challenges with respect to their validity, revocation, modification and non-renewal.non‑renewal, including as a result of environmental events or other unforeseeable occurrences. Any successful challenges with respect to the validity of our permits or the revocation, modification or non-renewalnon‑renewal of our permits could lead to significant costs and materially adversely affect our operations and financial condition. In addition, a failure to comply with the terms of our permits could result in payment of substantial fines and subject us and the Company’s managers to criminal sanctions.

6

It would be noted in this context that relating to the active gypsum Pond 5 in Rotem Amfert plants in Israel, and the process of obtaining a permit for its operation, in January 2018, an appeal was filed by Adam Teva V’Din - Israeli Association for Environmental Protection (hereinafter - ATD) to the District Planning and Building Appeals Committee of the Southern District (hereinafter – the Appeals Committee) against the Local Council and Rotem, in connection with the decision of the Local Committee from December 2017, to dismiss ATD’s objection to approval of the leniency and issuance of a building permit for Pond 5. In light of the Appeals Committee's dismissal of ATD's said claims, in May 2018 ATD filed an administrative petition against the Appeal Committee requesting the Court to order that: (1) the Appeals Committee's ruling is void, as well as any permit issued by virtue thereof; (2) the “relief” in implementation of the outline plan applying to the region, as provided in the Appeals Committee ruling, constitutes a breach of the provisions of the outline plan applying to the region; and (3) the Local Committee shall act to enforce the law and abstain from further planning procedures and permits until such enforcement actions are taken.
On October 11, 2018, the Court approved a settlement agreement between ATD and the Company, the main points of which are: withdrawing the abovementioned petition, in return for a re-deliberation of the Appeals Committee on its decision regarding the implementation of the relief for obtaining building permits for the operation of Pond 5 and future restoration of Ponds 1-4. On October 24, 2018, the Appeals Committee approved the issuing of the building permits for the operation of Pond 5, until the date of December 31, 2020. In November 2018, the building and use permits for Pond 5 were received. The Company is working with the relevant authorities to obtain all the required permits, for the continued operation of the gypsum ponds beyond 2020, and this is in accordance with the requirements set by law and/or instructions of the Planning and Building Committee.
Our operations and sales are subjectexposed to the volatility of marketin the supply and demand, mergers of key producers\customers\suppliers, expansion of production capacity and we face significant competition from some of the world’s largest chemical and mining companies.

companies

In addition to seasonal and cyclical variations, (mainly in our Essential Minerals segment), some of ourthe Company’s businesses are characterized byexposed to fluctuations caused, in part, by factors on the supply side, such as entry into the market of new manufacturers and products, andmergers of key players (producers\suppliers), expansion of the production capacity of existing manufacturers, as well asand changes on the demand side. Some of our products are commodities that are available from multiple sources.side, such as mergers or collaborations between key customers. Our competitors include some of the world’s largest chemical and mining companies. Somecompanies, some of these companieswhich are state-ownedstate‑owned or government-subsidized.government‑subsidized. The potential production capacity is currently greater than the global demand, which has affected price levels. TheIn light of the fact that some of our products are commodities available from several sources, the primary competitive factor with respect to our products is the price. The prices of our products are influenced by the prices prevailing in the market, while recent years sawthe oversupply as compared to demand constitutes a declinenegative factor in the pricesfield of commodities,commodity prices such as potash and phosphates. Prices have remained low due to higher supply and lower demand deriving from several reasons, includingphosphates, as do low prices in the agricultural market.sector. Additional competitive factors include product quality, customer service and technical assistance. If we are unable to compete effectively with these companies, our results of operations would almost certainly be significantly and adversely affected.


Moreover, some of our products are marketed through distributors, mainly as pertains to the activity of the Phosphate Solutions segment and Specialty Fertilizers business.
Inaccuracies7

Any replacement of or modification in the composition of our estimatesdistributors might adversely affect the Company’s competitive ability and cause a decrease in the scope of sales in certain markets, at least in the short term.
Overestimation of mineral reserves and resource depositsreserves could result in lower than expected sales and/or higher than expected costs.

costs and may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We base our estimates of mineral reserves and resource depositsreserves on engineering, economic and geological data that is compiled and analyzed by our engineers and geologists. However, reserves estimates are by nature imprecise and rely to some extent on statistical inferences drawn from available drilling data, which may prove unreliable/inaccurate. There are numerous inherent uncertainties in estimating quantities and qualities of mineral deposits and reserve deposits, as well the quality of the ore, and the costs of mining recoverable reserves and the economic feasibility thereof, including many factors beyond our control. Estimates of economically feasible commercial reserves necessarily rely on a number of factors and assumptions, all of which may vary considerably from the actual results, such as:

·Geological and mining conditions and/or effects of prior mining that may not be fully identified/assessed within the available data or that may differ from those based on experience;

·Assumptions concerning future prices of products, operating costs, mining technology improvements, development costs and reclamation costs; and

·Assumptions concerning future effects of regulation, including the issuance of required permits and taxes imposed by governmental agencies.

If these factors and assumptions change, we may need to revise our mineral reserves and resource reserves estimates. For example, in 2015, we reduced
Any revisions to our reservesprevious reserve estimates for our potash mine in the United Kingdom as a result of depletion due to continuing mining activities, changes in geological interpretation and no new conversion of resources to reserves from ongoing exploration activities.

Because we do not plan to commence mining operations at Baitacun in the foreseeable future, we have not yet completed a study to determine if it has SEC Industry Guide 7 compliant reserves.

For additional information, see “Item 4. Information on the Company—D. Property, Plants and Equipment—Concessions and Mining Rights.”

Any inaccuracyor inaccuracies in our estimates related to our existing mineral reserves and non-reserves mineral depositsresource reserves could result in lower than expected sales and/or higher than expected costs.

costs and may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

In October 2018, the SEC adopted a final rule that will replace SEC Industry Guide 7 with new disclosure requirements that are more closely aligned with current industry and global regulatory practices and standards. We must comply with these new disclosure requirements beginning with our fiscal year ended December 31, 2021, although early voluntary compliance is permitted. As at the date of this report, we have not adopted these new disclosure requirements and have not determined when we will elect to adopt them. When we implement the new methodology in connection with adoption of these disclosure requirements, we will present resource and reserve estimates, and the information presented may differ materially from the reserve estimates to those presented historically and in this Annual Report under the existing SEC rules.
In addition, we do not currently present reserves estimates in Spain (because we continue to evaluate our reserves there) and in the UK (because we don't believe that the polysulphate we are producing there is material).  In the absence of published reserves, we are unable to provide life of mine estimates that determine how long we are able to continue production, and the life of mine may be shorter than you expect.
For additional information, see “Item 4 - Information on the Company— D. Property, Plant and Equipment— Reserves”.

8

The locations of some of our mines and facilities expose us to various natural disasters.

disasters

We are exposed to natural disasters, such as flooding and earthquakes which may cause material damage to our business. In Israel, some of our plants are located on the Jordan Rift Valley, or Syro-African Depression, a seismically active area. Furthermore, in recent years sinkholes and underground cavities have been discovered in the area of the Dead Sea, which could cause harm to the Company’s plants. In addition, an “undermining” process has begun in the northern part of the Arava stream, at the end of which there are located, on both banks, evaporation ponds of the Company’s plants at the Dead Sea, this being a reaction to the recession of the Dead Sea water level. There is a risk that in the long run, this phenomenon willwould jeopardize the stability of the Company’s dikes and evaporation ponds. In the Sodom area, where many of ourthe Company’s plants in Israel are located, there are occasional flash floods in the stream-beds.streambeds. While we have insurance coverage that covers these types of damage, subject to payment of deductibles, the insurance may not be sufficient to cover all of these damages. In addition, we have underground mines in the United Kingdom and Spain.Spain and a mine in China. Water leakages into these mines or other natural disasters might cause disruptions to mining or even loss of the mine. We do not have full property insurance respectingwith respect to all of our property/assets.


The accumulation of salt at the bottom of Pond 5, the central evaporation pond in our solar evaporation pond system used to extract minerals from the Dead Sea, requires the water level of the pond to be constantly raised in order to maintain the production capacity of extracted minerals.

minerals

The minerals from the Dead Sea are extracted by way of solar evaporation, whereby salt precipitates onto the bed of one of the evaporation ponds at Sodom (Pond 5), in one of the sites of Dead Sea Works.Works (hereinafter – DSW). The precipitated salt creates a layer on the Pond bed of approximately 20 million tonstonnes annually. The process of production of the raw material requires that a fixed brine volume is preserved in the Pond. To this end, the watersolutions level of the Pond is raised by approximately 20 centimeters annually.

each year according to the rate at which the pool floor rises.

Failure to correspondingly raise the water level will cause a reduction in our production capacity. However, raising the water level of the pond above a certain level may cause structural damage to the foundations of the hotel structures situated close to the water’s edge and to other infrastructures on the western shoreline of Pond 5.

We are currently working with the Israeli government both with respect to construction of the temporarycoastline defenses and with respect to the permanent solution, which consists of harvesting of the salt in such a manner whereby raising the water level in Pond 5 would no longer be necessary after completion of the harvesting. The temporarycoastline defenses are supposed to provide protection pending the implementation of the permanent solution, which is supposed to provide protection until the end of the current concession period in 2030.

In December 2015 and in 2016, the National Infrastructures Committee and the Israeli Government, respectively, approved National Infrastructures Plan 35A (hereinafter - “the Plan”), was approved by the National Infrastructures Committee,Plan), which includes the statutory infrastructure for establishment of the Salt Harvesting projectProject in the evaporation ponds through, among other things, thePond 5, and construction of a newthe P-9 pumping station in the northern basin of the Dead Sea. In March 2016,As at the Government also approveddate of the Plan.

report, the building permits for the Salt Harvesting Project and the P-9 pumping station have been received and the construction work has commenced.

9

The Company will bear 80% and the Government will bear 20% of the cost of the Salt Harvesting Project, however the Government's share will not exceed NIS 1.4 billion.

For more information about

In October 2017, DSW signed an agreement for the temporary defenses andexecution of the permanent solution, see “Item 4. Information onfirst stage of the Company — D. Property, Plants and Equipment—Mineral Extraction and Mining Operations” and “Concessions and Mining Rights”Salt Harvesting Project, with a contracting company Holland Shallow Seas Dredging Ltd., respectively.

which includes, among others, the construction of a special dredger that is designed to execute the salt harvesting. The dredger is expected to enter into service towards the end of 2019.

There is no assurance that the temporarycoastline defenses or the permanent solution will be fully implemented or that the implementation will prevent damage to the surrounding infrastructure or our operations at Pond 5. Failure to provide solutions, or any damage caused as aforesaid, could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

For more information about the coastline defenses and the permanent solution, see “Item 4 - Information on the Company— D. Property, Plant and Equipment— Mineral Extraction and Mining Operations” and “Concessions and Mining Rights”.
Construction of a new pumping station is required due to the receding water level in the northern basin of the Dead Sea.

Sea

As part of our production process in Israel, we pump water from the Dead Sea through a special pumping station and deliver it to the salt and carnallite ponds. Due to the receding water level in the northern basin of the Dead Sea, the water line is receding from the current pumping station and construction of a new pumping station (hereinafter – the P‑9 Pumping Station) is therefore necessary. We expect that the newP-9 pumping station wouldwill be able to pump water until the end of the current concession period. Construction of the new station depends, primarily, on receipt of


statutory approvals. We have established a designated administration team to advance the necessary procedures

In 2017, DSW signed agreements with several execution and monitor various developments which may affect the receipt of such statutory approvals.

With respect to National Infrastructure 35A, which includes theinfrastructure companies for construction of the newP-9 pumping station, failurestation. The P-9 Pumping Station is expected to commence its operation during the year 2020.

Failure to construct the new pumping station as aforesaid or a significant delay in the planned timetables could have a material adverse effect on time may impair our ability to pump the desired quantityCompany’s business, its financial condition and results of water from the Dead Sea.

operations.

In addition, as the water level of the northern basin of the Dead Sea recedes, we may be pressured to reduce our usage of minerals from the Dead Sea, which could have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Any malfunction in the transportation systems we use to ship our products could have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Approximately half

Part of our sales turnover comprisesis comprised of sales of bulk products characterized by large quantities. Most of this production quantity is shipped through dedicated facilities from two seaports in Israel, one seaport in Spain and oneanother seaport in Spain.United Kingdom. It is not possible to ship large quantities in bulk from other facilities.facilities in Israel. Any significant disruption with regard to the seaport facilities and/or the array of transportation from the seaports, including due to strikes by port workers, or regulatory restrictions and changes in the rights of use of seaport facilities, could delay or prevent exports of our products to our customers, overseas, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

In addition, any significant disruption in the array of transportation to the seaports and between various sites, primarily through trains and trucks, might materially and adversely affect the Company’s operations, its financial condition and results of operations.

10

In addition, the Company transports hazardous materials through the use of specialized transport facilities, such as isotanks for the transportation of bromine. A malfunction in the transportation of hazardous materials in one of our specialized facilities might have an environmental impact and\or cause harm to the welfare of local residents, and, as a result, expose the Company to lawsuits and\or administrative proceedings or fines, and also cause a shutdown of such materials’ transportation systems for a certain period until the cause for such malfunction has been discovered and\or for purposes of preventative maintenance and improvement of the transportation array, and as a result have material adverse effect on the Company’s operations, financial condition and results of operations.
We are exposed to risks associated with our international sales and operations, which could adversely affect our sales to customers in various countries as well as our operations and assets in various countries. Some of these factors may also make it less attractive to distribute cash generated by our operations outside Israel to our shareholders, to use cash generated by our operations in one country to fund our operations or repayments of our indebtedness in another country and to support other corporate purposes or to the distribution of dividends.

dividends

As a multinational company, we sell in many countries where we do not produce. A considerable portion of our production is designated for export. As a result, we are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties relating to international sales and operations, including:

·Difficulties and costs associated with complying with a wide variety of complex laws, treaties and regulations, including the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (the “FCPA”), the UKUK. Bribery Act of 2010 and Section 291A of the Israeli Penal Law;

·Unexpected changes in regulatory environments;

·Increased government ownership and regulation in the countries in which we operate;

·Political and economic instability, including civil unrest, inflation and adverse economic conditions resulting from governmental attempts to reduce inflation, such as imposition of higher interest rates and wage and price controls; and

·The imposition of tariffs, exchange controls, trade barriers, new taxes or tax rates or other restrictions.restrictions, including the current trade dispute between the US and China.

The occurrence of any of the above in the countries in which we operate or elsewhere could jeopardize or limit our ability to transact business there and could adversely affect our revenue and operating results and the value of our assets located outside Israel.

assets.

Some of the above risks might make it economically unattractive to utilize cash generated by our operations in one country to fund our operations or repayments of liabilities in another country, to support other corporate purposes and needs or to distribute dividends.

11

Our operations could be adversely affected by price increases or shortages with respect to water, energy and our principal raw materials, as well as by increases in transportation costs.

costs

We use water, energy and various raw materials as inputs and we could be affected by higher costs or shortages in these materials, as well as by changes in transportation prices.

Our phosphate facilities use large quantities of water purchased from Mekorot, Israel’s national water company, at prices set by the government. If these prices rise significantly, our costs will rise as well. In our plants in Sodom, we obtain water from an independent system that is not part of the national water system. A shortage of water at the water sources in proximity to the plants or the imposition of additional costs/charges for water usage would force our Essential Minerals segmentthe Company to obtain water from sources located further away and/or at a higher cost.

Our plants consume large amounts of energy. Moreover, energy is a significant component of the shipping costs of a considerable share of our products. Significant price increases for energy, or energy shortages, would affect shipping costs, production costs and/or quantities. The production processes and facilities at our magnesium plant require a continuous supply of electricity. While our magnesium plant has two power supply sources — our power station in Sodom and the national power grid in Israel — there is a risk of damage to the power supply from these two sources concurrently. Prolonged damage to regular power supply may damage the plants and the environment.

In 2015,addition, during the Israeli Public Utilities Authority Electricity (hereinafter –the “Electricity Authority") resolved to impose certain electricity system management services charges also on private electricity producers as opposed to only on private consumers, this being retroactively from June 2013. In August 2016,third quarter of 2018, the Electricity Authority published a revision to its decision that gave rise to a reduction of the charges to the Company for the electricity system management services relating to prior periods. Such a decision also expected to affect the costs of electricity generated by theCompany’s new power station.

ICL, DSW and Rotem filed a petition against the decision of the Electricity Authority contending that the decision suffers from significant flaws. On January 23, 2017, the Supreme Court sitting as the High Court of Justice issued a conditional order against the State of Israel with reference to the “retroactive” charges.plant in Sodom became operational. The State was required to submit its response affidavit in connection with the retroactive charges for 2013 and 2014.

In addition, thenew power plant is fueled by natural gas.

The current supply of natural gas to our power plant and to our subsidiaries in Israel is dependent on a single supplier and also on a single gas pipeline with limited transmission capacity.
While our plants are prepared for the use of alternative energy sources (fuel oil and/or diesel fuel), an increase in our energy costs, or energy shortages, could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Furthermore, an increase in price or shortage of raw materials, such as ammonia, sulfur,sulphur, WPA and 4D (which we purchase from a third party)parties) could adversely and materially affect our results of operations financial position, and our business.


We can provide no assurance that we will be able to pass on to our customers increased costs relating to water, energy or other raw materials, such as sulfur,sulphur, ammonia and white acid that are supplied by third parties. Our inability to pass on such cost increases could adversely affect our margins. In addition, shortages in our principal raw materials may disrupt our production capacity and adversely affect our business performance.

12

Completion of certain of ourthe Company’s major projects may be dependent on third-partythird‑party contractors and/or governmental obligations.

Furthermore, termination of engagements with contractors might entail additional costs

In the coming years, the Company plans to complete several key projects, whose completion is very important to the Company’s continued operation and ability to significantly improve its competitive position in some markets. Thus, for example, we are advancing the salt harvest project in Pond 5 in the Dead Sea, the construction of the new pumping station (P-9) in the Dead Sea, the construction of the white acid (WPA) facility in the YPH JV in China, the consolidation of potash mines in Spain including completion of the new mine access tunnel at Suria, and significant environmental investments. The completion of certainkey projects of our major projects maythe Company could also be dependent onupon third-party contractors. ForIn Spain, for example, in 2012,the project incurred several delays and budget expansions that were associated, among others, with the third-party contractor. Situations wherein such contractors encounter financial or operational difficulties or other significant disagreements with the Company entered into agreements regardingcould cause a significant delay in the planned timetables for completion of a project to construct a new cogeneration power station in Sodom, Israel (hereinafter –and\or material deviations from the Station). The Station will have a production capacity of about 330 tons of steam per hour and about 230 megawatt hours, which will supply electricity and steam requirements for the production plants at the Sodom site and for third party costumers. The Company intends to operate the new Station concurrently with the existing power station, which will be operated on a partial basis in a "hot back-up" format, for production of electricity and steam. The total electricity production in the short term will be about 245 megawatt hours. The Company also intends to utilize its present gas contracts and thereafter to enter into new gas contracts in order to run the Station.

Constructionproject’s budget, may even jeopardize completion of the Station was expected to be completed inproject altogether, and could adversely and even materially affect the second half of 2015. In 2015, the executing contractor (the Spanish Company "Abengoa") experienced financial difficulties. In October 2016, the Spanish court approved a debt arrangement between the executing contractor andCompany’s business, its creditors which permitted continuation of its activities in the power station project. In light of that stated, the Company expects to complete the construction and to commence operation of the Station in the first half of 2017, with additional costs that are not material.

Delays in the completion of construction works are expected to continue having an adverse effect on our energy expenses and access to a reliable energy supply at the Sodom site, which may adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

In addition, in September 2016

There is a risk that the outcome of this proceeding, or related proceeding, could amount to a significant monetary expense for us and it may have a material adverse effect on our Boardbusiness, our financial condition and results of Directors has decided to discontinue the Harmonization project for the development and establishmentoperations.
The inflow of a global central ERP system. The Board’s decision derived, among other things, from substantial risks pertaining to the levelsignificant amounts of complexity and readiness of the system, stemming among other things from the nature of services and design as received from third parties in this context.

In addition, some of our projects rely on governmental obligations. For example, in August 2016, the Ethiopian Tax Authority decided to reject the appeal filed by the subsidiary Allana Afar regarding the tax assessment from June 2016, in the amount of $55 million. In light of that stated above and in view of the Ethiopian government’s failure to provide the necessary infrastructures and regulatory framework for the project, in October 2016, the Company’s Board of Directors instructed Management to take all necessary actions towards termination of the project.

The construction of a canal connecting the Red Sea towater into the Dead Sea could adversely affect production at our plants.

plants

The World Bank draftedinflow of significant amounts of water into the Dead Sea could adversely affect production at our plants due to the inflow of significant amounts of water into the Dead Sea might alter the composition of the Dead Sea water, in a detailed report evaluatingmanner that would lower the feasibilityconcentration of sodium chloride (NaCl) in the water, which could adversely affect production at ICL plants. This risk may materialize, among other things, as a result of the construction of a canal connecting the Mediterranean Sea with the Dead Sea, the inflow of water from the Sea of Galilee (Kinneret) to the Dead Sea via the Jordan River, or the construction of a canal from the Red Sea to the Dead Sea in order to address the receding water level of the northern basin of the Dead Sea. Following the aforesaid report, Israel, the Palestinian Authority and Jordan


signed an agreement in principle to implement stage A of the project, involving construction of a pipeline from the Red Sea.

The targets underlying

An examination conducted by the World Bank's report onBank, which is reviewing the construction of the canal are desalination of water for countries inconnecting the region (mainly Jordan), stabilization of the level ofRed Sea and the Dead Sea and contribution to regional peace. Suchindicated that, a canal could change the compositiondischarge of the Dead Sea resulting in a lower concentration of sodium chloride in the water, which could adversely affect production at our plants.

A detailed agreement has been signed by Israel and Jordan, triggering the first stage of the Red Sea-Dead Sea Canal. The project includes construction of a desalination plant in Aqaba and transportation of the desalinated water to Jordan and to Israel. The brine will be pumped into the Dead Sea. Under the agreement, water exchanges will take place, and the Jordanians will be able to receive water from Israel. The facility will initially pump 200 million cubic meters a year from the Red Sea. 80 million cubic meters will be transformed into potable water and the remaining 120 million cubic meters will be pumped into the Dead Sea. About 100 million cubic meters of additional sea water will be extracted and discharged directly into the Dead Sea without desalination. The 180 km long pipeline will be laid in Jordanian territory. Based on the evaluation performed by the World Bank, pumping up to 400 million cubic meters into the Dead Sea will have no adverse environmental effects, as no layering effect will be caused, and the water will evaporate and/or mix with the water of the Dead Sea. For this reason it appears that pumpinginflow on such a scale will also create no significant damage to our plants, especially since only about 200 million cubic meters will be pumped in one pipeline in the first stage of the project (assuming they are not discharged nearby our pumping station), although the actual impacts may be different.

However, if the Red Sea-Dead Sea Canal results in a lower concentration of sodium chloride in the water in the Dead Sea, it could adversely and materially affect production at our plants, our results of operations financial position, and our business.

13

We are exposed to the risk of labor disputes, slowdowns and strikes.

strikes

From time to time we experience labor disputes, slowdowns and strikes. A significant part of our employees are subject to collective labor agreements.agreements, mainly in Israel, China, Germany, United Kingdom, Spain and the Netherlands. Prolonged slowdowns or strikes at any of our plants could disrupt production and cause the non-delivery of products that had already been ordered, and time is needed in order to return to full production capacity at the facilities. Furthermore, due to the mutual dependency between ICL plants, slowdowns or strikes in any ICL plant may affect the production capacity and/or production costs at other ICL plants. Labor disputes, slowdowns or strikes, as well as the renewal of collective labor agreements, may lead to significant costs and loss of profits, which could adversely, and even materially, affect our operating results and our ability to fully implement future operational changes for efficiency purposes. For example, the collective labor agreement in Rotem expired in June 2016. The collective labor agreements in DSW are valid through October 2017, and the collective labor agreements in Bromine Compounds are valid through July 2017. With respect to the Rotem agreement, as of the date of this report, the Company is conducting negotiations with the workers union to form a new labor agreement. During these negotiations, the workers union declared a labor dispute in that respect. In the course of labor disputes, the workers union may impose certain sanctions which may include blocking or delaying the transfer of goods through the factory gates; such disputes may escalate into a strike.

Some of our employees have pension and health insurance arrangements that are our responsibility.

responsibility

Some of our employees in Israel and overseas have pension and health insurance arrangements that are our responsibility. Against some of these liabilities, we have monetary reserves that are invested in financial assets. See Note 18 to our audited financial


statements for information about our employee benefits liabilities and composition of plan assets. Changes in life expectancy, changes in the capital market or changes in other parameters by which undertakings to employees and retirees are calculated, as well as statutory amendments could increase our net liability for these arrangements.

For information about our employee benefits liabilities and composition of plan assets, see Note 18 to our Audited Financial Statements.

The discontinuation, cancellation or expiration of government programs or tax benefits; entry into force of new or amended legislation or regulations with respect to additional and/or increased fiscal liabilities to be imposed on us; or imposition of new taxes or changes to existing tax rates, could all adversely affect our business results.

results

Any of the following may have a material adverse effect on our operating expenses, effective tax rate and overall business results:

·Some government programs may be discontinued, expire or be cancelled;

·The governmentGovernments may initiate new legislation or amend existing legislation in order to impose additional and/or increased fiscal liabilities on our business, such as additional royalties or natural resourcesresource taxes, as has occurred recently in Israel;

·The applicable tax rates may increase;

·We may no longer be able to meet the requirements for continuing to qualify for some programs;

·Such programs and tax benefits may be unavailable at their current levels;

·Upon the expiration of a particular benefit, we may not be eligible to participate in a new program or qualify for a new tax benefit that would offset the loss of the expiring tax benefit.

·Changes in trade agreements between countries, such as in the trade agreements between the United States and China.
14

Changes in our evaluations and estimates, which serve as a basis for the recognition and manner of measurement of assets and liabilities, including provisions for the removal of waste and the reclamation of mines, may adversely affect our business results and financial situation
As part of the preparation and composition of our financial statements, we are required to exercise discretion, make use of evaluations and estimates and make assumptions that affect, among other things, the amounts of assets and liabilities, income and expenses. When formulating such estimates, the Company is required to make assumptions concerning circumstances and events that involve uncertainty, even great uncertainty. We exercise our discretion based on our past experience, various facts, external factors and reasonable assumptions according to the circumstances relevant to each estimate. It should be noted that actual results may differ from such estimates and therefore may adversely affect our financial results. For example, regarding the estimation of the projected costs for the closure and restoration of the Sallent site, as part of the restoration solution, the Company is taking action to utilize the salt for production and sale as a product in the De-icing business. In light of changes in market conditions, mainly in the future selling prices of the said product, the Company updated its provision.
The provision is based on a long‑term forecast, covering a period of more than 50 years, along with observed estimates and, accordingly, the final amount that will be required to restore the Sallent site could change, even significantly, from the amount of the present provision. In the Company’s estimation, the provision in its books reflects the best estimate of the expense required to settle this obligation.
Our tax liabilities may be higher than expected.

Our tax expenses and the resulting effective tax rate reflected in our consolidated financial statements may increase over time as a result of changes in corporate income tax rates and other changes in tax laws in the various countries in which we operate. We are subject to taxes in many jurisdictions, and discretion is required in determination of the provisions for our tax liability. Similarly, we are subject to examination by the tax authorities in many different jurisdictions. As part of these examinations, the relevant tax authorities may disagree with the amount of taxable income reported, deriving from our inter-companyinter‑company agreements and may also dispute our interpretation of the applicable tax legislation. For example, the Law for Taxation of Profits from Natural Resources in December 2013, an assessment was received fromIsrael (hereinafter – the Israeli Tax Authority (“ITA”) wherebyLaw) is a new law that entered into effect with respect to the bromine, phosphate and magnesium minerals in 2016, and with regard to the potash mineral, in 2017. As at the date of the report, no regulations have yet been issued under the Law (except regarding to advanced tax payments regulations published in July 2018), no circulars have been published and no court decisions have been rendered as to the implementation of this Law. The manner of application of the Law, including preparation of the financial statements for each mineral, involves interpretations and assumptions as per a number of significant matters, which require management’s judgment
Based on the law's interpretation, the Company’s position is that the carrying amount of the property, plant and equipment for the purpose of preparation of the Subsidiaries’ financial statements for 2016 and onward, which serve as a basis for the reports filed pursuant to the provisions of the Law,  can be presented on the basis of fair value revaluation, on the date the Law enters into effect. Presenting property, plant and equipment based on fair value revaluation is in accordance with one of the permitted methods in International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), which apply to the Company and its Subsidiaries and are accepted accounting principles in Israel. There is required to payno resulting change in the Company's consolidated financial statements.
15

The tax authority's position could be materially different, even in addition to the amount it already paid in respectvery significant amounts, as a result of different interpretation regarding implementation of the years 2009-2011,Law, including matters other than the measurement of the property, plant and equipment. If the above‑mentioned tax position is rejected by the Israel tax authority, meaning measurement of the property, plant and equipment, for this purpose, should have been in accordance with historical values, the result would be an increase in the company's tax liabilities in an aggregate amount of about $235 million. $100 million for the years 2016-2018.
The Company has appealedestimates that it is more likely than not that its position will be accepted. As at the ITA's assessment. On December 8, 2016,date of the report, the Company withdrewbelieves that the said appeal and agreedtax provision in its financial statements represents the best estimate of the tax payment expected to be incurred with the Taxes Authority to close out the assessment for the above-mentioned years and to also put an endreference to the main disputes in connection withLaw.
Given the open tax years, in considerationmineral's price environment, its effect on the profitability of paymentthe subsidiaries and after deduction of an additional amount, beyonda 14% return on the amounts paid up to now,balance of property, plant and equipment, as stated in the amount of $60 million, including interestlaw, as at December 31, 2018, no natural resources tax liability was payable.
In December 2017, the U.S. tax reform was approved through legislation, and linkage differences.

In addition, in August 2016, the Ethiopianbecame effective on January 1, 2018. The Tax Authority decidedAct is comprehensive and complex and may lead to reject the appeal filed by the subsidiary Allana Afar (hereinafter – “Allana”)future interpretations regarding the tax assessment from June 2016, in the amountmanner of $55 million. Allana contends the tax assessment is illegal and unjustified, and therefore declined to pay it, an action that triggers imposition of sanctions


according to Ethiopian law, including, foreclosure of property and revocation of the mining concession. In light of that stated above and in view of the Ethiopian government’s failure to provide the necessary infrastructures and regulatory framework for the project, in October 2016,its implementation, which may impact the Company’s Board of Directors instructed Management to take all necessary actions towards termination of the project.estimations and conclusions. For further details, see Note 1317 to our Audited Financial Statements.

The company operates in many countries around the world. Under certain conditions, the tax law in certain countries considers passive activities from controlled foreign companies ("CFC") as taxable income even if not distributed. The conditions include, among other, the ratio between active and passive income and tax rates applied in the foreign countries. Although the Company is acting in accordance with the relevant tax legislation, there is a risk that the tax authorities will require additional tax payment, to the extent that the Company's position regarding meeting the conditions of a Controlled Foreign Companies (CFC) will not be accepted
The base erosion and profit shifting (“BEPS”) project undertaken by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (“OECD”) may have adverse consequences to our auditedtax liabilities. The BEPS project contemplates changes to numerous international tax principles, as well as national tax incentives, and these changes, when adopted by individual countries, could adversely affect our provision for income taxes. Countries have only recently begun to translate the BEPS recommendations into specific national tax laws, and it remains difficult to predict the magnitude of the effect of such new rules on our financial statements.

In recent years weresults.

16

We have expanded our business through mergers and acquisitions or organizational restructuring and various initiatives designed to increase production capacity and reduce costs of our existing operations. This could result in a diversion of resources and significant expenses, a disruption of our existing business operations and an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

operations

Negotiation processes with respect to potential acquisitions or joint ventures, as well as the integration of acquired or jointly developed businesses, require management to invest time and resources, in addition to significant financial investments, and we may not be able to realize or benefit from the potential involved in such opportunities. There is no guarantee that businesses that have been or will be acquired or joint ventures will be successfully integrated with our current products and operations, and we may not realize the anticipated benefits of such acquisitions or joint ventures and even incur losses as a result thereof.

Future acquisitions could lead to:

·Substantial cash expenditures;

·Dilution due to issuances of equity securities;

·The incurrence of debt and contingent liabilities, including liabilities for environmental damage caused by acquired businesses before we acquired them;

·A decrease in our profit margins; and

·Impairment of intangible assets and goodwill.goodwill; and

·Increased governmental oversight over the Company’s activity in certain areas.
If future acquisitions disrupt our operations, our business may be materially and adversely affected.

Some of our partners or potential partners in these business initiatives are governments, governmental bodies or publicly owned companies. We may face certain risks in connection with our investments in the joint ventures and/or partnerships including, for example, if our partners' needs, desires or intents change, if the government changes or if the ownership structure of our partners changes.

In addition, we are working onemploying a number of initiatives to improve our existing operations, including initiatives to increase production in Spain and Israel and reduce operating costs at our facilities. In ICL Iberia in Spain we are consolidating all our facilities into a single site which includes a mine and a processing plant, which would reduce costs per ton and allow for the elimination of additional bottlenecks and further expansion. In ICL UKBoulby we are executinghave made a transition from the production of potash to the production of polysulphate (up to a production capacity of approx. 1 million tons in 2020),Polysulphate™ and an expansion ofhave expanded the mining area in order to provide more resources. In YPH JV in China we are expanding the JV’s activities in the field of specialty phosphate solution, among other things through the construction of a white acid (WPA) facility. These initiatives may involve very high costs and/or take longer than we anticipate and may not be realized and\or ultimately achieve their goals. If these


initiatives will not succeed, our financial situation and results of business and operations, as well as competitive position, could be materially and adversely affected.

17

In addition, as part of our plan to create available sources for funding further investments, as well as decrease our current leverage level, we are considering, among other things, various opportunities for divesting of subsidiaries and/or assets having low synergies with our minerals chain and/or portfolio. Accordingly, in 2018 the Company completed the sale of its fire safety, oil additives and Rovita businesses. These divestments, at least in the short-term, cause a decrease in the scope of our business activities and there is no certainty that we will be able to decrease by an identical proportion the fixed costs required in order to manage our business activities, which would adversely the results of our ongoing operations. 
See “Item 4.4 - Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—Our Strategy”.

As a multinational company, our sales may be adversely affected by currency fluctuations and restrictions, as well as by credit risks.

risks

Our global activities expose us to the impact of currency exchange rate fluctuations. Our financial statements are prepared in U.S. dollars. Our sales are made in a variety of currencies, primarily in U.S. dollars and euros. As a result, we are currently subject to significant foreign currency risks and may face greater risks as we enter new markets. We may also be exposed to credit risks in some of these markets. The imposition of price controls and restrictions on the conversion of foreign currencies could also have a material adverse effect on our financial results. Part of our operating costs are incurred in currencies other than U.S. dollars, particularly in euros, NIS,ILS, GBP, BRL and RMB. As a result, fluctuations in exchange rates between the currencies in which such costs are incurred and the U.S. dollar may have a material adverse effect on the results of our operations, the value of the balance sheet items denominatedmeasured in foreign currencies and our financial condition.

We use derivative financial instruments and "hedging" measures to manage some of our net exposure to currency exchange rate fluctuations in the major foreign currencies in which we operate. However, not all of our potential exposure is covered, and somecertain elements of our consolidatedthe Company’s financial statements, such as our operating profit and equity, are not fully protected against foreign currency exposures. Therefore, our exposure to exchange rate fluctuations could have a material adverse effect on our financial results.

See “Item 11.“Item 11 - Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk—Exchange Rate Risk.”

Risk”.

Because some of ourthe Company’s liabilities bear interest at variable rates, we are exposed to the risk of interest rate increases.

increases, including in connection with the end of LIBOR rate calculations in 2021

A portion of our liabilities bear interest at variable rates. Werates and therefore, we are exposed to the risk stemming from an increase in interest rates, which would increase our financing expenses and adversely affect our results. Such increase in interest rates may also occur as a result of downgrade in our rating.
Further, a portion of ICL's loans bear variable interest rates based on the short‑term London interbank offered rate for deposits of US dollars (LIBOR) rate for a period of one to twelve months, plus a margin as defined in each loan agreement. LIBOR tends to fluctuate based on general interest rates, rates set by the Federal Reserve and other central banks, the supply of and demand for credit in the London interbank market and general economic conditions. On July 27, 2017, the Financial Conduct Authority (the authority that regulates LIBOR) announced that it intends to stop compelling banks to submit rates for the calculation of LIBOR after 2021. It is unclear whether new methods of calculating LIBOR will be established such that it continues to exist after 2021. The U.S. Federal Reserve, in conjunction with the Alternative Reference Rates Committee, is considering replacing U.S. dollar LIBOR with a newly created index, calculated with a broad set of short-term repurchase agreements backed by treasury securities. It is not possible to predict the effect of these changes, other reforms or the establishment of alternative reference rates in the US or elsewhere. To the extent these interest rates increase, our interest expense will increase, in which event we may have difficulties making interest payments and funding our other fixed costs, and our available cash flow for general corporate requirements may be adversely affected. See “Item 11.“Item 11 - Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk—Exchange Interest Rate Risk.”

Risk”.

18

We may faceare exposed to material fines, penalties and other sanctions and other adverse consequences arising out of FCPA investigations and related matters.

matters

We are required to comply with the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (the "FCPA"), the UK Bribery Act and similar anti-corruption laws in other jurisdictions around the world, in the countries where we do business.operate. We operate and sell in countries that may be considered to be of high risk in this regard. Compliance with these laws has been subject to increasing focus and activity by regulatory authorities in recent years. Actions by our employees, as well as third party intermediaries acting on our behalf, in violation of such laws, whether carried out in the United States or elsewhere in connection with the conduct of our business could expose us to liability for violations of the FCPA or other anti-corruption laws and accordingly may have a material adverse effect on our reputation and our business, financial condition and results of operations.


Significant disruptions in our information technology systems or breaches of our information security systems could adversely affect our business.

business

Our information technology systems are critical to the operation of our business and essential to our ability to successfully perform day-to-day operations. An intrusion, interruption, destruction or breakdown of our information technology systems and/or infrastructure by authorized or unauthorized persons could adversely affect our business and operations and in some cases even lead to environmental damage. In addition, a significant disruption to our computerized systems could cause harm of damage to the civilian population located in the vicinity of our production facilities. Moreover, we could experience business interruption, information or money theft and/or reputational damage as a result of cyber-attacks, which may compromise our systems, lead to data leakage and to disruption of sensitive production facilities and/or the security thereof, whether internally or at our third partythird-party providers. Our systems have been, and are expected to continue to be, the target of malware and other cyber-attacks. In spite of our investment in measures to reduce these risks, we cannot assureguarantee that these measures will be successful in preventing compromise and/or disruption of our information technology systems and related data. In addition, as we become more dependent on information technologies to conduct our operations, and as the number and sophistication of cyber-attacks increase, the risks associated with cyber security increase. These risks apply both to us, and to third parties on whose systems we rely for the conduct of our business. Cyber threats are persistent and constantly evolving, thereby increasingevolving. Such threats have increased in frequency, scope and potential impact in recent years, which increase the difficulty of detecting and successfully defending against them. As cyber threats continue to evolve, we may be required to incur additional expenses in order to enhance our protective measures or to remediate any information security vulnerability.

Cyber-attacks and other intrusion, interruption, destruction or breakdown of our information technology systems and/or infrastructure also could require significant management attention and resources, negatively impact our reputation among our customers, business partners and the public, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

19

Failure to retain and\or recruit key personnel, or to attract additional executive and managerial talent, could adversely affect our business.

business

Given our increasing size, complexity and the global reach of our business and multiple areas of focus,businesses, each of which could constitute a significant stand-alone company, we greatly rely upon our ability to recruit and retain highly qualified and skilled management and other employees. Much of our competitive advantage is based on the expertise, experience and know-how of our key management personnel. Any loss of service of key members of our organization, or any diminution in our ability to continue to attract high-quality employees may delay or prevent the achievement of major business objectives and may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. For example, on 8 September 2016, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer (CEO), Mr. Stefan Borgas, gave notice of his decision to resign his position as the Company’s CEO and as a member of the Board of Directors. As of the date of the report, Mr. Asher Grinbaum, who up to 1 July 2016 served as the Executive Vice-President and Chief Operating Officer (COO), is serving as the Company’s Acting CEO, pending the appointment of a new permanent CEO. Our Board of Directors appointed a search committee in order to appoint a permanent CEO. There is no certainty regarding the date of appointment of a permanent CEO, the identity of such permanent CEO and the length of Mr. Grinbaum’s service as the Company’s Acting CEO.

We may not be able to improvesucceed in reducing our working capital, reduce capital expenditure and operating expenses towithin the extent and during the timeframe intended by our cost reduction program.

As partframework of our global efficiency plan, formulated in 2012, we have set various efficiency targetsprograms implemented by the Company in its various sites

In order to cope with the challenging business environment prevailing in recent years and the increasing level of competition, we constantly review our total expenses and cost structure, and accordingly implement, from time to time, various efficiency programs designed to reduce costs. Such targetsprograms are subject to risks and uncertainties, and actual results may materially differ from those projectedplanned or expected.For example, further to the Company’s efficiency plan, in December 2016, the Company signed an early retirement agreement with 270 employees of YPH (a Chinese partnership). As a result, in the financial statements for 2016, the Company recorded a provision for employee severance benefits by the amount of about $10 million.

The business environment may cause a decrease in and might adversely affect our sales which outweighs our ability to reduce our costs. If we are unable to achieve our efficiency targets within the expected timeframes, our results of operations would be adversely affected, andas well as our ability to realize other aspects of our strategystrategy. For example, in ICL Iberia in Spain we are consolidating all our sites into a single mine with a single processing plant, which is expected to lead to decreased cost per tonne and create the possibility of removing other bottlenecks and further expansion. The plan involves significant capital investments, as well as manpower reduction. The plan is subject to risks and uncertainties, and actual results may also be slowedmaterially differ from those planned or undermined.

expected and could adversely affect our operations.   

Our

In recent years, the Company’s leverage degree has changed significantly increased in recent years and we frequently engage more frequently in refinancing activities, making us increasingly reliantand we therefore rely on access to the capital markets
The level at favorable terms.

Our short and long term liabilities have significantly increased over recent years. As a result, our principal and interest payment obligations have increased, as well as our costs relating to financing activities. The degree to which we arethe Company is leveraged could affect our ability to obtain additional financing for acquisitions, refinancing of existing debt, working capital or other purposes, could adversely affect our credit rating, and could make us more vulnerable to industry downturns and competitive pressures, as well as to interest rate and other refinancing risks. In addition, capital markets have been more volatile in recent years. Such volatility may adversely affect our ability to obtain financing on favorable terms at times in which we need to access the capital markets regularly.markets. Our ability to refinance existing debt and meet our debt service obligations will be dependent upon our future performance and access to capital markets, which will be subject to financial, business and other factors affecting our operations (including our long term unsecuredlong-term credit ratings), many of which are beyond our control. Our credit rating may be downgraded, among other things, due our future performance, the degree to which we are leveraged and the continued deterioration of the business environment.

20

The instruments relating to our debt contain covenants and, in some cases, require us to meet certain financial ratios. Any failure to comply with these covenants could result in an event of default under the applicable instrument, which could result in the related debt and the debt issued under other instruments becoming immediately due and payable. In such event, we would need to raise funds from alternative sources, which may not be available to us on favorable terms or at all. Alternatively, any such default could require us to sell our assets or otherwise curtail operations in order to satisfy our obligations to our creditors.

Risks Related to Our Industry

Sales of our fertilizer products are subject to the situation in the agricultural industry.

industry

Most of our fertilizer products are sold to producers of agricultural produce. Fertilizer sales may be adversely affected as a result of a decline in agricultural produce prices or the availability of credit, or other events that cause farmers to plant less and consequently reduce their use of fertilizers. For example, periods of high demand, increasing profits and high capacity utilization tend to lead to new investment in crops and increased production. This growth increases supply until the market is over-saturated,over‑saturated, leading to declining prices and declining capacity utilization until the cycle repeats. As a result, the prices and quantities of fertilizer products sold have been volatile. As potash and phosphate prices and quantities sold have a very significant influence on our business results, low prices and/or low quantities and/or a decrease in prices maycould cause our results of operations to fluctuate and, potentially, materially deteriorate.

The price at which we sell our fertilizer products and our sales volumes could fall in the event of industry oversupply conditions, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Alternatively, high prices may lead our customers to delay purchases in anticipation of lower prices in the future, thereby decreasing our sales volumes. These factors could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.


In addition, government policies, and specifically, subsidy levels, may affect the amount of agricultural crops and, as a result, sales of our fertilizer products. Generally, reductions in agricultural subsidies to the farmer or increases in subsidies to local fertilizer manufacturers in countries where we sell our products have an adverse effect on our fertilizer business.

In addition, the ongoing trade dispute between the United States and China may also affect the sales of some of the Company’s products through continued imposition of existing tariffs or increased tariffs or other trade barriers that may negatively affect our sales directly and\or indirectly by affecting our customers’ business and operations, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Finally, the agricultural industry is strongly affected by local weather conditions. Conditions such as heavy storms, long periods of drought, floods, or extreme seasonal temperatures could affect the local crop’s quality and yield and cause a reduction in the use of fertilizers. Loss of sales in an agricultural season in a target country as a result of weather-relatedweather‑related events can cause a loss of sales for the whole year.


21

Sales of our SpecialtyIndustrial Products and Phosphate Solutions segments’ products are affected by various factors that are not within our control, including developments in the end markets of engineeredindustrial materials and food, legislative changes, recession or economic slowdown and changes in currency exchange rates.

rates

The sales of oil drilling products dependsdepend on the extent of operations in the oil drilling market, mainly in deep-sea drilling, which in turn is dependent on oil prices, and on the decisions of oil companies regarding rates of production and areas of production of oil and gas. For example, due to the low level of oil prices, which continued to prevail in 2016, demand for clear solutions for oil and gas drilling was low, as compared to previous years.

In addition, a large portion of the Specialty Solutions segment’s products are used as inputs for end-products. For example, a significant portion of our flame retardants are added to plastic components in electronic devices, including personal computers and televisions. The slowdown of the global economy in recent years, as well as the increasing use of smartphones and tablets at the expense of personal computers, have led to a decline in the demand for personal computers, which in turn caused a decline in the demand for bromine-based flame retardants.

Sales of our SpecialtyIndustrial Products and Phosphate Solutions segments’ products are also affected by global economic conditions in the markets in which we operate. For example, our sales may be affected by the slow economic recovery or any reversal thereof in Europe. In addition, we have significant manufacturing operations in Europe and a large portion of our European sales are in euros, while some of our competitors are manufacturers located outside Europe whose operational currency is the U.S. dollar. As a result, a strengthening of the euro exchange rate vis-à-visagainst the U.S. dollar increases the competitive advantage of these competitors.

Furthermore, our fire safety product line is affected by weather conditions, such as dry weather, Hamseen or Santa Ana winds and similar weather conditions, long periods

The operation of drought and/or extreme temperatures, which may affect the number and scope of fires in target countries due to weather-related events. Periodic changes in these conditions may lead to decreased sales of and demand for our fire safety products.

The operations of thisPhosphate Solutions segment in the food industry is affected by legal provisions and licensing regulations relating to health. This area is characterized by stringent regulatory requirements that are updated from time to time by enforcement agencies. Adjustments of our operations to the changes in regulation, including the technological complexity and feasibility of such adjustments, may adversely affect the sales of our products, incidental to any specific prohibitions and/or adjustments required in order to meet regulatory requirements.

In addition, the ongoing trade dispute between the United States and China may also affect the sales of some of our products through continued imposition of the existing tariffs or increased tariffs or other trade barriers that may negatively affect our sales directly and\or indirectly by affecting our customers’ business and operations, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our magnesium sales in the Unites States are under investigation by the International Trade Administration of the U.S. Department of Commerce and the U.S. International Trade Commission
In October 2018, a petition was filed to the International Trade Administration of the U.S. Department of Commerce and the U.S. International Trade Commission by a US Magnesium company (hereinafter - US Magnesium), to impose antidumping and countervailing duties on imports of magnesium from Israel. US Magnesium claims that imports of magnesium produced in Israel by Dead Sea Magnesium Ltd. are being subsidized and sold at less than fair value in the U.S. market. The US Department of Commerce is expected to issue its preliminary determination with respect to subsidies on May 2, 2019. If these petitions proceed and are successful, these petitions could result in the imposition of tariffs on future imports of our magnesium sales in the United States. 
A decision by U.S. authorities to impose antidumping and countervailing duties on the Company’s magnesium activities in the U.S. and the Company's inability to sell its magnesium on other markets could adversely and materially affect our magnesium business. 

22

Our operations are subject to a crisis in the financial markets.

We are a multinational company and our financial results are affected by global economic trends, changes in the terms of trade and financing and fluctuations of currency exchange rates. A crisis in the financial markets could cause a reduction in the international sources of credit available for the purpose of financing business operations. The impact of such a crisis might be expressed in terms of availability of credit to us and our customers, as well as the price of credit. In addition, the volatility and uncertainty in the European Union affect our activities in this market.

As an industrial chemicals company, we are exposed

The decision by British voters to various legislativeexit the European Union may materially and licensing restrictions in the areas of environmental protection and safety. Related compliance costs may adversely affect our business.
Currently, the UK is scheduled to leave the European Union effective March 29, 2019, but the relationship between the UK and the European Union following a UK departure has not been determined yet. As a result, the impact of Brexit is not yet known and depends on any agreements the UK and European Union may make to retain access to each other's markets, either during a transition period or more permanently. In the absence of a future trade deal, the UK’s trade with the European Union and the rest of the world would be subject to tariffs and duties set by the World Trade Organization. Additionally, the movement of goods between the UK and the remaining member states of the European Union will be subject to additional inspections and documentation checks, leading to possible delays at ports of entry and departure. These changes to the trading relationship between the U.K and European Union would likely result in increased cost of goods imported into and exported from the UK and may decrease the profitability of our UK and other operations. In 2018, 7% of our revenues were generated from our UK operations and 35% of our revenues were generated from our European operations.
In addition, Brexit could lead to legal uncertainly and potentially divergent national laws and regulations, including with respect to data privacy. It is unclear what financial, trade, legal and employment implications the withdraw of the UK from the European Union would have and how the withdrawal would affect us. Adverse consequences such as reduced consumer spending, deterioration in economic conditions, volatility in exchange rates, and prohibitive laws and regulations could materially and adversely affect our business, financial situation and results of our operations.

As a chemical industry company, we are significantly affected by the legal provisions and licensing regime in the areas of environmental protection and safety. Recent years have been characterized by a substantial increase in the stringency and enforcement of legal provisions and regulatory requirements in these areas; the cost of adjustment to and compliance with such regulatory changes, including the technological complexity of such adjustment, as well as compliance with standardization, have all shown a significant upward trend.

Legislative changes around the world may prohibit or restrict use of our products, due to environmental protection, health or safety considerations. Standards adopted in the future may affect us and change our methods of operation. Furthermore, some of our licenses, including business licenses and mining licenses, are for fixed periods and must be renewed from time to time. Renewal of such permits is not certain and may be made contingent on additional conditions and significant costs. For example, following a demand by the Israeli Ministry of Environmental Protection, we have been compelled to make a provision of 62 million dollars for treatment of the existing (historic) solid waste stored at a special site on the plant grounds, in addition to treatment of the current waste generated by current production processes at the plant. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—Regulatory and Environmental, Health and Safety Matters.” 

As a chemical industry company, we are inherently, and by the nature of our activity, exposed to hazards relating to materials, processes, production and mining.

Although we take precautions to enhance the safety of our operations and minimize the risk of disruptions, we are subject to hazards inherent in chemical manufacturing and the related storage and transportation of raw materials, products and waste. These hazards include explosions, fires, mechanical failures, remediation complications, chemical spills and discharges or releases of toxic or hazardous substances. These and other hazards are also inherent in our mining operations, particularly underground mining. These hazards can cause personal injury and loss of life, severe damage to or destruction of property and equipment and environmental damage and may result in suspension of operation and the imposition of civil or criminal penalties. For example, in connection with the 2017 event of the partial collapse of the dyke in Pond 3, which is used for accumulation of phosphogypsum water that is created as part of the production processes in Rotem plants in Israel, the Company is taking action to rectify environmental impacts caused to the Ashalim Stream and its surrounding area, to the extent required. The Company’s actions are being carried out in full coordination and close cooperation with the Israeli environmental authorities. The Company is committed to the matter of environmental protection, and for years has worked closely with the Israeli environmental protection authorities to maintain the Negev’s natural reserves in the area of its facilities. As at the date of this report, the event is being investigated by the Ministry of Environmental Protection and the Nature and Natural Parks Authority.
23

In addition, in October 2018, an application for certification of a class action was filed with the Beer Sheva Magistrate Court against Dead Sea Works Ltd. and Dead Sea Bromine Company Ltd., with respect to a bromine leak that occurred in June 2018, within the premises of Dead Sea Works. According to the plaintiff, the alleged air pollution caused an environmental hazard and a health risk to passersby and to those present in the vicinity of the plant, as well as in the settlements Neot Hakikar and Ein Tamar, and the blocking of Route 90. According to the statement of claim, the Court is requested to award compensation for the alleged damages, in the total amount of about NIS 1.5 million (about $0.4 million). In December 2018, the parties signed a settlement agreement at immaterial amounts to conclude the application proceeding for certification of a class action. The agreement is subject to the Court's approval.
Our manufacturing facilities contain sophisticated manufacturing equipment. In the event of a major disruption in the operations of any of this equipment, we may not be able to resume manufacturing operations for an extended period of time. The occurrence of material operating problems at our facilities, including, but not limited to, the events described above, may have a material adverse effect on us, during and after the period of such operational difficulties, as we are dependent on the continued operation of our production facilities and we may be exposed to substantial liabilities and costs under these circumstances. See
For additional information, see “Item 4.4 - Information on the Company— B. Business Overview— Regulatory and Environmental, Health and Safety Matters.Matters

and Note 20 to our Audited Financial Statements.

As an industrial chemicals company, we are exposed to various legislative and licensing restrictions in the areas of environmental protection and safety. Related compliance costs and liabilities may adversely affect the results of our operations
As a chemical industry company, we are significantly affected by the legal provisions and licensing regime in the areas of environmental protection and safety. Recent years have been characterized by a substantial increase in the stringency and enforcement of legal provisions and regulatory requirements in these areas; the cost of adjustment to and compliance with such regulatory changes, including the technological complexity of such adjustment, as well as compliance with standardization, have all shown a significant upward trend.
Legislative changes around the world may prohibit or restrict use of our products, due to environmental protection, health or safety considerations. Standards adopted in the future may affect us and change our methods of operation. Furthermore, some of our licenses, including business licenses and mining licenses, are for fixed periods and must be renewed from time to time. Renewal of such permits is not certain and may be made contingent on additional conditions and significant costs. For example, in order to comply with the emission permits received in connection with some of our operations in Israel, we are required to make significant capital investment over the next few years. See “Item 4 - Information on the Company— B. Business Overview— Regulatory and Environmental, Health and Safety Matters” and “D. Property, Plant and Equipment— Other Leases, Licenses and Permits”.
24

Due to the nature of our Company, we are exposed to administrative and legal proceedings, both civil and criminal, including as a result of alleged environmental contamination caused by certain of our facilities.

facilities

From time to time we are exposed to administrative and legal proceedings, both civil and criminal, including as a result of alleged environmental contamination caused by certain of our facilities. It should be noted, in that regard, that the Company may be exposed to criminal proceedings, fines and significant impairment of the operation of our facilities as a result of failing to meet the requirements of our emissions permits including the provisions of the Clean Air Law, and particularly, regarding the scope of current and future requirements as prescribed by the Ministry of Environmental Protection respecting the implementation of the Law’s provisions at the Company’s plants in Rotem, Israel, as well as compliance with the timeframes for implementation of such requirements. In addition, from time to time examinations and investigations are conducted by enforcement authorities. See “Item 8. Financial Information—A. Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information—Legal Proceedings.”

Furthermore, from time to time we are exposed to claims alleging physical or property damage, which may cause us financial harm.
In addition, some of the manufacturing or marketing activities (and sometimes transportation and storage as well) entail safety risks that we attempt to minimize but are not able to eliminate. In various countries, including Israel and the United States, legislation exists that can impose liability on us irrespective of our actual intent or negligence. Other laws impose liability on defendants jointly and severally, and sometimes retroactively, and therefore can cause us to be liable for activities executed jointly with others and at times solely by others. We may also be found liable for claims related to land treatment where mining operations and other activities were conducted, even after such activities have ceased.

In addition, over the past several years, there has been an upward trend in the filing of claims together with a request for their certification as class and derivative actions. Due to the nature of such actions, these claims may be for very high amounts and the costs of defending against such actions may be substantial, even if the claims are without merit from the outset. In addition, our insurance policies include coverage limitations, are restricted to certain causes of action and may not cover claims relating to certain types of damages. For example, in June 2015, a request was filed for certification of a claimdamages, such as a class action, in the District Court in Tel-Aviv–Jaffa, against eleven defendants, including a subsidiary, Fertilizers and Chemical Ltd., in respect of claims relating to air pollution in Haifa Bay and for the harm allegedly caused from it to the residents of the Haifa Bay area. The amount of the claim is about $3.8 billion. A preliminary hearing on the request was scheduled for April 30, 2017. In the Company’s estimation, based on the factual material provided to it and the relevant court decisions, the chances that the plaintiffs’ contentions will be rejected are greater than the chances they will be accepted.

intangible damages, etc.

For information respecting additionallegal proceedings and actions, see Note 20 to our audited financial statementsAudited Financial Statements and “Item 8.8 - Financial Information— A. Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information— Legal Proceedings”.

We are exposed to the risk of third-partythird‑party and product liability claims.

claims

We are also exposed to risk of liability related to damage caused to third parties by our operations or by our products. For example, we are subject to claims alleging liability for the impacts from the rising water level at one of our evaporation ponds at the Dead Sea. See Note 20 to our audited financial statements.Audited Financial Statements. We have third-partythird‑party liability insurance for damages caused by our operations and for product liability. However, there is no certainty that this insurance will fully cover all damage for such liability. Moreover, sale of defective products by us might lead to a recall of products by us or by our customers who had used our products.

In addition, the sale of defective products, as well as damage caused to third parties by our activities or our products may harm our public image and reputation and, as a result, materially and adversely affect our business, financial situation and results of operation.

25

Product recalls or other liability claims as a result of food safety and food-borne illness concerns could materially and adversely affect us.
We develop and produce functional food ingredients and phosphate additives for the food industry. Selling ingredients and additives that will be used in products sold for human consumption involves inherent legal and other risks, including product contamination, spoilage, product tampering, allergens, or other adulteration. We could decide to, or be required to, recall products due to suspected or confirmed product contamination, adulteration, misbranding, tampering, or other deficiencies. Product recalls or market withdrawals could result in significant losses due to their costs, the destruction of product inventory, and lost sales due to the unavailability of the product for a period of time.
Because food safety issues could be experienced at the source or by food suppliers or distributors, food safety could, in part, be out of our control. Regardless of the source or cause, any report of food-borne illness or other food safety issues such as food tampering or contamination of products that contain our ingredients or additives could adversely impact our reputation, hindering our ability to renew contracts on favorable terms or to obtain new business, and have a negative impact on our sales. Even instances of food-borne illness, food tampering or contamination of products that do not contain our ingredients or additives could result in negative publicity and could negatively impact our sales.
We may also suffer losses if our products or operations violate applicable laws or regulations, or if our products cause injury, illness, or death. A significant product liability or other legal judgment or a related regulatory enforcement action against us, or a significant product recall, may materially and adversely affect our reputation and profitability. Awards of damages, settlement amounts and fees and expenses resulting from such claims and the public relations implications of any such claims could have an adverse effect on our business. The availability and price of insurance to cover claims for damages are subject to market forces that we do not control, and such insurance may not cover all the costs of such claims and would not cover damage to our reputation. Moreover, even if a product liability or fraud claim is unsuccessful, has no merit, or is not pursued, the negative publicity surrounding assertions against our products or processes could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our insurance policies may not be sufficient to cover all actual losses that we may incur in the future.

future

We maintain, among others, property, environmental, business interruption, casualty and malpractice insurance policies. However, we are not fully insured against all potential hazards and risks incidental to our business, including to damages which may be caused to us by the negligence of our employees. We are subject to various self-retentionsself‑retentions and deductibles under these insurance policies. As a result of market conditions, our loss experience and other factors, our premiums, self-retentionsself‑retentions and deductibles for insurance policies can increase substantially and, in some instances, certain insurance may become unavailable or available only for reduced amounts of coverage. In addition, significantly increased costs could lead us to decide to reduce, or possibly eliminate, coverage. As a result, a disruption of the operations at one of our key facilities or a significant casualty could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. Furthermore, our insurance may not be sufficient to fully cover our expenses related to claims and lawsuits that may be filed against us, or expenses related to legislation that is being promoted and enacted with adverse effect on us.

In addition, it is possible that there are risks that we did not identify and are thus not covered by the insurance policies acquired by the Company.

26

Risks Related to the Company’s Operations in Israel and/or to the Company being an Israeli company

Due to our location in Israel and/or to being an Israeli company, our operations may be exposed to war or acts of terror.

In addition, we are exposed to risks of terrorist acts, war and governmental instability in the regions outside Israel where we operate

War, or acts of terror and\or governmental instability in the regions where we operate are likely to negatively impact us. This impact may manifest itself in production delays, distribution delays, loss of property, injury to employees, and increased insurance premiums. In addition, our plants may be targets for terrorist acts due to the chemicals they store. We do not have property insurance against war or acts of terror, other than compensation from the State of Israel pursuant to Israeli law, which covers only physical property damage, without accounting for reinstatement values.

It would beis noted that since the construction of our initial facilities in the 1950s, we have never experienced material business interruptions as a result of war or acts of terror, but we can provide no assurance that we will not be subject to any such interruptions in the future.

Our computer and communications networks, and production technologies constitute a basic platform for operational continuity and are also potential targets for acts of terror. Potential cyber threats can cause damage to systems and plants, data loss, software vulnerability and external and internal access to sensitive and confidential information. We have implemented a plan for safeguarding and backing up the information systems. The activities include: separation of our information networks from the computerized process systems, physical protection of the computer rooms and terminals and training of employees. However, there is no assurance that our planthe Company will successfully accomplish its goals.

We conduct operations in Israel and therefore our business, financial condition and results of operations may be materially and adversely affected by political, economic and military instability in Israel and its region.

region

Our headquarters, some of our operations, and some of our mining facilities are located in Israel and many of our key employees, directors and officers are residents of Israel. Accordingly, political, economic and security conditions in Israel and the surrounding region may directly affect our business. Since the establishment of Israel in 1948, a number of armed conflicts have taken place between Israel and its Arab neighbors, Hamas (an Islamist militia and political group in the Gaza Strip) and Hezbollah (an Islamist militia and political group in Lebanon). Any hostilities involving Israel or the interruption or curtailment


of trade within Israel or between Israel and its trading partners could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations and could also make it more difficult for us to raise capital. Recent political uprisings, social unrest and violence in various countries in the Middle East and North Africa, including Israel’s neighbors Egypt and Syria, are affecting the political stability of those countries. This instability may lead to deterioration of the political relationships that exist between Israel and these countries and has raised concerns regarding security in the region and the potential for armed conflict. In addition, Iran has threatened to attack Israel and is widely believed to be developing nuclear weapons.

27

In addition, the assessment is that Iran has a strong influence among parties hostile to Israel in areas that neighbor Israel, such as the Syrian government, Hamas in Gaza and Hezbollah in Lebanon. Any armed conflicts, terrorist activities or political instability in the region could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, the political and security situation in Israel may result in parties with whom we have agreements involving performance in Israel claiming that they are not obligated to comply with their undertakings under those agreements pursuant to force majeure provisions in such agreements. In addition, because we are an Israeli company, our sales may be subject to economic boycotts or other sanctions on our products.

Our operations may be disrupted as a result of the obligation of Israeli citizens to perform military reserve service.

service

Many Israeli citizens are obligated to perform one month, and in some cases more, of annual military reserve service until the age of 45 (or older, for reservists with certain occupations) and, in the event of a military conflict, may be called to active duty. Although periods of significant call-upscall‑ups of military reservists which occurred in the past in response to terrorist activities have had no significant impact on our operations, it is possible that military reserve duty call-upscall‑ups will occur in the future, which might disrupt our operations.

It may be difficult to enforce a U.S. judgment against us and our directors and officers, in Israel or the United States, or to serve process on our directors and officers.

officers

We are incorporated under Israeli law. Many of our directors and executive officers reside outside the United States, and most of our assets are located outside the United States. Therefore, a judgment obtained in the United States against us or many of our directors and executive officers, including one based on the civil liability provisions of the U.S. federal securities laws, may not be collectible in the United States and may not be enforced by an Israeli court. It also may be difficult for an investor to effect service of process on these persons in the United States or to assert claims under the U.S. securities laws in original actions instituted in Israel.

The rights and responsibilities as a shareholder are governed by Israeli law which may differ in some respects from the rights and responsibilities of shareholders of U.S. companies. 

companies

We are incorporated under Israeli law. The rights and responsibilities of the holders of our ordinary shares are governed by our Articles of Association and Israeli law. These rights and responsibilities differ in some respects from the rights and responsibilities of shareholders in typical U.S. corporations. In particular, a shareholder of an Israeli company has a duty to act in good faith toward the company and other shareholders and to refrain from abusing its power in the company, including, among other things, in voting at the general meeting of


shareholders on matters such as amendments to a company’s articles of association, increases in a company’s authorized share capital, mergers and acquisitions and interested party transactions requiring shareholder approval. In addition, a shareholder who knows that it possesses the power to determine the outcome of a shareholder vote or to appoint or prevent the appointment of a director or executive officer in the company has a duty of fairness toward the company. There is limited case law available to assist us in understanding the implications of these provisions that govern shareholders’ actions.

28

These provisions may be interpreted to impose additional obligations and liabilities on holders of our ordinary shares that are not typically imposed on shareholders of U.S. corporations.

In addition, in light of the Company’s listing for trading on a stock exchange in the United States, and also considering the fact that our parent company is subject only to the Israeli securities law, we are subject, in certain aspects, to both Israeli law and U.S. law, a fact which may cause us to face both reporting and legal conflicts.
In recent years we have seen a significant rise in the filing of class actions and derivative actions against the Company, its executives and Board members
In recent years we have seen a significant rise in the filing of class actions and derivative actions in Israel against companies, executives and Board members. While the vast majority of such claims are dismissed, companies like us are forced to increasingly invest resources, including monetary expenses and investment of management attention due to these claims. This state of affairs could adversely affect the willingness of our executives and Board members to make decisions which could have benefitted our business operations. Such legal actions could also be taken with respect to the validity or reasonableness of the decisions of our Board of Directors.
Risks Related to Our Ordinary Shares

We have one key shareholder who is our controlling shareholder. This controlling shareholder may makeinfluence the making of decisions with which other shareholders may disagree.

disagree

As ofat December 31, December 2016,2018, the Israel Corporation Ltd. (“Israel Corp.”) holds the controlling interest in the Company.

The interests of Israel Corporation may differ from the interests of other shareholders. Israel Corporation exercises control over our operations and business strategy and has sufficient voting power to control many matters requiring approval by our shareholders, including:

·
The composition of our Board of Directors (other than external directors, as described under “Item 6.“Item 6 - Directors, Senior Management and Employees—C. Board Practices—External Directors”Directors);

·Mergers, acquisitions, divestitures or other business combinations;

·FutureFuture issuances of ordinary shares or other securities;

·
Amendments to our Articles of Association, excluding provisions of the Articles of Association that were determined by virtue of the Special State Share;and

·Dividend distribution policy.

In addition, this concentration of ownership may delay, prevent or deter a change in control, or deprive the investor of a possible premium for his ordinary shares as part of a sale of our Company. Moreover, as a result of the Company’s control structure, our shares may be subject to low tradability, which may hinder the sale and/or exercise of our shares. Furthermore, Israel Corp. may conduct material transactions in our shares, such as its existing margin loans that are secured by pledges of ICL shares, and/or in their organizational structure, that we will not be able to influence but that may have a material adverse effect on our share price.


29

The existence of a Special State Share gives the State of Israel veto power over transfers of certain assets and shares above certain thresholds, and may have an anti-takeover effect.

anti‑takeover effect

The State of Israel holds a Special State Share in our Company and in some of our Israeli subsidiaries. The Special State Share entitles the State of Israel, among other things, to restrict the transfer of certain assets and some acquisitions of shares by any person that would become a holder of specified amounts of our share capital. Because the Special State Share restricts the ability of a shareholder to gain control of our Company, the existence of the Special State Share may have an anti-takeoveranti‑takeover effect and therefore depress the price of our ordinary shares. Furthermore, the existence of the Special State Share may prevent us from realizing and developing business opportunities that we may come across.

To the best of the Company’s knowledge, an inter-ministry team has recently been established, headed by the Ministry of Finance, tasked with arranging the issue of authority and oversight relating to special state shares, interest decrees and reduction of the regulatory burden. As at the date of this report, the Company is unable to estimate what implications this process would have on the Company, if any, but it is possible that the introduction of an additional array of regulatory provisions, coupled with strict enforcement, may increase the uncertainty in the management of Company operations relating to natural resources in Israel and may have a material adverse effect on our business, our financial condition and results of operations.

The market price of our ordinary shares is subject to fluctuation, which could result in substantial losses for our investors.

investors

The stock market in general and the market price of our ordinary shares in particular, are subject to fluctuation, and changes in our share price may occur unrelated to our operating performance. The market price of our ordinary shares on the TASE or NYSE has fluctuated in the past, and we expect it will continue to do so. The market price of our ordinary shares is and will be subject to a number of factors, including:

·Expiration or termination of licenses and and/or concessions;

·General stock market conditions;

·Decisions by the Israeli governmentgovernmental entities that affect us;

·Variations in our and our competitors’ results of operations;

·Changes in earnings estimates or recommendations by securities analysts; and

·General market conditions and other factors, including factors unrelated to our operating performance.

These factors and any corresponding price fluctuations may materially and adversely affect the market price of our ordinary shares and result in substantial losses for our investors.

If equity research analysts issue unfavorable commentary or cease publishing reports about our ordinary shares, the price of our ordinary shares could decline.

decline

The trading market for our ordinary shares relies in part on the research and reports that equity research analysts publish about us and our business. The price of our ordinary shares could decline if one or more securities analysts downgrade our ordinary shares or if those analysts issue other unfavorable commentary or cease publishing reports about us or our business.

30

You may be diluted by the future issuance of additional ordinary shares, among other reasons, for purposes of carrying out future acquisitions, financing needs, and also as a result of our incentive and compensation plans.

plans

As ofat the date of this Annual Report, we have approximately NIS 184181 million ($47 million) NISILS 1 par value (approximately $48 million) shares authorized but unissued. We may choose to raise substantial equity capital in the future in order: to acquire or invest in businesses, products or technologies and other strategic relationships and to finance unanticipated working capital requirements in order to respond to competitive pressures. The issuance of any additional ordinary shares in the future, or any securities that are exercisable for or convertible into our ordinary shares, will have a dilutive effect on our shareholders as a consequence of the reduction in the percentage ownership.
Moreover, these securities may have rights, preferences or privileges senior to those of our existing shareholders. For example, as ofat the date of the report, there are about 1718.9 million outstanding options for our ordinary shares that were issued under our incentive and compensation plan. SeeFor additional information, see Note 21 to our audited financial statementsAudited Financial Statements and “Item 6.“Item 6 - Directors, Senior Management and Employees—E. Share Ownership”. Any ordinary shares that we issue, including under any option plans, would dilute the percentage ownership held by investors.


We may not be able to maintain our dividend payment.

On 17 May 2016,payment

The Company's dividend distribution policy, as determined by our Board of Directors decidedon May 2016 with respect to update our dividend distribution policy, in light of the Company’s efforts to strengthen its financial position and due to the continuing volatility and uncertainty in the agricultural commodities market. In 2016 and 2017, ourand again in March 2018 with respect to 2018 and 2019, is that the Company’s dividend distribution rate will be up to 50% of the annual adjusted net profit, in comparisoncompared with the prior dividend distribution policy of up to 70% of the net profit. This update is intended to increase the certainty of our shareholders in connection with distribution of dividends, while maintaining ICL’s financial strength. Our Board of Directors will revisitreexamine the dividend policy whenat the market conditions stabilize.end of the said period. There is no certainty that our Board of Directors will make changes to the updated dividend policy. In addition, dividends will be paid as declared by the Board of Directors and may be discontinued at any time. All dividends must be declareddecisions regarding dividend distributions are made by ourthe Board of Directors, which will taketakes into account various factors including our profits, our investment plans, our financial statusposition and additional factors as it deems appropriate. Dividend payments are not guaranteed and our Board of Directors may decide, atin its absoluteexclusive discretion, at any time and for whatever reason, not to pay dividends, to reduce the rate of dividends paid, to pay a special dividend, to modify the dividend payout policy or to adopt a share buyback program.

Our ordinary shares are traded on different markets which may result in price variations. 

variations

Our ordinary shares have been traded on the TASE since 1992 and have been listed on the NYSE since September 2014. Trading in our ordinary shares on these markets occurs in different currencies (U.S. dollars on the NYSE and NISILS on the TASE) and takes place at different times (resulting from different time zones, different trading days and different public holidays in the United States and Israel). The trading prices of our ordinary shares on these two markets may differ due to these and other factors. Any decrease in the price of our ordinary shares on one of these markets could cause a decrease in the trading price of our ordinary shares on the other market.


31

As a foreign private issuer, we are permitted to follow certain home country corporate governance practices instead of applicable SEC and NYSE requirements, which may result in less protection than is afforded to investors under rules applicable to domestic issuers.

issuers

As a foreign private issuer, we are permitted to follow certain home country corporate governance practices instead of those otherwise required by the NYSE for domestic issuers. For instance, we have elected to follow home country practices in Israel with respect to, among other things, composition and function of the Audit and Finance Committee and other committees of our Board of Directors and certain general corporate governance matters. In addition, in certain instances we will follow our home country law, instead of NYSE rules applicable to domestic issuers, which require that we obtain shareholder approval for certain dilutive events, such as an issuance that will result in a change of control of our Company, certain transactions other than a public offering involving issuances of a 20% or more interest in our Company and certain acquisitions of the stock or assets of another company. Following our home country corporate governance practices as opposed to the requirements that would otherwise apply to a U.S. company listed on the NYSE may provide less protection than is afforded to investors under the NYSE rules applicable to domestic issuers.


In addition, as a foreign private issuer, we are exempt from the rules and regulations under the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), related to the furnishing and content of proxy statements and the requirements of Regulation FD (Fair Disclosure), and our directors, officers and principal shareholders are exempt from the reporting and short-swingshort‑swing profit recovery provisions of Section 16 of the Exchange Act. In addition, we are not required under the Exchange Act to file annual, quarterly and current reports and financial statements with the SEC as frequently or as promptly as domestic companies whose securities are registered under the Exchange Act.

We have

The Company has a history of quarterly fluctuations in the results of ourits operations due to the seasonal nature of some of our products.its products and its dependence on the commodities markets. We expect these fluctuations to continue. Fluctuations in the results of our operations may disappoint investors and result in a decline in our share price.

price

We have experienced, and expect to continue to experience, fluctuations in our quarterly results of operations. Our sales have historically, and less significantly so over the last three years, been stronger in the second and third quarters of each year. This is due to the mix of products we sell in those quarters, as well as the mix of sales in different countries. If, for any reason, our revenues in the second and third quarters are below seasonal norms, we may not be able to recover these sales in subsequent quarters and our annual results of operations may not meet expectations. If this occurs, the market price of our ordinary shares could decline.


32

Item 4 – INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY


A. HISTORY AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE COMPANY

Our legal name is Israel Chemicals Ltd. and our commercial name is ICL. We are a public company and operate today as a limited liability company under the laws of Israel. Our registered office and principal place of businessheadquarters is located at Millennium Tower, 23 Aranha Street, P.O. Box 20245, Tel Aviv 61202, Israel. The telephone number at our registered office is +972-3-684-4400.+972‑3‑684‑4400. Our website address is www.icl-group.com.www.icl‑group.com. The reference to our website is intended to be an inactive textual reference and the information on, or accessible through, our website is not intended to be part of this Annual Report.

We were

ICL was established in Israel in 1968 as a government-owned and-operated -operated company in Israel, and operate today as a limited liability company under the laws of Israel. In 1992, following a decision of the Israeli government to privatize the Company, the State published a sales offer prospectus and our shares were listed for trade on the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange. In September 2014, we listed our shares for trade on the New York Stock Exchange, and they are currently traded in Tel Aviv and in New York. The purpose of the listing was to expand our global base of investors, improve liquidity, increase our access to global financial markets, and improve our capital structure management flexibility. For additional information on the Company's history and development, see “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—Our History". For information about our principal capital expenditures and divestitures during the last three fiscal years, see “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—B. Liquidity and Capital Resources—Principal Capital Expenditures and Divestitures”.

B. BUSINESS OVERVIEW

Company Overview

We are a leading global specialty minerals company that operates a unique, integrated business model. We extract raw materials and utilize sophisticated processing and product formulation technologies to add value to customers in three attractive end-markets: agriculture, food and engineered materials. Our operations are organized under two segments: the Essential Minerals Segment and the Specialty Solutions Segment. The Essential Minerals Segment includes the ICL Potash & Magnesium and ICL Phosphate business lines. The Specialty Solutions Segment includes four business lines: ICL Industrial Products, ICL Specialty Fertilizers, ICL Advanced Additives and ICL Food Specialties. Following recent management decision regarding the Company structure, ICL Specialty Fertilizers business line will be a part of the Essential Minerals segment, starting from January 2017.

Our principal assets include:

·Access to one of the world’s richest, longest-life and lowest-cost sources of potash and bromine (the Dead Sea).

·Access to potash mine in Spain.

·Access to potash and polysulphate mine in the United Kingdom.

·Bromine compounds processing facilities located in Israel, the Netherlands and China.

·A unique integrated phosphate value chain, from phosphate rock mines in the Negev Desert in Israel and in China to our value-added downstream products in Israel, Europe, the United States, Brazil and China.

·Production of exclusive texture and stability solutions for products in the food industry, tailored to specific customer needs, based on development of new-process technologies.

·Production of tailor-made, highly-effective specialty fertilizers offering both improved value to the grower and precise feeding which is essential for plant development and optimizes crop yield.

·An extensive global logistics and distribution network with operations in over 30 countries.

·A focused and highly experienced group of technical experts developing production processes, new applications, formulations and products for our three key end-markets: agriculture, food and engineered materials.

For the year ended December 31, 2016, we generated total sales of $5,363 million, operating loss of $3 million, adjusted operating income of $582 million, net loss attributable to the shareholders of the company of $122 million and adjusted net income attributable to the shareholders of the company of $451 million. The sales of ICL Essential Minerals amounted to $2,437 million and the operating income amounted to $343 million, the sales of ICL Specialty Solutions amounted to $3,148 million and the operating income amounted to $589 million.

For a breakdown of sales and a geographic market by segments for each of the last three fiscal years, see “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—A. Operating Results”.

Our Industries

The majority of our businesses compete in the global fertilizer and specialty chemicals industries.

Fertilizers

Fertilizers serve an important role in global agriculture by providing vital nutrients that help increase both the yield and the quality of crops. Of the three nutrients that are required for plant growth – potassium, phosphorus and nitrogen – ICL supplies the first two. There are no artificial substitutes for potassium and phosphorous. Although these nutrients are naturally found in soil, they are depleted over time by farming, which could lead to declining crop yields and land productivity. To replenish these nutrients, farmers must apply fertilizers. The demand for fertilizers is volatile and seasonal. In the Company’s estimation, the policy of most countries is to ensure an orderly supply of high-quality food to their residents, including by encouraging agricultural production, which should preserve the long-term growth trend of fertilizer consumption.


Potashhelps regulate a plant’s physiological functions and improves plant resilience, providing crops with protection from drought, disease, parasites and cold weather. Unlike phosphate and nitrogen, potash does not require additional chemical conversion to be used as a nutrient fertilizer. Potash is mined either from underground mines or, less frequently, from solutions found in nature, such as the Company’s operations in the Dead Sea. According to estimates from the United States Geological Survey, six countries accounted for approximately 87% of the world’s aggregate potash production and the top nine producers (considering China as a single producer even though there are numerous producers in China) accounted for approximately 94% of the world’s production in 2016. Based on preliminary estimates of FertEcon Potash Outlook in December 2016, worldwide sales of potash in 2016 were lower than in 2015, mainly as a result of the late signing of supply contracts with China and India.

The average prices in 2016 were significantly lower than the prices in 2015, following the negative price trend that started in the second half of 2015 and continued in the first half of 2016.This trend came to a halt in the third quarter of 2016 and reversed in the fourth quarter wherein moderate price increases were recorded in the “SPOT” market. The main reasons for the decline in prices in the first half of the year were, as noted, the failure to sign contracts with China and India, a further decrease in the prices of agricultural commodities and a weakening of the currencies of the importing countries. The signing of supply contracts with Indian and Chinese customers in July 2016 and the significant volumes shipped to these countries as a result, led to tightening of the supply-demand balance, which was also supported by increased customer activity in the “SPOT” markets, mainly in Brazil. These developments supported the price stabilization and moderate recovery in the second half of the year and into 2017.

Imports of potash into China in 2016 totaled 6.8 million tonnes – a decrease of about 28% compared with imports of 9.4 million tonnes last year. The record quantities of potash imported into China in 2015 caused an accumulation of large inventories in the country. This fact enabled importers to postpone the signing of contracts to the first half of 2016 and gave them a stronger bargaining position in negotiations with reference to import prices in the new contract.

Imports of potash into India were lower in 2016 than in 2015. The slowdown stems mainly from the high inventory levels at the beginning of the year, as a result of low demand in 2015, and the delay in the contract signing for the 2016/17 fiscal year. As a result of signing of the new contract – at a significantly lower price – in the second half of the year the demand returned to normal levels. During 2016, India imported 3.8 million tonnes of potash, constituting a decrease of 4.3%, compared with 4 million tonnes imported in 2015.

Imports of potash into Brazil in 2016 increased significantly over 2015, but did not reach the record imports recorded in 2014. In 2016, potash imports into Brazil totaled 8.8 million tonnes, constituting an increase of 5.3%, compared with imports of 8.3 million tonnes in 2015. The improvement in demand in Brazil stems from an increase in the growing areas and higher profitability of the farmers.

According to the report of the IFA from June 2016, the aggregate global demand for potash for agricultural and other uses is projected to grow at an average annual rate of 2.6%, from 38.9 million tons of K2O in 2016 up to 43.1 million tons of K2O in 2020.

Polysulphate– during 2016, the Company decided to accelerate the transition from extracting and producing potash to producing polysulphate at its ICL UK mine. ICL Potash and Magnesium will act to expand the polysulphate market by means of, among other things, development of a wide range of innovative polysulphate products.


Magnesium– global demand for metal magnesium continues to be constrained by lower economic activity in China, Brazil and Europe as well as year-end destocking. In the United States, supply dynamics are impacted by pure magnesium imports from Russia, Kazakhstan and Turkey. Additionally, consumption is being displaced as key sectors, such as primary aluminum and titanium production, have shifted production to other markets, including Asia and Canada. Recently a number of decisions were made, that encouraged vehicle weight reduction mainly due to environmental protection requirements. As a result, a positive development has led to an increase in the demand for products based on magnesium alloys. A new Turkish manufacturer of magnesium (ESAN) has started to supply magnesium to the markets in the US and Brazil, for the purpose of making a quality check. It was expected that this supplier would expand the market supply by about 5 thousand tonnes in 2016 and about 15 thousand tonnes in 2017. Currently, it seems that this new manufacturer is not progressing as planned. Pure magnesium prices in the US and Brazilian markets remained under pressure as a consequence of the aforementioned change in supply dynamics. At the end of 2016, Chinese pure magnesium traded in the range of $2,460 - $2,480 per ton (FOB Chinese port), an increase of about 30% compared to 2015.

Phosphate is essential for plant root development and is required for photosynthesis, seed germination and efficient usage of water. Phosphate fertilizers are produced from phosphate rock and sulfuric acid and occasionally also include ammonia. The principal phosphate fertilizer producing regions have plentiful reserves of high quality, phosphate rock that can be mined at a low cost. In 2016, the vast majority of the world’s phosphate rock production was in China, the United States, Morocco and Russia. According to an IFA report from June 2016, the global demand for phosphoric acid (which constitutes a raw material for the main phosphate fertilizers) is forecast to grow at an annual rate of 2.4%, from 44.5 million tonnes of phosphorous pentoxide (P2O5) in 2016 to 48.9 million tonnes of phosphorous pentoxide up to 2020.

In 2016, the decrease in the prices of phosphate fertilizers that started in 2015 continued. These price decreases stemmed from a combination of supply and demand factors. On the demand side, imports into India (the main importer of DAP) were low due to high inventories and an erratic monsoon season. On the other hand, expansion of the growing areas in Brazil gave rise to a significant increase in the demand for fertilizers, in general, and phosphate fertilizers, in particular. In 2016, imports of phosphate fertilizers (DAP, MAP, TSP and SSP) into Brazil reached 4.9 million tonnes, constituting an increase of 17%, compared with imports of 4.2 million tonnes in the prior year. The demand in the US was low mainly as a result of a decline in the prices of agricultural commodities. The US demand picked up towards the end of 2016 and minor increases were reported in certain inland destinations, indicating a certain recovery in the US market. On the supply side, the decline in the global demand intensified the competition in the fertilizer market. The two main competitors in the export market, the Moroccan phosphate company, OCP, and the Saudi Arabian producer, Ma’aden, reduced their sale prices in order to maintain their market shares, which were unfavorably impacted in 2015 by a massive penetration of Chinese products. The price decline had a negative effect on the profit margins of most the Chinese manufacturers, who were forced to reduce the quantities produced. As a result, DAP exports from China, which increased by 52% and 42% in 2014 and 2015, respectively, decreased by 15% in 2016 to about 6.8 million tonnes. Based on the forecasts of market analysts, there is significant excess production capacity in China, and in the past few months production in the industry is running at 50%–60% of capacity, which brought some


stability in phosphate prices in China and the world towards the end of 2016. Towards the end of 2016, the Chinese government cancelled the $14/tonne export tax on DAP. This is expected to help local exporters, but may hamper attempts to increase global prices. Nevertheless, to the best of the Company’s knowledge, the Chinese phosphate producers are planning to reduce production in 2017 to a level of 15 million tonnes compared to production of approximately 17 million tonnes in 2016 and compared to an operational capacity of 22 million tonnes. 

In 2016, there was a drop in the demand for phosphate rock in the two major markets – India and China. The decline in India stemmed from an increase in imports of phosphoric acid that acted to reduce the demand for phosphate rock, despite the increase in fertilizer production. In China, the demand fell due to a decrease in production of downstream products. The decline in demand along with the decline in fertilizer prices caused a drop in the prices of phosphate rock of 5%–10%. This trend, in addition to other trends, had a negative effect on the results of ICL's joint venture in China, as described in “Item 5.A – Operating Results – Trends Affecting ICL Phosphate”.

The barriers facing entry of new competitors into the potash market are significant, and include a long lead time and an investment of billions of dollars of capital per operation. For example, economically recoverable potash deposits are scarce, typically deep in the earth and geographically concentrated. Nonetheless, two large fertilizer companies are carrying on new (“Green Field”) projects, which are scheduled to enter into production in 2017. The German potash producer, K+S, is developing the “Legacy” project in Canada, having a planned production capacity of about 2 million tons per year. In Russia, EuroChem is developing two new mines, each having a planned annual production capacity of 2.3 million tons.

In the phosphate market, the need for access to competitive sources of multiple raw material feedstocks (phosphate rock, sulfuric acid and ammonia) combined with the complexity of developing an economically feasible downstream value chain also acts as a significant entry barrier with respect to new competitors.

The specialty fertilizers market is growing faster than the conventional fertilizers market. Specialty fertilizers are generally used for specialty crops (such as greenhouses and horticulture) but are also expanding into usage for larger specialty field crops. Farmers use fertilizers that are customized to meet the needs of specific crops, soil types and climates, in order to maximize yield and quality. The specialty fertilizers allow more precise application of the critical foundations for development of the plant (phosphorus acid, potassium and nitrogen) and micro-nutrients. In addition to reduction of the environmental impacts, the specialty fertilizers permit efficient and effective fertilization of different types of produce (fruits, vegetables, etc.). Increase in the demand for healthier food is expected to give rise to an increase in the use of specialty fertilizers. These fertilizers include, among others, “enhanced efficiency fertilizers” which permit greater fertilizing efficiency and which include, controlled release fertilizers (CRF) (which allow for precision release of nutrients over time) and delayed/slow release fertilizers (SRF) (which allow for a very slow release of nutrients) (nitrogen and potassium only), liquid fertilizers integrated in irrigation systems and in herbicides and fully water soluble fertilizers (which are most commonly used for fertilization by means of drip irrigation systems and foliar spraying).


Specialty Phosphates

Phosphate-based specialty products deliver additional value to ICL beyond the commodity phosphates with two main applications: for the food industry, as additives for improved texture, stability and shelf-life of processed foods in the markets for meat, bakery, dairy products and soft-drinks as well as in various industrial applications, including, road surfaces, oil and paint additives, forest-fire retardants and fire extinguishing products. Additionally phosphate is also used in a broad range of downstream products in the electronics, energy and construction industries. Demand for phosphate-based products is driven by global economic and population growth and improved living standards, which promote the adoption of more sophisticated food products and improved industrial products and production technologies. While most of the global demand for Specialty Phosphates is constant during the year, the Fire Safety product line shows seasonal peaks in Q2 and Q3 based on increased wildfire activity in North America during the hot and dry periods in the spring and summer. The Company also manufactures products based on phosphate additives for a wide range of uses in the food industry. In addition, the Company produces integrated solutions based on phosphate additives and dairy proteins. The Company manufactures these specialty phosphate downstream products with higher added value, based on phosphate rock as the main raw material. In this respect the business tailors the products to the customers’ needs by exploiting synergies between food phosphates and proteins.

Bromine

The largest commercial use of bromine is in the area of bromine-based flame retardants, which accounts for approximately 40% of the demand for bromine. To meet fire-safety requirements, flame retardants are used as inputs in manufacturing processes and end products, such as, plastic enclosures for consumer electronics, printed circuit boards, insulation materials for construction, furniture, automobiles, and textiles. Additional commercial uses of bromine are in the following industries: rubber production, oil and gas drilling, water purification, intermediate materials for production of medicines and pesticides, and others. The flame retardant market, after facing contraction mainly in printed circuit board applications over the last few years, has stabilized with the growth in automotive electronics offsetting the decline in consumer electronic applications, ICL and its competitors are continuing to develop new products and uses on an ongoing basis.

Bromine is found naturally in seawater, underground brine deposits and other water reservoirs, such as the Dead Sea. The Dead Sea is the world’s premier source of bromine, with concentration levels significantly higher than in regular seawater, and it accounts for about half of the global supply. Because it has the highest concentration of bromine, the Dead Sea is the most economical supply source as the least amount of water must be extracted and evaporated to produce bromine.

The bromine industry is highly concentrated, with three companies accounting for approximately 80% of the worldwide capacity in 2016 (ICL, Albemarle and Chemtura). Lack of access to a low-cost source of supply, such as the Dead Sea, constitutes a significant barrier to entry for aspiring competitors, as well as the requirement for a logistical supply system and specialized transport vehicles (isotanks). The Company estimates that approximately 70% of the global elemental bromine production is consumed internally by the bromine manufacturers, since there is a very small market for elemental bromine. To increase the global use of elemental bromine, development of complex production facilities for downstream products is required.


Markets

ICL’s revenues are derived from three core end-markets: agriculture, food and engineered materials. ICL focuses on markets and products which we can add value through its integrated value chain all the way from the minerals into the downstream product.

 

Agriculture

Global fertilizer demand is driven mainly by the supply/demand balance with respect grains and other agriculture products, which is reflected in their prices. Supply of agriculture products is influenced by weather, planted areas and input usage, while price is primarily influenced by population growth and dietary changes in the developing world:

Population and Income Growth per Capita.Historically, growth in world fertilizer consumption has been closely correlated with growth in the world’s population, which is expected to increase by over 2.0 billion and to reach 9.4 billion by 2050, according to the U.S. Census Bureau. Currently, developed countries use fertilizers more intensively than developing countries and, therefore, produce crops at much higher yields. Economic growth in emerging markets supports food demand and thus fertilizer use. In addition, growth in income per capita in developing markets results in a shift to more protein-rich diets through higher meat consumption, which requires larger quantities of grain for their growth, thus leading to an increased demand for seeds used in animal feed. According to the IMF (International Monetary Fund), income per capita in developing countries is expected to grow by an average rate of 5.9% annually from 2016 to 2021.

Declining Arable Land per Capita. As the world’s population grows, mainly in cities, farmland per capita decreases and more food production is required from each acre of farmland. This, in turn, requires increased yield per planted area. According to data from the FAO, the


amount of arable land per capita is expected to decrease from 0.218 hectares per person to 0.197 hectares per person between 2012 and 2030. Effectively, new arable land is available only in limited quantities, and is concentrated mainly in Brazil. Therefore, the only viable path to increase crop production is through a yield increase in existing farms in developing countries, mainly in China, India, Russia, Africa and Central America, by optimizing the use of fertilizers (especially improving the balance in the use of potash and phosphates versus the use of nitrogen fertilizers), together with water availability and better seeds.

Grain Stock-to-Use Ratio. The pressure on food demand and unfavorable weather in the main growing areas has resulted in low levels of the grain stock-to-use ratio (a metric index of the level of carryover stock) since the beginning of the 21st century and up to the 2012/13 agriculture season, as illustrated by the chart below. Since then, several years of favorable weather resulted in an increase in this ratio from 20% in 2012/13 to a projected 24.3% in 2016/17 agriculture year, according to the USDA report dated February 9, 2017. This level is still lower than the level of 30.4% for the 2000/2001 season and the levels recorded during the 1990s. An increase in the grain stock-to-use ratios generally indicates that grain prices may decline (due to higher grain supply) and during 2016, corn and wheat prices decreased by 5% and 13%, respectively while soybean prices increased by 14%. Lower grain prices reduce the incentive of farmers to make intensive fertilizer application. Nevertheless, the February 2017 USDA projection of the stock-to-use ratio for the 2016/17 agriculture season is, after three consecutive years of increases, down by 0.5% compared to the 2015/16 season, as the global ending stocks of corn, soybean and wheat all decreased, mostly due to increased consumption and despite a slight increase of global corn production. As of the publication date, wheat, corn and soybean prices increased by about 8%, 5% and 3% respectively.

  

The ongoing improvements in  agricultural technology have given rise to a high increase in the rate of use of drip irrigation (more than 10% per year) and an increase in demand for specialty fertilizers (liquid and water soluble fertilizers). In addition, the decrease in arable land per capita, along with the growing population, supports the use of more sophisticated fertilizers that will enable higher yields.


Increased environmental awareness is also contributing to the use of specialty fertilizers (since they result in higher nutrient efficiency), and the increasing pursuit of an improved quality of life is leading to a higher consumption of fruits and vegetables, which are considered specialty crops.

All of the above is expected to contribute to a higher long-term demand for specialty fertilizer solutions.

Food

Consumer demand for different food products has changed dramatically over the last several decades, driven by a number of trends and processes, including, increased per capita incomes, demographic shifts and lifestyle changes. Longer working hours, changing family structures, increased awareness of nutrition and health issues and access to a broader variety of food products result in growing demand for more sophisticated, protein-enriched, unprocessed (“clean label”) and non-allergenic (“free from”) food products with longer shelf lives.

This changing demand includes greater demand for more sophisticated food products and processed food products with enhanced nutritional value and balance and improved flavor, texture and appearance. An increasingly longer supply chain and consumer awareness of food waste also drives the demand for longer shelf-life and food stability. These trends act as long-term drivers of demand for food additives, such as, phosphate derivatives, phosphate and protein containing formulations and hygiene products for the processed meat, bakery, dairy and beverages industries.

Engineered Materials

Demand for the engineered materials that ICL manufactures, which include solutions based on bromine and phosphorus, is driven by population growth, increased standards of living, higher environmental awareness and increased focus on cost effective production. These trends drive demand for more environmentally friendly and safer industrial products as well as efficient and reliable service suppliers. ICL’s products serve a diverse number of industries, such as, construction, electronics, energy (including renewable energy), water and pharmaceutical. Phosphoric acid is incorporated as a raw material into industrial grade product solutions that serve the needs of the water, cleaning, paints and coatings, and metal treatment industries.  Phosphorous Penta Sulphide (p2s5) is manufactured to serve the lubricating oil additives and insecticide markets. Increased regulation and environmental awareness also result in greater demand for flame retardants including polymeric and reactive flame retardants, mercury emission control solutions, forest fire retardants, bromine-based biocides for water treatment, bromine, magnesia and potassium chloride-based intermediates for the pharmaceutical industry and oil additive solutions.

Our Competitive Strengths

ICL attributes its business strength to the following competitive advantages:

·Unique portfolio of special mineral assets. ICL benefits from access to one of the world’s resource-rich, long-life and low-cost raw materials, mainly potash and bromine. ICL’s access to these resources is based on an exclusive concession from the State of Israel for extraction of minerals from the Dead Sea. ICL holds licenses to mine potash and salts from underground mines in Spain, with vast, long-term reserves, as well as in the UK, where it discovered and started mining a unique mineral (polysulphate). ICL also has access to phosphate rock in the Negev Desert based on mining concessions from the State of Israel and it holds a concession for mining phosphates in two mines in China.

Access to these assets provides ICL with a consistent, reliable supply of raw materials, allowing it to produce its products on a large scale and supporting its integrated value chain into specialty, value added products.

Dead Sea in Israel: ICL’s potash and bromine production facilities at the Dead Sea enjoy lower production costs compared to mining potash from underground deposits or extracting bromine from less concentrated sources, due to the high concentration and virtually unlimited supply of minerals in the Dead Sea and due to the unique solar evaporation production process which is less energy intensive. Furthermore, the Dead Sea’s hot and dry climate allows ICL to store outdoors very large amounts of potash (exceeding one full year of production) at a low cost. This advantage enables ICL to operate its potash facilities at full production capacity despite periodic fluctuations in demand and to react faster when demand returns. In addition, ICL benefits from the geographic proximity of its facilities in Israel to seaports and from Israel’s geographic positioning vis-à-vis its main geographical markets (especially the fast-growing markets of India, China and Brazil), reducing transportation, logistics costs and time-to-market. While ICL benefits from these advantages, it expects to incur infrastructure-related costs to harvest salt from Pond 5 at its Dead Sea complex, which is its central evaporation pond, to avoid the need to continue to raise the water level in the pond. In addition, while the supply in the Dead Sea is virtually unlimited, ICL’s access to this supply of potash and bromine pursuant to the concession is subject to the need to construct a new pumping station. Moreover, ICL is scheduled to pay taxes in the future at a higher rate following passage of the Law for Taxation of Profits from Natural Resources which entered into effect on January 1, 2016, except with respect to potash sales from ICL Dead Sea where the effective date is January 1, 2017. See “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business”.

United Kingdom and Spain mineral assets: In addition to its operations in Israel, ICL mines potash in the United Kingdom and Spain. The geographical proximity to Europe, the primary market of these assets, provides ICL with logistical advantages reflected in lower transportation costs, faster time-to-market and higher net-back prices. In Spain, ICL is progressing with its project to move from operating two mines and processing facilities into concentrating them into one location with better ore grade and vast reserves which will contribute to lower costs. In the UK we are increasing the production of Polysulphate, a unique mineral containing four nutrients (potassium, sulphur, calcium and magnesium) which can be used as a natural fertilizer and provides a very cost effective solution, as its production does not require chemical processing.

Integrated phosphate value chain: Due to ICL’s access to phosphate rock in the Negev Desert and in China, it is the only sizeable downstream, fully backward integrated phosphate player. ICL mines and processes phosphate rock from three open-pit mines in the Negev Desert under mining concessions with the State of Israel and from one open-pit mine in Haikou (China), using conventional methods, under phosphate mining license that was issued in July 2015 by the Division of Land and Resources of the Yunnan district in China. Approximately three-quarters of the phosphate rock produced are used internally to manufacture phosphate fertilizers and phosphoric acid, with the balance being sold to external producers. ICL’s phosphate assets are the base for its vast and diversified specialty phosphates product portfolio used in food and industrial application. These business lines add additional value on top of the commodity business and reduce ICL’s exposure to the


volatility in the commodity markets. See “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business. The mining operations are dependent on concessions, licenses and permits granted by the respective governments in the countries wherein they are located.”

·Diversification into higher value-added specialty products leveraging ICL’s integrated business model. ICL’s integrated production processes are based on a synergistic value chain that allows it to both efficiently convert raw materials into value-added downstream products and to utilize the by-products. For example, in phosphates, ICL utilizes its backward integration to produce specialty phosphates used in the food industry and for engineered materials applications, which provides it with additional margins on top of the commodity margin. The food ingredients provide solutions for improved texture and stability for meat, dairy and bakery products. In addition, as a by-product of the potash production at the Dead Sea, ICL generates brines with the highest bromine concentration globally. ICL’s bromine-based products serve the electronics, construction, oil and gas and other industries

·Leading positions in markets with high barriers to entry. ICL is a global leader in many of the key markets in which it operates, including elemental bromine, PK fertilizers, specialty fertilizers, specialty phosphates and phosphate-based food additives. ICL believes it is generally ranked among the top leaders in several markets (e.g. potash, polysulphate, elemental bromine, specialty fertilizers – CRF, MKP, PK, forest fire retardants, phosphorous-based flame retardants etc.).

Most of ICL’s businesses rely on natural resources that are scarce and concentrated in the hands of a few market participants. ICL’s exclusive concessions, intellectual property (unique knowledge, technologies and patents for various products and applications), world-wide marketing and distribution network and high industry start-up costs for new market entrants add further significant barriers to entry.

·Strategically located production and logistics assets. ICL benefits from the proximity of its facilities, both in Israel and Europe, to developed economies (western Europe) and emerging markets (such as China, India and Brazil). For example, in Israel, ICL ships from two seaports: the Port of Ashdod (with access to Europe and South America) and the Port of Eilat (with access to Asia, Africa and Oceania). Access to these two ports provides ICL with two distinctive advantages versus its competitors: (1) it has lower plant gate-to-port costs and ocean freight costs, and transportation costs from ports to target markets, which lower its overall cost structure and (2) it has faster time to markets due to its proximity to end-markets, allowing it to opportunistically fill short lead-time orders, strengthening its position with its customers. In 2015, ICL completed establishment of the YPH JV with Yunnan Phosphate Chemicals Group, China’s leading phosphate manufacturer, which strengthens its position in China. In addition, ICL is the sole producer with the ability to transport potash and phosphates from the same port (which it does in Israel). ICL’s sales are balanced between emerging markets (approximately 35% of 2016 sales) and developed economies (approximately 65% of 2016 sales).

·Operating cash flow generation and closely monitored capital allocation approach. Despite the sharp decrease in commodity fertilizers prices during 2016, cash flow optimization initiatives, efficiency measures and the balancing effect of ICL’s specialty businesses enabled it to generate operating cash flow of $966 million, compared to $573 million in 2015. These cash flows are used to implement ICL’s capital allocation approach according to which it consistently examines its work plan and investments. ICL must

balance between three interacting pillars – drive of ICL’s long-term value creation through investments in its growth and reduction of its debt level, while still providing solid dividend yield. In the beginning of 2016 ICL updated its dividend policy for 2016-2017 to a payout ratio of up to 50% of adjusted net income (compared to up to 70% of net income previously). During 2016, ICL declared dividends of $222 million, of which $162 million was paid during 2016 and the balance was paid in January 2017, reflecting a dividend yield of 4.3%, compared to a yield of 4.4% in 2015 (based on the average share price for the year). See “Item 8- Dividend policy.”

·Professional expertise and culture of collaboration and determination. ICL’s operations are managed by an international management team with extensive industry experience. ICL develops leaders with strong experience in their fields and the culture in order to drive change and innovation within the Company. ICL also brings in leaders from outside the Company to supplement its expertise. ICL focuses on nurturing and empowering talent through a global platform of qualification, collaboration and communication that reinforces innovation.

Our Strategy

ICL’s integrated business model is based on its unique access to essential minerals that support specialty downstream activities focusing on our three core markets – Agriculture, Food and Engineered Materials. Our strategy going forward is to reach cost leadership in the Essential Mineral chains and expanding the downstream activities by developing backward-integrated value-added solutions for our Essential Minerals chain. Over the years, we have developed a balanced portfolio, which supports long-term stability and growth. Our integrated business model generates significant operational synergies attributable to the combination of our attractive assets and value-added solutions

 

Our corporate strategy is to fulfill the essential needs of our customers in our three core markets – Agriculture, Food and Engineered Materials. We have developed a strategic plan based on three value-creating pillars: (1) Efficiency: continued streamlining of the existing operations; (2) Growth: organic and high-synergy driven external expansion of our value chain, from the Specialty Minerals market to the Agriculture, Food and Engineered Materials markets; and (3) Enablers: creating one global ICL, strengthening innovation, providing an empowering environment for our employees and aligning management with our external and internal stakeholders to support our growth and efficiency goals.


Our key strategic initiatives include:

To continuously improve the cost base and initiate G&A cost efficiency initiatives.We have successfully implemented cost reduction initiatives in our potash, bromine and phosphate operations. These efforts will continue to improve our competitiveness and profitability.

ICL has established an Operational Excellence initiative for implementation of the most advanced practices in the industry. The ICL Operational Excellence implementation plan covers transformation of all our operations within 3 years. Our major potash, bromine and phosphate sites have been implementing the transformation plan since 2014. In addition, ICL has already initiated a plan to reduce its G&A costs. ICL is continuing to assess and identify additional potential areas of savings and expects to continue to do so during 2017.

To base our future expansions on our existing Essential Minerals reserves. ICL has already expanded its production capacity at the Dead Sea to about 4 million tonnes per annum. Furthermore, ICL has the potential to further expand the production capacity at the Dead Sea and its reserves at ICL Iberia. At ICL Iberia in Spain, we are consolidating our sites into one mine with one processing facility, which will reduce the cost per tonne and create opportunities for additional debottlenecking and further expansion.

At ICL UK, we are shifting from production of Potash to Polysulphate (reaching capacity of 1 million tonnes in 2020), and extending the mining area to provide additional resources.

In October 2016, we decided to discontinue the investment in the Allana project in Ethiopia, in view of the Ethiopian government's failure to provide the necessary infrastructures and regulatory framework for the Project. We intend to focus our growth on our key existing operating assets.

With respect to our phosphate reserves, in the beginning of 2016, a National Outline Plan, which includes Barir field (which is located in southern part of the South Zohar field), was submitted for comments by the various committees, which provided their comments and recommendations toward the end of 2016. In February 2017, a hearing was held by the Committee for Principle Planning Matters, whereat decisions were made with respect to the continued advancement of mining in the South Zohar field. For further information in that respect see “Item 4. Information on the Company—D. Property, Plants and Equipment—Mineral Extraction and Mining Operations”.

It should be noted that the residents of Arad are continuing to object to advancement of the mining plan and even to test mining. If mining approval is not received for the Barir field, this will significantly impact the Group’s future mining reserves in the medium and long term. See “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business". Our mining operations are dependent on concessions, licenses and permits granted to us by the respective governments in the countries where they are located.

In October 2015, we completed formation of a joint venture company (“YPH JV”) with Yunnan Phosphate Chemicals Group Corporation Ltd. (“YPC”), a Chinese phosphate producer, with 50% stake – a step that we expect will nearly double our global phosphate market share. YPH JV is expected to have phosphate operations in China with annual production capacity of nearly 1 million tonnes of fertilizers and other downstream products, with backward integration into phosphate rock mines. Our key effort is to implement cost-cutting initiatives and capacity optimization and transform the operations from commodity-focused to a better balance between the commodity and specialty operations, where we see unique market potential going forward for our Specialty Phosphate activities.


To expand our value-added specialty downstream activities.As part of our growth strategy we intend to further expand our specialty and value-added products organically and through selected synergy-driven acquisitions. This will allow us to create growth in our businesses and continue to evolve from a product-based to a market-focused organization.

In Specialty Fertilizers, the Company announced it is examining development of a potassium nitrate production plant with a capacity of about 200Kt to enable ICL to increase its production of soluble fertilizers. In addition, we developed a unique coating technology that enables controlled release of nutrients in a more effective way.

In Food, we are continuing to expand our existing phosphate-based texture and stability solutions to Western and Emerging markets. In addition, we are constantly collaborating with our customers in order to develop new formulations. The next phase of our strategy is to leverage our expertise and technology in enhanced texture and stability solutions beyond additives based solely on phosphates, including through acquisitions, strategic partnerships and joint ventures.

In 2015, we set a key milestone in ICL’s Food strategy with the acquisition of Prolactal – a leading European producer of dairy proteins for the food and beverage industries. This acquisition has increased ICL’s ability to service its existing customers by offering them a broader selection of texture and stability ingredients, in order to better meet the growing consumer demand for food and beverages with higher protein levels. Our deep understanding of the interaction of phosphates with proteins enables us to develop new products that, in part, fulfil unmet needs of our customers in the beverage and dairy markets and to support formulation of meatless products that are experiencing strong growth trends for vegetarians as well as flexitarians.

Finally, in Engineered Materials, we intend to utilize our expertise and technology to develop bromine and phosphorous/phosphate-based solutions for industrial applications. Furthermore, as part of development of the phosphate-based salt activities, we are considering expanding the White Acid production facility.

To further develop and enhance our “One ICL” culture and empower our employees.In order to realize our strategy, we believe we must continue enabling our employees to thrive within our organization through implementation of our “One ICL” strategy.

As part of the “One ICL” culture, we are optimizing our internal processes in order to share best practices across our Company in order to ensure that we provide the best services in our end markets. In addition, we are strengthening our innovation platform and rewarding and empowering our employees.

In September 2016, we decided to discontinue the Harmonization project, following identification of substantial risks related to the system’s suitability, complexity, and readiness which significantly impacted its timeline and budget. We aim to achieve some of the Harmonization project’s expected objectives by upgrading ICL's large existing ERP systems according to the organization’s needs and managerial priorities. In addition, we are examining utilization of some of the project’s elements, while transitioning gradually to global processes. This will enable us to focus more of our resources and attention on our core business activities. 

The manner of implementation of the strategic plan and the expected timing thereof and its impact may be different, possibly even significantly different, than anticipated. It may be difficult to reduce costs due to various factors, including the situation prevailing in the market, competition, labor relations and strikes, regulation and the risk factors characterizing our activities.


Our History

ICL was established in 1968 as a government company in Israel and operate today as a limited liability company under the laws of Israel. In 1975, the shares of various developmentcertain companies (including, among others, ICL Dead Sea, the companies today consolidated ascompanies ICL Rotem, the bromine companies and Tami) were transferred to us.ICL. In 1992, following a decision byof the Israeli government to privatize our Company, IsraelICL, the State published its tender prospectus, 20% of the Company's shares were sold to the public and its shares were registered for trading on the Tel-AvivTel‑Aviv Stock Exchange. Prior to our public share issuance, a Special State Share in our Company and our main Israeli subsidiaries was issued to the State of Israel.Israel (for additional details regarding the terms of the Special State Share, see “Item 10 - Additional Information— B. Memorandum, Articles of Association and Special State Share”). In 1995, the State of Israel sold its controlling interest in usthe Company (representing approximately 24.9% of our shares) to Israel Corporation Ltd., a public traded Company on the TASE (ILCO), which was controlled at that time by the Eisenberg family. A majority of the ordinary shares held by the state of Israel were sold during the following years. In 2000, the State of Israel ceased to be a stakeholder in terms of holding any of our ordinary shares, in us, but it retained the Special State Share. In 1999, the Ofer Group acquired the Eisenberg family’s shares in Israel Corporation. In September 2014, we listed our shares on the New York Stock Exchange, and they are currently traded in Tel Aviv and in New York.

As of December 31, 2016,2018, Israel Corporation Ltd. holds approximately48.65% 45% of our outstanding ordinary shares and approximately46% 45.87% of the shareholders' voting rights.

The following is a list of significant acquisitions, divestitures and joint ventures that have contributed to the growth of our business over the last 5several years:

·In March 2018, the Company completed the sale transaction of the fire safety and oil additives businesses, for a total consideration of $1,010 million, of which $953 million is in cash and $57 million is in the form of a long-term loan to a subsidiary of the buyer.
·In 2017, the Company completed the sale of its holdings in IDE Technologies Ltd., constituting 50% of IDE’s share capital.
·In 2016, ICL completed the sale of Clearon (chlorine-based biocide activities in USA).

33

·
In 2015, ICL, together with YPC, completed the formation of YPH JV. YPH JV’s activities include operation of a phosphate rock mine and other phosphate operations. In January 2016, ICL completed the investment in 15% of the issued and outstanding share capital on a fully diluted basis of YTH.YTH (Chinese traded company which holds YPH JV together with ICL).

·In April 2015, AkzoNobel Industrial Chemicals and the Company signed an agreement for production of high-quality vacuum salt. The vacuum salt will be manufactured by the Company and will be sold by AkzoNobel by means of an “offtake” agreement for acquisition of the partnership’s products. Pursuant to the agreement, the Company will finance and construct two production facilities on its mining site in Suria, in Catalonia, Spain. Construction of the first facility was completed in 2016, and its test run period is to be completed in the second quarter of 2017. Construction of the second facility is expected to be completed in 2019;

·In 2015, weICL completed the acquisitiondivestiture of Prolactal, a leading European company that manufacturers milk proteinsthe following non‑core business activities: the alumina, paper and water industry (APW), the thermoplastic products for the footwear industry (Renoflex), the hygiene products for the food industry (Anti‑Germ) and beverage industry;the pharmaceutical and gypsum businesses (PCG).

For information about our principal capital expenditures and divestitures during the last three fiscal years, see “Item 5 - Operating and Financial Review and Prospects— B. Liquidity and Capital Resources— Principal Capital Expenditures and Divestitures”.
B. BUSINESS OVERVIEW
Company Overview
ICL is a global specialty minerals and chemicals company operating bromine, potash and phosphate mineral value chains in a unique, integrated business model. ICL extracts raw materials from well-positioned mineral assets and utilizes technology and industrial know-how to add value for customers in key agricultural and industrial markets worldwide. ICL focuses on strengthening leadership positions in all of its core value chains. It also expects to strengthen and diversify its offerings of innovative agro solutions by leveraging its existing capabilities and agronomic know-how, as well as the Israeli technological ecosystem. In August 2018, we commenced working under an aligned organizational structure according to which the Company's operations are divided into four segments: Industrial Products (Bromine), Potash, Phosphate Solutions and Innovative Ag Solutions. Comparative data has been restated to reflect the change in the structure of the reportable segments, as stated above.
Our principal assets include:
·In 2014, we concludedAccess to one of the acquisitionworld’s richest, longest‑life and lowest‑cost sources of 100% of Fosbrasil (increasing our holdings from 44.25% to 100%), the leading manufacturer in Latin America of purified phosphoric acid for the foodpotash and special fertilizer markets and a manufacturer of secondary products based on phosphates and special fertilizers;bromine (the Dead Sea).

·In 2014, we acquired AmegA Sciences, an innovative development company
Two potash mines and industrial leaderprocessing facilities in Spain. The Company is in the process of restructuring the operations in Spain from England of products for special agricultural markets, landscaping, grass, and convenience installations, including solutions related to water savings, water conservation, and growth enhancement;two sites into one site.

·Our acquisition of Hagesud Group, a German producer of premium spice blends
Bromine compounds processing facilities located in Israel, the Netherlands and food ingredients for meat processing, in 2014;China.

·A unique integrated phosphate value chain, from phosphate rock mines in Israel and in China to our value‑added downstream products in Israel, Europe, the United States, Brazil and China. Our acquisition in 2013 ofspecialty phosphates serve the assetsfood industry by providing texture and production operations of Knapsack, a factory in Germany used for marketingstability solutions to the meat, poultry, sea food, dairy and producing P2S5 phosphates;bakery markets and many industrial markets such as metal treatment, water treatment, oral care, carbonated drinks, asphalt modification, paints and coatings and more.

34


·Our acquisition of all of the shares of the Belgian company Nu3 NV and sale of all of our shares
Polysulphate resources in the Dutch company Nu3 BV, due to the liquidation of the Nu3 partnership, at the end of 2012;United Kingdom.

·Our acquisition in 2011Production of 50%tailor-made, highly-effective specialty fertilizers offering both improved value to the grower and precise nutrition which is essential for plant development, optimization of the shares of Tetrabrom Technologies Ltd., raising our shareholdings to 100% of the share capital of Tetrabrom;crop yields and reduced environmental impacts.

·Our acquisition in 2011A focused and highly experienced group of 100% ownership of A. Fuentes Mendea S.A., a Spanish company engaged in thetechnical experts developing production processes, new applications, formulations and marketing of specialty fertilizers in Spain;products for our agricultural and industrial markets.

·Our acquisitionAn extensive global logistics and distribution network with operations in 2011 of the companies, assets and certain activities in the specialty fertilizers area owned by the U.S. company, Scotts Miracle-Gro Company (subsequently renamed Everris);over 30 countries.

·Our acquisition of shares in Nutrisi Holdings in 2011, resulting in 100% ownership of Nutrisi Holdings, a Belgian holding company that owns 50% of Nu3, a manufacturer of soluble NPK fertilizer components;

Segment Information

We are a leading multinational company that operates mainly in

In the areas of fertilizers and specialty chemicals, through two segments – Essential Minerals Segment and Specialty Solutions Segment.


Essential Minerals

The Essential Minerals segment includes the ICL Potash & Magnesium, and ICL Phosphate business lines. The segment focuses on efficiency, process innovation and operational excellence, in order to improve the competitive position of its assets.

In 2016, theyear ended December 31, 2018, we generated total sales of the ICL Essential Minerals segment were $2,437$5,556 million, constituting 45% of ICL's total sales (including sales to the Specialty Solutions segment), while the operating income of ICL Essential Minerals totaled $343$1,519 million, constituting 37%adjusted operating income of $753 million, net income attributable to the shareholders of the company of $1,240 million and adjusted net income attributable to the shareholders of the company of $477 million. See "Item 5 – Operating and Financial Review and Prospects – A. Operating Results – Adjustments to reported operating and net income (Non-GAAP financial measures)".

Sales of the Industrial Products segment amounted to $1,296 million and the operating income attributable to the segments.

segment amounted to $350 million, sales of the Potash segment amounted to $1,623 million and the operating income attributable to the segment amounted to $393 million, sales of the Phosphate Solutions segment amounted to $2,099 million and the operating income attributable to the segment amounted to $208 million, and sales of the Innovative Ag Solutions segment amounted to $741 million and the operating income attributable to the segment amounted to $57 million.

For a breakdown of sales and a geographic market by segments for each of the last three fiscal years, see “Item 5 - Operating and Financial Review and Prospects— A. Operating Results”.
Our Industries
The majority of our businesses compete in the global fertilizer and specialty chemicals industries.
Fertilizers
Fertilizers serve an important role in global agriculture by providing vital nutrients that help increase both the yield and the quality of crops. Nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium (N, P and K) constitute the three major nutrients required for plant growth. ICL sells phosphorus‑based and potassium‑based products. There are currently no artificial substitutes for phosphoruspotassium and potassium (which are supplied by the Company). These threephosphorous. Although these nutrients are presentnaturally found in the ground, however the continued use of the soil, for agricultural crops depletes the concentration of these fundamental elements in the groundthey are depleted over time andby farming, which could result in a decline inlead to declining crop yields and therefore this deficiencyland productivity. To replenish these nutrients, farmers must be replenished from external sources through the use ofapply fertilizers. ICL sells phosphorus-based and potassium-based products.

Each of these three nutrients plays a different role in plant development. Potassium and phosphorus are vital for physiological processes of the plant, including strengthening cereal stalks, stimulating root development, leaf and fruit health, and accelerating the growth rate of crops. Without these nutrients, crops cannot achieve their growth potential. Potassium also enhances a plant’s ability to withstand drought and cold, improves the efficient use of nitrogen and other nutrients necessary for plant development, and improves the durability of agricultural produce in storage and transportation, thereby prolonging the shelf life of produce.

35

In the short term, demand for fertilizers is volatile and seasonal, and is affected by factors such as weather in the world’s key agricultural growing regions, fluctuations in planting main crops, agricultural input costs, agricultural product prices and developments in biotechnology. Some of these factors are influenced by subsidies and lines of credit granted to farmers or to producers of agriculture inputs in various countries, and by environmental regulations. In addition, currency exchange rates, legislation and international trade policies have an impact on the supply, demand and level of consumption of fertilizerfertilizers worldwide. In spite of the volatility that may be caused in the short term as a result of these factors, we believe that the policy of most countries is to ensure an orderly and high-qualityhigh‑quality supply of food to the population and to this end, to encourage agricultural production. Therefore, we expect the long-termlong‑term growth trend of the fertilizers market willto be maintained. Due to the existing entry barriers to entry and to the excess of supply over demand, in the long term we expect a reduction in the entry of new players into the market and the expansion of production capacity, until a new breakeven point between the supply and the demand is reached.

Potash helps regulate a plant’s physiological functions and improves plant resilience, providing crops with protection from drought, disease, parasites and cold weather. Unlike phosphate and nitrogen, potash does not require additional chemical conversion to be used as a nutrient fertilizer. Potash is mined either from underground mines or, less frequently, from solutions found in nature, such as the Company’s operations in the Dead Sea. According to estimates of the United States Geological Survey, nine countries account for approximately 94% of the world’s potash natural reserves and according to the Fertecon Potash Outlook December 2018 report, worldwide sales of potash in 2018 were higher than in 2017 due to increased demand, mainly in China and Brazil.
The entry barriers facing new competitors into the potash market are significant, and include a long period of time and an investment of billions of dollars of capital per operation. For example, economically recoverable potash deposits are scarce, typically deep in the earth and geographically concentrated. Nonetheless, several fertilizer companies are in the process of commissioning new potash mines.
Phosphate is essential for the development of the plant’s root, and is required for photosynthesis, seed germination and efficient usage of water. The main raw materials for phosphate fertilizers are phosphate rock and sulphuric acid, as well as ammonia. The principal phosphate fertilizer producing regions have plentiful reserves of high quality phosphate rock that can be mined at a low cost. In 2018, the vast majority of the world’s phosphate rock production was in China, Morocco, the United States and Russia. In the phosphate market, the need for access to competitive sources of multiple raw material feedstocks (phosphate rock, sulphuric acid and ammonia), combined with the complexity of developing an economically feasible downstream value chain, constitute a significant entry barrier with respect to new competitors.
The specialty fertilizers market is growing faster than the markets for conventional fertilizers. Specialty fertilizers are generally used for specialty crops (such as greenhouses and horticulture) but are also expanding into usage for larger specialty field crops. Farmers use fertilizers that are customized to meet the needs of specific crops, soil types and climates, to maximize yield and quality. The specialty fertilizers allow more precise application of the critical foundations for development of the plant (phosphorus acid, potassium and nitrogen) and micro‑nutrients. In addition to reduction of the environmental impacts, the specialty fertilizers contribute to a more efficient and effective fertilization of different types of agriculture products (fruits, vegetables, etc.). Increase in the demand for food is expected to give rise to an increase in the use of specialty fertilizers. These fertilizers include, among others, “enhanced efficiency fertilizers” which include controlled release fertilizers (CRF), which allow for precision in the release of nutrients over time, and delayed/slow release fertilizers (SRF), which allow for a very slow release of nutrients (nitrogen and potassium only), liquid fertilizers integrated in irrigation systems and in herbicides and fully water soluble fertilizers, which are most commonly used for fertilization by means of drip irrigation systems and foliar spraying.
36

FertilizerpluS is ICL's premium fertilizers line, based mainly on polyhalite (marketed by the Company as Polysulphate™) and other products. FertilizerpluS products, which include different compounds of phosphorus, sulphur, potassium, magnesium and calcium, are tailored for various types of soil and wide range of crops, intended to enhance crops, improve yields and increase fertilizer efficiency. FertilizerpluS includes, among others, the following products:
·Polysulphate™ – polyhalite is a mineral that is exclusively mined by ICL through the Potash segment in an underground mine in the UK and is marketed under the brand name Polysulphate™. Polysulphate™ is used in its natural form as a fully soluble and natural fertilizer, which is also used for organic agriculture and as a raw material for production of fertilizers. Polysulphate™ is composed of sulphur (SO3 48%), potash (K2O 14%), calcium (CaO 17%) and magnesium (MgO 6%), which are essential components for improvement of crops and agricultural products.
·PotashpluS – a compressed mixture of Polysulphate™ and potash. The product includes potassium, sulphur, calcium and magnesium.
·PKPlus – a unique combination of phosphate, potash and Polysulphate™.
·NovaPhos – ensures an effective supply of slow-release phosphorus, calcium, magnesium and micronutrients for crops, specifically tailored for use in acidic soil.
·NPS – a nitrogen-phosphate fertilizer compounded with sulphur, which provides exceptional effectiveness for the enhancement of a wide range of crops through the combination of these three nutrients in one product.
·PK+Micronutrients – a tailor-made fertilizer, with precise micronutrient composition for the specific type of crop.
PKPlus, NovaPhos, NPS and PK+Micronutrients are marketed by the Phosphate Solutions segment.

37

Specialty Chemicals Industries
Specialty phosphates - ICL’s specialty phosphates products are based on ICL's backward integrated value chain, which uses phosphate rock and fertilizer-grade phosphoric acid (“green phosphoric acid”), for the production of specialty phosphates products with higher added value, such as pure phosphoric acid and salts for various applications. These products provide ICL with additional value on top of commodity phosphates. One of the major applications for specialty phosphates provides solutions based on specialty phosphate salts and acids for the diversified industrial end markets, such as oral care, cleaning products, paints and coatings, water treatment, asphalt modification, construction and metal treatment. Another major application is for the food industry, as functional food ingredients and phosphate additives, which provide texture and stability solutions for the processed meat, poultry, seafood, dairy, beverage and baked goods markets. Demand for specialty phosphates is driven by global economic and population growth and improved living standards, which promote the adoption of more sophisticated food products as well as improved industrial products and production technologies.
Bromine is a member of the halogen family and known for its diverse uses in many industries. Based on a study conducted in 2014 at Vanderbilt University, among 92 naturally occurring chemical elements, bromine falls within a class of 28 chemical elements that are essential for human life. Bromine is used in the production of a range of bromine compounds.
The largest commercial use of bromine is in the area of bromine‑based flame retardants, which, based on ICL’s internal estimations, accounts for approximately 40% of the demand for bromine. In order to meet fire-safety requirements, flame retardants are used as inputs in manufacturing processes and end products, such as, plastic enclosures for consumer electronics, printed circuit boards, insulation materials for construction, furniture, automobiles, and textiles. Additional commercial uses of bromine are in the following industries: rubber production, oil and gas drilling, water purification, intermediate materials for production of medicines and pesticides, and others. ICL and its competitors focus on R&D to introduce new products and uses for bromine on an ongoing basis.
Bromine is found naturally in seawater, underground brine deposits and other water reservoirs, such as the Dead Sea. The concentration of bromine varies depending upon its source. The method for extracting bromine depends on the nature of its source and its concentration. The lower the concentration of bromine in the brines, the more difficult and expensive it is to extract. The Dead Sea is the world’s premier source of bromine, with concentration levels significantly higher than in regular seawater, and it accounts for about half of the global supply (together with the production on the Jordanian side of the Dead Sea). The Dead Sea operation is the most competitive supply source of bromine as it has the highest concentration, and as a result, the least amount of water must be extracted and evaporated to produce bromine, which minimizes the energy costs.
The bromine industry is highly concentrated, with three companies accounting for the majority of the worldwide capacity in 2018 (ICL, Albemarle and Lanxess). Lack of access to a low-cost source of supply, such as the Dead Sea, constitutes a significant barrier to entry for aspiring competitors, as well as the requirement for a logistical supply system and specialized transport containers (isotanks). The Company estimates that the majority of the global elemental bromine production is consumed internally by the bromine manufacturers, since there is a very small market for elemental bromine. Development of complex production facilities for downstream products is required in order to increase the global use of elemental bromine.
Magnesium is considered to be the lightest structural metal. One of the main characteristics of magnesium is a higher strength‑to‑weight ratio compared with other metals – mainly steel and aluminum. The magnesium market is characterized by concentration of production, where about 85% of the production is in China.There are a small number of western producers, including US Magnesium in the United States, ICL Magnesium in Israel and RIMA in Brazil.
38

Markets
ICL is built around three main minerals – potash, phosphate and bromine, which are the main raw materials for most of the downstream products along the integrated value chains that we have developed throughout the years. ICL is organized in four segments: Industrial Products, Potash, Phosphate Solutions and Innovative Ag Solutions (IAS). Three of the four segments represent a specific value chain: The Industrial Products segment includes mainly the bromine value chain (elemental bromine and bromine compounds for various industrial applications) as well as several complementary businesses, mainly phosphorous based compounds (mostly flame retardants) and additional Dead Sea minerals for the pharma, food, oil & gas and de-icing industries. The Potash segment is based on our potash value chain and includes mainly potash fertilizers, as well as polysulphate-based fertilizers for the agriculture market. The segments also includes the magnesium activity. The Phosphate Solutions segment is mostly based on ICL's phosphate value chain. It includes specialty phosphate salts and acids for various industrial applications as well as commodity phosphates, used mostly as fertilizers. In each of the segments ICL benefits from leadership position, whether it is in market share or in cost competitiveness. The fourth segment, IAS, currently includes the specialty fertilizers business line

but also functions as ICL's innovative arm, focusing on R&D and digital innovation. ICL aims to achieve leadership position in specialty fertilizers through portfolio enhancement and geographic expansion, potentially including bolt-on M&A.


39

Industrial Markets
ICL’s Industrial Products segment and ICL's specialty phosphates business serve various industrial markets, benefitting from its integrated phosphate and bromine value chains.
Industrial Products
ICL's bromine solutions are embedded in numerous products, making consumer goods safer and industrial production more efficient and sustainable. Demand for the products manufactured by ICL Industrial Products, which mainly include solutions based on bromine and phosphorus, is driven by population growth, increased standards of living, higher environmental awareness and increased focus on cost effective production. These trends drive demand for more environmentally friendly and safer industrial products, as well as efficient and reliable service suppliers. ICL’s products serve a diverse number of industries, such as, construction, electronics, automotive, energy (including renewable energy), water and pharma & nutraceutical. Increased regulation and environmental awareness also drive demand for flame retardants including polymeric and reactive flame retardants, bromine‑based biocides for water treatment, bromine, magnesia and potassium chloride‑based intermediates for the pharmaceutical industry and oil additive solutions. ICL estimates that bromine demand is relatively stable and market growth is linked to global population growth. On the supply side, Chinese supply is in a downward trend due to resource depletion and increased environmental-related regulatory pressure in China. This, together with shortage of economically viable bromine resources globally, result in a tight supply‑demand balance and price increases.
Specialty Phosphates
ICL’s specialty phosphates business is based on ICL's backward integration into phosphate rock and fertilizer grade phosphoric acid which is cleaned to reach purified phosphoric acid (also referred to as food grade or technical grade acid). ICL markets purified acids and also produces phosphate salts based on it. ICL's phosphoric acids and salts serve many industries such as cola beverages, water treatment, cleaning materials, paints and coatings, metal treatment, oral care, construction and more. Phosphate salts used as food additives serve the dairy, bakery, meat, poultry and seafood industries.
In March 2018, the Company completed the sale transaction of the fire safety and oil additives businesses, for a total consideration of $1,010 million, of which $953 million is in cash and $57 million is in the form of a long-term loan to a subsidiary of the buyer.
According to ICL's estimates, the Company has a leading position in specialty phosphates in Europe, North America and Latin America. According to CRU's estimates from September 2018, demand for purified phosphoric acid is expected to grow by a CAGR of 1.5% between 2018 to 2023 while supply is expected to grow by less than 0.5%. According to CRU, demand for water soluble fertilizers, of which purified phosphoric acid is a major raw material, has been growing sharply, driven by rapid growth in fruit & vegetable consumption and changing agricultural production systems. Phosphate salts used in processed meats, cheeses and baking goods, have seen strong consumption growth in developing countries. At the same time, there are several capacity expansions on the horizon, these are likely to be almost entirely offset by expected closures of TPA (thermal phosphoric acid) plants in China.
40

Consumer demand for different food products has changed dramatically over the last several decades, driven by increased income per capita, demographic shifts and lifestyle changes. Longer working hours, changing family structures, increased awareness of nutrition and health issues and access to a broader variety of food products result in growing demand for more sophisticated, protein-enriched, unprocessed (“clean label”) and non-allergenic (“free from”) food products with longer shelf lives along with improved flavor, texture and appearance. An increasingly longer supply chain and consumer awareness of food waste also drives the demand for longer shelf‑life and food stability. These trends act as long‑term drivers of demand for food additives, such as phosphate derivatives, phosphate and protein containing formulations and hygiene products for the processed meat, bakery, dairy and beverages industries.
Agriculture Markets
ICL's potash, commodity fertilizers, FertilizerpluS and specialty fertilizers businesses serve agriculture markets worldwide. Global fertilizer demand is driven mainly by the supply/demand balance in respect of grains and other agriculture products, which impacts their prices. Supply of agriculture products is influenced by weather, planted areas and input usage, while demand is primarily influenced by population growth and dietary changes in the developing world:
Population and Income Growth per Capita. Historically, growth in fertilizer consumption globally has been closely correlated with growth in the world’s population, which is expected to increase by over 2.0 billion and to reach 9.8 billion by 2050, according to the FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the UN). Currently, developed countries use fertilizers more intensively than developing countries and, therefore, produce crops at much higher yields. Economic growth in emerging markets supports food demand and thus fertilizer use. In addition, growth in income per capita in developing markets results in a shift to more protein‑rich diets through higher meat consumption, which requires larger quantities of grain for their growth, thus leading to an increased demand for seeds used in animal feed. According to estimates published by the IMF (International Monetary Fund), GDP per capita in emerging markets and developing economies is expected to grow by 3.3% and 6.5% in 2019 and 2020, respectively.
Declining Arable Land per Capita.  As the world’s population grows, mainly in cities, farmland per capita decreases and more food production is required from each acre of farmland. This, in turn, requires increased yield per planted area. According to the FAO, the amount of arable land per capita is expected to decrease from 0.22 hectares per person to 0.17 hectares per person between 2014 and 2050. Effectively, new arable land is available only in limited quantities, and is concentrated mainly in Brazil. Therefore, the only viable path to increase crop production is through a yield increase in existing farms in developing countries, mainly in China, India, Russia, Africa and Central America, by optimizing the use of fertilizers (especially improving the balance in the use of potash, which is underutilized versus the use of nitrogen fertilizers), together with water availability and better seeds. According to the FAO, world crop production will double between 2007 and 2050. 77% of the growth is expected to be attributed to increase in yields.

41

Grain Stock‑to‑Use Ratio. As illustrated by the chart below, starting from the year 2000 and until the 2012/3 agriculture season, pressure on food demand and unfavorable weather in the main growing areas resulted in low levels of the grain stock‑to‑use ratio (a metric index of the level of carryover stock). Since then, several years of favorable weather led to a trend of increasing yields, resulting in an increase in the grain stock-to-use ratio. An increase in the grain stock-to-use ratio generally indicates that grain prices may decline (due to higher grain supply) and vice versa. During 2018, corn and wheat prices increased by 8.4% and 19.3%, respectively, while soybean and rice prices decreased by 4.8% and 9.9%, respectively. WASDE report published by the USDA in February 2019 showed a decrease in the expected ratio of the global inventories of grains to annual consumption, to 29.2% at the end of the 2018/19 agriculture year, compared to 31.3% at the 2017/18 agriculture year, and 30.6% in the 2016/17 agriculture year. The decrease in the global stock-to-use ratio is mainly a result of a decrease in the ratio for wheat and corn compared to the previous agricultural year, due to a decrease in wheat production in Australia which is facing a drought and in Argentina due to a smaller crop on the background of an increased consumption and due to higher consumption of corn.
Specialty Agriculture
Specialty Agriculture markets are estimated to be growing at a rate of 5-15% a year, depending on the market segment (IFA, 2017). The decrease in arable land per capita due to population growth and the increasing pursuit of an improved quality of life are leading to a higher consumption of fruits and vegetables, which are considered specialty crops, and support the use of more sophisticated fertilizers that will enable higher yields. Increased environmental awareness is also contributing to the use of specialty fertilizers (since they result in higher nutrient efficiency).

42

The expected market growth is supported by the following global trends:
The need for an increase in yield and crop quality
Enhanced Efficient Fertilizers, which include controlled release fertilizers (CRF), increase the quality and yield of crops through a more efficient crop uptake of the nutrients. Many specialty-fertilizers field trials in specific growing regions have already demonstrated the benefits of using new fertilizer technologies. The Enhanced Efficiency Fertilizers category is rapidly growing globally.
Regulatory pressure and environmental trends
Environmental regulations impose restrictions on the level of nutrient usage. This results in a movement towards more efficient nutrient solutions, such as Controlled Release Fertilizers (CRFs) or Water Soluble Fertilizers.
China’s Zero Growth Fertilizers 2020 is one example of such a regulation. In order to achieve the goal of a zero increase in fertilizer consumption by 2020, China is promoting new fertilization technologies including Controlled Release Fertilizers and fertigation; raising customized fertilizer application; promoting new fertilizers and new technologies; promoting organic fertilizer application and strengthening of high-standard ploughing (Agronews, 2015). CRFs are representative of new fertilizers, so hastening their adoption will play a pivotal role in reducing the consumption volume of chemical fertilizers and improving their utilization rates (CCM, Data & Business Intelligence, 2016). Another example is the EU Nitrate Directive, which sets a limit to the amount of nitrates in the water. Specialty Fertilizers, such as CRFs, can optimize the availability of nitrogen to the crop. (EU Nitrate Directive, European Commission, 2014). In recent years, there has been a growing trend among commercial companies, such as supermarket chains and other retailers, of setting their own internal rules related to growers’ practices. For instance, some supermarket chains are demonstrating their commitment to reduce environmental impacts by setting specific rules regarding fertilizer usage by their fruits and vegetables suppliers. Other voluntary organizations, such as “GAP - Good Agriculture Practice”, publish guidelines and issue certificates to farmers who comply with their regulations. Many food processing companies and retailers adopt these guidelines as a standard their suppliers should comply with.
New Grower Practices
Grower practices have a substantial impact on the growth of the Specialty Fertilizers market. Fertigation usage is growing since applying fertilizers via fertigation systems is much more efficient when using specialty fertilizers, thus increasing the demand for soluble fertilizers such as Water Soluble NPKs.
The ongoing improvements in agricultural technology have resulted in a significant increase in the usage of drip irrigation (more than 10% per year) and an increase in demand for liquid and water soluble fertilizers.
All of the above are expected to contribute to a higher long-term demand for specialty fertilizer solutions.

43

Our Competitive Strengths
ICL attributes its business strength to the following competitive advantages:
·
Unique portfolio of mineral assets. ICL benefits from access to one of the world’s richest, longest‑life and lowest‑cost resources of potash and bromine. ICL’s access to these resources is based on an exclusive concession from the State of Israel for extraction of minerals from the Dead Sea. ICL also holds licenses to mine potash and salts from underground mines in Spain, with vast resources. ICL is the only global producer of polyhalite, a mineral used as fertilizer and consisting potassium, Sulphur, calcium and magnesium. In addition, ICL has access to phosphate rock in the Negev Desert based on mining licenses from the State of Israel and it holds a license for mining phosphates in China. Access to these assets provides ICL with a consistent, reliable supply of raw materials, allowing for large scale-production and supporting ICL’s integrated value chain of specialty, value added products.
Dead Sea in Israel:  ICL’s potash and bromine production facilities at the Dead Sea enjoy lower production costs compared to mining potash from underground deposits or extracting bromine from less concentrated sources. This is attributed to the high concentration and virtually unlimited supply of minerals in the Dead Sea and to the unique solar evaporation production process which is less energy intensive. Furthermore, the Dead Sea’s hot and dry climate allows ICL to store outdoors very large amounts of potash (exceeding annual production) at a low cost. This advantage enables ICL to operate its potash facilities at full production capacity despite periodic fluctuations in demand, and to react faster in periods of higher demand. In addition, ICL benefits from lower transportation and logistics costs compared to its competitors and faster time to market due to the geographic proximity of its facilities in Israel to seaports and due to Israel’s geographic positioning vis‑à‑vis its main geographical markets (especially the fast‑growing markets of India, China and Brazil). While ICL benefits from these advantages, it incurs infrastructure‑related costs in connection with harvesting salt from Pond 5 at its Dead Sea complex, which is its central evaporation pond, to avoid the need to continue to raise the water level in the pond. In addition, while the supply in the Dead Sea is virtually unlimited, ICL’s access to this supply of potash and bromine pursuant to the concession is subject to the need to construct a new pumping station (P-9). Moreover, the Law for Taxation of Profits from Natural Resources in Israel which entered into effect on January 1, 2016, will impact the Company's net profit if the mineral's price environment will increase to a level that its effect on the profitability of the subsidiaries resulted to a natural resources tax liabilities. See “Item 3 - Key Information— D. Risk Factors— Risks Related to Our Business”.
United Kingdom and Spain mineral assets:  In addition to its operations in Israel, ICL mines potash in Spain and Polysulphate in the United Kingdom (potash production in the United Kingdom halted completely in mid-2018). The geographical proximity to Europe, the primary market of these assets, provides ICL with logistical advantages reflected in lower transportation costs, faster time-to‑market and higher net-back prices. In Spain, ICL is progressing with its project to consolidate the two existing mines and processing facilities into one complex which operates a ramp instead of a shaft, thus aiming to increase the mine’s capacity and contributing to lower costs. The project also consists of expanding the above-mentioned processing facility’s capacity, logistics adjustments and improvements and construction of a new terminal in the Port of Barcelona. In the UK, the Company is ramping up the production of Polysulphate,a unique mineral containing four nutrients (potassium, sulphur, calcium and magnesium) which can be used as a natural fertilizer and provides a very cost effective solution, as its production does not require chemical processing.
44

Integrated phosphate value chain: ICL’s access to phosphate rock in the Negev Desert and in China is the foundation for the Company's sizeable downstream, fully backward integrated specialty phosphate business. ICL mines and processes phosphate rock from three open‑pit mines in the Negev Desert under mining licenses from the State of Israel and from an open-pit mine in Haikou (China), using conventional methods, under a phosphate mining license that was issued in July 2015 by the Division of Land and Resources of the Yunnan district in China. About 90% of the phosphate rock produced is used internally to manufacture phosphate fertilizers, fertilizer-grade and pure phosphoric acid, with the balance being sold to third parties. ICL’s phosphate assets are the base for its vast and diversified specialty phosphates product portfolio used in industrial applications as well as food additives and specialty fertilizers, adding additional value to the commodity business while reducing ICL’s exposure to the volatility in the commodity markets. See “Item 3 - Key Information— D. Risk Factors— Our mining operations are dependent on concessions, licenses and permits granted to us by the respective governments in the countries wherein they are located”.
·
Diversification into higher value‑added specialty products leveraging ICL’s integrated business model. ICL’s integrated production processes are based on a synergistic value chain that allows it to both efficiently convert raw materials into value‑added downstream products and to utilize the by‑products. For example, in phosphates, ICL utilizes its backward integration to produce specialty phosphates used in the food industry and for industrial applications. These businesses benefit from higher growth rates, higher margins and lower volatility compared to commodity phosphates. In addition, as a by‑product of the potash production at the Dead Sea, ICL generates brines with the highest bromine concentration globally. ICL’s bromine‑based products serve various industries such as the electronics, construction, oil and gas and automotive industries.
·
Leading positions in markets with high entry barriers.  ICL obtains leadership positions in many of the key markets in which it operates. It is the clear leader in the bromine market, with 40% of market capacity and about third of production and in the potash market the Dead Sea operations has a leading competitive positions. ICL also has the largest market share in specialty phosphates in the combined markets of North America, Europe and Latin America and is the sole producer of polysulphate. ICL has leadership positions in additional product lines such as phosphorous-based flame retardants, PK fertilizers in Europe and soluble phosphate‑based fertilizers.
Most of ICL’s businesses rely on natural resources that are scarce and concentrated in the hands of a few market participants. ICL’s exclusive concessions, intellectual property (unique knowledge, technologies and patents for various products and applications), world‑wide marketing and distribution network and high industry start‑up costs for new market entrants add further significant barriers to entry.
45

·
Strategically located production and logistics assets.  ICL benefits from the proximity of its facilities, both in Israel and Europe, to developed economies (Western Europe) and emerging markets (such as China, India and Brazil). For example, in Israel, ICL ships from two seaports: The Port of Ashdod (with access to Europe and South America) and the Port of Eilat (with access to Asia, Africa and Oceania). As a result of their geographical positions, access to these two ports provides ICL with two distinctive advantages versus its competitors: (1) it has lower plant gate‑to‑port, ocean freight, and transportation costs from ports to target markets, which lower its overall cost structure; and (2) it has faster time to markets due to its proximity to end‑markets, allowing it to opportunistically fill short lead‑time orders, strengthening its position with its customers. In addition, ICL is the sole producer with the ability to transport potash and phosphates from the same port (which it does in Israel). ICL’s sales are balanced between emerging markets (approximately 39% of 2018 sales) and developed economies (approximately 61% of 2018 sales).
·
Available cash flows from operating activities and closely monitored capital allocation approach. Continuous focus on cash flow generation, optimization of the capital expenditures (CAPEX) and working capital as well as the implementation of efficiency measures enabled the Company to generate operating cash flow of $620 million in 2018. These cash flows were used in accordance with the Company’s strict approach in connection with allotment of equity, whereby the Company examines, on an ongoing basis, the work plan and its investments. ICL's capital allocation approach balances between driving its long‑term value creation through investments in its growth, providing a solid dividend yield while aiming to maintain an investment grade rating (BBB- by S&P and Fitch). On March 6, 2018, the Company’s Board of Directors revisited the dividend distribution policy and decided that for 2018 and 2019 calendar years the Company’s dividend payment rate will continue to be up to 50% of the adjusted net income. In 2018, the Company declared and paid total dividends of $244 million, in respect of the fourth quarter of 2017 as well as the first, second and third quarters of 2018. Dividend payments in 2018 reflects a dividend yield rate of 3.8% (based on the average share price for the year). See “Item 8 - Financial Information— A. Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information— Dividend policy”.
·
Professional expertise and culture of collaboration and determination. ICL’s operations are managed by an international management team with extensive industry experience. ICL develops leaders with strong experience in their fields in order to drive change and innovation within the Company. ICL focuses on nurturing and empowering talent through a global platform of qualification, collaboration and communication that reinforces innovation.

46

Our Strategy
ICL’s integrated business model is based on its unique access to essential minerals that support its specialty downstream activities – with the focus on crop nutrition and industrial markets. Our model creates significant operational synergies, which derive from the combination of our attractive assets and broad value‑added solutions. Over the years, we have developed a balanced portfolio that supports long‑term stability and growth.
In 2018 ICL launched its “Business Culture of Leadership” strategy, focused on enhancing market leadership across its three core mineral value chains of bromine, potash and phosphate, as well as realizing the growth potential of Innovative Ag Solutions. To better align the organization with this strategy, ICL Realigned the company into four business divisions: Industrial Products (bromine), Potash, extractsPhosphate Solutions and Innovative Ag Solutions.
Industrial Products
ICL’s global leadership in the bromine industry is driven by its focus on delivering value to its customers rather than increasing volume. ICL is able to generate more value by leveraging its unique assets and know-how and by fostering innovation through the development of new applications, such as new bromine and phosphorus-based flame retardants, magnesia and salt products, as well as other solutions. ICL continues to leverage its unique logistical advantages and unparalleled experience related to the safety and environmental aspects of its bromine business.
Potash
ICL leverages its well-positioned and unique potash assets, as well as its logistical advantages, to be among the three most competitive suppliers in its key target markets, including Brazil, Europe, India, South-East Asia and China. ICL’s cost competitiveness is driven by its lower logistics costs due to its facilities’ proximity to ports and customers, as well as by continuous optimization of its potash production processes at ICL Dead Sea and ICL Iberia, reducing costs and efficiently utilizing its capacity potential. At ICL Boulby, the Company has shifted towards production of Polysulphate, becoming the first and sole supplier of this new and unique fertilizer. ICL also continues to enhance its competitive production of Magnesium and to optimize synergies with its potash operations at the Dead Sea.
Phosphate Solutions
ICL is a global leader in providing phosphate based solutions to the Industrial, Food and Agriculture end markets. ICL’s strategy is to continue to outgrow these markets by increasingly focusing on specialty phosphate solutions and further promoting commercial excellence and value-based product positioning, while enhancing customer relationships. Leveraging on its backward integration to the phosphate resources of ICL Rotem in Israel and YPH in China, ICL will continue optimizing its capabilities to support growth and margin expansion of its specialty phosphate products and solutions.

47

Innovative Ag Solutions
ICL is striving to create global leadership for Innovative Ag solutions by enhancing its global positions in its core markets of Specialty Agriculture, Ornamental Horticulture, Turf and Landscaping, targeting high growth markets such as Latin America, India and China. By leveraging its unique R&D capabilities, as well as seeking M&A opportunities, ICL is working to expand its broad product portfolio of Controlled Release Fertilizers (CRF), Water Soluble Fertilizers (WSF), Liquid Fertilizers, Slow Release Fertilizers (SRF) and Straights (MAP/MKP/Pekacid), to further boost growth. ICL is also developing a service portfolio focused on creating global and regional Agro-professional based solutions, leveraging digital innovation.
Culture 
ICL fosters a “Business Culture of Leadership”, which focuses on business leadership, by creating a leading and sustainable work environment, with strong commitment to all stakeholders. Culture at ICL, means placing safety as the company’s top priority and making every effort and investment to achieve top safety results. Culture at ICL, also means operating with a clear commitment to the environment, even beyond regulatory compliance. ICL strives to be an “employer of choice” by strengthening the company’s value proposition to employees and by promoting ICL’s core values. ICL also fosters an innovation-driven culture that leverages its technology and know-how, to better serve its customers and increase their loyalty. To ensure we live up to our values, culture at ICL also means accountability, transparency and top-tier corporate governance.
Capital Structure
ICL’s growth initiatives will be supported by our strong financial position. ICL has taken several steps to solidify its capital structure and generate funds for future growth, by reducing debt and improving the maturity profile, optimizing capital expenditures and working capital, implementing cost reductions and divesting low‑synergy assets.
As part of this strategy, in March 2018, the Company completed the sale transaction of the Fire Safety and Oil Additives businesses, for a total consideration of $1,010 million, of which $953 million is in cash and $57 million is in the form of a long-term loan to a subsidiary of the buyer.
48

Segment Information
We are a leading multinational company that operates mainly in the areas of fertilizers and specialty chemicals, through four segments – Industrial Products, Potash, Phosphate Solutions and Innovative Ag Solutions.
Industrial Products Segment
The Industrial Products segment produces bromine out of a solution that is a by‑product of the potash production process in Sodom, Israel, as well as bromine‑based compounds. Industrial Products uses most of the bromine it produces for self‑production of bromine compounds at its production sites in Israel, the Netherlands and China. In addition, the Industrial Products segment produces several grades of potash, salt, magnesium chloride and magnesia products. Industrial Products is also engaged in the production and marketing of phosphorous-based flame retardants and additional phosphorus‑based products.
In 2018, the total sales of the Industrial Products segment totaled $1,296 million, constituting approximately 23% of ICL’s total sales (including sales to other segments), an increase of 9% compared to 2017 Sales. The segment operating profit totaled $350 million, constituting 35% of the total operating profit attributable to the segments. For additional information see “Item 5 - Operating and Financial Review and Prospects— A. Operating Results— Results of Operations”.
Products
Industrial Products focuses on three main sub-business lines:
Flame retardants – bromine, phosphorus and magnesium-based flame retardants are used in electronics, building and construction, automotive, textile and furnishing applications. Flame retardants are added to plastics, textiles and other combustible materials to inhibit or delay fire or flames and to prevent the spread of fire.
49

Industrial solutions – elemental bromine has a range of uses in the chemical industry, while bromine and phosphorous compounds are used in a number of industries worldwide, such as: rubber, pharmaceuticals, electricity, agro and polyester (in production of plastic fabrics and bottles). Clear brine fluids are used for balancing pressure in the oil and gas drilling industry. In addition, this sub-business line includes bromine‑based biocides used for treating industrial water.
Specialty minerals – specialty minerals include magnesia and salt products. The main applications of magnesia products are food and pharma, oil and fuel additives, catalysts and many other small applications. The salts include sodium chloride, magnesium chloride and KCl which are mainly used for the food industry, deicing (MgCl2) and various industrial applications. Due to the uniqueness and high quality/purity of our products, most of our sales are to niche markets.
The following table sets forth the principal products of the Industrial Products segment, as well as their primary applications and end‑markets:
Sub-business lineProductPrimary ApplicationsPrimary End‑Markets
Flame retardantsBromine-, Phosphorus- and magnesium Based Flame Retardants
Additives used in plastic, building materials and textile production
Electronics, automotive, building and construction, furniture and textiles
Industrial solutionsElemental BromineChemical reagent
Tire manufacturing, pharmaceuticals and agro
Phosphorus-Based Industrial Compounds
Fire resistant fluids in turbines & power generation hydraulic systems and phosphorous-based inorganic intermediates
Power plants and agro
Organic Bromine CompoundsInsecticides, solvents for chemical synthesis and chemical intermediates
Pharmaceuticals and agro
Clear BrinesOil and gas drillings
Oil and gas
MerquelMercury emission control
Emission control in coal‑fired power plants
Bromine‑Based Biocides
Water treatment and disinfection
Swimming pools, cooling towers, paper plants and oil and gas drillings
Specialty mineralsMagnesia ProductsPharma and food, transformer steel, catalysts fuel and oil additives.
Food additives, multivitamins, transformer steel, automotive rubber and plastic, health care
Solid MgCl2, KCl
Deicing, food, oil drilling, pharmaDeicing, sodium replacement, KCl for drugs. multivitamins, oil drilling companies, small industrial niche markets
Industrial Products also develops innovative products and new applications for existing products. The new products introduced in recent years include, among others FR122P flame retardant (a polymeric bromine‑based flame retardant used in insulation material in the construction industry), TexFRon® 4002 (a polymeric flame retardant product for textiles), bromine compounds for energy storage (a wide range of products use in bromine-based flow batteries), VeriQuel™R100 (a phosphorus-based reactive flame retardant for rigid polyisocyanurate and polyurethane spray foam) and PolyQuel® P100 (polymeric phosphorous flame retardant for high end epoxy printed circuit boards).
50

FR-122P Flame Retardant: Industrial Products has successfully introduced FR-122P as a sustainable polymeric flame retardant alternative to HBCD (hexabromocyclododecane) in the EU and Americas for expanded (EPS) and extruded (XPS) polystyrene foams used as insulation materials in the construction industry. Industrial Products is now focused on providing the same value chain support for the upcoming ban of HBCD in China expected in December 2021. For additional information, see “Item 4 - Information on the Company— B. Business Overview— Regulatory and Environmental, Health and Safety Matters - Limitations on the use of flame retardants and other products”.
TexFRon® flame retardant products for textiles:  In 2015, ICL began selling TexFRon® 4002, a polymeric flame retardant product for textiles developed as part of the R&D activities of the Industrial Products segment. TexFRon® 4002, which is designed to provide high‑level fire retardant solutions for textile and adhesive products, is an effective substitute for DECA, which the Company discontinued the production and marketing thereof, following a regulation prohibiting its use, which is expected to take effect in Europe in 2019. In December 2014, the TexFRon® 4002 polymeric product was recognized by Oekotex, a European standard for textile products. This product is the first bromine-based flame retardant that has received such recognition.
Energy storage: Bromine-based flow batteries are highly effective for storing large amounts of energy and offer important advantages compared to alternatives. ICL provides a high‑purity, tailor-made electrolyte solution together with a recycling process to assure that this technology is fully sustainable (in its post-use phase as well). Bromine-based flow batteries can be produced at lower cost, last longer and have greater capacity. ICL’s energy storage products were developed in order to address the developing needs deriving from the increased use of renewable energy. ICL supports technology developers with its world class experts and advanced laboratories, and its bromine-based energy storage technology provides environmental benefits.
VeriQuel™ R100 - Reactive flame retardant alternative to a legacy additive flame retardant (TCPP) in rigid polyurethane insulation applications.  VeriQuel™ R100 provides a timely drop-in replacement for TCPP due to the increased regulatory pressure against TCPP for its reported ubiquity in living environments. The strength of VeriQuel™ R100 is that it is reactive and thus helps avoid leaching or migration from the polymer into living environments as is reported with TCPP.  
PolyQuel® P100 - ICL has recently launched a new proprietary flame retardant PolyQuel® P100 targeting the high end printed circuit board market. PolyQuel® P100 offers a high performance solution for printed circuit boards. Being an active ester curing agent, this polymeric, non-halogen flame retardant provides higher flame-retardant efficiency, and lower dielectric values than other commercial phosphorus-based flame retardants. With this unique performance PolyQuel® P100 can be a high end solution for the telecommunication, server and transportation growing markets. This product was developed independently by ICL and is manufactured solely by ICL.
51


Production
The Industrial Products segment's major manufacturing facilities are located in Israel (production of bromine, bromine compounds, magnesia and salts products), the Netherlands (bromine compounds), Germany (phosphorus compounds), France (magnesia and calcium carbonate based products), the United States (phosphorus compounds) and China (bromine compounds).
The Industrial Products segment's principal manufacturing plants and marketing companies are set forth in the map below:
In 2018, ICL produced approximately 175 thousand tonnes of elemental bromine out of potential annual maximum production capacity of approximately 280 thousand tonnes. Approximately 75% of the elemental bromine produced is used internally for the production of bromine compounds.
In January 2018, a Central Control Room (CCR) was launched in Neot Hovav site. The CCR aligns Neot Hovav site with the industry's best practices in a way that supports information flow and allows remote control over the entire site. The new approach is based on centralized operational management which brings opportunities for innovation, economic of scale, benefits of safety, emergency response and management.
Competition
ICL Industrial Products is the world's largest manufacturer of elemental bromine. Based on internal estimates, ICL and its two main competitors, Albemarle and Lanxess, accounted for the majority of the worldwide production of bromine in 2018. Chinese and Indian production accounted for most of the remainder of the global production from various different sources, including, from brine produced from wells, seawater and desalinization plants. In recent years, Chinese authorities have been gearing-up their enforcement of regulations regarding safety and ecology in the local bromine industry. During 2017-2018, the MEP (Ministry of Environmental Protection) performed inspections in the province of Shandong (main Bromine production area in China). As a result of the inspections, producers are required to execute large investments in order to meet the ecological requirements. Due to these regulations, favorable conditions were developed in the Chinese bromine and bromine compounds market.
52

Lanxess and Albemarle produce bromine primarily from underground brine sources in the United States. Albemarle also has a joint venture with a Jordanian company for the production of bromine and bromine compounds which is located on the Jordanian side of the Dead Sea sharing the same source of raw materials with ICL. Lanxess purchases bromine and some other bromine compounds from the Industrial Products segment under a long‑term contract.
The main barrier to entry into the bromine and bromine compound market is access to an economically viable source of bromine having a sufficiently high concentration. In addition, the bromine business requires a complex logistics system based on special containers (isotanks) for transporting the bromine. The need for the logistics system is a barrier to entry of competitors into the global bromine trade.
The Dead Sea operations offer the world’s highest bromine concentration. As a result, the segment's relatively low production cost of elemental bromine gives it a competitive advantage. An additional competitive advantage derives from ICL’s isotanks fleet, which is the largest in the world. In addition, the segment has a widespread worldwide marketing, sales and supply chain network and a range of high‑quality products, combined with a technical support system that works closely with customers, providing a good competitive position in its target markets. In China, for example, the segment's network includes three production facilities, a sales network and technical support. In the Netherlands, the segment has a bromine compound production facility, which gives it a competitive advantage over materials imported into Europe. The phosphorous‑based flame retardant and functional fluids production plants in the United States and Europe are situated in close proximity to the Industrial Products’ principal customers.
In the phosphorous‑based flame retardants market, competition is mainly from Chinese manufacturers operating in the local market and in markets outside China, mainly Europe and the United States. The Chinese manufacturers have access to a source of high‑quality, low‑cost phosphorus, which improves their capacity to compete in this market.
There are many competitors in the biocides market for water treatment. The major barrier to entry into the market is related to the process of obtaining approval from the regulatory authorities to supply the biocide. During 2015, a new regulation (BPR Art. 95) entered into effect in Europe permitting only holders of the biocide approvals to sell. This acted to remove Chinese producers from supplying directly to the market. ICL is a registered and approved biocide producer.
In the magnesia field, as well as in fields of the solid MgCl2, packed KCl and salts, there are many competitors that have a cost advantage compared to us, which forces us to look for niche markets where our uniqueness and our high quality products are important.   
53

Raw Materials and Suppliers
The principal raw materials used by the Industrial Products segment for manufacture of the end products are bromine, chlorine, phosphorus and magnesia. The production process also uses significant amounts of water and energy. The Company produces a significant portion of its raw materials through the Dead Sea minerals extraction operations. For further information on the extraction operations, see “Item 4 - Information on the Company— D. Property, Plant and Equipment— Mineral Extraction and Mining Operations”.
Bromine is produced from the end brines (salt solutions) that are a by‑product of the process of production of potash from carnallite. The brine is pumped into ICL Industrial Products’ plant in Sodom, where bromine is produced in an oxidation process using chlorine.
Chlorine is produced by electrolysis of sodium chloride and as a by‑product of the metal magnesium production process of Dead Sea Magnesium Ltd. (“Dead Sea Magnesium”). The electrolysis facility and the magnesium plant are located next to the bromine facility in Sodom. The sodium chloride used in the electrolysis process is also a by‑product of the potash production in Sodom.
Industrial Products’ uses elemental bromine to manufacture bromine compounds at its facilities in Israel, the Netherlands, and China. The rest of the bromine is sold to third parties. Most bromine compounds are manufactured by a chemical process involving bromine together with a range of other raw materials, of which the largest are Bisphenol A, which is used to manufacture the bromine‑based flame retardant TBBA. Furthermore, the Industrial Products segment purchases many other raw materials that are required for production of its various products.
The following is a graphic representation of the production process.
Elemental phosphorus (P4) is produced in a roasting process from ores originating in Central Asia (Kazakhstan), the United States and China. The Industrial Products segment uses elemental phosphorus to produce phosphorus compounds at its factories (mainly phosphorous-based flame retardants). The basic phosphorus compound, POCl3, is manufactured in a chemical process that combines phosphorus, chlorine and oxygen. The reaction of this compound with a variety of other raw materials (such as propylene oxide) creates the commercial phosphorus compounds.
54

Following is a graphic representation of the production process:
Industrial Products uses magnesium chloride to manufacture magnesia products and MgCl2 flakes and pellets at its facilities in Israel. In addition, The Industrial Products segment uses KCl from the Potash segment to manufacture pure and industrial grades of KCl.
Following is a graphic representation of the production process:
Industrial Products maintains raw‑material inventories in quantities that take into account the projected level of production based on consumption, supply dates, distance from the supplier, and other operational and logistical considerations.
55


Sales, Marketing and Distribution
Industrial Products’ principal markets are the United States, western Europe, China, Japan, and Taiwan. Industrial Products sells its products primarily through a network of marketing companies, while a smaller part of sales is conducted through agents and distributors throughout the world. Commissions are paid to agents as is customary in the sector. Most of the sales are not executed under long‑term contracts or orders, but rather via current orders close to the date of supply. Nevertheless, the Industrial Products segment has several longer-term contracts (a year or more) and working to achieve additional long-term agreements.
Industrial Products’ policy is to maintain adequate inventory, which varies from product to product, in order to ensure orderly supply to customers in light of the customers’ distance from production centers and their demand for inventory availability, while optimizing the inventory storage costs. Therefore, portions of finished product inventories are held in storage facilities in the destination countries.
Industrial Products extends credit terms to its customers according to its credit policy. Sales are generally covered by trade credit risk insurance or by letters of credit from banks with high credit ratings.
Seasonality
Industrial Products’ operations are not characterized by seasonal fluctuations. However, sales of some of its products fluctuate between the various seasons. Agricultural products are characterized by relatively high sales in the second and third quarters. Biocides for swimming pools are characterized by relatively lower sales in the fourth quarter. MgCl2 for de‑icing are characterized by relatively higher sales in the first and fourth quarters. The aggregate impact of these diverse seasonal differences on the Industrial Products segment is not significant.
Natural Resources Tax
The Law for Taxation of Profits from Natural Resources entered into effect on January 1, 2016. For additional information, see Note 17 to our Audited Financial Statements.
56

Potash Segment
The Potash segment uses an evaporation process to extract potash from the Dead Sea and mines and producesuses conventional mining to produce potash and salt from subterranean minesan underground mine in Spain and the UK. ICL Potash processes theSpain. The segment markets its potash into its types and markets itfertilizers globally and also carries on certain other intercompany operations not solely related to the potash activities.

At the end of the second quarter of 2018, the Company ceased the production of potash in the ICL Boulby mine in the UK and shifted to sole production of Polysulphate™. The Polysulphate™ is produced in an underground mine at ICL Boulby in the UK, and is the basis for a significant part of the Company's FertilizerpluS product line. The segment also includes magnesium activities under which it produces, markets and sells pure magnesium and magnesium alloys, and also produces related by-products, including chlorine and sylvinite. In 2016,addition, the Potash segment sells salt that produced in its underground mines in Spain and UK.

In 2018, the total sales of ICLthe Potash segment were $1,285$1,623 million, and accounted for 53%constituting 29% of ICL's total sales (including sales to other segments), while the operating income of the sales offsegment totaled $393 million, constituting 39% of the Essential Minerals segment. The sales of ICL Potash in 2016 decreased by $164 million or 11% comparedoperating income attributable to 2015.the segments. For additional information, see “Item 5.A-5 - Operating Results”and Financial Review and Prospects— A. Operating Results— Results of Operations”.

Potash
Products

Potash is the common name for potassium chloride, which is the most common source of potassium for plants, one of the three essential nutrients for plant development, which assists in protection of the plants from diseases and damaging agents, helps them to adapt to the different weather conditions, regulates the water level in the plant, strengthens the plant stems and strengthens the plant's ability to absorb nourishing substances.

ICL sells potash for direct application as a fertilizer and to compound fertilizer manufacturers.

ICL

Potash produces potashis produced from the Dead Sea and from subterraneanunderground mines in Spain and the United Kingdom.Spain. The potash production process in Israel is based on extracting carnallite in a chemical process.carnallite. The carnallite, which is a compound of potassium chloride and magnesium chloride mixed with table salt, precipitates in some of the largest solar evaporation ponds in the world, which contain brines drawn from the Dead Sea. The carnallite containing salt is transferred to the plants where a chemical and physical process breaks down the carnallite crystal into potash using two distinct parallel technologies, (“hot”cold crystallization and “cold” crystallization).

Extraction of potash from underground mineshot leach. Potash production in Spain and the United Kingdom is carried out by miningin underground mines extracting sylvinite, (aa mixture of potash (KCl) and salt (NaCl) with varying potash concentrations)concentrations. The potash is separated from the salt by a flotation process in the production plants situated near the mines.


57

Production

ICL Potash’s

The principal production facilities of the Potash business include its plants in Israel Spain, and the United Kingdom.

ICL Potash’sSpain.

The manufacturing plants, distribution centers and marketing companies of the Potash business are set forth in the map below:


*The currentfacilities in ICL Boulby were used for potash, in addition to Polysulphate, until the end of the second quarter of 2018. For more information, see "United Kingdom" below.
In 2018, the Potash business produced approximately 4.9 million tonnes of potash and reached an annual production record level of approximately 3.8 million tonnes in Israel which derived mainly from efficiency activity in planning, maintenance and operational excellence.
The potential annual production capacity of the potash production facilities is approximately 6about 5 million tonnes. The potential production capacity of our various plants is based on the hourly output of the plants, multiplied by potential hours of operation per year. This calculation assumes continuous production over the year, 24 hours a day, with the exception of a few days for planned maintenance and renovations. Actual production is usually lower than the potential production capacity due to unexpected breakdowns, special maintenance operations, non-availabilitynon‑availability of raw materials and market conditions.

In light of the present market conditions, ICL

The Potash business is focusing on improving the efficiency of its operations and streamlining its cost structure in order to improve its competitive position in the market.

During 2016,market and to develop new, specialized products based on the Company decided to acceleratemain raw materials of the transition from extractingsegment by utilizing the existing production facilities and producing potash to producing polysulphate at its ICL UK mine. ICL will act to expandsales and logistics array. Under this framework, the polysulphate market by means of, among other things, development of a wide range of innovative polysulphate products. following actions were taken:

58

Israel
During the acceleratedthird quarter of 2018, the new power plant in Sodom, Israel became operational. The power plant is expected to reduce energy costs and support production period of polysulphate, miningICL's plants in Israel. The power plant produces steam that satisfies the Sodom site consumption and sells surplus electricity to other ICL companies and external customers. In 2018, the power plant contributed to ICL an operating income of the economically viable potash reserves will continue until they are fully depleted, albeit at a slower rate than in 2015 and 2016. In 2017, the Company is planning to produce about 450 thousand tonnes of polysulphate and to increase the production up to about 1 million tonnes in 2019. As part of these processes, the Company has completed implementation of the efficiency plan, whereby during 2016 reduction of the work force by about 470 positions was completed.

$10 million. For additional information, see “Item 4 – Mineral Extraction and Mining Operations – United Kingdom”, and “Reserves – United Kingdom.”

ICL Potash completed a plan in 2015 for an increase of approximately 500 thousand tonnes per year in potash production capacity at the Sodom facilities. This investment has


effectively created surplus production capacity at our production plants in relation to the production capacity of raw materials at our evaporation ponds, thereby adding flexibilityNote 20 to our production process and optimizing the timing of production and sales over time and already at the present time it permits production of the material that was accumulated in the ponds during the strike that took place in 2015. As a result, it is expected that the production of ICL Dead Sea will be 3.8 million tonnes in 2017.

Audited Financial Statements.

Spain
In 2011, ICL’s Board of Directors approved the restructuring of ICL Iberia’s operations from two sites to one site, as part of an efficiency plan.plan, while maintaining the current level of production. According to this plan, production at the Suria site in Spain, which includes a mine and a plant, will be expanded gradually, andwhereas the mining and production activities at the second site (Sallent) will be discontinued. In the first stage
As part of the above-mentioned plan, ICLthe Company is building an access tunnel to the Cabanasses mine and is(Suria), expanding the potash production capacity and compaction capacity. At the present time, theof potash, and constructed a plant for production of vacuum salt. The Company is examining alternatives for increasing the potash production capacity on the Suria site and at ICL Iberia to about 1.3 million tonnes, while achieving additional efficiency with respect to the production costs. At the end of 2016, the compacting and flotation plants were activated, and construction of the vacuum salt plant was finished and is expected to start operation by the first half of 2017, whereas the part of the access tunnel to the mine, which is aimed to significantly improve the capacity and production costs, is expected to be completed in the next three years.

It is anticipatedestimates that implementation of the first stage of the planthese actions will reduce expenses and contribute to streamlining, which will reduce potash production costs and contribute to conformityalignment of the production activities with the environmental standards.

The first stage includes establishing a production plant for

At the end of 2016, the compaction and flotation plants were operated. Towards the third quarter of 2018 the commissioning of the vacuum salt (salt with high chemical purity) at Suria, having aplant was completed and the plant became operational. Construction of the new access tunnel to the mine, which is designed to significantly reduce production costs and improve production capacity at the Suria site in Spain, is progressing and the completion is expected to take place at the end of about 750 thousand tonnes. The Company plans2019, the operation is expected to reach,begin in the long run, a potential production capacityfirst quarter of approximately 1.5 million tonnes of vacuum salt. High purity vacuum salt is used in a variety of applications by the chemicals industry, such as, by electrochemical companies and companies in the leather industry, as well as in the food and feed industries, and also for water treatment applications.

2020. 

In order to help implement these expansion plans in Spain, in April 2015, AkzoNobel (AkzoNobel Industrial Chemicals) and ICL Iberia signed an agreement for production and marketing of high quality vacuum salt. Thesalt and pure potash. High purity vacuum salt is used in a variety of applications in various industries, such as the: chemicals industry (for instance in electrochemical companies), the leather and textile industries, the food and feed industries, and water treatment applications.
All of the production willand pure potash marketing was planned to be performed by ICL whileand the vacuum salt marketing willwas planned to be performed by AkzoNobel by way of an off-take agreement for acquisition of the partnership’s products. An additional 50 thousand tonnes per year of white potash will be produced and marketed by ICL.

Pursuant to the agreement mentioned above, subject to certain conditions, ICL willagreed to finance and construct two manufacturing facilities on its mining site in Suria which is located in Catalona in Spain. Each vacuum facility willplanned to have a production capacity of 750 thousand tonnes of vacuum salt per year. ConstructionThe commissioning of the first facility was completed in 2016, and its test run period istowards the third quarter of 2018.

59

The agreement provides a specific deadline (July 1, 2018) by which certain condition precedent had to be completedfulfilled. Since such condition precedent was not met by the agreed deadline, the Company formally informed AkzoNobel that, the agreement had to be deemed automatically terminated once that deadline passed. The Company will continue to supply salt to AkzoNobel during the next two years pursuant to the supply agreements, which remain in force. Following correspondence between AkzoNobel and the Company, in which AkzoNobel challenged the automatic termination of the agreement, on August 2018, AkzoNobel commenced arbitration proceedings according to the agreement between the parties. The Company filed its response on October 2018. On January 2019, three arbitrators were appointed to follow the proceeding.
In September 2018, a definitive Urban Master Plan (PDU) was approved, constituting the next stage in the second quarterSuria site expansion. The PDU allows, among other things, to expand the industrial area to new facilities in Suria needed for increasing the capacity.
The production of 2017. Constructionpotash in Spain is expected to be about 1 million tonnes per year and to reach a level of up to about 1.3 million tonnes per year after completion of the secondnecessary adjustments. In order to support the expected operational expansion in Spain, the Company is in the process of setting up a new designated facility in the Barcelona port that will replace the current facility and is making preparations for transition to use thereof. The new facility is expected to be completedconstructed and operative towards the end of 2019.
In 2015, Generalitat Catalunya launched a new project to renovate and duplicate the existing brine collector from Abrera up to Suria and Sallent. The new trench will allow to increase the capacity and improve the existing salt treatment of ICL. The Company is negotiating with the authorities regards the new collector from the production site, in 2019. However, dueorder to secure the future operation.
United Kingdom
Further to the market conditions,Company’s decision to accelerate the transition from extraction and production of potash to production of Polysulphate™ in the ICL Boulby mine in the UK, at the end of the second quarter of 2018 the Company is examining improved alternatives with respectceased the production of potash and shifted to sole production of Polysulphate. The workforce reduction as a result of the transition to production of Polysulphate was about 180 positions. Further to the second facility. Construction oflosses recorded in 2017, ICL Boulby recorded notable losses during 2018 and is expected to continue to record losses throughout the facilities for production of vacuum salt, with an investment of about130 million (about $142 million), is part of the total investment ICL announced as part of expansion of the structural change of ICL Iberia (the "Phoenix" project) for development and expansion of the production capacity in Spain.


On October 2016, the Company decidedtransition process from potash to terminate Allana investment project in Ethiopia (originally aimed to develop Potash operation in Ethiopia), in light of the Ethiopian government’s failure to provide the necessary infrastructures and regulatory framework for the Project.Polysulphate. For additional information, please see “Item 3. Key Information—4 - Information on the Company— D. Risk Factors”Property, Plant and Equipment— Mineral Extraction and Mining Operations” and “Reserves”.

Competition

The potash market is characterized by a relatively small number of manufacturers, some of which export jointly. See “Item 3.See“Item 3 - Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business—Our operations and sales are subjectexposed to the volatility of marketin the supply and demand, mergers of key producers\customers\suppliers, expansion of production capacity and we face significant competition from some of the world’s largest chemical and mining companies”. Our operations and sales are subject to the volatility of market supply and demand and we face significant competition from some of the world’s largest chemical and mining companies.” The ability to compete in the potash market is dependent mainly on production costs and logistics.logistic capabilities. Moreover, there are high entry barriers to entry for new players. The barriers to entry into the potash market are highplayers due to the large investments required to establish production plants for basic mineralssignificant investment and the relatively longlength of time required to establish these plants.potash operations. In addition, this industry requires appropriate concessions and proximity of production facilities to the mines. Nonetheless, two large fertilizer companies are carrying on
60

During 2018, the new (“Green Field”) projects,(Greenfield) mines experienced slower than expected ramp-up, partly due to operational challenges. According to market observers, K+S experiences some difficulties with the granulation stage production process in its Bethune mine in Saskatchewan (Canada), which are scheduledstarted producing potash in June 2017, led it to enter into productiondeliver standard MOP to the Far East including China. In addition, K+S, closed its Sigmundshall site in 2017. The GermanGermany (capacity of 0.75 million tonnes per year in 2017). EuroChem, has cut its forecast for 2018 output from its new mines in Russia, Usolskiy (expected nameplate capacity of 3.7 million tonnes per year in 2024) and Volgakaliy (expected nameplate capacity of 4.6 million tonnes per year in 2024) to a total of about 0.3 million tonnes. Turkmenhimiya's new potash producer, K+S,mine (Garlyk) in Turkmenistan, which was inaugurated in March 2017 (nameplate capacity of 1.4 million tonnes per year), is developing the “Legacy”believed to be inoperable. Slavkaliy's Nezhinsky potash project in Canada, having a planned productionBelarus (expected nameplate capacity of about 2 million tonnes per year. In Russia, EuroChem is developing two new mines, each having a planned annual production capacity of 2.3 million tonnes.

The significant competitors of ICL Potash in the international trade in the potash sector are PotashCorp of Saskatchewan (Canada), Belaruskali (Belarus), Mosaic (Canada), Uralkali (Russia), K+S (Germany), Agrium (Canada), APC (Jordan) and SQM (Chile). See below regarding the PotashCorp and Agrium merger.

At the end of 2016, the Canadian companies, PotashCorp and Agrium, gave notice of merger of the companies. The merger was approved by the Board of Directors of both companies andyear) ramp-up is expected to be executeddelayed from 2020 to 2022. Belaruskali's Petrikov project (expected nameplate capacity of 1.5 million tonnes per year in mid-2017. The Company does2022) ramp-up is expected in 2020. 

Mosaic commissioned the new production skip at its Esterhazy K3 mine in Saskatchewan (Canada) in December 2018. This Brownfield project is expected to reach its full operational capacity (7.35 million tonnes per year) by 2024. In Russia, there were reports of flooding at Uralkali's Solikamsk 2 mine, although it seems like there was not expect a significant impact on the potash business environment marketUralkali's production as a result ofit continued its production from the merger.

Although thereadjacent Solikamsk 1 mine. Lao Kaiyuan is currently excess production capacity inexpected to expand the industry, a number of companies are continuing to develop new mines and other companies are expanding the


productionnameplate capacity of existing plants. There is uncertaintyits Khammouans site in respect of realization of these plans and the time required for their achievement. In addition, a number of companies have announced that they are examining the possibility of entering into the potash industry. An increase in the actual production capacity or an expectation for such an increase may result in pressure on the existing players in the market, in such a way that could leadLaos from 0.5 to an increase in the competition. Despite that stated, during 2016, several potash producers reduced their production in order to manage the inventories against the background of declining prices. PotashCorp curtailed its potash production at two Saskatchewan mines. There was a four-week maintenance shutdown at the Allan and Lanigan mines, beginning on March 20, 2016, resulting in an estimated 400,000 tonne reduction in the 2016 MOP production. This followed the January 19, 2016 announcement of PotashCorp regarding an indefinite suspension of production at its newly constructed Piccadilly mine in New Brunswick)Canada), removing 2 million tonnes of nameplate capacity. In the second half of 2016, Mosaic temporarily halted production at its Colonsay mine, which has an estimated production capacity of 2.51.5 million tonnes per year. Inyear until 2021. It should be mentioned that nameplate capacities are in accordance with Informa (Fertecon) Potash Outlook Report - December 2018. Other information is in accordance with CRU Fertilizer Week.  

The current significant competitors of ICL in the second quarterinternational trade of 2016, Intrepid Potash idled the Carlsbad West facility,potash market are Nutrien (Canada), Uralkali (Russia), Mosaic (USA), Belaruskali (Belarus), K+S (Germany), QSL (China), APC (Jordan), EuroChem (Russia) and converted Carlsbad East to Trio® production, removing about 500,000 tonnes per year of potash capacity. The flooding of Uralkali’s two mines at Solikamsk at the end of 2015 reduced the company’s production of potash from 11.4 million tonnes in 2015 to 10.8 million tonnes in 2016.SQM (Chile).
61


The Company believes ICL Potashits potash business benefits from the following competitive advantages:

·The relatively low average cost of potash production at the Dead Sea whileby using the sun as a solar energy source in the evaporation process.

·Logistical advantages due to its geographical location, access to nearby ports in Israel and Europe and relative proximity to its customers, which are reflected in particularly competitive marine and overland shipping costs and delivery times.

·LogisticalClimate advantages due to the hot and dry climate of the Dead Sea that enable ICLthe Company to store, at very low cost, a large quantity of potash in an open area thereby allowing ICLit to consistentlyconstantly produce at Sodom at full capacity, independent of fluctuations in global potash demand.

·A professional agronomic sales team that focuses on individually-tailoredindividually‑tailored agronomic consulting to customers based on an analysis of the different growing conditions of each particular customer.

·ImplementationA leading R&D set‑up in the area of the efficiency plan which has been applied for several years has led a significant decline in costs per tonne, mainly in Dead Sea Works, and is expected to continue as part of operational excellence.potash production.

·Synergies between the various production plants in Sodom site.
Raw Materials and Suppliers

ICL

The Potash segment produces potash through its mining operations in Israel Spain and the United Kingdom, as discussed further below.Spain. Potash does not require additional chemical conversion to be used as a plant-nutrientplant‑nutrient fertilizer. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—D. Property, Plants and Equipment—Mineral Extraction and Mining Operations”, for further information on the Company's mining operations.

The other primary componentsutilities used by ICL in order to support the potash production of potash are natural gas, electricity, industrial water and neutralization materials and maintenance supplies.

materials.

In 2015, the Israeli Public Utilities Authority – Electricity resolved to impose certain electricity system management services charges also on private electricity producers as opposed to only on private consumers, this being retroactively from June 2013.

Sales, Marketing and Distribution

The primary markets of ICLthe Potash business are Europe, China, Brazil and India. ICLThe Potash business sells its fertilizerfertilizers products primarily via a network of its own sales offices as well as sales through agents throughout the world.
Most of the potash sales of potash are not made by means of contracts or long-termlong‑term orders but, rather, through current orders proximate to the supply date (except for long-termannual agreements with customers in India and China)China, see below). Accordingly, ICLthe Potash segment does not have a significant orders' backlog. Regarding new contracts with customers of ICL Potash in China for supply of potash over the next three years – see below.

The prices of potash are determined in negotiations between the manufacturers and the customers and are affected mainly by the relationship between the market demand and the available supply at that date as well as the size of the customer and period of the agreement. Prices for relatively long-termlong‑term contracts are not necessarily similar to the “SPOT” prices (current/casual salessale transactions).

In the Indian and Chinese markets, it is customary to carry on concentrated negotiations regarding the potash contracts – part of which with commercial entities related to the governments of those countries.


62

In January 2016,August 2018, ICL signed newa potash supply contract with its Indian customers, in the total amount of 775 thousand tonnes (including optional quantities), for delivery between September 2018 and June 2019. The contract price is $290 per tonne CFR (an increase of $50 per tonne compared with the 2017 contract price).
In September 2018, ICL signed a potash supply contract with its Chinese customers, in the total amount of 905 thousand tonnes (not including additional optional quantities), for delivery up to June 2019. The contract price is $290 per tonne CFR (an increase of $60 per tonne compared with the 2017 contract price).
In November 2018, ICL has signed framework agreements with its customers in China for the2019-2021, to supply of approximately 3.43 million tonnes of potash, over the next three years, an increase of about 3% inwith additional options for 750 thousand tonnes. Prices for the quantities to be supplied comparedare subject to the previous three-year framework agreements. The selling priceprevailing market prices in China at the relevant date of supply.
In December 2018, ICL signed for the first time a five-year potash supply agreement with Indian Potash Limited ("IPL"), India's largest importer of potash. According to the agreement, ICL is expected to supply IPL with 600 thousand tonnes per year in 2019 and 2020, increasing to 650 thousand tonnes per year in 2021-2023 (including optional quantities). Prices will be determined onin accordance with the basis of the accepted price levels in the Chinese potash market.

ICL Potash has agreements in China with manufacturers and distributors of NPK fertilizers. As part of these agreements, the agreed contract price is generally for six months to one year.

In 2016, ICL signed contracts for supply of potash with its customersprevailing market prices in India covering an aggregate quantityat the relevant date of 760 thousand tonnes, including optional quantities. In the Company’s estimation, an improvement in the farmers’ demand for potash in India is expected in 2017, assuming there is no negative change for the worse in the government subsidies and that the weather conditions will not have an unfavorable impact on agriculture.

supply.

In other markets, potash is usually imported by a larger number of customers, and the potash price is determined between the suppliers and the customers for shorter periods (quarterly, monthly or even for individual shipments). In these markets, the Company has trade relations with most of the major customers.

For information regarding ICL Haifa potash supply agreement in Israel for the next 13 years, see “Item 8 – Legal Proceedings”.

In Sodom, the Company benefits from being able to store very large amounts of potash outside (exceeding one full year of production). Due to the hot and dry climate in Sodom, potash can be stored in piles in open areas. Therefore, potash production in the production facilities in Sodom is not necessarily dependent on the rate of sales. Output that is not sold


is stored in open areas within the plant in Sodom. This advantage generally affords ICL

The Potash greater production flexibility in Spain and the United Kingdom as well since it can sell from Europe while maintaining its main potash inventory in Sodom.

ICL Potashbusiness transports potash from Israel to customers overseas by shipships (mainly in bulk) that it leases in the market and loads using designated facilities in the ports of Ashdod on the Mediterranean Sea and Eilat on the Red Sea. ICLThe Potash business also has special portdesignated facilities for bulk loading at ports in Barcelona (Spain), Amsterdam (the Netherlands), Ludwigshafen (Germany) and Teesside (UK).

ICL In Israel, short mine-to-port distances and shorter shipping routes to emerging markets grants the Potash business a significant and a unique advantage over its main competitors. In order to support the expected operational expansion in Spain, the Company is in the process of setting up a new designated facility in the Barcelona port that will replace the current facility and is making preparations for transition to use thereof. The new facility is expected to be constructed and operative towards the end of 2019.

The Potash segment grants credit terms to its clients according to customary practices in their locations. ICL Potash’sThe segments’s credit sales are generally covered by trade credit risk insurance or by letters of credit from banks with high credit ratings.

ICL involved in number of activities dealing with the need for increasing food quality, as well as for increased efficiency in the agriculture sector, to respond to the world’s growing population, decreasing agricultural land and the urgent need for greater environmental stewardship:
Potash for Life (India) -In 2016, the Company continued investing in instructing emerging market farmers regarding the economic advantages of optimizing the use of potash-based fertilizers. In 2016,2018, the Company continued the “Potash for Life” project and focused particularly onin India, in light of its position in this market and the relatively low concentrationuse of potassium fertilization in this country, and held illustrative demonstrationscountry. About 1,000 demonstration plots were conducted in nine territoriesfarmers' fields in ten states and more than 42 districtsdistricts. Other educative activities, like farmers' field days, potash campaigns and crop seminars were also conducted.
63

Feed the Future (Tanzania) - In May 2017, the United States Agency for international development (USAID) sent out a call for proposal of funding under the Feed the Future Tanzania Mboga na Matunda (Fruit and Vegetables) program. Over 70 agricultural companies applied, ICL was one of the few companies that won the co-funding award. Through the USAID funded project, ICL seeks to strengthen the fertilizer input supply system by providing high quality and innovative products through demonstrations and training on balanced fertilization. It will also create awareness of ICL's fertilizers products and the adoption of sustainable fertilization practices.
Research Center for Fertilizers & Plant Nutrition – Global Knowledge - In 2015, ICL established a Center for Fertilization and Plant Nutrition (CFPN). The CFPN is a global center for research and knowledge in about 2,500 parcels.

the field of fertilizers and plant nutrition in conjunction with Israel’s Agricultural Research Organization (ARO). Research is conducted by ARO scientists in partnership with colleagues from other research institutions. The CFPN offers scholarships and research grants to graduate and Ph.D. students in Israel and from abroad. CFPN trains and works with foreign students from Asia and East Africa. Training courses and workshops are conducted for Israeli farmers and agronomists from the world.

International Potash Institute (IPI) - ICL is part of IPI, a non-governmental and non-profit organization whose mission is to develop and promote balanced fertilization for the production of higher yields and more nutritious food, together with ensuring sustainability of production through conservation of soil fertility for future generations. IPI conducted in 2018 dozens of field experiments and research projects worldwide. In addition, several farmers' days and workshops were conducted in Asia, Africa, Europe and Latin America.
Seasonality

The seasonal nature of the demand for ICL Potash’sthe Potash business’s products gives rise generally to quarterly sales fluctuations, as sales levels in the second and third quarters are generally higher than sales in the first and fourth quarters. In recent years, due to various influences on the timing of sales, primarily price fluctuations and the effects of negotiations in China and India and changes in the timing of fertilizer imports to Brazil, the effects of seasonality explained above have been reduced as compared to earlier periods. In the years 2016 to 2018, the delay in signing of the contracts with the Chinese and Indian customers caused a situation wherein the total sales in the second half of the year were higher than in the first half of the year.

Natural Resources Tax

On November 30, 2015, the Knesset passed the

The Law for Taxation of Profits from Natural Resources, which entered into effect on January 1, 2016, except with respect to DSWICL Dead Sea (potash operation) regarding which the effective date iswas January 1, 2017. For additional information, see Note 17 to our audited financial statements.

Polysulphate

Audited Financial Statements.

Additional products
The Potash segment produces and sells additional products, including Polysulphate™, magnesium-based products, salt produced in underground mines in UK and Spain, electricity surplus produced in Israel and others.

64

FertilizerpluS
FertilizerpluS is ICL's premium fertilizers line, based mainly on polyhalite (marketed by the Company also minesas Polysulphate™) and produces polysulphate (also known as polyhalite)other products. FertilizerpluS products, which include different compounds of phosphorus, sulphur, potassium, magnesium and calcium, are tailored for various types of soil and wide range of crops, intended to enhance crops, improve yields and increase fertilizer efficiency.
Polyhalite is a mineral that is exclusively mined by ICL through the Potash segment in a subterranean underground mine in the UK. PolysulphateUK and is a mineralmarketed under the brand name Polysulphate™. Polysulphate™ is used in its natural form as a fully soluble and natural fertilizer, for agriculture, fertilizerwhich is also used for organic agriculture and as a raw material for production of specialty fertilizers. PolysulphatePolysulphate™ is composed of sulfursulphur (SO3 48%), potash (K2O 14%), calcium (CaO 17%) and magnesium (MgO 6%), which are essential components for improvement of crops and agricultural products.

Polysulphate™ is the basis for many of the Company's FertilizerpluS products.

The Company sees the Polysulphate™ as a unique product for ICL and is synergistic with the Company’s other raw materials for purposes of development of downstream products. In order to develop downstream products, the Company is acting to continue expansion ofexpand the polysulphatePolysulphate™ market by means of, among other things, development of a wide variety of innovative polysulphatePolysulphate™-based products. In 2017, ICL will commence commercial production ofaddition, in order to develop the Polysulphate™ market for both existing and new uses, the Potash segment has set up a new product named “PotashpluS”, which is composed of polysulphate and potash. The product will include potassium, sulfur, calcium and magnesium. During 2016, ICL set-up a staffteam of agronomists that are performing dozens of tests on various crops in different countriescountries. The favorable results of these tests are the basis for expansion of the sales to new customers and markets.
The Company believes that the FertilizerpluS product line benefits from the following competitive advantages:
·ICL is the sole producer of Polysulphate™ worldwide.
·ICL Boulby's infrastructure supporting Polysulphate production (previously used for potash production) is already in place, including mine, shaft and transportation logistics.
·The ability to increase production at a relatively low capital expenditure.
·The Polysulphate™ and Polysulphate™-based fertilizers, which include different compounds of phosphorus, sulphur, magnesium and calcium, are tailored for various types of soil and a wide range of crops, achieved high performance in enhancing crops, improving yields and increasing fertilizer efficiency.
·Polysulphate™ contributes to and follows the main market trends in the fields of increased nutrient-use efficiency, low carbon footprint and organic fertilizers.
·The FertilizerpluS product line is part of ICL’s strong market position in fertilizers.
·
The FertilizerpluS product line has an inherent potential for the development of new products and applications.

65

Following are several examples of Polysulphate™-based products included in orderthe FertilizerpluS line:
·PotashpluS – a compressed mixture of Polysulphate™ and potash. The product includes potassium, sulphur, calcium and magnesium and is marketed by the Potash segment. In the third quarter of 2018, the segment finalized the industrialization process for the production of PotashpluS and in 2019 plans to increase significantly the production and the sales quantities of the product.
·PKpluS – a unique combination of phosphate, potash and Polysulphate™. In 2018, the Company, through the Phosphate Solutions segment, sold the product in commercial quantities and in 2019 plans to increase the production and the sales quantities of the product.
At the end of the second quarter of 2018, the Company ceased the production of potash in ICL Boulby mine in the UK and shifted to developsole production of Polysulphate™ and salt.
In 2018, the polysulphate market.


Company produced approximately 350 thousand tonnes of Polysulphate. The production of Polysulphate in UK is in the ramp-up stages and is expected to reach full production capacity towards the end of 2020. The current annual potential production capacity of the polysulphate facilitiesPolysulphate™ is approximatelyabove 1 million tonnes.

During 2016, The potential production capacity is based on the Company decidedhourly output of the plants, multiplied by potential hours of operation per year. This calculation assumes continuous production over the year, 24 hours a day, with the exception of a few days for planned maintenance and renovations. Actual production is usually lower than the potential production capacity due to accelerateunexpected breakdowns, special maintenance operations, non‑availability of raw materials and market conditions.

As of the transition from extractingdate of this report, ICL's Boulby mine is the sole producer of Polysulphate worldwide. However, in North Yorkshire in the UK, where ICL's Polysulphate operations are located, there is an additional concession owned by another potential producer, which, according to its formal publications, plans to develop a polyhalite mine with a production capacity of up to 10 million tonnes, subject to its ability to raise several billions of dollars for the mine development. If successful in raising the funds and producing potash to producing polysulphate at its ICL UK mine.build the mine and operations, ICL will actcease to expandbe the polysulphatesole producer of Polysulphate, and will not be the market by means of, among other things, development of a wide range of innovative polysulphate products. Duringleader, which is inconsistent with the accelerated production period of polysulphate, mining ofCompany's strategy to obtain leadership positions in all its activities. ICL is constantly monitoring the economically viable potash reservescompetitive environment and will continue until they are fully depleted, albeit at a slower rate than in 2015 and 2016. In 2017, the Company is planning to produce about 450 thousand tonnes of polysulphate andseek ways to increase the production up to about 1 million tonnes in 2019. As part of these processes, the Company has completed implementation of the efficiency plan, whereby during 2016 reduction of the work force by about 470 positions was completed.

ICL adhere with its strategy.  

Magnesium business line

The Potash segment includes magnesium activities, are included in ICLoperated by Dead Sea Magnesium Ltd., which is the second largest magnesium producer in the western world after the US magnesium producer “US Magnesium”Magnesium LLC”. ICL MagnesiumThe magnesium business produces, markets and sells pure magnesium and magnesium alloys, and also produces dry carnallite and related by-products,by‑products, including chlorine and sylvinite.

Magnesium is considered to be the lightest structural metal. One of the main characteristics of magnesium is a higher strength-to-weightstrength-to‑weight ratio compared with other metals – mainly steel and aluminum. The main useuses of magnesium isare in the following industrial sectors: the aluminum sector, wherein it serves as the main alloy in the manufacture of aluminum alloys; the steel sector, where it is an auxiliary material used in the steel desulphurization; and the casting sector of parts made of magnesium alloys mainly(mainly for uses in the vehicle industry. In addition, there are other sectors in which magnesium is used, the market share of which is relatively small, such as use of magnesium in the production processes of zirconium and titanium alloys.

The current annual potential production capacity of the magnesium facilities is 33 thousand tonnes of metal magnesium. The actual quantity of the magnesium produced depends on the demand for chlorine (used in the bromine operations) and, therefore, it is possible that the actual production will be lower than the production capacity.

industry).

66

Production of the magnesium is based on the carnallite gathered from the Dead Sea and acquired from ICL Dead Sea. During the electrolysis process, the magnesium chloride present in the carnallite is separated into metal magnesium and chlorine gas.

In 2018, the Potash segment produced approximately 21 thousand tonnes of magnesium.
The current annual potential production capacity of the magnesium facilities is 33 thousand tonnes of metal magnesium. The actual quantity of the magnesium produced depends on the demand for chlorine (used in the production of bromine) and, therefore, it is possible that the actual production will be lower than the production capacity. Additional factors that can reduce the actual production are unexpected breakdowns, special maintenance operations, non‑availability of raw materials and market conditions. The potential production capacity of our various plants is characterizedbased on the hourly output of the plants, multiplied by concentrationpotential hours of operation per year. This calculation assumes continuous production where about 75%over the year, 24 hours a day.
About 85% of the production in the magnesium market is in China. There are a small number of western producers, US Magnesiumincluding in the United States, Brazil and RIMA in Brazil. In both the United States and Brazil there are anti-dumping tariffs regarding sale of Chinese magnesium. In Russia, there are a number of magnesium producers that mainly supply the local titanium industry.

Over the past several years, ICL has discerned a trend in the Chinese market of transition to “greener” production processes (from thermal recycling plants to plants producing magnesium by means of an electrolysis process), closing of small factories and setting up of large factories that are more “environmentally friendly”. These trends are part of the reasons causing the trend of increasing prices of the magnesium produced in China. During the last few months of the year there was a drop in magnesium prices in China, whereas in January 2017 the trend of rising prices resumed.


The magnesium market in Europe is controlled mainly by Chinese producers and distributors (since there is no European producer and accordingly it is not possible to impose anti-dumping tariffs).

From a global standpoint with respect to consumption of magnesium, the Chinese market constitutes about 50% of the global market, the European market slightly less than 20% and the United States market about 15%.

Russia. In the United States and Brazil, import of magnesium and magnesium alloys from China is subject to anti-dumping duties that are imposed in order to protect the local industryproducer in these countries that arecountries.

In October 2018, a petition was filed to the main markets in which ICL Magnesium sells its products.

In August 2014, following publicationInternational Trade Administration of the interim conclusionsUS Department of the Sheshinski Committee, the Company's Board of Directors examined the economic viability of continuation and expansion of the production of certain products, including potash, metal magnesium, bromine compounds and downstream phosphate products. In light of the Committee's final recommendationsCommerce and the approval thereofUS International Trade Commission by the Social-Economic Cabineta US magnesium competitor (hereinafter - US Magnesium), to impose antidumping and countervailing duties on imports of magnesium from Israel. US Magnesium claims that imports of magnesium produced in November 2014, the Company's Board of Directors adopted the following decision, further to decision it had adopted in August 2014 – the principle of which is to make preparations for closure of our magnesium plant at theIsrael by Dead Sea commencing January 1, 2017, insofar as discussions with the State of Israel regarding taxMagnesium Ltd. are being subsidized and royalties issues would disallow the continued operation of the magnesium plant. The main economic justification for continuation of operationssold at the magnesium plant at the Dead Sea stems from the plant’s synergies with our other facilities in Sodom, which provide it with, and receive from it, raw materials (the “Synergies”). The increased tax burden imposed pursuant to the implication of Natural Resources Income Tax in Israel, caused a declineless than fair value in the net valueUS market. The US Department of the Synergies.Commerce is expected to issue its preliminary determination with respect to subsidies on May 2, 2019. As a result of the aforesaid increases of the tax burden, we have discontinued all investments in the magnesium plant (other than investments required by law). In light of the above, as ofat the date of the report, considering the Company continues to examine the continuation of ICL Magnesium, pending also final clarificationearly stage of the tax effects, royalties, and cost of participationproceedings, there is a difficulty in estimating the chances the petition will be accepted or whether tariffs will be imposed in the management servicesfuture. Market reaction has seen impact through increased prices coupled with future supply concerns by consumers. For additional information, see “Item 3 - Key Information— D. Risk Factors— Risks Related to Our Business— Our magnesium sales in the Unites States are under investigation by the International Trade Administration of the electric system that are expected to be imposed onU.S. Department of Commerce and the plant. In 2016, the sales of ICL Magnesium amounted to $103 million, its operating loss amounted to $22 million, its net fixed assets as at December 31, 2016 amounted to $35 million, and its depreciation expenses in 2016 amounted to $7 million.

U.S. International Trade Commission.”

The Company believes ICLthat the magnesium business benefits from the following competitive advantages:

·Level of cleanliness of the metal magnesium product permits use of the Company's products the level of the magnesium cleanliness and quality that permits its use in sensitive and unique industries, the Company's developed magnesium alloys and intellectual property that allows the production of advanced magnesium applications and the utilization of by-product produced during the magnesium production for other activities in sensitive industries.

·Intellectual property that permits production of products on the basis of magnesium alloys that are unique to the Company.

ICL (e.g. chlorine, etc.).

The global magnesium markets can be divided in two in terms of prices: regulated markets (based on prices of the local producers in US and Brazil) and ROW markets (Rest of the World - based on Chinese magnesium prices). Chinese magnesium prices have increased during 2018 mainly due to tightness of environmental regulations imposed in China. However, they are still significantly lower than the prices in the regulated markets. Most of DSM's sales are designated for the regulated markets and specific niche markets. The price levels in the regulated markets has slightly increased during 2018, despite this increase, their relatively low level resulted in DSM's negative results over the last few years as well as in 2018.
67


Phosphate Solutions Segment
The strategy of the Phosphate Solutions segment is to be a leading provider of value added specialty solutions based on phosphate for the industrial, food and agriculture markets. The segment’s goal is to outgrow the market by enhancing its customer relationships and at the same time optimizing its upstream capabilities directed towards specialties products. The segment operates in two main streams: Phosphate Specialties and Phosphate Commodities. The diversification into higher value-added specialty products leverages ICL's integrated business line

model and provides it with additional margins on top of the commodity margin.

The ICL Phosphate business line mines and processesSolutions segment is based on a phosphate value chain which uses phosphate commodity products, such as phosphate rock and fertilizer-grade phosphoric acid (“green phosphoric acid”), to produce specialty products with higher added value. The segment also produces and markets phosphate-based fertilizers.
Phosphate rock is mined and processed from open pit mines, three of which are located in the Negev Desert in Israel while the fourth is situatedlocated in the Yunnan province in China. In addition, ICL produces sulfuricSulphuric acid, agriculturalgreen phosphoric acid and phosphate fertilizers are produced in its facilities in Israel, China and Europe. Furthermore, ICL
The Phosphate Solutions segment purifies some of its green phosphoric acid and manufactures phosphate-based food additivesthermal phosphoric acid to provide solutions based on specialty phosphate salts and acids for livestockdiversified industrial end markets, such as oral care, cleaning products, paints and coatings, water treatment, asphalt modification, construction and metal treatment. The specialty phosphate salts and acids are mainly produced in Turkey. ICL Phosphate markets its products worldwide, mainlythe Company’s facilities in Europe,US, Brazil, IndiaGermany and China.

The segment is also a leader in developing and producing functional food ingredients and phosphate additives, which provide texture and stability solutions for the processed meat, poultry, seafood, dairy, beverage and baked goods markets. In 2016,addition, the segment supplies pure phosphoric acid to ICL’s specialty fertilizers business and produces milk and whey proteins for the food ingredients industry.

Phosphate Solutions: Backward Integrated Value Chain
68

In 2018, the total sales of ICLthe Phosphate Solutions segment were $ 1,163$2,099 million, and accounted for 48%constituting 38% of ICL's total sales (including sales to other segments), while the operating income of Phosphate Solutions totaled $208 million, constituting 21% of the Essential Minerals segment’s sales. Theoperating income attributable to the segments.
In 2018, total sales of ICL Phosphate in 2016 increased by $99Specialties, were $1,197 million (constituting 57% of the Phosphate Solutions segment’s sales), reflecting an increase of $71 million or 9%6% compared to 2015.2017. The operating income of Phosphate Specialties, in 2018 totaled $171 million, reflecting an increase of $45 million or 36% compared to 2017.
In 2018, total sales of Phosphate Commodities, were $1,069 million (constituting 51% of the Phosphate Solutions segment’s sales and including sales to Phosphate Specialties), reflecting an increase of $17 million or 2% compared to 2017. The operating income of Phosphate Commodities in 2018 totaled $37 million, reflecting an increase of $14 million or 61% compared to 2017. For additional information, see “Item 5.A5 - Operating Results”and Financial Review and Prospects— A. Operating Results— Results of Operations”.


Products

The mainPhosphate Solutions segment produces a variety of products of ICL based on its backward integrated value chain.
Phosphate are phosphate fertilizers (among which are DAP, MAP, TSP, SSP and others) and phosphate rock.

Phosphorus is contains phosphorus, one of the three essential nutrients for plant development, which directly contributes to a wide range of physiological processes in a plant, including production of sugars (including starch), photosynthesis and energy transfer. Phosphorus strengthens plant stems, stimulates root development, promotes flower formation and accelerates crop development. Phosphorus mayPhosphate rock can be found in phosphate rock. The main products in this area are: phosphate rock,utilized for the production of phosphoric acid and phosphate-, potassium-can be sold as a raw material to other fertilizer producers. Our phosphate rock is mined and nitrogen-based fertilizers.

During October 2015, ICL completed establishmentprocessed from open pit mines and undergoes a beneficiation process, after which high‑grade, multi‑purpose phosphate products are received.

Green phosphoric acid (fertilizer-grade phosphoric acid) is produced by using beneficiated rock and sulphuric acid (produced by the segment, by using sulphur acquired from third parties). Most of the YPH joint venture,green phosphoric acid is used to produce phosphate-based fertilizers and pure phosphoric acid, and in some cases is sold to external costumers.
Phosphate fertilizers are produced by using green phosphoric acid or sulphuric acid, depending on the fertilizer type. The segment manufactures various types of fertilizers (TSP, SSP, GTSP and others) for different uses.
The segment manufactures pure phosphoric acid in Israel by purifying green phosphoric acid and also manufactures technical-grade purified phosphoric acid and green phosphoric acid in China, pure phosphoric acid in Brazil, and food grade and industrial phosphate salts in Israel, Germany, Brazil, the US and Mexico. Pure phosphoric acid and green phosphoric acid are used to manufacture downstream products with high added value, such as phosphate salts and acids for a wide range of food and industrial applications. In addition, the segment supplies pure phosphoric acid to ICL’s specialty fertilizers business.
Phosphate salts and acids are used in various industrial end markets, such as oral care, cleaning products, paints and coatings, water treatment, asphalt modification, construction, metal treatment and a variety of other industries.
69

The segment's products for the food industry include functional food ingredients and phosphate additives, which provide texture and stability solutions for the processed meat, poultry, seafood, dairy, beverage and baked goods markets. In addition, the segment produces milk proteins and whey proteins for the food ingredients industry and offers spices and spice blends for the processed meat and poultry industries.
Some of ICL's products for the chemical and the food industries are based on its intellectual property and have well-known brand names in their relevant markets.
Production
Phosphate Solutions segment has a developed production setup from phosphate rock minemining, along with production and phosphate operations,purchase of different grades of phosphoric acid, and that operates an integrated phosphate platform across the entire value chain. Dueup to the sharp decrease in commodity phosphate prices since the acquisition was completed and due to the fact that the JV’s major activities (90%) are still focused on commodities, the YPH JV recorded in 2016 a reported operating loss of about $80 million which included a provision for early retirement in the amount of $10 million. The loss was recorded despite implementation of significant efficiency measures. Continued implementation of efficiency measures and a gradual shift to specialty products (up to a 50/50 balance within 4 years) are expected to support the JV’s profitability in the short and medium terms. The JV contributed $343 million to ICL Phosphate’s sales in 2016.

The principal raw material used in the production of phosphatecommodities and specialties products in different facilities around the world.

Phosphate rock is phosphate rock. ICL Phosphatemined and processed from open pit mines, phosphate rock from open-pit mines – three of which are located in the Negev Desert in Israel while the fourth is situated in the Yunnan districtprovince in China. In 2016, 74% of the phosphate rock produced in Israel and all the phosphate rock produced in China was used to manufacture phosphoric acid. The phosphate rock produced in Israel is sold to external customers who manufacture phosphoricPhosphate Solutions segment produces sulphuric acid, and fertilizers and as a direct application fertilizer. The policy of ICL Phosphate is to use most of the phosphate rock it produces to manufacture downstream products.

ICL Phosphate produces fertilizer-gradegreen phosphoric acid and phosphate fertilizers at its facilities in Israel and in China. Furthermore, ICL PhosphateThe segment also hasoperates facilities for the production of phosphate fertilizers in the Netherlands and Germany, as well as animal-feedanimal‑feed additives facilities in Turkey. An additional raw material required for productionThe segment's specialty products are manufactured in its facilities in Germany, the United States, Israel, Brazil, China, UK, Argentina, Australia and Mexico. These facilities enable the segment to produce customer-specific solutions meeting the requirement of phosphoric acid is sulfur, which ICL Phosphate purchases from third parties.

ICL Phosphate is also developing additional downstream products based on phosphate rock, including phosphate fertilizersthe different markets. Additionally, the segment produces milk and acids usedwhey proteins for the production of downstream products for the ICL Advanced Additives, ICL Food Specialties and ICL Specialty Fertilizers business lines.

Production

ICL Phosphate’sfood ingredients industry in its facility in Austria.

70

The Phosphate Solutions segment's principal production facilities include its plants in Israel and China (phosphate rock, sulfuric acid, phosphoric acid and fertilizers), in the Netherlands and Germany (mainly fertilizers based on phosphate and potash) as well as in Turkey (phosphate-based products used as animal-feed additives).


ICL Phosphate’s manufacturing plants, distribution centers and marketing companies are set forth in the map below:

 


The current annual potential phosphate production capacity is as follows: approximately 7 million tonnes of phosphate rock, (including 2.5 million tonnes of YPH’s production capability), approximately 2.7 million tonnes of phosphate fertilizers, and compound fertilizers (including 850 thousand tonnes of YPH’s production capability) and approximately 1.3 million tonnes of green phosphoric acid, (including 700approximately 345 thousand tonnes of YPH’s production capability).purified phosphoric acid (as Phosphorus Pentoxide), approximately 385 thousand tonnes of phosphate salts. The potential production capacity of the various plants is based on the hourly output of the plants multiplied by the potential hours of operation per year. This calculation assumes continuous production over the year, 24 hours per day, with the exception of a few days for planned maintenance and renovations. Actual production is usually lower than potential production capacity, due to unexpected breakdowns, special maintenance operations, availability of raw materials and market conditions.

71

In addition,2018, Phosphate Solutions segment produced approximately: 5,006 thousand tonnes of phosphate rock, 1,195 thousand tonnes of green phosphoric acid, 2,304 thousand tonnes of phosphate fertilizers, 289 thousand tonnes of pure phosphoric acid (as Phosphorus Pentoxide), 269 thousand tonnes of phosphate salts, 71 thousand tonnes of food multi-blends.
In the second half of 2018, green phosphoric acid production at ICL Rotem was unfavorably impacted by technical operation challenges. During the third quarter of 2018, activities at ICL Rotem's Zin plant stopped for 2 months in order to adjust phosphate rock production volumes to the business environment. In November 2018, the Company is examining wayssigned an agreement with the worker's council which regulates the transition to increase its phosphate reserves, including by means of development ofa five-day workweek at ICL Rotem's Zin plant.
YPH, the Barir fieldjoint venture in Israel, see “Item 4. Information onChina, improves the Company—D. Property, Plants and Equipment—Concessions and Mining Rights". Furthermore, in October 2015, ICL completed establishment of YPH JV, which improved the production capacitycompetitiveness and flexibility of ICL’s phosphate operations by providing ICL withactivities, as a result of access to phosphate rock operation with vastextensive reserves.  The joint manufacturing platform includes activities alongover the entire value chain – commencing from miningchain. The performance of YPH JV significantly improved and shifted to profitability during 2018, mainly due to reduction in costs, increased production and sales and an increase in phosphate rock and production of fertilizers in bulk and running up to phosphate-based specialty products for applications in the food and compound materials markets.

In December 2015, ICL signed a memorandum of understanding with LLNP (of the Leviev Group) for examinationprices.

Competition
The competitive characteristics of the feasibilitysegment vary according to the type of establishment of a global-scale phosphate production infrastructureproducts it manufactures and the markets in Namibia, including marine mining of phosphate and construction of factories for production of downstream products spanning the entire value chain, including fertilizer-quality phosphoric acid, white phosphoric acid, regular phosphate fertilizers (including MAP and DAP) and specialty fertilizers. At the present time, the examination is focusing on the feasibility of the pilot for production of green acid from rock that is found in Namibia. which they are sold.
The results of the pilot are expected to be received in the first half of 2017, and thereafter the Company will decide with respect to continuation of the project.


Competition

The phosphate fertilizercommodity phosphates market is extremely competitive, and the competitors include multi-nationalmulti‑national companies and government-ownedgovernment‑owned companies. A large number ofMany producers operate in this market. Themarket and the main competitive factor in the field of phosphate fertilizers is price. The ability to compete in the market is dependent mainly on raw material costs, production costs and logistics. For this reason, companies located in proximity to sources of raw materials, ports, and customers, benefit from competitive advantages. An importantA key factor in the area of raw materials (in addition to phosphate rock) is the accessibility to and the price of the sulfursulphur and ammonia required forto manufacture of the main phosphate fertilizers. Additional factors that affect competition to a certain extent include product quality, range of products, service and the capability to develop new products that provide unique solutions.

Phosphate mines and production facilities occurare located in many countries, including Morocco, China, Russia, Jordan, the United States, Brazil, Saudi Arabia, Tunisia and others. The main phosphate producers who compete with ICL are Office Chérifien des Phosphates (OCP, from Morocco), Ma’aden (Saudi Arabia), Mosaic (United States)States and Saudi Arabia via JV with Ma'aden), PotashCorpJordan Phosphate Mines Co. (Jordan), Nutrien (Canada), OCP (Morocco), Group Chimique Tunisienne (Tunisia), Vale (Brazil)(GCT, from Tunisia), the Roullier Group (Europe), Ma’aden (Saudi Arabia) and other various Russian and Chinese producers. A significant
72

The planned production expansion is expectedduring 2018 of world's major phosphates' fertilizers producers was slower than expected: although first exports of phosphate fertilizers were executed in July 2017 from Ma'aden, Sabic and Mosaic owned project of Wa'ad Al Shamal (Saudi Arabia), its ramp–up rate during 2018 was lower than planned. Moreover, during 2018 Mosaic had shut down its Plant City (US) operations which had a capacity of about 1.2 million tonnes P2O5, due to its partnership in the Wa'ad Al Shamal project. Following that, Mosaic idled all its South Pasture mine operations in Hardee County, Florida, during September 2018. OCP (Morocco) had commissioned its fourth granular phosphate hub at Jorf Lasfar (JPH-4) during the first half of 2018, bringing its overall granular phosphates capacity to around 12 million tonnes per year. However, according to CRU Fertilizer Week, OCP adjusted its planned development strategy at this site in November 2018, and it now plans to reach 15 million tonnes per year granular phosphate capacity by the end of 2020, rather than the end of 2019. The increase includes the addition of three new granulation units of 1 million tonnes per year capacity each and are expected to have flexibility to produce SSP and TSP. OCP is also set to start up a new sulphuric acid unit in the first quarter of 2019 with a further two sulphuric acid plants, also planned to start by mid‑2020. In addition, Nutrien (Canada) closed in December 2018 its 0.2 million tonnes per year phosphoric acid production plant in Geismar (US). This shutdown, together with the conversion of two producers – OCP, and Ma’aden. These two producersNutrien's Redwater (Canada) MAP unit to ammonium sulfate production, have highled for its being fully self-sufficient in phosphate rock.
China is a significant player in the commodity phosphate market. Its industry is fully integrated based on its local phosphate rock reserves, and lowit is a net exporter of phosphate rock, although it may import phosphate rock due to both economic as well as to quality considerations. China is a major phosphate fertilizer exporter. DAP export during 2018 was 7.49 million tonnes, an increase of 17% year on year, mainly due to an increase of 51% in exports to India to 3.04 million tonnes. MAP export during 2018 was 2.49 million tonnes, a decrease of 8.2% year on year, mainly as a result of a decrease of 19% in exports to Brazil to 815 thousand tonnes, while exports to India increased by 20% to 154 thousand tonnes, according to China's General Administration of Customs. These figures were supported by higher than expected prices as a consequence of high import demand, mainly in India as the result of on Indian rupee depreciation against the US dollar, the Indian domestic fertilizers subsidy policy and in light of the above described slower than expected phosphates production costs,expansion.
Phosphate Solutions segment has a leading position in the field of pure phosphoric acid and its downstream products, as well as in the field of food grade phosphate and dairy proteins area.
The segment's competitors are large and mid-sized international companies serving the chemical and food industries, which enables them to reduce their pricescarry on manufacturing and marketing activities in order to preserve their market shares. In 2015, China significantly reduced the tax for exporting phosphate fertilizersvarious countries, as well as local companies serving local markets.
ICL's competitive advantage in specialty phosphates field derives from product features, quality, service and the local producers increased their presenceability to meet the customers’ needs.
The primary competitors of the segment in the global trade. OCP, Ma’adenchemical and food fields are Chemische Fabrik Budenheim KG, Innophos Inc., Prayon S.A, Nutrien, Adithya Birla, Haifa Chemicals Ltd., FOSFA and various Chinese producers.
Significant competitors exist in the Russian phosphate producer reacteddairy protein field, including Bayrische Milchindustrie, Arla, Fonterra, Milei, Lactoprot and Sachsenmilch. Competitiveness is primarily determined by increasing the competition level, which resulted in a price decrease throughout 2016. As a result, Chinese phosphate producers recorded losses during the yearaccess to raw materials, supply chains and reduced their production rates, which resulted in a 17%technologic know‑how.
 decrease in exports from China,73 compared to 2015. Chinese production curtailments (to a level of 50-60% of production capability) contributed to a certain stabilization in phosphate prices in Chinaandglobally towards the end of 2016. 

The Company believes ICL



Phosphate business lineSolutions segment benefits from the following competitive advantages:

·An integrated value chain that allows use ofuses the phosphate rock mined in Israel and(ICL Rotem) as well as in China (YPH) for the production of its phosphate fertilizers andgreen phosphoric acid, which serves mainly as a raw material for the production of the segment's products and for the production of ICL's specialty products that are sold by thefertilizers business lines- ICL Advanced Additives, ICL Food Specialties and ICL Specialty Fertilizers, rather than purchasing phosphate rock from third party suppliers;products.

·Logistical advantages due to its geographical location, accessclose proximity to nearby ports in Israel and Europe and relative proximity to its customers. In addition, ICL is a unique global fertilizer producer that is able to combine potash and phosphate fertilizers in the same shipment, which enables it to service smallsmaller customers, particularly in Brazil and the United States.

·A professional agronomic sales team that focuses on individually-tailoredindividually‑tailored agronomic consulting to customers based on an analysis of the differenttheir specific combination of agricultural products and growing conditions of each particular customer.conditions.

·Phosphate Solutions segment is the only fully integrated global producer of downstream phosphate-based products and its geographical diversification provides a competitive advantage in logistics, as a supplier to global food companies.
·As a result of the acquisition of YPH, the partnershipJV in China, ICL has the ability to build an integrative phosphate platform by means of operating it as a single unit togetherin China with its operating platform in Israel. As a result, ICLbetter access to the Chinese market. In addition, Phosphate Solutions segment enjoys a competitive cost advantage with respect to its phosphate activities due to access to low-costlow‑cost phosphate rock with long-termlong‑term reserves, as well as low-costlow‑cost green phosphoric acid.

Raw Materials and Suppliers

ICL

Phosphate Solutions segment produces most of the raw materials it uses for the production of its commodities and specialties products.
The segment produces phosphate that isrock as the primary raw material it uses in the manufacturing process, throughfor its backward integrated value chain, commencing from mining operationsof phosphate rock in Israel and China, as discussed further below. See “Item 4. Information onthrough production of green phosphoric acid and up to the Company—D. Property, Plantsproduction of phosphate-based fertilizers, pure phosphoric acid and Equipment—Mineral Extraction and Mining Operations” for further information on the Company's mining operations.

specialty phosphate.

The primary raw materials acquired from external sources are mainly sulfursulphur, ammonia, different grades of pure phosphoric acid and amonia.caustic soda.
Sulphur prices increased during most of 2018 but started to moderate from November 2018. Average sulphur prices in 2018 (bulk crushed lump and gran CFR price China) were $154 per tonne, compared to $122 per tonne in 2017 and compared to $126 currently (according to CRU - Fertilizer Week Historical Prices, February 7, 2019). Market observers are forecasting that the downward trend will continue during the first half of 2019, mainly due to the weakening of the phosphates market.    
During the fourth quarter of 2017, towards the expected termination of the long-term contract for the supply of pure phosphoric acid with the supplier Nutrien at the end of 2018, the Company signed a new contract with Nutrien which guarantees regular supply of this raw material through December 31, 2025. The Company holdsterms of the new contract will result in a modest margin reduction; however, ICL expects that most of the margin reduction will be recovered via market pricing actions and/or cost reductions in other areas.
74

For the dairy protein business, securing organic quality raw materials (whole milk, skimmed milk and whey) is a key element of the operations. In order to secure the supply, there are long term agreements in place with all major suppliers, which are valid for the next 1–3 years.
Phosphate Solutions segment maintains inventories of sulfur,sulphur, phosphate ammoniarock, green phosphoric acid and other raw materials in quantities that take into account the projected level of production based on consumption characteristics, supply dates,times, distance from suppliers and other logistical considerations.

During 2016, Sulfur prices (FOB price VANCOUVER) were on average $83.9 per tonne, compared to $139 per tonne in 2015. This decline continued the downtrend that started in early 2015 and support the Company’s cost production. For additional information, see “Item 5.A - Operating Results”.

Sales, Marketing and Distribution

The Phosphate Solutions segment sells and markets its products worldwide. The primary markets of ICL Phosphatephosphate commodities products are Europe, China, Brazil, India, the United States and Turkey. ICL Phosphate sellsspecialties products are primarily marketed to industrial, food and commercial customers in Europe, North America, South America and Asia. The marketing network is based mainly on an extensive internal marketing and sales organization and, to a lesser extent, on external distributors and sales agents. 
The Phosphate Solutions segment extends credit terms to its fertilizer products primarily via a networkcustomers according to the customary practice in their locations. The segment's sales are generally covered by trade credit risk insurance or by letters of its own sales offices as well as sales agents throughout the world.

credit from banks with high credit ratings.

Most of the segment's sales of ICL Phosphatedo not take place according to long‑term orders or contracts but are not made by means of contracts or long-term orders but, rather, through current orders proximateregularly ordered close to the supply date.time of supply. Accordingly, ICL Phosphate’s does not have athere is no significant orders' backlog.

The Phosphate Solutions segment ships its products from Israel to customers overseas by ships (mainly in bulk) that it leases in the global marine transportation market, which are loaded by using designated facilities in the ports of Ashdod on the Mediterranean Sea and Eilat on the Red Sea. The segment also has special port facilities for bulk loading in Amsterdam (the Netherlands) and Ludwigshafen (Germany). YPH JV sells most of its products in China and is preparing to provide a logistical solution to marine shipping outside China when it will be required.
The prices of phosphate-based fertilizers are determined in negotiations between the manufacturers and the customers and are affected mainly by the relationship between the market demand and the available supply at that date as well as the size of the customer and the period of the agreement. Prices for relatively long-termlong‑term contracts are not necessarily similar to spot prices (current/casual sales transactions).

Regarding

Most sales of the phosphate fertilizers, ICL’sspecialties products are made under agreements with terms of one or two years, or through “spot” orders placed close to the date of supply. In addition, for these products framework agreements with specific customers exist, through which the customer may purchase up to an agreed maximum quantities of products during the term, on the basis of which the customer issues purchase orders from time to time.
For purposes of marketing and selling many of its products effectively, especially food products, Technical Sales and Applications personnel work closely with customers in order to tailor the products to the customers’ needs.
75


The strategy regarding phosphate specialties products is to maximize profits by choosing whethermaintain adequate inventories to sell or store phosphate rock, fertilizer-grade phosphoric acid, phosphate fertilizers or compound fertilizers or to produce pure phosphoric acid. The inventory policy is set accordingly.

ICL Phosphate ships its products from Israelensure orderly supply to customers overseas by ship (mainly in bulk) that it leaseslight of the customers’ distance from the manufacturing locations and their demand for inventory availability, in conjunction with optimization of inventory storage costs. Therefore, portions of the market and loads using designatedfinished product inventories are held in storage facilities in the ports of Ashdod on the Mediterranean Sea and Eilat on the Red Sea. ICL Phosphate also has special port facilities for bulk loading in Amsterdam (the Netherlands) and Ludwigshafen (Germany). YPH JV sells most of its output in China, and is preparing to provide a logistical solution to marine shipping outside of China when it will be necessary to do so.

destination countries.

ICL Phosphate grants credit terms to its clients according to customary practices in their locations. ICL Phosphate’s credit sales are generally covered by trade credit risk insurance or by letters of credit from banks with high credit ratings.

Seasonality

The seasonal nature of demand for ICL Phosphate’sphosphate commodities products gives rise generally to quarterlyis usually characterized by higher sales fluctuations, as sales levels in the second and third quarters are generally higher than sales in the first and fourth quarters. In recent years, due to various influences on the timing of sales, primarily price fluctuations, the effects of seasonality explained above have been reduced as compared to earlier periods.

The target markets of phosphate specialties products are not characterized by significant seasonality. However, the fourth quarter of the year is relatively weak due to the holiday season and customers’ destocking towards the end of the year.
Natural Resources Tax

On November 30, 2015, the Knesset passed the

The Law for Taxation of Profits from Natural Resources, which entered into effect on January 1, 2016. For additional information, see Note 17 to our audited financial statements.

Specialty Solutions

The SpecialtyAudited Financial Statements.

Innovative Ag Solutions Segment includes four business lines: ICL Industrial Products, ICL Specialty Fertilizers, ICL Advanced Additives and ICL Food Specialties.
The Innovative Ag Solutions segment was established on the foundations of ICL’s specialty fertilizers business. The segment produces andaims to achieve global leadership by enhancing its global positions in its core markets a wide range of specialty products based on ICL’s integrated value chain. The segment enjoys competitive advantages from ICL’s mainstream operations, generates higher organic growth comparedagriculture, ornamental horticulture, turf and landscaping, targeting high-growth markets such as Latin America, India and China, by leveraging its unique R&D capabilities, vast agronomic experience, global footprint, backward integration to the commodity businesspotash and is less volatile. The ICL Specialty Solutions segment concentrates on achieving growth through a highly-tailored customer focus,phosphate and chemistry know-how, as well as product innovation and commercial excellence. The segment’s business lines are focused on downstream phosphate products, bromine and bromine derivatives, as well as dairy proteins serving a wide array of diversified end markets. The segment also concentrates on offering new products and solutions and, as a result, most of ICL’s R&D investments and growth CAPEX are directedseeking M&A opportunities. ICL is working to this segment, supporting the effort to constantly expand theits broad product portfolio in the segment’s business lines and to improve existing products. In addition, the segment strives to expand geographically, especially in to emerging markets.

In 2016, the total sales of the ICL Specialty Solutions segment were $3,148 million and accounted for 59% of ICL's total sales (including sales to the ICL Essential Minerals segment), while the operating income for ICL Specialty Solutions totaled $589 million, representing 63% of ICL's total operating income attributed to segments.

Specialty Fertilizers business line

ICL Specialty Fertilizers produces specialtycontrolled release fertilizers in the Netherlands and Belgium (e.g.(CRF), water soluble)soluble fertilizers (WSF), liquid fertilizers, slow release fertilizers (SRF) and soluble fertilizers in Israel and Spain, and controlled-release fertilizers in the Netherlands and the United States. ICL Specialty Fertilizers markets its products worldwide, mainly in Europe, North America and Israel.

In 2016, the total sales of ICL Specialty Fertilizers were $661 million and accounted for 21% of the Specialtystraights (MKP/MAP/Pekacid).

The Innovative Ag Solutions segment’s sales. ICL Specialty Fertilizers business line sales decreased by 3% compared to 2015, mainly due to price effects and lower demand in


Southeast Asia as well as a decline in traded products sales in Spain. These effects were offset by geographical expansion, mainly in Brazil and India, from an increase of quantities sold in traditional markets, such as, Europe and Israel, as well as a positive contribution from sales of specialty fertilizer made by the YPH joint venture in China.

ICL Specialty Fertilizerssegment develops, manufactures, markets and sells fertilizers that are based primarily on nitrogen, potash (potassium chloride) and phosphate.

It produces water soluble specialty fertilizers in Belgium and the US, liquid fertilizers and soluble fertilizers in Israel and Spain, and controlled‑release fertilizers in the Netherlands and the United States. ICL's specialty fertilizers business markets its products worldwide, mainly in Europe, Asia, North America and Israel.

The segment will also function as ICL’s innovative arm, which will seek to focus on R&D, as well as implementing digital innovation.
In 2018, the sales of the Innovative Ag Solutions segment totaled $741 million, constituting approximately 13% of ICL's total sales (including sales to other segments), an increase of 7% compared to 2017 sales. The segment operating profit totaled $57 million, constituting 6% of the total operating profit attributable to the segments. For additional information, see “Item 5 - Operating and Financial Review and Prospects— A. Operating Results— Results of Operations”.
76

Specialty fertilizers offer an improved value to the grower compared to the use of regular fertilizers.fertilizers as they are more efficient, maximize yield and quality and require lower labor costs. The following pyramid presents the different fertilizer product lines – the high-valuehigh‑value products are usually accompanied by a higher price per metric ton and lower consumption. ICL Specialty Fertilizerstonne. ICL's Innovative Ag Solutions segment produces most of the high value products, except for potassium nitrate and calcium nitrate. One of ICL Specialty Fertilizers’ strategic goals is to own a potassium nitrate plant, which will supply the Company’s captive use of the raw material and will also provide its customers with this important specialty product:

 


ICL

The Specialty Fertilizers business operates in 32 main markets:

Specialty Agriculture

This market includes high-value agricultural crops such as fruits and vegetables. Enhanced efficientefficiency fertilizers along with soluble fertilizer products are used and applied mainly in these crops. In the agriculture market forThe use of specialty fertilizers in crops such as sugar cane use of specialty fertilizers can also be beneficial – subject to climate and soil conditions. The main market for ICL Specialty Fertilizers is related to the drip irrigation/fertigation market. This market is growing as the use of drip irrigation systems is growing across the globe. The use of enhanced efficientefficiency fertilizers is growing due to their environmental and economic advantages, although thesuch growth of their use is still dependent on the price levels of the crops and the raw-material prices (e.g. urea, potassium and potassium)phosphorous).

Turf & Ornamental (T&O)
Ornamental Horticulture (OH)

The Ornamental Horticulture market consists of growers of outdoor ornamental plants (nurseries) and pot and bedding plants (greenhouses). The growers require high quality fertilization programs in order to grow plants at the quality level demandedrequired by the garden centers, DIY (Do-It-Yourself)(Do‑It‑Yourself) outlets and retail chains. ICL Specialty FertilizersThe IAS segment has a large specialized sales force, inadvising growers on the field for advising the growers in this market with respect to the optimumoptimal nutrition of the plants. ICL has a specialized distributor network. ICL Specialty Fertilizers’network in the Ornamental Horticulture market, and its main product lines infor this market are specialty fertilizers such as CRFs (controlled release fertilizers) and WSFs (water soluble fertilizers) with well-known brand names such as Osmocote, and Peters.Peters & Universol. In specific markets, such as North America and the UK, a range of unique plant protection products is also included in the proposals for growing healthy plants. In the UK, ICL is a leading company providing a total solution for the ornamental growers as it produces and markets unique, high-quality peat and growing media products.

products under the brand name Levington Advance.

Professional 77

Turf

& Landscape

The professional turf market includes the following user groups: golf coursecourses green keepers, sport fieldsfield grounds men, landscapers, and contractors.

contractors & lawn service

These groups demand high-quality inputs in order to secure strong, high-quality turf. The users require an integrated approach for preparingkeeping the turf strong and maintaining its health, without creating an environment that is conducive to the development of disease. There is a socialan environmental need to limit the inputs and, therefore, an integrated approach of unique, high-quality products is needed. The most important inputs are (specialty) fertilizers (controlled release- and slow release fertilizers), grass seeds and plant protection products. ICL offers all three product lines in its proposals.an integrated program. ICL has a dedicated and experienced team of unique professional grass experts, along with an excellenta distribution network serving its key markets, mainly in Europe and Asia.


Products

Innovation
The IAS segment will function as ICL’s innovative arm, promoting innovation, developing new products and services as well as digital platforms and technological solutions for farmers and agronomists. The segment will drive collaborations with innovative technologies and its goal is to introduce and integrate new digital solutions for the agricultural world by utilizing, among other things, external knowledge and platforms.
The ICL specialty fertilizers business has grown substantially through both organic growth and M&A. Over the past few years, the business has proven its ability to successfully integrate businesses into its existing platforms (R&D, sales & marketing, distribution channels), such as:
·
Everris, a company that manufactures and sells high‑quality controlled‑release, slow‑release and soluble fertilizers,
·
Fuentes Fertilizantes, a leading company in Spain that manufactures and distributes liquid and soluble fertilizers, NPK compounds and conventional fertilizers,
·
ICL Belgium, a manufacturer of soluble NPK fertilizer components,
·
AmegA, which develops advanced solutions for water conservation.
·
YPH in China also manufactures specialty fertilizers, contributing to the business line’s growth in Asia.
Products
Specialty fertilizers are highly effective fertilizers that allow more precise feeding of the essential foundationsplants for plant development (phosphorous, potassiumtheir major nutrients needs (nitrogen phosphorous and nitrogen)potassium) as well as secondary nutrients and micronutrients. These fertilizers allow efficient and effective fertilizing through among other things,others drip irrigation systems and foliar spraying, and help growers to obtain a larger harvest of a higher quality, despite a shortage of water sourcesyields and a limited supply of agricultural lands.quality. These fertilizers include, among others, controlled release fertilizers (CRF), slow release fertilizers (SRF), soluble fertilizers and liquid fertilizers. Specialty fertilizers allow more accurate application of the nutrients essential for plant development (phosphorus, potassium and nitrogen). These fertilizers include:

as follows:
78

·Controlled-releaseControlled‑release fertilizers (CRF), which allow accurate release of nutrients over time, and slow-release fertilizers, which allow very slow release of nutrients (nitrogen and potassium only).time. CRF’s have a special coating that allows prolonged release of nutrients (overover several weeks and up to several18 months - compared to regular fertilizers that dissolve in the soil and are available for up to four weeks).immediately available. ICL Specialty FertilizersInnovative Ag Solutions has leading global brand-name products in the world, such as, Osmocote, Agroblen and Agrocote. Osmocote is the controlled-release fertilizer most used controlled‑release fertilizers by ornamental growers worldwide. The brand is known to deliver high quality ornamental plants due to its consistent release of nutrients and unique patterned and programmed release technologies. ICL continues to invest in new technologies as well as field trials to test and proveconfirm the high qualityreliability of the release. During the past few years, ICL developed several new technologies were developed such as the “Dual Coating Technology” (which optimizes the release to ornamental plants) and the “E-Max Release Technology” (a new coating technology with improved release characteristics, mainly for urea). Furthermore, ICL is also selling slow‑release fertilizers (SRF) which, due to their low solubility and hydrolysis, release nutrients slowly (generally up to a period of 2 months). Main market for this is in the Turf and Amenity market.

·Soluble fertilizers, which are fully water-soluble,water‑soluble, and fully-solublefully‑soluble NPK compound fertilizers, are commonly used for fertilization through drip irrigation systems and foliar spraying in order to optimize fertilizer efficiency in the root zone and to maximize yields. Well-knownThese fully soluble fertilizers are also sometimes used for foliar applications. ICL's well-known brands for fertigation are Peters, Universol, Agrolution, NovaNPK and Novacid. ICL designsdevelops specific formulations for different applications and circumstances. There are specific formulations for specific crops, greenhouses and/or open fields, as well as for different water types.

·Straight fertilizersICL is also selling ‘Straight fertilizers’ which are crystalline, free-flowingfree‑flowing and high-gradehigh purity phosphorus and potassium soluble fertilizers such as MKP, MAP and PeKaCid. The purity of the products allows the elements to be absorbed and the products are also quickly soluble.PeKacid. PeKacid is the only solid highly acidifying, dry crystal water soluble fertigation product that contains both phosphorus and potassium. The product is ideal for specific water conditions allowing good absorption of the nutrientswhere an acidifying effect is required as well as keeping the dripping lines clean.

·Liquid fertilizers are used for intensive agriculture and are integrated in irrigation systems (mainly drip systems). The product line includes mostly tailor-madetailor‑made formulations designed for specific soil & water/climate conditions and crop needs.

·Peat, a growing medium for various crops, containing controlled-releasewhere generally controlled‑release fertilizers and plant-protection products.plant‑protection products are added too. Specific formulations of growing media are designed for specific plant needs, such as greenhouse bedding plants and outdoor nurseries. A well-known ICL brand is the “Levington” brand. Inclusion of growing media products in the portfolio in the UK allows ICL to offer an effective total solution to the bedding and pot plant growers and nurseries.

·Water conservation and soil conditioning products. Thisproducts is a new product line is a recent technological development of ICL.developed by ICL's IAS segment. Water conservation products are used in professional turf to optimize quality and to keep water in the root-zone. A key brand is H2Pro, which also invigorates turf health.H2Pro. These products significantly reduce irrigation requirements. This new technology is also used in agriculture to allow better water availability around the root-zone of the crops.

Over the last five years,


79

Production
ICL has acted to significantly expand its specialty fertilizer operations by completing acquisition of the following companies:

·Everris (formerly Scotts Global Pro), a multinational company, the core activity of which is the manufacture and sale of high-quality specialty fertilizers, including controlled-release, slow-release and soluble fertilizers;

·Fuentes Fertilizantes, a leading company in Spain that manufactures and distributes liquid and soluble fertilizers, NPK compounds and conventional fertilizers;

·Nu3, a manufacturer of soluble NPK fertilizer components;

·AmegA, which develops advanced solutions for saving water, preserving water and improved absorption of the fertilizer by the plant;

·YPH JV for production of phosphates in China, which also manufactures specialty fertilizers.

Production

ICL Specialty Fertilizers’Innovative Ag Solutions’ principal production facilities include its plants in Israel (special compound fertilizers, liquid fertilizers and soluble NPK fertilizers), Spain (liquid fertilizers, and soluble NPK fertilizers), the United Kingdom (products for preserving water and improving absorption of the fertilizer by the plant,conservation and peat asincorporated in growing media), China (compound specialty fertilizers and soluble fertilizers), the Netherlands (controlled-release fertilizers)(controlled‑release fertilizers and fertilizer blends), Belgium (soluble NPK fertilizers) and the United States (controlled-release(controlled‑release fertilizers).


ICL Specialty Fertilizers’Innovative Ag Solutions’ main manufacturing plants and marketing companies are set forth in the map below:

ICL Specialty Fertilizers’ currentInnovative Ag Solutions’ annual potential production capacity is approximately 300 thousand tonnes of soluble fertilizers, (including YPH JV’s production capacity), 450 thousand tonnes of liquid fertilizers, 110 thousand tonnes of controlled-releasecontrolled‑release fertilizers and 400 thousand tonnesM3 of peat. The potential production capacity of our various plants is based on the hourly output of the plants, multiplied by potential hours of operation per year. This calculation assumes continuous production over the year, 24 hours a day, with the exception of a few days for planned maintenance and renovations. Actual production is usually lower than potential production capacity, due to unexpected breakdowns, special maintenance operations, lack of availability of raw materials, market conditions and seasonality in demand.
Competition
The Specialty Fertilizers’ market conditions.

In addition, ICL Specialty Fertilizers is examining several options to build/buy a potassium nitrate production plant to enable an increase in the production of soluble fertilizers and food-grade phosphoric acid. The Company’s examination is in line with its growth strategy to meet the anticipated increased demand for soluble specialty fertilizers. Potassium nitrate is a major component in liquid and water soluble fertilizers, as well as in several other industrial applications.

Competition

The specialty fertilizers marketsize is estimated at approximately USD 8–9$13 billion per annum,year, accounting for about 4% of the total fertilizers market and. According to the Company's estimation the market is growing at aan average rate of 4–5%about 6% per year.

The Specialty Fertilizers market is diversified, with a few global companies and many small to medium-size local producers. The market operates mainly on a local basis and most producers sell their products in nearby territories rather than globally. ICL Specialty FertilizersICL’s specialty fertilizers business may be considered one of the largest global players in the specialty fertilizers market with production plants in Israel, Netherlands, Belgium, Spain, the UK, the USA and China.

80

The Capex needed for new production capacities is not considered high compared to the commodity fertilizers market. Nevertheless, in order for a new player to enter this market


with different product groups, extensive knowledge is needed – both of chemical production and of agronomical know-how, as well as customer support capabilities. ICL Specialty Fertilizers focuses and relies on a worldwide experienced R&D team, allowing it to stay significantly ahead of the competition in many of the specialty-fertilizers product lines, especially regarding controlled-released fertilizers,in the controlled-release, water soluble fertilizers and liquid fertilizers.fertilizers markets. ICL Specialty Fertilizers provides stronghigh-level professional support to customers by means of an experienced and professional marketing and agronomist team havingteams with strong contactscustomer relationships that have been developed over decades of service, and through the offer of an extensive product portfolio.

The company profile of the market players in the Specialty Fertilizers market is highly diverse.

Other

Besides ICL, other companies globally active in the specialty fertilizers market are: SQM, Yara, Haifa &Chemicals and Compo. More regional or even in a specific country are: AgriumOther companies such as Nutrien and Koch (USA), Produquimica (Brazil) and Kingenta (China).

are regional players. 

ICL believes that ICL Specialty Fertilizersspecialty fertilizers business benefits from the following competitive advantages:

·A strong, efficient and integrated supply chain set-up integrated with in-house access to high quality raw materials, such as phosphate and potash.

·Efficient supply chainpotash, which is based on thean extensive product portfolio and multi-location production.

·Unique R&D and product development activities, creating a strong platform for future growth in controlled-release fertilizers, fertigation, foliar solubles,soluble fertilizers, enhanced nutrients, water efficiency and Innovativeinnovative next generation products.

·Added value production process technology – custom-made formulations to meet our customerscustomers’ unique needs.

·Highly skilled global agronomic sales team providing professional advice and consultation.consultation and Distributor loyalty.

·Integrated and specifically tailored services based on the customer’s needs.

·Full product portfolio (one-stop shopping)shop).

·Distributor loyalty.

·ICL’s brands are well-known asand leading trademarks.brands.  

Raw Materials and Suppliers

The primary raw materials acquired from external sources are mainly KNO3,KNO3, SOP, ammonia, NPK granules, Urea, KOH and coating materials.

On March 1, 2017, the District Court in Haifa (Israel) decided that the ammonia tank operated by Haifa Chemicals must be emptied no later than April 1, 2017, and that ships transporting ammonia are forbidden to enter into Israel’s seaports. In addition, the Court determined that up to the time the ammonia tank is emptied, as stated above, Haifa Chemicals will supply the ammonia needs of Fertilizers and Chemical Ltd (F&C), including the needs of F&C’s customers. Ammonia is a raw material used for various purposes by ICL’s Specialty Fertilizers and Bromine business lines,Innovative Ag Solutions, and is also sold to external customers as an end product and/or as ammonia derivatives. As atDuring 2017, the date ofCompany started to import ammonia in tanks and other nitric raw materials as alternative for ammonia imports in vessels until better alternatives will be approved by the report, the CompanyIsraeli Authorities. Where needed, ICL Innovative Ag Solutions is examining the consequencesproduction alternatives of the Court’s decision, as stated, and possible alternatives for acquiring ammonia.business-line in order to ensure continuous supply to the end customers. The anticipatedtotal impact on the Company’s business results is not expectedmaterial. During 2018, the Company used isotanks to be material.

import ammonia for the production of all the required products and ammonia derivatives. During the year, imported ammonia costs decreased, mainly by optimizing supplier portfolio.

81

ICL Specialty Fertilizersspecialty fertilizers business endeavors to hold inventories of the above raw materials in quantities that take into account the projected level of production based on consumption characteristics, supply dates, distance from suppliers and other logistical considerations.


Sales, Marketing and Distribution

The primary markets of the Specialty Fertilizers business line are the USA and Europe, particularly Spain and Israel, China, the Far East,Asia, Australia and Brazil. The Specialty Fertilizers business line sells its fertilizer products primarily via a network of its own sales offices as well as sales agents throughout the world.

In general, the business model relies on brand-name, premium specialty products which are marketed by a strong agronomist sales network at the end-userend‑user level, while the sales are invoiced through distributor-partners which often distribute the products in an exclusive (or semi-exclusive) way.exclusively or semi-exclusively. The technical sales force emphasizes the agronomic advantages of the specialty products to the end users (farmers, growers of containerized plants, golf courses, etc.) and provides advice to and training of distributor sales representatives and end users.

representatives.

Most of the specialty fertilizers business sales are not made by means of contracts or long-termlong‑term orders but, rather, through current orders made close to the supply date. Accordingly, there is no significant orders’ backlog.

The prices of the fertilizers sold

Prices are determined via negotiations between ICL and theits customers and are affected mainly by the relationship between market demand and ICL’sthe business line’s production cost, as well as by the size of the customer and termterms of the agreement.

During 2016, even though the prices

ICL Innovative Ag Solutions grants credit terms to its customers according to customary practices in their respective locations. ICL Innovative Ag Solutions credit sales are generally covered by trade credit risk insurance or by letters of most of the products declined, mainly as a result of a decrease in the prices of raw materials, ICL Specialty Fertilizers was able to increase the profit marginscredit from 2015, albeit at a lower sales level.

banks with high credit ratings.

Seasonality

The stronger sales season for Specialty Fertilizers is the first half of the year. The use and application of the fertilizers is related to the main growing seasons of the specialty crops around the globe. The main factors impacting seasonality are geographical location, type of crop, product and market. The key markets for ICL Specialty Fertilizers tend to be located in the Northern hemisphere: USA, Europe and particularly the countries Spain and Israel.

As an example, some specialty products, such as soluble fertilizers in the Ornamental Horticulture market are sold and applied throughout the entire year whilewith limited seasonality, whereas controlled release fertilizers are sold during the potting season of container nursery stock and pot-plantspot‑plants (before spring time).

Advanced Additives business line

ICL’s Advanced Additives business line primarily develops, produces, markets


82

Corporate Responsibility, Sustainability and sells a broad range of acids, specialty phosphates and specialty minerals for various applications in a large number of industries, including metal and water treatment, paints and coatings, forest fire retardants, cleaning materials, oral hygiene, carbonated drinks, asphalt modification, de-icing, nutrition, pharma, specialty steel, fuel additives and rubber. The diverse products and market base supports and is consistent with the Company’s strategy of increasing production of downstream products with higher added value. This business line purifies some of the agricultural phosphoric acid manufactured by ICL Phosphate and also manufactures thermal phosphoric acid. The purified phosphoric acid and the thermal

Donations

phosphoric acid are used to manufacture downstream products with high added value – phosphate salts and acids – which are used in the various industries mentioned above. The product line of ICL Advanced Additives is further comprised of processed potassium, calcium and magnesium products used in the pharma, specialty steel, oil drilling, and oil additives industries, along with de-icing and other applications.

In 2016, the total sales of ICL Advanced Additives were $966 million and accounted for 31% of the Specialty Solutions segment’s sales.

Sales of ICL Advanced Additives in 2016 increased by $21 million (or 2%), compared to 2015. The increase stemmed mainly from acid sales, especially in Europe, as well as increased demand for fire safety retardants from U.S. government agencies. Additionally, the specialty minerals business improved compared to 2015, which was impacted by strike effects in Israel.

Approximately 50% of ICL Advanced Additives external sales in 2016 were of phosphoric acid of various grades (technical, food, electronics and polyphosphoric acid), phosphate salts and related specialties, similar to 2015. Phosphoric acids and the downstream phosphates are produced in part using phosphate rock ICL mines in its facilities in Israel and China. Phosphoric acid is manufactured from that phosphate rock, and from elemental phosphorus (P4) purchased from third parties. ICL also purchases phosphoric acid from third parties.

Demand for ICL Advanced Additives products is affected by the global economic situation, competition in the target markets, and price fluctuations in the fertilizer markets, which affect the price of the main raw materials of this business line.

Over the last three years, ICL Advanced Additives business line expanded its operations by means of acquisition of the following activities and companies:

In April 2014, ICL acquired Auxquimia S.A., a Spanish company that produces firefighting foams and fire extinguishment additives. Auxquimia serves markets from its production facility in Asturias, Spain. The acquisition marks ICL’s entry into the Class B foam business. Auxquimia’s Class B foam products, incorporating the latest surfactant technology, are used to fight flammable liquid fires, such as refinery or jet fuel fires, and they are among the world’s safest, most effective and environmentally friendly firefighting products. These products complement ICL’s Class A foam products which are used to fight structural fires. The acquisition expands ICL Advanced Additives’ market presence in southern Europe and also provides new products to ICL’s North American portfolio. Sales growth is ahead of plan. Expected synergies related to the production of Class A foam for the European and Australian markets are proceeding better than expected by reducing costs associated with third-party production tolling. The qualification of Class B foam products in North America is on schedule.

During the fourth quarter of 2014, ICL completed acquisition of 100% of Fosbrasil (increase in the rate of holdings from 44.25% to 100%), the leading manufacturer in Latin America of purified phosphoric acid for the food and specialty fertilizer market, and a producer of phosphate-based downstream products and specialty fertilizers. The acquisition expanded ICL Advanced Additives’ global WPA portfolio into South America and has contributed to the operational efficiencies stemming from the overall integration. The profitability of the product portfolio has proven to be incremental to the base margin. Despite the difficult economic environment in Brazil and the competitive nature of imports into Brazil, WPA domestic sales experienced favorable growth.


In 2015, ICL completed establishment of the YPH joint venture, which is engaged in rock mine and phosphate operations. YPH JV operates an integrated phosphate platform across the entire value chain. The YPH JV contributed $48 million to the Advanced Additives business line’s sales in 2016.

Products

ICL Advanced Additives products are designed for a wide range of uses and industries. The main markets of this business line include metallurgy, paints and coatings, electronics, construction, oil additives and firefighting.

ICL Advanced Additives is comprised of sub-business lines: Industrial Specialties, Acids, Fire Safety, Oil Additives (P2S5), Elemental Phosphorus and Specialty Minerals.

ICL Advanced Additives supplies phosphate salts and phosphoric acid, which are used in the metal treatment, paints and coatings, and beverages industries, along with and a variety of other industries. The business line supplies P2S5, a key ingredient in lubricating oil additives and insecticides. In addition, ICL is one of the world’s leading manufacturers of phosphate-based fire retardant products, which are used primarily to fight forest fires via aerial application. Further, ICL Advanced Additives manufactures and supplies specialty minerals, such as, pure potash and minerals from the Dead Sea for de-icing, oil drilling, and the pharmaceutical industry. At other facilities the business line produces specialty magnesium and calcium products used in pharmaceuticals, specialty steel treatment, the paper industry, fuel and oil additives and a variety of other applications.

A minor portion of ICL Advanced Additives products are based on its intellectual property and have well-known brand names mainly in the markets of fire retardants and paint and coatings, for example, Phos Chek™. ICL’s ability to provide a high level of service and expand into new markets in the firefighting sector has enabled it to achieve a leadership position in the market.

Production

ICL Advanced Additives manufactures its products in its facilities in Germany, the United States, Israel, Brazil, France, Spain, China, and Mexico. In Mishor Rotem in Israel, this business line manufactures purified phosphoric acid by purifying fertilizer grade phosphoric acid produced by ICL Phosphate. In addition, the business line manufactures technical grade purified phosphoric acid in Kunming, China. ICL Advanced Additives also manufactures thermal phosphoric acid in the United States by utilizing elemental phosphorous and purchases purified phosphoric acid from third parties. ICL Advanced Additives in Brazil produces purified phosphoric acid from raw materials shipped from ICL Phosphate from its Israel production site as well as raw materials purchased from external parties.


ICL Advanced Additives’ principal manufacturing plants, distribution centers and marketing companies are set forth in the map below:

In 2016, ICL Advanced Additives produced approximately 207 thousand tonnes of purified phosphoric acid (as Phosphorus Pentoxide), 312 thousand tonnes of phosphate salts, and 65 thousand tonnes of other phosphate based products (P2S5 and Fire Safety). In addition, approximately 38 thousand tonnes of magnesia products and 282 thousand tonnes of Dead Sea Salts were produced.

The maximum annual capacity of ICL Advanced Additives is approximately 346 thousand tonnes of purified phosphoric acid (as Phosphorus Pentoxide), 385 thousand tonnes of phosphate salts, 154 thousand tonnes of other phosphate based products (P2S5 and Fire Safety), 60 thousand tonnes of magnesia, and 480 thousand tonnes of Dead Sea Salts at the Advanced Additives business line. The capacity of Magnesium and Calcium specialties is approximately 12 thousand tonnes.

Competition

ICL Advanced Additives has a leading position in the field of purified phosphoric acid and its downstream products. The competitors of ICL Advanced Additives are large and mid-size international chemical companies, which have manufacturing and marketing presences in various countries, as well as local companies serving local markets. In every field, many companies compete with ICL Advanced Additives by offering similar products or substitutes.

The competitiveness of ICL Advanced Additives centers on product features, price, quality, service and the ability to address the customers’ needs.

·The primary competitors of ICL Advanced Additives are Chemische Fabrik Budenheim KG, Innophos Inc., Prayon S.A, PotashCorp, Haifa Chemicals Ltd., various Chinese producers, ChemTrade Logistics Company in North America, and Italmatch Chemicals in Europe.

Raw Materials and Suppliers

The primary raw material for manufacture of phosphate salts is purified phosphoric acid, which is produced by purifying fertilizer grade phosphoric acid as well as via a thermal process from elemental phosphorus (P4). ICL Advanced Additives obtains fertilizer grade phosphoric acid from ICL Phosphate and also purchases P4 and purified phosphoric acid from external manufacturers.

ICL Advanced Additives has a long-term supply contract with a supplier of phosphoric acid that guarantees regular supply of this raw material until 2018. In addition, there is a long-term supply agreement for P4 with another supplier.

Besides purified phosphoric acid, ICL Advanced Additives uses several dozen other raw materials, which it purchases from many suppliers. Of these, the raw material with the greatest total cost is caustic soda.

ICL Advanced Additives maintains raw-material inventories in quantities that take into account the expected level of production based on consumption characteristics, supply times, distance from suppliers, and other logistical considerations.

Sales, Marketing and Distribution

ICL Advanced Additives sells its products mainly to industrial and commercial customers in Europe, North America, South America and Asia. The marketing network of ICL Advanced Additives is based primarily on an extensive internal marketing and sales organization and, to a lesser extent, on external distributors and selling agents. ICL Advanced Additives is not dependent on external marketing agents.

Most of ICL Advanced Additives sales are made under agreements with terms of one or two years, or through “spot” orders placed close to the date of supply. In addition, ICL Advanced Additives has framework agreements with specific customers, through which the customer may purchase up to previously agreed maximum quantities of products during the term, on the basis of which the customer issues purchase orders to ICL Advanced Additives from time to time.

Most sales of ICL Advanced Additives are not based on long-term orders or contracts. Consequently, the concept of a backlog is not of significance for ICL Advanced Additives.

ICL Advanced Additives strategy is to maintain adequate inventories to ensure orderly supply to customers in light of the customers’ distance from the manufacturing locations and their demand for inventory availability, and in conjunction with optimization of inventory’s storage costs. Therefore, portions of finished product inventories are held in storage facilities in the destination countries.

ICL Advanced Additives extends credit terms to its clients according to customary practices in their locations. The business line sales are generally covered by trade credit risk insurance or by letters of credit from banks with high credit ratings.


Seasonality

The target markets of most of ICL Advanced Additives products are not characterized by seasonality, except for fire safety products and mineral salts for de-icing.

While sales volume for fire safety products is higher in the spring and summer due to the many fires in North America during this hot and dry period, salts for de-icing are characterized by relatively higher sales in the first and fourth quarter. In general, the fourth quarter of the year is relatively weak due to the holiday season and customers’ destocking towards the end of the year.

Food Specialties business line

ICL Food Specialties is a leader in developing and producing functional food ingredients and phosphate additives, which provide texture and stability solutions for the processed meat, fish, dairy, beverage and baked goods markets. In addition, the business line produces milk and whey proteins for the food ingredients industry and provides blended, integrated solutions based on dairy proteins and phosphate additives. The business line operates primary production locations in Germany and Austria, which mainly process phosphates, milk and spices, and runs several local blending facilities in Germany, the UK, the United States, Brazil, China and Australia, enabling the production of "customer specific" solutions that meet the requirements of the local market.

In 2016, the total sales of ICL Food Specialties were $659 million and accounted for 21% of the Specialty Solutions segment’s sales.

ICL Food Specialties sales in 2016 increased by $46 million, or an increase of 8% compared to 2015. The increase stemmed mainly from successful utilization of the increased production capacity in the business line’s primary production plant in Austria. Sales of new products and tailor-made customer solutions contributed strongly to the business line’s net sales growth. Another major business driver was the geographical expansion of selling activities into new regions (e.g. India & Africa).

The impacts referred to above were partly offset by a reduction in Base Business (single ingredient phosphate additives) volumes to Russia due to a change of the Company’s distribution partner, and in North America, where the business line faced increased competition. Furthermore, net sales were negatively impacted by the strong upward revaluation of the US dollar versus other currencies (e.g., the euro, British pound, and Mexican peso). ICL Food Specialties business line is part of the strategy of manufacturing downstream products with higher added value based on phosphate rock and milk.

Approximately 67% of ICL Food Specialties’ business line’s external sales in 2016 were downstream products of phosphoric acid, compared to 73% in 2015. The decrease is driven by the increased portion of the backward integrated dairy protein business (general change in the product mix) and by the unfavorable impacts described above. Downstream phosphates are produced in part using phosphate rock that is mined by our upstream segment and phosphoric acid manufactured from that phosphate rock, or phosphoric acid which is purchased from third parties.

Demand for most of the products of ICL Food Specialties is affected by the global economic situation and competition in our target markets.


Overall sales volume grew mainly as a result of further investments in the production capacity of the dairy protein sub-business line acquired in 2015. Food Specialties markets continue to be receptive to innovative product concepts which offer improved health and convenience characteristics while maintaining favorable texture and stability features. The continued financial crisis in Russia and the weak ruble is negatively impacting demand in that market.

Over the last three years, ICL Food Specialties expanded its operations by means of acquisition of the following activities and companies:

In 2014, acquisition was completed of the Hagesud Group, a German producer of premium spice blends and food additives for meat processing. This transaction included acquisition of all the operating assets of the Germany based Hemmingen company, including Hagesud’s production sites, existing businesses, state of the art production technology and warehouse facilities located in Hemmingen, Dortmund and Ottensoos, Germany, with approximately 200 employees. The acquisition was integrated with our legacy spice business.

In 2015, the Company completed acquisition of Prolactal GmbH and its subsidiary, Rovita, GmbH (collectively “Prolactal”). Prolactal, the plants of which are based in Hartberg, Austria and in Engelsberg, Germany, is a leading European producer of dairy proteins and other ingredients for the food and beverage industries. Prolactal has approximately 200 employees. The acquisition complements the long-term strategy of ICL Food Specialties by contributing whey protein products to the portfolio. Sales grew by 41% over 2015 and profitability by 44% as a result of an improved product mix and operational efficiencies.

In 2015, ICL completed the formation of the YPH joint venture (China’s phosphate producer). The previously existing YBKGT Food business was integrated into the new YPH JV. The YPH JV contributed $9 million to the ICL Food Specialties’ business line’s sales in 2016.

Products

ICL Food Specialties’ products are designed for a wide range of uses in the food industry. The main markets of ICL Food Specialties include food ingredients and phosphate additives which provide texture and stability solutions for the processed meat, fish, dairy and baked goods food markets. In addition, the business line produces milk proteins and whey proteins for the food ingredients industry. The Company also produces solutions based on a combination of proteins and phosphate additives. ICL Food Specialties is part of the strategy of manufacturing downstream products with higher added value based on phosphate rock and milk.

ICL Food Specialties is comprised of sub-business lines: Food Phosphates and Multi-Ingredient Blends, Dairy Proteins and Spices.

ICL Food Specialties uses much of the phosphate salts (produced by ICL Advanced Additives) as a raw material for manufacture of food additives in many countries in the world.

A significant portion of ICL Food Specialties’ products are based on its intellectual property and have well-known brand names in their relevant markets, including FIBRISOL®, BRIFISOL®, JOHA®, TARI®, NUTRIFOS®, BENEPHOS®, BEKAPLUS®, ROVITARIS®, LEVONA® and LEVN-LITE®.


ICL Food Specialties’ highly sophisticated technology platform for the development of food texture and stability solutions has allowed it to develop expertise in phosphate-based food additives and significant know-how in protein management.

Production

ICL Food Specialties operates primary production locations in Germany and Austria which mostly process phosphates, milk and spices. ICL Food Specialties runs several local blending facilities in Germany, UK, the United States, Brazil, China and Australia, which enable it to produce customer-specific solutions meeting the requirements of the local market.

ICL Food Specialties’ principal manufacturing plants, blending units, distribution centers and marketing companies are set forth in the map below:

In 2016, ICL Food Specialties produced 88 thousand tonnes of food additive blends as well as 43 thousand tonnes of milk derivatives. In addition, ICL Food Specialties utilizes the primary production plant ICL Advanced Additives to the extent of 111 thousand tonnes of phosphate salts sold directly to the market. The maximum annual production capacity of ICL Food Specialties gives it the ability to increase, or even double, some of the production.

Production and capacity of food additives and milk derivatives increased from the prior year due to completion of investments in new plants and equipment in Prolactal and Rovita.

Competition

ICL Food Specialties has a leading position in the field of food grade phosphates, as well as in the dairy proteins area. ICL Food Specialties competitors are large and mid-size international companies serving the food industry, which have manufacturing and marketing presences in various countries, as well as local companies that reap the benefits of being local manufacturers in a regional market.


The competitiveness of ICL Food Specialties centers on product features, price, quality, service and the ability to address customers’ needs.

The primary competitors in our phosphate-based sub-business line are Chemische Fabrik Budenheim KG, Innophos Inc., Prayon, Adithya Birla, Haifa Chemicals Ltd., FOSFA and various Chinese producers.

Significant competitors exist in the dairy protein sub-business line including Bayrische Milchindustrie, Arla, Fonterra, Milei, Lactoprot and Sachsenmilch. Competitiveness is primarily determined by access to raw materials, supply chains and technologic know-how.

Raw Materials and Suppliers

The main raw material for manufacture of phosphate-based food additives is purified phosphoric acid. ICL Food Specialties acquires phosphate salts internally from ICL Advanced Additives, which purifies fertilizer grade phosphoric acid obtained from ICL Phosphate and also purchases purified phosphoric acid from external manufacturers.

ICL Food Specialties in the US has a long-term supply contract with a supplier of purified phosphoric acid that guarantees regular supply of this raw material.

For the ICL Food Specialties’ dairy protein sub-business line, securing organic quality raw materials (whole milk, skimmed milk and whey) is a key element of the operations. In order to secure the supply, there are long term agreements in place with all major suppliers, which are valid for the next 1–3 years.

In addition to phosphate salts and milk/whey, ICL Food Specialties uses hundreds of other raw materials, which it purchases from many suppliers.

ICL Food Specialties maintains raw material inventories in quantities that take into account the expected level of production based on consumption characteristics, supply times, distance from suppliers, and other logistical considerations.

Sales, Marketing and Distribution

ICL Food Specialties sells its products mainly to customers in Europe, North America, South America and Asia. The marketing network is based primarily on an extensive internal marketing organization and, to a lesser extent, on external distributors and selling agents.

For purposes of marketing and selling many of its products effectively, ICL Food Specialties’ marketing personnel work closely with customers in order to tailor the products to the customers’ needs. ICL Food Specialties is not dependent on external marketing agents.

Most sales of ICL Food Specialties do not take place according to long-term orders or contracts, but are regularly ordered close to the time of supply. Consequently, the concept of an orders’ backlog is not relevant to ICL Food Specialties. In addition, ICL Food Specialties has framework agreements with specific customers, through which the customer may purchase up to previously agreed maximum quantities of products during the term.

ICL Food Specialties’ strategy is to maintain adequate inventories to ensure orderly supply to customers in light of their distance from the manufacturing locations and their demand for inventory availability, and also to optimize inventory storage costs. Therefore, portions of the finished product inventories are held in storage facilities in the destination countries.


ICL Food Specialties grants credit terms to its customers according to customary practices in their locations. The majority of ICL Food Specialties’ sales are covered by trade credit risk insurance or by letters of credit from banks with high credit ratings.

Seasonality

The target markets of most of ICL Food Specialties products are not characterized by significant seasonality.

Industrial Products business line

ICL Industrial Products produces bromine out of a solution that is created as a by-product of the potash production process in Sodom, Israel, as well as bromine-based compounds. ICL Industrial Products uses most of the bromine it produces for self-production of bromine compounds at production sites in Israel, the Netherlands and China. In addition, ICL Industrial Products is engaged in the production and marketing of phosphorous flame retardants and additional phosphorus based-products.

In 2016, the total sales of ICL Industrial Products were $953 million and represented 30% of the Specialty Solutions segment’s sales. The sales of the ICL Industrial Products business line increased by 9% compared to 2015. For additional information see “Item 5.A - Operating Results”.

Bromine is a member of the halogen family that is known for its diverse uses in many industries. Based on a study conducted in 2014 at Vanderbilt University among 92 naturally occurring chemical elements, bromine falls within a class of 28 chemical elements that are essential for human life. Bromine is used in the production of a range of bromine compounds. Bromine is found naturally in seawater, underground brine deposits and the Dead Sea. The concentration of bromine varies depending upon its source. The method for extracting bromine depends on the nature of its source and its concentration. The lower the concentration of bromine in the brines, the more difficult and expensive it is to extract.

The Dead Sea is the world’s major source of bromine and the concentration of salts in the Dead Sea is significantly higher than the concentration in ordinary seawater. Although there are other sources of bromine around the world, about half of the global supply comes from the Dead Sea.

The operations of ICL Industrial Products are largely affected by the level of activity in the electronics, construction, automotive, oil drilling, furniture, pharmaceutical, agro, textile and water treatment markets. In 2016, 41% of worldwide use of bromine was for flame retardants, 30% was for intermediates and industrial uses, 16% was for clear brine solutions, 7% was for water treatment, and 6% was for other uses.

Products

ICL Industrial Products focuses on two main sub-business lines:

Flame retardants –bromine-, phosphorus- and magnesia-based products are used in electronics, building and construction, automotive, mass transportation, textile and furnishing applications throughout the world. Flame retardants are added to plastics, textiles and other combustible material to inhibit, suppress, or delay fire or flames and to prevent the spread of fire.


Industrial solutions – this activity area manufactures and supplies elemental bromine products for a range of uses in the chemical industry, as well as the bromine and phosphorous compounds used in a number of industries worldwide, such as: rubber, pharmaceuticals, agro, polyester fibers (in production of plastic fabrics and bottles) and clear brine solutions used for balancing pressure in the oil and gas drilling industry. In addition, this area includes bromine-based biocides used for treating industrial water.

The following table sets forth the principal products of ICL Industrial Products, as well as their primary applications and primary end-markets:



Product
Primary ApplicationPrimary End-Markets
Bromine, Phosphorus and Magnesia -Based Flame Retardants

Additives used in plastic production

Electronics, automotive, mass transportation, building and construction, furniture and textiles
Elemental BromineChemical reagent and rubber componentTire manufacturing, pharmaceuticals and agro
Phosphorus-Based Industrial CompoundsFire resistant fluids in turbine & power generation hydraulics and phosphorous-based inorganic intermediatesPower plants and agro
Organic Bromine CompoundsInsecticides, solvents for chemical synthesis and chemical intermediatesPharmaceuticals and agro
Clear BrinesOil and gas drillingsOil and gas
MerquelMercury emission control

Emission control in coal-fired power plants

Bromine-Based Biocides

Water treatment and disinfection

Swimming pools, spa facilities, cooling towers, paper plants and oil and gas drillings.

Flame retardants: The trend of pressure exerted by “green” organizations in the area of environmental protection to reduce the use of bromine-based flame retardants is continuing. On the other hand, the development and commercialization of new sustainable polymeric and reactive bromine-based flame retardants along with regulation in additional countries are serving to increase the use of these products. The worldwide economic slowdown, in general, and in China, in particular, over the past several years has triggered a slowdown in the demand for products in the electronics and construction industries. During 2015 and into 2016, there was stabilization in the demand for products used in printed circuit boards and other electronic applications. In addition, an increase in demand for electronic applications in automotive application is creating an improvement in demand and price increases were recorded. Prices of bromine compounds were also supported by an increase in elemental bromine prices in China.

Phosphorous-based flame retardants were adversely impacted by the weakening of the euro against the dollar as well as by tougher competition from the Chinese manufacturers. However, as of the fourth quarter of 2016, this trend was offset due to an increase in raw-material prices in China and repeated supply interruptions that some Chinese producers encountered due to stricter environmental regulations.

Elemental bromine: In 2016, there was a moderate increase in elemental bromine prices in the United States, Europe and India. In China, prices increased significantly, continuing the trend of the second half of 2015.


Clear brine solutions: Following the continued low level of oil prices in 2016, the demand in the market for clear brine solutions for oil and gas drilling was relatively low compared to previous years.

Biocides:The low oil and gas prices in 2016 impacted the demand for biocides used for gas drilling. However, a new regulation in Europe (in-force since September 2015) allowing only registered producers of biocides to supply the market, the demand for the Company’s products increased.

Inorganic bromides: As of April 2016, the new regulations for Mercury emission control in the US are fully effective, meaning that all coal power plants are required to comply with the rules. This continued the trend of increasing demand in the market for inorganic bromides for neutralizing mercury (Merquel® products).

In addition, there was a moderate increase in demand for additional bromine-based products as a result of improving demand in the agrochemicals markets.

Phosphorous-based industrial compounds: Overall stable demand following GDP growth. In developing countries, the growth is higher than the GDP due to the increase in electricity generation.

Organic bromine compounds: Overall stable demand following GDP growth and the agrochemical demand.

ICL Industrial Products also develops innovative products and new applications for existing products. The new products introduced in recent years include, among others, Merquel® (inorganic bromides for neutralization of mercury), FR122P flame retardant (a polymeric bromine-based flame retardant used in insulation material in the construction industry), TexFRon®(a polymeric flame retardant product for textiles), FR-1410 (a bromine-based flame retardant used in electronics & electricity, building & construction and other applications), Fyrol® HF-10 (a phosphorus-based flame retardant for polyurethane foam), energy storage (wide range of products to bromine-based flow batteries) and SaFRon® 6605 (a phosphorus- and bromine-based flame retardant for rigid polyurethane spray foam for insulation systems in the construction industry).

Merquel®:The UNEP Global Mercury Partnership is an entity dedicated to protecting human health and the environment from the impacts of mercury and to reducing its release on a global basis. The Partnership initiated the global Minamta treaty and is carrying on international negotiations for establishing a legally binding agreement regarding mercury emissions. In the U.S., a law was passed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) requiring significant reduction of mercury emissions in the United States and since April 2016 all the utilities must comply with the new limits. Concurrently, the United States is continuing to incentivize reductions in mercury emissions by providing tax credits. The Merquel® product line, launched by ICL Industrial Products at the end of 2008, is based on inorganic bromides, which when integrated with certain technologies is designed to enable efficient neutralization of mercury to the limits determined by the authorities (a 90%


reduction in mercury emissions). The Industrial Products business line has invested in an extensive logistics system in the United States to allow continuous supply to the United States market and is making preparations to establish the production and logistics capacity required for stable supply to this market and to other countries that will adopt similar legislation.

FR-122P Flame Retardant: In January 2012, ICL Industrial Products signed a licensing agreement with Dow Global Technologies LLC, a subsidiary of the Dow Chemical Company, to use certain of its patents and know-how to produce an innovative polymeric bromine-based flame retardant for expanded (EPS) and extruded (XPS) polystyrene foams used as insulation materials in the construction industry. This next generation flame retardant, which is marketed by ICL Industrial Products under the brand name FR-122P, constitutes a sustainable alternative for customers transitioning from the flame retardant HBCD (hexabromocyclododecane) that has been prohibited for use in the European Union since August 2015, except for authorized uses. In November 2015, a decision was made by the European authorities regarding authorization of the continued use of HBCD in the European Union, until August 2017, exclusively for EPS applications in insulation for buildings constructed by companies that filed a request for the continued use. In the meantime, in October 2016, most of the EPS producers that filed a continued use request decided to withdraw it due to the broad availability of the polymeric flame retardant.

ICL Industrial Products commercially produces FR-122P at its plants in Israel and the Netherlands with a combined annual capacity of 12,500 metric tons. In February 2016, ICL Industrial Products and Albemarle Corporation signed a long-term agreement for the supply of polymeric flame retardants to Albemarle from ICL’s plants in Israel and the Netherlands.

TexFRon®:In 2015, ICL began to sell TexFRon® 4002, a polymeric flame retardant product for textiles developed as part of the R&D activities of ICL Industrial Products. TexFRon® 4002, which is designed to provide high-level fire retardant solutions for textile and adhesive products, is an effective substitute for DECA (which will be prohibited for use in Europe as of March 2019) and offers enhanced stability compared to other existing products. During 2015, a decision was made by Company management to discontinue the activities in the DECA facility. In December 2014, the TexFRon® 4002 polymeric product was recognized by Oekotex, a European standard for textile products. This product is the first bromine-based flame retardant that has received such recognition.

Energy storage:Bromine-based flow batteries are highly effective for storing large amounts of energy and offer important advantages compared to alternatives – they can be produced at lower cost, last longer and have greater capacity. ICL’s energy storage products were developed in order to address the developing needs deriving from the increased use of renewable energy. ICL provides a high-purity, tailor-made electrolyte solution together with a recycling process to assure that this technology is fully sustainable (in its post-use phase as well). ICL supports technology developers with its world class experts and advanced laboratories, and its bromine-based energy storage technology provides environmental and social benefits.

FR-1410:In the past few years, ICL has begun selling FR-1410, which is a bromine-based flame retardant. This flame retardant is primarily used in the electronics, construction and home appliance markets.

New Products for Polyurethane. The new products of ICL Industrial products for polyurethane include the following:


·Fyrol®HF-9, a phosphorus-based flame retardant for the furniture industry, which was developed and commercialized in response to California’s addition of TDCP, to the Proposition 65 list of substances designated by the State of California as known carcinogens. Fyrol® HF-9 represents improved resistance of flexible polyurethane foam to open flames compared to the technology currently used in the upholstered furniture industry. Additionally, Fyrol® HF-9 performs well in flexible polyurethane foam upholstered furniture applications from a cost performance and foam discoloration perspective.

·Fyrol® HF-10, which was recently developed and commercialized, represents an even greater step forward in terms of volatile organic compounds for flexible polyurethane foam for automotive applications. The product was developed specifically to support the global automotive industry’s gradual shift away from TDCP.

·SaFRon 6605 is a product containing phosphorus and bromine product particularly appropriate for flame retarding rigid polyurethane spray foam insulation systems aimed at meeting flammability standards and building codes that promote the safe use of foam in insulation systems.

Production

ICL Industrial Products’ major manufacturing facilities are located in Israel (production of bromine and bromine compounds), the Netherlands (bromine compounds), Germany (phosphorus compounds), the United States (phosphorus compounds) and China (bromine compounds).

ICL Industrial Products’ principal manufacturing plants and marketing companies are set forth in the map below:

In 2016, ICL produced 162 thousand tons of bromine, 216 thousand tons of bromine compounds, and 85 thousand tons of phosphorus compounds. The maximum annual capacity is approximately 280 thousand tons of elemental bromine, 430 thousand tons of bromine compounds and 140 thousand tons of phosphorous compounds.


Competition

ICL Industrial Products is the world's largest manufacturer of elemental bromine. Based on internal estimates, ICL and its two main competitors, Albemarle and Chemtura, accounted for approximately 75% of the worldwide consumption of bromine in 2016. Chinese production accounts for most of the remainder of the global consumption from various different sources, including, from brine produced from wells, sea water and desalinization plants. Chemtura and Albemarle produce bromine primarily from underground brine sources in the United States. Albemarle also has a joint venture with a Jordanian company for production of bromine and bromine compounds, which began its operations in November 2002 and is located on the Jordanian side of the Dead Sea with access to the same source of raw materials that we have. In the beginning of 2013, Albemarle doubled the production capacity of the bromine produced by the JV, and expanded its production capacity of the bromine compounds it produces on the Jordanian site. Chemtura purchases bromine and some other bromine compounds from ICL Industrial Products under long-term contracts.

The main barrier to entry into the bromine and bromine compound market is access to an economically viable source of bromine at a sufficiently high concentration. In addition, the bromine business requires a complex logistics system based on special containers (isotanks) for transporting the bromine. The need for the logistics system is a barrier to entry of competitors into the global trade in bromine.

The Dead Sea operations offer the world’s highest bromine concentration. As a result, ICL Industrial Products’ relatively low production cost of elemental bromine gives it a competitive advantage. An additional competitive advantage derives from ICL’s isotanks fleet, which is the largest in the world. In addition, ICL Industrial Products has a widespread worldwide marketing network and a range of high-quality products, combined with a technical support system that works closely with customers, providing a good competitive position in its target markets. In China, for example, ICL Industrial Products’ network includes three production facilities, a sales network and technical support. In the Netherlands, ICL Industrial Products has a bromine compound production facility, which gives it a competitive advantage in Europe. The phosphorous-based flame retardant and functional fluids production plants in the United States and Europe are situated in close proximity to ICL Industrial Products’ principal customers.

In the phosphorous-based flame retardants market, competition is mainly from Chinese manufacturers operating in the local market and in markets outside China, mainly Europe and the United States. The Chinese manufacturers have access to a source of high-quality, low-cost phosphorus, which improves their capacity to compete in this market.

There are many competitors in the biocides market for water treatment. The major barrier to entry into the market is related to the process of obtaining approval from the regulatory authorities to supply the biocide. During 2015, a new regulation (BPR Art. 95) entered into effect in Europe permitting only holders of the biocide approvals to sell. This acted to remove Chinese producers from supplying directly to the market. ICL is a registered and approved biocides producer.

Raw Materials and Suppliers

The principal raw ma terials used by ICL Industrial Products for manufacture of the end products are bromine, chlorine and phosphorus. The Company produces a significant portion of its raw materials through the Dead Sea minerals extraction operations. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—D. Property, Plants and Equipment—Mineral Extraction and Mining Operations” for further information on the extraction operations.


The bromine is produced from the end brines (salt solutions) that are a by-product from the process of production of potash from carnallite. The brine is pumped into ICL Industrial Products’ plant in Sodom, where bromine is produced in an oxidation process using chlorine.

Chlorine is produced by electrolysis of sodium chloride and as a by-product of metal magnesium production process of Dead Sea Magnesium Ltd. (“Dead Sea Magnesium”). The electrolysis facility and the magnesium plant are located next to the bromine facility in Sodom. The sodium chloride used in the electrolysis process is a by-product of the potash production in Sodom.

ICL Industrial Products’ uses elemental bromine to manufacture bromine compounds at its facilities in Israel, the Netherlands, and China. The rest of the bromine is sold to third parties. Most bromine compounds are manufactured by a chemical process involving bromine together with a range of other raw materials, of which the largest are Bisphenol A, which is used to manufacture the bromine-based flame retardant TBBA, and phosphorus, which is used to manufacture phosphorus-based flame retardants. Furthermore, ICL Industrial Products purchases many other raw materials that are required for production of the various products.

The following is a graphic representation of the production process.

 

Elemental phosphorus (P4) is produced in a roasting process from ores originating in Central Asia (Kazakhstan), the United States and China. ICL Industrial Products uses elemental phosphorus to produce phosphorus compounds at its factories. The basic phosphorus compound, POCl3, is manufactured in a chemical process that combines phosphorus, chlorine and oxygen. The reaction of this compound with a variety of other raw materials (such as propylene oxide) creates the commercial phosphorus compounds.


Following is a graphic representation of the production process.

 

ICL Industrial Products maintains raw-material inventories in quantities that take into account the projected level of production based on consumption, supply dates, distance from the supplier, and other operational and logistical considerations.

Sales, Marketing and Distribution

ICL Industrial Products’ principal markets are the United States, western Europe, China, Japan, and Taiwan. ICL Industrial Products sells its products primarily through a network of marketing companies, agents and distributors throughout the world. Commissions are paid to agents as is customary in the sector. Most of the sales of ICL Industrial Products are not executed under long-term contracts or orders, but rather via current orders close to the date of supply. Consequently, the concept of a backlog has no significance for ICL Industrial Products.

In addition, ICL Industrial Products has framework agreements with specific customers, under which the customer may purchase up to previously-agreed maximum quantities of a product during the term, on the basis of which the customer issues purchase orders to ICL Industrial Products from time to time. In some of the agreements, sales prices have been fixed, at times subject to an update mechanism. The price determination mechanism has no significant adverse effect on the Company’s results.

ICL Industrial Products’ policy is to maintain adequate inventory, which varies from product to product, in order to ensure orderly supply to customers in light of the customers’ distance from production centers and their demand for inventory availability, while optimizing the inventory storage costs. Therefore, portions of finished product inventories are held in storage facilities in the destination countries.


ICL Industrial Products extends credit terms to its customers according to the customary practices in their locations. ICL Industrial Products’ sales are generally covered by trade credit risk insurance or by letters of credit from banks with high credit ratings.

Seasonality

ICL Industrial Products’ operations are not characterized by regular seasonal fluctuations. However, amounts sold of some of its products fluctuate between the various seasons. Agricultural products are characterized by relatively high sales in the second and third quarters. Biocides for swimming pools are characterized by relatively lower sales in the fourth quarter. The aggregate impact of these diverse seasonal differences on ICL Industrial Products is not significant.

Natural Resources Tax

On November 30, 2015, the Knesset passed the Law for Taxation of Profits from Natural Resources, which entered into effect on January 1, 2016. For additional information, see Note 17 to our audited financial statements.

Other Activities

15% of YTH shares– Following the approval from the China Securities Regulatory Commission, On January 2016, the Company completed its investment in 15% of the issued and outstanding share capital on a fully diluted basis of YTH against payment of about US$250 million. The shares are subject to a three-year lock up period as required under the PRC law. This investment is classified as an “available for sale financial asset” in ICL’s financial statement.

IDE– ICL holds 50% of IDE Technology Ltd. IDE operates in the following fields: constructing and selling water desalination plants and treatment of industrial waste water, selling water, operating and maintaining water treatment and desalination plants and developing and producing industrial evaporators. IDE has deployed approximately 400 water desalination plants in more than 40 countries worldwide and seeks to address a wide range of the world’s water challenges. IDE’s core competencies are in membrane and thermal desalination and/or treatment of industrial waste water.

In 2016, 2015 and 2014, IDE (100%) had sales of $173 million, $173 million and $278 million, respectively, operating income of $1 million, $7 million and $39 million, respectively, and net income attributable to the Company’s shareholders of $10 million, $3 million and $31 million, respectively.

Novetide – ICL holds 50% of Novetide, which is a global leader that is engaged in research and development, production and marketing of complex generic and innovative peptides for the pharmaceutical industry. Novetide’s key competitive advantages are its 100% peptide focus, the ability to handle projects of any size and complexity, extensive IP experience and end-to-end project management capabilities.

In 2016, 2015 and 2014, Novetide (100%) had sales of $47 million, $47 million and $37 million, respectively, operating income of $27 million, $27 million and $19 million, respectively, and net income attributable to the Company’s shareholders of $23 million, $23 million and $16 million, respectively.


Clearon– In March 2016 we successfully completed the sale of Clearon (chlorine-based biocide activities in USA) in accordance with ICL strategy to focus on its core businesses.

Sustainable Development Policy and Donation

The Company applies an overall policy of sustainable developmentcorporate responsibility and sustainability that integratesseeks to integrate social, economic and environmental considerations into all of our business activities. The policy stresses social responsibility, which includes taking responsibility for the safety and well-being of our employees, reducing environmental impacts, and creating a dialogue and transparent communication channel with the authorities, community service, as well as other matters in the area of sustainability. This policy includes among other things,responsible management and continues improvement in all sustainability fields: reducing environmental impacts; health and safety; product stewardship throughout the following items:entire product life cycle; responsible use of natural and land resources; rehabilitation of streams, restorationadvanced mine reclamation; fair employment; business ethics; community contribution; transparency and preservation of miningadditional fields. For additional details on our practices and quarrying regions and return thereofperformance in all sustainability fields, see “ICL Corporate Responsibility Report 2017” in our current report on Form 6-K (File no. 001-13742) furnished to the State after completion ofSEC on December 31, 2018. In addition, the activitiesCorporate Responsibility web-report (which constitutes the land was designated foraforementioned report), is available on ICL's website. Neither this current report on Form 6-K nor our website is incorporated by the State and in accordance with the provisions of law governing the matter. Reduction at the source (in terms of the flow) of the quantity of waste produced in ICL companies and increased recycling of treatable waste. These activities are performed in ongoing cooperation with manufacturers, suppliers, research institutes, customers and other users for purposes of development and application of methods for the safe production and use of products, while reducing or eliminating injury to users and the environment; safe transport – selection and instruction of responsible transporters, use of an emergency system for handling transport problems, strict care with respect to safe and correct packaging and assurance that only proper and orderly means of shipment are used.

reference into this Annual Report.

ICL has a policy of involvement and investment in the society and the community, which was formulated and approved by its Board of Directors in 2001 and was revised in 2014. Pursuant to this policy, the Company’s annual budget for community service is approved. Each investment oractivity and donation is executed in accordance with the policy and is reviewed by the relevant authorized parties according to the type and amount of the donation, including the Environment, Safety and Public Affairs Committee and the Board of Directors.

donation.

ICL focuses its cooperation with the community and its involvement on the communities in and outside of Israel from which its employees come and within which it operates. ICL's main activities are in communities in Israel's southern region, namely: Dimona, Yerucham, Beer Sheva, and the Bedouin settlements in the South. ICL focuses its activities on life sustenance areas (e.g., the society, economy and environment), education and excellence of students in the science area (with emphasis on chemistry), strengthening of the local communities through performance of various social projects for the benefit of the local residents and support of under-privilegedunderprivileged populations and those having special needs.

ICL’s charitable contributions in 20162018 totaled approximately $5 million. This amount does not include the numerous volunteer hours of the employees, partly at the employer’s expense.


Regulatory and Environmental, Health and Safety Matters

ICL is a mining and chemical company. Some of ICL’sits products are defined as hazardous substances and are potentially harmful to the environment and to the health and safety of the public as a result of theif not managed properly. This applies also to effluents, air emissions and waste that are generated during production of some of the products. These substances can cause pollution that necessitates remediation, clean up or other responsive actions. In addition, some of ICL’s products may be hazardous to those who are exposed to them during their production, transportation, storage or use. Consequently, some of the operations and products are subject toThe Company operates in accordance with environmental, health and safety regulation. There is also a risk of claims in respect of bodily injury or property damage.

The Company routinely invests in capital projects in the areas of environmental protection, health and safety, and also bearsincurs current costs in connection with these matters. In 2016,2018, ICL spent approximately $76$121 million on environmental matters, of which approximately $12$47 million relating to investmentswere capital projects in property, plant and equipment and approximately $64$74 million as awere current expense.expenses. ICL is continuing to invest in order to reduce its impact on the environment. In order to comply with the Israeli Clean Air Law and the emission permits, over the next few years the Company will make significant capital investments in the areas of environmental protection. For more information, see "Air Monitoring and Treatment Rotem” below. The Company estimates that in 2017,2019, it will spend approximately $112$171 million on environmental protection matters, of which approximately $48$101 million on investmentswill be capital projects in property, plant and equipment while approximately $64$70 million will be aon current expense. ICL is continuing its investments in the environment while making improvements and reducing our impact on the environment.

expenses.

83

Industrial production in general, and the chemicals industry in particular, requirerequires taking special precautionary measures to maintain a safe and healthy work environment. Some of ICL’s products, raw materials and production processes represent a potentially high risk to anyone who deviates from the required professional safety standards or from the mandatory means of safety.

ICL invests considerable efforts to ensure that it complies with the requirements of the authorities and acts in accordance with their instructions.

To ensure the safety of workers and others in its plants, ICL seeks to comply with strict occupational safety and health standards prescribed by local and international laws and standards. ICL invests extensive resources in training and mentoring, as well as other safety measures, in order to continually improve occupational safety and health and prevent accidents. Since 2011, ICL has succeeded in reducing the total number of work accidents (Company employees only) by almost 50% to about 80 accidents annually. ICL is continuing to enhance its procedures and measures and aims to become a leader in an attempt to reach its goal to zero accidents.

safety and environmental performance.

Regulations addressing environmental and other issues, which may have a significantan impact on ICL’s activities:

Limits on the use of products

ICL’s product safety policy is to make an evaluation of its products and to manage the responsibility thereof over their entire lives.

The Company makes an ongoing and consistent assessment of the risks of its new chemical products prior to entering them into the commercial stage.commerce. In addition, existing products undergo an evaluation process at every stage in their production process and supply chain. ICL allocatesinvests resources to research and gathering ofdevelop sufficient information and data with respect to its products in order to create a full characterization of their safety features with reference to human health hazards and environmental threats.


Limits on Cadmium in Phosphate Fertilizers

Phosphate rock, which is mined by ICL Phosphate, contains cadmium in various concentrations. Cadmium is considered to have a harmful effect on the environment and on human beings. Most countries to which ICL Phosphate sells phosphate fertilizers do not presently restrict the quantities of cadmium in fertilizers. The European Union has been conducting a series of public hearings prior to enacting a law restricting the maximum concentration of cadmium permitted in phosphate fertilizers anywhere within the European Union. The law is expected to be published in 2018. The cadmium content in ICL’s phosphate fertilizer products does not presently exceed the permissible quantity compared with the restrictions of the first stage (60 mg for 1 kg P2O5). A number of European countries in Scandinavia (Finland, Denmark and Sweden) have already instituted local limitations with respect to the cadmium content in fertilizers; however, these restrictions are not binding on the entire European Union.

New European Fertilizers Law

Fertilizer Regulation

The new future European Fertilizers LawRegulation, which is still in progress, will require the fertilizer producers to monitor additionalnew contaminating elements in fertilizer products that were not subject to monitoring in the past, and for this purpose, an examination isadditional analytical and monitoring methods will be incorporated to be made of the existence of appropriate analytical methods and full compliance with their levels.comply. In addition, pursuant to the new Law, the fertilizer producers will have to demonstrate the ability to track their products in order to ensure the quality thereof in the production and supply chain. As
In Europe the legislative process for the New Fertilizer Regulation ("NFR") is still in progress. The negotiators of the publication date,EU Parliament, Council and EU commission have made a compromise text which was approved by the effective dateCoreper (Committee of the Permanent Representatives of the Governments of the Member States to the European Union). Further approvals are needed (e.g. from the Parliament) before it is finalized. Fertilizers Europe (the branch organization of major fertilizer manufacturers in Europe), of which ICL is a member, expects that the NFR could be implemented from September 2019.
The NFR has a broad scope from all types of fertilizers, liming materials, biostimulants, growing media, soil improvers, inhibitors and blends of these materials. The impact to ICL will be considerable. Not only the labelling of products will need to change and the way to assess conformity, but also new law hastolerances and levels of contaminants are included in the NFR. Especially the level of cadmium for phosphate containing fertilizers was a point of long discussions. The current version is requiring a maximum cadmium level of 60 mg/kg P2O5 which was the level supported by the majority of the European fertilizer industry. Also for the polymer coatings on controlled release fertilizers very challenging biodegradation requirements are included in the NFR. If the criteria are not yet determined.

met in 7 years, it will not be possible to sell controlled release fertilizers using today's coatings as EC fertilizers. In addition, proposal requested by the EU commission to ECHA will likely influence the polymer coating for controlled release fertilizers. This proposed restriction was published in January 2019 by ECHA and will be open for public consultation.

84

Limitations, regulation and registration on the use of flame retardants and other products

under the Industrial Products segment

Various countries are assessing possible limitations on the use of specific chemicals. Below are details regarding the main proceedings known to the Company as of the date of this Annual Report.

·The flame retardant HBCD is on the list of materials requiring authorization in accordance with the REACH regulation, after it was defined as a "Substance of Very High Concern" in the European Union.A decision with respect to granting authorization was made and, accordingly, the continued use of HBCD in the European Union is permissible up to August 2017. The use is limited to polystyrene insulation panels of the EPS type and to companies that filed a request for the continued use. The companies that will continue using HBCD are bound by an environmental monitoring plan with respect to HBCD and are required to file a quarterly report regarding the quantities of the polymer substitute (FR-122P) available in the market and with reference to the progress of transition to use of this alternative flame retardant. The other uses of HBCD have been prohibited in Europe since August 2015 (including XPS-type polystyrene panels).

In addition, HBCD was listed in 2013 by the United Nations Convention (UNEP Stockholm Convention) as a Persistent Organic Pollutant ("POP"). In light of the fact that there was no HBCD substitute available in commercial quantities that would fulfill the global requirements, the listing included a time limited exemption for use in polystyrene insulation panels in buildings for an additional period of up to five years from the date the request is made. This approval will apply only to countries that are members of the


Convention that requested the additional period. Implementation of the listing started in October 2014. In Japan and Norway, there has been a prohibition against the use of HBCD since November 2014. In light of the decision made in the EU regarding authorization of HBCD, the EU has requested an exemption until August 2017. Other countries that have submitted a request for a temporary exemption from the prohibition against the use of HBCD include South Korea (up to 2020), Brazil, Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Switzerland (up to March 2016), China (up to 2021), Canada (up to the end of 2016) and the Czech Republic. In the United States, which is not a party to the Convention, there is no prohibition against use. However, HBCD has been included in the first list of 10 priority chemicals to be evaluated in the next 3 years for risk assessment by the EPA under the updated Lautenberg Chemical Safety Act. During 2016, ICL stopped the production of HBCD.

·In Europe, an evaluation process is underway with respect to the Tetrabromobisophenol
Tetrabromobisphenol A (TBBPA) flame retardant, is under review as part of the Chemicals Regulation in Europe (REACH). The results of this evaluationthe review are presently being discussed andexpected in 2021. During 2018, TBBPA was nominated for review under the final decision will be published in early 2017. The industry has been requested to supply more studies, a process which will take a few more years. InEuropean directive on the United States, an evaluation process of TBBPA has been started by the authorities (EPA) but due to the updated Chemicals Law in the USA it is not clear if this process will proceed. In October 2015, it was published in the US Codeof Federal Regulations (CFR) that TBBPA is onerestriction of the possible candidates for evaluation, which examines inclusionuse of the material in the Report of Carcinogens (ROC). In February 2016, the International Agency for Research and Cancer (IARC) classified TBBPA as “probably carcinogenic to humans”. At this stage, ICL Industrial products is unable to estimate the impact of such classification.

·The bromine-based flame retardant DECA is banned for usecertain hazardous substances in electrical and electronic applications in the European Union. In addition, due to the definition of DECA as a “Substance of Very High Concern”, the ECHA is leading a restriction process to prohibit most uses of DECA in the European Union by early 2019.equipment (RoHS). The publication of the decision was made in February 2017 indicating March 2019 as the implementation date for the restriction. In 2013, DECA was proposed as a candidate for deliberations at the Stockholm Convention of the United Nations as a substance having POP characteristics. The deliberations commenced in October 2013 and the decision-making processassessment is expected to be completed in 2017. Imposition of the prohibition against use is expected to enter into effect atby the end of 2018. In North America, the three largest manufacturers of bromine-based flame retardants (Albemarle, Chemtura and ICL Industrial Products) gradually phased out their distribution of DECA as of 2013. Furthermore, in 2012, ICL Industrial products commenced selling TexFRon, a substitute for DECA in the textile industry.2019. In October 2016,2018, the authorities inCalifornia Office of Environmental Health and Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) added TBBPA to the USA (EPA) published aProposition 65 list, of five substances, including DECA and another product of ICL Industrial products (phosphorus based), which will undergo an acceleratedthis process due to their definition as PBT (Persistent, Bioaccumulative and Toxic). In 2016 ICL Industrial products discontinued the DECA production activities.

·Propyl bromide, which is produced by ICL Industrial Products, was defined as a Substance of Very High Concern in the European Union in December 2012. Nonetheless, propyl bromide’s use as an intermediate will not be affected (since it is not part of this REACH process). On July 1, 2015, the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) published a recommendation to include propyl bromide in Annex 14 (XIV) under REACH. The proposal was discussed in December 2016 and a final decision is expected to be published in 2017. If the product is included in Annex 14, an authorization process will be initiated for approval of its use in degreasing applications. The

authorization may be requested for up to 12 years and the product may be used during this time until appropriate alternatives are found. This process does not have a significant impact on ICL Industrial products. Propyl bromide will also be evaluated by the US authorities (EPA) as it is one of the first 10 substances to be evaluated under the Lautenberg Chemical Safety Act.

·TXP (Tri Xylyl Phosphate), a product used as a softening substance in the plastics industry and as a functional fluid, has also been defined as a “Substance of Very High Concern” as part of the Chemicals Regulations in the EU (REACH) – however authorization has been granted for 10 years for certain uses until a suitable alternative is found. ICL Industrial products is in the process of introducing a substitute for this product. That stated above does not have a significant impact on ICLthe Industrial products.Products segment.

·
Hypobromous Acid (HOBr): The TDCP flame retardant was prohibited forNetherlands has filed a Registry of Intent (ROI) to the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA), with a proposed classification of HOBr as a reproductive toxin category 1B under the Classification, Labelling & Packaging (CLP) EU Regulation. HOBr is the active biocide formed from a few products of the Industrial Products segment. If this proposal will be accepted and becomes officially binding, it may have significant implications on the bromine-based biocidal products in the EU.
·Ammonium Bromide: Sweden has filed a dossier supporting proposed classification as reproductive toxin category 1B under the Classification, Labelling & Packaging (CLP) EU Regulation. If this proposal will be accepted and becomes officially binding, it may have significant implications on the bromides use in furniturethe EU (biocides and children's productsas chemicals).
·Biocides: in a number of statescountries, a biocidal substance and any product containing it must be registered prior to import or sale in those countries. Sale is limited to those commercial uses for which registration has been granted in a given country. The registration is generally for a limited time and needs to be renewed in order to continue selling. In the EU, biocides are regulated by the Biocides Products Regulation (BPR) under the EU Chemicals Agency (ECHA). All of the Industrial Products segment's biocide registration submissions under the BPR are currently in the United States. In California,stage of evaluation by the substance is included inrelevant Member State performing the list of materials requiring a warning notice (Proposition 65). In 2013, the Company discontinued sale of the product for use in furniture.review.

Additional specific products of ICL Industrial products are in

On November 29, 2017, the process of evaluationEuropean Commission published its delegated regulation, setting out the criteria for identifying endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) under the ChemicalEU Biocides Products Regulation (BPR) in the EU (REACH),Official Journal, and it entered in to force on June 7, 2018. BPR is the first regime to apply the ED criteria, however, it will become applicable across sectors of EU law, such as REACH, cosmetics, and food contact materials. It is to be expected that some of ICL's biocides and other chemicals might be identified as ED, and as a result might be affected by various regulatory restrictions.
Biocides have also specific regulatory requirements, depending on the specific use, in many other countries. ICL has registered all its biocides under the USA FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act) and in all relevant states in the USAUS and maintains full compliance under this law. ICL also registers its biocides as needed in Canada. As ofall target markets as required by the date of this report, there are requests to perform more studies with some products, a process that will take a few years until the evaluation is completed. Also, in some countries a process of re-registration of existing chemicals has been initiated (e.g. South Korea, Taiwan, Philippines and Turkey) but as at the date of the report, there was no request for specific products other than from South Korea. ICL Industrial products is registering in these countries all the products that are relevant for its business.

Productlocal regulations.

·
Additional specific products of the Industrial Products segment are in the process of evaluation under the Chemical Regulation in the EU (REACH), For some products, there are draft or final decisions by ECHA to perform more studies, a process that will take a few years until the evaluation is completed.
85

Chemicals Regulation and Registration

Water Treatment (Biocides)

In a number of countries, a biocidal substance and any product containing it must be registered prior to import or sale in those countries. Sale is limited to those commercial uses for which registration has been granted in a given country. The registration is generally for a limited time and needs to be renewed in order to continue selling. As of 2013, the Biocides Products Regulation (BPR in the European Union) came into effect, gradually replacing the Biocides Products Directive (PBD). The Biocides Directive implemented a process of re-registration of all existing biocides in the EU market. ICL Industrial Products submitted requests to renew registrations for existing biocides for various uses, according to the timetable set in the Regulation. Under the Directive, during the course of the registration process, it is permitted to continue selling the products for the uses sold to date, on the condition that a registration request has been submitted for that use and for the active substance in the product. The new Biocides Regulation continues the Biocides Directive with respect to completion of the registration process of the substances, however, responsibility was transferred to the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA). In addition, the Biocide Regulation introduced changes regarding the continued authorization of products containing approved active biocides in the various countries, along with additional other changes. Enforcement of the Regulation is being executed gradually, and during 2015 a new regulation entered into effect in the EU allowing sales only to registration holders. All of ICL Industrial Products’ biocide registration requests are currently in the stage of evaluation by the relevant Member State performing the review.


Chemicals

In certain countries or regions (such as, the European Union, the United States, Canada, Japan, South Korea and China), chemicals may be sold only after registration and approval by the authorities. Trade restrictions also apply to some of the products of ICL, depending on their uses, stemming from the requirements of international treaties or conventions. ICL Industrial Products registers its newly developed or currently sold products as required under local laws. ICL Industrial Products also monitors any changes made in the current regulations and/or new regulations and acts accordingly.

Registration of chemicals in

Europe (REACH)

REACH
A regulation setting up a framework for registration, evaluation, authorization and restriction (REACH) of chemicals in the European Union became effective as of June 1, 2007. The regulation applies to both chemicals already on the market, as well as to new chemicals. The regulation is being implemented gradually, between 2008 and 2018, under the authority of the ECHA (European Chemicals Agency).

The regulation covers chemicals not regulated under other specific regulations in the EU (e.g. pesticides, biocides, food, pharma, etc.).

Pursuant to this legislation, manufacturers and importers of chemicals in the European Union are required to register each chemical above one ton per year. For each chemical a Lead Registrant is assigned, who produces a joint dossier with data on the chemical. All otherOther registrants are co-registrants, who are required to produce a short dossier with company-specificcompany‑specific information and share the cost of the joint dossier. The amount and content of the information submitted in the dossier depends on the volume of production and/or sales in the EU, and the nature of the product in terms of its effect on health and the environment. Some of the products will undergo a thorough chemical evaluation by the ECHA and by a Member State based on the information that has been submitted. As part of the process, of the law, ECHA regularly publishes and updates a list of substances defined as “Substances of Very High Concern” (SVHC). The process defines, later on, substances which are candidates for authorization. Such authorization will only be granted on the basis of quantified evidence relating to management of the product with regard to health and environmental aspects, a lack of appropriate alternatives, and a socio-economicsocio‑economic evaluation. An authorization will be granted to a substance defined as SVHC for a specific use(s) and for a limited period of time. It is expected that for such substances, alternatives will be developed and introduced to the EU market.

Apart from higher production and raw material costs following implementation of REACH, under the law our subsidiaries incur costs in the field of registration, control and implementation of product stewardship programs with customers. Another possible risk caused by the REACH legislation is removal of certain substances from the European Union markets or prohibition of certain uses of a substance in the EU. However, there will be opportunities to introduce newly developed substances as alternatives to substances in products that will be restricted or removed from use in the European Union markets.

All of ICL business linessegments are implementing REACH and are registering their chemicals as required by law. All of ICL business lines havehas submitted applications for registrations for all the chemicals relevant for theirits businesses in EU (production and sale) within the timetables set in the law (2010 and 2013).law. ICL has also volunteered to lead and prepare a large number of joint dossiers for the entire industry (as a Lead Registrant). All of ICL’s business lines are now preparing and have initiated the registrations of substances towards the final deadline under the regulation in 2018. 


86

As at the date of this Annual Report, there are several substances which are under evaluation by the Authorities, some of which arehave been listed as SVHCs.Substances of Very High Concern (SVHCs). For more details, please refer to our Industrial Products business line includedsee “Item 4 - Information on the Company— B. Business Overview—Regulatory and Environmental, Health and Safety Matters — Limitations on the Use of Flame Retardants and Other Products”.
CLP Regulation
Another important regulation in this report.

All the chemicals have been classified in line withEU is the CLP regulation (classification, labeling(Classification, Labeling and packagingPackaging of substances and mixtures), that entered into effect in the European Union in December 2010.

Food ingredients Under this regulation the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) is reviewing classifications of substances and pharmaceuticalmixtures. An outcome of a severe classification may have an impact on a specific product's market in the EU and even lead to additional implications outside of Europe.

USA
The Toxic Substances Control Act of 1976 (TSCA), addresses the production, importation, use, and disposal of specific chemicals in the USA. The TSCA is administered by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) that regulates the introduction of new and existing chemicals.
During 2016, the TSCA was reformed and some new requirements were implemented. One of the significant changes is the inventory reset rule, which required all manufacturers and importers to the USA to submit a report of all non-exempt substances imported or manufactured for commercial use during the years 2006-2016. This report is in order to ascertain the substances which will be classified as "Active" or "Inactive" in the TSCA inventory. ICL completed the submission prior to the deadline of February 2018.
Asia
K-REACH
On March 20, 2018, Korea’s Ministry of Environment (MoE) announced amendments to Act on Registration and Evaluation etc. of Chemicals (known as K-REACH), which has entered into force on January 1, 2019 and is similar to the EU REACH.
K-REACH includes registration requirements for all substances manufactured or imported into Korea above defined thresholds, at defined timelines, similarly to EU REACH. Basically, registration timelines for K-REACH are volume based, starting December 31, 2021, and ending December 31, 2030 (registration grace period for existing substances above 1 ton).  Some substances or uses (e.g. R&D substances, export only, polymer of low concern) are exempt from registration. However, a confirmation on exemption must be applied for.
Strict penalties are to be imposed on the manufacture, import, or sale of hazardous chemicals without registration.
ICL is getting prepared by collecting information towards the incoming pre-registration step, which is the first stage of K-REACH regulation, that starts on January 2019 and ends on June 2019. Completion of this step will allow continuation of ICL sales to Korea, to be subsequently followed by full registration processes.

87

Air Quality
Climate Change and Greenhouse Gas Issues
Climate change is of increasing concern to governments, non‑governmental organizations, and the general public. Increasing regulation of greenhouse gases (“GHGs”) could impact ICL’s operations by requiring changes to its production processes or increasing raw‑material, energy, production and transportation costs. ICL is striving to become a leader in reduction of emissions, in general, and GHG emissions, in particular. The Company has therefore set a target of reducing 30% of the base year 2008 emissions, by 2020.
ICL’s reduction efforts include a strategic conversion of its main plants to the use of natural gas, utilization of new technologies to reduce production emissions, and comprehensive energy efficiency initiatives. The combined result of these efforts has resulted in a 23% reduction in the GHG emissions of ICL between 2008 and 2017. This reduction constitutes 77% of our planned reduction target by 2020. It should be noted that excluding ICL’s acquisition of YPH JV, the Company has already surpassed it’s 30% reduction target.
The total ICL global GHG emissions for 2017 are 3,225,551 tonnes CO2e (Scope 1‑ 1,908,948 tonnes CO2e, Scope 2- 1,138,502 tonnes CO2e, Scope 3- 178,101 tonnes CO2e). The 2018 emissions will be finalized after the publication of this annual report. The Company currently expects a decrease in total emissions in 2018, with the full operation of the new Sodom power plant, supplying less-carbon intense electricity to ICL's sites in Israel.
In addition, ICL promotes the development of new products do not fall under REACHthat contribute to reduction of GHG emissions and are registered underup to now has analyzed the foodcarbon footprint of over 60 of its products.
ICL annually reports its emissions data and pharma regulations.

Air Quality

its efforts in the climate change field to the CDP (Carbon Disclosure Project), a non-profit leading organization in the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions reporting field. For its 2018 report, ICL has received a general CDP ranking of "B", which is tied for second place among global fertilizer companies. Also in 2018, for the CDP's new second sub-score, the Supplier Engagement Rating (SER), ICL has received the maximum score of "A". Only 120 of 5000  (2.5%) reporting companies achieved this score. ICL is the only fertilizer company and the only Israeli company, to make this "A" list.

This achievement reflects the enhancement of ICL's sustainable procurement practices in recent years. In October 2018, ICL has also joined the TFS (Together For Sustainability) initiative, a global supplier sustainability initiative which will enable our global procurement organization to enhance its engagement with the supply chain and increase ICL's confidence in the good practices of its suppliers.
88

Israel

The Israeli Clean Air Law – Air Emission Permit

On July 31, 2008, the Clean Air Law was enacted to regulate the treatment and control of air pollution in Israel. The law is effective as of 2011.

The Clean Air Law addresses, inter alia, fixed sources (including the Company’s plants) and is intended to serve as a platform for implementing the IPPC directive that was adopted by the European Union in 1996.

As of the date of this Annual Report, all ICL’s plants in Israel have received air emission permits. The air emission permits include provisions regarding the application of the BAT,Best Available Technologies (BAT), as well as provisions with respect to monitoring, control and reporting to the Ministry of Environmental Protection. The Company is taking steps to implement a plan to address the requirements of the air emission permits in coordination with the Ministry of Environmental Protection.

Examinations made by the Ministry of the EnvironmentEnvironmental Protection in ICL Magnesium’s factoriesplant indicated that there are alleged discrepancies between the values measured in a number of stacks compared with the requirements provided in the emission permit. The factoryplant was summoned to a hearing in order to clarifyand clarification of the matter. As at the date of the report, it is not clear whether the findings relating to the factoryplant are reliable and the matter is to bewas addressed with the Ministry’s personnel during the clarification. In addition,hearing. Notwithstanding the said uncertainty, in order to ensure compliance with the required values, the plant has initiated three projects for dealing with emissions. All were completed by December 31, 2018. Furthermore, ICL Magnesium initiated the installation of certain devices,additional system to reduce the level of emissions in the plant's main stack, the completion of which underis expected in the termscoming years.
In 2016, ICL Rotem received a new emission permit, as part of the emissionsClean Air Law, requiring compliance with more strict conditions than the ones in the previous permit. In order to meet the requirements set in the new emission permit, ICL Rotem began implementing a multi-year plan for several projects. During 2017 and 2018, ICL Rotem was supposedsummoned to have been completed prior toan administrative hearings in the Ministry of Environmental Protection, in connection with alleged violations of its emission permit. At the publication date of this report, has not yetno additional enforcement steps had been completed.

taken by the Ministry. Nevertheless, ICL Rotem is taking action to address the above mentioned deviations as part of the multi-year plan, including the implementation of the provisions of the Clean Air Law, in accordance with disscussions with the Ministry of Environmental Protection regarding the implementation of the law.

Over the next few years, the Company will make significant capital investments in order to comply with the emission permits received.

Air Quality – Monitoring and Treatment

During the Company’s production processes, pollutants are emitted, which could be harmful to people or to the environment if they were to be emitted into the environment in concentrations or amounts exceeding the permitted levels. The materials emitted are mainly inorganic compounds and particles and a minority of volatile organic compounds. The Company regularly and continuously measures the emission of these pollutants in order to monitor and locate uncontrolled emissions, in accordance with the provisions of the law and the conditions set forth in the business licenses and Emissions Permitemission permits.


After a project was completed for installation The Company is advancing execution of two large extraction and filtering systemsprojects to reduce emissions into the atmosphere in accordance with the terms of the emission of particle materials in Zin’s factories, the Company moved into the second stage, for treatment of two additional sites, by means of installing an additional pumping and filtering system and through connection to the existing pumping and filtering system.permits.

89

Rotem - In addition, there is a new absorption system in the fertilizers’ factorySeptember 2016, plants at Mishor Rotem in placereceived an emission permit pursuant to the Israeli Clean Air Law. The Company is striving to implement the requirements of the systempermit. During 2017, the Company filed an appeal for changing 46 permit tasks. The Ministry of Environmental Protection (MOE) agreed to change 43 of them and a final permit was received in July 2018.
Until December 2018, the Company has completed 50 of the 180 specific tasks required by the Clean Air permit. In the second half of 2018 the Company conducted two risk assessments by external experts regarding the ability to execute all of the Clean Air tasks on time. The risk assessments focused on the safety and technical issues of implementing the large number of tasks according to the timetable. The risk assessments show that was damagedRotem cannot implement the Clean Air requirements safely and with reasonable quality in the firepermit defined time line. After the risk assessments were completed the Company started a new negotiation, now ongoing, with the MOE in order to reschedule the implementation period.
During 2018, the sulphuric acid plant replaced and upgraded a catalyst system in order to reduce specific emissions by more than 30%.
In Rotem, there are on-fence monitoring systems that occurred in June 2015.report on-line parameters to the environmental authorities. The system’s operation began on March 2017.

In 2015, a project was successfully completed at the Fertilizers and Chemicals Ltd. (ICL Haifa) facility for reduction of ammonia emissions through installation of a demistermonitoring systems are in the stackfinal stage of the nitrate ammonia manufacturing facility.

Furthermore,receiving ISO 17025 permit.

Fertilizers & Chemicals (F&C) - ICL’s Haifa factory in the northern Israel is presently undergoing conversion and connectionwas converted to the natural gas distribution network in the North.during 2018. This connection is contingent on, among other things, receiptconducted as part of a building permit from the City of Kiryat Atta and compliance by the distribution contractor with the timetables.

ICL’s shift to environmentally-friendly energy sources throughout its facilities.

DSW - In the area of the Sodom Industrial Zone, ICL Dead Sea Works operates three stations for emissionair quality monitoring into the atmosphere,stations, pursuant to the Clean Air Law. The data, which is measured on a continuous basis, is automatically sent to the Internet site of the National Monitoring Center of the Ministry of Environmental Protection, which is accessible to the general public.

The production facilities of the Dead Sea Magnesium factory produce mainly inorganic emissions. The exhaust stacks are monitored in accordance with the directives in the emissions permits issued to the company.

The main production facilities of ICL Potash and MagnesiumDead Sea Works in Sodom have been fully converted to natural gas and are connected to the gas transport network.

ICL

During the third quarter of 2018, the new power plant in Sodom became operational. The power plant is expected to reduce energy costs and is more environmental friendly.
DSM - The production facilities of the Dead Sea Magnesium plant produce mainly inorganic emissions. Some of the exhaust stacks are monitored in accordance with the directives in the emission permits issued to the Company. In the Dead Sea Magnesium plant, detectors were installed that send on‑line computerized warnings to the environmental authorities.
Neot Hovav - the Industrial Products segment operates advanced monitoring and detection methods to identify malfunctions in its plants’ operation and emissions treatment systems,, such that before a malfunction occurs the facility's manufacturing activities are halted, and thus steps are taken to minimize uncontrolled emissions according to the laws and the conditions set out in its business license, its poisons permit, and its emissions permit. In addition, integrated pollution prevention and control (IPPC) methodologies are also applied, which provide guidance forregarding all of the techniques for preventing and monitoring emissions into the environment.

Set forth below is a list of the The main actions taken by ICLthe Industrial Products segment in the area of air quality:

·Investments were made in the production facilities in order to improve recycling and recovery of solvents and other organic materials emitted into the air via activated charcoal systems, in order to achieve reduction of the amount of these materials emitted into the air.

·In addition,quality are: investments were made in catalytic oxidizing technologies that reduce volatile organic compound emissions and compliance with advanced values in accordance with the BAT.

·Investments were made in the installation and upgrading of absorption systems in the inorganic systems.

·Investments were made in the installation and upgrading of filters to prevent emissions of particles emissions from the solids handling systems.

·Sealing of diffused emissions in the loading and unloading areas was made.

·Ongoing work is executed for the LDAR program – control and treatment of fugitives emissions with the assistance of a European company.

·Mishor Rotem factories, including ICL Rotem and Periclase, along with other factories, in accordance with the requirement of the Ministry of Environmental Protection and the Environmental Unit, are in the advanced stage of establishment of a regional air monitoring system.

Greenhouse Gas Issues

Climate change is of increasing concern to governments, non-governmental organizations, and the general public. Increasing regulation of greenhouse gases (“GHGs”) could impact ICL’s operations by requiring changes to its production processes or increasing raw-material, energy, production and transportation costs. ICL is striving to become a leader in reduction of emissions, in general, and GHG emissions, in particular. ICL’s efforts include the strategic conversion of its main plants to natural gas combustion, the utilization of new technologies to reduce process emissions at ICL Magnesium and ICL Haifa, and comprehensive energy efficiency initiatives. The combined result of these efforts has resulted in a 40% reduction in the global GHG emissions between 2008 and 2015. In addition, ICL promotes the development of new products that contribute to reduction of GHG emissions reductions. ICL measures annually the GHG inventory of all the production facilities in operation,order to improve recycling and uprecovery of solvents and other organic materials emitted into the air via activated charcoal systems, in order to now has analyzedachieve reduction of the carbon footprintamount of over 60 of its products.

ICL reports itsthese materials emitted into the air; investments were made in catalytic oxidizing technologies that reduce volatile organic compound emissions data annually and its effortscomply with advanced values in accordance with the BAT (Best Available Technique); investments were made in the climate change field to the CDP (Carbon Disclosure Project), a non-profit organization working to reduce the reductioninstallation and upgrading of greenhouse gas emissions. As a result of ICL’s comprehensive transparency efforts and the significant reduction in its emissions, the CDP awarded ICL the second best possible score, A–, in connection with its 2016 report. The 2016 score is the highest score achieved by any Israeli-based company, is among the top 25% scores of all the 2,400 global reporting companies, and is the second-best among all global fertilizer-producing companies.  In 2014, ICL was also includedabsorption systems in the CDP CPLI (Carbon Performance Leadership Index) – an exclusive list of global companies that have excelled in emission reduction and climate change mitigation. So far, ICL is the only Israeli-based company that has been includedinorganic systems; investments were made in the exclusive CPLI list.  In addition, ICLinstallation and upgrading of filters to prevent emissions of particles from the solids’ handling systems; sealing of diffused emissions in the loading and unloading areas was made; ongoing work is onebeing executed for the LDAR (Leak Detection and Repair) program – control and treatment of the first Israeli companies to report itsfugitive emissions to the voluntary GHG registry established by Israel’s Ministry of Environmental Protection, and is contributing from its experience to the development of the registry through constant dialogue with the Ministry's representatives.

assistance of a European company.

During 2018, Periclase installed an air emissions treatment facility for the Magnesia manufacturing process.
90

Europe

AirEmission

In Europe, emissions are regulated under the EU IED – Industrial Emission Directive. IED is executed through state or federal regulations and laws. Preventive measures and best available techniquesBest Available Technologies (BAT) are applied. Emission limit values for relevant substances are included as


part of our authority approvals. There are rules guaranteeing protection of air, soil and water. In Europe, relevant emissions control is conducted by authority inspection, through independent technical supervisory associations and by self-inspection. ICL plants falling under the European SEVESO directive conduct regular safety inspections and prepare reports.

Relevant potential sources for emissions are registered and controlled also by the authorities on a regular basis. If required, on-line-monitoring systems are installed. In addition, investments were made in the installation and upgrading of filter, separation and absorption systems in order to keep the air emission limits.
ICL internal responsible personsBoulby’s air emissions are appointedpermitted under the Environmental Permitting Regulations (England and Wales) 2010 (as amended), and regulated by the Local Authority and the Environment Agency. As required within these permits, the emission sources are monitored both periodically and continuously, and results are reported as environmental protection officers.

required by the regulators.

European Plan for Trade in GHG Emissions

The European Union, as a party that signed the Kyoto Protocol the(the framework treaty of the United Nations for dealing with climate changes,changes), has agreed on a mandatory target for reducing the emissionemissions of greenhouse gases. The main tool for achieving the reduction targets is the EU Emissions Trading Scheme (“ETS”), which was launched on January 1, 2005. In the first and second phases of the ETS, the European countries agreed that every industrial company that emits GHGs above the agreed minimum threshold is required to report its emissions and to limit the emissionsthem to the gradually decreasing periodic quota. In addition, companies were allowed to realize a monetary gain or benefit by trading and selling unused emission permits (or ‘carbon allowances’). The third phase of the ETS commenced on January 1, 2013 and will run up to December 31, 2020. This phase includes a further decrease in the free allocation of carbon allowances to all industrial companies. Some of ICL's largest sites in Europe are participants in the ETS, and therefore receive annual carbon allowances ("EUA's") and are then obligated to participate inemit up to the EU–ETS, and are therefore obligated to reduce their emissionsannual allowances and/or purchase carbon allowances.extra EUA's. Unused allocated EUA's can be sold. In 2018, ICL sold some surplus EUA's from its UK Boulby site. ICL is closely monitoring the developments and emission allocation policies of the EU–ETS and is taking them into account when establishing/purchasing new sites in Europe and when considering potential significant expansions of existing sites.

91

Americas

Air emissions in the Americas are managed through operating permits issued by the relevant agency responsible for each individual site. In the United States, air permits are issued under the authority of the US EPA’s Clean Air Act. In Mexico, air emissions are managed through the site’s single environmental license or the LAU issued by SEMARNAT. In Brazil, air emissions are managed under the site’s operatingoperation license issued by the Sao Paulo State environmental agency – CETESB.

Air pollution control equipment is employed throughout the region to ensure that ICL’s facilities comply with the emission parameters established by the regulators. Continued maintenance of pollution control equipment and improvement of control efficiencies is the focus.
China

The Company’sphosphate plant in China is tested once every six months by the Center for Environmental Protection regarding gas emissions. In the phosphate plant, the Company has adapted its facilities in by means of installation of systems monitoring gas emissions in order to comply with local regulations and regulatory schemes. The plant is in compliance with all the laws and regulations.

In 2017, the ammonia complex, which was located near the residential area proximate to the plant, was moved to the plant’s premises.

Energy

The European Energy Efficiency Directive (EED)

The newlatest Energy Efficiency Directive of the European Union enteredcame into effect on December 4, 2012. Most of theThe requirements in the Energy Efficiency Directive must be implemented by companies operating in the European Union in the future.Union. The Energy Efficiency


Directive provides a joint framework to advance energy efficiency in the European Union in order to achieve the European Union’s energy goals by 2020. These goals include the reduction of GHG emissions by 20% compared with the levels in 1990, an increase in the rate of consumption of renewable energy sources to 20% of the total energy consumption and an improvement in energy efficiency by 20%. Accordingly, all countries that are members of the European Union are required to increase the efficiency of their energy consumption in all stages of the energy chain — conversion, transportation and final use. ICL is developing and adopting strategies and procedures at all of its European plants designed to comply with the local interpretations of the Directive.

Natural Gas

In 2012 the Company signed agreements for supply of natural gas to the Group’s manufacturing facilities in Israel with the “Tamar” reservoir. On April 1, 2013,December 5, 2017, ICL signed an agreement with Energean Israel Ltd. for the supply of up to 13 BCM of natural gas fromover a period of 15 years, amounting to approximately $1.9 billion. On November 2018, all conditions precedent to the Tamar Field commenced asagreement with Energean have been met. The signing of this agreement marked an important milestone for securing a substitute forconsistent supply of gas to the quantity previously supplied byCompany’s facilities in Israel at a competitive price in relation to current gas supply agreements. 
92

In February 2018, the Yam Tethys partnership. SupplyCompany entered into two supply agreements with the “Tamar" and “Leviathan” reservoirs to secure the gas supply needs of the gas fromCompany until the Tamar Field fulfills allend of ICL’s gas needs for2025 or until the facilities for which it has completed the conversions. Under the Gas Sale and Purchase Agreement between the Company and the "Tamar" Group, the Company is classified as a "Tier C" customer and accordingly under the termsentry of the agreement, until the delivery capacity of the Tamar pipeline connecting the Tamar reservoir to the shore is“Karish” and “Tanin” reservoirs into service (Energean) ‑ whichever occurs first.
The increased to 64,000 mBtu/H (if at all), if the daily nomination of Tamar's "Tier A" and "Tier "B" customers exceed 40,000 mBtu/H, Tamar is not obligated to supply the Company's daily nomination. Conversely, during this period the Company is not subject to any take or pay obligation. In 2012, the Council for Natural Gas Matters published a decision regarding arrangement of use of the natural gas pipeline capacity. The Council for Natural Gas Matters decision stipulates that the gas pipeline capacity is limited and it is not able to supply the entire amount of the anticipated demand in the upcoming years. Therefore, the Council for Gas Matters has provided a pro rata mechanism that may, to the best of the Company's knowledge, minimize the curtailment of the quantity of gas supplied to the Company at a time when there is a shortage in capacity of the pipeline. Increased use of natural gas in ICL’s facilities is expected tohas significantly reducereduced emissions of air pollutants in the area surrounding our facilities, improveimproved the quality of the output, reducereduced maintenance expenses and leadhas led to a significant monetary savings due to the transition from the use of more expensive fuels.

Prevention

For more information, see “Item 5 - Operating and Financial Review and Prospects— A. Operating Results— Principal Factors Affecting our Results of Operations and Financial Condition”.
Liquid, Solid Waste and Land Contamination and Restoration of Contaminated Lands

Israeli Bill for Prevention of Land Contamination and Restoration of Contaminated Lands

In April 2014, the Ministry of Environmental Protection published for the public’s comments a draft of policy principles regarding land contamination, which reflects the policy practiced by the Ministry, as expressed both in the business licenses and in the toxic permits issued by the Ministry. In this context, the policy will make no material change in the current legal situation. The pertinent change to the Company resulting from the proposed policy is that all major industrial facilities (including all of ICL’s manufacturing sites) will be required by their business licenses to conduct historical surveys.

All of the Company's plants in Israel have conducted historical land surveys, based on a demand received as part of the conditions for receipt of a business license regarding an integrated arrangement, submitted them to the Ministry of Environmental Protection and are awaiting the Ministry's instructions.

At the Sodom site, historical crude oil contamination has been found near the operational salt reservoir. The ICL Dead Sea subsidiary submitted a plan to the Ministry of Environmental Protection for treatment at the site and is awaiting the Ministry's


instructions. The Bill for Prevention of Land Contamination and Restoration of Contaminated Lands, which is in the legislative process, as mentioned above may affect the treatment and the solution that is selected.

In addition, a groundwater study in ICL Dead Sea’s power stations’ contaminated oil tank farm showed no groundwater contamination; however, soil rehabilitation is expected in the future. At the old gas station, boreholes were drilled and oil is being pumped from the contaminated soil and groundwater.

Furthermore, there is an ongoing implementation of a multi-year master plan to prevent ground pollution by fuels or oils at our Rotem sites.

Liquid and Solid Waste

During the production processes at ICL’s facilities, industrial solid waste and wastewater are produced. According to the discharge permit, wastewater is channeled into water sources or evaporation ponds.

The various production sites have adapted their treatment systems to the standards applicable to them.

Israel
IsraelRotem

At the ICL Rotem site, a master plan for treating waste is being implemented with the principal aims of reducinggoal to reduce the effluent quantities, turning part of the effluents into products, recycling the wastewater, reducing the water consumption, treatment of wastewater and neutralization and restoration of the wastewater reservoirs.

ponds, including the wastewater caused by the air emmision purificatio process required by the Israeli Clean Air Law.

At ICL Dead Sea's, a project was completed for restoring 100%

As part of the runoffliquid and solid waste treatment, Rotem site is treating the gypsum waste by ponds and storage. In June 2018, the new Pond 5 started to operate. The Company started reclamation planning for gypsum ponds 1 through 4 that were used by Rotem in the past. In October 2018, the Court approved a settlement agreement between ATD (Adam Teva V’Din - Israeli Association for Environmental Protection) and the Company. Based on the agreement, Rotem will submit a plan for building a future gypsum pond on the west side of road 258. In addition, to the facilityauthorities' request, Rotem will submit an alternative location. The final location will be determined based on a full environmental survey, that will be held in the first half of 2019. For additional information, see Note 20 to our Audited Financial Statements.
The Company has conducted several pilots for wastewater recovery for the treatmentplants of sanitary waste forWPA, MGA and fertilizers.
In 2017, as a result of a partial collapse of a dyke in Pond 3 in the production facility.

Atplants of Rotem Amfert Israel, a leak occurred into Ashalim stream. Rotem Amfert Israel takes intensive action to restore the stream, in full cooperation with the relevant authorities. For additional information, see Note 20 to our Audited Financial Statements.

Fertilizers & Chemicals (F&C) – In ICL Haifa facility, a number ofseveral biological pilots and other pilots were conducted to find possible solutions for compliance by the facility with the standards covering treatment of the facility’s wastewater flowing into the Kishon River, as directed by the Inbar Committee. The possible solutions were presented toAfter careful considerations, the solution that was chosen and discussed with the Ministry of Environmental Protection. During the discussions with the Ministry of Environmental Protection, it was agreed that ICL Haifa will not make an investment in construction of a biological facility but, rather, will take other steps to improve the quality of the wastewater and the matter will be re-examinedapproved by the parties later on.

ICL Industrial Products operates a special authorized laboratory for monitoring and analyzingauthorities is to drill to the underground water zone in order to channel the treated wastewater quality.

into the underground water. The investment expected to be carried out during 2019.


93

Neot HovavAt the Bromine Compounds plant a sanitary facility for independent treatment of the sanitary effluents is operated. The treated wastewater is flowedsent as an input fluidfeed into the cooling towers. In addition, in the Bromine Compounds plant, a facility was constructed for treating industrial waste water,wastewater, which includes a transmission system, physicochemical unit, MBR (Membrane Bio Reactor) unit and evaporation ponds. The system was built according to a U.SUS standard, which includes leakage monitoring and air monitoring. In 2013, construction of the evaporation ponds was completed, and beginning in late 2013, all the plant’s wastewater is presently being pumped into the newthese evaporation ponds.

At ICL’s manufacturing facility at Neot Hovav, Israel, there is hazardous waste.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Ministry of Environmental Protection, in the coming years ICL is required to treat the existing hazardous waste (historical), which is stored on a special site on the facility's premises (Area 14) in coordination with the Ministry of Environmental Protection, as well as the ongoing waste that is produced in the facility's present manufacturing processes. The treatment will beis partly through a combustion facility, which recovers hydro-bromine acid, operated by the subsidiary, while part of the waste will be sent to an outside source for treatment. The total provision for waste treatment amounts to about $62$56 million. The Company estimates, based on the information available as at the approval date of the annual financial statements, that the said provision covers the estimated cost of treating the historical waste.

Industrial Products operates a special authorized laboratory for monitoring and analyzing wastewater quality.
ICL established a thickening and filtration facility to treat solid waste at the Periclase plant.

plant in Mishor Rotem. 

Europe

Liquid and solid waste and emissions are regulated under the European IED – Industrial Emission Directive. WasteThe Company implements waste monitoring and management measures, are in place with an obligationand is obligated to inform the authorities onof the results. Wastewater regulations, including effluent limits, are regulated by states and partly by communities. ICL has provisions regarding the avoidance of pollution and conditions for assessing compliance with the emission limit values.

Wastewater is partly pretreated and sent to municipalities and third parties for final treatment before discharging. The production processes, in general, are not generating significant volumes of direct solid waste. In case solid waste needs to be disposed of, the required documentation and approvals under the European regulations are fulfilled.
Due to phosphate pollution in the subsoil of the Ladenburg site, the phosphate concentration is monitored at several wells and reported regularly to the authorities.

In Spain, a multi-yearmulti‑year program is underway to restore salt piles while paying close attention to the issue of wastewater drainage and sludge treatment. In 2015, in accordance with the provisions of the Spanish Environmental Protection Law,Waste Management regulation, ICL Iberia submitted to the Government of CatalonaCatalonia a mining site restoration plan for the two production sites Suria


and Sallent, which includes among other things, a plan for handling the salt piles and dismantling of facilities. The restoration plan for the Suria site is scheduled to run up to 2094, whereas the restoration plan for the Sallent site is scheduled to run up to 2070. During 2016, in light of talks held withIn June 2018, the authorities in connection with thenew restoration plan for treating the salt pile on the Sallent site, it was found that a number of changes in the plan are required with respect the water pumping process, which constitutes part of the removal plan.approved. For moreadditional information, see “Item 8.Note 20 to our Audited Financial Information—A. Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information—Legal Proceedings.”

Statements. 

China94

The phosphate plant in China is located in a rural area. The Company’s facilities in China are tested once every six months by the Center for Environmental Protection regarding gathering of solid waste and hazardous waste. The Company has adapted its plant by means of installation of systems for removal of wastewater and diversion thereof from clean water sources, in order to comply with the local regulations. The plant has received a license for unloading contaminating materials and strict environmental licenses and it is in compliance with all the laws and regulations.

Furthermore, annual land examinations are conducted in accordance with the regulatory requirements.


Americas

The liquid and solid wastes in the Americas sites are managed under country and state specific regulatory requirements. In the USA, solid and hazardous wastes are regulated under the US EPA’s Resource Conservation and Recovery Act. In Mexico, waste is managed through the site’s single environmental license or the LAU issued by SEMARNAT. In Brazil, waste is managed under the site’s operation license issued by statethe Sao Paulo State environmental agency – CETESB.

ICL follows a qualification process for waste vendors, which assists in ensuring that waste is properly profiled, treatment standards are followed and disposal processes meet regulatory requirements. Wastewater is managed through site industrial discharge permits that are managed through federal, state or local agencies. Waste water treatment is mainly focused on chemical treatment. The wastewater treatment systems are maintained on a regular basis.
China
The phosphate plant in China is located in a rural area. The Company’s facilities in China are tested once every six months by the Center for Environmental Protection regarding gathering of solid waste and hazardous waste. In order to comply with the local regulations, the Company has adapted its plant by means of installation of systems for removal of wastewater and diversion thereof from clean water sources, including transferring phosphogypsum water (which is created as a by-product of the production processes) into designated ponds for further treatment. The plant has received a license for unloading contaminating materials and strict environmental licenses and it is in compliance with all the laws and regulations. Furthermore, annual land examinations are conducted in accordance with the regulatory requirements.
Land contamination
All of the Company's plants in Israel have conducted historical land surveys, based on a demand received as part of the conditions for receipt of a business license regarding an integrated arrangement, submitted them to the Ministry of Environmental Protection and are awaiting the Ministry's instructions.
At the Sodom site, historical crude oil contamination has been found near the operational salt reservoir. ICL Dead Sea submitted a plan to the Ministry of Environmental Protection for treatment at the site and is awaiting the Ministry's instructions.
In addition, a groundwater study in ICL Dead Sea’s old power stations’ contaminated fuel tank farm showed no groundwater contamination; however, soil rehabilitation is expected in the future. At the old gas station, boreholes were drilled and diesel fuel is being pumped from the contaminated groundwater.
Furthermore, the implementation of a multi‑year master plan to prevent ground pollution by fuels or oils at our Rotem sites was completed.
95


Hazardous Substances

Israel
As part of ICL’s operations, it produces, stores, transports, and uses materials that are defined as hazardous materials according to the Israeli Hazardous Substances Law, 1993. Handling such substances requires a special permit ("poisons permit") that is renewed annually. All ICL companies have toxinpoisons permits as required by law and they operate according to the special conditions defined in these permits. Leakage or loss of control of these materials could cause an environmental incident and cause damage to people and/or to the environment. ICL takes measures to prevent such occurrences, and, at the same time, it prepares for such occurrences by means of emergency teams and appropriate equipment for dealing with these types of events.

Europe
Some of the substances used in ICL’s facilities in Europe (such as raw materials, etc.) are considered to be hazardous substances. Required approvals and registrations for these substances are acquired and maintained. Relevant safety measures and procedures for storage and handling are implemented and maintained. In addition to these measures, only qualified suppliers and transport companies are used, and qualification and training of employees are conducted on a regular basis. All requirements based on the GHS (Globally Harmonized System of Classification, Labelling and Packaging of Chemicals) are acquired and maintained.
Americas
Hazardous substances are utilized at ICL’s facilities in Americas as raw materials and can also be found as finished products. Where required, registrations for the storage, handling and transportation of these materials are acquired and maintained. Measures are taken to reduce the likelihood of releases of hazardous materials by way of supplier and transporter qualification, training of employees, contractors and vendors on the proper handling of these materials.
96


C. ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE

 

C. ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE
* A list of our subsidiaries, including name and country of incorporation or residence is provided in an exhibit to our Form 20-F filed with the U.S. Securities Exchange Commission, which can be found at www.sec.gov.

www.sec.gov.

97

D. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT


The Company operates production facilities in its worldwide locations, including the following:

·
Israel: under the Israeli Dead Sea Concession Law, 1961, as amended in 1986 (the “Concession Law”), we have lease rights until 2030 for the salt and carnallite ponds, pumping facilities and productions plants at Sodom. We have other production facilities in Israel, situated on land with a long-termlong‑term lease, including the plants at Mishor Rotem, (mainly leased until 2028 to 2041), the Oron and Zin sites of ICL Phosphate (leased until 2017 to 2024 – negotiations with respect toSolutions segment (Oron is under an extension of several lease agreements are currently underway)process), production facilities at Naot Hovav of ICL Industrial Products segment (leased until 2024 to -2048), as well as production, storage and transportation facilities at Kiryat Ata that belong to ICL Specialty Fertilizers andtogether with chemicals and research laboratories at Kiryat Ata that belong to ICL Specialty Fertilizers and ICL Industrial ProductsInnovative Ag Solutions segment (leased until 2046 to -2049). We also use warehouses and loading and unloading sites at the Ashdod (leased until 2030) and Eilat ports (negotiations are underway to extend the agreement).

We have additional production facilities outside Israel, the main ones being:

·Europe:

Germany: the production plants of ICL Food SpecialtiesPhosphate Solutions segment are at Ludwigshafen, Ladenburg Engelsberg (Rovita) and Hemmingen (Hagesüd). ProductionThe production plants of ICL Advanced AdditivesIndustrial Products segment are at Ladenburg and Cologne.Bitterfeld. All the plants are owned by the ICL Group.

Company.

The Netherlands: the production plants of ICL Industrial Products segment at Terneuzen that are owned aby the Company. A facility of ICL Phosphate Solutions segment in Amsterdam held under a lease until 2034 (or under certain conditions up to 2044) and a production facility in the southern Netherlands is located on land that is partly owned by the Company and partly held under a long-termlong‑term lease.

Spain: the concessions at the potash and salt mines are held under the concession agreements described below. The potash and salt production plant,plants, and the warehouses, as well as the loading and unloading facilities of ICL the Potash & Magnesiumsegment at Catalonia, are owned by the ICL Group. ICL Specialty FertilizersCompany. Innovative Ag Solutions segment also hasowns a liquid fertilizer and soluble fertilizer production plant in Totana, owns another plant for mixing solid fertilizers in Cartagena and has a concession on two ports in Cartagena and Almeriaport until 2024 and 2017, respectively.

2024.

The United Kingdom: the rights to the potashpolyhalite and salt mines are held under the concession agreements described below. The potashpolyhalite and salt and production plants and the warehouses of ICL the Potash & Magnesiumsegment in Cleveland are owned by the ICL Group.Company. The warehouses and bulk loading and unloading facilities at the port are leased until March 2034. The Company owns twoTwo peat moors of Innovative Ag Solutions segment are owned by the Company and leases one and alsois leased. In addition, Innovative Ag Solutions segment owns a plant for producing peat of ICL Specialtygrowing media in the north of the United Kingdom.

Kingdom and another plant in Daventry for producing liquid plant nutrition products.

Belgium: Innovative Ag Solutions segment owns a production facility in Grobbendonk for producing water soluble fertilizers.
Austria: the dairy protein production plant of ICL Food SpecialtiesPhosphate Solutions segment at Hartberg (Prolactal) is owned by ICL Group.

France: production plant of ICL Advanced Additives at Nuevo Leon is owned by the ICL Group

Company.

98

·North and South America:

The

United States: the production plantplants of ICL Industrial Products segment in West Virginia isare mainly owned by the ICL Group.Company. The production plants of ICL Advanced AdditivesPhosphate Solutions segment in Lawrence, Kansas and St. Louis, Missouri are owned by the ICL Group. Rancho Cucamonga, California is leased.Company. The production plants of ICL Specialty FertilizersInnovative Ag Solutions segment in South Carolina are operated under leases ending in 2025 and 2017 (with an option to extend through 2022).

2025.

Mexico: the production plant of ICL Advanced AdditivesPhosphate Solutions segment at CalaisNuevo León is owned by ICL.
Brazil: the ICL Group.

Brazil: production plant of ICL Food Specialties at Sao Jose dos Campos is leased by the ICL Group. Production plants of ICL Advanced AdditivesPhosphate Solutions segment at Sao Jose dos Campos and Cajati are leased by the ICL Group.

Company.
·Asia:

China – phosphate rock mining rights in Haikou Mine and Baitacun Mine are derived from mining licenses that are described below. The scrubbing plant is owned by the companyCompany and situated on leased land.


99

The following table sets forth certain additional information regarding ourICL’s principal properties as at December 31, 2016.

2018.
Property TypeLocationSize (square feet)ProductsOwned/Leased

PlantMishor Rotem, Israel27,524,19427,094,510ICL Phosphate Solutions productsOwned on leased land
PlantMishor Rotem, Israel10,763,910Industrial Products productsOwned on leased land
PlantNeot Hovav, Israel9,601,591Industrial Products products Owned on leased land
PlantZin, Israel8,484,123Phosphate Solutions productsOwned on leased land
PlantKiryat Ata, Israel6,888,903Innovative Ag Solutions productsLeased
PlantOron, Israel4,413,348 (not including phosphate reserve)Phosphate Solutions productsOwned on leased land
     
PlantSodom, Israel13,099,679 (not including ponds and Magnesium factory)ICL Potash & Magnesium productsOwned on leased land
    
PlantMishor Rotem, Israel4,088,80010,763,910ICL Advanced AdditivesMagnesium products (Potash segment)Owned on leased land
    
PlantNeot Hovav, Israel9,601,591ICL Industrial Products products Owned on leased land
PlantZin, Israel8,483,916ICL Phosphate productsOwned on leased land
PlantKiryat Ata, Israel6,888,903ICL Specialty Fertilizers productsLeased
PlantOron, Israel4,413,240 (not including phosphate reserve)ICL Phosphate productsOwned on leased land


PlantSodom, Israel4,088,800Magnesium productsOwned on Leased land
PlantSodom, Israel2,326,060ICL Industrial Products productsOwned on leased land
    
Conveyor beltSodom, Israel1,970,333Transportation facility for ICL Potash & MagnesiumOwned on leased land
    
Pumping stationSodom, Israel920,314Pumping station for ICL Potash & MagnesiumsegmentOwned on leased land
    
Plant667,362Industrial Products productsOwned on leased land
 
PlantPower plantSodom, Israel645,856667,362ICL Advanced Additives productsPower and steam production for Potash segmentOwned on leased land
     
Warehouse and loading facilityAshdod, Israel664,133Warehouse for Essential Minerals segment’sPotash and Phosphate Solutions productsLeased
Power plantSodom, Israel645,856Power and steam production for ICL Potash & MagnesiumOwned on leased land
     
OfficeBeer Sheva, Israel495,883ICL Industrial Products productsOwned
     
PlantMishor Rotem, Israel398,264430,355ICL Advanced AdditivesPhosphate Solutions productsOwned on leased land
100

Warehouse and loading facilityEilat, Israel152,557Warehouse for Essential Minerals segment’sPotash and Phosphate Solutions productsLeased
     
HeadquartersTel Aviv, Israel17,22225,318Company headquartersLeased
     
PlantCatalonia, Spain48,491,416Mines, manufacturing facilities and warehouses for ICL Potash & MagnesiumOwned
     
PlantTotana, Spain2,210,261ICL Specialty FertilizersInnovative Ag Solutions productsOwned

PlantCartagena, Spain209,853ICL Specialty FertilizersInnovative Ag Solutions products Owned
     
Warehouse and loading facilityCartagena, Spain184,342Storage for ICL Specialty Fertilizers productsLeased
PlantMieres (Asturias), Spain41,263ICL Advanced Additives productsOwned 
Warehouse and loading facilityAlmeria, Spain28,761Storage for ICL Specialty FertilizersInnovative Ag Solutions productsLeased
     
PlantJiaxing, China828,017ICL Industrial Products productsOwned on leased land
     
PlantShan Dong, China692,045ICL Industrial Products productsOwned on leased land
     
PlantKunming, Yunnan, China458,394Production Plant of ICL Phosphate SolutionsOwned on leased land
     
PlantLian Yungang, China358,793ICL Industrial Products productsOwned on leased land
     
PlantKunming, Yunnan, China290,420ICL Advanced AdditivesPhosphate Solutions productsOwned on leased land  
     
Pumping stationKunming, Yunnan, China2,231A pumping station for ICL Phosphate SolutionsOwned on leased land
     
Peat MoorNutberry and Douglas Water, United Kingdom17,760,451Peat mine - ICL Specialty Fertilizers-Innovative Ag SolutionsOwned
     
PlantCleveland, United Kingdom13,239,609ICL Potash & MagnesiumPolysulphate products (Potash segment)Owned
     
Peat MoorCreca, United Kingdom4,305,564Peat mine - ICL Specialty FertilizersInnovative Ag SolutionsLeased
     
PlantNutberry, United Kingdom322,917ICL Specialty FertilizersInnovative Ag Solutions productsOwned


PlantDaventry, United Kingdom81,539Innovative Ag solutions productsOwned and leased
PlantTerneuzen, the Netherlands1,206,527ICL Industrial Products productsOwned
     
PlantHeerlen, the Netherlands481,802ICL Specialty FertilizersInnovative Ag solutions productsOwned and leased
     
PlantAmsterdam, the Netherlands349,827ICL Phosphate Solutions products and logistics centerOwned on leased land
     
European HeadquartersAmsterdam, Thethe Netherlands24,22059,055European Company headquartersLeased
     
PlantGallipolis Ferry, West Virginia, United States1,742,400ICL Industrial Products productsOwned
     
PlantLawrence, Kansas, United States179,689ICL Advanced AdditivesPhosphate Solutions productsOwned
     
PlantCarondelet, Missouri, United States172,361ICL Advanced AdditivesPhosphate Solutions productsOwned
PlantRancho Cucamonga, California, United States103,600ICL Advanced Additives productsLeased
     
PlantNorth Charleston, South Carolina, United States60,000100,000ICL Specialty FertilizersInnovative Ag solutions productsLeased
101

PlantSummerville, South Carolina, United States40,000Innovative Ag solutions productsLeased
     
US headquartersSt. Louis, Missouri, United States45,595US Company headquartersLeased
     
PlantLudwigshafen, Germany6,996,541ICL Phosphate Solutions products and InfrastructureOwned
     
PlantLadenburg, Germany1,569,764ICL Advanced Additives and ICL Food SpecialtiesPhosphate Solutions productsOwned
     
PlantBitterfeld, Germany514,031ICL Industrial Products productsOwned
     
PlantEngelsberg, Germany356,823ICL Food Specialties productsOwned


PlantHemmingen, Germany175,042ICL Food SpecialtiesPhosphate Solutions productsOwned
PlantCologne, Germany64,540ICL Advanced Additives productsOwned on leased land
     
PlantCajati, Brazil413,959ICL Advanced AdditivesPhosphate Solutions  productsOwned
     
PlantSao Jose dos Campos, BrazilPhosphate plant: 137,573 Blending plant: 80,729ICL Advanced Additives and ICL Food SpecialtiesPhosphate Solutions productsOwned on (free)(free of charge) leased land
     
PlantBelgium128,693ICL Specialty FertilizersInnovative Ag solutions productsOwned
     
PlantCalais, France483,568546,290ICL Advanced AdditivesIndustrial Products productsOwned
     
PlantNuevo Leon, Mexico152,408ICL Advanced AdditivesPhosphate Solutions  productsOwned
     
PlantBandırma, Turkey375,187ICL Phosphate Solutions productsOwned
     
PlantHartberg, Austria692,937ICL Food SpecialtiesPhosphate Solutions productsOwned
     
PlantHeatherton, Australia64,583ICL Food SpecialtiesPhosphate Solutions productsLeased

102

Other Leases,Licenses and Permits

Well Production Permits

The water supply of water to ICL Dead Sea in the Dead Sea area, is executed via a seriesapproximately 40 drillings, most of wells operated by ICL, bothwhich are located within and outside of the concession area. The Company has lease agreements with Israel Lands Authority (hereinafter – “ILA”) and production permits fromSeven drillings - the Water Authority for these wells. ICL Dead Sea has seven water wells at Ein Ofarim (whichdrillings - are located outside the concession area). Thearea, and ICL Dead Sea is therefore required to sign, from time to time, lease contracts for limited periods for these wells expired in 2009,with the Israel Land Authority (ILA).
Renewal of the contracts is a lengthy process and in the same year an application to extend the lease period was submitted to ILA. Only in the beginning of 2016 were new contracts signed by ILA, for seven years, in place of those that expired in 2009, where effectively such contracts expired shortly before their signing date. ICL Dead Sea has commenced taking actionbeen working for several years to renew these contracts.

the contracts, which expired in 2016.

In December 2016,addition, every new drilling requires a drilling license issued by the plan coveringWater Authority, and at the southern ponds received validitybeginning of every year the Water Authority issues ICL Dead Sea with a water production license that defines the production capacity of each drilling. There is no guarantee that the Water Authority will issue ICL Dead Sea a water production license or that the Water Authority will amend the production license if ICL Dead Sea will exceed the production capacity for such drilling.
During 2017, a revision was made to the Water Law whereby monetary charges will be imposed on private water producers in respect of water drawn from the District Council.wells, subject to the quality of the water and other factors. The plan permits receiptmeaning of building permitsthe legislative revision for ICL Dead Sea is imposition of costs for the entire areawells, from which ICL Dead Sea has drawn water up to now with no additional charge beyond its actual costs of drawing the water. The Company is examining application of the ponds, south of Pond 3, and thus permits arrangementrevision on ICL Dead Sea, in light of the historical activitiesConcession Law that applies to the Company and relevant for the wells located in the concession area. If the revision to the Law does apply to wells located in the concession area, in the Company’s estimation, the monetary impact on this area.

the Company is not expected to be material. 

Business Licenses and Other Permits

In November 2013 a reform in the Business Licensing Law, 5728-19681968 came into effect, providing, among other things, that business licenses in Israel will no longer be perpetual, but rather each business license will be valid for a term of between one and fifteen years, depending on the type of activity covered by the license. In addition, licensable activities in accordance with the Business License Ordinance (Licensable Businesses), 5773-2013,2013, will be subject to unified specifications to be issued by the authorities as specified in the Ordinance, including the Ministry of Environmental Protection.

Up to now, we have been issued valid business licenses for our sites in Israel in perpetuity, in accordance with the law. Under the abovementioned reform, all of our business licenses will expire and require renewal three years after the applicable “Unified Specifications” are published, and after receiving a notification from the Licensing Authority, except those issued to power stations and fertilizer storage facilities that currently hold a permanent business license, and which will remain in perpetuity.

In addition, our sites in Israel have valid toxic substance permits under the Israeli Hazardous Materials Law, 5753-1993.1993. These permits were issued by the Ministry of Environmental Protection for a period of one year. Renewal of these permits is performed on an ongoing basis. The toxic substances permit issued to Bromine Compounds sets forth additional conditions, including requirements of risk management and seismic surveys in accordance with the Ministry’s guidelines.

The

Industrial Products plant in Neot Hovav discharges industrial wastewater into the evaporation ponds in accordance with the requirements of the plant’s business license. The costs of renewal of these licenses are not material.

licenses.

103

Periclase plant in Mishor Rotem has a valid permit for discharging brine into the Dead Sea (valid up to 2021).
ICL Haifa has a valid permit for discharging industrial wastewater into the Kishon River.

ICL’s plants at Mishor Rotem and At the end of November 2018, ICL Haifa received a permission to drill to the underground water in order to channel the treated wastewater into the underground water, a solution which is accepted by the authorities.

ICL Dead Sea havehas a valid permitspermit for discharging industrial wastewater into the Dead Sea (valid up to 2020), under the Israeli Prevention of Sea Pollution from Land-BasedLand‑Based Sources Law, (1988). ICL Magnesium has a permit to discharge1988.
Commencing from December 2017, discharging of wastewater from the magnesium plant into the sea (valid upDead Sea was discontinued and, thus, the permit for discharging of wastewater into the Sea, which had been issued by the Ministry of Environmental Protection, became superfluous.
The Ministry of Environmental Protection is expected to 2021). The permits require renewal towards the endadd further conditions regarding discharge of wastewater, as part of the period of validity. The costs of renewalterms of the licenses arebusiness license. At this stage, it is not material.

possible to estimate what the additional conditions will be or the impact thereof.

The companies also hold emissions permits under the Israeli Clean Air Law, 2008 (the “Clean Air Law”).

As part of the production process in Rotem Amfert Israel, the Company builds and operates ponds that accumulate phosphogypsum water created in the production processes. For additional information relating the ponds’ permits for construction and operation, see Note 20 to our Audited Financial Statements, “Item 3 - Key Information— D. Risk Factors”.
ICL operates in accordance with conditions set out in the licenses and permits. If there is any discrepancy in respect of the requirements of these conditions, the Company takes action to remedy the discrepancy in coordination with the Ministry of Environmental Protection. During 2016, a discrepancy was found regarding compliance with some of the requirements of ICL Magnesium’s emissions permit, due to an apparent delinquency in completion thereof. The Company is holding discussions with the Ministry of Environmental Protection regarding possible ways of resolving the discrepancy mentioned above.

Mineral Extraction and Mining Operations

ICL’s mining activities are dependent on concessions, authorizations and permits granted by the governments of the countries in which the mines are located.

In consideration of the concessions, ICL pays royalties and taxes to the governments of Israel, China, UK and Spain. Below are the royalties amounts paid in 2018, 2017 and 2016: 
IsraelTotal in IsraelOut of IsraelTotal
Year Ended December 31,$ millions

201871*621334137
201764*681324136
201658-58967


*In 2018 and 2017, the Company paid additional amounts of $62 million and $68 million, respectively in respect of royalties in Israel relating to prior periods. For additional information regarding royalties paid for prior periods, see Note 20 to our Audited Financial Statements.
104

Following is a description of the material properties from which ICL extracts minerals and conducts mining. For additional information regarding the total cost of the Company’s property, plant and equipment and its intangible assets (including concession and mining rights) see Note 11 and Note 12, respectively, to the Company's audited financial statements.

our Audited Financial Statements.

The Dead Sea

The concentration of the minerals extracted from the Dead Sea (including potash bromine, table salt, magnesia oxide, magnesium chloride and metal magnesium)bromide), constituting the raw materialmaterials for production, is on the rise due to the hydrological deficit the Dead Sea has been experiencing during the past ten40 years.

ICL’s extraction of minerals from the Dead Sea begins with an evaporation process facilitated by the hot and dry desert climate of the Dead Sea region, which is the lowest point on the earth’s surface – about 430 meters below sea level.surface. Due to the hydrological deficit, the sea is declining at the rate of 1.1 meters per year and is now about 430 meters below sea level. As a result of the said decline, the Dead Sea is divided into two parts: the natural Northern Basin and the Southern Basin, on the basis of which dams were installed and artificial evaporation ponds were constructed.

The production process begins with the flowing of water from the Northern Basin into the evaporation ponds (a distance of about 12 kilometers). The Company’s pumping station P-88P‑88 has a pumping capacity of 100,000 cubic meters per hour. In 2016,2018, ICL flowed approximately 420 million cubic meters of water from the Northern Basin into the evaporation ponds. Ofponds, of this quantity, approximately 270260 million cubic meters of brine were rechanneled into the Northern Basin of the Dead Sea at the end of the process. In 2016,2018, the Company produced from the Dead Sea approximately 3.73.8 million metric tonstonnes of potash, 162approximately 175 thousand metric tonstonnes of bromine, 2321 thousand metric tonstonnes of metal magnesium, 240187 thousand metric tonstonnes of salt and 107132 thousand metric tonstonnes of solid magnesium chloride solids.chloride. The Company plans to buildbuilt a new pumping station (hereinafter – the P‑9 Pumping Station) from the Northern Basin to the evaporation ponds, as partthis being in light of our preparations for the receding level of the Dead Sea in the Northern Basin and the retirement of pumping station P-88P‑88 from service.service due to the receding water level. The Company made an additional investment and extended the life of the present pumping station (P‑88) so that it will be able to function up to 2021. In 2017, the Board of Directors approved the investment in construction of the P‑9 Pumping Station. In 2017 and 2018, DSW signed agreements with several execution and infrastructure companies, in a total amount of $160 million (out of the total project cost of about $250 million), for construction of the P-9 Pumping Station. The new power stationP-9 Pumping Station is scheduledexpected to commence its operation in place ofduring the old power station duringyear 2020.


In 2015, an appeal was filed in the Israeli Court for Water Matters by Man Nature and LawAdam Teva V’Din - Israeli Association for Environmental Protection (ATD) wherein the Court was requested to order the Government Water and Sewage Authority to issue a production license to DSW pursuant to the Water Law with respect to the transfer of water from the North Basin of the Dead Sea to the evaporation ponds in the Sea’s South Basin in order to regulate and supervise, within the framework of the production license, transfer of the water, as stated, in connection with certain aspects, including limitation of the quantities transferred. Recently,In August 2016, the Government Water and Sewage Authority issued directives to DSW (not in the framework of the production license), after hearing the latter’s position, regarding transfer of the water, as stated, which included reference to quantities and reporting requirements. In January 2017, the Court rejected the appeal. On January 30, 2017, Man Nature and Law filed an appeallimitations on the Court’s decision,quantities of water transferred, as stated.well as mechanisms for reporting of pumping volume. As at the reporting date, summaries have been filed by all the parties and the case is waiting for the Court's judgement. In the Company’s estimation, the legal proceedings in this matter will end without material influence on its operations. For additional details –information, see “Item 4. Information on the Company-D. Property, Plant and Equipment-Leases, Licenses and Permits-Well Production Permits”.

Note 20 to our Audited Financial Statements.

105

The evaporation ponds extend over an area of approximately 150 square kilometers and are divided into two sub-systemssub‑systems – an array of ponds for sinking salt (mineral waste from the production process), and a series of ponds for sinking carnallite (the target mineral constituting a raw material for production of potash).

The salt pond known as Pond 5 is the largest pond in the series of ponds, having an area of approximately 80 square kilometers. Pond 5 was built during the 1960s by construction of a large dam, where in the center of the dyke surrounding it isa partition (separation clay core) was installed for sealing material (clay).and prevention of potential leakage of solutions. This dam demarks the southernSouthern basin of the Dead Sea on the Israeli side and permitsallowed the continued existence of the Southern Basin due to the system of pumping stations and flowing channels that are operated as part of the industrial operational system of the evaporation ponds. In order to continue and operate Pond 5, the dyke was raised several times during the last 50 years. In 2013 ICL Dead Sea completed the cut off project that aimed to minimize the seepage from the Northern pond. As part of the project sheet piles were inserted up to the depth of 33 meters to the ground along the length of 18.6 km. The evaporation processes give rise to concentration of the brines and the sinking of the table salt to the floor of the pond. The remaining brines are rich in potash, magnesium and bromide. These brines are pumped into the systems of other ponds, and as a result of the continued evaporation, the "carnallite" precipitates. Carnallite is the raw material used for production of potash, metal magnesium chlorine and magnesium chloride.chlorine. The carnallite is harvested by floating barges and is sent as slurry to our production plants. The brine from the edge of the carnallite ponds is used as a raw material in the production of bromine.

bromine and magnesium chloride.

About 20 million tonstonnes of tablesea salt precipitates every year and creates a layer of approximately 20 centimeters on the floor of Pond 5. Precipitation of the salt causes a reduction in the volume of the solutions in the pond. As the production process requires maintaining a fixed volume of solutions (brines) in the pond, the water level of the solutions in the pond is raised accordingly by approximately 20 centimeters annually.

each year according to the rate at which the pool floor rises.

The Ein Boqeq and Hamei Zohar hotels, the townsettlement of Neve Zohar and other facilities and infrastructures are located on the western beach of the Pond. Raising the water level of the Pond above a certain level is likely to cause structural damage to the foundations and the hotel buildings situated close to the water’s edge, to the settlement of Neve Zohar and to other infrastructures located along the western shoreline of the Pond. This situation requires establishment of defenses for the facilities and infrastructures of the hotels located on the shores of the Pond.

The project for construction of the temporarycoastline defenses with respect to the hotels and infrastructures on the coastline of the Pond has been underway for several years and asyears. As part of such defenses, from time to time, the dyke along the western beachfront of the Pond, across from the hotels, is raised, together with, in many places, a system for lowering subterranean water. As at the date of the report, the construction work with respect to the hotels coastline is complete, and the related dykes have been raised to accommodate the maximal brine level (15.1 meters). The current brine level is 14.6 meters. Nevertheless, there is additional ongoing work on raising the roads level along pond 5.
There is an agreement between DSW and the Government of Israel that the Company will bear 39.5% of the costs of financing the temporarycoastline defenses and the Government will finance the balance thereof.


The interim defenses have not yet been fully completed, however the dykes have been raised to a level that permits raising of the water level up to a height of 15.1 meters, subject to approval of the plenary Committee for National Infrastructures, in a number of phases, on the way to the final raising.

In July 2012, an agreement was signed with the Government of Israel, regarding "Execution and Funding of the Dead Sea Works Protection Project and Increase of the Royalties Paid to the State" (hereinafter – "thethe Salt Harvesting Project")Project). The purpose of the Salt Harvesting Project is to provide a permanent solution for the raising of the water level in the Pond and stabilizing of the water therein at a fixed level by harvesting of the salt from this pond and transferring it to the Northern Basin of the Dead Sea.

106

The highlights of the agreement are set forth below:

A.
A.     The planning and execution of the Salt Harvesting Project will be performed by DSW.

B.The Salt Harvesting Project as well as the project for the new pumping station that is to be constructed, constitute an Israeli national infrastructure project that will be promoted by the Israeli Committee for National Infrastructures(Transfer of the pumping station from P-88 to P-9 constitutes part of the project recognized as a national infrastructure project).

C.Starting from January 1, 2017, the water level in the pond will not rise above 15.1 meters in DSW’s network (about 390 meters below sea level). DSW will be required to pay compensation in respect of any damages caused as a result of a rise of the water level beyond the level determined. In the case of a material deviation from the timetables for execution of the Salt Harvesting Project as a result of a requirement for changes by the planning institutions, as a result of which the Plan is not approved on time, or due a decision of a judicial tribunal that caused a delay of at least one year in provision of effect to the Salt Harvesting Project by the planning institutions, without the Company having violated its obligations, the Company will be permitted to request raising of the water level above that stated above.

In December 2015, National Infrastructures Plan 35A (hereinafter – “the Plan”), was approved by the National Infrastructures Committee, which includes the statutory infrastructure of the Salt Harvesting Project will be performed by DSW.

B.    The Salt Harvesting Project as well as the project infor the evaporation ponds through, among other things, the construction of a new pumping station that is to be constructed (hereinafter – the P-9 Pumping Station), constitute an Israeli national infrastructure project that will be promoted by the Israeli Committee for National Infrastructures.
C.    Starting from January 1, 2017, the water level in the northern basinpond will not rise above 15.1 meters in DSW’s network (about 390 meters below sea level). DSW will be required to pay compensation in respect of any damages caused, if at all, as a result of a rise of the Dead Sea.water level beyond the level determined. In March 2016,the case of a material deviation from the timetables for the execution of the Salt Harvesting Project as a result of a requirement for changes by the planning institutions, as a result of which the Plan is not approved on time, or due to a decision of a judicial tribunal that caused a delay of at least one year in provision of effect to the Salt Harvesting Project by the planning institutions, without the Company having violated its obligations, the Company will be permitted to request raising of the water level above that stated above.
D.    Increase in the rate of the royalties from 5% to 10% of sales, for quantities of chloride potash DSW sells in excess of 1.5 million tonnes annually. This increase applies to sales starting January 1, 2012. In July 2012, as part of the agreement, the Government also approvedcommitted that at this time it sees no need to make additional changes to its specific fiscal policy regarding mining from the Plan. Withquarries at the approvalDead Sea, including the commercial utilization thereof and, accordingly, at this time, it will not initiate and will even object to, as applicable, proposed laws regarding this matter. The Company’s consent to the increase of the statutory plan,rate of the Companyroyalties is preparing forcontingent on implementation of the projectGovernment of Israel’s decision.
The agreement further provides that if legislation is enacted that changes the specific fiscal policy in connection with profits or royalties deriving from mining of quarries from the Dead Sea, the Company’s consent to the increase of royalties' rate on the surplus quantities referred to above will not apply, after the enactment of the legislation, to the period in which such additional tax is collected as stated in the said legislation. In January 2016, the Law for Taxation of Profits from Natural Resources, which includes the Sheshinski Committee’s recommendations that address royalties and it believes it will be abletaxation of excess profits from Dead Sea minerals (hereinafter – the Law), entered into effect. Accordingly, the rate of the royalties' provision was update to comply with the plan.

5%.

D.Increase in the rate of the royalties from 5% to 10% of sales, for quantities of chloride potash DSW sells in excess of 1.5 million tons annually. This increase applies to sales starting January 1, 2012. In addition, in respect of the period January 1, 2010 through January 1, 2012, the Company agreed to an additional royalty charge, at the rate of 5%, only on annual sales exceeding 3.0 million tons.

E.In July 2012, as part of the agreement, the Government committed that at this time it sees no need to make additional changes to its specific fiscal policy regarding mining from the quarries at the Dead Sea, including the commercial utilization thereof and, accordingly, at this time, it will not initiate and will even object to, as applicable, proposed laws regarding this matter. The Company’s consent to the increase of the rate of the royalties, as stated in E above, is contingent on implementation of the Government of Israel’s decision, as stated in this Section. The agreement further provides that if legislation is enacted that changes the specific fiscal policy in connection with profits or royalties deriving from mining of quarries from the Dead Sea, the Company’s consent will not apply regarding increase in the rate of royalties on the surplus quantities referred to above, commencing from the date on which additional tax is collected as pursuant to the said legislation. In November 2015, the Economic Efficiency Law was published, including implementation of the Sheshinski Committee’s recommendations, which address royalties and taxation of excess profits from Dead Sea minerals. The law entered into effect on January 1, 2016.

The Company will bear 80% and the Government will bear 20% of the cost of the Salt Harvesting Project, however the Government's share will not exceed NIS 1.4 billion.

Approval of each

107

In 2015 and in 2016, the National Infrastructures Committee and the Israeli Government, respectively, approved National Infrastructures Plan 35A (hereinafter – the Plan), which includes the statutory infrastructure for establishment of the stagesSalt Harvesting Project in Pond 5, and construction of the plan by the relevant dates set outP-9 pumping station in the project schedule is essential for continuation of ICL Dead Sea’s productionprocess and delays could have an unfavorable impact on the process and, accordingly, could give rise to damage or losses.

Constructionnorthern basin of the new partitionDead Sea. As at the date of the report, the building permits for the Salt Harvesting Project and the P-9 pumping station have been received and the construction work has commenced. The P-9 pumping station is expected to commence its operations during 2020. For further information see item A above relating commitments.

In April 2017, after receiving all the permits for execution of the Salt Harvesting with the Government of Israel, ICL’s Board of Directors approved a budget of about $280 million to further proceed with the execution of the Salt Harvesting in the middleDead Sea. This budget will be executed over the next 12 years and constitutes ICL’s share (80%) in the cost of performing this part. In October 2017, DSW signed an agreement, the cost of which for ICL is $280 million, for the execution of the dike surrounding Pond 5 wasfirst stage of the Salt Harvesting Project, with a contracting company Holland Shallow Seas Dredging Ltd., which includes, among others, the construction of a special dredger that is designed to execute the salt harvesting. The dredger is expected to enter into service towards the end of 2019. By then, the engineering and operational preparations and the extensive infrastructure works that have been underway during the past few years are planned to be completed in 2014. The objective of this project isand the salt harvesting operations are expected to minimize seepage from the dike. This project includes raising the dike by an additional meter.

begin.

The receding level of the Dead Sea is not to be confused with the rise of the water level in Pond 5 discussed above, and the two seemingly contradictory phenomena are occurring simultaneously, as Pond 5 is located in the Southern Basin on a different plane than the main body of the sea lying to its north, necessitating a special pumping station to constantly feed the pond with water. See “Item 3.3 - Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business-A Construction of a new pumping station will beis required due to the receding water level in the Northern Basinnorthern basin of the Dead Sea.”Sea”. While the water level of Pond 5 is rising due to the accumulation of salt on its floor and the continuous pumping of water from the Northern Basin of the Dead Sea, the water level of the Northern Basin is receding. As a result of the decline inof the Dead Sea level, sinkholes appear and there is an erosion of Nahal Arava.appear. The appearance of sinkholes which is attributed mainly to the lowering of the water level of the Dead Sea, is increasing in the Dead Sea area.area is increasing over the years. Most of the sinkholes caused by the receding level of the Dead Sea develop nearin the Northern Basin of the Sea, where there is little operation by ICL Potash and Magnesium. Nonetheless, mostDead Sea. However, the development of the sinkholes have appeared near the evaporation ponds and in other places in theareas where ICL Dead Sea area. Development offacilities exist can cause significant damage. In recent years there has been a sinkhole under a dike could cause the dike to burst, causing loss of the solutions in the pond. ICL takes actions to identify thesteady development of these sinkholes in the area of the plant and alongfeeding channel, through which water is pumped from the dikes,Northern Basin to the Southern Basin. ICL Dead Sea takes actions to monitor the development of these sinkholes and to fill them when they appear.

Furthermore

Additional risk factor is the erosion of Nahal Arava, which flows along the international border between Israel and Jordan. This erosion could endanger the stability of the eastern dykes in the future in the array of salt and carnallite ponds. The Company is endeavoring to analyze the matter and to find solutions for preventing or retarding this occurrence in the long term. During 2017, theThe Company will carryis carrying on ongoing monitoring and taketaking action on the site in order to protect the dykes. In addition, ICL Potash and Magnesium intends to execute a preliminary project, in order to examine possible solutions and alternatives.

alternatives

108

ICL owns and operates a power station with a capacity of 110 megawatts, presently limited to about 60 megawatts due to environmental protection restrictions, which provides a significant part of the power used in the production plants at the Dead Sea. The balance is purchased from Israel Electric Company, a state-owned utility, and from OPC, a private producer of electricity that is a related party.


In June 2012, the Company entered into agreements regarding a project to constructstarted the construction of a new cogeneration power station (EPC) in Sodom, Israel (hereinafter – ‘‘the Station’)Station). The Station will havehas a production capacity of about 330 tonstonnes of steam per hour and about 230 megawatt hours,MW, which will supply electricity and steam requirements for the production plants at the Sodom site and for third-partythird party customers. In August 2018, the process of certification approval was completed, and the Power Station started operating in full. The Company intends to operate the new Station concurrently with the existing power station, which will be operatedcontinue operating on a partial basis in a "hot back-up"back‑up" format, for production of electricity and steam. The total power produced at both stations can reach up to 245 MW. The Plant is producing as designed and exporting surplus electricity production insold to third parties via the short term will be about 245 megawatt hours. The Company also intendsNational Grid. Regarding to utilize its present gas contracts and thereafter to enter into new gas contracts in order to run the Station.

Constructionconstruction agreement of the Station, was expected to be completed in light of the second half of 2015. In 2015,continued violations by the executing contractor (the Spanish Company "Abengoa") experienced- Abengoa), in September 2017, the Company notified of the cancellation of the agreement. Due to financial difficulties. In October 2016, the Spanish court approved a debt arrangementdisputes between the executing contractorCompany and its creditors which permitted continuation of its activitiesAbengoa, in the power station project. In light of that stated,November 2018, the Company expects to completeannounced the construction and to commence operationinitiation of an arbitration proceeding, in accordance with the provisions of the Stationagreement.

In the Company's estimate, the damages caused by Abengoa amounted to about euro 77 million (about $ 84 million). On January 30, 2019, Abengoa submitted its response, denying ICL's claims, and claiming a payment of euro 15 million ($17 million) for the contract's termination, which was, allegedly, done unlawfully and for convenience. As at the date of the report, considering the early stages of the proceedings, there is a difficulty in estimating the first halfchances of 2017, with additional costs that are not material.

the outcome.

Transport from the Company's plant in the Dead Sea is by means of a conveyor belt from the plant to the railway in the direction of the Ashdod port and from Highway 90 in the direction of the Eilat port.


The Negev Desert

ICL currently operateoperates large surface phosphate mining sites at Oron, Rotem and Zin, which are located in the southern part of the State of Israel in the Negev region. The Israeli Minister of National InfrastructuresEnergy under the Israeli Mines Ordinance, through the Supervisor of Mines in his Office (“the Supervisor”), has decided to extend the area of the Rotem field concession (valid until the end of the 2021) so that it covers the Hatrurim field. The area of the Rotem concession has been so extended, and the matter has been transferred to the Israel LandsLand Authority (“ILA”) to deal with the extension of the area of the mining permit for the Rotem field, in line with the extension of the concession area.

The Company is working to promote the plan for mining phosphates in Barir field (which is located in the southsouthern part of South Zohar field) in the Negev Desert. In December 2015, the National Planning and Building Council (hereinafter – the National Council) approved the Policy Document regarding Mining and Quarrying of Industrial Minerals, (hereinafter – “the Policy Document”), which includes, among other things,included a recommendation to permit phosphate mining in the Barir field. The Policy Document that was approved will serve as the basis for preparation of a national outline plan (hereinafter – “the National Outline Plan”) for mining and quarrying, which is also to be submitted for approval by the National Planning and Building Council. Along with the approval of the Policy Document, the National Planning and Building Council instructed the Planning Administration to raise the matter of the directive to prepare a detailed plan for the Barir Field at one of its upcoming meetings.

In the beginning of 2016, the National Outline Plan (NOP 14B), which includes the South Zohar field, was submitted for comments by the various committees, which provided their comments and recommendations toward the end of 2016. On February 14, 2017, a hearing was held by the Committee for Principle Planning Matters, whereat decisions were made with respectdecided to the continuedcontinue advancement of the mining in the South Zohar field. Concurrently, and based on a decision of the National Planning and Building Board,Council, instructions were prepared by the competent authorities with respect to the performance of an environmental survey of the Barir field for purposes of its further advancement. TheIn April 2017, the National Council recommended to the government to approve National Outline Plan (hereinafter – NOP 14B), which includes South Zohar field, and determined that Barir field will be advanced as part of a detailed National Outline Plan, which was approved by the government’s Housing Cabinet in January 2018.

109

In January 2018, the Minister of Health filed an appeal of the said instructions are expectedapproval, requiring compliance with the Ministry of Health’s recommendation to be broughtconduct a survey regarding the health impact in each site included in NOP 14B. As part of a discussion regarding the appeal, which was held in the Housing Cabinet, it was decided, with the consent of the Ministries of Health, Finance and Energy, to remove the appeal and to approve the NOP 14B. In addition, it was decided to establish a team with representatives of the ministries of Treasury, Health, Transportation, Environmental Protection and Energy, which will present to the Housing Cabinet a report that includes health aspects for approvalNOP 14B. In April 2018, the NOP 14B was formally published.
In July 2018, a petition was submitted to the Israeli Supreme Court of Justice by the municipality of Arad against the National Planning and Building Board during 2017. Council, the Ministry of Health, the Ministry of Environmental Protection and Rotem, to revoke the approval of NOP 14B. In January 2019, residents of the Bedouin diaspora in the "Arad Valley" submitted a petition to the High Court of Justice (hereinafter – the Court) against the National Council, the Government of Israel and Rotem, in which the Court was requested to cancel the provisions of NOP 14B and the decision of the National Council from December 5, 2017, regarding to the advancement of a detailed plan for phosphate mining in the South Zohar field. In addition, the Court was requested to issue an interim injunction preventing the implementation of the NOP 14B instructions and the National Council's said decision until a final resolution. On January 22, 2019, the Supreme Court consolidated the hearing of the petition together with the other petition filed against NOP 14B and decided that at this stage there is no basis for granting the interim injunction. On February 5, 2019, the Company filed its response.
For a description of certain risks relating to receipt of a license for mining in the Barir Field, see ”Item 3.“Item 3 - Key Information–D–Information— D. Risk Factors”.

Each of the said fields in Israel has a similar layered structure and geological composition, with the phosphate preserved as relatively thin layers along the margins and within the axes of two northeast to southwest trending asymmetrical synclines (basins or trough-shapedtrough‑shaped folds). Oron and Rotem lie within a single syncline located northwest of the Zin syncline. The three deposits have been proved over extensive distances in terms of length (Rotem 10 kilometers, Oron 16 kilometers and Zin 22 kilometers) and width (4 kilometers each). They are all known to extend further in terms of length but are limited in operational size. The Campanian (Upper Cretaceous period) phosphate rock deposits of Israel are part of the Mediterranean phosphate belt extending from Turkey, through Jordan and Israel, and westward through Egypt, Tunisia and Morocco. The Company began operations at Oron in the 1950s and at Rotem and Zin in the 1970s. These sites are accessible by road and rail. ICL has long-termlong‑term leases covering all the land on which its Israeli facilities are located, and it operates under mining concessions and licenses granted to it by the Israeli Minister of National InfrastructuresEnergy and by the ILA. Regarding Oron, its long-term lease is under a renewal process. See “Item 4.4 - Information on the Company–B. Business Overview–Company— D. Property, Plant and Equipment— Concessions and Mining Rights” below.

.

If the National Planning and Building Council approves the mining in the Barir Field, progress is expected with respect to the process of receipt of a mining license. If this situation does not come about, the future of the activities of the ICL Rotem Company will depend on its ability to mine and manufacture the downstream products from alternative phosphate sources, namely, brown phosphates and bituminous phosphates, which are essentially the only phosphate sources that are expected to become reserves in the near future. Currently, the reserve of bituminous phosphate (approximately 3.5 million tonnes at Zin) is being mined and used in a blending process with other phosphates having lower organic concentrations to produce fertilizer products. Over the past several years, the Company has been developing a process, and has even run a pilot and a manufacturing test, wherein after the improvement process (removal of the phosphorous from the material combined with it) there is an improvement of the phosphoric acid content from 25%–26% to 31%–32%, a 50% reduction of the organic material content and the possibility of usage for production of high-quality phosphoric acid. Significant progress has also been made in adapting brown phosphates (the adaptation of which for manufacture of acid has been proven in the past by means of a thermal process) for manufacture of phosphoric acid – a successful pilot was held and as a result a facility test is planned.

In November 2016, the District Board for the Southern District approved a detailed site plan for mining phosphate in the Zin-OronZin‑Oron area. This plan, which covers an area of about 350 square kilometers, will permit the continued mining of phosphate located in the Zin valley and in the Oron valley for a period of 25 years or up to exhaustion of the raw material – whichever occurs first, with the possibility for extension (under the authority of the District Planning Board).

110

The method of mining in the Negev is by the conventional open pit method, using drilling and blasting, hydraulic excavators and rigid dump trucks or dozers with rippers for overburden removal and front-end loaders and trucks for mining phosphate. Each mine site has varying numbers and thicknesses of over-burden, inter-burdenover‑burden, inter‑burden and phosphate rock layers, so that the size of the mining equipment is conformed to the mining sites and the operating requirements. In all of the mines, stripping of the waste material and mining of the phosphate are performed by entirely conventional methods, where in the Rotem mine the activities include independent teams of190-metric tonne trucks, wheel loaders with a loading capacity of 14 cubic meters per bucket, and excavators having a bucket digging capacity of 21 cubic meters as well as teams of contractors with excavators having a digging capacity of 3 to 10 cubic meters per bucket along with trucks have capacity of 20 to 100 tonnes. The Oron and Zin sites use contractors for all operations, and the equipment at these sites is smaller. Typically, the excavator bucket capacities are in the range of 3 to 8 cubic meters and the trucks have capacity of 20 to 100 metric tonnes.

methods.

Phosphate rock from the Rotem mine is transported by truck to a nearby beneficiation plant at Mishor Rotem. OnIn addition, on this site, we also operate two sulfuricsulphuric acid plants, three  green phosphoric acid plants, one white phosphoric acid plant, three superphosphate plants, two granular fertilizer plants, one MKP plant and one oil shale burning plant for production of electricity and steam. We also have beneficiation plants at both Oron and Zin. The product of the process is a high-grade, multi-purposehigh‑grade, multi‑purpose phosphate product, most of which is used to produce phosphoric acid and fertilizers. The rest of this material is sold to other phosphoric acid and fertilizer producers and some is sold for direct application as fertilizer.

producers.

The plant at Mishor Rotem is powered primarily by electricity generated by the Company at its sulfuricsulphuric acid plants and by oil shale that the Company mines in Mishor Rotem. Any surplus power is sold to Israel Electric Company. All of the power utilized by the Oron and Zin beneficiation plants is purchased from OPC, a private, related-party producer of electricity.

the grid.

The following table sets forth for the periods indicated the amount of our total mine production of raw ore in the Company’s mines in the Negev (and the relevant grade) supplied to our beneficiation plants:

 Year Ended December 31,
 201620152014
Millions of metric tons produced 9 97
Grade (% P2O5 before/after beneficiation)32/2632/2632/26
    

The following table sets forth (forplants, for the three years ended December 31, 2016, 2015,2018, 2017 and 2014)2016:

 Year Ended December 31,
 201820172016
Millions of metric tonnes produced
 8 7 9
Grade (% P2O5 before/after beneficiation)
26/3226/3226/32

The following table sets forth the approximate amounts of product produced after processing by our operations in the Negev Desert:

 Year Ended December 31,
 201620152014
 thousands of metric tonnesthousands of metric tonnesthousands of metric tonnes
Phosphate Rock 3,947 3,8483,357
Green Phosphoric Acid 602 600475
Fertilizers 890 641729
White Phosphoric Acid 161 153121
MKP 47 5248
    

Desert, for the three years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016:

 Year Ended December 31,
 201820172016
 
thousands of
metric tonnes
thousands of
metric tonnes
thousands of
metric tonnes
Phosphate Rock 3,550 3,332 3,947
Green Phosphoric Acid 560 575 602
Fertilizers 988 957 890
White Phosphoric Acid 162 148 161
MKP 70 68 47


111

Spain

The Company's potash mining operations in Spain are carried out by ICL Iberia (IBP) (a wholly-ownedwholly‑owned subsidiary of the Company) through Trafico de Mercancias (a wholly-ownedwholly‑owned subsidiary of ICL Iberia). As at the date of this Annual Report, there are three underground potash mines that make up ICL Iberia’s complex: Suria, CabanasasCabanasses and Vilafruns. TheCurrently, the Company operates two mines, the CabanasasCabanasses mine, which is located in the town of Suria, approximately 12 kilometers north of the district capital of Manresa in the CardonerCardener river valley, and the Vilafruns mine, which is located in the town of Sallent, approximately 13 kilometers east of Suria in the Llobregat river valley. The third mine in Suria is inactive. In addition, the Vilafruns mine is expected to be closed by the middle of 2017. In November 2015, ICL Iberia signed a memorandum agreement for joint cooperation with the Government of Catalonia (hereinafter – “the Agreement”) that defines ICL Iberia’s activities in the country as preferential activities and the potash industry as a strategic public interest. The purpose of the agreement is, among other things, to arrange ICL Iberia's obligation to remove the salt pile on the Sallent site, including completion of the restoration plan of the site (see below) – all of which is to be completed no later than 2070 (removal of the salt pile is to be completed by 2065). At the end of 2016, a preliminary draft of the agreement was provided by the Government of Catalonia to all the parties involved for their comments. In February 2017, ICL Iberia submitted a request for approval of additional alternative solutions regarding the manner of handling the salt pile and extension of the period of the activities on the Sallent site beyond June 30, 2017. As at the date of the report, ICL Iberia's environmental mining license, had not yet been renewed by the Government of Catalonia. See “Item 8. Financial Information—A. Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information—Legal Proceedings—Spain Mining License Matters.”


As part of the expansion plan in Spain on the Suria site, production of potash at the Cabanasas mine is expected to increase up to approximately 0.8 million tons per annum when production at the Vilafruns mine ceases and is expected to reach approximately 1.1 million tons per annum (double the current levels produced in the Cabanasas mine) two years after production at Vilafruns ceases. In the third stage, mining of the potash is expected to increase up to about 1.3 million tons per year in the future. ICL owns all of the land on which the Spanish surface facilities are located. See Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—Segment Information— ICL Potash - Production.”

The Spanish government owns all of the underground mining rights and has granted ICL concessions to conduct mining operations under the land. See “Item 4. Information on the Company — D. Property, Plants and Equipment – Concessions and Mining Rights — Spain” below. 

The Cabanasas and Vilafruns mines are both in the province of Barcelona and are located approximately 530 to 900 meters below ground. Each mine has two access points and the mining is by a modified room and pillar method. All of the mine sites are served by roads and are near major highways.

Extraction of potash from underground mines in Spain is carried out by mining sylvinite (a mixture of potash and salt found in varying potash concentrations). The potash is separated from the salt in production plants near the mines. For a description of our efficiency plan at ICL Iberia (IBP), see “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—Segment Information— ICL Potash—Production.”

Potash was first discovered in 1912 at Suria and commercial development was started in 1920. ICL purchased its three Spanish mines in 1998. Potash of late Eocene age occurs in the northeast corner of the Ebro Evaporite Basin which lies along the southern flank of the Pyrenees. Sylvinite and carnallite are found towards the top of the Cardona Halite at depths which vary considerably as a result of deformations associated with the Pyrenean fold and thrust belt.
The Cabanasses and Vilafruns mines are both in the province of Barcelona and are located approximately 530 to 1000 meters below ground. Each mine has two access points and the mining is by a modified room and pillar method. All the mine sites are served by roads/railways and are near major highways.
Extraction of potash from underground mines in Spain is carried out by mining sylvinite (a mixture of potash and salt found in varying potash concentrations). The potash layers (in their underground form) can,is separated from the salt in places, be contorted on a local scale due toproduction plants near the said deformation of the area. Two main potash seams are mined in the Capa A and Capa B deposits at both the Vilafruns and Cabanasas mines. Within these seams, sylvinite occurs in the joining of thin layers of halite in each of the seams. The sylvinite is high grade and with very low levels of insolubles.

The Company owns and operates two processing plants – one in Suria and one in Sallent. The processing at these plants includes crushing, grinding, desliming, froth flotation, drying and drying.compacting. In addition, in Suria plant there is a process for crystallization of vacuum salt and pure potash. All of the power utilized by our Spanish mining operations is purchased from third-partythird‑party electric companies.


ICL owns all the land on which the Spanish surface facilities are located. The Spanish government owns all the underground mining rights and has granted ICL concessions to conduct mining operations under the land. See “Item 4 - Information on the Company— D. Property, Plant and Equipment— Concessions and Mining Rights”.
In 2011, ICL’s Board of Directors approved the restructuring of ICL Iberia’s operations from two sites to one site. According to this plan, production at the Suria site (Cabanasses mine) will be expanded gradually, whereas the mining and production activities at the Sallent site (Vilafruns mine) will be discontinued. Sallent site is expected to be closed at the end of 2020.
The production of potash in Spain is expected to be about 1 million tonnes per year and to reach a level of up to about 1.3 million tonnes per year after completion of the necessary adjustments.
112

The following table sets forth, the quantities and grades of the potash ore extracted from the mines and processed in the plants in Spain, for the three years ended December 31, 2016, 20152018, 2017 and 2014:

 Year Ended December 31,
 201620152014
Sallent   
Ore processed (in millions of metric tons) 2 22
Grade (% KCl)23%23%23%
Suria   
Ore processed (in millions of metric tons) 2 22
Grade (% KCl)26%26%25%
Total   
Ore processed (in millions of metric tons)444
    

2016:

 Year Ended December 31,
 201820172016

Sallent   
Ore processed (in millions of metric tonnes) 2 2 2
Grade (% KCl)23%23%23%
Suria   
Ore processed (in millions of metric tonnes) 2 2 2
Grade (% KCl)25%24%26%
Total   
Ore processed (in millions of metric tonnes) 4 4 4

United Kingdom

ICL’s mining operations in the United Kingdom are conducted by its wholly owned subsidiary, ICL UK.Boulby. ICL’s mine and processing plant are located approximately 340 kilometers north of London and approximately 40 kilometers east of Middlesbrough, England in the North York Moors National Park. The mine was originally designed, developed and operated by Imperial Chemical Industries and Charter Consolidated and the first potash was extracted in 1973. ICL purchased the mine, including mining leases and mineral extraction licenses, in 2002 from the then-owner,then‑owner, Anglo American Corporation.

ICL’s mining operations in the United Kingdom are conducted both under land and under the North Sea. Mining operations are conducted at depths up to much as 1,300 meters below ground onshore and 8501,000 meters below the surface of the North Sea. The operations under the North Sea are currently conducted as far as 14.517.5 kilometers offshore. Although ICL owns the land on which the minehead and the related surface operations are conducted, substantially all of the United Kingdom subsurface operations are conducted either under land that it does not own or under the North Sea, which it also does not own. ICL has the right to conduct our mining operations pursuant to the mining leases and mineral extraction licenses described below. SeeSee “Item 4 - Information on the Company—D. Property, PlantsPlant and Equipment—Concessions and Mining Rights” below. Extraction of potash from underground mines in the United Kingdom is carried out by mining sylvinite (a mixture of potash and salt found in varying potash concentrations). The potash is separated from the salt and from insoluble materials in processing plants located near the mines.

ICL’s United Kingdom mining operations are situated close to the western limits of polyhalite, potash and salt deposition in the Zechstein Basin extending inland in the United Kingdom and below the North Sea into Germany. The potashpolyhalite seam is of the Permian Evaporite Series and is overlain by some 800 meters to 1,300 meters of younger sedimentary rocks. The potashpolyhalite seam averages 74 meters in mineable thickness but varies from zero to more than 2011 meters in thickness. An approximately 11-meter-thick polysulphate layer exists approximately 150 meters below the potash deposits. ICL UK has evaluated the potential of this polysulphate as a separate resource, and also completed anThe access decline into the polysulphatepolyhalite bed was built in 2010 from one of theirits main salt roadways.


ICL’s United Kingdom mine As described below, Polysulphate™ production at ICL has been extensively explored using a combinationincreased in recent years and is now the focus of surface (sparse) and underground drilling. mining activities at ICL Boulby as it transitioned away from potash production due to fully depleted reserves.

113

The underground long hole (horizontal) drilling and 3-D seismic (offshore) surveys are used to delinate areas of minerals well in advance of mining. TheBoulby mine is accessed by two vertical shafts. One shaft hoists potashPolysulphate™ and salt and the other provides man-riding and service access. Mining currently takes place in two discrete areas. Mining is by continuous mining with shuttle cars and by a modified room and pillar method. The mine has been designated as a “gassy” mine, containing methane gas. Supply of the electricity to the Company's mining operations in the United KingdomBoulby mine is powered primarily bymainly through electricity purchased byfrom the local electricity company. There is also a power plant on the site that converts gas into electricity and supplements the electricity supply required for execution of the mining operations.

ICL’s raw material processing operations include crushing, desliming, grinding, froth flotation, formulation and drying. The plant was built in 1971 and is properly maintained on an ongoing basis in order to preserve the existing production capacity.

The following table sets forth, the quantities and grades of the potash ore extracted from the mine in the United Kingdom and the insoluble clay minerals, for the three years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014.

 Year Ended December 31,
 201620152014
Potash Ore (millions of metric tons) 2 33
Grade (% KCl)36%33%32%
Grade (% insoluble)11%13%15%
    

During 2016, the Company has decided to accelerate the transition from extracting and producing potash to producing polysulphate at its ICL UK mine. ICL will act to expand the polysulphate market by means of, among other things, development of a wide range of innovative polysulphate products. During the accelerated production period of polysulphate, mining of the economically viable potash reserves will continue until they are fully depleted, albeit at a slower rate than in 2015 and 2016. In 2017, the Company is planning to produce about 450 thousand tonnes of polysulphate and to increase the production up to about 1 million tonnes in 2019.

A new processing plant for PolySulphatePolysulphate™ was established in 2016.  This plant uses simple crushing and screening processes to produce standard and granular products in approximately 50:50 ratio. Research is currently underway regarding methods to further enhance these products through compaction, granulation, blending and micronutrient addition which, in combination, is anticipated to deliver high value new fertilizer products into the market.


China

In October 2015,addition, the former potash processing plant in the second quarter of 2018 was modified and sections of the drying and compacting circuit were adjusted for the production of PotashpluS, a compacted blend of Potash Standard (SMOP) and Poly Standard.

The following table sets forth, the quantities and grades of the potash ore extracted from the Boulby mine and the insoluble clay minerals, for the three years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016:
 Year Ended December 31,
 2018*20172016
Potash Ore (millions of metric tonnes) 1 1 2
Grade (% KCl) 35% 36% 36%
Grade (% insoluble) 9% 11% 11%

*Potash was extracted until the end of the second quarter of 2018.
The Company ceased the production of potash at its ICL Boulby mine at the end of the second quarter of 2018, due to fully depleted reserves and shifted to sole production of Polysulphate™.
The following table sets forth, the quantities of the polyhalite ore extracted from the mine in the United Kingdom, for the three years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016:
 Year Ended December 31,
 201820172016
Polyhalite Ore (millions of metric tonnes)0.40.50.2

Beginning in 2016, the Company completed establishmentaccelerated the transition from extracting and producing potash to producing Polysulphate™ at its ICL Boulby mine. ICL is acting to expand the Polysulphate™ market by means of, among other things, development of a 50/50wide range of innovative Polysulphate™-based products. In 2018, ICL produced about 350 thousand tonnes of Polysulphate™.
114

China
YPH JV, a joint venture (“YPH JV”) with Yunnan Phosphate Chemicals Group Corporation Ltd. (“YTH”), which is controlled by ICL and consolidated in its financial statements.

YPH JV operates an open-pit mining site named Haikou (the "Haikou Mine"mine") that is located alongside the Haikou Town, in the Xishan district, proximate to the city of Kunming. YPH JV holds a concession for the Haikou Minemine that expires in 2043 and also holds aan additional concession for mining phosphates throughended at November 2018 in an additionalthe mine namedof Baitacun (the "Baitacun Mine"mine"), which is located several kilometers from the Haikou Mine,mine, wherein the mining activities have not yet commenced. YPH JV expects to request renewalAs at the date of the Baitacunreport, the Company is examining the option to renew Baitacun's concession, priorsubject to its expiration. As of the date hereof,phosphate reserves soil survey results, as well as achieving the required understanding with the authorities.

The access to these minesHaikou mine is by means of a network of roads, as well as an accessible rail network that links to the state rail lines. FromIn light of the current operations at the Haikou Mine,mine, the production capabilitycapacity of YPH JV is approximately 2.5 million tonnes per year.

The Haikou Minemine has been in operation since 1966 and the concession area is spread over 9.6 square kilometers; and the Baitacun Mine area is spread over 3.08 square kilometers with no mining operations to date.

kilometers.

The Haikou Minemine is splitdivided into 4four areas. The phosphate sources in areas 1 and 2 have been almost fully depleted. The mining in area 3 began in 2015 and the mining activities in area 4 are scheduled to start in 2018.

started at the end of 2017.

The phosphate deposits at both mines are part of an extensive marine sedimentary basin and arein which the phosphate is situated in two layers – an upper layer and a lower layer. The thickness of the upper layer varies from 2.5 to 11 meters and is about 7.6 meters on average, whilewhereas the thickness of the lower layer varies from 2 to 9 meters and is about 6.1 meters on average. The mining is executed based on layers in accordance with theand quality thereof. Each layer has 3 quality categories: Grade I (highest gradegrade) > 30% P2O5)P2O5, Grade II (24-30% P2O5)II- 24-30% P2O5 and Grade III (15-24% P2O5)III- 15-24% P2O5. TheStructurally, the Haikou Minemine is structurally moderately complex, which requires precision mining that is accomplished through use of relatively small mining tools. The phosphate is covered by hard rock layers that require blasting, except for the upper ground level, which is removed and used for reclamation of the mined areas. The phosphate layers are also partially hard and require blasting.

The phosphate is low organic type, and as such it is suitable for phosphoric acid production.

The mining in the Haikou Mine is via open mining using conventional methods by means of drilling and blasting, hydraulic excavators, mining trucks and tractors for mining phosphates.

In the first stage: mining of the upper ground level is being stripped, and stored or spread out over mined areas for purposes of reclamation. In the second stage: drilling, blasting and stripping of the upper overburden level.level is executed. In the third stage: mining of the phosphate is performed by drilling and blasting of every layer separately (between which an interburden layer exists having a thickness of 11 meters, which is also drilled, blasted and stripped) and the phosphate is then loaded on truck and being transported to the beneficiation plants.


Based on the patches appearance of the medium and high gradehigh-grade phosphate, the mining is performed through use of small mining tools, trucks with a capacity of 40 tonnes and excavators havehaving a bucket capacity of 3 to 6 cubic meters.

115

Close to the Haikou Minemine, there are 2two beneficiation plants: flotation and scrubbing. These facilities are accessible by roads, and for the scrubbing plant alsois accessible by roads and train. The output of these facilities is designated for the phosphoric acid production plants of Yunnan Three Circles Chemical Co. Ltd. ("3C"), a fully owned subsidiary of YPH JV. 3C has a production site for acids and fertilizers, located several kilometers from the Haikou mine, which includes five sulfuricinclude four sulphuric acid factories, three green phosphoric acid factories, one factory for manufacture of technical grade white phosphoric acid and six fertilizer factories. These factories are powered by a heat power generator, having a capacity of 9MW, which is located onelectricity generated from the site. The power is a by-product of the phosphoricsulphuric acid production process.process as well as from the national power network. These facilities have been continuously developed and maintained for the last 40 years and are in a good condition (total net book value ofcondition. The access to the YPH JV (100%) as at December 31, 2016 is about $160 million). Theproduction site is located several kilometers from the Haikou Mine. Access to the site isalso by road and train.

Mining activities have not yet commenced on the Baitacun Mine, as development at the Baitacun Mine by YPH JV is still in the exploratory stages. The initial geological survey was conducted by the Chinese government and the area is ready for planning of the mining operations. However, since the ratio of the overburden material to the phosphates in this area is high, the mining operations, to the extent they are ultimately commenced, will be postponed to later stages, if any.

Because it is not currently planned to commence mining operations at Baitacun in the near future, we have not yet completed a study to determine if it has SEC Guide 7 compliant reserves.

The following table sets forth for the periods indicated the amount of our total mine production of raw ore in the Haikou Minemine (and the relevant grade) supplied to our beneficiation plants:

 Year Ended December 31,
 20162015*
Millions of metric tons produced 2.20.6
Grade (% P2O5 before/after beneficiation)20.4/29.222.1/28.3
   

* Informationplants, for Q4 2015 only – commencing from the date ICL acquired the Haikou mine.

three years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016:

 Year Ended December 31,
 201820172016 
Millions of metric tonnes produced 2.15 1.95 2.20
Grade (% P2O5 before/after beneficiation)
20.7/28.9821.3/29.620.4/29.2

The following table sets forth (for the two years ended December 31, 2016, 2015,) the approximate amounts of product produced after processing by our operations in Haikou:

 Year Ended December 31,
 20162015*
 thousands of metric tonnesthousands of metric tonnes
Phosphate Rock 1,798569
Green Phosphoric Acid 617159
Fertilizers 790149
White Phosphoric Acid (TG) 37-
   

*InformationHaikou mine, for Q4 2015 only – commencing from the date ICL acquired the Haikou mine.

three years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016:

 Year Ended December 31,
 201820172016
 thousands of metric tonnesthousands of metric tonnesthousands of metric tonnes
Phosphate Rock 1,725 1,545 1,798
Green Phosphoric Acid 635 572 617
Fertilizers 621 335 790
White Phosphoric Acid (TG) 65 61 37


116

Concessions and Mining Rights

Israel

ICL Dead Sea Ltd. Concession.

Concession

Pursuant to the Israeli Dead Sea Concession Law, 1961 (hereinafter – “thethe Concession Law”)Law), as amended in 1986, and the concession indenturedeed attached as an addendum to the Concession Law, DSW was granted a concession to utilize the resources of the Dead Sea and to lease the land required for its plants in Sodom for a period that is expected to end on March 31, 2030, accompanied by a priority right to receive the concession after its expiration, should the Government wish to offer a new concession to a third party.

In 2015, the Minister of Finance appointed a team for determination ofto determine the “governmental activities to be conducted towards the end of the concession period”. The public’s comments in this matter were submitted to the team. Based on the interim report and its recommendations published in May 2018, and following a public hearing, on January 21, 2019, the Israeli Ministry of Finance released the final report of the inter-ministry team headed by Mr. Yoel Naveh, former Chief Economist, which includes a series of guidelines and recommendations regarding its positions and viewpoints in connection withthe actions that the government should take towards the end of the concession were submitted to the team. The team was asked to submit its recommendations to the Minister of Finance by May 2016, however to the best of the Company’s knowledge up toperiod. As at the date of the report, since the team had not yet submitted its recommendations. Therereport includes guiding principles and a recommendation to establish sub-teams to implement such principles, the Company is unable to assess, at this stage, the concrete implications, manner in which the recommendations would be implemented in practice and on which schedules. In addition, there is no certainty as to whathow the recommendations of this committee will be with regard toGovernment would interpret the procedures that the government will undertake in connection with the existing concessionConcession Law and as to the manner in which future mining rightsthis process and methodology would ultimately be implemented.
The Financial Statements were prepared under the assumption that DSW will be granted.

continue to operate the relevant assets for at least their remaining useful lives. In addition, the Financial Statements were prepared under the assumption that it is more likely than not that ICL will not sell DSW.

In addition, in 2015, the Minister of Finance appointed a team headed by the (former) Accountant General designated to establishevaluate the manner in which, according to the current concession, the replacement value of DSW’s tangible assets willwould be calculated in the event suchassuming that these assets arewould be returned to the government at the end of the concession period. The determination date of the actual calculation will be executedis only in 2030. As far as the Company is aware, this work has not yet been completed.
In December 2018, the Company received an opinion from an independent appraiser regarding the fair value of the property, plant and equipment of the subsidiaries Dead Sea Works, Dead Sea Bromine and Dead Sea Magnesium in Israel (hereinafter – the Subsidiaries). The teamOpinion was requested to submit its recommendationsprepared mainly for the Subsidiaries’ financial statements for 2016 and onward, which serve as a basis for the reports filed pursuant to the Minister of Finance by March 2015. In January 2017, the Accountant General sent a letter to the Chief Economist – the Supervisorprovisions of the State’s revenues wherein she noted that recently the positionTaxation of the Division of the Accountant GeneralNatural Resources Law. The Property, Plant and Equipment value provided in the Ministry of Finance regardingopinion is based on the arrangement coveringReplacement Cost methodology and is estimated at about $6 billion, as at December 31, 2015, and at December 31, 2016.
Though the assets was finalized (but was not published), however in lightassessed for tax purposes and the expected changeover ofassets that may be valuated under the Accountant General, the draft position report is being transferred to the incoming Accountant General for completion of the work. At this stage,Concession Law are highly correlated, there is no certainty regardingcomplete identity between them. The Company believes that the recommendations ofapplied Replacement Cost Methodology used in the new Accountant General. In addition, there is no certainty as to howopinion for estimating the Government will interpretfair value coincides with the methodology mentioned in the Concession Law for future valuation of the Property, Plant and Equipment upon termination of the concession period. Nevertheless, there could be other interpretations to the manner of implementation of the Concession Law’s provisions with respect to the valuation methodology, hence, the estimated value with respect to the Concession Law could materially differ from the value provided in which this processthe said opinion, even with respect to the same assets and methodology will ultimately be implemented, and howdates. It is expected that the value of the tangibleProperty, Plant and Equipment, at the end of the concession period, will change as time passes and as a result of purchase and disposal of assets will be calculated.

included in the future valuation.

117

In consideration of the concession, DSW pays royalties to the Government of Israel, calculated at the rate of about 5% of the value of the products at the factory gate, less certain expenses, where accordingexpenses. According to the salt harvesting agreement, which wasSalt Harvesting Agreement signed in July 2012 (hereinafter – the royalties rate SLA), in respect ofcase the annual quantity of chloride potash sold is in excess of 1.5 million tons istonnes, the royalties rate would be 10% (in place of 5%). In addition, according to the salt harvesting agreement,SLA states that if legislation is enacted that changes the specific fiscal policy in connection with profits or royalties deriving from the mining of quarries from the Dead Sea, the Company’s consent will not apply regardingto the increase inof the royalties’royalties' rate on the surplus quantities referred to above commencing fromwill not apply, after the date onenactment of the legislation, to the period in which such additional tax is collected as stated in the said legislation.
In November 2015,January 2016, the Economic Efficiency Law was published,for Taxation of Profits from Natural Resources, including implementation of the Sheshinski Committee’s recommendations, which address royalties and taxation of excess profits from Dead Sea minerals. The lawminerals (hereinafter – the Law), entered into effect on January 1, 2016.

effect. Accordingly, the rate of the royalties' provision was updated to 5%. The Company's position, pursuant to the SLA and its arguments in the royalties' arbitration, is that increasing royalties at a rate exceeding 5% requires the Company's consent, which expired with the enactment of the Law. The State holds a different position regarding the royalties' rate in 2016. Nevertheless, in the Company's estimation, in the event this matter would be challenged in arbitration, it is more likely than not that its claims regarding the royalties' rate increase, following the enactment of the Law in 2016, will be accepted.

DSW granted a sub-concessionsub‑concession to Dead Sea Bromine Ltd. (hereinafter – “the–the Bromine Company”)Company) to produce bromine and its compounds from the Dead Sea, the expiration date of which is concurrent with the DSW's concession. The royalties in respect of the products manufactured by the Bromine Company are received by DSW from the Bromine Company, and DSW then pays them over to the State.

In addition, there

There is an arrangement relating to payment of royalties by Dead Sea Magnesium (hereinafter – “DSM”)DSM) for the production of metal magnesium by virtue of a specific arrangement with the State provided in the Government’s decision dated September 5, 1993. Pursuant to thethis arrangement, royalties are paid by DSM on the basis of carnallite used for production of magnesium. The arrangement with DSM provides that during 2006 the State may demand a reconsideration in connection with the amount of the royalties and the method orof their calculation for 2007 and thereafter. The State’s demand for reconsideration, as stated, was firstinitially received at the end of 2010, and the matter is presently in an arbitration proceeding.

proceeding, as described below.

In 2007, a letter was received from the previousformer Accountant General of the Israeli Ministry of Finance, claiming an underpayment of royalties amounting to hundreds of millions of shekels. Pursuant to the concession, disputes between the parties, relating to the concession, including royalties, are to be decided by an arbitration panel of three arbitrators, (each side appoints an arbitrator and thesecomprising of two arbitrators appointed by each party, who in turn jointly appoint the third).

a third arbitrator. For additional details regarding the arbitration proceeding and the provision recorded by the Company in 2015 and 2016 stemming from the partial arbitration decision – see “Item 8. Financial Information—A. Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information—Legal Proceedings” and Note 20 to our audited financial statements.

Audited Financial Statements.

In 2018, 2017 and 2016, 2015 and 2014, ICL Dead SeaDSW paid current royalties to the Government of Israel in the amounts of $53$66 million, $97$60 million, and $84$53 million, respectively. In addition, in 2015,2018, the Company paid an amount of $152$62 million, in respect of royalties relating to prior periods.

In addition, ICL Dead Sea pays the Israel LandsLand Authority lease rentals in respect of the leases as defined in the concession certificate. The amount of the payment and the related update mechanism is provided in the agreement signed with the Israel LandsLand Authority (formerly the Israel LandsLand Administration) in 1975.

The amount is updated from time to time.

118

Rotem Concession.

Rotem has been mining phosphates in the Negev in Israel for more than sixty years. The mining is conducted in accordance with the phosphate mining concessions, which are granted from time to time by the Minister of National Infrastructures, Energy and Water under the Mines Ordinance, throughby the Supervisor of Mines in his Office, (hereinafter – ‘‘as well as the Supervisor’’), accompanied by mining authorizations issued by the Israel Lands Authority (hereinafter – ‘‘Authority. The concessions relate to quarries (phosphate rock) whereas the Authority’).

ICL Rotem has the following twoauthorizations cover use of land as active mining concessions, which cover a total area of approximately 55,327 acres:

1.Rotem Field (including the Hatrurim field) — valid up to the end of 2021;

2.Zafir Field — (Oron-Zin) — valid up to the end of 2021;

areas.

The Oron concession was first granted in 1952. The Zin concession was first granted in 1970 as part of the Oron concession and the joint concession was subsequently renamed Zafir. The Zafir concession (consisting of both the Oron and Zin sites) was renewed every 3 years, and in 1995 it was granted for 10 years and thereafter in 2002 it was granted up to 2021. The Rotem concession was first granted in 1970 and, similar to the Zafir concession it was granted in 1995 for 10 years and in 2002 it was granted up to 2021. In 2011, the Supervisor of Mines expanded the area of the Rotem concession by joining the Hatrurim site to the area of this concession, and the matter was transferred to Israel Lands Authority for handling of expansion of the permissible mining area to the Rotem field, in accordance with expansion of the concession area.

There is no express tender process under the Mines Ordinance for every reserve certificate, and up to now no phosphate mining rights have been offered in a competitive process, however, a legislative change from the end of 2015 regarding royalties mentions the possibility of offering mining rights in a competitive process. Given the high cost of constructing the Company’s downstream processing and production facilities (which any other bidder would need to construct near the fields), the Company has not faced competition for these concessions in the past.

The concessions relate to the quarry (phosphate rock) whereas the other authorizations relate to use of land as active mine sites.

ICL Rotem has the following two mining concessions, which cover a total area of approximately 224 square kilometers:
1.   Rotem Field (including the Hatrurim Field) – valid up to the end of 2021;
2.   Zafir Field (Oron‑Zin) – valid up to the end of 2021;
As at the date of this report, the company is working to extend the said concessions with the relevant authorities.
119

Mining royalties

Royalties

As part of the terms of the concessions in respect of mining of the phosphate, Rotem is required to pay the State of Israel royalties based on a calculation formatas stipulated in the Israeli Mines Ordinance. In January 2016, a legislative amendment entered into effect covering implementation of the recommendations of the Sheshinski Committee that changed the formatformula for the calculation of the royalties, increasedby increasing the rates from 2% to 5% of the value of the quarried material and left the Supervisor of Mines the possibility of collecting royalties at a higher rate if he decidesdecided to grant a mining right in a competitive process wherein one of the selection indices is the royalty rate.

In 2018, 2017 and 2016, Rotem paid royalties to the State of Israel in the amounts of $5 million, $4 million, and $5 million, respectively.
Planning and building

Building

The mining and quarrying activities require a zoning approval of the site based on a plan in accordance with the Israeli Planning and Building Law, 1965. These plans are updated, as needed, from time to time. As at the date of thethis report, there are various requests at different stages of deliberations pending before the planning authorities.


In November 2016, the District Board for the Southern District approved a detailed site plan for mining phosphate in the Zin-OronZin‑Oron area. This plan, which covers an area of about 350 square kilometers, will permit the continued mining of phosphate located in the Zin valley and in the Oron valley for a period of 25 years or up to exhaustion of the raw material – whichever occurs first, with the possibility for extension (under the authority of the District Planning Board).

The Company is working to promote the plan for mining phosphates in Barir field (which is located in the southsouthern part of South Zohar field) in the Negev Desert. In December 2015, the National Planning and Building Council (hereinafter – the National Council) approved the Policy Document regarding Mining and Quarrying of Industrial Minerals, (hereinafter – “the Policy Document”), which includes, among other things,included a recommendation to permit phosphate mining in the Barir field. The Policy Document that was approved will serve as the basis for preparation of a national outline plan (hereinafter – “the National Outline Plan”) for mining and quarrying, which is also to be submitted for approval by the National Planning and Building Council. Along with the approval of the Policy Document, the National Planning and Building Council instructed the Planning Administration to raise the matter of the directive to prepare a detailed plan for the Barir Field at one of its upcoming meetings.

In the beginning of 2016, the National Outline Plan (NOP 14B), which includes the South Zohar was submitted, for comments by the various committees, which provided their comments and recommendations toward the end of 2016. On February 14, 2017, a hearing was held by the Committee for Principle Planning Matters, whereat decisions were made with respectdecided to the continuedcontinue advancement of the mining in the South Zohar field. Concurrently, and based on a decision of the National Planning and Building Board,Council, instructions were prepared by the competent authorities with respect to the performance of an environmental survey of the Barir field for purposes of its further advancement. TheIn April 2017, the National Council recommended to the government to approve National Outline Plan (hereinafter – NOP 14B), which includes South Zohar field, and determined that Barir field will be advanced as part of a detailed National Outline Plan, which was approved by the government’s Housing Cabinet in January 2018.

In January 2018, the Minister of Health filed an appeal of the said instructions are expectedapproval, requiring compliance with the Ministry of Health’s recommendation to be broughtconduct a survey regarding the health impact in each site included in NOP 14B. As part of a discussion regarding the appeal, which was held in the Housing Cabinet, it was decided, with the consent of the Ministries of Health, Finance and Energy, to remove the appeal and to approve the NOP 14B. In addition, it was decided to establish a team with representatives of the ministries of Treasury, Health, Transportation, Environmental Protection and Energy, which will present to the Housing Cabinet a report that includes health aspects for approvalNOP 14B. In April 2018, the NOP 14B was formally published.
120

In July 2018, a petition was submitted to the Israeli Supreme Court of Justice by the municipality of Arad against the National Planning and Building Board during 2017.

Council, the Ministry of Health, the Ministry of Environmental Protection and Rotem, to revoke the approval of NOP 14B. In February 2016, the municipality of Arad, together with several other plaintiffs, includingJanuary 2019, residents of the town Arad, andBedouin diaspora in the communities and Bedouin villages surrounding the area, filed"Arad Valley" submitted a petition with the Israeli Supreme Court sitting asto the High Court of Justice (hereinafter – the Court) against approvalthe National Council, the Government of Israel and Rotem, in which the Court was requested to cancel the provisions of NOP 14B and the decision of the Policy Document that authorizedNational Council from December 5, 2017, regarding to the advancement of a detailed plan for phosphate mining in the South Zohar field duefield. In addition, the Court was requested to among other things,issue an interim injunction preventing the implementation of the NOP 14B instructions and the National Council's said decision until a fearfinal resolution. On January 22, 2019, the Supreme Court consolidated the hearing of potential environmental and health dangers they contend will occur. Rotem was joined as a respondent to the petition. In February 2017, the Company submitted a statement of defense. The Company estimates that the chances that the petition will be accepted are low. The Company believestogether with the other petition filed against NOP 14B and decided that the mining activities in South Zohar do not involve any risks to the environment or to people. There is no certainty that the National Outline Plan and the South Zohar plan will be approved at all, in light of, among other things, the opposing position of the Health Ministry. Moreover,this stage there is no certainty regardingbasis for granting the timelines forinterim injunction. On February 5, 2019, the submission of the Plans, the approval thereof, or of further developments with respect to the South Zohar. If mining approval is not received for South Zohar, there will be a significant impact on the Group’s future mining reserves in the medium and long term. The hearing in the High Court of Justice is scheduled to take place on March 20, 2017.

In 2016, 2015 and 2014, Rotem paid royalties to the State of Israel in the amounts of $5 million, $4 million and $3 million, respectively.

Company filed its response.

Under the terms of the concessions and in order to continue to hold the concession rights, ICL Rotem is required to comply with additional reporting requirements, in addition to the payment of royalties.

Spain

The Spanish government owns all

A subsidiary in Spain (hereinafter – ICL Iberia) was granted mining rights based on legislation of Spain’s Government from 1973 and the regulations accompanying this legislation. Further to the legislation, as stated, the Government of the undergroundCatalonia region published special mining rights and has granted the Company concessions to conduct mining operations under its land pursuant to mining legislation enacted in 1973 and related regulations. The mining permits (or concessions) in Spain are administrated by the regional governments (in Catalonia, the Generalitat), except those specially reserved areas that are still administered by the Spanish central government. There are several such areas in Spain, including Reserva Catalana.regulations whereby ICL Iberia (IBP) owns 126 mining concessions. Two separate and independent processes of paying fees and renewals are thus involved.

Originally, the concessions were divided among several mining companies in the area. However, as companies were acquired or relinquished their concessions, ICL Iberia (IBP) obtained these concessions. As a result, ICL Iberia (IBP) now holds mining concessionsreceived individual licenses for each of the 126 different sites that are relevant sites forto the Company’s current and potentialpossible future mining activities. As partSome of the renewal process,licenses are valid up to 2037 and the rest are effective up to 2067. The concession for the "Reserva Catalana", an additional site wherein mining has not yet been commenced, expired in 2012. The Company must prepare and presentis acting in cooperation with the Spanish Government to obtain a basic technical report describing the intended userenewal of the mines. concession. According to the Spanish authorities, the concession period is valid until a final decision is made regarding the renewal.

The concessions cover a total area of 42,489 hectares in the province of Barcelona and 26,809 hectares in the province of Lerida. The mining royalties in 2015 amounted to approximately €170 thousand.

Regarding "Reserva Catalana", an additional site wherein mining has not yet been commenced, it was clarified that in 2007As part of a renewal process, was commenced for extensionthe Company must prepare and present a basic technical report describing the intended use of the concession period, which ended in 2012, for an additional 30 years. In light of the changeover of the governments in Spain, the administrative processes of the National Mining Authority with respect to extending the concession period have not yet been completed.mines. As at the date of this Annual Report, ICL Iberia is in the process of renewing the rights. According to the Spanish authorities, the concession period is valid until a final decision is made regarding renewal of the concession period.

ICL Iberia (IBP) applies well in advance for concessions for the mining areas. As at the date of this Annual Report, ICL Iberia (IBP) has not had any serious difficulties in renewing those leases in the past. The earliest renewal required for any of the 126 existing relevant concessions will be in 2037, and most of the concessions are effective up to 2067. The length of the planned life of the Cabanasas mine, given the first stage and the second stage of the expansion plan, is 23 years. As is required by law, the concessions must be renewed prior to the expiration date. If a concession were to expire for some reason,expires, a bidding process would start.

will be initiated. ICL Iberia (IBP) applies in advance for the renewal of mining concessions and until now, had no difficulties in renewing them.

121

United Kingdom

United Kingdom Mining Concession.

– ICL Boulby

The mining rights of a subsidiary in the United Kingdom (hereinafter – ICL UK)Boulby), are based on approximately 114 mining leases and licenses for extracting various minerals, in addition to numerous easements and rights of way from private owners of land under which ICL UKBoulby operates, and mining rights inunder the North Sea granted by the British Crown (Crown Estates)., which includes provisions to explore and exploit the resources of the Polysulphate mineral. The said mining rights cover a total area of about 374 square kilometers. As at the date of thethis report, all the lease periods, licenses, easements and rights of way are effective – some ofuntil 2038. In 2018 and 2017, the said periods will continue upmining royalties amounted to 2020 whereas some will continue up to 2038.

All of ICL UK's older lease agreements (about 74 agreements) were signed for a period of 50 years in the 1970s, so most of these run until the early to mid-2020s, except for the leases with the Crown Commissioners (Crown Estates) for the offshore rights in the North Sea, which were recently renewed$1.3 million and expire in 2035. The lease with the Crown Commissioners includes provisions to explore and exploit the polysulphate mineral. The recently acquired leases (about 40 agreements) were obtained in the late 1990s and early 2000s, and they all have a 35-year lease period with a 35-year option to extend the lease. For purposes of signing the lease agreements, ICL UK used local solicitors and contacted the individual landowners. Renewal of the onshore lease currently covering about 18% of reserves area at our mine in the United Kingdom was extended to the end of 2020 (one large lease is involved). $2 million, respectively.

Historically, the renewal of leases has not been problematic, and we believe that we have orthe Company is confident in the renewal of all land leases as required and will receive all government approvals and permits necessary for our reserves in the United Kingdom. In the Company’s estimation, there is no competition forexploiting all targeted mineral leases because ICL UK has already secured the planning permission (“Planning Permission”) for potash and rock-salt extraction in the area and has all the necessary government approvals and permits for mineral extraction. Planning permission, which is granted by local authorities in the United Kingdom, is the permission required in order to be allowed to build on land or change the use of land or buildings. resources.
The current licenseplanning permit, relevant to mineral exploitation, processing and land usage, is valid up to 2023, and accordingly2023. Accordingly, a new agreementpermission must be signed withissued by the North York Moors National Park onAuthority no later than 2020. ICL UKBoulby is taking action to extend the planning permit by fortytwenty‑five years.
ICL Boulby has a preferential right to renew some of its leases as it has the Planning Permission to extract minerals. In addition, in the past, when leases expired, there has been no interest from other companies and there is no competitive bidding. ICL UK has a preferential right to renew the leases as it has the Planning Permission to extract potash-bearing minerals. bidding process.
The entities involved in renewing or obtaining new leases are ICL UK,Boulby, local solicitors and individual landowners who own the mineral rights, as described above. The particular conditions that must be met in order to retain the leases are payment of annual fees and a royalty payment for minerals extracted from the property to the landowner.

Several small areas remain with no mining lease as these are areas where either the mineral owners have refused to grant a lease or mineral ownership is in many small patches having a number of different owners. However, none of these has a significant impact on exploration or development and at the date of the report, there are no plans to pursue them in the future.

ICL UK currently has long-term mineral lease agreements covering more than 70% of the area. Based on past experience, the Company is confident that it will be able to obtain the remainder of the resource and reserve leases, if necessary. In addition, based on past experience, no competition is anticipated in obtaining mineral lease agreements for potash mineral leases and our few failures to obtain leases in the past have been limited to very small leases that can easily be circumvented during mining. The small area of leases that ICL UK does not have involve situations where the individual landowners have refused to sign mineral leases and no other party has been granted a lease.


United Kingdom Concession.Concession - Everris
A UK subsidiary from ICL Specialty FertilizersInnovative Ag Solutions segment (hereinafter – Everris UK), has peat mines in the UK (Creca, Nutberry and Douglas Water). Peat is used as a raw material for production of detached beds for soil improvement and use as soil substitutes in growing media. The Nutberry and Douglas Water mining sites are owned by Everris UK, while the Creca mine is held under a long-termlong‑term lease. The mining permits are granted by the local authorities and are renewed after examination of the local authorities. The mining permits were granted up to the end of 2024.

China

YPH JV holds two phosphate mining licenses that were issued in July 2015, by the Division of Land and Resources of the Yunnan district in China. With reference to the Haikou Mine (hereinafter – Haikou), the mining license is valid up to January 2043, whereas regarding the Baitacun Mine (hereinafter – Baitacun), the mining license is valid up toexpired in November 2018. YPH JV is expected to request a renewal ofThe mining activities at Haikou are carried out in accordance with the above‑mentioned license. Regarding Baitacun, concession prior to its expiration date. Nevertheless, in the foreseeable future the Company does not planis examining the option to carry out a mining operation in Baitacun.

Acquisition of mining rights

Accordingrenew the concession, subject to the Mining Concession Grant Contract of Haikou, which was signed in November 2012 between YPC (the prior owners ofphosphate reserves soil survey results and achieving the rights in the mine), and the Land and Resources Department of Yunnan Province (together with its local equivalent – "the Resources Department"). The mining rights relating to Baitacun were also previously owned by YPC. However, YPC did not enter into a concession agreement covering these rights that were received prior to publication of the relevant PRC laws requiring the Resources Department to sign such an agreement. As part of formation of YPH JV, in October 2015, the mining rights related to Haikou and Baitacun were transferred to YPH JV.

Renewal of Mining License

In order to retain the Haikou and Baitacun mining licenses, YPH JV must complyrequired understanding with the provisions of the relevant Chinese laws and regulations regarding mining activities. In particular, YPH JV is required to conduct an annual examination with regard to its mining licenses. The items to be examined in the annual examination mainly include the following issues: whether the taxes, fees and premiums relating to the mining licenses and mining activities conducted by the company have been paid in full; whether the annual reserves report (as applicable) has been submitted; whether various mining parameters have met the standards required by law; whether land reclamation has been conducted; and whether any sanctions have been imposed on the company or there are violations of laws by the company. In addition, YPH JV has to submit the renewal application to the Resources Department 30 days prior to expiration of the applicable mining license.

The Resources Department will consider the following factors when reviewing a renewal application: (i) whether YPH JV needs to continue to develop in the area; (ii) whether there is a dispute over the relevant mining right; (iii) whether proper fees and taxes have been paid in full, and whether YPH JV has conducted mining in violation of the law; (iv) whether the original mining right is legally defective; and (v) other conditions as the authorities require.

.

To renew a mining license, among other application documents, it is important to provide two written documents for the Resources Department to approve the renewal application: (i) annual check report for the mining license; (ii) mineral resources reserves verification report or other reports of similar nature to indicate that there are still reserves in the mine.

122

Natural Resources Tax

Royalties

With respect to the mining rights, up to July 2016, YPH JV was required to payin accordance with the authorities a “Mineral Resources Compensation Fee” at the rate of 2% of YPH JV’s revenues from sales of phosphate rock mined. In addition, YPH JV was required to pay a “Resource Tax”, of 15 yuan per tonne of YPH JV’s phosphate rock mined from the mines. Commencing from July 2016, the new Natural"Natural Resources Tax Law (hereinafter – “the Law”) entered into effect, which includes phosphate rock. Pursuant to the Law, instead of 15 yuan as stated above,Law", YPH JV will pay taxroyalties of 8% ofon the selling price based on the market price of the rock prior to its processing. In addition, as part of the Law, the “Mineral Resources Compensation Fee” at the rate of 2% was cancelled, this being from the effective date of the Law.

In light of that stated above, in 2016,2018 and 2017, YPH JV paid $6 million.

royalties in the amount of $3 million and $2 million, respectively.

Grant of Mining Rights to Lindu

In February 2016, YPC issued a statement whereby in 2010 YPC entered into agreements with the local authority of Jinning County, Yunnan Province and Jinning Lindu Mining Development and Construction Co. Ltd. (“(hereinafter - Lindu Company”)Company), according to which Lindu Company is permitted to mine up to two million tonnes of phosphate rock from a certain area measuring 0.414 square kilometers within the area of the Haikou mine (hereinafter - “the– the Daqing Area”)Area) and to sell such phosphate rock to any third party in its own discretion.

Prior to the establishment of YPH JV, YPC proposed to the local authority of Jinning County and Lindu Company to swap the rights granted to Lindu Company in the Daqing Area with another area that is not a part of the Haikou mine, andwhere Lindu Company will mine in that area.would mine. In March 2016, in a meeting held between YPC, ICL and other relevant parties, YPC stated that it could not exchange its other mines to replace the Daqing Area since Lindu Company’s benefit is connected to the Daqing Area. Under the above above‑mentioned statement, YPC has undertaken that YPH JV’s mining right in the Haikou mine will not be adversely affected by the above-mentioned arrangements regarding Lindu Company’s mining rights within the Daqing Area. At YPH’s Board meeting held in November 2016, itarrangements. It was decided that YPH should conduct further communications with YPC and Lindu Company, for the purpose of protecting YPH’sits legal rights and to urge the parties to reach a fair, just, and reasonable solution to this issue, as soon as possible. In light of the above, ICL didn’t include this area as part of YPH reserves.


Reserves

The Company believes it has a broad and high-qualityhigh‑quality mineral reserves base due to its strategically-locatedstrategically‑located mines and facilities. “Reserves” are defined by SEC Industry Guide 7 as that part of a mineral deposit that could be economically and legally extracted or produced at the time of the reserves determination. Industry Guide 7 divides reserves between “proven (measured) reserves” and “probable (indicated) reserves,” which are defined as follows:

·
Proven (measured) reserves. Reserves for which (1) quantity is computed from information received from explorations, channels, wells and drillings; grade and/or quality are computed from the results of detailed sampling and (2) the sites for inspection, sampling and measurement are spaced so closely to each other so that the geologic character is well defined thatso the size, shape, depth and mineral content of reserves can be reliably determined.

·Probable (indicated) reserves. Reserves for which quantity and grade and/or quality are computed from information similar to that used for proven (measured) reserves, but the sites for survey, sampling, and measurement are further apart or are otherwise less efficiently spaced. The degree of assurance, although lower than that for proven (measured) reserves, is high enough to assume continuity between points of observation.

123

ICL categorizes its reserves in accordance with these SEC Industry Guide 7 definitions, as stated above. The quantity, nature of the mineral reserves and estimate of the reserves at each of the Company’s properties are estimated by its internal geologists and mining engineers.

In October 2018, the SEC adopted a final rule that will replace SEC Industry Guide 7 with new disclosure requirements that are more closely aligned with current industry and global regulatory practices and standards. We must comply with these new disclosure requirements beginning with our fiscal year ended December 31, 2021, although early voluntary compliance is permitted. As at the date of this report, we have not adopted these new disclosure requirements and have not determined when we will elect to adopt them. When we implement the new methodology in connection with adoption of these disclosure requirements, we will present resource and reserve estimates, and the information presented may differ materially from the reserve estimates to those presented historically and in this Annual Report under the existing SEC rules.
Israel

The following table sets forth information regarding our estimates of our phosphate reserves in Israel (all of which are wholly owned by us) as of December 31, 2016:

 CategoryWhite
Phosphate
Low
Organic
Phosphate
High
Organic
Phosphate
Bituminous
Phosphate
Recoverable
Reserves
Average
Grade
  (millions of
metric tonnes)
(millions of
metric tonnes)
(millions of
metric tonnes)
(millions of
metric tonnes)
(millions of
metric tonnes)
(% P2O5)
RotemProven- 13-- 1326%
ZinProven- 16 14 4 3425%
OronProven226--2824%
Total (Proven) 223414474 
        

2018:

CategoryWhite PhosphateLow Organic PhosphateHigh Organic PhosphateBituminous PhosphateRecoverable ReservesAverage Grade
(millions of metric tonnes)
(%P2O5)

RotemProven- 10-- 1026%
ZinProven- 16 15 3 3425%
OronProven 14 4-- 1823%
Total (Proven) (1)  14 30 15 3 62 

(1)          Amounts may not add up due to rounding.
The Company continues to check the adaptation of various potential types of phosphate rock (bituminous and brown phosphates) for the production of phosphoric acid and its downstream products as part of an effort to utilize and increase existing phosphate reserves. In 2019, the Company will further analyze these types of phosphate including R&D, pilots, plant testing activities and its economic feasibility. If this analysis is able to establish economic feasibility, we would expect to add a portion of this phosphate rock resources to our resource and reserve bases.
In determining these reserves, a cut-offcut‑off grade of 20% to 25% P2O5 was applied, depending on the processing characteristics of the phosphate rock and the existing processes. The cut-offcut‑off grade differs for each mine in accordance with the beneficiation process and enrichment capacity: a cut-offcut‑off grade of 20% P2O5 was applied at Oron, a cut-offcut‑off grade of 23% P2O5 was applied at Zin, and a cut-offcut‑off grade of 25% P2O5 was applied at Rotem. The cut-offcut‑off grade for Oron is lower because ICL Rotem has the appropriate beneficiation process for chalk phosphate rock with limestone, which characterizes the white phosphate and, therefore, the beneficiation process, through the flotation process, is extremely efficient. The cut-offcut‑off grade for the Rotem mine is higher because the beneficiation process there has a limited grinding and flotation system, and only medium to high grade phosphate can be fed (which is appropriate for the existing reserves at Rotem). The cut-offcut‑off grade for Zin is slightly higher than that of Oron because of the presence of marl and clay that reduces the efficiency of the enrichment process. For purposes of determining the cut-offcut‑off grade, utilization and quantities parameters account was taken of the geology factors (continuity, structure), mining method, mining dilution, plant utilization, technical feasibility, operating costs, and historical and current product prices. The parameters employed in the calculation are as follows: on-siteon‑site tonnes (multiplying area by layer thickness and phosphate density); recoverable tonnes (tonnes of mineral which can be mined, taking into account mining dilution); mineable tonnes (recoverable tonnes from which the tonnes produced are deducted); stripping ratio (the quantity of waste removed per tonne of phosphate rock mined); planned dilution; cost per tonne for mining (typically related to transport distance to beneficiation plant); cost per tonne including reclamation; and unplanned dilution (5% unplanned dilution is taken into account based on the data from the mining in and the data from the problematic areas). ICL Rotem’s yearly mining plan is not determined by the minimum cut-offcut‑off grade, and fluctuations in commodity prices rarely affect its cut-offcut‑off grade.


124

The cut-offcut‑off grade calculations come from historical yield data and ICL Rotem’s historical experience with mining, and are adequately calculated and modelled by its geologists, operation engineers and economists. The calculation takes the ore grade in-situ,in‑situ, converts it into extracted ore with ICL Rotem mining method and estimates the plant yield depending on the grade. Economic modelling then gives the cut-offcut‑off figures currently used by ICL Rotem.

The proven reserves above the cut-offcut‑off grade were obtained from the calculated on-siteon‑site resources taking into account the mining method, the rate of mining dilution, and in-plantin‑plant recovery, based on ICL Rotem’s historical data. In order to convert the resources into reserves, account is taken, separately, of the mining dilution rate, mining method and the geological conditions, including, historical yield data, and are based on the previous five years’ experience. The mining dilution rate in the Company's mines in Israel’s southern region is 2.5% and takes into account the continuity of the layers and the geological structure. The quantity and grade of the calculated reserves are those that are expected to be transferred to the processing plant and are subject to recovery indices in the utilization plant. The updated utilization in the plant varies between the sites as it consists of historical yield data, which is currently between45% for Oron, 46% (at Oronfor Rotem, and Rotem) and 48% (at Zin)40-46%  for Zin. These differences in metallurgical recovery rates are due to differences in the beneficiation process at the different mines. Proven reserves have been explored by borehole intersections typically at 50 to 70 meters intervals. Each of the three plants at the mines has been developed over the past few decades for the optimum upgrading of the phosphate rock to concentrate ore containing typically 31% to 32% P2O5. The conversion ratio for most of the phosphate layers is 1.8 tonnes for every 1 cubic meter, where a conversion ratio of 2.0 tonnes per cubic meter is used for hard, calcareous beds. These factors are used on the basis of long experience and are considered to be reasonable.

In calculating the cut-offcut‑off grade and reserves, an average of the previous three years’ market prices and operating costs was used as part of the calculations to ensure economic feasibility.

The three-yearthree‑year average market prices used to calculate our reserves in the Negev as of December 31, 20162018 are as follows: $752$651 per tontonne for green phosphoric acid, $1,349$1,286 per tontonne for WPA, $1,321$1,186 per tontonne for MKP, $993$290 per ton for soluble MAP, $365 per tontonne for GTSP, $189$153 per tontonne for GSSP, and $100$79 per tontonne for phosphate rock.


125

In calculating the reserves, an average of the previous three years’ currency exchange rates were used to ensure economic feasibility. The three-year average currency conversation rates used to calculate our reserves in the south as at December 31, 20162018 are as follows NIS 3.8873.68 per $1.00, $1.11$1.14 per €1.00 and $1.53$1.33 per £1.00.

The life of the mine at Rotem is approximately 65 years based on reserves of 12.510 million metric tonnes of low organic/low magnesium phosphate (given(given the current annual mining volume)volume). The low-organic, low-magnesium phosphates are suitable for phosphoric acid production. The annual production (mining) rate for the low-organic/low-magnesium phosphate at Rotem is 1.9 million metric tonnes per year.

The life of the mine at Oron is approximately 74.5 years based on a reserve of 2214 million metric tonnes and an average production of 3.03 million metric tonnes per year of white phosphate (given(given the current annual mining volume)volume). After proof of the feasibility made during 2015, the Company recognized an additional 6 million raw tonnes of low-organic phosphates were added to the report that may be sold.

In 2016, a reserve of about 7.0 million tonnes of white phosphate was added to the Oron reserves, due to approval of the new site plan for Oron Zin.

The life of the mine at Zin is approximately 1011 years based on reserves of 33.534 million metric tonnes and a production of 3.1 million metric tonnes per year as follows (given(given the current annual mining volume)volume):

·Low-organic phosphate—1.7 million metric tonnes per year

·High-organic phosphate—1.1 million metric tonnes per year

·Bituminous phosphate—0.3 million metric tonnes per year

Due to the process improvements made by the Company that were completed in 2015, the balances of the reserves were increased by 9 million tonnes of high-organic phosphates at the Zin plant. These phosphates were defined as reserves, after conducting an assessment and proving that the phosphates can be enriched using the same processes currently in use at the Zin plant.

As described under “Item 4. Information on the Company—D. Property, Plants and Equipment—Mineral Extraction and Mining Operations —The Negev Desert”, ICL primarily uses white/low organic phosphate rock in its operations which it blends in bituminous phosphate. To utilize additional resources after the reserves are utilized, ICL will be required to modify its processes and to add costly technologies.

The Company believes that it has all the government approvals and permits necessary for its reserves in Israel.


Spain

The following table sets forth

We are currently in the process of preparing our estimated potash reserves calculation for our Spanish mining operations, (all of which are wholly-owned by us) as of December 31, 2016 (latest date for which information is available):

MineReserve CategoryMillions of
metric tons
Average
Grade
(% KCl)
CabanasasProven 1626
 Probable

73

25
 Total Proven and Probable

89

25
VilafrunsProven 725
 Probable

-

-
 Total Proven and Probable

7

25
Total(1)Proven and Probable

96

25
    

(1) Amounts may not add upin part due to rounding.

In determining these reserves, a cut-off grade of potash ore containing 19% KCl was applied at the Cabanasas mine and a cut-off grade of potash ore containing a concentration of 18% KCl was applied at the Vilafruns mine.

The parameters usednew pending SEC regulations effective in determining the cut-off grade took into account the geology (continuity, structure), mining method, mining dilution, plant utilization, technical feasibility, operating costs and historical and current product prices. The parameters employed in the calculation are as follows: on-site tons (multiplying area by layer thickness and mineral density); recovery (takes into account the values obtained historically during the mining2021. As of the Cabanasasdate of this report, we have not completed this work and, accordingly, current reserve estimates for our mining operations at our Cabanasses and Vilafruns mines); recoverable tons (tons of mineral which can be mined, in terms of the recovery factor); mineable tons (recoverable tons from which the tons produced are discounted); planned dilution; unplanned dilution (5% unplanned dilution is taken into account based on the mining data and data from problematic areas); and selective mining of target layers where possible (separation of the salt within the layer in areas wherein this is possible). ICL Iberia's (IBP) annual mining program is not defined according to minimum cut-off grades.

The cut-off grade calculations come from historical yield data and ICL Iberia’s (IBP) historical experience with mining, adequately calculated and modelled by its geologists, operation engineers and economists. The calculation takes the ore grade in-site, converts it into extracted ore based on ICL Iberia’s (IBP) mining method and estimates the plant yield depending on the grade. Later on, economic models give the cut-off figures currently in use.

The proven and probable reserves above the cut-off grade were obtained taking into account the mining method, mining recovery, mining dilution, selective mining, striation, geological conditions and in-plant recovery, based on ICL Iberia’s (IBP) historical data. The mining recovery and dilution factors, which are required in the conversion of resources to reserves and take into account the particular mining method and the geological conditions at the respective mine, consist of historical yield data and are based on 18 years of historical data at the Cabanasas and Vilafruns mines and the mining recovery ranges from approximately 65% to 75% by ICL Iberia’s (IBP) “room and pillar” modified layout. Reserve quantity (in tons) and grade are quoted as those that are expected to be delivered to the treatment plant and are subject to metallurgical recovery factors. Metallurgical recovery factors consist of historical yield data and are based on the previous five years’ experience and current recoveries are 89.0% KCl for the Suria plant (which is adjacent to the Cabanasas mine) and 85.0% KCl for the Sallent plant (which is adjacent to the Vilafruns mine). Information from drillings, mostly at distances of 100 to 200 meter intervals while probable reserves have been explored by boreholes at intervals of up to 1,600 meter. The final product is well over 95% KCl to avoid quality losses.


In calculating the cut-off grade and reserves, an average of the previous three years’ market prices and operating costs was used as part of the calculations to ensure economic feasibility. The three-year average market price used to calculate our reserves for potash per ton of productoperations in Spain as of December 31, 2016 is €219.2 per ton.

In calculating the2018 were not available and are not presented herein. See “Item 3 - Key Information— D. Risk Factors— Overestimation of mineral and resource reserves an averagecould result in lower than expected sales and/or higher than expected costs and may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of the previous three years’ currency conversion rates were used as part of the calculations to ensure economic feasibility. The three-year average currency conversation rate used to calculate our reserves as at December 31, 2016 is €0.86 per dollar.

operations".

The Suria plant utilizes ore mined from CabanasasCabanasses and Vilafruns and has a current capacity to produce approximately 530,000 tons850 thousand tonnes per annum of potash. The Sallent plant utilizes ore mined from Vilafruns and has a current capacity to produce approximately 500,000 tons500 thousand tonnes per annum of product (this plant is planned to be gradually shutdown as Suria is upgraded).

product.

The Company believes that it has all government approvals and permits necessary for the reserves in Spain.

United Kingdom

The following table sets forth our estimated

At the end of the second quarter of 2018, the Company ceased the production of potash in ICL Boulby mine in the UK, due to fully depleted potash reserves and shifted to sole production Polysulphate™. As a result, we are no longer presenting reserve information for our United Kingdom mining operations (all of which are wholly-owned by us) as of December 31, 2016:

Reserve CategoryMillions of
metric tons
Average Grade
(% KCl)
Proven 335
Probable--
Total Proven and Probable335
   

In determining these reserves, a cut-off grade of ore containing 30% KCl was appliedpotash at ICL Boulby mine in both the south (onshore) and the north (offshore), for a seam having a height of 3.8 meters (although thinner sections of potash can be taken,accordance with the inclusion of salt dilution in the floor of the seam) and the maximum distance from the shafts is 15 kilometers.

In calculating the cut-off grade and reserves, an average of the previous three years’ market prices and operating costs was used as part of the calculations to ensure economic feasibility. The three-year average market price used to calculate our reserves for potash per ton of product as at December 31, 2016 is £190 per ton.

The cut-off grade calculations were made on the basis of historical yield data and ICL UK’s (CPL) historical experience with mining, adequately calculated and modeled by its geologists, operation engineers and economists. The calculation takes the ore grade in-site, converts it into extracted ore with ICL UK’s mining method and estimates the plant yield depending on the grade. Economic modeling further gives the cut-off figures currently used by ICL UK.

SEC Guide 7 rules.

Operating costs and historical and current product prices are taken into account, but the cut-off grade determination is largely influenced by optimization of the beneficiation process, in particular the flotation process, as the calculation is largely based on introducing the right grade of ore into the treatment plant.

ICL UK’s yearly mining plan is not determined by the cut-off grade. Over the last three years, the cut-off grade has remained at 30% and has not changed as a result of market price or operating cost fluctuations or as a result of currency conversion factor changes.

The parameters used in determining the cut-off grade took into account the geology (continuity, structure), mining method, mining dilution, and plant utilization. The parameters employed in the calculation are as follows: in-site tons (area multiplied by layer thickness and mineral density); mining recovery (based on values obtained historically during mining potash ore); mineable tons (recoverable tons of mineral less produced tons); and mining dilution (based on values obtained historically during mining potash).

The proven reserves above the cut-off grade were obtained taking into account losses for mining recovery, mining dilution, mining method and geological conditions based on ICL UK’s historical data. The mining recovery and dilution factors, which are required in the conversion of resources to reserves and take into account the particular mining method and the geological conditions, consist of historical yield data and are based on the previous five years’ experience and generally, the mining dilution factor reduces KCI by 10% to 17% and causes a small increase in the percentage of insoluble material. The reserve quantity and grade are quoted as those that are expected to be delivered to the treatment plant and are subject to metallurgical recovery factors. Metallurgical recovery factors consist of historical yield data and are based on the previous five years’ experience and current recovery is 81%. Proven reserves have been explored by borehole intersections typically at 150 meters intervals or less while probable reserves have been explored by boreholes at 150 to 500 meters intervals.

In 2015, as a result of depletion due to continuing mining activities, changes in geological interpretation and no new conversion of resources to reserves from ongoing exploration activities, the reserves estimates were updated. In light of the reserve update, and assuming annual potash production of about 600 thousand tons and no conversion of resources into reserves, the potash production activities in the United Kingdom are expected to end in 2019.

In the Company’s mine in the United Kingdom, we believe there are sizable resources for the purpose of increasedcontinued production of polysulphatePolysulphate™ (a mineral used in its natural form as a fully soluble and natural fertilizer, for agriculture, a fertilizeralso used for organic agriculture and as a raw material for production of specialty fertilizers), the sale of which in commercial quantities began in 2012. The Company plans to improve the production capabilities and sales to the level of one million tons by 2020.

In calculating the reserves, no currency conversion factors were used as ICL UK works onlyBeginning in British pounds.

The potash mined at Boulby has, over the past 15 years, declined in potash grade from about 40% to just over 30% KCl. The NaCl content has risen from 47% to approximately 55%, while the content of insoluble impurities has also risen from approximately 12% to about 15% over this time. The plant capacity at Boulby is approximately 3 million tons of ore per annum. The final product is potash at an average grade of 95.5% KCl. Annual potash production capacity of the production facilities is approximately 800 thousand tons.


As stated above, during 2016, the Company decidedhas been in the process of transitioning from potash extraction and production to accelerate the transition from extracting and producing potash to producing polysulphatePolysulphate™ at its ICL UKBoulby mine. In 2016,2018, ICL produced 248about 350 thousand tonnes of polysulphatePolysulphate™ and sold about 197330 thousand tonnes, for the total amount of about $25$40 million. In 2017, the Company is planning to produce about 450 thousand tonnes of polysulphate and to increase the production up to about 1 million tonnes in 2019. The Company is tracking this initiative and will obtain and provide reserve information in accordance with the SEC Guide 7 rules when this product becomes significant for the Company’s top line sales. As at the date of this Annual Report, our polysulphatePolysulphate™ production at the ICL UKBoulby mine has generated less than $25about $40 million in sales and currently is not material.considered material to the Company’s operations or financial results. Accordingly, the Company has not presented reserve information for polysulphatePolysulphate™ at ICL UK.

Boulby.

126

The Company believes that it will obtain renewal of all the government leases and licenses necessary for the reserves in the United Kingdom.

China

During 2016 a geological model was built for

Haikou Mine, and reserves calculation was done. The phosphate reserves are presented in the following table:

Haikou Minemine has 59Mt55 million tonnes (after deduction of 5%,: losses 3% and dilution 2%) of proven reserves of phosphate rock which located in 4 separated blocks (blocks 1-4). The annual mining production ratecapacity is around 2.5Mta, and the2.5 million tonnes (in 2018 2.15 million tonnes were mined). The proven reserves are sufficient for almost 2422 years at such rate. Another 4.65Mt4.4 million tonnes of phosphate is placed in several piles around the mine and this reserve will be fed to the flotation plant in the next few years

Reservesyears.

The following table sets forth our estimated phosphate reserves in Haikou Mine as of December 31, 2016:

 CategoryLow Organic PhosphateAverage
Grade
  (millions of
metric tonnes)
(% P2O5)
Block 1Proven 4.821.3%
Block 2Proven 5.921.3%
Block 3Proven 32.021.5%
Block 4Proven

16.2

21.5%

Total (Proven) 58.9 
    

2018:

CategoryLow Organic PhosphateAverage Grade
(millions of metric tonnes)
(% P2O5)

Block 1Proven 3 21%
Block 2Proven 5 21%
Block 3Proven 30 22%
Block 4Proven 17 22%
Total (Proven)  55 

The average quality of the phosphate is around 21.4% P2O5,P2O5, and is divided into 3 grades: Grade I (highest grade) > 30% P2O5,P2O5, Grade IIII- 24-30% P2O5 P2O5 and Grade IIIIII- 15-24% P2O5.P2O5. Around 20% of itthe phosphate has >27% P2O5 P2O5 and is usually beneficiated in the scrubbing facility. However, because the scrubbing plant closedfacility or in 2016, with reopening expected in 2018, the higher grade phosphate goes with the remaining 80% of the phosphate, which has around 20% P2O5, to the flotation plant for beneficiation.

or in the grinding facility.

In determining these reserves, a cut-off grade of 15% P2O5 P2O5 was applied in accordance with the flotation ability to produce usable concentrate rock (28.5% P2O5)P2O5) which is the average quality required for the production of phosphoric acid in the Yunnan region. In practice, we arethe Haikou mine is able to process and selluse all the phosphate that exists in the deposit. The phosphate layers’ borders are physically well defined, also hadhas very low P2O5 P2O5 content (usually around 5%), and the mining process does not leave any unmined phosphate behind.

The three-year average market prices used to calculate our reserves in the Haikou mine as of December 31, 20162018 are as follows: $338$394 per tonne for green phosphoric acid (MGA), $634$693 per tonne for white phosphoric acid (WPA), $850$906 per tonne for MKP, $213$223 per tonne for GTSP.

127

In calculating the reserves, an average of the previous yearsthree years’ currency exchange rates were used to ensure economic feasibility. The three-year average currency conversation rates used to calculate our reserves in the south as at December 31, 20162018 are as follows NIS 3.8873.68 per $1.00, $1.11 per €1.00 and $1.53$1.33 per £1.00 and 6.646.67 RMB per $1.00.

The life of the mine at Haikou is approximately 2422 years based on reserves of 5955 million metric tonnes (given(given the current annual mining volume)production (mining) capacity of around 2.5 million tonnes); this phosphate is suitable for phosphoric acid production. The annual production (mining) at Haikou is 2.5 million metric tonnes.

The Company believes that we have all the government approvals and permits necessary for our reserves in China.

Logistics

Israel

Part of the output of ICL’s Dead Sea facilities is transported by a conveyor belt that extends forwas built over 18.1 kilometers to the railhead located at Tzefa in Mishor Rotem.Rotem, and from there the output is transported to the Ashdod port. In addition, the Company also transports the output produced at the Dead Sea by truck, mainly to the Eilat port. Metal magnesium is transported by means of containers that are loaded on trucks from the Company's site in Sodom to the railhead at the Tzefa site. Thereafter, the Company transports the containers to the Haifa / Ashdod ports by means of train, and then transports the output from Mishor Rotem to the port of Ashdod, mainly by train. The Company built, owns and operates the conveyor belt. The Company also transports some of the output from the Dead Sea facilities by truck, mainly to the port of Eilat.

Most of ICL’s products, whether in solid or liquid state, are transported in bulk from Rotem, Oron and Zin by road orand rail to either the Ashdod port of Ashdod or Eilat.by road to the Eilat port. From Eilat, ICL’s products are transported by ship to markets in the Far East, and from Ashdod, they are transported by ship to Europe and South America.

Within the Rotem site, there is a rail loading facility that typically loads up to 30 wagons for each delivery. Approximately two1.8 million tonnes of products per year are transported by rail from the Rotem site to Ashdod. About a half a million150 thousand tonnes of products are transported by road from Rotem to the port of Eilat, since there are no rail links between the Rotem site and Eilat.

ICL’s wholly owned subsidiary

ICL Tovala is responsible for transporting phosphate rock from the Oron and Zin processing facilities in road-goingroad‑going rigid trucks and trailers. Each trailer has a payload of 40 tonnes. Approximately 200 thousand tonnes of rock leave Zin by truck for delivery to the port of Eilat. In addition, 300100 thousand tonnes are transported from Zin to Rotem for further processing. About 1processing, and about 1.1 million tonnes are transported from the Oron mine by truck for additional processing.


From Ashdod port, approximately 650 thousand tonnes of sulfursulphur are transported to Rotem each year. In addition, sulfurSulphur arrives at the port of Ashdod from overseas, where it is loaded into road-goingroad‑going trucks and transported to the Company’s sulfursulphur dispatch 5 kilometers away. At the depot, it is loaded into rail cars and then transported to Rotem.

The port of Ashdod is located on the Mediterranean coast, approximately 40 kilometers south of Tel Aviv and approximately 120 kilometers northwest of the Rotem site and the Tzefa site.

The port of Eilat is located in the far south of Israel on the Red Sea coast. It is approximately 180 kilometers due south of Rotem and about 200 kilometers from Sodom and is accessible by road. Shipments exiting the Eilat port are to the Far East, whereas sales to Europe and the U.S. exit from the Ashdod port. Sales of fertilizers and potash from Rotem and the Dead Sea are not shipped from the Haifa port since it has no infrastructure for loading bulk products and the cost of overland transport is more expensive than transport to Ashdod.


128

Spain

ICL Iberia (IBP) transports the minerals it mines from the Company's mines to the production plants as well as potash and salt from the factories and the mines to its customers and the port.

Ore is taken by 25-ton25-tonne road haulage trucks from Cabanasses to Suria plant and a conveyor belt from Vilafruns mine to Sallent plant. After the Cabanasasprocessing is completed, various quantities of potash and Vilafruns minesdifferent types of salt are produced. The final product is transferred directly to the Suria and Sallent plants, respectively. The salt product is transportedcustomer by articulated truck, to an ICL Iberia-owned (IBP) terminus in the port of Barcelona. A or train/truck fleet comprises 25-27 ton capacity articulated road trucks is used to transport the salt from the mine. Up to 40 trucks of salt per day are dispatched from the mine road tothrough the port. The mine also uses the port of Tarragona to export specific products.

A dedicateddesignated railway line is used for the transport of potash from the mines to the Barcelona port.

Most of the shipments of ICL Iberia (IBP) are made through a terminal it owns at the port of Barcelona (Trafico de Mercancias – Tramer).

A truck fleet with towing equipment having 25‑27 tonnes capacity each is used to transport the salt from the mine. Up to 120 trucks of salt per day are dispatched from the mine to the port.
ICL Iberia (IBP) owns and maintains approximately 1.5 kilometers and 3 kilometers of standard gauge railway at Suria and Sallent plants, respectively, that linkconnect to the nationalregional rail network. Each train set comprisesUntil now, up to three trains leave on a daily basis having a total payload capacity of 850 ton payload comprising approximately 20800 tonnes, spread out over about 21 freight cars. In the coming years, it is expected to increase to 24 freight cars, with two trains per working day.1,000 tonnes and up to seven daily trains. The rail route for potash transport from CabanasasSuria and Sallent to the terminal in the port of Barcelona comprises an 82about 80 kilometer rail route from(from Suria and Sallent to Manresa to the port of Barcelona and 88 kilometers from Vilafruns to the same destination.Barcelona). ICL Iberia (IBP) owns and operates its own port facilities, which consist of bulk saltpotash and potashsalt storage facilities, comprised of freight-carfreight‑car and rail-truckrail‑truck conveyor unloading facilities and product storage warehouses.

The Cabanasas/

Each of the production sites, Suria (the Cabanasses mine) and Vilafruns/Sallent complexes(the Vilafruns mine), have one rail load out system each for the rail to port transport systems. The train traction engine and part of the bulk freight car rolling stock is operated by the owner and operator FFCCFGC (Ferrocarrils de la Generalitat de Cataluña)Catalunya).

The facilities of the From time to time, Tarragona port ofis also used for storage and loading when Barcelona are managed by ICL Iberia’s subsidiary Tramer and comprises an area of 13 thousand square meters divided into three zones. port is unavailable.

As part of the plan for increasing ICL Iberia's (IBP) production capacity, an upgrade is being made of the logistical infrastructure at the Suria Site and in Cabanasses mine (entrance ramps into the mine), the factories and the Company's berth in the Barcelona port, in such a manner that will permit production, transport and export of about 2.3 million tonstonnes of potash and salt per year.


The facilities of the port of Barcelona are managed by ICL Iberia’s subsidiary Tramer and comprise an area of 13 thousand square meters divided into three zones. In order to support the expected operational expansion, the Company is in the process of setting up a new designed facility in the Barcelona port that will replace the current facility, and is making preparations for transition to use thereof. The new facility is expected to be constructed and operative towards the end of 2019 and has 56 thousand square meters and two storages. The new facilities allow to increase the train freight transport of salt and potash up to 2.3 million tonnes.
129

United Kingdom

The Boulby mine in the United Kingdom is connected by a network of roads running over 11 kilometers southward from the mine entrance, as well as a network of underground roads extending 15.517.5 kilometers from the mine entrance in the direction of the North Sea. Up to the endCirca 80 kilometers of 2016,underground tunnels having a length of more than 1,000 kilometers were opened during the salt and potash mining activities, of which 80 kilometers are still open for purposes of theto support present production. The mine has easy access to the national road and train transportation routes. The mine receives good quality drinking water and a stable supply of electricity.

Pursuant to agreements with the North Yorkshire National Parks Authority, the total transport movements by means of the network of roads from site to site are limited to a maximum of 150 thousand tonstonnes per year and a maximum of 66 road wagons per day (no road movements are allowed on Sundays or bank holidays). This limitation is not expected to interfere with the future production of ICL UKBoulby in light of its commitment to maintain the rail link to Teesdock. ICL UK'sBoulby's roads and trains are in full compliance with all the requirements.

The mine has three separate integrated conveyor load-out systems – one for each product.

The rail load-outload‑out products are transported on an ICL UK-ownedBoulby‑owned rail line which extends approximately eight kilometers from the mine entrance to a junction with the national rail network, and from there the products continue to Teesport, Middlesbrough, via the Network Rail Company, the owner and operator of the main rail line.

Eight trains per day transport Polysulphate™ and rock‑salt to the Teesdock. Most of the Polysulphate™ output is used as a component of agricultural fertilizers, where most of the quantity is exported by sea from the Teesdock seaport to customers overseas.
Rock‑salt is taken by train to Teesdock, and transported by ship to English and Scottish east coast ports for sale to local authorities for de‑icing roads.
ICL UKBoulby leases and operates three principal storage and loading facilities: the Teesdock facility, which is located on the Tees River, and two additional storage facilities that are connected to the iron rail – Cobra and Ayrton Works in Middlesbrough.

Eight trains per day transport rock-salt, potash and polysulphate to the Teesdock. Most of the output is used as a component of agricultural fertilizers, where a large quantity thereof (about 50%) is exported by sea from the Teesdock seaport to European Union countries and other customers overseas.

Rock-salt is taken by train to Teesdock, and transported by ship to English and Scottish east coast ports for sale to local authorities for de-icing roads.

In addition, ICL has storage and logistics facilities across Europe (including in Ludwigshafen, Germany, the Netherlands, Amsterdam and Rouen, France).


China

The YPH JV includes the Haikou Mine, 3C which is a factorymine, several factories for production of various types of fertilizers located close to the Haikou Mine,mine and two plants for production of performancedownstream products – one located close to the Haikou Minemine and the fertilizers factory and the other situated proximate to the KummingKunming airport.

Most of the transport of the raw materials from the Haikou Minemine to the 3C factoryacid factories is executed via pipeline (slurry), whereas a small part of the raw rock is transported by train.

trucks.

Most of the output sold to the local market is transported from 3Cthe fertilizers factory directly to the customers in North China by train, as well as through marine shipment, mainly from two exit ports (Beihai and Fangchengang) to customers in North China.. These ports are also used for import of sulfur,sulphur, in the amount of 600 thousand tonnes per year. A small part of the output sold is transported by truck to customers in the Yunnan region (the trucks are owned by the customers).

region.

130

Item 4A – UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

Not Applicable.


Item 5 – OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS


A. OPERATING RESULTS

Principal Factors Affecting Our Results of Operations and Financial Condition

We are a multinational company, the financial results of which are affected by changes in the demand for basic agricultural products, global economic trends, changes in terms of trade and financing, and fluctuations in currency exchange rates. Together with and as partIn the execution of our business strategy, we are takingtake steps to adapt our marketing and production policies to evolving global market conditions. We are also focusing on improving ourconditions, improve cash flows, diversify sources of finance, strengthen our financial position and diversifying our financing sources, and we are committed to taking continuous actions to improveoptimize efficiency and reduceminimize costs.

In 2016,2018 and 2017, approximately 54%49% and 53%, respectively, of our sales revenue was derived from production activities taking place outside Israel and approximately 6% of the cost of sales of products produced outside Israel was attributable to raw materials supplied from Israel. In 2015, approximately 55% of our sales revenue was derived from production activities taking place outside Israel7% and approximately 7%8%, respectively, of the cost of sales of products produced outside Israel was attributable to raw materials supplied from Israel. There is no single customer on which we are materially dependent, or a single costumercustomer that accounted for more than 10% of the company’sCompany’s total sales revenue in 2016.

2018.

Energy expenses accounted for approximately 6%7% of our total operating costs in 20162018 and 2015. Of these2017, increased year over year by approximately 2%. Electricity expenses in 2018 and 2017 amounted to $163 million and $190 million, respectively, comprising 47% and 56%, respectively, of the total energy expenses. Natural gas expenses in 2018 and 2017 amounted to $123 million and $87 million, respectively, comprising 35% and 25%, respectively, of the cost of oiltotal energy expenses. Oil and oil products electricityexpenses in 2018 and 2017 amounted to $15 million and $16 million, respectively, comprising 4% and 5%, respectively, of the total energy expenses.
ICL is one of the largest natural gas represented approximately 5% ($15 million), approximately 53% ($167 million)consumers in Israel and approximately 24% ($77 million), respectively,is taking measures to increase the use of natural gas in 2016 and approximately 7% ($21 million), approximately 50% ($153 million) and approximately 26% ($79 million), respectively,its facilities in 2015. Energy costs increasedorder to significantly reduce emissions of pollutants in 2016 compared with the prior year by approximately 3%. The said increase stems mainly from an increase in phosphate products quantities sold in lightarea surrounding its facilities, improve the quality of the consolidationoutput, reduce maintenance expenses and lead to a significant monetary savings due to the transition from the use of more expensive fuels.
(1)In February 2018, the Company entered into two supply agreements with Tamar and “Leviathan” reservoir (hereinafter – the Agreements), to secure its gas supply needs until the end of 2025 or until the entry of the “Karish” and “Tanin” reservoirs into service, whichever occurs first. The gas price in the Agreements is in accordance with the gas price formulas stipulated under the government’s gas outline. The Company anticipates that the scope of the annual gas consumption will be about 0.75 BCM.
131

The Company is entitled to terminate the Agreements in order to start the new agreement with Energean Israel Ltd. (hereinafter – “Energean”), which was signed in December 2017. According to the new agreement, Energean will supply up to 13 BCM of natural gas over a period of 15 years, amounting to about $1.9 billion. Energean holds licenses for development of the YPH JVKarish and an increaseTanin gas reservoirs, which are located in potash as well as industrial products quantities sold. The increaseIsrael’s territorial waters. Supply of the natural gas is expected to commence, at the earliest, in the energy costs was partly offset byfirst half of 2021, depending on completion of the changedevelopment and commencement of production of natural gas from the reservoirs, and will be used for running ICL’s factories and power stations in electricity prices and declineIsrael. In November 2018, following the completion of Energean's Financial Closing, all precedent conditions for the closing of the agreement have been met. In November 2018, all conditions precedent to the agreement with Energean have been met. Signing of the above-mentioned agreement marked an important milestone for securing a consistent supply of gas to the Company’s facilities in Israel, at a competitive price in relation to current gas prices.

supply agreements.

Marine transportation expenses in 20162018 and 20152017 were approximately 5%7% and 6% of our total operating costs, respectively, and amounted to approximately $286$355 million and $282$306 million, respectively. The beginning of 2016 was characterized with low bulk shipping prices which started to climb in the end of the first quarter, a trend which continued throughout the year and ended with an increase in marine transportation expenses is primarily attributed to the increase in marine transportation prices incompared to last year, as the fourth quarter. Themonthly average marine transportation price index (Baltic Dry Index – “BDI”) for 20162018 was 9% lower17% higher than the monthly average index for 2015. The increase in the marine transportation expenses stems primarily from an increase in potash quantities sold in light of the strike at ICL Dead Sea in 2015 and was partly offset as a result of a decline in marine transportation prices compared to the corresponding period last year deriving, among other things, from a decrease in fuel prices.

2017.

Our financial statements are preparedpresented in U.S. dollars. Most of our sales are in U.S. dollars, even though a portion of our sales is in other currencies, mainly euros. Part of our operating expenses in Israel are denominated in NIS; therefore,NIS and, consequently, devaluation of the average NIS exchange rate against the U.S. dollar has a positive impact on our profitability, while appreciation has the opposite effect. Devaluation of the average exchange rate of the euro against the U.S. dollar has a negative impact on our profitability, while appreciation has the opposite impact. On the other hand, devaluation of the euro against the U.S. dollar improves the competitive ability of our subsidiaries whose functional currency is the euro, compared with competitors whose functional currency is the U.S. dollar.

In 2018, the Company's operational results were positively impacted by the upward revaluation of the dollar, mainly against the shekel. For further information see "Results of Operation" chapter below.

We hedge againstpart of our exposure to the risks described above, in respect of thewhich include exposure to sales and operating expenses that are not denominated in our functional currency, mainly operating expenses denominated in NIS and other currencies that are not the functional currency of our subsidiaries, and exposure to marine transportation prices and energy prices. Since all of these hedging transactions are treated as economic (non-accounting)(non‑accounting) hedges, they are not reflected in our operating costs, but instead are recorded as finance income or expenses in our statements of income. Our management determinesdetermine the extent of our hedging activities, based on their estimation of our sales and operating expenses, as well as their expectations of the developments in the markets in which we operate. See “Item 11.11 - Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures Aboutabout Market Risk—Risk Management.”

Management”.

132

Trends Affecting ICL Essential Minerals Segment

There is mutual dependency between the amount of available arable land, the amount of food needed for the population, and the use of fertilizers. Natural population growth, changes in food consumption habits (a shift to richer nutrition, largely based on animal protein, which increases grain consumption) resulting from the rising standard of living, mainly in developing countries, and environmental-quality considerations along with the aspirations of certain western countries to reduce dependence on oil imports, which have strengthened the trend of shifting to production of fuel from agricultural products (bio-fuels), affect the increase in global consumption of grains (cereals, rice, soybean, corn, etc.). These trends have led to increased planting of grain crops worldwide and higher yields per unit of agricultural land, mainly through the increased application of fertilizers.

In 2016, the decrease in the prices of agricultural commodities continued, reaching their lowest level in the last decade, due to the forecast of the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) of a record harvest as a result of an increase in the planted areas along with favorable weather conditions in the primary growing areas. In the fourth quarter of 2016, the average price of the main agricultural commodities – corn, wheat, soya and rice – was 8.4% lower than in the fourth quarter of 2015.

Based on the WASDE report published by the USDA in January 2017, a small decrease is expected in the ratio of the inventories of grains to annual consumption, to 24.7% at the end of the agricultural 2016/2017 year, compared with 24.8% at the end of the 2015/2016 agricultural year, and an increase from a level of 23.6% in the 2014/2015 agricultural year.

In the short term, the demand for fertilizers is volatile and seasonal and is affected by factors such as the weather in the world’s major agricultural growing regions, fluctuations in the scope of the planting of the main crops, agricultural input costs, agricultural product prices and developments in biotechnology. Some of these factors are influenced by subsidies and credit lines granted to farmers or to producers of agricultural inputs in various countries, and by environmental regulation. Changes in currency exchange rates, legislation and international trade policy also affect the supply, demand and level of consumption of fertilizers worldwide. Notwithstanding the fluctuations that may be caused in the short term as a result of these factors, ICL estimates that the policy of most countries in the world is to ensure an orderly supply of high-quality food to their residents, including by encouraging agricultural production, which should preserve the long-term growth trend of fertilizer consumption.


Trends Affecting ICL Potash

Based on preliminary estimates of FertEcon Potash Outlook in December 2016, worldwide sales of potash in 2016 were lower than in 2015, mainly as a result of the late signing of supply contracts with China and India.

The average prices in 2016 were significantly lower than the prices in 2015, following the negative price trend that started in the second half of 2015 and continued in the first half of 2016. This trend came to a halt in the third quarter of 2016 and reversed in the fourth quarter wherein moderate price increases were recorded in the “SPOT” market. The main reasons for the decline in prices in the first half of the year were, as noted, the failure to sign contracts with China and India, a further decrease in the prices of agricultural commodities and a weakening of the currencies of the importing countries. The signing of supply contracts with Indian and Chinese customers in July 2016 and the significant volumes shipped to these countries as a result, led to tightening of the supply-demand balance, which was also supported by increased customer activity in the “SPOT” markets, mainly in Brazil. These developments supported the price stabilization and moderate recovery in the second half of the year and into 2017.

Imports of potash into China in 2016 totaled 6.8 million tonnes – a decrease of about 28% compared with imports of 9.4 million tonnes in the corresponding period last year. The record quantities of potash imported into China in 2015 caused an accumulation of large inventories in the country. This fact enabled importers to postpone the signing of contracts to the first half of 2016 and gave them a stronger bargaining position in negotiations with reference to import prices in the new contract. During In January 2016, ICL signed new framework agreements with its customers in China for supply of potash of approximately 3.4 million tonnes over the next three years, an increase of about 3% in the quantities supplied, compared with the previous three-year framework agreement. The selling price will be determined on the basis of the accepted price levels in the Chinese potash market. During July 2016, ICL signed potash supply contracts with its Chinese customers, in the total amount of 700 thousand tonnes (not including additional optional quantities), at a price of $219 per tonne CFR for delivery up to the end of 2016.

Imports of potash into India were lower in 2016 than in 2015. The slowdown stems mainly from the high inventory levels at the beginning of the year, as a result of low demand in 2015, and the delay in the contract signing for the 2016/17 fiscal year. As a result of signing of the new contract – at a significantly lower price – in the second half of the year the demand returned to normal levels. During 2016, India imported 3.8 million tonnes of potash, constituting a decrease of 4.3%, compared with 4 million tonnes imported in 2015. In 2016, the Company signed contracts for supply of potash with its Indian customers, in the total amount of 760 thousand tons, including optional quantities. In the Company’s estimation, an improvement in the demand of the farmers for potash in India is expected in 2017, assuming there is no worsening of the subsidy conditions and the weather does not have an unfavorable impact on the agriculture.

Imports of potash into Brazil in 2016 increased significantly over 2015, but did not reach the record imports recorded in 2014. In 2016, potash imports into Brazil totaled 8.8 million tonnes, constituting an increase of 5.3%, compared with imports of 8.3 million tonnes in 2015. The improvement in demand in Brazil stems from an increase in the growing areas and higher profitability of the farmers.


According to the report of the IFA from June 2016, the aggregate global demand for potash for agricultural and other uses is projected to grow at an average annual rate of 2.6%, from 38.9 million tons of K2O in 2016 up to 43.1 million tons of K2O in 2020.

Polysulphate– during 2016, the Company decided to accelerate the transition from extracting and producing potash to producing polysulphate at its ICL UK mine. ICL Potash and Magnesium will act to expand the polysulphate market by means of, among other things, development of a wide range of innovative polysulphate products.

Trends Affecting ICL Magnesium

Global demand for metal magnesium continues to be constrained by lower economic activity in China, Brazil and Europe as well as year-end destocking. In the United States, supply dynamics are impacted by pure magnesium imports from Russia, Kazakhstan and Turkey. Additionally, the general demand in the United States is being displaced as key sectors, such as, primary aluminum and titanium production, have shifted production to other markets, including Asia and Canada.Recently a number of decisions were made, that encouraged vehicle weight reduction mainly due to environmental protection requirements. As a result, a positive development has led to an increase in the demand for products based on magnesium alloys. A new Turkish manufacturer of magnesium (ESAN) has started to supply magnesium to the markets in the US and Brazil, for the purpose of making a quality check. It was expected that this supplier would expand the market supply by about 5 thousand tonnes in 2016 and about 15 thousand tonnes in 2017. Currently, it seems that this new manufacturer is not progressing as planned. Pure magnesium prices in the US and Brazilian markets remained under pressure as a consequence of the aforementioned change in supply dynamics. At the end of 2016, Chinese pure magnesium traded in the range of $2,460 - $2,480 per ton (FOB Chinese port), an increase of about 30% compared to 2015.

Trends Affecting ICL Phosphate

In 2016, the decrease in the prices of phosphate fertilizers that started in 2015 continued. These price decreases stemmed from a combination of supply and demand factors.

On the demand side, imports into India (the main importer of DAP) were low due to large inventories and an erratic monsoon season. On the other hand, expansion of the growing areas in Brazil gave rise to a significant increase in the demand for fertilizers, in general, and phosphate fertilizers, in particular. In 2016, imports of phosphate fertilizers (DAP, MAP, TSP and SSP) into Brazil reached 4.9 million tonnes, constituting an increase of 17%, compared with imports of 4.2 million tonnes in the prior year. The demand in the U.S. was low mainly as a result of a decline in the prices of agricultural commodities. The US demand picked up towards the end of 2016 and minor increases were reported in certain inland destinations, indicating a certain recovery in the US market.

On the supply side, the decline in the global demand intensified the competition in the fertilizer market. The two main competitors in the export market, the Moroccan phosphate company, OCP, and the Saudi Arabian producer, Ma’aden, reduced their sale prices in order to maintain their market shares, which were unfavorably impacted in 2015 by a massive penetration of Chinese produce. The price decline had a negative effect on the profit margins of most the Chinese manufacturers, who were forced to reduce the quantities produced. As a result, DAP exports from China, which increased by 52% and 42% in 2014 and 2015, respectively, decreased by 15% in 2016 to about 6.8 million tonnes. Based on the forecasts of market analysts, there is significant excess production capacity in China, and in the past few months production in the industry is running at 50%–60% of capacity, which brought some stability in phosphate prices in China and the world towards the end of 2016. Towards the end of 2016, the Chinese government cancelled the $14/tonne export tax on DAP. This is expected to help local exporters, but may hamper attempts to increase global prices. Nevertheless, to the best of the Company’s knowledge, the Chinese phosphate producers are planning to reduce production in 2017 to a level of 15 million tonnes compared to production of approximately 17 million tonnes in 2016 and compared to an operational capacity of 22 million tonnes.


In 2016, there was a drop in the demand for phosphate rock in the two major markets – India and China. The decline in India stemmed from an increase in imports of phosphoric acid that acted to reduce the demand for phosphate rock, despite the increase in fertilizer production. In China, the demand fell due to a decrease in production of downstream products. The decline in demand along with the decline in fertilizer prices caused a drop in the prices of phosphate rock of 5%–10%.

Over-supply in the domestic market in China along with lower international prices continue to negatively affect the results of the YPH joint venture in China. ICL is continuing its efforts to increase efficiency and reduce costs in a challenging market environment. As part of these efforts ICL reduced about 250 positions. Continued implementation of efficiency measures and a gradual shift to specialty products (up to a 50/50 balance within 4 years) are expected to support the JV’s profitability in the short and medium terms.

According to an IFA report from June 2016, the global demand phosphoric acid (which constitutes a raw material for the main phosphate fertilizers) is forecasted to grow at an annual rate of 2.4%, from a quantity of 44.5 million tonnes of phosphorous pentoxide (P2O5) in 2016 to a quantity of 48.9 million tonnes of phosphorous pentoxide up to 2020. 

Trends Affecting ICL Specialty Solutions Segment

The Specialty Solutions businesses are comprised of a large variety of products sold in many different markets and to different customers. There is therefore not one specific trend that impacts the whole segment. However, most of the specialty business lines experienced growth in 2016 in line with the trends in the world economy.

The Industrial Products business line operations are subject to the level of activity in the electronics, construction, automotive, oil drilling, furniture, pharmaceutical, agro, textile and water treatment markets. Regulation driven new sustainable polymeric and reactive bromine-based flame retardants, stabilization in the demand for products used in printed wiring boards, an increase in demand for electronic products in automotive applications and an increase in elemental bromine prices in China, all served to grow the business line in 2016 compared to 2015.

The Advanced Additives business line has benefited in 2016 from a record season of the wildfire business in North America and from increased Class B foam business, as well as from the positive contribution from the YPH JV in China, offsetting a slowdown in the Brazilian economy and in the P2S5 business.

segment

The Food Specialties business line enjoyed an increased demand in organic and protein enriched food products, while our dairy protein business was able to grow in conjunction with this demand.

The Specialty Fertilizers business line was heavily impacted by the low commodity fertilizer prices which in turn negatively affected the selling prices of specialty fertilizers. The decline in the selling prices was partially mitigated by lower prices of raw materials and an increase in quantities sold due to geographical expansion and a contribution from the YPH joint venture in China, which helped to improve the annual gross margin compared to 2015.

Trends Affecting ICL Industrial Products

The operations of ICLICL's Industrial Products are largely affected by the level of activity in the electronics, construction, automotive, oil drilling, furniture, pharmaceutical, agro, textile and water treatment markets. In 2016, 41%2018, about 40% of the worldwide use of bromine was for flame retardants, about 30% was for intermediates and industrial uses, 16%the rest was for clear brine solutions, 7% was forfluids, water treatment and 6% was for other uses.

In 2018, ICL sold approximately 240 thousand tonnes of Bromine compounds, 90 thousand tonnes of Phosphorous compounds, 40 thousand tonnes of Magnesia and Calcium products and 350 thousand tonnes of Dead Sea Salts.
Below are the trends of the business line main activities - 
Flame retardants: The trend of pressure exerted by “green” organizations in the area of environmental protection to reduce the use of bromine-based flame retardants is continuing. On the other hand, the development and commercialization of new sustainable polymeric andor reactive bromine-based flame retardants along with regulationnew fire safety regulations in additionaldeveloping countries isare serving to increase the use of these products. The worldwide economic slowdown, in general, and in China, in particular, over the past several years has triggered a slowdown in
In 2018, the demand for productsflame retardants used in the electronicsautomotive, enclosures and construction industries. During 2015TV industries as well as the telecommunication market has increased. Another growth engine is the Internet of Things trend. In addition, 2018 was characterized by continuation of stricter environmental pressure in China which had a very significant impact on availability of chemicals in the market and into 2016, there was stabilization in demand for products used in printed circuit boards and other electronic applications. In addition,led to an increase in demand for electronic products in automotive applications is creating an improvement in demand and price increases were recorded.prices. Prices of bromine compoundsbromine-based flame retardants were also supported by an increase in elemental bromine prices in China.

Sales of phosphorous-basedChina.

Demand for phosphorous‑based flame retardants were adversely impacted bywas stable and competitive pressure coming from China still exists. However, Chinese regulatory authorities continue to enforce stricter emissions standards during 2018, and marginal suppliers exited production when emissions standards could not be met. As a result, demand for some of ICL's products was higher during 2018 and prices increased. Chinese competitors resumed more of normal operations in the weakeningfourth quarter of the euro against the dollar as well as by tougher competition from the Chinese manufacturers.

2018.

Elemental bromine:In 2016,2018, continuing the trend from recent years, elemental bromine prices in China continued to increase, supported mainly by environmentally related regulation enforcement and resource depletion. Prices in the United States, Europe and India increased moderately. In China, prices increased significantly, continuing the trend of the second half of 2015.

as well.

Clear brine solutions: Following the continued low level of oil prices in 2016, thefluids: The demand in the market for clear brine solutionsfluids for the oil and gas drilling market was back to its previous level as the price of the Oil and Gas went up. There was relatively low compared to previous years.

high level of activity in the Gulf of Mexico, as well as in South America and Israel.

Biocides:The low oil and gas pricesglobal supply was affected by the environmental constraints on production set in 2016 impacted theChina. As a result, demand for biocides used for gas drilling. However, a new regulation in Europe (in-force since September 2015) allowing only registered biocide producers to supply the market increased the demand for the Company’s products.

some of ICL’s products was higher during 2018 and prices increased.

Inorganic bromides: As of April 2016, the new regulations for Mercurymercury emission control in the US are fully effective, meaning that all coal power plants are required to comply with the emission reduction rules. That stated above continued the trendNevertheless, low natural gas prices and retirements of increasing demandold coal power plants which doubled in the market for inorganic bromides for neutralizing mercury (Merquel® products).


2018 compared to 2017, negatively impacted demand. In addition, there was a moderate increase in demand for additional bromine-basedbromine‑based products as a result of improving demand in the agrochemicals markets.

Trends affecting ICL Specialty Fertilizers business line

The trend

133

Phosphorous-based industrial compounds: overall stable demand correlated to GDP growth. In developing countries, demand growth is more significant due to higher rates of declining pricesestablishment of the raw materialsnew power stations.
Organic bromine compounds: Overall stable demand correlated to GDP growth and driven by an improvement in the marketdemand for specialty fertilizersagrochemical inputs.  In addition, due to the environmentally related regulation pressure in China, the demand for ICL's products continued intermittentlyincreased during 2016,2018.
Magnesia Products: The demand for magnesia products showed a slight increase due to increased global demand for healthy food and mineral supplements. On top of that there is also high demand for pure Magnesium for industrial use such as did the impact of the average selling prices during the year. However, the declinefuel additive and glass application.
Solid MgCl2, Pure and packed KCl: 2018 was characterized by "average" winter in the selling priceseastern parts of USA which increased sales of deicing MgCl2 compared to last year. There was higher than the rate of the declinea slight growth in the raw materials prices. Notwithstandingdemand for technical grade KCl for the declineoil drilling market and higher sales of new product launched this year for animal feed with GMP+ certification. For the pure KCl we witness strong competition with new companies that established new plants and the worldwide capacity increased significantly which increased the competition in the selling prices and other market changes during 2016, the gross profit improved from the previous year’s level (an increase of 0.5%).

this market.

Trends Affecting ICL Advanced Additives

The Advanced Additives business line benefited from aPotash Segment

Potash prices increased throughout 2018 supported by record seasonpotash demand of the wildfire business in North America,66.8 million tonnes, growth of 0.3% compared to 2017 (according to CRU August 2018 and Fertecon December 2018), as well as low availability of potash due to, among other things, slower than expected ramp-up of new capacity. Prices remained firm into the off-season period of 2018 year-end and early 2019, which may be considered as a positive indication going forward. According to CRU (Fertilizer Week Historical Prices, January 2019) the average spot price of granular potash imported to Brazil during 2018 was $320 per tonne (CFR), up by approximately 22% compared to 2017.The average spot price of standard potash exported from growing business in Class B foam contributingVancouver during 2018 was $241 per tonne (FOB), up by approximately11% compared to 2017.
The Grain price index, which peaked during the second quarter of 2018, decreased during the third quarter mainly due to the overall net sales growth versustrade dispute between the priorUS and China and remained stable during the fourth quarter of 2018. On an annual basis, corn and wheat prices ended the year higher compared to 2017, year-end while soybean and rice prices decreased. According to the USDA's WASDE report (World Agricultural Supply and Demand Estimates) from February 2019, the grains stock-to-use ratio for the 2018/2019 agricultural year is expected to decrease to 29.2%, compared with 31.3% at the end of the 2017/2018 agricultural year and offsetting thiscompared with 30.6% in the 2016/2017 agricultural year. This trend of lower stock‑to‑use ratio may be supportive for fertilizer demand.
The FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the UN) published in December its updated forecast for the global cereal production in 2018 to 2,595 million tonnes, which is 62.5 million tonnes (2.4%) below last year’s slowdownrecord high.
According to official Chinese customs statistics via China Fertilizer, potash imports to China in Brazil’s economy. Acid and phosphate salt sales in2018 reached 7.49 million tonnes, a 1% decrease compared to last year.
134

According to the FAI (Fertilizer Association of India), potash imports during 2018 amounted to 4.37 million tonnes, a 1% increase over the imports during 2017.
According to ANDA (Brazilian National Fertilizer Association), potash imports to Brazil during 2018 were significantly impactedover 10.0 million tonnes, surpassing last year's record by 9%.
During 2018, the recession which negatively impacted the overall market demand. The acid and phosphate salt business in North America and Europe was under pressurenew (Greenfield) mines experienced slower than expected ramp-up, partly due to strong competition, low-priced Chinese importsoperational challenges. According to market observers K+S experiences some difficulties with the granulation stage production process in its Bethune mine in Saskatchewan (Canada), which started producing potash in June 2017, led it to deliver standard MOP to the Far East including China. In addition, K+S, closed its Sigmundshall site in Germany (capacity of 0.75 million tonnes per year in 2017). EuroChem, has cut its forecast for 2018 output from its new mines in Russia, Usolskiy (expected nameplate capacity of 3.7 million tonnes per year in 2024) and Volgakaliy (expected nameplate capacity of 4.6 million tonnes per year in 2024) to a total of about 0.3 million tonnes. Turkmenhimiya's new potash mine (Garlyk) in Turkmenistan, which was inaugurated in March 2017 (nameplate capacity of 1.4 million tonnes per year), is believed to be inoperable. Slavkaliy's Nezhinsky potash project in Belarus (expected nameplate capacity of 2 million tonnes per year) ramp-up is expected to be delayed from 2020 to 2022. Belaruskali's Petrikov project (expected nameplate capacity of 1.5 million tonnes per year in 2022) ramp-up is expected in 2020. 
Mosaic commissioned the European phosphate bannew production skip at its Esterhazy K3 mine in Saskatchewan (Canada) in December 2018. This Brownfield project is expected to reach its full operational capacity (7.35 million tonnes per year) by 2024. In Russia, there were reports of flooding at Uralkali's Solikamsk 2 mine, although it seems like there was not a significant impact on the Uralkali's production as it continued its production from the adjacent Solikamsk 1 mine. Lao Kaiyuan is expected to expand the nameplate capacity of its Khammouans site in Laos from 0.5 to 1.5 million tonnes per year until 2021. It should be mentioned that nameplate capacities are in accordance with Informa (Fertecon) Potash Outlook Report - December 2018. Other information is in accordance with CRU Fertilizer Week.  
Global demand for magnesium remains constrained in China, Brazil and Europe. This was partly offset by trade actions by US that have pushed up prices in the auto-dishwasher industry. The loss duesteel, aluminum and automotive sectors, which in turn has caused a resumption of domestic production, and consequent demand for raw materials, including magnesium.
Part of the Company's strategy is to lower pricinggrow the FertilizerpluS platform, mainly by utilizing Polysulphate as a base for a product portfolio which includes PotashpluS, PKpluS and other products. PotashpluS commercial launch took place in the fourth quarter of 2018. In addition, NPS fertilizer was partially compensated by additional volumes. The acid businesslaunched in Europe developed extraordinarily well. Additionally, the YPH JV in China contributed stronglyand the product is marketed in China and other markets. The favorable quality of ICL’s NPS compared to other NPS products contributes to solid demand. Sales of FertilizerpluS in 2018 totaled $114 million. Towards the overall sales growthend of 2018, ICL has signed a new agreement of Polysulphate and its derivatives with its customers in China for 2019 in a total quantity of 89 thousand tonnes.

135

Trends Affecting Phosphate Solutions Segment
The phosphate fertilizers market was firm during the first three quarters of 2018 and weakened during the fourth quarter, as prices softened in light of the agricultural season ending at the major phosphate fertilizers importing countries, mainly in India (DAP) and in Brazil (MAP). Prices continued to moderate in the P2O5 chain. The growth in Specialty Minerals revenue in 2016 wasbeginning of 2019 and market observers are forecasting that this trend will continue during the first half of 2019, followed by a result of a labor action in Israelstabilization in the previoussecond half of the year. The P2S5 business decreasedDemand for phosphate rock and green phosphoric acid continued to be firm during the fourth quarter of 2018. 
Average prices (according to CRU - Fertilizer Week Historical Prices, January 2019):
$ per tonne 1-12/20181-12/2017% vs 2017
DAP (Bulk CFR India Spot)42336317%
TSP (Granular Bulk FOB Morocco Spot)33827722%
MAP (Granular Bulk CFR Brazil Spot)43836919%
Phosphate Rock (68-72% BPL) (FOB Morocco Contract)91901%

Sulphur prices increased during most of 2018 but started to moderate from November 2018. Average sulphur prices in 2018 (Bulk crushed lump and gran CFR price China) were $154 per tonne, compared to $122 per tonne in 2017 and compared to $126 currently (according to CRU - Fertilizer Week Historical Prices, February 7, 2019). Market observers are forecasting that the prior year primarily due to lower volume indownward trend will continue during the first quarter and customer maintenance shutdowns. Furthermore, delay in renewalhalf of the import contract with a Mexican customer significantly decreased sales in North America in Q4.

Trends Affecting ICL Food Specialties

During 2016, the demand for organic and protein enriched food products grew, to which the Company was able to respond2019, mainly due to the weakening of the phosphates market.    

According to IFA's (International Fertilizer Association) Short-Term Fertilizer Outlook 2018–2019, global phosphate fertilizers demand in 2017/2018 increased capacityby 2% compared with 2016/2017. The ramp-up of Wa'ad Al Shamal (Saudi Arabia) project of Ma'aden, Sabic and Mosaic is slower than expected. Furthermore, Mosaic has shut down its dairy protein sub-business linePlant City phosphate facility (US). In addition, OCP's (Morocco) maintenance work as well as Chinese export reduction in combinationthe fourth quarter of 2018 have contributed to the above.          
According to IHS Markit data, Brazil imported 9 million tonnes of granular phosphate during 2018, a 0.9% increase compared to 2017. This is due to increases in SSP, TSP and NPK, which were offset by lower MAP, DAP and NP/NPS imports.
The Moroccan producer, OCP, secured 2019 first-quarter phosphoric acid contracts with its Indian partners at $750 per tonne P2O5 CFR, a decrease of $18 per tonne compared to the fourth-quarter of 2018.
According to the FAI (Fertilizer Association of India), DAP imports during 2018 increased by 49.7% to 5.99 million tonnes compared to 2017. On the other hand, domestic DAP production, decreased by 26.7% respectively to 3.55 million tonnes, mainly due to the increase in phosphoric acid contract price, but also due to the Indian rupee recovery against the US dollar during the fourth quarter of 2018, which together with a DAP domestic subsidy policy, have formed an economic preference for DAP import to India over its local production.
136

ICL's Phosphate Specialties business benefited from strong performance despite increasing global competitive pressure in certain regions. The business was successful in executing value oriented pricing approach in all regions. The pricing strategy over-compensated increased costs of major raw materials.
The business benefited from increased demand for acids from existing customers as well as new customers that used to import previously from Asia, especially in Europe.
Sales volumes of phosphate-based food additives in Europe decreased due to increased competition and the transition to a new distributor in Russia.
The salts business was impacted by higher transportation expenses caused by the low water level of Rhine River in Q4 2018, but this has normalized during December.
In North America, industrial salts and acids benefited from favorable market conditions with increased prices and improved volumes while food salts experienced volume losses in the lower value-added product lines.
In South America the phosphate salts and acids performance was stable through 2018, however market conditions were negatively impacted at the end of the year by increased low priced Chinese imports. These volume losses could be offset with the pricing strategy.
Continued growth of the P2O5 business in China was driven by increased local market share of the YPH JV as well as diversification of the acid customer base. The groundbreaking ceremony for the new food grade white phosphoric acid plant in the YPH JV took place in August, as part of the Company's strategy to increase specialty products production and sales. The 70 thousands tonnes P2O5 capacity plant is expected to be completed during the fourth quarter of 2019. 
The Paints and Coatings business experienced strong performance during the year benefiting from continuing R&D activity. During 2016, ICL Food Specialties opened laboratories in China and South America in order to extend regional application development activities and customer-related projects. Another important trend on which ICL Food Specialties focuses is theefforts.
The vegetarian and flexitarian consumer behavior regardingstill shows an increasing demand for healthier food, which ICL Foodled, in response, to new developments in food salts and additives product portfolio. Phosphate Specialties business has further developed its ROVITARIS® line for meat replacements and is continuously working on strategic partnerships to extend the market activities. Those activities enabled
The Dairy protein business experienced improved demand of a key account in the Company toChinese market and benefited from the ongoing customer base diversification and continuous focus on developmentdeveloping organic dairy solutions for the infant food industry. In July 2018, ICL divested and transferred the assets and business of customer-specific solutionsRovita GmbH which produces a commodity milk protein. In 2018 the business reported sales of $16 million and ledoperating loss of approximately $3 million compared to a$32 million in sales and $4 million in operating loss in 2017.
137


Trends affecting Innovative Ag Solutions segment
Innovative Ag Solutions segment is active in two main markets: agriculture and turf & ornamental markets. The specialty fertilizers business is characterized by higher efficiency resulting in higher prices and lower quantities compared to the traditional commodity fertilizers.
Traditional Commodity producers continue to step into the specialty fertilizers markets, offering specialized, higher value and higher price products. Consolidation is another global trend, characterized by mergers of large fertilizer suppliers as well as acquisition of small specialty fertilizer players by the large input players.
Specialty Agriculture markets
The specialty agriculture markets include all open field crops (rice, maize, potatoes etc.), orchards and greenhouses.
ICL's offerings for the specialty agriculture sector include three main product groups: (1) Soluble fertilizers, which includes water-soluble straights (such as MKP, MAP and Pekacid), and water‑soluble NPK; (2) controlled release fertilizers (CRF), and; (3) liquids NPKs.
Specialty agriculture markets are constantly growing, driven by global population growth, lack of arable land and regulation. New regulations, both local and national, requires limiting the amount of fertilizers applied, thus increasing the usage of efficient fertilizers application. An example for such regulation can be found in limiting the nitrogen usage in China, and controlling the nitrogen leaching in some countries in Europe. demand growth is significant revenuein China, India and Brazil while in Europe growth together with new products, which is expected to continuemore moderate. This growth was inhibited by economic crises in Turkey, but this market is gradually recovering since early 2019.
The competitive landscape in the next year. soluble fertilizer markets continues to develop, with commodity players, such as Eurochem, strengthening their position in the specialty markets with full range offer of water soluble MAP, water soluble NPK and NOP.
The defined phosphates business encountered headwindsCRF markets are under pressure in North America due to increasing competition. InChina – which shows the highest growth alongside increased production capacity (mainly from Kingenta), as well as in the US, although the main capacity increase can be found in the lower quality CRF type (e.g. Pursell in Alabama).
Turf and Ornamental Horticulture
Turf and Landscape
The Turf and Landscape market is the market for professional turf (i.e. golf & sport fields) and the landscape & lawn service market.
The market for specialty fertilizers in Europe the turnoverin 2018 was unfavorablymainly impacted by the increasing strengthlate Spring and the severe drought during the Summer of 2018. This limited the number of applications of granular fertilizers during the season in golf and sport fields. However, the drought drove demand for liquids & wetting agents. Usually after a drought demand for seeds increase due to the need to renovate the turf.
138

The Landscape market is growing fast in Europe due to the fact that more consumers use professional landscapers.
Prices of raw materials and end products remained relatively flat during 2018.
There is a slow but noticeable trend of consolidation in the distribution chain in the Turf & Landscape market.
Ornamental Horticulture
The Ornamental Horticulture market includes container nursery growers, pot-plants and bedding plants. Global demand has moderately recovered due to the improvement in global economy contributing to the housing and landscape market.
The drought in Europe improved demand for plants as consumers and public gardens are renewing their plants who suffered from the high temperatures.
In the US dollar.the market for specialty fertilizers in the ornamental horticulture market remained competitive. In addition, the sales to Europe were negatively impacted by the continuing financial crises in Russia,2018 capacity as import regulations and conditionswell as number of suppliers for products from western Europe are still unfavorable. The market demand is expected to remain flat into the first half of 2017, in combination with increasing price pressure due to aggressive competition.

controlled release fertilizers increased.

Expected Expenses for Equity Compensation Plans

Based on the existing grants under the 2014 Equity Compensation Plan, Thethe expected expense for the periods ended December 31, 2017,2019, December 31, 20182020 and December 31, 20192021 is about $6.4approximately $6.3 million, about $2.2$2.1 million, and about $0.2$0.3 million, respectively.

For a description of the 2014 Equity Compensation Plan and additional information about the grants made under the 2014 Equity Compensation Plan, see Note 21 to our auditedAudited Financial Statements.

139

Adjustments to reported operating and net income (Non-GAAP financial statements.

measures)
We disclose in this Annual Report non-IFRS financial measures titled adjusted operating income and adjusted net income attributable to the Company’s shareholders. Our management uses adjusted operating income and adjusted net income attributable to the Company’s shareholders to facilitate operating performance comparisons from period to period.  We calculate our adjusted operating income by adjusting our operating income to add certain items, as set forth in the reconciliation table below. Certain of these items may recur. We calculate our adjusted net income attributable to the Company’s shareholders by adjusting our net income attributable to the Company’s shareholders to add certain items, as set forth in the reconciliation table below, excluding the total tax impact of such adjustments and adjustments attributable to the non-controlling interests.
You should not view adjusted operating income or adjusted net income attributable to the Company’s shareholders as a substitute for operating income or net income attributable to the Company’s shareholders determined in accordance with IFRS, and you should note that our definitions of adjusted operating income and adjusted net income attributable to the Company’s shareholders may differ from those used by other companies. However, we believe adjusted operating income and adjusted net income attributable to the Company’s shareholders provide useful information to both management and investors by excluding certain expenses that management believes are not indicative of our ongoing operations. Our management uses these non-IFRS measures to evaluate the Company's business strategies and management's performance. We believe that these non-IFRS measures provide useful information to investors because they improve the comparability of the financial results between periods and provide for greater transparency of key measures used to evaluate our performance.
The table below reconciles total adjusted operating income and total adjusted net income attributable to the shareholders of the Company, to the comparable IFRS measures:

140

 For the Year Ended December 31,
 20182017201620152014
 US$ millions

Operating income (loss)1,519629(3)765758
Impact of employee strike (1)---24817
Capital (gain) loss (2)(841)(54)1(215)(36)
Impairment of assets (3)19324899071
Provision for early retirement and dismissal of employees (4)7203948-
Provision for legal claims (5)3125538149
Provision for historical waste removal and site closure costs (6)18-5120-
Other----1
Total adjustments to operating income (loss)(766)23585229202
Adjusted operating income753652582994960
Net income (loss) attributable to the shareholders of the Company1,240364(122)509464
Total adjustments to operating income (loss)(766)23585229202
Adjustments to finance expenses (7)10-38-31
Total tax impact of the above operating income & finance expenses adjustments(7)(4)(81)(58)(64)
Tax assessment and deferred tax adjustments (8)-6361962
Adjustments attributable to the non-controlling interests--(5)--
Total adjusted net income - shareholders of the Company477389451699695

This table includes various adjustments that were presented in separate lines in prior years. The adjustments are the same as in prior years and only the tabular presentation has changed.
(1)  Loss due to the strike that occurred in the Company’s facilities in Israel – in 2014 in ICL Rotem and in 2015 in DSW and ICL Neot Hovav.
(2) Capital loss (gain) from sale of low synergy businesses, transaction expenses relating to sale and acquisition of businesses and gain from consolidation and deconsolidation of businesses. In 2014, income from consolidation of previous equity method investee (increase in the rate of holdings from an investment accounted for using the equity method of accounting), in respect of a company in Brazil. In 2015, capital gain deriving mainly from the sale of low synergy business activities and from consolidation of previous equity method investee (Allana Afar). In 2017, capital gain from IDE divestiture, capital gain from the deconsolidation of Allana Afar in Ethiopia and additional consideration received regarding earn-out of 2015 divestitures. In 2018, capital gain from the sale of the Fire Safety and Oil Additives (P2S5) businesses. See also – Note 10 to our Audited Financial Statements.
141

(3)  Impairment in value and write down of assets. In 2014, with respect to a write down of assets of a subsidiary in the United States in view of the decline in the selling prices of the Company's products as a result of its competitors' strategy to increase their market share, and in view of the cancellation of the anti-dumping tax on Japanese chlorine-based biocide manufacturers in the fourth quarter of 2014, and impairment in the value of the activities classified as “held for sale” pursuant to IFRS 5 in Europe. In 2015, with respect to impairment in value of the activities classified as “held for sale” pursuant to IFRS 5 in Europe and in the United States and impairment in the value of assets of the Bromine facilities in Israel in view of the decision of the Company’s management regarding the continued use of various facilities on the Company's sites. In 2016, with respect to the write down of assets (including closure cost) relating to the global ERP project (Harmonization Project), write down of assets relating to discontinuance of the activities of Allana Afar in Ethiopia (including closure cost), and impairment in the value of assets of a subsidiary in the United Kingdom. In 2017, relating to impairment of an intangible asset in Spain, write-down of an investment in Namibia and impairment of assets in China and the Netherlands. In 2018, write-off of Rovita’s assets following its divestment and write-off of an intangible asset regarding a specific ICL R&D project related to ICL’s phosphate-based products. See also – Note 13 to our Audited Financial Statements.
(4) Provision for early retirement and dismissal of employees in accordance with the Company’s comprehensive global efficiency plan in its production facilities throughout the group. In 2015, with respect to the Bromine’s facilities in Israel and the Company’s facilities in the United Kingdom. In 2016, with respect to the Bromine’s facilities in Israel, the Company’s facilities in the United Kingdomand the facilities of the joint venture in China (reflected also in the non-controlling interests’ adjustment below). In 2017, provisions relating to ICL Rotem’s facilities in Israel, and to subsidiaries in North America (Everris NA Inc.) and Europe (Everris International B.V and BK Giulini GmbH). In2018, provision relating to the Company’s facility in the United Kingdom (ICL Boulby). See also – Note 18 to our Audited Financial Statements.
(5) Provision for legal claims. In 2014, provision in connection with prior periods in respect of royalties’ arbitration in Israel. In 2015, stemming mainly from provision in connection with prior periods in respect of costs of management services of the electricity system in DSW and ICL Rotem, pursuant to the Israeli Public Utilities Authority Electricity's resolution from 2015, to impose certain electricity system management services charges also on private electricity producers as opposed to only on private consumers, retroactively from June 2013, a provision in connection with prior periods in respect of royalties’ arbitration in Israel  and the settlement agreement that ended the Class Action brought by the farmers in Israel regarding potash prices. In 2016, stemming mainly from a provision in connection with prior periods in respect of royalties’ arbitration in Israel, the arbitration award ending the commercial price dispute with Haifa Chemicals and reversal of the provision for retroactive electricity charges in connection with prior periods. In 2017, a provision following the judgement relating to a dispute with the National Company for Roads in Israel regarding damage caused to bridges by DSW, a provision following a decision of the European Commission concerning past grants received by a subsidiary in Spain, a provision relating to claims for damages related to the contamination of the water in certain wells at the Suria site in Spain, a provision in connection with prior periods in respect of royalties’ arbitration in Israel, reversal of the provision for retroactive electricity charges in connection with prior periods, and settlement of the dispute with Great Lakes(a subsidiary of Chemtura Corporation). In 2018, an increase of a provision in connection with prior periods in respect of royalties’ arbitration in Israel, partly offset by a VAT refund related to prior periods in Brazil (2002-2015). See also – Note 20 to our Audited Financial Statements.
142

(6) Provision for removal of waste in respect of prior periods and site closure costs. In 2015, in respect of removal of historical waste stemming from bromine production at the facilities in Israel in light of the government’s requirement to accelerate the waste removal schedule leading to additional cost of implementing a different technology. In 2016, provision for closure costs in the Sallent site in Spain related to the purification and removal of historical waste from the potash activities as a result of decisions made by the Spanish authorities in connection with the plan for treating the salt pile in the Sallent site leading to plan changes mainly related to the water pumping process involved in the salt treatment, and an increase of the provision in 2018 for the Sallent site closure costs as part of the restoration solution.
(7)  Interest and linkage expenses, mainly in connection with the royalties’ arbitration and tax assessments in Israel and Belgium relating to prior periods. In 2014, in connection with the royalties’ arbitration relating to prior periods. In 2016, in connection with the royalties’ arbitration relating to prior periods, and relating to a tax assessment in Israel relating to prior periods. In 2017, provision in light of a decision of the European Commission above and income following the resolution of the Appeals Court for Tax matters in Belgium. In 2018, increase of provision related to the royalties’ arbitration in Israel. See also – Note 17 and Note 20 to our Audited Financial Statements.
(8) In 2014, relating to a provision for taxes as a result of a change in Spain's Supreme Court judgment relating to prior periods. In 2015, relating to deferred taxes adjustment of prior periods in the magnesium. In 2016, relating to tax assessment in Israel and Belgium relating to prior periods. In 2017, tax provision as a result of an internal transaction in preparation of low synergy business divestitures (it should be noted that the capital gain from the divestment of the Fire Safety and Oil Additives (P2S5) businesses was adjusted in 2018) and tax income relating to the resolution of the Appeals Court for Tax matters in Belgium. See also – Note 10 and Note 17 to our Audited Financial Statements.

143

Results of Operations

We have based the

The following discussion is based on our consolidated financial statements. Youstatements and should be read the following discussion together with our consolidated financial statements.

We presenthave presented below, a discussion of the period-to-period changes in the period-to-period comparisonsCompany’s results of operations, and the primary drivers of changes in the company’s results of operations.these changes. These discussions are based in part on management’s best estimates of the impact of the main trends in its businesses.

Year Ended December 31, 20162018 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2015

2017

Set forth below are our results of operations for the years ended December 31, 20162018 and 2015.

 For the Years Ended
December 31,
%
Increase
(Decrease)
 20162015 
 $ millions$ millions 
Sales5,363 5,405(1)%
Cost of sales3,7033,6023%
    
Gross profit1,660 1,803(8)%
    
Selling, transport and  marketing expenses722 65311%
General and administrative expenses321 350(8)%
Research and development expenses73 74(1)%
Other expenses618 211193%
Other income(71)(250)(72)%
    
Operating income (loss)(3)765(100)%
    
Finance expenses, net13210822%
    
    
Share in earnings of equity-accounted investees181164%
    
Income (loss) before income taxes(117) 668(118)%
    
Income taxes55162(66)%
    
Net income (loss)(172)506(134)%
    
Net income (loss) attributable to the shareholders of the Company(122) 509(124)%
    
Earnings (loss) per share attributable to the shareholders of the Company:   
    
Basic earnings (loss) per share (in cents)(10)40 
Diluted earnings (loss) per share (in cents)(10)40 
    
2017.
 For the Years Ended December 31,
%
Increase
(Decrease)
 20182017
 $ millions$ millions 
Sales 5,556 5,4183%
Cost of sales 3,702 3,746(1)%
    
Gross profit 1,854 1,67211%
    
Selling, transport and marketing expenses 798 7467%
General and administrative expenses 257 261(2)%
Research and development expenses 55 55-
Other expenses 84 90(7)%
Other income (859) (109)688%
    
Operating income 1,519 629141%
    
Finance expenses, net 158 12427%
    
Share in earnings of equity-accounted investees 3--
    
Income before income taxes 1,364 505170%
    
Provision for income taxes 129 158(18)%
    
Net income 1,235 347256%
    
Net income attributable to the shareholders of the Company 1,240 364241%
    
Earnings per share attributable to the shareholders of the Company:   
    
Basic earnings per share (in dollars) 0.97 0.29235%
    
Diluted earnings per share (in dollars) 0.97 0.29235%


144

Results of operations for the year 2018

Sales

Sales analysis$ millionsSales
Total sales 2015Expenses5,405
Quantity 570
Price (580)
Exchange rate(32)
Total sales 20165,363Operating income 
 
$ millions
 

YTD 2017 figures 5,418 (4,789) 629 
Total adjustments YTD 2017 *- 23 23 
Adjusted YTD 2017 figures 5,418 (4,766) 652 
Divested businesses 2017 (343) 221 (122) 
Adjusted YTD 2017 figures (excluding divested businesses) 5,075 (4,545) 530 
Quantity (87) 77 (10) 
Price 419- 419 
Exchange rate 99 (93) 6 
Raw materials- (88) (88) 
Energy- (2) (2) 
Transportation- (41) (41) 
Operating and other expenses- (64) (64) 
Adjusted YTD 2018 figures (excluding divested businesses) 5,506 (4,756) 750 
Divested businesses 2018 50 (47) 3 
Adjusted YTD 2018 figures 5,556 (4,803) 753 
Total adjustments YTD 2018 *- 766 766 
YTD 2018 figures 5,556 (4,037) 1,519 

* See "Adjustments to reported operating and net income (Non-GAAP)" above.
-
QuantitySales –  the Company sales increased by $138 million compared to 2017. The increase derives mainly from an increase in the selling prices of potash sales,(a $42 increase in lightthe average realized price per tonne compared to the corresponding period last year), phosphate fertilizers, phosphate-based acids and food additives (as part of the strikevalue-focused strategy), specialty agriculture products and a positive price impact in 2015 (amountingthroughout most of Industrial Products segment’s business lines (see 'Price' above), as well as a positive exchange rate contribution, mainly due to $452 million) and consolidationthe average upward revaluation of the YPH joint venture (which contributed $262 million). Thiseuro against the dollar (see ‘Exchange rate’ above) and an increase was partly offset as a resultin the quantities sold of salesdairy proteins, bromine- and phosphorous-based flame retardants and specialty agriculture products (part of non-core businesses.the change in the ‘Quantity’ line above).

The increase was partly offset by the divestiture of the Fire Safety and Oil Additives businesses (see 'Divested businesses' rows above) and a decrease in the quantities sold of potash, phosphate fertilizers and phosphate-based acids and food additives (see ‘Quantity’ above).
-
PriceCost of sales– the cost of sales decreased by $44 million compared to 2017. The decrease derives mainly from the divestiture of the Fire Safety, Oil Additives and Rovita businesses (see 'Divested businesses' rows above) together with a decreasedecline in the pricesquantities sold of potash, phosphate fertilizers and phosphate fertilizers.phosphate-based acids and food additives (see ‘Quantity’ above).

145

The decrease was partly offset by an increase in raw materials prices, mainly Sulphur, which increased costs of main raw materials throughout the phosphate value chain, raw materials used for bromine- and phosphorous-based flame retardants and various raw materials used for products of Innovative Ag Solutions segment (see ‘Raw materials’ above) together with the average upward revaluation of the euro against the dollar, which increased production costs (see ‘Exchange rate’ above) and an increase in the quantities sold of dairy proteins, bromine- and phosphorous-based flame retardants and specialty agriculture products (see ‘Quantity’ above).
-
Exchange rateSelling and marketingthe negative impact stemsselling and marketing expenses increased by $52 million compared to 2017. The increase derives mainly from an increase in marine transportation prices and exchange rate fluctuations (see ‘Transportation’ and ‘Exchange rate’ above).
-
General and administrative – general and administrative expenses decreased by $4 million compared to 2017. The company successfully maintained low level of general and administrative expenses following the devaluationefficiency measures that took place in 2017.
-
Other income, net - other income, net, increased by $756 million compared to 2017. The increase derives mainly from capital gain recorded from the sale transaction of the pound againstFire Safety and Oil Additives businesses, partly offset by capital gains recorded in the dollar.previous year related to divestiture of businesses, mainly IDE (see ‘Adjustments to reported operating and net income – Non-GAAP financial measures’ above).

Below is a geographical breakdown of our sales by customer location:

 Year Ended December 31,
 20162015
 $  millions$  millions
Europe1,8632,012
Asia1,2751,118
North America1,1411,253
South America588585
Rest of the world496437
Total5,3635,405
   

The breakdown of sales


 Year Ended December 31,
 20182017
 $ millions$ millions
Europe 1,970 1,918
Asia 1,488 1,342
North America 978 1,175
South America 712 666
Rest of the world 408 317
Total 5,556 5,418


Europe – the increase derives mainly from an increase in the year ended December 31, 2016 , indicatesquantities sold and selling prices of potash and bromine-based flame retardants, quantities sold of specialty agriculture products, selling prices of phosphorous-based flame retardants, together with the positive impact of the average upward revaluation of the euro against the dollar. The increase was partly offset mainly as a decreaseresult of divested businesses together with a decline in the sales in Europe stemminggreen phosphoric acid quantities sold.
Asia – the increase derives mainly from a decreasean increase in quantities sold of dairy proteins and specialty agriculture products, together with an increase in the selling prices of potash, phosphate productsfertilizers and potash, sale of non-core business activitiesbromine‑based flame retardants and industrial solutions. The increase was partly offset by a decline in green phosphoric acid quantities sold.
North America – the decrease derives mainly from divestiture of the Fire Safety and Oil Additives (P2S5) businesses and a decrease in the quantities sold of dairy proteins sold due to redirecting of sales mainly to Australia. Thispotash. The decrease was partly offset by an increase in the selling prices and quantities sold of bromine-based products. Thephosphate fertilizers, quantities sold of clear brine fluids and phosphorous-based flame retardants and selling prices of potash.

146

South America – the increase derives mainly from an increase in salesthe selling prices of potash, partly offset by a decrease in Asia derived mainly from consolidationpotash quantities sold.
Rest of the YPH joint venture in China andworld – the increase derives mainly from an increase in the quantities sold of bromine-based flame retardantsdairy proteins products, clear brine fluids and elemental bromine. electricity surplus to third parties from ICL's new power plant in Sodom. 
Financing expenses, net
The declinenet financing expenses in sales in North America stems mainly from the sale of non-core businesses, a decline in the selling prices of potash and a decrease in clear brines quantities sold. This decrease was partly offset by2018 amounted to $158 million, compared with $124 million last year – an increase in the sales of fire safety products.$34 million. The increase in sales in South Americachange derives mainly from an increase in potash quantities sold, whichrespect of the change in exchange rate differences and hedging transaction results, in the amount of $36 million.
An additional increase of $10 million derives from interest on past royalties recognized in 2018 as a result of a decision in the arbitration between the State and the Company (for further information see note 20 to our Audited Financial Statements).
This increase was partly offset by a decline in the quantitiesinterest expenses, in the amount of phosphoric acid sold$11 million, mainly due to the significant reduction of net financial liabilities, by using the proceeds received from the sale of the Fire Safety and Oil Additives (P2S5) businesses.
Furthermore, in 2018 and 2017, the Company paid fees regarding early repayment of long term loans of about $12 million and $13 million, respectively.
Tax expenses
The tax expenses in 2018 amounted to $129 million, reflecting an effective tax rate of about 9%, which is significantly lower than the Company’s usual tax rate, mainly due to exempt income as a result of the economic slowdown in Brazil.


Operating expenses

Operating expenses analysis$ millions
Total operating expenses 20154,640
Quantity 290
Exchange rate (35)
Raw materials (145)
Energy (35)

 Transportation

 70
Other

581

Total operating expenses 2016

5,366

-Cost of sales - the cost of sales increased by $101 million compared to 2015. The increase derived mainly from operating expenses of the YPH joint venture and an increase in the quantities of potash and bromine-based products sold as a result of the strike impact in 2015 (amounting to $150 million). The increase was partially offset by a positive impact stemming mainly from devaluation of the pound against the dollar, a decline in sulfur prices (used in green phosphoric acid production), a decrease in the price of commodity fertilizers used as raw materials in ICL Specialty Fertilizers products, a decline in raw-material prices of bromine-based and phosphorous-based products and a decrease in electricity and gas costs.

-Selling and marketing - selling and marketing expenses increased by $69 million compared to 2015. The increase stems mainly from an increase in the quantities of potash sold, in light of the strike impact in 2015 (amounting to $54 million) and the transportation expenses of the YPH joint venture. This increase was partly offset by a decrease in transportation prices.

-General and administrative – general and administrative expenses decreased by $29 million compared to 2015. The decrease stems mainly from efficiency measures and cost cutting initiatives implemented in 2016, including reduction in professional service costs, which was partially offset by the YPH joint venture’s general and administrative expenses.

-Other expenses, net - other expenses, net, increased by $586 million compared to 2015. The increase derived mainly froma write down of assets (including expected closure costs) relating to the global ERP (Harmonization) project, in the amount of $282 million, a write down of assets relating to discontinuance of the activities of Allana Afar in Ethiopia (including expected closure costs), in the amount of $202 million, a provision for purification and removal of historical waste from the potash activities in Spain, in the amount of $51 million, early retirement provisions due to the efficiency plan, in the total amount of $39 million, a provision in connection with prior periods in respect of the royalties’ arbitration in Israel, in the amount of $13 million, a provision for legal claims stemming mainly from the agreement the Company signed with Haifa Chemicals, in the amount of $8 million, and an impairment in the value of assets of a subsidiary in the United Kingdom, in the amount of $5 million. This increase was partly offset by income from update of a provision in connection with prior periods relating to costs of management services of the electricity system in DSW and ICL Rotem, in the amount of $16 million.


Financing expenses, net

The net financing expenses in the year ended, amounted to $132 million, compared with $108 million in the corresponding period last year – an increase of $24 million.

The increase includes an increase of $52 million deriving mainly from:

·An increase in the interest expenses due to an increase in both the total debt and the interest rate.

·Interest expenses stemming from a tax assessment agreement signed with the Israeli Taxes Authority relating to prior periods and interest on past royalties recognized in the current period as a result of a decision in the arbitration between the State and the Company, in the amount of $38 million.

On the other hand, there was a decreasedivestment of the financing expenses, inbusinesses at the amount of about $28 million, stemming mostly from the following items:

·A decrease in expenses in respect of the fair value of foreign currency hedging transactions, energy and marine shipping, as well as a revaluation of net liabilities.

·A decrease in the interest expenses relating to employee benefits.

Tax expenses

The tax expenses in the year ended, amounted to $55 million compared with tax expenses of $162 million in the corresponding period last year. The decline in the tax expenses in the current period stems mainly from unusual events that occurred in the current period. The effective tax rate on the adjusted income before tax is about 30%, compared with an effective tax rate on the adjusted income before tax in the corresponding period last year of about 25%. The increase in the effective tax rate stems mainly from applicationend of the Natural Resources Tax in Israel to the bromine activities and reduction in tax benefits arising from the reduced tax rate applicable to a “Preferred Enterprise” and a “Benefited Enterprise”.


Year Ended December 31, 2015 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2014

Set forth below are our resultsfirst quarter of operations for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014.

 For the Years Ended December 31,%
Increase
(Decrease)
 20152014 
 $ millions$ millions 
Sales5,405 6,111(12)%
Cost of sales3,6023,915(8)%
    
Gross profit1,803 2,196(18)%
    
Selling, transport and  marketing expenses653 839(22)%
General and administrative expenses350 30614%
Research and development expenses74 87(15)%
Other expenses211 259(19)%
Other income(250)(53)372%
Operating income7657581%
Finance expenses, net108157(31)%
Share in earnings of equity-accounted investees1131(65)%
Income before income taxes6686326%
Income taxes162166(2)%
Net income5064669%
Net income attributable to the shareholders of the Company509 46410%
Earnings per share attributable to the shareholders of the Company:   
    
Basic earnings per share (in cents)4037 
Diluted earnings per share (in cents)4037 
    

Sales

Sales analysis$ millions
Total sales 20146,111
Quantity(395) 
Price25 
Exchange rate(336) 
Total sales 2015

5,405


-Quantity- the decrease stems mainly from the strike impact (amounting to $452 million) and sales of non-core businesses which was partly offset as a result of the consolidation of the YPH joint venture.

-Price- the increase stems mainly of an increase in the prices of phosphate fertilizers.

-Exchange rate- the decrease stems mainly from the devaluation of the euro against the dollar.

Below is a geographical breakdown of our sales according to customer location:

 Year Ended December 31,
 20152014
 $  millions$ millions
Europe2,0122,389
Asia1,1181,299
North America1,2531,374
South America585569
Rest of the world437480
Total5,4056,111
   

The breakdown of sales in the year ended December 31, 2015, shows a decrease in the sales in Europe derived mainly from sale of non-core businesses, weakness of the euro and the British pound against the U.S. dollar, a decline in the quantities sold of phosphorous-based flame retardants and elemental bromine and a decline in the price of the potash sold. This decline was partly offset by the first-time consolidation of companies acquired. The decline in sales in Asia derived primarily from a decrease in quantities of potash sold in India, mainly due to the strike at ICL Dead Sea, a decline in sales of elemental bromine and bromine-based flame retardants, mainly as a result of the strike, and from sale of non-core businesses. This decrease was partly offset by the impact of the first-time consolidation of the joint venture in China and by an increase in the quantities sold and selling price of the green phosphoric acid in India. The decline in sales North America derived mainly due to a decrease in the quantities and price of the potash sold, which is partly the result of the strike at ICL Dead Sea and a decline in the quantities sold of bromine-based and phosphorous-based flame retardants, bromine-based biocides and magnesium chloride. This decline was partly offset by an increase in sales of fire prevention and flame-retardant products in ICL Advanced Additives. The increase South America mainly from the contribution of the acquisition of Fosbrasil and an increase in quantities of phosphate rock sold. This increase was partly offset as a result of a drop in the quantities of potash sold, among other things, due to the strike at ICL Dead Sea and a decline in the price of the potash sold.


Operating expenses

Operating expenses analysis$ millions
Total operating expenses 20145,353
Quantity32
Exchange rate(350)
Raw materials(15)
Energy(5)
Transportation

(85)

 
Other(290) 
Total operating expenses 2015

4,640

-Cost of sales - the cost of sales decreased by $313 million compared to 2014. The decrease derives primarily from the impact of the change in currency exchange rates, in the amount of $288 million, mainly due to the devaluation of the euro, the shekel and the Brazilian real against the dollar, a decrease in costs resulting from divestitures of non-core businesses)net of costs from provision of services in a subsidiary in Germany which is not part of the Company's core businesses and which is designated for sale) in the amount of $208 million, the impact of the strike at ICL Dead Sea and at ICL Neot Hovav, in the amount of $150 million, a decrease in the quantities produced and sold deriving from the impact of the fire in a fertilizers production facility in Israel, in the amount of $36 million, compensation received from the Manufacturers Association relating to the strike, in the amount of $17 million, and a drop in the energy prices, in the amount of $9 million. This decrease was partly offset by an increase in the quantities sold (excluding the impact of the strike), including the first-time consolidation of companies acquired, in the amount of $374 million, and an increase in raw-material prices, in the amount of $5 million, mainly as a result of the increase in sulfur prices. The cost of sales in 2014 included the negative impact of the strike at ICL Rotem, in the amount of $26 million.

-Selling and marketing -selling and marketing expenses decreased by $186 million compared to 2014. The decrease in the expenses is attributable mainly to sale of non-core businesses, a decline in the quantities sold due to the strike at ICL Dead Sea and at ICL Neot Hovav, the impact of the change in the currency exchange rates and a decline in shipping prices.

-General and administrative – general and administrative expenses increased by $44 million compared to 2014. The increase in the general and administrative expenses stems mainly from acquisition of new companies and professional service costs relating to these acquisitions, expenses with respect to the equity compensation plans granted to employees, implementation costs of the global ERP system and other professional service costs in connection with implementation of the Company's strategy, including establishment of the shared services centers (SHS).

-Research and development - research and development expenses decreased by $13 million compared to 2014. The decrease stems mainly from a decline in activities as a result of the strike at ICL Dead Sea and at ICL Neot Hovav, as well as a decline in activities relating to the non-core businesses sold during the year.

-Other expenses, net - other expenses, net, decreased by $245 million compared to 2014. The decrease stems mainly from sale of non-core businesses in the amount of $215 million and from high expenses recognized in 2014, relating to prior periods due to an arbitration decision with respect to royalties relating to downstream products, in the amount of $149 million, and due to a decline in the value of assets of subsidiaries in the United States and Europe, in the amount of $71 million. This decrease was partly offset by impairment in the value of assets located in Germany, Israel and the United States, in the amount of $90 million, a provision for early retirement in Bromine and in ICL UK as a result of the efficiency plan, in the amount of $48 million, income recognized in 2014 due to consolidation of “Fosbrasil”, in the amount of $36 million, a provision in respect of system-wide electricity costs in Israel, relating to prior periods (June 2013 to December 2014), in the amount of $20 million, and an update of the provision for removal of historical waste in ICL Industrial Products, in the amount of $20 million.


Financing expenses, net

The net financing expenses in the year ended on December 31, 2015 amounted to $108 million, compared with net financing expenses of $157 million in 2014 – a decrease of $49 million. The decline in the financing expenses compared with the previous year stems mainly from a decrease, in the amount of about $80 million, in the expense in respect of change in the fair value of foreign-currency hedging transactions, energy and marine transportation, as well as revaluation of short-term financial liabilities. In addition, there was a decrease in the interest expenses in respect of provisions for employee benefits, in the amount of about $4 million, and an increase of about $6 million in the capitalization of credit costs. On the other hand, there was a decline, in the amount of about $39 million, income from exchange rate differences in respect of provisions for employee benefits, compared with expenses last year as a result of the2018, devaluation of the shekel against the dollar of approximately 0.3%, compared with a devaluation of about 12% in 2014.

Tax expenses

The tax expenses induring the year ended on December 31, 2015 amounted to $162 million, compared withand a decrease in tax expenses of $166 millionprovisions in 2014. The tax rate in 2015 was favorably impacted by adjustment of the deferred taxes in ICL Rotem to the tax rates in accordance with the Law for Encouragement of Capital Investments, in the amount of about $18 million, which was offset by tax expenses stemming from the write off of a tax asset in respect of carryforward tax losses in Magnesium, in the amount of about $19 million. In addition, the effective tax rate was favorably impacted by recognition of deferred taxes at high tax rates in respect of losses recognized in connection with the bromine activities in Israel and in the United States, and tax expenses at a rate lower than 26% relating to sale of the Company's non-core businesses outside of Israel. The tax rate in 2014 was impacted by tax expenses, in the amount of about $62 million, mainly due to assessments agreements of subsidiaries in Europe and the change in the dollar/shekel exchange rate that triggered an increase in the tax rate of the companies operating in Israel the source of which is differences in the measurement bases.

147

Segment Information

Segment revenues, expenses and results include inter-segment transfers, which are priced mainly based on transaction prices in the ordinary course of business.business – this being based on reports that are regularly reviewed by the chief operating decision maker. These transfers are eliminated as part of consolidation of the financial statements.
The segment incomeprofit is measured based on the operating income, without certain expenses that are not allocated to the activityoperating segments including general and administrative expenses, as it is included in reports that are regularly reviewed by the chief operating decision maker.


Essential Minerals Segment

Results of Operations - Essential Minerals Segment

Sales

 20162015
 

$

millions

$

millions 

Potash & Magnesium1,3381,515
   Sales to external customers1,2131,384
   Sales to internal customers125131
Phosphate1,1631,064
   Sales to external customers966864
   Sales to internal customers197200
Setoffs

(64)

(79)

Total segment sales

2,437

2,500

Operating income

343

821

   

For additional details regarding Potash – see ‘Potash – Stand-Alone Activities'.

 Year Ended December 31,
 20162015
 

$

millions

$

millions 

Asia819752
Europe733842
South America395366
North America144168
Rest of the world346372
Total

2,437

2,500

   

Potash – Production and Sales

Thousands of Tonnes20162015
Production 5,2794,195
Sales to external customers 4,8184,181
Sales to internal customers

347

375 

Total sales (including internal sales) 5,1654,556
Closing inventory 666552
   

Production and Sales

The quantity of potash sold to external customers in the twelve months ended December 31, 2016 was 637 thousand tonnes higher than in the prior year, mainly due to an increase in the sales to Brazil and Europe and the strike that took place last year in ICL Dead Sea. Production of potash in the twelve months ended December 31, 2016 was 1,084 thousand tonnes higher than in the prior year, due to the strike at ICL Dead Sea and expansion of the processing capabilities at ICL Dead Sea (“Stage 11”), which was partly offset by a decrease in production at ICL UK.


Phosphate – Production and Sales

Thousands of Tonnes20162015
Phosphate rock  
Production of rock 5,7444,417
Sales * 1,0321,635
Phosphate rock used for internal purposes 4,0992,767
Fertilizers  
Production 2,7251,639
Sales * 2,6451,566
   
* To external customers.

Production and Sales

The quantity of fertilizers sold in the twelve months ended December 31, 2016 was 1,079 thousand tonnes higher than in the prior year, due to consolidation of the YPH joint venture in China. In the twelve months ended December 31, 2016, manufacture of phosphate fertilizers and the production of phosphate rock were higher by 1,086 thousand tonnes and 1,327 thousand tonnes, respectively, than in the prior year, mainly due to consolidation of the YPH joint venture in China and increased production in ICL Rotem in Israel.

Results of operations for the year 2016

Sales

A. Potash & Magnesium

2018 – Industrial products segment
 20182017
 $ millions$ millions
Total Sales 1,296 1,193
   Sales to external customers 1,281 1,179
   Sales to internal customers 15 14
Segment profit 350 303
Depreciation and Amortization 63 61
Capital expenditures 50 49

Below is a geographical breakdown of our sales to external customers, by customer location:
 Year Ended December 31,
 20182017
 $ millions$ millions
Europe 473 456
Asia 399 351
North America 347 327
South America 21 18
Rest of the world 41 27
Total 1,281 1,179


148

Sales analysisExpensesOperating income
$ millions 
Total sales 20151,515
Quantity205
Price(365)
Exchange rate

(17)

YTD 2017 figures 1,193 (890) 303 
Quantity 22 (19) 3 
Price 70- 70 
Exchange rate 11 (11)- 
Raw materials- (13) (13) 
Energy- (2) (2) 
Transportation- 1 1 
Operating and other expenses- (12) (12) 
YTD 2018 figures 1,296 (946) 350 


Total sales 2016

1,338

-
Quantity– the increasepositive impact on the segment’s profit derives mainly from potash sales, in light of the strike impact in 2015 (amounting to $341million).

-Price– the decrease stems mainly from the decline in potash selling prices.

-Exchange rate – the decrease stems mainly from the devaluation of the pound against the dollar.


B. Phosphate

Sales analysis$ millions
Total sales 20151,064
Quantity290
Price (185)
Exchange rate

(6)

Total sales 2016

1,163

-Quantity– the increase derives mainly from consolidation of the YPH joint venture and low SSP sales last year as a result of the fire in a fertilizer production facility in Israel.

-Price– the decrease stems mainly from the decline in phosphate fertilizers selling prices.

-Exchange rate – the decrease stems mainly from the devaluation of the Chinese yuan against the dollar.

Essential Minerals Segment

Operating income analysis$ millions
Total operating income 2015821
Quantity (40)
Price (540)
Exchange rate- 
Raw materials70 
Energy20 
Transportation (20)
Other

32

Total operating income 2016

343

-Quantity– the decrease stems mainly from potash sales (not including the increase stemming from last year's strike – which was adjusted), which was partly offset by a low SSP sales last year as a result of the fire in a fertilizer production facility in Israel. The gross profit of the YPH joint venture had only a minor effect.

-Price– the decrease stems mainly from the decline in potash and phosphate fertilizers selling prices.

-Raw materials – the increase stems mainly from a decline in the sulfur prices (used in green phosphoric acid production).

-Energy– the increase stems mainly from a decline in system-wide electricity costs and a decline in electricity, water and gas costs.

-Transportation– the decrease stems mainly from an increase in the quantities sold of bromine-based flame retardants, phosphorous‑based flame retardants and industrial solutions and magnesia products, partly offset by a decrease in the YPH joint venture.quantities sold of bromine-based industrial solutions.

-
OtherPrice– the increasepositive impact on the segment’s profit derives mainly from income from insurancean increase in respectthe selling prices of bromine-based industrial solutions and flame retardants, phosphorous-based flame retardants and magnesia products.
-
Exchange rate – the average upward revaluation of the fire in a fertilizereuro against the dollar which increased the Company's revenue was fully offset by the average upward revaluation of the euro and the shekel against the dollar which increased production facility in Israel, andcosts.
-
Raw materials –the negative impact on the segment’s profit derives mainly from a declinean increase in the salary costs due to implementationprices of efficiency plans (which was partly offset by a provision resultingraw materials used for bromine- and phosphorous-based flame retardants.
-
Operating and other expenses – the negative impact on the segment's profit derives mainly from extension of the validity of the employment agreement in ICL Dead Sea).inventory write-off and higher labor costs.

149

Results of operations for the year 2018 - Potash – Stand-Alone Activities

Key Figures – Additional Information

Millions of dollars20162015
Average potash selling price - FOB (in $) 211280
Sales to external customers 1,1341,292
Sales to internal customers * 151157
Operating income 291645
   

segment

 20182017
 $ millions$ millions
Total sales 1,623 1,383
   Potash sales to external customers 1,280 1,119
   Potash sales to internal customers 79 71
   Other and eliminations* 264 193
Gross profit 696 539
Segment profit 393 282
Depreciation and Amortization 141 128
Capital expenditures 356 270
Average realized price (in $)** 278 236

*Sales to other business lines of ICL including Magnesium business.

The potash stand-alone activities include, among others, Mainly includes Polysulphate produced in a mine in the UK, and salt produced in underground mines in UK and Spain.

Spain, magnesium-based products and sales of electricity produced in Israel.

** Potash average realized price (dollar per tonne) is calculated by dividing total potash revenue by total sales’ quantities. The difference between FOB price and average realized price is mainly marine transportation costs.
Below is a geographical breakdown of our sales to external customers, by customer location:
 Year Ended December 31,
 20182017
 $ millions$ millions
Asia 518 432
South America 406 347
Europe 396 327
North America 107 116
Rest of the world 54 36
Total 1,481 1,258



150

SalesExpensesOperating income
$ millions
YTD 2017 figures 1,383 (1,101) 282 
Quantity 21 (25) (4)
Price 197- 197
Exchange rate 22 (27) (5) 
Energy- (3) (3) 
Transportation- (32) (32) 
Operating and other expenses- (42) (42) 
YTD 2018 figures 1,623 (1,230) 393 


-
Quantity – the moderate negative impact on the segment’s profit derives mainly from a product and site mix, due to increased sales of lower margin products, including electricity surplus from the new power plant in Sodom and Polysulphate.
-
Price – the positive impact on the segment’s profit derives from the increase in potash selling prices.
-
Exchange rate – the negative impact on the segment’s profit derives mainly from the average upward revaluation of the euro against the dollar.
-
Transportation – the negative impact on the segment’s profit derives mainly from an increase in marine transportation prices.
-
Operating and other expenses – the negative impact on the segment’s profit derives mainly from a capital gain due to sale of an office building in Israel which was recorded last year, an increase in royalties, as a result of higher revenue, higher depreciation expenses, expenses recorded in connection with DSW's collective labor agreement and higher operational costs, mainly as a result of annual production record level of potash in Israel.

151

Potash – Production and Sales

Thousands of Tonnes20182017
Production 4,880 4,773
Total sales (including internal sales) 4,895 5,039
Closing inventory 385 400


-     Production – in 2018, production of potash was 107 thousand tonnes higher than in 2017, due to increased production (about 230 thousand tonnes) in ICL Dead Sea and ICL Iberia, despite the stoppage of the potash operation in ICL Boulby at the end of the second quarter of 2018, as part of the transition to the Polysulphate production. The increased production in ICL Dead Sea derived mainly from efficiency activity in planning, maintenance and operational excellence, which led to an annual production record level in ICL Dead Sea. The increased production in ICL Iberia derived mainly from an efficiency plan implemented at the beginning of 2018 and from higher ore grade in the mining area in the beginning of 2018.
-     Sales –  the quantity of potash sold in 2018, was 144 thousand tonnes lower than in 2017, mainly due to a decrease in potash sales to North and South America.
Results of operations for the year 2016

2018 – Phosphate Solutions segment
 20182017
 $ millions$ millions
Total Sales 2,099 2,037
   Sales to external customers 2,001 1,938
   Sales to internal customers 98 99
Segment profit 208 149
Depreciation and Amortization 172 172
Capital expenditures 180 154

Below is a geographical breakdown of our sales to external customers, by customer location:
 Year Ended December 31,
 20182017
 $ millions$ millions
Europe 696 730
Asia 465 457
North America 405 368
South America 264 274
Rest of the world 171 109
Total 2,001 1,938

152

Sales analysis$ millionsSales
Total sales 2015Expenses1,449
Quantity210
Price (355)
Exchange rate

(19)

Total sales 2016

1,285

Operating income
 
 
$ millions
 

Operating income analysis$ millions
Total operating Income 2015645
Quantity (65)
Price (355)
Exchange rate5
Raw materials and Energy5
Transportation20
Other

36

Total operating income 2016

291

YTD 2017 figures 2,037 (1,888) 149 
Divested businesses 2017 (32) 36 4 
YTD 2017 figures (excluding divested businesses) 2,005 (1,852) 153 
Quantity (108) 98 (10) 
Price 142- 142
Exchange rate 44 (33) 11 
Raw materials- (62) (62) 
Energy- 1 1
Transportation- (10) (10) 
Operating and other expenses- (14) (14) 
YTD 2018 figures (excluding divested businesses) 2,083 (1,872) 211 
Divested businesses 2018 16 (19) (3) 
YTD 2018 figures 2,099 (1,891) 208 


-
QuantityDivested businessessale of the decrease stems mainly from potash sales (not includingassets and business of Rovita at the increase stemming from last year’s strike, which was adjusted).beginning of the third quarter of 2018.

-
PriceQuantity– the decrease stems mainly from a decline in potash selling.

-Transportationnegative impact on the increase stems mainly from a decline in the quantities of potash sold.

-Other– the increase derives mainly from operational costs reduction due to implementation of efficiency plans.

Specialty Solutions Segment

Results of Operations – Specialty Solutions Segment

Sales

 20162015
 

$

millions

millions

Industrial Products953871
   Sales to external customers946859
   Sales to internal customers712
Specialty Fertilizers661680
   Sales to external customers632656
   Sales to internal customers2924
Advanced Additives966945
   Sales to external customers897858
   Sales to internal customers6987
Food Specialties659613
   Sales to external customers650602
   Sales to internal customers911
Setoffs

(91)

(112)

Total segment sales

3,148

2,997

Operating income

589

514

   

 Year Ended December 31,
 20162015
 

$

millions

$

millions

Europe1,1191,130
North America9821,007
Asia493359
South America201218
Rest of the world

353

283

Total

3,148

2,997

   

Sales

A. Industrial Products

Sales analysis$ millions
Total sales 2015871
Quantity90
Price (10)
Exchange rate

2

Total sales 2016

953


-Quantity– the increase derives mainly from bromine-based flame retardants in light of the strike impact in 2015 (amounting to $80 million), which was partly offset by a decrease in clear brine products.

-Price– the decrease stems mainly from a decline in the selling prices of phosphorus-based flame retardants.

B. Specialty Fertilizers

Sales analysis$ millions
Total sales 2015680
Quantity25
Price (40)
Exchange rate

(4)

Total sales 2016

661

-Quantity– the increase derives mainly from consolidation of the YPH joint venture.

-Price– the decrease stems mainly from lower commodity fertilizers prices which negatively impacted the selling prices.

-Exchange rate – the decrease stems mainly from devaluation of the pound against the dollar.

C. Advanced Additives

Sales analysis$ millions
Total sales 2015945
Quantity50
Price (25)
Exchange rate

(4)

Total sales 2016

966

-Quantity– the increase derives mainly from consolidation of the YPH joint venture (contributing to the increase in the acids sub-business line) and specialty minerals products in light of the strike impact in 2015 (amounting to $32 million), which was partly offset by a decrease in the quantities of specialty minerals sold in the fourth quarter.

-Price– the decrease stems mainly from a decline in the selling prices of acids and specialty minerals

-Exchange rate – the decrease stems mainly from devaluation of the pound against the dollar.


D. Food Specialties

Sales analysis$ millions
Total sales 2015613
Quantity45
Price10
Exchange rate

(9)

Total sales 2016

659

-Quantity– the increase derives mainly from dairy proteins and new products.

-Price– the increase derives mainly from an increase in selling prices of organic dairy proteins.

-Exchange rate – mainly as a result of devaluation of the Mexican peso and the pound against the dollar.

Specialty Solutions Segment

Operating income analysis$ millions
Total operating income 2015514
Quantity10
Price (60)
Exchange rate- 
Raw materials95 
Energy15 
Transportation5 
Other

10

 
Total operating income 2016

589

-Quantity– the increase stems mainly from higher sales of dairy proteins and new products in ICL Food Specialties and from bromine-based flame retardants in ICL Industrial Products.

-Price– the decrease stems mainly from lower commodity fertilizers prices which impacted the sales prices in ICL Specialty Fertilizers and acids in ICL Advanced Additives.

-Raw materials – the increase stems mainly from a decline in the sulfur prices, used in green phosphoric acid production in ICL Advanced Additives, from a decline in the price of commodity fertilizers used as raw materials in ICL Specialty Fertilizer’s products and raw materials used for manufacturing bromine-based and phosphorus-based products in ICL Industrial Products.

-Energy– the increasesegment’s profit derives mainly from a declinedecrease in the electricityphosphate-based acids and gas costs.

-Other– the increase stems from, among other things, a decline in the salary costs due to implementation of the efficiency plan in ICL Industrial Products.


Results of Operations - Essential Minerals Segment

Sales 

 20152014
 

$

millions

millions

Potash & Magnesium1,5151,902
   Sales to external customers1,3841,738
   Sales to internal customers131164
Phosphate1,064963
   Sales to external customers864776
   Sales to internal customers200187
Setoffs

(79)

(92)

Total segment sales

2,500

2,773

Operating income

821

720

   

For additional details regarding Potash – see ‘Potash – Stand-Alone Activities'.

 Year Ended December 31,
 20152014
 

$

millions

$

millions 

Asia752726
Europe842885
South America366430
North America168299
Rest of the world372433
Total

2,500

2,773

   

Potash – Production and Sales

Thousands of Tonnes20152014
Production 4,1955,143
Sales to external customers 4,1814,923
Sales to internal customers

375

432

Total sales (including internal sales) 4,5565,355
Closing inventory 552914
   

Production and Sales

The quantity of potash sold to external customers in the twelve months ended December 31, 2015 was 742 thousand tonnes lower than in the prior year, mainly due to a decrease in the quantities sold to the United States, India, Brazil and China. Production of potash in the year ended December 31, 2015 was approximately 948 thousand tonnes lower than in 2014, due to a decrease in the production in Israel as a result of the strike, which was partly offset by an increase in production at ICL UK.


Phosphate – Production and Sales

Thousands of Tonnes20152014
Phosphate rock  
Production of rock 4,4173,357
Sales * 1,635931
Phosphate rock used for internal purposes 2,7672,398
Fertilizers  
Production 1,6391,590
Sales * 1,5661,660
   
* To external customers.

Production and Sales

The quantity of fertilizers sold in the twelve months ended December 31, 2015 was 94 thousand tonnes lower than in the prior year, mainly due to a decrease in the sales in Brazil and Europe. Production of phosphate fertilizers, in the year ended December 31, 2015, was 49 thousand tonnes higher than in 2014 as a result of the first-time consolidation of YPH and net of the impact of the fire in the fertilizers production facility in Israel that took place in the second quarter of 2015. Production of phosphate rock, in the year ended December 31, 2015, was 1,060 thousand tonnes higher than in 2014, as a result of the first-time consolidation of YPH and an increase in production at the rock production facilities.

Results of operations for the year 2015

Sales

A. Potash & Magnesium

Sales analysis$ millions
Total sales 20141,902
Quantity (265)
Price (35)
Exchange rate

(87)

Total sales 2015

1,515

-Quantity– the decrease stems mainly from the strike impact (amounting to $341 million).

-Price– the decrease stems mainly of a decline in potash selling prices.

-Exchange rate – the decrease stems mainly from the devaluation of the euro against the dollar.


B. Phosphate

Sales analysis$ millions
Total sales 2014963
Quantity125
Price30
Exchange rate

(54)

Total sales 2015

1,064

-Quantity– the increase stems mainly from consolidation of the YPH joint venture and increase of phosphate rock quantities sold. The increase was partly offset by low SSP sales as a result of the fire in a fertilizer production facility In Israel.

-Price– the increase stems mainly of an increase infood additives, together with phosphate fertilizers selling prices.

-Exchange rate – the decrease stems mainly from the devaluation of the euro against the dollar.

Essential Minerals Segment

Operating income analysis$ millions
Total operating income 2014720
Quantity60
Price- 
Exchange rate25
Raw materials (10)
Energy10
Transportation15
Other

1

Total operating income 2015

821

-Quantity- the increase stems mainly from phosphate rock and potash sales (not including the decrease stemming from the strike - which was adjusted), and from consolidation of the YPH joint venture.

-Exchange rate - the increase stems mainly from devaluation of the euro against the dollar.

-Raw material - the decrease stems mainly from an increase in sulfur prices (used in the green phosphoric acid production).

-Energy- the increase stems mainly from a decline in the energy costs in Israel, partly offset by an increase in system-wide electricity costs.

-Transportation- the increase stems mainly as a result of decline in the transportation pricesquantities sold, which was partly offset by an increase in dairy proteins quantities sold.
-
Price – the segment benefited from a positive price impact throughout most of the phosphate chain. The increase derives mainly from selling prices of phosphate fertilizers, together with phosphate-based acids, food additives and salts (mainly as part of value-focused strategy).
-
Exchange rate – the positive impact on the segment’s profit derives mainly from the average upward revaluation of the euro against the dollar increasing revenues. This increase was partly offset by the average upward revaluation of the euro and the Chinese yuan against the dollar increasing production costs.
-
Raw materials – the negative impact on the segment’s profit derives mainly from higher sulphur prices which increased the costs of the main raw materials throughout the phosphate value chain.
-
Transportation – the negative impact on the segment’s profit derives mainly from an increase in marine transportation prices.
-
Operating and other expenses – the negative impact on the segment’s profit derives mainly from an insurance income in Israel which was recorded last year and inventory write-off, partly offset by lower operational costs as a result of implementation of efficiency measures and an environment-related provision which was recorded last year.

153

Phosphate Solutions: Backward Integrated Value Chain
Thousands of tonnes20182017
Phosphate rock  
Production 5,006 4,877
Green phosphoric acid  
Used for production of phosphate commodities 552 451
Used for production of phosphate specialties 305 281
Other 17 28
Phosphate fertilizers  
Production 2,304 2,094
Sales* 2,269 2,291
Pure phosphoric acid  
Production 289 275


* To external customers.
-     Production of phosphate rock – in 2018, production of phosphate rock was higher by 129 thousand tonnes than in 2017, mainly due to shutdown at ICL Rotem Zin plant during the second half of 2017 as a result of adjusting production volumes to the business environment.
-     Green phosphoric acid – in 2018, green phosphoric acid used for production of phosphate commodities was higher by 101 thousand tonnes than in 2017, mainly due to increased production of phosphate fertilizers in YPH joint venture. Green phosphoric acid used for production of phosphate specialties in 2018, was higher by 24 thousand tonnes than in 2017, mainly due to the segment's strategy for increasing production of phosphate-based specialty products.
-     Production of phosphate fertilizers – in 2018, production of phosphate fertilizers was higher by 210 thousand tonnes than in 2017, mainly due to increased production of phosphate fertilizers in YPH joint venture.
-     Sales of phosphate fertilizers – the quantity of phosphate fertilizers sold in 2018 was 22 thousand tonnes lower than in 2017, as an increase in the sales of the YPH JV was more than offset by lower demand towards the end of 2018.
-     Production of pure phosphoric acid – in 2018, production of pure phosphoric acid was higher by 14 thousand tonnes than in 2017, mainly due to reduced production at ICL Rotem in 2017 that was unfavorably affected by a shortage of 4D acid, as well as due to higher demand in China.
154

Results of operations for the year 2018 – Innovative Ag Solutions segment
 20182017
 $ millions$ millions
Total Sales 741 692
   Sales to external customers 719 671
   Sales to internal customers 22 21
Segment profit 57 56
Depreciation and Amortization 19 19
Capital expenditures 15 12

Below is a geographical breakdown of our sales to external customers, by customer location:
 Year Ended December 31,
 20182017
 $ millions$ millions
Europe 359 324
Asia 105 99
North America 97 87
South America 21 22
Rest of the world 137 139
Total 719 671


155

SalesExpensesOperating income
$ millions
YTD 2017 figures 692 (636) 56 
Quantity 17 (13) 4
Price 13- 13
Exchange rate 19 (17) 2 
Raw materials- (14) (14) 
Energy--- 
Transportation--- 
Operating and other expenses- (4) (4) 
YTD 2018 figures 741 (684) 57 


-
Quantity – the positive impact on the segment's profit derives mainly from specialty agriculture products, largely from liquid NPK, straight fertilizers and water-soluble NPK.
-
Price – the positive impact on the segment's profit derives mainly from an increase in the selling prices of straight fertilizers.
-
Exchange rate – the positive impact on the segment's profit derived mainly from the average upward revaluation of the euro against the dollar which increased revenue more than it contributed to the increase in production costs.
-
Raw materials – the negative impact on the segment's profit derives mainly from an increase in most of the segment's raw materials, mainly ammonia and caustic soda.

156

Year Ended December 31, 2017 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2016
Set forth below are our results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016.
 For the Years Ended December 31,
%
Increase
(Decrease)
 20172016
 $ millions$ millionssales
Sales 5,418 5,3631%
Cost of sales 3,746 3,7031%
    
Gross profit 1,672 1,6601%
    
Selling, transport and marketing expenses 746 7223%
General and administrative expenses 261 321(19)%
Research and development expenses 55 73(25)%
Other expenses 90 618(85)%
Other income (109) (71)54%
    
Operating income (loss) 629 (3)-
    
Finance expenses, net 124 132(6)%
    
Share in earnings of equity-accounted investees- 18-
Income (loss) before income taxes 505 (117)-
    
Provision for income taxes 158 55187%
Net income (loss) 347 (172)-
Net income (loss) attributable to the shareholders of the Company 364 (122)-
    
Earnings (losses) per share attributable to the shareholders of the Company:   
    
Basic earnings (losses) per share (in dollars) 0.29 (0.10)-
    
Diluted earnings (losses) per share (in dollars) 0.29 (0.10)-

157

Results of operations for the year 2017
SalesExpensesOperating income
$ millions
YTD 2016 figures 5,363 (5,366) (3) 
Total adjustments YTD 2016*- 585 585 
Adjusted YTD 2016 figures 5,363 (4,781) 582 
Quantity 52 (1) 51 
Price (6)- (6) 
Exchange rate 9 (56) (47) 
Raw materials- 25 25 
Energy- (21) (21) 
Transportation- (12) (12) 
Operating and other expenses- 80 80 
Adjusted YTD 2017 figures 5,418 (4,766) 652 
Total adjustments YTD 2017*- (23) (23) 
YTD 2017 figures 5,418 (4,789) 629 

* See "Adjustments to reported operating and net income (Non-GAAP)" above.
-
Sales – the company sales increased by $55 million compared to 2016. The quantity‑related increase derives mainly from an increase in the quantities sold.sold of fire safety products (which were divested at the end of the first quarter of 2018), phosphate acids, bromine-based industrial solutions (mainly clear brine fluids), bromine‑based flame retardants and specialty agriculture products. The increase was partly offset by a decline in the quantities sold of phosphate rock, phosphate fertilizers and dairy proteins.
The price-related decrease derives mainly from a decline in the selling prices of phosphate fertilizers, phosphate acids, and specialty agriculture products. This decrease was partly offset by an increase in potash, phosphorous-based flame retardants and bromine-based industrial solutions selling prices.
The exchange rate increase derives mainly from the upward revaluation of the euro against the dollar.
-
Cost of sales – the cost of sales increased by $43 million compared to 2016. The increase derives mainly from the upward revaluation of the shekel against the dollar increasing production costs (see ‘Exchange rate’ above), higher energy prices in Israel, higher electricity costs in Europe (see ‘Energy’ above), inventory write-offs in ICL Potash, mainly in Europe and an increase in royalties paid due to higher revenues (see ‘Other’ above). The increase was partly offset by a decline in raw materials prices, mainly commodity fertilizer prices used in the specialty fertilizers business and sulphur prices used mainly in the phosphate value chain (see ‘Raw materials’ above).
-
Selling and marketing – selling and marketing expenses increased by $24 million compared to 2016. The increase derives mainly from an increase in marine transportation prices and exchange rate fluctuations, partly offset by a decrease in quantities sold of products of the Phosphate commodities business (see ‘Transportation’ and ‘Exchange rate’ above).
158

-
General and administrative – general and administrative expenses decreased by $60 million compared to 2016. The decrease derives mainly from cost-saving measures and a reduction of professional services throughout the Company (see ‘Operating and other expenses’ above).
-
Other expenses, net - other expenses, net, decreased by $566 million compared to 2016. The decrease derives mainly from capital gains recorded this year related to divestiture of businesses (mainly IDE), together with non-operational expenses in the corresponding period last year, mainly from impairment of assets related to the Harmonization Project and to discontinuance of the activities of Allana Affar in Ethiopia (see ‘Adjustments to reported operating and net income – Non-GAAP financial measures’ above).
Below is a geographical breakdown of our sales according to customer location:
 Year Ended December 31,
 20172016
 $ millions$ millions
Europe 1,918 1,863
Asia 1,342 1,275
North America 1,175 1,141
South America 666 588
Rest of the world 317 496
Total 5,418 5,363

Europe the increase derives mainly from an increase in the quantities sold of dairy protein products, phosphate fertilizers, clear brine fluids and specialty agriculture products. The increase was partly offset by a decrease in the quantities sold of potash and phosphate rock.
Asia – the increase derives mainly from an increase in the quantities sold of phosphoric acid, potash, bromine-based flame retardants, bromine-based industrial solutions, acids, specialty agriculture products and dairy protein products. This increase was partly offset by a decrease in the quantities sold of phosphate fertilizers and phosphate rock.
North America – the increase derives mainly from an increase in the quantities sold and selling prices of potash together with an increase in fire-safety and P2S5 product quantities sold. This increase was partly offset by a decrease in the quantities sold of the Innovative Ag Solutions segment products and food phosphates and multi‑ingredient blends.
South America – the increase derives mainly from an increase in potash selling prices and quantities sold.
Rest of the world – the decrease derives mainly from a decrease in the quantities of dairy protein products sold and a decline in potash sales to an Israeli customer (Haifa Chemicals) facing operational difficulties due to new local regulation. The decrease was partly offset by an increase in the quantities sold of specialty agriculture products.
159

Financing expenses, net
The net financing expenses in the year ended December 31, 2017 amounted to $124 million, compared with $132 million last year – a decrease of $8 million. The decrease derives mainly from interest expenses recorded last year in the amount of $38 million in connection with interest on past royalties following an arbitration decision between the government of Israel and the Company, as well as interest on a tax assessment agreement signed with the Israel Tax Authority relating to prior periods and an increase in 2017 of income of about $10 million in respect of hedging transactions, net of exchange rate differences. On the other hand, in 2017 we recognized finance expenses as a result of revaluation of liabilities for employee benefits (in shekel terms) of about $20 million, fees paid with respect to early repayment of a long-term loan of about $13 million and interest expenses, mainly from an increase of the average interest rate on the Company’s debt of about $7 million.
Tax expenses
The tax expenses in 2017 amounted to $158 million reflecting an effective tax rate of about 31%. In 2016 and 2015 tax expenses were $55 million and $162 million reflecting about (47%) and about 24% effective tax rate, respectively. The increase in the effective tax rate in 2017 compared with prior years is mainly due to reduction of the tax benefits under the Israeli Encouragement Law as well as the mix of profits generated in various jurisdictions.
Tax expenses in 2017 were impacted by tax expenses following an internal transaction in preparation of divestitures of low synergy businesses together with an upward revaluation of the shekel against dollar that increased the tax expenses in the Israeli subsidiaries, and was offset by tax income as a result of the resolution given by the Appeals Court in Belgium with respect to an appeal filed by the Company regarding allowance of deduction of certain expenses and tax income due to an adjustment to the deferred taxes following the tax reform in the US.
In 2016, the effective tax rate was impacted mainly by the loss from discontinuance of the global ERP project (Harmonization Project) and by the capital loss from discontinuance of the activities of Allana Afar in Ethiopia.
160

Results of operations for the year 2017 – for Industrial Products segment
 20172016
 $ millions$ millions
Total Sales 1,193 1,120
   Sales to external customers 1,179 1,111
   Sales to internal customers 14 9
Segment profit 303 286
Depreciation and Amortization 61 52
Capital expenditures 49 38

Below is a geographical breakdown of our sales to external customers, by customer location:
 Year Ended December 31,
 20172016
 $ millions$ millions
Europe 456 424
Asia 351 301
North America 327 330
South America 18 24
Rest of the world 27 32
Total 1,179 1,111



161

SalesExpensesOperating income
$ millions
YTD 2016 figures 1,120 (834) 286 
Quantity 57 (21) 36 
Price 12- 12 
Exchange rate 4 (16) (12) 
Raw materials  (1) (1) 
Energy  (2) (2) 
Transportation  (1) (1) 
Operating and other expenses  (15) (15)   
YTD 2017 figures 1,193 (890) 303 

-
Quantity – the positive impact on the segment's profit derives mainly from an increase in the quantities sold of bromine-based flame retardants and bromine-based industrial solutions (mainly clear brine fluids).
-
Price – the positive impact on the sales and on the segment's profit derives mainly from an increase in the selling prices of phosphorous-based flame retardants and bromine-based industrial solutions.
-
Exchange rate – the negative impact on the segment's profit derives mainly from the upward revaluation of the shekel against the dollar increasing production costs, partly offset by the upward revaluation of the euro against the dollar increasing revenues.
-
Operating and other expenses - the negative impact on the segment's profit derives mainly from an increase in the royalties as a result of the increase in sales and from expenses recorded in relation with an extension of work agreement.
162
Results of operations for the year 2017 – Potash – Stand-Alone Activities

Key Figures – Additional Information

Millions of dollars20152014
Average potash selling price - FOB (in $) 280293
Sales to external customers 1,2921,620
Sales to internal customers * 157196
Operating income 645607
   

segment

 20172016
 $ millions$ millions
Total sales 1,383 1,338
   Potash sales to external customers 1,119 1,085
   Potash sales to internal customers 71 80
   Other and eliminations* 193 173
Gross profit 539 499
Segment profit 282 282
Depreciation and Amortization 128 127
Capital expenditures 270 311
Average realized price (in $)** 236 226

*Sales to other business lines of ICL including Magnesium business.

The potash stand-alone activities include, among others, Mainly includes Polysulphate produced in a mine in the UK, and salt produced in underground mines in UK and Spain.

Spain, magnesium-based products and sales of electricity produced in Israel.

** Potash average realized price (dollar per tonne) is calculated by dividing total potash revenue by total sales’ quantities. The difference between FOB price and average realized price is mainly marine transportation costs.
Below is a geographical breakdown of our sales to external customers, by customer location:
 Year Ended December 31,
 20172016
 $ millions$ millions
Asia 432 395
South America 347 267
Europe 327 354
North America 116 93
Rest of the world 36 104
Total 1,258 1,213



163

SalesExpensesOperating income
$ millions
YTD 2016 figures 1,338 (1,056) 282 
Quantity 1 9 10 
Price 41- 41 
Exchange rate 3 (14) (11) 
Energy  (11) (11) 
Transportation  (28) (28) 
Operating and other expenses  (1) (1) 
YTD 2017 figures 1,383 (1,101) 282 

-       Quantity - the positive impact on the segment's profit derives mainly from lower sales of potash manufactured at sites having lower profitability rates.
-       Price – the positive impact on the sales and on the segment's profit derives from an increase in potash selling prices (a $10 increase in the average realized price per tonne compared to last year).
-       Exchange rate – the negative impact on the segment’s profit derives mainly from the upward revaluation of the shekel and the euro against the dollar increasing production costs. This decrease was partly offset by the upward revaluation of the euro against the dollar increasing revenues.
-       Energy –  the negative impact on the segment’s profit derives mainly from higher energy prices in Israel and higher electricity charges in Europe.
-       Transportation – the negative impact on the segment’s profit derives mainly from an increase in marine transportation prices.
-
Operating and other expenses - the negative impact on the segment’s profit derives mainly from an increase in inventory write-offs (mainly in Europe) and an increase in royalties and sales commissions. This negative impact was partly offset by expenses recorded last year in connection with DSW's collective labor agreement and a capital gain due to sale of an office building in Israel.
164

Potash – Production and Sales
Thousands of Tonnes20172016
Production 4,773 5,279
Total sales (including internal sales) 5,039 5,165
Closing inventory 400 666


-     Production – production of potash in 2017, was 506 thousand tonnes lower than in 2016, mainly due to decreased production at ICL Boulby as a result of the transition from extracting and producing potash to producing Polysulphate™. The lower production in the first quarter of 2017, caused by an operational breakdown in the mine tailings channel, was renewed during the second quarter of 2017 and the overall production level was recovered during the course of the year. In addition, decreased production was recorded in Spain as a result of lower ore grade in the current mining area and in ICL Dead Sea as a result of maintenance operations at the plant in Sodom.
-     Sales –  the quantity of potash sold in 2017, was 126 thousand tonnes lower than in 2016, mainly due to a decrease in sales to Israel and Europe, which was partially offset by an increase in sales to South America and Asia.
Results of operations for the year 2015

2017 – Phosphate Solutions segment
 20172016
 $ millions$ millions
Total Sales 2,037 2,186
   Sales to external customers 1,938 2,082
   Sales to internal customers 99 104
Segment profit 149 224
Depreciation and Amortization 172 203
Capital expenditures 154 237

Below is a geographical breakdown of our sales to external customers, by customer location:
 Year Ended December 31,
 20172016
 $ millions$ millions
Europe 730 697
Asia 457 501
North America 368 379
South America 274 276
Rest of the world 109 229
Total 1,938 2,082


165

Sales analysisExpensesOperating income
$ millions 
YTD 2016 figures 2,186 (1,962) 224 
Quantity (109) 73 (36)
Price (46)- (46) 
Exchange rate 6 (33) (27) 
Raw materials  15 15 
Energy  (8) (8) 
Transportation  16 16
Operating and other expenses  11 11 
YTD 2017 figures 2,037 (1,888) 149 

-       Quantity -  the negative impact on the segment's profit derives mainly from a decrease in phosphate fertilizers, phospahte rock and dairy proteins quantities sold. This negative impact was partly offset by an increase in phosphate-based acids quantities sold.
-       Price – the negative impact on the sales and on the segment's profit derives mainly from a decrease in the selling prices of phosphate fertilizers and phosphate-based acids.
-       Exchange rate – the negative impact on the segment’s profit derives mainly from the upward revaluation of the shekel and the euro against the dollar increasing production costs. This decrease was partly offset by the upward revaluation of the euro against the dollar increasing revenues.
-       Raw materials – the positive impact on the segment's profit derives mainly from a decrease in sulphur prices.
-       Energy –  the negative impact on the segment’s profit derives mainly from higher energy prices in Israel.
-       Transportation – the positive impact on the segment’s profit derives mainly from a decrease in quantities sold, partly offset by an increase in marine transportation prices.
Total sales 20141,816-
Operating and other expenses - the positive impact on the segment’s profit derives mainly from a decrease in depreciation expenses due to lower production (lower stripping costs), a decrease in royalties paid and an insurance income in Israel, partly offset by an environment related provision.
166

Phosphate Solutions: Backward Integrated Value Chain

Thousands of tonnes20172016
Phosphate rock  
Production4,8775,744
Green phosphoric acid  
Used for production of phosphate commodities451645
Used for production of phosphate specialties281261
Other2828
Phosphate fertilizers  
Production2,094 2,725
Sales*2,291 2,645
Pure phosphoric acid  
Production275266


* To external customers.
-     Production of phosphate rock – in 2017, production of phosphate rock was lower by 867 thousand tonnes than in 2016, mainly due to adjusting production volumes to the business environment at ICL Rotem, which included a shutdown of the Zin plant during part of the third and the fourth quarters of 2017. The plant returned to activity towards the end of the fourth quarter. In addition, the production of phosphate rock decreased due to a production optimization process in YPH.
-     Green phosphoric acid – in 2017, green phosphoric acid used for production of phosphate commodities was lower by 194 thousand tonnes than in 2016, mainly due to decreased production of phosphate fertilizers in YPH. Green phosphoric acid used for production of phosphate specialties in 2017, was higher by 20 thousand tonnes than in 2016, mainly due the shift to specialty products in YPH.
-     Production of phosphate fertilizers – in 2017, production of phosphate fertilizers was lower by 631 thousand tonnes than in 2016, mainly due to decreased production in YPH as a result of the shift to specialty products.
-     Salesof phosphate fertilizers – the quantity of phosphate fertilizers sold in 2017 was 354 thousand tonnes lower than in 2016, mainly due to a decrease in sales to Asia.
-     Production of pure phosphoric acid – in 2017, production of pure phosphoric acid was higher by 9 thousand tonnes than in 2016, mainly due to continuously growing demand in China.
167

Results of operations for the year 2017 – Innovative Ag Solutions segment
 20172016
 $ millions$ millions
Total Sales 692 661
   Sales to external customers 671 632
   Sales to internal customers 21 29
Segment profit 56 55
Depreciation and Amortization 19 17
Capital expenditures 12 7

Below is a geographical breakdown of our sales to external customers, by customer location:
 Year Ended December 31,
 20172016
 $ millions$ millions
Europe 324 314
Asia 99 72
North America 87 100
South America 22 19
Rest of the world 139 127
Total 671 632

 
QuantitySales (245)Expenses 
Price (35) 
Exchange rate

(87)

Total sales 2015

1,449

Operating income
 
 
$ millions
 

Operating income analysis$ millions
Total operating income 2014607
Quantity45 
Price (35) 
Exchange rate5 
Raw materials and Energy(5) 
Transportation10 
Other

18

Total operating income 2015

645

-Quantity- the increase stems from potash sales (not including the decrease stemming from the strike - which was adjusted).

YTD 2016 figures 661 (606) 55 
Quantity 46 (39) 7
Price (12)- (12)
Exchange rate (3) 1 (2) 
Raw materials  12 12
Energy -- 
Transportation -- 
Operating and other expenses  (4) (4) 
YTD 2017 figures 692 (636) 56 


-Price- the decrease stems mainly from the decline in potash selling prices.

-Transportation- the increase stems mainly as a result of decline in the transportation prices, which was partly offset by an increase in the quantities sold.

-Other - the increase derives mainly from a decline in the maintenance expenses and a decline in the number of employees, partly offset by an acceleration of the depreciation of the facilities of ICL UK as a result of an update of the potash reserves.

Results

-     Quantity – the positive impact on the segment's profit derives mainly from an increase in the quantities sold of Operationsspecialty agriculture products.
-     PriceSpecialty Solutions Segment

Sales

 20152014
 

$

millions

$

millions 

Industrial Products8711,025
   Sales to external customers8591,013
   Sales to internal customers1212
Specialty Fertilizers680754
   Sales to external customers656734
   Sales to internal customers2420
Advanced Additives945881
   Sales to external customers858803
   Sales to internal customers8778
Food Specialties613526
   Sales to external customers602514
   Sales to internal customers1112
Setoffs

(112)

(100)

Total segment sales

2,997

3,086

Operating income

514

505

   

 Year Ended December 31,
 20152014
 

$

millions

$

millions

Europe1,1301,209
North America1,007996
Asia359474
South America218133
Rest of the world

283

275

Total

2,997

3,086

   

the negative impact on the sales and on the segment's profit derives mainly from a decrease in the selling prices of specialty agriculture products.

Sales

A. Industrial Products

Sales analysis$ millions
Total sales 20141,025
Quantity (135)
Price15
Exchange rate

(34)

-     Raw materials – the positive impact on the segment's profit derives mainly from a decline in commodity fertilizers prices.
-    Operating and other expenses – the negative impact on the segment's profit derives mainly from an increase in sales commissions paid, due to higher revenue.
168

Total sales 2015

871

-Quantity - the decrease stems mainly from the strike impact (amounting to $80 million) and a decline in bromine-based and phosphorous-based flame retardants quantities sold.

-Price– the increase stems mainly from bromine-based flame retardants and elemental bromine selling prices.

-Exchange rate - the decrease stems mainly from the devaluation of the euro against the dollar.

B. Specialty Fertilizers

Sales analysis$ millions
Total sales 2014754
Quantity (20)
Price15
Exchange rate

(69)

Total sales 2015

680

-Quantity- the decrease stems mainly from a decline in straight soluble and traded fertilizers quantities sold.

-Price– the increase stems mainly from higher commodity fertilizers prices which positively impacted the selling prices.

-Exchange rate – the decrease stems mainly from the devaluation of the euro against the dollar.

C. Advanced Additives

Sales analysis$ millions
Total sales 2014881
Quantity105
Price5
Exchange rate

(46)

Total sales 2015

945

-Quantity– the increase derives mainly from the consolidation of YPH joint venture and an increase in the fire safety products. This increase was partly offset by the strike impact (amounting to $32 million).

-Price– the increase stems mainly from the increase in fire safety products selling prices.

-Exchange rate – the decrease stems mainly from the devaluation of the euro against the dollar.


D. Food Specialties

Sales analysis$ millions
Total sales 2014526
Quantity130
Price- 
Exchange rate

(43)

Total sales 2015

613

-Quantity -the increase stems mainly from the purchase of Prolactal and Rovita.

-Exchange rate – the decrease stems mainly from the devaluation of the euro against the dollar.

Specialty Solutions Segment

Operating income analysis$ millions
Total operating income 2014505
Quantity20 
Price35 
Exchange rate (30) 
Raw materials-
Energy-
Transportation-
Other

(16)

Total operating income 2015

514

-Quantity -the increase stems mainly from the purchase of Proloctal and Rovita.

-Price– the increase stems mainly from higher commodity fertilizers prices which impacted selling prices in ICL Specialty Fertilizers and an increase in bromine-based flame retardants and elemental bromine selling prices in ICL Industrial Products.

-Exchange rate – the decrease stems mainly from the devaluation of the euro against the dollar.

B. LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES


Overview

As at December 31, 2016,2018, ICL had a balance of $116$213 million in cash, cash equivalents,
short-term investments and deposits. As at December 31, 2016,2018, the Company's net financial liabilities were $3,268$2,212 million, including $2,796$1,815 million of long-termlong‑term debt (excluding current maturities) and debentures, and $588$610 million of short-termshort‑term debt (including current maturities of long-termlong‑term debt).

The Company's policy is to secure sources of financing for its operating activities and investments, while diversifying the sources of financing among various financial instruments, and between local and international financing entities. The Company's sources of financing are short and long-termlong‑term loans from banks (mainly international banks) and institutional entities in Israel, debentures issued to institutional investors in Israel and the United States, and securitization of customer receivables whereby some of our subsidiaries sell their customer receivables in return for a cash payment.receivables. The Company's policy is to fully utilize the various financing facilities according to our cash flow requirements, alternative costs and market conditions.

ICL's management believes that its sources of liquidity and capital resources, including working capital, are adequate for its current requirements and business operations and should be adequate to satisfy its anticipated working-capitalworking‑capital requirements during the next twelve months, along with its capital expenditures and other current corporate needs.

Distributions of dividends to ICL from its subsidiaries and transfers of funds through certain countries may under certain circumstances result in the creation of tax liabilities. However, taxation on dividend distributions and funds transfers have not had and are not expected to have a material impact on the Company's ability to meet its cash obligations.

In addition to the Company’sits operating expenses and its debt repayments, capital expenses and dividend distributions, in January 2016,2018 the Company completed acquisitioncontinued several major capital expenditure projects, such as the salt harvesting project, raising the coastal dykes in the evaporation ponds, investment in the new power station in Sodom, construction of 15%a new pumping station in the Northern Basin of the shareDead Sea and construction of phosphogypsum ponds in ICL Rotem. Additional major capital of YTH (this acquisition being one ofexpenditures scheduled to run over the conditions for closing ofcoming years are investments in the YPH transaction), after it was approved by the Chinese Ministry of Commerce and the Chinese Securities Authority,joint venture in exchange for a consideration of about $250 million. The Company expects to make non-recurring paymentsChina along with further investment in 2017, as a result of decisions of arbitrators issued between September 2016 and January 2017, regarding a dispute with the State of Israel concerning the amount of the royalties the Company is required to pay under the concession agreement for utilization of resources from the Dead Sea. As a result of the above mentioned decisions, the Company expects to pay about $60 million in addition to the amounts it has already paid. Furthermore, in December 2013, a tax assessment was received from the Israeli Taxes Authority whereby the Company is required to pay additional tax beyond the amount it paid in respect of the 2009 – 2011 tax years, in the amount of about $235 million. The Company appealed the Taxes Authority’s assessment, however, on December 8, 2016, it withdrew the appeal and agreed with the Taxes Authority to close out the tax assessment relating to the said tax years and also to conclude the main dispute with respect toSpain. On the other open tax years, in exchange for payment of an additional amount, beyond the amounts it has already paid, of about $60 million, including interest and linkage differences. Ashand, as part of its strategy of divesting its non-corelow synergy businesses, in December 2017, the Company completed sale of its holdings in IDE Technologies Ltd., for net proceeds of $168 million. In addition, on March 2018, the Company completed the sale transaction of the Fire Safety and Oil Additives businesses, for a total consideration of $1,010 million, of which $953 million is examiningin cash and $57 is in the possibilityform of sellinga long-term loan to a subsidiary of the buyer. For additional information on divestitures currently in progress, see “Item 3 - Key Information— A. Selected Financial Data”.
169

On May 29, 2018, the Company completed a cash tender offer for any and all its investmentsdebentures Series D, senior notes due in I.D.E.2024 with a coupon of 4.5%. Following the tender offer, the Company repurchased an amount of $616 million out of the original principal of $800 million. On October 31, 2018, ICL's Board of Directors authorized the Company to repurchase from time to time up to an additional $80 million of the Company's series D debentures due in 2024, which following the completion of the tender offer for the series D debentures on May 29, 2018, amount to $184 million, pursuant for one or more privately negotiated transactions, at a price which shall not exceed the market price of each such repurchase.
On May 31, 2018, the Company completed a private offering of senior unsecured notes (hereinafter – Series F Debentures) to institutional investors pursuant to Rule 144A and Novotide.

Regulation S under the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended, in a total amount of $600 million, due in 2038. The Series F Debentures carry an annual coupon of 6.375%, to be paid in semiannual installments on May 31 and November 30 of each year, commencing November 30, 2018 and until the repayment date. The Series F Debentures have been rated BBB- by S&P Global Inc. and Fitch Rating Inc. with a stable rating outlook.

On March 11, 2016, Fitch Ratings Services revised itsMay 10, 2018 and on June 21, 2018, respectively, the credit rating agency S&P ratified the Company’s international credit rating, BBB- with a stable rating outlook, of the Company’sand credit which is rated BBB (together with the rating of the debentures), from stable to negative.

On October 27, 2016, the Standard & Poor’s rating company updatedagency S&P Ma’alot ratified the Company’s credit rating, (together with the rating of the debentures) from BBB to BBB–,‘ilAA’ with a stable rating outlook.

On October 29, 2018, the Company entered into an agreement according to which, its commitment under certain revolving credit facility agreements were reduced by a total aggregate amount of $655 million, to an amount of $1.2 billion (hereinafter – the agreement). In accordance with the agreement, the maturity date of the $1.2 billion revolving credit facility has been extended from March 2022 to March 2023, with two options for an extension (at the banks’ option) of an additional one year each, so that the final maturity date, if all options are consummated, will be March 2025. All the other material original terms of the revolving credit facility agreements were maintained. The Company’s local credit ratingagreement entered into effect in Israel, as rated by Standard & Poor’s Maalot, remained unchanged, namely, ilAA with a stable rating outlook.

November 2018.

Sources and Uses of Cash

The following table sets forth our cash flows for the periods indicated:

 Year Ended December 31,
 201620152014
 $ millions$ millions$ millions
Net cash provided by operating activities966573893
Net cash used in investing activities(800)(547)(996)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing  activities(239)1570
    

 Year Ended December 31,
 201820172016
 $ millions$ millions$ millions
Net cash provided by operating activities 620 847 966
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities 331 (333) (800)
Net cash used in financing activities (894) (511) (239)


170

Operating Activities

The cash flows fromprovided by operating activities are a significant source of liquidity for the Company. In 2016,2018, the cash flows from operating activities amounted to $966$620 million, compared with $573$847 million last year. MostThis decrease derives mainly from an increase in payments of royalties partly as a result of arbitration decision received at the end of 2018 and cash paid from losses in derivative transactions in the current year along with an increase in working capital in the current year compared with a decrease in the last year. This decrease was partly offset by return of advanced tax payment at the beginning of 2018 in the amount of $ 40 million.
In 2017, the cash flows from operating activities stemsamounted to $847 million, compared with $966 million in 2016. This decrease derives mainly from the decline in the working capital, mainly as a result of a decrease in the receivables from the potash customers due to a reduction in the credit days allowed to customers in India and Brazil, as well as from the high balance of receivables in the prior year deriving from an increase in the sales as a result of high potash sales at the end of the year following a weak first half, and employee severance payments made last year. On the other hand, there was an increase in payments of taxes along with higher cash payments made due to retirement of employees in 2017 as well as a lower reduction in the working capital, mainly from an increase in sales in Industrial Products and interest. in the Fire Safety and Oil Additives businesses. In addition, there were cash payments relating to discontinuance of the activities of Allana Afar in Ethiopia and the global ERP project (Harmonization Project).
Investing Activities
The net cash provided from investing activities in 2018 amounted to $331 million, compared with $333 million used in investing activity last year. This increase derives mainly as a result of net proceeds received from selling the fire safety and oil additives businesses in the amount of $902 million compare with $168 million received from selling an equity-accounted investee (IDE) in last year. This increase was partly offset by higher cash flows from operating activities along with the increase in the financial liabilities, constituted the sourceused for financing payment of the dividends, investments in property, plant and equipment and acquisition of activities.

equipment.

In 2015,2017, the net cash provided by operating activities was $573 million, compared with $893 million at 31 December 2014. Most of the decline in cash flows from operating activities derives from the decline in the net income, mainly as a result of the strike at ICL Dead Sea and ICL Neot Hovav, and after eliminating the capital gain in the amount of $364 million from sale of the companies that are not part of the Company's core businesses which are included in the cash flows from investing activities, an increase in the working capital due to payment of royalties in respect of prior periods, payments relating to retirement of employees, changes in the fair value of derivatives, changes in the balance of the trade receivables stemming from increased sales of potash upon conclusion of the strike, an increase in current interest payments and a payment relating to an operating lease on the concession site acquired in China.

Investing Activities


The net cash used in investing activities in 2016 amounted to $800$333 million, compared with $547$800 million in 2015.2016. The increasedecrease in the cash used in investing activities stems,derives, mainly, from proceeds received from selling an equity-accounted investee (IDE), in the amount of $168 million, a decrease in the cash flows used for investment in property, plant and equipment, lower purchases of intangible assets due to the discontinuance of the global ERP project (Harmonization Project) along with the acquisition of 15% of the shares of YTH (this acquisition was one of the conditions for closing of the YPH transaction),made in 2016, in exchange for a consideration of about $250 million.

In 2015, the net cash used in investing activities was $547 million, compared with $996 million in 2014. The decrease in cash used in investing activities derives mainly from a drop in investments in property, plant and equipment, mainly as a result of the strike at ICL Dead Sea and ICL Neot Hovav ($502 million compared to $752 million) after setting off the effect of payments paid to property, plant, and equipment suppliers in 2015 and business combinations, in the amount of $351 million (of which $163 million was paid with regards to YPH JV, $96 million with regards to Allana and $92 million in regards with Prolactal). These impacts were partially offset by the sale of companies that are not part of the Company's core businesses, in the amount of $364 million and an increase in investments in intangible assets.

Financing Activities

The net cash used in financing activities in 20162018 amounted to $239$894 million, compared with $511 million last year. This increase is mainly due to repayment of short-term credit, from proceeds received from selling the fire safety and oil additives businesses, in the amount of $283 million, compared with short-term credit received in the amount of $147 million last year.
The net cash used in financing activities in 2017 amounted to $511 million, compared with net cash provided by financing activities of $15$239 million in 2015.2016. The factor causing the decreaseincrease in the net cash providedused by financing activities is an increase inmainly due to repayment of long term loans, net, in the amount of $519$421 million, compared with the prior year.amount of $87 million made in 2016, along with higher dividend payments to the Company’s shareholders, in the amount of $75 million compared with 2016. On the other hand, there was a decreasean increase in the Company’s dividend payments compared with 2015,receipt of short-term credit from banks and others, net, in the amount of $185 million.

Net cash provided by financing activities in 2015 amounted to $15$133 million, as compared to $70 million in 2014. The primary reason for the net decrease in cash from financing activities is the reduction in the net amount of the long-term and short-term loans taken out in 2015, in the amount of $363 million, in contrast with $916 million in 2014, mainly due to a special dividend payment in March 2014, in the amount of $500 million, and the decrease in investment activities in 2015, which was partly offset by the decrease in cash flow from current activities, as specified above. Nonetheless, the Company’s net debt increased as a result of first-time consolidation of the net financial liabilities of the YPH JV in China.

2016.

171

As at December 31, 2016,2018, the Company’s non-currentnon‑current liabilities consisted of loans from financial institutions in the amount of $1,325$345 million and debentures in the amount of $1,471$1,470 million. For information about the currencies in which the Company's liabilities are denominated and their interest rates, see Note 15 to the Company's audited financial statements.our Audited Financial Statements. As at December 31, 2016,2018, the Company had $1,294$1,134 million of unutilized long-termlong‑term credit lines. As at March 1, 2017,of February 26, 2019, the companyCompany withdrew an additional $110$94 million from its existing credit facilities.

A portion of ICL's loans bear variable interest rates based on the short-termshort‑term LIBOR rate for a period of one to twelve months, plus a margin as defined in each loan agreement. Therefore, the Company is exposed to changes in the cash flows arising from changes in these interest rates. Some of the loans and debentures issued by ICL bear fixed interest for the entire loan period. The Company hedges part of this exposure using financial instruments to fix the range of the interest rates, in order to conform the actual interest-rateinterest‑rate structure to the projections regarding the anticipated developments in the interest rates.

For a description of material financial covenants in the Company’s loan agreements and any potential risk relating to compliance with them – see Note 15 to the Company’s audited financial statements.

to our Audited Financial Statements.

172

Credit Facilities:

The Company’s credit facilities, as at December 31, 2016,2018, are as follows:

IssuerEuropean bankGroup of eleven international banksAmerican bankEuropean Bank

Date of the credit facility 

March 2014 

March 2015 

March 2016 

December 2016 

Date of termination credit facility 

March 2020

March 2021

 

March 2021June 2023

The amount of the credit facility 

USD 35 million,
Euro 100 million
USD 1,705 millionUSD 150 millionUSD 136 million

Credit facility has been utilized 

- USD 750 million
 Euro 83 million
--
Interest rate

Libor/Euribor plus margin 0.9%-1.4%

 

Up to 33% use of the credit: Libor/Euribor + 0.7%.
From 33% to 66% use of the credit: Libor/Euribor + 0.8%
66% or more use of the credit: Libor/Euribor + 0.95%
Up to 33% use of the credit: Libor + 0.65%.
From 33% to 66% use of the credit: Libor + 0.75%
66% or more use of the credit: Libor + 0.95%
Libor +0.75%
Loan Type

USD loans and euro loans 

USD loans and euro loansUSD loansUSD loans
Pledges and restrictions

Financial covenants – see Note 15 Section C to the accompanying financial statements, a cross-default mechanism and a negative pledge. 

Financial covenants - see Note 15 Section C to the accompanying financial statements, a cross-default mechanism and a negative pledge.Financial covenants - see Note 15 Section C to the accompanying financial statements, a cross-default mechanism and a negative pledge.

Financial covenants - see Note 15 Section C to the accompanying financial statements, and a negative pledge.

Non-utilization fee

 

0.32%

 

0.21%

 

0.19%

 

0.30%

 

172 

 

Securitization

IssuerEuropean bank (1)Group of twelve international banks (2)European bank (3)
Date of the credit facilityMarch 2014March 2015December 2016
    
Date of credit facility terminationMarch 2019March 2023May 2025
    
The amount of the credit facility
USD 35 million
Euro 100 million
USD 1,200 millionUSD 100 million
    
Credit facility has been utilizedEuro 40 millionUSD 200 millionUSD 70 million
    
Interest rate
Up to 33% use of the credit: Libor/Euribor + 0.90%.
From 33% to 66% use of the credit: Libor/Euribor + 1.15%
66% or more use of the credit: Libor/Euribor + 1.40%
Up to 33% use of the credit: Libor/Euribor + 0.70%.
From 33% to 66% use of the credit: Libor/Euribor + 0.80%
66% or more use of the credit: Libor/Euribor + 0.95%
Libor + 0.45% + spread
    
Loan currency typeUSD and Euro loansUSD and Euro loansUSD loans
    
Pledges and restrictionsFinancial covenants - see Section D, a cross-default mechanism and a negative pledge.Financial covenants - see Section D, a cross-default mechanism and a negative pledge.Financial covenants - see Section D and a negative pledge.
    
Non-utilization fee0.32%0.21%0.30%
(1)After the date of the report, the Company elected not to realize the option of revolving credit facility extension, and to repay the utilized credit facility on the date of its termination.
(2)In October 2018, the Company entered into an agreement according to which, its commitment under certain revolving credit facility agreements will be reduced by a total aggregate amount of $655 million, to an amount of $1.2 billion.
(3)In June 2018, the maturity date of the credit facility was extended to 2025. In November 2018, the credit facility was reduced from $136 million to $100 million. As at the date of the report, the Company utilized $70 million of that credit facility.
173

Sale of receivables under securitization Transaction

In July 2015, the Company and certain Group subsidiaries (hereinafter – “the Subsidiaries”)the Subsidiaries) signed a series of agreements regarding a securitization transaction with three international banks (hereinafter – “thethe Lending Banks”)Banks) for the sale of their customertrade receivables to a foreign company which was established specifically for this purpose and which is not owned by the ICL Group (hereinafter – “thethe Acquiring Company”)Company).

Those agreements replace the prior securitization agreements in the amount of $350 million, which came to an end in July 2015. The main structure of the new securitization agreement is the same as the prior securitization agreement. The Company's policy is to utilize the securitization limit based on its cash-flowcash flow needs, alternative financing sources and market conditions. The new securitization agreement will expire in July 2020. InUnder the agreement,agreements, ICL undertook to comply with a financial covenant whereby the ratio of net debt to EBITDA will not exceed 4.75. If ICL does not complymeet with the saidthis ratio, the Acquiring Company is allowed tocan discontinue acquiring new trade receivables (without affecting the existing acquisitions). As at the reporting date of the report, ICL is in compliance withmeet the aforementionedabove financial covenant.
The Acquiring Company finances acquisition of the debts by means of a loan received from a financial institution, which is not related to ICL which finances. As at December 31, 2018, the loan outamount of the proceeds from the issuance of commercial paper on the U.S. commercial paper market. The repayment of both the commercial paper and the loan are backed by credit lines from the Lending Banks. The amount of cash that will be received in respect of the sale of the customer debts in the securitization transaction will be up to $405framework is $350 million.

The acquisitions are on an ongoing basis, such that the proceeds received from customers whose debts were sold are used to acquire new trade receivables.

The period in which the Subsidiaries are entitled to sell their trade receivables to the Acquiring Company is five years from the closing date of the transaction, where both parties have the option at the end of each year to give notice of cancellation of the transaction.

Once the Company transferred its trade receivables, it no longer has the right to sell them to another party. The selling price of the trade receivables is the amount of the debt sold, less the calculated interest cost based on the anticipated period between the sale date of the customer debt and its repayment date. Upon acquisition of the debt, the Acquiring Company pays the majoritymost of the debt price in cash and the remainder in a subordinated note, which is paid after collection of the debt sold. The rate of the cash consideration varies according to the composition and behavior of the customer portfolio. The Subsidiaries handle collection of the trade receivables included in the securitization transaction, on behalf of the Acquiring Company. In the case of a credit default, the Company bears approximately 30% of the overall secured trade receivable balance.

In addition, as part of the agreements a number ofseveral conditions were set in connection with the quality of the customer portfolios, which give the Lending Banks the option to end the undertaking or determine that some of the Subsidiaries, the customer portfolios of which do not meet the conditions provided, will no longer be included in the securitization agreements.

The Based on the above terms, the securitization of trade receivables does not meet the conditions for derecognition of financial assets prescribed in International Standard IAS 39,IFRS 9, regarding Financial Instruments – Recognition and Measurement, since the Group did not transfer all of the risks and rewards deriving from the trade receivables. Therefore, the receipts received from the Acquiring Company are presented as a financial liability as part of the short-term credit. As of December 31, 2016,2018, utilization of the securitization facility and trade receivables within this framework amounted to approximately$ 332 million (December 31, 2017 - $331 million (as at December 31, 2015, approximately $285 million).

Once the Company transferred its trade receivables, it no longer has the right to sell them to another party. In the case of a credit default, the Company bears 30% of the overall secured trade receivable balance.


174

Information on material loans and debentures:

Instrument TypeLoan dateOriginal Principal (millions)

Currency

 

Carrying amount

31 December, 2016

$ millions 

Interest ratePrincipal Repayment dateAdditional information
Loan-European BankDecember 2010100Euro-1.105%December 2015Repaid

Loan-Israeli institutions 

November 2013600NIS1444.94%

2015-2024

(annual repayment) 

 
Debentures-Series DDecember 2014800USD791

4.5%

(Effective rate 4.59%) 

December 2024

 

(1)
Loan from a European BankDecember 2015129USD129Libor+1.4%December 2019 
Debentures-Series E

April

2016

1,569NIS405

2.45%

(Effective rate 2.61%) 

2021- 2024

(annual repayment) 

(2)
Debenture (Privet issuance in USA)

March

2005 

125USD-5.72%March 2015Repaid
Debentures (private offering) – 3 seriesJanuary 201484USD844.55%January 2021 
1451455.16%January 2024
46465.31%January 2026
Loan-international institutions

July

2014 

35USD45Libor+1.55%2019-2024 
103.34%
30Euro60Euribor+1.4%-1.7%
272.1%-3.75%
YPH JV’s loansOctober 2014600CNY865.23%During 2019 
YPH JV’s bank loansOctober 2014700CNY1014.35%-4.57%During 2017 
Loan-European BankDecember 2014161BRL45CDI+1.35%

2015-2021

(2 yearly payments)

 
Loan-Asian bankApril 2016400CNY58CNH Hibor + 0.5%April 2017 

174 

debentures outstanding as at December 31, 2018:
 

Instrument typeLoan dateOriginal principal (millions)Currency
Carrying amount
($ millions)
Interest ratePrincipal repayment dateAdditional information
Loan-Israeli institutionsNovember 2013300Israeli Shekel674.74% (1)
2015-2024
(annual installment)
Partially prepaid
Debentures (private offering) – 3 seriesJanuary 2014
84
145
46
U.S Dollar
84
144
46
4.55%
5.16%
5.31%
January 2021
January 2024
January 2026
 
Loan-international institutionsJuly 201427Euro252.33%2019-2024Partially prepaid
Debentures - Series DDecember 2014800U.S Dollar1824.50%December 2024(2)
Loan - European BankDecember 2014161Brazilian Real19CDI+1.35%
2015-2021
(Semiannual installment)
 
Debentures - Series EApril 20161,569Israeli Shekel4162.45%
2021- 2024
(annual installment)
 
Loan - others April - October, 2016600Chinese Yuan Renminbi295.23%2019(3)
Loan - Asian BanksJune - October, 2018600Chinese Yuan Renminbi874.79% - 5.44%2019 
Loan - Asian BankApril 2018400Chinese Yuan Renminbi58CNH Hibor + 0.50%2019 
Debentures - Series FMay 2018600U.S Dollar5966.38%May 2038(4)
Loan - European BankDecember 201870U.S Dollar70Libor + 0.66%December 2021 
175

Additional information:

(1)Debentures series D

(1)          From April 2018, in accordance with the loan agreement, there has been a decrease in the interest rate, from 4.94% to 4.74%.
(2)          Debentures Series D
Private issuance of debentures pursuant to Rule 144A and Regulation S under the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended, to institutional investors in the U.S., Europe, and Israel. The notes are registered for trade in the TACT Institutional; by the Tel-Aviv Stock Exchange Ltd. The notes have been rated BBB (stable). In March 2016,2017, the rating company “Fitch Rating Ltd.” updated the rating outlook of the Company’s credit, together with the rating of the debentures, from stable to negative. In October 2016, the rating company “Standard & Poor’s” updatedlowered the Company’s credit rating, together with the rating of the debentures, from BBB to BBB- with a stable rating outlook. In November 2017, the rating company “Standard & Poor’s” reaffirmed the Company’s credit rating, together with the rating of BBB to a rating ofthe debentures, at BBB-, with a stable rating outlook.

(2)Debentures-Series E

The debentures were listed On May 29, 2018, the Company completed a cash tender offer for trading onits Series D debentures. Following the Tel-Aviv Stock Exchange. The Debentures are unsecured and contain standard terms and conditions and eventstender offer, the Company repurchased an amount of default, as well as a mechanism to raise the interest rate in the event of a decrease in the rating$616 million out of the Debentures (the interest rate will be increased by 0.25% per decrease inoriginal principal amount of $800 million. 

On May 10, 2018 and on June 21, 2018, respectively, the rating by one rating level, starting at a rating of (ilA) and reaching a maximum cumulative interest rate increase of 1% upon reaching a rating of (ilBBB)), a negative pledge undertaking and financial covenants ((1) minimum equity of not less than $1.55 billion; and (2) net debt to EBITDA ratio of not more than 1:5.5). On November 8, 2016, thecredit rating agency Standard & Poor'sS&P ratified the Company’s international credit rating, BBB- with a stable rating outlook, and credit rating agency Maalot ratified the Company’s credit rating, of 'ilAA'. The‘ilAA’ with a stable rating outlook.
(3)          Loans from others
In July 2018, ICL and YTH agreed to convert their owner’s loans in the YPH joint venture (each company holds 50%) in the amount of $146 million into equity by issuing shares. As a result, the consolidated debt was reduced by $73 million against “non‑controlling interest” equity balance.
(4)          Debentures-Series F
On May 31, 2018, the Company completed a private offering of senior unsecured notes to institutional investors pursuant to Rule 144A and Regulation S under the U.S. Securities Act of 1933. According to the terms of the Series F Debentures, the Company is stable.

required to comply with certain covenants, including restrictions on sale and lease-back transactions, limitations on liens, and standard restrictions on merger and/or transfer of assets. The Company is also required to offer to repurchase the Series F Debentures upon the occurrence of a "change of control" event, as defined in the indenture for the Series F Debentures. In addition, the terms of the Series F Debentures include customary events of default, including a cross‑acceleration to other material indebtedness. The Company is entitled to optionally repay the outstanding Series F Debentures at any time prior to the final repayment date, under certain terms, subject to payment of an agreed early repayment premium. The Series F Debentures have been rated BBB- by S&P Global Inc. and Fitch Rating Inc. with a stable rating outlook.

176

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with IFRS requires the management to make judgments, estimates and assumptions that affect the application of accounting policies and the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, income and expenses. Actual results may differ from these estimates.

The evaluation of accounting estimates used in the preparation of the Group’sICL’s financial statements requires management of the Company to make assumptions regarding laws interpretations which apply to the Company, circumstances and events that involve considerable uncertainty. Management of the Company prepares the estimates based on the basis of past experience, various facts, external circumstances, and reasonable assumptions according tobased on the pertinent circumstances of each estimate. Estimates and underlying assumptions are reviewed on an ongoing basis. Revisions to accounting estimates are recognized in the period in which the estimates are revised and in any future periods affected.

Information about assumptions made by the GroupICL with respect to the future and other reasons for uncertainty with respect to estimates that have a significant risk of resulting in a material adjustment to carrying amounts of assets and liabilities in the next financial year are included in the following notes:

table:

EstimatePrincipal assumptionsPossible effectsReference
Recognition of deferred tax asset

Tax rates expected to apply when the timing differences applied to Beneficiary Enterprise are realized is based on forecasts of future revenues to be earned.

The reasonability of future revenues to be earned to use future tax benefits.

Recognition or reversal of deferred tax asset in profit or loss.See Note 17 regarding taxes on income.income
Uncertain tax positions
The extent of the certainty that the Group’sICL’s tax positions will be accepted (uncertain tax positions) and the risk of it incurring any additional tax and interest expenses. This is based on an analysis of a number ofseveral matters including interpretations of tax laws and the Group’s pastICL’s experience.
Recognition of additional income tax expenses.See Note 17 regarding taxes on income.income
Post-employment employee benefitsActuarial assumptions such as the discount rate, future salary increases and the future pension increase.
An increase or decrease in the post-employment defined benefit obligation.
See Note 18 regarding employee benefits.
Assessment of probability of contingent and environmental liabilities including cost of waste removal/restoration

Whether it is more likely than not that an outflow of economic resources will be required in respect of potential liabilities under the environmental protection laws and legal claims pending against ICL and the Company and its investees.

estimation of their amounts. The waste removal/ restoration obligation dependsobligations depend on the reliability of the estimates of future removal costs. 

costs and interpretation of regulations.
Creation, adjustment or reversal of a provision for a claim and/or environmental liability including cost of waste removal/restoration.See Note 20 regarding contingent liabilities.liabilities
Recoverable amount of a cash generating unit, among other things, containing goodwill
TheExpected cash-flow forecasts, the discount rate, market risk and a budgetedthe forecasted growth rate.Change in impairment loss.See Note 13 regarding impairment testing.
Assessment of the fair value of the assets and liabilities acquired in business combinationsExpected cash-flowcash‑flow forecasts of the acquired business, and models for calculating the fair value of the acquired items and their depreciation and amortization periods.
Impact on the balance of assets and liabilities acquired and the depreciation and amortization in the statement of income.
 
Assessment of the net realizable value of inventoryFuture selling price and expected replacement price when used as the best available evidence for realizable value.
Decrease in the carrying value of the inventories and the results of operations accordinglyaccordingly.
 

Concessions, permits and business licenses

Forecast of obtaining renewed concessions, permits and business licenses which constitute the basis for the Company's continued operations and /or the Company's expectations regarding the holding of the operating assets by it and / or by a subsidiary until the end of their useful lives
Impact on the value of the operation, depreciation periods and residual values of related assets.
See Note 20 regarding contingent liabilities
Mineral reserves and resource deposits

Quantities and qualities estimates of mineral reserves and resource deposits are based on engineering, economic and geological data that is compiled and analyzed by the Company’s engineers and geologists.

Impact on the useful life of the assets relating to the relevant activity.

 

177

Principal Capital Expenditures and Divestitures

ICL had cash capital expenditures of $572 million, $457 million and $632 million $619 millionfor the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and $835 million in 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The above capital expenditures includecomprise of investments in fixed and intangible assets.

ICL’S principal capital expenditures since January 1, 20142016 have consisted of work on the dike surrounding the evaporation ponds at the Dead Sea, constructionfollowing main projects:
Construction work with respect to a new power station at Sodom, investments as partSodom. The cogeneration plant has the capacity to generate 230MW and 330 tonnes/hour of steam and is reducing ICL's carbon footprint. As of December 31, 2018, the plant was operational. The Company intends to operate the station concurrently with the existing power station, which will be operated on a partial basis in a "hot back up" format, for production of electricity and steam.
Consolidation of production site and expanding logistic capacity in Spain. A closure of a planmine and processing plant, in parallel to graduallya development of an adjacent mine and processing plants through a capacity increase the production capacity of the Sodom plans, investmentsremaining mine up to increaseabout 1.3 million ton KCl /year and surrounding logistics infrastructures. The investment includes a tunnel that will connect the production capacitymine to the surface plants through conveyor belts, as well as a new port loading bay facility at Barcelona.
Raising the coastal dykes of the Company’s minesevaporation ponds at the Dead Sea. The objective of the project is to protect the hotels, which are located on the Western coast of Pond 5 from flooding due to a rise in Europewater levels in the evaporation pond, and twountil the harvest project (see below) will commence operations. The project is managed by the governmental Dead Sea Protection Company, and ICL is participating in 39.5% of its funding.
New pumping station (P-9) in Sodom. Due to the receding water level in the Northern basin of the Dead Sea, the water line is receding from the current pumping station and construction of a new pumping station is therefore necessary. The new pumping station will serve as the main brine intake station for pumping brine from the Dead Sea to the coastal transmission system. The project consists of a sea base for the pumps, a bridge to the shore, a shore base, delivery pipes and an open canal. In 2017, the Board of Directors approved an investment in construction of the P-9 pumping station.  In 2017 and 2018, DSW signed agreements with several execution and infrastructure companies, in a total amount of $160 million (out of the total project cost of about $250 million), for construction of the P-9 Pumping Station. The P-9 Pumping Station is expected to commence its operation during the year 2020.
Salt harvesting in the Dead Sea. A project aiming to keep a constant solution level in Pond 5 that complies with the Israeli regulatory requirements of 15.1m, through dredging the salt settlement in the pond and transporting it for submergence in the Dead Sea. ICL's share in the project's funding is 80%. In October 2017, ICL signed a 12-year agreement that the cost of which for ICL is $280 million, for execution of the first stage of the salt harvesting project with Holland Shallow Seas Dredging Ltd., which includes, among others, the construction of a special dredger that is designed to execute the salt harvesting. The dredger is expected to enter into service towards the end of 2019.
178

In 2018, the main capital investments that were terminated during 2016 –(CAPEX) included the Harmonization project (one centralized ERP system) andconsolidation of the Allana project in Ethiopia (for additional information regarding the Allana project, see “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors”).

Particularly in 2016, ICL’s capital expenditures include: expansion of its potash production capacity at the Suria site in Spain (mine, facilitieslogistics and logistics); investmentsport), construction of a phosphogypsum pond in ICL Rotem (pond 5), raising the coastal dykes in the Food Specialties business line in Austria, including expansion of the production capacity of dairy proteins and other components usedevaporation ponds, as well as investment in the food and beverage industry; and an investmentnew power station in respectSodom, commencement of construction of the new powerpumping station at(P-9) in the Sodom sitenorthern basin of the Dead Sea, the salt harvesting project in the Dead Sea and Clean Air Act related projects in Israel.

In 2019 the Company's plan is to focus on continuing the development of its production capacity in Spain, the new pumping station (P-9) in Sodom, Clean Air Act related projects in Israel and the salt harvesting project in the Dead Sea. In addition, the Company is will be investing in the examination stagea new production capacity of white phosphoric acid as part of its partnership in connection with projects in the YPH JV in China.

China (YPH).

The Company financingfinances its capital expenditures from cash flows from operations and from credit facilities.

The Company

ICL’s integrated business model is continuingbased on its unique access to essential minerals that support its specialty downstream activities – with the arrangement stemmingfocus on crop nutrition and industrial markets. Our model creates significant operational synergies, which derive from the agreement between Dead Sea Workscombination of our attractive assets and broad value‑added solutions. In 2018 ICL launched its “Business Culture of Leadership” strategy, focused on enhancing market leadership across its three core mineral value chains of bromine, potash and phosphate, as well as realizing the Stategrowth potential of Israel regarding financingInnovative Ag Solutions. As part of the costs of the dike (the temporary defenses stage) pursuant to which Dead Sea Works will bear 39.5% of the financing and the State of Israel will bear the rest. For additional details regarding this agreement – see Note 20 to our audited financial statements.

According to the Company's strategy from time to time various possibilitiesobtain leadership positions in all its activities and given ICL’s integrated business model we are examined in connectionconstantly considering measures, including divestiture opportunities, with respect to our low synergy businesses and businesses where we cannot be the market leader. ICL is constantly monitoring the competitive environment and will continue to seek ways to adhere with its non-core activities, includingstrategy.

In December 2017, the sale thereof. Accordingly, in 2016 the Company successfully completed the sale of Clearon (chlorine-based biocide activitiesits holdings in USA)IDE Technologies Ltd., for net proceeds of $168 million. in accordance with ICL strategy. Additional divestiture opportunitiesMarch 2018, the Company completed the sale transaction of the Fire Safety and Oil Additives businesses, for a total consideration of $1,010 million, of which $953 million is in our non-core businesses include IDEcash and Novotide$57 million is in the form of a long-term loan to a subsidiary of the buyer.

Furthermore, in July 2018, the Company completed the sale of the assets and business of its subsidiary, Rovita, for no consideration.

179

C. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, PATENTS AND LICENSES, ETC.


Research and development

ICL’s R&D activities are part of its global strategic plan. The activities include both internal research and joint activities with a wide range of universities, and research institutes and start-ups along with other long-termlong‑term innovative activities. ICL’s R&D is directedaimed towards present and future market needs and focuses on identifying additional uses for the minerals in use and their derivatives.

Fields of R&D include:
Advanced crop nutrition: bio/no bio degradable coating; nutrient sensing; growth enhancers (bio/non bio stimulants); N fixation.
Advanced Materials: energy storage and low energy consumption applications; construction and paints & coatings additives; flame retardants; biocides; circular economy – "from waste to product" concept.
We proactively look for open innovation platforms with research institutes, academia, startups and others. In 2016,2018, the Company significantly strengthened its core area research activities with third parties in respect of: agriculture, food, and engineered materials.parties. The agronomicAgronomic research collaboration between ICL and the Volcani Institute (CPFN), which is based in Gilat in the southern part of Israel, presented its first annual work plan.executed 21 active projects in addition to field trials and agronomic workshops. The activities of ICL Innovation, (Incubator), which focuses mainly on high-riskhigh‑risk technologies in the initial stages of development, has six22 running projects, and six newwhich are done in collaboration with partners from the academy and/or industry. YPRTECH, our JV in China, is running 10 projects were approved for commencement in the first quarter of 2017.

The cross-segment development teams which were set up in 2014 by the ICL R&D Management Forum, headed by the CTO, are continuing to work on subjects of common interest in order to promote the development and application of new products and technologies.

technologies, based on Phosphor derivatives.

The CTO office leads ICL’s Technology Roadmap, which is driven from scouting of global trends combined with ICL's constant development and improvement needs.
The defined goals of our research and development operations are:

1.          Implement an innovation thinking in the company and encourage ideation processes;
2.          Focus on balanced portfolio based on time to market, value and risks;
3.          Increase the Company’s new products ratio;
4.          Continuous process improvement in the Company’s manufacturing facilities by reducing production costs, operating optimization and reduction of waste streams and environmental impacts based on circular economy environment;
5.          Cultivating the R&D human resources and the technological leadership;
6.          Investing in external collaboration for achieving new ideas and/or know-how knowledge; and
7.          Joining consortiums for external funding and backward integration over the entire project value-chain, in order to reduce risks and enhance controls.

180

Below are the main areas of the R&D activities by segments:
Industrial Products
1.·ExpansionNew Flame retardants for Printed wire boards: Development of new phosphorus‑based solutions for PWB according to new emerged demands from the market e.g. Polyquel® P100. This is a polymeric halogen free flame-retardant active ester curing agent for epoxy laminates with superior performance.
·Brominated polymeric flame retardants: Development of the Company’s new productsnext generation polymeric/active brominated flame retardants which are more environmentally friendly and its new technology portfolio,future substitutes for threatened products.

2.·Continuous process improvementFlame retardants for polyurethanes: development of new phosphorus‑based solutions and integrated phosphorus/bromine solutions as flame-retardants for the polyurethane market (flexible and rigid foam). VeriQuel F100 is a new flexible halogen free active flame retardant for flexible polyurethane being launched to the market.
·
Textiles: continuing development of TexFRon®, a series of textile flame‑retardant products. The series includes TexFRon 9001, the FR acrylic binder TexFRon P and the low-melt polymeric TexFRon 4002. Additionally, it includes TexFRon AG and TexFRon 5001, both are non-halogen flame retardants. TexFRon®4002 is an effective and environmentally friendly solution for diverse textile products, replacing DECA and offering a transparent and laundry‑durable solution that is not currently available in the Company’s manufacturing facilities by reducing production costs, operating optimizationmarket. In addition, unique ATO-free (Antimony Trioxide) flame‑retardant systems were introduced to the market. These green solutions created interest among the Company's customers and reduction of waste streamsare being commercially evaluated; TexFRon 4002 and environmental impacts, andTexFRon 5001 are Oeko-Tex® certified.

3.·Cultivating the Company’s human resources and technological leadership.Energy storage: continued development of bromine‑based energy storage solutions for Br-Battery companies, using diverse compounds.

The R&D activities of the Essential Minerals segment in 2016 were focused on its two business lines – ICL Potash & Magnesium and ICL Phosphate:

ICL Potash and Magnesium business line

·Improvement
Ecological research to reduce emissions:  e.g. wastewater management, air emissions and solid/organic waste reuse.
·Biocides: continued development of processesnew materials for water treatment and reductionprevention of costsbiofilm in industrial water cooling systems and pulp & paper plants.
·Phosphorus‑based products: development of new phosphorus‑based solutions for hydraulic fluids.
·Magnesia-based products: development of formulations in order to fulfil unmet needs in the potash plants;markets, such as replacing aluminum products in deodorants and zinc oxide in several consumer products.  

·Improvement
Support of production: improving product quality, production cost, energy saving, recycling and waste treatment. Changing and improving processes while using the qualityprinciples of the products being sold;green chemistry.  

·Research
Trouble shooting and equipment maintenance cycle improvement using better construction materials preventing of accelerated corrosion, wear and tear, and equipment adaptation.
The total Industrial Products segment’s R&D expenses in 2018 were about $21 million.

181

Potash
·Activities of efficiency and synergy measures in order to increase potash production and reducing cost per tonne at the potash and magnesium plants in Sodom;
·Advancement of research regarding environmental protection, including development of methods for treating and reducing effluents;

·Analysis of alternative methods for increasing the production capacity of carnallite production capacity;at the evaporation ponds;

·Geological examination of our concessions in Spain in order to ascertain whether a significant expansion is possible;

·Examination of technologies for improvement of the production of polysulphate on the Company's site in the UK; and

·Development of a new product from potash dust – granulated potash with or without micro-nutrients.

ICL Phosphate business line

·ImprovementImplementation of processesthe recommendations of the R&D department designed to clear bottlenecks, focused on the flotation and reductioncompaction areas, with the purpose of costs inincreasing the production plants;capacity in Spain;

·ImprovementPotashpluS compaction – commissioning of operation at the compaction facility and optimization of the quality of the products being sold;compaction process parameters;

·Research regarding environmental protection, includingPotashpluS granulation – development is carried out at IFDC (International Fertilizer Development Center) and is currently at the stage of methods for treating and reducing effluents;increasing production capacity to 400 kg per hour. This being a preliminary stage prior to development unto production on a full industrial scale;

·DevelopmentGranular Polysulphate – optimization of the process on two aspects: output and quality, as well as implementation of a new fertilizer from waste streams;organic coating.

The total Potash segment's R&D expenses in 2018 were about $8 million.
182

Phosphate Solutions
·Further analysis ofThe segment continues to check the adaptation of various potential types of phosphate rock (bituminous and brown phosphates) for the production of phosphoric acid and its downstream products as part of an effort to exploitutilize and increase existing phosphate reserves;reserves. In 2019 the segment will further analyze these types of phosphate including R&D, pilots, plant testing activities and its economic feasibility.

·Improvement of processes and reduction of costs in the production plants;
·Research regarding environmental protection, including development of methods for treating and reducing effluents;
·Development of applications for water conservation and improving availability of the fertilizers around the root;
·Development of a new PK fertilizer fully soluble;
·
Implementation of software to track global product life cycle to support global visibility of projects and formulas
·
The R&D unit continuously looks out for new areas of innovation, for example to translate megatrends like sodium reduction with the target to create a full product portfolio based on ICL’s mineral tool box. This trend is relevant for processed meat applications. Furthermore, the segment participates in the trend of meat substitutes to complement a competitive product portfolio for classical phosphate customers in the meat, poultry and seafood industries
·
Successful launch of the phosphate-based additive HALOX® CW-314 into the paints & coatings market. The additive is enhancing the infrared (IR) reflectance and thermal emissivity of elastomeric roof coating while maintaining the dirt pick-up resistance (DPUR) and prevention of mildew growth; and
·
At the end of 2018, the R&D departments for food specialties and industrial phosphate applications were integrated into one support platform. The technical capabilities and the project portfolio were streamlined to fulfill the actual business needs and to realize financial synergies.
The total Phosphate Solutions segment's R&D expenses in 2018 were about $12 million.
Innovative Ag Solutions
The IAS segment will function as ICL’s innovative arm, promoting innovation, developing new products and services as well as digital platforms and technological solutions for farmers and agronomists.
The segment will drive collaborations with innovative technologies and its goal is to introduce and integrate new digital solutions for the agricultural world by utilizing, among other things, external knowledge and platforms.
183

Additional targets:
·Improvement of product portfolio with new product formulations; Mainly tailored formulations on customer demand
·Development of improved production options for HiPeaK;
·Development of controlled‑release NPK fertilizers with a quicker fully degradable coating;
·Development of applications for water conservation and improving availability of the fertilizers around the root; and

·Development of a fertilizer with sulfur.


The total Essential Minerals segment’s R&D expenses in 2016 were $15 million.

The R&D activities of the Specialty Solutions segment in 2016 were focused on its four business lines – ICL Industrial Products, ICL Specialty Fertilizers, ICL Advanced Additives and ICL Food Specialties:

ICL Industrial Products business line

·Brominated polymers: continuing development of polymeric/active brominated flame retardants, which are expected to become the next generation of environmentally friendly flame retardants, and future substitutes for threatened products, such as DECA and FR 1410;

·Textiles: continuing development of TexFRon™, a series of textile flame-retardant products. TexFRon™ 4002 is an effective and environmentally friendly solution for diverse textile products, replacing DECA and offering a transparent and laundry-durable solution that is not currently available in the market. In the previous year, flame-retardant products for nylon were developed to satisfy an unmet demand in the market. In addition, unique ATO-free (Antimony Trioxide) flame-retardant systems were introduced to the market. These green solutions created interest among the Company's customers and are being commercially evaluated;

·Energy storage: continued development of bromine-based energy storage solutions using diverse technologies;

·Ecological research to improve the wastewater treatment systems, and to reduce air emissions and solid waste;

·Biocides: continued development of new materials for water treatment and prevention of biofilm in irrigation systems and industrial water cooling systems;

·Phosphorus-based products: development of new phosphorus-based solutions and/or integrated phosphorus/bromine solutions as flame-retardants for the polyurethane market (i.e., flexible and rigid foam). Common applications of polyurethane flame retardants are in the construction (insulation), furniture and automotive industries. In addition, new solutions for hydraulic fluids are being developed;

·Support of production: improving product quality and lowering production costs by changing and improving processes, while using the principles of green chemistry (for example, reduction in the use of organic solvents). There is extensive use of the “sustainability index” model for guiding the development of new products and processes; and

·Engineering: research in the area of construction materials in order to overcome problems of accelerated corrosion, wear and tear, and equipment adaptation.

ICL Specialty Fertilizers business line

·Improvement of the portfolio with new product formulations;

·Development of a product having a high-acid content for diverse soluble fertilizer applications;

·Development of controlled-release NPK fertilizers containing micro-nutrients, which are not currently available in the market;

·Development of controlled-release fertilizers with an improved environmental profile;

·Development of applications for water conservation and improving availability of the fertilizers around the root; and

·Initiation and development of new technologies to increase nutrient use efficiency.

ICL Advanced Additives business line

·Expansion of the R&D labs in St Louis, Missouri: The R&D and applications testing capabilities of ICL Advanced Additives in St Louis were expanded. The new labs will primarily focus on construction, paints & coatings, metal treatment and cleaning additives, as well as identifying new phosphate applications;

·Introduction of new Phos-Chek™ Class B foams into the Americas. ICL Advanced Additives developed new Class B firefighting foam technologies which have passed all U.S. military specifications and are now being used by the United States Air Force;

·ICL Advanced Additives launched several new products in 2016. In the paints & coatings business, a new liquid corrosion inhibitor known as HALOX 570LS was launched for architectural waterborne paints. The technology is a direct response to the voice-of-customer (VOC) initiatives to develop easier to use products which are not prone to explosive dust or require grinding to smaller particle sizes. HALOX 700, a zinc, aluminum phosphate anti-corrosive pigment was introduced to the market as well. This multi-metal corrosion inhibitor is designed for high performance urethane and epoxy primers which are used for anti-corrosion of steel and aluminum for industrial coatings as well as automotive refinish coatings. LOPON 105, a biocide-free dispersant was launched in Europe. This product allows European customers to reduce the biocide content in coatings and to stay below the labeling threshold.

·Cross business line collaboration between ICL Advanced Additives and ICL Industrial Products was highly successful. Several new technologies from ICL Industrial Products were successfully evaluated in ICL Advanced Additives, particularly, TexFRon™, a halogen-free flame retardant, LaqFRon™, a brominated styrene acrylic flame retardant polymer for wood coatings, a low moisture magnesium borate, a powerful smoke suppressant for plastics, phosphate esters as adhesion promoters and plasticizers, and nano zinc phosphate dispersions for anti-corrosion in clear coat systems;

·R&D activities expanded into the Specialty Minerals sub-business line with the recent addition of magnesia, magnesium hydroxide, magnesium chloride, pure potassium chloride and calcium carbonate (pharma grade) into ICL Advanced Additives. Two new products were launched from the Specialty Minerals R&D team in Israel – CareMag™ D and CareMag™ B for personal care and anti-rash baby creams, respectively. Patent filings were also completed;

·Process technology activities improved the competitiveness as a global supplier for P2S5, phosphoric acid and phosphate salts.

ICL Food Specialties business line

·Development of new products based on milk proteins;

·Providing solutions for modifying texture and stability of food products, including meat substitutes and beverages;

·Novel product applications for dairy, beverages, bakery and processed meat products by exploiting synergies between food phosphates, proteins, starches and fibers;

·Continued development of applications for low-sodium salts based on raw materials from the Dead Sea and integration of SALONA™ into, among others, spice blends for meat products and culinary sauces.

The total SpecialtyInnovative Ag Solutions segment’s R&D expenses in 20162018 were $51about $11 million.


184

Intellectual property

The Company believes that ourits intellectual property is crucial for protecting and developing its business activities.

ICL Industrial Products has 317about 850 granted patents which were registered over the years and 117 patent applications in various stages of review around the world. In 2016, 56 new patent applications filed by countries.

ICL Industrial Products were approved.

ICL Specialty Fertilizersalso has 23 groups of patents, related to derivatives of the Osmocote brand, for slow released soluble fertilizers, P1and P2 coating production technology and for applications of controlled release fertilizers and plant protection products.

ICL Advanced Additives has, in various countries, 106over 3,000 registered trademarks and 72 registered patents.

ICL Food Specialties has, in various countries, 789 registered trademarks and 51 registered patents.

worldwide, including inter-alia:

·Fyrol® - a brand name for a range of phosphorus-containing flame retardants targeting flexible and rigid polyurethane foam applications.
·Joha® - a global trademark for dairy specialties, which specializes in emulsifying salts for processed cheese.
·Merquel® - a line of inorganic brominated salts which can be used to control mercury emissions from coal power plants.
·Osmocote® - a leading brand in the area of controlled released fertilizers which uses innovative technologies and is used globally by container nursery stocks, pot- plant growers and more.
·Peters® - a brand of water soluble fertilizers, specifically designed for bedding-, pot- and container nursery plants.
·Tari® - a brand in the meat industry as well as in the artisan business which focuses on the production and processing of meat products with functional additives, spices and flavors.
·Brifisol® - a global brand in the meat and seafood industries, which concentrates in improving texture by adding cryoprotectant for frozen food products such as meat, shrimp, fish filets and more.
We do not believe that the expirationloss of any patent,single or their violation by a competitor,group of related patents or trademarks would not have a notablematerial effect on our operations or our financial results.


D. TREND INFORMATION

D. TREND INFORMATION
Trend information is included throughout the other sections of this Item 5.“Item 5 - Operating and Financial Review and Prospects— A. Operating Results”. In addition, the fluctuations in the operating results may continue in the upcoming quarters. Specific material drivers of these trends are identified in the discussion above with respect to the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152018, 2017 and 2014.2016. Seasonality of our business is included in Item 4.“Item 4 - Information on the Company—B. Business Overview.

Overview”.

E. OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

As of December 31, 2016,2018, we had no material off-balance sheet arrangements, other than the amounts reported as operating lease obligations in “Item 5.F5 – Operating and Financial Reviews and Prospects - .F - Contractual Obligations”.

and the amounts described in Note 15H (2) to our Audited Financial Statements.


185

F. CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS


The following table presents information related to our contractual obligations, including estimated interest payments, as of December 31, 2016.

 As at December 31, 2016
 Total
amount (2)
12 months or less1-2
years
3-5
years
More than 5 years
 $ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions
Credit from banks and others (not including current maturities)576576---
Trade payables644644---
Other payables334334---
Operating lease obligations258462159132
Purchase obligations(1)66333312215256
Employee Benefits6073199154323
Long-term debt and debentures3,4211131111,6411,556
Total

6,503

2,077

353

2,006

2,067

      

2018.
As at December 31, 2018
Total
amount (2)
12 months
or less
1-2
years
3-5
years
More than
5 years
$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions
Credit from banks and others (not including current maturities) 556 556---
Trade payables 715 715---
Other payables 330 330---
Operating lease obligations 359 50 45 103 161
Purchase obligations(1) 3,033 646 192 606 1,589
Employee Benefits 526 25 80 126 295
Long-term debt and debentures 2,855 152 453 1,084 1,166
Total 8,374 2,474 770 1,919 3,211

(1)This information excludes agreements in the ordinary course of business for purchases within the next twelve months.

(2)
The amounts presented, including long-term items, are presented in nominal values (and include estimated interest, so that they differ from their carrying amount).
As at December 31, 2018
Total
amount
12 months
or less
1-2
years
3-5
Years
More than
5 years
$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions
Financial liabilities – derivative instruments utilized for economic hedging     
Foreign currency and interest derivative instruments 16 16---
Derivative instruments on energy and marine transport 5 4 1--
  21 20 1--

(2)Including estimated interest therefore differs from the carrying amount.G. SAFE HARBOR


 As at December 31, 2016
 Total amount12 months or less1-2
years
3-5
Years
More than 5 years
 $ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions
Financial liabilities – derivative instruments utilized for economic hedging     
Interest rate swaps and  options5--14
Foreign exchange derivatives33---
 

8

3

-

1

4

      

G. SAFE HARBOR

The safe harbor provided in Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Exchange Act, or the statutory safe harbors, shall apply to forward-lookingforward‑looking information provided pursuant to ”Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—F. Contractual obligations” above. For our cautionary statement on the forward-looking statements in this Annual Report, see ”Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements”.

186

Item 6 – DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES

A. DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS


A.DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS
The following table lists the names and ages of our directors as ofat the publication date of this Annual Report. The mailing address of our directors is c/o Israel Chemicals Ltd., 23 Aranha Street, Millennium Tower, Tel Aviv, 61070,6120201, Israel.

NameAgePositionCommencement date as director

Johanan Locker6062ExecutiveApril 2016 and as Chairman of the Board of Directorssince August 2016
Aviad Kaufman4648DirectorMarch 2014
Avisar Paz6062DirectorApril 2001
Geoffery MerszeiLior Reitblatt6661DirectorNovember 2017
Dr. Miriam Haran67Director
Yaacov Dior
Nadav Kaplan(1)
73DirectorAugust 2018
Ovadia Eli7274DirectorAugust 2011
Reem Aminoach58March 2017
Ruth Ralbag58January 2018
Sagi Kabla4042DirectorFebruary 2016
Yoav Doppelt(2)
50December 2018
(1)On August 20, 2018, the annual General Meeting of the Company's shareholders appointed Dr. Nadav Kaplan as an external director of the Company, for a first three-year term of office. For further details about Dr. Kaplan, see below.
(2)
On December 12, 2018, the Board of Directors appointed Mr. Yoav Doppelt as a director of the Company, until the next annual General Meeting. For further details about Mr. Doppelt, see below.
(3)On January 10, 2018, Mr. Shimon Eckhaus66Director ceased serving as a director of the Company.


*On April 2016 the Board of Directors has appointed Mr. Johanan Locker as a director, and on 29 August 2016 the general meeting of our shareholders approved the said appointment. As of 15 August 2016 Mr. Locker serves as the Executive Chairman of the Board, replacing Mr. Nir Gilad, whose term in said position concluded at that date.

On 8 September 2016 Mr. Stefan Borgas gave notice of his decision to resign from office as CEO and member of the Board, due to personal reasons.

Messrs. Eran Sarig and Ron Moskovitz resigned from the Board on 14 March 2016 and 5 January 2017, respectively.

On March 14, 2017, the Board of Directors has approved the appointment of Mr. Reem Aminoach as member of the Company's Board. Mr. Aminoach's tenure will be in effect until the next general meeting of the Company's shareholders. Mr. Aminoach is a Certified public accountant, with a BA in Accountancy and Economics, Tel-Aviv University (academic honors, Dean's honor list) and MBA in business administration, Tel-Aviv University. Until recently, Mr. Aminoach served as the founding partner of Shtainmetz Aminoach & Co, certified public accountants. Mr. Aminoach was a brigadier general at military reserve service, and was former Head of Budgets at the Department of Security, and financial advisor to the IDF Chief of Staff. Mr. Aminoach was formerly a director at Ofer Bros. Ltd and director and chairman of the audit committee, at Zim Ltd. (of Israel Corporation's group). Mr. Aminoach was also formerly a member of Hadassah Hospital Board Governors.

Mr. Yaacov Dior and

(4)On February 13, 2018, Mr. Geoffery Merszei ceased serving as a director of the Company.
(5)On February 26, 2018, Mr. Yaacov Dior ceased serving as an external director of the Company.
(6)On August 29, 2018. Dr. Miriam Haran ceased serving as an external director of the Company.
187


Dr. Nadav Kaplan and Ms. Ruth Ralbag are “external directors” underpursuant to the Israeli Companies Law, 5759-1999 (the “Companies Law”), as described under “Item 6.6 - Directors, Senior Management and Employees—Employees — C. Board Practices—Practices — External Directors”.

Mr. Lior Reitblatt is an independent director pursuant to the Israeli Companies Law.
Ms. Ruth Ralbag, Messrs. Yaacov Dior, Miriam Haran, Geoffrey MerszeiNadav Kaplan, Reem Aminoach and Shimon EckhausLior Reitblatt are independent directors under the rules applicable to U.S. companies listed on the NYSE. Messrs. Johanan Locker, Avisar Paz, Aviad Kaufman, Sagi Kabla, and Ovadia Eli and Yoav Doppelt are not considered independent directors by virtue of the positions they hold with our controlling shareholder or in the Company; these directors are also not considered independent directors also under Israeli law due to their relationship with our controlling shareholder or with the Company.

Johanan Locker. Mr. Johanan Locker serves as director since April 2016 and as Chairmanchairman of the Board since August 2016.board of the Soroka Medical Center Friends’ Association. Prior to joining ourthe Board, Mr. Locker was the CEO of Clal Heavy Industries and Real Estate Ltd. (2014-2016). He served as chairmanChairman of the boardsBoards of several companies, including Beit Shemesh Engines, Hadera Paper, the Golf & Co. Group and Clal Sun. He was also a boardBoard member at Mashav Initiating and Development, Taavura Holdings and Jafora-Tabori. Mr. Locker served as strategic consultant of Clal Industries Ltd. (2013-2014) and as the Military Secretary to the Prime Minister of Israel (2010-2012). Mr. Locker, a Major General (reserve), held various command positions in the Israeli Air Force, among them, IAF chiefChief of staff,Staff, deputy IAF commander (2008-2010), headHead of Air Division (2005-2008), commanderCommander of the Hatzerim IAF Base (2001-2004) and headHead of the Planning Division (1997-2001). Mr. Locker held several positions in the operational headquartersOperations Department of the Israeli Air Force (1994-1996) and served as a fighter squadron commander (1991-1994). Mr. Locker holds a BA in Economicseconomics and Business Administrationbusiness administration (with honors) from the Bar Ilan University and an MA in Public Administrationpublic administration from the Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University.

Avisar Paz

Aviad Kaufman. Mr. Paz serves as director since April 2001. HeKaufman is the chief executive officer of Israel Corporation and was previously Israel Corporation's chief financial officer. Mr. Paz serves as director in various subsidiaries of Israel Corporation. He serves as director in Oil Refineries Ltd. Mr. Paz holds a BA in Economics and Accounting from Tel Aviv University and is a certified public accountant in Israel.

Aviad Kaufman. Mr. Kaufman serves as director since March 2014. He is the chief financial officer of Quantum Pacific (UK) LLP, and chairman of the board of Israel Corporation Ltd. since 1 December 2016. He is also, a directorboard member of Kenon Holdings Ltd., and IC Power Pte. Ltd.,other private companies, each of which may be considered associated with the same ultimate beneficiary, Mr. Idan Ofer. Mr. KaufmanPreviously, he served as chief financial officer of Quantum Pacific Advisory Limited (2008-2012)(UK) LLP (2008-2017). He served as director of international taxation and held various senior corporate finance roles at Amdocs Ltd. (2002-2007). Previously, Mr. Kaufman held various consultancy positions with KPMG. Mr. Kaufman is a certified public accountant and holds a BA in Accounting and Economics from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem (with honors), and an MBA majoring in Finance from Tel Aviv University.

Avisar Paz.


Sagi Kabla. Mr. Kabla serves as director since 8 February 2016. HePaz is the chief financial officerChief Executive Officer of Israel Corporation since December 2015. Heand was previously Israel Corporation's Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Paz serves as director in Bazan Group and previously served as senior executivevarious subsidiaries of business development, strategy and IR in Israel Corporation. Prior to joining Israel Corporation, including in Oil Refineries Ltd. Mr. Kabla held various positions at KPMG Corporate Finance. Mr. KablaPaz holds a BA in economics and accounting from Tel Aviv University and is a certified public accountantCertified Public Accountant in IsraelIsrael.

Lior Reitblatt. Mr. Reitblatt is a Certified Public Accountant, and holds a BA in Accountingaccounting and Economicseconomics from Bar-IlanTel Aviv University and an MBA (Finance) from the CollegeUniversity of Management.

Ovadia Eli.California, Berkeley. Until recently, Mr. Eli servesReitblatt served as director since August 2011. HeCEO and Chairman of the Board of Super-Pharm (Israel) Ltd. Mr. Reitblatt has also previously served, among other things, as Chairman of the Board of Life Style Ltd. and member of the board of Office Depot Israel Ltd.

188

Nadav Kaplan. Dr. Kaplan is the chairman of the board of ORAN Safety Glass, since 2008. He served as chairman of the board in 11 industrial companies and was also a board member of 4 Israeli public companies. Dr. Kaplan held the military rank of Colonel (res.), served as a combat navigator in regular and reserve service (1964-1997). Prior to his retirement (1986), he was the head of the Planning Division of IAF. Dr. Kaplan holds a BA in Economics and Business Administration from Bar Ilan University, a Master of Science in Management from Massachusetts Institute of Technology (M.I.T) and Ph.D from Haifa University in Memory Studies.
Ovadia Eli. Mr. Eli is Chairman of the Board of Oil Refineries Ltd. He served as chairmanChairman of the boardBoard of the Israel Airports Authority, Israel Military Industry (I.M.I), Shmanim Besisyim Haifa Ltd. and I.C.P.I. He was a member of the boardsBoards of directorsDirectors of Salt Industries Israel Ltd., Shaarei Ribit Ltd., Zim Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. and OPC Rotem Ltd. Mr. Eli holds a BA in Educational Counselingeducational counseling and Bible Studiesbible studies from the Haifa University and is a graduate of the Lifshitz Teachers College in Jerusalem.

Yaacov Dior

Reem Aminoach. Mr. DiorAminoach is a Certified Public Accountant, and holds a BA in accounting and economics, Tel-Aviv University (academic honors, Dean's honor list) and MBA in business administration, Tel-Aviv University. Until recently, Mr. Aminoach served as externalthe founding partner of the accounting firm Shtainmetz Aminoach & Co. In his military service, Mr. Aminoach, Brigadier general, served as a member of the General Staff Forum of the IDF, Head of Budgets at the Ministry of Defense, financial advisor to the IDF Chief of Staff and Head of the IDF Budget Division. Mr. Aminoach served as director at Ofer Investments Ltd. and as director and Chairman of the Audit Committee at Zim Ltd., of the Israel Corporation group. Mr. Aminoach also served as a member of the Board of Governors of Hadassah Medical Center.
Ruth Ralbag. Ms. Ralbag has served as CFO of the Shaare Zedek Medical Center in Jerusalem since October 2011, and until October 2014previously served as Deputy Director of Medical Finance at the Tel Aviv Sourasky (Ichilov) Medical Center (2009-2011), Head of the Hospital Administration and servesDeputy Director General of Planning, Budget and Pricing at the Ministry of Health (2004-2009), VP and Head of Commercial and Retail Banking Division at FIBI (2001-2003). Ms. Ralbag also served, among other things, as Acting Chairperson of the Board of FIBI Mortgages Ltd. for a period of 4 years, Acting Chairperson of the Board of Atzmaut Mortgage Bank Ltd. for a period of 4 years, a Director at Sarel Ltd., a Director at ARAM Provident Fund and as an external director since February 2015. He isat Hachsharat HaYishuv Insurance Ltd. Ms. Ralbag presently serves, among other things, as an external director of Clal Insurance Holdingsat Halman Aldubi Investment House Ltd. He was CEOand Golf & Co. Group Ltd. Ms. Ralbag holds a BA in economics and business administration and an MBA in public policy, both from the Hebrew University in Jerusalem.
Sagi Kabla. Mr. Kabla is the Chief Financial Officer of Israel Credit Cards Ltd., of Visa Alfa Ltd.,Corporation since December 2015. He serves as director in Bazan Group and of IDT Carmel Ltd. Hepreviously served as director on the boardsSenior Executive of Visa EuropeBusiness Development, Strategy and Visa International. HeIR in Israel Corporation. Prior to joining Israel Corp. he held various management roles in KPMG Corporate Finance. Mr. Kabla holds an MBA (Finance) from COMAS, B.A. in Economics and Accounting from Bar-Ilan University and was also chairmanqualified as CPA (Isr.).
Yoav Doppelt.Mr. Doppelt is, among others, Chairman of the boardBoard of Cellarix Mobile PaymentsOPC energy Ltd. and of Kneh Hacol Ltd. Mr. Dior is a member of the Friends Society of the Bar Ilan University. Mr. Dior is also a member of the public council of Alut – the National Association for Autistic Children,(TASE:OPCE) and a member of the AssociationBoard of FriendsDirectors of Meir Medical Center.Zim Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. He previously served as CEO of Kenon Holdings Ltd. (NYSE:KEN) and as an Executive Chairman of ICpower Ltd. as well as the Founder and CEO of the Ofer Group private equity fund. Mr. DiorDoppelt holds a BA in Economicseconomics and Political Sciencemanagement from the Hebrew UniversityFaculty of JerusalemIndustrial Management at the Technion and an MBA degree from Tel AvivHaifa University.

Dr. Miriam Haran. Dr. Haran serves as external director since September 2009. She served as director general of Israel’s Ministry of Environmental Protection. She is currently head of Ono Academic College’s MBA Program in Environmental Management and is a board member of M.A.I (Electrical and Electronic Waste Recycling). Dr. Haran served as a board member of the Company for Environmental Services (2008-2012) and as chairperson of the Consumer Council (2012-2014). Dr. Haran holds a B.Sc. in Natural Sciences from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem and a PhD in Organic Chemistry from Brandeis University.

Geoffrey Merszei. Mr. Merszei serves as director since February 2015. He serves as chairman of the Board of Zolenza AG, Switzerland. From 1977 to 2001 and from 2005 to 2013, Mr. Merszei served in a number of positions at the Dow Chemical Company, including as its executive vice president (2005 to 2012) and chief financial officer (2005 to 2009), during which time he also served on Dow’s board of directors (2005 to 2009). Mr. Merszei was CEO and chairman of the board of Dow Europe, the Middle East and Africa (2009 to 2012). In 2001 Mr. Merszei left Dow to be executive vice president and chief financial officer of Alcan Inc. in Canada, and returned to Dow in July 2005. Mr. Merszei has served as a lead director of the Dow Corning Corporation (2005 to 2010) and as a director of the Chemical Financial Corporation and Chemical Bank (2006 to 2010). Mr. Merszei previously served as an executive committee member of the European Chemical Industry Council (CEFIC) (2009 to 2012). Mr. Merszei holds a BA in Economics from Albion College, Michigan, U.S.A.


Shimon Eckhaus. Mr. Eckhaus serves as director since February 2015. He serves as the president of Worldwide Integrated Network Ltd. and also serves on the board of directors of Orbit Technologies Ltd. and AqWise Ltd. Mr. Eckhaus is a strategic and marketing advisor to a number of private and public companies. From 2009 to 2011, Mr. Eckhaus served as chairman of the board of Starling Advanced Communications Ltd. and as a member of the board of directors of the Israel Electric Company Ltd. and O.D.F Optronics Ltd. Mr. Eckhaus holds a B.Sc. in Materials and Process Engineering, including a specialization in Nuclear Engineering, and an M.Sc. in Materials and Process Engineering, both from Ben Gurion University.

189

The following table lists the names, ages and positions of our Executive Officers (who are not directors) as of the publication date of this report. The address for sending notices is c/o Israel Chemicals Ltd., 23 Aranha Street, Millenium Tower, Tel Aviv, 61070,6120201, Israel.

NameAgePosition
Raviv Zoller(1)
55 
Asher Grinbaum*67ActingPresident & Chief Executive Officer
Anat Tal-Ktalav(2)
50President, ICL Industrial Products Division
Charles M. Weidhas59Chief Operating Officer
Eli Glazer(2)
62President, ICL Innovative Agro Solutions Division
Ilana Fahima(3)
53Executive Vice President, Global Human Resources
Kobi Altman4850Chief Financial Officer 
Lilach Geva-Harel(4)
Charles M. Weidhas**57Chief Operating Officer
Nissim Adar***65President, ICL Essential Minerals
Ofer Lifshitz ***61Senior Vice President
Eli Glazer****61President, ICL Specialty Solutions
Lisa Haimovitz5142Senior Vice President, Global General Counsel
Miri Mishor(2)
55Senior Vice President, Global Information Technology
Noam Goldstein(2)
58President, ICL Potash Division
Ofer Lifshitz(2)
60President, ICL Phosphate Solutions Division
Rani Lobenstein47Senior Vice President, Corporate Relations
Amir Meshulam(5)
42Senior Vice President, Global Internal Auditor
(1)Mr. Raviv Zoller entered into office as CEO of the Company on May 14, 2018, replacing the Company's Acting CEO, Mr. Asher Grinbaum.
(2)Further to the structural adjustments of the Company's business segments (see Note 5 to our Audited Financial Statements), as of August 31, 2018, Mr. Noam Goldstein serves as President of the Potash Segment, Ms. Anat Tal as President of the Industrial Products Segment, Mr. Ofer Lifshitz as President of the Phosphate Solutions Segment, and Mr. Eli Glazer as President of the Innovative Ag Solutions Segment. In addition, as of August 31, 2018 Mr. Noam Goldstein, Ms. Anat Tal and Ms. Miri Mishor, SVP Global IT are considered executive officeholders of the Company.
190

(3)On November 1, 2018, Mrs. Ilana Fahima joined ICL as EVP, Global HR, replacing Mr. Yakir Menashe which assumed the position of EVP, Global Procurement as of such date. As of the date of her appointment, Mrs. Fahima is considered as an executive officeholder of the Company. Mrs. Fahima's terms of Compensation as well as her entitlement to the insurance, indemnification and exemption arrangements as are currently in effect for the Company’s Executive Officers, were approved by the Company's HR & Compensation Committee and Board of Directors on October 25, 2018 and October 31, 2018, respectively.
(4)On February 1, 2019, Mrs. Lilach Geva Harel joined ICL as SVP, Global General Counsel, replacing Ms. Lisa Haimovitz. As of the date of her appointment, Mrs. Geva Harel is considered as an executive officeholder of the Company. Mrs. Geva Harel's terms of Compensation as well as her entitlement to the insurance, indemnification and Corporate Secretary
Hezi Israel49exemption arrangements as are currently in effect for the Company’s Executive Vice President, ICL Corporate Development, M&AOfficers, were approved by the Company's HR & Compensation Committee and Strategy
Yakir Menashe45Executive Vice President, ICL Global Human Resources
Rani Lobenstein*****45DirectorBoard of Corporate RelationsDirectors on December 25 and 27, 2018, respectively.

*On 11 September 2016, our

(5)see C. Board Practices – Internal Auditor.
Raviv Zoller. Mr. Zoller entered office as ICL's President & CEO on May 14, 2018, following his appointment by the Board of Directors appointedon February 25, 2018. Prior to joining ICL, from 2008, Mr. Asher Grinbaum, who until 1 July2016Zoller served as Executive Vicethe CEO of I.D.I. Insurance Company Ltd. (“Bituach Yashir”), which is listed on the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange. In 1999, he founded Ness Technologies Inc., which began trading on NASDAQ in 2004 and served as its President and Chief Operating Officer, as Acting CEO of the Company, pending the appointment of a permanent CEO, after on 8 September 2016until 2007. Mr. Stefan Borgas gave notice of his decision to resign from office as CEO and Board member, due to personal reasons. Mr. Grinbaum’s appointment as Acting CEO became effective immediately (on 11 September 2016). Concurrently, the Board appointed a search committee for a permanent CEO, consisting of Mr. Johanan Locker (chairman of search committee), Dr. Miriam Haran and Mr. Avisar Paz.

**Mr. Charles M. Weidhas, previously CEO of ICL Industrial Products, replaced Mr. Grinbaum as Chief Operating Officer, as of 1 July 2016.

***Mr. Nissim Adar, President of ICL Essential Minerals, is expected to retire on 31 March 2017. He will be replaced in office by Mr. Ofer Lifshitz, who currently serves as Senior Vice President and who has recently headed ICL’s efficiency and cash flow improvement program.

****Mr. Eli Glazer, previously CEO of ICL Europe, took office as President of ICL Specialty Solutions as of 1 February, replacing Mr. Mark Volmer, who resigned from office on 31 January 2017.


*****On 7 July 2017 Mr. Rani Lobenstein was appointed as Director of the Corporate Relations Unit. Since his appointment, Mr. Lobenstein is considered a Company officer.

Asher Grinbaum. Mr. Grinbaum serves as Acting CEO since 11 September 2016. Since January 2008 and until 1 July 2016 he served as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer. He serves as director on the boards of Dead Sea Works Ltd., Rotem Amfert Negev Ltd., Dead Sea Bromine Company Ltd. and Bromine Compounds Ltd. – subsidiaries of the Company. He is a member of the board of trustees of the Ben Gurion University,Zoller voluntarily serves as chairman of the Be’er Sheva chess club, and was member of the board of the Israel Chemistry Society and chairman of the Chemistry Association and the Environmental Committee of the Israeli Manufacturers Association. In 2016Ethiopian National Project (ENP), a non-profit organization, since 2012. Mr. Grinbaum concluded his role as chairman of the executive committee of Be’er Sheva Theatre. Mr. GrinbaumZoller holds a BAB.A. degree in Mechanical EngineeringEconomics and an MBAAccounting from Tel Aviv University, and is a qualified CPA.

Anat Tal-Ktalav. Mrs. Anat Tal-Ktalav has been serving as president of ICL´s Industrial Products Division since August 2018. Mrs. Tal-Ktalav joined ICL in 1995 and served in various leading positions in the Industrial Products business segment, including Marketing Director of Flame Retardants, Vice President for Industrial Solutions (Bromine and Compounds Business Administration, bothLine), Deputy to the President of ICL Industrial products, and until recently, as the Executive Vice President of ICL Industrial Products. Mrs. Tal-Ktalav holds a degree in chemical engineering from Ben Gurion University.

Kobi Altman. Mr. Altman serves in his position since April 2015. Mr. Altman serves as director on the boards of Dead Sea Works Ltd., Rotem Amfert Negev Ltd., Dead Sea Bromine Company Ltd. and Bromine Compounds Ltd. – subsidiaries of the Company. Mr. Altman previously held several senior positions at Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. (2006-2015). Mr. Altman is a certified public accountant in Israel and holds a BA in Accounting and Economics from Bar Ilan University and an MA in Economics from Bar Ilan University.

Charles M. Weidhas.Mr. Weidhas serveshas been serving as Chief Operating Officer (COO) since July 2016. He previously served as CEO of ICL Industrial Products (2013-2016). Also serves as Chairman of TAMI IMI R&D Institute. Mr. Weidhas previously served and as CEO of ICL Performance Products (2007-2013), and. Prior to ICL he held managerial positions with Monsanto and Solutia. Mr. Weidhas holds a B.Sc. in Chemical Engineering and an MBA from Northeastern University.

Nissim Adar.

191


Eli Glazer. Mr. Adar serves in his position since October 2013, and is expected to retire on 31 March 2017. He previously served as CEO of ICL Industrial Products (2008 - 2013). Mr. Adar holds a BA in Chemical Engineering and an MBA in Industrial Management from Ben Gurion University.

Ofer Lifshitz. Mr. Lifshitz is expected to take officeEli Glazer has been serving as President of ICL Essential Minerals on 1 April 2017. Mr. Lifshitz, Senior Vice President, recently headed ICL’s efficiency and cash flow improvement program. He Joined ICL in 1996 and held numerous positions, among other Executive Vice President and BusinessICL´s Innovative Ag Solutions Division Director of Bromine Products and Compounds in ICL Industrial Products. In addition, Mr. Lifshitz served as Head of ICL China in 2002-2005. Mr. Lifshitz headed the integration of the YPH JV and was recently appointed chairman of the board of the JV and board member of Yunnan Yuntianhua. Mr. Lifshitz holds a BA in economics and an MA in industrial engineering from Ben Gurion University.


Eli Glazer. Mr. Glazer serves as President of ICL Specialty Solutions since 1 February 2017. He previously served as Senior Vice President and CEO of ICL Europe.August 2018. Mr. Glazer joined ICL in 1983 and has held numerous positions with the Company, including CEO of ICL Performance Products in Europe and Asia Pacific for a period of 5 years and CEO of ICL China for a period of 5 years. Before that, Mr. Glazer held various positions in ICL Industrial Products, including Business Division Director of Bromine Products and Compounds. Mr. Glazer holds a BA in economics and an MA in industrial engineering from Ben Gurion University

Lisa Haimovitz.University.

Ilana Fahima. Mrs. Ilana Fahima was appointed Executive Vice President, Global Human Resources, in November 2018. Prior to joining ICL, Ms. Haimovitz serves in her position since May 2009. SheFahima served as vice presidentVice President HR for strategyGlobal Quality and Head of Israel HR at Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. Before joining Teva, she held several positions at Maccabi Health Services, among them Regional HR Director and Regional Service Manager. Ms. Fahima holds a BA in Social Work and an MBA in Health Care Management, both from Ben Gurion University.
Kobi Altman. Mr. Altman has been serving as ICL CFO since April 2015. Mr. Altman previously held several senior positions at Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. (2006-2015). Mr. Altman is a Certified Public Accountant in Israel and holds a BA in Accounting and Economics from Bar Ilan University and an MA in Economics from Bar Ilan University.
Lilach Geva-Harel. Mrs. Geva-Harel entered office as SVP, ICL's Global General Counsel on February 1, 2019, following her appointment by the Board of Directors on December 27, 2018. Prior to joining ICL, from 2009, Mrs. Geva-Harel served as Senior Deputy to CEO and Head of Investments House's Headquarters of Psagot Investment House Ltd., as well as the general legal counsel. She previously served as a Partner in the Delek Group and has held a number of positions in the Israel Securities Authority. SheMerger & Acquisitions Department at Gross, Kleinhendler, Hodak, Halevy, Greenberg & Co Law Offices (GKH). Mrs. Geva-Harel holds an LLB and an MBALLM from Tel AvivBar Ilan University and is a member of the Israel Bar.

Hezi IsraelBar.

Miri Mishor. Mrs. Mishor has been serving as Senior Vice President, ICL Information Technology since 2014. Mrs. Mishor joined ICL in 1986 and served in various positions, including CIO of ICL Industrial Products and Vice President Information Systems of ICL Fertilizers. Mrs. Mishor holds a B.Sc. degree in Mathematics and Computer Science and a M.Sc. degree in Industrial Management from Ben Gurion University.
Noam Goldstein. Mr. IsraelNoam Goldstein has been serving as President of ICL´s Potash Division since August 2018. Mr. Goldstein joined ICL in 1986 and served in various positions in the Potash business division, including Vice President of Business Development, CFO in Europe, Vice President of Infrastructure, Senior Vice President Operations at ICL Dead Sea, and until recently, Executive Vice President Potash and Magnesium.  He also serves as chair of the environmental committee and as a board member at Israel´s Manufacturing Association. Mr. Goldstein holds a B.A. in his positionEconomics and Business Administration from the Hebrew University and a M.A. in Economics from Ben Gurion University. He is also a graduate of the Heschel Sustainability Leadership Fellowship Program.
Ofer Lifshitz. Mr. Lifshitz has been serving as President of ICL´s Phosphate Solutions Division since March 2012. HeAugust 2018. Mr. Lifshitz joined ICL in 1996 and served in various senior leadership positions including Executive Vice President of ICL Industrial Products,  Senior Vice President of Global Processes and as the company’s Integration Manager, Excutive Vice President for StrategySpecial Projects, and Business Developmentuntil recently, President of ICL Industrial Products. He serves as chairman of ICL Incubation. Prior to joining ICL, he held several positions in Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. (2000-2007). HeEssential Minerals Division. Mr. Lifshitz holds a BABachelor’s degree in Economics and Political Science and an MBA majoringa Master’s degree in Finance,Industrial Management, both from Tel AvivBen Gurion University.

Yakir Menashe.

192

Rani Lobenstein. Mr. Menashe serves in his position since March 2013. He servedLobenstein has been serving as Senior Vice President for Compliance & Regulatory Affairs and as assistant to the CEO of the Company. Mr. Menashe holds an LLB from the College of Management and is a member of the Israel Bar.

Rani Lobenstein. Mr. Lobenstein was appointed Director of the Corporate Relations Unit in July 2016.since 2017. Before Joining ICL in 2014, he served as chiefChief of staffStaff and senior advisor to the Director General of the Israeli Ministry of Finance (2002-2007). He served as CEO of ASIC, a subsidiary of the Israel Corporation, where he served as a member of management between 2008 and 2014. In addition, Mr. Lobenstein served as vice presidentVice President for strategyStrategy and regulatory affairsRegulatory Affairs in OPC Rotem between 2010 and 2014. Mr. Lobenstein holds a B.Sc. in economics and agriculture from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, and an MBA (financing) from the Israeli branch of Manchester University.

Family Relationships

There are no family relationships between any members of our executive management and our directors.

Arrangements for Election of Directors and Members of Management

There are no arrangements or understandings with major shareholders, customers, suppliers or others pursuant to which any of our executive management or our directors were elected.

B. COMPENSATION


Under the Israeli Companies Law and regulations promulgated thereunder (collectively, the "Companies Regulations" or “Compensation Regulations”), the compensation of directors must comply with the Company's compensation policy and requires the approval of the Human ResourcesHR & Compensation Committee, the Board of Directors and Shareholders,the shareholders, in that order. The Companies Regulations set minimum and maximum amounts of cash compensation, depending on the size of the company, or cash and/or equity compensation that are relativeat a certain ratio to that ofthe compensation paid to other directors who are not controlling shareholders or employed thereby and who are not employed by the Company (collectively, "Other Directors").
Directors who are employees ofoffice holders in Israel Corp. do not receive additional cash compensation for their services as directors. Instead, such fees are included in the annual management fees we pay to Israel Corp. pursuant to our agreement with them.


On November 8it. The management fees paid to Israel Corp. as of January 1, 2018, following the approval of the general meeting of shareholders from April 24, 2018, include, among other things, all compensation components, in equity (or the economic benefit thereof) and 11, 2015, our Human Resources & Compensation Committee andin cash, for the Boardservices of Directors, respectively, andCompany directors who are officer holders of Israel Corp.

At the Annual General Meeting of Shareholders on December 23, 2015 the General Meeting of Shareholders, approved(the "2015 AGM"), a proportionate compensation in accordance with the Companies Regulations, including a‘relative cash compensation to be paid to each of the directors (excluding directors employed by the Company or Israel Corp.)compensation’ for Non-Executive Directors (including external directors), who shall serve from time to time, atin accordance with Section 8A of the Companies Regulations  was approved, which consists of a fixed annual fee in the amount of NIS 365,000 (approximately $93,088 on the date of the shareholders' approval),$101,500) and a per meeting attendance fee in an amount equal to the lowest fee payable to external directors of companies of theICL’s size of ICL pursuant to the Compensation Regulations, as amendedadjusted from time to time. Such amount equaled (on the date of the shareholders' approval)time currently equals NIS 2,391 (approximately $610)(equivalent to approximately $665) per meeting for directors who do not meet the qualifications of an expert director and NIS 3,180 (approximately $811)(equivalent to approximately $885) per meeting for directors who meet the qualifications of an expert director. ItApproval was further approved byalso given for the authorized organsgrant of equity compensation in their meetings set forth above, as part of the proportionate compensation, to allocate 15,115 restricted shares to each ofat a fixed annual value. As per the directors (excludingshareholders' approval in the Chairman of the Board at the time Mr. Nir Gilad and the Company's CEO at the time, Mr. Stefan Borgas), for no consideration, as specified below. The aforementioned authorized organs further approvedextraordinary shareholders meeting that the directors employed by Israel Corp. and Mr. Aviad Kaufman will assign their restricted shares (or the economic benefit thereof) to Israel Corp. and that Mr. Aviad Kaufman will also assign to Israel Corp. the 9,078 restricted shares that were granted him pursuant to thewas held in February 26, 2015 General Meeting's approval. Furthermore, pursuant(and thereafter in the general meetings that were held on December 23, 2015, January 3, 2017 and January 10, 2018), we pay the same cash and equity based compensation to all of our Non-Executive Directors, whether or not they are external directors as further detailed bellow, all in accordance with the Compensation Regulations. Accordingly, any changes to the abovementioneddirectors’ compensation made from time to time, which require shareholder approval under Israeli law, including grants of additional equity based compensation, apply and will apply to all of our Non-Executive Directors, whether or not they are external directors (However, since the General Meeting, Mr. Aviad Kaufman has assigned the cash compensation paid him by the Company unto Millennium. Accordingly, 54,423 shares were allocated to Israel Corp. For further information on the fair value of the restricted shares, see Note 21 to our audited financial statements. On 29 March 2016, ourCompany's Board of Directors decided oncurrently consists of only one Other Director, the compensation currently paid to the external directors may not be changed as aforesaid, and therefore the annual equity compensation grant to our board members will be approved each year with equal value).
193

On May 15, 2018, the Company received a 5% reductionformal ruling from the Israeli Securities Authority (hereinafter "ISA") in response to the Company's application regarding the manner of implementation of the cashrelative compensation component for 2016mechanism with respect to external directors. According to the ISA's position, the Company acted lawfully in the manner of implementing the relative compensation to the Company's external directors, since the commencement of implementation of such mechanism in the Company.
As of February 13, 2018, Mr. Geoffery Merszei no longer serves as approved bya board member of the Company and therefore, as of that date, there is only one Other Director serving at the date hereof (Mr. Reem Aminoach). At the Annual General Meeting of Shareholders that was held on 23 December 2015,August 20, 2018, Dr. Nadav Kaplan was elected as wellan external director, and was informed at that date that he will be entitled to receive equal compensation as the other external director, Mrs. Ralbag, for as long as Mrs. Ralbag remains in her first term of office (i.e., until January 9, 2021). Upon conclusion of Mrs. Ralbag’s first term of office (i.e., as of the cash compensation component for 2017. Accordingly, the fixed amount paid to directors in 2016 amounted to NIS 346,750 (approximately $90,000).

On November 20 and 22, 2016,January 10, 2021), as per our Human ResourcesHR & Compensation Committee and Board of Director’s decision, Dr. Kaplan’s compensation will be reduced to the fixed annual and per meeting compensation amounts paid to director who has "financial and accounting expertise" as set forth in tables in the Israeli Compensation Regulations pursuant to the classification of the Company based on its shareholders' equity, and he will not be entitled to equity based compensation as well. Our HR & Compensation Committee and Board of Directors respectively,further resolved that as of such date, all Non-Executive board members that are entitled to compensation for their service as such, will receive the reduced compensation to be paid pursuant to the compensation tables in the Compensation Regulations, and on January 3, 2017, the General Meeting of Shareholders, approved anwill not be entitled to equity grantcompensation.

The Company also covers and/or reimburses its directors for 2017, allocation of 18,303 restricted shares to each of our directors (excluding the Chairmanexpenses (including travel expenses) incurred in connection with meetings of the Board Mr. Johanan Locker,and its committees or performing other services for the Company in their capacity as directors, in accordance with the Company's Compensation Policy and the Compensation Regulations. Our Board Members are also entitled to whom an equity grant was approved as detailed below), who serve from timethe Company's insurance, indemnification and exemption arrangements for office holders.
194

Equity Grants to time, for no consideration,Board Members:(1)
Grant for YearOfferreesAllocation Date
Type of Equity(2)
Dates of Organs' ApprovalsGrant Value (ILS)Grant AmountExceptions & Comments
2018    each of our directors who serve from time to time (excluding the Chairman of the Board)    10.1.2018    
restricted shares
 
HR & Comp.  Committee – 27.11.17
Board – 5.12.17
Shareholders (Annual GM) – 10.1.18
    
310,000    22,080    1.Our former board members, Messrs. Geoffery Merszei and Yaacov Dior, whose term of office ended on February 13 and 26, respectively, were entitled to 2,057 and 2,843 Restricted Shares, reflecting their entitlement to the relative portion of the 2018 Grant.
2.Dr. Miriam Haran, whose term of office ended in August 2018, was allocated 14,793 restricted shares.
3.
Dr. Nadav Kaplan was allocated 5,930 restricted shares on August 20, 2018.
4.Mr. Yoav Doppelt was allocated 758 restricted shares on December 12, 2018.
5.Messrs. Kaufman, Paz and Kabla waived in advance their entitlement to the equity compensation per 2018.
2019each of our directors who serve from time to time (excluding the Chairman of the Board & Office Holders of IC)1.1.2019restricted shares
HR & Comp. Committee & Board – 19.6.18
Shareholders (Annual GM) – 20.8.18
310,00014,623  
195

(1) The allocations are in accordance with the Company’s Equity Compensation Plan (2014), as amended in June 2016. Furthermore,
(2) The shares are subject to restriction pursuant to Section 15C of the aforementioned authorized organs approved that the directors employed by Israel Corp. and Messrs. Ron Moskovitz and Aviad Kaufman will assign their restricted shares (or the economic benefit thereof)Securities Law.
* On June 6, 2018, Mr. Lior Reitblatt gave notice to Israel Corp. and that Mr. Ron Moskovitz will assign the cash compensation paid him by the Company to Millennium. Accordingly, 54,909that he has independently purchased 58,850 shares were allocated to Israel Corp.of the Company on the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange, at a total amount of ILS 1 million. The total quantity of shares held by Mr. Reitblatt as of the date of this annual report is 95,553.
** For futherfurther information on the fair value of the restricted shares and vesting conditions, see Note 21 to our audited financial statements. The cash compensation for 2017 is the compensation determined by the General Meeting held on 23 December 2015, as specified above. As of the date of this report, the annual fixed sum amounted to NIS 365,000 (approximately $95,000), the per meeting attendance fee was set at NIS 2,391 (approximately $600) per meeting for directors who do not meet the qualifications of an expert director and NIS 3,180 (approximately $800) per meeting for directors who meet the qualifications of an expert director.

On March 14, 2017, our Compensation & Human Resources Committee and Board of Directors approved a 5% reduction out of the value ofAudited Financial Statements. For further details regarding the equity compensation component to the extent granted to our Non-Executive directors, forplease see the year 2018.


Mr. Johanan Locker serves as director as of 20 April 2016, and as Chairman of the Board of Directors (at a scope of no less than 90% of a full time position) as of August 15, 2016. Mr. Locker’s compensation terms were approved by our Compensation & Human Resources Committee and Board of Directors on April 19, 2016, and on 20 April 2016, respectively. Furthermore, a share-based payment (ESO) to Mr. Locker was approved by our Compensation & Human Resources Committee and Board of Directors on 16 May 2016 and on 17 May 2016, respectively (as part of the allocation to officers for the year 2016). The said terms were approved by the General Meeting of our Shareholders on 29 August 2016, as follows: (1) annual base salary of NIS 1,920,000 (approximately $500,000); (2) annual cash bonus according to ICL’s bonus plan and compensation policy. Mr. Locker’s target bonus in respect of 2016 was NIS 1,900,000 (approximately $500,000); (3) annual equity compensation framework at the amount of NIS 1,800,000 (approximately $470,000), as well as a one-time annual allocation of options exercisable into 186,335 ordinary shares and 55,215 restricted shares. The financial value of the said allocation is, as aforesaid, NIS 1,800,000 (approximately $470,000), half of which is attributed to the options and the other half to the restricted shares. The options and restricted shares will vest in three equal tranches as follows: one third upon the lapse of 12 months after the grant date, one third upon the lapse of 24 months after the grant date, and one third upon the lapse of 36 months after the grant date. Exercise of the option shall commence upon their vesting and conclude upon the lapse ofCompany's Proxy Statement dated July 7, years after the grant date; (4) Mr. Locker will be entitled to an advance notice period of 12 months and will be required to give the Company a 6 months advance notice in case he resigns. During such advance notice period Mr. Locker may be required to continue working for ICL and therefore Mr. Locker would continue to be entitled to all of his compensation terms, including annual bonus; (5) in addition, in case of termination of service, Mr. Locker will be entitled to a bonus equal to two times his last monthly salary multiplied by the number of years that he served as the ICL’s Executive Chairman; (6) Mr. Locker is entitled to all other cash and non-cash benefits payable to our senior executives pursuant to our policies in effect from time to time, including but not limited to, pension, study fund, disability insurance, company car, etc.

The total compensation granted to Mr. Locker by ICL for his actual period of employment in 2016 amounted to $450,000, and included the following: (1) basic salary at the amount of $208,000 for his actual period of employment (beginning on August 1, 2016); (2) ancillary payments for social benefits, severance pay, etc. at the amount of $80,000; (3) share-based payment (ESO) at the amount of $162,000. As detailed below, in accordance with the decision of our Board of Directors dated 14 March 2017, Mr. Locker was not granted an annual bonus for his actual period of employment in 2016, in spite of the fact that, pursuant to our compensation policy, he could have been granted an annual bonus for 2016.

2018 (Reference Number: 2018-02-067711).

The aggregate compensation amount granted to all of the members of our senior management (Global Executive Committee – GEC) as of December 31, December 20162018, was approximately $7.5$12.5 million for the year 2016. 2018.
196

The following table and accompanying footnotes describe the compensations granted for the year 20162018 to the five highest earning senior officers in ICL.


 Details of the RecipientPayments for services
NamePositionScope of
position
Holding in
equity

Base

Salary(1)

Compensation(2)Bonus(3)Equity based compensation(4)Total
  US$ thousands
Nir Gilad(5)(10)Executive Chairman of the Board until 15 August 201680%*5361,856-1842,041
Stefan Borgas(6)(11)Chief Executive Officer until 11 September 2016100%*7511,470-(233)1,237
Nissim Adar(7)(12)President, ICL Essential Minerals100%*366569-4731,042
Eli Glazer(8)(13)President, ICL Specialty Solutions segment, as of 1 January 2017100%*348528604431,030
Charles M. Weidhas(9) (14)Chief Executive Officer,ICL Industrial Products until 1 July 2016, and as of same date Chief Operating Officer100%*365684-3301,014

 Details of the RecipientPayments for services
NamePositionScope of positionHolding in equity
Base Salary(1)
Compensation (2)
Bonus(3)
Equity based compensation (4)
Total
  US$ thousands
Raviv Zoller (5)
President & CEO since May 14, 2018100%*4201,035
523(6)
4331,991
Johanan Locker (7)
Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors
90%*5347504925441,786
Charles Weidhas(9)
Chief Executive Officer, Industrial Products (COO) as of July 2016100%*379855350466
1,671
Asher Grinbaum (10)
Acting  CEO, ICL, between September 2016 to May 14, 2018100%*172477
909(11)
271,413
Kobi Altman(12)
Chief Financial Officer (CFO) as of April 2015100%*3915233674671,357
* Less than 1%
1%197

(1) The annual basic



(1)
The annual base salary for the officers in the above table was calculated according to their actual term of office in the Company in 2018.
(2)
The salary items (compensation) component set out in the above table includes all of the following components: gross salary, employer social benefits, customary social and related provisions, company car, relocation expenses, rent and indemnification for tax payments in case of relocation, payments during advance notice period pursuant to the terms of employment agreements, inasmuch as relevant, and reimbursement of telephone expenses. The compensation is in accordance with the Company's Compensation Policy.
(3)The bonuses to officer holders for 2018, including the top-five earners in 2018, were approved by our HR & Compensation Committee and Board of Directors on February 4 and 5, 2019, respectively. The bonuses approved are in accordance with the provisions of our Compensation Policy, unless otherwise specifically mentioned.
(4)The expense or income for the share-based payment component was calculated according to IFRS.
(5)
Mr. Raviv Zoller entered into office as the Company's President & CEO on May 14, 2018. Mr. Zoller’s terms of employment were approved by our HR & Compensation Committee and Board of Directors on February 22 and 25, 2018, respectively, and by the general meeting of our shareholders on April 24, 2018, and they are as follows: (a) annual base salary of NIS 2,400 thousand (approximately $670 thousand), indexed to the Israeli Consumer Price Index (CPI). Mr. Zoller's annual base salary as of December 31, 2018 is NIS 2,433 thousand (approximately $650 thousand); (b) annual cash bonus in accordance with ICL’s bonus plan and Compensation Policy. Mr. Zoller’s Target Bonus was set at NIS 2,500 thousand (approximately $695 thousand), with the maximum annual bonus set at the amount of NIS 3,750 thousand (approximately $1,040 thousand); (c) an annual equity compensation entitlement at the amount of NIS 4,000 thousand (approximately $1,110 thousand), as well as an annual equity grant for 2018 at a total amount of NIS 4,000 thousand (approximately $1,110 thousand), which was granted to Mr. Zoller upon his entry into office, comprising half of options exercisable into Company shares at a value of NIS 2,000 thousand (approximately $555 thousand), and half of restricted shares at a value of NIS 2,000 thousand (approximately $555 thousand). For details regarding the equity compensation granted to Mr. Zoller for 2018, see to the description of the equity compensation grants, set forth in the table and respective foot notes below; (d) Mr. Zoller will be entitled to an advance notice period of 12 months in case of termination by the Company (not for cause) and will be required to give the Company a 6 months advance notice in case he resigns. During such advance notice period Mr. Zoller may be required to continue working for ICL, and therefore Mr. Zoller would continue to be entitled to all of his compensation terms, excluding an annual bonus in respect of the advanced notice period and excluding an equity grant, to the extent granted during such advance notice period; (e) in addition, in case of termination of office,  Mr. Zoller will be entitled to an additional severances equal to his last his last base salary multiplied by the number of years that he served as ICL’s President & CEO; (f) Mr. Zoller is entitled to all other cash and non-cash benefits payable to our senior executives pursuant to our policies in effect from time to time, including but not limited to, pension, study fund, disability insurance, company car, etc., as well as the exemption, insurance and indemnification arrangements applying to the Company’s office holders.
(6)The annual bonus for 2018 to Mr. Zoller, as specified in the table above, reflects the outcome of implementation of the annual bonus formula as provided in the Company’s compensation policy and described in the “Annual Bonus” section below with respect to Mr. Zoller's actual term of office in 2018 (i.e. beginning May 14, 2018), as approved by our HR & Compensation Committee and Board of Directors on February 4 and 5, 2019, respectively.
198

(7)
Mr. Johanan Locker serves as director in the Company as of April 20, 2016, and as Chairman of our Board of Directors (at a scope of no less than 90% of a full-time position) as of August 15, 2016. Mr. Locker’s compensation terms were approved by our HR & Compensation Committee and Board of Directors on April 19, 2016, and on April 20, 2016, respectively, and by the general meeting of our shareholders on August 29, 2016, as follows: (1) annual base salary of NIS 1,920 thousand (approximately $535 thousand). Mr. Locker's annual base salary as of December 31, 2018 has not changed; (2) annual cash bonus according to ICL’s bonus plan and compensation policy – the target bonus was set at NIS 1,900 thousand (approximately $530 thousand); (3) annual equity compensation entitlement at the amount of NIS 1,800 thousand (approximately $500 thousand). For details regarding an additional equity compensation granted to Mr. Locker in 2018, see to the description of the equity compensation grants, set forth in the table and respective foot notes below; (4) Mr. Locker will be entitled to an advance notice period of 12 months and will be required to give the Company a 6 months advance notice in case he resigns. During such advance notice period Mr. Locker may be required to continue working for ICL and therefore Mr. Locker would continue to be entitled to all of his compensation terms, including annual bonus; (5) in addition, in case of termination of service, Mr. Locker will be entitled to an additional severances equal to his last monthly salary multiplied by the number of years that he served as ICL’s Executive Chairman; (6) Mr. Locker is entitled to all other cash and non-cash benefits payable to our senior executives pursuant to our policies in effect from time to time, including but not limited to, pension, study fund, disability insurance, company car, etc.
(8)
On February 4 and 5, 2019, our HR & Compensation Committee and Board of Directors approved, respectively, the annual bonus for 2018 to Mr. Locker, as further detailed in the “Annual Bonus” section below. In addition, at the same dates, the HR & Compensation Committee and Board of Directors, further resolved to grant a special bonus to Mr. Locker for 2018, in an amount equals to three (3) monthly salaries, or. NIS 480,000 (approximately $134 thousand). The special bonus is subject to approval of the general meeting of our shareholders, and thus is not reflected in the table above.
(9)
Mr. Charles Weidhas serves as Chief Operating Officer (COO) as of July 1, 2016. Mr. Weidhas’ employment contract is for an unlimited period and may be terminated by either party at any time by prior written notice. Mr. Weidhas is entitled to an advanced notice period and adjustment period of 6 months each and is entitled to life insurance and health insurance for himself and his family. Beginning on October 13, 2013, and for a period of 5 years thereafter, which was extended for an additional year by the HR & Compensation Committee and Board of Directors on October 25 and 31, 2018, respectively, Mr. Weidhas is entitled to reimbursement of his rent. As of March 2016, Mr. Weidhas’ monthly base salary is paid in U.S. dollars. As of 31 December 2017, Mr. Weidhas’ monthly base salary is approximately $30,468. Mr. Weidhas is also entitled, as long as he resides in Israel, to maintain the net amount in respect of all payments made to him as would be obtained in the United States (tax equalization). In addition to the amount provided regularly for pension fund and severance pay, Mr. Weidhas is entitled to additional severance pay equal to his last salary multiplied by the number of his years of employment with ICL in Israel. For details regarding Mr. Weidhas annual bonus for 2018, see the “Annual Bonus” section below.
199

(10)
Mr. Asher Grinbaum served as Acting CEO of ICL between September 11, 2016 and May 13, 2018. During his service as Acting CEO, Mr. Grinbaum’s terms of employment remained similar to the terms he had in in his previous position in the Company – Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer (COO). Mr. Grinbaum’s employment agreement (including amendments thereto), provided that Mr. Grinbaum’s base salary will be updated twice a year according to the rise in the Consumer Price Index in the months that passed since such previous update. According to Mr. Grinbaum's employment agreement and the salary updates pursuant thereto, as decided by our Board of Directors from time to time, Mr. Grinbaum’s monthly base salary, as of December 31, 2018, was NIS 137,774 (approximately $35,600). Mr. Grinbaum's annual base salary in the above table was calculated according to the actual term of office in the Company in 2018, i.e. the relative portion calculated until the last day in office, May 13, 2018. Subsequent to his retirement on May 13, 2018, and pursuant to his employment agreement, Mr. Grinbaum was entitled to an accrued vacation period, between May 14, 2018 and July 16, 2018, which was followed by a 6 months advanced notice period. In the course of the two periods thereof, employer-employee relations continued to apply, and ceased on January 16, 2019. The Company has booked full provisions respecting the base salary for the remaining period of 2018 already as of December 31,2017, as well as for the accrued vacation period, the advanced notice period and Mr. Grinbaum's retirement benefits, except for the Special Bonus, as defined herein below. Therefore, all amounts that have been previously recorded in 2017 are not included in the table above.
(11)
The bonus amount in the above table includes: (A) an annual bonus for 2018, in an amount of NIS 1,570,000 (approximately $440,000), that was calculated in accordance with the Annual Bonus Calculation Formula and the provisions of our Compensation Policy, following the approval of HR & Compensation Committee and Board of Directors on February 4 and 5, 2019, respectively. In respect of the accrued vacation period and the advanced notice period, no Specific Personal Measurables (KPIs) were applied. For further details, see the “Annual Bonus” section below; (B) a Special Bonus in an amount of NIS 1,800,000 (approximately $500,550), that was granted to Mr. Grinbaum in light of his exceptional contribution and remarkable efforts when serving as our Acting CEO, as further set forth in the Proxy Statement for the Company's Annual General Meeting that was held on August 20, 2018. The Special Bonus was approved by the general meeting of our shareholders on August 20, 2018, following approval by our Compensation Committee and Board of Directors on June 19, 2018, and on February 4 and 5, 2019, respectively. According to the Company's Compensation Policy, the maximum special bonus payout with respect to the CEO in any given year cannot exceed the difference between three base monthly salaries and the non-measurable components of the annual bonus payout. In addition, the maximum special bonus payout in any given year with respect to any Executive Officer cannot exceed 6 base monthly salaries. Therefore, the special bonus to Mr. Grinbaum was approved by the general meeting of our shareholders in a deviation from the Company's Compensation Policy, according to section 272(C) to the Israeli Companies Law.
(12)
Mr. Kobi Altman serves as ICL’s Chief Financial Officer (CFO) as of April 1, 2015. Mr. Altman’s employment agreement provides that Mr. Altman’s base salary will be updated twice a year according to the rise in the Consumer Price Index in the months that passed since such previous update. The employment contract is for an unlimited period and may be terminated by either party at any time by advance written notice. Mr. Altman is entitled to an advance notice period of 6 months. According to the employment contract and the salary updates, as decided by our Board of Directors from time to time, Mr. Altman’s monthly base salary, as of December 31, 2018, is approximately NIS 117,000 (approximately $31,215). In addition, Mr. Altman is entitled to all benefits customary in the Company, such as regular provisions for pension and severance, disability fund, company car, etc. Shortly after beginning his employment, in April 2015, Mr. Altman was granted a special equity grant (as a signing bonus) of 59,391 restricted shares, the value thereof at the grant date was NIS 1,600 thousand, which vested in April 2018.
200


The following table specifies the equity compensation details of each of the top-five earners among ICL’s senior officers, with respect to all equity compensation plans which the company had recognized an expense for in the above table was calculated accordingperiod of the report, i.e. as of the equity compensation grant for 2014. The allocations to their actual term of officethe top-five earners among ICL’s senior officers were made in the framework of annual compensation plans for Company in 2016. With respect to Mr. Nir Gilad, the basic salary was calculated up to August 2016. With respect to Mr. Stefan Borgas, the basic salary was calculated up to September 2016

(2) The salaryexecutives and salary ancillaries component set out in the above table includes all of the following components: monthly salary, social benefits, customary socialsenior employees, under which restricted shares and related provisions, company car, relocation expenses in case of transfer abroad, payments during advance notice period pursuant to the terms of employment agreements inasmuch as relevant, rent and reimbursement of telephone and newspaper expenses. Compensation is in accordance with our compensation policy.

(3) On 9, 13 and 14 March 2017 our Compensation & Human Resources Committee held discussions and approved the annual bonus to officersnon-transferable option warrants were allocated for 2016. On 14 March 2017 our Board of Directors decided, pursuant to the authority granted it by our compensation policy, that some of the officers, including our Chairman of the Board, Mr. Locker, and our Acting CEO,no consideration.

Year of grantApproval datesOffereeAllocation dateQuantity of option warrantsQuantity of restricted shares
NIS exercise price (subject to adjustments)
 
 
Quantity of valid option warrants as at February 20, 2019
Weighted economic value of each option warrant (4)
Fair value of restricted sharesExercise price of option warrantsShare priceQuantity of option warrants expired as at February 20, 2019Notes
On date immediately preceding allocation (NIS)as at February 20, 2019 (NIS)
2014 Raviv ZollerNA 
 Johanan LockerNA 
 Charles WeidhasSeptember 27, 201495,12922,25028.7163,4186.5728.0925.28920.231,711Exercise price of the option warrants is 25.2% higher than the share price on February 20, 2019; hence the option warrants are “out of the money”.
 
Asher Grinbaum(1)
September 27, 201495,12922,25028.7163,4186.5728.0925.28920.231,711
 Kobi AltmanNA 
2015Compensation Committee and Board: May 10 and 12, 2015, respectivelyRaviv ZollerNAExercise price of the option warrants is 27.8% higher than the share price on February 20, 2019; hence the option warrants are “out of the money”.
Johanan LockerNA
Charles WeidhasJuly 8, 2015137,36323,20027.7645,7874.5526.9425.82920.2    91,576
Asher Grinbaum(1)
July 8, 2015137,36323,20027.7645,7874.5526.9425.82920.291,576
Kobi AltmanJuly 8, 2015137,363
82,591(2)
27.7645,7874.5526.9425.82920.291,576
201

Year of grantApproval datesOffereeAllocation dateQuantity of option warrantsQuantity of restricted shares
NIS exercise price (subject to adjustments)
 
 
Quantity of valid option warrants as at February 20, 2019
Weighted economic value of each option warrant (4)
Fair value of restricted sharesExercise price of option warrantsShare priceQuantity of option warrants expired as at February 20, 2019Notes
On eve of allocation (NIS)as at February 20, 2019 (NIS)
2016Compensation Committee and Board: May 16 and 17, 2016, respectively. Respecting Mr. Locker, general meeting approval: August 29, 2016Raviv ZollerNAExercise price of the option warrants is 22.8% lower respecting Mr. Locker, 19.6% lower respecting Mr. Grinbaum and 22.2% lower respecting all others, than the share price on February 20, 2019, hence the option warrants are "in the money".
Johanan LockerAugust 29, 2016186,33555,21517.05186,3354.1915.4215.59520.2-
Charles WeidhasJune 30, 2016133,74739,63217.05133,7474.8316.315.71620.2-
Asher Grinbaum(1)
February 14, 2017114,06537,59217.22114,0655.8317.6916.23320.2-
Kobi AltmanJune 30, 2016145,54943,12917.05
85,549(5)
4.8316.315.71620.2-
2017Compensation Committee and Board: June 19 and 20, 2017, respectively. Respecting Mr. Locker, general meeting approval: August 2, 2017Raviv ZollerNAExercise price of the option warrants is 22% lower respecting Mr. Locker and 28.5% lower respecting all others, than the share price on February 20, 2019, hence the option warrants are "in the money".
Johanan LockerAugust 2, 2017164,91652,91016.49164,9165.4617.0115.74420.2-
Charles WeidhasJune 20, 2017128,62742,08915.31128,6275.1715.814.44820.2-
Asher Grinbaum(1) (3)
June 20, 2017128,62742,08915.31128,6275.1715.814.44820.2-
Kobi AltmanJune 20, 2017128,62742,08915.31128,6275.1715.814.44820.2-

202


Year of grantApproval datesOffereeAllocation dateQuantity of option warrantsQuantity of restricted shares
NIS exercise price (subject to adjustments)
 
 
Quantity of valid option warrants as at February 20, 2019
Weighted economic value of each option warrant (4)
Fair value of restricted sharesExercise price of option warrantsShare priceQuantity of option warrants expired as at February 20, 2019Notes
On eve of allocation (NIS)as at February 20, 2019 (NIS)
2018Comp Com & BoD - February 22 and 25, 2018, respectively, general meeting April 24, 2018Raviv ZollerMay 14, 2018384,615120,91915.76384,6155.1916.5415.38920.2-
Exercise price of the option warrants is 23.8% lower respecting Mr. Zoller, 12.5% lower respecting Mr. Locker and 29.7% lower respecting all others, than the share price on February 20, 2019; hence the option warrants are “in of the money”.
Comp Com & BoD - June 19, 2018, general meeting August 20, 2018Johanan Locker
August 20, 2018(6)
402,68547,24418.06402,6855.9619.0517.67920.2-
Comp Com & BoD – March 5 and 6, 2018, respectivelyCharles WeidhasMarch 6, 2018140,00043,89414.52140,0004.7515.1514.20520.2-
NA
Asher Grinbaum(1) (3)
NA
Comp Com & BoD – March 5 and 6, 2018, respectivelyKobi AltmanMarch 6, 2018140,00043,89414.52140,0004.7515.1514.20520.2-

203


(1) Mr. Asher Grinbaum will not be granted an annual bonus for 2016, despite the fact that, under the compensation policy, they could have been granted an annual bonus for 2016.

(4) The income or expenditure for the share-based payment component was calculated in accordance with accepted accounting standards (IFRS). Accordingly, tranches yet unvested or vesting upon the date of termination of employment with the Company of Messrs. Nir Gilad and Stefan Borgas, were forfeitedis subject to “Rule 75”, provided in the course of the reported period. In addition, with respect to Messrs. Eli Glazer and Nissim Adar, theCompany’s equity compensation framework for 2015-2016 included “Rule 75” (which provides that if the sum of an employee’s years of employment plus his age is 75 or more, thenplan, as amended in June 2016, whereby in case of termination of employer-employeeemployment relations, such employee is entitled also toand provided that the unvested equity component), and therefore they are entitled to the entire equity component allocated them within the framework of these allocations. 


(5) Mr. Nir Gilad served as our Chairmanyears of the Board since January 2008,offeree’s age plus his years of service with the Company equal or exceed 75, all option warrants and\or restricted share units and\or restricted shares allocated thereto and provided us with services within the frameworkyet to vest until termination of the management agreement entered between ICLemployment relationship shall become vested, and Israel Corp., and between May 2015 and 15 August 2016 served as our Executive Chairman of the Board, atmay be exercised into shares for a scope of 80% of a full time position. Mr. Gilad's compensation terms (in consideration of 80% of a full time position as aforesaid) were approved by our Compensation Committee and Board of Directors on May 10, 2015 and on May 12, 2015, respectively, and on June 29, 2015, by the General Meeting of our Shareholders, effective as of July 1, 2015, as follows: (1) Mr. Gilad's annual base salary was $800,000; (2) Mr. Gilad was entitled to an annual cash bonus based on ICL’s financial performance in the applicable year, in accordance with its annual audited consolidated financial statements and ICL’s compensation policy. Mr. Gilad’s target bonus in respect of 2016 was $720,000; (3) an annual equity compensation at the amount of approximately $950,000, as specified below; (4) Mr. Gilad was entitled to an advance notice period of 12 months while during such advance notice period Mr. Gilad would continue to be entitled to all of his compensation terms, including annual bonus; (5) in addition, Mr. Gilad was entitled to a bonus equal to two times his last monthly salary multiplied by the number of years that he served as the ICL’s Executive Chairman; (6) Mr. Gilad was entitled to all other cash and non-cash benefits payable to our senior executives pursuant to our policies in effect from time to time, including but not limited to, pension, study fund, disability insurance, company car, etc. The portion of Mr. Gilad’s equity component which has not vested untilfollowing the termination of employment shall be forfeited upon the termination of his employment.

(6) Mr. Stefan Borgas served as our Chief Executive Officer since 20 September 2012 and until September 11, 2016. Mr. Borgas’ last monthly base salary, as of 30 November 2016, was approximately $83,333. Mr. Borgas’ base salary was paid in NIS at the representative exchange rate on the 25th of each month and paid on the 1st of the subsequent month. In addition to his monthly base salary, Mr. Borgas was entitled to monthly participation in the cost of a residence, to coverageemployer-employee relations. The expense for the costvast amount of airplane tickets for two annual vacations in Europe for himself and for his family, and to participation in his medical insurance costs. Mr. BorgasGrinbaum's equity compensation was entitled to advance notice payment equivalent to 6 months’ salary. In addition to the amounts provided regularly for pension and severance, additional severance compensation for Mr. Borgas were calculated and paid on the basis of his last monthly base salary multipliedrecorded by the number of his years of employment with ICL. The portion of Mr. Borgas’ equity component which had not vested until the termination of employment was forfeited upon the termination of his employment.

(7) Mr. Nissim Adar served as President of ICL Fertilizers since 1 October 2013, and since May 1, 2016 as President of ICL Essential Minerals, and is expected to retire on 31 March 2017. Mr. Adar’s employment contract, as amended, provides that Mr. Adar’s base salary will be updated twice a year according to the riseCompany in the CPI in the months that passed since such previous update. The employment contract is for an unlimited period and may be terminated by either party at any time by prior written notice. Mr. Adar is entitled to a notice period of 6 months. According to the employment contract and the salary updates, as decided by our Board of Directors from time to time, Mr. Adar’s monthly base salary, as of 31 December 2016, is NIS 117,056 (approximately $30,000). Mr. Adar is entitled, in addition to regular provisions for pension and severance, to additional severance pay equal to his last salary multiplied by the number of his years of employment as CEO of ICL Industrial Products and CEO of ICL Fertilizers and ICL Essential Minerals.

(8) Mr. Eli Glazer served as Senior Vice President for Special Projects Head of ICL’s European Headquarters since 2016 and until 30 January 2017. As of 31 January 2017 he serves as President of ICL Specialty Solutions segment. Mr. Glazer’s employment contract is for an unlimited period and may be terminated by either party at any time by prior written notice. According to the employment contract and the salary updates, as decided by our Board of Directors from time to time, Mr. Glazer’s annual basic salary, as of 31 December 2016, is EUR 315,000. In addition, in 2016 Mr. Glazer was entitled to an annual sum of EUR 66,000 which includes residence expenses, children’s schooling, medical insurance and home leave. Mr. Glazer is also entitled to regular provisions for pension and severance.


(9) Mr. Charles Weidhas served as President of ICL Industrial Products since 1 October 2013 and until 30 June 2016. As of 1 July 2016 he serves as Chief Operating Officer, replacing Mr. Asher Grinbaum. Mr. Weidhas’ employment contract is for an unlimited period and may be terminated by either party at any time by prior written notice. Mr. Weidhas is entitled to an advance notice period and adjustment period of 6 months each and is entitled to life insurance and health insurance for himself and his family. Beginning on October 13, 2013 and for a period of 5 years thereafter, Mr. Weidhas is entitled to reimbursement of his rent. As of March 2016, Mr. Weidhas’ monthly base salary is paid in U.S. dollars. As of 31 December 2016, Mr. Weidhas’ monthly base salary is approximately $30,468. Mr. Weidhas is also entitled, as long as he resides in Israel, to maintain the net amount in respect of all payments made to him as would be obtained in the United States (tax equalization). In addition to the amount provided regularly for pension fund and severance pay, Mr. Weidhas is entitled to severance payment equal to his last salary multiplied by the number of his years of employment as President of ICL Industrial Products.

(10) On May 10 and June 1, 2015, and on May 12 and June 5, 2015, the Human Resources & Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors, respectively, approved among other things an allocation for no consideration of 404,220 options warrants and 68,270 restricted shares to Mr. Gilad, at a fair value of $485,021 and $461,615, respectively. The allocation was approved on 29 June 2015 by a special majority of our General Meeting of our shareholders. As of the date of this report, Mr. Gilad holds 404,220 option warrants and 68,220 shares of the Company. Option warrants and shares granted to Mr. Gilad and which have not vested by the date of termination of his employment with the Company shall expire upon the date of termination of his employment. The income or expenditure for the share-based payment component was calculated in accordance with IFRS accounting standards. Accordingly, tranches yet unvested or vesting upon the datetotal of termination of employment with the Company of Messrs. Nir Gilad and Stefan Borgas, were forfeited in the course of the reported period.

(11) On November 26, 2012, an allocation of 1,190,000 non-negotiable options, for no consideration, was approved for Mr. Stefan Borgas under our 2012 Option Plan. On December 30, 2012, the options were assigned to a trustee in Mr. Borgas’ favor. The options are exercisable into our ordinary shares at an exercise price of NIS 46.6 (approx. $12) (subject to adjustments). As of 31 December 2016, 785,400 of the options under the said 2012 plan have expired, and accordingly, 404,600 of the options are still valid. The weighted financial value of each option on the date of approval, was NIS 11.9 (approx. $3) for the first and second tranches, and NIS 12.7 (approx. $3) for the third tranche. The vesting price for converting the options into shares as of 9 March 2017 is NIS 40.7 (approx. $11), this price is 145% higher than the share price on this date (meaning, these options are “out of the money”).

On August 4, 2014 and August 6, 2014 our Human Resources & Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors, respectively, approved, and on December 11, 2014 the General Meeting of our Shareholders approved an allocation of 367,294 non-negotiable options for no consideration to Mr. Stefan Borgas, as well as 85,907 restricted shares. On December 11, 2014 the options and restricted shares were allocated to a trustee in Mr. Borgas’ favor. The options are exercisable into Company shares at an exercise price of NIS 28.71 (approx. $7) (subject to adjustments). As of December 31, 2016, 244,860 of the options were forfeited, and accordingly, 122,434 of the options are still valid. Furthermore, as of the said date, Mr. Borgas holds 28,635 restricted shares. The weighted financial value of each said option, at the date of approval, was NIS 6.57 (approx. $2). The fair value of the restricted shares, at the date of approval, was NIS 28.09 (approx. $7). The vesting price for converting the options into shares as of 9 March 2017 is NIS 26.12 (about $7.08), the share price on that day was NIS 16.59 (approx. $4.5). The exercise price of the options is 57% higher than the share price on this date (meaning, these options are “out of the money”).


On May 10 and May 12, 2015, our Human Resources & Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors, respectively, approved, and on June 29, 2015 the General Meeting of our Shareholders approved, an allocation of 530,356 non-negotiable options for no consideration to Mr. Stefan Borgas, as well as 89,574 restricted shares. On July 12, 2015, the options and restricted shares were allocated to a trustee in Mr. Borgas’ favor. The options are exercisable into Company shares at an exercise price of NIS 27.76 (approx. $7) (subject to adjustments). As of 31 December 2016, 353,566 of the options were forfeited, and accordingly, 176,790 of the options are still valid. Furthermore, as of such date, Mr. Borgas holds 29,858 restricted shares. The weighted financial value of each such option, at the date of approval, was NIS 4.55 (approx. $1). The fair value of the restricted shares, at the date of approval, was NIS 26.94 (approx. $7). The vesting price for converting the options into shares as of March 9, 2017, is NIS 26.66 (approx. $7.23), the share price on that day was NIS 16.59 (about $4.5). This price is 61% higher than the share price on this date (meaning, these options are “out of the money”).

On May 16 and May 17, 2016, our Human Resources & Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors, respectively, approved, and on August 29, 2016 the General Meeting of our Shareholders approved, an allocation of 625,466 non-negotiable options for no consideration to Mr. Stefan Borgas, as well as 185,337 restricted shares. On 5 September 2016, the options and restricted shares were allocated to a trustee in Mr. Borgas’ favor. The options are exercisable into Company shares at an exercise price of NIS 17.05 (approx. $4.5) (subject to adjustments). The said options were forfeited and the restricted shares were returned to the Company, to the shares registered in the name of the trustee, upon Mr. Borgas’ resignation from office.

The amount respecting share-based compensation to Mr. Borgas as specified in the table reflects income recorded by us in 2016 based on generally accepted accounting principles, for the optionswarrants and restricted shares allocated to Mr. Borgas, the portion thereof yet unvested upon the date of termination of employment of Mr. Borgas was forfeited or returned to the Company as aforesaid, upon the conclusion of his employment.

(12) On November 26, 2012, an allocation of 380,000 non-negotiable options was approved, for no consideration to Mr. Nissim Adar under our 2012 Option Plan. On December 30, 2012, the options were assigned to a trustee in favor of Mr. Adar. The options are exercisable into Company shares at an exercise price of NIS 46.6 (approx. $12) (subject to adjustments). The weighted financial value of each option, on the date of approval, was NIS 11.9 (approx. $3) for the first and second tranches, and NIS 12.7 (approx. $3) for the third tranches. The vesting price for converting the options into shares as of March 9, 2017, is NIS 40.7 (approx. $11). This price is 145% higher than the share price on this date (meaning, these options are “out of the money”).


On August 4, 2014 and August 6, 2014 our Compensation and Human Resources Committee and the Board of Directors, respectively, approved an allocation of 95,129 non-negotiable options for no consideration to Mr. Adar, as well as 22,250 restricted shares. On September 27, 2014 the options and restricted shares were allocated to a trustee in Mr. Adar’s favor. The options are exercisable into Company shares at an exercise price of NIS 28.71(approx. $7.5) (subject to adjustments). The weighted financial value of each such option, at the date of approval, was NIS 6.57 (approx. $1.7). The fair value of the restricted shares, at the date of approval, was NIS 28.09. The vesting price for converting the options into shares as of 9 March 2017 is NIS 26.12 (approx. $7.08), the share price on that day was NIS 16.59 (about $4.5). This price is 57% higher than the share price on this date (meaning, these options are “out of the money”).

On May 10 and May 12, 2015, our Human Resources & Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors approved an allocation of 137,363 non-negotiable options for no consideration to Mr. Adar, as well as 23,200 restricted shares. On July 12, 2015, the options and restricted shares were allocated to a trustee in Mr. Adar’s favor. The options are exercisable into Company shares at an exercise price of NIS 27.76 (approx. $7) (subject to adjustments). The weighted financial value of each such option, at the date of approval, was NIS 4.55 (approx. $1). The fair value of the restricted shares, at the date of approval, was NIS 26.94 (approx. $7). Rule 75, as aforementioned, applies to Mr. Adar. The vesting price for converting the options into shares as of 9 March 2017 is NIS 26.66 (about $7.23), the share price on that day was NIS 16.59 (approx. $4.5). This price is 61% higher than the share price on this date (meaning, these options are “out of the money”).

On May 16 and May 17, 2016, our Human Resources & Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors, respectively, approved an allocation of 145,549 non-negotiable options for no consideration to Mr. Adar, as well as 43,129 restricted shares. On June 30, 2016, the options and restricted shares were allocated to a trustee in Mr. Adar’s favor. The options are exercisable into Company shares at an exercise price of NIS 17.05 (approx. $4) (subject to adjustments). As Mr. Adar is expected to retire on 31 March 2017, only the first tranche will vest. The weighted financial value of each such option, at the date of approval, was NIS 4.83 (approx. $1.3). Rule 75, as aforementioned, applies to Mr. Adar. The fair value of the restricted shares, at the date of approval, was NIS 16.3 (approx. $4). The vesting price for converting the options into shares as of 9 March 2017 is NIS 16.67 (approx. $4.52), the share price at that time was NIS 16.59 (approx. $4.5).

The amount specified in the table reflects the aggregate expenditure recorded by us in 2016 with respect to the allocation of options and restricted shares to Mr. Adar,Grinbaum, based on generally accepted accounting principles.

 Mr. Grinbaum did not receive equity based compensation in 2018.

(13) On November 26, 2012, an allocation

 (2) Shortly after beginning his employment, in April 2015, Mr. Altman was granted a special equity bonus of 150,000 non-negotiable options59,391 restricted shares as a signing bonus, the value thereof at the time of such grant was approved, for no consideration for Mr. Eli Glazer under our 2012 Option Plan. On December 30, 2012, the options were assigned to a trusteeNIS 1,600 thousand, which vested in favor of Mr. Glazer. The options are exercisable into Company shares at an exercise price of NIS 46.6 (approx. $12) (subject to adjustments). The weighted financial value of each option, onApril 2018.
 (3) At the date of approval, was NIS 11.9 (approx. $3) for the first and second tranches, and NIS 12.7 (approx. $3.3) for the third tranche. The vesting price for converting the options into sharesthis allocation Mr. Grinbaum served as of March 9, 2017, is NIS 40.7 (approx. $11), this price is 145% higher than the share price on this date (meaning, these options are “outActing CEO of the money”).

On August 4, 2014Company, although this grant was made according to the compensation terms to which he was entitled in his previous position, as EVP and August 6, 2014 our Compensation & Human Resources Committee andCOO of the Board of Directors, respectively, approved an allocation of 45,874 non-negotiable options for no consideration to Mr. Eli Glazer, as well as 10,730 restricted shares. On September 27, 2014, the options and restricted shares were allocated to a trustee in Mr. Glazer’s favor.Company.

 (4) The options are exercisable into Company shares at an exercise price of NIS 28.71 (approx. $7.5) (subject to adjustments). The weighted financial value of each such option, at the date of approval, was NIS 6.57 (approx. $1.7). The faireconomic value of the restricted shares, atoption warrants is determined according to the date of approval,Black & Scholes model (except with respect to 2014, where it was NIS 28.09 (approx. $7.3). The vesting price for convertingdetermined according to the options into shares as of March 9, 2017, is NIS 26.12 (approx. $7.08)binomial model).
(5)
On November 4, 2018, Mr. Altman exercised 60,000 option warrants. The exercise price as at the date of the sale was NIS 15.97 (approximately $4.26), and the share price as at that date was NIS 21.86 (approximately $5.83). The amount of shares that derived from the exercise of the options and that was immediately sold reflected the difference between the exercise price and the share price at the relevant date (net exercise).
(6)On June 19, 2018, our HR & Compensation Committee and our Board of Directors, approved and on August 20, 2018, our general meeting of shareholders approved an issuance to Mr. Locker, of options in a total value of NIS 2,400,000 (approximately $662,983), comprising of NIS 900,000 (approximately $248,619) as in the previous year, and an additional amount of Options for 2018 in the amount of NIS 1,500,000 (approximately $414,365), and of restricted shares in a total value of NIS 900,000 ($248,619), as in the previous year.
For further details respecting the share price on that day was NIS 16.59 (approx. $4.5). This price is 57% higher than the share price on this date (meaning, these options are “out of the money”).

On May 10 and May 12, 2015, our Human Resources & Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors approved an allocation of 66,813 non-negotiable options for no consideration to Mr. Eli Glazer, as well as 11,284 restricted shares. On July 12, 2015, the options and restricted shares were allocated to a trustee in Mr. Glazer’s favor. The options are exercisable into Company shares at an exercise price of NIS 27.76 (approx. $7) (subject to adjustments). The weighted financial value of each such option, at the date of approval, was NIS 4.55 (approx. $1). The fair value of the restricted shares, at the date of approval, was NIS 26.94 (approx. $7). Rule 75, as aforementioned, applies to Mr. Glazer. The vesting price for converting the options into shares as of March 9, 2017, is NIS 26.66 (approx. $7.23), the share price on that day was NIS16.59 (approx. $4.5). This price is 61% higher than the share price on this date (meaning, these options are “out of the money”).

On May 16 and May 17, 2016, our Human Resources & Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors, respectively, approved an allocation of 70,911 non-negotiable options for no consideration to Mr. Glazer, as well as 55,982 restricted shares. On June 30, 2016, the options and restricted shares were allocated to a trustee in Mr. Glazer’s favor. The options are exercisable into Company shares at an exercise price of NIS 17.05 (approx. $4) (subject to adjustments). The weighted financial value of each such option, at the date of approval, was NIS 4.83 (approx. $1). Rule 75, as aforementioned, applies to Mr. Glazer. The fair value of the restricted shares, at the date of approval, was NIS 16.3 (approx. $4). The vesting price for converting the options into shares as of 9 March 2017 is NIS 16.67 (approx. $4.52), the share price at that time was NIS 16.59 (approx. $4.5).

The amountequity compensation plans specified in the table reflects the aggregate expenditure recorded by us in 2016 with respect to the allocation of options and restricted shares to Mr. Glazer, based on generally accepted accounting principles.

(14) On November 26, 2012, an allocation of 380,000 non-negotiable options was approved, for no consideration for Mr. Charles Weidhas under our 2012 Option Plan. On December 30, 2012, the options were assigned to a trustee in favor of Mr. Weidhas. The options are exercisable into Company shares at an exercise price of NIS 46.6 (approx. $12) (subject to adjustments) and will vest in three equal tranches beginning on November 26, 2013, 2014 and 2015. The weighted financial value of each option, on the date of approval, was NIS 11.9 (approx. $3) for the first and second tranches, and NIS 12.7 (approx. $3) for the third tranche. The vesting price for converting the options into shares as of March 9, 2017, is NIS 40.7 (approx. $10.6), this price is 145% higher than the share price on this date (meaning, these options are “out of the money”).


On August 4, 2014 and August 6, 2014 our Compensation & Human Resources Committee and the Board of Directors, respectively, approved an allocation of 95,129 non-negotiable options for no consideration to Mr. Charles Weidhas, as well as 22,250 restricted shares. On September 29, 2014 the options and restricted shares were allocated to a trustee in Mr. Weidhas' favor. The weighted financial value of each such option, at the date of approval, was NIS 6.57 (approx. $2). The fair value of the restricted shares, at the date of approval, was NIS 28.09 (approx. $7.3). The vesting price for converting the options into shares as of 9 March 2017 is NIS 26.12 (approx. $7.08), the share price on that day was NIS 16.59 (approx. $4.5). This price is 57% higher than the share price on this date (meaning, these options are “out of the money”).

On May 10 and May 12, 2015, our Human Resources & Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors approved an allocation of 137,363 non-negotiable options for no consideration to Mr. Charles Weidhas, as well as 23,200 restricted shares. On July 12, 2015, the options and restricted shares were allocated to a trustee in Mr. Weidhas favor. The options are exercisable into Company shares at an exercise price of NIS 27.76 (approx. $7) (subject to adjustments). The weighted financial value of each such option, at the date of approval, was NIS 4.55 (approx. $1). The fair value of the restricted shares, at the date of approval, was NIS 26.94. The vesting price for converting the options into shares as of 9 March 2017 is NIS 26.66 (approx. $7.23), the share price on that day was NIS 16.59 (approx. $4.5). This price is 61% higher than the share price on this date (meaning, these options are “out of the money”).

On May 16 and May 17, 2016, our Human Resources & Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors, respectively, approved an allocation of 133,747 non-negotiable options for no consideration to Mr. Weidhas, as well as 39,632 restricted shares. On June 30, 2016, the options and restricted shares were allocated to a trustee in Mr. Weidhas’ favor. The options are exercisable into Company shares at an exercise price of NIS 17.05 (approx. $4.5) (subject to adjustments). The weighted financial value of each such option, at the date of approval, was NIS 4.83 (approx. $1). The fair value of the restricted shares, at the date of approval, was NIS 16.3 (approx. $4). The vesting price for converting the options into shares as of 9 March 2017 is NIS 16.67 (approx. $4.52), the share price at that time was NIS 16.59 (approx. $4.5).

The amount specified in the table reflects the aggregate expenditure recorded by us in 2016 with respect to the allocation of options and restricted shares to Mr. Weidhas, based on generally accepted accounting principles.

For further details respectingabove, including the vesting and expiration dates of the options and/option warrants and\or restricted shares allocated as specified above,in each plan, see Note 21 ofto our 2016 consolidated audited annual statements.

Audited Financial Statements.

The Annual Bonus Component

Pursuant to our newcurrent compensation policy, as approved at a special meeting ofby the General Meeting of our Shareholders on August 29, 2016 (the “Company’s Compensation Policy”), a formula was established for the calculation of the annual bonus to our CEO and Chairman of the Board. With respect to our other officers, the new compensation policyCompany's Compensation Policy provides that the annual bonuses may be determinedcalculated by using financial metrics and/or measurable key performance indicators, as pre-determined by our HR & Compensation and Human Resources Committee and Board of Directors, by means of financial indicators and/or coefficients of meeting measurable targets (KPIs) and/or a qualitative evaluation.


With

On February 4 and 5, 2019, our HR & Compensation Committee and Board of Directors, respectively, approved an annual bonus to officer holders for the year 2018, including to the top-five earners in 2018 among ICL’s senior officers, in accordance with the Company’s Compensation Policy.
Pursuant to the Company’s Compensation Policy, the bonus formula for the CEO (the “Annual Bonus Calculation Formula”) is calculated according to multiplication of the CEO’s annual target bonus by the annual financial factor. The product of this multiplication is updated upwards or downwards according to the CEO’s satisfaction of measurable quantitative personal targets set in the beginning of the year (KPIs), at a rate of 50%, and according to a qualitative evaluation of the CEO’s performance made by the Board, at a rate of 50%. The CEO’s target bonus represents the complete satisfaction (100%) by the CEO of all annual targets. According to the Company's compensation policy, the CEO's target bonus may be up to 120% of his annual salary. Mr. Zoller's actual target bonus as determined in his employment agreement is NIS 2,500 thousand (approximately $667 thousand).
204

The annual financial factor is calculated by adding two “sub-factors”, each having a weight of 50%. The first sub-factor is the outcome of the reported adjusted net profit for the relevant year (subject to further adjustments, if any, as approved by the HR & Compensation Committee and the Board), divided by the average reported adjusted net profit in the three preceding years. The second financial sub-factor is the outcome of the reported adjusted operating profit for the relevant year (subject to further adjustments, if any, as approved by the Compensation Committee and the Board), divided by the average reported adjusted operating profit in the three preceding years. In 2018, no further adjustments were made by the Compensation Committee and the Board beyond those in this Annual Report to the reported adjusted net and\or operating profit, as reported in the annual financial statements. The adjusted net income and adjusted operating income are not calculated in accordance with IFRS, but are based upon net income and operating income, pursuant to IFRS, which are adjusted for certain items, as set forth in the Company's compensation policy. For details regarding the adjustments made to the Company's net and operating income in 2018, see "Item 5 - Operating and Financial Review and Prospects– A. operating results– Adjustments to Reported Operating and Net Income (Non-GAAP Financial Measures)".
The annual bonus amount for 2018 to our President & CEO, Mr. Raviv Zoller's, reflects the outcome of implementation of the Annual Bonus Calculation Formula with respect to the actual term he had worked in ICL in 2018, as approved by our HR & Compensation Committee and Board of Directors on February 4 and 5, 2019, respectively. Mr. Zoller's pro-rated target bonus for 2016, on March 9, 13the relative portion of 2018 or NIS 1,582 thousand (approx. $422 thousand), was multiplied by ICL's financial factor in 2018 (0.97), and 14, 2017 ourthen updated according to a good performance of his KPIs, as were determined in the beginning of 2018 for the former acting CEO, Mr. Asher Grinbaum and to an exceptional performance for qualitative evaluation of his performance. The HR & Compensation Committee and Board of Directors noted in their decision that Mr. Zoller successfully entered into the role of ICL's President & Human Resources Committee held discussionsCEO, while showing an impressive learning curve in understanding ICL's business, as well as leadership, capabilities and approvedinvolvement in the Company's business. Accordingly, the annual bonus payout to officersMr. Zoller for 2016. On March 14, 2017, our Board of Directors decided, pursuant2018, is NIS 1,958 thousand (approximately $523 thousand).
The annual bonus to the authority granted it by our compensation policy, that some of the officers, including our Chairman of the Board is calculated according to the Annual Bonus Calculation Formula (i.e., multiplication of Mr. Locker, our Acting CEO, Mr. Asher Grinbaum, our formerLocker's annual target bonus by the annual financial factor), however, the formula with respect to the Chairman does not include upward or downward updates according to the satisfaction of measurable quantitative personal targets and a qualitative evaluation. The Chairman’s target bonus represents the complete satisfaction (100%) by the Chairman of all annual targets. According to the Company's compensation policy, the target bonus of the Chairman of the Board, Mr. Nir Gilad,Johanan Locker, can amount to up to 120% his annual salary. Mr. Locker's annual target bonus for 2018, NIS 1,900 thousand (approximately $495 thousand), was multiplied by ICL's financial factor in 2018 (0.97). Accordingly, the annual bonus payout to Mr. Locker for 2018, is NIS 1,958 thousand (approximately $492 thousand). The total bonus payout to Mr. Locker for 2018, including the annual bonus and the special bonus, to the extent approved by the general meeting of our former CEO Mr. Stefan Borgas, President of ICL Essential Minerals, Mr. Nissim Adar and our Chief Operating Officer, Mr. Charles Weidhas,shareholders, will not be granted anNIS 2,323 thousand (approximately $620 thousand).
The annual bonus for 2016, despite2018 to ICL's former acting CEO, Mr. Asher Grinbaum was calculated according to the fact that, underAnnual Bonus Calculation Formula (i.e., multiplication of Mr. Grinbaum's annual target bonus for his previous position as COO by ICL's annual financial factor (0.97), and then update according to a good performance of his KPIs and to an exceptional performance for qualitative evaluation of his performance during the compensation policy, they could have been granted anterm he had served as acting CEO). In respect of the accrued vacation period and the advanced notice period, no Specific Personal Measurables (KPIs) were applied. The total bonus payout to Mr. Grinbaum for 2018, including the annual bonus and the special bonus for 2016

Our2018, as approved by the general meeting of our shareholders is NIS 3,370 thousand (approximately $909 thousand).

205

According to the resolution of the HR & Compensation & Human Resources Committee and our Board of Directors, approved granting Mr. Eli Glazer anfor purposes of determining the annual bonuses for 2018, the Annual Bonus Calculation Formula was applied also to the Company's officers, including Messrs. Weidhas and Altman, as follows:
The annual bonus atto Mr. Weidhas was calculated according to the amountAnnual Bonus Calculation Formula as aforesaid. The outcome of $60,000multiplying Mr. Weidhas' target bonus with ICL's financial factor (0.97) was updated according to a good performance of his KPIs and to a good qualitative evaluation of his performance.
The annual bonus to Mr. Altman was calculated according to the Annual Bonus Calculation Formula as aforesaid. The outcome of multiplying Mr. Altman' target bonus with ICL's financial factor (0.97) was updated according to a good performance of his KPIs and to a good qualitative evaluation of his performance.
Pension, Retirement and Similar Benefits
The annual provision of the Company for the period during which he served as Senior Vice Presidentpension or other retirement benefits for Special Projects and Head of ICL’s European Headquartersour senior management (GEC) in 2016, in accordance with the discretion granted2018 amounted to our Compensation & Human Resources Committee and our approximately $1 million.
C. BOARD PRACTICES
Board of Directors under our compensation policy, as aforesaid.


C. BOARD PRACTICES

Board of Directors

According to our Articles of Association, we must have no less than seven and no more than twenty directors. Our directors are normally elected by our shareholders at our annual meeting. Our Board of Directors is also authorized to appoint directors in order to fill vacancies or for any other reason. Each of our directors, other than our external directors, serves from the date of election or appointment until our next annual meeting of the shareholders. According to our Articles of Association, a majority of the members of our Board must be both citizens and residents of Israel. The approval of at least a majority of the voting rights represented at a shareholders’ meeting and voting on the matter is generally required to remove any of our directors from office (other than external directors as detailed below).

As of the date of this Annual Report, our Board of Directors consists of nineten directors. In the event of equal votes of our Board of Directors, our Chairman of the Board has the right to cast the deciding vote. Mr. Lior Reitblatt is an independent director, as defined in the Israeli Companies Law, 5759-1999 (the “Companies Law”). Board members Ms. Ruth Ralbag, Messrs. Yaacov Dior, Miriam Haran, Geoffrey MerszeiNadav Kaplan, Reem Aminoach and Shimon EckhausLior Reitblatt are independent directors under the rules applicable to U.S. companies listed on the NYSE. Board members Messrs. Johanan Locker, Avisar Paz, Aviad Kaufman, Sagi Kabla, and Ovadia Eli and Yoav Doppelt are not considered independent directors by virtue of the positions they hold with our controlling shareholdershareholder's group or with the Company. Two of our directors, Messrs. Yaacov Dior and Dr. Miriam HaranNadav Kaplan Ms. Ruth Ralbag are “external directors” according to the Companies Law. We do not have service contracts with our current directors, excluding our Executive Chairman of the Board, Mr. Johanan Locker.

206


External Directors

As a public Israeli company, we are required by the Israeli Companies Law to have at least two external directors who meet certain independence criteria to ensure that they are not related parties to the Company or to our controlling shareholder. The definition of “external director” under the Companies Law and the definition of “independent director” under the NYSE rules are very similar, and thus that we would generally expect a director who qualifies as one to also qualify as the other. However, since the definitions provided in Israeli law and U.S. law are not identical, it is possible for a director to qualify as one but not necessarily as the other.

An external director is required to have either financial and accounting expertise or professional qualifications, as defined in the relevant regulations promulgated under the Companies Law, and at least one of the external directors is required to have financial and accounting expertise. Our external director, Mr. Yaacov Dior, hasdirectors, Ms. Ruth Ralbag and Dr. Nadav Kaplan, have financial and accounting expertise as defined in the Regulations. An external director is entitled to reimbursement of expenses and compensation as provided in the Regulations promulgated under the Companies Law but is otherwise prohibited from receiving any other compensation from us, directly or indirectly, during his term of office and for two years thereafter.


Under the Companies Law, external directors must be elected at a shareholders’ meeting by a simple majority of the votes cast, provided that any of the following conditions is met: that such majority includes a majority of the votes cast by non-controllingnon‑controlling shareholders and shareholders who do not have a personal interest in the election (excluding a personal interest that did not result from the shareholder’s relationship with the controlling shareholder), or that the votes cast by such shareholders opposing the election did not exceed 2% of our aggregate voting rights. Generally, external directors serve for up to three terms of three years each, and our Audit and Accounting Committee and Board of Directors may nominate them for additional terms under certain circumstances. Even if an external director is not nominated by our Board of Directors for reelection for a second or third term, shareholders holding at least 1% of our voting rights have the right to nominate the external director for reelection, and in addition, the external director may nominate himself for reappointment. In such a case, the reelection can be approved without the approval of our controlling shareholder if it is approved by a majority of the votes cast by non-controllingnon‑controlling shareholders and shareholders who do not have a personal interest in the election (excluding a personal interest that did not result from the shareholder’s relationship with the controlling shareholder) and the votes cast by such shareholders approving the election exceed 2% of our aggregate voting rights. The term of office of an external director may be terminated prior to expiration only by a shareholder vote, by the same threshold required for election, or by a court, but in each case only if the external director ceases to meet the statutory qualifications for election or if the external director breaches his duty of trust to us.

Under the Companies Law, all external directors must be members of the company’s audit committeeCompany’s Audit Committee and compensation committee,Compensation Committee, as further detailed below.

As of the date of this report, we have two external directors: Mr. Yaacov Dior,Ms. Ruth Ralbag, whose secondfirst term commenced on February 26, 2015,January 10, 2018 and Dr. Miriam Haran,Nadav Kaplan, whose thirdfirst term commenced on August 20, 2018. On February 26, 2018, Mr. Yaacov Dior ceased serving as an external director of the Company, after completing two three-year terms in the Company and on August 29, 2015.

2018, Dr. Miriam Haran ceased serving as an external director of the Company, after completing three three-year terms in the Company.

207

Financial Experts

Our Board of Directors has resolved that at least three of its members must have financial and accounting expertise, as this term is defined in the Regulations promulgated under the Companies Law. Our Board of Directors has determined that, based on qualification statements delivered to the Company, seven out of our nineten serving directors meet the said expertise requirements.

In addition, our Board of Directors has determined that all members of our Audit and Accounting Committee are financially literate for purposes of meeting the NYSE rules and that Mr. DiorMs. Ralbag and Mr. MerszeiMessrs. Kaplan and Reitblatt are qualified to serve as “audit committee financial experts”“Audit Committee Financial Experts” as defined by SEC rules.

Alternate Directors

Our Articles of Association, consistent with Israeli law, provide that any director may appoint another person who is not a director or an otheranother director to serve as his alternate director, subject to the approval of the Board of Directors. The term of an alternate director can be terminated at any time by the appointing director or the Board of Directors and automatically terminates upon the termination of the term of the appointing director. The Companies Law stipulates that an external director may not appoint an alternate director except under very limited circumstances. An alternate director has the same rights and responsibilities as a director, except for the right to appoint an alternate director. No alternate director was appointed during the reported period.


Our Board Committees

Our Board of Directors has established the following Committees, which operate in accordance with written charters or procedures that set forth, among other things, such committee’s structure, manner of operations, qualification and membership requirements, responsibilities and authority of the committee, etc.

Audit and Accounting Committee

Under the Companies Law, the boardBoard of directorsDirectors of a public company must establish an audit committee.Audit Committee. The audit committeeAudit Committee must consist of at least three directors who meet certain independence criteria and must include all of the company’sCompany’s external directors. The chairmanChairman of the audit committeeAudit Committee is required to be an external director. The responsibilities of an audit committeeAudit Committee under the Companies Law include identifying and addressing flaws in the business management of the company,Company, reviewing and approving interested party transactions, establishing whistleblower procedures, overseeing the company’sCompany’s internal audit system and the performance of its internal auditor,Internal Auditor, and assessing the scope of the work and recommending the fees of the company’sCompany’s independent accounting firm. In addition, the audit committeeAudit Committee is required to review and determine whether certain actions and transactions with a controlling shareholder ofor with a company officer are “material” or “extraordinary” and whether they are negligible according to the approval procedures required under the Companies Law and company procedures.

In accordance with U.S. law and the NYSE requirements, our Audit and Accounting Committee is also responsible for the appointment, compensation and oversight of the work of our independent auditors. In accordance with such laws and rules and with the Israeli Companies Law and regulations promulgated thereunder, the Audit and Accounting Committee is also responsible for assisting our Board of Directors in monitoring our financial statements, the effectiveness of our internal controls and our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements.

208

As of the date of this report, our Audit and Accounting Committee consists of three directors, and also includes our two external directors: Mr. Yaacov Diordirectors and our independent director, as follows: Ms. Ruth Ralbag (Chairman, external director), Dr. Miriam HaranNadav Kaplan (external director) and Mr. Geoffrey Merszei.Lior Reitblatt (independent director). In addition to meeting the requirements of Israeli law, our Audit and Accounting Committee also complies with the requirements applicable to U.S. companies that are listed on the NYSE and with SEC rules. All Committee members are also independent directors as this term is defined in SEC rules and the NYSE listing requirements. Our Board of Directors has determined that all the members of the Audit and Accounting Committee are financially literate as provided in the NYSE rules and that Mr. DiorMs. Ralbag and Mr. MerszeiMessrs. Kaplan and Reitblatt are qualified to serve as “audit committee financial experts” as defined by SEC rules.


Human Resources and Compensation Committee

Under the Companies Law, the boardBoard of directorsDirectors of a public company must establish a compensation committee.Compensation Committee. The compensation committeeCompensation Committee must consist of at least three directors who meet certain independence criteria and include all of the company’sCompany’s external directors, who are required to constitute a majority of its members. The chairmanChairman of the compensation committeeCompensation Committee must be an external director. The members of the compensation committeeCompensation Committee are remunerated for their service in accordance with the regulations governing the compensation of external directors. The responsibilities of a compensation committeeCompensation Committee under the Companies Law include: recommending to the boardBoard of directorsDirectors a policy governing the compensation of company officers based on specified criteria, recommending to the boardBoard of directors,Directors, from time to time, to update such compensation policy and reviewing its implementation; deciding whether to approve transactions respecting the terms of office and employment of officers which require approval by the compensation committee, including exemption from approval by the general meeting,General Meeting, in accordance with the provisions of the Companies Law.

Our Compensation and Human ResourcesHR &Compensation Committee is also charged, according to Company policy, with oversight of our human resources strategy and key programs, such as our “One ICL” program, senior leadership development,oversees the bonus and equity plans, evaluation of top management and employees, succession planning and so forth.

Our HR & Compensation and Human Resources Committee consists of three directors and includes outour two external directors:directors and our independent director, as follows: Dr. Miriam Haran (Chairperson,Nadav Kaplan (Chairman, external director), Mr. Yaacov DiorMs. Ruth Ralbag (external director), and Mr. Shimon Eckhaus.Lior Reitblatt (independent director). All Committee members are also independent directors as this term is defined in the NYSE listing requirements and SEC rules.

Environment, Safety and Public Affairs Committee

Our Environment, Safety and Public Affairs Committee is not a statutory committee, and is designed to assist our Board of Directors in fulfilling its responsibilities respecting oversight of our environment and safety policies and programs, our community outreach programs and public relations and advocacy. Our Environment, Safety and Public Affairs Committee is not authorized to exercise any power of our Board of Directors. It consists of four directors: Mr. Shimon EckhausReem Aminoach (Chairman), Dr. Miriam Haran,Nadav Kaplan, Mr. Ovadia Eli and Mr. Sagi Kabla.

209

Operations Committee

Our Operations Committee is not a statutory committee, and is designed to assist our Board of Directors in fulfilling its responsibilities with respect to our equity management, business operations and strategy implementation, including reviewing M&A transactions and research and development strategy. Our Operations Committee is not authorized to exercise any power of our Board of Directors. The committee consists of six directors: Mr. Johanan Locker (Chairman), Mr. Avisar Paz, Mr. Sagi Kabla, Mr. Ovadia Eli, Mr. Geoffrey MerszeiReem Aminoach and Mr. Shimon Eckhaus.

Lior Reitblatt.

Financing Committee

Our Financing Committee is not a statutory committee, and its purpose is to assist our Board of Directors in fulfilling its responsibilities with respect to our financing and equity management and operations, including loans, equity offerings, hedging, debt and other financing vehicles. Our Financing Committee is not authorized to exercise any power of our Board of Directors. The committeeAs of the date of this report, the Committee consists of fivefour directors: Mr. Avisar Paz (Chairman), Mr. Yaacov Dior, Mr. Sagi Kabla, Mr. Aviad Kaufman and Mr. Geoffery Merszei.

Ms. Ruth Ralbag.

Internal Auditor

Under the Companies Law, a company’s boardCompany’s Board of directorsDirectors is required to appoint an internal auditorInternal Auditor pursuant to the recommendation of the audit committee.Audit Committee. The role of the internal auditorInternal Auditor is to examine, among other things, whether the company’sCompany’s actions comply with applicable law, company procedures and proper business procedures. Under the Companies Law, the internal auditorInternal Auditor may not be an interested party, a director or an officer of the company, or a relative of any of the foregoing, nor may the internal auditorInternal Auditor be the company’s independent accountant or a representative thereof. The chief internal auditorInternal Auditor oversees the work of various internal auditors acting on his behalf throughout the organization. As of the time of this report, our Chief Internal Auditor is Mr. Shmuel Daniel, who isAmir Meshulam, a certified Internal Auditor and certified public accountant in Israel. The chief internal auditor servesIsrael, holds an LLB from the College of Management and is a member of the Israel Bar. Mr. Meshulam has served in this position since August 1,2018, replacing Mr. Shmuel Daniel, who served as our previous internal auditor since August 2014, for a periodand has left on retirement. Mr. Meshulam appointment was approved by the Board of three years.

Director's on May 9, 2018, after receiving the Audit Committee's recommendation from May 8, 2018.

Insurance and indemnification

The Articles of Association of the Company and its Israeli subsidiaries include provisions that permit exemption, indemnification and insurance of the liability of officers, all in accordance with the provisions of the Israeli Companies Law.

(1)The Articles of Association of the Company and its Israeli subsidiaries include provisions that permit exemption, indemnification and insurance of the liability of officers, all in accordance with the provisions of the Israeli Companies Law.
The Company, with the approval of the AuditHR & Compensation Committee, the Board of Directors and the General Meeting of the shareholders, granted its officers an exemption and letters of indemnification, and has also taken outhas an insurance policy covering directors and officers. The insurance and the indemnity do not apply to those cases specified in Section 263 of the Israeli Companies Law. The exemption relates to damage caused and/or will be caused, by those officers as a result of a breach of the duty of care to the Company. Commencing from the date of registration of the Company’s shares for trading in the United States, theThe amount of the indemnification payable by the Company under the letter of indemnification, in addition to amounts received from an insurance company, if any, for all of the officers on a cumulative basis, for one or more of the events detailed therein, wasis limited to $350 million ($300 millionmillion. The insurance is renewed annually.
210

On September 14, 2017, our shareholders approved the Company's engagement in directors and officers insurance policies, as a three-year framework agreement. The insurance policies under the framework agreement include a joint primary tier with Israel Corp. with a joint liability cap of up to $20 million, and a separate tier covering the dateCompany alone, with a liability cap of registrationup to $200 million, for a total liability limit of $220 million for both tiers. Under the terms of the Company’s shares for trading in the United States).

On 13 October 2015, we renewed the insurance policy relating toframework resolution, our directors and officers currently in service with the Company or those who will serve with the Company from time to time, as well relating to their liability in their offices in certain companies to which they have been or will be appointed to by the ICL Group, valid asare beneficiaries of 1 September 2015 and until 31 August 2016. On 4 August and 9 August 2016, our Compensation Committee and Board of directors have approved, respectively, renewal of the insurance policy for a period of an additional year, valid as of 1 September 2016 and until 31 August 2017.both tiers. Pursuant to the current policy,framework agreement, the division of the premium amount between the Company and Israel CorporationCorp. in the joint tier was set, sois that 70% willare to be paid by the Company and 30% by the Israel Corporation,Corp. According to the approval of the general meeting of our shareholders, the HR & Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors will have the authority to approve changes from time to time in accordanceconnection with the termsrate of the framework resolution. The insurance policy includes a first joint tier with Israel Corporation with a joint liability limit up to $20 million per occurrence and in the aggregate, and a second and separate tier that covers officers' liability inpremium distribution between the ICL Group alone for additional up to $200 million per occurrence and in the aggregate (the total policy amounts to $220 million). According to the framework resolution, the officers of the ICL group are beneficiaries of both tiers. As part of the said approvals, an annual premium was approved which will be paid by the CompanyIsrael Corporation Group in respect of the aforementioned policy; it doesjoint tier, as recommended by the insurers and/or brokers, provided that the new rate of the premium distribution will not exceed 25% over the entire transaction period. Deviation from these limits shall require the shareholders approval. On December 4 and 5, 2017, the Audit & Accounting Committee and Board of Directors approved the renewal of the insurance policy, on the basis of the framework agreement, for an additional year beginning on January 1, 2018, and until December 31, 2018, with an annual premium of $900,000, which is within the maximum premium amount specified in the framework resolution.

On January 3 and 7, 2019, our Audit & Accounting Committee and Board of Directors approved the renewal of the insurance policy for 2019, according to the framework agreement, with a limit of $205 million, additional coverage Side A (directors only) limit of $20 million (as approved by our Audit & Accounting Committee on June 19, 2018 and December 10, 2018 and by the Board on June 19, 2018 and December 12, 2018) and a total premium of up to $1,400,000. This amount (including the Side A premium), does not exceed the maximum premium amount pursuant to the framework agreement. The allocation of the premium distribution between ICL and Israel Corp was revised to 80% ICL and 20% Israel Corp.
The terms of the new policy adhere to the terms of the framework resolution and of the Company's Compensation Policy. The coverage in effect as of the date of this report (including a shared tier with the parent company of up to $20 million) is at an aggregate amount of $220 million.


Other Information

We did not engage in any arrangements with directors providing for benefits upon termination of employment, with the following exception:exceptions: (1) in case of termination of employer-employee relations, Mr. Johanan Locker will be entitled to a bonus at an amount equal two times his last monthly salary, multiplied by the number of his years of service as ICL’s Executive Chairman of the Board.

Board, and (2) In accordance with the Equity Plan, the board members' vesting of the Restricted Shares would fully accelerate if the holder thereof ceases to serve as a director of the Company, unless he ceased to hold office due to those certain circumstances regarding early termination of office or imposition of enforcement measures, as set forth in section 231-232a and 233(2) of the Israeli Companies Law.

Number of meetings and average attendance rate of the ICL Board and its permanent committees
 
Number of meetings in
reported year
Average Attendance
General Board Meetings1697%
Audit & Accounting Committee1391%
Financing Committee4100%
Operations Committee492%
Compensation Committee11100%
Environment Committee494%

211

D. EMPLOYEES

As ofat December 31, 2016,2018, we had a workforce of 13,41412,125 employees. Of these, 81 were employed at our headquarters and the balance were employed by our various subsidiaries.

Breakdown of Employees by Segments

 201620152014
Essential Minerals 6,932 7,3085,456
Specialty Solutions 5,027 5,2334,728
Global functions and headquarters

1,455

1,509

2,273

Total employees

13,414

14,050

12,457

    

201820172016
Phosphate Solutions 5,259 5,533 6,274
Potash 2,855 3,109 3,196
Industrial Products 1,675 1,697 1,710
Innovative Ag Solutions 1,182 1,163 1,081
Global functions and headquarters 1,154 1,158 1,253
Total employees 12,125 12,660 13,514

Geographic Breakdown of Employees

 201620152014
Israel 4,761 4,8124,940
China 2,816 3,057614
Spain 1,294 1,3001,270
Germany 1,157 1,1701,539
UK 827 1,1621,203
USA 1,021 1,1421,123
Netherlands 639 576494
Brazil 264 249234
France 127 120343
Other

508

462

697

Total employees

13,414

14,050

12,457

    

201820172016
Israel 4,672 4,673 4,861
China 2,467 2,413 2,816
Spain 1,179 1,281 1,294
Germany 860 1,012 1,157
UK 659 836 827
USA 728 817 895
Netherlands 627 626 639
Brazil 276 280 264
France 125 125 127
Other 532 597 634
Total employees 12,125 12,660 13,514

As at December 31, 2016,2018, the Company’s workforce comprised of 13,41412,125 employees, compared to 14,05012,660 employees as at December 31, 2015 -2017 – a decrease of 636535 employees. The said decrease in the number of employees stemsderives mainly from implementation of an efficiency plan in ICL UK and a decrease in the number of employees in the joint ventureUK, due to the ceased production of potash in  China (YPH), as wellICL Boulby mine and a shift to sole production of Polysulphate; in Germany - mainly as a result of the sale of non-core businessthe Fire Safety and Oil Additives (P2S5) in BKG, as well as the sale of the Rovita business; in the United States.

US - as a result of sale of the Fire Safety Business and Oil Additives (P2S5), mainly in ICL North America ; in Spain - as a result of the sale of the Fire Safety and Oil Additives (P2S5), mainly in Auxquimia SA.

Employment Agreements, Collective Bargaining Agreements and Temporary Employees

ICL employees in Israel are employed under collective or individual employment agreements. The collective bargaining agreements are signed for specified terms and are renewed from time to time. By law, in the event that a new collective bargaining agreement is not signed, the terms of the original agreement are extended for an unlimited period, unless one party gives notice to the other of its cancellation. As at the date of this Annual Report, no notice of cancellation had been given for any of the collective bargaining agreements currently in effect at ICL.


ICL

212

Subsidiaries Rotem, Fertilizers and Chemical Materials Ltd. (“FCM”), Dead Sea Magnesium and Bromine Compounds have collective bargaining agreements with termination dates ranging from June 2016January 2017 (an agreement that has not yet been renewed-in DSM) up to the end of 2018. The work2022.
In May 2018, a collective labor agreement at ICLwas signed between Dead Sea expiredWorks Ltd. (“DSW”) and the DSW Workers’ Union, the New General Organization of Workers in September 2015. AtIsrael (the “Histadrut”) and the present time,Negev District Organization of Workers, for a period of 5 years, commencing on October 1, 2017, the Company is carrying on negotiations in order to renewdate of expiration of the previous labor agreement.
In November 2018, a collective bargaining agreements in Fertilizers and Chemical Substanceslabor agreement was signed between Mifalei Tovala Ltd. and the Mifalei Tovala Workers’ Union and the New General Organization of Workers in Rotem Amfert Negev Ltd. The Workers CouncilIsrael (the “Histadrut”), for a period of Rotem Amfert initiates5 years, commencing on January 1, 2018, the date of expiration of the previous labor interruptions (strikes) from time to time.

agreement

Senior employees in Israel serving in special positions and members of management are employed under individual agreements. These agreements are not limited in time and may be terminated with advance notice of a few months.

Local employees

Employees of ICL’s subsidiaries overseas are employed according to the employment terms prevailing in the countries in which they are employed. Most of the overseas employees, primarily in China, Germany, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, Spain and the United States, are employed under collective bargaining agreements.

A relatively limitedsmall number of the employees at ourICL’s sites in Israel are employed by employment agencies for short terms. In addition, we have contracted in Israel with subcontractors for various outsourcing services such as security, packaging, maintenance, catering, cleaning and other services. In accordance with the decision received on October 2004 by ICL's Board of  the boards of directors of ICLDirectors and its Israeli subsidiaries, in October 2004, contractors who employ workers at ICL’s plants in Israel are required to give more than the salary terms required by law to employees working on a regular basis for ICL salary terms beyond those required by law.ICL. Pursuant to this decision, the employers are obligated to grant these employees, in addition to a current salary that must be at least 5% higher than the minimum wage stipulated by law, other benefits such as uniforms and meals.

Under Chinese PRC labor law, it is a mandatory requirement for employers to enter into individual labor contract with their employees, in light ofemployees. As such, the permanent staff of YPH JV shall be employed under respective individual labor contracts. However, under PRC law, the employees of a company have the right to establish a labor union to represent their interests and protect their legal rights. YPH JV has a labor union. The labor union may represent employees in negotiating with their employer for collective agreements regarding remuneration, working hours, workingwork safety, etc. Such collective agreements are mainly used for providing a benchmark for certain working conditions.
Promoting gender equality
In addition, 3C,January 2019 the Company announced that it is one of 230 public companies worldwide included in the subsidiaries2019 Bloomberg Gender-Equality Index (GEI). The GEI distinguishes companies committed to transparency in reporting gender policy and advancing gender equality. The GEI includes public companies that score above a globally-established threshold, based on transparency and their policies. The 2019 GEI includes firms from ten sectors headquartered across 36 countries and regions. Collectively, the firms have a combined market capitalization of YPH JV, has entered into$9 trillion and employ more than 15 million people, of which 7 million are women. ICL is the only Israeli company included in the index, as well as the only company among its major global peers in the specialty chemicals and fertilizers sectors.
213

ICL strives to be an “employer of choice”, and as such, continually promotes equality, including the employment and promotion of women in its workplaces around the globe. For example, the percentage of women serving as executive officers of ICL increased from 11% in 2017 to 33% in 2018. The Company considers its inclusion in the GEI to be a collective agreement with its female employees regarding special protection of female workers. The term of the collective agreement is two years starting from February 2015.

major achievement, highlighting ICL's transparency and commitment to promoting gender equality. 

Infrastructure, performance management processes and human resources development

In 2015,2018, the Company expanded the assimilation of the performance management infrastructure and the management of the human resources management.resource. In this context, the Company is assimilating a uniformunified technological infrastructure for managing and developing the human resourcesresource within all of its units worldwide, as well as globally uniformunified work processes. The assimilated system includes the administration of employees’ data, as well the learning and training processes,processes. In addition, the system enables managers and managing the performance of all of the Company’s employees. Since 2015, the upper echelons of the Company’s management (constituting approximately 10% of the Company’s human resources) have been taking partemployees to participate in a performance management process based on goals, performance evaluation, and groupteam and individual development plans deriving from them. The assimilationAssimilation of the global processes is expected to expand toand include additional processes in the fieldsareas of compensation and communications. Bycommunications, as well as to improve the beginning of 2018, it is expected to enhance the relationshiplink between performance and compensation, and to cover about 80% of the Company’s personnel.

rewards.

214


E. SHARE OWNERSHIP


Share-based payments to employees - Non-marketable options

Grant dateEmployees entitledNumber of instruments (thousands)Issuance's detailsInstrument termsVesting conditionsExpiration date
November 26, 2012August 6, 2014Officers and senior employees10,809 3,993An issuance of non-marketable and non-transferrable options, for no consideration, under the 2014 Equity Compensation Plan, to 416450 ICL officers and senior employees in Israel and overseas.This plan includes a “cap” for theUpon exercise, each option may be converted into one ordinary share of NIS 1 par value of the shares where if as atCompany. In case of on the exercise date the closing price of an ordinary share is higher than twice the exercise price (the “Share Value Cap”), the number of the exercised shares will be reduced so that the product of the exercised shares actually issued to an offeree multiplied by the share closing price will equal to the product of the number of exercised options multiplied by the Share Value Cap.
3 equal tranches: November 26, 2013, November 26, 2014 and November 26, 2015
(1) One third on December 1, 2016
(2) One third on December 1, 2017
(3) One third on December 1, 2018
The first and second tranches is at the end of 48 monthsTwo years from the issuance date, and the expiration date of the options for the third tranches is at the end of 60 months from the issuancevesting date.
CEO (*)December 11, 20141,190

August 6, 2014,

for ICL'sFormer CEO -August 2014

Officers and senior employees3,993 367An issuance of non-marketable and non-transferrable options, for no consideration, under the 2014 Equity Compensation Plan, to 450 ICL officers and senior employees in Israel and overseas.3 equal tranches: December 1, 2016, December 1, 2017 and December 1, 2018Two years from the vesting date.Plan.
CEO (*)367

May 12, 2015

for ICL's CEO & Chairman of the BOD - June 29, 2015

Officers and senior employees6,729An issuance of non-marketable and non-transferrable options, for no consideration, under the 2014 Equity Compensation Plan, to 550 ICL officers and senior employees in Israel and overseas.

Upon exercise, each option may be converted into one ordinary share of NIS 1 par value of the Company.

3 equal tranches:
(1) one third at the end of 12 months after the grant date
(2) one third at the end of 24 months after the grant date
(3) one third at the end of 36 months after the grant date

The first and second tranches is at the end of 36 months after the grant date and the expiration date of the options infor the third tranche is at the end of 48 months after the grant date.
CEO (*)June 29, 2015Former CEO530An issuance of non-marketable and non-transferrable options, for no consideration, under the 2014 Equity Compensation Plan.
Former Chairman of BOD (*)404

June 30, 2016

for ICL's CEO & Chairman of the

BOD - September 5, 2016

Officers and senior employees3,035An issuance of non-marketable and non-transferrable options, for no consideration, under the 2014 Equity Compensation Plan, to 90 ICL officers and senior employees in Israel and overseas.

Upon exercise, each option may be converted into one ordinary share of NIS 1 par value of the Company.

June 30, 2023
CEO (*)September 5, 2016Former CEO625An issuance of non-marketable and non-transferrable options, for no consideration, under the 2014 Equity Compensation Plan.
Chairman of BOD185 186
February 14, 2017Former CEO114An issuance of non-marketable and non-transferrable options, for no consideration, under the 2014 Equity Compensation Plan.February 14, 2024
June 20, 2017Officers and senior employees 6,868An issuance of non-marketable and non-transferrable options, for no consideration, under the 2014 Equity Compensation Plan  (amended)to 498 ICL officers and senior employees in Israel and overseas.June 20, 2024
August 2, 2017Chairman of BOD 165An issuance of non-marketable and non-transferrable options, for no consideration, under the 2014 Equity Compensation Plan.

215


Grant dateEmployees entitledNumber of instruments (thousands)Issuance's detailsInstrument termsVesting conditionsExpiration date
March 6, 2018Officers and senior employees 5,554An issuance of non-marketable and non-transferrable options, for no consideration, under the 2014 Equity Compensation Plan (as amended) to 508 ICL officers and senior employees in Israel and overseas, ICL CEO and Chairman of the BOD.Upon exercise, each option may be converted into one ordinary share of NIS 1 par value of the Company.February
3 equal tranches:
(1) one third at the end of 12 months after the grant date
(2) one third at the end of 24 months after the grant date
(3) one third at the end of 36 months after the grant date
March 6, 2025
May 14, 20242018CEO 385May 14, 2025
August 20, 2018Chairman of BOD 403August 20, 2025

(*) ICL’s CEO and Chairman of the BOD announced their resignation during 2016. For further details, see “Additional Information” below.


Share-based payments to employees - Restricted shares

Grant dateEmployees entitledNumber of instruments (thousands)Vesting conditionsInstrument termsAdditional InformationFair value at the grant date (Million)

August 6, 2014,

 

for ICL's CEO – August 2014

 

Officers and senior employees9223 equal tranches: December 1, 2016,  December 1, 2017 and December 1, 2018An issuance for no consideration, under the 2014 Equity Compensation Plan, to 450 ICL officers and senior employees in Israel and overseas.

The value of the restricted shares was determined according to the closing price on the TASE on the most recent trading day preceding the grant date (the date approval of the BOD and/or the date of the approval of the General Meeting).

 

The vesting date is subject to the directors continuing to serve in their positions on the vesting date, unless they ceased to hold office due to certain circumstances set forth in sections 231-232a and 233(2) of the Israeli Companies Law.

 

8.4
CEO (*)86
February 26, 2015Directors of the company (excluding ICL's CEO)99

(1) 50% will vest August 28, 2015

(2) 25% will vest February 26, 2017 

(3) 25% will vest February 26, 2018

An issuance for no consideration, under the 2014 Equity Compensation Plan.0.7

May 12, 2015,

 

for ICL's CEO & Chairman of the BOD - June 29, 2015

 

Officers and senior employees1,1943 equal tranches: (1) one third at the end of 12 months after the grant date (2) one third at the end of 24 months after the grant date (3) one third at the end of 36 months after the grant date.

An issuance for no consideration, under the 2014 Equity Compensation Plan, to 550 ICL officers and senior employees in Israel and overseas.

 

9.7
CEO (*)90
Chairman of the BOD (*)68
December 23, 2015ICL’s Directors  (excluding ICL's CEO& Chairman of the BOD)1213 equal tranches: December 23, 2016, December 23, 2017 and December 23, 2018.An issuance for no consideration, under the 2014 Equity Compensation Plan.0.5

June 30, 2016,

 

for ICL's CEO & Chairman of the BOD - September 5, 2016

 

Officers and senior employees9903 equal tranches: (1) one third at the end of 12 months after the grant date (2) one third at the end of 24 months after the grant date (3) one third at the end of 36 months after the grant date.An issuance for no consideration, under the 2014 Equity Compensation Plan, to 90 ICL officers and senior employees in Israel and overseas.6.0
Chairman of the BOD55
CEO (*)185
January 3, 2017ICL’s Directors (excluding ICL's Chairman of the BOD)146

An issuance for no consideration, under the 2014 Equity Compensation Plan (amended).

 

The value includes a reduction of 5% from the value of the equity compensation, pursuant to the decision of the directors in March 2016, to reduce their annual cash compensation for 2016 and 2017. 

1.0
February 14, 2017CEO38An issuance for no consideration, under the 2014 Equity Compensation Plan (amended).0.7

Grant dateEmployees entitledNumber of instruments (thousands)Vesting conditions (*)Instrument termsAdditional InformationFair value at the grant date (Million)
August 6, 2014Officers and senior employees 922
3 equal tranches:
(1) One third on December 1, 2016
(2) One third on December 1, 2017
(3) One third on December 1, 2018
 
An issuance for no consideration, under the 2014 Equity Compensation Plan, to 450 ICL officers and senior employees in Israel and overseas.The value of the restricted shares was determined according to the closing price on the TASE on the most recent trading day preceding the grant date (the date approval of the BOD and/or the date of the approval of the General Meeting where required).8.4
December 11, 2014Former CEO 86An issuance for no consideration, under the 2014 Equity Compensation Plan.
February 26, 2015ICL’s Directors (excluding ICL's CEO) 99
3 tranches:
(1) 50% will vest August 28, 2015
(2) 25% will vest February 26, 2017
(3) 25% will vest February 26, 2018
An issuance for no consideration, under the 2014 Equity Compensation Plan, to 11 ICL Directors.0.7
May 12, 2015Officers and senior employees 1,194
3 equal tranches:
(1) one third at the end of 12 months after the grant date
(2) one third at the end of 24 months after the grant date
(3) one third at the end of 36 months after the grant date
An issuance for no consideration, under the 2014 Equity Compensation Plan, to 550 ICL officers and senior employees in Israel and overseas.9.7
June 29, 2015Former CEO 90An issuance for no consideration, under the 2014 Equity Compensation Plan.
Former Chairman of the BOD 68
December 23, 2015ICL’s Directors (excluding ICL's CEO & Chairman of the BOD) 121
3 equal tranches:
(1) One third on December 23, 2016
(2) One third on December 23, 2017
(3) One third on December 23, 2018
 
An issuance for no consideration, under the 2014 Equity Compensation Plan, to 8 ICL Directors.0.5
(*) ICL’s CEOThe vesting date is subject to the employee entitled continuing to be employed by the Company and Chairmanthe directors continuing to serve in their positions on the vesting date, unless they ceased to hold office due to certain circumstances set forth in sections 231-232a and 233(2) of the BOD announcedIsraeli Companies LawShare-based payments to employees - Restricted shares

Grant dateEmployees entitledNumber of instruments (thousands)Vesting conditions (*)Instrument termsAdditional InformationFair value at the grant date (Million)
June 30, 2016Officers and senior employees 990
3 equal tranches:
(1) one third at the end of 12 months after the grant date
(2) one third at the end of 24 months after the grant date
(3) one third at the end of 36 months after the grant date
An issuance for no consideration, under the 2014 Equity Compensation Plan, to 90 ICL officers and senior employees in Israel and overseas.The value of the restricted shares was determined according to the closing price on the TASE on the most recent trading day preceding the grant date (the date approval of the BOD and/or the date of the approval of the General Meeting where required).4.8
September 5, 2016Chairman of the BOD 55An issuance for no consideration, under the 2014 Equity Compensation Plan.
Former CEO 185
January 3, 2017ICL’s Directors (excluding ICL's Chairman of the BOD) 146
An issuance for no consideration, under the 2014 Equity Compensation Plan, to 8 ICL Directors.
The value includes a reduction of 5% from the value of the equity compensation, pursuant to the decision of the directors in March 2016, to reduce their annual compensation for 2016 and 2017.
0.6
February 14, 2017Former CEO 38An issuance for no consideration, under the 2014 Equity Compensation Plan.0.2
June 20, 2017Officers and Senior employees 2,211An issuance for no consideration, under the 2014 Equity Compensation Plan, to 494 ICL officers and senior employees in Israel and overseas.10
August 2, 2017Chairman of BOD 53An issuance for no consideration, under the 2014 Equity Compensation Plan.0.3
January 10, 2018ICL’s Directors (excluding ICL's CEO & Chairman of the BOD) 137An issuance for no consideration, under the 2014 Equity Compensation Plan, to 7 ICL Directors.0.6

(*) The vesting date is subject to the employee entitled continuing to be employed by the Company and the directors continuing to serve in their resignation during 2016. For further details, see “Additional Information” below.

positions on the vesting date, unless they ceased to hold office due to certain circumstances set forth in sections 231-232a and 233(2) of the Israeli Companies Law.

217

Share-based payments to employees

- Restricted shares

Grant dateEmployees entitledNumber of instruments (thousands)Vesting conditions (*)Instrument termsAdditional InformationFair value at the grant date (Million)
March 6, 2018Officers and senior employees 1,726
3 equal tranches:
(1) one third at the end of 12 months after the grant date
(2) one third at the end of 24 months after the grant date
(3) one third at the end of 36 months after the grant date
An issuance for no consideration, under the 2014 Equity Compensation Plan (as amended).The value of the restricted shares was determined according to the closing price on the TASE on the most recent trading day preceding the grant date (the date approval of the BOD and/or the date of the approval of the General Meeting where required).8
May 14, 2018CEO 1210.6
August 20, 2018Chairman of BOD 470.2
ICL’s Directors (excluding ICL's CEO & Chairman of the BOD) 88Acceleration at January 2019.0.4
(*) The vesting date is subject to the employee entitled continuing to be employed by the Company and the directors continuing to serve in their positions on the vesting date, unless they ceased to hold office due to certain circumstances set forth in sections 231-232a and 233(2) of the Israeli Companies Law.

218

Share-based payments to employees
Additional Information

For additional information regarding the 2014 Equity Compensation Plan and the grants in prior years made under the said Plan, see Note 21 to our audited financial statements.

Audited Financial Statements.

For information with respect to share ownership of members of our Management and Supervisory Boards and our senior management see “Item 7.7 - Major Shareholders and Related (and Interested) Party Transactions”.

In September 2016, the Company’s CEO announced his resignation. In light of the above, during the third quarter of 2016 the grants awarded to the CEO as part of the Company’s equity compensation plans, which are not expected to vest by the end of his tenure, were forfeited. In addition, conclusion of the employer-employee relationship with the previous Chairman of the Company’s Board of Directors will take place on September 1, 2017. Accordingly, the grants awarded to him that will not vest by the said date were forfeited.


219

Item 7 – MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED (AND INTERESTED) PARTY TRANSACTIONS

A. MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS

The following table presents, as of March 1, 2017February 26, 2018 (unless otherwise noted below),*** the beneficial ownership of our ordinary shares by each person who is known by us to be the beneficial owner of 5% or more of our outstanding ordinary shares and each of our directors and executive officers. The data presented is based on information provided to us by the holders or disclosed in public regulatory filings.

 Ordinary Shares
Beneficially Owned(1)
Special State
Share
ShareholdersNumber%Number%
Israel Corporation Ltd.(2)587,178,76146.00%**--
PotashCorp Agricultural Cooperative Society Ltd.(3)176,088,63013.56%--
State of Israel(4)--1100%
Johanan Locker55,215*--
Avisar Paz-*--
Aviad Kaufman-*--
Sagi Kabla-*--
Ovadia Eli42,496*--
Yaacov Dior42,496*--
Miriam Haran42,496*--
Geoffrey Merszei42,496*--
Shimon Eckhaus42,496*--
Asher Grinbaum289,742*--
Kobi Altman171,509*--
Hezi Israel82,124*--
Lisa Haimovitz68,126*--
Yakir Menashe99,502*--
Rani Lobenstein9,726*--
Charles Weidhas291,782*--
Nissim Adar295,279*--
Ofer Lifshitz138,932*--
Eli Glazer166,561*--

Ordinary Shares
Beneficially Owned(1)
Special State
Share
ShareholdersNumber%Number%
Israel Corporation Ltd.(2)
587,178,76145.86%**--
State of Israel(3)
--1100%
Johanan Locker155,369*--
Avisar Paz-*--
Aviad Kaufman-*--
Sagi Kabla-*--
Ovadia Eli79,199*--
Nadav Kaplan20,553*--
Lior Reitblatt95,553*--
Reem Aminoach36,703*--
Ruth Ralbag36,703*--
Yoav Doppelt15,381*--
Raviv Zoller120,919*--
Kobi Altman211,703*--
Lilach Geva Harel-*--
Ilana Fahima-*--
Rani Lobenstein30,190*--
Charles Weidhas171,065*--
Ofer Lifshitz131,108*--
Eli Glazer163,979*--
Noam Goldstein55,327*--
Anat Tal-Ktalav55,327*--
Amir Meshulam20,793*--

* Less than 1%

** For additional information, please see section (2) below.

*** The information above is correct as of February 26, 2019.
220


According to the information conveyed to the Company, on June 25, 2018, XT Investments Ltd. (who, up to the sale date, held 20% of the issued share capital of Millennium Investments Elad Ltd. (holding, on its part, 46.94% of Israel Corp. Ltd share capital)) sold 377,662 ordinary shares of the Company that constituted, as at the sale date, approximately 0.03% of the Company’s issued share capital, in an off-market transaction according to a rate of ILS 17.10 per share. According to the information conveyed to the Company, following the sale, XT Investments Ltd. does not directly hold any shares of the Company.
On 16 and 17 May 2016,June 19 2018, our Human Resources andHR & Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors approved, respectively, subject to approval byand on August 20, 2018, the General Meeting of Shareholders, the granting of equity compensationshareholders approved, an issuance to Mr. Locker, as part of a broader plan for the granting of equity compensation for the year 2016 to senior executives and employeesour Executive Chairman of the Company. On 29 August 2016 the General Meeting of Shareholders approved the granting,Board, Mr. Johanan Locker, for no consideration, of 55,215 restricted shares andan annual grant for 2018 of non-marketable options exercisable into 186,335Ordinary Shares and restricted Ordinary Shares, in a total value of our ordinaryNIS 3,300,000 (approx. $911,602). This amount was comprised of NIS 2,400,000 or $662,983 attributable to options (calculated on the basis of a Black & Scholes model, and comprised of NIS 900,000 ($248,619) which was the same amount of options as was granted in 2017, as well as an additional amount of options for 2018 in the amount of NIS 1,500,000 ($414,365)), collectively resulting in the grant of 402,685 options for 2018, and NIS 900,000 or $248,619 is attributable to the restricted shares, which was the same amount as was granted in 2017)which resulted in the grant of 41,244 restricted shares. See “Item 6.6 - Directors, Senior Management and Employees –Employees— B. Compensation”.

On 20 and 22 November 2016,July 12, 2018, our Human Resources andHR & Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors approved, respectively, and on 3 January approval was given byAugust 20, 2018, the General Meeting of Shareholders, the shareholders approved an annual  equity grant for 2017,2019, for no consideration, with a value per grant of 18,303NIS 310,000 (approximately $85,635), which amounted to 14,623 restricted shares, as determined according to the closing price of the Ordinary Shares on the TASE on December 31, 2018, being the trading day immediately preceding the Grant Date, to each of the CompanyCompany's directors (except for(excluding the Chairman of the Board, Mr. Johanan Locker). It was further approved thatLocker and excluding Messrs. Aviad Kaufman, Avisar Paz, and Sagi Kabla, who are officers of our controlling shareholder, the Israel Corporation will assign their capitalLtd.)), in accordance with the Company’s compensation or the economic benefit thereof, unto the Israel Corporation. Accordingly, a total amount of 54,909 restricted shares were allocated to the Israel Corporation.policy. See Note 2125 to our audited financial statementsAudited Financial Statements and “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—E. Share Ownership”.

On 7 and 14 February 2017, our Human Resources and Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors approved, respectively, the granting of 37,592 restricted shares and 114,065 options, without consideration, to our Acting CEO, Mr. Asher Grinbaum. Granting of the equity compensation to Mr. Grinbaum is for the year 2016, and is part of a broader plan for the granting of equity compensation for the year 2016 to senior executives and employees of the Company, within which Mr. Grinbaum was not an offeree as he was expected to retire at the time. The grant to Mr. Grinbaum is in accordance with the terms of compensation to which he was entitled in his previous office as Executive Vice President and COO.

(1) The percentages shown are based on 1,276,389,9071,280,301,147 ordinary shares issued and outstanding as of the date of this report (after excluding shares held by us or our subsidiaries). In accordance with SEC rules, beneficial ownership includes voting or investment power with respect to securities and includes the shares issuable pursuant to options that are exercisable within 60 days of the date of this report. Shares issuable pursuant to options are deemed outstanding for computing the percentage of the person holding such options but are not considered outstanding for computing the percentage of any other person.


(2) Israel Corp. is a public company listed for trading on the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange (TASE). Based on the information provided by Israel Corp., Millenium Investments Elad Ltd. (“Millenium”) and Mr. Idan Ofer are considered as joint controlling shareholders of Israel Corp., for purposes of the Israeli Securities Law (each of Millenium and Mr. Ofer hold shares in Israel Corp. directly, and Mr. Idan Ofer serves as a director of Millenium and has an indirect interest in it as the beneficiary of the foreign discretionary trust that has indirect control of Millenium)Millenium, as stated below). Millenium holds approx. 46%46.94% of the share capital in Israel Corp., which holds as at February 14, 2017December 31, 2018 approx. 46.18%45.86% of the voting rights and issued share capital of the Company. Millenium is held by Mashat Investments Ltd. (“Mashat”) and by XT Investments Ltd. (“XT Investments”), with 80% and 20% holding rates in the issued share capital, respectively. (It is noted that Mashat granted XT Investments a power of attorney for a fixed period (which is extendable) to vote according to XT's discretion  at General Meetings of Millenium in respect of shares constituting 5% of the voting rights in Millenium). Mashat is a private company, wholly owned by a Dutch company, Ansonia Holdings Singapore B.V. (“Ansonia”). which is incorporated in the Netherlands. Ansonia is a wholly-ownedwholly owned subsidiary of Jelany Corporation N.V. (registered in Curaçao), which is a wholly-ownedwholly owned subsidiary of thea Liberian company, Court Investments Ltd. (“Court”). Court is wholly owned by a foreign discretionary trust, in which Mr. Idan Ofer is the beneficiary. XT Investments which directly holds approximately 1.24% of the share capital of Israel Corp., is a shareholder in Millenium as stated. XT Investments is a private company,fully held in full by XT Holdings Ltd. (“XT Holdings”), a private company whose ordinary shares are held in equal shares by Orona Investments Ltd. (which is indirectly controlled by Mr. Ehud Angel) and by Lynav Holdings Ltd., a company that is controlled by a foreign discretionary trust in which Mr. Idan Ofer is a primethe beneficiary. Mr. Ehud Angel holds, among other things, a special share that grants him, inter alia, under certain limitations and for certain issues, an additional vote on the Board of Directors of XT Holdings. In addition, Kirby Enterprises Inc., which is indirectly held by the same trust that holds Mashat, in which, as stated, Mr. Idan Ofer is the beneficiary, holds approximately 0.74% of the share capital of Israel Corp. Furthermore, Mr. Idan Ofer holds directly approximately 3.85% of the share capital of Israel Corp. Furthermore, XT Investments directly holds approximately 0.03%
221

As of the Company's capital (namely, 377,662 Ordinary Shares).

As disclosed in the Schedule 13G filed by Israel Corp. on February 14, 2017 (the "13G"), (hereinafter – “the reporting date”)December 31, 2018, the number of ICL's shares held by Israel Corp. includes 2,286,720 Ordinary Shares,does not include 9,909,848 ordinary shares, which Israel Corp. has a right to regain within 60 days from the reporting date,are subject to certain forward sale agreements, as set forth on ICL's registration statement on Form F-1(hereinafter – the forward agreements)F-1 (the "Forward Agreements"), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on 23 September 23, 2014 (the "ICL Form F-1""Financial Transaction"). Israel Corp. does not have voting rights or dispositive power with respect to these 2,286,720 Ordinary Sharesthe shares subject to the forward agreements,Financial Transaction, which shares have been made available to the forward counterparties underfinancial entities (the “Forward Counterparties”) with whom it engaged in the forward agreements.Transaction. As at December 31, 2018, the settlement period of the Financial Transaction has commenced, which is expected to be executed, subject to its terms, in components at several settlement dates that will occur over a period of approx. 0.75 years. In accordance with the forward agreements,terms of the Financial Transaction, Israel Corp. will not regain voting rights and dispositive power with respect to allthe said shares (“physical settlement”), in whole or a portion of such 2,286,720 Ordinary Sharesin part, unless it informs the forward counterpartiesForward Counterparties otherwise at the relevant settlement dates specified in the forward agreements. In addition, the payment related to the 2,286,720 Ordinary Shares will be installments on a number of settlement dates. As at the reporting date, the number of ICL's shares held by Israel Corp. excludes 31,633,688 Ordinary Shares, which Israel Corp. has a right to regain from after 60 days following the reporting date, subject to the forward agreements, as set forth on the ICL Form F-1. Israel Corp. does not have voting rights or dispositive power with respect to these 31,633,688 Ordinary Shares subject to the forward agreements, which shares have been made available to the forward counterparties. Under the forward agreements, Israel Corp. will not regain voting and dispositive power with respect to all or a portion of such 31,633,688 Ordinary Shares unless it informs the forward counterparties otherwise at the relevant settlement dates specified in the forward agreements. In addition, the payment related to the 31,633,688 Ordinary Shares is expected to be in installments, on a number of settlement dates over a period of approximately three years.Forward Agreements. Even though Israel Corp. holds less than 50% of the Company’s ordinary shares, it still has decisive influence at the General Meetings of the Company’s shareholders and, effectively, it has the power to appoint directors and to exert significant influence with respect to the composition of the Company’s Board of Directors.

As of March 1, 2017, 42031 December 2018, 141 million ordinary shares have been pledged by Israel Corporation to secure certain liabilities, almost entirely comprised of margin loans with an aggregate outstanding principal amount of $788$260 million.

(3) PotashCorp Agricultural Cooperative Society Ltd. is an Israeli subsidiary of Potash Corporation of Saskatchewan Inc., a Canadian corporation whose shares are listed for trading on the Toronto Stock Exchange and the NYSE.

(4) For a description of the different voting rights held by the holder of the Special State Share, see “Description of Share Capital—The Special State Share” in our registration statement on Form F-1 (File(File no. 333-198711) filed with the SEC on September 22, 2014.

To

(4) According to the bestannual statements of our knowledge, asNutrien Ltd., the controlling shareholder of PotashCorp, published on February 5, 2018, on January 24, 2018 the sale of the datefull holdings of PotashCorp in ICL was completed, at the report, our shareholders registry includes one shareholder whose registered address is in the U.S., holding approximately 5.36%amount of our issued and outstanding ordinary shares. These data do not represent the portion of our176,088,630 Company shares, registered in the U.S., nor the number of beneficiary shareholders residing in the U.S., as such ordinary shares are held, accordingmainly to the registry, by an American nominee company, CEDE & Co.institutional bodies in Israel and the TASE nominee company unto which most of our ordinary shares are registered according to our shareholders registry, is the Nominee Company of Bank Hapoalim Ltd.

U.S.

222


B. RELATED (AND INTERESTED) PARTY TRANSACTIONS


Approval of Related (and Interested) Party Transactions

Approval of Related (and Interested) Party Transactions


Under the Companies Law, an interested party transaction may be approved only if it is for the benefit of the company. A transaction that is not an extraordinary transaction in which a director or officer has a personal interest requires the approval of the Board of Directors, unless the articlesArticles of associationAssociation of the company provide otherwise. Our Articles of Association provide that such a transaction, if it does not pertain to a director’s or officer’s compensation terms, may be approved by any of our Board of Directors, our Audit and FinanceAccounting Committee, a disinterested director or officer or a person authorized for this purpose by our Board of Directors. If the transaction is an extraordinary transaction, it must be approved by the Audit and FinanceAccounting Committee and the Board of Directors, and, under certain circumstances, by the shareholders of the Company. An “extraordinary transaction” is a transaction other than in the ordinary course of business, other than on market terms or that is likely to have a material impact on the company’s profitability, assets or liabilities.

Pursuant to the Companies Law, extraordinary transactions with the controlling shareholder and extraordinary transactions in which a controlling shareholder has a personal interest, require the approval of the audit committee,Audit Committee, or the compensation committeeCompensation Committee if such transaction is in connection with the terms of employment or service with the company, the boardBoard of directorsDirectors and the shareholders of the company.company (unless a relief exists pursuant to the Israeli Relief Regulation concerning Related Parties Transactions). The shareholder approval must be by a simple majority of all votes cast, provided that (i) such majority includes a simple majority of the votes cast by non-controllingnon‑controlling shareholders having no personal interest in the matter or (ii) the total number of votes of shareholders mentioned in clause (i) above who voted against such transaction does not exceed 2% of the total voting rights in the company.

The Companies Law prohibits any director who has a personal interest in an extraordinary transaction from being present at the discussion and voting on such transaction in the audit committeeAudit Committee or boardBoard of directors.Directors. Notwithstanding, a director who has a personal interest may be present at the meeting and vote on the matter if a majority of the directors or members of the audit committeeAudit Committee have a personal interest in the approval of such transaction. If a majority of the members of the Board of Directors have a personal interest in the transaction, such transaction also requires shareholder approval.

223


Approval of DirectorDirectors and Officer Compensation

Under the Companies Law, we are required to approve, at least once every three years, a compensation policy with respect to our directors and officers. Following the recommendation of our HR & Compensation and Human Resources Committee, the compensation policy must be approved by our Board of Directors and our Shareholders.shareholders. The shareholder approval must be by a simple majority of all votes cast, provided that (i) such majority includes a simple majority of the votes cast by non-controllingnon‑controlling shareholders having no personal interest in the matter or (ii) the total number of votes of shareholders mentioned in clause (i) above who voted against such transaction does not exceed 2% of the total voting rights in the company. In general, the compensation terms of directors, the chief executive officerChief Executive Officer and any employee or service provider who is considered a controlling shareholder, as well as a relative of a controlling shareholder, must be approved separately by the HR & Compensation and Human Resources Committee, the Board of Directors and the Shareholders.Shareholders (unless a relief exists pursuant to the Israeli Relief Regulation concerning Related Parties Transactions). Generally, shareholder approval is not required for director compensation payable in cash up to the maximum amount set forth in the regulations governing the compensation of external directors. Generally, the compensation terms of other officers who report directly to the chief executive officerChief Executive Officer require the approval of the HR & Compensation and Human Resources Committee and the Board of Directors, unless the HR & Compensation and Human Resources Committee approves that there is no material change to the terms of the compensation.

compensation, and if such possibility exists under the Compensation Policy.

On May 17, 2016 and July 17, 2013,7, 2016, our Board of Directors approved, and recommended that the general meeting of our shareholders approve, an updated compensation policy for our directors and officers in accordance with the recommendation of our HR & Compensation Committee in its meetings held on May 16, 2016 and Human Resources Committee, which approved the compensation policy on July 16, 2013. Our5, 2016. The Company’s compensation policy was approved by the general meeting of our Shareholdersshareholders on August 26, 2013. In March 2014, our 29, 2016 (the “Compensation and Human Resources Committee and our Board of Directors approved certain amendments to our compensation policy. In August 2014, our Compensation and Human Resources Committee and our Board of Directors approved, and on December 11, 2014, the General Meeting of Shareholders approved additional specific amendments to the compensation policy in effect at the time (the “Old Compensation Policy”Policy).

According to the Companies Law, a compensation policy for a period exceeding three years requires approval by the Board once every three years, based on a recommendation of the compensation committee,Compensation Committee, as well as approval by the general meeting of shareholders. In light of the experience accumulated in the course of implementation of the Old Compensation Policy, legislative amendments to the Companies Law and the regulations promulgated thereunder, and changes in the global business environment and our organizational structure, our Compensation and Human Resources Committee recommended to our Board of Directors, in its meetings dated 16 May 2016 and 5 July 2016, to adopt a new compensation policy.

Following the recommendation of our Compensation and Human Resources Committee, our Board of Directors discussed and decided, in its meetings dated 17 May 2016 and 7 July 2017, to approve a new compensation policy, and recommend approval thereof to the General Meeting of Shareholders .In a special meeting held on 29 August 2016, the General Meeting of Shareholders approved the new compensation policy (the “New Compensation Policy”). The New Compensation Policy includes formulae for calculation of the annual bonus to our CEO and Chairman of the Board. Therefore, in approving the New Compensation Policy, the General Meeting of Shareholders approved the annual bonus plan and payment of the annual bonus to our CEO and Chairman of the Board.

The New Compensation Policy includes various modifications as compared to the Old Compensation Policy, the key changes being as follows:

·Inclusion of formulae for calculation of the annual equity compensation of our CEO and Chairman of the Board;

·Modification of the proper range of ratios between the fixed and the variable components of the compensation of officers and modification of the ratio between the total employment cost of the CEO and officers and the average and median employment cost of all other Company employees;

·Removal of the limit on the basic salary of officers (up to 75% of the salary according to comparative wage surveys). The New Compensation Policy includes absolute number maximums of annual bonuses;

·Enhancing the connection and link between our financial results and the annual bonuses of our CEO and Chairman of the Board, by replacing the annual bonus mechanism in a manner whereby it is awarded according to our financial results in a given year;
shareholders.

·The specifics of the complete formula for determination of the annual bonus of our CEO are specified in the New Compensation Policy, the key aspects of which are as follows:

a.The CEO’s target bonus is up to 120% his basic annual salary;

b.The financial indicator comprises of two financial sub-indicators, each having 50% weight: 1. Division of the adjusted net profit by the average adjusted net profit in the three preceding years; 2. Division of the adjusted operating profit by the average operating profit in the three preceding years. The adjusted net and operating profit are those presented in our financial reports.

c.The financial indicator and financial sub-indicators were limited to 1.5;

d.In case the financial index in a given year is negative or nil (0), the CEO will not be awarded an annual bonus under the annual bonus plan;

e.The qualitative evaluation component for purposes of calculating the CEO’s bonus will not exceed 25% of the bonus pool determined by multiplying the financial index by the target bonus (the “Bonus Pool”);

f.Maximal payment of the CEO’s annual bonus shall not exceed the lowest of either 180% of the CEO’s target bonus or $2,500,000.

·The annual bonus of our Chairman of the Board is based on the same mechanism of the CEO’s annual bonus, but does not include adjustments based on KPIs and on qualitative evaluation. The target bonus of the Chairman of the Board is up to 120% his annual basic salary, while maximal payment of his bonus shall not exceed the lower of either 150% of the target bonus or $1,000,000;

·The annual bonuses of our other officers may be determined by our Compensation and Human Resources Committee and Board of Directors, through financial indicators and/or or KPIs and/or measurable evaluation. Payment of the annual bonus to officers shall not exceed, in a given fiscal year, the lower of either 225% of the target bonus of an officer respecting such year, or $1,000,000;

·Our Compensation and Human Resources Committee and Board of Directors may make additional adjustments to the calculation of our adjusted net and operating profit, in order to prevent distortions as a result of recognition of an income or expense deriving from unusual events, according to the specific circumstances of the case.

·Bonus deferral and adjustments mechanisms included in the Old Compensation Policy were cancelled.

·Awarding a special bonus in a given year was limited as follows:

a.Respecting our CEO – the maximum special bonus shall not exceed the difference between 3 monthly basic salaries and the component of the annual bonus formula based on qualitative evaluation;

b.Respecting our Chairman of the Board - the maximum special bonus shall not exceed 3 monthly basic salaries;

c.Respecting our other officers - the maximum special bonus shall not exceed 6 monthly basic salaries;

·The exercise price of option warrants will be determined according to the average price of our share in the 30 trade days preceding the date of approval of granting thereof by our Board or the actual granting of such option warrants.

·The exercise period respecting option warrants was extended to a maximum of 10 years.

·Upper limits were added respecting dilution as a result of equity grants (which will not apply to equity grants to the employees of merged companies).

·The maximal value of equity compensation bonuses in a vesting year were modified as follows:

a.Respecting the Chairman of the Board - $1,000,000 instead of 180% of the annual basic salary;

b.Respecting the CEO - $2,000,000 instead of 200% of the annual basic salary;

c.Respecting the other officers - $1,000,000 instead of 150% of the annual basic salary;

·The New Compensation Policy was amended in a manner whereby entitlement to an adjustment period will not be dependent on five years of employment of providing services;

·The upper limit respecting retirement bonus was removed. However, the New Compensation Policy provides a maximum payment of up to 24 monthly basic salaries within the framework of retirement arrangements provided by the New Compensation Policy;

·The compensation composition of non-officer directors provides that compensation may also include compensation for performing the duties of a committee chairman and/or board committee member.

·The maximum value of equity compensation, at the time of granting, to non-officer directors, was increased to $250,000 per vesting year, instead of $150,000 per year.

Transactions with relatedRelated (and Interested) Parties

Party Transactions

Registration Rights Agreement

We entered into a registration rights agreement with Israel Corporation on September 12, 2014. We obtained Shareholdershareholder approval of our entry into this agreement on May 8, 2014. This agreement provides for customary demand, piggyback and shelf registration rights and provides that we will perform various actions and comply with various requirements to facilitate and promote such registrations, as well as cover certain expenses of Israel Corporation in connection with any such registration.

224

Controlling Shareholder

As of the date of this report,December 31, 2018, Israel Corporation holds approximately 45.21%45.86% of our outstanding ordinary shares and approximately 44.34%45% of the voting rights of our Shareholders.


Israel Corporation exercises control over our operations and business strategy and has sufficient voting power to control many matters requiring approval by our Shareholders, including:

·The composition of our Board of Directors (other than external directors, as described under “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—C. Board Practices—External Directors”);

·Mergers or other business combinations;

·Certain future issuances of ordinary shares or other securities; and

·Amendments to our Articles of Association, excluding provisions of the Articles of Association that were determined by the Special State Share.

However, Israel Corporation does not exercise control with respect to our compensation policy and interested party transactions, since these must be approved by a majority of our non-related Shareholders.

shareholders.

Joint Insurance

On August 29, 2012, following approval bySeptember 14, 2017, our Auditshareholders approved the Company's engagement in directors and Accounting Committee and our Board of Directors, our Shareholders approvedofficers insurance policies, as a newthree-year framework resolution to purchase anagreement. The insurance policy for two-tier coverage of director and officer liability jointlypolicies under the framework agreement include a joint primary tier with Israel Corporation. The first tier, which is sharedCorp. with Israel Corporation, has a joint liability limit of up to $20 million, and the premiums are paid about 42.5% by us and about 57.5% by Israel Corporation. The second tier covers us alone for up to $200 million. This framework resolution is valid for up to three years.

In August 2013, following approval by our Human Resources & Compensation Committee and our Board of Directors, our Shareholders approved an increase of the total insurance cap to $350 million.

In connection with our initial public offering, we updated the terms of our insurance policy for directors and officers in accordance with the practice of companies listed in the United States, including with respect to the limit of liability, the premium and the apportioning of the insurance premium to be paid between us and Israel Corporation. The insurance policy includes a joint tier with Israel Corporation with a liability limit of up to $20 million, and a separate tier that covers uscovering the Company alone, forwith a liability cap of up to $200 million, for a total liability limit of $220 million withfor both tiers. Under the terms of the framework resolution, our directors and officers asare beneficiaries of both tiers. ThePursuant to the framework agreement, the division of the premium amount between the Company and Israel Corp. in the joint tier is that 70% are to be paid by the Company and 30% by the Israel Corp.

According to the approval of the general meeting of our shareholders, the HR & Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors will have the authority to approve changes from time to time in connection with the rate of the premium distribution between the ICL Group and the Israel Corporation Group in respect of the joint tier, as recommended by the insurers and/or brokers, provided that the new insurance policy was approved by our Shareholders, as a three year framework resolution, in May 8, 2014, following approval by ourrate of the premium distribution will not exceed 25% over the entire transaction period. Deviation from these limits shall require the shareholders approval. On December 4 and 5, 2017, the Audit and& Accounting Committee and Board of Directors.


On 13 October 2015, we renewed ourDirectors approved the renewal of the insurance policy, relating to officers currently serving or that will serveon the basis of the framework agreement, for an additional year beginning on January 1, 2018, and until December 31, 2018, with an annual premium of $900,000, which is within the maximum premium amount specified in the Company from time to time, as well as their liability in their capacity as officers of certain companies to which they have been or will be appointed by the ICL Group or on its behalf, as of September 1, 2015 until August 31, 2016.

framework resolution.

On August 4January 3 and 9, 2016, respectively, the Compensation7, 2019, our Audit & Accounting Committee and the Board of Directors approved the renewal of the insurance policy for officers currently serving or that will serve in the Company from time to time, as well as their liability in their capacity as officers of certain companies to which they have been or will be appointed by the ICL Group or on its behalf, for the period of one additional year, commencing on September 1, 2016 and valid until August 31, 2017. Pursuant2019, according to the new policy framework agreement, with a limit of $205 million, additional coverage Side A (directors only) limit of $20 million (as approved by our Audit & Accounting Committee on June 19, 2018 and December 10, 2018 and by the divisionBoard on June 19, 2018 and December 12, 2018) and a total premium of up to $1,400,000. This amount (including the Side A premium), does not exceed the maximum premium amount pursuant to the framework agreement. The allocation of the premium amount in the joint tierdistribution between ICL and Israel Corp was set so that 70% will be paid by the Companyrevised to 80% ICL and 30% by the20% Israel Corporation, in accordance with framework resolution. The insurance policy includes a joint first tier with Israel Corporation with a joint liability limit up to $20 million per occurrence and in the aggregate, and a second and separate tier that covers officers' liability in the ICL Group alone for additional up to $200 million per occurrence and in the aggregate (the total policy amounts to $220 million). According to the framework resolution, the officers of the ICL group are beneficiaries of both tiers. The said approval also included approval of an overall annual premium at the amount of $800,000 to be paid by the Company for the said policy, and which does not exceed of maximal premium amount set within the framework resolution. Corp.
The terms of the new policy adhere to the terms of the framework resolution and of the Company's Compensation Policy. The valid coverage as of the date of this report (including the joint tier with the parent company up to $20 million) is in a total amount of $220 million.

225

Management Fees to Controlling Shareholder

We have been paying our parent company, Israel Corporation, annual management fees for management services, since 1996. Management serviceswhich include service of board members and ongoing general consulting, such as professional, financial, strategic and managerial consulting, and consulting and representation in regulatory discussions and issues.consulting. The parties may agree to expand the management services to additional areas. In
On January 201517, 2018, our Human Resources & CompensationAudit and Accounting Committee and our Board of Directors approved, and on February 26, 2015April 24, 2018, our General Meeting of Shareholdersshareholders approved, the extension of therenewed management agreement that expiredeffective retroactively as of January 1, 2018, for an additional term of three years, expiring on December 31, 2014,2020. According to the renewed management agreement, the annual management fee paid to Israel Corp for an additional periodeach calendar year, shall not exceed $1,000,000, plus VAT. Such amount includes the overall value of the cash and equity compensation for the years 2015-2017, underservice of our directors whom are office holders of Israel Corp., and any and all prior or other compensation arrangements relating to such directors were cancelled. In addition, the same terms, except for the following changes: (1) upon approvalrenewed agreement was amended so as to no longer include an increase of the terms of office for the Executive Chairman of the Board, management fees shall be reduced to $1a threshold of $3.5 million plus VAT. InVAT in case the Chairmanan executive chairman of the Board is appointed Executive Chairmanon behalf of Israel Corporation. All other provisions of the Board and thereafter ceasesmanagement agreement remained unchanged. According to serve and be compensated as an Executive Chairmanthe decision of the Board, as of such time management fees shall once more be set at an amount of $3.5 million plus VAT; (2) to allow the Company to grant equity compensation to incumbent and future directors who are employed by the Israel Corporation (such directors do not receive cash compensation for their service); these directors may assign their equity compensation to Israel Corporation.


Since the appointment of Mr. Nir Gilad as Executive Chairman of the Board, and as of the date of this report, on which Mr. Johanan Locker serves as Executive Chairman of the Board, the annual management fees for management services to Israel Corporation amounts to $1 million plus VAT.

On 20 and 22 November 2016, our Human Resources and Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors approved, respectively, and on 3 January approval was given by the General Meeting of Shareholders,our shareholders, the granting, without consideration, of 18,303 restricted shares to eachAudit & Accounting Committee will annually examine the reasonableness of the Company directors (except forManagement Fees paid in the Chairman ofprevious year against the Board, Mr. Johanan Locker). It was further approved that Messrs. Aviad Kaufman, Avisar Paz, and Sagi Kabla, who or officers of our controlling shareholder, theManagement Services actually provided by Israel Corporation, will assign their capital compensation or the economic benefit thereof, unto the Israel Corporation. Accordingly, a total amount of 54,909 restricted shares were allocatedCorp to the Israel Corporation. See “Item 7. Major ShareholdersCompany in the same year. On February 4 and Related Party Transactions — A. Major Shareholders”. In addition, pursuant to25, 2019, the approval by our General Meeting dated 23 December 2015, Mr. Aviad Kaufman is assigningAudit & Accounting Committee examined the cash compensation granted him unto Millennium.

management services that were actually rendered in 2018 against the management fees paid in that year and concluded that the fees were reasonable.

Deposit agreement with the Controlling shareholder

Subsequent to the date of the report, on March 13 and 14, 2017, ICL's Audit and Accounting Committee and its Board of Directors, respectively, approved

For details regarding a frameworkdeposit agreement with theour controlling shareholder, Israel Corporation Ltd. (hereinafter – Israel Corp.), for three years, accordingsee Note 25 to which Israel Corp. can deposit, occasionally, an amount of up to $ 150 million in short-term U.S. dollar or shekel deposits in ICL subject to ICL’s will. The terms and conditions of the deposits, including the interest rate, will be determined on the date of the deposits. The deposits will be received by ICL without security.

our Audited Financial Statements.

Relationships with Other Companies

A subsidiary in our Specialty Solutions segment entered into a long-term agreement with PCS, an interested party of the Company for the acquisition of food quality phosphoric acid. The agreement was signed before the subsidiary was acquired by the Company and is in effect until 2018

In 2013, the Company's Board of Directors authorized to certain subsidiaries in Israel to purchase electricity from OPC Rotem (a company related to the Company’s controlling shareholder).

In AprilDecember 2017, each of the following: the Company, Oil Refineries Ltd. (a public company one of whose controlling shareholders is Israel Corporation Ltd., whose controlling shareholders are related to Kenon Holdings Ltd. (“Kenon”)), and OPC Energy Ltd. (a public company which, as conveyed to the Company, views Kenon as its controlling shareholders for purposes of the Israeli Securities Law), engaged in a gas purchase agreement with Energean Israel Limited (“Energean”), under which Energean will supply the Company with natural gas at a quantity of up to 13 BCM, at a value of $1.9 billion, over a period of 15 years. The agreement was examined and approved by an independent committee composed of external and independent directors of the Company on December 3, 2017, and thereafter by the Audit Committee and Board of Directors, on December 4 and 5, 2017, respectively. The Audit and Accounting Committee, in the presence of only Ms. Ruth Ralbag, Mr. Lior Reitblatt and Mr. Geoffrey Merszei, and the Company’s Board of Directors, have reapproved the agreement on January 17, 2018. The agreement was approved by the General Meeting of our shareholders on February 22, 2018. For further details regarding the gas agreement see “Item 5 - Operating and Financial Review and Prospects— A. Operating Results— Principal Factors Affecting our Results of Operations and Financial Condition”.
In addition to any other transaction with our controlling shareholder set forth in this annual report, in 2018 the following transactions were approved with respect to 2018 (all of which were classified by the Audit and Accounting Committee as transactions in the ordinary course of business, immaterial and in market terms), and approved by our Board of Directors:
1.We obtain shipping services from Zim, an affiliate of Israel Corporation, and paid them about $8 million in each of the years 2016, 2017 and 2018.
2.We purchase Sulfur from Oil Refineries Ltd., a subsidiary of Israel Corporation, and paid them about $2 million, $2.5 million and $3.2 million, in 2016, 2017 and 2018, respectively.
3.We provide transportation services to ZIM, an affiliate of Israel Corporation, and were paid by them about $2.1 million, $1.6 million and $1.4 million in 2016, 2017 and 2018, respectively.
4.We sell distilled water from Oil Refineries Ltd., a subsidiary of Israel Corporation, and were paid about $2 million in 2018.
In addition, the Company receives banking services in the ordinary course of business from Hamizrahi Bank, Leumi L’Israel Ltd. (Leumi),from time to time. To the best of the Company's knowledge, Mr. Eyal Ofer, Mr. Idan Ofer's brother, is considered an interested party in ICL, sold its holdings in Israel Corporation’s shares (5.86%). As a result, from the time of the said sale, Leumi ceased to be an interested party in ICL.

Hamizrahi Bank.

226

The table below sets forth certain income statement information with respect to balances of our related party transactions.

 For the year ended December 31
 201620152014
 $ millions$ millions$ millions
    
Sales35326
Cost of sales113127173
Selling, transport and marketing expenses7916
Financing expenses (income), net-2248
Management fees to the parent company124
    

 For the year ended December 31
 201820172016
 $ millions$ millions$ millions

Sales 5 8 35
Cost of sales 19 97 113
Selling, transport and marketing expenses 7 8 7
Financing expenses (income), net 3 (9)-
General and administrative expenses 1 1 1
Management fees to the parent company 1 1 1

The table below sets forth certain balance sheet information with respect to balances of our related party transactions

 As at December 31
 20162015
 $ millions$ millions
   
Long-term deposits, net of current maturities-1
   
Other current assets833
   
Other current liabilities2033
   

The Company declares a dollar dividend that is paid in NIS, pursuant to the exchange rate on the effective date. The Company executes a hedging transaction in order to hedge the exposure to changes in the U.S. dollar/NIS exchange rate. The dividend paid to the Company’s controlling shareholder, Israel Corporation, is made partly based on the exchange rate on the effective date and partly based on the exchange rate on the date of distribution. In addition, the dividend paid to an interested party is made pursuant to the exchange rate on the date of distribution.

 As at December 31
 20182017
 $ millions$ millions

Other current assets 28 38
   
Other current liabilities 7 191


For additional information regarding our related party transactions, see Note 25 to our audited financial statements.

Audited Financial Statements.

Option Plans

For a description of the Option Plans see “Item 6.6 - Directors, Senior Management and Employees—E. Share Ownership”.

C. INTERESTS OF EXPERTS AND COUNSEL

Not Applicable.


227

Item 8 – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

A. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS AND OTHER FINANCIAL

INFORMATION

A.CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS AND OTHER FINANCIAL INFORMATION
The fixed operating costs for the years 2016, 2015ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 20142016 amounted to approximately $2,304$2,188 million, $2,335$2,265 million and $2,432$2,304 million, respectively. The variable operating costs for the years 2016, 2015ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 20142016 amounted to approximately $1,849 million, $2,524 million and $3,062 million, $2,305 million and $2,921 million, respectively.

respectively.

See “Item18 - Financial Statements.”

Statements”.

Business Concentration Law

On December 11, December 2013, the Law for Encouragement of Competition and Reduction of Business Concentration, 5774-2013 (the “Business Concentration Law"), was published, which includes, among other things, provisions requiring regulators authorized to grant rights in areas defined as essential infrastructure in Israel, to take into account considerations for encouraging industry-wideindustry‑wide competition and reducing business concentration in the overall economy prior to granting rights in public assets to private entities defined as high-concentrationhigh‑concentration entities. The Business Concentration Law sets forth a list of "rights", including authorization, license, concession or permit and a contract, and also includes a list of matters defined as an essential infrastructure, including areas in which we are engaged, such as quarrying, mining, water, etc. The list of high-concentrationhigh‑concentration entities was published in accordance with the criteria provided in the Business Concentration Law, and ICL and its main subsidiaries in Israel are included therein, as aforesaid. In our estimation, inclusion of the Company and its main subsidiaries in Israel in the list of high-concentrationhigh‑concentration entities is not expected to have a significant adverse effect on us and its financial results. However, in light of the frequent changes in the regulatory environment in Israel and the existing uncertainty regarding the manner of granting rights in natural resources in a manner other than that provided in current legal provisions, among other things in relation to the manner of granting a concession for minerals extraction from the Dead Sea in 2030, as well as in relation to the granting of phosphate mining licenses, under the provisions of the Israeli Mining Ordinance, it is possible that our estimation will prove to be inaccurate.

228


Price Monitoring

The prices of fertilizer-gradefertilizer‑grade phosphoric acid for local Israeli customers are regulated under the Supervision of Prices for Commodities and Services Law 1996. The quantity of these products sold in Israel by ICLthe Phosphate Solutions segment is not material to ICL.

In the United States and Brazil, import of magnesium and magnesium alloys from China is subject to anti-dumping duties imposed in order to protect the local industry in these countries, which are the main markets in which ICL Magnesium sells its products.

ICL and some of its subsidiaries have been declared a monopoly in Israel in the following areas: potash, phosphoric acid, sulfuricsulphuric acid, ammonia, chemical fertilizers, granular triple super phosphate, phosphates, bromine and bromine compounds. Due to their having been declared monopolies, ICL isand its subsidiaries are subject to limitations set forth in Chapter 4 of the Economic Competition Law, 1988 (formerly, Restrictive Business Practices Law, 1988,1988), most significantly its prohibition on monopolies against abusing their positions as monopolies. In 20152018 and 2017 approximately 4% and in 2016 approximately 4%3%, respectively, of our revenue derived from Israeli sales and, therefore, in our estimation, and without derogating from the abovementionedlegal implications of the above-mentioned declaration, on the whole, the said declaration does not have a material impact on us. We also have an internal antitrust compliance program.

program in place.

Legal Proceedings

Tax Proceedings

1.
The Company and the main operational companies in Israel (DSW, Rotem, Bromine, DSM, BCL and F&C), along with most of the other companies in Israel, have received final tax assessments up to and including 2011. The main subsidiaries outside of Israel have final tax assessments up to and including 2011 and 2012.
2.
Israel - In December 2013, an assessment was received from2018, the Israeli Tax Authority (“ITA”) wherebyAuthorities (hereinafter - the ITA) rejected the company's objection relating to an assessment issued to the Company is requiredand to paycertain Israeli subsidiaries, and demanded an additional tax in addition to the amount it already paid in respect ofpayment, for the years 2009-2011,2012‑2014, in the amount of about $235$73 million. The Company has appealed the ITA's assessment. On December 8, 2016, the Company withdrew the said appeal and agreed with the Taxes Authority to close outdisputes the assessment for the above-mentioned years and to also putfiled an endappeal to the main disputes in connection withJerusalem District Court. In the open tax years, in consideration of payment of an additional amount, beyond the amounts paid up to now, in the amount of $60 million, including interest and linkage differences.Company’s estimation, it is more likely than not that its claims will be accepted.

In light of that stated above, inaddition, regarding tax assessment for the financial statementsyears 2010-2015 for 2016 the Company updated the tax provisions, in the amount of about $34 million. As at the dateTetrabrom (one of the report,downstream production companies in Israel), in October 2018, the Company has provisionscompany reached an agreement with the ITA, which resulted in its books that fully cover the above-mentioned agreement.

2.In August 2016, the Ethiopian Tax Authority decided to reject the appeal filed by the subsidiary Allana Afar (hereinafter – “Allana”) regarding the tax assessment from June 2016, in the amount of $55 million. Allana contends the tax assessment is illegal and unjustified, and therefore declined to pay it, an action that triggers imposition of sanctions according to Ethiopian law, including, foreclosure of property and revocation of the mining concession. In light of that stated above and in view of the Ethiopian government’s failure to provide the necessary infrastructures and regulatory framework for the project, in October 2016, the Company’s Board of Directors instructed Management to take all necessary actions towards termination of the project.

immaterial amounts.
3.In lightThe company's subsidiary in Belgium recognized a notion deduction on its capital based on its interpretation of the decisionBelgian tax law, which was validated by the Court of Appeals in Belgium. The tax authorities dispute the eligibility of the deduction by appealing to the Supreme Court against the Court of Appeals' resolution and issuing tax assessments in a total amount of $27 million for Tax Mattersthe years commencing 2010. The Company believes, it is more likely than not that its tax position will also be accepted by the Supreme Court.

229

4.
Currently, the Company is also under tax audits in Belgium, from April 2016, to rejectSpain and Germany for the petition filed by a subsidiaryyears 2012‑2015. As at the date of ICL in connection with deduction of certain expenses in prior periods, and following charges receivedthe report, there are no additional tax payment requests from the Belgium Tax Authorities,tax authorities, excluding immaterial amounts in Germany. The Company believes that the Company recorded tax expensesprovisions in its financial statements for 2016, in the aggregate amount of $14 million. The Company has filed an appeal of the Court’s decision. A hearing with respect to the matter has been scheduled to be held in December 2017.books are sufficient.

ICL Dead Sea Proceedings

Arbitration regarding Royalties at ICL Dead Sea Ltd.

Pursuant to the Israeli Dead Sea Concession Law, 1961 (hereinafter –the Concession Law), as amended in 1986, and the concession indenture attached as an addendum to the Concession Law, DSW was granted a concession to utilize the resources of the Dead Sea and to lease the land required for its plants in Sodom for a period that is expected to end on March 31, 2030, accompanied by a priority right to receive the concession after its expiration, should the Government wish to offer a new concession to a third party.


In 2015, the Minister of Finance appointed a team for determination of the “governmental activities to be conducted towards the end of the concession period”. The public’s comments regarding its positions and viewpoints in connection with the end of the concession were submitted to the team. The team was asked to submit its recommendations to the Minister of Finance by May 2016, however to the best of the Company’s knowledge up to the date of the report the team had not yet submitted its recommendations. There is no certainty as to what the recommendations of this team will be with regard to the procedures that the government will undertake in connection with the existing concession and as to the manner in which future mining rights will be granted.

In addition, the Minister of Finance appointed a team headed by the Accountant General designated to establish the manner in which, according to the current concession, the replacement value of DSW’s tangible assets will be calculated in the event such assets are returned to the government at the end of the concession period. The actual calculation will be executed only in 2030. The team was requested to submit its recommendations to the Minister of Finance by March 2015.

In January 2017, the Accountant General sent a letter to the Chief Economist – the Supervisor of the State’s revenues wherein she noted that recently the position of the Division of the Accountant General in the Ministry of Finance regarding the arrangement covering the assets was finalized (but was not published), however in light the expected changeover of the Accountant General, the draft position report is being transferred to the incoming Accountant General for completion of the work. At this stage, there is no certainty regarding the recommendations of the new Accountant General. In addition, there is no certainty as to how the Government will interpret the Concession Law, the manner in which this process and methodology will ultimately be implemented, and how the value of the tangible assets will be calculated.

In consideration of the concession, DSW pays royalties to the Government of Israel, calculated at the rate of about 5% of the value of the products at the factory gate, less certain expenses, where according to the salt harvesting agreement, which was signed in July 2012, the royalties rate in respect of the annual quantity of potash sold in excess of 1.5 million tons is 10% (in place of 5%). In addition, according to the salt harvesting agreement, if legislation is enacted that changes the specific fiscal policy in connection with profits or royalties deriving from mining of quarries from the Dead Sea, the Company’s consent will not apply regarding the increase in the royalties’ rate on the surplus quantities referred to above, commencing from the date on which additional tax is collected as stated in the legislation. In November 2015, the Economic Efficiency Law was published, including implementation of the Sheshinski Committee’s recommendations, which address royalties and taxation of excess profits from Dead Sea minerals. The law entered into effect on January 1, 2016.

DSW granted a sub-concession to Dead Sea Bromine Ltd. (hereinafter – “the Bromine Company”) to produce bromine and its compounds from the Dead Sea, the expiration date of which is concurrent with the DSW's concession. The royalties in respect of the products manufactured by the Bromine Company are received by DSW from the Bromine Company, and DSW then pays them over to the State.


In addition, there is an arrangement relating to payment of royalties by Dead Sea Magnesium (hereinafter – “DSM”) for production of metal magnesium by virtue of a specific arrangement with the State provided in the Government’s decision dated September 5, 1993. Pursuant to the arrangement, royalties are paid by DSM on the basis of carnallite used for production of magnesium. The arrangement with DSM provides that during 2006 the State may demand a reconsideration in connection with the amount of the royalties and the method or their calculation for 2007 and thereafter. The State’s demand for reconsideration, as stated, was first received at the end of 2010, and the matter is presently in an arbitration proceeding, as described below.

In 2007, a letter was received from the previous Accountant General of the Israeli Ministry of Finance, claiming an underpayment of royalties amounting to hundreds of millions of shekels. Pursuant to the concession, disputes between the parties relating to the concession, including royalties, are to be decided by an arbitration panel of three arbitrators (each side appoints an arbitrator and these two appoint the third).

In 2011, the arbitration proceeding commenced between the State of Israel and DSW regarding the manner of calculation of the royalties under the concession and the royalties to be paid for magnesium metals and the payment or refunds (if any) due deriving from these matters. In the statement of claim filed by the State of Israel in the arbitration proceedings, the State of Israel is claiming the amount of $265 million in respect of underpayment of royalties for the years 2000 through 2009, with the addition of interest and linkage differences, and a change in the method of calculating the royalty payments from the sale of metal magnesium.

In 2014, a partial arbitration decision was received regarding the royalties’ issue. Based on the principles of the decision received, DSW is also required to pay the State royalties on the sale of downstream products manufactured by companies that are controlled by ICL that have production plants located both in and outside of the Dead Sea area, including outside of Israel. The royalties are to be paid according to the value of the downstream products, which will be set according to the formula described in Section 15(a)(2) of the Concession Deed, based on the selling price of the downstream products to unrelated third parties less the deductions set forth in subsections (I), (II) and (III) of that Section. Regarding metal magnesium, it was decided that the State of Israel and DSW are to exhaust their discussions on the subject of the amount of the royalties to be paid by DSW on metal magnesium, and if no agreement is reached the matter is to be returned to arbitration. The arbitrators’ decision is partial and its main decision is with respect to payment of royalties on downstream products, as stated above.

As part of the second stage of the arbitration, which addresses the financial calculation principles, between September 2016 and January 2017, the arbitrators issued their decisions regarding the various issues relating to the financial calculations, as stated.

In November 2016, the arbitrators' resolution regarding the principles for calculating the interest and linkage differences to be added to the principal amounts paid to the State of Israel for the years 2000 through 2013. According to the said resolution, the calculation basis for the principal amounts of the royalties paid for the said period should be an NIS basis and accordingly, NIS interest and linkage differences apply as stipulated in the Israeli Interest and Linkage Law.

Based on that stated above, the total expenses recognized in the Company's financial statements commencing from 2014 regarding the royalties' dispute and coverage of part of the State's legal expenses is $170 million ($13 million in 2016) and $60 million with respect to the interest and linkage differences ($26 million in 2016).


In 2016, 2015 and 2014, DSW paid current royalties to the Government of Israel in the amounts of $53 million, $97 million and $84 million, respectively. In addition, in 2015, the Company paid an amount of $152 million, in respect of royalties relating to prior periods.

ICL Dead Sea Class Action

In 2014, ICL received a petition submitted in Israel to the District Court in respect of a purported class action against its subsidiary, DSW. According to the petition, the plaintiff is a farmer who has bought and currently buys potash in Israel for fertilization purposes, which is produced by DSW, and seeks to represent a group of class members that would include all purchasers of potash or products containing potash. The period covered by the claim is from January 1, 2007 up to the approval date of the compromise agreement referred to below.

In January 2017, the District Court of the Central District – Lod approved the compromise agreement, the highlights of which are as follows:

1.The group of plaintiffs was defined as all the direct consumers, indirect consumers, farmers and end-users who acquired potash or a product in which potash is a component. It is clarified that Haifa Chemicals Ltd. and any party that acquired from it potash or its products in the downward supply chain are not included in the arrangement.

2.Compensation for past damages – DSW will pay the group of plaintiffs the amount of about $5.5 million as compensation in respect of the period covered by the claim.

3.Future arrangement – commencing from the date on which the court decision approving the compromise agreement becomes final, and up to the passage of 7 years therefrom, the price of the potash at the factory gate of DSW, without shipping and other expenses, shall not exceed the lower of: (a) US$400 per ton of potash, or (b) the average of the three cheapest prices at which DSW sold potash to its customers outside of Israel in the quarter preceding the sale in Israel, after such price is adjusted to the factory gate (“the Controlled Price”). The Controlled Price will apply to a base quantity of 20,000 tons of potash per year, while beyond this quantity DSW will have no restriction with respect to the price. It was further agreed that in connection with granulated potash, DSW will be entitled to charge up to an additional $20 per ton of potash in excess of the Controlled Price. With reference to packaged potash, Dead Sea Works will be entitled to charge the Controlled Price plus the average price charged to its foreign customers for packaging potash.

Personal Injury Claims

During the 1990s, several Group subsidiaries were sued by plaintiffs from various countries who worked mostly as banana plantation workers and who allege to have been injured by exposure to Di Bromo Chloropropane (‘‘DBCP’’), which was produced, many years ago by a number of manufacturers, including large chemical companies. As at the date of the report, the Group’s subsidiaries are parties to one legal proceeding by 9 plaintiffs who are requesting certification of their claim as a class action. The claims are for bodily injury and, therefore, the amount of the claims has not been stated. In the opinion of Company, it is not possible, at this stage, to estimate the outcome of the above claims due to their complexity and the multiple parties involved. However, the Company believes that the chances that the plaintiffs’ contentions will be accepted are lower than the chances they will rejected.


Environmental Claims

In June 2015, a request was filed for certification of a claim as a class action, in the District Court in Tel-Aviv–Jaffa, against eleven defendants, including a subsidiary, Fertilizers and Chemical Ltd., in respect of claims relating to air pollution in Haifa Bay and for the harm allegedly caused from it to the residents of the Haifa Bay area. The amount of the claim is about $3.8 billion. A preliminary hearing on the request was scheduled for April 30, 2017. In the Company’s estimation, based on the factual material provided to it and the relevant court decisions, the chances that the plaintiffs’ contentions will be rejected are greater than the chances they will be accepted.

Spain Mining License Matters

A.The subsidiary in Spain (hereinafter – "ICL Iberia") has two potash production centers – Suria and Sallent. As part of the efficiency plan, the Company intends to consolidate the activities of ICL Iberia on one site by means of expanding the Suria production site and discontinuing the mining activities on the Sallent site. The mining activities in Spain require an environmental mining license and an urban license.

Sallent site – in 2013, the Spanish Regional Court issued a judgment invalidating ICL Iberia's environmental mining license, contending that there were defects in provision of the license by the Government of Catalonia. In September 2015, the Spanish Supreme Court affirmed this judgment.

In 2014, the Regional Court also invalidated the urban license, contending that the license does not comply with the required conditions for piling up salt on the site (a by-product of the potash production process). In connection with the validity of the urban license, after issuance of the decision of the Supreme Court, the local planning board (CUCC) of the Catalonian government determined new provisions, which became effective upon the Supreme Court's approval in November 2015, including, limitation of the height of the salt pile and temporary extension of the salt piling activities up to the earlier of June 30, 2017 or when the salt pile reaches a height of about 538 meters. As at the date of the report, the height of the salt pile is 509 meters. In light of the said restrictions, continuation of the production activities on the Sallent site is contingent on finding a solution for treating the salt pile and the salt produced as part of the ongoing potash production process.

In November 2015, ICL Iberia signed a memorandum agreement for joint cooperation with the Government of Catalonia (hereinafter – “the Agreement”) that defines ICL Iberia’s activities in the country as preferential activities and the potash industry as a strategic public interest. The purpose of the agreement is, among other things, to arrange ICL Iberia's obligation to remove the salt pile on the Sallent site, including completion of the restoration plan of the site (see below) – all of which is to be completed no later than 2070 (removal of the salt pile is to be completed by 2065). At the end of 2016, a preliminary draft of the agreement was provided by the Government of Catalonia to all the parties involved for their comments. In February 2017, ICL Iberia submitted a request for approval of additional alternative solutions regarding the manner of handling the salt pile and extension of the period of the activities on the Sallent site beyond June 30, 2017. As at the date of the report, ICL Iberia's environmental mining license, had not yet been renewed by the Government of Catalonia.


Suria site – in April 2014, after a favorable survey was received from the Environmental Protection Authority in Catalonia, ICL Iberia received an environmental license that complies with the new environmental protection regulations in Spain (autoritzacio substantive), this being after ICL Iberia received the urban license.

Recently, it became clear that a number of technical problems found in the project with respect to the access tunnel to the Cabanasas mine (which is located on the Suria site) could delay its completion date. The Company is examining a number of alternatives for treatment and removal of the salt from this site.

Restoration plan – in 2015, in accordance with the provisions of the Spanish Environmental Protection Law, ICL Iberia submitted to the Government of Catalona a mining site restoration plan for the two production sites, Suria and Sallent, which includes, among other things, a plan for handling the salt piles and dismantling of facilities. The restoration plan for the Suria site is scheduled to run up to 2094, whereas the restoration plan for the Sallent site is scheduled to run up to 2070. During 2016, in light of talks held with the authorities in connection with the plan for treating the salt pile on the Sallent site, it was found that a number of changes in the plan are required with respect the water pumping process, which constitutes part of the removal plan.

As a result of that stated above, based on an updated estimate of the projected costs, the Company recognized a provision in its financial statements for 2016 in respect of the historical waste treatment costs, in the amount of $40 million, in the “other expenses” category.

B.In January 2016, following complaints from competitors in the salt market in Spain, the European Commission announced that it will investigate whether ICL Iberia received illegal aid from the Spanish authorities regarding two issues:

(1)Whether the guarantee amounts relating to environmental protection (the guarantees that are supposed to cover the potential cost of rehabilitation of the land), which were originally set at $2 million, are lower than the amount required by the EU and the national and regional environmental rules; and

(2)Whether ICL Iberia should bear the cost of the environmental protection measures, in the amount of about $9 million, which was financed by the Spanish authorities.

The Company disagrees with the above claims and given the preliminary stage of these proceedings, the legal measures that need to be taken are still being examined. However, in the Company’s estimation, based on its preliminary discussions with the Spanish authorities, the chances that the above claims will be rejected are higher than the chances that they will be accepted.


C.In the second half of 2016, a court decisions was rendered whereby ICL Iberia is solely responsible for contamination of the water in certain wells on the Suria site (due to an excess concentration of salt) and, therefore, it is liable for repair of the damages. As a result, based on management's estimate, the Company recorded a provision in its financial statements for 2016, in the amount of about $11 million.

Securities Law Proceedings

In 2013, a request for certification of a claim as a class action against the Company, Israel Corporation Ltd., Potashcorp Cooperative Agricultural Society Ltd., the members of the Company’s Board of Directors and its CEO, was filed in the District Court in Tel-Aviv, on the grounds of a misleading detail, deception and non-disclosure of a material detail in the Company’s reports, this allegedly being in violation of the provisions of the Securities Law and the general laws in Israel. In December 2016, the District Court in Tel-Aviv rejected the request for certification of a claim as a class action as stated. In addition, the Court ruled that plaintiff is to pay the Company and the other defendants part of the trial expenses and attorneys’ fees.

Derivative Actions

1.On July 10 and 19, 2016, two applications for the certification of derivative actions were filed with the Economic Division of the Tel-Aviv District Court by two of our shareholders, with respect to the annual bonuses granted for the years 2014 and 2015 to our top-five highest-paid senior officers, including our CEO and Chairman of the Board at the time, alleging that such bonuses were granted in a manner deviating from our compensation policy and contrary to the Company’s best interest.

The

On December 6, 2016, the Court issued an order to dismiss the first application at an estimated amount of NIS 18 million (approximately $5 million), was filed against our top-five highest paid senior officers and alternatively, against the members of our Compensation Committee, who approved the grantto proceed with deliberation of the aforementioned bonuses. The Company was requested to demand of the top-five highest paid senior officers to return all the bonuses, and should they fail to comply with this demand, file a claim against the aforementioned members of the Compensation Committee.

second application (the “Certification Application”).

The second application, at an estimated amount of NIS 21 million (approximately $6 million), was filed against the Company, the aforementioned top-five highest paid senior officers and the members of our Board of Directors, who approved the grant of said bonuses. The Court was requested to order our top-five highest paid senior officers and our other officers to return the bonuses paid to them. Alternatively, the Court was requested to compel the members of our Board of Directors to compensate the Company for damages incurred following the decision to approve these bonuses.

On December 6, 2016 the Court issued an order to dismiss the first application and to proceed with deliberation of the second application (the “Certification Application”).

On December 15, 2016, our Board of Directors decided to establish an independent external special committee, its members being Hon. Justice (ret.) Prof. Oded Mudrick, Prof. Sharon Hannes and Prof. Haim Assayag, CPA, to examine all aspects arising from the Certification Application and to formulate conclusions and recommendations to our Board of Directors, including with respect to the possibility of filing a claim by the Company based on the allegations made in the Certification Application (the “External Committee”).


On December 29, 2016, and in light ofApril 18, 2017 the decision of ourSpecial Committee report was delivered, wherein the Special Committee recommended objecting to the Certification Application. Following the Committee's report which was adopted by ICL's Board of Directors, on June 6, 2017, the Company and directors named as defendants infiled its response to the Certification Application, (former and/or current directors), filed a notice and motion relating to the establishment of the External Committee, wherein the Court was requested to orderapprove submission of the suspension and/or temporary postponement of proceedings in the Certification Application in order, among other things, to allow the Committee to examine all aspects arising from the Certification Application and to formulate its conclusions and recommendations to our Board of Directors.

Special Committee’s report. On January 15,December 25, 2017, the applicant in the Certification Application filed a reply to the motionhearing was held respecting the Committee, wherein he objectedrespondents’ motion to submit the motion being sustained,Special Committee’s report, and on January 25, 201715, 2018, the Court denied the Company’s request to submit the Special Committee’s report. Hence, on January 30, 2018, The Company filed an application for permission to appeal the decision, wherein it requested the Supreme Court to reverse the decision and rule that the Company and directors named as defendants inmay submit the Certification ApplicationSpecial Committee’s report. On May 2, 2018, the Supreme Court accepted the Company's appeal. Following the Supreme Court's decision, the Company filed their responsethe Committee's report to the replyDistrict Court. On July 1, 2018, the plaintiff appealed to the motion respectingDistrict Court to reveal certain documents that the Committee.

PursuantCompany filed to the decision given by the Court in light of the motion respecting the Committee and withto subpoena Hon. Justice (ret.) Prof. Oded Mudrick. On November 22, 2018, the applicant’s consent,court accepted the daterequest. The application is scheduled for filing the Company’s response to the Certification Application was postponed, athearings on June and July 2019.

At this stage, the company is unable to estimate the lapse of 24 days after a decision is given respectingrisks involved and the motion respecting the Committee.

On January 30, 2017 the Court ordered that the motion respecting the Committee will be heard on March 21 2017.

In light of the early stageoutcome of this proceeding, wherein a response has yet to be filed to the application for certification of the action as a derivative action, the chances and risks involved cannot be estimated.proceeding. However, in most cases, an application for certification of a derivative action, even if approved, does not constitute any exposure to the Company (rather to the contrary – if such action is sustained,sustaining it would actually enrich ourlead to enrichment of the Company’s coffers).

230

2.On December 8, 2016, the Company received a motion for disclosure and review of documents, in accordance with Section 198A of the Israeli Companies Law. The motion was filed toin the district courtDistrict Court in Tel Aviv by a shareholder of the Company, as a preliminary proceeding towards thean application of afor certification of a derivative action with regard to the waymanner of management and discontinuation of the Harmonization Project (the global ERP project), which he claimsclaimed allegedly led to the write-off of the amount invested in the project. AsOn January 17, 2018, the Court denied the motion and imposed upon the applicant the legal expenses incurred by the respondent and its attorneys’ fees. To the best of the dateCompany’s knowledge, on February 15, 2018 an application for permission to appeal was filed with the Supreme Court regarding the District Court’s decision to deny the motion. On October 11, 2018, the Supreme Court has rejected the application for permission to appeal, and imposed upon the applicant the legal expenses and attorney’s fees incurred by the respondent. For details regarding an application for certification of this annual report,a class action against the Company concerning ICL's IT (Harmonization) Project that was filed by the same shareholder, and for details regarding a law suit filed by the Company against IBM due to the Failure of the said IT Project, see Note 20 to our Audited Financial Statements.
3.On January 10, 2018, an application for certification of a derivative action was filed by a shareholder of Oil Refineries Ltd. (“Bazan”) with the Tel Aviv-Yafo District Court, against former and current board members of Bazan, OPC Energy Ltd. OPC Rotem Ltd., OPC Hadera Ltd. and the Company, (hereinafter, jointly: the “Additional Companies”), and against Israel Corporation Ltd., Mr. Idan Ofer and Mr. Ehud Angel (the “Application”).
The Application pertains to gas purchase transactions of the Company, Bazan and OPC, including the intercompany aspects thereof, which include a 2012 transaction involving Bazan for the purchase of natural gas from the Tamar gas field (the “Tamar Transaction”), as well as a transaction for the purchase of natural gas from Energean Israel Limited (the “Energean Transaction”). The Company’s engagement in the Energean Transaction was approved by the general meeting of our shareholders on February 22, 2018.
In a nut shell, the applicant argues that Bazan should have certify the Tamar Transaction as a "Controlling Shareholder" transaction and that the Company and OPC enjoyed Bazan's economical advantages in the Energean Transaction and thus must compensate it. On August 7, 2018, all the defendants filed their responses with the court. Preliminary hearing is scheduled for June 23, 2019.
In light of the early stage of this proceeding, the chances and risks involved cannot be estimated. However, on the surface it seems that the Company has good defense arguments.
4.
According to the announcement issued by the Company on May 10, 2017, ICL Europe Coöperatief U.A. (“ICL Europe”), a subsidiary of the Company, filed a Notice of Arbitration against the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia ("Ethiopia") under the Agreement of Encouragement and Reciprocal Protection of Investments between the Ethiopia and the Kingdom of the Netherlands ("the Ethiopia- Netherlands BIT"). A three-member arbitration tribunal ("Tribunal") was constituted under the Arbitration Rules of the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law ("UNCITRAL Rules") to hear the case, which is being administered by the Permanent Court of Arbitration located in The Hague, the Netherlands. Following ICL Europe's filing of Notice of Arbitration on May 10, 2017 and Ethiopia's response thereto on June 12, 2017, ICL Europe submitted to the courtTribunal on June 19, 2018 its responseStatement of Claim seeking compensation in the amount of $181 million plus interest for damage its claims as a result of Ethiopia's coercive, arbitrary, discriminatory and unlawful conduct, culminating in the imposition without legal basis of a purported tax on ICL Europe's indirectly owned Ethiopian company, Allana Potash Afar Plc, and Ethiopia's violation of multiple provisions of the Ethiopia- Netherlands BIT, including the requirements to accord fair and equitable treatment to ICL Europe's investment, to provide full protection and security to ICL Europe's investment and not to expropriate unlawfully ICL Europe's investment. Ethiopia submitted to the motion,Tribunal on October 19, 2018, its Statement of Defense and Objections to Jurisdiction. Among other things, Ethiopia argues that ICL Europe failed to make its investment in compliance with Ethiopian law and that the court hasTribunal lacks jurisdiction under the Ethiopia-Netherlands BIT as a result, that the challenged tax was lawful and does not renderedprovide a basis for presenting a claim under the Ethiopia- Netherlands BIT and that ICL terminated its decision yet.investment for reasons unrelated to any of the alleged unlawful acts and omissions of Ethiopia.

Commercial Proceedings

Haifa Chemicals acquires potash from DSW as part of its manufacturing inputs. In accordance with the agreement between DSW and Haifa Chemicals, the price which Haifa Chemicals was charged was according to the average FOB price of DSW to its two largest customers in the prior quarter. In 2008, the agreement between Haifa Chemicals and DSW was cancelled and the parties did not succeed in reaching a new agreement. Haifa Chemicals contends that DSW’s price for the potash is not fair and it is not able to operate at this price level. In May 2009, an arbitration proceeding between the parties commenced with respect to the price of the potash.

In October 2016, following discussions aimed at settling the disputes and demands between DSW and Haifa Chemicals, a final arbitration decision was rendered ending the arbitration was rendered – with the consent of both parties. All past disputes

For information regarding significant claims and legal claims currently pending between the parties relating to the principal arbitration award rendered in 2014 and referring to potash sales for the years 2009 to 2016, inclusive, will be dismissed. Set forth below are the highlights of the decision:


a.The arbitration award will be effective for thirteen years, commencing from January 1, 2017, and ending on December 31, 2029 (hereinafter – “the Arbitration Award Period”).

b.During the Arbitration Award Period, DSW will be obligated to sell an annual amount of 330,000 tonnes of potash to Haifa Chemicals (hereinafter – the Committed Quantities).

c.The selling prices of potash in relation to the Committed Quantities will apply as determined by the arbitrator, while distinguishing between the price for a base quantity of approximately 270,000 tonnes of potash and the price for an additional quantity of approximately 60,000 tonnes of potash. In addition, it was determined that commencing from January 2022, DSW will be entitled to request an adjustment to the formula of the selling price stipulated for the base quantity.

In light of that stated, the Company updated its provisions in an insignificant amount such that as at the date of the report, the total amount of the provision is $13 million.

Charges from the Israeli Public Utilities Authority Electricity

In 2015, the Israeli Public Utilities Authority – Electricity (hereinafter – "the Electricity Authority") resolved to impose certain electricity system management services charges also on private electricity producers as opposed to only on private consumers, this being retroactively from June 2013.

In August 2016, the Electricity Authority published a revision to its decision that gave rise to a reduction of the charges to the Company for the electricity system management services relating to prior periods. In light of that stated, during 2016, the Company reduced its provision by $16 million against the “other income” category in the statement of income.

ICL, DSW and Rotem filed a petition against the decision of the Electricity Authority contending that the decision suffers from significant flaws. On January 23, 2017, the Supreme Court sitting as the High Court of Justice issued a conditional order against the State of Israel with reference to the “retroactive” charges. The State was required to submit its response affidavit in connection with the retroactive charges for 2013 and 2014 within 30 days of the above date.


Water Matters Petition

In 2015, an appeal was filed in the Israeli Court for Water Matters by Man Nature and Law wherein the Court was requested to order the Government Water and Sewage Authority to issue a production license to DSW pursuant to the Water Law with respect to the transfer of water from the North Basin of the Dead Sea to the evaporation ponds in the Sea’s South Basin in order to regulate and supervise, within the framework of the production license, transfer of the water, as stated, in connection with certain aspects, including limitation of the quantities transferred. Recently, the Government Water and Sewage Authority issued directives to DSW (not in the framework of the production license), after hearing the latter’s position regarding transfer of the water, as stated, which included, reference to quantities and reporting requirements. In January 2017, the Court rejected the appeal. On January 30, 2017, Man Nature and Law filed an appeal on the Court’s decision, as stated.

In addition to the contingent liabilities, as stated above, as at the date of the report, the contingent liabilities regarding the matter of environmental protection and legal claims,proceeding, which are pending against the Group, are in immaterial amounts. It is noted that part of the above claims is covered by insurance. In the Company’s estimation, the provisions recognized in its books are sufficient.

see Note 20 to our Audited Financial Statements.

231

Dividend policy

In May 2016,

On March 6, 2018 our Board of Directors decided to update ourrevisited the dividend distribution policy that was previously approved in light of our efforts to strengthen our financial positionMay 2016, and in light of the ongoing volatility and uncertaintyresolved that in the agricultural commodities market. In 2016years 2018 and 20172019 our dividend distribution rate shall continue to constitute up to 50% of the adjusted annual net profit as compared(compared to our previous dividend distribution policy of up to 70% of net profit. This is an additional measure designed to strengthen our financial position andprofit, as was in light of the ongoing volatility and uncertaintyplace until revised in the agricultural commodities market. The said update to our dividend distribution policy was intended to increase our shareholders’ certainty as relates to the distribution of dividends, while maintaining our financial stability.May 2016). Our Board of Directors will revisit this policy once market conditions stabilize. There is no assurance that our Boardupon conclusion of Directors will make any changes to the updated policy.said period. In addition, dividends will be paid out inasmuch as declared by our Board of Directors and may be discontinued at any time. Such changes could include either a reduction in the amount or the targeted dividend, or modification of the calculation formula.

All decisions respecting dividend distribution are made by our Board of Directors, which takes into accountconsiders a variety of factors, including our profits, ability to pay our debt and obligations, investment plans, financial state and other factors, as it sees fit.applicable. The distribution of a dividend is not assured and our Board of Directors may decide, at its sole discretion, at any time and for any reason, not to distribute a dividend, to reduce the rate thereof, to distribute a special dividend, to change the dividend distribution policy or to adopt a share buy-back plan.

The amount of distributable profits as of December 31, 20162018 amounted to $2,2583,483 million. The terms of certain of our existing liabilities require us to maintain a minimum level of the Company’s equity, which could restrict our ability to pay dividends in the future. See Note 15C15D to our audited financial statementsAudited Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding covenants in our loan agreements and their impact on our ability to pay dividends. In addition, the distribution of dividends is limited by Israeli law, which permits the distribution of dividends only out of distributable profits and only if there is no reasonable concern that such distribution will prevent us from meeting our existing and future obligations when they become due. Generally, dividends paid by an Israeli company are subject to an Israeli withholding tax. For a discussion of certain tax considerations affecting dividend payments, see “Item 10.10 - Additional Information—E. Taxation.”

Taxation”.

B. SIGNIFICANT CHANGES


To the best of our knowledge, no significant changes have occurred since the date of our consolidated financial statements.

232

Item 9 – THE OFFER AND LISTING

A. OFFER AND LISTING DETAILS

New York Stock Exchange

The following table sets forth, the annual, quarterly and monthly range of the highest closing price and the lowest closing price of the Company's shares as they were reported by the New York Stock Exchange:

 USD price per
ordinary share
 HighLow
Year Ended December 31:  
2015 7.704.01
2016 5.023.52
   
Year Ended December 31, 2015:  
Fourth Quarter 5.864.01
Year Ended December 31, 2016:  
First Quarter 4.523.68
Second Quarter 5.023.76
Third Quarter 4.343.70
Fourth Quarter 4.273.52
Year Ended December 31, 2017:  
First Quarter (through March 14) 4.85 4.04
   
Month Ended:  
September 30, 2016 4.343.83
October 31, 2016 3.933.53
November 30, 2016 3.933.52
December 31, 2016 4.273.90
January 31, 2017 4.854.04
February 28, 2017 4.594.16
March 31, 2017 (through March 14)--

On March 14, 2017, the last reported sale price of our ordinary shares on the New York Stock Exchange was $4.34 per share.


Tel Aviv Stock Exchange

The following table shows the annual, quarterly and monthly ranges of the high and low per share sales price for our ordinary shares as reported by the TASE in NIS and U.S. dollars. U.S. dollar per ordinary share amounts are calculated using the U.S. dollar representative rate of exchange on the date to which the high or low market price is applicable, as reported by the Bank of Israel.

 NIS price per
ordinary share
USD price per
ordinary share
  HighLowHighLow
Year Ended December 31:    
2012 50.10 38.22 12.949.82
2013 51.75 24.48 13.876.74
2014 31.97 25.01 9.216.36
2015 29.80 15.55 7.683.98
2016 18.87 13.36 5.013.51
     
Year Ended December 31, 2015:    
First Quarter 29.80 27.15 7.686.81
Second Quarter 29.48 25.41 7.486.69
Third Quarter 27.03 19.00 7.124.83
Fourth Quarter 22.75 15.55 5.843.98
Year Ended December 31, 2016:    
First Quarter 17.55 14.51 4.503.68
Second Quarter 18.87 14.70 5.013.77
Third Quarter 16.33 14.40 4.323.70
Fourth Quarter 16.51 13.36 4.323.51
Year Ended December 31, 2017:    
First Quarter (through March 14)18.2515.464.824.11
     
Month Ended:    
September 30, 2016 16.25 14.51 4.303.86
October 31, 2016 14.64 13.55 3.863.51
November 30, 2016 15.13 13.36 3.913.51
December 31, 2016 16.51 14.89 4.323.90
January 31, 2017 18.25 15.85 4.824.11
February 28, 2017 17.78 15.50 4.744.21
March 31, 2017 (through March 14)16.9215.464.594.19

On March 14, 2017, the last reported sale price of our ordinary shares on the TASE was NIS 15.80 per share, or $4.32 per share (based on the exchange rate reported by Bank of Israel on such date, which was NIS 3.66 = $1.00).

A.OFFER AND LISTING DETAILS

Not applicable. 
B. PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION


Not applicable. 

C. MARKETS


Our ordinary shares are listed on the NYSE and on the TASE under the symbol “ICL.” 

D. SELLING SHAREHOLDERS


Not applicable. 

E. DILUTION


Not applicable. 

F. EXPENSES OF THE ISSUE


Not applicable. 

Item 10 – ADDITIONAL INFORMATION


A. SHARE CAPITAL

As of December 31, 2015,2018, our authorized share capital consisted of 1,484,999,999 ordinary shares, par value NIS 1 per share, of which 1,300,979,5381,304,890,778 ordinary shares were issued and outstanding (including shares held by us or our subsidiaries), and 1 Special State Share, par value NIS 1 per share, issued and outstanding. All of our outstanding shares have been lawfully issued and are fully paid and are non-assessable.paid. As of December 31, 2016, 24,590,0412018, 24,589,836 ordinary shares were held by us or our subsidiaries. Shares acquired by our subsidiaries prior to February 2000 have both economic rights and voting rights. However, in accordance with Israeli law, ordinary shares issued to our subsidiaries or purchased by our subsidiaries after February 2000 have economic rights but not voting rights. Shares held by us have no economic rights or voting rights. Therefore, out of the ordinary shares held by us or our subsidiaries, 24,590,04124,589,836 have no voting rights.

As of December 31, 2016,2018, an additional about 17quantity of approximately 18.9 million ordinary shares were issuable upon the exercise of outstanding options granted to our officers and employees at a weighted average exercise price of approximately ILS 20.54 NIS 27.71(about $5.48) per share. The weighted average exercise price of the outstanding vested options is approximately ILS 18.53 (about $4.94) per share. For additional information about the issuance of options and restricted shares to officers and senior employees and their exercise in 2015-2016,2017-2018, as well as the allocation of restricted shares to directors and approval of the issuance of restricted shares to directors, on December 23, 2015 and January 3, 2017, see Note 21 to our audited financial statementsAudited Financial Statements and “Item 6.6 - Directors, Senior Management and Employees—E. Share Ownership”.
.233


In 2014, 2015 and 2016, no2018, approximately 0.7 million options under our equity compensation plansplants were exercised.


exercised into approximately 0.15 million ordinary shares. In 2015, 2 million of our ordinary shares2016 and 2017, no options were allocated to Liberty Metals & Mining Holdings ("Liberty") as part of the completion of the acquisition of 100% of Allana Potash Corporation. The Company shares allocated to Liberty represent about 0.17% of the Company’s outstanding shares and voting rights.

exercised.

In September 2014, we completed the initial public offering of our ordinary shares in the United States, pursuant to which Israel Corporation sold 36 million ordinary shares and certain forward counterparties sold 24 million ordinary shares to hedge their positions under forward sale agreements covering up to 36 million ordinary shares owned by Israel Corporation. Subsequent to the closing of the initial public offering, the underwriters exercised their option to purchase an additional 6 million ordinary shares from Israel Corporation.  We did not issue any ordinary shares in connection with the initial public offering or receive any proceeds from the sale of our ordinary shares by Israel Corporation or the forward counterparties. Israel Corporation ceased to have voting rights with respect to the ordinary shares subject to the forward sale agreements and made available to the forward counterparties under those agreements. However, Israel Corporation will regain voting rights with respect to all or a portion of the ordinary shares it makes available to the forward counterparties under the forward sale agreements to the extent it elects a cash settlement or a net physicalshare settlement. Settlement under the forward sale agreements is scheduled to occur on various dates between 2016 and 2019.

B. MEMORANDUM, ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION AND SPECIAL STATE SHARE

Our shareholders adopted the Articles of Association attached as Exhibit 3.2 to our registration statement on Form F-1 (File no. 333-198711) filed with the SEC on September 12, 2014.

We incorporate by reference into this Annual Report the description of our Amended and Restated Articles of Association, which became effective upon the closing of our IPO on the NYSE, contained in our F-1 registration statement (File No. 333-198711) originally filed with the SEC on September 12, 2014, as amended. Such description sets forth a summary of certain provisions of our Articles of Association as currently in effect.

The State of Israel holds a nontransferable Special State Share in ICL in order to preserve the State’s vital interests. Any change in the provisions of our Articles of Association relating to the rights attached to the Special State Share requires approval from the State of Israel. The Special State Share grants its holder the rights described below.

The sale or transfer of material assets of the Company (in Israel) or granting any other rights in the abovementioned assets, not in the ordinary course of our business, whether in one transaction or in a series of transactions, shall be invalid. Unless it received the approval of the holder of the Special State Share how may oppose the transfer of a material asset as stated above only if, in its opinion, such transfer is likely to harm one of the “State’s vital interests”. Restrictions are also imposed on voluntary liquidation, mergers and reorganizations, excluding certain exceptions enumerated in our Articles of Association.


234

In addition, without the approval of the holder of the Special State Share, any acquisition or holding of 14% or more of our outstanding share capital is not valid. In addition, any acquisition or holding of 25% or more of our outstanding share capital (including an increase of holdings to 25%) is not valid without the approval of the holder of the Special State Share, even if in the past the approval of the holder of the Special State Share had been received for ownership of less than 25%. Our Articles of Association set forth procedures required to be followed by a person who intends to acquire shares in an amount that would require the approval of the holder of the Special State Shares. A pledge over shares is treated like an acquisition of shares. As a condition to voting at any shareholders’ meeting, each interested party in the Company, including a holder of 5% or more of our outstanding shares, will be required to certify in writing that the voting power derived from the holding of shares does not require the approval of the holder of the Special State Share or that such approval has been obtained.

In addition to the aforesaid, the approval of the holder of the Special State Share is required for the ownership of any shares that grant their holder the right, ability or practical potential to appoint directly or indirectly 50% or more of our directors, and such appointments will not be valid as long as that approval has not been obtained.

The holder of the Special State Share has the right to receive information from us, as provided in our Articles of Association. Our Articles of Association also provide that the holder of the Special State Share will use this information only to exercise its rights under the Articles of Association for purposes of protecting the State’s vital interests.

Our Articles of Association also impose a periodic reporting obligation on us for the benefit of the holder of the Special State Share, regarding all asset-relatedasset‑related transactions approved by our Board of Directors during the three months prior to the date of the report, any changes in share capital ownership and any voting agreements among the Company’s shareholders signed during that period.

The following are the “State’s vital interests” as defined in our Articles of Association for purposes of the Special State Share:

To preserve the character of the Company and its subsidiaries ICL Dead Sea, ICL Rotem, Dead Sea Bromine Company, Bromine Compounds and Tami as Israeli companies whose centers of business and management are in Israel. In our estimation, this condition is met.

To monitor the control over minerals and natural resources, for purposes of their efficient development and utilization, including maximum utilization in Israel of the results of investments, research and development.

To prevent acquisition of a position of influence in the Company or the foregoing Israeli subsidiaries by hostile entities or entities likely to harm foreign relations or security interests of the State of Israel.

To prevent acquisition of a position of influence in the Company or the foregoing Israeli subsidiaries or management of such companies, whereby such acquisition or management might create a situation of significant conflicts of interest likely to adversely affect any of the vital interests enumerated above.

Furthermore, our headquarters and the ongoing management and control over our business activities must be in Israel. The majority of the members of our Board of Directors must be citizens and residents of Israel. In general, meetings of our Board of Directors mustare to take place in Israel.


235

Other than the rights enumerated above, the Special State Share does not grant the holder any voting or equity rights.

The State of Israel also holds a Special State Share in the following ICL subsidiaries: ICL Dead Sea, Dead Sea Bromine Company, ICL Rotem, Bromine Compounds, Tami and Dead Sea Magnesium. The rights granted by these shares according to the Articles of Association of these subsidiaries are substantially similar to the rights enumerated above. The full provisions governing the rights of the Special State Share appear in our Articles of Association and in the Articles of Association of the said subsidiaries and are available for the public’s review. We report to the State of Israel on an ongoing basis in accordance with the provisions of our Articles of Association. Certain asset transfer or sale transactions that in our opinion require approval, have received the approval of the holder of the Special State Share.

To the best of our knowledge, an inter-ministry team has recently been established, headed by the Ministry of Finance, tasked with arranging the issue of authority and oversight relating to special state shares, interest decrees and reduction of the regulatory burden. As at the date hereof, we are unable to estimate what implications this process would have on the Company, if any, but it is possible that the introduction of an additional array of regulatory provisions, coupled with strict enforcement, may increase the uncertainty in the management of the Company operations relating to natural resources in Israel and may have a material adverse effect on our business, our financial condition and results of operations.
C. MATERIAL CONTRACTS


Except as otherwise disclosed in this Annual Report, we are not currently, and have not been in the last two years, party to any material contract, other than contracts entered into in the ordinary course of business.

For additional information on divestitures currently in progress, see “Item 3 - Key Information— A. Selected Financial Data”.

D. EXCHANGE CONTROLS


There are currently no Israeli currency control restrictions on the payments of dividends or other distributions with respect to our ordinary shares or the proceeds from the sale of the shares, except for the obligation of Israeli residents to file reports with the Bank of Israel regarding certain transactions. However, legislation remains in effect pursuant to which currency controls can be imposed by administrative action at any time.

236

E.  TAXATION

Israeli Tax Considerations

A.  Taxation of companies in Israel

1. Measurement of results for tax purposes under the Income Tax law (Adjustments for inflation), 1985

The Income Tax Law (Adjustments for Inflation) – 1985 (hereinafter – the Law), which is effective as from the 1985 tax year, introduced the concept of measurement of results for tax purposes on a real (net of inflation) basis. On February 26, 2008, the Knesset enacted the Income Tax Law (Adjustments for Inflation) (Amendment No. 20) (Restriction of Commencement Period), 2008, whereby the effective period of the Inflationary Adjustments Law ceased at the end of the 2007 tax year and the depreciation of property, plant and equipment, is adjusted up to the end of the 2007 tax year, and from this time forward their linkage will be discontinued.


The Income Tax Regulations Adjustments for Inflation (Rates of Depreciation), 1986, which allow depreciation at rates different than those in Section 21 of the Income Tax Ordinance, apply even after the Law is no longer in effect, and therefore the Company continues to claim accelerated depreciation, in certain situations, on the basis of these Regulations.

2. Income tax rates

Presented hereunder are the tax rates relevant to the Company in the years 2014–2016:

2014 – 26.5%

2015 – 26.5%

2016–2018 and after:

2016 – 25%

On January 4, 2016, the plenary Knesset passed the Law for Amendment of the Income Tax Ordinance (No. 216), 2016 which provides, inter alia, for a reduction of the Companies Tax rate commencing from January 1, 2016

2017 – 24%
2018 and thereafter by the rate of 1.5% such that the rate will be 25%.

In addition, onafter 23%

On December 22, 2016 the Israeli Knesset plenary Knesset passed the Economic Efficiency Law (Legislative Amendments for Achieving the Budget Targets for 2017 and 2018), 2016, which provides, among other things, for a reduction of the Companies Tax rate from 25% to 23% in two steps – the first step to the rate of 24% commencing from 2017 and the second step to the rate of 23% commencing from 2018 and thereafter, along with reduction of the tax rate applicable to “Preferred Enterprises” (see A.3.bA.2.b below) regarding factories in the peripheral suburban areas, from 9% to 7.5%, as part of amendment of the Law for Encouragement of Capital Investments.

The balances of the deferred taxes were updated in accordance with the new tax rates, as stated, which are expected to apply when the differences reverse. As a result of that stated, in the financial statements for 2016, the Company reduced the balances of the liabilities for deferred taxes, in the amount of $40 million, and the balances of the deferred taxes assets, in the amount of $7 million, against deferred tax income, in the amount of $32 million and against equity, in the amount of $1 million.

The current taxes for the periods reported are calculated in accordance with the tax rates shown in the table above.

3.

2. Tax benefits under the Israeli Law for the Encouragement of Capital Investments, 1959 (hereinafter – “thethe Encouragement Law”)

a)Beneficiary Enterprises

Law)

a) Beneficiary Enterprises
The production facilities of some of the Company’s subsidiaries in Israel (hereinafter – “the Subsidiaries”)the Subsidiaries) have received “Beneficiary Enterprise” status under the Encouragement law, as worded after Amendment No. 60 to the Law published in April 2005.

The benefits granted to the company are mainly:

1) Reduced tax rates

Regarding the “tax exemption” track, the

The Company chose 2005 as the election year whereas regarding the “Ireland” track, which is subject to tax at the rate of 11.5%, the Company chose 2008 as the election year.


a "tax exemption" track. The benefits deriving from a “Beneficiary Enterprise” under the "tax exemption"this track ended in 2014 while2014. Within those years the benefits deriving Company benefited from the "Ireland" track will endreduced tax rates as well as in 2017.

some cases full tax exemption.

A company having a “Beneficiary Enterprise” that distributes a dividend out of exempt income, will be subject to Companies Taxcompanies tax in the year in which the dividend was distributed on the amount distributed (including the amount of the Companies Taxcompanies tax applicable due to the distribution) at the tax rate applicable under the Encouragement Law in the year in which the income was produced, had it not been exempt from tax.

The

As at December 31, 2018, the temporary difference related to distribution of a dividend from exempt income, as at December 31, 2016, in respect of which deferred taxes were not recognized, is in the amount of about $625$650 million (see also Section A.3.c below).

of distributable amount and about $162 million of derived taxes.

237

Under the “Ireland” track, the company paid reduced tax rate of 11.5% as of 2008 on parts of its income. The benefit deriving from the "Ireland" track ended in 2017.
The part of the taxable income entitled to benefits at reduced tax rates is calculated based on the basis of the ratio of the turnover of the “BenefitedBeneficiary Enterprise” to the Company’s total turnover. The turnover attributed to the “BenefitedBeneficiary Enterprise” is generally calculated according to the increase in the turnover compared to a “base” turnover, which is the average turnover in the three years prior to the year of election of the “BenefitedBeneficiary Enterprise”.

2) Accelerated depreciation

In respect of buildings, machinery and equipment used by the Approved Enterprise, the Company is entitled to claim accelerated depreciation as provided by law, commencing from the year each asset is placed in service.

b) Preferred Enterprises

On December 29, 2010, the Israeli Knesset approved the Economic Policy Law for 2011-2012,2011‑2012, whereby the Encouragement law, was amended (hereinafter – “the Amendment”)the Amendment). The Amendment is effective from January 1, 2011 and its provisions will apply to preferred income derived or accrued by a Preferred Enterprise, as defined in the Amendment, in 2011 and thereafter.

The Amendment does not apply to an Industrial Enterprise that is a mine, other facility for production of minerals or a facility for exploration of fuel. Therefore, ICL plants that are defined as mining plants and mineral producers will not be able to take advantage of the tax rates included as part of the Amendment. In addition, on August 5, 2013, the Law for Change in the Order of National Priorities, 2013, was passed by the Knesset, which provides that the tax rate applicable to a Preferred Enterprise in Development Area A will be 9% whereas the tax applicable to companies in the rest of Israel will be 16%. Pursuant to the amendment to the Encouragement law that was approved as part of the Economic Efficiency Law (Legislative Amendments for Achieving the Budget Targets for 2017 and 2018), 2016,,the tax rate applicable to enterprises in the suburban areas was reduced from 9% to 7.5%.

The Company has Preferred Enterprises at the tax rate of 7.5%.

On November 30, 2015, the Economic Efficiency Law was passed by the Knesset, which expanded the exception to all of anthe Enterprise’s activities up to the time of the first marketable product (for additional details – see Section 54 below). Nonetheless, tax benefits to which a BenefitedBeneficiary Plant is entitled will not be cancelled in respect of investments up to December 31, 2012. Therefore, those plants will be able to utilize the tax benefits in respect of qualifying investments made up to December 31, 2012, in accordance with the provisions of the old law.


It is further provided in the Amendment that tax will not apply to a dividend distributed out of preferred income to a shareholder that is an Israeli-residentIsraeli‑resident company. A dividend distributed out of preferred income to a shareholder that is an individual or a foreign resident is subject to tax at the rate of 20%, unless a lower tax rate applies under a relevant treaty for prevention of double taxation.

c) Trapped Earnings Law – Temporary Order

On November 5, 2012, the Israeli Knesset passed Amendment No. 69 and Temporary Order to the Encouragement Law (hereinafter – “the Temporary Order”), which offers a reduced tax rate arrangement to companies that received an exemption from Companies Tax under the aforesaid law. The Temporary Order provides that companies that choose to apply the Temporary Order (effective for one year), will be entitled to a reduced tax rate on the “release” of exempt profits. A company that elected to pay a preferential Companies Tax rate is required to invest in an industrial factory up to 50% of the tax savings it realized, during a period of 5 years, commencing from the year of the notice. Non-compliance with this condition will result in a charge to the Company for additional tax.

The Company applied the Temporary Order in 2013. Pursuant to the Company's decision and as required by the Temporary Order, up to December 31, 2014, the Company made the full amount of its required investment in an industrial factory.

4.

3. The Law for the Encouragement of Industry (Taxation), 1969

a) Some of the Company’s Israeli subsidiaries are “Industrial Enterprise”, as defined in the above-mentionedabove‑mentioned law.

In respect of buildings, machinery and equipment owned and used by any "Industrial Enterprise", the Company is entitled to claim accelerated depreciation as provided by the Income Tax Regulations – Adjustments for Inflation (Depreciation Rates), 1986 which allow accelerated depreciation to any "Industrial Enterprise" as of the tax year in which each asset is first placed in service.

238

b) The industrialIndustrial Enterprises owned by some of the Company's Israeli subsidiaries have a common line of production and, therefore, they file, together with the Company, a consolidated tax return in accordance with Section 23 of the Law for the Encouragement of Industry. Accordingly, each of the said companies is entitled to offset its tax losses against the taxable income of the other companies.

c) During 2016, based on the alternatives for filing tax reports in certain jurisdictions, the Company decided to file separate (non-consolidated) tax reports for various subsidiaries. As a result, the Company updated the balance of the liabilities for deferred taxes against recording of tax income, in the amount of $27 million.

5.

4. The Law for Taxation of Profits from Natural Resources

On November 30, 2015, the Knesset passed the

The Law for Taxation of Profits from Natural Resources (hereinafter – "the Law")the Law), which entered into effect onis effective since January 1, 2016, except with respect to DSW regarding which the effective date is January 1, 2017.2016. The government take on natural resources in Israel includes three elements: Royalties, Natural Resources Tax and Companies Income Tax. The highlights of the Law are set forth below:

The total tax on natural resources in Israel will include three tax elements: royalties, Natural Resources Tax and Companies Tax.


Royalties:

The

Royalties:
In accordance with the Mines Ordinance, the rate of the royalties, in connection with resources produced from the quarries, in accordance with the Mines Ordinance will be 5% (with respect to. For production of the phosphates, the royalty rate will beis 5% of the value of the quantity produced – instead of 2%). produced.
Pursuant to the salt harvesting agreement signed with the Government onin July 8, 2012, the parties agreed, among other things,inter‑alia, to an increase in the rate of the royalties from 5% to 10% of the sales, for every quantityquantities of chloride potash chloride sold by the Company in a given year,DSW sells in excess of a quantity of 1.5 million tons. As part oftonnes annually.
In addition, the salt harvesting agreement it was providedstates that if a lawlegislation is enacted that changes the specific fiscal policy in connection with reference to profits or royalties deriving from quarryingthe mining of quarries from the Dead Sea, the Company's consent to the increase of the royalties' rate on the surplus quantities referred to above will not apply, after the enactment of the royalties,legislation, to the period in which such additional tax is collected as stated will not apply. Thein the said legislation. In January 2016, the Law entered into effect on January 1, 2016.and accordingly the rate of the royalties' provision was updated to 5%. For additional details –information - see Note 20C.20C to the financial statements.

our Audited Financial Statements.

Imposition of Natural Resources Tax:

The Natural Resources Tax is applied for all minerals from 2016 and for Potash from 2017. The tax base, which will be calculated for every resourcemineral separately, is the Company’smineral’s operating income in accordance with the accounting statement of income, to which certain adjustments will be made, less financing expenses at the rate of 5% of the Company’smineral’s average working capital, and less an amount that reflects a yield of 14% on the property, plant and equipment used for production and sale of the quarried material (hereinafter – “thethe Yield on the Property, Plant and Equipment”)Equipment). On the tax base, as stated, a progressive tax will be imposed at a rate to be determined based on the Yield on the Property, Plant and Equipment in that year. For the Yield on the Property, Plant and Equipment between 14% and 20%, Natural Resources Tax will be imposed at the rate of 25%, while the yield in excess of 20% will be subject to Natural Resources Tax at the rate of 42%.

In years in which the Natural Resources Tax base is negative, the negative amount will be carried forward from year to year and will constitute a tax shield in the succeeding tax year. The above computations, including the right to use prior years’ losses, are made separately, without taking into account setoffs, for each natural resource production and sale activity.

239

Limitations on the Natural Resources Tax – the Natural Resources Tax will only apply to profits deriving from the actual production and sale of each of the following resources: potash, bromine, magnesium and phosphates, and not to the profits deriving from the downstream industrial activities. Calculation of the Natural Resources Tax will be made separately for every resource.mineral. Nonetheless, regarding Magnesium, it was provided that commencing from 2017, upon sale of carnalite by DSW to Magnesium and reacquisition of a Sylvanite by-productSylvinite by‑product by DSW, Magnesium will charge DSW $100 per tontonne of potash which is produced from the SylvaniteSylvinite (linked to the CPI).

A mechanism was provided for determination of the market price with respect to transactions in natural resources executed between related parties in Israel, as well as a mechanism for calculation of the manner for allocation of the expenses between the production and sale of the natural resource, on the one hand, and the downstream activities, on the other hand.

Regarding the bromine resource, the Natural Resources Tax will apply in the same manner in which it applies to the other natural resources, except with respect to the manner of determining the transfer price in sales made to related parties in and outside of Israel. For purposes of calculating the total revenues from bromine sold to related parties for purposes of downstream manufacturing activities in every tax year, a calculation method will be employed (Netback) whereby the price will be determined based on the higher of the following:


1) The price for a unit of bromine (ton)(tonne) provided in the transaction;

2) The normative price of a unit of bromine. The normative price of a unit of bromine is the total sales of the downstream products produced less the operating expenses attributable to the downstream activities, without the acquisition cost of the bromine, and less an amount equal to 12% of the total revenues of the downstream products produced as part of the downstream activities, where the result is divided by the number of bromine units used to produce the downstream products sold.

Regarding the phosphate resource, for purposes of calculating the total revenues from phosphate sold to related parties for purposes of downstream manufacturing activities in every tax year, a calculation method will be employed (Netback) whereby the price will be determined based on the higher of the following:

1) The price for a unit of phosphate (ton)(tonne) provided in the transaction;

2) The normative price of a unit of phosphate. The “normative price” of a unit of phosphate is the total sales of the downstream products produced less the operating expenses attributable to the downstream activities, without the acquisition cost of the phosphate rock, and less an amount equal to 12% of the total revenues of the downstream products produced as part of the downstream activities, where the result is divided by the number of phosphate units used to produce the downstream products sold.

3) The production and operating costs attributable to a unit of phosphate.

The Company took a tax filing position, according to which, all the Dead Sea minerals should be taxed as a unified mineral under the above-mentioned mechanism.
240

Companies Tax:

The Law for Encouragement of Capital Investments was revised such that the definition of a “Plant for Production of Quarries” will include all the plant’s activities up to production of the first marketable natural resource, of potash, bromine, magnesium and phosphates. Accordingly, activities involved with production of the resource will not be entitled to tax benefits under the Law, whereas activities relating to downstream products, such as bromine compounds, acids and fertilizers, will not constitute a base for calculating the Excess Profits Tax and will not be exceptedexempted from inclusion in the Law.

The Natural Resource Tax will be deductible from the Company's taxable income and the Company will pay the Companies Tax on the balance as is customary in Israel.

Taxation of Investors

The following are material Israeli income tax consequences to investors of acquiring and disposing of our ordinary shares. That stated does not purport to be a comprehensive description of all the tax considerations that may be relevant to a particular person’s decision to acquire and/or dispose the ordinary shares.

Capital Gains Tax

Israeli law generally imposes a capital gains tax on the sale of capital assets by residents of Israel, as defined for Israeli tax purposes, and on the sale of capital assets located in Israel, including shares of Israeli companies, by non-residentsnon‑residents of Israel, unless a specific exemption is available or unless a tax treaty between Israel and the shareholder’s country of residence provides otherwise. The law distinguishes between real gain and inflationary surplus. The inflationary surplus is a portion of the total capital gain that is equivalent to the increase of the relevant asset’s purchase price which is attributable to the increase in the Israeli consumer price indexConsumer Price Index or a foreign currency exchange rate between the date of purchase and the date of sale. The real gain is the excess of the total capital gain over the inflationary surplus.


Israeli Residents

Generally, as of January 1, 2012, the tax rate applicable to capital gains derived from a sale of shares, whether listed on a stock market or not, is the regular corporate tax rate in Israel of 25% (commencing from January 1, 2017 – 24% and commencing from January 1, 2018 – 23%) for Israeli companies and 25% for Israeli individuals, unless such shareholder claims a deduction for financing expenses in connection with such shares, in which case the gain will generally be taxed at a rate of 30%. Additionally, if suchindividual shareholder is considered a “significant shareholder” at any time during the 12-month12‑month period preceding such sale, the tax rate will be 30%. A “significant shareholder” is defined as one who holds, directly or indirectly, including together with others, at least 10% of any means of control in the company. However, different tax rates will apply to dealers in securities. Israeli companies are subject to the corporate tax rate on capital gains derived from the sale of listed shares.

As of January 1, 2013, shareholders who are individuals with taxable income that exceeds NIS 800,000 in a tax year (linked to the Israeli consumer price index each year – NIS 810,720 for 2016 and commencing from January 1, 20172018 taxpayers having taxable income of NIS 640,000)641,880 or above in a certain tax year will be subject to an additional tax payment at the rate of 2% (and commencing from January 1, 2017 – an additional tax payment at the rate of 3%) on the portion of their taxable income for such tax year that is in excess such threshold. For this purpose, taxable income includes inter alia taxable capital gains from the sale of our shares and taxable income from dividend distributions.

Non-Israeli

241

Non‑Israeli Residents

Non-Israeli

Under the domestic tax law, non‑Israeli residents are generally exempt from Israeli capital gains tax on any gains derived from the sale of shares of Israeli companies publicly traded on a recognized stock exchange outside Israel, so long as such shareholders did not acquire their shares prior to the company’s initial public offering and the gains did not derive from a permanent establishment of such shareholders in Israel. However, shareholders that are non-Israelinon‑Israeli corporations will not be entitled to such exemption if Israeli residents hold an interest of more than 25% in such non-Israelinon‑Israeli corporation or are the beneficiaries or are entitled to 25% or more of the revenues or profits of such non-Israelinon‑Israeli corporation, whether directly or indirectly.

In certain instances where our shareholders may be liable to Israeli tax on the sale of their ordinary shares, the payment of the consideration may be subject to the withholding of Israeli tax at the source.

In addition, pursuant to the Convention between the Government of the United States of America and the Israeli government with respect to Taxestaxes on Income,income, as amended, or the U.S.-IsraelU.S.‑Israel Tax Treaty, the sale, exchange or disposition of ordinary shares by a person who qualifies as a resident of the United States within the meaning of the U.S.-IsraelU.S.‑Israel Tax Treaty and who is entitled to claim the benefits afforded to such person by the U.S.-IsraelU.S.‑Israel Tax Treaty generally will not be subject to the Israeli capital gains tax unless such person holds, directly or indirectly, shares representing 10% or more of our voting power during any part of the 12-month12‑month period preceding such sale, exchange or disposition, subject to particular conditions, or the capital gains from such sale, exchange or disposition can be allocated to a permanent establishment in Israel or is considered to be derived from or sale of Israeli real property interests for purposes of the U.S.-IsraelU.S.‑Israel Tax Treaty. If a U.S. investor is not exempt from Israeli taxes under the U.S.-IsraelU.S.‑Israel Tax Treaty, such U.S. investor may be subject to Israeli tax, to the extent applicable as described above; however, under the U.S.-IsraelU.S.‑Israel Tax Treaty, such person may be permitted to claim a credit for such taxes against the U.S. federal income tax imposed with respect to such sale, exchange or disposition, subject to the limitations in the U.S. laws applicable to foreign tax credits. The U.S.-IsraelU.S.‑Israel Tax Treaty does not relate to U.S. state or local taxes.


Taxation of Dividend Distributions

Israeli Residents

Israeli resident individuals are generally subject to Israeli income tax on the receipt of dividends paid on our ordinary shares, other than bonus shares (share dividends). The tax rate applicable to such dividends is 25% or 30% for a shareholder that is considered a significant shareholder at any time during the 12-month12‑month period preceding such distribution. Dividends paid from income derived from Approved Enterprises or Benefited Enterprises are subject to withholding at the rate of 15%. Dividends paid from income derived from Preferred Enterprises are subject to withholding at the rate of 20%.

Israeli resident companies are generally exempt from tax on the receipt of dividends paid on our ordinary shares (excluding dividends paid from income derived from Approved or Benefited Enterprises).

Non-Israeli

242

As of January 1, 2018 taxpayers having taxable income of NIS 641,880 or above in a certain tax year will be subject to an additional tax payment at the rate 3% on the portion of their taxable income for such tax year that is in excess such threshold.
Non‑Israeli Residents

Non-residents

Non‑residents of Israel are subject to income tax on income accrued or derived from sources in Israel, including dividends paid by Israeli companies. On distributions of dividends other than stock dividends, income tax (generally collected by means of withholding) will generally apply at the rate of 25%, or 30% for a shareholder that is considered a significant shareholder (as defined above) at any time during the 12-month12‑month period preceding such distribution, unless a different rate is provided in a treaty between Israel and the shareholder’s country of residence. Dividends paid from income derived from Approved or Benefited Enterprises are subject to withholding at the rate of 15%, or 4% for Benefited Enterprises in the Ireland Track. Dividends paid from income derived from Approved or Preferred Enterprises will be subject to withholding at the rate of 20%.

Under the U.S.-IsraelU.S.‑Israel Tax Treaty, the maximum tax on dividends paid to a holder of ordinary shares who qualifies as a resident of the United States within the meaning of the U.S.-IsraelU.S.‑Israel Tax Treaty is 25%. The treaty provides for reduced tax rates on dividends if (a) the shareholder is a U.S. corporation holding at least 10% of our issued voting power during the part of the tax year that precedes the date of payment of the dividend and held such minimal percentage during the whole of its prior tax year, and (b) not more than 25% of the Israeli company’s gross income consists of interest or dividends, other than dividends or interest received from subsidiary corporations or corporations 50% or more of the outstanding voting shares of which is owned by the Israeli company. The reduced treaty rate, if applicable, is 15% in the case of dividends paid from income derived from Approved, Benefited or Preferred Enterprise or 12.5% otherwise.


Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations for U.S. Holders

The following are material U.S. federal income tax consequences to the U.S. Holders described below of owning and disposing of our ordinary shares, but it does not purport to be a comprehensive description of all the tax considerations that may be relevant to a particular person’s decision to hold the ordinary shares. This discussion applies only to a U.S. Holder that holds the ordinary shares as capital assets for U.S. federal income tax purposes. In addition, it does not describe all of the tax consequences that may be relevant in light of a U.S. Holder’s particular circumstances, including alternative minimum tax consequences, any aspect of the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) commonly known as the Medicare tax and tax consequences applicable to U.S. Holders subject to special rules, such as:

·
certain financial institutions;

·
dealers or traders in securities that use a mark-to-market method of tax accounting;

·
persons holding ordinary shares as part of a “straddle” or integrated transaction or persons entering into a constructive sale with respect to the ordinary shares;

·
persons whose functional currency for U.S. federal income tax purposes is not the U.S. dollar;

243

·
entities classified as partnerships for U.S. federal income tax purposes;

·
tax exempt entities, “individual retirement accounts” or “Roth IRAs";:

·Persons who acquired our ordinary shares pursuant to the exercise of an employee stock option or otherwise as compensation;

·persons that own or are deemed to own 10% or more of our voting stock;stock by vote or value; or

·persons holding our ordinary shares in connection with a trade or business conducted outside of the United States.

If an entity that is classified as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes owns ordinary shares, the U.S. federal income tax treatment of a partner will generally depend on the status of the partner and the activities of the partnership. Partnerships owning ordinary shares and partners in such partnerships should consult their tax advisers as to the particular U.S. federal tax consequences of owning and disposing of the ordinary shares.

This discussion is based on the Code, administrative pronouncements, judicial decisions, and final and proposed Treasury regulations, changes to any of which subsequent to the date of this Annual Report  may affect the tax consequences described herein.

For purposes of this discussion, a “U.S. Holder” is a person who, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, is a beneficial owner of ordinary shares and is:

·
a citizen or individual resident of the United States;

·a corporation, or other entity taxable as a corporation, created or organized in or under the laws of the United States, any state therein or the District of Columbia; or

·
an estate or trust the income of which is subject to U.S. federal income taxation regardless of its source.


U.S. Holders should consult their tax advisers concerning the U.S. federal, state local tax and non-U.S. consequences of owning and disposing of our ordinary shares in their particular circumstances.

This discussion assumes that we are not, and will not become, a passive foreign investment company, as described below.

Taxation of Distributions

Distributions paid on our ordinary shares, other than certain pro rata distributions of ordinary shares, will be treated as dividends to the extent paid out of our current or accumulated earnings and profits (as determined under U.S. federal income tax principles). Because we do not calculate our earnings and profits under U.S. federal income tax principles, it is expected that distributions generally will be reported to U.S. Holders as dividends. Subject to applicable limitations, dividends paid to certain non-corporate U.S. Holders may be taxable at the favorable tax rates applicable to “qualified dividend income”. Non-corporate U.S. Holders should consult their tax advisers regarding the availability of these favorable rates on dividends in their particular circumstances. Dividends will not be eligible for the dividends received deduction generally available to U.S. corporations under the Code. Dividends will generally be included in a U.S. Holder’s income on the date of receipt. Dividend income will include any amounts withheld by us in respect of Israeli taxes, and will be treated as foreign source income for foreign tax credit purposes. If any dividend is paid in NIS, the amount of dividend income will be the dividend’s U.S. dollar amount calculated by reference to the exchange rate in effect on the date of receipt, regardless of whether the payment is in fact converted into U.S. dollars. If the dividend is converted into U.S. dollars on the date of receipt, a U.S. Holder should not be required to recognize foreign currency gain or loss in respect of the dividend income. A U.S. Holder may have foreign currency gain or loss if the dividend is converted into U.S. dollars after the date of receipt. Such gain or loss would generally be treated as U.S.-source ordinary income or loss. Subject to applicable limitations, some of which vary depending upon the U.S. Holder’s circumstances, Israeli taxes withheld from dividends on our ordinary shares will be creditable against the U.S. Holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability. The rules governing foreign tax credits are complex, and U.S. Holders should consult their tax advisers regarding the creditability of foreign taxes in their particular circumstances. In lieu of claiming a foreign tax credit, U.S. Holders may, at their election, deduct foreign taxes, including Israeli taxes, in computing their taxable income, subject to applicable limitations. An election to deduct foreign taxes instead of claiming foreign tax credits applies to all foreign taxes paid or accrued in the taxable year.

244

Sale or Other Taxable Disposition of Ordinary Shares

For U.S. federal income tax purposes, gain or loss realized on the sale or other taxable disposition of our ordinary shares will be capital gain or loss, and will be long term capital gain or loss if the U.S. Holder held the ordinary shares for more than one year. The amount of the gain or loss will equal the difference between the U.S. Holder’s tax basis in the ordinary shares disposed of and the amount realized on the disposition, in each case as determined in U.S. dollars. This gain or loss will generally be U.S. source gain or loss for foreign tax credit purposes. The deductibility of capital losses is subject to limitations.

Passive Foreign Investment Company Rules

In general, a non-U.S. corporation will be a “passive foreign investment company” (a “PFIC”) for any taxable year if (i) 75% or more of its gross income consists of passive income or (ii) 50% or more of the average quarterly value of its assets consists of assets that produce, or are held for the production of, passive income. For purposes of the above calculations, a non-U.S. corporation that directly or indirectly owns at least 25% by value of the shares of another corporation is treated as if it held its proportionate share of the assets of the other corporation and received directly its proportionate share of the income of the other corporation. Passive income generally includes dividends, interest, rents, royalties and gains from transactions in commodities (other than certain active business gains from the sales of commodities).


Based on the manner in which we operate our business, we believe that we were not a PFIC  for 2015.2018. However, because PFIC status depends on the composition and character of a company’s income and assets and the value of its assets from time to time, there can be no assurance that we will not be a PFIC for any taxable year.

If we were a PFIC for any taxable year during which a U.S. Holder held ordinary shares, gain recognized by a U.S. Holder on a sale or other disposition (including certain pledges) of the ordinary shares would be allocated ratably over the U.S. Holder’s holding period for the ordinary shares. The amounts allocated to the taxable year of the sale or other disposition and to any year before we became a PFIC would be taxed as ordinary income. The amount allocated to each other taxable year would be subject to tax at the highest rate in effect for individuals or corporations, as appropriate, for that taxable year, and an interest charge would be imposed on the resulting tax liability for each such taxable year. Further, any distribution in respect of ordinary shares in excess of 125% of the average of the annual distributions received by a U.S. Holder during the preceding three years or the U.S. Holder’s holding period, whichever is shorter, would be subject to taxation in the same manner. Certain elections may be available that would result in alternative treatments (such as mark-to-market treatment) of the ordinary shares in the case that we were a PFIC for any taxable year.

245

If we were a PFIC for any taxable year during which a U.S. Holder owned ordinary shares, the  U.S. Holder generally will be required to file annual reports on Internal Revenue Service Form 8621. In addition, the favorable tax rates described above with respect to dividends paid to certain non-corporate U.S. Holders would not apply if we were a PFIC for the taxable year of distribution or the preceding taxable year.

Information Reporting and Backup Withholding

Payments of dividends and sales proceeds that are made within the United States or through certain U.S. related financial intermediaries generally are subject to information reporting, and may be subject to backup withholding, unless (i) the U.S. Holder is a corporation or other exempt recipient or (ii) in the case of backup withholding, the U.S. Holder provides a correct taxpayer identification number and certifies that it is not subject to backup withholding. Backup withholding is not an additional tax.

The amount of any backup withholding from a payment to a U.S. Holder will be allowed as a credit against the U.S. Holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability and may entitle it to a refund, provided that the required information is timely furnished to the Internal Revenue Service.

Certain U.S. Holders who are individuals (and(or certain entities controlled by individuals)specified entities) may be required to report information relating to their ownership of securities of non-U.S. issuers, such as our ordinary shares, unless the securities are held in accounts at financial institutions (in which case the accounts may be reportable if maintained by non-U.S. financial institutions). U.S. Holders should consult their tax advisers regarding their reporting obligations with respect to the ordinary shares


F. DIVIDENDS AND PAYING AGENTS


Not applicable.

G. STATEMENT BY EXPERTS


Not applicable.

246

H. DOCUMENTS ON DISPLAY


In light of the listing of our ordinary shares for trade on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) within the framework of an initial public offering executed in 2014, we are subject to the informational requirements of the US Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Accordingly, we are required to file or furnish reports and other information with the SEC pursuant to the requirements applying to foreign issuers, including annual reports on Form 20-F and reports on Form 6-K. You may inspect and copy reports and other information filed with or furnished to the SEC at the Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. In addition, theThe SEC maintains a website that contains reports and other information about issuers, like us, that file electronically with the SEC.  The address of that website is www.sec.gov.

I. SUBSIDIARY INFORMATION


The Company and its subsidiaries do not maintain any direct or indirect connection with Iran or with enemy nations (as defined in the Israel Trade with the Enemy Ordinance - 1939).

Item 11 – QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Risk Management

In the ordinary course of our business activities, we are exposed to various market risks that are beyondnot at our control, including fluctuations in the prices of certain of our products and inputs, currency exchange rates, interest rates, energy prices and marine shipping prices, that may have an adverse effect on the value of our financial assets and liabilities, future cash flows and profit. As a result of these market risks, we could suffer a loss due to adverse changes insuch as the prices of our products or our inputs, foreign exchange rates, interest rates, energy prices or marine shipping prices.


For financial assets and financial liabilities in currencies that are not the functional currency of our subsidiaries, our policy is to try and minimize this exposure as farmuch as possible by the use ofusing various hedging instruments. We do not currently hedge against some severance pay liabilities or our tax resultsbalances since the exposure isthey are long term. Weterm exposures. In addition, we do not use hedging instruments to hedge the prices of our products. For hedging against the pricesprice changes of crude oil,energy products and marine shipping prices,costs, projected income and expenses in currencies that are not the functional currency of our subsidiaries, and interest rates, our policy is to hedge part of the exposure, as described below.

We regularly monitor the extent of our exposure and the hedging activities and rates for the various risks described below. TheWe execute hedging policy for all types of exposure is discussed by our Board of Directors as part of the annual budget discussions, and our Board of Directors establishes our maximum exposureactivities according to a value-at-risk model. Together with a report on the quarterly financial results, our Audit and Finance Committee receives quarterly reports on exposure and hedging rates and determines if our hedging policy should be revised. Management implements our hedging policy with reference to the actual developments and expectations in the various markets.

We use financial instruments and derivatives for hedging purposes only. These hedging instruments reduce our exposure as described above. TheseSome of these transactions do not meet the hedging conditions provided in IFRS, and therefore they are measured at fair value, and changes in the fair value are charged immediately to profit and loss.earnings. The counterparties for our derivatives transactions are banks.banks or financial institutes. We believe the credit risk in respect thereof is negligible.

small.

247

For additional information about our hedging activities, see Note 23 to our audited financial statements.

Audited Financial Statements.

Exchange Rate Risk

The U.S. dollar is the principal currency of the business environment in which most of our subsidiaries operate. The majorityMost of our activities—sales, purchase of materials, selling, marketing expenses and financing expenses, as well as the purchase of property, plant and equipment—are executed mainly in U.S. dollars, and so the U.S. dollar is used as the functional currency for measurement and reporting of the Company and the majoritymost of our subsidiaries.

We have a number ofseveral consolidated subsidiaries, overseas and one local subsidiary in Israel, whose functional currencies are their local currency—mainly the euro, the British pound, the Brazilian real, the Israeli shekel and the Chinese yuan.

Set forth below is a description of our principal exposures in respect of changes in currency exchange rates.

Transactions by our subsidiaries in currencies that are not their functional currency expose us to changes in the exchange rates of those currencies compared with the functional currencies of those companies. Measurement of this type of our exposure is based on the ratiosurplus of net income toor expenses in each currency that is not the functional currency of that company.

Part of the costs of our inputs in Israel are denominated and paid in NIS. Thus, we are exposed to a strengthening of the NIS exchange rate against the U.S. dollar (NIS appreciation)revaluation). This exposure is similar in substance to the exposure described above for transactions in foreign currencies but is much larger than the other currency exposures.


The results for tax purposes of usfor the Company and ourits subsidiaries operating in Israel are measured in NIS. As a result, we are exposed to the rate of the change in the U.S. dollar exchange rate and the measurement base for tax purposes (the NIS) in respect of those subsidiaries.

these companies.

Our subsidiaries have severance pay liabilities that are denominated in the local currency, and in Israel they are sometimes also affected by rises in the CPI. Our subsidiaries in Israel have reserves to cover part of these liabilities. The reserves are denominated in NIS and affected by the performance of the funds in which the sums are invested. As a result, we are exposed to changes in the exchange rates of the U.S. dollar against various local currencies in respect of net liabilities for severance pay.

Our subsidiaries have financial assets and liabilities that are denominated in or linked to currencies other than their functional currencies. A surplus of assets over liabilities denominated in currencies that are not the functional currency creates exposure for us in respect of exchange rate fluctuations.

With respect to investment

For Investment in subsidiaries whose functional currency is not the U.S. dollar, the end-of-period balance-sheet balancesend of period balance sheet accounts of these companies are translated into U.S. dollars based on the exchange rate of the U.S. dollar in relation to the reporting currency of these companies at the end of the relevant period. The beginning-of-period balance-sheetbeginning of period balance sheet balances, as well as capital changes during the period, are translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rate at the beginning of the period or on the date of the change in capital, respectively. The differences arising from the effect of the change in the exchange rate between the U.S. dollar and the currency in which the companies report create exposure. The effects of this exposure are charged directly to equity.

Our Finance Forum (whose members are the senior financial managers of our Company and each of our segments)

248

We examine periodically examines the extent of the hedging transactions implemented forto hedge each of the exposures described above and decides on the required scope of the hedging.hedging within the hedging policy frame. We use various financial instruments for our hedging activity, including derivatives.

Explanations of the main changes between the periods

Exchange rate:

The liability in respect of

As at December 31, 2018, the positive fair value of the derivative instruments with respect to exchange rates was about $12 million compared to a positive fair value of $63 million as at December 31, 2015 amounted2017. As a result, in 2018, an expense of about $51 million was recorded with respect to about $1 million. these transactions.
Energy:
As at December 31, 2016,2018, the asset in respect of thenegative fair value of the derivative instruments with respect to energy costs was about $8 million. As$3 million compared to a result of income was recorded in the amount of about $9 million with reference to open transactions.

Energy:

The liability in respect of thepositive fair value of derivative instruments for energy costs$2.2 million as at December 31, 2015 amounted2017. As a result, in 2018, an expense of about $5.2 million was recorded with respect to about $6.6 million, due to the decline in the price of crude oil in 2015 at the rate of 40%. these transactions.

Dry bulk marine shipping:
As at December 31, 2016,2018, the asset in respect of thenegative fair value of the derivative instruments was about $3.6 million. As a result, an income was recorded in the amount of about $10.2 million with referencerespect to open transactions.


Dry bulk marine shipping:

The liability in respect of the fair value of derivative instruments for dry bulk marine shipping was about $2.3 million compared to a positive fair value of $1.9 million as at December 31, 2015 amounted to about $4.6 million, due to the decline in the marine shipping prices in 2015 at the rate of 37%. As at December 31, 2016, the asset in respect of the fair value of the derivative instruments was about $0.4 million.2017. As a result, in 2018, an incomeexpense of about $4.2 million was recorded in the amount of about $5 million with referencerespect to openthese transactions.

249

The tables below set forth the sensitivity of our derivative instruments and certain balance sheet items to 5% and 10% increases and decreases in the exchange rates as at December 31, 2016.


 Increase (decrease)
in fair value
Fair valueIncrease (decrease)
in fair value
USD/NIS$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions
Type of instrumentIncrease of 10%Increase of 5% Decrease of 5%Decrease of 10%
Cash and cash equivalents(0.2)(0.1)1.80.10.2
Short term deposits and  loans0.00.00.30.00.0
Trade receivables(5.0)(2.5)50.32.55.0
Receivables and debit balances(0.5)(0.2)4.90.20.5
Long-term deposits and loans0.00.00.30.00.0
Credit from banks and others3.21.6(32.0)(1.6)(3.2)
Trade payables20.110.0(200.8)(10.0)(20.1)
Other payables20.410.2(204.3)(10.2)(20.4)
Long-term loans14.37.5(156.9)(8.3)(17.4)
Fixed rate debentures (series E)36.919.3(405.5)(21.3)(45.1)
Options(62.5)(27.6)(2.1)21.253.7
Forward(43.9)(23.0)0.025.453.6
Swap(57.5)(30.1)3.333.370.2
Total(74.7)(34.9)(940.7)31.377.0
      
      
 Increase (decrease)
in fair value
Fair valueIncrease (decrease)
in fair value
CPI$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions
Type of instrumentIncrease of 10%Increase of 5% Decrease of 5%Decrease of 10%
Long-term deposits and loans0.00.00.30.00.0
Short term deposits and  loans0.00.00.20.00.0
      
      
 Increase (decrease)
in fair value
Fair valueIncrease (decrease)
in fair value
EUR/USD$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions
Type of instrumentIncrease of 10%Increase of
5%
 Decrease of 5%Decrease of 10%
Cash and cash equivalents(2.2)(1.1)21.61.12.2
Short term deposits and  loans0.00.00.50.00.0
Trade receivables(19.9)(10.0)199.310.019.9
Receivables and debit balances0.00.00.40.00.0
Long-term deposits and loans(0.1)0.00.80.00.1
Credit from banks and others10.05.0(100.0)(5.0)(10.0)
Trade payables16.18.0(160.8)(8.0)(16.1)
Other payables5.92.9(58.8)(2.9)(5.9)
Long-term loans from banks15.27.6(151.6)(7.6)(15.2)
Options4.32.02.0(1.8)(3.2)
Forward14.97.13.5(6.4)(12.2)
Total44.221.5(243.1)(20.6)(40.4)

253 

2018.
 
 Increase (decrease)
in fair value
Fair valueIncrease (decrease)
in fair value
GBP/USD$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions
Type of instrumentIncrease of 10%Increase of
5%
 Decrease of 5%Decrease of 10%
Cash and cash equivalents(0.2)(0.1)2.00.10.2
Trade receivables(3.6)(1.8)35.71.83.6
Receivables and debit balances0.00.00.00.00.0
Credit from banks and others2.11.1(21.2)(1.1)(2.1)
Trade payables2.31.1(22.6)(1.1)(2.3)
Other payables1.00.5(9.6)(0.5)(1.0)
Options(2.1)(1.4)(0.8)(0.3)0.2
Forward1.00.51.3(0.4)(0.8)
Total0.5(0.1)(15.2)(1.5)(2.2)
      
      
 Increase (decrease)
in fair value
Fair valueIncrease (decrease)
in fair value
GBP/EUR$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions
Type of instrumentIncrease of 10%Increase of
5%
 Decrease of 5%Decrease of 10%
Options(1.9)(0.9)(0.3)0.40.9
      
      
 Increase (decrease)
in fair value
Fair valueIncrease (decrease)
in fair value
JPY/USD$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions
Type of instrumentIncrease of 10%Increase of
5%
 Decrease of 5%Decrease of 10%
Cash and cash equivalents(0.2)(0.1)1.60.10.2
Trade receivables(0.7)(0.3)7.00.30.7
Long-term deposits and loans0.00.00.20.00.0
Trade payables0.00.0(0.5)0.00.0
Other payables0.00.0(0.1)0.00.0
Options0.30.10.3(0.1)(0.2)
Forward0.30.20.0(0.2)(0.4)
Total(0.3)(0.1)8.50.10.3

254 

Increase (decrease)
in fair value
Fair value
Increase (decrease)
in fair value
USD/NIS$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions
Type of instrumentIncrease of 10%Increase of 5%Decrease of 5%Decrease of 10%
Cash and cash equivalents (0.2) (0.1) 1.8 0.1 0.2
Short term deposits and  loans 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0
Trade receivables (5.5) (2.9) 60.2 3.2 6.7
Receivables and debit balances (1.1) (0.6) 11.8 0.6 1.3
Long-term deposits and loans
 (0.1)
 (0.1)1.50.10.2
Credit from banks and others 2.8 1.4 (30.3) (1.6) (3.4)
Trade payables 24.1 12.6 (265.1) (14.0) (29.5)
Other payables 17.5 9.2 (192.3) (10.1) (21.4)
Long-term loans 6.6 3.5 (73.0) (3.8) (8.1)
Fixed rate debentures (series E) 38.8 20.3 (426.8) (22.5) (47.4)
Options (74.8) (40.9) (13.8) 19.1 43.4
Forward (32.0) (16.7) 1.6 18.5 39.1
Swap (47.6) (24.9) 14.7 27.6 58.2
Total (71.5) (39.2) (909.6) 17.2 39.3

 
 Increase (decrease)
in fair value
Fair valueIncrease (decrease)
in fair value
BRL/USD$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions
Type of instrumentIncrease of   10%Increase of
5%
 Decrease of 5%Decrease of 10%
Cash and cash equivalents(0.4)(0.2)4.00.20.4
Trade receivables(2.7)(1.4)27.11.42.7
Trade payables0.90.4(8.8)(0.4)(0.9)
Other payables0.20.1(1.6)(0.1)(0.2)
Long-term loans from banks4.52.2(44.6)(2.2)(4.5)
Total2.51.1(23.9)(1.1)(2.5)
      
      
 Increase (decrease)
in fair value
Fair valueIncrease (decrease)
in fair value
CNY/USD$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions
Type of instrumentIncrease of   10%Increase of
5%
 Decrease of   5%Decrease of 10%
Cash and cash equivalents(3.8)(1.9)38.21.93.8
Trade receivables(8.4)(4.2)83.94.28.4
Trade payables10.75.4(107.3)(5.4)(10.7)
Other payables1.70.9(17.4)(0.9)(1.7)
Credit from banks and others16.48.2(164.4)(8.2)(16.4)
Forward2.61.41.3(1.5)(3.2)
Long-term loans (CNY)8.74.3(87.0)(4.3)(8.7)
Total27.914.1(252.7)(14.2)(28.5)

Increase (decrease)
in fair value
Fair value
Increase (decrease)
in fair value
EUR/USD$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions
Type of instrumentIncrease of 10%
Increase of
5%
Decrease of 5%Decrease of 10%
Cash and cash equivalents (1.9) (1.0) 21.3 1.1 2.4
Short term deposits and  loans (0.2) (0.1) 2.7 0.1 0.3
Trade receivables (20.2) (10.6) 221.9 11.7 24.7
Receivables and debit balances (1.1) (0.6) 11.7 0.6 1.3
Long-term deposits and loans (0.1) (0.1) 1.1 0.1 0.1
Credit from banks and others 15.1 7.9 (166.4) (8.8) (18.5)
Trade payables 17.1 8.9 (187.6) (9.9) (20.8)
Other payables 4.2 2.2 (46.0) (2.4) (5.1)
Long-term loans from banks 0.5 0.3 (5.4) (0.3) (0.6)
Options 4.6 2.1 1.3 (1.8) (3.7)
Forward 9.5 4.5 2.5 (4.1) (7.7)
Swap 33.6 16.8 (1.0) (16.8) (33.6)
Total 61.1 30.3 (143.9) (30.5) (61.2)


250

Increase (decrease)
in fair value
Fair value
Increase (decrease)
in fair value
GBP/USD$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions
Type of instrumentIncrease of 10%
Increase of
5%
Decrease of 5%Decrease of 10%
Cash and cash equivalents (0.4) (0.2) 4.4 0.2 0.5
Trade receivables (5.5) (2.9) 60.3 3.2 6.7
Receivables and debit balances 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0
Credit from banks and others 1.7 0.9 (18.7) (1.0) (2.1)
Trade payables 2.1 1.1 (22.7) (1.2) (2.5)
Other payables 0.6 0.3 (6.6) (0.3) (0.7)
Options (1.3) (0.6) (0.1) 0.4 0.8
Forward (3.5) (1.7) 0.3 1.5 2.9
Total (6.3) (3.1) 17.3 2.8 5.6

Increase (decrease)
in fair value
Fair value
Increase (decrease)
in fair value
GBP/EUR$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions
Type of instrumentIncrease of 10%
Increase of
5%
Decrease of 5%Decrease of 10%
Forward (3.7) (1.9) 0.3 2.1 4.5

Increase (decrease)
in fair value
Fair value
Increase (decrease)
in fair value
BRL/USD$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions
Type of instrumentIncrease of   10%
Increase of
5%
Decrease of 5%Decrease of 10%
Cash and cash equivalents (0.5) (0.2) 5.0 0.3 0.6
Trade receivables (2.3) (1.2) 25.2 1.3 2.8
Trade payables 1.0 0.5 (10.9) (0.6) (1.2)
Other payables 0.2 0.1 (2.2) (0.1) (0.2)
Long-term loans from banks 1.7 0.9 (19.1) (1.0) (2.1)
Total 0.1 0.1 (2.0) (0.1) (0.1)

Increase (decrease)
in fair value
Fair value
Increase (decrease)
in fair value
CNY/USD$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions
Type of instrumentIncrease of   10%
Increase of
5%
Decrease of   5%Decrease of 10%
Cash and cash equivalents (3.4) (1.8) 37.2 2.0 4.1
Trade receivables (6.5) (3.4) 71.5 3.8 7.9
Trade payables 6.5 3.4 (71.9) (3.8) (8.0)
Other payables 1.8 0.9 (19.4) (1.0) (2.2)
Credit from banks and others 16.7 8.8 (184.0) (9.7) (20.4)
Forward (2.6) (1.4) (0.1) 1.5 3.2
Long-term loans (CNY) 0.1 0.0 (0.7) 0.0 (0.1)
Total 12.6 6.5 (167.4) (7.2) (15.5)


251

The tables below set forth the sensitivity of our derivative instruments and certain balance sheet items to 5% and 10% increases and decreases in the exchange rates as at December 31, 2015.

 Increase (decrease)
in fair value
Fair valueIncrease (decrease)
in fair value
USD/NIS$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions
Type of instrumentIncrease of 10%Increase of 5% Decrease of 5%Decrease of 10%
Cash and cash equivalents(0.2)(0.1)1.70.10.2
Short term deposits and  loans(0.1)0.00.70.00.1
Trade receivables(5.2)(2.6)51.72.65.2
Receivables and debit balances(0.7)(0.3)6.60.30.7
Long-term deposits and loans(0.1)0.00.90.00.1
Trade payables20.110.0(200.6)(10.0)(20.1)
Other payables15.47.7(153.8)(7.7)(15.4)
Long-term loans15.17.9(165.8)(8.7)(18.4)
Options(57.8)(24.5)(0.6)25.459.5
Forward(11.9)(6.2)(0.16)6.914.6
Swap(16.7)(8.8)(4.0)9.720.4
Total(42.1)(16.9)(463.4)18.646.9
      
      

 Increase (decrease)
in fair value
Fair valueIncrease (decrease)
in fair value
CPI$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions
Type of instrumentIncrease of 10%Increase of 5% Decrease of 5%Decrease of 10%
Long-term deposits and loans0.10.00.90.0(0.1)
      
      
 Increase (decrease)
in fair value
Fair valueIncrease (decrease)
in fair value
EUR/USD$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions
Type of instrumentIncrease of 10%Increase of
5%
 Decrease of 5%Decrease of 10%
Cash and cash equivalents(2.3)(1.1)22.61.12.3
Short term deposits and  loans(0.4)(0.2)4.10.20.4
Trade receivables(21.9)(10.9)218.610.921.9
Receivables and debit balances(0.1)0.00.70.00.1
Long-term deposits and loans0.00.00.30.00.0
Credit from banks and others9.14.5(90.5)(4.5)(9.1)
Trade payables15.47.7(154.5)(7.7)(15.4)
Other payables11.45.7(114.5)(5.7)(11.4)
Long-term loans from banks3.51.8(36.7)(1.8)(3.5)
Options4.21.81.1(1.4)(3.4)
Forward(26.7)(12.6)(0.6)11.421.8
Total(7.8)(3.3)(149.4)2.53.7
      
      
 Increase (decrease)
in fair value
Fair valueIncrease (decrease)
in fair value
GBP/USD$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions
Type of instrumentIncrease of 10%Increase of
5%
 Decrease of 5%Decrease of 10%
Trade receivables(3.7)(1.9)37.51.93.7
Receivables and debit balances0.00.00.10.00.0
Credit from banks and others1.60.8(16.0)(0.8)(1.6)
Trade payables3.41.7(33.9)(1.7)(3.4)
Other payables3.81.9(37.6)(1.9)(3.8)
Options(0.2)(0.1)0.00.00.0
Forward28.113.31.7(12.0)(23.0)
Total32.515.5(43.2)(14.3)(27.6)

256 

2017.
 
 Increase (decrease)
in fair value
Fair valueIncrease (decrease)
in fair value
GBP/EUR$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions
Type of instrumentIncrease of 10%Increase of
5%
 Decrease of 5%Decrease of 10%
Forward(18.0)(9.4)2.910.421.9
Options(0.6)(0.3)0.00.30.7
Total(18.6)(9.7)2.910.722.6
      
      
 Increase (decrease)
in fair value
Fair valueIncrease (decrease)
in fair value
JPY/USD$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions
Type of instrumentIncrease of 10%Increase of
5%
 Decrease of 5%Decrease of 10%
Cash and cash equivalents(0.4)(0.2)3.90.20.4
Trade receivables(1.0)(0.5)9.90.51.0
Long-term deposits and loans0.00.00.20.00.0
Trade payables0.10.0(0.6)0.0(0.1)
Other payables0.00.0(0.3)0.00.0
Options0.20.10.0(0.2)(0.4)
Forward0.30.2-(0.2)(0.4)
Total(0.8)(0.4)13.10.30.5
      
      
 Increase (decrease)
in fair value
Fair valueIncrease (decrease)
in fair value
BRL/USD$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions
Type of instrumentIncrease of   10%Increase of
5%
 Decrease of 5%Decrease of 10%
Cash and cash equivalents(0.2)(0.1)2.10.10.2
Trade receivables(2.5)(1.3)25.11.32.5
Trade payables1.30.7(13.3)(0.7)(1.3)
Other payables0.10.1(1.4)(0.1)(0.1)
Long-term loans from banks3.11.6(31.2)(1.6)(3.1)
Total1.81.0(18.7)(1.0)(1.8)
      
      
 Increase (decrease)
in fair value
Fair valueIncrease (decrease)
in fair value
CNY/USD$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions
Type of instrumentIncrease of   10%Increase of
5%
 Decrease of   5%Decrease of 10%
Cash and cash equivalents(8.3)(4.1)82.74.18.3
Trade receivables(10.2)(5.1)102.35.110.2
Trade payables12.26.1(122.1)(6.1)(12.2)
Other payables2.21.1(21.7)(1.1)(2.2)
Credit from banks and others28.214.1(282.0)(14.1)(28.2)
Options0.00.00.00.35.2
Forward(19.0)(9.9)(0.2)11.023.2
Total5.12.2(241.0)(0.8)4.3

257 

Increase (decrease)
in fair value
Fair value
Increase (decrease)
in fair value
USD/NIS$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions
Type of instrumentIncrease of 10%Increase of 5%Decrease of 5%Decrease of 10%
Cash and cash equivalents (0.1) (0.1) 1.4 0.1 0.1
Short term deposits and loans 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0
Trade receivables (5.9) (3.0) 59.0 3.0 5.9
Receivables and debit balances (3.9) (2.0) 39.4 2.0 3.9
Credit from banks and others 3.3 1.6 (32.7) (1.6) (3.3)
Trade payables 28.9 14.4 (288.8) (14.4) (28.9)
Other payables 9.6 4.8 (96.3) (4.8) (9.6)
Long-term loans 7.8 4.1 (86.0) (4.5) (9.6)
Fixed rate debentures (series E) 42.8 22.4 (470.9) (24.8) (52.3)
Options (35.6) (9.1) 3.2 20.5 50.0
Forward (39.1) (20.5) 1.8 22.7 47.8
Swap (52.9) (27.4) 64.0 31.7 66.2
Total (45.1) (14.8) (806.0) 29.9 70.2

 

Increase (decrease)
in fair value
Fair value
Increase (decrease)
in fair value
EUR/USD$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions
Type of instrumentIncrease of 10%
Increase of
5%
Decrease of 5%Decrease of 10%
Cash and cash equivalents (1.8) (0.9) 17.9 0.9 1.8
Short term deposits and loans (0.1) 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.1
Trade receivables (24.6) (12.3) 246.4 12.3 24.6
Receivables and debit balances (0.1) 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.1
Long-term deposits and loans (0.1) (0.1) 1.1 0.1 0.1
Credit from banks and others 15.8 7.9 (157.6) (7.9) (15.8)
Trade payables 18.2 9.1 (182.1) (9.1) (18.2)
Other payables 7.7 3.8 (76.9) (3.8) (7.7)
Long-term loans from banks 2.9 1.4 (29.0) (1.4) (2.9)
Options 5.7 2.8 (1.8) (3.1) (6.7)
Forward 35.0 16.6 (2.6) (15.0) (28.7)
Swap 5.3 2.7 (0.6) (2.5) (5.1)
Total 63.9 31.0 (183.6) (29.5) (58.4)


252

Increase (decrease)
in fair value
Fair value
Increase (decrease)
in fair value
GBP/USD$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions
Type of instrumentIncrease of 10%
Increase of
5%
Decrease of 5%Decrease of 10%
Cash and cash equivalents (0.7) (0.3) 6.7 0.3 0.7
Trade receivables (4.8) (2.4) 47.8 2.4 4.8
Receivables and debit balances 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0
Credit from banks and others 2.0 1.0 (20.3) (1.0) (2.0)
Trade payables 2.3 1.2 (23.0) (1.2) (2.3)
Other payables 1.5 0.7 (14.7) (0.7) (1.5)
Options-----
Forward 2.6 1.2 0.1 (1.1) (2.2)
Total 2.9 1.4 (3.3) (1.3) (2.5)

Increase (decrease)
in fair value
Fair value
Increase (decrease)
in fair value
GBP/EUR$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions
Type of instrumentIncrease of 10%
Increase of
5%
Decrease of 5%Decrease of 10%
Forward 2.2 1.2 0.1 (1.3) (2.7)

Increase (decrease)
in fair value
Fair value
Increase (decrease)
in fair value
BRL/USD$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions
Type of instrumentIncrease of   10%
Increase of
5%
Decrease of 5%Decrease of 10%
Cash and cash equivalents (0.7) (0.3) 6.5 0.3 0.7
Trade receivables (3.1) (1.5) 30.8 1.5 3.1
Trade payables 1.5 0.8 (15.5) (0.8) (1.5)
Other payables 0.2 0.1 (1.9) (0.1) (0.2)
Long-term loans from banks 3.0 1.5 (30.0) (1.5) (3.0)
Total 0.9 0.6 (10.1) (0.6) (0.9)

Increase (decrease)
in fair value
Fair value
Increase (decrease)
in fair value
CNY/USD$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions
Type of instrumentIncrease of   10%
Increase of
5%
Decrease of   5%Decrease of 10%
Cash and cash equivalents (2.2) (1.1) 21.6 1.1 2.2
Trade receivables (9.2) (4.6) 91.7 4.6 9.2
Trade payables 8.5 4.3 (85.3) (4.3) (8.5)
Other payables 2.1 1.0 (20.8) (1.0) (2.1)
Credit from banks and others 17.3 8.7 (173.3) (8.7) (17.3)
Forward 3.1 1.6 (0.7) (1.8) (3.8)
Long-term loans (CNY) 9.8 4.9 (98.1) (4.9) (9.8)
Total 29.4 14.8 (264.9) (15.0) (30.1)


253

Interest Rate Risk

We have loans bearing variable interest that expose our finance expenses and cash flows to changes in those interest rates. With respect to our fixed-fixed‑ interest loans, there is exposure to changes in the fair value of the loans due to changes in the market interest rate.

Our Finance Forum examines the extent of the

We use some hedging transactions in order to adjust the structurehedge some of the actual interest to our expectations with regard to the anticipated developments in interest rates, taking into account the cost of the hedging.above exposure. The hedging is implemented by using a fixed interest range and by hedging variable interest.

The table below sets forth the sensitivity of certain financial instruments to 0.5% and 1% increases and decreases in the LIBOR rate as at December 31, 2016.

 Increase (decrease)
in fair value
Fair valueIncrease (decrease)
in fair value
 $ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions
Type of instrumentIncrease of
1%
Increase of 0.5% Decrease of 0.5%Decrease of 1%
Fixed-USD interest debentures62.932.1(1,077.8)(33.4)(68.1)
Swap transactions13.46.8(5.5)(7.0)(14.3)
NIS/USD swap31.816.23.3(16.7)(33.9)
Total108.155.1(1,080.0)(57.1)(116.3)

2018.

Increase (decrease)
in fair value
Fair value
Increase (decrease)
in fair value
$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions
Type of instrument
Increase of
1%
Increase of 0.5%Decrease of 0.5%Decrease of 1%
Fixed-USD interest debentures 77.5 40.0 (1,068.9) (42.7) (88.4)
Swap transactions 7.7 3.9 0.4 (4.0) (8.2)
NIS/USD swap 17.6 8.9 14.7 (9.1) (18.4)
EUR/USD swap (0.2) (0.1) (1.0) 0.1 0.2
Total102.8 52.8 (1,054.8) (55.8) (115.0)

The table below sets forth the sensitivity of certain financial instruments to 0.5% and 1% increases and decreases in the LIBOR rate as at December 31, 2015.

 Increase (decrease)
in fair value
Fair valueIncrease (decrease)
in fair value
 $ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions
Type of instrumentIncrease of
1%
Increase of 0.5% Decrease of 0.5%Decrease of 1%
Fixed-USD interest debentures70.435.9(1,087.9)(37.5)(76.7)
Collar transactions0.10.1(0.2)(0.1)(0.2)
Swap transactions16.98.6(9.6)(8.9)(18.1)
NIS/USD swap10.65.4(4.0)(5.6)(11.5)
Total98.050.0(1,101.7)(52.1)(106.5)

2017.

Increase (decrease)
in fair value
Fair value
Increase (decrease)
 in fair value
$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions
Type of instrument
Increase of
1%
Increase of 0.5%Decrease of 0.5%Decrease of 1%
Fixed-USD interest debentures58.229.6(1,107.9)(30.7)(62.4)
Swap transactions10.15.1(2.7)(5.3)(10.8)
NIS/USD swap33.122.464.0(11.7)(23.6)
Total101.457.1(1,046.6)(47.7)(96.8)

The table below sets forth the sensitivity of certain financial instruments to 0.5% and 1% increases and decreases in the NIS interest rate as at December 31, 2016.

Sensitivity to changes in the shekel interest rateIncrease (decrease)
in fair value
Fair valueIncrease (decrease)
in fair value
 $ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions
Type of instrumentIncrease of
1%
Increase of 0.5% Decrease of 0.5%Decrease of 1%
Fixed-interest long-term loan7.53.8(156.9)(4.0)(8.1)
Fixed rate debentures (series E)20.310.3(405.5)(10.7)(21.7)
NIS/USD swap(32.8)(16.7)3.317.335.1
Total(5.0)(2.6)(559.1)2.65.3

258 

2018.
 

Sensitivity to changes in the shekel interest rate
Increase (decrease)
in fair value
Fair value
Increase (decrease)
in fair value
$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions
Type of instrument
Increase of
1%
Increase of 0.5%Decrease of 0.5%Decrease of 1%
Fixed-interest long-term loan 2.7 1.4 (73.0) (1.4) (2.9)
Fixed rate debentures (series E) 14.5 7.4 (426.8) (7.5) (15.3)
NIS/USD swap (18.5) (9.4) 14.7 9.6 19.5
Total (1.3) (0.6) (485.1) 0.7 1.3


254

The table below sets forth the sensitivity of certain financial instruments to 0.5% and 1% increases and decreases in the NIS interest rate as at December 31, 2015.

Sensitivity to changes in the shekel interest rateIncrease (decrease)
in fair value
Fair valueIncrease (decrease)
in fair value
 $ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions
Type of instrumentIncrease of
1%
Increase of 0.5% Decrease of 0.5%Decrease of 1%
Fixed-interest long-term loan8.94.5(165.8)(4.7)(9.6)
NIS/USD swap(10.4)(5.3)(4.0)5.511.3
Total(1.5)(0.8)(169.8)0.81.7

2017.

Sensitivity to changes in the shekel interest rate
Increase (decrease)
in fair value
Fair value
Increase (decrease)
in fair value
$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions
Type of instrument
Increase of
1%
Increase of 0.5%Decrease of 0.5%Decrease of 1%
Fixed-interest long-term loan 3.7 1.9 (86.0) (2.0) (4.0)
Fixed rate debentures (series E) 20.1 10.2 (470.9) (10.5) (21.3)
NIS/USD swap (25.9) (13.1) 64.0 13.5 27.5
Total (2.1) (1.0) (492.9) 1.0 2.2

Energy Price Risk

Execution

We use Energy as part of operating our mines, facilities and logistics channels. We are executing some hedging is determined by appropriate personnel after consultation with Israeli and foreign energy advisors.

transactions to hedge some of this exposure.

The table below sets forth the sensitivity of instruments hedging energy price risks to 5% and 10% increases and decreases in energy prices as of December 31, 2016.

 Increase (decrease)
in fair value
Fair valueIncrease (decrease)
in fair value
 $ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions
Type of instrumentIncrease of
10%
Increase of 0.5% Decrease of 0.5%Decrease of 10%
Energy hedges2.21.13.6(1.1)(2.1)

2018.

Increase (decrease)
in fair value
Fair value
Increase (decrease)
in fair value
$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions
Type of instrument
Increase of
10%
Increase of 5%Decrease of 5%Decrease of 10%
Energy hedges 1.5 0.8 (3.0) (0.9) (2.0)

The table below sets forth the sensitivity of instruments hedging energy price risks to 5% and 10% increases and decreases in energy prices as of December 31, 2015.

 Increase (decrease)
in fair value
Fair valueIncrease (decrease)
in fair value
 $ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions
Type of instrumentIncrease of
10%
Increase of 0.5% Decrease of 0.5%Decrease of 10%
Energy hedges1.10.5(6.6)(0.5)(1.1)

259 

2017.
 

Increase (decrease)
in fair value
Fair value
Increase (decrease)
in fair value
$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions
Type of instrument
Increase of
10%
Increase of 5%Decrease of 5%Decrease of 10%
Energy hedges 2.1 1.0 2.2 (1.0) (1.9)


255

Marine Shipping Price Risk

We purchase hedges on partare shipping substantial amounts of goods worldwide using marine shipments. We execute some hedging transactions to reduce some of our exposure to marine bulk shipping prices. Hedging is executed by the appropriate personnel, after consultation with overseas experts.

The table below sets forth the sensitivity of instruments hedging marine shipping price risk to 5% and 10% increases and decreases in marine shipping prices as of December 31, 2016.

 Increase (decrease)
in fair value
Fair valueIncrease (decrease)
in fair value
 $ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions
Type of instrumentIncrease of
10%
Increase of 0.5% Decrease of 0.5%Decrease of 10%
Marine shipping hedges1.80.90.4(0.9)(1.8)

2018.

Increase (decrease)
in fair value
Fair value
Increase (decrease)
in fair value
$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions
Type of instrument
Increase of
10%
Increase of 5%Decrease of 5%Decrease of 10%
Marine shipping hedges 2.7 1.3 (2.2) (1.3) (2.7)

The table below sets forth the sensitivity of instruments hedging marine shipping price risk to 5% and 10% increases and decreases in marine shipping prices as of December 31, 2015.

 Increase (decrease)
in fair value
Fair valueIncrease (decrease)
in fair value
 $ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions
Type of instrumentIncrease of
10%
Increase of 0.5% Decrease of 0.5%Decrease of 10%
Marine shipping hedges0.40.2(4.6)(0.2)(0.4)
2017.
Increase (decrease)
in fair value
Fair value
Increase (decrease)
in fair value
$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions
Type of instrument
Increase of
10%
Increase of 5%Decrease of 5%Decrease of 10%
Marine shipping hedges 2.2 1.1 1.9 (1.0) (2.1)

Item 12 – DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES OTHER THAN EQUITY SECURITIES

Not Applicable.

Item 13 – DEFAULTS, DIVIDEND ARRANGEMENTS AND DELINQUENCIES

None.

Not Applicable.

Item 14 – MATERIAL MODIFICATIONS TO THE RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS AND USE OF PROCEEDS

Not Applicable.


256

Item 15 – CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES


A. DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES


ICL’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, after evaluating the effectiveness of ICL’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f)13a-15(e)) as of the end of the period covered by this annual report, have concluded that, as of such date, ICL’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that the information required in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and such information is accumulated and communicated to its management, including its chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

B. MANAGEMENT’S ANNUAL REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROLS OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING


ICL’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. ICL’s internal control over financial reporting system was designed by, or under the supervision of, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, and effected by our board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of its consolidated financial statements, for external purposes, in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. These include those policies and procedures that:

·pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect transactions and dispositions of our assets;

·provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements, in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorization of our management and directors; and

·provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on our financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Therefore, effective control over financial reporting cannot, and does not, provide absolute assurance of achieving our control objectives. Also, projections of, and any evaluation of effectiveness of the internal controls in future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

257


Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, assessed the effectiveness of ICL’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016.2018. In making this assessment, our management used the criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission of 2013 (COSO). Based on such assessment, our management has concluded that, as of December 31, 2016,2018, ICL’s internal control over financial reporting is effective based on those criteria.


C. Attestation Report of the Registered Public Accounting Firm


Somekh Chaikin, member firm of KPMG International, an independent registered public accounting firm, has audited and reported on the effectiveness of ICL’s internal controls over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016.2018. See Somekh Chaikin’s attestation report beginning on page F-2 of this annual report.

D. Changes in internal control over financial reporting


There has been no identified change in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation required by Rules 13a-15 or 15d-15 that occurred during the period covered by this annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Item 16A – AUDIT AND ACCOUNTING COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT

Our Board of Directors has determined, based on qualification statements delivered to the Company, that Board members Ms. Ruth Ralbag and Messrs. Yaacov DiorNadav Kaplan and Geoffrey MerszeiLior Reitblatt shall serve as financial experts of the Audit and Accounting Committee, as that term is defined in Item 16A(b) of Form 20-F, and that all members of the Audit and Accounting Committee, Mr. Yaacov Dior, Mr. Geoffrey MerszeiMs. Ruth Ralbag and Dr. Miriam HaranMessrs. Nadav Kaplan and Lior Reitblatt are financially literate and are independent directors for the purposes Rule of 10A-3 of the Exchange Act and of the NYSE trade listing requirements.

Item 16B – CODE OF ETHICS

Our Board of Directors have adopted a Code of Conduct that applies to our to Board of Directors, senior management and employees, including our principalchief executive officer, principalchief financial officer, principalchief accounting officer or controller and any other persons who perform similar functions for us. Our Code of Ethics is available, on our website, www.icl-group.com.

www.icl-group.com.

258

Item 16C – PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

Somekh Chaikin, a member of KPMG International, has served as our independent registered public accounting firm for 20162018 and 2015. These accountants2017. Following are the billed the following fees, to us for their professional services in each of those fiscal years:

 20162015
 US$ thousandsUS$ thousands
Audit fees(1) 5,3106,070
Audit-related fees(2) 360400
Tax fees(3) 1,2501,600
All other fees(4)-20
Total6,9208,090
   

262 

 

 20182017
 US$ thousandsUS$ thousands
Audit fees(1) 4,897 5,132
Audit-related fees(2) 192 395
Tax fees(3) 1,751 1,473
Total 6,840 7,000

(1) Audit fees are the aggregate fees billed or expected to be billed for the audit of our annual financial statements. This category also includes services that are generally provided by the independent accountant, provides, such as consents and assistance with and review of documents filed with the SEC.

(2) Audit-related Fees are the aggregate fees billed for assurance and related services rendered during the year ended December 31, 2018 that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit and are not reported under Audit fees. These fees include mainly audits of financial statements of a carve-out entity in anticipation of a divestiture and accounting consultations regarding the accounting treatment of matters that occur in the regular course of business, implications of new accounting pronouncements and other accounting issues that occur from time to time.

consultation on proposed transactions.

(3) Tax fees are the aggregate fees billed for professional services rendered during the year ended December 31 rendered for tax compliance, tax advice, and tax planning, assistance with tax audits and appeals.

(4) All other fees consisted of fees billed or accrued for products and services provided by the principal accountant, other than the services reported above under other captions in the above table.

Audit Committee’s pre-approval policies and procedures


All services provided by our independent auditors are approved in advance by either the Audit and Accounting Committee or members thereof, to whom authority has been delegated, in accordance with the Audit and Accounting Committee's pre-approval procedure respecting such services.

Item 16D – EXEMPTIONS FROM THE LISTING STANDARDS FOR AUDIT COMMITTEES

None.

Not Applicable.
259

Item 16E – PURCHASE OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY THE ISSUER AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS

None.

Not Applicable.
Item 16F – CHANGE IN REGISTRANT’S CERTIFYING ACCOUNTANT

None.


Not Applicable.
Item 16G – CORPORATE GOVERNANCE


Corporate Governance Practices

We are incorporated in Israel and therefore subject to various corporate governance requirementsprovisions under the Companies Law and the regulations promulgated thereunder, relating to such matters as external directors, the audit committee, the compensation committee and the internal auditor. These are in addition to the requirements of the NYSE and relevant provisions of U.S. securities laws that apply to foreign companies listed for trade in the U.S.

As a foreign private issuer whose shares are listed on the NYSE, we have the option to follow certain corporate governance practices applying in the country of incorporation of the foreign company, Israel, rather than those of the NYSE, except to the extent that such laws would be contrary to U.S. securities laws and provided that we disclose the practices that we are not following and describe the home country practices which we elected to follow instead. We intend to rely on this “foreign private issuer exemption” with respect to the following NYSE requirements:

·
Majority Independent Board.  Under Section 303A.01 of the NYSE Listed Company Manual (the “LCM”), a U.S. domestic listed company, other than a controlled company, must have a majority of independent directors. Fivesix of our nineten directors are not considered independent directors under Israeli law whether due to their relationship with the Company, our controlling shareholder or the length of their tenure on our Board of Directors.
·
Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee.  Under Section 303A.04 of the LCM, a U.S. domestic listed company, other than a controlled company, must have a nominating/corporate governance committee composed entirely of independent directors. Our controlling shareholder, Israel Corporation, has significant control over the appointment of our directors.
·
Equity Compensation Plans. Under Section 303A.08 of the LCM, shareholders must be given the opportunity to vote on all equity-compensationequity‑compensation plans and material revisions thereto, with certain limited exemptions as described therein. We follow the requirements of the Israeli Companies Law, under which approval of equity compensation plans and material revisions thereto is within the authority of our HR & Compensation and Human Resources Committee and the Board of Directors. However, under the Israeli Companies Law, any compensation to directors, the chief executive officer or a controlling shareholder or another person in which a controlling shareholder has a personal interest, including equity compensation plans, generally requires the approval of the compensation committee, the board of directors and the shareholders, in that order. The compensation of directors and officers is generally required to comply with a shareholder-approvedshareholder‑approved compensation policy, which is required, among other things, to include a monetary cap on the value of equity compensation that may be granted to any director or officer.
260

·
Shareholder Approval of Securities Issuances.Issuances. Under Section 312.03 of the LCM, shareholder approval is a prerequisite to (a) issuing common stock, or securities convertible into or exercisable for ordinary shares, to a related party, a subsidiary, affiliate or other closely related person of a related party or any company or entity in which a related party has a substantial interest, if the number of ordinary shares to be issued exceeds either 1% of the number of ordinary shares or 1% of the voting power outstanding before the issuance, and (b) issuing ordinary shares, or securities convertible into or exercisable for ordinary shares, if the ordinary share has, or will haveupon issuance, voting power equal to or in excess of 20% of the voting power outstanding before the issuance or the number of ordinary shares to be issued is equal to or in excess of 20% of the number of ordinary shares before the issuance, in each case subject to certain exceptions. We seek shareholder approval for all corporate actions requiring such approval under the requirements of the Israeli Companies Law, which are different from the requirements for seeking shareholder approval under Section 312.03 of the LCM. Under the Israeli Companies Law, shareholder approval is a prerequisite to any extraordinary transaction with a controlling shareholder or in which a controlling shareholder has a personal interest. Under the Israeli Companies Law, shareholder approval is also a prerequisite to a private placement of securities if it will cause a person to become a controlling shareholder or in case all of the following conditions are met:


·The securities issued amount to 20% or more of the company’s outstanding voting rights before the issuance;

·Some or all of the consideration is other than cash or listed securities or the transaction is not on market terms; and

·The transaction will increase the relative holdings of a 5% shareholder or will cause any person to become, as a result of the issuance, a 5% shareholder.

Except as stated above, we intend to comply with virtually all the rules applicable to U.S. companies listed on the NYSE. We may decide in the future to use additional and/or other foreign private issuer exemptions with respect to some or all of the other NYSE listing requirements. Following governance practices of our home country, Israel, as opposed to the requirements that would otherwise apply to a company listed on the NYSE, may provide less protection than is accorded to investors under NYSE listing requirements applicable to domestic issuers. For more information, see “Item 3.Item 3 - Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Ordinary Shares—As a foreign private issuer, we are permitted to follow certain home country corporate governance practices instead of applicable SEC and NYSE requirements, which may result in less protection than is accordedafforded to investors under rules applicable to domestic issuers.”

issuers”.

261

Item 16H – MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURE

Not applicable.

Item 17 – FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

See "Item 18.“Item 18 - Financial Statements."

Statements”.

Item 18 – FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

See page F-1.

Item 19 – EXHIBITS

We have filed certain exhibits to our Form 20-F filed with the SEC, which are available for perusal at: www.sec.gov.

www.sec.gov.

ITEM 19 – EXHIBITS

4.2**Plan for the Private Allocation of Options for Shares of the Company to the CEO of the Company, to Office Holders and Employees of the Company and its Subsidiaries dated November 27, 2012 (unofficial translation from original Hebrew).
4.3**Equity Compensation Plan (2014), dated August 20, 2014 (unofficial translation from original Hebrew).
4.4
4.5*4.3*
4.6*
4.7*
4.8*
8.1
4.8Amendment No. 1, dated October 29, 2018 to the Revolving Credit Facility Agreement, dated March 23, 2015, by and among certain financial institutions, ICL Finance B.V., and Israel Chemicals Ltd.

*
Incorporated by reference to our registration statement on Form F-1 (file no. 333- 198711), as amended.
**
Incorporated by reference to our registration statementannual report on Form S-820-F (file no. 333-205518),001-13742) for the year ended December 31, 2016, dated July 6, 2015.March 16, 2017.
***
Incorporated by reference to our annual report on Form 20-F (file no. 001-13742) for the year ended December 31, 2015, dated March 16, 2016.

ICL has no instrument with respect to long-term debt not listed above under which the total amount of securities authorized exceeds 10% of the total assets of ICL on a consolidated basis.  The Company agrees to furnish to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request a copy of each instrument with respect to long-term debt not filed as an exhibit to this report.


****
Incorporated by reference to our annual report on Form 20-F (file no. 001-13742) for the year ended December 31, 2017, dated March 7, 2018.
262

SIGNATURES

The registrant hereby certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 20-F and that it has duly caused and authorized the undersigned to sign this annual report on its behalf.

 
ISRAEL CHEMICALS LTD.
 
 By:/s/ Kobi Altman
  Name:Kobi Altman
  Title:Chief Financial Officer

 
 By:/s/ Lisa HaimovitzAya Landman
  Name:Lisa HaimovitzAya Landman
  Title:Senior Vice President, Global General Counsel and CorporateCompany Secretary

Date: March 15, 2017

February 27, 2019
263



 

 Consolidated
   Financial
Statements

         As at
                                        December 31, 2016


Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2016

2018

Contents



Somekh Chaikin                              
KPMG Millennium Tower
17 Ha'arba'a Street, PO Box  609
Tel Aviv 61006 Israel
Telephone    972 3  684  8000
Fax                972 3  684  8444
Internet        www.kpmg.co.il
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


The Board of Directors and Shareholders

Israel Chemicals Ltd

Opinions on the Consolidated Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial Reporting

We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of financial position of Israel Chemicals Ltd. (hereinafter – “the Company”) and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 20162018 and 2015,2017, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three yearthree-year period ended December 31, 2016.2018, and the related notes (collectively, the "consolidated financial statements"). We also have audited the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20162018, based on criteria established inInternal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2018, in conformity with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
Basis for Opinions

The Company’s management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on thesethe Company’s consolidated financial statements and an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audits.

We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.


We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud, and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.

Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence supportingregarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements, assessingstatements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, andas well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statement presentation.statements. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

opinions.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles,International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.


Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion,

KPMG Somekh Chaikin
We have served as the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects,Company’s auditor since 2006.
Tel Aviv, Israel
February 26, 2019
Somekh Chaikin, a partnership registered under the financial position ofIsraeli partnership
Ordinance, is the Company and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2016, in conformity with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).

/s/ Somekh Chaikin

Somekh Chaikin

Certified Public Accountants (Isr.)

Member FirmIsraeli member firm of KPMG International,

Tel Aviv, Israel

March 14, 2017

a Swiss cooperative.



Consolidated Statements of Financial Position as at December 31

  20162015
 Note$ millions$ millions
Current assets   
Cash and cash equivalents 87161
Short-term investments and deposits62987
Trade receivables 9661,082
Inventories71,2671,364
Other receivables23,14,8

222

291

Total current assets 

2,571

2,985

    
Non-current assets   
Investments in equity-accounted investees9153159
Financial assets available for sale 253-
Deferred tax assets17150199
Property, plant and equipment114,3094,212
Intangible assets128241,185
Other non-current assets10,18,23,14

292

337

Total non-current assets 

5,981

6,092

    
Total assets 

8,552

9,077

    
Current liabilities   
Short-term credit15588673
Trade payables 644716
Provisions198342
Other current liabilities23,14,16

708

615

Total current liabilities 

2,023

2,046

    
Non-current liabilities   
Long-term debt and debentures152,7962,805
Deferred tax liabilities17303351
Long-term employee provisions18576547
Provisions19185127
Other non-current liabilities23,14

10

13

Total non-current liabilities 

3,870

3,843

    
Total liabilities 

5,893

5,889

    
Equity   
Total shareholders’ equity21

2,574

3,028

Non-controlling interests 

85

160

Total equity 

2,659

3,188

    
Total liabilities and equity 

8,552

9,077

    


  20182017
 Note$ millions$ millions
Current assets   
Cash and cash equivalents  121 83
Short-term investments and deposits  92 90
Trade receivables  990 932
Inventories 6 1,290 1,226
Assets held for sale - 169
Other receivables7,14 295 225
Total current assets  2,788 2,725
    
Non-current assets   
Investments in equity-accounted investees  30 29
Investments at fair value through other comprehensive income  145 212
Deferred tax assets 17 122 132
Property, plant and equipment 11 4,663 4,521
Intangible assets 12 671 722
Other non-current assets9,14,18 357 373
Total non-current assets  5,988 5,989
    
Total assets  8,776 8,714
    
Current liabilities   
Short-term credit 15 610 822
Trade payables  715 790
Provisions 19 37 78
Liabilities held for sale - 43
Other current liabilities14,16 647 595
Total current liabilities  2,009 2,328
    
Non-current liabilities   
Long-term debt and debentures 15 1,815 2,388
Deferred tax liabilities 17 297 228
Long-term employee liabilities 18 501 640
Provisions 19 229 193
Other non-current liabilities  10 7
Total non-current liabilities  2,852 3,456
    
Total liabilities  4,861 5,784
    
Equity 21  
Total shareholders’ equity  3,781 2,859
Non-controlling interests  134 71
Total equity  3,915 2,930
    
Total liabilities and equity  8,776 8,714


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


F - 1

Consolidated Statements of Income for the Year Ended December 31

  201620152014
 Note$ millions$ millions$ millions
Sales225,3635,4056,111
Cost of sales22

3,703

3,602

3,915

     
Gross profit 1,6601,8032,196
     
Selling, transport and  marketing expenses22722653839
General and administrative expenses22321350306
Research and development expenses22737487
Other expenses22618211259
Other income22

(71)

(250)

(53)

     
Operating income (loss) 

(3)

765

758

     
Finance expenses 157160279
Finance income 

(25)

(52)

(122)

     
Finance expenses, net22

132

108

157

     
     
Share in earnings of equity-accounted investees9

18

11

31

     
Income (loss) before income taxes (117)668632
     
Income taxes17

55

162

166

     
Net income (loss) 

(172)

506

466

     
     
Net income (loss) attributable to the non-controlling interests 

(50)

(3)

2

     
Net income (loss) attributable to the shareholders of the Company 

(122)

509

464

     
     
Earnings (loss) per share attributable to    
  the shareholders of the Company:    
     
Basic earnings (loss) per share (in cents)24

(10.00)

40.05

36.50

     
Diluted earnings (loss) per share (in cents)24

(10.00)

40.03

36.50

     
Weighted-average number of    
  ordinary shares outstanding:    
     
Basic (in thousands) 

1,273,295

1,271,624

1,270,426

     
Diluted (in thousands) 

1,273,295

1,272,256

1,270,458

     


  201820172016
 Note$ millions$ millions$ millions

Sales22 5,556 5,418 5,363
Cost of sales22 3,702 3,746 3,703
     
Gross profit  1,854 1,672 1,660
     
Selling, transport and marketing expenses22 798 746 722
General and administrative expenses22 257 261 321
Research and development expenses22 55 55 73
Other expenses22 84 90 618
Other income22 (859) (109) (71)
     
Operating income (loss)  1,519 629 (3)
     
Finance expenses  214 229 157
Finance income  (56) (105) (25)
     
Finance expenses, net22 158 124 132
     
Share in earnings of equity-accounted investees  3- 18
     
Income (loss) before income taxes  1,364 505 (117)
     
Provision for income taxes17 129 158 55
     
Net income (loss)  1,235 347 (172)
     
Net loss attributable to the non-controlling interests  (5) (17) (50)
     
Net income (loss) attributable to the shareholders of the Company  1,240 364 (122)
     
Earnings (losses) per share attributable to the shareholders of the Company:24   
     
Basic earnings (losses) per share (in dollars)  0.97 0.29 (0.10)
     
Diluted earnings (losses) per share (in dollars)  0.97 0.29 (0.10)
     
Weighted-average number of ordinary shares outstanding:24   
     
Basic (in thousands)  1,277,209 1,276,072 1,273,295
     
Diluted (in thousands)  1,279,781 1,276,997 1,273,295

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


F - 2

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for
the Year Ended December 31

 201620152014
 $ millions$ millions$ millions
Net income (loss)

(172)

506

466

    
Components of other comprehensive income that  will be reclassified subsequently to net income (loss)   
Currency translation differences(90)(205)(221)
Changes in fair value of derivatives designated as a cash flow hedge(1)(2)(11)
Changes in fair value of financial assets available for sale17--
Income tax relating to items that will be reclassified subsequently to net income (loss)

(5)

-

-

Total

(79)

(207)

(232)

    
Components of other comprehensive income that will not be reclassified to net income (loss)   
Actuarial gains (losses) from defined benefit plan(48)63(103)
Income (loss)  tax relating to items that will not be reclassified to net income (loss)

8

(15)

24

Total

(40)

48

(79)

    
Total comprehensive income (loss)

(291)

347

155

    
    
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to the non-controlling interests

(59)

(9)

2

    
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to the shareholders of the Company

(232)

356

153

    


 201820172016
 $ millions$ millions$ millions

Net income (loss) 1,235 347 (172)
    
Components of other comprehensive income that will be reclassified subsequently to net income (loss)   
Currency translation differences (95) 152 (90)
Changes in fair value of derivatives designated as a cash flow hedge-- (1)
Net changes of investments at fair value through other comprehensive income- (57) 17
Tax income (expenses) relating to items that will be reclassified subsequently to net income (loss)- 5 (5)
  (95) 100 (79)
    
Components of other comprehensive income that will not be reclassified to net income (loss)   
Net changes of investments at fair value through other comprehensive income (58)--
Actuarial gains (losses) from defined benefit plans 56 (17) (48)
Tax income (expense) relating to items that will not be reclassified to net income (loss) (3) 3 8
  (5) (14) (40)
    
Total comprehensive income (loss) 1,135 433 (291)
    
Comprehensive loss attributable to the non-controlling interests (9) (13) (59)
    
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to the shareholders of the Company 1,144 446 (232)


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


F - 3

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity

 Attributable to the shareholders of the CompanyNon- 
 controllingTotal
 interestsequity
          
   Cumulative Treasury Total  
 ShareSharetranslationCapitalshares,Retainedshareholders'  
 capitalpremiumadjustmentreservesat costearningsequity  
 $ millions
For the year ended December 31, 2016         
Balance as at January 1, 2016 544 149 (400) 93 (260) 2,902 3,028 160 3,188
          
Share-based compensation-* 25- (10)-- 15- 15
Dividends----- (222) (222) (4) (226)
Changes in equity of equity-accounted investees--- (15)-- (15)- (15)
Non-controlling interests in business combinations from prior periods------- (12) (12)
Comprehensive loss

(81)

11

-

(162)

(232)

(59)

(291)

          
Balance as at December 31, 2016

544

174

(481)

79

(260)

2,518

2,574

85

2,659

          

* Less than $1 million.

Attributable to the shareholders of the CompanyNon- controlling interestsTotal equity
Share capitalShare premiumCumulative translation adjustmentCapital reservesTreasury shares, at costRetained earningsTotal shareholders’ equity
$ millions

For the year ended December 31, 2018         
Balance as at January 1, 2018 545 186 (333) 30 (260) 2,691 2,859 71 2,930
          
Share-based compensation 1 7- 11-- 19- 19
Dividends----- (241) (241) (1) (242)
Capitalization of subsidiary debt------- 73 73
Comprehensive income (loss)-- (91) (58)- 1,293 1,144 (9) 1,135
Balance as at December 31, 2018 546 193 (424) (17) (260) 3,743 3,781 134 3,915


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


F - 4

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity (cont'd)

 Attributable to the equity holders of the CompanyNon- 
 controllingTotal
 interestsequity
          
   Cumulative Treasury Total  
 ShareSharetranslationCapitalshares,Retainedshareholders'  
 capitalpremiumadjustmentreservesat costearningsequity  
 $ millions
For the year ended December 31, 2015         
          
Balance as at January 1, 2015 543 134 (201) 66 (260) 2,692 2,974 26 3,000
          
Issue of shares 1 15---- 16- 16
Share-based compensation-*-- 15-- 15- 15
Dividends----- (347) (347) (1) (348)
Business combinations--- 14-- 14 144 158
Comprehensive income (loss)

-

-

(199)

(2)

-

557

356

(9)

347

          
Balance as at December 31, 2015

544

149

(400)

93

(260)

2,902

3,028

160

3,188

          

* Less than $1 million.


Attributable to the shareholders of the CompanyNon- controlling interestsTotal equity
Share capitalShare premiumCumulative translation adjustmentCapital reservesTreasury shares, at costRetained earningsTotal shareholders’ equity
$ millions

For the year ended December 31, 2017         
Balance as at January 1, 2017 544 174 (481) 79 (260) 2,518 2,574 85 2,659
          
Share-based compensation 1 12- 3-- 16- 16
Dividends----- (177) (177) (1) (178)
Comprehensive income (loss)-- 148 (52)- 350 446 (13) 433
          
Balance as at December 31, 2017 545 186 (333) 30 (260) 2,691 2,859 71 2,930


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F - 5


Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity (cont'd)

 Attributable to the equity holders of the CompanyNon- 
 controllingTotal
 interestsequity
          
   Cumulative Treasury Total  
 ShareSharetranslationCapitalshares,Retainedshareholders'  
 capitalpremiumadjustmentreservesat costearningsequity  
 $ millions
For the year ended December 31, 2014         
          
Balance as at January 1, 2014 543 134 19 65 (260) 3,153 3,654 25 3,679
          
Share-based compensation-*-- 12-- 12- 12
Dividends----- (845) (845) (1) (846)
Comprehensive income

-

-

(220)

(11)

-

384

153

2

155

          
Balance as at December 31, 2014

543

134

(201)

66

(260)

2,692

2,974

26

3,000

          



Attributable to the shareholders of the CompanyNon- controlling interestsTotal equity
Share capitalShare premiumCumulative translation adjustmentCapital reservesTreasury shares, at costRetained earningsTotal shareholders’ equity
$ millions

For the year ended December 31, 2016         
Balance as at January 1, 2016 544 149 (400) 93 (260) 2,902 3,028 160 3,188
          
Share-based compensation*- 25- (10)-- 15- 15
Dividends----- (222) (222) (4) (226)
Changes in equity of equity-accounted investees--- (15)-- (15)- (15)
Non-controlling interests in business combinations from prior periods------- (12) (12)
Comprehensive loss-- (81) 11- (162) (232) (59) (291)
          
Balance as at December 31, 2016 544 174 (481) 79 (260) 2,518 2,574 85 2,659

* Less than $1 million.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


F - 6

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Year Ended
December 31

 201620152014
$ millions$ millions$ millions
Cash flows from operating activities   
Net income (loss)(172)506466
Adjustments for:   
Depreciation and amortization406430427
Revaluation of balances from financial institutions and interest expenses, net764438
Share in earnings of equity-accounted investees, net(18)(11)(31)
Other capital losses, net4325(42)
Share-based compensation151512
Loss (gain) from divestiture of subsidiaries1(215)-
Deferred tax expenses (income)(2)537
 738779907
Change in inventories7025(33)
Change in trade and other receivables150(86)(25)
Change in trade and other payables(90)(55)(22)
Change in provisions and employee benefits98(90)66
Net change in operating assets and liabilities228(206)(14)
Net cash provided by operating activities966573893
Cash flows from investing activities   
Investments in shares and proceeds from deposits, net(198)34(21)
Purchases of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets(632)(619)(835)
Business combinations, net of cash acquired-(351)(143)
Proceeds from divestiture of subsidiaries17364-
Other13253
Net cash used in investing activities(800)(547)(996)
Cash flows from financing activities   
Dividend paid to the company's shareholders(162)(347)(845)
Receipt of long-term debt1,2781,2012,055
Repayment of long-term debt(1,365)(846)(999)
Short-term credit from banks and others, net148(140)
Other(4)(1)(1)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing  activities(239)1570
Net change in cash and cash equivalents(73)41(33)
Cash and cash equivalents as at beginning of the period161138188
Net effect of currency translation on cash and cash equivalents(1)(18)(16)
Cash and cash equivalents included as part of assets held for sale--(8)
Cash and cash equivalents as at the end of the period87161131
    

Additional Information

 

For the year

ended 31, December

 201620152014
 $ millions$ millions$ millions
Income taxes paid, net of tax refunds 84 20 159
Interest paid 112 87 49

 201820172016
 $ millions$ millions$ millions

Cash flows from operating activities   
Net income (loss) 1,235 347 (172)
Adjustments for:   
Depreciation and amortization 403 390 401
Impairment of non-current assets 17 28 5
Exchange rate and interest expenses, net 35 137 76
Share in earnings of equity-accounted investees, net (3)- (18)
Loss (gain) from divestiture of businesses (841) (54) 1
Capital losses-- 432
Share-based compensation 19 16 15
Deferred tax expenses (income) 76 (46) (2)
  (294) 471 910
    
Change in inventories (115) 57 70
Change in trade and other receivables (104) 21 150
Change in trade and other payables (36) (45) (90)
Change in provisions and employee benefits (66) (4) 98
Net change in operating assets and liabilities (321) 29 228
    
Net cash provided by operating activities 620 847 966
    
Cash flows from investing activities   
Proceeds from deposits, net (3) (65) (198)
Purchases of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets (572) (457) (632)
Proceeds from divestiture of businesses net of transaction expenses
* 902
 6 17
Proceeds from sale of equity-accounted investee- 168-
Dividends from equity-accounted investees 2 3 12
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment 2 12 5
Other-- (4)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities 331 (333) (800)
    
Cash flows from financing activities   
Dividends paid to the Company's shareholders (241) (237) (162)
Receipt of long-term debt 1,746 966 1,278
Repayment of long-term debt (2,115) (1,387) (1,365)
Short-term credit from banks and others, net (283) 147 14
Other (1)- (4)
Net cash used in financing activities (894) (511) (239)
    
Net change in cash and cash equivalents 57 3 (73)
Cash and cash equivalents as at the beginning of the year 83 87 161
Net effect of currency translation on cash and cash equivalents (24) (2) (1)
Cash and cash equivalents included as part of assets held for sale 5 (5)-
Cash and cash equivalents as at the end of the year 121 83 87

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

* See Note 10.
F - 7

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Year Ended
December 31 (cont'd)
Additional Information

 
For the year
ended 31, December
 201820172016
 $ millions$ millions$ millions

Income taxes paid, net of refunds 56 127 84
Interest paid 103 111 112

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
F - 8

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018
Note 1 – General

A.The reporting entity


A. The reporting entity
Israel Chemicals Ltd. (hereinafter – “the Company” or “ICL”)the Company), is a company domiciled and incorporated in Israel theIsrael. The Company's shares of which are traded on both the Tel-Aviv Stock Exchange (TASE) and the New York Stock Exchange.Exchange (NYSE). The address of the Company’s registered officeheadquarter is 23 Aranha St., Tel-Aviv,Tel‑Aviv, Israel. The Company is a subsidiary of Israel Corporation Ltd., a public company traded on the TASE. The Company together with its subsidiaries, associated companies and joint ventures (hereinafter – “the Group”)the Group or ICL), is a leading specialty minerals group that operates a unique, integrated business model. The Company competitively extracts certain minerals as raw materials and utilizes sophisticated processing and product formulation technologies to add value to customers in three attractivetwo main end-markets: agriculture and Industrial (including food and engineered materials. The Company operates via two segments: (1) Essential Minerals, which extracts the raw materials for ICL and markets them to the potash, phosphate and magnesium markets; and (2) Specialty Solutions, which primarily produces bromine from the Dead Sea and manufactures and markets bromine and phosphorus compounds for the electronics, construction, oil & gas drillings and automotive industries; downstream products, mainly a broad range of acids, specialty phosphates and specialty minerals used as food additives and industrial intermediates; specialty fertilizers, liquid fertilizers and soluble fertilizers and slow-release fertilizers and controlled-release fertilizers; creative food ingredients and phosphate additives, which provide texture and stability solutions for the food markets. The Company is a subsidiary of Israel Corporation Ltd.

The Company’s principal assets include: one of the world’s richest, longest-life and lowest-cost sources of potash and bromine (the Dead Sea), potash mines in the United Kingdom and Spain, bromine compounds processing facilities located in Israel, the Netherlands and China, a unique integrated phosphate value chain, beginning with phosphate rock mines in the Negev Desert in Israel and running up to production facilities of value-added products in Israel, Europe, the United States, Brazil and China, an extensive global logistics and distribution networks with operations in over 30 countries. The Company has a focused and highly-experienced staff that develops production processes, new applications, formulations and products for its 3 key end markets – agriculture, food and engineered materials.

ICL operates in the markets for potash, bromine, pure phosphoric acid, special phosphates, bromine-based and phosphorus-based flame retardants and chemicals for the prevention of the spreading of fires.

additives). ICL’s products are used mainly in the areas of agriculture, electronics, food, fuel and gas exploration, water purification and desalination, detergents, cosmetics, medicines vehicles and others.

The Company’s overseas operations consist mainly of the production of products that are integrated with or based on the activities of the companies in Israel or in closely related fields. About 95% of the Group’s products are sold to customers outside of Israel.

vehicles.

The State of Israel holds a Special State Share in ICL and in some of its subsidiaries, entitling the State the right to safeguard the State of Israel interests (see Note 21).

B. Definitions
B.1.DefinitionsSubsidiary – a company over which the Company has control and the financial statements of which are fully consolidated with the Company's statements as part of the consolidated financial statements.

1. Subsidiary – a company over which the Company has control and the financial statements of which are fully consolidated with the Company's statements as part of the consolidated financial statements.

F-8

Note 1 – General

B.2.Definitions (cont’d)Investee company – Subsidiaries and companies, including a partnership or joint venture, the Company's investment in which is accounted for, directly or indirectly, using the equity method.

2. Investee company – Subsidiaries and companies, including a partnership or joint venture, the Company's investment in which is stated, directly or indirectly, on the equity basis.

3. Related party – Within its meaning in IAS 24 (2009), “Related Party Disclosures”.

3.Related party – Within its meaning in IAS 24 (2009), “Related Party Disclosures”.

Note 2 - Basis of Preparation of the Financial Statements

A.Statement of compliance with International Financial Reporting Standards


A. Statement of compliance with International Financial Reporting Standards
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared by the GroupICL in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Boards (IASB).

The consolidated financial statements were authorized for issuance by the Company’s Board of Directors on March 14, 2017.

B.Functional and presentation currency

February 26, 2019.

B. Functional and presentation currency
The consolidated financial statements are presented in United States Dollars (“US Dollars”; $), which is the functional currency of the Company and have been rounded to the nearest million, except when otherwise indicated.
Items included in the consolidated financial statements of the Company are measured using the currency of the primary economic environment in which the individual entity operates (“the functional currency”).
F - 9

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018
Note 2 - Basis of Preparation of the Financial Statements (cont’d)

C. Basis of measurement
The consolidated financial statements are presented in United States Dollars (“US Dollars”; $), which is the functional currency of the Company.

C.Basis of measurement

The consolidated financial statements have beenwere prepared onusing the historical cost basis except for the following assets and liabilities: derivative financial instruments, securities held for trading that are measured at fair value, non-current assets groups held-for-sale, Investments in associates and joint ventures, deferred tax assets and liabilities, provisions and assets and liabilities in respect of employee benefits.

For further information regarding the measurement of these assets and liabilities, see Note 3 regarding significant accounting policies.

D.Operating cycle

below.

D. Operating cycle
The Company’s regular operating cycle is up to one year. As a result, the current assets and the current liabilities include items the realization of which is intended and anticipated to take place within one year.

E.
E. Use of estimates and judgment
The preparation of estimates and judgment

The financial statements in conformity with IFRS requires the management to make judgments, estimates and assumptions that affect the application of accounting policies and the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, income and expenses. Actual results may differ from these estimates.


Note 2 - Basis of Preparation of the Financial Statements (cont’d)

E.Use of estimates and judgment (cont’d)

The evaluation of accounting estimates used in the preparation of the Group’sICL’s financial statements requires management of the Company to make assumptions regarding laws interpretations which apply to the Company, circumstances and events that involve considerable uncertainty. Management of the Company prepares the estimates based on the basis of past experience, various facts, external circumstances, and reasonable assumptions according tobased on the pertinent circumstances of each estimate. Estimates and underlying assumptions are reviewed on an ongoing basis. Revisions to accounting estimates are recognized in the period in which the estimates are revised and in any future periods affected.

F - 10

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018
Note 2 - Basis of Preparation of the Financial Statements (cont'd)

E. Use of estimates and judgment (cont'd)
Information about assumptions made by the GroupICL with respect to the future and other reasons for uncertainty with respect to estimates that have a significant risk of resulting in a material adjustment to carrying amounts of assets and liabilities in the next financial year are included in the following notes:

table:

Note 2 - Basis of Preparation of the Financial Statements (cont'd)

EstimateE.Use of estimates and judgment (cont'd)

EstimatePrincipal assumptionsPossible effectsReference
Recognition of deferred tax asset

Tax rates expected to apply when the timing differences applied to Beneficiary Enterprise are realized is based on forecasts of future revenues to be earned. The reasonability of future revenues to be earned to use future tax benefits.

Recognition or reversal of deferred tax asset in profit or loss.See Note 17.17 regarding taxes on income
Uncertain tax positions

The extent of the certainty that the Group’sICL’s tax positions will be accepted (uncertain tax positions) and the risk of it incurring any additional tax and interest expenses. This is based on an analysis of a number ofseveral matters including interpretations of tax laws and the Group’s pastICL’s experience.

Recognition of additional income tax expenses.See Note 17.17 regarding taxes on income
Post-employment employee benefitsActuarial assumptions such as the discount rate, future salary increases and the future pension increase.

An increase or decrease in the post-employment defined benefit obligation.

See Note 18 regarding employee benefits.
Assessment of probability of contingent and environmental liabilities including cost of waste removal/restoration

Whether it is more likely than not that an outflow of economic resources will be required in respect of potential liabilities under the environmental protection laws and legal claims pending against ICL and the Company and its investees.estimation of their amounts. The waste removal/ restoration obligation dependsobligations depend on the reliability of the estimates of future removal costs.

costs and interpretation of regulations.
Creation, adjustment or reversal of a provision for a claim and/or environmental liability including cost of waste removal/restoration.See Note 20 regarding contingent liabilities

Recoverable amount of a cash generating unit, among other things, containing goodwill

TheExpected cash-flow forecasts, the discount rate, market risk and a budgetedthe forecasted growth rate.Change in impairment loss.See Note 13 regarding impairment testing.
Assessment of the fair value of the assets and liabilities acquired in business combinationsExpected cash-flowcash‑flow forecasts of the acquired business, and models for calculating the fair value of the acquired items and their depreciation and amortization periods.

Impact on the balance of assets and liabilities acquired and the depreciation and amortization in the statement of income.

 
Assessment of the net realizable value of inventoryFuture selling price and expected replacement price when used as the best available evidence for realizable value.

Decrease in the carrying value of the inventories and the results of operations accordingly.

 
Concessions, permits and business licenses
Forecast of obtaining renewed concessions, permits and business licenses which constitute the basis for the Company's continued operations and /or the Company's expectations regarding the holding of the operating assets by it and / or by a subsidiary until the end of their useful lives
Impact on the value of the operation, depreciation periods and residual values of related assets.
See Note 20 regarding contingent liabilities
Mineral reserves and resource deposits

Quantities and qualities estimates of mineral reserves and resource deposits are based on engineering, economic and geological data that is compiled and analyzed by the Company’s engineers and geologists.

Impact on the useful life of the assets relating to the relevant activity. 

F-11

F - 11

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018
Note 2 - Basis of Preparation of the Financial Statements (cont'd)

F. Changes in accounting policies
1.Initial application of IFRS 9 (2014), Financial Instruments
As of January 1, 2018, ICL applies IFRS 9, Financial Instruments (hereinafter - the standard), which replaces IAS 39, Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement (hereinafter - IAS 39) and the consequential amendments to IFRS 7, Financial Instruments: Disclosures, and to IAS 1, Presentation of Financial Statements. Implementation of the Standard did not have a material effect on the financial statements and, therefore, the balance of retained earnings as of January 1, 2018 was not adjusted.
Classification and measurement of financial assets and financial liabilities
The standard contains three principal classification categories for financial assets: (1) measured at amortized cost; (2) fair value through profit or loss; and (3) fair value through other comprehensive income. The classification of financial assets under IFRS 9 is generally based on the business model in which a financial asset is managed and its contractual cash flow characteristics. The standard eliminates the previous IAS 39 categories of held to maturity, loans and receivables and available for sale. There was no significant change to the classification or measurement of financial liabilities.
On the initial implementation date, the Company chose to designate the investment in YYTH shares at fair value through other comprehensive income (under IAS 39, the investment in YYTH shares was classified as an available-for-sale financial asset). For further information on the measurement and classification of financial instruments, see Note 3.
Financial assets value impairment
The standard replaces the impairment model of IAS 39 with an 'expected credit loss' (ECL) model. The model applies to financial assets measured at amortized cost, investments in debt instruments measured at fair value through other comprehensive income, contract assets (IFRS 15) and lease receivables. The model will not apply to investments in equity instruments.
2.IFRS 15, Revenue from Contracts with Customers
As of January 1, 2018, ICL applies International Financial Reporting Standard 15 (hereinafter - the standard) which provides new guidance on revenue recognition. ICL elected to apply the standard using the cumulative effect approach. Implementation of the Standard did not have a material effect on the financial statements and, therefore, the balance of retained earnings as of January 1, 2018 was not adjusted.
The standard introduces a new five step model for recognizing revenue from contracts with customers: (1) Identifying the contract with the customer; (2) Identifying distinct performance obligations in the contract; (3) Determining the transaction price; (4) Allocating the transaction price to distinct performance obligations; and (5) Recognizing revenue when the performance obligations are satisfied.
ICL recognizes revenue when the customer obtains control over the promised goods or services. The revenue is measured according to the amount of the consideration to which ICL expects to be entitled in exchange for the goods or services promised to the customer, other than amounts collected for third parties. For further information, see Note 3.
F - 12

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018

Note 3 - Significant Accounting Policies

The accounting policies in accordance with IFRS are consistently applied by the GroupICL companies for all the periods presented in these consolidated financial statements.

A.Basis for Consolidation

A. Basis for Consolidation
1.Business combinations

The Group

ICL implements the acquisition method to all business combinations. The acquisition date is the date on which the acquirer obtains control over the acquiree. Control exists when the GroupICL is exposed or has rights to variable returns from its involvement with the acquiree and it has the ability tocould affect those returns through its power over the acquiree. Substantive rights held by the GroupICL and others are taken into accountconsidered when assessing control.

The Group

ICL recognizes goodwill on acquisition according to the fair value of the consideration transferred including any amounts recognized in respect of non-controlling interest in the acquiree as well as the fair value at the acquisition date of any pre-existing equity right of the GroupICL in the acquiree, less the net amount of the identifiable assets acquired, and the liabilities assumed.

On the acquisition date the acquirer recognizes a contingent liability assumed in a business combination if there is a present obligation resulting from past events and its fair value can be reliably measured. If the Group pays a bargain price for the acquisition (meaning including negative goodwill), it recognizes the resulting gain in profit or loss on the acquisition date. Furthermore, goodwill is not adjusted in respect of the utilization of carry-forward tax losses that existed on the date of the business combination.

The consideration transferred includes the fair value of the assets transferred to the previous owners of the acquiree, the liabilities incurred by the acquirer from the previous owners of the acquiree and equity instruments that were issued by the Group. In a step acquisition, the difference between the acquisition date fair value of the Group’s pre-existing equity rights in the acquiree and the carrying amount at that date is recognized in profit or loss under other income or expenses. In addition, the consideration transferred includes the fair value of any contingent consideration.

Costs associated with the acquisition that were incurred by the acquirerICL in a business combination such as finder’s fees, advisory, legal, valuation and other professional or consulting fees, other than those associated with an issue of debt or equity instruments connected to the business combination, are expensed in the period the services are received.

2.Subsidiaries

Subsidiaries are entities that are controlled by the Group.ICL. The financial statements of the subsidiaries are included in the consolidated financial statements from the date control was acquiredcommenced until the date control ceases to exist. The accounting policies of subsidiaries have been changed when necessary to align them with the accounting policies adopted by the Group.

ICL.
3.Structured entities
ICL operates with structured entities for purposes of securitization of financial assets. ICL has no direct or indirect holdings in the shares of the structured entities. A structured entity is included in the financial statements where it is controlled by the Company.
4.Non-controlling interests

Non-controlling interests comprise of the subsidiary's equity of a subsidiary that cannot be attributed, directly or indirectly, to the parent company and they include additional components such as: the equity component of convertible debentures of subsidiaries, share-based payments that will be settled with equity instruments of subsidiaries and share options of subsidiaries.


Note 3 - Significant Accounting Policies (cont’d)

A.Basis for Consolidation (cont’d)

3.Non-controlling interests (cont'd)

Measurement of non-controlling interests on the date of the business combination:

Non-controllingcombination – Non‑controlling interests that are instruments that give rise to a present ownership interest and entitle the holder to a share of net assets in the event of liquidation (for example: ordinary shares), are measured onat the date of the business combination at either fair value, or at their proportionate interest in the identifiable assets and liabilities of the acquiree, on a transaction-by-transaction basis.

F - 13

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018
Note 3 - Significant Accounting Policies (cont’d)

A. Basis for Consolidation (cont’d)
4.Non-controlling interests (cont’d)
Allocation of profit or loss and other comprehensive income to the shareholders:

shareholders - Profit or loss and any part of other comprehensive income are allocated to the owners of the Company and the non-controlling interests. Total profit or loss and other comprehensive income is allocated to the owners of the Company and the non-controlling interests even if the result is a negative balance of non-controlling interests.

interests

Transactions with non-controlling interests, while retaining control:

control - Transactions with non-controlling interests while retaining control are accounted for as equity transactions. Any difference between the consideration paid or received and the change in the non-controllingnon‑controlling interests is included in the share of the owners of the Company directly in a separate category in equity.

The amount of the adjustment to non-controlling interests is calculated as follows:

- For an increase in the holding rate, according to the proportionate share acquired from the balance of non-controlling interests in the consolidated financial statements prior to the transaction. For a decrease in the holding rate, according to the proportionate share realized by the owners of the subsidiary in the net assets of the subsidiary, including goodwill.

Furthermore, when the holding rate of the subsidiary changes, while retaining control, the Company re-attributes the accumulated amounts that were recognized in other comprehensive income to the owners of the Company and the non-controlling interests.

4.5.Loss of control

Upon the loss of control, the GroupICL derecognizes the assets and liabilities of the subsidiary, any non-controlling interests and the other components of equity related to the subsidiary. If the GroupICL retains any interest in the previous subsidiary, then such interest is measured at fair value at the date that control is lost. The difference between the sum of the proceeds and fair value of the retained interest, and the derecognized balances is recognized in profit or loss under other income or other expenses. Subsequently the retained interest is accounted for as an equity-accounted investee or as a financial asset in accordance with the provisions of IAS 39,IFRS 9, depending on the level of influence retained by the GroupICL in the relevant company. The amounts recognized in capital reserves through other comprehensive income with respect to the same subsidiary are reclassified to profit or loss or to retained earnings in the same manner that would have been applicable if the subsidiary had itself realized the same assets or liabilities.

earnings.

Note 3 - Significant Accounting Policies (cont’d)

A.Basis for Consolidation (cont’d)

5.6.Transactions eliminated onin consolidation

Intra-group balances and transactions, and any unrealized income and expenses arising from intra-group transactions, are eliminated in preparing the consolidated financial statements. Unrealized gains arising from transactions with associates and joint ventures are eliminated against the investment to the extent of the Group’sICL’s interest in these investments. Unrealized losses are eliminated in the same way as unrealized gains, but only to the extent that there is no evidence of impairment.

F - 14

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018
Note 3 - Significant Accounting Policies (cont’d)

A. Basis for Consolidation (cont’d)
6.7.Investment in associates and joint ventures (equity accounted investees)

Associates are those entities in which the GroupICL has significant influence, but not control or joint control, over the financial and operating policies. There is a rebuttable presumption that significant influence is presumed to existexists when the Groupa company holds between 20% and 50% of another entity. In assessing significant influence, potential voting rights that are currently exercisable or convertible into shares of the investee are taken into account.

considered.

Joint ventures are joint arrangements in which the GroupICL has rights to the net assets of the arrangement.

Associates and joint ventures are accounted for using the equity method (equity accounted investees) and are recognized initially at cost. The cost of the investment includes transaction costs. The cost of the investment includes transaction costs. Transaction costs that are directly attributable to an expected acquisition of an associate or joint ventures are recognized as an asset as part of the item of deferred expenses in the statement of financial position. These costs are added to the cost of the investment on the acquisition date. The consolidated financial statements include the Group’s share of the income and expenses in profit or loss and of other comprehensive income of equity accounted investees, after adjustments to align the accounting policies with those of the Group, from the date that significant influence or joint control commences until the date that significant influence or joint control ceases.

7.Loss of significant influence or joint control

The Group discontinues applying the equity method from the date it loses significant influence in an associate or joint control in a joint venture and it accounts for the retained investment as a financial asset or subsidiary, as relevant.

On the date of losing significant influence, the Group measures at fair value any retained interest it has in the former associate or joint venture. The Company recognizes in profit or loss under other income or expenses any difference between the sum of the fair value of the retained interest and any proceeds received from the partial disposal of the investment in the associate or joint ventures, and the carrying amount of the investment on that date.

The amounts recognized in equity through other comprehensive income with respect to the same associate or joint ventures are reclassified to profit or loss or to retained earnings in the same manner that would have been applicable if the associate or joint venture had itself realized the same assets or liabilities.


Note 3 - Significant Accounting Policies (cont’d)

B.Foreign Currency

B. Foreign Currency
1.Transactions in foreign currency

Transactions in foreign currency are translated intoto the functional currency of the Company and each of its subsidiaries based on the exchange rate in effect on the dates of the transactions. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currency on the report date are translated into the functional currency of the Company and each of its subsidiaries based on the exchange rate in effect on that date. Exchange rate differences in respect of monetary items are the difference between the net book value in the functional currency at the beginning of the year adjusted for effective interest and payments during the year, plus the payments during the year and the net book value in foreign currency translated based on the rate of exchange at the end of the year. Exchange rate differences deriving from translation into the functional currency are recognized in the consolidated statement of income. Non-monetary
Non‑monetary items denominated in foreign currency and measured in terms of historical cost are translated using the exchange rate in effect onat the date of the transaction.

2.Foreign operations

The assets and liabilities of foreign operations, including goodwill and fair value adjustments arising on acquisition, are translated to USD at exchange rates at the reporting date. The income and expenses of foreign operations are translated to USD at exchange rates at the dates of the transactions.

Foreign currency differences are recognized in other comprehensive income and are presented in equity in the foreign currency translation reserve (hereinafter –Translation Reserve).

When the foreign operation is a non-wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, then the relevant proportionate share of the foreign operation translation difference is allocated to the non-controlling interests. When a foreign operation is disposed of such that control, significant influence or joint control is lost, the cumulative amount in the Translation Reserve related to that foreign operation is reclassified to profit or loss as a part of the gain or loss on disposal.

Furthermore, when the Group’sICL’s interest in a subsidiary that includes a foreign operation changes, while retaining control in the subsidiary, a proportionate part of the cumulative amount of the translation difference that was recognized in other comprehensive income is reattributed to non-controlling interests.

When

F - 15

Notes to the Group disposes of only part of its investment in an associate or joint venture that includes a foreign operation, while retaining significant influence or joint control, the proportionate part of the cumulative amount of the translation difference is reclassified to profit or loss.

Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018

Note 3 - Significant Accounting Policies (cont’d)
B. Foreign Currency (cont'd)
2.Foreign operations (cont'd)
Generally, foreign currency differences from a monetary item receivable from or payable to a foreign operation, including foreign operations that are subsidiaries, are recognized in profit or loss in the consolidated financial statements. Foreign exchange gains and losses arising from a monetary item receivable from or payable to a foreign operation, the settlement of which is neither planned nor likely in the foreseeable future, are considered to form part of a net investment in a foreign operation and are recognized in other comprehensive income and are presented within equity in the Translation Reserve.


Note 3 - Significant Accounting Policies (cont’d)

C.Financial Instruments

C. Financial Instruments
1.Non-derivative financial assets (IFRS9)

Initial recognition of financial assets:

The Group

ICL initially recognizes loans andtrade receivables and depositsdebt instruments issued on the date that they are created.originated. All other financial assets acquired in a regular way purchase, including assets designated at fair value through profit or loss, are recognized initially on the trade date at which the GroupICL becomes a party to the contractual provisions of the instrument, meaninginstrument. A financial asset is initially measured at fair value plus transaction costs that are directly attributable to the acquisition or issuance of the financial asset. A trade receivable without a significant financing component is initially measured at the transaction price. Receivables originating from contract assets are initially measured at the carrying amount of the contract assets on the date the Group undertookclassification was changed from contract asset to purchase or sell the asset. Non-derivative financial instruments comprise investments in equity and debt securities, trade and other receivables, including service concession receivables and cash and cash equivalents.

receivables.

Derecognition of financial assets:

Financial assets are derecognized when the contractual rights of the GroupICL to the cash flows from the asset expire, or the GroupICL transfers the rights to receive the contractual cash flows on the financial asset in a transaction in which substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership of the financial asset are transferred. Any interest in transferredWhen ICL retains substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership of the financial assets that is created or retained byasset, it continues to recognize the Group is recognized as a separate asset or liability. Regular way salesfinancial asset.
Classification of financial assets into categories and the accounting treatment of each category
Financial assets are recognizedclassified at initial recognition to one of the following measurement categories: (1) amortized cost; (2) fair value through other comprehensive income – investments in debt instruments; (3) fair value through other comprehensive income – investments in equity instruments; or (4) fair value through profit or loss. Financial assets are not reclassified in subsequent periods unless, and only if, ICL changes its business model for the management of financial debt assets, in which case the affected financial debt assets are reclassified at the beginning of the period following the change in the business model.
F - 16

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018

Note 3 - Significant Accounting Policies (cont’d)

C. Financial Instruments (cont'd)
1.Non-derivative financial assets (IFRS9) (cont'd)
A financial asset is measured at amortized cost if it meets both of the following conditions and is not designated at fair value through profit or loss: (1) It is held within a business model whose objective is to hold assets so as to collect contractual cash flows; and (2) the contractual terms of the financial asset give rise to cash flows representing solely payments of principal and interest on the principal amount outstanding on specified dates.
In certain cases, on initial recognition of an equity investment that is not held for trading, ICL irrevocably elects to present subsequent changes in the investment’s fair value in other comprehensive income. This election is made on an investment-by-investment basis.
ICL has balances of trade date, meaning onand other receivables and deposits that are held within a business model whose objective is collecting contractual cash flows, which represent solely payments of principal and interest (for the datetime value and the Company undertook to sell the asset.

The Group classifies itscredit risk). Accordingly, these financial assets according to the following categories:

are measured at amortized cost.

Subsequent measurement and gains and losses - Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss

A financial asset is classified at fair value through profit or loss if it is classified as held for trading or is designated as such upon initial recognition. Financial

These assets at fair value through profit or loss are subsequently measured at fair value,value. Net gains and changes therein are recognized in profitlosses, including any interest income or loss. Attributable transaction costsdividend income, are recognized in profit or loss (other than certain derivatives designated as incurred. Financial assets designatedhedging instruments).
Subsequent measurement and gains and losses - Investments in equity instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income
These assets are subsequently measured at fair value. Dividends are recognized as income in profit or loss, include equity investments that otherwise would have been classified as available for sale.

Loansunless the dividend clearly represents a recovery of part of the cost of the investment. Other net gains and receivables

Loanslosses are recognized in other comprehensive income and receivables are non-derivative financialnever reclassified to profit or loss.

Subsequent measurement and gains and losses - Financial assets with fixed or determinable payments that are not quoted in an active market. Suchat amortized cost
These assets are recognized initially at fair value plus any directly attributable transaction costs. Subsequent to initial recognition loans and receivables aresubsequently measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method, less anymethod. The amortized cost is reduced by impairment losses.

Loans Interest income, foreign exchange gains and receivables comprise cashlosses and cash equivalents, trade and other receivables, investmentsimpairment are recognized in non-marketable debentures and service concession receivables.

Cash and cash equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents include cash balances available for immediate use and call deposits. Cash equivalents include short-term highly liquid investments (with original maturities of three monthsprofit or less) that are readily convertible into known amounts of cash and are exposedloss. Any gain or loss on derecognition is recognized in profit or loss.

F - 17

Notes to insignificant risks of change in value.

the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018

Note 3 - Significant Accounting Policies (cont’d)

C.Financial Instruments (cont’d)

1.Non-derivative financial Assets (Cont’d)

Available-for-sale financial assets

Available-for-sale financial assets are non-derivative financial assets that are designated as available-for-sale or that are not classified in any of the previous categories. The Group’s investments in certain equity securities are classified as available-for-sale financial assets. Available-for-sale financial assets are recognized initially at fair value plus any directly attributable transaction costs. Subsequent to initial recognition, they are measured at fair value and changes therein, other than impairment losses, and foreign currency differences, are recognized directly in other comprehensive income and presented within equity in a reserve for financial assets classified as available-for-sale. A dividend received in respect of available-for-sale financial assets is recognized in profit or loss on the date the entity’s right to receive the dividend is established. When an investment is derecognized, the cumulative gain or loss in the reserve for available-for-sale financial assets is transferred to profit or loss.


C. Financial Instruments (cont'd)
2.Non-derivative financial Liabilitiesliabilities

Non-derivative financial liabilities include bank overdrafts, loans and borrowings from banks and others, marketable debt instruments, finance lease liabilities, and trade and other payables.

Initial recognition of financial liabilities:

The Group

ICL initially recognizes debt securities issued on the date that they originated. All other financial liabilities are recognized initially on the trade date at which the GroupICL becomes a party to the contractual provisions of the instrument.

Subsequent Measurement of Financial Liabilities:
Financial liabilities (other than financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss) are recognized initially at fair value less any directly attributable transaction costs. Subsequent to initial recognition these financial liabilities are measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method. Financial liabilities are designated at fair value through profit or loss if the Group manages such liabilities and their performance is assessed based on their fair value in accordance with the Group’s documented risk management strategy, providing that the designation is intended to prevent an accounting mismatch, or the liability is a combined instrument including an embedded derivative.

Derecognition of financial liabilities:

Financial liabilities are derecognized when the obligation of the Group,ICL, as specified in the agreement, expires or when it is discharged or cancelled.

Change in terms of debt instruments:

An exchange of debt instruments having substantially different terms, between an existing borrower and lender is accounted for as an extinguishment of the original financial liability and the recognition of a new financial liability at fair value. Furthermore, a substantial modification of the terms of the existing financial liability or part of it, is accounted for as an extinguishment of the original financial liability and the recognition of a new financial liability.

In such cases the entire difference between the amortized cost of the original financial liability and the fair value of the new financial liability is recognized in profit or loss as financing income or expense.


Note 3 - Significant Accounting Policies (cont’d)

C.Financial Instruments (cont’d)

2.Non-derivative financial Liabilities (cont’d)

The terms are substantially different if the discounted present value of the cash flows according to the new terms, including any commissions paid, less any commissions received and discounted using the original effective interest rate, is different by at least ten percent from the discounted present value of the remaining cash flows of the original financial liability.

In addition to the aforesaid quantitative criterion, the GroupICL examines, inter alia, whether there have also been changes in various economic parameters inherent in the exchanged debt instruments therefore(e.g. linkage).

F - 18

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as a rule, exchanges of CPI-linked debt instruments with unlinked instruments are considered exchanges with substantially different terms even if they do not meet the aforementioned quantitative criterion.

at December 31, 2018


Note 3 - Significant Accounting Policies (cont’d)

C. Financial Instruments (cont'd)
2.Non-derivative financial liabilities (cont'd)
Upon the swap of debt instruments with equity instruments, equity instruments issued at the extinguishment and de-recognition of all or part of a liability, are a part of “consideration paid” for purposes of calculating the gain or loss from de-recognition of the financial liability. The equity instruments are initially recognized at their fair value, unless fair value cannot be reliably measured – in which case the issued instruments are measured at the fair value of the derecognized liability. Any difference between the amortized cost of the financial liability and the initial measurement amount of the equity instruments is recognized in profit or loss under financing income or expenses.

Offset of financial instruments:

Financial assets and liabilities are offset, and the net amount presented in the statement of financial position when, and only when, the GroupICL currently has a legal right to offset the amounts and intends either to settle on a net basis or to realize the asset and settle the liability simultaneously.

3.Derivative financial instruments

The Group

ICL holds derivative financial instruments for the purpose of economic hedging againstin order to reduce exposure to foreign currency risks, risks with respect to commodity prices, marine shipping prices, and interest risks.

Derivatives are recognized according to fair value and the attributable transaction costs are recorded in the statement of income as incurred. Changes in the fair value of the derivatives are recorded in the statement of income, except for derivatives used to hedge cash flows, as detailed below.

Cash flow hedges

Changes in the fair value of derivatives used to hedge cash flows, in respect of the effective portion of the hedge, are recorded through other comprehensive income directly in a capitalhedging reserve. With respect to the non-effectivenon‑effective part, changes in the fair value are recognized in the statement of income. The amount accumulated in the capital reserve is reclassified and included in the statement of income in the same period as the hedged cash flows affected profit or loss under the same line item in the statement of income as the hedged item.

Where the hedged item is a non-financial asset, the amount recorded in the capital reserve is transferred to the book value of the asset, upon recognition thereof.


Note 3 - Significant Accounting Policies (cont’d)

C.Financial Instruments (cont’d)

3.Derivative financial instruments (cont’d)

Cash flow hedges (cont’d)

If the hedging instrument no longer meets the criteria for hedge accounting, expires or is sold, terminated or exercised, then hedge accounting is discontinued.discontinued prospectively. The cumulative gain or loss previously recognized throughin the other comprehensive income and presented in the hedging reserve in equity remains there until the forecasted transaction occurs or is no longer expected to occur. Ifoccur and then, will be reclassified to the forecasted transaction is no longer expected to occur, the cumulative gain or loss previously recognized in the hedging reserve is recognized immediately in profit or loss.

F - 19

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018

Note 3 - Significant Accounting Policies (cont’d)

C. Financial Instruments (cont’d)
3.Derivative financial instruments (cont'd)
Economic hedge that does not meet the conditions of an accounting hedge

Changes in the fair value of derivatives that do not meet the conditions of an accounting hedge in accordance with IFRS, after the date of the initial recognition thereof, are recorded in the statement of income as financing income or expenses.

4.CPI-linked assets and liabilities not measured at fair value

The carrying amountvalue of index-linked financial assets and liabilities, which are not measured at fair value, are revaluedis re-measured every period in accordance with the actual rate of increase/ decrease in the CPI.

5.Financial guarantees

A financial guarantee is initially recognized at fair value. In subsequent periods a financial guarantee is measured at the higher of the amount recognized in accordance with the guidelines of IAS 37 and the liability initially recognized after being amortized in accordance with the guidelines of IAS 18. Any resulting adjustment of the liability is recognized in profit or loss.

6.Share capital

Ordinary shares

Ordinary shares are classified as equity. Incremental costs directly attributable to the issue of ordinary shares and share options are recognized as a deduction from equity, net of any tax effects.

Incremental costs directly attributable to an expected issuance of an instrument that will be classified as an equity instrument are recognized as an asset in deferred expenses in the statement of financial position. The costs are deducted from the equity upon the initial recognition of the equity instruments or are amortized as financing expenses in the statement of income when the issuance is no longer expected to take place.

Treasury shares

When share capital recognized as equity is repurchased by the Group,ICL, the amount of the consideration paid, which includes directly attributable costs, net of any tax effects, is recognized as a deduction from equity. Repurchased shares are classified as treasury shares. When treasury shares are sold or reissued subsequently, the amount received is recognized as an increase in equity, and the resulting surplus on the transaction is carried to share premium, whereas a deficit on the transaction is deducted from retained earnings.

F - 20

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018

Note 3 - Significant Accounting Policies (cont’d)

D.Property, plant and equipment


D. Property, plant and equipment
1.Recognition and measurement

Property, plant and equipment are presented at cost after deducting the related amounts of government grants and less accumulated depreciation and provision for impairment.

The cost includes expenses that can be directly attributed to purchasethe acquisition of the asset.asset after deducting the related amounts of government grants. The cost of assets that were constructed independentlyself-constructed includes the cost of the materials and direct salary costs,labor, as well as any additional costs that are directly attributable to bringing the asset to the required position and condition so that it will be able to function as management intended, as well as an estimate of the costs to dismantle and remove the items and to restore its location, where there is an obligation to dismantle and remove or to restore the site and capitalized borrowing costs. The cost of purchased software, which constitutes an inseparable part of operating the related equipment, is recognized as part of the cost of saidthe equipment.

Spare parts for facilities are valued at cost determined based on the moving average method, after recording a write-downwrite‑down in respect of obsolescence. The portion designated for current consumption is presented in the “inventories” category in the current assets section.

Where significant parts of an item of property, plant and equipment (including costs of major periodic inspections) have different life expectancies, they are treated as separate items (significant components) of the property, plant and equipment.

Changes in a commitment to dismantle and remove items and to restore their location, except for changes stemming from the passage of time, are added to or deducted from the cost of the asset in the period in which they occur. The amount deducted from the cost of the asset does not exceed its book value and any balance is recognized immediately in profit or loss. Gains and losses on disposal of a property, plant or equipment item are determined by comparing the proceeds from disposal with the carrying amount of the asset and are recognized net in the income statement in the “other income”other income or “other expenses” category,other expenses, as applicable.

2.Subsequent costs (costs incurred after the initial recognition date)

The cost of replacing part of an item of property, plant and equipment and other subsequent costs are recognized as part of the book value of the item if it is expected that the future economic benefit inherent therein will flow to the GroupICL and that its cost can be reliably measured. The book value of the part that was replaced is derecognized. Routine maintenance costs are charged to the statement of income as incurred.

2.Subsequent Costs (after initial recognition)
The cost of replacing part of a fixed asset item and other subsequent expenses are capitalized if it is probable that the future economic benefits associated with them will flow to ICL and their cost can be measured reliably. The carrying amount of the replaced part of a fixed asset item is derecognized. The costs of day-to-day servicing are expensed as incurred.
F - 21

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018

Note 3 - Significant Accounting Policies (cont’d)

D. Property, plant and equipment (cont’d)
3.Depreciation

Depreciation is a systematic allocation of the depreciable amount of an asset over its estimated useful life. The depreciable amount is the cost of the asset, or other amount substituted for cost, less its residual value. Depreciation of an item of property, plant and equipment begins when itthe asset is available for its intended use, that is, when it has reached the place and condition required in order that it can be used in the manner contemplated for it by Management.


Note 3 - Significant Accounting Policies (cont’d)

D.Property, plant and equipment (cont’d)

Depreciation is recorded in the statement of income according to the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of each significant component of the property, plant and equipment items, since this most closely reflects the expected pattern of consumption of the future economic benefits embodied in the asset. Owned land is not depreciated.

The estimated useful life for the current period and comparative periods is as follows:

 In Years
Land development, roads and structures15–3015-30
Facilities, machinery and equipment (1)8–258-25
Dams and ponds (2)20–4020-40
Heavy mechanical equipment, train cars and tanks5–155-15
Office furniture and equipment, motor vehicles, computer equipment and other3–103-10

(1)

Mainly 25 years

(2)

Mainly 40 years

The estimates regarding the depreciation method, examination of signs indicating a change in the useful lives and the residual value, are reviewedCompany reviews, at least at the end of every reporting year, the estimates regarding the depreciation method, useful lives and are adjusted,the residual value, and adjusts them if appropriate. Once every five years, the Company makes an active examination ofactively examines the useful lives of the main property, plant and equipment items and, if required, it updates them. Over the said useful lives and/or the residual value. Based on past experience,years, the Company has succeeded in maintaining the useful lives of part of property, plant and equipment items – this being as a result of investments therein and other current, ongoing maintenance thereof.

E.Intangible Assets

E. Intangible Assets
1.Goodwill

Goodwill recorded as a result ofconsequent to the acquisition of subsidiaries is presented as part of intangible assets.

Subsequent measurement

Goodwill is measured at cost less accumulated losses from impairment.

impairment charges, under intangible assets.
2.Costs of exploration and evaluation of resources

Costs incurred in respect of exploration of resources and the evaluation thereof are recognized as intangible assets. The expenditures are recognized on theat cost basis less a provision for impairment.impairment, under intangible assets. The cost includes, among other things,inter‑alia, costs of performing research studies, drilling costs and activities in connection with assessing the technical feasibility with respect to the commercial viability of extracting the resources.

F - 22

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018

Note 3 - Significant Accounting Policies (cont’d)
E. Intangible Assets (cont'd)
3.Research and development

Expenditures for research activities are recognized in profit or lossexpensed as incurred.

Development expenditures are recordedrecognized as intangible asset only if development costs can be measured reliably, the product or process is technically, and commercially feasible, future economic benefits are probable, and the GroupICL has the intention and sufficient resources to complete development and to use or sell the asset. Other development expenditures costs are recognized in profit or lossexpensed as incurred. Subsequent to initial recognition, development expenditures are measured at cost less accumulated amortization and any accumulated impairment loss.

losses.

Note 3 - Significant Accounting Policies (cont’d)

E.Intangible Assets (cont'd)

4.Other intangible assets

Other intangible assets purchased by the Group,ICL, with a defined useful life, are measured according to cost less accumulated amortization and accumulated losses from impairment.

Intangible assets with indefinite useful lives are measured according to cost less accumulated losses from impairment.

5.Subsequent costs

Subsequent costs are recognized as an intangible asset only when they increase the future economic benefit inherent in the asset for which they were incurred. All other costs, including costs relating to goodwill or trademarks developed independently, are charged to the statement of income as incurred.

6.Amortization

Amortization is a systematic allocation of the amortizable amount of an intangible asset over its useful life. The amortizable amount is the cost of the asset less its residual value. Amortization is recorded in the statement of income according to the straight-line method from the date the assets are available for use, over the estimated useful economic life of the intangible assets, except for customer relationships and geological surveys, which are amortized according to the rate of consumption of the economic benefits expected from the asset based on the basis of cash flow forecasts. Goodwill and intangible assets having an indefinite lifespan are not amortized on a systematic basis but, rather, are examined at least once a year for purposes of impairment in value.

Internally generated intangible assets are not systematically amortized as long as they are not available for use, i.e. they are not yet on site or in working condition for their intended use. Accordingly, these intangible assets, such as development costs, are tested for impairment at least once a year, until such date as they are available for use.

F - 23

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018

Note 3 - Significant Accounting Policies (cont’d)
E. Intangible Assets (cont'd)
6.Amortization (cont'd)
The estimated useful life for the current period and comparative periods is as follows:

 In Years
Concessions – over the balance of the concession granted to the companies 
Software costs3–103-10
Trademarks15–2015-20
Customer relationships15–2515-25
Agreements with suppliers and non-competition agreement10-15
Patents7–20
7-20

Deferred expenses in respect of geological surveys are amortized over their useful life based on a geological estimate of the amount of the material that will be produced from the mining site.

The estimates regarding the amortization method and useful life are reviewed, at a minimum, at the end of every reporting year and are adjusted where necessary. The GroupICL assesses the useful life of the customer relationships on an ongoing basis, based on an analysis of all of the relevant factors and evidence, considering the experience the Company has with respect to recurring orders and churn rates and considering the future economic benefits expected to flow to the Company from these customer relationships.


Note 3 - Significant Accounting Policies (cont’d)

E.Intangible Assets (cont’d)

Amortization methods, useful lives and residual values are reviewed at the end of each reporting year and adjusted if appropriate.

The Group

ICL periodically examines the estimated useful life of an intangible asset that is not amortized, at least once a year, in order to determine if events and circumstances continue to support the determination that the intangible asset has an indefinite life.

F.Leased Assets

F. Leased Assets
Leases, where the GroupICL assumes substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership of the asset, are classified as financing leases. Upon initial recognition, the leased assets are measured, and a liability is recognized at an amount equal to the lower of its fair value or the present value of the future minimum lease payments. Subsequent to initial recognition, the asset is accounted for in accordance with the accounting policy applicable to that asset.

Other leases are classified as operating leases where the leased assets are not recognized in the Group’sICL’s statement of financial position. Payments under an operating lease are recorded in the statement of income on the straight-line method, over the period of the lease.

G.Inventories

F - 24

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018

Note 3 - Significant Accounting Policies (cont’d)
G. Inventories
Inventories are measured at the lower of cost or net realizable value. The cost of the inventories includes the costs of purchasing the inventories and bringing it to its present location and condition. In the case of work in process and finished goods, the cost includes the proportionate part of the manufacturing overhead based on normal capacity. Net realization value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business, after deduction of the estimated cost of completion and the estimated costs required to execute the sale.

The cost of the inventories of raw and auxiliary materials, maintenance materials, finished goods and goods in process, is determined mainly according to the “moving average” method.

If the benefit from stripping costs (costs of removing waste produced as part of a mine's mining activities during its production stage) is realized in the form ofattributable to inventories, the Company accounts for these stripping costs as inventories. In a case where the benefit is improved access to the quarry, the Company recognizes the costs as a non-currentnon‑current addition to the asset, provided the criteria presented in IFRIC 20 are met.

Inventories which are expected to be sold in a period of more than 12 months from the reporting date are presented as non-current inventories, as part of non-current assets.


Note 3 - Significant Accounting Policies (cont’d)

H.Capitalization of Borrowing Costs

H. Capitalization of Borrowing Costs
A qualifying asset is an asset that requires a significant period of time to prepare for its intended use or sale. Specific and non-specific borrowing costs are capitalized to qualifying assets (assets that require a significant period of time to prepare them for their intended use or sale) during the period required for their completion and establishment until the time when they are ready for their intended use. Non-specific borrowing costs are capitalized to the investment in qualifying assets using an interest rate that is the weighted-average of the interest rates in respect of those credit sources that were not capitalized specifically. Other borrowing costs are charged to "financing expenses" in the statement of income as incurred. Income earned on the temporary investment of specific credit received for investing in a qualifying asset is deducted from the borrowing costs eligible for capitalization.

I.Impairment

1. Non-derivative Financial assets

An impairment of a financial asset not carried at fair value through profit or loss, is examined when there is objective evidence that one or more events have occurred that may have had a negative impact on the estimate of the future cash flows from the asset that can be estimated reliably.

Objective evidence that financial assets have been impaired can include a contractual default by a debtor, restructuring of an amount due to the Group on terms that the Group would not otherwise consider, indications that a debtor or issuer will enter into bankruptcy, or the disappearance of an active market for a security.

When testing for impairment available-for-sale financial assets that are equity instruments, the Group also examines the difference between the fair value of the asset and its original cost while taking into consideration the standard deviation of the instrument’s price, the length of time the fair value of the asset is lower than its original cost and changes in the technological, economic or legal environment or in the market environment in which the issuer of the instrument operates. In addition, a significant or prolonged decline in its fair value below its cost is objective evidence of impairment.

The Group examines evidence of impairment for receivables and loans on a specific basis.

The loss from impairment in the value of a financial asset measured according to amortized cost is calculated as the difference between the book value of the asset and the present value of the estimated future cash flows, discounted using the original effective interest rate. Losses are recognized in profit or loss and reflected in a provision for loss against the balance of the financial asset measured at amortized cost.

I. Impairment losses on available-for-sale financial assets are recognized by transferring the cumulative loss that has been recognized in a capital reserve to profit or loss. The cumulative loss that is classified from other comprehensive income to profit or loss is the difference between the acquisition cost, net of any principal repayment and amortization, and the current fair value, less any impairment loss previously recognized in profit or loss. Changes in impairment provisions attributable to application of the effective interest method are reflected in the item of financing income.


Note 3 - Significant Accounting Policies (cont’d)

I.Impairment (cont’d)

1.Non-derivative Financial assets (cont’d)

An impairment loss is reversed if the reversal can be related objectively to an event occurring after the impairment loss was recognized (such as repayment by the debtor). For

Provision for expected credit losses in respect of a financial assets measuredasset at amortized cost, and available-for-saleincluding trade receivables, will be measured at an amount equal to the full lifetime of expected credit losses. Expected credit losses are a probability-weighted estimate of credit losses. With respect to other debt instruments, provision for expected credit losses will be measured at an amount equal to 12-month expected credit losses, unless their credit risk has increased significantly since initial recognition. Provision for such losses in respect of a financial assets that are debt securities,asset at amortized cost, will be presented net of the reversal is recognized in profit or loss. For available-for-sale financial assets that are equity securities,gross book value of the reversal is recognized directly in other comprehensive income.

asset.
2.Non-financial assets

In every reporting period, an examination is made with respect to whether there are signs indicating impairment in value of the Group’sICL’s non-financial assets, other than inventories and deferred tax assets. If such signs exist, the estimated recoverable amount of the asset is calculated. The GroupICL conducts an annual examination, on the same date, of the recoverable amount of goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite useful lives or those that are not available for use – or more frequently if there are indications of impairment.

For

F - 25

Notes to the purpose of impairment testing,Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018

Note 3 - Significant Accounting Policies (cont’d)
I.Impairment (cont'd)
2.Non-financial assets (cont'd)
Assets that cannot be tested individually are grouped together into the smallest group of assets that generates cash inflows from continuing use that are largely independent of the cash inflows of other assets or groups of assets (the “cash-generating unit”).

Goodwill is not monitored for internal reporting purposes and, accordingly, it is allocated to the Company’s operating segments and not to the cash- generating units, the level of which is lower than the operating segment.

The recoverable amount of an asset or a cash- generating unit is the higher of its value in use or the net selling price (fair value less cost of disposal). When determining the value in use the GroupICL discounts the anticipated future cash flows according to a discount rate that reflects the evaluations of the market's participants regarding the time value of money and the specific risks relating to the asset or to the cash- generating unit, in respect of which the future cash flows expected to derive from the asset or the cash- generating unit were not adjusted. The goodwill is not monitored for internal reporting purposes and, accordingly, it is allocated to the Company’s operating segments and not to the cash- generating units, the level of which is lower than the operating segment.

Assets of the Company's headquarters – assets of the Company's headquartersand administrative facilities do not produce separate cash flows and they serve more than one cash-producing unit. Assets of the Company's headquartersSuch assets are allocated to cash-producingcash‑producing units on a reasonable and consistent basis and are examined for impairment as part of the examination of impairment of the cash-producingcash‑producing units to which they are allocated.

Impairment losses are recognized if the carrying amount of an asset or cash-producing unit in the books exceeds its estimated recoverable amount and are recognized in profit or loss. Regarding anthe statement of income. For operating segmentsegments that includesinclude goodwill, an impairment loss is recognized when the value of the operating segment in the books exceeds its recoverable value. Impairment losses recognized in respect of an operating segment are allocated first to reduce the carrying amount of anyits goodwill of this operating segment and then to reduce the carrying amounts in the books of the other assets of that segment on a proportionate basis.


Note 3 - Significant Accounting Policies (cont’d)

I.Impairment (cont’d)

2.Non-financial assets (cont’d)

An impairment loss is allocated between the owners of the Company and the non-controlling interests on the same basis that the profit or loss is allocated.

A loss from impairment in value of goodwill is not cancelled. Regarding other assets with respect to which losses from impairments of value were recognized in previous periods is not reversible prospectively. A loss from impairment of other assets recognized in each reporting period an examinationprevious periods is made asexamined in future periods to assess whether there are signs indicating that these losses have decreased or no longer exist. A loss from impairment of value is cancelledreversed if there has beenis a change in the estimates used to determine the recoverable value, only if the book value of the asset, after cancellationreversal of the loss from impairment of value, does not exceed the book value, after deduction of depreciation or amortization, that would have been determined if the loss from impairment of value had not been recognized.

F - 26

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018
Note 3 - Significant Accounting Policies (cont’d)
I.Impairment (cont'd)
3.Investments in associates and joint ventures

An investment in an associate or joint venturesventure is tested for impairment when objective evidence indicates there has been impairment.

Goodwill that forms part of the carrying amount of an investment in an associate or joint ventures is not recognized separately, and therefore is not tested for impairment separately.

If objective evidence indicates that the value of the investment may have been impaired, the Group

ICL estimates the recoverable amount of the investment, which is the greater of its value in use and its net selling price. In assessing value in use of an investment in an associate or joint ventures, the Groupventure, ICL either estimates its share of the present value of estimated future cash flows that are expected to be generated by the associate or joint ventures,venture, including their cash flows from operations of the associate or joint ventures and thetheir consideration from the final disposal of the investment, or estimates the present value of the estimated future cash flows that are expected to be derived from dividends that will be received and from the final disposal.

An impairment loss is recognized when the carrying amount of the investment, after applying the equity method, exceeds its recoverable amount, and it is recognized in profit or loss under other expenses. An impairment loss is not allocated to any asset, including goodwill that forms partthe statements of the carrying amount of the investment in the associate or in the joint ventures.

income. An impairment loss is reversed only if there has been a change in the estimates used to determine the recoverable amount of the investment after the impairment loss was recognized, and only to the extent that the investment’s carrying amount, after the reversal of the impairment loss, does not exceed the carrying amount of the investment that would have been determined by the equity method if no impairment loss had been recognized.


Note 3 - Significant Accounting Policies (cont’d)

J.Employee Benefits

The Group

J. Employee Benefits
ICL has several post-employment benefit plans. The plans are funded partly by deposits with insurance companies, financial institutions or funds managed by a trustee, and theytrustee. The plans are classified as defined contribution plans and as defined benefit plans.

1.Defined contribution plans

1. Defined contribution plans
A defined contribution plan is a post-employment benefit plan under which the GroupICL pays fixed contributions into a separate entity and has no legal or constructive obligation to pay further amounts.

The Group’s

ICL’s obligation to make deposits in a defined contribution plan is recorded as an expense in the statement of income in the periods during which the employees provided the services. Contributions to a defined contribution plan, that are due more than 12 months after the end of the period in which the employees render the service are discounted to their present value.

2.Defined benefit plans

2. Defined benefit plans
Defined benefit plans are retirement benefit plans that are not defined contribution plans.

The Group’s

ICL’s net obligation, regarding defined benefit plans for post-employment benefits, is calculated for each plan separately by estimating the future amount of the benefit to which an employee will be entitled as compensation for his services in the current and past periods. The benefit is presented at present value after deducting the fair value of the plan assets. The discount rate for the GroupICL companies operating in countries having a “deep” market wherein there is a high level of trading in corporate bonds is in accordance with the yield on the corporate bonds, including Israel. The discount rate for the GroupICL companies operating in countries not having a market wherein there is a high level of trading in corporate bonds, as stated above, is in accordance with the yield on government bonds – the currency and redemption date of which are similar to the terms binding the Group.ICL. The calculations are performed by a qualified actuary using the projected unit credit method.

When on

F - 27

Notes to the basis of the calculationsConsolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018
Note 3 - Significant Accounting Policies (cont’d)

J. Employee Benefits (cont’d)
2. Defined benefit plans (cont’d)
When a net asset is created for the Group,ICL, the asset is recognized up to the net present value of the available economic benefits in the form of a refund from the plan or by a reduction in future deposits to the plan. An economic benefit in the form of a refund from the plan or a reduction in future deposits will be considered available when it can be realized in the lifetime of the plan or after settlement of the obligation.

Costs in respect of past services are recognized immediately and without reference to whether or not the benefits have vested.

The movement in the net liability in respect of a defined benefit plan that is recognized in every accounting period in the statement of income is comprised of the following:

(i)(1)Current service costs – the increase in the present value of the liability deriving from employees’ service in the current period.

(ii)(2)The net financing income (expenses) are calculated by multiplying the net defined benefit liability (asset) by the discount rate used for measuring the defined benefit liability, as determined at the beginning of the annual reporting period.

(iii)(3)Exchange rate differences;

(iv)(4)Past service costs and plan reduction – the change in the present value of the liability in the current period as a result of a change in post-employment benefits attributed to prior periods.

Note 3 - Significant Accounting Policies (cont’d)

J.Employee Benefits (cont’d)

2.Defined benefit plans (cont'd)

The difference, as at the date of the report, between the net liability as at the beginning of the periodyear plus the movement in profit and loss as detailed above, and the actuarial liability less the fair value of the fund assets at the end of the period,year, reflects the balance of the actuarial income or expenses recognized in other comprehensive income and is recorded in retained earnings.

The current interest costs and return on plan assets are recognized as expenses and interest income in the respective financing category.

3.Other long-term employee benefits

3. Other long-term employee benefits
Some of the Company’s employees are entitled to other long-term benefits that do not relate to a post-retirement benefit plan. Actuarial gains and losses are recorded directly to the statement of income in the period in which they arise.

In cases where the amount of the benefit is the same for every employee, without taking into accountconsidering the years of service, the cost of the benefit is recognized when entitlement to the benefit is determined. The amount of these benefits is discounted to its present value in accordance with an actuarial evaluation.

4.Early retirement pay

F - 28

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018

Note 3 - Significant Accounting Policies (cont’d)

J. Employee Benefits (cont’d)
4. Early retirement pay
Early retirement pay is recognized as an expense and as a liability when the GroupICL has clearly undertaken to pay it, without any reasonable chance of cancellation, in respect of termination of employees before they reach the customary age of retirement according to a formal, detailed plan. The benefits provided to employees upon voluntary retirement are charged when the GroupICL proposes a plan to the employees encouraging voluntary retirement, it is expected that the proposal will be accepted, and it is possible to reliably estimate the number of employees that will accept the proposal. If benefits are payable more than 12 months after the reporting period, then they are discounted to their present value. The discount rate is the yield at the reporting date on high-quality, index-linked corporate debentures, the denominated currency of which is the payment currency and that have maturity dates approximating the terms of the Group’sICL’s obligations.

5.Short-term benefits

5. Short‑term benefits
Obligations for short-term employee benefits are measured on a non-discounted basis, and the expense is recorded at the time the said service is provided or upon the actual absence of the employee when the benefit is not accumulated (such as maternity leave).

A provision for short-term employee benefits in respect of cash bonuses or profit-sharing plans is recognized for the amount expected to be paid, when the GroupICL has a current legal or implied obligation to pay for the said amount for services provided by the employee in the past and it is possible to reliably estimate the obligation.

Classification of employee benefits as a short-termshort‑term employee benefit or a long-termlong‑term employee benefit (for measurement purposes) is determined based on the Group'sICL's expectation with respect to full utilization of the benefits and not based on the date on which the employee is entitled to utilize the benefit.


Note 3 - Significant Accounting Policies (cont’d)

J.Employee Benefits (cont’d)

6.Share-based compensation

6. Share-based compensation
The fair value on the grant date of share-based compensation awards granted to employees is recognized as a salary expense, with a corresponding increase in equity, over the period that the employees become unconditionally entitled to the awards. The amount recognized as an expense in respect of share-based compensation awards that are conditional upon meeting vesting conditions that are service conditions and non-market performance conditions, is adjusted to reflect the number of awards that are expected to vest.

K.Provisions

F - 29

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018

Note 3 - Significant Accounting Policies (cont’d)

K. Provisions
A provision is recognized when the GroupICL has a present legal or implied obligation as the result of an event that occurred in the past, that can be reliably estimated and when it is expected that an outflow of economic benefits will be required in order to settle the obligation. The provisions are made by means of discounting of the future cash flows at a pre-tax interest rate reflecting the current market estimates of the time value of money and the risks specific to the liability, and without taking into accountconsidering the Company’s credit risk. The book value of the provision is adjusted in every period in order to reflect the amount of time that has elapsed and is recognized as financing expenses. In rare cases where it is not possible to estimate the outcome of a potential liability, no provision is recorded in the financial statements.

The Group

ICL recognizes a reimbursement asset if, and only if, it is virtually certain that the reimbursement will be received if the Company settles the obligation. The amount recognized in respect of the reimbursement does not exceed the amount of the provision.

1.(1)Warranty

A provision for warranty is recognized when the products or services, in respect of which the warranty is provided, are sold. The provision is based on historical data and on a weighting of all possible outcomes according to their probability of occurrence.

2.(2)Provision for environmental costs

The Group

ICL recognizes a provision for an existing obligation for prevention of environmental pollution and anticipated provisions for costs relating to environmental restoration stemming from current or past activities.

Costs for preventing environmental pollution that increase the life expectancy or efficiency of a facility or decrease or prevent the environmental pollution are recorded as a provision, are capitalized to the cost of the property, plant and equipment and are depreciated according to the usual depreciation rates used by the Group.

ICL.
3.(3)Restructuring
A provision for restructuring is recognized when ICL has approved a detailed and formal restructuring plan, and the restructuring either has commenced or has been announced publicly. The provision includes direct expenditures caused by the restructuring and necessary for the restructuring, and which are not associated with the continuing activities of ICL.
(4)Site restoration
In accordance with ICL’s environmental policy and applicable legal requirements, a provision for site restoration in respect of contaminated land, and the related expense, is recognized when the land is contaminated.
F - 30

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018

Note 3 - Significant Accounting Policies (cont’d)

K. Provisions (cont'd)
(5)Legal claims

A provision for legal claims is recognized when the GroupICL has a present legal or constructive obligation as a result of an event that occurred in the past, if it is more likely than not that an outflow of economic resources will be required to settle the obligation and it can be reliably estimated. Where the time value is significant, the provision is measured based on its present value.

L. Revenue Recognition
Identifying a contract
ICL accounts for a contract with a customer only when the following conditions are met:
(a)The parties to the contract have approved the contract (in writing, orally or according to other customary business practices) and they are committed to satisfying the obligations attributable to them;
(b)ICL can identify the rights of each party in relation to the goods or services that will be transferred;
(c)ICL can identify the payment terms for the goods or services that will be transferred;
(d)The contract has a commercial substance (i.e. the risk, timing and amount of the entity’s future cash flows are expected to change as a result of the contract); and
(e)It is probable that the consideration, to which ICL is entitled to in exchange for the goods or services transferred to the customer, will be collected.
For the purpose of paragraph (e) above, ICL examines, inter alia, the percentage of the advance payments received and the spread of the contractual payments, past experience with the customer and the status and existence of sufficient collateral. If a contract with a customer does not meet all of the above criteria, consideration received from the customer is recognized as a liability until the criteria are met or when one of the following events occurs: ICL has no remaining obligations to transfer goods or services to the customer and any consideration promised by the customer has been received and cannot be returned; or the contract has been terminated and the consideration received from the customer cannot be refunded.
Combination of contracts
ICL combines two or more contracts entered into on the same date or on proximate dates with the same customer (or related parties of the customer) and accounts for them as one contract when one or more of the following conditions are met:
(a)Negotiations were held on the contracts as one package with a single commercial purpose;
(b)The amount of the consideration in one contract depends on the price or performance of a different contract; or
(c)The goods or services promised in the contracts (or certain goods or services promised in each one of the contracts) are a single performance obligation.
F - 31

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018

Note 3 - Significant Accounting Policies (cont’d)


L. Revenue Recognition (cont'd)
Identifying performance obligations
On the contract’s inception date, ICL assesses the goods or services promised in the contract with the customer and identifies as a performance obligation any promise to transfer to the customer one of the following:
L.(a)Revenue RecognitionGoods or services (or a bundle of goods or services) that are distinct; or

Sale

(b)A series of distinct goods or services that are substantially the same and have the same pattern of transfer to the customer.
ICL identifies goods

Revenue or services promised to the customer as being distinct when the customer can benefit from the sale of goods or services on their own or in conjunction with other readily available resources and ICL’s promise to transfer the goods or services to the customer is separately identifiable from other promises in the ordinary coursecontract. In order to examine whether a promise to transfer goods or services is separately identifiable, ICL examines whether it is providing a significant service of businessintegrating the goods or services with other goods or services promised in the contract into one integrated outcome that is measured at the fair valuepurpose of the contract.

An option that grants the customer the right to purchase additional goods or services constitutes a separate performance obligation in the contract only if the option grants to the customer a material right it would not have received without the original contract.
Determining the transaction price
The transaction price is the amount of the consideration receivedto which ICL expects to be entitled in exchange for the goods or receivable, netservices promised to the customer, other than amounts collected for third parties. ICL considers the effects of returns, trade discountsall the following elements when determining the transaction price: variable consideration, the existence of a significant financing component, non-cash consideration, and volume rebates. Whenconsideration payable to the credit period is short and constitutescustomer. As ICL does not engage in agreements with payment terms exceeding one year, it applies the accepted creditpractical expedient included in the industry,standard to not separate a significant financing component where the future consideration is not discounted.

Revenue is recognized when persuasive evidence exists (usually indifference between the formtime of an executed sales agreement) thatreceiving payment and the significant risks and rewardstime of ownership have been transferredtransferring the goods or services to the buyer, recovery of the considerationcustomer is probable, the associated costsone year or less.

M. Financing Income and possible return of goods can be estimated reliably, there is no continuing management involvement with the goods, and the amount of revenue can be measured reliably. If it is probable that discounts will be granted and the amount can be measured reliably, then the discount is recognized as a reduction of revenue when the sales are recognized.

Transfers of risks and rewards vary depending on the individual terms of the contract of sale. For sales of products in Israel, transfer usually occurs when the product is received at the customer’s warehouse, but for some international shipments transfer occurs upon loading the goods onto the relevant carrier.

M.Financing Income and Expenses

Expenses

Financing income includes income from interest on amounts invested, gains from derivative financial instruments recognized in the statement of income, and gains fromon the disposal of available-for-sale financial assets. Interest income is recognized as accrued, using the effective interest method.

Financing expenses include interest on loans received, changes in the time value of provisions, securitization transaction costs, losses from impairment or disposal of available for sale financial assets, losses from derivative financial instruments, changes due to the passage of time in liabilities in respect of defined benefit plans for employees less interest income deriving from plan assets of a defined benefit plan for employees and losses from exchange rate differences. Borrowing costs, which are not capitalized, are recorded in the income statement using the effective interest method.

F - 32

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018
Note 3 - Significant Accounting Policies (cont’d)

M. Financing Income and Expenses (cont'd)
Gains and losses from exchange rate differences and from derivative financial instruments are reported on a net basis, as financing income or financing expenses, based on the fluctuation in the exchange rates and based on their position (net gain or loss).

In the consolidated statements of cash flows, interest received and interest paid, are presented as part of cash flows from operating activities. Dividends paid are presented as part of cash flows from financing activities.


Note 3 - Significant Accounting Policies (cont’d)

N.Taxes on Income

N. Taxes on Income
Taxes on income include current and deferred taxes. Current tax and deferred tax are recognized in profit or loss except to the extent thatunless they relate to a business combination or are recognized directly in equity or in other comprehensive income to the extentwhen they relate to items recognized directly in equity or in other comprehensive income.

Current tax is the expected tax payable (or receivable) on the taxable income for the year, using tax rates enacted or substantively enacted at the reporting date. Current taxes also include taxes in respect of prior years and any tax arising from dividends. Current tax assets and liabilities are offset if there is a legally enforceable right to offset current tax liabilities and assets, and there is intent to settle current tax liabilities and assets on a net basis or the tax assets and liabilities will be realized simultaneously.

A provision for uncertain tax positions, including additional tax and interest expenses, is recognized when it is more probablelikely than not that the GroupICL will have to use its economic resources to pay the obligation.

Recognition of deferred taxes relates to temporary differences between the book values of the assets and liabilities for purposes of financial reporting and their value for tax purposes. The Company does not recognize deferred taxes for the following temporary differences: initial recognition of goodwill, initial recognition of assets and liabilities for transactions that do not constitute a business combination and do not impact the accounting income and the income for tax purposes, as well as differences deriving from investments in subsidiaries, investee companies and associated companies that are presented according to equity method, if it is not expected that they will reverse in the foreseeable future and if the GroupICL controls the date the provision will reverse, whether via sale or distribution of a dividend. The deferred taxes are measured according to the tax rates expected to apply to the temporary differences at the time they are realized, based on the basis of the law that was finally legislated or effectively legislated as at the date of the report.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset if there is a legally enforceable right to offset deferred tax liabilities and assets, and they relate to income taxes levied by the same tax authority on the same taxable entity, or on different tax entities, but they intend to settle deferred tax liabilities and assets on a net basis or their deferred tax assets and liabilities will be realized simultaneously.

A deferred tax asset is recognized in the books when it is expected that in the future there will be taxable income against which the temporary differences can be utilized. Deferred tax assets are examined at each reporting date and are reduced to the extent that it is no longer probable that the related tax benefit will be realized.

F - 33

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018
Note 3 - Significant Accounting Policies (cont’d)

N. Taxes on Income (cont'd)
Deferred taxes that were not recognized are re-evaluatedre‑evaluated at every reporting date and are recognized if the expectation has changed such that it is expected that in the future there will be taxable income against which it will be possible to utilize them.


Note 3 - Significant Accounting Policies (cont’d)

N.Taxes on Income (cont'd)

The Group

ICL could become liable for additional taxes in the case of distribution of intercompany dividends between the GroupICL's companies. These additional taxes are not included in the financial statements in light of the policy of the Groupas ICL's companies decided not to cause distribution of a dividend that involves additional taxes to the paying company in the foreseeable future. In cases where an investee company is expected to distribute a dividend involving additional tax, the Company records a reserve for taxes in respect of the said additional tax it is expected to incur due to distribution of the dividend. Additional income taxes that arise from the distribution of dividends by the Company are recognized in profit or loss at the same time thatwhen the liability to pay the related dividend is recognized.

Deferred taxes in respect of intra-company transactions in the consolidated financial statements are recorded according to the tax rate applicable to the buying company.

O.Earnings per share

The Group

O. Earnings per share
ICL presents basic and diluted earnings per share data for its ordinary share capital. The basic earnings per share are calculated by dividing the income or loss attributable to the holders of the Company’s ordinary shares by the weighted-average number of ordinary shares outstanding during the year, after adjustment in respect of treasury shares. The diluted earnings per share are determined by adjusting the income or loss attributable to the holders of the Company’s ordinary shares and the weighted-average number of ordinary shares outstanding after adjustment in respect of treasury shares and for the effect of restricted shares and options for shares granted to employees.

P.Non-current assets and disposal groups held for sale

P. Transactions with controlling shareholder
Assets and liabilities included in a transaction with a controlling shareholder are measured at fair value on the date of the transaction. As the transaction is on the equity level, the Company includes the difference between the fair value and the consideration from the transaction in its equity.
Q. Non-current assets and disposal groups held for sale
Non-current assets (or disposal groups composed of assets and liabilities) are classified as held for sale if it is highly probable that they will be recovered primarily through a sale transaction and not through continuing use. This applies also to when the Company is obligated to a sale plan that involves losing control over a subsidiary, whether or not the Company will retain any non-controlling interests in the subsidiary after the sale.

Immediately before classification as held for sale, the assets (or components of the disposal group) are remeasured in accordance with the Group’sICL’s accounting policies. Thereafter, the assets (or components of the disposal group) are measured at the lower of their carrying amount and fair value less costs to sell.

F - 34

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018

Note 3 - Significant Accounting Policies (cont’d)
Q. Non-current assets and disposal groups held for sale (cont'd)
Any impairment loss on a disposal group is initially allocated to goodwill, and then to remaining assets on pro rata basis, except that no loss is allocated to assets that are not in the scope of the measurement requirements of IFRS 5 such as: inventories, financial assets, deferred tax assets and employee benefit assets, which continue to be measured in accordance with the Group’sICL’s accounting policies. Impairment losses recognized on initial classification as held for sale, and subsequent gains or losses on remeasurement, are recognized in profit or loss. Gains are not recognized in excess of any cumulative impairment loss.

In subsequent periods, depreciable assets classified as held for sale are not depreciated on a periodic basis.


Note 3 - Significant Accounting Policies (cont'd)

Q.
R. New Standards and Interpretations not yet Adopted

IFRS 15, Revenue from Contracts with Customers

IFRS 15 replaces the current guidance regarding recognition of revenues and contains a comprehensive framework for determining whether revenue should be recognized and when and at what amount. IFRS 15 is applicable for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2018 and earlier application is permitted. The Company has examined the effects of applying IFRS 15, and in its opinion the effect on the financial statements will be immaterial. The Company has no plans to early adopt IFRS 15.

IFRS 9 (2014), Financial Instruments

The Standard replaces the current guidance in IAS 39, Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement. IFRS 9 (2014) includes revised guidance regarding the classification and measurement of financial instruments, a new ‘expected credit loss’ model for calculating impairment for most financial assets, and new guidance and requirements with respect to hedge accounting.

IFRS 9 (2014) is effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2018 with early adoption being permitted. The Standard is to be applied retrospectively with some exemptions. The Company has examined the effects of applying IFRS 9 (2014), and in its opinion the effect on the financial statements will be immaterial. The Company has no plans to early adopt IFRS 9.

Interpretations not yet adopted

IFRS 16, Leases

(hereinafter – “IFRS 16” or the "standard")

IFRS 16 The standard replaces International Accounting StandardIAS 17, Leases (IAS 17) and its related interpretations. The standard's instructions replaceannul the existing requirement from lessees to classify leases as operating or finance leases. Instead of this, for all lessees apart of the exemption, theThe new standard presents a unified model for the accounting treatment of all leases according to which the lessee has to recognize a right-of-use asset and a lease liability in its financial statements.
Manner of implementation and expected implementation
The standard will be implemented for annual periods starting on January 1, 2019. The Company plans to apply the transitional provision of recognizing a lease liability at the initial application date according to the present value of the future lease payments discounted at a group borrowing rate at that date, and concurrently recognizing a right-of-use asset at the same amount of the liability, adjusted for any repaid or accrued lease payments that were recognized as an asset or liability before the date of initial application. Therefore, application of the standard is not expected to influence the balance of retained earnings and equity at the date of initial application.
Main Expedients the Company elected:
1)Not applying the requirement to recognize a right-of-use asset and a lease liability in respect of short-term leases of up to one year. Furthermore, not applying the requirement to recognize a right-of-use asset and a lease liability for leases that end within 12 months from the date of initial application.
2)Not separating non-lease components from lease components and instead accounting for all the lease components and related non-lease components as a single lease component.
3)Relying on a previous assessment of whether an arrangement contains a lease in accordance with current guidance, IAS 17, Leases, and IFRIC 4, Determining whether an Arrangement contains a Lease, with respect to agreements that exist at the date of initial application.
4)Not applying the requirement to recognize a right-of-use asset and a lease liability in respect of leases where the underlying asset has a low value.
F - 35

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018

Note 3 - Significant Accounting Policies (cont’d)
R. New Standards and Interpretations not yet adopted (cont'd)
IFRS 16, Leases (hereinafter – “IFRS 16” or the "standard") (cont'd)
For leases in which the Company is the lessee and which were classified before the date of initial application as operating leases, except for when the Company has elected to apply the standard’s expedients as aforesaid, the Company will recognize a right-of-use asset and a lease liability at initial application for all the leases that award it control over the use of identified assets for a specified period of time. Based on the assessment as at December 31, 2018, the changes in the initial application are expected to result in an increase of $280 million in the balance of right-of-use assets and in the balance of the lease liabilities. Accordingly, depreciation and amortization expenses will be recognized in respect of the right of use asset, and the need for recognizing impairment of the right-of-use asset will be examined in accordance with IAS 36. Furthermore, financing expenses will be recognized in respect of the lease liabilities. Therefore, as from the date of initial application, the lease payments relating to assets leased under an operating lease, will be recognized as a right-of-use asset and depreciated in subsequent periods as a part of depreciation and amortization expenses and as interest expenses. ICL's discount rates used for measuring the lease liability are in the range of 3.4% to 6.4%. The Company does not anticipate any material implications on its ability to satisfy the required financial covenants, as described in Note 15.
IFRIC 23, Uncertainty Over Income Tax Treatments (hereinafter – “IFRIC 23”)
IFRIC 23 clarifies how to apply the recognition and measurement requirements of IAS 12 for uncertainties in income taxes. According to IFRIC 23, when determining the taxable profit (loss), tax bases, unused tax losses, unused tax credits and tax rates when there is uncertainty over income tax treatments, the entity should assess whether it is probable that the tax authority will accept its tax position. If it is probable that the tax authority will accept the entity’s tax position, the entity will recognize the tax effects on the financial statements according to that tax position. If it is not probable that the tax authority will accept the entity’s tax position, the entity is required to reflect the uncertainty in its financial statements. Similarly,accounts. IFRIC 23 also emphasizes the standard determines newneed to provide disclosures of the judgments and expanded disclosure requirements from those required at present.

The standard will becomeassumptions made by the entity regarding uncertain tax positions.

IFRIC 23 is effective for annual reporting periods as ofbeginning on or after January 1, 2019, with the possibility of early adoption, so long as the company has also early adopted IFRS 15 – Revenue from contracts with customers.2019. The standardinterpretation includes a number oftwo alternatives for applying the implementation of transitional provisions, so that companies can choose one of the following alternatives at the implementation date: fullbetween retrospective implementationapplication or implementation (with the possibility of certain practical expedients)prospective application as from the effective date while adjustingfirst reporting period in which it initially applied the balance of retained earnings at that date. interpretation.
The Company is examininghas examined the effectsimplications of IFRS 16applying IFRIC 23, and in its opinion the effect on the financial statements with no plans for early adoption.

R.Indices and exchange rates

will be immaterial.

S. Indexes and exchange rates
Balances in or linked to foreign currency are included in the financial statements at the representative exchange rate on the date of the report. Balances linked to the Consumer Price Index (hereinafter – “the CPI”) are included based on the basis of the index relating to each linked asset or liability.

F - 36

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018

Note 4 - Determination of Fair Values

As part of the accounting policies and disclosures, the GroupICL is required to determine the fair value of both financial and non-financial assets and liabilities. The fair values have been determined for measurement and/or disclosure purposes based on the methods described below. Further information about the assumptions made in determining the fair values is disclosed in the notes specific to that asset or liability.

A.Property, plant and equipment

The fair value of property, plant and equipment recognized

A. Investments in a business combination is based on the cost model or on the market value model. According to the cost model, the fair value of the property, plant and equipment is based on the depreciated replacement price of the item measured. The depreciated replacement price takes into account adjustments in respect of physical wear and tear and obsolescence of the property, plant and equipment item. According to the market value model, the fair value is based on the selling price determined in sale transactions of similar assets, while making adjustments to the asset items sold and the asset item acquired in the business combination.

B.Intangible assets

The fair value of patents and trademarks acquired in a business combination is based on the discounted estimated royalty payments that would be required to be paid if the patent or trademark was not owned. The fair value of customer relationships acquired in a business combination is determined using the multi-period excess earnings method, whereby the fair value of the asset is estimated after deducting a fair return on all other assets that are part of creating the related cash flows.

The fair value of other intangible assets is based on the discounted cash flows expected to be derived from the use and eventual sale of the assets.

C.Inventories

The fair value of inventories acquired in a business combination is determined as follows:

(1) Finished goods inventories – on the basis of the estimated selling price of the products in the ordinary course of business, less the estimated selling costs as well as a reasonable margin in respect of the efforts required for sale of the inventories.

(2) Inventory of work-in-progress – determined on the basis of estimates described in Section 1 above, less costs required for its completion.

(3) Inventory of raw materials – based on replacement value.

D.Investments in securities

securities

The fair value of financial assets classified as available-for-salefair value through other comprehensive income -investments in equity instruments and as held-for-tradingfair value through profit and loss, is determined based on their market price at date of the report. If the asset or liability measured at fair value has a bid price and an ask price, the price in the range between them that best reflects fair value under the circumstances will be used for measuring fair value.


Note 4 - Determination of Fair Values (cont'd)

E.Derivatives

B. Derivatives
The fair value of forward contracts on foreign currency is determined by averaging the exchange rate and the appropriate interest coefficient for the period of the transaction and the relevant currency index.

The fair value of currency options is determined based on the Black and Scholes model, taking into accountconsidering the intrinsic value, standard deviation and the interest rates.

The fair value of interest rate swap contracts is determined by discounting the estimated amount of the future cash flows based on the basis of the terms and length of period to maturity of each contract, while using market interest rates of similar instruments at the date of measurement.

Future contracts on energy and marine shipping prices are presented at fair value based on the basis of quotes of the prices of products on an ongoing basis.

The reasonableness of the market price is examined by comparing it to quotations by banks.

For further information regarding the fair value hierarchy, see Note 23 regarding financial instruments.

F.Liabilities in respect of debentures

C. Liabilities in respect of debentures
The fair value of the liabilities and the debentures is determined for disclosure purposes only.

The fair value of marketable debentures is determined based on the stock market prices as at the date of the report. The fair value of the non-marketablenon‑marketable debentures is calculated based on the present value of future cash flows in respect of the principal and interest components, discounted at the market rate of interest as at the reporting date.

G.Share-based compensation

D. Share-based compensation
The fair value of employee share options and share appreciation rights is measured using the Black and Scholes model or a binomial model, in accordance with the plan (see Note 21). The model’s assumptions include the share price on the measurement date, exercise price of the instrument, expected volatility (based on the weighted-averageweighted‑average historic volatility), the weighted-averageweighted average expected life of the instruments (based on historical experience and general option-holderoption‑holder behavior), expected dividends, and the risk-free interest rate (based on government debentures).

F - 37

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018
Note 4 - Determination of Fair Values (cont'd)

E. Property, plant and equipment of the subsidiaries Dead Sea Works, Dead Sea Bromine and Dead Sea Magnesium in Israel
The fair value of property, plant and equipment, of the subsidiaries Dead Sea Works, Dead Sea Bromine and Dead Sea Magnesium (hereinafter - the Subsidiaries) was valuated based on the Replacement Cost Methodology. This evaluation was performed mainly for the Subsidiaries’ financial statements of 2016 and onward, which serve as a basis for the reports filed pursuant to the provisions of the Taxation of Natural Resources Law. For further information, see Note 20.

Note 5 - Operating Segments

A.General

1.Information on operating segments:


A. General
1. Information on operating segments:
ICL is a global enterprise, which operates mainlyspecialty minerals and chemicals company operating bromine, potash and phosphate mineral value chains in a unique, integrated business model. To align with ICL's strategy of enhancing market leadership across its three core-mineral value chains of bromine, potash and phosphate, as well as realizing the fieldsgrowth potential of fertilizers and specialty chemicals. As part of the Company's efforts to improve its business management and processes,Innovative Ag Solutions, commencing May 1, 2016,August 31, 2018, the Company operates via twofour segments: the Essential Minerals segmentIndustrial Products, Potash, Phosphate Solutions and the Specialty Solutions segment, which constitute the Company’s strategic business divisions.Innovative Ag Solutions. The comparative data has been restated in order to reflect the change in the structure of the reportable segments, as stated above.

Subsequent to the date

Industrial Products – Industrial Products segment produces bromine out of a solution that is a by‑product of the report, following recent management decision regarding the Company structure, ICL Specialty Fertilizers business line will be a partpotash production process in Sodom, Israel, as well as bromine‑based compounds. Industrial Products segment uses most of the Essential Mineralsbromine it produces for self‑production of bromine compounds at its production sites in Israel, the Netherlands and China. In addition, the segment starting from January 2017.

Essential Minerals Segment –This segment includes the ICL Potash & Magnesium,produces several grades of potash, salt, magnesium chloride and ICL Phosphate business lines.magnesia products. The segment focuses on efficiency,is also engaged in the production and marketing of phosphorous-based flame retardants and additional phosphorus‑based products.

Potash – The Potash segment uses an evaporation process innovation and operational excellence in order to improve the competitive position of its assets.

ICL Potash & Magnesium – ICL Potash & Magnesium extractsextract potash from the Dead Sea and mines and producesuses conventional mining to produce potash and salt from subterranean minesan underground mine in Spain and the UK. ICL Potash & Magnesium processes theSpain. The segment markets its potash into its types and markets itfertilizers globally and also carries on certain other intercompany operations not solely related to the potash activities. At the end of the second quarter of 2018, the Company ceased the production of potash in the ICL Boulby mine in the UK and shifted to sole production of Polysulphate™. The Polysulphate™ is produced in an underground mine at ICL Boulby in the UK, and is the basis for a significant part of the Company's FertilizerpluS product line. The segment also includes magnesium businessactivities under which it produces, markets and sells pure magnesium and magnesium alloys. Italloys, and also produces dry carnallite and related by-products, including chlorine and sylvinite.

ICL Phosphate – ICL In addition, the Potash segment sells salt that produced in its underground mines in Spain and UK.

F - 38

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018
Note 5 - Operating Segments (cont’d)

A. General (cont’d)
1. Information on operating segments: (cont'd)
Phosphate mines and processesSolutions – The Phosphate Solutions segment is based on a phosphate value chain which uses phosphate commodity products, such as phosphate rock and fertilizer-grade phosphoric acid (“green phosphoric acid”), to produce specialty products with higher added value. The segment also produces and markets phosphate-based fertilizers.
Phosphate rock is mined and processed from open pit mines, three of which are located in the Negev Desert in Israel while the fourth is situatedlocated in the Yunnan province in China. In addition, ICL Phosphate produces sulfuricSulphuric acid, agriculturalgreen phosphoric acid and phosphate fertilizers are produced in its facilities in Israel, China and Europe. Furthermore, ICL
The Phosphate manufactures phosphate-based food additives for livestock in Turkey. ICL Phosphate markets its products worldwide, mainly in Europe, Brazil, India and China.

Specialty Solutions Segment– This segment includes four business lines: ICL Industrial Products, ICL Specialty Fertilizers, ICL Advanced Additives and ICL Food Specialties. The segment concentrates on achieving growth through a highly-tailored customer focus, as well as product innovation and commercial excellence.

ICL Industrial Products – ICL Industrial Products produces bromine out of a solution that is created as a by-product of the potash production process in Sodom, Israel, as well as bromine-based compounds. ICL Industrial Products uses most of the bromine it produces for self-production of bromine compounds at production sites in Israel, the Netherlands and China. In addition, ICL Industrial Products is engaged in the production and marketing of phosphorous flame retardants and additional phosphorus-based products.


Note 5 - Operating Segments (cont’d)

A.General (cont’d)

1.Information on operating segments: (cont'd)

ICL Specialty Fertilizers – ICL Specialty Fertilizers produces specialty fertilizers in the Netherlands and Belgium (e.g., water soluble), liquid fertilizers and soluble fertilizers in Israel and Spain and controlled-release fertilizers in the Netherlands and in the United States. ICL Specialty Fertilizers markets its products worldwide, mainly in Europe, North America and Israel.

ICL Advanced Additives – ICL Advanced Additives business line primarily develops, produces, markets and sells a broad range of acids, specialty phosphates and specialty minerals for various applications in a large number of industries, including metal and water treatment, paints and coatings, forest fire retardants, cleaning materials, oral hygiene, carbonated drinks, asphalt modification, de-icing, nutrition, pharma, specialty steel, fuel additives and rubber. The diverse products and market base supports and is consistent with the Company’s strategy of increasing production of downstream products with higher added value. This business line purifies some of the agriculturalits green phosphoric acid manufactured by ICL Phosphate and also manufactures thermal phosphoric acid. The purified phosphoric acid and the thermal phosphoric acid are used to manufacture downstream products with high added value –provide solutions based on specialty phosphate salts and acids – whichfor diversified industrial end markets, such as oral care, cleaning products, paints and coatings, water treatment, asphalt modification, construction and metal treatment. The specialty phosphate salts and acids are usedmainly produced in the various industries mentioned above.Company’s facilities in US, Brazil, Germany and China. The product line of ICL’s Advanced Additives business linesegment is further comprised of processed potassium, calcium and magnesium products used in the pharma, specialty steel, oil drilling, and oil additives industries, along with de-icing and other applications.

ICL Food Specialties – ICL Food Specialties isalso a leader in developing and producing functional food ingredients and phosphate additives, which provide texture and stability solutions for the processed meat, fish,poultry, seafood, dairy, beverage and baked-goodsbaked goods markets. In addition, the segment supplies pure phosphoric acid to ICL’s specialty fertilizers business lineand produces milk and whey proteins for the food ingredients industryindustry.

Innovative Ag Solutions – The Innovative Ag Solutions segment was established on the foundations of ICL’s specialty fertilizers business. The segment aims to achieve global leadership by enhancing its global positions in its core markets of specialty agriculture, ornamental horticulture, turf and provides blended, integrated solutions based on dairy proteinslandscaping, targeting high-growth markets such as Latin America, India and China, by leveraging its unique R&D capabilities, vast agronomic experience, global footprint, backward integration to potash and phosphate additives. and chemistry know-how, as well as seeking M&A opportunities. ICL is working to expand its broad product portfolio of controlled release fertilizers (CRF), water soluble fertilizers (WSF), liquid fertilizers, slow release fertilizers (SRF) and straights (MKP/MAP/Pekacid).
The business line operates primary production locationsInnovative Ag Solutions segment develops, manufactures, markets and sells fertilizers that are based primarily on nitrogen, potash (potassium chloride) and phosphate. It produces water soluble specialty fertilizers in GermanyBelgium and Austria, which mainly process phosphates, milkthe US, liquid fertilizers and spicessoluble fertilizers in Israel and runs several local blending facilitiesSpain, and controlled‑release fertilizers in Germany, the UK,Netherlands and the United States, Brazil, ChinaStates. ICL's specialty fertilizers business markets its products worldwide, mainly in Europe, Asia, North America and Australia, enablingIsrael.
The segment will also function as ICL’s innovative arm, which will seek to focus on R&D, as well as implementing digital innovation.
Other Activities – business activities that are not reviewed regularly by the production of "customer specific" solutions that meetorganization’s chief operating decision maker.
F - 39

Notes to the requirements of the local market.

2.Segment capital investments

Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018


Note 5 - Operating Segments (cont’d)

A. General (cont’d)
2. Segment capital investments
The capital investments made by the segments, for each of the reporting periods,years, include mainly property, plant and equipment and intangible assets acquired in the ordinary course of business and as part of business combinations.

3.Inter-segment transfers and unallocated income (expenses)

3. Inter–segment transfers and unallocated income (expenses)
Segment revenues, expenses and results include inter-segment transfers, which are priced mainly based on transaction prices in the ordinary course of business.business – this being based on reports that are regularly reviewed by the chief operating decision maker. These transfers are eliminated as part of consolidation of the financial statements.
The segment incomeprofit is measured based on the operating income, without certain expenses that are not allocated to the operating segments including general and administrative expenses, as it is included in reports that are regularly reviewed by the chief operating decision maker.


F - 40

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018
Note 5 - Operating Segments (cont’d)

B. Operating segment data

B.Industrial ProductsOperating segment dataPotashPhosphate SolutionsInnovative Ag Solutions
Other
Activities
ReconciliationConsolidated
$ millions

 Specialty Solutions SegmentEssential Minerals Segment

Other

activities

EliminationsConsolidated
 $ millions
For the year ended December 31, 2016     
      
Sales to external parties 3,125 2,179 59- 5,363
Inter-segment sales

23

258

-

(281)

-

Total sales

3,148

2,437

59

(281)

5,363

      
Operating income attributed to segments

589

343

5

  937
General and administrative expenses     (321)
Other unallocated expenses and intercompany eliminations    

(619)

Operating loss     (3)
      
Financing expenses, net     (132)
Share in earnings of  equity-accounted investee    

18

Loss before taxes on income    

(117)

      
Capital expenditures 102 490 1  593
Capital expenditures not allocated    

59

Total capital expenditures    

652

      
Depreciation and amortization 123 275 3  401
Depreciation and amortization not allocated    

5

Total depreciation and amortization    

406

      

For the year ended December 31, 2018       
        
Sales to external parties 1,281 1,481 2,001 719 74- 5,556
Inter-segment sales 15 142 98 22 5 (282)-
Total sales 1,296 1,623 2,099 741 79 (282) 5,556
        
Segment profit 350 393 208 57 9 (7) 1,010
General and administrative expenses       (257)
Other income not allocated to the segments       766
Operating income       1,519
        
Financing expenses, net       (158)
Share in earnings of equity-accounted investee       3
Income before income taxes       1,364
        
Capital expenditures 50 356 180 15 1 3 605
        
Depreciation, amortization and impairment 63 141 172 19 4 21 420


F - 41

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018
Note 5 - Operating Segments (cont'd)


B. Operating segment data (cont'd)

B.Industrial ProductsOperating segment data (cont'd)PotashPhosphate SolutionsInnovative Ag Solutions
Other
Activities
ReconciliationConsolidated
$ millions

 Specialty Solutions SegmentEssential Minerals Segment

Other

activities

EliminationsConsolidated
 $ millions
For the year ended December 31, 2015     
      
Sales to external parties 2,975 2,248 182- 5,405
Inter-segment sales

22

252

3

(277)

-

Total sales

2,997

2,500

185

(277)

5,405

      
Operating income attributed to segments

514

821

16

  1,351
General and administrative expenses     (350)
Other unallocated expenses and intercompany eliminations    

(236)

Operating income     765
      
Financing expenses, net     (108)
Share in earnings of equity-accounted investee    

11

Income before taxes on income    

668

      
      
Capital expenditures 141 427 2  570
Capital expenditures as part of business combination 160 430-  590
Capital expenditures not allocated    

110

Total capital expenditures    

1,270

      
Depreciation and amortization 166 226 37  429
Depreciation and amortization not allocated    

1

Total depreciation and amortization    

430

      

For the year ended December 31, 2017       
        
Sales to external parties 1,179 1,258 1,938 671 372- 5,418
Inter-segment sales 14 125 99 21 12 (271)-
Total sales 1,193 1,383 2,037 692 384 (271) 5,418
        
Segment profit 303 282 149 56 127 (4) 913
General and administrative expenses       (261)
Other expenses not allocated to the segments       (23)
Operating income       629
        
Financing expenses, net       (124)
Income before income taxes       505
        
Capital expenditures 49 270 154 12 19 3 507
        
Depreciation, amortization and impairment 61 128 172 19 8 30 418


F - 42

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018
Note 5 - Operating Segments (cont’d)


B. Operating segment data (cont'd)

B.Industrial ProductsOperating segment data (cont'd)PotashPhosphate SolutionsInnovative Ag Solutions
Other
Activities
ReconciliationConsolidated
$ millions

 Specialty Solutions SegmentEssential Minerals Segment

Other

activities

EliminationsConsolidated
 $ millions
For the year ended December 31, 2014     
      
Sales to external parties 3,064 2,514 533- 6,111
Inter-segment sales

22

259

8

(289)

-

Total sales

3,086

2,773

541

(289)

6,111

      
Operating income attributed to segments

505

720

62

  1,287
General and administrative expenses     (306)
Other unallocated expenses and intercompany eliminations    

(223)

Operating income     758
      
Financing expenses, net     (157)
Share in earnings of equity-accounted investee    

31

Income before taxes on income    

632

      
Capital expenditures15759315 765
Capital expenditures as part of business combination164-- 164
Unallocated capital expenditures    

29

Total capital expenditures    

958

      
Depreciation and Amortization14920968 426
Unallocated depreciation and amortization    

1

Total depreciation and amortization    

427

      


For the year ended December 31, 2016       
        
Sales to external parties 1,111 1,213 2,082 632 325- 5,363
Inter-segment sales 9 125 104 29 15 (282)-
Total sales 1,120 1,338 2,186 661 340 (282) 5,363
        
Segment profit 286 282 224 55 93 (37) 903
General and administrative expenses       (321)
Other expenses not allocated to the segments       (585)
Operating loss       (3)
        
Financing expenses, net       (132)
Share in earnings of equity-accounted investees       18
Loss before income taxes       (117)
        
Capital expenditures 38 311 237 7 1 58 652
        
Depreciation, amortization and impairment 52 127 203 17 3 4 406

F - 43

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018
Note 5 - Operating Segments (cont'd)

C.Information based on geographical location

Following is data regarding


C. Information based on geographical location
The following table presents the distribution of the GroupICL's sales by geographical location of the customer:

 201620152014

$

millions

% of

sales

$

millions

% of

sales

$

millions 

% of

sales 

USA 1,07020 1,17622 1,29921
China 66913 55010 5259
Brazil 52110 5069 5168
Germany 3927 4218 5319
United Kingdom 3066 3036 3355
Spain 2585 2855 3426
Israel 2374 2404 2845
France 2264 2956 3646
India 1994 2064 2724
Australia 1873 1122 831
All other

1,298

24

1,311

24

1,560

26

Total

5,363

100

5,405

100

6,111

100

       

Following is data regarding

 201820172016
 
$
millions
% of
sales
$
millions
% of
sales
$
millions
% of
sales

USA 903 16 1,091 20 1,070 20
China 848 15 724 13 669 12
Brazil 656 12 594 11 521 10
United Kingdom 382 7 328 6 306 6
Germany 365 7 378 7 392 7
France 267 5 265 5 226 4
Spain 262 5 264 5 258 5
Israel 223 4 171 3 237 4
India 211 4 200 4 199 4
Australia 126 2 85 2 187 3
All other 1,313 23 1,318 24 1,298 25
Total 5,556 100 5,418 100 5,363 100

F - 44

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018
Note 5 - Operating Segments (cont'd)

C. Information based on geographical location (cont'd)
The following table presents the distribution of the Group'soperating segments sales by geographical location of the assets:

For the year ended December 31
 201620152014
$ millions$ millions$ millions
Israel2,4702,4272,958
Europe2,1242,2962,692
North America1,0451,1481,107
Others

774

503

407

 6,4136,3747,164
Intercompany transactions

(1,050)

(969)

(1,053)

Total

5,363

5,405

6,111

    

customer:
Industrial ProductsPotashPhosphate SolutionsInnovative Ag Solutions
Other
Activities
ReconciliationConsolidated
$ millions

For the year ended December 31, 2018       
Europe 473 459 719 362 49 (92) 1,970
Asia 399 519 481 105 2 (18) 1,488
North America 347 107 405 103 24 (8) 978
South America 21 408 264 21 1 (3) 712
Rest of the world 56 130 230 150 3 (161) 408
Total 1,296 1,623 2,099 741 79 (282) 5,556

Industrial ProductsPotashPhosphate SolutionsInnovative Ag Solutions
Other
Activities
ReconciliationConsolidated
$ millions

For the year ended December 31, 2017       
Europe 456 386 749 326 87 (86) 1,918
Asia 351 433 476 100 3 (21) 1,342
North America 327 116 369 94 282 (13) 1,175
South America 19 347 277 22 5 (4) 666
Rest of the world 40 101 166 150 7 (147) 317
Total 1,193 1,383 2,037 692 384 (271) 5,418

F - 45

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018
Note 5 - Operating Segments (cont'd)


C. Information based on geographical location (cont'd)
The following table presents the distribution of the operating segments sales by geographical location of the customer: (cont'd)
C.Industrial ProductsInformation based on geographical location (cont'd)PotashPhosphate SolutionsInnovative Ag Solutions
Other
Activities
ReconciliationConsolidated
$ millions

Following is data regarding


For the year ended December 31, 2016       
Europe 424 421 717 319 77 (95) 1,863
Asia 301 396 511 74 6 (13) 1,275
North America 330 93 380 110 250 (22) 1,141
South America 25 267 274 19 1 2 588
Rest of the world 40 161 304 139 6 (154) 496
Total 1,120 1,338 2,186 661 340 (282) 5,363


F - 46

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018
Note 5 - Operating Segments (cont'd)

C. Information based on geographical location (cont'd)
The following table presents the distribution of ICL's sales by geographical location of the assets:
 For the year ended December 31
 201820172016
 $ millions$ millions$ millions

Israel 2,841 2,548 2,470
Europe 2,198 2,119 2,124
North America 831 1,045 1,045
Asia 617 583 556
Others 211 215 218
  6,698 6,510 6,413
Intercompany sales (1,142) (1,092) (1,050)
    
Total 5,556 5,418 5,363

The following table presents operating income (loss) by geographical location of the assets from which it was produced:

 For the year ended December 31
201620152014
$ millions$ millions$ millions
Israel304386501
North America838971
Europe(117)254132
Others(244)4465
Eliminations

(29)

(8)

(11)

Total

(3)

765

758

    

Following is data regarding

 For the year ended December 31
 201820172016
 $ millions$ millions$ millions

Europe* 834 (45) (117)
Israel 526 475 304
North America 74 154 83
Asia 52 8 (41)
Others 2933 (203)
Intercompany eliminations 44 (29)
Total 1,519 629 (3)

* Europe profit for the year ended December 31, 2018 includes gain from divestiture of businesses in the amount of $841 million. For further information see Note 10.
F - 47

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018

Note 5 - Operating Segments (cont'd)

C. Information based on geographical location (cont'd)
The following table present the non-current assets by geographical location of the assets (*)

 For the year ended December 31
20162015
$ millions$ millions
Israel3,3513,376
Europe1,1271,192
Asia472534
North America382422
Other148275
Eliminations

10

10

Total

5,490

5,809

   

(*)Consist mainly from Investments in equity-accounted investees, Rights over leases, Non-current inventories, Property, plant and equipment and Intangible assets.

D.Segment Sales by Business lines

 201620152014

$

millions

% of

sales

millions 

% of

sales

$

millions

% of

sales

Specialty Solutions Segment      
Advanced Additives 96618 94517 88114
Industrial Products 95318 87116 1,02517
Specialty Fertilizers 66112 68013 75412
Food Specialties

659

12

613

11

526

9

  3,23960 3,10957 3,18652
Essential Minerals Segment      
Potash & Magnesium 1,33825 1,51528 1,90231
Phosphate

1,163

22

1,064

20

963

16

  2,50147 2,57948 2,86547
All other and setoffs

(377)

(7)

(283)

(5)

60

1

Total

5,363

100

5,405

100

6,111

100

       

 For the year ended December 31
 20182017
 $ millions$ millions

Note 5

Israel 3,570 3,387
Europe 1,228 1,227
Asia 401 455
North America 309 321
Other 59 94
Total 5,567 5,484

(*) Mainly consist of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets, non-current inventories and lease rights.
F - Operating Segments (cont'd)

E.Information on operating income by Business lines

In light of the above-mentioned structural change process implemented during 2016, which led to a new presentation format with respect to ICL’s operating segments, set forth below is additional information regarding the operating income attributable48


Notes to the segments by business line:

 201620152014
$ millions$ millions$ millions
Potash & Magnesium282637601
Phosphate60187118
Specialty Fertilizers556383
Advanced Additives194188179
Food Specialties847282
Industrial Products255191161
Other activities and setoff71363
Consolidated (business lines)9371,3511,287
    

Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018

Note 6 - Short-Term Investments and Deposits

As at December 31
 20162015
$ millions$ millions
Trading securities1026
Deposits in banks and financial institutions and short-term loans1860
Current maturities of long-term deposits11
 2987
   

Note 7 – Inventories

 As at December 31
 20162015
$ millions$ millions
Finished products773824
Work in progress267299
Raw materials and supplies194235
Spare parts and maintenance supplies129128
 1,3631,486
Less – non-current inventories (presented in non-current assets)96122
 1,2671,364
   

 As at December 31
 20182017
 $ millions$ millions

Finished products 772 709
Work in progress 258 269
Raw materials 216 212
Spare parts 143 142
Total inventories 1,389 1,332
Less – non-current inventories. mainly raw materials (presented in non-current assets) 99 106
Current inventories 1,290 1,226

Note 87 - Other Receivables

 As at December 31
 20162015
$ millions$ millions
Current tax assets6645
Prepaid expenses2531
Government institutions3965
Advances to suppliers1517
Reimbursement asset632
Assets held for sale-39
Other7162
 222291
   

 As at December 31
 20182017
 $ millions$ millions

Government institutions 108 78
Current tax assets 79 16
Prepaid expenses 52 43
Insurance receivables 1 26
Other 55 62
  295 225


F - 49

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018
Note 98 - Investments in Subsidiaries and Investee Companies

A.Acquisition of subsidiaries

Establishment of joint venture ("YPH JV")

In October 2015, the Company completed establishment of the joint venture 50%/50% (“YPH JV”) with YTH. The joint venture is controlled by ICL and has a full backward integrated phosphate business with a phosphate rock mine and other downstream operation. The net consideration

Non-controlling interests in respect of the joint venture is about $163 million.

The Company’s financial statements as at December 31, 2015 included provisional amounts in respect of YPH JV’s PPA. In October 2016, upon completion of YPH JV’s PPA, the Company obtained further clarifications relating to the quality of the out-door phosphate pile. As a result, the inventory value was retrospectively adjusted in the amount of $24 million against goodwill and non-controlling interests. The values of Inventory, goodwill and non-controlling interest, after the adjustment, are $147 million, $56 million and $130 million, respectively.

In January 2016, the Company completed its investment in 15% of the share capital of YTH, in exchange for a payment of about $250 million, based on the agreed share price of CNY 8.24, which was determined on December 2014. The share price on the closing date was CNY 9.10. The newly issued shares are subject to a three-year lock-up period as required by Chinese law. The investment is classified as an “available for sale financial asset”, and is measured at fair value, which includes a discount rate in light of the said lock-up period. In subsequent periods, updates of the fair value of the investment, other than impairment losses, will be recorded in other comprehensive income and presented in a capital reserve for financial assets “available-for-sale”.

Measurement of the fair value of the discount rate in respect of the lock-up period was calculated by use of the Finnerty 2012 Model and was 15.7% as at January 31, 2016. In accordance with the Model, the discount rate was measured based on an estimate of the period in which the restriction on marketability applies and a standard deviation of the yield on an YTH share in this period. The impact stemming from a possible and reasonable change in these data items, which are not observed, is not material. As at December 31, 2016, the total net impact on the other comprehensive income amounted to $12 million.

subsidiaries

Note 9 - Investments in Subsidiaries and Investee Companies (cont'd)

B.Movement during the year in investments in equity-accounted investees

$ millions
Balance as at January 1, 2016159
Changes during the year:
Share in earnings18
Dividends received(12)
Increased Investment4
Capital reserves(15)
Translation differences(1)
Balance as at December 31, 2016153

C.Condensed data with respect to equity-accounted investees

Set forth below is condensed financial data with respect to equity-accounted investees which are individually insignificant without adjustments for the ownership rates held by the Group.

 As at December 31
 20162015
$ millions$ millions
Current assets260301
Non-Current assets568565
Total assets828866
Current liabilities131141
Non-current liabilities406411
Total liabilities537552
Revenues315312
Expenses279303
Profit369
   

Note 9 - Investments in Subsidiaries and Investee Companies (cont'd)

D.Non-controlling interests in subsidiaries

The following table presentstables present information with respect to non-controlling interests in a Group subsidiary, YPH JV in(at the rate of 50%.), before elimination of inter-company transactions. The information includes fair value adjustments that were made on the acquisition date, other than goodwill.

2016
$ millions
Current assets227
Intangibles assets64
Other non current assets314
Current liabilities268
Long term liabilities197
Equity140
sales377
Operations Loss78
Depreciation and amortization34
Operations loss before depreciation and amortization44
Net loss104
Comprehensive loss126

Due to YPH JV’s current operating losses,goodwill and presented without adjustments for the Company has taken a number of actions, including execution of an efficiency plan, as part of which 270 YPH JV’s employees were entered to an early retirement in 2016. The Company believes thatownership rates held by the above-mentioned steps are capable of bringing YPH JV to an operating profit. Should these actions not succeed, the Company may reconsider its course of action.

Group.
 20182017
 $ millions$ millions

   
Current assets 192 197
Non-current assets 318 367
Current liabilities 225 241
Non-current liabilities 49 215
Equity 236 108

 201820172016
 $ millions$ millions$ millions

    
Sales 387 363 377
Operating loss- (21) (78)
Depreciation and amortization 34 34 34
Operating income (loss) before depreciation and amortization 34 13 (44)
Net loss (13) (38) (104)
Comprehensive income (loss) 3 (26) (126)

Note 109 – Other non-current assets

 As at December 31
 20162015
$ millions$ millions
Lease rights107122
Non-current inventories96122
Surplus in defined benefit plan7889
Other114
 292337
   

 As at December 31
 20182017
 $ millions$ millions

Lease rights 102 106
Non-current inventories 99 106
Surplus in defined benefit plan 73 89
Long-term loan 59-
Derivatives 15 64
Other 9 8
  357 373


F - 50

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018
Note 10 - Business Divestiture
Pursuant to the Company’s strategy to focus its operation on the mineral’s chains, divest low synergies businesses, reduce debt ratios and generate funds for growth initiatives, during 2018, the Company completed the following divestitures:
1)
In December 2017, the Company entered into an agreement to sell its fire safety and oil additives business to SK Invictus Holding L.P., an affiliate of SK Capital (hereinafter – the Buyer). In March 2018, the Company completed the sale transaction for a consideration of $1,010 million, of which $953 million in cash and $57 million in the form of a long-term loan to a subsidiary of the Buyer. As a result, the Company recorded, in the financial statements of 2018, a capital gain of $841 million (net of transaction expenses), under "other income" in the statement of income. the table below presents the book value of the sold assets and liabilities.
2018
$ millions
Cash and cash equivalents 1
Trade and other receivables 34
Inventories 59
Property, plant and equipment 26
Intangible assets 64
Trade payables and other current liabilities (28)
Deferred tax liabilities (3)
Net assets and liabilities 153
Consideration received in cash (*) 938
Income tax paid (35)
Cash disposed of (1)
Net cash inflow 902
* The consideration received in cash is net of $16 million transaction expenses.
2)In June 2018, the Company entered into an agreement for the sale of the assets and business of its subsidiary, Rovita, for no consideration (hereinafter – the Agreement). Rovita produces commodity milk protein products, using by-products from the whey protein business of Prolactal, which is part of the Phosphate Solutions segment. In July 2018, the company completed the sales transaction and as a result, recognized a loss deriving from the write-off of all Rovita’s assets, in the amount of $16 million ($12 million after tax), under “other expenses” in the statement of income.
F - 51

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018

Note 11 - Property, Plant and Equipment

 Land, land development, roads and buildingsInstallations, machinery and equipmentDikes and evaporating pondsHeavy mechanical equipment, railroad cars and tanksFurniture, office equipment, vehicles, equipment and otherPlants under construction and spare parts for installations (1)Total
 $ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions
        
Cost       
Balance as at January 1, 20167605,0381,6341572359768,800
Additions2448889219(83)539
Disposals(4)(49)-(10)(10)-(73)
Translation differences(17)(72)(8)-(2)(14)(113)
Reclassification from assets held for sale-3--2-5
Balance as at December 31, 20167635,4081,7151492448799,158
Accumulated depreciation       
Balance as at January 1, 20163963,08584884175-4,588
Additions22218102815-365
Disposals(2)(41)-(9)(8)-(60)
Impairment-5----5
Translation differences(7)(35)(6)-(1)-(49)
Balance as at December 31, 20164093,23294483181-4,849
Depreciated balance as at December 31, 20163542,17677166638794,309
        


Land, roads and buildingsInstallations and equipmentDikes and evaporating pondsHeavy mechanical equipmentFurniture, vehicles and equipmentPlants under construction and spare parts for installations (1)The additions for the year are presented net of items the construction of which were completed and accordingly were recorded in other categories in the “property, plant and equipment” section.Total
$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions

        
Cost       
Balance as at January 1, 2018 844 5,788 1,888 150 242 898 9,810
Additions 42 789 100 5 20 (367) 589
Disposals (2) (19)- (2) (7)- (30)
Translation differences (23) (76) (13)- (4) (16) (132)
Balance as at December 31, 2018 861 6,482 1,975 153 251 515 10,237
Accumulated depreciation       
Balance as at January 1, 2018 451 3,520 1,053 84 181- 5,289
Depreciation for the year 24 234 96 7 12- 373
Impairment 5 5-- 1- 11
Disposals (1) (16)- (2) (8)- (27)
Translation differences (11) (50) (10)- (1)- (72)
Balance as at December 31, 2018 468 3,693 1,139 89 185- 5,574
Depreciated balance as at December 31, 2018 393 2,789 836 64 66 515 4,663

(1) The additions for the year are presented net of items the construction of which were completed and accordingly were recorded in other categories in the “property, plant and equipment” section.
F - 52

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018
Note 11 - Property, Plant and Equipment (cont’d)

 Land, land development, roads and buildingsInstallations, machinery and equipmentDikes and evaporating pondsHeavy mechanical equipment, railroad cars and tanksFurniture, office equipment, vehicles, equipment and otherPlants under construction and spare parts for installations (1)Total
 $ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions
        
Cost       
Balance as at January 1, 20157154,9151,5281572409038,458
Additions4525814081874543
Additions in respect of business combinations551506-624241
Disposals(2)(70)(16)(7)(5)-(100)
Translation differences(33)(103)(24)(1)(5)(25)(191)
Classification to assets held for sale(20)(112)--(19)-(151)
        
Balance as at December 31, 20157605,0381,6341572359768,800
        
Accumulated depreciation       
Balance as at January 1, 20153653,10479183188-4,531
Additions3018090811-319
Disposals(2)(55)(16)(6)(5)-(84)
Impairment3738----75
Translation differences(14)(77)(17)(1)(2)-(111)
Classification to assets held for sale(20)(105)--(17)-(142)
        
Balance as at December 31, 2015

396

3,085

848

84

175

-

4,588

        
Depreciated balance as at December 31, 20153641,95378673609764,212
        


Land, roads and buildingsInstallations and equipmentDikes and evaporating pondsHeavy mechanical equipmentFurniture, vehicles and equipmentPlants under construction and spare parts for installations (1)The additions for the year are presented net of items the construction of which were completed and accordingly were recorded in other categories in the “property, plant and equipment” section.Total
$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions

        
Cost       
Balance as at January 1, 2017 763 5,408 1,715 149 244 879 9,158
Additions 42 302 140 7 13 (14) 490
Disposals (6) (28)- (12) (17)- (63)
Translation differences 49 136 33 7 9 35 269
Reclassification to assets held for sale (4) (30)- (1) (7) (2) (44)
Balance as at December 31, 2017 844 5,788 1,888 150 242 898 9,810
Accumulated depreciation       
Balance as at January 1, 2017 409 3,232 944 83 181- 4,849
Depreciation for the year 23 227 84 7 14- 355
Impairment- 13---- 13
Disposals (4) (23)- (12) (17)- (56)
Translation differences 24 85 25 7 6- 147
Reclassification to assets held for sale (1) (14)- (1) (3)- (19)
Balance as at December 31, 2017 451 3,520 1,053 84 181- 5,289
Depreciated balance as at December 31, 2017 393 2,268 835 66 61 898 4,521

(1) The additions for the year are presented net of items the construction of which were completed and accordingly were recorded in other categories in the “property, plant and equipment” section.
F - 53

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018

Note 12 - Intangible Assets


A.Composition

 Intangible assets acquiredIntangible assets
internally developed
Computer 
application
OthersTotal
 GoodwillConcessions and mining rightsTrademarksTechnology / patentsCustomer relationshipsExploration and evaluation assetsDevelopment costs   
 $ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions
Cost          
Balance as at January 1, 201637026286822121436255721,488
Additions-111619-59-87
Additions in respect of business combinations from prior year26--------26
Disposals-(52)---(126)-(249)-(427)
Translation differences2(6)(1)(3)(5)(1)-(3)(2)(19)
Reclassification from assets held for sale----1--3-4
           
Balance as at December 31, 2016398205868021435665701,159
           
 Amortization and impairment losses          
Balance as at January 1, 20162152163077755540303
Amortization for the year-535132-3536
Disposals-------(2)-(2)
Translation differences---(1)(2)--(1)-(4)
Reclassification from assets held for sale-------2-2
           
Balance as at December 31, 20162157193488955745335
           
Amortized Balance as at December 31 ,20163771486746126261825824
           


GoodwillConcessions and mining rightsTrademarksTechnology / patentsCustomer relationshipsExploration and evaluation assets
Computer
application
OthersTotal
$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions

Cost         
Balance as at January 1, 2018 348 216 91 80 183 39 76 34 1,067
Additions--- 1- 1 13 1 16
Disposals------- (2) (2)
Translation differences (17) (6) (3) (6) (5) (1) (2)- (40)
          
Balance as at December 31, 2018 331 210 88 75 178 39 87 33 1,041
          
 Amortization and impairment losses         
Balance as at January 1, 2018 22 63 24 35 94 25 61 21 345
Amortization for the year- 5 3 5 10 1 4 2 30
Impairment--- 3 3--- 6
Disposals------- (1) (1)
Translation differences-- (1) (4) (2) (1) (2)- (10)
          
Balance as at December 31, 2018 22 68 26 39 105 25 63 22 370
          
Amortized Balance as at December 31 ,2018 309 142 62 36 73 14 24 11 671


F - 54

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018
Note 12 - Intangible Assets (cont'd)


A.Composition (cont’d)

 Intangible assets acquiredIntangible assets
internally developed
Computer
application
OthersTotal
 GoodwillConcessions and mining rightsTrademarksTechnology / patentsCustomer relationshipsExploration and evaluation assetsDevelopment costs   
 $ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions
Cost          
Balance as at January 1, 20153271548970196257155641,087
Additions---4-20-1076137
Additions in respect of business combinations901164152497--3349
Translation differences(47)(8)(7)(7)(8)1(1)(3)(1)(81)
Classification from assets held for sale-------(4)-(4)
           
Balance as at December 31, 201537026286822121436255721,488
           
 Amortization and impairment losses          
Balance as at January 1, 20152448142767665834284
Amortization for the year-445121-4636
Translation differences(3)-(2)(2)(2)-(1)(3)-(13)
Classification from assets held for sale-------(4)-(4)
           
Balance as at December 31, 20152152163077755540303
           
Amortized Balance as at December 31 ,201534921070521351361200321,185
           


GoodwillConcessions and mining rightsTrademarksTechnology / patentsCustomer relationshipsExploration and evaluation assets
Computer
application
OthersTotal
$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions

Cost         
Balance as at January 1, 2017 398 205 86 80 214 35 65 76 1,159
Additions--- 3- 1 10 3 17
Discontinuance of consolidation (55)------- (55)
Translation differences 16 11 7 7 16 3 2 1 63
Reclassification to assets held for sale (11)- (2) (10) (47)- (1) (46) (117)
          
Balance as at December 31, 2017 348 216 91 80 183 39 76 34 1,067
          
Amortization and impairment losses         
Balance as at January 1, 2017 21 57 19 34 88 9 57 50 335
Amortization for the year- 6 3 5 12 1 3 5 35
Impairment-- 1-- 14-- 15
Translation differences 1- 1 3 5 1 2 1 14
Reclassification to assets held for sale--- (7) (11)- (1) (35) (54)
        - 
Balance as at December 31, 2017 22 63 24 35 94 25 61 21 345
          
Amortized Balance as at December 31 ,2017 326 153 67 45 89 14 15 13 722


F - 55

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018
Note 12 - Intangible Assets (cont'd)

B.Total book value of intangible assets having defined useful lives and those having indefinite useful lives are as follows:

 As at December 31
 20162015
 $ millions$ millions
Intangible assets having a defined useful life415803
Intangible assets having an indefinite useful life.409382
 8241,185
   

B. Total book value of intangible assets having defined useful lives and those having indefinite useful lives are as follows:

 As at December 31
 20182017
 $ millions$ millions

Intangible assets having a defined useful life 332 365
Intangible assets having an indefinite useful life 339 357
  671 722

Note 13 - Impairment Testing

A.Impairment testing for intangible assets with an indefinite useful life


Impairment testing for intangible assets with an indefinite useful life
Goodwill

- The goodwill is not monitored for internal reporting purposes and, accordingly, it is allocated to the Company’s operating segments and not to the cash-producingcash-generating units, the level of which is lower than the operating segment. In lightThe examination of impairment in the carrying amount of the structural and administrative changes, during 2016 the Company commenced operating in two reportable segments – “Essential Minerals” and “Specialty Solutions”. Accordingly, the goodwill has been allocated to the new operating segments. The comparative data has been restated in order to reflect the structural change, as stated above.

Other intangible assets with an indefinite useful life (trademarks)

is made accordingly.

Trademarks - For the purpose of impairment testing other intangible assetspurpose, the trademarks with an indefinite useful life were allocated to the cash-generating units, which represent the lowest level within the Company.


Note 13 - Impairment Testing (cont’d)

A.Impairment testing for intangible assets with an indefinite useful life (cont’d)

The carrying amounts of intangible assets with an indefinite useful life are as follows:

 As at December 31
 20162015
 $ millions$ millions
Goodwill  
Specialty Solutions segment279279
Essential Minerals segment9870
 377349
   
Trademarks  
Industrial Products, United States1313
Advanced Additives, United States99
Food, United States55
Industrial Products, Europe56
 3233
 409382
   

Further

 As at December 31
 20182017
 $ millions$ millions

Goodwill  
Phosphate Solutions 127 140
Industrial Products 92 93
Innovative Ag. Solutions 71 73
Potash 19 20
  309 326
   
Trademarks  
Industrial Products, United States 13 13
Phosphate Solutions, United States 12 12
Industrial Products, Europe 5 6
  3031
  339 357


F - 56

Notes to that stated above in connectionthe Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018

Note 13 - Impairment Testing (cont’d)

Impairment testing for intangible assets with an indefinite useful life (cont’d)
As a result of a structural change, which entered into effect on August 31, 2018, (see Note 5) the structuralCompany is operating through four business segments and management change that took place in 2016, along withconsequently, goodwill has been reallocated to the manner of analyzing impairmentnew segments. The comparative Goodwill amounts have been restated to reflect this change.
In preparation of the value goodwill impairment testing, the after-taxafter‑tax discount rate used infor the calculation of the recoverable amount of the operating segments is 7% (real) - 9% (nominal).9.5% nominal. The long-termlong‑term growth rate is between 0% and 2%, in accordance with the various industries and markets in which the Company’s activity segments areCompany is engaged.

The recoverable amount of the operating segments was determined based on their value in use, which is an internal valuation of the discounted future cash flows that will be generated from the continuing operation of the operating segments. As a result of theThe examinations made, it was determined that the carrying amount of the operating segments is lower than their recoverable amount and, accordingly, no impairment loss was recognized.

B.Impairment losses

1.In August 2016, the Ethiopian Tax Authority decided to reject the appeal filed by the subsidiary Allana Afar (hereinafter – “Allana”) regarding the tax assessment from June 2016, in the amount of $55 million. Allana contends the tax assessment is illegal and unjustified, and therefore declined to pay it, an action that triggers imposition of sanctions according to Ethiopian law, including, foreclosure of property and revocation of the mining concession. In light of that stated above and in view of the Ethiopian government’s failure to provide the necessary infrastructures and regulatory framework for the project, in October 2016, the Company’s Board of Directors instructed Management to take all necessary actions towards termination of the project. As a result, in the financial statements for 2016, the Company made a re-evaluation of the value of the assets and liabilities in Allana’s books, which resulted in the recording of a write-down, in the amount of $156 million (including $36 million deferred tax liabilities), an increase in the tax provision, in the amount of $32 million, and a provision for the estimated shutdown costs, in the amount of $10 million. The total impact on the Company’s net income is $198 million.


Note 13 - Impairment Testing (cont’d)

B.Impairment losses (cont’d)

2.In September 2016, the Company’s Board of Directors decided to discontinue the Harmonization Project for developing and establishing a central global ERP system. The Board’s decision was made primarily in light of substantial risks relating to the readiness of the Project’s system and its future cost. Recently, management identified substantial risks relating to the suitability, complexity and readiness of the system which significantly impacted the Project’s budget and timeline. In light of that stated above, the Company examined the Project’s total costs and as a result, in the financial statements for 2016, the Company recorded a write-down in the amount of $249 million, and a provision for the estimated shutdown costs, in the amount of $33 million, which were recorded in the “other expenses” category in the statement of income. The total impact on the Company’s after-tax income is $239 million.


Note 14 - Derivative Instruments

 As at December 31, 2016As at December 31, 2015
 AssetsLiabilitiesAssetsLiabilities
 $ millions$ millions
     
Included in current assets and liabilities:    
Foreign currency and interest derivative instruments 8(3)9(7)
Derivative instruments on energy and marine transport4--(10)
     
 12(3)9(17)
     
Included in non-current assets and liabilities:    
Foreign currency and interest derivative instruments3(5)-(13)
     
     


As at December 31, 2018As at December 31, 2017
AssetsLiabilitiesAssetsLiabilities
$ millions$ millions
     
Included in current assets and liabilities:    
Foreign currency and interest derivative instruments 13 (16) 1 (3)
Derivative instruments on energy and marine transport- (5) 4-
     
  13 (21) 5 (3)
     
Included in non-current assets and liabilities:    
Foreign currency and interest derivative instruments 15- 64 (3)

F - 57

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018

Note 15 - Credit from Banks and Others

A.Composition

 As at December 31
 20162015
 $ millions$ millions
Short-term credit  
   
From financial institutions572443
Other liabilities

-

217

 

572

660

Current maturities  
Long term loans from financial institutions

16

13

   
Total Short Term Credit588673
   
Long- term debt and debentures  
Loans from financial institutions1,2541,748
Other loans

87

5

 1,3411,753
 Less – current maturities

16

13

 1,3251,740
   
Marketable debentures1,196790
Non-marketable debentures

275

275

   
Total Long- term debt and debentures2,7962,805
   

*For additional information, see Note 23 Financial Instruments and Risk Management.


 As at December 31
 20182017
 $ millions$ millions

Short-term credit  
     
From financial institutions 544 635
From the parent company- 175
  544 810
Current maturities  
Long-term loans from financial institutions 32 12
Long-term loans from others 34-
Total Short-Term Credit 610 822
   
Long- term debt and debentures  
Loans from financial institutions 377 786
Other loans 35 98
  412 884
 Less – current maturities 66 12
  346 872
   
Marketable debentures 1,195 1,241
Non-marketable debentures 274 275
   
Total Long- term debt and debentures 1,815 2,388

For additional information, see Note 23.
B. Yearly movement in Credit from Banks and Others*
 As at December 31
 20182017
 $ millions$ millions

Balance as at January 1 3,227 3,399
   
Changes from financing cash flows  
Receipt of long-term debt 1,746 966
Repayment of long-term debt (2,115) (1,387)
Repayment of short-term credit, net of receipt (283) 147
Interest paid (103) (111)
Total net financing cash flows (755) (385)
   
Effect of changes in foreign exchange rates (63) 101
Other changes 33 112
   
Balance as at December 31 2,442 3,227
(*) Short term credit, loans and debentures, including interest payables.
F - 58

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018

Note 15 - Credit from Banks and Others (cont’d)

B.Maturity periods

The


C. Maturity periods
Following are the future maturity periods of the credit and the loans from banks and others, including debentures (net of current maturities), mature in:
 As at December 31
 20182017
 $ millions$ millions

   
Second year 17 261
Third year 273 18
Fourth year 113 213
Fifth year 308 644
Sixth year and thereafter 1,104 1,252
  1,815 2,388

For additional information, see Note 15F below.
D. Restrictions on the years afterGroup relating to the datereceipt of the report, as follows:

 As at December 31
 20162015
 $ millions$ millions
   
Second year1613
Third year32313
Fourth year27235
Fifth year1,0461,347
Sixth year and thereafter1,3841,197
 2,7962,805
   

(*)For additional information, see Note 15E below.

C.Restrictions on the Group relating to the receipt of credit

credit

As part of the loan agreements the Group has signed, various restrictions were setapply including financial covenants, a cross-defaultcross‑default mechanism and a negative pledge.

Set forth below is information regarding the financial covenants applicable to the Company as part of the loan agreements and the compliance therewith:

 Financial Ratio Required under the AgreementFinancial Ratio December 31,Financial Ratio December 31,
Financial Covenants (1) 20162015
    
EquityEquity greater than 2,000 2,5743,028
 million dollarsmillion dollarsmillion dollars
    
The ratio of the EBITDA to the net interest expensesEqual to or greater than 3.5 9.5520.31
    
Ratio of the net financial debt to EBITDALess than 3.5 2.792.16
    
Ratio of the financial liabilities of the subsidiaries to the total assets of the consolidated companyLess than 10%2.92%3.75%
    

Financial Covenants (1)Financial Ratio Required under the AgreementFinancial Ratio December 31,
2018
Total shareholder's equityEquity greater than 2,000 million dollars3,781 million dollars
The Ratio of the EBITDA to the net interest expensesEqual to or greater than 3.511.17
Ratio of the net financial debt to EBITDA (2)Less than 4.01.62
Ratio of certain subsidiaries loans to the total assets of the consolidated companyLess than 10%1.87%

(1)Examination of compliance with the above-mentionedabove‑mentioned financial covenants is made as required based on the data in the Company's consolidated financial statements. As at December 31, 2018, the Company complies with its financial covenants.

(2)
According to the Company’s covenants, the required ratio of the net financial debt to EBITDA as of January 1, 2019 will be reduced to 3.5.
F - 59

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018
Note 15 - Credit from Banks and Others (cont'd)

D.Sale of receivables under securitization transaction


E. Sale of receivables under securitization transaction
In July 2015, the Company and certain Group subsidiaries (hereinafter – “the Subsidiaries”)the Subsidiaries) signed a series of agreements regarding a securitization transaction with three international banks (hereinafter – “thethe Lending Banks”)Banks) for the sale of their customertrade receivables to a foreign company which was established specifically for this purpose and which is not owned by the ICL Group (hereinafter – “thethe Acquiring Company”)Company).

Those agreements replace the prior securitization agreements in the amount of $350 million, which came to an end in July 2015. The main structure of the new securitization agreement is the same as the prior securitization agreement. The Company's policy is to utilize the securitization limit based on its cash-flowcash flow needs, alternative financing sources and market conditions. The new securitization agreement will expire in July 2020. InUnder the agreement,agreements, ICL undertook to comply with a financial covenant whereby the ratio of net debt to EBITDA will not exceed 4.75. If ICL does not complymeet with the saidthis ratio, the Acquiring Company is allowed tocan discontinue acquiring new trade receivables (without affecting the existing acquisitions). As at the reporting date of the report, ICL is in compliance withmeet the aforementionedabove financial covenant.

The Acquiring Company finances acquisition of the debts by means of a loan received from a financial institution, which is not related to ICL which finances. As at December 31, 2018, the loan outamount of the proceeds from the issuance of commercial paper on the U.S. commercial paper market. The repayment of both the commercial paper and the loan are backed by credit lines from the Lending Banks. The amount of cash that will be received in respect of the sale of the customer debts in the securitization transaction will be up to $405framework is $350 million.

The acquisitions are on an ongoing basis, such that the proceeds received from customers whose debts were sold are used to acquire new trade receivables.

The period in which the Subsidiaries are entitled to sell their trade receivables to the Acquiring Company is five years from the closing date of the transaction, where both parties have the option at the end of each year to give notice of cancellation of the transaction. Once the Company transferred its trade receivables, it no longer has the right to sell them to another party. The selling price of the trade receivables is the amount of the debt sold, less the calculated interest cost based on the anticipated period between the sale date of the customer debt and its repayment date. Upon acquisition of the debt, the Acquiring Company pays the majoritymost of the debt price in cash and the remainder in a subordinated note, which is paid after collection of the debt sold. The rate of the cash consideration varies according to the composition and behavior of the customer portfolio. The Subsidiaries handle collection of the trade receivables included in the securitization transaction, on behalf of the Acquiring Company.

In the case of a credit default, the Company bears approximately 30% of the overall secured trade receivable balance.

In addition, as part of the agreements a number ofseveral conditions were set in connection with the quality of the customer portfolios, which give the Lending Banks the option to end the undertaking or determine that some of the Subsidiaries, the customer portfolios of which do not meet the conditions provided, will no longer be included in the securitization agreements.


F - 60

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018
Note 15 - Credit from Banks and Others (cont'd)

D.Sale of receivables under securitization transaction (cont’d)

The


E. Sale of receivables under securitization transaction (cont’d)
Based on the above terms, the securitization of trade receivables does not meet the conditions for derecognition of financial assets prescribed in International Standard IAS 39,IFRS 9, regarding Financial Instruments – Recognition and Measurement, since the Group did not transfer all of the risks and rewards deriving from the trade receivables. Therefore, the receipts received from the Acquiring Company are presented as a financial liability as part of the short-term credit. As of December 31, 2016,2018, utilization of the securitization facility and trade receivables within this framework amounted to approximately$ 332 million (December 31, 2017 - $331 million (as at December 31, 2015, approximately $285 million).

Once the Company transferred its trade receivables, it no longer has the right to sell them to another party. In the case of a credit default, the Company bears 30% of the overall secured trade receivable balance.

The value of the transferred assets (which is approximately their fair value), fair value of the associated liabilities and net position are as follows:

 Year ended December 31,
 201620152014
 $ millions$ millions$ millions
Value of the transferred assets331285290
Fair value of the associated liabilities331285290
Net position *---
    

*Less than $1 million.
 Year ended December 31,
 201820172016
 $ millions$ millions$ millions

Carrying amount of the transferred assets 332 331 331
Fair value of the associated liabilities 332 331 331
Net position *---

 * Less than $1 million.
F - 61

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018
Note 15 - Credit from Banks and Others (cont'd)

E.Information on material loans and debentures:

Instrument TypeLoan dateOriginal Principal (millions)Currency

Carrying amount

31 December, 2016

$ millions

Interest ratePrincipal Repayment dateAdditional information
Loan-European BankDecember 2010100Euro-1.105%December 2015Repaid

Loan-Israeli institutions

 

November 2013600NIS1444.94%

2015-2024

(annual repayment)

 
Debentures-Series DDecember 2014800USD791

4.5%

(Effective rate 4.59%)

December 2024

 

(1)
Loan from a European BankDecember 2015129USD129Libor+1.4%December 2019 
Debentures-Series E

April

2016

1,569NIS405

2.45%

(Effective rate 2.61%)

2021- 2024

(annual repayment)

(2)
Debenture (Privet issuance in USA)

March

2005

125USD-5.72%March 2015Repaid
Debentures (private offering) – 3 seriesJanuary 201484USD844.55%January 2021 
1451455.16%January 2024
46465.31%January 2026
Loan-international institutions

July

2014

35USD45Libor+1.55%2019-2024 
103.34%
30Euro60Euribor+1.4%-1.7%
272.1%-3.75%
YPH JV’s loansOctober 2014600CNY865.23%During 2019 
YPH JV’s bank loansOctober 2014700CNY1014.35%-4.57%During 2017 
Loan-European BankDecember 2014161BRL45CDI+1.35%

2015-2021

(2 yearly payments)

 
Loan-Asian bankApril 2016400CNY58CNH Hibor + 0.5%April 2017 

F. Information on material loans and debentures outstanding as at December 31, 2018:

Instrument typeLoan dateOriginal principal (millions)Currency
Carrying amount
($ millions)
Interest ratePrincipal repayment dateAdditional information
Loan-Israeli institutionsNovember 2013300Israeli Shekel674.74% (1)
2015-2024
(annual installment)
Partially prepaid
Debentures (private offering) – 3 seriesJanuary 2014
84
145
46
U.S Dollar
84
144
46
4.55%
5.16%
5.31%
January 2021
January 2024
January 2026
 
Loan-international institutionsJuly 201427Euro252.33%2019-2024Partially prepaid
Debentures - Series DDecember 2014800U.S Dollar1824.50%December 2024(2)
Loan - European BankDecember 2014161Brazilian Real19CDI+1.35%
2015-2021
(Semiannual installment)
 
Debentures - Series EApril 20161,569Israeli Shekel4162.45%
2021- 2024
(annual installment)
 
Loan - othersApril - October, 2016600Chinese Yuan Renminbi295.23%2019(3)
Loan - Asian BanksJune - October, 2018600Chinese Yuan Renminbi874.79% - 5.44%2019 
Loan - Asian BankApril 2018400Chinese Yuan Renminbi58CNH Hibor + 0.50%2019 
Debentures - Series FMay 2018600U.S Dollar5966.38%May 2038(4)
Loan - European BankDecember 201870U.S Dollar70Libor + 0.66%December 2021 
F - 62

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018
Note 15 - Credit from Banks and Others (cont'd)


F. Information on material loans and debentures: (cont’d)
Additional Information:
E.(1)Information on material loans and debentures: (cont’d)From April 2018, in accordance with the loan agreement, there has been a decrease in the interest rate, from 4.94% to 4.74%.

Additional Information:

(1)(2)Debentures seriesSeries D

Private issuance of debentures pursuant to Rule 144A and Regulation S under the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended, to institutional investors in the U.S., Europe, and Israel. The notes are registered for trade in the TACT Institutional; by the Tel-Aviv Stock Exchange Ltd. The notes have been rated BBB (stable). In March 2016,2017, the rating company “Fitch Rating Ltd.” updated the rating outlook of the Company’s credit, together with the rating of the debentures, from stable to negative. In October 2016, the rating company “Standard & Poor’s” updatedlowered the Company’s credit rating, together with the rating of the debentures, from BBB to BBB- with a stable rating outlook. In November 2017, the rating company “Standard & Poor’s” reaffirmed the Company’s credit rating, together with the rating of BBB to a rating ofthe debentures, at BBB-, with a stable rating outlook.

(2)Debentures-Series E

The debentures were listed On May 29, 2018, the Company completed a cash tender offer for trading onits Series D debentures. Following the Tel-Aviv Stock Exchange. The Debentures are unsecured and contain standard terms and conditions and eventstender offer, the Company repurchased an amount of default, as well as a mechanism to raise the interest rate in the event of a decrease in the rating$616 million out of the Debentures (the interest rate will be increased by 0.25% per decrease inoriginal principal amount of $800 million.

On May 10, 2018 and on June 21, 2018, respectively, the rating by one rating level, starting at a rating of (ilA) and reaching a maximum cumulative interest rate increase of 1% upon reaching a rating of (ilBBB)), a negative pledge undertaking and financial covenants ((1) minimum equity of not less than $1.55 billion; and (2) net debt to EBITDA ratio of not more than 1:5.5). On November 8, 2016, thecredit rating agency Standard & Poor'sS&P ratified the Company’s international credit rating, BBB- with a stable rating outlook, and credit rating agency Maalot ratified the Company’s credit rating, ‘ilAA’ with a stable rating outlook.
(3)Loans from others
In July 2018, ICL and YTH agreed to convert their owner’s loans in the YPH joint venture (each company holds 50%) in the amount of 'ilAA'.$146 million into equity by issuing shares. As a result, the consolidated debt was reduced by $73 million against “non‑controlling interest” equity balance.
(4)Debentures-Series F
On May 31, 2018, the Company completed a private offering of senior unsecured notes to institutional investors pursuant to Rule 144A and Regulation S under the U.S. Securities Act of 1933. According to the terms of the Series F Debentures, the Company is required to comply with certain covenants, including restrictions on sale and lease-back transactions, limitations on liens, and standard restrictions on merger and/or transfer of assets. The Company is also required to offer to repurchase the Series F Debentures upon the occurrence of a "change of control" event, as defined in the indenture for the Series F Debentures. In addition, the terms of the Series F Debentures include customary events of default, including a cross‑acceleration to other material indebtedness. The Company is entitled to optionally repay the outstanding Series F Debentures at any time prior to the final repayment date, under certain terms, subject to payment of an agreed early repayment premium. The Series F Debentures have been rated BBB- by S&P Global Inc. and Fitch Rating Inc. with a stable rating outlook is stable.

outlook.

F - 63

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018
Note 15 - Credit from Banks and Others (cont'd)


G. Credit facilities:

IssuerEuropean bank (1)Group of twelve international banks (2)European bank (3)
Date of the credit facilityMarch 2014March 2015December 2016
Date of credit facility terminationMarch 2019March 2023May 2025
The amount of the credit facility
USD 35 million
Euro 100 million
USD 1,200 millionUSD 100 million
Credit facility has been utilizedEuro 40 millionUSD 200 millionUSD 70 million
Interest rate
Up to 33% use of the credit: Libor/Euribor + 0.90%.
From 33% to 66% use of the credit: Libor/Euribor + 1.15%
66% or more use of the credit: Libor/Euribor + 1.40%
Up to 33% use of the credit: Libor/Euribor + 0.70%.
From 33% to 66% use of the credit: Libor/Euribor + 0.80%
66% or more use of the credit: Libor/Euribor + 0.95%
Libor + 0.45% + spread
Loan currency typeUSD and Euro loansUSD and Euro loansUSD loans
Pledges and restrictionsFinancial covenants - see Section D, a cross-default mechanism and a negative pledge.Financial covenants - see Section D, a cross-default mechanism and a negative pledge.Financial covenants - see Section D and a negative pledge.
Non-utilization fee0.32%0.21%0.30%
F.(1)Credit facilities:After the date of the report, the Company elected not to realize the option of revolving credit facility extension, and to repay the utilized credit facility on the date of its termination.

IssuerEuropean bankGroup of eleven international banksAmerican bankEuropean Bank

Date of the credit facility

 

March 2014

 

March 2015

 

March 2016

 

December 2016

 

Date of credit facility termination

 

March 2020

March 2021

 

March 2021June 2023

The amount of the credit facility

 

USD 35 million,
Euro 100 million
USD 1,705 millionUSD 150 millionUSD 136 million

Credit facility has been utilized

 

- USD 750 million
 Euro 83 million
--
Interest rate

Libor/Euribor plus margin 0.9%-1.4%

 

Up to 33% use of the credit: Libor/Euribor + 0.7%.
From 33% to 66% use of the credit: Libor/Euribor + 0.8%
66% or more use of the credit: Libor/Euribor + 0.95%

 

Up to 33% use of the credit: Libor + 0.65%.
From 33% to 66% use of the credit: Libor + 0.75%
66% or more use of the credit: Libor + 0.95%
Libor +0.75%
Loan Type

USD loans and Euro loans

 

USD loans and Euro loansUSD loansUSD loans
Pledges and restrictions

Financial covenants - see Section C, a cross-default mechanism and a negative pledge.

 

Financial covenants - see Section C, a cross-default mechanism and a negative pledge.Financial covenants - see Section C, a cross-default mechanism and a negative pledge.

Financial covenants - see Section C and a negative pledge.

 

Non-utilization fee

 

0.32%

 

0.21%

 

0.19%

 

0.30%

 


(2)In October 2018, the Company entered into an agreement according to which, its commitment under certain revolving credit facility agreements will be reduced by a total aggregate amount of $655 million, to an amount of $1.2 billion.
(3)In June 2018, the maturity date of the credit facility was extended to 2025. In November 2018, the credit facility was reduced from $136 million to $100 million. As at the date of the report, the Company utilized $70 million of that credit facility.
F - 64

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018
Note 15 - Credit from Banks and Others (cont'd)


H. Pledges and Restrictions Placed in Respect of Liabilities
G.Pledges and Restrictions Placed in Respect of Liabilities

1)The Group has undertaken various obligations in respect of loans and credit received from non-Israelinon‑Israeli banks, including a negative pledge whereby the Group, committed, among other things, in favor of the lenders, to limit guarantees and indemnities to third parties (other than the guarantees in respect to subsidiaries) up to an agreed amount for $550 million. The Group has also undertaken to grant loans only to subsidiaries and to associated companies in which it holds at least 25% of the voting rights – not more than stipulated by the agreement with the banks. ICL has further committed not to grant any credit, other than in the ordinary course of business, and not to register any charges, including rights of lien, except those defined in the agreement as “liens permitted to be registered” on its existing and future assets and income. For details with regardsfurther information regarding to the covenants in respect of these loans, see Note 15.c.item D above.

2)In the third quarter of 2018, YPH JV entered into loan agreements in the total amount of RMB 500 million ($74 million) with the Bank of China. Since the partner (YTH) provided the bank with a full guarantee against the said loan, the Company pledged a portion of its shares in YPH JV (22%), which represents its part of the debt to YTH (RMB 250 million). The pledge agreement does not include restrictions on, among others, management of YPH JV's operations. The realization of the pledge will take place only if the guarantee is forfeited. For further information relating to loan for Bank of China, see item F above.
3)
As at December 31, 2016,2018 the total guarantees of the Company are $77 million, including $51 million to an associated Company.provided were about $79 million.

Note 16 – Other Current Liabilities

 As at December 31
 20162015
 $ millions$ millions
   
Employees210219
Governmental (mainly in respect of royalties) (1)11777
Accured expenses7299
Proposed Dividend60-
Current tax liabilities5762
Others192158
   
 708615
   


 As at December 31
 20182017
 $ millions$ millions

   
Employees 284269
Accrued expenses 8583
Governmental (mainly in respect of royalties) (1) 6167
Current tax liabilities 11288
Others 10588
   
  647595

(1)See Note 20.

F - 65

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018
Note 17 - Taxes on Income

A.Taxation of companies in Israel


A. Taxation of companies in Israel
1.
Measurement of results for tax purposes under the Income Tax Law (Adjustments for Inflation), 1985

The Income Tax Law (Adjustments for Inflation) – 1985 (hereinafter – the Law), which is effective as from the 1985 tax year, introduced the concept of measurement of results for tax purposes on a real (net of inflation) basis. On February 26, 2008, the Knesset enacted the Income Tax Law (Adjustments for Inflation) (Amendment No. 20) (Restriction of Commencement Period), 2008, whereby the effective period of the Inflationary Adjustments Law ceased at the end of the 2007 tax year and the depreciation of property, plant and equipment, is adjusted up to the end of the 2007 tax year, and from this time forward their linkage will be discontinued.

The Income Tax Regulations – Adjustments for Inflation (Rates of Depreciation), 1986, which allow depreciation at rates different than those in Section 21 of the Income Tax Ordinance, apply even after the Law is no longer in effect, and therefore the Company continues to claim accelerated depreciation, in certain situations, on the basis of these Regulations.

2.Income tax rates

Presented hereunder are the tax rates relevant to the Company in the years 2014–2016:

2014 – 26.5%

2015 – 26.5%

2016–2018 and after:

2016 – 25%

On January 4, 2016, the plenary Knesset passed the Law for Amendment of the Income Tax Ordinance (No. 216), 2016 which provides, inter alia, for a reduction of the Companies Tax rate commencing from January 1, 2016

2017 – 24%
2018 and thereafter by the rate of 1.5% such that the rate will be 25%.

In addition, onafter 23%

On December 22, 2016 the Israeli Knesset plenary Knesset passed the Economic Efficiency Law (Legislative Amendments for Achieving the Budget Targets for 2017 and 2018), 2016, which provides, among other things, for a reduction of the Companies Tax rate from 25% to 23% in two steps – the first step to the rate of 24% commencing from 2017 and the second step to the rate of 23% commencing from 2018 and thereafter, along with reduction of the tax rate applicable to “Preferred Enterprises” (see A.3.bA.2.b below) regarding factories in the peripheral suburban areas, from 9% to 7.5%, as part of amendment of the Law for Encouragement of Capital Investments.

The balances of the deferred taxes were updated in accordance with the new tax rates, as stated, which are expected to apply when the differences reverse. As a result of that stated, in the financial statements for 2016, the Company reduced the balances of the liabilities for deferred taxes, in the amount of $40 million, and the balances of the deferred taxes assets, in the amount of $7 million, against deferred tax income, in the amount of $32 million and against equity, in the amount of $1 million.

The current taxes for the periods reported are calculated in accordance with the tax rates shown inabove.
2. Tax benefits under the table above.


Note 17 - Taxes on Income (cont'd)

A.Taxation of companies in Israel (cont'd)

3.Tax benefits under the Israeli Law for the Encouragement of Capital Investments, 1959

(hereinafterIsraeli Law for the Encouragement of Capital Investments, 1959 (hereinafter“hethe Encouragement Law”)

Law)

a) Beneficiary Enterprises

The production facilities of some of the Company’s subsidiaries in Israel (hereinafter – “the Subsidiaries”)the Subsidiaries) have received “Beneficiary Enterprise” status under the Encouragement law, as worded after Amendment No. 60 to the Law published in April 2005.

The benefitsbenefit granted to the company are mainly:

1) Reducedis mainly reduced tax rates

Regarding the “tax exemption” track, therates.

The Company chose 2005 as the election year whereas regarding the “Ireland” track, which is subject to tax at the rate of 11.5%, the Company chose 2008 as the election year.

a "tax exemption" track. The benefits deriving from a “Beneficiary Enterprise” under the "tax exemption"this track ended in 2014 while2014. Within those years the benefits deriving Company benefited from the "Ireland" track will end reduced tax rates as well as in 2017.

some cases full tax exemption.

A company having a “Beneficiary Enterprise” that distributes a dividend out of exempt income, will be subject to Companies Taxcompanies tax in the year in which the dividend was distributed on the amount distributed (including the amount of the Companies Taxcompanies tax applicable due to the distribution) at the tax rate applicable under the Encouragement Law in the year in which the income was produced, had it not been exempt from tax.

The

As at December 31, 2018, the temporary difference related to distribution of a dividend from exempt income, as at December 31, 2016, in respect of which deferred taxes were not recognized, is in the amount of about $625$650 million (see also Section A.3.c below).

of distributable amount and about $162 million of derived taxes.

F - 66

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018
Note 17 - Taxes on Income (cont’d)

A. Taxation of companies in Israel (cont’d)
2. Tax benefits under the Israeli Law for the Encouragement of Capital Investments, 1959 (cont’d)
a) Beneficiary Enterprises (cont’d)
Under the “Ireland” track, the company paid reduced tax rate of 11.5% as of 2008 on parts of its income. The benefit deriving from the "Ireland" track ended in 2017.
The part of the taxable income entitled to benefits at reduced tax rates is calculated based on the basis of the ratio of the turnover of the “BenefitedBeneficiary Enterprise” to the Company’s total turnover. The turnover attributed to the “BenefitedBeneficiary Enterprise” is generally calculated according to the increase in the turnover compared to a “base” turnover, which is the average turnover in the three years prior to the year of election of the “BenefitedBeneficiary Enterprise”.


Note 17 - Taxes on Income (cont'd)

A.Taxation of companies in Israel (cont'd)

3.Tax benefits under the Law for the Encouragement of Capital Investments, 1959 (hereinafter – “the Encouragement Law”) (cont'd)

2) Accelerated depreciation

In respect of buildings, machinery and equipment used by the Approved Enterprise, the Company is entitled to claim accelerated depreciation as provided by law, commencing from the year each asset is placed in service.

b) Preferred Enterprises

On December 29, 2010, the Israeli Knesset approved the Economic Policy Law for 2011-2012,2011‑2012, whereby the Encouragement law, was amended (hereinafter – “the Amendment”)the Amendment). The Amendment is effective from January 1, 2011 and its provisions will apply to preferred income derived or accrued by a Preferred Enterprise, as defined in the Amendment, in 2011 and thereafter.

The Amendment does not apply to an Industrial Enterprise that is a mine, other facility for production of minerals or a facility for exploration of fuel. Therefore, ICL plants that are defined as mining plants and mineral producers will not be able to take advantage of the tax rates included as part of the Amendment. In addition, on August 5, 2013, the Law for Change in the Order of National Priorities, 2013, was passed by the Knesset, which provides that the tax rate applicable to a Preferred Enterprise in Development Area A will be 9% whereas the tax applicable to companies in the rest of Israel will be 16%. Pursuant to the amendment to the Encouragement law that was approved as part of the Economic Efficiency Law (Legislative Amendments for Achieving the Budget Targets for 2017 and 2018), 2016,,the tax rate applicable to enterprises in the suburban areas was reduced from 9% to 7.5%. The Company has Preferred Enterprises at the tax rate of 7.5%.

F - 67

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018
Note 17 - Taxes on Income (cont’d)

A. Taxation of companies in Israel (cont’d)
2. Tax benefits under the Israeli Law for the Encouragement of Capital Investments, 1959 (cont’d)
b) Preferred Enterprises (cont’d)
On November 30, 2015, the Economic Efficiency Law was passed by the Knesset, which expanded the exception to all of anthe Enterprise’s activities up to the time of the first marketable product (for additional details – see Section 54 below). Nonetheless, tax benefits to which a BenefitedBeneficiary Plant is entitled will not be cancelled in respect of investments up to December 31, 2012. Therefore, those plants will be able to utilize the tax benefits in respect of qualifying investments made up to December 31, 2012, in accordance with the provisions of the old law.


Note 17 - Taxes on Income (cont'd)

A.Taxation of companies in Israel (cont'd)

3.Tax benefits under the Law for the Encouragement of Capital Investments, 1959 (hereinafter – “the Encouragement Law”) (cont'd)

It is further provided in the Amendment that tax will not apply to a dividend distributed out of preferred income to a shareholder that is an Israeli-residentIsraeli‑resident company. A dividend distributed out of preferred income to a shareholder that is an individual or a foreign resident is subject to tax at the rate of 20%, unless a lower tax rate applies under a relevant treaty for prevention of double taxation.

c) Trapped Earnings

3. The Law – Temporary Order

On November 5, 2012, the Israeli Knesset passed Amendment No. 69 and Temporary Order tofor the Encouragement law (hereinafter – “the Temporary Order”)of Industry (Taxation), which offers a reduced tax rate arrangement to companies that received an exemption from Companies Tax under the aforesaid law. The Temporary Order provides that companies that choose to apply the Temporary Order (effective for one year), will be entitled to a reduced tax rate on the “release” of exempt profits. A company that elected to pay a preferential Companies Tax rate is required to invest in an industrial factory up to 50% of the tax savings it realized, during a period of 5 years, commencing from the year of the notice. Non-compliance with this condition will result in a charge to the Company for additional tax.

The Company applied the Temporary Order in 2013. Pursuant to the Company's decision and as required by the Temporary Order, up to December 31, 2014, the Company made the full amount of its required investment in an industrial factory.

4.The Law for the Encouragement of Industry (Taxation), 1969

1969
a)Some of the Company’s Israeli subsidiaries are “Industrial Enterprise”, as defined in the above-mentionedabove‑mentioned law. In respect of buildings, machinery and equipment owned and used by any  "Industrial Enterprise", the Company is entitled to claim accelerated depreciation as provided by the Income Tax Regulations – Adjustments for Inflation (Depreciation Rates), 1986 which allow accelerated depreciation to any "Industrial Enterprise" as of the tax year in which each asset is first placed in service.

b)The Industrial Enterprises owned by some of the Company's Israeli subsidiaries have a common line of production and, therefore, they file, together with the Company, a consolidated tax return in accordance with Section 23 of the Law for the Encouragement of Industry. Accordingly, each of the said companies is entitled to offset its tax losses against the taxable income of the other companies.

c)During 2016, based on the alternatives for filing tax reports in certain jurisdictions, the Company decided to file separate (non-consolidated) tax reports for various subsidiaries. As a result, the Company updated the balance of the liabilities for deferred taxes against recording of tax income, in the amount of $27 million.

Note 17 - Taxes on Income (cont'd)

A.Taxation of companies in Israel (cont'd)

5.
4. The Law for Taxation of Profits from Natural Resources
The Law for Taxation of Profits from Natural Resources

On November 30, 2015, the Knesset passed the Law for Taxation of Profits from Natural Resources (hereinafter – "the Law")the Law), which entered into effect onis effective since January 1, 2016, except with respect to DSW, regarding which the effective date is January 1, 2017.2016. The government take on natural resources in Israel includes three elements: Royalties, Natural Resources Tax and Companies Income Tax. The highlights of the Law are set forth below:

The total tax on natural resources in Israel will include three tax elements: royalties, Natural Resources Tax and Companies Tax.

Royalties:

The

In accordance with the Mines Ordinance, the rate of the royalties, in connection with resources produced from the quarries, in accordance with the Mines Ordinance will be 5% (with respect to. For production of the phosphates, the royalty rate will beis 5% of the value of the quantity produced – instead of 2%). produced.
Pursuant to the salt harvesting agreement signed with the Government onin July 8, 2012, the parties agreed, among other things,inter‑alia, to an increase in the rate of the royalties from 5% to 10% of the sales, for every quantityquantities of chloride potash chloride sold by the Company in a given year,DSW sells in excess of a quantity of 1.5 million tons. As parttonnes annually.
F - 68

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018
Note 17 - Taxes on Income (cont'd)

A. Taxation of companies in Israel (cont'd)
4. The Law for Taxation of Profits from Natural Resources (cont’d)
In addition, the salt harvesting agreement it was providedstates that if a lawlegislation is enacted that changes the specific fiscal policy in connection with reference to profits or royalties deriving from quarryingthe mining of quarries from the Dead Sea, the Company's consent to the increase of the royalties' rate on the surplus quantities referred to above will not apply, after the enactment of the royalties,legislation, to the period in which such additional tax is collected as stated will not apply. Thein the said legislation. In January 2016, the Law entered into effect on January 1, 2016.and accordingly the rate of the royalties' provision was updated to 5%. For additional details –information - see Note 20C.

Imposition of Natural Resources Tax:

The Natural Resources Tax is applied for all minerals from 2016 and for Potash from 2017. The tax base, which will be calculated for every resourcemineral separately, is the Company’smineral’s operating income in accordance with the accounting statement of income, to which certain adjustments will be made, less financing expenses at the rate of 5% of the Company’smineral’s average working capital, and less an amount that reflects a yield of 14% on the property, plant and equipment used for production and sale of the quarried material (hereinafter – “thethe Yield on the Property, Plant and Equipment”)Equipment). On the tax base, as stated, a progressive tax will be imposed at a rate to be determined based on the Yield on the Property, Plant and Equipment in that year. For the Yield on the Property, Plant and Equipment between 14% and 20%, Natural Resources Tax will be imposed at the rate of 25%, while the yield in excess of 20% will be subject to Natural Resources Tax at the rate of 42%. In years in which the Natural Resources Tax base is negative, the negative amount will be carried forward from year to year and will constitute a tax shield in the succeeding tax year. The above computations, including the right to use prior years’ losses, are made separately, without taking into account setoffs, for each natural resource production and sale activity.

Limitations on the Natural Resources Tax – the Natural Resources Tax will only apply to profits deriving from the actual production and sale of each of the following resources: potash, bromine, magnesium and phosphates, and not to the profits deriving from the downstream industrial activities. Calculation of the Natural Resources Tax will be made separately for every resource.mineral. Nonetheless, regarding Magnesium, it was provided that commencing from 2017,


Note 17 - Taxes on Income (cont'd)

A.Taxation of companies in Israel (cont'd)

5.The Law for Taxation of Profits from Natural Resources (cont’d)

upon sale of carnalite by DSW to Magnesium and reacquisition of a Sylvanite by-productSylvinite by‑product by DSW, Magnesium will charge DSW $100 per tontonne of potash which is produced from the SylvaniteSylvinite (linked to the CPI).

A mechanism was provided for determination of the market price with respect to transactions in natural resources executed between related parties in Israel, as well as a mechanism for calculation of the manner for allocation of the expenses between the production and sale of the natural resource, on the one hand, and the downstream activities, on the other hand.

Regarding the bromine resource, the Natural Resources Tax will apply in the same manner in which it applies to the other natural resources, except with respect to the manner of determining the transfer price in sales made to related parties in and outside of Israel.
F - 69

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018
Note 17 - Taxes on Income (cont'd)

A. Taxation of companies in Israel (cont'd)
4. The Law for Taxation of Profits from Natural Resources (cont’d)
For purposes of calculating the total revenues from bromine sold to related parties for purposes of downstream manufacturing activities in every tax year, a calculation method will be employed (Netback) whereby the price will be determined based on the higher of the following:

1) The price for a unit of bromine (ton) provided in the transaction;

2) The normative price of a unit of bromine. The normative price of a unit of bromine is the total sales of the downstream products produced less the operating expenses attributable to the downstream activities, without the acquisition cost of the bromine, and less an amount equal to 12% of the total revenues of the downstream products produced as part of the downstream activities, where the result is divided by the number of bromine units used to produce the downstream products sold.

1)The price for a unit of bromine (tonne) provided in the transaction;
2)The normative price of a unit of bromine. The normative price of a unit of bromine is the total sales of the downstream products produced less the operating expenses attributable to the downstream activities, without the acquisition cost of the bromine, and less an amount equal to 12% of the total revenues of the downstream products produced as part of the downstream activities, where the result is divided by the number of bromine units used to produce the downstream products sold.
Regarding the phosphate resource, for purposes of calculating the total revenues from phosphate sold to related parties for purposes of downstream manufacturing activities in every tax year, a calculation method will be employed (Netback) whereby the price will be determined based on the higher of the following:

1) The price for a unit of phosphate (ton) provided in the transaction;

2) The normative price of a unit of phosphate. The “normative price” of a unit of phosphate is the total sales of the downstream products produced less the operating expenses attributable to the downstream activities, without the acquisition cost of the phosphate rock, and less an amount equal to 12% of the total revenues of the downstream products produced as part of the downstream activities, where the result is divided by the number of phosphate units used to produce the downstream products sold.


Note 17 - Taxes on Income (cont'd)

A.1)TaxationThe price for a unit of companiesphosphate (tonne) provided in Israel (cont'd)the transaction;

5.2)
The normative price of a unit of phosphate. The “normative price” of a unit of phosphate is the total sales of the downstream products produced less the operating expenses attributable to the downstream activities, without the acquisition cost of the phosphate rock, and less an amount equal to 12% of the total revenues of the downstream products produced as part of the downstream activities, where the result is divided by the number of phosphate units used to produce the downstream products sold.
3)The Law for Taxationproduction and operating costs attributable to a unit of Profits from Natural Resources (cont’d)phosphate.

3)

The production and operating costs attributableCompany took a tax filing position, according to which, all the Dead Sea minerals should be taxed as a unit of phosphate.

unified mineral under the above-mentioned mechanism.

Companies Tax:

The Law for Encouragement of Capital Investments was revised such that the definition of a “Plant for Production of Quarries” will include all the plant’s activities up to production of the first marketable natural resource, of potash, bromine, magnesium and phosphates. Accordingly, activities involved with production of the resource will not be entitled to tax benefits under the Law, whereas activities relating to downstream products, such as bromine compounds, acids and fertilizers, will not constitute a base for calculating the Excess Profits Tax and will not be exceptedexempted from inclusion in the Law.

The Natural Resource Tax will be deductible from the Company's taxable income and the Company will pay the Companies Tax on the balance as is customary in Israel.

B.Taxation of non-Israeli subsidiaries

F - 70

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018
Note 17 - Taxes on Income (cont'd)

B. Taxation of non-Israeli subsidiaries
Subsidiaries incorporated outside of Israel are assessed for tax under the tax laws in their countries of residence. The principal tax rates applicable to the major subsidiaries outside Israel are as follows:

Subsidiary incorporated in the Netherlands – tax rate of 25%.

Subsidiary incorporated in Germany – tax rate of 29%.

Subsidiary incorporated in the United States – tax rate of 40%.

Subsidiary incorporated in Spain – tax rate of 25%.

Subsidiary incorporated in United Kingdom – tax rate of 20% (*).

Subsidiary incorporated in China – tax rate of 25%.

(*) The tax rate in the UK was reduced to 19% effective from April 1, 2017 and 17% from commencing April 1, 2020.

CountryTax rateNote
Brazil34% 
Germany29% 
United States26% (1)
Netherlands25% (3)
Spain25% 
China25% 
United Kingdom19% (2)
C.(1)Carried forward
The tax lossesrate above includes federal and states tax. In December 2017, the U.S. government enacted comprehensive tax legislation commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (hereinafter - the Tax Act). The Tax Act significantly revises the future ongoing U.S. federal corporate income tax by, among other things, lowering U.S. corporate income tax rates and implementing a territorial tax system. The lower corporate income tax rates are effective as of January 1, 2018. The Company examined the effects of the Tax Act's implementation and found that the main impact is the re‑measurement of the deferred tax assets and liabilities to incorporate the lower Federal corporate tax rate of 21% and as a result, in the financial statements of 2017, the Company reduced the balances of the assets and liabilities for deferred taxes, in the net amount of $13 million.

The Tax Act is comprehensive and complex and may lead to future interpretations regarding the manner of its implementation, which may impact the Company’s estimations and conclusions. The Company believes the tax expenses and liabilities in its financial statements are in accordance with the Tax Act and represent its best estimate.
(2)The tax rate in the UK was reduced to 19% effective from April 1, 2017 and 17% commencing from April 1, 2020.
(3)The tax rates in the Netherlands will be reduced, in stages, by the total of 4% by 2021, as follows: 1% in 2019, 1.5% in 2020 and 1.5% in 2021. In 2021, The tax rate will be 21%.
F - 71

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018
Note 17 - Taxes on Income (cont'd)

C. Carried forward tax losses
As at December 31, 2016, the balance of the deductible temporary differences in respect of which deferred taxes were not recorded amounts to about $12 million.

As at December 31, 2016,2018, the balances of the carryforward tax losses of subsidiaries for which deferred taxes were recorded, amount tois about $454$477 million (December 31, 20152017 – about $397$308 million).

The

As at December 31, 2018, the balances of the carryforward tax losses to future years of subsidiaries for which deferred taxes were not recorded, is about $409$322 million (December 31, 20152017 – about $121$322 million). The increase derived mainly from the Allana project termination.


Note 17 - Taxes on Income (cont'd)

C.Carried forward tax losses (cont'd)

As at the date of the report,December 31, 2018, the capital losses for tax purposes available for carryforward to future years for which deferred taxes were not recorded amount to is about $174$134 million (December 31, 20152017 – about $41$159 million). The increase derived mainly from
As at December 31, 2018, the ERP project (Harmonization) discontinuance.

D.Tax assessments

capital losses for tax purposes available for carryforward to future years for which deferred taxes were recorded is to about $15 million (December 31, 2017 – about $16 million).
D. Tax assessments
1)
The Company and the main operational companies consolidated with it for Israeli tax purposesin Israel (DSW, Rotem, Bromine, DSM, BCL and F&C), along with most of the other companies in Israel, have received final tax assessments up to and including the 2011 tax year.2011. The main subsidiaries outside of Israel have final tax assessments up to and including the 2010, 2011 and 2012 tax years..

2)
Israel - In December 2013, an assessment was received from2018, the Israeli Tax Authority (“ITA”) wherebyAuthorities (hereinafter - the ITA) rejected the company's objection relating to an assessment issued to the Company is requiredand to paycertain Israeli subsidiaries, and demanded an additional tax in addition to the amount it already paid in respect ofpayment, for the years 2009-2011,2012‑2014, in the amount of about $235$73 million. The Company appealeddisputes the ITA's assessment. On December 8, 2016,assessment and filed an appeal to the Jerusalem District Court. In the Company’s estimation, it is more likely than not that its claims will be accepted.
In addition, regarding tax assessment for the years 2010-2015 for Tetrabrom (one of the downstream production companies in Israel), in October 2018, the company reached an agreement with the ITA, which resulted in immaterial amounts.
3)
The company's subsidiary in Belgium recognized a notion deduction on its capital based on its interpretation of the Belgian tax law, which was validated by the Court of Appeals in Belgium. The tax authorities dispute the eligibility of the deduction by appealing to the Supreme Court against the Court of Appeals' resolution and issuing tax assessments in a total amount of $27 million for the years commencing 2010. The Company believes, it is more likely than not that its tax position will also be accepted by the Supreme Court.
4)
Currently, the Company withdrew the said appealis also under tax audits in Spain and agreed with the Taxes Authority to close out the assessmentGermany for the above-mentioned years and to also put an end to2012‑2015. As at the main disputesdate of the report, there are no additional tax payment requests from the tax authorities, excluding immaterial amounts in connection withGermany. The Company believes that the open tax years,provisions in consideration of payment of an additional amount, beyond the amounts paid up to now, in the amount of $60 million, including interest and linkage differences.its books are sufficient.

In light

F - 72

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018

Note 17 - Taxes on Income (cont'd)

E. Uncertain Tax Position
The measurement of the estimated Tax provisions as at December 31, 2018, requires judgment relating to certain tax positions, which may result in future demand for additional tax payments by the Tax authorities. A provision will be recorded only when the Company estimates that stated above,the chances of its positions to be accepted are lower than the chances they will be rejected. It is possible that the tax authorities will demand additional tax payments that are not known to the Company at this stage.
The Law for Taxation of Profits from Natural Resources in Israel (hereinafter – the Law) is a new law that entered into effect with respect to the bromine, phosphate and magnesium minerals in 2016, and with regard to the potash mineral, in 2017. As at the date of the report, no regulations have yet been issued under the Law (except regarding to advanced tax payments regulations published in July 2018), no circulars have been published and no court decisions have been rendered as to the implementation of this Law. The manner of application of the Law, including preparation of the financial statements for each mineral, involves interpretations and assumptions on a number of significant matters, which require management’s judgment.
Based on the law's interpretation, the Company’s position is that the carrying amount of the property, plant and equipment for the purpose of preparation of the Subsidiaries’ financial statements for 2016 and onward, which serve as a basis for the reports filed pursuant to the provisions of the Law,  can be presented on the basis of fair value revaluation, on the date the Law enters into effect. Presenting property, plant and equipment based on fair value revaluation is in accordance with one of the permitted methods in International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), which apply to the Company updatedand its Subsidiaries and are accepted accounting principles in Israel. There is no resulting change in the Company's consolidated financial statements.
The tax provisions,authority's position could be materially different, even in very significant amounts, as a result of different interpretation regarding the implementation of the Law, including regarding matters other than the measurement of the property, plant and equipment. If the above-mentioned tax position is rejected by the Israel tax authority, meaning measurement of the property, plant and equipment, for this purpose, should have been in accordance with historical values, the result would be an increase in the company's tax liabilities in an aggregate amount of about $34 million.$100 million for the years 2016-2018.
The Company estimates that it is more likely than not that its position will be accepted. As at the date of the report, the Company has provisionsbelieves that the tax provision in its books that fully coverfinancial statements represents the above-mentioned agreement.

3)In connection with the tax returns for the years 2012–2014, in 2015 the Company received a refund of advance tax deposits, in the amount of about $117 million.

4)In light of the decision of the Court for Tax Matters in Belgium, from April 2016, to reject the petition filed by a subsidiary of ICL in connection with deduction of certain expenses in prior periods, and following charges received from the Belgium Tax Authorities, the Company recorded tax expenses in its financial statements for 2016, in the aggregate amount of $14 million. The Company has filed an appeal of the Court’s decision. A hearing with respect to the matter has been scheduled to be held in December 2017.

5)Regarding the tax assessment of a subsidiary in Ethiopia, Allana Afar, in the amount of about $58 million (including interest) – see Note 13.
best estimate of the tax payment expected to be incurred with reference to the Law.
Given the mineral's price environment, its effect on the profitability of the subsidiaries and after deduction of a 14% return on the balance of property, plant and equipment, as stated in the law, as at December 31, 2018, no natural resources tax liability was payable.
The total royalties paid by the company to the Israeli government in 2018 amounted to $133 million (see Note 20).
F - 73

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018

Note 17 - Taxes on Income (cont'd)


F. Deferred income taxes
1. The composition of the deferred taxes and the changes therein, are as follows:
E.In respect of financial positionDeferred income taxes
In respect
of carry forward tax losses
Total
Depreciable property,
plant and equipment and intangible assets
InventoriesProvisions for employee benefitsOther
$ millions

1.The composition of the deferred taxes and the changes therein, are as follows:

 In respect of financial position  
 

Depreciable property,

plant and equipment

InventoriesProvisions for employee benefitsOther

In respect

of carry forward tax losses

Total
 $ millions
       
Balance as at January 1, 2015 (388) 39 146 4 97(102)
Changes in 2015:      
Additions in respect of business combinations 4 7- (53) 13(29)
Amounts recorded to a  capital reserve-- (15)- 3(12)
Translation differences 5- (4) (3) (2)(4)
Amounts recorded in the statement of income

16

-

(21)

4

(4)

(5)

       
Balance as at  December 31, 2015

(363)

46

106

(48)

107

(152)

       
Changes in 2016:      
Additions in respect of business combinations in prior year (2)----(2)
Amounts recorded to a  capital reserve-- 8 (5) (1)2
Translation differences 1- (6) 7 (5)(3)
Amounts recorded in the statement of income

(6)

(11)

(32)

45

6

2

       
Balance as at December 31, 2016

(370)

35

76

(1)

107

(153)

       

2.The currencies in which the deferred taxes are denominated:

 As at December 31
 20162015
 $ millions$ millions
   
Dollar(25)(3)
Euro30(1)
Shekels(179)(126)
Other21(22)
   
 (153)(152)
   

Balance as at January 1, 2017 (374) 45 75 2 99 (153)
Changes in 2017:      
Amounts recorded in the statement of income 74 (17) 1 11 (36) 33
Change in tax rate 13---- 13
Amounts recorded to a capital reserve-- 3 5- 8
Translation differences (6)- 5- 1-
Transfer to the group assets held for sale 2-- 1- 3
       
Balance as at December 31, 2017 (291) 28 84 19 64 (96)
       
Changes in 2018:      
Amounts recorded in the statement of income (123) (2) (6)- 55 (76)
Amounts recorded to a capital reserve-- (3) 2- (1)
Translation differences 2- (1) (1) (2) (2)
       
Balance as at December 31, 2018 (412) 26 74 20 117 (175)


F - 74

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018
Note 17 - Taxes on Income (cont'd)

F.Taxes on income included in the income statements

1.Composition

 For the year ended December 31
 201620152014
 $ millions$ millions$ millions
    
Current taxes6815976
Deferred taxes(45)(7)37
Taxes in respect of prior years (*)321053
 55162166
    

(*)The balance, as at December 31, 2016, includes impacts from an agreement with the Israeli Tax Authority (see 17.D(2) above) and tax expenses recognized following charges received from the Belgium Tax Authorities (see 17.D(4) above).

2.Theoretical tax


F. Deferred income taxes (cont'd)
2. The currencies in which the deferred taxes are denominated:
 As at December 31
 20182017
 $ millions$ millions

Euro 22 33
British Pound 21 22
U.S Dollar (7) 10
Israeli Shekels (204) (166)
Other (7) 5
  (175) (96)


G. Taxes on income included in the income statements
1.  Composition of income tax expenses (income(
 For the year ended December 31
 201820172016
 $ millions$ millions$ millions

Current taxes 53 208 68
Deferred taxes 76 (23) (45)
Taxes in respect of prior years- (27) 32
  129 158 55


F - 75

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018
Note 17 - Taxes on Income (cont'd)

G. Taxes on income included in the income statements (cont'd)
2.  Theoretical tax
Following is a reconciliation of the theoretical tax expense, assuming all income is taxed at the regular tax rates in Israel (see A(2) above) and the tax expense presented in the statements of income:

 For the year ended December 31
 201620152014
 $ millions$ millions$ millions
    
Income (loss) before taxes on income, as reported in the statements of income(117)668632
Statutory tax rate (in Israel)25%26.5%26.5%
Theoretical tax expense (income) on this income (loss)(29)177167
Add (less) – the tax effect of:   
Tax benefits deriving from the Law for Encouragement of Capital Investments(8)(22)(43)
Natural Resources Tax5--
Differences deriving from additional deduction and different tax rates applicable to foreign subsidiaries(38)(15)(27)
Deductible temporary differences for which deferred taxes assets were not recorded and non–deductible expenses (1)135156
Taxes in respect of prior years321053
Impact of change in tax rates(32)--
Other differences(10)(3)10
Taxes on income included in the income statements55162166
    

 For the year ended December 31
 201820172016
 $ millions$ millions$ millions

Income (loss) before income taxes, as reported in the statements of income 1,364 505 (117)
Statutory tax rate (in Israel)23%24%25%
Theoretical tax expense (income) 314 121 (29)
Add (less) – the tax effect of:   
Tax benefits deriving from the Law for Encouragement of Capital Investments net of natural Resources Tax (20) (4) (3)
Differences deriving from additional deduction and different tax rates applicable to foreign subsidiaries (1) (186) 23 (38)
Income taxes from intercompany dividend distribution- 18-
Deductible temporary differences for which deferred taxes assets were not recorded and non–deductible expenses 24 15 135
Taxes in respect of prior years- (27) 32
Impact of change in tax rates- (13) (32)
Differences in measurement basis (mainly ILS vs USD) (11) 18 1
Other differences 8 7 (11)
Taxes on income included in the income statements 12915855

(1)The amount in 2016 derives, mainly,Mainly related to the exempt income resulting from terminationthe sale of the Allana projectfire safety and the discontinuance of the ERP (Harmonization) project.oil additives business in March 2018. For additional information see Note 10.

Note 17 -

H. Taxes on Income (cont'd)

G.Taxes on income relating to items recorded in equity

 For the year ended December 31
 201620152014
 $ millions$ millions$ millions
Tax recorded in other comprehensive income   
Actuarial gains from defined benefit plan8(15)24
Change in fair value of financial assets available for sale(5)--
Taxes in respect of exchange rate differences on equity loan to a subsidiary included in translation adjustment(1)312
    
 2(12)36
    
income relating to items recorded in equity

 For the year ended December 31
 201820172016
 $ millions$ millions$ millions

Tax recorded in other comprehensive income   
Actuarial gains from defined benefit plan (3) 3 8
Change in investments at fair value through other comprehensive income- 5 (5)
Taxes in respect of exchange rate differences on equity loan to a subsidiary included in translation adjustment 2 (5) (1)
Total (1) 3 2

F - 76

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018

Note 18 - Employee Benefits

A.Composition


A. Composition
Composition of employee benefits:

 As at December 31
 20162015
 $ millions$ millions
   
Fair value of plan assets552669
Termination benefits(147)(132)
Defined benefit obligation(934)(1,025)
 (529)(488)
   

 As at December 31
 20182017
 $ millions$ millions

Fair value of plan assets 518 631
Termination benefits (111) (142)
Defined benefit obligation (860) (1,068)
  (453) (579)

Composition of fair value of the plan assets:

 As at December 31
 20162015
 $ millions$ millions
   
Equity instruments  
With quoted market price205210
Debt instruments  
With quoted market price133175
Without quoted market price126138
 259313
   
Deposits with insurance companies88146
   
 552669
   
 As at December 31
 20182017
 $ millions$ millions

Equity instruments  
With quoted market price 200 197
   
Debt instruments  
With quoted market price 164 179
Without quoted market price 119 145
  283 324
   
Deposits with insurance companies 35 110
   
  518 631


F - 77

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018
Note 18 - Employee Benefits (cont'd)

B.Severance pay

1.Israeli companies


B. Severance pay
1. Israeli companies
Pursuant to Israeli labor laws and the labor contracts in force, the Company and its Israeli subsidiaries are required to pay severance pay to dismissed employees and employees leaving their employment in certain other circumstances. Severance pay is computed based on length of service and generally according to the latest monthly salary and one month’s salary for each year worked.

The liabilities relating to employee severance pay rights are covered as follows:

a) Under collective labor agreements, the Group companies in Israel make current deposits in outside pension plans for some of the employees. These plans generally provide full severance pay coverage and, in some cases, 72% of the severance pay liability.

a)Under collective labor agreements, the Group companies in Israel make current deposits in outside pension plans for some of the employees. These plans generally provide full severance pay coverage.
The severance pay liabilities covered by these plans are not reflected in the financial statements, since all the risks relating to the payment of the severance pay, as described above, have been transferred to the pension funds.

b) The Group companies in Israel make current deposits in insurance policies in respect of employees holding management positions. These policies provide coverage for the severance pay liability in respect of the said personnel. Under employment agreements, subject to certain limitations, these insurance policies are the property of the employees. The amounts funded in respect of these policies are not reflected in the statements of financial position since they are not under the control and management of the companies.

c) As to the balance of the liabilities that are not funded, as mention above, a provision is recorded in the financial statements based on an actuarial calculation.

2.b)Certain subsidiaries outsideThe Group companies in Israel make current deposits in insurance policies in respect of employees holding management positions. These policies provide coverage for the severance pay liability in respect of the said personnel. Under employment agreements, subject to certain limitations, these insurance policies are the property of the employees. The amounts funded in respect of these policies are not reflected in the statements of financial position since they are not under the control and management of the Group.

c)As to the balance of the liabilities that are not funded, as mention above, a provision is recorded in the financial statements based on an actuarial calculation.
2. Certain subsidiaries outside Israel
In countries wherein subsidiaries operate that have no law requiring payment of severance pay, the Group companies have not recorded a provision in the financial statements for possible eventual future severance payments to employees, except in cases where part of the activities of the enterprise is discontinued and, as a result, the employees are dismissed.


Note 18 - Employee Benefits (cont'd)

C.Pension and early retirement

C. Pension and early retirement
1)Some of the Group’s employees in and outside of Israel (some of whom have already left the Group) have defined benefit pension plans for their retirement, which are controlled by the Company. Generally, according to the terms of the plans, as stated, the employees are entitled to receive pension payments based on, among other things, their number of years of service (in certain cases up to 70% of their last base salary) or computed, in certain cases, based on a fixed salary. Some employees of a subsidiary in Israel are entitled to early retirement if they meet certain conditions, including age and seniority at the time of retirement.

In addition, some Group companies have entered into plans with funds –

F - 78

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018

Note 18 - Employee Benefits (cont'd)

C. Pension and with a pension fund for some of the employees – under which such companies make current deposits with that fund which releases them from their liability for making a pension payment under the labor agreements to all of their employees upon reaching aearly retirement age. The amounts funded are not reflected in the statements of financial position since they are not under the control and management of the Group companies.

(cont'd)
In addition, some Group companies have entered into plans with funds – and with a pension fund for some of the employees – under which such companies make current deposits with that fund which releases them from their liability for making a pension payment under the labor agreements to all of their employees upon reaching a retirement age. The amounts funded are not reflected in the statements of financial position since they are not under the control and management of the Group companies.
2)At
In May 2018, a collective labor agreement was signed between Dead Sea Works Ltd. (hereinafter - DSW) and the endDSW’s Workers Council, the New General Organization of 2015, anWorkers in Israel and the Histadrut’s Negev District branch, for a period of five years (hereinafter – the Agreement), commencing on October 1, 2017, the termination date of the previous labor agreement. The key provisions of the Agreement are as follows:
a) Arrangement of wage increases to the employees to whom the Agreement applies;  b) completion of execution of the DSW efficiency plan was approved whereby it was decided to reduceby September 30, 2021, in accordance with the numberprovisions specified in the Agreement; c) during the efficiency period, mentioned above, no collective dismissals shall be implemented; d) the declared labor disputes are cancelled and throughout the Agreement period appropriate labor relations shall be maintained and no actions shall be taken which may cause a work disruption; e) payment of a signing bonus upon signing of the Company's employeesAgreement.
Considering the aforesaid, in the United Kingdom. As a result of that stated, in 2015,financial statements for 2018, the Company recognized an expense was recorded, in the amount of about $6$5 million indue to the "othersigning bonus, under "salary expenses" category in the statement of income.

3)During 2015, as partIn January 2018, considering the Company's decision to discontinue the production of potash at ICL Boulby and to commence full production of Polysulphate in the Company’s efficiencysecond half of 2018, a personnel reduction's plan and in light of the agreement between Dead Sea Works Ltd. and Bromine Compounds Ltd., on the one side, and the General Workers Union, the Council of Dead Sea Works Ltd. and Workers Council of Bromine Compounds Ltd., on the other side, ending the strike, which is in response to the efficiency plan (hereinafter – "the Agreement"), a decision was made with respect to voluntary retirement under the “early retirement” track of 210 employees and termination of the employment of 38 employees under the “severance pay” track.approved. As a result, in 2015, the Company increased the provision for employee severance benefits in respect of conclusion of employment by the aggregate amount of about $42 million.

In addition, according to the above-mentioned agreement, in 2016 the Company signed an additional early retirement agreement with a number of employees of Bromine Compounds Ltd. As a result, the Company increased the provision for employee severance benefits in respect of conclusion of employment by the amount of about $27 million.

4)Further to the Company’s efficiency plan, in December 2016, the Company signed an early retirement agreement with 270 employees of YPH (a Chinese partnership). As a result, in the financial statements for 2016, the Company recorded, a provisionin its financial statements of 2018, an increase of about $7 million under "provision for employee severance benefits in respect of conclusion of employment by the amount of about $10 million.benefits".
F - 79

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018

Note 18 - Employee Benefits (cont’d)

D.Post-employment retirement benefits

(cont'd)


D. Post-employment retirement benefits
Some of the retirees of the Group companies receive, aside from the pension payments from a pension fund, benefits that are primarily festivalholiday gifts and weekends. The companies’ liability for these costs accrues during the employment period. The Group companies include in their financial statements the projected costs in the post-employment period according to an actuarial calculation.

E.Movement in net defined benefit assets (liabilities) and in their components:

 Fair value of plan assetsDefined benefit obligationDefined benefit  obligation, net
 201620152016201520162015
 $ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions
       
Balance as at January 1669766(1,025)(1,260)(356)(494)
       
Income (loss) included in profit or loss:      
Current service costs--(11)(36)(11)(36)
Interest income (costs)1321(33)(37)(20)(16)
Past service cost(70)-84-14-
Effect of movements in exchange rates, net3(1)(5)-(2)(1)
Included in other comprehensive income:      
Actuarial losses deriving from changes in demographic assumptions---(9)-(9)
Actuarial gains (losses) deriving from changes in financial assumptions--(82)94(82)94
Other actuarial gains (losses)34(22)--34(22)
Change in respect to translation differences ,net(56)(31)71561525
Other movements      
Benefits paid(54)(53)681381485
Assets held for sale-(17)-30-13
Employer contribution125--125
Employee contribution11(1)(1)--
Balance as at December 31552669(934)(1,025)(382)(356)
       

E. Movement in net defined benefit assets (liabilities) and in their components:

 Fair value of plan assetsDefined benefit obligationDefined benefit obligation, net
 201820172018201720182017
 $ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions

Balance as at January 1 631 552 (1,068) (934) (437) (382)
       
Income (costs) included in profit or loss:      
Current service costs-- (24) (24) (24) (24)
Interest income (costs) 14 17 (26) (29) (12) (12)
Past service cost-- 7- 7-
Effect of movements in exchange rates, net (17) 23 37 (39) 20 (16)
Included in other comprehensive income:      
Actuarial gains (losses) deriving from changes in financial assumptions-- 71 (42) 71 (42)
Other actuarial gains (losses) (15) 25-- (15) 25
Change in respect to translation differences, net (19) 36 21 (65) 2 (29)
Other movements:      
Benefits paid (38) (36) 73 64 35 28
Conversion to defined contribution plans (49)- 49---
Transferred to assets held for sale--- 1- 1
Employer contribution 11 14-- 11 14
Balance as at December 31 518 631 (860) (1,068) (342) (437)

The actual return (loss) on plan assets in the year 20162018 is $47$(-1) million compare with ($1)$42 million in the year 20152017 and $85$47 million in 2016.
F - 80

Notes to the year 2014.

Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018

Note 18 - Employee Benefits (cont’d)

F.Actuarial assumptions


F. Actuarial assumptions
Principal actuarial assumptions atas of the reporting date (expressed as weighted averages):

 For the year ended December 31
 201620152014
 %%%
    
Discount rate as at December 31 3.2 3.33.2
Future salary increases 2.6 2.93.4
Future pension increase 2.0 2.22.1
    

 For the year ended December 31
 201820172016
 %%%

Discount rate as at December 31 3.0 2.7 2.9
Future salary increases 3.3 3.2 2.6
Future pension increase 2.2 2.2 2.2

The assumptions regarding the future mortality rate are based on published statistics and accepted mortality tables.

G.Sensitivity analysis

G. Sensitivity analysis
Assuming all other assumptions remain constant, the following reasonable possible changes effect the defined benefit obligation as of the date of the financial statements in the following manner:

 December 2016
 Decrease 10%Decrease
5%
Increase
5%
Increase 
10%
 $ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions
Significant actuarial assumptions    
Salary increase2211(12)(25)
Discount rate(40)(19)1836
Mortality table(18)(9)918
     

H.December 2018
Effect of the plans on the Group's future cash flowsDecrease 10%
Decrease
5%
Increase
5%
Increase
10%
$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions


Significant actuarial assumptions    
Salary increase 18 9 (9) (18)
Discount rate (32) (16) 16 32
Mortality table (17) (9) 9 17


H. Effect of the plans on the Group's future cash flows
The expenses recorded in respect of defined contribution plans in 2016 is about $322018 are $35 million (in 20152017 and 2014 –$232016 $37 million and $26$38 million, respectively).
The Company’s estimate of the deposits expected to be made in 20172019 in funded defined benefit plans is about $11$10 million.

In the Company’s estimation, as at December 31, 2016,2018, the life of the defined benefit plans, (basedbased on a weighted average)average, is about 15.313.8 years (2015–(2017 – about 12.216.3 years).


Note 18

F - Employee Benefits (cont’d)

I.Long-term remuneration plan

In 2014, ICL's Board of Directors decided to approve a long-term remuneration plan for about 11,800 Company employees that are not managers, who participated in the Company's options and shares plan (which was approved on the same date) pursuant81


Notes to the terms provided in the plan. The maximum cost of the plan is about $17 million. AsConsolidated Financial Statements as at the date of the financial statements, the said terms were not met and, accordingly, no liability was recorded in the books in respect of this plan.

December 31, 2018

Note 19 – Provisions


Composition and changes in the provision

A.Restoration's site and equipment's dismantlingComposition and changes in the provisionLegal claimsOtherTotal
$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions

 Site restoration,   
 removal and   
 dismantling   
 of property,   
 plant  and equipment   
 itemsLegal claimsOtherTotal
 $ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions
     
Balance as at January 1, 20161321126169
Provisions recorded during the period (1)52660118
Provisions reversed during the period(3)-(2)(5)
Payments during the  period(3)-(6)(9)
Translation differences(6)-1(5)
Balance as at December 31, 20161721779268
     


Balance as at January 1, 2018 194 28 49 271
Provisions recorded during the period (1) 25 2- 27
Provisions reversed during the period (3)- (6) (9)
Payments during the period (6) (11)- (17)
Translation differences (5) (1)- (6)
Balance as at December 31, 2018 205 18 43 266

(1)For moreadditional information, see Note 20 (b) and (c) regarding concessions and contingent liabilities.20.

F - 82

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018

Note 20 - Commitments, Concessions and Contingent Liabilities

A.Commitments

A. Commitments
(1)Several of the Group’s subsidiaries have entered into agreements with suppliers in and outside of Israel for the purchase of raw materials and energy in the ordinary course of business, for various periods ending on December 31, 2023. TheAs of December 31, 2018, the total amount of the commitments under the said purchase periods of the agreements is approximately $494 million asabout $2.67 billion. This item takes into consideration part of December 31, 2016.the agreements described below.

(2)Several of the Group’s subsidiaries have entered into agreements with suppliers for the acquisition of property, plant and equipment. As at December 31, 2016,2018, the subsidiaries hadhave capital purchase commitments of about $169$368 million. This item takes into consideration part of the agreements described below.

(3)In October 2017, Dead Sea Works (hereinafter - DSW) signed an agreement, the cost of which for ICL is $280 million, for the execution of the first stage of the Salt Harvesting Project, with a contracting company Holland Shallow Seas Dredging Ltd., which includes, among others, the construction of a special dredger that is designed to execute the salt harvesting. The dredger is expected to enter into service towards the end of 2019. For further information - see item C(2).
(4)In 2017 and 2018, DSW signed agreements with several execution and infrastructure companies, in a total amount of $160 million (out of the total project cost of about $250 million), for construction of the new pumping station (hereinafter - the P-9 Pumping Station). The P-9 Pumping Station is expected to commence its operation during the year 2020. For further information – see item C(2).
(5)
Subsequent to the date of the report, in February 2019, the Company signed agreements for the sale of two office buildings, located in Be'er Sheva, Israel, for a total consideration of NIS 78 million ($21 million). The carrying amount of the two buildings is $7.3 million. Concurrent with the sale agreements, the Company signed lease agreements for the said buildings, for a period of 10 years with an option to terminate after four years. In accordance with IFRS16, since the above‑mentioned transactions meet the definition of sale and leaseback, part of the expected profit will be deferred by being deducted from the right‑to‑use asset.
(6)
In 2012, the Company started the construction of a new cogeneration power station (EPC) in Sodom, Israel (hereinafter – the Station). The Station has a production capacity of about 330 tonnes of steam per hour and about 230 MW, which supply electricity and steam requirements for the production plants at the Sodom site and for third party customers. In August 2018, the process of certification approval was completed, and the Power Station started operating in full. The Company intends to operate the Station concurrently with the existing power station, which will continue operating on a partial basis in a "hot back‑up" format, for production of electricity and steam. The total power produced at both stations can reach up to 245 MW.
Regarding to the construction agreement of the Station, in light of the continued violations by the executing contractor (the Spanish Company - Abengoa), in September 2017, the Company notified of the cancellation of the agreement. Due to financial disputes between the Company and Abengoa, in November 2018, the Company announced the initiation of an arbitration proceeding, in accordance with the provisions of the agreement.
F - 83

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018
Note 20 - Commitments, Concessions and Contingent Liabilities (cont'd)
A. Commitments (cont'd)
(6)(cont'd)
In the Company's estimate, the damages caused by Abengoa amounted to about euro 77 million (about $ 84 million). On January 30, 2019, Abengoa submitted its response, denying ICL's claims, and claiming a payment of euro 15 million ($17 million) for the contract's termination, which was, allegedly, done unlawfully and for convenience. As at the date of the report, considering the early stages of the proceedings, there is a difficulty in estimating the chances of the outcome.
(7)In February 2018, the Company entered into two supply agreements with Tamar and “Leviathan” reservoir (hereinafter – the Agreements), to secure its gas supply needs until the end of 2025 or until the entry of the “Karish” and “Tanin” reservoirs into service, whichever occurs first. The gas price in the Agreements is in accordance with the gas price formulas stipulated under the government’s gas outline. The Company anticipates that the scope of the annual gas consumption will be about 0.75 BCM.
The Company is entitled to terminate the Agreements in order to start the new agreement with Energean Israel Ltd. (hereinafter – “Energean”), which was signed in December 2017. According to the new agreement, Energean will supply up to 13 BCM of natural gas over a period of 15 years, amounting to about $1.9 billion. Energean holds licenses for development of the Karish and Tanin gas reservoirs, which are located in Israel’s territorial waters. Supply of the natural gas is expected to commence, at the earliest, in the first half of 2021, depending on completion of the development and commencement of production of natural gas from the reservoirs, and will be used for running ICL’s factories and power stations in Israel. In November 2018, following the completion of Energean's Financial Closing, all precedent conditions for the closing of the agreement have been met.
(8)The Articles of Association of the Company and its Israeli subsidiaries include provisions that permit exemption, indemnification and insurance of the liability of officers, all in accordance with the provisions of the Israeli Companies Law.

The Company, with the approval of the Audit Committee, the Board of Directors and the General Meeting of the shareholders, granted its officers an exemption and letters of indemnification, and has also taken outhas an insurance policy covering directors and officers. The insurance and the indemnity do not apply to those cases specified in Section 263 of the Israeli Companies Law. The exemption relates to damage caused and/or will be caused, by those officers as a result of a breach of the duty of care to the Company. Commencing from the date of registration of the Company’s shares for trading in the United States, theThe amount of the indemnification payable by the Company under the letter of indemnification, in addition to amounts received from an insurance company, if any, for all of the officers on a cumulative basis, for one or more of the events detailed therein, wasis limited to $350 million ($300 million up to the date of registration of the Company’s shares for trading in the United States).million. The insurance is renewed annually.

(4)Several Group companies in Israel have signed agreements with various natural gas vendors for the supply of natural gas
F - 84

Notes to the Group’s manufacturing facilities in Israel. The Company committed to “take or pay’’ with respect to a minimum annual quantity of gas in a scope and in accordance with the mechanism provided in the agreements. The total quantities under the currently existing agreements should provide the Group all its gas needs up to September 30, 2017, including the quantities required to test and operate the power station located in Sodom, which commenced running on gas, on a partial basis, in January 2017. Transition to full use of gas is expected to take place in the second quarter of 2017. The supply period of the gas pursuant to the existing agreements ends on September 30, 2017.

The Company anticipates that the scope of the annual gas consumption, after operation of the power station,Consolidated Financial Statements as is expected to be received based on the Yam Thetys agreement and the Tamar agreement, will be about BCM 0.76.

at December 31, 2018

Note 20 - Commitments, Concessions and Contingent Liabilities (cont’d)

A.Commitments (cont’d)

(5)In 2012, the Company entered into agreements regarding a project to construct a new cogeneration power station in Sodom, Israel (hereinafter – the Station). The Station will have a production capacity of about 330 tons of steam per hour and about 230 megawatt hours, which will supply electricity and steam requirements for the production plants at the Sodom site and for third party customers. The Company intends to operate the new Station concurrently with the existing power station, which will be operated on a partial basis in a "hot back-up" format, for production of electricity and steam. The total electricity production in the short term will be about 245 megawatt hours. The Company also intends to utilize its present gas contracts and thereafter to enter into new gas contracts in order to run the Station.

Construction of the Station was expected to be completed in the second half of 2015. In 2015, the executing contractor (the Spanish Company "Abengoa") experienced financial difficulties. In October 2016, the Spanish court approved a debt arrangement between the executing contractor and its creditors which permits continuation of its activities in the power station project. In light of that stated, the Company expects to complete the construction and to commence operation of the Station in the first half of 2017, with additional costs that are not material.

B.Concessions

(cont'd)
B. Concessions
(1)Dead Sea Works Ltd. (hereinafter – DSW)

Pursuant to the Israeli Dead Sea Concession Law, 1961 (hereinafter –the– the Concession Law), as amended in 1986, and the concession deed attached as an addendum to the Concession Law, DSW was granted a concession to utilize the resources of the Dead Sea and to lease the land required for its plants in Sodom for a period that is expected to end on March 31, 2030, accompanied by a priority right to receive the concession after its expiration, should the Government wish to offer a new concession to a third party.

In 2015, the Minister of Finance appointed a team for determination ofto determine the “governmental activities to be conducted towards the end of the concession period”. The public’s comments in this matter were submitted to the team. Based on the interim report and its recommendations published in May 2018, and following a public hearing, on January 21, 2019, the Israeli Ministry of Finance released the final report of the inter-ministry team headed by Mr. Yoel Naveh, former Chief Economist, which includes a series of guidelines and recommendations regarding its positions and viewpoints in connection withthe actions that the government should take towards the end of the concession were submitted to the team. The team was asked to submit its recommendations to the Minister of Finance by May 2016, however to the best of the Company’s knowledge up toperiod. As at the date of the report, since the team had not yet submitted its recommendations. Therereport includes guiding principles and a recommendation to establish sub-teams to implement such principles, the Company is unable to assess, at this stage, the concrete implications, manner in which the recommendations would be implemented in practice and on which schedules. In addition, there is no certainty as to whathow the recommendations of this team will be regardingGovernment would interpret the procedures that the government will undertake in connection with the existing concessionConcession Law and as to the manner in which future mining rightsthis process and methodology would ultimately be implemented.
The Financial Statements were prepared under the assumption that DSW will be granted.

continue to operate the relevant assets for at least their remaining useful lives. In addition, the Financial Statements were prepared under the assumption that it is more likely than not that ICL will not sell DSW.

In addition, in 2015, the Minister of Finance appointed a team headed by the (former) Accountant General designated to establishevaluate the manner in which, according to the current concession, the replacement value of DSW’s tangible assets willwould be calculated in the event suchassuming that these assets arewould be returned to the government at the end of the concession period. The determination date of the actual calculation will be executedis only in 2030. As far as the Company is aware, this work has not yet been completed.
In December 2018, the Company received an opinion from an independent appraiser regarding the fair value of the property, plant and equipment of the subsidiaries Dead Sea Works, Dead Sea Bromine and Dead Sea Magnesium in Israel (hereinafter – the Subsidiaries). The teamOpinion was requested to submit its recommendationsprepared mainly for the Subsidiaries’ financial statements for 2016 and onward, which serve as a basis for the reports filed pursuant to the Ministerprovisions of Finance by March 2015.

the Taxation of Natural Resources Law. The Property, Plant and Equipment value provided in the opinion is based on the Replacement Cost methodology and is estimated at about $6 billion, as at December 31, 2015, and at December 31, 2016.

F - 85

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018
Note 20 - Commitments, Concessions and Contingent Liabilities (cont’d)

B.Concessions (cont’d)

B. Concessions (cont’d)
(1)(cont’d)Dead Sea Works Ltd. (hereinafter – DSW) (Cont’d)

In January 2017, the Accountant General sent a letter to the Chief Economist – the Supervisor of the State’s revenues wherein she noted that recently the position of the Division of the Accountant General in the Ministry of Finance regarding the arrangement covering

Though the assets was finalized (but was not published), however in lightassessed for tax purposes and the expected changeover ofassets that may be valuated under the Accountant General, the draft position report is being transferred to the incoming Accountant General for completion of the work. At this stage,Concession Law are highly correlated, there is no certainty regardingcomplete identity between them. The Company believes that the recommendations ofapplied Replacement Cost Methodology used in the new Accountant General. In addition, there is no certainty as to howopinion for estimating the Government will interpretfair value coincides with the methodology mentioned in the Concession Law for future valuation of the Property, Plant and Equipment upon termination of the concession period. Nevertheless, there could be other interpretations to the manner of implementation of the Concession Law’s provisions with respect to the valuation methodology, hence, the estimated value with respect to the Concession Law could materially differ from the value provided in which this processthe said opinion, even with respect to the same assets and methodology will ultimately be implemented, and howdates. It is expected that the value of the tangibleProperty, Plant and Equipment, at the end of the concession period, will change as time passes and as a result of purchase and disposal of assets will be calculated.

included in the future valuation.

In consideration of the concession, DSW pays royalties to the Government of Israel, calculated at the rate of about 5% of the value of the products at the factory gate, less certain expenses, where accordingexpenses. According to the salt harvesting agreement, which wasSalt Harvesting Agreement signed in July 2012 (hereinafter – the royalties rate SLA), in respect ofcase the annual quantity of chloride potash sold is in excess of 1.5 million tons istonnes, the royalties rate would be 10% (in place of 5%). In addition, according to the salt harvesting agreement,SLA states that if legislation is enacted that changes the specific fiscal policy in connection with profits or royalties deriving from the mining of quarries from the Dead Sea, the Company’s consent will not apply regardingto the increase inof the royalties’royalties' rate on the surplus quantities referred to above commencing fromwill not apply, after the date onenactment of the legislation, to the period in which such additional tax is collected as stated in the said legislation.
In November 2015,January 2016, the Economic Efficiency Law was published,for Taxation of Profits from Natural Resources, including implementation of the Sheshinski Committee’s recommendations, which address royalties and taxation of excess profits from Dead Sea minerals. The lawminerals (hereinafter – the Law), entered into effect on January 1,effect. Accordingly, the rate of the royalties' provision was updated to 5%. The Company's position, pursuant to the SLA and its arguments in the royalties' arbitration, is that increasing royalties at a rate exceeding 5% requires the Company's consent, which expired with the enactment of the Law. The State holds a different position regarding the royalties' rate in 2016.

Nevertheless, in the Company's estimation, in the event this matter would be challenged in arbitration, it is more likely than not that its claims regarding the royalties' rate increase, following the enactment of the Law in 2016, will be accepted.

DSW granted a sub-concessionsub‑concession to Dead Sea Bromine Ltd. (hereinafter – “the–the Bromine Company”)Company) to produce bromine and its compounds from the Dead Sea, the expiration date of which is concurrent with the DSW's concession. The royalties in respect of the products manufactured by the Bromine Company are received by DSW from the Bromine Company, and DSW then pays them over to the State.

In addition, there

F - 86

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018
Note 20 - Commitments, Concessions and Contingent Liabilities (cont’d)
B. Concessions (cont’d)
(1)   Dead Sea Works Ltd. (hereinafter – DSW) (Cont’d)
There is an arrangement relating to payment of royalties by Dead Sea Magnesium (hereinafter – “DSM”)DSM) for the production of metal magnesium by virtue of a specific arrangement with the State provided in the Government’s decision dated September 5, 1993. Pursuant to thethis arrangement, royalties are paid by DSM on the basis of carnallite used for production of magnesium. The arrangement with DSM provides that during 2006 the State may demand a reconsideration in connection with the amount of the royalties and the method orof their calculation for 2007 and thereafter. The State’s demand for reconsideration, as stated, was firstinitially received at the end of 2010, and the matter is presently in an arbitration proceeding, as described below.


Note 20 - Commitments, Concessions and Contingent Liabilities (cont’d)

B.Concessions (cont’d)

(1)(cont’d)

In 2007, a letter was received from the previousformer Accountant General of the Israeli Ministry of Finance, claiming an underpayment of royalties amounting to hundreds of millions of shekels. Pursuant to the concession, disputes between the parties, relating to the concession, including royalties, are to be decided by an arbitration panel of three arbitrators, (each side appoints an arbitrator and thesecomprising of two arbitrators appointed by each party, who in turn jointly appoint the third).

a third arbitrator.

In 2011, the arbitration proceeding commenced between the State of Israel and DSW, regarding the manner of calculation of the royalties under the concession and the royalties to be paid for magnesium metals and the paymentpayments or refunds (if any) due deriving from these matters.matters, if any. In the statement of claim filed by the State of Israel in the arbitration proceedings, the State of Israel is claiming the amount ofclaimed for $265 million in respect of underpayment of royalties for the years 2000 through 2009, with the addition of interest and linkage differences, and a change in the method of calculating the royalty payments from the sale of metal magnesium.

In 2014, a partial arbitration decision was received regarding the royalties’ issue. Based on the principles of the decision received,issue, whereby, DSW is also required to pay the State royalties on the sale of downstream products manufactured by companies that are controlled by ICL that have production plants located both in and outside of the Dead Sea area, including outside of Israel.
The royalties are to be paid according to the value of the downstream products, which will be set according to the formula described in Section 15(a)(2) of the Concession Deed, based on the selling price of the downstream products to unrelated third parties less the deductions set forth in subsections (I), (II) and (III) of that Section. Regarding metal magnesium, it was decided that the State of Israel and DSW are to exhaustconclude their discussions on the subject of the amount of the royalties to be paid by DSW on metal magnesium, and if no agreement is reached the matter is to be returned to arbitration. The arbitrators’ decision is partial
F - 87

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018
Note 20 - Commitments, Concessions and its main decision is with respect to payment of royalties on downstream products,Contingent Liabilities (cont’d)
B. Concessions (cont’d)
(1)   Dead Sea Works Ltd. (hereinafter – DSW) (Cont’d)
In 2016, as stated above.

As part of the second stage of the arbitration, which addressesaddressed the financial calculation principles, between September 2016 and January 2017, the arbitrators issued their decisions regarding the various issues relating to the financial calculations, as stated.

calculations. In November 2016,addition, the arbitrators'arbitrators issued their resolution regardingon the principles forof calculating the interest and linkage differences to be added to the principal amounts paid to the State of Israel, for the years 2000 through 2013. Accordingaccording to the said resolution,which, the calculation basis forof the principal amounts of the royalties paid for the said period should be on an NIS basis and accordingly, NIS interest and linkage differences apply as stipulated in the Israeli Interest and Linkage Law.

Based

In 2017, the State submitted a calculation, in the amount of about $120 million (before interest and linkage differences) relating to the years 2000 through 2014 reflecting, according to its contention, an additional amount of underpaid royalties. In October 2018, the arbitrators reached a decision resolving part of the remaining unresolved disputes, and on December 12, 2018, in accordance with the arbitrators' instructions, discussions were held between the State and the Company which resulted in a settlement agreement on a series of additional disputes that stated above,were left open at that time. On December 31, 2018, the settlement agreement was approved by the arbitrators. On January 14, 2019, the arbitrators' decision regarding the remaining unresolved disputes was rendered adopting the Company's position.
Following the arbitrators' decision in October 2018 and the settlement agreement abovementioned, the Company recorded an expense in its 2018 financial statement of $43 million (including interest and linkage), which was paid to the State. On January 10, 2019, the State sent a letter disputing the said payment and argued that there is a gap of about $30 million, between the amount paid and the State's view of the calculations. The disputed calculation is subject to the arbitrators' approval. In the Company's estimation, it is more likely than not that its approach to the calculations will be accepted. The Company is conducting discussions with the State in order to resolve all the remaining disputes. Considering the early stage of the discussions there is a difficulty in estimating whether they will mature into an agreement between the parties.
The total expensesexpense relating to the royalties' dispute, for the eighteen years between 2000 and 2017, recognized in the Company's financial statements commencing from 2014, regarding the royalties' dispute and coverageincluding payment of part of the State's legal expenses, is $170$208 million ($1333 million in 2016)2018) and $60$70 million within respect to theof interest and linkage differences ($2610 million in 2016)2018).


Note 20 - Commitments, Concessions

In 2018, 2017 and Contingent Liabilities (cont’d)

B.Concessions (cont’d)

(1)(cont’d)

In 2016, 2015 and 2014, DSW paid current royalties to the Government of Israel in the amounts of $53$66 million, $97$60 million, and $84$53 million, respectively. In addition, in 2015,2018, the Company paid an amount of $152$62 million, in respect of royalties relating to prior periods.

F - 88

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018
Note 20 - Commitments, Concessions and Contingent Liabilities (cont’d)
B. Concessions (cont’d)
(2)Rotem Amfert Ltd. (hereinafter – “Rotem”)

Rotem has been mining phosphates in the Negev in Israel for more than sixty years. The mining is conducted in accordance with the phosphate mining concessions, which are granted from time to time by the Minister of National Infrastructures, Energy and Water under the Mines Ordinance, throughby the Supervisor of Mines in his Office (hereinafter – ‘‘the Supervisor’’)Supervisor), accompanied byas well as the mining authorizations issued by the Israel Lands Authority (hereinafter – “the Authority”)the Authority).

The concessions relate to quarries (phosphate rock) whereas the authorizations cover use of land as active mining areas.

Mining Concessions

Rotem has the following mining concessions:

i.a)Rotem Field (including the Hatrurim Field) – valid up to the end of 2021.

ii.b)Zafir Field (Oron-Zin)(Oron‑Zin) – valid up to the end of 2021.

As at the date of this report, the company is working to extend the said concessions with the relevant authorities.
Mining royalties

Royalties

As part of the terms of the concessions in respect of mining of the phosphate, Rotem is required to pay the State of Israel royalties based on a calculation formatas stipulated in the Israeli Mines Ordinance. In January 2016, a legislative amendment entered into effect covering implementation of the recommendations of the Sheshinski Committee that changed the formatformula for the calculation of the royalties, increasedby increasing the rates from 2% to 5% of the value of the quarried material and left the Supervisor of Mines the possibility of collecting royalties at a higher rate if he decided to grant a mining right in a competitive process wherein one of the selection indices is the royalty rate.

In 2018, 2017 and 2016, Rotem paid royalties to the State of Israel in the amounts of $5 million, $4 million, and $5 million, respectively.
Planning and building

Building

The mining and quarrying activities require a zoning approval of the site based on a plan in accordance with the Israeli Planning and Building Law, 1965. These plans are updated, as needed, from time to time. As at the date of thethis report, there are various requests at different stages of deliberations pending before the planning authorities.

In November 2016, the District Board for the Southern District approved a detailed site plan for mining phosphate in the Zin-OronZin‑Oron area. This plan, which covers an area of about 350 square kilometers, will permit the continued mining of phosphate located in the Zin valley and in the Oron valley for a period of 25 years or up to exhaustion of the raw material – whichever occurs first, with the possibility for extension (under the authority of the District Planning Board).


F - 89

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018
Note 20 - Commitments, Concessions and Contingent Liabilities (cont’d)

B.
B. Concessions (cont’d)

(2)(cont’d)

Planning and building (cont’d)

(2)   Rotem Amfert Ltd. (hereinafter – “Rotem”) (Cont’d)
The Company is working to promote the plan for mining phosphates in Barir field (which is located in the southern part of South Zohar field) in the Negev Desert. In December 2015, the National Planning and Building Council (hereinafter – the National Council) approved the Policy Document regarding Mining and Quarrying of Industrial Minerals, (hereinafter – “the Policy Document”), which included among other things, a recommendation to permit phosphate mining in the Barir field. The Policy Document that was approved will serve as the basis for preparation of a national outline plan (hereinafter – “the National Outline Plan”) for mining and quarrying, which is also to be submitted for approval by the National Planning and Building Council. Along with the approval of the Policy Document, the National Planning and Building Council instructed the Planning Administration to raise the matter of the directive to prepare a detailed plan for the Barir Field at one of its upcoming meetings.

In the beginning of 2016, the National Outline Plan (NOP 14B), which includes the South Zohar field, was submitted for comments by the various committees, which provided their comments and recommendations toward the end of 2016. On February 14, 2017, a hearing was held by the Committee for Principle Planning Matters, whereat decisions were made with respectdecided to the continuedcontinue advancement of the mining in the South Zohar field. Concurrently, and based on a decision of the National Planning and Building Board,Council, instructions were prepared by the competent authorities with respect to the performance of an environmental survey of the Barir field for purposes of its further advancement. TheIn April 2017, the National Council recommended to the government to approve National Outline Plan (hereinafter – NOP 14B), which includes South Zohar field, and determined that Barir field will be advanced as part of a detailed National Outline Plan, which was approved by the government’s Housing Cabinet in January 2018.

In January 2018, the Minister of Health filed an appeal of the said instructions are expectedapproval, requiring compliance with the Ministry of Health’s recommendation to be broughtconduct a survey regarding the health impact in each site included in NOP 14B. As part of a discussion regarding the appeal, which was held in the Housing Cabinet, it was decided, with the consent of the Ministries of Health, Finance and Energy, to remove the appeal and to approve the NOP 14B. In addition, it was decided to establish a team with representatives of the ministries of Treasury, Health, Transportation, Environmental Protection and Energy, which will present to the Housing Cabinet a report that includes health aspects for approvalNOP 14B. In April 2018, the NOP 14B was formally published.
In July 2018, a petition was submitted to the Israeli Supreme Court of Justice by the municipality of Arad against the National Planning and Building Board during 2017.

Council, the Ministry of Health, the Ministry of Environmental Protection and Rotem, to revoke the approval of NOP 14B. In February 2016, the municipality of Arad, together with several other plaintiffs, includingJanuary 2019, residents of the town Arad, andBedouin diaspora in the communities and Bedouin villages surrounding the area, filed"Arad Valley" submitted a petition with the Israeli Supreme Court sitting asto the High Court of Justice (hereinafter – the Court) against approvalthe National Council, the Government of Israel and Rotem, in which the Court was requested to cancel the provisions of NOP 14B and the decision of the Policy Document that authorizedNational Council from December 5, 2017, regarding to the advancement of a detailed plan for phosphate mining in the South Zohar field duefield. In addition, the Court was requested to among other things,issue an interim injunction preventing the implementation of the NOP 14B instructions and the National Council's said decision until a fearfinal resolution. On January 22, 2019, the Supreme Court consolidated the hearing of potential environmental and health dangers they contend will occur. Rotem was joined as a respondent to the petition. In February 2017, the Company submitted a statement of defense. The Company estimates that the chances that the petition will be accepted are low. The Company believestogether with the other petition filed against NOP 14B and decided that the mining activities in South Zohar do not involve any risks to the environment or to people. There is no certainty that the National Outline Plan and the South Zohar plan will be approved at all, in light of, among other things, the opposing position of the Health Ministry. Moreover,this stage there is no certainty regardingbasis for granting the timelines forinterim injunction. On February 5, 2019, the submission of the plans, the approval thereof, or of further developments with respect to South Zohar. If mining approval is not received for South Zohar, there will be a significant impact on the Group’s future mining reserves in the medium and long term. The hearing in the High Court of Justice is scheduled to take place on March 20, 2017.

In 2016, 2015 and 2014, Rotem paid royaltiesCompany filed its response.

F - 90

Notes to the State of Israel in the amounts of $5 million, $4 million and $3 million, respectively.


Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018

Note 20 - Commitments, Concessions and Contingent Liabilities (cont’d)

B.Concessions (cont’d)

B. Concessions (cont’d)
(3)A subsidiary in Spain
A subsidiary in Spain (hereinafter – ICL Iberia) was granted mining rights based on legislation of Spain’s Government from 1973 and the regulations accompanying this legislation. Further to the legislation, as stated, the Government of the Catalonia region published special mining regulations whereby ICL Iberia received individual licenses for each of the 126 different sites that are relevant to the current and possible future mining activities. Some of the licenses are valid up to 2037 and the rest are effective up to 2067. The concession for the regulations accompanying this legislation. Further to the legislation, as stated, the Government of the Catalonia region published special mining regulations whereby ICL Iberia received individual licenses for each of the 126 different sites that are relevant to the current and possible future mining activities. Some of the licenses are valid up to 2037 while the rest are effective up to 2067. Regarding "Reserva Catalana", an additional site wherein mining has not yet been commenced, in 2007 a process was commenced for extension of the concession period, which ended in 2012, for an additional 30 years.

In light of the changeover of the governments in Spain, the administrative processes of the National Mining Authority with respect to extending the concession period have not yet been completed. As atcommenced, expired in 2012. The Company is acting in cooperation with the reporting date, ICL Iberia is inSpanish Government to obtain a renewal of the process of renewing the rights.concession. According to the Spanish authorities, the concession period is valid until a final decision is made regarding renewal of the concession period.

renewal.
(4)United Kingdom

A.The mining rights of a subsidiary in the United Kingdom (hereinafter – ICL UK)Boulby), are based on approximately 114 mining leases and licenses for extracting various minerals, in addition to numerous easements and rights of way from private owners of land under which ICL UKBoulby operates, and mining rights inunder the North Sea granted by the British Crown (Crown Estates)., which includes provisions to explore and exploit the resources of the Polysulphate mineral. The said mining rights cover a total area of about 374 square kilometers. As at the date of thethis report, all the lease periods, licenses, easements and rights of way are effective – some of the said periods will continue up to 2020 whereas some will continue up tountil 2038. In 2016,2018 and 2017, the mining royalties amounted to $3 million.$1.3 million and $2 million, respectively.

B.A UK subsidiary from ICL Specialty FertilizersInnovative Ag Solutions segment (hereinafter – Everris UK), has peat mines in the UK (Creca, Nutberry and Douglas Water). Peat is used as a raw material for production of detached beds for soil improvement and use as soil substitutes in growing media.
The Nutberry and Douglas Water mining sites are owned by Everris UK, while the Creca mine is held under a long-termlong‑term lease. The mining permits are granted by the local authorities and are renewed after examination of the local authorities. The mining permits were granted up to the end of 2024.

(5)YPH JV holds two phosphate mining licenses that were issued in July 2015 by the Division of Land and Resources of the Yunnan district in China. With reference to the Haikou Mine (hereinafter – Haikou), the mining license is valid up to January 2043, whereas regarding the Baitacun Mine (hereinafter - Baitacun), the mining license is valid up to November 2018. YPH JV is expected to request a renewal of the Baitacun concession prior to its expiration date. Nevertheless, in the foreseeable future the Company does not plan to carry out a mining operation in Baitacun.China

YPH JV holds two phosphate mining licenses that were issued in July 2015, by the Division of Land and Resources of the Yunnan district in China. With reference to the Haikou Mine (hereinafter – Haikou), the mining license is valid up to January 2043, whereas regarding the Baitacun Mine (hereinafter – Baitacun), the mining license expired in November 2018. The mining activities at Haikou are carried out in accordance with the above‑mentioned license. Regarding Baitacun, the Company is examining the option to renew the concession, subject to the phosphate reserves soil survey results and achieving the required understanding with the authorities.
F - 91

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018
Note 20 - Commitments, Concessions and Contingent Liabilities (cont’d)

B.Concessions (cont’d)

B. Concessions (cont’d)
(5)(cont’d)China (cont'd)

Acquisition of mining rights

According to the Mining Concession Grant Contract of Haikou, which was signed in November 2012 between YPC (the prior owners of the rights in the mine), and the Land and Resources Department of Yunnan Province (together with its local equivalent – "the Resources Department"). The mining rights relating to Baitacun were also previously owned by YPC. However, YPC did not enter into a concession agreement covering these rights that were received prior to publication of the relevant PRC laws requiring the Resources Department to sign such an agreement. As part of formation of YPH JV, in October 2015, the mining rights related to Haikou and Baitacun were transferred to YPH JV.

Renewal of Mining License

In order to retain the Haikou and Baitacun mining licenses, YPH JV must comply with the provisions of the relevant Chinese laws and regulations regarding mining activities. In particular, YPH JV is required to conduct an annual examination with regard to its mining licenses. The items to be examined in the annual examination mainly include the following issues: whether the taxes, fees and premiums relating to the mining licenses and mining activities conducted by the company have been paid in full; whether the annual reserves report (as applicable) has been submitted; whether various mining parameters have met the standards required by law; whether land reclamation has been conducted; and whether any sanctions have been imposed on the company or there are violations of laws by the company. In addition, YPH JV has to submit the renewal application to the Resources Department 30 days prior to expiration of the applicable mining license.

Natural Resources Tax

Royalties

With respect to the mining rights, up to July 2016, YPH JV was required to payin accordance with the authorities a “Mineral Resources Compensation Fee” at the rate of 2% of YPH JV’s revenues from sales of phosphate rock mined. In addition, YPH JV was required to pay a “Resource Tax”, of 15 yuan per tonne of YPH JV’s phosphate rock mined from the mines. Commencing from July 2016, the new Natural"Natural Resources Tax Law (hereinafter – “the Law”) entered into effect, which includes phosphate rock. Pursuant to the Law, instead of 15 yuan as stated above,Law", YPH JV will pay taxroyalties of 8% ofon the selling price based on the market price of the rock prior to its processing. In addition, as part of the Law, the “Mineral Resources Compensation Fee” at the rate of 2% was cancelled, this being from the effective date of the Law.

In light of that stated above, in 2016,2018 and 2017, YPH JV paid $6 million.


Note 20 - Commitments, Concessionsroyalties in the amount of $3 million and Contingent Liabilities (cont’d)

B.Concessions (cont’d)

(5)(cont’d)

$2 million, respectively.

Grant of Mining Rights to Lindu

In February 2016, YPC issued a statement whereby in 2010 YPC entered into agreements with the local authority of Jinning County, Yunnan Province and Jinning Lindu Mining Development and Construction Co. Ltd. (“(hereinafter - Lindu Company”)Company), according to which Lindu Company is permitted to mine up to two million tonstonnes of phosphate rock from a certain area measuring 0.414 square kilometers within the area of the Haikou mine (hereinafter - “the– the Daqing Area”)Area) and to sell such phosphate rock to any third party in its own discretion.

Prior to the establishment of YPH JV, YPC proposed to the local authority of Jinning County and Lindu Company to swap the rights granted to Lindu Company in the Daqing Area with another area that is not a part of the Haikou mine, andwhere Lindu Company will mine in that area.would mine. In March 2016, in a meeting held between YPC, ICL and other relevant parties, YPC stated that it could not exchange its other mines to replace the Daqing Area since Lindu Company’s benefit is connected to the Daqing Area. Under the above above‑mentioned statement, YPC has undertaken that YPH JV’s mining right in the Haikou mine will not be adversely affected by the above-mentioned arrangements regarding Lindu Company’s mining rights within the Daqing Area. At YPH’s Board meeting held in November 2016, itarrangements. It was decided that YPH should conduct further communications with YPC and Lindu Company, for the purpose of protecting YPH’sits legal rights and to urge the parties to reach a fair, just, and reasonable solution to this issue, as soon as possible.

C.Contingent liabilities

F - 92

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018
Note 20 - Commitments, Concessions and Contingent Liabilities (cont’d)
C. Contingent liabilities
(1)Ecology

A.During the 1990s, several Group subsidiaries were sued by plaintiffs from various countries who worked mostly as banana plantation workers and who allege to have been injured by exposure to Di Bromo Chloropropane (‘‘DBCP’’), which was produced, many years ago by a number of manufacturers, including large chemical companies. As at the date of the report, the Group’s subsidiaries are parties to one legal proceeding by 9 plaintiffs who are requesting certification of their claim as a class action. The claim is for bodily injury and, therefore, the amount of the claim has not been stated. In the opinion of the Company, it is not possible, at this stage, to estimate the outcome of the above claim due to its complexity and the multiple parties involved. However, the Company believes that the chances that the plaintiffs’ contentions will be accepted are lower than the chances they will be rejected.

B.In June 2015, a request was filed for certification of a claim as a class action, in the District Court in Tel-Aviv–Tel‑Aviv–Jaffa, against eleven defendants, including a subsidiary, Fertilizers and Chemical Ltd., in respect of claims relating to air pollution in Haifa Bay and for the harm allegedly caused from it to the residents of the Haifa Bay area. The amount of the claim is about NIS 13.4 billion (about $3.5 billion). In the Company’s estimation, based on the factual material provided to it and the relevant court decision, it is more likely than not that the plaintiffs’ contentions will be rejected.

B.In connection with the 2017 event of the partial collapse of the dyke in Pond 3, which is used for accumulation of phosphogypsum water that is created as part of the production processes in Rotem plants in Israel, the Company is taking action to rectify environmental impacts caused to the Ashalim Stream and its surrounding area, to the extent required. The Company’s actions are being carried out in full coordination and close cooperation with the Israeli environmental authorities. The Company is committed to the matter of environmental protection, and for years has worked closely with the Israeli environmental protection authorities to maintain the Negev’s natural reserves in the area of its facilities. As at the date of this report, the event is being investigated by the Ministry of Environmental Protection and the Nature and Natural Parks Authority. In 2017, the Company recognized restoration costs, in immaterial amounts, that were incurred in the short term. Several applications for certification of claims as class actions were filed against the Company (see item C below) contending, among others, that the Company should bear the restoration costs in the long‑term. In light of the complexity of the process and the uncertainty regarding the final restoration plans to be determined by the relevant authorities, the Company is unable at this stage to estimate the expected costs of the restoration work, as stated. The Company is in contact with its insurance carriers to activate the insurance policies in respect of the matters described above.
Relating to the active gypsum Pond 5 in Rotem Amfert plants in Israel, and the process of obtaining a permit for its operation, in January 2018, an appeal was filed by Adam Teva V’Din - Israeli Association for Environmental Protection (hereinafter - ATD) to the District Planning and Building Appeals Committee of the Southern District (hereinafter – the Appeals Committee) against the Local Council and Rotem, in connection with the decision of the Local Committee from December 2017, to dismiss ATD’s objection to approval of the leniency and issuance of a building permit for Pond 5. In light of the Appeals Committee's dismissal of ATD's said claims, in May 2018 ATD filed an administrative petition against the Appeal Committee requesting the Court to order that: (1) the Appeals Committee's ruling is void, as well as any permit issued by virtue thereof; (2) the “relief” in implementation of the outline plan applying to the region, as provided in the Appeals Committee ruling, constitutes a breach of the provisions of the outline plan applying to the region; and (3) the Local Committee shall act to enforce the law and abstain from further planning procedures and permits until such enforcement actions are taken.
F - 93

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018
Note 20 - Commitments, Concessions and Contingent Liabilities (cont’d)

C. Contingent liabilities (cont’d)
(1)Ecology (cont'd)
B.(cont’d)
On October 11, 2018, the Court approved a settlement agreement between ATD and the Company, the main points of which are: withdrawing the abovementioned petition, in return for a re-deliberation of the Appeals Committee on its decision regarding the implementation of the relief for obtaining building permits for the operation of Pond 5 and future restoration of Ponds 1-4. On October 24, 2018, the Appeals Committee approved the issuing of the building permits for the operation of Pond 5, until the date of December 31, 2020. In November 2018, the building and use permits for Pond 5 were received. The Company is working with the relevant authorities to obtain all the required permits, for the continued operation of the gypsum ponds beyond 2020, and this is in accordance with the requirements set by law and/or instructions of the Planning and Building Committee.
C.Contingent liabilities (cont’d)In July and August 2017, three applications for certification of claims as class actions were filed against the Company, as a result of a partial collapse of the dyke in the evaporation pond of Rotem Amfert Israel, which caused contamination of the Ashalim Stream and its surrounding area. The claimants contend that the Company breached various provisions of the environmental laws, including, the provisions of the Law for Prevention of Environmental Hazards, the Water Law as well as provisions of the Torts Ordinance, breach of a statutory duty and negligence. In the framework of the first application, the Court was requested to instruct the Company to rectify the harm caused as a result of its omissions in order to prevent recurrence of the damage caused as well as to grant a monetary remedy for non‑pecuniary damages. The monetary remedy was not defined, however, according to the claimants, the amount of the personal claim is NIS 1,000 ($267) for each resident of the State of Israel, which totals approximately 8.68 million persons. In the framework of the second application, the Court was requested to grant a monetary remedy in an amount of no less than NIS 250 million ($67 million), and concurrently to award personal compensation in the amount of NIS 2,000 ($534) for each resident of the State of Israel, this being in respect of non‑pecuniary damages. Furthermore, the Court was requested to instruct the Company to comply with the relevant laws and the rules provided thereunder. As part of the third application, the Court was requested to instruct the Company, among other things, to prepare plans for removal of the pollution, restoration of the Ashalim Stream and its surrounding area, for control and prevention of recurrence of the damage caused, to pay monetary relief to the class of injured parties, in the amount of NIS 202.5 million ($54 million), and to provide compensation by means of restoring the natural values impaired and returning the area to its former condition. On May 1, 2018, the Nature and Parks Authority (hereinafter – NPA) filed a motion with the Be’er Sheva District Court to strike the three applications mentioned above as, according to NPA, it is the entity most suitable to serve as the representative plaintiff in a class action in this regard.

F - 94

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018
Note 20 - Commitments, Concessions and Contingent Liabilities (cont’d)
C. Contingent liabilities (cont’d)
(1)Ecology (cont'd)
Concurrently, NPA filed an application for certification of a class action against the Company, Rotem and past and present officers of the Company and Rotem (jointly hereinafter - the Respondents), with respect to the Ashalim incident. According to NPA, the Respondents, jointly and/or severally, are liable for compensation due to the Ashalim incident, among other things by virtue of torts law and/or unjust enrichment law and by virtue of any other law. In the Application, the Court was requested, among other things, to issue orders the purpose of which is to take all necessary measures to prevent the recurrence of the environmental hazard, and also to cooperate with NPA and the State's authorities in order to minimize the ecological and environmental damage and see to the restoration of the nature reserve. Furthermore, the Court was requested to grant monetary relief to the public injured by the ecological and environmental damage, and to grant a monetary relief for the purpose of the restoration of the nature reserve, in the aggregate amount of NIS 397 million (about $106 million).
In October 2018, the Company was notified that all four applicants had agreed to join efforts and manage the class actions in a joint and coordinated manner. Consequently, in November 2018, the parties have informed the Court of their consent to take part in a mediation process in an attempt to resolve the disputes outside of court. In February 2019, the mediation process was initiated. As at the reporting date, considering the early stage of the proceedings, there is a difficulty in estimating their outcome.
In May 2018, the Company was served with a motion for discovery and perusal of documents (hereinafter – the Motion), filed with the Tel Aviv District Court, by a shareholder of the Company (hereinafter – the Movant), as a preliminary proceeding in preparation for the possible filing of an application for certification of a multiple derivative action against officers of the Company and Rotem who, according to the Movant, caused the alleged damages incurred and to be incurred by the Company as a result of the Ashalim incident. In August 2018, the Company submitted its position to the Court. In December 2018, the parties reached an arrangement, according to which, the said legal proceedings will be held until the relevant investigation's materials will be provided to Rotem.
D.In March 2018, an application for certification of a claim as a class action was filed with the District Court in Be’er Sheva by two groups: the first class constituting the entire public in the State of Israel and the second class constituting visitors of Bokek stream and the Dead Sea (hereinafter – the Applicants), against the subsidiaries, Rotem Amfert Negev Ltd. and Periclase Dead Sea Ltd. (hereinafter – the Respondents).
According to the claim, the Respondents have allegedly caused continuous, severe and extreme environmental hazards through pollution of the “Judea group – Zafit formation” groundwater aquifer (hereinafter – the Aquifer) and the Ein Bokek spring with industrial wastewater, and in doing so the Respondents have violated various provisions of property law and environmental protection law, including the provisions of the Law for Prevention of Environmental Hazards and the Water Law, as well as violations relating to the Torts Ordinance – breach of statutory duty, negligence and unjust enrichment.
F - 95

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018
Note 20 - Commitments, Concessions and Contingent Liabilities (cont’d)
C. Contingent liabilities (cont’d)
(1)Ecology (cont'd)
D.(cont’d)

The

As a result, the Court was requested to order the Respondents to eliminate the proprietary violation in reference to the Aquifer and Bokek stream by restoration thereof and to pay the public compensation in an estimated amount of NIS 1.4 billion (about $410 million). As at the claim is about $3.8 billion. A preliminary hearing ondate of the report, considering the early stage of the proceeding and due to unprecedented issues, that arise from the request, was scheduled for April 30, 2017. In the Company’s estimation, based on the factual material provided to it and the relevant court decision,there is a difficulty in estimating the chances that the plaintiffs’ contentions will be rejected are greater than the chances theyapplication will be accepted.

E.In October 2018, an application for certification of a class action was filed with the Beer Sheva Magistrate Court against Dead Sea Works Ltd. and Dead Sea Bromine Company Ltd., with respect to a bromine leak that occurred in June 2018, within the premises of Dead Sea Works. According to the plaintiff, the alleged air pollution caused an environmental hazard and a health risk to passersby and to those present in the vicinity of the plant, as well as in the settlements Neot Hakikar and Ein Tamar, and the blocking of Route 90. According to the statement of claim, the Court is requested to award compensation for the alleged damages, in the total amount of about NIS 1.5 million (about $0.4 million). In December 2018, the parties signed a settlement agreement at immaterial amounts to conclude the application proceeding for certification of a class action. The agreement is subject to the Court's approval.
(2)Increase in level of Pond 5 (hereinafter – “the Pond”)the Pond)

The minerals from the Dead Sea are extracted by way of solar evaporation, whereby salt precipitates onto the bed of one of the evaporation ponds at Sodom (Pond 5), in one of the sites of Dead Sea Works (hereinafter – “DSW”)DSW). The precipitated salt creates a layer on the Pond bed of approximately 20 million tonstonnes annually. The process of production of the raw material requires that a fixed brine volume is preserved in the Pond. To this end, the watersolutions level of the Pond is raised by approximately 20 centimeters annually.

each year according to the rate at which the pool floor rises.

The Ein Boqeq and Hamei Zohar hotels, the townsettlement of Neve Zohar and other facilities and infrastructures are located on the western beach of the Pond. Raising the water level of the Pond above a certain level is likely to cause structural damage to the foundations and the hotel buildings situated close to the water’s edge, to the settlement of Neve Zohar and to other infrastructures located along the western shoreline of the Pond. This situation requires establishment of defenses for the facilities and infrastructures of the hotels located on the shores of the Pond.

F - 96

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018
Note 20 - Commitments, Concessions and Contingent Liabilities (cont’d)
C. Contingent liabilities (cont’d)
(2)Increase in level of Pond 5 (hereinafter – the Pond) (cont'd)
The project for construction of the temporarycoastline defenses with respect to the hotels and infrastructures on the coastline of the Pond has been underway for several years. As part of such defenses, from time to time, the dyke along the western beachfront of the Pond, across from the hotels, is raised, together with, in many places, a system for lowering subterranean water. As at the date of the report, the construction work with respect to the hotels coastline is complete, and the related dykes have been raised to accommodate the maximal brine level (15.1 meters). The current brine level is 14.6 meters. Nevertheless, there is additional ongoing work on raising the roads level along pond 5.
There is an agreement between DSW and the Government of Israel that the Company will bear 39.5% of the costs of financing the temporarycoastline defenses and the Government will finance the balance thereof.

The interim defenses have not yet been fully completed, however the dykes have been raised to a level that permits raising of the water level up to a height of 15.1 meters, subject to approval of the plenary Committee for National Infrastructures, in a number of phases, on the way to the final raising.

In July 2012, an agreement was signed with the Government of Israel, regarding "Execution and Funding of the Dead Sea Protection Project and Increase of the Royalties Paid to the State" (hereinafter – "thethe Salt Harvesting Project")Project). The purpose of the Salt Harvesting Project is to provide a permanent solution for the raising of the water level in the Pond and stabilizing of the water therein at a fixed level by harvesting of the salt from this pond and transferring it to the Northern Basin of the Dead Sea.


Note 20 - Commitments, Concessions and Contingent Liabilities (cont’d)

C.Contingent liabilities (cont’d)

(2)(cont’d)

The highlights of the agreement are set forth below:

a.The planning and execution of the Salt Harvesting Project will be performed by DSW.

b.The Salt Harvesting Project as well as the project for the new pumping station that is to be constructed (hereinafter – the P-9 Pumping Station), constitute an Israeli national infrastructure project that will be promoted by the Israeli Committee for National Infrastructures.

c.
Starting from January 1, 2017, the water level in the pond will not rise above 15.1 meters in DSW’s network (about 390 meters below sea level). DSW will be required to pay compensation in respect of any damages caused, if at all, as a result of a rise of the water level beyond the level determined. In the case of a material deviation from the timetables for the execution of the Salt Harvesting Project as a result of a requirement for changes by the planning institutions, as a result of which the Plan is not approved on time, or due to a decision of a judicial tribunal that caused a delay of at least one year in provision of effect to the Salt Harvesting Project by the planning institutions, without the Company having violated its obligations, the Company will be permitted to request raising of the water level above that stated above.

In


F - 97

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 2015, National Infrastructures Plan 35A (hereinafter31, 2018
Note 20 - the Plan), was approved by the National Infrastructures Committee, which includes the statutory infrastructure of the Salt Harvesting project in the evaporation ponds through, among other things, the construction of a new pumping station in the northern basin of the Dead Sea. In March 2016, the Government also approved the Plan.

Commitments, Concessions and Contingent Liabilities (cont’d)
C. Contingent liabilities (cont’d)
(2)Increase in level of Pond 5 (hereinafter – the Pond) (cont'd)
d.
Increase in the rate of the royalties from 5% to 10% of sales, for quantities of chloride potash DSW sells in excess of 1.5 million tonstonnes annually. This increase applies to sales starting January 1, 2012. In addition, in respect of the period January 1, 2010 through January 1, 2012, the Company agreed to an additional royalty charge, at the rate of 5%, only on annual sales exceeding 3.0 million tons.

e.In July 2012, as part of the agreement, the Government committed that at this time it sees no need to make additional changes to its specific fiscal policy regarding mining from the quarries at the Dead Sea, including the commercial utilization thereof and, accordingly, at this time, it will not initiate and will even object to, as applicable, proposed laws regarding this matter. The Company’s consent to the increase of the rate of the royalties as stated in d. above, is contingent on implementation of the Government of Israel’s decision, as stated in this section. The agreement further provides that if legislation is enacted that changes the specific fiscal policy in connection with profits or royalties deriving from mining of quarries from the Dead Sea, the Company’s consent will not apply regarding increase in the rate of royalties on the surplus quantities referred to above, commencing from the date on which additional tax is collected as pursuant to the said legislation.decision.


Note 20 - Commitments, Concessions and Contingent Liabilities (cont’d)

C.Contingent liabilities (cont’d)

(2)(cont’d)

The agreement further provides that if legislation is enacted that changes the specific fiscal policy in connection with profits or royalties deriving from mining of quarries from the Dead Sea, the Company’s consent to the increase of royalties' rate on the surplus quantities referred to above will not apply, after the enactment of the legislation, to the period in which such additional tax is collected as stated in the said legislation. In November 2015,January 2016, the Economic Efficiency Law was published, including implementationfor Taxation of Profits from Natural Resources, which includes the Sheshinski Committee’s recommendations whichthat address royalties and taxation of excess profits from Dead Sea minerals. The lawminerals (hereinafter – the Law), entered into effect on January 1, 2016.

effect. Accordingly, the rate of the royalties' provision was update to 5%. For further information, see item B(1) above.

The Company will bear 80% and the Government will bear 20% of the cost of the Salt Harvesting Project, however the Government's share will not exceed NIS 1.4 billion.

In 2015 and in 2016, the National Infrastructures Committee and the Israeli Government, respectively, approved National Infrastructures Plan 35A (hereinafter – the Plan), which includes the statutory infrastructure for establishment of the Salt Harvesting Project in Pond 5, and construction of the P-9 pumping station in the northern basin of the Dead Sea. As at the date of the report, the building permits for the Salt Harvesting Project and the P-9 pumping station have been received and the construction work has commenced. The P-9 pumping station is expected to commence its operations during 2020. For further information see item A above relating commitments.
F - 98

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018
Note 20 - Commitments, Concessions and Contingent Liabilities (cont’d)
C. Contingent liabilities (cont’d)
(3)Spain

A. The subsidiary in Spain (hereinafter – "ICL Iberia") has two potash production centers – Suria and Sallent. As part of the efficiency plan, the Company intends to consolidate the activities of ICL Iberia onto

A.The subsidiary in Spain (hereinafter – ICL Iberia) has two potash production centers – Suria and Sallent. As part of the efficiency plan, the Company intends to consolidate the activities of ICL Iberia into one site by means of expanding the Suria production site and discontinuing the mining activities on the Sallent site. The mining activities in Spain require an environmental mining license and an urban license.
Sallent site
Environmental mining license and an urban license.

Sallent site – in 2013, the Spanish Regional Court issued a judgment invalidating ICL Iberia's environmental mining license, contending that there were defectsflaws in provision of the license by the Government of Catalonia.Catalonia including no environmental impact assessment of the Cogulló salt deposit (hereinafter - the salt pile). In September 2015, the Spanish Supreme Court affirmed this judgment.

Following the Company’s request and as part of the Company’s effort to obtain the environmental mining license, in August 2017, the Mining Authorities issued a new environmental mining license, which includes a new environmental impact assessment approved by the Environmental Authorities. The environmental mining license replaces definitively the license previously invalidated and accordingly ICL Iberia is allowed to continue its activity.
Urban license – in 2014, the District Court of Barcelona determined that the urban license was not valid. In 2014,January 2017, the Regional Court also invalidatedaffirmed this judgment. An appeal process was conducted before the Supreme Court. Following the resolution, the municipality of Sallent initiated a protection case relating to urban planning legality and the Company was required to legalize its salt pile activity by obtaining the urban license. In July 2018, the City Council issued the urban license contending thatto the license does not comply with the required conditions for piling up salt on the site (a by-productCompany.
As part of enforcement of the potash production process). In connection with the validity of the urban license, after issuance of the decision of the Supreme Court,judgement, the local planning board (CUCC) of the Catalonian government (CUCC) determined new provisions, which became effective upon the Supreme Court's approval in November 2015, including,include limitation ofover the height of the salt pile of up to 538 meters and a temporary extension of the salt piling activities up to the earlier of June 30, 2017 or when the salt pile reaches a height of about 538 meters. As atactivity. The Company received the date ofCUCC's approval to continue piling up the report,salt up to June 30, 2019, and the height of the salt pile is 509514 meters. In light of the said restrictions, continuation of the production activities on the Sallent site is contingent on finding a solution for treating the salt pile and the salt produced as part of the ongoing potash production process.

In November 2015, ICL Iberia signed a memorandum agreement for joint cooperation with the Government of Catalonia (hereinafter – “the Agreement”) that defines ICL Iberia’s activities in the country as preferential activities and the potash industry as a strategic public interest. The purpose of the agreement is, among other things, to arrange ICL Iberia's obligation to remove the salt pile on the Sallent site, including completion of the restoration plan of the site (see below) – all of which is to be completed no later than 2070 (removal of the salt pile is to be completed by 2065).


Note 20 - Commitments, Concessions and Contingent Liabilities (cont’d)

C.Contingent liabilities (cont’d)

(3)(cont’d)

At the end of 2016, a preliminary draft of the agreement was provided by the Government of Catalonia to all the parties involved for their comments. In February 2017, ICL Iberia submitted a request for approval of additional alternative solutions regarding the manner of handling the salt pile and extension of the period of the activities on the Sallent site beyond June 30, 2017. As at the date of the report, ICL Iberia's environmental mining license, had not yet been renewed by the Government of Catalonia.

Suria site – in
In April 2014, after a favorable survey was received from the Environmental Protection Authority in Catalonia, ICL Iberia received an environmental license that complies with the new environmental protection regulations in Spain (autoritzacio substantive), this being after ICL Iberia received the urban license.

Recently, it became clear that a number of technical problems found in the project with respect

F - 99

Notes to the access tunnel to the Cabanasas mine (which is located on the Suria site) could delay its completion date. The Company is examining a number of alternatives for treatmentConsolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018
Note 20 - Commitments, Concessions and removal of the salt from this site.

Contingent Liabilities (cont’d)

C. Contingent liabilities (cont’d)
(3)Spain (cont'd)
Restoration plan – in
In 2015, in accordance with the provisions of the Spanish Environmental Protection Law,Waste Management regulation, ICL Iberia submitted to the Government of CatalonaCatalonia a mining site restoration plan for the two production sites Suria and Sallent, which includes among other things, a plan for handling the salt piles and dismantling of facilities. The restoration plan for the Suria site is scheduled to run up to 2094, whereas the restoration plan for the Sallent site is scheduled to run up to 2070. During 2016, in light of talks held withIn June 2018, the authorities in connection withnew restoration plan was approved.
Regarding the plan for treating the salt pile on the Sallent site, it was found that a number of changes in the plan are required with respect to the water pumping process, which constitutes part of the removal plan.

As a result of that stated above, based on an updated estimateestimation of the projected costs for the closure and restoration of the Sallent site, as part of the restoration solution, the Company recognizedis taking action to utilize the salt for production and sale as a provisionproduct in its financial statements for 2016the De-icing business. In light of changes in respectmarket conditions, mainly in the future selling prices of the historical waste treatment costs,said product, the Company updated its provision in the amount of $40$18 million, under "other expenses" in the “other expenses” category.

Statement of Income.

Note 20 - Commitments, Concessions

The provision is based on a long‑term forecast, covering a period of more than 50 years, along with observed estimates and, Contingent Liabilities (cont’d)

C.Contingent liabilities (cont’d)

(3)(cont’d)

accordingly, the final amount that will be required to restore the Sallent site could change, even significantly, from the amount of the present provision. In the Company’s estimation, the provision in its books reflects the best estimate of the expense required to settle this obligation.
B.In January
Further to the court decision received in 2016 following complaints from competitors in the salt market in Spain, the European Commission announcedproviding that it will investigate whether ICL Iberia received illegal aid from the Spanish authorities regarding two issues:

(1)Whether the guarantee amounts relating to environmental protection (the guarantees that are supposed to cover the potential cost of rehabilitation of the land), which were originally set at $2 million, are lower than the amount required by the EU and the national and regional environmental rules; and

(2)Whether ICL Iberia should bear the cost of the environmental protection measures, in the amount of about $9 million, which was financed by the Spanish authorities.

The Company disagrees with the above claims and given the preliminary stage of these proceedings, the legal measures that need to be taken are still being examined. However, in the Company’s estimation, based on its preliminary discussions with the Spanish authorities, the chances that the above claims will be rejected are higher than the chances that they will be accepted.

C.In the second half of 2016, a court decisions was rendered whereby ICL Iberia is solely responsiblebears sole responsibility for contamination of the water in certain wells on the Suria siteand Sallent sites (due to an excessover concentration of salt) and, therefore,, in January 2018, claims were received from several owners of the land surrounding the wells, whereby ICL Iberia is required to compensate them for their damages, in the aggregate amount of $22 million. In the Company's estimation, it is liable for repair ofmore likely than not that it will be required to compensate the damages. As a result, based on management's estimate, the Company recorded a provision in its financial statements for 2016,owners in the amount of about $11 $12 million. Accordingly, in 2017 a provision was recorded.

(4)Haifa Chemicals acquires potash from DSW as partIn December 2018, an application for certification of its manufacturing inputs. In accordancea class action was filed with the agreement between DSWTel Aviv District Court against the Company, Israel Corporation, and Haifa Chemicals,office holders, including directors who held office during the pricesaid dates which Haifa Chemicals was charged was according to the average FOB price of DSW to its two largest customersare stated in the prior quarter. In 2008, the agreement between Haifa Chemicals and DSW was cancelled and the parties did not succeed in reaching a new agreement. Haifa Chemicals contends that DSW’s price for the potash is not fair and it is not able to operate at this price level. In May 2009, an arbitration proceeding between the parties commencedapplication, with respect to the price ofmanner in which the potash.IT (the Harmonization) project was managed and terminated. According to the allegations made in the Application, the Company failed to properly report negative developments which occurred on certain dates during the said IT project whose failure caused the company immense financial damages.

In October 2016, following discussions aimed at settling the disputes and demands between DSW and Haifa Chemicals, a final arbitration decision ending the arbitration was rendered – with the consent of both parties. All past disputes and legal claims currently pending between the parties relating

F - 100

Notes to the principal arbitration award rendered in 2014 and referring to potash sales for the years 2009 to 2016, inclusive, will be dismissed. Set forth below are the highlights of the decision:

a.The arbitration award will be effective for thirteen years, commencing from January 1, 2017, and ending on December 31, 2029 (hereinafter – “the Arbitration Award Period”).
Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018

Note 20 - Commitments, Concessions and Contingent Liabilities (cont’d)

C.Contingent liabilities (cont’d)

C. Contingent liabilities (cont’d)
(4)(cont’d)(cont'd)

b.During the Arbitration Award Period, DSW will be obligated to sell an annual amount of 330,000 tonnes of potash to Haifa Chemicals (hereinafter – the Committed Quantities).

c.The selling prices of potash
The represented class was defined in relation to the Committed Quantities will apply as determined by the arbitrator, while distinguishing between the price for a base quantity of approximately 270,000 tonnes of potash and the price for an additional quantity of approximately 60,000 tonnes of potash. In addition, it was determined that commencing 2022, DSW will be entitled to request to establish linkage mechanism in relation to the base quantity, to be aplied as of that year.

In light of that stated, the Company updated its provisions in an insignificant amount such thatapplication as all those who acquired the Company's share at any time during the date of the report, the totalperiod commencing on June 11, 2015 and did not sell them until September 29, 2016. The aggregate amount of the provisionclaim, for all members of the represented class, is $13 million.

estimated to be between $113 million (about NIS 426 million) for maximal damage, and $7 million (about NIS 26 million), for minimal damage. The Company denies the allegations made in the application and will file its position to the Court as required by law. Considering the early stage of the proceedings, there is a difficulty in estimating the chances the application will be accepted.
(5)In 2014, ICL received a petition submitted in Israel to the District Court in respect of a purported class action against its subsidiary, DSW. According to the petition, the plaintiff is a farmer who has bought and currently buys potash in Israel for fertilization purposes, which is produced by DSW, and seeks to represent a group of class members that would include all purchasers of potash or products containing potash. The period covered by the claim is from January 1, 2007 up to the approval date of the compromise agreement referred to below.

In January 2017, the District Court of the Central District – Lod approved the compromise agreement, the highlights of which are as follows:

1.The group of plaintiffs was defined as all the direct consumers, indirect consumers, farmers and end-users who acquired potash or a product in which potash is a component. It is clarified that Haifa Chemicals Ltd. and any party that acquired from it potash or its products in the downward supply chain are not included in the arrangement.

2.Compensation for past damages – DSW will pay the group of plaintiffs the amount of about $5.5 million as compensation in respect of the period covered by the claim.

3.Future arrangement – commencing from the date on which the court decision approving the compromise agreement becomes final, and up to the passage of 7 years therefrom, the price of the potash at the factory gate of DSW, without shipping and other expenses, shall not exceed the lower of: (a) $400 per ton of potash, or (b) the average of the three cheapest prices at which DSW sold potash to its customers outside of Israel in the quarter preceding the sale in Israel, after such price is adjusted to the factory gate (“the Controlled Price”). The Controlled Price will apply to a base quantity of 20,000 tons of potash per year, while beyond this quantity DSW will have no restriction with respect to the price. It was further agreed that in connection with granulated potash, DSW will be entitled to charge up toJuly 2018, an additional $20 per ton of potash in excess of the Controlled Price. With reference to packaged potash, DSW will be entitled to charge the Controlled Price plus the average price charged to its foreign customers for packaging potash.


Note 20 - Commitments, Concessions and Contingent Liabilities (cont’d)

C.Contingent liabilities (cont’d)

(6)In 2013, a requestapplication for certification of a claim as a class action was filed with the Central District Court against the Company Israel Corporationand its subsidiaries, Rotem Amfert Negev Ltd., Potashcorp Cooperative Agricultural Society and Fertilizers and Chemicals Ltd., (jointly hereinafter – the membersDefendants). The causes of action are the alleged exploitation of the Company’s Board of DirectorsDefendants' monopolistic position to charge consumers in Israel excessive and its CEO, was filed in the District Court in Tel-Aviv, on the grounds of a misleading detail, deceptionunfair prices for products classified as "solid phosphate fertilizer" between 2011 and non-disclosure of a material detail in the Company’s reports, this allegedly being in violation of2018, contrary to the provisions of the SecuritiesRestrictive Trade Practices Law, and unjust enrichment at the general lawsexpense of the plaintiff and the represented group. The representative plaintiff is a Kibbutz member who grows various plants and trees in Israel.his yard and in a nearby orchard. The represented group includes all the consumers who purchased, directly or indirectly, solid phosphate fertilizer products manufactured by the Defendants, or farming produce fertilized with solid phosphate fertilizer or food products that include such farming produce as stated above, in the years 2011-2018 (hereinafter – the Represented Group).

In December 2016,

According to the Districtstatement of claim, the plaintiff requests, among other things, that the Court rules in Tel-Aviv rejectedhis favor and in favor of the requestRepresented Group, awarding them compensation for certificationthe damages allegedly caused to them, in the total amount of NIS 56 million (about $15 million), based on a calculation pursuant to the "difference test", measuring the difference between the price of a claimproduct and its cost, as a class action as stated. In addition, the Court ruled that the plaintiff is to pay the Company and the other defendants part of the trial expenses and attorneys’ fees.

(7)In 2015, the Israeli Public Utilities Authority – Electricity (hereinafter – "the Electricity Authority") resolved to impose certain electricity system management services charges also on private electricity producers as opposed to only on private consumers, this being retroactively from June 2013.

In August 2016, the Electricity Authority published a revision to its decision that gave rise to a reduction of the charges to the Company for the electricity system management services relating to prior periods.

In light of that stated, during 2016, the Company reduced its provision by $16 million against the “other income” categorydescribed in the statement of income.

ICL, DSW and Rotem filedclaim, or in the amount of about NIS 73 million (about $20 million), based on the "comparison test", comparing the price of a petition againstproduct to its price in other markets, as described in the decisionstatement of the Electricity Authority contendingclaim. It should be noted that the decision suffers from significant flaws. On January 23,Company's total sales of solid phosphate fertilizers in Israel during 2017 were negligible. In December 2018, the Supreme Court sitting asCompany filed its written response. In the High Court of Justice issued a conditional order against the State of Israel with reference to the “retroactive” charges. The State was required to submitCompany’s estimation, it is more likely than not that its response affidavit in connection with the retroactive charges for 2013 and 2014.

claims will be accepted.
(8)(6)In 2015, an appeal was filed in the Israeli Court for Water Matters by Man Nature and LawAdam Teva V’Din - Israeli Association for Environmental Protection (ATD) wherein the Court was requested to order the Government Water and Sewage Authority to issue a production license to DSW pursuant to the Water Law with respect to the transfer of water from the North Basin of the Dead Sea to the evaporation ponds in the Sea’s South Basin in order to regulate and supervise, within the framework of the production license, transfer of the water, as stated, in connection with certain aspects, including limitation of the quantities transferred. Recently, the Government Water and Sewage Authority issued directives to DSW (not in the framework of the production license), after hearing the latter’s position regarding transfer of the water, as stated, which included reference to quantities and reporting requirements. In January 2017, the Court rejected the appeal. On January 30, 2017, Man Nature and Law filed an appeal on the Court’s decision, as stated.

F - 101

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018
Note 20 - Commitments, Concessions and Contingent Liabilities (cont’d)

C. Contingent liabilities (cont’d)
C.(6)Contingent liabilities (cont’d)(cont'd)

In August 2016, the Government Water and Sewage Authority issued directives to DSW (not in the framework of the production license), after hearing the latter’s position, which included limitations on the quantities of water transferred, as well as mechanisms for reporting of pumping volume. As at the reporting date, summaries have been filed by all the parties and the case is waiting for the Court's judgement. In the Company’s estimation, the legal proceedings in this matter will end without material influence on its operations.
(7)
In September 2017, a decision of the District Court in Beer Sheva was received regarding a dispute between the National Company for Roads in Israel and DSW, whereby the Company is to participate in restoration of the bridges and bear responsibility for the damage caused as a result of leakage of chemical materials from DSW’s trucks. In October 2017, DSW filed an appeal in the Supreme Court of the District Court’s decision, and in November 2017, the National Company for Roads in Israel filed a counter appeal. In November 2018, the parties agreed to start a mediation process. Considering the early stage of the proceeding, there is a difficulty in estimating its chances.
(8)
Following the discontinuation of the Harmonization Project (global ERP system), the Company entered into a mediation proceeding with the lead supplier in the Project (hereinafter - IBM Israel), for settlement of mutual monetary disputes that arose upon the said discontinuation. In December 2018, following the termination of the mediation proceeding, under which the Company had paid an immaterial amount, the Company filed a lawsuit in the Tel Aviv District Court, against IBM Israel, in the amount of $300 million (about NIS 1.1 billion), for compensation of the damages incurred to the Company due to IBM’s failure to meet its undertakings within the Project, which led to the failure of the Project. Considering the early stages of the proceedings, there is a difficulty in estimating the certainty of the outcome.
(9)During the first half of 2016,In October 2018, a claimpetition was filed to the International Trade Administration of the U.S. Department of Commerce and the U.S. International Trade Commission by several plaintiffsa US Magnesium company (hereinafter - US Magnesium), to impose antidumping and countervailing duties on imports of magnesium from Israel. US Magnesium claims that imports of magnesium produced in Israel by Dead Sea Magnesium Ltd. are being subsidized and sold at less than fair value in the United States District Court for the DistrictU.S. market. The US Department of Columbia, against a large number of defendants, including the Company, alleging aggravated trespass and pillage. In August 2016, the plaintiffs removed the Company from the list of defendants.Commerce is expected to issue its preliminary determination with respect to subsidies on May 2, 2019.

Considering the early stage of the proceedings, there is a difficulty in estimating the chances the petition will be accepted or whether tariffs will be imposed in the future.
(10)
In addition to the contingent liabilities, as stated above, as at the reporting date, of the report, the contingent liabilities regarding the mattermatters of environmental protection and legal claims, which are pending against the Group, are in immaterial amounts. It is noted that part of the above claims is covered by insurance. InAccording to the Company’s estimation, the provisions recognized in its booksfinancial statements are sufficient.


F - 102

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018
Note 21 – Equity


A. Composition:

A.As at December 31, 2018Composition:As at December 31, 2017
AuthorizedIssued and paidAuthorizedIssued and paid

 As at December 31, 2016As at December 31, 2015
 AuthorizedIssued and paidAuthorizedIssued and paid
     
 Number of Ordinary shares of NIS 1 par value (in millions)1,4851,3011,4851,300
     
 Number of  Special State share of NIS 1 par value1111
     


 Number of Ordinary shares of Israeli Shekel 1 par value (in millions)1,485* 1,305 1,485* 1,303
     
 Number of Special State share of Israeli Shekel 1 par value 1 1 1 1

(*) For information regarding the amount of treasury shares, see Note 21.G.(1).
The reconciliation of the number of shares outstanding at the beginning and at the end of the year is as follows:

 Number of Outstanding Shares (in millions)

As at January 1, 201520171,2961,301
Issuance of shares42
As at December 31, 201520171,3001,303
Issuance of shares12
As at December 31, 201620181,301
1,305

In 2015, the Company acquired the balance of Allana’s shares, where part of the consideration, $16 million, was paid by means of issuance of 2.2 million ordinary shares of the Company.


As at December 31, 2016,2018, the number of shares reserved for issuance under the Company’s option plans was 18 million.

F - 103

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018

Note 21 – Equity (cont’d)

B. Rights conferred by the shares
B.1.Rights conferredThe ordinary shares confer upon their holders voting rights (including appointment of directors by a simple majority at General Meetings of the shareholders), the right to participate in shareholders’ meetings, the right to receive profits and the right to a share in excess assets upon liquidation of ICL.
2.The Special State of Israel Share, held by the sharesState of Israel in order to safeguard matters of vital interest of the State of Israel, confers upon it special rights to make decisions, among other things, on the following matters:

The ordinary shares confer upon their holders voting rights (including appointment of directors by a simple majority at General Meetings of the shareholders), the right to participate in shareholders’ meetings, the right to receive profits and the right to a share in excess assets upon liquidation of ICL.

The Special State of Israel Share, held by the State of Israel in order to safeguard matters of vital interest of the State of Israel , confers upon it special rights to make decisions among other things on the following matters:

-Sale or transfer of Company assets, which are “vital” to the State of Israel not in the ordinary course of business.

-Voluntary liquidation, change or reorganization of the organizational structure of ICL or merger (excluding mergers of entities controlled by ICL that would not impair the rights or power of the Government, as holder of the Special State Share).

-Any acquisition or holding of 14% or more of the issued share capital of ICL.

-The acquisition or holding of 25% or more of the issued share capital of ICL (including augmentation of an existing holding up to 25%), even if there was previously an understanding regarding a holding of less than 25%.

-Any percentage of holding of the Company’s shares, which confers upon its holder the right, ability or actual possibility to appoint, directly or indirectly, such number of the Company’s directors equal to half or more of the Company’s directors actually appointed.

During the second half of 2018, an inter-ministerial team was set up, headed by the Ministry of Finance, whose purpose is, among other things, to regulate the authority and supervision in respect of the Special State of Israel Share, as well as reduce the regulatory burden. As at the date of the report, the Company is unable to estimate the implications of this process over the Company.
F - 104

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018
Note 21 – Equity (cont'd)

C.Share-based payments to employees


C. Share-based payments to employees

1.Non-marketable options


Grant dateEmployees entitledNumber of instruments (thousands)Issuance's detailsInstrument termsVesting conditionsExpiration date
November 26, 2012August 6, 2014Officers and senior employees10,809 3,993An issuance of non marketablenon-marketable and non transferrablenon-transferrable options, for no consideration, under the 2014 Equity Compensation Plan, to 416450 ICL officers and senior employees in Israel and overseas.This plan includes a “cap” for theUpon exercise, each option may be converted into one ordinary share of NIS 1 par value of the shares where if as atCompany. In case of on the exercise date the closing price of an ordinary share is higher than twice the exercise price (the “Share Value Cap”), the number of the exercised shares will be reduced so that the product of the exercised shares actually issued to an offeree multiplied by the share closing price will equal to the product of the number of exercised options multiplied by the Share Value Cap.
3 equal tranches: November 26, 2013, November 26, 2014 and November 26, 2015
(1) One third on December 1, 2016
(2) One third on December 1, 2017
(3) One third on December 1, 2018
The first and second tranches is at the end of 48 monthsTwo years from the issuance date, and the expiration date of the options for the third tranches is at the end of 60 months from the issuancevesting date.
CEO (*)December 11, 20141,190

August 6, 2014,

for ICL's CEO-August 2014

Former CEO
Officers and senior employees3,993 367An issuance of non-marketable and non-transferrable options, for no consideration, under the 2014 Equity Compensation Plan, to 450 ICL officers and senior employees in Israel and overseas.3 equal tranches: December 1, 2016, December 1, 2017 and December 1, 2018Two years from the vesting date.Plan.
CEO (*)367

May 12, 2015

for ICL's CEO & Chairman of the BOD - June 29, 2015

Officers and senior employees6,729An issuance of non-marketable and non-transferrable options, for no consideration, under the 2014 Equity Compensation Plan, to 550 ICL officers and senior employees in Israel and overseas.

Upon exercise, each option may be converted into one ordinary share of NIS 1 par value of the Company.

3 equal tranches:
(1) one third at the end of 12 months after the grant date
(2) one third at the end of 24 months after the grant date
(3) one third at the end of 36 months after the grant date

The first and second tranches is at the end of 36 months after the grant date and the expiration date of the options infor the third tranche is at the end of 48 months after the grant date.
CEO (*)June 29, 2015Former CEO530An issuance of non-marketable and non-transferrable options, for no consideration, under the 2014 Equity Compensation Plan.
Former Chairman of BOD (*)404

June 30, 2016

for ICL's CEO & Chairman of the

BOD-September 5, 2016

Officers and senior employees3,035An issuance of non-marketable and non-transferrable options, for no consideration, under the 2014 Equity Compensation Plan, to 90 ICL officers and senior employees in Israel and overseas.

Upon exercise, each option may be converted into one ordinary share of NIS 1 par value of the Company.

June 30, 2023
CEO (*)September 5, 2016Former CEO625An issuance of non-marketable and non-transferrable options, for no consideration, under the 2014 Equity Compensation Plan.
Chairman of BOD185 186
February 14, 2017Former CEO114An issuance of non-marketable and non-transferrable options, for no consideration, under the 2014 Equity Compensation Plan.February 14, 2024
June 20, 2017Officers and senior employees 6,868An issuance of non-marketable and non-transferrable options, for no consideration, under the 2014 Equity Compensation Plan  (amended).to 498 ICL officers and senior employees in Israel and overseas.June 20, 2024
August 2, 2017Chairman of BOD 165An issuance of non-marketable and non-transferrable options, for no consideration, under the 2014 Equity Compensation Plan.
F - 105

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018
Note 21 – Equity (cont'd)

C. Share-based payments to employees  (cont'd)

1.Non-marketable options (cont'd)

Grant dateEmployees entitledNumber of instruments (thousands)Issuance's detailsInstrument termsVesting conditionsExpiration date
March 6, 2018Officers and senior employees 5,554An issuance of non-marketable and non-transferrable options, for no consideration, under the 2014 Equity Compensation Plan (as amended) to 508 ICL officers and senior employees in Israel and overseas, ICL CEO and Chairman of the BOD.Upon exercise, each option may be converted into one ordinary share of NIS 1 par value of the Company.February
3 equal tranches:
(1) one third at the end of 12 months after the grant date
(2) one third at the end of 24 months after the grant date
(3) one third at the end of 36 months after the grant date
March 6, 2025
May 14, 20242018CEO 385May 14, 2025

August 20, 2018(*)ICL’s CEO and Chairman of the BOD announced their resignation during 2016. For further details, see “additional information” below. 403August 20, 2025

F - 106

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018
Note 21 – Equity (cont'd)

C.Share-based payments to employees (cont'd)

1.Non-marketable options (cont'd)


C. Share-based payments to employees (cont'd)

1. Non-marketable options (cont'd)
Additional Information

The options issued to the employees in Israel are covered by the provisions of Section 102 of the Israeli Income Tax Ordinance. The issuance will be performed through a trustee under the Capital Gains Track. The exercise price is linked to the CPI that is known as of the date of payment, which is the exercise date. In a case of distribution of a dividend by the Company, the exercise price is reduced on the “ex dividend” date, by the amount of the dividend per share (gross), based on the amount thereof in NIS on the effective date.

In September 2016, the Company’s CEO announced his resignation. In light of the above, during the third quarter of 2016 the grants awarded to the CEO as part of the Company’s equity compensation plans, which are not expected to vest by the end of his tenure, were forfeited. In addition, conclusion of the employer-employee relationship with the previous Chairman of the Company’s Board of Directors will take place on September 1, 2017. Accordingly, the grants awarded to him that will not vest by the said date were forfeited.

The fair value of the options granted under the 2012 equity compensation plan and the grants in 2014, under theas part of 2014 equity compensation plan, was estimated using the binomial model for pricing options. The grants in 2015, 2016, 2017 and 2016 (under2018 under the 2014 equity compensation plan)Equity Compensation Plan were estimated using the Black & Scholes model for pricing options. The parameters used in applying the models are as follows:

  2014 Plan
 2012 PlanGranted 2014Granted 2015Granted 2016
Share price (in $) 12.1 8.2 7.03.85
CPI-linked exercise price (in $) 12.1 8.4 7.24.31
Expected volatility:    
 First tranche36.70%29.40%25.40%30.51%
 Second tranche36.70%31.20%25.40%30.51%
 Third tranche44.20%40.80%28.80%30.51%
 Expected life of options (in years):    
 First tranche 4.0 4.3 3.07.0
 Second tranche 4.0 5.3 3.07.0
 Third tranche 5.0 6.3 4.07.0
Risk-free interest rate:    
 First tranche0.22%(0.17)%(1.00)%0.01%
 Second tranche0.22%0.05%(1.00)%0.01%
 Third tranche0.54%0.24%(0.88)%0.01%
Fair value (in $ millions) 37.7 8.4 9.04.0
Weighted average grant date fair value per option (in $) 3.1 1.9 1.21.06
     

2014 Plan
Granted 2014Granted 2015Granted 2016Granted 2017Granted 2018

Share price (in $)8.27.03.94.54.4
CPI-linked exercise price (in $)8.47.24.34.34.3
Expected volatility:     
 First tranche29.40%25.40%30.51%31.88%28.86%
 Second tranche31.20%25.40%30.51%31.88%28.86%
 Third tranche40.80%28.80%30.51%31.88%28.86%
 Expected life of options (in years):     
 First tranche4.33.07.07.07.0
 Second tranche5.33.07.07.07.0
 Third tranche6.34.07.07.07.0
Risk-free interest rate:     
 First tranche(0.17)%(1.00)%0.01%0.37%0.03%
 Second tranche0.05%(1.00)%0.01%0.37%0.03%
 Third tranche0.24%(0.88)%0.01%0.37%0.03%
Fair value (in $ millions)8.49.04.011.38.8
Weighted average grant date fair value per option (in $)1.91.21.11.61.4


F - 107


Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018
Note 21 – Equity (cont'd)

C. Share-based payments to employees (cont'd)

1.Non-marketable options (cont'd)
The expected volatility was determined on the basis of the historical volatility in the Company’s share prices. For every tranche shownprices in the above table, the vesting period is different. Since the expected life for each tranche is different, the Company used different expected volatility and risk-free interest rates for each tranche.

Tel-Aviv Stock Exchange.

Note 21 – Equity (cont'd)

C.Share-based payments to employees (cont'd)

1.Non-marketable options (cont'd)

The expected life of the options was determined on the basis of Management’s estimate of the period the employees will hold the options, taking into consideration their position with the Company and the Company’s past experience regarding the turnover of employees.

The risk-freerisk‑free interest rate was determined on the basis of the yield to maturity of shekel-denominatedshekel‑denominated Israeli Government debentures, with a remaining life equal or similar to the anticipated life of the option.

The cost of the benefit embedded in the options and shares from the Equity Compensation Plans 2012 andPlan 2014 is recognized in the statement of income over the vesting period of each portion. Accordingly, in 2016, 20152018, 2017, and 2014,2016, the Company recorded expenses of about$19 million, $16 million and $15 million, about $15 million and about $12 million, respectively.

The movement in the options during 20162018 and 20152017 are as follows:

 Number of options (in millions)
2012Plan2014Plan
Balance as at January 1, 2015 12 4
   
Movement in 2015:  
Allocated during the year- 8
Forfeited during the year

(1)

-

   
Total options outstanding as at December 31, 2015

11

12

   
Movement in 2016:  
Allocated during the year- 4
Expired during the period (8)-
Forfeited during the year

-

(2)

   
Total options outstanding as at December 31, 2016

3

14

Number of options (in millions)
2014 Plan

Balance as at January 1, 2017 14
Movement in 2017:
Granted during the year 7
Forfeited during the year (1)
Total options outstanding as at December 31, 2017 20
Movement in 2018:
Granted during the year 6
Expired during the year (6)
Forfeited during the year (1)
Exercised during the year (1)
Total options outstanding as at December 31, 2018 18


F - 108

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018
Note 21 – Equity (cont'd)

C.Share-based payments to employees (cont'd)

1.Non-marketable options (cont'd)


C. Share-based payments to employees (cont'd)

1. Non-marketable options (cont'd)
The exercise priceprices for options outstanding at the beginning and end of each period are as follows:

 December 31, 2016December 31, 2015December 31, 2014
2012 Plan US$10.6110.4410.85
2014 Plan - Granted 2014 US$6.816.907.26
2014 Plan - Granted 2015 US$6.956.98N/A
2014 Plan - Granted 2016 US$4.35N/AN/A
    

December 31, 2018December 31, 2017December 31, 2016

Granted 2014 US Dollar6.777.436.81
Granted 2015 US Dollar6.927.596.95
Granted 2016 US Dollar4.214.684.35
Granted 2017 US Dollar3.894.35-
Granted 2018 US Dollar3.89--

The number of outstanding vested options vested at the end of each period and the weighted average exercise price for these options are as follows:

 December 31, 2016December 31, 2015December 31, 2014
Number of options exercisable (In Millions) 10 118
Weighted average exercise price NIS 30.49 40.7442.18
Weighted average exercise price US$ 7.93 10.4410.85
    

follows (*):

December 31, 2018December 31, 2017December 31, 2016

Number of options exercisable (In Millions) 11 12 10
Weighted average exercise price in Israeli Shekel18.5322.5630.49
Weighted average exercise price in US Dollar4.946.517.93

(*) The share price as of December 31, 2018 is NIS 21.20 and $5.66.
The range of exercise prices for the options outstanding vested at the end of each period are as follows:

 December 31, 20162018December 31, 20152017December 31, 20142016

Range of exercise price in Israeli Shekel14.26-25.9315.01-26.316.59-40.78
Range of exercise price in NISUS Dollar16.59-40.783.81-6.9226.92-40.7428.24-42.18
Range of exercise price in US$4.33-7.594.31-10.616.9-10.447.26-10.85


The average remaining contractual life for the outstanding vested options at the end of each period are as follows:

 December 31, 2016December 31, 2015December 31, 2014
Average remaining contractual life for the outstanding vested options at the end of each period 1.25 1.911.51
    
December 31, 2018December 31, 2017December 31, 2016

Average remaining contractual life 3.90 2.60 2.40

F - 109

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018
Note 21 – Equity (cont'd)

C.Share-based payments to employees (cont'd)

C. Share-based payments to employees (cont'd)
2.Restricted shares

Grant dateEmployees entitledNumber of instruments (thousands)Vesting conditionsInstrument termsAdditional InformationFair value at the grant date (Million)

August 6, 2014,

 

for ICL's CEO – August 2014

 

Officers and senior employees9223 equal tranches: December 1, 2016,  December 1, 2017 and December 1, 2018An issuance for no consideration, under the 2014 Equity Compensation Plan, to 450 ICL officers and senior employees in Israel and overseas.

The value of the restricted shares was determined according to the closing price on the TASE on the most recent trading day preceding the grant date (the date approval of the BOD and/or the date of the approval of the General Meeting).

 

The vesting date is subject to the directors continuing to serve in their positions on the vesting date, unless they ceased to hold office due to certain circumstances set forth in sections 231-232a and 233(2) of the Israeli Companies Law.

 

8.4
CEO (*)86
February 26, 2015Directors of the company (excluding ICL's CEO)99

(1) 50% will vest August 28, 2015

 

(2) 25% will vest February 26, 2017

 

(3) 25% will vest February 26, 2018

 

An issuance for no consideration, under the 2014 Equity Compensation Plan.0.7

May 12, 2015,

 

for ICL's CEO & Chairman of the BOD - June 29, 2015

 

Officers and senior employees1,1943 equal tranches: (1) one third at the end of 12 months after the grant date (2) one third at the end of 24 months after the grant date (3) one third at the end of 36 months after the grant date.

An issuance for no consideration, under the 2014 Equity Compensation Plan, to 550 ICL officers and senior employees in Israel and overseas.

 

9.7
CEO (*)90
Chairman of the BOD (*)68
December 23, 2015ICL’s Directors  (excluding ICL's CEO& Chairman of the BOD)1213 equal tranches: December 23, 2016, December 23, 2017 and December 23, 2018.An issuance for no consideration, under the 2014 Equity Compensation Plan.0.5

June 30, 2016,

 

for ICL's CEO & Chairman of the BOD-September 5, 2016

 

Officers and senior employees9903 equal tranches: (1) one third at the end of 12 months after the grant date (2) one third at the end of 24 months after the grant date (3) one third at the end of 36 months after the grant date.An issuance for no consideration, under the 2014 Equity Compensation Plan, to 90 ICL officers and senior employees in Israel and overseas.4.8
Chairman of the BOD55
CEO (*)185
January 3, 2017ICL’s Directors (excluding ICL's Chairman of the BOD)146

An issuance for no consideration, under the 2014 Equity Compensation Plan (amended).

 

The value includes a reduction of 5% from the value of the equity compensation, pursuant to the decision of the directors in March 2016, to reduce their annual cash compensation for 2016 and 2017.

 

1.0
February 14, 2017CEO38An issuance for no consideration, under the 2014 Equity Compensation Plan (amended).0.7


Grant dateEmployees entitledNumber of instruments (thousands)Vesting conditions (*)Instrument termsAdditional InformationFair value at the grant date (Million)
August 6, 2014Officers and senior employees 922
3 equal tranches:
(1) One third on December 1, 2016
(2) One third on December 1, 2017
(3) One third on December 1, 2018
 
An issuance for no consideration, under the 2014 Equity Compensation Plan, to 450 ICL officers and senior employees in Israel and overseas.The value of the restricted shares was determined according to the closing price on the TASE on the most recent trading day preceding the grant date (the date approval of the BOD and/or the date of the approval of the General Meeting where required).8.4
December 11, 2014Former CEO 86An issuance for no consideration, under the 2014 Equity Compensation Plan.
February 26, 2015ICL’s Directors (excluding ICL's CEO) 99
3 tranches:
(1) 50% will vest August 28, 2015
(2) 25% will vest February 26, 2017
(3) 25% will vest February 26, 2018
An issuance for no consideration, under the 2014 Equity Compensation Plan, to 11 ICL Directors.0.7
May 12, 2015Officers and senior employees 1,194
3 equal tranches:
(1) one third at the end of 12 months after the grant date
(2) one third at the end of 24 months after the grant date
(3) one third at the end of 36 months after the grant date
An issuance for no consideration, under the 2014 Equity Compensation Plan, to 550 ICL officers and senior employees in Israel and overseas.9.7
June 29, 2015Former CEO 90An issuance for no consideration, under the 2014 Equity Compensation Plan.
Former Chairman of the BOD 68
December 23, 2015ICL’s Directors (excluding ICL's CEO & Chairman of the BOD) 121
3 equal tranches:
(1) One third on December 23, 2016
(2) One third on December 23, 2017
(3) One third on December 23, 2018
 
An issuance for no consideration, under the 2014 Equity Compensation Plan, to 8 ICL Directors.0.5

(*) ICL’s CEOThe vesting date is subject to the employee entitled continuing to be employed by the Company and Chairmanthe directors continuing to serve in their positions on the vesting date, unless they ceased to hold office due to certain circumstances set forth in sections 231-232a and 233(2) of the BOD announcedIsraeli Companies Law.
F - 110

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018
Note 21 – Equity (cont'd)
C. Share-based payments to employees (cont'd)
2.Restricted shares (cont’d)
Grant dateEmployees entitledNumber of instruments (thousands)Vesting conditions (*)Instrument termsAdditional InformationFair value at the grant date (Million)
June 30, 2016Officers and senior employees 990
3 equal tranches:
(1) one third at the end of 12 months after the grant date
(2) one third at the end of 24 months after the grant date
(3) one third at the end of 36 months after the grant date
An issuance for no consideration, under the 2014 Equity Compensation Plan, to 90 ICL officers and senior employees in Israel and overseas.The value of the restricted shares was determined according to the closing price on the TASE on the most recent trading day preceding the grant date (the date approval of the BOD and/or the date of the approval of the General Meeting where required).4.8
September 5, 2016Chairman of the BOD 55An issuance for no consideration, under the 2014 Equity Compensation Plan.
Former CEO 185
January 3, 2017ICL’s Directors (excluding ICL's Chairman of the BOD) 146
An issuance for no consideration, under the 2014 Equity Compensation Plan, to 8 ICL Directors.
The value includes a reduction of 5% from the value of the equity compensation, pursuant to the decision of the directors in March 2016, to reduce their annual compensation for 2016 and 2017.
0.6
February 14, 2017Former CEO 38An issuance for no consideration, under the 2014 Equity Compensation Plan.0.2
June 20, 2017Officers and Senior employees 2,211An issuance for no consideration, under the 2014 Equity Compensation Plan, to 494 ICL officers and senior employees in Israel and overseas.10
August 2, 2017Chairman of BOD 53An issuance for no consideration, under the 2014 Equity Compensation Plan.0.3
January 10, 2018ICL’s Directors (excluding ICL's CEO & Chairman of the BOD) 137An issuance for no consideration, under the 2014 Equity Compensation Plan, to 7 ICL Directors.0.6

(*) The vesting date is subject to the employee entitled continuing to be employed by the Company and the directors continuing to serve in their resignation during 2016. For further details, see “additional information” above.

positions on the vesting date, unless they ceased to hold office due to certain circumstances set forth in sections 231-232a and 233(2) of the Israeli Companies Law.

F - 111

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018
Note 21 – Equity (cont'd)
C. Share-based payments to employees (cont'd)
3.Restricted shares (cont’d)

Grant dateEmployees entitledNumber of instruments (thousands)Vesting conditions (*)Instrument termsAdditional InformationFair value at the grant date (Million)
March 6, 2018Officers and senior employees 1,726
3 equal tranches:
(1) one third at the end of 12 months after the grant date
(2) one third at the end of 24 months after the grant date
(3) one third at the end of 36 months after the grant date
An issuance for no consideration, under the 2014 Equity Compensation Plan (as amended).The value of the restricted shares was determined according to the closing price on the TASE on the most recent trading day preceding the grant date (the date approval of the BOD and/or the date of the approval of the General Meeting where required).8
May 14, 2018CEO 1210.6
August 20, 2018Chairman of BOD 470.2
ICL’s Directors (excluding ICL's CEO & Chairman of the BOD) 88Acceleration at January 2019.0.4
(*) The vesting date is subject to the employee entitled continuing to be employed by the Company and the directors continuing to serve in their positions on the vesting date, unless they ceased to hold office due to certain circumstances set forth in sections 231-232a and 233(2) of the Israeli Companies Law.
F - 112

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018
Note 21 – Equity (cont’d)

D.

D. Dividends distributed to the Company's Shareholders

Board of Directors decision date

to distribute

the dividend

Actual date of

distribution of

the dividend

Gross amount of

the dividend

distributed

(in millions of $)

Net amount of

the distribution

(net of the

subsidiary’s share)

(in millions of $)

Amount of

the dividend

per share

     
February 11, 2014March 26, 2014500499.1$0.39
March 18, 2014May 27, 20148382.9$0.07
May 14, 2014June 25, 201491.591.3$0.07
August 6, 2014September 17, 20144747$0.04
November 11, 2014December 17, 2014125125$0.10
March 19, 2015April 29, 201559.559.5$0.05
May 12, 2015June 23, 2015151151$0.12
August 11, 2015September 10, 201552.552.5$0.04
November 11, 2015December 16, 20158484$0.07
March 15, 2016April 18, 20166767$0.05
May 17, 2016June 22, 20163535$0.03
August 9, 2016September 27, 20166060$0.05
November 22, 2016January 4, 20176060$0.05

Subsequent to the date of the report, on February 14, 2017, the Company’s Board of Directors decided to distribute a dividend in the amount of about $57 million, about $0.04 per share. The dividend will be distributed on April 4, 2017.

Company's Shareholders

Board of Directors decision date
to distribute
the dividend
E.
Actual date of
distribution of
the dividend
Cumulative translation adjustment
Gross amount of the dividend
distributed
(in millions of $)
Net amount of
the distribution
(net of the
subsidiary’s share)
(in millions of $)
Amount of
the dividend
per share
(in $)


March 15, 2016April 18, 201667670.05
May 17, 2016June 22, 201635350.03
August 9, 2016September 27, 201660600.05
November 22, 2016January 4, 201760600.05
February 14, 2017April 4, 201757570.04
May 9, 2017June 20, 201734320.03
August 2, 2017September 13, 201732320.02
November 7, 2017December 20, 201757560.04
February 13, 2018March 14, 201870690.05
May 10, 2018June 20, 201852510.04
July 31, 2018September 4, 201856560.04
October 31, 2018December 19, 201866650.05
February 5, 2019 (after the reporting date)*March 13, 201962610.05


(*) The record date is February 28, 2019 and the payment date is March 13, 2019.

E. Cumulative translation adjustment
The translation reserve includes all translation differences arising from translation of financial statements of foreign operations.

F.Capital reserves

F. Capital reserves
The capital reserves include expenses for share-basedshare‑based compensation to employees against a corresponding increase in equity (see section C. above).

G.Treasury shares

1) On August 4, 2014, the Company received 2.2 million ordinary shares of NIS 1 par and change in investment at fair value through other comprehensive income (investment in 15% of the Company, for no consideration, which were held by a wholly-controlled subsidiaryshare capital of YYTH, see Note 23.B).

F - 113

Notes to the Company.

Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018

Note 21 – Equity (cont’d)


G. Treasury shares
G.1)TreasuryDuring 2008 and 2009 22.4 million shares (cont'd)were acquired by the Company under a purchase plan, for a total consideration of approximately $258 million. Total shares held by the company and it's subsidiaries are 24.5 million.

2) On September 3, 2008, the Company’s Board of Directors decided to authorize the Company, to acquire from time to time, up to June 30, 2009, ordinary shares of the Company up to 5% of the Company’s issued and paid share capital – out of the Company’s distributable earnings in accordance with the Israeli Companies Law. In total, 22.4 million shares were acquired by the Company under this purchase plan, constituting approximately 1.74% of the Company’s issued and paid share capital, for a total consideration of approximately $258 million.

3)

2)In determining the amount of retained earnings available for distribution as a dividend pursuant to the Israeli Companies Law, a deduction must be made from the balance of the retained earnings the amount of self‑acquisitions (that are presented separately in the “treasury shares” category in the equity section).
H. Retained earnings
The retained earnings available for distribution as a dividend pursuantinclude actuarial gains (see Note 18.E) and dividends to the Israeli Companies Law, a deduction must be made from the balance of the retained earnings the amount of self-acquisitions (that are presented separately in the “treasury shares” category in the equity section).

shareholders.

Note 2222 - Details of Income Statement Items

 For the year ended December 31
 201620152014
 $ millions$ millions$ millions
    
Sales5,3635,4056,111
    
Cost of sales   
Materials1,5461,5761,510
Energy315305348
Cost of labor753694823
Other1,0891,0271,234
 3,703

3,602

3,915

    

 For the year ended December 31
 201820172016
 $ millions$ millions$ millions

Sales 5,556 5,418 5,363
    
Cost of sales   
Materials 1,643 1,504 1,546
Cost of labor 791 777 753
Depreciation and amortization 384 363 317
Energy 349 343 315
Other 535 759 772
  3,702 3,746 3,703


F - 114

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018
Note 22 - Details of Income Statement Items (cont’d)

 For the year ended December 31
 201620152014
 $ millions$ millions$ millions
Selling, transport and marketing expenses   
Transport475417525
Cost of labor119113160
Other128123154
    
 722653839
General and administrative expenses   
Cost of labor188150146
Professional Services7710373
Other569787
 321350306
    
Research and development expenses, net   
Cost of labor485462
Other252025
    
 737487
    

 For the year ended December 31
 201620152014
 $ millions$ millions$ millions
Other income and expenses   
Insurance compensation3020-
Retroactive electricity charges16--
Capital gain from divestitures of subsidiaries-215-
Other capital gains-742
Past service cost14-6
Other1185
    
Other income recorded in the income statements7125053
    
Write-down and impairment of assets (1)4899071
Provision for historical waste removal51207
Provision for early retirement and dismissal of employees39484
Provision in respect of prior periods resulting from an arbitration decision1310149
Retroactive electricity charges-20-
Other262328
    
Other expenses recorded in the income statements618211259
    

(1)See Note 13.
 For the year ended December 31
 201820172016
 $ millions$ millions$ millions

Selling, transport and marketing expenses   
Transport 553 497 475
Cost of labor 125 122 119
Other 120 127 128
    
  798 746 722
General and administrative expenses   
Cost of labor 172 170 188
Professional Services 44 49 77
Other 41 42 56
  257 261 321
    
Research and development expenses, net   
Cost of labor 38 40 48
Other 171525
    
  55 55 73

 For the year ended December 31
 201820172016
 $ millions$ millions$ millions

Other income   
Capital gain 841 54-
Past service cost 7- 14
Retroactive electricity charges- 6 16
Insurance compensation- 30 30
Other 11 19 11
    
Other income recorded in the income statements 859 109 71
    
Other expenses   
Provision for legal claims 31 31 21
Impairment of assets 19 32 489
Provision for historical waste removal and site closure costs 18- 51
Provision for early retirement and dismissal of employees 7 20 39
Environment related provisions 1 7-
Other 8- 18
  �� 
Other expenses recorded in the income statements 84 90 618

F - 115

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018
Note 22 - Details of Income Statement Items (cont’d)

 For the year ended December 31
 201620152014
 $ millions$ millions$ millions
Financing income and expenses   
Financing income:   
Financing income recorded in relation to employee benefits--3
Net change in fair value of derivative financial instruments24--
Net gain from changes in exchange rates and interest income152119
 2552122
    
Financing expenses:   
Interest expenses to banks and others (*)151101102
Financing expenses in relation to employee benefits1718-
Bank commissions452
Net change in fair value of derivative financial instruments-57191
Net loss from changes in exchange rates7--
    
Financing expenses179181295
Net of borrowing costs capitalized222116
 157160279
    
Net financing expenses recorded in the  income statements132108157
    

(*)The interest expenses in 2016 include $38 million related to an agreement with the Israeli Tax Authority and interest related to royalties’ arbitration.

 For the year ended December 31
 201820172016
 $ millions$ millions$ millions

Financing income and expenses   
Financing income:   
Financing income recorded in relation to employee benefits 7--
Net change in fair value of derivative financial instruments- 104 24
Net gain from changes in exchange rates and interest income 49 1 1
  56 105 25
    
Financing expenses:   
Interest expenses to banks and others 117 120 151
Financing expenses in relation to employee benefits- 38 17
Banks and finance institutions commissions (mainly commission on early repayment of loans) 18 16 4
Net change in fair value of derivative financial instruments 101--
Net loss from changes in exchange rates- 78 7
    
Financing expenses 236 252 179
Net of borrowing costs capitalized 22 23 22
  214 229 157
    
Net financing expenses recorded in the income statements 158 124 132


F - 116

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018

Note 23 - Financial Instruments and Risk Management

A.General

A. General
The Group has extensive international operations wherein it is exposed to credit, liquidity and market risks (including currency, interest and other price risks). In order to reduce the exposure to these risks, the Group holds financial derivative instruments, (including forward transactions, SWAP transactions, and options) for purposes of economic (non-accounting) hedging ofto reduce the exposure to foreign currency risks, commodity price risks, energy and marine transport and interest risks. Furthermore, the Group holds derivative financial instruments to hedge the exposure and changes in the cash flows.

The transactions in derivatives are executed with large Israeli and non-Israeli financial institutions, and therefore Group management believes the credit risk in respect thereof is low.

This Note presents information about the Group’s exposure to each of the above risks, and the Group’s objectives, policies and processes for measuring and managing risk.

The Group companies

We regularly monitor on a regular basis the extent of the exposuresour exposure and the hedges in respect thereof. The hedging policies of all the types of exposures are discussed by the Company’s Board of Directors in the frameworkrate of the annual budget. The Finance Committee ofhedging transactions for the Company’s Board of Directors receives a report every quarter in the framework of the discussion of the quarterly results, as a means of controlling implementation of the policies and for purposes of updating the policies, where necessary. The Group’s management implements the policies that are determined, while taking into considerationvarious risks described below. We execute hedging transactions according to our hedging policy with reference to the actual developments and anticipated developmentsexpectations in the various markets.

B. Groups and measurement bases of financial assets and financial liabilities
As at December 31, 2018
Financial assetsFinancial liabilities
Measured at fair value through the statement of incomeMeasured at fair value through the statement of comprehensive incomeMeasured at amortized costMeasured at fair value through the statement of incomeMeasured at amortized cost
$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions

Note 23

      
Cash and cash equivalents-- 121--
Short-term investments and deposits-- 92--
Trade receivables-- 990--
Other receivables 13- 30--
Investments at fair value through other comprehensive income- 145---
Other non-current assets 15- 66--
Total financial assets 28 145 1,299--
Short term credit---- (610)
Trade payables---- (715)
Other current liabilities--- (21) (330)
Long-term debt and debentures---- (1,815)
Other non-current liabilities---- (6)
Total financial liabilities--- (21) (3,476)
Total financial instruments, net 28 145 1,299 (21) (3,476)


F - 117

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Instruments and Risk Management (cont’d)

B.Groups and measurement bases of financial assets and financial liabilities

 As at December 31,2016

 Financial assets Financial liabilities
 Measured at fair value through the statement of  incomeMeasured at fair value through the statement of comprehensive incomeLoans and receivablesMeasured at fair value through the statement of incomeMeasured at amortized cost
 $ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions
      
Cash and cash equivalents--87--
      
Short-term investments and deposits10-19--
      
Trade receivables--966--
      
Other receivables12-47--
      
Financial assets available for sale-253---
      
Other non-current assets3-9--
      
Total financial assets252531,128--
      
Short term credit----(588)
      
Trade payables----(644)
      
Other current liabilities---(3)(334)
      
Long-term debt and debentures----(2,796)
      
Other non-current liabilities---(5)(2)
      
Total financial liabilities---(8)(4,364)
      
Total financial instruments, net252531,128(8)(4,364)
      
Statements as at December 31, 2018

Note 23 - Financial Instruments and Risk Management (cont'd)

B. Groups and measurement bases of financial assets and financial liabilities (cont'd)
C.As at December 31, 2017
Credit riskFinancial assetsFinancial liabilities
Measured at fair value through the statement of incomeMeasured at fair value through the statement of comprehensive incomeMeasured at amortized costMeasured at fair value through the statement of incomeMeasured at amortized cost
$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions

(1)General

(a)Customer credit risks


      
Cash and cash equivalents-- 83--
Short-term investments and deposits-- 90--
Trade receivables-- 932--
Other receivables 5- 81--
Investments at fair value through other comprehensive income- 212---
Other non-current assets 64- 9--
Total financial assets 69 212 1,195--
Short term credit---- (822)
Trade payables---- (790)
Other current liabilities--- (3) (311)
Long-term debt and debentures---- (2,388)
Other non-current liabilities--- (3) (1)
Total financial liabilities--- (6) (4,312)
Total financial instruments, net 69 212 1,195 (6) (4,312)


F - 118

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018
Note 23 - Financial Instruments and Risk Management (cont'd)
C. Credit risk
(1) General
(a) Customer credit risks
Credit risk is the risk of financial loss to the Group if a customer or counterparty to a financial instrument fails to meet its contractual obligations, and it arises mainly from the Group’s receivables from customers and from other receivables as well as from investments in securities.

The Company sells to a wide range and large number of customers, including customers with material credit balances. On the other hand, the Company does not have a concentration of sales to individual customers.

The Company has a regular policy of insuring the credit risk of all its customers by means of purchasing credit insurance with insurance companies, other than sales to government agencies and sales in small amounts. AllMost of all other sales are executed only after receiving approval of coverage in the necessary amount from an insurance company or other collaterals of a similar level.

The use of an insurance company as aforementioned ensures that the credit risk is managed professionally and objectively by an expert external party and transfers most of the credit risk to third parties. Nevertheless, the common deductible in credit insurances is 10% (even higher in a small number of cases) thus the Group is still exposed to part of the risk, out of the total insured amount.

In addition, the Group has an additional deductible of a cumulative annual amount of approximately $5$6 million through a wholly-ownedwholly‑owned captive reinsurance Company.

Most of the Group’s customers have been trading with the Group for many years and only rarely have credit losses been incurred by the Group. The financial statements include specific allowance for doubtful debts that appropriately reflect, in Management’s opinion, the credit loss in respect of accounts receivables iswhich are considered doubtful.

(b)Credit risks in respect of deposits

(b) Credit risks in respect of deposits
The Group deposits its balance of liquid financial assets in bank deposits and in securities. All the deposits are with a diversified group of leading banks preferably with banks that provide loans to the Group.


F - 119


Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018
Note 23 - Financial Instruments and Risk Management (cont'd)

C.Credit risk (cont’d)

(2)Maximum Exposure to credit risk

C. Credit risk (cont’d)
(2) Maximum Exposure to credit risk
The carrying amount of financial assets represents the maximum credit exposure. The maximum exposure to credit risk at the reporting date was:

 As at December 31
 Carrying amount ($ millions)
 20162015
Cash and cash equivalents 87161
Short term investments and deposits 2987
Trade receivables 9661,082
Other receivables 5990
Financial assets available for sale 253-
Other non-current assets124
 1,4061,424
   

 As at December 31
 Carrying amount ($ millions)
 20182017

Cash and cash equivalents 121 83
Short term investments and deposits 92 90
Trade receivables 990 932
Other receivables 43 86
Investments at fair value through other comprehensive income 145 212
Other non-current assets 81 73
 1,472 1,476

The maximum exposure to credit risk for trade receivables, at the reporting date by geographic region was:

 As at December 31
 Carrying amount ($ millions)
 20162015
Eastern Europe 1836
Western Europe 274292
North America 154147
South America 102101
Asia 261352
Israel 8250
Other75104
 966

1,082

   
 As at December 31
 Carrying amount ($ millions)
 20182017

Western Europe 294 332
Asia 342 293
North America 150 131
South America 106 70
Israel 72 70
Other 26 36
  990 932


F - 120

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018
Note 23 - Financial Instruments and Risk Management (cont'd)

C.Credit risk (cont'd)

(3)Aging of debts and impairment losses

C. Credit risk (cont'd)
(3) Aging of debts and impairment losses
The aging of trade receivables at the reporting date was:

 As at December 31
 20162015
 GrossImpairmentGrossImpairment
 $ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions
Not past due832-961-
Past due up to 3 months91-110-
Past due 3 to 12 months44(1)13(2)
Past due over 12 months5(5)9(9)
 972(6)1,093(11)
     

 As at December 31
 20182017
 GrossImpairmentGrossImpairment
 $ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions

Not past due 829- 785-
Past due up to 3 months 114- 125-
Past due 3 to 12 months 38 (1) 23 (6)
Past due over 12 months 12 (2) 10 (5)
  993 (3) 943 (11)

The movement in the allowance of doubtful accounts during the year was as follows:

 20162015
 $ millions$ millions
Balance as at January 1118
Additional allowance15
Write offs(3)-
Reversals(2)(1)
Changes due to translation differences(1)(1)
Balance as at December 31611
   
 20182017
 $ millions$ millions

Balance as at January 1 11 6
Additional allowance 1 5
Write offs (7) (1)
Reversals (1)-
Changes due to translation differences (1) 1
Balance as at December 31 3 11


F - 121

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018
Note 23 - Financial Instruments and Risk Management (cont'd)

D.Liquidity risk

D. Liquidity risk
Liquidity risk is the risk that the Group will not be able to meet its financial obligations as they fall due. The Group’s approach to managing liquidity is to ensure, as far as possible, that it will always have sufficient liquidity to timely meet its liabilities, under both normal and stressed conditions, without incurring unwanted losses.

The Company manages the liquidity risk by holding cash balances, short-term deposits and secured bank credit facilities.

The following are the contractual maturities of financial liabilities, including estimated interest payments:

 As at December 31, 2016
 Carrying12 months  More than
 amountor less1-2 years3-5 years5 years
 $ millions
      
Non-derivative financial liabilities     
      
Short term credit (not including current maturities) 572 576---
Trade payables 644 644---
Other current liabilities 334 334---
Long-term debt and debentures2,8121131111,6411,556
 4,3621,6671111,6411,556
      
Financial liabilities – derivative instruments utilized for economic hedging     
      
Interest rate swaps and  options 5-- 14
Foreign exchange derivatives33---
 83-14
      
As at December 31, 2018
Carrying amount12 months or less1-2 years3-5 yearsMore than 5 years
$ millions

      
Non-derivative financial liabilities     
      
Short term credit (not including current maturities) 544 556---
Trade payables 715 715---
Other current liabilities 330 330---
Long-term debt and debentures 1,881 152 453 1,084 1,166
  3,470 1,753 453 1,084 1,166
      
Financial liabilities – derivative instruments utilized for economic hedging     
      
Foreign currency and interest derivative instruments 16 16---
Derivative instruments on energy and marine transport 5 4 1--
  21 20 1--


F - 122

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018
Note 23 - Financial Instruments and Risk Management (cont'd)

D. Liquidity risk (cont'd)
D.As at December 31, 2017
Liquidity risk (cont'd)Carrying amount12 months or less1-2 years3-5 yearsMore than 5 years
$ millions

 As at December 31, 2015
 Carrying12 months  More than
 amountor less1-2 years3-5 years5 years
 $ millions
      
Non-derivative financial liabilities     
      
Short term credit (not including current maturities) 660 676---
Trade payables 716 716---
Other current liabilities 387 387---
Long-term debt and debentures2,81898971,8281,405
 4,5811,877971,8281,405
      
Financial liabilities – derivative instruments utilized for economic and accounting hedging     
      
Interest rate swaps and  options 10 1 2 16
Foreign exchange derivatives 10 6- 13
Derivative instruments on energy and marine transport1010---
 3017229
      

Note 23 - Financial Instruments and Risk Management (cont'd)

E.Market risk

Non-derivative financial liabilities     
      
Short term credit (not including current maturities) 810 822---
Trade payables 790 790---
Other current liabilities 310 310---
Long-term debt and debentures 2,400 102 345 1,085 1,358
  4,310 2,024 345 1,085 1,358
      
Financial liabilities – derivative instruments utilized for economic hedging     
      
Foreign currency and interest derivative instruments 6 3-- 3

E. Market risk
Market risk is the risk that changes in market prices, such as foreign exchange rates, interest rates and equity prices will affect the fair value or future cash flows of a financial instrument.

1.Interest risk

1. Interest risk
The Group has loans bearing variable interests and therefore its financial results and cash flows are exposed to fluctuations in the market interest rates.

ICL uses financial instruments, including derivatives, in order to hedge this exposure. The Group uses interest rate swap contracts and interest options mainly in order to reduce the exposure to cash flow risk in respect of changes in interest rates.

(a)Interest Rate Profile


F - 123

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018
Note 23 - Financial Instruments and Risk Management (cont'd)
E. Market risk (cont'd)
1. Interest risk (cont'd)
(a) Interest Rate Profile
Set forth below is detail regarding the type of interest on the Group’s non-derivative interest-bearinginterest‑bearing financial instruments:

 As at December 31
 20162015
 $ millions$ millions
Fixed rate instruments:  
Financial assets2735
Financial liabilities(1,763)(1,449)
 (1,736)(1,414)
Variable rate instruments  
Financial assets95217
Financial liabilities(1,621)(2,029)
 (1,526)(1,812)
   
 As at December 31
 20182017
 $ millions$ millions

Note 23- Financial Instruments and Risk Management (cont'd)

E.Market risk (cont’d)

1.Interest risk (cont’d)

(b)Sensitivity analysis for fixed rate instruments

Fixed rate instruments:    
Financial assets 151 88
Financial liabilities (1,728) (1,800)
  (1,577) (1,712)
Variable rate instruments  
Financial assets 128 97
Financial liabilities (714) (1,428)
  (586) (1,331)

(b) Sensitivity analysis for fixed rate instruments
Most of the Group’s instruments bearing fixed interest are not measured at fair value through the statement of income. Therefore, changes in the interest rate as at the date of the report will not be expected to have any impact on the profit or loss in respect of changes in the value of assets and liabilities bearing fixed interest.

(c)Sensitivity analysis for variable rate instruments

(c) Sensitivity analysis for variable rate instruments
The below analysis assumes that all other variables (except for the interest rate), in particular foreign currency rates, remain constant.

 As at December 31, 2016
 Impact on profit (loss) 
 Decrease ofDecrease ofIncrease ofIncrease of
 1% in interest0.5% in interest0.5% in interest1% in interest
 $ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions
Changes in Dollar interest    
Non-derivative instruments116(6)(11)
SWAP instruments(20)(13)18
 (9)(7)(5)(3)
Changes in Shekel interest    
SWAP instruments3821(13)(29)
Changes in Euro interest    
Non-derivative instruments21(1)(2)
Changes in other currencies interest    
Non-derivative instruments21(1)(2)
     
As at December 31, 2018
Impact on profit (loss)
Decrease of 1% in interestDecrease of 0.5% in interestIncrease of 0.5% in interestIncrease of 1% in interest
$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions

Changes in U.S Dollar interest    
Non-derivative instruments (1) (1) 1 1
SWAP instruments (18) (9) 9 18
  (19) (10) 10 19
Changes in Israeli Shekel interest    
SWAP instruments 19 10 (10) (19)


F - 124

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018
Note 23 -23- Financial Instruments and Risk Management (cont'd)


E. Market risk (cont’d)
1. Interest risk (cont’d)
(d) Terms of derivative financial instruments used to hedge interest risk
E.As at December 31, 2018
Market risk (cont’d)

Carrying amount (fair value)1.Stated amountMaturity dateInterest risk (cont’d)rate range
$ millions$ millionsYears%


U.S Dollar    
SWAP contracts from variable interest to fixed interest- 2502019-20241.7%-2.6%
     
Israeli Shekel    
Swap contracts from fixed ILS interest to fixed USD interest 15 486 30/3/20242.45%-4.74%
     
Euro    
Swap contracts from variable USD interest to fixed EUR interest (1) 334 15/2/20191-month Libor

(d)As at December 31, 2017
Terms of derivative financial instruments used to hedge interest riskCarrying amount (fair value)Stated amountMaturity dateInterest rate range
$ millions$ millionsYears%

 As at December 31, 2016
 Carrying   
 amountStatedMaturityInterest rate
 (fair value)amountdaterange
 $ millions$ millionsYears%
     
Dollar    
SWAP contracts from variable interest to fixed interest(6) 3800-41.4%-3.2%
     

 As at December 31, 2015
 Carrying   
 amountStatedMaturityInterest rate
 (fair value)amountdaterange
 $ millions$ millionsYears%
     
Dollar    
SWAP contracts from fixed interest to variable interest(10) 4000-91.4%-3.4%
Cylinder instruments- 1000-11.0%-3.0%
     

2.Currency risk


U.S Dollar    
SWAP contracts from variable interest to fixed interest (3) 3502018-20241.36% - 2.6%
     
Israeli Shekel    
SWAP contracts from fixed ILS interest to fixed USD interest 64 489 1/3/20242.45% - 4.74%
     
Euro    
SWAP contracts from variable USD interest to fixed EUR interest (1) 51 15/8/20181-month Libor


F - 125

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018
Note 23- Financial Instruments and Risk Management (cont'd)
E. Market risk (cont’d)
2. Currency risk 
The Group is exposed to currency risk with respect to sales, purchases, assets and liabilities that are denominated in a currency other than the functional currency of the Group. The main exposure is the NIS, Euro, British Sterling, Chinese Yuan Japanese Yen and Brazilian Real.

Turkey Lira.

The Group enters into foreign currency derivatives – forward exchange transactions and currency options – all in order to protect the Group from the risk that the eventual cash flows, resulting from existing assets and liabilities, and sales and purchases of goods within the framework of firm or anticipated commitments (based on a budget of up to one year), denominated in foreign currency, will be affected by changes in the exchange rates.


Note 23 - Financial Instruments and Risk Management (cont'd)

E.Market risk (cont'd)

2.Currency risk (cont'd)

(a)Sensitivity analysis

(a) Sensitivity analysis
A 10% increase at the rate of the US$ against the following currencies would have increased (decreased) profit or loss by the amounts shown below. This analysis assumes that all other variables, in particular interest rates, remain constant.

 As at December 31
 Impact on profit (loss)
 20162015
 $ millions$ millions
Non-derivative financial instruments  
Dollar/Euro(75)(134)
Dollar/NIS9242
Dollar/British Pound-1
Dollar/Japanese Yen-(1)
Dollar/Brazilian real(1)-
Dollar/Turkey Lira(1)-
   

 As at December 31
 Impact on profit (loss)
 20182017
 $ millions$ millions

Non-derivative financial instruments  
U.S Dollar/Euro (64) (9)
U.S Dollar/Israeli Shekel 92 92
U.S Dollar/British Pound (3) 3
U.S Dollar/Chinese Yuan (12) (4)
U.S Dollar/Turkey Lira (1) (1)

A 10% decrease of the US$ against the above currencies at December 31 would have the same effect but in the opposite direction.

F - 126

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018

Note 23 - Financial Instruments and Risk Management (cont'd)

E.Market risk (cont'd)

2.Currency risk (cont'd)

(a)Sensitivity analysis (cont'd)

E. Market risk (cont'd)
2. Currency risk (cont'd)
(a) Sensitivity analysis (cont'd)
Presented hereunder is a sensitivity analysis of the Group’s foreign currency derivative instruments as at December 31, 2016.2018. Any change in the exchange rates of the principal currencies shown below as at December 31 would have increased (decreased) profit and loss and equity by the amounts shown below. This analysis assumes that all other variables remain constant.

 As at December 31, 2016
 Increase 10%Increase 5%Decrease 5%Decrease 10%
 $ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions
     
Euro/Dollar    
Forward transactions157(6)(12)
Options42(2)(3)
     
Dollar/NIS    
Forward transactions(44)(23)2554
Options(63)(28)2154
SWAP(57)(30)3370
     
GBP/Dollar    
Forward transactions1--(1)
Options(2)(1)--
     
GBP/Euro    
Options(2)(1)-1
     
As at December 31, 2018
Increase 10%Increase 5%Decrease 5%Decrease 10%
$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions

Euro/ U.S Dollar    
Forward transactions 9 4 (4) (8)
Options 5 2 (2) (4)
SWAP 34 17 (17) (34)
     
U.S Dollar/Israeli Shekel    
Forward transactions (32) (17) 19 39
Options (75) (41) 19 43
SWAP (48) (25) 28 58
     
British Pound/U.S Dollar    
Forward transactions (4) (2) 2 3
Options (1) (1)- 1
     
U.S Dollar/Chinese Yuan  Renminbi    
Forward transactions (3) (1) 2 3
     
British Pound/Euro    
Forward transactions (4) (2) 2 4


F - 127

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018
Note 23 - Financial Instruments and Risk Management (cont'd)

E. Market risk (cont'd)
2.  Currency risk (cont'd)
(b) Terms of derivative financial instruments used to reduce foreign currency risk
E.As at December 31, 2018
Market risk (cont'd)Carrying amountStated amountAverage
$ millions$ millionsexchange rate

2.Currency risk (cont'd)

(b)Terms of derivative financial instruments used to economically hedge foreign currency risk

 As at December 31, 2016
 Carrying amountStated amountAverage
 $ millions$ millionsexchange rate
    
Forward contracts   
NIS/Dollar- 4833.8
Dollar/Euro4 2651.1
Dollar/JPY- 4115.9
Dollar/GBP1 841.3
Dollar/RMB1 306.8
Other- 10-
    
Currency and interest SWAPs   
Shekel to Dollars3 5713.7
    
Put options   
NIS/Dollar4 5993.7
Dollar/Euro2 411.1
Dollar/JPY- 3107.7
Euro/GBP- 150.8
Dollar/GBP(1) 111.3
    
Call options   
NIS/Dollar(6) 5993.7
Dollar/Euro- 411.1
Dollar/JPY- 3107.7
Euro/GBP- 150.8
Dollar/GBP- 111.3
    

Forward contracts   
U.S Dollar/Israeli Shekel 2 352 3.7
Euro/U.S Dollar 2 86 1.2
Euro/British Pound 1 19 0.9
U.S Dollar/British Pound- 32 1.3
U.S Dollar/Chinese Yuan Renminbi- 29 6.5
Other- 37-
    
Currency and interest SWAPs   
U.S Dollar/Israeli Shekel 15 486 3.7
Euro/U.S Dollar (1) 334 1.1
    
Put options   
U.S Dollar/Israeli Shekel 1 695 3.6
Euro/U.S Dollar 2 45 1.2
U.S Dollar/Japanese Yen- 3 114.3
U.S Dollar/British Pound- 11 1.3
    
Call options   
U.S Dollar/Israeli Shekel (15) 695 3.6
Euro/U.S Dollar- 45 1.2
U.S Dollar/Japanese Yen- 3 114.3
U.S Dollar/British Pound- 11 1.3


F - 128

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018
Note 23 - Financial Instruments and Risk Management (cont'd)

E. Market risk (cont'd)
2. Currency risk (cont'd)
(b) Terms of derivative financial instruments used to reduce foreign currency risk (cont’d)
E.As at December 31, 2017
Market risk (cont'd)Carrying amountStated amountAverage exchange rete
$ millions$ millions

2.Currency risk (cont'd)

(b)Terms of derivative financial instruments used to economically hedge foreign currency risk (cont’d)

 As at December 31, 2016
 Carrying amountStated amountAverage
 $ millions$ millionsexchange rate
    
Forward contracts   
NIS/Dollar- 2293.9
Dollar/Euro(1) 2911.1
Dollar/JPY- 4120.1
Euro/GBP3 5650.7
Dollar/GBP2 2151.5
Dollar/RMB- 2096.6
Other- 15-
    
Currency and interest SWAPs   
Shekel to Dollars(4) 1703.7
    
Put options   
NIS/Dollar8 6213.8
Dollar/Euro1 391.1
Dollar/JPY- 3123.9
Euro/GBP- 70.7
Dollar/GBP- 11.6
Dollar/RMB- 1006.2
    
Call options   
NIS/Dollar(10) 6213.8
Dollar/Euro- 391.1
Dollar/JPY- 3123.9
Euro/GBP- 70.7
Dollar/GBP- 11.6
    


Forward contracts   
U.S Dollar/Israeli Shekel 2 430 3.5
Euro/U.S Dollar (3) 320 1.2
Euro/British Pound- 20 0.9
U.S Dollar/British Pound- 24 1.3
U.S Dollar/Chinese Yuan  Renminbi (1) 33 6.7
Other- 33-
    
Currency and interest SWAPs   
U.S Dollar/Israeli Shekel 64 489 3.7
    
Put options   
U.S Dollar/Israeli Shekel 5 525 3.4
Euro/U.S Dollar- 63 1.2
U.S Dollar/Japanese Yen- 3 115.5
    
Call options   
U.S Dollar/Israeli Shekel (1) 525 3.4
Euro/U.S Dollar (2) 63 1.2
U.S Dollar/Japanese Yen- 3 115.5

The maturity date of all of the derivatives used to economically hedge foreign currency risk is up to a year.


F - 129

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018
Note 23 - Financial Instruments and Risk Management (cont'd)

E. Market risk (cont'd)
2. Currency risk (cont'd)
(c) Linkage terms of monetary balances – in millions of Dollars
E.As at December 31, 2018
Market risk (cont'd)US DollarEuroBritish PoundIsraeli ShekelBrazilian RealChinese Yuan RenminbiOthers

2.Currency risk (cont'd)

(c)Linkage terms of monetary balances – in millions of Dollars

 As at December 31, 2016
 US$EuroGBPNISJPYRMBOthers
Non-derivative instruments:       
Cash and cash equivalents 12 22 2 2 2 389
Short term investments and deposits 18---- 56
Trade receivables 533 199 36 50 7 8457
Other receivables 41-- 5---
Financial assets available for sale----- 253-
Other non-current assets

8

1

-

-

-

-

-

Total financial assets

612

222

38

57

9

380

72

        
Short-term credit 254 101 21 38- 1659
Trade payables 138 161 23 201- 10714
Other current liabilities 35 59 10 204- 179
Long term debt, debentures and others

1,983

150

-

542

-

87

36

Total financial liabilities

2,410

471

54

985

-

376

68

        
Total non-derivative financial instruments, net

(1,798)

(249)

(16)

(928)

9

4

4

        
Derivative instruments:       
Forward transactions- 265 84 483 4 3010
Cylinder- 41 26 599 3--
SWAPS – dollar into shekel

-

-

-

571

-

-

Total derivative instruments

-

306

110

1,653

7

30

10

        
Net exposure

(1,798)

57

94

725

16

34

14

        

Non-derivative instruments:       
Cash and cash equivalents 41 21 4 2 5 37 11
Short term investments and deposits 74 3--- 12 3
Trade receivables 516 222 60 60 25 72 35
Other receivables 6 12- 12---
Investments at fair value through other comprehensive income----- 145-
Other non-current assets 60 1- 1 4--
Total financial assets 697 259 64 75 34 266 49
        
Short-term credit 201 166 19 34 6 184-
Trade payables 150 188 23 265 11 72 6
Other current liabilities 55 46 7 192 2 19 9
Long term debt, debentures and others 1,322 5- 480 13 1-
Total financial liabilities 1,728 405 49 971 32 276 15
        
Total non-derivative financial instruments, net (1,031) (146) 15 (896) 2 (10) 34
        
Derivative instruments:       
Forward transactions- 86 51 352- 29 37
Cylinder- 45 11 695-- 3
SWAPS – U.S Dollar into Israeli Shekel--- 486---
SWAPS – U.S Dollar into Euro- 334-----
Total derivative instruments- 465 62 1,533- 29 40
        
Net exposure (1,031) 319 77 637 2 19 74


F - 130

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018
Note 23 - Financial Instruments and Risk Management (cont'd)

E. Market risk (cont'd)
2. Currency risk (cont'd)
(c) Linkage terms of monetary balances – in millions of Dollars (cont'd)
E.As at December 31, 2017
Market risk (cont'd)US DollarEuroBritish PoundIsraeli ShekelBrazilian RealChinese Yuan RenminbiOthers

2.Currency risk (cont'd)

(c)Linkage terms of monetary balances – in millions of Dollars (cont'd)

 As at December 31, 2015
 US$EuroGBPNISJPYRMBOthers
Non-derivative instruments:       
Cash and cash equivalents 33 21 5 2 4 8313
Short term investments and deposits 75 4 1 1- 42
Trade receivables 610 219 37 52 10 10252
Other receivables 73 1- 7---
Other non-current assets3-----1
Total financial assets79424543621418968
        
Short-term credit 271 91 16 6- 2827
Trade payables 185 154 34 201 1 12219
Other current liabilities 53 114 38 154- 226
Long term debt, debentures and others2,56766-141--31
Total financial liabilities3,07642588502142663
        
Total non-derivative financial instruments, net(2,282)(180)(45)(440)13(237)5
        
Derivative instruments:       
Forward transactions- 291 (215) 229 (4) 209580
Cylinder- (39) 1 621 (3) 1007
SWAPS – dollar into shekel---170---
Total derivative instruments-252(214)1,020(7)309587
        
Net exposure

(2,282)

72

(259)

580

6

72

592

        

Non-derivative instruments:       
Cash and cash equivalents 19 18 7 1 7 22 9
Short term investments and deposits 82 1--- 5 2
Trade receivables 419 246 48 59 31 92 37
Other receivables 40 1- 39-- 1
Investments at fair value through other comprehensive income----- 212-
Other non-current assets 5 1-- 3--
Total financial assets 565 267 55 99 41 331 49
        
Short-term credit 427 158 20 36 8 173-
Trade payables 187 182 23 289 15 85 9
Other current liabilities 95 77 15 96 2 21 5
Long term debt, debentures and others 1,721 29- 522 22 98-
Total financial liabilities 2,430 446 58 943 47 377 14
        
Total non-derivative financial instruments, net (1,865) (179) (3) (844) (6) (46) 35
        
Derivative instruments:       
Forward transactions- 320 44 430- 33 33
Cylinder- 63- 525-- 3
Total derivative instruments- 383 44 955- 33 36
        
Net exposure (1,865) 204 41 111 (6) (13) 71

F - 131

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018
Note 23 - Financial Instruments and Risk Management (cont'd)

E.Market risk (cont’d)

3.Other price risk

A.
E. Market risk (cont’d)
3. Other price risk
A. Investment in securities

The Group companies have an investment in marketable securities, in the amount of approximately $10 million. The impact of the change in the fair value of this investment will be recorded in the statement of income in “financing expenses” category.

B.Investment in shares

shares

The Company has an investment inof 15% of the issued and outstanding share capital on a fully diluted basis of YTH,YYTH, in the amount of approximately $253 million.$145 million (as at December 31, 2018). The investment will beis measured at fair value, and fair value updates, other than impairment losses, will beare recognized directly in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income.

C.Hedging of marine shipping and energy transactions

B. Hedging of marine shipping and energy transactions
The Company is exposed to risk in respect of marine shipping and energy costs. The Company uses marine shipping and energy derivatives to hedge the risk that its cash flows will be affected by changes in marine shipping and energy prices. As at December 31, 2016,2018, the fair value of the marine shipping and energy derivatives was approximately $0.4$(5) million.

F.Fair value of financial instruments

F. Fair value of financial instruments
The carrying amounts in the books of certain financial assets and financial liabilities, including cash and cash equivalents, investments, short-term deposits and loans, receivables and other debit balances, long-term investments and receivables, short-term credit, payables and other credit balances, long-term loans bearing variable interest and other liabilities, and derivative financial instruments, correspond to or approximate their fair value.

The following table details the book value and the fair value of financial instrument groups presented in the financial statements not in accordance with their fair value:

 As at December 31, 2016As at December 31, 2015
 Carrying amountFair valueCarrying amountFair value
 $ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions
Loans bearing fixed interest (1)293306391411
     
Debentures bearing fixed interest    
Marketable (2)1,2011,201793803
Non-marketable (3)281283281285
 1,7751,7901,4651,499
     

As at December 31, 2018As at December 31, 2017
Carrying amountFair valueCarrying amountFair value
$ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions

Loans bearing fixed interest (1) 238 244 271 279
     
Debentures bearing fixed interest    
Marketable (2) 1,201 1,217 1,247 1,291
Non-marketable (3) 281 279 281 288
  1,720 1,740 1,799 1,858

(1) The fair value of the shekel, euro, dollar and yuan loans issued bearing fixed interest is based on calculation of the present value of the cash flows in respect of the principal and the interest and is discounted at the market interest rates on the measurement date for similar loans having similar characteristics and is classified as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy. The average discount interest as at December 31, 20162018 for the shekel, euro dollar and yuan loans was 3.3%2.8%, 2.3%1.7%, 4.2% and 5.6%5.0%, respectively (December 31, 20152017 for the shekel, euro dollar and yuan loans – 2.8%- 2.4%, 1.35%1.7%, and 3.1% and 5.2%6.1%, respectively).


F - 132

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018
Note 23 - Financial Instruments and Risk Management (cont'd)

��

F.Fair value of financial instruments (cont'd)

F. Fair value of financial instruments (cont'd)
(2) The fair value of the marketable debentures is based on the quoted stock exchange price and is classified as Level 1 in the fair value hierarchy.

(3) The fair value of the non-marketablenon‑marketable debentures is based on calculation of the present value of the cash flows in respect of the principal and the interest and is discounted at the Libor rate customary in the market for similar loans having similar characteristics and is classified as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy. The average discount interest as at December 31, 20162018 was 4.98%5.3% (December 31, 201520174.85%4.57%).

G.Hierarchy of fair value

G. Hierarchy of fair value
The following table presents an analysis of the financial instruments measured by fair value, using the valuation method.  (See Note 4 for more details regarding the valuation method)4).

The following levels were defined:

Level 1: Quoted (unadjusted) prices in an active market for identical instruments

Level 2: Observed data (directly or indirectly) not included in Level 1 above.

Level 3: Inputs that

As at December 31, 2018
Level 2
$ millions

Investments at fair value through other comprehensive income (1) 145
Derivatives used for economic hedging, net 7
 152

As at December 31, 2017
Level 2
$ millions

Investments at fair value through other comprehensive income (1) 212
Derivatives used for economic hedging, net 63
 275

(1) Investment in the share capital of YYTH was subject to a three-year lock‑up period as required by Chinese law, which was expired in January 2019. Measurement of the fair value of the discount rate in respect of the lock‑up period was calculated by use of the Finnerty 2012.
The impact deriving from a possible and reasonable change in these data items, which are not based on observable market data.

 As at December 31, 2016
 Level 1Level 2Level 3Total
 $ millions$ millions$ millions$ millions
     
Securities held for trading purposes10--10
Financial assets available for sale (1)--253253
Derivatives used for economic hedging, net-7-7
 107253270
     

(1)For further details see Note 9 to our audited financial statements.
observed, is not material.

F - 133

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018

Note 24 - Earnings per Share

Basic earnings per share

Calculation of the basic earnings per share for the year ended December 31, 2016,2018, is based on the earnings allocated to the holders of the ordinary shares divided by the weighted-average number of ordinary shares outstanding, calculated as follows:

 For the year ended December 31
 201620152014
 $ millions$ millions$ millions
    
Earnings (losses) attributed to the shareholders of the Company(122)509464
    

 For the year ended December 31
 201820172016
 $ millions$ millions$ millions

Earnings (losses) attributed to the shareholders of the Company 1,240 364 (122)

Weighted-average number of ordinary shares in thousands:

 For the year ended December 31
 201620152014
 Shares thousandsShares thousandsShares thousands
    
Balance as at January 1 1,272,516 1,270,4081,270,426
Shares issued during the year- 1,174-
Shares vested77942-
Weighted average number of ordinary shares used in computation of the basic earnings per share1,273,2951,271,6241,270,426
    
 For the year ended December 31
 201820172016
 Shares thousandsShares thousandsShares thousands

Balance as at January 1 1,276,238 1,274,298 1,272,516
Shares issued during the year 73 1,054-
Shares vested 898 720 779
Weighted average number of ordinary shares used in computation of the basic earnings per share 1,277,209 1,276,072 1,273,295


F - 134

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018
Note 24 - Earnings per Share (cont’d)
Diluted earnings per share

Calculation of the diluted earnings per share for the year ended December 31, 2016,2018, is based on the earnings allocated to the holders of the ordinary shares divided by the weighted-average number of ordinary shares outstanding after adjustment for the number of potential diluted ordinary shares, calculated as follows:

Weighted average number of ordinary shares (diluted) in thousands:

 For the year ended December 31
 201620152014
 Shares thousandsShares thousandsShares thousands
    
Weighted average number of ordinary shares used in the computation of the basic earnings per share 1,273,295 1,271,6241,270,426
Effect of stock options and restricted shares-63232
Weighted average number of ordinary shares used in the computation of the diluted earnings per share1,273,2951,272,2561,270,458
    

 For the year ended December 31
 201820172016
 Shares thousandsShares thousandsShares thousands

Weighted average number of ordinary shares used in the computation of the basic earnings per share 1,277,209 1,276,072 1,273,295
Effect of stock options and restricted shares 2,572 925-
Weighted average number of ordinary shares used in the computation of the diluted earnings per share 1,279,781 1,276,997 1,273,295

At December 31, 2016, 142018, 5 million options (at December 31, 20152017 and 201420162420 million options and 1614 million options, respectively), were excluded from the diluted weighted average number of ordinary shares calculation as their effect would have been anti-dilutive.

anti‑dilutive.

The average market value of the Company’s shares, for purposes of calculating the dilutive effect of the stock options, is based on the quoted market prices for the period in which the options were outstanding.


Note 25 - Related and Interested Parties

Related parties within its meaning in IAS 24 (2009), “Related Parties Disclosure���Disclosure”; Interested parties within their meaning in Paragraph 1 of the definition of an “interested party” in Section 1 of the Israeli Securities Law, 1968.

A.Parent company and subsidiaries

Israel Corporation Ltd. (hereinafter –

Israel Corp.) is a public company listed for trading on the Tel-AvivTel Aviv Stock Exchange (TASE). Based on the information provided by Israel Corp., Millenium Investments Elad Ltd. (“Millenium”) and Mr. Idan Ofer are considered as joint controlling shareholders of Israel Corp., for purposes of the Israeli Securities Law (each of Millenium and Mr. Idan Ofer hold shares in Israel Corp. directly, and Mr. Idan Ofer serves as a director of Millenium and has an indirect interest in it as the beneficiary of the foreign discretionary trust that has indirect control of Millenium)Millenium, as stated below). Millenium holds approximately 46%46.94% of the share capital in Israel Corp., which holds as at February 14, 2017,December 31, 2018 approximately 46.18%45.86% of the voting rights and issued share capital of the Company.
F - 135

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018
Note 25 - Related and Interested Parties (cont’d)

A. Parent company and subsidiaries (cont’d)
Millenium is held by Mashat Investments Ltd. (“Mashat”) and by XT Investments Ltd. (“XT Investments”), with 80% and 20% holding rates in the issued share capital, respectively (itrespectively. (It is noted that Mashat granted XT Investments a power of attorney for a fixed period (which is extendable) to vote according to XT's discretion at General Meetings of Millenium in respect of shares constituting 5% of the voting rights in Millenium). Mashat is a private company, wholly owned by a Dutch company, Ansonia Holdings Singapore B.V. (“Ansonia”). which is incorporated in the Netherlands. Ansonia is a wholly-ownedwholly owned subsidiary of Jelany Corporation N.V. (registered in Curaçao), which is a wholly-ownedwholly owned subsidiary of thea Liberian company, Court Investments Ltd. (“Court”). Court is wholly owned by a foreign discretionary trust, in which Mr. Idan Ofer is the beneficiary. XT Investments which directly holds approximately 1.24% of the share capital of Israel Corp., is a shareholder in Millenium, as stated. XT Investments is a private company,fully held in full by XT Holdings Ltd. (“XT Holdings”), a private company whose ordinary shares are held in equal shares by Orona Investments Ltd. (which is indirectly controlled by Mr. Ehud Angel) and by Lynav Holdings Ltd., a company that is controlled by a foreign discretionary trust in which Mr. Idan Ofer is a primethe beneficiary. Mr. Ehud Angel holds, among other things, a special share that grants him, inter alia, under certain limitations and for certain issues, an additional vote on the Board of Directors of XT Holdings. In addition, Kirby Enterprises Inc., which is indirectly held by the same trust that holds Mashat, in which, as stated, Mr. Idan Ofer is the beneficiary, holds approximately 0.74% of the share capital of Israel Corp. Furthermore, Mr. Idan Ofer holds directly approximately 3.85% of the share capital of Israel Corp. Furthermore, XT Investments directly holds approximately 0.03%
As of the Company's capital (namely, 377,662 ordinary shares).

As disclosed by Israel Corp., on February 14, 2017, (hereinafter – “the reporting date”)December 31, 2018, the number of ICL's shares held by Israel Corp. includes 2,286,720does not include 9,909,848 ordinary shares, which Israel Corp. has a right to regain within 60 days from the reporting date,are subject to certain forward sale agreements, as set forth inon ICL's registration statement on Form F-1 (hereinafter - the forward agreements)Forward Agreements), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 23, 2014 (the "ICL Form F-1""Financial Transaction"). Israel Corp. does not have voting rights or dispositive power with respect to these ordinarythe shares subject to the forward agreements,Financial Transaction, which shares have been made available to the forward counterparties underfinancial entities (hereinafter - the forward agreements.Forward Counterparties) with whom it engaged in the Transaction. As of December 31, 2018, the settlement period of the Financial Transaction has commenced, which is expected to be executed, subject to its terms, in components at several settlement dates that will occur over a period of approximately nine months. In accordance with the forward agreements,terms of the Financial Transaction, Israel Corp. will not regain voting rights and dispositive power with respect to allthe said shares (“physical settlement”), in whole or a portion of such ordinary shares,in part, unless it informs the forward counterpartiesForward Counterparties otherwise at the relevant settlement dates specified in the forward agreements. In addition, the payment related to the 2,286,720 ordinary shares will be in installments on a number of settlement dates.


Note 25 - Related and Interested Parties (cont’d)

A.Parent company and subsidiaries (cont’d)

As at the reporting date, the number of ICL's shares held by Israel Corp. excludes 31,633,688 ordinary shares, which Israel Corp. has a right to regain after 60 days following the reporting date, subject to the forward agreements. Israel Corp. does not have voting rights or dispositive power with respect to these 31,633,688 ordinary shares, subject to the forward agreements, which shares have been made available to the forward counterparties. Under the forward agreements, Israel Corp. will not regain voting and dispositive power with respect to all or a portion of such 31,633,688 ordinary shares, unless it informs the forward counterparties otherwise at the relevant settlement dates specified in the forward agreements. In addition, the payment related to the 31,633,688 ordinary shares is expected to be in installments, on a number of settlement dates over a period of approximately three years.Forward Agreements. Even though Israel Corp. holds less than 50% of the Company’s ordinary shares, it still has decisive influence at the General Meetings of the Company’s shareholders and, effectively, it has the power to appoint directors and to exert significant influence with respect to the composition of the Company’s Board of Directors.

As of December 31, 2018, 141 million ordinary shares have been pledged by Israel Corporation to secure certain liabilities, almost entirely comprised of margin loans with an aggregate outstanding principal amount of $260 million.
F - 136

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018

Note 25 - Related and Interested Parties (cont'd)

B.Benefits to key management personnel (including directors)

(cont’d)


B. Benefits to key management personnel (including directors)
The senior managers, in addition to their salaries, are entitled to non-cash benefits (such as vehicle and telephone, mobile etc.). The Group contributes to a post-employment defined benefit plan on their behalf. In accordance with the terms of the plan, the retirement age of senior managers is 67. Senior managers and directors also participate in the Company's incentive and equity remuneration plans (options for Company shares and restricted shares (see Note 21 – Share-Based Payments)21).

Benefits

Set forth below are details of the benefits for key management personnel (in total 21in 2018 and 252017.
The Company's key management personnel in 2018, consists of 27 individuals, of whom 14 are not employed by the company (directors). The number of key management personnel in 2018, includes 7 individuals whose tenure was terminated during 2018. The Company's key management personnel in 2017, consisted of 21 individuals, of whom 10 were not employed by the Company (directors).
 For the year ended December 31
 20182017
 $ millions$ millions

Short-term benefits 11 8
Post-employment benefits 1 1
Share-based payments 4 4
   
Total * 16 13
   
* To interested parties employed by the Company 5 4
* To interested parties not employed by the Company 1 1

The General Meeting of the Company’s shareholders held on April 24, 2018 approved the service and employment conditions of the Company’s incoming CEO, Mr. Raviv Zoller, including equity compensation; a special bonus to the Executive Chairman of the Company’s Board of Directors, Mr. Johanan Locker, in respect of 2017; and renewal of the management services agreement with the Company’s controlling shareholder, Israel Corporation Ltd.
On May 14, 2018, Mr. Raviv Zoller entered into office as CEO of the Company, replacing the Company's Acting CEO, Mr. Asher Grinbaum. Pursuant to the approval of the General Meeting of the Company’s shareholders, as aforementioned upon entering into office as CEO, Mr. Zoller was granted with an annual equity compensation for 2018 at a total value of ILS 4 million, consisting of 120,919 restricted shares and 384,615 options exercisable into Company shares.
F - 137

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018

Note 25 - Related and Interested Parties (cont’d)

B. Benefits to key management personnel (including directors) (cont'd)
The Annual General Meeting of the Company's shareholders was held on August 20, 2018, approved an equity compensation for the year 2019 to each of the Company’s directors, as may serve from time to time, excluding the Chairman of the Company’s Board of Directors, Mr. Johanan Locker, and the directors who are officeholders in 2016our controlling shareholder, Israel Corporation Ltd., Messrs. Aviad Kaufman, Avisar Paz and 2015 respectively) comprised:

For the year ended December 31
 20162015
$ millions$ millions
Short-term benefits88
Post-employment benefits11
Share-based payments

2

6

Total *

11

15

* To interested parties employed by the Company

3

4

* To interested parties not employed by the Company

2

1

   

C.Ordinary transactions that are not exceptional

Sagi Kabla, to be issued on January 1, 2019, in the form of restricted Ordinary Shares, with a value per grant of NIS 310,000 (approximately $85,635), an equity compensation for 2018 to our Chairman of the Company’s Board, Mr. Johanan Locker  and annual bonus for 2017 in an amount of NIS 1,198,000 (approximately $330,939) and a special bonus in an amount of NIS 1,800,000 (approximately $497,238), to our retired Acting CEO of the Company, Mr. Asher Grinbaum, pursuant to the AGM's resolution out of the special bonus.

C. Ordinary transactions that are not exceptional
The Company’s Board of Directors, with the agreement of the Audit Committee, decided that a transaction with related and interested parties will be considered a “negligible transaction” for public reporting purposes if all the following conditions have been met:

(1) It is not an “extraordinary transaction” within the meaning thereof in the Companies Law.

(2) The effect of each of the parameters listed hereunder is less than one percent (hereinafter – “thethe Negligibility Threshold”Threshold),

.

For every transaction or arrangement that is tested for the Negligibility Threshold, the parameters will be examined, to the extent they are relevant, on the basis of the Company's condensed or audited consolidated financial statements, as applicable, prior to the transaction, as detailed below:

Assets ratio – the amount of the assets in the transaction (assets acquired or sold) divided by total assets.

Equity ratio – the increase or decrease in equity divided by the total equity.

Revenue ratio – estimated revenue from the transaction divided by the annual revenue.
Acquisition of assets
Assets ratio – the amount of the assets in the transaction divided by total assets.
Sale of assets
Assets ratio – the amount of the assets in the transaction divided by total assets.
Profit ratio – the profit or loss attributed to the transaction divided by the total annual comprehensive income or loss during the period.
Financial liabilities
Liabilities ratio – the amount of the liabilities in the transaction divided by the total liabilities.
Financing expenses ratio – the expected financing expenses in the specific transaction divided by the total financing expenses in the statement of income.
F - 138

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018

Note 25 - Related and Interested Parties (cont’d)

C.Ordinary transactions that are not exceptional (cont’d)

Manufacturing expenses ratio – the amount of the expenses in the transaction divided by the annual cost of sales.

Profit ratio – the profit or loss attributed to the transaction divided by total annual comprehensive income or loss during the period.


C. Ordinary transactions that are not exceptional (cont'd)
Acquisition and sale of products, services and manufacturing inputs
Revenue ratio – estimated revenue from the transaction divided by the annual revenue, or
Manufacturing expenses ratio – the amount of the expenses in the transaction divided by the annual cost of sales.
(3) The transaction is negligible also from a qualitative point of view. For the purpose of this criterion, it shall be examined whether there are special considerations justifying a special report on the transaction, even if it does not meet the quantitative criteria described above.

(4) In examining the negligibility of a transaction expected to occur in the future, among other things, the probability of the transaction occurring is to be examined.

D.Transactions with related and interested parties

For the year ended December 31
 201620152014
$ millions$ millions$ millions
Sales

35

32

6

Cost of sales (1)

113

127

17

Selling, transport and marketing expenses

7

9

16

Financing expenses (income), net (3)

-

22

48

Management fees to the parent company (2)

1

2

4

    

D. Transactions with related and interested parties

 For the year ended December 31
 201820172016
 $ millions$ millions$ millions

Sales 58 35
Cost of sales 19 97 113
Selling, transport and marketing expenses 7 8 7
Financing expenses (income), net 3 (9)-
General and administrative expenses 1 1 1
Management fees to the parent company 1 1 1

(1)A subsidiary in the SpecialtyPhosphate Solutions segment entered intois engaged in a long-term agreement with PCS, an interested party of the CompanyNutrien, for the acquisition of food food‑quality phosphoric acid. The agreement was signed before the subsidiary was acquired by the Company and is in effect until the end of 2018. In October 2017, the Company signed a new agreement with Nutrien for acquisition of phosphoric acid commencing January 2019 up to 2025. Nutrien was an interested party up to January 2018.

In addition, in 2013, the Company's Board of Directors authorized certain subsidiaries in Israel to purchase electricity from OPC Rotem (a company related to the Company’s controlling shareholder).

(2)In 2011,2013, the Company's Board of Directors authorized certain subsidiaries in Israel to purchase electricity from OPC Rotem (a company related to the Company’s controlling shareholder).
(3)
On January 17, 2018, our Audit and Accounting Committee and our Board of Directors approved, and on April 24, 2018, our General Meeting of the Company’s shareholders approved, athe renewed management agreement betweeneffective retroactively as of January 1, 2018, for an additional term of three years, expiring on December 31, 2020. According to the renewed management agreement, the annual management fee paid to Israel Corporation Ltd.Corp for each calendar year, shall not exceed $1 million plus VAT. Such amount includes the overall value of the cash and its subsidiary, on the one hand, and the Company, on the other hand,equity compensation for the years 2012 until 2014, wherebyservice of our directors whom are office holders of Israel Corp., and any and all prior or other compensation arrangements relating to such directors were cancelled. In addition, the Company will pay Israel Corporation annualrenewed agreement was amended so as to no longer include an increase of management fees in the amountto a threshold of $3.5 million plus VAT as per law. In 2015, the Remuneration Committee,in case an executive chairman of the Board is appointed on behalf of Directors andIsrael Corporation. All other provisions of the management agreement remained unchanged. According to the decision of the General Meeting of our shareholders, the Company’s shareholders approvedAudit & Accounting Committee will annually examine the extensionreasonableness of the management agreement forManagement Fees paid in the years 2015 through 2017, onprevious year against the Management Services actually provided by Israel Corp to the Company in the same terms, except foryear. On February 4 and 25, 2019, the following changes: (1) upon approval ofAudit & Accounting Committee examined the service conditions of the Chairman of the Company’s Board of Directors, as Acting Chairman,management services that were actually rendered in 2018 against the management fees will be reduced to $1 million, plus VAT as per law. If the Chairman of the Company’s Board of Directors is appointed as Acting Chairman,paid in that year and thereafter he ceases to serve and to receive remuneration as Acting Chairman, commencing from that time the management fees will return to $3.5 million, plus VAT as per law; and the management agreement was amended such that it permits the Company to provide equity remuneration to directors that serve and/or will serve from time to time and that are employed by Israel Corporation (such directors do not receive cash remuneration in respect of their service). It is notedconcluded that the Remuneration Committee, the Board of Directors and the General Meeting of the Company’s shareholders approved that equity remuneration that will be granted to directors, as stated, or the economic benefit in respect thereof, shall be transferred to Israel Corporation.fees were reasonable

(3)In April 2016, Bank Leumi L’Israel Ltd. (Leumi), an interested party in ICL, sold its holdings in Israel Corporation’s shares (5.86%). As a result, from the time of the said sale, Leumi ceased to be an interested party in ICL.

F - 139

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018
Note 25 - Related and Interested Parties (cont’d)

D. Transactions with related and interested parties(cont’d)
(4)Subsequent to the date of the report, on
In March 13 and 14, 2017, ICL's Audit and Accounting Committee and its Board of Directors respectively, approved a framework agreement with the controlling shareholder, Israel Corporation Ltd. (hereinafter – Israel Corp.), for three years, according to which Israel Corp. can deposit, occasionally, an amount of up to $ 150$150 million in short-termshort‑term U.S. dollar or shekel deposits in ICL subject to ICL’s will.approval. In August 2017, the terms of the framework agreement were expanded to up to $250 million. The terms and conditions of the deposits, including the interest rate, will be determined on the date of the deposits. The deposits will be received by ICL without security. In fourth quarter of 2017, the Company received short-term loans, in a total amount of $175 million, for a period of 6 months, bearing interest at an annual rate of 1.72%–1.99%, which were repaid in the first quarter of 2018.


Note 25 – Related and Interested Parties (cont’d)

E.(5)Balances
In December 2017, the Company, Oil Refineries Ltd. (a public company controlled by Israel Corporation Ltd.) and OPC Energy Ltd. (a public company that is controlled indirectly by one of the Company’s controlling shareholders) signed individual agreements with interested partiesEnergean Israel Limited for supply of natural gas. The company share will be up to 13 BCM of natural gas over a period of 15 years, in the total amount of about $1.9 billion. For further information see Note 20.

E. Balances with related and interested parties
Composition:
 As at December 31
 20182017
 $ millions$ millions

Other current assets 28 38
   
Other current liabilities 7 191


1) CompositionF - 140:

As at December 31
 20162015
$ millions$ millions
Long-term deposits, net of current maturities-1
Other current assets (*)833
Other current liabilities2033
   

* See D(3) above

2) The Company declares a dollar dividend that is paid partly in NIS, according


Notes to the exchange rate on the effective date. The Company enters hedging transaction in order to hedge the exposure to changes in the dollar/shekel exchange rate. The dividend paid to the Company’s controlling shareholder, Israel Corporation, is made partly based on the exchange rate on the effective date and partly based on the exchange rate on the date of distribution. In addition, the dividend paid to an interested party is made according to the exchange rate on the date of distribution.

Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2018

Note 26 – Group Main Entities

  Ownership interest in its subsidiary and investee companies for the year ended December 31
Name of companyPrincipal location of the company’s activity20182017
ICL Israel Ltd.Israel100.00%100.00%
Dead Sea Works Ltd.Israel100.00%100.00%
Dead Sea Bromine Company Ltd.Israel100.00%100.00%
Rotem Amfert Negev Ltd.Israel100.00%100.00%
Mifalei Tovala Ltd.Israel100.00%100.00%
Dead Sea Magnesium Ltd.Israel100.00%100.00%
Ashli Chemicals (Holland) B.V.Israel100.00%100.00%
Bromine Compounds Ltd.Israel100.00%100.00%
Tetrabrom Technologies Ltd.*Israel0.00%100.00%
Fertilizers and Chemicals Ltd.Israel100.00%100.00%
Iberpotash S.A.Spain100.00%100.00%
Fuentes Fertilizantes S.L.Spain100.00%100.00%
ICL Europe Coöperatief U.A.The Netherlands100.00%100.00%
ICL-IP Europe B.V.The Netherlands100.00%100.00%
ICL IP Terneuzen B.V.The Netherlands100.00%100.00%
ICL Fertilizers Europe C.V.The Netherlands100.00%100.00%
ICL Finance B.V.The Netherlands100.00%100.00%
Everris International B.V.The Netherlands100.00%100.00%
ICL Puriphos B.V.The Netherlands100.00%100.00%
ICL-IP America Inc.United States of America100.00%100.00%
ICL Specialty Products Inc.United States of America100.00%100.00%
Everris N.A. Inc.United States of America100.00%100.00%
Phosphorus Derivatives Inc.**United States of America0.00%100.00%
BK Giulini GmbHGermany100.00%100.00%
ICL Holding Germany GmbHGermany100.00%100.00%
ICL I.P. Bitterfeld GmbHGermany100.00%100.00%
Rovita GmbHGermany100.00%100.00%
Prolactal GmbHAustria100.00%100.00%
Cleveland Potash Ltd.United Kingdom100.00%100.00%
ICL Brasil, Ltda.Brazil100.00%100.00%
ICL (Shanghai) Investment Co. Ltd.China100.00%100.00%
Yunnan Phosphate Haikou Co. Ltd.China50.00%50.00%
Sinobrom Compounds Co. Ltd., ChinaChina75.00%75.00%
ICL Asia Ltd.Hong Kong100.00%100.00%
ICL Trading (HK) Ltd.Hong Kong100.00%100.00%
Allana Potash Afar PLC***Ethiopia100.00%100.00%

*            The company was merged into "Bromine Compounds Ltd.".
**         Company sold.
***       Company in liquidation proceedings.
F - Group Entities

 

The Group’s ownership interest in
it's significant subsidiary and investee

companies for the year ended
December 31

Name of companyPrincipal location of the company’s activity20162015
ICL Israel Ltd.Israel100.00%100.00%
Dead Sea Works Ltd.Israel100.00%100.00%
Dead Sea Bromine Company Ltd.Israel100.00%100.00%
Rotem Amfert Negev Ltd.Israel100.00%100.00%
Mifalei Tovala Ltd.Israel100.00%100.00%
Dead Sea Magnesium Ltd.Israel100.00%100.00%
Ashli Chemicals (Holland) B.V.Israel100.00%100.00%
Bromine Compounds Ltd.Israel100.00%100.00%
Tetrabrom Technologies Ltd.Israel100.00%100.00%
Fertilizers and Chemicals Ltd.Israel100.00%100.00%
I.D.E. Technologies Ltd. *Israel50.00%50.00%
Iberpotash S.A.Spain100.00%100.00%
Fuentes Fertilizantes S.L.Spain100.00%100.00%
ICL Europe Coöperatief U.A.The Netherlands100.00%100.00%
ICL-IP Europe B.VThe Netherlands100.00%100.00%
ICL IP Terneuzen B.VThe Netherlands100.00%100.00%
ICL Fertilizers Europe C.V.The Netherlands100.00%100.00%
ICL Finance B.VThe Netherlands100.00%100.00%
Everris International B.V.The Netherlands100.00%100.00%
ICL Puriphos B.VThe Netherlands100.00%100.00%
Clearon Corp.United States of America0.00%100.00%
Phosphorus Derivatives Inc.United States of America100.00%100.00%
ICL Performance Products LPUnited States of America100.00%100.00%
ICL-IP America IncUnited States of America100.00%100.00%
Everris N.A. Inc.United States of America100.00%100.00%
BK Giulini GmbHGermany100.00%100.00%
ICL Holding Germany GmbHGermany100.00%100.00%
ICL-IP Bitterfeld GmbHGermany100.00%100.00%
Rovita GmbHGermany100.00%100.00%
Prolactal GmbHAustria100.00%100.00%
Cleveland Potash Ltd.United Kingdom100.00%100.00%
ICL Brasil, Ltda.Brazil100.00%100.00%
ICL (Shanghai) Investment Co. Ltd.China100.00%100.00%
Yunnan Phosphate Haikou Co. Ltd.China50.00%50.00%
ICL Asia LtdHong Kong100.00%100.00%
Alana Potash Afar PLCEhiopia100.00%100.00%

*Investee company

F-133

141