UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C., 20549

FORM 20-F


o

~~FORM 20-F~~


	REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR (g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


þ		ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, ~~2007~~

2009


o		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

~~For the transition period from to~~


o		SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission file number 1-14542

ASIA PACIFIC WIRE & CABLE
CORPORATION LIMITED

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

Bermuda

(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

7/Fl. B, No. 132, Sec. 3
Min-Sheng East Road
Taipei, 105, Taiwan
Republic of China

(Address of principal executive offices)

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act.


~~Title for each class~~None ~~Common Shares, par value $0.01 per share~~			~~Name of each exchange on which registered~~ ~~None~~

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act.

None
~~(Title of Class)~~

Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act.

Common Shares
(Title of ~~Classes)~~

Class)

Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer’s classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report.

13,830,769 Common Shares

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yeso

Noþ

If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Yeso Noþ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yesþ No No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yeso Noo

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a ~~well-known seasoned issuer, as defined~~large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule ~~405~~12b-2 of the ~~Securities~~Exchange Act.


Large accelerated Filero		Accelerated filero		Non-accelerated filerþ

Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing: U.S. GAAPþ
International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board~~Yes~~ o Other No o

If ~~this report is an annual or transition report,~~“Other” has been checked in response to the previous question, indicate by check mark ifwhich financial statement item the registrant ~~is not required~~has elected to ~~file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Yes~~ follow. Item 17o Item 18 No o

If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yeso No No þ

SEC. Also note that we provide a cautionary discussion of risks and uncertainties under ~~‘‘Risk Factors’’ beginning on page 6~~the “Risk Factors” section of this ~~report.~~Annual Report. These are factors that we think could cause our actual results to differ materially from expected results. Other factors besides those listed ~~here~~there could also adversely affect us.

This discussion is permitted by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.

OTHER CONVENTIONS

Unless otherwise specified, all references in this Annual Report to ~~‘‘Thailand’’~~��Thailand” are to the Kingdom of Thailand, all references to ~~‘‘Singapore’’~~“Singapore” are to The Republic of Singapore, all references to ~~‘‘Taiwan’’~~“Taiwan” are to Taiwan, The Republic of China, all references to ~~‘‘China’’~~“China” and to the ~~‘‘PRC’’~~“PRC” are to The People’s Republic of China, all references to ~~‘‘Australia’’~~“Australia” are to the Commonwealth of Australia and all references to the ~~‘‘U.S.’’~~“U.S.” are to the United States of America.

Most measurements in this Annual Report are given according to the metric system. Standard abbreviations of metric units (e.g., ~~‘‘mm’’~~“mm” for millimeter) have been employed without definitions. All references in this Annual Report to ~~‘‘tons’’~~“tons” are to metric tons, which are equivalent in weight to 2,204.6 pounds.

With respect to measurements relating to the manufacture of wire and cable products, references to ~~‘‘pkm’’~~“pkm” are to kilometers of twisted pairs of copper wire.


	For the Year Ended December 31,
	2005			2006			2007			2008			2009
	(in thousands, except per share amounts)
Income Statement Data:
Net sales	$	337,262		$	468,117		$	510,841		$	500,798		$	362,231
Cost of sales		(300,656	)		(410,823	)		(465,165	)		(488,048	)		(315,840	)

Gross profit		36,606			57,294			45,676			12,750			46,391
Operating expenses		(26,553	)		(27,612	)		(29,451	)		(29,044	)		(27,855	)
Impairment loss		(3,223	)		(86	)		(95	)		—			(77	)

Operating profit/(loss)		6,830			29,596			16,130			(16,294	)		18,459
Exchange gain/(loss)		(3,137	)		5,464			864			(1,712	)		528
Net interest (expense)		(2,747	)		(5,181	)		(6,063	)		(4,779	)		(2,139	)
Share of net income/(loss) of equity investees		170			73			124			(142	)		(40	)
Gain on liquidation of subsidiary		—			1,801			—			—			568
(Loss)/gain on sale of investment		(259	)		(729	)		35			—			—
Others		829			1,536			2,070			2,859			2,196

Income/(loss) before income taxes and minority interests		1,686			32,560			13,160			(20,068	)		19,572
Income taxes		(3,860	)		(10,257	)		(6,298	)		(2,132	)		(5,344	)
Non-controlling interests		(2,783	)		(9,330	)		(2,029	)		8,551			(4,139	)

Net income/(loss) attributable to APWC	$	(4,957	)	$	12,973		$	4,833		$	(13,649	)	$	10,089

Earnings/(loss) per share⁽¹⁾	$	(0.36	)	$	0.94		$	0.35		$	(0.99	)	$	0.73


	As of December 31,
	2005		2006		2007		2008		2009
	(in thousands)

Balance Sheet Data:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	20,748	$	24,664	$	29,127	$	37,510	$	41,534
Working capital		80,350		108,084		132,409		100,428		127,139
Total assets		262,938		364,565		396,116		309,798		296,052
Total debt		58,438		100,195		104,146		59,694		38,917
Total shareholders’ equity		97,622		118,765		136,783		114,129		127,392

As of December 31,
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
(in thousands)
Balance Sheet Data:
Cash and cash equivalents $ 25,032 $ 24,419 $ 20,748 $ 24,664 $ 29,127
Working capital 71,141 80,152 80,350 108,084 132,409
Total assets 232,176 270,433 262,938 364,565 396,116
Total debt 32,965 57,389 58,438 100,195 104,146
Total shareholders’ equity 107,176 107,146 97,622 118,765 136,783

3.2 Exchange Rates


Year Ended December 31,	At Period End		Average⁽¹⁾		High		Low
	(Bt per $1.00)
2005		40.99		40.34		42.08		38.21
2006		36.10		37.68		40.76		35.19
2007		29.50		32.02		35.96		29.28
2008		34.72		33.13		35.72		29.36
2009		33.33		34.30		36.25		33.10


Month	High		Low
November 2009		33.46		33.11
December 2009		33.37		33.10
January 2010		33.18		32.85
February 2010		33.18		33.00
March 2010		32.84		32.28
April 2010		32.38		32.16


	At
	Period
Year Ended December 31,	End		Average⁽¹⁾		High		Low
	(S$ per $1.00)
2005		1.663		1.665		1.706		1.618
2006		1.534		1.580		1.652		1.534
2007		1.436		1.501		1.543		1.436
2008		1.438		1.410		1.529		1.347
2009		1.404		1.452		1.557		1.380


Month	High		Low
November 2009		1.402		1.380
December 2009		1.408		1.380
January 2010		1.406		1.388
February 2010		1.423		1.405
March 2010		1.406		1.393
April 2010		1.399		1.368

Month High Low
December 2007 1.463 1.436
January 2008 1.438 1.417
February 2008 1.419 1.393
March 2008 1.391 1.378
April 2008 1.385 1.350
May 2008 1.379 1.358

Sources: Federal Reserve Bulletin, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. Federal Reserve Statistical Release H.10(512), from the website of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System at http://www.federalreserve.gov.


Year Ended December 31,	At Period End		Average⁽¹⁾		High		Low
	(Rmb per $1.00)
2005		8.070		8.183		8.277		8.070
2006		7.804		7.958		8.070		7.804
2007		7.295		7.581		7.813		7.295
2008		6.823		6.919		7.295		6.780
2009		6.826		6.830		6.847		6.818


Month	High		Low
November 2009		6.830		6.826
December 2009		6.830		6.824
January 2010		6.830		6.826
February 2010		6.833		6.826
March 2010		6.827		6.825
April 2010		6.828		6.823


Year Ended December 31,	At Period End		Average⁽¹⁾		High		Low
	(A$ per $1.00)
2005		1.362		1.312		1.377		1.254
2006		1.268		1.319		1.417		1.264
2007		1.139		1.184		1.295		1.067


Year Ended December 31,	At Period End		Average⁽¹⁾		High		Low
	(A$ per $1.00)
2008		1.141		1.177		1.647		1.021
2009		1.114		1.252		1.587		1.067


⁽¹⁾		Average means the average of the Noon Buying Rates on the last day of each month during a year.

The high and low exchange rates for the six months preceding the date of this Annual Report were:


Month	High		Low
November 2009		1.113		1.067
December 2009		1.139		1.079
January 2010		1.127		1.075
February 2010		1.160		1.112
March 2010		1.111		1.084
April 2010		1.091		1.069

3.3 Risk Factors
~~3.3.1~~ ~~Potential Illiquidity of Common Shares~~

~~Approximately 75.4%~~

3.3.1 Risks Related to the Global Economic and Financial Crisis

Commencing in early 2008, numerous cataclysmic economic and financial events roiled global and national financial markets and the international business community, including the sudden collapse of ~~our Common Shares are held as restricted securities, which are not publicly registered securities,~~certain leading financial institutions, widespread default on various credit instruments, the collapse of the U.S. and other housing markets, a dramatic de-leveraging of capital investment and other business activities and a marked reduction in the availability of credit for businesses. These events unfolded quite quickly and unexpectedly and are ~~therefore, not freely tradable. In the recent past, the volume of trading in our Common Shares has not been substantial. The illiquidity of your ownership interest~~widely considered to be key factors in the ~~Company may negatively impact~~deep economic recession that adversely impacted the ~~value of your Common Shares.~~


	~~3.3.2~~	~~Control of the Company Rests with Majority Shareholder~~

As the majority shareholder, Pacific Electric Wire & Cable Co., Ltd. (‘‘PEWC’’) has sufficient votes to control the outcome of any matters presented for a shareholder vote. PEWC may vote its shares inglobal economy generally and the Company in ~~the manner that it sees fit. PEWC may also sell, convey or encumber all or a portion of its ownership interest~~particular.

Dramatic declines in the ~~Company without regard~~U.S. housing market in 2008, continuing into 2009, with falling home prices and increasing foreclosures and unemployment, have resulted in significant write-downs of asset values by financial institutions, including government-sponsored entities as well as major commercial and investment banks. These write-downs, initially of mortgage-backed securities but spreading to credit default swaps and other derivative securities, in turn have caused many financial institutions to seek additional capital, to merge with larger and stronger institutions and, in some cases, to fail. Reflecting concern about the ~~best interests~~stability of the financial markets generally and the strength of counterparties, many lenders and institutional investors have ceased to provide, or severely curtailed, funding to even the most credit-worthy borrowers or to other ~~shareholders~~financial institutions. The continuing shortage of available credit and lack of confidence in the financial markets has materially and adversely affected the trading price of the Company except to the extent it may be required to comply with the terms of the Shareholders’ Agreement dated June 28, 2007 (the ‘‘Shareholders Agreement’’) among the Company, PEWC and SOF Investments, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership which owns beneficially 20% of the issued and outstandingCompany’s Common Shares and ~~except that it~~could materially and adversely impact its access to capital and its financial condition.

Continued turbulence in the U.S. and international markets and economy may adversely affect the Company’s liquidity, its ability to access the capital markets, its financial condition and the willingness or ability of certain counterparties to do business with the Company.

While the Company does not engage in ~~conduct oppressive~~trade or business within the United States, its customers and suppliers, and the markets in which the Company engages in its business, are materially affected by the health of the U.S. economy, which in general has global consequences. The financial crisis that started in the United States spread to ~~minority interests under applicable law.~~the economies of other industrialized and developed nations and emerging markets as well. The result was a global downturn in economic activity and a liquidity crisis for many financial institutions and their customers. Credit availability in the markets in which the Company conducts its business was materially reduced.

Actual and Possible Impacts on the Company

The deterioration of economic conditions resulting from the current global financial and credit crisis and economic downturn has and may well continue to adversely affect each of the markets in which the Company sells and distributes its products and provide services. In certain markets, sales have stagnated or even decreased as there has been a reduction in infrastructure development by governmental entities in certain instances and in capital expenditures and construction by private companies in anticipation of the fall in demand in the residential and commercial building markets. Many customers have also delayed their construction projects in the current weak market environment. The reduction in the manufacture of electronic products for export or local consumption has also reduced our sales of enameled wire. Copper prices on the London Metal Exchange (LME) fell from an average monthly high of $8,685 per metric ton in April 2008 to only $3,072 per metric ton in December 2008. In addition, sales towards the end of 2008 and into 2009 decreased due to worldwide economic downturn, thereby increasing our inventory levels at year end. Nevertheless, subsequently as a result of the commodity market’s dynamic nature, the copper prices on the LME have bounced back to $6,648 average in 2009, resulting in a better turnover for the second half of the year. With the fall in copper and commodity prices in the past, customers have sometimes been withholding orders in the expectation that prices may drop further.

The Company experienced the impact of the economic crisis beginning in the second half of 2008 and into first half of 2009, which included lower sales and lower gross margins as compared to the first half of 2008 and the second half of 2007. The lower results in 2009 were primarily due to reduced order flow from customers However, with the re-bound of copper price in 2009, the customers were willing to accept a higher sales price from APWC in the beginning. Revenue for 2009 was $362.2 million, representing a 27.7% decline from 2008. Gross margin in the second half of 2009 decreased slightly by 1.2% as compared to the first half of 2009, primarily due to some pre-determined supply contracts to the customers in the first half. However, sales in the second half of 2009 increased by $60.8 million or 40% as compared to the first half of 2009.

The Company is unable to determine the precise impact of the global economic crisis on its operations and cash flow since results are also affected by factors that are or may be unrelated to the economic crisis, such as the completion of routine purchase cycles by customers and the completion, suspension or termination of large infrastructure projects. However, the Company has concluded that current economic uncertainty has affected and will likely continue to have a significant impact on the Company’s operations and cash flow. Specifically, the operating subsidiaries may encounter greater difficulty in raising new banking facilities and loans to support their working capital requirements in the current environment where banks are less willing to offer new facilities. Governments in certain countries, such as China, Thailand and Singapore, have pledged to increase infrastructure and construction spending to boost or maintain economic growth. Assuming those pledges are acted upon, those developments will likely have a favorable impact on our sales of manufactured products. However, the Company’s results for the first half of 2009 indicate that actual or planned governmental increases in allocations for expenditures on infrastructure development have not yielded any sustainable increase in sales of the Company’s products, particularly when the government’s focus was on additional housing and mass public transportation projects such as, among other things, cross-island passage ways. In addition, the re-bound in the trading prices of many public companies and the increases in major indices on a number of national exchanges since the lows of March 2009 have not translated into a material increase in customer behaviors with either private or government sponsored projects. The Company believes that any efforts to forecast likely future performance with any degree of specificity would be fraught with uncertainty due to the suddenness and severity of the financial crisis. In addition, the apparent recent stabilization of the


	~~3.3.3~~	~~Consolidation of Charoong Thai Group Accounts~~

global capital markets and increase in economic activity cannot be taken as certain indicators that the global recession is over and that sustained economic growth is assured. Accordingly, the Company cautions against placing reliance on any efforts to identify trends for the foreseeable future.

The governments in the countries in which we operate have otherwise predicted slower economic growth for the fiscal year 2010. For purposes of planning and prudent management, the Company is presently anticipating that the extremely challenging and difficult economic conditions that faced the global economy throughout 2009 will ease off to a lesser degree and the internal budget prepared by management as a planning tool for 2010 indicates a moderate increase in sales.

In view of the continuing market challenges facing the Company, and its customers and the markets in which they operate, the Company has taken and continues to implement a number of measures in order to maintain efficient operations. Specifically, the Company has focused increased efforts on collecting its receivables on a timely basis. It is anticipated that some customers will take a longer time to settle their outstanding debts with the Company as they face tightening credit and lower sales themselves, however the Company will actively work with all of its significant customers to reduce collection times and minimize write offs. The Company has also reduced its inventory levels through planned lower raw material purchases while negotiating with suppliers to reduce costs of raw materials and supplies. The Company has focused also on reducing operating costs where practicable, including headcount restraint. In several of the Company’s subsidiaries, headcount increase has been frozen or even reduced and contract staff have been laid off as deemed necessary. Total headcount number for the entire group was reduced by 97 people from a year ago. The Company has hedged copper in Thailand through copper futures contracts in several instances in order to reduce the effect of the current volatility in copper prices on its operations. The Company is also negotiating and close to finalizing with banks for additional loans and credit facilities.

We believe that the successful implementation of these actions has had a positive effect on our cash resources, and we intend to continue these measures in order to preserve our liquidity during this economically challenging period. The Company is seeking to maintain a strong cash position. While none of the Company’s material lines of credit have been terminated, the Company’s subsidiaries may encounter greater difficulty in raising new banking facilities and loans to support their working capital in the current environment where banks are less willing to offer new facilities. As of December 31, ~~2007,~~2009, the Company had available and unused lines of credits from suppliers, banks and other lenders totaling, in the aggregate, approximately $211.2 million. We believe that available and unused amount of credit is sufficient to support our current working capital needs.

The macroeconomic events and those specific to the Company may have a material adverse impact on the Company’s business operations until such time as the global financial crisis has substantially abated and financial and economic conditions have materially improved. The Company notes, however, that the foregoing is subject to a number of unknown variables, including the impact of actions taken or that may be taken in the future by governmental entities to address the capital needs of banks and other financial institutions and to increase the flow of credit to businesses.

3.3.2 Risks Related to the Common Shares and Corporate Governance

Consolidation of Charoong Thai Group Accounts

As of December 31, 2009, the Company effectively owned ~~approximately~~ 50.93% of the issued and outstanding shares of Charoong Thai Wire and Cable Public Company Limited ~~(‘‘~~(“Charoong ~~Thai’’~~Thai”). That percentage ownership constitutes a decrease from the Company’s initial ownership percentage

and is attributable to the exercise of warrants or conversion of convertible securities by third parties. The Company’s present intention is to maintain majority ownership of the voting securities of Charoong Thai. However, there may be circumstances under which the Company cannot maintain majority ownership of Charoong Thai. In the event Charoong Thai determined to make a further offering of voting securities, or securities convertible into or exchangeable for

voting securities, and the Company was not in a position to fund or finance its participation in the offering, the ownership interest of the Company in Charoong Thai could fall below 50%. If the Company’s holding in Charoong Thai were to fall below 50%, the accounts of the Charoong Thai group, which includes all of the Company’s Thailand operations, will not be consolidated but instead will be equity accounted. In such an event, the Company’s accounts will show a ~~fall~~decrease in revenue and most categories of assets and liabilities, ~~wh ich~~which events could have a material adverse effect on the value of ~~your~~the Common Shares.

Potential Illiquidity of Common Shares

Approximately 75.4% of our Common Shares are either unregistered securities or registered securities held by affiliates, which are subject to restrictions on trading. Accordingly, approximately three quarters of our Common Shares are not fully liquid investments. In the recent past, the volume of trading in our Common Shares has not been substantial. This illiquidity may negatively impact the value of the Common Shares.

Control of the Company Rests with Majority Shareholder; Controlled Company Exemption; Risks Related to PEWC

As the majority shareholder, Pacific Electric Wire & Cable Co., Ltd. (“PEWC”) has sufficient votes to control the outcome of any matters presented for a shareholder vote, including the election of the members of the Board of Directors. PEWC may vote its shares in the Company in the manner that it sees fit. In addition, subject to compliance with applicable securities laws, PEWC may sell, convey or encumber all or a portion of its ownership interest in the Company without regard to the best interests of the other shareholders of the Company except to the extent it may be required to comply with the terms of the Amended and Restated Shareholders’ Agreement dated March 27, 2009 among the Company, PEWC and SOF Investments, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership which owns beneficially 9.8% of the issued and outstanding Common Shares, and except that it may not engage in conduct oppressive to minority interests under applicable law.

The Company’s plans include seeking a listing on a national securities exchange, such as Nasdaq or NYSE Amex Equities (formerly known as the American Stock Exchange), as and when the Company meets the listing criteria for one of those exchanges. In the event of a listing on a national securities exchange, the Company intends to rely upon the “controlled company exemption” which will exempt the Company from a requirement to have a board of directors that has a majority of independent directors. The Company may also rely upon Nasdaq Rule 4350(a) or AMEX Company Guide Section 110, each of which would permit the Company to rely in certain instances upon the rules of its home country, Bermuda, which do not require that the board of directors be comprised of a majority of independent directors. Accordingly, even assuming a listing on a national securities exchange, a majority of the Company’s Board may not be comprised of directors independent from any affiliation with the majority shareholder, PEWC.

PEWC, the majority shareholder, is a Taiwanese company engaged in the manufacture and distribution of wire and cable products in the Taiwan markets. In November 2004, certain former officers and directors of PEWC (the “Former Executives”) were indicted by the Taipei District Prosecutors Office for their breach of trust, embezzlement of corporate funds, making of false accounting records and financial statements, and violation of various Taiwan securities laws. The most serious allegations of corporate theft and misappropriation were directed at Mr. Hu, the former chief financial officer of PEWC. As early as 1992, the Former Executives had incorporated a complex network of companies for the purpose of transferring PEWC funds out of Taiwan and of acquiring overseas investments for their personal benefit. In addition, they borrowed loans from banks for their personal benefit and made PEWC a guarantor for such borrowings, which were eventually repaid by PEWC. In an elaborate concealment scheme, the books of PEWC were balanced by way of fictitious bank deposits with certain banks incorporated in Vanuatu and other remote jurisdictions. The fraudulent actions of the Former Executives were uncovered in 2001 and 2002, when PEWC incurred losses attributable to the scheme equal to approximately $160 million and $669 million, respectively. To the best knowledge of the Company, proceedings against the Former Executives are continuing in the Taipei District Court. However, the Company is not a party to, or otherwise involved in, those proceedings.


	~~3.3.4~~	~~Risks Relating to Copper~~

In May 2003, the Taipei Stock Exchange (the “TSE”) and the Taiwan Securities and Futures Commission (“TSFC”) ordered PEWC to restate its 1998-2000 financial statements to reflect the losses attributable to the fraudulent activities of the Former Executives. Thereafter, the TSE suspended the trading of the shares of PEWC. In 2004, the shares of PEWC were delisted from the TSE. At the present time, the shares of PEWC are not traded on a recognized public exchange and there is no public market for the common stock of PEWC. To the Company’s knowledge, the criminal prosecution of at least several of the Former Executives is ongoing and PEWC is pursuing actions in several jurisdictions to recover misappropriated assets.

A consortium of bank creditors (referred to as the “PEWC Banking Group”) has certain veto rights with respect to material acquisitions or expenditures by PEWC. Unresolved issues regarding PEWC raise a degree of uncertainty regarding its capacity in the future to continue to provide support to the Company as it has in the past with regard to inter-company loans, and with regard to research and development and other services under the Composite Services Agreement (discussed below), in each case on terms more favorable than those that might be available from unaffiliated providers.

PEWC has provided credit support to the Company and its subsidiaries through the provision of direct loans, credit terms in inter-company trade balances between PEWC and the operating subsidiaries and corporate guarantees for trade and credit facilities from banks and financial institutions for the purposes of financing working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions and expansion programs. There can be no assurance that PEWC will provide support in the future.

Limited Trading Volume on the OTC BB

Our Common Shares are traded on the over-the-counter bulletin board (the “OTC BB”). Trading in our Common Shares has been limited and there may not exist from time to time an active trading market for our Common Shares. As a consequence, shareholders may find their ability to sell their Common Shares quickly or in substantial amounts is adversely affected by the limited public trading market. Thinly-traded equity can be more volatile than equity securities traded in an active trading market. The high and low price for our Common Shares during the past 24 months has been $6.45 and $0.50, respectively. In the future, our Common Shares may experience significant price fluctuations which could adversely affect the value of the Common Shares.

Disclosure Controls and Procedures and Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

The Company focused on improving its disclosure controls and procedures and its internal control over financial reporting and remediating all material weaknesses, and as a result, both disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting were classified as effective as of December 31, 2008, but ineffective as of December 31, 2009 due to the development of material weaknesses. While the Company is taking steps to remediate the material weakness identified as of December 31, 2009, the Company cannot provide any assurances that other material weaknesses will not be identified upon further investigation, such that either disclosure controls and procedures or internal control over financial reporting may be rendered ineffective for a period of time.

Delinquency in Reporting Obligations; Reporting of Financial Results

As a foreign private issuer, the Company is currently required to file its annual report on Form 20-F with the SEC within six months following the close of its fiscal year. The Company was not in a position to make the filing of its 2004 annual report on a timely basis. After the expiration of an automatic grace period, on August 29, 2005 the OTC BB delisted the Company for failure to remain current in the filing of its periodic reports. On November 9, 2007, the Company filed its 2004 annual report. On March 17, 2008, the Company filed its combined 2005 and 2006 annual report. The Company then relisted on the OTC BB in April 2008 under the symbol “AWRCF.” On June 28, 2008 and June 26, 2009, the Company filed its 2007 and 2008 annual report, respectively, on a timely basis.

The Company is currently compliant with its reporting obligations under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and believes that it has addressed the corporate governance obstacles that led to its delinquency in filing its 2004, 2005 and 2006 annual reports. However, the Company cannot provide assurances that it will continue to be compliant in its reporting obligations under the Exchange Act. As a foreign private issuer, the Company is not required to provide financial results on a quarterly or semi-annual basis. In addition, Bermuda law does not require the Company to provide interim financial information to its shareholders, whether on a quarterly or semi-annual basis. As such, investors may not have the same access to financial information of the Company as they customarily receive in the case of a domestic issuer disclosing quarterly results on a Form 10-Q.

Potential Conflict of Certain Officers and Directors

The Company appointed two independent directors on September 28, 2007. Other than those two independent directors, all of the members of the Board of Directors are also directors or officers or otherwise affiliated with PEWC, the majority shareholder. Certain of our officers are also affiliated with PEWC. In each case, they may be subject to potential conflicts of interest. In addition, certain of our officers and directors who are also officers and/or directors of PEWC may be subject to conflicts of interest in connection with, for example, pursuing corporate opportunities in which we and PEWC or one of its affiliates have competing interests, and the performance by us and PEWC of our respective obligations under existing agreements, including the Composite Services Agreement and the Indemnification Agreement (discussed below). In addition, some of these persons will devote time to the business and affairs of PEWC and its affiliates as is appropriate under the circumstances, which could reduce the amount of time available for overseeing or managing our business and affairs. Notwithstanding any such potential conflicts, however, such individuals, in their capacities as our directors and officers, are subject to fiduciary duties to our shareholders.

The Bermuda Companies Act 1981, as amended (the “Companies Act”), subjects our officers and directors to certain fiduciary standards in the exercise of their executive and management duties on behalf of the Company. Under the Companies Act, an officer of ours (which term includes our directors) is subject to a duty of care requiring him to act honestly, in good faith and in the best interests of the Company in the discharge of his duties and to, among other things, give notice to the Board of Directors at the first opportunity of any interest he has in any material contract or proposed material contract with us or any of our subsidiaries. The Companies Act also prohibits us, subject to certain exceptions, from making loans to any directors without first obtaining the consent of shareholders holding in the aggregate not less than nine-tenths of the total voting rights of all the shareholders having the right to vote at any shareholders meeting. We do not make any loans to our directors or executive officers in accordance with the provisions of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Obligations under the Amended and Restated Shareholders Agreement

On June 28, 2007, SOF Investments, L.P. (“SOF”), a Delaware limited partnership, acquired 2,766,154 Common Shares, representing 20% of the issued and outstanding Common Shares (the “SOF Shares”), from Sino-JP Fund Ltd (“Sino-JP”). Following that sale, Sino-JP ceased to have any ownership interest in the Company and its three designees on the Board of Directors and the Company officers selected by it each resigned with immediate effect. On that same date, the Company entered into the Shareholders Agreement with PEWC and SOF, pursuant to which the Company granted to SOF certain rights and protections. Under the Shareholders Agreement, the Company agreed to indemnify SOF and its partners and certain of its affiliates (the “SOF Indemnified Persons”), for any additional taxes, interest, penalties and other costs that might be imposed upon or incurred by the SOF Indemnified Persons in the event that the Company is determined by the Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) to be a “controlled foreign corporation” (a “CFC”) or a “passive foreign investment company” (a “PFIC”), as such terms are interpreted and defined under IRS rules and regulations. The Company does not believe that it is now or is likely to become a CFC or a PFIC; however, the Company cannot provide any assurances that it will not become a CFC or a PFIC in the future.

In addition, the Company granted certain registration rights to SOF with respect to the SOF Shares (the “Registrable Securities”) in the Shareholders Agreement. In particular, the Company agreed to use its

reasonable best efforts to prepare and file, and cause to go effective, as soon as practicable, a shelf registration statement covering the resale of the Registrable Securities on a delayed or continuous basis. The Company also agreed to use its reasonable best efforts to keep its shelf registration statement effective until all Registrable Securities have been sold or until all Registrable Securities may be sold without restriction pursuant to Rule 144 promulgated pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. In addition, the Company granted to SOF two demand registration rights for underwritten offerings and customary piggyback registration rights with regard to the Registrable Securities. Moreover, the Company agreed to use its reasonable best efforts to cause the Common Shares to be listed on a national “Securities Market,” which means any of the Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc. (Global Market or Global Select Market), the American Stock Exchange LLC (now known as NYSE Amex Equities) or the New York Stock Exchange LLC, not later than January 31, 2009, subject to notice and a sixty (60) day cure period. All of the costs and expenses of the Company in connection with the fulfillment of its obligations under the Shareholders Agreement were to be paid by the Company, other than underwriting fees, discounts and commissions attributable to the sale of Common Shares held by SOF.

Under the terms of the Shareholders Agreement, if the Company failed to fulfill its obligations thereunder, SOF may have a claim for damages against the Company. No such claim has been made. In addition, if the Company fulfilled its reasonable best efforts undertakings but failed to meet one or more of the stated goals, SOF may have a put right of their Common Shares to PEWC. In accordance with those terms, on February 2, 2009, SOF delivered to PEWC notice of its exercise of the put right under the Shareholders Agreement due to the fact that the Common Shares were not listed on a national Securities Market as of January 31, 2009. On March 27, 2009, SOF sold 51% of its Common Shares to PEWC pursuant to the terms of a share purchase agreement between those parties. Upon the consummation of that share purchase agreement, SOF held 1,355,415 registered Common Shares of the Company and PEWC held 1,410,739 registered Common Shares, respectively, representing 9.8% and 10.2% of the outstanding Common Shares, with PEWC holding an additional 7,664,615 unregistered Common Shares, giving it an aggregate of 65.6% of the total issued and outstanding Common Shares. In connection with this transaction, the Company, PEWC and SOF entered into an Amended and Restated Shareholders Agreement, which among other things, granted to the Company an extension for listing the Common Shares on a national Securities Market until February 2011 and maintains for SOF the right to sell its remaining Common Shares to PEWC in the event the Company does not list its Common Shares on a national Securities Market by February 2011. The Amended and Restated Shareholders Agreement also provides for those registration and indemnification rights set forth above in the description of the Shareholders Agreement. While the sale of Common Shares by SOF to PEWC resulted in PEWC holding a higher concentration of Common Shares which may impact liquidity for the other shareholders, the Company does not believe that any definitive impact can be forecasted or determined.

In addition, sales of Common Shares held by SOF and registered under the shelf registration statement, or any registration statement that goes effective following an exercise of demand registration rights, will increase the number of Common Shares available for purchase in the public market and may adversely affect the value of the Common Shares held by other shareholders. Even without substantial sales by SOF or PEWC of their respective Registrable Securities, the possibility of such sales may create a “market overhang” that has the effect of depressing the trading price of the Common Shares.

The Company has also granted to SOF preemptive rights in the event of any issuance of additional equity securities (or securities convertible into or exchangeable for equity securities) by the Company, such that SOF may subscribe for additional securities in order to maintain its then percentage ownership interest in the issued and outstanding equity securities of the Company.

Risks Relating to the Settlement Agreement

Following the acquisition by Sino-JP in 2004 of Common Shares of the Company, a number of disputes arose between PEWC and Sino-JP regarding the governance of the Company and other matters. Specifically, the Board was unable to reach a consensus on the proper treatment of certain doubtful accounts receivable. In addition, the then current Chief Financial Officer of the Company questioned the then current auditors of the

Company regarding the thoroughness of their review of these accounts receivable during the course of their 2004 audit of the Company’s financial statements, which led to the cessation of the 2004 audit by the auditors at that time. The initial narrow dispute between Board members designated by Sino-JP and other Board members regarding the accounting treatment for doubtful accounts receivable grew in scope, such that it became very difficult to achieve a consensus on a number of strategic and operational matters, due to the effective veto right held by the Sino-JP Board designees. On June 28, 2007, the date of the purchase by SOF of the SOF Shares from Sino-JP and the date of the Shareholders Agreement among the Company, PEWC and SOF, the Company and Sino-JP also entered into a comprehensive settlement and release agreement (the “Settlement Agreement”), which dismissed and released all claims between the parties and which put an end to all related litigation. Separately, PEWC also entered into a settlement and release agreement that terminated all disputes and litigation between those parties. Upon the closing of the purchase agreement for the SOF Shares and the Settlement Agreement, all of the directors and officers of the Company designated by Sino-JP submitted their resignations and Sino-JP ceased to have any interest in the Company. As part of the Settlement Agreement, the Company agreed to indemnify all of those Sino-JP designated directors and officers (the “Sino-JP Indemnified Persons”) for all acts or omissions taken in their capacity as a director or officer to the maximum extent permitted under the memorandum of association and the Bye-laws of the Company and the Companies Act. While the Company does not have any knowledge of any claims having been, or threatened to be, asserted against any of the Sino-JP Indemnified Persons, the Company could incur significant costs in the event any claims are asserted or actions commenced against any of the Sino-JP Indemnified Persons for matters within the scope of the indemnification provisions of the Settlement Agreement.

Holding Company Structure; Potential Restrictions on the Payment of Dividends

We have no direct business operations other than our ownership of the capital stock of our subsidiaries and joint venture holdings. While we have no present intention to pay dividends, should we decide in the future to do so, as a holding company, our ability to pay dividends and meet our other obligations will depend upon the amount of distributions, if any, received from our operating subsidiaries and other holdings and investments. Our operating subsidiaries and other holdings and investments, from time to time, may be subject to restrictions on their ability to make distributions to us, including as a result of restrictive covenants contained in loan agreements, restrictions on the conversion of local currency earnings into U.S. dollars or other hard currency and other regulatory restrictions. For example, PRC legal restrictions permit payments of dividends by our business entities in the PRC only out of their retained earnings, if any, determined in accordance with relevant PRC accounting standards and regulations. Under PRC law, such entities are also required to set aside a portion of their net income each year to fund certain reserve funds. These reserves are not distributable as cash dividends. The foregoing restrictions may also affect our ability to fund operations of one subsidiary with dividends and other payments received from another subsidiary.

Requirement to Maintain Effectiveness of the Registration Statement and to List on a National Securities Exchange; Effect of the Put of the SOF Shares to PEWC

Under the Amended and Restated Shareholders Agreement, SOF has retained the right to sell its remaining Common Shares (the “SOF Shares”) to PEWC if the Company does not achieve a listing on a national Securities Market within the time frame provided in the agreement. In addition, the Company has agreed to maintain the effectiveness of the registration statement on Form F-1, for the benefit of SOF, and if the Company fails to do so for any period of thirty (30) consecutive trading days or an aggregate of sixty (60) trading days during any twelve month period, then SOF may, subject to compliance with notice and other procedural requirements, exercise a right to sell its remaining Common Shares to PEWC. At all times, the Company must exercise its reasonable best efforts to comply with its covenants under the Amended and Restated Shareholders Agreement. Otherwise, the Company could be subject to a damages claim by SOF. The Company is using its diligent efforts to bring and maintain current the financial disclosure in the registration statement on Form F-1 covering the SOF Shares and the registered Common Shares held by PEWC.

On February 2, 2009, SOF delivered notice of its exercise of the put right under the Shareholders Agreement to PEWC due to the fact that the Common Shares were not listed on a national Securities Market as of January 31, 2009, which date was agreed to by the Company prior to the extension granted under the Amended and Restated Shareholders Agreement. On March 27, 2009, PEWC and SOF completed a share purchase transaction pursuant to which PEWC acquired 1,410,739 Common Shares from SOF. As of the closing of that transaction, PEWC held 9,075,354 Common Shares and SOF held 1,355,415 Common Shares, representing 65.6% and 9.8% of the issued and outstanding Common Shares, respectively. The Company does not believe that any definitive impact of the increase in PEWC’s ownership can be forecasted or determined.

Corporate Matters; Limited Recourse; Limited Enforceability

We are incorporated in and organized pursuant to the laws of Bermuda. In addition, all of our directors and officers reside outside the United States and our material assets are located outside the United States. As a result, it may be difficult for investors to effect service of process within the United States upon such persons or to realize against them in courts of the United States upon judgments predicated upon civil liabilities under the United States federal securities laws. Even if investors are successful in realizing against such persons in courts of the United States, the laws of Taiwan may render such investors unable to enforce the judgment against the Company’s assets or the assets of its officers and directors. Also, investors may have difficulty in bringing an original action based upon the United States federal securities law against such persons in the Taiwan courts. Additionally, we have been advised by our legal counsel in Bermuda, Appleby, that there is doubt as to the enforcement in Bermuda, in original actions or in actions for enforcement of judgments of United States courts, of liabilities predicated upon U.S. federal securities laws, although Bermuda Courts will enforce foreign judgments for liquidated amounts in civil matters subject to certain conditions and exceptions. As a result, shareholders may encounter more difficulties in enforcing their rights and protecting their interests in the face of actions taken by management, the Board of Directors or controlling shareholders than they would if the Company were organized under the laws of the United States or one of the states therein, or if the Company had material assets located within the United States or some of the directors and officers were resident within the United States. See “Enforceability of Certain Civil Liabilities” for additional information.

3.3.3 Risks Relating to Our Business

Risks Relating to Copper

Copper is the principal raw material we use, accounting for a majority of the cost of sales. We purchase copper at prices based on the average prevailing international spot market prices on the London Metal Exchange (the ~~‘‘LME’’~~“LME”) for copper for the one month prior to purchase. The price of copper is affected by numerous factors beyond our control, including international economic and political conditions, supply and demand, inventory levels maintained by suppliers, actions of participants in the commodities markets and currency exchange rates. As with other costs of production, changes in the price of copper may affect the Company’s cost of sales. Whether this has a material impact on our operating margins and financial results depends primarily on the Company’s ability to adjust ~~charges~~selling prices to its customers, such that increases and decreases in the price of copper are fully reflected in those ~~charges. The~~ selling ~~price~~prices. Most of our ~~pro ducts is based in part on~~sales of manufactured products reflect the cost of copper used to manufacture those ~~products.~~products at the time the products are ordered. In ~~addition, in~~ the ordinary course of business we maintain inventories of raw materials and finished products reasonably necessary for the conduct of our business. These inventories typically reflect the cost of copper prevailing in the market at the time of purchase. ~~Most of our sales of manufactured products reflect copper prices prevailing at the time the products are ordered.~~ A long-term decrease in the price of copper would require the Company to revalue its inventory at periodic intervals to the then net realizable value, which could be below cost. Copper prices have been subject to considerable volatility and it is not always possible to manage our copper purchases and inventory so as to neutralize the impact of copper price volatility. Accordingly, significant volatility in copper prices could have an adverse effect on our operations. No assurance can be given that such volatility will not recur. ~~See Section 11.3: &lsqu o;‘~~

Risks related to our Customer Base and our Geographic Markets

Our sales of manufactured and distributed products are made primarily to customers that use our products as components in their own products or in construction or infrastructure projects in which they participate. The volume of our sales is dependent largely on general economic conditions in the markets in which we compete, including how much our customers invest in their own product manufacturing or project development. Decreases in economic activity and investment in the markets where we operate generally will result in lower sales volume and lower net income for the Company.

Risks Relating to ~~Copper’’ for additional information.~~
~~3.3.5~~ ~~Risks Relating to China~~

China

We conduct substantial business operations in China. Accordingly, our results of operations and prospects are likely to be materially impacted by economic, legal and other developments in China.

Economic Reform Measures in the PRC May Adversely Affect the Company’s Operations or Financial Condition

In recent years, the PRC government has implemented economic reform measures emphasizing decentralization, utilization of market forces in the development of the economy and a high level of management autonomy. While such economic reform measures are generally viewed as a positive development for foreign businesses investing or establishing operations in China, the reforms are at an early stage and there is not sufficient administrative or judicial precedent to permit the Company to determine with any degree of certainty how the reforms will impact our business in China.

PRC Civil Law System May Limit the Company’s Remedies

The Chinese legal system is a civil law system based on written statutes. Prior court decisions may be cited for reference but have limited precedential value. Since 1979, the central government has promulgated laws and regulations dealing with economic matters such as foreign investment, corporate organization and governance, commerce, taxation and trade. In particular, legislation over the past decades has significantly enhanced the protections afforded to various forms of foreign investment in China. As foreign investment laws and regulations in China are relatively new and because of the limited volume of published decisions and their non-binding nature, the interpretations of many laws, regulations and rules are not always uniform and enforcement of these laws, regulations and rules involves uncertainties, which may limit the remedies available to us in the event of any claims or

disputes with third parties. In addition, any litigation in China may be protracted and could result in substantial costs and diversion of resources and management attention.

PRC Control over the Convertibility of Currency May Restrict the Payment of Dividends

The PRC government imposes controls on the convertibility of the Renminbi into foreign currencies and, in certain cases, the remittance of currency out of China. Under existing PRC foreign exchange regulations, payments of current account items, including profit distributions, interest payments and expenditures from trade related transactions, can be made in foreign currencies without prior approval from the State Administration of Foreign Exchange ~~(‘‘SAFE’’~~(“SAFE”) by complying with certain procedural requirements. However, approval from SAFE or its local branch is required where Renminbi is to be converted into foreign currency and remitted out of China to pay capital expenses such as the repayment of loans denominated in foreign currencies. The PRC government may also at its discretion restrict access in the future to foreign currencies for current account transactions. Shortages in the availability of foreign currency may restrict the ~~abilit y~~ability of our subsidiaries in the PRC to remit sufficient foreign currency to pay dividends or other payments to us, or otherwise satisfy their foreign currency-denominated obligations.

PRC Regulation of Telecommunications Industry May Adversely Affect the Company’s Operations or Financial Condition

In addition, the PRC government has considerable control over the structure and overall development of the telecommunications industry in the PRC. Purchasers of our telecommunications cable in China are subject to extensive regulation by and under the supervision of the ~~Ministry of Information and Industry (the ‘‘MII’’), which is the~~ primary telecommunications industry regulator in ~~China.~~China, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (the “MIIT”), which was created by the State Council of the PRC in March 2008 to assume, among other things, the duties of the former Ministry of Information Industry. The ~~MII~~MIIT is responsible for formulating policies and regulations for the telecommunications industry, granting telecommunications licenses, allocating frequency spectrum and numbers, formulating interconnection and settlement arrangements between telecommunications operators, and enforcing industry regulations. Other PRC governmental authorities also regulate tariff policies, capital investment and foreign investment in the telecommunications industry. As a result of its accession to the World Trade Organization ~~(‘‘WTO’’~~(“WTO”) and the ~~a doption~~adoption of the Regulations on the Administration of Foreign-Invested Telecommunications Enterprises in January 2002, which implement its commitments to the WTO, the Chinese government has agreed to gradually liberalize the various segments and regions of the telecommunications market to foreign telecommunications operators. Currently, however, the ~~MII~~MIIT has only granted licenses to operate fixed-line telecommunications networks (which use our telecommunications cables) to certain domestic entities. As a result, the business of our companies in China may be more dependent on the political stability of the country and continuity of government policy than if there were more consumers of telecommunications cable and if the government-related entities were not so closely involved in the telecommunications industry. Future changes to the regulations and policies governing the telecommunications industry in China, including possible future industry restructurings, may have a material adverse effect on our business.

Political or Social Instability in the PRC May Adversely Affect the Company’s Operations or Financial Condition

Political or social instability in China could also adversely affect our business operations or financial condition. In particular, adverse public health epidemics or pandemics in China could not only interfere with our ability to operate our PRC subsidiaries, but could also affect the country’s overall economic growth, which could in turn affect the sales of our products in China. In addition, as our corporate headquarters are ~~now~~ located in Taipei, any escalation in political tensions between the PRC and the government of Taiwan could impact adversely our ability to manage our Chinese operations efficiently or without third party interference.

Inflation in the PRC May Adversely Affect the Company’s Operations or Financial Condition

The rapid growth of the PRC economy has historically resulted in high levels of inflation. If the government tries to control inflation, it may have an adverse effect on the business climate and growth of private enterprise in the PRC. An economic slowdown may increase our costs. If inflation is significant, our costs would likely increase, and there can be no assurance that we would be able to increase our prices to an extent that would offset the increase in our expenses.

PRC Power Shortages and Lack of Insurance May Adversely Affect the Company’s Operations or Financial Condition

We consume substantial amounts of electricity in our manufacturing processes at our production facilities in China. Certain parts of China have been subject to power shortages in recent years. We have experienced a number of power shortages at our production facilities in China to date. We are sometimes given advance notice of power shortages and in relation to this we currently have a backup power system at certain of our production facilities in China. However, there can be no assurance that in the future our backup power system will be completely effective in the event of a power shortage,

particularly if that power shortage is over a sustained period of time and/or we are not given advance notice thereof. Any power shortage, brownout or

blackout for a significant period of time may disrupt our manufacturing, and as a result, may have an adverse impact on our business.

The insurance industry in China is still at an early stage of development. In particular, PRC insurance companies do not offer extensive business insurance products. As a result, we do not have any business liability or disruption insurance coverage for our operations in China. Any business disruption, litigation or natural disaster might result in our incurring substantial costs and the diversion of resources.

We note that we consume substantial amounts of electricity in our manufacturing processes at our production facilities in China. Certain parts of China have been subject to power shortages in recent years. We have experienced a number of power shortages at our production facilities in China to date. We are sometimes given advance notice of power shortages and we currently have a backup power system at certain of our production facilities in China.

PRC Tax Treatments May Adversely Affect the Company’s Operations or Financial Condition

Certain of our PRC companies enjoy preferential tax treatments, in the form of reduced tax rates or tax holidays, provided by the PRC government or its local agencies or bureaus. On March 16, 2007, the National People’s Congress of the PRC, or NPC, passed the new PRC Enterprise Income Tax Law ~~or New~~(the “New EIT ~~Law.~~Law”). Under the New EIT Law, effective January 1, 2008, China adopted a uniform tax rate of 25% for all enterprises (including foreign-invested enterprises) and revoked the then current tax exemption, reduction and preferential treatments applicable to foreign-invested enterprises. However, there is a transition period for enterprises, whether foreign-invested or domestic, that were receiving preferential tax treatments granted by relevant tax authorities at the time the New EIT Law became effective. Enterprises that are subject to an enterprise income tax, or EIT, rate lower than 25% may continue to enjoy the lower rate and gradually ~~tr ansition~~transition to the new tax rate within five years after the effective date of the New EIT Law. Enterprises that are currently entitled to exemptions or reductions from the standard income tax rate for a fixed term may continue to enjoy such treatment until the fixed term expires. Preferential tax treatments will continue to be granted to industries and projects that are strongly supported and encouraged by the state, and enterprises otherwise classified as such ~~‘‘encouraged’’~~“encouraged” high-tech enterprises will be entitled to a 15% EIT rate. On April 14, 2008, the Measures for the Recognition and Administration of New and High-tech Enterprises ~~or the Measures,~~(the “Measures”), were promulgated jointly by the Ministry of Science and Technology of the PRC, the Ministry of Finance of the PRC and the State Administration of Taxation of the PRC and became retroactively effective from January 1, 2008. Under the Measures, the term ~~‘‘high-tech enterprise’’~~“high-tech enterprise” is defined as a ~~resi dent~~resident enterprise that has been registered in the PRC (excluding Hong Kong, Macao or Taiwan) for more than one year, conducts business in the new and high-tech fields encouraged by government as listed in an appendix to the Measures, continuously undertakes research and development and technology conversion, and relies on self-owned intellectual property rights as the basis of its business operation. Such new and high-tech enterprises may apply for tax incentives.

Pacific Electric Wire & Cable (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. (“PEWS”) is the only subsidiary of the Company in the PRC that qualifies for these tax incentives provided under the Measures. The income tax rate of PEWS under the revised tax incentive regulations was 20% in 2009, and is scheduled to be 22% in 2010, 24% in 2011 and 25% in 2012.

The New EIT Law and any other changes to our effective tax rate could have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. We cannot assure you that we will continue to enjoy these preferential tax treatments in the future. The discontinuation or reduction of these preferential tax treatments or government financial incentives could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.


	~~3.3.6~~	~~Disclosure Controls and Procedures and Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting Classified as Ineffective~~

Recent Labor Law Legislation in the PRC May Adversely Affect the Company’s Operations or Financial Condition

In ~~2004 and continuing into 2005,~~June 2007, the Company conducted an internal review regarding certain past and present financial and accounting practices with the assistance of an internationally-recognized forensic accounting firm. The internal review examined the adequacyNational People’s Congress of the ~~Company’s disclosure controls~~PRC enacted new labor law legislation called the Labor Contract Law, which became effective on January 1, 2008. It formalizes workers’ rights concerning

overtime hours, pensions, layoffs, employment contracts and ~~procedures. As~~the role of trade unions. Considered one of the ~~end of 2006, management and the Company’s forensic accounting advisors identified the following material weaknesses:~~


	•	~~Lack of documented policies and procedures governing the Company’s accounting policies, internal control and code of conduct;~~


	•	~~Lack of an adequate internal audit function;~~


	•	~~Need for improvement in monthly financial statement close process for the Company and its subsidiaries to allow timely financial reporting;~~


	•	~~Need for greater U.S. GAAP and tax expertise to identify potential accounting and taxation issues that have a material impact on the Company; and~~


	•	~~Lack of credit control policies at certain subsidiaries.~~

The Company engaged a consultant to advise and assist on establishing an internal audit department and to assist in establishing and maintaining satisfactory disclosure controls and procedures. However, the Company has not completed this process and, as a result, under applicable regulatory guidance, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2007 are required to be classified as ineffective. The Company is focused on improving its disclosure controls and procedures and is confident that these material weaknesses will no longer exist as of December 31, 2008 as long as the Company’s personnel properly implement and adhere to all remediation plans adopted by the Company.

In addition, the Company engaged a consultant to assist the Company’s management, including its Chief Executive Officer (‘‘CEO’’) and Interim Chief Financial Officer (‘‘CFO’’), in evaluating the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007. As a result of that assessment, management, including our CEO and CFO, identified four material weaknesses and certain significant deficienciesstrictest labor laws in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting as of that assessment date. As a result, under applicable regulatory guidance, the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting as of that assessment date are also required to be classified as ineffective. Those material weaknesses were reported by our CEO and CFO to the Company’s Board of Directors, its Audit Committee and its independent auditors, and those significant deficiencies were reported by our CEO and CFO to the Audit Committee and the independent auditors.

At a meeting held on June 13, 2008, the Company’s Board of Directors implemented certain remedial actions which the Company believes, once fully implemented, will address satisfactorily those material weaknesses identified by our CEO and CFO. However, the Company cannot provide any assurances that those actions will be sufficient or that other material weaknesses will not be identified upon further investigation, such that internal controls over financial reporting may continue to be classified as ineffective, or, if rendered effective for a period of time, may not in the future cease to be effective.

The certifications provided as part of this Annual Report by our Chief Executive Officer and by our Chief Financial Officer are subject to and qualified by the disclosures and discussion in this Annual Report on the lack of adequate disclosure controls and procedures and on the lack of effectiveness, as of December 31, 2007, of the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting.

See Item 15: ‘‘Controls and Procedures’’ for a more detailed description of the aforementioned material weaknesses and significant deficiencies and the remedial measures to be taken in connection with those weaknesses.


	~~3.3.7~~	~~Potential Conflict of Certain Officers and Directors~~

The Company appointed two independent directors on September 28, 2007. Other than those two independent directors, all of the members of the Board are also directors or officers or otherwise affiliated with PEWC, the majority shareholder. Certain of our officers are also affiliated with PEWC. In each case, they may be subject to potential conflicts of interest. In addition, certain of our officers and directors who are also officers and/or directors of PEWC may be subject to conflicts of interest in connection with, for example, pursuing corporate opportunities in which we and PEWC or one of its affiliates have competing interests, and the performance by us and PEWC of our respective obligations under existing agreements, including the Composite Services Agreement and the Indemnification Agreement (discussed below in Section 10.2). In addition, some of these persons will devote time to the business and affairs of PEWC and its affiliates as is appropria te under the circumstances, which could reduce the amount of time available for overseeing or managing our business and affairs. Notwithstanding any such potential conflicts, however, such individuals, in their capacities as our directors and officers, are subject to fiduciary duties to our shareholders.

The Bermuda Companies Act 1981, as amended (the ‘‘Companies Act’’), subjects our officers and directors to certain fiduciary standards in the exercise of their fiduciary duties on our behalf. Under

the Companies Act, an officer of ours (which term includes our directors) is subject to a duty of care requiring him to act honestly, in good faith and in the best interests of the Company in the discharge of his duties and to,world, among other things, ~~give notice~~this new law requires an employer to conclude an “open-ended employment contract” with any employee who either has worked for the ~~Board at the first opportunity of any interest he~~employer for ten years or more or has had two consecutive fixed-term contracts. An “open-ended employment contract” is in ~~any~~effect a lifetime, permanent contract, which is terminable only in specified circumstances, such as a material contract or proposed material contract with us or any of our subsidiaries. The Companies Act also prohibits us, subject to certain exceptions, from making loans to any directors without first obtaining the consent of shareholders holding in the aggregate not less than nine-tenthsbreach of the ~~total voting rights~~employer’s rules and regulations, or for a serious dereliction of ~~all the shareholders having the right to vote at any shareholders meeting. As of May 31, 2004, we do~~duty. Such employment contracts with qualifying workers would not ~~make any loans to our directors or executive officers in accordance with the provisions of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.~~


	~~3.3.8~~	~~Obligations under Shareholders Agreement~~

On June 28, 2007, SOF Investments, L.P. (‘‘SOF’’), a Delaware limited partnership, acquired 2,766,154 Common Shares, representing 20% of the issued and outstanding Common Shares (the ‘‘SOF Shares’’), from Sino-JP Fund Ltd (‘‘Sino-JP’’). Following that sale, Sino-JP ceased to have any ownership interest inbe terminable if, for example, the Company ~~and~~determined to downsize its three designees on the Board of Directors and the Company officers selected by it each resigned with immediate effect. On that same date, the Company entered into the Shareholders Agreement with PEWC and SOF, pursuant to which the Company granted to SOF certain rights and protections. Under the Shareholders Agreement, the Company has agreed to indemnify SOF and its partners and certain of its affiliates (the ‘‘SOF Indemnified Persons’’), for any additional taxes, interest, penalties and other costs that might be imposed upon or incurred by the SOF Indemnified Persons in the event that the Company is determined by the Internal Revenue Service (the ‘‘IRS’’) to be a ‘‘controlled foreign corporation’’ (a ‘‘CFC’’) or a ‘‘passive foreign investment company’’ (a ‘‘PFIC’’), as such terms are interpreted and defined under IRS rules or regulations. The Company does not believe that it is now or is likely to become a CFC or a PFIC; however, the Company cannot provide any assurances that it will not become a CFC or a PFIC in the future.

In addition, the Company has granted certain registration rights to SOF with respect to the SOF Shares referred to in the Shareholders Agreement as (the ‘‘Registrable Securities’’) acquired by SOF from Sino-JP. In particular, the Company has agreed to use its reasonable best efforts to prepare and file, and cause to go effective, as soon as practicable, a shelf registration statement covering the resale of the Registrable Securities on a continuous basis. In addition, the Company has granted to SOF two demand registration rights for underwritten offerings and customary piggyback registration rights with regard to the Registrable Securities. Moreover, the Company has agreed that, not later than January 31, 2009, it shall have used its reasonable best efforts to cause the Common Shares to be listed on a national ‘‘Securities Market,’’ which means any of the Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc. (Global Market or G lobal Select Market), the American Stock Exchange LLC or the New York Stock Exchange LLC. All of the costs and expenses of the Company in connection with the fulfillment of its obligations under the Shareholders Agreement are to be paid by the Company, other than underwriting fees, discounts and commissions attributable to the sale of Registrable Securities.

~~The Company has also granted to SOF preemptive rights~~workforce in the event of ~~any issuance~~an economic downturn. Under the new law, downsizing by 20% or more may occur only under specified circumstances, such as a restructuring undertaken pursuant China’s Enterprise Bankruptcy Law, or where a company suffers serious difficulties in production and/or business operations. Any of ~~additional equity securities (or securities convertible into or exchangeable for equity securities)~~the Company’s staff employed to work exclusively within the PRC are covered by the ~~Company, such that SOF may subscribe for additional securities~~new law and thus, the Company’s ability to adjust the size of its operations when necessary in ~~order to maintain its then percentage ownership interest in the issued and outstanding equity securities~~periods of ~~the Company.~~

~~If the Company fails to fulfill its obligations under the Shareholders Agreement, SOF may have a claim for damages against the Company~~recession or less severe economic downturns has been curtailed. Accordingly, if the Company ~~fulfills its reasonable best efforts undertakings but fails~~faces future periods of decline in business activity generally or adverse economic periods specific to ~~meet one or more~~the Company’s business, this new law can be expected to exacerbate the adverse effect of the ~~stated goals, SOF~~economic environment on the Company’s results of operations and financial condition. Additionally, this new labor law has affected labor costs of our customers which may ~~have~~result in a put right of its Common Shares to PEWC, either of which events may adversely impact the value of your Common Shares. See Section 4.1.2: ‘‘Recent Developments’’; see also the Shareholders Agreement fordecrease in such customers’ production and a ~~complete statement of the obligations of the Company under that agreement.~~


	~~3.3.9~~	~~Risks Relating to the Settlement Agreement.~~

~~Following the acquisition by Sino-JP in 2004 of Common Shares of the Company, a number of disputes arose between PEWC and Sino-JP regarding the governance of the Company and other~~

matters. On June 28, 2007, the date of the purchase by SOF of the SOF Shares from Sino-JP and the date of the Shareholders Agreement among the Company, PEWC and SOF, the Company and Sino-JP also entered into a comprehensive settlement and release agreement (the ‘‘Settlement Agreement’’), which dismissed and released all claims between the parties and which put an end to all related litigation. Separately, PEWC also entered into a settlement and release agreement that terminated all disputes and litigation between those parties. Upon the closing of the purchase agreement for the SOF Shares and the Settlement Agreement, all of the directors and officers of the Company designated by Sino-JP submitted their resignations and Sino-JP ceased to have any interest in the Company. As part of the Settlement Agreement, the Company agreed to indemnify all of those Sino-JP designated directors and officers (the ‘‘Sino-JP Indemnified Persons’’) for all acts or omiss ions takencorresponding decrease in their ~~capacity as a director or officer~~purchase of our products.

Exposure to the maximum extent permitted under the memorandum of association and the Bye-laws of the Company and the Bermuda Companies Act. The Company could incur significant costs in the event any claims are asserted or actions commenced against any of the Sino-JP Indemnified Persons for matters within the scope of the indemnification provisions of the Settlement Agreement. See Section 4.1.2: ‘‘Recent Developments.’’
~~3.3.10~~ ~~Exposure to Foreign Exchange Risks~~

Foreign Exchange Risks

Changes in exchange rates influence our results of operations. Our principal operations are located in Thailand, Singapore and China, and a substantial portion of our revenues is denominated in Baht, Singapore dollars or Renminbi. Nearly all of the raw materials for these operations are imported and paid for in U.S. dollars and a substantial portion of our future capital expenditures are expected to be in U.S. dollars. We require a significant amount of U.S. dollars for our ongoing equipment upgrade and maintenance programs. Any devaluation of the Baht, the Singapore dollar or Renminbi against the U.S. dollar would increase the effective cost of foreign manufacturing equipment and the amount of foreign currency denominated expenses and liabilities and would have an adverse impact on our operations. Forward foreign exchange contracts are used on a selective basis to hedge foreign exchange risk, but they do not provide any assurance that we will not incur ~~substant ial~~substantial losses in the event of a devaluation of the Baht, Singapore dollar or Renminbi against the U.S. dollar.

Although our reporting currency is U.S. dollars, the functional currency of our Thai operations, which accounted for 32.6% of our sales in 2009, is the Baht, the functional currency of our Chinese operations (except for PEWS and CCH HK which are in US$ and account for 17.8%), which accounted for 13.6% of our sales in 2009, is the Renminbi, and the functional currency of our Singapore operations, which accounted for ~~9.4%~~26.6% of Company sales (including sales of Distributed ~~Products)~~Products and revenues from SDI project engineering) in ~~2007,~~2009, is the Singapore ~~dollar, the~~dollar. The functional currency for Australian operation is in Australian dollar and account for 9.4% of ~~our Thai operations, which accounted for 48.8% of our~~total Company sales in ~~2007, is the Baht, and the functional currency of our Chinese operations, which accounted for 30.9% of our sales in 2007, is the Renminbi.~~2009. Accordingly, the functional currency accounts of these operations are all translated into U.S. dollars utilizing, for the year, the balance sheet exchange rate for balance sheet accounts, and an average exchange rate for the year for the income statement accounts. Such translation of the functional currency accounts is recognized as a separate component of shareholders’ equity. Any devaluation of the Baht, Singapore dollar or Renminbi against the U.S. dollar would adversely affect our financial performance measured in ~~U .S.~~U.S. dollars.

Substantially all of the revenues of our operations in China are denominated in ~~Renminbi.~~Renminbi (with the exception of PEWS and CCH HK). The value of the Renminbi against the U.S. dollar and other foreign currencies fluctuates and is subject to changes in Chinese and international political and economic conditions. From 1994 to July 20, 2005, the conversion of Renminbi into foreign currencies, including U.S. dollars, was based on rates set by the People’s Bank of China daily based on the previous business day’s inter-bank foreign exchange market rates and current exchange rates on the world financial markets. From 1994 to July 20, 2005, the official exchange rate for the conversion of Renminbi to U.S. dollars was generally stable. On July 21, 2005, the PRC government introduced a managed floating exchange rate system to allow the value of the Renminbi to fluctuate within a regulated band based on market supply and demand and by reference to a basket of currencies. ~~On the same day, the value of the Renminbi appreciated by approximately 2% against the U.S. dollar.~~ The PRC government has since made and in the future may make further adjustments to the exchange rate system. The net effect of these adjustments has been to increase the value of the Renminbi against the U.S. dollar. However, the Chinese government is under continuing pressure from the governments

of its major trading partners to further increase the value of the Renminbi against the U.S. dollar and other global currencies or to allow the global currency markets to determine the comparative value of the Renminbi against freely-traded global currencies. Fluctuations in exchange rates may adversely affect the value, translated or converted into U.S. dollars, of our net assets, earnings and any declared dividends payable by our operating subsidiaries and joint ventures in China. We cannot assure you

that any future movements in the exchange rate of the Renminbi against the U.S. dollar or other foreign currencies will not adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

~~For further information on our foreign exchange risks and certain exchange rates, see Section 11.1: ‘‘Foreign Currency Exposure.’’~~


	~~3.3.11~~	~~Competition~~

Competition

The wire and cable industry in the Asia Pacific region is highly competitive. Our competitors include a large number of independent domestic and foreign suppliers. Certain competitors in each of our markets have substantially greater manufacturing, sales, research and financial resources than we do. We and other wire and cable producers increasingly compete on the basis of product quality and performance, reliability of supply, customer service and price. To the extent that one or more of our competitors is more successful with respect to the primary competitive factors, our business could be adversely affected. ~~See Section 4.2.6: ‘‘Competition’’~~

Risks associated with Required Productivity Increases

Our business strategy includes a focus on increasing profitability through increased efficiency and productivity. In the event we are not able to implement measures to increase efficiencies and productivity, we may be limited in achieving increased profitability or may become less profitable. Moreover, productivity increases are linked to capacity utilization rates. A drop in the utilization rate of our manufacturing capacity would adversely impact productivity.

Indebtedness

As of December 31, 2009, the Company had a total of $279.8 million credit line available to itself, spreading over 22 banks aggregated for ~~additional information regarding~~all the ~~competitive environment~~regions/territories in which we ~~face~~operate. Out of $279.8 million in ~~specific countries.~~


	~~3.3.12~~	~~Composite Services Agreement with PEWC~~

available credit, $211.2 million was unused. The Company, collectively and on individual basis, is not highly leveraged and it is not likely to become highly leveraged just because it has over 75% of the credit facilities unutilized. Weighted average borrowing rate, for all the outstanding loans combined, would sum up to be 2.6%, which runs slightly lower than like-kind borrowing rates in the marketplace, i.e., three month LIBOR of 0.33% plus 2.5%. None of the loan agreements would prohibit the companies from making acquisitions or paying dividends.

Composite Services Agreement with PEWC

We engage in transactions in the ordinary course of business with PEWC, including the purchase of certain raw materials and the distribution of PEWC products in various countries in the Asia Pacific region. We and PEWC have entered into a composite services agreement dated November 7, 1996, as amended and supplemented (the ~~‘‘Composite~~“Composite Services ~~Agreement’’~~Agreement”), which contains provisions that define our relationship and the conduct of our respective businesses and confers certain preferential benefits on us. The Composite Services Agreement is renewable at our option and is currently in force. However, we are unable to predict whether PEWC would, at some future date, seek to limit, or be unable to perform in whole or in part, the business it conducts with the Company pursuant to the terms of the Composite Services Agreement. ~~See Section 10.2: ‘‘Material Contracts’’ for a summary of the terms of the Composite Services Agreement.~~


	~~3.3.13~~	~~Risks Relating to Thailand~~

Risks Relating to Thailand

A substantial portion of our Thai operations, which accounted for approximately ~~48.8%~~32.9% of our net sales in ~~2007,~~2009, consists of the manufacture of telecommunications and power cable and sales of those products for use in large-scale telecommunications projects and various construction projects in Thailand. As a result, our future performance will depend in part on the political situation in Thailand and the general state of the Thai

economy. InRecent political upheaval in Thailand has resulted, and may continue to result, in a reduced volume, or cancellation or suspension, of contracts with the Thai government, a significant customer of the Company. The Company’s Thai operations are increasingly vulnerable to uncertainties with regard to payment for current sales and the award of future contracts in view of the ongoing political crisis in Thailand. Additionally, in recent years the Thai economy has been highly cyclical and volatile, depending for economic growth in substantial part on a number of government initiatives for economic expansion. However, the Baht remains volatile and subject to significant fluctuations in relation to the U.S. dollar. Such fluctuations in the value of the Baht may negatively impact our performance. ~~The Baht traded~~

Environmental Liabilities

We are subject to certain environmental protection laws and regulations governing our operations and the use, handling, disposal and remediation of hazardous substances used by us. A risk of environmental liability could arise from our manufacturing activities in the ~~range~~event of ~~approximately Baht 29.28~~a release or discharge by us of a hazardous substance. Under certain environmental laws, we could be held responsible for the remediation of any hazardous substance contamination at our facilities and at third party waste disposal sites and could also be held liable for any consequences arising out of human exposure to ~~Baht 35.96~~such substances or other environmental damage. There can be no assurance that the costs of complying with environmental, health and safety laws and requirements in our current operations or the liabilities arising from past releases of, or exposure to, ~~US$1~~hazardous substances, will not result in ~~2007.~~


	~~3.3.14~~	~~Alternative Transmission Technologies~~

future expenditures by us that could materially and adversely affect our financial results, cash flows or financial condition.

Alternative Transmission Technologies

Our fiber optic and copper-based telecommunications business is subject to competition from other transmission technologies, principally wireless-based technologies. Fiber optic cable is presently being used in telecommunications trunks and feeder cable businesses and minimally in the access cable business. In the Asia Pacific markets where we compete, wireless telecommunications businesses have sometimes made substantial inroads in early emerging markets where sufficient funding may not then be available to install the infrastructure necessary for market-wide fixed line telecommunications. In addition, the ease of use of wireless telecommunications may make that medium an attractive alternative in circumstances where access to fixed line telecommunications is limited. While these technologies do present significant competition in the markets in which we conduct or plan to conduct business, the Company believes that demand for its fixed wire products will remain strong. However, no assurance can be given that the future development and use of such alternative technologies will not adversely affect our results of operations.

International Business Risks


	~~3.3.15~~	~~Holding Company Structure; Potential Restrictions on the Payment of Dividends~~

We have no direct business operations other than our ownership of the capital stock of our subsidiaries and joint venture holdings. While we have no present intention to pay dividends, should we decide in the future to do so, as a holding company, our ability to pay dividends and meet our other obligations will depend upon the amount of distributions, if any, received from our operating subsidiaries and other holdings and investments. Our operating subsidiaries and other holdings and investments, from time to time, may be subject to restrictions on their ability to make distributions to us, including as a result of restrictive covenants contained in loan agreements, restrictions on the conversion of local currency earnings into U.S. dollars or other hard currency and other regulatory restrictions. For example, PRC legal restrictions permit payments of dividends by our business entities in the PRC only out of their retained earnings, if any, determined in accorda nce with relevant PRC accounting standards and regulations. Under PRC law, such entities are also required to set aside a portion of their net income each year to fund certain reserve funds. These reserves are not distributable as cash dividends. The foregoing restrictions may also affect our ability to fund operations of one subsidiary with dividends and other payments received from another subsidiary. See Section 3.3.3: ‘‘Consolidation of Charoong Thai Group Accounts.’’


	~~3.3.16~~	~~International Business Risks~~

We are subject to risks specific to our international business operations, including: the risk of supply disruption, production disruption or other disruption arising from the outbreak of highly infectious or communicable diseases such as Severe Acute Respiratory ~~Syndrome;~~Syndrome, swine influenza or pandemics of a similar nature; the risk of potential conflict and further instability in the relationship between Taiwan and the PRC; risks related to national and international political instability, such as disruptions to business activities and investment arising out of the political unrest and turmoil currently occurring in Thailand; risks related to the recent global economic turbulence and adverse economic ~~circumstances~~developments in ~~Asia;~~a number of Asian markets; unpredictable consequences on the economic conditions in the U.S. and the rest of the world arising from terrorist attacks, such as the attacks of September 11, 2001 in the U.S. and other military or security operations; unexpected changes in regulatory requirements or legal uncertainties regarding tax regimes; tariffs and other trade barriers, including current and future import and export restrictions; difficulties in staffing and ~~manag ing~~managing international operations in countries such as Singapore, the PRC, Thailand and Taiwan; risks that changes in foreign currency exchange rates will make our products comparatively more expensive; limited ability to enforce agreements and other rights in foreign countries; changes in labor conditions; longer payment cycles and greater difficulty in collecting accounts receivable; burdens and costs of compliance with a variety of foreign laws; limitation on imports or exports and the possible expropriation of private enterprises; and

reversal of the current policies (including favorable tax and lending policies) encouraging foreign investment or foreign trade by our host countries. Although we have not experienced any serious harm in connection with our international operations, we cannot assure you that such problems will not arise in the future.


	~~3.3.17~~	~~Corporate Matters; Limited Recourse; Limited Enforceability~~

We are incorporated in and organized pursuant to the laws of Bermuda. In addition, most of our directors and officers reside outside the United States and a substantial portion of our assets are located outside the United States. As a result, it may be difficult for investors to effect service of process within the United States upon such persons or to realize against them in courts of the United States upon judgments predicated upon civil liabilities under the United States federal securities laws. We have been advised by our legal counsel in Bermuda, Appleby, that there is doubt as to the enforcement in Bermuda, in original actions or in actions for enforcement of judgments of United States courts, of liabilities predicated upon U.S. federal securities laws, although Bermuda Courts will enforce foreign judgments for liquidated amounts in civil matters subject to certain conditions and exceptions.

~~3.4 Forward-looking Statements~~

This Annual Report, including any documents incorporated by reference, contains statements that we believe constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The statements appear throughout this Annual Report and include

statements regarding the intent, belief or current expectations of the Company and its management, including with respect to trends affecting the Company’s financial condition or results of operations and the Company’s plans with respect to capital expenditures and investments. These forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks and uncertainties. Actual results may differ materially from those described in these forward-looking statements as a result of various factors. See Section 3.3: ‘‘Risk Factors’’ for a further discussion of some of the factors that could cause such material differences.

Item 4: Information on the Company

4.1 History and Development of the ~~Company; Recent Developments~~
~~4.1.1~~ ~~History and Development of the Company~~

~~The~~ Company ~~(Asia~~

General

Asia Pacific Wire & Cable Corporation ~~Limited),~~Limited was formed on September 19, 1996 isas a Bermuda exempted limited liability company ~~which, through~~under the Companies Act. The address of the Company’s principal place of business is 7/Fl. B, No. 132, Sec. 3, Min-Sheng East Road, Taipei, 105, Taiwan, Republic of China, and its ~~operating subsidiaries,~~telephone number is (886) 2-2712-2558. Puglisi & Associates, located at 850 Library Avenue, Suite 204, Newark, Delaware 19711, is the Company’s agent for service of process in the United States.

The Company is principally engaged in the manufacture and distribution of telecommunications (copper and fiber optic) and power cable and enameled wire products in the Asia Pacific region, primarily in Thailand, China, Singapore ~~Thailand, Australia~~ and ~~China.~~Australia. The Company manufactures and distributes its own wire and cable products and also distributes ~~copper rod and~~ wire and cable products ~~(‘‘~~(“Distributed ~~Products’’~~Products”) manufactured by its principal shareholder, Pacific Electric Wire & Cable Company, a Taiwanese company ~~(‘‘PEWC’’~~(“PEWC”). ~~Since 1997, the~~The Company ~~has~~ also ~~offered~~provides project engineering services in the supply, delivery and installation ~~(‘‘SDI’’~~(“SDI”) of power ~~cables. PEWC currently owns beneficially 55.4%~~cables to certain of its customers.

Principal Capital Expenditures and Divestitures

Total purchases of property, plant and equipment amounted to $2.7 million in 2007, $3.4 million in 2008 and $3.3 million in 2009. Those purchases related mainly to the ~~issued~~capacity expansion of certain subsidiaries in Thailand and ~~out standing Common Shares~~China, particularly Charoong Thai, and to the replacement of old equipment at various operating facilities.

4.2 Certain Recent Events

As of October 22, 2009, Mr. Frank Tseng was announced by the ~~Company. Sino-JP Fund Co., Ltd. is a privately owned investment company, incorporated under~~Board of Directors to the ~~laws~~position of ~~the Cayman Islands. From September 10, 2004 until September 14, 2005, Sino-JP owned 10,074,102 Common Shares~~Chief Financial Officer of the Company, ~~representing 72.84%~~replacing Mr. Samuel See who had served as interim chief financial officer. Mr. Tseng was previously the Deputy CFO for ABB Taiwan.

Effective as of February 1, 2010, Mr. Ling Y. Wu resigned as the Company’s Non-Resident Company Secretary. Mr. Tseng replaced Mr. Wu effective as of that date.

On September 29, 2009, the Company held its annual general meeting of shareholders. At such meeting, each of the ~~issued and outstanding Common Shares. From September 14, 2005 until June 28, 2007, Sino-JP owned 2,766,154 shares~~directors of the Company ~~representing 20%~~was re-elected and Ernst & Young was appointed as independent auditors of the Company for the 2009 fiscal year.

Until March 27, 2009, SOF Capital, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (“SOF”), owned twenty percent (20%) of the issued and outstanding Common Shares. On ~~June 28, 2007,~~that date, SOF Capital, L.P. acquired from Sino-JP the 20% of the issued and outstanding Common Shares previously held by Sino-JP. See Section 4.1.2: ‘‘Recent Developments’’ and Section 8.1: ‘‘Legal Proceedings.’’ The remaining 24.6% of the issued and outstanding Common Shares are publicly traded on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board (the ‘‘OTC BB’’) in the United States under the trading symbol ‘‘AW RCF.’’

The Company is one of the five largest producers of telecommunications and low voltage power cable and enameled wire in Thailand and believes that it is the largest producer of low voltage power cable in Singapore. In 2007, approximately 56.8% of the manufactured products sold ~~by the Company were sold by its subsidiaries in Singapore and Thailand, with the remainder sold by its subsidiaries or joint ventures in China, Australia and Malaysia.~~

In Singapore, the Company also sells Distributed Products, which largely consist of copper rod and medium and high voltage power cable. In 2007, sales of Distributed Products accounted for 2.1% of the Company’s revenues. As the Company continues to focus its resources on manufacturing and distributing its own products, sales of Distributed Products are expected to decline over time as a percentage of the Company’s business. The Company’s SDI project engineering services accounted for 1.0% of the Company’s revenue in 2007.

The Company sells its cable products primarily to government agencies, telecommunications network operators and large construction companies and subcontractors bidding for government contracts. Telecommunications cable products manufactured by the Company are largely used as access lines to connect buildings and residences to feeder and trunk cables. Power cable manufactured by the Company is used primarily in power transmissions for public lighting, outdoor installations and in and to commercial and residential buildings. Enameled wire is sold primarily to private sector manufacturers of electric motors for use in various consumer appliances. The Company maintains local sales personnel in each country where it has manufacturing operations, and export sales are conducted through independent suppliers as well as the Company’s own sales personnel. The Company principally competes on the basis of product quality and performance, reliability of supply, timely delivery, customer service and price.


	~~4.1.2~~	~~Recent Developments~~

~~Change of Control; Option Exercise by PEWC and Other Material Changes in Ownership~~51% of the Common Shares

~~From September 2004 until September 2005, Sino-JP Fund Co., Ltd., a Cayman Islands company (‘‘Sino-JP’’), held 10,074,102 shares, representing approximately 72.84% of the outstanding Common~~

~~Shares (the ‘‘Supramajority Shares’’). Sino-JP acquired its shares~~ of the Company held by it to PEWC, pursuant to ~~an assignment from Asset Managers Co., Ltd.,~~the exercise of certain sale rights under a ~~Japanese company (‘‘AMC’’). The Supramajority Shares were acquired by AMC pursuant to a Share Purchase Agreement~~shareholders agreement dated as of ~~September 10, 2004~~June 28, 2007 (the ‘‘2004 Share Purchase Agreement’’) by and between AMC and Pacific Electric Wire & Cable Co., Ltd. (‘‘PEWC’’) and certain other parties. The 2004 Share Purchase Agreement and a related Option Agreement dated September 10, 2004 (the ‘‘2004 Option Agreement’’) were entered into in connection with a settlement of certain litigation commenced by PEWC against Set Top International Inc., a British Virgin Islands company (‘‘Set Top’’). In connection with that settlement, Set Top was paid $25,000,000 by AMC in exchange for the ownership interest in and all claims rela ting to the Supramajority Shares. Upon the consummation of the 2004 Share Purchase Agreement, PEWC, which formerly held 75.4% of the outstanding Common Shares, held indirectly approximately 2.56% of the outstanding Common Shares. Under the terms of the 2004 Option Agreement, PEWC was granted an option to reacquire 52.84% of the total issued and outstanding Common Shares (the ‘‘Repurchase Option’’). See Section 8.1: ‘‘Legal Proceedings.’’

In accordance with the provisions of the 2004 Share Purchase Agreement, Sino-JP had caused the Bye-laws of the Company to be amended to establish a classified board of directors, consisting of up to three (3) Class A Directors and up to seven (7) Class B Directors. Sino-JP and its affiliates were entitled to designate candidates for election as the Class A directors, who, under the terms of the revised Bye-laws, had a veto power over all matters presented to the Board of Directors of the Company for a vote.

On September 14, 2005, PEWC exercised the Repurchase Option and reacquired 7,307,948 Common Shares (the ‘‘Repurchased Shares’’), representing 52.84% of the total issued and outstanding Common Shares, for a price of $2.581 per share, or a total purchase price of $18,861,813.78, plus certain guaranteed returns payable by PEWC to Sino-JP. As a result of the reacquisition by PEWC of majority control, PEWC indirectly holds 7,664,615 Common Shares, representing 55.4% of the total issued and outstanding Common Shares and Sino-JP then held 2,766,154 Common Shares, representing 20% of the total issued and outstanding Common Shares (the ‘‘Sino-JP Shares’’).

Commencing in 2004, the banking group creditors of PEWC, consisting of a consortium of 32 banks (the ‘‘PEWC Banking Group’’), represented by Chiao Tung Bank, exercised control over any material expenditures by PEWC. Funding the exercise of the Repurchase Option required the approval of the PEWC Banking Group, which imposed certain conditions on the exercise of the Repurchase Option. Among the conditions, PEWC was required to enter into a letter of undertaking (the ‘‘PEWC Letter of Undertaking’’) which provided that (i) the funds made available would be used only to buy the Repurchased Shares, (ii) as indirect majority shareholder, PEWC would cause the Board of Directors of APWC to consist of a majority of independent directors, with the Banking Group having the right to consent to nominees for any independent directorships, (iii) PEWC would deposit the Repurchased Shares in a trust to secure the obligations of PEWC to the PEWC Banking Group and (iv) PEWC would make monthly installments through September 2006 in repayment of debt owed to the PEWC Banking Group.

~~In order to secure its obligations under the PEWC Letter of Undertaking, PEWC entered into a trust agreement dated September 12, 2005 (the ‘‘PEWC Trust Agreement’’~~“Original Shareholders Agreement”) by and among PEWC, ~~Moon View Ventures Limited BVI, a wholly-owned subsidiary of PEWC (‘‘Moon View’’),~~SOF and ~~Chiao Tung Bank Trust Department Trust Assets (‘‘CTB’’). Under the terms of the PEWC Trust Agreement, the Repurchased Shares were deposited~~the. In connection with ~~and registered with~~such transaction, the Company, ~~registrar in Bermuda in the name of, CTB. In addition to the Repurchased Shares, the trust assets included all dividend~~PEWC and voting rights; provided that PEWC was permitted to direct the voting of the Repurchased Shares unless and until there was a default under the PEWC Letter of Undertaking. In the event of a default by PEWC under the PEWC Letter of Undertaking, which included a default for three consecutive months under the agreements with the PEWC Banking Group, CTB was permitted to dispose of all of the Repurchased Shares and apply the proceeds to pay the PEWC Banking Group or CTB could exercise all voting rights associated with the Repurchased Shares.

~~In May 2006, the PEWC Banking Group determined that PEWC had fulfilled, or was in a position to fulfill, the requirements with respect to the PEWC Letter of Undertaking. Therefore, on~~

June 6, 2006, CTB, on behalf of the PEWC Banking Group, delivered a letter instructing the termination of the PEWC Trust Agreement and authorizing the registration of the Repurchased Shares on behalf of PEWC without any pledge or encumbrance in favor of the PEWC Banking Group.

PEWC has informed the Company that it is a party to a debt restructuring agreement with the PEWC Banking Group which provides PEWC with certain relief from the original loan terms and contains an agreement by the PEWC Banking Group to forbear on exercising certain remedies against collateral so long as PEWC adheres to the terms of the debt restructuring. PEWC has informed the Company that the debt restructuring agreement has been extended through 2009.

Subsequent to the 2004 Share Purchase Agreement, a number of disputes arose between Sino-JP and PEWC regarding the governance of the Company and other matters. Litigation was commenced in Bermuda, in which the Company was named a party, and in Hong Kong, in which the Company was not named a party. On June 28, 2007, the CompanySOF entered into ~~a comprehensive settlement~~an Amended and ~~release agreement with Sino-JP (the ‘‘Settlement Agreement’’),~~Restated Shareholders Agreement, pursuant to which, dismissed and released all claims between the parties and which put an end to all related litigation. PEWC also entered into a settlement and release agreement with Sino-JP that terminated all disputes and litigation between those parties. On the same date, SOF Investments, L.P. (‘‘SOF’’), a Delaware limited partnership, acquired the Sino-JP Shares (the ‘‘SOF Acquisition’’) and entered into a shareholders agreement with the Company and PEWC. Upon t he closing of that acquisition, Messrs. Eric Chi Chiu Yip, Wellen Sham and Ryoji Furukawa, who were all of the director-designees of Sino-JP, resigned from the Board, and all of the officers designated by Sino-JP submitted their resignations, and Sino-JP ceased to have any interest in the Company. On the same date, Messrs. Andy Cheng, Jack Sun and David Sun were re-appointed to the Board.

Following the closing of the SOF Acquisition and the entering into of the Settlement Agreement with Sino-JP, the Board called for an annual general meeting of shareholders which was held on September 7, 2007 (the ‘‘2007 AGM’’). At the 2007 AGM, the shareholders approved, among other things, the ~~reappointment of Ernst & Young LLP~~Company was granted an extension until February 2011 for it to ~~complete~~achieve a listing on a national Securities Market and SOF maintained its ~~audit of~~right to sell its remaining Common Shares to PEWC if the ~~consolidated financial statements~~Company does not achieve that listing.

On March 11, 2009, the SEC declared effective the Company’s shelf registration statement on Form F-1, which registered the Common Shares of the Company ~~for~~held by SOF (which included the ~~year ended December 31, 2004 and~~Common Shares sold by SOF to PEWC in the ~~appointment of Moores Rowland International – Singapore (which now does business under~~March 27, 2009 transaction). The Company is working diligently to render current the ~~name Mazars Moores Rowland LLP) to act as~~financial disclosure contained in the ~~independent auditors~~prospectus that is part of the ~~Company for fiscal years 2005, 2006~~shelf registration statement on Form F-1 covering the Common Shares held by SOF and ~~2007.~~

~~At the 2007 AGM, shareholders of~~certain Common Shares held by PEWC. Actions to be taken by the Company ~~voted to change from a classified to an unclassified Board, composed of eight shareholder-elected directors and two casual vacancies to be filled after the meeting. As of the date of~~in that regard will include the filing of ~~this Annual Report,~~a post-effective amendment containing the Board consists of ten members. The following eight members were elected by shareholders at the 2007 AGM: Michael Lee, Andy C.C. Cheng, David T. Sun, Jack T. Sun, Gai Poo Lee, Ching Rong Shue, Fang-Hsiung Cheng and Yuan Chun Tang.

Certain current Board members have relationships with PEWC. Directors Ching Rong Shue and Gai Poo Lee are Vice Presidents of PEWC, and Fang-Hsiung Cheng is an Assistant Vice President of PEWC. Director Yuan Chun Tang serves as Chairman of APWC, and he serves also as Chairman and a Director of PEWC.

~~At a Board meeting held on September 28, 2007, the Board appointed Mr. Samuel See as interim chief~~Company’s audited financial officer. In addition, the Board filled the two casual vacancies on the Board by appointing Mr. Anson Chan and Dr. Yichin Lee to be independent directors of the Company and to constitute the Audit Committee of the Board, with Mr. Anson Chan to serve as its chairman. In addition, the Board agreed to appoint Mr. Wei Gong as deputy chief operating officer, to be based in Bangkok at the offices of Charoong Thai. Mr. Gong works with the current chief operating officer of APWC, Mr. Carson Tien.

~~On November 9, 2007, the Company filed its annual report on Form 20-F~~statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, ~~2004~~2009.

On October 22, 2009 the Board passed a resolution whereby in connection with the ~~SEC, and on March 17, 2008, the Company filed its combined annual report for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2006 with the SEC.~~

~~On April 9, 2008, trading in the Common Shares~~restructuring plan, Crown Century Holdings Limited (“CCH HK”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, planned to acquire 51% of the shares Asia Pacific Electric Cable, Pty, Ltd., an Australian company owned 13.79% by APWC and 86.21% by Sigma Cable Co. (Pte) Limited (“Sigma Cable”). The plan would call for a transfer of shares from Sigma Cable for a consideration of $9,958,917, in order to offset the loans being extended by CCH HK to Sigma Cable. This transaction was ~~restored to the over-the-counter bulletin board (www.otcbb.com) under the trading symbol ‘‘AWRCF.’’~~completed on March 3, 2010.

4.3 Business Overview

The Company ~~intends to apply for~~is a ~~listing on either the NASDAQ (Global Market) or the American Stock Exchange during the 2008 fiscal year.~~

At a board meeting held on June 13, 2008, the Board approved the formation of a compensation committee and appointed one independent director, Mr. Anson Chan, and three additional directors, Mr. Yuan Chun Tang (acting as Committee Chairman), Mr. David T. Sun, and Mr. Michael C. Lee to the Committee. See Section 6.3: ‘‘Compensation Committee.’’

~~Internal Review~~

In late 2004 and continuing into 2005, the Board of Directors determined to undertake an internal review regarding certain past financial and accounting practices. The Company retained an internationally-recognized forensic accounting firm as outside advisor to assist in the conduct of the internal review.

~~The focus of the investigation included certain internal control weaknesses and other matters, including:~~


	•	~~Lack of documented policies and procedures governing the Company’s accounting policies, internal controls and code of conduct.~~


	•	~~Lack of an adequate internal audit function.~~


	•	~~Need for improvement in monthly financial statement close process for the Company and its subsidiaries to allow timely financial reporting.~~


	•	~~Need for greater U.S. GAAP and tax expertise to identify potential accounting and taxation issues that have a material impact on the Company.~~


	•	~~Lack of credit control policies at various subsidiaries.~~


	•	~~Certain unauthorized payments from the Company and certain of its subsidiaries to several of its former directors and officers.~~

As a result of the internal investigation, certain members of management at two of the Company’s subsidiaries in China, Ningbo Pacific Cable Company Limited (‘‘NPC’’) and Shandong Pacific Fiber Optics Cable Co., Ltd. (‘‘SPFO’’), were terminated. The Board determinedholding company that ~~in a number of instances, management at NPC and SPFO failed to exercise satisfactory supervision over financial and accounting practices, engaged in transactions without an adequate~~operates its business purpose and did not exercise good business judgment. In 2006, the Board determined to cease operations at NPC due to the dim prospects in the near to medium term for reversal of losses and a turn to profitability.

~~Management and the Company’s forensic accounting advisors concluded that there were many instances of inadequate supervisory and internal controls at several of the significant~~through operating subsidiaries and ~~that there existed a widespread failure to establish~~joint ventures, principally located in Thailand, China, Singapore and ~~implement disclosure controls and procedures sufficient to ensure that material information relating to~~Australia.

The following chart shows the organizational structure of the Company ~~is disclosed to senior management by others within the corporate group. Management concluded that the failure to have effective disclosure controls~~ and ~~procedures had a material adverse effect on the financial results of certain~~its principal operating subsidiaries, ~~particularly in the case of NPC located in China where the Company determined to cease operations in part due to the failures and misconduct of local management.~~

The Company is committed to improving the efficacy and reliability of its system of internal controls. We are developing new procedures to enhance internal controls over financial reporting, and we are establishing an internal audit department at the Company headquarters which would establish the rules for internal control procedures and would supervise operating and financial audits. Other measures taken include engaging external consultants to advise on risk control and internal audit functions and to assist in achieving compliance with applicable regulatory requirements, sending staff for training on U.S. GAAP accounting, employing more staff progressively to strengthen the accounting, finance and internal audit departments, implementing credit control policies at certain

~~subsidiaries, and commencing the process of documenting policies and procedures governing the Company’s accounting policies, internal control and code of conduct.~~

While the Company has undertaken the steps summarized above as part of its efforts to establish and maintain satisfactory disclosure controls and procedures, this process has not been completed. The Company cannot now offer any assurances to its shareholders that satisfactory disclosure controls and procedures will be successfully established and maintained.

~~In addition, the Company engaged a consultant to assist the Company’s management,~~ including its Chief Executive Officer (‘‘CEO’’) and Interim Chief Financial Officer (‘‘CFO’’), in evaluating the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007. As a result of that assessment, management, including our CEO and CFO, identified four material weaknesses and certain significant deficiencies in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting as of that assessment date. As a result, under applicable regulatory guidance, the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting as of that assessment date are required to be classified as ineffective. Those weaknesses were reported by our CEO and CFO to the Company’s Board of Directors, its Audit Committee and its independent auditors. In addition, our CEO and CFO reported those significant deficienc ies to the Audit Committeejoint venture ownerships, and the ~~independent auditors. At a meeting held on June 13, 2008, the Company’s Board~~percentage of ~~Directors implemented certain remedial actions which the Company believes, once fully implemented, will address satisfactorily those material weaknesses identified by our CEO~~ownership interest and CFO. However, the Company cannot provide any assurances that those actions will be sufficient or that other material weaknesses will not be identified upon further investigation, such that internal controls over financial reporting may continue to be classified as ineffective, or, if rendered effective for a period of time, may notvoting power in ~~the future cease to be effective.~~

each case. The certifications provided as part of this Annual Report by our Chief Executive Officer and by our Chief Financial Officer are subject to and qualified by the disclosures and discussion in this Annual Report on the lack of adequate disclosure controls and procedures and on the lack of effectiveness, as of December 31, 2007,location of the ~~Company’s internal controls over financial reporting.~~headquarters of each company is indicated in parentheses under the company’s name (“S” for Singapore, “T” for Thailand, “A” for Australia and “C” for China or Hong Kong).

~~4.2 Business Overview~~

Thailand

The Company’s Thai operations are conducted through Charoong Thai Wire and Cable Public Company Limited ~~(‘‘~~(“Charoong ~~Thai’’~~Thai”), Siam Pacific Electric Wire & Cable Company Limited ~~(‘‘~~(“Siam ~~Pacific’’~~Pacific”) and Pacific-Thai Electric Wire & Cable Co. Ltd. ~~(‘‘~~(“Pacific ~~Thai’’~~Thai”).

Although a majority of the board members must be Thai nationals, APWC is the one in control as 4 out of 6 shareholder companies are related or indirectly owned by APWC.

Charoong Thai is a publicly-traded Thai corporation, the shares of which are listed on the Stock Exchange of Thailand ~~(‘‘SET’’~~(“SET”). Immediately after the acquisition of Siam Pacific by Charoong Thai, the shareholders of Charoong Thai consisted of the Company (68.42%), Ital-Thai (16.90%) and Bangkok Insurance (5.31%), with the rest of the shares being publicly-traded on the SET. After the sale of some of its Charoong Thai shares on the open market, the Company held approximately 52.43% of the issued and outstanding shares of Charoong Thai as of December 31, 2005. As of December 31, 2007, the Company owned approximately 50.93% of the issued and outstanding shares of Charoong Thai, with the decrease in the Company’s percentage ownership being attributable to the exercise of warrants or conversion of convertible securities by third parties. The Company’s present intention is to maintain majority ownership of the v oting securities of Charoong Thai. Charoong ThaiIt manufactures aluminum and copper electric wire, medium and high voltage power cable and telecommunications cable. It has subsidiaries and affiliates in the ~~business~~businesses of optic fiber cable manufacturing and ~~the provision of~~ telecommunication and network services.

Charoong Thai was established in Thailand in 1967 as a limited public company. As of December 31, 2009, the Company effectively owned 50.93% of the issued and outstanding shares of Charoong Thai. The Company’s present intention is to maintain majority ownership of the voting securities of Charoong Thai. The board of directors of Charoong Thai may authorize the issuance of additional shares of common stock of Charoong Thai. The Company has preemptive rights to purchase an amount of additional shares equal to its pro rata share of the additional authorized shares, less amounts reserved for directors, officers and employees. In the event the board of Charoong Thai decides to cause it to issue those additional shares, the Company may decide not to exercise its preemptive right, in which case the Company’s interest may be diluted.

Siam Pacific was established in 1988 as a joint venture between PEWC and Ital-Thai, which at the time was the largest diversified construction company in Thailand, principally engaged in the design, engineering, construction and project management of large-scale civil engineering and telecommunications projects in Thailand. Capitalizing on PEWC’s wire and cable manufacturing expertise and Ital-Thai’s significant presence in the local market, Siam Pacific was able to establish its presence in this market and gain knowledge of business opportunities in Thailand. Siam-Pacific is now a 100%-owned subsidiary of Charoong ~~Thai. Siam Pacific manufactures~~Thai and it

focuses on the manufacture of telecommunications cable, power cable and enameled wire for the domestic Thai market.

Pacific Thai was established in 1989 and is a ~~100%-owned~~wholly-owned subsidiary of Siam Pacific. Pacific Thai produces enameled wire for export only and has a special tax status which exempts it from import duties on raw materials used in export manufacturing. This special tax status must be renewed each year.

Based on information published by the Thai Ministry of Commerce on sales by dollar value, the Company believes that Siam Pacific and Charoong Thai are two of leading telecommunications and power cable and wire manufacturers in Thailand and are a few of the government-approved suppliers of telecommunications cable for major public telecommunications projects.

In a restructuring exercise, the Company has merged its Thai operations, which has generated cost savings while improving overall efficiency. The Company believes the synergistic effect of merging these operations will continue to produce significant savings in overhead cost as it facilitates the centralization of decision making and resource allocation for the Thai operations. The management merger of Pacific Thai and Siam Pacific into CTW group would bring synergy and expertise to share among themselves. For example, Siam Pacific’s own concentration on producing enameled wire, together with CTW producing the same product, may bring market integration in the local market and export business overseas. For now, APWC still owns 50.93% of CTW shareholder structure without dilution concern, and SP and PT continue to report their results separately to APWC headquarters.

China

The Company’s China operations are conducted through six business entities. The operating entities include Shanghai Yayang Electric Co., Ltd. (“Shanghai Yayang”), formerly known as Shanghai Pacific Electric Co., Ltd., a joint venture in Shanghai incorporated in June 1998 to manufacture enameled wire. The Company’s effective holding in Shanghai Yayang is 54.41%. Shanghai Yayang is also partly held by Pacific Thai. Shanghai Yayang manufactures enameled wire with a diameter between 0.05mm and 2.5mm for sale and distribution in the eastern part of China, including local and Taiwanese based manufacturers. Sitting in the board are six directors either came from Shanghai Yayang expatriated from Taiwan or Thai representatives, also expatriated from APWC or PEWC.

The Company owns Crown Century Holdings Limited (“CCH HK”), a Hong Kong registered company, and its wholly-owned subsidiary company, Pacific Electric Wire & Cable (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. (“PEWS” or “PEWSC”). PEWS manufactures enameled wire for electronic, video and audio products for export and with little portion sold domestically. CCH HK is the trading arm of PEWS. The contributions of CCH HK/PEWS to the Company’s annual operating results traditionally have been substantial. The Company believes that CCH HK/PEWS is one of the leading manufacturers and distributors of enameled wire products in the south China market.

Shangdong Pacific Fiber Optics Cable Co., Ltd. (“SPFO”) is a joint venture company in Yanggu County, Shandong Province, China. SPFO was established to manufacture fiber optic cables for the China market. The Company owns a 51.0% interest in SPFO, with the remaining interest owned by the joint venture partner, Shandong Yanggu Cable Company (“Shandong Yanggu”), an established cable manufacturer in Shandong Province that produces a wide range of cable products and is considered one of the leading cable producers in China.

The Company holds a 25.0% interest in Shandong Pacific Rubber Cable Company, Ltd. (“SPRC”), which manufactures rubber cable for the China market. The remaining 75% is owned by Shandong Yanggu.

The Company also holds a 49% interest in a joint venture called Shandong Huayu Pacific Fiber Optics Communication Co., Ltd. (“SHP”), which engages in the manufacture of optic fibers. The remaining 51% of SHP is owned by Hebei Huayu Co. Ltd. (as the successor in interest to Shandong Yanggu). Due to a severe

downturn in the market for fiber optic cable after the SHP joint venture was established, the plant intended to be constructed for manufacturing fiber optic cable has yet to be completed and a production date for commencing operations has not been determined. The actual commencement of operations, if it occurs at all, will depend on our ongoing assessment of market conditions. The carrying value of the Company’s investment in SHP was $1.537 million as of December 31, 2009. In the event that the commencement of operations continues to be delayed indefinitely or the joint venture determines to forego planned operations, due to continued depressed conditions in the fiber optic cable market, or other factors are determined to have a direct impact on the assessed value of SHP, the Company will recognize impairment losses in the foreseeable future that could result in the full write-off of its investment in SHP. SHP is currently seeking out potential buyers to take over the business.

Until 2006, the Company’s China operations included Ningbo Pacific Cable Co. Ltd. (“NPC”), a telecommunications cable manufacturing joint venture located in Ningbo Yin County, Zhejiang Province in eastern China, in which the Company owns a 94.31% interest. The other owner of NPC is China Ningbo City Yin County Yinjiang Town Industrial Corporation (“CIC”). NPC used to manufacture a range of telecommunications cable and local area network (“LAN”) electronic cables for sale and distribution in the Chinese domestic market and export market.

Since 1997 the operation was below Company’s expectations due primarily to a lack of market penetration in China. In addition, the performance of certain managers at NPC, who were later terminated, did not comply with the Company’s standards for good business practices. In 2006, the Company determined to cease operations at NPC, as it concluded that the prospects for reversing the losses and achieving profitability were too remote. Thereafter, the Company liquidated certain machinery and equipment through sales to third parties. The land, building and some remaining machinery and equipment are still held by NPC. In December 2009, the Company started a series discussions with a bank in Hong Kong on a possible loan encompassing cash infusion and a trade line facility, all aimed at re-building NPC to be a viable operation focusing on producing electronic wiring, a new product never before manufactured by APWC. But with experience and technology from our parent company, PEWC, the discussion is close to its final stage and the loan arrangement with bank should be closed in the near future.

Singapore

The Company’s Singapore operations are principally conducted through its 98.3%-owned subsidiary, Sigma Cable Company (Private) Limited ~~(‘‘~~(“Sigma ~~Cable’’~~Cable”). Based on information on sales by dollar value provided by the Cable Association in Singapore, the Company believes that Sigma Cable is the largest or second largest supplier of power cable products in Singapore. Sigma Cable manufactures and sells a range of low voltage power cable ~~for sale~~products, used mainly in infrastructure projects and ~~distribution~~commercial and residential developments. Sigma Cable is also the exclusive distributor in Singapore of medium and ~~countries in the Asia Pacific region.~~

~~Sigma Cable also distributes in Singapore a wide range of~~high voltage wire and cable products ~~produced~~manufactured by ~~PEWC and provides SDI~~PEWC.

Sigma Cable also has project engineering ~~services.~~

operations in Singapore to supply, deliver and install (“SDI”) primarily medium and high voltage cable to power transmission projects. While the Company currently obtains its supply of medium and high voltage power cable for its SDI operations from PEWC, other suppliers are also available if necessary. The Company anticipates that there will be increasing demand for medium and high voltage power cable and related turnkey installation projects in Singapore and the Company is seeking to increase its business volume in its project engineering business segment.

The Company also holds a 100% interest in Sigma-Epan International Pte. Ltd. ~~(‘‘Sigma-Epan’’~~(“Sigma-Epan”), a group of companies with limited operations in Singapore and Malaysia. Sigma-Epan group has its headquarters in Singapore. Prior to ceasing manufacturing operations in May of 2007, Sigma-Epan manufactured specialty cables and assembled cable harnesses for the electronics, computer, building automation, audio and communication industries. Sigma-Epan continues to trade specialty electronic and other types of cables.

Australia

The Company holds a 98.53% effective interest in Australia Pacific Electric Cables Pty Limited ~~(‘‘APEC’’~~(“APEC”), a subsidiary of Sigma Cable, located near Brisbane, ~~Australia.~~Australia as of December 31, 2009. APEC is one of three major wire and cable manufacturers in Australia. The company produces a range of power cables, ~~which is~~ supplemented by imports from overseas sister companies. APEC possesses a substantial marketing and distribution infrastructure with a network of sales offices and warehouses in the major capital cities of Brisbane, Sydney, Melbourne and Perth.

~~During fiscal year 2007,~~ On October 22, 2009 the Company’s China operations were conducted through six business entities. The operating entities included Shanghai Yayang Electric Co., Ltd. (‘‘Shanghai Yayang’’), formerly known as Shanghai Pacific Electric Co., Ltd.,Board passed a ~~joint venture~~resolution whereby in Shanghai incorporated in June 1998 to manufacture enameled wire. The Company’s effective holding in Shanghai Yayang is 54.41%. Shanghai Yayang is also partly held by Pacific Thai. Shanghai Yayang manufactures enameled wireconnection with ~~a diameter of between 0.05mm and 2.5mm.~~

Shangdong Pacific Fiber Optics Cable Co., Ltd. (‘‘SPFO’’) is a joint venture company in Yanggu County, Shandong Province, China. SPFO was established to manufacture fiber optic cables for the China market. The Company owns a 51.0% interest in SPFO, with the remaining interest owned by the joint venture partner, Shandong Yanggu Cable Company (‘‘Shandong Yanggu’’), an established cable manufacturer in Shandong Province that produces a wide range of cable products and is considered one of the leading cable producers in China.

On June 30, 2001, the Company invested approximately $1.2 million for a 25.0% interest in an existing profitable company, Shandong Pacific Rubber Cable Company, Ltd. (‘‘SPRC’’), which manufactures rubber cable for the China market. The remaining 75% is owned by Shandong Yanggu. The investment was in the form of a contribution of machinery and cash.

On August 18, 2001, a joint-venture agreement was signed with Shandong Yanggu to establish Shandong Huayu Pacific Fiber Optics Communication Co., Ltd. (‘‘SHP’’) for the manufacture of optic fibers. The Company owns 49% of SHP with the remaining 51% owned by Hebei Huayu Co. Ltd. (as the successor in interest to Shandong Yanggu). Due to the subsequent deterioration of the fiber optic market price, the plant has yet to be completed and a production date for commencing operations has not been determined. The actual commencement of operations, if it occurs at all, will depend on our ongoing assessment of market conditions. In 2007, the Company took a $0.1 million impairment loss on the SHP investment to reflect that assessment and sold all major equipment owned by SHP.

~~On March 22, 2002, the Company acquired two companies, namely,~~restructuring plan, Crown Century Holdings Limited ~~(‘‘CCH’’~~(“CCH HK”), CCH HK planned to acquire 51% of APEC shares from Sigma Cable Co. (Pte) Limited (“Sigma Cable”) ~~and its wholly-owned~~for a consideration of USD9,958,917, in order to offset the loans being extended by CCH HK to Sigma Cable. This transaction was completed on March 3, 2010.

Malaysia

Elecain Industry Sdn Bhd (“Elecain”), an operating subsidiary ~~company, Pacific Electric Wire & Cable (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. (‘‘PEWS’’) from PEWC, the majority shareholder of the Company. The acquisition was in exchange for 3,097,436 new shares~~ of the Company ~~issued~~located in Malaysia, ceased operations in 2007. The board’s intention was to ~~PEWC. PEWS manufactures enameled wire for electronic, video and audio products for~~liquidate the ~~South China market and for export. CCH is~~company but due to some irreconcilable accounting reasons on inter-company balance the ~~trading arm of PEWS. The operations of PEWS and CCH have been profitable since 1999 and have contributed~~company still exists. Elecain was not significant to the ~~profits~~business of the Company.

4.3.1 Products and Services

The Company engages in ~~2007.~~

~~Until 2006,~~three principal business lines consisting of the ~~Company’s China operations included Ningbo Pacific Cable Co. Ltd. (‘‘NPC’’), a telecommunications~~manufacture of wire and cable ~~manufacturing joint venture located in Ningbo Yin County, Zhejiang Province in eastern China, in which~~products, the ~~Company owned a 94.31% interest. The other owner~~distribution of ~~NPC was China Ningbo City Yin County Yinjiang Town Industrial Corporation (‘‘CIC’’). NPC~~its own manufactured ~~a range of telecommunications cable and local area network (‘‘LAN’’) electronic cables for sale and distribution in the Chinese domestic market and export market.~~

~~NPC’s performance since 1997 was below the Company’s expectations due primarily to difficulties faced in marketing its~~ products and ~~market penetration in China. In addition, the performance~~ of certain ~~managers at NPC, who were later terminated, did not comply with~~wire and cable products manufactured by PEWC, and the ~~Company’s standards for business practices. See Section 4.1.2: ‘‘Recent Developments, Internal Review.’’ The Company’s 2002 results included a write-off~~provision of ~~approximately $1.5 million in the carrying value~~project engineering services to certain of the telecommunication cable machinery at NPC. In 2006, the Company determined to cease operations at NPC, as it concluded that the prospects for reversing the losses and achieving profitability were too remote. Thereafter, the Company liquidated its ~~assets at the NPC facility.~~


	~~4.2.1~~	~~Products and Services~~

customers. The Company manufactures and sells a wide variety of wire and cable products primarily in four general categories: telecommunications cable, power transmission cable, enameled wire and, until May 2007, electronic cables, which the Company ceased to manufacture as of that date. The Company’s telecommunications and power cables are used in a range of infrastructure projects and in commercial and residential developments. The Company’s enameled wire is used in the manufacturing of components and sub-components of household appliances and small machinery. The electronic cables, which include cable harnesses, are used in the electronics, computer, building automation, audio and communication industries. In addition, the Company acts as the Singapore distributor of ~~copper rod and~~ wire and cable products manufactured by PEWC. The Company also offers SDI project engineering services of medium and high voltage cable for power transmission projects in ~~Sin gapore.~~Singapore.

Distribution

Sales of Distributed Products

The Company has a sales and marketing force for the distribution of its manufactured products in the markets where it has manufacturing facilities and in certain other Asian markets. In addition, the Company is a distributor of wire and cable products manufactured by PEWC. The leading PEWC products sold by the Company are medium and high voltage power cable (with capacities ranging from 3.3 kilovolts to 69 kilovolts), with the vast majority of such sales made in Singapore. The PEWC products sold by the Company do not compete with the Company’s manufactured products.

Services

SDI Project Engineering Services

voltage power and for value added services in the power supply industry. To take advantage of these opportunities, the Company has developed its SDI project engineering capability. The SDI project engineering operations supply, deliver and install primarily medium and high voltage cable to power transmission projects in Singapore. After entering into a contract to supply, deliver and install cable for a power transmission project, the Company delivers medium and high voltage cables and enters into subcontracting agreements with local companies to install the cable as required by the project. Because of these changes, the company in Singapore was able to be awarded two significant contracts.

4.3.2 Manufacturing

Copper rod is the base component for most of the Company’s products. The manufacturing processes for these products require that the rod be “drawn” and insulated. In the “drawing” process, copper rod is drawn through a series of dies to reduce the copper to a specific diameter. For certain applications, the drawn copper conductor is then plated with tin. Copper used in cable is covered with various insulating materials that are applied in an extrusion process. The insulated wires are then combined, or “cabled” to produce the desired electrical properties and transmission capabilities. Then, depending upon the cable, some form of protective cover is placed over the cabled wires. A summary of the manufacturing process used for the Company’s primary wire and cable products is set forth below.

Telecommunications Cable

The Company produces a wide range of bundled telecommunications cable for telephone and data transmissions with different capacities and insulations designed for use in various internal and external environments principally as access cable to connect buildings and residents to trunk cables. Telecommunications cables produced by the Company include copper-based and fiber optic cables.

~~Copper-based cables contain twisted pairs~~

Production of ~~insulated~~copper-based telecommunications cable begins by drawing a copper rod until it has reached the desired diameter, after which the drawn wires are subjected to a process called “annealing” in which the wires are heated in order to make the wires softer and more pliable. Utilizing an extrusion process, which involves the feeding, melting and pumping of a compound through a die to shape it in final form as it is applied to insulate the wire, ~~each pair color-coded and corresponding to one telecommunications line. The cables~~the wires are ~~produced with different insulators such as~~then covered by a polyethylene ~~(‘‘PE’’~~(“PE”), or polyvinyl chloride ~~(‘‘PVC’’~~(“PVC”) compound and foam skin, suitable for different installations and environmental conditions. In order to reduce the cross-talk between pairs of communication wires, the insulated wires are then “twinned” or twisted so that two insulated single wires are combined to create a color-coded twisted pair. The twisted pairs of wire are then “cabled” or “stranded” into units of 25 twisted pairs for combination with other 25 pair units to form cable of various widths and capacities. The appropriate number of units are cabled together after stranding to form a round cable core. Depending upon the planned environment, a petroleum jelly compound may then be added to fill the cable core to seal out moisture and water vapor. Aluminum or copper tape is used to “shield” the cable and, finally, the shielded cable core is covered by plastic outer sheathing. The Company manufactures telecommunications cable with capacities and sizes ranging from 25 to 3,000 pairs of 0.4 mm-diameter wire to 10 to 600 pairs of 0.9 mm-diameter wire.

Power Cable

The Company produces a range of armored and unarmored low voltage power transmission cable. Low voltage power cable, generally considered to be cable with a capacity of 1 to 3.3 kilovolts, is typically used to transmit electricity to and within commercial and residential buildings, as well as to outdoor installations such as street lights, traffic signals and other signs. Armored low-voltage power cable is usually used for public lighting and power transmission running to buildings and installed either above or below ground. Unarmored low voltage cable is mainly used as lighting and power supply cable inside and outside of buildings. The voltage capacity of the Company’s power cables range from 300 volts to one kilovolt.

Unarmored cable is composed of one or more cores of copper wire, insulated by substances such as PVC. Armored cable is produced in the same range of configurations as unarmored cable, but with the addition of an outer layer of galvanized steel or iron wires to protect the cable from damage.

~~Enameled Wire~~

The Company also produces several varieties of enameled wire. Enameled wire is copper wire varnished, in an enameling process, by insulating materials. The enameling process makes the wire more resistant to oil, heat, friction and fusion, and therefore suitable for use in machinery and components and sub-components of manufactured goods. The Company manufactures enameled wire

in sizes that range from 0.02 mm to 4.00 mm in diameter, varnished by various types of petroleum insulation materials including polyvinal formal, polyurethanea wire and polyester, among others. Enameled wire products are used in the assembly of a wide range of electrical products, including oil-filled transformers, refrigerator motors, telephones, radios, televisions, fan motors, air conditioner compressors and other electric appliances.

~~Electronic Cables~~

Until May 2007, the Company also produced a wide range of electronic cables and related byproducts, including high specification telecommunication cables, data-communication cables, security cables, cable assemblies, fiber optic cables, local area network (‘‘LAN’’) patch-cords products and harness assembly. The products were used in the electronics, building automation, telecommunications and data-communications industries. The customers included government bodies, large construction companies, subcontractors bidding for government contracts and system integrators. These cables were produced by the Sigma-Epan group, which ceased manufacturing operations in May 2007. Since Sigma-Epan ceased manufacturing operations, the Company no longer manufactures electronic cables but continues to trade specialty electronic and other types of cables.

~~Sales of Distributed Products~~

The Company is also a distributor of copper rod and wire and cable products manufactured by PEWC. The leading PEWC products sold by the Company are medium and high voltage power cable (with capacities ranging from 3.3 kilovolts to 69 kilovolts) and copper rod, with the vast majority of such sales made in Singapore. The PEWC products sold by the Company do not compete with the Company’s manufactured products.

~~SDI Project Engineering Services~~

Based on trends of government and private sector expansion and upgrading of residential and commercial buildings and infrastructure projects in Singapore, the Company anticipates demand for medium and high voltage power and for value added services in the power supply industry. To take advantage of these opportunities, the Company has developed its SDI project engineering capability. The SDI project engineering operations supply, deliver and install primarily medium and high voltage cable to power transmission projects in Singapore. After entering into a contract to supply, deliver and install cable for a power transmission project, the Company delivers medium and high voltage cables and enters into subcontracting agreements with local companies to install the cable as required by the project.


	~~4.2.2~~	~~Manufacturing~~

Copper rod is the base component for most of the Company’s products. The manufacturing processes for these products require that the rod be ‘‘drawn’’ and insulated. In the ‘‘drawing’’ process, copper rod is drawn through a series of dies to reduce the copper to a specific diameter. For certain applications, the drawn copper conductor is then plated with tin. Copper used in cable is covered with various insulating materials that are applied in an extrusion process. The insulated wires are then combined, or ‘‘cabled’’ to produce the desired electrical properties and transmission capabilities. Then, depending upon the cable, some form of protective cover is placed over the cabled wires.

~~A summary of the manufacturing process used for the Company’s primary wire and cable products is set forth below.~~

~~Telecommunications Cable~~

Production of telecommunications cable begins by drawing a copper rod until it has reached the desired diameter, after which the drawn wires are subjected to a process called ‘‘annealing’’ in which the wires are heated in order to make the wires softer and more pliable. Utilizing an extrusion process, which involves the feeding, melting and pumping of a compound through a die to shape it in

final form as it is applied to insulate the wire, the wires are then covered by a PE or PVC compound in one of ten standard colors. In order to reduce the cross-talk between pairs of communication wires, the insulated wires are then ‘‘twinned’’ or twisted so that two insulated single wires are combined to create a color-coded twisted pair. The twisted pairs of wire are then ‘‘cabled’’ or ‘‘stranded’’ into units of 25 twisted pairs for combination with other 25 pair units to form cable of various widths and capacities. The appropriate number of units are cabled together after stranding to form a round cable core. Depending upon the planned environment, a petroleum jelly compound may then be added to fill the cable core to seal out moisture and water vapor. Aluminum or copper tape is used to ‘‘shield’’ the cable and, finally, the shielded cable core is covered by plastic outer sheathing.

~~Power Cable~~

~~Unarmored cable.~~ Production of unarmored cable begins by drawing and annealing of copper rods. The drawn copper wires are then stranded or ~~‘‘bunched’’~~“bunched” into round or sector-shaped conductors in sizes ranging from 1.5 square millimeter to 1000 square millimeters. The copper conductors are then covered in an extrusion process with a plastic insulator such as a PVC, after which 2-5 conductors are twisted into a circular cable core in a cabling process and covered by a plastic outer cover.

~~Armored cable.~~

The Company has historically purchased a substantial portion of its copper rods from PEWC. Under the Composite Services Agreement between the Company and PEWC, PEWC agreed to supply to the Company on a priority basis its copper rod requirements at prices at least as favorable

as prices charged to other purchasers in the same markets purchasing similar quantities. PEWC continues to be the principal supplier of copper rods to the Company’s operations. Under the Company’s copper rod supply arrangements, orders will be placed between eight to ten weeks before the desired delivery date, with prices ~~‘‘pegged’’~~“pegged” to the average spot price of copper on the LME for the one month prior to delivery plus a premium.

The Company purchases copper cathodes, which are subject to a 1.0% import tariff, for use at its Thailand operations in order to avoid the higher import tariff of 5.0% on copper rods. The Company obtains copper cathodes from three major suppliers which import cathodes into the Thai market. These suppliers are Mitsubishi Corporation, Mitsui & Co (Thailand) and Marubeni Corporation. The Company has regularly signed one-year contracts with each of its copper cathode suppliers pursuant to which the Company agrees to purchase a set quantity of copper cathodes each month. Under the terms of such contracts, the price of copper cathodes is usually ~~‘‘pegged’’~~“pegged” to the average of the spot price of copper on the LME for the delivery month plus a premium. The Company believes its relationships with its three copper cathode suppliers will allow access to alternative supplies in the event one or more of such suppliers was unable or unwilling to renew a supply contract on terms satisfactory to the Company, although the Company does not anticipate any change in relations in the near term.

The Company attempts to maintain approximately a three to five week supply of copper rods and cathodes for its Thai operations and approximately a two to four week supply in Singapore. In PEWS, the Company was able to maintain one to two weeks of supply of copper rods and cathodes. The Company has never experienced a material supply interruption or difficulty obtaining sufficient supply of copper rod or cathode.

Other raw materials used by the Company include aluminum used as a conductor in power cable and petroleum-based insulation materials such as PE, PVC and jelly compounds for insulating covers on cables and varnishes on enameled wire; aluminum foils for sheathing of communication cable; and galvanized steel wire for the production of armored wire. The Company has not had any difficulty in maintaining adequate supplies of these raw materials and expects to continue to be able to purchase such raw materials at prevailing market prices.

Other than import tariffs in Thailand, the Company does not face any restriction or control on the purchase or import of its raw materials. The Company may freely choose its suppliers and negotiate the price and quantity of material with its suppliers. The Company formulates consumption plans for raw materials regularly and continually monitors market conditions in respect of the supply, price and quality of raw materials.


	~~4.2.4~~	~~Quality Control~~

Inflation would increase the cost of raw materials and operating expenses for the Company. The Company would try to maintain its gross margins by increasing the prices of its products.

4.3.4 Quality Control

The Company places a significant emphasis on product quality. The Company has implemented a range of quality control procedures with stringent quality standards under the supervision of a dedicated quality control staff. Quality control procedures are implemented from the raw material to the finished product stages at each of the Company’s major production facilities. Raw materials are inspected to ensure they meet the necessary level of quality before production begins. During the manufacturing process, quality control procedures are performed at several stages of production. Upon completion, finished goods are brought to quality control centers set up in the factory for inspection and testing of different electrical and physical properties.

Depending on the requirements of its customers, the Company has the capability to manufacture its products to meet a variety of different quality and production standards. These include local standards and certifications, such as the Singapore Institute of Standards and Industrial Research Quality Mark and the Thailand Industrial Standard, as well as other standards including the National

Electrical Manufacturers Association Standard, the British Standard, the Japan Industrial Standard and Underwriters Laboratories Inc. Standard, as applicable.

All the major companies in the group have attained International Standards Organization ~~(‘‘ISO’’~~(“ISO”) 9002 certification for quality management and assurance standards in the manufacture of electric wire and cable and have maintained that certification for at least the last ten years. The certifications mean that the companies have in place quality assurance systems and the capability to consistently manufacture products of quality.


	~~4.2.5~~	~~Sales and Marketing~~

4.3.5 Sales and Marketing

The Company’s telecommunications cable and power cable products are primarily sold in the domestic markets of the countries where they are manufactured, whereas most of the enameled wire manufactured by the Company is exported to take advantage of Pacific Thai’s tax status exempting it from paying import duties on raw materials used in the manufacture of export product. The following table sets forth the Company’s sales revenues ~~by geographic area~~ for the periods indicated among its three segments and, within the manufactured products segment, by geographic market, together with their respective percentage share of total sales revenue for such periods:


					Year ended December 31,
	(dollar figures ($) are in thousands of US$)
	2007				2008				2009
	$		%		$		%		$		%
Manufactured Products:
Thailand		249,337		48.9		149,544		43.1		117,954		32.6
Singapore		31,762		6.2		35,318		7.1		34,583		9.5
Australia		55,789		10.9		61,167		12.2		33,935		9.4
China		157,917		30.9		134,999		27.0		113,649		31.4

Total		494,805		96.8		447,848		89.4		300,121		82.9

Distributed Products⁽¹⁾		10,783		2.1		32,415		6.5		28,102		7.7
SDI Project Engineering⁽²⁾		5,253		1.0		20,535		4.1		34,008		9.4

Total net sales		510,841		100.0		500,798		100.0		362,231		100.0

Year ended December 31,
(dollar figures ($) are in thousands of US$)
2005 2006 2007
$ % $ % $ %
Manufactured Products:
Thailand 100,683 29.9 % 142,500 30.4 % 170,585 33.4 %
Singapore 14,968 4.4 % 29,440 6.3 % 31,762 6.3 %
Australia 34,831 10.3 % 49,134 10.5 % 55,789 10.9 %
China 102,797 30.5 % 148,502 31.7 % 157,917 30.9 %
Export 48,237 14.3 % 69,704 14.9 % 78,752 15.4 %
Total 301,516 89.4 % 439,280 93.8 % 494,805 96.9 %
Distributed Products⁽¹⁾ 20,055 5.9 % 12,416 2.7 % 10,783 2.1 %
SDI Project Engineering⁽²⁾ 15,691 4.7 % 16,421 3.5 % 5,253 1.0 %
Total net sales 337,262 100.0 % 468,117 100.0 % 510,841 100.0 %


⁽¹⁾

⁽¹⁾	Distributed Products are ~~largely~~ sold primarily in Singapore.


⁽²⁾	~~All~~	At present, all SDI Project Engineering is supplied in Singapore.

Sales within Thailand and Singapore are made directly by the sales department of the Company’s local subsidiaries in accordance with terms and pricing set by the local subsidiaries. The local subsidiaries are also responsible for sales planning, marketing strategy and customer liaison. The Company’s sales staff is knowledgeable about the Company’s products and frequently must render technical assistance, consulting services and repair and maintenance services to the Company’s customers. In order to ensure quality service and maintain sensitivity to market conditions, the Company does not conduct sales through independent sales agents on a commission basis but uses its own sales employees located at the operating subsidiaries.

As copper constitutes the costliest component of the Company’s wire and cable products, the price of the Company’s products depends primarily upon the price of copper. In order to minimize the ~~risk~~impact of copper

price fluctuations, the Company attempts to determine the prices of its products based on the prevailing market price of copper. However, the Company may be affected, to a degree, in the short term by significant fluctuations in the price of copper.

Payment methods for the Company’s products vary with markets and customers. The majority of sales by the Company of its manufactured products require payment within 90 days, but may vary depending on the customer and payment record. Sales pursuant to a successful project tender or sales to governmental or public utilities are conducted in accordance with the tender or other applicable

regulations. In connection with the distribution of medium and high voltage power cable manufactured by PEWC, the Company is required to pay PEWC 90% of the cost of the products either within 30 days of receipt of the product or, in the case of SDI products, upon installation, with the remaining 10% to be paid within one year. In connection with the purchase of copper rod, the Company is required to pay PEWC the cost of the copper rod within 30 days from obtaining the products from PEWC. For the export market, payment is usually made by prior delivery of an irrevocable letter of credit. Neither the Company nor its local subsidiaries offer financing for purchases of the Company’s products. The Company sells its products in the local currency of the country of sale. Company employees engaged in sales and marketing are paid a salary and may also receive a bonus based on performance.

Products are marketed under the respective names of each company. For instance, products manufactured by Siam Pacific are marketed under the ~~‘‘Siam Pacific’’~~“Siam Pacific” and ~~‘‘PTEWC’’~~“PTEWC” brands, both registered trademarks in Thailand; products manufactured by Sigma Cable are sold under the ~~‘‘Sigma Cable’’~~“Sigma Cable” brand.

Thailand

The Company produces and sells telecommunications cable, enameled wire and power cable in Thailand. Sales of telecommunications cables, the Company’s leading product in Thailand, are conducted either by tender for participation in large scale telecommunications projects of the TOT Corporation Ple. ~~(‘‘TOT’’~~(“TOT”), or directly to subcontractors of TT&T and True Corporation Ple., the two private telephone line contractors which would be licensed by TOT with regard to particular projects. Power cable (and a limited quantity of telecommunications cable) is generally sold to construction firms or contractors for use in infrastructure, commercial and residential construction projects. The Company generally sells enameled wire directly to manufacturers of electric motors for use in various consumer appliances. Enameled wire purchasers tend to be smaller businesses than those that purchase telecommunications and power cable. A small quantity of power and telecommunications cable and enameled wire is sold to general electrical products supply companies which then resell to end users.

Singapore

The Company produces and sells low voltage power cable in Singapore. In addition, the Company sells a wide range of wire and cable products produced by PEWC. Power cables manufactured by the Company and PEWC are primarily sold to SP Powerassets, a quasi-public entity responsible for power delivery in Singapore, and to a large number of private contractors and construction firms. The Company also offers project engineering services for the SDI of medium and high voltage power cable to power transmission projects in Singapore.

~~Sales~~

In Singapore alone, sales of ~~Company~~ manufactured products in ~~2007~~2009 accounted for ~~66.4%~~36.5% of the ~~Company’s~~ net sales in Singapore; sales of Distributed Products in ~~2007~~2009 accounted for ~~22.6%~~28.9% with the remaining ~~11.0%~~34.6% comprised of SDI project engineering services. In ~~2007,~~2009, sales to SP Powerassets alone accounted for approximately ~~39.5%~~71.42% of the Company’s total sales in Singapore and ~~3.7%~~18.1% of the Company’s total aggregate sales. ~~Additionally,~~While the Company is seeking to increase the volume of business in its SDI business segment, in 2009 sales of SDI project engineering services to SP Powerassets ~~in 2007~~ accounted for ~~96.4%~~100% of the Company’s SDI sales. Approximately ~~35.5%~~34.5% of the sales to SP Powerassets in ~~2007~~2009 were sales of Distributed Products, which sales have a low profit margin. Such sales are not made under a continuing contract, but pursuant to purchase orders

placed from time to time with the Company by SP Powerassets. Sales of copper wire and cable products purchased from PEWC since 2007 are as follows (in thousands):


	Year ended December 31,
	(figures are in thousands of US$)
	2007		2008		2009
Manufactured Product:
Power Cable		7,109		6,435		11,519
Electronic Wire		3,493		194		692

Total		10,602		6,629		12,211

Although SP Powerassets is an important customer of the Company, neither the loss of Distributed Product sales to SP Powerassets, nor the ~~los s~~loss of manufactured product sales to SP Powerassets, which the Company expects would be replaced by sales to other customers, would likely have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations. Although the Company does not believe that it could easily replace its SDI sales to SP Powerassets by sales to other customers, ~~SDI sales accounted for only 1.0% of~~ the ~~Company’s sales in 2007.~~

Company believes its customer relationship with SP Powerassets is satisfactory and is viewed by both parties as a long-term relationship.

China

The Company produces and sells copper-based telecommunication cable, fiber optic cables and enameled wire in China. The Company’s China operations are conducted through six business entities.

Copper-based telecommunication cables and fiber optic cables are generally sold to the national, provincial or local offices of the fixed-line and mobile telecommunications network operators or sub-contactors of such agencies. The Company generally sells enameled wire directly to manufacturers of electric motors for use in various consumer appliances.

Exports

The Company’s main export markets are Hong Kong, Vietnam, India, China, Malaysia and Indonesia. Export sales are conducted by local agents or distributors of the Company in accordance with terms and prices negotiated between the local agent and the Company at the time of sale. In Thailand, the Company’s principal export is enameled wire. In Singapore, the Company’s principal export is power cable. The Company does not actively pursue an export business in Singapore, but benefits from Singapore’s position as a trading center and makes export sales in response to buyer inquiries and solicitations. Total export sales accounted for ~~15.4%~~9.1% of aggregated net sales in ~~2007.~~


	~~4.2.6~~	~~Competition~~

2009

4.3.6 Competition

The wire and cable industry in the Asia Pacific region is highly competitive. The Company’s competitors include a large number of independent domestic and foreign suppliers. Certain competitors in each of the Company’s markets have substantially greater manufacturing, sales, research and financial resources than the Company. The Company and other wire and cable producers increasingly compete on the basis of product quality and performance, reliability of supply, customer service and price. To the extent that one or more of the Company’s competitors is more successful with respect to the primary competitive factors, the Company’s business could be adversely affected.

Thailand

The wire and cable industry in Thailand is highly competitive. In its various product lines, the Company competes with a total of approximately 30thirty local wire and cable manufacturers and, to a lesser extent, with foreign producers for sales in Thailand of telecommunications cable, power cable and enameled wire. Based on information published by the Thai Ministry of Commerce on sales by dollar value, the Company believes

that Siam Pacific and Charoong Thai are two of the five largest wire and cable producers in Thailand and their principal competitors are the three other largest producers in Thailand. These five largest producers are the only producers of telecommunications cable approved by the Thai Industrial Standards Institute and, therefore, the only cable producers whose products may be used in government-commissioned projects. Stringent governmental approval processes, tariffs and other import restrictions have limited competition in the Thailand market from foreign wire and cable producers. The Company also experiences significant competition from a number of smaller ~~pr oducers~~producers with regard to sales of enameled wire products.

Singapore

~~The~~

Based on information provided by the Cable Association in Singapore, the Company principally competes with four other major wire and cable manufacturers in Singapore. Although the Company believes it is the largest ~~manufacturer~~or second largest supplier of ~~low voltage~~ power cable in Singapore based on information on sales by dollar value provided by the Cable Association in Singapore, it experiences significant competition from other local producers.

There ~~are~~is no tariff or other barriers against foreign competition in the local Singapore market and potential competitors are free to enter the industry. However, because of high capital costs, the Company believes it is unlikely that there will be new domestic entrants to the wire and cable industry in Singapore in the near future.

Australia

Currently, besides APEC, there are two major wire and cable producers in Australia: Olex Cables (owned by ~~Pacific Dunlop)~~Nexans) and ~~Pirelli~~Prysmian Cables, with factories in the states of Victoria and New South Wales, respectively. ~~Both~~Also, Advance Cable, a cable producer with a factory in Victoria, has recently obtained a bigger market share. In addition, a significant portion of the Australian market is serviced by two importers: (i) General Cables Australia, which imports cables from its parent company General Cables, which manufactures cables in New Zealand and (ii) Electra Cables, which imports cables from factories in China. These companies are APEC’s principal competitors. ~~In addition, General Cables is a major participant in the market.~~ During fiscal year ~~2007,~~2009, APEC was the only power cable producer in Queensland and therefore sought to take advantage of its comparative proximity to customers in contrast to competitors that were required to transport their products into Queensland from other ~~competitors importing into Queensland.~~

states in Australia. APEC has also opened sales offices with warehousing facilities in Sydney, Melbourne and Perth in order to attract and service the customers in those regions. Foreign competition barriers exist with import duties and the more stringent Australian cable specifications standards. Free Trade Agreements are in effect with Singapore and Thailand.

China

PEWS manufactures enameled wire in the Shenzhen Special Economic Zone in Guangdong Province for electronic, video and audio products for the South China market and for export. CCH HK is the trading arm of PEWS. Based on information provided by customers and suppliers, the Company believes that, based on production capacity, PEWS is one of the largest enameled wire manufacturers amongst the six manufacturers in Shenzhen. It supplies mainly to transformer, motor and coil manufacturers in and around Shenzhen. It faces competition principally from overseas imports and local manufacturers.

Shanghai Yayang is the only major enameled wire producer in Shanghai and it supplies mainly to transformer, motor and coil manufacturers in Shanghai. It faces competition principally from overseas imports and manufacturers from other provinces.

According to the Optical Cables Trade Association, SPFO is one of the largest manufacturers of fiber optic cables in Shandong Province ~~and it~~based on sales by dollar value. It supplies mainly to government controlled and licensed telecommunications network operators such as China Netcom, China Telecom, China Mobile, China Railcom, China Unicom and China Powercom. It faces competition principally from a number of the larger domestic fiber optic cable ~~manufacturers in China.~~manufacturers.

4.3.7 Regional Considerations

Prior to the onset of ~~its manufactured products in 2007. These products are principally sold through independent suppliers in competition with domestic and foreign manufacturers.~~


	~~4.2.7~~	~~Regional Considerations~~

~~The~~the 2008 recession, the principal Asian markets in which we do business ~~have shown~~displayed exceptional overall economic growth in recent years compared to the United States and a number of other more developed markets, subject to occasional episodes of economic and currency exchange volatility attributable to various factors including the increased risks of emerging market investment, actual or potential political instability and pandemics such as the SARS health crisis several years ago. In some countries, the IMF exerts considerable influence over economic policy and provides support to stabilize the domestic economy. In general, the Asian markets in which we do business have been export-driven in recent years and have in the case of China and Singapore, for example, accumulated considerable capital reserves, which contributes to a more stable business environment.

Thailand

According to the November 2009 East Asia and Pacific Update published by the World Bank, the ~~projected economic~~GDP growth ~~rate~~projection in Thailand for ~~2007 was 4.3% compared to 5.0%~~2009 would remain at the -2.7 percent level that it had predicted in ~~2006, which was attributable primarily to slow net export growth.~~April. Still, this year’s contraction would be Thailand’s first since 1998. The World Bank ~~has projected~~currently forecasts that Thai ~~economic~~GDP growth ~~in 2008 to~~will be approximately ~~4.6% followed by 5.2%~~3.5% in ~~2009.~~

2010.

A substantial portion of the Company’s Thai operations, which accounted for approximately ~~48.8%~~32.9% of the Company’s net sales in ~~2007,~~2009, consists of the manufacture of telecommunications and power cable and sales of those products for use in large-scale telecommunications projects and various construction projects in Thailand. The volume of sales of these products tends to correlate with the general level of economic activity in Thailand. As a result, the performance of the Company’s Thai operations depends in significant part on the general state of the Thai economy. Infrastructure development and related construction projects in Thailand depend significantly upon government sponsored initiatives. In recent years, the level of government involvement in infrastructure development has tended to track increases or contractions in Thailand’s gross domestic product ~~(‘‘GDP’’~~(“GDP”). Overall, the construction industry and infrastructure ~~projec ts~~projects have slowed considerably, thereby affecting local sales, placing competitive pressure on prices and prompting the Company to rationalize Thai operations and actively seek overseas export markets.

Telecommunications

~~Telecommunications~~

Sales of the Company’s telecommunication products in Thailand have depended to a significant degree on the substantial investment in and development of the telecommunications sector by the Thai government. In particular, the Company’s sales of manufactured products are affected by the dollar value of contracts awarded by the government for telecommunications and other infrastructure projects.

Historically, control of the telecommunications sector in Thailand, including the right to grant concessions for the installation and operation of telecommunications services, has rested with state owned enterprises. There are currently three public agencies responsible for communications in Thailand: TOT, which controls domestic telephone service, the CAT Telecom Plc. ~~(‘‘CAT’’~~(“CAT”), which handles postal and international telephone service, and the Thailand Post Co., Ltd. (a state enterprise), which controls and regulates the use of frequencies for radio communication stations and satellite communication networks. Telecommunications services in Thailand have traditionally been developed and expanded through grants by TOT and CAT of concessions to private operators to install and operate telecom projects on a build-transfer-operate basis, where the government enterprise involved would maintain control over the award of the concession and ~~recei ve~~receive a profit share from the operations of the project.

Power

In Thailand the prevailing historical trend has been that economic growth would stimulate rapid growth in the demand for electric power, and annual rates of growth in electricity demand would outpace annual economic growth rates. Despite the rapid growth in electricity demand, electricity consumption in Thailand

remains low by international standards. The Company believes that, in the medium to longer term, there will be an increased demand for power supply which will lead to increased demand for the Company’s power cable products from both developers of power production facilities and contractors installing power supply lines.

Singapore

The Singapore government reported that the economy grew ~~7.7%~~by 4.63% in ~~2007. The growth was partially attributable~~2009, as compared to the ~~efforts of the Singapore government to attract and retain foreign investments as a priority matter. Much of the economy’s~~1.1% growth recorded in ~~2007 came from increased exports of electronics, pharmaceuticals and chemicals.~~2008. The Singapore government has projected ~~lower growth of 4.0%~~its gross domestic product from -2.8% in December 2009 to ~~6.0%~~13.1% in ~~2008~~2010 (first quarter data) due to worldwide economic conditions.

The Company’s distribution and project engineering business segments are concentrated in the ~~expected U.S. economy slowdown.~~

Singapore market. SDI projects, on one hand, are blessed with Singapore sponsored Casino phrase I with substantial revenue of $32.8 million coming in, while the distributed business, suffered lack of projects or lost price competition to Korean based companies, down by more than $4 million in 2009.

The Singapore government has established targets to increase the population from ~~the current~~ 4.6 million in 2007 to approximately 6 million by the end of 2020. This planned growth in population is expected to result in an increase in demand for residential property and construction.

China

The economy of China differs from that of most developed free-market economies in a number of respects, including structure, degree of government involvement, level of development, growth rate, capital reinvestment, allocation of resources, rate of inflation and balance of payments position. In recent years, the PRC government has implemented economic reform measures which emphasize decentralization, utilization of market forces and the development of foreign investment projects, of which SPFO and Shanghai Yayang are examples.

~~The~~

According to the November 2009 East Asia and Pacific Update published by the World Bank, the Chinese ~~economy is reported~~GDP growth projection was 8.7% in 2009 as compared to ~~have expanded by 11.4%~~9.0% in ~~2007, as a result of fiscal stimulus and robust external demand. Exports and imports continue~~2008. According to ~~surge. Fixed-asset investment, a crucial component of China’s economic growth, rose during~~that update, the ~~period partly as a result of increased public expenditure on infrastructure projects and technology upgrades of state-owned entities. The~~ World Bank has ~~projected~~forecasted China ~~economic~~GDP growth in ~~2008~~2010 to be approximately ~~9.7% followed by 9.6% in 2009.~~

9.5%.

~~4.3Organizational Structure~~

~~Thailand~~

The Company’s Thai operations are conducted by Siam Pacific, which produces telecommunications cable, power cable and enameled wire for the domestic market, Pacific Thai, a specialized producer of enameled wire for the export market and Charoong Thai, which manufactures power telecommunications cables and, through its subsidiaries, provides telecommunication and network services. As of December 31, 2005, the Company effectively owned 52.43% of the interests in Siam Pacific, Pacific Thai and Charoong Thai. By 2007, the Company’s effective ownership interest in those three entities had been reduced to 50.93%, with the decrease in the Company’s percentage ownership being attributable to the exercise of warrants or conversion of convertible securities by third parties. The Company’s present intention is to maintain majority ownership of the voting securities of Charoong Thai.

Siam Pacific was established in 1988 as a joint venture between PEWC and Ital-Thai, which is the largest diversified construction company in Thailand and is principally engaged in the design, engineering, construction and project management of large-scale civil engineering and telecommunications projects in Thailand. Capitalizing on PEWC’s wire and cable manufacturing expertise and Ital-Thai’s significant presence in the local market, the Company was able to establish its presence in this market and gain knowledge of business opportunities in Thailand.

Pacific Thai was established in 1989 and is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Siam Pacific. Pacific Thai produces enameled wire for export only and has a special tax status which exempts it from import duties on raw materials used in export manufacturing. This special tax status must be renewed each year.

Charoong Thai is a public company listed on the Stock Exchange of Thailand (‘‘SET’’). It manufactures aluminum and copper electric wire, medium and high voltage power cable and telecommunications cable. It has subsidiaries and affiliates in the businesses of optic fiber cable manufacturing and telecommunication and network services. Charoong Thai was established in Thailand in 1967 as a limited public company. The board of directors of Charoong Thai may authorize the issuance of additional shares of common stock of Charoong Thai. The Company has preemptive rights to purchase an amount of additional shares equal to its pro rata share of the additional authorized shares, less amounts reserved for directors, officers and employees. In the event the board of Charoong Thai decides to cause it to issue those additional shares, the Company may decide not to exercise this right, in which case the Company’s interest may be diluted.

Siam Pacific and Charoong Thai are two of the five largest telecommunications and power cable and wire manufacturers in Thailand and are two of the five government-approved suppliers of telecommunications cable for major public telecommunications projects.

As part of its restructuring plan, the Company has merged its Thai operations, which has generated cost savings while improving overall efficiency. The Company believes the synergistic effect of merging these operations will continue to produce significant savings in overhead cost as it facilitates the centralization of decision making and resource allocation for the Thai operations.

~~Singapore~~

The Company’s Singapore operations are conducted primarily through its 98.3%-owned subsidiary, Sigma Cable. The Company believes that Sigma Cable is the largest producer of low voltage power cable products in Singapore. Sigma Cable manufactures and sells a range of low voltage power cable products, used mainly in infrastructure projects and commercial and residential developments. Sigma Cable is also the exclusive distributor in Singapore of copper rod and medium and high voltage wire and cable manufactured by PEWC.

Sigma Cable also has project engineering operations in Singapore to supply, deliver and install (‘‘SDI’’) primarily medium and high voltage cable to power transmission projects. While the Company

currently obtains its supply of medium and high voltage power cable for its SDI operations from PEWC, other suppliers are also available if necessary. The Company anticipates that there will be increasing demand for medium and high voltage power cable and related turnkey installation projects in Singapore.

The Company owns Sigma-Epan, which ceased manufacturing operations in Singapore and Malaysia in May 2007 due primarily to decreasing sales revenues, taxes imposed by the Malaysian government, inadequate machinery, and high overhead costs. Sigma-Epan consisted of a primarily Singapore-based group of companies engaged in the manufacture of specialty cables and assembled cable harnesses for the electronics, computer, building automation, audio and communication industries. It achieved ISO 9002 certification for its quality management system in 1990. Its customers were largely multinational original equipment manufacturers and its export markets included Malaysia, the Philippines, Indonesia, Thailand, Australia, New Zealand, China and the U.S. Since Sigma-Epan ceased operations, the Company no longer manufactures specialty electronic cables.

~~Australia~~

The Company has an effective 98.53% ownership interest in APEC, an Australian wire and cable distributor, which commenced operations at its power cable manufacturing facility in Queensland near Brisbane, Australia in 1997. The new facility produces low voltage power cable with a targeted production capacity of 2,000 tons per year.

APEC has historically sold its production output to Australian distributors and major wholesalers that have been primarily dependent upon imports from other countries. In 1998, it established a sales office with warehousing facilities in Sydney, New South Wales to attract and service customers in this region of Australia. In 2000, it established another sales office with warehousing facilities in Melbourne, Victoria. In 2002, a sales office in Perth was established. APEC bids for supply contracts in state and national power development projects in Australia.

~~China~~

The Company has a 54.41% effective interest in Shanghai Yayang, a company in Shanghai, China. Shanghai Yayang is a joint venture company manufacturing enameled wire which was formed in 1998, and is a subsidiary of Pacific Thai. Shanghai Yayang manufactures enameled wire with a diameter of between 0.05mm and 2.5mm.

SPFO is a joint venture company in Yanggu County, Shandong Province, China. SPFO was established to manufacture fiber optic cables for the China market. The Company owns a 51% interest in SPFO with the remaining interest owned by the joint-venture partner, Shandong Yanggu Cable Company (‘‘Shandong Yanggu’’), an established manufacturer in Shandong Province that produces a wide range of cable products and is considered one of the leading cable producers in China. The Company has invested a total of $2.8 million in SPFO.

~~The Company owns a 25% interest in Shandong Pacific Rubber Cable Company, Ltd. (‘‘SPRC’’), which manufactures rubber cable for the China market. The remaining 75% is owned by Shandong Yanggu.~~

On August 18, 2001, a joint-venture agreement was signed with Shandong Yanggu to establish Shandong Huayu Pacific Fiber Optics Communication Co., Ltd. (‘‘SHP’’) for the manufacture of optic fibers. The Company has invested in excess of $5.0 million for a 49% interest in SHP, with the remaining interest in SHP being held by Shandong Yanggu. The projected production rate was initially set at 900,000 km of optic fibers annually. Due to weak market outlook, the actual commencement of operations has been put on hold.

On March 22, 2002, the Company acquired two companies, namely, Crown Century Holdings Limited (‘‘CCH’’) and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Pacific Electric Wire & Cable (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. (‘‘PEWS’’) from PEWC, the then majority shareholder of the Company. The acquisition was in exchange for 3,097,436 new shares of the Company issued to PEWC. PEWS manufactures enameled

wire for electronic, video and audio products for the South China market and for export. CCH is the trading arm of PEWS. The operations of PEWS and CCH have been profitable since 1999 and have contributed to the profits of the Company in 2007.

Until 2006, the Company owned a 94.31% interest in NPC. NPC manufactured a range of telecommunications cable and LAN electronic cables in Yinjiang Town, Zhejiang Province, China. NPC began commercial production of high quality telecommunications cable in December 1996. Total production capacity of the NPC operations was approximately 800,000 pkm per year.

NPC’s primary customers were the government controlled and regulated telecommunications networks operators, in particular their provincial and local offices in eastern China and major subcontractors bidding for government contracts.

The term of the NPC joint venture was 50 years commencing from December 31, 1993, the date the joint venture received its business license. The joint venture agreement permitted early termination with the consent of all the joint venture partners or following a serious breach by one of the joint venture partners of the terms of the joint venture contract. The joint venture agreement provided that the partners share in the profits in proportion to their equity interests in the joint venture. In 2006, the Company terminated the NPC joint venture due to lack of profitability, unsatisfactory management practices, the lack of qualified executives to assume management responsibility following termination of the then senior managers, and the lack of promising prospects for the business in the short to medium term.

4.4Property, ~~Plant~~Plants and Equipment

The Company’s manufactured products are produced at facilities located on premises owned or leased by Siam Pacific, Pacific Thai, Charoong Thai, Sigma Cable, ~~Sigma-Epan (until May 2007),~~ APEC, ~~NPC (until 2006),~~ Shanghai Yayang, SPFO and PEWS.

As The following is a summary of the Company’s material facilities and operations as of December 31, ~~2007, the summary status of the Company’s facilities and operations was as follows:~~

2009.

Siam Pacific owns a 7.45 acre production facility near Bangkok, Thailand, located on a 26.79 acre site that it also owns. Telecommunications cable and enameled wire are manufactured here. The production facility ~~is mortgaged~~constitutes a portion of certain property and assets which are part of a mortgage to Bangkok Bank as security for a ~~$9.0 million~~$242,000 line of credit. Pacific Thai operates a separate 92,800 square meter enameled wire production facility located at the same site, which it leases from Siam Pacific.

Charoong Thai owns a 24.7 acre production facility in Chachoengsao province, near Bangkok, ~~Thailand.~~Thailand, where telecommunications cable and power cable are manufactured. The production facility is located on a 57.9 acre site which Charoong Thai also owns. Neither the production facility nor the land is mortgaged.

Sigma Cable ~~operates at a production facility~~produces power cable on a 19,373 square meter site in Singapore leased from the Jurong Town Corporation ~~(‘‘JTC’’~~(“JTC”) for 30 years from September 16, 2000 to September 16, 2030. JTC is a government-linked corporation and is Singapore’s largest industrial landlord.

Sigma-Epan leased an office space from Sigma Cable in Singapore and operated two factory units in Johore Bahru and Penang, both in Malaysia. Both manufacturing operations of Sigma-Epan were terminated as of 2007, but Sigma-Epan continues to employ eight individuals in its trading operations.

APEC owns a 6,735 square meter power cable manufacturing facility on a 39,000 square meter land parcel in Brisbane, Australia, which is mortgaged to Westpac Banking Corporation of Australia as security for a bank facility of approximately ~~Australian $10~~A$10 million.

Shanghai Yayang operates a factory that produces enameled wire, located in an area of approximately 27,839 square meters of state-owned land in an industrial district in Fengxian, Shanghai. The entire factory is mortgaged to the Agricultural Bank of China for a bank credit line of $6.6 million.

SPFO manufactures fiber optic cable in a purpose-built factory building of approximately 8,100 square meters on a leasehold of 63,332 square meters of state-owned land in Yanggu, Shandong Province, China, which land is shared equally with Shandong Huayu Pacific Fiber Optics Communication Co., Ltd.

PEWS manufactures enameled wire in a facility on 36,000 square meters of state-owned land with a built-up area of 20,367 square meters in Long Gang, Shenzhen, China. A leasehold right of industrial land use for the land has been granted for 49 years. The facility is mortgaged to Agricultural Bank of China as security for a RMB 50 million bank loan granted in 2003 and extended through 2009.

Sigma-Epan leases an office space from Sigma Cable in Singapore where it employs nine individuals in its trading operations.

NPC ~~operated~~manufactured telecommunications cable on 10.9 acres of state-owned land in Ningbo, Yinjiang, Zhejian Province, China, with a factory area of 3.3 acres. A leasehold right of industrial land use for the land was granted for 50 years. Manufacturing operations at NPC were terminated in 2006. NPC continues to hold the leasehold right of the land and maintains ten employees.

~~Shanghai Yayang operates~~ The company, thru previously mentioned bank loan opportunity, is expecting to revitalize NPC’s production facilities and is planning to introduce a ~~factory, partially mortgaged~~brand new product category. The management has undergone a series of discussion meetings and the entire program is set to ~~a finance company, located~~go once the loan agreement is signed in ~~an area of approximately 5,000 square meters of state-owned land in an industrial district in Fengxian, Shanghai.~~

the near future.

~~SPFO operates in a purpose-built factory building on a leasehold state-owned land in Yanggu, Shandong Province, China.~~

PEWS operates on 36,000 square meters of state-owned land with a built-up area of 20,367 square meters in Long Gang, Shenzhen, China. A leasehold right of industrial land use for the land has been granted for 50 years. The facility is mortgaged to Agricultural Bank of China as security for a Rmb 14 million bank facility granted in 2003.

~~The Company’s primary operating facilities as of December 31, 2007 are briefly described below:~~


~~Location~~	~~Company~~	~~Products~~
~~Bangkok, Thailand~~	~~Siam Pacific~~	~~Telecommunications cable, power cable, enameled wire~~
~~Bangkok, Thailand~~	~~Pacific Thai~~	~~Enameled wire~~
~~Bangkok, Thailand~~	~~Charoong Thai~~	~~Telecommunications cable, power cable~~
~~Shanghai, China~~	~~Shanghai Yayang~~	~~Enameled wire~~
~~Yanggu, China~~	~~SPFO~~	~~Fiber optic cable~~
~~Shenzhen, China~~	~~PEWS~~	~~Enameled wire~~
~~Singapore~~	~~Sigma Cable~~	~~Power cable, SDI project engineering, distributed products~~
~~Singapore and Malaysia~~	~~Sigma-Epan~~	~~Electronic cable (until May 2007)~~
~~Brisbane, Australia~~	~~APEC~~	~~Power cable~~

All of the Company’s facilities in ~~Bangkok,~~Thailand, Singapore, ~~Brisbane~~Australia and China use production processes and equipment of international standard imported from Europe, the United States, Taiwan, and Japan.

The production capacity and extent of utilization of the Company’s facilities varies from time to time and such information is considered to be commercially sensitive and proprietary information.

Other than NPC, there are no major expansion plans going on at any other manufacturing sites at the moment.

4.5 Insurance

The Company maintains insurance policies covering certain buildings, machinery and equipment against specified amounts of damage or loss caused by fire, flooding, other natural disasters and burglary and theft. The Company does not carry insurance for consequential loss arising from business interruptions or political disturbances and does not carry product liability insurance. The Company believes that it maintains insurance coverage commensurate with the nature of and risks associated with its business.

4.6 Environmental Matters

The Company is subject to a variety of laws and regulations covering the storage, handling, emission and discharge of materials into the environment. The Company believes that all of its operations are in compliance with, and in certain circumstances exceed, all applicable environmental laws and regulations. The Company has not been subject to any legal, regulatory or other action alleging violations or breaches of environmental standards. While it is difficult to estimate future environmental compliance costs and potential liabilities, if

any, accurately, the Company does not currently anticipate any material adverse effect on its consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash flows as a result of compliance with these laws.

Item 5: Operating and Financial Review and Prospects

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with ~~the annual~~our audited consolidated financial statements ~~including~~and the notes ~~to those financial statements, which are included with this Annual Report.~~thereto incorporated by reference herein. Because ~~more than 90%~~around 83% of the Company’s revenues are derived from its manufactured products segment, the following discussion is not presented on a segment basis.

5.1 Disclosures of Critical Accounting Policies

Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations discusses the Company’s consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. On an ongoing basis, management evaluates its estimates and judgments. Management bases its estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from ~~othe r~~other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

Management believes the following critical accounting policies, among others, affect its more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of its consolidated financial statements.

~~Inventories~~

Inventory

Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market value. Cost is determined using the first-in, first-out or weighted average method.

If the expected sales price less completion costs and costs to execute sales (net realizable value) is lower than the carrying amount, a write-down is charged to expenses in cost of sales for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds its net realizable value. When the finished goods that were previously written down to net realizable value are subsequently sold at above net realizable value, a recovery is credited to cost of sales. See Note 9 — Valuation and Qualifying Accounts.

Income Taxes

In 2007, the Company adopted the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation No. 48 (FIN 48), “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes-an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109.” (codified within FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 740, “Income Taxes”). FASB ASC 740 contains a two-step approach to recognizing and measuring uncertain tax positions. The first step is to evaluate the tax position for recognition by determining if the weight of available evidence indicates it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained on audit, including resolution of related appeals or litigation processes, if any. The second step is to measure the tax benefit as the largest amount, which is more than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. The Company considers many factors when evaluating and estimating its tax positions and tax benefits, which may require periodic adjustments and which may not accurately anticipate actual outcomes. Our policy is to recognize interest expense and penalties related to income tax matters as a component of income tax expense.

Current income tax expense is the amount of income taxes expected to be payable for the current year. Deferred income tax balances reflect the effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities and their tax basis and are stated at enacted tax rates expected to be in effect when taxes

are actually paid or recovered. FASB ASC 740, requires that deferred tax assets be evaluated for future realization and reduced by a valuation allowance to the extent the Company believes a portion will not be realized. The Company considers many factors when assessing the ~~ultimate~~likelihood of future realization of ~~inventories, we~~its deferred tax assets, including our recent cumulative earnings experience and expectations of future taxable income by taxing jurisdiction, the carry-forward periods available to the Company for tax reporting purposes, and other relevant factors. Deferred income tax expense (benefit) is the net change during the year in the deferred income tax asset or liability.

Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, plant and equipment are ~~required~~stated at cost less depreciation and any impairment losses. Asset leases qualifying as capital leases are also included in property, plant and equipment. Major renewals and improvements are capitalized and minor replacements, maintenance, and repair expenses are charged to ~~make judgments~~current operations as ~~to future market requirements compared with current inventory levels. Revisions to our allowance for inventories may be required if actual market requirements differ from our estimates.~~

~~The management at~~incurred. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets or the respective ~~subsidiaries conducts a thorough review of the inventory~~lease term, whichever is shorter, as follows:


Land		Nil
Land Use Rights		15-50 years
Buildings		5-30 years
Machinery and Equipment		5-10 years
Motor Vehicles		3-10 years
Office Equipment		3-10 years

Depreciation for 2007, 2008 and 2009 amounted to $9,079, $7646 and $8,941, respectively. No depreciation expense is charged for construction in ~~all of its product lines~~progress and machinery and equipment under installation.

Capitalized interest on ~~a regular basis. The allowances for inventories are made~~construction in progress is added to reduce excess inventories to their estimated net realizable values, as necessary. The subsidiaries will take into consideration their best estimates of product sales prices, copper prices and customer demand patterns. The estimates used by the Company to determine its allowance for inventory losses may be more or less than the actual amount or results. The subsidiaries will also evaluate inventory on a regular basis for obsolete or slow-moving items to ascertain if the recorded allowance is reasonable and adequate. Inventory is written down for estimated obsolescence or unmarketable inventory equal to the difference between the cost of ~~inventory~~the underlying asset and is depreciated over the estimated ~~net realizable value based upon assumptions about future demand and market conditions.~~

~~Carrying Values~~

~~Valuations are required under accounting principles generally accepted~~useful life of the asset in the ~~United States~~same manner as the underlying asset. No interest is capitalized in 2008 and 2009.

When property and equipment are retired, sold or otherwise disposed of, the asset’s carrying amount and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any gain or loss is included in operations.

In 2006, the Company terminated the NPC joint venture and liquidated its major equipment at the NPC facility. In October 2009, the Company made a resolution to ~~determine~~acquire an additional 5.42% shareholding of NPC from the ~~carrying~~Republic of China (“PRC”) joint venture partner. The Company plans to resume manufacturing operations with new constructed facilities at the NPC site. The acquisition of the additional shareholding is expected to be completed in July 2010.

Goodwill

Goodwill represents the excess of the cost of purchased business over the fair value of ~~various~~the underlying net assets. ~~Our most significant assets~~Goodwill, including goodwill associated with equity method investments, is not amortized, but tested for impairment at least annually or more frequently if circumstances indicate that ~~require management to prepare or obtain valuations are~~impairment may exist. The Company identifies potential goodwill ~~and deferred income taxes. Management must identify whether events have occurred that may impact~~impairment by comparing the ~~carrying~~fair value of ~~these assets and make assumptions regarding future events, such as profitability. Differences between~~a reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill. The Company determines fair value using a discounted cash flow approach. If the ~~assumptions used to prepare these valuations and actual results could materially impact~~fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, goodwill of the reporting unit is not considered impaired. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the amount of goodwill impairment loss, if any, must be measured. The Company measures the amount of goodwill impairment loss by comparing the implied fair value of goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill. If the carrying amount of the reporting unit goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of goodwill, an impairment loss is recognized as an operating expense.

Goodwill primarily resulted from a business combination. The Company adopted ASC 350, “Intangibles-Goodwill and Other”, effective January 1, 2002. Under ASC 350, goodwill is no longer amortized but is subject to periodic impairment tests. ASC 350 defines a reporting unit as an operating segment or one level below an operating segment (referred to as a component). A component of an operating segment is a reporting unit if the component constitutes a business for which discrete financial information is available and segment management regularly reviews the operating results of that component. Upon adoption of ASC 350, the Company allocated the entire amount of goodwill to the manufactured products segment.

In accordance with ASC 350, the Company reviews goodwill for impairment on an annual basis (December 31) or more frequently if events or circumstances indicate that the carrying values may not be recoverable. Based on the Company’s assessment conducted as of December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009, no impairment was indicated. Total goodwill was $8,801, $8,801 and $8,801 as of December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009, respectively.

Investments

Management determines the appropriate classification of its investment at the time of purchase and re-evaluates such designation as of each balance sheet date.

The Company accounts for its long-term investments that represent less than 20 percent ownership using ASC 320, “Investments — Debt and Equity Securities” (ASC 320). Equity securities are classified as available-for-sale, as the Company does not trade in these ~~assets~~securities, but rather they are held as longer term investments due to business relationships with the entities. Available-for-sale securities are carried at fair value, with the unrealized gains and losses, net ~~earnings.~~

of tax, reported in a separate component of shareholders’ equity. Realized gains and losses and declines in values judged to be other-than-temporary on available-for-sale securities are included in investment income. The cost of securities sold is based on the specific identification method. Interest and dividends on securities classified as available-for-sale are included in investment income.

Investments

in which the Company does not have a controlling interest or an ownership voting interest to exert significant influence, and which are not publicly traded are accounted for at cost.

determining whether an other-than-temporary decline in value has occurred include: the market value of the security in relation to its cost basis; the financial condition of the investee; and the intent and ability to retain the investment for a sufficient period of time to allow for recovery in the market value of the investment.

In 2007, 2008 and 2009, the Company recorded an impairment charge of ~~$0.1 million~~$117, $nil and $nil, respectively, related to investment in ~~Shandong Huayu Pacific Fiber Optics Communication Co., Ltd. (‘‘SHP’’)~~certain equity investees.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

The Company accounts for impairment of long-lived assets in accordance with ASC 360, “Property, Plant and Equipment”. Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. In such instances, the Company estimates the undiscounted future cash flows that result from the use of the asset and its ultimate disposition. If the sum of the undiscounted cash flows is less than the carrying value, the Company recognizes an impairment loss, measured as the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair value of the asset, determined principally using discounted cash flows.

In 2009, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $77 related to the impairment of factory in Thailand (included in the manufactured products segment) that is not being used for operation. The impairment charge was recorded to reduce the carrying value of the identified assets to fair values. Fair values were derived using a variety of methodologies, including cash flow analysis, estimates of sales proceeds and independent appraisals. Where cash flow analyses were used to estimate fair values, key assumptions employed, included estimates of future growth, estimates of gross margins and estimates of the impact of inflation. The charges were primarily the result of management’s revised outlook due to ~~an oversupply~~the prolonged unfavorable market conditions.

Trade Account Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

Trade accounts receivable are stated at face value less any allowances for doubtful accounts. The Company maintains allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of ~~products~~its customers to make required payments. Management considers the following factors when determining the collectability of specific customer accounts: customer credit-worthiness, customer financial condition, past transaction history with the customer, current economic industry trends, and changes in ~~the market at Shandong and the suspension of construction of the SHP production line.~~

customer payment terms.

Revenue Recognition

Sales ~~represent~~represents the invoiced value of goods sold, net of value added tax and returns, commission income earned on distribution activities, and service fee income on installation activities. Revenue is recognized to the extent that it is probable that the economic benefits will flow to the Company and the revenue can be reliably measured. The following specific recognition criteria ~~summarized in the next succeeding paragraph~~ must also be met before revenue is recognized.

Sales of goods and distribution activities

The Company recognizes revenue from the sale of goods and distribution activities upon passage of title to the customer ~~which~~that coincides with their delivery and acceptance. This method of revenue recognition is in accordance with ~~Staff Accounting Bulletin, SAB 104 — ‘‘Revenue Recognition~~ASC 650-15, “Revenue Recognition-Products”.

The Company classifies shipping and handling costs incurred in ~~Financial Statements.’’~~

~~A portion~~cost of ~~our~~sales.

Installation activities

The Company recognizes revenue ~~is generated~~ from installation activities ~~which are recognized~~ using the percentage-of-completion ~~method. Recognized revenues~~method, based on the customer certification of the distance of cable laid with respect to the estimated total contract revenue, and ~~profit are subject to revisions~~in accordance with ASC 650-35, “Revenue Recognition-Construction-Type and Production-Type Contracts”.

When elements such as ~~the activity progresses to completion.~~

~~We allocate revenue from~~ installation and sale of cables are contained in a single arrangement, or in related arrangements with the same customer, the Company allocates revenue to each element based on ~~their~~its relative fair ~~values.~~value in accordance with ASC 605-25, “Revenue Recognition-Multiple-Element Arrangements”. The allocation of the fair value to the delivered elements is limited to the amount that is not contingent on future delivery of services or subject to ~~customer-specific~~customer-specified return or refund privileges.

Product Warranties

The Company provides for the estimated cost of product warranties based on the warranty policy and historical experience, and accrues for specific items at the time their existence is known and the amounts ~~of revenue recognized is impacted by our judgments as to whether an arrangement includes multiple elements. Changes~~are determinable. Historical warranty liability and related costs have not been significant to the ~~elements in an arrangement could affect the timing~~Company’s operations.

Foreign Currency Translation and Transactions

The functional currency of the ~~revenue recognition.~~

~~Deferred Income Taxes~~

~~The Company records a valuation allowance to reduce its deferred tax assets to~~Company’s international subsidiaries is generally the ~~amount that is more likely than not to be realized. While~~local currency or U.S. Dollars. For these subsidiaries, the Company ~~has considered future taxable~~translates the assets and liabilities at exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date and income and ~~ongoing prudent~~expense accounts at average exchange rates during the year. Resulting currency translation adjustments are recorded directly to accumulated other comprehensive income within stockholders’ equity. Gains and feasible tax planning strategies in assessing the need for valuation allowance, in the event the Company was to determine that it would be able to realize its deferred tax assets in the future in excess of its recorded amount, an adjustment to the deferred tax asset would increase income in the period such determination was made. Likewise, should the Company determine that it would not be able to realize all or part of its net deferred tax asset in the future, an adjustment to the deferred tax asset would be charged to income in the period such determination was made.

~~Bad Debt~~

~~The Company maintains allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated~~ losses resulting from transactions in non-functional currencies are recorded in the ~~inability~~consolidated statement of ~~its customers~~operations.

Foreign currency transactions are recorded at the applicable rates of exchange in effect at the transaction dates. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies at the balance sheet date are translated at the applicable rates of exchange in effect at that date. Gains and losses from foreign currency transactions are recorded in the consolidated statement of operations.

Foreign Currency Forward Contracts

The Company’s subsidiaries use forward foreign exchange contracts to reduce their exposure to foreign currency risk for liabilities denominated in foreign currency. A forward foreign exchange contract obligates the Company to exchange predetermined amounts of specified foreign currencies at specified exchange rates on specified dates or to make ~~required payments. If~~an equivalent U.S. dollar payment equal to the value of such exchange. Realized and unrealized gains and losses on foreign exchange contracts are included as foreign exchange gains or losses in the consolidated statement of operations.

The Company recognizes derivative financial ~~condition~~instruments in the consolidated financial statements at fair value regardless of the ~~Company’s customers were to deteriorate, resulting~~purposes or intent for holding the instrument. Changes in ~~an impairment of their ability to make payments, additional allowances may be required.~~

~~Impairment of Long-Lived Assets~~

~~We evaluate~~ the ~~carrying~~fair value of ~~our long-lived assets, consisting primarily~~derivative financial instruments are either recognized periodically in income or in shareholders’ equity as a component of ~~property plant~~comprehensive income depending on whether the derivative financial instruments qualify for hedge accounting, and ~~equipment, whenever certain events~~if so, whether they qualify as a fair value or cash flow hedge.

Generally, changes in ~~circumstances indicate that the carrying amount~~fair values of ~~these assets may not be recoverable. In 2007, the Company did not record any impairment of long-lived assets.~~

~~Recent Pronouncements~~

~~In September 2006, FASB issued Statement No. 157 — ‘‘Fair Value Measurements’’ (‘‘SFAS 157’’), which defines~~derivatives accounted for as fair value ~~establishes a framework for measuring fair value~~hedges are recorded in ~~generally~~

~~accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The provisions~~income along with the portions of ~~this standard apply to other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements. SFAS 157 became effective for us on January 1, 2008. Upon adoption,~~ the ~~provisions of SFAS 157 are to be applied prospectively with limited exceptions.~~

In September 2006, FASB Statement No. 158 — ‘‘Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans – an Amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R)’’ (‘‘SFAS 158’’), was issued. This statement requires an employer that sponsors one or more defined benefit pension or other postretirement plans to recognize an asset or liability for the overfunded or underfunded status of its postretirement benefit planschanges in ~~its balance sheet for years ending after December 15, 2006. The funded status is measured as the difference between~~ the fair value of the ~~plan’s assets~~hedged items that relate to the hedged risks. Changes in fair value of derivatives accounted for as cash flow hedges, to the extent they are effective as hedges, are recorded in other comprehensive income net of deferred taxes. Changes in fair value of derivatives used as hedges of the net investment in foreign operations are reported in other comprehensive income as part of the cumulative translation adjustment. Changes in fair values of derivatives not qualifying as hedges are reported in income.

As of December 31, 2007, 2008 and ~~its benefit obligation.~~2009, the Company has entered into forward exchange sale contracts with notional values of $12,674, $3,500 and $nil, respectively. As of December 31, 2008, the Company has entered into forward exchange purchase contracts with a notional value of $15,458. The ~~statement also requires an employer to measure plan assets~~forward exchange contracts matured in January, February, March and ~~benefit obligations~~May 2009. There were no outstanding foreign forward exchange contracts as of ~~the date of the employer’s statement of financial position. SFAS 158 is effective for fiscal years ending after~~ December 15, 2006, except for the requ irement to measure plan assets and benefit obligations as of the statement of financial position date, which is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2008. Transition for the recognition provisions is entirely prospective. The effect of adopting SFAS 158 on the consolidated financial statements is presented in Note 18 to the Audited Financial Statements.

In September 2006, the FASB ratified EITF Issue No. 06-1 — ‘‘Accounting for Consideration Given by a Service Provider to Manufacturers or Resellers of Equipment Necessary for an End-Customer to Receive Service from the Service Provider’’ (‘‘EITF 06-1’’). This guidance requires the application of EITF Issue No. 01-9 — ‘‘Accounting for Consideration Given by a Vendor to a Customer’’ (‘‘EITF 01-9’’), when consideration is given to a reseller or manufacturer for benefit to the service provider’s end-customer. EITF 01-9 requires the consideration given to be recorded as a liability at the time of the sale of the equipment and also provides guidance for the classification of the expense. EITF 06-1 is effective for the first annual reporting period beginning after June 15, 2007.31, 2009. The Company ~~does not expect the adoption of EITF 06-1 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.~~

In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 159 — ‘‘The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities — Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115’’ (‘‘SFAS 159’’). SFAS 159 permits entities to choose to measure eligible itemsrecords these contracts at fair value ~~at specified election dates and report unrealized~~with the related gains and losses ~~on items~~in its statement of operations.

Earnings (Loss) Per Share

Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share are calculated in accordance with ASC 260, “Earnings Per Share”. There are no dilutive equity instruments.

Fair Value Measurements

Effective January 1, 2008, the Company adopted the provisions of ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” for ~~which the~~financial assets and liabilities. Under ASC 820, fair value ~~option has~~is defined as the price that would have been ~~elected~~received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (i.e., the “exit price”) in ~~earnings~~an orderly transaction between market participants at ~~each subsequent reporting~~the measurement date. ~~SFAS 159~~

In determining fair value, the Company uses various valuation approaches. ASC 820 establishes a hierarchy for inputs used in measuring fair value that maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs by requiring that the most observable inputs be used when available. Observable inputs are inputs that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability developed based on market data obtained from sources independent of the Company. Unobservable inputs are inputs that reflect the Company’s assumptions about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability developed based on the best information available in the circumstances. The hierarchy is broken down into three levels based on the observability of inputs as follows:

	•		Level 1 — Valuations based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets that the Company has the ability to access. Valuation adjustments and block discounts are not applied to Level 1 instruments. Since valuations are based on quoted prices that are readily and regularly available in an active market, valuation of these products does not entail a significant degree of judgment.

	•		Level 2 — Valuations based on one or more quoted prices in markets that are not active or for which all significant inputs are observable, either directly or indirectly.

	•		Level 3 — Valuations based on unobservable inputs which are supported by little or no market activity and significant to the overall fair value measurement.

The availability of observable inputs can vary from investment to investment and is affected by a wide variety of factors, including, for example, the type of investment, the liquidity of markets and other characteristics particular to the transaction. To the extent that valuation is based on models or inputs that are less observable or unobservable in the market, the determination of fair value requires more judgment and the investments are categorizes as Level 3.

The carrying amounts of financial instruments carried at cost, including cash and cash equivalents, bank deposits, trade receivables, other current assets, trade payables, related party balances and other liabilities approximate their fair value due to the short-term maturities of such instruments.

Recent Pronouncements

The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) effective for ~~fiscal years beginning~~financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after ~~November~~September 15, ~~2007. We do not believe~~2009. The ASC is an aggregation of previously issued authoritative U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) in one comprehensive set of guidance organized by subject area. In accordance with the ~~adoption of SFAS 159 will~~ASC, references to previously issued accounting standards have ~~significant impact on our consolidated financial statements.~~

In June 2007, the FASB ratified EITF Issue No. 07-3 — ‘‘Accounting for Nonrefundable Advance Payments for Goods or Services Received for Use in Future Research and Development Activities’’ (‘‘EITF 07-3’’). This issue provides that nonrefundable advance payments for goods or services thatbeen replaced by ASC references. Subsequent revisions to GAAP will be ~~used or rendered for future research and development activities should be deferred and capitalized. Such amounts should be recognized as an expense as~~incorporated into the related goods are delivered or the related services are performed. EITF 07-3 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2007. The Company does not expect the adoption of EIFT 07-3 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

ASC through Accounting Standards Updates (ASU).

In December 2007, ~~the~~ FASB issued ~~SFAS No. 141 (Revised 2007), Business Combinations (‘‘SFAS No. 141(R)’’)~~ASC 805, “Business Combinations”, which ~~establishes principles~~expands on the required disclosures better defines the acquirer and ~~requirements for~~ the ~~reporting entity~~acquisition date in a business combination, ~~including recognition~~ and ~~measurement in~~establishes principles for recognizing and measuring the ~~financial statements of the identifiable~~ assets acquired (including goodwill), the liabilities assumed and any non-controlling ~~interest~~interests in the ~~acquiree. This statement~~acquired business. FASB ASC 805 also ~~establishes disclosure requirements~~requires an acquirer to ~~enable financial statement users~~record an adjustment to ~~evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business combination. SFAS No. 141(R) applies prospectively~~income tax expense for changes in valuation allowances or uncertain tax positions related to acquired businesses. FASB ASC 805 is effective for all business combinations ~~for which the~~with an acquisition date ~~is on or after~~in the ~~beginning of the~~

first annual ~~reporting~~ period ~~beginning on or after~~following December 15, ~~2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early~~2008; early adoption is ~~prohibited.~~not permitted. The Company adopted this statement as of January 1, 2009 and the adoption has had no impact ~~of this standard is dependant upon~~to the ~~level of future acquisitions by the Company.~~

consolidated financial statements.

In December 2007, the FASB ~~issued SFAS No. 160 — ‘‘Non-controlling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements, an Amendment of ARB No. 51’’ (‘‘SFAS 160’’)~~amended ASC 810, “Consolidation”. ~~SFAS No. 160~~This amendment establishes accounting and reporting standards for the ~~non-controlling~~noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. It clarifies that a ~~non-controlling~~noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary is an ownership interest in the consolidated entity that should be reported as equity in the consolidated financial statements. ~~Additionally, SFAS No. 160 requires expanded disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. SFAS No. 160~~This amendment is effective for ~~fiscal years, and interim periods within those~~ fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008. The ~~Company is currently assessing~~adoption of this amendment did not have a material impact on the ~~potential impact~~Company’s consolidated results of ~~SFAS No. 160 on its~~operations and financial ~~statements.~~

condition.

In February 2008, the FASB ~~issued FASB Staff Position (‘‘FSP’’) FAS 157-1, ‘‘Application of FASB Statement No. 157 to FASB Statement No. 13~~amended ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurements and ~~Other Accounting Pronouncements That Address Fair Value Measurement for Purpose of Lease Classification of Measurement under Statement 13,’’~~Disclosures”, which amends SFAS 157 to exclude accounting pronouncements that address fair value measurements for purpose of lease classification or measurement under SFAS No. 13, ‘‘Accounting for Leases.’’ In February 2008, the FASB also issued FSP FAS 157-2 — ‘‘Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157,’’ which delaysdeferred the effective date of ~~SFAS 157 until the first quarter of fiscal 2010~~ASC 820 for ~~all~~one year for certain non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities, except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually). SFAS 157 does not require any new fair value measurements but rather eliminates inconsistencies in guidance found in various prior accounting pronouncements. SFAS 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years.liabilities. The Company ~~is currently assessing~~adopted this statement as of January 1, 2009 and the adoption has had no impact ~~SFAS 157 will have~~ on ~~its~~the Company’s financial position and results of ~~operations and financial position.~~

operations.

In March 2008, the FASB ~~issued SFAS No. 161 — ‘‘Disclosures about Derivative Instruments~~amended ASC 815, “Derivatives and ~~Hedging Activities, an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 133’’ (‘‘SFAS 161’’)~~Hedging”, which requires additional disclosures about the objectives of the derivative instruments and hedging activities, the method of accounting for such instruments under ~~SFAS No. 133~~ASC 815 and its related interpretations, and a tabular disclosure of the effects of such instruments and related hedged items on our financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. ~~SFAS 161~~This amendment will be effective for the Company in fiscal year 2010. The Company is currently assessing the potential impact that adoption of ~~SFAS 161~~this amendment may have on its financial statements.

In ~~May~~April 2008, the FASB ~~issued SFAS No. 162 — ‘‘~~amended ASC 350, “Intangibles-Goodwill and Other”, , the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under ASC 350. The ~~Hierarchy~~intent of ~~Generally Accepted Accounting Principles’’ (‘‘SFAS 162’’). The Statement identifies~~this amendment is to improve the ~~sources~~consistency between the useful life of ~~accounting principles~~a recognized intangible asset under ASC 350 and the ~~framework for selecting~~period of expected cash flows used to measure the principles to be used in the preparation of financial statements of nongovernmental entities that are presented in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) in the United States (the GAAP hierarchy). The current GAAP hierarchy, as set forth in the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) Statement on Auditing Standards No. 69, ‘‘The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity With Generally Accepted Accounting Principles,’’ has been criticized because (1) it is directed to the auditor rather than the entity, (2) it is complex, and (3) it ranks FASB Statements of Financial Accounting Concepts, which are subject to the same level o f due process as FASB Statements of Financial Accounting Standards, below industry practices that are widely recognized as generally accepted but that are not subject to due process. The Board believes that the GAAP hierarchy should be directed to entities because it is the entity (not its auditor) that is responsible for selecting accounting principles for financial statements that are presented in conformity with GAAP. Accordingly, the Board concluded that the GAAP hierarchy should reside in the accounting literature established by the FASB and is issuing this Statement to achieve that result. This Statement is effective 60 days following the SEC’s approvalfair value of the ~~Public Company Accounting Oversight Board amendments to AU Section 411, ‘‘The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity With Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.’’~~

In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 163, ‘‘Accounting for Financial Guarantee Insurance Contracts,’’ an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 60 (‘‘SFAS 163’’). Diversity exists in practice in accounting for financial guarantee insurance contracts by insurance enterprisesasset under ~~FASB Statement No. 60, Accounting~~ASC 805, “Business Combinations,” and ~~Reporting by Insurance Enterprises. That diversity results in inconsistencies in~~

~~the recognition and measurement of claim liabilities because of differing views about when a loss has been incurred under FASB Statement No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies.~~other U.S. GAAP. This Statement requires that an insurance enterprise recognize a claim liability prior to an event of default (insured event) when there is evidence that credit deterioration has occurred in an insured financial obligation. This Statement also clarifies how Statement 60 applies to financial guarantee insurance contracts, including the recognition and measurement toamendment will be used to account for premium revenue and claim liabilities. Those clarifications will increase comparability in financial reporting of financial guarantee insurance contracts by insurance enterprises. This Statement requires expanded disclosures about financial guarantee insurance contracts. The accounting and disclosure requirements of the Statement will improve the quality of information provided to users of financial statements. This Statement is effective for ~~financial s tatements issued~~the Company for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and ~~all~~interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is prohibited. The adoption of this amendment did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated results of operations and financial condition.

In September 2008, the FASB amended ASC 815, “Derivatives and Hedging”, which requires disclosures by sellers of credit derivatives, including credit derivatives embedded in a hybrid instrument. This amendment requires an additional disclosure about the current status of the payment/performance risk of a guarantee. This amendment applies to credit derivatives within the scope of ASC 815, hybrid instruments that have embedded credit derivatives, and guarantees within the scope of ASC 460, “Guarantees”. This amendment also pertains to hybrid instruments that have embedded credit derivatives (for example, credit-linked notes). The provisions of this amendment are effective for reporting periods (annual or interim) ending after November 15, 2008. This amendment encourages early adoption to facilitate comparisons at initial adoption. In periods after initial adoption, this amendment requires comparative disclosures only for periods ending subsequent to initial adoption. The adoption of this amendment did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated results of operations and financial condition.

In October 2008, the FASB amended ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures”, which clarifies the application of ASC 820in a market that is not active and provides an example to illustrate key considerations in determining the fair value of a financial asset when the market for that asset is not active. This amendment applies to financial assets within the scope of accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements in accordance with ASC 820. The amendment is effective upon issuance, including prior periods for which financial statements have not been issued. Revisions resulting from a change in the valuation technique or its application shall be accounted for as a change in accounting estimate in accordance with ASC 250, “Accounting Changes and Errors Correction”. The disclosure provisions of ASC 250 for a change in accounting estimate are not required for revisions resulting from a change in valuation technique or its application. The application of this amendment did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In November 2008, the FASB amended ASC 323, “Investments-Equity Method and Joint Ventures” , to clarify the accounting for certain transactions and impairment considerations involving equity method investments. The FASB and the IASB concluded a joint effort in converging the accounting for business combinations as well as the accounting and reporting for non-controlling interests culminating in the issuance of certain provision of ASC 805. The objective of that joint effort was not to reconsider the accounting for equity method investments; however, the application of the equity method is affected by the accounting for business combinations and the accounting for consolidated subsidiaries, which were affected by the issuance of certain provisions of ASC 805. The amendment is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years, ~~except for some disclosures about~~consistent with the ~~insurance enterprise’s risk-management activities.~~effective dates of certain provision of ASC 805. This ~~Statement requires~~amendment shall be applied prospectively. Earlier application by an entity that disclosures about the risk-management activities of the insurance enterprise be effective for the first period (including interim periods) beginning after issuance of this Statement. Except for those disclosures, earlier applicationhas previously adopted an alternative accounting policy is not permitted. The ~~Company does not expect the~~ adoption of ~~SFAS 163~~this amendment did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In April 2009, the FASB amended ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures”, in which, if an entity determines that the level of activity for an asset or liability has significantly decreased and that a transaction is not orderly, further analysis of transactions or quoted prices is needed, and a significant adjustment to the transaction or quoted prices may be necessary to estimate fair value in accordance with FASB ASC 820. The Company adopted this amendment and there was no material impact on the financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In May 2009, the FASB issued ASC 855, “Subsequent Events”. This Standard sets forth: 1) the period after the balance sheet date during which management of a reporting entity should evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial statements; 2) the circumstances under which an entity should recognize events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial statements; and 3) the disclosures that an entity should make about events or transactions that occurred after the balance sheet date. This Statement is effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. The Company adopted this statement and there was no impact on the financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In June 2009, the FASB issued the Update No. 2009-01-Topic 105-Generally Accepted Accounting Principles-amendments based on-Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 168-The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. The FASB Accounting Standards Codification will become the source of authoritative U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities. Rules and interpretive releases of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) under authority of federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. On the effective date of this Statement, the Codification will supersede all then-existing non-SEC accounting and reporting standards. All other non-grandfathered non-SEC accounting literature not included in the Codification will become non-authoritative. This Statement is effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. The Company has adopted and updated the accounting standards reference started in Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2009.

In August 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2009-05, “Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value” (ASU 2009-05) (codified within ASC 820 “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures”). ASU 2009-05 amends the fair value and measurement topic to provide guidance on the fair value measurement of liabilities. ASU 2009-05 is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after August 26, 2009. The adoption of the amendments to the FASB Accounting Standards Codification resulting from ASU 2009-05 did not have a material impact on ~~its~~the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

years beginning on or after June 15, 2010, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that the adoption of the amendments to the FASB Accounting Standards Codification resulting from ASU 2009-13 may have on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In October 2009, the FASB issued ASU No. 2009-13, “Multiple Deliverable Revenue Arrangements - a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force” (ASU 2009-13) (codified within ASC Topic 605 “Revenue Recognition”). ASU 2009-13 addresses the accounting for multiple-deliverable arrangements to enable vendors to account for products or services (deliverables) separately rather than as a combined unit. ASU 2009-13 is effective prospectively for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that the adoption of the amendments to the FASB Accounting Standards Codification resulting from ASU 2009-13 may have on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

5.2 ~~Summarized Income Statement~~

Selected Gross Margin Data

This discussion should be read in conjunction with the information contained in ~~the~~our audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto (the ~~‘‘Financial Statements’’~~“Financial Statements”) presented in Item 18 of this Annual Report.

Results are analyzed and reported along the lines of our three principal business segments, consisting of manufactured products, project engineering and distribution. The operating data that senior management collects and analyzes from our operating subsidiaries include, in certain cases, certain limited information regarding results along product lines within our manufactured products segment. For the benefit of our shareholders, included in the summary table below are certain results for product lines within our manufactured products segment with regard to net sales, gross profit and gross profit margin for the periods covered. The following table sets forth aselected summary ~~statement of income~~data for the periods indicated (dollar ($) amounts in thousands of US$):


	2005				2006				2007				2007			2008			2009
Net Sales:
Manufactured products:
Telecommunications wire and cable		$	32,171			$	49,069			$	46,444		$	46,444		$	46,955		$	62,004
Power cable			101,333				147,726				188,818			188,818			179,794			102,972
Enameled wire			162,483				237,097				258,470			258,470			221,099			135,145
Electronic cable			5,529				5,388				1,073			1,073			—			—

Total manufactured products			301,516				439,280				494,805			494,805			447,848			300,121
SDI project engineering			15,691				16,421				5,253			5,253			20,535			34,008
Distributed Products			20,055				12,416				10,783			10,783			32,415			28,102

Total net sales			337,262				468,117				510,841			510,841			500,798			362,231

Gross profit:
Manufactured products:
Telecommunications wire and cable			1,600				11,294				7,712			7,712			5,120			9,341
Power cable			18,465				24,890				33,916			33,916			29,369			8,602
Enameled wire			16,482				21,901				2,995			2,995			2,778			2,093
Electronic cable			146				403				48			48			—			—

Total manufactured products			36,693				58,488				44,671			44,671			37,267			20,036
SDI project engineering			(375	)			(284	)			(347	)		(347	)		(956	)		889
Distributed Products			634				1,107				80			80			1,584			1,517
Recovery (allowance) for inventory reserve			(346	)			(2,017	)			1,272			1,272			(25,145	)		23,949

Total gross profit			36,606				57,294				45,676			45,676			12,750			46,391

Gross profit margin:
Manufactured products:
Telecommunications wire and cable			5.0	%			23.0	%			16.6	%		16.6	%		10.9	%		15.1	%
Power cable			18.2	%			16.8	%			18.0	%		18.0	%		16.2	%		8.4	%
Enameled wire			10.1	%			9.2	%			1.2	%		1.2	%		1.3	%		1.5	%
Electronic cable			2.6	%			7.5	%			4.5	%		4.5	%		0.0	%		0.0	%

Total manufactured products			12.2	%			13.3	%			9.0	%		9.0	%		8.3	%		6.7	%
SDI Project engineering			(2.4	)%			(1.7	)%			(6.6	)%		(6.6	)%		(4.7	)%		2.6	%
Distributed Products			3.2	%			8.9	%			0.7	%		0.7	%		4.9	%		5.4	%

Total gross margin			10.9	%			12.2	%			8.9	%		8.9	%		2.5	%		12.8	%

Note that gross profit margin by manufactured products excludes recovery or allowance for inventory ~~reserve. Further note~~reserve, but that ~~the~~recovery or allowance for inventory reserve is included in ~~2005~~total gross margin.

5.3 Operating Results

The Company is 65.6% owned and ~~2006 has been reclassified as cost~~controlled by PEWC, a Taiwanese company. An additional 9.8% of ~~sales to conform~~the Common Shares are owned and controlled by a U.S.-based private equity fund. The remaining 24.6% of the outstanding Common Shares are publicly-traded in the United States on the OTC BB. Based upon a review of Schedule 13D and 13G filings made with the ~~current year’s presentation as management believes that this presentation better reflects the nature~~Commission by shareholders, and a review of the ~~charges. That reclassification~~share register maintained by the Company’s transfer agents in Bermuda and the U.S., the Company is ~~reflected~~not aware that it has any shareholders resident in ~~certain operating~~the jurisdictions where the Company has business operations. While the Company’s operations and results ~~including gross profits~~are impacted by economic, fiscal, monetary and ~~gross profit margins.~~

~~5.3 Operating Results~~

political policies of the respective governments in the countries where the Company operates, that impact is not a function of the shareholder base of the Company.

5.3.1 Year Ended December 31, ~~2007~~2009 Compared with Year Ended December 31, ~~2006~~

2008

General

Results of operations are determined primarily by market demand and government infrastructure projects, market selling prices of our products, our ability to manufacture high quality products efficiently in quantities sufficient to meet demand and to control production and operating costs. Our results are also influenced by a number of factors, including currency stability in the countries in which our operations are located, competition and the cost of raw materials, especially copper, which accounted for approximately ~~60% to~~ 70% of the cost of ~~sales.~~

sales in 2009.

In order to minimize the impact of copper price fluctuations, we attempt to ~~‘‘peg’’~~“peg” the prices of our products to the prevailing market price of copper and pass changes in the cost of copper through to customers as much as possible. In certain circumstances, however, we remain affected by fluctuations in the price of copper. For example, the price of telecommunications cable sold for use in public projects in Thailand is determined semi-annually and is based upon the average spot market price of copper on the LME during the six-month period commencing on January 1 and July 1 prior to the month of order. Thus, a recent rise or decline in copper prices may not be fully reflected under this pricing scheme for several months.

Average copper prices per metric ton have ~~increased~~decreased by ~~6.0%~~25.9% from ~~$6,645~~$6,956 in ~~2006~~2008 to ~~$7,041~~$5,150 in ~~2007.~~2009 (four quarters average). Gross profit margins for manufactured products in ~~2007~~2009 were on average at ~~9.0%~~12.8% compared to ~~13.3%~~2.5% in ~~2006.~~

2008.

Copper prices indicated in this report are quoted from the London ~~Metal~~Metals Exchange (LME) index. The ~~2007~~2009 and ~~2006~~2008 copper prices are as follows:

2007 2006
Average LME copper price ($/Ton) 1Q 6,452 5,103
2Q 7,476 7,198
3Q 7,649 7,602
4Q 6,588 6,675
Year 7,041 6,645


			2009		2008
Average LME copper price ($/Ton)		1Q		3,428		7,796
		2Q		4,663		8,443
		3Q		5,859		7,680
		4Q		6,648		3,905

	Year			5,150		6,956

The average copper price in April 2010 on the LME was $7,745 per ton.

According to the April 2009 East Asia and Pacific Update published by the World Bank, ~~(i)~~ the rates of year ~~2007~~2009 GDP growth for Thailand, Singapore and China were ~~4.3%~~0.3%, ~~7.7%~~-0.9%, and ~~11.4%~~8.4%, respectively, ~~and (ii)~~while the ~~2006~~rates of year 2008 GDP growth ~~rates~~ for Thailand, Singapore and China were ~~5.0%~~2.6%, ~~7.9%~~1.1% and ~~10.7%~~9.0%, respectively. Our performance is largely influenced by the level of growth in the telecommunication and power infrastructure, construction and electronic goods manufacturing sectors. We are beginning to see the return of growth in these industrial sectors following the recovery in the general economies of the respective countries and increases in governments’ expenditures on infrastructure.

Net Sales

Sales of manufactured product ~~increased~~decreased by ~~12.7%~~$147.7 million, or 33.0%, from ~~$439~~$447.8 million in ~~2006~~2008 to ~~$495~~$300.0 million in ~~2007, contributing to an overall sales increase of 9.2%.~~2009. Sales in power cable ~~exhibited the strongest increase of 27.8%~~decreased by $76.8 million in 2009, or 42.7%, due to a decrease in sales in Thailand as a result of reduced government and private construction contracts, coupled with decreases in Australia due to a much lower market price. On the contrary, in Singapore pricing increased marginally. Sales in enameled wire decreased by 38.9% to $135.1 million. In Thailand, enameled wire sales decreased by $55 million due to much less demand locally. Elsewhere enameled wire sales in CCH HK encountered a similar problem where its export business fell by $26 million during 2009. Shanghai Yayang, on the other hand, was tied up with shortage of operating funds to keep the steam going, and because of that, it did not reach its full capacity of producing at 600 tons per month. Although the Company had ample unused credit lines elsewhere in other subsidiaries, they were no use to SYE as Chinese Foreign exchange policies and bank regulations at other operating sites would prevent SYE from utilizing or borrowing additional funds within the group. Sales of telecommunication cable, on the contrary, showed signs of a strong recovery after two years of stalled business. SPFO increased sales to $36 million, a material increase from $16.6 million a year ago due to a significant demand for ~~transmission of electricity~~telecommunication infrastructure certain markets in eastern China. These are all government related projects where SPFO supplies fiber optic cables to ~~and within commercial and residential buildings, especially in Thailand. Sales of Distributed Products and revenue~~the contractors. Other markets such as Thailand still showed a sluggish business where the sales decreased by $4.3 million.

Revenue from SDI project engineering in Singapore ~~decreased~~increased in ~~2007~~2009 by $12.3 million, or 59.8% due to the build out of government sponsored casino projects. Such business will likely be concluded in May 2010 and the projected turnover in 2010 for Sigma Cable has been revised down because of the anticipated completion of those projects.

Revenue from Distributed Products suffered a setback as demand related to Singapore government-related housing projects has been delayed in part or suspended because of the financial downturn. Sales decreased ~~demand and~~by $4.3 million to $28.1 million from sales a ~~decrease in offers~~year ago of ~~tenders from SP Powerassets.~~

$32.4 million.

The following table shows the percentage share inand dollar value (in thousands) of net sales of the respective operations with respect to our total sales in ~~2007.~~

2009:


							Manufactured					All products
	Manufactured products only			All products and services			products only					and services
Thailand		50.5	%		48.8	%		39.3	%	$	117,954		32.9	%	$	119,225
Singapore		6.3	%		9.4	%		11.5	%	$	34,583		26.2	%	$	94,782
Australia		11.3	%		10.9	%		11.3	%	$	33,935		9.6	%	$	34,574
China		31.9	%		30.9	%		37.9	%	$	113,649		31.4	%	$	113,650

Total		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%	$	300,121		100.0	%	$	362,231

Gross Profit

Gross profit for ~~2007~~2009 was ~~$45.7~~$46.4 million, representing ~~a decrease~~an increase of ~~20.2%~~$33.6 million, or 362.5% compared to ~~$57.3~~$12.8 million for ~~2006.~~2008. The ~~decrease~~increase was primarily attributable to ~~increases~~the recovery of allowance for inventory reserve provided for in 2008 of $25.1 million due to the significant fall in copper prices towards the end of 2008. LME copper prices increased from an average of $3,428 per metric ton in the ~~prices~~first quarter of ~~raw materials~~2009 to $6,648 per metric ton in the ~~global market while~~fourth quarter of 2009, representing an increase of 93.9%. The upward adjustment of copper prices was in line with the ~~sales~~general increase over the course of 2009 in commodity prices.

Aside from recovery of copper price ~~of finished products to certain customers remained fixed or could not be increased significantly due to competitive market prices in the industry. Gross~~

adjustment, gross profit contributed by sales of manufactured products was ~~$44.7~~$20.0 million in ~~2007~~2009 compared to ~~$58.5~~$37.3 million in ~~2006, representing~~ 2008,a decrease of ~~23.6%~~46.4%. The decrease in gross profit from sale of manufactured products is due to the lower sales volume for power cable and enameled

cable across the various markets in which the Company operates. The relative contribution to gross profit from manufactured products for 2008 and 2009 is as follows:


	2008			2009
Manufactured Products:
Telecommunication cable		13.7	%		46.62	%
Power cable		78.8	%		42.93	%
Enameled wire		7.5	%		10.45	%
Electronic cable		—			—

Total		100.0	%		100.0	%

The contribution to gross profit from each segment line for 2008 and 2009 is as follows:


	2008			2009
Manufactured Products:
Telecommunication cable		40.2	%		20.1	%
Power cable		230.3	%		18.6	%
Enameled wire		21.8	%		4.5	%
Electronic cable		0.0	%		0.0	%

Total		292.3	%		43.2	%

SDI Project Engineering Services		(7.5	)%		1.9	%
Distributed Products		12.4	%		3.3	%

Recovery (allowance) for inventory reserve		(197.2	)%		51.6	%
			��
Total		100.0	%		100.0	%

Overall gross profit margins ~~decreased~~increased from ~~12.2%~~2.5% in ~~2006~~2008 to ~~8.9%~~12.8% in ~~2007.~~2009. Gross profit margins for manufactured products decreased slightly from ~~13.3%~~8.3% in ~~2006~~2008 to ~~9.0%~~6.7% in ~~2007. The decrease~~2009. Increased margins for telecommunication cables, was ~~primarily~~offset largely by decreases in margins for power and enameled cables. Gross profit margin for power cable in Singapore increased by 0.43% due to ~~decreased margins~~slightly elevated sales prices in that market. CCH HK and PEWS, however, experienced an increase in enameled wire ~~products resulting from weaker market conditions and increased competition in both China and Thailand. To~~gross margin by a ~~lesser extent, the decrease was~~significant 2.43% , due to ~~decreased margins in telecommunications cable in Thailand.~~tightened inventory and shop floor control. Gross profit margins for ~~power~~telecommunications cables increased ~~particularly~~ in ~~Australia~~both Shangdong and in Thailand’s Siam Fiber Optics, (SFO), due largely to the ~~strong Australian economy and the Company’s focus on products with higher gross margins.~~

~~Operating Profit~~

~~Selling, general and administrative expenses~~significant incremental demand for telecommunication cables as government’s attention to building up telecom infrastructure intensified. SPFO in Shangdong increased by ~~$1.8 million or 6.7%~~1.24% while SFO experienced another 4.49% increase in ~~2007, primarily due~~gross profits, although the sales dropped by $4.3 million.

Operating Profit

In addition to ~~the higher provisions for doubtful accounts. Higher provisions~~estimating an allowance for doubtful accounts ~~largely arose~~based on historical sales and collection data, we perform a detailed review of our outstanding receivables, and make adjustments to our estimate to reflect significant delinquent accounts receivable. The Company is not aware of any significant delinquent accounts receivable that have not already been adequately reserved. In addition, our periodic allowance for doubtful accounts will continue to not have a material impact on our liquidity.

Other than allowance for bad debt, overall SG&A expenses decreased by $0.3 million, or 1.1%, which is attributable to management’s efforts in cutting expenses and tightening control on non-production related expenditures. The headcount number went down by 90 people from ~~increased specific and general provisions~~a year ago. Bad debt allowance recovered (reduced) by $0.9 million including a reversal of $0.3 million by our Australian operations which were over-accrued in the ~~Company’s Thai subsidiaries. Increased specific provisions were largely attributed to~~past, and Signvale Pte. Ltd., a ~~debtor, a major telecommunication subcontractor~~ company ~~that encountered delayed payments~~organized under APWC General Holdings, reversed its ~~contract with the Thai government.~~

~~Exchange Gain/Loss~~

~~In July 1997, the flotation~~accrual of ~~the Thai Baht caused the currency to fall in value against the U.S. dollar and triggered declines in other regional currencies, such~~$0.6 million as the ~~Singapore dollar and Australian dollar. The Thai Baht generally appreciated against the U.S. dollar during the course~~debt is to be transferred into Sigma Epan International as capital contribution.

Accounts receivable, net of ~~1998 and largely stabilized in 1999. However,~~allowance for doubtful accounts, increased by $5.8 million from mid-2000, the Thai economy began to decelerate as a result of weak domestic demand, coupled with a major fiscal expansion program espoused by the newly elected government, which contributed to a weakening of the Thai Baht. In the past several years, the global weakening of the U.S. dollar against many other currencies has resulted in a strengthening of the Baht against the U.S. dollar. The exchange differences in the income statements arose largely as a result of these movements in the Thai Baht exchange rate and, to a lesser extent, the movements in the other operating currencies.

~~The exchange rates~~$96 million as of December 31, ~~2007 and~~2008 to $101.8 million as of December 31, ~~2006,~~2009. The increase was attributable principally

to the fact that during the financial downturn, more and more customers are facing cash and liquidity issues. Days of sales outstanding were 70 days for 2008 and 99 days for 2009.

Exchange Gain/Loss

The exchange rates at end of December 31, 2009 and 2008 are listed below, based on the Noon Buying ~~Rate, were as follows:~~

Rate. However, they do not actually reflect the ongoing rates during the year when transactions actually took place.


					December 31,		December 31,
	December 31, 2007		December 31, 2006		2009		2008
Foreign currency to US$1:
Thai Baht		29.50		36.10		33.33		34.72
Singapore $		1.44		1.53		1.40		1.44
Australian $		1.14		1.27		1.11		1.41
Chinese Rmb		7.30		7.80
Chinese RMB						6.83		6.82

Based on the above rates, the revaluation of assets and liabilities denominated in U.S. dollars or other foreign currencies in the Company resulted in ~~$0.9 million exchange gain in 2007. The exchange gain in 2007 is less than that of 2006 due to the fluctuations in exchange rates~~unrealized and ~~higher~~ realized ~~exchange gains in our Thai operations in 2006 arising from the settlement of receivables and payables denominated in U.S. dollars or other foreign currencies during that period.~~

We use Thai Baht forward foreign exchange contracts to reduce our exposure to foreign currency risks for liabilities denominated in foreign currencies. A forward foreign exchange contract obligates us and our subsidiaries to exchange predetermined amounts of specified foreign exchange currencies at specified exchange rates or to make an equivalent U.S. dollar payment equal to the value of such exchange. Realized and unrealized gains and losses on forward foreign exchange contracts are included in operations as foreign exchange gains ~~or losses.~~

~~Gain/Loss from Investees~~

~~In 2007, gains from investees were largely related to Shandong Pacific Rubber Cable Co., Ltd (‘‘SPRC’’).~~

~~Impairment~~ of ~~Investments~~

~~In 2007, the Company recorded an impairment of $0.1~~$0.6 million in ~~SHP due to an oversupply of products in the market at Shandong and the suspension of construction~~2009. The exchange gains were realized across various of the ~~SHP production line.~~

operating companies, where each contributed some gain.

Gain on Sale of Investment

The gain on sale of investment in ~~2007~~2009 was primarily attributable to ~~the sale~~a disposal of ~~warrants~~long-aged accounts payable held by ~~a subsidiary~~Sigma Epan. The individual companies that have gone into liquidation process and the associated accounts payable amounts were: Epan (Thailand) Company of $0.3 million, Sigma-Epan Cable of $0.3 million, and Data Testing Lab of $7,700.

Other Income

Other income in ~~Singapore.~~

~~Other Income~~

~~Other income~~2009 increased by $1.1 million, compared with 2008, to $4.9 million. The increase in 2009 largely consists of much less interest expenses paid as the loans were reduced, gains on Forex rose to $0.5 million, as opposed to a Forex loss a year ago by $1.7 million. Gains on sales of ~~raw materials and~~copper scraps and ~~gains on disposal~~increases in tax refund for reinvestment and reversal of ~~fixed assets. The increase~~accounts payable in ~~other income in 2007 is primarily due to gains on disposal of fixed assets of NPC, Charoong Thai, and PEWS.~~

China also contributed.

Income Taxes

~~Our~~

In 2009 the overall effective tax rate ~~increased from 31.5% in 2006~~for the group was at 27.3%. In 2008, the Company recorded income tax of $2.1 million despite recording a consolidated loss of $20.1 million due primarily to ~~47.9% in 2007, primarily due to origination and reversal of temporary differences in CTW and the effect of the adoption of ‘‘Interpretation No. 48, Accounting~~income tax recorded for ~~Uncertainty in Income Taxes – An Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109.’’~~

profitable subsidiaries such as APEC.

The Company files income taxes in each jurisdiction where such a filing is required based on its revenues. The provision for income taxes differs based on the taxes incurred by the operating subsidiaries in their respective jurisdictions. Effective tax rates differ from the statutory rate due to, among other things, whether certain expenses are deductible or not deductible for tax purposes and changes in valuation allowances.

As of December 31, ~~2007,~~2009, the Company’s operating subsidiaries in China had net operating loss (“NOL”) carry forwards of approximately $6$19.4 million which expire on various dates between ~~2008~~2010 and ~~2011.~~2014. Based on their history of losses, management believes it is likely that the net operating loss carry forwards will not be fully utilized by those subsidiaries, ~~before expiration. Accordingly,~~accordingly, the Company has not recognized the ~~$6 million~~NOL carry-forwards as deferred tax assets.

A significant portion of the deferred tax assets recognized by the Company relates to net operating loss carry forwards of APEC of $1.4 million and reserves not yet deductible for tax purposes. Because the Company operates in multiple jurisdictions, it considers the need for a valuation allowance on a country-by-country basis, taking into account the effect of local tax laws. ~~Where a valuation allowance was not recorded, the Company believes that there was sufficient evidence to support its conclusion not to record it.~~ Management believes, but cannot assure, that the Company will utilize the APEC loss ~~carry forwards~~carry-forwards in the future due to APEC’s profitability and continued generation of taxable income.

Reserves not yet deductible for tax purposes affect temporary differences. Tax consequences of most events recognized in the financial statements for a year are included in determining income taxes currently payable. However, tax laws often differ from the recognition and measurement requirements of financial accounting standards. These differences are referred to as ~~‘‘temporary~~“temporary differences.’’” Temporary differences ordinarily become taxable or deductible when the related asset is recovered or the related liability is settled. The major temporary differences that gave rise to deferred tax assets and liabilities in 2008 and 2009 were allowance for inventories, allowance for doubtful accounts and the allowance for impairment in ~~investments.~~

investment.

Additional details regarding tax laws and income taxes of the Company including deferred tax liabilities and assets in ~~2006~~2008 and ~~2007~~2009 are disclosed in Note 1210 of Item 18: ~~‘‘Financial~~“Financial Statements.’’

”

5.3.2 Year Ended December 31, ~~2006~~2008 Compared with Year Ended December 31, ~~2005~~

2007

General

Results of operations are determined primarily by market demand and government infrastructure projects, market selling prices of our products, our ability to manufacture high quality products

efficiently in quantities sufficient to meet demand and to control production and operating costs. Our results are also influenced by a number of factors, including currency stability in the countries in which our operations are located, competition and the cost of raw materials, especially copper, which accounted for approximately ~~60% to~~ 70% of the cost of ~~sales.~~

sales in 2008.

Average copper prices per metric ton ~~increased~~decreased by ~~73.3%~~2.3% from ~~$3,835~~$7,119 in ~~2005~~2007 to ~~$6,645~~$6,956 in 2006. The higher cost of copper has contributed to a higher selling price of our products in 2006 and has contributed to sales increase of $131 million in 2006, representing an increase of 38.8% over sales in 2005.2008. Gross profit margins for manufactured products in ~~2006~~2008 were on average at ~~13.3%~~2.3% compared to ~~12.2%~~9.0% in ~~2005.~~

2007.

Copper prices indicated in this report are quoted from the London Metal Exchange (LME) index. The ~~2006, 2005 and 2004~~average copper prices in 2008 and 2007 for each of the following periods are as follows:

2006 2005
Average LME copper price ($/Ton) 1Q $ 5,103 $ 3,380
2Q 7,198 3,524
3Q 7,602 3,858
4Q 6,675 4,577
Year 6,645 3,835


			2008		2007
Average LME copper price ($/Ton)		1Q		7,796		5,933
		2Q		8,443		7,642
		3Q		7,680		7,712
		4Q		3,905		7,188

	Year			6,956		7,119

According to the April 2009 East Asia and Pacific Update published by the World Bank, (i) the rates of year ~~2006~~2008 GDP growth for Thailand, Singapore and China were ~~5.0%~~2.6%, ~~7.9%~~1.1% and ~~10.7%,~~9.0% respectively and (ii) the ~~2005~~2007 GDP growth rates for Thailand, Singapore and China were ~~4.5%~~4.9%, ~~6.6%~~7.8% and ~~10.2%,~~13.0% respectively. Our

performance is largely influenced by the level of growth in the telecommunication and power infrastructure, construction and electronic goods manufacturing sectors. ~~We continue to see growth in these industrial sectors following the sustained growth in the general economies of the respective countries and strong governments’ expenditures on infrastructure.~~

The Company showed net profit of $13.0 million in 2006, compared to net losses of $5.0 million in 2005 due largely to increases in sales, gross profit margins and exchange gains, and lower impairment of investments. Overall net sales increased by 38.8% due to a copper price increase and higher demand for our products due to sterling economic growth in the region. Revenue from manufactured products increased by 45.8% but was offset by a decrease in SDI project engineering and Distributed Products by 19.3% in 2006 compared to 2005. Overall gross profit margins increased from 10.9% in 2005 to 12.2% in 2006, mainly due to an increase in the profit margin in telecommunication wire and cable products. Selling, general and administrative expenses have increased by 4.0%, mainly due to increases in the provision for doubtful accounts and inventory, and professional fees.

Our net results in 2006 were aided by positive contributions from the provisions for exchange gain and gain on liquidation of subsidiary, with an offset by a lower impairment of investment. An exchange gain of $5.5 million was recorded in 2006 largely due to the appreciation of the Thai Baht.

Net Sales

Sales of manufactured product ~~increased~~decreased by ~~45.8%~~$47 million, or 9.5%, from ~~$301~~$495 million in ~~2005~~2007 to ~~$439~~$448 million in ~~2006,~~2008, contributing to an overall sales decrease of $10 million, or 1.9%. Sales in power cable decreased by $9.0 million, or 4.8%, due to a decrease in sales in Thailand as a result of reduced government and private construction contracts, offset by an increase ~~of 38.8%.~~in sales in Singapore and Australia. Sales in enameled wire ~~exhibited the strongest increase of 46.0%~~decreased by $37.4 million, or 14.4%, due to the ~~strong~~worldwide demand ~~from appliance manufacturers especially in China and higher selling prices reflecting the rise~~ of ~~copper prices as a percentage of overall sales.~~electronic manufactured products. Sales of ~~Distributed Products and revenue~~telecommunication cable showed a marginal decrease of $9.0 million, or 4.8%, due to decreased sales in Thailand, offset by higher sales in Shandong, China. Revenue from SDI project engineering in Singapore ~~decreased~~and sales of Distributed Products increased in ~~2006~~2008 by $15.3 million, or 290.9%, and $21.6 million, or 200.6%, respectively, due primarily to ~~decreased demand~~increases in awarded tenders and ~~a decrease in offers of tenders~~purchases from SP ~~Powerassets.~~

Powerassets in Singapore.

The following table shows the percentage share inand dollar value (in thousands) of net sales of the respective operations with respect to our total sales in ~~2006.~~

2008:


							Manufactured					All products
							products only					and services
	Manufactured products only			All products and services
Thailand		48.3	%		45.3	%		48.3	%	$	216,364		43.2	%	$	216,364
Singapore		6.7	%		12.5	%		7.9	%	$	35,318		17.3	%	$	86,625
Australia		11.2	%		10.5	%		13.7	%	$	61,167		12.5	%	$	62,810
China		33.8	%		31.7	%		30.1	%	$	134,999		27.0	%	$	134,999

Total		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%	$	447,848		100.0	%	$	500,798

Gross Profit

Gross profit for ~~2006~~2008 was ~~$57.3~~$12.8 million, representing ~~an increase~~a decrease of ~~56.5%~~$32.9 million, or 72.0%, compared to ~~$36.6~~$45.7 million for ~~2005~~2007. The decrease was primarily attributable to the allowance for inventory reserve provided for in 2008 of $25.1 million due to the significant fall in copper prices towards the end of 2008. LME copper prices fell from an average of $7,680 per metric ton in the third quarter of 2008 to $3,905 per metric ton in the fourth quarter of 2008, representing a decrease of 50.8%. The fall in copper prices was in line with ~~increased sales and increased gross profit margins.~~the fall in commodity prices, including oil prices, worldwide.

Gross profit contributed by sales of manufactured products was ~~$58.5~~$37.3 million in ~~2006~~2008 compared to ~~$36.7~~$44.7 million in ~~2005.~~2007, representing a decrease of 16.6%. The decrease in gross profit from sale of manufactured products attributable primarily to the lower sales quantum and lower gross profit margins for telecommunication wire and cables and power cables. The relative contribution to gross profit from manufactured products for 2007 and 2008 is as follows:


	2007			2008
Manufactured Products:
Telecommunication cable		17.3	%		13.7	%
Power cable		75.9	%		78.8	%
Enameled wire		6.7	%		7.5	%
Electronic cable		0.1	%		0.0	%

Total		100.0	%		100.0	%

The contribution to gross profit from each segment line for 2007 and 2008 is as follows:


	2007			2008
Manufactured Products:
Telecommunication cable		16.9	%		40.2	%
Power cable		74.2	%		230.3	%
Enameled wire		6.6	%		21.8	%
Electronic cable		0.1	%		0.0	%

Total		97.8	%		292.3	%

SDI Project Engineering Services		(0.8	)%		(7.5	)%
Distributed Products		0.2	%		12.4	%

Recovery (allowance) for inventory reserve		2.8	%		(197.2	)%

Total		100.0	%		100.0	%

Overall gross profit margins ~~increased~~decreased from ~~10.9%~~8.9% in ~~2005~~2007 to ~~12.2%~~2.5% in ~~2006~~2008. Gross profit margins for manufactured products decreased slightly from 9.0% in 2007 to 8.3% in 2008 due to increased ~~margin~~margins for enameled wire, offset by decreases in margins for telecommunication ~~wire~~ and ~~cable products.~~power cables. Gross profit margin ~~for manufactured~~of enameled wire products increased from ~~12.2%~~1.2% in ~~2005~~2007 to ~~13.3%~~1.3% in ~~2006~~2008 due to better profit margins in Thailand, offset by lower profit margins in Shenzhen, China. Gross profit margins of telecommunications cable decreased from 16.6% in 2007 to 10.9% in 2008 due to lower profit margins in Thailand, offset by higher ~~contribution~~profit margins in Shandong, China. Gross profit margins for power cables decreased from ~~telecommunication wire and cable.~~

18.0% in 2007 to 16.2% in 2008.

Operating Profit

Selling, general and administrative expenses ~~increased~~decreased by ~~$1.1~~$0.4 million, or ~~4.1%~~1.4%, in ~~2006,~~2008, due to ~~higher provisions~~lower levels of allowance for doubtful accounts in 2008, offset by higher operating expenses incurred in Australia and ~~inventory, and professional fees. Higher provisions~~Shandong, China.

In addition to estimating an allowance for doubtful accounts based on historical sales and ~~inventory were in line with the increased accounts~~collection data, we perform a detailed review of our outstanding receivables, and ~~inventory resulting~~make adjustments to our estimate to reflect significant delinquent accounts receivable. We are not aware of any significant delinquent accounts receivable that have not already been adequately reserved. In addition, our periodic allowance for doubtful accounts will continue to not have a significant impact on our liquidity.

Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts, decreased by $50 million from ~~increased sales.~~

$146 million as of December 31, 2007 to $96 million as of December 31, 2008. The decrease was attributable to lower sales recorded in the last quarter of 2008 and continued efforts by the Company to monitor and collect outstanding debts. Days sales outstanding were 104 days for 2007 and 70 days for 2008.

Exchange Gain/Loss

In ~~July 1997, the flotation of the Thai Baht caused the currency to fall in value against~~2008, the U.S. dollar ~~and triggered declines in other regional currencies, such as the Singapore dollar and Australian dollar. The Thai Baht~~ generally ~~appreciated~~strengthened against the U.S. dollar during the course of 1998 and largely stabilized in 1999. However, from mid-2000, the Thai economy began to decelerate as a result of weak domestic demand, coupled with a major fiscal expansion program espoused by the newly elected government, which contributed to a weakeningAsian currencies of the ~~Thai Baht. In the past several years, the global weakening of the U.S. dollar against many other currencies has resulted~~countries in ~~a strengthening of the Baht against the U.S. dollar.~~which we operate when compared to 2007. The exchange differences in the income statements arose largely as a result

of ~~these movements~~movement in the Thai Baht exchange rate and, to a lesser extent, the movements in the other operating currencies.

The exchange rates as of December~~& nbsp;~~31, ~~2006~~2007 and ~~December 31, 2005,~~2008, based on the Noon Buying Rate, were as follows:


					December 31,		December 31,
	December 31, 2006		December 31, 2005		2008		2007
Foreign currency to US$1:
Thai Baht		36.10		40.99		34.72		29.50
Singapore $		1.53		1.66		1.44		1.44
Australian $		1.27		1.36		1.43		1.14
Chinese Rmb		7.80		8.07
Chinese RMB						6.82		7.30

Based on the above rates, the revaluation of assets and liabilities denominated in U.S. dollars or other foreign currencies in the Company resulted in ~~$5.5~~a $1.7 million exchange ~~gain~~loss in ~~2006.~~

~~We use~~2008. The exchange loss in 2008 was largely attributable to the exchange loss recorded in our Thai ~~Baht forward foreign~~subsidiaries arising from realized and unrealized exchange ~~contracts to reduce our exposure to foreign currency risks for~~losses resulting from the translation of assets and liabilities denominated in U.S. dollars or other foreign ~~currencies. A forward foreign exchange contract obligates us and our subsidiaries to exchange predetermined amounts of specified foreign exchange~~ currencies ~~at specified exchange rates or to make an equivalent U.S. dollar payment equal to the value of such~~

during that period.

~~exchange. Realized and unrealized gains and losses on forward foreign exchange contracts are included in operations as foreign exchange gains or losses.~~

Gain/Loss from Investees

In ~~2005, as in 2006, the share of gain in equity~~2008, losses from investees ~~was~~were largely related to ~~a share of operating profits of~~ Shandong Pacific Rubber Cable Co., Ltd ~~(‘‘SPRC’’~~(“SPRC”).

Impairment of ~~Investment~~

Investments

In ~~2005,~~2007, the ~~impairment of investment consisted of~~Company recorded an impairment of ~~$3.0 million in Loxley Pacific Co., Ltd. (‘‘LoxPac’’) due to limited business prospects of its investments, and an impairment of $0.2~~$0.1 million in SHP due to an oversupply of products in the market at Shandong and ~~temporary~~the suspension of construction of the SHP production line.

~~Loss~~ There was no impairment of investments recorded in 2008.

Gain on Sale of Investment

The gain on sale of investment in 2007 was primarily attributable to a $35,000 realized gain on sale by Sigma Cable Company (Private) Limited (“Sigma Cable”) of 80,000 shares of Hong Fok Corporation Ltd., a public company listed on the Singapore Exchange (SGX). The Company accounted for this investment in accordance with SFAS 115 — “Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities.” The investment was classified as “held for sale” and the Company recognized approximately $13,000 of unrealized gain in shareholders’ equity and other comprehensive income prior to the sale of the securities. There was no gain or loss on sale of investment recorded in ~~2005~~2008.

Other Income

Other income largely consists of gains on sales of raw materials and ~~2006 was largely~~scraps, a tax refund for re-investment in China, a reversal of accounts payable and gains on disposal of fixed assets. The increase in other income in 2008 is primarily due to ~~the~~increases in tax refund for reinvestment and reversal of accounts payable in China, offset by lower gain of disposal of fixed assets in 2008.

Income Taxes

Our effective tax rate was at 47.9% in 2007. In 2008, the Company recorded income tax of $2.1 million despite recording a consolidated loss of $20.1 million due primarily to income tax recorded for profitable subsidiaries such as APEC.

As of December 31, 2008, the Company’s operating subsidiaries in China had net operating loss carry forwards of approximately $6 million which expired or will expire on various dates between 2008 and 2011. Based on their history of losses, management believes it is likely that the net operating loss carry forwards will not be fully utilized by those subsidiaries before expiration. Accordingly, the Company has not recognized the $6 million as deferred tax assets.

A significant portion of ~~our investment~~the deferred tax assets recognized by the Company relates to net operating loss carry forwards of APEC and reserves not yet deductible for tax purposes. Because the Company operates in ~~Charoong Thai.~~

~~Gain~~multiple jurisdictions, it considers the need for a valuation allowance on ~~Liquidation~~a country-by-country basis, taking into account the effect of ~~Subsidiary~~

~~In 2006,~~local tax laws. Where a valuation allowance was not recorded, the ~~gain on liquidation~~Company believes that there was sufficient evidence to support its conclusion not to record it. Management believes, but cannot assure, that the Company will utilize the APEC loss carry-forwards in the future due to APEC’s profitability and continued generation of ~~subsidiary~~taxable income.

Reserves not yet deductible for tax purposes affect temporary differences. Tax consequences of ~~$1.8 million resulted~~most events recognized in the financial statements for a year are included in determining income taxes currently payable. However, tax laws often differ from the ~~liquidation~~recognition and measurement requirements of ~~CTW (Hong Kong) Limited.~~

~~Income Taxes~~

~~In 2006, our overall income~~financial accounting standards. These differences are referred to as “temporary differences.” Temporary differences ordinarily become taxable or deductible when the related asset is recovered or the related liability is settled. The major temporary differences that gave rise to deferred tax ~~charge has increased~~assets and liabilities in ~~line with~~2007 and 2008 were allowance for inventories, allowance for doubtful accounts and the ~~increased chargeable income with an overall tax rate on chargeable income at 31.5%.~~

allowance for impairment in investment.

Additional details regarding tax laws and income taxes of the Company including deferred tax liabilities and assets in ~~2005~~2007 and ~~2006~~2008 are disclosed in Note 12 of Item 18: ~~‘‘Financial~~“Financial Statements.’’

”

5.4 Liquidity and Capital Resources
~~Capital Expenditure and Capital Resources~~
~~The following are major investments and purchases made in 2006 and 2007:~~

~~In 2003, the Company injected $1.7~~

As of December 31, 2009 we had $41.5 million in ~~Shanghai Yayang through its subsidiary, Pacific Thai, thereby increasing~~cash and cash equivalents, primarily in money market accounts, and none of which was unrestricted short-term bank deposits. Our current sources of cash are our cash on hand, cash generated by our operations and our credit facilities. Our primary financing need will continue to be to fund the ~~Company’s interest~~growth in ~~Shanghai Yayang from 62.39% to 63.49%. In 2004 and 2006,~~our operations, the Company, through its subsidiary, Charoong Thai, made additional capital contributions of $0.5 million and $1 million, respectively, to Shanghai Yayang. The additional investment was in view of improved sales and operating performance and the need for capacity expansion as part of the Company’s operational strategy. Each of the Company and its joint venture partner, Shandong Yanggu, have injected $0.3 million of capital into Shangdong Pacific Fiber Optics Cable Co., Ltd. (‘‘SPFO’’). To date, the Company has invested a total of $2.8 million representing a 51.0% interest in SPFO. The Company has also contributed $0.2 million to Shandong Huayu Pacific Fiber Optics Communication Co., Ltd. (‘&ls quo;SHP’’).

~~Total purchases~~purchase of property, plant and equipment ~~amounted~~and future acquisitions.

We have no direct business operations other than our ownership of the capital stock of our subsidiaries and joint venture holdings. Consequently, our subsidiaries have been and will continue to ~~$5.2 million in 2006 and $2.6 million in 2007. Those purchases related mainly~~be the primary source of funds generated by operations. Corporate needs are funded primarily through distributions from our subsidiaries. Although we have no current intention to ~~the capacity expansion~~pay dividends, we would rely upon distributions of ~~certain~~dividends from our subsidiaries in ~~Thailand~~order to do so. As noted in our risk factors, our operating subsidiaries and ~~China, particularly Charoong Thai,~~other holdings and investments, from time to time, may be subject to restrictions on their ability to make distributions to us. Such restrictions could result from restrictive covenants contained in our loan agreements, restrictions on the ~~replacement~~conversion of ~~old equipment.~~local currency earnings into U.S. dollars or other hard currency and other regulatory restrictions. For example, PRC legal restrictions permit payments of dividends by our business entities in the PRC only out of their retained earnings, if any, determined in accordance with relevant PRC accounting standards and regulations. Under PRC law, such entities are also required to set aside a portion of their net income each year to fund certain reserve funds. These reserves are not distributable as cash dividends. The foregoing restrictions may also affect our ability to fund operations of one subsidiary with dividends and other payments received from another subsidiary. We are not aware of any other restrictions in other countries in which we do business other than those discussed in the “Risk Factors” section. Distributions may also be restricted as the result of objections by minority shareholders of our subsidiaries and current cash

~~Liquidity~~

requirements by the operating subsidiaries. Consequently, we periodically need to manage our corporate cash needs with the timing of distributions.

We met our working capital requirements from cash provided by operations and both short-term and long-term borrowings. Net cash generated from operating activities was $1.9 million in 2007 compared to $42.9 million of net cash used for operating activities in 2006. Net cash used for investing activities in 2007 was $4.0 million compared to $3.3 million generated in 2006. Net cash generated from financing activities amounted to $4.0 million in 2007 compared to $41.8 million in 2006, which was largely due to an increase in bank loans in 2006.

~~The Company maintains~~maintain several working capital and overdraft credit facilities with various commercial bank groups and financial institutions. Under our line of credit arrangements for short-term

debt with ~~the Company’s bankers, the Company~~our banks, we may borrow up to approximately ~~$252~~$279.8 million, including letters of credit for commodity purchases, on such terms as ~~the Company~~we and the banks ~~may~~ mutually agree upon. These arrangements do not have termination dates but are reviewed annually for renewal. As of December 31, ~~2007,~~2009, the unused portion of the credit lines was approximately ~~$134~~$211.2 million. That total borrowing amount includes $172.1 million ~~which included unused~~in amounts available for trust receipts and issuances of letters of credit, ~~amounting to $98 million.~~of which $141.2 million was unused and available as of December 31, 2009. Letters of credit are issued ~~for the account of the Company during~~on our behalf in the ordinary course of business by ~~major financial institutions~~our banks as required by certain ~~vendor~~supplier contracts. As of December 31, ~~2007,~~2009, the Company had open letters of credit totaling ~~$81~~$30.8 million. Liabilities relating to the letters of credit are included in current liabilities.

~~Our main source~~ There is no seasonality to the company’s borrowing, nor is there any restriction on the use of ~~liquidity~~such borrowing.

Net cash generated from operating activities in the ~~near future~~fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 was $18.4 million, as compared to $60 million of net cash generated from operating activities in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008. Our net cash from operations continues to be impacted significantly by our sales and raw material purchases, which have a direct impact on changes in our accounts receivable, inventories and accounts payable. Days sales outstanding (DSO) is a measure of the average collection period of accounts receivable, and although the calculation is influenced by the period used and the timing of sales within that period, it can provide insight into the variances in collections from period to period. Our days of sales outstanding as December 31, 2009 were 99 days, as compared to 70 days as of December 31, 2008. The deterioration in DSOs as of December 31, 2009 is due to the continued impact of the global economic recession on the businesses of our customers. Also contributing to the net cash provided by operations in 2009 was a $30.1 million decrease in our inventories, as compared to 2008. The decrease was a result of management’s efforts to reduce inventory levels in anticipation of lower sales as a result of weakening market conditions. Our accounts payable, accrued expenses, and other liabilities increased by $8.8 million in 2009 which was attributable to lower annual sales volume and demands of suppliers for quicker cash payment in light of the risks associated with the financial crisis.

We increased our liabilities to related parties by $3.0 million in 2009 as compared to the $4.3 million reduction of liabilities to related parties in 2008, mainly due to purchases of power cables and raw materials and settlements thereof.

Net cash provided by investing activities was a positive $8.0 million in 2009, as compared to approximately $5.1 million used in 2008. Investing activities are comprised primarily of the purchases of property, plant and equipment, as well as changes in our restricted and unrestricted short-term deposits. As our major capital expenditures were made in 2008, hence the diminished need for capital expenditures in 2009. The net result is an increase in investing cash.

Included in investment activity are changes to our restricted short-term bank deposits. Restricted short-term deposits represent amounts pledged by our subsidiaries to secure various credit facilities, examples of which include performance bonds, banker’s acceptances, letters of credit and revolving lines of credit. In general, the balance in restricted short-term deposits changes in the normal course of business and as the result of specific liquidity requirements of the operating subsidiaries. The funds on deposit are maintained in money market accounts and have earned interest in 2009 at annual rates ranging from 1% to 1.5%. The decrease in restricted short-term deposits of $1.9 million in 2009, down from 2008 at $15.0 million, was a sign that our bank borrowing was getting less. We also maintain unrestricted short-term bank deposits in the form of fixed bank deposits where surplus cash was deposited for the purpose of earning interest. These fixed deposits earned interest at annual rates ranging from to 1% to 1.5% with maturities of less than a year. Unrestricted short-term deposits decreased by $7.8 million to zero dollars, which means more cash was freed up and at the Company’s disposal. Net cash used in financing activities decreased by $22.7 million in 2009, to $21.7 million, as compared to $44.5 million used in financing activities in 2008. Our financing activities are primarily comprised of borrowings from and repayments on our credit facilities with our banks. Our bank loans were reduced by $20.8 million. During the financial crisis in 2009, these loans were reduced as spending on copper and manufacturing supplies were reduced.

We engage in transactions in the ordinary course of business with PEWC, including the purchase of certain raw materials and the distribution of PEWC products in various countries in the Asia Pacific region. The Composite Services Agreement contains provisions that define our relationship and the conduct of our respective businesses and confers certain preferential benefits on us. Under the Composite Services Agreement, the material terms of which are summarized in the “Material Contracts” section, there are no obligations binding on the Company in favor of PEWC, nor are there any pre-established purchase commitments for copper. As such, the Composite Service Agreement should not impact cash flows or liquidity until such time as actual purchases are made in the ordinary course of business such as for the purchase of raw materials. The Composite Service Agreement may, however, impact operations to the extent that PEWC is not able to fulfill its obligations, such as supplying copper, and copper is not otherwise readily available on comparable terms from other market sources. Cash generated by operations and borrowings, when needed, from our credit facilities have been the primary sources of funding purchases under the Composite Service Agreement, and we believe these sources will continue to provide sufficient funds for future purchases under this agreement.

To date, the Company has invested an aggregate of $2.8 million in Shangdong Pacific Fiber Optics Cable Co., Ltd. (“SPFO”), in which the Company possesses a 51.0% shareholders’ interest. The Company’s joint venture partner, Shandong Yanggu, possesses the remaining 49% shareholders’ interest in SPFO. Investments in SPFO have been directed at capacity expansion and the joint venture has shown increased sales and improved results for the first time in 2009. The Company has also contributed $0.2 million to Shandong Huayu Pacific Fiber Optics Communication Co., Ltd. (“SHP”).

We believe funds generated by our operating ~~activities.~~activities, our cash on hand and amounts available to us under our credit facilities will provide adequate cash to fund our requirements through at least the next twelve months. We continue to have sufficient liquidity to meet our anticipated working capital, capital expenditures, general corporate requirements, and other short-term and long-term obligations as they come due. We may further enhance our liquidity in the future, as needs arise, by establishing additional lines of credit, with the support of one or more of our principal shareholders if necessary and available.

We currently anticipate that we will retain all of our earnings to fund our operations and do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future.

5.5 Research and Development

The ~~following table sets forth our obligations~~Company does not currently engage in its own research and development. Under the Composite Services Agreement with PEWC described herein, the Company benefits from research and development conducted by PEWC at little or no cost to the Company. Accordingly, the Company has not made material expenditures on or commitments to ~~make future payments under contracts~~research and ~~other commitments.~~

development since formation.

Payments due by period
Contractual obligations as of December 31, 2007
(In thousands of US$) Total 2008 2009-2010 2011-2012 After 2012
Long term debt — — — — —
Long term loan from PEWC 240 240 — — —
Capital lease obligations (principal amount only) 326 146 180 — —
Operating leases 3,441 425 293 272 2,451
Purchase obligations for copper cathodes 71,147 71,147 — — —
Total contractual cash obligations 75,154 71,958 473 272 2,451
5.6 Trend Information

~~For more details on financial commitments and contingencies, please refer to Item 18.1: ‘‘Financial Statements,’’ beginning on page F-1.~~

~~5.5 Inflation~~

We doare not ~~consider inflation~~aware of any trend, commitment, event or uncertainty that can reasonably be expected to have ~~had~~ a material ~~impact~~effect on our current or future business other than the following, each of which has materially impacted our financial results ~~of operations during~~in the ~~period covered.~~past and may do so in the future:

	•		The deterioration of economic conditions resulting from the global financial and credit crisis and economic downturn.The global financial and economic crisis has affected and is likely to continue to affect adversely each of the markets in which we sell and distribute our products and provide services. There is a reasonable likelihood that sales will stagnate or decrease if there is a reduction in infrastructure development by governmental entities and in capital expenditures by private companies. Please see the risk factor entitled “Current Economic Risks.”

	•		Uncertainty arising from the volatility in the cost of copper, our principal raw material.Recent increases in commodity prices, including those of copper, have caused the Company to write-back the carrying cost of its inventory in 2009. Although copper prices have generally increased

~~5.6~~

in the first few months of 2010, there is no assurance that we will not see volatility in the near future due to the current uncertain economic climate.

	•		Fluctuations in the demand for our products in the markets in which we do business, based upon variations in the level of governmental and private commitments to communications, power and industrial projects and programs that utilize our products.

	•		Political instability or uncertainty resulting in fewer or suspended government contracts, such as in Thailand.The current political unrest in Thailand presents increased risks for foreign investors and may result in a reduced government focus on infrastructure development (which often utilizes the Company’s manufactured products).

See “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.”

5.7 Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not consider the Company to have any material off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on the Company’s financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital ~~resources.~~

resources that would be material to investors.

5.8 Contractual Obligations

The following table sets forth our obligations and commitments to make future payments under contracts and other commitments as of December 31, 2009:


	Payments due by period
			Less						More
Contractual obligations			than 1						than 5
(In thousands of US$)	Total		year		1-3 years		3-5 years		years
Capital lease obligations (principal amount only)	$	338	$	154	$	181	$	3		—
Finance charges on capital lease obligations		35		19		16		—		—
Operating lease obligations		5,290		654		1,734		370		2,532
Purchase obligations for copper cathodes		195,173		195,173		—		—		—

	$	200,836	$	196,000	$	1,931	$	373	$	2,532

For more details on financial commitments and contingencies, please refer to our audited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto in Item 18: “Financial Statements”.

Item 6: Directors, Senior Management and Employees

6.1 Directors and Senior Management

At present, there is only one class of directorships and no one or more directors possesses any veto power over matters presented to the Board or any other special or enhanced voting rights. Until September 7, 2007, the Bye-laws provided for a classified ~~board~~Board consisting of ~~Class A Directors and Class B Directors, with the Board to have~~ up to three Class A Directors and up to seven Class B Directors. Upon the sale by Sino-JP of its 20% interest in the Company to SOF on June 28, 2007, the three Class A Directors designated by Sino-JP resigned from the Board, and the remaining Board members filled those vacancies by appointing Messrs. Jack Sun, David Sun and Andy Cheng. At an annual meeting of shareholders ~~(‘‘AGM’’~~(“AGM”) held on September 7, 2007, the shareholders

passed a

resolution amending the Bye-laws to eliminate the classified ~~board.~~Board. In addition, the Bye-laws were amended to provide that a quorum consists of a majority of the directors then in office. As of December 31, ~~2007,~~2009, there were a total of ten directors on the Board, including two independent directors, Mr. Anson Chan and Dr. Yichin ~~Lee, appointed by the Board to fill casual vacancies.~~Lee. Each director is entitled to one vote, and approval of any matter requires a simple majority assuming a quorum is present.

The following table sets forth certain information concerning the current directors and certain other officers of the ~~Company as of December 31, 2007.~~Company. All directors are subject to annual election by the shareholders of the Company.

Each of the directors was reelected at the Company’s annual general meeting of the shareholders held on September 29, 2009. Officers generally hold office for such period and upon such terms as the Board may determine.


Name	Date of Birth	~~Age~~		Position
Appleby Management	N/A		Resident Representative and Assistant Resident Secretary
(Bermuda) Ltd.
Anson Chan	November 3, 1963		Independent director, Audit Committee Chairman
Andy C.C. Cheng	April 29, 1958		Director and Non-Executive Chairman of the Board
Fang Hsiung Cheng	May 31, 1942		Director
Alex Erskine	September 7, 1963		Resident Secretary in Bermuda
Daphne Hsu	August 12, 1962		Financial Controller
Gai Poo Lee	February 28, 1957		Director
Michael C. Lee	September 28, 1951	56	Director
Yichin Lee	January 4, 1961		Independent director, Audit Committee Member
Ching Rong Shue	March 4, 1950		Director
David Sun	December 22, 1953		Director
Jack Sun	August 27, 1949		Director
Yuan Chun Tang	November 26, 1960	46		Director, ~~and Chairman of the Board~~Chief Executive Officer
~~Ching Rong Shue~~Carson Tien	May 16, 1945	57		~~Director~~Chief Operating Officer
~~Gai Poo Lee~~Frank Tseng	March 17, 1957	50		~~Director~~
~~Fang Hsiung Cheng~~		64		~~Director~~
~~Andy C.C. Cheng~~		49		~~Director~~
~~David Sun~~		54		~~Director~~
~~Jack Sun~~		58		~~Director~~
~~Anson Chan~~		45		~~Director, Audit Committee Chairman~~
~~Yichin Lee~~		47		~~Director, Audit Committee Member~~
~~James M. Keyes~~		42		~~Bermuda Resident~~Chief Financial Officer; Non-Resident Secretary
~~Appleby Management (Bermuda) Ltd.~~		~~N/A~~		~~Resident Representative in Bermuda~~

In addition, on June 28, 2007, Messrs. Wellen Sham, Ryoji Furukawa and Eric Chi Chiu Yip, each of whom was a director-designee of Sino-JP and its affiliate, AMC, resigned from the Board of Directors and from all executive positions with the Company.

Certain officers and directors of the Company are or were also officers and directors of PEWC and/or PEWC affiliates, as described below. A brief professional summary for each member of the Board of Directors ~~as of December 31, 2007~~and senior management is as follows:

Mr. ~~Michael C. Lee~~Anson Chan has been an independent member of the Company’s Board of Directors and a member and Chairman of the Audit Committee since 2007. Mr. Chan is also a Managing Director of the Bonds Group of Companies and was a Senior Advisor to Elliott Associates from 2005 to 2008.

Mr. Andy C.C. Cheng was a member of the Company’s Board of Directors ~~as well Chief Executive Officer of PEWC.~~from 2004 to 2005 and was re-elected in 2007. Mr. ~~Lee also serves~~Cheng was appointed as Chairman of ~~Pacific USA Holdings, Ltd.~~the Board in 2009. From 1987 to 2003, Mr. ~~Lee became a director~~Cheng served as Vice President in charge of procurement at PEWC. Mr. Cheng has been an Executive Vice President at PEWC since 2004 and Chairman of each of the ~~Company in 2004.~~

investment divisions of PEWC, Tai Ho Investment Co., Ltd. and You Chi Investment Co., Ltd., since June 2008. Mr. ~~Yuan Chun Tang~~Andy C.C. Cheng is ~~a member of the Board of Directors of the Company. He also serves as Chairman of PEWC.~~not related to Mr. ~~Yuan became a director of the Company in 2004 and was appointed Chairman of the Company in 2005.~~

Fang Hsiung Cheng.

Mr. ~~Ching Rong Shue~~ isFang Hsiung Cheng has been a member of the Company’s Board of ~~Directors. He also serves as Vice President of PEWC. Mr. Shue became a director of the Company in~~Directors since 2006.

~~Mr. Gai Poo Lee~~ ~~is a member of the Company’s Board of Directors. He also serves as Vice President of PEWC. Mr. Lee became a director of the Company in 2006.~~

~~Mr. Fang Hsiung Cheng~~ ~~is a member of the Company’s Board of Directors.~~ He also serves as Assistant Vice President of PEWC. Mr. Fang Hsiung Cheng ~~became~~is not related to Mr. Andy C.C. Cheng.

Mr. Alex Erskine was appointed as resident Secretary in Bermuda in October 2008. Mr. Erskine is a ~~director~~partner in the Bermuda law firm of Appleby, where he is the local team leader of the funds and investment services practice group, which group he joined in 1999. From March 2007 until October 2008, Mr. Erskine was the managing partner of the British Virgin Islands office of Appleby. Prior to joining Appleby, Mr. Erskine was Deputy Legal and Compliance Director of the Asset Management Division of UBS AG.

Ms. Daphne Hsu has been Financial Controller of the Company since March 2005, prior to which she served as Financial Controller for ten years in ~~2006.~~

Taiwan and China at a Thomson SA joint venture.

Mr. ~~David Sun~~ isGai Poo Lee has been a member of the Company’s Board of ~~Directors.~~Directors since 2006. He also served as a Vice President of PEWC until April 2008. Mr. Gai Poo Lee is not related to Mr. Michael C. Lee or Dr. Yichin Lee.

Mr. Michael C. Lee has been a member of the Company’s Board of Directors since 2004 and is also Chief Executive Officer of PEWC and Chairman of Pacific USA Holdings, Ltd. Mr. Michael C. Lee is not related to Mr. Gai Poo Lee or Dr. Yichin Lee.

Dr. Yichin Lee has been an independent member of the Company’s Board of Directors and served on the Audit Committee since 2007. Dr. Lee is also the Managing Director of Giant Management Consulting LLC and an independent director of Giga Media Limited. Dr. Yichin Lee holds a doctorate degree in resource planning and management from Stanford University. Dr. Yichin Lee is not related to Mr. Michael C. Lee or Mr. Gai Poo Lee.

Mr. Ching Rong Shue has been a member of the Company’s Board of Directors since 2006. He also serves as Vice President of PEWC.

Mr. David Sun has been a member of the Company’s Board of Directors since 2007. He also serves as President of PEWC and Managing Director of Charoong Thai Wire and Cable Public Company Limited. Mr. David Sun ~~became a director~~is the younger brother of ~~the Company in 2007.~~

Mr. Jack Sun.

Mr. Jack Sun ~~is a member of the Company’s Board of Directors. Mr. Sun became a director of the Company in 2007.~~

~~Mr. Anson Chan~~ is has been a member of the Company’s Board of Directors ~~and serves on the Audit Committee~~since 2007. Mr. Sun is also Vice Chairman of PEWC. Mr. Sun served as ~~its Chairman. He is an independent director. He also is a Managing~~Chairman of Taiwan Aerospace Corp. from 1994 to 2006, Chairman of Taiwan Mobile Co., Ltd. from 1997 to 2003, Chairman of Taiwan Fixed Network Co., Ltd. from 2000 to 2003 and Director of Taiwan High Speed Rail Corp. from 1998 to 2007. Mr. Jack Sun is the ~~Bonds Group~~older brother of ~~Companies and a Senior Advisor to Elliott Associates.~~ Mr. ~~Chan became a director of the Company in 2007.~~

~~Dr. Yichin Lee~~ isDavid Sun.

Mr. Yuan Chun Tang has been a member of the Company’s Board of Directors since 2004 and ~~serves on~~Chief Executive Officer since 2005. Mr. Yuan served as the ~~Audit Committee.~~Company’s Chairman from 2005 to 2009. He ~~is an independent director. He~~has also isserved as Chairman of PEWC since 2004 and has been the ~~Managing~~ Director of ~~Giant Management Consulting LLC. Dr. Lee became a director~~Pacific Construction Corp. Ltd since 2002. Mr. Yuan served as the Director of Taiwan Co-generation Corp from 2005 to 2008. Mr. Yuan has also been the Chairman of Taiwan Electric Wire & Cable Industries Association since 2004. He has served as the Supervisor to Taipei Importers/Exporters Association as well as the Director of Chinese National Federation of Industries in Taiwan since 1998 and 2004, respectively.

Mr. Carson Tien has been with PEWC or one of its affiliates such as APWC for his entire career. He started out as engineer in PEWC’s Tao Yuan, Taiwan plant in 1969 and later was promoted to plant manager in 1977. In 1990 Carson again was promoted to Assistant VP responsible for Engineering and Manufacturing in PEWC. He then in 1996 was transferred from PEWC to APWC to head the Shenzhen, China plant as President of PEWSC. In 2005, he was appointed as Chief Operating Officer at APWC headquarters.

Mr. Frank Tseng was appointed as Chief Financial Officer and Non-Resident Company Secretary effective October 22, 2009. Mr. Tseng previously served as the Deputy CFO for ABB Taiwan. Prior to that, he served as the Financial Controller of the ~~Company in 2007.~~

Asia Pacific region of Phoenix Technologies Co., a Nasdaq-listed California Silicon Valley-based high-tech company.

Notwithstanding any relationship with PEWC or with any of its affiliates, the above named individuals, in their capacities as directors and officers of the Company, are subject to fiduciary duties to the Company.

As of the date of the filing of this Annual Report, the Board consists of ten members. The following eight members were elected by shareholders at the 2007 AGM: Michael Lee, Andy C.C. Cheng, David T. Sun, Jack T. Sun, Gai Poo Lee, Ching Rong Shue, Fang-Hsiung Cheng and Yuan Chun Tang. Two independent directors, Anson Chan and Yichin Lee, were appointed to the casual vacancy positions by the Board on September 28, 2007.

Actions may be taken by a quorum of directors (which consists of a majority of the directors then in office) present at a ~~board~~Board meeting. The Bye-Laws of the Company provide that any one director may call a ~~board~~Board meeting.

As the Company is not currently listed on any national exchanges, the Company is not required to have a Board of Directors that is composed of a majority of independent directors. In the event that the Company seeks to list its Common Shares on a national exchange, the Company may choose to rely upon the ~~‘‘controlled~~“controlled company ~~exception’’~~exemption” that is available to issuers on a number of national exchanges. In effect, the ~~‘‘controlled~~“controlled company ~~exception’’~~exemption” provides that an issuer listing on a national exchange that recognizes the ~~exception~~exemption is not required to have its Board of Directors consist of a majority of independent directors if a shareholder, or two or more shareholders who constitute a group, have beneficial ownership of more than 50% of the issued and outstanding voting securities of the issuer.

No service contract exists between any director and the Company or any of its subsidiaries providing for benefits upon termination of employment.

The Company has no arrangements or understandings with any major shareholders, customers, suppliers or others, pursuant to which any person referred to above was selected as a director or member of senior management.

6.2 Audit Committee

The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors primarily functions to assist the Board in its oversight of: (i) the reliability and integrity of accounting policies and financial reporting and disclosure practices and (ii) the establishment and maintenance of processes to ensure that there is compliance with all applicable laws, regulations and company policy and an adequate system of internal control, management of business risks and safeguard of assets.

On September 28, 2007, the Company filled two casual vacancies on the Board by appointing Mr. Anson Chan and Dr. Yichin Lee to be independent directors of the Company and to constitute the Audit Committee of the Board. Mr. Chan and Dr. Lee were reelected to the Board at the annual general meeting of the shareholders held on September 29, 2009. The Audit Committee is currently composed of Mr. Chan and Dr. Lee, with Mr. Chan serving as the committee’s chairman.

As the Common Shares are traded on the OTC BB, the Company is not required to have an audit committee that meets the requirements of Regulation 10A-3 of the Exchange Act. In the absence of an audit committee, the full Board of Directors may fulfill the functions of an audit committee pursuant to Section 3(a)(58) of the Exchange Act. Until the appointment of ~~a new~~Mr. Chan and Dr. Lee to the Audit Committee on September 28, 2007, the full Board of Directors fulfilled the functions of an audit committee.

On September 28, 2007, the Company filled two casual vacancies on the Board by appointing Mr. Anson Chan and Dr. Yichin Lee to be independent directors of the Company and to constitute the Audit Committee of the Board. As of the date of the filing of this Annual Report, the Audit Committee is composed of Mr. Chan and Dr. Lee, with Mr. Chan serving as the committee’s chairman.

6.3 Compensation Committee

On June 13, 2008, the Board authorized the formation of a ~~compensation committee~~Compensation Committee to assist the Company in determining the compensation to be paid to the executive directors of the Company. According to the terms of reference under which it operates, the Compensation Committee is authorized to: (i) review and recommend to the Board, or determine, the annual salary, bonus, stock options, and other benefits, direct and indirect, of the senior management of the Company and its principal operating subsidiaries; (ii) review new executive compensation programs, review on a periodic basis the operation of the Company’s executive compensation programs to determine whether they are properly coordinated, establish and periodically review policies for the administration of executive compensation programs, and take steps to modify any executive compensation programs that yield payments and benefits that are not reasonably related to executive performance; (iii) engage outside auditors and consultants to advise on market compensation; and (iv) establish and periodically review policies in the area of management perquisites.

The ~~compensation committee~~Compensation Committee is comprised of one independent director, Mr. Anson Chan, and three additional directors, Mr. Yuan Chun Tang (acting as committee chairman), Mr. David T. Sun, and

Mr. Michael C. Lee. ~~The~~At a meeting of the Board ~~previously formed a compensation committee in 2003,~~on July 30, 2008, the ~~last~~Board appointed Mr. Andy Cheng to serve as an additional member ~~of which resigned~~ on ~~June 29, 2006. The Board never appointed new directors to such committee.~~

the Compensation Committee.

6.4 Compensation

The aggregate amount of compensation paid by the Company to all of the Company’s directors and executive officers, as a group, for services in all capacities during ~~2007~~2009 was approximately ~~$1.4~~$1.26 million. As of ~~December~~March 31, ~~2007,~~2009, our directors and executive officers beneficially owned ~~10,000~~approximately 50,000 Common Shares representing approximately ~~0.072%~~0.4% of the issued and outstanding Common Shares.

The Company is not required to disclose the annual compensation of its executive officers and directors on an individual basis under the laws of Bermuda or Taiwan.

The fee ~~for the~~payable to independent directors is $20,000 per year and the fee payable to directors who are executive officers of the Company or PEWC is $10,000 per year, together with, in each case, reimbursement of reasonable travel expenses for attendance of meetings of the Board of Directors.

~~Presently, there~~

No funds or provisions have been set aside to directors or management except for government mandated programs. The aggregate number of shares held by directors and executive officers is no group policy on bonus or profit-sharing plan or stock options. However, the Company’s subsidiaries have their respective bonus or profit-sharing plans based on individual performance and subsidiaries’ profitability for the fiscal year, which are generally in accordance with the industry practice and market conditions in the respective countries.

50,000 shares.

6.5 Employees

~~Certain relevant information regarding the Company’s employees as of December 31, 2007 is described in this Section 6.5.~~

The Company employed a total of ~~approximately 1,816~~1,615 employees ~~in 2007,~~as of December 31, 2009, of which about ~~18%~~17% were administrative and management personnel. Approximately ~~58%~~52% of employees ~~are~~were located in Thailand, 30% in China, 8%9% in Singapore and 4% in Australia. Production workers are usually organized into two 12-hour shifts or three 8-hour shifts to allow continuous factory operation.

The Company offers a range of employee benefits, which it believes are comparable to industry practice in its local markets. Such benefits include performance-based pay incentives, medical benefits, vacation, pension, housing for a small number of workers in Singapore and in Thailand, and a small housing supplement to other workers. The Company also provides training programs for its personnel designed to improve worker productivity and occupational safety.

Presently, there is no group bonus, profit-sharing or stock option plan. However, some of the Company’s subsidiaries have bonus or profit-sharing plans based on individual performance and the profitability of the particular subsidiary for the fiscal year, which plans are generally in accordance with the industry practice and market conditions in the respective countries.

The Company has several defined benefit and defined contribution plans covering its employees in Thailand, Australia, the PRC and Singapore. Contributions to the plans are made on an annual basis and totaled $0.7 million in 2009. Additionally, the Company has several defined benefit plans in accordance with Thailand labor law. In Thai subsidiaries the companies must pay a retiring employee from one to ten times such employee’s salary rate during his or her final month, depending on the length of service. During 2009, the Company’s total expenses under this labor law were $0.5 million. These plans are not funded and the amount is recognized and included in Other Current Liabilities in the Company’s balance sheet. The Company settles it obligations as and when employees retire. The accumulated benefit obligations under this plan amounted to $2.0 million as at December 31, 2009.

Approximately 60% of the employees of Sigma Cable are members of the United Workers of Electronics & Electrical Industries, an employees’ union in Singapore. Under the terms of a collective agreement signed in June 2003, the Company is required to negotiate salary and wage increases yearly. All other worker benefits and employment terms are included in the collective agreement. The Company believes that

approximately 100% and 97% of the employees of PEWS and Shanghai Yayang, respectively, are members of their respective Company Workers’ Unions. These unions generally operate in accordance with related labor regulations in China. Approximately 18% of the employees of APEC are members of the Australian Workers’ Union. None of the employees of ~~Siam Pacific, Pacific Thai, Charoong Thai or APEC~~the other operating subsidiaries of the Company are members of a union.

The Company has never experienced a strike or other disruption due to labor disputes. The Company considers its employee relations to be ~~good~~satisfactory and has not experienced difficulties attracting and retaining qualified employees. In Singapore, employee turnover is approximately 8%30.4% of total employees annually. In Thailand, employee turnover is approximately 3%8.7% of total employees annually.

Item 7: Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions

7.1 Major Shareholders

~~As of December 31, 2004,~~

From September 15, 2005 until June 28, 2007, Sino-JP Fund Ltd, a company incorporated under the laws of the Cayman Islands, was the owner of 10,074,102 Common Shares, representing approximately 72.84% of the issued and outstanding Common Shares. Pacific Electric Wire & Cable Corporation was the owner, indirectly, of 356,757 Common Shares, representing approximately 2.56% of the issued and outstanding Common Shares. The remaining Common Shares were held ~~by investors who purchased in the public market. See Section 4.1.2: ‘‘Recent Developments.’’~~

~~In July 2004, the Company and PEWC entered into a Settlement Agreement with Set Top International Inc. (‘‘Set Top’’), pursuant to which it was agreed that Set Top would be paid~~

$25,000,000 in exchange for the release of all claims of an ownership interest in 10,074,102 Common Shares and the dismissal by all parties of all claims in litigation proceedings against each other, which included actions in New York, Singapore and Bermuda (the ‘‘Set Top Settlement Agreement’’). In addition, Set Top agreed to withdraw all of its claims in the bankruptcy proceedings of Pacific USA Holdings Ltd. (‘‘PUSA’’), a Dallas based subsidiary of PEWC.

Under a Share Purchase Agreement dated September 10, 2004 by PEWC and Asset Managers Co., Ltd. (‘‘AMC’’), AMC agreed to purchase the 10,074,102 Common Shares from Set Top for purchase consideration of $25,000,000 (the ‘‘2004 Share Purchase Agreement’’). In addition, AMC entered into an Option Agreement dated September 10, 2004 (the ‘‘2004 Option Agreement’’) granting to PEWC an option (the ‘‘Repurchase Option’’) to purchase 7,307,948 Common Shares (the ‘‘Repurchased Shares’’), representing approximately 52.84% of the issued and outstanding Common Shares.

Until the implementation of the Set Top Settlement Agreement, PEWC owned indirectly 10,430,769 shares of the Company. Following the implementation of the Set Top Settlement Agreement and the closing of the 2004 Share Purchase Agreement, Sino-JP owned 10,074,102 Common Shares of the Company, representing approximately 72.84% of the issued and outstanding Common Shares, and PEWC owned indirectly 356,757 shares of the Company, representing approximately 2.56% of the issued and outstanding Common Shares.

On September 14, 2005, PEWC exercised the Repurchase Option and reacquired the Repurchased Shares for an aggregate purchase price of $18,861,813.78, or $2.581 per share, plus a guaranteed return. Exercising the Repurchase Option required approval of the PEWC Banking Group, which imposed certain conditions on PEWC. One condition imposed by the PEWC Banking Group was that PEWC enter into a letter of undertaking (the ‘‘PEWC Letter of Undertaking’’) which provided that, among other conditions, PEWC enter into a trust agreement with the PEWC Banking Group (the ‘‘PEWC Trust Agreement’’), under which the Repurchased Shares were registered in Bermuda in the name of Chiao Tung Bank Trust Department Trust Assets (‘‘CTB’’), although PEWC retained beneficial ownership of the Repurchased Shares unless and until there occurred an event of default under the PEWC Trust Agreement. In May 2006 the PEWC Banking Group determined that PEWC had fulfilled or was in a position to fulfill the requirements with respect to the PEWC Trust Agreement. Therefore, on June 6, 2006, CTB, on behalf of the PEWC Banking Group, delivered a letter instructing termination of the PEWC Trust Agreement and authorizing the registration of the Repurchased Shares on behalf of PEWC without any pledge or encumbrance of the PEWC Banking Group. See Section 4.1.2: ‘‘Recent Developments.’’

~~On June 2007, Sino-JP sold its~~ 2,766,154 Common Shares, representing 20% of the issued and outstanding Common Shares of the ~~Company,~~Company. On June 28, 2007, Sino-JP sold all of its Common Shares to SOF Investments, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership ~~(‘‘SOF’’~~(“SOF”)~~, all~~. From September 15, 2005 until March 27, 2009, PEWC held 7,664,615 Common Shares, representing 55.4% of the ~~directors~~issued and ~~officers~~outstanding Common Shares of the Company. On March 27, 2009, SOF sold 1,410,739, or 51%, of its Common Shares to PEWC. Since that sale, PEWC and SOF have held 65.6% and 9.8% of the issued and outstanding Common Shares of the Company, ~~designated by Sino-JP tendered their resignations~~respectively. The remaining 24.6% of the issues and ~~Sino-JP ceased to have any interest~~outstanding Common Shares are publicly traded in the ~~Company. In connection with that purchase,~~U.S. on the ~~Company, SOF and PEWC entered into a shareholders agreement dated June 28, 2007. See Section 7.2: ‘‘Related Party Transactions.’’~~

over-the-counter bulletin board (the “OTC BB”).

The following table sets forth certain information regarding beneficial ownership of the Company’s capital stock as of ~~December~~March 31, ~~2007~~2010 by (i) all persons who are known to the Company to own beneficially more than five percent of the Common Shares of the Company and (ii) the officers and directors of the Company as a group. The information set forth in the following table is derived from public filings made by holders and information obtained from directors and officers. The voting rights attaching to the Common Shares below are the same as those attaching to all other Common Shares.


	Number of
Identity of Person or Group	Shares		Percent of Class
Pacific Electric Wire & Cable Co., Ltd.⁽¹⁾		9,075,354		65.600	%
SOF Investments, L.P.⁽²⁾		1,355,415		9.800	%
Directors and Officers of the Company		50,000		0.362	%


(1)		PEWC owns 1,410,739 shares directly and owns its remaining shares indirectly, as a result of PEWC’s control of its direct wholly-owned subsidiary, Moon View Ventures Limited, a British Virgin Islands company, which beneficially owns 7,307,948 Common Shares, and as a result of PEWC’s control of its indirect wholly-owned subsidiary, Pacific Holdings Group, a Nevada corporation, which beneficially owns 356,667 Common Shares.

(2)		MSD Capital, L.P. (“MSD Capital”) is the general partner of SOF and may be deemed to have or share voting and/or investment power over, and beneficially own, securities owned by SOF. MSD Capital Management LLC is the general partner of MSD Capital and may be deemed to have or share voting and/or investment power over, and beneficially own, securities owned by MSD Capital. Each of Glenn R. Fuhrman, John C. Phelan and Marc R. Lisker is a manager of MSD Capital Management and may be deemed to have or share voting and/or investment power over, and beneficially own, securities owned by MSD Capital Management. Each of Messrs. Fuhrman, Phelan and Lisker disclaim beneficial ownership of such securities, except to the extent of the pecuniary interest of such person in such securities.

Identity of Person or Group Number of
Shares Percent of Class
Pacific Electric Wire & Cable Co., Ltd. 7,664,615 55.400 %
SOF Investments, L.P. 2,766,154 20.000 %
Directors and Officers of the Company 10,000 0.072 %
The Company has 6,166,154 Common Shares that are registered securities, of which 3,400,000 Common Shares are publicly-traded on the OTC BB, which represents 24.6% of the issued and outstanding Common Shares. The remaining registered securities, 2,766,154 Common Shares, are held by PEWC and SOF, and are subject to trading restrictions under Rule 144 promulgated under the Securities Act. Other than the approximately 50,000 Common Shares held by directors or officers who are not resident in the United States

and the 1,410,739 registered securities held indirectly by PEWC, the Company believes that substantially all of its registered securities are held by U.S residents. The Company has no means to definitively confirm that belief, however, which is based upon a review of the share registers maintained by the Company’s Bermuda transfer agent and U.S. transfer agent and the addresses provided by the record holders. Based upon a review of the records of the Company’s U.S. transfer agent, including a list of non-objecting beneficial holders (NOBOs), the Company believes there are between 400 and 600 beneficial holders that are resident in the United States, although that range constitutes only the Company’s best estimate of the number of U.S. beneficial holders.

7.2 Related Party Transactions

On September 2004, certain accounts payable to PEWC in the amount of $9.7 million from Sigma Cable Company (Private) Limited (“Sigma Cable”), a subsidiary in Singapore, were converted into a loan from PEWC. Such loan is repayable in quarterly installments and bears interest at the Singapore Interbank Offered Rate plus 1.52%. As of December 31, ~~2007,~~2009 and the ~~Company’s largest short-term~~latest practicable date, the principal amount of the loan was ~~$1.5~~completely paid off by Sigma Cable. Sigma Cable continues to incur ordinary course trade payables with PEWC in connection with copper purchases and the sale of distributed products on behalf of PEWC.

As of December 31, 2009 and the latest practicable date, the Company, including its subsidiaries, had a principal balance outstanding of $1.7 million borrowed from subsidiaries of PEWC, including Moon View Venture Limited (“Moon View”). This short-term indebtedness is payable on a subsidiary of PEWC. The loan is unsecured. As of December 31, 2007, the only long-term loan was from PEWC, with $0.2 million outstanding. As of December 31, 2007, the loan was unsecured, interest-freedemand basis and ~~repayable in 2008.~~

does not accrue interest.

The Company isused the proceeds from each of the related party loans described above for working capital and purchases of capital equipment.

The Company was a party to a shareholders agreement dated June 28, 2007, together with PEWC and SOF (the ~~‘‘Shareholders Agreement’’~~“Shareholders Agreement”), pursuant to which the Company granted to SOF certain rights and protections. Under the Shareholders Agreement, the Company ~~has~~ agreed to indemnify SOF, and its partners and certain of its affiliates (the ~~‘‘SOF~~“SOF Indemnified ~~Persons’’~~Persons”), for any additional taxes, interest, penalties and other costs that might be imposed upon or incurred by the SOF Indemnified Persons in the event that the Company is determined by the Internal Revenue Service (the ~~‘‘IRS’’~~“IRS”) to be a ~~‘‘controlled~~“controlled foreign ~~corporation’’~~corporation” (a ~~‘‘CFC’’~~“CFC”) or a ~~‘‘passive~~“passive foreign investment ~~company’’~~company” (a ~~‘‘PFIC’’~~“PFIC”) as such terms are interpreted and defined under IRS rules or regulations. In addition, under the Shareholders Agreement, the Company granted to SOF certain registration rights with respect to its Common Shares, including the undertaking by the Company to prepare and file a shelf registration statement, and the further right of SOF to exercise two demand registration rights with regard to the Common Shares owned by it and to further exercise certain piggyback registration rights in connection with its Common Shares. Moreover, the Company agreed to use its reasonable best efforts to cause the Common Shares to be listed on a national “Securities Market,” which means any of the Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc. (Global Market or Global Select Market), the American Stock Exchange LLC (now known as NYSE Amex Equities) or the New York Stock Exchange LLC, not later than January 31, 2009, subject to notice and a sixty (60) day cure period. All of the costs and expenses of the Company in connection with the fulfillment of its obligations under the Shareholders Agreement were to be paid by the Company, other than underwriting fees, discounts and commissions attributable to the sale of Common Shares held by SOF.

On February 2, 2009, SOF delivered notice of its exercise of the put right under the Shareholders Agreement to PEWC due to fact that the Common Shares were not listed on a national Securities Market as of January 31, 2009. On March 27, 2009, SOF sold 51% of the Common Shares held by it to PEWC. In connection with the sale, the Company, PEWC and SOF amended and restated the Shareholders Agreement (the “Amended and Restated Shareholders Agreement”), which among other things, grants to the Company an extension for listing its Common Shares on a national exchange until February 2011 and maintains for SOF the right to sell its remaining Common Shares to PEWC in the event the Company is not able to list its Common Shares on a national Securtities Market by February 2011. The Amended and Restated Shareholders Agreement contains the same registration and indemnification obligations set forth in the Shareholders Agreement.

Other than the Amended and Restated Shareholders Agreement, the Company is not a party to any agreements, and has not engaged in any other transactions, with SOF, or to the Company’s knowledge, its owners. For a more detailed description of the Company’s obligations under the Amended and Restated Shareholders Agreement, see the risk factor entitled “Obligations under Shareholders Agreement.”

Under the terms of the Composite Services Agreement, APWC pays a management fee to PEWC in connection with the secondment, or temporary assignment and relocation, of certain PEWC managers to APWC facilities in Shenzhen and Thailand. The assigned managers assist APWC in implementing the results of certain research and development conducted by PEWC and made available by PEWC to the Company under the terms of the Composite Services Agreement. The assigned managers also assist APWC in the procurement of raw materials, primarily copper, which is also provided for under the Composite Services Agreement. The amount of such annual management fee was $183,000 as of December 31, 2009.

Additional details regarding related party balances as of December 31, ~~2007~~2009 and related party transactions, ~~during 2007~~including copper purchases from PEWC, are disclosed in Note 1715 of our audited consolidated financial statements in Item 18: ‘‘Financial Statements.’’

There have been no other related party transactions or contracts entered into between PEWC and APWC in 2009.

Item 8: Financial Information

8.1 Legal Proceedings
~~8.1.1~~ ~~Sino-JP/PEWC/APWC Litigation (Settled); See Section 4.1.2: ‘‘Recent Developments’’~~

~~Following~~

There are currently no material proceedings in which any director, senior manager, or affiliate is adverse to the ~~acquisition~~Company or has an adverse material interest. The following is a summary of ~~Common Shares by Sino-JP, a number of disputes arose between Sino-JP and PEWC regarding the governance~~recent legal proceedings of the Company ~~and other matters. Litigation was commenced in Bermuda, in~~ which the Company was named a party, and in Hong Kong, in which the Company was not named a party. On June 28, 2007, the Company entered into a comprehensive settlement and release agreement with Sino-JP (the ‘‘Settlement Agreement’’), which dismissed and released all claims between the parties and which put an end to all related litigation. PEWC also entered into a settlement and release agreement with Sino-JP that terminated all disputes and litigation between those parties. On the same date, SOF Investments, L.P. (‘‘SOF’’), a Delaware limited partnership, acquired all of the Common Shares then held by Sino-JP (the ‘‘SOF Acquisition’’) and entered into a shareholders agreement with the Company and PEWC. Upon the closing of that acquisition, all of the directors and officers designated by Sino-JP submitted their resignations and Sino-JP ceased tomay have, ~~any interest~~or have had in the ~~Company. As part of~~recent past, significant effects on the ~~Settlement Agreement, the Company agreed to indemnify all of those Sino-JP designated directors and officers (the ‘‘Sino-JP Indemnified Persons’’) for all acts~~Company’s financial position or omissions taken in their capacity as a director or officer to the maximum extent permitted under the memorandum of association and the Bye-laws of the Company and the Bermuda Companies Act (the ‘‘Companies Act’’). See Section 4.1.2: ‘‘Recent Developments.’’

~~8.1.2 Sigma Cable/Highness Electrical Litigation (Appealed)~~

profitability.

In June 2005, Highness Electrical Engineering Pte Ltd ~~(‘‘~~(“Highness ~~Electrical’’~~Electrical”) commenced an action in the High Court of Singapore (the ~~‘‘High Court’’~~“High Court”) against Sigma Cable claiming damages arising from an alleged breach of a contract. The parties entered into a contract on December 17, 2003 for the supply by Sigma Cable to Highness Electrical of various types of electrical cables from December 2003 to December 31, 2005. By early February 2005, Sigma had not delivered goods that had been on order for several months. As a result, on February 3, 2005, Highness Electrical claimed Sigma Cable ~~had~~ repudiated the contract. On March 30, 2005, Sigma Cable agreed to supply electrical cables at the prices originally agreed to. However, in June 2005, Highness Electrical instituted an action to recover damages for the loss it claimed that it had suffered as a result of having to pay higher prices for the electrical cable. In June 2006, the High Court ruled that Sigma Cable had repudiated the contract and ordered that the assessment of damages be done by ~~the Registrar.~~

Sigma Cable. Sigma Cable appealed the High Court’s verdict, but the determination that Sigma Cable was liable for damages has been upheld on appeal. In February 2008, the Supreme Court assessed damages of approximately $886,000. This amount was paid to Highness Electrical in 2008. Sigma Cable is currently considering the merits of appealing this determination of damages. ~~However, Sigma Cable has taken a write-down of its accounts receivable in 2005 in the amount of $886,000 in order to account for this adverse judgment.~~

8.2 Dividend Policy

To date, the Company, a Bermuda company formed in 1996, has not paid any dividends. While the Company has no present intention to pay dividends, should it decide in the future to do so, as a holding company the Company’s ability to pay dividends, as well as to meet its other obligations, will depend upon the amount of distributions, if any, received from the Company’s operating subsidiaries and other holdings and investments. The Company’s operating subsidiaries and other holdings and investments, from time to time, may be subject to restrictions on their ability to make distributions to the Company, including as a result of restrictive covenants contained in loan agreements, restrictions on the conversion of local currency earnings into U.S. dollars or other hard currency and other regulatory restrictions. The foregoing restrictions may also affect the Company’s ability to fund operations of one subsidiary with dividends and other ~~paymen ts~~payments received from another subsidiary.

8.3 Significant Changes

There have been no material or significant changes in the Company’s affairs since the end of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 that have not been described herein.

Item 9: The Offer and Listing

9.1 Historical Trading Information

~~From March 26, 1997 through December 31, 2001, the Company’s~~

The high and low market prices for Common Shares ~~were listed and traded~~ on the ~~New York Stock Exchange~~over-the-counter bulletin board (the ~~‘‘NYSE’’~~“OTC BB”) ~~under the symbol ‘‘AWC.’’ Prior to such listing, there was no public market for the Company’s equity securities.~~

~~The Company’s Common Shares were subsequently delisted from the NYSE in the first quarter of 2002 and were traded~~(until August 2005), on the ~~Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board (the ‘‘OTC BB’’)~~Pink Sheets (from August 2005 until April 2008), which is an electronic quotation service for trading of shares of OTC securities among market makers who are NASD members. As a foreign private issuer, the Company is required to file its annual report on Form 20-F with the SEC within six months following the close of its fiscal year. The Company was not in a position to make the filing of its 2004 annual report on a timely basis. After the expiration of an automatic grace period, on August 29, 2005 the OTC BB delisted the Company for failure to remain current in the filing of its periodic reports. The Company relistedand again on the OTC BB in(since April 2008) for each period specified are as follows:


	Price per Share
	($)
	High		Low
Five most recent full financial years:
2005		4.75		1.20
2006		3.20		0.80
2007		7.19		2.50
2008		6.45		0.80
2009		3.39		0.50

Two most recent full financial years:
2008
First Quarter		6.10		4.55
Second Quarter		6.45		5.50
Third Quarter		5.50		2.65
Fourth Quarter		5.10		0.80
2009
First Quarter		1.50		0.50
Second Quarter		1.98		0.90
Third Quarter		2.90		1.45
Fourth Quarter		3.39		2.15
2010
First Quarter		3.00		2.25

Most recent six months:
November 2009		3.00		2.65
December 2009		2.95		2.15
January 2010		2.99		2.25


	Price per Share
	($)
	High		Low
February 2010		2.85		2.50
March 2010		3.00		2.55
April 2010		3.00		2.55

9.2 Markets

The Company has been listed on the OTC BB since April 2008 under the symbol ~~‘‘AWRCF.’’ Until that re-listing on the OTCBB,~~“AWRCF,” immediately prior to which the Common Shares were traded on the Pink Sheets. See ~~Section 3.3.1: ‘‘Potential~~the risk factor entitled “Potential Illiquidity of Common ~~Shares’’ and Section 4.1.2: ‘‘Recent Developments.’’~~Shares.” The Common Shares are not listed on any other exchanges or otherwise publicly traded within or outside the United States.

The Company intends to apply for a listing on either the Nasdaq or NYSE Amex Equities (formerly known as the American Stock Exchange), as and when the Company meets the listing criteria for one of those exchanges.

Item 10: Additional Information

~~The high and low sales price for~~

10.1 Share Capital

On September 8, 2008, our shareholders approved an increase to our authorized share capital from 20,000,000 Common Shares, ~~on the OTC BB (from January 2003 until August 2005)~~par value $0.01 per share, to 50,000,000 Common Shares, par value $0.01 per share. As of December 31, 2008 and ~~on the Pink Sheets (from August 2005 until December 2007) for each quarterly period from the first quarter of 2003 to the last quarter of 2007 are~~ as ~~follows:~~

Price per Share ($)
High Low
2003
First Quarter 1.06 0.83
Second Quarter 1.60 0.75
Third Quarter 2.74 1.40
Fourth Quarter 3.60 2.15
2004
First Quarter 3.10 2.25
Second Quarter 2.90 1.90
Third Quarter 3.49 2.20
Fourth Quarter 4.75 2.90
2005
First Quarter 4.80 3.75
Second Quarter 4.00 2.20
Third Quarter 2.55 1.20
Fourth Quarter 2.23 1.40
2006
First Quarter 1.60 0.81
Second Quarter 1.60 0.83
Third Quarter 4.00 0.99
Fourth Quarter 2.95 2.15
2007
First Quarter 4.20 2.50
Second Quarter 5.00 3.03
Third Quarter 7.19 4.95
Fourth Quarter 5.95 4.50

~~9.2 Nature of the Trading Market~~

As of the date of the filing of this Annual Report, ~~our~~there were and are 13,830,769 Common Shares ~~are quoted~~issued and ~~traded on~~outstanding. No capital of the ~~OTC BB~~Company is under option or agreed conditionally or unconditionally to be put under option. The stock option plan established by the ~~symbol ‘‘AWRCF.’’~~

Company in 1996 prior to its initial public offering was terminated by the Board of Directors in 2006. No options were ever exercised and no Common Shares were ever issued under that terminated stock option plan.

~~Item 10: Additional Information~~

~~10.1~~10.2 Memorandum of Association and Bye-laws


	~~10.1.1~~	~~General~~

10.2.1 General

For a detailed description of the Company’s principal activities, see Section 4.1: ~~‘‘History~~“History and Development of the ~~Company.’’ The Company’s Bye-laws were amended on December 16, 2004 to establish a classified Board of Directors consisting of up to three Class A Directors and up to seven Class B Directors.~~Business.” On September 7, 2007, the Company’s Bye-Laws were amended ~~again~~ to delete ~~the~~ provisions providing for a classified Board of Directors and to ~~provide~~allow the shareholders to set the number of directors. At the annual general meeting held on September 7, 2007, the shareholders provided that the Board shall consist of up to ten (10) directors of a single ~~class,~~class. Pursuant to the Company’s Bye-laws, each ~~with~~director has one vote on all matters put to the Board, and ~~that~~ a quorum shall consist of a majority of the members of the Board of Directors then in office. The Company’s Bye-laws, as so amended, were filed with the annual report of the Company on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004.


	~~10.1.2~~	~~Description of Shareholder Rights Attaching to Our Common Shares~~

The Company’s Bye-Laws were further amended on September 8, 2008 to increase the authorized share capital. The Company’s Bye-laws, as so further amended, were filed on February 18, 2009 as Exhibit 3.2 to Amendment No. 4 to the Company’s registration statement on Form F-1 filed on February 18, 2009.

10.2.2 Description of Shareholder Rights Attaching to Our Common Shares

The Company was incorporated in Bermuda on September 19, 1996 under the Companies Act. The rights of our shareholders are governed by Bermuda law and our memorandum of association and Bye-laws.

The following discussion of our Common Shares and the laws governing the rights of our shareholders is based upon the advice of Appleby, our Bermuda counsel.

Our authorized share capital as of ~~$200,000 consists~~December 31, 2009 was $500,000 consisting of ~~20,000,000~~50,000,000 Common Shares, par value $0.01 per share, of which, as of December 31, ~~2007~~2009 and as of the date of the filing of this Annual Report, there were and are 13,830,769 Common Shares issued and outstanding.


	•		Holders of the Common Shares have no preemptive, redemption, conversion or sinking fund rights.


	•		Holders of the Common Shares are entitled to one vote per share on all matters submitted to a poll vote of holders of Common Shares and do not have any cumulative voting rights.


	•		In the event of our liquidation, dissolution or winding-up and subject to any alternative resolution that may be pursued by our shareholders, the holders of Common Shares are entitled to share ratably in our assets, if any, remaining after the payment of all our debts and liabilities.


	•		Our outstanding Common Shares are fully paid and nonassessable.


	•		Additional authorized but unissued Common Shares may be issued by the Board without the approval of the shareholders.

The holders of Common Shares will receive such dividends, if any, as may be declared by the Board of Directors out of funds legally available for such purposes. We may not declare or pay a dividend, or make a distribution out of contributed surplus, if there are reasonable grounds for believing that:


	•		we are, or after the payment would be, unable to pay our liabilities as they become due; or


	•		the realizable value of our assets after such payment or distribution would be less than the aggregate amount of our liabilities and our issued share capital and share premium accounts.

The following is a summary of provisions of Bermuda law and our organizational documents, including ~~the~~our memorandum of association and Bye-laws. We refer you to our memorandum of association and Bye-laws, copies of which have been filed with the SEC. You are urged to read these documents in their entirety for a complete understanding of the terms ~~of the memorandum of association and Bye-laws.~~


	~~10.1.3~~	~~Share Capital~~

thereof.

10.2.3 Share Capital

Our authorized capital consists of one class of Common Shares. Under our Bye-laws, our Board of Directors has the power to issue any authorized and unissued shares on such terms and conditions

as it may determine. Any shares or class of shares may be issued with such preferred, deferred, qualified or other special rights or any restrictions with regard to such matters, whether in regard to dividend, voting, ~~special rights,~~ return of capital or otherwise, as we may from time to time by resolution of the shareholders prescribe, or in the absence of such shareholder direction, as the Board of Directors may determine.


	~~10.1.4~~	~~Voting Rights~~

This provision in the Bye-laws could be used to prevent a takeover attempt, or to make a takeover attempt prohibitively expensive, and thereby preclude shareholders from realizing a potential premium over the market value of their shares.

10.2.4 Voting Rights

Generally, under Bermuda law and our Bye-laws, questions brought before a general meeting are decided by a simple majority vote of shareholders present or represented by ~~proxy.~~proxy, with no provision for cumulative voting. Matters will be decided by way of votes cast by way of show of hands unless a poll is demanded.

If a poll is demanded, each shareholder who is entitled to vote and who is present in person or by proxy has one vote for each Common Share entitled to vote on such question. A poll may only be demanded under the Bye-laws by:


	•		the chairman of the meeting;


	•		at least three shareholders present in person or represented by proxy;


	•		any shareholder or shareholders present in person or represented by proxy and holding between them not less than one-tenth of the total voting rights of all shareholders having voting rights; or


	•		a shareholder or shareholders present in person or represented by proxy holding Common Shares conferring the right to vote on which an aggregate sum has been paid up equal to not less than one-tenth of the total sum paid up on all Common Shares.

Unless the Board of Directors otherwise determines, no shareholder shall be entitled to vote at any general meeting unless all calls or other sums presently payable by that shareholder in respect of all shares held by such shareholder have been paid.


	~~10.1.5~~	~~Dividend Rights~~

10.2.5 Dividend Rights

Under Bermuda law, a company may declare and pay dividends unless there are reasonable grounds for believing that the company is, or would, after the payment, be unable to pay its liabilities as they become due or that the realizable value of the company’s assets would thereby be less than the aggregate of its liabilities and issued share capital and share premium accounts.

Under our Bye-laws, ~~each share is entitled to a dividend if, as and when dividends are declared by~~ the Board may from time to time declare dividends or distributions out of ~~Directors.~~contributed surplus to be paid to the shareholders according to their rights and interests. With the sanction of a shareholders resolution, the Board of Directors may determine that any dividend may be paid in cash or by distribution of specific assets, including paid-up shares or debentures of any other company. The Board of Directors may also pay any fixed cash dividend which is payable on any of our Common Shares half-yearly or on other dates, whenever our position, in the opinion of the Board of Directors, justifies such payment.

Dividends, if any, on our Common Shares will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors, and will depend on our future operations and earnings, capital requirements, surplus and general financial condition as our Board of Directors may deem relevant.


	~~10.1.6~~	~~Purchases by a Company of its own Common Shares~~

10.2.6 Purchases by the Company of its own Common Shares

Under Bermuda law and as authorized by the Company’s memorandum of association, we may purchase our own Common Shares out of the capital paid up on the Common Shares in question or out of funds that would otherwise be available for dividend or distribution or out of the proceeds of a fresh issue of Common Shares made for the purposes of the purchase. We may not purchase our shares if, on the date on which the purchase is to be effected, there are reasonable grounds for believing that the Company is, or after the purchase would be, unable to pay its liabilities as they become due.

However, to the extent that any premium is payable on the purchase, the premium must be provided out of the funds of the Company that would otherwise be available for dividend or

distribution or out of athe Company’s share premium account. Any Common Shares purchased by the Company are treated as cancelled and the amount of the Company’s issued capital is diminished by the nominal value of the shares accordingly but shall not be taken as reducing the amount of the Company’s authorized share capital.


	~~10.1.7~~	~~Preemptive Rights~~

10.2.7 Preemptive Rights

Our Bye-laws generally do not provide the holders of our Common Shares preemptive rights in relation to any issues of Common Shares by us or any transfer of our shares.

However, the Company has in the Amended and Restated Shareholders Agreement granted to SOF preemptive rights in the event of any issuance of additional equity securities (or securities convertible into or exchangeable for equity securities) by the Company, such that SOF may subscribe for additional securities in

order to maintain its then percentage ownership interest in the issued and outstanding equity securities of the Company. See ~~Section 3.3.8: ‘‘Obligations~~the risk factor entitled “Obligations under Shareholders Agreement.’’


	~~10.1.8~~	~~Variation of Rights~~

”

10.2.8 Variation of Rights

We may issue more than one class of shares and more than one series of shares in each class. ~~If we have more than one class of shares, the~~The rights attached to any class of shares may be altered or abrogated either:


	•		with the consent in writing of the holders of ~~not less~~more than fifty percent of the issued shares of that class; or


	•		pursuant to a resolution ~~passed at a general meeting~~ of the holders of such ~~shares, voting in proxy or present, at which a quorum is present.~~shares.

The Bye-laws provide that athe necessary quorum ~~for such a meeting~~ shall be two or more persons present in person or by proxy holding shares of the relevant class. The Bye-laws specify that the creation or issuance of shares ranking pari passu with existing shares will not, subject to any statement to the contrary in the terms of issuance of those shares or rights attached to those shares, vary the special rights attached to existing shares.


	~~10.1.9~~	~~Transfer of Common Shares~~

10.2.9 Transfer of Common Shares

Subject to the ~~‘‘Transfer Restrictions’’~~“Transfer Restrictions” section below, a shareholder may transfer title to all or any of his shares by completing an instrument of transfer in the usual common form or in such other form as the Board of Directors may approve. The form of transfer is required to be signed by or on behalf of the transferor and also the transferee where any share is not fully paid. The transferor shall be deemed to remain the holder of the shares until the name of the transferee is entered in the Register of Members.


	~~10.1.10~~	~~Transfer Restrictions~~

~~The Board of Directors may in its absolute discretion and without assigning any reason refuse to register the transfer of any share that is not fully paid.~~

10.2.10 Transfer Restrictions

The Board of Directors may, in its absolute discretion and without assigning any reason therefor, decline to register any transfer of any share which is not a fully paid share. The Board of Directors may also refuse to register an instrument of transfer of a share unless the instrument of transfer:


	•		is duly stamped, if required by law, and lodged with us;


	•		is accompanied by the relevant share certificate and such other evidence of the transferor’s right to make the transfer as the Board of Directors shall reasonably require;


	•		is in respect of one class of shares; and


	•		has obtained, where applicable, permission of the Bermuda Monetary Authority.

Our Common Shares are no longer listed on an ~~‘‘appointed~~“appointed stock ~~exchange’’~~exchange” and, therefore, do not qualify for a ~~‘‘blanket’’~~“blanket” authorization for free transferability from the Bermuda Monetary Authority for all transfers of our Common Shares between persons who are not resident in Bermuda for exchange control purposes. The Bermuda Monetary Authority has informed us that it has no objection to the continued free transferability of our Common Shares on the same basis as when the Company was listed on the NYSE, except that the Bermuda Monetary Authority has requested it be informed of any shareholders holding five percent or more of the Common Shares in issue or any proposals to transfer five percent or more of the issued and outstanding Common Shares.

The Company, together with PEWC and SOF Investments, L.P., ~~has~~ entered into a shareholders agreement dated as of June 28, 2007 (the ~~‘‘Shareholders Agreement’’~~“Shareholders Agreement”) which provides, among other things, for certain transfer restrictions, notice requirements and tag-along rights in the event PEWC wishes to transfer any of its

Common Shares in certain types of transactions. The Shareholders Agreement was amended and restated on March 27, 2009 (the “Amended and Restated Shareholders Agreement”) in connection with the sale by SOF to PEWC of 51% of the Common Shares held by SOF. The Amended and Restated Shareholders Agreement is binding only upon the three parties to that agreement. Under the Amended and Restated Shareholders Agreement, the Company has been granted an extension until February 2011 to achieve a listing of the Common Shares on a national Securities Market and SOF has maintained its right to sell its remaining Common Shares to PEWC in the event the Company is not able to achieve that national listing. See Section ~~4.1.2: ‘‘~~4.3: “Certain Recent ~~Developments.’’~~


	~~10.1.11~~	~~Transmission of Shares~~

Events.”

10.2.11 Transmission of Shares

In the event of the death of a shareholder, the survivor or survivors, where the deceased shareholder was a joint holder, and the estate representative, where hethe deceased shareholder was sole holder, shall be the only persons recognized by us as having any title to the shares of the deceased. ~~‘‘Estate representative’’~~“Estate representative” means the person to whom probate or letters of administration has or have been granted in Bermuda, or failing any such person, such other person as the Board of Directors may in its absolute discretion determine to be the person recognized by us for this purpose.


	~~10.1.12~~	~~Disclosure of Interests~~

10.2.12 Disclosure of Interests

Under the Companies Act, a director who has an interest in a material contract or a proposed material ~~proposed~~ contract, or a 10% or more interest (directly or indirectly) in an entity that is interested in a contract or proposed contract or arrangement with us, is obligated to declare the nature of such interest at the first opportunity at a meeting of the Board of Directors, or by writing to the Board of Directors. If the director has complied with the relevant sections of the Companies Act and the Bye-laws with respect to the disclosure of his interest, the director may vote at a meeting of the Board of Directors or a committee thereof on a contract, transaction or arrangement in which that director is interested, in which case his vote shall be counted and he shall be taken into account in ascertaining whether a quorum is present.


	~~10.1.13~~	~~Rights in Liquidation~~

10.2.13 Rights in Liquidation

Under Bermuda law, in the event of liquidation, dissolution or winding-up of a company, after satisfaction in full of all claims of creditors and subject to the preferential rights accorded to any series of preferred stock, the proceeds of such liquidation, dissolution or winding-up are distributed among the holders of shares in accordance with a company’s bye-laws.

Under our Bye-laws, if we are wound up, the liquidator may, pursuant to a resolution of the shareholders and any approval required by the Companies Act, divide among the shareholders in cash or other assets the whole or part of our assets, whether ~~they~~such assets shall consist of property of the same kind or not, and may for such purposes set such values as hesuch liquidator deems fair upon any property to be divided and may determine how such division shall be carried out as between the shareholders.


	~~10.1.14~~	~~Meetings of Shareholders~~

10.2.14 Meetings of Shareholders

Under Bermuda law, a company is required to convene at least one general meeting per calendar year. The directors of a company, notwithstanding anything in ~~its~~such company’s bye-laws, shall, on the requisition of the shareholders holding at the date of the deposit of the requisition not less than one-tenth of the paid-up capital of the company carrying the right of vote, duly convene a special general meeting.

~~The~~ Our Bye-laws provide that the Board of Directors may, whenever it thinks fit, convene a special general meeting.

Bermuda law requires that shareholders be given at least five days’ notice of a

meeting of the Company. Our Bye-laws extend this period to provide that not less than 20 days’ written notice of a general meeting must

be given to those shareholders entitled to receive such notice. The accidental omission to give notice to or nonreceipt of a notice of a meeting by any person does not invalidate the proceedings of a meeting.

Our Bye-laws state that no business can be transacted at a general meeting unless a quorum of at least two shareholders representing a majority of the issued shares of the Company are present in person or by proxy and entitled to vote.

Under our Bye-laws, notice to any shareholders may be delivered either personally or by sending it through the post, by airmail where applicable, in a pre-paid letter addressed to the shareholder at his address as appearing in the share register or by delivering it to, or leaving it at, such registered address. Any notice sent by post shall be deemed to have been served seven (7) days after dispatch. A notice of a general meeting is deemed to be duly given to the shareholder if it is sent to him by cable, telex or ~~telecopier. Any~~telecopier or other mode of representing or reproducing words in a legible and non-transitory form and such notice shall be deemed to have been served twenty-four (24) hours after its ~~dispatch in the case~~dispatch.

10.2.15 Access to Books and Records and Dissemination of ~~cable, telex or telecopier and seven (7) days after dispatch in the case of notice through the post.~~
~~10.1.15~~ ~~Access to Books and Records and Dissemination of Information~~

Information

Under Bermuda law, members of the general public have the right to inspect the public documents of a company available at the office of the Bermuda Registrar of Companies. These documents include the memorandum of association and any amendment to the memorandum of association.

Under Bermuda law, the minutes of shareholder meetings will be open for inspection by any shareholder or director without charge for not less than two hours during business hours each day, subject to any reasonable restrictions that we may impose. The shareholders shall be entitled to receive a copy of every balance sheet and statement of income and expenditure before a general meeting as required under the Bye-laws.

~~The~~

Under our Bye-laws, the register of shareholders of ~~a company~~the Company is required to be open for inspection between 10:00 a.m. and 12:00 noon each working day without charge ~~and~~ to members of the general ~~public on the payment of a fee.~~public. A company is required to maintain its share register in Bermuda but may, subject to the provisions of the Companies Act, establish a branch register outside of Bermuda. We have established a branch register with our transfer agent, Computershare Limited, which is based in Jersey City, New Jersey.

Under Bermuda law, a company is required to keep at its registered office a register of its directors and officers that is open for inspection for not less than two hours in each day by members of the public without charge. Under our Bye-laws, the register of directors and officers ~~are~~is available for inspection by the public between 10:00 a.m. and 12:00 noon every working day.

Bermuda law does not ~~however,~~ provide a general right for shareholders to inspect or obtain copies of any other corporate ~~records.~~


	~~10.1.16~~	~~Election or Removal of Directors~~

records, except for the Bye-laws of the Company.

10.2.16 Election or Removal of Directors

The Bye-laws provide that the number of directors will be such number, not less than two, as our shareholders by resolution may from time to time determine. A director will serve until re-elected or his successor is appointed at the next annual general meeting or his prior removal in the manner provided by the Companies Act or the Bye-laws.

~~At an annual general meeting~~ There is no requirement under Bermuda law, the Company’s memorandum of ~~shareholders held on December 16, 2004, the Company amended~~association or its Bye-laws ~~to establish~~that a classified board consisting of up to three Class A Directors and up to seven Class B Directors. Each Class A Director and each Class B Director had one vote on any resolution that came before the Board of Directors, and except as specified in the Bye-laws, a simple majority of ~~votes cast by~~ the ~~combined Board of Directors (both Class A and Class B) was sufficient for the adoption of any resolution; provided, however, no resolution could~~Company’s directors be ~~adopted without the approval of at least one of the Class A Directors.~~

independent.

At the annual general meeting held on September 7, 2007, the Company further amended its Bye-laws to delete the provisions establishing a classified ~~board. Further,~~Board. The amendment to the ~~shareholders of the~~

~~Company approved resolutions establishing~~Bye-laws established that the number of ~~directorships at ten members.~~directors would be set by the shareholders, with each director having one vote on all matters submitted to the Board. At that meeting, eight members of the Board of Directors were elected, with two seats

then reserved as casual ~~vacancies. See Section 4.1.2: ‘‘Recent Developments.’’~~

vacancies and subsequently filled by the Board. At the annual general meeting held on September 29, 2009, the ten directors were re-elected.

The shareholders may by resolution determine that one or more vacancies in the Board of Directors shall be deemed casual vacancies for the purposes of the Bye-laws. The Board, so long as a quorum of directors remains in office, shall have the power at any time and from time to time to appoint any individual to be a director so as to fill a casual vacancy. The shareholders may approve the appointment of alternate directors or may authorize the Board to appoint them. Directors may also appoint and remove their own alternates.

We may, in a special general meeting called for this purpose, remove a director, provided notice of such meeting is served upon the director concerned not less than fourteen days before the meeting and he shall be entitled to be heard at that meeting.

The office of a director will be vacated in the event of any of the following:


	•		if he resigns his office by notice in writing to be delivered to our registered office or tendered at a meeting of the Board of Directors;


	•		if he becomes of unsound mind or a patient for any purpose under any statute or applicable law relating to mental health and the Board of Directors resolves that his office is vacated;


	•		if he becomes bankrupt or enters into a general settlement with his creditors;


	•		if he is prohibited by law from being a director; or


	•		if he ceases to be a director by virtue of the Companies Act or is removed from office pursuant to the Bye-laws.


	~~10.1.17~~	~~Amendment of Memorandum of Association and Bye-Laws~~

10.2.17 Amendment of Memorandum of Association and Bye-Laws

Bermuda law provides that the memorandum of association of a company may be amended by resolution passed at a general meeting of which due notice has been given. An amendment to a memorandum of association does not require the consent of the Minister of Finance save for specific circumstances, for example, the adopting of any authority to carry on restricted business activities.

Under Bermuda law, the holders of:


	•		an aggregate of not less than twenty percent in par value of ~~the Company’s~~a company’s issued ~~Common Shares;~~share capital or

		any class thereof; or

	•		not less in the aggregate than twenty percent of the company’s debentures entitled to object to amendments to its memorandum of association,

have the right to apply to the Supreme Court of Bermuda for an annulment of any amendment of the memorandum of association.

Where such an application is made, the amendment becomes effective only to the extent that it is confirmed by the Bermuda Supreme Court. An application for an annulment of an amendment of the memorandum of association must be made within twenty-one days after the date on which the resolution amending the memorandum of association is passed and may be made on behalf of the persons entitled to make the application by one or more of their number as they may appoint in writing for the purpose.

are entitled to object to amendments to its memorandum of association, and have the right to apply to the Supreme Court of Bermuda for an annulment of any amendment of the memorandum of association. Where such an application is made, the amendment becomes effective only to the extent that it is confirmed by the Bermuda Supreme Court. An application for an annulment of an amendment of the memorandum of association must be made within twenty-one days after the date on which the resolution amending the memorandum of association is passed and may be made on behalf of the persons entitled to make the application by one or more of their number as they may appoint in writing for the purpose.

Our Bye-laws may be amended in the manner provided for in the Companies Act, which provides that the directors may amend the Bye-laws, provided that any such amendment shall be effective only to the extent approved by the shareholders.


	~~10.1.18~~	~~Merger or Consolidation (Amalgamation)~~

10.2.18 Merger or Consolidation (Amalgamation)

The Companies Act provides that, subject to the terms of a company’s bye-laws, the merger or consolidation of a Bermuda company with another company (referred to as an “amalgamation” under Bermuda law) requires ~~a merger or consolidation~~an amalgamation agreement which must be approved by the board of directors and at a meeting of the shareholders by seventy-five percent of the shareholders present and entitled to vote at such meeting in respect of which the quorum shall be two persons holding or representing by proxy ~~at least~~more than one-third of the issued shares of the company.

These provisions do not apply where a holding company is amalgamating with one or more of its wholly-owned subsidiaries or where two or more wholly-owned companies of the same holding company are amalgamating.

Under Bermuda law, in the event of ~~a merger or consolidation~~an amalgamation of a Bermuda company, a shareholder who did not vote in favor of the transaction and who is not satisfied that fair value has been offered for the shares, may apply to a Bermuda court within one month of notice of the meeting of shareholders to appraise the fair value of those shares.


	~~10.1.19~~	~~Class Actions and Derivative Actions~~

10.2.19 Class Actions and Derivative Actions

Class actions, ~~and derivative actions~~as they are ~~generally~~commonly understood in the United States, are not available to shareholders under Bermuda law. Derivative actions are generally only available to shareholders under Bermuda law in very limited circumstances. A shareholder may commence an action in the name of a company to remedy a wrong done to the company where the wrongdoers are in control of the company and the act complained of is ~~alleged to be~~of a fraudulent character, oppressive, beyond the corporate power of the company, ~~or is~~ illegal or would result in the violation of the company’s memorandum of association or bye-laws. Furthermore, consideration would be given by a Bermuda court to acts that are alleged to constitute a fraud against the minority shareholders or, for instance, where an act requiringhave required the approval of a greater percentage of the company’s shareholders than those ~~who~~that actually approved it.

A shareholder may not commence such an action where the wrong complained of is capable of ratification by the company in a general meeting by ordinary resolution.

When one or more shareholders believes the affairs of a company are being conducted in a manner which is oppressive or prejudicial to the interest of some of the shareholders, a Bermuda court, upon petition, may make such order as it sees fit, including an order regulating the conduct of the company’s affairs in the future or ordering the purchase of the shares of any shareholders by other shareholders or by the ~~company.~~


	~~10.1.20~~	~~Registrar or Transfer Agent~~

~~Our branch transfer agent~~company, and ~~registrar is Computershare Limited, located at 525 Washington Boulevard, Jersey City, New Jersey 07310. In addition to~~in the case of a ~~register held by our branch transfer agent, a register of holders~~purchase of the shares ~~is maintained~~ by the ~~principal registrar~~company, for the reduction accordingly of the company’s capital or otherwise.

10.2.20 Personal Liability of Directors and ~~transfer agent, Appleby Management (Bermuda) Ltd. in Bermuda located at Argyle House, 41A Cedar Avenue, Hamilton HM 12, Bermuda.~~
~~10.1.21~~ ~~Personal Liability of Directors and Indemnity~~

Indemnity

The Companies Act requires every officer, including directors, of a company in exercising powers and discharging duties, to act honestly in good faith with a view to the best interests of the company, and to exercise the care, diligence and skill that a reasonably prudent person would exercise in comparable circumstances. The Companies Act further provides that any provision, whether in the bye-laws of a company or in any contract between the company and any officer or any person employed by the company as auditor, exempting such officer or person from liability, or indemnifying him against any liability which by virtue of any rule of law would otherwise attach to him, in respect of any fraud or dishonesty of which he may be guilty in relation to the company, shall be void.

Every director, officer and committee member shall be indemnified out of our funds against all civil liabilities, loss, damage or expense including liabilities under contract, tort and statute or any applicable foreign law or regulation and all reasonable legal and other costs and expenses properly payable, incurred or suffered by him as director, officer or committee member; provided that the indemnity contained in the ~~bye-laws~~Bye-laws will not extend to any matter which would render it void under the Companies Act as discussed above.


	~~10.1.22~~	~~Exchange Controls~~

10.2.21 Exchange Controls

We have been designated by the Bermuda Monetary Authority as a non-resident under the Exchange Control Act of 1972 (the ~~‘‘Exchange~~“Exchange Control ~~Act’’~~Act”). This designation allows us to engage in transactions in currencies other than the Bermuda dollar.

The transfer of Common Shares between persons regarded as resident outside Bermuda for exchange control purposes and the issue of Common Shares to such persons may be effected without specific consent under the Exchange Control Act and regulations thereunder, provided that the Bermuda Monetary Authority is promptly notified of all instances in which the Company becomes

aware that a new shareholder has obtained five percent or more of the Company’s shares. Any issues of shares, and any transfers of Common Shares to any person regarded as resident in Bermuda for exchange control purposes, require specific prior approval from the Bermuda Monetary Authority under the Exchange Control Act.

Notwithstanding the recording of any special capacity, we are not bound to investigate or incur any responsibility in respect of the proper administration of any ~~such~~ estate or trust.

We will take no notice of any trust applicable to any of our Common Shares whether or not we had notice of such trust.

As an ~~‘‘exempted~~“exempted company,’’” we are exempt from Bermuda laws which restrict the percentage of share capital that may be held by non-Bermudians. However, as an exempted company we may not participate in certain designated business transactions, which we do not consider relevant to our present or planned business activities.

~~10.2~~

10.3 Material Contracts

Composite Services Agreement

(“CSA”)

The Company engages in transactions in the ordinary course of business with PEWC, including the purchase of certain raw materials and the distribution of PEWC products in various countries in the Asia Pacific region. In 2009 there have been no material changes to the CSA between APWC and PEWC. The Company and PEWC are parties to a composite services agreement dated November 7, 1996 (the ~~‘‘Composite~~“Composite Services ~~Agreement’’~~Agreement”), which the Company has renewed annually, at its option. The Composite Services Agreement contains provisions that define the relationship and the conduct of the respective businesses of the Company and PEWC and confers certain preferential benefits on the Company. Pursuant to the Composite Services Agreement:


	•		PEWC agrees to (a) sell copper rod to the Company, upon the Company’s request, (i) at a price consisting of the spot price of copper on the LME plus an agreed upon premium and (ii) at prices and on terms at least as favorable as PEWC provides copper rod to other purchasers of similar amounts of copper rod in the same markets, and (b) give priority in the supply of copper rod to the Company over other purchasers of copper rod from PEWC.


	•		The Company has the right to distribute any wire or cable product manufactured by PEWC in all markets in which the Company presently distributes or develops the capability to distribute in the future such products on such terms as have historically been in effect or on terms at least as favorable as PEWC grants to third parties that distribute such products in such markets. However, PEWC is not required to grant to the Company the right to distribute products manufactured by PEWC in the future in markets where the Company does not currently have the capability to distribute unless and until PEWC has no pre-existing contractual rights which would conflict with the grant of such right to the Company.


	•		Each of PEWC and the Company will notify the other party prior to entering into any negotiations with a third party concerning the establishment of any facility or similar venture to manufacture or

distribute any wire or cable product outside of the markets where the Company currently manufactures or distributes, or intends to develop the capability to manufacture or distribute, any wire or cable product. Unless the Company and PEWC mutually agree otherwise, the Company has the right of first refusal to enter into any definitive agreement with such third party. If, however, such third party would not agree to the substitution of the Company for PEWC or such substitution would prevent the successful completion of the facility or venture, PEWC has agreed ~~t o~~to arrange for the Company to participate to the extent possible.


	•		PEWC agrees to make available to the Company, upon the Company’s request and on terms to be mutually agreed between PEWC and the Company from time to time, certain services with respect to the design and manufacture of wire and cable products, computerization, inventory control, purchasing, internal auditing, quality control, emergency back-up services, and recruitment and training of personnel; such services may include the training of the Company’s employees and managers at PEWC facilities and the secondment of PEWC employees and managers to the Company.


	•		Without the consent of the Company, PEWC will not compete with respect to the manufacture or distribution of wire and cable products in any market in which the Company is manufacturing or has taken significant steps to commence manufacturing.


	•		For purposes of the Composite Services Agreement, each province in China is considered the equivalent of a country.

To the extent that transactions occur in the future between the Company and PEWC or affiliates of PEWC other than under the Composite Services Agreement, such transactions will be entered into on an arm’s length basis on terms no less favorable than those available from unaffiliated third parties.

Indemnification Agreement

The Company and PEWC are parties to an indemnification agreement dated November 6, 1996 (the ~~‘‘Indemnification Agreement’’~~“Indemnification Agreement”), pursuant to which PEWC agreed to indemnify the Company (including the Company’s directors, officers, employees and agents) against any cost, expense, loss, liability or damage arising out of any claim asserted or threatened to be asserted by any third party as a result of certain actions taken or failed to be taken by PEWC or its subsidiaries (other than the Company) prior to March 1997 with respect to Sigma Cable, Sino-Sin Trading Co. Ltd., APEC, Siam Pacific, Siam Pacific Holding Company, Pacific Thai, Charoong Thai and NPC, following the exercise by the Company of its option to purchase, directly or indirectly, each of them (collectively, the ~~‘‘Transferred Businesses’’~~“Transferred Businesses”). PEWC has a duty to indemnify the Company if such cost, expense, loss, liability or damage ~~aris es~~arises out of claims resulting from the actions or inactions of PEWC or its subsidiaries, with respect to the Transferred Businesses, to the extent such action or failure to act was not in compliance with applicable laws and regulations or obligations to third parties and, with respect to Charoong Thai, is limited to situations of which PEWC had knowledge.

Amended and Restated Shareholders Agreement

In connection with the acquisition by SOF of all of the Common Shares previously held by Sino-JP, the Company, PEWC and SOF entered into a shareholders agreement dated as of June 28, 2007 (the ~~‘‘Shareholders Agreement’’~~“Shareholders Agreement”), pursuant to which the Company granted to SOF certain rights and protections. Under the Shareholders Agreement, the Company ~~has~~ agreed to indemnify SOF, and its partners and certain of its affiliates (the ~~‘‘SOF~~“SOF Indemnified ~~Persons’’~~Persons”), for any additional taxes, interest, penalties and other costs that might be imposed upon or incurred by the SOF Indemnified Persons in the event that the Company is determined by the Internal Revenue Service (the ~~‘‘IRS’’~~“IRS”) to be a ~~‘‘controlled~~“controlled foreign ~~corporation’’~~corporation” (a ~~‘‘CFC’’~~“CFC”) or a ~~‘‘passive~~“passive foreign investment ~~company’’~~company” (a ~~‘‘PFIC’’~~“PFIC”) as such terms are interpreted and defined under IRS rules or regulations.

~~10.3 Environmental Matters~~

The Company believes that all of its operations are in compliance with, and in certain circumstances exceed, all applicable environmental laws and regulations in Thailand, Singapore, Australia and China. The Company has not been subject to any legal, regulatory or other action alleging violations or breaches of environmental standards. While In addition, under the Shareholders Agreement, the Company ~~does not believe that~~granted to SOF certain registration rights with respect to the ~~nature~~Common Shares owned by it, including the undertaking by the Company to prepare and file a

shelf registration statement, and the further right of SOF to exercise two demand registration rights with regard to its ~~operations creates environmental hazards, no assurance can be given that new environmental laws or regulations~~Common Shares and to further exercise certain piggyback registration rights in ~~Thailand, Singapore, Australia, China or elsewhere, will not,~~connection with its Common Shares. The Shareholders Agreement was amended and restated on March 27, 2009 (the “Amended and Restated Shareholders Agreement”) in ~~the future, require changes in the Company’s production processes or otherwise adversely affect the Company’s operations and financial condition.~~

~~10.4 Insurance~~

The Company maintains insurance policies covering certain buildings, machinery and equipment against specified amounts of damage or loss caused by fire, flooding, other natural disasters and burglary and theft. The Company does not carry insurance for consequential loss arising from business interruptions or political disturbances and does not carry product liability insurance. The Company believes that it maintains insurance coverage commensurateconnection with the ~~nature~~sale by SOF to PEWC of 51% of the Common Shares held by SOF. See Item 7: “Major Shareholders and ~~risks associated with its business.~~

Related Party Transactions.”

10.4 Taxation

~~10.5 Credit Support~~

~~10.6 Taxation~~

The following is a summary of ~~certain~~the material tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of Common Shares based on the tax laws of the United States and ~~Bermuda.~~Bermuda, subject to the assumptions, qualifications and limitations in our discussion below. Such summary is subject to changes in United States and Bermuda law, including changes that could have retroactive effect. The following summary does not take into account the individual circumstances of an investor, nor does it purport to be a complete technical analysis or examination of all potential tax effects relevant to a decision to purchase Common Shares, including without limitation, the tax laws of the various states within the United States.


	~~10.6.1~~	~~United States Taxation~~

10.4.1 United States Taxation

The following is a summary of ~~certain~~the material United States federal income tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of Common Shares by a U.S. Holder (as defined below) and a Non-U.S. Holder (as defined below)., in each case, subject to the assumptions, qualifications and limitations in our discussion below. Such summary is subject to changes in United States law, including changes that could have retroactive effect. The summary does not purport to be a comprehensive description of all possible tax considerations that may be relevant to a decision to purchase Common Shares. This summary is based upon the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the ~~‘‘Code’’~~“Code”), regulations promulgated under the Code by the U.S. Treasury Department (the ~~‘‘Treasury’’~~“Treasury”) (including proposed and temporary regulations), rulings, current administrative interpretations and official pronouncements of the ~~Internal Revenue Service (the ‘‘IRS’’),~~IRS, and judicial decisions, all as currently in effect and all of which are subject to differing interpretations or to change, possibly with retroactive effect. Such change could materially and adversely affect the tax consequences described below. No assurance can be given that the IRS would not assert, or that a court would not sustain, a position contrary to any of the tax consequences described below. Further, this summary does not discuss any foreign, state or local tax consequences.

In particular, this summary deals only with Common Shares held as capital assets and does not address the United States tax treatment of U.S. Holders and Non-U.S. Holders that are subject to special treatment under the Code, such as dealers in stocks, securities, or currencies, traders in securities that elect to use a mark-to-market method of accounting for their securities holdings, financial institutions, insurance companies, tax-exempt entities, real estate investment trusts, regulated investment companies, qualified retirement plans, individual retirement accounts, and other tax deferred accounts, expatriates of the United States, persons subject to the alternative minimum tax, persons holding shares as part of a hedging or conversion transaction or a straddle, or other integrated transaction, persons who acquired Common Shares pursuant to the exercise of any employee stock option or otherwise as compensation for services, or persons whose functional ~~curren cy~~currency is not the United States dollar or who own (directly, indirectly or by attribution) 10% or more of the stock of the Company. Consequently, prospective purchasers who are U.S. Holders or Non-U.S. Holders are advised to satisfy themselves as to the overall United States federal, state, local and foreign tax consequences of their acquisition, ownership and disposition of Common Shares by consulting their own tax advisors.

As used herein, the term ~~‘‘U.S. Holder’’~~“U.S. Holder” means a beneficial owner of Common Shares that is (i) a citizen or resident of the United States, (ii) a corporation ~~or partnership~~(including any entity treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes) created or organized in the United States or under the laws of the United States or any state (or the District of Columbia), (iii) an estate, the income of which is subject to United States federal

income tax regardless of its source, or (iv) a trust, if a court within the United States is able to exercise primary supervision over the administration of the trust and one or more ~~‘‘United~~“United States ~~persons’’~~persons” (as defined in Section 7701(a)(30) of the Code) has the authority to control all substantial decisions of the trust.

The term ~~‘‘Non-U.S. Holder’’~~“Non-U.S. Holder” means a beneficial owner of Common Shares that is not a U.S. Holder. As described in ~~‘‘Taxation~~“Taxation of Non-U.S. ~~Holders’’~~Holders” below, the consequences to a Non-U.S. Holder may differ substantially from the tax consequences to a U.S. Holder.

If a partnership (including for this purpose any entity treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes) is a beneficial owner of Common Shares, the U.S. federal income tax consequences to a partner in the partnership will generally depend on the status of the partner and the activities of the partnership. A holder of Common Shares that is a partnership and the partners in such partnership should consult their own tax advisors regarding the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the ownership and disposition of Common Shares.

Taxation of U.S. Holders

The discussion in ~~‘‘Taxation~~“Taxation of ~~Dividends’’~~Dividends” and ~~‘‘Taxation~~“Taxation of Capital ~~Gains’’~~Gains” below assumes that the Company will not be treated as a ~~passive foreign investment company (‘‘PFIC’’)~~PFIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes. For a discussion of the rules that apply if the Company is treated as a PFIC, see the discussion in ~~‘‘Passive~~“Passive Foreign Investment ~~Company’’~~Company” below.

Taxation of Dividends

We have never declared or paid any cash dividends and do not presently anticipate paying dividends in 2010. A U.S. Holder receiving a distribution with respect to Common Shares generally will be required to include such distribution in gross income (as ordinary income subject to regular, and not reduced, tax rates) on the day received as foreign-source dividend income to the extent such distribution is paid from the Company’s current or accumulated earnings and profits (as determined under United States federal income tax principles). Such dividends will not be eligible for the dividends received deduction (generally allowed to certain United States corporations in respect of dividends received from United States corporations). U.S. Holders that are corporations and directly own 10% or more of the voting stock of the Company may be entitled to claim a foreign tax credit for United States federal income tax purposes in respect of foreign taxes paid by the Company and certain subsidiaries.

The Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2003 (P.L. 108-27, 117 Stat. 752) (the ‘‘2003 Act’’) was enacted on May 28, 2003. Subject to certain limitations, the 2003 Act generally provides that

Under U.S. federal income tax laws, for taxable years beginning before January 1, 2011, a dividend paid to an individual U.S. shareholder from either a domestic corporation or a ~~‘‘qualified~~“qualified foreign ~~corporation’’~~corporation” is subject to tax at the reduced rates applicable to certain capital ~~gains (15%; 5% for taxpayers in the lower bracket; 0% for lower bracket taxpayers in 2008).~~gains. A qualified foreign corporation includes certain foreign corporations that are eligible for benefits of a comprehensive income tax treaty with the United States which the Secretary of the Treasury determines is satisfactory for purposes of this provision and which includes an exchange of information program. In addition, a foreign corporation not otherwise treated as a qualified foreign corporation is so treated with respect to any dividend it pays if the stock with respect to which it pays such dividend is readily tradable on an established securities market in the United States.

In the absence of a comprehensive income tax treaty between the United States and Bermuda, the Company will not be treated as a ~~‘‘qualified~~“qualified foreign ~~corporation’’~~corporation” under the treaty test. So long as the Company is not a PFIC (as discussed below), dividends paid by the Company to individual shareholders would qualify for these reduced rates if its stock was treated as readily tradable on an established securities market in the United States.

In Notice 2003-71, 2003-2 C.B. 922, the IRS determined that common or ordinary stock, or an American depositary receipt in respect of such stock, is considered readily tradable on an established securities market in the United States if it is listed on a national securities exchange that is registered under Section 6 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78f) or on the Nasdaq Stock Market. As stated in the SEC’s

Annual Report for 2002, registered national exchanges as of September 30, 2002 include the American Stock Exchange (now known as NYSE Amex Equities), the Boston Stock Exchange, the Cincinnati Stock Exchange, the Chicago Stock Exchange, the NYSE, the Philadelphia Stock Exchange, and the Pacific Exchange, Inc.

The notice further provided, however, that the Treasury and the IRS were continuing to consider, for subsequent years, the treatment of dividends with respect to stock listed only in a manner that did

not meet this definition, such as on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board (the ~~‘‘OTC BB’’~~“OTC BB”) or on the electronic Pink Sheets. In particular, the notice indicated that the Treasury and the IRS were considering whether or to what extent treatment of stock that was listed only in such manner as ~~‘‘readily~~“readily tradable on an established securities market in the United ~~States’’~~States” should be conditioned on the satisfaction of parameters regarding minimum trading volume, minimum number of market makers, maintenance and publication of historical trade or quotation data, issuer reporting requirements under SEC or exchange rules, or issuer disclosure or determinations regarding PFIC status. The IRS has not yet provided further guidance on whether or in what circumstances, a company like the Company, which is traded on the OTC BB, will be treated as a qualified foreign corporation. Should the Company be relisted on a registered national exchange, any dividends paid by the Company ~~s hould~~should qualify for the reduced rates referred to above.

To the extent any distribution exceeds the current and accumulated earnings and profits of the Company for a taxable year, the distribution will be treated as a non-taxable return of capital to the extent of the U.S. Holder’s adjusted tax basis in the Common Shares with respect to which the distribution is made, causing a reduction in the adjusted basis of the Common Shares (thereby increasing the amount of gain, or decreasing the amount of loss, to be recognized by the U.S. Holder on a subsequent disposition of the Common Shares). To the extent such distribution exceeds the U.S. Holder’s adjusted tax basis in the Common Shares, such excess will be treated as capital gain.

Taxation of Capital Gains

A U.S. Holder will recognize taxable gain or loss on any sale, exchange or other disposition of Common Shares (including a liquidation, dissolution or as a result of a non-pro rata redemption of Common Shares that qualified for treatment as a sale or exchange for United States federal income tax purposes) in an amount equal to the difference between the amount realized for the Common Shares and the U.S. Holder’s adjusted tax basis in the Common Shares. Such gain or loss generally will be treated as capital gain or loss and will be long-term capital gain or loss if the Common Shares have been held for more than one year on the date of the sale, exchange or other disposition thereof, and will be short-term capital gain or loss if the Common Shares have been held for one year or less on the date of the sale or exchange thereof. Any gain recognized by a U.S. Holder generally will be treated as United States source income. In general, an individual’s ~~long - -term~~short-term capital gains are taxable as ordinary income and an individual’s long-term capital gains are subject to U.S. federal income tax at a marginal rate of 15%, or 5% in the case of individuals in the 10% or 15% income tax brackets. (If an individual is subject to the ‘‘alternative minimum tax’’, the maximum effective tax rate on long-term capital gains will be 26% to 28%).

preferential rates.

Long-term capital gains of corporations generally are subject to the U.S. federal income tax at a current maximum marginal rate of 35%. Short-term capital gain generally is taxable at ordinary income rates. Although capital gains of corporations currently are taxed at the same rates as ordinary income, the distinction between capital gain and ordinary income or loss is relevant for purposes of, among other things, limitations on the deductibility of capital losses. Corporations may deduct capital losses only to the extent of capital gains and generally may carry back capital losses to each of the preceding three years and carry forward capital losses to each of the succeeding five years. Individuals may deduct capital losses to the extent of capital gains plus up to $3,000 ($1,500 for married individuals filing separate returns) and may carry forward ~~long-term~~ capital losses indefinitely.

Backup Withholding

In general, information reporting requirements may be applicable to dividend payments (or other taxable distributions) made in respect of Common Shares to non-corporate U.S. Holders, and ~~‘‘backup withholding’’~~“backup withholding” at the rate of 28% (which rate is scheduled to increase to 31% after 2010) will apply to such payments (i) if the

holder or beneficial owner fails to provide a taxpayer identification number in the manner required by U.S. law and applicable regulations, (ii) if the IRS notifies the payor that the taxpayer identification number furnished by the holder or beneficial owner is incorrect, (iii) if there has been notification from the IRS of a failure by the holder or beneficial owner to report all interest or dividends required to be shown on its United States federal income tax returns or (iv) in certain circumstances, if the holder or beneficial owner fails to comply with applicable certification requirements. In general, payment of the proceeds from a

sale of Common Shares to or through a United States office of a broker is subject to both United States backup withholding and information reporting unless the holder or beneficial owner establishes an exemption. U.S. Holders who are required to establish their exempt status generally must provide such certification on IRS Form W-9. Amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules may be credited against a holder’s tax liability, and a holder may obtain a refund of any excess amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules by timely filing the appropriate claim for refund with the IRS. Payment of the proceeds from the sale of Common Shares effected outside the United States by a foreign office of certain United States connected brokers will not be subject to backup withholding tax but will be subject to information reporting requirements unless the broker has documentary evidence in its records that the beneficial owner is a non-U.S. Holder and has no actual knowledge to the contrary, or the ~~ben eficial~~beneficial owner otherwise establishes an exemption.

Passive Foreign Investment Company

In general, the Company will be treated as a PFIC for United States federal income tax purposes for any taxable year if either (i) at least 75% of the gross income of the Company is passive income or (ii) at least 50% of the value (determined on the basis of a quarterly average) of the Company’s assets is attributable to assets that produce or are held for the production of passive income. The Company believes, based on its current operations and assets, that it is not a PFIC and does not expect to become a PFIC in the future. This conclusion is a factual determination based on, among other things, a valuation of the Company’s assets, which will likely change from time to time.

If the Company were a PFIC for any taxable year during which a U.S. Holder held Common Shares, the U.S. Holder would be subject to special tax rules with respect to (i) any ~~‘‘excess distribution’’~~“excess distribution” by the Company to the U.S. Holder (generally any distribution received by the U.S. Holder in a taxable year that is greater than 125% of the average annual distribution received by the U.S. Holder in the three preceding taxable years, or the U.S. Holder’s holding period for the Common Shares, if shorter) and (ii) any gain realized on the sale or other disposition (including a pledge) of Common Shares.

Under these special tax rules, (i) the excess distribution or gain would be allocated ratably over the U.S. Holder’s holding period for the Common Shares, (ii) the amount allocated to the U.S. Holder’s current taxable year and to any period prior to the first taxable year in which the Company was a PFIC would be includible as ordinary income in the U.S. Holder’s current taxable year and (iii) the amount allocated to a prior year during which the Company was a PFIC would be subject to tax at the highest tax rate in effect for that year, and an interest charge would also be imposed with respect to the resulting tax attributable to each such prior year. The interest charge is computed using the applicable rates imposed on underpayments of United States federal income tax for the relevant periods.

The above rules will not apply if a ~~‘‘mark-to-market’’~~“mark-to-market” election is available and a U.S. Holder validly makes such an election by filing a properly completed IRS Form 8621. If such election were made, a U.S. Holder generally would be required to take into account the difference, if any, between the fair market value and its adjusted tax basis in the Common Shares at the end of each taxable year as ordinary income or ordinary loss (to the extent of any net mark-to-market gains previously included in income). A U.S. Holder’s tax basis in the Common Shares would be adjusted to reflect any such income or loss amount. In addition, any gain from a sale, exchange or other disposition of the Common Shares would be treated as ordinary income, and any loss would be treated as ordinary loss (to the extent of any net mark-to-market gains previously included in income). A mark-to-market election is available to a U.S. Holder only if the Common ~~Sh ares~~Shares are considered ~~‘‘marketable stock’’~~“marketable stock” for these purposes. Generally, shares of a PFIC will be considered marketable stock if they are ~~‘‘regularly traded’’~~“regularly traded” on a ~~‘‘qualified exchange’’~~“qualified exchange” within the meaning of applicable U.S. Treasury regulations.

A class of shares is regularly traded during any calendar year during which such class of shares is traded, other than in de minimis quantities, on at least 15 days during each calendar quarter. A ~~‘‘qualified exchange’’~~“qualified exchange” is defined to include a national securities exchange registered with the SEC or certain foreign exchanges. The Common Shares are not currently traded on a national securities exchange or a qualifying foreign exchange. Accordingly, the mark-to-market election under these rules will not currently be available.

The special tax rules described above will also not apply to a U.S. Holder if the U.S. Holder elects to have the Company treated as a ~~‘‘qualified~~“qualified electing ~~fund’’~~fund” (a ~~‘‘QEF election’’~~“QEF election”) and the Company provides certain information to U.S. Holders. If the Company is treated as a PFIC, it will notify the U.S. Holders and provide such holders with the information necessary to make an effective QEF election, including information as to the procedures for making such an election. The QEF election is made on a shareholder-by-shareholder basis and can ordinarily be revoked only with the consent of the IRS.

A U.S. Holder that makes a valid QEF election will be currently taxable on its pro rata share of the Company’s ordinary earnings and net capital gain (at ordinary income and capital gains rates, respectively) for each taxable year that the Company is classified as a PFIC, regardless of whether distributions are received. Thus, the U.S. Holder may recognize taxable income without receiving any cash to pay its tax liability with respect to such income. The U.S. Holder’s basis in the Common Shares will be increased to reflect taxed but undistributed income. Distributions of income that have been previously taxed will result in a corresponding reduction of basis in the Common Shares and will not be taxed again as a distribution to the U.S. Holder.

A U.S. Holder owning Common Shares during any year that the Company is a PFIC must file IRS Form 8621. U.S. Holders should consult their tax advisors concerning the United States federal income tax consequences of holding Common Shares and of making a mark-to-market or QEF election if the Company is treated as a PFIC in the future.

Controlled Foreign Corporation

A non-U.S. corporation generally will be a ~~controlled foreign corporation (a ‘‘CFC’’)~~CFC for U.S. tax purposes if United States shareholders collectively own more than 50 percent of the total combined voting power or total value of the corporation’s stock on any day during any taxable year. For this purpose, United States shareholders are limited to those U.S. persons who own, directly, indirectly or constructively, 10 percent or more of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock of the non-U.S. corporation. In general, if a corporation is a CFC, then, for each tax year, its United States shareholders will be required to recognize on a current basis their respective shares of the CFC’s ~~‘‘subpart~~“subpart F ~~income’’~~income” and income from investments in certain types of U.S. property (limited, however, to their respective shares of the CFC’s earnings and profits, as computed for U.S. tax purposes, for ~~su ch~~such tax year) even if the income has not been distributed to the shareholders in the form of dividends or otherwise. Subpart F income consists of certain specified categories of income including, among others, dividends, interest, rents, royalties, net gains from the sale of property giving rise to such income and income from certain types of transactions involving ~~‘‘related persons’’~~“related persons” as defined for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Income from investments in certain types of U.S. property to be included by United States shareholders on a current basis includes, among others, income from tangible property physically located in the U.S., income from stock of U.S. domestic corporations, and income from any right to ~~sue~~use a patent or copyright in the U.S. ~~The Company should not currently qualify as a CFC.~~

Taxation of Non-U.S. Holders

Taxation of Dividends

Subject to the discussion in ~~‘‘Backup Withholding’’~~“Backup Withholding” below, Non-U.S. Holders generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax, including withholding tax, on distributions received on Common Shares, unless the distributions are effectively connected with a trade or business conducted in the United States (and, if an applicable income tax treaty so requires, attributable to a permanent establishment maintained in the United States).

If distributions are effectively connected with a U.S. trade or business (and, if applicable, attributable to a U.S. permanent establishment), Non-U.S. Holders generally will be subject to tax on such distributions in the same manner as U.S. Holders, as described in ~~‘‘Taxation~~“Taxation of U.S. Holders — Taxation of ~~Dividends’’~~Dividends” above. In addition, any such distributions received by a corporate Non-U.S.

Holder may also, under certain circumstances, be subject to an additional ~~‘‘branch~~“branch profits ~~tax’’~~tax” at a 30% rate or such lower rate as may be specified by an applicable income tax treaty.

Taxation of Capital Gains

Subject to the discussion in ~~‘‘Backup Withholding’’~~“Backup Withholding” below, Non-U.S. Holders generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax, including withholding tax, on any gain recognized on a sale or other taxable disposition of Common Shares, unless (i) the gain is effectively connected with a trade or business conducted in the United States (and, if an applicable income tax treaty so requires, attributable to a permanent establishment maintained in the United States), or (ii) a Non-U.S. Holder is an individual and is present in the United States for at least 183 days in the taxable year of the disposition, and certain other conditions are present.

If a Non-U.S. Holder meets the test in clause (i) above, such Non-U.S. Holder generally will be subject to tax on any gain that is effectively connected with his conduct of a trade or business in the United States in the same manner as a U.S. Holder, as described in ~~‘‘Taxation~~“Taxation of U.S. Holders — Taxation of Capital ~~Gains’’~~Gains” above. Effectively connected gain realized by a corporate Non-U.S. Holder may also, under certain circumstances, be subject to an additional ~~‘‘branch~~“branch profits ~~tax’’~~tax” at a 30% rate or such lower rate as may be specified by an applicable income tax treaty.

If a Non-U.S. Holder meets the test in clause (ii) above, such Non-U.S. Holder generally will be subject to tax at a 30% rate on the amount by which his U.S. source capital gain exceeds his U.S. source capital loss.

Backup Withholding

Payments to Non-U.S. Holders of distributions on, or proceeds from the disposition of, Common Shares are generally exempt from information reporting and backup withholding. However, a Non-U.S. Holder may be required to establish that exemption by providing certification of non-U.S. status on an appropriate IRS Form W-8.

Backup withholding is not an additional tax. Amounts withheld as backup withholding from a payment to a Non-U.S. Holder may be credited against his U.S. federal income tax liability and a Non-U.S. Holder may obtain a refund of any excess amounts withheld by filing the appropriate claim for refund with the IRS and furnishing any required information in a timely manner.


	~~10.6.2~~	~~Bermuda Taxation~~

10.4.2 Bermuda Taxation

In the opinion of Appleby, the following discussion correctly describes ~~certain~~the material tax consequences of the ownership of Common Shares under Bermuda ~~law.~~

law, subject to the assumptions, qualifications and limitations in the discussion below. Such summary is subject to changes in Bermuda law, including changes that could have retroactive effect.

Under current Bermuda law, there are no taxes on profits, income or dividends nor is there any capital gains tax. Furthermore, the Company has received from the Minister of Finance of Bermuda under the Exempted Undertakings Tax Protection Act of 1966, as amended, an undertaking that, in the event that Bermuda enacts any legislation imposing tax computed on profits or income, or computed on any capital asset, gain or appreciation, or any tax in the nature of estate duty or inheritance tax, then the imposition of any such tax shall not be applicable to the Company or to any of its operations, or the shares, debentures or other obligations of the Company, until March 28, 2016. This undertaking does not, however, prevent the

imposition of any such tax or duty on such persons as are ordinarily resident in Bermuda and holding such shares, debentures or obligations of the Company or of property taxes on Company-owned real property or leasehold interests in ~~Be rmuda.~~

Bermuda.

As an exempted company, the Company must pay to the Bermuda government an annual registration fee calculated on a sliding-scale basis by reference to its assessable capital, that is, its authorized share capital plus any share premium.

There is no stamp duty or other transfer tax payable upon the transfer of shares in the Company by shareholders.

The United States does not have a comprehensive income tax treaty with Bermuda.

~~10.7~~10.5 Documents on Display

We are required to comply with the reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the ~~‘‘Exchange Act’’~~“Exchange Act”), applicable to a foreign private issuer. We are currently required to file annually a Form 20-F no later than six months after the close of our fiscal year, which is December ~~31st.~~31. Any time the Company is delinquent in filing timely any periodic reports, including an Annual Report on Form 20-F, with the SEC, that delinquency may adversely affect the Company’s status on any exchange or quotation service on which its shares are listed or quoted and the Company may not be entitled to use certain abbreviated registration statements with the SEC in connection with the registration of any of its securities. We have previously been delinquent in filing our annual reports. As a result, the Company was delisted from the OTC BB and traded on the Pink Sheets. On April 9, 2008, trading in the Common Shares of the Company was restored to the OTC BB under the trading symbol ~~‘‘AWRCF.’’~~

“AWRCF.”

As a foreign private issuer, we are exempt from the rules under the Exchange Act prescribing the furnishing and content of proxy statements, and our officers, directors and principal shareholders are exempt from the reporting and short-swing profit recovery provisions contained in Section 16 of the Exchange Act.

Our reports and other information, when so filed, may be inspected and copied (at prescribed rates) at the public reference facilities maintained by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the ~~‘‘SEC’’~~“SEC”) at Judiciary Plaza, 100 F Street, N.E., Washington D.C. 20549. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information. In addition, the SEC maintains a web site that contains information filed electronically with the SEC, which can be accessed over the Internet at http://www.sec.gov.

We have filed all our reports electronically since November 4, 2002. Such reports can be accessed over the Internet at http://www.sec.gov.

In addition, we post certain information regarding the Company and its operations on our website located ~~at:~~at www.apwcc.com. Summary information regarding the Company posted on our website should not be considered to be a substitute for, or a restatement of, the more complete information regarding the Company, its results of operations and financial condition set forth in this Annual Report or other documents or information which we may file with the SEC.

Item 11: Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market ~~Risk~~

~~Our~~Risks

The Company has exposure to ~~financial~~several quantitative market risks, ~~derives primarily from~~including fluctuations in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates and the ~~changes in~~pricing of commodities, principally copper, the Company’s main raw material. Risk management measures undertaken by the Company include entering into derivative agreements covering interest rates, foreign exchange rates and copper pricing, as well as copper forward pricing agreements. The Company does not purchase or sell derivative instruments for trading purposes. The Company does not engage in trading activities involving copper contracts for which a lack of marketplace quotations would necessitate the use of fair value estimation techniques.

11.1 Interest Rate Risk

The company has not entered nor used any derivative instruments to manage interest rate exposure. As in our line of business, derivative instrument would normally apply to hedging commodity, i.e., copper, and not the ~~commodity price of our primary raw material, copper.~~

~~11.1~~interest rate hedging as we have seen in other practice.

11.2 Foreign Currency ~~Exposure~~

~~Changes~~Risk

The Company has exposure to fluctuations in currency exchange ~~rates influence the Company’s results of operations.~~rates. The Company’s revenues are generated primarily in the local currency in its principal ~~operations and sales are located in~~operating jurisdictions; namely Thailand, China, Singapore and ~~China and a substantial portion of its revenues are denominated in Baht, Singapore dollars or Chinese Renminbi. Nearly~~Australia. However, nearly all of the ~~raw materials for these operations are imported and paid for in U.S. dollars and a substantial portion~~costs associated with the purchase of the Company’s ~~future~~raw materials, including copper, and its capital expenditures, ~~are expected to be in U.S. dollars. The Company requires a significant amount of U.S. dollars for its~~including ongoing equipment upgrade and maintenance ~~programs. Although~~programs, are in U.S. dollars. In order to limit the ~~Company’s reporting~~risks that would otherwise result from changes in currency ~~is U.S. dollars,~~exchange rates, the ~~functional~~Company enters into derivative financial instruments on a selective basis from time to time which are forward exchange contracts that are cash flow hedges intended to hedge the currency fluctuations relating to sales revenues generated in the local markets of its Singapore operations, which accounted for approximately 9.4% of Company sales (including sales of Distributed Products) in 2007, is the Singapore dollar, the functional currency of its Thai operations, which accounted for approximately 48.8% of Company sales in 20 07, is the Baht, and the functional currency of its Chinese operations, which accounted for approximately 30.9% of Company sales in 2007, is the Renminbi. Accordingly, any devaluation of the Baht, or the Singapore dollar or the Chinese Renminbi against the U.S. dollar increases the effective cost of foreign manufacturing equipment and the amountour operating subsidiaries. The fair value of foreign currency ~~denominated expenses and liabilities and has an adverse impact~~contracts represents the amount required to enter into offsetting contracts with similar remaining maturities based upon quoted market prices. The company as a whole did not enter into any forward contract in 2009. At December 31 2008, the net unrealized loss on the net foreign currency contracts was $133,000. In general, significant volatility in foreign currency exchanges rates will increase the risks to the Company’s results, which we attempt to mitigate through cash flow hedging with forward exchange contracts.

As the Company’s operating subsidiaries incur operating costs in the local currency where they operate, the Company believes it is prudent that those operating subsidiaries incur indebtedness in the local currency when debt financing is necessary. The amount of indebtedness incurred by our operating subsidiaries from time to time is a function of our business strategy, the attractiveness of borrowing as opposed to other methods of financing operations and tax implications, among other considerations. The Company has exposure to currency exchange risk when the results of its operating subsidiaries are translated from the local currency into the U.S. dollar. At December 31, 2009 and 2008, the cumulative other comprehensive gain (loss) account included in the total equity section of the ~~Company.~~

~~We have~~consolidated balance sheet included a cumulative gain (loss) of $3.1 m and ($9.0 million), respectively. This sensitivity analysis is inherently limited in that it assumes that multiple foreign currencies will always move in the same direction and to the same degree relative to the U.S. dollar.

In 2008 we entered into derivative financial instruments on a selective basis throughout the year to mitigate foreign currency fluctuation risks arising from operating activities. The application of these

instruments iswas primarily for currency hedging purposes and not for trading purposes. The Company uses Thai Baht forward foreign exchange contracts to reduce its exposure to foreign currency risk for liabilities denominated in foreign currency. A forward foreign exchange contract obligates the Company to exchange predetermined amounts of specified foreign currencies at specified exchange rates on specified dates or to make an equivalent U.S. dollar payment equal to the value of such exchange. Realized and unrealized gains and losses on foreign exchange contracts are included in income as foreign exchange gains or losses.

The Company entered into forward exchange contracts with a notional value of approximately ~~$1.8 million that matured in March and April 2007 and~~ $12 million that matured in January, February, March, May and June ~~2008.~~

~~11.2 Interest Rate Risk~~

~~The Company’s exposure to market rate risk for changes~~2008 and $19 million that matured in ~~interest rates relates primarily to the Company’s bank loans~~January, February, March and ~~overdrafts, long-term debt and interest-bearing long-term loans from PEWC.~~May 2009. The Company ~~maintains a mixture of both fixed and floating debt instruments. Interest paid totaled $7.2 million~~did not enter into any foreign currency forward contracts in ~~2007.~~

~~The following table provides information about the Company’s debt instruments as of December 31, 2007 that are sensitive to changes in interest rates.~~

2009.

We have cash flow and earnings exposure due to market interest rate changes for our floating debt obligations. We manage the exposure to financial market risk by performing ongoing evaluations of our debt portfolios and restructuring our financial instruments accordingly to provide the optimum interest structure. At our current level of indebtedness, a half percentage point change in interest rates would affect our interest payments by approximately $0.5 million annually.

11.3 Market Risks Relating to Copper

Copper is the principal raw material we use, accounting for approximately 70% of the cost of sales in ~~2007.~~2009. We purchase copper at prices based on the average prevailing international spot market prices on the London Metal Exchange (the ~~‘‘LME’’~~“LME”) for copper for the one month prior to purchase. The price of copper is influenced heavily by global supply and demand as well as speculative trading. As with other costs of production, changes in the price of copper may affect our cost of sales. Whether this has a material impact on our operating margins and financial results depends primarily on our ability to adjust ~~charges~~our selling prices to our

customers, such that increases and decreases in the price of copper are fully reflected in those ~~charges.~~selling prices. The purchase price of our products is based in part on the cost of copper used to manufacture those products. In addition, in the ordinary course of business we maintain inventories of raw materials and finished ~~pro ducts~~products reasonably necessary for the conduct of our business. These inventories typically reflect the cost of copper prevailing in the market at the time we purchase. Most of our sales of manufactured products reflect copper prices prevailing at the time the products are ordered. A long-term decrease in the price of copper would require the Company to revalue the value of its inventory at periodic intervals to the then net realizable value, which could be below cost. Copper prices have been subject to considerable volatility and it is not always possible to manage our copper purchases and inventory so as to neutralize the impact of copper price volatility. Accordingly, significant volatility in copper prices could have an adverse effect on our operations. No assurance can be given that such volatility will not recur.

In an effort to mitigate the market risks associated with volatility in copper pricing, from time to time the Company enters into copper forward pricing contracts in order to minimize fluctuations of its cost of copper. These instruments permit the Company to hedge its cost of copper for periods from 10 months to 12 months. These forward contracts were entered into with the purpose of securing the source of the copper. The Company did not enter into forwarding contracts with any copper suppliers in 2009.

11.4 Fair Value of Designated Market-Sensitive Derivative Contracts

The company does not record unrealized gains and losses on the designated cash flow hedge instruments in Other Comprehensive Income (loss), rather the income or loss flows thru statement of operations. Moreover, since the company did not transact any hedge instrument in 2009, hence the issue does not exist.

Item 12: Description of Securities Other Than Equity Securities

(Not applicable)

~~(Not applicable)~~

Part II

Item 13: Defaults, Dividend Arrearages and Delinquencies
~~(Not applicable)~~

The Company has experienced no material default in the payment of principal, interest, a sinking or purchase fund installment, or any other material default not cured within 30 days relating to the Company’s or any of its consolidated subsidiaries’ indebtedness.

Item 14: Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders and Use of Proceeds

~~(Not~~

(Not applicable)

Item 15: Controls and Procedures

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

~~In 2004, we retained an internationally recognized consulting firm to act as forensic accounting advisers, to review~~

An evaluation was carried out under the supervision and ~~evaluate~~with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures ~~and to assist the Company~~ in establishing satisfactory disclosure controls and procedures. The consulting firm concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not satisfactory in a number of respects to ensure that material information relating to us was made known to them or to senior management by others within our Company. In particular, as of the end of 2006, the following material weaknesses were identified:


	•	~~Lack of satisfactory policies and procedures governing the Company’s and its subsidiaries’ accounting policies, internal control and code of conduct;~~


	•	~~Lack of an adequate internal audit function;~~


	•	~~Need for improvement in monthly financial statement close process for the Company and its subsidiaries to allow timely financial reporting;~~


	•	~~Need for greater U.S. GAAP and tax expertise to identify potential accounting and taxation issues that have a material impact on the Company; and~~


	•	~~Lack of credit control policies at various subsidiaries.~~

The Company engaged a consultant to advise and assist on establishing an internal audit department and to assist in establishing and maintaining satisfactory disclosure controls and procedures. The Company has not completed this process. As of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report, the Company’s management,accordance with the ~~participation~~provisions of ~~its Chief Executive Officer (the ‘‘CEO’’) and its interim Chief Financial Officer (the ‘‘CFO’’), conducted an evaluation pursuant to~~ Rule 13a-15 promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as ~~amended (the ‘‘Exchange Act’’), of~~amended. Based upon that evaluation, the ~~effectiveness of~~CEO and the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures. Due to the continued existence of certain material weaknesses identified above, under applicable regulatory guidance, managementCFO concluded that ~~the Company’s~~our disclosure controls and procedures ~~as of D ecember 31, 2007~~ were ~~required to be classified as ineffective. The Company is focused on improving its disclosure controls and procedures and is confident that these material weaknesses will no longer exist~~ineffective as of December 31, ~~2008 as long as the Company’s personnel properly implement and adhere to all remediation plans adopted by the Company.~~

We note that there are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any system of disclosure controls and procedures, including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of the disclosure controls and procedures. Accordingly, even effective disclosure controls and procedures can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving their control objectives.

2009.

Internal ~~Controls over~~Control Over Financial Reporting
The Company is committed to improving the efficacy and reliability of its system of internal controls. We are developing new procedures to enhance internal controls over financial reporting, and we are establishing an internal audit department at the Company headquarters which would establish

the rules for internal control procedures and would supervise operating and financial audits. Other measures taken include engaging external consultants to advise on risk control and internal audit functions and to assist in achieving compliance with applicable regulatory requirements, sending staff for training on U.S. GAAP accounting, employing more staff progressively to strengthen the accounting, finance and internal audit departments, implementing credit control policies at certain subsidiaries, and commencing the process of documenting policies and procedures governing the Company’s accounting policies, internal control and code of conduct.

The Company’s management, including our CEO and CFO, is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. ~~Our management, including our CEO and CFO, does~~We do not expect that our internal ~~controls~~control will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, a control may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or ~~proced ures~~procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

The Company’s management, including its CEO and CFO, has assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, ~~2007~~2009 (the ~~‘‘Assessment Date’’~~“Assessment Date”). In making its assessment, management used the criteria set forth in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations ~~(‘‘COSO’’~~(“COSO”) of the Treadway ~~Commission in Internal Control – Integrated Framework.~~Commission. These criteria include the control environment, risk assessment, control activities, information and communication and monitoring of each of the above criteria.

~~The~~ Based on this assessment, the Company’s management, ~~has identified four~~including its CEO and CFO, concluded that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was ineffective as of the Assessment Date.

Based on the Company’s evaluation under the COSO framework, management concluded that a material ~~weaknesses~~weakness, existed in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of the Assessment Date.

In making its assessment, ~~date. As~~management identified a ~~result,~~material weakness in the ~~Company’s management,~~financial statement closing process which resulted in audit adjustments at year end. Deficiencies were noted in our controls over non-routine aspects of our financial statement closing process, including ~~its CEO~~the accounting for foreign currency transactions and ~~CFO, has concluded that, as~~translation whereby foreign currency translation amounts were improperly recorded in other comprehensive income instead of the ~~Assessment Date,~~statement of operations, the calculation and recording of individual income tax liability, allowance for deferred tax assets, fixed asset residual value, and recurring consolidation entries. These deficiencies were attributable to our decentralized reporting structure, our complex consolidation process and inadequate reviews over account balances at the reporting date. In making our assessment, we evaluated that the aggregate effect of these deficiencies represents a material weakness.

We will continue to train our financial accounting reporting staff with respect to the appropriate considerations and review procedures relating to judgmental and non-recurring transactions and balances, and the CFO, who was newly appointed since October 2009, will perform a thorough review of critical estimates and account balances at each reporting date.

Management is committed to remediate this material weakness as timely as possible and has subsequently implemented the following additional control procedures during the first half of 2010:

	•		Trained all levels of finance and accounting staff, both at the subsidiary level and at headquarters level, on US GAAP and recent accounting and reporting developments.

	•		Accounting entries at each subsidiary must be reviewed by their supervisor or finance manager, then signed off by the respective CFO (or, in the absence of CFOs, the finance manager takes charge).

	•		Regular monthly finance meetings are conducted to discuss problems and verify account balances.

	•		Development of a more standardized group reporting package.

We will continue to monitor and to test our internal controls to insure this material weakness has been remediated.

This annual report does not include an attestation report of our registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Our management’s report was not subject to attestation by our registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit us to provide only management’s report in ~~accordance with the provisions of applicable regulatory guidance, the Company’s~~this annual report.

Changes in internal control over financial reporting

Except as indicated in management’s report on internal control over financial reporting, ~~must be classified as ineffective.~~

Management has identified, and the CEO and CFO have reported to the Board of Directors, the Audit Committee and the Company’s independent auditors, the following material weaknesses as of the Assessment Date,there were no other changes in ~~accordance with the provisions of applicable regulatory guidance, with respect to the Company’s internal control over financial reporting:~~


	•	The Company lacks a written policy addressing the review and identification, and does not conduct regular review, of slow-moving and/or obsolete inventory and the making of a corresponding provision on a timely basis at certain subsidiaries.


	•	The Company lacks a written policy addressing the review and identification, and does not conduct regular review, of aged receivables and/or doubtful debts and the making of a corresponding provision on a timely basis at a significant subsidiary.


	•	The Company has insufficient data integrity, access control and segregation of duties controls among personnel with regard to spreadsheets that host financial data at both the corporate and subsidiary levels.


	•	~~The Company has insufficient access control and segregation of duties controls among personnel with regard to application systems that host financial data at both the corporate and subsidiary levels.~~

Management also identified, and the CEO and the CFO have reported to the Audit Committee on May 29, 2008 and the independent auditors, certain significant deficiencies in our internal controls over financial reporting as of the Assessment Date.

The Company has formed a project team, led by the Internal Audit Manager, to implement remediation plans for the aforementioned material weaknesses, commencing in the first half of 2008. Remediation plans adopted by the Company to address the aforementioned material weaknesses were as follows:


	•	Establish formal written policies and procedures for stock provision in order to identify slow-moving or obsolete inventory on a regular basis. The policies and procedures have been approved by management and communicated to all relevant personnel. Any stock provision must be reviewed and properly authorized and recorded on a timely basis.


	•	Establish formal written policies and procedures for receivables provision in order to identify aged receivables or doubtful debts on a regular basis, and to provide a consistent approach to determining when the posting of a reserve or a write-down is necessary or appropriate. The policies and procedures have been approved by management and communicated to all relevant personnel. Any receivables provision must be reviewed and properly authorized and recorded on a timely basis.


	•	~~Implement passwords and define who should have access rights to update the financial spreadsheets.~~


	•	~~Remove unnecessary access from the application systems in order to match the access rights as defined by business processes owners.~~

The aforementioned remediation plans and results to date were presented to the Audit Committee and Board of Directors on June 13, 2008. Management, including the CEO and CFO, believe the remedial course of action can address satisfactorily the material weaknesses and are confident that these material weaknesses will no longer exist as of December 31, 2008 as long as the Company’s personnel properly implement and adhere to the remediation plans adopted by the Company.

The certifications provided as part of this Annual Report by our CEO and CFO are subject to and qualified by the disclosures and discussion in this Annual Report on the current ineffectiveness of disclosure controls and procedures and internal controls over financial reporting. See Section 3.3.6: ‘‘Disclosure Controls and Procedures and Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting Classified as Ineffective.’’

~~This Annual Report does not contain an audit or attestation report of the Company’s registered public accounting firm regarding~~ our internal control over financial reporting ~~due~~that occurred during our last fiscal year that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to ~~the application of a transition period during which the SEC permits us to provide only management’s report on~~materially affect, our internal ~~controls in this Annual Report.~~

control over financial reporting

Item 16A. Audit Committee Financial Expert

~~For certain times prior to January 1, 2007 and until September 28, 2007, the Company did not have an audit committee.~~

As the Common Shares are traded on the OTC BB, the Company is not required to have an audit committee that meets the requirements of, nor is it required to have an audit committee financial expert as contemplated by, Regulation 10A-3 under the Exchange Act. During those periods of time when the Company did not have any independent directors, our full Board of Directors fulfilled the functions of an audit committee pursuant to Section 3(a)(58)(B) of the Exchange Act. On September 28, 2007, our Board appointed Mr. Anson Chan and Dr. Yichin Lee as independent directors to fill the two casual vacancies on the Board, and to constitute the members of the Audit Committee, with Mr. Chan serving as the Audit Committee’s chairman. ~~The Audit Committee was responsible for coordinating the preparation of this Annual Report.~~

On April 26, 2005, the Company adopted an Audit Committee Charter, which sets forth the powers and responsibilities of the Audit Committee of the Company. A copy of the Charter is on file with the SEC.

Item 16B. Code of Ethics

On April 26, 2005, the Company adopted a code of ethics applicable to its Chief Executive Officer and senior financial officers. A copy of the Company’s code of ethics for senior executives is on file with the SEC.

Item 16C. Principal Accountant Fees and Services

Audit Fees

The aggregate fees billed for fiscal years ~~2007~~2009 and ~~2006~~2008 for professional services rendered by the principal accountant for the audit of the Company’s annual financial statements or services normally provided by the accountant in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements totaled ~~$0.6~~$0.8 million and ~~$0.6~~$0.5 million, respectively.

Audit-Related Fees

~~There~~

No fees were ~~no fees~~billed for fiscal year ~~2007~~2009 or ~~2006~~2008 for assurance and audit-related services by the principal accountant ~~that are not~~other than as included in the ~~figure~~figures provided in the preceding paragraph.

Tax Fees

The aggregate fees billed for fiscal ~~year 2007~~years 2009 and ~~2006~~2008 for professional services rendered by the principal accountant for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning ~~total~~totaled approximately ~~$8,000~~$19,000 and ~~$6,000,~~$94,000, respectively. ~~These fees were for services including tax planning, compliance and general advice.~~

All Other Fees

There were no other fees billed for fiscal year ~~2007~~2009 or ~~2006~~2008 for products and services provided by the principal accountant, other than those services described in the preceding paragraphs of this Item ~~16C, rendered by the principal accountant.~~

16C.

Audit Committee Approval

The engagement of the accountant to render audit, oraudit-related and non-audit services is entered into pursuant to pre-approval policies and procedures established in the Charter of the Audit Committee of the Company. ~~All~~Each of the services described in this Item 16C were approved by the Audit Committee holding office at the time of the engagement, which was the full Board of Directors. The services described in this Item 16C were approved also by the current Audit Committee after its appointment by the Board on September 28, 2007.

Committee.

Item 16D. Exemptions from the Listing Standards for the Audit Committees

The Company isdoes not have a class of securities listed ~~issuer.~~

on a national securities exchange or with a national securities association.

Item 16E. Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers

During ~~2007,~~2009, there were no purchases of equity securities made by or on behalf of the ~~issuer~~Company or any ~~‘‘affiliated purchaser’’~~“affiliated purchaser” for the purposes of this ~~Item.~~

Item 16E.

Item 16F. Change in Registrant’s Certifying Accountant

The Company’s independent accountant for fiscal years 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008, Mazars (“Mazars”) resigned and did not stand for re-election by shareholders after the completion of the 2008 audit. None of Mazars’ reports on the financial statements of the Company contained an adverse opinion or a disclaimer of opinion, or was qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope, or accounting principles. The decision to change accountants was put forth and approved by the Audit Committee.

During the 2008 and 2009 fiscal years, there were no disagreements with Mazars on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements, if not resolved to the satisfaction of Mazars, would have caused it to make reference to the subject matter of the disagreements in connection with its report.

During the 2008 and 2009 fiscal years, no reportable events occurred in the course of the performance by Mazars of audit services for the Company.

At the annual general meeting of the shareholders held on September 29, 2009, the Company’s shareholders authorized the engagement of Ernst & Young (“EY”) as the Company’s principal independent accountant to audit the Company’s financial statements for fiscal year 2009.

Item 16G. Corporate Governance

The Common Shares currently are not listed on a national securities exchange.

Part III

Item 17: Financial Statements

The Company has elected to provide the financial statements and related information specified in Item 18 in lieu of Item 17.

Item 18: Financial Statements

See ~~page F-1.~~

pages F-1 — F-49.

Item 19: Exhibits

19.1
~~19.1~~			Index to Audited Financial Statements

			~~Report~~Reports of independent ~~auditors~~registered accounting firms

			Consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, ~~2006~~2008 and ~~2007~~2009

			Consolidated statements of ~~income~~operations for the years ended December 31, ~~2005, 2006~~2007, 2008 and ~~2007~~2009

			Consolidated statements of shareholders’ equity for the years ended December 31, ~~2005, 2006~~2007, 2008 and ~~2007~~2009

			Consolidated statements of cash flows for the years ended December 31, ~~2005, 2006~~2007, 2008 and ~~2007~~2009

			Notes to consolidated financial statements

19.2			Index to Exhibits


1.1		Memorandum of Association of Asia Pacific Wire & Cable Corporation Limited (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.1 of the Company’s annual report on Form 20-F filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 21, 2001).


1.2		Second Amended and Restated Bye-Laws of Asia Pacific Wire & Cable Corporation Limited (incorporated by reference to Exhibit ~~1.2~~3.2 of the Company’s Amendment No. 4 to Form F-1 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 18, 2009).

2.1		Amended and Restated Shareholders’ Agreement dated March 27, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.4 of the Company’s Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Form F-1 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 2, 2009).

4.1		Composite Services Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form ~~20-F~~F-1 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November ~~9, 2007)~~13, 1996).


~~3.1~~	~~Shareholders’ Agreement dated June 28, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Company’s Form 20-F filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 9, 2007).~~


~~4.1~~	~~Composite Services Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Company’s Form 20-F filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 21, 2001).~~


4.2		Indemnification Agreement dated November 6, 1996 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company’s Form F-1 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 13, 1996).


4.3		Agreement for the Sale and Purchase of (i) Shares in Crown Century Holdings Limited and (ii) Shareholder’s Loan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 5.1 of the Company’s annual report on Form 20-F filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 1, 2002).


4.4	Settlement Agreement between Set Top International Inc. (Party A) and Pacific Electric Wire and Cable Co., Ltd. and Asia Pacific Wire and Cable Corporation Ltd. (Party B) (Translation) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 of the Company’s Form 20-F filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 7, 2004).


~~4.5~~	Settlement Agreement between Asia Pacific Wire & Cable Corporation, Ltd. and Sino-JP Fund Co., Ltd. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 of the Company’s annual report on Form 20-F filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 9, 2007).


~~4.6~~ 4.5	~~Termination Agreement between Pacific Electric Wire & Cable Co., Ltd. and Chiao Tung Bank~~	Summaries of Joint Venture Agreements (incorporated by reference to Exhibit ~~4.6~~10.7 of the Company’s Amendment No. 1 to Form F-1 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 26, 2008).

8		List of significant subsidiaries (see Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements).

11		Code of Ethics (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 11 of the Company’s annual report on Form 20-F filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 9, 2007).


8	~~List of significant subsidiaries (see Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements).~~


11	~~Code of Ethics (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 11 of the Company’s Form 20-F filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 9, 2007).~~


12.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer of the Company, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.


12.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer of the Company, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.


13.1		Certification by Chief Executive Officer of periodic financial report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as mandated by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.


13.2		Certification by Chief Financial Officer of periodic financial report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as mandated by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.


15(a)		Audit Committee Charter (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 15(a) of the Company’s annual report on Form 20-F filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 9, 2007).

16(f)		Letter provided by Mazars LLP in Response to Item 16F(a).

SIGNATURE

~~SIGNATURE~~

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 20-F and has duly caused this Annual Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Audited Financial Statements

Asia Pacific Wire & Cable Corporation Limited

As of December 31, ~~2006~~2008 and ~~2007~~

2009

Years ended December 31, ~~2005, 2006~~2007, 2008 and ~~2007~~2009

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

CONTENTS


	Page
Report of independent registered public accounting ~~firm~~firms		F-2

Consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, ~~2006~~2008 and ~~2007~~2009		~~F-3~~	F-4

Consolidated statements of operations for the years ended December 31, ~~2005, 2006~~2007, 2008 and ~~2007~~2009		~~F-5~~	F-6

Consolidated statements of shareholders’ equity for the years ended December 31, ~~2005, 2006~~2007, 2008 and ~~2007~~2009		~~F-6~~	F-7

Consolidated statements of cash flows for the years ended December 31, ~~2005, 2006~~2007, 2008 and ~~2007~~2009		~~F-7~~	F-8

Notes to consolidated financial statements		~~F-8~~	F-9

F-1

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Asia Pacific Wire & Cable Corporation Limited:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Asia Pacific Wire & Cable Corporation Limited and subsidiaries (the ~~‘‘Company’’~~“Company” or “APWC”) as of December 31, ~~2006 and 2007,~~2009, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for ~~each of~~ the ~~three years in the period ended December 31, 2007.~~year then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our ~~audits.~~audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an audit of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Asia Pacific Wire & Cable Corporation Limited and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2009, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

Ernst & Young
Hong Kong SAR

May 14, 2010

F-2

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Asia Pacific Wire & Cable Corporation Limited and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2008, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2008. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by ~~m anagement,~~management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Asia Pacific Wire & Cable Corporation Limited and subsidiaries as of December 31, ~~2006 and 2007,~~2008, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the ~~three~~two years in the period ended December 31, ~~2007,~~2008, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

~~Mazars Moores Rowland LLP~~
~~Certified Public Accountants~~

Mazars LLP
Certified Public Accountants
(On January 3, 2009, Mazars
Moores Rowland LLP changed
its name to Mazars LLP.)

Singapore

June 29, 2009

~~Singapore~~
~~June 12, 2008~~F-3

ASIA PACIFIC WIRE & CABLE CORPORATION LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
~~(In thousands of US Dollars, except share data)~~


	December 31,								As of December 31
(In thousands of US Dollars, except share data)									2008			2009
ASSETS
	2006				2007
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents		$	24,664			$	29,127		$	37,510		$	41,534
Unrestricted short-term bank deposits (note 5)			2,003				1,861			7,756			—
Restricted short-term bank deposits (note 5)			13,587				18,714			15,033			13,145
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $9,290 and $11,485 at December 31, 2006 and 2007, respectively (note 11)			120,422				145,902
Amounts due from related parties (note 17)			8,534				8,638
Inventories, net of allowance for inventories of $3,806 and $2,836 at December 31, 2006 and 2007, respectively (note 11)
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $9,644 and $8,694 at December 31, 2008 and 2009, respectively (note 9)										95,901			101,849
Amounts due from related parties (note 15)										6,922			5,664
Inventories, net of allowance for inventories of $26,715 and $3,995 at December 31, 2008 and 2009, respectively (note 9)
Distributed products			3,390				3,897			8,227			5,295
Finished products			45,624				47,350			24,060			31,949
Products in process			22,576				26,702			14,563			17,318
Raw materials and supplies			37,423				27,482			25,712			14,485
			109,013				105,431
Investments (note 7)			232				2,555
Deferred tax assets (note 12)			490				2,481
										72,562			69,047

Available-for-sale investments (note 6)										68			106
Deferred tax assets (note 10)										3,064			2,595
Prepaid expenses			10,612				5,601			4,942			3,928
Other current assets			1,995				2,262			2,515			1,180

Total current assets			291,552				322,572			246,273			239,048


Property, plant and equipment:
Land			4,514				6,230			4,381			5,470
Land use rights			1,710				1,827			3,778			2,936
Buildings			40,332				45,374			42,406			45,130
Machinery and equipment			98,325				116,278			103,266			108,711
Motor vehicles			3,150				3,657			3,303			3,724
Office equipment			8,953				10,537			10,060			10,280
Assets held for development			7,109				6,824

										167,194			176,251
			164,093				190,727
Accumulated depreciation and amortization			(106,749	)			(133,209	)		(118,568	)		(132,611	)
			57,344				57,518
Other assets:
Long term investments (note 7)			533				650
Investment in equity investees (note 21)			4,238				4,246
Goodwill (note 6)			8,801				8,801
										48,626			43,640


Available-for-sale investments (note 6)										544			580
Investment in equity investees (note 18)										4,103			3,263
Goodwill										8,801			8,801
Other assets			58				297			269			107
Deferred tax assets (note 12)			2,039				2,032
Deferred tax assets (note 10)										1,182			613

										14,899			13,364

			15,669				16,026
Total assets		$	364,565			$	396,116		$	309,798		$	296,052

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-4

ASIA PACIFIC WIRE & CABLE CORPORATION LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
~~(In thousands of US Dollars, except share data)~~


	December 31,								December 31,
(In thousands of US Dollars, except share data)									2008			2009
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
	2006				2007
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Bank loans and overdrafts (note 8)		$	95,986			$	102,174
Bank loans and overdrafts (note 7)									$	57,962		$	37,185
Accounts payable			31,114				32,325			46,367			33,706
Accrued expenses			7,522				7,896			4,550			9,244
Amounts due to related parties (note 17)			33,306				31,801
Short-term loans from related parties (note 17)			2,632				1,972
Income tax liabilities (note 12)			8,308				8,782
Current portion of long-term debt (note 9)			1,577		—
Deferred tax liabilities (note 12)			516				561
Amounts due to related parties (note 15)										25,811			17,487
Short-term loans from the immediate holding(note 15)										1,732			1,732
Income tax liabilities (note 10)										5,710			7,059
Deferred tax liabilities (note 10)										65			—
Other current liabilities			2,507				4,652			3,648			5,496


Total current liabilities			183,468				190,163			145,845			111,909

Other liabilities			387				578			464			546
Deferred tax liabilities (note 12)			728				698
Deferred tax liabilities (note 10)										782			1,005


Total liabilities			184,583				191,439			147,091			113,460
Minority interest			61,217				67,894
Commitments and contingencies (notes 14 and 16)
Shareholders’ equity (note 10):


Commitments and contingencies (notes 12 and 14)

APWC shareholders’ equity (note 8):
Common stock, $0.01 par value:
Authorized shares – 20,000,000 shares Issued and outstanding shares – 13,830,769 in 2006 and 2007			138				138
Authorized shares of 50,000,000 shares was effective on December 31, 2008 and 2009
Issued and outstanding shares – 13,830,769 shares										138			138
Additional paid-in capital			111,541				111,541			111,541			111,541
Retained earnings			26,524				29,468			15,819			25,908
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (note 13)			(19,438	)			(4,364	)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (note 11)										(13,369	)		(10,195	)


Total APWC shareholders’ equity										114,129			127,392


Non-controlling interests										48,578			55,200


Total shareholders’ equity			118,765				136,783			162,707			182,592


Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity		$	364,565			$	396,116		$	309,798		$	296,052

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-5

ASIA PACIFIC WIRE & CABLE CORPORATION LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
~~(In thousands of US Dollars, except share data)~~


													Year ended December 31,
(In thousands of US Dollars, except share data)													2007			2008			2009
Net sales
Manufactured products (sales to related parties amounted to $9,110 in 2007, $5,855 in 2008 and $4,144 in 2009 (note 15))													$	494,805		$	447,848		$	300,121
Distributed products														10,783			32,415			28,102
Sales, delivery and installation of wires and cables														5,253			20,535			34,008

														510,841			500,798			362,231
Costs of sales (purchases from related parties amounted to $69,240 in 2007, $57,401 in 2008 and $59,785 in 2009)
Manufactured products														(450,134	)		(410,581	)		(280,085	)
Distributed products														(10,703	)		(30,831	)		(26,585	)
Sales, delivery and installation of wires and cables														(5,600	)		(21,491	)		(33,119	)
Recovery (allowance) for inventory reserve														1,272			(25,145	)		23,949

	Year ended December 31,													(465,165	)		(488,048	)		(315,840	)
	2005				2006				2007
Net sales
Manufactured products		$	301,516			$	439,280			$	494,805
Distributed products			20,055				12,416				10,783
Sales, delivery and installation of wires and cables			15,691				16,421				5,253
Gross profit														45,676			12,750			46,391
			337,262				468,117				510,841
Costs of sales (purchases from related parties amounted to $55,619 in 2005, $75,338 in 2006 and $69,240 in 2007)
Manufactured products			(264,823	)			(380,792	)			(450,134	)
Distributed products			(19,421	)			(11,309	)			(10,703	)
Sales, delivery and installation of wires and cables			(16,066	)			(16,705	)			(5,600	)
(Allowance) recovery for inventory reserve			(346	)			(2,017	)			1,272
Selling, general and administrative expenses														(26,156	)		(29,032	)		(28,715	)
Recovery (allowance) for doubtful accounts														(3,295	)		(12	)		860
Impairment of long-lived assets														—			—			(77	)
			(300,656	)			(410,823	)			(465,165	)
Gross profit			36,606				57,294				45,676
Selling, general and administrative expenses			(25,536	)			(26,195	)			(26,156	)
Allowance for doubtful accounts			(1,017	)			(1,221	)			(3,295	)
Impairment of long-lived assets			—				(196	)			—
Income from operations			10,053				29,682				16,225
Exchange (loss) gain			(3,137	)			5,464				864

Income (loss) from operations														16,225			(16,294	)		18,459

Exchange gain (loss), net														864			(1,712	)		528
Interest income			680				705				1,517			1,517			990			458
Interest expense			(3,427	)			(5,886	)			(7,580	)		(7,580	)		(5,769	)		(2,597	)
Share of net gain of equity investees			170				73				124
Share of net (loss) gain of equity investees														124			(142	)		(40	)
Impairment of investments			(3,223	)			(86	)			(95	)		(95	)		—			—
(Loss) gain on sale of investments			(259	)			(729	)			35
Gain on liquidation of subsidiary			—				1,801				—
Other income			829				1,536				2,070
Income before income taxes and minority interests			1,686				32,560				13,160
Income taxes (note 12)			(3,860	)			(10,257	)			(6,298	)
Minority interests			(2,783	)			(9,330	)			(2,029	)
Net (loss) income		$	(4,957	)		$	12,973			$	4,833
Basic and diluted (loss) income per share		$	(0.36	)		$	0.94			$	0.35
Gain on sale of investments														35			—			—
Gain on liquidation of subsidiaries														—			—			568
Other income, net														2,070			2,859			2,196


Income (loss) before income taxes														13,160			(20,068	)		19,572

Income taxes (note 10)														(6,298	)		(2,132	)		(5,344	)


Net income (loss)														6,862			(22,200	)		14,228

Less: Net (loss) income attributable to non-controlling interests														(2,029	)		8,551			(4,139	)


Net income (loss) attributable to APWC													$	4,833		$	(13,649	)	$	10,089


Basic and diluted income (loss) per share													$	0.35		$	(0.99	)	$	0.73


Basic and diluted weighted average common shares outstanding			13,830,769				13,830,769				13,830,769			13,830,769			13,830,769			13,830,769

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-6

Common
stock Additional
paid-in
capital Retained
earnings Accumulated
other
comprehensive
income (loss) Total
Balance at January 1, 2005 $ 138 $ 111,541 $ 18,508 $ (23,041 ) $ 107,146
Net loss for 2005 — — (4,957 ) — (4,957 )
Currency translation adjustment — — — (4,062 ) (4,062 )
Unrealized loss on available-for-sale securities – net of income tax of $286 — — — (505 ) (505 )
Comprehensive loss (9,524 )
Balance at December 31, 2005 138 111,541 13,551 (27,608 ) 97,622
Net income for 2006 — — 12,973 — 12,973
Currency translation adjustment — — — 9,822 9,822
Less: reclassification adjustment for realized translation gain for liquidation of subsidiary included in net income, net of income tax of $556 — — — (1,245 ) (1,245 )
Gain realized on sale of available-for-sale securities – net of income tax of $258 — — — (343 ) (343 )
Unrealized loss on available-for-sales securities – net of income tax of $92 — — — (64 ) (64 )
Comprehensive income 21,143
Balance at December 31, 2006 138 111,541 26,524 (19,438 ) 118,765
Net income for 2007 — — 4,833 — 4,833
Currency translation adjustment — — — 15,179 15,179
Pension benefits recognized under SFAS 158 (note 18) — — — (71 ) (71 )
Adoption of FIN 48 effective January 1, 2007 (note 12) — — (1,889 ) — (1,889 )
Gain realized on sale of available-for-sale securities – net of income tax of $6 — — — (28 ) (28 )
Unrealized loss on available-for-sale securities – net of income tax of $6 — — — (6 ) (6 )
Comprehensive income 18,018
Balance at December 31, 2007 $ 138 $ 111,541 $ 29,468 $ (4,364 ) $ 136,783


								Accumulated
								other
	Common		Additional		Retained			comprehensive
(In thousands of US Dollars, except share data)	Stock		paid-in capital		earnings			income (loss)			Total
Balance at January 1, 2007	$	138	$	111,541	$	26,524		$	(19,438	)	$	118,765
Comprehensive income
Net income		–		–		4,833			—			4,833
Other comprehensive income, net of tax
Currency translation adjustment		–		–		–			15,179			15,179
Pension liability adjustments (note 16)		–		–		–			(71	)		(71	)
Gain realized on sale of available-for sale securities net of income tax of $6		–		–		–			(28	)		(28	)
Unrealized loss on available-for-sale securities – net of income tax of $6		–		–		–			(6	)		(6	)

Other comprehensive income, net of tax									15,074

Comprehensive income												19,907

Adoption of FASB Interpretation No. 48 effective as of January 1, 2007 (codified within ASC 740, “Income Taxes”) (note 10)		–		–		(1,889	)		–			(1,889	)



Balance at December 31, 2007		138		111,541		29,468			(4,364	)		136,783
Comprehensive loss
Net loss		–		–		(13,649	)		—			(13,649	)
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax
Currency translation adjustment		–		–		–			(8,994	)		(8,994	)
Pension liability adjustments (note 16)		–		–		–			7			7
Unrealized loss on sale of available- for-sale securities – net of income tax of $27		–		–		–			(18	)		(18	)

Other comprehensive loss, net of tax									(9,005	)

Comprehensive loss												(22,654	)


Balance at December 31, 2008		138		111,541		15,819			(13,369	)		114,129
Comprehensive income
Net income		–		–		10,089			—			10,089
Other comprehensive income, net of tax
Currency translation adjustment		–		–		–			3,177			3,177
Pension liability adjustments (note 16)		–		–		–			(4	)		(4	)
Unrealized loss on sale of available-for- sale securities – net of income tax of $-18		–		–		–			1			1

Other comprehensive loss, net of tax									3,174

Comprehensive income												13,263


Balance at December 31, 2009	$	138	$	111,541	$	25,908		$	(10,195	)	$	127,392

Asia Pacific Wire & Cable Corporation Limited ~~(‘‘APWC’’~~(“APWC” or the ~~‘‘Company’’~~“Company”), which is a subsidiary of Pacific Electric Wire & Cable Co., Ltd. ~~(‘‘PEWC’’~~(“PEWC”), a Taiwanese company, was incorporated as an exempted company in Bermuda on September 19, 1996 under the Companies Act 1981 of Bermuda (as amended) for the purpose of acting as a holding company. The Company is principally engaged in owning operating companies engaged in the power cable, telecommunication cable, enameled wire and electronic cable industry.

The Company’s operating subsidiaries (the ~~‘‘Operating Subsidiaries’’~~“Operating Subsidiaries”) are engaged in the manufacturing and distribution of telecommunications, power cable and enameled wire products in Singapore, Thailand, Australia, the People’s Republic of China ~~(‘‘PRC’’~~(“PRC”) and other markets in the Asia Pacific region. Major customers of the Operating Subsidiaries include government organizations, electric contracting firms, electrical dealers, and wire and cable factories.

~~Background on the Pledge Agreement to Swiss Re~~

~~As previously disclosed~~ The Company’s operating subsidiaries engage also in the ~~Company’s 2006 Financial Statements, PEWC~~distribution of certain wire and ~~Swiss Re entered into an Amended and Restated Letter of Credit and Reimbursement Agreement (the ‘‘LC Agreement’’), pursuant to which Swiss Re issued a letter of credit to satisfy~~cable products manufactured by PEWC. In certain credit and loan obligations of PEWC’s subsidiary, Pacific USA Holdings Corp. (‘‘PUSA’’), to PUSA’s lenders. Under the LC Agreement, Swiss Re issued a Standby Letter of Credit in favor of Standard Chartered Bank, Hong Kong Branch (‘‘Standard’’), in the total amount of $124 million (the ‘‘Letter of Credit’’), conditioned upon the closing of a $120 million transaction between PUSA and Standard. As a condition to obtaining the letter of credit, in February 2002, PUSA, PEWC and Swiss Re finalized a Pledge Agreement (‘‘Pledge Agreement’’), pursuant to which P USA pledged to Swiss Re shares representing approximately 53% of the equity ofmarkets, the Company (the ‘‘Pledged Shares’’), together with certain shares of other related entities. At that time PEWC was the ultimate beneficial owner of approximately 75.4% of the equity interest in the Companyalso provides project engineering services to customers through its ~~subsidiaries, Kinbong Holdings Limited (‘‘Kinbong’’)~~SDI (Supply Distribution and ~~PUSA.~~

~~PUSA Bankruptcy~~

As also previously disclosed in the 2006 financial statements, in December 2002, PUSA filed a voluntary petition for bankruptcy protection under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code. Because of the bankruptcy filing, in December 2002, Swiss Re paid to Standard $90.6 million under the terms of the Letter of Credit as a result of which Swiss Re became entitled, under the terms of the Pledge Agreement, to foreclose on the Pledged Shares of the Company.

~~Litigation~~

Following an internal investigation, it was discovered by the Boards of both PEWC and the Company that an ex-director of PEWC (‘‘ex-director’’), without the authorization of either Board, had separately negotiated a transaction whereby the Pledged Shares of the Company held by PUSA and the shares of the Company held by Kinbong would be transferred to Set Top International Inc. (‘‘Set Top’’), a British Virgins Islands company. The terms of the transaction were initially withheld from and, subsequently, misrepresented to the Boards of PEWC and the Company by the ex-director, together with certain of his associates.

The Boards of both PEWC and the Company concluded that the ex-director had an undisclosed interest in, or control position over, Set Top, and that the terms he agreed to with Set Top were significantly less favorable to the companies than those that would have been available in a bona fide transaction with an unaffiliated party.

Installation) business segment.

~~ASIA PACIFIC WIRE & CABLE CORPORATION LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES~~
~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~
~~(In thousands of US Dollars, except share data)~~


1.	~~ORGANIZATION AND PRINCIPAL ACTIVITIES~~ ~~(continued)~~

On December 4, 2003, PEWC and the Company commenced an action in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (the ‘‘Southern District’’) against the following parties: Set Top, Kinbong, Tom Ching-Yun Tung, Frank Wei-Feng Lin, Tai-Sheng Lien, Fu-Chuan Tsai, Fu-Nu Tsai, Yuan-Chun Hsu, Jack Takacs and Robert Everett Wolin (collectively ‘‘Defendants’’). The Complaint alleged various causes of action, including fraud and conspiracy to commit fraud; violation of section 13(d) of the Securities Exchange Act; RICO violations under 18 USC § 1962; and breach of fiduciary duty.

The Southern District action did not progress to the discovery phase as the parties sought to agree to the terms of a settlement agreement. On July 2, 2004, the Company, PEWC and Set Top entered into a Settlement Agreement (the ‘‘Settlement Agreement’’) pursuant to which PEWC agreed to pay Set Top $25 million (the ‘‘Settlement Amount’’).

Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, the Company, PEWC and Set Top agreed to withdraw all claims in all litigation proceedings against each other, including the actions in New York, Singapore and Bermuda, and Set Top agreed to withdraw all of its claims in the PUSA bankruptcy proceedings. The parties have filed stipulations of discontinuance and/or dismissal for each of those actions.

In order to implement the terms of the Settlement Agreement, PEWC, Set Top and Asset Managers Co., Ltd. (‘‘AMC’’) entered into a Share Purchase Agreement and a related Option Agreement dated September 15, 2004, pursuant to which AMC agreed to pay to Set Top $25 million in exchange for all right, title and interest of Set Top in 10,074,102 shares of APWC. Following the closing of the 2004 Share Purchase Agreement, AMC designated Sino-JP Fund Co., Ltd. (‘‘Sino-JP’’) as an assignee of the Subject Shares and Sino-JP was registered as the record owner of the Subject Shares with the Company’s register.

~~As of December 31, 2004, Sino-JP held 10,074,102 shares, representing approximately 72.84% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock of the Company.~~

On September 14, 2005, PEWC exercised the repurchase option under the Option Agreement and reacquired 7,307,948 shares of the Common Stock, representing 52.84% of the total issued and outstanding Common Stock. As a result of the reacquisition by PEWC of majority control, PEWC indirectly held as of that date 7,664,615 shares of Common Stock, representing 55.4% of the total issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock and Sino-JP now held 2,766,154 shares of the Common Stock, representing 20% of the total issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock (the ‘‘Sino-JP Shares’’).

On June 28, 2007, the Company entered into a comprehensive settlement and release agreement with Sino-JP, which dismissed and released all claims between the parties and which put an end to all related litigation. The 55% majority shareholder of the Company, PEWC, also entered into a settlement and release agreement with Sino-JP that terminated all disputes and litigation between those parties.

On June 28, 2007, SOF ~~Investments,~~Investment, L.P. ~~(‘‘SOF’’~~(“SOF”), a Delaware limited partnership controlled by MSD Capital, L.P. acquired the Sino-JP ~~Shares~~ and entered into a shareholders’ agreement with the Company and PEWC. The shares acquired constituted 20% of the issued and outstanding shares of the Company.

On March 30, 2009, SOF sold 10.2% of the issued and outstanding shares of the Company to PEWC. The sale results in PEWC holding 65.6% of the equity of the Company and SOF holding 9.8%.

Share Capital

On September 8, 2008, the Company’s shareholders approved an increase to the authorized shares capital from 20,000,000 Common Shares, par value $0.01 per share, to 50,000,000 Common Shares, par value $0.01 per share.

The subsidiaries of the Company are set out below:


	Percentage of
	Equity interest
	As of December 31,
Place of incorporation and operations	2008			2009
The British Virgin Islands

Asia Pacific Wire & Cable General Holdings Ltd		100	%		100	%

PRC (APWC) Holding Ltd.		100	%		100	%

Samray Inc.		100	%		100	%

Siam (APWC) Holdings Ltd.		100	%		100	%

Moon View Ltd.		100	%		100	%

Trigent Investment Holdings Limited		100	%		100	%

Crown Century Holdings Ltd.		100	%		100	%

F-9

ASIA PACIFIC WIRE & CABLE CORPORATION LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of USU.S. Dollars, except share data)

1. ORGANIZATION AND PRINCIPAL ACTIVITIES(continued)


	Percentage of
	Equity interest
	As of December 31,
Place of incorporation and operations	2008			2009
Singapore

Sigma Cable Company (Private) Limited (“Sigma Cable”)		98.3	%		98.3	%

Sino-Sin Trading Pte. Ltd. (“Sino-Sin”) **		100	%		0	%

Sigma-Epan International Pte Ltd. (“Sigma-Epan”)		100	%		100	%

Epan Industries Pte Ltd.		100	%		100	%

Epan Data-Comm System Pte Ltd		100	%		100	%

Singvale Pte Ltd (“Singvale”)		100	%		100	%

Malaysia

Elecain Industry Sdn. Bhd.		92.6	%		92.6	%

Sigma-Epan Malaysia Sdn. Bhd.		100	%		100	%

The People’s Republic of China

Ningbo Pacific Cable Co., Ltd. (“Ningbo Pacific”)		94.31	%		94.31	%

Shanghai Yayang Electric Co., Ltd. (“Shanghai Yayang”)		54.41	%		54.41	%

Shandong Pacific Fiber Optics Co.Ltd (“SPFO”)		51	%		51	%

Pacific Electric Wire & Cable (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd (“PEWS”)		100	%		100	%

Hong Kong
			��
Crown Century Holdings Limited (“CCH HK”)		100	%		100	%

Australia

Australia Pacific Electric Cable Pty Limited (“APEC”)		98.53	%		98.53	%

Thailand

Charoong Thai Wire and Cable Public Company Limited (“Charoong Thai”)*		50.93	%		50.93	%

Siam Pacific Electric Wire & Cable Company Limited (“Siam-Pacific”)		50.93	%		50.93	%

Pacific-Thai Electric Wire & Cable Company Limited (“Pacific-Thai”)		50.93	%		50.93	%

Hard Lek Limited (“Hard Lek”)		73.98	%		73.98	%

APWC (Thailand) Co., Ltd		99.48	%		99.48	%

F-10


1.	~~ORGANIZATION AND PRINCIPAL ACTIVITIES~~ ~~(continued)~~


	Percentage of
	Equity interest
	As of December 31,
Place of incorporation and operations	2008			2009
Thailand

PEWC (Thailand) Co., Ltd		99.48	%		99.48	%

CTW Beta Co. Ltd.		50.89	%		50.89	%

Siam Fiber Optics Co. Ltd		30.56	%		30.56	%

Myanmar

Myanmar Sigma Cable Co., Ltd. (Not active)		78.59	%		78.59	%


	Percentage of
	Equity interest
	As of December 31,
Place of incorporation and operations	2008			2009
The People’s Republic of China

Shandong Huayu Pacific Fibre Optics Communications Co., Ltd. (“Shandong Huayu”)		48.73	%		48.73	%

Shandong Pacific Rubber Cable Co., Ltd. (“SPRC”)		25.00	%		25.00	%

Thailand

Siam Pacific Holding Company Limited (“SPHC”)		49.00	%		49.00	%

Loxley Pacific Co., Ltd. (“Lox Pac”)		21.39	%		21.39	%

ASIA PACIFIC WIRE & CABLE CORPORATION LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of ~~Thailand and is engaged in the manufacturing of wire and cable products for the power and telecommunications industries in Thailand.~~

U.S. Dollars, except share data)

1. ORGANIZATION AND PRINCIPAL ACTIVITIES(continued)

Acquisitions accounted for as purchases and disposals undertaken by the Company during the years ended December 31, ~~2005, 2006~~2007, 2008 and ~~2007 include~~2009 included the following:


	~~(a)~~	Disposal in 2005 of 0.4% interest in Charoong Thai, thereby decreasing the Company’s interest in Charoong Thai from 52.83% to 52.43% due to the exercise of warrants. The Company recognized a loss of US$357 on the disposal of these Charoong Thai shares.


	~~(b)~~	Disposal in 2006 of 2.04% interest in Charoong Thai, thereby decreasing the Company’s interest in Charoong Thai from 52.43% to 50.39% due to the exercise of warrants. The Company recognized a loss of $1,955 on the disposal of these Charoong Thai shares.


	~~(c)~~	During 2006, Charoong Thai’s subsidiary, Pacific-Thai contributed additional capital in Shanghai Yayang in the form of a cash injection of $1,000, the excess of its consideration paid over the fair value of the assets acquired resulted in goodwill of $477. The Company’s interest in Charoong Thai decreased from 52.83% to 52.43% and from 52.43% to 50.39% due to the exercise of warrants in 2005 and 2006, respectively, which also resulted in the Company’s interest in Shanghai Yayang decrease by 0.37% to 56.36% and by 2.46% to 53.90% in 2005 and 2006, respectively.


	~~(d)~~	In August 2000, the Board of Directors of Charoong Thai resolved to dissolve CTW (Hong Kong) Limited which was an overseas subsidiary company as CTW (Hong Kong) Limited was inactive. The dissolution was completed on August 16, 2006, and a gain of $1,801 was recognized in the consolidated statement of operations in 2006.

In 2002, three wholly owned subsidiaries of Sigma-Epan were placed into liquidation. In April 2009, the liquidator received the clearance letters from government authorities of Singapore relating to the dissolution of three subsidiaries of Sigma-Epan. On May 22, 2009, Sigma-Epan conducted a final meeting to dissolve the subsidiaries. As at the previous balance sheet date, the Company’s balance sheet includes liabilities of US$568 resulting from these subsidiaries which is recognized as gain on liquidation of subsidiaries in current year profit or loss.

The Company was listed on the New York Stock Exchange in March 1997. On December 24, 2001, the staff of the New York Stock Exchange ~~(‘‘NYSE’’~~(“NYSE”) announced that it had determined that the trading of the common stock of APWC should be suspended prior to December 31, 2001. The decision was reached in view of the fact that the Company had fallen below NYSE’s continued listing standards regarding: average global market capitalization over a consecutive 30 trading-day period of not less than ~~$15;~~$15 million; and average closing price of a security of not less than ~~$0.001~~one (1) dollar over a consecutive 30 trading-day period. Following the delisting of the Company’s

~~ASIA PACIFIC WIRE & CABLE CORPORATION LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES~~
~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~
~~(In thousands of US Dollars, except share data)~~


1.	~~ORGANIZATION AND PRINCIPAL ACTIVITIES~~ ~~(continued)~~

common stock on the NYSE, the Company’s common stock was traded under the ticker AWRCF, on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board ~~(‘‘~~(“OTC ~~BB’’~~BB”), operated by ~~NASD,~~the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. (“NASD”). After the Company failed to timely file its annual report on Form 20-F for the 2004 fiscal year, the Company was delisted from the OTC BB in August 2005 and since that time its shares of common stock have been quoted on the ~~‘‘pink sheets’’~~“pink sheets” market by Pink Sheets LLC, a privately owned company that provides pricing and financial information for over-the-counter securities. On April 9, 2008, the Company ~~has~~ listed and ~~begun~~began trading its common shares on the OTC BB after completing all reporting requirements and filing all outstanding financial reports with the SEC. The Company is subject to the reporting requirements under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Put Right and Option

Under the terms of the Amended Shareholders’ Agreement, SOF has the right and option (but not the obligation) to sell to PEWC upon the occurrence of a Put Event (defined below), and PEWC agreed to purchase from SOF upon the occurrence of a Put Event, all Registrable Securities then owned by SOF (the “ Put Shares “), for an amount equal to the Put Price (defined below) together with interest (calculated on the basis of a 360 day year) on the Put Price, computed (x) from June 28, 2007 through May 31, 2010 at a rate per annum that shall be equal to the Libor Rate plus fifty (50) basis points (compounded annually), and (y) from June 1, 2010 until the Put Closing (defined below) at a rate per annum that shall be equal to the Libor Rate plus one hundred and fifty (150) basis points (compounded annually) (the “ Put Right “). If the Put Event terminates prior to the closing of such Put Right, the exercise of the Put Right is deemed rescinded and the transaction relating to the Put Right is deemed cancelled, but this will not terminate the existence of a future Put Right upon the triggering of a future Put Event.

A “Put Event” means any date (i) after March 11, 2009 whereby an Event has occurred and continues to occur, or (ii) after February 1, 2011 whereby the shares are not listed on a US Securities Market, which means any of the NASDAQ Stock Market, Inc. (Global Market or Global Select Market), the NYSE Alternext U.S. (f/k/a the American Stock Exchange LLC), the New York Stock Exchange LLC or one or more of the principal or secondary exchanges for the public trading of equity securities in any of Hong Kong, Tokyo or Singapore. The “Put Price” means for (i) shares purchased pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, an aggregate amount equal to the product of (a) the number of shares being sold and (b) US$4.35 and (ii) Shares purchased under preemptive right provisions of the Amended Shareholders’ Agreement, and aggregate amount equal to the purchase price thereof.

The Shareholders’ Agreement does not contain any provisions that impose any purchase, reimbursement or financing obligations on the Company in the event that SOF exercises the Put Right. The Put Right is an obligation solely of PEWC and not of the Company. However, for the avoidance of doubt and as a re-affirmation that the financial and other obligation to SOF in the event

F-12


2.	~~BASIS OF PRESENTATION~~

ASIA PACIFIC WIRE & CABLE CORPORATION LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of U.S. Dollars, except share data)

2. ORGANIZATION AND PRINCIPAL ACTIVITIES(continued)

of an exercise of the Put Right rest exclusively with PEWC, the Company has, on March 27, 2009, entered into a Non-Recourse Confirmation Agreement with PEWC whereby PEWC (i) covenants that it has no put right against the Company relating to the Put Shares and that PEWC’s obligations to SOF are without recourse to the Company, (ii) waives any such right should it arise in the future, and (iii) agrees that it shall not cause the Company, directly or indirectly, to incur any costs associated with the exercise of the Put Right.

The Shareholders’ Agreement provides, and the Non-recourse Confirmation Agreement confirms, that the Put Right is solely the obligation of PEWC. The Company has no purchase, reimbursement or financing obligations in the event that SOF exercises the Put Right. As such, the Company has classified the Put Shares as equity in the accompanying financial statements.

2. BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ~~(‘‘~~(“US ~~GAAP’’~~GAAP”). The basis of accounting differs from that used in the statutory financial statements of the Company’s subsidiaries and equity investee companies, which are prepared in accordance with the accounting principles generally accepted in their respective countries of incorporation. In the opinion of management, the consolidated financial statements have reflected all costs incurred by the Company and its subsidiaries in operating the business.

All dollar amounts in the financial statements and in the notes herein are U.S. ~~dollars (‘‘~~Dollars (“US$’’”) unless otherwise designated.


3.	~~CHANGES IN PRESENTATION OF COMPARATIVE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~

~~Certain comparative amounts in prior financial statements have been reclassified to~~

3. CHANGES IN PRESENTATION OF COMPARATIVE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

To conform with the current year’s ~~presentation. Such reclassification~~presentation, the assets held for use of $3,501 previously presented in the 2008 financial statement have been reclassified to the respective property, plant, and equipment asset categories. Also, the land not being used for operation of $540 previously presented in the 2008 financial statements has been reclassified to the land category. The reclassifications had no effect on financial condition, gross profit, income (loss) from operations or net income (loss) ~~income.~~.

F-13


4.	~~SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES~~

ASIA PACIFIC WIRE & CABLE CORPORATION LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of U.S. Dollars, except share data)

4. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries. ~~Significant~~All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated on consolidation. The Company’s investments for which its ownership exceeds 20%, but which are not majority-owned or controlled, are accounted for using the equity method if the Company has the ability to exercise significant influence over the companies’ operating and financial policies. When the Company’s carrying value in an equity method investee company is reduced to zero, no further losses are recorded in the Company’s consolidated financial statements unless the Company guaranteed obligations of the investee company or has committed additional funding. When the Investee company subsequently reports income, the Company will not record its share of such income until it equals the amount of its share of losses not previously recognized.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents.

Inventories

~~ASIA PACIFIC WIRE & CABLE CORPORATION LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES~~
~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~
~~(In thousands of US Dollars, except share data)~~


4.	~~SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES~~ ~~(continued)~~

~~Inventories~~

Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market value. Cost is determined using the first-in, first-out or weighted average method.

Note 9 – Valuation and Qualifying Accounts.

Income Taxes

In 2007, the Company adopted the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation No. 48 (FIN 48), ~~‘‘Accounting~~“Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes-an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109.~~’’ FIN 48 clarifies~~” (codified within FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 740, “Income Taxes”). FASB ASC 740 contains a two-step approach to recognizing and measuring uncertain tax positions. The first step is to evaluate the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements in accordance with SFAS No. 109, ‘‘Accounting for Income Taxes’’ (SFAS 109). FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statements recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return, and provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition. For those benefits to be recognized, a taxfor recognition by determining if the weight of available evidence indicates it is more likely than not that the position ~~must be more-likely-than-not to~~will be sustained ~~upon examination by taxing authorities.~~on audit, including resolution of related appeals or litigation processes, if any. The ~~amount recognized~~second step is ~~measured~~to measure the tax benefit as the largest amount, ~~of benefit that~~which is ~~greater~~more than ~~fifty percent~~50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. ~~Our~~The Company considers many factors when evaluating and estimating its tax positions and tax benefits, which may require periodic adjustments and which may not accurately anticipate actual outcomes. The Company’s policy is to recognize interest expense and penalties related to income tax matters as a component of income tax expense.

Current income tax expense is the amount of income taxes expected to be payable for the current year. ~~A deferred~~Deferred income tax ~~asset or liability is established for~~balances reflect the ~~expected future tax consequences resulting from~~effects of temporary differences inbetween the ~~financial reporting and tax bases~~carrying amounts of assets and liabilities and ~~for the~~their tax basis and are stated at enacted tax rates expected ~~future tax benefit~~ to be ~~derived from tax credit and loss carryforwards. Deferred~~in effect when taxes are actually paid or recovered. FASB ASC 740,requires that deferred tax assets ~~are~~be evaluated for future realization and reduced by a valuation allowance to the extent the Company believes a portion will not be realized. The Company considers many factors when inassessing the ~~opinion~~likelihood of ~~management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all~~future realization of ~~the~~its deferred tax assets, ~~will not be realized.~~including its recent cumulative

F-14

ASIA PACIFIC WIRE & CABLE CORPORATION LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of U.S. Dollars, except share data)

4. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

Income Taxes (cont’d)

earnings experience and expectations of future taxable income by taxing jurisdiction, the carry-forward periods available to the Company for tax reporting purposes, and other relevant factors. Deferred income tax expense (benefit) is the net change during the year in the deferred income tax asset or liability.

Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost less depreciation and any impairment losses. Asset leases qualifying as capital leases are also included in property, plant and equipment. Major renewals and improvements are capitalized and minor replacements, maintenance, and ~~repairs~~repair expenses are charged to current operations as incurred. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets or the respective lease term, whichever is ~~shorter.~~shorter, as follows:


Land		Nil
Land use rights		15 — 50 years
Buildings		5 — 30 years
Machinery and equipment		5 — 10 years
Motor vehicles		3 — 10 years
Office equipment		3 — 10 years

Depreciation for 2007, 2008 and 2009 amounted to $9,079, $7646 and $8,941, respectively. No depreciation expense is charged for construction in progress and machinery and equipment under installation. ~~Depreciation~~

Capitalized interest on construction in progress is ~~provided~~added to the cost of the underlying asset and is depreciated over the estimated useful life of the asset in the same manner as ~~follows:~~

the underlying asset. No interest is capitalized in 2008 and 2009.


~~Land~~			~~Nil~~
~~Land use rights~~			~~15 – 50 years~~
~~Buildings~~			~~5 – 30 years~~
~~Machinery and equipment~~			~~5 – 10 years~~
~~Motor vehicles~~			~~3 – 10 years~~
~~Office equipment~~			~~3 – 10 years~~

~~Depreciation for 2005, 2006 and 2007 amounted to $9,429, $8,989 and $9,079, respectively.~~

~~ASIA PACIFIC WIRE & CABLE CORPORATION LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES~~
~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~
~~(In thousands of US Dollars, except share data)~~


4.	~~SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES~~ ~~(continued)~~

In 2006, the Company terminated the ~~NPC~~Ningbo Pacific joint venture ~~due to lack of profitability, unsatisfactory management practices,~~ and the lack of qualified executives to assume management responsibility following termination of the then senior managers, and the lack of promising prospects for the business in the short to medium term. The Company liquidated its major equipment at the ~~NPC~~Ningbo Pacific facility. ~~The remaining property and equipment have been temporarily classified as ‘‘Assets held for development’’ in its Balance Sheet before~~In October 2009, the Company ~~determines its further plan.~~

has made a resolution to acquire additional 5.42% shareholding of Ningbo Pacific from the Republic of China (“PRC”) joint venture partner. The Company plans to resume manufacturing operation with new constructed facilities at the Ningbo Pacific site. The acquisition of additional shareholding is expected to be completed in July 2010.

Goodwill

Goodwill represents the excess of the cost of purchased business over the fair value of the underlying net assets.

Goodwill, including goodwill associated with equity method investments, is not amortized, but tested for impairment at least annually or more frequently if circumstances indicate that impairment may exist. The Company identifies potential goodwill impairment by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill. The Company determines fair value using a discounted cash flow approach. If the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, goodwill of the reporting unit is not considered impaired. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the amount of goodwill impairment loss, if any, must be measured. The Company measures the amount of goodwill impairment loss by comparing the implied fair value of goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill. If the carrying amount of the reporting unit goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of goodwill, an impairment loss is recognized as an ~~ope rating~~operating expense.

F-15

~~FASB Statement No. 142, ‘‘~~

ASIA PACIFIC WIRE & CABLE CORPORATION LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of U.S. Dollars, except share data)

4. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES(continued)

Goodwill (cont’d)

Goodwill primarily resulted from a business combination. The Company adopted ASC 350,"Intangibles-Goodwill and ~~Other Intangible Assets’’~~Other”, effective January 1, 2002. Under ASC 350, goodwill is no longer amortized but is subject to periodic impairment tests. ASC 350 defines a reporting unit as an operating segment or one level below an operating segment (referred to as a component). A component of an operating segment is a reporting unit if the component constitutes a business for which discrete financial information is available and segment management regularly reviews the operating results of that component. Upon adoption of ~~Statement 142 on January 1, 2002,~~ASC 350, the Company allocated the ~~whole~~entire amount of goodwill to the manufactured products segment.

~~The~~

In accordance with ASC 350, the Company reviews goodwill for impairment on an annual basis (December 31) or more frequently if events or circumstances indicate that the carrying values may not be recoverable. Based on the Company’s assessment ~~was made~~conducted as of December 31, ~~2005, 2006~~2007, 2008 and ~~2007, and~~2009, no impairment was indicated. Total goodwill was $8,801, $8,801 and $8,801 as of December 31, ~~2006~~2007, 2008 and ~~2007,~~2009, respectively.

Investments

Management determines the appropriate classification of its investment at the time of purchase and re-evaluates such designation as of each balance sheet date.

The Company accounts for its long-term investments that represent less than 20 percent ownership using ASC 320, “Investments – Debt and Equity Securities” (ASC 320). Equity securities are classified as available-for-sale, as the Company does not trade in these securities, but rather they are held as longer term investments due to business relationships with the entities. Available-for-sale securities are carried at fair value, with the unrealized gains and losses, net of tax, reported in a separate component of shareholders’ equity. The amortized cost of held-to-maturity debt securities in this category is adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts to maturity. Such amortization is included in investment income. Realized gains and losses and declines in values judged to be other-than-temporary on available-for-sale securities are included in investment income. The cost of securities sold is based on the specific identification method. Interest and dividends on securities classified as available-for-sale are included in investment income.

~~ASIA PACIFIC WIRE & CABLE CORPORATION LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES~~
~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~
~~(In thousands of US Dollars, except share data)~~


4.	~~SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES~~ ~~(continued)~~

Investments in which the Company does not have a controlling interest or an ownership voting interest to exert significant influence, and which are not publicly traded are accounted for at cost.

A judgmental aspect of accounting for investments (including investments in equity investees) involves determining whether an other-than-temporary decline in value of the investment has been sustained. If it has been determined that an investment has sustained an ~~other-than- temporary~~other-than-temporary decline in its value, the investment is written down to its fair value, by a charge to earnings. Such evaluation is dependent on the specific facts and circumstances. Factors that are considered by the Company in determining whether an other-than-temporary decline in value has occurred include: the market value of the security in relation to its cost basis; the financial condition of the investee; and the intent and ability to retain the investment for a sufficient period of time to allow for recovery in the market value of the investment.

In ~~2005, 2006~~2007, 2008 and ~~2007,~~2009, the Company recorded an impairment charge of ~~$3,223,~~$117, $nil and ~~$117,~~$nil, respectively, related to investment in certain equity investees.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

The Company accounts for impairment of long-lived assets in accordance with ASC 360, “Property, Plant and Equipment”. Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that ~~their~~the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. ~~Recoverability of an asset is measured by comparison of~~In such instances, the ~~carrying amount~~Company estimates the undiscounted future cash flows that result from the use of the asset ~~to the net undiscounted future cash flow expected to be generated from the assets.~~and its ultimate disposition. If the ~~future~~sum of the undiscounted cash flows ~~are not sufficient to recover~~is less than the carrying value, the Company recognizes an impairment loss, measured as the amount by which the

F-16

ASIA PACIFIC WIRE & CABLE CORPORATION LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of U.S. Dollars, except share data)

4. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES(continued)

carrying value exceeds the fair value of the asset, ~~the asset’s carrying value is adjusted to fair value. The Company estimates fair value based on~~determined principally using discounted ~~future~~ cash ~~flow.~~

flows.

In ~~2006,~~2009, the Company recorded an impairment charge of ~~$196~~$77 related to the impairment of ~~certain property, plant and equipment of Ningbo Pacific, a subsidiary (note 1) included~~factory in Thailand (included in the manufactured products ~~segment.~~

~~These~~segment) that is not being used for operation. The impairment ~~charges were~~charge was recorded to reduce the carrying value of the identified assets to fair values. Fair values were derived using a variety of methodologies, including cash flow analysis, estimates of sales proceeds and independent appraisals. Where cash flow analyses were used to estimate fair values, key assumptions employed, included estimates of future growth, estimates of gross margins and estimates of the impact of inflation. The charges were primarily the result of management’s revised outlook due to the prolonged ~~unfavourable~~unfavorable market conditions.

Trade Account Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

Trade accounts receivable are stated at ~~the amount the Company expects to collect.~~face value less any allowances for doubtful accounts. The Company maintains allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of its customers to make required payments. Management considers the following factors when determining the ~~collectibility~~collectability of specific customer accounts: customer credit-worthiness, customer financial condition, past transaction history with the customer, current economic industry trends, and changes in customer payment terms. If the financial condition of the Company’s customers were to deteriorate, adversely affecting their ability to make payments, additional allowances would be required. Based on management’s assessment, the Company provides for estimated uncollectible amounts through a charge to earnings and a credit to a valuation allowance. Balances that remain outstanding after the Company has used reasonable collection efforts are written off through a charge to the valuation allowance and a credit to accounts receivable.

Revenue Recognition

Sales represents the invoiced value of goods sold, net of value added tax and returns, commission income earned on distribution activities, and service fee income on installation activities. Revenue

~~ASIA PACIFIC WIRE & CABLE CORPORATION LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES~~
~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~
~~(In thousands of US Dollars, except share data)~~


4.	~~SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES~~ ~~(continued)~~

is recognized to the extent that it is probable that the economic benefits will flow to the Company and the revenue can be reliably measured. The following specific recognition criteria must also be met before revenue is recognized.

Salesof goods and distribution activities

ASC 605-15, “Revenue Recognition-Products”.

The Company classifies shipping and handling costs incurred within cost of sales.

Installation activities

The Company recognizes revenue from installation activities using the percentage-of-completion method, based on the customer certification of the distance of cable laid with respect to the estimated total contract revenue, and in accordance with ~~Statement of Position (SOP) 81-1, ‘‘Accounting for the Performance of Construction-Type~~ASC 605-35, “Revenue Recognition-Construction-Type and ~~Certain~~ Production-Type ~~Contracts’’ issued by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.~~

Contracts”.

When elements such as installation and sale of cables are contained in a single arrangement, or in related arrangements with the same customer, the Company allocates revenue to each element based on its relative fair ~~value.~~value in accordance with ASC 605-25, “Revenue Recognition-Multiple-Element Arrangements”. The allocation of the fair value to the delivered elements is limited to the amount that is not contingent on future delivery of services or subject to customer-specified return or refund privileges.

F-17

~~The Company adopted EITF No. 00-21, ‘‘Accounting for Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables’’ (‘‘EITF 00-21’’) in 2003. The impact~~

ASIA PACIFIC WIRE & CABLE CORPORATION LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of ~~adopting EITF 00-21 was not material to the financial statements in 2005, 2006 and 2007.~~

~~Shipping and Handling Costs~~

~~The Company classifies such costs as cost of sales.~~

U.S. Dollars, except share data)

4. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES(continued)

Product Warranties

The Company provides for the estimated cost of product warranties based on the warranty policy and historical experience, and accrues for specific items at the time their existence is known and the amounts are determinable. Historical warranty liability and related costs have not been significant to the Company’s operations.

Foreign Currency Translation

and Transactions

The ~~Company’s~~ functional currency of the Company’s international subsidiaries is generally the ~~United States dollar and the consolidated financial statements have been presented in United States dollars.~~

~~The financial statements of the Company’s subsidiaries where the~~ local currency isor U.S. Dollars. For these subsidiaries, the functional currency have been translated into United States dollars in accordance with FASB Statement No. 52, ‘‘Foreign Currency Translation.’’ All balance sheet accounts have been translated usingCompany translates the assets and liabilities at exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet ~~dates. Statement of operations amounts have been translated using the~~date and income and expense accounts at average exchange rates ~~in effect~~ during the year. ~~The gains~~Resulting currency translation adjustments are recorded directly to accumulated other comprehensive income within stockholders’ equity. Gains and losses resulting from transactions in non-functional currencies are recorded in the ~~changes in exchange rates from year to year have been reported separately as a component~~consolidated statement of ~~shareholders’ equity.~~

operations.

Foreign currency transactions are recorded at the applicable rates of exchange in effect at the transaction dates. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies at the balance sheet date are translated at the applicable rates of exchange in effect at that date. ~~Exchange differences~~Gains and losses from foreign currency transactions are ~~dealt with~~recorded in the consolidated ~~statements~~statement of operations.

~~ASIA PACIFIC WIRE & CABLE CORPORATION LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES~~
~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~
~~(In thousands of US Dollars, except share data)~~


4.	~~SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES~~ ~~(continued)~~

Foreign Currency Forward Contracts

The Company’s subsidiaries use forward foreign exchange contracts to reduce their exposure to foreign currency risk for liabilities denominated in foreign currency. A forward foreign exchange contract obligates the Company to exchange predetermined amounts of specified foreign currencies at specified exchange rates on specified dates or to make an equivalent USU.S. dollar payment equal to the value of such exchange. Realized and unrealized gains and losses on foreign exchange contracts are included ~~in income~~ as foreign exchange gains or ~~losses.~~

losses in the consolidated statement of operations.

The Company recognizes ~~all~~ derivative financial instruments in the consolidated financial statements at fair value regardless of the purposes or intent for holding the instrument. Changes in the fair value of derivative financial instruments are either recognized periodically in income or in shareholders’ equity as a component of comprehensive income depending on whether the derivative financial instruments qualify for hedge accounting, and if so, whether they qualify as a fair value or cash flow hedge.

Generally, changes in fair values of derivatives accounted for as fair value hedges are recorded in income along with the portions of the changes in the fair value of the hedged items that relate to the hedged risks. Changes in fair value of derivatives accounted for as cash flow hedges, to the extent they are effective as hedges, are recorded in other comprehensive income net of deferred taxes. Changes in fair value of derivatives used as hedges of the net investment in foreign operations are reported in other comprehensive income as part of the cumulative translation adjustment. Changes in fair values of derivatives not qualifying as hedges are reported in income.

As of December 31, ~~2005, 2006~~2007, 2008 and ~~2007,~~2009, the Company has entered into forward exchange sale contracts with notional values of $12,674, $3,500 and $nil, ~~$1,842 and $12,674,~~ respectively. As of December 31, 2008, the Company has entered into forward exchange purchase contracts of $15,458. The forward exchange contracts matured in ~~March, April 2007 and~~ January, February, March and May ~~June 2008. The fair values of the~~2009. There were no outstanding foreign forward exchange contracts as atof December 31, 2005, 2006, and 2007 were $nil, $81 and $nil, respectively, which is included in other assets. These forward exchange contracts are qualified for hedge accounting in accordance with FASB Statement No. 133 ‘‘Accounting for Certain Derivative Instruments and Certain Hedging Activities’’.

~~Gain on Issuance of Shares by Subsidiaries~~

At the time a subsidiary sells its stock to unrelated parties at a price in excess of its book value, the Company’s net investment in that subsidiary increases. If at that time, the subsidiary is not a newly-formed, non-operating entity, nor a research and development, start-up or development stage company, nor is there question as to the subsidiary’s ability to continue in existence, the2009. The Company records the increase as a non-operating gain in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Otherwise, the increase is reflected in ‘‘effect of subsidiaries’ equity transactions’’ in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity.

~~(Loss) Earnings Per Share~~

~~Basic and diluted (loss) earnings per share is calculated in accordance with FASB Statement No. 128, ‘‘Earnings Per Share.’’ There are no potentially dilutive equity instrument.~~

~~Recent Pronouncements~~

~~In September 2006, FASB issued Statement No. 157 — ‘‘Fair Value Measurements’’ Statement No. 157 (‘‘SFAS 157’’) defines~~these contracts at fair value ~~establishes a framework for measuring fair value~~with the related gains and losses in ~~generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The provisions~~statement of this standard apply to other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements. SFAS 157 becomes effective for the Company on January 1, 2008. Upon adoption, the provisions of SFAS 157 are to be applied prospectively with limited exceptions.operations.

F-18

ASIA PACIFIC WIRE & CABLE CORPORATION LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES

Earnings (Loss) Per Share

Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share are calculated in accordance with ASC 260, “Earnings Per Share”. There are no dilutive equity instruments.

Fair Value Measurements

Effective January 1, 2008, the Company adopted the provisions of ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” for ~~Defined Benefit Pension~~financial assets and ~~Other Postretirement Plans — an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R)’’ (‘‘SFAS 158’’), was issued. This statement requires an employer~~liabilities. Under ASC 820, fair value is defined as the price that ~~sponsors one or more defined benefit pension or other postretirement plans~~would have been received to ~~recognize~~sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability ~~for~~(i.e., the ~~overfunded or underfunded status of its postretirement benefit plans~~“exit price”) in ~~its balance sheets for years ending after December 15, 2006. The funded status is measured as~~an orderly transaction between market participants at the ~~difference between the~~measurement date.

In determining fair value, the Company uses various valuation approaches. ASC 820 establishes a hierarchy for inputs used in measuring fair value that maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs by requiring that the most observable inputs be used when available. Observable inputs are inputs that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability developed based on market data obtained from sources independent of the ~~plan’s~~Company. Unobservable inputs are inputs that reflect the Company’s assumptions about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability developed based on the best information available in the circumstances. The hierarchy is broken down into three levels based on the observability of inputs as follows:

Fair Value Measurements (cont’d)

The availability of observable inputs can vary from investment to investment and ~~its benefit obligation.~~ is affected by a wide variety of factors, including, for example, the type of investment, the liquidity of markets and other characteristics particular to the transaction. To the extent that valuation is based on models or inputs that are less observable or unobservable in the market, the determination of fair value requires more judgment and the investments are categorizes as Level 3.

The ~~statement also requires an employer to measure plan assets and benefit obligations as of the date of the employer ’s statement~~carrying amounts of financial ~~position. SFAS 158 is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2006, except for the requirement to measure plan~~instruments carried at cost, including cash and cash equivalents, bank deposits, trade receivables, other current assets, trade payables, related party balances and benefit obligations as of the statement of financial position date, which is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2008. Transition for the recognition provisions is entirely prospective. The effects on the consolidated financial statements upon adopting SFAS 158 is presented in note 18.

~~In September 2006, the FASB ratified EITF Issue No. 06-1 — ‘‘Accounting for Consideration Given by a Service Provider to Manufacturers or Resellers of Equipment Necessary for an End-Customer to Receive Service from the Service Provider’’ (‘‘EITF 06-1’’). This guidance requires the application of EITF Issue No. 01-9 — ‘‘Accounting for Consideration Given by a Vendor to a Customer’’ (‘‘EITF 01-9’’), when consideration is given to a reseller or manufacturer for benefit~~other liabilities approximate their fair value due to the ~~service provider’s end-customer. EITF 01-9 requires the consideration given to be recorded as a liability at the time~~short-term maturities of the sale of the equipment and also provides guidance for the classification of the expense. EITF 06-1 is effective for the first annual reporting period beginning after June 15, 2007. The Company does not expect the adoption of EITF 06-1 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.such instruments.

Recent Pronouncements

The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ~~within those fiscal years. Early~~ending after September 15, 2009. The ASC is an aggregation of previously issued authoritative U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) in one comprehensive set of guidance organized by subject area. In accordance with the ASC, references to previously issued accounting standards have been replaced by ASC references. Subsequent revisions to GAAP will be incorporated into the ASC through Accounting Standards Updates (ASU).

In December 2007, FASB issued ASC 805, “Business Combinations”, which expands on the required disclosures better defines the acquirer and the acquisition date in a business combination, and establishes principles for recognizing and measuring the assets acquired (including goodwill), the liabilities assumed and any non-controlling interests in the acquired business. FASB ASC 805 also requires an acquirer to record an adjustment to income tax expense for changes in valuation allowances or uncertain tax positions related to acquired businesses. FASB ASC 805 is effective for all business combinations with an acquisition date in the first annual period following December 15, 2008; early adoption is ~~prohibited.~~not permitted. The Company adopted this statement as of January 1, 2009 and the adoption has had no impact ~~of this standard is dependant upon~~to the ~~level of future acquisitions.~~

consolidated financial statements.

In December 2007, the FASB ~~issued SFAS No. 160, ‘‘Non-controlling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements — an~~amended ASC 810, “Consolidation”. This amendment ~~of ARB No. 51.’’ SFAS No. 160~~ establishes accounting and reporting standards for the non-controlling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. It clarifies that a non-controlling interest in a subsidiary is an ownership interest in the consolidated entity that should be reported as equity in the consolidated financial statements. ~~Additionally, SFAS No. 160 requires expanded disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. SFAS No. 160~~This amendment is effective for ~~fiscal years, and interim periods within those~~ fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008. The ~~Company is currently assessing~~adoption of this amendment did not have a material impact on the ~~potential impact~~Company’s consolidated results of ~~SFAS No. 160 on its~~operations and financial ~~statements.~~

condition.

In February 2008, the FASB ~~issued FASB Staff Position (‘‘FSP’’) FAS 157-1, ‘‘Application of FASB Statement No. 157 to FASB Statement No. 13~~amended ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Other Accounting Pronouncements That Address Fair Value Measurement for Purpose of Lease Classification of Measurement under Statement 13,’’ which amends SFAS 157 to exclude accounting pronouncements that address fair value measurements for purpose of lease classification or measurement under SFAS No. 13, ‘‘Accounting for Leases.’’ In February 2008, the FASB also issued FSP FAS 157-2, ‘‘Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157’’Disclosures”, which ~~delays~~deferred the effective date of ~~SFAS 157 until the first quarter of fiscal 2010~~ASC 820 for ~~all~~one year for certain non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities, except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually). SFAS 157 d oe not require any new fair value measurements but rather eliminates inconsistencies in guidance found in various prior accounting pronouncements. SFAS 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years.liabilities. The Company ~~is currently assessing~~adopted this statement as of January 1, 2009 and the adoption has had no impact ~~SFAS 157 will have~~ on ~~its~~the Company’s financial position and results of ~~operations and financial position.~~

operations.

In March 2008, the FASB ~~issued SFAS No. 161 (‘‘SFAS 161’’), ‘‘Disclosures about Derivative Instruments~~amended ASC 815, “Derivatives and ~~Hedging Activities, an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 133,’’~~Hedging”, which requires additional disclosures about the objectives of the derivative instruments and hedging activities, the method of accounting for such instruments under ~~SFAS No. 133~~ASC 815 and its related interpretations, and a tabular disclosure of the effects of such instruments and related hedged items on our financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. ~~SFAS 161~~This amendment will be effective for the Company in fiscal year 2010. The Company is currently assessing the potential impact that adoption of ~~SFAS 161~~this amendment may have on its financial statements.

In ~~May~~April 2008, the FASB ~~issued SFAS No. 162 (‘‘SFAS 162’’)~~amended ASC 350,“Intangibles-Goodwill and Other”, ~~‘‘The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles’’~~, the ~~Statement identifies~~factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the ~~sources~~useful life of ~~accounting principles~~a recognized intangible asset under ASC 350. The intent of this amendment is to improve the consistency between the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under ASC 350 and the ~~framework~~period of expected cash flows used to measure the fair value of the asset under ASC 805, “Business Combinations,” and other U.S. GAAP. This amendment will be effective for ~~selecting~~ the ~~principles to be used in~~Company for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is prohibited. The adoption of this amendment did not have a material impact on the ~~preparation~~Company’s consolidated results of operations and financial statements of nongovernmental entities that are presented in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) in the United States (the GAAP hierarchy). The current GAAP hierarchy, as set forth in the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) Statement on Auditing Standards No. 69, The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity With Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, has been criticized because (1) it is directed to the auditor rather than the entity, (2) it is complex, and (3) it ranks FASB Statements of Financial Accounting Concepts, which are subject to the same level of due process as FASB Statements of Financial Accounting Standards, below industry practices that are widely recognized as generally accepted but that are not subject to due process. The Board believes that the GAAP hierarchy should be directed to entities because it is the entity (not its auditor) that is responsible for selecting accounting principles for financial statements that are presented in conformity withcondition.

Recent Pronouncements (cont’d)

In September 2008, the ~~Board~~FASB amended ASC 815, “Derivatives and Hedging”, which requires disclosures by sellers of credit derivatives, including credit derivatives embedded in a hybrid instrument. This amendment requires an additional disclosure about the current status of the payment/performance risk of a guarantee. This amendment applies to credit derivatives within the scope of ASC 815, hybrid instruments that have embedded credit derivatives, and guarantees within the scope of ASC 460, “Guarantees”. This amendment also pertains to hybrid instruments that have embedded credit derivatives (for example, credit-linked notes). The provisions of this amendment is effective for reporting periods (annual or interim) ending after November 15, 2008. This amendment encourages early adoption to facilitate comparisons at initial adoption. In periods after initial adoption, this amendment requires comparative disclosures only for periods ending subsequent to initial adoption. The adoption of this amendment did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated results of operations and financial condition.

In November 2008, the FASB amended ASC 323, “Investments-Equity Method and Joint Ventures” , to clarify the accounting for certain transactions and impairment considerations involving equity method investments. The FASB and the IASB concluded a joint effort in converging the accounting for business combinations as well as the accounting and reporting for non-controlling interests culminating in the issuance of certain provision of ASC 805. The objective of that joint effort was not to reconsider the accounting for equity method investments; however, the application of the equity method is affected by the accounting for business combinations and the accounting for consolidated subsidiaries, which were affected by the issuance of certain provisions of ASC 805. The amendment is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years, consistent with the effective dates of certain provision of ASC 805. This amendment shall be applied prospectively. Earlier application by an entity that has previously adopted an alternative accounting policy is not permitted. The adoption of this amendment did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In April 2009, the FASB amended ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures”, in which, if an entity determines that the ~~GAAP hierarchy~~level of activity for an asset or liability has significantly decreased and that a transaction is not orderly, further analysis of transactions or quoted prices is needed, and a significant adjustment to the transaction or quoted prices may be necessary to estimate fair value in accordance with FASB ASC 820. The Company adopted this amendment and there was no material impact on the financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In May 2009, the FASB issued ASC 855, “Subsequent Events”. This Standard sets forth: 1) the period after the balance sheet date during which management of a reporting entity should ~~reside~~evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in the ~~accounting literature established by~~financial statements; 2) the ~~FASB~~circumstances under which an entity should recognize events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial statements; and ~~is issuing this Statement to achieve~~3) the disclosures that ~~result.~~an entity should make about events or transactions that occurred after the balance sheet date. This Statement is effective ~~60 days following~~for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. The Company adopted this statement and there was no impact on the ~~SEC’s approval~~financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

ASIA PACIFIC WIRE & CABLE CORPORATION LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of U.S. Dollars, except share data)

4. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES(continued)

Recent Pronouncements (cont’d)

In June 2009, the ~~Public Company~~FASB issued the Update No. 2009-01-Topic 105-Generally Accepted Accounting ~~Oversight Board amendments to AU Section 411, The Meaning~~Principles-amendments based on-Statement of ~~Present Fairly in Conformity With~~Financial Accounting Standards No. 168-The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.

~~In May 2008,~~ The FASB Accounting Standards Codification will become the source of authoritative U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) recognized by the FASB ~~issued SFAS No. 163 (‘‘SFAS 163’’), ‘‘Accounting~~to be applied by nongovernmental entities. Rules and interpretive releases of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) under authority of federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for ~~Financial Guarantee Insurance Contracts’’, a interpretation~~SEC registrants. On the effective date of ~~FASB~~this Statement, ~~No. 60. Diversity exists in practice in~~the Codification will supersede all then-existing non-SEC accounting ~~for financial guarantee insurance contracts by insurance enterprises under FASB Statement No. 60, Accounting~~ and ~~Reporting by Insurance Enterprises. That diversity results in inconsistencies~~reporting standards. All other non-grandfathered non-SEC accounting literature not included in the recognition and measurement of claim liabilities because of differing views about when a loss has been incurred under FASB Statement No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies. This Statement requires that an insurance enterprise recognize a claim liability prior to an event of default (insured event) when there is evidence that credit deterioration has occurred in an insured financial obligation. This Statement also clarifies how Statement 60 applies to financial guarantee insurance contracts, including the recognition an d measurement to be used to account for premium revenue and claim liabilities. Those clarificationsCodification will increase comparability in financial reporting of financial guarantee insurance contracts by insurance enterprises. This Statement requires expanded disclosures about financial guarantee insurance contracts. The accounting and disclosure requirements of the Statement will improve the quality of information provided to users of financial statements.become non-authoritative. This Statement is effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. The Company has adopted and updated the accounting standards reference started in Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2009.

In October 2009, the FASB issued ASU No. 2009-13, “Multiple Deliverable Revenue Arrangements — a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force” (ASU 2009-13) (codified within ASC Topic 605 “Revenue Recognition”). ASU 2009-13 addresses the accounting for multiple-deliverable arrangements to enable vendors to account for products or services (deliverables) separately rather than as a combined unit. ASU 2009-13 is effective prospectively for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that the adoption of the amendments to the FASB Accounting Standards Codification resulting from ASU 2009-13 may have on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-06, “Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements” (ASU 2010-06) (codified within ASC 820 “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures”). ASU 2010-06 improves disclosures originally required under ASC 820. ASU 2010-06 is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements in the roll forward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. Those disclosures are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, ~~2008,~~2010, and ~~all~~for interim periods within those fiscal years, except for some disclosures about the insurance enterprise’s risk-management activities. This Statement requires that disclosures about the risk-management activities of the insurance enterprise be effective for the first period (including interim periods) beginning after issuance of this Statement. Except for those disclosures, earlier application is not permitted.years. The Company ~~does not expect~~is currently evaluating the impact that the adoption of ~~SFAS 163~~the amendments to the FASB Accounting Standards Codification resulting from ASU 2010-06 may have ~~a material impact~~ on ~~its~~the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

F-22


5.	~~SHORT-TERM BANK DEPOSITS~~

ASIA PACIFIC WIRE & CABLE CORPORATION LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES


	As of December 31
	2008		2009
Unrestricted short-term bank deposits	$	7,756	$	–
Restricted short-term bank deposits		15,033		13,145


	$	22,789	$	13,145

Unrestricted short-term bank deposits represent bank deposits which do not qualify as cash equivalents. Restricted short-term bank deposits represent the amounts of cash pledged by ~~two~~four subsidiaries to secure credit facilities granted by financial institutions. ~~Unrestricted short-term bank deposits represents bank deposits which do not qualify as cash equivalents.~~

~~The~~

These bank deposits bear interest rates ranging from 1%0.325% to ~~5.1%~~4.6% and 0.15% to 1.98% per ~~annum.~~

~~ASIA PACIFIC WIRE & CABLE CORPORATION LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES~~
~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~
~~(In thousands of US Dollars, except share data)~~


6.	~~GOODWILL~~

~~Goodwill of $8,801 (2006: $8,801; 2005: $8,324) relates to the manufactured products segment and the changes in the carrying value of goodwill~~annum for the ~~years ended~~year 2008 and 2009, respectively.

As at December 31, ~~2005, 2006~~2008 and ~~2007 are as follows :~~

Balance, December 31, 2005 $ 8,324
Goodwill acquired 477
Balance, December 31, 2006 8,801
Goodwill acquired —
Balance, December 31, 2007 $ 8,801


7.	~~INVESTMENTS~~

~~On December 31, 2006 and 2007,~~2009, the Company held available-for-sale securities issued by a minority shareholder of two of the Operating Subsidiaries.

The following is a summary of these available-for-sale securities:


	Available-for-sale securities
			Gross		Gross			Estimated
			Unrealized		Unrealized			Fair
	Cost		Gains		Losses			Value
December 31, 2008 Quoted equity securities	$	392	$	–	$	(324	)	$	68

December 31, 2009 Quoted equity securities	$	413	$	–	$	(307	)	$	106

The security above represents investment in TT&T Public Company Limited (TT&T), which has been in a continuous unrealized loss position for more than 12 months. TT&T is listed on the Stock Exchange of Thailand. Its principal activity is the operation of a provincial telephone network throughout Thailand and services include, fixed line telephone, pay phone, data communication and distribution of telephone equipment.

ASIA PACIFIC WIRE & CABLE CORPORATION LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES

A summary of the carrying values and balance sheet classification of all investments in ~~debt,~~ equity securities and available-for-sale securities disclosed above was as follows:


	December 31,						As of December 31
	2006			2007			2008		2009
Available-for-sale equity securities		$	232		$	201
Held-to-maturity debt securities			—			2,354
Available-for-sale securities							$	68	$	106


Short-term investments			232			2,555		68		106


Equity securities in privately-held companies and other investments			533			650		544		580


Long-term investments			533			650		544		580


Total investments		$	765		$	3,205	$	612	$	686

There were realized gains of $28, $nil ~~$343~~ and ~~$28~~$nil on disposal of available-for-sale securities in ~~2005, 2006~~2007, 2008 and ~~2007,~~2009, respectively. The disposal of available-for-sale securities was for a consideration of $65, $14 and $nil ~~$626~~in 2007, 2008 and ~~$65 in 2005, 2006 and 2007,~~2009, respectively. The net adjustment to unrealized holding ~~gains (losses)~~losses on available-for-sale securities included as a separate component of shareholders’ equity, net of income tax (expense) benefit of $(6), $(46) and $15 in 2007, 2008 and 2009, respectively.

The long-term investments in non-marketable securities are valued at ~~income taxes, totaled, $(505), $(64)~~cost net of allowance for impairment (if any). The long-term investment consists of the investment in a privately owned Thai company which is engaged in the fabrication of copper rods. There is no impairment recognized in 2008 and ~~$(6)~~2009 because there is no event or change in ~~2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively.~~

~~The held-to-maturity investment as~~circumstances that may have had a significant adverse effect on the fair value of ~~December 31, 2007 bears interest at 3.0% per annum and will mature in June 2008.~~

the investment. See Note 13 – Financial Instruments.

~~ASIA PACIFIC WIRE & CABLE CORPORATION LIMITED~~7. BANK LOANS AND ~~SUBSIDIARIES~~
~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~
~~(In thousands of US Dollars, except share data)~~


8.	~~BANK LOANS~~

OVERDRAFTS

Under line of credit arrangements for short-term debt with the Company’s bankers, the Company may borrow up to approximately ~~$252,099 (2006: $110,994)~~$279,863 (2008: $248,749) on such terms as the Company and the banks may mutually agree upon. These arrangements do not have termination dates but are reviewed annually for renewal. As of December 31, ~~2007,~~2009, the unused portion of the credit lines was approximately ~~$134,811 (2006: $59,915)~~$211,244 (2008: $140,756), which included unused letters of credit amounting to ~~$98,089 (2006: $24,077)~~$141,235 (2008: $93,499). Letters of credit are issued by the Company ~~during~~in the ordinary course of business through major financial institutions as required by certain vendor contracts. As of December 31, ~~2007,~~2009, the Company had open letters of credit totaling ~~$80,693 (2006: $18,730)~~$30,870 (2008: $57,976). Liabilities relating to the letters of credit are included in current liabilities.

The credit lines of the Company were collateralized by:

ASIA PACIFIC WIRE & CABLE CORPORATION LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of U.S. Dollars, except share data)

7. BANK LOANS AND OVERDRAFTS(continued)


	(ii)	~~Mortgage of the assets with total carrying amount of $nil at December 31, 2007 of a subsidiary of the Company (2006: $1,414);~~

~~The subsidiary has ceased its business operation in May 2007 and all the bank facilities were cancelled as of November 30, 2007.~~


	~~(iii)~~	Pledge of short-term deposits of ~~$18,714~~$13,145 at December 31, ~~2007 (2006: $13,587)~~2009 (2008: $15,033);



	~~(iv)~~(iii)		Joint and several personal guarantees from certain directors of a subsidiary of the Company; and


	~~(v)~~(vi)		Corporate guarantees issued by the Company, a subsidiary of the Company and the holding company.

The weighted average interest rates on bank loans and overdrafts as of December 31, ~~2006~~2007, 2008 and ~~2007~~2009 were ~~5.9%~~6.1%, 5.3% and ~~6.1%~~4.4% per annum, respectively.


9.	~~LONG-TERM DEBT~~

December 31,
2006 2007
Bank loan $ 1,577 $ —
Less: Current portion (1,577 ) —
Long-term debt $ — $ —

During 2005, 2006 and 2007, interest paid totaled $237, $339 and $23, respectively. The bank loan on December 31, 2006 is secured by land and buildings of a subsidiary of the Company with a net book value of $2,655 as of December 31, 2006; a mortgage debenture over all of the subsidiary’s assets and uncalled capital and requires the Company to maintain a minimum of 85% holding in this subsidiary.

~~The loan as of December 31, 2006 bore interest at the commercial bill rate plus 1%, and the weighted average interest rate on commercial bills during 2006 was 8.4%.~~

~~The above loan matured and was repaid in February 2007.~~

8. DISTRIBUTION OF EARNINGS

~~ASIA PACIFIC WIRE & CABLE CORPORATION LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES~~
~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~
~~(In thousands of US Dollars, except share data)~~


~~10.~~	~~DISTRIBUTION OF EARNINGS~~

The Company’s ability to pay dividends is primarily dependent on the Company receiving distributions from the Operating Subsidiaries and the equity investee companies.

As described in Note 2 – Basis of Presentation, the earnings reflected in the financial statements prepared in accordance with US GAAP differ from those reflected in the statutory financial statements of the Company’s subsidiaries and equity investee companies. In accordance with the relevant laws and regulations applicable to the Company’s subsidiaries and equity investee companies, the earnings available for distribution are based on their respective statutory financial statements. At December 31, ~~2006,~~2008, the amount of the Company’s retained earnings available for distribution was approximately ~~$22,124~~$14,709 and the consolidated retained earnings of the Company investee companies, which included $(3,084), ~~$(1,003)~~$(734), ~~$(723), $442~~$586 and ~~$(22)~~$(175) of the accumulated (losses) profits of Lox Pac, ~~Thai Professional,~~ SPHC, SPRC and Shandong Huayu, respectively. At December 31, ~~2007,~~2009, the amount of the Company’s retained earnings available for distribution was approximately ~~$27,126~~$24,814 and the consolidated retained ~~earnin gs~~earnings included $(3,084), ~~$(1,003)~~$(734), ~~$(729), $695~~$571 and ~~$(145)~~$(200) of the accumulated (losses) profits of Lox Pac, ~~Thai Professional,~~ SPHC, SPRC and Shandong Huayu, respectively.

F-25


~~11.~~	~~VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS~~


	Balance at		Net charge (credit)						Currency translation			Balance at end of
Description	beginning of year		to income			Deduction			adjustment			year
Year ended December 31, 2007:
Allowance for doubtful accounts	$	9,290	$	3,295		$	(2,172	)	$	1,072		$	11,485
Allowance for inventories
- Net realizable value		3,508		(363	)		—			102			3,247
- Obsolescence		2,484		(909	)		—			200			1,775
Allowance for deferred tax assets		4,341		(3,158	)		—			302			1,485

	$	19,623	$	(1,135	)	$	(2,172	)	$	1,676		$	17,992

Year ended December 31, 2008:
Allowance for doubtful accounts	$	11,485	$	12		$	(1,031	)	$	(822	)	$	9,644
Allowance for inventories
- Net realizable value		3,247		25,144			(142	)		(1,967	)		26,282
- Obsolescence		1,775		1			(1,164	)		(179	)		433
Allowance for deferred tax assets		1,485		5,227			—			(29	)		6,683

	$	17,992	$	30,384		$	(2,337	)	$	(2,997	)	$	43,042

Year ended December 31, 2009:
Allowance for doubtful accounts	$	9,644	$	(860	)	$	(326	)	$	236		$	8,694
Allowance for inventories
- Net realizable value		26,282		(24,268	)		42			1,158			3,214
- Obsolescence		433		319			(6	)		35			781
Allowance for deferred tax assets		6,683		(4,781	)		—			587			2,489

	$	43,042	$	(29,590	)	$	(290	)	$	2,016		$	15,178

During 2008, the decreases in commodity prices, including that of copper, resulted in a write-down of the ~~wire & cable industry, the Company evaluates the inventory in all of its product lines on a periodic basis. As a result, a recovery for inventory obsolescence of $909 was recognized, as a credit to~~carrying cost of ~~sales, for~~ the ~~year ended~~Company’s inventory as of December 31, ~~2007~~2008. Copper prices on the London Metal Exchange (the “LME”) fell from an average monthly high of $8,685 per metric ton in April 2008 to only $3,072 per metric ton in December 2008. In addition, sales towards the end of 2008 decreased due to the worldwide economic slowdown, which resulted in a higher inventory level at year end. The decline in commodity prices and ~~a reserve for obsolescence of $145 and $896 were recognized for the years ended~~our high inventory levels at December 31, ~~2005 and 2006, respectively. In addition,~~2008 resulted in an allowance of $25,144 for inventory write-down to net realizable value, ~~of $201 and $1,121 were charged to~~which was included in the cost of sales in ~~2005 and 2006, respectively. During 2007, a decrease of $363 in the net realizable value~~2008. The allowance ~~was also recognized, as a credit to cost of sales,~~ for ~~finished goods written down~~inventory write-down to net realizable value ~~in previous years, which were sold at above net realizable value in 2007. The allowance for inventory losses~~ is based on the Company’s best estimates of product sales prices and customer ~~demand patterns, and its plans~~demands. During 2009, the copper prices on the LME have gradually risen from $3,220 in January 2009 to ~~tr ansition its products. The estimate used by the Company to determine its allowance for inventory losses may be more or less than the actual amount or results.~~$6,981 in December 2009.

ASIA PACIFIC WIRE & CABLE CORPORATION LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of U.S. Dollars, except share data)

10. INCOME TAXES

Under current Bermuda law, the Company is not subject to tax on income or capital gains, ~~and no Bermuda~~nor is withholding tax isof Bermuda imposed upon payments of dividends by the Company to its shareholders.

The Company’s investments in the Operating Subsidiaries are held through subsidiaries incorporated in the British Virgin Islands ~~(‘‘BVI’’~~(“BVI”). Under current BVI law, dividends from the BVI subsidiaries’ investments are not subject to income taxes and no withholding tax is imposed on payments of dividends by the BVI subsidiaries to the Company.

The Operating Subsidiaries and equity investees are governed by the income tax laws of Singapore, Thailand, Australia, the People’s Republic of China and Myanmar. The corporate income tax rate in Singapore was ~~20%~~18%, ~~20%~~18% and ~~18%~~17% for ~~2005, 2006~~2007, 2008 and ~~2007,~~2009, respectively, and there is no withholding tax on dividends applicable to the Company. For Thailand, the corporate income tax rate was 30% for each of the three years ended December 31, ~~2007~~2009 and a withholding tax of 10% is levied on dividends received by the Company. In Australia, the corporate income tax rate was 30% for ~~2005/2006, 2006/2007~~2007/2008, 2008/2009 and ~~2007/2008~~2009/2010 tax years. The applicable corporate income tax rate for the subsidiaries in the People’s Republic of China was 33% for ~~each of the three years ended December 31, 2007.~~2007, and 25% for 2008 and 2009. The corporate income tax rate for Myanmar was 30% for ~~2005/2006, 2006/2007~~2007/2008, 2008/2009 and ~~2007/2008~~2009/2010 tax years.

Pursuant to the ~~income tax law~~Corporate Income Tax Law (the CIT Law) of the PRC ~~concerning foreign investment enterprises and various local income tax laws (the Income Tax Law),~~that came into effect on January 1, 2008, all the enterprises generally are subject to corporate income tax at an effective rate of ~~33% (30% state income taxes plus 3% local income taxes)~~25% on income as reported in their statutory accounts ~~unless the~~(2007: 33%). An enterprise is located in specially-designated regions or cities and eligible for ~~which more favorable effective rates apply.~~

the preferential policy in the form of a reduced tax rate shall have five years from the time when the CIT Law takes effect to transition progressively to the legally prescribed tax rate. During this period, an enterprise that enjoyed the 15% corporate income tax rate shall be subject to the 18% tax rate for the year 2008, 20% for the year 2009, 22% for the year 2010, 24% for the year 2011, and 25% for the year 2012.

PEWS is located in Shenzhen, which is a region where preferential tax rates apply and currently qualifies for a reduced rate of taxation of 15% ~~(50% of~~, 18%, and 20% for the ~~full rate of 30% State income taxes~~years 2007, 2008, and ~~no local income taxes).~~2009, respectively. PEWS ~~qualifies~~qualified for a further reduced rate of 10% if export revenues exceed 70% of its total ~~revenues.~~revenues for 2007. PEWS is ~~exempt from income tax~~the only subsidiary of the Company in the PRC that qualifies for the two years starting from its first profitable year of operations (2001). PEWS is entitled to a 50% tax exemption from the State income taxes for a further three-year period (2003 to 2005) under the Income Tax Law. With the preferential tax ~~rate, current income tax liabilities of PEWS were reduced by approximately $317 for~~rates under the ~~year ended December 31, 2007. The preferential tax rate also increased the net income per share by $0.02 for the year ended December 31, 2007.~~CIT Law.

F-27

Pre-tax income (loss) from continuing operations was taxed in the following jurisdictions:


	Year ended December 31,												Year ended December 31,
	2005				2006				2007				2007			2008			2009
Thailand		$	10,122			$	25,524			$	9,116		$	7,973		$	(14,453	)	$	10,921
Singapore			(6,633	)			(2,652	)			3,169			1,230			(712	)		3,149
Australia			1,111				2,811				6,255			6,255			2,731			3,020
The People’s Republic of China			1,177				10,323				1,318			2,723			(5,293	)		4,840
British Virgin Islands			(218	)			(1,290	)			(3,143	)
Bermuda			(4,043	)			(2,229	)			(3,679	)
Others														(5,145	)		(2,199	)		(2,318	)


			1,516				32,487				13,036			13,036			(19,926	)		19,612
Equity investees
Thailand			1				—				—			(6	)		—			—
The People’s Republic of China			169				—				(123	)		130			(142	)		(40	)
British Virgin Islands			—				73				247
			170				73				124
		$	1,686			$	32,560			$	13,160
														124			(142	)		(40	)


													$	13,160		$	(20,068	)	$	19,572

Significant components of the provision (benefit) for income taxes are as follows:


	Year ended December 31,
	2007			2008			2009
Allocated to net income (loss)

Current:
Thailand	$	5,701		$	1,514		$	813
Singapore		194			132			—
The People’s Republic of China		662			(679	)		1,511
Australia		1,710			1,310			680


Total current		8,267			2,277			3,004


Deferred:
Thailand		(2,128	)		(865	)		1,723
Singapore		(3	)		—			100
The People’s Republic of China		(56	)		1,135			389
Australia		218			(415	)		128


Total deferred		(1,969	)		(145	)		2,340


	$	6,298		$	2,132		$	5,344


Allocated to other comprehensive loss	$	(6	)	$	(27	)	$	18

ASIA PACIFIC WIRE & CABLE CORPORATION LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES

At December 31, ~~2005, 2006~~2007, 2008 and ~~2007,~~2009, the Operating Subsidiaries had net operating loss carry forwards of approximately ~~$19,375, $19,460~~$5,970, $16,643 and ~~$5,970,~~$34,750, respectively. The remaining net operating losses can be carried forward, ~~indefinitely,~~ subject to any condition to be met under the relevant tax laws of the respective jurisdictions. The utilization of these net operating loss carry forwards is subject to agreement by the income tax authorities in the respective jurisdictions.

The parent company’s tax is filed in Bermuda, which does not have a statutory tax rate. Therefore the provision for income taxes differs based on the taxes incurred by the Operating Subsidiaries,

~~ASIA PACIFIC WIRE & CABLE CORPORATION LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES~~
~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~
~~(In thousands of US Dollars, except share data)~~


~~12.~~	~~INCOME TAXES~~ ~~(continued)~~

in their respective jurisdiction. The principal reasons for the differences are listed in the following table:


	Year ended December 31,												Year ended December 31,
	2005				2006				2007				2007			2008			2009
Higher statutory tax rate in:
Income tax (benefit) at statutory tax rate in:
Thailand		$	3,037			$	5,869			$	1,966		$	1,966		$	(3,887	)	$	3,238
Singapore			(1,327	)			(530	)			634			634			(128	)		562
Australia			333				843				1,899			1,899			830			915
People’s Republic of China			(421	)			1,411				305			305			(763	)		1,520
			1,622				7,593				4,804
														4,804			(3,948	)		6,235

Expenses not deductible for tax purposes			1,517				4,541				4,163			4,163			894			2,385
Changes in valuation allowance			882				(1,686	)			(2,856	)		(2,856	)		5,198			(4,194	)
Deferred tax liability arising from undistributed earnings under APB 23 (codified in ASC 740)														—			—			402
Others			(161	)			(191	)			187			187			(12	)		516

Total charge for the year		$	3,860			$	10,257			$	6,298		$	6,298		$	2,132		$	5,344

Deferred tax liabilities and assets ~~are~~ comprised of the following:


	As of December 31
	2008			2009
Deferred tax liabilities:

Tax over book depreciation	$	(275	)	$	—
Book over tax basis in subsidiaries		(1,022	)		(1,007	)
Undistributed earnings under APB 23 (codified in ASC 740)		—			(402	)


Total deferred tax liabilities		(1,297	)		(1,409	)

Deferred tax assets:
Unused tax losses and unused tax credits		837			2,024
Allowance for doubtful accounts		2,540			2,353
Allowance for inventories		7,365			1,109
Allowance for impairment in investment		540			523
Others		97			92

Total deferred tax assets		11,379			6,101

Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets (note 9)		(6,683	)		(2,489	)


Total deferred tax assets		4,696			3,612


Net deferred tax assets	$	3,399		$	2,203

The amount of deferred tax liabilities and assets at December 31, ~~2006~~2008 and ~~2007~~2009 were as follows:


	December 31,								As of December 31,
	2006				2007				2008			2009
Gross current deferred tax liabilities		$	(1,074	)		$	(561	)	$	(72	)	$	(57	)

Gross current deferred tax assets			2,680				4,312			10,092			3,720
Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets			(1,632	)			(1,254	)		(7,028	)		(1,068	)
			1,048				3,058
Net current deferred tax (liabilities) assets			(26	)			2,497
Gross long-term deferred tax liabilities			(1,225	)			(1,225	)
Gross long-term deferred tax assets			5,245				2,213
										3,063			2,652


Net current deferred tax assets										2,991			2,595


Gross non-current deferred tax liabilities										(1,225	)		(1,352	)

Gross non-current deferred tax assets										1,633			2,381
Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets			(2,709	)			(231	)		—			(1,421	)
			2,536				1,982
Net long-term deferred tax assets			1,311				757
										1,632			960


Net non-current deferred tax assets										408			(392	)


Net deferred tax assets		$	1,285			$	3,254		$	3,399		$	2,203

The deferred tax liabilities and assets are presented in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as follows:


	December 31,								December 31,
	2006				2007				2008			2009
Current
Deferred tax assets		$	490			$	2,481		$	3,064		$	2,595
Deferred tax liabilities			(516	)			(561	)		(65	)		—


Total current			(26	)			1,920			2,999			2,595
Long-term


Non-current
Deferred tax assets			2,039				2,032			1,182			613
Deferred tax liabilities			(728	)			(698	)		(782	)		(1,005	)
Total long-term			1,311				1,334


Total non-current										400			(392	)


Net deferred tax assets		$	1,285			$	3,254		$	3,399		$	2,203

Undistributed earnings of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries included in the Company’s retained earnings amounted to approximately ~~$17,101, $30,000~~$31,839, $18,337 and ~~$32,697~~$28,468 as of December 31, ~~2005, 2006~~2007, 2008 and ~~2007,~~2009, respectively. Upon distribution of those earnings in the form of dividends or otherwise, the Company would be subject to withholding taxes payable to the respective foreign countries. Except for earnings relating to ~~a subsidiary~~the subsidiaries in Thailand and China, the Company has no intention of distributing the earnings that are subject to withholding taxes. Withholding taxes of approximately ~~$1,327~~$304 and corporate income tax approximately $98 would be payable upon remittance of all previously unremitted earnings of ~~that subsidiary,~~the two subsidiaries, to the extent allowed by the subsidiary’s articles of association, as of December 31, ~~2007.~~2009.

ASIA PACIFIC WIRE & CABLE CORPORATION LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of U.S. Dollars, except share data)

10. INCOME TAXES(continued)

The management estimated and accrued a tax provision in the amount of ~~$158, $887~~$nil and ~~$156~~$71 during ~~2005, 2006~~2008 and ~~2007~~2009 as the Company determined that it is more-likely-than-not that income derived from certain activities may be subject to taxes in offshore locations that have a higher tax rate.

The accrued tax provisions were recorded in income tax liabilities.

Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income

~~ASIA PACIFIC WIRE & CABLE CORPORATION LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES~~
~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~
~~(In thousands of US Dollars, except share data)~~


~~12.~~	~~INCOME TAXES~~ ~~(continued)~~

tax purposes. The Company had deferred tax assets totaling approximately ~~$7,925~~$11,379 and ~~$6,525~~$6,101 at December 31, ~~2006~~2008 and ~~2007,~~2009, respectively. However, realization of all of these deferred assets is not reasonably assured; therefore, they were reserved by a valuation allowance of ~~$4,341~~$6,683 and ~~$1,485~~$2,489 at December 31, ~~2006~~2008 and ~~2007,~~2009, respectively.

The net change in valuation allowance for the years ended December 31, ~~2005, 2006~~2007, 2008 and ~~2007~~2009 was an increase (decrease) of approximately ~~$882, $(1,686)~~$(2,856), $5,198 and ~~$(2,856),~~$(4,194) respectively, resulting primarily from net operating (gains) losses generated during the respective years.

~~On July 13, 2006,~~

In 2007, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48, ‘‘Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes — An Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109’’ (‘‘FIN 48’’). FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an entity’s financial statements in accordance with FASB Statement No. 109, ‘‘Accounting for Income Taxes’’ and prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attributes for financial statement disclosure of tax positions taken or expected to be taken on a tax return. Under FIN 48, the impact of an uncertain income tax position on the income tax return must be recognized at the largest amount that is more-likely-than-not to be sustained upon audit by the relevant taxing authority. An uncertain income tax position will not be recognized if it has less than a 50% likelihood of being sustained. Additionally, FIN 48 provides guidanc e on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006.

~~The~~ Company adopted the provisions of ~~FIN~~Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation No. 48 (FIN 48), “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes-an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109.” (codified within FASB Accounting Standards Codification 740, “Income Taxes”). These provisions contain a two-step approach to recognizing and measuring uncertain tax positions. The first step is to evaluate the tax position for recognition by determining if the weight of available evidence indicates it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained on audit, including resolution of related appeals or litigation processes, if any. The second step is to measure the tax benefit as the largest amount, which is more than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. The Company considers many factors when evaluating and estimating its tax positions and tax benefits, which may require periodic adjustments and which may not accurately anticipate actual outcomes.

The Company adopted these provisions on January 1, 2007. The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits as of the date of adoption was $220. This amount does not include the unrecognized tax benefits of CCH (HK) as it has been accounted for in the CCH (HK)’s accounts and thus already included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. The Company’s practice is to recognize interest and/or penalties related to income tax matters as a component of income tax expenses. Upon adoption ~~of FIN 48~~these provisions on January 1, 2007, the Company recognized $1,774 of interest and penalties. As a result of the implementation of ~~FIN 48~~these provisions on January 1, 2007, the Company recognized a reduction to retained earnings of $1,889. As a result of the implementation of ~~FIN 48,~~these provisions, the Company recognized a $105 decrease in deferred tax assets and a corresponding decrease in the valuation allowance. As of January 1, 2007, the amount of unrecognized tax benefits included in the balance sheet that would, if recognized, affect the effective tax rate is $115.

As of December 31, ~~2007,~~2008 and 2009, the Company is subject to taxation in The People’s Republic of China, Hong Kong, Australia, Thailand, and Singapore. The Company’s tax years for ~~1998~~1999 and forward are subject to examination by the tax authorities in the jurisdictions where the Company is subject to taxation.

A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amounts of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows:


	December 31,
Change in Uncertain Tax Positions	2008			2009
Balance at January 1	$	475		$	422
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year		—			—
Additions for tax positions of prior years		5			—
Settlements		(58	)		—


Balance at December 31	$	422		$	422

F-31

ASIA PACIFIC WIRE & CABLE CORPORATION LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of U.S. Dollars, except share data)

10. INCOME TAXES(continued)

The balance of unrecognized tax benefits, the amount of related interest and penalties the Company have provided in the next 12 months, were:


	December 31,
	2008			2009
Unrecognized tax benefits	$	422		$	422
Less: valuation allowance		(346	)		(346	)

If recognized, affect the effective tax rate	$	76		$	76

Accrued interest on unrecognized tax benefits	$	1,661		$	1,806
Accrued penalties on unrecognized tax benefits		879			1,299

Total accrued interest and penalties on unrecognized tax benefits	$	2,540		$	3,105

As of December 31, ~~2007,~~2008 and 2009, the amount of unrecognized tax benefits included in the balance sheet that would, if recognized, affect the effective tax rate is ~~$130.~~$76 and $76, respectively. The Company recognized ~~$440~~$391 and $565 in interest and penalties during ~~2007.~~2008 and 2009. As of December 31, ~~2007,~~2008 and 2009, the Company recognized ~~$2,214~~$2,540 and $3,105, respectively of interest and penalties.

11. ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

The components of accumulated other comprehensive loss are as follows:


				Unrealized
				gains
				(losses) on
	Currency			available-
	translation			for- sale
	adjustments			securities			Others			Total
Balance at January 1, 2007	$	(19,563	)	$	125		$	—		$	(19,438	)

Other comprehensive income (loss)		15,179			(34	)		(71	)		15,074


Balance at December 31, 2007		(4,384	)		91			(71	)		(4,364	)

Other comprehensive income (loss)		(8,994	)		(18	)		7			(9,005	)


Balance at December 31, 2008		(13,378	)		73			(64	)		(13,369	)

Other comprehensive income (loss)		3,177			1			(4	)		3,174


Balance at December 31, 2009	$	(10,201	)	$	74		$	(68	)	$	(10,195	)

F-32

The Company leases a piece of land in Singapore and certain buildings under non-cancellable operating lease arrangements for terms from 5 to 30 years.

Future minimum payments under capital leases and non-cancellable operating leases with initial terms of one year or more consisted of the following as of December 31, ~~2007:~~

2009:


	Capital Leases				Operating Leases			Capital Leases			Operating Leases
2008		$	161			$	425
2009			194				157
2010			—				136	$	173		$	654
2011			—				136		83			604
2012			—				136		60			589
2013									54			540
2014									3			370
Thereafter			—				2,451		—			2,532


Total minimum lease payments		$	355			$	3,441	$	373		$	5,289


Amounts representing interest			(29	)					(35	)


Present value of net minimum lease payments		$	326					$	338

Rental expense consisted of the following:

2005 2006 2007
Rentals under operating lease $ 671 $ 738 $ 766


	2007		2008		2009
Rentals under operating lease	$	766	$	658	$	1,013

The current and non-current portion of the capital lease liabilities of ~~$142~~$154 and $184 as of December 31, ~~2007~~2009 are included in other current liabilities and other liabilities, respectively. The capital lease liabilities are secured by ~~a charge over~~ the leased machinery and equipment at cost of ~~$539~~$407 and ~~$537~~$316 as of December 31, ~~2006~~2008 and ~~2007,~~2009, respectively. The accumulated depreciation of these leased assets as of December 31, ~~2006~~2008 and ~~2007~~2009 amounted to ~~$158~~$219 and ~~$214,~~$191, respectively.

The average discount interest rate implicit in the lease is ~~7.8%~~9.25% and ~~7.8%~~9.34% for ~~2006~~2008 and ~~2007,~~2009, respectively.

F-33

ASIA PACIFIC WIRE & CABLE CORPORATION LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of U.S. Dollars, except share data)

12. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES(continued)


	(b)		As of December 31, ~~2007,~~2009, there were outstanding bank guarantees of ~~$50,221 (2006: $43,956; 2005: $14,845)~~$14,688 (2008: $20,962) issued by the banks on behalf of Charoong Thai and its subsidiaries in respect of certain performance bonds as required in the normal course of business of the companies. These guarantees generally expire within 1 year.


	(c)		As of December 31, ~~2007,~~2009, Charoong Thai and its subsidiaries had given continuing corporate guarantee of ~~$79,743 (2006: $58,653; 2005: $50,302)~~$73,333 (2008: $79,891) in respect of banking facilities extended to two Operating Subsidiaries.


	(d)		As of December 31, ~~2007,~~2009, Charoong Thai has contract commitments to purchase ~~totaling $47,431 to $71,147 (2006: $85,403; 2005: $45,657), of~~ raw materials totaling $78,698 to $96,686 (2008: $2,051 to $4,657), from third parties at the prices stipulated in the contracts. APEC, Sigma Cable, CCH and Shanghai Yayang have contract commitments to purchase raw materials totaling $98,487 from third parties at the prices stipulated in the contracts.

~~ASIA PACIFIC WIRE & CABLE CORPORATION LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES~~
~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~
~~(In thousands of US Dollars, except share data)~~


~~14.~~	~~COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES~~ ~~(continued)~~

(e)
	~~(e)~~	As of December 31, ~~2007,~~2009, Sigma Cable has committed to sell/deliver copper cables at a predetermined price totaling ~~$9.3~~$12.6 million ~~(SGD 13.5 million)~~ throughout ~~2008.~~2009. As of December 31, ~~2007~~2009 the estimated fair value ~~gain~~loss not recognized in the financial statements relating to this commitment is approximately ~~$701.~~

	$1.2 million.

(f)		Sigma Cable has agreed to provide continuing financial support to APEC to enable APEC to meet its liabilities as and when they fall due. The letter of awareness from Sigma Cable with an ownership covenant requires Sigma Cable to maintain a minimum of 85% of interest in APEC.


	(g)	Approximately $2,159 of property, plant and equipment of a subsidiary in the People’s Republic of China is located on a piece of leasehold land held by an equity investee. The equity investee is in the process of obtaining the land use right certificate in respect of the said land.


	~~(h)~~	The Company provided a corporate guarantee not exceeding the sum of ~~$3,503 (AUD~~ $2,761 (AU$4 million) to a third party for the procurement of copper by a subsidiary company. The guarantee period is for one year. The latest renewal was made on January 16, 2008 and the guarantee ~~will expire~~expired on February 28, 2009.

		The guarantee is no longer effective, no any form of guarantee will provide for the supplier of copper.
	~~(i)~~	In February 2008, Supreme Court in Singapore rendered a decision against Sigma Cable in which Sigma Cable is found liable to one of its customers for damage approximately in an amount of $886. Sigma Cable appealed the decision. However, the management believes that it is more likely than not that the Company’s appeal will not be successful. Therefore, this amount has been accrued as of December 31, 2005.


	~~(j)~~(h)		The Company provided a corporate guarantee not exceeding the sum of $7 million for bank credit line of one Thailand subsidiary, the guarantee was discharged on February 26, 2010. APWC no longer has any obligation with the bank.

The Company provided a corporate guarantee not exceeding the sum of $7.5 million (SG$10.6 million) for the bond facility of Sigma Cable.

	(i)		A customer of Sigma Cable has claimed for damages relating to the termination of Sigma Cable’s purchase agreement with the customer. On November 30, 2009, a settlement agreement was entered into between Sigma Cable and the customer to provide for the full and final settlement and discharge of all claims and/or disputes for which the parties may have against each other arising out of or in connection with the Purchase Agreement. No gain or loss was resulted from the settlement.

	(j)		As of December 31, 2009, one of China subsidiaries sold its account receivables of $3.3 million (RMB$22.67 million) for a recourse factoring agreement at the ~~date~~total of this report, neither of the parties has started legal action, hence, the outcome of any potential litigation is still uncertain and the amount of damages is yet to be assessed. The management of Sigma Cable is going to have some discussion with this customer in near future.

	$2.9 million (RMB$20 million).

(k)		As disclosed in Note 1, on June 28, 2007 SOF acquired the Sino-JP shares pursuant to a share purchase agreement (the ~~‘‘Purchase Agreement’’~~“Purchase Agreement”), and entered into a shareholders’ agreement with the Company and PEWC (the ‘‘“Shareholders/ Agreement”). On March 27, 2009, SOF sold 10.2% of the issued and outstanding shares of the Company to PEWC and entered into an Amended and Restated Shareholders’ ~~Agreement’’~~Agreement with the Company and PEWC (the “Amended Shareholders’ Agreement”). Among other things, the ~~Shareholders’ Agreement provides for the following:~~Amended

~~Indemnification~~F-34

ASIA PACIFIC WIRE & CABLE CORPORATION LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of U.S. Dollars, except share data)

12. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES(continued)

Shareholders’ Agreement grants to the Company an extension for listing its common shares on a national exchange until February 2011 and provides for the following:

Indemnification

The Company must certify to SOF whether or not it is considered a Controlled Foreign Corporation or a Passive Foreign Investment Company as of each fiscal year end. Should this certification be challenged by the taxing authorities and found to be incorrect, the Company must indemnify SOF and its shareholders against interest and penalties that may be imposed and reasonable attorney’s fees incurred.

It is management’s opinion that this indemnification will not result in any adverse material financial consequence to the Company.

Controlled Foreign Corporation (“CFC”) is any foreign corporation of which more than 50 percent of either -

(1) The total combined voting power of all classes of stock of the corporation entitled to vote; or

(2) The total value of the stock of the corporation, is owned by United States shareholders on any day during the taxable year of such foreign corporation.

Passive Foreign Investment Company (“PFIC”) has one of the following attributes:

(1) At least 75% of the corporation’s income is considered “passive”, which is based on investments rather than standard operating business.

(2) At least 50% of the company’s assets are investments that produce interest, dividends and/or capital gains.

PFICs include foreign-based mutual funds, partnerships and other pooled investment vehicles that have at least one U.S. shareholder.

Registration Rights

~~The Shareholders’ Agreement provides SOF with the certain registration rights.~~

The Company ~~must use its reasonable best efforts to prepare~~has prepared and ~~file~~filed with the SEC a registration statement ~~or statements~~on Form F-1 covering ~~among such other securities as may be offered from time to time by the Company,~~ the resale of the ~~‘‘Registrable Securities’’~~“Registrable Securities” for an offering to be made on a continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 of the Securities Act of ~~1933. ‘‘Registrable Securities’’~~1933, which registration statement was declared effective under the Securities Act by the SEC on March 11, 2009,but requires the filing of a post-effective amendment to include the most recent annual audited financial statements, and, from time to time, unaudited financial statements for the six month period then ended. “Registrable Securities” includes the shares beneficially owned by SOF.

~~ASIA PACIFIC WIRE & CABLE CORPORATION LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES~~
~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~
~~(In thousands of US Dollars, except share data)~~


~~14.~~	~~COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES~~ ~~(continued)~~

~~The~~Subject to the Amended Shareholders’ Agreement, the Company must use its reasonable best efforts to ~~cause any~~keep such registration statement ~~required by the Shareholders’ Agreement to be declared effective as promptly as possible after being filed, and keep such registration statement~~continuously effective until (i) all Registrable Securities either have been sold or may be sold without volume restrictions pursuant to Rule ~~144(k)~~144 of the Securities Act of 1933 and (ii) SOF receives freely transferable shares from the ~~Issuer’s~~Company’s transfer agent.

If ~~(i) any such registration statement is not declared effective by November 30, 2008, or (ii)~~ any such registration statement ceases to remain continuously effective for any reason after the effectiveness date and during any time when the registration statement is required to be effective, or SOF is otherwise not permitted to utilize the prospectus therein to resell such Registrable Securities, in either case, for more than ~~fifteen (15)~~thirty (30) consecutive trading days or more than an aggregate of ~~forty-five (45)~~sixty (60) trading days during any twelve month period (an ‘‘“ Event ~~‘‘)~~“), then the ~~‘‘Put Right’’~~“Put Right” (defined below) will become immediately exercisable and will continue until such event has been cured.

F-35

(a) Concentrations of PEWC. The Company has no purchase, reimbursement or financing obligations in the event that SOF exercises the Put Right. As such, the Company has classified the Put Shares as equity in the accompanying financial statements.


~~15.~~	~~FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS~~


	~~(a)~~	~~Concentrations of credit risk~~

credit risk

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to significant concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash and cash equivalents, bank deposits, investments, investment securities and trade accounts receivable.

The Company maintains cash and cash equivalents with various financial institutions. These financial institutions are located in Singapore, Thailand, Australia, Hong Kong and the People’s Republic of China. The Company’s policy is designed to limit its exposure to any one institution. The Company performs periodic evaluations of the relative credit standing of those financial institutions that are considered in the Company’s investment strategy.

Concentrations of credit risk with respect to trade accounts receivable are limited due to the large number of entities comprising the Company’s customer base. The Company carefully assesses the financial strength of its customers and generally does not require any collateral. At December 31, ~~2007, there was no trade receivable which exceeded 10%~~2009, one Thailand subsidiary’s customer accounted for 10.5% of the Company’s ~~account receivable amounts.~~

accounts receivable.

The Company is exposed to credit loss in the event of non-performance by counter parties on foreign exchange contracts, but the Company does not anticipate non-performance by any counter parties.


	~~(b)~~	~~Fair value~~

(b) Fair Value Disclosures

The following methods and assumptions were used by the Company in estimating its fair value disclosures for financial instruments:

Cash and cash equivalents: The carrying amount reported in the balance sheet for cash and cash equivalents approximates its fair value because of the short-term maturity of these instruments.

Bank deposits: The carrying amount reported in the balance sheet for bank deposits approximates its fair value because of the short-term maturity of these instruments.

Accounts receivable and accounts payable: The carrying amounts reported in the balance sheet for accounts receivable and accounts payable approximate their fair values because of the short-term maturity of these instruments.

~~Investment securities~~

Related party balances: The carrying amounts reported in the balance sheet for related party balances approximate their fair values of marketable equity securities are based on quoted market prices, details of which are set out in Note 7. The fair values for debt securities are based on discounted cash flow analysis using current interest rates for instruments with similar maturities. It is not practicable to estimate the fair valuesbecause of the ~~equity investments that do not have a quoted market price, without incurring excessive costs.~~

short-term maturity of these instruments.

Long-term and short-term debt: The carrying amounts of the Company’s borrowings under its short-term revolving credit arrangements approximate their fair values. The fair values of the Company’s long-term debt are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, based on the Company’s current incremental borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements. As of December 31, ~~2007,~~2009, the Company had no non-interest bearing long-term debt outstanding with a related ~~party of $240. The fair value of this debt was $226 as of December 31, 2007.~~party. The fair value of the non-interest bearing short-term debt from related parties is not determinable because of the related party nature of the debt and the fact that they have no stated due dates.

Investment securities: The fair values of marketable equity securities are based on quoted market prices, details of which are set out in Note 7. In accordance with ASC 820, the marketable securities are classified within Level 1 of fair value hierarchy. The fair values for debt securities and equity securities in privately-held companies are based on discounted cash flow analysis using current interest rates for instruments with similar maturities. It is not practicable to estimate the fair values of the equity investments that do not have a quoted market price, without incurring excessive costs. In accordance with ASC 820, the such instruments are classified in the Level 3 of fair value hierarchy.

Forward exchange contracts: The fair values of forward exchange contracts are estimated by reference to market quotations for forward contracts with similar terms, adjusted where necessary for maturity differences.

The foreign currency forward contracts are classified within Level 2 as the valuation inputs are based on quoted prices and market observable data of similar instruments.

There are no significant differences between the carrying amounts and fair values of the Company’s financial instruments as of December 31, ~~2006~~2008 and ~~2007.~~2009.

The following table presents the Company’s assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis at December 31, 2008 and 2009, using quoted prices in active markets for identical assets (Level 1); significant other observable inputs (Level 2); and significant unobservable inputs (Level 3).


December 31, 2009	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Available-for-sale investment (listed securities)	$	106	$	—	$	—	$	106
Available-for-sale investments (equity securities in privately-held companies)		—		—		580		580
Investment in equity investee companies		—		—		3,263		3,263


Total	$	106	$	—	$	3,843	$	3,949


December 31, 2008	Level 1		Level 2			Level 3		Total
Available-for-sale investment (listed securities)	$	68	$	—		$	—	$	68
Available-for-sale investments (equity securities in privately-held companies)		—		—			544		544
Investment in equity investee companies		—		—			4,103		4,103
Foreign currency forward contracts net payable		—		(107	)		—		—

Total	$	68	$	(107	)	$	4,647	$	4,608

ASIA PACIFIC WIRE & CABLE CORPORATION LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of U.S. Dollars, except share data)

13. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS (continued)

The following table presents the changes in Level 3 instruments measured on a recurring basis for the year ended December 31, 2009. The Company’s Level 3 instrument consists of available-for-sale investment in equity securities in privately-held companies and investment in equity investee companies:


	Available-for-sale
	investments (equity
	securities in		Investment in
	privately-held		equity investee
	companies)		companies
Balance at December 31, 2008	$	544	$	4,103
Realized loss included in earnings		—		(40	)
Decrease in investment in equity investees		—		(800	)
Currency translation adjustments		36		—

Balance at December 31, 2009	$	580	$	3,263

The realized loss of $40 included in earnings for the year ended December 31, 2009, is included in the share of net loss of equity investees.

The following table presents the changes in Level 3 instruments measured on a recurring basis for the year ended December 31, 2008. The Company’s Level 3 instrument consists of available-for-sale investments in equity securities in privately-held companies and investment in equity investee companies:


	Available-for-dales
	(equity securities		Investment in
	in privately-held		equity investee
	companies)		companies
Balance at December 31, 2007	$	—	$	—
Transfer to Level 3		544		4,245
Realized loss included in earnings		—		(142	)

Balance, at December 31, 2008	$	544	$	4,103

The realized loss of $142 included in earnings for the year ended December 31, 2008, was included in share of net loss of equity investees.

14. CURRENT VULNERABILITY DUE TO CERTAIN CONCENTRATIONS

Copper is the principal raw material used by the Company. The Company purchases copper at prices closely related to the prevailing international spot market prices on the London Metal Exchange for copper. The price of copper is influenced heavily by global supply and demand as well as speculative trading. Consequently, a change in the price of copper will have a direct effect on the Company’s cost of sales.

Changes in exchange rates influence the Company’s results of operations. The Company’s principal operations are located in Thailand, the People’s Republic of China ~~(‘‘PRC’’~~(“PRC”) and Singapore and a substantial portion of its revenues are denominated in Thai Baht, ~~PRC Renminbi (‘‘RMB’’)~~U.S. Dollars or Singapore ~~dollars,~~Dollars, whereas a substantial portion of the Company’s cost of sales are denominated in ~~US dollars.~~U.S. Dollars. Any devaluation of the Thai Baht ~~RMB~~ or Singapore dollar against the US dollar would have an adverse impact on the operations of the Company.

F-38

ASIA PACIFIC WIRE & CABLE CORPORATION LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of U.S. Dollars, except share data)

14. CURRENT VULNERABILITY DUE TO CERTAIN CONCENTRATIONS(continued)

The Company conducts substantial business operations in the PRC. The results of operations and prospects are likely to be materially impacted by economic, legal and other developments in the PRC.

The PRC government imposes controls on the convertibility of the Renminbi into foreign currencies and in certain cases, the remittance of currency out of China. Under existing PRC foreign exchange regulations, payments of current account items, including profit distributions, interest payments and expenditures from trade related transactions, can be made in foreign currencies without prior approval from the State Administration of Foreign Exchange ~~(‘‘SAFE’’~~(“SAFE”) by complying with certain procedural requirements. However, approval from SAFE or its local branch is required where ~~Renminbi is to be converted into~~ foreign currency ~~and~~is remitted out of China to pay capital expenses such as the repayment of loans denominated in foreign currencies. The PRC government may also at its discretion ~~restrict~~puts restriction access in the future to foreign currencies for current account transactions. Shortages in the availability of foreign currency may restrict the abilit y of the Company’s subsidiaries in the PRC to remit sufficient foreign currency to pay dividends or other payments to the Company, or otherwise satisfy their foreign currency-denominated obligations.

~~ASIA PACIFIC WIRE & CABLE CORPORATION LIMITED~~15. RELATED PARTY BALANCES AND ~~SUBSIDIARIES~~
~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~
~~(In thousands of US Dollars, except share data)~~


~~17.~~	~~RELATED PARTY BALANCES AND TRANSACTIONS~~

TRANSACTIONS

The related parties are defined as affiliates of the Company; entities for which investments are accounted for by the equity method by the Company; the principal owners of the Company; its management; members of the immediate families of the principal owners of the Company and its management.


	December 31,						December 31,
	2006			2007			2008		2009
Due from:
PEWC		$	739		$	2,076	$	639	$	755
PEWC, Singapore Branch			—			955		1,000		996
PEWC Singapore Co. (Pte) Ltd.			885			—
Italian-Thai Development Public Company Limited (‘‘Ital-Thai’’) and its affiliates			4,639			3,566
Italian-Thai Development Public Company Limited (“Italian-Thai”) and its affiliates								3,176		1,934
SPHC			1,351			1,544		1,390		1,469
A director of Siam Pacific			10			13		12		12
Shandong Yanggu Wire & Cable Corp Ltd (‘‘Shandong Yanggu’’)			809			431
Shandong Yanggu Wire & Cable Corp Ltd (“Shandong Yanggu”)								699		441
Others			101			53		6		57

							$	6,922	$	5,664

		$	8,534		$	8,638
Due to:
PEWC		$	26,898		$	24,577	$	19,140	$	12,131
PEWC, Singapore Branch			—			892		890		891
PEWC Singapore Co. (Pte) Ltd.			3,571			1,183		1,230		1,249
Shandong Yanggu			69			719		383		4
Fujikura Limited			76			220		292		—
Thai Metal Processing Co., Ltd.			50			147		27		109
SPHC			2,619			2,855		2,642		2,713
Shandong Huayu			—			1,208		1,170		385
Shandong Rubber Cable								14		5
Others			23			—		23		—
		$	33,306		$	31,801
							$	25,811	$	17,487


Short-term loans from:
Moon View Venture Limited (‘‘Moon View’’)		$	1,537		$	1,537
Moon View Ventures Limited (“Moon View”)							$	1,732	$	1,732
Pacific Overseas Investment Management Ltd			195			195		—		—
		$	1,732		$	1,732
							$	1,732	$	1,732

The interest rates on the above balances with related parties are ~~interest-free~~ranging from 1.28% 2.70% and are repayable upon demand. All balances with related parties are unsecured.

F-39

ASIA PACIFIC WIRE & CABLE CORPORATION LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of U.S. Dollars, except share data)

15. RELATED PARTY BALANCES AND TRANSACTIONS(continued)

Moon View, PEWC, Singapore Branch and PEWC Singapore Co. (Pte) Ltd are controlled by PEWC. ~~Ital-Thai~~Moon View is the immediate holding company of the Company. Italian-Thai is the minority shareholder of one of the Company’s Operating Subsidiaries in Thailand. Shandong Yanggu is the shareholder of one of the Company’s Operating Subsidiaries in China. SPHC is one of the Company’s equity investees.

~~ASIA PACIFIC WIRE & CABLE CORPORATION LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES~~
~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~
~~(In thousands of US Dollars, except share data)~~


~~17.~~	~~RELATED PARTY BALANCES AND TRANSACTIONS~~ ~~(continued)~~

December 31,
2006 2007
Long term loans from PEWC Singapore Co. (Pte) Ltd $ 900 $ 240
Less: short term portion (900 ) (240 )
Long term portion $ — $ —

The long term loans from PEWC Singapore Co. (Pte) Ltd have a term of three years and were due in March 2007 and are uncollateralized. Partial repayment was made in 2007 and the remaining balance of $240 ~~is expected to be~~was repaid in 2008. As the balance was not paid in full in March 2007, the debt is in default and therefore, is accruing interest at the default interest rate of 7.5% per annum. Through June 12, 2008, the debt has not been called by PEWC Singapore Co. (Pte) Ltd.

The transactions undertaken with related parties ~~can be~~are summarized as follows:


	Year ended December 31,
	2007		2008		2009
Purchases of copper from PEWC	$	55,360	$	46,882	$	33,426
Purchases of power cables from PEWC		11,442		6,631		12,211
Sales to Ital-Thai and its affiliates		8,538		5,427		4,144
Sales to Shandong Yanggu		572		428		—
Purchases of raw materials from Thai Metal Processing Co. Ltd		1,222		1,456		955
Purchases of goods from Fujikura Limited		766		1,133		1,946
Interest expense paid to PEWC		472		275		135
Interest expense paid to PEWC Singapore Co. (Pte) Ltd		64		47		19
Interest income from Italian Thai Development Public Co Ltd		—		75		3
Management fee paid to PEWC		98		189		183
Management fee received from PEWC, Singapore Branch		12		13		13
Management fee received from Italian Thai Development Public Co., Ltd		—		—		63
Purchases of goods from PEWC		—		713		11,247
Purchases of goods from Shandong Yanggu		450		586		—
Dividend income from Thai Metal Processing Co. Ltd.		104		130		65

F-40

ASIA PACIFIC WIRE & CABLE CORPORATION LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES

Copper is the major raw material of the Company’s wire and cable products. The Company purchases copper in the form of copper rods and copper cathode. Copper cathode is purchased by Siam Pacific to avoid the high import tariff levied on copper rods. Copper cathode needs to be processed into copper rods prior to the manufacturing of wire and cable products.

Substantially all of the Company’s copper rods are supplied by PEWC while copper cathodes are supplied by unrelated third parties. The price of copper rods purchased from PEWC is determined by reference to the quoted copper prices on the London Metal Exchange (the ~~‘‘LME’’~~“LME”) plus a certain premium.

In addition to copper rods, the Company purchases high voltage power cable from PEWC for distribution purposes. The purchase price of power cable from PEWC is determined by reference to the quoted copper prices on the LME. Prior to 2003, a sales commission at an average rate of 1% to 3% was received from PEWC in addition to sales proceeds received from customers. No sales commission was received from PEWC during the years 2005, 2006 and 2007.

~~ASIA PACIFIC WIRE & CABLE CORPORATION LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES~~
~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~
(In ~~thousands~~addition to copper rods, the Company purchases high voltage power cable from PEWC for distribution purposes. The purchase price of ~~US Dollars, except share data)~~


~~17.~~	~~RELATED PARTY BALANCES AND TRANSACTIONS~~ ~~(continued)~~

power cable from PEWC is determined by reference to the quoted copper prices on the LME. No sales commission was received from PEWC during the years 2007, 2008 and 2009.

Pursuant to the composite services ~~agreement,~~

agreement:

ASIA PACIFIC WIRE & CABLE CORPORATION LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of U.S. Dollars, except share data)

15. RELATED PARTY BALANCES AND TRANSACTIONS(continued)

successful completion of the facility or venture, PEWC ~~w ill~~will arrange for the Company to participate to the extent possible.


	(f)		Without the consent of the Company, PEWC will not compete with respect to the manufacture of wire and cable products in any market in which the Company is manufacturing or has taken significant steps to commence manufacturing.


	(g)		For purposes of the composite services agreement, each province in China is considered the equivalent of a market.

~~ASIA PACIFIC WIRE & CABLE CORPORATION LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES~~
~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~
~~(In thousands of US Dollars, except share data)~~


~~17.~~	~~RELATED PARTY BALANCES AND TRANSACTIONS~~ ~~(continued)~~

(h)
	~~(h)~~	The composite services agreement dated November 7, 1996 has a three-year term. The Agreement originally expired on November 7, 1999. The Company gave a notice to extend the Agreement by successive one-year periods commencing on April 20, 2001. The notice is treated as a standing notice for successive one-year period renewals until further written notice from the Company.

To the extent that transactions occur in the future between the Company and PEWC or affiliates of PEWC other than under the Composite Service Agreement, such transactions will be entered into on an arm’s length basis on terms no less favorable than those available from unaffiliated third parties.


~~18.~~	~~DEFINED CONTRIBUTION AND BENEFIT PLANS~~

~~As discussed in Note 4, the~~

16. DEFINED CONTRIBUTION AND BENEFIT PLANS

The Company adopted the recognition and disclosure provisions of ~~SFAS 158,~~ASC 715-30, “Defined Benefit Plans-Pension,” effective December 31, 2006, which changed the manner in which the funded status of the Company’s defined benefit plans is reported in the consolidated balance sheet. Under ~~SFAS 158,~~ASC 715-30, actuarial gains and losses and prior service costs continue to be deferred and recognized in expense ratably over appropriate future periods, but the overfunded or underfunded status of the defined benefit plans is now measured as the difference between the fair value of plan assets and the projected benefit obligation ~~(‘‘PBO’’~~(“PBO”). This difference is recorded as an asset (if overfunded) or a liability (if underfunded), with a corresponding adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax. To reflect the funded status of its plans in the consolidated balance sheet upon adopting ~~SFAS 158,~~ASC 715-30, the Company recorded an adjustment to increase its liability for pension and other postretirement benefits by $71. Following adoption, as the net unrecognized actuarial loss and unrecognized prior service costs are recognized in net periodic benefit cost in the consolidated statements of ~~income,~~operations, those amounts are reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss.

~~SFAS 158~~

ASC 715-30 will also require companies to measure the funded status of their defined benefit plans as of the balance sheet date, beginning in fiscal years ending after December 15, 2008. The Company currently measures the funded status of its plan as of the balance sheet date.

The Company has several defined contribution plans covering its employees in Australia, the People’s Republic of China ~~(‘‘PRC’’~~(“PRC”) and Singapore. Contributions to the plan are made annually. Total charges for the years ended December 31, ~~2005, 2006~~2007, 2008 and ~~2007~~2009 were ~~$363, $815~~$785, $795, and ~~$785,~~$692 respectively.

In accordance with the Thailand labor law, Charoong Thai is obliged to make payment to retiring employees, at rates of 1 to 10 times of their final month’s salary rate, depending on the length of service. During the financial year ~~2007,~~2009, the Company’s total expense included ~~$193 (2006: $140; 2005: $146)~~$451 (2008: $191; 2007: $193). The plan is not funded and the amount is recognized in Other Current Liabilities in the balance sheet. The Company pays to settle the obligations as and when employees retire.

F-42

In conformity with SFAS 132, ‘‘Employers’ Disclosures about Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits,’’ and SFAS 158, ‘‘Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefits Pension and Other Postretirement Plans’’,ASC 715-30, the following table sets forth the Plan’s funded status and pension amounts recognized as at December 31, ~~2006~~2008 and ~~2007~~2009 based on the latest actuarial valuation:


									2008			2009
	2006				2007
Change in benefit obligation:
Benefit obligation at beginning of year		$	1,128			$	1,265		$	1,868		$	1,773
Foreign currency translation adjustments			—				424			(279	)		61
Service cost			78				102			107			374
Interest cost			62				91			88			85
Benefits paid			(3	)			(85	)		(11	)		(281	)
Actuarial loss (gain)			—				193			—			—
Plan amendments			—				(122	)		—			—
Curtailment			—				—
Settlement			—				—

Benefit obligation at end of year		$	1,265			$	1,868		$	1,773		$	2,012


Change in plan assets:
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year		$	—			$	—		$	—		$	—
Employer’s contribution
Actual return on plan assets			—				—
Settlement			—				—
Benefits paid			—				—

Fair value of plan assets at end of year			—				—			—			—

Funded status		$	(1,265	)		$	(1,868	)	$	(1,773	)	$	(2,012	)
Unrealized net transition obligation			—				—			—			—
Unrecognized net actuarial loss (gain)			—				—			—			—

Accrued benefit cost		$	(1,265	)		$	(1,868	)	$	(1,773	)	$	(2,012	)


Components of net periodic benefit cost:
Service cost		$	78			$	102		$	107		$	374
Interest cost			62				91			88			85
Expected return on plan assets			—				—
Amortizations of:			—				—
Unrecognized net transition obligation			—				—
Unrecognized net prior service cost (credit)										(6	)		(8	)
Unrecognized actuarial loss			—				—			2			2

Net periodic benefit cost		$	140			$	193		$	191		$	451
Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income consist of the following: (recognized under SAFS 158)


Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss consist of the following: (recognized under ASC 715-30)
Actuarial loss		$	—			$	193		$	163		$	68
Prior service cost (credit)			—				(122	)		(99	)		—
Total recognized in other comprehensive income		$	—			$	71


Total recognized in other comprehensive loss									$	64		$	68

The accumulated benefit obligations amounted to ~~$1,265~~$1,773 and ~~$1,868~~$2,012 as at December 31, ~~2006~~2008 and ~~2007,~~2009, respectively.

~~ASIA PACIFIC WIRE & CABLE CORPORATION LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES~~
~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~
~~(In thousands of US Dollars, except share data)~~


~~18.~~	~~DEFINED CONTRIBUTION AND BENEFIT PLANS~~ ~~(continued)~~

The estimated net loss and prior service cost (credit) for the defined benefit plans that will be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) into net periodic benefit cost over the next fiscal year are $2$19 and $(6), respectively.

ASIA PACIFIC WIRE & CABLE CORPORATION LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of U.S. Dollars, except share data)

16. DEFINED CONTRIBUTION AND BENEFIT PLANS(continued)

The significant assumptions used in determining the actuarial present value of the projected benefit obligations as at December 31, 2008, 2007 ~~2006~~ and ~~2005~~2006 are as follows:


			~~2005, 2006~~ ~~and 2007~~
~~Discount Rate~~			~~6.0%~~
~~Rate of Increase in Compensation Levels~~			~~5.0% – 6.0%~~
~~Employee turnover rates:-~~
~~Prior to age 35~~			~~2.0% – 10.0%~~
~~Age 35 to 50~~			~~2.0% – 5.0%~~
~~Age 51 to 60~~			—


	2008			2009
Discount Rate		5.5	%		5.5	%
Rate of Increase in Compensation Levels		5.0	%		5.0	%
Employee turnover rates:-
Prior to age 35		2.0% - 10.0	%		4.0% - 15.0	%
Age 35 to 50		2.0% - 5.0	%		2.0% - 7.0	%
Age 51 to 60		—			—

The following pension benefit payments, which reflect expected future service, as appropriate, are expected to be paid:

Year ended December 31
2008 $ 209
2009 77
2010 89
2011 110
2012 45
2013-2017 1,028
$ 1,558


~~19.~~	~~SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION~~


Year ended December 31
2010		255
2011		69
2012		38
2013		49
2014		212
2015 - 2019		1,157

	$	1,780

Year ended December 31,
2005 2006 2007
Interest paid $ 3,742 $ 5,551 $ 7,187
Income taxes paid $ 4,490 $ 5,625 $ 10,772
17. SEGMENT FINANCIAL INFORMATION

~~ASIA PACIFIC WIRE & CABLE CORPORATION LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES~~
~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~
~~(In thousands of US Dollars, except share data)~~


~~20.~~	~~SEGMENT FINANCIAL INFORMATION~~

Description of Products by Segment

The Company ~~has~~currently operates in three ~~reportable segments –~~operating segments: (1) manufacturing of wire and cable products ~~(‘‘~~(“Manufactured ~~products’’~~products”), (2) distribution of copper and cable products manufactured by PEWC ~~(‘‘~~(“Distributed ~~products’’~~products”) and (3) sales, delivery and installation of wires and cables.

Measurement of Segment Profit or Loss and Segment Assets

The Company evaluates performance and allocates resources based on profit or loss from operations before interest, gains and losses on the Company’s investment portfolio, and income taxes. The accounting policies of the reportable segments, including transactions entered between reportable segments, are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting ~~policies.~~polices.

F-44

Year ended December 31,
2005 2006 2007
Revenues
Revenues from external customers:
Manufactured products $ 301,516 $ 439,280 $ 494,805
Distributed products 20,055 12,416 10,783
Sales, delivery and installation of wires and cables 15,691 16,421 5,253
Total revenues from external customers $ 337,262 $ 468,117 $ 510,841
Intersegment revenues:
Manufactured products $ 4,581 $ 934 $ 2,648
Total intersegment revenues $ 4,581 $ 934 $ 2,648
Total revenue $ 341,843 $ 469,051 $ 513,489
Reconciling items
Intersegment revenues (4,581 ) (934 ) (2,648 )
Total consolidated revenues $ 337,262 $ 468,117 $ 510,841

ASIA PACIFIC WIRE & CABLE CORPORATION LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES


	Year ended December 31,
	2007			2008			2009
Revenues

Revenues from external customers:
Manufactured products	$	494,805		$	447,848		$	300,121
Distributed products		10,783			32,415			28,102
Sales, delivery and installation of wires and cables		5,253			20,535			34,008


Total revenues from external customers	$	510,841		$	500,798		$	362,231


Intersegment revenues:
Manufactured products	$	2,648		$	348		$	12,235


Total segment revenues	$	513,489		$	501,146		$	374,466

Reconciling item
Elimination of intersegment revenues		(2,648	)		(348	)		(12,235	)


Total revenues	$	510,841		$	500,798		$	362,231


	Year ended December 31,
	2007			2008			2009
Segment profit (loss)
Manufactured products	$	44,671		$	37,267		$	20,036
Distributed products		80			1,584			1,517
Sales, delivery and installation of wires and cables		(347	)		(956	)		899
Recovery (allowance) for inventory reserve		1,272			(25,145	)		23,949


Total segment profit	$	45,676		$	12,750		$	46,391

Reconciling items
Corporate and other expenses		(29,511	)		(29,044	)		(27,932	)
Exchange gain (loss)		864			(1,712	)		528
Interest income		1,517			990			458
Interest expense		(7,580	)		(5,769	)		(2,597	)
Share of net (loss) gain of equity investees		124			(142	)		(40	)
Gain on liquidation of subsidiary		—			—			568
Other income		2,070			2,859			2,196


Total income (loss) before income taxes	$	13,160		$	(20,068	)	$	19,572


Segment assets
Manufactured products	$	373,057		$	283,528		$	280,179
Distributed products		5,117			10,499			6,363
Sales, delivery and installation of wires and cables		1,649			416			864


Total segment assets	$	379,823		$	294,443		$	287,406

Reconciling items
Corporate and other assets		12,047			11,252			5,383
Investment in equity investee companies		4,246			4,103			3,263


Total assets	$	396,116		$	309,798		$	296,052


Expenditures for additions to long-lived assets
Manufactured products	$	2,650		$	3,383		$	3,261
Distributed products		—			—			—
Sales, delivery and installation of wires and cables		—			—			—
Corporate		—			—			—


Total expenditure for additions to long-lived assets	$	2,650		$	3,383		$	3,261

ASIA PACIFIC WIRE & CABLE CORPORATION LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES


	Year ended December 31,
	2007			2008			2009
Depreciation expenses
Manufactured products	$	(9,050	)	$	(7,645	)	$	(8,927	)
Distributed products		—			—			—
Sales, delivery and installation of wires and cables		—			—			—
Corporate		(29	)		(1	)		(14	)


Total depreciation expenses	$	(9,079	)	$	(7,646	)	$	(8,941	)


Impairment loss
Manufactured products	$	—		$	—		$	—
Distributed products		—			—			—
Sales, delivery and installation of wires and cables		—			—			—
Corporate	$	(95	)	$	—		$	(77	)


Total impairment expense	$	(95	)	$	—		$	(77	)


Interest income
Manufactured products	$	1,406		$	803		$	408
Distributed products		66			107			21
Sales, delivery and installation of wires and cables		45			75			29
Corporate		—			5			—


Total interest income	$	1,517		$	990		$	458


Interest expense
Manufactured products	$	(7,184	)	$	(5,368	)	$	(2,414	)
Distributed products		(250	)		(273	)		(59	)
Sales, delivery and installation of wires and cables		(62	)		(128	)		(87	)
Corporate		(84	)		—			(37	)


Total interest expense	$	(7,580	)	$	(5,769	)	$	(2,597	)


Share of net (loss) gain of equity investees
Manufactured products	$	—		$	—		$	—
Distributed products		—			—			—
Sales, delivery and installation of wires and cables		—			—			—
Corporate	$	124		$	(142	)	$	(40	)


Total share of net (loss) gain of equity investees	$	124		$	(142	)	$	(40	)

ASIA PACIFIC WIRE & CABLE CORPORATION LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of U.S. Dollars, except share data)

17. SEGMENT FINANCIAL INFORMATION(continued)

Significant sales of ~~approximately~~ 10% or more of the total revenue for any of the financial year are to a customer, SP Powerassets, which include sales of manufactured products, distributed products, and sales, delivery and installation of wires and cables, which can be summarized as follows:


	Year ended December 31,									Year ended December 31,
	2005			2006			2007			2007		2008		2009
Manufactured products		$	1,477		$	3,217		$	7,114	$	7,114	$	11,973	$	10,398
Distributed products			14,521			11,668			6,710		6,710		27,162		22,746
Sales, delivery and installation of wires and cables			15,316			16,679			5,064		5,064		20,535		32,806
		$	31,314		$	31,564		$	18,888

										$	18,888	$	59,670	$	65,950

~~ASIA PACIFIC WIRE & CABLE CORPORATION LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES~~
~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~
~~(In thousands of US Dollars, except share data)~~


~~20.~~	~~SEGMENT FINANCIAL INFORMATION~~ ~~(continued)~~

Geographic Area Data

Revenue from external customers is attributed to individual countries based on the customer’s country of domicile and is summarized as follows:


	Year ended December 31,
	2007		2008		2009
Revenues from external customers
Thailand	$	249,337	$	216,364	$	119,225
Singapore		47,798		86,625		94,782
Australia		55,789		62,810		34,574
The People’s Republic of China		157,917		134,999		113,650


Total revenues from external customers	$	510,841	$	500,798	$	362,231


Long-lived assets by area:
Thailand	$	37,037	$	29,027	$	28,002
Singapore		8,485		8,090		8,069
Australia		3,965		2,841		3,515
The People’s Republic of China		16,800		16,819		12,837
Others		32		30		18


Total long-lived assets	$	66,319	$	56,807	$	52,441

ASIA PACIFIC WIRE & CABLE CORPORATION LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES

The following tables present summarized financial information of the Company’s principal equity investees, Lox Pac, ~~Thai Professional,~~ SPHC, Shandong Huayu and ~~SPRC for 2005, 2006 and 2007.~~

SPRC.

December 31,
2006 2007
Unaudited Unaudited
Current assets $ 20,426 $ 26,338
Non-current assets 24,642 25,261
Current liabilities (17,804 ) (18,847 )
Non-current liabilities (1,679 ) (2,006 )
Total shareholders’ equity $ 25,585 $ 30,746


	As o of December 31,
	2008			2009
	Unaudited			Unaudited
Current assets	$	31,760		$	36,591
Non-current assets		18,804			22,467
Current liabilities		(21,271	)		(29,441	)
Non-current liabilities		(1,731	)		(1,824	)


Total shareholders’ equity	$	27,562		$	27,793


	Year ended December 31,										Year ended December 31,
	2005			2006				2007			2007		2008			2009
	Unaudited			Unaudited				Unaudited			Unaudited		Unaudited			Unaudited
Net sales		$	17,207		$	19,016			$	24,332	$	24,332	$	34,771		$	28,090
Sales less cost of sales			12,571			5,279				6,469		6,469		9,470			6,582
Net income/(loss)			659			(516	)			127
Net income/ (loss)												127		(1,271	)		(629	)

At December 31, 2009, the Company’s share of the underlying net assets of certain equity investees was higher than its value of the investment in these equity investee companies, therefore no impairment charge was recorded in 2009. At December 31, 2007, the Company’s share of the underlying net assets of certain equity investees was lower than its value of the investment in these equity ~~investees.~~investee companies. Accordingly, the Company recorded an impairment charge in value of its investment in these equity ~~investees~~investee companies amounting to ~~$117 (2006: $nil).~~

$117.

19. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

~~ASIA PACIFIC WIRE & CABLE CORPORATION LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES~~
~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~
~~(In thousands~~

The Board of ~~US Dollars, except share data)~~


~~21.~~	~~SUMMARIZED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF EQUITY INVESTEES~~ ~~(continued)~~

~~Certain equity investees did not use PCAOB-registered accountants in the preparation~~Directors of ~~their financial statements, and as a minority shareholder,~~ the Company ~~cannot compel these equity investees~~approved a restructuring plan of a wholly owned subsidiary in Hong Kong, Crown Century Holding Limited (“CCH (HK)”). In connection with the restructuring plan, CCH (HK) planned to ~~re-audit their financial records.~~ acquire 51% of Australia Pacific Electric Cable Pty Limited (“APEC”) shares from Sigma Cable Company (Private) Limited (“Sigma Cable”) for a consideration of US$9,959, in order to settle the loans being extended by CCH (HK) to Sigma Cable. APEC and Sigma Cable are the majority owned subsidiaries of the Company.

The ~~Company is thus unable~~share transfer was completed on March 3, 2010, The Company’s interest in APEC increased by 0.87% to ~~include audited financial statements of these equity investees in these financial statements.~~99.40% after the share transfer from Sigma Cable to CCH (HK).

F-49


	•		our prospects for future revenues and profits in the markets in which we operate;


	•		the possibility that our Common Shares will again be listed on a national exchange;


	•		our dependence on a limited number of suppliers for our raw materials and our vulnerability to fluctuations in the cost of our raw materials; and


	For the Year Ended December 31,
	2003				2004				2005				2006				2007
	(in thousands, except per share amounts)
Income Statement Data:
Net sales		$	211,399			$	294,256			$	337,262			$	468,117			$	510,841
Cost of sales			(178,111	)			(255,384	)			(300,656	)			(410,823	)			(465,165	)
Gross profit			33,288				38,872				36,606				57,294				45,676
Other operating income			1,336				—				—				—				—
Operating expenses			(20,479	)			(28,867	)			(26,553	)			(27,612	)			(29,451	)
Impairment loss			—				(134	)			(3,223	)			(86	)			(95	)
Operating profit			14,145				9,871				6,830				29,596				16,130
Exchange gain/(loss)			4,161				233				(3,137	)			5,464				864
Net interest income/(expense)			(1,122	)			(2,025	)			(2,747	)			(5,181	)			(6,063	)
Share of net income/(loss) of equity investees			1,475				(4,224	)			170				73				124
Gain on liquidation of subsidiary			—				—				—				1,801				—
Gain/(loss) on sale of investment			(885	)			(1,161	)			(259	)			(729	)			35
Others			(214	)			925				829				1,536				2,070
Income/(loss) before income taxes and minority interests			17,560				3,619				1,686				32,560				13,160
Income taxes			(2,477	)			(4,716	)			(3,860	)			(10,257	)			(6,298	)
Minority interests			(5,083	)			(1,427	)			(2,783	)			(9,330	)			(2,029	)
Net income/(loss)		$	10,000			$	(2,524	)		$	(4,957	)		$	12,973				4,833
Earnings/(loss) per share⁽¹⁾		$	0.72			$	(0.18	)		$	(0.36	)		$	0.94			$	0.35


Year Ended December 31,	At Period End		Average⁽¹⁾		High		Low
	(Bt per $1.00)
2003		39.63		41.485		43.18		39.09
2004		38.80		40.263		41.70		38.80
2005		40.99		40.339		42.08		38.21
2006		36.10		37.680		40.76		35.19
2007		29.50		32.020		35.96		29.28


Month	High		Low
December 2007		30.62		29.50
January 2008		29.36		31.45
February 2008		32.08		29.53
March 2008		31.56		31.10
April 2008		31.74		31.38
May 2008		32.48		31.62


	Payments due by period
Contractual obligations as of December 31, 2007 (In thousands of US$)	Total		2008		2009-2010		2011-2012		After 2012
Long term debt		—		—		—		—		—
Long term loan from PEWC		240		240		—		—		—
Capital lease obligations (principal amount only)		326		146		180		—		—
Operating leases		3,441		425		293		272		2,451
Purchase obligations for copper cathodes		71,147		71,147		—		—		—
Total contractual cash obligations		75,154		71,958		473		272		2,451


Identity of Person or Group	Number of Shares		Percent of Class
Pacific Electric Wire & Cable Co., Ltd.		7,664,615		55.400	%
SOF Investments, L.P.		2,766,154		20.000	%
Directors and Officers of the Company		10,000		0.072	%


	~~8.1.1~~	~~Sino-JP/PEWC/APWC Litigation (Settled); See Section 4.1.2: ‘‘Recent Developments’’~~


	Price per Share ($)
	High		Low
2003
First Quarter		1.06		0.83
Second Quarter		1.60		0.75
Third Quarter		2.74		1.40
Fourth Quarter		3.60		2.15
2004
First Quarter		3.10		2.25
Second Quarter		2.90		1.90
Third Quarter		3.49		2.20
Fourth Quarter		4.75		2.90
2005
First Quarter		4.80		3.75
Second Quarter		4.00		2.20
Third Quarter		2.55		1.20
Fourth Quarter		2.23		1.40
2006
First Quarter		1.60		0.81
Second Quarter		1.60		0.83
Third Quarter		4.00		0.99
Fourth Quarter		2.95		2.15
2007
First Quarter		4.20		2.50
Second Quarter		5.00		3.03
Third Quarter		7.19		4.95
Fourth Quarter		5.95		4.50


	~~10.1.15~~	~~Access to Books and Records and Dissemination of Information~~


	~~10.1.21~~	~~Personal Liability of Directors and Indemnity~~


	Common stock			Additional paid-in capital			Retained earnings				Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)				Total
Balance at January 1, 2005		$	138		$	111,541		$	18,508			$	(23,041	)		$	107,146
Net loss for 2005			—			—			(4,957	)			—				(4,957	)
Currency translation adjustment			—			—			—				(4,062	)			(4,062	)
Unrealized loss on available-for-sale securities – net of income tax of $286			—			—			—				(505	)			(505	)
Comprehensive loss																	(9,524	)
Balance at December 31, 2005			138			111,541			13,551				(27,608	)			97,622
Net income for 2006			—			—			12,973				—				12,973
Currency translation adjustment			—			—			—				9,822				9,822
Less: reclassification adjustment for realized translation gain for liquidation of subsidiary included in net income, net of income tax of $556			—			—			—				(1,245	)			(1,245	)
Gain realized on sale of available-for-sale securities – net of income tax of $258			—			—			—				(343	)			(343	)
Unrealized loss on available-for-sales securities – net of income tax of $92			—			—			—				(64	)			(64	)
Comprehensive income																	21,143
Balance at December 31, 2006			138			111,541			26,524				(19,438	)			118,765
Net income for 2007			—			—			4,833				—				4,833
Currency translation adjustment			—			—			—				15,179				15,179
Pension benefits recognized under SFAS 158 (note 18)			—			—			—				(71	)			(71	)
Adoption of FIN 48 effective January 1, 2007 (note 12)			—			—			(1,889	)			—				(1,889	)
Gain realized on sale of available-for-sale securities – net of income tax of $6			—			—			—				(28	)			(28	)
Unrealized loss on available-for-sale securities – net of income tax of $6			—			—			—				(6	)			(6	)
Comprehensive income																	18,018
Balance at December 31, 2007		$	138		$	111,541		$	29,468			$	(4,364	)		$	136,783


Place of incorporation and operations	Percentage of Equity interest
	2006	2007
The British Virgin Islands
Asia Pacific Wire & Cable General Holdings Ltd	100%	100%
PRC (APWC) Holding Ltd.	100%	100%
Samray Inc.	100%	100%
Siam (APWC) Holdings Ltd.	100%	100%
Moon View Ltd.	100%	100%
Trigent Investment Holdings Limited	100%	100%
Crown Century Holdings Ltd.	100%	100%
Singapore
Sigma Cable Company (Private) Limited (‘‘Sigma Cable’’)	98.3%	98.3%
Sino-Sin Trading Pte. Ltd. (‘‘Sino-Sin’’)	100%	100%
Sigma-Epan International Pte Ltd. (‘‘Sigma-Epan’’)	100%	100%
Singvale Pte Ltd (‘‘Singvale’’)	100%	100%
The People’s Republic of China
Ningbo Pacific Cable Co., Ltd. (‘‘Ningbo Pacific’’)	94.31%	94.31%
Shanghai Yayang Electric Co., Ltd. (‘‘Shanghai Yayang’’)	53.9%	54.41%
Shandong Pacific Fiber Optics Co.Ltd (‘‘SPFO’’)	51%	51%
Pacific Electric Wire & Cable (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd (‘‘PEWS’’)	100%	100%
Hong Kong
Crown Century Holdings Limited (‘‘CCH’’)	100%	100%
Australia
Australia Pacific Electric Cable Pty Limited (‘‘APEC’’)	98.53%	98.53%
Thailand
Charoong Thai Wire and Cable Public Company Limited (‘‘Charoong Thai’’)	50.39%	50.93%
Siam Pacific Electric Wire & Cable Company Limited (‘‘Siam-Pacific’’)	50.39%	50.93%
Pacific-Thai Electric Wire & Cable Company Limited (‘‘Pacific-Thai’’)	50.39%	50.93%
Hard Lek Limited (‘‘Hard Lek’’)	73.98%	73.98%
APWC (Thailand) Co., Ltd	95.66%	99.48%
PEWC (Thailand) Co., Ltd	95.66%	99.48%
Myanmar
Myanmar Sigma Cable Co., Ltd. (Not active)	78.59%	78.59%


	~~ii)~~	~~The equity investees of the Company are set out below:~~


*	~~Accounted~~	Charoong Thai is listed on the Stock Exchange of Thailand and is engaged in the manufacturing of wire and cable products for ~~as an equity investee despite~~ the ~~Company holding less than 20% equity interest because~~power and telecommunications industries in Thailand.

**		Sino-Sin commenced its liquidation process on November 20, 2008 and the ~~Company has the ability to exercise significant influence over the operating and financial policies of Thai Professional.~~liquidation was completed in July 2009.


	Available-for-sale Securities
	Cost			Gross Unrealized Gains			Gross Unrealized Losses				Estimated Fair Value
December 31, 2006 Quoted equity securities		$	432		$	14		$	(214	)		$	232
December 31, 2007 Quoted equity securities		$	473		$	—		$	(272	)		$	201


	(i)		Mortgage of the Company’s land, buildings, machinery and equipment with a total carrying amount of ~~$37,541~~$24,913 at December 31, ~~2007 (2006: $26,607)~~2009 (2008: $40,246);


Description	Balance at beginning of year			Net charged (credited) to costs and expenses				Deduction				Currency translation adjustment				Balance at end of year
Year ended December 31, 2005:
Deducted from asset accounts
Allowance for doubtful accounts		$	8,516		$	1,017			$	(986	)		$	(164	)		$	8,383
Allowance for inventories
– Net realizable value			—			201				—				—				201
– Obsolescence			3,450			145				(1,579	)			(75	)			1,941
Allowance for deferred tax assets			5,145			2,397				—				(1,515	)			6,027
		$	17,111		$	3,760			$	(2,565	)		$	(1,754	)		$	16,552
Year ended December 31, 2006:
Deducted from asset accounts
Allowance for doubtful accounts		$	8,383		$	1,221			$	(946	)		$	632			$	9,290
Allowance for inventories
– Net realizable value			201			1,121				—				—				1,322
– Obsolescence			1,941			896				(509	)			156				2,484
Allowance for deferred tax assets			6,027			(2,088	)			—				402				4,341
		$	16,552		$	1,150			$	(1,455	)		$	1,190			$	17,437
Year ended December 31, 2007:
Deducted from asset accounts
Allowance for doubtful accounts		$	9,290		$	3,295			$	(2,172	)		$	1,072			$	11,485
Allowance for inventories
– Net realizable value			1,322			(363	)			—				102				1,061
– Obsolescence			2,484			(909	)			—				200				1,775
Allowance for deferred tax assets			4,341			(3,158	)			—				302				1,485
		$	17,437		$	(1,135	)		$	(2,172	)		$	1,676			$	15,806


~~11.~~	~~VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS~~ ~~(continued)~~


	Currency translation adjustments				Unrealized gains (losses) on available- for-sale securities				Others				Total
Balance at January 1, 2005		$	(24,078	)		$	1,037			$	—			$	(23,041	)
Currency translation adjustment			(4,062	)			—				—				(4,062	)
Unrealized losses on available-for-sale securities			—				(791	)			—				(791	)
Deferred taxes relating to unrealized losses on available-for-sale securities			—				286				—				286
Balance at December 31, 2005			(28,140	)			532				—				(27,608	)
Currency translation adjustment			9,822				—				—				9,822
Realized gain on liquidation of subsidiary			(1,801	)			—				—				(1,801	)
Deferred taxes relating to realized gain on liquidation of subsidiary			556				—				—				556
Gain realized on sale of available-for-sale securities			—				(601	)			—				(601	)
Deferred taxes relating to realized gain on sales of available-for-sale securities			—				258				—				258
Unrealized losses on available-for-sale securities			—				(156	)			—				(156	)
Deferred taxes relating to unrealized losses on available-for-sale securities			—				92				—				92
Balance at December 31, 2006			(19,563	)			125				—				(19,438	)
Currency translation adjustment			15,179				—				—				15,179
Gain realized on sale of available-for-sale securities			—				(34	)			—				(34	)
Deferred taxes relating to realized gain on sales of available-for-sale securities			—				6				—				6
Unrealized losses on available-for-sale securities			—				(12	)			—				(12	)
Deferred taxes relating to unrealized losses
on available-for-sale securities			—				6				—				6
Pension benefits recognized under SFAS 158			—				—				(71	)			(71	)
Balance at December 31, 2007		$	(4,384	)		$	91			$	(71	)		$	(4,364	)


~~16.~~	~~CURRENT VULNERABILITY DUE TO CERTAIN CONCENTRATIONS~~


	(a)		PEWC will sell copper rod to the Company, upon the Company’s request, (i) at a price consisting of the average spot price of copper on the LME for the one month prior to purchase plus an agreed upon premium, (ii) at prices and on terms at least as favorable as it provides copper rod to other purchasers of similar amounts of copper rod in the same markets as PEWC and (iii) will give priority in the supply of copper rod to the Company over other purchasers of copper rod from PEWC.


	(b)		PEWC grants to the Company the right to distribute any wire or cable product manufactured by PEWC in all markets in which the Company presently distributes or develops the capability to distribute in the future, such products on such terms as have historically been in effect or on terms at least as favorable as PEWC grants to third parties that distribute such products in such markets. However, PEWC shall not be required to grant to the Company the right to distribute products manufactured by PEWC in the future in markets where the Company does not currently have the capability to distribute unless and until PEWC has no pre-existing contractual rights which would conflict with the grant of such right to the Company.


	(c)		PEWC will make available to the Company, upon the Company’s request and on terms to be mutually agreed between PEWC and the Company from time to time, access to certain of PEWC’s technology (and PEWC personnel necessary to use such technology) with respect to the design and manufacture of wire and cable products, including, without limitation, certain fiber optic technology.


	(e)		Each of PEWC and the Company will offer the other party the right to participate in any negotiations with a third party concerning the establishment of any facility or similar venture to manufacture or distribute any wire or cable product outside of the markets where the Company currently manufactures or distributes, or intends to develop the capability to manufacture or distribute, any wire or cable product. Unless the Company and PEWC mutually agree otherwise, the Company shall have the right of first refusal to enter into any definitive agreement with such third party. If, however, such third party would not agree to the substitution of the Company for PEWC or such substitution would prevent the

~~Principal Amount (In thousands of US$)~~

~~Bank loans and overdrafts~~

~~102,174~~

~~Long-term debt~~

~~Interest-bearing long-term loan from PEWC~~

~~102,174~~